. v I ALUMNI LIBRARY, f * THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, | # PRINCETCtoJ, N. J. ^ BV 4627 .C6 H3 183'^ Harris, John, 1802-1856 Mammon ^IT i W> V J w i GOUI.D, KENDALI. & LINCOLN, :i3ufalisl)crs, 33oofe;scllcrs, ^ Statfoncvs, 59 VViSHiNGTotT St.... Boston, Have recently published A NEW PRIZE ESSAY, BY THE AUTHOR OF " MAMMON," ENTITLED ZEBULON; OR, THE MORAL CLAIMS OF SEAMEN STATED AND ENFORCED^ BY REV. JOHN HARRIS, Of Epsom, England. FIRST AMERICAN, REVISED FROM THE THIRD LONDOW EDITIOIC. Edited by Rev.W. M. Rogers, pastor of Franklin Street Church, and Rev. Daniel M. Lord, Seaman's Preacher, Boston. Preface to the American Edition. The following work is substantially a reprint of Britannia, a Prize Essay by Mr. Harris, on the mor- al claims of Seamen. It seemed desirable that a pro- duction by such an author, on such a subject, should come as extensively as possible before the American public. In examining the Essay with reference to the press, it was found to be so completely English, as to render its naturalization indispensable to secure its highest utility among us. The very things, which in part gave it weight and influence in England, unfitted it for our own meridian. We cannot be expected to be moved by the glory of her naval warfare, or to feel the power of appeals based on the extent of her commerce. As far as the argument is grounded on m m tilings which are as true of the American as the Eng- lish sailor, it would be impertinent to make any alter- ations. It has been our object, therefore, to make the Essay an appeal by Mr. Ilariis to the Christians of America, on the moral claims of our own seamen. — We judged it indispensable to this end, that appeals to sympatliies peculiarly English, should be erased, and that the statistics of our own commerce and be- nevolent operations in behalf of seamen should be sub- stituted for those of England. The original title of Britannia has been rejected, and from the various sub- stitutes which have occurred to us, we have selected (not without distrust) that of Zebulon, the name of the tribe in Israel who dwelt by the " haven of ships." We are not aware of having taken greater liberties with the work, than was necessary to our object, or than is common in England with the productions of American authors. We hope Mr. Harris will not consider his Essay barnacled by its passage across the Atlantic. If it shall appear to him to have suffered at our hands, he will impute it to an honest, though mis- guided desire that he " might have some fruit among us also, even as among other Gentiles." Ai^iERiCAN Editors. This uwrk is just issued ; but has received high com- mendations from the press, and seems destined to enjoy the same popularity as its predecessor, "Mammon." From the Christian Register. The work has been so far altered by its American Editors, as to adapt it to the peculiarities of our na- tion in regard to the condition and wants of our sea- men. For which liberty, those who are concerned have made in the introduction an apology, undoubted- ly suthcient to the English author. The book bears the same indubitable mark of genius and piety as do most of the other productions of the same mind. It is destined to have an extensive circulation; and will undoubtedly accomplish a great deal towards direct- ing the attention and liberality of Christians to a high- ly important, nmnerous, deserving, and at the same time greatly neglected and abused class of our breth- ren. From Zion's Arlvocnlc, Portland. We havecursonl}' read it, and arc prepared to say it well su>tains ihe )ii,:;^di reputation wliich the i,Mfted au- thor has gained by liis'lbrmer highly talented pro- ductions. The introduction, by tic American editors, is an interesting article, in which are exhibited the great advantages of the " Sailors' Home." We are much pleased with all the contents of this volume. It is written in the usual glowing style of the author. It pleads the cause of this too much neglected class of our fellow-creatures as we have never known it to be advocated baihre. Surely, he will receive a thousand blessings from the hardy sons of the ocean. We were hardly aware, before we read this Essay, of the faintncss nnd feebleness of the ellbrls that have been made to enlighten and Christianize seamen— nor were we prepared to believe that their situation wag so degraded in morals. From tlic Morning Post. It is a good book, and should be bought and I'cad. From tlio Americ:in Traveller. The English copy has been revised and adapted to our own country, arui the Essay will have a wide cir- culation, and do immense good." From tho Mercantile Journal. It is a prize Essay, the production of Rev. John H;irris, the gifted author of "Mammon," and we doubt not will be gladly welcomed, and be the mcfuis of doing much good. From the Christian VVutcliman. We have read the Essay of Mr. Harris on the con- dition of seamen, and on the best manner of improv- ing their condition, with much satisf-iciion ; and we hardly know which most to admire, the ability with which the autlu^r has accomplished las undertak- mg, or the benevolence of his design. * * The pub- ■m lishers have done the cause of American seamen a valuable service by a reprint of this excellent work. From the New Bedford Mercury. This is a little work which is calculated to com- mend itself to all interested in the moral advance- ment of seamen. It is the production of the gifted author of" Mammon," which has had an extensive circulation in this country. MAMMON — Prize Essay: OR, COVETOUSNESS THE SIN OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH. BY REV. JOHN HARRIS, Author of the "Great Teacher." THIRD AMERICAN, FROM THE TWENTIETH LONDON BDITIOW. This Work has already engaged the attention of Churclies and individuals, and receives the highest commendations. The publishers take pleasure in pre- senting the follovnng united recommendation from cler- gymen in this city. "Having read the prize Essay of the Rev. John Harris, entitled ' Mammon, or Covetousness the Sin of the Christian Church,' we cordially recommend it as deserving the serious perusal of the professed fol- lowers of Christ. " Its general circulation will be a powerful means of increasing the spirituality of the churches, and of advancing every good work which depends in any measure upon pecuniary contributions. R. Anderson, Wm. Hague, Lucius BoUes, David Greene, George B. Ide, Abel Stevens^ Da7iiel Sharp, Geo. W. Blagden, Wm. Jenks, Wm. M. Rogers. J. H. Fair child, A. Boies, Jotham Horton, S. S. Mallery, D. M, Lord, Baron Stmv, HiMard Winslow, E, Thresher^ ^m rejiiiui en tt> nefl li/'nf lii<> inii •> < I'x'i^ /////) '/ ir 1 It / /A , , 1 ^ ' ' "" [("J lit MAMMON: COVETOUSNESS THE SIN OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH. BY REV. JOHN HARRIS, AUTHOR or THE "GREAT TEACHER." THIRD AMERICAN, FROM THE TWENTIETH LONDON EDITION. BOSTON: GOULD, KENDALL & LINCOLN No. 59 Wasliington Street. 1837. Printed by Wm. A. Hall & Co. TO T. CONaUEST, ESa. M.D., F.L.S., &c. ORIGINATED BY ins LIBERALITY, AND ACCOMPANIED BY THE PRAYER THAT IT MAY PROMOTE HIS BENEVOLENT OBJECT, IS RESPECTFULLY INSCRIBED BY THE AUTHOR. PUBLISHER'S NOTICE. TO THE SECOND EDITION. The rapid sale of the first edition of this work, made it necessary to put to press a sec- ond, very soon after its pubHcation. It has been very extensively reviewed, both in this country and in Europe ; and the publishers feel justified in saying, that few religious works, that have appeared of late years, have produced more sensible effect on the religious community, or have received more itniversal encomiums, than " Mammon ! " Certainly no work could be better devised, or more faith- fully executed, to counteract the prevaiUng sin of the times. As an evidence of the popularity of the work in England, it is suflicient to give the testimony of a highly respectable clergyman, of London, who states in a communication lately received, "We have exhausted the tenth edition. Ten thousand copies have been sold — this is a sale which no writer has command- Vi NOTICE. ed since Scott — certainly no religions author." The desirableness of having a cheaj)er edition has been snggested by some who have interest- ed themselves in the gratuitous distribution of the work. The publishers are therefore happy to comply with the suggestion, by putting it in a somewhat different shape. Boston, Feb. 1837. NOTICE TO THE THIRD EDITION. The sale of Four Thousand copies of this popular work, within one year from its first ap- pearance in this country, together with the fact that it has reached its "Twentieth Thou- sand" in England, is conclusive evidence of its pecuHar adapiedness to the times, as well as its own intrinsic merits ; — the present demand for it is greater than ever before, and it is hoped that it may be read, circulated, and its beneficial effects felt in every part of our country. October^ 1837. r X PRIITCSTOII v. CONTENTS. PART I. SELFISHNESS THE ANTAGONIST OF THE GOSPEL. PAGE. Sect. 1. — The Universe designed to display and enjoy the Love of God 17 Sect. 2. — Sin, as Selfishness, is the frustration of the Divine Plan 20 Sect. 3.— All Sin is Selfishness. 23 Sect. 1. — The Gospel, as a System of Benevolence, op- posed to Selfishness 26 Sect. 5. — Selfishness, the Sin of the World, heis long since become the Sin of the Church - - 38 Sect. 6. — The Forms of Selfishness in the Church - 42 PART II. COVETOUSNESS THE PRINCIPAL FORM OP SELFISHNESS — IN ITS NATURE, FORMS, PREVALENCE, ESPECIALLY IN BRITAIN — DISGUISES, TESTS, EVILS, DOOM, AND PLEAS. Sect. 1.— The Nature of Covetousness 57 Sect. 2. — Forms of Covetousness 61 Sect. 3. — Prevalence of Covetousness 65 Vll CONTENTS, Sect. 4.— The present Predominance of Covetousness m Britain 81 Sect. 5. — The Disguises of Covetousness - - - - 97 Sect. 6. — Tests of Covetousness - - - 106 Sect. 7. — The Guilt and Evils of Covetousness - - 119 Sect. 8. — The Doom of Covetousness ------ 156 Sect. 9. — Excuses of Covetousness for its want of Lib- erality - 168 PART III. CHRISTUN LIBERALITY EXPLAINED AND ENFORCED. Sect. 1. — Christian Liberality explained - - - - 205 Sect. 2. — Christian Liberality enforced 221 '4. theological/ ORIGINAL ADVERTISEMENT. Many of the wisest and best of men are of opinion, that there is no sin so prevalent among professors of the Gospel as the lore of money, and )'et there is no subject on which so little has" been written well. The late Andrew Fuller says, " It will, in all probability, prove the eternal over- throw of more characters among professing people than any other sin, because it is almost the only crime which can be indulged, and a profession of religion at the same lime supported." One hundred guineas, besides the profits of its publication, will be presented to the author of the best essay on this subject. Preference will be given to the most scriptural, poignant, and aflectionate appeal to the judgment and conscience of those who professedly recog- nise the authority of revelation, on avaricious hoarding, and on unchristian-like expenditure to gratify the lust of the eye and the pride of life, whilst they avow their obliga- tions to redeeming mercy, and profess that themselves and all they have is not their own, but belongs and must be accounted for to Him Avho has said, " Occupy till I come ; " then " give an account of thy stewardship, for thou mayest be no longer steward." The work wanted is one that will bear on selfishness, as it leads us to live to ourselves, and not for God and our fellow-men. It is re- quested that reference may be made to the different esti- mates of man who blesseth, and of God who abhorreth the covetous. Psalm x.3; and to the tremendous consequences of accumulating property, as this sin is associated with the 2 VIU ORIGINAL ADVERTISEMENT. vilest of crimes, which exclude from the kingdom of heaven, Ephes, v. 5, The manuscript is to be sent to Dr. Conquest, 13 Finsbury-Square, on or before the 1st of November, 1835, with a sealed letter containing the address of the writer. The Hon, and Rev, Baptist Noel, and the Rev. Dr. Pye Smith, have kindly engaged to be the ai'bi- trators, and the award will be" adjudged on the first of May, 1836. ADJUDICATORS' ADVERTISEMENT. In the early part of the last year, we were made ac- quainted with the proposal of a Christian friend, John Trickey Conquest, Esq., M. D., F. L. S. to confer a prize of one hundred guineas, (which, with the accompanying expenses, amounts to the donation of about one hundred and fifty guineas,) upon any Essay produced in competi- tion, with the usual precautions to preserve the secrecy of the authors, upon the sin or Covetolsness-, particularly with regard to the duties of piety and beneficence, Avhich, at the present time, are so incumbent on all men, but espe- cially on those who would not abdicate the name of Christ- ians. The request was made that we would be the um- pires in determining to whom, in such a friendly competi- tion, that prize would be the most righteously due. To that request we assented with many feelings of difficulty and reluctance; but the opinion of duty induced us to sup- press theriL The requisite care was taken, that, till we had given our decision, we should not have the slightest knowledge, or any ground of conjecture whatsoever, concerning the wri- ters of the Essays, wliich were no fewer than one hundred and forty-three. After much thought, and humbly seeking, by prayer and supplication, that we might be enabled to form a right judgment, we saw it to be our duty to declare the work now given to the public, to be the one entitled to Dr. Con- quest's munificent prize. But we did not arrive at this X adjudicators' advertisement. determination, without a high feeling of gratitude and ad- miration at the mass of sanctified talent which had been brought before our view. Many of the Treatises, some of which are considerable volumes, are so replete with knowledge of the divine word, of the heart and character of man, and are so marked with comprehensive research, deep penetration, and Christian candor, as to have made us feel considerable regret at the thought of their being withheld from the public. We are conscientiously satis- fied with the decision which we thus announce; but it is, at the same time, our earnest desire that some others of the Essays should be published. We are persuaded that the subject is not exhausted; and if, by the respective au- thors, our request for the publication should be granted,we trust the great cause of religion will be eminently served, and that the minds of those excellent persons will enjoy the delight which flows from extensive and the most important usefulness. J. PYE SMITH. BAPTIST W. NOEL. Near London, June 3, 183G. •7 PEIXTCHTOII ^^. PREFACE The history of this Essay is sufficiently- explained by the Advertisements prefixed. But concerning its plarij as the reader may possibly expect that the following pages are confined exclusively to the subject of Covet- ousness, the writer may be permitted to state the reasons which have led him to introduce two other topics — Selfishness, and Christian Liberality. A glance at the original advertisement will show, that while the sin of covetousness was the principal object in the eye of the benevo- lent Proposer, yet it was viewed and spoken of by liim only as a part of the great system of selfishness. The writer felt himself, there- fore, not merely permitted, but virtually re- quired, to give this parent evil a primary place in his Essay. He is, however, free to confess, that had he not done so from a sense of obligation, he should most likely have done 2* Xll PREFACE. it from choice, since he deems it an appropri- ate introduction to the principal subject. On this account, then. Selfishness, as the great antagonist of Christianity, and the source of covetousness, forms the First Part. Covetousness — the prevailing form of self- ishness — is the Second and principal Part. Had the writer concluded with this part, he could not have considered the Essay com- plete, unless a closing section has been added, on the Cure of the evil under consideration. In that case, it would have been obvious to insist on a variety of familiar prudential max- ims. But the love of money can only be remedied by " the expulsive power of a new affection." If we would not have the ivy to creep on the ground, we must erect an object which it can embrace, and, by embracing, as- cend ; and if we would detach the heart from embracing the dust, we must give to it another and a nobler object. The utter ineiScacy of every thing short of this is evident. Hippoc- rates advised a consultation of all the phy- sicians in the world for the cure of covetous- ness. The animadversions and appeals of Socrates not only failed to remedy the evil as it existed at Athens, but, judging from certain expressions in Plato's Apology of Socrates, they were the means of enraging his enemies, and of procuring his condemnation. And about the time that the apostle Paul was de- PREFACE. Xni nouncing tlie sin, in his epistle to Timothy, Seneca was decrying the same evil, and com- posing his ethics ; but, as if to show the im- potence of his own precepts, "he was accused of having amassed the most ample riches," — a circumstance which, though not the ostensi- ble, was no doubt the real cause of his finally falling a victim to the jealousy of Nero. But if such be the ineflicacy of the precepts of the heathen philosopher, what is the prescription of the Christian apostle ? Aware that the same means which destroy cupidity produce liberality, he does not concern himself so much with the death of covetousness as with the birth of charity. He says less about the sin when seeking its removal, than about the duty which is to displace it. He commands benevolence. He enjoins the "man of God" not only to Jlee the evil, but to follow the op- posite virtues, and to flee the one by following the other. " O man of God, flee these things ; and follow after righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, meekness .... Charge them that are rich in this world .... that they do good, that they bo rich in good works, ready to distribute, willing to communicate ; laying up in store for themselves a good foundation against the time to come, that they may lay hold on eternal life," Instead, therefore, of ending with a section on the cure of covetousness, the writer thinks XIV PREFACE. he has copied inspired example, and increased the practical effect of the Essay, and better consulted the intentions of the party who has occasioned it, by adding a Third Part, on Christian Liberahty. The cross of Christ is not merely a perpetual protest against the selfishness of the world ; it has given a new object to our affections, and a new motive to our obedience — that object is Christ, and that motive is the love we bear to him. Till this love possess us, the subhmest maxims fail to reach the heart ; but from the moment we begin to be actuated by it, cupidity and all the baser passions are doomed to destruction. Diodorus Siculus relates that the forest of the Pyrenean mountains being set on fire, and the heat penetrating to the soil, a pure stream of silver gushed forth from the bosom of the earth and revealed, for the first time, the ex- istence of those rich lodes afterwards so cele- brated. Covetousness yields up its pelf for sacred uses as unwillingly as if it were ap- pointed to succeed the earth in the office of holding and concealing it ; but, let the melt- ing influence of the cross be felt, let the fire of the gospel be kindled in the church, and its ample stores shall be seen flowing forth from their hidden recesses, and becoming " the fine gold of the sanctuary." The title which the writer has adopted for the Essay designates covetousness the sin of PREFACE. XV tlio Christian church. He is aware that by bringing even an ordinary evil near to the eye, and prolonging one's gaze at it, it may go on swelling and enlarging in the appre- hension, till it has come to fill the whole sphere of vision, to the exclusion and tempo- rary oblivion of other evils of superior masf- nitude. That covetousness is not the only evil which the Christian church has to con- fess — that it is only one of many evils — he is quite insensible ; and he trusts that the view which he has taken of its surpassing enor- mity is by no means chargeable with the ef- fect of lessening our convictions of those other evils. All the sins of the Christian church stand closely related ; by action and reac- tion they are constantly producing and strengthening each other ; and it is to its su- perior activity and influence in the produc- tion of those other sins that cupidity owes its bad pre-eminence. If the love of money then be the root of the evils in question, a descrip- tion of its deadly nature should have the ef- fect, not of diminishino^, but auofmentins: our aversion to its destructive fruits. The writer feels convinced that the best mode of acquiring a clear, comprehensive and impressive view of all the existinsf defects of the Christian church, as a whole, is to view them first sep- arately and in succession ; and that he who succeeds in laying open and correcting one .« XVI PREFACE, of these defects, has gone far towards reme- dying all the rest. With the sincere desire that he maybe the means of inflicting if only a single blow on the root of all evil, and of thus aiding the growth of that plant "which is from above .... full of mercy and of good fruits," he would place this Essay at the feet of Him who deigns to commend the wid- ow's mite. PART THE FIRST. SELFISHNESS THE ANTAGONIST OF THE GOSPEL. .•;^ raiiTGETGii x-. ■/ V, ^.THSOLQGI SECTION I. THE UNIVERSE DESIGNED TO DISPLAY AND ENJOY THE LOVE OF GOD. " God is love :" — and the true theory of the universe is, that it is a vehicle or medium con- structed expressly for the circulation and diffu- sion of his love. Full of blessedness himself, his goodness burst forth, at first into a celestial creation, replenished with bright intelligences, invested with the high prerogative of approach- ing as near to the Fountain of excellence as cre- ated natures can, to derive their happiness imme- diately from himself, and to derive it to the full amount of their capacity for enjoyment. But heaven, with all its amplitude, was too confined for Infinite Love; he must enlarge the sphere of his beneficence; again his unconfined goodness overflowed, and this terrestrial creation appeared — an enlargement of heaven. On that occasion, however, he chose to diversify the form of his love in the production of man, — a creature whose happiness, though equally with that of IS THE LOVE OF GOD. angels derived from Himself, should reach him through more indirect and circuitous channels. By creating, at first, one common father of the species, he designed that each individual should feel himself allied to all the rest, and pledged to promote their happiness. And by rendering us necessary to each other's welfare, he sought to train us to an humble imitation of his own good- ness, to teach us the divine art of benevolence — to find and fabricate our own happiness from the happiness of others. Now, if the former, the angelic creation, was meant to exemplify how much his creatures could cnjoi/, the latter was intended to show how nmch they could impart; for he meant every heart and every hand to be a consecrated chan- nel for his love to flow in. Had his great idea been realised, the world would have exhibited the glorious spectacle of a whole race in family compact; clothed in a robe of happiness, with charity for a girdle ; feasting at a perpetual ban- quet of beneficence ; hailing the accession of every new-born member as the advent of an an- gel, an addition to their common fund of enjoy- ment ; and finding greater blessedness than that of passively receiving happiness in exercising the godlike |)rerogative of imparting it ; — a whole order of intelligent beings, having one heart, and one mind ; a heart beating in concert with heav- en, and ditfusing, with every pulse, life, and health, and joy, to the remotest members of the body. The mere outline of the scene, as sketch- THE LOVE OF GOD. 19 ed by God in pnrndisc, called forth audible ex- pressions of his divine coni[)laccncy ; on survey- in*^ it from the hei<;ht of the excellent fj^lory, he pronounced it ^^ood, and the light of his counte- nance fell upon it. SECTION II SIN, AS SELFISHNESS, IS THE FRUSTRATION OF THE DIVINE PLAN, But the awful invasion of sin frustrated the divine intention, destroyed it even in its type and model. Man aspired to be as God; and, from that fatal moment, his great quarrel with his Maker has been, a determination to assert a state of independence altogether alien to his nature and condition. The standard of revolt was then erected, and the history of all his subsequent conduct has been the history of an insane en- deavor to construct an empire, governed by laws and replenished with resources, indepen- dent of God. The idolatry and sensuality, the unbelief, irreligion, and all the multiform sins of man, are resolvable into this proud and infernal attempt. Having by his apostacy cut himself off from God, he affects to be a god to himself, to be his own sufficiency, his own first and last. Such, however, is the intimate dependence of man on man, that it is impossible for him to at- SIN, A FRUSTRATION OF GOd's PLAN. 21 tempt to realize this enormous fiction without being brought, at every step, into violent collision with the interest of his fellows. Love to God is the all-combining principle which was to hold each individual in adhesion to all the rest, and the whole in affinity with God ; the loss of that, therefore, like the loss of the great law of at- traction in the material world, leaves all the several parts in a state of repulsion to each other, as well as the whole disjoined from God. Hav- ing lost its proper centre in God, the world at- tempts not to find any common point of repose, but spends itself in fruitless efforts to erect an infinity of independent interests. Every king- dom and province, every family, every individual, discovers a propensity to insulate himself from the common brotherhood, and to constitute him- self the centre of an all-subordinating and ever- enlarging circle. Such is the natural egotism of the heart, that each individual, following his unrestrained bent, acts as if he were a whole kingdom in himself, and as if the general well- being depended on subjection to his supremacy. Setting up for himself, to the exclusion of every other being, he would fain be his own end, — the reason of all he does. Under the disorganizing influence of sin, then, the tendency of mankind is towards a state of universal misanthropy; and were it not that some of their selfish ends can be attained only by partial confederations, the world would disband, society in all its forms would break up, every man's hand would be turned into a weapon, and 22 SIN, A FRUSTRATION OF GOD S PLAN. all the earth become a battle-fiekl, in which the issues to be decided would be as numerous as the combatants, so that tlie conllict could end only with the destruction of every antaffonist. There is, be it observed, a wide difference between selfishness and legitimate selt-love. This is a principle necessary to ail sentient existence. In man, it is the principle which impels him to preserve his own life, and promote his own hap- piness. Not only is it consistent with ])iety, it is the stock on which all piety, in lapsed man, is grafted. Piety is only the principle of self-love, carried out in the right direction, and seeking its supreme hapj)iness in God. It is the act or habit of a man who so loves himself that he gives himself to God. Selfishness is, fallen self-love. It is self-love in excess, blind to the existence and excellence of God, and seeking its happiness in inferior objects, by aiming to subdue them to its own purposes. SECTION III ALf, SIN IS SEf-FISHNESS. Accordingly, selfishness, as we have already intimated, is the universal form of human de- pravity ; every sin that can be named is only a modification of it. What is avarice, but selfish- ness graspinjr and hoarding ? What is prodigal- ity, but selfishness decorating and indulging it- self — a man sacrificing to himself as his own god ? What is sloth, but tliat god asleep, and refusing to attend to the loud calls of duty 1 And wliat is idolatry, but that god enshrined — man, worshipping the reflection of his own im- age ? Sensuality, and, indeed, all the sins of the flesh, are only selfishness setting itself above law, and gratifying itself at the expense of all restraint. And all the sins of the spirit are only the same principle impatient of contradiction, and refusing to acknowledge superiority, or to bend to any will but its own. What is egot- ism, but selfishness speaking ? Or crime, but selfishness, without its mask, in earnest, and 3* 24 ALL SIN IS SELFISHNESS. acting ? Or offensive war, but selfishness con- federated, armed, and bent on aggrandizing it- self by violence and blood ? An offensive army is the selfishness of a nation embodied, and mov- ing to the attainment of its object over the wrecks of human happiness and life. "From whence come wars and fighting among you? Come they not hence, even of your lusts ? " And what are all these irregular and passionate desires, but that inordinate self-love which ac- knowledges no law, and will be confined by no rules — that selfishness which is the heart of de- pravity ? — and what but this has set the world at variance, and filled it with strife ? The first presumed sin of the angels that kept not their first estate, as well as the first sin of man, — what was it but selfishness insane 1 an irrational and mad attempt to pass the limits proper to the creature, to invade the throne, and to seize the rights, of the Deity ? And were we to analyze the very last sin of which we ourselves are con- scious, we should discover that selfishness, in one or other of its thousand forms, was its parent. Thus, if love was the pervading prin- ciple of the unfallen creation, it is equally cer- tain that selfishness is the reigning law of the world, ravaged and disorganized by sin. It must be obvious, then, that the great want of fallen humanity, is, a specific against selfish- ness, the epidemic disease of our nature. The expedient which should profess to remedy our condition, and yet leave this want unprovided for, whatever its other recommendations might ALL SIN IS SELFISHNESS. ^O be, would be leaving tlie seat and core of our disease unlouclicd. And it would be easy to show that in this radical defect consist the im- potence of every system of false religion, and of every heterodox modification of the true religion, to restore our disordered nature to happiness and God. And equally easy is it to show that the gospel, evangelically interpreted, not only takes cognizance of this peculiar feature of our mal- ady, but actually treats it as the very root of our depravity, and addresses itself directly to the task of its destruction, — that, as the first effect of sin was to produce selfishnesss, so the first ef- fect of the gospel remedy is to destroy that evil, and to replace it with benevolence. SECTION IV THE GOSPEL, AS A SYSTEM OF BENEVOLENCE, OPPOSED TO SELFISHNESS. It is the glory of the gospel that it was calcu- lated and arranged on the principle of restoring to the world the lost spirit of benevolence. To realise this enterprise of boundless mercy, Je- hovah resolved on first presenting to mankind an unparalleled exhibition of grace — an exhibition which, if it failed to rekindle the extinguished love of man, should, at least, have the effect of converting his angels into seraphs, and his ser- aphs into flames of fire. The ocean of the divine love was stirred to its utmost depths. The en- tire Godhead was — if with profound reverence it may be said — put into activity. The three glori- ous subsistencies in the Divine Essence moved towards our earth. Every attribute and distinc- tion of the Divine Nature was displayed : the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, em- barked their infinite treasures in the cause of human happiness. GOSPEL OrrOSED TO SELFISHNESS. 27 " God so loved the world, that he gave his only heorotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." He could not give us more ; and the vast propen- sions of his grace could not be satisfied by be- stowing less. He would not leave it possible to be said that he could give us more: he resolved to pour out the whole treasury of heaven, to give us his all at once. " Herein is love ! " — love de- fying all computation : the very mention of which should surcharge our hearts with gratitude, give us an idea of infinity, and replace our selfislmess with a sentiment of generous and ditfusive be- nevolence. Jesus Christ came into the world as the em- bodied love of God. He came and stood before the world with the hoarded love of eternity in his heart, offering to make us the heirs of all its wealth. He so unveiled and presented the char- acter of God, that every human being should feel it to be looking on himself, casting an aspect of benignity on himself " He pleased not him- self " lie did notliing for himself; whatever he did was for the advantage of man. Selfishness stood abashed in his presence. *' He went about doing good. " He assumed our nature expressly that he might be able to suffer in our stead ; for the distinct and deliberate object of pouring out its blood, and of making its soul an offering for sin. He ])lanted a cross, and presented to the world a prodigy of mercy of which this is the only solution, that he " so loved us. " " While we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. " He 28 took our place in the universe, absorbed our in- terest, opened his bosom, and welcomed to his heart the stroke which we deserved. And in all he did, he thought of the world. He loved man as man : he came to be the light and life of the world. He came and stood as the centre of attraction to a race of beings scattered and dissipated bj the repulsive power of selfish- ness. He proposed by the power of the cross to *' draw all men unto him. " His heart had room for the whole race ; and, opening his arms, he invited all to come unto him. The whole of his course was a history of pure and disinterested benevolence ; one continued act of condescen- sion ; a vast and unbroken descent from the heights of heaven, to the form of a servant, the life of an outcast, the death of a malefactor. His character is a study of goodness — a study for the universe ; it is the conception of a Being of infinite amiableness ; seeking to engage and enamor the heart of a selfish world. The world, having lost the original idea of goodness and sunk into a state of universal selfishness, his character was calculated and formed on the principle of a laborious endeavor to recall the departed spirit of benevolence — to baptize it afresh in the element of love. The oflSce of the Holy Spirit is appointed and concurs to the same end. Tlie world could not be surprised out of its selfishness, and charmed into benevolence by the mere spectacle even of divine love. Thcit love can be understood only by sympathy j but for this, sin had disqualified OPPOSED TO SELFISHNESS. 29 U8. According to the economy of grace, there- fore, the exhibition of that love in God is to be made the means of producing love in us; the glorious spectacle of love as beheld in God, is to be turned into a living principle in us. For this end, the holy, unconfined and infinite Spirit came down. His emblem is the wind : he came like a rushing mighty wind, came with a fulness and a power, as if he sought to fill every heart, to replenish the church, to be the soul of the world, to encircle the earth with an atmosphere of grace as real and universal as the elemental air which encompasses and circulates around the globe itself, that whoever inhaled it might have eternal life. In the prosecution of his office he was to take of the things of Christ, and show them unto men. Heaven stooping to earth ; God becoming man, dying upon the cross ; infinite benevolence pouring out all its treasures for human happi- ness, — these were the things which he was to re- veal, — the softening and subduing elements with which he was to apj^roach and enter the human heart. In his hands, these truths were to be- come spirit and life. From the moment they were felt, men were to be conscious of a change in their relation both to God and to each other. A view of the great love wherewith he had loved them, was to fill their minds with a grand and overpowering sentiment of benevolence, which should melt their obduracy, cause them to glow with gratitude, and bind them fast to himself in the strongest bands of love. That love, with all 30 THE GOSPEL, AS A SYSTEM, the communicativeness of fire was to extend to tlieir fellow-men. Every weapon of revenge was to fall from their hands ; every epithet of anger was to die on their lips ; and where, be- fore, they saw nothing bat foes, they were hence- forth to behold magnificent objects of affection, immortal beings, whom it would be happiness to love, and godlike to bless. The love of Christ would constrain them ; glowing and circulating in their spiritual system, like the life-blood in their hearts, it would impel them to be active for his glory. Having communed with the heart of Infinite Love, they were to go forth and mingle with their race, filled with a benevolence like that which brought their Lord from heaven. Placing themselves at his disposal, they were to find that they were no longer detached from the species, but restored and related to all around ; the sworn and appointed agents of happiness to the world. The institution of a church,' is only the con- tinuation and application of the great scheme of love. Its offices were not to terminate on itself. It was constructed on the principle of consoli- dating and facilitating the operations of divine benevolence upon the world. The Son of God — the great manifestation of that love — must per- sonally withdraw from the earth ; but his church, consisting of the aggregate of all on whom that love had taken effect, would continue to give vis- ibility and activity to that love. He stopped not at the bare exhibition of his grace, but turned ♦hat exhibition into a means of implanting a OPPOSED TO SELFISHNESS. 31 kindred principle of love in the human heart : he stopped not at the implantation of this principle, but instituted a church for the express ])urpose of enij)loyin<5 it for the benefit of the world ; of employinrj it on the largest scale and with the greatest effect, and of thus conferring on it the power of propagating itself. In the Christian church, every thing would conspire to keep alive in its members the new principle which Christ had brought into the world, and to give efficiency to its benign opera- tions. Love was the principle which would bring them together, which would draw them from their distant and detached position, harmo- nize their jarring natures, and fuse all their hearts and interests into one. ConverjriniT from tile most opposite points, they would meet at the cross ; and the principle which had drawn them to that would bind them to each other. Each would behold in every other a living memorial of his Lord ; and see, in the grace of Christ to the whole, a token of that grace to liimself in par- ticular. Here, love, as an agent or instrument, either giving or receiving, was to find itself in perpetual exercise, and to behold its image re- liected in every face. But Love is diffusive ; it would not confine its offices to those only who could repay them ; bursting the limits of the church, it would seek the world. Every heart in wliich it glowed find- ing itself allied to every other Christian heart, and the w hole feeling themselves reinforced with the benevolence of Heaven, would meditate the 1 32 THE GOSPEL, AS A SYSTEM, conversionof the world. As often as they ap- proached the throne of grace, they would find themselves touching the springs of universal and almighty love, — and would they not yearn to be- hold these springs in activity for the world ? As often as they thought of that love embracing themselves, their own love would burn with ten- fold fervor ; the selfishness of their nature would be consumed, the most enlarged designs of be- nevolence would seem too small, the most costly sacrifices too cheap ; they would feel as if they must precipitate themselves into some boundless field of beneficence ; as if they could only breathe and act in a sphere which knows no circumfer- ence. As often as they surveyed their infinite resources in Christ, and perceived that when all their own necessities were supplied those re- sources were infinite still, they would naturally remember the exigencies of others ; would feel that they had access to the whole, that they might instrumentally impart of that abundance to oth- ers. The feast would be prepared, the provi- sions infinite ; and when they were seated at the banquet,, and contrasted that plentitude of food with the fewness of the guests, they would con- ceive a fixed determination not to cease inviting till all the world should be sitting with them at the feast of salvation. The name they were to bear would perpetually remind them of him from whom they had derived it ; and would it be pos- sible for them to have their minds inhabited by the glorious idea of Christ without receiving cor- responding impressions of greatness ? — It would OPPOSED TO SELFISHNESS. 33 be associated in their minds with all things great, beneficent, godlike, impelling them to im- itate to the utmost his diffusive goodness. But not only their namc^ from him they would have derived their nature ; by necessity of nature, therefore, they would pant to behold universal happiness. Not only would they feel that every accession to their number was an increase of their happiness ; as long as the least portion of the world remained unblessed, and unsaved, they would feel that their happiness was incomplete. Nothing less than the salvation of the whole world would be regarded by them as the com- plement of their number, the fulfilment of their office, the consummation of their joy. Thus the Christian church, like the leaven hid in the meal, was to pervade and assimilate the entire mass of humanity. At first, it would re- semble an impcrium in impcriOy a dominion of love flourishing amidst arid wastes of selfishness ; but, extending on all sides its peaceful conquests, it would be seen transforming and encompassing the world. Combining and concentrating all the elements of moral power, it would move only to conquer, and conquer only to increase the means of conquest. It would behold its foes converted into friends; and then, assigning to each an appropriate station of duty, would bid him forthwith go and try upon others the power of that principle which had subdued his own op- position — the omnipotent power of love. Thus thawing, and turning into its own substance, the icy selfishness of humanity, the great principle 34 THE GOSPEL, AS A SYSTEM, of benevolence would flow through tlie world with all the majesty of a river, widening and deepening at every point of its progress by llie accession of a thousand streams, till it covered the earth as the waters cover the sea. Tiiey who, under the reign of selfishness, had souglit to contract the circle of happiness around them till they had reduced it to their own little centre, under the benign and expansive influence of the gospel, would not only seek to enlarge that circle to embrace the world, but to multiply and diffuse themselves in happiness to its utmost circum- ference. Feeling that good is indivisible ; that to be enjoyed in perfection by one, it must be shared and possessed by all, they would labor till all the race were blended in a family com- pact, and were partaking together the rich bless- ings of salvation; till, by their instrumentality, the hand of Christ had carried a golden chain of love around the world, binding the whole togeth- er, and all to the throne of God. It is clear, then, that the entire economy of salvation is constructed on the principle of re- storing to the world the lost spirit of love : this is its boast and glory. Its advent was an era in the universe. It was bringing to a trial the rel- ative strength of love and hatred ; — the darling principle of heaven, and the great principle of all revolt and sin. It was confronting selfishness in its own native region, with a system of benevo- lence prepared, as its avowed antagonist, by the hand of God itself So that, unless we would impugn the skill and power of its Author, we OPPOSED TO SELFISHNESS. 35 must suppose that it was studiously adapted for the lofty encounter. With this conviction, there- fore, we should have been justified in saying, had we been placed in a situation to say it, " Nothing but the treachery of its professed friends can de- feat it : if they attempt a compromise with the spirit of selfishness, there is every thing to be feared ; but let the heavenly system be worked fairly, and there is every thing to be expected, — its triumph is certain." But has its object been realised 1 More than eighteen hundred years have elapsed since it was brought into operation, — has its design suc- ceeded ? Succeeded ! Alas ! the question seems a taunt, a mockery. We pass, in thought, from the picture we have drawn of what the gospel was intended to effect, to the contemplation of things as they are, and the contrast appals us. We lift our eyes from the picture, and, like a person awaking from a dream of happiness to find the cup of wretchedness in his hand, the pleasing vision has fled. Selfishness is every- where rife and rampant. But why is it thus ? why has the gospel been liitherto threatened with the failure of a mere liuinan experiment 1 When first put into activi- ty did it dicover any want of adaptation to its professed purpose ? The recollection that God is its author, forbids the thought. It is the wis- dom of God, and the poicer of God. But be- sides this, as if to anticipate the question, and to suggest the only reply, — as if in all ages to agi- tate an inquiry int6 the apparent inefficacy of 4- 36 THE GOSPEL, AS A SYSTEM, the gospel, and to flash conviction in the face of the church as often as the question is raised, when first the gospel commeiiced its career, it tri- umphed in every place. No form of selfishness could stand before it. It went forth conquer- ing and to conquer. " And all that believed were together, and had all things common ; and sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need." They went every where, preaching the gospel. They felt that they held in their hands the bread of life for a famishing world, and they " could not but" break and dispense it. The love of Christ con- strained them. As if his last command were constantly sounding in their ears, they burned to preach the gospel to every creature. They felt the dignity and glory of their position, that they were constituted trustees for the world ; executors of a Savior who had bequeathed hap- piness to man ; guardians of the most sacred lights in the universe. In the execution of their godlike trust, death confronted them at every step : persecution, armed, brought out all its ap- paratus of terror and torture, and planted itself full in their path : but none of these things moved them ; they scarcely saw them ; they went on prosecuting their lofty task of making the world happy, for they were actuated by a love stronger than death. The world was taken by surprise, — never before had it beheld such men, — every thing gave way before them, — city after city, and province after province, capitu- lated, — yet the whole secret of their i)ower was OPPOSED TO SELFISHNESS. 37 love. Diversified as they were in mind, country, condition, age — one interest prevailed ; one sub- ject of emulation swallowed up every other — wliich should do most for the enlargement of the reign of love. A fire had been kindled in the earth, which consumed the selfishness of men wherever it came. SECTION V SELFISHNESS, THE SIN OF THE WORLD, HAS LONG SINCE BECOME THE SIN OF THE CHURCH. Again, then, we repeat the momentous in- quiry, — and we would repeat it slowly, solemnly, and with a desire to receive the full impression of the only answer whicH can be given to it; — what has prevented the gospel from fulfilling its first promise, and completely taking effect? what has hindered it from filling every heart, every province, the whole world, the entire mass of humanity, with the one spirit of divine be- nevolence ? why, on the contrary, has the gos- pel, the great instrument of divine love, been threatened, age after age, with failure 1 Ozving, soldi/, to the treachery of tJiosc icJio have had the administraiion of it ; owing, entirely, to the selfishness of the church. No element essential to success has been left out of its arrangements ; all those elements have always been in the pos- session of the church ; no new form of evil has arisen in the world; no antagonist has appeared SELFISHNESS, THE SIN OF THE CHURCH. 39 there which the gospel did not encounter and subdue in its first onset ; yet, at this advanced stage of its existence, when it oujrht to be repos- ing from the conquest of the world, the church listens to an account of its early triumph, as if they were meant only for wonder, and not for imitation ; as if they partook too much of the romance of benevolence to be again attempted ; — now, when it ought to be holding the world in fee, it is barely occupying a few scattered ])rovii)ces, as if by sufferance, and has to begin its conflicts again. And, we repeat, the only adequate explanation of this appalling fact is, that selfishness, the sin of the world, has become the jn'cvailing sin of the church. Uhis statement, indeed, may, at first sight, ap- pear inconsistent with the truth, that the church is the only depository and instrument of divine benevolence. But to reconcile the two, it is only necessary to remember that every component part of that church, each Christian heart, taken individually, is only an epitome of the state of the world — partially sanctified, and partially depraved — containing in it, indeed, a divine principle of renovation, and a principle which is destined finally to triumph, but which has, mean- while, to maintain its ground by perpetual con- flict, and, at times, to struggle even for existence. While viewed collectively, the church may be legarded in the light of a vast hospital, filled with those who are all, indeed, under cure, but who have all to complain of the inveteracy of their disease, and of the consequent slowness of 40 SELFISHNESS, THE SIN OF THE WORLD. the healing process. It depends, therefore, o'^ the degree to which they avail themselves of the means of recovery, whether or not they shall become active and instrumental in the recovery of their perishing fellow-men. And the charge alleged against them, is, that they have not aban- doned themselves to the divine specific, the great remedy of the gospel ; in consequence of which, they continue to labor all their life-time under the disqualifying effects of their original disease, and their healing instrumentality is entirely lost to the diseased and dying world. Selfishness, the disease of the world^ is the prevailing malady of the church. It would be easy and interesting to trace the steps of that awful transition by which the church passed from the ardor of its first love, to the cold selfishness which it afterwards exhibited. View- ed in its primitive state, it appears a flaming sacrifice, offering itself up in the fires of a self- consuming zeal for the salvation of the world. But viewed again after the lapse of a few centu- ries — how changed the spectacle ! — it is offering up that very world to its own selfishness ! Its own fires are burnt out ; and it is seen kindling the strange fires of another sacrifice ; devoting and presenting the world as a victim at its vari- ous shrines of wealth, and pride, and power. From being an image of the divine disinterested- ness and love, extorting the admiration of the world, and winning men to an imitation of its benevolence, it passed through the various stages of spiritual declension, calculating consequences, SELFISHNESS, THE SIN OF THE CHURCH. 41 growing indifferent to its peculiar duties, turning its influence into worldly channels, subordinating every tiling sacred to worldly greatness and gain, till it had become a monstrous personification of an all-grasping selfishness, from which the world itself might derive hints and lessons on the art of self-aggrandizement, but derive them in vain for its own escape. Instead, however, of enlarging on the early op- erations of selfishness, it will be more relevant to the design before us to show the fact and mode of its operation in the church at present. For long and triumphant as its reign has been, its days are numbered. The gospel is not to sustain a final defeat. The church of Christ is yet to realise the glorious intentions of its Heav- enly Founder — to re-fill the world with love. Its failure hitherto is only to be regarded in the light of a severe, indeed, but temporary reverse. Its final victory is not contingent. The past has, at least, demonstrated its vitality; the present is evincing its elasticity; the future shall bear wit- ness to its triumphs, so that in aiming to indicate the movements and operations of its great antag- onist, selfishness, we feel that wc are contribut- ing, in however humble a degree, to retrieve its lost honors, and to point it the way to victory. SECTION VI THE FORMS OF SELFISHNESS IN THE CHURCH. Of selfishness it may be said, as of its arche- type. Satan, that it "takes all shapes that serve its dark designs." One of the most frequent forms in which it appears is that of ])arty spirit ; and which, for the sake of distinction, may be denominated the selfishness of the sect. Circum- stances, perhaps, inevitable to humanity in its present probationary state, have distributed the Christian church into sections ; but as the points of difference, which have divided it, are, /or the most part, of much less importance than the vital points in which these sections agree, there is nothing in the nature of such differences to ne- cessitate more than circumstantial division : there is every thing in their principles of agreement to produce and perpetuate substantial oneness, and cordial love. But this the demon of selfish- ness forbids. It erects the points of difference into tests of piety. It resents any real, dignity otiered by the world to the entire church, far less FORMS OF SELFISHNESS IN THE CHURCH. 43 than it resents any supjiosed insult ofi'ered by other .sections of the church to its own party. Tile general welfare is nothing in its eye, com- pared with its own particular aggrandizement. When Christians should have been making com- mon cause against the world, selfishness is call- ing on its followers to arm, and, turning each section of the church into a battlemented for- tress, frowns defiance on all the rest. It is blind to the fact, that God, meanwhile is employing them all, and smiling upon them all; or, if compelled to behold it, eyeing it askance with a feeling which prevents it from rejoicing in their joy. When the church should have been spending its energies for the good of man, de- voting its passions like so much consecrated fuel, for offering up the great sacrifice of love which God is waiting to receive, it is wasting its feelings in the fire of unholy contention, till that fire has almost become its native element. And thus Christianity is made to present to the eye of an indiscriminating world, the unamiable\ and paradoxical spectacle of a system which has \ the power of attracting all classes to itself, but '^ of repelling them all from each other — forget- ting, that in the former they see Christianity triumphing over selfishness, and in the latter selfishness defeating Christianity. Bigotry is another of the forms in which an inordinate self-love delights — the selfishness of the creed. In this capacity, as in the former, its element is to show division where nothing should be seen but union among the members of the 5 44 THE FORMS OF SELFISHNESS family of Christ. The great scheme of mercy originated in a love which consented to overlook the enmity and tierce rebellion of its objects, or rather, which looked on that enmity only to pity and provide for its removal ; but those who pro- fess to have been the objects of that love, will not allow each other the liberty of the sliglitest conscientious difierence, without resenting that difference as as a personal and meditated atiront ; as if the natural enmity of their hearts against God had only changed its direction, and had found its legitimate objects in his people. Under a pretence of zeal for God, bigotry violates the sanctuary of conscience, and creates an inquisi- tion in the midst of the church. Erecting its own creed into a standard of universal belief, it would fain call down fire from heaven, or kindle a furnace seven times hotter than an ordinary anger would demand, for all who presume to question its infalliblity : — thus justifying the world in representing the odium theologicum as a concentration of all that is fierce, bitter, and destructive, in the human heart. The Lord they profess to obey, would have them to embrace with a comprehensive affection all who exhibit the least traces of his image ; but the strongest traits, the most marked conformity to his like- ness, is a very uncertain introduction to their hearts compared with a likeness of creed. Nearly akin to this is, what, for the sake of convenience, may be denominated the selfishness of the pulpit ; that fearful spirit which presumes to limit what God meant to be universal — the IN THE CHURCH, 45 overtures of redemption to a ruined world. Self- isliness, indeed, in this repulsive form, is of comparjitively limited existence ; and as if by a judicial arraug^ement of providence, it is com- monly, in our day, associated with errors and tempers so unamiahle that its own nature forbids it to become general. It daringly undertakes to "number Israel;" to determine not only that few will be saved, but who that few will be. Its ministers, faithful to their creed, stand before the cross, and hide it, lest men should see it who are not entitled or intended to behold it ; — a danger which they jealously avoid, a respon- sibility they would tremble to incur. The j^ospel charters redemption to the world, — but they have heard that there are divine decrees; and until they can logically reconcile their views of the divine inflexd)ility with the universality of the divine compassion, the charter must stand over, and souls perish unwept; and the gospel of Christ, God's great gift, the adequate image of the infinitude of his love, be branded with tlie stigma of exclusiveness. Put the aflairs of the kingdom of Christ into their hands, — and, under the affectation of a pious dread of contravening the sovereign purposes of God, or of forestalling his appointed time, — they would forthwith call home the agents of mercy in distant lands, break up the institutions, and stop the whole machinery of Christian benevolence. In the midst of a famishing world, they would establish a monopoly of the bread of life; and, though assailed on all sides by the cries of a race in the pains of death, 46 THE FORMS OF SELFISHNESS would not cease to exchange smiles radiant with self-complacency while continuing to cater to their own pampered appetites. " Lord, lay not this sin to their charge." " Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do." They know not that they are perverting that which was meant to be the destruction of selfishness, into its very aliment and nurse ; they know not, that, next to the destruction of the gospel, they could not furnish Satan with a greater triumph than thus to silence its inviting voice, and to sup- press the agencies of its disciples. It is to arrest the course of the angel having the everlasting gospel, and flying through the midst of heaven, and to confine him to their own contracted hori- zon ; to demonstrate that nothing is too mon- strous to be apprehended from our nature when its selfish tendencies are the materials employed, since it can construct a system out of the gospel itself, whose most appropriate title would be " Christianity made selfishness." The scIJisJmess of the peiv, is another form of the same pervading evil ; incomparably less per- nicious, indeed, than the last mentioned, but far more extensive in its existence. This is that modification of selfish piety which lives only to he personcdly comforted ; which, in ail its reading and hearing, makes its own individual comfort, not a means, but an end; and which, in pursuit of that end, goes up and down in this world, cry- ing, *' Give, give, and is never satisfied." The divine Redeemer describes the faithful shepherd as leaving the ninety and nine sheep for a time, IX THE CHURCH. 47 to traverse the wilderness in quest of the one wanderer. But this unlovely spirit, reversing the touching picture, would have him neglect ninety and nine wanderers to attend exclusively to one folded sheep. An epicure in comfort, it is im- patient if the cup of consolation be removed from its lips for a moment, though that moment was only seized to say to a famishing multitude, " Come now, for all things are ready." Devout only in little things, it cannot bear to have its mind diverted from its own personal and partic- ular state, even though the sight to which its at- tention is called is the want of a world. It will consent to listen just once a year to the claims of the perishing heathen ; but it feels as if more than that were too much, were pressing the sub- ject unnecessarily on its attention. The ampli- tude of the divine love seeks to comprehend the universe in its large and life-giving embrace, and calls on our affections to arise and follow it in its vast diffusion ; but this selfishness stays at home, builds itself in, sees no glory in that love, but as it embraces a single point, and that point itself Consistent with itself, this same spirit, if fol- lowed from public into private, is found to be- come the srljishness of the closet. It penetrates oven to the throne of God, and there, where, if any where, a man should give himself up to what IS godlike, there, where he should go to engage an almighty agency in the behalf of his race, it banishes from his thoughts every interest but his own, rendering him a suppliant for himself 5* 48 THE FORMS OF SELFISHNESS alone. It makes him as exclusively intent on his own individual advantage, as if spiritual, like worldly good, could not be shared by others without diminishing the portion to be enjoyed by himself. Let us place ourselves, in imagination, near to the throne of God, — and what do we behold ? — a number of needy suppliants returning daily to his throne, a large proportion of whom are as unmindful of each other as if each came from a different world, and represented a distinct race of beings ; as completely absorbed in their re- spective interests as if the welfare of the species depended on their individual success. There, where each should think of all, and feel himself blended with the great whole, he virtually dis- owns kindred with all, deserts the common in- terest, and strives for himself alone. They come and lay their hand upon the springs of an agen- cy, which, if put in motion, would diffuse happi- ness through the Vvorld ; but they leave that agency unsolicited and unmoved. The blessed God calls them into his presence, partly that they might catch the radiance of his throne, and transmit it to a world immeised in the shadow of death ; but, provided they catch a ray of that light for themselves, the gloom of the world may remain unrelieved. He points out the infinity of their resources in himself, gives them access to more than they need for themselves, in order that they may go and instrumentally administer to the wants of others. He calls them to his throne as a royal priesthood, as intercessors for IN THE CIIURni. 49 tlie race; but instead of imploring the divine at- tention to the wants of the world, each of them virtually calls it off from every other object, to consecrate it upon a unit, and that unit himself. He has so laid his vast and gracious plans, that he can be enjoyed fully, only in communion, in the great assembly of heaven ; but, in contraven- tion of these plans, each one seeks to contract for himself separately with God, as if he would fain engross to himself the whole of the divine goodness. What an affecting view is this of the power of selfishness, and of the infinite pa- tience of God in bearing with it. But the form under which this Protean evil works more insidiously and extensively, perhaps, than in any which have been specified, is that of a worldly spirit; — we will venture to call it ^^e selfishness of the purse. It was the design of Christ in redeeming and saving his people by the sacrifice of himself, to convince them that his interest and theirs were identical ; — that he and they were one ; — that to enjoy any prosperity distinct from the prosperity and glory of his kingdom was impossible. And by further proposing to employ their instrumen- tality for the enlargement of his kingdom, he in- tended to give them an opportunity of evincing their love to his name, and of consecrating all the means they could abstract from the neces- sary demands of time, to the great cause of sal- vation. It was only warrantable to expect, that the exhibition of his love, and the claims of his kingdom, coming with full force upon their 50 THE FORMS OF SELFISHNESS hearts, would over\yhelm all worldly considera- tions ; that they would bring forth their wealth, and present it with the ardent devotion of an of- fering; that henceforth they would desire to prosper in the world only that they might have the more to lay at his feet; that they would in- stantly devise a plan of self-denial, each one for himself, the object of which should be to aug- ment, to the utmost, their contributions to his cause ; that nothing but the fruits of such ^elf- denial would be dignified with the name of Christian charity ; and that the absence of such self-denial and the consequent fruits of it, would be regarded as a forfeiture of the Christian name ; that the church, as " the bride, the Lamb's wife," would feel that she had, that she could have, no interest apart from his — that all her worldly possessions belonged to him, and that she would gratefully and cheerfully surrender them to him, wishing that, for his dear sake, they had been ten thousand-fold more. To ask if such is the conduct of the Christian church would be worse than triflmg. " All seek their own, not the things which are Jesus Christ's." As if their interest and his were two, separate, opposite, irreconcilable things ; or, as if they had never heard of the grace, the claims, or even the name of Christ, the great majority of Christian professors may be seen, from age to age, pursuing their own ends as ea- gerly, and wasting their substance as selfishly, as the world around them. They seek their worldly prosperity. They IN THE CHURCH. 51 know of nothinr^ equal to thai. Every thing is made to give way to that. The cause of Christ itself must wait for that, and is only lield secon- dary to it. What ! neglect any thing which tends to increase their gains ! — they would deem themselves mad to think of it; even though the salvation of an immortal soul had to wait in con- sequence. And thus, while God has to com- plain of them as slothful and unfaithful in his service, Mammon can hoast of them as among his most diligent and devoted servants. They seek their worldly ease and enjoyment. Self, self, is the idol to wiiich they are perpetu- ally sacrificing ; the monster, whose ravenous appetite they are perpetually feasting, and which eats up nearly all they have. So great is the cost of dressing and decorating this idol, of serv- ing and feasting it, of consulting its voracious appetites, and ministering to its various gratifi- cations, that but little is left for the cause of Christ. It is a " soul-wasting monster, that is fed and sustained at a dearer rate, and with more costly sacrifices and repasts, than can be parallejed by either sacred or other history ; that hath made more desolation in the souls of men than ever was made in their towns and cities where idols were served with only human sacrifices, or monstrous creatures satiated only with such food ; or where the lives and safety of the majority were to be purchased by the con- stant tribute of the blood of not a few ! that hath devoured more and preyed more cruelly upon 52 THE FORMS OF SELFISHNESS human lives, than Moloch, or the Minotaur ! " * Self, is Dives in the mansion, clothed in purple, and faring sumptuously every day ; — the cause of Christ, is Lazarus, lying at his gate, and fed only with the crumbs which fall from his table. These are some of the leading forms of that demon of selfishness, whose name is Legion, and which, in every age, has been the great an- tagonist of the gospel, threatening, at times, even to drive the principle of benevolence from the world. What but this is it which keeps the piety of the individual professor joyless to him- self? — which renders many a congregation of professing Christians a company of inactive use- less men, assembling merely for their own reli- gious ends, and separating only to pursue their own worldlly ends, as regardless of the welfare of others, as if none but themselves inhabited the earth 1 — which turns the several denominations of which the Christian church is composed, into so many sources of mutual disquietude and weak- ness ? — and which makes that church the scorn of an infidel world, instead of its boast and glory ? It has defrauded millions of the offer of eternal life : — and what but selfishness is, at this moment, defrauding God of his glory, long since due ? and the church of its promised prosperity ? and the world of the redemptiotj provided for it? Well has self been denominated the great Anti- christ; for, thoui^rh it may not be the antichrist of prophecy which is to appear in the latter day, * Howe. IN THE CHURCH. 53 it is the antichrist of every day and every age ; the great usurper of the rights of Christ, the great antagonist and obstacle to his universal reign. " For all seek their own, not the things which are Jesus Christ's." That we do not exaggerate its pernicious pow- er, let it only be supposed that selfishness, in all the forms we have specified, has been banished from the church, — and what would ensue ? Each denomination of Christians, without sacrificing its distinctive character, would embrace and seek to ally itself as closely with all the rest as a community of interest, hope and affection could bind it. Each creed would have the necessity and divinity of brotherly love among its primary articles — teaching the Christian that a heart glowing with affection to "the brethren," exhales the incense most acceptable to God ; that such love is God in man. Devotion no longer termi- nating in itself, would go to God, and plead for the world. Piety, no longer seeking after com- fort as an end, would find it without seeking ; find it in the paths of Christian activity and use- fulness. Like the piety of apostolic times, it would be exempted from all the morbid com- plaints of a slothful religion, and would find its health and enjoyment in living to Christ. The whole church would be kindled into a sacrificial flame for his glory, into which every Christian would cast the savings of his self-denial as appro- priate fuel for feeding a flame so sacred. A love which would yearn over the whole human race ; zeal which would be constantly devising fresh 54 FORMS OF SELFISHNESS IN THE CHURCH. methods of usefulness, denying itself, and lay- ing itself out for God ; and a perseverance which would never rest till the whole family of man should be seated at the banquet of salvation ; — these would be the prevailing features of the entire Christian community. From such a scene the eternal Spirit could not be absent ; its very existence would demonstrate his presence. The tabernacle of God would be with men upon the earth. God would bless us, and all the ends of the earth would fear him. Now, of all this, selfishness is defrauding us. It is keeping the universe in suspense. Like a spring-season held back by the chilling breath of winter, all things are waiting for the desired change ; when the Christian church, bursting forth as in the vernal beauty of its youth, shall become another paradise, full of melody, in- cense, and joy. PART THE SECOND. COVETOUSNESS. — THE PRINCIPAL FORM OF SELFISH- NESS, — IN ITS NATURE, FORM, PREVALENCE, ES- PECIALLY IN BRITAIN, DISGUISES, TESTS, EVILS, DOOM, AND PLEAS. SECTION I THE NATURE OF COVETODSNESS. If selfishness be the prevailino^ form of sin, covetousness may be regarded as the prevailing form of selfishness. This is strikingly intimated by the apostle Paul, when, describing the "peril- ous times" of the final apostacy, he represents selfishness as the prolific root of all the evils which will then prevail, and covetousness as its first fruit. "For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous." In passing, therefore, from the preceding out- line of selfishness in general, to a consideration of this form of it in particular, we feel that we need not labor to magnify its importance. A very little reflection will suflnce to show that, while the other forms of selfishness are partial in their existence, this is universal ; that it lies in our daily path, and surrounds us like the at- mosphere ; that it exceeds all others in the plausibility of its pretences, and the insidiousness of its operations ; that it is, commonly, the last 58 THE NATURE OF COVETOUSNESS. forms of selfishness which leaves the heart ; and that Christians, who have comparatively escaped from all the others may still be unconsciously enslaved by this. If there be ground to fear that covetousness "will, in all probability, prove the eternal overthrow of more characters among pro- fessing people than any other sin, because it is almost the only crime which can be indulged, and a profession of religion at the same time supported ; " and if it be true also, that it operates more than any other sin to hold the church in apparent league with the world, and to defeat its design, and to rob it of its honors as the instru- ment of the world's conversion, surely nothing more can be necessary to reveal the ajipalling magnitude of the evil, and to justify every at- tempt that may be made, to sound an alarm against it. Covetousness denotes the state of a mind from which the Supreme Good has been lost, laboring to replace him by some subordinate form of en- joyment. The determinate direction which this craving takes after money, is purely accidental, and arises from the general consent of society, that money shall be the representative of all property, and, as such, the key to all the ave- nues of worldly enjoyment. But as the exist- ence of this conventional arrangement renders the possession of some amount of property indis- pensable, the application of the term covetousness has come to be confined almost exclusively to an inordinate and selfish regard for money. Our liablity to this sin arises, we say, from the THE NATURE OF COVETOUSNESS. 59 perception that " money answereth all things." Riches in themselves, indeed, are no evil. Nor is the bare possession of tliem wrong. Nor is the desire to possess them sinful, provided that desire exist under certain restrictions. For in almost every stage of civilization money is requi- site to procure the conveniences, and even the necessaries of life ; to desire it therefore as the means of life, is as innocent as to live. In its higher application it may be made the instru- ment of great relative usefulness; to seek it, then, as the means of doing good, is not a vice, but a virtue. But, perceiving that money is so important an agent in society ; — that it not only fences off the wants and woes of poverty, but that, like a centre of attraction, it can draw to itself every object of worldly desire from the farthest circumference; — the temptation arises of desiring it inordinately; of even desiring it for its own sake ; of supposing that the instru- ment of procuring so much jTood must itself pos- sess intrinsic excellence. From observing that gold could procure for us, whatever it touches, we are tempted to wish, like the fabled king, that whatever we touch might be turned into gold. But the passion for money exists in various degrees, and exhibits itself in very different as- pects. No classification of its multiplied forms, indeed, can, from the nature of things, be rigor- ously exact. All its branches and modifications run into each other, and are separated by grada- tions rather than by lines of demarcation. The 6* 60 THE NATURE OF COVETOUSNESS. most obvious and general distinction, perhaps, is that which divides it into the desire of getting^ as contradistinguished from the desire of ^'cepm^ that which is already possessed. But each of these divisions is capable of subdivision. World- liness, rapacity, and an ever-craving, all-con- suming prodigality, may belong to the one ; and parsimony, niggardliness, and avarice to the other. The word covetousness, however^ is pop- ularly employed as synonymous with each of these terms, and as comprehensive of them all. SECTION II. FORMS OF COVETOUSNESS. By worldlincs^^ we mean cupidity in its earli- est, most plausible, and most prevailing form : not yet sutTiciently developed to be conspicuous to the eye of man, yet sufficiently characteristic and active to incur the prohibition of God. It is that quiet and ordinary operation of the prin- ciple which abounds most with excuses ; which is seldom questioned even by the majority of pro- fessing Christians ; which the morality of the world allows and even commends ; which may live, unrebuked, through a whole life, under the decent garb of frugality, and honest industry ; and which thus silently works the dstruction of multitudes without alarming them. Rapacity is covetousness grasping ; " making haste to be rich." This is the true " wolf in the breast," ever feeding, and yet ever craving ; so ravenous that nothing is like it except death and the grave. It is a passion which compels every other feeling to its aid ; the day seems too short 62 FORMS OP COVETOUSNESS. for it ; success is looked on as a reward and a spur; failure as a punishment for some relaxa- tion of the passion ; the weahh of others seems to reproach it ; the poverty of others to warn it. Determined to gratify itself, it overlooks the morality of the means, despises alike the tardi- ness of industry, and the scruples of integrity, and thinks only of the readiest way to success. Impatient of delay, it scorns to wait for intima- tions of the divine will or to watch the move- ments of Povidence; and the only restraints which it acknowledges — though many of these it would gladly overleap — are such as our fears of each other have erected into laws, for the ex- press purpose of confining it within bounds. Parsimony is covetousness 'parting with its life-blood. It is the frugality of selfishness ; the art of parting with as little as possible. Of this disposition it can never be said that it gives, but only that it capitulates; its freest bestowments have the air of a surrender made with an ill grace. Avarice is covetousness hoarding. It is the love of money in the abstract, or, for its own sake. Covetousness, in this monstrous form, indeed, is but of rare occurrence. For as money is a compendium of all kinds of worldly good, or so much condensed world, it is mostly desired for the sake of the gratifications which it can pur- chase ; it is sought and valued as a kind of con- centrated essence, which can be diluted at pleas- ure, and adapted to the taste of every one who possesses it. But avarice is content with FORMS OF COVETOUSNESS. G3 the bare possession of tlie essence ; stopping short at the means, it is satisfied without tlie end. By a strange infatuation it looks upon gold as its own end ; and, as the ornaments which the Israelites transferred into the hands of Aaron became a god, so gold, in the hands of avarice, becomes an ultimate good : to speak of its utili- ty, or its application to practical purposes, would be almost felt as a profanation. Other vices have a particular view to enjoyment, (falsely so called,) hut the very term miser is a confession of the misery which attends avarice; for, in or- der to save his gold, the miser robs himself; " Throws up his interest in both worlds ; First starved in this, then damned in that to come." He cannot be said to possess wealth ; wealth possesses him ; or else he possesses it like a fever which burns and consumes him as if molten gold were circulating in his veins. Many vices wear out and are abandoned as age and experi- ence increase, but avarice strikes deeper root as age advances ; and, like the solitary tree of the desert, flourishes amidst sterility where nothing else could survive. Other passions are parox- ysms, and intermit; but avarice is a distemper which knows no intervals. Other ])assicns have their times of relaxation ; but avarice is a tyrant wliich never suffers its slaves to rest. It is the fabled dragon with its golden fleece, and with lidless and unslumbering eyes it keeps Avatch and ward night and day. 64 FORMS OF COVETOUSNESS. Prodigality^ though directly opposed to ava- rice or hoarding, is quite compatible with cupid- ity ; and is, indeed, so frequently found in combination with it, that it may be regarded as one of its complex forms. The character which Sallust gives of Catiline, that " he was covetous of other men's wealth, while he squandered his own," is one of very common occurrence. And we notice it here to show, that although men may occasionally be heard pleading their extravagance to clear themselves from the charge of cupidity, it yet originates in the same cause, produces pre- cisely the same effects, employs the same sinful means of gratification, and incurs the same doom. They must be covetous, that they may be prodi- gal : one hand must collect, that the other may have wherewith to scatter: covetousness, as the steward to prodigality, must furnish supplies, and is often goaded into rapacity, that it may raise them. Thus prodigality strengthens covetous- ness by keeping it in constant activity, and cov- etousness strengthens prodigality by slavishly feeding its voracious appetite. Taking possession of the heart, " they divide the man between them," each in turn becoming cause and effect. But prodigal self-indulgence not only produces cupid- ity, it stands to every benevolent object in the same relation as avarice — it has nothing to give. A system of extravagant expenditure rerjders be- nevolence impossible, and keeps a man con- stantly poor towards God. SECTION III. PREVALENCE OF COVETOUSNESS, To the charge of covetousness, under one or other of tliese various forms, how large a propor- tion of mankind, and even of professing Chris- tians, must plead guilty ! It is true, indeed, that all these modifications of covetousness, can- not co-exist in the same mind, for some of them are destructive of each other; and such is the anx- iety of men to escape from the hateful charge entirely, that, finding they are exempt from some of its forms, they flatter themselves that they are guiltless of all. But this delusion, in most cases, indicates the mournful probahility, that the evil, besides having taken up its abode within them, has assunied there a form and a name so plausi- ble, as not merely to escape detection, but even to secure to itself the credit of a virtue, and the welcome of a friend. In the eyes of the world, a man may acquire, and through along life maintain, a character for liberality and spirit, while his heart all the time 66 PREVALENCE OF COVETOUSNESS. goeth after his covetousness. His hand, like a channel, may be ever open ; and, because his in- come is perpetually flowing through it, the unre- flecting world, taken with appearances, hold him up as a pattern of generosity ; but the entire current is absorbed by his own selfishness. That others are indirectly benefited by his profusion, does not enter into his calculations; he thinks only of his own gratification. It is true his mode of hving may employ others ; but he is the idol of the temple — they are only priests in his ser- vice ; and the prodigalhy they are empowered to indulge in, is only intended to decorate and do honor to his altar. To maintain an extensive establishment, to carry it high before the world, to settle his children respectably in life, to maintain a system of costly self-indulgence, — these are the objects which swallow up all his gains, and keep him in a constant fever of ill- concealed anxiety ; filling his heart with envy and covetousness at the sight of others' prosperi- ty ; rendering him loath to part with a fraction of his property to benevolent purposes; making him feel as if every farthing of his money so em- ployed, were a diversion of that farthing from the great ends of life ; and causing him even to begrudge the hallowed hours of the Sabbath, as so much time lost (if, indeed, he allows it to be lost) to the cause of gain. New channels of be- nevolence may open around him in all direc- tions ; but as far as he is concerned, those chan- nels must remain dry ; for, like the sands of the desert, he absorbs all the bounty which Heaven PREVALENCE OF COVETOUSNESS. 67 rains on him, and still craves for more. What but tliis is commonly meant by the expression concerning such a man, that "he is living up to his income 1 " The undisguised interpretation is, that he is engrossing to himself all that be- nevolence which should be diti'used throughout the world; that he is appropriating all that por- tion of the divine bounty with which he has been intrusted, and which he ought to share with the rest of mankind ; and that he is thus disabling liimself for all the calls and claims of Christian charity. Alas! that so large a proportion of professing Christians should be, at this moment, sy sternal ically incapicitating themselves for any tiling more than scanty driblets of charity, by their unnecessary expenditure, their extravagant self-indulgence. Where avarice, or hoarding, has slain its thousands, a lavish profusion has slain its tens of thousands ; and where the former robs the cause of God of a mite, the latter robs it of a inillion. A man may defy a charge of avarice, in the aggravated sense of that term, to be substantia- ted against him. Indeed, a miser in the sense in which the character was ordinarily portrayed, is a most unusual prodigy, a monster rarely found but in description. " His life is one long sigh for wealth : he would coin his life-blood into gold : he would sell his soul for gain." Now, the injurious effect of such exaggerated repre- sentations is, men, conscious that their parsimo- ny does not resemble such a character, ac([uit themselves of the charge of covetousness alto- 7 68 PREVALENCE OF COVETOUSNESS. gether. Unable to recognise in this disguised and distorted picture of the vice their own like- ness, they flatter themselves into a behef of their entire innocence, as if the advice admitted of no degrees, and none were guilty if not as guilty as possible. But, though a man may not merit to be de- nominated avaricious, he may yet be parsimoni- ous. He may not be a Dead Sea, ever receiving, and never imparting; but yet he may be as un- like the Nile, when, overflowing its banks, it leaves a rich deposit on the neighboring lands. His domestic economy is a system of penurious- ness, hateful to servants, visiters, and friends; from which every thing generous has fled, and in which even every thing necessary comes with the air of being begrudored, of existing only by sufferance. In his dealing with others, he seems to act under the impression that mankind have conspired to defraud him, and the consequence is, that his conduct often amounts to a construc- tive fraud on mankind. He is delighted at the idea of saving, and exults at the acquisition of a little pelf with a joy strikingly disproportionate to its worth. He looks on every thing given to charity, as so much lost, thrown away, and for which there will never be any return. If a be- nevolent appeal surprise him into an act of unu- sual liberality, he takes ample revenge by keen self-reproaches, and a determination to steel himself against all such assaults in future. Or else, in his relenting moments, and happier moods, he plumes himself, and looks as compla- PREVALENCE OF COVETOUSNESS. 69 cently on himself for having bestowed a benevo- 1(MU mile, as if he liad performed an act of piety, for which nothing less than heaven would be an adequate reward. His soul not only never ex- pands to the warmth of benevolence, but con- tracts at the bare proposal, the most distant pros- pect, of sacrifice. His presence in any society met for a charitable purpose would be fell like the vicinity of an iceberg, freezin^r the atmos- phere, and repressing the warm and flowing cur- rent of benevolence. The eloquent think it a triumph to have pleaded tiie cause of mercy be- fore him unabashed ; and the benevolent are satisfied if they can oidy bring away their sacred fire undamped from his presence. He scowls at every benev(j|ent project as romantic, as suited to the meridian of Utopia, to a very different state of things from what is known in this world. He hears of the time when the church will make, and will be necessitated to make, far greater sacrifices than at present, with con- scious uneasiness, or resolved incredulity. His life is an economy of petty avarice, constructed on the principle of partmg with as little as pos- sible, and getting as much, — a constant warfare against benevolence. But a person may be free from the charge of parsimony, and yet open to the accusation of worldliness. }Iis covetousness may not be so determined as to distinguish him from the mul- titude, but yet sufficiently marked to show that his treasure is not in heaven. He was born with the world in his heart, and nothing has yet 70 PREVALENCE OF COVETOUSNESS. expelled it. He may regularly receive the seed of the gospel, but the soil is pre-occupied ; " the cares of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, choke the word, and render it un- fruitful." He will listen to an ordinary exposi- tion of the vanity of wealth as a matter of course, and will appear to give it his entire assent ; and yet, immediately after, he resumes his pursuit of that i;«m7?/ with an avidity which seems in- creased by the temporary interruption. But let the exposition be more than usually vivid, let it aim at awakening his conviction of the dangers attending wealth, let it set forth the general pref- erableness of competence to affluence, and it will be found to be disturbing the settled order of his sentiments. A representation of the snares of wealth, is regarded by him as the empty decla- mation of a man who has been made splenetic by disappointments, or who has been soured by losses ; who has never known the sweets of wealth, or, having known, has lost them, and would gladly recover them again if he could. He never listens to such representations as — that unsanctified riches are only the means of purchasing disappointment; that the possessor suffers rather than enjoys them; that his wants multiply faster than his means — without an in- ward smile of scepticism, a conscious feeling of incredulity ; a feeling which, if put into words, would express itself thus: " O, if I might be but made rich, I would make myself happy. Tell me not of dangers : cheerfully would I risk them all, only bless me with wealth." And his life is PREVALENCE OF COVETOUSxNESS. 71 arranged, and spent, in strict accordance with this cotires>ion. In liis vocabulary, wealth means happiness — the chief good. And in his reading of the Holy Scripture, the declaration of our Lord is reversed, as if lie l:ad said — A man's life consisteth in the abundance of the things which he possesseth. And this representation, be it observed, applies to the man whose ideas of ueahh are limited to a few liundreds, as much as to him whose wishes aspire to hundreds of thousands. The poor man is apt to imagine that covetousness is a subject in which he has no interest — that it is a sin pe- culiar to the rich. It is true, indeed, that he may not plan for riches, because he may not be able to plan much for any thing ; calculation is out of its s|)here — it requires too much thought for him. And it is true, also, that the prosper- ous are more liable to indulge cupidity than the poor ; for if it cannot be said with confidence that poverty starves the propensity, it may certainly be affirmed that prosperity feeds it; often awak- ening it at first from its dormant state, and turn- ing every subsequent instance of gain into a meal to gratify its voracious appetite. But there is no sphere so humble and contract- ed as to secure a man against its intrusion. Like a certain class of plants, it seems only to ask for room, though it should be on a rock, and for the common air, in order to thrive. The man who Hatters himself that he has " retired from the world," may still be carrying this abridge- ment of the world's influence about with him in 72 PREVALENCE OP COVETOUSNESS. his heart ; and by artfully soliciting the poor man under the disguise of industry, of frugality, or of providing for his family, it may have yoked him as a captive to its car, though he may ap- pear to be only keeping poverty at bay. He need not plunge into the ocean in order to drown himself — a very shallow stream will suffice, if he chooses to lie prostrate in it ; and the desire of the smallest gain, if his heart be immersed in the pursuit, will as certainly ** drown him in per- dition," as if the object of his cupidity were the wealth of a Croesus. He takes his character, and incurs his danger, not from the magnitude of his object, but from the unceasing and undi- vided manner in which he pursues it. Though his worldliness may be quiet and equable in its operation, yet, like an ever-flowing stream, it gradually wears his whole soul into one channel, which drains off his thoughts and affections from higher ground, and carries them all in a steady current in that single direction ; while his occa- sional impressions of a religious nature only ripple its surface for a moment, and vanish, without in the least retarding its onward course. But to specify all the forms of covetousness, and to trace it in all its modifications, is impos- sible. Capable of combining with all motives, and penetrating all actions in its symptoms or its practice it is every where to be found. It acknowledges no conqueror but the grace of God, and owns no limit but that of the world. Our great epic poet, with equal sublimity and propriety, gives to it an existence even beyond PREVALENCE OF COVETOUSNESS. /O this world. Recording the history of Mammon — the Scripture personification of cupidity — he describes him as " the least erected spirit that fell From heav^en : for even in heaven his looks and thoughts Were always downward bent; admiring more The riches of heaven's pavement, trodden gold, Than aught divine or holy else, enjoyed hi vision beatific." The moral of which is, that covetousness is one of the eldest-born of sin, and a prime leader in the satanic empire of evil ; that no nature is too lofty, no i)lace too sacred, for its presence ; that being a universal passion, no enterprise is too daring for it to attempt, no sphere too extended for its range. One of tlie great objects of the personal min- istry of our Lord himself, appears to have been to make us aware of the universality of this pas- sion, and to save us from it. Sin having expelled the love of God from the heart, he saw that the love of the world had rushed in to fill up the va- cuum ; that the desire of riches, as an abstract of all otherworldly desires has become a uni- versal passion, in which all other appetites and passions concur, since it is the readiest means to gratify them all. To the eye of an ordinary observer, the generation of that day appeared to be only laudably employed in their respective avocations ; but, penetrating the thin disguises of custom, he beheld the world converted into a mart in which every thing was exposed for sale. 74 PREVALENCE OF COVETOUSNESS. To a common observer, the confused pursuits and complicated passions of mankind might have presented an aspect of ever-shifting forms, as in- capable of classification as the waves of the sea ; but to his comprehensive view there appeared but two great classes, in which all minor distinctions were merged — the servants of God, and the ser- vants of Mammon. To his unerring and om,- uiscient glance, the whole world appeared to be engrossed in a laborious experiment to effect a compromise between these two claimants : but against such an accommodation he enters his di- vine protest; affirming, with the solemnity and confidence of one who knew that though the ex- periment had been made, and repeated in every form and in every age, it had failed as often as it had been made, and will prove eternally im- practicabie. *' Ye cannot serve God and mam- mon." To an ordinary observer, the charge of covetousness could only be alleged against a few individuals; but he tracked it through the most unsuspected windings, laid open some of its most concealed operations, and showed that, like the elemental fire, it is not only present where it is grossly visible, but that it is all-pervading, and co-extensive with human depravity. Entering the mart of the busy world, where nothing is heard but the monotonous hum of the traders in vanity, he lifts up his voice like the trump of God, and seeks to break the spell which infatuates them, while he exclaims, " What shall it profit a man, if he gain the whole world, and Jose his own soul ? or, what shall a man give in PREVALENCE OF COVETOUSNESS. /5 exchange for his soul ? " Proceeding to the mansion of Dives, he shows selfishness there, clothed in purple and fine linen, and faring sumptuously every day, — a spectacle at which the multitude stands in earnest and admiring gaze, as if it drew in happiness at the sight, — but Lazarus unheeded perishes at the gate. Approaching the house of prosperity, he bids us listen to the soliloquy of its wordly inhabitant, " I will pull down my barns, and will build greater " — a resolution which the world ap- plauds — "And I will say to my soul, Soul, thou hast much goods laid up for many years ; take thine ease, eat, drink, and be merry " — a pros- pect of happiness which the world envies: but God is not in all his thoughts ; besides his wealth he knows no god. Passing into the circle of devotion, he pointed out the principle of covet- ousness there, mingling in the worship of God, choking the word, and rendering it unfruitful. Penetrating the heart, he unveiled its hateful ])resence there, as the leaven of hypocrisy, and the seed of theft. And can we wonder at the energy and fre- quency with which he denounced it, when we remember how frecjuently it came into direct per- sonal contact with liimself, defeating his tender- est solicitudes, and robbing him of souls he yearned to save ? It was covetousness which rendered unfruitful so largo a proportion of that heavenly seed which he had come to sow. It was this which begrudged him the anointing for his burial. It was this which robbed his king- 76 PREVALENCE OF COVETOUSNESS. dom of a subject, just at the moment when " the young man " appeared to be about to fall into his train, and wisich drew from him the affect- ing exclamation, " How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of heaven ! " This it was which left the gospel feast so thinly attended, and which sent excuses instead of guests. His audience commonly consisted of "the Pharisees who were covetous, and derided him." Wherever he looked, he beheld the prin- ciple in active, manifold, ruinous operation ; "devouring widows' houses," drinking orphans' tears, luxuriating in the spoils of defenceless childhood and innocence. Did he turn from this sickening spectacle, and seek relief in the tem- ple ? there he beheld nothing but a den of thieves. Mammon was there enshrined ; the solemn pass- over itself turned into gain ; the priests traffick- ing in the blood of human souls. Like their forefathers, " from the least of them even to the greatest of them, every one was given to covet- ousness." But the last triumph of covetousness remained yet to be achieved. To have sold the temple for money would have been an act of daring impie- ty ; to make it the place of merchandise was, perhaps, still worse — it was adding sacrilege to impiety. Only one deed more remained to be perpetrated, and covetousness might then rest satisfied. There was one greater than the tem- ple. God so loved the world, that he had sent his only begotten Son to redeem it — might not he be sold 1 Covetousness, in the person of Judas, PREVALENCE OF COVETOUSNESS. "77 looked on liim, eyed him askance, and went to the traffickers in blood, and, for the charm of thirty pieces of silver, betrayed him, — a type of the manner in which the cause of mercy would be betrayed in every succeeding age. Yes, in the conduct of Judas, the incarnation of cupidity, towards Jesus Christ, the incarna- tion of benevolence, we may behold an intima- tion of the quarter from which, in all succeed- ing times, the greatest danger would arise to the cause of Christ. The scene of the Savior's betrayal for money was an affecting rehearsal, a prophetic warning, of the treatment which his gospel might expect to the end of the world. Atul have events falsified the prediction ? Let the history of the corruptions of Christianity testify. The spirit of gain deserted the Jewish temple, only to take up its abode in the Chris- tian church. Having sold the Savior to the cross, it proceeded, in a sense, to sell the cross itself. We allude not to the venality of selling " the wood of the true cross," — that was only a diminutive of that accursed lust of gain which " thouoht the gift of God might be purchased with money," and which literally placed the great blessinirsof the cross at sale. Gradually, every thing became a source of gain. Not a single innovation, or rite, was introduced, which had not a relation to gain. Nations were laid under tribute. Every shrine had its gifts; eve- ry confession its cost ; every prayer its charge ; every benediction its price. Dispensation fiom duty and indulgence in sin, were both attain- 78 PREVALENCE OF COVETOUSNESS. able at the sum set down, Liberation from hell, and admission into heaven, were both subject to money. And, not content with following its victims into the invisible state, Covetousness even there created a third world, for the pur- pose of assessing its tortured inhabitants. Thus the religion whose blessings were intended to be without money, and without price, became the tax and burden of the world, a proverb for ex- tortion and rapine, till the wealth which the church had drained from a thousand states, ** turned to poison in its bosom," and mankind arose to cast it from them as a bloated corruption and a curse. The truth is, covetousness is native to our fallen nature; and, unless religion vanquish it, in its indiscriminate ravages, it will vanquish religion. Other forms of selfishness are partial to their operation, being either confined to a party, or, at most, to an order of character; but covetousness is the sin of humanity ; it is the name of a disease which knows no distinction of class or party — the epidemic malady of our race. Gold is the only power which receives uni- versal homage. It is worshipped in all lands without a single temple, and by all classes without a single hypocrite ; and often has it been able to boast of having armies for its priesthood, and hecatombs of human victims for its sacrifices. Where war has slain its thousands, gain has slaughtered its millions ; for, while the former operates only with the PREVALENCE OF COVETOUSNESS. 79 local and fitful terrors of an earthquake, the destructive influence of the latter is universal and unceasing. Indeed, war itself — what has it often been but the art of gain practised on the largest scale? the covetousness of a nation resolved on gain, impatient of delay, and lead- ing on its subjects to deeds of rapine and blood? Its history is the history of slavery and op- pression, in all ages. For centuries, Africa — one quarter of the globe — has been set apart to supply the monster with victims — thousands at a meal. And at this moment, what a popu- lous and gigantic empire can it boast ! the mine with its unnatural drudgery; the manu- factory, with its forms of squalid misery; the plantation, with its imbruted gangs ; and the market and the exchange, with their furrowed and care-worn countenances, — these are only specimens of its more menial offices and sub- jects. Titles and honors are among its re- wards, and thrones at its disj^osal. Among its counsellors are kings, and many of the great and n)ighty of the earth enrolled among its subjects. Where are the waters not ploughed by its navies ? What imperial element is not yoked to its car ? Philosophy itself has be- come a mercenary in its pay ; and science, a votary at its shrine, brings all its noblest dis- coveries, as offerings to its feet. What part of the globe's surface is not rapidly yielding up its last stores of hidden treasure to the spirit of gain? or retains more than a few miles 8 80 PREVALExNCE OF COVETOUSNESS. of unexplored and unvanquished territory 1 Scorning the childish dream of the philoso- pher's stone, it aspires to turn the globe itself into gold. SECTION IV THE PRESENT PREDOMINANCE OF COVETOUSNESS IN BRITAIN. This is a subject in which the Christians of Britain have more than an ordinary interest. For, though no part of the world is exempt from the inHuence of covetousnesis, a commercial na- tion, like Britain, is more liable to its debasement than any other. Were it not indii^^enous to the human heart, here it would surely have been born ; for here are assembled all the fermenting elements, favorable to its spontaneous genera- tion : or, were it to be driven from every other land, liere it would find sanctuary in a thousand places open to receive it. Not only does it exist among us, it is honored, worshipped, deified. Alas! it has — without a figure — its priests; its aj)propriate temples — earthly "hells;" its cer- emonial ; its ever-burning fires, fed with precious things which ought to be offered as incense to God ; and, for its sacrifices, immortal souls. Every nation lias its idol : in some countries that idol is pleasure ; in others, glory ; in others, 82 THE PRESENT PREDOMINANCE OF liberty; but the name of our idol is mammon. The shrines of the others, indeed, are not neg- lected, but it must be conceded that money is the mightiest of all our idol-gods. And not only does this fact distinguish us from most other nations, it distinguishes our present from our former selves — it is the brand- mark of the present age. For, if it be true, that each successive age has its representative — that it beholds itself reflected in some leading school, and impresses its image on the philosophy of the day, where shall we look for the image of the existing age but in our systems of political econ- omy 7 "Men who w^ould formerly have devoted their lives to a metaphysical and moral research, are now given up to a more material study " — to the theory of rents, and the philosophy of the mart. Morality itself is allowed to employ no standard but that of utility — to enforce her re- quirements by no plea but expediency, a consid- eration of profit and loss. And even the science of metaphysics is wavering, if it has not actual- ly pronounced, in favor of a materialism which would subject the great mysteries of humanity to mathematical admeasurement, and chemical analysis. Mammon is marching through the land in triumph ; and it is to be feared that a large majority of all classes have devoted and degraded themselves to the office of his train- bearers. Statements like these may startle the reader who now reflects on the subject for the first time. But let him be assured " as the first impression COVETOUSNESS IN BRITAIN. 83 which the foreigner receives on entering England is that of the evidence of weahh, so the first thing which strikes an inquirer into our social system is the absorbing respect in which wealth is held. The root of all our laws is to be found in the sentiment of property ; " and this senti- ment, right in itself, has, by excess, infected with an all-pervading taint, our politics, our sys- tems of education, the distribution of honors, the popular notions — nay, it has penetrated our lan- guage, and even intruded into the sacred enclo- sures of religion. This is a truth, obvious, not merely to the foreigner to whom it is a compara- tive novelty, the taint is acknowledged and de- plored even by those who have become acclima- ted and inured to it. Not merely does the divine protest against it ; * the man of the world joins him ; for it is felt to be a common cause. The legislator complains that governments are getting to be little better than political establishments to furnish facilities for the accumulation of wealth. The philanthropist complains that generous mo- tives are lost sight of in the prevailing desire of gain; so that he who evinces a disposition to disinterested benevolence is either distrusted as a hypocrite, or derided as a fool. The moralist * IRs complaint must be thought professional. In this section, therefore the writer has had recourse to authori- ties which some may co\\s\t\ev oi greater weight. His quo- tations are derived principally from Coleridge's Lay Ser- mons, Bulwer's England and the English, and from the two leading Reviews. 8* 84 THE PRESENT PREDOMINANCE OF complains that '* commerce has kindled in the nation a universal emulation for wealth, and that money receives all the honors which are the proper right of knowledge and virtue." The candidate for worldly advancement and honor protests against the arrangement which makes promotion a matter of purchase, thus disparaging and discouraging all worth save that of wealth. The poet laments that " the world is too much with us ; " that *' all things are sold ; " that every thing is made a marketable commodity, and " labelled with its price." The student of men- tal and moral philosophy laments that his favor- ite " sciences are falling into decay, while the physical are engrossing, every day, more respect and attention ; " that the " worship of the beau- tiful and good has given place to a calculation of the profitable ; " that " every work which can be made use of to immediate profit, every work which falls in with the desire of acquiring wealth suddenly, is sure of an appropriate circulation ; " that we have been led to " estimate the w^orth of all pursuits and attainments by their market- able value." To the same unhallowed spirit of gain is to be traced that fierce " competition " of which the laborer, the artisan, the dealer, the manu- facturer, and even the members of all the liberal professions, alike complain. That competition, under certain limits, is necessary to the activity and healthy condition of ihe social economy, is not to be denied. But when it rises to a strug- gle in which neither time nor strength is left COVETOUSNESS IN BRITAIN. H5 for higher pursuits ; in which every new com- petitor is looked on in the light of an enemy ; in which every personal exertion, and practica- ble retrenchment, in the mode of conducting business, do but barely leave a subsistence, — there must be something essentially wrong in our ruling spirit, or social constitution. True, the fact that the evil exists may palliate the con- duct of the Christian, who, in mere self-defence, and without his own seeking, finds himself com- pelled by circumstances to engage in the rivalry and turmoil. Such a man is an object, not of blame, but of pity. But how small the number of those who are not actually augmenting the evil, either by a sumptuous style of living, which absorbs the entire profits of business as fast as they accrue, and which even anticipates them ; or else by a morbid and exorbitant craving after something new, by which the ingenuity and ap- plication of men of business are kept constantly taxed, and competition is almost converted into hostility ! Our present concern, however, is not with the cause, but with the fact. And on all hands it is admitted, that the way in which busi- ness is now conducted, involves all the risk, uncertainly, and unnatural excitement of a game of chance. Nor is the strife of fashion less apparent than the struggle of business. Each class of the community, in succession, is pressing on that which is immediately before it. Many of those engaged in the rivalry are supporting themselves by temporary expedients ; concealing their real Ob THE PRESENT PREDOMINANCE OF poverty by occasional extravagance and display. Take the following description of the fact, from an eminent Christian moralist, whose position in society enabled him to judge correctly, and on a a large scale: — " Others, .... a numerous class in our days, attach themselves to the pomps and vanities of life. Magnificent houses, grand equipages, numerous retinues, splendid enter- tainrrients, high and fashionable connexions, ap- pear to constitute, in their estimation, the su- preme happiness of life. Persons to whose rank and station these indulgencies most properly be- long, often are the most indifferent to them. Undue solicitude about them is more visible in persons of inferior conditions and smaller for- tunes ; in whom it is detected by the studious contrivances of a misapplied ingenuity, to recon- cile parade with economy, and to glitter at a cheap rate. There is an evident effort and strug- gle to excel in the particulars here in question ; a manifest wish to rival superiors ; to outstrip equals, and to dazzle inferiors." * The truth of this picture, it is to be feared, has been daily increasing, ever since it was drawn. A spirit of extravagance and display naturally seeks for resources in daring pecuniary specula- tions. Industry is too slow and plodding for it. Accordingly, this is the age of reckless adven- ture. The spirit of the lottery is still upon us. " Sink or swim," is the motto of numbers who are ready to stake their fortune on a speculation; * Wilberforce on Practical Chrisiianily. COVETOUSNESS IN BRITAIN. 87 and evil indeed must be that project, and peril- ous in the extreme must be that scheme, which tiiey would hesitate to adopt, if it held out the remotest prospect of gain. Tlie writer is quite aware, and free to admit, that we are, from circumstances — and long may be — an active, iudustrious, trading people. Much of our distinctive greatness as a nation is owing to this fact. Nor is he insensible to the numerous claims of the present age to be called the age of benevolence. Both these facts, however, he regards as quite compatible with his present allegations. For the truth appears to be, that, much as the benevolence of the age has increased the spirit of trade has increased still more ; that it has far outstript the spirit of benevolence ; so that, while the spirit of benev- olence has increased ahsolutcli/, yet relatively it may be said to have declined, toliave lost ground to the spirit of trade, and to be tainted and op- pressed by its influence. How large a propor- tion of what is cast into the Christian treasury must l)e regarded merely as a kind of quit-rent paid to the cause of benevolence by the spirit of trade, that it might be left free to devote itself to the absorbing claims of the world. How small a proportion of it is subtracted from the vanities and indulgencics of life ; how very little of it results from a settled plan of benevolence, or from that self-denial, without which, on Ciiristian principles, there is no benevolence. Never, perhaps, was self-denial a rarer virtue than in the present age. 0» THE PRESENT PREDOMINANCE OP Again : what is the testimony of those in our most popular schools who educate our youth? — that "there is a prevailing indifference to that class of sciences, the knowledge of which is not profitable to the possessor in a pecuniary point of view," — that the only learning in request is that which teaches the art of making money. The man of ancestral rank complains, that even respect for birth is yielding to the mer- cenary claim of riches. Such is the all-trans- forming power of cupidity, that business the most oppressive is pursued with all the zest of an amusement, while amusement, intended to be a discharge from business,is laboriously cultivated by thousands as a soil for profitable speculation and golden fruit. Perhaps the greatest triumph which the lust of lucre has achieved, next to its presence in the temple of God, is the effectual manner in which it has converted the principal amusements of the nation into so vast and com- plicated a system of gambling, that, to master it, demands all the studious application of a profound science. Looking at the universal in- fluence which wealth has obtained over every institution, and every grade of the social system, what more is wanting to induce the many to be- lieve, as sober truth, the ironical definition of the satirist, that " Worth means wealth — and wisdom, the art of acquiring it 1 ' ' " Whatever men are taught highly to respect, gradually acquires the rank of a virtue." Well, therefore, has it been said, by a master of philos- ophy, that "the honors of a state, direct the COVETOUSNESS IN BRITAIN. n\f esteem of a people ; and that, according to the esteem of a people, is the general direction of mental energy and genius." The consequence ofafhxingthe highest worldly rewards to wealth, is, that to be ricli, is accounted a merit, and to be poor an offence. Nor is this the worst : a false standard of morality is thus created, by which it is made of less consequence to be wise and virtuous, than to be rich. The appalling degree to which such a stand- ard has obtained among us may be inferred from the manner in which it has imprinted itself on our language. It is true that many of the terms and phrases alluded to, may some- times be employed with an exclusive reference to property, and quite irrespective of moral worth. They are, however, idioms of the lan- guage, and as such would soon give rise to the debasing associations in question, even if those associations did not exist before. But the tones in which they are commonly uttered, and the emotions of admiration or contempt with which they are accompanied, abundantly testify that such associations already exist. Justly has a foreign writer observed, for instance, that " the supreme influence of wealth, in this country, may be judged of by the simple phrase, that a man is said to be worth so jnuch," — worth just so much as his money amounts to, and no more. " Poor creature ! " is an ex- clamation as frequently uttered to express con- tempt as pity, and may indicate that the object of it, unites in himself all kinds of wretchedness, 90 THE PRESENT PREDOMINANCE OF and many degrees of guilt. How constantly are individuals and families pronounced respectable — that is the favorite pass- word into society — when, if reference were had to their character, to any thing but their wealth, they would be found entitled to anything but respect. What is ordi- narily understood by good society ? Certainly the exclusion of nothing had but poverty : it may exclude every one of the virtues, provided there be a sufficiency of wealth. And when we speak of making a meeting or a society se/ec^, who thinks of employing any other process, if money be the means of admission, than that of raising the price, and thus erecting a test of wealth ? We find ourselves in a world where a thousand conflicting objects propose themselves to our attention, eacli claiming to deserve our supreme regard ; but who thinks of disturbing the ratified decision of generations, that, of all these objects, money is the main chance ? What- ever attainments a man may be making in other respects, yet, as if wealth were the only prize worth contending for in the race of life, he only is said to be getting on in the world who is in- creasing his property. The term gain is not applied to knowledge, virtue, or happiness : it is reserved solely to mark pecuniary acquisi- tions ; it is synonymous with gold, as if nothing but gold were gain, and everything else were comparative loss. And the man whose gains are known to be rapidly increasing, is not only spoken of by the multitude, under their breath, with marked veneration and awe, but, as if he COVETOUSNESS IN BRITAIN. 91 more nearly approached the creative power than any other liuman being, he is said to be making muncy ; — and having said that, eulogy is exhausted, he is considered to be crowned with praise. Could we ascertain the entire amount of na- tional excitement and emotion experienced in the course of a year, and could we then distrib- ute it into classes, assigning each respectively to its own exciting cause, who can for a moment doubt that the amount of excitement arising from the influence and operation of money, di- rect and indirect, would not only exceed that of either of the others, separately considered, but would go near to surpass them altogether ? And wiicn it is remembered th^t this cause is always in operation ; that it has acquired a character of permanence; that our life is spent under the reign of weahh ; how can it be otherwise than that we should become its subjects, if not even its slaves .'* When, year after year, the assem- bled wisdom of the nation is employed for months, discussing, in the hearing of the nation, questions of cost and finance, trying the merit of every proposition by a standard of profit and loss, and thus virtually converting the throne of legislation into a tabic of exchange, it can only follow, that the same standard will be generally adopted in private life to try individual questions. If the body j)olitic be so constituted that the Ex- change is its heart, then every particular pulse in the community will aim to find its health, by beating in unison with it. 9 92 THE PRESENT PREDOMINANCE OF Thus the spirit of gain, which in most coun- tries is only one power amongst many, may here be said to be tutelary and supreme j and the love of money, from being an occasional pursuit, becomes, in innumerable instances, a rooted and prevailing passion. Nor is it possible for piety itself to escape the infection. To live here, is to live in the Temple of Mammon ; and it is im- possible to see the God worshipped daily, to be- hold the reverence of the multitude, to stand in the presence of the idol, without catching the contagion of awe, and yielding to the sorcery of wealth. Are our religious assemblies exempt from the debasing influence 1 *' My brethren," said the apostle James, " have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with respect of persons. For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment ; and ye have respect unto him that weareth the gay clothing, and say unto him, Sit thou here in a good place ; and say to the poor, Stand thou there, or sit here under my footstool : are ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become judges of evil thoughts ? " The apostle is depre- cating that homage to wealth which implies that it is honorable for its own sake alone, and that poverty is disgraceful, however borne ; a homage which, while it is sinful every where, cannot be practised in the sanctuary without offering pecu- liar insult to the throne of God. But did not the apostle draw this picture prophetically of the COVETOUSNRSS IN BRITAIN. 93 present day ? Could he now witness, says Scott, in his comment on this scripture, what takes place generally in this matter, and give his opin- ion of it, would he not repeat the censure that we are influenced by corrupt reasonings and erroneous calculations? and utter it in words even more severe ? And would he not find, it may be added, that the influence of wealth has penetrated deeper still? that it not only sits in the presence of God while poverty stands, but that it often rules there while poverty serves ; that in that sacred enclosure, where men should take rank only by superiority of spiritual excel- lence, wealth, in many instances, lords it over character, and reigns with a sway as undisputed as it exercises in the world ? Has the management of our benevolent societies escaped the prevailing evil? The guardians of the funds of benevolence, indeed, cannot too carefully protect them from exorbitant charges, and a wasteful expenditure; but, at the same time, they are not, under the plea of economy, to refuse to the tradesman a remunerating'profit. Yet tradesmen are occasionally heard to com- plain that such is the fact; that the grinding system of some of our religious committees leaves them to do business for nothing. Besides which, is there not, in many instances, too much reli- ance placed on the efficacy of money for the ac- complishment of religious objects? too much deference paid to wealth in the selection of chair- men, ofhcers, and members? too evident a dis- position to estimate tlie prosperity of an institu- 94 THE PRESENT PREDOMINANCE OF tion by the amount of its funds'? too much of a pecuniary rivalry with kindred institutions 1 and too little delicacy about the means employed to swell the funds, provided only the increase take place 1 Is it not equally true of the institution that "maketh haste to be rich," as of the man, that it " cannot be innocent 1 " Are our public meetings of benevolence free from the taint ? Is there nothing questionable in the way in which money is raised on those occasions ? nothing of a worldly mechanism for raising benevolence to the giving point ? nothing of the anxiety of a pecuniary adventure felt, by those most deeply interested, at the commence- ment of a meeting ? and, as the pecuniary ex- periment proceeds, is not that anxiety increased as to how the speculation will succeed 1 Are there not occasions when our platforms exhibit a scene too much resembling a bidding for no- tice ? — The writer feels that he is treading on delicate ground ; nor has he advanced thus far on it without trembling. He is fully aware that many of those scenes to which he alludes have originated spontaneously, unexpectedly, and from pure Christian impulse : — would that the number of such were increased ! He does not forget that some of the agents of benevolence who are most active in promoting a repetition of such scenes, are among the excellent of the earth. He bears in mind, too, that among those whose names are proclaimed as donors on such occasions, are some whom it is a privilege to know ; men who give privately as publicly ; COVETOUSNESS IN BRITAIN. 95 whose ordinary charity is sinn:le-handed. And he feels convinced that the ruling motive of all, is, to enlarge the sphere of Christian beneficence to the glory of the grace of God. Nor can he be insensible to the unkind construction to which these remarks, however humbly submitted, are liable to expose him ; or to the avidity with which the captious and the covetous will seize and turn them to their own unhallowed account; or to the force of the plea that the best things are open to abuse, and that it is easy to raise ob- jections against the purest methods and means of benevolence. Still, however, he feels himself justified in respectfully submitting to the Chris- tian consideration of those most deeply concerned in the subject, whether our anxiety for the attain- ment of the glorious cnd^ has left us sufficiently jealous for the purity of the means ; whether some of these means do not call for reconsidera- tion ; whether they do not too directly appeal to motives which the gospel discountenances and disowns ; and whether they rely sufficiently on the power of Christian appeal to Christian prin- ciple ; — whether, in fine, the mechanical spirit of the age is not beginning to influence the sup- ply of our funds, to the injury of the spirit of genuine benevolence. But does not the very fact, that novel and questionable means are sometimes resorted to for the purpose of replenishing the funds of be- nevolence, imply that ordinary and approved methods had failed to answer that eml ? in other words, that the charge of covetousness lies against 9* 96 COVETOUSNESS IN BRITAIN. the prof essors of the gospel generally ? But, be- sides this presumptive evidence of the charge, it is easy to substantiate it by two direct proofs — the first, derived from their conduct in the world ; and the second, from their conduct in the church. Who has not heard of the morality of trade as differing materially from the standard morality of the gospel 1 Yet, how small the number of Christian professors who perceive the guilt of this moral solecism ! How few who do not easily fall in, for the sake of pecuniary advantage, with the most approved worldly methods of increasing their profits ! Blinded by the love of gain, and justifying themselves on the ground of custom and self-defence, the sense of right is overruled, and conscience itself becomes a victim on the altar of mammon. The other proof of the covet- ousness of the church may be deduced from the very fact, that its contributions to the cause of mercy are annually increasing. For it proves, either that, having reached the standard mark of liberality, we are now yearly exceeding it, or else that, with slow and laborious steps, we are only as yet advancing towards it. If the latter — does not the increase of every present year cast a reproach back on the comparative parsi- mony of every past year ? Will not the aug- mented liberality of next year reproach the nig- gardliness of this 1 SECTION V. THE DISGUISES OF COVETOUSNESS. Easv as it is, however, to demonstrate the prevalence of covelousness, — to convict the in- dividual conscience of the evil, to bring home the charge personally so as to produce self-accu- sation, is one of the last efturls in which we hope for success. Men think not of covetousness, and of themselves, at the same time. He who can decide, with equal facility and precision, the exact point at which cupidity begins in another, no sooner finds the same test about to be applied to himself than he discovers a number of excep- tions, which render the standard totally inappli- cable. It was remarked by St. Francis de Sales, who was greatly resorted to in his day as a con- fessor, that none confess the sin of covetousness. And he who " knew what was in man," sought to alarm our vigilance, by saying of this sin what he said so emphatically of no other, *' Take heed, and beware of it." It is true of every passion, that it has an estab- 98 THE DISGUISES OF COVETOUSNESS. lished method of justifying itself; but of covet- ousness it may be said that all the passions awake to justify it; they all espouse its cause, and draw in its defence, for it panders to them all : *' Money answereth all ends," The very prevalence of the evil forms its most powerful protection and plea ; for " the multi- tude never blush." We might have supposed that its prevalence would have facilitated its de- tection and exposure in individual cases ; but owing to its very prevalence it is that so few are conscious of it. We keep each other in coun- tenance. Having been born in the climate, we are not aware of any thing pernicious in it. The guilt of this, as of every other sin, is measured by a graduated scale ; and as all around us in- dulge in it up to a certain point of the scale, it is only from that point we allow covetousness be- gins ; we begin to reckon guilt only from that point. Indignation is reserved till that point is passed, and the passion has become monstrous and extreme. Because we are not a community of Trumans, Elwes and Dancers, we exchange looks of congratulation, and flatter ourselves that we are innocent. The very resentment which we let loose on such personifications of the vice, seems to discharge us from all suspicion, and to grant us a fresh dispensation to indulge in the quiet of ordinary covetousness. Yet, often is it to be feared, that very resentment is the mere offspring of jealousy ; like the anger awakened in a community of the dishonest, at finding that one of their number has violated the rules of THE DISGUISES OF COVETOUSNESS. 99 the body, by secreting more than his share of booty. But tliat which constitutes the strength of cov- etousness, is, its power to assume the appear- ance of virtue : like ancient armor it is at once protection and disguise. '* No advocate will venture to defend it under its own proper charac- ter. Avarice takes the license used by other felons, and, by the adoption of an alias^ escapes the reprobation attached toils own name."* In the vocabulary of covetousness, worldliness means industry ; though it is obvious to every Christian observer, that the pretended industry of many a religious professor is the destruction of his piety, and will eventually form the ground of his condemnation. Idleness is his pretended aversion. His time, his strength, his solicitudes, are all drained off in the service of Mammon; while nothing is left for religion but a faint sigh, a hurried heartless prayer, and an occasional struggle so impotent as to invite defeat. " But Providence," he pleads, " has actually filled his hands with business without his seek- ing ; and would it not be ungrateful to lose it by neglect r " But have you never heard, we might reply, that God sometimes tries his people, to see whether they will keep his commandments or not 1 and may he not be now proving how far the verdure of your piety can resist the ex- haling and scorching sun of prosperity .'' Besides, is it supposable that God intended you to inter- * Mrs, More. 100 THE DISGUISES OF CQVETOUSNESS. pret his grant of worldly prosperity into a dis- charge from liis service, and a commission in the service of Mammon ? And, more than all, sig- nificantly as you may think his providence in- vites you to labor for the bread that perisheth, does not his gospel, his Son, your Lord and Re- deemer, call you a thousand-fold more emphatic- ally to labor for the meat which endurctli unto eternal life ? You maij be misinterpreting the voice of his providence ; the voice of his gospel you cannot misunderstand ; it is distinct, imper- ative and incessant ; urging you daily to " seek first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness." Another individual is a slave to parsimony; but he is quite insensible to it, for the tempta- tion solicits him under the disguise of frugality. Waste is his abhorrence ; and he knows no ref- uge from it but in the opposite extreme. Every new instance of impoverished prodigality is re- ceived by him as a warning from Providence to be careful. His creed is made up of all the ac- credited maxims and world-honored proverbs in favor of covetousness, the authority of which he never questions, and the dexterous application of which fortifies his mind with an antidote against all the contagious attacks of charity. And thus, though he lives in a world supported by bounty, and hopes, perhaps, to be saved at last by i^race, he gives only wlien shame will not allow him to refuse, and grudges the little which he gives. The aim of another is evidently the accumu- lation of wealth ; but the explanation which he DISGUISES OF COVETOUSNESS. 101 gives to himself of liis conduct, is, that he de- sires simply to i)rovide for the future. Want is his dread. And though, in his aim to avoid this evil, he may not distinctly propose to him- self to hecome rich, yet what else can result from his constantly amassing 1 His interpreta- tion of competence, if candidly avowed, is offiu- rnce ; a dispensation from labor to himself and family to the end of time, a discharge from fu- ture dependence on Providence, a perpetuity of ease and sloth. Till he has succeeded in reach- ing that enviable state, his mind is full of forebod- ing; he can take no thought eircpt for the mor- row. As if Providence had vacated its throne, and deserted its charge, he takes on himself all the cares and burdens belonging to his state ; and, laden with these, he is totally disqualified for every hf)ly duty and Christian enterprise which would take him a single step out of his way to competence. And often is he to be seen providing for the infirmities of age long after these infirmities have overtaken him, and labor- ing to acquire a competence up to the moment when a competence for him means only the ex- penses of his funeral. In the instance of a person who has attained to competence, covetousness often seeks to es- cape detection under the name of contentment. lie fancies that he is completely vindicated from the charge of cupidity, by saying, " I am quite content with what I have." But so also that minion of wealth whom our Lord introduces with the solemn warning, " Take heed, and beware 102 THE DISGUISES OF COVETOUSNESS. of covetousness." His contentment is only cov- etousness reposing selt-coniplacently from its toils, resting on its vvell-lilled bags, and saying, ** Soul, take thine ease." Let an agent of char- ity approach him with outstretched and imploring hand, and, as if touched by llhuriel's spear, he will forthwith start into his proper character, and demonstrate that his contentment depends on his keeping his property entire ; at least, that he is not content to give. And another not only most confidently acquits himself of all sus))icion of selfishness, but even appropriates the credit of being benevolent, on the ground of his natural scnsibiliti/. A specta- cle of sufl'ering harrows up his soul ; and there- fore " he passes by on the other side." An ob- ject of destitution afflicts his too delicate sympa- thies ; and, therefore, he closes his door against it, saying, " Depart in peace, be thou warmed and tilled ; " and leaves it in its destitution to perish. And thus, by belonging to the school of Rousseau or of Sterne, he gives himself the credit of belonging to the school of Christ ; by paying the tax of a sigh to wretchedness, he escapes the levy of a heavier tribute, and even purchases a character for the tenderest susceptibility. But sensibility is not benevolence ; by wasting itself on trifles, it may render us slaves to selfishness, and unfit us for every thing but scZ/'-commisera- tion. Covetousness will sometimes indulge itself under the pretence of ])reparing to retire from the cares and turmoil of active life. The propriety THE DISGUISES OF COVETOUSNESS. 103 of an early retirement from business, must de- pend, of course, on circumstances. But how often does the covetousness which wears this mask, retain her slave in her service, even to hoary Iiairs, putting liim off from time to time with delusive promises of approaching emanci- pation. Or else, lie retires to spend, in slothful and selfish privacy, that which he had accumu- lated by years of parsimony. Or else, by ming- ling readily in scenes of gaiety and amusement, he shows that his worldly aversions related, not to the world of pleasure, but only to the world of business. Instead of fixing his abode where his pecuniary resources and Christian activity might have rendered him an extensive blessing, he con- sults only his own gratification, establishes him- self at a distance, it may be, from "the place of the altar," and, in a regular round of habitual indulgence, lives and dies an unfaithful steward, a sober sensualist, a- curse rather than a blessing. Sometimes covetousness is heard enlarging complacently on the necessity, and even piety, of providing for children. And here, be it re- membered, we are not considering what parcwfa/ duty may dictate on this subject, but only what covetousness often does under its borrowed name. Many a parent gratifies his love for money, while pretending a love for his children. The facility, too, with which he quotes certain passages of Scripture, to defend the course he is pursuing, shows how acceptable to his numerous class an ar- gument would be in favorof hoarding, since these few perverted sentences which only stem to sanc- 10 104 THE DISGUISES OF COVETOUSNESS. tion it, are his favorite and most familiar texts. Of these, his chosen strong-hold, perhaps, is the declaration of the apostle, ** He that provideth not for his own, and especially for those of his own house, hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel." The sacred writer, in giving directions relative to the maintenance of widows, distinguishes between such as the church should relieve, and such as should be supported by their own relatives ; and concerning the latter he makes the statement in question. Whence it fol- lows, first, that the provision contemplated by the apostle is not laying up beforehand for future contingencies, but a present supply of present ne- cessities, a simple maintenance of needy relatives from day to day. And, secondly, (hat, instead of countenancing parents in the accumulation of great fortunes for their children, he is speak- ing of the maintenance which children, if able, should afford to their aged and destitute parents. With the siihiect of providing for fa?nilies, there- fore, the text in question has nothing to do. Rightly interpreted, we see that it enjoins, not accumulating but giving. How humiliating is the only explanation which can be given of the general perversion of this scripture, and of the pertinacity with which that perversion is retained. Let the Christian parent compare the merits of a useful education, and a qualification for business or a profession, with the merits of that state of so-called independence in which he is toiling to place his family ; and let him call in the aid of Scripture and of prayer, that he may THE DISGUISES OF COVETOUSNESS. 105 conduct the comparison aright, and we will not fear for the result. Let him look around his neighborhood, and institute a comparison, if he can, between the apparent character and happi- ness of the six nearest individuals who have been left dependent, under God, on their own exer- tions for respectability and support, and the six who have been left independent of personal ex- ertion, indeed, but pitiably dependent on wealth alone for happiness, and let him say which state is preferable for virtue and enjoyment. Let him say, what is to be thought of the consistency of a Christian parent, who, with our Lord's rep- resentation of the danger of riches ringing in his ears, goes on scheming and laboring, to leave his children rich in the element of destruction ; toiling to place them in a condition in which, he admits, it is all but impossible that they should be saved. Let him ask himself, whether such an one be not acting over again, on a smaller scale, the part of the Tempter, when he brought the king- doms of the world and the glory of them to the Saviour's feet 1 Let him remember, not only that he is to leave his children behind hini in a world where wealth is thought to be every thing, but that he is to meet them again in a world where it will be nothing — where it will be re- membered only in relation to the purposes to which it has been applied. SECTION VI. TESTS OF COVETOUSNESS. But, the more insidious and seductive the forms of covetousness, and the greater its preva- lence, the more necessary does it become to study the disease in its symptoms ; to trace it to its earliest signs, and view it in its slightest in- dications. In order, however, that the patient may benefit by the investigation, skill is not more indispensable in the physician, than a solicitous impartiality in himself. In vain would it be even for the great Physician to specify the various signs of this moral malady, unless those who are the subjects of it voluntarily lay bare their breasts, and anxiously lend themselves to ascertain whether or not the plague-spot be upon them. Without this, they would close their eyes to the presence of ninety-nine symptoms, and ac- cept the absence of the hundredth as a demon- stration of their perfect freedom from the taint ; while, on the other hand, a tender and faithful TESTS OF COVETOUSNESS. 107 conscience would overlook the absence of the ninety-nine, and take alarm at the presence of the hundredth. The absence of one or two out of numerous symptoms of a bodily disease, does not warrant us hastily to conclude that we are totally exempt from danger, and to congratulate ourselves on our escape ; for we recollect that few persons exhibit all the signs of any disease. And moral diseases, like physical, are modified by temperament and circumstances ; so that if some of the indications of the malady in question are wanting, a little impartial examination may disclose others sufficiently determinate to awaken alarm, and produce humiliation. "What are those signs, then," we will sup- pose the reader to inquire, " what are some of those signs whose presence would indicate the existence of covetousncss in nuj character ? " And here, reader, we would remind you that the inquiry is to be conducted under the eye of God ; that a consultation of physicians over your dying bed would not call for greater seriousness than the present exercise ; and that an appeal to Omniscience, and a prayer for seasonable grace, would not be the least favorable tokens of your earnestness and desire to be benefited. You have seen the prevalence of covetousness, and its power of insinuation under fictitious names : are you now, for the first time subject- ing your heart to a thorough inspection on the subject? but ought not this simple fact that you are doing it now for the first time, to excite your suspicions, and prepare you to find, that, while 10* 108 TESTS OF COVETOUSNESS. you have been sleeping, the enemy has been sowing tares in your lieart ? Taking it for granted that you are hving in the habit of com- munion with God, you no doubt advert, from time to time in the language of lamentation and confession, to various sins which have never ap- peared in your conduct, but which, as a common partaker of sinful humanity, you suspect to exist seminally in your heart; — is covetousness named among them 1 — When last did you deprecate it 1 when last were you earnest in prayer for a spirit of Christian liberality 1 Your station, property, or mental character invest you, it may be, with a measure of author- ity and influence ; do you ever employ that pow- er to oppress and to overrule right ? Are you, what the poor denominate, hard-hearted? capa- ble of driving a hard bargain? rigid and inex- orable as an Egyptian task-master in your mode of conducting business 1 enforcing every legal claim, pressing every demand, and exacting ev- ery obligation to the extremest point of justice? Are you, what is commonly denominated mean 1 cutting down the enjoyments of those dependent on you to the very quick 1 never rewarding ex- ertion a tittle beyond what is " in the bond ? " doling out requital for services with so niggardly a hand, that Want alone would submit to your bondage ? Can you " go beyond, and defraud another in any matter ? " Do not hastily resent the ques- tion ; for only remember, first, the nmltiplied laws which already exist against fraud ; and the TESTS OF COVETOUSNESS. 109 insufficiency of this vast and complicated appara tus, as implied in the continued labors of the leg islature to prevent, and of the executive to pun- ish, fraud — all intimating the dreadful prevalence of the evil. Recollect, also, that no multiplica- tion of laws can supply the place of principle and integrity; artifice would still find a way o£ escape through the finest network of human legis- lation. Then, again, bear in mind the grievous but acknowledged fact, that two kinds of moral- ly obtain in life — the morality of private life, all sensitiveness, delicacy and honor ; and the moral- ity of business, all secrecy in its own movements — all vigilance respecting the movements of others — all suspicion of their representations — all protestation and confidence of the superior excellence of its own wares — all depreciation of theirs — a morality that deems a thousand things justifiable in business, which in private life would be condemned. Now, we take it for granted that you would not violate the law ; that you would shudder at the bare shadow of dis- lionesty ; — but do you never avail yourself in business of the ignorance and weakness of oth- ers ? Do you ever take advantage of that class of the secrets of your business, which, though deemed defensible by the world, are, to say the least, of a doubtful character ? Are you satisfied with escaping, and, perhaps, barely escaping the penalty of the law ? and with pleading that you are only doing as others do ? and all this for the sake of a little paltry gain ? Providence, perhaps, has assigned you a sta- 110 TESTS OF C0VET0USNES3. tion in society, which, though it leaves many below you, places numbers above you. Are you content with the allotment ? If you regard your own situation with dissatisfaction, and the supe- rior advantages of others with envy, and speak disparagingly of their merits, and repine at your worldly circumstances, though at the same time the imperishable treasures of grace are placed within your reach, — what are you but saying, in effect, that no heavenly wealth can compensate in your esteem for the unrighteous mammon after which you pine ? We have adverted to the numerous maxims and proverbs by the currency and frequent rep- etition of which the world seeks to fortify itself against the claims of benevolence, and to justify itself in its all-grasping endeavors ; — do you find these maxims occasionally falling, in self-justifi- cation, from your own lips ? He whom you acknowledge as your Lord and Master has de- clared that "it is more blessed to give than to receive," — a saying which falls like a paradox, an enigma, an impossibility, on the infidel covet- ousness of the human heart, — do you find that your heart, when left to itself, sympathizes more cordially on this point with your Master or with the world ? The same Divine authority has pronounced it to be a characteristic of the pagan and ungodly world, to care for the pro- vision of their temporal wants as solicitously as if no Providence superintended the world, no " heavenly Father," cared for them ; — do you stand apart from the irreligious in this respect? TESTS OF COVETOUSNESS. Ill If tlieir conduct proves that they have no God, does yours prove that you have one 1 If the world could lay open your breast, would it not be justified in concluding that though you have a God, you cannot trust him 1 that, in temporal things, you are obliged, after all, to do as they do — rely exclusively upon yourself? And when the hour returns lor your appearance in the closet, in the sanctuary, at the i)ost of Christian usefulness and benevolence, but returns to mourn your absence — where then are you to be searched for with the greatest likelihood of being found 1 At the altars of mammon 1 amidst the engrossing cares and services of the world? Does not the dread of a petty loss, or the pro.^pect of a petty gain, fill you with emotions beyond what the magnitude of either would warrant 1 And were a committee of the wisest and the best of men to sit in friendly judgment on your worldly afl'airs, would they not be likely to pronounce that your mind might be safely dis- charged of all that solicitude which now disturbs it, and be left entirely free for the service of God? You confers that God may justly com- plani of you as slothful and unfaithful in his ser- vice ; — would INlammon be justified in urging a similar complaint ? or, rather, may he not boast of you as one of his most diligent and exemplary servants? Are you providing more earnestly for the future moments of time than for the future ages of eternity ? Arc you spending life in pro- viding the means of living, and are you thus living to no end ? Are you preparing to depart ? 112 TESTS OF COVETOUSNESS. or, would death find you saying, *' Soul, take thine ease ? " counting your gains ? loth to quit your possessions? and " setting your affections on things on the earth ? " Have you engaged in any worldly avocation or object, not from necessity, but choice ? and merely to augment your means of ostentation and indulgence? And are you to be found giving early notice to the world of any little addition made to your property, by an instant addition to your establish- ment or expenditure ? Were two courses open to you, the one bright with gold, but beset with temptation ? the other less lucrative, but rich in religious advantages, — which would you be like- ly to adopt ? Are you, at times, tempted to vow that you will never give any thing more in charity? In- stances are by no means of rare occurrence of imposture practised on the generous, and of kindness requited with ingratitude, and of be- nevolent funds unfaithfully administered ; and some of these painful examples may have come under your own observation :^do you detect yourself, at such times, storing them up as argu- ments against future charity ? conveying them, as weapons of defence, into the armory of covet- ousness, to be brought out, and employed at the next assault upon your purse ? When you are called to listen to a discourse on ilie perils at- tending the possession of wealth, does the seed fall into congenial soil ? or, is it neessary, as often as the subject is introduced, that the speak- er should reproduce his " strong arguments," in TESTS OF COVETOUSNESS. 113 order to reproduce full conviction i.i your mind? Which, tiiiiik you, would make a greater demand on your patience — an argument to prove that you ought to give more to the cause of benev- olence? or, an excuse and justification for giving less ? You may sometimes find yourself passing a silent verdict of praise or blame on the pecunia- ry conduct of others : now, when you see an in- dividual more than ordinarUy careful of his mon- ey, do you regard him with a feeling of compla- cency ? when you hear his conduct condemned, are you disposed to speak in his defence ? or, when you see a person prodigal of his property, is your feeling that of astonishment, as if he were guilty of a sin which you could not com- prehend ? It is hardly j)ossible that the tempeiature of benevolence should remain quite stationary at the same point, in any mind, for years togeth- er : now, on instituting a comparison between the past and the present, do you find that you have sudered no decrease of genuine sensibili- ty ? that you are quite as accessible to the ap- peals of beneficence now, as you were ten or twenty years ago, and ^conscious of as much pleasure in yielding to thorn ? It is highly im- probable that your worldly affairs are precisely the same now as they were at that distance of time; but, if the change has been on the side of prosperity, have the oblations which you have laid on the altar of gratitude been propor- tionally increased ? or, if the change has been 114 TESTS OF COVETOUSNESS. adverse, have your gifts been decreased only in proportion ? And, among your regrets at the change, are you conscious of a pang at the ne- cessity of that decrease ? It is to the honor of the present day, that the calls of benevolence multiply fast ; — which, is there reason to believe, you resent more, their rapid multiplication, or your inability to meet them all? But, in order to meet them, have you never thought of retrenching any superflu- ity'? of reducing your expenditure? or, do you only practise that precarious and cheap benev- olence, which waits for the crumbs that fall from your table ? You may be scrupulously abstaining from certain worldly amusements ; but, having mark- ed off a given space in which you do not allow yourself to range, how are you conducting your- self in that portion in which you do move ? Are you not vying with the world in self-gratifi- cation ? thinking of little besides the mukiplica- tion of your comforts? living under the domin- ion of the inferior appetites ? as far removed from the salutary restraints and self-denial of the gospel, as from the exploded austerities of the monastic life ? In mechanics, the strength of a moving power is estimated by the amount of resistance which it overcomes; now, what is the strength of your benevolence when tried by a similar test ? what does it overcome ? does it resist and bear down your vanity, love of ease, and self-interest ? does it impel you to sacrifice " the pride of life," that you may increase your contributions to the cause of mercy? TESTS OF COVETOUSNESS. 115 Of how many professing Christians may it not be appropriately asked, not only *' How are you living, but where 1 " You have retired from business, it may be ; but, in taking that step, whose will did you consult? Did you refer it to the good pleasure of God ? did you retire, that you might do more good than before? and are you doing it? did you look out for a sphere in which you might render yourself useful ? But, whether you were formerly immersed in the business of the world or not, have you escaped from a worldly spirit? In the choice of your place of abode, in the distribution of your time, and the formation of your plans, do you take counsel from the word of God? Are you acting on the Christian motto, " No man liveth to him- self? " and are you employing your various talents as if they came to you, bearing this in- scription, from the hand that lends them, " Oc- cupy till I come ? " You may hear occasionally of a munificent donation made unexpectedly by Christian grati- tude to the cause of God ; — what is your first emotion at the report ? — admiration of the act ? and gratitude to the grace which produced it? — or a feeling that the donor has unnecessarily exceeded the rw/es of ordinary benevolence ? and a disposition to impute motives of vanity and ostentation? If a benevolent mind had con- ceived some new project of mercy requiring pe- cuniary support, would your presence be a con- genial atiriosphere for the bud to unfold in? or, would the first emotion expressed in your coun- 11 116 TESTS OF COVETOUSNESS. tenance be a chilling doubt, or a blighting, withering frown 1 True benevolence is not only voluntary, as opposed to reluctant — it is often spontaneous, as opposed to solicited ; — but does yours always expect to be waited on ? has it always to be reminded ? does it need to be urged ? does it never anticipate the appeal, and run to meet its object 1 And when you do give, is it your object to part with as little as you can without shame, as if you were driving a hard bargain with one who sought to overreach you 1 and is that little parted with reluctantly, with a half-closed hand, as if you were discharging a doubtful debt on compulsion 1 Is it given with the air of a capitulation, or bribe to importunity, leaving the applicant who receives it ill at ease ? Do you think highly of the trifle you give 1 not only calculating beforehand how much you can spare, but frequently remembering it afterwards? pluming yourself on the benevolent exploit ? looking out for its emblazonment in the ensuing Report 1 and wondering how men can deny them- selves the luxury of doing similar good ? — then the mark of selfishness is upon you. For, only remember how cheerfully you are constantly parting with similar sums for the purpose of sell- indulgence, soon forgetting them, and repeating them again, " thinking nothing of them." But to lay open the sin in all its disguises is impossible. These are mere hints for its detec- tion. Owing to their deficiency, however, or to your own negligence in applying them, the evil sought for may still be undiscovered. But let TESTS OF COVETOUSNESS. 117 nothing flatter you into the persuasion tliat you are exempt from it. If any believer of the Jew- ish church Could have defied its remotest ap- proaches, surely that saint was David: if any description of natural character could form a guarantee against the sin, here was a man who appears to have brouji^ht with him into the world the elements of magnanimity and generosity of soul ; yet we hear him cry, in the full conscious- ness of danger, *' Incline my heart unto thy tes- timonies, and not unto covetousness." If any order of piety in the Christian church could have claimed entire immunity from the sin, surely it was that to which Timothy belonged. Yet we hear the apostle Paul warning even him. He had seen so many apparent proficients in piety drawn in by this moral Maelstroom^ and *' drowned in perdition," that he called on his " dearly beloved Timothy, his own son in the faith " — called on him with more than his usual earnestness — to flee to the greatest distance from this fatal vortex. " O man of God," said he, "flee these things." As if, by a special appointment of Heaven, the monitory strain ad- dressed to a mail of God — to such a man of God — and echoing through the church in all ages, should make it inexcusable for all inferior piety ever to doubt its liability to the sin. Of all the myriads who have appeared on the face of the earth, Jesus Christ is the only being who was entirely free from the taint. But he was; he embodied the very opposite principle ; he was the personification of love. This it was which 118 TESTS OF COVETOUSNESS. constituted his fitness to wage war with selfish- ness, and to become the Leader of the hosts of the God of love in their conflicts with a selfish world. Had they been faithful to his cause, long ere this they would have reaped the fruits of a final and universal conquest. " But all seek their own ; not the things which are Jesus Christ's," SECTION VII THE GCJILT AND EVILS OP COVETOUSNESS. Of the love of money, the Apostle declares that it ** is the root of all evil." Not that he meant to lay it down as a universal proposition that every act of wickedness originates in cupid- ity. But that, while many other sources of sin exist, there is no description of crime which this vice has not prompted men to commit. Of the life-giving tree of prophetic vision it is recorded, as a miracle of fertile variety, that ** it bare twelve manner of fruits ; " but, as if to eclipse that heavenly wonder, here is an earthly root yielding poisons and death, at all times, and in endless variety. On no subject, perhaps, are the Scriptures more copious and minute than on the sin of cov- etousness. If a faithful portrait of its loathsome character can induce us to hate it ; if a sight of the virtues which it has extinguished, the vices with which it has often associated, and the depraved characters in whom it has most flour- 11* 120 THE GUILT AND EVILS ished ; if the tenderest dissuasives from it, and the terrors of the Lord warning us against it; if Sinai and Calvary uniting and protesting against it, — if all this combined can deter us from the sin of covetousness, then the Scriptures have omitted nothing which could save us from its guilty contamination. "Thou shalt not covet." Such is the lan- guage of that command which not only concludes, but at the same tim6 completes, and guards, and encompasses the moral law. If love be the ful- filling of the law, it follows that the whole dec- alogue is to be regarded as law against selfish- ness ; so that every selfish aiid every covetous act is, in effect, an infraction of the whole late. It is to love ourselves at the expense both of God and our neighbor. Covetousness appears to have been the princi- pal element in the first transgression. For did not the sin consist, chiefly, in an inordinate de- sire for an object on which God had virtually written, "Thou shalt not covet," and which properly belonged to another ? in a disposition which originates all the acts of a grasping cu- pidity 1 It is observable that the terms in which the primary sin is described, bear a close resem- blance to those in which Achan describes his covetous act. " When I saw among the spoils," said he, '* a goodly Babylonish garment, and a wedge of gold, then I coveted them and took them." " And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one OF COVETOUSNESS. 121 wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat." She saw, she coveted, she partook. And having entered into the composition of the first sin, and thus acquired a bad pre-emi- nence, it has maintained its fatal ascendency under each succeeding dispensation of religion. Covetousness in the person of Lot, appears to have been the great sin of the patriarchal dis- pensation. The hope of increasing his wealth allured him first to pitch his tent near Sodom, and at length prevailed on him to enter the city, and to breathe its pestilential atmosphere ; in con- sequence of which he became subsequently in- volved in acts so grossly sinful, that all the im- perfections of the other patriarchs combined to gether, seem insignificant compared with it, nor should we probably have supposed that he was a subject of piety, had not the Bible assured us of the fact. In the instance of Achan, to which we have just alluded, covetousness was the first sin of the Israelites under their new dispensation in Canaan. It violated an express command ; brought defeat on the arms of Israel, and triumph on their foes. What was the first sin of the Christian church ? it was covetousness in the instance of Ananias and Sapphira. It was covetousness which first interrupted the joy, and stained the virgin glory, of the present dispensation. And, presently, we shall see that it will take a leading part in the fearful drama of the final apostacy. The Scriptures exhibit covetousness aspervad- 122 THE GUILT AND EVILS ing all classes of mankind. They describe it as having thrown the world generally into a state of infidel distrust of the Divine Providence, and of dissatisfaction with the divine allotments. *' For after all these things," saith Christ, " do the Gentiles seek." They seek after worldly ob- jects as independently and intently as if there were no providence to care for them, no God to be consulted. They pursue them to the entire neglect of every higher object. Sometimes cov- etousness has been seen actuating and debasing the character of an entire people. Against the Israelites it is alleged, *' From the least of them even unto the greatest of them, every one is given to covetousness." Of Tyre it is said, " By thy great wisdom and by thy traffic hast thou increased thy riches, and thine heart is lifted up because of thy riches thou hast set thine heart as the heart of God." And of Chaldea it is said, *' Wo to him that coveteth an evil covetousness to his house, that he may set his nest on high, that he may be delivered from the power of evil." The insatiable desires, or the continued prosperity and boundless possessions of these nations had left nothing in the national character but rapacity, arrogance, and a proud impiety which braved the very throne of God. Descending to examine the component parts of a nation, we find covetousness infecting and pervading them all. Hear avarice speaking by the mouth of Nebuchadnezzar, *' By the strength of my hand I have done it, and by my wisdom I have robbed their treasures . . . . my OF COVETOUSNESS. 123 hand hatli found as a nest the riches of the peo- ple ; and as one gathereth eggs that are left, have J gathered all the eaith." How vividly does Jeremiah depict its atrocities in the unbridled conduct of a Jewish king ; " Thine eyes and thine heart are not but for thy covetousness, and for to shed innocent blood, and for oppres- sion, and for violence, to do it ? And who that is familiar with sacred history does not here think of Ahab coveting the vineyard of Naboth, and of obtaining it by artifice, subornation, and murder? Covetousness in rulers, leads to bribery and in- justice. " Thoushalt take no gift," said Moses, *' for the gift blindeth the wise, and perverteth the wordsofthe righteous." Accordingly, it is record- ed of the sons of Samuel, that " they walked not in his ways, but turned aside after lucre, and took bribes, and perverted judgment." And of the Jewish rulers, " they are greedy dogs which can never have enough they all look to their own way ; every one for his gain from his quar- ter." And of Felix, that " he hoped that money would have been given him of Paul, that he might loose him." Covetousness has turned the priests and ministers of God into mercenary hire-' lings ; " The heads of Zion judge for reward, and the prophets thereof divine lor money : yet will they lean upon the Lord, and say. Is not the Lord among us? none evil can come upon us." In the department of trade, this sin induces the buyer to depreciate the thing which he wishes to purchase, and the seller to employ " divers 124 THE GUILT AND EVILS weights and measures," — thus generating fraud> falsehood, and injustice : while in both it leads loan impious impatience of the sacred restraints of the Sabbath, inducing them to say, " When will the new moon be gone, that we may sell corn ? and the Sabbath, that we may set forth wheat? making the ephah small, and the shekel great, and falsifying the balances by deceit? that we may buy the poor for silver, and the needy for a pair of shoes ; and sell the refuse of the wheat?" Covetousness turns the master into an oppressor, and the servant into a thief In illustration of the former, the Scripture de- scribes a Laban evading his encraorements with Jacob, "changing his wages ten times," and ex- acting from him years of laborious servitude ; and it denounces those who, though their fields had been reaped, " kept back the hire of the la- borer by fraud." And in illustration of the lat- ter, it exhibits an unscrupulous Gehazi, plausi- bly lying, and enriching himself at the expense of his master's character, and of the honor of God ; and it exhorts servants to " be obedient unto their masters, not purloining, but showing all good fidelity." Thus have alJ classes, in various degrees, lived under the dominion of av- arice. The Scriptures ascribe to the same sin, in whole or in part, some of the foulest acts, and the most fearful results, that have stained the history of man. Some of these we have already named. Oppression, violence, and murder, have been among its familiar deeds. " Wo to them that OF COVETOU8NESS. 126 devise iniquity, and work evil upon their beds! when the morning is light they practise it, be- cause it is in the power of their hands. And they covet fields, and take them by violence ; and houses, and lake them away : so they op- press a man and his house, even a man and his heritage." " So are the ways of every one that is greedy of gain ; who taketh away the life of the owners thereof." In the person of Balaam covetousness essayed to curse the chosen people of God ; but, failing in the infernal attempt, and yet resolved to clutch the promised reward, it devised another course, — it " tauglit Balak to cast a stumbling-block before the children of Israel, to eat things sac- rificed to idols, and to commit fornication." The dreadful device succeeded, the displeasure of God was excited against the people, so that " there fell in one day three and twenty thou- sand." Such was " the way of Balaam, the son of Bosor, who loved the wages of unrighteous- ness." And so ingenious, persevering, and fatally successful, was " Balaam for reward." Covetousness instigated Judas to betray the Son of God, the Savior of the world, " for thirty pieces of silver." It induced Ananias and Sap- phira to " tempt the Holy Ghost to lie, not unto men, but unto God." In the base ex- pectation of turning " the gift of God " to a lu- crative account, it led Simon to offer to purchase that gift *' with money." It has even assumed the sacred office, trod the courts of the Lord, " brought in damnable heresies," and " with 126 THE GUILT AND EVILS feigned words " — words studied to render the heresy palatable and marketable — it has " made merchandise " of men. It converted the Jewish temple into "a den of thieves; " and among the articles of meichandise in the mystical Babylon were seen ** the souls of men." The Scriptural classification of this sin is il- lustrative of its vile and aggravated nature; for it stands associated ivith all the principal sins. In that fearful catalogue of the vices of the heathen world furnished by the apostle Paul, in the first chapter of his Epistle to the Romans, covetousness stands forth conspicuous. When the apostle Peter is describing the char- acter of those false teachers who would arise in the church, — and describing it with a vievv to its being recognised as soon as seen, and hated as soon as recognised, — he names covetousness as one of their leading features. " But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. And through covetousness shall they, with feign- ed words, make merchandise of you." Covetousness will be one of the characteristics of the final apostacy. *' This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, OF COVETOUSNESS. 127 boasters, prourl, blasphemers, disobedient to pa- rents, untlianUful, nnlioly, wiiliout natural aflTec- tion, truce-breakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good, traitors, heady, high-minded, lovers of pleasure more than lovers of G(jd." In the last quotation, covetousness is described as more than an attendant evil of the apostacy — it is one of its very elements. In the following places it is idcntijicd laith idolatry: — " Fornica- tion and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becomeih saints; .... for this ye know, that no whore- monger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God." " JNIortify therefore your members which are upon the earth ; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate af- fection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry : for which things' sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobe- dience." In addition to which, the apostle James evidently idcntijies it with adultery. " Ye covet, and have not ; .... ye ask, and receive not, be- cause ye ask amiss, that ye may consume it up- on your lusts. Ye adulterers and adulteresses, know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God ? whosoever, therefore, will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God." Covetousness is not only subversive of the threef(jld law of Christian duty, personal, social, and divine, but it stands connected with each of the opposite series of vices. *f For from within, 12 128 THE GUILT AND EVILS out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, thefts, covet- ousness." ** I have written unto you, not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner ; with such an one no not to eat." " Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the king- dom of God? Be not deceived: neither forni- cators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effemi- nate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the king- dom of God." " Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin ; beguiling un- stable souls ; a heart they have exercised with covetous practices ; cursed children." In the first part of this classification, we find covetousness distinguishing itself as a prime ele- ment in the great system of heathenism, even when that empire of depravity was at its worst. In the second part, we see it forming a leading feature in the character of men whose enormous impiety the apostle appears to have felt it a labor to describe. In the third, we behold covetous- ness lending an additional shade of horror to the perilous times of the apostacy — times so fearful, in the estimation of the apostle, that we may rest assured he would have admitted into his de- scription of them none but evils of first-rate mag- nitude — and yet covetousness is not only there, it is among the first evils which he specifies. His classification implies, that of all the sins OF COVETOUSNESS. 129 which will then prevail, selfishness will be the prolific root, and covetoiisness the first fruit. So that when the whole history of covetousness shall be read forth from the book of God's re- membrance, it will be found that it entered largely into the first fall of man, and into the last fall of the church; and that, during the long lapse of time between, it never lost its power nor ceased to reign. From the fourth, we learn, that if the word of God identifies covetousness with some sins rather than with others, it is, partly, because those sins rank first in guilt ; leaving us to infer that if there were a sin which ranked higher still, covetousness would have been identified with that sin. What was the great sin of the Jewish dispensation, but the sin of idolatry ? it was to repeal the theocracy, to be guilty of treason against the throne of Heaven. " But," says the apostle Paul, fearful as it is, " covetousness is idolatry." What must have been the abhorrence with which a pious Jew re- garded adultery, when the sin became associated in his mind as the scriptural representation of the guilt of idolatry ! for " Judah committed adultery with stocks and with stones." And yet, great as his conception of its enormity must have been, the apostle James declares of the covetous, that he is violating the most sacred obligations to God, that he is committmg adul- tery with gold. And what can be more fearful in the eyes of a sincere Christian than the sin of apostacy ? of trampling under foot the Son of God ? it is the very consummation of guilt. 130 THE GUILT AND EVILS And yet, fearful as it is, the apostle Peter inti- mates tliat covetousness is apostacy. And from the fifth [)art, we learn that covetousness repeals tlje entire law of love; that it proclaims war against all the virtues included in living " sober- ly, righteously, and godly," and is in sworn con- federacy with all the opposite sins included in personal intemperance, injustice towards men, and impiety towards God. Nor is the reason of this alliance, or scriptural classification, obscure. Covetousness is classed with intemperance — or the sins which appear to terminate on the man himself — because, like them, it tends to debase and imbrute him. It is ranked with injustice — or the sins directed against society — because, like them, if indulged, and carried out, it seeks its gratification, at the expense of all the social laws, whether enacted by God or man. And it is associated with impiety — or sins directly against God — because, like them, it effaces the image of God from the heart, and enshrines an idol there in his stead. Such is a mere outline of the representations of Scripture in relation to the guilt and evils of covetousness. Entering with the first transgres- sion, and violating the spirit of the whole law, it has polluted, and threatened the existence, of each dispensation of religion ; infected all classes and relations of society ; shown itself capable of the foulest acts ; is described as oc- cupying a leading place in the worst state of heathenism, in the worst times of the apostacy, and in the worst characters of those times ; and OF COVETOUSNESS. 131 has the worst sins for its appropriate emblems, and its nearest kindred, and ** all evil " in its train. To exaggerate the evils of a passion which ex- hibits such a monopoly of guilt, would certainly be no easy task. It has systematized deceit, and made it a science. Cunning is its chosen counsellor and guide. It linds its way, as by instinct, through all the intricacies of the great labyrinth of fraud. It parts with no company, and refuses no aid, through fear of contamination. Blood is not too sacred for it to buy, nor religion too divine for it to sell. From the first step in fraud to the dreadful consummation of apostacy or murder, covetousness is familiar with every step of the long, laborious, and fearful path. Could we only see it embodied, what a monster should we behold ! Its eyes have no tears. With more than the fifty hands of the fabled giant it grasps at every thing around. In its march through the world, it has been accompanied by artifice and fraud, rapine and injustice, cruelty and murder ; while behind it have dragged heavily its swarms of victims — humanity bleeding, and justice in chains, and religion expiring under its heavy burdens, orphans, and slaves, and op- pressed hirelings, a wailing multitude, reaching to the skirts of the horizon ; and thus dividing the earth between them, (for how small the number of those who were not to be found either triumphing in its van or suffering in its train,) it has, more than any other conqueror, realised 12* 132 THE GUILT AND EVILS the ambition of gaining the whole world, of establishing a universal empire. From the first step of its desolating course, its victims began to appeal to God ; and, as it has gone on in its guilty career, their cries have been thickening and gathering intenseness at every step, and in every age, till the whole creation, aiding them in their mighty grief, has become vocal with woe and their cries have ascended, " and entered into the ears of the Lord of Sabaoth." " And shall I not visit for these things, saith the Lord ? " Even now his ministers of wrath are arming against it. Even now the sword of ultimate justice is receiving a keener edge for its destruc- tion : it is at large only by respite and suffer- ance, from moment to moment. During each of these moments, its accumulation of pelf is only an accumulation " of w rath against the day of wrath." And when those dreadful stores shall be finally distributed among the heirs of wrath, covetousness shall be loaded with the most ample and awful portion. Its vast capacity, enlarged by its perpetual craving after what it had not, shall only render it a more capacious vessel of wrath, fitted to destruction. From this scriptural representation of the guilt of covetousness, let us proceed to consider some of the specific evils which it inflicts on Christians individually, on the visible church, and, through these, on the world. Were it our object to present a complete cata- logue of the injuries which it inflicts on religion, we should begin by adverting to the fact, that it OF COVETOUSNESS. 133 detains numbers from God. Careful and troub- led about many tilings, they entirely neglect the one thing needful. The world retains them so effectually in its service, that they have no time, no heart, to spare for religion ; and though some of them at times may cast a wistful glance in that direction, and even steal a visit, in thought, to the Savior's feet, yet, like their prototype in the gospel, they " go away sorrowing," for the spell of mammon is upon them. As to the professor of Christianity, the evil in question operates to his injury, partly by engaging so much of that energy for the world, the whole of which would not have been too much for re- ligion. The obstacles to the salvation of a man are so numerous and formidable, that the Scrip- tures represent his ultimate success as depending on his " giving all diligence to it." In the econ- omy of salvation, therefore, God graciously un- dertakes to watch over and provide for his tem- poral wants, that, being relieved from all dis- traction from that quarter, he might be able to bend and devote his chief strength to the attain- ment of heaven. But, in guilty counteraction of this arrangement, the covetous professor di- vides his forces between these two objects most disproportionately. He has but just sufficient fuel to offer up a sacrifice to God, and yet he consumes the principal part of it in sacrificing to mammon. The undivided powers of his mind would not be too much for the claims of religion, and yet he severs and sends the greater proportion of his strength in an opposite direc- 134 THE GUILT AND EVILS tion. The consequence is, that his piety is kept in a low, doubtful, disgraceful state. His relig- ious course is marked with hesitation and em- barrassment. The cares of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, engross the feeling which is the appropriate soil of religion, and which be- longs to it alone. And to expect to reap the fruits of Christian benevolence from such a mind, would be to look for grapes from thorns, and figs from thistles. Nor does covetousness operate less injuriously by taking off his supreme trust from God, and giving it to the world. If a staff be placed in the hand of a bent and feeble man, what more natural than that he should lean on it? Man is that impotent traveller, and wealth is the staff which offers to support his steps. Hence, in the word of God, it is repeatedly intimated that to possess riches, and to trust in them, is one and the same thing, exce}»t where grace makes the distinction. The term mammon^ for instance, according to its derivation, imports whatever men are apt to confide in. The original term for faith is of the same derivation, and for the same reason — because it implies such a reliance on God as the worldly mind places on riches. So that mammon came to signify riches, because men so commonly put their trust on them. And when our Lord perceived the astonishment he had excited by exclaiming " How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of heaven,*' the only explanation which he gave, and which he deemed sufficient, imported, that OF COVETOUSNESS. 135 as the danfi^er of riches consisted in trustinjr in tliem, so the difliciilty of possessiiicr thein, and not frusiins: in them, is next to an impossibility — a difficulty wliich can only be surmounted by omnipotent grace. Now, to trust in any created object, is to par- take of its littlenes*«, mutability and debasement. But money is a creature of circumstances, the sport of every wind ; the Christian mammonist, therefore can only resemble the object of his trust. By choosing a heavenly treasure, and making it the object of paramount regard, he would have crradually received the impress of its cel(?stial attributes ; but by giving his heart to earthly gain, he identifies himself with all its earthly qualities; lets himself down, and adapts himseif to his insignificance ; and vibrates to all its fluctuations, as if the world were an organized body, of which he was the pulse. The inconsistencies in which his covetous at- tachments involve him, are grievous and many. His enlightened judgment impels him for happi- ness in one direction, and his earthly inclina- tions draw him in another. In the morning, and at night, probably, he prays, " Lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil ;" and yet, during the interval, he pursues the material of temptation with an avidity not to be exceeded by the keenest worldling. lie hears, without rpiestioning, our Lord's declaration concerning the danirer of riches; and yet, though he is al- ready laden with the thick day, and is daily augmenting his load, he doubts not of passing 136 THE GUILT AND EVILS through the eye of the needle, as a matter of course. He professes to be the only steward of his property; and yet wastes it on himself, as if he were its irresponsible master. He pretends to be an admirer of men who counted not their lives dear unto them, provided they might serve the cause of Christ ; and yet he almost endures a martyrdom in sacrificing a pittance of his money to the cause ; while to give more than that pittance, especially if it involved an act of self- denial, is a martyrdom he never thought of suf- fering. He prays for the world's conversion, and yet holds back one of the means with which God has entrusted him to aid that specific ob- ject. He professes to have given himself up voluntarily and entirely to Christ ; and yet has to be urged and entreated to relinquish his hold on a small sum which would benefit the church. Indeed, the truths and means of salvation appear to have been so designedly arranged by God to condemn the covetous professor, that were he not blinded by passion, and kept in countenance by so numerous a fellowship, he would hear a rebuke in every profession he utters, and meet with condemnation at every step he takes. Covetousness frequently serves in the stead of a thousand bonds to hold a religious professor in league with the world. Indeed, the sin may be much more potent in him than in many of the avowed ungodly around him. In them, it has to divide the heart with other sinful propensities ; but in him, perhaps, it reigns alone. They can range and wander at will over a larger field of OF COVETOUSNESS. 137 sinful indulfrences, but he ia restricted to this single gratification. As a Christian professor, he riiust abstain from intemperance, licentious- ness, and profanity; but woridliness is a sphere in which he may indulge to a certain extent without suspicion, for the indulgence comes not within human jurisdiction. If he would be thought a Christian, he must not be seen ming- ling in certain society, nor indulging in a certain class of worldly amusements; but, without at all endangering his Christian reputation, he may emulate the most worldly in the embellishment of his house, the decoration of his person, the splendor of his equipage, or the luxury of his table. Accordingly, the only apparent difference between him and them, is — not in the greater moderation of his earthly aims, nor in the supe- rior simplicity of his tastes, the spiritual eleva- tion of his pursuits, the enlarged benevolence and Christian devotedness of his life — but, that the time which they occupy in spending, he em- ploys in accumulating; the energies which they waste in worldly pleasures, he exhausts in world- ly pursuits ; the property which they devote to amusements abroad, he lavishes on indulgences at home ; and while they are pursuing their grat- ification in one direction, he is indemnifying him- self for not joining them by pursuing his grat- ification as eagerly in another. The loss of one of the bodily senses, it is said, quickens the per- ception of those that remain ; woridliness alone remains to him, and that is quickened and strengthened by perpetual exercise. All that is 138 THE GUILT AND EVILS iinsanctified in liis nature flows from the fountain of his heart with the greater force, that it has only this one channel in which to run. He may therefore be the more worldly in reality, for not allowing himself to be worldly in ap[)earance. His worldliness is only compressed into a smaller compass. Profess what he may, and stand as high as he may in the opinion of his fellow- professors, he is essentially a worldly man. The world has its sects as well as the church, and he may be said to belong to one of the " stricter sects " of the world. Covetousness generates discontent ; and this is an element with which no Christian grace can long be held in atVinity. It magnities trivial losses, and diminishes the most magnificent blessings to a point ; it thinks highly of the least sacrifice which it may grudgingly make in the cause of God, feels no enterprise in his service, and never considers itself at liberty to leave its little circle of decent selfishness, in which it mur- murs on account of what it has not are always louder that its thanks for what it has. ** Let your conversation," therefore, says the apostle, " be without covetousness, and be content with such things as ye have." '• Godliness, with con- tentment, is great gain." Covetousness neutralizes the effect of the preaching of tiie gospel. The Savior saw this abundantly verified in his own ministry ; and his parable of the sower intimated, that his minis- ters would see it exemplified in theirs also. The judgment of the hearer, it may be, is convinced OP GOVETOUSNESS. I6\f of tho divinity of rrlifjion ; he feels its power, and trenibk's ; lie Ixiliolds its attractions, and is captivated. And could he, at sncli a time, be detached awhile from liis worldly purf-uits, and he closely plied with the melting and majestic clainis of the gospel, he might, by the agency of the Holy S[)irit, be induced to lay up for him- s'» in*e cal- culating on the certainty and stability of that, which has become the very emblem of change and uncertainty. FOR ITS WANT OF LIBERALITY. 183 What you are proposing to defer till the peri- od of your natural death, tiie Christian, if he acts in harmony with his profession, feels him- self bound to do when he dies unto sin ; then he devotes himself and his property to God ; and with this immense advantage over you, that he will be his own executor ; that he will enjoy the godlike satisfaction of doing, himself, for God, what you will leave to be done by others. You profess to regard yourself only as the steward of your ])roperly, and God as its supreme Propri- etor ; but instead of employing it for his glory, and rendering to him a periodical account of your stewardship, your covetousness makes it necessary that death should deprive you of your office, in order that the property you hold may not lie useless forever. Your Lord admonishes you to make to yourself friends of the mammon of unrighteousness, that when you fail tiiey may receive you into everlasting habitations ; but, however welcome the arrival, and cheering the reception, of the benevolent Christian in heaven, it is evident that no such a greeting can be there awaiting you : the only signs of joy your spirit will meet with, will be occasioned by the libera- tion of your property by the hand of death, and as such, they will wear the aspect of upbraiding and reproach. And when your Lord shall come to receive his own with usury, instead of being able to refer to the multiplication of the talents with which he intrusted you, tliat multii)licati