- i; ■1^;;=;' ■li |iii!|:|:;;;;; PBliJiiJjglv;;;.' y /' •! -^'/ l! .MF BOHN'S STANDARD LIBRARY. Pw/ 8po., Elejautly Frintfd, and bound in Cloth, at Zs. 6d. per Vol. 1 THE MISCELLANEOUS WO?JKS A'slD REMAINS OF THE REV. R03ERT HALL, Willi Memoir l)y Dr. Ukkgoky, and Essay by John Fostku. I'ori.ail. 2 & 3. ROSCOE'S LIFE AND PONTIFICATE OF LEO X.. Edited by his i^on, witli the Copyn;,'lit Notts, Docuiiicdia, i:c. In 2 Vols. Porlralts. 4. SCHLEGELS LECTURES ON THE PHILOSOPHY OF HISTORY. Trinsiatcd from llie German, wiili a .Nicnioir by J. W. IIobkhtson, Esq. Purirtut. 5 & 6. SISMONDI'S HISTORY OF THE LITERATURE OF THE SOUTH OF FIIRHPF Trnnslntp.l l.v Un^^pnv 1 ., -T Vol= V.^,...:t, t\\>x!H >\'^\ ^^;? 29. SHERIOANS DRAMATIC WORKS AND LIFE, rortralt. 31. GOETHE'S WORKS. Vol.1, [lii.s .Vutobioj^raphy. 13 Books.] Porlrait. 35. WHEATLEr ON THE COMMON PRAYER, l-'ronaspiece. 37, 39. 40, 81. & 86. MILTON'S PROSE WORKS. 1" » Vols, with geucrd Inde.x and rortiuils. 38,41, Sc 45. MENZEL'S HISTORY OF GERMANY. Cumplcie m 3 Vols. Portrait. 42. SCHLF.GELS /ESTHETIC AND MISCELLANEOUS WORKS. 43. GOETHE'S WORKS. Vol. 11. [Uemair.aer of !iis .\utobiolcte 111 5 Vols., Willi index. 61. TAYLOR'S (JEREMY) HOLY LIVING AND DYING. Portrait. r 62. GOETHE'S WORKS. Vol. III. ["Faust," "Iplii-renia," "Torquato T.mo," •|fc iiiui " K^ninnt."] Translated liy Miss Swaxwick. With "Goetr voa JJer- 'ilr iichiii^cii," tninsiatcrt Ijy Si a Waltkr Scott. 63, 56, 58. 61, 66, 67, 75, 8c 82. NEANDER'S CHURCH HISTORY. Carefully revised by llic Rv.v. A. J. \V. .MoruisO.n. 6 Vols, bee 136, 187. 54. NEANDER'S LIFE OF CHRIST. 67, 64. NEANDER'S PLANTING OF CHRISTIANITY, & ANTIGNOSTIKUS, 2 Vols. 59. GREGORYS (DR.) LETTERS ON THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION. 62 8c 63. JAMES' (G. P. R.) LOUIS XIV. Complete in 2 Vols. ^Portraits. 68 &. 70. SIR JOSHUA REYNOLDS' LITERARY WORKS, with Memoir, 2 Vols. Port. 69. ANDREW FULLER'S PRINCIPAL WORKS. Portrait. 72. BUTLER'S ANALOGY OF RELIGION, AND SERMONS, with Notes fee. Fonruit. 73. MISS BREMER'S WORKS. Translated by Maict IIowitt. New Edition, revised. Vol. I. [" The Neighbours," and olJiftr Tales.] Post 8vo. Portrait, os. 6d. 74. NEANDER'S MEMORIALS OF CHRISTIAN LIFE IN THE EARLY AND MIDDLE AGES (ineludiiiij liis ''Lighc tu D.irk I'iaees"). Post Svo. 3i. Gii. 76. MISS BREMER'S WORKS, by MARY HOWITT. Vol. n. "The President's Diiu^^liters." Portrait. 77 8c 80. JOHN FOSTER'S LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE, edited by J. E. Kylanu. la 2 ^'oiullles. Portrait. 78. BACON'S ESSAYS. APOPHTHEGMS, WISDOM OF THE ANCIENTS, NEW ATALANTIS, AND HENRY VII., with Dissertation and Notes. Portrait. 79. GUIZOT'S HISTORY OF REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT, translated iVoiu the French by A. R. .Scoblk. With Index. 83. MISS BREMER'S WORKS, by Maky IIowitt. Vol. III. "The Home, and Mi ;l'e and Peace." S4. DE LOLME ON THE CONSTITUTION OF ENGLAND, or, Account of the J-^ii^hi!i Government; ediieti, with Life and Notes, by JouN Macgekgor, M.P, 85. HISTORY OF THE HOUSE OF AUSTRIA, from 1792 to the present time; in continuation of COXE. Furlrait of the presejit Emperor. 87 8c 88. FOSTER'S LECTURES, edited by J. E. Ryland. 2 vols. 89- MISS BREMER'S WORKS, I-y MARY IIOWITT, Vol IV. "A Diary: The II laniily; Tiie ^oiitary; The Comforter; Axel and Anna ; and a Letter about Su-jipers." 90. SMITH'S fAOAM^ THEORY OF MORAL SENTIMENTS: and " Essaj on tlie First roriuati'.ii of Lanirua-cs," wiiii Memoir by Dl'gald Sxkwart. 91, 95, 96, 99. 102, 103. 105, 8c 105. COWPER'S COMPLETE WORKS, Edited iiy South KY; comjirisin'z his Poems, Correspondence, and Translations, with bouthey's Memoir. If'ith hi) Engrarlnfjx on Steel. Complete in 8 vols. 3 0 WiH fx^ BJHN'S STANDARD LIBRARY. 92 DAN'.JBIA?^ PROVINCES — Rankk's History of Servia, Servian Revolution Insurrection in Bosnia, and The Slave Provinces of Turkey. Trans, by Mks. Kker 93 GOETHE'S ELECTIVE AFFINITIES, SORROWS OF WERTHER, GERMAN EMIGRANTS, GOOD WOMEN; and A NOUVELETTE, . . 94. THE CARAFAS OF MADDALONI; Naples under Spanish Dominion. Trans- lated from the German of ALfHEO i)£ E.0U1I0KT. Portrait of Masadidlo. 97, 109. & 112. CONDES HISTORY OF THE ARABS IN SPAIN. Translated from ihe Spanish bv JIes. Foster. In 3 vols, with copious Inde.x. Frontispiece. 98 &. 104-. LOCKE'S PHILOSOPHICAL WORKS, containing the Essay on the Human Understanding, the Conduct of tiie Understanding, &c., with ^otes by J. A. St. John, Esq. "General Index and a Portrait. In 2 vols. ICO. HUNGARY: ITS HISTORY AND REVOLUTIONS. With a Copious Memoir of Kossuth, from new and authentic sources. Portrait of Kossuth. 101 & 113. HISTORY OF RUSSIA to the present time, compiled from Karamstn , TooKE, and SKOun, by W. K. Kelly. In 2 vols, with Index, Portraits of Catherine the Second, Nicholas, and Mentschikopf. 107 &. 108. JAMESS (G. P. R.) LIFE OF RICHARD CCEUR DE LION. Portraits of Richard and Philip Augustus. Complete in 2 vols. 110 & ni. SMYTHS LECTURES ON MODERN HISTORY. New Edition, with the Author's last corrections, and a General Index. 2 vols. 114. GOETHES WILHELM MEISTERS APPRENTICESHIP. Complete. 115. BEAUMONT AND FLETCHER, in a popular form, by Leigh Hunt. 116. 117. SMYTH'S LECTURES ON THE HISTORY OF THE FRENCH REVO- LUTION. New edition, with the Author's last corrections, an additional Lecture and a General Index. Complete in 2 vols. 118. MIGNETS HISTORY OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION, from 1789 to ISll. 119. GUIZOTS HISTORY OF THE ENGLISH REVOLUTION OF 1640- ■\Vith a Preliminarv Essay on its causes and success. Translated by W. Hazlitt. 120. 121, &, 122. GUIZOT'S HISTORY OF CIVILIZATION, from the Fall of the Eomriii Empire to the Frencli Revolution. Translated by \V. Hazlitx. In 3 vols. "With Index, and Portraits of 31. Giiizot, Charlemagne, and Louis IK. 123 & 124. THIERRY'S HISTORY OF THE CONQUEST OF ENGLAND BY THE NORMANS. Translated by W. Hazlitt. In 2 vols. Portraits. 125 & 126. FOSTER'S CRITICAL ESSAYS. Edited by J. E. Ryi.ANU. lu 2 vols. 127. LUTHER'S TA8LE-TALK; With Life by A. Chalmers. Portrait. 128, 129, 130 & 131. LAMARTINES HISTORY OF THE RESTORATION. 4 vols, post 8vo., nev,' Edition, with a General Index, and 5 additional Portraits, viz., Lamartine, Tallevraud, Lafayette, Nov, and Louis XVII. Cloth. CARRELS COUNTER-REVOLUTION'iN ENGLAND— FOXS HISTORY of JAMES II.— .\iid LORD LONSDALE'S MEMOIR OF JAMES IL Portraits. STURM'S MORNING COMMUNINGS WITH GOD, or Devotional Medita- tions for Every Day in the Year. FOSTERIANA: THOUGHTS, REFLECTIONS, and CRITICISMS of the late ':>\Y/' (rS?^ JOHN FOSTER, (Author of Essays of Decision of Character, Popular Ignorance, AV\'-^"^Afeg SiC), selected from pcriudical papers not hitherto pubhshed in a collective form, ;->v>^_!J^'2^ and edited by Henry G. Bohn. (Nearly GUU pages). 5j. r'ACrf^ LIFE AND LETTERS OF JOHN LOCKE; with Extracts from his Letters and --'^.i/l-iT^ Common-Place P>ook3, by Lord King. New Edition, with general Index. '^ ''r;^^^ 136 & 137. NEANDER'S CHURCH HISTORY, translated from the German. j^'/z-y^'^o^ V^ol. IX., which completes the work. With a general Index to the nine volumes. s~'\-'\\N^ In two parts, 3*. dd. each. %\'.0.^ 138 & 139. NEANDER'S HISTORY OF CHRISTIAN DOGMAS. Translated from -'i'i<^\'f-yf^y^ the German, by J. E. Rvland. Complete in 2 vols. '-^y')^^:^'^ 140. THIERRY'S HISTORY OF THE TIERS ETAT, or Third Estate, in France. ^^'-^''<■XB3 2vols.ini. \}S. -yy/^>'^^c->-^' ''l'<-N':i^-r>' (Kr>i UNIFORM WITH THE STANDARD LIBRARY. ^-M;(^^ EOHfJ'S eeJE^IT^FlS LIBKAEY. Ci'form tc'ith the Sxandaud Libkakt, jpr'ice Is., excepting those marked olkenctne. 1. STAUNTCNS CHESS PLAYER'S HAfW-BOOK. tcUh Dh^pranii. 2. LECTURES ON PAINTING, I'v THE KOYAL ACADLMiClANS. 3 4 0, & 15. HUMBOLDTS COSMOS; or, Sketch of a riiysical description of ' 'tiu^ Universe, 'rraiislatcd, witli Noics, by K. C. Ottk. In 4 Vols., u-ith fiuf, I'orlmit. I'liis TnuisiHtiou (ihouifli published at so low a price) is more complete tliuu any other. The Notes are placed l)eneat!i the text. Humboldt's uuulytical suiiiiDj'.rics, iitid the passages hit 'icrto suppressed, are iucludcd; and comprehensive Indices subjoined. Zs. C)d. per Volume. ]ii'<^jS 5. STAUNTONb CHESS PLAYERS COMPANION, comjirisiiig a New Treatise on '|V'-'^S OJds, a Collection ol' Match Games, OriL,Mual rioblems, kc. -^K^ 6, HAND-BOOK OF GAMES, by VARIOUS AMATEURS and PROFESSORS. VVnW^ 7. HUW130LDTS VIEWS OF HATURE, tcUi coloured riew of Ckhnburazo, ^c. ^f^i'^^^ 9. RICHARDSONS GEOLOGY. AND PAL/EONTOLOGY, Revised by Dr. Weight, iv''-/<^ t';i//j uinvardi of 4l)t) UlmtrnLvjus on I>'ood. '''-'S^^ 10. STOCKHARDTS PRINCIPLES OF CHEMISTRY, E.xemplified in Simple Expc- ^'jV^-/^ ' I'inicuts, icilu up'vards of i'.O ilh.ixiraliuns. ^4"'^ 11. DR. G. A. ryiANTELUS PETRIFACTIONS AND THEIR TEACHINGS; A 'iV''*^^ Hand-Book to the Fossils in the British Museum. Ueantijul Wood hii'jrnriiujx. 6j. ''kS^ 12. AGASSIZ AND GOULDS COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, New and Enlm-ea rVv^>^ lOdition, icilh nearly 41)0 Hhi.slnUions. VVsV^ 13, 19. & 28. HUMBOLDTS PERSONAL NARRATIVE OF HIS TRAVELS IN 7x!5-'.S^ AMERICA. Vvith General Index. ',v,%>^ 1i. PYE SMITHS GEOLOGY AND SCRIPTURE. Fiilh Edition, with Memoir. V'(^ 1« OERSTEDS SOUL IN NATURE, &.c. I'orlruit. "fV-WsS 17. STAUNTON S CHESS TOURNAMENT, vsilh Di'iorams. JjV^'^ 18 & 20. BRIDGEWATER TREATISES. Kikby on the History, Habits, and ■^'kv^ Insiiiicts of Animals; Edited liv T. KviiJER Jonks. In 2 Vols. Many IHiijstra/ion.':. ,'Yi,K'^ 21. BRIDGEY/ATER TREATISES. Kidd On the Adaptation of E.\tfcrnal Vvv^>@ Nature to the riivsical Condition of Man. Is. Gd. Iv'^^ 22. BRIDGEWATER TREATISES. Whkwem.'s Astronomy and General Pliysics, ' > ^i«M^ considered wi
  • ^ Ss9 f->>jjd FROM THE MINERAL KINGDOM, Translated by A. ne.i,,Kr.i, r.n .-., oce. t>SAM-\-> 24. BRIDGEWATER TREATISES. Cii.M.Mr.Rs on the Adaptation of p:.xterna. (dlo,x''AN/; Nature to the .Moral and Intcilcctual Constitution of Man, wiljli the Author's last ^^-A'/q Corrections, and ]?io<:rap!iical Skcleh bv the Rkv. 1);:. Gumming. fe^'!oN/-^^"~' 25. BACONS NOVUM ORGANUM AND ADVANCEMENT OF LEiARNING. ^tS^ViV'^'! Com;)lcte, with Notes, bv J. Dkvkt, M.A. ^VSo''''' j''/^' 26 &i 27. HUMPHREYS COIN COLLECTOR'S MANUAL: a popular tiitroduction sS'^.vr-<7; to llie Study of Coins, ancient and modern; with cl.-iburale Hide.ves, and numeroua h'i(ihly-fini.^hed Engracinos on Wood and Steel, 2 Vols. 29. COMTES PHILOSOPHY OF THE SCIENCES, Edited from the 'Cours de I'hilosophie I'ositive.' br G. H. Lkwks, Esq. 30. MANTELLS (Dk.) GEOLOGICAL EXCURSfONS. inchidit.-r THE ISLE OF WIGHT. New Edition, bv T. Rlpkrt Jonks. Wohlcnts and llap. 31. HUNTS POETRY OF SCIENCE; or, Studies of the Physical Phenomena of Nature. Third Edition, revised and enlarged. 32 6l 33. ENNEMOSERS HISTORY OF MAGIC. Translated from the German by Wii.MAM HowiTT. With an Ap|)cndi.\ bv .Mary Howrir. In 2 Vols. 34. HUNTS ELEMENTARY PHYSICS- Ni'.merons Woodcuts. 35. HANDBOOK OF DOMESTIC MEDICI NE, bv an eminent Physician (700 pages). 36. STANLEY S CLASSIFIED SYNOPSIS of Dutch, riemish, ami German Painters. R ^ wmmmmm^. i^/:^^JVv^/Cs^^^7^c^>7S::-''^^T^r. c7-^>jC;-^<;^',S>7>^^ C$Qii^ BOHN'S SCIENTIFIC LIBEARY, ^iy^K m 37. BRIDGEWATER' TREATISES. Prout on Cliemistrv, Meterology, and th« s>;?» J-unctiou of Diijestimi. Kdited bv Dr. GRiryiTHs. Coloured Maps. >i^ 38. JOYCE'S SCIENTIFIC DIALOGUES- ^ew and Enlarged Edition, completed J^o in the present stutc of tiiowlcdiie !>▼ i)u. Griffiths. JS'umerotis If'uodcuts. ^ 39. STOCKHARDTS AGRICULTURAL CHEMISTRY: or, CHEMICAL FIELD S.^ LECTURES. Addreased to Farmeis. Witli Notes by pKOfJissou llESFRiiY and sg a Piiperon IdQUli) MANURK, l)v.I.J. .Mkchi, Esq. >55 40. BLAIRS CHRONOLOGICAL TABLES, rkvisku and exlakgkd ; compre- s^ kending tlie ClironoloKj and Histurv of ilie World to 1856. Hv J. W. KosaE, K^ (npwards of SOU pagesj. Double voiuaie, lO^.— or half morocco, 12*. M. 41. BOLLEYS MANUAL OF TECHNICAL ANALYSIS; a Guide for the Testisgof Natural and ArtiticiiU Subsitaucus, liv ]{. IL Paul. 100 Wood Ei^-gravings. 42afc47. MANTELLS WONDERS OF GEOLOGY; 7tli edit, revised by T. Rupekt JoNKs. Ciiloured Gi^olo^ical Map of Eu'^laiid; :2()U wood-cuts. 2 vols. ?*• Gi^- each, 43 Si- 46. CARPENTER'S ZOOLOGY; rcviied :vud cointjleted to tlie present lime. !'3^ 2 vo!^., (iiea.'lv 6 ii) pa.;es eacli^, Gv. e;ich. With manv hundred Wood Hni;raviny:3. :? 44 CARPENTcftS MECHANICAL PHILOSOPHY, ASTRONOMY &- HOROLOGY. ■ .J With ISl Illustrations. 4<3 '\o 2i 53. INDEX OF DATES, coniprcliending the principal Tacts in the Chronology and ;^>^ History of Mie World, from tiie earliest to the pres-ent lime. By J. W. Kossb. 2^ two" parts, forming one very thick volume, V^s ; or half morocco, 12.?. 6,/. ^^ 43 ot 49. MANTELL'S MEDALS" OF CREATION; or, First Lessons in Geology 'y>^ and in ihe Siudy ol <)r>:anic iteiuMius. 2 thick vols. Second edition, extensively ^? revised, v.ith scver;d iuuidred wood-cuts of fossil Remains. The £. vols, l.^j. ^^ 50. HUMBOLDT'S COSMOS. Vol. V. Terrestrial Phenomena, Volcanoes, Earth- 'M, -iUiikes, Springs, &c. w. -2^ 51. CARPENTtR'3 VEGETABLE PHYS'OLOGY AND SYSTErJJATIC BOTANY. ^ Is'ew edition, careiuUv revised. 217 Wood Ens-ravines. Ca. /^ 6.Q.. OE .JUSSiEU'5 ELCMENTS OF BOTANy/ By Jr H- Wir.sox. 750 wood cuti '^>^ 63. CHEVREUL ON. COLOUR ; its Harmony, Contrast and Application. ]Jy Chahles °$^ Maetki,. (t'he only editioii wiiich gives the entire work). Plates, uj. 4>^ Or, with the addition of IG. coloured pUites, 'ts. 6d. 1 BOHH'S SimSTSATED LIBRARY. ;i Vuifc-rM wUh the SfA.\D.\.UD Libkarv, at n,^. j.er rohime. •^:5 '1 to 8. LODGES PORTRAITS OF ILLUSTRIOUS PERSONAGES OF GREAT HIUTAIN. S Vuls.,j)ost 8vo. imtoitmUs. 9. CRUrKSH-^WKS THREE COURSES AND DESSERT, with bQ lib, st rations. 10- PiCKE.TiNQ.3 RACES OF MAN. With numerous i'oWrm/A-, (or coloured 7.?. 6(/.) n, KITTOS SJ-RiPTURE LANDS, AND BIBLICAL ATLAS, with 24 Map.i, hs Coluureil, 'Is. 6.1. 12. WHITE'S SELBORNE, hy Sir William Jaroink and E.Jesse. AOJiue If'oo. Eaprtn-i'i'js, "■?. Or, coloured, 7-'- 64/. 13. DIDRON'S' CHRISTIAN ICONOGRAPHY. With 150 EngravinfiK Vol. T. 14. REDDING O-N VViNES. New and Revised Ivliiiou, wi^A 2n «r«/(/(/'Ki /V«0(.'rw/.j, 15 &, IQ. ALLEN'S BATTLES OF THE BRITISH NAVY. New Editiou. Enlarged liV the Aulhor. Ni'inerov.s tine t'urtriiUs on Steel. 2 Vols. 17 & IS. ROME iN THE NKNETTEENTH CENTURY. Eiflh Edition, in 2 Vols, vnlh :U iiii'^ Sterl /■Jur/rai'-ui/.s. and hide.'C. 19. LAAXSVELLS VICTORIES OF WELLINGTON AND THE BRITISH ARMIES, /^V7X'~-43 wilfi t'li'/niviin/s (jh S/.-el. iY^,;>.:;f, 20. LIFE OF WELLINGTON, by " .A.v Or.n Soi.dik.r," com])ilcd from the materials of "JC-C/^rvt Maxwell; with an Account" of the Fimend. IS kiffhly -finished stefil Kngrumnc^S' 'vVfi^ 21. MARY AND WM. HO WITT'S STORIES OF ENGLISH AND FOREIGN LIFE, A'v'o^tS 22, EECHSTEIN'S CAGE and CHAMBER BIRDS, including Swiokt's Warblers. Vii'^v-C^* ^\yix Kdiliuii, "jrreailv enlanrcd, nimicrot's I'latcs (or Culovred, '!s. Cid.) "'.'^■(^^ 23. NORWAY AND ITS SCENERY, comprism- IMuck's Journal, with larire .Addi- :V,,j;'w^:? timis and a 15'ad Hook. Kdiied by Thos. Forkstke, Esq. U'Uk 22 iilitsi'^ilioju, ^^V^/^^X^ bcauti/'ulltf .liiiyfacfd on SUel h'j Litca.i. A/V\.^^ •»* The Koad liook is uold separately, prica 2». BOHNS ILLUSTRATED LIBKARY. oT^CHINA: pictorial, descriptive, and historical, Nvith some account of 'iva and the Burmese, Siam and Assuia. llluslrattd by 100 IFood Enqravinfjs. 25. pictorial handbook OF LONDON, ^f'it-h 205 Engvavlnjs add large Map. CALENDAR OF THE SEASONS. 35. 36. 37. f^2 38, PICTORIAl 26. MARY HOWITT'S PICTORIAL Upwards of 100 lUitstrations. 27. DANTE, translated into English Verse by I. C. Weight, M.A. Tliird Edition, carefully revised. Portrait, aud 34 Illustrations on Steel, after Flaxman. 28 & 29. MUDIE'S BRITISH BIRDS- 2 Vols., with biff/nres of Birds, and 7 of Eggs. (Or, Kith the Plates Coloured, "is. &d. per Vol.) 30 ■'"ASSO'S JERUSALEM DELIVERED, translated into English Verse, by J. H. WiFfKX. 4l1i Edition. 21 Engravings on Wood, and S on Steel. 31. INDIA: PICTORIAL, DESCRIPTIVE, AND HISTORICAL, fiom the Earliest Times to the I'resejit. IJap and npicards of 100 Engravings on Wood. 32. NICOLINIS HISTORY OF THE JESUITS. Portraits o/ Loyola, Luinez, Xavier, Borgia, Acquaviva, Pere la Chaise, Ricci, and Pope Ganganelli. 33. ROBINSON CRUSOE, with lUustratious by Stotuakd and Haevby, 12 heaiUifid Engravings on Steed, and 74 on Wood. 34. WALKER'S MANLY EXERCISES; containing Skating, Riding, Driving, Shooting, Sailing, Rowing, Swimuiinu'-, &.c. Tenth Edition, revised, with numerous Plates. MILLERS HISTORY 0F''THE ANGLO-SAXONS, on the basis of Shakon Tlkner. Portrait of Alfred, Man, and 12 Engravings on Steel alter liarvey. MICHAEL ANGELO AND RAPHAEL. By Duppa and Quatekmeke be QuiNCY. 'With l:i hi^hly-tinished Engravings, including the Cartoons. WALTON'S COMPLETE ANGLER j with J."otes, practical and historical. Edited by Ej). Jesse and Henry G. Bohn. Embellished with 203 Engravings on Wood, price ay.; — or with the addiiiou of 26 Engravings on Steel, 7^. 6^/. MARRYAT'3 MASTERMAN READY; with 93 Engravings on Wood. 39. TALES OF THE GEN 1 1. With numerous Wood cut* and 12 Steel Engi^avings. 40. GUIDE TO THE KNOWLEDGE OF POTTERY AND PORCELAIN; com- prising thfe Beknal Catalogue, with Prices and Names; an Introductory Essay, and a List of all the known Marks and Monograms. By H. G. Bohn. 41. THE LIFE OF ALEXANDER POPE, including many of his Letters. By Robeet Carkuthees. Revised and co^lsiderably enlarged ; numtrous Wood Engravings. %2. POPE'S HOMER'S ILIAD. With Eiaxniau's Designs, and Introduction and ^'otes, bv the Rev. J. S. Watson, M..\. 43. BONOMI'S NINEVEH AND ITS PALACES- New Edition, including an Account of the Assvrian Sciilptuies recentlv added to the British Museum. 300 Engravings. POPE'S HOMERS ODYSSEY. ^\"ith the Battle of Frogs and Mice, Hymns, Sec, by other Translators, including Chapman. With Flaxman's Designs. Sc 50. POPE'S POETICAL WORKS, edited by Robkrt Caeeuthees. New Edition, revised. With numerous Ens:raviii2s on Wood. In 2 volumes. STUART AND REVETTS ATHENS and other MONUMENTS OF GREECE. 71 Plates and numerous Woodcut Capitals. To wliicli is added a Glossary. 47- LINDSAY'S (LORD) LETTERS ON EGYPT AND THE HOLY LAND. Fifth Edition, with additions, and 30 Wood Engravings and Maps. & 52. ARIOSTO'S ORLANDO FURIOSO, in English Verse, by W. S. Rose. With Portra t and 12 tine Euirravinsrs on Steel. Complete in 2 v.ils. KRUMMACHER'S PARABLES. ■lO Illustrations bv Clayton and Dalziel. LEIGH HUNTS BOOK FOR A CORNER, 80 VVood Kngraviugs. HOLBEIN'S DANCE OF DEATH, AND BIBLE CUTS; upwards of 150 sub- jects beautifully engraved on wood ia facsimile. With Descriptions by Eeancis Douce, F.S. A., and 'Thomas Feognall Dibdin. 2 vols, in 1. '~,s. (id. JESSE'S ANECDOTES OF DOGS, with Additions and Woodcuts 55— Or, with the addition of 34 steel Fitgravnii^s, 7^. 6./. 55. STARLING'S (MISS) NOBLE DEEDS OF WOMAN. U steel Engravings. 56. BUTLER'S HUDIBRAS, witii variorum notes. Edited by Heney G. Bohn. SO woodcuts, 5.J.— Or, with G2 Portraits. Bound in 2 vol*. 105. 57. THE YOUNG SPORTSMAN'S MANUAL; OR RECREATIONS IN SHOOTING. Jiy Ceaven. With 62 Illustrations on Wood, and Uou Steel. 58. PETRARCH'S SONNETS, TRIUMPHS, and other POEMS. With a Life by Thomas CAiirBKiL. IG Engravings on steel. 59. THE YOUNG LADY'S BOOK: a Manual of Elegant Recreations, Arts, Sciences, and .Vcconiplishinents, completed to the present time, and edited by distinguished Professors. With 1200 woodculs, and several fine entiravings on steel, fs. (id. 6J^>/'~.;s< 60. PARIS AND ITS ENVIRONS, including Vcr-siilles, St, Cloud, and the Champagne %I>(V''-' Districts. By TuujiAS Fouestku. With 2S engravings on steel. S^}^^'^' 44. 45 46. 48 54. JE$ BOHN'S ANTIQUARIAN LIBRARY. BEDE'S ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY, THE ANGLO-SAXON CHRONICLE. u. Dvjreni* Kj-.)p:iHTKl WlXCWVllMa- VENERABLE BEDE'S ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY OF ENGLAND. ALSO THE AI^GLO-SAXON CHRONICLE. ILLUSTRATIVE NOTES, A MAP OF ANGLO-SAXON ENGLAND, AND A GENERAL INDEX. EDITED BY J. A. GILES, D.C.L., LATE FELLOW OF CORPUS CHEISTI COLLEGE, OXFORD. THIRD EDITION. LONDON: HENRY G. BOHN, YORK STREET, COVENT GARDEN. M.DCCC.LIX. LONDON : J. HADDOX, PRINTER, 3, BOUVERIE STREET, FLEET STREET. PREFACE. CHAP. I.— INTRODUCTION. The period of six hundi-ed years (from about a.d. 466 to 1066), during which the Anglo-Saxons were dominant in England, has always been viewed with much interest and attention by the modern English, particularly of our own day. Nor are we at a loss to discover the true explanation of this fact. A nation will always be most attached to that portion of its former history which developes a state of things, polity, and institutions, similar to their own, and adapted to become a model for their imitation. Now the tendency of the present times is to enlarge the rights and privileges of the people, that they may — all, and not merely a section of them — enjoy as much happiness in their social life and during their existence on the earth, as the constitution of their nature requires ; and, moreover, that they shall, as a body, have the privilege of judging for themselves in what way the largest share of enjoyment may be obtained. Hence has arisen that renewal of attention which the people of England at present devote to that part of English history which preceded the Norman conquest. Then are supposed to have been planted those seeds of national liberty which, under every form of cutting and pruning to which the plant may occasionally have been subjected, have nevertheless con- tinually germinated, until the tree, like that which sprang from the grain of mustard -seed, bids fair to overshadow all of us. To Such a spirit of inquiry must be attributed the fact that the Anglo-Saxon Ecclesiastical History by the Venerable Bede, has already, before the appearance of this volume, been pubhshed in three separate editions in about seven years ; and to the same cause must be ascribed the publication of this volume, in which, at an unprecedented low price, are now for the first time presented to the public the two great VI PREFACE. Chronicles of Anglo-Saxon History. Although of limited dimensions, they present us with a most extraordinary num- ber of facts arranged chronologically, and form a mass of liistory such as no other nation of Europe possesses. CHAP. II.— LIFE OF BEDE. Sect. I.— Of his birth. The year of our Lord 673, remarkable for one of the most important of our early English councils, held at Hertford, for the purpose of enforcing certain general regulations of the church, has an equal claim on our attention, as the year in which that great teacher of religion, literature, and science, the Venerable Bede, first saw the light. The time of his birth has, however, been placed by some writers as late as a.d. 677, but this error arose from not per- ceiving that the last two or three pages of liis Chronological Epitome, attached to the Ecclesiastical History, were added by anotlier hand.* Bede's own words appear decisive in fixing the date of his birth ; — " This is the present state of Britain, about 285 years since the coming of the Saxons, and in the seven hun- dred and thirty-first year of our Lord's incarnation." To this he subjoins a short chronology which comes down to 731, and was continued to 734, either by another hand or by Bede himself, at a later period just before his death : he then gives a short account of the principal events of his own life, and says, that he has attained (attigisse) the fifty-ninth year of liis Hfe. Gehle, in his recent publication on the life of Bede, has not scrupled to fix the year 672, interpreting Bede's expression that he had attained liis fifty-ninth year as implying that he was entering on his sixtieth. On the other hand, another learned critic,f whose opinion has been adopted by Stevenson in his Litroduction [p. 7], has endeavoured to show that 674 is the true date. But in so unimportant a particular it is hardly worth while to weigh the conflicting opinions, and the intermediate date, so long ago settled by • Mabill. in v. Bed. sect. ii. Sim. Dun. de Ecc. D. 8, and Ep. de Archie. Ebor. Stubbs's Act. Pont. Eborac. Sparke's Hist. Ang. Scrip. 1723. Surtces' Hist, of Durham, ii. p. QQ. t Pagi Critic, in Baron. Ann. a.d. 693, sect. 8. LIFE OF BEDE. Vll Mabillon, and apparently so well borne out by Bede's own words, is perhaps the best that can be adopted. It is always to be regretted, when little is known of the early life of eminent men, as in all cases where many facts have been handed down concerning the years of their youth, something or other has invariably broken forth significant of their future life and fortunes. So very little, however, is known of this great ornament of England and father of the universal church, that, except his own writings, the letter of Cuthbert his disciple, and one or two other almost contempo- rary records, we have no means whatever of tracing his pri- vate history. The place of his birth is said by Bede himself to have been in the ten-itory afterwards belonging to the twin-mon- asteries of St. Peter and St. Paul, at Wearmouth and Jar- row. The whole of this territory, lying along the coast near the mouths of the rivers Tyne and Wear, was granted to abbat Benedict by king Egfrid two years after the birth of Bede. William of Malmesbury points out more minutely the spot where our author first saw the light. His words are these : " Britain, wliich some writers have called another world, because, from its lying at a distance, it has been over- looked by most geographers, contains in its remotest parts a place on the borders of Scotland, where Bede was born and educated. The whole country was formerly studded with monasteries, and beautiful cities founded therein by the Ro- mans ; but now, owing to the devastations of the Danes and Normans, it has notliing to allure the senses. Through it runs the Wear, a river of no mean width, and of tolerable rapidity. It flows into the sea, and receives ships, which are driven thither by the wind, into its tranquil bosom. A certain Benedict built two churches on its banks, and found- ed there two monasteries, named after St. Peter and St. Paul, and united together by the same rule and bond of brotherly love."* The birth of Bede happened in the third year of Egfrid, son of Oswy, the first of the kings of Northumber- land, after the union of the provinces Deira and Bernicia into one monarchy. The dominions of this king extended from the Humber to the Frith of Forth, and compre- hended all the six northern counties of England, and the ♦ Hist, of the Kings of England, book i. chap, iii., p. 54. Vlll PREFACE. whole of the southern part of Scotland. The piety of Eg- frid induced him to grant the large tract of land above men- tioned to one Biscop, surnamed Benedict, who had formerly- been one of his thanes, but now became a monk, and built thereon a monastery, which he dedicated to St. Peter, on the north bank of the river Wear, and which from tliis circum- stance derived the name of Wearmouth. The same pious abbat, eight years after [a.d. 682], built another monastic estabUshment, which he dedicated to St. Paul, at Jarrow, on the banks of the Tyne, at the distance of about five miles from the former. In memory of this, the following inscrip- tion, which has been preserved, was carved on a tablet in the church at Jarrow : — Dedicatio Basilicas S. Pauli VIII Kal. Mail Anno XV Egfridi regis Ceolfridi Abb. ejusdemque Ecclesise Deo auctore Conditoris anno IV. The Dedication of the Church of Saint Paul, on the 24th of April in the fifteenth year of king Egfrid and in the fourth year of abbat Ceolfrid, who, under God, founded the same church. These two establishments were for many years ruled by Benedict himself, and his associates Ceolfrid, Easterwin, and Sigfrid, and from the unity and concord which prevailed between the two, deserved rather, as Bede expresses it, to be called "one single monastery built in two different places." * We cannot be certain as to the exact spot, but it is sufiici- ently near the mark to ascertain that Bede was bom in the neighbourhood of these two monasteries, and probably in the village of Jarrow. Of his parents nothing has been recorded. He tells us, in his own short narrative of himself, that he was placed, at the age of seven years, under the care of abbat Benedict, in the abbey of Wearmouth, that of Jarrow being not yet built. When, however, this second establishment was founded, Bede appears to have gone tliither under Ceolfrid • Leland. Antiq. de Reb. Brit. Coll. ed. Heame, iii. 42. LIFE OF BEDE. IX its first abbat, and to have resided there all the remainder of his life. Sect. 2. — Of his youth. For a youth of such studious habits and indefatigable in- dustry, no situation could have been more appropriate than that in which he was now placed. Benedict Biscop, the founder of the monasteries, was a man of extraordinary learning and singular piety. Though a nobleman by birth, he was unwearied in the pursuit of knowledge, and in ameli- orating the condition of his country. In order to accomplish his benevolent intentions, he travelled into other countries, and introduced not only foreign literature, but arts hitherto unknown, into our island. He was the first who brought masons and glaziers home with him, having need of their services in the noble buildings which he erected. He tra- velled four or five times to Rome, and became intimate with Pope Agatho. Here he was much captivated with the liturgy of the Roman church, and their manner of chanting, for until then the Galilean or Mozarabic liturgy was used both in Britain and Ireland, as is alluded to in Augustine's Questions to pope Gregory. Each time, on his return to England, Benedict carried back with him the most valuable books and costly relics and works of art which could be pro- cured for money. This collection, which was, by his orders, preserved with peculiar care, received considerable augment- ations from the zeal and munificence of his successors. Bede's thirst for study was here, no doubt, satisfied : so large and valuable a library could scarcely have been within his reach elsewhere, even among the other Benedictines of the day, however well qualified that order was to encourage a taste for learning, and to provide means for gratifying that taste among its fosterUngs. In so large a community, too, as that of Wearmouth, there were doubtlessly many scholars of mature age, who would all assist in promoting the studies of so talented a youth as he who was now introduced within their walls. Bede was not, however, left to chance, or the untutored dictates of his own youthful fancy, to find his way as he could through the years spent in the rudiments of learning. In the study of theology and the Holy Scriptures, he received. XU PREFACE. This, however, no doubt happened after he took priest's orders in his thirtieth year, though the eleven years which intervened must have been sedulously spent in laying up that store of erudition which afterwards enabled him to shine forth to the world in every department of literature. For it does not appear that he published any thing in writing until after he had undergone the second of the church's ordinances. This we have from his own words, " From the time of my taking priest's orders, to the fifty-ninth year of my age, I have occupied myself in making these short extracts from the works of the venerable fathers for the use of me and mine, or in adding thereto somewhat of my own, after the model of their meaning and interpretation." If, however, he was admitted unusually early to the orders of deacon, he was in no mind, on the other hand, to rush hastily, or without long and patient study, into the full duty of the priest's office ; and thus he devoted eleven patient years to qualify himself for the various services which he was preparing to render to the literature of his country, and the interests of the church. Sect. 4. — Of his clerical and literary labours. The office of priest, or mass^priest, as he is called in king Alfred's Anglo-Saxon translation, brought Avith it a consider- able portion of duties which would not allow him to devote the whole of his time to his favourite occupations. His em- ployment was to say mass in the church, by which we are to understand that he officiated at the various masses which were performed at different hours in the day, besides perhaps assisting in the morning and evening prayers of the monas- tery. The following extracts from Anglo-Saxon writers, quoted by Sharon Turner, will well describe the responsible functions which were supposed to belong to the priest's office. " Priests ! you ought to be well provided with books and apparel as suits your condition. The mass-priest should at least have his missal, his singing-book, his reading-book, his psalter, his hand-book, his penitential, and his numeral one. He ought to have his officiating garments, and to sing from sun-rise, with the nine intervals and nine readings. His sacramental cup should b© of gold or silver, glass or tin, and LIFE OF BEDE. Xlll not of earth, at least not of wood. The altar should be always clean, well clothed, and not defiled with dirt. There should be no mass without wine. " Take care that you be better and wiser in your spiritual craft than worldly men are in theirs, that you may be fit teachers of true wisdom. The priest should preach rightly the true belief ; read fit discourses ; visit the sick ; and baptize infants, and give the unction when desired. No one should be a covetous trader, nor a plunderer, nor drunk often in wine-houses, nor be proud or boastful, nor wear osten- tatious girdles, nor be adorned with gold, but to do honour to himself by his good morals. "They should not be litigious nor quarrelsome, nor seditious, but should pacify the contending ; nor carry arms, nor go to any fight, though some say that priests should carry weapons when necessity requires ; yet the servant of God ought not to go to any war or military exercise. Neither a wife nor a battle becomes them, if they will rightly obey God and keep his laws as becomes their state."* Their duties are also described in the Canons of Edgar in the following terms : — "They are forbidden to carry any controversy among themselves to a lay-tribunal. Their own companions were to settle it, or the bishop was to determine it. "No priest was to forsake the church to which he was consecrated, nor to intermeddle with the rights of others, nor to take the scholar of another. He was to learn sedulously his own handicraft, and not put another to shame for his ignorance, but to teach him better. The high-born were not to despise the less-born, nor any to be unrighteous or covetous dealers. He was to baptize whenever required, and to abolish all heathenism and witchcraft. They were to take care of their churches, and apply exclusively to their sacred duties ; and not to indulge in idle speech, or idle deeds, or excessive drinking ; nor to let dogs come within their church-inclosure, nor more swine than a man might govern. " They were to celebrate mass only in churches, and on the altar, unless in cases of extreme sickness. They were * Elfric, in Wilkins's Leges Anglo-Saxon. 169 — 171» XIV PREFACE. to have at mass their corporalis garment, and the subucula under their alba ; and all their officiating garments were to be woven. Each was to have a good and right book. No one was to celebrate mass, unless fasting, and unless he had one to make responses ; nor more than three times a day ; nor unless he had, for the eucharist, pure bread, wine and water. The cup was to be of something molten, not of wood. No woman was to come near the altar during mass. The bell was to be rung at the proper time. " They were to preach every Sunday to the people ; and always to give good examples. They were ordered to teach youth with care, and to draw them to some craft. They were to distribute alms, and urge the people to give them, and to sing the psalms during the distribution, and to exhort the poor to intercede for the donors. They were forbidden to swear, and were to avoid ordeals. They were to recom- mend confession, penitence, and compensation ; to administer the sacrament to the sick, and to anoint him if he desired it ; and the priest was always to keep oil ready for this purpose and for baptism. He was neither to hunt, or hawk, or dice ; but to play with his book as became his condition." * But the duties pointed out in these extracts do not seem to have satisfied the Venerable Bede ; he applied himself to every branch of literature and science then known, and besides study, and writing comments on the Scriptures, he treated on several subjects, on liistory, astrology, ortho- graphy, rhetoric, and poetry ; in the latter of which he was not inferior to other poets of that age, as appears by what he has left us on the Ufe of St. Cuthbert, and some verses in his Kcclesiastical History ; he wrote likewise two books of the Art of Poetry, which are not now extant ; a book of Hymns, and another of Epigrams. Bede's own writings inform us of the names of some of his literary friends ; among whom were Eusebius or Huetbert, to whom he inscribed his book, De Ratione Temporum, and his Interpretation on the Apoca- lypse, and who was afterwards abbat of Wearmouth : Cuthbert, called likewise Antonius, to whom he inscribed his book, De Arte Metrica, and who succeeded Huetbert, and was afterwards abbat of Jarrow ; he wrote of his master's death, but of this hereafter : also Constantino, to whom he * Wilkins's Leges Anglo-Saxonicae, 85—87. LIFE OF BEDE. XT inscribed Ms book, De Divisione Numerorum ; and Notbelm, then priest at London, and afterwards archbishop of Canter- bury, to whom he wrote his Questions on the Books of Kings ; to which we may add several in other monasteries ; wliilst others have improperly classed amongst them Alcuinus, afterwards preceptor to Charles the Great. Thus was the time of that excellent man employed in doing good to mankind, seldom or never moving beyond the limits of his own monastery, and yet in the dark cloister of it surveying the whole world, and dispensing to it the gifts entrusted to him ; it seems not a httle surprising, that one who had scarcely moved away from the place of his nativity, should so accurately describe those at a distance ; and this quality in his writings, when considered with reference to the age in which he Uved, is the more remarkable, as there is but one other recorded in history who possessed it in equal perfection, — the immortal Homer. Sect. 5. — Of his supposed journey to Rome. The peaceful tenor of Bede's monastic Hfe was apparently uninterrupted by absence or travel, and his own words might be thought to afford sufficient authority for the sup- position. A controversy, hoAvever, on this subject has arisen from a letter first published by William of Malmesbury, which to this hour has not been satisfactorily decided. This historian says that Bede's learning and attainments were so higlily esteemed, that pope Sergius wished to see him at Rome, and consult him on questions of importance and diffi- culty relating to the church. He accordingly quotes a letter, addressed by Sergius to abbat Ceolfrid, in which he is re- quested to send Bede without delay to Rome. Now it is argued, and apparently with truth, that Bede would not have dared to decline an invitation coming from so high a quarter; and yet it is all but certain that Bede never was out of England. He tells us distinctly that his whole life was spent in the neighbourhood of Jarrow ; and that the letters, which he has iuGerted in his Ecclesiastical History, had been procured for him at Rome by Nothelm, which would certainly lead us to infer that Bede tvas not there himself. Moreover, he tells us in his treatise, De Natura Rerum [46], that he was not with the monks of Yarrow, XVI PREFACE. who went to Rome in the year 701. It is therefore certain that Bede, if invited, never went to Rome ; and it is most probable, as has been stated by Gehle in his Latin Life of Bede, that the unexpected death of Pope Sergius, which happened shortly after, was the cause of his not undertaking the journey. Sect. 6. — Of his pretended residence at Cambridge. It has been also asserted, that Bede resided at the Univer- sity of Cambridge, and taught there in the office of Professor. This has been maintained by certain members of that Uni- versity, who have been eager to claim such an illustrious man as their own ; whilst other writers of the University of Oxford have been induced, by a corresponding jealousy, to deny the fact. The principal authority for this ill-supported statement is found in a volume called Liber Niger, preserved in the Uni- versity of Cambridge. Out of that book, Hearne, in the year 1719, published "Nicolai Cantalupi Historiola de Anti- quitate et Origine Universitatis Cantabrigiensis, simul cum Chronicis Sprotti Ox."* In this history Bede is said, "at the request of doctor Wilfred, and at the bidding of abbat Ceolfrid, to have left the territory belonging to the monastery of St. Peter and St. Paul, and being even then a monk in mind and regular discipline, though not in dress, to have gone, in the year 682, to Cambridge, where by sowing the seeds of knowledge for himself and others, by writing books and teaching the ignorant, he was of use before God and man in eradicating prevaiUng errors. It is hardly necessary to observe, that this is said to have happened at a time when Bede was little more than nine years old ! Seven years after he is stated to have had public honours conferred on him by the University, and at a later period to be still pursuing the duties of a teacher. In support of these statements a letter is produced, purporting to be addressed to the Students of the University * This work has been t\vice published in English, under the following titles, " History and Antiquities of the University of Cambridge, in two parts, by Richard Parker, B.D., and Fellow of Caius College, in 16'22. London, 1721 ; and again prmted for J. Marcus, in the Poultry, London," LIFE OF BEDE. XVU of Cambridge, by Alcuin, in which allusion is made to Bede as still alive, but Alcuin was fifty years later than Bede, and the supposed letter is consequently a forgery. Sect. 7. — Of his occasional visits to his friends. We may therefore infer without hesitation that Bede did not travel far from the monastery. This is both plainly asserted in his own account of his secluded life, and appears also from the want of any evidence to the contrary. Yet it is certain he made visits and excursions to other places ; nor can we suppose that he confined himself entirely within the monastery, and never indulged the pleasure of seeing and conversing with his friends. In his own letter to Egbert, archbishop of York, and nephew to king Ceolwulf, he alludes to a visit which he paid to that nobleman and prelate, and acknowledges an invitation to go there for the sake of conferring with him on their common pursuits in the year following. He was unable to comply with this request, in consequence of illness, and therefore communicated with his Friend by letter. In another letter, still extant, addressed to Wictred* on the celebration of Easter, he speaks of the kindness and affability with which he had been received by him Oil a former occasion. It is not improbable that he might sometimes likewise pay visits to the court ; for Ceolwulf, king of the Northumbrians, in one of whose provinces, i. e. Bernicia, Bede lived, was himself a man of singular learning, and a very great encourager of it in others ; and had, doubtlessly, an extraordinary respect for Bede, as appears by his request to him to write the Ecclesiastical History, and by Bede's submitting the papers to him for his perusal. That prince was not only a lover of learned men in general, but especially of that part of them who led a monastic life, insomuch tlaat, about three years after Bede's death, he resigned his crown, and became a monk at Lindisfarne. Sect. 8. — Of his death. The tranquillity of Bede's life, passed, as we have seen, entirely in the monastery of Jarrow, has left it a difficult task for his biographers to extend their accounts of him to * King of Kent. XVm PREFACE. that length which might seem suitable to his reputation and the value of his works. It has been truly remarked that scholars and persons of sedentary habits, though liable to frequent petty illnesses from want of bodily exercise and too great mental exertion, are nevertheless on the whole rather a long-lived race. This rule was not exempHfied in the case of Bede. He seems to have contracted at a somewhat early period a complaint in his stomach, accompanied with short- ness of breath : " So that," says Malmesbury, " he suffered in his stomach, and drew his breath with pains and sighs."* An attack of this disorder had lately prevented him from visiting his friend archbishop Egbert, and led to his writing him the valuable letter on the duties of a bishop, which we have still extant. We are not informed whether the dis- order left him at that time, and came on afresh, when it at last killed him ; but it is most probable that he enjoyed general ill health during the last few years of his existence. He was ill some weeks before he died, and was attended by Cuthbert, who had been one of his pupils, and after Huetbert became abbat of the monastery. The Christian piety with which he suffered the dispensation which awaited him, has been the universal theme of panegyric. The whole scene of his increasing malady, his devout resignation, and fervent prayers for all his friends, together with his paternal admo- nitions for the regulation of their lives, and his uncontrollable anxiety to dictate to the boy who was his amanuensis, even to his last moments, are so beautifully recorded in the letter of his pupil Cuthbert, that we shall not attempt here to describe it in other terms.*]" CUThbert's letter on the death of venerable bede. " To his fellow reader Cuthwin, beloved in Christ, Cuth- bert, his school-fellow ; health for ever in the Lord. I have received with much pleasure the small present which you sent me, and with much satisfaction read the letters of your devout erudition ; wherein I found that masses and holy • Hist, of the Kings of England, lib. i. c. 2. T See Simeon. Dunelm. de Ecc. Dun. ap. Twysdeni Scrip. X. I. 15, p. 8. Leland, Collect. Hearne, IV. iii. 77, Mabilloni Act. Bened. Sec. iii. LIFE OF BEDE. XIX prayers are diligently celebrated by you for our f\\tlier and master, Bede, whom God loved : this was what I principally desired, and therefore it is more pleasing, for the love of him (according to my capacity), in a few words to relate in what manner he departed this world, understanding that you also desire and ask the same. He was much troubled with short- ness of breath, yet without pain, before the day of our Lord's resurrection, that is, about a fortnight ; and thus he after- wards passed his life, cheerful and rejoicing, giving thanks to Almighty God every day and night, nay, every hour, till the day of our Lord's ascension, that is, the seventh before the kalends of June [twenty-sixth of May], and daily read lessons to us liis disciples, and whatever remained of the day, he spent in singing psalms ; he also passed all the night awake, in joy and thanksgiving, unless a short sleep pre- vented it ; in which case he no sooner awoke than he pre- sently repeated his wonted exercises, and ceased not to give thanks to God Avith uplifted hands. I declare with truth, that I have never seen with my eyes, nor heard with my ears, any man so earnest in giving thanks to the living God. " 0 truly happy man ! He chanted the sentence of St. Paul the apostle, ' It is dreadful to fall into the hands of the living God,' and much more out of Holy Writ ; wherein also he admonished us to think of our last hour, and to shake off the sleep of the soul ; and being learned in our poetry, he said some things also in our tongue, for he said, putting the same into English, " ' For tham neod-fere Nenig wyrtheth Thances snottra Thonne him thearf sy To gehiggene which means this : — " ' No man is wiser than is requisite, before the necessary departure ; that is, to consider, before the soul departs hence, what good or evil it hath done, and how it is to be judged after its departure.' " He also sang antiphons according to our custom and his own, one of which is, ' O glorious King, Lord of all power, who, triumphing this day, didst ascend above all the heavens ; do not forsake us orphans ; but send down upon us the Spirit c 2 Mr Ids heonen-gange Hwet his gaste Godes oththe yveles -^fter deathe heonen Denied woirthe.' XX PREFACE. of truth which was promised to us by the Father. Hallelu- jah!' And when he came to that word, 'do not forsake us,' he burst into tears, and wept much, and an hour after he began to rej^eat what he had commenced, and we, hearing it, mourned with him. By turns we read, and by turns we wept, nay, we wept always whilst we read. In such joy W3 passed the days of Lent, till the aforesaid day ; and he re- joiced much, and gave God thanks, because he had been thought worthy to be so weakened. He often repeated, ' That God scourgeth every son whom he receiveth ;' and much more out of Holy Scripture ; as also this sentence from St. Ambrose, ' I have not lived so as to be ashamed to live among you ; nor do I fear to die, because we have a gracious God.' During these days he laboured to compose two works well worthy to be remembered, besides the lessons we had from him, and singing of Psalms ; viz. he translated the Gospel of St. John as lar as the words : ' But what are these among so many,' etc. [St. John, vi. 9.] into our own tongue, for the benefit of the church ; and some collections out of the Book of Notes of bishop Isidorus, saying : ' I will not have my pupils read a falsehood, nor labour therein without profit after my death.' When the Tuesday before the ascension of our Lord came, he began to suffer still more in his breath, and a small swelling appeared in his feet ; but he passed all that day and dictated cheerfully, and now and then among other things, said, ' Go on quickly, I know not how long I shall hold out, and whether my Maker will not soon take me away.' But to us he seemed very Avell to know the time of his ^'.cparture ; and so he spent the night, awake, in thanks- giving ; and when the morning appeared, that is, Wednesday, he ordered us to write with all speed what he had begun ; and this done, we walked till the third hour with the relies of saints, according to the custom of that day. There was one of us with him, who said to him, ' Most dear master, tliere is still one chapter wanting : do you think it trouble- some to be asked any more questions ?' He answered, 'It is no trouble. Take your pen, and make ready, and write fast.' Which he did, but at the ninth hour he said to me, ' I have some little articles of value in my chest, such as pepper, nap- kins, and incense : run quickly, and bring the priests of our monastery to me, that I may distribute among them the gifts LIFE OF BEDE. XXI which God has bestowed on me. The rich in this world are bent on giving gold and silver and other precious things. But I, in charity, will joyfully give my brothers what God has given unto me.' He spoke to every one of them, admo- nishing and entreating them that they would carefully say masses and prayers for him, which they readily promised ; but they all mourned and wept, especially because he said, * They should no more see his face in this world.' They re- joiced for that he said, ' It is time that I return to Him who formed me out of nothing : I have lived long ; my merciful Judge well foresaw my life for me ; the time of my dissolu- tion draws nigh ; for I desire to die and to be with Christ.' Having said much more, he passed the day joyfully till the evening ; and the boy, above mentioned, said : ' Dear master, there is yet one sentence not written.' He answered, ' Write quickly.' Soon after, the boy said, 'The sentence is now written.' He replied, ' It is well, you have said the truth. It is ended. Receive my head into your hands, for it is a great satisfaction to me to sit facing my holy place, where I was wont to pray, that I may also sitting call upon my Father.' And thus on the pavement of his little cell, singing : ' Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost,' when he had named the Holy Ghost, he breathed his last, and so departed to the heavenly kingdom. All who were present at the death of the blessed father, said they had never seen any other person expire with so much devotion, and in so tranquil a frame of mind. For as you have heard, so long as the soul animated his body, he never ceased to give thanks to the true and living God, with expanded hands exclaiming : ' Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost !' with other spiritual ejaculations. But know this, dearest brother, that I could say much concerning him, if my want of learn- ing did not cut short my discourse. Nevertheless, by the grace of God, I purpose shortly to write more concerning him, particularly of those things which I saw with my own eyes, and heard with my own ears." As we learn from this letter of Cuthbert that Bede died on St. Ascension-day wliich he states to have been that year the seventh before the kalends of June, this fact enables us to fix it on the 26th May, in the year of our Lord 735. The remains of the venerable Bede were placed first under XXll PREFACE. the south porch of the church. After being removed to a more honourable situation ^vithin the church, they were stolen from the monastery by Elfred a priest of Durban], who used for some years previously to offer up his prayers at Bede's tomb, on the anniversary of his death. " On one of these occasions," says Simeon of Durham, "he went to Jarrow as usual, and having spent some days in the church in solitude, praying and watcliing, he returned in the early morning alone to Durham, without the know- ledge of his companions — a thing which he had never done before — as though he wished to have no witness to his secret. Now, although he lived many years afterwards, yet he never again visited Jarrow, and it appeared as if he had achieved the object of his desires. When, also, he was asked by his most intimate friends, ' Where were the bones of venerable Bede?' he would reply, 'No one can answer that question so well as I. You may be assured, my brethren, beyond all doubt, that the same chest wliich holds the hallowed body of our father Cuthbert, also contains the bones of Bede, our reverend teacher and brother. It is useless to search be- yond that little corner for any portion of his relics.' " By this artifice the cathedral of Durham obtained posses- sion of a valuable source of revenue in the offerings which were sure to be made at the tomb of so venerable a man. The theft was kept secret by the bretln-en until all who could have reclaimed the body were dead, and so Bede's bones remained until a.d. 1104, when St. Cuthbert's relics Vv^ere removed, and those of Bede were placed alone in a linen bag in the same chest. Fifty years afterwards Hugh Pudsey, bishop of Durham, erected a shrine of gold and silver, adorned with jewels, in which he enclosed the relics of venerable Bede, with an inscription placed on it, which may be translated thus : Within this chest Bede's mortal body lies. In the reign of Henry VIII this beautiful shrine was demolished, and the saintly relics were treated with every indignity by the insane and ignorant mob. The only me- morial now remaining in Durham cathedral of its having once been the resting-place of Bede's remains, is a long OF BEDE S ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY. XXiu inscription to his memory concluding with the well known monkish rhyme : — ' l^ac sunt in fossa IBeUae bcncrabilis ossa." Here lie beneath these stones — venerable Bede's bones. CHAP, in.— ANALYSIS OF BEDE'S ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY. The Ecclesiastical History of venerable Bede was first published on the Continent : numerous editions of it have been printed, which it is here necessary to enumerate. It was first published in England by Wheloc, fol. Cantab. 1643-4, with an Appendix containing the An o;lo- Saxon translation by king Alfred the Great. To this succeeded the edition of Smith, printed at Cam- bridge in 1722, which superseded all the preceding. The basis of this edition was a MS. formerly belonging to More, bishop of Ely, and now deposited in the public library at Cambridge. [Kk, 5, 16.] At the end of the MS., which is written in Anglo-Saxon letters, are several notes in a some- what later handwriting, by which it would appear that the volume was copied in the year 737, i.e. two years after Bede's death, and probably from the author's original manu- script. The last edition of this celebrated and valuable work is that of Stevenson, pubhshed by the English Historical Society, Lond. 8vo. 1838. The editor professes to have used the same MS. of bishop More, and to have occasionally collated four others [Cotton. Tib. C, 11, Tib. A, XIV, Harl. 4978, and King's MS. 13 C, V.]. Prefixed to the volume is a copious and valuable notice of the author and liis work, from Avhich we take the liberty of making the following long extract, as containing the most judicious account of this our author's greatest work. " The scope of this valuable and justly esteemed work is sufficiently indicated by its title. After some observations upon the position, inhabitants, and natural productions of Britain, the author gives a rapid sketch of its history from the earliest period until the arrival of Augustine in a.d. 597, at which era, in his opinion, the ecclesiastical history of our JCXIV PREFACE. nation had its commencement. After that event, he treats, as was to be expected, for a time exclusively of the circumstances which occurred in Kent ; but, as Christianity extended itself over the other kingdoms into which England was then divided, he gradually includes their history in his narrative, until he reaches the year 731. Here he concludes his work, which embraces a space of one hundred and thirty-four years, with a Ereneral outline of the ecclesiastical state of the island. " The Introduction, which extends from the commence- ment of the work to the conversion of the Saxons to Chris- tianity, is gleaned, as Bede himself informs us, from various writers. The chief sources for the description of Britain ai'e Pliny, Solinus, Orosius, and Gildas ; St. Basil is also cited ; and the traditions which were current in Bede's own day are occasionally introduced. The history of the Romans in Britain is founded chiefly upon Orosius, Eutropius, and Gil- das, corrected, however, in some places by the author, appar- ently from tradition or local information, and augmented by an account of the introduction of Christianity under Lucius, of the martyrdom of St. Alban, copied apparently from some legend, and of the origin of the Pelagian heresy, — all of them circumstances intimately connected with the ecclesiast- ical history of the island. The mention of Hengist and Horsa, and the allusion to the tomb of the latter at Horstead, render it probable that the account which Bede gives of the arrival of the Teutonic tribes, and their settlement in Eng- land, was communicated by Albinus and Nothelm. It is purely fabulous, being, in fact, not the history, but the tradi- tion, of the Jutish kingdom of Kent, as appears from circum- stances mentioned elsewhere in this work, as well as from the authorities there quoted. The two visits of Germanus to England, so important in the history of its religion, are introduced in the very words of Constantius Lugdunensis, and must therefore have been copied from that author. The ante- Augustine portion of the history is terminated by ex- tracts from Gildas, relative to the conflicts between the Saxons and Britons. As the mission of Augustine in a.d. 596 is the period at which Bede ceases to speak of himself as a compiler, and assumes the character of an historian, it be- comes incumbent upon us to examine into the sources upon OF BEDES ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY. XXV whicli he has founded this, by far the most interesting por- tion of his history. The materials which he employed seem to have consisted of (i.) written documents, and (ii.) verbal information, (i.) The written materials may be divided into (1.) Historical information draAvn up and communicated by his correspondents for the express purpose of being employed in his work ; (2.) documents pre-existing in a narrative form, and (3.) transcripts of official documents. "(1.) That Bede's correspondents drew up and communi- cated to him information which he used when writing this history, is certain from what he states in its prologue ; and it is highly probable that to them we are indebted for many particulars connected with the history of kingdoms situated to the south of the river Humber, with which a monk of Jarrow, from his local position, was probably unacquainted. Traces of the assistance which he derived from Canterbury are perceptible in the minute acquaintance which he exhibits not only with the topography of Kent, but with its condition at the time when he wrote ; and the same remark is appli- cable, although in a more limited degree, to most of the soutJ:iern kingdoms. '^(2.) Documents pre-existing in an historical form are seldom quoted : amongst those of which use has been made may be numbered the Life of Gregory the Great, written by Paulus Diaconus ; the miracles of Ethelberga, abbess of Barking ; the Life of Sebbi, king- of the East Saxons ; the Legend of Fursey; and that of Cuthbert of Lindisfarne, formerly written by Bede, but now augmented by himself, with additional facts. These, together with some extracts from the Treatise of Arculf de Locis Sanctis, are all the written documents to which the author refers. " That other narratives, however, were in Bede's posses- sion, of which he has made liberal use, is certain from his express words, and may also be inferred from internal evi- dence. Albinus and Nothelm appear to have furnished him with chronicles, in which he found accurate and fuU informa- tion upon the pedigrees, accessions, marriages, exploits, descend- ants, deaths, and burials of the kings of Kent. From the same source he derived his valuable account of the archbishops of Canterbury, both before and after ordination, the place and date of consecration, even though it took place abroad the XXVI PREFACE. dajs on which they severally took possession of that see, the duration of their episcopate, their deaths, burial-j^laces, and the intervals Avhich elapsed before the election of a successor. It is evident that the minuteness and accuracy of this in- formation could have been preserved only by means of con- temporary written memoranda. That such records existed in the time of the Saxons cannot be doubted, for Bede intro- duces a story by which it appears that the abbey of Selsey possessed a volume in which were entered the obits of eminent individuals; and the same custom probably pre- vailed throughout the other monastic establishments of Eng- land. " The history of the diocese of Rochester was communi- cated by Albinus and Nothelm. It is exceedingly barren of particulars, and probably would have been even more so, had it not been connected with the life of Paulinus of York, con- cerning whom Bede appears to have obtained information from other quarters. " The early annals of East Anglia are equally scanty, as we have little more than a short pedigree of its kings, an account of its conversion to Christianity, the history of Sigebert and Anna, and a few particulars regarding its bishops, Felix, Thomas, Bertgils, and Bisi, which details were communicated in part by Albinus and Nothelm. "The history of the West Saxons was derived partly from the same authorities, and partly from the information of Daniel, bishop of Winchester. It relates to their conversion by Birinus, the reigns of Ceedwalla and of Ina, and the pon- tificate of Wini, Aldhelm, and Daniel. To this last named bishop we are indebted for a portion of the little of what is known as to the early history of the South Saxons and the Isle of Wight, the last of the Saxon kingdoms which em- braced the Christian faith. It relates to the conversion of those districts by the agency of Wilfrid. A few unimport- ant additions are afterwards made in a hurried and incidental manner, evidently showing that Bede's information upon this head was neither copious nor definite. " The monks of Lastingham furnished materials relative to the ministry of Cedd and Chad, by whose preaching the Mercians were induced to renounce paganism. The history of this kingdom is obscure, and consists of an account of its OF BEDE S ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY. XXVI 1 conversion, the succession of its sovereigns and its bishops. The neighbouring state of Middle Anglia, which, if ever independent of Mercia, soon merged in it, is simihirly circum- stanced, and we are perhaps indebted to its connexion witli the princes and bishops of Northumbria for what is known of its early history. " Lindsey, part of Lincolnshire, although situated so near to the kingdom of Northumbria, was both politically and ecclesiastically independent of it, and Bede was as ignorant of the transactions of that province as of those which were much more remote from Jarrow. He received some mate- rials from bishop Cynebert, but they appear to have been scanty, for the circumstances which relate to Lincoln- shire are generally derived from the information of other witnesses. " The history of East Saxony is more copious, and is derived partly from the communications of Albinus and Nothelm, and partly from the monks of Lastingham. To the first of these two sources we must probably refer the account of the pontificate of Mellitus, and the apostasy of the sons of Sabert, — circumstances too intimately connected with the see of Canterbury to be omitted in its annals. To the latter we are indebted for the history of the recon version of Saxony, — an event in which the monks of Last- ingham were interested, as it was accomplished by their founder Cedd. From them Bede also received an account of the ministry of Chad. Some further details respecting its civil and ecclesiastical affairs, the life of Earconwald, bishop of London, and the journey of O&a to Rome, conclude the information which we have respecting this kingdom. " Li the history of Northumbria Bede, as a native, was particularly interested, and would probably exert himself to procure the most copious and authentic information regard- ing it. Although he gives no intimation of having had access to previous historical documents, when speaking of his sources of information, yet there seems reason to believe that he has made use of such materials. We may infer from what he says of the mode in which Oswald's reign was gene- rally calculated, that in this king's time there existed Annals or Chronological Tables, in which events were inserted as they occurred, the regnal year of the monarch who then XXVlll PREFACE. filled the throne being at the time specified. These annals appear to have extended beyond the period of the conversion of Northumbria to Christianity, although it is difficult to imagine how any chronological calculation or record of events C50uld be preserved before the use of letters had become known. But the history of Edwin, with its interesting de- tails, shows that Bede must have had access to highly valu able materials which reached back to the very earliest era of authentic history; and we need not be surprised at finding information of a similar character throughout the re- mainder of his history of Northumbria. Accordingly we have minute accounts of the pedigrees of its kings, their acces- sion, exploits, anecdotes of them, and sketches of their cha- racter, their deaths, and the duration of their reigns, — details too minute in themselves, and too accurately defined by Bede, to have been derived by liim from tradition. Similar proofs might, if necessary, be drawn from the history of its bishops. "(3.) The Historia Ecclesiastica contains various tran- scripts of important official documents. These are of two classes, either such as were sent from the Papal Court to the princes and ecclesiastics of England, or were the production of native writers. The first were transcribed from the Papal Regesta by Nothelm of London, during a residence at Rome, and were sent to Bede by the advice of his friend Albinus of Canterbury. They relate to the history of the kingdoms of Kent and Northumbria. The letters of archbishops Lau- rentius and Honorius, concerning the proper time for cele- brating Easter, were probably furnished by the same indi- vidual. The proceedings of the councils of Hertford and Hatfield may have been derived from the archives of Bede's own monastery, since it was customary in the early ages of the church for each ecclesiastical establishment to have a *tabularium' in which were deposited the synodal decrees by which its members were governed. "(ii.) A considerable portion of the Historia Ecclesiastica, especially that part of it Avhicli relates to the kingdom of Northumberland, is founded upon local information which its author derived from various individuals. On almost every occasion Bede gives the name and designation of liis inform- ant, being anxious, apparently, to show that nothing is in- OF BEDE S ECCLESIASTICAL niSTORY. XXIX serted for which he had not the testimony of some respect- able witness. Some of these persons are credible from having been present at the event which they related j others, from the high rank which they held in the church, such as Acca, bishop of Hexham, Gutlifrid, abbat of Lindisfarne, Berthun, abbat of Beverley, and Pechthelm, bishop of Whit- herne. The author received secondary evidence with caution, for he distinguishes between the statements which he received from eye-witnesses, and those which reached him through a succession of informants. In the last of these instances, the channel of information is always pointed out with scrupulous exactness, whatever opinion we may entertain, as in the case of some visions and miracles, of the credibiHty of the facts themselves." Of the value of this work we can have no better evidence than the fact of its having been so often translated into the vernacular tongue. King Alfred thought it not beneath his dignity to render it familiar to his Anglo-Saxon subjects, by translating it into their tongue. The first version in modern English was that of Stapleton, bearing the follomng title, " The History of the Church ol Englande, compiled by Venerable Bede, Englishman, trans- lated out of Latin into English by Thomas Stapleton, Student in Divinity. Antw. by John Laet, 1565." The object of the translator was to recall the affections of the people to the theological forms and doctrines which in his time were being exploded. In the dedication to queen Elizabeth occurs the following passage : — " In this History Your Hignes shall see in how many and weighty pointes the pretended reformers of the Church in Your Graces dominions have departed from the patern of that sounde and catholike faith planted first among Englishmen by holy S. Augustin our Apostle, and his virtuous company, described truly and sincerely by Venerable Bede, so called in all Christendom for his passing vertues and rare learning, the Author of this History. And to thentent Your Highnes intention bent to weightier consider- ations and affaires may spende no longe time in espying oute the particulars, I have gathered out of the whole History a number of diversities betwene the pretended religion of Protestants, and the primitive faith of the English Church." XXX PREFACE, The work was again translated into English by John Ste- vens, Lond. 8vo. 1723; and a third time (with some omis- sions) by W. Hurst, Lond. 8vo. 1814, and apparently with the same object which influenced Stapleton. In 1840, the editor of the present volume published a new edition of Stevens's translation, altering it in many respects, and correcting the orthography of proper names, according to the modern and generally received standard. A second edition of the same volume was published in 1842. In the same year also it was introduced, to accompany the Latin text, in the second volume of an edition of the complete works of Venerable Bede, and is now a fourth time printed with the other works contained in this volume. As the trans- lation has on each occasion received certain corrections, it is hoped that the English reader will now find it to convey a tolerably accurate notion of the style and sense of the original. CHAP. IV.— OF THE SAXON CHRONICLE. The work, which passes under the name of the Saxon Chroni- cle, is a continued narrative written at diff*erent dates, and in the Anglo-Saxon language, of the most important events of English History from the earliest period to the year of our Lord 1154. As it is evident, both from the antiquity of the very manuscripts of it now extant, as well as from certain allusions and forms of speech which occur in it, that the latter part of it at least was written by a person contempo- rary with the events which he relates, it cannot but be an object of interest and of great historical importance to ex- amine so ancient a writing according to all the modes which literary criticism can suggest ; and this inquiry becomes the more imperative from the extreme probability that the earlier part of the Chronicle is also of a contemporary character, and therefore ascends to a very earlier period of Saxon liis- tory, even to the time of the Heptarchy itself This opinion rests upon the remarkable fact, that whilst the dialect of the latter portion of the Cln-onicle approaches very nearly to our modern English, the early part of it bears the impress of times much more rude and ancient, and the language in which it is written is absolutely unintelligible to the modern Englislunan, who has not made the Anglo-Saxon tongue a serious object of his study. SAXON CHRONICLE. XXXI The first point which suggests itself to the inquirer, con- cerns the form in which so valuable a national monument has come down to us. I shall not deem it necessary to delay the reader's attention by an account of the mode in which our large public and private collections of manuscripts have been formed. It is sufficient to observe that in all our col- lections of MSS. there are now only six ancient copies of the Saxon Chronicle known to be in existence. We will proceed to enumerate and describe them in order. I. The first copy of this Chronicle is generally known by the name of the Benet or Plegmund MS., so called because it is preserved in Benet [now Corpus Christi] College, Cam- bridge, and because Plegmund, archbishop of Canterbury, in the reign of king Alfred, is thought to have had some hand in compiling the first part of it. " From internal evidence of an indirect nature," says Dr. Ingram, " there is great reason to presume that archbishop Plegmund transcribed or superintended this very copy of the Saxon Annals to the year 891, the year in which he came to the see. Wanley observes it is written in one and the same hand to this year, and in hands equally ancient to the year 924, after which it is continued in difi'erent hands to the end. " At the end of the year 890 is added, in a neat but imita- tive hand, the following interpolation, which is betrayed by the faintness of the ink, as well as by the Norman cast of the dialect and orthography : "Her waes Plegemund gecoron of gode and of eallen liis halechen. " There are many other interpolations in this MS. ;* a par- ticular account of which, however curious, would necessarily become tedious. A few only are here selected, with a view to illustrate the critical apparatus of this work, and the pro- gressive accumulation of liistorical facts. They are generally very short, except where an erasure has been made to find room for them. The notice of the birth of St. Dunstan, as of every thing else relating to him, appears to be a monastic interpolation. His death is mentioned in the margin, in a very minute hand, in Latin. There seems to be nothing of any great value in this MS. beyond the time of Alfric, whose * The death of Plejrmund for instance. XXXU PKEFACE. death is recorded, after a considerable cliasm, in the year 1006. After this period the notices of events and transac- tions are very scanty and defective. The royal donation of the haven of Sandwich to Christ Church, Canterbury, is placed to the year 1031, but evidently written after the con- quest, and left unfinished. The Saxon part ends in the year 1070, with the words, - - bletsungan underfeng ; after de- scribing at full length the dispute between the archbishops of Canterbury and York."* II. The second copy of the Saxon Chronicle is in the British Museum. [MS. Cotton, Tiberius A. vi.] It is " written in the same hand with much neatness and accuracy, from the beginning to the end," and " is of very high autho- rity and antiquity. It was probably written c. 977, where it terminates. The hand -writing resembles that ascribed to St. Dunstan. It narrowly escaped destruction in the fire at Westminster, previous to its removal to its present place of custody, being one of Sir R. Cotton's MSS., formerly be- longing to the monastery of St. Augustine's, Canterbury."! in. A third MS. is also in the British Museum. [Cott. Tib. B. i.] ■ " This MS., though frequently quoted by Somner in his Dictionary under the title of ' Chronica AbbendonifB,' or the Abingdon Chronicle, and said to have been transcribed by him, seems not to have been known to Gibson, though no- ticed by Nicolson within a few years after the appearance of his edition. J It contains many important additions to the former Chronicles, some of which are confirmed by C.T. B. iv. ; but many are not to be found in any other MS., par- ticularly those in the latter part of it. These are now incor- porated with the old materials. Wanley considers the hand- writing to be the same to the end of the year 1048. The orthography, however, varies about the year 890 (889 of the printed Chronicle). The writer seems to have been startled at Offoe for Oththan, i. e. Othoni, a.d. 925 ; for there is a chasm from that place to the year 934, -when a slight notice is introduced of the expedition of Athelstan into Scotland. § • Dr. Ingram's preface, p. xx. + Ibid. X English Historical Library, Part I. p. 116. $ Most of the MSS. are defective here ; and the thread of history, during this turbulent period, appears to have been often disturbed. But SAXON CHRONICLE. XXXlii In the year 982 are some curious particulars respecting tlie wars of Otho II. in Greece, and his victories there over the Saracens, now first printed. From the same source, and from C. T. B. iv., we have been enabled to present to the reader of English history a more copious and accurate ac- count than has hitherto appeared, of the Danish invasions, the civil wars in the reign of Edward the Confessor, and the battles of Harold previous to the ISTorman Conquest. The MS. terminates imperfectly in 1066, after describing most minutely the battle of Stanford-bridge ; the few lines which appear in the last page being supplied by a much later hand." IV. A fourth copy of the Saxon Chronicle occurs also in the British Museum. [Cott. Tiberius B. iv.] " This MS. like the preceding, though of invaluable autho- rity, was unknown to Gibson. It is written in a plain and beautiful hand, with few abbreviations, and apparently copied in the early part, with the exception of the introduc- tory description of Britain, from a very ancient MS. The defective parts, from a.d. 261 to 693, were long since sup- plied from four excellent MSS. by Josselyn ; who also col- lated it throughout with the same ; inserting from them, both in the text and in the margin, such passages as came within his notice ; which are so numerous, that very few seem to have eluded his vigilant search. A smaller but elegant hand commences fol. 68, a.d. 1016 ; and it is con- tinued to the end, a.d. 1079, in a similar hand, though by different Avriters. \Yanley notices a difference in the year 1052. The value and importance of this MS.,'as well as of the preceding, will be best exemplified by a reference to the notes and various readings in the present edition. The last notice of it will be found in page 456." y. The fifth MS. is in the Bodleian Library at Oxford. [Laud E, 80.] It is so " well known, from being made the basis of Gib- son's edition where Wheloc's was deficient, that it will not be so necessary to enlarge on it here. It is a fair copy of older Chronicles, with a few inaccuracies, omissions, and interpo- lations, to the year 1 122 ; therefore no part of it was written poetry took advantage of the circumstance, and occasionally filled a chasm with some of the earliest specimens of the northern muse ; the preservation of which we owe exclusively to the Saxon Chronicle. d XXXIV PHEFACE. befere that period. The next ten years rather exhibit differ- ent ink than a different writer. From 1132 to the end, A.D. 1154, the language and orthography became gradually more Normanized, particularly in the reign of king Stephen ; the account of which was not written till the close of it. The dates not being regularly affixed to the last ten years, Wanley has inadvertently described this MS. as ending A.D. 1143; whereas it is continued eleven years after- wards." yi. The sixth and last copy is in the British Museum. [Cotton, Domitian A. viii.] " This is a singularly curious MS., attributed generally to a monk of Christ Church, Canterbury, on account of the monastic interpolations. It is often quoted and commended by H. Wharton, in his Anglia Sacra, because it contains much ecclesiastical and local information. We consider it, however, of the least authority among the Cotton MSS., because the writer has taken greater liberties in abridging former Chronicles, and inserting translations of Latin docu- ments in his own Normanized dialect. Frithstan, bishop of Winchester, who died a.d. 931 according to tliis Chronicle, is called biscop Wentanus ; and Byrnstanus [Brinstan] is said to have been consecrated on his loh — in ejus locum, lieu, Fr. Its very peculiarities, nevertheless, stamp a great value on it ; and its frauds are harmless, if possible, because they are easily detected. Towards the end the writer intended to say something about prince Edward, the father of Edgar and Margaret ; but it is nearly obliterated, and the MS. soon after concludes, a.d. 1058. It is remarkable for being written both in Latin and Saxon ; but for what purpose it is now needless to conjecture. It is said to have been given to Sir Robert Cotton by Camden. The passages printed from it by Gibson, and the variations in the margin, marked Cot., are from the collations of eJunius inserted in his copy of Wheloc. There does not appear to have been any entire transcript of the MS., as we find it sometimes stated.* Gib- son takes no notice of the introductory description of Britain as being in this MS., and he dates its termination in the wrong place. We have therefore had recourse to it again in tJie British Museum, where it is deposited." * Vid. Wanl. Cat. p. 220. SAXON CHRONICLE. XXXV Besides these six, no other ancient copy is known to exist ; but there is a single leaf of an ancient copy in the British Museum. [Cotton, Tiberius A iii.] There are also three modern transcripts, two of which are in the Bodleian library, [Junian MSS. and Laud G. 36,] and one in the Dublin library. [E 5, 15.] The Bodleian transcripts are taken from two of the Cotton MSS., and therefore are of little critical value ; but the Dublin transcript appears to be taken from an original, now lost, [Cott. Otho B. xi.] and therefore it possesses an independent authority. " At the end of the Dublin transcript is this note, in the hand-writing of archbishop Usher : ' These Annales are ex- tant in S' R. Cotton's Librarye at the ende of Bede's His- torye in the Saxon Tongue.' Tliis accords with the descrip- tion of the MS. in Wanley's Catalogue, p. 219 ; to which the reader is referred for more minute particulars. As this MS. was therefore in existence so late as 1705, when Wanley published his Catalogue, there can be little doubt that it perished in the lamentable fire of 1731, which either destroyed or damaged so many of the Cotton MSS. while deposited in a house in Little Dean's Yard, Westminster." " This transcript is become more valuable from the loss of the original. It appears from dates by Lambard himself, at the beginning and end, that it was begun by him in 1563, and finished in 1564, when he was about the age of twenty- five. Li the front is this inscription in Saxon characters : Willm lambarde, 1563 ; and, wulfhelm lambheord ; with this addition, waeccath thine leoht-faet ; which may be thus translated ; * Lambard, arise ; awake thy lamp.' At the end is the following memorandum : ' Finis : 9 Aprilis, 1564. W. L. propria manu.' I am informed by several gentlemen of Trinity College, Dublin, to whom I am indebted for most of the particulars relating to this transcript, that it was once in the possession of archbishop Usher, and is the same mentioned in his Ecclesiastical History, p. 182, which Nicolson says ' is worth the inquiring after.' * It came into the Dublin Library with the other MSS. of the archbishop, according to liis original intention, after the restoration of Charles IL" * English Historical Library, Part I. p. II 7. d 2 XXXVl PREFACE. To these six, or if we include the Dublin MS., seven, copies of the Saxon Chronicle, must our inquiry therefore be confined ; and the first point ■worthy of notice, is the fact, that no two of them agree in the date at which they termi- nate. Thus : No. 2. comes down no later than a.d. 977. „ 7. ends at a.d. 1001. „ 6. ends imperfectly at 1058. „ 3. ends at 1066. ,, 1. ends at 1070. „ 4. ends abruptly at 1080. „ 5. ends imperfectly at 1154. This diversity can hardly be accounted for on any other view of the case, than that wliich applies to a large number of other ancient writings, and is j^eculiarly forcible as ap- plied to a series of annals like the work before us. Almost every monastery had its own historiographer or historian, whose business or at least whose general practice it was to copy the history of preceding times from those who were already known to have written of them with success, and to continue the narrative, during his own times, in his own words, to the best of his ability. Now in the case of the Saxon Chronicle we may reasonably suppose that its original groundwork consisted of little more than a meagre string of events, arranged chronologically with a few genealogies and notices of the deaths and births of the kings and other distinguished personages. In the limited dimensions within wliich learning was confined during the Anglo-Saxon Heptarchy, and in consequence also of the paucity of scholars, it is more likely that such a record would become generally used than that new ones would be written, and most of the monasteries would probably possess a copy of the early part of these annals, which afterwards they would bring down to tlieir own times. Consistent with this theory is the evident fact that the existing MSS. coming from difterent religious houses, all differ in the year at which they terminate, as if the last transcriber of the shortest had not been aware that the copy which he followed was less com.plete than those which existed elsewhere.* '^ case exactly in point to illustrate this suggestion occurs in the letters of Arnulf bishop of Lisieux under Henry II. Seven MSS. only exist : SAXON CHRONICLE. XXXVU But there is another peculiarity in the MSS. of the Saxon Chronicle which almost proves for certain the account above given. Some of these MSS. are more diffuse than the others about the affairs of the particular monastery in which they are believed to have been written. Thus one of them, especially, is most minute concerning the affairs of Peter- borough,— a fact, which, almost without other evidence, would prove it to have been transcribed within the walls of that monastery. However this theory, which lies upon the surface of the inquiry concerning the mode in which the Saxon Chronicle was compiled, may be thought worthy or not of the reader's attention, I am not disposed to waive it in favour of any other ; for numerous writers have already tried to go more deeply into the subject, and have failed in eliciting more than vague and remote probabilities. The following remarks are taken from the Preface of Dr. Ingram, and I do not scruple to insert them, although the quotation is rather long, because they show the train of thought which arose in the mind of one who as yet stands foremost among the translators and illustrators of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. "It is now time to examine, who were probably the writers of these annals. I say probably, because we have very little more than rational conjecture to guide us. " The period antecedent to the times of Bede, except where passages were afterwards asserted, was perhaps little else, originally, than a kind of chronological table of events, with a few genealogies, and notices of the death and succession of kings and other distinguished personages. But it is evident from the preface of Bede and from many passages in his work, that he received considerable assistance from Saxon bishops, abbats and others ; who not only communicated certain traditionary facts viva voce, but also transmitted to him many written documents. These, tJierefore, must have been the early chronicles of Wessex, of Kent, and of the other provinces of the Heptarchy ; whic^h formed together the groundwork of his history. With greater honesty than most of his followers, he has given us the names of those six of which contain about seventy letters only. On coming to examine the seventh in St. John's College Library, I was at once enabled to augment the number to 130. XXXVIU PREFACE. learned persons who assisted him with this local information. The first is Alcuinus or Albinus, an abbat of Canterbury, at whose instigation he undertook the work ; who sent by Nothelm, afterwards archbishop of that province, a full account of all ecclesiastical transactions in Kent, and in the contiguous districts, from the first conversion of the Saxons. From the same source he partly derived his information respecting the provinces of Essex, Wessex, East Anglia, and Northumbria. Bishop Daniel communicated to him by letter many particulars concerning Wessex, Sussex, and the Isle of Wight. He acknowledges assistance more than once ^ ex scriptis priorum ; ' and there is every reason to believe that some of these preceding records were the Anglo-Saxon annals ; for we have already seen that such records were in existence before the age of Nennius. In proof of this we may observe, that even the phraseology sometimes partakes more of the Saxon idiom than the Latin. If, therefore, it be admitted, as there is every reason to conclude from the foregoing remarks, that certain succinct and chronological arrangements of liistorical facts had taken place in several provinces of the Heptarchy before the time of Bede, let us inquire by whom they were likely to have been made. " In the province of Kent, the first pei'son on record, who is celebrated for liis learning, is Tobias, the ninth bishop of Rochester, who succeeded to that see in 693. He is noticed by Bede as not only furnished with an ample store of Greek and Latin literature, biit skilled also in the Saxon language and erudition. It is probable, therefore, that he left some proofs of this attention to his native language ; and, as he died within a few years of Bede, the latter would naturally avail himself of his labours. It is worthy also of remark, that Berthwald, who succeeded to the illustrious Theodore of Tarsus in 690, was the first English or Saxon archbishop of Canterbury. From this period, consequently, we may date that cultivation of the vernacular tongue which would lead to the composition of brief chronicles, * and other vehicles of instruction, necessary for the improvement of a rude and illiterate people. The first chronicles were, perhaps, those of Kent or Wessex ; which seem to have been regularly * " The materials, liowever, though not regularly arranged, must be traced to a much hi-iiher source. SAXON CHRONICLE. XXXIX continued, at intervals, by the archbishops of Canterbury, or by their direction,* at least as far as the year 1001, or even 1070 ; for the Benet MS. which some call the Plegmund MS. ends in the latter year ; the rest being in I.atin. From internal evidence indeed, of an indirect nature, there is great reason to presume, that archbishop Plegmund transcribed or superintended this very copy of the Saxon annals to the year 891 ; f the year in which he came to the see ; inserting, both before and after this date, to the time of his death in 923, such additional materials as he was well qualified to furnish from his high station and learning, and the confidential intercourse which he enjoyed in the court of king Alfred. The total omission of his own name, except by another hand, affords indirect evidence of some importance in support of this con- jecture. Whether king Alfred himself was the author of a distinct and separate Chronicle of Wessex, cannot now be determined. That he furnished additional supplies of historical matter to the older chronicles is, I conceive, sufiiciently obvious to every reader who will take the trouble of examining the subject. The argument of Dr. Beeke, the present dean of Bristol, in an obliging letter to the editor on this subject, is not without its force ; — that it is extremely improbable, when we consider the number and variety of king Alfred's works, that he should have neglected the history of his own country. Besides a genealogy of the kings of Wessex from Cerdic to his own time, which seems never to have been incorporated with any MS. of the Saxon Chronicle, though prefixed or annexed to several, he un- doubtedly preserved many traditionary facts ; with a full and circumstantial detail of his own operations, as well as those of his father, brother, and other members of his family ; which scarcely any other person than himself could have supplied. To doubt this, would be as incredulous a thing as to deny that Xenophon wrote his Anabasis, or Csesar his Commentaries. From the time of Alfred and Plegmund to * " Josselyn collated two Kentish MSS. of the first authority ; one of which he calls the History or Chronicle of St. Augustine's, the other that of Christ Church, Canterbury. The former was perhaps the one marked in our series C. T. A vi. ; the latter the Benet or Plegmund MS. f " Wanley observes, that the Benet MS. is written in one and the same hand to this year, and in hands equally ancient to the year 924 ; after which it is continued m different hands to the end. Vid. Cat. p. 130. xl PREFACE. a few years after the Norman Conquest, these chronicles seem to have been continued by different hands, under the auspices of such men as archbishops Dunstan, Alfric, and others, whose characters have been much misreiDresented by ignorance and scepticism on the one hand, as well as by mistaken zeal and devotion on the other. The indirect evidence respecting Dunstan and Alfric is as curious as that concerning Plegmund ; but the discussion of it would lead us into a wide and barren field of investigation ; nor is this the place to refute the errors of Hickes, Cave, and Wharton, already noticed by Wanley in his preface. The Chronicles of Abingdon, of Worcester, of Peterborough, and others, are continued in the same manner by different hands ; partly, though not exclusively, by monks of those monasteries, who very naturally inserted many particulars relating to their own local interests and concerns ; which, so far from invalidating the general history, render it more interesting and valuable. It would be a vain and frivolous attempt to ascribe these latter compilations to particular persons,* where there were evidently so many contributors ; but that they were successively furnished by contemporary writers, many of whom were eye-witnesses of the events and trans- actions which they relate, there is abundance of internal evidence to convince us. Many instances of this the editor had taken some pains to collect, in order to lay them before the reader in the preface ; but they are so numerous tliat the subject would necessarily become tedious ; and therefore every reader must be left to find them for himself. They will amply repay him for his trouble, if he takes any interest in the early history of England, or in the general construction of authentic history of any kind. He will see plagiarisms without end in the Latin histories, and will be in no danger of faiUng into the errors of Gale and others ; not to mention those of our historians, who were not professed antiquaries, who mistook that for original and authentic testimony which was only translated. It is remarkable that the Saxon Chronicle gradually expires with the Saxon language, almost melted into modern EngUsh, in the year 1154. • " Hickes supposed the Laud or Peterborough Chronicle to have been compiled by Hugo Candidus (Albus, or White), or some other monk of that house. SAXOx ciiroxiclp:. xli From tins period almost to the Reformation, whatever knowh;dge we have of the aifairs of England has been originally derived either from the semi-barbarous Latin of our own countrymen, or from the French chronicles of Froissart and others. " The revival of good taste and of good sense, and of the good old custom adopted by most nations of the civilized world — that of writing their own history in their own language — was happily exemplified at length in the laborious works of our English chroniclers and historians. " Many have since followed in the same track ; and the importance of the whole body of English history has attracted and employed the imagination of Milton, the philosophy of Hume, the simplicity of Goldsmith, the industry of Henry, the research of Turner, and the patience of Lingard. The pages of these writers, however, accurate and luminous as they generally are, as well as those of Brady, Tyrrel, Carte, Rapin, and others, not to mention those in black letter, still require correction from the Saxon Chronicle ; without which no person, however learned, can possess any thing beyond a superficial acquaintance with the elements of English history, and of the British Constitution. " Some remarks may here be requisite on the chroxologt of the Saxon Chronicle. In the early part of it * the reader will observe a reference to the grand epoch of the creation of the world. So also in Ethelwerd, who closely follows the Saxon annals. It is allowed by all, that considerable difficulty has occurred in fixing the true epoch of Christ's nativity, f because the Christian era was not used at all till about the year 532, ;|: when it was introduced by Dionysius Exiguus ; whose code of canon law, joined afterwards with the decretals of the popes, became as much the standard of authority in ecclesiastical matters as the pandects of Justinian among civilians. But it does not appear that in * "See A.B. XXXIII. the era of Christ's crucifixion. + "See Playfair's System of Chronology, p. 49. X " Playfair says 527 : but I follow Bede, Florence of Worcester, and others ; who affirm that the great paschal cycle of Dionysius commenced from the year of our Lord's incarnation 532 — the year in which the code of .Jnstinian was promulgated. Vid. Flor. an. 532, iU64, and 1073. See also I'vi. V/c-st. an. 532. xlli PREFACE. the Saxon mode of computation this system of chronology was implicitly followed. We mention this circumstance, however, not with a view of settling the point of difference, which would not be easy, but merely to account for those variations observable in different MSS. ; which arose, not only from the common mistakes or inadvertencies of tran- scribers, but from the liberty, which the original writers themselves sometimes assumed in this country, of computing the current year according to their own ephemeral or local custom. Some began with the incarnation or Nativity of Christ ; some with the Circumcision, which accords with the solar year of the Romans as now restored ; whilst others commenced with the Annunciation ; a custom which became very prevalent in honour of the Virgin Mary, and was not formally abolished here till the year 1752 ; when the Gregorian calendar, commonly called the New Style, was substituted by Act of Parliament for the Dionysian. This diversity of computation would alone occasion some con- fusion ; but in addition to tliis, the indiction, or cycle of fifteen years, which is mentioned in the latter part of the Saxon Chronicle, was carried back three years before the vulgar era, and commenced in different places at four different periods of the year ! But it is very remarkable that, whatever was the commencement of the year in the early part of the Saxon Chronicle, in the latter part the year invariably opens with Midwinter-day or the Nativity. Gervase of Canterbury, whose Latin Chronicle ends in 1199, the era of legal memory, had formed a design, as he tells us, of regulating his chronology, by the Annunciation ; but from an honest fear of falsifying dates he abandoned his first intention, and acquiesced in the practice of his prede- cessors ; who for the most part, he says, began the new year with the Nativity."* Let us now see what has been done by previous editors and translators of this valuable national document. Gerard Langbaine was the first who entertained thoughts of publishing this Chronicle ; but he relinquished his design, as appears from his papers in the Bodleian library, because Wheloc had anticipated him. The first edition therefore of the original text of this * « Vid. Prol. in Chron. Gervas. ap. X. Script, p. 1338." SAXON CHRONICLE. xllil work is due to Wheloc, professor of Arabic at Cambridge. His work entitled Chronologia Anglo- Saxonica, [a.d. 1644], occupying about sixty folio pages, forms a supplement to his edition of Bede's Ecclesiastical History. But as Wheloc had the use of only the Bennet or Plegmund MS. [No. 1 in our summary of the MSS.], and of an original, now lost, of which our No. 7, the Dublin transcript, is supposed to be a copy, it is manifest that the editor had no opportunity of inserting those parts of the Chronicle — forming about one half of the whole — which do not occur in those two manu- scripts. Forty-eight years after Wheloc, Gibson, a young man of Queen's College, Oxford, and afterwards bishop of London, published a more complete edition of the Chronicle, for which he used tlii-ee additional MSS. which had come into notice since the time of Wheloc. More than 120 years passed before this historical record again attracted the notice of the public, or the labours of an editor. It was then translated into English throughout from the text of Gibson by a learned lady still living. Miss Gur- ney; to whom, both my enterprising publisher and myself are largely indebted for her kindness in facilitating the pre- sent edition, and to whom we gladly take this opportunity of acknowledging the debt. Miss Gurney's translation was printed for private circula- tion, and did not receive the final polish of the fair trans- lator, who was deterred from bestowing further labour upon a work which was shortly to be undertaken by one of our ablest antiquaries. In 1823 appeared an edition of the vSaxon Chronicle by Dr. Ingram, now President of Trinity College, accompanied with an English translation, a map of Saxon-England, coins of the Saxon kings, &c., &c. At the same time that this learned work made its appear- ance, it was understood that the late Mr. Petrie, keeper of the records in the Tower, was devoting his laborious atten- tion to prepare the Chronicle for publication at the expense of the Record Commission. Accuracy and laborious research were shining features in the literary character of Petrie : but he was less remarkable for discriminating how far an author's text may be illustrated without being overlaid by various readings, and he carried his mode of arrangement Xliv PREFACE. to such extremities, mutilated and subdivided his authors to such a degree, and so encumbered his pages with references, stars, accents, and brackets, that it is doubtful whether the learned and laborious folio, which he superintended to its completion, will ever see the light of publication. It re- mains in the possession of the Master of the Rolls, a mighty storehouse of collations for all future editions of Gildas, Nennius, Bede, the Saxon Chronicle, Florence of Worcester, Henry of Huntingdon, &c., &c. In 1830 appeared a small anonymous volume, entitled, Aiicient History, English and French, exemplified in a regular dissection of the Saxon Chronicle, ^c, 8^c., London^ Hatchard, 1830; containing some lively dissertations in Avhich much genius is displayed, unhappily not leading to clear or satisfactory results. Such being the editions and translations already in exist- ence, it became a serious question with the publisher and editor of the present voliune, what would be the best plan to be pursued, in order that the work might be placed be- fore the public in a form the best adapted to secure general approbation. As the result of this deliberation, it was judged expedient to take the edition of Petrie as a basis, because it was found to contain the most perfect collations of all the six existing manuscripts, and therefore to present a more complete text than any other printed volume. The style of the translation is as literal as the idiom of our language will allow. But, as the edition of Mr. Petrie extends only to tlie year 1066, it has been necessary to form a text for the latter por- tion of the Chronicle from other sources. To effect this the translation of Miss Grurney, has, with the consent of that amiable lady, been taken as a ground-work, and numerous additions, variations, and notes, have been introduced by a collation of her text with that of Dr. Ingram. As the result of these various modes, the public have now the advantage of reading the whole of this very interesting chronicle, not only in a perfect form, but even to an extent that miglit, perhaps, by some be deemed superfluous, with all the variations which can be gathered from all the manu- script copies now known to be in existence. J. A. G. Banip',oii, Oxfordshire, Jidy, 1847. THE ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY ENGLISH NATION. BY VENERABLE BEDE. BOOK I. PREFACE. To the most glorious king Ceolwulph* Bede, the servant of Christ and Priest, I FORMERLY, at jouT request, most readily transmitted to you the Ecclesiastical History of the English Nation, which I had newly published, for you to read, and give it your approbation ; and I now send it again to be transcribed, and more fully considered at your leisure. And I cannot but commend the sincerity and zeal, with which you not only diHgently give ear to hear the words of tlie Holy Scripture, but also industriously take care to become acquainted with the actions and sayings of former men of renown, especially of our own nation. For if history relates good things of good men, the attentive hearer is excited to imitate that which is good ; or if it mentions evil things of wicked per- sons, nevertheless the religious and pious liearer or reader, shunning that which is hurtful and perverse, is the more earnestly excited to perform those things which he knows to be good, and worthy of God. Of which you also being deeply sensible, are desirous that the said history should be more fully made familiar to yourself, and to those over whom * Ceohvulph king of Northumberland, not the king of Wessex, who reigned about a.d. 527 ; nor the king of Mercia, who reigned about a.d. 819. iS BEDE S ECCLESIASTICAL IIISTUKY. [b. i. prbf. the Divine Authority has appointed you governor, from your great regard to their general welfare. But to the end that I may remove all occasion of doubting what I have written, both from yourself and otlier readers or hearers of this his- tory, I will take care briefly to intimate from what autliors I chiefly learned the same. My principal authority and aid in this work was the learned and reverend Abbot Albinus ; who, educated in the Church of Canterbury by those venerable and learned men. Arch- bishop Theodore of blessed memory, and the Abbot Adrian, transmitted to me by Nothelm, the pious priest of the Church of London,* either in writing, or by word of mouth of the same Nothelm, all that he thought worthy of memory, that had been done in the province of Kent, or the adjacent parts, by the disciples of the blessed Pope Gregory, as he had learned the same either from written records, or the traditions of his ancestors. The same Nothelm, afterwards going to Rome, having, with leave of the present Pope Gregory,f searched into the archives of the holy Roman Church, found there some epistles of the blessed Pope Gregory, and other popes ; and returning home, by the advice of the aforesaid most reverend father Albinus, brought them to me, to be in- serted in my history. Thus, from the beginning of tliis volume to the time when the English nation received the faith of Christ, have we collected the writings of our prede- cessors, and from them gathered matter for our history ; but from that time till the present, what was transacted in the Church of Canterbury, by the disciples of St. Gregory or their successors, and under what kings the same happened, has been conveyed to us by Nothelm through the industry of the aforesaid Abbot Albinus. They also partly informed me by what bishops and under what kings the provinces of the East and West Saxons, as also of the East Angles, and of the Northumbrians, received the faith of Christ. In short I was chiefly encouraged to undertake this work by the per- suasions of the same Albinus. In like manner, Daniel, the most reverend Bishop of the AVest Saxons, who is still living, communicated to me in writing some things relating to the Ecclesiastical History of that province, and the next adjoin- • Afterwards Archbisliop of Canterbury, A.r>. 73(). + Gregory the Third, who began to reign, a.d, 731. B. I. PREF.J CUNEBERT CUTHBERT. 3 ing to it of the South Saxons, as also of the Isle of Wight. But how, by the pious ministry of Cedd and Ceadda, the province of the Mercians was brought to the fiiith of Christ, which they knew not before, and how that of the East Saxons recovered the same, after having expelled it, and how those fathers lived and died, we learned from the brethren of the monastery, which was built by them, and is called Lastingham. What ecclesistical transactions took place in the province of the East Angles, was partly made known to us from the writings and tradition of our ancestors, and partly by relation of the most reverend Abbot Esius. What was done towards promoting the faith, and what was the sacerdotal succession in the province of Lindsey, we had either from the letters of the most reverend prelate Cunebert,* or by word of mouth from other persons of good credit. But what was done in the Church throughout the province of the Northumbrians, from the time when they received the faith of Christ till this present, I received not from any particular author, but by the faithful testimony of innumerable wit- nesses, who might know or remember the same ; besides what I had of my own knowledge. Wherein it is to be observed, that what I have written concerning our most holy father, Bishop Cuthbert, either in this volume, or in my treatise on his life and actions, I partly took, and faithfully copied from what I found written of him by the brethren of the Church of Lindisfarne ; f but at the same time took care to add such things as I could myself have knowledge of by the faithful testimony of such as knew him. And I humbly entreat the reader, that if he shall in this that we have written find anything not delivered according to the truth, he will not impute the same to me, who, as the true rule of history re- quires, have laboured sincerely to commit to writing such things as I could gather from common report, for the instruc- tion of posterity. Moreover, I beseech all men who shall hear or read this history of our nation, that for my manifold infirmities both of mind and body, they will offer up frequent supplications * Bishop of Sidnacester, the present see of Lincoln. + Lindisfarne, now called Holy Island, is situated on the north cf North- umberland, in its southern extremity. Here stood a monastery in Bede's time, and it was for four centuries the seat of the present see of Durham. B 2 4 BEDE's ecclesiastical history. Lb. i-c-1. to the tkrone of Grace. And I further pray, that in recom- pense for the labour wherewith I have recorded in the seve- ral countries and cities those events wliich were most worthy 0^ note, and most grateful to the ears of their inhabitants, I may for my reward have the benefit of their pious prayers. CHAP. 1. 0/ the Situation of Britain and Ireland^ and of their ancient inhabitants. Britain, an island in the ocean,* formerly called Albion, is situated between the north and west, facing, though at a considerable distance, the coasts of Germany, France, and Spain, which form the greatest part of Europe. It extends 800 miles in length towards the north, and is 200 miles in breadth, except where several promontories extend further in breadth, by which its compass is made to be 3675 miles.f To the south, as you pass along the nearest shore of the Belgic Gaul, the first place in Britain wliich opens to the eye, is the city of Rutubi Portus, by the English corrupted into Reptacestir.| The distance from hence across the sea to Ges- soriacum,§ the nearest shore of the Morini, is fifty miles, or as some writers say, 450 furlongs. On the back of the island, where it opens upon the boundless ocean, it has the islands called Orcades. Britain excels for grain and trees, and is well adapted for feeding cattle and beasts of burden. It also produces vines in some places, and has plenty of land and water-fowls of several sorts ; it is remarkable also for rivers abounding in fish, and plentiful springs. It has the greatest plenty of salmon and eels ; seals are also frequently taken, and dolphins, as also whales ; besides many sorts of shell-fish, such as muscles, in which are often found excellent * The expression, " an island in the ocean," seems to be used to dis- tinguish Britain from the other islands known to the ancients, almost all of which were in the Mediterranean sea. t This total varies in different authors : some make it 4875. The first few pages of Bede are of not much value, being copied out of Pliny, Soli- nus, and other Roman authors. See the Appendix to my History of the Ancient Britons. X Richborough, Kent. $ Boulogne. B. I. c. I.J BRITAIN — ^ITS PRODUCTIONS. 5 pearls of all colours, red, purple, violet, and green, but mostly white. There is also a great abundance of cockles, of which the scarlet dye is made ; a most beautiful colour, which never fades with the heat of the sun or the washing of the rain ; but the older it is, the more beautiful it becomes. It has both salt and hot springs, and from them flow river which furnish hot baths, proper for all ages and sexes, and arranged according. For water, as St. Basil says, receives the heating quality, when it runs along certain metals, and becomes not only hot but scalding. Britain has also many veins of metals, as copper, iron, lead, and silver ; it has much and excellent jet, which is black and sparkling, glittering at the fire, and when heated, drives away serpents ; being warmed with rubbing, it holds fast whatever is applied to it, like amber. The island was for- merly embellished with twenty-eight noble cities, besides in- numerable castles, which were all strongly secured with walls, towers, gates, and locks. And, from its lying almost under the North Pole, the nights are light in summer, so that at midnight the beholders are often in doubt whether the even- ing twilight still continues, or that of the morning is coming on ; for the sun, in the night, returns under the earth, through the northern regions at no great distance from them. For this reason the days are of a great length in summer, as, on the contrary, the nights are in winter, for the sun then withdraws into the southern parts, so that the nights are eighteen hours long. Thus the nights are extraordinarily short in summer, and the days in winter, that is, of only six equinoctial hours. Whereas, in Ai'menia, Macedonia, Italy, and other countries of the same latitude, the longest day or night extends but to fifteen hours, and the shortest to nine. This island at present, following the number of the books in which the Divine law was written, contains five nations, the English, Britons, Scots,* Picts,| and Latins, each in its * The Scots were the relatives of the Cjinri, being another branch of the great Celtic nation, who, at a period far beyond all authentic history, had established themselves in Hibemia, Erin, or Ireland. Hence that island, from its predominant population, was generally called Scotia, or Insula Scotorum, by the ^mter3 of the sixth and seventh centuries. The name of Scotia, or Scotland, as applied to the northern portion of Britain, is comparatively of modern origin. f The original of the PictSj has caused various opinions. Hector Boe- b BEDE S ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY. Lb. r. c. 1. own peculiar dialect cultivating tlie sublime study of Divine truth. The Latin tongue is, by the study of the Scriptures, become common to all tlie rest. At first this island had no other inhabitants but the Britons, from whom it derived its name, and who, coming over into Britain, as is reported, from Armorica, possessed themselves of the southern parts thereof. When they, beginning at the south, had made themselves masters of the greatest part of the island, it hap- pened, that the nation of the Picts, from Scythia, as is re- ported, putting to sea, in a few long ships, were driven by the winds beyond the shores of Britain, and arrived on the northern coasts of Ireland, where, finding the nation of the Scots, they begged to be allowed to settle among them, but could not succeed in obtaining their request. Ireland is the greatest island next to Britain, and lies to the west of it ; but as it is shorter than Britain to the north, so, on the other hand, it runs out far beyond it to the south, opposite to the northern parts of Spain, though a spacious sea lies between them. The Picts, as has been said, arriving in this island by sea, desired to have a place granted them in which they might settle. The Scots answered that the island could not contain them both ; but " We can give you good advice,** said they, " what to do ; we know there is another island, not far from ours, to the eastward, which we often see at a distance, when the days are clear. If you will go tliither, you will obtain settlements ; or, if they should oppose you, you shall have our assistance." The Picts, accordingly, sail- ing over into Britain, began to inhabit the northern parts thereof, for the Britons were possessed of the southern. Now the Picts liad no wives, and asked them of the Scots ; who would not consent to grant them upon any other terms, than that when any difficulty should arise, they should choose a king from the female royal race rather than from tlie male : wliich custom, as is well known, has been observed among the Picts to this day. In process of time, Britain, besides the Britons and the Picts, received a third nation, the Scots, thius derives them from the Agathyrji, others from the Germans, Bede from Scvthia, and the author of the Saxon Annals from the southern parts of Scythia. ^Ir. Camden is of opinion that tliey were originally Britons, who I'ed into the northern parts of the island from the Roman invasions, as the Welsh into the Avestern. But this is opposed by Bishop Stillingfieet, who w