\.: l|Sf«¥|i3i-f-;r PRINCETON, N. J. \ Division - _P ■j'^ C/ ^ I S-rZ/Vw ... .V. !O^C^^ f Shelf. Number V.*..^... SERMONS, AND MORAL DISCOURSES, ON THE IMPORTANT DUTIES OF CHRISTIANITY. TRANSLATED FROM THE FRENCH OF PERE BOURDALOUE, S.I. BY THE REV. A. CARROLL, S.J. PREACH THE 'WORD : BE INSTANT IN SEASON, OUT OF SEASON ; REPROVE, ENTREAT, BEBDKB IN ALL PATIENCE AND DOCTRINE 2Tim. CiV. V.2. SECOND EDITION. VOL. n. DUBLIN : PUBLISHED BY JAMES DUFFY, 25, ANGLESEA STREET. M.DCCC.XLni. CONTENTS, VOL. II, SERMON XVII On Temptation, 5 [For the first Sunday in Lent.] Jesus was led up hy the spirit into the wilderness, to be tempted by the devil ; and when he had fasted forty days and forty nights, he afterwards ivas hungered. Matth. IV. SERMON XVIIL— On Relapse into Sin, - - - - 29 [For the eighteenth Sunday after Pentecost.] Jesus seeing their faith, said to the man sick of the palsy : be of good heart, S07i, thy sins are forgiven thee. Matth. ix. SERMON XIX — On Divine Grace, 51 Jesus answered, and said to her : if thou didst know the gift of God. John iv SERMON XX — On Remorse of Conscience, - - - 74 When Jesus came near Jerusalem, he beheld the city, and wept over it, saying : if thou hadst known, even then, the tlmigs belonging to thy peace ! Luke xix. SERMON XXI On the Love of God, .... 95 This he spake of the spirit which they who believe in him should receive. John vii. SERMON XXII — On Penance, 1 IG He came into all the country about the Jordan, preaching the baptism of penance, unto the remission of sins. Luke hi. SERMON XXIII._On Communion, 137 [For the third Sunday after Epiphany.] Jesus saith unto him : I will come and heal him. And the centurion answered and said : Lord, I am not worthy that thou shouldst come tinder my roof. Matth. viii. SERMON XXI v.— On Prayer, 162 Behold a woman of Canaan, who came out of the coasts, saying : have mercy on me, O Lord, the son of David f my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil. Matth. xv. SERMON XXV — On THE Thoughts OF Death, - - 184 Dust thou art, and unto dust ihnn shalt return. Gen. lit. IV CONTENTS, VOL. II. SERMON XXVI On Preparation for Death, - - 2.08 [For the fifteenth Sunday after Pentecost.] When he came near unto the gate of the city, behold, there was a dead man carried out, the only son of his mother; and she was a widow, and many people of the city were with her. And when the Lord saw her, being moved with compassion, he said unto her, weep not. Luke vii. SERMON XXVII On Final Impenitence, - - - 228 Jesus said unto them ; / go, and ye shall seek me ; and shall die in your sin. John viii. SERMON XXVIII On the Last Jud(1ment, - - - 247 [For the first Sunday of Advent.] There shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars, and upon the earth distress of nations .... Men withering away for fear and ex- pectation of what shall come upon the whole world. Luke xxi. SERMON XXIX.— On the Pains of Hell, - - - 269 The rich man also died, and was buried j;i Hell. Luke xvi. SERMON XXX On the Eternity OP Hell, - - - 291 The7i the king said to the waiters: bind him hand and foot, ajtd cast him into outer darkness. There shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. Matth. xxii. SERMON XXXI On the Reward of the Saints - - 315 [For the Feast of All Saints.] Rejoice and be exceeding glad, for lo ! your reward is very great in heaven. Matth. v. 1 1 >- u . I K u V I r j i SERMONS. SERMON XVII. ON TEMPTATION. 'For the First Sunday in Lent. *' Jesus was led up hy the Spirit into the wilderness^ to he tempted by the devil ; and when he had fasted forty days and forty nights, he afterwards was hungered." Matt. iv. Ib it not astonishing, beloved Christians, that the Son of God, who came down upon earth, (as St. John tells us,) with a view to over- turn the works of Satan, should condescend to 'experience in his own person the assaults and wiles of that ghostly tempter ? But to this he was induced, (as St. Augustin observes,) for four great reasons, every one of which had a direct tendency to promote our welfare. We were too frail and weak to undergo temptation, and he would supply us with strength. We were too timid and das- tardly, and he would inspire us with courage. We were too imprudent and rash, and he would teach us to be cautious. We wanted experience, and were little versed in the art of withstanding the art of our common enemy, and he would instruct us in it. Now this he doth admirably in the passage I have quoted. For, (according to the thought and expression of St. Gregory,) he supphed us with strength to overcome temptations, by his o^vn temptations, as by his own death he overcame ours. He inspired us with courage and resolution, by sharing the same combat, as nothing covUd encourage us more effectually than the example of a God-man, our Sovereign Pontiff, who was (according to St. Paul's words) "in all points tempted, like as we were." Ileb. iv. VOL. 11. B 6 ON TEMI'TATION. He taught us vigilance and circumspection, by showing U8 that no one should hold himself secure ; since he himself, tlie saint of saints, was liable to be tempted. He gave us knowledge and understanding, by discovering the arms we ought to make use of in our own defence, and by laying down the rules which were to be observed in this spiritual warfare. Thus a great prince, to repulse his enemies, and disconcert their measures, is not content with levying forces, and issuing out orders, but puts himself the first at the head of his armies, encourages them by his presence, leads them on by his prudence, animates them by his valour, and, notwithstanding the obstacles and dan- gers they meet with, makes them sure of victory. And if such be the efficacy, such the prevalence of royal example, as you well know, Christians, and of which you have been witnesses oftentimes yourselves, what must be that of a saving God ? This is, undoubt- edly, one of the most important subjects I can treat of, or discuss in the pulpit ; a subject, than which none requires more attention, or deeper reflection. Among so great a nimiber of excellent lessons which the gospel lays down in the present narrative, con- cerning the manner in which it is our duty to behave in temptation, I shall suigle out two, to which I shall confine myself, and which naturally arise from the words of my text. The first is, that this divine Master goes not into the wilderness, where he suffers temp- tation, but by the suggestion and guidance of the holy Spirit : *' Led up by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted." The second, that before he is tempted, he prej^ares for it by fasting, and by mortifying the senses : " And when he had fasted forty days and forty nights, the tempter came to him." And from hence I shall make two deductions, both the one and the other extremely profitable, and no less necessary. In Avhat manner soever, God, by the decrees of his infinite wis- dom, may have previously appointed the disposition of his graces, which St. Augustin denominates, predestination, these three things are evident and incontestable in the principles of faith, namely ; that the assistance of grace is necessary, in order to overcome temptation ; that there is no temptation which may not be over- come by the assistance of grace ; and finally, that God, by an engagement of fidelity, never fails to strengthen us with grace in temptation. 1 cannot, without grace, overcome temptation. This is an ON TEMPTATION. 7 article long since decided against the Pelagians. Now when I say overcome, I mean that victory of which St. Paul speaks, when he Bays, "that a man is not crowned, except he strive lawfully." 2 Tim. ii. A victory which results from the spirit of Christianity; a victory meritorious in the sight of God ; a victory for which the conqueror shall one day be rewarded in heaven. For, to subdue one temptation by another temptation, one vice by another vice, one sin by another sin ; to subdue revenge by avarice, avarice by pleasure, pleasure by ambition : these are the \'irtues and victories of the world, in which grace hath no share. But to siumouut, for God, and righteousness' sake, all these temptations, and the world itself, is a victory peculiar to grace and our faith : " And this is the victory which overcometh the world, our faith." 1 John v. There is no temptation which is not surmountable yviih God's assistance ; this is another essential maxim in religion, for which St. John assigns an excellent reason ; for (says he) " greater is he who is in you [by his grace] than he who is in the world," (1 John iv.) and reigns in it in quality of prince of the world. It is to offer an injury to God, therefore, to suppose, that temptations cannot be surmounted, and to say, what nevertheless is so often said : I cannot bear up against such a passion; I cannot make head against such a custom, and such a propensity. There is more of infidelity (according to St. Bernard,) than of weakness in expressions of this nature ; because, by thus speaking, either we consider only our own strength, and, in that sense, indeed, the proposition is true • but we are faithless in separating our oAvn strength from that of God ; or we suppose grace, and the divine assistance ; and in that sense, the proposition is not only false, but, moreover, heretical • because faith teaches, that " we can do all things throuo-h Jesus Christ our Lord, who strengthens us." Phil. iv. But have we always this assistance of God in temptation ? This is that which remains to be explained, and wliich I purpose to make the subject of the following discom-se, in wliich I fear not to promise, that I shall, without embarrassing the imagination, or con- fusing the mind, or advancing aught but what will edify you, throw light upon wdiatever is most important and sohd rclatinrr to grace. Yes, beloved Cluistians, it is an article of our faith, that God, at no time, pei'mits us to be tempted above our strength : " God is faithful, who will not suffer you to be tempted above that Avhich b2 ON TEMrXATION. you are able." 1 Cor. x. Now this ability we have only through gmce, wliich, therefore, is never wanting on the part of God, not only to repel, but to draw advantage from, the sallies of temp- tation : for *' he will make vnth the temptation a way to escape." 1 Cor. X. This is the doctrine of the great apostle, and this we cannot doubt of, unless we preposterously figure to ourselves a supreme Being without mercy and without Providence. But how true soever all this may be, there is still a mistake but too common in the world, and discoverable in the greater part of mankind ; it is to suppose that these graces are imparted to us, such as we would have them, and at the time we would have them be imparted to us : a gross mistake, the consequences of which are extremely perni- cious, and whicli I look upon as of the utmost importance to rectify. In order to lay my plan the more clearly before you, I must here distinguish between two sorts of temptations : one, in which we engage against the order of God, and of our own accord ; the other, in which we are overtaken by a kind of necessity annexed to our condition. First then, I say, that when temptation is voluntary, we expect to no purpose the assistance of God, if we do not quit the occasion of it ; nor must we then promise ourselves the grace to resist it, but the grace to fly from it. Secondly, I say, that though temptation be involuntary, we shall have to no purpose the grace of resistance, if we be not^ ourselves, resolved to resist it, particularly in imitation of our blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, by mortifying the flesh. Both these propositions abound with solid instruction, and are well deserving of your serious attention. Part I. AVliatever obligation we may sometimes be under, as in fact we are, of risking our lives, it is an incontestable truth, fomided in that primary law of charity which we owe to ourselves, that we are never permitted to venture our salvation. Now, it is evident that we do so, and therefore, that we sin as often as we rashly engage In temptation. My meaning is this : there is no one who hath not, internally and externally, originals of temptation peculiar to himself : internally, passions and habits ; externally, opportunities and importunities, which lie must personally guard against, and which are sources of temptation in his regard. For with great propriety we may say of temptation, what St. Paul said ol" grace : thjit as there is in us a diversity of graces and inspira- ON TEMPTATION. 9 tions, all which proceed from one and the same spirit of sanctity, and which Almighty God, who operates in us, makes use oi", though differently, in order to convert us and bring us to salvation ; 60 also there is in us a diversity of temptations, which one and the same spirit of iniquity raises up against us, in order to corrupt us, and lead us to perdition. We are sufficiently apprised what that foible is, tlu-ough which he mostly, and most vehemently attacks us ; and if we give but ever so little attention to our o\\ai conduct, we easily discern, not only the temptation which predominates in us, but the particular circumstances which enhance the danger of it. For (as St. Chrysostom judiciously ^remarks) what is temp- tation for one man, is not so for another ; what may be the occasion of one man's fall, may be no way dangerous with regard to another ; and many there are, who, though firm and unshaken amidst the most enormous scandals in the world, yet, on account of the particular disposition they are in, unhappily miscarry for (if I may 80 call it) the veriest trifle. To know the danger, and not to fly from it, is what I call exposing one's self, against the order of God, to temptation. Now I maintain, that a Christian should not then expect the assistance of those graces, which are given him to resist and overcome temptation. I maintain that he hath no right to petition, or even to hope for them. I proceed still farther, nor am I afraid to add, that although he should petition for them, God, in the ordinary course of his Providence, is expressly determined to give him a denial. How can I address myself in stronger terms to those presumptuous souls, in order to let them see the irregu- larity of their conduct, and induce them to come back into the prudential and holy ways of righteousness ? No, Christians ; whoever inadvisedly, and against God's order, rushes into temptation, must not hope for those graces of protec- tion and defence, of resistance and conflict, so necessary to support us. Under what colour can we ask them of God ? Under colour of justice ? No, they would no longer be graces, or gifts of God, if God owed them as a debt. Under colom- of fidelity ? No, God never promised them. Under colour of mercy ? To that, by his presumption, he puts a voluntary obstacle, and renders himself unworthy of the divine mercies. He is, therefore, so long as he remains in this state, and is willing to remain in it, destitute of help on the part of God, and deprived of all right and title to grace ; I mean that grace of which St. Augustin speaks, and wliich he 10 ON TEMPTATION. styles victorious, inasmuch as it is by it that we vanquish temp- tation. I say more : not only we must not on ihese occasions presume, or suppose that God will afford us his victorious grace ; we must be assured he will not, because he hath so declared, and because no doctrine is more clearly set forth in the scripture than this, namely ; that to punish the rashness and presumption of a sinner, God abandons him, and gives him up to his corrupt desires. And tell me not, that God is faithful to his promise, and that his pro- mise is (according to St. Paul) not to suffer us to be tempted above that which we are able. God is faithful to his promise ; but these are two very different things : not to suffer us to be tempted above that which we are able, and to give us what degree of ability we please, whenever we throw ourselves into temptation. One is by no means a consequence of the other ; and God may refuse us, without prejudice to his promise, a favour for which we cannot reasonably hope. He is faithful to his promise ; but when, or where, hath he promised to succour the man in temptation who seeks the temptation ? To reason with propriety, and on the prin- ciples of faith, we would invert the proposition, and conclude in this manner : God is faitliful to his promise, nay, infallible in his words ; he will, therefore, refuse to aid him in temptation, because he hath so told us in express terms. Now it is as much the con- cernment of God's fidelity as to make good the truth of tliia formidable threat : " He that loveth the danger shall perish in it ;" (Ecclus. iii.;) as it is to fulfil tliis comfortable promise ; " God is faithful, who will not sufier you to be tempted above that which you are able." I Cor. x. But waving the promises and menaces of God, let us consider the thing as it is in itself. Why, truly, beloved hearers, if a man should rashly, and of his own accord, run into temptation, and should voluntarily harbom- the cause and origin of it, how doth it become him to implore and expect the assistance of heaven ? But had it been the desire of promoting the greater glory of God, or a necessaiy obHgation, or a charitable motive, or accident, or surprise, that induced you to take this dangerous step, his Providence had watched over you, and had sooner worked a miracle, than suffered you to fall. And, indeed, when Christian virgins, in the days of persecution, were committed to places of prostitution and debauch- ery, with a vicAV to ruin them, the grace of God went after them. ON TEMPTATION. 11 ^V^lcn the prophets of Israel, to fulfil their duty, appeared In the courts of idolatrous princes, the grace of God accompanied them. When the fathers of the desert, in obedience to the call and Inspi- ration of God, relinquished their retreats, and repaired to infamous dissolute towns, to exhort the people and reclaim them to penance, the grace of God went along with them. It acted within them, and impelled them to action. It gmned illustrious victories, and made glorious conquests. And because he was himself the guar- dian of their way, and ensurancer of their salvation, they were proof against every thing. But you, upon principles extremely different, give yourselves up to whatever is most dangerous for you, and most capable to pervert you. With a view of satisfying your evil propensity, you are taken up with loose friends, loose com- pany, and loose conversation, that would corrupt (if I may venture 80 to speak) the angels themselves. With a view of indulging in some favourite passion, or influenced by weakness and vicious duc- tility, you give free admittance to contagious persons, domestic demons, who perpetually watch for an opportunity of seducing you, and instilling into you the seductive poison which they carry in their breasts. With a view of procuring insignificant pleasure, you run to exhibitions, and are seen at assemblies, which are capable of mortally wounding your heart. With a view of gratifying a hellish curiosity, you devour books without discrimination, not scrupling to peruse even those which have a du'eet tendency to debauch the imagination by lascivious narratives, and amorous adventures ; or to pervert the understanding by their impious principles, and scoffs at rehgion. And you, woman of the world, through an imfortu- nate vanity, peculiar to your sex, do everything in your power to appear at all places of public resort, to attract admiration, to sec and be seen, to shine in company, to set yourself off with all the advantages of an affected luxury ; and in this disposition you have tlie presumption to expect that God, in his goodness, will support and protect you- Now I say, on the contraiy, that he ivill with- draw his arm, that he will suffer you to fall ; and tliat although from motives of Avorldly prudence, you should avoid those crimes, which in the eyes of the world itself are accounted abominable, yet you will fall into others of not so deep a dye, but mortal, never- theless, with regard to salvation. I say that those graces, on which you ridiculously build your hopes, were not intended to confirm resolution in such circumstances, and that you may despair of 12 ON TEMPTATION. obtaining them, while your life is so disorderly as 1 suppose it to be. This is what I advance as a maxim the most incontestable, and the most solidly authorised by the three great rules of moral agency, namely ; by experience, by reason, and by faith. This is the great, the capital point, which 'you and I must invariably adhere to through our whole conduct and plan of life. Ah 1 my brethren (says the pious St. Bernard) were it true, as you would persuade yourselves, that God was disposed to protect and uphold us, as weU when we throw ourselves against his order into the danger of sinning, as when we are innocently surprised, we must admit that the saints took wrong measures and needless precautions on this head. Those men, so reno\viied for the sanc- tity of their lives, and who are proposed for our imitation ; those men, so consummately skilled in the science of salvation, would have understood it but ill, if grace had been indifferently imparted to him wlio courted the temptation, and to him who feared it ; to him who excites it and takes delight in it, and to him who avoids it. In vain should you break off all communication with the world, and shut yourselves up in holy retirement, if, in the most corrupt communication wth the world, you might make sure of God and his all-powerful protection. Why had St. Jerom so great a horror of worldly pomp ? Why was he disturbed, as he witnesses himself, at the remembrance of things which he had seen at Rome ? He might have quitted his solitude, and joined once more his former associates. He might, without fear, have resorted to, and indulged in all the softness and effeminacy of female conversation. Why did this great, this cele- brated master in a spiritual life, this doctor of the church, so wise and so enlightened, oblige that holy virgin, Eustochium, to refrain for eVer from certain liberties, which are mostly taken without scruple ; concealed appointments, frequent visits, ambiguous words and of double meaning ; humorous letters and artfully obscure ; professions of affection, and all the formalities of a growing friend- ship ? Why, I say, did he rebuke her for all these, as for so many crimes ? Why did he make her so much apprehend the consequences of them, if he knew that God had taken care to provide J us with an infallible preservative, and a never-failing remedy always at hand ? In fine, when the fathers of the church so zealously inveighed against the abuses and scandals of theatrical cxliibitions ; when they ON TEMPTATION. 13 obliged the faithful to renounce them for ever, in consequence of their baptism, those vehement invectives we should regard as figures, and those pathetic discourses as exaggerations. But think what you will of it, beloved hearers, it is hard that the saints should have been all deceived ; and in matters of conscience I had rather be impelled by their example, than be influenced by the world and all its adherents. For, the saints spoke and acted by the spirit of God ; and error ever was, and will bo incompatible with the Spirit of God. But let us proceed to the fountain-head ; and in order to ascer- tain still more fully the truth of this doctrine, let us try to make appear from what soiu-ce it flows. Why doth not God give his grace to a sinner who lays himself voluntarily open to temptation? To promote the advantage and credit of his grace. And for tliis Tertullian gives a very natural and very solid reason. The aid (says he) of the Deity, in any other supposition, would be a foun- dation and pretext for the rashness of. man. This, then, is the meaning of that father : Almighty God, liberal and boimtiliil as he is, must in such a manner dispose of his graces, that they make us not live in a presumptuous confidence. This proposition is clear and evident. Now did I know, that in the temptations to wliich I expose myself against his will, he would infallibly assist me, I should not imagine circumspection needful ; I should slight liis counsels, and overlook the dictates of Chiistian prudence, equally invincible, whether I sought or avoided the danger. And thus, instead of making me watchful and humble, the influence of God would make me proud and remiss. What then doth God do ? Seeing me prepossessed with an error so injurious to his very sanctity, he deprives me of his grace, and obviates the reproach which might be made to his Providence : that he had countenanced my libertinism, and authorized my tirae- rity. It is a great mistake (says St. Cyprian) to imagine, that the spiritual force and power of grace, which ought to overcome temp- tation in us, or help us to overcome it, is left to omr discretion. God keeps it in store for the wise and provident, not for the negli- gent and inconsiderate Christian, imparting it only to righteous souls, who know their o^vn weakness, and are perpetually on their guard. But as to those audacious, precipitate Christians, who go on without reflection in their evil courses, he makes a point of leaving them to the desiies of their own heart. And this chastise- 14 ON TEMPTATION. ment, however terrible, is perfectly commensurate witli the nature of their sin. For, what doth a Christian do, when the instigation and capri- eiousness of a ruling power neither alarm him, nor induce him to prevent temptation ? He tempts God : and to tempt God is one of the greatest and most hateful inordinations of which man is capable ; an inordination which (according to the fathers) offends directly against the first duty of the Christian rehgion : " Thou ehalt not tempt the Lord thy God." Matt. iv. Now for this the einner can undergo no punishment more severe, than that of God's dereliction. Hear how St. Thomas reasons upon the matter. In the language of scripture (says he) God may be tempted three several ways : first, when we desire that he would work a miracle without necessity ; and this is the case of those Pharisees mentioned in St. Luke : " Others, tempting him, sought of him a sign from heaven." Luke xi. They asked him to show them a prodigy in the air. But what was their view in making this petition ? It was to tempt him. Secondly, when we try to set bounds to his omni- potence ; and with this it was that the amiable Judith reproached the Bethulians, who, when besieged by Holofemes, despairing too soon of succour from above, were ready to capitulate, and deliver themselves up : " Who are you, (says she) that tempt the Lord?" Jud. viii. " You have a set time for his mercy." Lastly, when we are false to him, not maintaining an open, upright conduct towards liim. Thus, the Jews perfidiously presented a piece of coin to Christ, and wished him to tell them, if it were expedient they should pay tribute to C»sar. " Why tempt ye me, (answers he,) ye hypocrites ?" Matt. xxi. In this manner (says St. Thomas) is God tempted ; these are the three difierent branches of tliis sin. A Christian, who, presumptuously relying on grace, throws himself into temptation, is guilty at once of all these three different kinds of sin. For, first, he desires a miracle of God without neces- sity ; because, doing nothing for his own preservation, he expects that God will, alone, preserve him ; and, not making use of the grace he hath, hopes that God will supply him with the grace he hath not. The grace he hath, is a grace of flight ; but he will not fly. The grace he hath not, is a grace of conflict ; but reckoning nevertheless, that God will combat for him, he faces the danf^er ; that is, he subverts, or at least would subvert, all the laws of Pro- vidence. Regvdarly he should withdraw from the occasion of ON TEMPTATION. 15 einning, because it is in his power; but he will not. Ho presumes, however, that God will protect him, and by an extraordinary con- currence, withhold him from perdition. Is not this to desire a most needless miracle ? When God was for preserving Lot and his family from the flames of Sodom, and ordered him to leave that reprobated tosvn, had he refused the condition, and chosen to remain in the midst of the flames, still imploring the miraculous interpo- sition of heaven, how would, how should, the petition have been received ? Now this expressly sets forth the nature of our daily conduct. We want, in places where the fire of concupiscence is lighted up on all sides, that God Avould enable us, by his special grace, to escape its influence. We go into all places, we hear and see everything, we dread no connexions, we make but slight reflec- tions on our own weakness ; and yet we expect that God will shield us against so many dangers, and make us invulnerable to so many shafts. But God can find means of keeping us to Jorder, and baffling our presumption ; for he says to us directly what he said to Lot : " Stay not in the country all about." Gen. ix. Stay not in Sodom, or in the adjacent places ; stay not in the company of wicked men, in evil communication, in scenes of debauchery : I will work no miracle on your account : I consent, from this moment, to your eternal ruin, unless by a vnse and speedy retreat you prevent the misfortune that hangs over and threatens you. *' Stay not in the country all about." Accordingly, Christians, it is very remarkable, that the Son of God, who might easily have accepted the challenge given him by the tempter in the gospel ; Avho, without hazard, might have cast himself down from the top of the pinnacle, and, by so doing, have put his enemy to shame, was content to repulse him with these words : " Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God." And at this (says St. Augustin) we must not be sui-prised, because this enemy of our happiness must be foiled by the vigilance of man, and not by a miracle of God's omnipotence. To hear the holy fathers deliver their sentiments on this head, one would think that they had adopted the doctrine of Pelagius. All their propositions, how- ever, are orthodox, as they exclude not grace, but the miracle of grace. And it was this that made the saints so timorous, so cautious, so attentive to themselves. But we, more knowing in the dispensations of God than God himself^ carry our aflSance in his divine protection to a liigher degree. For the father of lies says ; 16 ON TEMPTATION. "Cast yourselves down;" (Matt. iv;) throw yourselves, fearless, into this abyss ; visit this person ; keep up this connexion : "he hath given his angels charge concerning you." Matt. iv. Thus he speaks to us, thus we hearken to him, thus we persuade our- selves, that the angels of heaven will come down to oiu* assistance : I mean, that we shall feel the influence of divine grace. And forthwith, we shut our eyes, in order to proceed in slippery paths with greater confidence ; and instead of answering, like Christ our Lord : " thou shalt not tempt," thou shalt not make trial of God's omnipotence, without hesitation we leave all to chance ; we expect that God will do that for us, which he would not do for his divine Son ; we ask of him a miracle, which (if I may venture to use the expression) he refuses himself. Further : at the same time that the sinner presumes to tempt God, with regard to his omnipotence, he hath the boldness to tempt him with regard to his mercy ; not by setting bounds to it, like the priests'of Bethulia, but by extending it, on the contrary, beyond the limits which he himself hath prescribed. For, his mercy (says St. Augustin) is only stored for those who are taken in the toils of temptation against their will ; and yet we would have it be granted to those who entangle themselves in it, who make it familiar to them, who love, and are pleased with its destructive snares ; as if we were masters of God's graces, and had it in our power to dispose of them at pleasure. " Now who are we, therefore, who tempt the Lord ?" In fine, we tempt God by hypocrisy, when we implore his assisting grace in temptation, from which we are still afraid to be delivered, and which we refuse to banish. God might well answer us as Christ did the Jews : " Why tempt ye me, ye hypocrites?" Matt. xxii. For we ask him for one thing with our lips, while in our mind, and in our hearts, we desire another. We beg of him to withdraw us and screen us from temptation, while yet we approach against his prohibition. We say. Lord ! cast an eye of compassion on our weakness, and save us from the violence and surprises of the tempter ; and, notwithstanding this, by a mon- strous contradiction, wc become our own tempters. We perform in ourselves, and against ourselves (as St. Gregory, pope, excel- lently observes,) a diabolical agency. Tell me, is not this to dissemble with God, and to offer him insult ? , This, beloved heai'ers, (give me leave to apply it to you in a ON TEMPTATION. 17 particular manner) avIII make you eternally inexcusable in the pre- sence of God. When we reproach you with faults, you allege for excuse your situation in life, pretending that the court, at which you reside, is the abode of inevitable, insurmountable temptations. It is thus you discourse, and thus you ascribe to other causes, that which takes its rise in your own breasts. But the ways of God must be justified in a matter, in which his Providence is so nearly concerned. This idle pretext being once exploded, you will be necessitated to hold another language, and humbly to acknowledge the iiTCgularity of your conduct. Yes, Christians, I own it is at court, that temptations have taken up their fixed habitation ; allm-ing temptations which can scarce be resisted ; vehement temptations, to wliich the most reso- lute are often wont to yield. But for whom are they such ? For those who do not come there by the call of God ; for those who are instigated by ambitious views ; for those who endeavour to advance by intrigue ; for those who seek only to make a worldly fortune ; for those who remain there contrary to their duty, profession, and conscience ; for those who are asked, what they do, and what they came for ; for those of whom it is said, they are there but shoidd be elsewhere ; in a word, for those who are not led by the Spirit of God. Are you of this character, and in this category ? Then I agree that you will suffer shipwreck almost infallibly. It is an impetuous tide that bears you away. For how can you stem it, since God is not with you ? But are you stationed at court, in the order of Providence ? That is, have you fixed your abode there by the divine appointment ? Do you hold the rank there that is given you by your biilh ? Are you there by office ? Were you summoned there by your sovereign? Do you stay there for a necessary and indispensable reason ? No, Christians, the temptations of the court are no longer invincible temptations for you. For, it is an article of" faith, not only that God had pre- viously afforded you graces to overcome them, but the graces wliich he affords you have a peculiar fitness to bring about your sanctification in the very midst of the court. If then your perdition be effected at court, attribute not your misfortune to the many temptations which at court are unavoidable, but to yourself, and to your infidelity, and to your want of reso- lution, as the Holy Ghost tells you in express terms : " Thou hast destroyed thyself." Osce xiii. And truly is it not at the courts of 18 OM TEMPTATION. princes, tliat, in every age, in epite of temptations, the greatest virtues have been practised, the greatest victories have been obtained, the greatest sanctity hath been acquired, and may still be acquired ? In places equally laborious and honourable, to be perpetually beset with selfish, invidious, insatiable men ; to spend days and nights in examining and adjusting the affairs of others, in hearing complaints, in giving out orders, in holding councils, in negociation, in deliberation, all these, and a thousand other irksome affairs, undertaken with a view of pleasing the sovereign Lord of all things, are means suflScent for raising you to a sublime degree of hoHness. But whence oftentimes doth the evil flow ? From this, that at court, where you are engaged by duty, you proceed considerably beyond your duty. For, do you reckon it a duty to bestir yourself 80 much ? To be concerned in so many private designs ? To form so many schemes ? To waste away with vexation ? To draw upon yourself so many differences and quarrels ? To let yourself so often be inwardly disturbed ? To indulge yom'self with so many needless curiosities ? To meddle officiously with so many affairs ? To run up and down in quest of divertisements ? But let us be more particular on this head, and let us go on a httle farther. Do you think such and such a connexion yom* duty — a connexion of which passion is the only link, and which you ought to break ? So great assiduity in your attendance on an object, with which you sympathize, and from which you should separate ? I cannot do it, say you. You cannot do it I But I maintain that you can ; yes, I maintain, that by so saying you tell a lie to the Holy Ghost, and commit against his grace a grievous outrao-e. Have you a mind that I should convince you of it, and in a clear and obvious manner, too, so clear and obvious, as to make you dlow, that hbertinism itself hath nothing to oppose ? It is not to shame you, but to instruct you as my brethren, whose salvation is dearer to me than my very life. The disposition you are in is favourable to me, and the Lord hath inspu'ed me to diuw advantao-e from it. It suppHes me with a strong, cogent reason, which you little expected, and which will be sufficient for your condemnation, if you make it not, to-day, the motive of your conversion. Be attentive, and judge. There arc some among you (and I pray God they be not the greater number) who, at the time of my speaking, are actually ON TEMPTATIOW. ' 19 engaged iu sinful courses : so strongly, so closely engaged, as to aver they despair of ever being able to break their chains. To beg of them for the sake of their souls' salvation, not to see such a person, they say, would be to beg of them an impossibility. But were the service of our sovereign, on a ready obedience to whom we plume ourselves, to summon them away, would this separation be accounted impossible ? I will be Avitnessed by themselves. Is there one of them all, who, in order to give proof of his loyalty and zeal, is not ready at this moment to set out and leave the object of his tenderest affection behind ? When the rumour of war begins first to spread, each offers his ser\ace, each thinks of going forth to meet the enemy. He is detained by no tie ; he is hurt by no absence, and is determined to manfully disregard its irksomeness. Did I call this in question, you woidd take offence at it ; and now that I lay it down as an undoubted truth, it passes for an eulogy, and you are pleased with my words. I make no comparison between what is requu*ed of you by worldly maxims, and what you are commanded by the law of God. I know that by followin"- the maxims of the world, you preserve in your hearts the same passion wliich it is incumbent on you to renounce for God. And, indeed, it is but just that there be a wide distance between the one and the other, and that I do more for God, who reigns in heaven, than for all the powers who rule the earth. But thence I infer only, that you tell God an untruth, when you boldly assert, that it is not in yom* power to relinquish the person who causes or occa- sions your evil doings ; and, in order to try yourself, to abstain for some time from her presence and conversation. For I ask you again, ■will this be a hinderance, when honour shall call yon ? With what speed shall we see you running, flying to arms, on the first intimation of his majesty's orders ? How happy will you be in your own estimation ! What transports will you leel on receiving the intelhgence! Whoever should hesitate a single moment, would he deserve to live ? Would he dare to show his flvce ? Would he not be the scorn, the sport and mockery of mankind ? Ah ! Christians, let us own the truth ; we have too much infxinged, nay, too much disparaged, the rights of God. If the service of man be the things we are about, we hold ourselves tied to every engagement : everytliing is sacrificed ; and so it ought to be, as it perfectly concords with the order of God. But if the cause of God be the point in hand, everything is an obstacle ; it ia 20 ON TEMPTATION. flanked by difficultiea that crowd on all sides, and our courage fails ua in endeavouring to surmount them. Even those who should oppose this decay of morals, the priests of Jesus Christ, for all their zeal, are led into error by false pretexts, with a view to moderate the rigour of their decisions. They hearken to a worldling ; they respect his judgment in a more than ordinary manner ; they allow him time ; they say that the occasion that he is in of sinning, is involuntary, though proximate, as he came to relinquish it without prejudice to his honour ; and, worldling as he is, they leave it in his breast to determine whether his honour be engaged, and suffi- ciently to countervail that of God. They are desirous that he should remain in this occasion, or that at least they should not be under a necessity of obliging him to quit it, as he cannot, it is supposed, quit it without spiritual detriment to himself; and they refer to himself, and to his own judgment, or rather to his passion and to his self-love, what is best to be done in it. They collect together, for fear of disheartening him, whatever opinions of moral divines seem to favour his case : that is, they authorize his error, they foment his libertinism, they bring him to damnation, and damn themselves with him. For I now come back to my first proposition. In vain do we expect the grace of resistance, to over- come temptation, when temptation is volimtary, and it depends on ourselves to avoid it by flight. In vain shall we have this grace of resistance, in involuntary temptations, if we be not om'selvea disposed to resist them, especially in imitation of Christ our Lord, by mortifying the flesh, as I am going to make appear in the second part. Part II. In order to understand my second proposition, be pleased to presuppose that necessary principle, on which, as I may say, is hinged the whole mystery of man's predestination, and which at the opening of this discourse I have already developed in some measure ; but which will appear more nobly conceived, and more strongly expressed, in these remarkable words of St. Cyprian : *' The virtue of the holy Spirit is not imparted to us by our own choice, but by the divine appointment." That is, the grace of God is not given us according to our own choice, much less according to our fancy, or inclination, but by a certain rule, which God hath estabUshed, and which, if we swerve from it, Avill be useless and ineffectual. From this principle I shall draw three consequences ; consequences extended almost to infinitude, through ON TEMPTATION. 21 our moral obligations, and which, being applied to our conduct in life, are the means to be observed in the several duties we are bound to fulfil, in order to answer the will of God, toward effecting that important work, salvation. I beseech you be attentive to the material doctrines I am going to deliver. The first consequence : in the temptations and dangers to which we are exposed, through the weakness of human nature, God Almighty, whose fidelity is never wanting, is always ready to assist us Avith his grace ; but he requires that we use it conformably to the state to which he hath called us, and to the end for which it was bestowed upon us. For, this is directly what St. Cyprian meant, when he said, that it " was not given us by our OAvn choice, but by the divine appointment." Now you know, beloved hearers, that in quality of Christians, we all make profession of being soldiers of Christ ; and among us there Is not a single person, who is not Impressed with that sacred character. Whence It follows, that our whole life, as the scripture witnesses, must be a continual war of the spirit against the flesh, of reason against the passions, of the Interior man against the exterior man ; In short, of ourselves, against ourselves. And if we truly aspire to the glory of Cluis- tlanlty, which consists only of solid virtues, St. Paul, who was raised up by God to teach It to us, and give us of it a just and adequate idea, seems constantly to conceive It under a military form. For, using a metaphor, which Ave should hold In veneration, as the Holy Ghost himself is the author of It, he mentions the buckler of faith, the breastplate of justice, the helmet of hope ; and in a thousand places of his divine epistles, he encourages us to put on this spiritual armour of God, and makes us understand, that we are bound to make use of It, and that without It, whatever we possess which Is good, or we presume Is good in us, is an airy phantom, a mere Illusion. In this situation we all of us are. What doth God on his part do ? He applies his holy grace to us ; gi'ace proportioned to this situation. We have a dIflScult and dangerous war to carry on : he gives us his grace, not such as he gave to the first man, for that would be unsuitable ; but the grace of conflict, of defence, of attack, of resistance ; forasmuch as none but such are suitable. Temptations are the assaults which the enemy makes upon us, and grace is the means by which he is repulsed. Consequently, to put trust and confidence in grace, and not be determined to resist and to fight, is to forget wliat we are, VOL. 11. c 22 ON TEMPTATION. to entertain chimerical notions of grace, and to render the %'iew3 of God abortive. This, however, is a common practice ; and may heaven grant that it may be not om-s ! We are desirous of gmces that may guard us against dangers of every kind ; but we would have them be such as would cost us nothing, as would give us no trouble, as would leave us in possession of a peaceable, quiet, agree- able life. But God will have his graces be such as shall stir us vip, and press us on to action, and shall oblige us to persist in sub- jection to a labourious and uninterrupted application ; for " the virtue of the Holy Spirit is not imparted to us by our own choice, but by the divine appointment." By many well-meaning, virtuous persons, seduced by self-love, a quiet life is wished for and sought, even from pious motives. But I (says Jesus Christ) disavow this sluggishness, because nothing is more opposite to the spirit of my gospel, and because it is by violence that my kingdom is borne away. It was with this view that I entered, as your leader, the field of battle : " For I came not to send peace, but the sword." Matt. X. This is an obvious and convincing testimony, that he requires his followers should be courageous souls, indefatigable men, and always in a condition to gain fresh victories. Peace and tran- quillity are peculiar to heaven : on earth, our portion is war and disturbance : "I came not to send peace, but the sword." The second consequence : the first maxim in war is, to harrass, as much as possible, and weaken the enemy. This stands to rea- son, as moderation and indulgence would lead, inevitably, to ruin and destruction. Now, Christians, which is the enemy, the most powerful enemy that 'grace hath to combat with ? Let us not deceive ourselves, but humbly acknowledge it in the presence of God : it is our flesh, that flesh of sin ; that flesh which only con- ceives criminal desires ; that flesh, a slave to libidinous affections ; that flesh uninterruptedly an enemy to God. This is the enemy (according to the apostle) the most to be apprehended, the enemy by which we are mostly tempted ; for " each one is tempted by his own concupiscence ;" (James i. ;) a dangerous enemy, which is always within us, and is interwoven with om* nature ; a dreadful enemy, which we naturally love ; a soothing enemy, which gains upon us imperceptibly, and by insinuation. This enemy (says St. Chrysostbm) must be brought under subjection, must be utterly subdued by Christian mortification, if we expect that gi'ace shall overcome temptation. ON TEMPTATION. 23 For I say that a Christian,^ wlio is a stranger to this kind of mor- tification ; who pampers his flesh in ease and effeminacy ; who is all for pleasure, and indulges in all the conveniencies of Mfe ; who holds intelligence, and acts in concert with corrupt nature, and on all ;occasions gratifies inclination, and relies, notwithstanding, on the grace of God, as if that alone were sufficient for salva- tion, knows neither what grace is, nor the first principles of the religion he professes. Tliis St. Bernard proves in the follomng manner : the chief effect, which ought to uphold him, and secure his salvation-, is to extinguish concupiscence by means of mortifi- cation. You, on the contrary, beloved hearer, you, a sensual and delicate Christian, strengthen it instead of weakening it, and become its abettor, instead of retrenching what gives it the advan- tage in its attacks upon you. That is, instead of aiding grace against the temptation, you are aiding to the temptation in oppo- sition to grace, and frustrate by the one the influence of the other. Never ought you, therefore, to expect that grace will have the desired effect, unless you would ask contradictory things, namely : that grace and concupiscence may rule you by turns ; or, that God Almighty, by an extraordinary miracle, Avould create new graces, which, without subduing the flesh, would make the spirit prevail. But mistake not the case, and be constantly mindful, that the graces of God are never dispensed according to the will and liking of man, but according to the wise and invariable disjjo- sition of divine Providence: for " the virtue of the holy Spirit is not imparted to us by our own choice, but by the divine appoint- ment." And, indeed, how did the saints encounter temptation ? What stratagem did they use, what means did they employ in opposition to it ? Did not holy David, in the midst of the pomp and plea- sures of a court, gird his loins Avith haii-cloth, when his thoughts disturbed him, and the rebellion of his heart impelled liim to evil? " As for me, (says he,) Avhen they were troublesome to mc, I was clothed with hair-cloth." Ps. xxxiv. Was it not this that induced St. Paul to treat his body with so much rigour ? "I chastise my body, (says he,) and bring it under subjection." I Cor. ix. How tlien ! Is the gi-ace we receive of a different nature from Avhat was conferred on that gi-eat apostle ? Are we endued with more fervour, or is om- flesh reduced to gi'eater subjection, than was that of the man after God's own heart ? Are we assailed by the enemy c2 24 ON TEMPTATION. in a diftercnt manner from so many religious, and so many solitaries, tlic chosen servants and friends of God ? Not one among them dm-st trust to grace, without mortifying the senses; and we, without mortifying or controUing the senses ; what do I say ? in the downy lap of ease and convenience, nay, softness and voluptu- ousness, are so strangely presumptuous, as to hope for the influence of God's grace. St. Jerom, however loaded with merits, thought himself, even Avitli the assistance of grace, unable to resist, unless of his body he made a victim of penitence ; and we, weak mortals, pretend to bear up against the charms of the world, and all the most violent efforts of hell, by making of our bodies idols of self- love. Hilarion and Anthony, those heavenly men, those angels upon earth, condemned themselves to watchings, abstinence, and all the rigours of a painful and austere life ; because they well knew that it was the best, the only method of extinguishing the fire of concupiscence, and repressing its sallies ; and we expect to deaden it by furnishing everything best adapted to give it life and activity. St. John the Baptist, who was sanctified in his mother's womb, and who might have said, that divine grace was born along with him, relied on it only inasmuch as he exercised it ; or, to speak more correctly, inasmuch as he exercised himself by it and with it, in the constant practice of perfect abnegation ; and we, conceived in sin, and living in sin, promise ourselves tlie grace of victory without fighting ; or the grace of fighting without violence : the grace of sanctity without penitence, or the grace of penitence without austerity. But if that were the case, (concludes St. Jerom,) the life and deeds of that godhke precursor, and of all those who have walked in his footsteps, far from deserving admiration and praise, might justly be looked upon as delusion and folly. Thus reasoned the fathers, who were given us as teachers by the divine Providence, and ought to be our guides in the way of salvation. Be not, therefore, surprised, that worldlings who walk (as the apostle speaks) according to the flesh, and are enemies to the cross and mortification of Jesus, are so easily overcome in the hour of temptation. Ask me not, whence comes it that they resist so seldom, that they yield so easily, that they rise with such diffi- culty ? These are the consequences of their delicacy and sensu- ality ; and if souls like these, who idolize their bodies, were not swayed by concupiscence, it would be the greatest of miracles in the order of grace. No, no ; (says Tertullian, speaking to Chris- ON TEMPTATION. 25 tiana who Avcie persecuted in the primitive times of the Christian ci-a ;) I sliall never believe that those whose flesh is nourished in pleasure, liave the necessary qualifications to enter the lists with torments and death. Whatever ardour a Christian may show for the cause of God, and in defence of his faith, I shall always diffide in, or rather despair of, liis willingness to exchange the delicacy of banquets, of sumptuous apparel, of gay equipages, of a numerous train, for the rigour of dungeons, of racks, of wheels, of scorpion- whips. A champion, in order to get strength for the fight, must previously abstain from sensual pleasures, and be constantly inured to toilsome occupations; for these are the m,eans of acquiring strength. In like manner, the man who prepares for the engage- ment to which his religion calls him, must make trial of himself by mortification, which mil put him in a condition to undergo everything, and be dismayed at nothing. Now what TeiluUian said Avith regard to persecutions, which were the public and external temptations of Christianity, I, -with equal reason, apply to the internal and particular temptations of all the faithful. It is God's grace that must overcome them. But in vain do we presume that grace, though all powerful, will put them to flight, if the flesh which they proceed from be not curbed and kept under. And whoever thinks othermse is grossly mistaken, and goes astray. But in Avhat doth this mortification of the flesh consist ? Aud to what is this exercise (according to the practice of the world) reduced ? The thu-d and last consequence. Ah ! beloved hearers, give me leave to wave mentioning what this vu'tue is, according to the general practice of the world ; a vu'tue scarce known in it, exposed to derision, and held in abhorrence. But whatever notions the world may have of it, the apostolic oracle still subsists, that to serve Jesus Christ, and preserve in his service an inviolable fideUty, we must crucify our flesh, and die to our passions and irregular desires, because " they that are Christ's, have crucified their flesh with their vices and lusts." Gal. v. It will always be true, (what- ever may be the opinion of the world,) that among all mankind, there is no condition in which this crucifying of the flesh is not necessary, absolutely necessary, because all mankind are exposed to temptation. Whatever difficulty the world may have to join issue with me, the sole experience of its own irregularities sufli- ciently demonstrates, that the more exalted men's stations arc, the more frequent ought to be the mortification of their senses, as tem^)- 36 ON TEMPTATION. tations in exalted stations are most general and most violent. Whatever thoughts the world may conceive of it, at least it must grant, that the more a sinner lies open to temptation, the more strictly and rigorously it is incumbent on him to observe this law of bodily chastisement. Were we, indeed, such Christians as we ought to be, these gospel rules, however general, would be more than sufficient to make us know our duty. But being overruled by self-love, and our self-indulgence being so excessive, scarce can we take up a settled resolution to inflict any voluntary pains on ourselves, though ever so slight. What then doth the church do ? This general command she hath determined and reduced to a par- ticular obligation, the Lenten fast. And in doing this, she is influenced by her knowledge of our weakness on one hand, and necessities on the other. She is regulated by the example of the ancient patriarchs, but much more by that of Christ our Lord. She is authorised by the power which God hath conferred on her, to promulgate laws for the conduct of her children ; and she expects from our fidelity, that if we be desirous of mortifying the flesh, so much as is needful for the overcoming of temptation, not only shall we find that nothing is ordained by this precept too rigorous, but shall do more than is ordained, because what is ordained will be found insufficient, in a thousand emergencies, to bridle our affec- tions, and extinguish the fire of our unruly passions. Such, beloved Christians, was the end which the church pro- posed in instituting this holy fast. But in course of time, what is come to pass ? What we never can deplore with sufficient zeal, being a disorder that causes such glaring scandals. The devil and the flesh, perceiving themselves weakened by so salutary an observance, have exerted all their strength to procure its abolition. Heterodox teachers have impugned the commandment. Some have maintained, that the church, by imposing it, exceeded the limits of lawful power ; as if Christ liad not told her, when he made her the inheretrix and depository of his authority : " What- ever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven." Matt. vi. Others have acknowledged the power of the church, but denied her having legally enacted the law, or enforced an obligation of paying submission to it ; as if tradition were not evident upon this head, and St. Augustin had not spoken twelve centuries ago, when he said tluit fast was at other times of counsel, but in Lent of precept. Even libertine Cathohcs, devoid of conscience, rise ON TEMPTATION. 27 up in opposition to a practice so usefully and so solidly established : not by starting difficulties against the law itself, or the power of legislation, but by showing a contempt for the one and the other ; by violating the precept Avith scandalous impunity ; by not even seeking some sort of pretext to give colour to their disobedience, and to save appearances. What do I say ? Shall those be deemed members of the chiu'ch of Christ, and be called by a name of which they are not worthy, which they infamously dishonour, the name of Catholic, whereas oiu* blessed Saviour will have us look ujwn them as pagans and idolaters : " He that will not hear the church, let him be unto thee as the heathen and the publican." Matt, xviii. But even among the faithful, of that small number who resixict the church, and are seemingly submissive to her orders and decisions, how many elude the rigour of the precept by false inter- pretations which they give it in favour of corrupt nature ? By sup- posed reasons, which they ascribe to necessity, but which flow froni effeminacy? By unavailing dispensations which their superiors grant them, or which they grant then^elves ? I say unavailing dispensations ; and to give you a proof of it, mark what I advance : you need but consider three great irregularities wliich have crept insensibly into these dispensations, and relatively to Avhich I would fain bring you over to my way of thinking. For, in the first place, they seem commonly annexed, not to persons themselves, but to states adhered to. And, indeed. Christians, is it not surprising, that now-a-daye a man is no sooner possessed of an ample fortune, and raised to an honourable and dignified rank, than he lays aside all thoughts of complying with the precept which enjoins him to fast ? That then his imagination is fertile in excuses to plead exemption ? That then his strength fails him, that his constitution, his health, will no longer suffer him 'to do what he might, and would cheerfully have done in an humble state, in a religious house, in a more regular and more Christian- like course of life ? In the second place, those who think tliem- selves exempt from the law of fasting, are those who the most easily might comply Avith it, your rich ones of the age, who abound in everything, and enjoy all the comforts and convenienciesof fife. I say more : and in the thu-d place, those who lay the greatest stress on an imaginary Avcakncss, in order to evade the obhgation of fasting, are such as ought to use the greatest violence m order to comply with it, because it is for them that it is most necessary. 28 ON TEMPTATION. For, who are they ? Sinners, who are not only responsible to God for the satisfaction due for a thousand crimes heretofore committed, but are fettered also by the inveterate habits, that render them liable, for the time to come, to frequent relapses, which they are bound to guard against. Worldlings, taken up with their lawful professions, and incidental occupations; with a thousand affairs that set before their eyes, without intermission, a thousand objects, which for them are so many unavoidable temptations. Courtiers, whom the hurry and agitation of the comi;, whom its customs and maxims, its intrigues and solicitudes, its effeminacy, its pleasures, its pomp and parade, expose to the most dangerous occasions of sinning. Young persons, women surrounded by numberless adorers, who flatter them, who idolize them, who lavishly praise them, who say endeaiing things to them, who wait on them assiduously : that is, who mean to dishonour them by laying snares in theu' way, in which, alas ! they are too easily and too frequently taken. Fast for these is particularly obligatory ; and yet these are they who particularly pretend to plead exemption from it. They consign it over to monasteries and cloisters. But (answers St. Bernard) if in cloisters and monasteries the precept of fasting be better observed, it is no just consequence, that therefore in them there is most occasion for it. The reason of it is, that by retirement, and by all the exercises of a rehgious profession, the dwellers in them are more screened from danger. Ah ! dear Christians, remember that you never can surmount the temptation, while you obey the flesh and its sinful appetites. Remember that, in the law, God makes no distinction of quality or rank ; or if he doth, that it is not with regard to you or your state, to relax the precept, but to make it, on the contrary, more confined and rigorous. E-emember that you are Christians, as well as others, and that the higher you are raised, the more rocks you have to avoid, and the more enemies to engage with. By consequence, that the more affluent and gi-and your situation is, the more you ought to dread the loss of your souls, and make the stronger efforts for their safety and preservation. Besides the pmctice of fasting and penitence, be assiduous in hearing the word of God, and in performing good works: in hearing the word of God, as the ministers of Christ, at this holy time, dispense with most zeal this holy word, which should enlighten and strengthen you ; in per- forming good works, as the church of God, at this holy time. ON RELAPSE INTO SIN. 29 redoubles all her fervour, and endeavours to awaken all the fbrvoui" of the faithful. Provided wth these arms, you will stand secure. NothAvithstanding the artfulness and subtilty of temptation, not- withstanding its frequent returns and importunity, notwithstanding all its strength, and most violent assaults, you will hold out steadily in the ways of God, and obtain the reward of everlasting glory. SERMON XVIII. ON RBLAPSE INTO SIN. For the Eighteenth Sunday after Pentecost. ^^ Jesus seeing their faith, said to the man sick of the ■palsy : Be of good heart, son, thy sins are forgiven thee" Matt. ix. There is no evil so great, beloved hearers, none so perni- cious to mankind, as sin. And if Jesus did a favour to tliis poor man sick of the palsy, by conferring his health of body on him, and curing his disorder, he did him still a greater, and a thousand times more estimable, by giving health to his soul, and granting him the remission of his sins. AHke is the advantage which we reap, ourselves, from the sacrament of penance. To no purpose had this paralytic man recovered, by the interposition of the divine agency, the use of his limbs, and had heard from the mouth of our Saviour himself that all-powerful word, " Arise and walk," (Matt, ix.,) if, so soon as he Avas cured, he had lost all motion, and had relapsed again into liis former infirmity. To keep within the verge of my subject ; to no pm'pose his sins had been pardoned, if passion, resuming her dominion over liim, had plunged him directly into the same habits ; and to no purpose he had been reconciled to God, if, at the expiration of a few weeks, he had returned again to his criminal practices, and had become a greater enemy than ever to his heavenly benefactor. iTpon this account it was, that our blessed Saviour, after having cured that other palsied man at the pool, of Avhom mention is made in St. John's 30 ON RELAPSE INTO SIN. gospel, admonishes him expressly to sin no more, and to beware of falling back into his past ill conduct, lest he should draw down upon liimsclf a chastisement from heaven more rigorous than that which he hath hitherto experienced : " Behold thou art made whole : sin no more, leat some worse thing happen to thee." John V. Give me leave, therefore, beloved hearers, to speak, this day, u|K)n the same topic. And as the Council of Trent, among the various characteristics of true repentance, repentance by which our sins are forgiven, points out and specifies the stedfastness and perseverance of the penitent sinner, give me leave to handle, for your present instruction, an interesting subject, which I have not touched upon as yet in the pulpit ; a subject, which calls upon me for all my zeal, and upon you for all your attention : it is relapse into sin. 1 mean to let you see what notions we ought to conceive of con- versions, followed by ordinary and habitual relapses. It is a dreadful subject : and if it be true (as St. Augustin affirms) that we should not rejoice, or hear God's grace mentioned, without having our hearts at the same time filled with a salutary fear, according to the prophet : " Rejoice unto the Lord with trem- bhng ;" (Ps. ii. ;) with how much greater reason should we tremble at hearing the doleful lot of numbers of our fellow Chris- tians, which I am going to lay before you in this discourse ? There are divers states, according to divines, both of sin and of grace ; but of all these states, there arc two the most common in the present Ufe. One is, to recover firom a lapse into sin by the sacrament of penance ; the other, to forfeit the grace con- ferred by a relapse into sin. Now the former (says St. Gre- gory) constitutes the happiness of man upon earth, and gives him communication with all the other states of holiness. For, the sacrament of penance restores us to the state of grace, and puts it in our power never more to sin ; it re-establisheth us in the greatest privileges of gi*ace, as if we had never committed sin ; it serves us in lieu of a confirmed grace, to preserve us from falling into sin ; and it enables us to merit the state of glory, wherein it is impossible wc should ever sin. Hence it follows, by a contrary argument, that the latter state, wliich is that of relapse, must be for man the greatest of all misfortunes, as all those advantages of penance are destroyed by it, which again are reducible to two in particular : namely, with regard to the past, to blot out sins com- ON RELAPSE INTO SIN. 31 niitted, and with regard to the future, to corroborate our reso- lution of never more sinning. Observe, therefore, two propositions which I advance. First: ordinary and habitual relapse into sin renders past penitence extremely suspicious. Secondly : renders future penitence not only difficult, but according to the language of the scripture and fathers, morally impossible. What then doth the relapsing sinner do ? Two things. He gives room to doubt that his past penitence was not sincere, and throws himself into a difficulty, an extreme difficulty, or rather an impossibility, of ever returning by a fresh and effectual peni- tence to God. So that he cannot reasonably rely on the past, and ia equally embarrassed with regard to the future. In a word, relapse into ein is a strong presumption of false penitence con- cerning the past, and a great obstacle to true penitence for the time to come. This I shall evince, if you Avill but attentively give ear to the arguments which I shall adduce in support of my assertion. Part I. Notwithstanding the rigorous exactness of the law, which true penitence, when we are going to renounce sin, requires ; far be it from me, beloved Christians, absolutely and universally to condenm the penitence, however doubtful, of a sinner Avho feels in his own heart a consciousness that he proceeds, or that he hath proceeded, with candour and uprightness. To pass such a judg- ment is the province of God, and of God only. As the ministers (says St. Augustin) of the Son of God have it not in their power to give sinners whom they reconcile, and whose consciences they absolve, an entire assurance ; so they cannot deprive them, when reconciled and absolved, of a firm confidence, whether well or ill founded, that their sins are remitted, and their penitence found grace in the presence of God. For, the priest, notwithstanding he is God's vicegerent, and is empowered to dispense the sacrament of penance, cannot answer for certainty for the dispensation thereof being valid or null. None but God knows whether or not our penitence have all the requisites for making it just and receivable, as, next to God, none but om-selves can be certain that it wants them. And the reason of tliis difference is, that to know if penance be perfect and effectual, we can judge of it only from two principles, which are, the grace of God and the will of man. Now both 32 ON RELAPSE INTO SIN. together are known to God only. Whereas to know that it is defective and void, it suffices that the sinner be convinced of his own indisposedness and guilt. But no one hath a right, besides God and the sinner, to conclude positively, that a man's penitence, whatever appearance it may wear of unworthiness, is void and ineifectual, because no one can prove it evidently and incontestably. True, dear Christians : but in default of evidence, there may be conjectures ; and these conjectures may be so strong and cogent, as to give room for a reasonable and well-grounded presumption ; and this presumption may be such as to authorise the judgment which the priest, the minister of God, passes upon the penitence of certain sinners, deeming it suspicious, and rejecting it as such, when his duty obliges him to take cognizance of it. For, this, agreeably to the spirit and laws of chm'ch discipline, is daily put in practice. Now of all the conjectures which can, and which should raise doubts concerning the penitence of a sinner, that which appears to be the least equivocal, and by which I abide, as the most convincing, and, at the same time, the most plain and obvious, is a speedy relapse which usually follows the penitence of a certain kind of men ; and this I prove, beloved hearers, by a plain demonstration, and thus I argue the case with yourselves. You have performed, you say — I speak to a sinner of that class, of which St. James conceived him to be, whose heart being divided between God and the world, is inconstant in his Avays, that is, in his penitence and conversion : "A double-minded man, incon- stant in his ways ;" (James i. ;) you have performed those duties, to perform which your religion obliges you, and the minister of the Lord, relying on the firmness of your inward dis- position, says to you, as our blessed Saviour said to the penitent Magdalen, thy sins are forgiven thee : go in peace. On this is founded the deceitful tranquillity which possesses your mind, and which heaven forbid I should now indiscreetly set about to disturb. But be pleased to observe what the ground of it ought to be, and the means by which such ground is ascertained. If your penitence be really such as you suppose it, two things have passed between God and you ; I say two things, things inseparable from the sacrament of penance : one, on your part, having engaged yourself to God by a sincere protestation of never more relapsing, which lost you his favour ; the other, on God's part, having reciprocally engaged himself to you, and promised to ON RELAPSE INTO SIN. 33 afFt)rJ you the assistance of his grace, in order to strengthen yon against future relapses. This is the declaration of the Council of Trent. For we learn from the very principles of faith, that all i^acraments which operate without let, besides their virtue of sanctifying souls, communicate likewise special graces toward obtaining the end peculiar to them. Now there is no end more peculiar to the sacrament of penance, than the preserving of man from a relapse into sin. It remains, therefore, to be known, Avhether, when a Christian, without any visible amendment in life, relapses easily, speedily, and frequentl}-, into the same trans- gressions, we may reasonably suppose, that he hath received from above those peculiar graces, and that he hath a sincere desire and efficacious will to renounce his sin. Now I hold it, that neither the one nor the other carries with it the least appearance of pro- bability. And as the resolution to persevere, and to relase no more, is one of the most essential parts of the sacrament ; and the increase of spiritual aid, to which the justified soul acquires a kind of light, is the principal fruit of it : seeing no sign of these in a sinner subject to speedy and frequent relapses, I have cause to apprehend, that his presence was void of the qualities requisite to justify him in the presence of Almighty God. This is the proof, this the foundation of my first proposition. Give me leave to enlarge upon it. I shall not here speak of the auxillarj'' graces, which, in consequence of the sacrament, Almighty God would, beyond all doubt, confer upon man, if man would but put himself, by being converted, in a condition to receive them. This, it Is true, would evince more strongly the truth of my asser- tion, but would not, perhaps, be so affecting an argument, or make so deep and lasting an Impression. Let us then dwell solely upon the sinner's will, which divines allow to be the very substance and groundwork of penance. In truth, beloved hearers, is it credible that a man shall have a determined, fixed, and absolute will to renounce sin, and that presently afterwards, a sinful object being presented to his mind, he shall shamefully yield to, and, Avithout resistance, sink under the temptation ? Ah ! (says St. Bernard,) nothing is more forcible than the human will, when consistent with itself. Every thing submits to it, every thing obeys it. There is no difficulty which it doth not remove, no opposition which It doth not siu-- mount ; and that which otherwise would appear impossible. 34 ON RELAPSE INTO SIN. becomes feasible and easily, when undertaken cordially. Now this is undeniable, in a particular manner, with regard to sin : for, whatever corruption is inherent in our nature, we sin not, after all, but because we have the will to commit sin ; and if the will be wanting, it is undoubtedly true, that we do not commit sin. So that our will, in this respect, preserves a kind of sovereignty over itself, and participates, in some measure, of the divine omnipotence, as in what regards sin, it absolutely acts by free choice, and, in order not to sin, hath in its own option to reject or admit. I have, therefore, all the reason imaginable to think, that the will would not resist and renounce sin, because I see plainly, by what follows, that it no way resists, nor renounces sin at all. It is St. Bernard's alignment, an argument incompatible with the principles of Pela- gianism, as it supposes the influence of the grace of Christ Jesus, and is easily reconciled with what St. Paul said, when he com- plained, that " the evil which he would not, that he did," (Rom. vii.) because by that he understood the involuntary motions of his heart ; whereas St. Bernard's discourse relates to the free consent which is given to sin. In like manner, Tertullian observes, that when we are apt to put the tiling in execution, which, at our conversion, we promised to God, it is a mistake to say, I was wilUng to do it, but I did not : for, says this great man, either you were willing but by halves, and this half was insufficient for penance ; or you were thoroughly and efficaciously willing ; and then it was natural you should put it into execution. And, indeed, (adds he,) if your will was good, how comes it that it should be so very effectual, on all occasions, and that it should be, on this, of none effect ? How comes it that at the sight of a relapse so mortal as that which you had undoubted reason to apprehend, you made no effort, nor gained any victory ? How comes it that you fled not from the approaching danger ? How comes it that you broke not off that company, that conversation, that diversion, which you knew to be for you an immediate occasion of recidivation ? Nothing, however, have you done of all this ; and the very first time that the enemy of man laid a bait in your way, after some slight unavailing remorses which yoiu* conscience stifled, you followed its captive charm and allurement ; and, notwithstanding all tliis, you would have me believe, that you had the sincere and true pui-pose of amending your life, which is requisite to penance. But, for the ON RELAPSE INTO SIN, 36 the credit of iienance, and for the interests of God and of his holy grace, I had rather presume, that you had imjwsed upon and wanted a right knowledge of yourself. It is Tertulhan's con- clusion, a conclusion, in my mind, extremely just, and no less solid. Against this. Christians, three things may be urged, to which it is of the utmost importance that I answer, as the removing of 60 many mistaken notions will serve to confirm you in the doctrine I preach. Some will say : may it not so happen, that, without lying to the divine Spirit, I may be inconstant and fi-ail, and my will, having had, at the moment it followed the attractive of grace, whatever was necessary for a perfect conversion, might have been so perverted, as to commit the sin it not long before sincerely detested ? Yes, I o^vn with St. Thomas, that it is possible, and may come to pass. But at the same time I say, that when relapses are sudden and frequent, it is impossible that the change shpuld be of that nature. The reason is this, and beyond reply : because your conduct, in all other respects, how weak soever you may suppose yourself, cannot be charged with the like unaccountable inconstancy and levity. On the contrary, as often aa in other matters you have taken a resolution (if your interest be ever so little concerned) you stedfastly adhere to, and pursue it with ardour. If, in the undertaking, your honour is concerned, or the advance- ment of your fortune depends thereon, you know not what it is to desist from the pursuit ; neither do we perceive that woful fatality to slacken in the accomplishment of whatever excites your ambition or avarice. How can you expect, that in the one only point which regards penance, we should suppose you unsteady, and subject to change ? Or that we should harbour so injurious a notion of you, as to imagine that your conduct, in regard to every worldly interest, is of a piece and uniform ; and that those vicissitudes in your mental faculties are perceived only where it is incumbent on you to be faithful to God? Had you not better say, that there was no unstea- diness, and that you suffered no change? That your will was always the same, always inefficacious concerning good, always secretly attached to evil, and by a necessary consequence, always fruitless and unprofitable for penance ? This is my sentiment concerning the matter; and (do yourself justice) it is hard it shoiUd not be yours too. And what makes me more strongly of this opinion, is, that you fre- quently relapse %vithout any pretext or colour. 1 mean, that the 36 ON RELAPSE INTO SIN. occasions which you met with of sinning were not more dangerous, and that the temptations into which you fell were not more violent. Now is it not natural to suppose a change in the circumstance of the will, wliile its object remains in the same situation, especially in regard to a serious, prudent, enlightened will, such as yours must have been, if your penitence had had the characteristic marks which, for the remission of sin, and the justification of the sinner, God requii-es. Another difficulty. We are weak ; and that wall, though cer- tainly sincere, (which true penitence always includes,) is attacked b}^ those powerful enemies — our passions. I know it, Christians ; and I can agree with you relatively to the violence of the attack. But I know, likewise, that one of the artifices of our self-love is, to suppose that these enemies are much more powerful than they are in rcahty, in order to enable us to yield the victory with less reproach of our own conscience. Or rather, I know that one effect of the great depravity of our will is, to hold intelligence with these supposed enemies, because, at bottom, we deem them not enemies, but are really willing to be overcome by them. This (says St. Jerom) is the inordinate manner in which we proceed. Far from being abashed at our own weakness, we take the advantage of it against God himself: that is, far from being mortified at it, we use it as a varnish to frivolous excuses, which we allege for our sins ; and what is pusillanimity, malignity, and unfaithfulness, we falsely and chimerically attribute to necessity. And what St. Jerom says of Christians in general, that Tertullian reproaches himself withal. We are clothed (says he) mth a terrestrial flesh, an animal flesh, that Impels us to sin ; but we are made amends by the dignity of our soul, which is spiritual and celestial, and which lifts up to God. Why, therefore, are we perpetually alleging our frailty, without ever considering the force and efficacy of nature and grace, of reason and law, of conscience and religion, wliich we have always at command ? But granting that those passions, the impetuosity of whose sallies it is incumbent on us to resist and repel, arc as dreadful enemies as we can suppose them ; yet I know, furthermore, that if the promise we made, of invariably persevering in obedience to the law, had been real and sincere, it would have been more forcible than those supposed enemies ; and its most essential property was, to be able to surmount them ; and that if it had not this virtue of itself, it is a very natural consequence, ON RELAPSE INTO SIN. 37 that, therefore, our penitence was false. Now who shall persuade me that it had this virtue, while there is no appearance of it ; and I see a sinner, after his penitence, as much a slave to his passions, as irregular in his hfe, as licentious in his words, as froward in his actions, as he was before ? For, to lay before you the Avhole matter, the purpose of amendment is not one of those mere unavailing desires, which we read of in scriptiu-e, and which the soul conceives, but wants strength to bring forth. It is a supernatural will, in so superior a degree to all other wills of which man is capable, that no other can be put in comparison with it. A will, which must have Almighty God for its object ; which must make us sove- reignly detest sin, and to which the smallest inducement is the fear and horror of eternal justice — that justice so terrible to the enemies of God I These are its qualities — qualities, (as we learn from the dictates of faith,) without Avhich, penance is not only imperfect, but absolutely null. Now can our purpose be supposed to have had all these qualities, when (contrary to the agreement which, at our return to him, we made with God, contracting an obligation of persisting steadfastly in the state of grace) we suddenly abandon him, and the sight of a prostitute makes us wholly forgetful of our strongest resolutions and most indispensable obhgations. Give me leave, Christians, to judge of you by yourselves ; and to show you, as clear as the meridian sun, the most evident of all truths : let us see how you behave in matters of much inferior con- sequence, in which no doubt can be had concerning the efficacy of your Avill. Just recovered from a dangerous illness, you fear a relapse ; and what do you do in order to prevent it ? You restrain your palate, you refrain from dainties, you pay obedience to the doctor who attends you, and submission to the regimen which he prescribes. You are scrupulously nice, you are exact to super- stition. You fast, you mortify yourselves. You spend the time in silence and retirement. Whatever is most agreeable in life you forego. Company, diversions, assemblies, plays, all are held at naught, because your health, Avhich you would wish to recover, is much more dear to you than all those ; and, cost Avhat it will, you are resolved to preserve it. To tell you it is a shame that you do so much less in order to avoid a relapse into sin, which brings death to your soul, Avould be to tell you what you have been told a thousand times. But I will tell you more ; and an admirable \OL. 11. D 38 ON RELAPSE INTO SIN. # principle of religion it is. If your purpose of avoiding a relapse into sin is not more efficacious than your natural desire[of preserv- ing your health, (I do not say more lively or feeling, but more solid and strong,) it is an article of faith, that your penitence is invalid. And why ? Ah I beloved hearers, give ear to this : because it is an article of faith, that the purpose of amendment which penance includes, must exceed all the fears, and all the desires with which the will is naturally affected. And, if in our heart' there were one fear, or one desire, that should surpass, or equal this purpose of amendment, it would no longer be that pur- pose which salutary penance ^.Iways includes, and which alone can eifect the sinner's salvation. This is a doctrinal point of conse- quence ; and the reason given for it^ by the fathers is, that the sorrow which justifies us should make us hate sin as thoroughly as we love and fear God. Now to satisfy in rigour the obligation of the law, it is not sufficient to love and fear God ; we must love and fear him sovereignly, that is, above all things. So likewise, to fill up the measure of contrition, it is not sufficient to detest sin ; we must detest it above all evils whatever ; and if the detestation we conceive of it be not in that degree, in vain do we expect that God will approve of, or be pleased with our penitence. Now, according to this, beloved Christians, you whose penitence was followed by inconstancy, dare you say, that at the moment you confessed to God the violation of this law, you were more deter- mined never more to violate it, than you would be at this time to guard against a malady that might cause your death ? And if, from the knowledge which you have of yourselves, you dare not presume to bear this testimony, can I hope that your penitence found grace before God ? 1 shudder at the very thoughts of your condition ! You say that the passion by which you are swayed, and which leads you into sin, assaults you more violently than all those toge- ther which oppose your desire of preserving your life. In that, Christiass, we greatly deceive ourselves ; it is a gross mistake. For, to show you that it is not the spring of your relapses, it is evident to me, that influenced only by human motives, and there- fore inferior to those of penitence, you would renounce this passion, and be masters of it. In reality, suppose any one sin, tlie habit of which seems most insurmountable, and I will undertake to produce a hundred motives of interest or honour that would induce you to ON RELAPSE INTO SIN. 39 fiurmount it. For instance, beloved hearers, if you were sure that a relapse into this sin would be the ruin of your fortune, would occasion the loss of your prince's favoui;, and would put you past all hopes of evermore recovering your former condition : if you, woman of the world, were convinced that the irregularity of your conduct would become public, and that you would be made to undergo the shame and ignominy attending it ; that he from whose knowledge you so artfully concealed it, would find a clue that would lead him, unobserved, to the iniquitous scene, and that you would be exposed to all the rage of a jealous mind, and to the frantic raptures of a heart inflamed with the spirit of revenge, how frail and weak soever you may be, there would need no more to check you, and restrain you within the bounds of duty. This motive, therefore, would effectuallystop the course of your passion. Yet you say, that notwithstanding the motive to penitence", you are unable to curb it. But what inference am I to draw from thence ? Ought I to infer that the motive to penitence is not, of itself, so powerful as that of worldly consideration ? No ; for that would be an error injurious to God. I ought to infer, that in all probability, you were not affected by the motive to penitence, and that it had no share in actuating your heart : I mean, that you did not detest sin upon account of God, sovereignly, and above all things to be loved and to be feared ; and by consequence, that your penitence should come under the same predicament with those which God rejects. This is my inference, an inference conformable to the most indubitable and incontestable maxims of religion. The third, and last objection that I am to speak to. Those sinners who are subject to relapses, humble themselves before God, are moved at their own wretchedness, form acts of sorrow, are racked with anguish, bemoan theu- condition, and pour forth abun- dant floods of tears. Now what are all these but so many acts o^ true contrition ? A false principle, repKes the learned Chancelloi Gerson, treating of this subject. All these are not Avhat we call acts of true contrition. What then ? The grace, and if you will have it so, the desire, but seldom the fruits and acts of penitence. For here we must distinguish four things : the grace of penitence, the desire of penitence, an act of penitence, and the fruits of peni- tence. The grace of penitence is the holy propensity, by which God incites us to reUnquish sin. The desire of penitence is, as I may say, the first attempt which the heart makes to disentangle d2 40 ON RELAPSE INTO SIN. iteelf from sin. An act of penitence is an effectual shaking off the manacles of sin. And the fruits of penitence are the deeds which Ave offer in satisfaction to our offended God for sin. A relapsing sinner may easily have the grace and desire of penitence ; but it is hardly credible, that, so long as he persists in his inordinate ways, he hath an act and the fruits of it. My meaning is this : he had the grace of penitence at the time when he poured forth tears of sorrow ; for that sorrow was an internal grace which God pro- duced in him ; but which, notwithstanding, destroyed not within him the will to sin. The reason is, that (as St. Gregory, pope, observes) the wicked are often unavailingly affected by the love of God, in the same manner that the righteous are innocently impelled by the force of temptation to evil ; and as temptation, barely such, renders not the will of the righteous criminal ; so the grace of peni- tence, barely such, confers not that holiness on the will of the ■wicked. The sinner is seduced into error by confounding the grace of penitence with the effect of penitence, and by attributing to himself what God doth for him, as if he had done it himself for God. A vciy pernicious blindness, says St. Bernard. By a kind of usurpation, we attribute to ourselves what God had wrought within us, taking his spiritual illuminations for our own contem- plations, and his divine operations for our own co-operations. Now this is the ordinary practice of sinners, slaves of concupi- scence and of the evil spirit. And what is my proof of this asser- tion ? None but that which I have borrowed from St. Gregory. For if I perceive (says this great pope) that a Christian is agitated by grievous temptations, but follows not the bent of his nature to evil, I may presume, in his favour, that he liad but indeliberate feelings of them, and that his will was pei-fectly free from consent. And by the same rule, when I see a sinner, though sorely afflicted, and to all appearance racked with compunction, not the less frail, and addicted to relapses, I think myself sufficiently authorised to say, that if he had the affection, he had not the resolution, which is a necessary part of true penitence. Or if he had, it was one of those resolutions, of those good desires, "with which hell abounds : one of those half wills, such as the devils have, who, devils as they are, detest sin, as the original cause of all their woes, although through their obstinacy they never quit it. Penitence of this natvu*e, is like that of the Israelites, who, going over as inconsi- '^•erately from the worship of God to idolatry, as they returned to ON RELAPSE INTO SIN. 41 the worship of God fi'om idolatry, did (according to the scriptures) but provoke and irritate God the more. Protestations of this nature, are like those of Antiochus, to wliich the divine justice remains inflexible, and which cannot penetrate to the tlirone of mercy. Tears of this nature are hke those of Esau, which, though accom- panied Avith loud cries and roarings, are not accounted worthy the blessing of heaven. All this, I say, I will grant a sinner whose relapses are habitual, because in all tliis there is nothing i*epugnant to the notion I conceive of suspected penitence. If, on the con- trary, it be suspected, it is because all this coalesces in it, and it joins relapses to the appearance of contrition, and confession in words to unfaithfulness in deeds. But to have full reliance on the penitence of a Christian whose disposition to relapse is such as I have described it, is what cannot be done but in contravention to all the precepts and rules of religion. Thus Jesus Christ himself judged of it; and his example con- cerning the discernment of the heart, as in all other things, ought to be our model. Accordingly, St. John, in the second chapter of his gospel, tells us, that "many of the Jews believed in him, but he did not trust himself to them, for that he knew all men." John ii. These Avords deserved to be remarked. They believed in him, being excessively surprised at the change of water into wine, which he effected at the marriage-feast at Cana, and of which they had been witnesses ; " but he did not trust himself to them," because he discovered in them but a superficial faith, suddenly etuTcd up at the sight of that prodigy ; a faith, which would soon, by the malignant impressions of then- wonted incredulity, be effaced from their minds. Thus it is that God acts by us, whenever we approach the tribunal of penance, only to resume, immediately after, our former habits and way of life. At that moment we lay open, or think we lay open, our soul to him. We are confident of him, and Ave ansAver for ourselves ; and by these appearances of fervom' and regret, avc impose, oftentimes, on his very ministers. For (says Tertullian) it is easy to deceive them ; and if the remis- sion of sin had been as absolutely in their poAver, as the Avords Avhich signify it, it Avould be constantly exposed to the artifices and deceits of false penitence. But Avhat doth God do on such occasions? Seeing our inconstancy, that avc Avill and Avill not renounce our sin ; and knoAving, by the light of his adorable pre- science, that after a supposed retiurn to him, avc shall speedily fall 42 ON RELAPSE INTO SIN. back into our evil practices, and be as strongly attached to the world as ever, he takes heed of his treasure, which is the grace of his sacrament, and suffers not that persons so unworthy as we, by a fraudulent penitence, have the benefit of receiving it. Ah I Christians, how terrible it is for a man of the world, who is hurried into wickedness by the vehemence of his passions, but is not destitute of religious sentiments, to think that penance, which for others, after sin, is a motive of confidence, is, after relapse, a motive for him of dread and horror ! That which should be for him a cause of tranquillity, infests his mind with deadly inquietudes ; and he ought to be disturbed, not only at past sins, but at past contrition, and past penance. This is the instruction, beloved hearers, which the Holy Ghost would give us, when in Ecclesiasticus he gives this admonition : "Be not without fear about sins forgiven." Ecclus. v. We did not understand the mys- tical meaning of these words, which, seemingly, included a kind of contradiction. For if sin be forgiven, why should it still give us fear and apprehension ? And if it be cause of fear and appre- hension, for what reason should it be looked upon as pardoned ? But now, O my God, I conceive what you would thereby intimate to us. You would show me that every kind of penitence is not sufficient security with you, and that which I deem forgiven, is oftentimes that which makes me more than ever a child of wrath ; that I may be ruined by mortal sin of whatever kind ; but that there is still a kind of penitence more capable of damning me than my very sin, inasmuch as it foments it, instead of curing it. Now it is clear beyond all doubt, that if there be any penitence of this kind, it is that which Avorks no reformation of manners, nor pre- serves me from my unhappy relapses. But, O my Lord, where shall I place my confidence and security, if you forbid me to place them in my penitence ? Have you taught me any other way but that ? And have your sci'iptures, which I hold in place of oracles, directed me to betake myself to any other refuge ? Such is the deplorable state of a sinner, abandoned to all the fluctuations of his heart, and instability of his desires ; and whose motley life is a constant inconsistency, a perpetual alteration, and reciprocal succession of relapse and penitence. I know this doctrine may disturb some consciences ; and I would to God Almighty it may produce so happy and salutary an effect ! For I speak to those sinners whom frequent relapses have confirmed ON RBLAPSE INTO SIN. 43 in iniquity. Now their only resource is, to be disturbed in mind by the word of God. Their undoing proceeds from the deceitful tran- quillity which, sometimes, by the artifice of the deceitful spirit, they enjoy in their sin ; and only such disturbance can awaken and rouse them from the fatal supineness and spiritual lethargy in which they are buried. Accordingly, far from being afraid to dis- turb them, my only fear is, that I shall not be able to distm-b them at all, or at most, shall disturb them only by halves. And, as St. Paul heretofore " was glad, not because they [Corinthians] were made sorrowful, but because they were made sorrowfid unto penance ;' ' (2 Cor. vii. ;) so should I bless God for having given uneasiness to so many sinners, because by such means, to the shadow would succeed the reality of penance. But this, perhaps, would drive them to despair. Alas ! what harm to drive them to despair for a short time, in order to renew in them a never-ceasing hope ! What danger in making tliem despair on their part, in order to make them hope on the part of God ? This way of speaking is boiTOwed from St. Gregory, and I do but deliver the thoughts of that father. Now, it was a maxim with him to raise pangs of despair in the minds of those, who, by continual relapses, were hardened in sin. No, no, beloved hearers, fear not being seized with that kind of despair : it must, in my mind, be of great utiUty. Be afflicted at so many false penitences, and rejoice in the Lord at the true penitence to which I exhort you. Since you first contracted a habit of sinning, perhaps you have made a hundred unworthy and sacrilegious confessions : be afflicted at all that. For, all that, far from corroborating your hope before God, will be the ruin and destruction of it. What then must be done ? Ah ! Christians, is anything more rea- sonable than what is required of you ? We require of you that you act sincerely by God, in the manner you would have us act by you. If we had broken our word with you over and over, you would think it agreeable to the dictates of wisdom to disbelieve and reject the assiu^nces we should give you, that we would act upon principles of strict honour ; and can you expect, that the God of heaven will pay greater regard to your protestations ? Is it allowable for you to be more religious towards men than him ? You pique yourself on the accuracy of your dealings with men, and would be ashamed to be deficient in any particular ; and shall there be an utter want of faith fulness in y om- dealings with God alone ? 44 ON RELAPSE INTO SIN. Wherefore, Christians, let us holily and profitably do that at last, which we have oftentimes done, perhaps fruitlessly, and to our condemnation. Let us imitate those holy penitents of the church, who all their life long adhered inviolably to their gracious God, after they had once recovered his grace. Let us keep to our resolutions, and by a steady perseverance let us ratify our peni- tence. Otherwise we shall have all imaginable reason to be apprehensive as well for future as for past penitence. For as relapse makes past penitence much to be suspected, it makes futmre penitence extremely difficult, and almost impossible, which is the subject of the second part. Part II. When I consider the terms which the sacred penmen, speaking of the penitence which follows relapse into sin, make use of, I am not surprised, beloved Christians, that certain heretics, in former ages, should have been rigorous to an extreme, and should have set, on this head, no bounds or measure to the severity of this doctrine. Perhaps it may be said, that error was never better founded to appearance — (I say appearance) — on the authority of the word, than that of the novations, who, after baptism, abso- lutely and universally excluded all sinners from the grace of peni- tence. And when Tertullian, arguing from prejudice, would not allow it but once only, and without hope of return, he pretended to speak so conformably to the scripture, that he could not com- prehend how any of the faithful should diflfer in opinion from him. And truly it should seem that nothing could be spoken in more express terms, than that which we read in St. Paul to the Hebrews : " It is impossible — [my brethren,] — (these are his words, which you have heard a thousand times, and of which I take upon me to lay now before you the precise meaning)— it is impossible for those who have been once illuminated, have tasted also the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, have moreover tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, and are fallen away, to be renewed again to penance, crucifying afresh to themselves the Son of God, and making him a mockery." In this manner, I say, St. Paul explained himself. What better pretext could those heretics desire for carrying into execution the design they had forniied of abolishing the exercise and ministry of penance ? The church hatli condemned them, and we condemn them with her. St. Jcrom and St. Augustin have intei-preted ON llELAPSE INTO SIN. 45 tliat passage as setting forth the impossibilitj of ever rcturmno-, when once it is lost, to baptismal grace ; because baptism, which was called in those days the first penance, is one of those sacra- ments tliat cannot be reiterated. And this explanation, which I deem the most literal, takes off, if I may venture so to speak, all the hardness of the apostle's expression. St. Thomas of Aquin and Hugo of St. Victor took it more plainly, and understood it of that penance which we call the sacrament of reconciliation, endea- vouring to reconcile the possibility of conversion for relapsino- sinners with these excessively tremendous words, *'It is impossible to be renewed again to penance." Be that as it may, beloved Christians, the great rule we go by is, to keep witliin the limits which the Church had determined, by disallowing the pernicious tenet of Donatus. Now we know by the censure which she passed on that tenet, and our faith tells us, that God wills the life, not the death of the sinner ; and he invites him, or rather commands and obliges him, to do penance again ; and that, therefore, notwithstanding our relapses, penitence is stUl possible, and grace is ready for the fulfilling thereof. This is the decision of the Church of Christ. But there she stops, leaving to the words of the great apostle the whole extent and the whole force of which they are susceptible. And as the term impossible, in common language, is applicable to things that may abso- lutely be, but of which the execution is difficult, and attended with great obstacles, she hath always authorised the opinion of the fathers, who maintain that, especially for certain sinners, sinners subject to certain relapses, as you shall see presently, it is morally impossible, in some measure, that is, extremely difficult, to renounce their sin, and be converted to God. If we reason like Christians, should not this alone suffice to make us walk with fear and trem- bling in the slippery way to eternal salvation. But let us endeavour, as much as possible, to investigate the matter, and penetrate into it ; and in order to draw from it what- ever fruit it is capable of producing, let each of us apply it to himself in particular. You ask me the reason why relapse into sin should render penitence so very difficult ? And I, with St. Ber- nard, answer that it is, because it estranges the heart of God from us, because it adds strength to our natural bent and inclination to evil, because it enfeebles the virtue which grace hath infused into us, and because it essentially includes an opposition to the grace 46 ON RELAPSE INTO SIN. which reconciles sinners to God. These four articles considered separately may stand in place of a demonstration. 1st. Yes, beloved hearers, the first misfortune which relapses bring on us is the alienating of God's affection from us, and the exhausting, in some sort, of his infinite mercy ; which, infinite as it is in itself, is limited, notwithstanding, in regard to us, and to the distribution which it makes of those special graces and extra- ordinary succours, on which om' conversion and amendment depend : " For three crimes of Damascus, and for four I will not convert it," (Amos i.,) says the Lord by his prophet. The three first crimes I have borne ^vith and forgotten ; but against the fourth shall my justice, my anger, and my vengeance act. As how ? By my withdrawing myself from that ungodly people ; a people, who, by their infidelity and wickedness have provoked and exasperated me. Now, beloved Christians, the moment that God withdraws himself from us, we must not be surprised that penitence becomes difficult, and that such difficulty increases proportionably as he -withdraws himself from us. The reason is, that none but God, who by his divine presence fills the heart of man, and diffuses throughout it his divine Spirit, can facilitate penance, and give us a relish for it. Of this can any more expressive figure be adduced than that of the man so famed in the Old Testament, the invincible Sampson ? He had, it is true, been blinded by one particular passion ; but his blindness was not carried, aU at once, to that great degree, as to deprive him of the strength which God had so singularly and miraculously endowed him. The female foreigner, to whom he was affected, by a monstrous perfidy, had frequently attempted, by binding his limbs, to put him into the bands of his declared enemies ; but he always found means to break his bands, and recover his liberty. Upon this he flattered himself, that though she should afterward play the same game over, he should never want might to disconcert her measures, and said, *' I will go forth as I did before." Judges xvi. In short, this artful, wicked woman employs her wiles with such address, as to delude liim, to overcome him, to cut off the seven locks in which lay concealed, by a secret mystery, his great strength. The news soon reached the ears of the Philis- tines. They surround him unawares, they fall upon him in great numbers. He endeavours to rise, " not knowing (adds the text) that the Lord was departed from him." Judges xvi. ON RELAPSE INTO SIN. 47 This, beloved hearers, is the portrait of your soul, in that wretched state in which I conceive it ; namely, in the state of relapse into sin. You say to yourself, rousing sometimes from the spiritual somnolency into which you are fallen, and reflecting on yoiu* wretchedness, I will quit this state, as I have already done : I will break my chains, I will make a vigorous effort, I wiU free myself from the passion which holds me in captivity : "I will go forth and shake myself." But do you not consider, that God retires from you ; that proportionably as he retires, you are deprived of his aid ; that penance of course becomes a heavy burden, an insupportable yoke ; and that whereas heretofore it was a source of comfort to you, it now creates horror and disgust in your mind ; for, your frequent relapses have made a w^de separation, and almost insurmoimtable, between you and your God : " Not knowing that the Lord was departed from you." How often, Christians, have you learned by experience what 1 now advance. 2ndly. The vriU, however, is daily perverted ; and the relapse wliich enfeebles it for what is good, gives it additional strength for what is evil. You know its progress : and in vain should I set about to enlarge upon it, and as it is by your melancholy experience that I know what it is. After the first sins begins the habit : the habit once contracted leads by little and little into blindness and obduracy. The vice takes root, and becomes, as it were, a second nature. This second nature is what St. Augustin denominates necessity. Of this necessity despair is the consequence, to which succeeds a moral impossibility of doing penance. For this is the notion St. Paul gives of it : " Who despairing have given them- selves up to lasciviousness ;" (Ephes. iv. ;) and he produced for example the sin of the flesh, because it is in it that relapse operates the most infallibly, and the most commonly, these detestable effects. At first, the Christian hated sin as a monster, because liis reason was not as yet blinded, nor his will corrupted. But sin, by relapses, a progressive course, and a natural gradation, gains a total ascen- dant : he accustoms himself to it, he grows familiar with it, he commits it -without scruple, he is passionately fond of it, he despairs of conquering it, he abandons himself to it without restraint : ** Who despairing having given themselves up to lasciviousness." But whence (says St. Cluysostom) proceeds their despair ? From God and from themselves (replies the holy doctor). From God, because, being a God of sanctity, he cannot approve of what is 48 ON RELAPSE INTO SIN. evil ; and from themselves, because they have frequently expe- rienced their own inconstancy and infidelity. From God and from themselves, because they perceive between God and themselves infinite contrarieties. And tliis is the origin of their despair. No, Christians : so far from that, it is an additional crime in the pre- sence of God, as It is not, whilst in this life, allowable for the sinner to despair of God's mercy and unmeasurable goodness. But tliis despair, unreasonable as it is, is the chief effect of relapse into sin. The reason is, that hope, Avhich is the basis and ground of penitence, being thereby shaken, the whole fabric of penitence is shaken, contrary to the intention of God himself; and this virtue, which ought to be a resom'ce for the relapsing sinner, becomes a stumbling-block against which the despau- of reforming his vicious life impels him : " Who despairing have given themselves up to lasciviousness." 3rdly. And to this, beloved hearers, that by frequent relapses we render the most powerful and efiicacious remedies of no avail, and that the words of St. Paul seem perfectly accompHshed, where he says, that when we voluntarily commit sin, after having received the knowledge of the faith (weigh well this circumstance) there is thenceforward no sacrifice for the expiation of our sins, and there only remains for us a dreadful expectation of God's judgments : " If we sin wilfully after having the knowledge of the truth, there is now left no sacrifice for sins." Heb. x. In fact, Clu'istians, what Avould you say to a man who had cleansed himself a hundi-ed times in the waters of penance, and as often plunged back into his former abominations ? What would you say ? And with all the ardour and spmt of zeal with which you should feel yourselves animated for him, which way you would set about moving his heart ? Every argument has been used ; whatever you can say, he hath akeady considered ; the best examples have been set before his eyes. He is convinced of all, he hath hearkened attentively to all the remonstrances that were ever made him, he hath exhausted, in a manner, the virtue of the sacraments ; and by his continual relapses he is not only accustomed, but hardened to all that ; inso- much that God might say to him as he said heretofore to his people : " Thy bruise is incurable, thy wound is very grievous." Jer.. XXX. Ah! sinner, what hast thou done, and to what an extremity art thou reduced ! By opening thy wounds, thou liast made them incurable; and the unction of ray grace, that powei-ful ON RELAPSE INTO SIN. 49 remedy for the conversion of others, hath not wherewithal to effect thy cure. 4thly. But let U3 trace it higher, and let us avow, Christians, that the extreme difficulty of truly repenting, after having relapsed, arises from the very nature of relapse, which is, of itself, pecuHarly repugnant to the grace of conversion. For, to the CAalness of sin, relapse adds the qualities of ingratitude and contempt : ingratitude for the benefit, or first pardon, already obtained, and of contempt for the Majesty of an offended God. Two obstacles to a second reconciliation. Ingratitude for the benefit, which consists, (says Tertullian,) not only in our forgetfulness of God's past mercy, but in our turning it against liim, to make it serve the purpose of sinning with impunity and greater audacity. And truly were we sure that the remission of sin which hath just been granted us, was the last of the graces which we had to hope for, and that the gates of mercy would forthwith be shut against us for ever and for ever, how prone soever we might be to passion, it were enough to restrain us, and keep us from relapsing. The very remedy, therefore, for penitence, is our inducement to licentiousness ; and as Tertullian speaks, the excess of God's clemency foments and nourishes the rashness of man. That is, we are bad, because God is good ; and, totally in opposition to the advancement of his cause, and the only means left for us to return to him, and to get, once more into the way of heaven, encourages us to indulge the irregularity of our passions. Now, beloved Christians, is it possible that God, being what he is, should not, as well for the merit of his grace, as the justification of his providence, have a special repugnance to be reconciled with us in that state ? Contempt for the Majesty and Sovereignty of God. For, not to lose sight of TertuUian's thought, what did the sinner by his first conversion, and by embracing penance ? He overturned, in his heart, the dominion of Satan, that God might reign there. And what doth he by relapsing into evil courses ? He expels God, to make way for the dominion of Satan in his heart. It looks as if a man, by his monstrous reciprocation of relapse and penitence, would make a comparison of the one with the other, and after trying both the one and the other, woiUd give sentence against God in behalf of his enemy, and make free choice of him in pre- ference to God. So that, (says Tertullian,) as his intention 50 ON RELAPSE INTO SIN. by penitence was to satisfy God, noAV by a penitence directly con- trary, a penitence in some shape of his very penitence, he spurns at God, and satisfies Satan. Now can anything make God more iiTCConcileable than such an outrage ? Any relapse is liable to entangle us in this misfortune, but particularly that which makes us go so far as to quit God absolutely, to make his service dis- gustful to us, to make us refuse submission to the yoke of his law : I mean that kind of relapse, by which we fall not only into sin, but into an attachment of it. It is a kind of apostacy : and in this light it is that the learned Estius, with many of the fathers, meant to represent the words of St. Paul : " It is impossible to be renewed again by penance." He maintained that this, though but moral, impossibility of returning to God by means of penance, was not the effect of ordinary relapses, which happen through surprise, through weakness, through frailty, but those glaring, those unmanly, wilful, deliberate relapses, which prove of bad consequence to a man's state of life, and which, after edifying and public conversions, dishonovir God's worship, and scandalize piety. This you know, Christians : and happy it is for you, if you have never found, by your own experience, how difficult and almost impossible a return to God is made by these inconstancies. And now. Christians, let us close this discourse with a two-fold inference. One regards those who have constantly persisted in the state of grace, since their return to God ; and the other is addressed to those sinners, who have deplorably relapsed into the way of iniquity, from which they had been rescued by the sacrament of penance. To the former we shall give the important advice, that the teacher of the Gentiles gave the Christians of Corinth : " He that thinketh himself to stand, let him take heed lest he fall." 1 Cor. X. Take heed, my brethren, and let the misfortune of so many Christians, who have been ruined by relapses, and who are every day ruined, be a moving lesson, and a powerful motive to excite your vigilance ? But what is the nature of this vigilance ? To know yourselves thoroughly, and to be fully apprised of the dangers which surround you. To know your weaknesses, your inclinations, your passions; in a word, to diffide in your own strength : for, yoiu* greatest security is a diffidence in yourselves. To be fully apprised of the dangers which surround you, in order to avoid them ; to shun the dangerous occasions of sin, to fly certain ON DIVINE GRACE. 51 company : for nothing can preserve yon, with the divine grace, more effectually than flight. We shall stir up and strengthen the hopes of the latter ; neither shall we, after using the strongest motives of intimidation, throw them into despondency. Where- fore, I exhort them, to make greater and more generous efforts than ever. Their conversion is difficult, but not absolutely impos- sible ; or, if it be absolutely impossible to man, it is not so to God, nor to his holy grace. Because it is possible, and moreover neces- sary, it must be undertaken ; and because it is difficult, it must be undertaken with a strong, a noble, and a generous resolution. Above all, I would advise both the one and the other to put them- selves under a faithful, clear-sighted, disinterested director ; to lay open their case to him, and follow his counsel ; not to fear being known by him, but rather to fear that he know them not suffi- ciently. Thus shall they hold out in a penitential state, if they have returned to it ; or, thus shall they return to it, if they have not held out. Penance will bring them in the way of salvation, and conduct them at length into the safe harbour of eternal happiness. SERMON XIX. ON DIVINE GRACE. " Jesus answered^ and said to her : If thou didst hut know the gift of God" John iv. This gift of God, beloved Christians, to which the Samaritan woman here spoken of by St. John was an entire stranger, and which the Savioiu- of men explained' and made known to her, is, according to all the fathers of the Church, and interpreters of the scriptm-es, the very grace of Jesus Christ. It is that grace, without which we can do nothing, and Avith which nothing is impossible to us ; that grace, by wliich (as the apostle says) Ave are what we are, if yet we be anything in the presence of God ; that grace 52 ON DIVINE GRACE. which enlightens us, which attracts us, which persuades us, which converts us ; that grace, which impels us to do good works, and -withholds us from evil; that grace, which enables us to merit heaven, and come to the possession of it ; that grace which operates in us, and Avith us, whatever we do for righteousness' sake, and which, by its efficacy, administers to us, in the order of salvation, not only in power, but will and action. This, beloved hearers, is the excellent gift, which it so much imports us to understand thoroughly ; a perfect gift, which comes to us from above, and is bestowed on us by the Father of Lights ; a gift superior to aU the gifts of nature, and in comparison with which St. Paul disregarded and considered as dirt all the gifts of fortune, the gift of gifts, which none but Jesus Christ could merit for us, and which we received from the infinite mercy and goodness of God. Of this gift, however, we are grossly ignorant ; and through a criminal ingratitude, are at no pains to come to the knowledge of it. Hence it is, that we receive it so often to no purpose ; and, far from employing it to the glory of God, and our own sanctifi- cation, we make it instrumental to our own perversion, and a con- tempt of God. For on this account it is that our Saviour says to us, as he said to the Samaritan : " If thou didst know the gift of God." Wherefore, Christians, let us endeavour, tliis day, to form a just idea of it ; let us endeavour to penetrate into the immense treasures of divine mercy, and measure, as much as in us lies, its height and depth. To dispose with sweetness, and execute with force, are the excellent properties which an inspired penman attributes to wisdom. But these properties (St. Augustin teUs us) are agreeable only to the wisdom of God, in the degree of perfection which is expressed by these words : " From end to end wisdom reacheth mightily, and disposeth all things sweetly." Wis. viii. And, indeed, the wisdom of men, being so very limited, is Hable to two quite con- trary defects. Is she sweet in her conduct ? There is reason to fear she will be weak in the execution. Is she firm in the execu- tion ? There is reason to apprehend she will be harsh in her con- duct. When sweetness predominates it sinks into timorousness, and force degenerates into excessive severity. To the wisdom only of God it appertains to unite perfectly these two virtues seemingly so opposite. For, she alone hath the advantage not only of at no time separating sweetness from force, but of making her force to ON DIVINE GRACE. 53 consist in her sweetness. Now what Holy Writ says of God's wis- dom, I may equally say of divine grace ; as the grace I speak of acts in us as in the instrument of that supreme wisdom which, in God, is the piincipal cause of our salvation. And this. Christians, is the clearest and justest idea I can give you of the grace of Jesus Christ ; these are its characteristics — sweetness and force : sweetness, in the engaging manner it dis- poses the sinner to conversion ; force, in the victories it gains over the sinner at the moment of conversion. Wherefore, Avithout entering into a farther discussion, it will suffice to instance both tlie one and the other in the Samaritan woman. For, you Avill perceive the amiable methods of grace in gaining that sinner, and its marvellous power in the admirable change which it wi-ouo-ht in her heart, " from end to end reaching mightily, and disposin^r all things sweetly." First, then, you shall see how the grace of Jesus Chiist useth all the delights and attractives of its sweetness, in order to convert the Samaritan woman. Secondly, how the grace of Jesus Christ, by its force and efficacy, converts the Samaritan woman, and, from the gulf of sin into which she was plunged, raises her, on a sudden, to the summit of righteousness. These two positions include the whole scope, and make the division of the following discourse. Part I. It is not at all surprising that sweetness should be the first characteristic of grace, which is the ongin of conversion, an immediate emanation from the goodness of God, and the "i-cat end to Avhich liis pm-e and heavenly love for us tends. But it stands us upon to know exactly in what this sweetness of grace consists, which are its insinuations, what it operates in us, and in what manner God would have us correspond with it. And this is evi- dently what the Holy Ghost willed to make known to us by the conversion of that woman, whose example it is our duty, on this occasion, to apply to ourselves. For, what doth gi-ace do, in order to subdue, entirely and completely, a rebellious heart, and make it yield obedience to the decrees of heaven ? St. Auoaistin, and other divines after him, denominate it victorious grace, and such in fact, it is. But the methods thereof differ widely from those of conquerors. In order to subdue us, it seems in some shape to submit to our will. Take not offence at this mode of speakiiK', VOL. II. E 54 ON DIVINE GRACE. which, as you shall see, is no way derogatory either from the dig- nity or from the efficacy of divine grace, and Avhich, in my appre- hension, implies its sweetness. I say, that it seems to submit to our will, it waits for us, and bears mth us whole years together. It is ever on the watch for favourable moments, and by a conde- scension which we can never sufficiently acknowledge, improves opportunities to gain us over. How much soever it is our interest to seek it, we are always prevented by it. Instead of taking forcibly, it asks placidly what it means to obtain ; and instead of demanding haughtily and superciHously, it obtains only by solicitation and invitation. It asks (says St. Prosper) in order to give ; and asks but httle, in order to give much. It accommodates itself to our inchnations, oiu: talents, our endowments of mind ; and often, after the manner I am going to relate, to our imperfections and weaknesses. It imposes no difficult obligation on us, to which attractives are not annexed, and of which it creates not, notwith- standing our repugnance, a desu'C in our breast ; for it commands us to despise the good things of this life, in proportion only as it shows their futility ; makes us undertake great things lor God, only by impressing our minds with a high idea of his perfections, and of the rewards which he promises ; induceth us to renounce and hate ourselves, only by making us allow, from a view of our misdeeds, that this renunciation at least is just, and this hatred well-founded. Such, beloved Christians, is the economy of gi'ace, such its sweetness ; and such we see clearly is the procedure of our Saviour in the conversion of the Samaritan. A conversion which Christ proposes as a plain and obvious tyi)e of that which passes, day after day, by the mighty agency of his_. divine grace, between God and ourselves. Give ear, while I resume each article in order. There will be ample matter for your instruction and edification : 1st. I say that oftentimes grace waits for sinners, so as to tire out the patience of God. Behold Jesus Christ, the very force and power of God himself, weary, nevertheless, his spirits exliausted, in a pensive posture on the brink of a well. What doth he wait for ? An infidel soul whom he means to save ; a sinner whom he hath chosen. And with what is he wearied ? If we adhere to the letter, Avith the length of his journey : *' wearied with his jom-ney." John iv. But as this God-man declared to his apostles in the same gospel, that he had meat to eat, to an infinite degree ON DIVINE GRACE. 55 more exquisite than that Avhich they presented him, mysterious and divine meat, of which they were ignorant : "I have meat to eat which you know not of;" (John iv. ;) so did he undergo quite a different fatigue from what outwardly appeared ; a fatigue arising, beyond all doubt, from having so long borne with this miserable wretch in her criminal habit. For it must (says St. Augustin) have tired him out, and, in a great measure, have exhausted his patience. Yet he is not discouraged ; and how distant soever this woman may be from the ways of God, how hardened soever in her sinful courses, he determines to wait for her, using in her behalf, if I may venture to employ the scripture plu-ase, those adorable delays, the delays of God, which keep back his anger, suspend his justice, and withhold his vengeance. On this account it was, that wearied, he sat. Now this uneasiness of God, notwith- standing the passions and revolts of his creature, is that which I call the sweetness of grace. Ah I Christians ! how many sinners, all over the world, and per- haps among those to whom I address myself at this very time, in the same situation as was that criminal and obstinate woman ? That is, how many sinners, inflexible in their ways, have quitted God, have spurned at his goodness, and have provoked his wrath ; and, by continually accumulating sin upon sin, and lapse upon lapse, and thereby increasing, -without intermission, the Aveight of their iniquity, have become, as it were, a heavy burden on the hands of God — but still whose return his inexhaustible mercy con- descends to wait for ? To judge of the ways of God by the ways of men, perhaps his patience might be deemed a scandal, as the suffering on the cross was to the Jews ; perhaps we might take it into our heads that he was wanting in zeal for his own glory, and that he did not maintain the sovereignity of his being with suffi- cient rigour. But tliis (say the fathers) is the very same thing by which he maintains it, and displays his glory ; for none, but the patience of a God could arrive to so great a pitch. The patience of men, which is circumscribed by the narrow circumference of their heart, is soon at an end ; but the measure of God's patience is the gi-eatness of himself. God is great, (says St. Augustin,) because he is eternal, because lie is mighty, because he is God. And mdeed nothing, if rightly considered, can be a stronger, or more convincing testimony of liis dignity, than that tranquillity Avith which he beholds, and e2 56 ON DIVINE GRACE. suffers the ofFences of mankind. But, from this principle, beloved hearers, what conjecture ought to be deduced ? Doth it foUow tliat the sinner can pretend to a right of putting oif his conversion, and obliging the Almighty Lord to wait, because he is willing ? In tills manner libertines and worldlings have reasoned in all ages, and do still reason ; and it Is this false reasoning and hellish pre- sumption which confii'med them in all ages, and do still confirm them in their libertinism and vices. But God forbid. Christians, that we should make so perverse a use of his mercies ! And when- ever repentance is the point in hand, the most pernicious error we fall into is, to imagine that God, in his goodness, will wait for us. This is supported by a thousand arguments, strong and conclusive, of which a Christian cannot be Ignorant, at the same time, of the most essential and received maxims of his religion. These are they : because if God waits for us, it is solely to his grace that we are indebted for it. Now nothing is more impious, notliing more senseless, than so to count upon that grace, as to avail one's self of it against God himself: " Is thine eye evil, because I am good?" Matt. XX. Because there are many for whom God waits not, and on whom, in order to strike others with terror, he is pleased to exercise lils avenging wrath, by letting them die in then- sin : "I go, and you shall seek me, and you shall die in your sin." John vlii. Because with regard even to those whom God waits for, after the expiration of a certain time, he will not wait : " As yet forty days, and Nineve shall be destroyed." Jonas ili. Because it is uncer- tain how long God will wait, no secret being equally impenetrable to us, or hidden from us: "Who knoweth that God will turn and forgive." Jonas Hi. Because our presumption alone, in pro- mising ourselves that God will wait for us, is a sufficient induce- ment to make him not wait for us, lest his patience, (as TertuUIan rightly observes,) which is one of his divine attributes, should serve to authorize and foment our crimes. All these, beloved Christians, are incontestable truths, which should make us observe a judicious mien between fear and affiance ; truths, which indeed administer hopes of a grace sufficiently constant to wait for us, but which hinder us from Indulging those hopes In such a manner as to live in impenitence ; truths, the wonderful concatenation of which obllgeth us not to make God wait too long, persuaded, Indeed, that as yet he will wait for us, but that notliing, however, is so tcmble as a God, whose abused patience is wearied out with waiting ON DIVINE GRACE. 57 tlic return of a sinner, or more punishable than a presumptuous sinner, who voluntarily and deliberately makes God wait for him. This point of doctrine would alone require an entire discourse ; but I proceed to another. 2ndly. The Saviour of the world not only waits for the Sama- ritan woman, but, by a fi'esli instance of that sweetness Avhich is discoverable in his grace, takes a favourable opportunity of con- ferring with her ; a place separate from noise and tumult, Avhither he foresees she Avill shortly repair ; a time convenient for this godly design, when she came to draw water, and Avhen notliing coidd inteiTupt the divine lessons which he prepared to give her. Not that God hath occasion for contrivances of this nature to commu- nicate his grace, nor that the grace of Jesus Christ absolutely depends upon occasions and opportunities, to produce its effects ; whereas, on the contrary, it is grace that seizes the precious times of salvation, and opportunities to which our conversion is annexed. But ought we not in this to admire the ineffable goodness of God, who to draw us to his service, and to save our souls, is desirous to lay hold of the fittest opportunities ; who, with that view, advan- tageously makes use of those we offer him ; who gives, himself, occasion to many that never could have entered into our minds ; who shows, by events the most unexpected and unforeseen, his providential care of us, and though equally deserving to be served in all places, and at all times, thinks it not beneath him to annex his grace to certain times and places. When we read in Genesis, that Rebecca, going with her flock to water, met a servant who made her good fortune known to her, and mentioned the choice which God had made of her, to be the consort of Isaac ; or in the Book of Kings, that Saul, going in quest of his father's asses, lit upon the prophet, who declared to him the views of God in his regard, and that the Lord had des- tined him to be the head of his people, we bless the amiable dispo- sition of Providence. But this so amiable a disposition. Christians, is nothing but the type of what God would do, and what he doth every day in behalf of his elect. For is it not in this manner that he offers them his grace in favourable conjunctures? Is it not in this manner (if I may so express myself) that he lies in wait for them, and lays holy ambush, on certain occasions, wliich his infi- nite wisdom hath ordained, for their conversion and sanctification ? And was it not for this reason that manv virtuous and learned 58 ON DIVINE GRACE. divines (among whom is counted that incomparable doctor of the church, St. Augustin) made the mystery of grace — I mean that grace which we call efficacious — to consist in this partly, that it is imparted to us on occasions on which Almighty God foresees it will be salutary? Whereas, (continue they,) he dispenses his ordinary graces indifferently ; that is, totally independent of cer- tain circumstances and particular dispositions, in which we may be at the time we receive them. This doctrine is agreeable to that which the Holy Ghost tells the righteous man, the converted sinner : " In an accepted time have I heard thee, and in the day of salvation have I helped thee." 2 Cor. iv. There are, therefore, (conclude they, and with great reason,) in the predestination of men, times of grace and favour, in which salvation is not only more possible and easy, but more infalUble and certain. This is apparent in the Samaritan woman. But if we consider it in the true light, we shall find that our own case is parallel to hers. For, where is the man whom God hath moved by his holy inspirations, and recalled from the ways of sin and perdition, who will not attribute his conversion, in part, to some certain incidents, and who doth not recollect, that it was on those occasions that God opened liis eyes, and spoke to his heart? Of this St. Augustin was thoroughly assured ; and the avowal he made of it was a kind of homage he thought due to grace. It is in his " Confessions," that he points out, himself, every particular of the conflict he underwent ; the trouble and agitation of mind he was in, the soli- tary garden into wliich he withdrew, the pious good friend who accompanied him thither, the example of the anchorets which put him to confusion, the passage of St. Paul which he read, and which planted daggers in his heart ; when at last, this all-powerful gi-ace transformed him into a new man, and made him yield submission, and give himself up to the pressing solicitations of the heavenly Spirit — thus he published it. And if we were to make a similar confession, might we not, in proportion, bear a like testunony to our own occurrences ? Which then, in our regard, is the capital point, and grand maxim of Christian wisdom ? Imprint it in your minds, beloved hearers, and preserve the remembrance of it. It is diligently to watch, and not to let slip these favourable occasions. For how many things, the consequences of which are hidden from you, and wliich, to judge by appearances, are owing to chance, are so many means ON DIVINE GRACE. 59 which God hath chosen to withdraw you from the world, and on which, for aught you know of his will, he is pleased to make your predestination depend ? For instance : the intercourse you hold with that servant of God, that .pious book of which you relish the reading, that edifying and convincing sermon which you hear, that sudden death of your friend which terrifies you, that loss of an estate which brings you to distress, that disgrace which humbles you, that infirmity which obliges you, against your will, to lead a regular life, and hinders you from running into former excesses. If the designs of God Avere fully known to you, and you were cer- tainly apprized that to this was annexed your eternal welfare, would you not be careful to make the best advantage of these occasions ? Now you know enough of it at least to adore the secret decrees of that paternal Providence which governs you ; and if you know no more, it is incumbent on you to spend your days in a more absolute dependance on that grace in which you place your confidence. But you wlU teU me : if God hath annexed the grace of my con- version to this occasion, I shall certainly be converted. Granted, Christians : but it is equally certain, that you will never be con- verted without making good use of grace, and the circumstances which it hath prepared for you. For, whatever the nature of that grace may be, it is an article of faith, that its effect can never be separated from yom' faithfulness ; and in whatever manner it may be said to act, we must always recur to these two Avords of our blessed Saviour — watch and pray. Pray, because you are unable to do anything without grace ; and Avatch, because grace, all-poAV- erful as it is, will do nothing for you Avithout yom* concurrence. Pray, to the end that there may be a day of salvation for you ; and Avatch, to the end that this day of salvation may not escape you. These are the two particular points — this the Avhole sub- stance of a Christian's theology. But to proceed. 3rdly. I add, that the grace Avhich works our conversion, how much soever it imports us to solicit it, is ever sure to prevent our solicitations : and this, according to the doctrine of the fathers, is its most essential quality. For, were I able to prevent it, it Avould be no longer a grace, because it Avould suppose in us the merit of preventing it. I knoAV that through grace avc may, though sinners, seek God, and find him. But never should Ave seek him (says St. Bernard) tlu'ougli gi-acc. 60 ON DIVINE GRACE. had he not himself condescended to seek us. Now this is plainly seen in the conversion of the Samaritan. The Son of God waits not till she makes some advances toward coming to him, but accosts her, talks Avith her, engages her in such a manner that she doth not perceive it, in a conversation which is to be the principal cause of her salvation. Such is the mystery, and prodigy too, of Almighty God's love ! He is desirous himself to prevent sinners : that is, he desu*es to seek vile creatures, to call rebellious and ungrateful souls to his service, criminal souls and deserving of his vengeance, weak and inconstant souls, whose infidelity and relapses he foresees : to seek them, I say, and be before hand with them, and, at a time, too, when they think not of him : I say more ; at a time when they revolt from him, when they make head against him, when they have, in some shape, a disgust and horror of him. Ah ! my Lord, might I cry, affected with the same sentiment as the pious St. Bernard, and applying to myself that tenet of our re- ligion so opposite to Pelagianism. Ah ! Lord, is it then true, that of myself I am unable to love you, quite amiable as you are ; and that such is my wretchedness, as to deny me the power of wishing to be loved by you, if you raise not, youi'self, that desire in my heart ? Is it then true, that though you are the Almighty God, you are under a necessity of making the first step toward my reconciliation to you, or of suffering me to remain eternally your enemy? Would it not be enough that you were disposed to receive me ? But at least, my God, since you are -wilUng to begin, shall I not have the happiness of con-esponding vnth. your love ? Shall I add to the unfortunate inability of preventing you, the unpardonable crime of not siding -with you ? No, my Lord, you make me too clearly see how much I am indebted to you, for my heart to remain in so mortal an indifference. As it is for the merit of your holy grace that it should first seek me, I will readily and ■willingly submit to that law. Yes, my God, I desire to humble myself with that view ; I desire to acknowledge my weaknesses in your presence, and to blush at the thought, that I cannot, of myself, take a single step in order to come to you ; and that, not- withstanding your infinite perfections, I am incapable to love you, unless you love me first. However, O Lord, it will be a powerful motive of gratitude and faithfulness: and the remembrance of of your infinite mercy in seeking me, notwithstanding my unwor- thiness, and in bringing me back into your holy ways, will hence- ON DIVINB GRACE. 61 orward attach me so strongly to you, that neither nature, nor passion, nor world with all its charms and allurements, nor any thing else, be it what it will, shall ever dissolve the sacred union. Such is the fruit Avhich a Christian soul must draw from a profit- able and solid consideration on this point of faith. 4thly. But further : in what manner doth grace j)revent us ? Authoritatively and imperiously ? No, says the prophet. On the contraiy, " it prevented us Avith the blessings of sweetness." Ps. xx. For if it prevent us, it is only by asking what it means to obtain ; and in this (says St. Prosper) consists the difference between the law and grace : the law commands, and grace invites ; the law con- strains, and grace engages. Now this coalition of the law and grace makes the whole mystery of the amiable and supreme domi- nion which God hath over our heai-ts. Our Saviour might have chosen to use liis divine power, and obliged the Samaritan to pay him, instantly and without reply, a forced obedience. But as it is his grace that operates in her, he will have her not only obey without repugnance, but with joy and love. How then doth he begin ? By desiring her to hearken to his words, and believe : " Woman, believe me." John iv. For although God, by the effiacy of his grace, be master of our will, and may do "vvith us according to his pleasure, he is backward, however, in the use of his power ; and, if I may venture to use a scripture phrase, treats us with respect : that is, he inspires us, persuades us, asks us to conform our will to his : " Thou, the ruler of virtue, with great reverence disposest of us." Wis. xxii. I say more : though absolute master, he asks but a little, in order to give much. What doth Jesus Clu'ist ask of the Sama- ritan ? A little water : " Give me to drink." And why water ? In order to raise in her a desire of an infinitely more excellent water, which he intends to give her ; a salutary and vivifying water : " a fountain of water springing up unto everlasting life ;" (John iv. ;) water that will quench om* thirst eternally, and settle us in peace and felicity : " Whosoever shall drink of the water which I shall give, shall not thu-st for ever." A noble idea this. Christians, of what daily experience informs us of concerning the methods of grace. What doth it require ? scarce anytliing : a little attention to ourselves, a little regularity in our actions, a little discretion in our words, a little constraint in the pei-formancc of our duty. Give me this, (says God) it is certainly but little ; yet ujwn this little 62 ON DIVINE GRACE. the most abundant and efficacious graces depend. And, indeed, it is often by this Httle, I mean by this little \'ictory over passion, by this little violence done to humour, by this little sacrifice of temporal interest, by this little effort of Clu-istian charity, by this little defalcation of worldly vanity, that we put oiu*selves in a con- dition to receive a plenitude of heavenly gifts, and the mercies of the Lord. It is by this that great changes and conversions begin ; and are we not in a high degree to blame, if we obstinately refuse that which God requires, when the advantage which he promises so far exceeds that which he requires ? 5thly. Proceed we, however, to a more affecting article. I hold with St. Chrysostom, that grace, in order to act with more sweetness, suits itself to our inclinations, to our taste, to our talents, and in some shape to our weaknesses, our imperfections, and our faiHngs. Of this I have proof oi" the woman of Samaria already mentioned. Any one, but the Saviour of mankind, who had heard her dispute, and reason upon the most important points of rehgion, would have soon discouraged her, would have told her that it was not her business to dive into those matters ; that those knotty, those refined, those subtile questions, were not her province ; that it much better became a woman to know nothing of them : for vnth. this tnte, overbearing answer, have curious women been at all times foiled ; an answer, on which the men are wont to to lay great stress. But our Saviour knew that they were not converted by such means ; and that, far from reforming them, it soured their tempers, and made them more irritable. What then doth he do ? He behaves in a manner directly contrary. This is a vain and curious woman, and he takes the advantage of her curiosity. She rates herself high for her knoAvledge and parts, and he deigns to argue vnth her on the most profound and sublime topics of religion. In instructing the vulgar, he made use of parables, that is, of plain and familiar comparisons, adapting his discourse to theu- gross understandings. But as to this woman, sinner as she is, he converses with her in terms proportioned to the grandeur and intricacy of the subject on which their conversation turns : the natm-e of God, the perfection of his being, the purity of his worship, adoration in spirit ; and thereby undeceives her, without offending her, and removes the erroneous notions she had conceived relating to the Deity and the homage due to him. Now is it not thus, that our minds and hearts are influenced by ON DIVINE GRACE. 63 grace ? Is it not in this manner that it conforms itself to us, scarce ever sanctifying us — (mind this I beseech you) — scarce ever sanctifying us in a manner contrary to our natural inclinations, but perfecting them agreeably to God's holy will, in order to sanctify us. Are we quick and impetuous ? It animates us with zeal, and impels us to the practice of good works. Are we tender, and susceptible of being easily moved ? It inspires us with a tenderness of love for God, which not infrequently occasions our shedding floods of tears. Are we of a gentle and easy temper? It rectifies it, and converts it into charity for our neighbour. Are we of a rigid and severe disposition? It converts tliis severity into penitential fervour. St. Peter tells us, that it assumes as many different shapes, as it meets with different dispositions in us: "The grace of God is manifold;" (1 Pet. iv. ;) grace, which induces us to be holy in the manner we should choose to be, did Almighty God leave it to om' OAvn option, and it were to be the result of our o^vn dehberation ; to the end, (says St. Chrysostom,) that under no pretext we be dispensed with from following it, as it desires to make use of our own endow- ments for the compassing of its ends ; as it sets whatever is in us on work to bring about our salvation ; as it requu-es no other con- stitution but our own, no other complexion or disposition but our own, no other talents or genius but our own, to bring us to be that which God would have us to be ; in short, as in a sense which you sufficiently understand, we may, without ceasing to be what we are, become, by means of it, what we are not. 6thly. True it is, Christians, God obligeth us by this grace to despise all those things which the world esteems ; to renounce from our heart the honours, the pleasures, the good things of this world ; but herein " taste and see that the Lord is sweet." Ps. xxxiii. He doth not oblige us to renounce the world, before he hath made kno^vn to us, by his grace, its deceitfidness, and con- vinced us that it is impossible it should ever make us happy. He doth not oblige us to renounce the world, before he hath expelled from our heart, by his grace, our esteem and love of it. Now it is no hard matter to bid adieu to that which Ave neither esteem nor love. This is the lesson which our Saviour gives the Sama/- ritan woman: "Whoever shall drink of this water, shall thirst again." John iv. That is, whoever is ambitious of honours in this world, how great soever his station may be, shall never be content 64 ON DIVINE GRACE. to be what he is ; whoever endeavours to accumulate wealth, how full soever his coffers may be, shall never have enough to sate his desires ; whoever is a slave to sensual appetites, how willing soever he may be to gratify them, shall never satisfy them. When once I am persuaded of this principle, I wean my affections from created tilings without reluctance. And are we not invincibly persuaded of it by the divine impression and lights of grace ? Sometimes, indeed, it obliges me to perform difficult and painful things for God ; but at the same time furnishes me with sufficient induce- ments, by the hope it gives me of the great, the inestimable things it promises: "If thou knewest (says our Saviour to this woman) the gift of God, and who it is that saith to thee, give me to drink." John iv. That is, Christians, if ye knew what God is ; if ye knew what he hath done and merited for you ; if ye knew what ye may expect from him ; if ye knew the magnificent rewards he hath reserved for the humble, for the poor, for those who suffer and who mortify their senses on his account : if ye knew all this, your courage would be proof against the severest trials ; and the heaviest crosses, with the sole view of being pleasing in his sight, would become not only supportable, but delightful. Now what but the grace of Jesus Christ informs us of all this ? It cannot, indeed, be denied that this grace inspires us, according to the gospel doctrine, with a hatred of ourselves ; but to inspire us with this evangelical hatred, it obligeth us to acknowledge our own meanness, our own unworthiness, our OAvn corruption, our own transgressions. Wlience we easily conclude that our true interest is, to hate oiu*selves in this life, if we intend to love ourselves for life everlasting. Thus the Son of God, to facilitate the repentance of the Samaritan sinner, makes her confess her crime ; and by the salutary shame which she conceives thereof, reduces her, almost without her perceiving it, to the necessity of accusing and con- demning her conduct, and by consequence of being converted, as it is in a sincere accusation and condemnation of one's self that true conversion consists. Such, dear Christians, is the agency of grace. In this manner, God, neither by the sovereignty of his dominion, nor by the sub- lime light of his divine understanding, but by the sweetness of his grace, and of his holy spirit, becomes master of our hearts. It Avas necessary, in order to gain the hearts of men, that the increated Avisdom of God should humble itself, and liis majesty should stoop ON DIVINE GRACE. G5 in the person of the Saviour. Now just so it is, after God's exam- ple, that we shall insinuate ourselves into the souls of men, and exercise in them a power the more absolute, as it Avill appear the less. It will not be by authority, much less by the haughty spirit of sway, or by the ascendancy which we shall take, or affect to take ; no, nor by superiority of abilities or understanding, but by the sage contrivances of Christian charity. To win our neighboiu-, and to move his heart, we must bear with his ftiilings, compas- sionate his weaknesses, submit to his humours, be affected with his wants, take share in his concerns, and (according to the rule and expression of St. Paul) "put on, as the elect of God, the bowels of mercy." Colos. iii. This practical doctrine is applicable to us all ; but to us particularly, beloved brethren, whom God hath called, in a special manner, to the ministry, for the conversion and sanctification of souls : to us, who, as priests of tlie heavenly Lord, are the dispensers of his grace, and are bound, by conse- quence, to regulate our conduct by the methods of grace. To us, I say, this doctrine is addressed ; and therefore allow me to apply it to you, and to myself too, as it is a perfect model for all who are employed in our charitable functions. By sweetness it is, that our zeal can affect the hearts of sinners. Any other means will fail of success. What, though you were endued with the knowledge of the doctors, and the eloquence of the prophets ; what, though you should speak the language of the apostles, and even the language of angels ; if it were not seasoned with evangelical mildness, it would httle avail. Mildness it is, that must open the way for us to the hearts of men ; without wliich we shall instruct them, convince them, perplex them, terrify them, but shall not convert them. We shall disturb consciences, drive the weak to despair, and exasperate the obstinate ; but shall not bring them over to the service of God. The Saviour of the world appeared severe only with regard to the Pharisees ; hypocrites, Avho, under the mask of piety, imposed upon the people ; and by God's secret judgment, it was only with regard to them that his zeal was of none effect. I would not, however, my brethren, insi- nuate, that we should hide from sinners the deformity of their case, (you know how much I abhor such sentiments,) or should not oblige them to undergo the austerities prescribed by the gospel : the rigours of penitence, the cnicifying of the flesh, the mortifi- <*-ation of the senses. Wo is me, if in this doctrine I relax a tittle. 66 ON DIVINE GRACE. But to this severity, which alienates the thoughts of sinners from conversion, we must join mildness, in order to reclaim them. We must use it in the manner that grace adapts itself to the various dispositions of various persons, and not apply it Avithout prudence or discernment — to some too much, to others too little ; to some in a way unsuitable to their state, to others, in a degree exceeding their strength. We must not be wanting in pious addresses to induce them to take up with it, and even make them relish it ; showing them that it is impracticable, and never carrying things to that excess, as to give the laity a handle to treat them as impossible. We must then use severity in the cure of souls ; but it must be a discreet, an amiable severity, a severity that renders God's yoke supportable, and not a Pharai- saical severity without unction, an imperious severity, a severity agreeable to the condition of slaves, but no way suitable to the children of God. I would to God, brethren, that this truth were rooted in all their minds, as nothing could more eifectually contri- bute to the sanctification of the Christian world. Be that as it may, beloved hearers, one thing there is which will render us inexcusable at the judgment of God, and that is, the infinite sweet- ness with which he governs us. If the powers of the earth, upon whom we depend, behaved so to us, they would soon be our idols. God Almighty would gain us by liis holy grace, and yet we rebel against him. It remains for me to show, that this holy grace, though sweet in its manner of influencing the sinner, is not the less forcible in its action and impulse, which will manifestly appear from the sequel of the passage already mentioned, and which I am going to set forth in the second part. Part II. How obscure soever faith may be, considered in itself, and in regard to its mysteries, its motives are founded (according to the universal opinion of divines) in a kind of evidence. My meaning is, that what it reveals is evidently credible, from the quality of the motives which oblige us to believe it. Now I have always thought, and still do think, that of these motives, one of the most powerful and convincing is, to see what the power of divine grace sometimes operates in souls, whom God (as the great apostle tells us) hath chosen and predestined to be vessels of his mercy. This, beloved hearers, will be a comfort to you. When Pharaoh's magicians saw the astounding prodigies that Moses per- tormed all o^er Egypt by the touch only of his mystical rod, which ON DIVINE GKACE. 0« struck them with such terror, they confessed at last that " it was the finger of God." Exod. viii. That is, they discovered the cha- racteristic of a divine power, of which this legislator and prophet was the instrument. And for my part. Christians, though I were to consider no more than the conversion of the Samaritan woman, as related in the gospel, I should certainly conclude Avithout demur, that there is in us an active supernatm'al principle ; that God hath secret invisible springs to move our hearts, and wind them as he pleases ; that we receive from heaven impressions which only pro- ceed from grace, and that by the divine operations of" this grace, our liberty, without losing its indifferency and privileges, is per- fectly submitted to the power of God. Now in what consists the miracle of this extraordinary conversion? In the relation it bears to the two powers of the soul, to which internal grace is immediately communicated ; namely, to the undei- standing and to the will ; or, if you like that better, to the mind and to the heart. A miracle of grace, in the victory which it gains over the mind of the Samaritan. A miracle of grace, in the change which it works in the heart of the Samaritan. A miracle of grace, attended mth circumstances which leave no room to doubt that it was the work of the omnipotent hand of God. Redouble your attention, beloved hearers, and thereby make up for the defi- ciency arising from the necessity of contracting into a small com- pass, a subject that would requu-e a whole discourse. 1st. A miracle of grace, and of its force in the victory which it gains over the mind of the Samaritan woman. Only follow the thread of the sacred narrative, and you will agree to this. She was an infidel and a heretic, both together, as the Samaritans (according to Origen's remark) were idolaters in the main, con- tinuing to adore the false gods of their ancestors, and yet practised, at the same time, a kind of Judaism, but a Judaism con'upted by their particular opinions ; and accordingly they were separated by an avowed schism from the rest of the Jews : " For the Jews had no communication with the Samaritans." John iv. A heretic she was, vain and self-sufficient, opinionative and untractable, prepos- sessed with her error, and determined to maintain it, and pretending to argue with subtility and refinement upon religious topics ; for, all this appears from the conversation that passed between her and Christ. Now you know the difficulty, the extreme difficulty, or rather moral impossibility, of making any one submit, particularly 68 ON DIVIITE GRACE. a woman, and a woman too of this cliaracter. You know how unusual it is to see a woman, prepossessed with eiTor, (1 say pre- possessed, for persuaded by argiiment she scarce ever was,) take proper measures to sift out the truth, and after candid researches, yield ready submission to it. Whether it be that creating inflexi- bility and obduracy of heart, is, by a woful fatality, peculiar to heresy ; or that God, by a punishment due to this sin, which is, in one sense, the most grievous and punishable of all, is accustomed to overcast the mind with a cloud, which perpetually darkens it more and more, and which, for that reason, St. Augustin denomi- nates penal blindness : hoAvever it be, you cannot be ignorant what efforts are requisite, and how it borders on a miracle, even in the order of grace, to return from the pride of heresy to the humility of the faith. Nevertheless, we now see, that gi-ace doth all this by a divine vu'tue, a virtue beaming from the mercy of God. Christ converts this woman : he induces her first to embrace the purity of the Jewish worship, and fortliAvith she becomes a perfect Christian. After having made her renounce the superstitious prac- tice of her forefathers, and the schism she was brought up in ; after liaAang made her condemn the errors which she maintained with such obstinacy and zealous attachment, he makes knoAvn to her what he is, and for what end he came ; the scope of his legis- lation, the natm'e and quality of Messiah and Saviour, and his very divinity : mysteries naturally incredible, and which she could not discover but by means of the most pure and heavenly light of the grace imparted to her. Not only he reveals to her all these points, so important and so sublime, but convinces her of them, and gives her a relish for them. Though at first she declined con- versing with him, she listens to him, at length, with docility and respect. Though every one, born of Jewish extraction, was hateful in her sight, she is wilKng, nevertheless, to acknowledge and adore him, Jew as he is, as the author of her salvation. Though what- ever she sees in him hath the appearance of man, she protests and firmly believes he is the Christ, and the true Son of God. Must we not confess, that such a conversion was the work of the Lord, and cry out with David : " This change is made by the right hand of the Most High." Ps. Ixxvi. 2ndly. But grace, in subduing the mind of the Samaritan, acted not more powerfully than in moving her heart. For beside her obstinacy in fiilse belief, she was lewd and libertine in her moral ON DIVINE GRACE. 69 conduct. Sins, (says St. Chrysostom,) Avhich, however opposite, bear a kind of affinity one to another ; because obstihacy in erro- neous principles of religion is, properly speaking, a corruption of the mind, in the same manner that adultery and impurity are a rebeUion of the flesh. Now God, (continues the same holy doctor,) the avenger and punisher of the one and the other, oftentimes dis- graces the one by the other, by permitting revolts of the mind against truth, to be commonly followed by depravity of manners, and a fleshly life. And truly it is observable, that those so pre- sumptuous and haughty souls in matters of reUgion, for the most part, are not the most steadfast in their duty, nor the most resolute in the horn* of temptation. Such, with her affected knowledge and subtilty, was the sinner of Samaria. She publicly cohabited with unmarried men, was abandoned to concubinage, a concubinage of which she had con- tracted a long and scandalous habit : " Thou hast had five husbands, and he whom thou now hast, is not thy husband." John iv. Now no disease is equally unsusceptible of cure vdth this. If there be a demon capable of resisting God and his grace, it is beyond dispute, the spirit of impurity. And yet herein, too, the grace of Jesus Christ shows Its power and efficacy. This sinner, this prostitute, this woman — a slave to infamous passions — is cleansed from sin and robed with sanctity. It would seem as if Christ had given her another heart; and after taking from her that corrupted heart, the source of all her trespasses, he created in her a new heart, a heart not only purified from all the filth of sin, but from earthly affec- tions. She no longer is that bare-faced cause of scandal, that incen- tive to wickedness, that lure held out by the ghostly enemy of mankind for the ruin of souls. She is " a new creature in Christ;" a soul entirely consecrated to God, and breathes nothing but his love ; a soul whose thoughts are chaste, whose Avords are modest, whose actions are free from inordinate passion : a soul, whose con- duct is a perfect pattern of subUme virtue, that diffuses on all sides the odour of her sanctity. What a prodigy, Christians ! And ought we not, accordingly, to repeat the prophet's words : " This change is made by the right hand of the Most High ?" Srdly. If the grace of Jesus Christ works a miracle in the con- version of this woman, the miraculous manner in which it doth work it, shows very evidently its force and power. For, beloved Christians, is it not astonishing, that two such prodigious changes VOL. II. F TO ON DIVINE GRACE. as these should be no more to our Saviour than the business of a moment ? When God acts according to the laws and the ordinaiy course of his providence, he proceeds, or seems to proceed with caution, and accomodates himself in the natural as well as super- natural order of things to our weakness. For he makes not men saints all at once ; he sanctifies them gradually, and leads them by progressions, sometimes imperceptible, and step by step, to the summit of perfection, and a consummate sanctity. But when he acts sovereignly, and as the God of heaven, it is quite otherwise. He makes no previous alteration in the person Avhom he chooses for the subject of his agency. By one word's speaking, he calls forth myriads of beings out of naught ; expands the heavens ; fixes the earth ; gives to this vast universe all its perfection : " He spoke, and they were made." Ps. cxlviii. Thus, the Son of God says but a word to the Samaritan, " I am He" — (John iv.) — the Mes- siah whom you expect ; and behold ! all at once she is convinced, she is moved ; her heart is pierced with the most holy, the most lively, the most tender sentiments. A word (says St. Augustin) more efficacious than that with which Almighty God created the world. A word, w^hich by a second, and much more admirable creation than the former, reformed in her heart the work of God which sin had destroyed. I say a creation more admirable than the former, inasmuch as in the former the non-existence on which God operates, obeys his word without contradiction ; whereas, in the latter, the nonentity of sin, nonentity as it was, was capable to resist him. I ask if anything externally appeared, that could give our Sa- viour so strong an influence over the mind of the Samaritan woman? Or what means did he use to obtain so easy and speedy a belief? Did she see him at that moment exerting his power over storme and billows, giving sight to the blind, raising the dead of four days ? Ah ! beloved hearers, this is the wonder that exceeds all the rest. The conversion of the world without a miracle — were there such an hypothesis — would (according to St. Augustin) be the greatest of miracles, would be the miracle of miracles ; and the most convincing for a pagan who should obstinately disbeheve the other miracles. Now we see, beloved hearers, this miracle of mira- cles fulfilled in the Samaritan. The Pharisees and doctors of the law, every day saw the miracles of Jesus ; they were ocular wit- nesses to them ; they conversed with Lazarus AvhoTU he liad pub- ON DIVINE GRACE. 71 Hcly raised to life, and talked with innumerable incurables on whom he had bestowed health; notwithstanding which, through an inflexible wilfulness, they persisted to the last in their incredulity. But this woman, without any miracle, not only believes in him, but is attached to his doctrine, addicted to his service, and forsakes everything to walk in his footsteps. And whence arises all this ? From the omnipotence of grace, wliich needs only itself to gain a complete victory over the heart of man. This is not all. When our blessed Saviour converted sinners, it was after havmg gained, by singular benefactions, a great share of their love and confidence, and of their esteem for his sacred person. To save their souls, he began by curing their bodily infir- mities. He bore with their w^eaknesses, and brought them, by making them see in their necessities the power he had, to believe what he was. But being resolved to disj^lay in this sinner the great force of his grace, he converts her ■without any manner of attractive or interested inducement, save that of conversion. She beHeves not in him, like the woman of Canaan, because he deli- vered her daughter from the devil ; nor like the woman troubled with the bloody flux, because he restored her health of body. She believes in liim purely on his own account, and is attached to him without any other view of advantage than that of being his fol- lower, and living in his service. And here it is that I discern the characteristic of a victorious and all-powerful grace : " This change is made by the right hand of the Most High." In fine, from this the miraculous power of grace appears, that by sanctifying this woman, it sanctified the whole inhabitants of Samaria, as it enabled her to communicate the gift of fiiith to the Samaritan people. From a sinner, (according to the remark of St. Gregory,) she was changed into an apostle. Ere the apostles appear, she goes and announces Jesus Christ to those who know him not ; and without derogating in the least degree from the dignity of St. Peter, or of the other apostles, it may be said, that the first apostle of Christianity was the Samaritan woman. And indeed, her zeal is inflamed in such a manner, that she waits not for a moment : she leaves her vessel, forgets what she came for, departs from Jesus Christ for Jesus Christ's sake ; returns to town, and invites all the world to come and hear his words ; choosing rather to lal)0ur for his honour and glory, than enjoy any longer the pleasures of his converse ; and is hurried away, already, by the V 2 72 ON DIVINE GRACE. pacred fervency and divine impetuosity of the spirit of faith, which Id never content with the knowledge of God, if it spread not as wide as it can and ought to do it. And now, Christians, what inference to be made from all this ? Ah I let us not henceforward allege that our sinful state hath ren- dcred us weak, and that our weakness is an insurmountable obstacle to conversion ; let us own sincerely, that though weak of ourselves, Ave are all-powerful with the aid and by the force of grace, inas- much as we " can do all things in him who strengthened us." Phil. iv. Let us diffide in ourselves, but put our trust in God. I know that to free yourselves from the bondage of sin, to break off that intercom'se, to wave that connexion, to stifle that inclina- tion, it is requisite that you make extraordinary efforts, and undergo sharp conflicts. But be of good heart, since God declares that " his grace (whenever you ask it with candour) is sufficient for you." 2 Cor. xii. It is chiefly in your infirmity that its virtue blazes forth in all its lustre; and your return to God — a willing, a speedy, a perfect return, will not be a greater miracle of his grace than the wonderful change in the Samaritan sinner : " For power is made perfect in weak- ness." 2 Cor. xii. Besides — and tliis is the point of morality with which 1 shall conclude : God Almighty, of his mercy, hath drawn you out of the gulf; and if you have felt the impression of this grace, imitate the zeal of this edifying convert. She was, in all respects, as unqualified as you are to promulgate the gospel of God-made man ; she bore no character that laid her under a greater obhgation than you. What, therefore, should exempt you from the same duty ? In quality of Christians, we all lie under an indispensable engage- ment to participate, each in his own department, of the apostohc ministry ; and among all the faithful there is not one, of what pro- fession soever he be, who is not bound, at least by his works — by good example, by an edifying hfe, and by charitable counsels, to preach Jesus Christ. On a father it is incumbent to preach to his children, and to take with liim in his mind that he is their first apostle ; that it is liis province, as their father, to inspire them with rehgion, to tincture their minds with an early sense of it ; to use all his endeavours to preserve it in their souls ; otherwise, he deserves not the name of father, much less that of Christian. On a master it is incumbent to preach to his domestics, persuaded that (lis the apostle says in express terms) if he neglect so necessary and ON DIVINE GRACE. 73 essential a duty, and suffer liis household to remain in ignorniice of the law of God, or not to put it in practice, "he hath denied his faith, and is worse than an infidel." I Tim. v. But converted sinners ought to be, of all, the most strongly affected with this duty. This obligation comes on them upon the score of gratitude and justice — of charity to their neighbour, and their own interest ; and because they are unable by any other means to pay due tribute to Almighty God for their conversion. If, therefore, there were any among those who hear me, in this predicament ; that is, who heretofore led a Ubertine Hfe, but is now refonned by divine gi-ace, and resolved to square his actions and conduct to the Chiistian precepts : behold ! (would I say) dear Christian brother, the pat- tern which God lays to-day before you — the zeal and fervour of the converted Samaritan. Bring back, like her, as many sinners to Christ our Lord as your example can have weight and influence with, but especially the accomplices of your crimes and transgres- sions. Tell them, with David, that penitent king : " Come all and hear, and ye that fear God, and I will relate what great things he hath done for my soul." Ps. Ixv. You need no evidence but my example : I will make known the favour which his infinite mercy conferred upon me. I was entangled in the same engagements as you ; in the same excess and scandal as you ; but the grace of my God hath broken the chains with which I was bound, hath dissi- pated the clouds that had obscured my sight, hath extinguished the passions with which I was transported. Like you, I regarded as folly and weakness whatever was told me of eternal truths : but the grace of my God hath opened my eyes, and convinced me of my folly. Like you, I believed that the change would be impos- sible ; that I should never be able to fomi the resolution of quit- ting my criminal and inveterate habits ; that I should never be able to bear the irksomeness of a well-regulated and retired life ; that solitude and self-converse would be melancholy, tiresome, and insupportable : but by the grace of my God, all these difficulties are now removed ; I have subdued nature, and trodden custom underfoot ; I am totally disengaged from the world and its charms ; instead of the uneasiness and disgust which I feared, I have found tranquiUity of mind and joy of heart. And oh 1 that I cannot lay open my heart to you ! That I cannot discover and make you feel what 1 have felt, since first it was rescued from the tyranny of sin, and it began to enjoy the blessings of freedom ! " Come 74 ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. and hear, and I will relate what great things the Lord hath done for my soul." Ah ! Christians, what cannot one thoroughly converted do for the glory of God ! How forcible is his testimony in favour of the truth ! The Samaritan alone almost converted a whole coun- try : and how many sinners might reform, by their penitence, whole towns and cities! Inspu-e, O Lord, inspire this audience with that blessed zeal. Send down upon them your holy Spirit ; and, moved by his sweetness, and impelled by his force, may they return into your ways, and make those by their example retrnm into them, whom they have kept away from them by the scandal of their Hves ; and may we all, by these means, in due course of time, meet in the enjoyment of the same glory. SERMON XX. ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. *' When Jesus came near Jerusalem^ lie beheld the city^ and wept over it, saying : If thou hadst knoivji, even thou, the things belonging to thy peace !" Luke xix. That solemn day on which the Son of God, attended by his dis- ciples, made his public entry into Jerusalem, amidst shouts of acclamation : that day of the Lord's visitation, my brethren, was (according to Christ's o^vn words) the day of that incredulous city; as on that day of grace it was that the Saviour of men came to bring it fresh light, and to try, for the last time, to work its con- version. He foresaw the consequences of that unfortunate people's infidelity ; the extreme blindness into which they would fall ; the afflicting extremity to which too powerful an enemy would reduce them ; the dreadful storm, plunder, and desolation that would ruin their city, and disperse themselves throughout the globe; the hatred of all nations which they would incm*. Melancholy, indeed, but infallible eflfects of theu* resistance to the voice of heaven, and to the pressing insinuations of the divine mercy. These are the ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. "5 things which the Redeemer of Israel had in mind, and which he meant to prevent by softening and gaining their rebellious hearts. This figure, beloved Christians, excellently represents the ways of God with respect to sinners. For the sinner, however immersed in sin, hath days of salvation as well as Jerusalem, in which God prevents him, in which God speaks to him, in which he recalls him. This vigilant and sympathizing shepherd would save the strayed sheep that is going to throw itself down the precipice ; would bend the obstinacy of the hardened soul, and bring her back in order to preserve her from his vengeance. To this end it is, that he speaks to her, follows her, importunes her — not always, indeed, by the voice of his ministers, nor in any manner percep- tible to the eye, but secretly and by himself: I mean, by certain secret reflections with which he inspires her, and which feelingly strike her ; by certain inward reproaches which sting her, and give her disturbance. Ah ! beloved hearer, I would to God you dis- cerned, on these occasions, the gift of God ! I would to God you profited by that salutary uneasiness, which only tends to give peace to your souls ; "If thou hadst known the things belonging to thy peace !" To show you, therefore, the fruit you must draw from such uneasiness, and in the strongest terms to exhort you to beware of losing such fruit, is of the utmost consequence. Accord- ingly, it is what I purpose to treat of in this discourse ; I purpose to enlarge upon remorse of conscience. To intimidate the sinner by terrifying menaces, and, after sin, to raise in liis breast continual alanns — to depict in his mind the image of his vices, and, without intermission, to represent to him the whole deformity of them ; to allow him no rest, but incessantly ■to disquiet, to agitate, to torment him : is not this. Christians, to treat him as a foe, and to aim at his destruction ? But by a rule directly contraiy, I hold, and shall slioAv you that God, however offended and exasperated, cannot give a more solid testimony of his love to criminal man, than by creating and stirring up these latent remorses in the bottom of his heart. AVhcnce I infer, at the same time, that man, on his part, is never more culpable nor more unfor- tunate, than by resisting God in this holy assault, and not submit- ting to be overcome by the Master who wounds him only to cure him, and throws him down only to raise him up. Here, tlien. Christians, is the whole scope of this discourse. I say that remorse (b ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. is one of the most precious and most efficacious graces of God ; and from thence I infer, that not to yield to it, is, in sinful man, one of the greatest and justest causes of reprobation. Ne /er doth God act more favourably by the sinner, than when he presses him by the reproaches of his conscience ; and never doth the sinner offend God more sensibly, than when he shuts his ears to these reproaches, and refuses to hearken to them. In this discourse, therefore, I shall endeavour to show you, First, the mercy of God, in granting us that grace which oc- casions in our hearts a remorse of sin. Secondly, the malignity and misfortune of the man who obsti- nately resists this grace, in order to persevere in sin. These two heads are worthy of your attention. But if in this audience there are any sinners (and that there are I have reason to believe) at strife with their consciences, it is to them particu- larly I this day address myself. And by all the concern which I have, and which they themselves still more should have, for the salvation of their souls, I earnestly conjure them to apply their minds to a subject that regards them in a particular manner, and to which, perhaps, it hath pleased the Almighty to annex their conversion and eternal welfare. Part I. In order thoroughly to make you comprehend my meaning, and to give you a full knowledge of the first position which I purpose to make good, I shall here reduce it to a few pro- positions, which I beseech you to take exactly with you in your minds, for they are linked together, and have a necessary con- nexion with one another. I say, then, that the remorse which we feel after sin, is an inter- nal grace ; tha^ it is the first grace which God gives the sinner in order to his conversion ; that this is one of the most miraculous graces, if we duly consider the manner in which it is produced in man ; that it is, of all his graces, the most worthy of the greatness and majesty of God ; that there is no grace more constant, or less liable to withdraw itself from us ; that it is the grace which God most generally and most universally makes use of for our salvation; that this grace alone makes all other graces work upon oiu: hearts; that it is a grace of light more convincing and proper than any other to keep the mind in subjection ; in fine, that it is the most absolute and authoritative to bend the will and submit it to God. Could you have thought, beloved hearers, that in the reproach of ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. 77 conscience so many advantages and so great treasures had been included ? This, however, I am going to demonstrate ; and you shall see that this subject, how ban*en soever it may seem at first view, is extremely extensive, and one of the most copious. The proofs shall be drawn from principles of theology, but a theology in which you shall find nothing ii'ksome, and which will give me an opportimity of discussing a most edifying moral subject. At the moment we sin, we feel within ourselves a remorse of conscience, a reproach which it makes us for our having sinned. I say that this remorse is a grace ; and this is the ground on whicli are raised all the subsequent points of doctrine. For, what is gmcc ? And how many Christians are unacquainted with it, although they daily feel its influence ? Grace (say the schoolmen) is an aid and assistance which God gives man, to the intent he may fict and merit for heaven; and, if he be a sinner, may labour for his conversion. Now all this perfectly tallies with the synderesis, or remorse of conscience, which rises in the heart after sins committed. For, it is very certain that God is the author of it, that it is love which induces liim to stir it up in us, and that he uses it as a means to work om* conversion. Whence I infer, that this remorse includes all the qualities of a true grace, there is nothing more certain, than that God is the source from which it arises, inasmuch as the scripture declares the same thing to us in a thousand places. Yes, (says the Almighty, speaking to a sinner,) it is myself will reproach thee with the sinfulness of thy ci'ime. When, after committing it, thy conscience shall disturb thee, attribute thy dis- turbance of conscience to me, and to no other cause. A hundred times, after yielding to temptation, thou wouldst have hid thy shameful doings from thyself; thou turnedst away thy eyes, not to see thy sin ; thou flatteredst thyself that I would do the same, and fall in Avith thy notions : " Thou thoughtest wickedly that I was as thyself," (Ps. xlix.,) but thou art mistaken ; for, being thy Lord and thy God, I mil always declare myself to be thy accuser ; and as often as thou shalt commit an offence against me, I AviU, whether thou 'Nvilt or not, lay before thee thy iniquity in all its horrors : " I Avill reprove thee and set them do^vn before thy face." Ps. xlix. You see, Christians, how remorse of conscience originates with God. But what induceth him to excite it in us ? Paternal love, supreme goodness, and infinite mercy. And doth he not explain himself to the same puqiose to liis beloved disciple in the Rove- 78 ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. lation ? " Such as 1 love, I rebuke and chastise ;" (Apoc. iii. ;) and it is by chastising them that I show my love for them. But what occasion for other testimony than the word of our Saviour, when he announced to his apostles the coming of the Holy Ghost : " When he shall come, he wiU reprove the world of sin." John xvi. And by whom will it be reproved ? By the Spirit of Truth which I shall send to that piu'pose. And what means he by the Spirit of Truth ? The substantial love of the Father and the Son, the Divine Person who is charity itself. Observe, beloved hearers, that it is the love of God which reproves us when we are sinners : " He wiU reprove the world of sin." And now is there the least room to doubt that the remorse of our conscience is not a grace ? It is not an external, but an internal grace, as it is in the very bottom of our souls that this gnawing worm of remorse is formed. Wherefore the apostle of the Gentiles tells us, that God " hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into our hearts crying out." Gral. iv. This divine Spirit (as St. Augustin observes) cries out, not after the manner of a preacher, who speaks to us, and reproaches us with the viciousness of our life : for not all the preachers in the world have it in their power to probe the conscience ; and, how- ever, their words may strike the ear, they are far from pervading the human heart. But the Spirit of God, the better to be heard by us, holds, as I may say, his place in the centre of us ; and from thence, (says St. Augustin,) he incessantly cries out in opposition to oiu* passions, censures our pleasures, and condemns our sins. Ah ! Christians, can we carry our ingratitude to that pitch, as to think the contradiction of the holy Spirit an importunate rigour, and not confess, that it is a gift of his grace, a mercy on the sinner, a help to salvation, and a favourable means of bringing him back from the path of wickedness to the way of God ? Can we blindly suppose the sting which pains us an insupportable pain, and wish to be rid of it ? No, my Lord, we will never entertain such dan- gerous notions ; and as we are assured that it is your Spirit, the divine comforter, which raises these salutary remorses in us, we will always receive them as benefactions from your hand ; and, far from complaining, will only think of giving fresh proofs of our love and gratitude by our constancy and fidelity. But I proceed, and add, that of all the graces which God gives the sinner to work his conversion, remorse of conscience is the first and the chief. My meaning is this : only figure to yourselves, ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. 79 beloved Christians, how man, by sin, relapses into a kind of anni- hilation, whence God had drawn him by the grace of baptism and justification. That is, at the very instant that the soul is defiled with sin, she is devested of all merit, deprived of all right to heavenly glory, devested of all the virtues and gifts of the Holy Ghost, deserving to be despoiled of all the succours of grace, and, considered in a supernatural light, finally reduced, as it were, to annihilation ; so that she cannot, of herself, move a single step, in order to return into the favour of God. Therefore it is requisite that God prevent her, and through his gi-eat mercy be reconciled with his enemy, the sinner. Now this is what is done by pre- venting graces, the first of which is, by remorse of conscience ; the first expedient of the divine benignity to dispose and prepare the heart for repentance, and by which the Holy Ghost finds means of anticipating his own entrance into our souls. It may not be improper to confii-m this doctrine by an illustrious example. David falls, becomes an adulterer, and forthwith a murderer. God might have reprobated him as well as Saul, but he did not. So far from it, he makes him a most singular object of liis mercy. But how doth he begin ? You know it was by inspiring him with a remorse of conscience, by which that prince was deeply affected. At the voice of the prophet, David cries out, " I have sinned ;" I am guilty of a two-fold injustice ; I have yielded to the flesh, and spilt innocent blood. This was, properly, that upbraiding of conscience which is its own accuser, and was the first impulse by which that criminal king was induced to a thorough repentance. We read not in Scripture, that he gave, till then, any signs of repentance. Hitherto he had not poured forth tears, had not girded his loins with rough hair-cloth, had not mortified liis body with rigorous fasts. The reason of it is, that in the order of grace, remorse of sin must have been a forerunner to all this ; and there- fore it was, that I said remorse, in respect to the sinner, was the first grace in the way of salvation, the first call of God who invites us to return to him, the first fiiint glimmer of light which we behold in the shades of death in which sin hath buried us. And did not God likewise lay the same thing before the eyes of Cain, when, after reproaching him with the un worthiness of his sacrifices, and desu'ous to preserve that unfortunate wretch from the despair into which he was ready to sink, he said unto him : " Why is thy countenance fallen ? If thou doest ill, will not thy sin be pre- 80 ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. sently at thy door," (Gen iv.,) to disturb thee with remorse? It is this remorse that oppresses thy spirits ; and yet this it is that ought to animate thee, and fill thee with confidence, being a sen- timent of grace with which I inspire thee, and which shows I have not as yet abandoned thee. This is the interpretation which St. Ambrose puts on the words I have quoted ; an interpretation coin- cident with the terms of the scripture. For, certain it is, that God, at that time, spoke to Cain with a view to give him conso- lation. But have you remarked the few words that comprise ray proposition? " Presently thy sin shall be at thy door." Your sin, or, as the fathers of the Church explain it, the remorse of your sin, shall instantly be felt at the entrance of your heart. Which plainly shows, that remorse takes the lead of all other graces, and that thereby it is, that our merciful God makes the first impression on a rebellious soul : " Presently thy sin shall be at thy door." Ah ! Christians, ought not this alone to make it infinitely dear to us ! How then ! this internal reproach which I feel of my crime, is the first inquiry which God makes after me, is the origin of all the graces which I have reason to hope for from him, is the com- mencement of my happiness, and therefore, in how great estimation shall I hold it. But to proceed. I advanced another proposition, to wit, that of all graces, remorse of conscience was the most miraculous in the manner of its pro- duction. But in what doth this miracle of grace consist ? In this, that sin, so opposite in itself and in its own nature, to the graces of God, should yet give rise to the graces we are speaking of For, it is worthy of observation, that remorse of sin is occasioned and propagated by sin itself Neither can it be denied, as I have already shown, that remorse is a grace. Therefore, it is certain, that this grace is extracted as out of its source and origin, from the nonentity of sin. Whereupon St. Chrysostom, adoring the providence of the Deity, cries out : how admirable, O God, is your mercy in its decrees ! how powerful in its operations ! how ino-enious in its dispensation for the conversion of men ! We do not perceive it. Nevertheless, O Lord, you work miracles of grace with a view to save us, at the very time that our offences should provoke you to work miracles of justice with a view to punish us. For, from the sin which we have just committed, you draw forth the grace which reproaches our heart with having com- mitted it. In order to robe us with the stole of innocence, you ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. 81 make use of that which rendered us culpable ; you make use of that which caused our death, in order to procure us the blessing of life. It will, perhaps, be urged, beloved Christians, that it is beneath the majesty of the supreme Being, having received so flagrant an injury fi'om man, to condescend so as to seek him, and prevent him with his holy grace, and be desirous of attracting him ; and that so to incline towards a rebellious creature would derogate from his greatness. But it is a wrong notion, and your mistake proceeds from your ignorance of the nature and quality of grace. For, in all this, God perfectly maintains his majesty and his dignity. He calls, indeed, sinful man back to his duty, but without diminution of his supreme authority. He takes the first step, but he takes it as the Sovereign Lord and Ruler of all things. For, you must not imagine that this remorse is one of those graces by which Almighty God calls the sinner to return ; of those graces by which he lovingly invites the sinner ; of those graces accompanied Avith sweetness and celestial unction. Know then what God doth by the grace of remorse. He rises up against us Avith an indig- nation equally severe and majestic, saying to our heart : " Thou hast betrayed thy God." He lays us under a necessity of con- fessing ourselves guilty, and by obliging the conscience to say, " I have sinned," therein authoritatively spreads the terror of his judgments. In short, if the manner in which he prevents us be really a grace, it hath all the appearance of a real chastisement. This, St. Chrysostom hath finely represented in the person of Achab. Consider, my brethren, (says this holy doctor,) the effects which the remorse of his injustice toward Naboth had on that prince. Achab was a king, nay, a most absolute king. He could not brook the least contradiction, and pretended that every thing must be regulated according to his vdll and pleasure. Yet so soon as he hearkens to the voice of his conscience, his conscience that upbraids him with the violence of his procedure against one of his subjects — he is melancholy, dejected, confounded, abashed, extended on the ground, not daring to lift up his eyes to heaven. Never did he appear so humbled and debased in the presence of God. What but the remorse of his sin could operate so great a change ? That remorse, therefore, was a grace of God. Yes, (says St. Chrysostom,) but a commanding grace, by which God treated Achab as a slave, and not as a king ; with the severity of a judge, and not the endearments of a loving father. And accord- 82 ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. ingly this grace completely answers the idea which we have of our God, as the greatest and most powerful of all masters. There is another very estimable advantage attending tliis re- morse. Of all God's graces, there is not one so constant, or so little liable to withdraw itself from us. For, Christians, there are graces which St. Augustin denominates tender graces, because easily lost, and because sometimes God deprives us of them for slight infide- lities. But remorse of sin is a steadfast, settled, permanent grace ; a grace Avhich hardly ever quits us ; which follows us into every corner of the world ; with which God favours us in our own despite, and which it is beyond the power of man to rid himself of. For into whatever part of the world Ave should go, we should there find ourselves ; and, finding ourselves, we slioutd find our sin. As if Almighty God should say to the sinner : it is to no purpose that thou endeavourest to escape me ; my mercy is determined to cleave to thee and pursue thee wherever thou goest ; 1 have a grace that is proof against all contradiction, and it is remorse of conscience. Do what thou wilt, it will go in quest of thee, in the most infa- mous scenes of debauchery, in the hurry and confusion of the most noisy revels, in the most secret solitude and silent retirement. It is then it will act with the greatest force, and wi]l be most busy in delineating before thy mind's eye the two-fold image of thy crime and thy duty. Such in reality is the nature of this grace, that the more unworthy one renders one's self of it, the more it adheres to one. It comes forth with sin, it grows up with sin, and will cling to the conscience, until the conscience shall relinquish sin. And is not this a very singular privilege ? A grace ahvays ready to aid us on every the most desperate occasion ; and much more steady in opposing our viciousness, than our viciousness is headstrong in comljating against it. This is not all. As the grace of remorse is the most constant in its duration, it is in its extent the most universal. For we cannot say of it what the psalmist said of the particular graces which God conferred on the people of Israel, that they were not for barbarous and pagan nations, and that God reserved them for a small portion of the earth, Judea : " He hath not dealt so with any nation." Ps. cxlvii. This grace is indiscriminately common to all mankind. It is not only the righteous, like holy David, that, after having yielded, through human frailty, to the blandislimcnt of sin, feel remorse of conscience, but traitors like Judas, fratri- ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. 83 cides like Cain, tlie reprobated like Esau, all without exception, since there is, as St. Paul emphatically expresses it, " tribulation and anguish upon every soul of man that doeth evil." Rom. ii. Nay, (adds St. Augustin,) conscientious remorse, it should seem, is the appropriate grace of sinners ; for is it not to them that God communicates it the most frequently, the most abundantly, and the most efficaciously ? Ah ! Christians, how comfoiiable it is for a man habituated to criminal practices, to be able to say : how great a sinner soever I be, I have still room to hope ; God hath still graces in store for me, as weU as for saints. True it is, he hath gi-aces for his saints, to which we sinners have no pretension ; but he hath graces for his enemies, and these graces are remorses of conscience. What though this were all, beloved Christians, would it not sufficiently demonstrate that there is not a sinner in life entirely destitute of the benefit of grace ? And is it not, therefore, with reason that God lays a strict command even on the ungodly, to retm*n to him, as there is not one of them that hath not at least the help of his grace, this reproach of sin ? For (by the way) it is certain, that there is not a sinner on earth exempt from the obligation of making reparation to God, and to whom God doth not say : I insist that thou return by way of penance. This is undeniable. Therefore, there is not a sinner to whom this precept is impossible, and consequently who hath not some gi-ace of repentance, when he is under an obligation of repenting. Of this Ave have proofs beyond all doubt. But though we had not, what more convincing would you have than this ? Is it not sufficient to know that there is not a sinner unexjiosed to the stings of con- science ? Admirable, however, is another property of tlie grace of which I am setting forth the value : it is the most secure for the sinner, and the least liable to delusion. In other graces he runs the hazard of being deceived, as the angel of darkness oftentimes tmnsforms himself into an angel of light. Hence it is, that we take temp- tations for the graces of God and his holy inspirations : for instance, (says St. Ambrose,) a secret presumption for an impulse of hope, a natural tenderness of heart for a sentiment of divine love. But the remorse of sin is a certain grace, under the veil of which the enemy of men is unal)le to hide himself. For, nothing (continues this same holy father) is farther from his thoughts, than to show the 84 ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. sinner the irregularity of hia crime. So far from it, he uses his endeavours to conceal the shame of it, to diminish the heinousness, and efface from his mind the very remembrance of it. Therefore, Christians, when it happens that your conscience, after sinning, is disturbed with remorse, say with confidence : it is God that speaks to me, I know his voice — this reproach can proceed only from his holy grace ; nor is there anything to be feared by hearkening to it, as it will only inspire me with a hoiTor and regret of my vicious life. Now, effects like these are never produced by the father of lies. It is what you should say, beloved hearers, and such confi- dence will be a more powerful motive toward bringing you to God. For, besides the other advantages arising from remorse of con- science, one in particular is worthy of observation : that all the other gifts of our God, without this grace, are steril in regard, and that with it they are efficacious, because this grace makes them act for our conversion and our sanctification. And, indeed. Christians, to no purpose would God impress us, in the state of sin, with the fear of his justice, and kindle in our hearts the fire of his love : for if remorse hurts not the conscience, making it cry, " I have sinned," all the rest are useless ; and when once it is felt, it commimi- cates a particular and sanctifying virtue to all the rest. As if you should say — I have sinned ; therefore I should fear God who is my Judge : I have sinned ; therefore I will have recourse to the mercy of my God, to implore his favour : I have sinned, and by sinning am estranged from my God ; therefore I must return and be united with him by a holy love. Without remorse, I should never reason in this manner, nor even be converted. The reason of it is given by Zeno of Verona. The conversion of a sinner (says this holy bishop) is performed in the manner, however unusual, of a judicial trial. The culprit is acquitted, if he pleads guilty ; but by pleading not guilty, he is sentenced to die. As, therefore ; it is certain, that in courts of judicature, every procedure in criminal causes that is not grounded on the action of the prose- cutor and depositions of witnesses, is null and void ; so all other graces are of no force toward the sinner's justification, unless upheld by the remorse of his conscience, and the testimony he bears against himself. And now. Christians, I shall make it appear, that the grace of remorse is more convictive than all the rest in disposing the mind ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. 85 of man to repentance. For, what is more forcible to that effect, than to oblige the sinner to be his own accuser, saying, " I have sinned ?" — than to produce against him an irrefragable witness, which is his own conscience, saying, *' Thou hast sinned ?" — than to reduce him to the necessity of pronouncing sentence of con- demnation against himself, saying, " I am a sinner, and have deserved hell ?" Now all this is included in the xharge which conscience brings against a criminal soul. And this (says St. Gregory, pope) is what renders this remorse insupportable, and by consequence what renders this grace invincible. For whereas in judgments instituted by men, the -witnesses may be suborned, the prosecutors may be prejudiced, and it often happens that the tes- timony of one is not conformable to that of another ; so that in them the proof is hardly ever full. On the contrary, in a con- science disturbed with remorse, there can be neither supposition, nor passion, nor prepossession, because it acts in opposition to itself; and moreover as it performs the three offices of accusation, of judgment, and of condemnation, the sinner is absolutely neces- sitated to yield to it, because its testimony is an evident demon- stration, paramount to all the arguments in the world. Hence it follows, that this grace is also the most powerful over the heart of man, in making it pay submission to the orders of God. And in fact, what sinner is so excessively hardened as not to feel any stings of conscience ? And if he doth feel them, how can he bear them so as not to exert his utmost endeavours to extricate himself from so painful a situation, by relinquishing sin ? It is sometimes matter of astonishment to us, that the fathers of the Church, describing the nature of an irregular conscience, represent it in the character of a domestic executioner tliat torments the sinner. What would they insinuate by this figurative mode of expression ? That remorse of conscience, although it arises from the spirit of love, and is a real grace, nevertheless restrains — with the force, and as it were, barbarity of an executioner — rebellious souls, and subjects them to God. Ah ! Christians, this is the grace that hath at all times worked the greatest conversions in the Christian religion, and that constantly brings about such marvellous changes all over the world. Whenever you see, in town or coun- try, that a person reforms his moral conduct, and by the Ufe he leads, condemns the scandal of his past misdeeds, say : " It is owing to conscience ;" or, it was God that made use of conscience tocom- VOL. II. G 86 ON REMORSE OF CONSCIKMCE. pass it." Yes, conscience it is that rends rocks and moulders stones, in order to form them into the sons of Abraham. Conscience it is, (as St. Jerom expresses it,) that opens sepulchres, that is, souls, in order to attract, by salutary confessions, the venom hidden in them. In fine, conscience it was, that gave St. Agustin to the Church of God. That incomparable man renounced not sin, till compelled to do so by remorse of conscience. This was the grace, the victorious grace, that subdued his heart. The Almighty armed him against himself, and engaged him in a conflict in which he was worsted. Hitherto he had resisted every other grace ; but to that of remorse he Avas forced to yield, by that of remorse he was for- tunately vanquished. What treasures, O God, in a single grace ! And, therefore, how a sinner is indebted to your mercy for thus reclaiming him, and bringing him back to your holy service. Some there are, according to the prophet, whom passion sways, and who are immersed in vices ; who boastingly talk of internal tranquillity, though strangers to a truly peaceful mind : " Saying, peace, peace, and there was no peace." Jerem. vi. But herein, O Lord, I easily discover that they are abandoned to iniquity, and that you treat them according to all the severity of your divine judgments, because there is nothing more dangerous or dreadful than peace in sin ; neither can it be denied, that you never exert a more terrible vengeance, and that then it is the eternal reprobation of a soul commences. According to the same prophet, there are other sinners, the inhabitants of Jeinisalem, who repent, and embrace a penitential life, and protest it is remorse of their sins that disturbs the peace of their souls, and brings them to it, as it were, by compulsion. Lord, (say they,) you deceived us favourably, when, in your dis- grace, and in our criminal habits, " we look for peace, and behold trouble." Jer. viii. We sought out a proper remedy for the evils, "a time of healing, and behold disturbance. We acknowledge our wickedness, [because] we have sinned against thee our Lord." Jer. xiv. For by the agitation which you raised In our consciences, you made it experimentally appear to us that sin was our greatest enemy, and that you yourself were our supreme good and our whole felicity. It is, therefore, true, beloved hearers, that remorse of conscience hathu all the qualities of the completest grace. But, this being ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. 87 granted, where lies our crime, when, in a state of sin, we despise the unceasing voice of conscience. This is that which remains to be discussed in few words. The mercy of God, which bestows on man the grace which forms remorse of conscience, you have seen in the first part ; the malignity and misfortune of the man who resists this grace, to persevere in sin, you shall see in the second. May I crave your attention a moment longer. Part II. In order to discover at once the malignity and misfor- tune of the man who "svill not give ear to the voice of his conscience, the best method to be followed is, to resume the various qualities peculiar to the grace of which I have stated the advantages, and contrast them with the different degrees of resistance which may be remarked in the sinner's wilfulness. This presents to me a large field wherein to expatiate, but which I shall contract into naiTow limits. Hearken, I pray you, to my way of reasoning. In the state of sin, the reproach my conscience makes me of my evil state, is a grace. If, therefore, I neglect this reproach, I resist grace, and do all I can to stifle it in my heart. It is by no means a natural emotion, but an inspiration from above, which I suppress and render unprofitable to salvation. Of my this grace the Holy Ghost is the author, and he it is that reproves me for my sin. Whence it follows, that by resisting this grace, I resist the Holy Ghost, and that then I am one of those uncircumcised in heart, of whom St. Stephen spoke, when he said to the Jews : " Ye stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart, ye always resist the Holy Ghost." Acts vii. How did they resist him ? St. Chrya- ostom asks. By refusing to listen to the remorse of their con- science, which reproached them with not receiving Christ as their Messiah. You gave him up to death, and not satisfied with that, instead of acknowledging the hon-or of the Deicide, which, to bring you to repentance, represents its deformity to your imagina- tions in its whole extent, you persist in your crime. Wherefore I say that you are an unruly race, and that you harden your hearts against the Spirit of God : " Ye always resist the Holy Ghost." Now is not this exactly what the sinner doth in the warmth and impetuosity of the passion that possesses him ? His conscience tells him : that is forbidden ; it is injustice, it is revenge, it is a breach of faith. No matter, (replies he,) I AviE give scope to my desires, nothing shall withhold me. Is it possible to conceive a g2 88 ON REMOIISE OF CONSCIENCE. more formal resistance, or a more express and outrageous con- tempt of the law ? " Ye always resist the Holy Ghost." This evil, however, is carried to a stiU greater length, and the consequences of it are terrible indeed. For whereas remorse is the first grace to promote salvation, and the chief means of the sinner's conversion, what is the consequence of his not yielding to the force of its impression ? He renders ineffectual, so far as he is concerned, the inexhaustible fountains of divine mercy : and, if the expression be not too bold, in some sort puts it out of God's power to save him. And truly. Christians, how can you expect that, after this, God wiU stretch forth a helping hand, and draw you from the way of perdition in which you remain in spite of him ? Do you suppose that he will afford you other graces ? But that he cannot do, according to the ordinary rules of his providence. For, resolved it is in the eternal decrees of his providence, that remorse shall precede, or shall be the commencement of every other grace. Do you flatter yourselves that God will proceed in a special manner on your account, and will change the order of your predestination ? No, he will not : and you have not the least pretension to it. That as this change is no way necessary, it is your duty to conform to his laws, and not to expect them to be changed a tittle on your account. Consequently, to neglect this grace of remorse is to lose the favourable opportunity of repenting, to ruin the foundation of yom- justification, and to tear up by the roots all the fruits of penance. When Holofernes determined to make himself master of BethuHa, which he besieged, it was not merely by force of arms that he could at last reduce it to extremity, but by turning the waters with wliich it was supplied into another channel. Now thus it is, that you act against yourselves, and thus it is, that the libertines of the age are mostly damned. Had they seriously attended to the admonitions of theu* conscience, and tm'ned to advantage the ordi- nary helps, and this first grace, God Almighty would thereby have found admittance. Nor would he have stopped there : he would have proceeded farther, would have gradually raised a secret dis- gust of vice in their hearts, and a love of virtue, and would have communicated himself to them a thousand ways. But so long as they suffer him to knock at the door without opening it to him, and to obstruct every passage by which he may come to them, by blocking up that of remorse of conscience, there is no access to him. ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. 89 And is it not natural that he should give them over, and abandon them to themselves ? This, I say, is what makes them lead, to the last gasp, a disorderly life, and what carries them on, almost without fail, to final impenitence. And, indeed, Christians, is it not a most inordinate way of pro- ceeding, to commit sin, and in the presence of God to accuse one's self of what is most abominable and hateful in sin, and to draw no advantage from the only good that sin can produce, which is remorse of conscience ? I have told you that remorse was a grace quite miraculous, for that it takes its rise from sin itself. But is it not true, that the more miraculous it is in its rise the more blameable we are for not yielding to it ? God works for you, beloved hearers, a miracle of mercy, by showing you in your sin the grace that should destroy it, and repair all the damage of which it was the cause. But you, by a contrary kind of miracle, I mean a miracle of vice and obstinacy, render this grace fruitless and effectually stop the course of its virtue ; as though you had presumed to enteV the lists of the omnipotence of God, and, by the malignity of your vitiated heart, to surpass the excess of his love and goodness. But what conclusion is to be drawn from this ? That nothing, as I have shown, being more becoming the majesty of God, or more conformable to his supreme greatness, than the grace I am speaking of, nothing can be more invasive of his rights, or more injurious to him, than the revolt of a vile creature who rejects it — that makes head against it, and uses all his endeavours to put it to flight. For, the more God acts in quality of God, the more culpable I am in not submitting to him, and paying him obedience. Now by these remorses, God behaves to me in quality of master, as he humbles me, disturbs me, frightens me, takes vengeance of me, and makes me see what I am, and all my un worthiness. But I, by resisting these remorses, act perfectly the part of a rebellious subject. Not only I refuse to lend a favourable ear to the remonstrances of my God, but am displeased that he reproves me, and I reject liis menaces. Indifferent whether I am a sinner or not, whe- ther I am an agreeable or disagreeable object in his divine sight, whether I deserve his chastisements or rewards, I banish from my mind all these reflections, and entertain none but such as may contribute to my ease and content. Such is the into- lerable audacity of the sinner ! He flies in the face of the author of his being, and most daringly affronts the supreme arbiter of his eternal lot. 90 ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. His malignity, however, ends not there, and this is what en- hances it : of all gi'aces remorse of sin is the most constant and the most durable ; therefore resistance to this remorse implies malignity the most inveterate and the most insurmountable. A certain broacher of heterodox tenets in these later ages vaunt- ingly declared, that, after innumerable hard assaults which he was forced to sustain, he at length had so far got the better of his conscience, and withstood it with such firmness, that he was entirely freed from the inward reproaches which used to worry him. He said so, I own : but it was rather a diabolical vanity than truth. A diabolical vanity did I call it ? Was it not something worse ? For, the very devils in hell are perpetually and unmercifully racked and torn by remorse of conscience. And since it is not a grace, what can it be but a most cruel torment ? Of this our Saviour himself informs us, when he tells us, that "their worm dieth not, and their fire is not quenched." Mark ix. Nevertheless, Luther, the most headstrong and untractable enemy of the Church, would make us believe, that he had shaken off the yoke, and soared into regions beyond the reach of so importunate a censor. Be that as it may, it is not the subject of the present inquiry. But thence you may judge by what efforts of wickedness, and by what fire- quent resistance he came at last to be fixed, or to think himself fixed in that hellish disposition. You ask me, if a sinner can really come to that pitch. I cannot justly say : but I verily believe he cannot. However, if he can, it is the summit of wickedness ; and if he doth, it is that abyss of sin, of which Solomon speaks in the Book of Proverbs ; neither can the sinner be reduced to a more irremediable and abandoned state, than when he holds in contempt whatever concerns God and con- science : " When the wicked man cometh into the depth of sin, he despiseth." Prov. x\'iii. Although I do not take upon me to decide whether this can or cannot be, whether this really is or is not the case ; yet I dare afiirm, that it cannot be the case, without declaring an eternal war against God ; without saying to God : you are determined to attack me on every side, and on every side I wiU resist ; you are determined to grant me no respite, and Avithout ceasing I mil defend myself; you will make a vigorous impression on me, and I, by making head, and by holding out against you, shall succeed in absolutely repelling you from my heart, of which you are endeavouring to gain possession. This, dear Christians, ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. 91 we say not expressly, and in so many words, for we should shudder in uttering it, and have a horror of ourselves ; but we say it prac- tically and by our deeds, and act upon these detestable principles. This undoubtedly is the state of a soul euthralled by sin, and evi- dently lost Avithout resource. What ought more fully to convince us of this, is that which I have laid down as the sixth characteristic of conscientious remorse : an universal gi-ace, and the most common in every condition and in every state. Whereupon I make the fblloAving reflection, wliich will, I think, be allowed to be a solid one : you willingly renoimce, dear Christian brother, the most common grace, the most exten- sive grace, the grace which is never refused the most wicked and ungodly men. You give up this last, this only hope. What then remains for you ? Are you not, as it were, in a state of damnation ? For, one of the greatest miseries of the damned, is not the being lacerated with remorse' of conscience, but the being incapacitated from turning it to advantage ; the finding no aid or assistance in it ; the having no more of it than the feeling and the pain. Now I agree with you, that as yet you have it in your power to make good use of the remorse that stings you, and that in this behalf your situation is different. But as to the reality and effect of the thing, what matters it, whether or not you have it in your power to make good use of it, if in reality you make no use of it ? What matters it, whether or not it depends upon you to draw advantage from it, if in reality you draw none from it. What matters it, whether or not it be a favourable influence of the divine goodness, if in reaUty you profit not by it ? The malignity of your heart, and your blind resistance are the more criminal, because this grace is of all much the most certain for a sinner, and the least exposed to the wiles and artifices of the lying spirit. St. John, in his first epistle, wrote to his disciples in these words : " Dearly beloved, if our heart reprove us not, let us have confidence." 1 John iii. But Avithout contradicting the apostle's admonition, 1 say now to you: when your conscience reproaches you, put all your trust and aflSance in God, because it is a proof beyond all doubt, that he still thinks of you, and looks on you with an eye of compassion and tenderness : " Dearly beloved, if om* hearts reprove us, let us have confidence." These two propositions, seemingly contradictory, are not contraries. For, the apostle discoursed on the affiance of the righteous, which sup- 92 ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. poses innocence ; and I am speaking of the grace of repentance, which is never less liable to be called in question, than when it commences in a Christian soul by remorse of siu. Therefore, sinner, it is for you, the only secure ground, the only ground on which you may stand with entire certainty. But why do you rob yourself of its wholesome effects ? Why do you not call to mind St. Bernard's saying : that as remorse, of all graces, is the most secure, so resistance thereto is the most immediate disposition to despair ? Dreadful despau' ! which that same conscience, the Importunities of which you had so often eluded, will increase tenfold at the judg- ment of God ; that conscience, on which you had so often imposed a deadly silence, when it told you your duty against your will, in spite of your inclinations and brutal passions, but yet with a view to bring you anew to life, and bestow on you an eternal life, and wholly divine ; that conscience, against which you had conceived the same hatred that Achab had conceived against the prophet Michaes, forasmuch as that nunister of the Lord, taking aU the freedom which became a man deputed by God, declared to that prince misfortunes which affrighted him, but which he might have avoided by such foreknowledge : "I hate him, (says he,) because he doth not prophecy unto me good, but evil ;" (3 Kings xii. ;) that conscience, of which the remorse, from this time will be the most irreproachable and the most convincing testimony against you ; that conscience, which will bring more perceptibly than ever this remorse to light, in the presence of all the hidden of Adam, and will form, to your shame, and to your undoing, the most afflicting conviction: "Their conscience bearing a witness, and their thoughts accusing, or excusing one another." Kom. ii. As if Almighty God should then say to the reprobate : " Be your o^vn judges ; they are your consciences that accuse you : I cannot show cause for your condemnation but from their depositions. A hundred times they obliged you, in your life-time, to own, that you were sinners and deserving of my severest vengeance. I meant by them to recall you from your evil ways. They drew from you, how- ever, but a fruitless acknowledgment. The same they draw from you now after death, not for your conversion, but eternal reproba- tion. By what means shall I bring you to salvation, now that ye have passed sentence against yourselves ? Thus God will silence them, thus will he show his own proceedings equitable. Upon ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. 93 this account, O Lord, (says the royal prophet,) you call upon con- sciences to bear witness against men ; upon this account you force them to acknowledge to themselves that they have grievously sinned, and that their sinful state admits of no excuse : "To thee only have I sinned, and have done evil before thee." Ps. xxx. It is, O my God, to the intent that your justice may be screened from the smallest colour of blame, and that, however rigorous it may seem against the sinner, nothing can be objected to your determinations : " That thou mayest be justified in thy Avords, and mayest overcome when thou art judged." Ps. xxx. The inference, my brethren, from all this is, that therefore we must faithiully correspond with grace, while it is in our power, and yield to it without any longer resistance : I mean, to the gi-ace of re- morse of conscience, wliich is, by a very extraordinary privilege, not only the most forcible to bend the will, but the most powerful to con- vince the understanding. What did our blessed Saviour say to St. Paul, when on the way to Damascus, he dazzled his eyes with a light from heaven, and thundered in his ears these dreaded words, which brought him to the ground : " Hard it is for thee to kick against the goad." Saul, Saul, (said this God-man,) whither dost thou go, and what dost thou mean by openly declaring thyself the persecu- tor of my church ? Too long hast thou withstood my grace which seeks thee, and too painfvd will it be henceforward to resist its attractives. To you, beloved hearers, I address the same words. It is not impossible that many years may be already elapsed since God in- vited you to retm-n into the holy Uberty of his children, and wanted to withdraw you from the slavery in which you were unfortunately engaged. A propensity to evil is interwoven with your nature ; but you have at command coercive means in the dictates of con- science. Your heart hath been captivated by a perishable object, and it is no easy matter to shake off your fetters. But how many strokes hath conscience given to that effect ? And would it not have gained the desired end if it had been seconded by your endea- vours ? The senses and the flesh have a prevalence over you ; but the anguish of remorse, which pierces your soul, lets you see sufli- ciently, that the beastly delectation of the senses and the flesh will never satisfy you, and that you will always find in them more bit- terness of heart than pleasure. Only be sincere, and you will ao-ree to this. Yes, you will agree, that since the fatal moment wlien 94 ON REMORSE OF CONSCIENCE. your passion seduced you, and you paid submission to its tyrannous sway, you have not enjoyed a day of comfort ; that if, sometimes, you have been inebriated with this false delight, you paid dearly for it by the regret which ensued, by the grief which you conceived, by the reproaches which you felt, by the fear of divine vengeance with which you were seized — by all the principles and maxims of your faith, which awoke within you. You will agree that this perpetual domestic conflict between passion and conscience ; that this uncertainty in which you live, timorous and doubtful whether to renounce your passion or your conscience ; that these vicissitudes, these eternal fluctuations of your heart, give themselves a thou- sand times the lie, and a thousand times contradict themselves — now leaning to this resolution, and noAV to that, determining nothing — at least persisting in nothing determinate ; shunning what it wishes for, and seeking what it hates — for this is the case of innumerable sinners. You will agree, I say, that this is a very afflicting situ- ation ; and that, after all, it would cost you incomparably less to follow the voice of conscience, which pressingly sohcits you, and to carry, at the expense of all the rest, the holy resolution with which it inspires you into execution ! " Hard it is for thee to kick against the goad." And yet, happy it were for you, if the pains you suffer were the only misfortune. But there is a much more melancholy circum- stance still behind. By custom, which daily takes deeper root, conscience, it is true, is not reduced to a total inactivity, but acts not with its primitive force and vigour ; so that remorse, at length, makes but slight impressions, and loses almost its whole virtue. For (I have said it, and I say it again) it is what falls out, and what God permits — a tremendous punishment, with which hereto- fore, he threatened his people by the prophet Ezechiel. You are ever (says the Lord) in opposition to me ; and upon the defensive against my grace. But know the punishment which I have in store for you. Temporal afflictions I will not pour on you, neither loss of property, nor bodily sickness : in this manner I chastise my elect and my friends ; but ye deserve not such salutary treat- ment. One chastisement, however, I have in the treasures of my vengeance, more suitable to your unworthiness, and the more mor- tal, because it will coincide with your desires : " My indignation will rest in you." Ezech. x. How will it rest ? Because it will not reproach you at all, or will not do it with the same assiduity, ON THB LOVB OF GOD. 95 nor with the same importunity. When it thundered against you, and filled your souls with fright and consternation, it was a for- giving anger ; but when it shall seem to subdue and grow calm, it will be anger to reprobation. Ah ! my Lord, we are sinners, and as such, deserve the utmost exertion of your justice. But if you must needs take vengeance of us, let it be not by that more dreadful silence than all your thunder ; nor by that more dangerous rest than any disturbance whatever. The chief favour I beg of you, my God, is, that in this life you would show us no favour that we would not make proper use of. Raise tumults in our consciences, nor suffer them to sink into a supineness from which they would never revive. The royal prophet earnestly beseeched you, that you would not reprove him in your fury, nor chastise him in your anger. That was meant for a very different world from this, and we prefer the same supplication. But reproofs the most sharp and the most grating we shall humbly accept as signal favours. Nature will murmur, will be sorely pained, mortified, grieved — but that blessed grief, which the holy apostle preferred to all the pleasm*es in the world, ^vill bring us to repentance, and to the joy of the Lord and everlasting happiness. SERMON XXL ON THE LOVE OF GOD. " This he spoke of the Spirit, which they zvho believe in him should receive." John vii. It was not particularly on the twelve apostles, beloved Chris- tians, but on the faithful in general, that this divine Spirit was to liave come down ; and as the same faith was to have united us all in the bosom of the same Church, so the same spirit was to have inspired us with courage, and to have replenished us with his graces. The Spirit of Truth (according to the testimony of our blessed Saviour) was sent to teach us all things — but of all he hath taught us, it will be sufficient to have learned one only, inas- 96 ON THE LOVE OF GOD. much as to that all the others refer ; one, which St. Paul meant to indicate to us by these admirable words : " The love of God is poured out into our hearts by the Holy Ghost." Rom. v. For this spirit of light is, in a special manner, a spirit of love ; and when we shall love God, we shall possess the whole science of salvation in the love of him ; and, even in this life, shall enter upon .that which shall be our occupation and happiness to all eternity. But is it not amazing, beloved Christians, that although to love God was the end of our creation, we should hitherto, perhaps, know not in what the love of God consists ; but that, although subject to the law, we should be ignorant of the first and great precept of the law. It is, therefore, of importance that I give you a clear and exact knowledge of it, which I purpose to do in this discourse. Of all our obligations, it is the most essential ; and what the vdse man said of the fear of God, I may with equal propriety say of the love of God: " This is all, man." Eccles. xii. O thou holy Spirit, thou Spirit of Love, come in aid of my zeal ; inspire my breast, put words of fire into my mouth — that lieavenly fire of which thou art thyself the inexhaustible source ; that sacred fire which constitutes the happiness of the blessed in heaven, and of the saints upon earth. To mitigate the precepts of the law of God, by putting on them constructions and glosses favourable to corrupt nature, is a maxim, Christians, most dangerous in its consequences ; but to overstrain these same precepts, and to understand them in a sense too rigid, and beyond the bounds of truth, is an excess to be avoided with equal caution. To say, this is not a sin, when it is so in reahty, is a dangerous error, that may terminate in consequences fatal to salvation ; but to say, this is a sin, when it is not so in fact, is ano- ther kind of error — an error, perhaps, still more prejudicial. Long before our days, have those strongly been opposed, who, by prin- ciples too large, would save all mankind ; but long before our days have those justly been condemned, who exposed all the world by the severity of their maxims, to fall into despair. Fourteen cen- turies and upwards are elapsed, since Tertullian reproached the Catholics of his time with relaxation of morals ; but fourteen cen- turies and upwards are elapsed, since Tertullian was reproached with extreme rigour — rigour without bounds; rigour which, at last, plunged him into heresy. We must steer a middle course ; and when the point in hand is concerning the reprobation or justi- ON THE LOVE OF GOD. 97 fication of a sinner, we must equally avoid partiality and severity, and be wise according to the rules of faith. Now this I say. Christians, because as I am to treat, in this dis- course, on one of the fundamental articles of religion, I would gladly rectify a wrong notion \nth. which you may probably be prepossessed — either, that I should exaggerate, or diminish your obhgations. Of these two extremes it imports me to beware ; and for that reason, I shall adduce nothing but what is universally received, is evident and incontestable, and is founded on the un- shaken basis of faith. I shall no more adhere to the opinion of one, than to the doctrine of another, but shall tread in the foot- steps of aU divines. I shall not, in preference to the less pro- bable, embrace the more probable. I shall not deem it enough to tell you what is true, but you shall believe what the gospel obliges you to believe. This being supposed, I enter upon my subject, which 1 shall lay before you in few words. I take it for granted, • that the love of God which is commanded, should have three cha- racteristics : one relative to God ; another relative to the law of God ; a third relative to Christianity, in which we are initiated by the call of God. First, then, with respect to God ; the love of God, is a love of preference, and it is the ground- work of it. Secondly, mth respect to the law of God ; the love of God is a love of plenitude, and it is the extent of it. Thirdly, with respect to Christianity ; the love of God, is a love of perfection, and it is the degi'ee of it. I shall endeavour to throw what light is requisite on these three heads ; and I earnestly request that you would favour me, in pro- secuting so noble a subject, Avith uncommon attention. Part I. It was not without reason, that Christ, explainino-, himself, the precept of the love of God, reduced the whole sub- stance of it to these few words : " Thou shalt love the Lord with thy whole heart, and with thy whole soul ;" (Luke x. ;) as (accord- ing to an excellent remai-k of St. Augustin) the one serves to deter- mine the obligation of the other, and as the worship of the mind should be strictly commensurate Avith that of the heart. To what in fact, am I bound by this holy and adorable law, " thou shalt love ?" Endeavour all you can to comprehend the whole force of it. I am bound (replies the evangelical doctor, St. Thomas) to have for God a love of distinction, a love of singularity — a love 98 ON THE LOVE OF GOD. which is suitable only to the Deity : that is, a love, in virtue of which I prefer him to all created things. And this is the tribute, the essential tribute, by which God requires that I render due homage to the sovereignty of his Being, "thou shalt love the Lord." He commands me not absolutely to love him with a love of tenderness and feeling ; such feeling and tenderness is not alwaya in my power, much less with a constrained or forced love — it were not honourable for him to be loved in that manner — nor even with a love of fervour to any certain degree : this degree of fervour is beyond my discernment, and God, in condescension to my weak- ness, is pleased to lay me under no such injunction. But he requires, under pain of everlasting reprobation, that I love him as God, in preference to all that is not God. Observe, Christians, this term — preference. I mean not a vague and speculative preference, which would only draw me from an acknowledgment that God was superior to all created beings ; for in order to that, the supernatural charity of which I speak, would be in no wise requisite, as the devils themselves, who hate Almighty God, have for him, notwithstanding the inveteracy of their hatred, this sentiment of esteem. I mean an active and practical prefer- ence ; a preference, by which I am sincerely disposed to lose the ivhole world, rather than consent to lose the grace of God for a single moment. A disposition so requisite, that of all the things which I can desire or possess, were there but one which I pos- sessed or desired at the hazard of incurring God's displeasure : that is, if this act of love, which I form in my heart, at the time I pro- test to God that I love him, hath not in it virtue sufficiently im- pulsive to make me break all ties, and forego all connexions which may separate me from him, I must pronounce sentence of condem- nation against myself, for having prevaricated with respect to the love of God ; I must conclude, that I am far from fulfilling the commandment of the love of God ; that, therefore, I am no longer in a state of grace and favour with God ; and, consequently, that I walk not in the way which leads to salvation and to God. The reason is this : in loving him, I fail in the most essential condition, which is, of loving liim in preference to all things. And herein, (says St. Chrysostom,) not only God requires not too much, but, if rightly considered, it is not in his power to require less. For, observe, my brethren, (says this holy doctor,) that God commands us to serve liim, to honour him, to love him propor- ON THE LOVE OF GOD. 9^ tionably to what he is, and in a manner that shall distinguish him from what he is not. Is anything more reasonable ? A king ex- pects to be served as a king, and why should not God be loved as God ? Now this cannot be, unless he be loved preferably to all created things ; for he is God by this — that he is above all crea- tures. And if (to form a chimerical supposition) a creatm*e had wherewithal to conciliate love as much as God, he would cease to be a creature, and would become God. As, therefore, it is true, that if I loved a creature with that love of preference, which, pro- perly speaking, is the sovereign love, I no longer should love him as a creature, but as God ; so also it is evident, that if I love God with any other love than this love of preference, this sovereign love, I love him not as God. Now not to love God as God, is to commit a grievous outrage against him ; and so far is it from observing his law, that it is perpetrating a crime, which, in the opinion of divines, and in the intention of the perpetrator, hath a direct tendency to the destruction of the Divinity. This, beloved hearers, God himself hath revealed in a thousand places in the inspired writings, and herein terminates the capital duty of mankind : " Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with thy whole heart." But in order to develop this material point, and to comprehend it with more exactness and precision, let us consult St. Paid, and give ear to St. Augustin ; and let us see, by what this apostle of the Gentiles, and this doctor of the Church, have delivered concerning it, whether we may, this day, bear testimony in our ovsm behalf, and safely conclude that we love God. There needed a soul well grounded in the faith, to give the defiance in terms so general, and so full of confidence, to all crea- tures, as did St. Paul, when he said; " Who shall separate us from the love of Christ." Rom. viii. Shall affliction, shall danger, shall persecution, shall famine, shall nakedness, shall the sword, shall violence ? Shall injustice and the most barbarous cruelty ? No, no : (replies this vessel of election) for certain I am that nei- ther death, nor life, nor greatness, nor abasement, nor poverty, nor riches, nor prmcipallties, nor powers, nor all creatures, shall ever be able to separate us from the love which unites us with our God. Thus spoke this apostolical man. What think ye of it. Christians ? Doth he not seem transported with an excess of zeal ? And did he not, with a view to give it greater lustre, include in these words the whole perfection of dl^^ne love ? It is a great 100 ON THE LOVE OF GOD. mistake — he expressed no more than the common obligation of loving God. In giving this defiance, and in making answer to it, he spoke not as an apostle, but as one of the faithfid : he, indeed, expressed himself by a copious enumeration ; but nothing did he say, to which all mankind are not bound in rigour. So that who- ever is unable to say as much, *' hath no inheritance in the kingdom of God." Ephes. v. Mind my meaning : for it is just as if each of ua should say to himself — and I would that after the apostle's example we were often to say it — well, of all the things which I behold in the universe, and which might be the objects of my ambition or con- cupiscence, is there one sufficient to make me stagger or recoU, in case I were required to give a convincing proof of the love and fidelity I owe to God? " Who shall separate us from the love of Christ ?" Let us come to particulars as well as St. Paul. If I crouched under the bloody lash of persecution, and had it in my power to be delivered therefrom by revenge, permitted according to the world, but condemned by God and the maxims of his gospel, should I purchase my deliverance upon those terms ? If I were, by a cruel reverse of fortune, reduced to indigence, wretchedness, and extremity, and had it in my option to wallow in comforts, ease, and affluence, by transgressing the bounds of justice and conscience, should I dare to venture it ? If to gain, or to keep, the favour of the greatest prince in the world, I needed only to have for him a criminal complaisance, should I do so, in eflfect to the prejudice of my duty ? If by once transgressing the Christian law, it were no hard matter to arrive at honours, to which I could pretend by no other means, would the desire of rising in the world preponderate ? If the way of iniquity, on some desperate occasion, were the only means of saving my Ufe, should I dare not to face the king of terrors ? Ah ! my brethren, know, that if the love which you imagine you bear your Almighty Maker, be not of a nature intrin- sically superior to all this, how ardent and affectionate soever it it may seem, it is the love which God insists upon. And let it be remembered, that it is a great mistake, if placing your confidence in such a love, you conclude it will clear you in the presence of God. You love not God, I do not say with the superabundance of charity which inflamed the breasts of the most righteous men, but in the degree and measure prescribed by the law. The reason is, that this supposed love gives not to God the place which he ON THE LOVE OF GOD. 101 ought to take up in your hearts : that is, it doth not place him above a thousand things, which yet should be placed in a much inferior degree of affection. For, granting even the reality of the love which you think you entertain for God, you set still more by your life, by your fortune, by your good name, by your peace of mind, than by the inheritance of God, or, to speak more properly, than by God himself. Whence it follows, that this love is not the love of preference which God requires, and which the law com- mands : " Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with thy whole heart and with thy whole mind." Thus it was that the great St. Paul conceived this matter ; and how great soever may be the refinement of human reason, it will ever be unable to oppose the evidence of this principle. But after the apostle, let us hear St. Augustin. This holy doctor, in liis accurate Commentaries on the Thirtieth Psalm, makes this proposal to the faithful of his time : " Let your hearts speak, my brethren." At present I shall only interrogate your hearts, not daring to rely on the testimony of your mouths, and being well assured, that in matters regarding the love of God, it is only the heart that hath a right to speak : let your hearts, therefore, speak. If God, at this moment, should make you an offer, to all appear- ance the most advantageous, and the most capable of filling up the extent of your desires ; if he should promise to leave you for ever upon earth, in exuberance of liches, in satiety of honours, and in a capacity to relish all the pleasures of the world ; if he ihould say : I bestow on you all this ; you shall be rich, powerful, live comfor- tably, so that nothing shall be able to disturb or afflict you ; and, what you make infinitely greater account of, you shall be exempt from death, nor shall there ever be an end to this human felicity. But then you shall never behold my face, never shall you enter into the kingdom of glory which I have prepared for my elect. I ask you, (says St. Augustin,) if God should speak to you in this manner, would you cheerfully enter upon such a destiny ? "Would you gladly accept of such an offer ? Should it square with your wishes, beloved Christians, it would be an infalUble and undeniable token that you had not as yet begun to love God. It is the very conclusion Avhich this father hath draAvn ; and whence hath he drawn it ? From this invariable and fundamental principle, that the love of God should be a love of preference ; and this it were VOL. II. H 102 ON THE LOVE OF GOD. utterly iirtjwBsible to have, if you consented to be deprived of the fruition of God, in order to enjoy the good things of this life. But to make a supposition still more natviral, and more to the point of the present subject. Figure to yourself the thing in this world to "which you cleave with the greatest earnestness, and that is your honour. It is deeply wounded by an atrocious calumny, or an outrageous affront. You have lost all credit and esteem in the world ; and such is the nature of your situation in life, that the stain which dishonours you is more insupportable than death itself. Nevertheless, there remains but one way to efface it, and that is a criminal one. It is, however, proposed to you : and if you do not accept it, you fall irretrievably into utter contempt. Hereupon I ask you, beloved hearer : do you love God sufficiently to believe that you would make, on such an occasion, a sacrifice of your resentment to him ? Answer me not, that God Avould then afford you particular succour. The question relates not to the succour which God would then afford you. The point is, to knoAV with what fidelity you use the succour which he now affords you. I ask not what act of love you would form in those circumstances, but what kind of act you now produce ; and I desire to know, if it be such in its nature as would calm the tumult which the received injury would raise in your breast ? For if that be the case, your hopes are well-founded, and you want no just reason to be satisfied with yourself. But if it be otherwise, the dread and horror of never-ending anguish should overwhelm your heart, because it is destitute of the vivifying charity which operates sal- vation, and of which the law lays you under a strict obHgation, of loving your God preferably to your honour. But is it not hard for a man of the world to have this disposition ? Hard or not hard, (replies St. Bernard,) it is the only scale in which you will be weighed ; it is the only rule by which God mtII judge you. The love of preference will condemn innumerable worldly souls, whose attachment to frail and despicable creatures, induced them to love, adore, and serve them, so as to forget the essential obli- gation of loving the Creator. No mention shall be made even of some certain shameful passions. The love of preference will con- demn innumerable fathers and mothers, whose weakness and ill- judged fondness for their children, will draw upon them the reproach Avhich Almighty God made to the high priest, Heli : " Since you have made greater account of your children than of me," ON THE LOVE OF GOD. 103 (1 Kings, 11.,) I win doom you to perdition. The love of prefer- ence will condemn Innumerable Christian women, who, for havinof carried the duty of their state beyond the due bounds, preferred that to God, which they should only love for the sake of God. Tlie love of preference will condemn over-zealous friends, who, regarding friendship as their bounden duty, and, totally addicted to the will of their associates, entered into all their Intrigues and undertakings ; and, disregarding, or overlooking the pre-eminence of God, became ardent abettors of their Injustices and violences. The love of preference, the first duty of man, and It relates to God. The love of plenitude, the second duty of man, and it respects the law of God, and is the subject of the second part. Part II. To Include in his essence the whole auerreafate of beings, is the property of God ; and of the love of God, the pro- perty is, to reduce to the unity of a single precept all the other precepts, which, however different and infinite in number, are comprised, notwithstanding, in the love of God. " Love," (says St. Augustin,) " and do what thou wilt." It would seem by this, as if the love of God abolished all the other duties of man. But this is wide of that father's meaning, whereas he would give us thereby to understand, that all the other duties of man, being united as they are in the love of God, he may have full liberty to do as he will, provided he love God, because loving God, he is necessitated to do all the other duties incumbent on him, and is incapacitated from desiring what clashes Avith his duty. This, beloved hearers, is the whole scope of these elevated words deli- vered by St. Paul : " Therefore love Is the fulfilling of the law." Rom. xlii. A point of doctrine which it so much behoves you to understand perfectly. For, in order to produce this act of love which is the subject of the supreme commandment, " Thou shalt love the Lord," we must be prepared, or, to speak more properly, determined, by an absolute, sincere, efficacious will, to observe, without reservation, and without exception, all the other com- mandments ; and we must be persuaded, that to love God Avithout this disposition is as impossible as it is to love and not to love at the same time. I say all the commandments without exception : for here. Christians, you should advert to a veiy material circum- stance, which, perhaps, you have never comprehend thoroughly. There is a wide distance betAveen charity and moral or natural virtues : for I cannot, on fulfilling one precept, say, I have incen- h2 104 ON THE LOVE OF GOD. tive charity ; if I fulfil more, I shall have an increase of charity ; and when I have fulfilled them all, my charity will be complete. No, the case is qnite otherAvise. Charity is essentially one and indivisible, taking in and observing every article throughout the whole compass of the law of God. If I called in question (says St. Thomas) a single article of the religion I possess, whatever submission I might have with regard to all the rest, it would be true, notwithstanding, that I had not the least degree of faith, because faith is substantially one and indivisible. In like manner, it is beyond all doubt, that although I had for all the other com- mandments the submission of will which the law requires, if it fail with regard but of one in particular, it follows that I have not the least degree of the love of God. There is (continues the angelical doctor) a great love ; and in a comparative view with this, we may say, that there is a less love ; but the love which is less, if true, is extended, as well as the great, to all present, future, and possible oblifmtions whatever. And when St. Paul loved God with that extatic love, which he hath painted in colours so striking and lively, he laid himself under no greater obhgation than the least of the righteous who loves God the most feebly, if he love him truly. Upon this account it is, that the apostle denominates this divine love, " the fulfilling of the law ;" (E,om. xiii. ;) because all the commandments of the love of God coalesce in charity, of whicli it is composed, as of so many parts, because they concentrate in it, like so many lines, which, although distinguished in their various directions yet terminate and unite in the central point. And truly among all the particular precepts, considered other- ■wise than in this centre of divine love, there is no connexion or natural dei>endance of one upon another. We may observe one, without fulfilling another. That which forbids me to wrong my neighbour, is silent with regard to perjury or adultery. That which commands me to relieve the poor, makes no mention of prayer or penitence. But all this is inseparably connected with the love of God. The reason is, that this love, in virtue of its contents, and what we call its plenitude, is a general prohibition of whatever is repugnant to good order, and a universal injunction of whatever is conformable to right reason. And, accordingly, to speak in the language of divines, if I inwardly protest to God that I love him, I promise to obey his will in all things as much as if I specified each in particular ; and, disclosing my heart, I set forth my senti- ON THE LOVK OF GOD. 105 mentsby this single act, relatively to all that God knows 1 owe him, or am desirous to do for him. Whereupon St. Augustin makes a judicious reflection, which is to this effect. He examines these words of our blessed Saviour: '* If ye keep ray command- ments, ye shall abide in my love ;" (John xv. ;) he draAVS a comparison between these words and this other passage in the same gospel : " If ye love me, keep my commandments ;" (John xix. ;) and thus he reasons upon it : Jesus Christ, on one hand, assures us that if we love him, we shall obey his law ; and on the other, that if we obey his law, Ave shall love him. How then ! Is charity fulfilled by the law ? Or is it by the fulfilling of the laAV that charity is practised ? Do we love God, because we pei-form that wliich he commands? Or do Ave perform that Avhich he commands, because we love him ? Ah ! my brethren, (repHes this holy and incomparable doctor,) let us not at aU doubt, that the one and the other are fulfilled according to the oracle and meaning of the Son of God. For, whoever sin- cerely loves God, hath already fulfilled the whole circle of precepts in the disposition of his heart ; and whenever he carries liis resolu- tion of fulfilling them into execution, he only ratifies, and confirms by his Avorks, that Avhich he hath already done in affection, and in the recesses of his soul. Whence we may infer, that to produce an act of the love of God, without an absolute Avill to observe his commandments, is an evident contradiction ; for, " love is the ful- filling of the laAv." Rom. xii. Suppose then a certain kind of person, of which the depravity of these our times affords numerous instances : I mean a person of limited fidelity, a person who pays submission to the laAV, but not completely ; a person, if you please, who complies with every article of the laAV, save one : he is neither blasphemer, nor free- thinker ; neither cheat, nor unjust possessor ; neither passionate, nor revengeful ; he is regular in his devotions, and upright hi his deaUngs ; but his Aveakness appears from his yielding to a passion which overbeai-s his reason, and Avhich, though the only one that holds him in bondage, is not the less for that the scandal ol' his life. Or let us consider him in another light : he is chaste and abstemious, regular in his amusements, an enemy to misrule, and a zealous advocate for good order and purity of manners ; but, for all his zeal and purity of manners, he cannot bring himself to for- give an injury ; for all his regidai-ity, he Avill not govern his licen- tious tongue, but lashes his absent neighbour Avith impunit}'. I 106 ON THE LOVE OF GOD. say that this person hath no more charity, I mean that divine and supernatural charity, that charity on which salvation depends, than a heathen or a pubhcan ; and that God, whose discernment, though severe, is just and infalUble, dooms hmi equally to destruction and eternal reprobation, as if he had transgressed every article of the law. The reason is tliis : by omitting one point, he is deficient in that wliich is essential to charity ; namely, an efficacious and deter- mined will to fulfil every article within the compass of the law. And in this sense is to be understood that saying of St. James, which in former ages appeared so obscure to the fathers of the Church, and concerning Avhich, St. Augustin himself thought it advisable to take the opinion of St. Jerom : " Whosoever shall offend in one point, is guilty of the w^hole." James ii. What ! (says this father) shall then the transgression of one precept be deemed equally criminal with the transgression of them all ? Is it no more wicked to violate them all, than to violate one ? Is God indifferent as to this or to that ? Is he no more offended by the one than by the other ? In that sense, indeed, (replies St. Jerom,) the proposition would be erroneous, and pernicious in its conse- quences. But in the sense of the apostle, it contains an incontest- able tenet of our faith ; that whoever acts in a single point, against the law of God, is as much deprived of his saving grace, loses cha- rity as infallibly, hath no more pretension to the inheritance of glory, in a word, is as liable to be eternally damned, as if he had violated it in all parts. And St. Bernard, ruminating on this doctrine, cries, O my God, I have no reason to complain, as though the obligation which I am under of loving you were too rigorous. For, can anything, on the contrary, be more consentaneous with the rules of equity than this law ? And should I not, by condemning it, condemn myself, whereas I pretend, though but a mortal man, to a right of requir- ing that my friends behave to me with the same faithfulness ? Should one of them only make me an ungenerous return in an important affair ; should he side with my adversary ; should he blast my character ; should he affront me by insolent or contumehous language, how in-eproachable soever as to everything else he may be in my regard, I strike him out for ever from the hst of my friends, and conclude that he is wanting to me even in that com- mon charity which all mankind OAve one to another. But he hath only offended me in one point. No matter : it is abundantly suffi- ON Tllli LOVE OF GOD. 107 cient to make me clearly perceive, that I cannot suppose I have a share in his affection ; because if he loved me sincerely and solidly, he Avould ever be careful to give me no mortification, or hiu-t mc in my mind. Thus it is, my God, that I conceive this matter : and if such be my judgment of it in my own case, how shall I judge otherwise, Avhen the question relates to the interests of my Creator and supreme Lord ? When I take a step in contravention to your orders, and to the prejudice of your honour, how inoffensive and irreprehensible soever I may be in all other respects, it is not to be wondered at that you should blot me out of the Book of Life, for having prevaricated against the law by which you require that I should love you above all created things. But to conclude from thence, beloved Christians, that being once sinners, we have no farther measures to keep with our Maker ; and that as charity is indivisible, it were as well we should lose it for much as for little, be libertines outright as only by halves ; follow the suggestions of all our passions as gratify but one ; run the greatest lengths as use restraint, would be an impious and merce- nary way of reasoning : impious, inasmuch as by this maxim of all or naught, we should expect to gain credit by our extravagance and libertinism : mercenary, for that we should have but our own satisfaction in view, indifferent as to the degree or measure in which God might be offended. But this, my brethren, (says St. Augus- tin to his flock,) is a mistaken notion ; for although the love of God and charity be convertible, and unsusceptible of division, it is an undoubted truth, that the more you transgress the command- ments of God, the more detestable you make yourself in his divine presence — your return to grace becomes the more difficult ; you increase the more that treasure of wrath, of which St. Paul speaks, and you should expect to undergo the greater chastisement in a wofid eternity. These considerations, if you have any principles of religion left, will be more than sufficient to check the impe- tuosity of your evil courses." However, Christians, it cannot be denied, that there is a great deception in the conduct of men with regard to this great precept : " Thou shalt love the Lord thy God." Luke x. Notliing is more easy than to say, I love God ; and yet nothing is less common in practice than this love. We impose upon ourselves by not distin- guishing between real and counterfeit love of God. Not oidy our hy|)ocrisy leads others into error, but we deceive ourselves by volun- 108 ON THE LOVE OF GOD. tary blindness. If our soul be but actuated by the slightest senti- ment of love for God, instantly we fancy that all is right, and con- clude that we have a plenitude of divine love. Natural aifection we often mistake for an impulse of grace ; and an impulse of grace for the effect of our fidelity. We confound the inspiration which compels us to love, with love itself; and that which Almighty God operates within us, independently of us, we attribute to ourselves, vainly imagining that thereby we have complied with all the obU- gations Avliich were imposed on us by the supreme Ruler. But, beloved Christians, it is a great mistake : and wo be to us, if either we fall into, or remain in such gross errors. To love God, is„to refrain from everything which the law forbids, and to put whatever it commands in practice ; it is to war with our passions, and per- petually to deny our perverse appetites ; it is to humble our minds, to crucify our flesh, and to crucify it according to St. Paul's moni- tion, with its vices and lusts ; it is to resist the delusions and charms of the world, the torrent of custom, and the poisonous influ- ence of bad example ; in a word, it is to have a strong desire, and efficacious will to please God in all things, and displease him in nothing. In loving him thus with a love of preference and a love of plenitude, it remains that we love him with a love of perfection, in respect to Christianity, as I am going to set forth in the third part. Part III. Although Almighty God be at all times the same, and his unchangeable perfections make him unchangeably amiable, it is true, notwithstanding, (as St. Bernard observes,) that accord- ing to the various states in Avhich man may be considered, the love he owes God hath manifold degrees ; and that in proportion to the gifts and favours he hath received from heaven, the measures of height, of depth, and of breadth, Avhich the apostle of the Gen- tiles ascribes to charity, must be more or less extended. Now from tliis principle, which is founded in reason, I make two deductions: first, that the precept of divine love imposes on man much greater obligations in the new law, than it did in the old : secondly, that therefore, the act of divine love ought to be in us, Christians, much more heroical, than it needed to have been in a Jew or a Gentile, before the law of grace. And now, without further preface, I shall enter upon the proof both of the one and of the other. 1st. From the first moment that I become a Christian, it is incumbent on me to love Almighty God in a Christian manner. ON THE LOVE OF GOD. 109 Now it is much more to love him in a Christian manner, than in a manner merely human. The reason is this : in lo\dng him, we bind ourselves (besides the eternal and divine law, which is com- mon to us all) to a particular law, of which Christ is the author. Consequently, it is to add an engagement of charity which it ori- ginally Avas void of, and which is, in course of time, become the sum- mit of perfection : "I testify (says St. Paul) to every one who is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law." Gal. v. And I declare to you, Christians, conformably to the words of that great apostle, that so soon as you were engaged to Jesus Christ by bap- tism, you took upon yourselves a yoke abundantly more holy than that which is prescribed by the law of Moses ; a yoke, which you must cany all the days of your life ; a yoke, to which your sal- vation is indispensably annexed ; a yoke, without which, God nei- ther will nor can be the object of your love. Ah I beloved hearers, what a ti-ain of reflections doth this lead us into ! Steadfastly to believe that the law of Christ Jesus is a law of sweetness, a law of grace, a law of liberty, a law of love — is steadfastly to believe what the divine Spirit hath himself revealed, and what the sacred pen- men have inculcated in every page of their writings. But to ima- gine it sweet, because the duties it prescribes are not rigorous, nor contrary to the senses and to corrupt nature ; to imagine that its liberty consists in irregularity and looseness of manners, and that it is not a law of abnegation and suffering, would be, I do not say a mistaken notion, but the way to destroy it. No, no ; (says Ter- tullian, setting forth his sentiments upon this head) the liberty which Christ brought doAvn to us from heaven, countenances in no sort, hcentiousness of manners. If that God-man put a final period to the sacrifices and ceremonies of the written laAv, he hath given us in return rules of Ufe more capable of sanctifying our souls ; and that which was condemned in the Old Testament by the precept of charity, bears a double criminality, since the God of charity came, himself, to deliver his own doctrine and give us example. This, beloved Christians, is fixed undeniably on the basis of truth. For how often hath our adorable Saviour declared it in the gospel? How often hath he clearly made us understand, that to embrace liis religion, we must renounce the world, and ourselves too, in a much superior and perfect manner than was required by the Jewish legislator ? How many much more strict and severe interpretations hath he given to the principal articles of the law of 110 ON THE LOVE OF GOD. God? How many dispensations, though not repugnant to the law, hath he abolished ? He hath rescued us, it is true, from legal observances ; but to many others he hath tied us down ? Of that one commandment — that we love our enemies, is not the perfection more eminent and sublime, than of all that was taught and prac- tised by the Pharisees ? To how great a degree hath he raised (as I may say) some certain obligations of the law of nature ? In how many particular points hath he exerted his supreme power, in order to lay us under new prohibitions ? It hath been told your fathers, (so he spoke to the Jews,) that such and such things were not forbidden ; but I declare unto you, that those things, supposed then to be allowable, shall no longer be allowed for those who come after them. Some interpreters, I know, have asserted that the Son of God spoke after that manner, not with a view to improve upon the law, or to add to it in the least, but only to amend the erroneous glosses and explanations of the Scribes and teachers in the synagogue ; but I also know, that this opinion hath been canvassed and impugned by most of the fathers. For if our blessed Saviour (as St. Jerom observes) meant only to refute the doctrine of the Pharisees, and not make new precepts, upon what ground could he command them to do good to those from whom they had received evil, to pray for their persecutors, to love their calumniators ? Where Avas this to be found ? In what book ol' the law was such commandment inserted? Is not the contrary clear and evident, as a right of requiting hatred with hatred, and inimical retaliation are authori- tatively set down ? It is, therefore, undeniable, that Christ in- tended to outgo Moses, when he told his disciples : " But I say unto you, (that his design was to enact laws of his ovni,) this is my commandment ;" (John xv. ;) that what we call the Decalogue is, relatively to us, more perfect than it was with respect to the Jews ; and, by a necessary consequence, that to love Almighty God in the Christian rehgion, greater pains must be taken than was needful before the preaching of the gospel. This, beloved hearers, is what Tcrtulhan, in his usual style, called "the weight of baptism;" and this is what betrayed him into a way of tliinking, which however dissonant from the spmt of the Church, affords matter notwithstanding for an excellent reflec- tion; let it not escape you. He spoke of catechumens Avho, touched with God's grace, and impatient to be incorporated m the ON THE LOVE OF GOD. 1 1 1 church of Jesus Christ, earnestly entreated to be cleansed from their sins in the laver of salvation ; wliich, however, it was thought proper sometimes to postpone, in the view of procuring more cer- tain and convincing proofs of their faith. This delay gave them great uneasiness ; and Tertullian, on the other side, surprised at the desire they so warmly expressed, expostulated with them, and told them that if they kncAV what baptism was, they would rather be in dread of it than wish to receive it. I have told you. Christians, that this doctrine tallied not entirely with the spirit of the Church, as it favoured a fault but too com- mon already — the putting off baptism to the hour of death ; in order to live at large, and enjoy the pleasure of an unrestrained licentious- ness — a fault which the Church hath never tolerated, esteeming it that as baptism is the first bond which unites us with Christ, and the first sacrament which constitutes us members of his mys- tical body, it were a crime to deprive one's self of such an advan- tage, merely upon account of the obligations annexed to it. In this, therefore, as in other respects, Tertullian was misled by pre- sumptuously relying on his own understanding. But, inasmuch as he maintained that baptism was a painful and burdensome engao-e- ment, he spoke with propriety. Did not Jesus Christ himself inculcate the same doctrine ? And doth he not propose to us his law as a yoke ? " Take my yoke upon you." Matt. xi. If it be urged that there are, among the Christian people, who feel not the incumbrance of this yoke : ah ! brother, (rej)Hes St. Augustin,) it may really be so, nay, it really is so ; but beware of confounding things that ought to be accurately distinguished. For you feel not the weight of the baptismal yoke, either because God supplies you with strength to undergo it, or because you shake it off by a base infidelity. If it be the heavenly unction of grace which makes you not perceive it, blessed be God, I envy yoiu* con- dition, far from making you doubtful concerning it. But, on the conti-ary, if it be not burdensome, either because you cany it not at all, or because you carry it only by halves ; if it be not burden- some, because you suit it to your inclinations, and think you may adapt it to the comforts of life ; if it be not burdensome, because you reduce it to a superficial and merely seeming austerity, and take upon you no more of it than just what you like, you have reason to tremble with fear, and be dismayed. For the yoke which you imagine you have shaken off, will one day overwhelm you ; 112 ON THE LOVE OF GOD. and the duties which you neglect, will be the cause of your condem- nation at the judgment of God. 2ndly. From hence we may judge, how generous and forcible ought to be in a Christian the love of his Creator, as it needs must have a virtue proportioned to the holy and rigorous obHgations which baptism imposes. I call them obHgations, beloved Chris- tians, and not merely and in strict propriety vows ; for a vow, (says St. Thomas,) in its proper signification, is a thing which is left to my free option, which God commands not, and without which I might obtain salvation, and arrive at my end. Now the case is otherwise with the obligation of baptism. For whereas, since the rise of the Christian religion, baptism is the only way that leads mankind to salvation ; the obligations annexed to it are of absolute necessity ; and w^hen I submit to it, whatever obedience I pay to God, I make him not that entirely voluntary sacrifice which a vow expresses. Thus, divines reason upon this matter, not in order to take away from faithful souls the comfort of beheving that they are firmly engaged to God by vows, so they allow these vows to be of such a natm'c, as that God hath not left them to their own disposal ; so they own that besides these vows of necessity, there are others of counsel ; by which God is honoured in a special manner, and by which men are raised to a greater and more emi- nent degree of perfection ; such are the vows of religion and the priesthood : finally, so they do not unthinkingly countenance, or virtually abet the errors of certain modern heresiarchs, who, to var- nish their apostacy in the eyes of the world, perpetually extolled, under colour of reformation, the vow of baptism, to decry that of chastity, which they had shamefully abandoned. But whether we call them obligations or vows, it is undoubtedly true that they add great difficulty to the first commandment, "thou shalt love the Lord ;" inasmuch as it is impossible, in the law of grace, to pro- duce an act of divine love, without an absolute will sincerely to fulfil whatever is contained in the profession of Christianity. I shall proceed a step farther, and shall conclude -with a reflec- tion of William of Paris ; a reflection worthy of the zeal and piety of that great bishop, but which I should fear communicating to you if I had not reason to depend equally on your piety and under- standing. It is this : for an act of divine love to have the chai*acter of perfection requisite for salvation, it is not enough that it extend absolutely to all the precepts, whether natural or positive, of the ON THE LOVE OF GOD. 113 Christian law, it must farther conditionally take in the counsels. I say conditionally, and pray mind the term ; so that if it were necessary, in order to make appear my love of God, to put in prac- tice everything the most grating and mortifying in the evangelic counsels, everything the most humihating and the most repugnant to natute and self-love, in virtue of this single act, " I love God;" I should be disposed to undertake and to suffer all. Nor is this, though conditional, a chimerical disposition. Nothing is more real. For, as there is not a gospel counsel which may not, nay, which doth not, in a thousand emergencies, become a com- mandment, the love of God must put me habitually in the dispo- sition in which it is my duty to be, and inspire me with the resolution which I ought to have, as often as I fall into these con- junctures. Thus, nothing obliges me to withdraw from the world, and betake myself to sohtude ; but my duty obliges me to be always prepared for both the one and the other ; because such might be my weakness, that the world would be for me a rock on which my innocence would split, and that nothing would remain to secm-e it but solitude. To quit all things for God, is a counsel only, accord- ing to the doctrine dehvered by our Saviour ; but to be ready to quit them, is a rigorous precept, because experience might convince me that I could not retain the possession of them Avithout being attached to them ; nor be attached to them without the loss of my soul. God doth not command me to undergo martyrdom ; but he commands me to have always a resolution to undergo it ; because it is possible, that on some occasion or other, martyrdom might be an indispensable proof of my faith. Hence Tertullian, speaking of the faith of Christians, says that it makes us responsible to God for ourselves, insomuch, that it obligeth us to suffer martyrdom whenever his honour and glory are concerned. Now this obligation is imposed on you equally by the law of charity. Tell me then. Christians, when the martys were con- tented, in the days of persecution, to be sacrificed like victims ; when they suffered all the rage of fire and faggot ; when they were stretched on wheels, and bore the lashes of scorpion- whips ; when they imderwcnt patiently, and with invincible courage, for the \o\e of their God, all the rigour of torments, did they perform a work of supererogation, and that could be dispensed with ? No : it was necessary according to the law of charity ; and had they not acted with all that resolution, and all that coumge, God would hare 1 14 ON THE LOVE OF GOD. doomed them to reprobation. This the gospel evidently declares : and for that reason, those were rejected from the communion of the faithful who did not resist to the effusion of their blood. No sort of regard was paid to their weakness. So far from it, they were declared apostates, and cut off as members unworthy of Christ Jesus. The martyrs who triumphed over the cruelty of execu- tioners were extolled for having done their duty, and no more. If a recreant fear had made them yield the palm, instead of loading tliem with her benedictions, the Church would have struck them with the thunder of her anathemas. How I Is then the commandment of loving God in that extreme degree of strictness ? Yes, beloved hearers ; and if it surprise us, it is owing to our not as yet knowing God, or not taking care to measure the perfection of divine love by the laws of the world ; for we pride ourselves in the like fidelity with regard to our king and country. It is looked upon among men as a duty to be in readi- ness to die for men ; and this is dignified with that towering appe- lation — a point of honour. Every day we see the vnse ones of this world, from similar motives, sacrificing their rest, their health, and their lives ; and because in all tliis they have for the most part only interested views — ^they are martyrs to the world. Tell me then, Avhy should it seem sti'ange that God should require a return, not inferior from those who love him ? Why should it seem strange, that as the world hath its martyrs, charity should have hers ? Nevertheless, Christians, were we legally required to give to God this testimony of our love, should we be disposed to do it ? If, at the moment I speak, we were reduced to tliis alternative, either to renounce him or to die, would many of us become mar- tyrs ? Excuse me, Christians, from answering to an interrogatory, which would expose me to the danger of being too forward, either in presuming on your constancy or diffiding in your weakness. What I know, my brethren, and what I learn from theology, is this : that if our breasts be actuated with that love wliich is the great commandment of the laAv, without other preparation of heart or understanding, v/e are fully disposed to become martyrs to our God ; and that if there be anything in our disposition which woidd hinder us from becoming martyi's to our God, whatever feelings we may otherwise have for him, we have not as yet that love whicli the law expressly commands. Some say that it is dangerous to make these dangerous suppositions : and I hold it, on the con- ON THE LOVE OF GOD. 116 traiy, that these suppositions are of infinite utility : in the first place, to impress us with an enlarged idea of the excellence and greatness of the God whom we serve ; in the next, to inspire our minds with noble and generous sentiments, as often as we are bound to obey his commands ; lastly, to humble us, and put us to confusion, whenever we fail in certain easy and common duties, since charity lays on us such great injunctions. But these suppositions, formed in the imagination in a lively manner, may lead to despair. Yes, Christians, they may ; but in whom ? Those who put their trust in their own strength, not those who depend upon the force of grace ; since notliing, on the contrary, is fitter to awaken and animate our hope than the great- ness and difficulty of this commandment. For, it is enough for me to know, that God obliges me to it, and that it infinitely sur- passes whatever I can do of my natural power, to be assured that God, who is observant of his promise, will infallibly supply me Avith aid proportionable to what he commands. And this is the stay that upholds Christian hope ; whereas smaller precepts, on account of then- facility, are but too often productive of presumption. Ah ! my brethren, I now conceive whence arises the efficacy, or rather the omnipotence of divine charity. When I was told, heretofore, that there needed but an act of the love of God to blot out all sin ; when I heard the example of Magdalen adduced, who had expiated by this one Internal act all the wickedness of her life ; when the authority of the fathers of the Church was quoted, who unanimously assert, that this act, if sincere, hath virtue to justify the sinner, adequate to martyrdom : though I assented to this doc- trine, because authorized by faith, I could hardly relish it, because I was unable to enter into the nature and spirit of it. But now, my God, it gives me no surprise : for, it is but reasonable, that as our love of you is a disposition to martyrdom, it should Include a power and virtue equal to that of martyrdom ; and that as it com- prises all the promises and obligations inherent In baptism, it should sanctify and purify the soul by baptism. But, if this be true, beloved Christians, and if all I have said be requisite to produce an act of. divine love, where is the man that truly loves God. This is a secret of predestination which we ought to beware of examining too narrowly. Almighty God hath predestinated some, and knows them. Let not the number, Avhe- ther great or small, give us any uneasiness; but let us use our 116 ON PENANCE. endeavours, as far as we are able, to be one day associated with that blessed host. The apostle of the Gentiles would often lay himself prostrate before the Father of mercies, to beg and beseech he would give him the supereminent science of his love. Let us prefer the same prayer, and ask of him this science, which, among all sciences, holds the first place. Let us say with St. Augustin : " Ah ! my Lord, I have kno^vn you too late." I say it to my shame, and own it to my sorrow, that in the coiu-se of my Hfe, I have not, perhaps, formed one act of perfectly divine love. And how should I form it, O my God, inasmuch as I knew not in what it consisted, or what it included ? But now that by instruction I am come to the knowledge of it, I am determined to love you in the fidness of my heart, to love you with all the powers of my soul. I am determined to love you in the manner I ought, and as you require it. I am determined to love you with a love of preference, with a love of plenitude, with a love of perfection. Do this Christians, and you shall live. After loving God in time, you shall love and possess him in a blessed eternity. SERMON XXIL ON PENANCE. " He came into all the country round about Jordan, preaching the baptism of penance unto the remission of sins." Luke ii. How bad soever, beloved Christians, may be the condition of mankind in the state of sin, if all repentance of siu were true, and if true and false penitence were distinguishable on all occa- sions, the sinner might have comfort in his very misfortune, and might look upon his sin as an infallible resource, and secure ground for tranquillity and peace. What renders his case (accord- ing to St. Chrysostom) deplorable is, that although to be sure of the reality of sin, the validity of his penitence must always remain absolutely doubtful ; that this very penitence, or what he calls his penitence, ought oftentimes as much as the sin itself to disturb his mind ; that all the oracles of the scripture declare we cannot be ON PENANCE. 117 saved but by true penance ; and that a thousand others, false and shadoAvy, imperfect and insufficient are productive of damnation. Should he happen to deceive himself, and for want of discernment in the practice of penance, take falsehood for truth, thinking that sufficient which proves ineffectual, he falls into as deep and dan- gerous an abyss as the most unfortimate sinners; because that which should have been his justification and salvation, becomes a partial cause of his damnation and ruin. And this, if he rightly understands his reHgion, ought to make him tremble. Would you set your consciences, dear Christians, as much at ease as possible on so important a head ? And would you, to that end, know what true penitence is ; or, rather, in what consists the discernment, by which you may know what is true penance ? This is what I am going to set forth and enlarge upon in the present discourse, the whole scope of which I shall give you in a few words. That I call true and secure penance, which the holy precursor, St. John the Baptist, preached to the people who came to seek him in the wilderness, when he said : " Bring forth fruits worthy of penance." Matt. iii. He was not content that they should barely repent, but farther insisted, that they should judge of their peni- tence by the fruits thereof. For, penitence is not solid, nor accep- table to God, but as it is efficacious ; and can it in reason be deemed efficacious otherwise than by the fruit it produces ? " Bring forth fruits worthy of penance." These fruits I reduce to three ; and I say with all the fathers of the Chm'ch, that efficacious penance, Fu'st, generously removes the cause and matter of sin : Secondly, repairs fully the effects and consequences of sin : Thirdly, makes the sinner submit faithfully to the remedies for sin. These three characteristics make up, on one hand, the perfection of penance ; and give, on the other, a moral certainty to the peni- tent sinner. If, beloved hearers, they accompany your penitence, you may rely upon it without rashness or presumption ; but should one of them be wanting, it is utterly unprofitable, not to say cri- minal. Replenish, O Lord, our hearts with thy spirit, that spirit of zeal which fired the breast of St. John the Baptist : this I beg for myself: that spirit of compunction which fceUngly touched the VOL. If. I 118 ON PENANCE. hearts of the Jews, and disposed them to profit by the gi'cat veri- ties which that faithful minister announced to them : this 1 beg, not only for myself, but for all those who hear my words. Part I. My first proposition I ground on two incontestable principles, of which, if we have been at all careful to study our dis- position or the motions of our heart, our own experience is suffi- cient to convince us. For, how corrupt soever, (as St. Augustin observes,) what by the fall of the first man, and our own trans- gressions, our nature may be, we do not love sin, considered as such. None but the devils have those dispositions, if even the devils have ; for, it is a matter of doubt, whether they carry their obstinacy and malice to that pitch. We are pleased with the matter and cause of sin, but not, at bottom, with sin itself: that is, we take pleasure in what God forbids, but not because it is for- bidden by him. We desire the profit arising from usury, which is to act unjustly ; but the profit, not the injustice, is the object of our desire. We love revenge, which is repugnant to the law of God, because we imagine our honour is engaged ; but not because it is repugnant to the law. Further : we would separate, if possible, the one from the other. We would have what we like (an abstraction the libertine would gladly admit of) to be quite unconnected with God's prohibition. We would have the Almighty to be not offended at the pleasure we take in gratifying our passions. In a word, we would give way, -without sinning, to our perverse appetites. But as these are inseparable, and as in the conjuncture in which I now suppose the sinner, the vehement desire of indulo-ing the senses overrules the fear of offending the Deity : hence, (says St. Augustin,) though he loves not the sin, though he hath it in abhorrence, he sins not- withstanding, by admitting complacency. The reason is, that he loves what he knows, what he cannot but know to be the cause of sin, or the matter of sin. Now this is enough, whether he ■will or not, to make him a trangressor against the law of God, and a prevaricator. This is the first principle : and, observe, Christians, that it is not precisely by the hatred of sin, considered as such, that we ought to distinguish between reformed sinners and those who are not ; a hatred the most obdurate stUl preserve, or at least may pre- serve, if they have any the least traces of religion lefl. It is not, I say, by this general rule, this speculative hatred that we must ON PENANCE. 119 frame our notions of the fruits of penance, as that kind of hatred, it is well known, gives the sinner no trouble ; a hatred common to empty and fruitless, as well as to solid and efficacious penance. But how shall we begin to discern in ourselves this true peni- tence, and what I here call a sincere and efficacious detestation of Bin ? Hearken, Christians, and judge by this practical induction. By actually and effectually cutting off whatever we discover in ourselves to be the cause of sin, or fomenting and nourishing that body of sin, (Kom. vi.,) which God, at our conversion, wills us to destroy. By relinquishing a thousand agi'eeable things, the car- nal man's delight, but which, for that reason, are incentives to evil, and poison to the soul. By decUning those objects that excite in the heart pernicious desires, which, according to the scripture, " when concupiscence conceiveth, it bringeth forth sin." James i. By a scrupulous carefulness of avoiding conversations, of which we know how the baneful licentiousness corrupts and enfeebles purity of manners, as they give occasion to the first wounds, and not infrequently the most incurable, that sin inflicts. By a severe, salutary, necessary resolution of giving up such inter- courses, as we know by experience, are the bonds of sin : exhibi- tions and spectacles, the effect of which is, to stir up in the heart the most lively passions, and to diffuse in the imagination the most dangerous ideas, the seeds of immorality : assemblies and routs, in which the spu'it of impurity reigns, and can lay inevitable snares for innocence ; romances and novels, by which oiu* cmiosity is so justly punished by the malignant impression they leave behind. By an unreserved sacrifice of those friendships, the unfortunate tenderness of which we perceive, although covered with a veil of modesty, is nothing in reality but vice in disguise. By a speedy and eternal separation from the person, whose subtile artifices, as well as charms, are fatal allurements to sinful courses. By a holy violence which every one of us is bound to offer himself on all these heads, as, according to the apostle, they are " instruments of ini- quity to sin." In a word, by that evangelical circumcision, which stops not at outward show and alterations, but searches the inmost , recesses of the heart, and destroys radically every efficient of sin it meets with. Thus the sinner must judge of the virtue and efficacy of his penance ; and thus, whenever he is under a necessity of approach- ing that sacrament which Christ hath instituted for the reconci r 2 120 ON PENANCE. liation of sinners, he must think of fulfilling the precept of the scripture : " Let a man prove himself," (1 Cor. xv.) and as much as may be in this life, secure his salvation. Now this he may do (according to St. Chrysostom) by following the documents here laid down ; and I add, that it is only by following them he can do it. " Take away words, and return to the Lord." Osea xiv. Thus spoke the prophets, exhorting the people of Israel to repentance ; and this, O sinnei', to whom I address myself, this is the duty my ministry obliges me, this day, to discharge. You say you detest, you renounce your sin ; and what you say, you believe to be true. Perhaps you deceive yourself in the testimony you bear in your own favour, and your hearty contrition in the presence of God, is just the reverse of what you imagine. Perhaps the dishonour accruing from sin affects you more than its real malignity ; the remorse and uneasiness it creates in your mind, than the atrocious injury done to your Maker ; the trouble and embarrassment into which it throws you, than the wrath of God Avhich it draws upon you : if so, your contrition is human. Perhaps your mistake pro- ceeds from this, that you confound the grace of penitence which is in you, -vvith penance itself, of which you have no share, and the desire of conversion with which God inspires you with conversion itself, from which you are far distant : if so, your contrition is not real. But you wish to be delivered from this uncertainty; would you know the internal state of your soul: " Take away words," always equivocal, always ambiguous. I shall lay do^vn the rule by which you may steer your course with safety through the storms of life and billows of temptation. Let us then discuss the point minutely : I shall advance nothing unbecoming the subject, nothing beneath the dignity of the pulpit. You are a man of the world, a man distinguished by your illus- trious Inrth ; but your affairs (a case at this day but too common) are fallen into a distracted and confused situation : whether by your fault or by your misfortune, is not material. Thus circumstanced, what precipitates you into a thousand sins, is living beyond the extent of your income, instigated by vanity and the apprehen- sion of appearing to decline in fortune. Hence numberless injus- tices : hard-heartedness to your creditors, to the industrious trades- man at whose expense you live, to the poor mechanic whom you keep in misery, to the faithful servant whose Avages you detain. Hence these frivolous and deceitful promises, that abuse of your ON PENANCE. 121 credit, those shlilbs to put off, or elude payment. Hence that con- tinual load of debts, which, by ruining the creditor, damn the debtor. Retrench these expenses : and if you would convince me of an unfeigned contrition, as your estate is but small, be a good economist, and live within compass. Let not what you are, but what you can do, be the rule of your conduct. Put away that costliness of attire, that superfluity of retinue, that ostentation of caniages, that excessive delicacy in the choice of furniture. Re- duced to poverty and extreme indigence, undergo your distresses with Christian fortitude ; bear patiently the rod of divine correc- tion, and convert your necessity into virtue and merit. It is need- less, other\vise, to deplore your iniquity ; it is needless to repent, or rather to make a show of a fruitless repentance — a repentance consisting of words only, though deeds be required, and that we "take away words and return to the Lord." You are fond of gaming, which ruins your conscience ; gaming without rule, measure or limitation ; gaming, no longer your diver- sion intended to unbend the mind, but your business, your trade, your inclination, your passion ; gaming of which we may literally gay, " deep calleth on deep :" for thence an infinity of sin proceed, as forge tfulness of your duty, irregularity in your family, pernicious example given to your cliildren, squandering your fortune, knavish tricks, rage and despair. Put an end to this practice ; and as it is much easier to renounce it utterly, than to pursue it with moder- ation, make a public declaration of the resolution you have taken ; give God, by laying the axe to the root, an undeniable proof that your contrition is sincere ; and in order to convince yourself that you are steadfastly resolved to refrain from sin, lay it down as a rule, from which no persuasion shall induce you to swerve, that you will never game more. In any other supposition, you may cry out to no purpose with the publican in the gospel — Lord, be propitious unto me a sinner, I acknowledge my crime. Your voice is the voice of Jacob, but your hands are hands of Esau. " Take away words and return unto the Lord." In fine, sift your conscience, without prepossession, in the pre- sence of God, and find out, by a strict and minute examination," the incentive to sin ; but find it out prepared, and fully resolved, to make a thorough holocaust, excepting or retaining no part of the sacrifice. By these means you will know if you are ti-uly peni- tent. Attack sin, not in idea, but in very deed, sapping its foun- 122 ON PENANCE. dation, and destroying its superstructure. This St. Paul calls running, not a hazard, but with a determined view of arriving at the goal ; this he calls fighting, not at random, nor by beating the air, but by pursuing the enemy, and felling him to the ground : " I so run," says he, " as not to hazard ; I so fight, as not to beat the air." 1 Cor. ix. Proceed we to the other principle. Our thoughts and the first motions of the heart are not always at command ; but we are always responsible for our actions and our conduct. And when, on some dangerous occasion, we yield to temptation, from which we were bound by the law to retire, but in which, notwithstanding, we wilfully persisted, we have no right to say, we could not ; but would not manfully make head against the enemy. A sinner, I own, beloved Christians, may be thoroughly con- verted, and yet be liable to some weaknesses, and may bewail his misfortune for the same reason, and in the same spmt that the great apostle did, and like him say : "I feel another law in my members, repugnant to the law of my mind, and biinging me into captivity unto the law of sin." But, observe, (says St. Chrysos- tom,) that when he spoke in that manner, he at the same time protested, that he was " not conscious to himself of anything ;" (1 Cor. iv. ;) that he was faithful to grace : that he walked in the dangerous way of salvation with fear and trembHng ; and that " he chastised his body and brought it into servitude." 1 Cor. ix. Now this declaration of his faithfulness, vigilance, austerity of life and attention to himself, secm-ed him from delusion, when he com- plained that his passions rebelled against him, and he grieved to be reduced to so mortifying a situation. But the method of hypocrisy is, to complain of weakness, and yet encounter temptation, to resist which all the strength and vu*tue of the saints themselves would scarce be sufiicient. The method of hypocrisy is, to lament the violent attacks of passion, and yet rush into dangers blindly and inconsiderately, in which passions the most moderate are hardly governable. The method of hypocrisy is, to cry, " O unhappy man that I am," (Rom. vii.,) bom so sensual and so frail ! and to seek, notwithstanding this open acknowledgment, occasions of sinning against God's command, in which human frailty, from a mere misfortune, becomes a crime, or at least the original of all crimes. Such is the nature of penitential hypocrisy : and this is the judgment you ought to form of it. ON TENANCE. 123 You are weak, I grant : the law of sin pi'cvaila in you ; concu- piscence rules you ; you carry with you your enemy, which is your flesh. But I hold, for that reason, that you trifle with Ood, if, while you lament your sinful state, you try not to remove the occasion of sin ; and that you he to the Holy Ghost, and that there is in your penitence an enormous contradiction — if, on one hand, knowing yourself weak, you are not, on the other, more watchful and circumspect. For with what face can you say, like David, sighing and weeping, " I have sinned against the Lord," (1 Kings, xii.,) whilst you obstinately persist in proximate danger, and ha- zarding thereby both your conscience and salvation, without other oflTence, are guilty of sin against God and yourself? How can you allege the infirmity of your soul, as a motive to depx'ccate the •vvrath of God, while to that Infirmity of soul you join infidelity and malignity ? Yes, I say infidelity and malignity : to beseech the Almighty to cure your illness, and not seek preservation against that which destroys you ; to acknowledge your illness, and act as though you enjoyed a state of perfect health ; to call upon heaven to testify your anguish, and never to resolve, in virtue of that anguish, to sacrifice anything, or remit of anything. AVhat would you by this ? Would you not impose upon God and man ? No, no, beloved hearers, while you act in this mannei*, your pe- nitence being made up of dissimulation and falsehood, you cannot apply these plaintive words, hke St. Paul, to yourself: " I do not the good which I would, but the evil which I hate, that I do." For whereas St. Paul was inconsolable to find, that he did not the good which he wished to do, nor avoided the evil which he wished to avoid, you run precipitate into the other extreme, and avoid the good which you like to avoid, and perform the evil which you like to perform. The efiScacy, therefore, of penance, consists in ge- nerously quitting the occasion of sin, in order to overcome it ; and not attempting to overcome it, by sluggishly remaining in the occasion of it. And here it were needful to have all the zeal and spirit of the prophet," to put the hardened sinner to confusion. For such, in these times, is the decay of morals, that a confessor shall be treated as difiicult and scrupulous, forbidding and unqua^ lified, that shall suspend those who voluntarily persist in certain dangers, from the grace of absolution. But what more evident proof can be given of the bad disposition with which the man of 124 ON PENANCE. the world approaches the penitential tribunal, than that he is determined, at all events, to return again to the same company and to the same places, in which his innocence hath so often suffered shipwreck ? If ever he ought to exert the poAver conferred on him of binding consciences, is it not now ? He sees, and so do you, that the detestable continuance of so many relapses turas on one circumstance, from which no intreaty can induce you to forbear. Yet should he consent to pronounce the form of absolution over you, far from approving of, ought you not to be offended at his weak condescension ? Would it not be diabolically perverting, instead of holily dispensing, God's sacred mysteries ? God forbid. Christians, that I should pretend to authorize the severity which hath oftentimes, perhaps without grounds, been imputed to some ministers of the Lord in the administration of penance. But God forbid, likevdse, that I should ever countenance the criminal and dangerous acquiescence of others in that divine tribunal. Now can anything be more dangerous, anything more criminal, than to permit a sinner to participate of the sacraments, who is obstinately bent upon remaining in the occasion of so many relapses ? But if we may believe you, they are occasions which it is not in your power to quit ; and I say they are occasions which you would readily quit, if the making of your fortune depended thereon, or if some temporal affair, which you chance to have in hand, might be brought thereby to the wished for issue. But, say you, they are ties which cannot be broken without noise and scandal. To this I answer : the great scandal is, that you do not break them ; I say, admitting that such allegation is founded in truth, it were better to bear with the salutary scandal which should put a stop to sin, and save your soul, than keep up and foment the mortal scandal which brings ruin upon you, and which is itself an additional sin. But God Avill afford me his divine protection, and it is in him alone I place this confidence. An accursed confidence, (says St. Chrysostom,) the sole end of which is, to 'tempt the Almighty and give man a handle to persist in impenitence. Ah ! my God, that this doctrine is not eternally preached ! that it is not preached in season and out of season ! that it is not preached in all places and to all people, as upon it depends the conversion, the reformation, the sanctification, and the happiness of the Christian world ! Be that as it may, beloved hearers, place not an entiie rehance on your ON PENANCE. 125 penitence ; and though it should be, seemingly, ever so fervent, esteem it as unavailing, if it only retrench the matter and cause, and proceed not to repair the effects and consequences of sin, as I now shall make appear in the second part. Part II. As sacramental penitence is an act of justice, and as the fathers of the Church have always represented it as implying in the sinner a sincere Avill to do justice to himself, to his neigh- bour, and to God, it is a natural inference, that one of its principal functions is to repair the effects and consequences of sin. Here, then, beloved hearers, supposing the incontestable and indispen- sable necessity of this reparation, we are to comprehend it tho- roughly and in its full extent, as it is the only rule by which a rational and exact judgment may be formed of penance. For this pm-jjose, I shall adhere to two important maxims of Holy Writ, that must reform two visible and dangerous abuses which we are liable to fall into at the very time we are planning our conversion. This doctrine is of great ^moment ; and I earnestly request you would tiu-n it to advantage. The first maxim : to be efficaciously converted, it is not suffi- cient barely to repent ; we must bring forth fruits worthy of pen- ance. This is what St. John the Baptist teaches, a man deputed by God himself to prepare for the Lord a perfect people. This is the instruction he gave those Jews who came to hear him in the wilderness, and presented themselves to him Avith a view to be bap- tized. This was his inference, when, replete with the spirit of Elias, he bid them "bring forth fruits worthy of penance." For (as St. Gregory, pope, observes) this divine harbinger thereby declared, that penance and its fruits (as a tree and its fruits) were distinct things ; that, not content with earnestly bewailing antece- dent offences, it entered upon measures of avoiding future ones ; that to bewail offences, and even to renounce them for the remain- der of life, is only the root, but grace and salvation the fruits of penance, which should it not bear, it is exposed to malediction. By these means he worthily fulfilled his ministry, teaching the obdu- rate sinner to do penance, and the penitent sinner to " bring forth fruits worthy of penance." Now which are these salutary fruits of penance ? To repair the pernicious effects of sin by contrary works, according to the specific differences thereof. My meaning is this : to repair, for instance, the effects of unjust possession, by restitution ; of detraction and 126 ^ ON PENANCE. calumny, by retrieving your neighbour's honour and reputation ; of passion and outrage, by making humble satisfaction ; of enmity and hatred, by a sincere reconciliation. These (says St. Gregory) are the worthy fruits, the proportional fruits, the necessary fruits, the unsuspected fruits of penance. They ai*e all essential, and must be severally elucidated. Worthy fruits of penance : because the sinner, to produce them, must use such efforts as true, I mean supernatural, nay, the most supernatural penance is capable of. What other motive can induce the rich miser to restore that which, by fraud or oppression, he hath acquired or withholden, and of which he cannot give up the possession without losing his place, or sinking in credit ; and the restormg of which becomes, by that means, more afflicting and insupportable than death itself? What other motive can induce the haughty disdainful man to take mortifying steps, in order to satisfy, at the expense of his pride, those whom he hath offended ? And should himself be offended, what other motive can induce him to stifle his rage and resentment, and be cordially reconciled with his most mortal enemy ? This must be the work, O Lord, of your hand ; the strength of man is unequal to such great and extraor- dinary changes. Your grace must assist him — your most powerful grace. By that he must conceive, by that bring forth these heroic resolutions, which otherwise the corrupt spuit of the world would render abortive. It is by grace, O God, that you subdue the most rebellious and obstinate hearts ; that fierce and violent spirits relent, and that the most untractable become mild as lambs ; that the un- just possessor gives up his pretensions to another's right, and to his own right too, conferring, like Zacheus, on the injured party four- fold. And if, O Lord, you give a blessing to my words — words which are your own, we shall see by the effects of this victorious penance unexpected miracles, for which your servants Avill offer up their acts of thanksgiving and gratitude, and which will give greater edification to your church, than the very miracles by which she was established. Then shall we see injustices repaired, calum- nies retracted, enmities extinguished, hearts reunited. Worthy fruits these, of which the Holy Ghost himself is the author, and which are styled by St. Paul, <' the fi-uit of hght in all goodness, and righteousness, and truth." Ephes. v. Proportional fruits : to what ? To the offence. Otherwise peni- tence is not only defective, but hateful ; not only reprobated by ON PENANCE. 127 the Deity, but condemned by the world ; for the world still requires proportion in this case. You have grown rich at the expense of the widow and the orphan, and think yourself clear of all obligation by some good works from which no advantage can possibly accrue to the Avidow and the orphan. You have traduced your neigh- bour, and wounded liis reputation, and think it sufficient atone- ment to fulfil in his regard the mere obligations of common charity. You have formed devices, and run into exaggerations, to ruin your enemy, and your penitence terminates in weeping and praying in the presence of God. Execrable prayers ! says the wise man. And I say, appljdng the same expression to the present subject, execra- ble penitence ! for that the penitent, in the very act of penitence, will not hearken to the Almighty and obey his laws. The same reason is given for it by the divine Spirit : " He that turneth away his ears from hearing the law, his prayer shall be held in execra- tion." Prov. xxi. No, no, beloved hearers ; according to the invio- lable and indispensable order which God hath established, defa- mation can never be repaired by prayer, nor injustice by alms-deeds. To have the merit, before God, of efficacious penitence, we must strictly obeserve the proportions prescribed by the divine law; and instead of conforming our penitence to our fancy, or even to our devotion, we are obliged to conform both penitence and devotion to the rules and dictates of an upright conscience. Now an upright conscience will never allow us to give to God alone what we have defrauded our neighbour of, nor to apply to charity what we owe to justice ? To God, (it will say,) the things that are God's, and to Cajsar the things that are Cajsar's. This is the law, the eternal law, the invariable laAV, which it obliges us to follow. Necessary fruits : for in vain should we wring and rack our ima- gination to find out expedients, explications, and subterfuges ; wc must come, at last, to St. Augustin's decision ; a decision, against which neither the immoderate desires, nor the looseness of morals, nor the corrupt and evil practices of the times, will ever get pre- scription. If, when in your power, you refuse to restore that which leans heavily and reasonably on your conscience, making show of a contrite and penitent heart, you may seem, indeed, to do penance, but you do it not. The sin is not pardoned, but on this condition — that damage be repaired. Now if this be true with regard to property, it is equally so with regard to reputation. Go then, if you will ; go, lay yourself prostrate at the feet of the priest; 128 ON PENANCE. "" confess your injustice ; pour forth floods of tears ; if you take not due measures to make suitable amends for the damage you have done by false suppositions, or unjust animadversions — by the malice of your heart, or the indiscretion of your tongue, what is your pen- ance ? A phantom, and nothing else. A phantom, did I say ? It is a crime, it is a sacrilege. Certain and unsuspected fruits : there can be no doubt that a sinner, who submits to this reparation, is solidly converted. It is a pledge which the most rigid censors, I mean the most severe con- fessors, have no right to call in question. With the other fruits of penance, ostentation or hypocrisy may be blended imperceptibly. But there is no fear, in this case, of either the one or the other. What man (supposing his conversion fictitious) would undergo the mortification of giving back what he might keep, or of retracting what he had rashly and falsely advanced ? He must be effectually converted, to condemn himself so rigorously, Avithout favour or forgiveness. The efficacy of his penance cannot then be doubted, not that he can be thoroughly assured of his estate. No one (says the wise man) knoweth whether he be deserving of love or hatred. It is one of those secrets which God hath been pleased to reserve to himself, to make us live in a more absolute dependance on his grace. But of all the signs by which we may distinguish true pen- ance, the most infallible, indisputably, is the reparation of the effects and consequences of sin ; a reparation, which leaves a calm tranquillity in the soul, that blunts the piercing stings of con- science, and that brings the blessed peace, in which (according to Tertullian) consists the felicity of a justified sinner : " Bring forth [therefore] fruits worthy of penance." But, beloved Christians, what is the delusion of these times ? Instead of judging of penance by its fruits, which would stand the test, we judge of it by practices in themselves equivocal, which often carry with them more of show than solidity. We would have sinners, as of old, be humbled in ashes, covered mth rough hair-cloth, and extenuated with fasting. A very captivating, but deceitful outside, if the natural right of charity and justice be not satisfied ! It is expected that the discipline which the church of God hath in process of time thought proper to mitigate, will bo strictly adhered to. I would to God it were ! but on this capital and essential condition — that the fundamental laws, which neither ON PENANCE. 129 the church nor God hath ever dispensed with, be strictly observed. This, however, is never thought of — that is, in the true Pharisaical spirit, we keep floating on the surface, but never dive, which we should do, to the bottom. The second scriptural maxim : " We forecast says (St. Paul) that which may be good, not only before God, but also before men." 2 Cor. viii. And I say, by the same rule, it is not enough that the sinner do penance in the sight of God ; he must do it likewise in the sight of men. He doth it before God, by acknowledging his fault ; but he doth it before men, by taking away the very appearance of sin. Otherwise — (and it is the decision of St. Thomas, and of all other divines) — otherwise his penitence is ineffec- tual and nidi. I wish I had it in my power, beloved hearers, to convey this doctrine to you in its full extent and full force ! The scandal of sin must be repaired by penance. For, wo be to us, shoidd we fall into the error of those broachers of heterodox tenets, who, under the insidious cloak of reformation, corrupt the law, and reduce all penance to sinning no more ! Wo be to us, should we falsely imagine, that the mystery of justification is comprised in the words of our blessed Saviour not rightly understood, when he said to the adulteress, " Go, and now sin no more." John viii. For, according to that, it were sufiicient for the unrighteous man to say : " I have relinquished my sin ;" more vain, perhaps, (St. Gregory observes,) at the testimony he bears to his sinning no more, than humble at the remembrance of his having often sinned ; or feasting in the sweets of self-complacency at the ceasing of his sin, and laying claim to the unspotted innocence of the righteous, without partici- pating, in the least degi-ee, of the humihation of sinners. But the scandal (says this great pope and doctor) is a part of the sin ; for which, if no reparation be made, though the sin itself cease, or to speak more clearly, though you cease to commit it, it is not entirely and absolutely destroyed. Penitence, therefore, having regulated the one, must apply to the other ; and as it cannot do this, but at the sinner's expense, it must, if efficacious, (according to St. Augus- tin,) blot out and annihilate sin in his person, and in order to that, must put him to confusion. Otherwise, (continues this holy father,) what example, what edification would you give your neighbour ? And if it be true that your sin was attended with these conse- quences that you so much lament ; if by going astray yourself, you 130 ON PENANCE. have led others astray, is it not agreeable to right reason that you should, as much as in you lies, be instrumental in reclaiming them? Is it not according to the rules of justice, that as you have scanda- lized them by a loose conduct, you should try to edify them by a penitential life ? This, however, is not the usual way of reasoning among man- kind. And is not the world overrun with persons who judge according to the desires of their heart, and who think it prudent, in the teeth of all the oracles of heaven, to reserve to themselves, in the very state of their supposed repentance, whatever they can of their former follies, and whatever may conduce to foment and flatter their self-love ; the pleasures of converse, the splendor of prosperity, the pomp and peageantry of wordly vanity ; in a word, all the external concomitants of sin ? Who, not content to appear what they were, and by consequence, to be so in every deed, as the appearance of sin hath a necessary connexion with the grounds of sin : I say, not content to keep up externally the same conduct and train of life, would fain persuade themselves, that in this they proceed upon solid principles, and according to the dictates of right reason ? Now it is to these prejudiced and deluded souls that I wish to be of service on this occasion, by representing the consequences of their errors to them in a clear and unequivocal point of view. Was it thus — would I say, actuated with the zeal with which God inspires me for their eternal welfare — was it thus, that so many celebrated penitents were converted to the Lord? Were these the resolute steps they took, when, led by the Spirit, they first entered into the way of penance ? Did they not gene- rously and openly embrace humility, austerity and holy retirement ? How did yoiu" Achabs and your Nebuchadnezzars in the old law appear in the presence of God and man ? Was it not in sack-cloth and an humble posture, in order to retrieve, by an authentic decla- ration, the mischievous effects of their scandalous lives ? In the law of grace, to what did penitents without end, of all conditions and ranks condemn themselves ? What restraints did they lay themselves under ? Where did they tie themselves to hold their abode ? In lonely places, in deserts, in monasteries. They broke with the world ; which yet, without listening to flesh and blood, they thought it their incumbent duty to edify by renouncing its follies, pomps, and vanities. Should we have had a Thais or a Pelagia, so renowned for their penitence, if this had not been an ON PENANCE. 131 invariable maxim in our religion ? How ! Did then, these saints of God deceive themselves ? Are they chargeable with ignorance and extreme folly ? Did they undergo willingly, and to no pur- pose, a most galling yoke ? Had they no tnie knowledge of the ways of God ? Or, were the ways of God revealed only to us ? Alas ! Cliristians, let us rather conclude, that as they walked in the stmight and holy ways of God, we eiToneously follow the most spacious and wide — directly opposite to the state to which penance should lead us. By their example, let us learn not only to refrain from evil, but to remove, with all diligence, the appear- ance of evil ; and to that end, let us not be content with a reve- rential fear of our great Creator, let us learn furthermore to respect the world ; for, sometimes the world, profane as it is, deserves our respect, and never more than when it condemns, is offended at, and ranks among crimes, the appearance of a crime. If in this the world seem a severe censor, let the severity of its censure contri- bute to edify us. If it be partial and unjust, let us turn to advan- tage its partiality and injustice. If it should assail us with taunts, obloquy, insult, and scorn, let us give God thanks that its very malignity serves to make us more A^gilant, more regular, and better Christians. Heaven be praised that, with all its corruption, it hath a spark of zeal left for integrity of life and purity of manners, and that vice and wickedness have not yet prevailed over the minds of men, so as to obtain its sanction and approbation. Thou^-h the world seem delicate on this head, let us not conclude that it is in the •wrong. Let the blame be laid rather at our own door, for that we perversely refused to subscribe to the judgment of the world, though perfectly agreeable to the law of God. Let us respect not only the wise and the strong, but (as the apostle advises) the weak and the imprudent. Let us refrain, like him, not only from that which is criminal and illicit, but from that Avhich to us seems innocent and allowable. Why should we arrogate more libei-ty in our conduct than the great apostle ? In fine, let us beware of all those things that may occasion uncharitableness and rash judgment ; whatever may seem, in ourselves or in others, to authorize or countenance anything sinflil. Thus we shall render our penitence efficacious ; and after retrenching the matter and cause of sin, after repairing its eflTects and consequences, it remains that Ave submit to the remedies against it, the subject of the third and last part. 132 ON PENANCE. Part III. The holy fathers, with reason, have considered sin, especially in cases of long contracted habits, as a dangerous illness, which penance only, and that, too, by administering the most pow- erful remedies, can cure. On this, according to St. Chrysostom, depends the sinner's destiny. A happy destiny, if, inspired with zeal for his oAvn salvation, he is firmly resolved to make use of the remedies prescribed by penance ; an unhappy destiny, if the disgust which they cause, and the repugnance which he feels, should induce him to reject them. For, none but madmen, (continues this father,) whose blind infatuation is more dangerous than their very illness, would refuse to submit to an infalhble cure. We are, therefore, by the law, under two obligations, relatively to two remedies to be taken, in order effectually to destroy sin ; one a preservative — the other a corrective ; by means of which, if we are not absolutely assured of our justification, we have grounds to believe, and a moral certainty, that we are returned into grace and favom' with God. 1st. I am not afraid to affirm, Christians, that all those who have turned their thoughts, with any degree of care and attention, on what by experience they know of themselves, have clear con- ceptions, from time to time, of what was sufficient to guard against sin, and restrain their affections within the bounds of duty. To this 1 defy the most volative mind to refuse assent. How uncol- lected, or inconsiderate, or precipitate, or even blinded soever a sinner may be, he is never so far hurried away but he observes, in the course of his passions, the most irregular, his deviations and relapses, and in the bottom of his heart bears this secret testimony against himself: sin, by such and such precautions, ftu- from having any ascendant over me, might have been counteracted and totally destroyed. Now, beloved brethren, I say, that to take these necessary precautions in the way of the Lord ; to be guided by our particular lights and experience ; to be faithful on this head, and hearken to ourselves ; to neglect nothing that may con- tribute to uphold, direct, and defend us, is a convincing proof of a sincere conversion. Thus, beloved hearers, you have often remarked, that the best preservative against the love of pleasure, is application to business ; that whatever collects and fixes the mind, preserves it without difficulty, or with less difficulty, in a state of innocence ; and that while your days were full, as the propliet speaks, that is, fully and ON THE LOVE OF GOD. 133^ profitably employed, sin found no entrance into your heart. This you well knew : and yet as you are delighted with ease and tran- quillity ; and you indulge the indolence which is grafted in your nature, whatever disturbs or cramps the mind, or restrains the senses, is your utter aversion. In what then consists, with regard to you, the efficacy of penance ? In being constantly upon your guard against yourself; in being employed in something, as em- ployment is the only support of yoiu: weakness ; in being employed in the spirit of religious duty, although you should be influenced by no other motive ; in being employed in the spirit of penitential works, for employment is a penance most pleasing to God : in being employed without evading or diminishing any the least part, how painful or toilsome soever it be, of the employment allotted you by the divine appointment ; in a cheerful willingness to un- dergo the whole burden, though it were still more heavy, though you were in no doubt of being borne down and overwhelmed by it. Thus you are reduced to the happy situation of that ancient soli- tary, Avho was wont to say, as St. Jerom relates : "I have no time to enjoy life, how should I have time to commit sin ?" So far, therefore, from qualifying labour with the name of slavery, be thankful to the Deity, who hath given you such honest and rea- sonable means of fencing against vice, and hath enabled you in your station to find a certain remedy for the conquering of your passions, which idleness and inattention aJAvays quicken, and which nothing but assiduity in labour can deaden. The same I say to you, who know full well, that your frailty exposes you to many relapses ; who know well that which would enable you to curb the vehemence of your passions ; who know that frequent recourse to the sacred tribunal of penance, is a sovereign remedy against every the most violent and importunate attack ; who know, that with the help of this sacrament, you encounter dangers Avith more courage, and adhere to resolutions with more constancy, and that by neglect and slothfulness in this duty, you grow weak and lukewarm : who know, that, in order to proceed steadily in the way of salvation, you should be directed by one who held the place of God, and whose prudent advice might con- firm you in vu'tuc ; who know, that the obligation you lie under of applying and unbosoming yourself to him, is a check upon your levity, and a guard to your inconstancy ; Avho knoAV, in short, that God, in the penitential tribuntd, imd in the hands of his ministers, VOL. II. K 134 ON THE LOVE OF GOD. '■ to speak with the apostle, hath deposited those arms which we ought to put on, and with which, in the day of temptation and conflict, we may stand om* ground and resist the enemy : this you know ; this you have learned by woful experience. Nevertheless, confession is irksome to you, especially if frequent. The injunction laid on you by the minister of the Lord, as your spiritual physician, to present yourself to him from time to time and discover the latent wounds of your soul, is a burdensome law ; a law to which you cannot submit but with great reluctance. If at first you accept the proposed tenns, you speedily recoil, you retract your word, and you shake oflT the yoke. Can I then presume that your penitence was attended with that good faith, that candour and sincerity, which alone would make it valid in the presence of God ? Had this been the case, beloved hearers, you would gladly have been cured in such an exigency, and would have sought a remedy ; and, fully convinced of its utility and necessity, you would yourself, without waiting for orders, have been the first to prescribe it. With joy, and to the letter, you would have fulfilled the condi- tion which the prudent priest, by the rules of his ministry required of you. On the day appointed, he Avould have seen you return to recover new strength. Fidelity and compliance would have been motives not only of duty, but of consolation. And are Ave not influenced every day by things of less moment ? At the return of a disease, the consequences of Avhich you still apprehend, what are you not willing to do and to suffer ? What do you not abstain from ? What regimen so mortifying, what diet so loathsome, which you take not -with strictness and according to prescription ? What is your faith, if, when the salvation of your soul is at stake, you act upon principles directly contrary ? Do yovi reason like a Christian, if you do not for your soul what with care and scrupulosity you do for your body ? 2ndly. I shall now proceed to the second obUgation, and with that shall conclude. To be efficaciously converted, it is not suffi- cient to refrain from sin : sins committed must be expiated by acts of vindictive justice, such as the Lord will one day exert against impenitent sinners. Now this inordination, beloved hearers, is the worst of all, as it renders penance, in most Christians, unprofitable and ineffectual. We use this sacrament, but are not amended, because we are unwilling to exercise punishment upo7i ourselves in proportion to our sins ; and, not to look out for other reasons, we ON THE LOVE OF GOD. 135 persist in iniquity, year after year, because our self-love, an enemy to austerity, begets in us effeminacy, and banishes from our minds the slightest notion of self-controul. If the punishment of sin, I mean voluntary punishment, to which we condemn ourselves, as arbitrators and judges in our own cause, which is properly penitence, or that part of penance Avhich belongs to ourselves : if voluntary punishment were speedily inflicted after the sinful deed ; if such were our zeal, that avc Ibrgave ourselves nothing ; if, as often as we happen to swerve from our duty, we had but the courage to make due compensation by voluntary suffer- ings, I cannot but without hesitation, affirm, that every vice would soon be eradicated, and every passion soon subdued. I mean not by this to insinuate that penitence is a servile virtue, proceeding only from motives of fear. For we may (says St. Augustin) suffer voluntary pains, influenced by love, and a desire of perfection, with a view to moderate our sinful appetites, and to make satisfaction for past offences. And if fear be our induce- ment, it may be a filial fear — a fear arising fi-om motives of charity, by wliich we oblige ourselves, in order to return into favour with God, and pay him, to his greater honour and glory, a tribute of satisfaction, to perform some Avorks of piety and devotion, to prac- tice certain austerities, to retrench certain pleasures, and to forego certam inconveniencies. Accordingly, when the church inflicted, heretofore, canonical penances to every species of sin, she did not mean that the faith- ful should lose the spirit of adoption, which had been conferred on them in the new law, nor to introduce among them the spirit of servility which reigned in the old. Her intention by this severity was, to uphold some, and reclaim others ; to flu-ther in these the designs of conversion, and to maintain in those a holy perseverance. Such were her views : and her conduct in this, by the divine assistance, had so good an effect, that numberless Christians preserved to the end their baptismal innocence ; and the pe- nitence and sorrow of those who had lost it, were not to be questioned, Avhen for one mortal sin they fasted whole years, and without opposition submitted to laborious and mortifyino- tasks. Then innocence flourished, and penance was exem- plary, because sin was punished. But now we come off, and desire to come off, at an easier rate. And Avhat is the conse- quence ? That we commit sin the more fi-eely, remain in it the k2 136 ON THE LOVE OF GOD. more quietly, repent of it the more slightly, discontinue it the more rarely ; and that our penance is mostly of none effect, or much to be suspected, and at best doubtful. These penalties, prescribed by the church, in course of time were greatly moderated. Hence an inundation of vice commenced ; hence discipline relaxed ; hence Christianity wore another aspect. So true it is, that this assistance is needful for the sinner ; and that while left to himself and to his own discretion, or rather pusillanimity, he cannot be deemed to be thoroughly reformed. He seeks his ease, humours his disposition, and indulges the dictates of self-love. Let Tis, therefore, do now, beloved Christians, what the church did in former ages. Let us adopt the same sentiments, enter into the same spirit, conform to the same practices. Let us not forget, that if she hath abated of her rigour in some points, she meant not to encroach upon God's prerogative, in which she neither could nor would admit of relaxation ; and, that if she hath consented to change regulations established by herself, she never pretended to what was not her province ; namely, to mitigate the essential obli- gation of making satisfaction to an offended Deity. Whence we may conclude, that this condescension, rightly understood, can giv^ no colour to our irresolution, as it is true to say, that the more we spare ourselves, the less God will spare us ; the less we punish ourselves, the more he will chastise us. For, God's pre- rogative will always subsist, and be always the same. Persuaded, therefore, that sin must be punished either in the present world or in the world to come, either by the justice of God or by the penitence of man, let us not wait till God himself shall inflict due punish- ment. Let us take care to prevent the rigour of his justice by the rigour of our penitence. Inflamed with zeal, let us side with the Almighty against ourselves, and avenge his cause at our own expense. If those who, by Almighty God's appointment, or by our own choice, are our spiritual directors, should be too indulgent, let us make amends (according to a maxim laid down by St. Bernard) for their indulgence by our own severity. If they be deficient in rigour or exactness, let us make up the deficiency for our owa sakes, as none but ourselves are personally concerned, and it be- hoves us, not others, to mind our o-vvn interest. Let us ever apply to our spiritual evils, the evils of our soul, specific remedies ; and let us punish sins of various kinds by various means : licentious ON COMMUNION. 137 conversation, by retiring from the world ; fix3cdom of speech and indiscretion of the tongue, by silence ; luxury, by moderation in dress and retinue ; unlawful pleasures, by forbearing fi-om lawful ones : " Who knoweth but he will return and forgive ?" Joel ii. Who knows but the God of mercy will return to us ? Or, rather, who can doubt it, after the authentic promise he hath given us ? In a word, beloved hearers, let us relinquish the matter and cause of sin, let us repair the consequences and effects of sin, let us sub- mit, cost what it will, to the remedies for sin ; by doing which, and by no other means, we shall return into the way of salvation and glory. SEEMON XXIII. ON COMMUNION. For the Third Sunday after Epipliany, *' Jesus saith unto him : I ivill come and heal him. " And the centurion ansioered and said: Lord, I am not worthy that thou shouldest come under my roof" Matt. viii. In this passage. Christians, we see a kind of contest between Christ and the centurion ; but in this contest, which seems the most to claim our admiration — the charity of a God, or the humi- lity of a pagan ? I may safely say, that there never was strife more holy, or more proper for instruction and edification. Our Saviour, by an impulse of benificent charity is for going in person into the house of the centurion, and the centm'ion accounts himself unworthy of that honour. The only begotten Son of God, whose mercy is unhmited, assures him that he will come, and by his pre- sence will cure his paralytic servant : " I will come and heal liim ;" but the centurion, confused at so signal a favour, protests openly that he is unworthy of it, and acknowledges his unworthiness : *' Lord, I am not worthy." Be pleased to take notice. This is a Gentile, to whom om* blessed Saviom*, in quality of Messiah, 138 ON COMMUNION. heath not been as yet announced or revealed, as he hath been to the Jews ; and, notwithstanding that, Gentile as he is, he is already prepossessed with so high an opinion of, and so profound a respect for the Messiah who accosts him, that he cannot consent to receive his visit. A humility (says St. Augustin) which arose from a lively and ardent faith ; and which, by an operation of our Ke- deenier's grace, transformed, on this spot, this Gentile not only into a veritable Israelite, but a perfect Christian. A humility with which Jesus Christ was well pleased, which he very much set by, and which he honoured with commendations ; but to which, not- withstanding, it may truly be said that he paid no regard, whereas on the contrary, upon that very account, he insisted upon going into the centurion's house. Here let us stop : and to profit, pursuant to the views of God, by so great an example, let us bring this gospel narrative home to our own case. For, that which passed (as St. Chrysostom remarks) between Christ and the centurion, is every day repeated between Christ and us. My meaning is, that this same Saviour, by insti- tuting the eucharist, hath left us a sacrament by which he wills to impart himself to us ; and, God as he is, to dwell corporally between our breasts ; a sacrament, by which he visits us in person, with a view to heal our spiritual infirmities. As often, therefore, as we prepare to receive him in this adorable mystery, he still says to us with as much truth as he said heretofore : " I will come and heal ;" hoAV low soever you may be reduced, if, by a sincere acknowledg- ment of our weakness, we answer like the centurion : no, my Lord, I am not Avorthy that you should come to me and enter into my breast. For, these are the venerable words which the church puts into our mouths, when this God of glory, hidden under the form of the elementary species, is ready to take up his abode in our breasts : " Lord, I am not worthy." Efficacious words, which (according to the words of St. Augustin) have the virtue to operate in a Christian soul a miracle quite contrary to that which they signify : for when we pronounce them, they cancel the un wor- thiness we attribute to ourselves, and give us, -with regard to Christ and his sacrament, a fund of merit which Ave should not be able to acquire without them. Words, which by a Avonderful operation of grace, direct our steps to the term from which they seemingly withhold us, as according to the doctrine of all the fathers, the chief, and indeed essential disposition for worthily receiving the ON COMMUNION. 139 body of Christ is, to Wicve and confess ourselves unworthy of it. Words, in fine, which point out our humility to the Son of God, Avitliout the least obstructing his charity ; and which, far from making him keep away from us, serves as an attractive to make him come to us. But, beloved hearers, it so falls out, that often in applying these words to ourselves, we strain the sense of them beyond the intention of our blessed Saviour ; and, in order to square them to our o^vn fancy, we run the hazard of directly counteracting the views of God. In this sacrament, Christ Jesus seeks us, and we withdraw from him. Through excess of love, he wishes to honour us with his holy visits and we will not receive them. He asks to take up his abode in our hearts, and we under specious, nay, religious pretexts refuse him admittance : for, to exculpate ourselves upon this refusal, we plead our unworthiness ; and we say, problably In a different spirit from that of the centurion, "Lord, I am not worthy." As this is the most obvious and common excuse, it is incumbent on me to con- sider It particularly, not absolutely with a view to oppose and decry it, nor yet to prove its rectitude, but to examine its nature, which will give me an opportunity of delivering the most solid and important doctrines respecting the practice and use of communion. To abstain from communion under colour of unworthiness, Is an excuse, Christians, according to the different dispositions and qualities of those who allege it, susceptible of very different inter- pretations ; and my design, of which this is a succinct notion. Is to lay these different Interpretations before you, that you may enter into the nature of this excuse, and of the good or bad consequences dcducible from It. For there are among Christians two sorts of people who set out on tliis principle, and may say with the centu- rion, Lord, I am not worthy that thou shouldest enter into my breast ; the righteous, who live in the observance and practice of the law of God, and sinners, who arc overwhelmed in the vices and follies of a criminal life. In regard to the righteous it can hardly be doubted, that they are induced by the feelings of an humble heart to speak in that manner. But to know to what length this humility should be carried, and whether it be reason- able that it should make them keep away from Jesus Christ and his sacrament : to know whether the privation of the blessed cucharist, for a righteous soul, may be deemed an ordinary exer- 140 ON COMMUNION. cise of penance ; whether penance of this kind be conformable to the intentions of the Son of God ; whether it accords with the end and institution of this mystery ; whether it corresponds with the standing usage of the earliest times of the Christian religion ; whether it be received and approved by the church in later ages ; whether it be countenanced by the ancient fathers, and whether it may be profitable ; in a word, whether Jesus Christ, as contained in the divine sacrament of his body, esteems himself honoured, when the righteous, instead of approaching him, withdraw from him, and whether it be rendering him true respect, as he is the Bread of Life, to be contented only with reverencing and adoring him, and not corporally receiving him, are questions, beloved hearers, of which, for sundry and weighty reasons, general and particular, I shall wave the discussion, leaving them to your own particular examination. Besides, as it would be no easy matter to say anything new upon this topic, perhaps it might not do so much good, as may, with good reason, be hoped for from a discourse solely consecrated to the edification of your souls. I shall, therefore, speak only of those sinners, who may tell Jesus Christ vnth much more reason than did St. Peter : " Depart from me, because I am a sinful man." Luke v. These I divide into three classes. The first are sincere sinners ; the second, blind sinners ; and the last, hypocritical sinners. Sincere sinners behave with candour in the presence of God, and are not deceived. Blind sinners are totally ignorant of their own condition, and impose upon themselves. In fine, hypocritical and dissembling sinners cover their libertinism with a veil of piety, and make it their business to deceive others. The first have rehgion, and are actuated by the spirit of it. The second, although they have some religion, have a wrong notion that they are actuated by the spirit of it. The last, although they would seem to be actuated by the spirit of religion, have in reality no religion at all. Now these three kinds of sinners may hold the language we find the centurion in the gospel held : " Lord, 1 am not worthy," and decline com- municating on account of unworthiness. But, although they all of them assert it equally, they are not all of them equally to be credited. For, to lay still moi'e open the plan of my discourse : in the first, that is, in sincere sinners, this excuse is a reason ; in the second, that is, in blind sinners, this excuse is a pretext ; and ON COMMUNION. 141 in tlie last, that is, in hypocritical and libertine einners, this excuse is an abuse, and even a scandal. And this is now what I under- take to demonstrate. But I proceed farther : for, three things I add to this, which will put the characters of these three sinners in a clear point of view, and must needs convey material instruction. First : unworthiness is a reason for the sincere sinner to abstain from communion ; and I hold that this reason ought farther to be explained. Secondly: unworthiness is a pretext for the blind sinner to abstain from communion ; and to remove this pretext is of the utmost consequence. Thirdly : unworthiness is an abuse and scandal in the hypocri- tical sinner, and consequently a reason to abstain from commu- nion ; and my duty obliges me to impugn and bear down this abuse and scandal. Part I, That my first position may appear in as clear a light as possible, I must premise. Christians, that I speak of a sinner, who preserves in the midst of his evil courses a fund of religion ; who behaves toward God at least with openness and unfeigned sincerity ; who acknowledges the unhappy state of his conscience ; confesses his sin, bewails it Avith sighs, but as yet is not quite dis- posed to relinquish it. To abstain in that case from the sacred table, because he is unworthy, is a well-founded reason, I own, for the sinner, as the doctrine of faith makes it clear and evident, that so long as his sin is not obliterated, he cannot approach the divine sacrament, Avithout being involved in the guilt of sacrilege. But, beloved hearers, I say that this reason should farther be elucidated, and this elucidation consists in showing you that he must not stop there : I mean, that he must not so abstain from communion, on account of unworthiness, as to think he hath fully performed his duty, by declining to partake of this sacred mystery ; but that he must lay do^vn another principle, equally essential, and equally in- contestable : I mean, he must know the obligation he is under of quitting forthwith his state of unworthiness in order to be admitted to the holy repast. So that communion itself becomes a pressing motive, which induces him to the necessity of working his conver- sion, and obliges hlra to use his utmost endeavours, by a speedy repentance, to procure admission to the adorable sacrament, from which his sinful state withholds him. This is the disposition, if he knows his duty, in which it is his boundcn duty to be ; and, 142 ON COMMUNION. without which, I maintain that there is nothing solid in his con- duct. For, beloved Christians, the great maxim on which is hinged the whole conduct of a sinner, in regard to communion is, never to separate these two points — two inviolable rules in our holy religion: one, that Jesus Christ lays his commands on us to eat his flesh ; the other, that he puts us under a strict prohibition of eating it unworthily : one, that the flesh of this God-man is the food of our souls ; the other, that this food, though wholesome in itself, is poi- son for those who presume to take it in the state of sin : one, that as it is not possible to support the natural life without the help of ahments, so it is not possible to support the supernatural life of grace, without the holy eucharist ; the other, that as aliments in a diseased body, far from supplying it with strength and nomisli- ment, weaken it, and destroy the source of life ; so the eucharist is death to those who receive it without purifying their heart. If the sinner adheres to one of these points, without joining the other, he assuredly goes astray, and is lost for ever ; but if he unites them, he enters directly into the way of God. Hear how he reasons : Christ Jesus forbids me to eat his flesh, and keeps me at a dis- tance, so long as my heart is SAvayed by sin : it is, therefore, my duty to beware of eating it in my present state. But he tells me that if I eat it not, I neither have, nor can have, the supernatural life in which consist the sanctification and happiness of the righ- teous man ; I am therefore obliged, cost what it will, to quit my present sinful state, in order to render myself capable of eating it. I cannot Avithdraw from the obedience due to both the one and the other of these commandments ; to the former for Christ's sake, to the latter for my own. If I receive communion unworthily, I pro- fane the body of the Lord ; and thus I must take care of the interests of Christ. If I do not receive communion at all, I murder my soul, by depriving her of that which alone could nourish her and keep her in union and co-operation with grace ; and thus I must secure my own interests. If, remaining a sinner, I partici- pate of the eucharist, I participate of it to my own condemnation ; but if I do not participate of it, I shall certainly perish. There remains, therefore, but one alternative; to change my life, to renounce my sin, to return into the grace and favor of God, to fit myself for eating this bread of life, m order that it may become for me a life-giving bread. For by that means, I shall comply Avith ON COMMUNION. H3 my duty Loth In what concerns the honour of Jesua, and my own advantage. Thus shall I fulfil what God requu-es, which is, that I eat, and that I hvc by eating this bread with profit. Thus, I say, the sinner will reason ; and this way of reasoning will be the deci- sive and infallible cause of his conversion. Whereas, if he only minds his unworthiness, he will spend his days in a circle of crimes, not takinor so much as one resolution relative to salvation, or one step in the view of returning with speed to God. Now this piinciple, beloved Christians, which every sinner should lay do-wn for liimself, is that which the ministers of the gospel should adopt in delivering instruction upon this topic. Of the two precepts, which I have just been explaining, they should never inculcate one, without remonstrating, at the same time, the neces- sity of the other. The reason is this : one without the other is at best imserviceable, perhaps prejudicial. For if you perpetually represent to a sinner the hon-ible danger of an unworthy commu- nion, without ever mentioning the indispensable necessity of communicating worthily, the consequence is, that he will never communicate ; which is directly contrary to the express command of our Saviour, who says: " Unless ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, ye shall have no life in you." John vi. But if, on the other hand, you mention only the necessity of communicating, without ever making him apprehend the danger of an unworthy commu- nion, you put hun in the way of making many imperfect, nay, sacri- legious communions, in direct opposition to St. Paul's words: " Let a man prove himself." 1 Cor. xi. And this, beloved hearers, (give me leave in this place to make a natural reflection, in which I am sm'C you will join issue with me,) this hath been the cause of all the evils which the diversity of opinions hath produced in all ages, of the Christian era, as it gave too often contrariant biases to the minds of men concerning the use of the divine sacrament. The zeal of some was confined to such methods of intimidation as might keep the sinner from the sacred mysteries ; and they repeat to him over and over again these terrible words : " He that eateth unwor- thily, eateth danmation to himself," (1 Cor. xi.) which tended only to ins})ire him Avith a horror of an unworthy communion. Others exerted their Avhole powers in exhorting him to receive the divine food ; and they invited him incessantly by that comfortable pro- mise of our Saviour: " He that eateth this bread shall live for ever;" (John vi. ;) by which they seemed only to aim at raismg in him 144 ON COMMUNION. an efficacious desire of holy commuiuon. They never were per- fectly agreed in their manner of carrying Christ's design into exe- cution. Had they gone hand in hand, and joined in sentiment, very great advantage would have accrued to the church from so admirable a coalition, inasmuch as it would have been a certain means of sanctifying sinners. But as they disagreed, and as each side was wedded to their own opinion, neither sinners nor the church could receive the advantage which God intended. For they who ever and anon rung in the ears of their hearers the ana- thematical curse pronounced by St. Paul against the abuse of com- munion, without mentioning what might serve as a motive for receiving that sacrament, by little and little abolished the use of it, and made the guests withdraw from the bridegroom's table. But they, likewise, who endeavoured only to give a high idea of the fruits of communion, and the tendency of whose speeches was solely to draw a great number of guests to the table of our Saviour, ran a mighty hazard (like the servants in the parable) of convening indifferently the good and the bad. What was said on both sides might have been very true ; and yet on neither side did they say enough to produce the eiffect of the sacrament of Christ Jesus, because they said on neither side but half of that which ought to have been said. Upon this the holy bishop of Geneva judiciously remarks, that the whole should have been said ; and that the invi- tation of these should have been brought in conjunction Avith the menaces of those. The sinner should be told : be afraid of approaching this holy table, and be afraid of not approaching it. Be afraid of approaching it, if you are not robed in the nuptial gar- ment — which is divine grace ; and be afraid of not approaching it, because none but the enemies of God are excluded. The food which is offered you is mortal for you, if you discern it not justly by the spirit of faith ; but know, moreover, that it is a wholesome food, without which Christ Jesus will not abide in you, nor will you in him. Wherefore, receive this food with trembling ; for to receive it with trembling is one of the necessary dispositions in receiving it. But tremble still more if you do not receive it, because you will not be prevailed upon to receive it with the neces- sary preparation. Thus they should have spoken. And indeed, Christians, all the fathers of the church, when they opened their minds upon the same subject held the same language. As those great men were certainly actuated by the Spirit of God, ON COMMUNION. 145 they were far from separating those two things, which they knew full well our Saviour intended should never be separated. St. Chrysostom bids us examine and judge ourselves, lest in partici- pating of Christ's body, we draw down upon our heads coals of living fire — that is, the indignation and vengeance of God. Thus he expressed himself; and the energy of his words was capable to inspire the faithful who heard him with dread and horror. But this he immediately softens by telling them : now this I say not with intent to deter you from partaking of it — God forbid I but that you may partake of it with proper dispositions, and according to the sacred rules prescribed by the law of God. For, (continues he,) as by partaking of it, without due consideration, we rashly expose ourselves to be lost for ever ; so the not partaking of it is the ruin and death of the Christian man. I observe (says St. Augustin) that some among you decline communicating from a con- sciousness of great and unrepented sins ; but I solemnly declare to them — (an important decision this of that father) — that if they stop there, and proceed not to action, they increase the weight and number of their sins, by sinning anew, and depriving them- selves of the most necessary and most sovereign remedy. There- fore, my brethren, (concludes he,) I conjure you, if any of you judge yourselves unworthy of communion, to render yourselves worthy with all expedition; because whoever is unworthy of this divine sacrament is unworthy of God. Thus spoke the fathers. Now what they said in general and absolute terms, is still more weighty, when considered relatively to that holy time, in which the faithful are obliged by the express and particular command of Christ himself, determined by the church, to receive communion ; it is the Easter solemnity, which cannot be celebrated but by the manducation of the Lamb, Clu-ist Jesus. For, on that occasion, to threaten the sinner with the ^v^ath of God if he presume to communicate in a sinful state, and not to threaten him with the same wrath if he do not relinquish his sinful state, in oi'der to satisfy this commandment, " Unless you eat," would be to instruct him but by halves, and to afford liim an opportunity of fomenting his impenitence. He must be made to know the order of the Master — I mean the great Master, by telling him what Christ, by two of his disciples, sent to tell the man whose house he made choice of wherein to celebrate the Feast of the Pass- over : " The master saith, I will keep the Passover at thy house." 146 ON COMMUNION. Matt. xxvi. He must be told : brother, it is within yourself that the mystery of the Passover must be fulfilled, as the time approaches in which Jesus Christ, who is the true Passover, desires to be received by you in the adorable eucharist. True it is, you are not in readiness ; but for that very reason it is, that we declai-e it to you, to the intent you may prepare yourself seriously, speedily, and efficaciously. For there is, in this case, no mean, no tempera- ture betAveen the two extremes. Remaining in sin, you cannot avoid either profaning or deserting the sacrament of Christ ; pro- faning it, if you presume to eat this Passover, without preparing for it by a sincere conversion ; deserting it, if for want of prepara- tion and conversion, you are not in a condition requisite to eat it. To think it not strictly agi-eeable to propriety that you should be reduced to this dilemma, were to arraign the conduct of the church, which is your mother, and of Christ, who is your God j and to say that this dilemma may lead you into excesses, were to endeavour to clear yourself by your very excesses, which consist in the abuse of the most holy things. Be that as it may, this is the penalty by which the church hath, in virtue of her power of binding and unbinding, a canonical right to punish your disobedience ; namely, to cut you off from her communion as a scandalous member, when through hardness of heart, or an inveterate attachment to the object of your passion, you withdraw from the communion of the body Christ Jesus. By this, however, she meant not to entangle you in difficulties and perplexities, or expose you to the danger of add- ing sin to sin ; but, like a zealous mother, would lay on you an obligation of making use of what is most salutary and sacred in the Christian religion. To this end, you must break your bands, and quit for ever your criminal engagements. But let it not be for- gotten, that this is the object to which the precept of communion tends. You must pull out the eye that gives you scandal ; that is, you must break off those intercourses which are the scandal of your life. But herein, you should admire the precept of commu- nion, which forces you, as it were, to do that which is pleasing in the sight of God. But what were the views of the church in enacting these rigor- ous laws against obdurate sinners, disobedient to her mandates, and neglectful of solemnizinsj the Paschal Feast ? Slie meant to lay them under a strict obligation, and compel them by necessity. And, whereas, the Holy Ghost declares the legality of such pro- ON COMMUNION. 147 ceeding in express terms, " compel them to come in ;" (Luke xiv. ;) she chooses to make use of compulsive methods, that, purified by penance, they may deserve admittance to the table of our Lord. These were the holy methods she used in former times, and this was the violence she exerted against that kind of sinners. For, whatever she deemed of their sinful practices, being Christians and her children, their religion and faith gave her room to hope, that they would never appear at the sacred table, without previous pre- paration. Accordingly, being affected themselves, though sinners, with a religious respect and profound veneration for the holy sacra- ment, they did, to receive it, that which otherwise they would never have done ; I mean, they Avere totally changed and reformed, to wliicli they would never have been induced by any other motive whatever. This obhgation, by which they were compelled to eat the flesh of a God, and the horror they conceived of unworthily eating it, was what converted them — what tore from their hearts the most predominant passions, and what made them take all the necessaiy measures, in order to return into favour with God. You object that this method occasions sacrileges ; and I answer, that there is nothing, how sacred soever, which may not be profaned by the wickedness of man ; and yet that our Saviour commands, under pain of eternal reprobation, every one of the faithful, without exception, to eat his flesh ; and that the church, liis spouse, would not have acted conformable to his intention, if, at the same time that she pubhshes to the world St. Paul's anathema against unwor- thy communion, she did not lay them under the happy necessity of receiving communion holily and profitably. And here, beloved hearers, are two rocks against which we are usually dashed in these times by the spirit of the world. Pi'ovided a sinner be induced to perform, to outward appearance, the duty of a Christian, and to approach the sanctuaiy, we think much is done. Upon no other gTounds we extol his religion — we make no doubt that he is fully converted, and are pleased -with the thoughts of his perseverance : this is the first rock. But, on the other side, provided he be made (so long as he remains in his sinful habit) to beware of communicating, we think all is done ; and if this sinner, confessing his unworthiness, keeps away from the altar, we are satisfied as though he had fulfilled all justice. And thus he is suffered to range in an endless round of folHes, and to waste his thoughtless days in vice. It would seem as if his not receiving 148 ON COMMUNION. communion was a cover for the rest, and he then was allowed to live with impunity, and after the corrupt desires of his heart. From the former of these two abuses, it follows that there are, among those who receive communion, many weak, sluggish Chris- tians ; or to use the great apostle's expression, there are many who sleep the sleep of death : "For this cause, there are many weak and sickly among you, and many sleep." 1 Cor. xi. But of the latter, what is the consequence ? That among those who with- draw from communion, there are innumerable multitudes who lead scandalous lives, and who claim to themselves the infamous privi- lege of giving to the church no mark of their Christianity, as the mark by which we are essentially distinguished, in quality of Chris- tians, is (according to St. Paul) the participation of the body of Jesus Christ. From this decay of Christian observances — nay, from this prescription to live at large, we are scarce any longer sm-prised to see that worldlings are notoriously kno^vn to be involved, as it were, in spontaneous excommunication ; and that those holy canons, those sacred laws by which such disorders were directed to be pun- ished, are no more — or seem to be no more in force. A decay, which plunges the true pastors of God's church into agonies of sorrow, beino- witnesses to the loss of so many souls. And all tliis, because such sinners are not sufficiently instnicted in their duty — because they are not made to know the whole extent of it ; because they are taught only to avoid one scandal by another ; the scandal of a bad communion by the scandal of impenitence, or the scandal of impenitence by the scandal of a bad communion ; instead of being made to understand — that it is not sufficient barely to retrench either the one or the other, but that they must avoid both the one and the other. For, O my God, your holy sacrament was instituted equally for sinners and the righteous. Not, indeed, for impenitent, but con- verted sinners — changed, reformed, sanctified sinners. While you tarried upon earth, O adorable Saviour, you disdained not to eat at the table of sinners ; and now, from a very different motive, but throuo-h the same spirit, you admit penitent sinners to your table. And as, heretofore, you ate at the table of sinners, converted by your holy grace much more willingly than at the table of the proud and haughty Pharisees ; so I may say for the comfort of my audi- ence and myself, that there are no Christians more favourably received by you than converted sinners — sinners who renounce ON COMMUNION. 14^ their evil practices, in order to come to you. But this, as I said, is to be understood only of those sinners who act with openness and a 'candid mind. For if they be worldlings, who shut their eyes against their o^vn failings and impose upOn themselves, the sup- posed rfe'spect which they allege for withdrawing from the sacra- ment of Christ is no longer a reason that requires explanation, but a pretext — which I am to remove in the second part. Part II. There is nothing more subtile than the spirit of the world in leading us to its end, nor more artful in giving to things whatever colour and form it pleases when the point is to dazzle and to warp the judgment in the ways of God. For then it pro- poses every specious motive ; and not unfrequently we let ourselves be ensnared insomuch, that we are fully persuaded and believe that Ave honour God by keeping away from him. Now this is the case "with those other sinners of whom I am at present about to speak : they flatter themselves that they want not religion, nay, that they are influenced by the spirit of religion, yet are much mistaken ; they deviate widely from the straight and simple path of truth, and their humility is, in fact, a gross error. My meaning is this : they say,- nay think that it is out of respect they keep from com- munion, because they acknowledge in the presence of God that they are unworthy of it. But I shall show them, first, that it is a vain respect : secondly, that considering it in the manner they apply it, and in all its circumstances, it is a false respect : finally, that it hath no conformity with that respect which true Christians have always shown whenever they separated (according to the rules and spirit of the church) from the sacrament of Christ. Three important reflections these, by which I undertake, net to put them to confusion but to confound, in their persons, the spirit of the world — 1;hat spirit which blinds them, which, to bring them to tlie precipice and work their destruction, makes a glimmer of devotion, a false glimmer, play before their eyes even in their indevotion. 1st. It is a vain respect, and thus I prove the assertion. For, what js understood by a vain respect ? What operates nothing ; what haith no consequence ; what answers no purpose ; what tends to no end ; what doth nothing to render the Christian more worthy of Christ Jesus and his sacrament ; what leaves the sinner in the same imperfections ; what makes him neither more regular noi* more fervent, nor more holy ; in a word, what the only solid proof of is — to abstain from comraimion. Now such is the respect of VOL. II. L 150 ON COMMUNION- that kind of sinners to whom I address this second instruction ; and if pride Avill permit tliem to own their weakness, they will join issue with me. And, indeed, if the respect which they have, or believe they have for the Son of God were the real motive that withheld them from communion, it would, by dint of instigation, and by frequent impressions induce them to undertake sometliing more ; and if it were ever so little effectual, they would give some sign, by their outward demeanour, that they were affected with it. Noav this they do not in any shape. For, to what would this motive — to what would this sentiment of respect induce them ? To withdraw from the world, as (by their own confession) it is the love of the world that renders them unworthy of the sacred banquet. Affected with their un worthiness, and OAvning that it arose from the unto- ward passion they entertained for the world — ^for the false, the fleeting joys of the world ; for the unchristian and dangerous diver- sions of the world ; for the intrigues, the vanity, the luxury of the world — what would they do ? They would wean their affections from those diversions, those pleasures — ^that luxury, that vanity — those intrigues ; and, by offering this perfect sacrifice to Christ, from unworthy sinners would be Christians Avorthy to partake of his flesh. These are the testimonies of respect which they Avould give him, and AA^hich it is incumbent on them to give him. Nothing however, of all this is done ; and to judge by their actions, they seem to have no disposition that Avay. They themselves, if I were to appeal to their own consciences, would frankly confess that they are far from it. It is, therefore, a very mistaken notion, that this respect affects them as much as they would make us believe. It is not, therefore, this respect that keeps them aAvay from the divine mysteries. What then ? I have said it, and I say it again — an obstinate attach- ment to the Avorld, and all that is called the world. They belong to the world, they are part of the world ; and that Avorld which God reprobates finds no relish for the things of God. They love the Avorld more than Christ — and therefore, they relinquish Christ for the world. This outAvard respect is a veil in Avhich their self-love glories ; but it is, at bottom, the world that possesses their A^ery souls, and inspires into them a coolness, an indifference, or to speak more properly, a disgust of communion. And this is what our Saviour himself Avould give us to under- ON COMMUNION. 151 stand, in the parable, by the guests who neglected to come to the feast because other cares had wholly engrossed theu' thoughts and affections. There is, however, (St. Augustin observes,) this remarkable difference ; that the guests in the parable sincerely confessed the reasons which induced them to keep away ; whereas the worldlings, of whom I speak, affect to know not, nay, to hide from themselves the cause of their disorder. They always allege this weak pretext — that as they are unworthy to receive commu- nion they cannot do better than to refrain from it ; and accordingly they harbour a secret complacency, as though they honoured Christ Jesus thereby, and Clii'ist Jesus would, one day, load them with rewards for abandoning his altars in order to enjoy the pleasures of the world -with more ease and gi-eater liberty. For their infa- tuation, beloved hearers, rises to that height ; and to convince them (says St. Chrysostom) — this seems unanswerable — to con- vince them that this supposed respect, so far as it regards them, is a pretext, and no reason, though they communicate but rarely they do not communicate the more worthily. That is, when they do communicate, they do not prepare themselves for it the more ; they search not their hearts with more care ; they do not retire the more from the world ; and, if the expression be not too bold, they are at no more charge for Christ's reception. By the most falla- cious of all maxims they flatter themselves, that to communicate seldom, without anything else, will stand them in lieu of all merit ; and by an evident error, Avhich they do not discern, they measure the whole respect which they render to this divine mystery, not by gi'cater attention to themselves, not by greater application to their duty, not by greater exactness and regularity, but by the interval — the space which elapses between one communion and another. An infallible sign (subjoins St. Chrysostom) that they are not influenced either by humility or respect, but are seduced by the delusions and spirit of the world. Now I say, Christians, that to remove this pretext is of the utmost importance ; not by facilitating communion to them, nor by prompting them to it, while they walk in tlic paths of worldly folly. I am Avell aware how much the dignity of this sacrament requires of the faithful ; and wo is me, if, in tlie greatest and most holy of all Christian actions, and in the disposition requisite to the duly performing of it, I should ever countenance the slightest abatement. But what I understand by the removing of this pre- L 2 152 ON COMMUNION. text is, that they ought to be made to speak to the purpose, fiTkl not to say : I refrain from receiving the body of Christ, because 1 hold it in profound respect ; but, I refrain fronii receiving it because I lead a debauched life, and will not submit to the sacred laws which religion prescribes in order to receive it. I refrain from receiving it because I lead a dissipated life, and my whole thoughts arc taken up with nothing but the world and my pleasures. I refrain from receiving it because I lead a pusillanimous life, and have not the courage to do anything or undertake anything for the salvation of my soul. I refrain from receiving it because I attend to my temporal affairs with excessive eagerness, Avhicli drains my heart of spiritual unction and hardens it in regard to the thinga of God. I refrain from receiving it, because I am unwilling to take up a resolution of mortifying my senses and offering my incli- nations the least violence. I refrain from receiving it, because I would live in mental emancipation, independent of submission, rule and order, and after the capriciousness of my own humour. To oblige the worldling to agree to all this, and to show him forthwith the irregidarity of his conduct, and the flagrant injury done to our Saviour by thus neglecting his adorable sacrament — to make him understand that he doth not an honour but an outrage to God ; to make him apprehend that he draAvs upon himself that terrible curse with which our Saviour concludes the parable i " For, I say unto you, that none of those men who were bidden shall taste ray supper;" (Luke xiv. ;) to convince him of all this were the surest means to dispel the dangerous infatuating cloud that darkens his understanding and holds his mind in jxirpetual delusion. Hoav often, Christians, hath this prediction of the Saviour of men, though minatory only, been fulfilled to the letter ! And how many Christians, for having abandoned communion in the course of life, have been deprived of it, by a secret judgment of the heavenly ruler, at the hour of death ! But to proceed : 2ndly. Not only it is a vain, but a false respect. The reason is, that it is not accompanied vai\i the two conditions essential to it : one, a piercing sorrow for being separated from the body of Christ ; the other, a sincere desire of approaching it : conditions insepara- ble from true respect, but of which the worldling, if he entei-s but a little into himself, will find that his heart is wholly destitute. A piercing sorrow for being separated from the body of Christ ; for if I honour him as much as I ought to do, and have that respectful ON COiMMUNION. 153 attachment to him, of which I flatter myself with the possession, I ought to look upon it as my supreme good to be united with him in the present life. I say united, especially by a sacrament which he hath himself instituted to keep up a holy and ineflfable union between him and me. Whence it follows, that by the same rule, I ought to look upon it as my sovereign evil to be separated from this adorable sacrament, of which the participation is a pledge, or rather an anticijmtion of my beatitude. And this St. Chrysostom understood perfectly, when, speak- ing of communion, he said to his audience : " Let your only grief be, that you are deprived of this food," this heavenly food, the flesh of Christ Jesus. Your only gi-ief : for in comjjarison with this, what are all the other causes of affliction ? If, then, I really resjjeet this sacrament in the degree it is respectable, and I would be thought to respect it, nothing should be more painful or afflicting to me than to see myself deprived of this divine nourish- ment. And, indeed, it ought to create in my heart greater grief than all the losses and crosses in the world. This consideration, " I am separated from my God," if I believe the revealed truths of i'eligion, ought to fill my soul with greater bitterness, and pierce it with sharper stings of sorrow, than the son of Isaac felt when excluded from parental benediction ; and thereby I enter, in a Christian manner, into the spirit and meaning of St. Chrysostom's words : " Let your ordy grief be, that you are deprived of this food." But still more piercing ought my grief to be if I have room to attribute the separation to myself — a separation arising fi"om my own infidelity, from my obstinate attachment to a shameful object that holds me captive, from my disinclination to make to Christ the sacrifice he expects : but what an increase of heart-anguish, if I rightly discern the whole complication of evils caused by so woful a sepai-ation ! When the church, exerting the severity of her dis- cipline on the primitive Christians, deprived them for a time of the sacred banquet, what did they do, and what were their feelings ? The fathers informs us, that their spirits sunk, that they fell into melancholy, that they sighed, that they moaned, that they shed floods of tears, that they looked ujwn their state as a temporary reprobation. Thus, though deprived of communication with him, they retained a real respect for Christ Jesus. But have those worldlings, of whom I speak, ever felt this Christian and religious 154 ON COMMUNION. sorrow ? I appeal for testimony to their own hearts, and call themselves to witness. Forbidden to communicate, with what tranquillity do they bear the fbrbiddance ? With what indolent ease do they see themselves separated from the God of their salva- tion ? With what insensibility do they bring themselves not only to feel no regret at it, but to find relief by it ? Communion in the course of a worldly life is a heavy burden, and they rid them- selves of it. It checks, or interrupts their vain pleasures, and they abandon it, to enjoy them without check or interruption. In order to communicate, certain measures must be kept and restraints put up with ; but they find it more convenient to keep away from it, and communicate no more. With these dispositions shall they persuade me that they entertain a true respect for Christ Jesus and his sacrament ? And although they should persist in their assevei'ations, should I not be at liberty to reject their words as clashing vnth. truth and right reason ? Again, it is a false respect, because it carries not "with it a desu'e of communion. This, I presume, will appear in the sequel. For, beloved Christians, the respect for Christ Jesus, which I am bound to have, may induce me for a time to withdraw from communion, but will never extinguish, no nor diminish, if it be real and true, my desire of communion. So far from it, the more I find myself unworthy to communicate, with the greater ardour I ought in one sense to desbe to communicate : for, this desire is e^^ddently a means of repairing my unworthiness. And, in effect, it is through this desire that I return to Christ Jesus, and it is in virtue of it that I endeavour to come nearer and nearer to him. It is through this desire, that, to the same intent, I seek every means, surmount every obstacle, and am faithful in executing every resolution. So long as I am actuated by this desire, the seeds of life are still within me and I am equal to any the most holy undertaking. Whereas when this desire ceases, I am as it were, dead without any sentiment to bring me back to Christ Jesus, or any instigation to make me return to him. Whence it follows, that not only all my unworthiness subsists, but that the extinguishing of this desire is, in some degree, the consummation of my unworthiness. A con- summate unworthiness, the consequences of which St. Ambrose was not afraid of swelling to exaggeration, when he held that the loss of this desire might be deemed a presage of future reprobation. Ah ! my Lord, (cries out this father,) it is of this adorable eucha- ON COMMUNION. 155 ristic bread the sacred Avritlngs speak when they tells us, tliat " they who estrange themselves from thee shall perish :" that is, all those who lose the desire of being united with you, shall be cast off by you. Now all this coincides with the notions of the first faithful. I shall dwell a little upon their example, an example that cannot be too often proposed. Upon that account it was, that when they were deprived of the holy mysteries, and communion was withheld them, they expressed so lively, so ardent a desire of being read- mitted. Upon that account it was that they asked it so pressingly, and conjured the priests, prostrate at their feet, to shorten the melancholy days they were ordered to live separate from their Saviour. Upon that account it was, that they besought the mar- tyrs to lend them their intercession ; and in this (says St. Cyprian) appeared their respect, their true respect. But how doth the man of the world demean himself? Content to resemble them in this separation, he takes no pains to follow their example in other respects ; and, confounding communion with the desire of commu- nion, he renounces equally both the one and the other, and retains no more for the sacrament of Christ, than an indifference of heart which sliould fill him with hon'or. This, beloved hearers, is what the fathers deplored so bitterly ; this is what they looked upon as one of the wounds, and greatest misfortunes of the times they lived in ; this is Avhat St. Chrysostom objected with such energy to the people of Antioch. What a shame, (says he,) my brethren, to see your coolness, when you are spoke to about receiving the Holy of Holies ! If a pompous spec- tacle be exhibited in toAXTi, it attracts your attention and you run to it in crowds, but nothing can induce you to take part in the august sacrifice of our altars. All your public places, all your amphitheatres are filled, but the table of Christ Jesus is aban- doned. In vain are we assiduous in distributing to you the celes- tial gifls : no one among you is willing to receive them. Christ Jesus waits for you in person, and he is forsaken. Sometimes this father represented to them mth what zeal they flocked to hear his discourses, while they discovered so little, to receive from his hands the pledge of their salvation. Sometimes he complained of their obduracy concerning this sacrament of love. Sometimes he showed them the dangerous consequences of the ill-judged respect on which they plumed themselves. And here, beloved hearers, |56 ON COMMUNION. imagine to yourselves that it is St. Chrysostom that addresses you, as in fact it is ; or bless kind heaven, which inspired that great man, in those days, with that which should now confound your pitiable, but pernicious errors. 3rdly. I have told you, and have already made appear in great part, that the respect which the worldling pleads in excuse for not receiving the body of the Lord, hath no conformity with that of the primitive ages of the church. Of this the proof is very obvious ; for in those flourishing ?iges of Christianity, the sinner, while separ- rate from the body of Christ, was taken up with the exercise of a laborious penance, of which he underwent the whole rigour with surprising courage. And this penance, according to the laws and discipline of the church, was not a mere ceremony, whereas it con- sisted of painful austerities. Abstinence and fasts, sack-cloth and ashes, hair-shirts and chains, and severe flagellations, were, it is well known, its inseparable concomitants. And hence it appears how greatly the sinner honoured Christ Jesus, since he desired to undergo such rigorous practices, and make him, at the expense of his ease and comfort, so signal a reparation. And now be it owned, to om* eternal shame, that proofs of this nature suit not the taste or devotion pf worldlings. In whatever respect fqr Christ they may pride themselves, they "vvill not put thomselves to that trouble. Infatuated with the world!", and with its false joys and false delicacy, they expect to come off at an easier rate. The sum total of their penance is, that they copimunicate no more ; a kind of penance that gives them no trouble. So far from it, it sooths their inclination, and occasions their living ill greater liberty, or, more properly, in greater libertinism. For, to this pass it is that things are brought by their pretext of false respect ; and I would to God that the mischievous error which I am now endeavouring to defeat, were a chimerical phantom, and not a real truth ! But I shall dismiss this topic, and proceed to show you, that this supposed respect for the sacrament is, in fact, a scandal in the hypocritical sinner, the subject of the third and last part. Part III. It is a pretty generally received maxim, that what is good in itself, is not always so with respect to the principle from which it derives ; and one of the rules of prudence js, to look on things even the most sajutary with a suspicious eye, so soon as ^e find that they flow from an infected and poisoned source. Now ON COMMUNION. 157 we may, nay, we ought to apply this rule to what regards religion and the practice of piety. I know not. Christians, whether you have ever made a reflection that to me seems solid, and the truth of which I am sure you will comprehend more easily than I do : to wit, that whenever disputes arose among Christians concerning relaxation or severity of discipline, certain libertines were not only ready, but eager to declare for and side with the severe party : not that they intended to embrace such opinion in practice and follow it, a disposition from which they were very remote ; but to enjoy the unaccountable pleasure of talking of it, or to make it serve as a convenient veil for covering their designs. Accordingly, there have been, time after time, men otherwise immersed in scandalous vices, men equally wrong-headed and corrupt-hearted, vain, volup- tuous, self-loving men who were the first and most zealous in standing forth in behalf and support of reformation. Women there have been, but too weU known for what they had been, and perhaps for what they were at that present ; women, whose mouths the past should have shut, who declaimed eloquently against de- pravity of manners, who thought nothing sufl^iciently exact or rigid in the government of the church, and who appealed incessantly to the ancient canons as they were in force at their first institution. But is not this zeal for the purity of morals and perfection of Christianity to be commended in a Christian ? Yes : (replies St. Bernard :) but the more commendable it is in a Christian, the more, to say the least of it, equivocal and doubtful it is in a libertine ; and I ought, according to the precept of our Saviour, to beware of it as I should of the most dangerous and base hypocrisy. Now what St. Bernard remarked in general, concerning the purity and regularity of morals, is still more particularly and sen- sibly verified with respect to communion. You know what came to pass : much was said, .and with great reason, of abuses com- mitted in the frequent use of the eucharistic sacrament, of the extreme facility with which it was to be feared that sinners were admitted to it, of the necessity of keeping from it for a limited time — of lukewarm souls who were not amended by it — of the dis- cretion and prudence which the pastors of the church were bound to use in these respects. All this was good, holy, edifying ; and I niake no doubt — (be pleased to mind it) — I make no doubt, that true believers, affected Avith the interests of God and of his church had upright intentions in tliis extraordinary display of their zeal. 158 ON COMMUNION. But to me it is amazing that persons of a quite different character, I mean your libertines and loose livers, should expect to be sup- posed of the same party ; and, that making a common cause mth those vnth whom they had nothing in common, they should be much the most strenuous and ardent in asserting the respect due to the sacrament of Christ and his adorable body. It is amazing that persons, thought by the most knowing to have but little religion, persons addicted to the greatest vices, should take upon them to talk with so much warmth against frequent communion, should so openly take offence at the least abatement, whether real or imagi- nary in this behalf, and should take part in the debate, as though it were a thing that nearly concerned them. All this is amazing. For, whence can all this zeal arise ? Impious as I suppose them, they harbour in their minds a secret contempt for every other Christian duty ; and of this they talk in the spuitual language of the perfect and the godly. Therefore they must have some inter- ested view, and you are too clear-sighted not immediatetly to dis- cern in what this interested view consists ; for, it is easily disco- verable ; and it is at least certain, that by so speaking they take to themselves the privilege of being libertines, not only with security, but, if I may venture to say it, wdth honour. For, these are they whom St. Paul describes in his epistle to Timothy ; men of tainted principles, whose faith is extinct in a great measure, and to whom every religious exercise and practice is a heavy burden they Avould gladly shake off. As they know, however, that communion was always regarded as a special mark of Christianity, and that to renounce it openly would be a kind of apostacy, the disgrace of which would be painful to them : for fear of being exposed to that degree, and yet to get rid of a troublesome yoke, they screen with religion their want of religion, (I know not Avhether I explain my meaning,) and they pass for approvers of that maxim, which, through a sentiment of fear and respect, withholds us from Chiist, to the end they may not be distinguished from even the most exact Christians, as they speak like them, and seem equally zealous. Now I hold that this language in the mouth of the libertine is a scandal to the weak. You ask me why ? Be attentive, if you please. Because it hath a tendency to two things equally perni- cious ; namely, to decry, indifferently, good and bad communions ; to keep away souls not only from communion but universally from everything holy in religion. ON COMMUNION. 159 1 St. To decry indifferently good and bad communions. For, (as St. Chrysostom rightly argues,) if at all times there is danger of bringing time piety into disesteem by running down the false, much more so is it, if the self-made judge is a profane wi'ctch, little solicitous Avhether he confound the one Avith the other ; a "wretch, who, more probably impeaches the one, for no other reason than that he is a secret enemy to the other ; a wretch, who, far from taking precautions to sift out and separate the truth from false- hood, seems rather affected -with a pruriency to destroy the truth by falsehood. Now what this father expressed concerning devo- tional duties, I may safely affirm (for experience confirms it) with regard to communion. If, by condemning bad communions, we must always be afraid of condemning good ones ; much more so, when the officious inspector's perverted reason makes him disregard both good and bad, and have no scruple of prejudicing those by decrying these. And, in reality, where tends the malignant zeal of impious, freethinking livers, who avail themselves of it to the great detri- ment of innumerable righteous and innocent souls ? It tends to do that in the church of God which the children of the high priest, Heli, did in the temple of Jerusalem : they kept away the people from the holy sacrifice. A crime which the Almighty held in execration, and for which he cast them off: " The sin was very great, because they kept men from the sacrifice of the Lord ;" (1 Kings ii. ;) or, if you please, it tends to do that w^hich the Pha- risees did, when the Saviour of the world for that reason told with indignation : " Wo be to you, who shut out others from the kingdom of heaven ; for ye neither go in yourselves, nor suffer them that are entering to go in." Matt, xxiii. This typifies Avhat is eveiy day done by a certain kind of men, who, having with- draAvn, through obduracy of heart, from the divine mysteries, by which (according to the doctrine of St. Cyril) the kingdom of God is laid open to us, would, were it possible, exclude all others. To this are all their endeavours directed. And truly they succeed but too well, by carping and sneering at worthy men on account of communion ; by censuring their lives ; by blaming their conduct ; by animadverting on every the slightest of their failings ; by for- ^ving nothing, but charging them with everything, St. Augustin, notwithstanding his vast comprehension, did not disapprove of daily communion ; but the rash worldling, bhnd and unskilled in 160 ON COMMUNION. the things of God, shall condemn it boldly and without hesita- tion. It was the sincere and hearty wish of the last oecumenical council, to see frequent communion restored in the church ; but the rash worldling would have it on the contrary be abolished and annihilated. Think not, however, beloved hearers, that I mean by this to assert the rectitude of every kind of frequent communion. Some there are which 1 cannot but deplore, but the judging of which I leave to God : that is, there are frequent communions, but unpro- fitable, unbecoming, disedifying, and calculated to give scandal rather than edification. I said I left it to God to pass judgment on them ; for as I should have the greatest horror of advancing aught that might seem to countenance such communions ; so should 1 condemn myself for prevarication, should I blame communion, however frequent, if performed with fervour. Others dishonour, these glorify Christ ; and as I should ever account those accursed who should ever approve of imperfect communion, the same shall I think of him who shall oppose what sanctifies souls, and redounds to the honour and glory of Christ. Who can pretend to say what numbers of righteous souls the evil spirit, by this sole artifice, hath kept from our altars ? How he hath disturbed the brides of Christ in their holy communications with the heavenly bride- groom ? How many communions, at which the angels would have rejoiced in heaven, hath he, as I may say, interdicted upon earth ? 2ndly. Further : from neglect of communion the scandal passes, if care be not taken to fence against it, to the abandoning or retrenching of all the most holy practices in religion ; and it is St. Chrysostom's second observation : For, admitting this counterfeit and mistaken humility as a rule of action, what dangerous conse- quences may not be drawn from it, and to what religious duties and observances is not a soul, though devoted to God, tempted to renounce ? You are unworthy to present yourself at the table of Christ, (it is St. Chrysostom that speaks,) and are you worthy to set foot in the temple of God ? Are you worthy to pray to and in- voke God ? Are you w^orthy to hear the word of God ? Are you worthy to be admitted to penance, and to the tribunal of the mercy of God ? Are you worthy, with his church, to sing the praises of God ? Are you worthy to be present when the divine sacrifice is offered up to God ? For the same reason, your duty obliges you to relinquish all this, and the sight of your unworthi- ON COMMUNION. IGl ncss, if I may so speak, sliould keep you In a kind of" excommuni- cation, which would cut you off from whatever is called Christian worship and duty. Thus concluded this holy doctor ; and to say nothing of virtuous souls, whose simplicity may be imposed upon by this delusion, this is the advantage which libertines would draw from it. They would be delighted with extending to all Christian obligations these words of the centurion, explained and wrested to their own sense : " Lord, I am not worthy." And as they employ them, libertines as they are, to seem humble and religious in not communicating ; so going a step farther, they would gladly find out a handle to forsake our churches through respect, to discontinue the use of prayer through respect — to rid themselves of every duty through respect. Now this is the scandal that ought to have been opposed. Pardon me, if I speak of it with some vehemence : it is to promote the interests of Christ and religion. Let the prelates of the church promulgate laws, and give pastoral charges, in order to reform the abuse of communion, they do their duty, and I shall always respect them. Let the priests, entrusted with the cure of souls, labour all they can to find proper remedies for the growing evil, it is essential to their function, and for that it was that God appointed them. Let even the laity, according to the measure of the gi-ace which God hath imparted to them, contribute thereunto, by beginning with themselves, before they extend their zeal to others, and I shall be edified at it. But that profane worldlings, bewildered and sightless in heavenly matters, perhaps destitute of divine faith, should take upon them to decide, to regulate, to disgi*ace with their errors and impiety, a case the most important in oiu- holy religion, is what I shall ahvays condemn and oppose with all my might. Let us use our endeavours, beloved brethren — (it is to you, ye priests of the living God, and ministers of his altars, it is to you I address myself) — let us use our endeavours to prepare for the Lord a godly people. United by the sacred bond of charity, let us labour indefatigably to convert sinners, to perfectionate the right- eous, to purify the faithful, with a view of making them worthy to receive the sacrament of Christ. This work it is that must take up our time ; to this end it is, that our labours must tend. For I am bold enough to aflfirm, beloved brethren, that the church of God will never be sanctioned, nor Christianity reformed but by good 162 ON PRaYEU. use of lioly communion. Keason and refine aa much as you please, you must always recur to these adorable words of our Saviour : " Unless ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, ye have no life in you." On the contrary, " he that eateth this bread, shall live for ever," shall live here in grace, and hereafter in glory. SERMON XXIV. ON PRAYER. " Behold a looman of Canaan, tvho came out of those coasts, saying : Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David I my daughter is grievously troubled by a devil." Matt. xv. If ever the force and efficacy of prayer were discovered in a sen- sible and striking manner, was it not. Christians, in the example which this passage of the gospel exhibits ? It discovers (says St. Ambrose) even a God surprised and struck -with admiration. He confounds the powers of hell and darkness ; works miracles and exerts his powers in behalf of a foreigner who hath recourse to him ; and who, though an idolater, ought to serve us as a pattern, and teach us hoAV to pray. Surprised he was, and struck with admiration : " O Avoman, great is thy faith !" Matt. xv. Thus, Christ explains himself. And do not her faith and the fervour of her prayer seem to give him surprise and unusual emotion ? He confounds the powers of hell and darkness, and works miracles. For, what petition doth this woman make ? That he would cure her daughter, who was cruelly worried by the evil spirit ; and the Son of God, by one word speaking, not only restored the possessed daughter to her right mind, but sanctified the mother: "Beit unto thee as thou wilt." Matt. xv. Notliing, therefore, is more efficacious with God than prayer. And yet, beloved hearers, how comes it that we find liim, by daily experience, not incHned to hear our petitions ? That althougli we pray, lie hears us not ? And that although we ask, we obtain nothing ? This is what I now am about to examine, and this is ON PRAYER. 1()3 to be the ground ol" the present discourse. It is a great subject, and of extreme consequence, and therefore deserving of particular reflection ; for I mean to inculcate the most excellent of all sci- ences — that of using the most powerful means of salvation in a proper manner. I mean to let you know the inestimable method and divine art of obtaining admittance to the throne of God, and prevailing -with him to send down upon us the most precious trea- sures of his holy grace. But in order to receive this gift of prayer, let us have recourse to prayer, and let us implore the divine aid in the usual fbmi. There is nothing more solidly established in religion, and in Christian theology, than the infallibility of prayer. Such is the force of it, (says St. Chrysostom,) that it renders, it should seem, the word of man equally powerful in a manner with the word of God. Equally powerful: for as God, with a word created all things: "He said, and they were made;" (Ps. cxhiii.;) so man need but ask, and all is granted him : "Ye shall ask what ye will, and it shall be done imto you." John xv. Every dav Ave hear Christians complain of the little advantage that accrues from prayer. Nor is it surprising. For how do we say that prayer is infalHble ? We suppose, to that purpose, a holy prayer : we suppose it per- foi-med Avith all the conditions that ought to attend it, and that God requires from us when he promises to grant Avhatever Ave shall ask. NoAv this is a common defect in our prayers. They are defec- tive in regard to the matter and the form : in regard to the matter, which is the thing we pray for ; and in regard to the form, Avhich is the manner of praying. This, St. James told the faithful of his time : " Ye ask, and receive not, because ye ask amiss." James iv. We ask not, in fact, for that for which God Avould have us ask ; and this is a defect as to the matter of prayer. Neither do Ave ask in the manner in Avliich he Avould have us ask ; and this is a defect as to the form of prayer. But let us put up our prayers like the woman of Canaan. Nothing more proper than her praver to Christ. She asks him to cast out the devil from her dau'diter. Nothing more engaging. In her prayer she puts all the virtue in practice Avhich can gain upon our Saviour and move his heart. I say, let us pray like this Avoman, else our prayers are fruitless. Either because avc ask not for the things for which Ave ouo-lit to ask : or, because Ave ask not for them in the manner in Avhich Ave ouii'ht to ask for them. 164 ON PRAYER. These are two lessons on which my duty obliges me to throw what light I can. Be attentive, Christians, and use your best endeavours to profit by them. Part I. It is on the nature of the things which we ask of God, that the very essence, and of course the merit, the efficacy, and the virtue of prayer depends ; and St. Chrysostom tells us, that it is by this rule we must call ourselves to an account for the small value which God sets on all the prayers we offer, and the little effect they have in his sight. And this is the admirable instruc- tion which the gospel affords us by the example of the woman of Canaan. For observe, if you please, (and may I be allowed to explain myself in this manner,) that whereas this woman, prostrate at the feet of our blessed Saviour, beseeches him to deliver her daughter from the power of the devil that possesses her ; we, on the contrary, influenced by a spirit directly opposite, beg of God every day what preserves in our souls the dominion of the devil— ^ nay of many devils, of which we are unwilling to be dispossessed. What more is necessaay to make you comprehend why the Saviour of the world gives ear to this foreigner, and works in her favour a miracle of his omnipotence ; and why, on the contrary, God is deaf to our supplications and rejects our prayers for the greatest part ? Apply your minds, beloved Christians, to the sublime doc^ trines which this subject will give me a favourable opportunity of displaying, as it includes the most important points concerning your predestination. I say we beg every day of God what preserves in our souls the dominion of Satan — because we beg of him things in our prayers, either prejudicial to salvation, or purely temporal and unprofitable for salvation ; or even supernatural and divine graces, but which, seeing the manner in which we conceive them, and in which we desire them, far from sanctifying us, serve rather to seduce us and withhold and divert us from the way of salvation. These three positions I shall endeavour to explain with all tla« clearness and precision I am able. 1st. In our prayers to God we ask for things prejudical to sal- vation : the first obstacle which stops the course of the divine mer- cies. For we must not imagine, beloved hearers, that we are not, though Christians, addicted in practice to the irregularities of paganism. Now, if we may ci'edit tlie pagans themselves, one of the irregularities of the pagans was to have recourse to their gods, ON PRAYER. IG5 and to ask of them that whicli they wouhl not have asked of an honest man ; which they would not have asked openly in the tem- ple, or at the foot of the altar Avithout a blush — as the death of a relation whose estate they longed for, or of a competitor at whose credit and merit they repined and envied — the ward's inheritance which they meant to embezzle, and which they beheld with a^a- ricious eyes. Such was the subject of their prayers. And, to give them more weight, they added the ceremonies of a superstitious worship, offerings, sacrifices, and corporal lustrations. To us, all tliis appears enormous and senseless. But, beloved Christians, in condemning them do we not pronounce sentence against ourselves ? If we compare their prayers Avith our own, are we less culpable ? What do I say ? Are we not more culpable to a great degree ? For, in short, they were pagans, and these pagans adored not only vain and false, but even vicious and disso- lute deities, according to their own belief. Now what Avas more natural, than to ask of such deities that which favoured their vices, and the corruption of their morals ? Was it not almost a necessary consequence of their infidelity ? But, Christian brethren, the God whom we serve is as pure and holy as he is powerful and great ; a God as essentially an enemy to injustice and to all sin, as he is God. And yet of this God, so pure, so holy, so equitable and just, what do we ask ? The accomplishment of our wishes and sensual desires, and the success of our base and criminal under- takings. This is miscalled an irregular proceeding : it is, I am bold enough to say it, an impiety, a sacrilege. True it is, and I freely grant, that now a-days Christians have learned the method of giving their prayers a more specious appeai- ance, and a better varnish, and of expressing them in terms not quite so invidious ; for, modern dissimulation and artfulness are carried to the highest perfection. But, although we may impose upon our own weakness, we cannot deceive God Almighty who hears us, and sees us, and distinguishes betAveen the malignity of our intentions and the simplicity of our expressions. To no pur- pose, therefore, doth the man of the world beg of God a subsistence suitable to his profession, and AvhercAvithal to support him accord- ing to his rank : for as his rank, or rather the idea Avhich he forms of his rank, is founded in the principles of an unbounded ambition, or mther an insatiable avarice, God's infinite penetration discovers his designs, counteracts his schemes, and defeats his VOL. II. M IGG ON PRAYER. hopes. To no purpose doth the fatlier of a family beg of God a settlement for his children in the world : for, as his views and schemes in their regai-d are profane and worldly, regulated neither by conscience nor by divine vocation, God Almighty overlooks the external appearance of an humble prayer, and knows its ten- dency ; and, by a just judgment, far from raising this family to dignities, permits its ruin to all intents and purposes, letting it moulder away, or sink into obscurity. To no purpose doth the woman of the world beg cf God health of body. For, whereas her health, considering the use to which she turns it, is productive only of sloth and idleness, of vicious deHcacy, perhaps of liber- tinism and a disorderly life, God, who beholds it, instead of keeping back the weight of his arm, strikes the more severely, and deprives her in that habitual listlessness of what might feed her self-com- placency, and flatter her vanity. To no purpose doth a man unjustly engaged in a law-suit, in which his whole fortune and dependence are at stake, beg of God to determine the cause in his favour : for as this law-suit is nothing, at bottom, but a covert injustice, maintained by chicanery, God Almighty, who knows it, in opposition to him espouses the cause of the widow and the orphan, and compels him to give up his pretensions with shame. Every means possible, however, are employed to move the will of God and procure his assistance. The very prayers, the very sacri- fice of the church is interposed. But because this business, which is carried on so warmly, is nothing but the secret machinations of a junto, a wicked intrigue, which can succeed only to the detriment of their neighbour, God Almighty, the protector of the innocent and the poor, on this occasion rejects even the most holy prayers of the church, even the most adorable sacrament of the altar. These particulars, were I to set them forth in their full extent, would lead me too far. But were you, beloved hearers, to apply them to yourselves, you would soon perceive that hundreds of times your hearts have beguiled you in the same manner, and induced you to pervert the end of prayer, in order to obtain of God himself the gratification of your passions. But to return to that on Avhich I was discoursing, and to depict this matter in the strongest colours of which it is susceptible, give me leave, Chi'istians, to dwell a little longer on the morals of the pagans. I said they were enough to work conviction ; but I said too little, and I add that in one sense, even in this place, they are ON PRAYET?. 1G7 more proper to put us to the blush than the doctrine of the fathers. Permit me, therefore, to make a profane author speak in this pulpit, and to impeach your conduct — either for your instruction, or for your confusion — as he did the manners of his own times in such spirited and energetic terms. Tell me, (says he,) deploring the abuses in ancient Rome, and upbraiding the false devotees of pa- ganism, who importuned the gods with their unrighteous prayers ; tell me your thoughts concerning Jupiter, and the place he holds in your estimation. Have you the same respect for the greatest of your gods as for the wisest of your magistmtes. This question (continues he) surprises you. But I do not propose it without reason. For would you wait on this magistrate, whose virtue you revere, to offer him in his palace the infamous supplication which you make to Jupiter in the most awful of his temples ? You, therefoi*e, suppose Jupiter more liable to be corrupted, when you think him disposed to hearken to your prayers, and even ready to gi*ant them a favourable hearing. Thus spoke a pagan upon this subject. In this sarcastic strain he reproached his fellow-subjects wdth the scandal of their religion, and perhaps was conducive to their reformation. Thus infidelity gives us wholesome lessons, and condemns the impropriety of our proceedings. Let us apply this to our own morals. And what must our notions be of our God, the God of holiness ? Is he the promoter of our vices ? The accomplice of our crimes. Is it possible he could, or would be such? From this source, however, flow all our actions, and our behaviour toAvards him. For when I pray — take with you in your minds tliis remark of St. Chrysostom — when I pray I expect, that God in his mercy and paternal condescension will conform to my wishes ; that his divine will, efficacious and all-powerful, shall coincide mth mine wliich is nothing but weakness ; and that he will accomplish my desires, which without his aid would be to no purpose. Put then the case, that blinded by the spirit and maxims of the Avorld, far from praying in a Christian manner, I pray mth a view to satisfy my ambition, my pride, my resentment, my revengeful heart — what do I do ? I ask God to agree with me upon these heads ; that is, I wish he would be vain like myself, passionate like myself, violent like myself; and that for me, who am his creature, he would vouchsafe to do that which he cannot do without ceasing to be God. Now to address our prayers to him in this manner, would m2 1(J8 ON PRAYEU. not be to pray to liim as the God of heaven, but to dishonour in a high degi-ee the most adorable of his attributes ; it Avould be to make him, as far as on me depends, subservient to my ini- quities, as he complains himself by the mouth of his prophet : " Thou liast made me to serve with thy sins, thou hast put me to pain with thy iniquities." Isai. xliii. The expression is remark- able : " Thou hast put me to pain." As who should say : your prayer hath given me uneasiness ; for, on one hand, I would gladly have been propitious to it ; and, on the other, I could not give it a favourable hearing ; my heart was according in a kind of fluc- tuation, and, as It were, divided betAveen my holiness and my goodness : my goodness which took part with you, and my holi- ness which was against you ; my goodness which inclined me to compassionate your distress, and my holiness Avhich obliged me to reject your supplication : '* Thou hast put me to pain Avith thy Iniquities." And truly. Christians, if God in that case had made account of our prayers, would It not be a stumbling- block ? Would it not make us call his providence in question ? I know that we have (as St. John Informs us) the Son, a pow- erful advocate with the Father, and that Ave pray through the merits of this adorable Son. But to apply In particular to God made man Avhat I said of God in a general Avay — Avould we make him the patron of our blind desires, by Avlilch we are SAvayed ? And If this be not the sentiment by Avhich Ave are Impelled, why should we lay stress and dependence on his merits, In the prayers which our desires alone inspire ? Happy It is for you, that your gracious God, to obstruct your perdition, Is Inflexible to your prayers. In this seeming rigour you should acknowledge his mercy. What Avould become of you, were he more indulgent and more conformable to our inclinations ? What hath been the ruin of, and what ruins daily, such numbers of families, but too vast and unlimited, nay, criminal wishes? What hath occasioned the eternal reprobation of so many Chris- tians ? AVas It not the having obtained whafGod could not grant but in the excess of his wrath ? And whence comes the loss of so many worldlings, who are damned amidst opulence, ease, and effe- minacy, but from those supposed favours of God, Avho hears them and Indulges the senseless desires of their heart, contrary to the designs of his amiable providence ? You ask that of God which sooths your passion ; and If he lends a favovu'able ear to your re- quest, he Avho foresees that Avhich avIII j)ervert you, that Avhich ON I'ltAYEIl. 169 will corrupt you, that which will plunge yoni into the mighty gulf, what more rigorous punishment can be inflicted ? What more dreadful vengeance can be exerted ? But to proceed : 2ndly. If you do not ask always for things prejudicial, and with views directly contrary to salvation, you supplicate, at least, for things merely temporal and no way profitable to that end. I Avould not, however, be supposed to insinuate that the good things of this life are not the gifts of heaven, or that they are absolutely contrary to salvation. But when are they such — and on what account doth God refuse them ? When we ask for them neither according to the order which himself hath established, nor rela- tively to the end which he hath pointed out to us. In the first place, regardless of spiritual favom'S, we ask only for temporal ones, as the advantages of fortune, prosperity, tranquillity, all which terminate in the necessaries of life. These we desire, and these we seek ; and these are desired and sought by Infidels, as well as by us : " For, all these things do the heathens seek." Matt. vl. These are good things, I own : but they are perishable things — things of an order Inferior to man, especially to a Christian man ; dangerous things and liable to be perverted, though really good, Into real evils. In regard to solid and Incorruptible things, as purity of manners, a good conscience, humility, faith, the love of our neighbour, whatever may serve to sanctify the soid, and raise it to perfection, to our shame be It said, we supinely neglect and seldom revolve at the foot of the altar. IVhich of you hath ever had recourse to God with a view of becoming more moderate in his passions and more regular in his conduct ? You visit the tombs of the martyrs, but wliy ? To be cured of a distemper, not to be delivered from a temptation. You Invoke the saints, but why ? To be more happy and more opulent, not more humble and more an enemy to pleasures. Ah ! cries Salvian, If we groan under the pressure of public calamities ; if the land be threatened with famine or pestilence ; If the people be swept away by a raging mortality, we run precipitately and In crowds to the temple of the living God, and our sighs, lamentations, and prayers are heard In every corner. But though unbridled libertinism dishonours Christianity, and brings grief to the church, we enjoy tranquillity and a peaceful mind. Instead of praying that heaven would put a stop to scan- dalous Impieties, we suffer our days to pass in quietness and a dreadful indolence. 170 ON PRAYEK. Thus we pray like the wi-etched Antiochus, whose selfish prayer was unable to find grace in the presence of God : " This wicked man prayed unto the Lord, of Avhom he was not to find mercy." Mach. ix. He prayed, neither can it be denied that he prayed with all possible ardour ; he prayed, but he prayed in a worldly way ; he prayed, but asked not for the spirit of penitence, or the gift of piety, or respect for the sacred things he hath profaned, but for health which he preferred to all the rest and of which he was fond to a great degree : " This wicked man prayed unto the Lord," but the Lord shut the bowels of liis mercy against him. We, too, pray in the same manner ; but God never promised to warrant such prayers. Examine the gospel, and you -will there find the reason of it. Christ says to his disciples: "If you shall ask the Father any- thing in my name, he will give it you." John xvi. But observe (says St. Augustin) these Avords, any thing, by which our Saviour lets us understand that what we ask in his name should be some- thing, and something worthy of him, because it were improper, in the other supposition, that he should exert and manifest his power in our behalf. Now all the good things of the world together, con- sidered disjunctively from eternal bliss, are as nothing in the presence of Almighty God. To ask, therefore, of God in this manner, is to ask for nothing ; and although the promise of Christ is general, or should seem to be so, they are not by themselves comprised therein. In order to be convinced of it, hear what he adds, speaking to the apostles : " Hitherto ye have asked nothing in my name." John xvi. And, indeed, to remain in his presence on Thabor was a delight- ful sensation of which St. Peter desired the continuance. To possess in his kingdom the chief places, was, according to the meaning of those two disciples, a vain honour which their ambition grasped at, because they beheld it through a false medium. But the zeal of souls, constancy in persecution, and self-denial, were the essential favours of which they stood in need, as no other favours could uphold and animate them, and raise them to perfec- tion in their apostolic functions. For these, however, it never entered into their heads to petition their Master : " Hitherto ye have asked nothing." Now, of how many Christians might I not at this day make the same complaint ? And of those who hear me, to how many might 1 not have just cause to say for the same reason : man of the ON PRAYER. 17 » world, thou hast hitherto petitioned thy God for nothing, forasmuch as thou hast not, in thy sinful state, petitioned him lor thy con- version, for an humble mind, for a contrite heart, for the grace to renounce thy evil habits, and to stifle and conquer thy vicious inclinations ? This, however, was the signal grace, the gi*ace of graces which thou oughtest to have asked for and sought with all diligence. Fm-ther : when the Saviour of the world assures us, in the gospel, that whatever we shall ask in his name shall be granted, he sup- poses we sliall ask according to the rule which he hath himself laid down. For, as Tertullian well observes, it is he himself who regu- lates prayer, and quickens it with his Spirit, communicating to it the special power and privilege of penetrating into the highest heaven, and moving to compassion the heart of God, by laying before his all-seeing eyes the weaknesses and miseries of mankind. Now what is that rule, tliat divine rule by which Chi'ist Jesus commands us to pray ? Seek first, says he, the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and you shall Avant for nothing. Ask of my Father the sanctification of his name, the coming of his king- dom, the fulfilling of his will, not the material bread which serves for aliment, and then Avill I assist you. But if you run counter to this regulation, and, by an attachment to the world unbecoming your profession, you seek earthly bread before the kingdom of God, put your affiance no longer in my merits, however infinite, as your prayer how fervent soever it may be is not calculated according to the plan which I have sketched : " Seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness." Matt. vi. Not but we may ask for temporal blessings : the church herself is wont to do so. But let us ask for them like the church ; let us ask for them after having first, and above all things, asked for spiritual favours ; let us ask for the blessing conferred on Jacob and not on Esau. What a noble allc- goiy doth the example of these two brothers exhibit ! Mind the application I make of it to my subject. They had each to his share the dew af heaven and the fat of the earth. Where lies the difference ; and by what special sign doth the scripture make appear the election of .lacob and rei)robation of Esau ? Ah ! Christians, by this — that in the blessing conferred on Jiicob, the dew of heaven is expressed antecedently to the fat of the earth : " God give thee of the dew of heaven and fatness of the earth ;" whereas in tlie other, the fat of the earth is mentioned previously to the dew 172 ON niAYER. of heaven : "In the fiitness of the earth and in the dew of heaven from above shall be thy blessing." Gen. xxvii. This is what every day happens among us, and Avhat discrimi- nates prayers truly Christian from those which are not. A righteous man and a worldly-minded man put up then' prayers in the same church, and before the same altar ; but one prays righteously, and the other like a worldling. How ? Doth one beg only the influ- ence of grace, and the other nothing but earthly advantages ? No ; for it may so happen that the righteous man, with the influence of grace shall supplicate sometimes for an increase of fortune, as well as the worldly man ; and that the worldly man shall ask with an increase of fortune the influence of grace, as well as the righteous man. But the worldly man, instigated by the spirit of the world, places an increase of fortune before the influence of grace, " the fatness of earth and the dew of heaven ;" but the righteous man, prompted by the Spirit of God, prefers the influence of grace to an increase of fortune, " the dew of heaven and the fatness of the earth." He says to God : Lord, sanctify me ; make me chaste, charitable, merciful, patient ; give me the dew of heaven, and grant me forth- with the good things of this life, so far as they may conduce to my eternal welfare ; give me the fatness of the earth. But the worldly man says: "Lord, make me rich, great, powerful; give me the fatness of the earth ; neither refuse me the grace which is necessary to the leadinfic of a virtuous life —