U^>^ r il[ffl VfuH 5 ■frv- f >■ *N E (/ '' 2 IJUHr > *' f K | 1 1 5 5 V < ■* ' : " ■* V,-. "■ - ,'.'' ■ -: 73 .'V v- f -7 / .^ ■ 1WA *LJ>* y. 3- 19. 7 '7u^? v - i ' u SeS *-• Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from Princeton Theological Seminary Library http://archive.org/details/actofassociateprOOasso fjf &**)*»■«£ Wee**/***. , 2 . A* orJLc**-^ H^ (Lett****- «/ ' j/' * ' jL'JZi*r *rLy~~* S+JX~. ,/'/".-. iff — 1 — - 6<6 — 3 - - - 44 — A - < __,5 V &6 — *7 ~7~- - Z^ /L^et 5 z"^ » 1 1 m ■ •*v ..'...4* ■ ^VH :-;®^,' 185? .•.'.;•• = H ^H ■ I ■ m H HH ■ Hi HBBJ ; >tv-^^' ■ ^^ A C OF THE ASSOCIATE PRESBYTERY, CONCERNING THE Dc&ine of Grace: WHEREIN The faid Doctrine, as revealed in the Holy Scriptures, and agreeably thereto, fet forth in our Confejfion of Faith and Catechifms, Is ASSERTED and VINDICATED, From the Errors vented and publifhed in fome Acls of the AJfem-« blies of this Church, pafled in Prejudice oi the. fame. WITH An INTRODUCTION, Discovering the Rife and Progrefs of the Oppqfition to the Doctrine or Grace, and the Reafon of pqjjing and publifhing this Act, in Vindica- tion of the fame. EDINBURGH: Printed by Neill and Company. Sold by W. Laing, Edinburgh ; J. Duncan, Glafgow ; Morison anci Son, Perth ; W. Knight, Aberdeen, and R. Nil col, Dundee. M,DCC,LXXXIX. INTRODUCTION. Difcovering the Rife and Progrefs of the Oppofition to the Dotlrine of Grace, and the Reafons of palling and publifhing this Acl, in vindication of the fame. OPPOSITION to the revelation of the Grace of God, is in- terwoven with the corrupt nature of man. There is nothing, wherein the univerfal depravation of the human nature more evi- dently appears, than in defpiling and rejecting the grace of God, which bringeth falvation to all men : For, by the plan of falvation, as it is laid out and extended in the holy Scriptures, the greateft revenue of glory redounds to God ; and therefore it is the great - eft evidence of enmity in the linner, to flight the manifold wifdom and unfpeakable love of God, that mines therein. It would feem ftrange to one, who knew nothing of the corruption of the human nature, that any mould refufe the choiceft bleffings, for this reafon, that they are freely given, and becaufe it is the will of God that they be freely received by thofe who are wretched, miferable, poor, blind and naked : Yet fo it is, that finners, in thefe deplorable cir- cumftances, have, in all ages, manifefted the warmefl oppolition to the free grace of God through Jems Chrift, wherever it has been revealed unto them ; and this has been the fpring of all the de- generacy and apoftafy of the Church, both under the Old and Neiv Teftaments. When the Lord erecled the Jews into a National Church at mount Sinai, the Moral Law, as it was there publifhed, and all the Sacrifices and typical Ordinances which he inftituted among them, were full of free grace and mercy, and were plainly defigned to lead men off from all their own doings for life, unto the doing and dying of the glorious MeJJiah as the only ground of their juftifi- cation, and title to eternal life : But it is obvious from Scripture, that the generality of the Jewijh Church contemned and rejected the grace of God, difplayed in the types and fhadows, promifes and prophecies of that difpenfation ; therefore the Lord gave them up to their own hearts lu/is, and they wandered in their o%V7i counfels : And fo, before their captivity, they fell frequently into idolatry, and after it, placed the whole of their righteoufhefs in the mere out- ward observance of the Ceremonial Law, together with their own traditions, as is evident from the repeated charges laid againft the Scribes and Pharifees by our Lord, when dwelling amongft us in the days of his humiliation - 9 and accordingly the Spirit of God teftifies agaimP- iv INTRODUCTION. againfl the great body of the Jewi/Jo Nation, that being ignorant of God's righteoufnefs, and going about to eftablifh their own righte- oufnefs, they fa bmitted not themfelves to the righteoufnefs of God* The fame legal fpirit appeared very early in the Chriftian Church. The natural bias that is in the heart of man, unto juftifi- cation by works of the Law, difcovered itfelf in the tenets and opinions, which were taught and vented by the falfe teachers in the very firft age of Chriftianity ; as is manifeft from feveral of the Epijlles of Paul, where, in oppofition to thefe falfe teachers, the doctrine of juftification by the fre e grace of God, or by faith with- out the works of the Law, is largely infilled upon. And as this fpirit oiLegalifm was at the bottom of all the errors that ever in- felted the Chrilfian Church ; fo we find it runs through the whole Myflery of Iniquity, that has been vented and maintained by Ro- mifh Babylon, to the ruin of multitudes of precious fouls. When the Lord was pleafed to bring about the Reformation of this land from PopiJJj darknefs, it was by the means of preaching the gofpel -doctrine of free grace, and juftification through the im- puted righteoufnefs of the Lord Jefus Chrift. This was the founda- tion and ground-work of the other fteps of reformation in the wor- ibip, difcipline and government of the houfe of God : The Lord's fervants being animated by faith's views of gofpel-grace, were bold and valiant in fetting up and defending all the parts of Reformation, according to the pattern fhewn in the Word of God: And thus a nation was born at once, and a people brought forth in one day. But the enemies of our Reformation, envying the flouriiliing flate of this Church, were indefatigable in contriving ways and means to fully her beauty, and to bring her again under the yoke of bon- dage, from which me had been relieved by fuch a wonderful chain of adorable providences. Accordingly, feveral years after the Re- formation, Prelacy was introduced, and the Arminian fcheme, being hatched abroad, and calculated to exalt the powers of corrupt na- ture, loon met with a favourable reception, about the beginning of the laft century, from the Prclatic party both in Scotland and Eng- land ; who, as they were pointing plainly towards Rome, fo they embraced the Arminian errors, as opening a more eafy pafTage to that idolatrous Church. Not to fpeak of the keennefs, whereby Laud's party in England propagated this doctrine, it is well known, that the apoftate Prelates in Scotland at that time were mofl warm and zealous defenders thereof ; as appears net only by the fevere fentences pafTed by that Antichriilian court, the high commifjion, whereof they were members, againfl many of the Lord's fervants and people, particularly, the act. of bani/hment pafTed againfl that eminent fervant of Chrift, Mr Samuel Rutherford, from his flock at Anwoth to Aberdeen, for writing againfl the Armini ' ns at that time; but alfo, by the juft cenfures palled by that memorable Af- icmbly at Glafgow, amio 1638, againft thefe pretended Bi/hops, and fettle other miniflers, who were deeply invoked in the fame defec- tion ; INTRODUCTION.. v tion : Where, befides many grofs fcandals and immoralities, it will be found, that many of thefe men were depofed, and otherwife cenfured, for teaching and venting Popijh and Arminiun errors ; as may be feen from the tranfa&ions of that Aflembly, related in that excellent Latin hiftory, entituled, Hijioria motuum in regno Scotice. When the Prelates, who were the ftrenuous defenders of Armini- anifm, were thus juitly cenfured in Scot /and, they fled into England; where, befides their being the firjl Authors of the civil war, they procured a large- Declaration to be fent unto Scotland, in the King 's name, wherein that famous AJfembly 1638, is feverely condemned in the whole of their conduct, and particularly, for inflicling cen- fure upon Arminians. As this paper was juftly condemned by the AJfembly that met at Edinburgh 1639, and afterwards by the Ejlates of the kingdom, as a fcandalous libel upon this Church and Nation •, fo by the Lord's blemng upon the reformation of this Church, which he then brought about by his mighty arm, the open defenders of Arminianifm durft not fet up their heads, during the whole time of that reforming period, till abjured Prelacy was again re-impofed after the Rejloration of King Charles II. But, although the Arminia?i dodtrine had poifoned multitudes both in Scotland and Englafid, by means of the Popi/h and Prela- tic party of thefe times ; yet, as the errors, held by Arminius and his followers, were condemned by the famous Synod that met at Dort, anno 16 19, and by this Church, anno 1638, and by all the divines of any reputation for foundnefs, both abroad and at home ; fo, this pernicious fcheme being fo direclly contrary to the Scrip- ture-doclxine contained in the ConfeJJicns of the reformed Churches, few of the more fober and ferious in thefe lands were milled there- by : Until, at length, a more refilled, and confequently, a more dan- gerous, fcheme of Arminianifm was hatched and vented in England, by Mr Richard Baxter ; which, as it came nearer to the legal terms that fome time before had been ufed by divines of reputed ortho- doxy, in explaining of gofpel-truth •, fo it quickly fpread, like an overflowing Flood, among thofe of the Prejbyterian perfuaiion in England, and gradually crept into many pulpits of Scotland, even after the Revolution ; partly out of zeal againft the real Antmomiuns^ and partly by reafon of the great noife raifed by fome minifters a- gainft the preachers of the Doclrine cf Grace, as teachers of Anti- nomianifm : And, by this means, the doctrine of the gofpel, quickly getting the name of a new fcheme, became, almoll every where, evil fpoken of. When matters with refpedt. to dodtrine came to fo deplorable a Situation in this Church, that they who taught the abfolut-j :ree- dom of the Covenant of Grace, and the unlimited Grant, that God hath made in his word, of Chrift and falvation with him, to the world of mankind, and fuch like doctrines, were branded as vent- ing a new fcheme of divinity ; it is no wonder that the Church of Scotland fhould grow worfe and worfe, and be left, in the righte- ous vi INTRODUCTION. «us judgment of God, to an open affronting of the truth of the gofpel, and consequently of Chrift himfelf, who is the fubftance of it, by the Aflembly that met anno 171 7, when they difmifled without cenfure a Profejfor of divinity, who had taught a fcheme of Pelagian and Arminian errors mentioned and condemned in a former AB of this Preibytery. And from that time forward there is the warmed oppofition made to the Doctrine of Grace, whenever it came upon the field, before the judicatures of this Church, whereof there are fome lamentable inftanees condefcended upon in the following AB. From this fhort account of the rife and progrefs of the oppofition to the Doctrine of Grace, may be gathered the great hazard and danger that this Church and land are in of being over-run with Paganifm and Infidelity : For though the Lord has been pleafed to make gofpel-light break forth in fome corners of the land, yet in many more places, the darknefs is no lefs remarkably increafed, and oppofition to the truths of the gofpel is mightily abounding ; yea the floodgates of legal and corrupt doctrine are fo wide opened, particularly by many preachers and minifters that have lately entered into the Church, as to threaten the utter extinguifhing of any beams of light that have been mining amonglt us. Many are the awful fymptonn and evidences of the danger we are in this way. Such as (1.) The intolerable freedom that is ufed with the holy Scriptures ; fome denying them in bulk ; others wrefting them to their own deftruclion ; and others palling profane jefts upon them \ whereby that word is fadly verified among us, 2 Pet. iii. 3.-- -There fh all come in the lafil days [coffers walhitig after their own lujls. {2.) Socinian and Arminian Doctrine is now in fuch general requeft, that fome have ventured openly to recommend thefe principles, without being noticed by any of the judicatories of the Church. Mr William WifJmrt, Principal of the College of Edin- burgh, has recommended Dr Scougal's Life of God in the foul of man, upon which Mr Whitejield's experiences are founded ; a book calculated to lead off from faith in the righteoufiiefs of Chrift with- out us, to a righteoufnefs within us, and inward fenfutions as the ground of our pardon and acceptance before God. The faid Mr IVifhart has alfo recommended Dr Whichcofs fermons unto young minifters and Undents \ a book that is open and plain in favours of the Socinian and Arminian fchemes. When a worthy minifter of this Church recommended the Marrow of Modern Divinity, a book v being a branch of true repentance, importing purifi- cation of heart, and the exercife of love, which is the fulfilling of the law) is in Scripture exprefsly declared to be a fruit of faith, which faith is the foul's coming to Chrift ; and consequently to maintain, that we mull forfake fin in order to our coming to Chrift, is as much as to fay, we muft have repentance, purity of heart and love, in order to our believing ia Chrift : Whereas, on the contrary, the Lord hath declared in his word, Xh-dX faith worheth by love ; that he purifies the hearts of his people by faith ; and has promifed, that they fh all look upon him whom they have pierced, and JJjall mourn for him. According to the Affembly 's doctrine, our forfaking of fin, which is the removal of the foal's difeafe, muft be at leaf! com- menced or begun, in order to our coming to him who is the rhy- fician ; and that we muft repent of our fin, in order to our coming to him who is exalted to give repentance as well as forgivenefs of fins : Whereas the Spirit of God, in Scripture, has declared, that God having raifed up his Son 'Jefus hath fent him to blefs us in turn- ing away every one of us from his iniquities ; and that finners are called and invited to look and come to Chrift for falvation both from fin and wrath, and this without regard unto any previous qualifi- cations in them. This coming is indeed inconfiftent with a refolu- tion to go on in fin ; yet it is plain, that no finner can wafh him- felf before he come to the fountain opened for fin and uncleannefs : Whereas the Affembly have inverted this order, and have faid, up- on the matter, that we muft be holy, or fo and fo qualified, in or- der to our coming to Chrift, or having a vital union with him ; which is the very foul of Neonomian and Arminian doctrine. Ac- cording to Scripture, all gracious actings of the foul, (whereof the forfaking of fin is an eminent one) flow from that virtue and influ- ence, which is derived from Chrift the true Vine, and that in a way of faith's union with him ; fince, without him, or feparate from him, we can do ?iothi?ig: And therefore it is vain to pretend to any gracious, evangelical or acceptable act, but by virtue of grace and ftrength derived from Chrift, or until the foul come to Chrift, and be united to him, as the living Root, and Fountain of all gracious influence. (3.) As forfaking of fin is no fmall part of conversion, fo the above act of Affembly evidently tends to exalt man's natural powers, and his own ability to convert himfelf, or prepare himfelf thereunto ; and thus it greatly favours the Pelagian doctrine on this head, exprefsly contrary to Scripture, which declares, that naturally we are dead in trefpaffes and fins ; vjithcut fircngth, yea, that our mind is enmity agauiji God. Wherefore the Prefbytery did, and hereby do, upon the grounds and reafons above mentioned, CONDEMN the following proposi- tions, as unfound doctrine. (1.) That (notwithstanding the forefaid gofpel- 3 4 AEl concerning the Boclrine of Grace. gofpel-order and connection of duties) mankind miners muft: forfake their fins, in order to their coming to Chrift, and being initated in covenant with God. (2.) That a natural man can of himfelf forfake his fin ; or, that he can receive any ftrength from Chrift, to enable him to forfake fin in a fpiritual and evangelical manner, until, by the power of the Spirit of Chrift working faith in him, he come to Chrift, is united to him, and thus created in Chrift Jefus unto good works. (3.) That any good or commendable qualifications are re- quired or expefied of finners, in the gofpel-call or offer, in order to their coming to Chrift, and being inflated in covenant with God. All which propofitions are contrary to the Doctrine held forth from the holy Scriptures in our ConfiJJion of Faith, chap. ix. § 3. " Man " by his fall into a ftate of fin, hath wholly loft all ability of will " to any fpiritual good accompanying falvation ; fo as a natural " man, being altogether averfe from that good, and dead in fin, is " not able, by his own ftrength, to convert himfelf, or to prepare " himfelf thereunto." And chap. xiv. § 2. where the principal acts of faving faith are faid to be, " accepting, receiving, and refting " upon Chrift alone for Sanctification," whereof forfaking fin is a branch. And the Preibytery acknowledge, ajfert and declare, That it is the duty of all, upon the revelation of Chrift in the gofpel, and with- out looking for any previous qualifications in themielves, infiantlj to believe in him for falvation, both from fin and wrath ; and that, in fo doing only, they will be made, in a gofpel manner, to mourn for fin, forfake it, and live unto righteoufnefs : So that it is not pojjible for any man, of himfelf, to forfake his fins, nor is it cotifijlent with the Divine method of grace held forth in the gofpel, that a fin- ner ihould receive ftrength and grace to forfake his fins, or actually to exercife gofpel-repentance, until he is determined and enabled by the power of the fpirit of faith, to look or come to Chrift, the Prince and Saviour exalted to give repentance and forgivenefs of fins. Therefore, upon the grounds and reafons forefaid, the Preibytery exhort and warn all under their infpection, to be aware of every doctrine that has a tendency to pervert the gofpel-ordcr in the man- ner above condemned ; or to exalt corrupt nature unto an ability r,f will to any fpiritual good accompanying falvation : As the above doctrine, of forfaking our fin in order to our coming to Chrift, ma- nifeftly doth -, in regard a natural man can no more forfake his fin, or qualify himfelf for the grace of God, than the Ethiopian can change his fkin, or the leopard his fpots, according to the doctrine contained in the forefaid pafiages of our Confejfion, and in our Lar- ger Catcchifm, ^32. S E c T 1 o N II. [Concerning the Injuries done to the Doctrine of Grace, by the Afifemblies 1720 and 1722.] Opposition to gofpel-truth did farther appear, when, in the year 1720, the Afienibly took cccafion from the reprinting of a bock entituled Acl concerning the Doclrine of Grace. 15 entituled, The Marrow of Modern Divinity, with a preface by a worthy minifter of this Church, now deceafed, to give a more deep wound to the gofpel-doctrine of free Grace ; by condemning feveral precious and important truths, through the fides of that book, in the 5th Acl of the faid Affembly. And although , upon a reprefentatiott given in by fome minifters to the Affembly 1721, laying open the dangerous confequences of the faid acl, the AfTembly that met anno 1722, afferted the truth, concerning fome points of doctrine, in the exprefs words of our Confeffion and Catechifms, yet the faid acl: of AiTembly 1720, not only Hands unrepealed, but its authority, as a (landing aft in full force, is maintained and confirmed by Acl 7th Affembly 1722, entituled, Acl concerning Doclrine, confirming and. explaining the ails $th and Sth cf the General Affembly anno 1720. In the faid acl, * The General Affembly finds, that the ' faid Affembly 1720, in thefe Acts, had no deflgn to recede from ' the received doclrine of this Church, nor by them have done in- 4 jury to truth, nor given countenance to error and confi- * dering, that the brethren's defire, that the acl: 1720 mould be 1 repealed, is unjuft, the Affembly does refufe the fame.' And in regard the faid act 1722 isexprefsly faid to be in vindication of the above two Acls of Affembly 1^20, and for wiping off (what they call) injurious afperfions, cajl upon them by the brethren, in their reprefentation ; it plainly follows, that whatever truths may feem to be afferted by the Affembly 1722, they can be underftood in no ether fenfe, than will agree with the acls of Affembly 1720. Wherefore although this Prefbytcry are far from putting that book, entituled the Marrozv of Modem Divinity, or any other private compofure, upon a level with our a-pprovenftandards of Doclrine ; or to vindicate every exprefiion in that book, or any other private writing, as abfolutely faultlefs : Yet, in regard the Affembly have iingled out the faid book, of all ethers that have been publifhed, and paffed fuch a peculiar fentence againff it, firitlly prohibiting and difcharging all the minijlers of this Church to recommend the faid book, and requiring theni to warn their people not to read or ufe the fame ; though the difference between the Law and the Gofpel, and between the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace, as alfo the true way of attaining gofpel-holinefs, be therein fet forth in a very clear light. And likewife, in regard that many of the lefs judicious may be impofed upon, to believe that all and every one of the pofitions, condemned i* the forefaid Acls of Affembly, are damnable herejies ; when the Affembly 1722 * do ffriclly prchibiD 1 and difcharge all the minifters of this Church to ufe, by writing, 4 printing, preaching, cateehiiing, or otherwife teaching, either pub- 1 licly or privately, thefe or any of thefe pofitions above menti- 4 oned (in their acV or what may be equivalent to them, or of 1 like tendency, under the pain of the cenfures of this Church, * conform to the merit of their offence :' And ^farther, conlidering that, under the colour of condemning the faid book, feveral impor- tant and previous truths are deeply wounded, and the purity of electrise. 16 Act concerning the Doctrine of Grace. doctrine contained in our Confeffion of Faith and Catechifms, ob- fcured and perverted : Therefore, upon the above and other weighty reafons, this Prefbytery judge it their duty, to endeavour the prefer vation of the purity of doctrine, and that the fame may be faithfully tranfmitted to fucceeding generations, by -vindicating the profefTed principles of this Church from the injuries done them, in the above-mentioned acls, and afferting the truth from the holy Scriptures and our llandards of Doctrine, in oppoiition to the errors and miftakes contained in the faid acls. Article I, [Of the Injury done to the Doctrine of Grace, under the Head of Univerfal Atotiement and Far don. ~\ TnEfrf head of Doctrine, as clafTed by the AfTembly 1720, in Xhziv jifth act, concerning a book entituled the Marroiv of Mo- dern Divinity, is concerning the nature of faith *. But, becaufe of the relation that there is between faith and the gift or grant that God has made of Chrift unto mankind in the gofpel-promife, and the dependency that faith has thereupon, it will be necefTary, in order to the more diftinct opening up of the nature of faith, to take notice firit of the injuries done to Truth by the forefaid AfTembly 1720, act 5. under the head of Univerfal Atonement and Pardon. Under this head, the following pafTages are quoted by the Af- fembly, Marrow, &c. p. 108. * Chrift hath taken upon him the ' fins of all men.' The author's words are, * Chrift, as man's fivre- i ty, — - — -according to that eternal and mutual agreement, that ' was betwixt God the Father and him, put himfelf in the ■ room and place of all the faithful, lfa. liii. 6. A?id the Lord hath ' laid on him the iniquity of us all. Then came the law, as it is the * covenant of works, and faid (N. B. Here the author cites Lu- * ther's words 1 I find him a finner, yea, fuch an one as has taken ' upon him the fins of all men, therefore let him die and fo ' the law — ■ fet upon him, and killed him ; and by this means 1 was the juftice of God fully fatisfied, his wrath appeafed, and all ' true believers acquitted from all their fins,' &c. The next pafiage quoted by the AfTembly is p. 119. * The Fa- ' ther hath made a deed of gift and grant unto all mankind, that ' whofoever of them all fhall believe in his Son, fhall not perifh, * ifc. i. e. (whofoever believes or is perfuaded that Chrift is his, * for this muft be the fenfe, according to the former pafTages.) * Hence it was that Chrift faid to his difciples, Go a/zd preach the 1 g°fp e ^ t0 e *very creature under heaven ; that is, go and tell every 1 man without exception, that here is good news for him, Chrifl is ' dead for him* The author adds, and if he will take him and ac- cept of his righteoufnefs, he ft, hall have him. Here the author brings in * The AfTembly condemned the doctrine of that book, under fix general heads, «tf« I. Concerning the nature of faith. 2. Of univerfal atonement and pardon. 3. Holinefs not necefTarv U> falvation. 4. Fear of punifhment and hope of reward, — not allowed to be motives of a believer's obedience, 5. That the believer is not under the law, as a* rule of life. 6. The fix Antinomian paradoxes. ASl concerning the BoSlrine of Grace. 1 7 in the fimilitude of a good king, caufing a proclamation to be made through his whole kingdom, that all rebels and banifned men mall fafely return home, becaufe, at the fuit and defert of fome dear friend of theirs, it hath pleafed the king to pardon them. ' Cer- * tainly (fays the author) none of thefe rebels ought to doubt, but * hejhall obtain true pardon for this rebel/ton, and fo return home, * and live under the ihadow of that gracious king.* Then follows the quotation of the AfTembly, * even fo our good King, the Lord ' of Heaven and earth, hath for the obedience and defert of our * good brother Jefus Chrift, pardoned all our fins.' It is added by the author, * and made a proclamation throughout the whole world, * that every one of us may fafely return to God, in Jefus Chrift:. * Wherefore (fays he) I befeech you make no doubt of it, but draw ' near with a true heart infullajfurance offiith, Heb. x. 22.' The AfTembly likewife quote p. 127, 128, where the author is exhort- ing and encouraging lingers, to come to Chrift or believe in him, notwithstanding of their fins and the aggravations of them, from the Scriptures, This is a faithful faying and worthy of all acceptation, th^i Chrift fefas came into the world to fave Jinners ; the whole need not a phyfician, but they that arejick ; he came not to call the righte- ous, but fnners to repentance. The AfTembly's judgment upon the above pafTages, is as follows. * Here is afterted an univerfal re- * demption as to purchafe, contrary to 'John x. 10. 15, 27, 28, 29* f and xv. 13. and xvii. T'itus ii. 14. Corf. chap. iii. § 6. chap. viii. * §. 8. Larger Cat. Ch 59.' There is nothing in the above paffages, that in the leaft counte- nances univerfal redemption as to purchafe, a docfrine vhich the Prcfbytery rejects and condemns, as contrary to the Scriptures, and places of our Confeflion and Catechifms quoted by the AfTembly. Nor can the author of the Marrow be juflly cenfured for venting any fuch error; for he plainly teacheth, through the whole of his be ok, that Chrift reprefented, and fiuTered for none but the elect , as/>. 108. * Chrift put himfelf in the room and place of all the faithful ;' by which he underftands the eleft, as he exprefsly declares in the firil fentence of his preface, ' J^fus Chrift, the fecond Adam, did, as £ 1 common perfon, enter into covenant with God his Father, for all ' the elec~t that is to fay fays he) all thofe that have or fhaii be* * lieve on his name,' whereas the U ni 75* That he would grant unto us, that we being delivered " out of the hands of our enemies, might ferve him without fear, " in holinefs and righteoufnefs before him^all the days of our life : M And to our ConfeJJlon of Faith, chap. xii. * All thofe that are * juftified, God vouchfafeth, to make partakers of the ' grace of adoption : By which they inherit the promifes, a& 4 heirs of everlafting falvation. Chap. xiv. § 2. The principal * a6ls of faving faith are, accepting, receiving, and refting upon * Chrift alone for eternal life, by virtue of the covenant of grace? comparing the Scripture-proof there adduced, Atls xv. 11. But we Jfdieve, that through the grate of the Lord Jefus Chrzfl we Ji hall he Sated, 44 -dtt concerning the DoSlrine of Grace. Saved, even as they. Co?if. chap. xx. feci. i. * The liberty which * Chrift hath purchafed for believers, confifts in their yielding ? obedience unto him, not out of jlavi/Jj fear, but a child-like love f and willing mind.' From thefe and the like Scriptures and paflages of the Confeffion it evidently appears, That true fpiritual obedience flows from, and is influenced by faith's view of the love of Chrift ; catting out that fear of wrath and punifhment which necefTarUy hath torment in it ; " ifohn iv. 1 8. There is no fear in love •, but perfect love cafteth " out fear : Becaufe fear hath torment. Verfe 19. We love him f becaufe he firft loved us. Pfal. xxvi. 3. Thy loving kindnefs is " before mine eyes : And I have walked in thy truth :" And, that on the other hand, it is not influenced b}^ any fervile legal hope of reward, or any view of a legal or /tv&rtf/ connection between the obedience and the enjoyment or pofTemon of the inheritance, which is by promife alone. Neither is there the leaf! countenance given to the oppofite doctrines, by thefe Scriptures, where the everlafting in- heritance is expreffed under the notion or by the title of reward -, feeing this reward (being infinite) can only be purchafed by an in- finite price, even that price given by Emmanuel : And this reward is declared to be given to us, not of debt, but of grace ; not to him that worketh, but to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that juftifieth the ungodly ; and to be the gift of God through Jefus Chrift our Lord. Thus, the believer, in his refpect to this recom- pence of reward, is called to act, not for life as the reward of his fervice, but from the faith of his certain enjoyment of that life as the reward of the fervice of the new Covenant-head ; and the more he thus views it, the more fhould and will he be animated to cheer- ful obedience. Wherefore the Prefbytery, for the necefiary vindication of truth, manifeftly injured by the faid acts of AfTembly, did, and hereby do, ajfert, maintain and declare, 1. That it is a precious gofpel-truth, That believers, being heirs of the heavenly inheritance, and having it not by the law, but by free promife, through Jefus Chrift ; ought not to be influenced in their obedience, by the hopes of obtaining the porTeffion and en- joyment of the inheritance, by any works, of rightecufnels or obe- dience done by them. 1. That, as they ftmuld be moved to obedience from the con- sideration of the excellency of the heavenly inheritance, even of God in Chrifl as their inheritance and exceeding great reward, and by many other motives ; fo, particularly, they are to be influenced by this motive, That they have got the begun porTef- fion of this inheritance, and have the full poffeilion thereof fecured, by rich grace and free promife, through Jefus Chrift -, being made heirs of God, and joint -heirs iuiih Chrifl. 3. That, though the believer ought to entertain an holy awe and dread of the majefty of God, and of the awfulnefs of his fhreatenings and judgments, both temporal and eternal, againft fin , and Aci concerning the Doclrine of Grace. 45 and finners ; and to confider from them what even his fins in them- felves deferve : Yet, he is not called to be moved or excited to obedience to the precepts of the law (either as it is a Covenant of Works, or as it is a Rule of Life) by the fear of his falling into hell, for omitting duty or committing fin : But is ever called fully to believe his infallible fecurity from going down into that pit, through the ranfom which God has found out ; fo as through the firm and lively faith of this his fafety in a State of favour with God, to have his heart more and more filled with that love which cafteth out tormenting fear, and will be natively exercifed in chearful gofpel-obedience to all the Lord's commandments. 4. That, though believers ihould remember and ferioufly con- fider, that there is difcipline in their Father's family ; and believe that they may expecl it, when they tranfgrefs his law, and keep not his commandments : Yet, as this difcipline is instituted on account of remaining corruption in them -, fo, the consideration thereof ought to excite them more and more to improve the blood of Jefus Chrifi by faith, for draining and mortifying this corruption ; and particu- larly, for fubduing and removing the legal bias and difpofition, which is the Strength of fin in them ; that thus, they may be more and more made to ferve in newnefs of fpirit, and not in the old- nefs of the letter. And the PreSbytery do, in like manner, condemn the following pofitions, as dangerous, unfound and erroneous : 1. That there is a legal conneclion inftituted, between the obe- dience of believers, and their enjoying rewards, with efcaping pu- nishments, temporal or eternal ; or, that the Lord deals with them in this matter upon Law terms ; and that their hopes of enjoying the one, and efcaping the other, are to rife and fall according to the meafure of their obedience. 2. That a perfon's being moved to obedience by the hope of heaven, cannot be faid to be mercenary, in any other fenfe than that of a hope of obtaining a right and title to it, by his own works : And, that a believer ought to be moved to obedience, or, to ef- chew evil and do good, by the hopes of his enjoying heaven, or any good temporal or eternal, by his own obedience, as the federal, conditional mean, and caufe thereof. All which pofitions are contrary to the above-cited, and many other Scriptures and paf- fages in our Standards. Article V. [Of the injury done to the Doclrine of Grace,] under this Head, 'That the Believer is not under the Law as a Rule of Life. The ASTembly 1720, attempting to prove againfl the Author of the Marrow, his maintaining the forefaid error, viz. 'That the believer is not under the Law as a Rule of Life, relate fome paSTages out of his book, and then cite a number of pages. The paflages related are three ; the laft whereof, together with the pages only cited, not being again repeated in the Act 1722, we Shall confider them 4.6 Act concerning the Doctrine of Grace. them in the Jirji place. The third paffage then in abl 1720, is ta- ken from p. 216. of the book, vfas. * You will yield obedience to ' the law of Chrift, not only without having refpect to what the * law of works either promifeth or threateneth ; but alfo without * having refpecl: to what the law of Chriji either promifeth or * threateneth : And this is to ferve the Lord without fear of any pe- * nalty which either the law of works or the law of Chrift threatens. * Luke i. 74.' This being the paffage that affords the Affembly the moft plaufible pretence for charging the Author with main- taining, That the believer is not under the law as a rule of life, it is eafy to fee how ftraitened they were to prove their point, and how impracticable it was for them to do fo, without doing injury to truth. For this paffage relates not properly to obedience, but to the motives of the believer's obedience ; and fo it belongs to, and is noticed upon another head. But, as here it is adduced to prove, that the Author denies the believer to be under the law as a rule of life, it feems to be very far from anfwering that end. For, in the paffage itfelf, the Author is owning, that the believer mould yield obedience to the law : And though it could be proven, that he is unduly cutting off all regard to the promife or threatening ; yet, while he is not rejecting the co?nmand, but maintaining the regard the believer ought to have thereunto, and owning the obli- gation he is under to yield obedience ; the faid paffage will never prove his maintaining that the believer is not under the law as a rule of life, but the quite contrary ; fince here his fcope is not to fpeak of the law, but the* fa?iclion, and to fhew what a pure re- gard the believer ought to have to the command, though promifes and threatenings both were cut off, and confequently to the law it- felf, as a rule of life. But the wrong done to the Author, by at- tempting (though in vain) to prove the forefaid error againft him, were the lefs to be noticed, if, at the fame time, the moft precious gofpel-truths were not wronged and wounded, as appeareth in what follows. The Affembly 1720, on the fame head, cite pages 5, 153, 180, 156, 157, 163, 199, 209, 210, of the Marrow, as alfo proving againft the Author, his denying the law to be a rule of life to the believer ; and both there, and in the clofe of the Act, they condemn thefe paffages, as contrary to the holy Scriptures, and our Confeffion of Faith. But, as it would be tedious, and is needlefs, to repeat here the paffages contained in thefe pages ; fo, any that pleafe to confult them, may not only fee how egregioufly the Author is wronged by that Act, but alfo may be filled with aftonifh- ment to behold, how far the General Affembly of the Church of Scotland has been left of God, to condemn fo many precious truths^ manifeftly founded on the Word of God, and moft agreeable to *>ur Confeftion of Faith and Catechifms. But farther, the Affembly 1720, pretending to prove againft the Author of the Marrow, his maintaining the forefaid error, viz. ^hat the believer is not tinder the law m a rule of life ; are fo far from ASt Concerning the Doclrine of Grace. 47 from doing it, that, for proof, they cite and condemn thefe words, page 250. As the law is the Covenant of Works, you are wholly and. altogether fet free from it ; and page 151. Ton are now fet free both from the commanding and condemning power of the Cove- nant of Works. Thefe words, fays the Affembly 1722, * are con- * defcended upon as a part of the proof againlt the Author, of his * maintaining this erroneous tenet, That the believer is not under c the law as a rule of life;' and then they declare, * that it was ' not the meaning nor intention of the faid Acl, in the leaft to in- 1 finuate, that Believers in Chrijl are under the law as a Covenant of * Works, or that they are obliged to feek jujlif cation by their own ' obedience. And, the Affembly appoints, that thefe two (fore- ' faid) pajfages Jhall not he underjiood as a proof of the forefaid er- * ror, in any other fenfe, than as, the Affembly did apprehend, that * the Author underftood by the Covenant of Works, the Moral Laio 1 jlri&ly and properly taken, as it appears he does (fay they) in ' other places of the book ; as particularly, page 7. he fays, That * indeed the law of works fgnifies the Moral Law ; and the Moral Law 1 jlri&ly and properly taken, Jignifies the Covenant of Works.* Now, the injury which by all this is done to truth, appears in the fol- lowing particulars : (1.) They find fault with the Marrow for afferting, that the Moral Law is ftrictly and properly the Covenant of Works, and that as fuch, the believer is wholly and altogether fet free from it •, as if his fpeaking in this manner did afford any proof of his maintain- ing that the believer is not under the law as a rule of life : Where- as, in our Larger Catechifm, queft. 93. What is the Moral Law ? The anfwer given is a ftricl: and proper definition of the Covenant of Works, from which the faid Catechifm, in anfwer to queft. 97. afferts, that believers are delivered, fo as thereby they are neither juflified nor condemned ; which is the fame, in other words, with their being neither under the command of it to be juflified, nor under the threatening of it to be condemned thereby. Hence, the Affembly by that a&, inftead of fixing the forefaid error upon the Author of the Marrow, have but further condemned the truth as expreffed both in that book and in our Catechifm ; pretending that the gofpel-doclrine, delivered in that ftrain, tends fome way or other to loofenefs, or to loofe the believer from his obligation to the law as a rule of life. (2.) As they charge an erroneous fenfe upon the Marrow, with- out being able to prove it ; fo, their own wrong fenfe and errone- ous opinion upon this matter, is too evident in that a& ; as there- in they make thefe two propofitions to be one and the fame, viz. That believers in Chrijl are not under the Law as a Covenant of Works, and, That they are not obliged to feek jujlif cation by their own obedience, Thefe two propofitions they make alternatives, and of the fame im- port : But, if they be the fame, then the believer is no otherwife freed from the Covenant of Works after he is a believer, than he trxs before when m znbelief; for then, he was as little obliged to feek 48 Acl concerning the Doclrine of Grace. feek justification by his own obedience, as he is now ; and confe- quently, he Was as much delivered from the Law as a Covenant of Works, before he believed as face. Yea, according to this errone- ous polition, the believer is no more delivered from the Law, as a Covenant of Works, than the unbeliever, who is as little obliged to feek justification by his own obedience as the believer is. Here then is a grofs perverting of the truth, relating to the command of the Law as a Covenant of Works ; of which our leSTer Catechifm fpeaks in this maniier, When God created man, he entered into a Co- venant of Life with him, upon condition of perfect obedience : For, inStead of this, the form of that Covenant is altered by the faid act of Aflembly, from man's being obliged to perfeB obedience, which was the condition of that Covenant, and of life by it, to his being obliged to feek life andjujlification by his obedience •, which is not at all the proper form of the Covenant of Works, but a confe- quence from it, and fuch, as the Covenant of Works might have been fulfilled without regarding it. F or, by feeking, here muft be understood either aiming at, or claimizig justification by our own obedience: But now, if Adam had performed that perfect obedi- ence therein required, he would have been juftified, though he had never fought or aimed at his own juflif cation by it, but merely aimed at the glory of God his creator ; and though he was to have life by or for his obedience, yet he could never feek or claim life and justification by it, till once he had performed it perfectly. So dangerous then, is the altering the words of our Standards by any fuch untenable glofs, that this in particular will be found full of grofs error. For, if believers in Chrift their not being un- der the Law as a Covenant of Works, is the very fame with their not being obliged to feek juflif cation by their own obedience; it will •plainly follow, that all the children of men now, efpecially fuch as are under the outward difpenfation of the gofpel, are delivered from the command of the Law as a Covenant of Works, equally with the believer, becaufe none of them are obliged to feek justification by their own obedience : And if they be not under the command of the Covenant of Works, how can they be under the curfe of it ? "Where no Law is, there is no tranfgrefjion, and where no tranfgrcf- flon, there is no penalty : Moreover, where none of thefe are, there is no need of Chrifi v s obedience, either active or pamve in their room, and fo no need of a preached gofpel : This new way then which the Affembly takes to explain the old truth, tends to deftroy both Law and Gofpel. But it is plain, that though the Law or Covenant of Works be a broken, yet it is a perpetually bindhig Law; and though the finner be an hifolvent debtor, yet the debt, both of obedience and fatisfa&ion, lies upon his head, as long as he is under the Law, and not under Grace, through union to Chrift the fecond Adam, ' who came to pay that double debt ; from which believers in Chrift are alone free, through the imputation of his Law-fulfilling and Ju- ftice-fatisfying Righteoufhefs unto them. - The AEl concerning the DoSlrine of Grace. 49 The proper form of the commanding power of the Law, as a Co- venant of Works, lies in the connection between perfo?ial obedience and eternal life : And this connection flill Hands in that Law under which the unbeliever keeps himfelf by his unbelief; which there- fore Hill binds him, both under the forfeiture of life which the Law promifed, and under an obligation, to that obedience which had this life promifed to it. This keeps all the lapfed race of Adam un- der an obligation, not to feek juftincation by their own obedi- ence, but to defpair of life and juftincation by the Law, and to expecl death and condemnation by it, according to the fentence thereof panned againfl them, Gal. iii. 10. This ftanding connect tion between (bedience a?id life, and difobedience and death, in that Law of Works which they are under, holds them prifon- ers to the Law and Tuftice of God, as long as their debt to both is not paid. This connection then, makes the unbeliever flill lie under the condemning power and curfe of the Law •, where- as, if he were not flill under the precept, he could not be under the penalty of that Covenant. This alfo makes him need to feek life and juftincation by the obedience of Chrift ; for, if he were not under the forefaid binding obligation of the Law, both as to the do and die of it, he would not need to feek juftincation to life, nor falvation from death, by the doing and dying, the obe- dience and fatisfa&ion of Jefus ChriJL But, the acl: of AfTembly 1722, does fo much cloud and darken this truth, that it plainly fup- pofes none are under the Law as a Covenant of Works, except thefe that are under an obligation to feek juftincation by their own obe- dience : And this being an obligation none at all are under, whether believers or unbelievers, the common and valuable privilege of cdl the hearers of the gofpel, in their being obliged to feek juftincation only through the obedience and fatisfaction of Jefus Chrift, is thus quite fiibv tried, and at the fame time, the great diftinguifhing pri- vilege of believers, in being not under the Law but .under Grace, is by this aft, quite overthrown and turned to nothing. The faid AJembly owns, in their acl:, that it is a precious go- fpel -truth, That believers are free from the Law as it is a Covenant of Works : And hence, fome may allege that it is a ftrained confe- quence, from their alternative, viz. That they are not obliged to feek juflifi cation by their own obedience, to infer their deflroying the be- liever's privilege, and making him no happier than the unbeliever. But, that their meaning is not wrefled, is plain from their condemn- ing, in the fame a£t the following pofition, viz. That the Law, as to believers, is really divejled of its promife of life and threatening of death : For hence it is evident, that they keep the believer both un- der the commanding and condemning power of the Law, equally with the unbeliever: Becaufe if the Law, as to the believer, be not really divefled of its Promife of eternal life ; then the 'i eliever is under the commanding power thereof, fo that his obedience as fuch, hath the promife of life : An thus, he muft have another Law -title to life and eternal falvation, th n Chrift's obedience. And, if the Law, as to the believer, be not really divefled of its threatening of G death ,* jo Ail concerning the 'Doclrine of Grace* death ; then, the believer is under the condemning power thereof, fo as his fin and difobedience, even after he is in a juftified ftate, brings him under a legal obnoxioufnefs to eternal death : Wherefore, by his obedience he muft have a right to life and justification, accord- ing to the Law ; and by his difobedience, he mult come under con- demnation and death, according tot he fame Law : And co.riequent- ly, he is not at all delivered from the Law as a Covenant of Works; fo as to be thereby neither juftified nor condemned : Which is di- rectly contradictory, both to the Scriptures of truth, and to our Confeflion of Faith and Catechifms. This doclrine is not cnly highly injurious to the revelation of the grace of God, concerning the believer's privilege ; but it is alfo difhonouring and difcrediting to the righteoufnefs of Chrift our Surety : While, notwithstanding his doing, upon which alone the believer's legal title to eternal life Hands, and his dying, upon which alone his legal fecurity from eternal death ftands \ yet, the believer, by this corrupt doclrine, is kept both under the do and die of the Covenant of Works : Under the do, bccaufe the Law hath Hill the promiie of life, even as to him, and the die, becaufe the Law hath ftill the threatening of death, even as to him : And fo he hath neither legal fecurity for life by Chrift's doing, nor legal fecurity againft death by Chrift's dying. Thus, by this act of AfTembly, the believer is condemned to remain ftill under that old Law, If thou doejl, thoufbalt live, and, if thou doefi ?iot, thoujhalt die ; not- withftanding all that Chrift hath clone and fullered for him. It will not falve the matter that the AfTcmbly adds, after the forefaid condemnatory words, thefe following, viz. If by the Law they underfiand the Moral Law, the Rule of Life. For as this, when connected with "the forefaid condemned pclition, feems imintclli- gible ; fo, if it have any meaning at all, it muft import their making the Moral Law, as it is a Rule of Life to the believer, to have a jyromife of life and a threatening of death ; or to be a Law giving life to them upon their obedience, and denouncing death and damnation to them upon their difobedience : Which feems a turning the Go- i'pel to a Law ; or the Law, as a Rule of Life in the hand of Chrift, to a Law or Covenant cf IV oris, fpeaking life to the doer, and death to the tranfgrefTor : And fo the matter comes ftill to the lame iffiie, though they would feem here to explain what they con- demn. And that the believer, according to the Aftembly, is fall kept under the Law, as a Covenant of Works, will further appear, if it is confidered ; that, though they feem to deny, that believers in Chrift are under the Law as a Covenant of Works •, yet, while they alfert, that the Law as a Rule of Life, which the believer is under, is a Law that is not diverted of a promife of life, and a threatening of death, (which, according to our Confeifion, is the proper notion of the Law, as a Covenant cf Works-,) they likewife maintain, that holy obedience is properly a federal or conditional mean, and has feme kind of caufality ', in order to the obtaining of gloiy : From which At~i concerning the Doclrine of Grace, 51 which it plainly follows, that believers are ftill kept under the Co- vena/it of Works ; in regard that, according to them, the believer's obedience has ftill the promife of life, and his difobedrence the threatening of death ; and in regard they likewife make th,eir holy obedience to be properly a federal or conditional mean, in or- der to their obtaining eternal glory. But, whatever Law they will have the believer under, as a Law of life or death, it is plain that the believer is under no fuch Law ; feeing, as the Apoftle fays, Gal. iii. 18, 21, 22. If the inheritance be of the Law, it is no more of pro- mife For, if there had been a Law given which could have gi- ven life, verily righteonfnefs Jhould have been by the Law : But the Scripture hath concluded all under fn ; that the promife, by faith of fefus Chrif, might be given to them that belieie. Therefore the Prefbytery did, and hereby do, acknowledge, ajfert and declare, in cppolition to thefe forefaid ac~fo of Aifembly 1720, and 1722, upon this head : (1.) That, whatever the Law, as a Covenant of Works, promi- feth or threatens, in itfelf, and as to them that are under it; yet the Law, as to the believer, is really divefied of the promife of life and threatening of death : And that the believer holds his legal right and claim to eternal life, only by the peifocl obedience of Chrijl to the Law in his room; and hi; legal iecurity from eternal death, only by the complete Saiisfaf/ion of Chrijl to the Juftice of God, in the threatening of the Law ; and not by any Law having pro- mife of life to his own obedience, or threatening of death to his difobedience : For, zvherefn abounded, grace did much more abound ; that as fin hath reigned unto death, even fo might grace reign through righteonfnefs unto eternal life, by j'efus Chrijl our Lord, Rom. v. 20, 21. (2.) That, as the Moral Law doth for ever bind all, as well juf- tified perfons as others, to the obedience thereof: So, to affert that the Moral Law, ilrielly and properly considered, as a Covenant of Works, is what the believer is wholly ajtd altogether ft free from, will never prove agoinft the afferter thereof, that he main- tains the believer is not under the Law as a Rule of Life. And, to the fame purpofe, the Pre&ytery maintain, That as the Law is a Covenant of Works, believers are wholly and altogether fet free from it, fet free both from the commanding and condci?ining power there- of; or, as our Larger Catechifm exprefTes it, delivered from the Mo-* ral Law as a Covenant of 'Works, fo as thereby they are neither jujlifi- cd nor condemned : And that, from the maintaining of this truth, it will no ways follow, that the believer is not under the Law as a rule of life. (3.) That, though it be the duty of all who hear the gofpel, to feek after life and putin* cation by the obedience of Chrift, and not by their own ; yet, while through unbelief they do not fo, they re- main under the Law as a Covena?it if Works, both in its commanding and condemning power ; and that it is the peculiar privilege of true believers in Chrifl, to be free therefrom. (4-) 52 Acv concerning the Dotlrine of Grace. (4.) That, though all unbelievers do remain under the Law as a Covenant of Works, both in its commanding and condemning pow- er ; yet r.one of them are obliged to feek j unification by their own obedience ; but on the contrary, it is the great duty of all the hear- ers of the gofpel, and alfo their ineftirnable privilege, to feek juflifi- cation only through the obedience and fatisfaction of Chrift. And the Prefbytery do hereby likewife condemn thefe following pofitions, which are countenanced by the forefaid acts of AfTembly upon this head. (1.) That the doctrine of the believer's . being freed from the Law as a Covenant of Works, whether in its commanding or con- demning power, is a doctrine of licentioufnefs \ tending any way to free the believer from obligation to the Law, as it is a rule of life. Do we make void the lazv through faith ? God forbid ; yea, we cjla- blifh the law. (2.) That the believer his not being under the Law, and his not being obliged to feek life by his own obedience, are propofltions of the fame import ; as if unbelievers, under a gofpel-difpenfation, were equally Tree from the commanding power of the Law, as a Covenant of Works, with believers ; fince they are not obliged to feek juftin- cation by their own obedience any more than believers. The PrePoytery, therefore co?idemn this doctrine, as highly prejudicial to the truth relating both to the Law, and the Gofpel ; and to the dijlingui/hhig privilege of the believer in Chrift, his being not un- der the Law but under Grace. (3.) That the Law, as to believers, is veiled with a promife of life and threatening of death ; fo as their obedience is properly a federal or conditional mean, in order to their obtaining eternal glory. (4.) That unbelievers, in their being under the Law as a Cove- nant of Works, are obliged to feek juflification by their own obe- dience. All which pofitions are injurious to truth, and oppofite to the Scriptures and our Ccnfefuon of Faith and Catechifms. Article VI. Concerning the Injury done to the Doctrine of Grace, under the Head of (what the AfTembly calls} Thefx Antinomian Paradoxes. The AfTembly, in their aforefaid act, anno 1720, condemn the diflinction which the Author of the Marrow makes ufe of, for rid- ding marches between the ftate of an unbeliever, who is condemned already by the fentence of the broken Law, and the flate of a be- liever, for whom there is no condemnation ; and for mewing, in what fenfe the believer in Chrift is bound to obey the Law, and in what fenfe he is delivered from it. The Author, for this purpofe, diftinguifheth between the Law as it is the Law of Works, which he explains to be the Law confidered as a Covenant of Works ; and the Law as it is the Law of Chrift '; by which he underftands the Law confidered as a rule of obedience in Jcl concerning the Dodlrine of Grace. 53 in the hand of Chrift, who hath as their Surety, fulfilled the righ- teoufnefs of the Law, as a Covenant, in their room and ftead. For what reafon the AfTembly condemns this diftintftion, it is hard to conceive. Can it be thought, that an AfTembly of the Church of Scotland^ denies any difference between the Law as a Co- venant of Works, and the Law as a Rule of Duty ? If this foundation be deftroyed, What can the righteous do, who falleth feven times a- day? For, according to this doctrine, when he falls into any, even the leaf! fin, he falls under, and becomes liable unto the heavy fen- tence of the Law of Works, Curfed is every one that continueth not in all things 'written in the book of Law to do them. The reafon is plain, becaufe, according to the AfTembly 's act, the Law, even with refped to the believer, frill retains its Covenant form ; con- trary to Scripture, Rom. vi. 14. Rom. vii. 2, 3, 4. and to the Con- fellion of Faith, chap. xix. § 6. The AfTembly, in the condemnation of this diflin&ion, do, Jim- pliciter, condemn fix propofitions, called by them, Anti?iomian Pa- radoxes ; the mofr of which are the exprefs words of the Holy Ghoft in Scripture, and fo mult needs have a found fenfe. If the AfTembly had dealt with that candour, which might have been ex- pected from a court of Chrift, they would have told in what fenfc the Author admits, and in what fenfe he re/ecls thefe propofitions 1 But, feeing the AfTembly has neglected this, it is proper to take a view thereof in the words of the Author, pages 198, 199, 200, 201, 202, 203. There, Neophytus craves of Evangeli/la, his judgment concern- ing the following propofitions: (1.) That a believer is not under the Law, but is altogether delivered from it; (2.) "That a believer doth not commit Jin ; (3.) That the Lord can fee no Jin in a believer > (4.) Th at the Lord is ?iot a?igry with a believer for his Jins ; (5.) That the Lord doth not chaftife a believer fir his Jins ; (6.) 'That a believer hath no caufe, neither to cojifefs his Jins, nor to crave pardon at the hands of God for them ; neither yet to fajl, nor mourn, nor humble himf elf before the Lord for them. Unto this Evangeli/la anfwers, in the words following ; ' Thefe * points, which you have now mentioned, have occafioned many need- * lefs and fruitlefs difputes ; for, in one fenfe, they may all of * them be truly affirmed ; and, in another fenfe, they may all of ' them be truly denied. Wherefore, if we would clearly underfland ' the truth, we muft diftinguiih betwixt the Law as it is the Law * of Works, and as it is the Law of Chrift. Now, as it is the Law ' of Works, it may be truly faid, That a believer is not under the * Law, but is delivered from it, according to that of the Apoftle, ' Rom. vi. 14. Ye are not under the Law, but under Grace ; and * Rom. vii. 6. But now we are delivered from the Law. And if * believers be not under the Law, but are delivered from the Law, * as it is a Law of Works, then, though they fin, yet do they not tranf- * grefs the Law of Works ; For where no Law is, there is no tranf- 1 grejfion, Rom* iv. 15. And therefore, faith the Apoftle John, Who- * foever 54 . Aft concerning the Doclrine of Grace. foever ahideth in him Jinneth not, I John iii. 6. that is (as I con- ceive) whofoever abideth in Chrift by faith, finneth not againft the Law of Works. And, if a believer iin not againft the Law of Works, then can God fee no lin in a believer, as a tranfgreilion of that Law ; and therefore it is faid, Numb, xxiii. 21. He hath not beheld iniquity hi Jacob, neither hath he Jeen perverfenefs in Ifrael. And again it is faid, Jer. 1. 20. At that time the iniquity of lir&elf j a// be fought for ', and there jh all be none ; and the Jins of Judah, and they Jh all not be found : And in Cant. iv. 7. Chrift faith concerning his Spoufe, Behold thou art all fair ; my Love ; and there is no f pot in thee. And if God can fee no lin in a be- liever, then aiTuredly he is neither angry, nor doth chaftife a be- liever for his fins, as a tranfgreiTion of that Law : And hence it is, that the Lord faith, concerning his own people, that were be- lievers, 1/a. xxvii. 4. Anger is not in me; and again LJa. liv. 9. the Lord fpeaking comfortably to his Spoufe the Church, faith, As L have /worn, that the waters cf Noah fhall no more go over the earth ; fo have Lfworn, that L will no more be wroth with thee, nor rebuke thee. Now, if the Lord be not angry with a believer, neither doth chaftife him for his fins, as they are any tranfgrefhon of the Law of Works ; then hath a bjliever neither need to con- ffs his lins unto God, nor to crave pardon for them, nor yet to faji nor mourn, nor humble himfelf fcr them, as conceiving them to be any tranfgreilion of the Law, as it is the Law of Works. Thus, you fee, that if you confider the Law in this fenfe, then all thefe points follow ; according as you fay our friend Antinoniifta hath endeavoured to perfuade you. * Eut if you doconlider the Law, as it is the Law of Chrift, then they do not fo. but quite contrary. For, as the Law is the Law of Chrift, it may be truly faid, that a believer is under the Law, and not delivered from it, according to that of the Apoftle, 1 Cor. ix. 21. Being not without Law to God, but under the Law to Chnjl ; and according to that of the fame Apoftle, Rom. iii. 31. l)c zee then make void the Law through faith ? God forbid ; yea, (by faith) we ejlablifh the Law. And if a believer be under the Law, and not delivered from it, as it is the Law of Chrift •, then, if he fin, he doth thereby tranfgrefs the Law of Chrift : And hence I do conceive it is, that the Apoftle John faith, both concerning him- felf and other believers. 1 John i. 8. Lf we fay we have no Jin, we deceive ourfelves, and the truth is not in us : And lo faith the A- poftle Jajnes, chap. iii. 2. Ln many things we offend all. And if a believer tranfgrefs the Law of Chrift, then doubtlefs, he feeth it ; for it is faid, Prov. v. 21. That the ways of man are before the eyes of the Lord, and he po?idercth all his goings : And in Heb. iv. 13. it is faid, All things are naked and opened unto the eyes of him with whom we have to do. And if the Lord doth fee the fins that a believer doth commit againft the Law, as it is the Law of Chrift, then doubtlefs, lie is angry with them ; for it is faid, Pfal. cvi. 40. That becaufe the people vceni a whoring after their own inventions, 1 there- Ac~i concerning the Doclrine of Grace. 55 ' therefore was the wrath of the Lord kindled againjl his people, info * much that he abhorred his own inheritance: And in Deut. i. 37. * Mofes faith concerning himfelf, The Lord was angry with him. 1 And if the Lord be angry with a believer for his tranfgreiling the ' Law of Chrift, then alTuredly (if need be) he will chaflife him « for it } for, it is faid, concerning the feed and children of Jefus * Chrift, If they forfake my Law, and walk not i?i my judgments, 4 then will I vijit their tranfgrefjions with the rod, and their iniqui- 1 ties with fir ipes : And, in 1 Cor. xi. 30. it is faid, concerning be- * lievers,ybr this caufe (namely their unworthy receiving of the * Sacrament) many are weak andjickly among you, and many feep. 4 And if the Lord be angry with believers, and do chaflife them * for their fins, as they are a tranfgreftion of the Law of Chrift ; * then hath a believer caufe to confefs his fins unto the Lord, and 1 to crave pardon for them ; yea, and to faft, and mourn and bum- 6 hie himfelf for them, as conceiving them to be a tranfgrefiion of * the Law of ' Chrift.' From the above quotation it is plain, like a fun-beam, in what fenfe the fix propofitions called A?itinomian, are either true or fa If e, according to the Author ; and how neceffary the above diftinclion, of the Law into the Law of Works and the Law of Chrifl, is, for clearing the true fenfe of the above propofitions, which are moftly fcriptural. But, the AfTembly, by condemning the above diftinc- tion, have overclouded many precious truths; which cannot mifs to iffue in a jumbling Law and Gofpel together, and the bringing of believers under a lpirit of bondage unto fear, from which they are delivered by the grace and fpirit of the gofpel. Neither have the AfTembly, in their explicatory acl, 1722, of- fered any thing of moment, either fcr the clearing up of truth, or for their own neceffary vindication ; as will appear if we confider, (1.) That the Author of the Marrow, page 267, cited by the acl of AfTembly 1722, page 23, head vi. is there fpeaking of the diftinc- tion betwixt Law and Gofpel ftriclly taken, both which have their proper ufes, even to the believer ; but he is not fpeaking one word of the believer's not being, in any fenfe, under the Law of Works, or of his being under any Law. (2.) The AfTembly, in their faid acl, 1722, for their own exoneration, fay, that the AfTembly 1720, do only condemn the above diftinclion of the Law, into the Law of Works and the Law of Chrift, as it is applied by the Author, (viz. of the Marrow,*) for defending the fix Antino?nian Paradoxes : From whence it neceffarily follows, that thefe fix points of doctrine are condemned by the AfTembly, according to the fenfe put upon them, by the Author's applying to them that diftinclion of the Law, into the Law of Works, and the Law of Chrijl ; or, as the Author ex- plains himfelf, the Law as a Covenant and the Law as a Rule of Obe- dience. And thus, thefe following precious truths of the everlafting Gofpel, lie buried under the condemnatory fentence of the General AfTembly of this National Church, for above twenty years back- ward. 56 Ac~l concerning the Doclrine of Grace. if, That believers are not under the Law as a Covenant, but are altogether freed from it ; though they are flill under it as a Rule of Obedience. idly, That a believer doth not commit fin, as it is a tranfgreihon of the Law of Works ; but, when he lins, he tranfgreneth the Law, confidered as a Rule of Holinefs in the hand of a Mediator. $dly, That God fees no iin in a jultified believer, under the co- Tert of the perfect righteoufnefs of Chrifl, as a trarifgrellion of the Law of Works ; though he Hill fees and marks it, as a tranfgreihon of the Law ofCbrift. qtbly, That the Lord is not angry with a believer for his fins, with a vindiclive wrath ; but with a fatherly difpleafure. $thly, That the Lord doth not chaitife a believer for his fins, as an implacable enemy, with Law-vengeance ,• but with the rod of a Father, not for their deflru&ion but for their reformation. 6thly, That though the fins of believers, coniidered as tranfgref- iions of the Law or Covenant of Works, do deferve eternal death ; and though they are even many ways aggravated above the fins of others : Yet, feeing their fins, coniidered as tranfgreflions of the Law or Covenant of Works, were laid over upon Chrifl ; therefore a believer, when he fajls and mourns for, and confejfeth his fins, ought to view them as laid over upon the Surety, purging away their guilt by his blood : And, in the faith of remiliion and for- givenefs through the righteoufnefs of Chrifl, and of his deliverance from the commanding and condemning power of the Law of "Works, thereby ; he is to fafl and mourn for, and confefs his fins, as to his concern with them in his juflified eflate, not as violations of the Law of Works, but only as violations of the Law in the band of a Mediator, and, as committed againfl, and dishonouring unto his reconciled God and Father in Chrifl. Thus, by the doctrine of the forefaid acl, the foundation of all evangelical obedience is overturned, — the wells of Salvation, out of which we mould draw water with joy, are ftopt ; and we are fent back to the Law as a Covenant, to feek righteoufnefs, life and com- fort. Wherefore, in order to clear and maintain the foundations of gofpel-obedience, and the fprings of the believer's confolation ; the Prefbytery did, and hereby do, acknowledge, affert and declare, if, That the diflinclion, as explained in the Marrow, is good and fcriptural, viz. That there is a wide difference between the Law as a Covenant of Works, and the Law as a Rule of holy Obe- dience. idly, That a believer in Chrifl, is neither under the command- ing nor condemning power of the Law, as a Covenant of Works ; although he be flill under the Law as a Rule of Obedience in the hand of a Mediator. $dly, That God feeth not iniquity in Jacob, or in true be- lievers, as it is a tranfgreihon of the Covenant of Works ; but only, as it is a tranfgrcfhon of the Law in the hand of Chrifl, who bore .our fins in his own body on the tree. 4 thly 9 A81 concerning the Dotlrine of Grace. 57 ^thly, That though the elec~l, by nature, be children of wrath even as others ; yet, through the death and fatisfa£tion of Chrift, the Lord's vindiclive anger is turned away from, fury is not in him againft any foul that is come to the blood of fprinkling : And yet, he may and will be angry with his dear children, fo as to vifit their iniquity with the rod, and their tranfgrejjions with Jlripes ; but, becaufe he will not take his love from Chrift, nor break his covenant with him, therefore not with them, who are his feed. $thly, That when a believer fajls, mour/is for and confejfeth his fins, he ought not to do it in a legal way, as one ftanding under a Covenant of Works, either as to its precept or penalty ; but he ought to do it with the hand of faith upon the head of the great Sacrifice and Atonement, as one whofe perfon and duties are accepted in the Beloved : And thus he ought tofaft, mourn for and confefs his fins, before his reconciled God and Father ; believing that God, accord- ing to his promife, is merciful to his unrighteoufhefs, and will re- member his fins no more. Moreover, the Prefbytery did, and hereby do, condemn and rejeEl the following erroneous and dangerous pojitions, taught by the Af- fembly : if, That believers are under the Law, and not altogether freed from it, as a Covenant of Works. 2dly, That, when a believer fins, he fins againft the Law of Works, and therefore muft be liable to the penalty thereof. $dfy, That God feeth iniquity in believers, as it is a violation of the old Covenant of Works, made with Adam in innocency ; and consequently, that he fees it with an eye of vindiclive juflice ; notwithftanding the fatisfaction of Chrift, and their being under the covert of his Law-magnifying Righteoufnefs. ^thly, That, when God is angry with believers for their fins, he purfues them upon the footing of the Law of Works ; or, which is the fame thing, with the fame anger wherewith he purfued the Surety, when he was made a curfe for them. $thly, That, when God corrects his children, he does it in his vindiclive or revenging wrath, and not in a way of fatherly chaf- tifement. 6thly, That when a believer fa/is, mourns for, confejfeth, and feeks pardon of fin ; he is to view himfelf, as guilty of the violation of the Law of Works, notwithftanding his being dead to the Law, through faith in Jems ChrifL S E.c T 1 o n III. Concerning the Obligation of Obedience unto the Law, and the Evangelical Grounds thereof. Having thus elTayed to vindicate the BoBrine of the Grace of God, from the injuries done to it by the acls of AJfembly 1720 and 1722 ; and alio, the obligation of the holy Law as a rule of obedi- ence every where aflerted through the foregoing a£t of Preibytery : Yet, becaufe of the ftrong propenfity of corrupt nature, to turn G 'the 58 A61 concerning the Loclrine of Grace. the grace of God into licentioufnefs ; therefore, the Prefbytery judge it expedient to conclude this their acl, by fhewing that the holy Law, as a Rule of Duty is flill obligatory under the gofpel;. yea, that the go/pel yields firoiiger and more powerful incitements to obedience, than any thing which the Law itfelf, abftradtly con- fidered, can afford. Article I. [Concerning the Obligation of Obedience ta the Law. That the holy Law, as a Rule of Duty is flill obligatory under the Gofpel, will appear from feveral confiderations]. And, 1. This will appear from the epithets given unto the Law, un- der the difpenfation of the gofpel. Sometimes it is called the Law of Chrift •, as in Gal. vi. 2. Bear ye one another s burdens, and fo ful- fil the Law of Christ; John xiv. 15. If ye love me, keep my Commandments; 1 Cor. ix. 21. Being not without law to God, but under the Law to Christ : Which expreffions do plainly in- timate, that the Law of the Creator is now iflued forth to us, in the hand of a Mediator ; and that we, in our obedience, are to eye the authority of God in him, becaufe God's name is in him : And indeed, by proclamation from the excellent Glory, we are enjoined to hear him, or to receive the Law from his mouth, as the great Lawgiver and King whom God hath fet upon his holy hill cf Zion. It is agreeably to this, that the Moral Law is called the Royal Law, James ii. 8. For the whole Law, and every article thereof, carries upon it a flamp of the Royal Authority of this King of Saints •, and all the Royal Seed of this great King, have it engraved upon the tables of their hearts, by the power of his Spirit. 2. The Law is given upon Evangelical, and, confequently upon everlafiing grounds, which can never be antiquated or aboliihed ; for Exod. xx. 1, 2. God /pake all thefe words, faying, I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the houfe of bondage. It is worthy of notice here, by what arguments the Lord enforces obedience to the Moral Law : The iirft is, his infinite Grcatnefs and I?7i?nut ability ; he is the great Jehovah, who is being itfelf, and who gives us our being, both in nature and grace ; fo that he has an abfolute fovereignty over us, as the potfherds which his own hand hath made : But this ar- gument alone is fo awful, that it is ready to difmay and drive us finners away from God ; therefore he next draws us under his fweet and gracious government with bands of love, by difplaying himfelf as a*God of love, grace and mercy in Chrift, when he adds, I Jehovah am thy God, in the neareft, fweeteft and ftrongeft re- lations. And this comprehend ve promife, as it is fet in the front of the whole Law ; fo it is annexed to many of the precepts in par- ticular, as in Levit. chap, xix. Obedience to the Law is next en- forced* jicl concerning the Botlrine of Grace, 59 forced, by the glorious work of man's redemption through Jefus Chrift, typified by the redemption of Ifrael from their Egyptian bondage : And all this our LefTer Catechifm well exprefiech. in the following words, ' That becaufe God is the Lord, and our God, * and Redeemer; therefore we are bound to keep all his com- ' mandments.' So then, the Law of God, as it ftands in relation to a Covenant of Grace, being founded upon go/pel ground ' , it muft be of perpetual obligation. This will further appear, if we confider that, 3. The end of Chrift' s coming was not to deftroy the Law but to fulfil and eftablijh it, Matth. v. 17. He hath fulfilled it as a Cove- nant, by his own perfona! obedience as our Surety ; and having thus redeemed us from the hands -of our enemies, he gives forth the Law, as a perpetual rule of obedience to us ; that we, being deliver- ed by him out of the hands of our enemies, might ferve him with- out fear, in holine£s and righteouihefs before him, all the days of our life. To the fame purpofe is that -of the Apoftle, Rom. iii. 31. Do we make void the Laiv through faith P God forbid ; yea, ive ejla- hli/h the Law. It is true indeed, Chrift has for ever freed believers from the yoke of the Ceremonial Law ; and alfo, from the com- manding and condemning power of the Moral Law, as a Covenant, rigoroufly exacting obedience, as the condition of life, and forbidding fin under the pain of eternal death, without affording ftrength for o- bedience : Yea, through the grace of the gofpel, both our perfons and imperfect obedience are accepted in the Beloved. But yet, Chrift would not have it fo much as enter into the thoughts of any that profefs his name, that he came to dijfolve the obligation of the Law, as a Rule of Life ; which appears in the forecited Matth. v. 17. 'Think not that I am come to deftroy the Law or the Prophets ; I am not come to deftroy but to fulfil : On the contrary, he came to efa- hlifb the obligation of it to the end of the w^orld : For, (fays he, verfe 18.) Verily I fay unto you, till heaven a?id earth pafs, one jot vr one tittle Jhall in no wife pafs from the Law, till all be fulfilled. And thus he vindicates it from the corrupt glories of the Scribes and Pharifees, in his Sermon on the Mount, wherein he difcovers its ob- ligation, extent and fpirkuality. 4. Obedience and conformity to the holy Law, is one of the -great ends of our redemption by Jefus Chrift : For Tit. ii. 14. He gave himfelffor us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himfelf a peculiar people %ealous of good works. And the Apoftle Peter tells, that Chrift hath redeemed us from our vain converfation, not with filver or gold, or fuch corruptible things, but with his own precious blood. Wherefore, they dreadfully counter- act the very deiign of the death of Chrift, and of the reign of grace through his righteoufnefs, who imagine that the Doctrine of Grace patronizes a lawlefs liberty in the way of fin : For Chrift died not to procure a liberty tofn, but a libertyfromfn ; Accord- ing to Dan. ix. 24. He came tofinijh the tranfgrefjion, and to make &n end of fins, 1 John iii. 5. Te knew that he w$i manifefted to tale away 6o Act concerning the Doclrine of Grace. away our fins. Verfe 6. Whofoever abideth in him fmneth not : Whofoever ffineth, hath not feen him, neither known him. 5. All the followers of Jefus Chrift are exprefsly charged to re- member the Law of Mofes ; even after the a&ual rifing of the Sun of Righteoufnefs, in his incarnation, and after his faving manifeftation in their fouls : For it is promifed, Mai. iv. 2. But unto you that fear my name J> hall the Sun of Right eouf?icfs arife, with healing in his wings, andyejhall go forth and grow up as calves of the fall : And then it follows, verfe 4. Remember ye the Law of Moles my fervant, which I commanded unto him in Horeb, for all Ifrael. Where, by the Law of Mofes, we are not to underftand the Cerenionial Law, which being the fhadow of good things to come, did evanifh at the exhibition of the Son of God in the flefti : But it is that Law of Mofes, which was publiuied by God on mount Sinai ; that Law which was written by God's finger on Tables of Stone, and laid up in the Ark, to be preferved there, as a binding Rule of Obedience upon all, unto the end of the world. Such a regard had Chrift un- to this Law, and the honour of it, that he not only fulfilled the righteoufnefs thereof as a covenant, by his holy obedience ; but in his example, hath left us a pattern of all gofpel-holinefs : And he re- quires of all who are called by his name, that they depart from iniquity, that they mould follow hi?n, and be holy as he is holy ; and declares that, except their faith in him bring forth the fruits of obedience unto his Law, their faith is dead : Accordingly, at the laft day, their faith in him will be tried by the fruits thereof, Matth. xxv. 34,-45. Thus it appears, that the grace of the gofpel doth no way diffolve the obligation of the Royal Law, as a Rule of Obedience ; but that on the contrary, it doth efablifh and fweeten the fame. Now that which fweetefis it to believers is, that it is the Law of Chrijl ; it is his Commandments, and therefore not grievous ', his yoke, and therefore eafy ; his burden, and therefore light. The Law was given by him upon mount Sinai ; he was in the midft of that Ge- neral Afiembly of Angels, convened at the publication of the Law, even he who afcended up on high, and led captivity captive : Hence is that expreflion, Gal. iii. 19. It was ordained by Angels in the hand of a Mediator. It was ordained by Chrift authoritatively, and by Angels ininifterially. Chrift is the great Mediator, through whofe hand the Law is tranfmitted to us ; and this ferves wonderfully to fweeten it : For he not only flays the enmity between God and man ; but he alfo reconciles the Law to Jinners, and reconciles f?i- ?iers to the Law. There is mutual enmity between the Law and every finner, by nature : The Law accufes, curfes and condemns the linner ; and the finner is. not fubjecl: unto the Law, neither in- deed can be, becanfe it is oppofite unto his lulls. Now Chrift, as he reconciles God and man ; fo he reconciles the Law to the finner, and the finner to the Law. (1.) He reconciles the Law to the fnner, that believes in him ; for againjl fuch there is m Liw. Gal. v, 23. Rom. viii. 1. There is no condemning Law no Acl concerning the Dotlrine of Grace, 61 no purfuing Law, Rom. viii. 32, 33. Though the Law, as it is in the hand of an abfolute God, is an enemy unto the finner out of Chrift, condemning and purfuing him, Gal. iii. 10. Yet fo foon as he is in Chrift, it neither condemns nor purfues him, but it becomes a friendly counfellor, to direct him in the way of duty ; and as fuch, it fays, This is the way walk ye in it. (2.) As Chrift reconciles the law to the finner ? fo he reconciles the heart of the Jinner to the law, infomuch, that he delights in the law of the Lord, after the inward man ; he efteems all God's Commandments concerning all things, to be right ; and is ready to fay with David, how love I thy law ! Pfal. cxix. 97. Hold up my goings in thy paths, that my footjleps Jlip not, Pfal. xv ii. 5. And all this Chrift fweetly effectuates upon the finner in a day of power, by the execution of his feveral offices, as a Prophet, Prieft, and King. As a Prophet, he interprets and opens up the law in its purity and fpirituality ; he opens our eyes, to behold wondrous things out of his law. As a Prieft, he fatisfies juftice for our fins, covers our obedience, perfumes our fervices, and procures our ac- ceptance by the fweet incenfe of his interceflion. And as a King, he tranfmits the Law to his fubjects with the ftamp of his authority, as he is the great God our Saviour, and as God is in him a reconcil- ed God, proclaiming his name, The Lord, the Lord God, merciful and gracious, long-j uffering, and abundant i?i goodnefs and truth. Exod. xxxiv. 6. Article II. [Concerning the Evangelical grounds of obe- dience to the Law.] Thus the Law, in the hand of a Mediator, or as it ftands . in fubordination to the grace of the gofpel, is not to be considered as a rule of acceptance for juftification ; but as a rule of obedience and fanctification : By which obedience we teftify our gratitude, and glorify God. And here, 1. Our obedience to the Law is to proceed upon evangelical prin- ciples. Now, the leading principle of obedience to the Law, is faith in Jefus Chrift ; hence, all true obedience is called the obedience of Faith. The Spirit of life that is in Chrift Jefus, enters into the dead foul, and works faith in it, whereby it is united to Chrift as a Head of influence ; and then the life it lives is by the faith of the Son of God. I live, fays Paul, yet not L, but Chrijl liveth in me. All a&s of obedience in believers are acts of the life of Chrijl in them. All acts of obedience, performed by an unbelieving finner, are but dead tvorks : Whereas the believer, having the life and fpirit of Chrift in him, prefents himfelf a living facrifice to God, which is our reafonable fervice. 2. Gofpel-obedience to the holy Law, proceeds upon evangelical motives ; namely, the confideration of the matchlefs grace, love and mercy of God, manifefted in Chrift. Faith, viewing the excellency of God's loving-kindnefs. the height and depth, the breadth and length whereof pafleth all knowledge ; the foul thereupon cries out, Lord 62 Aft concerning the Doclrine of Grace. Lord, what wilt thou have me to do ? What Jhall I render unto the Lord for all his benefits toward me ? As God's lovfc to us moved him to do all that he hath done for us, in the work of redemption ; fo, that faith, which worketh by love, makes the foul a&ive to d® all for his glory and honour. 3. Gofpel-obedience is influenced by evangelical a ffetl ions, fuch as love, delight, zeal, filial fear, and the like \ according as the A- poftle fpeaks, Gal. v. 6. Faith worketh by love. Faith, as was faid, discovers the tranicendent love of God in Chrift : And, as one fire kindles another.; fo the love of God, apprehended by faith, both kills the enmity of the heart, and kindles a flame of love there to- ward God in Chrift, that many waters cannot quench, and all floods are not able to x drown ; and this love powerfully influences obedi- ence to the holy Law, If ye love me, fays Chrift, keep my com?na?id- vients. Who Jhall fe par ate us, fays the Apoftle, from the love of Chrift ? The love of felf influences the obedience of the legalift; but the love of Chrift conftrains the believer : And this love begets de- light, a ready mind, and fervency of fpirit in ferving the Lord, Pfal. cxix. 35. Rom. xii. 11. 4. Gofpel-obedience is performed to a Gofpcl-end ; which is the honour of Chrift, and the glory of God in him : For God will have all men to honour the Son, even as they honour the Father ; and thus it is that, as in Rom. xiv. 8. We live unto the Lord, doing all to the honour of Chrift, and the glory of God in him. Chrift is called the Alpha and Omega, the Firjl and the Lajl ; fo ought he to be unto us, in the whole of our obedience, the Beginning and the Ending of all we do. The unregenerate finner acts from himfelf and for himfelf, according to Hof. x. 1. Ifrael is an empty vine, he bringeth forth fruit to himfelf: Self is the fit ft principle and laft end of all that he doth •, and therefore, in all his doings, he is wholly re- jected of God. But, with the believer as fuch, Chrift is the firft principle of his life of holinefs, and his laft end therein : He only muft bear the glory of what he has wrought for us, and of what he works in us or by us, in a way of doing or fuifering, Rev. v. 12. To conclude, As obedience to the holy Law of God, was indif- penfibly required of innocent man -, by an obligation necefiarily a- rifing from the very nature of the Creator and creature, and theef- fential relation betwixt them : So, mankind having finned, and come fhort of the glory of God, the whole difpenfation of the free grace and love of God through Jefus Chrift, is juft calculate for re- storing fallen man unto a capacity of glorifying God, in time and eternity, by obedience unto the eternal and holy Law : " He hath " chofen us in him, before the foundation of the world, that we " fhould be holy, and without blame before him, in love," Eph. i. 4. " Jefus Chrift gave himfelf for us, that he might redeem us " from all iniquity, and purify unto himfelf a peculiar people, w zealous of good works,'' Tz>. ii. 13, 14. " Herein is my Father * l glorified (fays he, John xv. 8.) that ye bear much fruit :" And £q, he muft prefent the Church unto himfelf a " glorious church, " not Acl concerning the Doctrine of Grace. 63 ** not having fpot or wrinkle, or any fuch thing,'' Eph. v. 27* Thus, gofpel-obedience is of fuch importance unto the difpenfation of grace, that it is a principal end whereunto the fame is eflentially fubfervient, and whereunto it only is effectual: So that, according to the believer's experience and improvement of the free grace and love of God in the gofpel ; accordingly he will necefiarily, through the whole aim at, and prefs forward unto a glorifying of God, by perfect conformity unto his holy Law. But the peculiar encouragement and accefs we have unto holinefs, under the dif- penfation of grace, lies in this ; That gofpel-obedience mull be per- formed, not to juflify our per Jons, but to honour, glorify and declare our gratitude to him who jujlifes us freely by his grace, through the redemption that is in Chrift Jefus. Now, man being at firft married to the Law as a hufband, he hath a ftrong propenfity to cleave to this hufband, and to feek life and falvaticn by doing the works thereof : And it is only the power of efficacious grace, that can bring a iinner to renounce that firft hulband, and to take on with that new and better hufband, who is raifed from the dead. Yea, after the foul is actually married to Chrift, through the remaining legality of the heart, it is ready, at every turn, to call a fquint look back unto its old hufband, the Law of Works. Of this the Apoftle complains, Gal. iii. 3. — Having be- gun in the Spirit, are ye now made perfecl by the Flefh ? that is, do ye imagine to attain perfection in holinefs or fanctification, by returning back to the Law, and the Works thereof, for righteoufnefs and life ? There are therefore fundry legal ends, that mould be carefully a- voided, whether in our Covenanting, or in any other acts of obedi- ence : As, 1. W r e mufl not perform the duties of the Law for righteoujnejs end jujlification ; for this is to blot out that name of Chrift, Jer« xxiii. 6. The Lord our Righteousness : Nor, 2. To give unto God a recompence or requital for his mercies. It is indeed the higheft ingratitude, not to acknowledge him as our Benefactor, but we can never recompence him ; becaufe the creature, that hath its being and its all from him, can never give any thing to him but what is his own : If thou be righteous, what gavejl thou him, or what receiveth he of thine hand ? Job. xxxv. 7. And there- fore, it well becomes us to acknowledge, when we have done all, that we are unprofitable fervants, and that our goodnefe extendeth not unto him. 3. We muft not imagine that, by our acts of obedience, we make God amends for the difhonour done to him by our difobedience \ nor that thereby we make any atonement and propitiation for our fins : For this were to put our obedience in the room of Chrift our enly propitiation. 4. Neither muft we imagine that, by our obedience and duties, God is moved to befiow his mercies upon us : For, whatever God beftows upon a Iinner, is of mere grace and mercy, not for any works of righteoufnefs done by us. 5. We 64 Acl concerning the Doclrine of Grace. 5. We muft not imagine, that our obedience to the Law doth any wzyfx our title to eternal life ; or that it is any federal, condi- tional mean, in order to our pojfejfing eternal life. This indeed were to lay another foundation than that which God hath laid in Zion : For both f our title to eternal life, and our a&uai poffejfwn thereof at the end of the day, do lean wholly upon our union with Chrift by a faith of God's operation ; and another foundation can no man lay. All our hopes and expectations of life and falvation, muft be founded upon God's Covenant of grace and promife, efta- bliflied in the fecond Ada?n ; the condition of which was fullilled by him, the Covenant-head, in his obedience unto the death. Thus, David goes into eternity upon this blefled bottom, finging that fong, 1 Sam. xxiii. 5. Although my houfe he not Jo with God, yet he hath made with me (viz. in Chrift my new Covenant-head) an everlafiing Covenant, ordered in all things and fur e : For this is all my falvation, and all my defire. Now, Faith acting upon this Covenant of rich and free grace, has a manifold influence upon our obedience to the Law : Which may be cleared in confidering, Article III. The Connection betwixt God's Covenant of Grace and our Covenant of Duties, and the influence the one has upon the other. The Covenant of Grace which is made with, and ftands fall in Chrifl our glorious Head, lays us under much further obligation to duty and fervice, than the Covenant of Works, even while it flood in the firft Adam. We are more conftrained to obedience under the former, than ever Adam, in a ftate of innocency, was under the latter : And our obligation to vow and pay our vows, to covenant and perform, or keep our Covenants of duty and fervice to God in Chrift, is yet more ftrengthened and furthered ; by our being under a fuller and clearer difpenfation of the Covenant of Grace, than what thefe had who lived under the Old-Teftament, or the dark legal difpenfation of this Covenant of Grace. How the obligation is ftrengthened, and what influence the Covenant of Grace hath upon our Covenants of Duty, fervice and obedience, may appear in the following reffecls. Firfl, In refpecl of life ; which Chrift came to give, and to give more abundantly, John x. 10. Our life being in the fecond Adam, fecured or hid with Chrift in God; the more of this is communica- ted to us, the more are we in cafe for lively fervice, and bound to devote the life that comes to us by the death and life of Chrift, unto the obedience of him who died for us ; that we who live ihould not henceforth live unto ourfelves, but unto him who died for us, and rofe again, 2 Cor. v. 15. Secondly, In refpeft of light ; which fhines more brightly in the gofpel. The light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jefus Chrift, given there, to inform the mind, transform the heart, 4 Acl concerning the Do&rine of Grace, 65 heart, and reform the life, 2 Cor. iii. 18. obliges us to walk as chil- dren of light, Eph. v. 8. The more we fee in gofpel-light, how Chrift. hath faved us by fulfilling the Law perfectly for us as a Co- venant of Works, the more we are conftrained to glorify him by our conformity to the Law as a rule of duty and obedience, Gal. ii. 19. 2c. Rom. vii. 4. Thirdly, In refpecl: of liberty : Spiritual liberty, as well as fpiri- tual life and light, is greater and more glorious, by the more plen- tiful efFufion of the Spirit in the gofpel-difpenfation of the Covenant of Grace, than what we could have had either by the old Covenant of Works, or the old legal difpenfation of the new Covenant, 2 Cor. iii. 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 17. If the Son make us free, then are we free indeed, 'John viii. 36. This is a freedom that loofes us from fin, and binds us to duty, Rom. vi. 17, 18. Pfal. cxvi. 16. Fourthly, In reipecl of love and gratitude ; to which nothing leads us fo much, as the difplay of the grace and love of God to us in the new Covenant. This love kills our enmity and begets love, fo that the love of Chriit. conilrains us to his fervice, 2 Cor. v. 14. Being drawn powerfully with bands of love, we run cheerfully the way of his Commandments. Fifthly, In refpect of joy ; which the knowledge of the joyful found of the gofpel brings in more plentifully, even joy unfpeak- able and full of glory. This joy of the Lord is our ftrength, en- couraging us to walk in the light of his countenance, Pfal. lxxxix. 15, 16, 17. and joyfully to devote ourfelves and our fervice to him. Sixthly, In refpecl: of hope. For, as the gofpel opens the door of faith, that we may enter into Chrift, and clofe with him for fanc- tification as well as righteoumefs -, and fo be in cafe for the duties of holinefs outwardly, having the heart purified by faith to the ex- ercife of grace inwardly : So the gofpel opens the door of hope, even the hope of heaven and eternal life, at the end of our courfe of goi- pel-obedience. By the Gofpel of Chrift, of his death and refur- rection, we are begotten to a lively hope of being like him, by fee- ing him as he is ; and every man that hath this hope in him, purifieth him/elf, even as he is pure, 1 John iii. 2, 3. Seventhly, In refpecl; of power, or divine virtue and efficacy ; whereof efpecially the gofpel-difpenfation of the new Covenant is the channel. It is faid to be the power of God unto falvation, to every one that believeth ; — for therein is the right eon f fiefs of God re- vealed, from faith to faith, Rom. i. 16, 17. Thus, as it is the Reve- lation of Grace reigning through the righteoumefs of Chrift unto eternal life, it is the organ of the power of God unto our falvation ; and fo it has not only a moral argumentative influence upon holi- nefs, but alfo a phyfical and powerful operative influence, drawing us with bands of love unto his fervice, and pulling down the ftrong holds of fin which Hands in oppofition thereunto, 2 Cor. x. 4, 5. Eighthly, In refpecl of the promife of the Covenant of Grace ,• as it is a Covenant promifing all grace, both habitual and aclual, E%eh. iLixvi. 25, 26, 27. Grace for performing every duty required in I the 66 ASl concerning the Doftrine of Grace. the precept of the Law, is given forth to us in the promife of the. Gofpel : And, as we cannot fet about vowing or revolving to perform any duty commanded in the Law, without the grace promifed in the Golpel, fo the grace here promiied, is to be ap- prehended and depended upon by faith, as the great encourage- ment to vow and refolve upon obedience, faying with David, Pfal. cxix. 1 06. / have f worn, and I will perform it, that I will keep thy righteous judgments. As we have here the promife of the Spirit in the plentiful effuiion thereof, to make us fruitful in holinefs, I/a. xliv. 3, 5. the promife of irrength, to walk and run in the way of the Lord, Ifa. xl. 29, 31. the promife of recovery, in cafe of fai- lures and decays, Hof. xiv. 7. the promife of perfeverance to the end, in a courfe of gofpel -obedience, jfer. xxxii. 40. 1 Pet. 1. 5. 80, having thefe and the like promifes, that by thefe we may be par- takers of the divine nature, we are encouraged to clean fe our [elves from allflihinefs of the fief j and fpir it, per feeling holinefs in the fear of God, 2 Cor. vii. 1. Ninthly, In refpecl of the authority enjoining obedience upon us, and calling us to devote ourfelves and ourfervice to him. Though this authority is originally the fame that enjoined obedience upon man in the firft Covenant \ yet it appears to us, in the gofpel glafs, more amiable and lovely, by its being not the authority of an ab- folute God, but of God in Chrifl x reconciling the world to himfelf. While God is related unto us, as our God and Redeemer, we are } aid under the ftrongeft obligations to duty and obedience-, accor- ding to the import of the preface to the Ten Commandments, " That, becaufe God is the Lord, and our God, and Redeemer ; " therefore we are bound to keep all his Commandments." 'Tenthly, In refpecl of the furniture we have in our new Cove- nant-head, the Lord Jefus Chrifl. Having in him righteoufnefs for acceptance, and frrength for amftance, in every duty, and par- ticularly in folemn vowing of obedience to him, Ifa. xliv. 3, 4, 5. the Spirit of all grace being above mcafure in our glorious Head, for our ufe and behoof : We are called to be frGng in the grace that is in Qhrifi 'Jcfus, 1 Tim. ii. 1. to be jlrojig in the Lord, and in the power of his might, Eph. vi. 10. by whom flrengthening we can do all things, Phil. iv. 13. This furniture we have always in him, as our new Covenant-head, and always accefs to the benefit of it by faith, the proper language whereof is, Surely in the Lord have I righteoufnefs and frength, Ifa. xlv. 24. And as without this faith, it is impofliblc to pleafe God by any duty or fervice \_ fo by this faith, we are in cafe to pleafe God, and ferve him fpi- ritually and acceptably. There is no comparifon between the fur- niture we once had in the firft Adam, and this furniture we have- in Chrifi ; which is no lefs than all the fulnefs of the Godhead dwelling in him, fo as we alfo are complete in him, Col. ii. 9, 10. A?id of his fulnefs have all we received, and grace for grace, John i. 1 6. according to his promife, My grace is fufficient for thee ; for my frength is made perfeEt in. weaknefs, 2 Cor. xii. 9. As therefore we Acl concerning the Doflrine of Grace. 6y we are called to work out our own falvation with fear and trembling ; for it is God which worketh in us both to will and to do, of his good pleafure, Phil. ii. 12, 13. and tofanftify our/elves, becaufe he is the Lord that fanclifes us, Lev. xx. 7, 8. So, as for the great work of covenanting to ferve and obey him, we may with humble confi- dence fet about it, in the faith of this new Covenant furniture we have in Jefus Chrift-, faying, as it is in Pfal. lxxi. 16. / will go in the Jlrength of the Lord God ; / will make mention of thy righte- onfnefs, even of thine only. Extracted— JOHN POTTS, Pr.Cls. The following extract from the Difplay of the Seceffon Teftimony, Vol. I. page 187. may be added here, to illuftrate what is taught concerning the Appropriation of Faith, in the preceeding Act, Seel:. 2. Art. 2. The Afibciate Prefbytery do teach, in their Act concerning the Doclrine of Grace, — that this perfualion is competent to a perfon, in the language of juftifying faith, vi%. " Jefus Chrift is mine, I " mail have life and falvation by him ; and whatsoever Chrift did " for the redemption of mankind, he did it for me" Thus, faith immediately terminates upon a prefent fpecial intereft in Chrift, "Jefus Chrijl is mine ; as to which, it proceeds upon the prefent re- velation and offer of him in the gofpel, looking out to that, — with- out looking back to any divine purpofes or .intentions : And accord- ing to the myftericus order of grace, the Lord gives truth to this fpecial intereft, at the time of faith's applying Chrift to the foul; the perfon being actually inverted with his juftifying righteoufnefs, and accepted in the fight of God on that account, — which never be- comes true in the cafe of any, till the moment of believing. In the next place, it is quite infeparable from the faith of this fpecial in- tereft in Chrift, and muft lie in the fame act of faith,— to believe eternal falvation by Chrift ; If jail have life and falvation by him. Now this faith of a fpecial faving intereft in Chrift — muft likewife by the fame acl, in this due order, terminate upon a fpecial intereft in all his redeeming work ; whatfocver Chrijl did for the redemption «f mankind he did it for me. As to which laft article, we may obferve, — that it is entirely different from a believing, that Chrijl intentionally died for the per- [on in particular : As this faith is the fame, upon the matter, with the faith of eleclion ; which, however attainable it be, can noway belong to faith asjujlifying. But when Chrift with his whole fal- vation is applied by faith, upon the ground of the gofpel-cffer and call •, then whatfoever he did for the redemption of mankind, doth therein actually terminate upon the perfon,— and is believed fo to do* 68 Act concerning the Do6lri?ie of Grace. do. Wherefore as to the plea of juftifying faith, [whatfoevef Chrift did for the redemption of mankind, he did it for me~\ ; the meaning is not, for me, by a foregoing purpofe and intention: But the meaning is, for me by a following iffue and termination thereof upon me ; through the gofpel-offer and call, embraced by faith. As when a traveller is entertained in a houfe upon his way, — he eats what is fet before him, without any queftion ; juft upon feeing that, in its nature, it is every way fuitable and fufficie?it for his need, — and that he is freely invited to the ufe thereof. And his very eating of the food implies a concluding that all the prepara- tion of it was for him ; becaufe the preparation of it terminates in him, by the food itfelf doing fo : Which yet is entirely different from his being otherwife informed and believing, — that the food was intentionally provided and made ready for him, before he faw it. ACT ■ Hi 1 1 H H9HHI P *% ^t* V<&*^Jt k^>^M^?^vM^i