WV10 P979h ^^\ sec #11,228 Pusey, E. B. The holy Eucharist, a comfor o the penitent p'fJt '\\\\\ \\K)\,\ J'lUClIAKIS'l' A C'OMrolM lO J'lIK PKNITKNT. A SK KM ON PKK ACHED BEFORE THE UNIVERSITY, IX TiiKrATnp:i.)HALrnrHrii oj^-cniusr, in omohd, ON THE FOURTH SUNDAY AFTER EASTER. HV THK REV. E. H. PUSEY, D.I). lirOIUS PItdFF.SSOU OK HI.HRKW, CANON OK i:.iIUIST C HUHCM, ANT/ l.ATK KKM.OW OF OHIKI, Cr)I,I,F.OK. OXFORD. JOHN HF.NRY TARKEK ; rs>t^ .1. (J. F. AND J. RFVINGTON, LONDON. ^^ 1843. ;^^ " The true imdeistanding of this fruition and union, which is betwixt the body and the head, betwixt the true believers and Christ, the ancient Catholic Fathers both perceiving themselves, and commending to their people, were not afraid to call this Supper, some of them, the salve of immortality and sovereign pre- servative against death ; other, a deifical communion ; other, the sweet dainties of our Saviour, the pledge of eternal health, the defence of faith, the hope of the resurrection ; other, the food of immortality, the healthful gTace, and the conservatory to everlasting life. All which sayings bolh of the holy Scripture and godly men, truly attributed to this celestial banquet and feast, if we would often call to mind, O how would they inflame our hearts to desire the participation of these mysteries, and oftentimes to covet after this bread, continually to thirst for this food !" Homilies, Ix/ Pari of {he Sermon on the Sacrament. BAXTER, PRINTER, OXFORD. pREi \cp:. It is with j)ain that the following Sermon is ]Hihlishecl. For it is impossible for any one not to foresee one portion of its effecls ; what floods, namely, of blasphemy against holy ti iitli will be poured forth by the infidel or heretical or secular and anti-religious papers with which our Church and country is at this time afllicted. It is like casting with one's own hands, that which is most sacred to be outraged and profaned. Still there seem to be higher duties, which require even this. The Gospel must be a savour unto life or a savour unto death ; from the first, it has been blas- phemed, wherever it has been preached. It has been blasphemed by Jews, Pagans, and each class of heretics as they arose ; the Arians used blasphemous jests, taught the people blasphemous ballads, and profaned the Holy Eucharist; increase of scoffers and blasphemers are among the tokens of the last days; and yet the two witnesses are to bear testimony, though in sackclolh. The more the truth prevails, the madder must ilic world become ; (he blasphemies with which holy truth is now assailed, arc but a token of its victories. The first duty of a Minister of Christ is to His little ones; for tin ir sakes, lest any be per])lex('d in consecjuencc of all which has been lately said, this Sermon is published; and for them the following exj)lanation is intended. Nothing, throughout the whole Sermon, was further from my thoughts tiian cniitrovirsy. I had, on such occasions as niv ofiico afforded, coinmeiued a course of Sermons on tlic IV comforts provided by the Gospel for the penitent amid the consciousness of sin, with the view to meet the charge of sternness, involved by the exhibition of one side of Cathohc truth ; in this course, the sacred subject of the Holy Eucharist, of necessity, came in its order ; and it was my wish (however I may have been hindered by sudden indisposition from developing my meaning as I wished) to point out its comforting character to the penitent in two ways ; 1st) indirectly, because it is the Body and Blood of his Lord, and is the channel of His Blessed Presence to the soul, 2ndly) because in Holy Scripture the mention of remission of sins is connected with it. In essaying to teach this, I could not but forget contro- versy; having, in the commencement, warned against ir- reverent disputings, I lived for the time in holy Scripture and its deepest expositors, the Fathers, and was careful to use rather their language than my own, lest, on so high a subject, I should seem to speak over-boldly. Conscious of my own entire adherence to the formularies of my Church, and having already repeatedly expressed myself on this subject, and in the very outset of this Sermon conveyed at once, that I believed the elements to " remain in their natural substances," and that I did not attempt to define the 7?iode of the Mystery that they were also the Body and Blood of Christ'', I had no fear of being misunder- stood. Once more to repeat my meaning, in order to relieve any difficulties which might (if so be) be entertained by pious minds, trained in an opposed and defective system of teaching, before whom the Sermon may now be brought. My own views were cast, (so to speak) in the mould of the minds of B]). Andrews'' and Abp. Bramhall'', which I re- garded as the type of the teaching of our Church. From them originally, and with them, I learnt to receive in their literal sense, our Hlessed liord's soleinii words, " Tliis is My Body," and Ironi llieni, wliile 1 believe the consecrated elements to become, by virtne of His consecrating Words, truly and really, yet spiritually and in an ineflable way. His Body and Blood, 1 learnt also to withhold my thoughts as to the mode of this great Mystery, but " as a Mystery" to " adore it''." With the Fathers then, and our own great Divines, (explaining, as 1 believe, the tnie meaning of our Church',) I could not but speak of the consecrated elements, as being, what, since He has so called them, I believe them to become. His Body and Blood; and I feared not, that, using their language, I should, when speaking of Divine and " spiritual" things, be thought to mean other- wise than " spiritually," or having discJaimed all thoughts as to the mode of their being, that any should suppose I meant a mode which our Church disallows. It remains only to say, that the notes (with a few ex- ceptions) are such as, amid hurry and severe indisposition, I could, when my Sermon was demanded, put together, with the view at once of shewing those who were to })ronounce upon it, that I had not used high language, of my own mind, and that they might not unconscionsly blame the Fathers, while they thought they were blaming myself only They spread over the wider space, because, b Bp. Andrews, ib. ^ As shewn by the use of the Ancient words, " The Body of our Lord Jesus Christ," (rejected in Edw. VI. 2d Book.) the Eubric for " the reverent eating and drinking" of the consecrated elements which remain, and the Arti- cle, which, while declaring that " the Body of Christ is given, taken, and eaten in the Supper, only after a spiritual and heavenly manner," by the use of the words " given" and " taken," shews that it calls That " the Body of Christ" which is " given" by the minister, " taken" by the people. (See Knox's Remains, ii. p. 170.) In like way, the Catechism teaches that " The Body and Blood of Christ are verily and indeed taken and received of the faithful, in the Lord's Supper." The very strength of the words of the Rubric denying " the CorjHtral Presence of Christ'.s natural Flesh and Blootl" in itself implies (as we know of those who inserted that Rubric) that they believed every thing short nf this. wholly unconscious what could be objected to, I was reduced to conjecture what it might be. The Appendix is now drawn up by a friend, (the writer being disabled) with the same view, that some might be saved from objecting to what, though often taught, may be new to them, when they see that the same, or things nmch stronger, have been taught by a series of Divines in our Church. It is not meant that some of these writers (e. g. Mede) are always consistent with themselves ; it is meant only to shew what has been taught, partly without rebuke, partly with authority, in our later English Church. Nor has it been the object to select the strongest passages of our writers; on the contrary, some stronger than any here quoted have been purposely passed by, out of arnvriter so universally received as G. Herbert*^. The general tone of doctrine has been the object chiefly had in view^ in the selection. Some of the materials of the Catena have been already used in previous explanations on the doctrine ^ Passages or phrases, here and there, in the Sermon, were, on account of the length of the whole, omitted in the delivery; they were inserted in the copy called for, in brackets, as making the whole more authentic ; these distinctions are now omitted, as needlessly distracting such as may read for edification, since in one instance only did the passages so omitted contain doctrine, viz. the words from the fathers from " and by commingling" to " Divine Nature," p. 17, 18. And now, may God have mercy on this His Church ! It is impossible not to see, that a controversy has been awakened, which, from the very saciedness of the subject, d Both in his Poems and his Country Parson, which forms part of the Clergyman's Instructor, a work printed by the University, and recommended by Bishops to Candidates for Ordination. « Tracts, No. 81 ; Mr. Newman's " Letter to Dr. Faussett ;" Bishop of Exeter's Charge ; my " Letter to Dr. Jelf ;" " the doctrine of the Catholic Church in England on the Holy Eucharist." VI 1 ainl \hv va{;iuMU'ss of the views ol" mnnv. an«. Thifi is My Blood of the New Testament, iilticJi is alud for maun for the remission of sins. It is part of the manifold wisdom of God, that His gifts, in nature and in grace, minister to distinct, and, as it often seems, unconnected ends; manifesting thereby the more His own Unity, as the secret cause and power of all things, putting Itself forward in varied forms and divers manners, yet Itself the one Cause of all that is. The element which is the image of our Baptism, cleanses alike and refreshes, cnlighteneth the fainting eye, wakens to life, as it falls, a world in seeming exhaustion and death, changes the barren land into a garden of the Lord, gives health and nourish- ment and growth. And if in nature, much more in the (Jifts of Grace. For therein God, not by Will or by Power only, but by Himself and the Effluence of His Spirit, is the Life of all which lives through Him. Our One Lord is to us, in varied forms, all, yea more than all, His disciples dare ask or think. All are His i.ife, Howing through all His members, and in all, as it is admitted, effacing death, enlarging life. As blind, He is our Wisdom; as sinful, our Righteousness; as hallowed, our Sanctification; as re- covered from Satan, our lU'demption; as sick, our Physician; aswi'ak, our Strength; as unclean, our l-'oiiiitain ; as dark- ness, our Light; as daily fainting, our daily Hrcad; as dying, Life Lternal; as asleep in Him, our Resurrection. It is, then, according to the analogy of His other gifts, that His two great Sacraments have in themselves manifold B gifts. Baptism containeth not only remission of sin, actual or original, but maketh members of Christ, children of God, heirs of Heaven, hath the seal and earnest of the Spirit, the germ of spiritual life; the Holy Eucharist im- parteth not life only, spiritual strength, and oneness with Christ, and His Indwelling, and participation of Him, but, in its degree, remission of sins also. As the manna is said to have '' contented every man's delight and agreed to every taste %" so He, the Heavenly Manna, becometh to every man what he needeth, and what he can receive; to the penitent perhaps chiefly remission of sins and continued life, to those who have " loved Him and kept His word," His own transporting, irradiating Presence, full of His own grace and life and love; yet to each full contentment, because to each His own overflowing, undeserved, good- ness. Having then, on former occasions, spoken of the Fountain of all comfort, our Redeeming Lord, His Life for us and Intercession with the Father, as the penitent's stay amid the overwhelming consciousness of his sins, it may well suit, in this our season of deepest joy, to speak of that, which, flowing from the throne of the Lamb which was slain, is to the penitent, the deepest river of his joy, the Holy Mysteries ; from which, as from Paradise, he feels that he deserves to be shut out, from which perhaps, in the holier discipline of the Ancient Church, he would have been for a time removed, but which to his soul must be the more exceeding precious, because they are the Body and Blood of His Redeemer. While others joy with a more Angelic joy, as feeding on Him, Who is the Angels' food, and " sit," as St. Chrysostom'' says, " with Angels and Archangels and heavenly powers, clad with the kingly robe of Christ itself, yea clad with the King Himself, and having spiritual armoury,'' he may be the object of the joy of => Wisd. xvi. 20. •> Horn. 46. in S. Joh. fin. d Anh life in Him is the substance of His whole teaching, the teaching itself is manifold. Our Lord incul- cates not one truth only in varied forms, but in its different bearings. He answers not the strivings of the Jews, '' how can this man give us His Flesh to eat ^ Such an '' how can these things be ?'' He never answereth ; and we, if we are wise, shall never ask how" they can be elements of this world and yet His very Body and Blood. But how they give life to us, He does answer; and amid this apparent uniformity of His teaching, each separate sentence gives us a portion of that answer. And the teaching of the whole, as far as such as we may gra>p it, is this. That He' is fc " Marvel not hereat, nor inquire in Jewish mnnner <■ how,' " &c. S. Cyr. in S. Joh. 1. iv. p. .SG2. Add. p. 368, 6. 1 '* When the Son naith that He was sent, He signifieth His Incarnation and nothing else ; hut by Incarnation we mean that He became wholly man. As then the Father, He Haith, made Me man, and Hince I was begotten of That Which i8, by nature. Life, I, i)eing God the Word, ' live,' and, having become man, filled My Temple, that is. My Body, with Mine own nature, so then, in like manner, shall he also who eateth My Flesh, live by Me. For I took mortal llesh ; but, having dwelt in it, being by nature Life because I am of The living Father, I have transmuted it wholly into My own life. The corruption of the flesh conquered not Me, but I con.juered it, as God. As then (for I again say it, unwearied, since it is to profit) although I was made flesh, (for the ' being sent' meaneth this,) again 1 live through the living Father, that Ih, retaining in Myself the natural excellence (t!,fvt„) of Him Who begat Me, so also he, who, by the participation of My Flesh, receiveth Me, shall have life in himself, being wholly and altogether transferred the Living Bread, because He came down from Heaven, and as being One God with the Father, hath life in Him- self, even as the Father hath life in Himself; the life then which He is, He imparted to that Flesh which He took into Himself, yea, which He took so wholly, that Holy Scripture says, He became it, " the Word became flesh," and since it is thus a part of Himself, " Whoso eateth My Flesh, and drinketh My Blood," (He Himself says the amazing words,) "eateth Me," and so receiveth into Him- self, in an ineffable manner, his Lord Himself, "dwelleth" (our Lord says) " in Me and I in Him," and having Christ within him^ not only shall he have.hui he ''hatlt' already " eternal Life," because he hath Him Who is " the Only True God and Eternal Life ' ;" and so Christ " will raise him up at the last Day," because he hath His hfe in him. Receiving Him into this very body"", they who are His, into Me, Who am able to give life, because I am, as it were, of the life- giving Root, that is, God the Father." S. Cyril in S. Joh. 1. iv. c. 3 init. p. 366. ed. Aub. ^ " So receive the Holy Communion, believing that it hath power of expelling not death only, but the diseases in us, [i. e. in the soul.] For Christ thus coming to he in us^ (»> hfMv yiyovus,) lulleth in us the law which rageth in the members of the fiesh, and kindleth carefulness to Godward, and deadeneth passions, &c. S. Cyr. in S. Joh. 6, 56. p. 365. " He saith, he that eateth My Flesh dwelleth in Me, shewing that He is mingled in him (l» uuru amxi^- »Sr«<)." S. Chrys. Hom. 47 in S. Joh. §. 1. " Thou hast, not the Cherubim, but the Lord Himself of the Cherubim indwelling, not the pot, nor the manna, the tables of stone and Aaron's rod, but the Body and Blood of the Lord." S. Chrys. in Ps. 133. " Thou art about to receive the King within thee {vorohixf-tr^eci) by communion. When the King entereth the soul, there ought to be a great calm." S. Chrys. de B. Philog. fin. ' See S. Cyr. ib. p. 363. «» " Why do we receive it [the Holy Eucharist] within us? Ls it not that it may make Christ to dwell in us corporeally also («^' elxi ««' aafiOLTtKus i>fi7v lyoixt^oufd rav X^tffTov), by participation and communion of His Holy Flesh ? For S. Paul says that the Gentiles are embodied (trvffffufix) with, and coheirs, and copartakers of Christ? How are they shewn to be' embodied?' Because being admitted to share the Holy Eucharist, they become one body with Hiin, just as each one of the holy Apostles. For why did He [S. Paul] call his own, yea, the members of all, as well as his own, the members of Christ? (1 Cor. vi. 15.) And the Saviour Himself saith, ' Whoso eateth My 9 receive litV, which shall })ass over to our very tlecayiiij^ flesh; they have within them lliin Who is Life and Immortality and Incorruption, to cast out or absorb into itself our natural mortaUty and death and corru])tion, and '* shall live for ever/' because made one with Him Who Alone " liveth for evermore." It is not then life only as an outward <^ift, to be possessed by us, as His gift ; it is no mere strengtheninLC and refreshing of our souls, by the renewal" and confirming our wills, and invigorating of our moral nature, giving us more fixedness of purpose, or imj)lanting in us Christian graces; it is no gift, such as we mii^ht imagine given to the most perfect of God's created beings in himself. Picture we the most perfect wisdom, knowledge, strength, harmony, proportion, brightness, beauty, fitness, completeness of created being; fair as was Flesh, and drinlceth My Blood, dwelleth in Me and I in Him.* For here it is especially to be observed, that Christ saith that He shall be in us, not by a certain relation only as entertained through the aflfections, but also by a natural participation. For as, if one entwineth wax with other wax, and melteth them by the fire, there resulteth of both one, (i» n) so through the participation of the Body of Christ and of His precious Blood, He in us, and we again in Him, are co-united. For in no other way could that which is by nature corruptible be made alive, unless it were bodily entwined with the Body of That Which is by nature Life, the Only-Begotten, (i«V»i rvurXAxn ffufJLUTiKUf Teji etufiXTi rJJf Kcira. (fuffit ^*»»jf , tout iVt/, reu Mti>eyii>»vs.\ And if any be not persuaded by my words, give credence t<» Christ Himself, crying aloud, ' Verily, verily, I say unto you. Except ye eat, &c.' (S. Job. vi.53, 54.) Thou hearest now Himself plainly declaring, that, unless we ' eat His Flesh and drink His Blood,' we ' have not in ourselves,' that is, in our llesh, * Kternal Life ;' but Eternal Life may be conceived to be, and most justly, the Flesh of That Which is Life, that is, the Only-Begotten." S. Cyr. in S. Job. 16, L 1. X. c. 2. p. HG2, 3. " How say they that the flesh goeth to corruption, and partaketh not of life, which is nourished by the Body of the Lord and by His Blood. Our doctrine agrecth with the Eucharist, and the Eucharist con- tirnieth our doctrine. For as bread out of the earth, receiving the invocation of G(k1, is no longer comnion bread but Eucharist, consisting of two things, an earthly and a heavenly, so also our bodies, receiving the Eucharist, are no longer corruptible, having the hope of the Resurrection for ever." S. Iren. 4. 18. 6. comp. S. Greg. Nyss. (very fully) C atcch. Orat. c. 37- t. iii. p. 102. n But, in the words of our Catechism, " by the n<.dy and Blood of Christ," i. c. by receiving them. 10 that angel "in the garden of God'' before he fell, *Hhe seal of comeliness, full of wisdom, and complete in beauty — perfect in his ways from the day he was created"." Yet let this be a perfection, upheld indeed of God, yet external to Him, as a mere creation, and it would fall unutterably short of the depth of the mystery of the Sacraments of Christ, and the gift, the germ whereof is therein contained for us ; although such as we actually are, we know that, for strength we have weakness, for knowledge ignorance, our nature jarring still, dishar- monized, obscured, deformed, both by the remains of original corruption and our own superadded sins. For the life therein bestowed is greater than any gift, since it is life in Christ, life through His indwelling, Himself Who is Life. And Holy Scripture hints, that the blessed Angels, who never fell, shall in some way to us unknown, gain by the mystery of the Incarnation, being with us gathered together under One Head, our Incarnate Lord, into His One Body% the fulness of Him Who filleth all in all. Certainly, Scripture seems to imply, that, although He " took not the nature of angels" but " of man,""* yet all created beings, " thrones and dominions and principalities and powers," shall, if one may reverently say it, be more filled with God, when, this His body being perfected, there shall be no check or hindrance to the full effluence of His Divine Nature, circulating through the whole Body, into which He shall have " knit things in heaven and things in earth," " the innumerable company of the Angels," and "the just made perfect;" and the whole glorified Church shall be clothed and radiant with Him, the Sun of Righteousness. ° Ezek. xxviii. 12, 15. P " I say more, even angels and virtues and the higher powers are con- federated in this one Church, as the Apostle teaches that in Christ all things are reconciled, not only things in earth, but things in heaven." S. Nicet£e Expl. Symb. p, 44. (quoted Manning, Unity of the Church, p. 37.) 11 Ami of this wc have the therms and first beginnings now. This is (if we may rovercntly so speak) the order of tlie mystery of tiie Incarnation'', that the Eternal Word so took our Hush into Himself, as to impart to it His own inherent life ; so then we, partaking of It, that life is transmitted on to us also, and not to our souls only, l^ut our bodies i also, since we become flesh of His flesh, and bone of His bone', and He Who is wholly life is imparted to us wholly'. The Life which He is, spreads around, first giving Its own vitality to that sinless Flesh which He united indissolubly with P " Doth any man doubt but that even from the flesh of Christ our very bodies do receive that life which shall make them glorious at the latter clay, and for which they are already accounted parts of His blessed Body ? Our corruptible bodies could never live the life they shall live, were it not that here they are joined with His Body which is incorruptible, and that His is in ours as a cause of immortality, a cause by removing through the death and merit of His own flesh that which hindered the life of ours. Christ is thrre- fore both as God and as man that true vine whereof we both spiritually and corj)orally are branches. The mixture of His bodily substance with ours is a thing which the ancient fathers disclaim. Yet the mixture of His flesh with ours they speak of, to signify what our very bodies through mystical conjunction receive from that vital efficacy which we kn«iw to be in His ; and from bodily mixtures they borrow diverse similitudes rather to declare the truth, than the manner of coherence between His sacred and the sanctified bodies of saints." Hooker, H. E. v. 56. 9. The thoughtful study of these chapters of Hooker on the connection of the Sacraments with the Incarnation of our Blessed Lord would do much, in pious minds, to remove existing dif- ficulties in the reception of the truth. 1 '* The Holy Body then of Christ giveth life to those in whom It is and keepeth them from incorruption, mingled (itaxi^feifittat) with our bodies. For vre know it to be the Hody of no other than of Him Who is, by Nature, Life, having in Itself the whole Virtue of the united Word, and in-qualitiid as it were, ((rnr#, alle-^ing our Blessed Lord's words, " My Flesh is truly meat, My Blood is truly drink." " Of the truth of the Flesh and Blood, there is no room left for doubt. For now, according both to the declaration of the Lord and our faith. It is truly Flesh and truly Blood. And these, received into us, cau>e, that wc are in Christ and Christ in us. is not this truth .^ Be it not truth to those who deny that Christ Jesus is true (iod. He then is in us through the flesh, and we are in Him, since this, which we are, is with Him in (jod." y lb. §. 14. 14 Would that, instead of vain and profane disputings, we could but catch the echoes of these hallowed sounds, and forgetting the jarrings of our earthly discords, live in this harmony and unity of Heaven, where, through and in our Lord, we are all one in God. Would that, borne above ourselves, we could be caught up within the influence of the mystery of that ineffable love whereby the Father would draw us to that oneness with Him in His Son, which is the perfection of eternal bliss, where will, thought, affec- tions shall be one, because we shall be, by communica- tion of His Divine Nature, one. Yet such is undoubted Catholic teaching, and the most literal import of Holy Scripture, and the mystery of the Sacrament, that the Eternal Word, Who is God, having taken to Him our flesh and joined it indissolubly with Himself, and so, where His Flesh is, there He is', and we receiving it, receive Him, and receiving Him are joined on to Him through His flesh to the Father, and He dwelHng in us, dwell in Him, and with Him in God. '' I," He saith, " in the Father, and ye in Me, and I in you." This is the per- fection after which all the rational creation groans, this for which the Church, which hath the first fruits of the Spirit, groaneth within herself, yea this for which our Lord Himself tarrieth, that His yet imperfect members ad- vancing onwards in Him% and the whole multitude of the Redeemed being gathered into the One Body, His whole Body should, in Him, be perfected in the Unity of the Father. And so is He also, as Man, truly the Mediator between God and Man, in that being as God, One with the Father, as man, one with us, we truly are in Him who is truly in the Father. He, by the truth of the Sacrament, * '^ Where His Body is, there Christ is. When the adversary shall see thy dwelling-place (hospitium) filled with the brightness of the heavenly Pre- sence," &c. S. Ambr. in Ps. 118. §. 8. 48. " S. Aug. in Ps. 138. §.21. Serm. 136. de verb. Ev. Joh. 9. c. 5. coinp. S. Ilil. de Trin. xi. 49, (quoted Tract on Holy Baptism, p. 180. ed. 3.) 15 (Iwcllt'th in us, in AVlumi, hy Nature, all the fulness of tiie Godhead dwclleth; and lowest is joined on with liighcst, earth with heaven, corruption with incorruption, man with God. But where, one may feel, is there here any place for the sinner? Here all breathes of holy life, life in (iod, the life of (iod imparted to man, the indwelling of the All Holy and Incarnate Word, the Presence of God in the soul and body, incorruption and eternal life, through His Holy Pre- sence and union with Him, ^Vho, being God, is Life. Where seems there room for one, the mansion of whose soul has been broken down, and he to have no place where Christ may lay His head''; the vessel has been broken, if not defiled, and now seems unfit to contain God's Holy Presence; the tenement has been narrowed by self-love, and seems incapable of expanding to receive the love of God, or God Who is love; or choked and thronged with evil or foul imaginations ; or luxury and self indulgence have dissolved it, or evil thoughts and desires have made room for evil spirits in that which was the dwelling-place of the Trinity ? Doubtless, God's highest and " holy" gift, is as the Ancient Church proclaimed, chiefly " for the holy." '* Ye cannot be partakers of the Table of the Lord, and the table of devils." And as Holy Scripture, soalso the Ancient Church, when alluding to the fruits of this inefJable gift, speak of them mostly as they would be to those, who, on earth, already live in Heaven, and on Him Who is its life and bliss. They speak of those ** clothed in flesh and blood, drawing nigh to the blessed and inunortal nature';" b lip. Andrewes' Devotions for Holy CommunioD, (from ancient Liturpie«,) " C) Lord, I am not worthy, I am not fit, that Thou shouldest come under the roof of my soul ; for it in all desolate and ruined ; nor hast Thou in me fitting place to lay Thy head." «: S. Chrys. de Sacerdot. iii. 6. add. in die Nat. J. C. t. 2.'p. .306. " consider that, bcinn earth and anhes, thou receivest the IJody and IJlood of Christ 16 of "spiritual firc^;" ''grace*^ exceeding human thought and a gift unutterable;"' " spiritual food^, surpassing all creation visible and invisible," " kindling ^^ the souls of all and making them brighter than silver purified by the fire;" " removing '^ us from earth, transferring us to hea- ven," " making angels for men, so that it were a wonder that man should think he v/ere yet on earth '," yea, more than angels, " becoming that which we receive '^j the Body of Christ." For that so we are " members^ of Him, not by love only, but in very deed, mingled with that Flesh, mingled with Him, that we might become in a manner one — now when God inviteth thee to His own Table, and setteth before thee His own Son, — let us draw near as approaching to the King of Heaven." d De Beat. Philog. Horn. \i. t. i. p. 500. ed. Ben. de Poenit. Horn. 9. init. S. Ephr. 0pp. Syr. t. iii. p. 23. e S. Chrys. in Ps. 133. ^ S, Chrys. de Bapt. Christi fin. e " This Blood is the salvation of our souls ; by this the soul is washed ; by this beautified ; by this kindled ; this maketh our mind gleam more than fiire ; this maketh the soul brighter than gold." S. Chrys. in S. Joh. Horn. 46. §, 3, add de Sac. iii. 4. h S. Chrys. in S. Matt. Horn. 25. §. 3. * S. Chrys. de Bapt. Christi fin. t. ii. p. 374. k S. Aug. Serm. 227. ad Inf. de Sacr. 1 S. Chrys. Horn. 46. in S. Joh. §. 3. " But, that we may be thus [one body, members of His Flesh and of His Bones,] not through love only, but in very truth, be we mingled with that Flesh. For this taketh place through the Food He gave us, wishing to shew the longing He hath towards us, where- fore He hath mingled Himself with us, and blended (avs^y^s) His Body with us, that we might be in a manner one substance (?» n) as the body joined to the head ;" and in S. Matt. Hom. 82. ^. 5. " It sufficed not to Him to become man, nor to be buflFetted and slain, but He mingleth Himself also with us, and not by faith only, but in very deed maketh us His Body." '' For as if one joineth wax with wax, he will see the one in the other, in like manner, I deem, he who receiveth the Flesh of our Saviour Christ, and drinketh His precious Blood, as He saith, is found as one substance with Him, (fv dig ^^os avrov) commingled as it were and immingled with Him (^irvvavxKi^9a/u,tvos uff-rtp xu) a.ta.uiytvfji.ivos kvtZ,) through the participation, so that he is found in Christ, and Christ again in him. — As then Paul saith that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump, so the least portion of the consecrated elements blendeth (avuipv^u) our whole body with itself, and filleth it with its own mighty working, and thus Christ cometh to be in us and we in Him." S. Cyr. in S. Joh. 6, 57. p. 364, 5. S. Cyril again uses the word «v«xix^a/^iv««f, ib. p. 351. 17 substance witli Him," '' the one Body and one Flesh of Christ'";"' and He the Eternal Son and (Jod the Word in us, " conuiiingled" and co-united witli us," with our bodies as with our soul?, ])reservinr some finu- pa-st, restored weekly Pommnnion. 30 to receive the Gift He won for us, or Himself Who is the Giver and the Gift. Nor has this been ever thus ; even a century and a half ago, this Cathedral was remarked as one of those, where, after the desolation of the Great Rebellion, weekly Communions were still celebrated \ But, however we may see that our present decay and negligence should not continue, restoration must not be rashly compassed. It is not a matter of obeying rubrics, but of life or death, of health or decay, of coming together for the better or for the worse, to salvation or to con- demnation. Healthful restoration is a work of humility, not to be essayed as though we had the disposal of things, and could at our will replace, what by our forefathers' negligence was lost, and by our sins bound up with theirs is yet forfeited. Sound restoration must be the gift of God, to be sought of Him in humiliation, in prater, in mutual forbearance and charity, with increased strictness of life and more diligent use of what we have. We must consult one for the other. There is, in our fallen state, a reverent abstaining from more frequent Communion, founded on real though undue fears; there is and ought to be a real consciousness that more frequent Communion should involve a change of life, = Archdeacon Grenville to Sir Wm. Dugdale, in Life and Correspondence of Sir Wm. Dugdale, p. 429, 30. Letter 174, A.D. 1683. " I am informed that his Grace my Lord of Canterbury hath determined on the setting up a weekly Celebration of the Holy Communion, according to the Rubric, in the Church of Canterbury, and that my Lord Archbishop of York is likewise doing the same in his Cathedral, and that they are both writing letters to the Bishops within their Provinces, to follow their example ; a noble work of piety, which will prove to their everlasting honour, and very much facilitate conformity in the land, which hath been very much wounded by the bad example of Cathedrals, which have (for the most part) authorized the breach of law, in omitting the weekly celebration of the Eucharist, which hath not been constantly cckbrated on Sundays in any Cathedral but Christ Church, Ely, and "Worcester," [Archdeacon Grenville was a son-in-law of Bp. Cosins, and " maintained" for many years the " order which Bishop Cosins had restored," until 1688, when he resigned his preferment, and went into exile, ib. p. 431 and 229, note.] 31 Inore collectedness in God, more retireineiil, at times, from sotiet), deeper consciousness of His Presence, more saered- ness in our ordinary actions wlioni He so voucl)>atVtli to hallow, frreater love for \[\s Passion which we celehrate, and carrying it about, in strictness of self-rule and self- tlisci|)line, and self-denying love. And these graces, we know too well, come slowly. Better, then, for a time forego what any would long for, or obtain it, where by God's bounty and Providence that Gift may be had, than by })remature urgency, " walk not charitably," or risk injury to a brother's soul. He Who alone can make more frecjuent Communion a blessing, and Who gave such strength to that one heavenly meal, whereby through forty days and forty nights of pilgrimage lie carrietl Khjah to His Presence at the Mount of God, can, if we be faithful and keep His Gift which we receive, give such abundant strength to our rarer Communions, that they shall carry us through our forty years of trial unto His own Holy Hill, and the \'ision of Himself in bliss. Rather should those who long for it, fear that if It were given them, they might not be fitted for it, or, if we have it, that we come short of the fulness of its blessing, than use inconr^iderate eagerness in its restoration. Ask we it of God, so will lie teach us, how to obtain it of those whom He has made its dispensers to us. They too have their responsibilities, not to bestow it prematurely, though they be involved in the common loss. Ijct us each suspect ourselves, not others ; the backward their own backwardness, the forward tlieir own eagerness; each habitually interpret well the other's actions and motives; they wiio seek to partake more often of the heaveidy Pood, honour the reverence and huniility which abstains, and they who think it reverent tt) abstain, censure not as innovation, the return to ancient devotion and love; restore it, if we may, at such an hour of tlu- day, when to be absent need not cause pain or perplexity, 32 and may make least distinction ; so, while we each think all good of the other, may we all together, strengthened by the Same Bread, washed by the Same Blood, be led, in the unity of the Spirit and the bond of peace and holiness of life, to that ineffable Feast, where not, as now, in Mysteries, but, face to face, we shall ever see God, and be ever filled with His Goodness and His Love. Meantime such of us, as long to be penitents, may well feel that we are less than the least of God's mercies ; that we have already far more than we deserve ; (for whereas we deserved Hell, we have the antepast of Heaven;) that the children's bread is indeed taken and given unto dogs ; that He, Who is undefiled, spotless, separate from sinners, Cometh to be a guest with us sinners ; and therein may we indeed find our comfort and our stay. For where He is, how should there not be forgiveness and life and peace and joy ? What other hope need we, if we may indeed hope that we thereby dwell in Him and He in us. He in us, if not by the fulness of His graces, yet with such at least as are fitted to our state, cleansing our iniquities and healing our infirmities, Himself the forgiveness we long for; we in Him, in Whom if we be found in that Day, our pardon is for ever sealed, ourselves for ever cleansed, our iniquity forgiven, and our sin covered. EXTRACTS From some IV r Hers in mir later Knylish Church on th doctrine <>/' the Holy Euchorist. HouiHy on the Sdcranient, " Thus much we imist be sure to liold, that in the Supper of the Lord there is no vain ceremony, no bare sign, no untrue figure of a thing absent: Bul^ as the Scripture saith, ttic Table of the Lord, tlie Bread and Cup of the Lord, the memory of Christ, the annunciation of His death, yra, the communion of the Body and Blood of thr Lord, in a marvellous incorporation, ivhich by the operation of the Holy Ghost {the very bond of our conjunction with Christ) is through faith wrought in the souls of the faithful, whereby not only their souls live to eternal life, but thry surely trust to win their bodies a resurrection to immortality. The true understanding of this fruition and union, which is betwixt the body and the Head, betwixt the true believers and Christ, the ancient Catholic Fathers both perceiving themselves, and com- mending to their people, were not afraid to call this Supper, some of them, the salve of immortality and sovereign preservative against death; other, a deifical communion; other, the sweet dainties of our Saviour, the pledge of eternal health, the defence of faith, the hope of the resurrection; other, the food of immor- tality, the healthful grace, and the conservatory to everlastinjf life." " It is well known that the meat we seek for in this Supper is spiritual food, the nourishment of our soul, a heavenly refection, and not earthly ; an invisible meat, and not bodily; a ghostly substance, and not carnal; so that to think that without faith we may enjoy the eating and drinking thereof, or that that is the fruition of it, is but to dream a gross carnal feeding, basely objecting and binding ourselves to the elements and creatures. Whereas, by the advice of the Council of Nicene, we ought to lift up our minds by faith, and, leaving these inferior and earthly things, there seek it, where the Sun of righteousness ever shineth. n 34 lUdlef/. Take thea this lesson, O thou that art desirous of this Table, of Emissenus, a godly father, that when thou goest up to the reverend Communion, to be satisfied with spiritual meats, thou look up with faith upon the holy Body and Blood of thy God, thou marvel with reverence, thou touch it with the mind, thou receive it with the band of thy hearty and thou take it fully with thy inward man." Bishop Ridley. *' Both you and I agree herein, that in the Sacrament is the very, true, and natural Body and Blood of Christ; even that Which was born of the Virgin Mary; Which ascended into heaven; Which sits on the right hand of God the Father; Which shall come from thence to judge the quick and the dead; only we differ in modo, in the way and manner of being. We confess all one thing to be in the Sacrament, and dissent in the manner of being there. T, being by God's word fully thereunto persuaded^ confess Christ's natural Body to be in the Sacrament indeed by spirit and grace, because that whosoever receiveth worthily that Bread and Wine, receiveth effectually Christ's Body and drinketh His Blood (that is, be is made effectually partaker of His passion); and you make a grosser kind of being enclosing a natural, a lively, and a moving body, under the shape or form of Bread and Wine. Now this difference considered, to the question thus I answer, that in the Sacrament of the Altar is the natural Body and Blood of Christ vere et realiteVj indeed and really, for spiritually by grace and efficacy; for so every worthy receiver receiveth the very true Body of Christ, But if you mean really and indeed, so that thereby you would include a lively and a moveable body under the forms of bread and wine, then, in that sense, is not Christ's Body in the Sacrament really and indeed?" " Always my protestation reserved, I answer, thus; that in the Sacrament is a certain change, in that that Bread, which was before common bread, is now made a lively presentation of Christ's Body, and not only a figure, but etfectuously representeth His Body ; that even as the mortal body was nourished by that visible bread, so is the internal soul fed with the heavenly food of Christ's Body, which the eyes of faith see, as the bodily eyes see only bread. Such a Sacramental mutation I i^rant to he in the Bread and Wine, which truly is no small change, but such a change as no mortal man can make, but only that omnipotency of Christ's word." Works, edit. 18 iL p. '274. '* Think not because I disallow that Presence which the first proposition maintaineth (as a presence which I take to be forced, phantastical, and beside the authority of (iod's word, perni- ciously broufjht into the Church by the Romanists,) that I there- fore go about to take away the true Presence of Christ's Body in His Supper rightly and duly ministered, which is grounded upon the word of God, and made more })lain by the commen- taries of the faithful Fathers. They that tliink so of me, the Lord knoweth how far they are deceived. And to make the same evident unto you, I will in few words declare what True Presence of Christ's Body in the Sacrament of the Lord's Sujiper I hold and afhrm, witli the word of (iod, and the ancient Fathers. *' I say and confess with the Evangelist Luke, and with the Apostle Paul, that the Bread on the which tiianks are given is the Body of Christ in the remembrance of Ilim and Ilis death, to be set forth perpetually of the faithful until His coming. *' I say and confess the Bread which we break to be the communion and partiiking of Christ's Body with the ancient and the faithful Fathers. " I say and believe, that there is not only a signification of Christ's Body set forth by the Sacrament, but also that tiiercwith is given to the godly and faithful the grace of Christ's Body. that is, the food of life and immortality, anrl tiiis I hold with Cyprian. '■ I say also with St. .Augustine, that we eat life and we drink life; with Emissene, that we feel the Lord to be present in grace; with .\thanasius, that we receive celestial food which Cometh from above; the j)roperty of natural communion, with Hilary"; the nature of flesh and benediction wliich giveth life, in Bread and Wine, with Cyril ; and with the same Cyril', the virtue of the very Flesli of Christ, life and grace of Hi^ Body, ' Th«* passage quoted at more length in tin- Sortnon, |>. I. J. '' See Srrmnn, p 7. n. i. &<■. 36 Bilson. Hooker. the property of the Only-Begotten, that is to say, life, as He Himself in plain words expoundeth it. '' I confess also with Basil, that we receive the mystical advent and coming of Christ, grace, and the virtue of His very nature; the Sacrament of His very Flesh, with Ambrose; the Body by grace, with Epiphanius; spiritual flesh, but not that which was crucified, with Jerome; grace flowing into a sacri- fice, and the grace of the Spirit, with Chrysostom; grace and invisible verity, grace and society of the members of Christ's Body, with Augustine. " Finally with Bertram, (who was the last of all these,) I confess that Christ's Body is in the Sacrament in this respect; namely, as he writeth, because there is in it the Spirit of Christ, that is, the power of the Word of God, which not only feedeth the soul, but also cleanseth it. Out of these I suppose it may clearly appear unto all men, how far we are from that opinion, whereof some go about falsely to slander us to the world, saying, we teach that the godly and faithful should receive nothing else at the Lord's table, but a figure of the Body of Christ." P. 201, 202. Bishop Bilsov^ {quoted hij Bishop Mountagu,) " The disagreement is only in de modo praesentiae, the thing is yielded to on either side, and there is in the Holy Eucharist a real Presence. ' God forbid,' saith Bishop Bilson, ' we should deny that the Flesh and Blood of Christ are truly present and truly received of the faithful at the Lord's table. It is the doctrine that we teach others, and comfort ourselves withal." (P- 779 of the subject.) Appeal, c. SO Init. p. 289. See also Bp. White, below, p. 57- Hooker. " Being assembled for no other cause which they could imagine but to have eaten the Passover only that Moses appointeth, when they saw tiieir Lord and Master with hands and eyes lifted up to heaven first bless and consecrate for the endless good of all generations till the world's end the chosen elements of Bread and Wine, which elements made for ever the instruments of life by virtue of His Divine benediction, they being the first that were commanded to receive from Him, the first which were Hooker. 37 warranted by His promise that not only unto them at the present time but to whomsoever they and their successors after them did duly administer the same, those Mysteries should serve as conducts of life and conveyances of His Body and Blood unto them, was it possible they should hear that voice, ** Take, eat, this is My Body; drink ye all of this, this is My Blood;" possible that doing what was required and believing what was ])ronused, the same should have present eftect in them, and not fill them with a kind of fearful admiration at the heaven which they saw in themselves? They had at that time a sea of comfort and joy to wade in, and we by that which they did are taught that this heavenly food is given for the satisfying of our empty souls, and not for the exercising of our curious and subtile wits." '* If we doubt what those admirable words may import, let him be our teacher for the meaning of Christ to whom Christ was Himself a schoolmaster, let our Lord's Apostle be His interpreter, content we ourselves with His explication, My Body, the Communion of My Body, My Blood, the Communion of My Blood. Is there any thing more expedite, clear, and easy, than that as Christ is termed our Life because through Him we obtain life, so the parts of this Sacrament are His Body and Blood, for that they are so to us who receiving them receive that by them which they are termed? The Bread and Cup are His Body and Blood, because they are causes instrumental, upon the receipt whereof ihe participation of His Body and Blood ensucth. For that which produceth any certain effect is not vainly nor improperly said to be that very effect whereunto it teiuieth. Every cause is in the efVect which groweth from it. Our souls and bodies quickened to eternal life are effects, the cause whereof is the Person of Christ, His Body and Blood are the true well- spring out of which this life flowtth. So that His Body and Blood are in that very subject whereunto they minister life not only by effect or operation, even as the influence of the heavens is in plants, beasts, men, and in every thing which they quicken, but also by a far more divine and mystical kind of union, which maketh us one with Him even as He and the Father are one." I'ook V. chap. Ixvii. §. 4, .0. *' It is on all sides plainly confessed, first, that this Sacrament is a true and a real participation of Christ, who thereby imparteth 38 Hooker, Himself, even His whole entire Person, as a mystical Head unto every soul that receiveth Him, and that every such receiver doth thereby incorporate or unite himself unto Christ as a mystical member q/'Him, yea of them also whom He acknowledgeth to be His own; secondly, that to whom the Person of Christ is thus communicated, to them He giveth by the same Sacrament His Holy Spirit to sanctify them as it sanctifieth Him which is their Head ; thirdly, that what merits force, or virtue soever there zs in His sacrificed Body and Blood, we freely, fully, and wholly have it by this Sacrament; fourthly, that the effect thereof in us is a real transmutation of our soids and bodies from sin to righteousness, from death and corruption to immortality and life; fifthly, that because the Sacrament being of itself but a corruptible and earthly creature, must needs be thought an unlikely instrument to work so admirable effects in man, we are therefore to rest ourselves altogether upon the strength of His glorious power, Who is able and will bring to pass, that the Bread and Cup which He giveth us shall be truly the thing He promiseth. " It seemeth therefore much amiss, that against them whom they term Sacramentaries, so many invective discourses are made all running upon two points, that the Eucharist is not a bare sign or figure only, and that the efficacy of His Body and Blood is not all we receive in this Sacrament. For no man having read their books and writings which are thus traduced can be ignorant that both these assertions they plainly confess to be most true. They do not so interpret the words of Christ as if the name of His Body did import but the figure of His Body, and to be were only to signify His Blood. They grant that these holy mysteries received in due manner do instrumenlally both make us partakers of the grace of that Body and Blood which were given for the life of the world, and besides also impart unto us even in true and real though mystical manner the very Person of our Lord Himself, whole, perfect, and entire, as hath been shewed." Hook v. chap. Ixvii. §. 7, 8. '* He which hath said of the one Sacrament, * Wash, and be clean,' hath said concerning the other likewise, * Eat, and live.* If therefore, without any sucli particular and solemn warrant as this is, that poor distressed woman coming unto Christ for health }{nokor. 39 could so constantly resolve herself, * may I but touch the skirt of Mis garment I shall be whole,' what moveth us to argue of the manner how life should come by bread, our duty being here but to take what is offered, and most assuredly to rest persuaded of this, that cau we but eat we are safe? When I behold with mine eyes some small and scarce discernible grain or seed whereof nature maketh promise that a tree shall come, and wlien after- wards of that tree any skilful artificer undertakelh to frame some exquisite and curious work, I look for the event, I move no question about performance, either of the one or of the other. Shall I simply credit nature in things natural, shall I in things artificial rely myself on art, never offering to make doubt, and in that which is above both art and nature refuse to believe the Author of both, except He acquaint me with His ways, and lay the secret of His skill before me? Where God Himself doth speak those ihings which either for height and sublimity of matter, or else for secresy of performance we are not able to reach unto, as we may be ignorant without danger, so it can be no disgrace to con- fess we are ignorant. Such as love piety will as much as in them lieth know all things that God commandeth, but especially the duties of service which they owe to God. As for His dark and hidden works, they prefer as becometh them in such cases sim- plicity of faith before that knowledge, which curiously sifting what it should adore, and disputing too boldly of that which the wit of man cannot search, chilleth for the most part all warnjth of zeal, and bringeth soundness of belief many times into great hazard. Let it therefore be sufficient for me, presenting myself at the Lord's Table, to know what there I receive from Him, with- out searching or inquiring of the manner how Christ performeth flis promise; let disputes and questions, enemies to piety, abate- ments of true devotion, and hiiluMto in this cause but over patiently h^ard, let them take their rest; let curious and sharp- witted men beat their heads about what questions themselves will, the very letter of the word of Christ giveth plain security that these mysteries do as nails fasten us to His very Cross, that by them we draw out, as touching efficacy, force, and virtue, even the blood of His gored side, in the wounds of our Redeemer we there dip our tongties, we are dyed red both within and without, our hunger is satisfied and our thirst for ever quenched; they are things wonderful which he feeleth. great which he sceth, and 40 Hooker. Overall. unheard of which he uttereth, whose soul is possessed of this Paschal Lamb and made joyful in the strength of this new Wine, this Bread hath in it more than the substance which our eyes behold, this Cup hallowed with solemn benediction availeth to the endless life and welfare both of soul and body, in that it serveth as well for a medicine to heal our infirmities and purge our sins as for a sacrifice of thanksgiving, with touching it sanc- tifieth,it enlighteneth with belief, it truly conformeth us unto the image of Jesus Christ; what these elements are in themselves it skilleth not, it is enough that to me which take them they are the Body and Blood of Christ, His promise in witness hereof sufficeth. His word He knoweth which way to accomplish; why should any cogitation possess the mind of a faithful communicant but this, my God, Thou art true, O my soul, thou art happy !" Book V. chap. Ixvii. §. 12. " The power of the ministry of God translateth out of dark- ness into glory; it raiseth man from the earth, and bringeth God Himself down from heaven; by blessing visible elements it maketh them invisible grace; it giveth daily the Holy Ghost; it hath to dispose of that Flesh which was given for the life of the world, and that Blood which was poured out to redeem souls; when it pourelh malediction upon the heads of the wicked, they perish ; when it revoketh the same, they revive. O wretched blindness, if we admire not so great power ; more wretched if we consider it aright, and notwithstanding, imagine that any but God can bestow it! To whom Christ hath imparted power, both over that mystical body which is the society of souls and over that natural which is Himself, for the knitting of both in one, (a work which antiquity doth call the making of Christ's Body,) the same power is in such not amiss both termed a kind of mark or character, and acknowledged to be indelible." Book v. chap. Ixxvii. §. 1. Bishop Overall. ** So to eat the Flesh of Thy dear Son Jesus Christ, and to drink His Blood.] By this it may be known what our Church believeth, and teacheth of the Presence of Christ's Body and Blood in the Sacrament. And though our new masters would make the world believe she had another mind, yet we are not Orenill. A I to follow their private fancies, wiien we have b(» plain and so public a doctrine as tliis." " 'riidt ire ri'Ciiviiii/ fhcsc 'r/n/ rrea lures of Bread and li'ine,i^'c. mat/ be fnirtukers of His hiessed lUnhj and Jilood] Together with the hallowed elements of the Bread and Wine, we may receive the Body and Blood of Christ, which are truly exhi- bited in this Sacrament, the one as well as the other. " These words, as I once conferred with a Papist, were mi«jhtily excepted ap^ainst, because forsooth they must acknow- ledge no Bread and Wine, but a desition of the nature and being of both. My answer was, that here we term them so before consecration ; after that we call them so no more, but abstain from that name, because our thoughts might be wholly taken up with the spiritual food of Christ's Body and Blood. So in the Thanksgiving following we say, Thai hast vouchsafed to feed us with these holy Mysteries, and the spiritual food of the Bodi/ and Blood of Thy Son, lSv. In the meanwhile we ileny not the Bread and Wine to remain there still as God's creatures. And I wonder the Papists should so contend for this same desitio pani'i et vini, whenas in their own service or mass, they abstain not from these words, thy creatires, after consecration, as we do. See the book, peii quem omnia domine bone creas! A certain argument that the Cliurch of Rome never meant to teach that doctrine, which private men, the late doctors and schoolmen, have brought up and propagated." " 'These holy .][ystcrics were the .'■f>irltual food of the most precious Body and Blood, &c.] Before consecration, we called them God's creatures of Bread and Wine, now we do so no more after consecration; wherein we have the advantage of the Church of Ivome, who call them still creatures in their very mass after consecration; and yet they will be upbraiding us for denying the Real Presence, whenas we believe better than they: for after consecration we think no more of liread and Wine, but have our thoughts taken up wholly with the Body of Christ; and therefore we keep ourselves to these words only, abstaining from the other (though the Bread remain there still, to the eye,) whicli they do not. And herein we follow the Fathers, who after consecration would not suffer it to be cal'ed Bread and W incany longer, but the Body and Blood of Christ. ** Very Members Incorporate.^ So Cyril, in Catech. My.s!. 4. Sumptn Corpore ct Snnipiinc Chrisli nit nns fieri rvrvti/Acvf, i. r. 42 Overall. ejusdem Corporis cum Christo,ct inter nos truyec/ftovi, i.e. ejiisdem Sanguinis. *' And he also heirs through hope.] So the ancient Fathers were wont to prove the article of our resurrection by the nature of this very Sacrament. They use this reason to exhort the people unto the frequent receiving of the Holy Communion; because they say it is, (pu^f/.oixov uQxvxa-lag, Medicamentitm Ijnmor- talitatis ct Antidotum, to ,w^ ^xnlv, An antidote not to die; which if the men of this age ^vould but set their hearts on, as they did, we should not have them set so slightly by the Sacrament as they do." " Bread and Wine.] It is confessed by all Divines, that upon the words of the Consecration, the Body and Blood of Christ is really and substantially present, and so exhibited and given to all that receive it, and all this not after a ph3^sical and sensual, but after an heavenly and incomprehensible manner. But there yet remains this controversy among some of them, whe- ther the Body of Christ be present only in the use of the Sacrament, and in the act of eating, and not otherwise. They that hold the affirmative, as the Lutherans (in Confess. Sax.) and all Calvinists, do seem to me to depart from all Antiquity, which place the presence of Christ in the virtue and benedic- tion used by the Priest, and not in the use of eating the Sacrament. — And this did most Protestants grant and profess at first, though now the Calvinists make Popish magic of it in their licentious blasphemy." Additional Notes to the Book of Common Prayer. " What is the imvard part or thing signified P'~\ I cannot see where any real difference is betwixt us about this Real Presence, if we could give over the study of contradiction, and under- stand one another aright." Catechism. " In the Sacrament of the Eucharist, or the Lord's Supper, tJie Body and Blood of Christ, and therefore the whole of Christ is verily and indeed present, and is verily partaken by us, and verily combined with the Sacramental signs, as being not only significative, but exhibitory; so that in the liread duly given and received, the Body of Christ is given and received; in the Wine given and received, the Blood of Christ is given and received; and thus there is a communion of the whole of Christ, in the communion of the Sacrament." Probably, had Overall lived before the tenth century, he Morion. AntliciiiS. 4^3- would have ihouirht he had suflieieiitly stated his belief, in the above expressions ; but placed as he was in other circumstances, it was expedient for him, not only to maintain ancient truth, but to protest ajjjainst erroneous innovation : he therefore added tiiese words : — ** Vet not in any bodily, gross, earthly manner, as by tran- subst;mtiation,or consubsUmtiation, or any like devices of human reason, but in a mystical, heavenly, and spiritual manner, as is riglitly laid flown in our Articles." [As (jaotal (ind Irnnslafvd in Knox's Remains, vol. ii. p. l63.) Jh'sltop A for ion. *' The question is not absolutely concerning a Ileal Presence, which Protestants (as their own Jesuits witness) do also pro- fess Whicii acknowledgment of our adversaries may servo to stay the contrary clamours and calumnious accusations, wherein they use to range Protestants with those heretics who denied that the true Body of Christ was in the Eucharist, and maintained only a figure and image of Christ's Body, seeing that our difference is not about the truth or reality of presence, but about the true manner of the being and receiving thereof." — t'a- tholic Appeal, p. 93. ed. 1610. Bishop Andrewcs. " The Cardinal is not, unless * willingly, ignorant,' that Christ hath said, ' This is My Body,' not * This is not My Body in this mode' Now about the ol)ject we are both agreed ; all the con- troversy is about the ynodc. The * This is,' we firmly believe; that ' it is in this mode' (tlie l>reatl, namely, being transub- stantiated into the Body), or of the mode whereby it is wrought that • it is,' whether in, or luitli, or under, or transubstantiated, there is not a word in the Gospel. And because not a word is tiiere, we rightly detach it from being a matter of faith; we may place it amongst the decrees of the schools, not among the articles of faith. What Durandus is reported to have said of old, (Neand. Synop. Chron. p. 203.) we approve of. ' We hear the word, feel the effect, know not the manner, believe the Presence.* The Presence, I say, we believe, and that no less true than yourselves. Of the mode (»f tiio Presence, we define nothing rashly, nor, I add, do wc curiously en(piire; no more than how 44 Andrewes. the Blood of Christ cleanseth us in our Baptism ; no more than how in the Incarnation of Christ the human nature is united into the same Person with the Divine. We rank it among Mysteries, (and indeed the Eucharist itself is a mystery,) ' that which remaineth, ought to be burnt with fire.' (Ex. xii. 13.) that is, as the Fathers elegantly express it, to be adored by faith, not examined by reason." Answer to Bellarmine, c. i. p. 11. "To conclude; not only thus to frame meditations and resolutions, but even some practice too, out of this act of * ap- prehension.' It is very agreeable to reason, saith the Apostle, that we endeavour and make a proffer, if we may by any means, to ' apprehend' Him in His, by Whom we are thus in our nature ' apprehended,' or, as He termeth it, * comprehended,' even Christ Jesus; and be united to Him this day, as He was to us this day, by a mutual and reciprocal ' apprehension.' We may so, and we are bound so ; vere dignum et just am est. And we do so, so oft as we do with St. James lay hold of, * apprehend,' or receive insitum Verbum, the * Word which is daily grafted into us.' For * the Word' He is, and in the word He is received by us. But that is not the proper of this day, unless there be another joined unto it. This day Verbum caro factum est, and so must be ' apprehended' in both. But specially in His flesh as this day giveth it, as this day would have us. Now ' the Bread which we break, is it not the par- taking of the Body, of the Flesh, of Jesus Christ?" It is surely ; and by it and by nothing more are we made partakers of this blessed union. A little before He said, ' Because the children were partakers of flesh and blood. He also would take part with them.* INIay not we say the same ? Because He hath so done, taken ours of us, we also ensuing His steps will participate with Him and with His Flesh which He hath taken of us. It is most kindly to take part with Him in that which He took part in with us, and that, to no other end, but that He might make the receiving of it by us a means whereby He might * dwell in us, and we in Him ;' He taking our flesh, and we receiving His Spirit ; by His flesh which He took of us receiving His Spirit which He imparteth to us ; that, as He by ours became consors humancB naturcp, so we by His might become consortes Divince naturcBy ' partakers of the Divine nature.' Verily, it is the most straight and perfect • taking hold' that is. No union so Andre wen, 45 knitteth as it. Not consanguinity ; brethren fall out. Not marriage ; man and wife are severed. But that which is nourished, and the nourishment whorcwitli — they never are, never can be severed, but remain one for tver. With this act then of mutual ' taking,' taking of His flesh as lie hath taken ours, let us seal our duty to Him this day, for takinf>- not • Angels/ l)ut * the seed of Abraham.' " Serm. I. on Xalivity, Works, vol. i. p. 16. ** He is given us, as Himself saith, as ' the living Bread from Heaven,' which Bread is His ' flesh' born this day, and after * given for the life of the world.' For look how we do give back that He gave us, even so doth lie give back to us that which we gave Him, that which He had of us. This He gave for us in Sacrifice, and this He giveth us in the Sacrament, that the Sacrifice may by the Sacrament be truly applied to us. And let me commend this to you ; He never bade, accipitey plainly ' take,' but in this only ; and that, because the effect of this day's union is no ways more lively represented, no way more effectually wrought, than by this use." Sow. If. on Kativity, vol, i. p. 30. " And I may safely say it with ^ood warrant, from those words especially and chiefly, which, as He Himself saith of them, are " spirit and life/' even those words, which joined to the element make the blessed Sacrament. " There was good proof made of it this day. All the way did He preach to them, even till they came to Kmmaus, and their hearts were hot within them, which was a good sign: but their eyes were not opened but " at the breaking of bread/' and then they were. That is the best and surest sense we know, and therefore most to be accounted of There we taste, and there we see ; " taste and see how gracious the Lord is." There we are made to " drink of the Spirit," there our " hearts are strengthened and stiblished with grace." There is the Blood which shall " purge our consciences from dead works," whereby we may " die to sin." There the Bread of (iod, which sh.dl endue our souls with much strength ; yea, multiply strength in them to live unto (Jodi yea, to live to Him continu.jlly ; for he that " eateth His flesh and driiiketh His blood, dwellelh in Christ, and Christ in him ;" not inneth, or sojourneth for a tiin<*. hilt dwdlcth (•nntimi.illv. \ii(l. novrr ran we more -lo Andy ewes. truly, or properly say in Chrislo Jesu Domino noslro, as when we come new from that holy action, for then He is in us, and we in Him indeed." Serm. I. on the Resurrection, p. 204, 5. '' If such a new consecrating we need, what better time than the feast of first-fruits, the sacrificing time under the Law ? and in the Gospel, the day of Christ's rising, our first-fruits, by Whom we are thus consecrate ? The day wherein He was Himself restored to the perfection of His spiritual life, the life of glory, is the best for us to be restored in to the first fruits of that spiritual life, the life of grace. " And if we ask, what shall be our means of this consecrating? The Apostle telleth us, we are sanctified by the " oblation of the Body of Jesus." That is the best means to restore us to that life. He hath said it, and shewed it Himself; " He that eateth Me, shall live by Me." The words spoken concerning that, are both " spirit and life," whether we seek for the spirit or seek for life. Such was the means of our death, by eating the forbidden fruit, the first-fruits of death ; and such is the means of our life, by eating the flesh of Christ, the first-fruits of life. " i\nd herein we shall very fully fit, not the time only and the means, but also the manner. For as by partaking the flesh and blood, the substance of the " first Adam," we came to our death, so to life we cannot come, imless we do participate with the flesh and blood of the " second Adam," that is, Christ. We drew death from the first, by partaking the substance; and so must we draw life from the second, by the same. This is the way ; become branches of the Vine, and partakers of His nature, and so of His life and verdure both." Serm. I J. p. 219, 20. " To end ; because we be speaking of a hope to be laid up in our bosom, it falleth out very fitly, that even at this time, festnm spei, the Church ofFereth us a notable pledge, and earnest of this hope there to bestow ; even the holy Eucharist, the flesh wherein our Redeemer was seen and suffered, and paid the price of our redemption; and together with it "the holy Spirit, whereby we are sealed to the great day of our redemption." To the laying up of which earnest of our hope, and interest in all these, we are invited at this time, even literally to lodge and lay it up in our bosom. We shall be the nearer our scio, if " we taste and see by it, how gracious the Lord is ;" the nearer our spero, if an earnest or pledge of it be laid up within us; the nearer our redemption, if we have within us the price of it; and Atnhcucs. 17 the nearer imr resurrection— llicy be 1 1 is own words, " Ht« that eatetli My flesli and (h-inketli, cS:c. hath eternal Hte, and 1 will raise him up at the last day." So dwell we in Him, and lie in us; we in Him by our flesh in Him, and He in us by His flesi) in us. Thereby drawing lite tVom Him the second, as we do death from the first Adam. " Serm. /'. p. 2(i8. " The Church by her ofJice, or agendum, doth her part to help us herein, all she may. The things we are willed to seek she sets before us, the blessed Mysteries. For these are from abo\ e ; the " Bread that came down from Heaven," the Blood tiiat hath been carried " into the holy place." And I add, uhi Christ its; for ubi Corpus, ubi Saiujuis Christi, ibi Chrisfus, I am sure. And truly here, if there be an ubi Cliristus, tliere it is. On earth we are never so near Ilim, nor He us, as then and there. There in cjjicacid, and when all is done, efficacy, that is it must do us good, must raise us here, and raise us at the last day to the right hand ; and the local ubi without it of rio value." Serm. VI II. vol. ii. p. o2I. *' But to be temples is not all, we are farther to be Tempi nni hoc, " this Temple ;" and this was '' the Temple of His Body." And that are we, if at any time, then certainly when as if we were temples in very deed, we prepare to receive, not the Ark of His j)resence, but Himself, that He may come into us and be in us ; which is at what time we present ourselves to receive His blessed Body and Blood ; that Body and that Blood wliich for our sakes was dissolved, dissolved three days since, when it suffered for our sins. And tliis day raised again, when it rose for our justification. ^' Which when we do, that is, receive this Body or this Temple, for Tempi uni hoc and Hoc est Corpus Meum are now come to be one, for both Templum hoc and Corpus hoc are in Tempi um corporis Sui; and when the temples of our body are in this Temple, and the Temjile of His Body in the temples of ours, then are tliere three Temples in one, a Trinity, the per- fectest number of all. Then if ever are we, not temples only, but Templa corporis Sui, * Temples of His Body,* and this Scripture fulfdled in us." Serm. X. vol. ii. p. 36'J. " in Christ this sign is a sign, not betokening only, but exhibiting also what it betokeneth, as the Sacraments do. For of signs, some shew only and work nothing; such was that of Jonas in itself, sed ccce plus if nam Jonas hir. For some other 48 Aitdrenes, there be that shew and work both — work what they shew, present us with what they represent, what they set before us, set or graft in us. Such is that of Christ. For besides that it sets before us of His, it is farther a seal or pledge to us of our own, that what we see in Him this day, shall be accomplished in our own selves, at His good time. " And even so pass we to another mystery, for one mystery leads us to another ; this in the text, to the holy mysteries we are providing to partake, which do work like, and do work to this, even to the raising of the soul with " the first resurrection." And as they are a means for the raising of our soul out of the soil of sin — for they are given us, and we take them expressly for the remission of sins — so are they no less a means also, for the raising our bodies out of the dust of death. The sign of that Body which was thus *' in the heart of the earth," to bring us from thence at the last. Our Saviour saith it totidem verbis, " Whoso eateth My flesh and drinketh My Blood, [ will raise him up at the last day." Serm. XII. p. 402, 3. '' The third place is St. Augustine, that Christ in these words had a farther meaning ; to wean her from all sensual and fleshly touching, and teach her a new and a true touch, truer than that she was about. This sense groweth out of Christ's reason : ' Touch Me not, for I am not yet ascended,' as if till He were ascended, He would not be touched, and then He would. As much as to say, ' Care not to touch Me here, stand not upon it, touch Me not till I be ascended ; stay till then, and then do. That is the true touch, that is it will do you all the good.' " And there is reason for this sense. For the touch of His Body which she so much desired, that could last but forty days in all, while He in His Body were among them. And what should all since, and we now, have been the better ? He was to take her out a lesson, and to teach her another touch, that might serve for all to the world's end; that might serve when the Body and bodily touch were taken from us. '' Christ Himself touched upon this point in the sixth chapter, at the sixty-second verse, when at Capernaum they stumbled at the speech of eating His flesh. '" What," saith He, " find you this strange, now.?* How will you find it then, when you shall see the Son of man ascend up where He was before?" How then? And yet then you must eat, or else there is no life in you. Andrcnes. Donxe. 40 " So it is a plain item to her, that there may be a sensual toucliing of 11 im here ; but that is not it, not the ri^ht. it avails little. It was her error this, she was all for the corporal presence, for the touch with the finfjers. So were His disciples, all of thfem, too much addicted to it. From which they were now to be weaned, that if they had before known Christ, or touched I i im after the fle^h, yet now from hcncetbrth they were to do so no more, but learn a new touch j to touch Him, being now ascended. Such a toiichino there is, or else His reason holds not; and best touchinu^ Him so, better far than this of hers she was so eager on." Scrm. XI'. on Rrsnr. vol. iii. p. 36. " As these are their (the Romanists) imaginations, so we want not ours. For many among us fancy only a Sacra- ment in this action, and look strange at the mention of a Sacri6ce; whereas we not only use it as a nourishment spiritual, as that it is too, but as a mean also to renew a ' covenant' with God by virtue of that • Sacrifice,' as the Psalmist speaketli. So our Saviour Christ in the institution tellelh us, in the twenty-second chapter of Luke and twentieth verse, and the Apostle, in the thirteenth chapter of Hebrews and tenth verse. And the old writers use no less the word Sacrifice than Sacra- ment, altar than table, offer tlian eat ; but both indifferendy, to shew there is both. *• And again too, that to a many with us it is indeed so f radio panis, diS it is that only and nothing beside ; whereas the ' IJiead which we break is the partaking of Christ's true * Body' — and not of a sign, figure, or remembrance of it. For the Church hath ever believed a true fruition of the trtie Body of Ctirist in that Sacrament." vol. v. p. 66, 6?. /);•. DotntP. " Rut yet, thouf^h this llread be not fo transubstantiate 1, we refuse not the w ords of the Fathers, in which they have ex- pressed themselves in this mystery. Not Irencviis his ' est corpus,' that that {{read is His Body now. Not 'I'ertullian's 'fecit corpus^' that that Bread is made His Body which was not so before. Not St. Cypri.in's 'mut'ifus' that that Bread is chanijcd. Not Damascene's '.vf//>cr//rt/f/rrt//7rr7;iM/«/»/.9,' that that iheadisnotonly changed so in the use, as when at the King's table certain por- tions of l)read are made bread of e«say, to pas<» over every dish F. 50 Donne. Jackson. whether for safety or for majesty ; not only so civilly changed^ but changed supernaturally. No nor Theophylact's ' traiisforma- tus est,' (which seems to be the word that goes farthest of all,) for this transforming cannot be intended of the outward form and fashion, for that is not changed, but be it of that internal form which is the very essence and nature of the Bread, so it is transformed, so the Bread hath received a new form, a new essence, a new nature, because whereas the nature of bread is but to nourish the body, the nature of this Bread now is to nourish the soul. And therefore cum non duhitav'it Doniinus dicers, ' Hoc est Corpus Meum cum signum daret corporis, since Christ forbore not to say, " This is My Body," when He gave the sign of His Body, why should we forbear to say of that Bread, This is Christ's Body, which is the sacrament of His Body?" 80 Sermons, ed. 1640, p. 37. 4th Serm. on the Nativity. Jackson. " This is a point, which every Christian is bound expressly to believe, that God the Father, doth neither forgive sins, nor vouchsafe any term or plea of reconciliation, but only for the merits and satisfaction n»ade by the sacrifice of the Son of God, who by the eternal Spirit offered Himself in our human nature upon the Cross. In the next place, we are to believe and acknowledge, that as God the Father doth neither forgive, nor vouchsafe reconciliation, but for the merits and satisfaction of His only Son ; so neither will He vouchsafe to convey this or any other blessing unto us, which His Son hath purchased for us, but only through His Son ; not only through Him as our Advocate or Intercessor, but through Him as our Mediator, that is, through His Humanity, as the Organ or Conduit, or as the only bond, by which we are united and reconciled unto the Divine Nature. For although the Holy Spirit or third Person in Trinity doth immediately and by Personal propriety work faith and other spiritual graces in our souls, yet doth He not by these spiritual graces unite our souls or spirits immediately unto Himself, but unto Christ's human nature. He doth as it were till the ground of our hearts, and make it fit to receive the seed of life ; but this seed of righteousness immediately flows from the Sun of Righteousness, whose sweet influence likewise it is, which doth immediately season, cherish, and ripen Jackson. 51 it. The Spirit of Life, whereby our adoption and election is sealed unto us, is the real participation of Christ's Hody, which was broken, and of Cl)rist's Blood, which was shed for us. This is the true and punctual meaning of our Apostle's speech, I Cor. XV. 45. " The first man Adam was made a liviny soul,'* or, as the Syriac hath it", animale corpus, an enlivened body; " but the second Adatn ivas made a quickening Spirit ;" and im- mediately becometh such to all those which as truly bear His image by the Spirit of Hepencration, which issues from Him, as they have borne the image of the first Adam by natural propa- gation ; and this again is the true and punctual meaning of our Saviour's words, John vi. 63. '* It is the Spirit that fjuickencth, the flesh projiteth nothing ; the words that I speak unto you are spirit and life." For so He had said in the verses before, to such as were offended at His words, '* What if you should see the Son of Man ascend up where He was before ?" The implication con- tained in the conne.xion between these two verses and the precedent is this ; That Christ's virtual presence, or the in- fluence of life, which His human nature was to distil from His heavenly throne, should be more profitable to such as were capable of it, than His bodily presence; than the bodily eating of His Flesh and Blood could be, although it had been convertible into iheir bodily substance. This distillation of life and immor- tality from His glorified human nature, is that, which the ancient and ortiiodoxal Church did mean in their figurative and lofty speeches of Christ's real Presence, or of eating His very Flesh, and drinking His very Blood in the Sacrament. And the Sacramental Bread is called His Body, and the Sacramental Wine His Blood; as for other reasons, so especially for this, that the virtue or influence of His bloody Sacrifice is most plen- tifully and most effectually distilled from Heaven unto the worthy receivers of the Eucharist." vol. iii. p. 3'27, 8. " All that are partakers of this Sacrament, eat Christ's Body and drink His Blood sacramen tally : that is, they eat that Bread which sacramentally is His Body, and drink that Cup which sacramentally is His Blood, whether they eat or drink faithfully or unfaithfully. For, all the Israelites (1 Cor. x.) drank of the same spiritual rock, which was Christ sacramentally : a// of them were partakers of His presence, when Mosrs smote the rock. Yet, with ♦' many of them, God was not well pleased," E 2 5*2 Jack SO) f. because they did not faithfully either drink or participate of His presence. And more displeased He is with such as eat Christ's Body and drink His Blood unworthily, though they eat and drink them sacramentally : for eating and drinking so onely, that is, without faith, or due respect_, they eat and drink to their own condemnation, because they do not discern, or rightly esteem, Christ's Body or Presence in the Holy Sacrament. '* May we say then, that Christ is really present in the Sacra- ment, as well to the unworthy as to the faithful receivers ? Yes, this we must grant, yet must we add withal, that he is really present with them in a quite contrary manner ; really present he is, because virtually present to both ; because the operation or efficacy of His Body and Blood is not metaphorical but real in both. Thus the bodily sun, though locally distant for its substance, is really present by its heat and light, as well to sore eyes, as to clear sights, but really present to both, by a contrary real operation ; and by the like contrary operation, it is really present to clay and to wax, it really hardeneth the one, and really softeneth the other. So doth Christ's Body and Blood, by its invisible, but real influence, mollify the hearts of such as come to the Sacrament with due preparation ; but harden such as unworthily receive the consecrated Elements. If he that will hear the word, must take heed how he hears, much more must he which means to receive the Sacrament of Christ's Body and Blood, be careful how he receives. He that will present himself at this great marriage-feast of the Lamb without a wedding garment, had better be absent. It was always safer, not to ap- proach the presence of God manifested or exhibited in extraor- dinary manner (as in His sanctuary or in the ark), than to make appearance before it in an unhallowed manner, or without due preparation. Now wijen we say, that Christ is really present in the Sacrament, our meaning is, that a^i God He is present in an extraordinary manner, after such a manner, as He was present (before His incarnation) in His Sanctuary the Ark of His Covenant; and by the power of His Godhead thus extraordi- narily present, He diftuseth the virtue or operation of His human nature, either to the vivification or hardening of their hearts, who re ceive the Sacramental pledges." vol. iii. p. 333, 4. Suit en. 68 Silt lit " There is a far better and safer course than to contend any longer, if men would at last set themselves on all parts to follow it ; wiiich is to reverence the Son of ( Jod in the unsearch- able mysteries of llis wisdom which are past finth'nir out ; and not to stand weiLjliing them in the liglit scales and balance of their own reason ; to draw a veil over them, or ;-ay with the woman of Samaria, J'uttus est altus, this well is deep, and so with pious hearts to reverence them, and no more ado. " j. When Ave have done striving, and even wearied ourselves in a thousand difficulties, brought our minds into a labyrinth of doubts, unless we will make controversies immortal, we must draw at last to an issue. " The faithful receive the blessed Sacrament Well, what do they receive.'* Certainly Christ Jesus, truly and really; to make iurther scruple is needless curiosity ; to give liglit cre- dence hereuTito, is in part incredulity. What the elements of Hread and Wine are in themselves, is one thing; that they are, being now consecrated to so holy a use, and received of the spiritually minded as the spiritual food of their souls, is another. What they are, I say, Christ's own words are sufficient warrant for a believing world unto the world's end. Wherefore, to be over-witted in seeking, or doubting how this should be, is no way agreeable to that faith and obedience that becometh Chris- tians. Renim absmtium (saith an ancient father) f)ras('iis est fiJes; reriim impo siltiliuni, pos.si/jilis est fides; of things absent, faith is present ; of things impossible, faith is possible. Vauem rules, vcrbum auilis ; Cut potius credisi' Sensiti, rel Christoi* Thou seest the Bread, thou heare^t the word ; to which rather dost thou give credit, whether to tliy sense, or to Christ? Cur lion potius ijaudesi* Quid (juaris;' Why dost thou not rather rejoice.^ Why dost thou question.'' " 0*. In this case, that of the blessed Virgin, spoken of ( hrist at the Marriage at Cana in Galilee, would be remembered ; Quodcuuijue dixcrit vobis, facile ; whatsoever He shall say unto you, do it. '* When the Serpent said unto Eve, Cur print pit robis Drus, ut HON coiuederetis ■' Wiiy hath Ciod commanded you not to eat? Had she answered, Scin quod prrerepit, unn spectat ad w inrrsfii/arr, rntanin fjuare prtfcepif ; I know lie hath com- 54 Sutton. manded me so ; to seek a reason why, or the cause wherefore, I need not, 1 ought not; — had she not done far better?" Godly Meditations on the Most Holy Sacrament of the Lord's Supper. Preface. " JO. And now that we may ingeniously confess that w^hich is a plain case in the sight of God, and not flourish over the truth with colours of rhetoric, or smother it with the clouds of deceit, we acknowledge that the dignity of this Sacrament is greater than words can express, yea, than the mind of man is able to conceive. If any will exact the efficacy of those five words, " For this is My Body," we answer. It is a great mys- tery. "11. Truly we give, and that justly, great respect and re- verence to the holy Eucharist; for whereas bread and wine are elements naturally ordained for the sustenance of the body, by the power of Divine benediction they do receive a virtue, that, being received of the faithful, they become nourishment of the soul, nay, they become means whereby we are sancti- fied both in body and soul, and are made the members of Christ. " 12. But Christ, some say, in express words calleth the Bread His Body, and the Wine His Blood : true, in express words also He calleth Himself a rock. Right well saith Eusebius Emisenus, " Comest thou to the Sacrament, consider there the Body and Blood of Christ: wonder at it with reverence, touch it with thy mind, receive it with the hand of thy heart; do not say as the Capernaites, " Master, how cam est thou hither.?" but, with the disciples, asking no question, be glad thou dost enjoy Him. He is honoured in this mystery, that was once offered upon the Cross. Yea, but how can this be, that Christ, sitting at the right hand of God in heaven, should dispose of His Body to us poor inhabitants of earth ? Take here the answer of the angel Gabriel, the Holy Ghost hath overshadowed it. " From hence," saith St. Bernard, " to search is temerity, to know is life eternal." " 13. Is it not a hard saying, " Unless ye eat the Flesh of the Son of God," &c.? It is a hard saying to them that are hard of believing. The disciples hearing that of their Lord and Master, " Take, eat, this is My Body," they take, they eat, ask- ing no question. " Being confirmed in faith," saith St. Chry- sostom, '* they take and eat; unbelievers hearing the same of Sutton. *-'^ our Saviour, they depart, they eat not. " Peter answereth, " Lord, Thou hast the words of life;" others pfo backward, leaving the Lord of life. The Capernaite, hearin*?, dreameth of eatinfT naturally, c^rossly ; the goilly are assured of eating spiritually, and yet withal really. " 1 i. (ireat was the authority of Pytliaijoras amongst ills scholars ; if lie said it, they were silent ; but greater was, and is, and ought to bi', the authority of Chri-t with believers ; He saith it, and they believe. The sun remains a splendent body, though bats and owls cannot endure it: tlie holy Sacrament remains an unspeakable mystery, though the carnal man doth not perceive it. In this case, silence is the safest eloquence, and the best expressing is not to express. A godly meditation is safer than a Socratical disputing Discourse of controversy doth often abate devotion: discourse of piety about this mys- tery is sweeter than the honey or the honey-comb. *' 15. The Passover, wiiich Christ kept with His disci])les, was prepared in an upper room. When men brought unto Him a man sick of the palsy, they, in letting down the sick, un- covered the roof of the house. The harder parts of the Pas- chal Lamb were consumed by fire. Mysteries are, if not con- trary, yet often above reason. Well saith St. Cyril, in his third book against Julian, " If human reason waver in things sen- sible, how much more shall it do so in things beyond sense? Faithless Julian ! what if the creation of the angels excel human capacity, did not Moses well in forbearing to mention it.'' As- suredly he did well. What if it cannot by reason be conceived how Christ, sitting at the table, should give Himself to His, for sustenance, wilt thou, therefore, by and by, imagine this or that change? " Let us rather honour Chrl>t in His mysteries, praise IHm for His mercies, be thankful unto Him for His benefits. Those things which we comprehend let us admire; those which we cannot comprehend, let us more admire: though words l)e wanting what to expres*?, let not f.iith be wanting what to believe" Ih. p. 287— ^fJL " S\. Well saith Fulgentius, against the Arians, 'True faith hath never superfluous, but it ever had and hath, just reasons.' So also St. Cyrils mysteries are otfered to believers, not to questioners. ** .S2. .Albeit then, the manner be not of us o\-er curiously 56 Silt Ion. inquired or searched after, yet the same presence of Christ is acknowledged which Christ Himself would have to be acknow- ledged. We say with St. Ambrose, that there is not taken from bread the substance thereof, but that there is adjoined the grace of Christ's Body after a manner ineffable. " 33. It was no other but a shadow of this benefit that was of old given to the Jews in the ark of the covenant^ and yet Solomon did so admire it, as that he said, ' And is it credible that God should dwell with men ?' " 34>. We often marvel and condemn the Jews, that, having Christ amongst them, they did not acknowledge and receive llira in that manner they ought to have done. Let us consider Christ among us, and invert that saying of the husbandmen, ' This is the heir,' let us take him, receive him, believe in him, ' and the inheritance shall be ours.' " 35. Last of all, concerning the controversy about the holy Eucharist, between two extremes, whereof we have heard, let us embrace the means, let us, Avith a sincere faith, apprehend the truth, apprehending, let us keep it, keeping, let us adore it with godly manners. '' 36. And now to draw in, as it were, the sails of this admo- nition, godly reader, seeing that this divine institution was left by our gracious Redeemer, both for the inward peace of the soul, and outward of the Church, who can sufficiently lament to see the dissention that hath miserably divided the Christian world, and discord that hath risen about the same! Let us call to mind, that God is not the God of dissention, but the God of peace. Let us all forbear on both sides need- less and unprofitable disputes. Unless Thou, Lord, hadst said it, " This is My Body, this is My Blood," who would have be- lieved it? Unless Thou hadst said, O holy Christ, " Take, eat, drink ye all of this," who durst have touched It? Who would have approached to so heavenly a repast, hadst Thou not com- manded it, hoc facile, do ye this; but Thou commanding, who would not joyfully come and communicate? " 37. Let us then hold captive human reason, and prepare ourselves unto the fruit of this heavenly manna. Unnecessary disputes bring small profits, we may with greater benefit won- der than argue. 1 hen are the works of <"od most truly con- ceived, when they are devoutly admired." Ih. p. 299 — SOL ♦' C onsider the divine Wisdom of the Son of God, who, re- spectin*,' our weakness, hath conveyed unto us I lis J)u(ly ami Blood alter a divine and spiritual manner, under the lorms of Bread and Wine. ' P. !2b'. liisjiojt \\'liilf\ {fjuotiih/ Uisltnp I^ilsou.) " The iiK/re learned Jesuits themselves acknowledp^e that Protestants believe the [leal Presence of Christ's Body and r.lood in the Holy Eucharist; and our Divines deliver their faith concernint. And, for the Church of I'n^laiui, nothiufr is more plain than tiiat it believes and leaches tiie true and real Presence of Christ in the ilucharist; unlci-s A. C. can make a body no body, and blood no blood. Nay, Bishop Ridley adds yet further, * That in the Sacrament is the very true and natural Body and Blood of Christ, that which was born of the V^irgin Mary, which ascended into heaven, which sitteth at the right hand of (iod the Father, which shall come from thence to judge the quick and the dead, ^c' " Luiars Conference w'dh Fisher, p. 2H6—2[)G. " And for the passages objected out of mine own Speech in Star-chamber; that they imply and necessarily infer the i*opish doctrine of Transubstantiation, and the giving of divine worship to the Altar, even the same that is given to God. I answer, that neither of these can be inferred from thence ; for my words only imply, that Christ's Body is truly and really present in the Sacrament ; yet not corporeally, but in a .spiritual manner, and so is received by us ; which is no more than Master Calvm himself affirms on the 1 Cor. xi. '^4. where thus he writes: AV Forba. " The doctrine of those Protestants and otiicrs seems most safe and true, who are of opinion, nay mo^t firmly believe, that the Body and Blood of Christ is truly, really, and substantially present in the Eucharist, and received but ii: a manner incom- prehensible in respect of human reason and ineffable, known to God alone, and not revealed to tn in the Scripture, not ror- 60 Forbes. Mede. poral, yet neither in the mind alone, or through faith alone, but in another way, known, as was said, to God alone, and to be left to His Omnipotence." Cons'id. Modest, de Euchar. I. i. 7. Mede. '' It abolishes the mystery of our consolation, and that whereby our faith is strengthened in the use of these holy signs, that mankind might have an interest in Christ, and what He should do on our behalf We know it w^as required He should be incarnate and take our nature upon Him, which now He hath done. Every one of us can believe that what He hath done is for the behoof of mankind ; and so some men shall be the better for it, since our whole kind by reason of His Incarnation is capable of the benefits of His Passion and the whole work of redemption. But in that though Christ became man, yet He took not upon Him the nature of every several man, hence no man from His Incarnation could apply these benefits unto himself in special : for he might say, indeed Christ was made man, and so man may be the better for Him, and have some interest in Him ; but since He was not incarnate into me, how should I apply this unto myself? Why therefore the all- wise God, who knew our weakness, hath so ordained in the mystery of this Holy Sacrament, that it is a mystical Incarnation of Christ into every one who receives it. Whence Gregory Nazianzen defines the Eucharist, KoivmU Iva-oie^xaa-iag lov Qiov, a Commiuiion of the Incarnation of God. For in that He atfirms the Bread to be His Body, and the Wine to be His Blood ; by receiving this Body and Blood of Christ, and so changing it into the substance of our body and into our blood by way of nourishment, the Body of Christ becomes our body, and His Blood is made our blood, and we become in a mystical manner flesh of His flesh and bone of His bone. And as in His conception of the Holy Virgin, He took upon Him the nature of man, that He might save man ; so in His Holy Sacrament He takes upon Him the nature of every man in singular, that He might save every man who becomes Him in the Divine Sacrament of His Body and Blood. His real Incarnation was only in one, but His mystical Incarnation in many : and hence comes this Sacrament to be an instrument whereby Christ is conveyed unto us. His benefits aj)plie(l, and so our faith confirmed." Disc. xlv. p. "254. ed. 1672. M('Je. 61 *' Now we know (Exod. xix. I'i) that no beast nii^ht touch the mountain when tlio Lord appeared on Mount Sinai: so none of those wlioni God accounts in the number of beasts (as all who have l)eastly aflfections) may approacli in Christ's presence, or come unto His table. " Wheretore, as (iod saith, be ye holy, because I am Holy ; so may it be said unto all communicants, be ye holy, because the Sacrament is holy. (Lev. xi. 44, &c.) Whence it was a worthy custom in the ancient Churches for the Bis)ion or Deacon to proclaim at the Holy Communion rot uym roii uyioii, holy things for them (hat arc holy, holding in his hand the Floly Sacraments. And good reason why ; for where this holiness is not, there, in stead of comfort, the heart is more and more corrupted. I'ven as the spider gets strength of poison from the sweetest herbs and flowers ; so the profane heart is strengthened in wickedness by receiving this holy and heavenly food. •* The heinousness of this sin is aggravated in respect of the thiiig received: for our Apostle elsewhere saith, the unworthy receiver becomes guilty of the Body and Blood of Christ, (1 Cor. xi. 27.) that is, he is guilty of oftering contumely, injury, and indignity unto Him. St. Paul, when he dissuades husbands from misusing their wives, gives this for a reason, no man ever yrt hated his own flesh : (Mph. v. 29.) and may not [ reason thus, let no man ofifer injury unto Christ, because He is flesh of our flosli ? yea He is our Head, and a wound or maim given to the head is more odious and dangerous than to another p-irt. To oft'er violence to a common person, is a fault; to strike a magistrate, a greater; but to wound a king, who is the Lord's anointed, is a sin in the highest degree. O what a heinous sin is it tiien to offer violence to, and as much as in us lies to strike and wound, tlie S.>n of Ood, tlio King of Kings and the Lord of Cilory ! '* To be guilty of death and shedding of the blood of any inrjocent man, is a fearful sin ; and this made David cry out. Deliver me, O Lord, from blood-guiltiness. (Psalm li. 1-1.) How fearful is it tiien to bn guilty of the Body and Blood of Christ ! Whose heart is not moved against the .lews, when he hears or reads their villanies and violence oft'ered to our Blessed Saviour ? Rut Chrysostom gives us a good take-heed. Take herd (saith he) lest thou hr quilttf in the Itke kind, by un- C2 3Ied€. Herbert. BramJtall. worthy receiving of the blessed Sacrament : he that defiles the King's body^ and he that tears it, offend both alike ; the Jews tore it, thou dejilest it. Here are (saitli the same Father) diversa peccata, sed par contitmelia ; some difference of the sin, but none of the contumely therein offered. *' Joseph and Nicodemus, their pious devotion in begging and embalming the Body of Christ, is worthily recorded and com- mended to all generations; Mary Magdalene in bestowing that box of precious ointment upon His holy Head hath gained to herself endless honour, instead of her former infamy : so if we receive and handle worthily this mystical Body of Christ, our portion shall be with honourable Joseph and pious Mary Mag- dalene ; our memories shall be as theirs, blessed, and our souls as theirs, to receive unspeakable comfort : but if we come unworthily, we join with Judas and the Jews, and are guilty, as they were, of the Body and Blood of Christ." Disc. xlv. p. 254, 257, 268. Herbert. Come ye hither all, whose taste Ts your waste; Save your cost and mend your fare, God is here prepared and drest, And the feast God in whom all dainties are. Come ye hither, all whom wine Doth define Naming you not to your good. Weep what ye have drunk amiss, And drink This Which before ye drink is Blood. The Invitation. God to shew how far His love Could improve. Here, as broken, is presented. The Banquet. Archbishop Branihall. " Having viewed all your strength with a single eye, I find not one of your arguments that comes home to Transubstan- tiation, but only to a true Real Presence; which no genuine Braniluill. 6S son of the Church of Eiif^laiul did ever deny, no, nor your adversary hiinselt. Christ said, " This is My Body;" what He said, we do stedfastly believe. He said not, after this or that manner, //cteriorinn, indiihitatani retinere fidem, et non quaMcre (juo pacto." The sum is this ; The manner was defined but very lately : there is no need at all to dispute it ; no advantai^es by it ; and therefore it were better it were left at liberty to every man to think as lie pleases , for so it was in the Church for above a thousand years together; and yet it were better, men would not at all trouble themselves concerning it ; for it is a thing impossible to be understood ; and therefore it is not fit to be incjuired after." Real Presence, vol. ix. p. 421—23. " The doctrine of the Church of England, and generally of the Protestants, in this article, is, — that after the Minister of the holy Mysteries hath rightly prayed, and blessed or conse- crated the IJread and W ine, the symbols become changed into the Body and Blood of Christ, after a sacramental, that is, in a spiritual real manner: so that all that worthily communicate, do by faith receive Christ really, effectually, to all the purposes of His I'assion: the wicked receive not Christ, but the bare symbols only ; but yet to their hurt, because the offer of Christ is rejected, and they pollute tiie Blood of the covenant, by using It as an unholy tiling. The result of which doctrine is this: It is bread, and it is Christ's Body. It is bread in substance, Christ in the Sacrament; and Christ is as really given to all that are truly disposed, as the symbols are; each as they can; Christ as Christ can be given; the IJread and Wineastliey can; and to the same real purposes, to w hich they are designed : and Christ does as really nourish and sanctify the soul, as the elements do the body." Ihid V2\. " This may suffice for the word ' real,' which the Knglish Papists much use, but, as it appears, with much less reason than tlie sons of the Church of England: and when the Heal Pre- sence is denied, tiie word ' real' is taken for ' natural,' and dm»s not signify ' transceiulenter,' or in his just and most proper sig- nification. But the word ' substiuitialiter* is also used by Pro- testants in this (jueslion, which I suppose maybe the same with tliat which is in the Article of Trent, " Sacramentaliter pr.rsens Salvator substanti;'i suA nobis adest." ' in substance, but after a S;i( ruiiHiitil iii.iniK 1 :" u hich words if they might be understood 70 Taylor. in the sense in which the Protestants use them, that is, really, truly, without fiction or the help of fancy, but * in rei veritate,' so, as Philo calls spiritual things uvuyKonlrccrxi ov-lxi, ' most necessary, useful, and material substances,' it might become an instrument of a united confession." .... Ibid. p. 427. " One tiling more I am to note in order to the same purposes ; that, in the explication of this question, it is much insisted upon, that it be inquired whether, when we say we believe Christ's Body to be ' really' in the Sacrament, we mean, " that Body, that Flesh, that was born of the Virgin Mary,"that was crucified, dead, and buried? I answer, I know none else that He had, or hath: there is but one Body of Christ natural and glorified; but he that says, that Body is glorified, which was crucified, says it is the same Body, but not after the same manner : and so it is in the Sacrament ; we eat and drink the Body and Blood of Christ, that was broken and poured forth ; for there is no other body, no other blood, of Christ; but though it is the same which we eat and drink, yet it is in another manner: and therefore, when any of the Protestant divines, or any of the fathers, deny that Body which was born of the Virgin Mary, that which was crucified, to be eaten in the Sacrament, — as Bertram, as St. JeromiC, as Clemens Alexandrinus, expressly affirm ; the meaning is easy ; — they intend that it is not eaten in a natural sense ; and then calling it ' corpus spirituale,' the word ' spiritual' is not a substantial predication, but is an affirmation of the manner, though, in disputation, it be made the predicate of a proposition, and the opposite member of a distinction. ' That Body which was crucified, is not that Body that is eaten in the Sacrament,' — if the intention of the propo- sition be to speak of the eating It in the same manner of being; but ' that Body which was crucified, the same Body we do eat,' — if the intention be to speak of the same thing in several manners of being and operating: and this I noted, that we may not be prejudiced by Avords, when the notion is certain and easy : and thus far is the sense of our doctrine in this article." Ibid. 430. " In this Feast all Christ, and Christ's Passion, and all His graces^ the blessings and effects of His sufferings, are conveyed." Holy Living, vol. iv. p 268. •* When the holy man stands at the Table of Blessing, and ministers the rite of Consecration, then do as the Angels do, '/(u/lor. 71 who behold and love and woixler that the Son of (ind should become Food to the souls of II is servants; tliat lie who cannot suffer any chaiiije or lessening should be broken into pieces and enter into the body to support and nourisji the spirit, and yet remain in heaven whilst He descends to thee upon earth; that He NNho hath essential felicity should become miserable and die for tliee, and then give Himself to tiiee, for ever to redeem thee from sin and misery." Ihid. p. iibjj. " Have mercy upon us, () heavenly Father, according to Thy glorious mercies and promises, send Thy Holy Ghost upon our hearts, and let Him also descend upon these gifts, that by His good, His holy, His glorious Presence, He may sanctify and enlighten our hearts, and He may bless and sanctify these gifts, That this Bread may become the Holy Hody of Christ. .'Vnien. And this Chalice may become the life-giving Blood of Christ. Amen." Oljh'c fttr Ike Uohj i'ownniuion, vol. xv. p. C'99. " In the act of receiving, exercise acts of taith witli much confidence and resignation, believing it not to be common bread and wine, but holy in their use, holy in their signification, holy in their change, and holy in their effect: and believe, if thou art a worthy communicant, thou dost as verily receive Clirist's Body and Blood to all effects and purposes of the Spirir,as thou dost receive the blei>sed elements into thy mouth, that thou puttest thy finger to His hand, and thy hand into His side, and thy lips to His fonlinel of blood, sucking life from His heart; and yet if thou doxt communicate unworthily, thou eatest and drinkest Christ to thy danger, antl death, and destruction. Dispute not concerning the secret of the mystery, and the nicety of the manner of ( hrist's Presence; it is sufficient to thee, that Christ shall be present to thy soul, as an instrument of grace, as a pledge of the resurrection, as the earnest of glory and immortality, and a moans of many intermedial bles.siiigs, even all such as are necessary for lliee, and are in order to thy salvation. And to make all this good to thee, there is nothing necessary on thy part but a holy life, and a true belief of all the sayingh of ("hrisi; amongst which, indefinitely assent to the words of institution and believe that ("hrifit. in the Holy Sacra- ment, gives tfiee I lis Bfxlv and Ilis Blood. He that believes 72 Taylor. Ken Hackelt. not this, is not a Christian. He that believes so much, needs not to inquire further, nor to entangle his fiiith by disbelieving his sense." Holy Living, vol. iv. p. 172. " And therefore the Christian ministry havino greater privi- leges, and being honoured with attrectation of the Body and Blood of Christ, and offices serving to a better covenant, may with greater argument be accounted excellent, honourable, and royal." Divine Institution of Office Ministerial, t. 5. §. 9. vol. xiv. 457. Bishop Ken. ** I believe, O crucified l.ord, that the Bread which we break in the celebration of the Holy Mysteries is the communication of Thy Body, and the Cup of blessing which we bless is the communication of Thy Blood, and that Thou dost as effectually and really convey Thy Body and Blood to our souls by the Bread and Wine, as Thou didst Thy Holy Spirit by Thy breath to Thy disciples, for which all love, all glory be to Thee. *' Lord, what need I labour in vain to search out the manner of Thy mysterious Presence in the Sacrament, when my love assures me Thou art there? All the faithful who approach Thee, with prepared hearts, they well know Thou art there, they feel the virtue of divine love going out of Thee to heal their infirmities and to inflame their affections; for which all love, all glory be to Thee. " O God Incarnate, how Thou canst give us Thy Flesh to eat and Thy Blood to drink; how Thy Flesh is meat indeed; how Thou who art in heaven, art present on the Altar, I can by no means explain; but I firmly believe it all, because Thou hast said it, and I firmly rely on Thy love and on Thy Om- nipotence to make good Thy word, though the manner of doing it I cannot comprehend." Exposition of the Church Cate- chism. Bishop Hackeit. " That which astonisheth the communicant and ravisheth his heart is, that this Feast afford no worse meat than the Body and Blood of our Saviour. These He gave lor the life of the world, these are the repast of this Supper, and these we truly partake. For there is not only the visible reception of the outward signs, but an invisible reception of the thing signified. Ilarkcll. IJcrcrn/;//'. 7S There is far more than a shadow, than a type, tiiaii a figure. Clirist did not propose a sign at that hour, but also lie gave us a Gii'l, ami that Gift really and effectually is Hiuiself, wiiich is all one as you would say, spiritually Himself; for spiritual union is the most true and real union that can be. That which is promised, and faith takes it, and hath it, is not fiction, fancy, opinion, falsity, but sid)stance and verity. Therefore it cannot choose but that a re;d union must follow between Ciirist and us, as there is a union of all parts of the body by the animation oC one soul. . . . Hut faith is the moutii Avherewith we eat His Body and drink His Blood, not the mouth of a man, but of a faithful man, for we hunger after Dim nut with a corporeal appetite but a spiritual, therefore our eat- ing must be spiritual, and not corporeal. Yet this is a real substantial partaking of Christ crucified, broken, His Flesh bleeding, His wounds gaping: so He is exhibited, so we are sure to receive Him, which doth not only touch our out- ward senses in the elements, but pass througli into the deptli of the soul. For in true divinity real and spiritual are aecpii- pollent: ... 'A mystery neither to be set out in words, nor to be comprehended sufficiently in the mind, but to be adored by faitli,' says Calvin." Chnsl'ian Consolalions, Up. Taylor's Works, ed. Heber, vol. i. p. 1()2. Jhshop Ucveridyc. " When we hear the words of Consecration repeated as they came from our Lord's own nioutli, " This is My Body which is given for you," and " 'iliis is My Blood which was shed for you and for many for the remission of sins;" we are then stedf istly to believe, that although the substance of the Bread and Wine still remain, yet now it is not common bread and wine, as to its use; but the Body and Blood of Christ in that Sacra- mental sense wherein He spake the words. . . . Wlu-n it comes to our turn to receive ii, then wo are to lay aside all thoughts of bread and wine, and the Minister and every tiling else that is or can bo seen, and fix our faith, as it is " the evidence of things not seen," wholly and solely upon our blessed Saviour, as otTering us His own Body and Blood to preserve our bodies and souls to everlasting life, which we are therefore to receive by faith, as it is " the substance of things hoped for," sledfastlv believing it to he, 7 4 Beveridge. as our Saviour said, '* His Body and Blood," which our Church teacheth us are verily and indeed taken and received by the faithful in the Lord's Supper." Necessity and Advantage of Frequent Communion, p. 204, 5. ed. 1721. *« Whereby He plainly signified, that what He now gave them to eat and drink, He would have them look upon it, and receive it, not as common bread and wine, but as His Body and Blood; the one as broken, the other as shed, for their sins." Catechism, p. 125. " Hence also it is, that our Church requires us to receive the Holy Sacrament kneeling, not out of any respect to the creatures of Bread and Wine, but to put us in mind that Al- mighty God our Creator and Redeemer, the only object of all religious worship, is there specially present, offering His own Body and Blood to us, that so we may act our faith in Him, and express our sense of His goodness to us, and our unwor- thiness of it, in the most humble posture that we can. And indeed, could the Church be sure that all her members would receive as they ought with faith, she need not to command them to receive it kneeling : for they could not do it any other way : for how can 1 pray in faith to Almighty God, to pre- serve both my body and soul to everlasting life, and not make my body, as well as soul, bow down before Him ? How can I by faith behold my Saviour coming to me, and offering me His own Body and Blood, and not fall down and worship Him.?* How can I by faith lay hold upon the pardon of my sins, as there sealed and delivered to me, and receive it any otherwise than upon my knees? I dare not, I cannot do it. And they who can, have too much cause to suspect, that they do not discern the Lord's Body, and therefore cannot receive it worthily. Be sure, our receiving the blessed Body and Blood of Christ, as the Catholic Church always did, in an humble and adoring posture, is both an argument and excite- ment of our faith in Him. By it we demonstrate, that we dis- cern the Lord's Body, and believe Him to be present with us in a particular sacramental sense, and by it we excite and stir up both ourselves and others to act our faith more stedfastly upon Him, in that by our adoring Him, we actually acknowledge Him to be God, as well as man; and therefore on whom we have all the reason in the world to believe and trust for our salvation." 0)i Frequrnt Connnt/iiio)/, p. 208. Hull. Hickcs. 7ft lip. nail. " We are not i<;norant, that the ancient Fathers generally teach, that the Hiead and Wine in the luicharist, by or upon the consecration of thcni, do beconie, and are made the Body and Blood of Christ. I'ut we know also, that though they do not all explain themselves in the same way, yet they do all de- clare their sense to be very dissonant from the doctrine of tran- 8ubstantiation . Some of the most ancient doctors of the C hurch, as Justin Martyr and Irenseus, seem to have had this notion, that by or uj)on the sacerdotal Benediction, the Spirit of Clirist or a divine virtue from ( hrist descends upon the elements, and accompanies them to all worthy communicants, and that there- fore tiiey are said to be and are the Body and Blood of Christ; the same Divinity whicli is hypostatically united to the jjody of Christ in Heaven, being virtually united to the elements of liread and Wine on earth. Which also seemsto be the meaning of all the ancient Liturgies, in which it is prayed that (iod would send down his Spirit upon the Bread and Wine in the Eucharist." Answer to Uos.sucf. ///r/rs'.v Coiitmrrrsia/ Dis- courses, vol. i. p. 249 Flirkr.s. " Nay I maintain, that no other interpretation of these words (St. Luke xxii. 18. the words of institution) can be invented, which shall either be more probable than this of ours, or more suitable to the purpose of our Saviour. .And indeed that this is the true and only meaning of the text, I conclude from hence, that the Primitive Church always taught and understood it in this sense. And this I will now make good by a cloud of most unquestionable witnesses. " And first let us hear St. Ircna?us. St. Polycarps contem- porary, a most egregious assertor of Apostolic Tradition. In his fourth Book, being to prove against the Marcionites that Jesus Christ was the Son of the One true (Jod, who made the world, and instituted the law of .Moses for the Jews, he draws his argument from the oblation of the Kucharist; and our opinio i. says he, " is agreeable to the Eucharist, and the Eucharist does reciprocally confirm our opinion : for we offer unto the L<»rd those things which arc His, congruously declaring the conniiu- 78 Hickes. Couiber. nication and the unity both of the Flesh and Spirit." And then follow these words : " For as the Bread which is from the earth, partaking of the invocation of God, is no longer common bread, but the Eucharist, consisting of two things, an earthly and an heavenly : so also our bodies, partaking of the Eucharist, are no longer mere corruptible bodies, but have hope of a resurrection." In this passage the holy father does most expressly assert, that the Bread is made the Eucharist, that is, the Body of Jesus Christ by invocation of God, to wit by consecration, as will appear more fully in the sequel. In his fifth book the same holy father disputes against Valentinus; and maintains, that Jesus Christ assumed the human nature truly and really, and not only in appearance, as some heretics dreamt And to prove this also, he applies the Sacrament of the Eucharist. " And thus," says he, " to wit, according to these things, neither has the Lord redeemed us with His Blood; nor is the Cup of the Eucharist the communication of His Blood; nor the Bread which we break the communication of His Body :" and a little after he has these words; "when therefore both the Bread broken, and the Cup mixed, have partaken of the Word of God, they become the Eucharist of the Body and Blood of Christ." Christian Priesthood, App. p. cccclxxxii. Dean Comber. *' Only we must note, that this Amen in the end of this [^Con- secration] prayer was anciently spoken by the people with a loud voice; not only to shew their joining in the desire that the ele- ments may become truly consecrated, but also to declare their firm belief that they are now to be esteemed as the very Body and Blood of Christ; let us therefore here most devoutly seal all that the priest hath done, and unfeignedly testify our faith by a hearty Amen. ** Lord, it is done as Thou hast commanded, and I doubt not but the mystery is rightly accomplished; I am persuaded that here is that which my soul longeth after, a crucified Saviour communicating Himself to poor penitent sinners. O let me be reckoned among that number, and then I shall assuredly receive Thee, Holy Jesus. Amen." Companion to the Temple^ vol. i. fol. p. 543. " Still we do believe that every duly disposed commu- nicant doth receive really the Body and Blood of Christ, in (\nnhi y. 77 and by these elements, hut it is l)y i'ailh and not hy sense. If we receive them in tlie manner, and to the end which Chri-t appointed, they «^nve us a lively remembrance of His love and all-sullicient merit, and thereby invite our faith to embrace this crucified Redeemer, as the satisfaction for our sins; whereupon He (who is most ready to close with penitent sinners) doth by this rite of His own appointing, give Himself and the salutary benefits of His death unto such, and although the manner be mysterious, yet the advantages are real, and the effect more certain than if we eat or drank His natural flesh and blood." Ih. p. 540. An a( I of faith. " O Eternal Word of God, by whose power all things were made.. I will not ask how Thou canst give me Thy Flesh to eat; because I am abundantly satisfied in Thy saying, " This is My Body:" since Thou canst make it become to me whatsoever Thou sayest it is. I believe, Lord, help my unbelief! What though my senses assure me, the outward substance and its accidents still remain; yet my faith and my experience tell me there is an efficacy therein, beyond the power of any other thing. Alas! the Flesh would profit me nothing, John iv. fiS. for he that is joined to Thee must be one spirit, 1 Cor. vi. 17. O let these sacred Symbols therefore make me partaker of Thy nature, and a partner in Thy merits: let them unite me to Thee, ingraft me in Thee, and make That Body mine which did suffer death for me, and then I shall seek no further, but be more happy than if I could understand all mysteries: sure I am, This is Thy Body in Sacrament, it communicates to us the blessings and benefit thereof, and though presented in a figure, and by a holy rite, yet it is to all its purposes that which it doth represent; I will therefore receive it as Thy Body, and esteem it infinitely above all other food, that I may not be judged for not discerning Thy Body. () Kt it be unto me according to my faith. Amen." Ih. p. t)\1. " It will not suffice me, dearest Saviour, to receive Thee in part only, for I nuist be wholly Thine, and (blessed be Thy Name) Thou art willing to be wholly mine also. Thou ha.st already given me Thy Holy Body to cleanse my nature, and now Thou art preparing Thy precious B1o(k1 to wash away my'guilt. My sins have poured out every drop thereof, wherefore Thou 78 Comber. Wake. presenlest it to me itself, to shew how truly Thou didst suffer death for me. And now, O my Redeemer, Thou hast said, This Cup is the Communion of Thy blood, and Thy truth is unques- tionable. Thy power is infinite, and Thy love was such, that Thou gavest thy heart's-blood for me. I will receive it therefore as the blood of the Everlasting Covenant, the seal of all the pro- mises of Thy Holy Gospel " " The second happiness assured by this Holy Eucharist is, that we are thereby united to Jesus, so as to have fellowship with Him, 1 John i. 3. and in St. Paul's phrase we do thereby become members of His Body, of His Flesh, and of His Rone, Eph. v. SO. for He gives us Himself to be our food, with intent that He may be one with us, and we with Him. As some have made their leagues of friendship by drinking each other's blood, thereby intending to create a sympathy, and as it were to mingle souls: and since we have been fed with that Food, with which God feeds his dearest children, and have participated of that Spirit which quickens the great mystical body of Christ, 1 Cor. xii. 9. we may infer, that we are living members of the true Church also: let us therefore solace ourselves with reflecting upon the happiness of our present estate." ** The third benefit which worthy receivers have by this Sacrament, is, that it doth consign them to a blessed immortality and this follows from the former, it being impossible any true member of Christ should be left for ever in the graven since the Head liveth, the members shall live also, John vi. 64. hence the Fathers called it an antidote against death, and the means to make us partakers of our Lord's immortality. For Jesus doth not only here refresh our souls with a present communica- tion of His graces, but doth seal that covenant also, one con- dition of which is, that He will bring us to glory." lb. p. 566, 7. Archbishop Wake. " The Bread which we break is, not only in figure and simili- tude, but by a real spiritual Coininuaiou, His Body. The Cup of Blessing which wu bless is by the same Communion His Blood." JolmauH. 79 Johns *' Nor can I conceive liow the words of St. Paul can otherwise be understood, in their full scope and latitude, when he says, "TheC'up of blessing which we bless, is it not the Communion?" &c. 1 Cor. X. 16. He supposes that the Body and Blood of Christ are coinnmnicated to us by the Bread and Wine in the Holy Eucharist .... And wiien St. Paul saith that ignorant and profane communicants " do not discern the Lord's Body" in the Holy Eucharist, (1 Cor. xi. 29.) and that " they are guilty of" (an indignity toward) " the Body and lilood of our Lord," ver. 2?. he surely takes it for granted that the Body and Blood are actually there, whether they discern it or not .... *' I believe there is nothing that can more inflame and exalt the devotion of a sincere Christian, than to think and believe, that when he is praying at God's Altar and receiving the Holy Eucharist, he has the price of his redemption in his hand, or lying before his eyes," Propitiatory Oblation, p]), 28, 101. " The full and true notion of the Eucharist is, that it is a religious Feast upon Bread and Wine, that have been first offered in sacrifice to Almighty God, and are become the mysterious Body and Blood of Christ " Unbloody Sacrijice, vol. ii. p. 18. ** It was the universal belief of the ancients, that, by the spe- cial presence of the Holy Spirit, the Bread and Wine were made the Body and Blood of Christ, in life and power, as they were before in figure or representation. As the natural Body of Christ was formed in the wouib by the overshadowing of the Holy Ghost; so they expected, and prayed, that, by the ope- ration of the same Spirit, the Bread and Wine might be made the Body and Blood, in a more effectual manner than they were, when offered to God as mere representatives : and it was their certain belief that the Bread thus consecrated l)y the secret influence of the Spirit, was the very Body of Christ in power, and energy, and to all intents and purposes of religion, and so far as it was ])ossible for one thing to be made another, without change of substance. J his was indeed no Article of their Creed, because the Oeed was originally drawn not for communicants, but to be rehearsed by persons that were to be baptized, or their suretie-^. B\it it was an .Article to whicli all communicants gave their consent so oft as they received. For so Johnson. the Priest of old said, at the delivery of the Bread to every single communicant, " The Body of Christ:" and every commu- nicant ansM^ered, Amen; by which he was understood to give his consent to what the Priest said. And in the same manner they acknowledge the sacramental Wine to be the Blood of Christ. The primitive Church believed not any change of substance in the Sacrament. For they ever affirmed the Bread and Wine to remain after consecration ; but that by the over- shadowing of the Holy Ghost they were Christ's Body and Blood, not only by way of type, or figure, but in real power and effect. " And we are to observe that, in the institution, Christ says of the Bread, " This is My Body;" of the Cup, or Wine, " This is My Blood," without adding any -words to abate the signification of that expression. He calls the sacramental Bread My Flesh, five times in six verses in this chapter, from which I take my text, beginning at verse 51, ending at verse 56: nay, He calls it My Flesh, which I ivill give for the life of the rvorld, verse 51. And it appears under this pledge of Bread He did actually offer His Body to the Father for the redemption of mankind. See sect. 6. and so on to the 9th, discourse ii. And He calls the Cup, or Wine, His Blood, four times within the compass of four verses, beginning at the 53d, ending at the 56th. He knew full well what captious hearers He had, and that they were upon the point of deserting Him on this account ; yet He does not forbear to speak the mystery, as that mystery deserved. St. Paul tells them that unworthily received the Sacrament, that they were " guilty of the Body and Blood of the Lord ;" and the same Apostle says of the Cup, that it is '' the Communion of the Blood of Christ ;" and of the Bread, that it is " the Communion of the Body of Christ," without any mollifying addition. We are not therefore to wonder that the primitive Church made this an Article of faitli, though not of their Creed. " And the consecrated Bread and Wine being thus, by the secret operation of the Holy Spirit, made the Dody and Blood of Christ, did fully answer the characters which Christ gives us of His Flesh and Blood in this 6th chapter of St. John's Gospel." Primitive Communicant, p. 141 — 144. *' And I am firmly persuaded that this is the sum of what Christ teacheth us in this chapter : and I cannot doubt of it when I consider, that this was the belief of all Christians in tlie first and purest ages. JdliHsnn. Slttup. Leslie. ft] *' To believe this doctrine, is iinlccd a " work," or" labour," so our Saviour justly calls it. A ^reat part ol" those who first heard it, coidd not be persuaded that it was possible for II im, in any ^rood sense, to ^rjve His Flesh to be eat, II is Blood to be drank ; or that, if He could, the benefit of eatin^r and drink- ing them, could be so great as He hrd promised; therefore thtij trtiil utrai/, and walktil no morv iriili Him, ver. 66. Christ foreknew what corrupt glosses men of latter ages would put upon His woids, and Jiow diflicult it would be for private Christians to break through prejudices, and mistakes, made current by the countenance and traditions of great men. .And perhaps there is no one ])oint in our religion that recjuires more labour, and study, to be rightly informed in, at this day, than this of which i am now speaking ; 1 mean, the true discerning of our Lord's Body in the Holy Sacrament, and the benefits promised to them who receive it, in this sixth chapter of St. John's Gospel. I hid. p. 17^i. ArcJihisJinjt Sharp. " But what then ? Do we not in the Sacrament truly partake of the Body and Blood of Christ? God forbid that anv one should deny it. There is none that understands any thing of the Sacrament but must acknowledge, that therein to all worthy receivers the Body and Blood of Christ is both given and like- wise received by them. This is the sense of the Church of England, when she doth so often declare that she owns the Pvcal Presence of Christ's Body and Blood to all tliat worthilv receive the Sacrament. '* We do indeed own that Christ is really present in the Sacrament to all worthy receivers, and in our Communion Ser- vice we pray to God to grant that we may eat the Flesh of Mis dear Son and drink His Blood, t / lire by the Fathtr, >(> he that eatcth Me, shall lire hy Me ; I will quicken or give him life by My Spirit, that Spirit by wliich My Body lives, and whose (juickening or life-giving virtue I will impart to that material thing wliich I shall make my Body and Blood, when I give this natural Body and Blood of Mine for the life of the world, or the redemption of mankind. It is not Chiist's doctrine that quickens and gives us life, but His Spirit, that Spirit which gave life to His own Body, and whicli together with His Body and Blood, or something which He dignifies with that name, which He has appointed to give us life. The Body and Blood then, or Flesh and lllocd, which in this chapter He promised to give (saying, My Jlesh which J will yire) for our food w hich shouUl nourish us unto eternal life, can be no other than that Bread and Wine which He gave when He instituted the Holy Eucharist or Lord's Supper, at which time lie dignified them with the name and virtue of H is Body and lilood. And so the holy and most ancient Fathers (who lived nearest to the Apostles' days, and therefore best understood the Apostles' lan- guage and doctrine, consecjuently could be^t expound them) have interpreted this })assagc, as apj)ears from St. Ignatius particularly, w ho being the disciple of St. John who wrote the Gospel where alone this discourse of our Saviour is recorded, is to be preferred toall other expositors ; and he tells us, as I have before observed, tiiat the Holy I^ucharist is the medicine of immortality, our an- tidote that we should not die, but live for ever in Christ Jesus." Scripture Acrottiil of thf Holy Kurharist, p. 113. " Now by comparing these words (the words of institution) of our Saviour wliicli He spake when he communicated this Bread and Wine to His di.>)ciples, and called those clcn.cnts His Body and Blood, with those He before spake in the sixth chapter of St. John, wliich I have already proved were spoken with re- lation to the ilolv F.ucharist; for in th.Tt chaptrr. ver. .01. The o 2 84 Brett. Whealley. Bread that I will give is My Flesh, which I will give for the life of the world ; we may thus paraphrase them ; " you may re- member that some time ago when I taught in Capernaum, and the Jews there told me of their fathers eating manna in the desert, which they called Bread from heaven, upon which I promised them, that if they would believe in Me, I would give them true Bread from Heaven, which should nourish them unto eternal life; and that this Bread was My own Flesh and Blood; they thought this a hard saying, thinking that I intended they should eat that natural Flesh they then saw, and that natural Blood then and still in My veins. I did not then think it pro- per to explain Myself any farther to them than to tell them, that what I had said was to be understood in a spiritual sense. That it is the Spirit that quickeneth ; the ivords that I speak unto you, they are Spirit and they are Life. But now T will make good that promise to you ; here is Bread and Wine, which I have now offered to God, and have blessed them with My Spirit, and thereby made them My Body and Blood in power and virtue: these I now give to you, eat the one and drink the other, and you shall receive all the benefits and blessings you then heard Me promise to those who should eat My Flesh and drink My Blood, / will raise you up at the last day, and you shall dwell in Me and I in you." And that the Church of England (to whose Book of Common Prayer this author gave his assent and con- sent when he was first admitted to a cure of souls in London) believes the sixth chapter of St. John to relate to the Holy Eucharist, is plain, for it is upon the authority of that chapter only that she can say in her Exhortation to her communicants, that " If with a true penitent heart and lively faith we receive that Holy Sacrament, then we spiritually eat the Flesh of Christ and drink His Blood, then we dwell in Christ and Christ in us, we are one with Christ and Christ with us:" for there is no other place of Scripture but the sixth chapter of St. John's Gospel where this doctrine is to be learnt." Ibid. p. 137. Wheatley. " In these words [of the Consecration Prayer, " Hear us, O merciful Father," &c.] the sense of the former is still implied, and consequently by these the elements are now consecrated, and so become the Body and Blood of our Saviour Christ." c. vi. s. xxii. p. aOl.Oxf. ed. 1819. " A Real Presertct of the Boily and blood of Cluist in tlie Eucharist, is what our Church frequently asserts in tins very office of Communion, in iier Ariicles, in lier Homilies, anil her Catechism: particularly in liie two latter, in the first of whicii she tells us, I'/tus much we must be sure to hohl, that in the Supper of the Lord there is no vain ceremony, no bare snjn, no untrue Jiyure of' a thing absent; — but the Communion of the Body and Blood of the Lord in a marvellous incorporation, which by the operation of the Holy Ghost— is through Faith wrought m the souls of the faithful, ^c. who therefore (as she farther instructs us in the Catechism) verily and indf:ed take and receive the Body and Blood of Christ in the Lord's Supper. This is the doctrine of our Church in relation to the Real Presence in the Sacrament, entirely different from the doctrine of Transubstantiation, which she hero, as well as elsewhere, disclaims." lb. s. xxxi. p. 330. Bishop \Mhon. " We otVer unto 'ihce, our King and our Goil, this Bread and this Cup. " We jrive Thee thanks for these and for all Thy mercies, beseeching Thee to send down Thy Holy Spirit upon this sacrifice, that lie may make this Bread the Body of Thy Christ, and this Cup the Blood of Thy Christ: and that all we, who are partakers thereof, may thereby obtain reniisi^ion of our sins, and all other benefits of His Passion. *• And, together with us, remember, O God. for good, the whole mvstical Body of Thy Son: that such as are yet alive may finish their course with joy; and that we, with all such as are dead in the I^ord, may rest in hope and rise in glory, for Thy Son's sake, whose death wo now commemorate. Amen. *' May I always receive the Holy Sacrament in the same meaning intention, and blessed effect, n ith which Jesus Christ administered it to His Apostles in His last Supjier." Sacra I'rirnfa, p. 9M, 94. " If therefore he a>k how often he should receive this Sacrament, he ou^ht to have an answer in the words of an ancient writer: ' Receive it as often .is you can, that the old ' serpent, seeing the blood of the true Paschal Land) upon your * lips, nuiy tremble toappioacii you.'" ('(nm /iiolia,Qi\. 18K).p.6:i- 86* Grahe. Bp. of Exeter. Grahe. " The English Divines teach, that in the Holy Eucharist the Body and Blood of Christ, under the species, that is, the signs, of Bread and Wine, are offered to God,, and become a represent- ation of the Sacrifice of Christ once made upon the Cross, whereby God may be rendered propitious." Daniel Brevint, ^c. Jeremy Taylor, MS. Adversaria, printed Tract 81. p. 368. Bishop of Exeter. ** When any of us speak of this great mystery in terms best suited to its spiritual nature; when, for instance, we speak of the real Presence of Christ's Body and Blood in the Holy Eucharist, there is raised a cry, as if we were symbolizing with the Church of Rome, and as if this Presence, because it is real, can be nothing else than the gross, carnal, corporeal, presence indicated in Transubstantiation. Now here, as with respect to Baptism, I will not argue the point, but will merely refer to the language of our Church in those authorized declarations of its doctrine to which we have assented, and in those formularies which we have both expressly approved and solemnly engaged to use. " It is very true, that none of these declarations or formularies use the phrase * real Presence;' and therefore, if any should attempt to impose the use of that phrase as necessary, he would be justly open to censure for requiring what the Church does not require. But, on the other hand, if we adopt the phrase, as not only aptly expressing the doctrine of the Church, but also as commended to our use by the practice of the soundest Divines of the Church of England, in an age more distinguished for depth, as well as soundness, of Theology than the present — such as Abp. Bramhall, Sharp, and Wake, (all of whom do not only express their own judgment, but also are witnesses of the general judgment of the Church in and before their days; ' No genuine son of the Church of England,' says Bramhall, ' did ever deny a true real Presence j') if, I say, we adopt the phrase, used by such men as these, and even by some of those,, who at the Reformation sealed with their blood their testimony to the Truth against the doctrine of Rome, (I allude especially to Bishops Ridley and Latimer — and even to Cranmer, who, when he avoided the phrase so abused by the Romanists, did yet employ equivalent lip. of K^vcler. R7 uorils,) it will bu surticieiit for the justilicalioii botli of tliem aiij of us to bliew, ihdt tlie language of the Church itself does in fact express the same thing though in diftereiit terniK. Still, I fully admit, that Christian discretion would bid us forbear from the use of the phrase, if the objection to it were founded on a sincere apprehension of giving oflence to tender consciences; and not, as there is too much reason to believe, on an aversion to the great trutli which it is employed to exprej^s." Charqt., p. 69—7 1 . The followin£r summary of the " Anglo-Catholic doctrine of tlie Eucharist" is added, not with any view of introducing the respected Author into the controversy, but as extracted from a work which since the publication of the first Edition has received the sanction of the most Reverend the Arclibishoj)s of Can- teibury and Armagh, to whom it is, with permission, inscribed. " This Catholic and Apostolic Church has always avoided any attempt to determine too minutely the mode of the true I^i esence in the Holy Eucharist. Guided by Scripture, she establishes only those truths which Scripture reveals, and leaves tiie subject in that my>tery, with which God for 11 is wise purposes has invested it. IJer doctrine concerning the true Presence appears to be limited to the following points: — '' Taking as her immoveable foundation the words of Jesus Christ: *' Tiiis is My l>ody Tliis is My Blood, of the new Covenant;" and '* \\ hoso eateth My Flesh and drinketh My Blood iiath eternal life;" she believes, that the Body or Flesh, and the Blood of Jesus Christ, tlie Creator and Redeemer of the ■world, both Cod and man, united in(livi>ibly in one Person, are verily and indeed given to, t. liiily, really, and sulislunliall y, ////. /-'ui/mw, p, :t'J. attu.illy, Johnson, p. 7y. I'resence leul uiul Mib^tuiitial, Jip. L'oiin, p. G-J. luybteriuus yet real, L' /\!^f). liit'tt, p. HJ. uf the Altar, .'Ibp. Laud, p. 57. Pock lint/toll, {(i/j. /V///j//r,) p. 7*. Ifp. A'tn, p. 58. Distaiicf of His Hodv in plui-e no objection to this, StUtuu, p. 51. lip. (V>.s/;/, p. {y\ lip.' Km, p. 72. /y/;. r.n/lnr, p. 71. liy tlu- word An>en, the CouMunnicajJt professes his belief in the prestnce of the Body and Blood of Christ in the Holy Kucharist, Ji/K Sj)tii/oi/', p. ()5. i'liiiUr, p. 7<»- (coiiip. ./oA//,sYy//, p. S<». Jij,. 'J'(H/lur, \\'r)ilhy Coiunjunicant, iv. 7- vol. xv. (i({).) Present to all that worthily receive, .ll>p. Sharp, p. 81 To the un- worthy also, Jackson, p b'2. Under the forms or species of bread and wine, Sutton, p. 57. (J rale ^ p. 8(). Unworthy receiving defiles the Body and Blood of Christ, Mvde, (from N. i'hri/s.) p. (il, 1?. Heal Presence confessed ;;enerully, lips. liidhjf, dfr. (8ee above head " Churches of I'^nijland," ike.) our Saviour comes and ofiers to us His own Bi)dy and lilood, lip. /irrrridp. lirainhall, p. Gli, 3. (quoted by Bp of Krtler, p. 8() ) true and real, taught by the Church of ]']ngland. Abp. Laud, p. 57- ff'hratlrtt, p. 85. That Presence caused by the Consecration, not by our Faith, lip. Cosin, p. ()4. Thorndikr, p. ()7« l^}*- Taijlor, p. (J^. ////. ///.//, p. 75. U'ukes, p. 7<). Not in receiving only, lip. (h'vrall, p. 42. IJerhcrl, p. 62. Our Lord's words consecrated for ever the elements of bread and wine, lloitkrr, p. .'<(). He Himself consecrates now, lij). Sparroir, p. (i5. (Jur Lord's words joined to the element make the Sacrament, lip. Aiidmce.s, p. 45. The elements changed supernaturally. Dr. Doniif, p. 50. Sacramcntally, but with such a change as no mortal man can nuike, but only that Omiiipotency of Christ's word, lip. fiidfrt/, p. tj5. Christ makes the ek-ments His Body and lUood, ///>. Sjtarrow, p. ()5. lirctt, p. H.i. the symbols changed Sacran)entally into the Btnly and Bhjod of Christ, I p. 'J\ii/lor, p. (51*. are Sacrauu-ntally His Body and Blood, Jackaoti, p. 61. Thorudikc, p. (>G. L'oinU'r, p. 77- in that Sacramental sense in which He spake the words, Bp. Ih'veridiff, p. 1\. become the Body and lilood of our Saviour Christ, lip Bull, 75. f/'heat'n/, p 85. without change of substance, Johnson, p. 7''« the mysterious Body and lilootl of Christ, Id. ih. The Bread in the Holy Sacrament is the Body of Christ, Leslie, p. 81. The Bread on which the thanks arc given is the Body of fMirist in the rcmembiance «if Him, Up. lixdliij, p. 35. 'I'he Body and Blood of Christ are made present by Cyonsecration, Al.p. liranihall, p . 7'^- The feast is (iod. Herbert, p. (j2. We receive all Christ, and His Passion, and His graces. lip. Taylor, p. 7'>- Christ crucitied, broken, His Flesh bleedinff, Bp. Ilarkett, p. 7.'^ The Holy Filucharist, the means of the resurrection of our bodies. Homilies, p. 'S^. lip. Overall, p, 42. lip. Andrewct, p. 48. Hooker, p. 11. note p. Comber, p. 78. lip. Taylor, \) 71. A' re//, p. S.I. THK END. MAXTKK, PRINTBK, OXFORO BOOK 8 PUBLISHED BY JOHN HENRY PARKER, OXFORD. A LIBRARY OF FATHERS OF THE HOLY CATHOLIC CHURCH, ANTtniOn TO THE DIVISION OF THE EAST AND WtST. TRANSLATED BY MEMBERS OF THE ENGLISH CHURCH. EDITED BY THE REV. E. B. PUSEY, D.D. REV. JOHN KEBLE. M.A. REV. JOHN H. NEWMAN, B.D. REV. C. MARRIOTT, M.A. VOLUMES PUBLISHED. I. THE CONFESSIONS OF S. AUGUSTINE. 2. THE CATECHETICAL LECTURES OF S. CYRIL OF JERUSALEM. 3. S. CYPRIAN'S TREATISES. 4&6. S. CHRYSOSTOM'S HOMILIES ON 1 CORINTHIANS. 6. S. CHRYSOSTOM on GALATIANS and EPHESIANS. 7. S. CHRYSOSTOM'S HOMILIES ON ROMANS. 8. S. ATHANASIUS' TREATISES against ARIANISM, Pt. I. 9. S. CHRYSOSTOM'S HOMILIES ON THE STATUES, OR TO THE PEOPLE OF ANTIOCH. 10. T E R T U L L I A N. VoL I. n. S. CHRYSOSTOM'S HOMILIES on St. MATTHEW, Pt. I. 12. S. CHRYSOSTOM'S HOMILIES on TIMOTHY, TITUS, AND PHILEMON. A COMMENTARY ON THE FOUR GOSPELS, COLLECTED OUT OF THE WORKS OF THE FATHERS; TRANSLATED FROM THE CATENA AUREA OF THOMAS AQUINAS, EDITED BY THE REV. E. B. PUSEY, D.D. J. KEBLE, M.A. J. H. NEWMAN, B.D. Vol. I. ST. MATTHEW. 3 Parts, £1 8s. Vol.11. ST. MARK. 10s Gd. Vol. III. ST. LUKE. Part I. 10.<. 6d. Vol. IV. ST. JOHN, in the press. 8vo. 10s 6d. THE ECCLESIASTICAL HISTORY OF M. L'ABBE FLEURV, From the Second Ecumenical Council to the end of the Fourth Century. TRANSLATED, WITH NOTES, By JOHN HENRY NP:VVMAN, B.I). Fellow of Oriel College. Vol. II. is in the press. The portion of Fleury's History which it is proposed to publish at present will comprise the period between the Second Ecumenical Council, held at Constantinople, A.D. 381. and the date of Pope Gregory the Great, about A.D. 600. It is calculated -to form six volumes. liiHihs puh/fs/u'il //// ./. //. Purh'/\ O.rfonL A LIHKARV OF ANGLO-CATHOLIC THKOLOCV. J*ubli^hi'd under tJie direction of the folUneimj Comniitttr. Rev. R. S. BAUTEU, D.C.L Warden of Winchester College. Rev. EDWARD CIICRTON, M.A. Cravko, Durham. Rkv. WILLIAM (illKSLKV, M A. Pr.'hl'ii.lary of Lichfield. Rev. W. F. IIOOK, D.D. \'icar ..f Leeds Rev. R. W. JFLF, D.D. Caiu.u of Christ Church. Rev. JOHN KFBLF, M.A. Professor of F..etry, Oxford. Rkv. W. IL MILL, D.D. Christian Advocate, Cambridge; Chaplain to the Lord Aichhishop of Canterbury. Rev. G. MOBFRLY, D.t .L. Head Master of Winchester School. Rev. J. H. NKW.MAN, B.I). Fellow cf Oriel College. Rev. H. H. NORRIS, M.A. Preben.lary of St. Paul's, Hackney. Rev. WILLIAM PALMER. M.A. \\orcester College, Oxford. Hon. & Rev. ARTHUR P. PERCEVAL, M.A. East Horsley, Guildford, Surrey. Rev. E. B. PUSEV, D.D Regius Professor of Hebrew, and Canon of Christ Church. SCPKRINTKNDINt; KDITOH. Rev. W. J. COPELAND, M.A. Fellow of Trinity College, Oxford. THE.\srKr;H .\Nn si:cri:t.\kv. CHARLES CRAWLEY, Esq. Fitzroy Farm, Highgaie. ITIILISIIKK. Mr. JOHN HENRY PARKER, Oxford. Volumes Published in 1841. BP. ANDREWES' SERMONS, Vols. L 11. UL & IV. 8vo. each 10s fid. ABP. BRAMHALL'S WORKS, Vol. L 8vo. 10s 6d. BP. BULLS HARMONY OF ST. PA FL AND ST. .LAMES ON JUSTIFICATION, 8vo. fis. 1842. BP. ANDREWES' SERMONS. Vol. V. Ms. ABP. BRAMHALL'S WORKS. Vol. IL 14s. Vol. HI. near hi rrndy. BP. NICOLSOX o\ i'HE CATECHls.M. (is. BP. be\erii)(;e-s works, v.l i. kis (;d. BP. BULL OX JrsTIFICATIOX, Parts II. and III. 12s. LS43. ABP. BRA.MHALLS WORKS, Vol. I\'. BI*. BE\ ERIIXJE'S \\()RKS, Vols. II. and III. BP. C:oSIX'S WORKS, Vol. I. BP. OVERALLS CONVOCATION HooK. THORN DIKE'S WORKS, Vol I. Subscribers pavinjj two guineas annually in adiuncc arc cnlitlcil lo all the publications without further piymi-nt. It is propove«l to publish six volumes (cf 100 pages on the averapr ) in each year. Persons wishin«^ to b«;con)c Subscribers are requested lo send their names, and those of thrir bookstllcrs, to the ."secretary, Cliarlcs (rawley, Fj»q., under cover, to the publisln r, Mr. Parker, bookseller, Oxford. Books published by J. H. Parker, Oxford. 8vo. 5s. AN ESSAY ON THE M I R A C L E S Recorded in the Ecclesiastical History of the early Ages, By JOHN HENRY NEWMAN, B.D. Fellow of Oriel College. Small 8vo. 2s 6d. THE DEVOTIONS OF BISHOP ANDREWES, SELECTED AND ARRANGED By the Rev. JOHN HENRY NEWMAN, B.D. Fellow of Oriel College. OXFORD EDITIONS. s. d. A K EM PIS' Imitation of Christ, in four bookf?. Small 8vo 5 BULL, [Bp.] Nelson's Life of, with a Preface by J. H. Newman, B.D. 18mo. 3 () Vindication of the Church of England 2 t) HAMMOND'S Parsenesis, edited by the Ven. H. E. Man- ning, M.A. Archdeacon of Chichester 2 (j HENS HAW'S Devotions, 18mo. 2 JONES (of Nayland), Letters from a Tutor to his Pupils, edited by the Rev. E. Coleridge, M.A. Eton College 2 6 KEBLE'S Selections from HOOKER 3 6 LAUD'S [Abp.] Devotions, edited by F. VV. Faber, M.A. 3 (S Autobiography 5 On the Liturgy 3 6 PATRICK [Bp.] on Prayer, edited by F. E. Paget, M A. 3 6 - — on Repentance and Fasting 2 6 Advice to a Friend 2 6 PRIDEAUX'S Doctrine of Prayer, edit, by S.W.Cornish, I). D. 4 SARAVTA on the Priesthood ' 2 6 SCANDRET on Sacrifice ^ 2 6 SHERLOCK'S Practical Christian, Vol. I. 2 6 Vol. II. in the press, SPARROW'S [Bp.] Rationale on the Book of Common Prayer, edited by the Rev. G. C. Berkeley, M.A. 5 SPELMAN (Sir H.) Churches not to be violated, edited by the Rev. R. W. Spranger, M.A. 2 6 SPINCKKS' Devotions, edited by the Rev. F.E. Paget, M.A. 3 6 SUTTON'S Disce Mori, Learnc to Die 3 6 Disce Vivere, Learne to Live 3 6 Meditations on the Eucharist, netv edition in the press TAYLOR'S [Bp.] Ciolden Grove, and the Guide for the Penitent, with a Preface by E. B. Pusey, D.D. 2 6 VINCENTI US LIRTNENstS against Heresy 2 6 WELLS'S Rich Man's Duty: and Dowsing's Journal; with a Preface by J. H. Newman, B.D. 2 6 WILSON'S [Bp.] Sacra Privata (entire) 3 G Parochialia 2 6 18mo. c/of/«, gilt edges, 2s. OFFICIUM EUCHARISTICUM, A Preparatory Service to a Devout and Worthy Reception OF THE LORD'S SUPPER.' P.y EDWARD LAKE, D.D. The thiriii-first edition. PRESBYTERIAN H'STOmCAL SCKl'ETY 620 WITHBRSPOON BUILDING _. . Ar-»c-l DMIA 7. PA.