1 / CL .!5 /? 3 « -a .J.^ ;^ 1 ^ Hi Q. 1 ^w *S) ^ o ^ ^ 5 o |Zi CD C w O bfl Cs •25 E-i <: :| fc^ O ^ sT S E .to o M CJ *kJ ^ Ph CO 1- Ph Si. ^ TJ ^* % c C ^ r 1 V^ CL S ^ Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from Princeton Theological Seminary Library http://www.archive.org/details/outwardbaptismnoOOsher OUTWARD BAPTISM NOT A CONDITION OE THE CHRISTIAN COVENANT, PAUL ALTOGETHER SUPREME OVER THE GENTILE CHURCHES, REV. H. M. /SHERWOOD, RECTOR OF BROUGHTON HACKET, AND VICAR OF WHITE LADIES' ASTON, WORCESTERSHIRE. LONDON : T. HATCHAED, 187 PICCADILLY. I M.DCCC.L^^T. LONDON: Printed by G. Bakclav, Castle St. Leicester Sq. ^ ?' CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. PAGE introductoey. — the careful study of holy scelptuee, howe\t:e dlfficult of comprehension, to be pee- fekred to the \\tiitings of uninspired men, how- ever easy they are to be understood ... 1 CHAPTER 11. THE GOODNESS OF GOD MANIFESTED IN THE CREATION OF ANIMATED THINGS, AND IN HIS DEALINGS WITH THEM 11 CHAPTER III. THE SACEAMENT OF BAPTISM ; -R-HETHER OR NO IT BE A CONDITION OF THE CHRISTIAN COVENANT . . . 33 CHAPTER lY ST. Paul's position in the church 54 CHAPTER Y. ST. Peter's epistles, and the first nine of st. pauls, TO WHOM addressed 70 IV CONTENTS. PAGE CHAPTEE VI. ST, Paul's doctrinal writings voluminous ; he monopo- lises ALL attention AFTER HE IS INTRODUCED ON THE SCENE 81 CHAPTER YII. THE SACRAMENT OF THE LORd's SUPPER COMPARED WITH THE PASSOVER 86 CHAPTER VIII. THE REFUSAL OF THE CUP TO THE LAITY, AND AN INQUIRY AS TO THE TIME WHEN THE APOSTLES RECER'ED THEIR ORDINATION 108 CHAPTER IX. CONCLUSION 110 CHAPTER I Introductory. — the careful study of holy scripture^ however difficult of compre- hension, to be preferred to the writings of uninspired men, however easy they are to be understood. *' Holy Scripture containeth all things necessary to salva- tion; so that whatsoever is not read therein, nor may be proved thereby, is not to be required of any man that it should be believed as an article of the Faith, or be thought requisite or necessary to salvation." — Article VI. Faith is continually brought before our notice in Holy Scripture, and pressed upon our atten- tion as being a thing absolutely necessary to our salvation; and it is called by, St. John, '''The victory that overcometh the world.-'^ To endeavour, therefore, to promote and en- courage the growth of this feeling in the hearts of men by proclaiming to them the truth, is acknowledged to be the great duty of the re- ligious teacher, who ought to enforce on his hearers the necessity of believing implicitly, and without questioning, those things \yhich are dis- tinctly taught them in Holy Scripture, but which 2 HOLY SCRIPTURE TO BE PREFERRED cannot be clearly understood ; such, for instance, as the doctrine of the Holy Trinity, and at the same time to explain those things which can be made clear ; for by so doing he will undoubtedly bring more visibly before them the providential and parental love of God our heavenly Father. But if it be right that the teacher should ex- plain those things which can be understood, it is likewise evident that a careful inquiry into spiri- tual things rightly undertaken, so as to endeavour to learn what can and what cannot be made clear to us, must be profitable, provided that we enter into it with a fall determination not to permit any seeming difficulties or apparent inconsistencies to cause doubts of God to arise in our minds. It is to this end that the Scriptures are given us, that by a careful study of the dealings of the Almighty with his creatures, we may be enabled to see clearly the wisdom which he has shown in all his works, the faithfulness, the justice, and the loving-kindness of his nature, which manifest themselves from the beginning to the end of the wonderful history of his government of the uni- verse. There are of necessity many things in the Holy Scriptures which we, in humble dependence on God, must take on trust ; and happy, indeed, is that man who possesses a mind capable of fully doing this ; for it is not the most learned or the most reasoning inquirer into religious truth that TO UNINSPIRED WRITINGS. 3 is always chiefly to be envied^ but the most humble and reliant, faith being more valuable than know- ledge to the possessor of it ; and there is no sight more beautiful in this world than the humble and sincere piety and the firm trust in God shown by many of the meek and lowly in heart amongst men, the unlearned and illiterate ; but there are many to whom God has given the talent of strong reasoning powers, which have been in many cases also fostered by education and other circumstances, and who cannot enter into any matter, whether of a secular or religious character, without using those powers wisely or unwdsely, and who are incapable of receiving the truths of the Holy Word of God with that implicit and unquestioning faith and ready acquiescence which others show, and who are by nature dissatisfied if they cannot imderstand the reasons and causes of things ; and though, perhaps, they may accept with submission everything which bears evidence of having cooie by divine authority ; yet they do this, not as it were naturally, but oftentimes by force, and by the strong conviction that they must and ought to do it. It is undoubtedly the duty of such persons to follow up the study of the deep things of God, because the talent given them was not intended to be buried, but to be used for the good of them- selves and their fellow-creatures ; yet they may, and probably often do, envy the humble and 4 HOLY SCRIPTURE TO BE PREFERRED unreasoning faith of those of a different tempera- ment to themselves. Powers of reasoning and a mind given to in- quiry, are most excellent things; but, unfor- tunately, the weakness of man^s nature and his prejudices are very likely to pervert his judgment, turning it this way and that, so that he is always in danger of being led away from the truth, or at least of looking on it with doubt and uncertainty, according as his reasoning powers present it to him in different aspects ; and the only real safe- guard in these cases, viz. humility, and a faithful dependence on the guidance of the Holy Spirit, is to all appearance more difficult of attainment to such a person than to the unreasoning Christian. To guard against the danger of being carried away beyond his depth, which must be attendant on the pursuit and investigation of the deeper and more hidden doctrines of religion, it is neces- sary that the student should distrust his own judgment and receive all new ideas, especially if very different or opposed to former ones, with the greatest caution, not suffering himself to be led away by imagination, nor trusting to the writings of others like himself, or to their interpretations of Scripture, but rather studying the exact words, and considering what are the fair inferences to be drawn from the arguments, of Holy Writ; for there is little doubt that they who make a prac- tice of studying and reasoning on God's word, TO UNINSPIRED WRITINGS. 5 and trying to draw the inferences which fairly result from the statements therein made, without relying too much on other books and on the opinions of other men, gain thereby a greater vigour of understanding, and become quicker in receiving the mysteries of that sacred volume, than they otherwise could. It is a remarkable fact that the great error which we justly attribute to the Romish Church of taking the Scriptures out of the hands of the people as much as possible, is one which we our- selves too often commit. The Romish priesthood, taking that Holy Book out of the hands of its disciples, under the plea that they cannot under- stand it, teaches them to listen only to the voice of the Church, and to the voluminous opinions of the Fathers; while we ourselves fill the world with tracts and other religious publications, many of them containing little else than pious exhorta- tions, to read which would so occupy the time, that they into whose hands they are placed have no leisure, and too often no inclination, to study at the fountain-head the words which flow from the mouths of God^s inspired teachers. It seems as though a habit of reading too ex- clusively uninspired religious publications, and relying too much on them for instruction and directions, fosters an idle habit of receiving ideas worked out by others in preference to working them out for ourselves, causing us to depend on b HOLY SCRIPTURE TO BE PREFERRED the opinions of other people, instead of dehber- ately reasoning on important matters ourselves; by which we perpetuate false doctrines, and pro- duce, if I may so speak, schools or parties in the religious community, individuals taking up, almost without knowing how, the views of the party to which they are favourably inclined, and never even troubling themselves to consider fairly how far those views will bear the test of reason, — they are like Saul, who, being exceedingly zealous of the traditions of the fathers, was led to oppose God when he thought he was doing his service. It is said of an old clergyman in the United States, that he advised a young aspirant for popu- larity to the following effect : — " If you aim at popularity, avoid in your sermons all subjects that require much thought or consideration ; leave nothing for your hearers to study or ponder over ; tell them what conclusions they are to come to, and what morals they are to draw from anything you may say, so that they need not have the trouble of thinking for themselves : they will much prefer your thinking for them. There was a great deal of truth in this ; and that it is true, is shown by the fondness of many people for bio- graphies of pious persons, who have spent their whole lives almost without a single event worth recording, and for books full of exhortations and stereotyped sentences, but containing few ideas, and those of the simplest description ; it is also TO UNINSPIRED WRITINGS. 7 shown by the avidity with which reviews are read, whereby people are enabled to avoid the trouble of forming an opinion for themselves on the merit of any publication or on the arguments it con- tains ; they can with far greater ease accept the opinions of the reviewer, and too often willingly shut their eyes to the fact that reviewing is nothing but a trade, and a very dishonest one into the bargain. Many persons can listen with pleasure to very long sermons day after day from the mouth of the same preacher; while to others such a con- tinued attention, even to a variety of preachers, would be extremely tedious. This difference may undoubtedly arise from many causes ; but I have no hesitation in asserting that it is often produced by the fact, that one person is content to receive ideas exactly as they are set before him, provided they are made very clear, and has no objection to hear them repeated over and over again in slightly different forms; while another will not and cannot place himself so entirely under the guidance of the teacher, but desires to retire into himself and ponder over and digest the things he has heard, which thus sink so much more deeply into his mind, and become so much more firmly estab- lished there that he does not like to hear them repeated too often afterwards in the same or other forms. Such a man is annoyed rather than pleased by too minute and prolonged an explan- 8 HOLY SCRIPTURE TO BE PREFERRED ation of any new idea whicli the preacher^s words may have introduced into his mind. This latter class of persons may be compared to those who, being no longer babes, prefer food of a more substantial character than that which babes require, — food which has not been so minutely divided, or made so easy of digestion as was necessary for them in their more childish days. St. Paul used this comparison in his first Epistle to the Corinthians and in his Epistle to the Hebrews, in both of which he rebuked his hearers because they did not apply sufficient thought and consideration to his instructions ; '' He was compelled/^ he said, " to feed them with milk, the food of babes, prepared, and as it were digested, for them by the parent, whereas they ought, after so long a time had passed away since they had first become babes in Christ, to be able to eat strong meat and digest it for themselves ; ^^ that is to say, they ought to have habituated them- selves to pondering over those more difficult matters which he desired to place before them, and by that means have been able to understand them, and so make a more rapid progress and advancement in religious knowledge. We cannot expect our powers of thought and judgment to come to their proper strength if we will not exercise them, any more than we can expect a child to attain the power of walking if never taught to use its limbs. TO UNINSPIRED WRITINGS. 9 They who receive the Holy Scripture as the inspired word of God, who reason on it with calm deliberation while yet they distrust their own judgment and acknowledge their deficiencies, will not presumptuously condemn those who differ from themselves in opinion, neither will they blindly attach themselves to a party as the Cor- inthians did, whom St. Paul rebuked for this fault as well as for their neglect of the exercise of their mental faculties. These three failings seem to be much con- nected together, for it appears as though there was a tendency in the one to produce the other, — the unthinking person is very apt to imagine that every argument which militates against him and his party is unworthy of consideration, and the partisan goes with those of his own persuasion, apparently without any suspicion that he is con- demning his opponents on the verdict, not of his judgment, but of his prejudices. But the matters which occupy the minds of thinking persons in this world are innumerable, and it is impossible for any one man to follow out a tithe of those ideas which may from time to time present themselves; it therefore becomes necessary for some to study one subject and others another, and right that each should en- deavour to communicate to the rest those thoughts which seem worthy of being preserved. As life, however, is shortj and thought exceedingly rapid, 10 HOLY SCRIPTURE TO BE PREFERRED, ETC. it seems as though the fewer are the words we use to express our ideas, provided we make our meaning clear, the better it will be for all parties. The thoughtful, intellectual man will take up an idea very quickly, and he will soon turn it over in his mind, and reason upon it, and form his judgment for or against it ; some subjects, indeed, necessarily require a long time, and many words, comparatively speaking, to explain them in ; but the aim of all writers and speakers should be to shorten, as much as possible, their explanations, lest by many words the thoughts they wish to impart should be overlaid and lost sight of; and the aim of all readers and hearers should be to form their own unbiassed opinions on the argu- ments of the writer himself. It shall, then, be my aim in the following pages to say all I have to say in few words ; and I sincerely hope that they who favour me with a perusal will trust to no opinions but their own in judging of what they here meet with. 11 CHAPTER II. THE GOODNESS OF GOD MANIFESTED IN THE CREA- TION OF ANIMATED THINGS_, AND IN HIS DEAL- INGS WITH THEM. " I speak as unto wise men : judge ye what I say." 1 Cor. X. 15. Among the many questions which have arisen in my mind when reading the Holy Scriptures^ and on which I have desired information^ is one, an inquiry into which may possibly seem to some unprofitable, yet to me it appears most profitable, as tending to lead to a greater and more con- firmed faith in the wisdom and fatherly goodness of the Almighty. The question to which I refer is this, — What was the motive by which God was led to create this world, and all the living things which it contains ; and not this world and its in- habitants only, but the angels also, the inhabitants of heaven and hell, the ministers of his will, those beings of whom at present we know so very little, and should know nothing if it were not for some occasional glimpses afi'orded us in the Bible ; 12 THE GOODNESS OF GOD MANIFESTED IN and, especially_, what was the motive with which he contrived the glorious plan of our salvation ; and the reason why all those things which he has ordered relating to the punishment of sinners should be necessary. We, as believing Christians, must assuredly feel confident that this matter, if rightly con- sidered, will, without doubt, tend to the manifest- ation of God^s honour and glory, for he hath done all things well, and in this, as in all his works, there can exist no im. perfections, no weak- ness, no faults; if, therefore, we cannot discern the perfectness of the whole, the cause must be our own blindness and ignorance. We need not be afraid to investigate this matter, provided we guide ourselves strictly by calm reasoning on the teaching of Holy Scripture, and permit not ima- gination to gain the mastery over us, for un- doubtedly the more we know of God^s doings, the more glorious will they appear, and the more will our faith in him be confiruied. His goodness is shown forth in a remarkable degree in the creation of living beings, angels, men, and the inferior animals, his motive for doing so being the gratification of one of the most remarkable of his attributes, viz., love. St. John saith, " God is love j '' thai is to say, his nature (if such a term can be applied) is such that objects of love seem necessary to him. This is difficult, and, probably, impossible for us THE CREATIOX OF ANIMATED THINGS. 13 to understand ; but it is sufficient for our purpose to know that he desires some objects on which his affections can rest, that he takes delight in seeing happiness around him, which feeling could not be gratified unless there were in existence living sensible beings on whom to bestow his bounties and his care. This, then, seems to have been his purpose in the creation of the inhabitants of heaven and earth; but that which I would more particularly inquire into is, the reason why they have been made with those dispositions, and subject to those laws, •which God, in his infinite wisdom, has thought fit to establish, — dispositions on their part, and laws on his, which seem, at first sight, to militate against the divine purpose of surrounding himself with happy creatures. It is plain that, in order to produce and main- tain true happiness amongst created beings, it is necessary to keep up a proper order and control over them ; because discord and confusion, if per- mitted to exist, would necessarily destroy all com- fort amongst them. Besides this^ it is certain, from the very nature of God, that obedience to his will is a necessary thing, for it is one of his attributes that he is supreme, and that none may or can resist his will, or take away from his dignity and majesty ; it is contrary to his nature to per- mit resistance, or to submit to insult, and, in fact, it would be a sacrifice of his divinity. This is not 14 THE GOODNESS OF GOD MANIFESTED IN the effect of a mere arbitrary determination on his part, but of the very necessity of his nature, without which he would cease to be God. Yet the salutary check of a fear of punishment must, in a great measure, if not entirely, be kept out of sight, if true happiness is to be attained, for the dread of punishment placed constantly before our eyes, would tend to produce unhappiness, because, as St. John saith, " Fear hath torment.''' Obedience, therefore, must be ensured from all things at any cost, however great, even to the de- struction of those who should rebel, for the two- fold reason that, in the first place, rebellion against the divine will cannot be tolerated for an instant; and, in the second place, that without obedience, there cannot possibly be that harmony, order, and perfect arrangement, which are necessary for the purpose of producing complete happiness and security to all created things. Rebellion and disobedience in thought, w^ord, or deed, constitute that which we call sin, for there is evidently no such thing as sin, except there be first a commandment to be obeyed or broken. This is shown by St. Paul's argument in the seventh chapter of his Epistle to the Romans, wherein he saith, " I had not known sin but by the law : for I had not known lust, except the law had said. Thou shalt not covet. But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without THE CREATION OF ANIMATED THINGS. J 5 the law sin was dead. For I was alive without the law once : but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died. And the commandment which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death. For sin taking occasion by the command- ment, deceived me, and by it slew me.'^ And by the words of the same apostle in the fourth chap- ter, the fifteenth verse : " Where no law is, there is no transgression;''^ and in the fifth chapter, the thirteenth verse, " Until the law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law." St. John also teaches the same thing : '^ Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law, for sin is the transgression of the law." The same thing also is shown by the circumstance, that in certain cases those things have been per- mitted, sanctioned, and even commanded, which at other times would have been decidedly con- demned. Thus, the sons of Adam must have married their own sisters, although, in all other cases, the strongest condemnation, and the most stringent laws, have been made against such an act. Joshua also slew the inhabitants of the land of Canaan, not the men only, but the women also, and the children ; although it is plain that what- ever sins the parents may have committed against God, the children must have been innocent. But, as I before observed, the purpose of the Almighty in creating the inhabitants of the heavens and the earth, seems to have been the 16 THE GOODNESS OP GOD MANIFESTED IN securing a multitude of objects of his loving- kindness^ of creatures on whom he could bestow happiness and blessings unlimited. How, then, was it possible to create living, sensible beings, who should never commit sin, that is to say, who never should resist the divine will in any way, or insult his majesty, by which they would defeat his purposes of love, by compelling him to destroy them? The difficulty seems to lie in this, that it is absolutely impossible that any created things can equal God in knowledge and judgment. This being the case, they cannot be made to look on things in the same light as that in which he looks on them ; they must, of necessitj^, form different opinions, not seeing every part of a question, and all the things that bear upon it, with that clear- ness with which God sees them — their view is partial, and their judgments must be partial like- wise. This being the case, we cannot expect that they will, by nature, and without some over- whelmingly powerful influence, act always in accordance with the judgment of God, and in opposition to their own. On the contrary, if a free-will is given them, we must expect that it will be acted on, and experience confirms our ex- pectations. Under these circumstances, it is plain, that, by how much greater is the amount of intelligence, strength, and power to act, by so much greater THE CREATION OF ANIMATED THINGS. 17 will be the danger^ the confusion^ disorder^ and mischief. Yet, a system of checks, by fear of punishment alone, evidently could not answer the purpose which God, our Heavenly Father, has in view, because such a system would be fatal to the happiness of the creature, in consequence of his wishes and in- tentions being continually interfered with by the fear of evil consequences, and the effects of God^s vengeance on him for his faults. ^^ Fear hath torment.^^ And, again, such a system would no doubt fail of the object of preventing rebellion and evil, as our earthly experience has shown us is very commonly the case; for a fear of punish- ment is a very ineffectual check on crime. We must, of course, put aside at once, and en- tirely, the notion that the object desired could be in any way attained, merely by giving sense and judgment to the created thing, so as to enable him to form opinions and possess desires of his own, without the power of acting in any way up to those feelings ; for, in the first place, God being a Spirit, the soul or spirit of a man must be sub- jected to him as much as the body ; but even if this were not necessary, the possession of a free will and free desires, without a power to act, in some measure, at least, in accordance with them, would be a slavery far worse than that of the African negro under the severest of masters, for the negro slave enjoys some liberty in having his c 18 THE GOODNESS OF GOD MANIFESTED IN thoughts secret, and his hours of sleep, when he is, for the time, unconscious of his misfortunes, and the seasons, also, when his master^s eyes are turned away from him ; but these periods of relief would never come for him who had the will, but not the power, to rebel against God, '' who know- eth the very secrets of the heart,^^ and whose eye is always watchful, whose presence is everywhere. " Lord, thou hast searched me, and known me. Thou knowest my down-sitting and mine up-rising ; thou understandest my thought afar off. Thou compassest my path, and my lying down, and art acquainted with all my ways. For there is not a word in my tongue, but, lo, Lord, thou knowest it altogether. Whither shall I go from thy Spirit, or whither shall I flee from thy presence ? If I ascend up into heaven, thou art there : if I make my bed in hell, behold, thou art there. If I say, Surely the darkness shall cover me; even the night shall be light about me. Yea, the darkness hideth not from thee ; but the night shineth as the day : the darkness and the light are both alike to thee.^' And here it might be considered whether the punishment of the wicked in a future state may, or may not, in a great measure consist in a forced obedience to the will of God in all things, while they are cursed with desires and inclinations, in direct opposition thereto. They, being hardened against their Creator, and full of hatred and im- potent rage, would torment themselves with an THE CREATION OF ANIM^VTED THINGS. 19 obstinate determination to rebel, if it be possible ; for God has said, by the mouth of his prophet Isaiah, xlv. 23, '^ I have sworn by myself, the word is gone out of my mouth in righteous- ness, and shall not return, That unto me every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear /^ and we must conclude, that if any shall obstinately refuse to submit to God's will voluntarily, he will be compelled to do so of necessity. It appears to me that there are two ways only by which it is possible to gain the object, which we have set out with supposing to have been aimed at by the Almighty, when he created living beings who should be sensible of pleasure and pain. The fxrst of these is by forming a race of crea- tures of an exceedingly low intellect and small powers, who not being able, in consequence of a want of intelligence, to insult the divine majesty, either by blasphemous language, or in any other way, nor to do such things as would produce utter disorder, confusion, and misery in the world, may be safely left without any actual law at all. These must be guided, nevertheless, in some fashion, but the controlling force must not be reason, which seems to be too dangerous an instrument to be placed in the possession of irresponsible beings (for if there is no law there can be no responsi- bility), but it must be an inferior faculty, such, for instance, as instinct. Such a race of hving, sensible creatures God 20 THE GOODNESS OF GOD MANIFESTED IN has made, and they may be recognised in the ani- mals of various sorts and grades existing in the world, and which are guided, not by reason, but by instinct, and apparently are incapable of blas- phemy and rebellion. These cannot commit sin, although they do many things which, in reasoning creatures, would be considered great crimes, and are forbidden positively by the Almighty Uuler of all things. They commit robbery, murder, incest, and other things of a like nature, and they have no regard for their parents after they cease to be dependent upon them for support ; nor do they possess, if we are to judge by appearances, any feelings of reverence to God, or of charitable kind- ness towards each other. There is another way by which the object aimed at may be, yea, and has been, accomplished, by Him who is Almighty. It would appear, indeed, at first sight, impossible for living beings, pos- sessed of a high order of intellect, a free will of their own, and a great degree of liberty, with power of action not excessively limited, to exist for ever in a state of perfect obedience, in thought, word, and deed, to a supreme governor, and while so doing, to enjoy real, unalloyed, and unbounded happiness. It required, indeed, the infinite wis- dom of God to contrive, and his infinite power to carry out successfully, a plan by which these several aims should be secured at one and the same time. But that which does to man appear I THE CREATION OF ANIMATED THINGS. 21 impossible, presents no insurmountable obstacle to God, who has accomplished this most wonder- ful work, in a way which he has himself explained, for he has made innumerable creatures fore- ordained to eternal happiness, of whom it may be truly said that he foreknew that they would be induced voluntarily to give up their own will in all things to their heavenly Lord ; so that, pos- sessed of the power to resist and rebel, they should not do so, although their judgment, inferior as it is to his, w^ould lead them naturally to differ in opinion from their Sovereign. It is indeed true, that some have been per- mitted to run so completely into obstinate re- bellion, that a fearful punishment has been awarded them. How this has come to pass, and how it agrees with the acknowledged purpose of an Almighty God, to shower down happiness on all his creatures, is a matter beyond our compre- hension ; but we can surely receive on trust those things which he does not think fit to explain, knowing that he does all things well; we must remember that our position naturally leads us to place the divine attribute of mercy in the chief place, while we leave the other attributes, and es- pecially that of justice, more out of sight than their importance requires. In this world, the poor man almost invariably considers liberality in his richer neighbour to be the greatest of virtues ; and charity, interpreted in 22 THE GOODNESS OF GOD MANIFESTED IN the common acceptation of the word, does with him indeed cover a multitude of sins. Therefore, there is nothing strange in the circumstance, that we, who have everything to gain by the mercy of God, should be too much inclined to look on that attribute as by far the most important and excel- lent of all, while we undervalue those other attri- butes, which are quite as necessary to the perfec- tion of the divine nature. But to return to the plan by which our Almighty Father has contrived to produce a voluntary obe- dience to himself on the part of his creatures ; this plan seems to have been carried out in two ways — as far, at least, as we can discern by what we read in Holy Scripture ; — first, by creating the angels a race of beings to whom he has apparently given such a degree of knowledge, that they were at once able clearly to see, not by experience, but by understanding, what must be the necessary efi*ects of rebellion on the one hand, and obedience on the other, and to comprehend, also, the excel- lencies and perfections of God, and, being struck with admiration, humbly to worship at his foot- stool. Now it seems evident, that, in those cases where this knowledge, so bestowed, fails of preserving the creature from forming his own opinions, and acting upon them in defiance of God, there can be no repentance, to all appearance at least, and therefore, of necessity, no forgiveness; because, I THE CREATION OF ANIMATED THINGS. 23 the eyes having been fully opened from the first to all the consequences of any course of conduct, they will be no more opened by any experience of those consequences; so that — as in the case of the devil and his angels — the sin beings in the first instance^ an open^ daring, and wilful rebellion against God's supreme authority, it seems pro- bable that there can never be a change to a better or wiser disposition ; they learn not by experience, even the experience of ages; they believe and tremble ; but the feeling which led them into their crime, causes them to remain obstinate therein. On this account, it appears as though the Almighty considered that an opportunity for repentance would be to them of no avail; for St. Peter saith, " God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment ;^^ and St. Jude also observes, that '' the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habi- tation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains, under darkness, unto the judgment of the great day." In the second place, the Almighty has carried out his plan by the creation of another race of beings, whom he introduces into life, possessing at first only the rudiments, as it were, of an intel- lect, and kept in restraint, even after the intelli- gence has made great progress by a general weakness and a want of power to caiTy into efi'ect 24 THE GOODNESS OF GOD MANIFESTED IN those things which are desired by them. This race may be gradually taught by experience that which God desires it to learn ; so that, when he thinks fit to enlarge its powers of thought and action^ it may be induced, partly by the experience it has gained, and partly by the knowledge im- parted to it from outward sources, to give up its own will freely to its supreme Lord, all its past acts of rebellion up to this time being forgiven by the means he has ordained ; namely, by the sacri- fice of the death of our Lord Jesus Christ. All his dealings, therefore, with these his creatures have for their object this end ; namely, the in- ducing them to give up, of their own free choice, their will to him. The course he pursues seems generally to be as follows : — He aims at teaching them to doubt their own judgment and their own powers, which is exactly the opposite course to that which the serpent followed in his temptation of Eve, whom he persuaded by falsehoods to believe that she was capable, as God, of discerning between good and evil. This want of confidence in self pro- duces, as a natural consequence, a conviction that external aid is required. God then shows, by a long-continued course of kindness, and by the in- numerable blessings he showers down, and by his fatherly providence, by his kindness of lan- guage, and by his faithfulness and truth, that he is worthy of confidence, as being the kind friend, THE CREATION OP ANIMATED THINGS. 25 the benefactor, the father, all- wise and true, so that with the knowledge which the created being enjoys of the divine goodness shown forth in his creation, preservation, and in all the blessings of this life, and, above all, in the redemption of the world by the Lord Jesus Christ^s death, he be- comes convinced of God^s love for himself ; and having confidence in him and none in himself, together with a perfect assurance that opposition to the divine will must produce nothing but un- mixed evil to himself, he learns to give up his own will and judgment to his Creator ; this is that faith which the apostles preach, — the source of all obedience and holiness of life, producing these as naturally as the doubts of God instilled into Eve by the Tempter produced disobedience, and became the source of all evil to mankind. It being, then, the object of God to produce in man this confidence in himself for the good of man, he is of necessity very jealous, as the Scrip- tures describe him, of his own honour, because respect is undoubtedly necessary to the produc- tion of confidence ; we cannot trust confidently in one whom we do not respect, and to produce respect it is necessary that the honour be carefully preserved uninjured. It must be confessed that God has acted in such a manner towards us from the beginning as to entitle him in every way to our utmost reverence and confidence. He not only created us and gave all earthly blessings into 26 THE GOODNESS OF GOD MANIFESTED IN our hands, but has shown clearly that his excel- lencies are greater than we can understand, and he has completed his goodness towards us by giving his own Son to suffer on the cross for our sakes. Man, then, has been created with a very high order of intellect, sufficient to enable him to at- tain to a high position ; he also has a will of his own, and the power, to a certain limited degree, of thinking and acting for himself; he is not like unto horse or mule, without understanding, whose mouths must be held with bit and bridle ; neither is he a slave endowed with a mind and will of his own without the power to act in any way accord- ing thereto ; nor again is he like the angels pos- sessed in the beginning of knowledge sufficient for him without experience : but he is born weak in body, ignorant in mind, and without even the power of reasoning; his intellect, however, be- comes enlarged by degrees, and his bodily powers become strengthened ; and while this is going on, his experience increases, and he undergoes a training which exercises on all a very great effect, though not on all the full effect desired. Thus trained, he possesses also a portion of the divine nature, i.e. a never-dying soul ; yet he cannot, with his limited capacity, view things in the same light as that in which Infinite Wisdom views them, and his judgment is necessarily very different. As the opinions and thoughts of an inexperienced THE CREATION OF ANIMATED THINGS. 27 child will certainly differ from those of a man who has lived many years in the world, so will the thoughts and opinions of a man differ from the perfect judgment of the All-seeing God. This will certainly produce in the man a desire to judge and act for himself, independently of any control ; and the power to act being, in some measure at least, given, the consequence must necessarily be, in the natural course of things, in- subordination and rebellion, either open or with an attempt at concealment : but this, as I have already observed, must, from the very nature of God and the necessities of created things, be ruinous to the rebel. There was an example of all this in the case of Eve, who, though not as yet corrupted by the actual commission of sin, showed the natural inherent desire of an intellectual being to think and judge for herself. She wished to be as God, to know good and evil ; and, judging that no harm could result by acting for herself, and contrary to the commands of her Creator, she followed her own course to her own undoing. What motive, then, can in this case be given to intelligent, immortal creatures, possessed thus of a free will and a certain amount of power to act for themselves, sufficiently powerful to cause them to give up their will and judgment freely to God ? A course which I have endeavoured to show is absolutely necessary, both to their happiness and their safety. 28 THE GOODNESS OF GOD MANIFESTED IN The only motive consistent with their happiness (fear being inconsistent therewith) is the before- named conviction that their own judgment is un- worthy to be relied on, together with a settled conviction of the infallible judgment, the perfect truth, and the unchangeable good feeling of God towards them, and the certainty that if they will trust to him, and place themselves in his hands, he will do all things well for them, and each separate thing also better than they could possibly do it for themselves. To this end God began at the very first by giving to Adam and Eve an opportunity of con- tinuing in the state in which he first placed them, namely, in a complete and blind confidence in him. I use the word blind advisedly, for it is said of them, when they had eaten the forbidden fruit, in contrast with their previous state, that their eyes were opened. This state in which they were first created God knew would of neces- sity not last ; and, indeed, if it had continued, then assuredly their intellect must have remained uncultivated and unexercised, and experience would have been wanting to teach them the weak- ness of their own judgment and the happiness of their position by the contrast of it with a diff'erent state, and there would, therefore, to all appearance at least, have remained for ever a danger of falling. But the devil, in his endeavour to oppose God, THE CREATION OF ANIMATED THINGS. 29 set Eve on using the powers of thought and judg- ment within her — powers which she possessed in consequence of her immortal nature — to use, I say, these powers independently of God, and, as was to be expected, her weak and imperfect judg- ment necessarily led her astray. After the fall of this woman and her husband, God dealt with them and their descendants as a father deals with his children, sometimes chas- tising, and at other times rewarding, sometimes intimidating, and at other times encouraging, but always endeavouring to produce in them a child- like confidence in his wisdom, his truth, his providence, and his fatherly love. This Moses showed in his exhortation to the Israelites before bis death, and after their forty years^ wanderings in the wilderness, saying, " Thou shalt remember all the way which the Lord thy God led thee these forty years in the wilderness, to humble thee and to prove thee ; and he humbled thee, and suffered thee to hunger, and fed thee with manna, which thou knewest not : neither did thy fathers know that he might make thee know that man doth not live by bread only, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of the Lord doth man live. Thou shalt also consider in thine heart that as a man chasteneth his son, so the Lord thy God chasteneth thee.^^ St. Paul also teaches the same lesson, even more clearly, in the twelfth chapter of his Epistle to the Hebrews : 30 THE GOODNESS OF GOD MANIFESTED IN " My soiij despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him : for whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. If ye endure chastening, God dealeth w4th you as with sons ; for what son is he whom the father chas- teneth not ? But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons/^ The earnest desire on the part of God our Heavenly Father to produce in us this confidence in his favourable regards towards us, is shown in many parts of Holy Scripture, but probably in none more plainly than in the words of St. Paul, in his second Epistle to the Corinthians, in the latter part of the fifth cliapter : " God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself. Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us : we pray you in Christ^s stead, be ye reconciled to God/"* Thus we arrive at the very important knowledge of the real and true signification of that faith which God requires of us as necessary to our eternal salvation, and of the manner in which it becomes productive of good works ; this faith is nothing less than a perfect confidence in the fatherly love, the perfect wisdom, and the unfailing truth of God our heavenly Parent, and the heart- felt conviction that in whatever matter, however minute, we trust to self, and depart from his THE CREATION OF ANIMATED THINGS. 31 guidance^ we must necessarily fall into mischief. In factj this faith signifies the placing ourselves implicitly in his hands, giving up voluntarily our own will and judgment to him, and of necessity submitting ourselves actively and passively to him in all things. How perfect is the contrast be- tween this and the feelings instilled into the mind of Eve by the Tempter, and by which she was led into her first act of rebellion ! This faith, so necessary for our eternal good, the Almighty desires to produce in us by every possible means ; and amongst other plans for so doing, he has most graciously condescended to bestow on us of his goodness, from time to time, various outward and visible signs, as continual and lasting pledges of various promises, by the sight of which signs he has habituated us to the practice of recalling to memory those promises and the fulfilment of them. Thus, in ages long passed away, he gave to man the sign of the rain- bow in the clouds as the pledge of a covenant at that time made; and even to this very day does he continue to us the same sign as a memorial of his faithful performance of the promise and a pledge for the future. He also gave to Abraham and the Jews the sign of circumcision, a pledge and a perpetual memorial, first to the patriarchs of his promises not then fulfilled, and afterwards to their descendants of the faithful and miraculous performance of them. And now he gives to the 32 THE GOODNESS OF GOD MANIFESTED, ETC. Christian the two holy sacraments, Baptism and the Lord^s Supper, as pledges of his love and of the fulfilment of his promises through our Lord Jesus Christ : first, that he will adopt us by the Holy Spirit as his children and his heirs ; and next that he will receive us in union with his beloved Son to a share in the glories and happi- ness of heaven. Of both these wonderful and glorious tokens of his love I have somew^hat to say, but shall defer the subject of them to the following chapters. 33 CHAPTER III. THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM; WHETHER OR NO IT BE A CONDITION OF THE CHRISTIAN COVE- NANT. *' The like figure whereunto, even baptism, doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience towards God), by the resurrection of Jesus Christ."— 1 Pet. iii. 21. There are, as we know, two sacraments ordained by our Lord Jesus Christ, namely. Baptism and the Lord^s Supper. These are outward and visible signs, tokens, and pledges of God^s love towards us, and of the fulfilment of the promises which he has made, and to which he has bound himself in the most solemn manner, '' having confirmed them by an oath, in order that by two immutable things, in which it is impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation who have fled for refuge ta lay hold upon the hope set before us." They are granted unto us for the purpose of establishing our faith, which, by what was said in the previous chapter, is shown to be absolutely necessary for producing in us obedience. D 34 THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. These promises bestowed on us by God, together with the conditions attached, are altogether advan- tageous to us ; and he, desiring that we should not hesitate to believe fully in them, has graciously condescended to take especial means to establish them so firmly that we may justly be assured that they cannot fail of accomplishm.ent ; for this pur- pose he has granted unto us the two perpetual tokens and pledges of their fulfilment. We then have the high privilege of possessing two religious ceremonies which are pledges of the establishment and performance of a covenant most favourable in its conditions to ourselves ; and the question has arisen with some persons, whether these two religious rites, or either of them, are necessary to the confirmation of the covenant? or, whether the contract is complete and binding in those cases where either or both of them have been neglected ? I speak especially of the sacra- ment of baptism, and shall confine myself to that alone at present, and consider, whether, as some suppose, God's promises of salvation are confined to those persons who have been admitted into the Church by this sacrament, and all others are left to his uncovenanted mercies ; or whether all be- lievers, even if they have not received this sacra- ment, are justified in considering God^s mercies secured to them as eff'ectually as to others by the infallible promise of God. In short, I would inquire, whether this sacrament THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. 35 is intended to operate as a restriction on the free oiFer of forgiveness of sin through our blessed Lord^s death, or as being the means of making that offer more generally available and accepted ; for, if it should turn out that before we can make the promises available, or apply them in any way to ourselves, it is really necessary to receive the outward and visible sign, — that is to say, that the promises are only made, and the blessings of the covenant only assured, to the baptized : then the sacrament necessarily becomes restrictive, because it may so happen that an individual, having at- tended to all the other requisites, has neglected this one, and, in consequence, is unable to believe in or apply the covenant to his own case, neither is he permitted to do so; and the restrictive opera- tion becomes still more decided when applied to infants, because we may suppose, though this is not necessarily the case, that the neglect of bap- tism is in adults entirely, or in some measure at least, their own fault. I will illustrate the position I take by mention- ing the effects of certain alterations which were made in this country in the law of Wills about the year 1837, when, in order to prevent the improper insertion of additional clauses into a Will after the Testator had signed it, it was enacted that the sig- nature must be placed immediately after the last words of the document. This regulation, as long as it lasted, had unfortunately the effect of pro- 36 THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. ducing greater inconveniences even than those it was intended to obviate, for many Wills which were good in every other respect were rejected when brought into Court for Probate on this ground only, that a space was left between the writing in the body of the Will and the signature. In like manner, the necessity of outward baptism being performed before the faithful penitent or the infant who has not committed actual sin can partake in the covenant, all other necessary conditions being complied with, would cause some to fail thereof who otherwise would enjoy the blessing : and the difficulty is not greatly lessened if we say such a person is left to the uncovenanted mercies of a merciful God ; for it is manifest that an individual in such a position can have no confidence, no as- surance, but an uncertain hope only, that mercy will be extended unto him likewise as unto others. Notwithstanding this difficulty, if Holy Scrip- ture does actually teach that this rite is necessary to salvation, or that without it no covenant is entered into, we are of necessity bound to believe it, without hesitation or question ; but it behoves us to consider this point with great care, and to accept it only after clear evidence of its truth. After much consideration I have myself come to the conclusion, that the covenant is complete without the sacrament of baptism, that is to say, that the outward and visible sign is not in any sense a condition of the covenant, but that every THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. 37 believer in the Lord Jesus Christ, and ever}^ infant dying before it has committed actual sin, is a par- taker in the promises, and can by God^s goodness claim the fulfilment of them in his own person irrespective of the sacrament ; while, at the same time, I of necessity also hold that every person is bound to partake in the holy ordinance, as a duty which he owes to his Heavenly Sovereign, but not as a condition of the covenant. I will now proceed to give some of my reasons for holding these opinions. And, first, be it observed that in no place in Holy Scripture is any direct command given gene- rally to mankind to receive the rite of baptism, although the command to administer it is clear. When Peter visited Cornelius they of the circum- cision were astonished at the Holy Ghost falling on the Gentiles ; and it is plain that this was the only thing which induced Peter and those who were with him to consent to the baptism of Gen- tiles, showing that they looked on this sacrament not as a duty, but as a great privilege which hitherto they had jealously guarded as peculiarly their own. Peter showed this feeling by his inquiry, " Can any man forbid water that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?^^ When Philip was teaching the eunuch, baptism was asked by the latter as a favour which he felt doubtful whether he would be permitted to receive; and, in fact, it appears 38 THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. plain that baptism was considered, and ought to be so considered, as a privilege which every be- liever would most earnestly seek for, and which was not to be refused him ; while the thought of it as a duty does not seem to have been so much entertained, and a privilege indeed it is to be per- mitted to receive the pledge of the fulfilment of God^s most gracious promises. In tlie next place, I assume that baptism is in the Christian very much the same thing as cir- cumcision was in the Jewish church, namely, the sign or seal of the righteousness of faith which a person is supposed to possess before he is baptized ; for it is acknowledged by all that there is no effi- cacy in the baptism of those who are old enough to understand their duties except there is faith in the promises of God, and confession, — that is, the confession of Christ with the mouth, and belief in him within the heart, which two things, St. Paul tells us, shall save a man. "If thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved: for with the heart man believeth unto righteousness, and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation ; for whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved. ■'^ Now it is remarkable that in the first case of the baptism of a Gentile, viz. Cornelius, he was evidently in possession already of the righteousness of faith before baptism, which in THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. 39 his case was actually and undoubtedly the seal stamped afterwards of that which was previously in his possession. It has, indeed^ been continually asserted that his case was an exceptional one. To this I cannot for one moment consent; on the contrary, the cir- cumstance that it was the first case of Gentile baptism, makes it, in my opinion, the example, and not the exception; for it was evidently of especial importance to make this case, which from its prominent position would be likely to be used as an example in all future times, accord exactly with that which it was intended to teach. It must be remembered that those things which God does difi'er from those which men do in one remarkable particular, viz., that every beginning of a new system may with man be looked upon in some measure as an experiment, wherein the actor by experience learns to improve upon his first at- tempts, but with God no experience can be re- quired, nor change produced in consequence of the acquisition of greater knowledge on his part. The creation of Eve was exceptional, as every one will acknowledge, for since her time women have been born into the world precisely in the same way as men ; yet St. Paul founds an argument on her creation which has been accepted by all : " I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence, for Adam was first formed, then Eve.^'' 40 THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. According to these things it would appear that the outward form of baptism is intended to be the means of drawing men towards God, and facilita- ting their salvation ; that it is not so directly a duty as a privilege, granted to us by God Almighty, of which it is expected that we shall most eagerly and joyfully avail ourselves. In an indirect way, indeed, this privilege becomes a very important duty, because it would undoubtedly be an offen- sive thing for persons in our situation to reject any favour offered unto us by our Sovereign Lord and heavenly King. We might, indeed, in dealing with an equal, or with one raised just a step above us, declare that we are satisfied with his bare word, and desire no pledge or confirmation thereof, but with our dread Lord and Sovereign it would be presumptuous so to act. As it would be improper to demand any further confirmation or pledge of his word than that which he has of his own free goodness granted us, so it would be ungracious and presumptuous to refuse any pledge which he has offered, and we might be considered as undervaluing his goodness and con- descension. This lesson is taught us plainly in our Lord's parable of the feast which was made by a certain king on the occasion of the marriage of his son, wherein he is described as justly indignant at the refusal of his invitations by many of the expected guests, who are looked upon as having griev- THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. 4J ously and wantonly insulted him by their con- duct. Let us now further consider whether Holy Scripture confirms the view I have taken, that though baptism is in reality a duty binding on all believers in Jesus Christ, yet it is not a condition of salvation, nor absolutely necessary to the intro- duction of the individual into the privileges of the Christian covenant : in short, whether it may seem to show that the promises given to the believer are bestowed on the unbaptized as well as the baptized. In order to this I intend to refer you to the arguments contained in the third chapter of St. PauFs Epistle to the Galatians, and the fourth chapter of his Epistle to the Romans. In the fourth chapter of the Epistle to the Romans, the Apostle argues as follows : viz., ^'that Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him for righteousness -/' and that to any man who worketh not, but believeth on him that justi- fieth the ungodly, his faith is in like manner counted for righteousness ; that this blessedness comes on both the circumcised and the uncircum- cised also, for in Abraham^s case it came on him while yet he was uncircumcised, and he received circumcision afterwards, as a seal of the righteous- ness of faith which was already in his possession : all of which happened to him in this exact order, that he might be the father of the circumcised 42 THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. and of the uncircumcised also, for the promise was given to Abraham and his seed, not through the law, but through the righteousness of faith, for he believed God^s promise that Sarah should have a son. This statement that Abraham^s faith was imputed to him for righteousness was written for our sakes, to whom also it shall be imputed if we believe on him who raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead. This argument is explained by a comparison of it with the third chapter of the Epistle to the Galatians, wherein the apostle saith that Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness; and that they who are of faith are children and heirs of Abraham, and are blessed together with him to whom God had before preached the Gospel. That Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law in order that the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ. He then argues that the covenant made by God with Abraham could not be added to or substracted from at any time after it was once confirmed; because, even in a man^s cove- nant once established, no man disannulleth or addeth thereto ; so that it was impossible that the law, which was not in existence till four hundred and thirty years afterwards, could be added as a condition ; that it was added only as a temporary check on transgressions until the seed should come to whom the promise was made, and was THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. 43 only a schoolmaster to bring us to Christ ; and all who arc his, are Abraham^s seed, and heirs according to the covenant. Or to put the same argument in other words. Abraham received a promise, on a certain con- dition, which, in his own case, was already per- formed in full; viz., that he should believe in God. The same promise, on the same condition, is given to us ; and we may claim it in the cha- racter of Abraham's children and heirs, if we per- form the condition. God has even gone so far, in his gracious condescension, as to put it out of his own power, justly to exact from us any single condition of any sort whatsoever which was not exacted of Abraham at the time when the promise or covenant was first made; and, therefore, the law is not and cannot be binding on us as a condition thereof, for that nothing but faith is binding as a condition ; and the apostle evidently applies this argument to the rite of circumcision especially ; because after carrying out, in the fourth chapter, the ideas which have entered his head regarding those who are the heirs of Abraham, he goes on, in the fifth chapter, to say, " Stand fast, therefore, in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage. Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. Tor I testify again to every man that is circum- cised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law.'^ 44 THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. If God, then, has bound himself to demand nothing further of us as a condition of our in- heriting the promise, than he did of Abraham, it is evident that the rite of baptism must be ex- cluded as well as that of circumcision, and that it stands only on the same footing as the other did with the Jews in St. PauFs time, who said, Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping the commandments of God ; that is to say, baptism is an act of dutiful obedience to our Sovereign Lord and King, but not a condition of the covenant of promise. But there are several verses in the Holy Scrip- tures which seem at first sight to indicate that the outward form of baptism is the means by which salvation and forgiveness of sin is granted to the penitent believer ; thus the ex- hortation of Ananias to Saul, as given in Acts, xxii. 16, "Arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord,'^ is considered by many as proving that sins are washed away by the water of baptism ; but this argument will, I think, appear by no means so strong when we consider the general circumstances of the case. Saul, who was a young man of high attainments and great ambition, and whose edu- cation had been most carefully attended to, had been, up to this time, a bitter and zealous per- secutor of the Church of Christ, by which course he reasonably expected to rise to a high and im- I THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. 45 portant position amongst his countrymen. All these earthly advantages and hopes of promotion must be given up, if he should become openly a disciple of our Lord Jesus Christ; and he would even subject himself to great contempt and per- secution thereby, which would be the more violent because of the grievous disappointment which he would cause to those who had learnt to look on him as the great champion of their cause. While on the other hand, our Lord had declared, " Who- soever shall confess me before men, him will I also confess before my Father which is in heaven ; but whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven/' He had also ordained baptism as the outward form by which the convert was to be admitted into the visible church, and make the public confession of his faith. Here, then, was offered unto Saul a test of his sincerity; if he refused it, it would be plain that he had not faith sufficient to enable him to face the danger and submit to the shame and loss for Christ's sake ; but if he openly confessed his service and entered his church by that only outward form which our Lord had ordained for that purpose, surely it might be said to him. Thy sins are washed away, without attributing the effect in any way to the efficacy of the religious rite ; and surely, also, his baptism was so different an act from that of one who suffers no earthly loss whatsoever 46 THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. thereby, but rather gain, that no parallel can be drawn between them. The fifth verse of the third chapter of St. John is considered by some to prove that the promise of eternal salvation is not given to any but the baptized. If this is the case, it proves more than they who use the argument would themselves ac- knowledge; because this verse most clearly asserts, that the birth by water and the Spirit is absolutely necessary to the admission of any person into the kingdom of heaven, and leaves no loophole whatsoever, for the uncovenanted mercies of God. It is of course necessary, before any argument can be founded on a text of this sort, to define clearly the meaning of the words of it. The term here used, " The kingdom of heaven,^' is often in- troduced in the gospels, and I believe, seldom, if ever, refers to heaven itself, but only to our Lord^s kingdom on earth, the Christian dispensation. In the parable of the tares in the field, it is plain that the expression can only apply to something which precedes the day of judgment ; so like- wise the parables of the treasure found in the field, and the pearl found by the merchant, to secure which the finders go away and sell all they have to obtain the means of purchasing. In like manner, the parables of the mustard-seed, the leaven, and several others, describe the kingdom of heaven in such a manner, that it cannot pos- • THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. 47 sibly refer to anything but that which happens durinc; this life. The expression '^ water and spirit/^ does not very clearly define itself. In the Douay Testa- mentj the words are rendered "water and the Holy Spirit/^ which is evidently WTong^ for "Holy^^ is not to be found in the Greek. The primary meaning of the words bdoj^ and irvsv/j^a, is water, and wind or breath ; and 'jmv/jba is so ren- dered in the eighth verse, " The wind bloweth w^here it listeth.''^ Now it is undoubtedly opposed to all the rules of language, that two words coupled together, as these are, in the same sen- tence, should be translated or interpreted, one in the primary or literal, and the other in a secon- dary or figurative sense. Therefore, according to rule, they ought to be understood to signify water, and wind or breath; or else, if one is taken in a secondary or figurative signification, the other ought to be so taken also. Water, and wind or breath, are both emble- matic of the Holy Spirit's influences — the first of the purifying, the second of the enlivening efiects of his work — w^hich tw^o operations are spoken of in St. PauFs epistle to Titus, as of two distinct things : " Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Ghost, w^hich he hath shed on us abundantly, through Jesus Christ our Saviour." 48 THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. Water is repeatedly used in the Holy Scripture to signify purification, not of earthly substances only, but also of the mind and conscience; as when Pilate washed his hands before the multi- tude, to declare that he was free from the blood of Christ. Water was also used under the law, to purify those sacred things which would not bear the fire. Wind, or breath, is used to signify the begin- ning or renewal of life, both natural and spiritual. God breathed into the nostrils of Adam, and he became a living soul. Ezekiel was commanded to prophesy unto certain dry bones in a valley, and, although they joined to each other in proper order, and the flesh, skin, and muscles, grew over and covered them, so that they looked like men, yet there was no life in them, until, by the word of the Lord, he prophesied to the wind, and called on it to come and blow over them, when they rose up a mighty army of living, breathing men. Ezek. xxxvii. Then we have examples of the application of both these two material things — namely, water, and breath or wind, as illustrations of the Holy Spirit's influences, by our Lord Jesus Christ him- self. Water is applied in the ordinance of bap- tism, and in the washing of the disciples' feet; and breath is applied when after his resurrection he breathed on the apostles, and said unto them, " Receive ye the Holy Ghost.'"' 1 THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. 49 There are several instances in which the word crvs-j/xa is translated ^^ spirit ^^ in our version of the Bible, when '^ breath '' would seem more suit- able. In the second chapter of the epistle of St. James, the twenty-sixth verse, is the expression, " The body without the spirit — cn/s-j/xa — is dead,^^ which clearly signifies the breath ; because a body is not necessarily dead when without a spirit or soulj although, if totally without breath, it is dead. Another instance we have, in the fifth chapter of the first epistle of St. John, the seventh and eighth verses : " There are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost ; and there are three that bear witness on earth, the cr^2y/x6t, the water, and the blood." In this latter verse, the word -ttvs'j/acc apparently does not apply to the Divine Spirit, for the following reasons : first, if we receive the former verse as authentic, because the word '' Holy " which is there used is here omitted, and because, also, that blessed person is one of the heavenly witnesses, therefore he can hardly with propriety be spoken of here as an earthly witness also; and second, even if the former verse be rejected, the earthly witnesses ought to be earthly things, namely, the breath which had left our Lord's body, and the water and blood which came forth from his side, separated, — all three proving incontestably his actual death. That St. John considered this testimony very £ 50 THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. important seems evident, by the remarks which he makes in the nineteenth chapter of his gospel^ wherein, having told us that the soldiers brake not our Lord's legs when they brake those of the two thieves, because he was already dead, which fact they knew, I presuQ)e, by his having ceased to breathe ; and having told us also that one of them pierced his side, and caused water and blood to flow from the wound, proceeds to say, " He that saw it bear record, and his record is true, and he knoweth that he saith true, that ye might believe." Having, therefore, now endeavoured to define the meaning of the words of this fifth verse of the third chapter of St. John^s Gospel, I have come to the conclusion that the true signification is as follows : — Except a man be purified by the Holy Spirit, and restored to spiritual life by the breath of God, that life which Adam possessed at first, but from which he died when he fell, he cannot become a true disciple of Jesus Christ, and a true member of his Church on earth. This view of the case seems to be confirmed when we consider the circumstances which pre- ceded and called forth our Lord^s observation. Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews, came to him by night, and the first words he uttered were, " Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher come from God, for no man can do these miracles that thou doest except God be with him." What THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. 51 could we expect that our Lord would say to one who, with such a belief, was yet afraid openly to confess him ; and who, acknowledging that the ruling body, of which he was still a member, knew the same thing, while they obstinately resisted this divine teacher, yet remained one of them, and shared in their wicked conduct ? We should assuredly expect that our Lord would administer to him a very severe rebuke. Nicode- mus apparently wished to be a disciple of Jesus Christ, that is, to be one of those favoured persons who should partake of the privileges of that king- dom which he supposed was about to be estab- lished on earth ; but he wished also to retain those honours and dignities which he already possessed amongst the great men of the time, until he should be able to see how things were likely to turn out ; he wished, in fact, to gain all that could be gained, but to risk nothing, and to assist in nothing : he was aiming at standing well with both sides. Our Lord at once saw through him, and put a stop to such a notion, saying, " Except a man be born again, except he be changed entirely by the Holy Spirit^s influence, all the old evil washed out of him, and a new life breathed into him, he cannot enjoy the privileges of the new kingdom, which I am now about to establish, this kingdom of God or of heaven. ^^ Which was giving him clearly to understand that 52 THE SACRAMENT OF BAPTISM. there could be no union of the old and the new, — no time-serving, no half measures. In supposing that the outward form of baptism is not ordained of God as a thing absolutely necessary to salvation, or to the ratification of the covenant, as far as that relates to the individual, it may possibly be said that I am denying the doctrine of the Church, as stated in the Catechism. Such an assertion would not, I am aware, be made by any one who considered the strict literal and natural meaning of the words of the Catechism^ wherein it is said there are two sacraments only ordained by Christ, as generally necessary to sal- vation. This word " generally '' I understand to be used in the opposite sense to absolutely ; for if it were intended by the Church to teach that they were always necessary, this would be sufficiently and more clearly expressed by leaving out the word " generally '^ altogether, and simply saying that there two sacraments ordained as necessary to salvation. That these are generally necessary does not seem to me in any way inconsistent with what I have already said ; for though they are not, as I beheve, conditions of the covenant of promise, yet a wilful neglect of them would be, undoubtedly, a great sin, as showing a contempt of the glorious privilege which our heavenly Father has given to us, the privilege of receiving a pledge from him THE SACKAMENT OF BAPTISM. 53 of our acloption as his children ; and, moreover, as an actual disobedience to his command in the one case ; and if not an actual^ assuredly a virtual dis- obedience in the other. 54 CHAPTER IV. ST. PAUL S POSITION IN THE CHURCH. * ' The gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter." — Gal. ii. 7. In considering the last subject, I have referred especiall}^ to the arguments of St. Paul, contained in the fourth chapter of his epistle to the Romans, and the third chapter of his epistle to the Gala- tians ; and this not unnaturally leads me to some inquiry relating to the position which this apostle held in the Church of Christ. St. Paul calls himself the apostle to the Gentiles; and it is curious to see the way in which, from his first conversion, although as a Jew his inclinations would naturally lead him to preach to Jews, he was forcibly set apart for the ministry to the Gentiles. Ananias, when commanded to go to Saul and preach the Gospel to him, was told that God had determined to send him to bear the name of Jesus Christ to the Gentiles ; and he himself says, that our Lord appeared to him first when he was yet ST. PAULAS POSITION IN THE CHURCH. 55 lying on the ground at the time of the vision, which produced his conversion. Acts, xxvi. 16, 17; and again in the Temple at Jerusalem, chapter xxii. 21, and gave him this charge. It is farther interesting to observe the manner in which he was continuall}^ driven by the obsti- nacy and hostility of the Jews, contrary to his apparent wishes, to preach to Gentiles exclu- sively. The Jews never forgave the conversion of one whom they had looked upon as the great cham- pion of the cause of Judaism ; and their hatred was evidently increased greatly by their knowledge that he preached to Gentiles, although they them- selves in outward appearance at least often drove him to do so. Witness their ragCj described in Acts xxii., when he told them that the Lord Jesus had sent him to the Gentiles. We do not hear that they ever rose up riotously against any other of the apostles, although, indeed, they stoned Stephen. Paul shows, by several remarks, that the Gospel was committed unto him, not as to others (who were not companions of our Lord) by the teaching of men, but by a special revelation from God ; and this I presume to be one great distinction between an apostle and another, namely, that the apostle received his instructions directly from our Lord himself; and the case of Matthias was not an exception, because, as Peter said, he had ac- compauied our Lord from the baptism of John to the day that he was taken up from them; and St. Paul further shows that in his own case this mission by revelation was for the especial in- struction of the Gentiles. Besides the texts already quoted, wherein he saith that our Lord appeared to him at the time of his conversion, and again in the Temple, there is the first verse of his epistle to the Galatians, in which he calls himself '^ an apostle, not of men nor by man ; '^ and in the eleventh and twelfth verses of thesamechapter he says, '^Icertify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man ; for I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ/^ He further states that when he learnt that he was to preach to the heathen, he conferred not with flesh and blood ; that not until he had been preaching three years did he visit Peter at Jerusalem, and abode with him for the short space of fifteen days, and saw James also, but none other of the apostles, and was even unknown by face to the churches of Judea. That fourteen years afterwards he again went up to Jerusalem, and this time by revelation, that is, by an express command from God, and communicated unto the apostles the Gospel which he preached unto the Gentiles, in order to be quite certain that he had not run his race in vain. In fact, he came to compare notes with them, and this only. 57 for he showed the complete independence of his preaching on the teaching of others, by resisting certain false brethren, who tried, as he said, " to spy out our liberty,^^ namely, that of the Gentiles, and ''to bring us into bondage." Moreover, he declared that in his conference he gained no in- struction from those who seemed to be pillars of the Church, but contrariwise. In 1 Cor. ix. ver. 1, he asserts the fact of his having seen Jesus Christ. In chap. xv. he says the same thing; and in chap. xi. he says, '' I re- ceived of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you,'^ namely, the ordinance of the holy communion ; and in Eph. iii. calling himself a " prisoner for you Gentiles," he speaks of the dis- pensation of the Gospel given him for them, and says, that God had made known unto him the mystery by revelation, — the mystery which had in former ages been unknown and kept secret from man, but was now revealed, even that the Gentiles should be fellow-heirs, and of the same body, and partakers of God's promise in Christ by the Gospel. From all these things it becomes perfectly clear that the gospel which St. Paul preached to the Gentiles was learnt by him entirely through the means of especial revelations from God himself, and not by any human teaching whatsoever : in fact, that it was totally distinct from and indepen- dent of the authority of the other apostles, al- 58 ST. PAUL S POSITION IN THE CHURCH. though it was of necessity in full accordance with what they taught ; and its independence is proved by the circumstance that he preached it for no less a time than seventeen years before he thought it necessary to compare notes with the other apostles. But St. PauFs gospel being, as he himself de- clares, a distinct revelation from God, for a distinct purpose, independent wholly of the teaching of the other apostles, yet agreeing necessarily there- with, then, besides the fact, into the consideration of which I shall not now enter, that the existence of two collateral, distinct revelations and missions, independent of, yet agreeing with, one another in all respects, but addressed to two distinct bodies of men, must be the means of confirming the faith of thoughtful persons in the Divine origin of the Christian religion ; it becomes plain also that St. Paul himself must in like manner have been in- dependent wholly of the authority of the other apostles, and ordained for a distinct and indepen- dent mission ; that is to say, if the doctrine be independent the authoritative preacher of it must be independent likewise : for if a man be ordained by any particular bishop, and remain subject to his authority, the doctrine which he preaches must be also subject to the same authority : that is to say, the bishop has power first to examine into the opinions held by the candidate for orders, and refuse ordination if not satisfied that they are ST. PAUL S POSITION IN THE CHURCH. bv orthodox, and after ordination to inquire into tbe teaching, and interfere if it appears that it is heretical; but one bishop has no authority over another, nor can he interfere authoritatively with the doctrine taught in a diocese over which the other rules. Nor, again, is the curate of one parish amenable to the autliority of the curate of another. Let us then consider whether there are in Holy Scripture any further evidences of the truth of this assertion, that St. Paul was himself entirely independent from the first of the authority of the other apostles, — not merely of any one of them alone, but of the whole twelve collectively. In the account of his conversion, given in Acts ix., we learn that Ananias laid his hands on him before he was baptized, and said that Jesus who had appeared to him in the way had sent him in order that by his means Saul might recover his sight, and receive the Holy Ghost; that Saul, having regained his eyesight, was immediately baptized, and, staying certain days with the dis- ciples at Damascus, forthwith preached Christ. Now if we compare this with the case of Matthias we find a great manifest difi"erence, — here was no choice made by the apostles assembled together, or even by one alone, for no apostle even was present, neither was there here any ordination by Ananias, who, it must be remembered, laid his hands on Saul before and not after his baptism ; moreover, 60 ST. PAULAS POSITION IN THE CHURCH. Saul forthwith began to preach, evidently by the authority which he received direct from Jesus Christ himself; and certainly Ananias, who was not an apostle, could not give the apostolic office and authority to any one. In reference to these things, Paul calls himself, in the first chapter of his epistle to the Galatians, '^ an apostle not of men or by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father;^' and he says also, "When it pleased God to reveal his Son in me, immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood ;^^ he, without any authority from the other apostles, assumed the office of an apostle, and preached the gospel for seventeen years, having in that time seen only two of them, namely, Peter and James, and having remained in their company for a very short time only; at the end of those seventeen years he communicated to them the gospel which he had been preaching, but did not receive instruction from them : for he learned nothing of them, as he himself tells us ; and during that conference, or series of conferences, he withstood very de- cidedly some whose teaching he disapproved of, and would not subject himself to them in the smallest degree. On the two occasions wherein he had the op- portunity of answering for himself, and justifying his conduct in public, as described in Acts, xxii. and xxvi., it is to be observed that he did not once refer to the other apostles, or attempt to support himself by showing that he taught the same things as tbey did; neither can I call to memory a single instance of his confirming any doctrine which he taught by an appeal to them in any way: he always seems to have spoken and written as though his own authority given him by God was all-sufficient^ as he says in the second chapter of his epistle to the Romans, " God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christy according to my gospel/' He also makes a remarkable declaration in waiting to the Galatians, that he had withstood Peter to the face, because he was to be blamed. In this latter case, the perfect independence and equality is most clearly and unmistakeably shown : in fact, more than equality, — supremacy also over that portion of the church which he is addressing in this Epistle, and also over the Gentile church at Antioch and in all the world. We must not forget that Paul not only rebukes Peter publicly, but thinks it proper, as an inspired waiter guided by the Holy Spirit, to record the fact for all the Church of his own time and of after ages also, to know that Peter was in the wrong, and that he submitted to an open and merited rebuke. This record is not to be treated as a matter of no importance, or as the result of a fit of bad temper, as some who desire to elevate Peter would consider it, and therefore pretend to lament it, but as made for a special purpose, for otherwise, undoubtedly, he would have been satisfied with resisting Peter, and then letting the matter drop ; but the whole of the preceding part of the epistle is occupied by arguments proving his own independent authority, and showing that the other apostles did not deny nor in any way resist it. If Paul had thus proclaimed to his contemporaries, and handed down to posterity in this triumphant way, as some would assume, the fact that he had rebuked in public a superior, or even one of equal authority with himself over that particular portion of the Church which was interfered with, the thing (notwithstanding the remarks made in the note referring to this passage in the Douay Testament) would have looked, to say the least ot it, very bad, and there would have been good reason for the lamentations of those who judge and condemn the apostle's infirmity of temper ; but if he was of superior authority to Peter over the Gentile portion of the Church, the thing becomes easily understood, and strictly in accordance with pro- priety, while without doubt great must be the relief to those tender consciences who feel so bit- terly the apostle's failings. But the significance of this passage is brought more prominently before us when we consider that the object of this epistle is the rebuking the Galatians for a tendency to follow the teaching of the Judaising party, who had first tried to compel ST. PAULAS POSITION IN THE CHURCH. 63 the Gentiles to submit to the rite of circumcision, and keep the law of Moses, and who, after this question was set at rest by the apostles of the circumcision, still tried to the utmost to keep up the distinction between Jew and Gentile, and so to gain their object by a side wind, putting for- ward Peter, whether rightly or wrongly, as their head, he having given some occasion for their doing so. There is also another most remarkable evidence of the complete independence of St. Paul as an apostle and inspired teacher, yea, and of his su- premacy over the other apostles, which must not be passed over, more especially since the whole Christian Church seems in this case to have tacitly acknowledged it. In Acts XV. there is an account given of the holding of the first general council at Jerusalem, at which w^ere present Peter and James, and probably other apostles, besides Paul himself. It was then ordained, after much discussion, that the Gentiles should not be required to sub- mit to the rite of circumcision, but that they must abstain of necessity from meats ofifered to idols, and one or two other things. The words are very plain as they are contained in the twenty-third, twenty-eighth, and twenty -ninth verses : " The apostles and elders greeting unto the brethren which are of the Gentiles in Antioch, and Syria, and Cilicia. It seemed good unto the 64 ST. PAULAS POSITION IN THE CHURCH. Holy Ghost and to us to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things, that ye ab- stain from meats offered to idols/' &c., see also ActSj xxi. 25. Yet St. Paul did not hesitate to teach the Corinthians that so long as they ab- stained from giving offence to the weak consciences of their brethren they were at perfect liberty in this matter; his whole argument in the eighth chapter of his first epistle to them tends to this, that they would be neither the better nor the worse for eating or not eating, but that they mighty by sitting in the idoFs temple and partaking of the offerings, lead others to do so contrary to their weak consciences, and on this account they ought to abstain, though he does not directly command them to do so. In the tenth chapter he tells them to eat whatever is set before them, asking no questions for conscience sake; but if any one volunteers the information that the meat has been offered to idols, then they must not eat for conscience sake, — not their own, but that of their informant, — they must give none offence, to Jew or Gentile, but follow his example, for he pleased all men for their profit, and that they might be saved. As, therefore, I before concluded that the gospel preached by St. Paul was distinct and independent of the other twelve apostles, although in all respects agreeable with their teaching (for even in the last- named instance they seem to have consented to J ST. Paul's position in the church. 65 PauPs doctrine, or at least to have offered no opposition to it), and that it was ordained for a separate and distinct purpose; so now I am driven to the conclusion that he himself was also inde- pendent of the others, and his appointment entirely distinct, and that therefore, so far as that especial and distinct appointment went, he was not only the equal, but the superior of the other apostles : for if it ^'ere not the case that he was their su- perior, there would have been two distinct and differently appointed authorities, equal to and in- dependent of one another, over the same people and for the same object, from which arrangement confusion only must necessarily have arisen, but " God is not the author of confusion/' It, therefore, being clear that St. Paul did ac- tually possess this distinct and independent mis- sion and authority, we should, of course, expect to find that he openly and decidedly claimed it, and that the other apostles also acknowledged it. That he himself claimed it is evident from those things which have been already referred to ; for the whole of the beginning of his epistle to the Galatians seems to be a claim, on St. Paul's part, for this supremacy, as far, at least, as that church was concerned. But, as I have already gone over the subject, I need not repeat it in this place, but will merely remark that the object he seems to have had in giving an account of his own life and actions — more especially of his difference with St. Peter — was this^ that he desired to show that he had never hesitated to assert his own authority or supremacy before all the world when- ever he felt himself called upon to do so ; and, if we want another example of this assertion on his part, what more decided and remarkable case can w^e expect to find, than that of his openly teaching the doctrine of liberty as to the eating of meats that had been ofi'ered to idols, in direct contradic- tion to the decision of the apostles, given forth at the council already spoken of ? That the other apostles also acknowledged this claim, seems evident ; for he tells us himself, that when they saw that the gospel of the uncircum- cision was committed unto him — as that to the circumcision was unto Peter, they gave him the right hand of fellowship, that he and Barnabas should go unto the heathen, and they — namely, James, Peter, and John — unto the circumcision, only desiring them to remember the poor. Now here is a plain acknowledgment, on their part, which has never been contradicted, that PauPs mission was distinct from, and independent of, theirs. They gave the right hand of fellow- ship as to an equal ; but more even than this is here acknowledged, for it seems as though here were an acknowledgment of a certain supremacy or pre-eminence, possessed by Peter over his fellow-apostles, as far as the Jews were concerned ; andj whatever that was, or however far that ex- Q>7 tended, so far did they here confess that Paul possessed the same as to the uuch'cumcision ; " As to Peter the gospel of the ch'cumcision, so to me that of the uncircumcision/^ If, therefore, Peter possessed a supremacy, Paul possessed one in an equal degree ; the one as to the Jews, the other as to the Gentiles. This is, I imagine, indisput- able ; and this passage is undoubtedly worthy of much, and very careful, consideration. Peter, also, seems generally to have acted con- sistently with this decision of the three apostles, viz., himself, and James, and John. It is true, indeed, that he apparently interfered with the Gentiles at Antioch as to their observing the Jewish ceremonies ; for Paul says to him, " Why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?^^ But this, evidently, was by example only, and, indeed, could not have been by anv actual teaching; for we cannot suppose that he would teach a doctrine directly in opposition to his own practice ; for, up to the time of his merit- ing the rebuke from Paul, he had eaten with the Gentiles, and only withdrew and separated himself when certain persons arrived there who had been sent by James, by which conduct he set an ex- ample of dissimulation, which seems to have been followed by very many of the Jews. In this dispute between the two apostles, the Church seems, like Peter, to have acknowledged, tacitly at least, if in no other way, that Paul was 68 ST. PAULAS POSITION IN THE CHURCH. right, for it has never required of us who are Gentiles, that we should live as do the Jews, or, rather, as the Jewish Christians did in the times to which we are referring. That Peter and Paul treated one another gene- rally as though they considered each one that the authority of the other was independent, and his mission distinct, is further shown by the fact that, in their writings they seem very much (I may almost say as much as possible) to have addressed, each one exclusively, that particular class of per- sons to whom he was especially sent. I do not, however, wish to be understood as asserting that Peter never wrote for Gentiles, any more than that Paul never wrote for Jews, which latter would be at once disproved ; nor that Peter had no authority over the Gentile Church, nor Paul over the Jewish ; for the Church was event- ually to become one fold only : but that each one had a superior authority to the other over that portion of the Christian body to which he was especially sent, and interfered as little as possible with the other. I think, then, that there is internal evidence in St. Peter^s epistles, that they are addressed to Jews only; while there is also internal evidence in most of St. PauPs writings, and external where the other is wanting, that all those of his epistles M^hich were addressed to particular churches were written to Gentiles only. Those which he wrote ST. Paul's position i.n the church. 69 to individuals do not appear to me as in any way bearing- on the argument ; and the epistle to the Hebrews is alone — in part — opposed to the view 1 have taken. Some persons have, indeed, believed that this epistle was not written by St. Paul; but as I know no satisfactory reason for this supposi- tion, I will acknowledge at once that so far my argument is deficient. Notwithstanding this, it seems to me, that if I can show good grounds for assuming that the above statement regarding St. Peter's two epistles, and the first nine of St. Paul's, is correct, it will strongly confirm the idea, that Peter acknowledged Paul's superior authority over the Gentiles, w'hile Paul conceded to Peter the like position over the Jews. But this is a matter to which I shall devote a separate chapter, first observing — although I do not consider it necessary to my argument — that St. James directly addresses his epistle to the twelve tribes scattered abroad, and that St. Jude appears, by his expressions in the fourth and eighteenth verses, to assume that the times in which he lived w^ere the last times ; for he says, " There are cer- tain men crept in unawares, as it w^as foretold, there shall be mockers in the last times." That this appears to be an evidence that he was writing for Jews only, will be shown, in the next chapter, by my remarks on St. Peter's first epistle. 70 CHAPTER V. ST. PETER S EPISTLES, AND THE FIRST NINE OF ST. PAULAS, TO WHOM ADDRESSED. "James, Cephas, and John, gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship, that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision." — Gal. ii. 9. I HAVE assumed that St. Peter wrote his two epistles for the use of Jews only, while the first nine written by St. Paul were for the Gentiles ex- clusively, and the reasons for such an assumption are as follows : — Peter, when he speaks of Gentiles, invariably uses the third person, while he uses the first or second person, indiscriminately to all appearance, towards those whom he is addressing. Thus, in his first epistle, the second chapter, the twelfth verse, he says, ^^ Having your conversation honest among the Gentiles, that whereas they speak against you as evil-doers.^^ Again, in the fourth chapter, the third and fourth verses, " For the time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles, when we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, banquetings, and 4 EPISTLES OF ST. PETER AND ST. PAUL. 71 abominable idolatries, wherein they think it strange that ye run not with (or together) to the same excess of riot." It might, indeed, be supposed that because he here uses the words '^ abominable idolatries," he is speaking to converted Gentiles, and refers, when using the word Gentiles, to those who were yet unconverted ; but this is evidently not the case, because he speaks not of "you"butof^^us." He in- cludes himself amongst those who had walked in these evil courses, by which we are, I presume, to conclude that he means figurative, not actual, idolatries, — the love of this world rather than the love of God. Peter, also, in the seventh verse of the same chapter, tells his hearers " that the end of all things is at hand ; " but Paul, in 2 Thess. ii., cautions them not to permit themselves to be troubled by the notion that the day of the Lord is at hand, nor to be deceived. That Paul prophesied cor- rectly experience has shown us ; but we are not the less to believe that Peter also spoke truly ; yet to reconcile the two statements seems im- possible, unless we assume that the latter apostle was writing to Jews only, and referred to the destruction of Jerusalem, the Temple, the Jewish polity, and their very existence as one of the nations of the earth, yea, and the loss of that which St. Paul calls the chief advantage of the Jew, namely, the exclusive charge of the oracles of 72 EPISTLES OF ST. PETER AND ST. PAUL, God, which were henceforth to be committed unto the Gentiles, even more especially than to the Jews. In the second epistle the third chapter, Peter writes thus : " This second epistle, beloved, I now write unto you; in both which (Ji^ aJc, plural) I stir up your pure minds." Both these epistles are, therefore, addressed to the same persons. It is true, indeed, that they are called general or catholic epistles, but this signifies merely that they are not addressed to any particular church in one place; and the first verse shows this to be the case, because the epistle is there confined to " the strangers scattered through Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia,Asia,andBithynia.-'^ This word "stran- gers " seems to prove that Jews only are meant, because in Acts ii. the same expression is applied to those Roman Jews who came to the feast of Pentecost, and were present at the first public preaching of the Gospel. And the words " scat' tered abroad" also are significant of persons not resident in their own country, but foreigners ; and reminds one of the punishment which God threat- ened to send on the Jews for their sins, and which was actually at that very time in process of accomplishment. It is also the same expression as that which St. James applies to the twelve tribes in the first verse of his epistle. That Paul, on the other hand, wrote to Gentiles exclusively in his first nine epistles, seems evident. TO WHOM ADDRESSED. 73 In bis epistle to the Romans,, the first chapter, the thirteenth verse^ he desires fruit from them as from other Gentiles. In the eleventh chapter, the thirteenth verse, he says : " I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as I am the apostle to the Gentiles/^ And here observe that he claims an especial apostleship to a portion of that very church of which it is pretended Peter was the first bishop ; and that he twice over, namely, in the second and sixteenth chapters, alludes, in the most decisive manner, to his preaching, as being their rule of faith : " God shall judge the secrets of men according to my gospeV^ and ^' He is of power to establish you according to my gospel/^ In the second chapter he makes a short ad- dress to the Jew, beginning with, ^' Behold, thou art called a Jew ; '^ but this is evidently a paren- thesis addressed to an imaginary single individual of that nation for the purpose of making an ap- plication of certain doctrines for the better in- struction of his actual disciples. In his first epistle to the Corinthians, the twelfth chapter, the second verse, he says, ^^ Ye were Gentiles, carried away unto these dumb idols, even as ye were led/^ The second epistle was written to the same persons amongst the Cor- inthians as the first; this is proved by a comparison of the second chapter, the seventh and two fol- lowing verses, with the beginning of the fifth chapter of the first epistle ; and who those persons 74 EPISTLES OF ST. PETER AND ST. PAUL, were is also shown in the twenty-second verse of the eleventh chapter, wherein he repeats the same question three times over in different words, al- luding to some who he saw reason to believe were coming to try to pervert the Christians of Corinth, and who would boast that they were Hebrews in order to gain an influence over them, as being of the race which was looked upon by the Gentile Christians of those times with great reverence as the chosen people of God. In the first chapter of his epistle to the Gala- tians, he speaks of the Jews' religion as of some- thing held by a different people from those he was addressing. In the fifth chapter, the second verse, he declares that '4f they shall be circumcised Christ shall profit them nothing ; '^ this proves in two ways that he was writing to Gentiles only, because if they had been Jews they would have been circumcised by their parents in childhood, therefore it would have been useless to teach them now not to submit to that rite ; and, more- over, he did not teach the Jews not to circumcise their children, as is proved in the twenty-first chapter of the Acts, wherein we learn, that being in Jerusalem he went into the presence of James and the elders, who said to him, " Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe : and they are informed of thee, that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they 1 TO WHOM ADDRESSED. 75 ought not to circumcise their children, neither to walk after the customs. What is it therefore ? the multitude must needs come together : for they will hear that thou art come. Do therefore this that we say unto thee : We have four men which have a vow on them ; take them, and purify thyself with them, and all may know that those things whereof they are informed of thee, are nothing : " which things Paul did. We can- not suppose that James and the elders would have advised, or Paul have consented to, an act of gross dissimulation, which this would have been if the charges brought against him were true. In the second chapter of his epistle to the Ephesians, he writes thus : " Ye being in time past Gentiles, called Un circumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made with hands, were aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world; ^' and in the third chapter he calls himself, '' I, Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles; ^' and he also speaks of the dispensation of the grace of God, given him by revelation for them, even the mystery that the Gentiles should be fellow-heirs, to which mystery he refers, both in Romans xvi. and in Colossians i., in language remarkably similar. In the epistle to the Philippians I find no internal evidence, either one way or the other; 76 EPISTLES or ST. PETER AND ST. PAUL. but if we turn to the account given in Acts xvi. of his visit to Philippic we shall find, I think, strong reason to believe that he preached when there chiefly, if not entirely, to Gentiles. It is first said that on the Sabbath-day he went to the river- side, where prayer was wont to be made. This practice of offering up prayers on the river-banks was, I believe, entirely heathen, and not Jewish ; and though the Sabbath was the day chosen, there is nothing to show that this was done on account of the people, but probably for PauFs own convenience. Then, though Lydia was a worshipper of God, yet it does not follow that she was either a Jew^ess or a proselyte, for there were many sincere worshippers of the true God, who were Gentiles by birth, and had never become proselytes. But a stronger evidence is found in the expression used by the masters of the heathen girl, out of whom the spirit of divination was cast. They took Paul and his companions before the magistrates, saying, ^' These men, being Jews, teach customs which are not lawful for us Romans to receive." Now, though Paul afterwards declares himself to be a Roman, yet he was one in a totally different sense from the others. He enjoyed the privileges of citizenship, but was not by that cir- cumstance forbidden to worship other than the Latin and Greek gods ; but these men acknow- ledged that their citizenship was of such a nature, that they were subject to the Roman laws on re- TO "WHOM ADDRESSED. 11 ligiorij — they, in fact, were heathens of the same faith as the Roman people professed. There is also further evidence found in the fifteenth chapter of the epistle to the Romans to the same effect ; for in speaking of the collections for the poor saints at Jerusalem, which were made by them of Macedonia and Achaia, of the former of which countries Philippi was a chief city, St. Paul uses these words: ^^It hath pleased them [to make a contribution], and their debtors they are ; for if the Gentiles have been made par- takers of their spiritual things, their duty is also to minister unto them in carnal things. ^^ In the secondchapter of Colossians, thethirteenth verse, St. Paul says, '^You, being dead in your sins and the un circumcision of your flesh, hath he quickened.^' In the fourth chapter, the tenth and following verses^ he speaks of Aristarchus, Marcus, and Justus, "who are of the circumcision," and " Epaphras, who is one of you,-*^ which is as much as to say, you are not of the circumcision. And in the latter part of the first chapter he speaks of the dispensation of God given him for them, the mystery hidden from ages, and now revealed to the saints, to whom God makes known the riches of "this mystery among the Gentiles;" which words, and the application of them, are made more clear by a reference to the third chapter of the epistle to the Ephesians. 78 EPISTLES OF ST, PETER AND ST. PAUL, In the first chapter to the Thessalonians, the Apostle reminds them that they " turned to God from idols to serve the living and true God/^ In the second chapter he says^ '' Ye became follovv^ers of the churches of Judea, for ye have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they of the Jews, who both killed the Lord Jesus and their own prophets, and have persecuted us, for- bidding us to speak to the Gentiles ; ^' by which words he draws a comparison between those to whom he is writing, together with their country- men, and the churches in Judea, together with the Jews. The second Epistle to the Thessalonians was, no doubt, written to the same class of persons amongst them as the first ; but besides this, there appears to be some evidence within it, namely, in the second chapter, that it w^as addressed to the Gentiles, because therein he cautions them not to permit themselves to be deceived or led away, to imagine that *' the day of Christ was at hand." On the apparent contradiction, but real con- sistency, of these words, with those of St. Peter, in the fourth chapter of his first epistle, I have already remarked and shown how this is a strong evidence that the one Apostle wrote for Gentiles and the other for Jews ; I therefore need not repeat it in this place. It seems to me that I have now shown that TO WHOM ADDRESSED. 79 there is very strong reason to believe that St. Paul interfered but little with St. Peter's mis- sion to them of the circumcision, and that Peter, on the otber hand, interfered very little with PauFs especial mission to the Gentiles ; but it was of necessity both impossible and improper to keep up the distinction entirely, because our Lord himself declared that he intended to make one fold only under one shepherd : and St. Paul said, that itwas God^s intention to do away with the difiPerence between the Jews and Gentiles. In the second and third chapters of his epistle to the Ephesians, he argues to the following pur- port : ^^ Remember that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, are now made nigh by the blood of Christ, who hath broken down the middle wall of partition, having abolished the enmity, in order to make in himself of twain one new man making- peace. Now, therefore, ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellow-citizens with the saints and of the household of God, who hath revealed to me the mystery that the Gentiles should be fellow-heirs and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in the Gospel.^' But this union of the two bodies into one was to be of necessity a work of time, in consequence of the excessively strong and very natural prejudices of the Jews. It certainly was not accomplished in the time of 80 EPISTLES OF ST. PETER AND ST. PAUL, ETC. the Apostles, who kept up the distinction by authorising, if not commanding, the circumcision of the Jews^ while they released the Gentiles from that yoke of bondage, for they, to all appearance, never became so advanced in the knowledge of this mystery as St. Paul himself was. 81 CHAPTER VI. ST. PAUL S AVRITINGS VOLUMINOUS ; HE MOXOPO- LISES ALL ATTENTION AFTER HE IS INTRODUCED ON THE SCENE. * ' In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to my Gospel." — Rom. ii. 16. Closely connected with the subject which has occupied the two last chapters, are one or two circumstances which are certainly remarkable, and appear deserving of consideration. The first of these is the voluminousness of the doctrinal writings of St. Paul in comparison with those of the other apostles; for while all the twelve apostles have together left behind them only seven epistles and the book of Revelations, St. Paul has left fourteen epistles, which contain very much more than twice as much matter as the whole of the others. I exclude from this calculation the four gospels, one of which, with the Acts, was written by St. Luke, who was not an apostle, because they are only narratives of the events which hap- pened during the lifetime of our Lord on earth, G 83 and the words which were uttered by him and those with whom he conversed^ but contain no original matters of doctrine from the mouths of the writers themselves. It cannot^ I imagine, be supposed that this can be accounted for by the circumstance that the twelve, including Matthias, were illiterate men, because half their number showed their capability by writing gospels and a few epistles; and to write those things which they spent their lives in preaching would not seem an excessively difficult matter, more especially seeing that these men were divinely inspired. It seems to me that probably the primary cause is to be found in this, — that as they chiefly ad- dressed themselves to Jews, they would not find it necessary to travel so constantly from place to place as St. Paul did, who founded the churches of the Gentiles; and in consequence of this and of their number, they were not separated for such long periods from the congregations under their charge, nor did they find it so difficult on any sudden emergency to visit any one church out of its due course. Now, if this appears a reasonable supposition, it becomes confirmatory of that which I have before said regarding the distinct missions of Paul and the other apostles, and of their prac- tice of preaching to diff'erent sections of the Church almost exclusively. But there is also, I think, another and an especial reason for this circumstance, because it does not stand by itself. 83 for there is another fact which appears to be intimately connected with it. It not only happens that PauFs doctrinal writings are more than twice as copious as those of all the other apostles to- gether; but it also happens that after his intro- duction, in Acts, ix., wherein his conversion is related, the whole of that book, except three chapters, is entirely monopolised by a history of his doings; and of those three chapters, two are taken up with the account of the baptism of Cornelius, the first uncircumcised Gentile admitted to that sacred rite ; and with Peter's description of it in the presence of the other apostles, and his reasons for administering it ; so that, in fact, after the first eight chapters, nineteen out of the re- maining twenty are devoted to Paul and the Gen- tiles. These two circumstances taken together, evi- dently possess a signification of some importance, and should not be passed over unnoticed. It seems as though the object of the Almighty was this — and I speak with a good deal of confidence in saying it — namely, to bring down his divine revelations to the admission of the Gentiles into the covenant of promise, and to the establishment of the apostle to the Gentiles in his high office and supreme authority ; in fact, to the revelation of that mystery which had been hidden from ages, that the Gentiles should be fellow-heirs and of 84 ST. one body, and partakers of God^s promise in the Gospel, and of whicli Paul was the minister, and then to treat his great work, to which all things, up to that period, had been co-operating, as fully accomplished. Agreeably with this view of the case, it appears also as though there was a reason why God should think fit to ordain that only a comparatively small amount of the writings of the twelve should exist, and so many of St. PauPs, assuming, as I have done, that the former wrote for the circumcision only, namely, that the Jewish Christian churches being intended to exist for so short a period only, might be left more properly to depend upon oral tradition than the Gentile churches, which were to exist for ages ; in fact, to the end of the world ; and it is plain that so long as the apostles or their immediate successors should be yet alive, so long the Christian churches in those parts of the world where the Gospel took its rise and the apostles chiefly lived, would naturally rely very much on unwritten tradition, however unsafe it may be to do so now ; and they, moreover, had the advantage of St. John^s direct instruction, even to the time of the destruction of Jerusalem and the dispersion of the Jewish nation. If this proposition be accepted, may it not fur- ther be supposed that this trusting to oral tradi- tion might actually have had the effect of bringing 85 about the purposes of the Almighty, and causing, or helping to cause, the Jewish Christian churches to fall into heresies, and gradually sink away and disappear through the want of some sufficient and incorruptible rule of faith by which to preserve the truth from corruption ? 86 CHAPTER VII. THE SACRAMENT OF THE LORD^S SUPPER COMPARED WITH THE PASSOVER. ** Christ our Passover is sacrificed for us." — 1 Cor. v. 7. We took under our consideration in the third chapter certain matters connected with one of the Holy SacramentS; namely, Baptism ; I would now make a few observations on the other, the Lord^s Supper. The sacrament of Baptism is, in many respects, very similar to, and apparently a Christian con- tinuance of, the ordinance of circumcision; and like it, is administered to the same individual only once in his lifetime. In like manner, the Sacrament of the Lord^s Supper has many points of similitude with, and seems to be a kind of continuance of, or successor to, the sacrifice of the Passover, and like it is celebrated over and over again by the worshipper ; but it differs therefrom partly in this, that the one is comme- morative and the other prophetic, and partly in certain points which seem to me of great impor- THE SACRAMENT OF THE LORD^S SUPPER. 87 tance and exceedingly interesting, and whicli I would now shortly consider. St. Paul says, " Christ our Passover is sacrificed for us, therefore let us keep the feast ; not with the old leaven, nor with the leaven of malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sin- cerity and truth j^^ in which words he alludes manifestly to the feast of unleavened bread, which began at the time when the Paschal lamb was killed. Every Scripture reader knows that our Lord was called the Lamb of God, slain before the foun- dation of the world, and that the sacrifices ordained in the Mosaic law were emblems of the offering up of the Lord Jesus on the cross, for our sins ; every one also probably knows that the Passover was especially and conspicuously the emblem of our Lord^s crucifixion, which took place on the morning following his own partaking of it with his disciples : his seizure having been eff*ected on that night, within a few hours after the supper. That the whole of this sacrament of the Lord's Supper is emblematic will not, I imagine, be doubted, even by those who believe in the doctrine of transubstantiation, any more than that the Pass- over was an emblem of the crucifixion ; and as the Jews were commanded to eat the flesh of the lamb, to signify their receiving in themselves the blessings and benefits obtained through the sacri- fice, namely, the security from the visit of the destroying angel, so we are commanded to eat figuratively the flesh of our Lord Jesus Christ, that is, the bread which is the emblem thereof, to signify that we receive in ourselves the blessings purchased by his death. The manner and order of time in which this holy sacrament was ordained seems to be as fol- lows : Our blessed Lord, while partaking of the Paschal supper with the twelve, all of whom were present (Matt. xxvi. 20, and 25. Mark, xiv. 17, 18, 20, 23. Luke, xxii. 14) took bread, and brake it, and gave it to them, saying, "This is my body, which is given for you ; '^ and he took the cup after supper (1 Cor. xi. 25), and gave it to them all, saying, " This is my blood of the New Testa- ment,^^ or, " This cup is the New Testament in my blood." In reference to the bread, both Luke and Paul tell us that he said, " Do this in re- membrance of me;" and of the cup the apostle alone tells us that he said, " This do ye as oft as ye drink it in remembrance of me." During the time that they were at supper, but before the ordinance of the sacrament, our Lord told his disciples (Matt. xxvi. 21. Mark, xiv. 18) that one of those present and eating with him should betray him ; they, wishing to know who it was, asked him, one by one, "Is it I?" his answer was, " It is one of the twelve that dippeth with me in the dish." Then Judas asked him, "Mas- ter, is it I?" He said unto him, "Thou hast COMPARED WITH THE PASSOVER. 89 said.''^ AVbile they were yet eating our Lord administered and ordained the Holy Sacrament, as ah-eady rehited; and when supper was over (John, xiii.), he rose up from table, and washed his disciples^ feet, and then sat down again; im- mediately after which he again said to them, ^^One of you shall betray me.'' This time Simon Peter beckoned to John to ask who it was of whom he spake, — it having escaped their observation, as it seems to have done a second time, that he had already pointed out the individual, when he told Judas himself. Our Lord answered to John, " He it is to whom I shall give the sop when I have dipped it.^'"' This sop he gave to Judas Iscariot, and then said to him, " That thou doest do quickly/' The disciples generally seem to have been ignorant of the manner in which the betrayer was pointed out, and even John must have taken but little notice of it, or probably he did not actually see the sop given, for no man at the table knew for what intent our Lord spake thus unto Judas; but some thought that he had given directions about the feast of unleavened bread, which w^as to continue for several days. Immediately after this our Lord rebuked Peter for boasting, saying unto him, " The cock shall not crow twice till thou hast denied me thrice." (John, xiii. 38. Matt. xxvi. 34. Mark, xiv. 30. Luke, xxii. 34.) The exact order in which these events occurred I 90 THE SACRAMENT OF THE LORD^S SUPPER consider to be a matter of some importance, and I would request tlie reader to pay especial atten- tion to it, and by comparing it with the verses to which I have made reference satisfy himself how far I am correct. I am aware that some persons have supposed that the washing of the disciples^ feet took place after some supper which preceded the Paschal feast, because of the words in the first, second, and fourth verses of the thirteenth chapter of St. John^s gospel, by whom alone this circum- stance is related. " Now before the feast of the Passover, when Jesus knew that his hour was come," and '^supper being ended, he riseth from supper, and took a towel;" but this supposition appears irreconcileable with the actual account given, for the supper spoken of in the second verse is brought forward as a thing already men- tioned and known to the reader, whereas no sup- per has been spoken of before but that of the Passover. In the next place, it was while they were yet assembled, though apparently not still in the house, that Peter was told that the cock should not crow till he had thrice denied our Lord ; and the narrative is continuous, and without any break, till the end. Others have supposed that this was really the Paschal Supper, but that the words dn'THju ysvofxsvov, in the second verse, signify that it was ready on COMPARED WITH THE PASSOVER. 91 the table, and not finished, nor even begun, so that the events mentioned in the first twelve verses took place before supper ; but here again difficulties meet us in the face. In the Doaay Testament the interpretation is the same as in our version, namely, that supper was finished. This fact is a strong testimony to the correctness of the translation. Mr. Scott, who is the author of this supposition, goes on to assume that, as Judas went immediately out after receiving the sop, he probably was not present at the ordinance of the sacrament. By this he destroys whatever force there may be in his argument, for Judas was decidedly present at the Paschal supper, as is proved in many places, but especially in the seventeenth and eighteenth verses of the four- teenth of St. Mark, during which supper the sacrament was instituted. According to both the above suppositions, it is necessary to assume that that which occurred be- fore the feast is not told us till the fourth verse, — "He riseth from supper j^^ whereas the ante- cedent is in the first verse, viz., the words " know- ing^^ and "having loved,'^ the substantive " Jesus^"* being the nominative of the verb "loved;" for it must be observed that the literal translation is not, " When Jesus knew," but, " Jesus knowing that he must depart, having loved his own, loved them to the end;" and the word "he" used as 92 THE SACRAMENT OF THE LORd's SUPPER the nominative in the English versions is not found in the Greek. I suppose, then, that the first verse should be read as follows : — " Jesus knowing before the feast day of the Passover that his hour was come that he should go out of the world to the Father, hav- ing loved his own which were in the world, loved them to the end/^ And I assume the meaning to be this, that though he never gave any intima- tion to his disciples, till the last supper, of the time of his departure, he himself knew it some short time previously ; not indeed from the beginning, for his knowledge was not unlimited ; as he con- fessed, "Of that day and hour,^^ when certain things which he foretold were to be accomplished f "knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father ;^^ and that his knowledge of the time when, and the per- son by whose treason he should suffer, did not, as might have been expected, considering that the traitor was one of the twelve chosen disciples, interfere with or interrupt that love which he had felt towards them from the beginning. Having settled, as well as we are able, the order of time, and the manner in which these events occurred, let us return to the consideration of the connexion between the Passover and the sacrament of the Lord's Supper. It beino; remembered that the sacrifices of ani- COMPARED WITH THE PASSOVER. 93 mals, under the Mosaic law, were emblems of our Lord's death, the first thing I would notice is that the Jews were commanded to eat the flesh of the Paschal lamb, but on no account to partake of the blood of it, or of any other animal ; and this restriction was insisted upon repeatedly, and very forcibly. Thus, in Deuteronomy, the twelfth chap- ter, — ^^ Only be sure that thou eat not the blood : for the blood is the life; and thou mayest not eat the life with the flesh. Thou shalt not eat it ; thou shalt pour it on the earth as water. Thou shalt not eat it ; that it may go well with thee, and with thy children after thee/^ And in the seventeenth chapter of Leviticus, the tenth and following verses, — " Whatsoever man there be of the house of Israel, or of the strangers that so- journ among you, that eateth any manner of blood, I will even set my face against that soul that eateth blood, and I will cat him ofi" from among his people. For the life of the flesh is in the blood; and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls : for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul. Therefore I said unto the children of Israel, No soul of you shall eat blood, neither shall any stranger that sojourneth among you eat blood. And whatsoever man there be of the children of Israel, or of the strangers that sojourn among you, which hunteth and catcheth any beast or fowl that may be eaten ; he shall even pour out 94 the blood thereof, and cover it with dust. For it is the Hfe of all flesh ; the blood of it is for the life thereof : therefore I said unto the children of Israel, Ye shall eat the blood of no manner of flesh : for the life of all flesh is the blood thereof: whosoever eateth it shall be cut ofi"/^ The reason stated in this very forcible quotation, which I have purposely given in full, is that the blood is the life, and that it is given to make an atonement for the soul. " Therefore no soul of you shall eat blood.^^ But in the holy sacrament of the Lord^s Supper it is remarkable that he not only gave his blood, as he by a figure calls the wine, to be drank, but said " Drink ye all of it.^^ Now assuredly there must be some important matter signified in this remarkable difi'erence : more especially since so much is said in Holy Scripture regarding the efficacy of the blood of Christ. May it not be considered that God desired to show that the blood of bulls and of goats had no efficacy ? that the law could not give life ? as St. Paul saith, in Galatians, third chap- ter, that blood was given, but not that of animals, to make an atonement for the soul ; and, therefore, that the Jew possessing in the law only the out- ward shadow and form, and not the real enliven- ing power, was not to be entitled thereby to life, and an atonement, which could only be obtained through a better sacrifice. " For the law, having a shadow of good things to come, and not the very COMPARED AVITU THE PASSOVER. 95 image of the things, can never, by those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually, make the comers thereunto perfect, for then would they not have ceased to be offered, because that the worshippers once purged should have had no more conscience of sins? but in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year. For it is not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.''"' The Jews, then, received only the dead body, — the form and image, — but the blood, which is the life, and the atonement for the soul, they received not, but were compelled to pour it on the earth as water; and even when, at the first Passover, they sprinkled it on the door-posts of their houses, they neither partook of it, as the Christian par- takes of the emblem of our Lord^s blood, nor did they receive from it directly anything more than an earthly benefit ; in short, the real and essential part was by the law withheld from them. Now contrast all this with the privileges en- joyed by the Christian. As, through the blood of our Lord shed on the cross for our sins, we actually and indeed receive the blessing of spirit- ual life, and an atonement is effectually made for our souls, so we are privileged to receive not only the emblem of the corporeal or visible form, but the emblem also of the blood, which is the life : so that, indeed, everything is granted unto us, — nothing is withheld. " He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how shall he not with him also freely give us all things?'^ The next thing I would remark is, that our Lord, instituting this sacrament, administered the bread and the wine as two distinct and separate things : first, the bread, during supper, as they were eating, then the cup, after supper, and spoke of each as being or signifying a separate thing, namely, the one, the body ; the other, the blood. We must not forget that, as the sacraments are both emblematic, they must be treated as emblems throughout; and here, evidently, independently of the signification of the word 2w/>t,a, which means a dead corpse, is figured, not the living, but the dead body of the Lord ; for when the blood is se- parated from the body, the man must be dead, and it is by the death of Jesus Christ that we are redeemed. We then gain the blessing by the death of him whom we have not slain. We neither did actually bear, nor, by the emblem do we now take, on our shoulders, the burden of the murder of our Lord. For us, indeed, he was slain, and that alone is guilt enough. Yet we may truly say our hands are not stained with his blood ; guilty though we be, we are not guilty of his murder ; and we will not step out of our way to volunteer an acknow- ledgment — in receiving spiritually his fiesh and blood — that we did kill, and are now kilHng COMPARED WITH THE PASSOVER. 97 over and over again^ our living Lord; that we are ourselves sacrificing him a hundredth time. If it were intended by this sacrament to show us partakers in his betrayal and murder, as it is intended to prove our share in the blessings ob- tained by his death, there would not, I conceive, have been the care taken to give an emblem which signifies so difiPerent a thing; and it seems to me that the Church of Rome acts quite consistently with herself, in treating the wine as an unneces- sary thing for the majority of the communicants, that is, for all except the priests, because she teaches that the living Christ is sacrificed over and over again in the celebration of this sacrament, that the flesh and the blood are not separated. In the Douay Testament there is a note ap- pended to 1 Cor. xi. 27, wherein it is said, '^ Er- roneous translators/^ — evidently meaning those who prepared our version — ^^ corrupted the text by putting ' and drink ' contrary to the original n irirfi, instead of ' or drink. ^ '^ It would be amus- ing, if the thing were not too important and sacred for a matter of amusement^ to notice the spiteful manner in which this attack is w^orded; while, at the same time^ the correct translation tells even more strongly against the Eomish doctrine than the erroneous one; for the words " eat ^^ and " drink '^ are used no less than five times in four consecutive verses, and in all but one the conjunc- tion between them is "and.'' This is remarkable, H and seems to imply that the exception has some particular meaning, as though it was intended to signify that, in order to show the Lord^s death, it is necessary to eat the bread and drink the wine, that is, to do both ; but that it is possible to eat or drink unworthily, without doing both in an un- worthy manner — as in the case of a person com- mencing the Lord's Supper in the ancient man- ner, as a supper, in a proper spirit, taking the bread worthily, but finishing, through the tempta- tion of his company, by taking the wine to excess, and so vitiating the first part, and becoming guilty of the body as well as the blood of our Lord. Amongst those present at the first institution and celebration of this holy rite, was Judas Isca- riot, the betrayer, who also received it in company with the other eleven disciples. After our Lord had administered the bread and the wine, and had also washed his disciples^ feet, he, as I before ob- served, uttered a second time the declaration that one of those present should betray him ; and, in answer to the inquiry of John gave a sign by which the individual might be known : '^ He it is to whom I shall give a sop when I have dipped it.'' And here is a further evidence that this, at least, took place after the Paschal supper. John was aware, though none of the others probably were, what the sign was. He seems not to have seen COMPARED WITH THE PASSOVER. 99 the sop given, and they who saw it did not know that it was the sign, because, when Judas went immediately out, no man at the table knew why he went, or why our Lord said to him, " Do quickly what thou doest/^ They must have com- pared notes afterwards ; and, on so interesting a subject, they would have done this as soon as they had an opportunity; and, if the sop had been given a day or two before the Last Supper, they would then have known the traitor, and would not have asked one by one, " Is it I ? '^ More- over, they would hardly have consorted with him when they knew his true character ; but the fact is, he went immediately out, and it was night, and they never saw him again till his treason was com- pleted by the betrayal. I would now inquire what the sop was, on re- ceiving which, it is said, " the Devil entered into him ; " and again, " he having received the sop went immediately out/^ In the Douay Testament it is translated "bread dipped; ^■' but into what was the bread dipped or sopped, and what is the meaning of the sign? for a signification it as- suredly has. Our Lord did not give signs at random, but his conversation was full of expres- sive emblems. Was the bread dipped into the dish from which they had been eating, or into the cup from which they had been drinking ? Certainly not the dish, because it had contained the Paschal lamb, about 100 THE SACRAMENT OF THE LORD^S SUPPER which the ordinance was, that nothing was to be left till morning, but if there should be un- avoidably any portion left, it was to be burned. I may, therefore, fairly assume, that as our Lord and his disciples were poor in this world^s goods, and, moreover, that they were thirteen in number, and hearty men, nothing would be left; but whether this were so or not, there is another more decisive reason — namely, as follows. The law was so strict against the eating of blood, and the Jews were so particular in obeying this rule, that their custom was, and still is, to drain the meat so completely on all occasions, whether re- ligious or otherwise, lest a drop of blood should by any chance be left in it, that it came, and now comes, to their tables in a very dry state — in fact, there is no gravy, nothing in which to sop bread. This fact is conclusive as a proof that the bread was not dipped into the dish. The only other vessel in which the bread could have been dipped, I assume to have been the cup, which had shortly before been used in the administration of the wine of the sacrament, and which contained, no doubt, some of that which we should now consider the consecrated wine — that is to say, according to the emblems which I have already shown to be set visibly before us in this holy sacrament, the bread and the wine were mingled for Judas Is- cariot — the flesh and the blood were united — the man Christ Jesus was ahve, Judas swallowed the 1 COMPARED WITH THE PASSOVER. 101 emblem of tlie living Christ, and stood forth to those who will examine the type, in his true charac- ter of the actual murderer of the Lord. No wonder it is said, "After the sop Satan entered into him." The Romish Church — undoubtedly without in- tending it — confirms this idea; for — teaching that the bread becomes Christ, whole and entire, the living man, possessed of body, blood, soul, and divinity; and that therefore the wine is to be considered almost a superfluity, because, in a living man, the blood is not separated from the flesh — it ordains that the officiating priest, who thus (as it declares) ojffers up Christ again and again for the sins of the world, shall, as a part of the ceremony of the mass, break the bread, and put a particle of it into the cup before he partakes of either himself, saying, " May this mixture to- gether and consecration of the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ, be to us who receive it, or assist thereat, effectual to eternal life;''' so that that Church does consider that the mixture of the bread and the wine is necessary to the due cele- bration of this holy sacrament, for him who offers up Christ, according to the notion that the thing shown forth to the worshipper is the living man Christ Jesus, and not his dead body. There are many members of our Church who are ignorant that the cup is never administered by the Romish priest to the laity, but that he drinks of it himself, according to the ordinance of his 102 THE SACRAMENT OF THE LORD^S SUPPER. Church. This cup, of which he partakes, and which he most carefully drains, lest any, even the smallest portion, should be wasted of that which he believes to be changed into the real blood of Christ, contains the small particle of bread sopped in it, which he believes to be the actual body of Christ; so that he swallows the sop, and, by so doing, sacrifices — that is, kills, by his own act and deed, according to his own belief and the teaching of his Church — the man Christ Jesus, and, without intending it, closely copies the act of Judas the betrayer. 103 CHAPTER VIII. THE REFUSAL OF THE CUP TO THE LAITY^ AND AN INQUIRY AS TO THE TIME WHEN THE APOSTLES RECEIVED THEIR ORDINATION. *' In vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men." — Mark, vii. 7, 8. The Church of Rome refuses the cup to the lay people, and has, I believe, been always very de- cided on this point. It seems as though she dare not give way, lest the administration of the bread and wine as two separate things should open the eyes of her adherents to the fact, that the notion of our Lord^s living body being actually shown forth in this sacrament is a false one, and so weaken their belief in the power of the priest to bring down Jesus Christ from above substantially, before the eyes of the worshippers. But no good reason can be given, why our Lord's commandment should be disobeyed by ad- ministering, not the sacrament which he ordained, but a mutilated substitute invented by man. The argument put forth by the Church of Rome 104 THE REFUSAL OF THE CUP TO THE LAITY. for doing so, is as follows. The bread being changed into Jesus Christ, whole and entire, con- taining not only the body, but the blood also, with the soul and divinity, the wine becomes un- necessary ; and, though he not only instituted the sacrament in both kinds, but actually said to his disciples, in reference to the cup, "Drink ye all of itj^^ yet this does not prove more than that the priests alone were to receive the latter, for all who were then present were priests. But even if we grant that the twelve were all priests, we might inquire why that should be necessary for them which was unnecessary for others, seeing that there is nothing to indicate that our Lord in- tended to make this difference between them, or, indeed, any difference between the administration of the bread and the wine. But why are we required to grant that the twelve were priests ? what evidence is there of this ? and when did they receive their ordination? Was it when our Lord sent them to preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand ? I believe the Church of Rome itself does not assert this, for there was nothing priestly in this appointment, inasmuch as they were authorized only to preach the near approach of the kingdom of God (]\Iatt. X. 7), and heal the sick, which authority the seventy equally received. (Luke, x. 9.) Was it when our Lord said to them, as de- scribed in the eighteenth chapter of St. Matthew, THE REFUSAL OF THE CUP TO THE LAITY. 105 ''Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven -.'' or when he said these words to Peter alone, accompanied with the promise, " I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven ? " In both these cases we must not forget to observe the marked differ- ence in the tense, from that in the authority given to the apostles after our Lord^s resurrection, as related by St. John, in the twentieth chapter, the twenty-first to the twenty-third verses : " As ray Father hath sent me, even so send I you. Re- ceive ye the Holy Ghost; whosesoever sins ye re- mit, they are remitted unto them ; whosesoever ye retain, they are retained."" The former promises are expressed in the future tense, the latter in the present. But the Church of Rome holds that, in insti- tuting the sacrament of the Eucharist, our Lord gave to the apostles the office of the Christian priesthood. Let us, then, examine w^hat was ac- tually the privilege and what the command given to the apostles at this particular time. That our Lord commanded them to continue the celebration in after times, is gathered only from St. Luke^s gospel, chapter twenty -two, verse nineteen, and from St. PauFs First Epistle to the Corinthians, chapter eleven, verses tw^enty-four and twenty-five, in both which it is stated that, in giving the bread, he said, "This do in remem- 106 THE REFUSAL OF THE CUP TO THE LAITY. brance of me.'^ Now, it may be asked, what were they to do ? Was it not that which they had just been commanded to do — namely, to take the bread and eat it ? But the command regarding the wine is somewhat differently worded : " This do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me/^ Now the only way in which this can be interpreted to signify an authority to administer to others, must be by supposing that the thing which they were to do was that which our Lord had himself just done, in which case it becomes a command to administer to others the cup as often as they drank of it themselves, which, in that case, is very remarkable, as signifying of the cup that which is not so clearly shown of the bread — namely, that they were never to receive it them- selves without administering it, at the same time, to others — that is, of necessity, to those not authorised to administer, because, circumstanced as they were, they must often have been entirely separated from their brethren of the ministry. The real interpretation, no doubt, of the words ^' Do this,^^ is the same in the case both of the bread and of the wine, " Administer ; '' and, as- suming that which probably very few, if any, will deny, that an authority is here actually given to the apostles to administer this holy sacrament, still, to assert that this is an act of ordination, as the Church of Rome does, and an exclusive authority bestowed on them, and on such as they THE REFUSAL OF THE CUP TO THE LAITY. 107 should ordain to perform this religious service, seems to me unwarrantable. For, it may be asked, on what ground can it be argued that the autho- rity to administer one sacrament should make a man a Christian priest or presbyter, while the authority to administer the other did confessedly nothing of the sort ? — for, from the first, it has always been acknowledged that lay-baptism is valid, and we know that it was performed by unor- dained persons ; and, indeed, no pretence of ordi- nation has ever been set up, that I am aware of, for the apostles themselves, until the Lord^s Sup- per was instituted, though they baptized long before. The notion that the possession of the privilege of administering this sacrament constitutes a Christian priest, arises from the pretence that it is a sacrifice ofi'ered up for the sins of the people, which latter is just as gratuitous an assumption as the former, and is, in fact, arguing in a circle. The priest must have somewhat to offer, therefore the sacrament of the Lord^s Supper must be a sacrifice ; but a sacrifice can only be offered by a priest, therefore the authority to administer this sacrament makes a man a priest. Eut even if we suppose this sacrament to be truly a sacrifice, this would not necessarily distin- guish one man from another; for St. Peter calls his hearers, even the least advanced of them in religious knowledge, a priesthood. " Wherefore," 108 THE REFUSAL OF THE CUP TO THE LAITY. he says, in the second chapter of his First Epistle, " laying aside all malice, as new-born babes desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby ; ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God by Jesus Christ." It is, moreover, to be remembered, that the Paschal lamb — which was a true sacrifice, and, to all appearance, the most important of all those ordained to be offered by the Jews, and, at any rate, that most plainly and conspicuously typical of our blessed Lord^s death — was killed and offered, not by the priests, but by the heads of the families which partook of it ; and, indeed, the Jewish priests w^re not even appointed to their office till after the people had passed through the Red Sea and were in the wilderness. But I will go yet farther, and assert with con- fidence, that it was actually impossible that ordi- nation could have been granted to the apostles, or to any other persons, as ministers of the gospel, before our Lord was crucified, that is, before that thing was done which made the Gospel a fact accomplished. The redemption could not be preached before the work was done and the great price paid. It might only be foretold, as was done by the seventy and the twelve when sent out by our Lord, who preached, saying, " The king- dom of heaven is at hand/' — nay, our Lord him- I THE REFUSAL OF THE CUP TO THE LAITY. 109 self was a minister of the circumcision (Rom. xv. 8), and under the law, which was in full force until his death. St. Paul tells us, in the ninth chapter of the Epistle to the Hebrews, that "where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator, for a testament is of force after men are dead, otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth, whereupon neither the first [testament] was dedicated without blood.''^ Now every lawyer will tell us exactly the same thing, and will also teach us that a trustee is not in pos- session of his office, nor holds any power to act, nor, in fact, is he a trustee or executor, until that instrument is in force by which he is appointed. There can be no trustee or executor of a will and testament until the testator be dead, and the tes- tament in force. The apostles, therefore^ could not hold their office under the new testament^ or under the new dispensation, till the death of our Lord Jesus Christ. The thing was utterly impos- sible, but after his resurrection, there was no delay in the appointment, for he then said unto them, " As the Father hath sent me, even so send I you ; and when he had said this, he breathed on them, and saith unto them. Receive ye the Holy Ghost; whosesoever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them j whosesoever ye retain, they are retained. ^^ 110 CHAPTER IX. CONCLUSION. *• These (the spirit and the flesh) are contrary the one to the other." The Church of England holds the doctrine that Holy Scripture contains all things necessary to salvation, so that whatsoever is not read therein, nor may be proved thereby, is not to be considered as an article of the faith. This Article does not, of course, bind him who is not a member ; but we have a right to expect that our own fellow-church- men shall act and teach up to it. This being the case, it has often been a matter of astonishment that so many clergymen should hold opinions and teach them, which do not seem to be derived from, or capable of, proof by Holy Scripture alone. Thus, the opinions held and taught on the two sacraments — namely, as regards baptism, that re- generation always takes place in it, and then alone; and that to the baptized person only are God^s promises given; and, as regards the Lord's Sup- per, that there is some mysterious change, or, at least, some peculiar virtue imparted to the bread CONCLUSION. Ill and tlie wine, so that they become, in some unde- fined and unexplained way, different from what they were before, and are become so holy and sacred, that a kind of reverence is due to them, as testified by the anxious care that not a crumb shall fall to the ground, nor a single drop of the wine be left, seem to be totally unauthorised by the words of Holy Scripture. We must be particularly cautious of that ten- dency which has shown itself in man from the earliest times, that is, the tendency to materialise, — to convert every spiritual thing into something bodily, material, and tangible, — a tendency which is very natural, seeing that while we remain in this world, the animal nature preponderates, and " the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God, neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.'^ When Moses remained forty days in Mount Sinai, the Israelites, supposing that they had lost their visible leader, and not accepting Aaron in his place, would have gods to go before them, gods which were tangible and visible; and this they insisted on, even while the Divine presence was manifest to them on the top of the mountain. In the time of Samuel also, they expressed their dissatisfaction at the theocracy, under which it was their privilege to live, by demanding a visible king to reign over them and be their leader, though the Lord God was their king, the fact 112 CONCLUSION. being that a heavenly sovereign, whom they never saw, was not agreeable to their earthly nature. They also applied the prophecies, relating to our Lord Jesus Christ, to an earthly king, whom they expected to come and raise a miuhty and glorious monarchy over the nations of this world. The material temple was their rallying point ; the descent from Abraham, according to the flesh, their great glory and boast. After the same manner the Samaritans believed Mount Gerizzim to be the holiest of holy places, and that there alone ought worship to be paid to the Almighty ; but our Lord showed, by his words spoken to the woman at the well of Samaria, how opposed these notions were to a spiritual and true service : " Neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, shall ye worship the Father ; but the hour cometh and now is, when the true worship- pers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth, for the Father seeketh such to worship him ; God is a spirit, and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth." The whole history of idolatry is a history of the working of this propensit}^, first, to seek visible tangible objects of reverence as representatives of spiritual things, and then by degrees to treat those individual objects as though they were the spiritual things themselves. It was the indul- gence of this propensity which God forbade, saying, ^' Thou shalt not make to thyself any graven CONCLUSION. 113 image ; thou shalt not bow down to them ; " yet this tendency even now finds excuses and pre- tences under which it shelters itself, and all sorts of material things are made to be the receptacles of the reverence and worship of men, who, under the pretence of greater piety, divide and fritter away amongst innumerable sacred and pseudo- sacred things, the honour which is due in a con- centrated form to God alone. Thus even amongst some of the members of that pure and ApostoUcal branch of the Church Catholic, to which we have the privilege of be- longing, the spiritual nature of our holy religion is brought into subjection to earthly and material forms and substances, which, however sacred and binding on us, as some of them are, having been ordained by our Lord himself, cannot possess the power too commonly attributed to them. God's merciful promises are declared to be of no avail unless the Christian sacrament of Baptism be first administered by human hands ; and the gift of God, which cannot be purchased with money, may be purchased by a single compliance with one simple form, which is, in ninety-nine cases out of a hundred, attended to or neglected without the assent or dissent of the individual most interested. I say the gift of God is, as some teach, purchased by it, for this is, in fact, the doctrine taught by those who believe, that no promise from God is given to any person until this sacrament be ad- I 114 CONCLUSION. ministered j but that, instantly on his admission thereby into the visible Church, he is received actually as a child of God in such a sense, that if he is an infant and dies before committing actual sin, he will infallibly be taken up into heaven. St. Paul said of circumcision and uncircum- cision, they were nothing but the keeping the commandments of God; and this assertion may surely be applied to the two sacraments, more especially to Baptism, to which also his argu- ments in the end of the second chapter to the Romans seem pertinent : " If the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircuQicision be counted for circumcision ? and shall not uncircumcision, which is by nature, if it fulfil the law, judge thee, who by the letter and circumcision transgress the law ? For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly ; neither is that cir- cumcision, which is outward in the flesh : but he is a Jew, which is one inwardly ; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter ; whose praise is not of men, but of God.^^ The word of an honourable man is his bond, but the trust which we place in our fellow-crea- tures seems to be denied to God, whose promises are looked upon as of no value, unless the pledge also is taken to secure their fulfilment, by which course that material pledge, which he has merci- fully vouchsafed to our infirmities for the purpose of strengthening the weak faith, which is the CONCLUSION. 115 result of our material nature^ is converted into a hindrance and discouragement, distracting our attention, and causing us to turn aside from the contemplation of the truth and justice of our heavenly Father. As to the sacrament of the Lord^s Supper, which, like Baptism, is a simple and plain thing until it is mystified by human pretences ; in it men insist on a change in the bread and the wine, or else a real presence of our Lord^s body ; they think they must bring down Christ from above, and, like Naaman the Syrian, they are dissatisfied if the miracle be not performed according to their own ideas of what should be, and without it this sacrament is too spiritual a matter for them, and therefore is the less valued. Our Lord, speaking of the Spirit of truth, said, " The world cannot receive him because it seeth him not.^^ These two senses, if I may so call them, namely, the earthly sight and the spiritual faith, are directly opposite, the one to the other, for " hope that is seen is not hope ; for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for ? but if we hope for that we see not, then do we with patience wait for it." The consequence of this want of power to receive^ except they see, is that men must have something to look on; they care not what, whether it be the golden calves with nothing of the God visible in them, or whether it be some other like thing, and a visible mediator must stand 116 CONCLUSION. up to satisfy them and cry aloud: ^' These be thy gods, Israel, which brought thee out of the house of bondage/^ The sacrifices of the old law, and of the times of the Patriarchs, were forms of worship granted to man to satisfy this longing desire for material worship ; but they converted them to evil, and learned to believe in the sacrifice itself, instead of looking forward to something far better. It was in opposition to this that St. Paul taught that the blood of bulls and goats cannot take away sin. We can hardly understand now how men could have been so ignorant and superstitious ; but in this it seems as though we were sometimes at least like those persons who, remembering their own past follies, wonder at and despise them, while they are in the very act of committing others quite as bad. Our own Church has steered remarkably clear of these rocks and quicksands, and long, indeed, may she continue to do so. The many attempts to bring these difficulties upon us have hitherto, by God^s blessing, always raised up a determined and successful opposition ; and so long as Holy Scripture is placed in the van, and laid open before all men, the truth must in the long run triumph ; for although many will persist in read- ing with other people^s eyes, and understanding with other people^s minds, there will always be many also who will refuse to be so shackled. CONCLUSION. 117 whose reason will act, and who will not only think but proclaim their thoughts, by which others also wall be led to study, to their own lasting advantage and the overthrow of error. " All Scripture w^as given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for cor- rection, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works ! ■'' London : — Printed by G. Barclay, Castle St. Leicester Sq. April 1857. WiaxlxB ^xrLlisIjcb BY THOMAS HAT CHARD, 187 PICCADILLY, LONDON. ABERNETHY, Dr. J.— Memoirs of John Abernethy, F.R.S. "With a View of his Lectures, "Writings, and Character, and Documents relating to his Religious Views, &c. By George Macil- WAiN, F.R.C.S. Third Edition, with two Portraits. "Svo. cloth, IQs. 6d. " We reconuueud it as replete with interest and instruction." — Record. ALLNUTT, Rev. R. L. — A Course of Sermons on the Sixth Chapter of Isaiah, preached during Lent, 1845, at "Wicken Church. By Richaed Lea Allndtt, M.A., Vicar of Damerham, "Wilts. 12mo. cloth, gilt edges, 2s. 6d. [ ANDERSON, Rev. R.— A Practical Exposition of tlie Gospel of St. John. By the late Rev. Robebt Anderson, Perpetual Curate of Trinity Chapel, Brighton. 2 vols. 12mo. cloth, 14*. Ten Discourses on the Communion Office of the Church of England. With an Appendix. Second Edition. 12mo. cloth, 7s. ANLEY, Miss C. — Earlswood: a Tale for the Times. By Charlotte Anlet. Second Thousand. Fcap. cloth, 7s. 6d. "A pleasinfr and gi'acefiilly written tale, detailing the process by which persons of piety are somethnes perverted to Romisli error." — English Ecvicw. " This tale is singularlj' well conceived." — Evanijelical Magazine. "We can recommend it witli confidence." — Christian Times. Influence. A Moral Tale for Young People. Fourth Edition, fcap. cloth, 6s — Miriam ; or, the Power of Truth. A Jewish Tale. Tentli Edition, with a Portrait. Fcap. cloth, Gs. Works PuMished hjj BABINGTOI^, T. — A Practical View of Christian ; Education in its Early Stages. By Thomas Babington, Esq. Ninth j Edition. ]2mo. cloth, 55. j BACON, Eev. H. E.— Lectures for the Use of Sick j Persons. By the Rev. H. B. Bacon, M.A. Fcap. cloth, 4.?. M. j " TliG Lectivres possess two Teiy pa'eat vecommenclations. Fu-st,— they are brief, j coneise, and to the point ; and secondly,— the language is plam, free from ambiguity , I and scriptiu-al, &c. &c. It may he veiy piofitahly meditated npon hy the sick ; and | yonng elerjoTnen ^\'ill not lay it do>\Ti after penisal without havuig derived some instrac- I iiow:'— Christian G-uardian. i ■ BATHEE, Archdeacon. — Sermons, chiefly Practical, i i:;y the late Edwabb Bather, M. A., Archdeacon of Salop. Vols. I. and i III., 8vo. boards, each 8s. { Bible Stories, selected from the Old and New I Testament, familiarised for the Use of Children ; in Portions. By the j Author of " Questions on the Epistles," &c. Third Edition. 2 vols. 18mo. half-hound, each 2a'. (id. ! BIBDULPE, Sev. T. — The Yonng Churchman i Armed. A Catechism for Jimior Members of the Church of England. ; By the late Rev. TnEOpniLua Eiddulph, A.M., Mini ..r of St. ; Matthew's, Bristol. 18mo. cloth, Is. \ BIEB, Eev. C. S. — Romanism Unknown to Primitive ' Cliristianity. The substance of Lectures delivered in the Parish Church ! of Gainsborough. By the Rev. C. S. Bihd, M.A. F.L.S., Vicar, Canon of Lincoln, and late Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. Fcap. cl. 55. ; The Parahle of the Sower. Fo;ir Sermons ■ preached before the University cloth, 2*. Gd of Cambridge, in May, 1845. Fcap. For Ever ; and other Devotional Poems, particularly Hymns adapted to the Earlier Psalms. Second Edition. 32mo. silk, 2s. 6^. ] BLUNT, Eev. H. — Posthnmous Sermons. By the I late Rev. Henry Blvnt, T\I.A., Rector of Streatham, Surrey. Thii'd ! Edition, with a Portrait. 3 vols. 12mo. cloth, each 6s. j A Family Exposition of the Pentateuch. Fourth Edition. 3 vols. 12mo. cloth, each Gs. T. Hatchard, 187 Piccadilly. BLUNT, Rev. H. NIdg Lectures upon the History of Saint Peter. Nineteenth Edition. 12mo. cloth, 45. Gtf. Eiglit Lectures on the History of Jacob, Seventeenth Edition. 12mo. cloth, 4s. 6rf. Twelve Lectures on the History of Abraham. Thirteenth Edition. r2mo. cloth, 5s. 6rf. Lectures on the History of Saint Pan Eleventh Edition. 2 Parts. 12mo. cloth, each 55. &d. — Lectures on the History of onr Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. Tvv-elfth Edition. 3 Parts. 12mo. cloth, eacla 5s. Cid. — Discourses upon some of the Doctrinal Articles of the Church of England. Ninth Edition. 12mo. cloth, 05. ChI. — Sermons preached in Trinity Chm'ch, Chelsea. Seventli Edition. 12mo. cloth, Gs. — A Practical Exposition of the Epistles to the Seven Churches of Asia. Fifth Edition. 12mo. cloth, 5.s. Qd. — Lectures on the Llistory of Elisha. Eiitli Edition. 12rao. cloth, 55. GcZ. BE ABLE Y, Eev. C. — Sermons, preached chiefly at the Celebration of the Lord's Supper. By the Rev. Chahles Bkadlet, Vicar of Glashury, Brecknockshire. Third Edition. 8vo. cloth, 105. (Jd. Practical Sermons for every Sunday and Principal Holyday in the Year. Fourth Edition. Complete in 1 vol. 8vo. cloth, 12.^ Sermons preached in the Parish Chnrch of Glasbury, Brecknockshire, and St. James's Chapel, Clapham, Surrey. Ninth Edition. In 1 vol. 8vo. cloth, 105. Gc2. ' Sermons on some of the Trials, Duties, and Encouragements of the Christian Life. Second Edition. 8vo. cloth, 10s. CcZ. Works Published by BRADLEY, Eev. A. — Sermons chiefly on Character: preached at Hale, Surrey. By the Rev. Abthur Bradley, M.A., Perpetual Curate of Hale, and Michel Fellow of Queen's College, Oxford. Feap. cloth, 5s. BUETT, J. — Exempla Necessaria; or, Elementary- Latin Exercises on all the Parts of Speech, and the Substance of Syntax ; containing English Words and Sentences to be turned into Latin, Latin into English, and numerous Examination Questions to be entered on with the Accidence. With an Introduction. By J. Burtt, Teacher of Latin, &c. Third Edition, much enlarged. i8mo. cloth, 2s. M. CALCUTTA, Bishop of. — The Evidences of Christ- ianitj, in a Course of Lectures delivered in the Parish Church of St. Mary, Islington. By the Right Reverend Daniel Wilson, D.D., Bishop of Calcutta, and Metropolitan of India. Fourth Edition. 2 vols. 12mo. cloth, 9s. Sermons delivered in India. 8vo. cloth, 125. — The Divine Authority and Perpetual Obliga- tion of the Lord's Day asserted in Seven Sermons. Third Edition. 12mo. cloth, 3s. 6cf. Sermons on Various Subjects of Christian Doctrine and Practice. Sixth Edition. 8vo. boards, 12s. ; or]2mo. 5s. — A Plain and Affectionate Address to Young Persons about to be Confirmed. Twenty-fourth Edition. 12mo. Ad. — A Plain and Affectionate Address to Young Persons previously to Receiving the Lord's Supper. Fifteenth Edition. 12mo. sewed, 4cf. CANTERBURY, Archbishop of.— A Practical Expo- sition of the New Testament, in the form of Lectures, intended to assist the practice of domestic instruction and devotion. By John Bird, Lord Archbishop of Canterbury. 9 vols. 8vo. cloth (each volume being a separate work), price 9s. J T. Hatchard, 187 Piccadilhj, CANTERBURY, Archbishop of. — Christian Charity; its Obligations and Objects, ■with reference to the present state of Society. In a series of Sermons. Second Edition. 8vo. cloth, 95. ; or 12mo. 65. — Apostolical Preaching Considered, in an Ex- amination of St. Paul's Epistles. Also, Four Sermons on Subjects relating to the Christian IMinistry, and preached on different occa- sions. Ninth Edition, enlarged, 8vo. cloth, IO5. Gd. — Sermons on the Principal Festivals of the Christian Church : to which are added. Three Sermons on Good Friday. Fifth Edition, 8vo. cloth, \0s. M. — The Evidences of Christianity, derived from its Nature and Reception. Seventh Edition, 8vo. cloth, \0s. 6d. ; or fcap. 35. — A Series of Sermons on the Christian Eaith and Character. Eighth Edition, 8vo. cloth, 10s. 6c?. ; or 12mo. &s. — A Treatise on the Records of the Creation, and on the Moral Attributes of the Creator. Sixth Edition, Svo. cloth, 10*. 6d. Christian Sympathy; a Collection of Letters ad- dressed to Mourners. 32mo. cloth, gilt edges, 2s. 6d. Christ our Example. By the Author of "The Listener." Eighth Edition. Fcap. cloth, -55. CONTENTS. 1. In the Object of Life. 2. In the Rule of Life. 3. In his Intercourse with the World. 4. In the Condition of Life. 5. In his Sorrows. 6. In his Joys. 7. In his Death. Christian Observer, conducted by Members of the Established Church, published monthly, Is. 6d. Works Published by CHUETOIT, Rev. H. B. W.— Thoughts on the Land of the Morning; a Record of Two Visits to Palestine, 1849-50. By H. B. WniTAKEE Churton, M.A., Vicar of Icklesham, Sussex, Chapla.in to the Lord Bishop of Chichester, and late Preacher of the Charter- house. Second Edition, corrected and enlarged. Crov/n 8vo. with numerous illustrations, cloth, 10s. Gc?. CLOSE, Dean. — Miscellaneous Sermons, preached at Cheltenham. By the Very Rev. F. Close, D.D., Dean of Carlisle. Second Edition. 2 vols. 8vo. boards, 21^. Common Sense for Housemaids. By A Lady. Second Edition, corrected. 12mo. Is. bd. Companion to the Book of Common Prayer of the United Church of England and Ireland. 24mo. cloth, 2s. Gd. Consistency. By Chaelotte Elizabeth. Sixth Edition. ISmo. boards, 2s. 6d. CRUDEN, A. — A complete Concordance to the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testament ; or, A Dictionary and Alphabetical Index to the Bible. In Two Parts. To which is added, A Concordance to the Apocrypha. By Alexander Crdden, M.A. The Ninth Edition. With a Life of the Author, by Alexander Chal- mers, F.S.A. 4to. boards, II. Is. GUNlfIHGHAM, Eev, J. W. — Sermons. By the Rev. J. W. Cunningham, A.M., Vicar of Harrow, and late Fellow of St. John's College, Cambridge. Fifth Edition. 2 vols. 8vo. bds. 1/. 1*. Six Lectures on the Book of Jonah. Fcap. boards, 3s. The Velvet Cushion. Eleventh Edition. Fcap. boards, 5s. I T. Hatchard, 187 Piccadilly. DRTJMMOND, H. — Social Duties on Christian Principles. By Henry DauMMOND, Esq. M.P. Fifth Edition. Fcap. cloth, 4s. Eighteen Maxims of Neatness and Order. To '^•hich is prefixed an Introduction by Thesesa Tidy. Twenty-fourth Edition. 18mo. sewed, (id. EDELMAN, Eev. W.— Sermons on the Historj^ of Joseph. Preached in the Parish Chui'ch of St. Mary, Wimbledon. By the Rev. W. Edelman, Perpetual Curate of Merton. 12mo. cloth, 5*. The Family Pastor ; or^ Short Sermons for Family Eeading. 12mo. cloth, 35. (id. I EDMUNDS, Rev. J.— The Seven Sayings of Christ I on the Cross. Seven Lent Lectures. To which is prefixed a Gospel j Harmony of the Passion of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. With I Explanatory Notes. By the S.ev. John Edmunds, M.A., formerly ! Fellow of the University of Durham. Fcap. cloth, 3s. 6(/. i Sermons, preached for the most part in a Country Church in the Diocese of Durham. Second Series. Fcap. cloth, .55. 6c?. " The Sennona eontauied in this volume are generally sound and eminentl}'- practical, p_nd admirably adapted for the pui-pose for which they are published — to be read in faniilies to childi-eu and servants on the Sunday evening."— Jo/jji Bull. ELLIOTT, Rev. G. B.— The Rev. C. B. Elliott's Hor^ Apocalypticse ; Abridged for the School-room, and for Family Reading. Second Edition, revised and corrected. AVith a Recommendatory Notice by the Author of the " Horae Apocalypticee." Fcap. cloth, Zs. Far off: Part I. ; or Asia and Australia Described. With Anecdotes and numerous Illustrations. By the Author of " Peep of Day," &c. Twelfth Thousand. Fcap. cloth, 4s. "■ We have Bometimes met tlergj-men who are in the habit of endeavom-iuK to promote the Missionary cause in their parishes, who would be tluuLkful for siich a Mttle book as this. It seems to us just the sort of book that miftht be read out to a class of yoiui},' per- sons, either in Kational Schools or othervdse, and which would be certain to interest them exceedingly."— i:»(/ni.7t Eevieic. Works Published by Far off: Part II. ; or, Africa and America Described. "With Anecdotes and numerous Illustrations. Seventh Thousand. Fcap. cloth, 4s. FENELON. — Extracts from the Religious Works of Fenelon, Archbishop of Cambray. Translated from the Original French. By Miss Marshall. Eleventh Edition, with a Portrait. Fcap. cloth, 5s. FINCHER, J. — The Achievements of Prayer. Selected exclusively from the Holy Scriptures. By the late Joseph FiNCHEK, Esq. With a Testimony to the Work by James Montgomery, Esq., Sheffield. Third Edition. 12mo. cloth, Gs. The Interposition of Divine Providence. Selected exclusively from the Holy Scriptures. 12mo. cloth, Gs. FORSYTH, Rev. J. H. — Sermons by the late Rev. John Hamilton Foksytl', M.A., Curate of Weston-super-Mare, and afterwards Minister of Dowry Chapel, Clifton, Domestic Chaplain to the Marquis of Thomond. With a Memoir of the Author, by the Rev. Edward Wilson, M. A., Vicar of Nocton, Lincolnshire. Third Edition. 8vo. cloth, with Portrait, 10s. Q>d. " The character of Mr. Torayth is one which wo greatly admire," &c.— Christian Oheerver. GARBETT, Archdeacon. — Christ on Earth, in Hea- ven, and on the Judgment-seat. By the Ven. James Garbett, M.A., Archdeacon of Chichester, 2 vols. 12mo. clotb, 12s. "Iso one can read these voliunes without great delight and profit."— CViwf/rt;) Observer. — Parochial Sermons. 2 vols. 8vo. cloth, each 12s. — Christ as Prophet, Priest, and King ; being a Vindication of the Church of England from Theological Novelties. In Eight Lectures, preached before the University of Oxford, at Canon Bampton's Lecture, 1 842. 2 vols. 8vo. cloth II. As. T. Hatchard, 187 Piccadilly. GARBETT, Arclideacon. The Beatitudes of the Mount. In Seventeen Sermons. 12mo. cloth, Is. " There is a depth and a solidity in these discourses, which favonrably distingnish them from so many of the superficial productions with which the press is teeming. The reader cannot but feel that he has something worth thinking ofpresented to him ; and the more he ponders them the greater will he his profit."— CTiure/t o/ Englatid Magazine. GIBBON, E. — The History of the Dechne and Fall of the Roman Empire. By Edward Gibbon, Esq. New Edition, 8 vols. 8vo. cloth, 3/. The Gipsies. Dedicated, by permission, to JajMES Crabb, the Gipsies' Friend. Fcap. cloth, 4s. 6d. GOODE, Rev. F. — The Better Covenant practically Considered, from Heb, viii. 6, 10-12; with a Supplement on Philip. 11. 12, 13, and Notes. By the late Rev. F. Goode, 2»I.A. Fifth Edition. To which is added, A Sermon on Jer. xxxi. 31-34. Fcap. cloth, 7*. GOODE, Rev. W. — The Nature of Christ's Presence in the Eucharist ; or, the True Doctrine of the Real Presence Vindi- cated ; in opposition to the fictitious Real Presence asserted by Arch- deacon Denison, Mr. (late Archdeacon) "NVilberforce, and Dr. Pusey: with full proof of the real character of the attempt made by those authors to represent their doctrine as that of the Church of England and her divines. By William Goode, M.A. F.S. A., Rector of St. Mar- garet, Lothbury. 2 vols. Svo. cloth, 21*. Aid for Determining some Disputed Points — A Yindication of the Doctrine of the Church of England on the Validity of the Orders of the Scotch and Foreign Non-Episcopal Churches. Svo. cloth, Pis. — The Doctrine of the Church of England as to the Effects of Baptism in the case of Infants. "Syith an Appendix, containing the Baptismal Services of Luther and the Nuremberg and Cologne Liturgies. Second Edition. Svo. cloth, 15*. a2 10 Works Published by The Gospel of Other Days ; or, Thoiiglits on Old and New Testament Scriptures." By the Author of '^" Seed Time and Harvest." 18mo. cloth, Is. " We heartily welcome the little 1)001!: .... As a sound and eminently practical compression of a gi-eat siiliject into a very smtill compass, we cuu heartily reconimenu it." — Bicherstcth's Weekly Visitor. GSIFFITH, Rev. T.— The Spiritual Life. By the Rev. TiJosiAS GniFFiTH, A.M., Mini-^ter of Kam's Episcopal Chapel, Homerton. Sixth Edition. Fcap. cloth, 5a-. — Live while You Live ; or. Scripture Yiews of Human Life. Sixth Edition. 18mo. cloth, 2s. Gd. — The Lord's Prayer, contemplated as the Ex- pi-ession of the Primary Elements of Deroutness. Second Edition. Fcap. 8vo. cloth, 35. 6d. — Confirmation and the Baptismal Vow: for Catechumens, Communicants, Parents, and Sponsors. Fourth Edition. Fcap. Svo. cloth, 3s. 6d. — Confirmation; its Nature, Importance^ and Benefits. Fourth Edition, id. ; or 3s. (jd. a dozen. — Our Baptismal Standing practically Con- sklored, 12mo. 1*. 6d. The Lord's Supper; its Nature, Requirements, and Benefits. Third Edition. Fcap. Sto. cloth, 25. 6rf. GHAGLIA, C. — A Pocket Dictionary of the Italian and English Languages. By C. Graglia. Square ISmo. bound, 45. 6rf. I T. Hatchard, 187 Ficcadilhj. U GEAY, Mrs. H. — Emperors of Rome from Augus- tus to Constantine : being a Continuation of the History of RoraeT By Mrs. Hamilton Gbay. 1 vol. 12mo. with Illustrations, %s. " So many applications aro mailo to ns for liistoiies siiitetl to a period of life ■when the mind is beginning to devclope its power, and to find satisfaction in connecting the past viith the present and the future in human affairs, that we are induced to recom- mend those volumes, wliich, however widely circulated, have not half the circulation which they desers-e. They are clearly -*\T:itten. They neither minister to childish im- becility, nor take for granted a measure of Imowledge which cannot be lawfully expected of the young. They present the page of history as it really is — not a series of dry details, nor of gorgeous spectacles, but wth enough of plain fact to instruct the under- standing, ;ind of romantio incident to kindle the sjnnpathies and affections."— Christian Observer. "We have no hesitation in sajing. that this is one of the 1^681 histories of the Eoman Empire for children and young people which has come under our notice. Mrs. Hamil- ton Gray hws made herself acquainted v.-ith at least some of the more important ancient writers on the siibject of which she treats, iind also with the criticisms of Niebuhr and otfaer modern investigators of Roman hiiitovj."—Aihenau}n. "It may be recommended as a clear, rapid, and well-arraBged summary of facts, pointed by freqiient but brief reflections. . . . The book is a verr good compendiiun of the Imperial Historj', primarily designed for children, but useful for all." — Spectator. " It would he an erroneous impression to convey of this volume, that it is written solely for schools and children. In reality it is an abridgment far more liliely to be ixse- fiil to grown-up persons, who can reflect upon the working of general laws, and make their o\\ni obsen-ations upon men and tilings. A striking characteristic of the book is the impartiality of its political tone, and its liigh moral feeling.'"— ^.i-anuner. History of Rome for Young Persons. With numez-ous Wood Engravings. 2 vols. 12mo. cloth, 12s. " A very ingenioiis attempt to bring the recent discoveries of the critical school into working competition with the miserable Goldsmiths and Pinnocks of our youth." — Christian Remembrancer. " The clear, lively, and pleasing style of narration is admirably calculated to awaken and sustain the attention." — Atheiiceum. The History of Etruria. Part I. Tarchun and his Times. From the Foundation of Tarquinia to the Foundation of Rome. Part II. From the Foundation of Rome to the General Peace of Anno Tarquiniensis, 839, b.c, 348. 2 vols, post 8vo. cloth, each 12s. " A work which we strongly recommend as certain to afford pleasure and profit to 6T©Ky rea(liei."—Athenaum. Tour to the Sepulchres of Etruria in 1839. Third Edition. With numerous Illustrations, post 8vo. cloth, IZ. Is. " Mrs. Gray has won an hononrable place in the largo assembly of modem female vf riiex^:'— Quarterly Eevieic. "AVe warmljr recommend Mrs. Gray's most useful and interesting volume." — Edinburtjh li/iViei>. 12 Works Published by GRAY, Miss A. T.— The Twin Pupils; or, Educa- tion at Home. A Tale addressed to the Young. By Ann Thomson Gray. Fcap. cloth, 75. M. " The stor\' is well planned, well varied, and well written." — Spectator. " More sound principles and useful practical remarks we have not lately met in any- work on the much-treated subject of education. The hook is wiitten with Uveliness as well as good serme."— Literary Gazette. " A volume of excellent tendency, wliich may be put with safety and advantaga Into the hands of well-educated young people."— JErnn^eHcn? Magazine. GUIMSTON, Hon. Miss. — Arrangement of the Com- mon Prayer-Book and Lessons. Dedicated, by Permission, to Her Majesty. The peculiar advantage of this arrangement consists in having the entire Morning and Evening Services printed in a large clear type, in two portable volumes, one for the Morning and the other for the Evening. The following are the prices: — Koyal 18 mo. morocco, elegant . Ditto plain Ditto calf, gilt leaves . Royal 32mo. morocco, elegant . Ditto plain Ditto calf, gilt leaves . EANKINSON, Eev. T. E. — Poems. By TiioiHAS Edwakds Hankinson, M. a., late of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, and Minister of St. Matthew's Chapel, Denmark Hill. Edited by his Brothers. Fourth Edition. Fcap. cloth, 75. £ 5. s. Grave and Gav. jMar}^ and Florence at Sixteen. Fifth Edition, Fcap. cloth, Q)S. " These -works ai'e e::cellent. Jliss Tytlor's writings are especially valuable for their ' religious .spirit. She has taken a just )5o'sition betv,-een the Eationahsm of the last gene- . ration and the Puritanism of the present, while the perfect nature and true art with f which she sketches from juvenile life, show powers which might be more ambitiously I displayed, but cannot be better he^^to^^feO.."— Quarterly Review. ' \ TYTLEE, Miss M. F.— The Wooden Walls of Old England: or, Lives of Celebrated Admirals. By Margaret Fkasek Tttler. Containing Biographies of Lord Rodney, Earls Howe and St. Vincent, Lords de Saumarez and CoUingwood, Sir Sydney Smith and Viscount Exmouth. Fcap. cloth, 05. T, Hatchard, 187 Piccadilly, 81 TYTLEE, Miss M. F. Tales of tlie Great and Brave. Containiii Of Slemoirs of Wallace, Bruce, the Black Prince, Joan of Arc, Ricliard Cceur de Lion, Prince diaries Edward Stuart, Nelson, and Napoleon Bonaparte. Second Edition. Fcap. cloth, bs. VSNIiT, Eev. H. — Memoir and Selection from the Correspondence of the Rev. H. Venn, M.A. Edited by the Rev. Hexry Venn, B.D., Prebendary of St. Pavil's. Seventh Edition. Fcap. cloth, 7s. Yersclioyle. A Eoman Catholic Tale of the Kine- teenth Centui'y. 12mo. cloth, 6s. YICTOEIA, Bishop of. — Lewchew and the Lew- chewans; being a Narrative of a Visit to Lewchew, or Loo-Choo, in October, 1850. By George Smith, D.D., Bishop of Victoria. Fcap. cloth, 2s. M. — Hints for the Times; or, the Religions of Sentiment, of Form, and of Feeling, contrasted vrith Vital Godliness. Fcap. sewed. Is. M. " Yei7 Fensihle and well-written reflections on the Histoi-y of St. Jolin. We can safely rccomnieud it.''— Chy'tsiian Guardian. WHITE, Eev. G«— The Natui-al History and Anti- I quities of Selborne. By the Rev. Gilbekt White, M.A. A New Edition, with Notes, by Edward Turner Bennett, Esq,. F.L.S., &c. 8vo. cloth, \Se. A sensible and seasonable little treatise."— CUnstkin Guardian. WEBB, Mrs. J. B. — The Beloved Disciple. Eeflec- ; tions on the History of St. John. By iMrs. J. B. Webb, Author of | " Naomi," " Reflections on the History of Noah," &c. Fcap. 8vo. cloth, ! 4*. 6d. ' 32 Works Published by T. Hatchard, WILL YAMS, Miss J. L.— Chillon; or, Protestants of the Sixteenth Century. An Historical Tale. By Jane Louisa Wil- LTAMs. 2 vols. 8vo. cloth, 10:?. " M'e tliink highly of this pathetic ston-. A trae spirit of cheeiful piety pen-ades its pages ; the characters are nicely discriminated, and mauy of the scenes are very vi\"idly portrayed. All who read it may derive benefit ft-om its perusal." — Britajtni-a. "WOLFE, Rev. C. — Six Plain Sermons, preacliecl to a Rural Congregation. By the Rev. Charles Wolfe, late Curate of Kemsing, Kent. Fcap. cloth, 2s. 6d. "Words of Wisdom for my Child ; being a Text for Every Day in the Year, for the*^use of very Young Children. Second Edition. 32mo. cloth, 2s. WOODWARD, Rev. H. — Thoughts on the Character and History of Nehemiah. By the Rev. Henry Woodward, A.M., for- merly of Corpus Christi College, Oxford ; Rector of Fethard, in the Diocese of Cashel. Fcap. 8vo. cloth, 3i. Gd. — Short Readings for Family Prayers, Essays, and Sermons. 8vo. cloth, 12s. YORKE, Rev. C. J. — Original Researches in the Word of God. By the Rev. C. J. Yorke, M.A., Rector of Shenfield. Fcap. cloth, 5s. I. Christ Known before His Advent. II. The Beauty of the Mosaic Law. III. Inspiration and Genius. IV. The Divine Recognition of the Spiritual Church. V. The Development of Pure Religion. VI. The Apostolic Motive. VII. God Apparent in His Miracles and Prophecies. VIII. Scriptural Imagery : its Uses, Marks, and Sources. IX. God Traced in the World, and Found in Christ. X. The Human Conscience. 1S7 Piccadilly.