,^^ ^1^ BX 7233 .C33 C5 Campbell, R. J. 1867-1956 City Temple sermons CITY TEMPLE SERMONS CITY TEMPLE SERMONS BY R. J. CAMPBELL, M. A, of London NEW YORK CHICAGO TORONTO FLEMING H. REVELL COMPANY LONDON AND EDINBURGH Copyright, 1903, by FLEMING H. REVELL COMPANY (June) THIRD EDITION New York: 158 Fifth Avenue Chicago: 63 Washington Street Toronto: 27 Richmond Street, W. [.ondon: 21 Paternoster Square Edinburgh: 30 St. Mary Street AN OUTLOOK THERE are not a few persons who maintain that the day of religious enthusiasm is past and gone for ever ; that men are becoming in- creasingly secular in interest and outlook; and that faith has given way before the broad light of reason. This opinion is freely expressed both in the study and in the street ; but, if we interpret the signs of the times correctly, the facts are against it, and in favour of the hope of a revival of religious fervour, zeal, and power. Some of these indications can be briefly stated. There is, to begin with, a somewhat different mood observable in the younger ministry of the evangelical churches. The intellectual sermon per se, itself a re- action against an unintellectual type of gospel preach- ing, is giving way to a more spiritual form of address which, without ceasing to be thoughtful, appeals to the spiritual instincts of the hearer and quickens the moral sense. Another sign is to be found in the atti- tude of the hearers themselves. With comparatively few exceptions, congregations do not ask either for scientific lectures, or literary theses, in the place of sermons. They do not seek ornate and pompous dis- courses on the one hand, or conventional platitudes on the other; but they hunger for something strong, and deep, and true, suggestive of heaven and holiness, and 3 4 AN OUTLOOK the living, loving Christ. The more direct and simple the style, and the more rich and real the spiritual ex- perience of the preacher, the more the people welcome the message. They crave the note of certainty. Nor is this all. The world cannot live on negations and pessimisms for ever. We have had our period of criticism, analysis, and sweeping demolitions. Science has had her say, and revised her dicta more than once. Biblical criticism has, in some instances, almost reached the reductio ad absurdum stage. The fash- ionable mental mood has been, and perhaps still is, agnosticism. We even hear a shout of triumph from the side of those unaccountable people who desire to see religion discredited. But the shout is itself an in- dication in favour of the recrudescence of faith. His- tory can furnish many parallels for it. But always in the history of Christendom, at the very moment when revealed religion has been declared to be dead and buried, God's prophets have arisen and bidden the dry bones live. History will repeat itself once more. Hu- man nature can never long rest in a pessimism. Whensoever the spiritual faculty has, for any length- ened period, been repressed or obscured, it has always reasserted itself even to extravagance. Is it not the case at this very moment? The hearing obtained by Dowieism, Christian Science, and such-like, is an evi- dence of this, and a tacit rebuke against our feeble Vvays of setting forth the unsearchable riches of Christ. But, above all, we may hope much from the prayer circles that are springing up in all directions through- out the land, with the avowed object of waiting upon God for a revival of His work. Such prayer cannot AN OUTLOOK 5 fail, for God cannot deny Himself, Christ is more than ever the great necessity, and the one central hope for poor humanity. There is some speculation as to the form which such revival may take when it comes. Some people say it will be mainly ethical, and less emotional than most previous religious movements have been. Others be- lieve it will take the fonn of a quickened interest in social justice, a great awakening on the part of the Churches in favour of the poor, the unprivileged, and the oppressed. No doubt there is truth in all these suppositions, but, if we refer to history once more, we learn the lesson that all Christian revivals have begun in the reawakening of devotion to Christ, the Saviour and Lord. We may call this emotion, if we please, but it has taken precedence of all ethical enthusiasms and social readjustments ; in fact, made them possible. Such was the revival of Francis, of Luther, of Wesley, of Moody. It may be questioned whether ethical endeavour, apart from faith, has ever succeeded at all. The char- acter it has formed, and is forming in our midst to- day, tends to be self-conscious and introspective; whereas morality at its highest loses sight of itself as its own object, and becomes devotion to a Divine ideal. A quickened spiritual life in the Churches, a recov- ered enthusiasm, a new sense of the presence of Christ as Deliverer and Lord, would set free grand social enthusiasms, and supply an ethical dynamic compared with which all others are feeble indeed. For this we need the power of the Holy Spirit of God. We need not to pray for a second Pentecost. The Spirit once given is here for ever. We need con- 6 AN OUTLOOK secrated men and women. Let us pray, and trust, and expect. If we have not faith enough, let us ask for it; if we are not sufficiently in earnest, let us humble ourselves, and entreat the Lord to give us to our Master. Surely He will hear. CONTENTS I. What Is God ? , . . . II. What Is Man ? . . , . III. Personal Communion with God, IV. Can God Answer Prayer ? V. Supposing Christ Were only a Man, VI. God's Remedy for Sin, VII. The Mystery of Pain, VIII. Christianity and the Social Order, IX. The Divine Ideal of Manhood, X. Christ and Character-Building, XI. Overcoming for God, XII. Conscience in Common Life, XIII. Personal Immortality, XIV. The Doctrine of Divine Love, XV. Praying in Christ Jesus, XVI. The Essence of Christianity, XVII. The Antiphony of Penitence, XVIII. The Dayspring, . XIX, God's New Year, XX. The Minor Offence, . XXI. Vision and Service, XXII. The Prophet in Prayer, XXIII. Passive Resistance, PAGE 9 20 3S 45 54 64 76 93 107 120 131 143 15& 167 178 191 202 213 224 234 247 262 275 WHAT IS GOD? God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in titne past unto the fathers by the prophets, hath in these last days spoken unto us by His Son. — Hebrews i. 1-2. He that comet h to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of them that diligently seek Him. — Hebrews xi, 6. PROFESSOR HAECKEL, almost the last sur- viving exponent of scientific materialism, says that God, Freedom, and Immortality are the three great buttresses of superstition which it must be the business of science to destroy. Of these three sub- jects the first is overwhelmingly the greatest, and we ,will address ourselves to the question " What is God? " The passages chosen to guide our meditation not only state the question, but also the conditions upon which an answer can be expected, and has actually been given ; for every man believes in God, even when he denies, as I shall endeavour to show. There is no quarrelling at the starting-point ; those who ask the question, What is God? already believe that He is. The difference between the creeds of those who speak confidently about the nature of God, and those who speak hesitatingly, is less in what they respectively say than in what they do not say ; it depends upon what we put into the meaning of that word of three letters, 9 10 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS which is the greatest in the EngHsh tongue. " He that Cometh unto God " does believe that He is, and some believe that He is a rewarder of them that diligently seek Him. Moreover, the highest spiritual experience rises above this, in maintaining that God, who is never within sight, but who from the beginning of time hath spoken unto men, hath in the last days spoken unto us by His Son ; and when we have heard and seen the Son, the Christ in whom Christians believe, there is nothing more that we know or need to know in answer to the question. What is God ? I can imagine someone saying at this point, " Are you quite sure that we are all agreed about the being of God ; is there no doubt about the question whether God is • have we nothing to ask but the question what He is ? " My answer is, Undoubtedly I am right, and you yourself are my witness. There are at least three orders of mind, which represent three different ways of thinking about the fundamental questions of our being and our destiny — the scientific mind, the philo- sophic mind, the religious mind. In one of those three classes every man finds a place. The man of science may not be conspicuously in evidence, but the men trained under scientific methods are. Those who have been to school within the last twenty years know well that it is impossible to escape the habit of mind which is the result of inductive — that is, of scientific — reason- ing. Then there are the men of philosophic tempera- ment, who start by believing in mind. Whether aught else is real or no, they believe in the ]\lind that thinks the world. They believe in their own mind, they may believe in a Whole Mind greater than their own, but still mind. And the religious man would say, " I WHATISGOD? U believe not only in my own mind, but I believe in a Mind which is the source of mine; I believe not only in my own soul, I believe in the Oversoul. Moreover, I believe in an essential relationship between my soul and that Soul ; the Father of my spirit is ever speaking unto me." It is often said that a three-cornered contest is going on between the representatives of these three temperaments, and that in two of them at least at the present time the antagonism is more pronounced than it has ever been before. This question has been ad- dressed to me recently, " Is not the rift between science and religion wider than it ever was ? " Thank God, no ! I am well aware that some of the exponents of science and some of the professors of religion con- scientiously think that it is ; but to me, on the contrary, the future is full of hope, because of this — that for the first time in the history of human thought science, philosophy, and religion have a common starting-point — the human mind, viewing itself as part of an ordered whole, or as one effect of a Universal Cause. All three, through their exponents, affirm God, if they affirm at all. Let us take the three positions seriatim. The old materialism is gone ; it is as dead as the first edition of the Encyclopcedia Britannica. To-day men do not think of atoms and molecules as being the ulti- mate reality. If Miss Marie Corelli were going to write "The Mighty Atom" over again, she would write it differently, or, if you will excuse an Irishism, she would not write it at all. The man of science has ceased to speak of materialism as the explanation of life and mind, although many are old enough to re- member Professor Tyndall's famous dictum about that. 12 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS Modern science speaks of a Universal Substance which, if it be matter, is also mind, but may be neither. To the man of science God, law, and the universe are one and the same; to him, again, the universe is self-contained, self-explanatory, self-acting by its own laws. Again, the man of science no longer speaks about a dead world of matter over against a living world of men. These are not two, but one ; there is no death, but only life. The distinction between the organic and the inorganic is going, or gone. Nothing is dead, all is alive, the light from heaven and the dust on the ground. The Universal Substance is one; ever in movement. Here it is a sob, there a song ; here it is the mud on London streets, there the men who walk on it ; here it is a vapour, there a prayer; yonder a mountain, here a Gladstone ; but all the while the same Substance in myriad manifestation, never at rest, ceaselessly acting, in infinite forms. Did I say rightly at the beginning of this sermon when I affirmed that the man of science has his God ? The L^niversal Substance is his God. He would say. All is God, and God is all. His quarrel with religion consists, not in what he says that the man of religion does not say, but in what he does not say that the man of religion does say. Let me study the position of the philosophy of the moment. Until quite recently the system of philosophy which held the field was what has been called Con- sistent Idealism. Do not be afraid of the word — it is very simple, after all. It means no more than this — that every man, thinking about everything, starts by assuming his own mind and the validity of his own judgment. To be consistent he must not assume any- body else's mind — only his own. So that every one of W H A T I S G O D ? 13 us, looking out on the rest of the world, might say, " I am ; perhaps nobody else is ; it may be that my mind is the only mind in the wide universe of things ; it may be that outside of my being there is no being; every- thing that passes into my experience comes as a series of mind-pictures, passing in idea before my mind." That idealism has completely broken down. Common sense steps in and declares, though you cannot prove it, that there are other minds than yours — you are only one, a spark perhaps, of the Universal Mind. You can enter into relations, soul with soul, with others of whose being you can have no reasonable doubt. So Consistent Idealism has gone, just as Scientific Mater- ialism has gone, and in the place of both we have now the Universal Substance on the side of science, and on the side of philosophy the Universal Mind. What says the man of religion? His position will not take long to state, because we all know it. Every- thing which science has said so far I can say, you can say. God is all, and in all ; nowhere is He not ; in every comer of the pathless universe He dwells and reigns. He is the power behind all things, in all things ; through Him all things consist; He is the intimately near, as well as the infinitely far. But where the man of science stops short in declaring that the universe is self-contained and self-explanatory, the man of religion goes on to say. The universe of universes cannot con- tain my God. And where the man of philosophy would say, God is the Universal Mind, the man of religion would say, God is the Universal Heart ; and in the words of the noble psalm our pra5^er is ever rising thus, " Search me, O God, and know my heart ; try me, and know my thoughts, and see if there be any wicked way 14 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS in me, and lead me in the way that lasteth long." So we go a long way together, and that is why I think that for religion to-morrow will be a day of hope; I am waiting to see religion and Christ rehabilitated on the side both of science and philosophy; I am waiting to see Christian experience vindicated, and the day of the Lord is at hand. But someone will cry out in expostulation, " Are you sure of all this? I am not prepared to go as far as you. If this is the experience of religious minds, it is not mine — I would that it were ; but I can find no trace on the field of history or in the field of present-day experience of such a God as you name ; the shame, the horror, and the woe of the world seem to contradict your belief in a God whose name and nature are Love." Wait a bit; you have forgotten something — the rela- tivity of knowledge. All our thought about the things which come within the region of observation is relative ; the actual you do not know, at any rate by your in- ductive methods. The relativity of knowledge means that you can know nothing within the wide universe except as your mind permits you to know it, and that mind operates within certain arbitrary limits which intellect, but not experience, can never pass. When I look up into the dome of heaven I know that I am look- ing into infinity ; this morning the sun has come 95,000,000 of miles to smile upon us a watery smile. That immensity is a something we cannot grasp. But sweep it out of existence, let the 95,000,000 of miles be as if they had never been — how much is left? Blot out the visible universe — what have you retained? As much as there was before. Now, what becomes of the validity of your scientific laws, — gravitation, con- W H A T I S G O D ? 15 servation of energy, and what not ? Are they untrue ? No, I do not say that, but they are only relatively true. You know that the actuality is infinity. The moment you have touched that concept you have passed it ; but experience cannot go where your mind has thrust itself. I do not say that your scientific judgments are wrong; I say they are relative, and you have to stop at your limits. Here is a better illustration, perhaps. Look at these beautiful stained glass windows all the way round this church ; as we sit worshipping we can enjoy them. But suppose that in the audience is a man who is colour- blind; to that man the stained window below the gallery, and the frosted glass window above, are, save perhaps in outline, just the same. Now, what is wrong — the window or his perception of it? There is something short in his brain, he cannot see things as we see them ; but perhaps even we cannot see them as they really are ; there is a reality outside which makes us see colour and form, but perhaps there is more to see than any of us knows. I do not deny the reality ; what I assert is the limit of our perception. The organist leads our devotions very beautifully on the great organ, we feel the hand of a master on the instrument. As a matter of fact, the hand of the master is on us ; he sets the air vibrating, and when the vibrations reach our brain, we cannot explain the mystery, but we hear the harmony. If there were present a man who is not deaf, but who has no ear for music, what would he think about it all? His experience would be widely different from ours; are we to argue, therefore, that there was no organ? No. No harmony, then? No; but that the man was a faculty short, and the reality 16 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS could not make itself known to him. It is related of Mr. Spurgeon, who, as is well known, had no ear for music, that on one occasion he was sitting with a friend listening to an orchestra playing a beautiful symphony, and his friend said to him, *' Surely, Mr. Spurgeon, you enjoy it?" "No," said the great preacher, "I don't." " But," he said, " it is exquisite." " Well," was the reply, " if every player in that orchestra had his instrument tuned to a different key and went on playing the s)'mphony, how would you feel ? " His friend said, " Indescribable." " Well," said Mr. Spur- geon, " that is how I feel now." What shall we argue from that? That the limit on one side of Mr. Spur- geon's perception came sooner than in the case of his friend ; it does not argue that there was no symphony to hear, it argues that his knowledge of what he did hear was only relative to the whole. That is so with all knowledge. We know the realities of infinity and eternity; in our practical acquaintance we stop short with the symbols of time. Then, you may say. What are you doing now ? Are you going to destroy everything we know? Is there anything of which we can be sure? any point where we touch the reality? Yes, personality is the ultimate reality. The only thing in the wide universe of which you can be sure is soul. Things may not be what they seem, but when you have spoken with your friend face to face you have spoken with a reality which is not other and cannot be other than it seems to you. Com- munion of soul is the only real communion. " Stop ! " you say, "that is an assumption." Is it? You have made it already ; your man of science has made it. The validity of his judgments depends upon his assumption WHATISGOD? 11 of himself ; unless he has made that assumption, he can get nowhither. Is it an assumption? Why, all your doings in life are based upon it; you would not have been here but for that relationship between reality and reality, soul and soul, which you know to be human society. Can we get farther? Is there a Soul of souls — " the Oversoul," as Emerson would have called it? Yes, says the highest experience the v/orld has ever known. An assumption? Of course; an as- sumption borne out by experience like yours. You have no right to assume me any more than I have a right to assume God, and if you are certain of the com- munion between my soul and yours, I am no less certain of the communion between my soul and His. God is all and in all. Soul of our soul. Father of our spirits. The highest experience the world has ever known says that, and that experience is constant. If in any century we could prove it gone, my theme would have been very differently phrased. But when humanity has been at its noblest, humanity has been holding on to the sense of intercourse with things unseen and eternal, with Soul, which is God. Here some may ask me for evidence. What is my evidence? Yourself. You challenge me about Him whose ways are in the sea, you remind me of the dread- fulness of life, the tragedies of every day and hour; you come pouring in from the Stock Exchange, and Fleet Street, and the Strand, and you tell me you have seen sights which have stirred your heart, made it beat fast with pity, and caused you to say, " Poor Hu- manity ! Where is the hope, after all ? Is God blind and deaf and dumb ? " You think about those thirty thousand people swept into eternity amidst dreadiul 18 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS torture in the West Indies the other day, and you say, " Is this the work of a father? " I cannot stop to in- vestigate that problem now, we will come to it in time ; here is the answer for the moment. You are as much a product of the Universal Substance as is Mont Pelee; perhaps you are more explanatory of what the Uni- versal Substance is. Do you pity? Then, if the Uni- versal cannot, Nature in one of her moods has produced something nobler than herself, and that is you. Is the Universal Substance conscious, is it moral? does it know and feel and care? can I enter into relationship with it? As soon as experience has said Yes, then I have discovered God to be a rewarder of them that diligently seek Him, and highest of all. I do not wait upon your experience only ; I look back upon the field of history, and I ask, Whence came that idea of God we are now holding before each other's mind? My gaze rests on one day and on one Being; that day 1900 years ago, when Jesus of Nazareth preached on the hillsides of Galilee, and had compassion upon the people that were scattered as sheep with no shepherd ; and there I see whence came that idea of God which is the only one with which human nature will ever be satisfied again. I listen to the voice in the upper room, I hear the questioning of Philip, " Lord, show us the Father, and we shall be satisfied," and I hear the voice Divine, as He answers, " Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known Me? He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father." When we have seen Jesus we may have many things to learn concerning the fathom- less purposes of God, but of His nature we need to learn nothing at all — we know it. At the heart of the universe reigns One with the heart of a little child. i WHATISGOD? 19 Do not stop to perplex yourself with questions about the Trinity. If God be like Jesus, if Jesus can pledge God, humanity has nothing more to fear. If Jesus had died cursing and raving against the faith He had preached; if He had died protesting that the Father had failed Him ; if He had died calling down impre- cations upon His murderers, I should have had no Gospel to preach. But it was not so ; He died saying, "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do. Into Thy hands I commend My spirit." Jesus is the Soul of the universe. He is the Self of our selves, and the Life of our lives. There may be a universe of universes beyond with which we have noth- ing to do, but in the universe with which we have to do the ultimate is Jesus. Jesus came suffering. If He had come in great glory, I would have had no Gospel to preach to-day. He was born in a stable, cradled in a manger, lived a suffering life, and died a shameful death. " O God, O kinsman loved, but not enough ! O Man, with eyes majestic after death, Whose feet have toiled along our pathways rough, Whose lips drawn human breath ! " The Cross of Calvary is the key to creation. We see God plainest in the pathos of life ; everything noble rises there. Here we come near to the heart of things ; here can experience rest and be satisfied ; and we may say with the Quaker poet of America : " A marvel seems the universe, A miracle our life and death, A mystery which I cannot pierce, Around, above, beneath. Now my spirit sighs for home. And longs for light whereby to see. And like a weary child has come, O, Father, unto Thee." II WHAT IS MAN? What is man, that thou art inindfiil of him ? And the son of man, that thou visit est him r For thou hast jftade him but little lower than God, And crownest /lif/i ivith glory and honour. — Psalm via. 4-j. R. V. All have sinned afid come short of the glory of God. — Rom. Hi. 2 J. WE have seen that the first of all questions is What is God ? When once a man has settled this question for himself he is in possession of a philosophy of life and an imperative of conduct. The question, you observe, i$ not whether God is ; that is beyond discussion. I have tried to show that every man believes in God even when he says he does not; but all men do not believe in the same view of the aiature of God. Hence it is that upon a man's doctrine of God depends his view of himself and of the destiny of humanity as a whole. If he thinks meanly of the one, he thinks meanly of the other ; if he thinks nobly of the one, he thinks nobly of the other ; and when once he has come to affirm the Christian view of the nature of God — that He is Father, Saviour, Redeemer, Friend — then, and not till then, are we in a position to con- sider hopefully the question, What is man ? To that question many answers of a conflicting nature have been g'iven, and are being- given in the world of thought and action. Suppose I put the ques- 20 WHATISMAN? 21 tion to some medical student, " Can you, sir, tell me what is man ? " and it is possible he may answer thus, ** Man is a highly developed vertebrate, a more or less clever and successful ape, who has worsted his com- petitors in the struggle for existence, and stands as conqueror at the head of things." I may put the ques- tion to yonder pessimistic philosopher, whose pity for humanity lacks nothing of our own, but whose confi- dence in the destiny of humanity is the accompaniment of his answer to this question, What is man ? "I ask you, sir, what have you to say in answer to the Psalmist ? " Listen to him. " Man is a vapour, a breath that passeth away; man is as a bubble upon the wave of causation, here to-day, gone to-morrow, gone for ever. Man is but one of nature's many ex- periments, and is to make way by-and-bye for another and perhaps a greater. Man has no destiny beyond that which he pictures to himself in his own fancy. In the words of that immortal pessimist, Omar Khayyam : "The Worldly Hope men set their Hearts upcn Turns ashes — or it prospers ; and anon. Like Snow upon the Desert's dusty face, Lighting a little hour or two — is gone." I will put the question to this busy City man, "What have you to say in answer to the Psalmist's question ; what would you say of yourself? " The answer might be, " I do not know ; it takes me all my time to live ; my horizon is narrow and contracted, and when I think I get no nearer to the solution of the great mystery." " Art is long, and Time is fleeting, And our hearts, though stout and brave. Still, like muffled drums, are beating Funeral marches to the grave." 22 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS Now, over against those answers set the words of the Psalmist, and with these ringing in our ears let us address ourselves anew to the statement of our position in the great order of the universe. " IV/ien I co7isider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers. The moon atid the stars, which thou hast ordained ; What is man, that thou art nmidful of him ? And the son of man, that thou visitest him ? For thou hast jnade him but little lower than God, And crownest him with glory attd honour." There, on that statement of experience, I pin my faith. When we have answered the question What is God? there is no room for pessimism in the statement of the question What is man ? I therefore ask you to consider this answer of the Psalmist under the three following divisions : ( i ) Man is that part of the great scheme of things which is the best explanation of the whole. (2) He has some power of self-direction and self-control, and therefore of moral responsibility. He is a universe within a universe. (3) The destiny of humanity is bound up with that of Jesus Christ. I. Man is that expression, that part of the great scheme of things which is the best explanation of the whole. As we have said before, I see no objection to the declaration that from one point of view God and Law and the Universe are one. Even to the Christian, God, self-limited, is the Universe. When we are trying to get to the secret of the Universe we are really striv- ing after the explanation of the nature of God. Those two questions are one and the same. So, my friend, the medical student, when you go back to your labora- tory, no matter what you may call the work in which you are engaged, it is nothing more nor less than this ; WHATISMAN? 23 In trying to find out the secret of phenomena, you are trying to discover the nature of God. Now, where can we look for that? I answer, in the microcosm of the great macrocosm of existence. You must read man to find out what God is. I am not afraid of anthro- pomorphism, provided you keep your hand firmly upon it. A French writer once sarcastically said, " In the beginning God created man in His own image, and ever since then man has been returning the compliment by making God in his." What else are we to do ? You must read God by the highest of that whole which God has produced — humanity; and by that I do not mean to say you must read God by what you are, but by what you have been made capable of seeing — and that is another thing. So, in spite of the evil, woe, sin, and imperfection of humanity, the great witness in the world for the nature of God is that which hu- manity has been made capable of seeing and being. Once in the field of history our eyes have seen and our hands have handled the word of life. Humanity has not been kept in the dark as to what it is intended to be. We have looked once, and seen, and to-day all men, in this country, at any rate, whether they are Christian or Pagan, declare that in Jesus Christ we have seen that attainment of human nature which is worthy to be God, whether it is or not. *' Truth is within ourselves ; It takes no rise from outward things, Whate'er we may believe." Here I will hazard a proposition — that no man ever yet reasoned out his position in regard to truth, and especially theological truth. You never yet attained 24 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS to truth by a process of ratiocination ; you have simply seen it, and that is all ; and every wise man, no matter hov/ wise he may be, does just that. He sees a thing, and then he sets to work to find out how he saw it. Once, on the field of history, we have seen humanity at its best; and for nineteen hundred years we have been trying to find out how to attain to an ideal for ourselves which has already been manifested in his- tory. We know now what man is, and it has been well said, " An honest man is the noblest work of God." Shall I say a holy man ? In other words, the nearest approach you can find to the ideal of Jesus Christ — ■ that is, the highest declaration of the nature of the Divine that we have ever had; and it is that which entitles us to call God Father. Burns said, in words which are as much English as Scotch now : "A king can mak' a belted knight. A marquis, duke, an' a' that ; But an honest man's abune his might — Gude faith, he maunna fa' that ! " For a' that, an' a* that, Our toils obscure, an' a' that, The rank is but the guinea stamp » The man's the gowd for a' that." When you have attained to personality, when you have discovered a man soul to soul, heart to heart, mind to mind, you have discovered the ultimate reality of the Universe. For God, who is the Father of our spirits, is not less than personal ; He is our Father, our Friend, and no man can come unto the Father but by looking unto the Christ, who has revealed what the Father is. ,W H A T I S M A N ? 25 There arises in our mind a claim upon the Father- hood of God consequent upon the discovery that we can enter into relations with Him. I ask young men especially, Have you ever felt upon you the almost ir- resistible impulse to utter yourself to the Unseen — to know, to pray, to serve that nobler than yourself, that once you have seen in Christ and now associate with God? Well, when you have done that you have made a claim upon the Unseen which is an affirmation of your eternal citizenship. " Life is real, life is earnest, And the grave is not its goal, Dust thou art, to dust returnest, Was not spoken of the soul." If you can pray to God, if God has ever spoken to you, you have claimed something greater than time : the eternity of God presumes the immortality of man. " How poor, how rich, how abject, how august. How complicate, how wonderful is man ! " The Psalmist was right when he said, " A little lower than God, crowned with glory and honour," fitted for a greater sphere of activity than earth can ever pre- sent. Man was made to reign with God eternally in the heavens. " When I consider thy heavens, the work of thy fingers. The moon attcl the stars, which thou hast ordained ; What is man, that thou art mindful of him. And the son of tnati, that thou visitest him ? '• Man is Thy child, my Father! and w^e shall seek Thee in the city which hath foundations whose builder and maker is God. 26 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS II. We have some power of self-direction and self- control. The latest cult of the hour, which, after all, is a very old one, is that none of us can help being what we are; that if we have made mistakes in life, we are to be pitied rather than blamed ; that in point of fact heredity and environment will account for everything; that far back in the mysterious past, all that has come to you, and all that you are, was already foreordained. I will admit that there is very little room that I can find for escape from determinism, if we stick to logic; so, therefore, I should say that if this man is bad and that man is good, logically we cannot praise the good and we cannot blame the bad. But there are some things higher than logic. The love of children, friends, home, the most illogical thing imaginable — what would life be without it? When we say efifect must invariably follow cause, and for every effect there is an antecedent cause, there is a question v\hich philosophy cannot an- swer — why should any effect follow any cause? I take up this hymn-book, and I choose to drop it. You say it will fall and hit the floor for certain. A man of science might be more careful, and say, " Probably it will fall, for books dropped so have fallen so often that by an observable number of sequences we have deduced a law, and we call it gravitation." The effect of the letting go probably will be that the book will fall. Why should that effect follow that cause? We are back on the old mystery. We are on the borderland again of the question of the relative nature of the data on which all the conclusions about our life and history are based. So we go back from the consideration of these curi- ous and unprofitable questions to the simple experience WHAT IS MAN ? 27 of simple men. You know perfectly well, and no onel will ever reason you out of it, that if you did a mean ■ thing yesterday, and conscience tells you about it to- day, you are being reminded that you need not have done it, and that you are a guilty man. We will go farther than that, and say that if our responsibility for sin — there ! the word has got in ; it is not only the theologian's word, it is a word of the newspaper and the fireside, and of the business house, and every place where men meet and serve. Our responsibility for sin, I was going to say, may be less than we think, but you can never explain it away altogether. Recently we were all agitated in common with the rest of England when we heard of a certain case in which a mother in high station had ill-treated her little child. London rang with protests ; we said, " There is evidently one law for the rich and another for the poor; this woman should have been punished more than she was, and the judge was unfair." We may have been right, or we may have been wrong, about the case of little Con- nie Penruddock, but there is no mistake about the fact that the community, one and all, without reasoning on the question, at once jumped to the conclusion that both mother and judge were to blame; and in so doing we have presumed responsibility to some- one or to some great thing for what we are 'and what we do. " Here ! " says a man, " don't go too far ; you little know how I have been fighting this week, and how I have been beaten in spite of myself. You could not despise me more than I despise myself, but my moral weakness is such that I never can hope to gain a victory over the man that now is. Made in the image 28 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS of God, indeed; more likely I have been made in the image of the devil ! " You are not the first who has said this. We will go back to the New Testament, and to that wise man who said, " Who shall deliver me from the body of this death ? The thing I would, I do not ; the thing I would not, that do I." Now emerges that huge problem, not merely of responsibility, but of escape from things we are prone to do — the problem of sin. It is not only a problem for preachers ; it is a problem for every man. The question of responsibility comes up — to whom shall we flee except to Him who is the Father of our spirits, and to that unnameable right which every one of us feels pleads within his heart when he gives way to wrong. Here rises the question, to which there is only one answer, and that answer is the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Speaking plain words to plain men, let me say this : Your sense of sin already exists, whether you have a sense of God or not. Here is a curious thing — a man lay awake last night because of one guilty fact in his existence he would be glad to get rid of. It is not God he has been thinking of, nor God he fears ; it is that law of righteousness which will not be gainsaid, and which is ever speaking in his poor per- turbed human heart. Yes, the law of sin is a powerful fact in humanity. " All have sinned and come short of the glory of God." Do not talk about a fall in the far past ; men can wrangle forever about that, and get no nearer to the facts. Speak about this, which you know to be the truth, that, whether any m.an besides your- self has ever fallen or not, you have fallen. III. Now we come to our third point, which as briefly as may be is this : The destiny of men is, whether they W H A T I S M A N ? 29 know it or not, bound up with that of Jesus Christ. Only once have we seen anyone who could be termed sinless ; and the challenge which was given to the world nineteen hundred years ago, when Christ was help- less in the hands of His accusers, to the accusers them- selves, " Which of you convinceth Me of sin ? " is the world's hope at this moment. I state a proposition which cannot be proved — nothing worth proving can be proven ; and it matters very little — it is this : Sin- lessness and Deity involve each other; suffering and humanity involve each other. When we have stated the perfect Man, we have declared a suffering Saviour; when we have spoken about a suffering Saviour, we have declared incarnate God, and, as has been beauti- fully said, " God became man that man might become God." " He was made sin for us who knew no sin that we might become the righteousness of God in Him." If there never had been a Jesus Christ humanity would have been crying out for Him to-day, or for one such as He, to do the work He claims to do. We cannot rise of ourselves from that slough in which we are, however we got there. Sin is intractable, the one problem for which no parliament is sufficient, and with which no human wisdom can cope. Hear it, as the Master preached it, as of old, the only One who ever declared Himself able to loose the bands and let us go free. If Jesus Christ can be proved to have been no Saviour, and to have had no more right to speak in the name of God than the sinful man who addresses you, then it is worse for humanity than if He had never come at all; for until the Dayspring from on high men were looking hopefully forward for someone to come, something from out the mystery to save; so CITY TEMPLE SERMONS and when Jesus came they thought they had found Him, and for nineteen hundred years we have been preaching the sinless One, by the Story of the Cross, as the One who is mighty to save. If that Gospel were a lie, better there had never been a Jesus ; it is worse than if there had been no Gospel to proclaim. When we claim that the Christ is able to save, we look beyond the immediate moment, back into human history, and we hear men say, " He has shown Himself able to keep." Is the Christ, who is humanity, the head and the representative of the best in humanity, the Christ who is our hope, reigning at the heart of things or not ? If He is, and this is His world, well it is for you and me ! " What is man, that thou art mindful of him? and the son of man, that thou visitest him? Thou hast made him but little lower than God." Taking hold of Christ, he has taken hold of God, and, though all have sinned and come short of His glory, we reign through the merit of the sinless One to all eternity. Henry Drummond on one occasion was crossing the Atlantic, and on the deck of the vessel on which he was sailing a number of passengers had gathered to sing hymns, as they often do, and the hymn chosen on that evening happened to be " Jesus, Lover of My Soul." As one man sang, another listened to him with considerable interest, and at the close said : " I feel I have heard your voice before ; can you tell me where it was? " " No," said the singer, " but the singing of this hymn recalls to me an interesting event in my life. I was a soldier in the Confederate Army in the great Civil War. I was on outpost duty one night in a lonely place. It was reported that the enemy were in a wood near by. I knew my life was in great WHATISMAN? 81 danger. To keep up my spirits, I sang- this hymn, and when I came to the hne ' Cover my defenceless head with the shadow of Thy wing,' it seemed as if all my fears passed away, and I stood for the rest of the night as firm and fearless as though it were daylight. I felt as if my prayer had been answered somehow." " Now," said the other, " you listen to my story. I was an officer in the Northern Army, and that night I was scouting in the wood you mention. That was where I heard your voice, and as you sang ' Jesus, Lover of my Soul,' we were drawing near, not know- ing what you sang. When I and my men came within ear-shot you had just reached the words, which you sang out louder than the rest : " ' Cover my defenceless head With the shadow of Thy wing,'" and at that moment we had you covered with the muz- zles of a dozen rifles. My men were just waiting for the word to send you into eternity, but when you sang that line, I turned to them and said, ' Rifles down ; let us go back to camp.' " Here they met, on the deck of a ship in mid-ocean, to tell about the Christ that had governed the act of the one and saved the life of the other. It is a simple story, but it brings me to the point where I would bring every man if I could. You do not feel yourself able for your own life and destiny to say with the soldier : " Thou, O Christ, art all I want, More than all in Thee I find, Raise the fallen, cheer the faint, Heal the sick, and lead the blind." 32 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS You can venture your all upon that Man who leads on before. Still I see Him leading there! At the Cross of Calvary there is life and hope for humanity. What is man? August and abject ! What is man? A child of God, a child of shame. What is man? A brother of Christ, the redeemed of the Cross. We need no more. " Just and holy is Thy name, I am all unrighteousness. False and full of sin I am, Thou art full of truth and grace." Ill PERSONAL COMMUNION WITH GOD And the Lord spake unto Moses face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend. — Exodus xxxiii. ii. IN this narrative of old time, and particularly in the sentence which forms our text, there is something which is puzzling to the practical Englishman and to the twentieth-century mind. We are nowadays so literal and exact in our statement of truth, and so little tolerant of the too liberal use of metaphor and symbol, that we are apt to hesitate before expressions of spirit- ual experience which are conveyed in a mental and spiritual dialect different from our own. More- over, we are impatient of views of the Divine nature which would tend to localise, humanise, or limit God, So far is this the case that even the crude and exag- gerated statement of the Godhead of Jesus becomes a serious obstacle to many otherwise religious minds. Hence it is that in reading a narrative like this of the converse which Moses held with God in the taber- nacle in the wilderness we are hindered rather than helped by the anthropomorphism — that is, the man- likeness — of the aspect under which the Deity is pre- sented to our minds. We ask ourselves. Did Moses speak with God face to face ? Did the Lord look with human eyes and speak with human voice to His 33 34 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS servant? Could He do so? Have we here a sudden and unimpressive anticipation of the manger at Bethle- hem and the upper room at Jerusalem? Obviously, it was not so; the Lord dwelleth not in temples made with hands, and the creation cannot contain Him; yet hath the only begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth, declared Him. A sentence or two below our text we read : " No man shall look upon my face and live." " God is a Spirit, and they that worship Him must worship Him in spirit and in truth." Let us dis- miss the difficulty and penetrate at once to the spiritual meaning which underlies these symbolical, mystical words. Moses did speak with God face to face, as all prophets and princes of the Spirit have been (privileged to do; as you and I may, and can, and do. He communed with Him, " solus cum solo," alone with the Great Alone, the Only One, with the only one. He talked with Him " face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend." So spake he, this leader of the host of Israel, with the Friend that sticketh closer than a brother. It was no stranger-God with whom he held converse, but one whom our hearts know and our souls desire, the Fairest among ten thousand, and the Altogether Lovely, who, in after days, declared to His own : " Ye are my friends, if ye do the things which I command you. Henceforth I call you not servants, for the servant knoweth not what his lord doeth, but I have called you friends ; for all things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you." Whether he knew it or not, it was with the Christ — our Christ, the point at which humanity meets Deity, that Moses communed in the tabernacle in the wilderness; just as, in after days, with clearer vision, COMMUNION WITH GOD 36 he communed with Him on the Mount of Transfigura- tion, nigh to Jerusalem. I ask you, therefore, to consider with me, in the light of the New Testament experience, this message of ancient Israel, and we will think about two things : (i) The present-day need of personal communion with God; (2) the method thereof and the blessing there- from. I. It is a remarkable thing that when we are seek- ing for the language of adoration and spiritual feeling we have to go to the Old Testament ; we seek in the phrases of psalmist and prophet the words which ex- press for us — what no words can ever adequately express — the feelings of the soul when aspiring to- wards God. " One thing have I desired of the Lord ; that will I seek after, that I may dwell in the house of the Lord [the home of the Lord], all the days of my life, to behold the beauty of the Lord, and to inquire in His temple ; " " my meditation of Him shall be sweet, and I will be glad in the Lord." Such words as these have been taken, not wrested, from their context, transferred and concentrated upon the feeling the Christian has for Jesus ; and to-day, if we want to say what we experience concerning Him who is the Shep- herd and Bishop of our souls, we turn to the language of ancient Israel, to psalmist and prophet. The very words of our text have a sweeter, tenderer meaning when we think of them, as applied to Christ. The Christian centuries have been marked by experi- ence of the closer relationship existing between the soul and its Maker, as expressed in the language of the Old Testament, but with the high spiritual conscious- ness of the New. 36 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS Let us think of the joy the Christian has in personal communion with the risen and exalted Christ. Eight centuries ago, or nearly, Bernard of Clairvaux wrote : " Jesus ! the very thought of Thee With sweetness fills my breast. But sweeter far Thy face to see, And in Thy presence rest. Jesus, my only joy be Thou, As Thou my prize wilt be ; Jesus, be Thou my glory now And through eternity." No mere sentimentalist was he who wrote those words, but a man at whose word Europe trembled when Europe was wrong; kings and princes con- fessed their sin; the Christian world responded to his prophet-call. St. Francis of Assisi, the Methodist of the thirteenth century, was once watched by one who loved him well that he might learn from his master how to pray, as his master had learnt from Him who taught His dis- ciples in the days of old ; and when he watched with indelicate intrusion, but with a holy intent, this was all he discovered : Over and over again, the saint was saying, with head bowed and hands clasped, the name of Jesus. The great Apostle of the Reformation, moving in stirring times, riding upon the storm, writes to one who knew him well, " I am so busy that I cannot get on without eight hours a day spent in prayer to my Master." Are we to understand that Martin Luther could take eight hours apart from his work? because, if so, the conditions of his busy life were very dissimilar from the conditions of yours. Nothing of the kind. COMMUNION WITH GOD 37 " Work shall be prayer if all be wrought As Thou wouldst have it done, And prayer by Thee inspired and taught Itself with work be one." But there was this dijfference between Luther and some of you: Before his thoughts became purposes, before his purposes became deeds, they were referred to the Master of all ; his communion with Him was sweet ; he spake with Him face to face, as a man speak- eth with his friend ; and, therefore, it was that it might be said of him as it was said of John Knox by the Regent Morton : " He never feared the face of man, so familiar was he with the face of God." Without unduly lengthening these instances, I would remind Methodists of the way in which that mighty movement, early Methodism, achieved its initial tri- umphs. Wesley writes in his journal, " At three in the morning, as we " — a little group who met in an upper room, like that at Jerusalem — " continued in- stant in prayer, the Holy Ghost came mightily upon us, insomuch that, overawed, we fell to the ground. When we had somewhat recovered from the sense of the presence of the Majesty on High, we broke with one accord into the strains of the ' Te Deum,' * We praise, Thee, O God, we acknowledge Thee to be the Lord.' " Thence went Methodism forth, conquering and to conquer. Verily in every century personal communion with God has been held to be the highest privilege of the soul ; so much so that, as " J. B.," of The Christian World, has put it, men have tried by illegitimate means to retain the experience, while failing to fulfil the con- ditions thereof. For, by communion, such as I have 38 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS instanced just now, I am not speaking of prayer only in the sense of petition. Our joy in the presence of our loved and nearest does not spring from the fact that they or we are begging from each other, though we delight to give ourselves to each other. Communion of soul is the only real communion. There is a lan- guage of the eye more eloquent than the language of the lip, and a language of silence more eloquent than either; it is enough to be near, to feel yourself glad- dened in the presence of the loved. And as Fenelon, the great French preacher and mystic, has phrased it for us, so we might say, " Thou art, O Father, so really within ourselves, where we seldom or never look, that Thou art to us a hidden God." We have not arrived at the meaning of life, nor at the possession of our own souls till we have learned what it means to commune with God ; for at one point in experience, as J. H. Newman reminds us, the only realities for the soul, the only realities for any man, are oneself and God. This is the corrective for all that is wrong, fever- ish, agitated, evil, in life ; and this, in the city of Lon- don to-day, and in this congregation, is the greatest and strongest need — whether you are conscious of it or not — that exists for you. We are divine ; you are divine ; your divinity will only find itself in contact with Deity. The soul is not yours to begin with ; it has to be wrought for, gained, and won ; the man who knows nothing of communion with God is a stranger to him- self, and we find ourselves only as we find Him whom our hearts desire. This is an experience greater than any proposition ; it cannot be put into syllogisms ; but it is the most real of all experiences to some who wor- COMMUNION WITH GOD 3» ship here to-day. Our home is in God — in Tenny- sonian phrase — " When that which drew from out the boundless deep Turns again home," and as Sabatier, the great French theologian, has said, " If wearied with the world of pleasure or of toil, I long to find my soul again, and live a deeper life, I can accept no other Guide and Master than Jesus Christ, because in Him alone optimism is without frivolity and seriousness without despair." II. The method of such communion is not far to seek. I am not afraid of a trite observation, or of repeating something that is venerable, when I say. The first essential for busy men is withdrawal from your fellows that you may be alone with God. Into the tabernacle in the wilderness ! Leave the multitude at the tent-door, you will serve them the better when you return. Fathers and mothers, burdened for your children, life means many things to you ; it would be- come simple and glorious and beautiful if you left them sometimes that you might bear them on your hearts to God. " Oh, what peace we often forfeit, Oh, what needless pain we bear! All because we do not carry Everything to God in prayer." Here are you, City men, snatching an hour or half an hour in the middle of the day to worship God. Why are you going back again to toil ? It is because of those represented here, but not amongst us — the wife and the little ones at home. You are not fighting for your own hand. Neither was that man who cheated 40 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS _you this morning ; pity him, if it were so. I never yet met a man who was not playing to an audience, how- ever small. You are caring for somebody, that is why you toil ; you are labouring and suffering, not for yourself; life would be dreary to-morrow, if they were gone. You live in the being of another or others. They were God's before they were yours ; those whom He has given you He could care for Himself without you. Would you learn how to serve? Leave them and be alone with God. " Haven't the time ! " You have ; you have time for many things ; time to commune ; lis- ten to the voice of the Eternal. Time ? — there is time in Cheapside to command audience of heaven. Time? — why, you are always alone, even in your busiest hour. Make a sanctuary outside the City Temple, in the midst of your fellows, in the heart of your business, speak with God in the tabernacle, face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend. The other condition of your communion is openness to God. Cease from the prayer of agonised entreaty; that has its place; wait for the speech of God. Our fathers knew all about this. I saw on the service paper last week that the City Temple is the oldest Congre- gational church in London. It dates from 1640. Do you know what was the type of religious life then? We could criticise it ; it was very grim ; in some cases it was very hard, perhaps it was too self-sufficient. But •no man waited then for his neighbour to tell him about the preciousness of God ; he knew. That was the day of the high-backed pew, when a man came to church not to look at anybody, but to speak with God. That experience was real ; it made such men as conquered at Marston Moor and sent the Royalists to confusion COMMUNION WITH GOD 41 at Naseby. They were not less men than you ; there was no effeminacy in the Puritan. Now, in this day of conventions, and demonstrations, and congresses, and what not, we commune with each other rather than with God, and we lose because we do not know what it is — am I exaggerating? — in the same degree to be alone with the Maker of us all. There is prayer which is stillness, susceptibility to the Eternal, a heart ready for the impulses brought by the Spirit of God. " And when in silent awe we wait And word and sign forbear, The hinges of the golden gate Move, soundless, to our prayer." That is the time of vision. Would you see what the needs of the world are, that you may have opportunity to remedy them? See in the stillness, see in the soli- tude, see in the holy place, the multitudes waiting with- out the tent door for the Prophet, Master, and Leader to return, " Our deepest feelings are precisely those we are least able to express, and even in the act of adoration silence is our highest praise." Then comes the blessing. The still, small voice that speaks within needs no apologist; you know it when you hear it. There is a sweet comfort and a shining peace in the holy place with Jesus. Well do I know the exceptions to this great state- ment. It is not always easy to pray. Sometimes you will be overwhelmed in the black waters of sorrow, and feel as if utterance were denied you, and you cannot pray. Say so to the living God. I have here some words that I copied for you, written by a fourteenth- century mystic, who would not recognise the Citv of to-day, and yet they were written not far from the 42 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS City : " Pray inwardly " — from within — " though thou thinkest it savour thee not; for it is profitable though thou feel not, though thou see naught, yea, though thou thinkest thou canst not ; for in dryness, in barrenness, in sickness, in feebleness, then is thy prayer well pleasant unto Me — and I am Jesus." When I am thinking I am listening, and the voice that speaks to me is the voice that spake by the Lake of Galilee — the same, and not another; and the Christ who spake to our fathers, the Christ in whose name we are gathered here, the same Christ it is who speaks within your own soul now. Cease from your restlessness, give Him a hearing; He preaches His own sermons, brings His own message; keeps with His own power those whom the Father has given unto Him. Hear me, you who are strong, and true, and brave, but who do not commune : you are missing something. Begin even now ; leave the rest of us and cleave to God. Be your problem what it may, you are insufficient for it ; for even though you do not pray, God remembers and saves, but when you do the whole world is different, the light is upon it that never was on sea or land. Hear me, you who are sunken in despair, you who are in chains and bondage to propensity or shame : speak not to me concerning this. The arm of flesh will fail you ; you dare not trust another's, much less your own. Go right to the Fountain of all that is good ; speak to the Eternal, who is the source of everything that is holy, and tender, and true ; learn to love by learning to pray. " Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty ; " " and we all with unveiled face, be- holding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory unto glory as by the Spirit of the Lord." IV CAN GOD ANSWER PRAYER? If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children, how much more shall your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask Him ? — Luke xi. ij. This is the confidence that we have in Him, that, if we ask anything according to His will. He heareth us ; attd if lue know that He heareth us, whatsoever we ask, we know that we have the petitions that we desired of Him. — I fohn V. I4-IS- THE subject of prayer is one of never-fail- ing interest to human-kind. For all men pray at some time or other, whether fitfully or constantly, in weakness or in strength, in sorrow or in joy. Some men pray because it is their chiefest delight so to do, and some pray because necessity drives them to it; but they all pray. Prayer is a constant element, and the impulse to pray is ever present to human nature. The ques- tion is not. Shall we pray ? but, Can God hear us when ■we do; is there room for Him to answer; is it any use to pray? To this question our texts — the one on the authority of Jesus Christ, and the other the testimony of Christian experience — supply the answer. The former, remember, is the simple, but very direct and unequivocal, declaration, " If ye then, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children, how much more shall your heavenly Father give " — that which includes and is present in every good gift — " the Holy 43 44 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS Spirit to them that ask Him ? " And the testimony of Christian experience, the experience of a man who had heard these words spoken, and Hved upon the strength of them, is this, " This is the confidence that we have in Him " — in Christ, as you will see by the context — " that, if we ask anything according to His will, He heareth us ; and if we know that He heareth us, what- soever we ask, we know that we have the petitions that we desired of Him." Some things are very striking about the New Testa- ment teaching on the subject of prayer, but none of them is more striking than this, and the more I ponder the matter the more remarkable it seems to me — the fewness of the conditions attached to the prayer that compels answer from God. New Testament teaching, especially the words of Jesus, are perfectly direct, simple, and emphatic about this. Further, our Lord never hesitates in His teaching about prayer to apply the anthropomorphic argument. He illustrates the doings of God from the best we know of men, and when we have said all we can say upon the subject of prayer, we shall just have come back to the words of our Lord, " If ye," — any of you that is a father — " give, then how much more your heavenly Father, from whom cometh every good and every perfect gift." Moreover, I observe, and it is very striking when you think of it, that our Lord does not illustrate the doings of the Father of our spirits in the best man, otherwise His argument might have run thus : " Look at me, see how kind I am and how good ; the Father is as good as I ; He will do for you the things I am trying to do." But His argument was drawn from the ex- perience of any man. Looking upon those who, im- CAN GOD ANSWER PRAYER? 45 perfect as they were, represented, perhaps, the best that Jewish society produced at the time, but yet im- perfect, struggHng, faiHng, falHng men, He said, " If ye," any of you, " being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children, how much more your heavenly Father ! " The argument seems to me to gain strength indeed ; for if our Lord were here at this moment, He would select any man in this congregation and make him His illustration and His proof of the goodness of God. He would say. Are you capable of pity? then God is not worse than you. Are you capable of kind- ness to your child ? God's love must be greater than yours, for it produced you. Are you capable of taking delight in answering prayer? why, you are doing it every day; that is what you are in the City for, in order that you may have the wherewith to answer the prayers that will meet you when you get home. If you, any of you, bad or good, know how to give good gifts unto those whom you love, how much more your Father which is in heaven. Robert Browning has very beautifully expressed this in one of his best- known poems : •' Do I find love so full in my nature, God's ultimate gift, That I doubt His own love can compete with it ? Here, the pai'ts shift ? Here, the creature surpass the Creator — the end, what began ? I believe it ! 'Tis Thou, God, that givest, 'tis I who receive ; In the first is the last, in Thy will is my power to believe. All's one gift ; Thou canst grant it, moreover, as prompt to my prayer As I breathe out this breath, as I open these arms to the air." What is prayer? Not everything that receives that 46 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS name is really prayer. Most, if not all, of you have read Victor Hugo's " Notre Dame," and you may remember that terribly realistic last chapter — a faithful picture, I fear, of mediaevalism at its worst — and the introduction of the figure of Louis XL and of the poor girl who is being done to death by wicked men. Ac- cused of being a witch, the poor, simple girl takes refuge in a cathedral, and Louis — religious, crafty, superstitious, villainous, vicious, unscrupulous — prays, ere the sin is committed, for forgiveness, that he may take the girl from the sanctuary and drag her to a death of agony and shame. He manages to convince himself that forgiveness is accorded before the deed is done. He would have called it prayer. What Avould you call it? That petition came from the hell to which its fruits returned ; it damned the man who prayed it, not the poor girl against whom it was prayed. You need no further illustration as to what is not prayer. What is? Prayer is that in which the soul looks up ; it must be the expression of nobleness in the man who prays. You stand upon the tableland of character when you pray. It is the utterance of the soul's highest to God, and He will be content with nothing less. You have reached to the limit of capacity when you have called to God; the best that is in you appeals to High Heaven when you pray. Prayer, said William Law, is the nearest approach unto God and the highest enjoyment of Him that we can have in this world. " Prayer is the Christian's vital breath, The Christian's native air, His watchword at the sfates of death, He enters heaven by prayer." CAN GOD ANSWER PRAYER? 47 Prayer is all this. Is it anything else ? Yes ; prayer is a demand note addressed to Heaven, prayer is the human will moving the arm of God, prayer is grasp- ing the power unseen and bringing it down to work great things in the seen. Prayer is human goodness transcending its limitations and bringing down the will- ing aid of the willing Father in human things. But, says someone, you have trenched now upon a difficult subject, and made a very dangerous statement. Is it reasonable to believe in such prayer as that? Is not this compelling the Arbiter of our destinies to abdicate ? I admit the difficulty, and answer it thus : First, it is a matter of simple experience that, law or no law, difficulty or no difficulty, prayer does move the arm of God. Here kneels George Miiller, praying for a breakfast for a thousand and more orphans, and it comes ; here is a life's record in. which a man prayed a solid million into existence, without asking a man for a penny. That is evidence as well worth consideration as the law by which an apple falls to the ground. Here is C. H. Spurgeon kneeling at the end of his financial year to tell God about the difficulties that had to be met and the record that has to be placed to his credit. That man, who Hved a life of prayer, and was a prince of the Gospel, if ever there was one, would have said at the last moment, if asked for his testimony, " Good- ness and mercy have followed me all the days of my life. God has never failed when I have called upon Him." The witness of holiness is worth investigation. What is holiness? I wish I could tell you the differ- ence between holiness and nobleness. It does not mean that the one excludes the other, but it is the dif- 48 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS ference between the diamond and the carbon. Nobody can tell us what makes a carbon a diamond. The same substances are in both, combined in exactly the same proportions, but the one will shine in the dark and the other will not. We cannot sec what makes the dif- ference, except that the diamond, which is a carbon after all, has managed to feed upon the light somehow, and store it, and shine by its lustre. Holiness is character, the shining light that never was on sea or land ; holiness is character with a fragrance ; holiness is an influence of itself, and it is begotten of communion with the Unseen, and without that you never have it, and no man has ever had it. When you speak about the men you know in business life who are living wel) and nobly without any particular faith in God, with nothing more than a faith in right, you know, as wel' as I know, and as well as they know, too, that if yot place a Spurgeon and a Catherine Booth alongside them, the difference is that of the diamond and of the carbon, and the difference is made by prayer. The one is mighty in communion with the Unseen, and the other is not. The witness of holiness to the efficacy of prayer is this, that no saint ever prayed and doubted about his answer; if it came not in one way, it came in another. Unvarying, unaltering is the witness of holiness to the fact that God does hear prayer, however it is done. Secondly, moral freedom and answered prayer in- volve each other. The one factor of uncertainty in the whole scheme of things of which you are a part, is human will. Philosophers may say what they please, but you never get the ordinary man to believe that he has not some power of control over his own destiny. You came from a business house just now, where you CAN GOD ANSWER PRAYER? 49 were engaged in altercation with a man, blaming him for a dirty trick. You know that he need not have done it ; he knows it, too. You come into the presence of one whose face reminds you of a noble and unselfish act, and you think, I wish I were like him. He need not have been what he is ; it is grand that he chose the higher. You would never get men to believe that the world is so colourless, so automatic, that men have no power of self-direction and self-control. This power may be much more limited than you think. I am pre- pared to conclude that in many instances moral respon- sibility is not so great as the bystanders imagine ; but it is always there, however small the circle within which it is exercised. A man remains a man with the God-like faculty of willing the right and avoiding the wrong. Once you have admitted that factor of tmcer- tainty, which experience always testifies to, you have admitted the possibility, nay, the imperative probability, of answer to prayer. For if you can take the helm out of the hands of God, you can put it back ; if you are free to do wrong, you are free to pray, " God be merci- ful to me a sinner " ; if you are free to exercise in- fluence over any man, you are free to pray to the Giver of the awful gift that He would help you in the exercise thereof. If you are free as a spirit to commune with the Father of spirits, you are free to transcend law. For what is law but your experience of the dependable- ness of God? We talk as if law was something inex- orable and to be afraid of. Law presumes the Law- giver ; it is personalitv at the back, a consistent God who ordains the things upon which vou can depend. Under the uniformitv of nature there exists an inex- haustible variety. No flower will ever grow in the 50 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS isame spot as another ; you never have two leaves in the vegetable world alike. Under the operation of law, unceasing as it is, God is making a differentiation all the time. Your life is different from that of the man who sits next to you, and though there be a Divinity that shapes your ends, rough-hew them how you will, there is power left for you to refer thought, act, and purpose back to God, who gave you the power of self-direction and self-control. Prayer is the reinforcement of human endeavour ; it is not the substitute for it. Prayer is the enlargement of your personality ; prayer is working on power from the unseen — mighty are those who know how to bring it. It is said that the presence of Napoleon on the field of battle was equivalent to a reinforcement of 40,000 men. Why? Because he so increased the fighting value of every separate man, that his mere presence was equivalent to another army. Prayer will do that for you. The man of prayer is the best kind of man. The man who can go to God when he has done his own best is drawing what the natural man cannot have. The spiritual man is the man of power, because he is the man of prayer. The latest of fads in the semi-religious world is that which, under various titles, is most commonly de- scribed as " Christian Science." The vogue which this fad has is a rebuke to me and to other preachers of the Gospel. For the only moiety of truth that it contains is the purest Christianity. It tells you of the possibility of a victorious life, a life of victory over ill and suffering, danger and fear; and its votaries say that what is required from those who would be Chris- tian Scientists is power to call and power to trust; in CAN GOD ANSWER PRAYER? 61 tunc with the Infinite must you be; those who are in tune with the Infinite are masters of their destiny, never the victims of fate. Is that new in the history of the world? It was taught upon the hillside of Galilee nineteen hundred years ago by Him who spake as never man spake ; it was taught by John the Be- loved, in the words of our text. If we ask anything according to His will, He heareth, and if we know that He heareth, we know that we have conquered. Let there be no mistake about the power which comes into a man's life if he has the gift of prayer. " Oh, what peace we often forfeit, Oh, what needless pain we bear ! All because we do not carry Everything to God in prayer," I have often said that if I can get a man to pray, not now and then, but as the habit of his life, I have been the means of saving him. He will be strong, instead of weak ; instead of leaning for help upon his fellows, he will be their benefactor and the ambassador of the Unseen. Get a man to pray, and you have made him strong, you have given him faith, you have made him climb ; get a man to pray, and the Holy Spirit will shine through him, and the world will be better because he lives. There no true prayer without its answer. This may seem a great deal to say, but I would like every young man to remember that point, if he remembers no other. Louis XL did not pray, but that man did who said, " O God, if there be a God, save my soul, if I have a soul." He looked up, and he stood at his highest ; that prayer set heaven in motion. Prayer is just willing Godward. The answer to prayer begins at the moment when you 62 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS begin to pray. Somebody prayed this morning a prayer that the preacher did not pray ; perhaps nobody prayed it but himself ; he does not want to publish what it was, it is of great importance to him, and to him only. Perhaps it was a prayer of wounded love, tlie cry of a broken heart and of ill-requited affection. It went right to the heart of the Eternal ; it was worthy to go. You may have to wait a long time before you see any fruit of it, but that prayer was as the prayer of omnipotence. You took hold, as Christ would take hold, of the hand of the Father, and what is to be in response to the petition has begun now. Will you who are tempted, who have been fighting a battle with the beast within you, who know what it is to contend against fearful odds in a world of extremes, of light and darkness, sorrow and joy, who feel as if you are being overborne in the battle of life, think of this : Every cry that goes Godward brings its immediate response to the perturbed and anxious heart. For there is always an immediate as well as a deferred answer to prayer. Some prayers are answered quickly, some slowly. All are answered more grandly than the scope of the petition itself, but there is never a failure, and if you can only learn that it is so, there will be no prayer that you will ever pray of which you will not be conscious that God has spoken in the moment of your prayer. It is God's will that you should use yours ; it is God's delight to hear you pray. Have you ever gone into the presence of God when you felt as if you could not speak to anybody, as if the world was too black, your confidence in yourself too feeble, that the first thing to do was to get alone somewhere, and speak your thoughts, desires, and anxieties, to the great CAN GOD ANSWER PRAYER? 53 Friend, the living, loving, helpful One whom eyes cannot see, but whose presence we feel ? How did you come out of that presence-chamber ? Changed, I war- rant; not because circumstances had changed, but be- cause peace had stolen into your heart, and you felt that " God's in His heaven All's right with the world." It was as though a mother had picked up her little child, and soothed its disquiet, and bidden it be still, and promised nothing, but in the love had given all. Just to know Him and to feel Him near is to have all your prayers ansv/ered before the answer to one of them has come. Some of you are thinking, maybe, less about yourselves than about those whom God has placed near you, and you may say, " I know of a prayer that was not answered ; I remember praying long ago about that wife, that boy of mine whom it would seem as if nothing could save ; I wrestled in agony with God, and the only answer was death." Maybe that was the answer. Sometimes we seem unequal to the task of caring for those whom God has placed under our care, and we tell Him so. Perhaps the answer is that He takes them home, cares for them Himself, and when we stand upon the other side of death we shall see what it all means. " We kneel — how weak ! We rise — how full of power! Why therefore should we do ourselves this wrong, Or others — that we are not always strong, That we are ever overborne with care, That we should ever weak or heartless be, Anxious or troubled, when with us is orayer. And joy and strength and courage are with Thee ? " SUPPOSING CHRIST WERE ONLY A MAN Pilate saith unto them. Behold the man ! ^John xix. 5. WHY did Pilate say, " Behold the man ! " ? Let us see. For the first time in his experience, doubtless, the Roman Governor hesitated about the crucifixion of a helpless victim of popular fury. Pilate's chief inducement, one would have thought, would have been to please the Jews, win their approval by crucifying one who was evidently the object of their bitter hatred. Yet he hesitated almost up to the point when the mob would have turned upon him and wrested from him the sceptre, or reported him to his dread and jealous lord, the Csesar, gloomily waiting in imperial Rome. Yet he hesitated, for he had never looked on a prisoner like this one, helpless in his hands, without weapon to defend himself, without friend to speak for him ; Pilate felt that he had changed places with his prisoner; he was upon his trial, and this kingly man was his judge. He had never looked upon such a man. Even in his hour of shame and agony the Christ, the victim of the hatred of the people he came to save, towered above them in majesty, and compelled the reluctant admiring homage of this master of legions himself. " Art thou a king?" he said; and the Christ, penetrating to the 54 ONLYAMAN 65 impulse which made him ask the question, returned, " Thou sayest it because I am a king." In effect, the Master was saying : You can see in your prisoner of to- day, with this purple robe, this crown of thorns, a Master who, though esteemed not of this world, is a man as never was before ; never have you looked upon a man like this : thou sayest it because thou seest that I am a king. Keeping closely to the natural and instinctive feeling of this man who looked upon Jesus for the first time, let me introduce you to the most pressing religious question of to-day. All religious controversy seems for the moment to have concentrated upon one sacred head. The question of questions at the present hour is : Who was and is Jesus Christ ? I am proud and glad to think that so many men come with open minds to listen to that question who do not ordinarily frequent the courts of the Lord. Some of you think you have made up your mind upon the question, and that, in doing so you have dethroned the Master from the place where superstition has placed Him. You will have to come back again and reopen the question. " Behold the man ! " and then tell me what you think of the Christ. Some of you feel the difficulty of accounting for the Master while retaining the halo of the supernatural around His head. One sometimes hears men say, " How easy it would be to account for Jesus, yea, and to render Him the first place in the estimation of man- kind, if only we could strip away from Him all the adjuncts of a false and mistaken piety ; if we could say, Here is a man, but only a man, one of ourselves, a great and a good, but still only a man." There is a difficulty 56 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS felt about the dual personality. Sometimes one hears a young fellow say : " How could this man pray to God and be God ; exhort Himself, call upon Himself, love, trust, and adore Himself? H Jesus and the Father were one, how are we to account for the personality of Jesus Himself? for that also appears to be one." True. Another difficulty is presented : " Would it not be easier to say that Jesus of Nazareth, the victim of Jewish hate, ran the course that all goodness does in this world ? men crucify their prophets. Did not Jesus die a martyr to the beautiful testimony He bore to the goodness of our Father in heaven ? was not His gospel the occasion of His death? and at the last did not He, in common with all the suffering sons of men, the best as well as the worst, cry in agony from the Cross of Calvary : ' My God, my God ! why hast Thou forsaken Me?' Is it not true that His bones are mouldering into dust in Palestine to-day, "And on his grave, with shining eyes. The Syrian stars look down " ? Oh, simplify the matter at once, and let us say, Here was a man, the greatest of men, the noblest of men, the purest of men, one who has given us vision of God, but still only a man." Wait a little. What is a man? Let us settle that question first. The difference between man and man is all but infinite. The difference between a Robespierre and a Cromwell, for example, in moral stature. Is im- measurable. The dififcrence between a Charles Peace and a Charles Spurgcon cannot be expressed as com- parison, only as contrast. The difference between a Voltaire and a Wesley is all but infinite. " Only a ONLY A MAN 57 man " — but it makes a great difference which man. " Only a man " — suppose it was Gladstone ; no build- ing in this land or in any other land would hold the people who would flock to see him and love and adore. Some men stand far above their fellows ; you cannot thir.k of them without looking up; their humanity towers up and up until it is lost in divinity and in- distinguishable therefrom. " Only a man "? I will paint you a picture which is perfectly true. Not far from these doors, so Hall Caine tells us, there are gambling hells and drinking dens — clubs they call them, of one kind and another — where degraded men, like harpies, like devils, are prey- ing upon their kind, luring the youth of both sexes to destruction, and doing it for gain, selling others, body and soul, and damning their own in the process. " Only a man " — but a man that does that is a devil. Again : Into one such den on a certain dark night there went another man, and by main force of his sanctified personality he drew out of that foul and reeking sink of iniquity one and another — a man, a woman ; gave them back their manhood and their womanhood, and drew them to the God whom their life had denied. That man died, after a life spent in saving; he died because, some wise people tell us, he had worked too hard to better the lot of humanity ; he died because his rescue work had killed him. Now we speak of him as a saint. Thousands followed him to the tomb ; on the day when he was laid to rest it was impossible almost for all those who wished to pay tribute to his memory to obtain access to the graveside. Amongst the company that stood there was one poor woman, who asked permission to lay a bunch of violets on his 58 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS coffin. He was " only a man," but to her he was a man of men; he had saved her from a fate that was worse than death ; she associated him with the best she knew of heaven and of God. That woman is Hving; that man is dead. Can he die ? " Only a man " — but that man was Hugh Price Hughes. " Only a man." Man is a fragment of divinity, and he never can forfeit his origin. " Only a man " — but we must take each man at his real value. How much of God does a man contain ? That is the way in which to measure his humanity. " Only a man " — may he never cease to be a man, too, when his manhood towers up and up till it touches God, and reveals God. We are mistaken when we try to draw any line between that humanity and the God that created it. Moreover, manhood overlaps. None of us liveth to himself, nor can, even if he wants to. You are the trustee, not only of your own life, but of other lives. When you re- fuse to serve, you are serving all the same, causes bad or good. When you are standing for the wrong you are struggling against the right, and lives you never saw are the worse for the life you are living. Every man sends the roots of his being deep into the total life of humanity. Here are we, a great company, rep- resentatives of all humanity that has ever been or ever lived. What I say of the congregation as a whole, I say of the weakest and the least influential man in it. In a sense, all humanity has come to a focus in you ; in a sense, God has spoken to humanity through what you are. We cannot cover much of the territory of another man's being, but we cover some, and you measure the greatness of a man's manhood by the amount that he is able to do for lives other than his ONLYAMAN 69 own. How much of God have you brought to bear upon the total life of humanity? Now, judged by the standard that we have been raising, how much of God did Mr. Gladstone bring into the life of England? " Only a man " — but I do not wish to separate him from what I know of God. How much did Mr. Spur- geon bring, how much did Dr. Parker bring, how much did Hugh Price Hughes bring ? " Only a man " — cease talking about mankind as though it were some- thing different from Deity. The difference between man and God is a difference not in kind, but in moral height. From the side of God there is no line drawn between humanity and Deity at all. Now this will help you when you come to deal with such questions as that now before us. Jesus is only a man, but He is the Man of men ; Jesus has enfolded humanity. His is the only life that you can say covers the whole territory of humanity. None other could have spoken as Jesus did without blasphemy. He stood for God when He looked at men, and those who stood nearest to Him were compelled involuntarily to ask themselves : " What manner of man is this ? Never man spake like this man ; He has the words of eternal life." We have read in our lesson this morn- ing of the feeling with which the disciples, even him whom we are accustomed to call the doubter, regarded One whom they addressed as Master and Lord. Do you think that the disciples who first saw Christ thought of Him as you and I think of Him to-day? Nothing of the sort. Their creed was never imposed from without, it sprang from within. Before ever Church Councils were heard of, disciples were putting into life and practice what they knew of God through 60 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS Jesus Christ. " Master and Lord," they called Him. " Ye say well, for so I am," He replied. " Master and Lord," but " only a man." " Shew us the Father, and we shall be satisfied." " I and My Father are one." The vision of God which Jesus brought to these men in the upper room, which changed all their life, their history, their character, their conduct, holds for all time. The worst man as well as the best recognises it. When you think of God you are really thinking of the character of Jesus enthroned at the heart of the uni- verse. You never can dissociate the two. All you know or think you know of the Father you have seen in looking into the face of the Son. Put theology from you ; let the Man stand for his full value as you draw it from the New Testament ; and when you have asked yourself the question, "What think ye of Christ?" can it be that you can answer in any other terms than those of the doubter when he saw Him again — the very same, the Jesus of Galilee, " My Lord and my God " ? The humanity of Christ rises up — ^not that He had to climb there, He was there — until it becomes Deity to us, and we cannot, if we would, separate our conception of the humanity of Christ from our con- fidence in His Godhead. This is a matter of simple, every-day experience. Let me state it in another way. Supposing you had never heard of such a man as Christ, reigning for and through and over humanity, humanity would be asking for Him to-day. This is exactly what you are looking for. We have never seen a Man but once. I have seen many attempts at manhood, but I have never seen a Man save in the New Testament. " Behold the ONLYAMAN 61 man " — the only one. When I have said that, Hke Thomas, I have cried out, " My Lord and my God." Fulness of the stature of manhood brings me God, all the God I am capable of receiving, and still the Christ, who is the Humanity of God, is looking up into the face of the Father. To all eternity it must be so. Down with your metaphysics, lift the devotion of the heart — our Man to all eternity, our King, our Master, our Gate- way into God, our God. That this has been echoed in all experience when it has reached its highest needs no proof. Now I want to make an appeal on the strength of it. There are men in this church who think less of Christ than I do; and the reason we are here this morning is to try to make you think as we do. Supposing Pilate and Thomas could have met and joined hands, and Pilate in a moment of penitence could have said : " I have by my cowardice slain a man, the grandest man I ever saw." And Thomas could have answered : " True, you did, and I loved that man, loved him so that I wanted to go and die with Him, but I deserted Him and fled in His moment of need. We are both criminals, Pilate, you and I; let us join hands. I have discovered something for you, I have seen Him ; He is my Lord and my God. He and He only it is who is the answer to my need and the Saviour from my sin." There was a new experience bom then; the perfect humanity was discovered that redeemed ours. ** If Jesus Christ is a man. And only a man, I say. That of all mankind I cleave to Him, And to Him will I cleave alway. 62 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS " But if Jesus Christ is God, And the only God, I swear, I will follow Him through heaven and hell, The earth, the sea, and the air." For that Saviour has never failed mankind. The ex- perience that was born in the upper room, in the ejacu- lation compelled from the breast of a man who loved and thought he had lost his Lord, has never failed humanity since, has never been absent. Observe that the greatest holiness, the grandest nobleness, the sub- limest achievement of humanity at its best, has been associated with that view of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. We are asking daily for a Saviour, in sin and in sor- row, and in human problems and in human need, and the Christ who, nineteen hundred years ago, was so precious to men has still power to compel the adoration and trust and love as none of the sons of men has ever done or can do. " Only a man." Now, put Gladstone beside this Man ; put Hugh Price Hughes beside this Man ; put Charles Haddon Spurgeon beside this Man, and Joseph Parker in his dying moment beside this Man, and lis- ten what they have to tell you. The first-named preacher, dying, said : " Put on my coffin, ' Thou, O Christ, art all I want.' " And the last said : " My love to my Jesus all the time." Galilee does not hold Him now, nor can ; and no tomb was ever invented that could enclose the Christ, and death could not enchain Him. He lives. Because He lives humanity shall never die. It is pleading at the throne of God. " The healing of His seamless dress Is by our beds of pain ; ONLY A MAN 63 We touch Him in life's throng and press, And we are whole again. " Through Him the first fond prayers are said, Our lips of childhood frame ; The last low whispers of our dead Are burdened with His name. " We may not climb the heavenly steeps To bring the Lord Christ down ; In vain we search the lowest deeps, For Him no depths can drown ; *' But warm, sweet, tender, even yet, A present help is He, And faith has still its Olivet And love its Galilee." Here is a stupendous fact, never to be explained away. For this Jesus in whom we trust conquers. Come, you who don't beHeve in Him, is it Jesus? If not, who is it? If we are believing in a lie that still conquers, that makes men holy, but a lie all the same — then God help us; for the whole universe is wrong. But it is not wrong. " Behold the Man that sitteth upon the throne." VI GOD'S REMEDY FOR SIN He hath made Him to be sin for us, who knew no sin ; that we tnight be made the righteousness of God in Him. — 2 Cor. V. 21. ET us attempt a retranslation and a paraphrase of that passage. The translation first, and following the order of the clauses in the Greek — " Him who knew no sin, He made to be sin in our behalf, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him." The text gains a little in clearness of statement and in force by this way of arranging its clause and the substitution of words. Now the paraphrase : " By the will of God, Christ can so deal with human sin that the responsi- bility for it can as it were be transferred from us to Him, and that we, being freed from the burden of guilt, may rise into the righteousness of God, which is already His." That is a stupendous thing to say. If my reading of the text be right, we are justified in saying that in these few words we have a complete statement of the Christian doctrine of atonement. I know of no other sentence on the same subject in the New Testament which says so much in so few words as this wonderful sentence written from the experience of St. Paul. I am well aware that this passage, and kindred passages dealing with this subject in the New 04 GOD'S REMEDY FOR SIN 65 Testament, are a standing difficulty to many minds, religious and non-religious, both in the pew and in the pulpit. I have known preachers to say that they felt a great difficulty in preaching the Atone- ment, because they were not able to find a place for it in their own experience, and I remember once being told by a brother minister about a layman (permit the word) of high character and influence in the Church, who said to him, after a sermon on the doctrine of the Atonement, " I wish I could go with you in what you have said, but I do not really feel that I need a doc- trine of Atonement ; I have tried to live for the greater part of my days as well as I knew how, I have dealt justly with my fellows, and I think I love Jesus Christ, who is Lord of All, but I would love Him just as much if you never preached any doctrine of Atone- ment at all, and really it has no significance for me." Probably you will think that the speaker must have been in type a Pharisee. He was not. He was a good man. I have known many to say, " I admire the Christian ethic. It stands first, it appeals to the human conscience, it is the ideal for individual manhood; but this doctrine is not ethical, and it is not reasonable. In fact, it is immoral to ask any other being to bear my sins." If there be any persons here of this way of thinking, my words are not, in the first place, intended for you, and yet I should wish them to appeal to you, too. They are intended for those who are conscious that nothing but the Christian evangel of the Atonement can reach their experience, and what I should like the rest of you to do is to arrange yourselves alongside the sinner, and try to see with his eyes and feel with his heart; then 00 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS see whether there be not something in the Gospel of the Cross of Christ that you never saw before. I am speaking to those^ then, who are conscious of moral failure when I say this — that the Atonanent, in a very real sense, is the whole of Christianity. Take it away and you have nothing left, no Gospel and no evangel. This is a strong statement, and requires justification. You shall have it. To begin with, it is often said that, nowadays, men do not appear to exhibit the sense of sin as they did in an earlier day. We read about the thousands who flocked to hear the fiery eloquence of George White- field, and we are told that with strong crying and tears they entered the kingdom of God, convinced that His message of the Saviourhood of Christ, the atonement wrought by Him, was the first and most necessary thing for every man who would enter into eternal life. Some of you are old enough to remember when Mr. Spurgeon first came preaching in the great metropolis. The same thing took place. If ever there was an un- compromising preacher of the Cross, it was Mr. Spur- geon, and men came in multitudes to that Cross, be- lieving in the Gospel of a crucified Saviour as the first necessity to their spiritual being. Was it not Mr. Glad- stone who said that he noticed since that day a certain decrease in the sense of sin? That humble-minded statesman, grand Christian man as he was, deplored this tendency, and declared that the first thing preach- ; ers of the Gospel ought to address themselves to was the task of awakening the sense of sin. Dr. R. W, Dale said he feared the difference between a past gen- eration and this was largely to be comprised in the fact that men do not now fear God ; they speculate about GOD'S REMEDY FOR SIN CV Him instead. Be this as it may, I am rather indined to question the statement that the sense of sin is feebler than it used to be. Admitting that there are thousands and tens of thousands in London who care nothing at all about religion or Christ, I am perfectly sure I am within the mark when I say that both within and without the Church there are more men with a burning sense of sin than any preacher or all preachers put together will reach within the next week. The sense of sin has changed its mode of expression ; but it is not gone ; it is real and burning, and the need to which it gives rise is as great as ever. Let me try to illustrate. There sits in the City Tem- ple this morning a man of high repute, perhaps, in the metropolis ; he has everything that this world can give him, humanly speaking. He is rolling in wealth, he is a man of great personal influence, with power over the bodies and minds of men. You call him fortunate, perhaps you envy him a little ; there may be some here who would wish to change places with him. Do not wish it any more. He is suffering the tortures of hell, and this is the reason why. Years ago, when he was first climbing to success, he married a young wife, who loved him above all else in this world, and he was will- ing to give her everything in return but kindness. He treated her cruelly, brutally, with that coldness which is worse than hate ; he broke her heart and he killed her. Now he is drawing towards the evening of Ufe, when he has obtained everything he ever tried for, he finds how little it is worth, and he wishes that the tender grace of a day that is dead might come back again to him. That man is as much a murderer as any criminal who was executed in England this week. Pity 68 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS him; do not denounce. The horror of the situation is this : Whether there be any Gospel, any Christ, any God, or no, he is doomed to torture until the grave closes over him. Conscience has told him something, and nothing will rid him from that dread enemy. What do you make of that ? You may give it what name you please, but it is the sense of sin, even though it be awakened by only one dread fact in the past life. Sin is not only a Bible word, not only a pulpit word ; it is a newspaper word, a Stock Exchange word, a Fleet Street word, and the thing for which it stands is a very present experience in the life of every man and woman. You know, without preachers, what it is to suffer because of sin — your own or other people's. Now, take another instance. Here is a man whose lot of life is so different from him whom I have de- scribed that there can be no comparison between them ; there can only be contrast. This man started life high in the social scale. He has come down, and done it by his own fault. He has flung away his opportunities; He has destroyed the peace of those who loved him best. It may be that he has broken his mother's heart, and brought down his father's grey hairs in sorrow to the grave. Mark him as he sits near you, shabbily dressed, unkempt, hopeless-looking, the fire in his eye dimmed, his manhood gone. H you were to talk to such a man about sin, he might be impatient, but if you tell him that he has made his bed, and must lie on it, he will bow his head in shame, for he knows that it is true. What do you call that? If there never were a preacher of the Gospel, there is something worth preaching to in that man. Close by him is another. You have pitied the poor GOD'S REMEDY FOR SIN 09 unfortunate ; here is one whom you may pity more. He is cursed with success, in that the foundation of that success was laid in falsehood. Years ago he got his first opportunity by telling a black lie; he has suc- ceeded, but if he could^ just put the clock back, and start again, he would give you all his success. You would be welcome to it, but he cannot get rid of the success. Other people are concerned beside him. He would not care to publish to the world — and it would be no use to publish — what he was and what he is. He keeps away from churches, and he has nothing to do with religion, for he won't play the hypocrite. He feels perfectly helpless. That which is done is done, that which is written is written, and he is a miserable man to-day. With another instance, I cease illustration, for my point is almost complete. There is another here who fights a battle with a propensity the very existence of which is humiliation. He won a victory this morning over his Apollyon, but he knows that to-morrow morn- ing the battle has to be fought over again. He is wrestling with a demon the existence of which none of his friends suspect. Oh, pity the man with a foul and secret sin ! He knows what it is to be wretched, and his cry of despairing agony sometimes rises up to a seem- ingly silent heaven. Is there any help for such as he ? All these things may exist. In every case it is the sense of sin, without much thought of God. This is a re- markable thing, but it is true. Men can be tortured by conscience without thinking whence conscience comes ; and, yet, when they do associate it with the thought of God, they become at first more dreadful, and after- wards more hopeful. When they say, as poor David 70 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS said after his great fall, " Against Thee, and Thee only, have I sinned," there, though perhaps they suspect it not, is the first dawning of deliverance. Dr. Parker, in his pulpit, once gave, in his dramatic fashion, a description of sin that I have never heard equalled — it makes one shiver to think of it. It was a raised hand, a clenched fist, and a blow in the face of God. God has to do with the conscience, whether you know it or not, and if conscience be not always the voice of God, it certainly is in the cases I have detailed. Sin is a fact, and the consciousness of sin is a fact, and these things give rise to a great problem, a dual problem, which I shall set before you — first, the demand for re- lease from association with the fact of sin ; secondly, the opportunity for living the higher life. I. The awful thing about sin is not the punishment it entails, but the guilt that it brings. And yet I would not make light about the punishment. The man who speaks bravely and boldly about bearing his own bur- den, and the penalty of his own sin, is talking of he knows not what. You cannot offer to bear the pen- alty of your own sin. There is no ratio between sin and punishment. If you were penitent to all eternity, you would be as guilty as you are this morning. Pun- ishment does not take away sin ; you remain associated with the fact just the same. Moreover, nobody can be punished for your sin — no, not Christ. There is not a passage in the New Testament which tells you that Jesus was punished instead of you. He could not be, for He had not sinned. What my text tells you is that He suffered instead of you, and that is where the re- demption consists. Again, repentance which is repen- tance in fear of punishment is unworthy of the name; GOD'S REMEDY FOR SIN 71 it is something else, I trow, that in every case is really at the bottom of the feeling. You want to get rid of associations with sin, but that is just what the world does not believe you ever can ; it is a seemingly im- possible thing. It is an extraordinary fact that the most difficult thing for any preacher to do is to con- vince a man of the world that there is forgiveness at all. " The Moving Finger writes ; and, having writ, Moves on : nor all your Piety nor Wit Shall lure it back to cancel half a Line, Nor all your Tears wash out a Word of it." Yet somehow the human heart protests against that dread sentence, and the cry is continually going up from the victim of propensity. " Oh, for some power to come into my life and save me from being what I am, and thinking what I think, and doing what I do ! " and a cry still more agonising from the man who has sinned away his opportunities. " Oh, that that which has been might be as though it never had been ! Oh, that I could wake and find that the past was a dream, and gone forever ! " II. There is the demand which arises for a new op- portunity for a higher life. This again is most diffi- cult to believe. The verdict of society is against it, the testimony of all experience is against it. Per- haps in the pew beside you there sits a woman who has sinned away her purity. Observe how society treats her. I do not say society is wrong; it has to protect itself, and this is the verdict of conscience upon sin that she knew was sin when it was committed. But how hopeless it seems for her to try to live a higher Ufe ! Her sisters may pose as patterns of probity, they 72 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS may become influences for good in the world, and their children may look up to them with hope and confi- dence ; but she must not pose as anything but a humble penitent all her days. The Magdalen must never try to be the saint, or society will remind her that, after all, she is only a sinner. The worst penalty of sin is to be shut off and shut down from the attainment of holi- |/ness; it seems out of character for certain kinds of ex- perience to attempt. And then there is a man here who sinned against society, and society found him out and then cast him out. Let him try to get back. He talks about a chance for a higher life. Where does the chance come in ? I do not say society is wrong, but it is certain to point the finger at him forever while he moves in and out amongst men. We say to one an- other. That is the man who stole in such a year, and got three months, or a year, or five years, as the case may have bf^en. Talk about the higher life for him ! Let him appear in a pulpit, and see what you will do with him. The evil deed will cling to him all his days. Yet the cry is going up, " Cannot I have the chance to live the nobler life that I once had the opportunity for, and sinned away ? " There is a paper in existence, of which you may have heard, called T. P.'s Weekly. I got it a while ago to read a certain article in it on George Eliot. I think it was the best article on that gifted authoress I ever read. The writer of the article said that one thing was constant in George Eliot's psychological writings — her insistence upon the Neme- sis of justice. She never seemed to give a gleam or a gUmmer of hope. Take her Hetty Sorrel, in "Adam Bede." Poor Hetty was more a fool than a sinner — a sinner because a fool. George Eliot trampled upon her, GOD'S REMEDY FOR SIN 13 crushed her, broke her ; from the first page to the last you don't see that there is the sHghtest offer of relief, not a word for poor Hetty. Now, who was Hetty ? I think we are justified in supposing that it was George Eliot herself, and her verdict upon her own sin is writ- ten large in her books. She did not believe in the new opportunity or the higher life. She believed that you must dree your weird, take your punishment, and, once you have taken it, be condemned to the lower plane forever. She makes one of her characters say, in words that are a wail, " It is not worth doing wrong for — nothing ever is in this world." Here, then, is the demand of the sinful heart and conscience. Let me see if I can meet it. Your sin can be taken from you as though it had never been. The Gospel that we have to preach is the declaration of Christ's power of so dealing with your sin that it is His, and not yours. Permit me an exag- geration for the moment. There are some truths so big that you cannot state them until you use hyper- bole. It is as though you were to say, " I am not guilty ; the Sinless One is." So complete is the deliv- erance that its moral value is undoubted, instantaneous ; a man can stand straight up on his feet and say, justi- fied in the sight of God, " My redemption has meant the passion of Deity; my Redeemer has the assets of my character. My broken life is His, and the way of opportunity has opened before me because of the holi- ness of Christ, as well as His passion." Why don't I explain it? I cannot; nobody can. I have my ideas about it which no theory could ever ex- haust. " Him who knew no sin God made to be sin on our behalf that we might become the righteousness 74 CITY TEMPLE SERMONS of God in Him." God is not reconciled to us by the suffering of Deity; there is no passage in the New Testament which says so. We are reconciled to God; and, from the first page of the New Testament to the last, the Gospel of reconciliation is the theme of the u /Master and the prophet and the apostle alike. God was ^.vvw *'_'^ Christ reconciling the world unto Himself,' not im- •C-vMN/Ma-^ puting unto us our trespasses. If ever there was a '^T^^ ' Gospel which just met the need that human ex- ;tf^Lv<^ perience most needs it is that Gospel of the J'Jt\^vl''' Cross of Christ. Let those who have sinned sin no 4 -TT "i^ more. The death of Christ is not an excuse for human H Js*rs»^^" ' "^y' ^^ ^^ God's verdict upon it. The Eternal ^^*^ * llighteousness spake in the suffering of the innocent vv* it when Jesus died on Calvary, but it means that you were set free, as free as the best of humankind, and the blackest sinner may become the brightest saint. " Though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow ; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool." It would be impossible to exaggerate the moral value of that Gospel ; and that cannot be un- true which has such moral results. There are some men who would remain bad all their lives if they were not assured of such an emancipation as this. You stand away from your sin, and between you and it is a great gulf fixed. Then begins the possibility of holi- ness ; then, and not till then. That Gospel justifies it- self by results ; and said I not well in declaring that the Atonement is there, the whole of Christianity? It is its beginning and its end. I appeal now to two orders of experience — the first, that mentioned at the beginning — the man who sees no need for that Gospel in his own case. Have you ^ -* U^'it^ U Ptv^ T-Vi^\|u