Ir- THE WORK OF THE HOLY SPIRIT BY ABRAHAM KUYPER, D.D., LL.D. Professor of Systematic Theology in the University of Amsterdam. TRANSLATED FROM THE DUTCH WITH EXPLANATORY NOTES BY Reverend HENRI DE VRIES with an INTRODUCTION BY Professor BENJAMIN B. WARFIELD, D.D., LL.D. OF PRINCETON THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY FUNK & WAGNALLS COMPANY NEW YORK AND LONDON Copyright, 1900 BY FUNK & WAGNALLS COMPANY [Registered at Stationers' Hall, London.} Printed in the United States 0/ A tnerica. 7—23 CONTENTS. PAGE Preface, ix Explanatory Notes to the American Edition, . . . . xv Partial List of the Works of Dr. Kuyper, xix Introduction by Prof, Benjamin B. Warkield, D.D., LL.D., . xxv VOLUME I. FIRST CHAPTER. Introduction. I. Careful Treatment Required, 3 II. Two Standpoints, 8 III. The Indwelling and Outgoing Works of God 13 IV. The Work of the Holy Spirit Distinguished 18 SECOND CHAPTER. The Creation. V. The Principle of Life in the Creature, 22 VI. The Host of Heaven and of Earth 27 VII. The Creaturely Man 32 VIII. Gifts and Talents 38 THIRD CHAPTER. Re-Creation. IX. Creation and Re-Creation, ........ 43 X. Organic and Individual, 48 XI. The Church Before and After Christ 52 FOURTH CHAPTER. The Holy Scripture of the Old Testament. XII. The Holy Scripture 56 XIII. The Scripture a Necessity, 6c IV CONTENTS XIV. The Revelation to Which the Scripture of the Old Testa- ment Owes Its Existence 65 XV. The Revelation of the Old Testament in Writing, . . 70 XVI. Inspiration, 74 FIFTH CHAPTER. The Incarnation ok the Word. XVII. Like One of Us 79 XVIII. Guiltless and Without Sin 84 XIX. The Holy Spirit in the Mystery of the Incarnation, . . 88 SIXTH CHAPTER. The Mediator. XX. The Holy Spirit in the Mediator, 93 XXI. Not Like unto Us, 97 XXII. The Holy Spirit in the Passion of Christ, . . . .102 XXIII. The Holy Spirit in the Glorified Christ 107 SEVENTH CHAPTER. The Outpouring of the Holy Spirit. XXIV. The Outpouring of the Holy Spirit 112 XXV. The Holy Spirit in the New Testament Other than in the Old 117 XXVI. Israel and the Nations 123 XXVII. The Signs of Pentecost, 128 XXVIII. The Miracle of Tongues I33 EIGHTH CHAPTER. The Apostolate. XXIX. The Apostolate, XXX. The Apostolic Scriptures XXXI. Apostolic Inspiration, XXXIL Apostles To-Uay? . 139 146 152 158 NINTH CHAPTER. The Holy Scriptures in the New Testament. XXXIII. The Holy Scriptures in the New Testament, XXXIV. The Need of the Xew-Testament Scripture, XXXV. The Character of the New-Testament Scripture, . . 164 . 169 . 174 CONTENTS f TENTH CHAPTER. The Church of Christ. PAGE XXXVI. The Church of Christ, I79 XXXVII. Spiritual Gifts 184 XXXVIII. The Ministry of the Word, 190 XXXIX. The Government of the Church, 196 VOLUME II. FIRST CHAPTER. Introduction. I. The Man to be Wrought upon, II. The Work of Grace a Unit, . III. Analysis Necessary, IV. Image and Likeness, V. Original Righteousness, VI. Rome, Socinus, Arminius, Calvin VII. The Neo-Kohlbruggians, VIII. After the Scriptures, IX. The Image of God in Man, . X. Adam Not Innocent, but Holy, 203 208 213 218 222 227 232 23S 242 247 SECOND CHAPTER. The Sinner to be Wrought upon. XI. Sin Not Material, . XII. Sin Not a Mere Negation, XIII. Sin a Power in Reversed Action, XIV. Our Guilt XV. Our Unrighteousness, . XVI. Our Death 252 258 263 268 273 278 THIRD CHAPTER. Preparatory Grace. XVII. What It Is 283 XVIII. What It Is Not 288 vi CONTENTS FOURTH CHAPTER. Regeneration. PAGE XIX. Old and New Terminology, 293 XX. Its Course 299 XXI. Regeneration the Work of God, 304 XXII. The Work of Regeneration, ....... 310 XXIII. Regeneration and Faith 3i5 XXIV. Implanting in Christ 322 XXV. Not a Divine-Human Nature, 327 XXVI. The Mystical Union with Immanuel, 333 FIFTH CHAPTER. Calling and Repentance. XXVII. The Calling of the Regenerate 333 XXVIII. The Coming of the Called, 343 XXIX. Conversion of All that Come 349 SIXTH CHAPTER. Justification. XXX. Justification 354 XXXI. Our Status, 361 XXXII. Justification from Eternity 367 XXXIII. Certainty of Our Justification 372 SEVENTH CHAPTER. Faith. XXXIV. Faith in General 378 XXXV. Faith and Knowledge 384 XXXVI. Brakel and Comrie 39° XXXVII. Faith in the Sacred Scriptures 397 XXXVIII. The Faculty of Faith 402 XXXIX. Defective Learning 407 XL. Faith in the Saved Sinner Alone, 4^5 XLI. Testimonies, .... .... 420 CONTENTS ▼»» VOLUME III. FIRST CHAPTER. Sanctification. I. Sanctification, • • • * ^^^ II, Sanctification a Mystery 435 III. Sanctification and Justification 440 IV. Sanctification and Justification (Continued), . . -444 V. Holy Raiment of One's Own Weaving 448 VI. Christ Our Sanctification, 452 VII. Application of Sanctification, 45 VIII. Sanctification in Fellowship with Immanuel, . . .460 IX. Implanted Dispositions, 4 4 X. Perfect in Parts, Imperfect in Degrees, 468 XI. The Pietist and the Perfectionist 474 XII. The Old Man and the New, 48o XIII. The Work of God in Our Work 485 XIV. The Person Sanctified, 49° XV, Good Works "^^ XVI. Self-Denial 5°^ SECOND CHAPTER. Love. XVII. Natural Love 5o8 XVIII. Love in the Triune Being of God 5^3 XIX. The Manifestation of Holy Love, 5^7 XX. God the Holy Spirit the Love which Dwells in the Heart, . 522 XXI. The Love of the Holy Spirit in Us S27 XXII. Love and the Comforter, 532 XXIII. The Greatest of These Is Love, S38 XXIV. Love in the Blessed Ones 543 XXV, The Communion of Saints, 548 XXVI. The Communion of Goods 554 XXVII. The Communion of Gifts S^o XXVIII. The Suffering of Love, . 565 XXIX. Love in the Old Covenant, 570 XXX. Organically One 575 XXXI. The Hardening Operation of Love 58o XXXII. The Love which Withers, . 584 viii CONTENTS PAGE XXXIII. The Hardening in the Sacred Scripture, . . . .589 XXXIV. Temporary Hardening, 594 XXXV. The Hardening of Nations, 598 XXXVI. The Apostolic Love 603 XXXVII. The Sin Against the Holy Ghost 608 XXXVIII. Christ or Satan 613 THIRD CHAPTEIL Prayer. XXXIX. The Essence of Prayer, 618 XL. Prayer and the Consciousness 623 XLI. Prayer in the Unconverted, 629 XLII. The Prayer of the Regenerated, 636 XLIII. Prayer for and with Each Other, 643 PREFACE OF THE AUTHOR. Special treatises on the Person of the Holy Spirit are compara- tively few, and systematic treatment of His IVorA is still more un- common. In dogmatics, it is true, this subject is introduced, devel- oped, and explained, but special treatment is exceptional. As much as there is written on Christ, so little is there written on the Holy Spirit. The work of John Owen on this subject is most widely known and still unsurpassed. In fact, John Owen wrote three works on the Holy Spirit, published in 1674, 1682, and 1693. He was naturally a prolific writer and theologian. Born in 1616, he died at the good old age of seventy-five years, in 1691. From 1642, when he published his first book, he continued writing books until his death. In 1826 Richard Baynes reissued the works of John Owen, D.D., edited by Thomas Russell, A.M., with memoirs of his life and wri- tings (twenty-one volumes). This edition is still in the market, and offers a treasury of sound and thorough theology. Besides Owen's works I mention the following: David Rungius, " Proof of the Eternity and Eternal Godhead of the Holy Spirit," Wittenberg, 1599. Seb. Nieman, " On the Holy Spirit." Jena, 1655. Joannes Ernest Gerhard, " On the Person of the Holy Spirit," Jena, 1660. Theod. Hackspann, " Dissertation on the Holy Spirit," Jena, 1655. J. G. Dorsche, " On the Person of the Holy Spirit," Konings- berg, 1690. Fr. Deutsch, " On the Personality of the Holy Spirit," Leipsic, 1711. Gottfr. Olearius (John F. Burgius), " On the Adoration and Wor- ship of the Holy Spirit," Jena, 1727. J. F. Buddeuss, " On the Godhead of the Holy Spirit," Jena, 1727. X PREFACE OF THE AUTHOR J. C. Pfeiffer, " On the Godhead of the Holy Spirit," Jena, 1740. G. F. Gude, " On the Martyrs as Witnesses for the Godhead ot the Holy Spirit," Leipsic, 1741. J. C. Danhauer, " On the Procession of the Holy Spirit from the Father and the Son," Strasburg, 1663. J. Senstius, Rostock, 1718, and J. A. Butstett, Wolfenbiittel, 1749. John Schmid, John Meisner, P. Havercom, G. Wegner, and C. M. Pfaff. The Work of the Holy Spirit has been discussed separately by the following: Anton, " The Holy Spirit Indispensable." Carsov, "On the Holy Spirit in Conviction." Wensdorf, "On the Holy Spirit as a Teacher." Boerner, " The Anointing of the Holy Spirit." Neuman, " The Anointing which Teaches All Things." Fries, " The Office of the Holy Spirit in General." Weiss, "The Holy Spirit Bringing into Remembrance." Foertsch, " On the Holy Spirit's Leading of the Children of God." Hoepfner, " On the Intercession of the Holy Spirit." Beltheim, Arnold, Gunther, Wendler, and Dummerick, " On the Groaning of the Holy Spirit." Meen, " On the Adoration of the Holy Spirit." Henning and Crusius, " On the Earnest of the Holy Spirit." The following Dutch theologians have written on the same subject: Gysbrecht Voetius in his" Select-Disput.," L, p. 466. Sam. Maresius, " Theological Treatise on the Personality and Godhead of the Holy Spirit," in his " Sylloge-Disput.," I., p. 364. Jac. Fruy- tier, " The Ancient Doctrine Concerning God the Holy Spirit, True, Proven, and Divine"; exposition of John xv. 26, 27. Camp. Vi- tringa, Jr., " Duae Disputationes Academicae de Notione Spiritus Sancti," in his Opuscula. Works on the same subject during the present century can scarcely be compared with the studies of John Owen. We notice the following: Herder, " Vom Paraclet." Kachel, " Von der Laster- ung wider den Heiligen Geist," Niimberg, 1875. E. Guers, " Le Saint-Esprit, Etude doctrinale et pratique sur Sa Personne et Son CEuvre," Toulouse, 1865. A. J. Gordon, " Dispensation of the Spirit." This meager bibliography shows what scant systematic treatment is accorded to the Person of the Holy Spirit. Studies of the JVork of the Holy Spirit are still more scanty. It is true there are several dissertations on separate parts of this Work, but it has never been treated in its organic unity. Not even by Guers, who acknowledges that his little book is not entitled to a place among dogmatics. PREFACE OF THE AUTHOR xi In fact, Owen is still unsurpassed, and is therefore much sought after by good theologians, both lay and clerical. And yet Owen's masterpiece does not seem to make a closer study of this subject su- perfluous. Altho invincible as a champion against the Arminians and Semi-Arminians of the latter part of the seventeenth century. his armor is too light to meet the doctrinal errors of the present time. For this reason the author has undertaken to offer the thinking Chris- tian public an exposition of the second part of this great subject, in a form adapted to the claims of the age and the errors of the day. He has not treated the first part, the Person of the Holy Spirit. This is not a subject for controversy. The Godhead of the Holy Spirit is indeed being confessed or denied, but the principles of which confession or denial is the necessary result are so divergent that a discussion between confessor and denier is impossible. If they ever enter the arena they should cross lances on the point of first principles, and discuss the Source of Truth. And when this is set- tled they might come to discuss a special subject like that of the Holy Spirit. But until then such a discussion with them that deny the Revelation would almost be sacrilegious. But with the IVork of the Holy Spirit it is different. For altho professing Christians acknowledge this Work, and all that it includes, and all that flows from it, yet the various groups into which they divide represent it in very divergent ways. What differences on this point between Calvinists and Ethicals. Reformed. Kohlbruggians. and Perfectionists ! The representations of the practical Supernatu- ralists, Mystics, and Antinomians can scarcely be recognized. It seemed to me impracticable and confusing to attack these deviating opinions on subordinate points. These differences should never be discussed but systematically. He that has not first staked off the entire domain in which the Holy Spirit works can not suc- cessfully measure any part of it, to the winning of a brother and to the glory of God. Hence leaving out polemics almost entirely. I have made an effort to represent the Work of the Holy Spirit in its organic rela- tions, so that the reader may be enabled to survey the entire do- main. And in surveying, who is not surprised at the ever-increas- ing dimensions of the Work of the Holy Spirit in all the things that pertain to God and man? Even tho we honor the Father and believe on the Son, how little do we live in the Holy Spirit ! It even seems to us sometimes that xii PREFACE OF THE AUTHOR for our sanctification only, the Holy Spirit is added accidentally to the great redemptive work. This is the reason why our thoughts are so little occupied with the Holy Spirit; why in the ministry of the Word He is so little honored ; why the people of God, when bowed in supplication before the Throne of Grace, make Him so little the object of their adora- tion. You feel involuntarily that of our piety, which is already small enough, He receives a too scanty portion. And since this is the result of an inexcusable lack of knowledge and appreciation of His glorious Work in the entire creation, holy enthusiasm constrained me, in the power of God, to offer my fellow champions for the faith once delivered by the fathers, some assist- ance in this respect. May the Holy Spirit, whose divine Work I have uttered in hu- man words and with stammering tongue, crown this labor with such blessing that you may feel His unseen Presence more closely, and that He may bring to your disquieted heart more abundant conso- lation. Amsterdam, April lo, 1888. Postscript for American readers, I add one more observation. This work contains occasional polemics against Methodism which to the many ministers and members of the churches called "Methodist" may appear unfair and uncalled for. Be it, there- fore, clearly stated that my controversy with Methodism is never with these particular churches. The Methodism that I contend with prevailed until recently in nearly all the Protestant churches as an unhealthy fruit of the Reveil in the beginning of this century. Methodism as here intended is identical with what Mr. Heath, in The Contanporary Review (May, 1898), criticized as wofully inadequate to place Protestantism again at the head of the spiritual movement. Methodism was born out of the spiritual decline of the Episco- pal Church of England and Wales. It arose as the reaction of the individual and of the spiritual subjective against the destructive power of the objective in the community as manifested in the Church of England. As such the reaction was precious and un- doubtedly a gift of God, and in its workings it would have contin- ued just as salutary if it had retained its character of a predominant reaction. PREFACE OF THE AUTHOR xiii It should have supposed the Church as a community as an objective power, and in this objective domain it should have vindi- cated the significance of the individual spiritual life and of the subjective confessing. But it failed to do this. From vindicating the subjective rights of the individual it soon passed into antagonism against the objec- tive rights of the community. This resulted dogmatically in the controversy about the objective work of God, viz., in His decree and His election, and ecclesiastically in antagonism against the ob- jective work of the office through the confession. It gave suprem- acy to the subjective element in man's free will and to the individ- ual element in the deciding of unchurchly conflicts in the Church. And so it retained no other aim than the conversion of individual sinners; and for this work it abandoned the organic, and retained only the mechanical method. As such it celebrated in the so-called Reveil its most glorious triumph, and penetrated nearly all the Protestant churches, and even the Episcopal Church under the name of Evangelicalism or Low Churchism. As a second reaction against the second decline of the Protestant churches of that time this triumph undoubtedly brought a great blessing. But when the necessity arose to reduce this new spiritual life to a definite principle, upon this to construct a Protestant-Christian life and world-view in opposition to the unchristian philosophies and to the essentially pantheistic life and world-view, and to give these position and to maintain it, then it pitiably failed. It lacked conscious, sharply defined principles; with its individualism and subjectivity it could not reach the social questions, and by reason of its complete lack of organic unity it could not formulate an in- dependent life and world-view; yea, it stood everywhere as an ob- stacle to such formations. For this reason it is absolutely necessary to teach the Protestant churches clearly to see this dark shadow of Methodism, while at the same time they should continue to study its precious signifi- cance as a spiritual reaction. Hence my contending with Methodism and my persistent point- ing to the imperative necessity of vindicating over against and alongside of the purely mechanical subjectivity the rights of the organic social in all human life, and of satisfying the need of the power of objectivity in presence of the extravagant statements of xiv PREFACE OF THE AUTHOR subjectivity. This presses all the more since in the Methodist theology of America the modem tendency is gaining ground. The Work of the Holy Spirit may not be displaced by the activ- ity of the human spirit, KUYPER. Amsterdam, April 21, 1899. EXPLANATORY NOTES TO THE AMERICAN EDITION. Dr. Kuyper's work on the Holy Spirit first appeared in the He- raut in weekly instalments, after which it was published in book form, Amsterdam, 1888, This explains the object of the author in writing the book, viz., the instruction of the people of the Netherlands. Written in the ordinary language of the people, it meets the need of both laity and clergy. However, depth of thought was not sacrificed to simplicity of speech. On the contrary, the latter was only the instrument to make the former lucid and transparent. The Heraut is a religious weekly of which Dr. Kuyper has been the editor-in-chief for more than twenty years. It is published on Friday, and forms the Sunday reading of a large constituency. Through its columns Dr. Kuyper has taught again the people of the Netherlands, in city and country, the principles of the Reformed faith, and how to give these principles a new development in ac- cordance with the modem conscience of our time. Dr. Kuyper is not an apologist, but an earnest and conscientious reconstructionist. He has made the people acquainted with the symbols of the Reformed faith, and by expounding the Scriptures to them he has maintained and defended the positions of those symbols. His success in this respect appears conspicuously in the reformation of the Reformed Churches in 1886, and in the subsequent development of marvelous energy and activity in Church and State which are products of revived and reconstructed Calvinism. With- out the patient toil and labor of this quarter of a century, that ref- ormation would have been impossible. In his religious and political reformations. Dr. Kuyper proceed- ed from the personal conviction that the salvation of Church and State could be found only in a return to the deserted foundations of the national Reformed theology; but not to reconstruct it in its xvi NOTES TO THE AMERICAN EDITION worn-out form. " His fresh, brave spirit is entirely free from all conservatism" (Dr. W. Geesink). He is a man o/his time as well a&for his time. The new superstructure which he has been rear- ing upon the carefully reuncovered foundations of the Reformed theology he seeks to adapt to all the needs, demands, and distresses of the present. In how far he has succeeded time only can tell. Since 1871 he has published in the columns of the Heraut and afterward in book form the following: " Out of the Word," Bible studies, four volumes; "The Incarnate Word, '" The Work of the Holy Spirit," three volumes, and " E Voto Dordraceno," an explana- tion of the Heidelberg Catechism, four volumes. This last work is a rich treasury of sound and thorough theology, dogmatic and prac- tical. He has published several other treatises which have not yet appeared in book form. Among these we notice especially *' On Common Grace," which, still in process of publication, is full of most excellent reading. The number of his works amounts already to over one hundred and fifty, a partial list of which is to be found following this introduction. The following works have been translated into English : " Ency- clopaedia of Sacred Theology" (Charles Scribner's Sons, 1898); "Calvinism and Art"; "Calvinism and Our Constitutional Lib- erties"; "Pantheism and Destruction of the Boundaries"; "The Stone Lectures." For the better understanding of the work, the translator begs to offer the following explanations : " Ethical Irenical," or simply " Ethical," is the name of a move- ment in the Netherlands that seeks to mediate between modem Rationalism and the orthodox confession of the old Reformed Church. It seeks to restore peace and tranquillity not by a return to the original church order, nor by the maintenance of the old Confession and the removal of deviating ministers through trial and deposition (Judicial Treatment), but by making efforts to find a common ground for both parties. It proceeds from the idea that that which is diseased in the Church can and will return to health : partly by letting the disease alone to run its course {Doorzieken) — forgetting that corruption in the Church is not a disease, but a sin ; * partly 1 j a liberal diffusion of Bible knowledge among the people (Medical Treatment). * Dr. W. Geesink. NOTES TO THE AMERICAN EDITION xvii Dr. Chantepie de la Saussaj'e, a disciple of Schleiermacher, was the spiritual father of this Ethical theology. Born in 1818, Dr. De la Saussaye entered the University of Leyden in 1836. Dissatis- fied with the rational supernaturalism of a former generation, unable to adapt himself to the vagueness and ambiguousness of the so-called Groningen school, or to find a basis for the development of his theological science in the treasures of the Calvinistic theol- ogy, he felt himself strongly attracted to the school of Schelling, and through him he came under the influence of Pantheism. During the years of his pastorate in Leeuwarden (1842-48) and in Leyden to 1872, he modified and developed the ideas of Schleiermacher in an independent way. The Ethical theology was the result. Its basic thought may be comprehended as follows : " Transcendent above nature, God is also immanent in nature. This immanence is not merely physical, but also, on the ground of this, ethical. This ethical immanence manifests itself in the relig- ious moral life, which is the real and true life of man. It originates in the heathen world, and through Israel ascends to Christ, in whom it attains completion. Among the heathen it manifests itself espe- cially in the conscience with its two elements of fear and hope; among Israel in Law and Prophecy ; and in Christ in His perfect union with God and humanity. For this reason He is the Word/ar excellence, the Central Man, in whom all that is human is realized. However, while until Christ it proceeded from circumference to center, after Christ it proceeds in ever-widening circles from center to circumference. Life flows from Christ into the Church, which, having temporarily become an institution for the education of the nations, became through the Reformation and the French Revolti- tion what it should be, a confessing Church. Its power lies no more in ecclesiastical organization, neither in authoritative creed and confession, but in moral activity and influence. The divine Word in the conscience begins to work and to govern , Christianity is being transferred into the moral domain. " However, the perfect ethical immanence of God is not attained in this dispensation ; being always possible, it may be realized in the succeeding eons."* It is not surprising that this theology, obliterating with its pan- theistic current the boundary-lines between the Creator and the * Dr. Bavink. xviii NOTES TO THE AMERICAN EDITION creature, should have come in hostile contact with the Reformed theology, which most zealously guards these boundary-lines. In fact, instead of uniting the two existing parties on one common ground, the Ethical movement added a third, which in the subse- quent conflict was much more bitter, arbitrary, and tyrannical than the moderns, and which has already abandoned the Holy Scriptures in the manner of Wellhausen and Kuenen. In 1872 Dr. Chantepie de la Saussaye was appointed professor of theology in the University of Groningen, succeeding Hofstede de Groot. He filled this position but thirteen months. He fell asleep February 13, 1874. His most excellent disciple is the highly gifted Dr. J. H. Gun- ning, till 1899 professor of theology at the University of Leyden. The name of Dr. Kohlbrugge is frequently found in the follow- ing pages. Born a Lutheran, a graduate of the seminary of Am- sterdam, a candidate for the Lutheran ministry, Dr. Kohlbrugge became acquainted with the Reformed theology through the study of its earlier exponents. Known and feared as an ardent admirer of the doctrine of predestination, the authorities first of the Luther- an then of the State Church refused him admission to the minis- try. He left Holland for Germany, where for the same reason he was debarred from the pulpits of the German Reformed churches. At last he was called to the pulpit of a Free Reformed church at Elberfeld, established by himself. He was a profound theologian, a prolific writer, and one zealous for the honor of his Master. His numerous writings, half Luther- an, half Reformed, were spread over Holland, the Rhenish prov- inces, the cantons of Switzerland, and even among some Reformed churches of Bohemia. Some of his disciples fell into Antinomianism, and occupy pul- pits in the State Church at the present time. They are called Neo- Kohlbruggians. Professor Bohl, of Vienna, is the learned repre- sentative of the Old Kohlbruggians. Both the old and the new school are strongly opposed to Calvinism. The translation of " The Work of the Holy Spirit " was under- taken by appointment of the author, to whom the proof-sheets of al- most all the first volume were submitted for correction. Being ■' overwhelmed " with work, and being fully satisfied with the trans- lation so far as he had seen it, the author decided not to delay the work for the reading of the remaining volumes, but to leave that to NOTES TO THE AMERICAN EDITION xix the discretion of the translator. A question of the omission of mat- ter referring to local conditions and to current theological discus- sions was also left to the translator's judgment. Grateful thanks are due to Rev. Thomas Chalmers Straus, A.M., of Peekskill, N. Y. , for valuable assistance in preparing this work for the press. Translator. Peekskill, N. Y., January 27, 1900. The following is a partial list of the works of Dr. Kuyper: "J. Calvini et J. a Lasco: De Ecclesia Sententiarum inter se Corapositio Acad. Diss." 1862. "Joannis a Lasco: Opera turn Edita quam Inedita." Two vols., 1866. "Wat moeten wy doen, het stemrecht aan ens zelven houden of den Kerkeraad tnachtigen ? " (What Are We to Do : Retain the Right of Voting, or Authorize the Consistory ?) 1867. "De M en sch wording Gods Het Levensbeginsel der Kerk." Intreerede te Utrecht. (The Incarnation of God the Vital Principle of the Church. Inaugural discourse at Utrecht. ) 1867. "Het Graf." Leerrede aan den avond van Goede-Vrydag. (The Tomb. Sermon on Good Friday night.) 1869. "Zestal Leerredenen." (Six Sermons.) 1869. "De Kerkelyke Goederen." (Church Property.) 1869. "Vrymaking der Kerk. (The Emancipation of the Church.) 1869. "Het Beroep op het Volksgeweten." (An Appeal to the National Con- science.) 1869. "Eenvormigheid de Vloek van het Moderne Leven." (Uniformity the Curse of Modern Life.) 1869. "De Schrift het Woord Gods." (Scripture the Word of God.) 1870. "Kerkeraadsprotocollen der Hollandsche Gemeente te London." 1569- 1571. (The Consistorial Minutes of the Dutch Church in London.) 1870. "De Hollandsche Gemeente te London." 1 570-1 571. (The Dutch Church in London.) 1870. " Conservatisme en Orthodoxie, Valsche en Ware Behoudzucht. ** (Conser- vatism and Orthodoxy, the True and the False Instinct of Self-Preser- vation.) 1870. "Gewortelden Gegrond, de Kerk als Organisme en Institute." (Rooted and Grounded, the Church as Organism and Institute.) Inaugural at Amsterdam. 1870. "De Leer der Onsterfelykheid en de Staats School." (The Doctrine of Immortality and the State School.) 1870. XX NOTES TO THE AMERICAN EDITION "Een Perel in de Verkeerde Schelp." (A Pearl in the Wrong Shell.) 1871. "Het Modernisme een Fata Morgana op Christelyk Gabled." (Modern- ism a Fata Morgana in the Christian Domain.) 1871. "De Zending Naar de Schrift." (Missions According to Scripture.) 1871. " Tweede Zestal Leerredenen. " (Another Six Sermons. ) 1871. "O God Wees My Zondaar Genadig '" Leerrede op den Laatsten Dag van Het Jaar, 1870. (O God be Merciful to Me a Sinner' Sermon on Old Year's night, 1870.) 1871. "De Bartholomeusnacht." (The Bartholomew Night.) 1872. "De Sneeuw van den Libanon." (The Snow of Lebanon.) 1872. "Bekeertu Want het Koningryk Gods is Naby " (Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven Is at Hand). Sermon on the last day of the year 187 1 ^872. "HetVergryp der Zeventien Ouderlingen " (The Mistake of the Seven- teen Elders. Memoir of the Consistory of Amsterdam.) 1872. " Uit het Woord. " (Out of the Word. ) Devotional Bible studies. 1873. "Het Calvinisme, Oorsprong en Waarborg onzer Constitutioneele Vry- heden." (Calvinism, the Origin and Surety of Our Constitutional Liberties.) 1874. "Uit het Woord." (Out of the Word. ) Second volume, 1875. "De Schoolquestie." (The School Question.) Six brochures, 1875. "Liberalisten en Joden." (Liberalists and Jews.) 1878. " Uit het Woord." (Out of the Word. ) Third volume. 1879. "Ons Program." (Our Program.) 1879 "De Leidsche Professoren en de Executeurs der Dordtsche Nalatenschap. " (The Leyden Professors and the Executors of the Inheritance of Dordt.) 1879. " Revisie der Revisielegende. " (Revision of the Revision Legend. ) 1879. "De Synode der Nederlandsche Revormde Kerk uit Haar Eigen Ver- maan brief Geoordeeld." (The Synod of the Reformed Church in the Netherlands Judged by Its Own Epistle of Exhortation.) 1879. "Antirevolutionair ook in uw Gezin." (Anti-Revolutionary Even in the Family.) 18S0. "Bede om een Dubbel Corrigendum." (Prayer for a Double Corrigen- dum.) 1880. "Strikt Genomen." (Taken Strictly. The Right to Found a University Tested by Public Law and History.) 1880. "Souvereiniteitin EigenKring." (Sovereignty in Our Own Circle.) 1880. "Honig uit den Rottsteen." (Honey Out of the Rock.) 1880. " De Hedendaagsche Schriftcritiek in Hare Bedenkelyke Strekking voor de Gemeente des Levenden Gods." (Modern Criticism and Its Danger- ous Influence upon the Church of the Living God.) Discourse. 1S82. NOTES TO THE AMERICAN EDITION xxl "D. Franscisci Jnnii : Opuscula Theologica. " 1882. "Alexander Comrie." Translated from The Catholic Presbyterian Re- view. 1882. "Ex Ungue Leouem." Dr. Doedes's Method of Interpretation Tested on One Point. 1882. "Welke zyn de Vooruitzchten voor de Studenten der vrye Universiteit? " (What Are the Prospects for the Students of the Free University?) 1882. "Tractaat van de Reformatie der Kerken." (Tractate of the Refornaation of the Churches.) 1883. "Honig uit den Rottsteen." (Honey Out of the Rock. ) Second volume. 1883. "Uit het Woord." (Out of the Word.) Second series, first volume ; That Grace Is Particular. 1884. "Yzer en Leem." (Iron and Clay.) Discourses. 1885. " Uit het Woord. " (Out of the Word.) Second volume : The Doctrine of the Covenants. 1885. "Uit het Woord." Third volume : The Practise of Godliness. 1886. "Het Dreigend Conflict." (The Conflict Threatening.) 1886. "Het Conflict Gekomen." (The Conflict Come.) Three vols., 1886. "Dr. Kuyper voor de Synode. " (Dr. Kuyper Before the Synod.) 1886. "Laatste Woord tot de Conscientie van de Leden der Synode." (Last Word to the Conscience of the Members of Synod.) On behalf of the persecuted members of the Consistory of Amsterdam. 1886. "Afwerping van het Juk der Synodale Hierarchic." (The Throwing Off of the Yoke of the Synodical Hierarchy.) 18S6. "Alzoozal het onder u niet. zyn." (It Shall Not bo So Among You.) 1886. " Eene ziel die zich Nederbuigt. " (A Prostrate Soul. ) Opening address of the Reformed Church Congress at Amsterdam. 18S7. "DeVerborgeu Dingen zyn voor den Heere Onzen God." (The Secret Things Belong to the Lord Our God.) 1887. "Sion Door Recht Verlost." (Zion Saved through Judgment.) 18S7. "DeVleeschwordingdes Woords. " (The Incarnation of the Word.) 1887. "Dagen van Goede Boodschap." (Days of Glad Tidings.) 1887. "Tweederlei Vaderland." (Two Fatherlands.) 1887. "Het Calvinisme en de Kunst." (Calvinism and Art.) 1888. "Dr. Gisberti Voetii Selectarum Disputationum Fasciculus." In the Bib- liotheca Reformat a 1888. "Het Work des Heihgen Geestes." (The Work of the Holy Spirit.) Three vols., 1889. "Homer voor den Sabbath." (Homer for the Sabbath.) Meditations on the Sabbath. 1889. xxii NOTES TO THE AMERICAN EDITION "Niet de Vryheidsboom Maar het Kruis. " (Not the Tree of Liberty, but the Cross.) Opening address at the tenth annual meeting of the Deputies. 1889. " Eer is Teer." (Honor Is Tender.) 1889. "Handenarbeid." (Manual Labor.) 1889. "Scolastica." (The Secret of True Study. ) 1889. "Tractaat van den Sabbath." (Tractate on the Sabbath.) A historical dogmatic study. 1890. "Separatie en Doleantie." ("Secession and Doleantie." "Doleantie" — from doleo, to suffer pain, to mourn — is in Holland the historic name adopted by a body of Christians to designate the fact that they are either being persecuted by the State Church or have been expelled from its communion on account of their adherence to the orthodox confession.) 1890. "Zion's Roem en Sterkte." (Zion's Strength and Glory.) 1890. "De Twaalf Patriarchen." (The Twelve Patriarchs.) A study of Bible characters. 1890. "Eenige Kameradviezen. " (Chamber Advices.) Of the years 1874, 1875. 1890. " Is er Aan de Publieke Universiteit ten onzent Plaats voor eeue Facul- teit der Theologie?" (Is tbere Room in Our Public Universities for a Theological Faculty?) 1890. "Calvinism and Confessional Revision." In T/ie Presbyterian and Re- formed Review, July, 1891. "Voor een Distel een Mirt." (Instead of a Brier a Myrtle-Tree.) 1891. "Maranatha." Opening address at the meeting of Deputies. 1891. "Gedrachtslyn by de Stembus." (Line of Conduct at the Polls.) 1891. " Het Sociale Vraagstuk en de Christelyke Religie. " (The Social Question and the Christian Religion.) Opening address at the Social Congress. 1891. "De Verflauwing der Grenzen." (The Destruction of the Boundaries.) Address at the transfer of the Rectorate of the Free University. 1892. "In de Schaduwe des Doods. " (In the Shadows of Death.) Meditations for the sick-charaber and death-bed. 1893. " Encyclopsedie der Heilige Godgeleerdheid." (Encyclopedia of Sacred Theology.) Three vols. , 1894. "E Voto Dordraceno." Explanation of the Heidelberg Catechism. Four vols., 1894-95. Levinus W. C. Keuchenius, LL.D. Biography. 1896. "De Christus en de Sociale Nooden, en de Democratische Klippen." (Christ and the Social Needs and Democratic Dangers.) 1895. "Ultgave van de Statenvertaling van den Bybel." (Edition of the Au- thorized Version of the Bible. ) 1895. NOTES TO THE AMERICAN EDITION xxiii " De Zegen des Heeren over Onze Kerken. " (The Blessing of the Lord upon Our Churches.) 1896. "Vrouwen uit de Heilige Schrift." (Women of the Bible.) 1897, "Le Parti Antirevolutionaire." (The Anti-Revolutionary Party.) In Les Pay-Pas. Presented by the Dutch Society of Journalists to the foreign journalists at the inauguration of the Queen. 1898. "By de Gratie Gods." (By the Grace of God.) Address. 1898. "Calvinism." Six lectures delivered at Princeton. N. J., October. 1898. "Calvinism in History." "Calvinism and Religion." "Calvinism and Politics," "Calvinism and Science," "Calvinism and Art," "Calvinism and the Future." Published in Dutch. January, 1899. "Als gy in uw Huis Zit." (When Thou Sittest in Thine House.) Medita- tions for the Family. July, 1899. "Evolutie. " (Evolution.) Oration at the transfer of the rectorate of the Free University, October 20. 1899. INTRODUCTORY NOTE. By prof, benjamin B. WARFIELD, D.D.. LL.D., Of Princeton Theological Seminary. It is fortunately no longer necessary formally to introduce Dr. Kuyper to the American religious public. Quite a number of his remarkable essays have appeared of late years in our periodicals. These have borne such titles as " Calvinism in Art," " Calvinism the Source and Pledge of Our Constitutional Liberties," " Calvinism and Confessional Revision." "The Obliteration of Boundaries," "The Antithesis between Symbolism and Revelation "; and have appeared in the pages of such publications as Christian Thought, Bibliotheca Sacra, The Presbyterian and Reformed Review— not, we may be sure, without delighting their readers with the breadth of their treatment and the high and penetrating quality of their thought. The col- umns of The Christian Ititelligencer have from time to time during the last year been adorned with examples of Dr. Kuyper's practical expositions of Scriptural truth ; and now and again a brief but il- luminating discussion of a topic of present interest has appeared in the columns of The Independent. The appetite whetted by this taste of good things has been partially gratified by the publication in English of two extended treatises from his hand — one discussing in a singularly profound way the principles of " The Encyclopedia of Sacred Theology" (Charles Scribner's Sons, 1898), and the other expounding with the utmost breadth and forcefulness the funda- mental principles of " Calvinism " (The Fleming H. Revell Company, 1899). The latter volume consists of lectures delivered on " The L. P. Stone Foundation," at Princeton Theological Seminary in the autumn of 1898, and Dr. Kuyper's visit to America on this occasion brought him into contact with many lovers of high ideas in Amer- ica, and has left a sense of personal acquaintance with him on the minds of multitudes who had the good fortune to meet him or to hear his voice at that time. It is impossible for us to look longer upon Dr. Kuyper as a stranger, needing an introduction to our fa- xxvi INTRODUCTORY NOTE vorable notice, when he appears again before us; he seems rather now to be one of our own prophets to whose message we have a certain right, and a new book from whose hands we welcome as we would a new gift from our near friend charged in a sense with care for our welfare. The book that is at present offered to the American public does not indeed come fresh from his hands. It has already been within the reach of his Dutch audience for more than a decade (it was published in 1888), It is only recently, how- ever, that Dr. Kuyper has come to belong to us also, and the pub- lication of this book in English, we may hope, is only another step in the process which will gradually make all his message ours. Certainly no one will turn over the pages of this volume — much less will he, as our Jewish friends would say, " sink himself into the book" — without perceiving that it is a very valuable gift which comes to us in it from our newly found teacher. It is, as will be at once observed, a comprehensive treatise on the Work of the Holy Ghost — a theme higher than which none can occupy the attention of the Christian man, and yet one on which really comprehensive treatises are comparatively rare. It is easy, to be sure, to exag- gerate the significance of the latter fact. There never was a time, of course, when Christians did not confess their faith in the Holy Ghost ; and there never was a time when they did not speak to one another of the work of the Blessed Spirit, the Executor of the God- head not only in the creation and upholding of the worlds and in the inspiration of the prophets and apostles, but also in the regen- erating and sanctifying of the soul. Nor has there ever been a time when, in the prosecution of its task of realizing mentally the treasures of truth put in its charge in the Scriptural revelation, the Church has not busied itself also with the investigation of the mys- teries of the person and work of the Spirit; and especially has there never been a time since that tremendous revival of religion which we call the Reformation when the whole work of the Spirit in the application of the redemption wrought out by Christ has not been a topic of the most thorough and loving study of Christian men. Indeed, it partly arises out of the very intensity of the study given to the saving activities of the Spirit that so few comprehensive treatises on the work of the Spirit have been written. The subject has seemed so vast, the ramifications of it have appeared so far- reaching, that few have had the courage to undertake it as a whole. Dogmaticians have, to be sure, been compelled to present the en- BY PROFESSOR WARFIELD xxvii tire range of the matter in its appropriate place in their completed systems. But when monographs came to be written, they have tended to confine themselves to a single segment of the great cir- cle; and thus we have had treatises rather on, say, Regeneration, or Justification, or Sanctification, on the Anointing of the Spirit, or the Intercession of the Spirit, or the Sealing of the Spirit, than on the work of the Spirit as a whole. It would be a great mistake to think of the doctrine of the Holy Spirit as neglected, merely be- cause it has been preferably presented under its several rubrics or parts, rather than in its entirety. How easily one may fall into such an error is fairly illustrated by certain criticisms that have been recently passed upon the Westminster Confession of Faith — which is (as a Puritan document was sure to be) very much a treat- ise on the work of the Spirit — as if it were deficient, in not having a chapter specifically devoted to " the Holy Spirit and His Work," The sole reason why it does not give a chapter to this subject, how- ever, is because it prefers to give nine chapters to it ; and when an attempt was made to supply the fancied omission, it was found that pretty much all that could be done was to present in the proposed new chapter a meager summary of the contents of these nine chap- ters. It would have been more plausible, indeed, to say that the Westminster Confession comparatively neglected the work of Christ, or even the work of God the Father. Similarly the lack in our literature of a large number of comprehensive treatises on the work of the Holy Spirit is in part due to the richness of our litera- ture in treatises on the separate portions of that work severally. The significance of Dr. Kuyper's book is, therefore, in part due only to the fact that he has had the courage to attack and the gifts success- fully to accomplish a task which few have possessed the breadth either of outlook or of powers to undertake. And it is no small gain to be able to survey the whole field of the work of the Holy Spirit in its organic unity under the guidance of so fertile, so systematic, and so practical a mind. If we can notlook upon it as breaking en- tirely new ground, or even say that it is the only work of its kind since Owen, we can at least say that it brings together the material belonging to this great topic with a systematizing genius that is very rare, and presents it with a penetrating appreciation of its meaning and a richness of apprehension of its relations that is ex- ceedingly illuminating. It is to be observed that we have not said without qualification xxviii INTRODUCTORY NOTE that the comparative rarity of such comprehensive treatises on the work of the Holy Spirit as Dr. Kuyper's is due simply to the great- ness and difficulty of the task. "We have been careful to say that it is only in part due to this cause. It is only in the circles to which this English translation is presented, to say the truth, that this remark is applicable at all. It is the happiness of the Re- formed Christians of English speech that they are the heirs of what must in all fairness be spoken of as an immense literature upon this great topic ; it may even be said with some justice that the pecu- liarity of their theological labor turns just on the diligence and depth of their study of this locus. It is, it will be remembered, to John Owen's great " Discourse Concerning the Holy Spirit" that Dr. Kuyper points as hitherto the normative treatise on the subject. But John Owen's book did not stand alone in his day and genera- tion, but was rather merely symptomatic of the engrossment of the theological thought of the circle of which he was so great an ornament in the investigation of this subject. Thomas Goodwin's treatise on " The Work of the Holy Ghost in Our Salvation " is well worthy of a place by its side ; and it is only the truth to say that Puritan thought was almost entirely occupied with loving study of the work of the Holy Spirit, and found its highest expression in dog- matico-practical expositions of the several aspects of it — of which such treatises as those of Charnock and Swinnerton on Regeneration are only the best-known examples among a multitude which have fallen out of memory in the lapse of years. For a century and a half afterward, indeed, this topic continued to form the hinge of the theologizing of the English Nonconformists. Nor has it lost its central position even yet in the minds of those who have the' best right to be looked upon as the successors of the Puritans. There has been in some quarters some decay, to be sure, in sure- ness of grasp and theological precision in the presentation of the subject; but it is possible that a larger number of practical treat- ises on some element or other of the doctrine of the Spirit continue to appear from the English press annually than on any other branch of divinity. Among these, such books as Dr. A. J. Gordon's " The Ministry of the Spirit," Dr. J. E. Cumming's "Through the Eternal Spirit," Principal H. C. G. Moule's " Veni Creator," Dr. Redford's " Vox Dei," Dr. Robson's " The Holy Spirit, the Paraclete," Dr. Vaughan's " The Gifts of the Holy Spirit" — to name only a few of the most recent books — attain a high level of theological clarity BY PROFESSOR WARFIELD xxix and spiritual power; while, if we may be permitted to go back only a few years, we may find in Dr. James Buchanan's " The Office and Work of the Holy Spirit," and in Dr. George Smeaton's " The Doc- trine of the Holy Spirit," two treatises covering the whole ground — the one in a more practical, the other in a more didactic spirit — in a manner worthy of the best traditions of our Puritan fathers. There has always been a copious stream of literature on the work of the Holy Spirit, therefore, among the English-speaking churches ; and Dr. Kuyper's book comes to us not as something of a novelty, but as a specially finely conceived and executed presentation of a topic on which we are all thinking. But the case is not the same in all parts of Christendom. If we lift our eyes from our own special condition and view the Church at large, it is a very dififerent spectacle that greets them. As we sweep them down the history of the Church, we discover that the topic of the work of the Holy Spirit was one which only at a late date really emerged as the explicit study of Christian men. As we sweep them over the whole extent of the modern Church, we dis- cover that it is a topic which appeals even yet with little force to very large sections of the Church. The povertj' of Continental theology in this locus is, indeed, after all is said and done, depressing. Note one or two little French books, by E. Guers and G. Tophel,* and a couple of formal studies of the New-Testament doctrine of the Spirit by the Dutch writers Stemler and Thoden Van Velzen, called out by The Hague Society — and we have before us almost the whole list of the older books of our century which pretend in any way to cover the ground. Nor has very much been done more recently to remedy the deficiency. The amazing theological activity of latter-day Germany has, to be sure, not been able to pass so fruit- ful a theme entirely by ; and her scholars have given us a few scien- tific studies of sections of the Biblical material. The two most significant of these appeared, indeed, in the same year with Dr. Kuyper's book — Gloel's " Der heilige Geist in des Heilsverkiindi- gung des Paulus," and Gunkel's " Die Wirkungen des heiligen Geistes nach d. popular. Anschauung der apostoHschen Zeit und der Lehre d. A. Paulus" (2d ed., 1899); these have been followed in the same spirit by Weienel in a work called " Die Wirkungen des Geistes und ♦Guers' " Le Saint-Esprit : fetude Doctrinale et Practique " (1865); G. Tophel's "The Work of the Holy Spirit in Man" (E. T., 1S82), and also more recently " Le Saint-Esprit ; Cinq Nouvelles Etudes Bibliques " (1899) . XXX INTRODUCTORY NOTE der Geister im nachapostolischen Zeitalter" (1899); while a little earlier the Dutch theologian Beversluis issued a more comprehensive study, " De Heilige Geest en zijne werkingen volgens de Schriften des Nieuwen Verbonds" (1896). Their investigation of the Biblical material, however, is not only very formal, but it is also dominated by such imperfect theological presuppositions that it can carry the student scarcely a step forward. Very recently something better in this respect has appeared in such books as Th. Meinhold's " Der heilige Geist und sein Wirken am einzelnen Menschen, mit beson- derer Beziehung auf Luther" (1890, i2mo, pp. 228);* W. Kolling's " Pneumatologie, oder die Lehre von der Person des heiligen Geistes " 1894, 8vo, pp. 368); Karl von Lechler's "Die biblische Lehre vom heiligenGeiste"(i899, 8vo, pp. 307); andK. F. Nosgen's" Geschichte von der Lehre vom heiligen Geiste" (1899, 8vo, pp. 376); — which it is to be hoped are the beginnings of a varied body of scholarly works from the Lutheran side, out of which may, after a while, grow some such comprehensive and many-sided treatment of the whole subject as that which Dr. Kuyper has given our Dutch breth- ren, and now us in this English translation. But none of them pro- vides the desired treatise itself, and it is significant that no one even professes to do so. Even where, as in the case of the books of Meinhold and von Lechler, the treatment is really topical, the author is careful to disclaim the purpose to provide a well-compacted, systematic view of the subject, by putting on his title-page a hint of a historical or exegetical point of view. In fact, only in a single instance in the whole history of German theological literature — or, we may say, prior to Dr. Kuyper in the entire history of continental theological literature — has any one had- the courage or found the impulse to face the task Dr. Kuyper has so admirably executed. We are referring, of course, to the great work on " Die Lehre vom heiligen Geiste," which was projected by that theological giant. K. A. Kahnis, but the first part of which only was published — in a thin volume of three hundred and fifty-six pages, in 1847. It was doubtless symptomatic of the state of feel- ing in Germany on the subject that Kahnis never found time or en- couragement in a long life of theological pursuits to complete his * Meinhold's book is mainly a Lutheran polemic in behalf of funda- mental princii^les, against the Ritschlian rationalism on this subject. As such its obverse is provided in the recent treatise of Rudolf Otto, " Die Au- schauung vom heiligen Geiste bei Luther " (1898). BY PROFESSOR WARFIELD xxxi book. And, indeed, it was greeted in theological circles at the time with something like amused amazement that any one could devote so much time and labor to this theme, or expect others to find time and energy to read such a treatise. We are told that a well- known theologian remarked caustically of it that if things were to be carried out on that scale, no one could expect to live long enough to read the literature of his subject; and the similar remark made by C. Hase in the preface to the fifth edition of his " Dogmatic," tho it names no names, is said to have had Kahnis's book in view.* The significance of Kahnis's unique and unsuccessful attempt to provide for German Protestantism some worthy treatment of the doctrine of the Holy Spirit is so great that it will repay us to fix the facts concerning it well in our minds. And to this end we ex- tract the following account of it from the introduction of the work of von Lechler which we have just mentioned (p. 22 sgq.) : "We have to indicate, in conclusion, another circumstance in the his- tory of our doctrine, which is in its way just as significant for the attitude of present-day science toward this topic as was the silence of the first Ecu- menical Council concerning it for the end of the first theological age. It is the extraordinary poverty of monographs on the Holy Spirit. Altho there do exist some, and in some instances important, studies dealing with the subject, yet their number is out of all proportion to the greatness and the extent of the problems. We doubtless should not err in assu- ming that vital interest in a scientific question will express itself not merely in comprehensive handbooks and encyclopedic compendiums, the latter of which are especially forced to see to the completeness of the list of subjects treated, but of necessity also in those separate investigations in which especially the fresh vigor of youth is accustomed to make proof of its fitness for higher studies. What lacuncE we should have to regret in other branches of theological science if a rich development of monographic litera- ture did not range itself by the side of the compendiums, breaking out here and there new paths, laying deeper foundations, supplying valuable mate- rial for the constructive or decorative completion of the scientific structure ! All this, in the present instance, however, has scarcely made a beginning. The sole separate treatise which has been projected on a really profound and broad basis of investigation — the " Lehre vom heiligen Geiste " of K. A. Kahnis (then at Breslau), 1847 — came to a standstill with its first part. This celebrated theologian, who had certainly in his possession in surpri- sing measure the qualities and acquisitions that fitted him to come for- ward as a preparer of the way in this uncertain and little worthily studied subject, had set before himself the purpose of investigating this, as he him- self called it, ' extraordinarily neglected ' topic, at once on its Biblical, ec« * See Holtzmann in the Theolog. Liter aturzeitung of 1896, xxv., p. 646. xxxii INTRODUCTORY NOTE clesiastical, historical, and dogmatic sides. The history of his book is exceedingly instructive and suggestive with respect to the topic itself. He found the subject, as he approached it more closely, in a very special degree a difficult one, chiefly on account of the manifoldness of the conception. At first his results became ever more and more negative. A controversy with the ' friends of light ' of the time helped him forward. Testiutn nubestnagts juvant, (jtiam luciferorum virorum importntia lu- mina. But God, he says, led him to greater clearness ; the doctrine of the Church approved itself to him. Nevertheless it was not his purpose to es- tablish the Scriptural doctrine in all its points, but only to exhibit the place which the Holy Spirit occupies in the development of the Word of God m the Old and New Testaments. There was a feeling that came to him that we were standing upon the eve of a new outpouring of the Spirit. But the wished-for dawn, he says, still held back. — His wide survey, beyond his special subject, of the whole domain of science in the corporate life of the Church, is characteristic no less of the subject than of the man. It was not given to him, however, to see the longed-for flood poured over the parched fields. His exegetical ' foundation ' (chaps, i.-iii.) moves in the old tracks. Since he shared essentially the subjective point of view of Schleiermacher and committed the final decision in the determining conceptions to philoso- phy, in spite of many remarkable flashes of insight into the Scriptures he remained fixed in the intellectualistic and ethical mode of conceiving the Holy Ghost, tho this was accompanied by many attempts to transcend Schleiermacher, but without the attaining of any unitary conception and without any effort to bring to a Scriptural solution the burning question of the personality or impersonality of the Spirit. The fourth chapter insti- tutes a comparison between the Spirit of Christianity and that of heathen- ism. The second book deals first with the relation of the Church to the Holy Spirit in general, and then enters upon a history of the doctrine, which is carried, however, only through the earliest fathers, and breaks off with a survey of the scanty harvest which the first age supplied to the suc- ceeding epochs, in which the richest development of the doctrine took place. Here the book closes. . . ."* Thus the only worthy attempt German theology has made to pro- duce a comprehensive treatise on the work of the Holy Ghost re- mains a neglected torso till to-day. If v^^e will gather up the facts to which we have thus somewhat de- sultorily called attention into a prepositional statement, we shall find ourselves compelled to recognize that the doctrine of the Holy Spirit was only slowly brought to the explicit consciousness of the Church, and has even yet taken a firm hold on the mind and con- sciousness of only a small section of the Church. To be more spe- cific, we shall need to note that the early Church busied itself with the investigation within the limits of this locus of only the doctrine * Compare the remarks of Dr. Smeaton, op. cit. , ed. 2, p. 396. BY PROFESSOR WARFIELD xxxiii of the person of the Holy Ghost — His deity and personality — and of His one function of inspirer of the prophets and apostles, while the whole doctrine of the work of the Spirit at large is a gift to the Church from the Reformation ; * and we shall need to note further that since its formulation by the Reformers this doctrine has taken deep root and borne its full fruits only in the Reformed churches, and among them in exact proportion to the loyalty of their adherence to, and the richness of their development of, the fundamental prin- ciples of the Reformed theology. Stated in its sharpest form this is as much as to say that the developed doctrine of the work of the Holy Spirit is an exclusively Reformation doctrine, and more particularly a Reformed doctrine, and more particularly still a Puritan doctrine. Wherever the fundamental principles of the Reformation have gone, it has gone ; but it has come to its full rights only among the Reformed churches, and among them only where what we have been accustomed to call " the Second Reformation " has deepened the spiritual life of the churches and cast back the Christian with special poignancy of feeling upon the grace of God alone as his sole dependence for salvation and all the goods of this life and the life to come. Indeed, it is possible to be more precise still. The doctrine of the work of the Holy spirit is a gift from John Calvin to the Church of Christ. He did not, of course, invent it. The whole of it lay spread out on the pages of Scripture with a clearness and fulness of utterance which one would think would secure that even he who ran should read it ; and doubtless he who ran did read it, and it has fed the soul of the true believer in all ages. Accordingly hints of its apprehension are found widely scattered in all Christian literature, and in particular the germs of the doctrine are spread broadcast over the pages of Augustine. Luther did not fail to lay hold upon them; Zwingli shows time and again that he had them richly in his mind ; they constituted, in very fact, one of the foundations of the * For the epoch-making character of the Reformation in the history of this doctrine cf. also Nosgen, op. cit., p. 2. "For its development, a divi- sion-line is provided simply and solely by the Reformation, and this merely because at that time only was attention intensely directed to the right mode of the application of salvation. Thus were the problems of the specially saving operation of the Holy Spirit, of the manner of His work- ing in the congpregation of believers cast into the foreground, and the theo- logical treatment of this doctrine made of ever-increasing importance to the Church of Christ, " etc. xxxh INTRODUCTORY NOTE Reformation movement, or rather they provided its vital breath. But it was Calvin who first gave them anything like systematic or adequate expression ; and it is through him and from him that they have come to be the assured possession of the Church of Christ. There is no phenomenon in doctrinal history more astonishing than the commonly entertained views as to the contribution made by John Calvin to the development of Christian doctrine. He is thought of currently as the father of doctrines, such as that of predestination and reprobation, of which he was the mere heir, — taking them as wholes over from the hands of his great master Augustine. Mean- while his real personal contributions to Christian doctrine are utterly forgotten. These are of the richest kind and can not be enumer- ated here. But it is germane to our present topic to note that at their head stand three gifts of the first value to the Church's thought and life, which we should by no means allow to pass from our gfrateful memory. It is to John Calvin that we owe that broad conception of the work of Christ which is expressed in the doc- trine of His threefold office of Prophet, Priest, and King; he was the first who presented the work of Christ under this schema, and from him it was that it has passed into a Christian commonplace. It is to John Calvin that we owe the whole conception of a science of " Christian Ethics"; he was the first to outline its idea and de- velop its principles and contents, and it remained a peculium of his followers for a century. And it is to John Calvin that we owe the first formulation of the doctrine of the work of the Holy Ghost; he himself gave it a very rich statement, developing it especially in the broad departments of "Common Grace" "Regeneration," and " the Witness of the Spirit"; and it is, as we have seen, among his spiritual descendants only that it has to this day received any adequate attention in the churches. We must guard ourselves, of course, from exaggeration in such a matter; the bare facts, when put forth without pausing to allow for the unimportant shadings, sound of themselves sufficiently like an exaggeration.* But it is simply true that these great topics received their first formulation at the hands of John Calvin ; and it is from him that the Church has derived them, and to him that it owes its thanks for them. *So, for example, a careless reading of pp. 65-77 of Pannier's "Le T^moignage du Saint-Esprit " gives the impression of exaggeration, where- as it is merely the suppression of all minor matters to emphasize the salient facts that is responsible for this effect. BY PROFESSOR VVARFIELD xxxv And if we pause to ask why the formulation of the doctrine of the work of the Spirit waited for the Reformation and for Calvin, and why the further working out of the details of this doctrine and its enrichment by the profound study of Christian minds and medita- tion of Christian hearts has come down from Calvin only to the Puri- tans, and from the Puritans to their spiritual descendants like the Free Church teachers of the Disruption era and the Dutch contest- ants for the treasures of the Reformed religion of our own day, the reasons are not far to seek. There is, in the first place, a regular order in the acquisition of doctrinal truth, inherent in the nature of the case, which therefore the Church was bound to follow in its grad- ual realization of the deposit of truth given it in the Scriptures ; and by virtue of this the Church could not successfully attack the task of assimilating and formulating the doctrine of the work of the Spirit until the foundations had been laid firmly in a clear grasp on yet more fundamental doctrines. And there are, in the next place, certain forms of doctrinal construction which leave no or only a meager place for the work of the personal Holy Spirit in the heart; and in the presence of these constructions this doctrine, even where in part apprehended and acknowledged, languishes and falls out of the interest of men. The operation of the former cause postponed the development of the doctrine of the work of the Spirit until the way was prepared for it ; and this preparation was complete only at the Reformation. The operation of the second cause has re- tarded where it has not stifled the proper assimilation of the doctrine in many parts of the Church until to-day. To be more specific. The development of the doctrinal system of Christianity in the apprehension of the Church has actually run through — as it theoretically should have run through — a regular and logical course. First, attention was absorbed in the contem- plation of the objective elements of the Christian deposit, and only afterward were the subjective elements taken into fuller con- sideration. First of all it was the Christian doctrine of God that forced itself on the attention of men, and it was not until the doctrine of the Trinity had been thoroughly assimilated that at- tention was vigorously attracted to the Christian doctrine of the God-man ; and again, it was not until the doctrine of the Person of Christ was thoroughly assimilated that attention was poignantly attracted to the Christian doctrine of sin — man's need and helpless- ness ; and only after that had been wrought fully out again could xxxvi INTRODUCTORY NOTE attention turn to the objective provision to meet man's needs in the work of Christ; and again, only after that to the subjective pro- vision to meet his needs in the work of the Spirit. This is the log- ical order of development, and it is the actual order in which the Church has slowly and amid the throes of all sorts of conflicts — with the world and with its own slowness to believe all that the prophets have written — worked its way into the whole truth re- vealed to it in the Word. The order is, it will be observed, The- ology, Christology, Anthropology (Hamartialogy), Impetration of Redemption, Application of Redemption; and in the nature of the case the topics that fall under the rubric of the application of redemption could not be solidly investigated until the basis had been laid for them in the assimilation of the preceding topics. We have connected the great names of Athanasius and his worthy successors who fought out the Christological disputes, of Augustine and of Anselm, with the precedent stages of this development. It was the leaders of the Reformation who were called on to add the capstone to the structure by working out the facts as to the applica- tion of redemption to the soul of man through the Holy Spirit. Some elements of the doctrine of the Spirit are indeed implicated in earlier discussions. For example, the deity and personality of the Spirit — the whole doctrine of His person — was a part of the doctrine of the Trinity, and this accordingly became a topic for early debate, and patristic literature is rich in discussions of it. The authority of Scripture was fundamental to the whole doctrinal discussion, and the doctrine of the inspiration of the prophets and apostles by the Spirit was therefore asserted from the beginning with great empha- sis. In the determination of man's need in the Pelagian controversy much was necessarily determined about " Grace," — its necessity, its prevenience, its efficacy, its indefectibility, — and in this much was anticipated of what was afterward to be more orderly developed in the doctrine of the interior work of the Spirit ; and accordingly there is much in Augustine which preadumbrates the determination of later times. But even in Augustine there is a vagueness and tentativeness in the treatment of these topics which advises us that while the facts relatively to man and his needs and the methods of God's working upon him to salvation are firmly grasped, these same facts relatively to the personal activities of the Spirit as yet await their full assimilation. Another step had yet to be taken : the Church needed to wait yet for Anselm to set on foot the final de- BY PROFESSOR WARFIELD xxxvii termination of the doctrine of a vicarious atonement; and only when time had been given for its assimilation, at length men's minds were able to take the final step. Then Luther rose to pro- claim justification by faith, and Calvin to set forth with his marvel- ous balance the whole doctrine of the work of the Spirit in applying salvation to the soul. In this matter, too, the fulness of the times needed to be waited for; and when the fulness of the times came the men were ready for their task and the Church was ready for their work. And in this collocation we find a portion of the secret of the immense upheaval of the Reformation. Unfortunately, however, the Church was not ready in all its parts alike for the new step in doctrinal development. This was, of course, in the nature of the case : for the development of doctrine takes place naturally in a matrix of old and hardened partial concep- tions, and can make its way only by means of a conflict of opinion. All Arians did not disappear immediately after the Council of Nice ; on the contrary, for an age they seemed destined to rule the Church. The decree of Chalcedon did not at once quiet all Christological de- bate, or do away with all Christological error. There were remain- ders of Pelagianism that outlived Augustine ; and indeed that after the Synod of Orange began to make headway against the truth. Anselm's construction of the atonement only slowly worked its way into the hearts of men. And so, when Calvin had for the first time for- mulated the fuller and more precise doctrine of the work of the Spirit, there were antagonistic forces in the world which crowded upon it and curtailed its influence and clogged its advance in the apprehen- sion of men. In general, these may be said to be two : the sacerdotal tendency on the one hand and the libertarian tendency on the other. The sacerdotal tendency was entrenched in the old Church ; from which the Reformers were extruded indeed by the very force of the new leaven of their individualism of spiritual life. That Church was therefore impervious to the newly formulated doctrine of the work of the Spirit. To it the Church was the depository of grace, the sac- raments were its indispensable vehicle, and the administration of it lay in the hands of human agents. Wherever this sacramentarian- ism went, in however small a measure, it tended so far to distract men's attention from the Spirit of God and to focus it on the 7nedia of His working; and wherever it has entrenched itself, there the study of the work of the Spirit has accordingly more or less languished. It is easy indeed to say that the Spirit stands behind the sacraments xxxviii INTRODUCTORY NOTE and is operative in the sacraments ; as a matter of fact, the sacra- ments tend, in all such cases, to absorb the attention, and the theo- retical explanations of their efficacy as vested in the Spirit's energy tend to pass out of the vivid interest of men. The libertarian tendency, on the other hand, was the nerve of the old semi-Pelagi- anism vv^hich in Thomism and Tridentinism became in a modified form the formal doctrine of the Church of Rome ; and in various forms it soon began to seep also into and to trouble the churches of the Reformation — first the Lutheran and after that also the Re- formed. To it, the will of man was in greater or less measure the decisive factor in the subjective reception of salvation; and in pro- portion as it was more or less developed or more or less fully ap- plied, interest in the doctrine of the subjective work of the Spirit languished, and in these circles too men's minds were to that degree distracted from the study of the doctrine of the work of the Spirit, and tended to focus themselves on the autocracy of the human will and its native or renewed ability to obey God and seek and find com- munion with Him. No doubt here too it is easy to point to the func- tion which is still allowed the Spirit, in most at least of the theo- logical constructions on this basis. But the practical effect has been that just in proportion as the autocracy of the human will in salva- tion has been emphasized, the interest in the internal work of the Spirit has declined. When we take into consideration the wide- spread influence that has been attained even in the Protestant world by these two antagonistic tendencies, we shall cease to wonder at the widespread neglect that has befallen the doctrine of the work of the Spirit. And we shall have prosecuted our inquiry but a little way before we become aware how entirely these facts account for the phenomena before us : how completely it is true that interest in the doctrine of the work of the Spirit has failed just in those regions and just in those epochs in which either sacramentarian or libertarian opinions have ruled; and how true it is that engagement with this doctrine has been intense only along the banks of that narrow stream of religious life and thought the keynote of which has been the soli Deo gloria in all its fulness of meaning. With this key in hand the mysteries of the history of this doctrine in the Church are at once solved for us. One of the chief claims to our attention which Dr. Kuyper's book makes, therefore, is rooted in the fact that it is a product of a great religious movement in the Dutch churches. This is not the BY PROFESSOR WARFIELD xxxix place to give a history of that movement. We have all watched it with the intensest interest, from the rise of the Free Churches to the union with them of the new element from the Doleantie. We have lacked no proof that it was a movement of exceptional spir- itual depth; but had there lacked any such proof, it would be supplied by the appearance of this book out of its heart. Wher- ever men are busying themselves with holy and happy meditations on the Holy Ghost and His work, it is safe to say the foundations of a true spiritual life are laid, and the structure of a rich spiritual life is rising. The mere fact that a book of this character offers it- self as one of the products of this movement attracts us to it ; and the nature of the work itself — its solidity of thought and its depth of spiritual apprehension — brightens our hopes for the future of the churches in which it has had its birth. Only a spiritually minded Church provides a soil in which a literature of the Spirit can grow. There are some who will miss in the book what they are accustomed to call "scientific" character;* it has no lack cer- tainly of scientific exactitude of conception, and if it seems to any to lack " scientific " form, it assuredly has a quality which is better than anything that even a "scientific" form could give it — it is a religious book. It is the product of a religious heart, and it leads the reader to a religious contemplation of the great facts of the Spirit's working. May it bring to all, into whose hands it finds its way in this fresh vehicle of a new language, an abiding and happy sense of rest on and in God the Holy Ghost, the Author and Lord of all life, to whom in our heart of hearts we may pray: " Veni, Creator Spiritus^ Spiritus recreator, Tu deus, tu datus ccelitus, Tu donutn, tu donator." Princeton Theological Seminary, April 23, 1900. *Thus Beversluis, op. cit., speaks of it as Dr. Kuyper's bulky book, which "has no scientific value," the it is full of fine passages auO treats the subject in a many-sided way. THE WORK OF THE HOLY SPIRIT VOLUME ONE The Work of the Holy Spirit in the Church as a Whole Ipirst Cbapter, INTRODUCTION. I. Careful Treatment Required. " Who hath also given unto us His Holy Spirit." — I Thess. iv. 8. The need of divine guidance is never more deeply felt than when one undertakes to give instruction in the work of the Holy Spirit — so unspeakably tender is the subject, touching the inmost secrets of God and the soul's deepest mysteries. We shield instinctively the intimacies of kindred and friends from intrusive observation, and nothing hurts the sensitive heart more than the rude exposure of that which should not be unveiled, being beautiful only in the retirement of the home circle. Greater delicacy befits our approach to the holy mystery of our soul's inti- macy with the living God. Indeed, we can scarcely find words to express it, for it touches a domain far below the social life where language is formed and usage determines the meaning of words. Glimpses of this life have been revealed, but the greater part has been withheld. It is like the life of Him who did not cry, nor lift up nor cause His voice to be heard in the street. And that which was heard was whispered rather than spoken — a soul-breath, soft but voiceless, or rather a radiating of the soul's own blessed warmth. Sometimes the stillness has been broken by a cry or a raptured shout ; but there has been mainly a silent working, a min- istering of stern rebuke or of sweet comfort by that wonderful Being in the Holy Trinity whom with stammering tongue we adore as the Holy Spirit. Spiritual experience can furnish no basis for instruction; for such experience rests on that which took place in our own soul. 4 INTRODUCTION Certainly this has value, influence, voice in the matter. But what guarantees correctness and fidelity in interpreting such experience? And again, how can we distinguish its various sources — from our- selves, from without, or from the Holy Spirit? The twofold ques- tion will ever hold : Is our experience shared by others, and may it not be vitiated by what is in us sinful and spiritually abnormal? Altho there is no subject in whose treatment the soul inclines more to draw upon its own experience, there is none that demands more that our sole source of knowledge be the Word given us by the Holy Spirit. After that, human experience may be heard, at- testing what the lips have confessed ; even affording glimpses into the Spirit's blessed mysteries, which are unspeakable and of which the Scripture therefore does not speak. But this can not be the ground of instruction to others. The Church of Christ assuredly presents abundant spiritual utter- ance in hymn and spiritual song; in homilies hortatory and conso- ling; in sober confession or outbursts of souls wellnigh overwhelmed by the floods of persecution and martyrdom. But even this can not be the foundation of knowledge concerning the work of the Holy Spirit. The following reasons will make this apparent : First, The difficulty of discriminating between the men and women whose experience we consider pure and healthy, and those whose testimony we put aside as strained and unhealthful. Luther frequently spoke of his experience, and so did Caspar Schwenkfeld, the dangerous fanatic. But what is our warrant for approving the utterances of the great Reformer and warning against those of the Silesian nobleman? For evidently the testimony of the two men can not be equally true. Luther condemned as a lie what Schwenk- feld commended as a highly spiritual attainment. Second, The testimony of believers presents only the dim out- lines of the work of the Holy Spirit. Their voices are faint as com- ing from an unknown realm, and their broken speech is intelligible only when we, initiated by the Holy Spirit, can interpret it from our own experience. Otherwise we hear, but fail to understand; we listen, but receive no information. Only he that hath ears can hear what the Spirit has spoken secretly to these children of God. Third, Among those Christian heroes whose testimony we receive, some speak clearly, truthfully, forcibly, others confusedly as tho they were groping in the dark. Whence the difference? Closer CAREFUL TREATMENT REQUIRED $ examination shows that the former have borrowed all their speech from the Word of God, while the others tried to add to it something novel that promised to be great, but proved only bubbles, quickly dissolved, leaving no trace. Last, When, on the other hand, in this treasury of Christian testi- mony we find some truth better developed, more clearly expressed, more aptly illustrated than in Scripture; or, in other words, when the ore of the Sacred Scripture has been melted in the crucible of the mortal anguish of the Church of God, and cast into more per- manent forms, then we always discover in such forms certain _/?!xves. Spiritual life expresses itself otherwise among the eamest- souled Lapps and Finns than among the light-hearted French. The rugged Scotchman pours out his overflowing heart in a different way from that of the emotional German. Yea, more striking still, some preacher has obtained a marked influence upon the souls of men of a certain locality ; an exhorter has got hold of the hearts of the people ; or some mother in Israel has sent forth her word among her neighbors; and what do we dis- cover? That in that whole region we meet no other expressions of spiritual life than those coined by that preacher, that exhorter, that mother in Israel. This shows that the language, the very words and forms in which the soul expresses itself, are largely borrowed, and spring but rarely from one's own spiritual consciousness ; and so do not insure the correctness of their interpretation of the soul's ex- perience. And when such heroes as Augustine, Thomas, Luther, Calvin, and others present us something strikingly original, then we en- counter difficulty in understanding their strong and vigorous testi- mony. For the individuality of these choice vessels is so marked that, unless sifted and tested, we can not fully comprehend them. All this shows that the supply of knowledge concerning the work of the Holy Spirit, which, judging superficially, was to gush forth from the deep wells of Christian experience, yields but a few drops. Hence for the knowledge of the subject we must return to that wondrous Word of God which as a mystery of mysteries lies still uncomprehended in the Church, seemingly dead as a stone, but a stone that strikes fire. Who has not seen its scintillating sparks? Where is the child of God whose heart has not been kindled by the fire of that Word? 6 INTRODUCTION But Scripture sheds scant light on the work of the Holy Spirit. For proof, see how much the Old Testament says of the Messiah and how comparatively little of the Holy Spirit. The little circle of saints, Mary, Simeon, Anna, John, who, standing in the vesti- bule of the New Testament, could scan the horizon of the Old Testament revelation with a glance — how much they knew of the Person of the Promised Deliverer, and how little of the Holy Spirit! Even including all the New Testament teachings, how scanty is the light upon the work of the Holy Spirit compared with that upon the work of Christ! And this is quite natural, and could not be otherwise, for Christ is the Word made Flesh, having visible, well-defined form, in which we recognize our own, that of a man, whose outlines follow the di- rection of our own being. Christ can be seen and heard ; once men's hands could even handle the Word of Life. But the Holy Spirit is entirely different. Of Him nothing appears in visible form; He never steps out from the intangible void. Hovering, undefined, incomprehensible, He remains a mystery. He is as the wind! We hear its sound, but can not tell whence it cometh and whither it goeth. Eye can not see Him, ear can not hear Him, much less the hand handle Him. There are, indeed, symbolic signs and appear- ances: a dove, tongues of fire, the sound of a rushing, mighty wind, a breathing from the holy lips of Jesus, a laying on of hands, a speaking with foreign tongfues. But of all this nothing remains ; nothing lingers behind, not even the trace of a footprint. And after the signs have disappeared, His being remains just as puz- zling, mysterious, and distant as ever. So almost all the divine in- struction concerning the Holy Spirit is likewise obscure, intelligible only so far as He makes it clear to the eye of the favored soul. We know that the same may be said of Christ's work, whose real import is apprehended solely by the spiritually enlightened, who behold the eternal wonders of the Cross. And yet what won- derful fascination is there even for a little child in the story of the manger in Bethlehem, of the Transfiguration, of Gabbatha and Golgotha. How easily can we interest him by telling of the heavenly Father who numbereth the hairs of his head, arrayeth the lilies of the field, feedeth the sparrows on the house-top. But is it possible so to engage his attention for the Person of the Holy Spirit? The same is true of the unregenerate : they are not unwill- ing to speak of the heavenly Father ; many speak feelingly of the CAREFUL TREATMENT REQUIRED 7 Manger and of the Cross. But do they ever speak of the Holy Spirit? They can not; the subject has no hold upon them. The Spirit of God is so holily sensitive that naturally He withdraws from the irreverent gaze of the uninitiated. Christ has fully revealed Himself. It was the love and divine compassion of the Son. But the Holy Spirit has not done so. It is His saving faithfulness to meet us only in the secret place of His love. This causes another difficulty. Because of His unrevealed char- acter the Church has taught and studied the Spirit's work much less than Christ's, and has attained much less clearness in its theo- logical discussion. We might say, since He gave the Word and illuminated the Church, He spoke much more of the Father and the Son than of Himself; not as tho it had been selfish to speak more of Himself — for sinful selfishness is inconceivable in regard to Him — but He must reveal the Father and the Son before He could lead us into the more intimate fellowship with Himself. This is the reason that there is so little preaching on the subject ; that text-books on Systematic Theology rarely treat it separately ; that Pentecost (the feast of the Holy Spirit) appeals to the churches and animates them much less than Christmas or Easter, that un- happily many ministers, otherwise faithful, advance many erro- neous view^s upon this subject — a fact of which they and the churches seem unconscious. Hence special discussion of the theme deserves attention. That it requires great caution and delicate treatment need not be said. It is our prayer that the discussion may evince such great care and caution as is required, and that our Christian readers may receive our feeble efforts with that love which suffereth long. II. Two Standpoints. " By the word of the Lord were the heavens made ; and all the host of them by the breath of His mouth." — Psalm xxxiii. 6. The work of the Holy Spirit that most concerns us is the renew- ing of the elect after the ijnage of God. And this is not all. It even savors of selfishness and irreverence to make this so prominent, as tho it were His only work. The redeemed.are not sanctified without Christ, who is made to them sanctification ; hence the work of the Spirit must embrace the Incarnation of the Word and the work of the Messiah. But the work of Messiah involves preparatory working in the Patriarchs and Prophets of Israel, and later activity in the Apostles, i.e., the fore- shadowing of the Eternal Word in Scripture. Likewise this revela- tion involves the conditions of man's nature and the historical de- velopment of the race; hence the Holy Spirit is concerned in the formation of the human mind and the unfolding of the spirit of humanity. Lastly, man's condition depends on that of the earth; the influences of sun, moon, and stars ; the elemental motions ; and no less on the actions of spirits, be they angels or demons from other spheres. Wherefore the Spirit's work must touch the entire host of heaven and earth. To avoid a mechanical idea of His work as tho it began and ended at random, like piece-work in a factory, it must not be deter- mined nor limited till it extends to all the influences that affect the sanctification of the Church. The Holy Spirit is God, therefore sovereign ; hence He can not depend on these influences, but com- pletely controls them. For this He must be able to operate them ; so His work must be honored /// all the host of heaven, in man and in his history, in the preparation of Scripture, in the Incarnation of tJie Word, in the salvation of the elect. But this is not all. The final salvation of the elect is not the TWO STANDPOINTS 9 last link in the chain of events. The hour that completes their re- demption will be the hour of reckoning for all creation. The Bib- lical revelation of Christ's return is not a mere pageant closing this preliminary dispensation, but the great and notable event, the con- summation of all before, the catastrophe whereby all that is shall receive its due. In that great and notable day the elements with commotion and awful change shall be combined into a new heaven and earth, i.e., out of these burning elements shall emerge the real beauty and glory of God's original purpose. Then all ill, misery, plague, every thing unholy, every demon, every spirit turned against God shall become truly hellish ; that is, every thing ungodly shall re- ceive its due, i.e., a world in which sin has absolute sway. For what is hell other than a realm in which unholiness works without restraint in body and soul? Then man's personality will recover the unity destroyed by death, and God will grant His redeemed the fruition of that blest hope confessed on earth amid conflict and affliction in the words: " I believe in the resurrection of the body." Then shall Christ triumph over every power of Satan, sin, and death, and thus receive His due as the Christ. Then wheat and tares shall be separated ; the mingling shall cease, and the hope of God's people become sight ; the martyr shall be in rapture and his executioner in torment. Then, too, shall the veil be drawn from the Jerusalem that is above. The clouds shall be dispelled that kept us from seeing that God was righteous in all His judgments; then the wisdom and glory of all His counsels shall be vindicated both by Satan and his own in the pit, and by Christ and His re-, deemed in the city of our God, and the Lord be glorious in all His works. Thus radiating from the sanctification of the redeemed, we see the work of the Spirit embracing in past ages the Incarnation, the preparation of Scripture, the forming of man and the universe ; and, extending into the ages, the Lord's return, the final judgment, and that last cataclysm that shall separate heaven from hell forever. This standpoint precludes our viewing the work of the Spirit from that of the salvation of the redeemed. Our spiritual horizon widens; for the chief thing is not that the elect be fully saved, but that God be justified in all His works and glorified through judgment. To all who acknowledge that " He that believeth not on the Son 1 lo INTRODUCTION shall not see life, but the wrath of God abiding on him," this must be the only true standpoint. If we subscribe this awful statement, not having lost our way in the labyrinth of a so-called conditional immortality, which actually annihilates man, then how can we dream of a state of perfect bliss for the elect as long as the lost ones are being tormented by the worm that dieth not? Is there no more love or compassion in our hearts? Can we fancy ourselves for a single moment enjoying heaven's bliss while the fire is not quenched and no lighted torch is carried into the outer darkness? To make the bliss of the elect the final end of all things while Satan still roars in the bottomless pit is to annihilate the very thought of such bliss. Love suffers not only when a human being is in pain, but even when an animal is in distress ; how much more when an angel gnashes his teeth in torture, and that angel beautiful and glorious as Satan was before his fall. And yet the very men- tion of Satan unconsciously lifts from our hearts the burden of fellow pain, suffering, and compassion; for we feel immediately that the knowledge of Satan's suffering in the pit does not in the least appeal to our compassion. On the contrary, to believe that Satan exists but not in utter misery were a wound to our profound sense of justice. And this is the point : to conceive of the blessedness of a soul not in absolute union with Christ is unholy madness. No one but Christ is blessed, and no man can be blessed but he who is vitally one with Christ — Christ in him and he in Christ. Equally it is un- holy madness to conceive of man or angel lost in hell unless he has identified himself with Satan, having become morally one with him. The conception of a soul in hell not morally one with Satan is the most appalling cruelty from which every noble heart recoils with horror. Every child of God is furious at Satan. Satan is simply unbear- able to him. In his inward man (however unfaithful his nature may be) there is bitter enmity, implacable hatred against Satan. Hence it satisfies our holiest conscience to know that Satan is in the bottomless pit. To encourage a plea for him in the heart were treason against God. Sharp agony may pierce his soul like a dag- ger for the unspeakable depth of his fall, yet as Satan, author of all that is demoniac and fiendish, who has bruised the heel of the Son of God, he can never move our hearts. TWO STANDPOINTS il Why? What is the sole, deep reason why as regards Satan com- passion is dead, hatred is right, and love would be blameworthy? Is it not that we never can look upon Satan without remembering that he is the adversary of our God, the mortal enemy of our Christ? Were it not for that we might weep for him. But now our allegiance to God tells us that such weeping would be treason against our King. Only by measuring the end of things by what belongs to God can we stand right in this matter. We can view the matter of the redeemed and the lost from the right standpoint only when we subordinate both to that which is highest, i.e., the glory of God. Measured by Him, we can conceive of the redeemed in a state of bliss, enthroned, yet not in danger of pride ; since it was and is and ever shall be by His sovereign grace alone. But also measured by Him, we can think of those identified with Satan, joyless and mis- erable, without once hurting the sense of justice in the heart of the upright; for to be mercifully inclined toward Satan is impossible to him who loves God with love deep and everlasting. And such i.s the love of the redeemed. Considered from this far superior standpoint, the work of the Holy Spirit necessarily assumes a different aspect. Now we can no more say that His work is the sanctification of the elect, with all that precedes and follows; but we confess that it is the vindication of the counsel of God with all that pertains thereto, from the creation and throughout the ages, unto the coming of the Lord Jesus Christ, and onward throughout eternitj', both in heaven and in hell. The difference between these two viewpoints can easily be ap- preciated. According to the first, the work of the Holy Spirit is only subordinate. Unfortunately man is fallen; hence he is dis- eased. Since he is impure and unholy, even subject to death it- self, the Holy Spirit must purify and sanctify him. This implies, first, that had man not sinned the Holy Spirit would have had no work. Second, that when the work of sanctification is finished. His activity will cease. According to the correct viewpoint, the work of the Spirit is continuous and perpetual, beginni.ng with the crea- tion, continuing throughout eternity, begun even before sin first appeared. It may be objected that some time ago the author emphatically opposed the idea that Christ would have come into the world even 12 INTRODUCTION if sin had not entered in; and that now he affirms with equal em- phasis that the Holy Spirit would have wrought in the world and in man if the latter had remained sinless. The answer is very simple. If Christ had not appeared in His capacity of Messiah, He would have had, as the Son, the Second Person in the Godhead, His own divine sphere of action, seeing that all things consist through Him. On the contrary, if the work of the Holy Spirit were confined to the sanctification of the re- deemed, He would be absolutely inactive if sin had not entered into the world. And since this would be equal to a denial of His Godhead, it can not for a moment be tolerated. By occupying this superior viewpoint, we apply to the work of the Holy Spirit the fundamental principle of the Reformed churches : " That all things must be measured by the glory of God." III. The Indwelling- and Outgoing Works of God. "And all the host of them by the breath of His mouth." — Psalm xxxiii. 6. The thorough and clear-headed theologians of the most flourish- ing periods of the Church used to distinguish between the indwell- ing and outgoing works of God. The same distinction exists to some extent in nature. The lion watching his prey differs widely from the lion resting among his whelps. See the blazing eye, the lifted head, the strained muscles and panting breath. One can see that the crouching lion is labor- ing intensely. Yet the act is now only in contemplation. The heat and the ferment, the nerve-tension are all within. A terrible deed is about to be done, but it is still under restraint, until he pounces with thundering roar upon his unsuspecting victim, bury- ing his fangs deep into the quivering flesh. We find the same distinction in finer form among men. When a storm has raged at sea, and the fate of the absent fishing-smacks that are expected to return with the tide is uncertain, a fisher- man's awe-stricken wife sits on the brow of the sand-hill watching and waiting in speechless suspense. As she waits, her heart and soul labor in prayer; the nerves are tense, the blood runs fast, and breathing is almost suspended. Yet there is no outward act; only labor within. But on the safe return of the smacks, when she sees her own, her burdened heart finds relief in a cry of joy. Or, taking examples from the more ordinary walks of life, com- pare the student, the scholar, the inventor thinking out his new invention, the architect forming his plans, the general studying his opportunities, the sturdy sailor nimbly climbing the mast of his ship, or yonder blacksmith raising the sledge to strike the glowing iron upon the anvil with concentrated muscular force. Judging superficially, one would say the blacksmith and sailor work, but the men of learning are idle. Yet he that looks beneath the sur- t4 INTRODUCTION face knows better than this. For if those men perform no apparent manual labor, they work with brain, nerve, and blood; yet since those organs are more delicate than hand or foot, their invisible, indwelling work is much more exhausting. With all their labor the blacksmith and sailor are pictures of health, while the men of mental force, apparently idle among their folios, are pale from ex- haustion, their vitality being almost consumed by their intense application. Applying this distinction without its human limitations to the works of the Lord, we find that the outgoing works of God had their beginning when God created the heavens and the earth; and that before that moment which marks the birth of time, nothing existed but God working within Himself. Hence this twofold operation : The first, externally manifest, known to us in the acts of creating, upholding, and directing all things — acts that, compared to those of eternity, seem to have begun but yesterday ; for what are thousands of years in the presence of the eternal ages? '^\iq second, behind and underneath the first — an operation not begun nor ended, but eternal like Himself; deeper, richer, fuller, yet not manifested, hidden within Him, which we therefore designate indwelling. Altho these two operations can scarcely be separated — for there never was one manifest without which was not first completed ^vith- in — yet the difference is strongly marked and easily recognized. The indwelling works of God are from eternity, the outgoing belong to ti/ne. The former precede, the latter fiollow. The foundation of that which becomes visible lies in that which remains invisible. The light itself is hidden, it is the radiation only that appears. The Scripture, speaking of the indwelling works of God.'says: " The counsel of the Lord standeth for ever, and the thoughts of His heart to all generations" (Psalm xxiii. 1 1). Since in God heart and thought have no separate existence, but His undivided Essence thinks, feels, and wills, we learn from this significant passage that the Being of God works in Himself from all eternity. This answers the oft-repeated and foolish question, " What did God do before He created the universe?" which is as unreason.ing as to ask what the thinker did before he expressed his thoughts, or the architect before he built the house ! God's indwelling works, which are from everlasting to everlast- ing, are not insignificant, but surpass His outgoing works in depth and strength as the student's thinking and the sufferer's anguish INDWELLING AND OUTGOING WORKS OF GOD 15 surpass their strongest utterances in intensity. " Could I but weep," says the afflicted one, " how much more easily could I bear my son-ow!" And what are tears but the outward expression of grief, relieving the pain and strain of the heart? Or think of the child-^^ar/Vi!^ of the mother before delivery. It is said of the de- cree that it hath " brought forth" (Zeph. ii. 2), which signifies that the phenomenon is only the result of preparation hidden from the eye, but more real than the production, and without which there would be nothing to bring forth. Thus the expression of our earlier theologians is justified, and the difference between the indwelling and the outgoing works is patent. Accordingly the indwelling works of God are the activities of His Being, without the distinction of Persons; while His outgoing works admit and to some extent demand this distinction: e.g., the common and well-known distinguishing of the Father's work as that of creation, the Son's as that of redemption, and the Holy Spirit's as that of sanctification relates only to God's outgoing works. While these operations — creation, redemption, and sanctifi- cation— are hidden in the thoughts of His heart. His counsel, and His Being, it is Father, Son, and Holy Ghost who creates, Father, Son, and Holy Ghost who redeems. Father, Son, and Holy Ghost who sanctifies, without any division or distinction of activities. The rays of light hidden in the sun are indivisible and indistinguishable until they radiate ; so in the Being of God the indwelling working is one and undivided ; His personal glories remain invisible until revealed in His outgoing works. A stream is one until it falls over the precipice and divides into many drops. So is the life of God one and undivided while hidden within Himself; but when it is poured out into created things its colors stand revealed. As, there- fore, the indwelling works of the Holy Spirit are common to the three Persons of the Godhead, we do not discuss them, but treat only those operations that bear the personal marks of His outgoing works. But we do not mean to teach that the distinction of the personal attributes of Father, Son, and Holy Ghost did not exist in the divine Being, but originated only in His outward activities. The distinction of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is the divine i6 INTRODUCTION characteristic of the Eternal Being, His mode of subsistence, His deepest foundation ; to think of Him without that distinction would be absurd. Indeed, in the divine and eternal economy of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, each of the divine Persons lives and loves and lauds according to His own personal characteristics, so that the Father remains Father toward the Son, and the Son remains Son toward the Father, and the Holy Spirit proceeds from both. It is right to ask how this agrees with the statement made above, that the indwelling works of God belong, without distinction of Persons, to Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, and are therefore the works of the divine Being. The answer is found in the careful dis- tinction of the twofold nature of the indwelling works of God. Some operations in the divine Being are destined to be revealed in time ; others will remain forever unrevealed. The former con- cern the creation ; the latter, only the relations of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Take, for instance, election and eternal generation. Both are indwelling operations of God, but with marked difference. The Father's eternal generation of the Son can never be revealed, but must ever be the mystery of the Godhead; while election belongs as decree to the indwelling works of God, yet is destined in the fulness of time to become manifest in the call of the elect. Regarding the permanetitiy indwelling works of God that do not relate to the creature, but flow from the mutual relation of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, the distinctive characteristics of the three Persons must be kept in view. But with those that are to become manifest, relating to the creature, this distinction disappears. Here the rule applies that all indwelling works are activities of the divine Being without distinction of Person's. To illustrate : In the home there are two kinds of activities one flow- ing from the mutual relation of parents and children, another per- taining to the social life. In the former the distinction between parents and children is never ignored ; in the latter, if the relation be normal, neither the father nor the children act alone, but the fajnily as a whole. Even so in the holy, mysterious economy of the divine Being, every operation of the Father upon the Son and of both upon the Holy Spirit is distinct ; but in every outgoing act it is always the one divine Being, the thoughts of whose heart are for all His creatures. On that account the natural man knows no more than that he has to do with a God. The Unitarians, denying the Holy Trinity, have never reached INDWELLING AND OUTGOING WORKS OF GOD 17 anything higher than that which can be seen by the light of the darkened human understanding. We often discover that many baptized with water but not with the Holy Spirit speak of the Triune God because others do. For themselves they know only that He is God. This is why the discriminating knowledge of the Triune God can not illuminate the soul until the light of redemp- tion shines within, and the Day-star arises in man's heart. Our Confession correctly expresses this, saying: "All this we know as well from the testimony of Holy Writ as from their operations, and chiefly by those we feel in ourselves" rart. ix.). 2 IV. The Work of the Holy Spirit Distingfuished. "And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters." — Gen. i. 2. What, in general, is the work of the Holy Spirit as distinguished from that of the Father and of the Son? Not that every believer needs to know these distinctions in all particulars. The existence of faith does not depend upon intellec- tual distinctions. The main question is not whether we can dis- tinguish the work of the Father from that of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, but whether we have experienced their gracious opera- tions. The root of the matter, not the natue, decides. Must we then slightly value a clear understanding of sacred things? Shall we deem it superfluous and call its great matters hair-splitting questions? By no means. The human mind searches every department of life. Scientists deem it an honor to spend their lives in analyzing the minutest plants and insects, describing every particular, naming every member of the dissected organism. Their work is never called "hair-splittings," but is distinguished as " scientific research." And rightly so, for without differentiation there can be no insight, and without insight there can bfe no thorough acquaintance with the subject. Why, then, call this same desire unprofitable when it directs the attention not to the creature, but to the Lord God our Creator? Can there be any worthier object of mental application than the eternal God? Is it right and proper to insist upon correct discrimi- nation in every other sphere of knowledge, and yet regarding the knowledge of God to be satisfied with generalities and confused views? Has God not invited us to share the intellectual knowledge of His Being? Has He not given us His Word? And does not the Word illumine the mysteries of His Being, His attributes. His per- fections, His virtues, and the mode of His subsistence? If we aspired to penetrate into things too high for us, or to unveil the WORK OF THE HOLY SPIRIT DISTINGUISHED 19 unrevealed, reverence would require us to resist such audacity. But since we aim in godly fear to listen to Scripture, and to receive the proffered knowledge of the deep things of God, there can be no room for objection. We would say rather to those who frown upon such effort : " Ye can discern the face of the sky, but ye can not discern the face of your Father in heaven." Hence the question concerning the work of the Holy Spirit as distinguished from that of the Father and of the Son is quite legiti- mate and necessary. It is deplorable that many of God's children have confused con- ceptions in this respect. They can not distinguish the works of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit. Even in prayer they use the divine names indiscriminately. Altho the Holy Spirit is explicitly called the Comforter, yet they seek comfort mostly from the Father or the Son, unable to say why and what in sense the Holy Spirit is especially called Comforter. The early Church already felt the need of clear and exact dis- tinctions in this matter; and the great thinkers and Christian phi- losophers whom God gave to the Church, especially the Eastern Fathers, expended their best powers largely upon this subject. They saw very clearly that unless the Church learned to distinguish the works of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, its confession of the Holy Trinity could be but a dead sound. Compelled not by love of subtleties, but by the necessity of the Church, they undertook to study these distinctions. And God let heretics vex His Church so as to arouse the mind by conflict, and to lead it to search God's Word. So we are not pioneers exploring a new field. The writing of these articles can so impress those alone who are ignorant of the historical treasures of the Church. We propose simply to cause the light, which for so many ages shed its clear and comforting rays upon the Church, to reenter the windows, and thus by deeper knowledge to increase its inward strength. We begin with the general distinction: That in every work effected by Father, Son, and Holy Ghost in common, the power to bring forth proceeds from the Father; the power /^ arrange from the Son ; the power to perfect from the Holy Spirit. In I Cor. viii. 6, St. Paul teaches that : " There is but one God the Father, of wJwm are all things, and one Lord Jesus Christ l^ 20 INTRODUCTION who7n are all things." Here we have two prepositions: of whom, and by whom. But in Rom. xi. 38 he adds another: " For of Him and through Him and to Him are all things." The operation here spoken of is threefold : first, that by which all things are originated {of Him) ; second, that by which all things consist {through Him) ; third, that by which all things attain their final destiny {to Him). In connection with this clear, apostolic distinction the great teachers of the Church, after the fifth century, used to distinguish the operations of the Persons of the Trinity by saying that the operation whereby all things originated proceeds from the Father ; that whereby they received consistency from the Son; and that whereby they were led to their destiny from the Holy Spirit. These clear thinkers taught that this distinction was in line with that of the Persons. Thus the Father is father. He generates the Son. And the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son. Hence the peculiar feature of the First Person is evidently that He is the Source and Fountain not only of the material creation, but of its very conception ; of all that was and is and ever shall be. The peculiarity of the Second Person lies evidently not in genera- ting, but in being generated. One is a son by being generated. Hence since all things proceed from the Father, nothing can proceed from the Son. The source of all things is not in the Son. Yet He adds a work of creation to that which is coming into exist- ence ; for the Holy Spirit proceeds also from Him ; but not from Him alone, but from the Father and the Son, and that in such a way that the procession from the Son is due to His sameness of essence with the Father. The Scripture agrees with this in teaching that the Father cre- ated all things by the Son, and that without Him was nothing made that was made. For the difference between "created by" and " created from," we refer to Col. i. 17 : " By Him all things consist," i.e., by Him they hold together. Heb. i. 3 is even clearer, saying that the Son upholds all things by the Word of His po^ver. This shows that as the essentials of the creature's existence proceed from the Father as Fountain of all, so the forming, putting together, and arranging of its constituents are the proper work of the Son. If we were reverently to compare God's work to that of man we would say : A king proposes to build a palace. This requires not only material, labor, and plans, but also putting together and WORK OF THE HOLY SPIRIT DISTINGUISHED 21 arranging of the materials according to the plans. The king fur- nishes the materials and plans, the builder constructs the palace. Who, then, built it? Neither the king nor the builder alone; but the builder erects it out of the royal treasure. This expresses the relation between Father and Son in this respect as far as human relations can illustrate the divine. In the construction of the universe two operations appear: first, the causative, which produces the materials, forces, and plans; second, the constructive, which with these forces forms and orders the mate- rials according to the plan. And as the first proceeds from the Father, so does the second from the Son. The Father is the Royal Source of the necessary materials and powers; and the Son as the Builder constructs all things with them according to the counsel of God If the Father and the Son existed independently, such cooperation would be impossible. But since the Father generates the Son, and by virtue of that generation the Son contams the entire Being of the Father, there can be no division of Being, and only the distinction of Persons remains. For the entire wisdom and power whereby the Son gives consistency to all is generated m Him by the Father; while the counsel which designed all is a determination by the Father of that divine wisdom which He as Father generates in the Son. For the Son is forever the effulgence of the Father's glory, and the express image of His Person-Heb. This does not complete the work of creation. The creature is made not simply to exist or to adorn some niche in the universe like a statue. Rather was everything created with a purpose and a destiny; and our creation will be complete only when we have become what God designed. Hence Gen. ii. 3 says: "God rested from all His work which He had created to make it perfect" (Dutch translation). Thus to lead the creature to its destiny, to cause it to develop according to its nature, to make it perfect, is the proper work of the Holy Spirit. t SeconC) Cbapter. THE CREATION. V. The Principle of Life in the Creature. " By His Spirit He hath garnished the heavens; His hand hath formed the crooked serpent."— /c7<5 xxvi. 13. We have seen that the work of the Holy Spirit consists in lead- ing all creation to its destiny, the final purpose of which is the glory of God. However, God's glory in creation appears in various degrees and ways. An insect and a star, the mildew on the wall and the cedar on Lebanon, a common laborer and a man like Augustine, are all the creatures of God; yet how dissimilar they are, and how varied their ways and degrees of glorifying God. Let us therefore illustrate the statement that the glory of God is the ultimate end of every creature. Comparing the glory of God to that of an earthly king, it is evident that nothing can be indiffer- ent to that glory. The building material of his palace, its furni- ture, even the pavement before its gate, either enhance or diminish the royal splendor. Much more, however, is the king honored by the persons of his household, each in his degree, from the master of ceremonies to his prime minister. Yet his highest glory is his family of sons and daughters, begotten of his own blood, trained by his wisdom, animated by his ideals, one with him in the plans, purposes, and spirit of his life. Applying this in all reverence to the court of the King of heaven, it is evident that while every flower and star enhance His glory, the lives of angels and men are of much greater significance to His Kingdom; and again, while among the latter they are most closely related to His glory whom He has placed in positions of authority, nearest of all are the children begotten by His Spirit, and admitted to the secret of His THE PRINCIPLE OF LIFE IN THE CREATURE 23 pavilion. We conclude, then, that God's glory is reflected most in His children ; and since no man can be His child unless he is begot- ten of Him, we confess that His glory is most apparent in His elect or in His Church. His glory is not, however, confined to these ; for they are related to the whole race, and live among all nations and peoples with whom they share the common lot. We neither may nor can sepa- rate their spiritual life from their national, social, and domestic life. And since all differences of national, social, and domestic life are caused by climate and atmosphere, meat and drink, rain and drought, plant and insect — in a word, by the whole economy of this material world, including comet and meteor, it is evident that all these affect the outcome of things and are related to the glory of God. Hence as connected with the task of leading creation to its destiny, the whole universe confronts the mind as a mighty unit organically related to the Church as the shell to the kernel. In the accomplishment of this task the question arises in what way the fairest, noblest, and holiest part of the creation is to attain its destiny ; for to this all other parts must be made subservient. Hence the question, How are the multitude of the elect to attain their final perfection? The answer to this will indicate what is the Holy Spirit's action upon all other creatures. The answer can not be doubtful. God's children can never accomplish their glorious end unless God dwell in them as in His temple. It is the love of God that constrains Him to live in His children, by their love for Him to love Himself, and to see the reflection of His glory in the consciousness of His own handiwork. This glorious purpose will be realized only when the elect know as they are known, behold their God face to face, and enjoy the felicity of closest communion with the Lord. Since all this can be wrought in them only by His indwelling in their hearts, and since it is the Third Person in the Holy Trinity who enters the spirits of men and of angels, it is evident that God's highest purposes are realized when the Holy Spirit makes man's heart His dwelling-place. Who or what ever we are by education or position, we can not attain our highest destiny unless the Holy Spirit dwell in us and operate upon the inward organism of our being. If this His highest work had no bearing upon anything else, we 24 THE CREATION might say that it consists merely in finishing the perfection of the creature. But this is not so. Every believer knows that there is a most intimate connection between his life before and after conver- sion ; not as tho the former determined the latter, but in such a way that the life in sin and the life in the beauty of holiness are both conditioned by the same character and disposition, by similar circum- stances and influences. Wherefore, to bring about our final perfec- tion the Holy Spirit must influence the previous development, the formation of character, and the disposition of the whole person. And this operation, altho less marked in the natural life, must also be traced. However, since our personal life is only a manifes- tation of human life in general, it follows that the Holy Spirit must have been active also in the creation of man, altho in a less marked degree. And finally, as the disposition of man as such is connected with the host of heaven and earth, His work must touch the formation of this also, tho to a much less extent. Hence the Spirit's work reaches as far as the influences that affect man in the attaining of his destiny or in the failure to attain it. And the measure of the influence is the degree in which they affect his perfecting. In the departure of the redeemed soul every one acknowledges a work of the Holy Spirit; but who can trace His work in the star-movements? Yet the Scripture teaches not only that we are bom again by the power of the Spirit of God, but that " by the Word of the Lord were the heavens made, and all the host of them by the breath [Spirit] of His mouth." Wherefore the Spirit's work leading the creature to its destiny includes an influence upon all creation from the beginning. And, if sin had not come in, we might say that this work is done in three successive steps: first, impregnating inanimate matter; second, animating the rational soul ; third, taking up His abode in the elect child of God. But sin entered in, i.e., a power appeared to keep man and nature frorn their destiny. Hence the Holy Spirit must antagonize sin ; His calling is to annihilate it, and despite its opposition to cause the elect children of God and the entire creation to reach their end. Redemption is therefore not a new work added to that of the Holy Spirit, but it is identical with it. He undertook to bring all things to their destiny either without the disturbance of sin or in spite of it J first, by saving the elect, and then by restoring all things in heaven and on earth at the return of the Lord Jesus Christ. THE PRINCIPLE OF LIFE IN THE CREATURE 25 Things incidental to this, such as the inspiration of Scripture, the preparation of the Body of Christ, the extraordinary ministration of grace to the Church, are only connecting-links, connecting the beginning with its own predetermined end; that in spite of sin's disturbance the destiny of the universe to glorify God might be secured. Condensing all into one statement, we might say: Sin having once entered, a factor which must be taken into account, the Holy Spirit's work shines most gloriously in gathering and saving the elect ; prior to which are His operations in the work of redemption and in the economy of the natural life. The same Spirit who in the beginning moved upon the waters has in the dispensation of grace given us the Holy Scripture, the Person of Christ, and the Christian Church ; and it is He who, in connection with the original creation and by these means of grace, now regenerates and sanctifies us as the children of God. Regarding these mighty and comprehensive operations, it is of first importance to keep in view the fact that in each He effects only that which is invisible and imperceptible. This marks all the Holy Spirit's operations. Behind the visible world lies one invisi- ble and spiritual, with outer courts and inner recesses ; and under- neath the latter are the unfathomable depths of the soul, which the Holy Spirit chooses as the scene of His labors — His temple wherein He sets up His altar. Christ's redemptive work also has visible and invisible parts. Reconciliation in His blood was visible. The sanctification of His Body and the adorning of His human nature with manifold graces were invisible. Whenever this hidden and inward work is specified the Scripture always connects it with the Holy Spirit. Gabriel says to Mary: "The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee." It is said of Christ: " That He had the Spirit without measure." We observe also in the host of heaven a life material, outward, tangible which in thought we never associate with the Holy Spirit. But, however weak and impalpable, the visible and tangible has an invisible background. How intangible are the forces of nature, how full of majesty the forces of magnetism! But life underlies all. Even through the apparently dead trunk sighs an impercept- ible breath. From the unfathomable depths of all an inward, hidden principle works upward and outward. It shows in nature, much more in man and angel. And what is this quickening and 26 THE CREATION animating principle but the Holy Spirit? " Thou sendest forth Thy Spirit, they are created; Thou takest away Thy breath, they die." This inward, invisible something is God's direct touch. There is in us and in every creature a point where the living God touches us to uphold us; for nothing exists without being upheld by Al- mighty God from moment to moment. In the elect this point is their spiritual life ; in the rational creature his rational conscious- ness; and in all creatures, whether rational or not, their life-prin- ciple. And as the Holy Spirit is the Person in the Holy Trinity whose office it is to effect this direct touch and fellowship with the creature in his inmost being, it is He who dwells in the hearts of the elect; who animates every rational being; who sustains the principle of life in very creature. VI. The Host of Heaven and of Earth. " The Spirit of God hath made me."—/od xxxiii. 4. Understanding somewhat the characteristic note of the work of the Holy Spirit, let us see what this work was and is and shall be. The Father brings forth, the Son disposes and arranges, the Holy Spirit perfects. There is one God and Father of whom are all things, and one Lord Jesus Christ through whom are all things; but what does the Scripture say of the special work the Holy Spirit did in creation and is still doing? For the sake of order we examine first the account of the crea- tion. God says in Gen. i. 2 : " The earth was without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the waters." See also Job xxvi. 13: " By His Spirit He hath garnished the heavens ; His hand hath formed the crooked serpent [the constellation of the Dragon, or, according to others, the Milky Way]." And also Job xxxiii. 4: "The Spirit of God hath made me ; and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life." And again Psalm xxxiii. 6: " By the Word of the Lord were the heavens made, and all the host of them by the breath of His mouth." So also Psalm civ. 30: "Thou sendest forth Thy Spirit, they are created, and Thou renewest the face of the earth." And with different import, in Isa. xl. 13: " Who hath directed the Spirit of the Lord [in creation], or being His counselor hath taught Him?" These statements show that the Holy Spirit did a work of His own in creation. They show, too, that His activities are closely connected with those of the Father and the Son. Psalm xxxiii. 6 presents them as almost identical. The first clause reads: " By the Word of the Lord were the heavens made"; the second: "And all the host of them by the breath [Spirit] of His mouth." It is well known that in Hebrew poetry parallel clauses express the same thought in 28 THE CREATION different ways ; so that from this passage it appears that the work of the Word and that of the Spirii are the same, the latter adding only that which is peculiarly His own. It should be noticed that hardly any of these passages mention the Holy Spirit by His aivn name. It is not the Holy Spirit, but the " Spirit of His mouth," " His Spirit," " the Spirit of the Lord." On account of this, many hold that these passages do not refer to the Holy Spirit as the Third Person in the Holy Trinity, but speak of God as One, without personal distinction ; and that the representa- tion of God as creating anything by His hand, fingers, word, breath, or Spirit is merely a human way of speaking, signifying only that God was thus engaged. The Church has always opposed this interpretation, and rightly so, on the ground that even the Old Testament, not merely in a few places but throughout its entire economy, bears undoubted testi- mony to the three divine Persons, coequal yet of one essence. It is true that this too has been denied, but by a wrong interpretation. And to the reply, " But our interpretation is as good as yours," we answer that Jesus and the apostles are our authorities; the Church received its confession frorn their lips. Secondly, we deny that " His Spirit" does not refer to the Holy Ghost, for the reason that in the New Testament similar expres- sions occur that undoubtedly do refer to Him, e.g., God hath sent forth the Spirit of His Son" (Gal. iv. 6); "Whom the Lord shall consume by the Spirit of His mouth " (2 Thess. ii. 8) ; etc. Thirdly, judging from the following passages, — " By the Word oi the Lord were the heavens made " (Psalm xxxiii. 6) ; " And God said. Let there be light" (Gen. i. 3) ; and " All things were made by Him, and without Him was not anything made that was made " (John i. 3), — there can be no doubt that Psalm xxxiii. 6 refers to the Second Person in the Godhead. Hence also the second clause of the same verse, " And all their host by the Spirit of His mouth," must refer to the Third Person. Finally, to speak of a Spirit of God that is not the Holy Spirit is to transfer to the Holy Scripture a purely Western and human idea. We as men often speak of a wrong spirit which controls a nation, an army, or a school, meaning a certain tendency, inclination, or per- suasion— a spirit that proceeds from a man distinct from his person and being. But this may not and can not apply to God. Speak- ing of Christ in His humiliation, one may rightly say, " To have THE HOST OF HEAVEN AND OF EARTH 29 the mind of Christ," or " to have the spirit of Jesus," which indi- cates His disposition. But to distinguish the divine Being from a spirit of that Being is to conceive of the Godhead in a human way. The divine consciousness differs wholly from the human. While in us there is a difference between our persons and our con- sciousness, with reference to God such distinctions disappear, and the distinction of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit takes their place. Even in those passages where "the breath of His mouth" is added to explain " His Spirit," the same interpretation must be maintained. For all languages show that our breathing, even as the " breathing of the elements" in the wind which blows before God's face, corresponds to the being of spirit. Nearly all express the ideas of spirit, breath, and wind by cognate terms. Blowing or breathing is in all the Scripture the symbol of spirit-communica- tion. Jesus breathed on them and said : " Receive ye the Holy Ghost" (John xx. 22). Thus the breath of His mouth must signify the Holy Spirit. The ancient interpretation of the Scripture should not be hastily abandoned. Accept the dictum of modern theology that the dis- tinction of the three divine Persons is not found in the Old Testa- ment, and allusions to the work of the Holy Spirit in Genesis, Job, Psalms, or Isaiah are out of the question. Consequently nothing is more natural for the supporters of this modern theology than to deny the Holy Spirit altogether in the passages referred to. But if from inward conviction we still confess that the distinc- tion of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is clearly seen in the Old Testament, then let us examine these passages concerning the Spirit of the Lord with discrimination, and gratefully maintain the traditional interpretation, which finds at least in many of these statements references to the work of the Holy Spirit. These passages show that His peculiar work in creation was: ist, hovering over chaos; 2d, creation of the host of heaven and of earth; 3d, ordening the heavens; 4th, animating the brute creation, and calling man into existence; and last, the operation whereby every creature is made to exist according to God's counsel concern- ing it. Hence the material forces of the universe do not proceed from the Holy Spirit, nor did He deposit in matter the dormant seeds an4 germs of life. His special task begins only after the creation of matter with the germs of life in it. 30 THE CREATION The Hebrew text shows that the work of the Holy Spirit moving upon the face of the waters was similar to that of the parent bird which with outspread wings hovers over its young to cherish and cover them. The figure implies that not only the earth existed, but also the germs of life within it; and that the Holy Spirit im- pregnating these germs caused the life to come forth in order to lead it to its destiny. Not by the • Holy Spirit, but by the Word were the heavens created. And when the created heavens were to receive their host, then only did the moment come for the exercise of the Holy Spirit's peculiar functions. What " the host of heaven" means is not easily decided. It may refer to sun, moon, and stars, or to the host of angels. Perhaps the passage means not the creation of the heavenly bodies, but their reception of heavenly glory and celestial fire. But Psalm xxxiii. 6 refers certainly not to the creation of the matter of which the heavenly host are composed, but to the produc- tion of their glory. Gen. i. 2 reveals first the creation of matter and its germs, then their quickening ; so Psalm xxxiii. 6 teaches first the prepara- tion of the being and nature of the heavens, then the bringing forth of their host by the Holy Spirit. Job xxvi. 13 leads to a similar conclusion. Here is the same distinction between the heavens and their ordening, the latter being represented as the special work of the Holy Spirit. This ordening is the same as the brooding in Gen. i. 2, by which the formless took form, the hidden life emerged, and the things created were led to their destiny. Psalm civ. 30 and Job xxxiii. 4 illustrate the work of the Holy Spirit in creation still more clearly. Job informs us that the Holy Spirit had a special part in the making of man; and Psalm civ. that He performed a similar work in the creation of the animals, of the fowls and the fishes; for the two preceding verses imply that verse 27 — "Thou sendest forth Thy Spirit, they are created" — refers not to man, but to the monsters that play in the deep. Grant that the matter out of which God made man was already present in the dust of the earth, that the type of his body was largely present in the animal, and that the idea of man and the image after which he was to be created existed already ; yet from Job xxxiii. 4 it is evident that he did not come to be without a special work of the Holy Spirit. So Psalm civ. 30 proves that, altho the matter existed out of which whale and unicorn were to be THE HOST OF HEAVEN AND OF EARTH 31 made, and the plan or model was in the divine counsel, yet a special act of the Holy Spirit was needed to cause them to be. This is still plainer in view of the fact that neither passage refers to the_/^/^/ creation, but to a man and animals formed later. For Job speaks not of Adam and Eve, but of himself. He says: "The spirit of God hath made vie, and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life." In Psalm civ. David means not the monsters of the deep created in the beginning, but those that were walking the paths of the sea while he was singing this psalm. If, therefore, the bodies of existing man and of mammals are not immediate creations, but are taken from the flesh and blood, the nature and kind of existent beings, then it is more evident that the hovering of the Holy Spirit over the unformed is a present act ; and that therefore His creative work was to bring out the life already hidden in chaos, i.e., in the germs of life. This agrees with what was said at first of the general character of His work. " To lead to its destiny " is to bring forth the hidden life, to cause the hidden beauty to reveal itself, to rouse into activity the slumbering energies. Only let us not represent it as a work performed in successive stages — first by the Father, whose finished work was taken up by the Son, after which the Holy Spirit completed the work thus pre- pared. Such representations are unworthy of God. There is distri- bution, no division, in the divine activities ; wherefore Isaiah declares that the Spirit of the Lord, i.e., the Holy Spirit, throughout the entire work of creation, from the beginning — yea, from before the beginning — directed all that was to come. VII. The Creaturely Man. " The Spirit of God hath made me, and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life."— yi?3 xxxiii. 4. The Eternal and Ever-blessed God comes into vital touch with the creature by an act proceeding not from the Father nor from the Son, but from the Holy Spirit. Translated by sovereign grace from death unto life, God's chil- dren are conscious of this divine fellowship; they know that it con- sists not in inward agreement of disposition or inclination, but in the mysterious touch of God upon their spiritual being. But they also know that neither the Father nor the Son, but the Holy Spirit, has made their hearts His temple. It is true Christ comes to us through the Holy Spirit, and through the Son we have fellowship with the Father, according to His word, " I and the Father will come unto you, and make Our abode with you"; yet every intelli- gent Bible student knows that it is more especially the Holy Spirit who enters into his person and touches his innermost being. That the Son incarnate came into closer contact with us proves nothing to the contrary. Christ never entered into a huma.n person. He took upon Himself our human nature, with which He united Himself much more closely than the Holy Spirit does; but He did not touch the inward man and his hidden personality. On the con- trary, He said that it was expedient for the disciples that He should go away; " for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart I will send Him unto you." Moreover, the In- carnation was not accomplished without the Holy Spirit, who over- shadowed Mary; and the blessings that Christ imparted to all around Him were largely owing to the gift of the Holy Spirit, which was given Him without measure. Hence the principal thought remains intact : When God comes into direct contact with the creature it is the work of the Holy THE CREATURELY MAN 33 Spirit to effect such contact. In the visible world this action con- sists in the kindling and fanning of the spark of life ; hence it is quite natural and in full harmony with the general tenor of the teaching of Scripture that the Spirit of God moves upon the face of the waters, that He brings forth the host of heaven and earth, ordened, animated, and resplendent. Besides this visible creation there is also an invisible, which, so far as our world is concerned, concentrates itself in the heart of man ; hence, in the second place, we must see how far the work of the Holy Spirit may be traced in man's creation. Of the animal world we do not speak. Not as tho the Holy Spirit had nothing to do with their creation. From Psalm civ. 30 we have proven the contrary. Moreover, no one can deny the admirable traits of cunning, love, fidelity, and thankfulness in many of the animals. Not that we would be foolish on that ground to call the dog half human; for these higher animal properties are evidently but instinctive preformations, sketches of the Holy Spirit, carried to their proper destiny in man alone. And yet, however striking these traits may be, it is not a. person that meets us in the animal. The animal proceeds from the world of matter, and returns to it ; in man alone appears that which is new, invisible, and spiritual, justifying us in looking for a special work of the Holy Spirit in his creation. Of himself, i.e., of a tnan. Job declares: " The Spirit of God hath made me, and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life." The Spirit of God hath made 7ne. That which I am as a hiwian person- ality is the work of the Holy Spirit. To Him I owe the human and personal that constitute me the being that I am. He adds: "The breath of the Almighty hath given me life"; which evidently echoes the words: "The Lord God breathed into His nostrils the breath of life." Like Job, we ought to feel and to acknowledge that in Adam you and I aie created; when God created Adam He created us ; in Adam's nature He called forth the nature wherein we now live. Gen. i. and ii. is not the record of aliens, but of ourselves — concern- ing the flesh and blood which we carry with us, the human nature in which we sit down to read the Word of God. He that reads his Bible without this personal application reads amiss. It leaves him cold and indifferent. It may charm him in the days of his childhood, when one is fond of tales and stories, but 3 34 THE CREATION has no hold of him in the days of conflict, when he meets the stem facts and realities of life. But if we accustom ourselves to see in this record the history of our own flesh and blood, of our own human nature and life, and acknowledge that by human generation we spring from Adam, and therefore were in Adam when he was created — then we shall also know that when God formed Adam out of the dust He also formed us; that we also were in Paradise; that Adam's fall was also ours. In a word, the first page of Genesis relates the history not of an alien, but of our own real selves. The breath of the Almighty gave us life, when the Lord formed man of the dust, and breathed into his nostrils and made him a living soul. The root of our life lies in our parents; but through and beyond them the tender fiber of that root goes back through the long line of generations, and received its earliest beginning when Adam first breathed God's pure air in Paradise. And yet, tho in Paradise we received the first inception of our being, there is also a second beginning of our life, viz., when from the race, by conception and birth, each of us was called into being individually. And of this also Job testifies: " The Spirit of the Lord hath given me life." And again, in the life of sinful man there comes a third begin- ning, when it pleases God to convert the wicked ; and of this also the soul testifies within us ; " The Spirit of the Lord hath given me life." Leaving this new birth out of the question, the testimony of Job shows us that he was conscious of the fact that he owed his exist- ence as a man, as a person, as an ego, hence his creation in Adam as well as his personal being, to God. And what does the Scripture teach us concerning the creation of man? This : that the dust of the ground out of which Adam was formed was so wrought upon that it became a living soul, which indicates the human being. The result was not merely a moving, creeping, eating, drinking, and sleeping creature, but a living soul that came into existence at the moment when the breath of life was breathed into the dust. It was not first the dust, and then human life within the dust, and after that the soul with all its higher facul- ties in that human life ; nay, as soon as life went forth into Adam, he was a man, and all his precious gifts were natural endowments. Sinful man being born from above receives gifts that are above nature. For this reason the Holy Spirit merely dwells in the quick- THE CREATURELY MAN 35 ened sinner. But in heaven this will not be so ; for in death the human nature is so completely changed that the impulse to sin disappears entirely ; wherefore in heaven the Holy Spirit will work in the human nature itself for ever and ever. In the present state of humiliation the nature of the regenerate is still the Adam-nature. The gfreat mystery of the work of the Holy Spirit in him is this: that /// and by that broken and corrupt nature He works the holy works of God. It is as light shining through our window-panes, but in no wise identical with the glass. In Paradise, however, man's nature was whole, intact; every- thing about him was holy. We must avoid the dangerous error that the newly created man had an inferior degree of holiness. God made man upright, with nothing crooked in or about him. All his inclinations and powers with all their workings were pure and holy. God delighted in Adam, saw that he was good ; surely noth- ing more can be desired. In this respect Adam differed from the child of God by grace in not having eternal life ; he was to attain this as the reward for holy works. On the other hand, Abraham, the father of the faithful, begins with eternal life, from which holy works were to proceed. Hence a perfect contrast. Adam must attain eternal life by works. Abraham has eternal life through which he obtains holy works. Hence for Adam there can be no indwelling of the Holy Spirit. There was no antagonism between him and the Spirit. So the Spirit coVi\^ pervade him, not merely dwell vsx him. The nature of sinful man repels the Holy Spirit, but Adam's nature attracted Him, freely received Him, and let Him inspire his being. Our faculties and inclinations are impaired, our powers are ener- vated, the passions of our hearts corrupt; hence the Holy Spirit must come to us from without. But since Adam's faculties were all intact, and the whole expression of his inward life undisturbed, therefore could the Holy Spirit work through the common powers and operations of his nature. To Adam spiritual things were not a superna.tuT3i\, but a natural good — except eternal life, which he must earn by fulfilling the law. Scripture expresses this unity between Adam's natural life and spiritual powers by identifying the two expressions — "To breathe into the breath of life," and "to become a living soul." Other passages show that this divine "inbreathing" indicates especially the Spirit's work. Jesus breathed upon His disciples 36 THE CREATION and said: "Receive ye the Holy Ghost." He compares the Holy Spirit to the wind. In both the Biblical languages, Hebrew and Greek, the word spirit means wind, breathing or blowing. And as the Church confesses that the Son is eternally generated by the Father, so it confesses that the Holy Spirit proceedeth from the Father and the Son as by breathing. Hence we conclude that the passage, "And breathed into his nostrils the breath of life" — in connection with, " The Spirit of God moved on the face of the waters," and the word of Job, " The Spirit of God hath given me life " — points to a special work of the Holy Spirit. Before God breathed the breath of life in the lifeless dust, there was a conference in the economy of the divine Being : " Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness." This shows — First, that each divine Person had a distinct work in the creation of man — " Let Us make man." Before this the singular is used of God — " He spake," " He saw"; but now the plural is used, " Let Us make man," which implies that, here specially and more clearly than in any preceding passage, the activities of the Persons are to be distinguished. Secondly, that man was not created empty, afterward to be en- dowed with higher spiritual faculties and powers, but that the very act of creation made him after God's image, without any subse- quent addition to his being. For we read : " Let Us create man in Our image and after Our likeness" This assures us that by immediate creation man received the impress of the divine image ; that in the creation the divine Persons each performed a distinct work ; and, lastly, that man's creation with reference to his higher destiny was effected by a going forth of the breath of God. This is the basis of our statement that the Spirit's creative work was making all man's powers and gifts instruments for His own use, connecting them vitally and immediately with the powers of God. This agrees with Biblical teachings regarding the Holy Spirit's regenerating work, which also, the differently, brings the power and holiness of God in immediate contact with human powers. We deny, therefore, the frequent assertion of ethical theolo- gians, that the Holy Spirit created th.Q personality of man, since this opposes the entire economy of Scripture. For what is our person- ality but the realization of God's plan concerning us? Such as God from eternity has thought each of us, as distinct from other men, THE CREATURELY MAN 37 with our own stamp, life-history, calling, and destiny — as such each must develop and show himself to become a person. Thus alone each obtains character; anything else so called is pride and arbi- trariness. If our personality result directly from God's plan, then it and what we have in common with all other creatures can not be from the Holy Spirit, but from the Father ; like all other things, it re- ceives its disposition from the Son ; and the Holy Spirit acts upon it as upon every other creature, by kindling the spark, imparting the glow of life. VIII. Gifts and Talents. " And the Spirit of the Lord came uponhim."— ywa^fjiii. lo. We now consider the Holy Spirit's work in bestowing gifts, talents, and abilities upon artisans and professional men. Scrij> ture declares that the special animation and qualification of persons for work assigned to them by God proceed from the Holy Spirit. The construction of the tabernacle required capable workmen, skilful carpenters, goldsmiths, and silversmiths, and masters in the arts of weaving and embroidering. Who will furnish Moses with them? The Holy Spirit. For we read in Exod. xxxi. 2, 3: " I have called by name Bezaleel, the son of Uri, . . . and I have filled him with the Spirit of God, in wisdom, and in understanding, and in knowledge, and in all manner of workmanship, to devise cunning works, to work in gold, and in silver, and in brass, and in cutting of stones, to set them, and in carving of timber, to work in all manner of workmanship." Verse 6 shows that this activity of the Holy Spirit included others : " In the hearts of all that are wise- hearted I have put wisdom, that they may make all that I have commanded them." And to give clearest light on this subject. Scripture says also: " Then hath He filled with wisdom of heart, to work all manner of work of the engraver and of the cunning work- man, and of the embroiderer in blue and in purple and in scarlet and in fine linen of the weaver, even of them that do any work and of these that devise cunning work." The Spirit's working shows not only in ordinary skilled labor, but also in the higher spheres of human knowledge and mental activity; for military genius, legal acumen, statemanship, and power to inspire the masses with enthusiasm are equally ascribed to it. This is generally expressed in the words, " And the Spirit of the Lord came upon" such a hero, judge, statesman, or tribune of the people, especially in the days of the Judges, when it is said GIFTS AND TALENTS 39 of Joshua, Othniel, Barak, Gideon, Samson, Samuel, and others that the Spirit of the Lord came upon them. Also of Zerubbabel rebuilding the temple, it is said: " Not by might nor by power, but by My Spirit, saith the Lord." Even of the heathen king, Cyrus, we read that Jehovah had called him to His work and anointed him with the Spirit of the Lord — Isa. xlv. This last instance introduces another aspect of the case, viz., the operation of the Holy Spirit in qualifying men for official functions. For altho this operation upon and through the office receives its fullest significance only in the dispensation of grace, yet the case of Cyrus shows that the Holy Spirit has originally a work to per- form in this respect which is not only a result of grace, but belongs essentially to the nature of the work, even tho it is obvious only in the history of God's special dealings with His own people. It is especially noticeable in the struggle between Saul and David. There is no reason to consider Saul one of God's elect. After his anointing the Holy Spirit comes upon him, abides with him, and works upon him as long as he remains the Lord's chosen king over His people. But as soon as by wilful disobedience he forfeits that favor, the Holy Spirit departs from him and an evil spirit from the Lord troubles him. Evidently this work of the Holy Spirit has nothing to do with regeneration. For a time it may operate upon a man and then forever depart from him ; while the Spirit's saving operation, even tho suspended for a time, can never be wholly lost. David's touching prayer, " Take not Thy Holy Spirit from me," must therefore refer to gifts qualifying him for the kingly office. David had the terrible example of Saul before him. He had seen what becomes of a man whom the Holy Spirit leaves to himself; and his heart trembled at the possibility of an evil spirit coming upon him, and an end as sad as Saul's. Like Judas, Saul dies a suicide. From the whole Scripture teaching we therefore conclude that the Holy Spirit has a work in connection with mechanical arts and official functions — in every special talent whereby some men excel in such art or office. This teaching is not simply that such gifts and talents are not of man but from God like all other blessings, but that they are not the work of the Father, nor of the Son, but of the Holy Spirit. The distinction discovered in creation may be observed here : gifts and talents come from the Father ; are disposed for each per- 40 THE CREATION sonality by the Son ; and kindled in each by the Holy Spirit as by a spark from above. Let us distinguish art itself, persojml talent to practise it, and the vocation thereto. Art is not man's invention, but God's creation. In all nations and ages men have pursued the arts of weaving, embroidering, skilful dressmaking, casting and chasing noble metals, cutting and polishing diamonds, molding iron and brass; and in all these coun- tries and ages, without knowing of each other's eflfbrts, have applied the same arts to all these materials. Of course there is a difference. Oriental work bears a stamp quite different from that of the West. Even French and German work differ. But under the differences, the endeavor, the art applied, the material, the ideal pursued are the same. So, too, art did not attain perfection all at once ; among the nations forms at first crude and awkward gradually developed into forms chaste, refined, and beautiful. Successive generations improved upon previous achievements, until among the various nations comparative perfection of art and skill was attained. Hence art is not the result of man's thought and purpose; but God has placed in various materials certain possibilities of workman- ship, and by applying this workmanship man must make out of each what there is in it, and not whatever he chooses. Two things must cooperate to effect this. In the creation of gold, silver, wood, iron, God must have placed in them certain possibilities, and have created inventive power in man's mind, per- severance in his will, strength in his muscle, accurate vision in his eye, delicacy of touch and action in his fingers, thus qualifying him to evolve what is latent in the materials. Since this labor has the same nature among all nations, the perpetual progress of the same great work being accomplished according to the same majestic plan, through successive generations, all artistic skill and executive ability must be wrought in man by a higher power and according to a higher command. Viewing the treasures of an industrial exposi- tion in the light of the revealed Word, we shall see in their gradual development and genetic unity the downfall of human pride, and exclaim : " What is all this art and skill but the manifestation of the possibilities which God has placed in these materials, and of the powers of mind and eye and finger which He has given the children of men!" Consider, now, personal talent as utterly distinct from art. GIFTS AND TALENTS 41 The goldsmith in his craft and the judge in his office enter upon a work of God. Each labors in his divine vocation, and all the skill and judgment that he may develop therein come from the treasures of the Lord. Still, workman differs from workman, general from general. The one copies the product of the generation before him and be- queaths it without increasing the artistic skill. He began as an apprentice, and imparts this skill to other apprentices; but the artistic proficiency is the same. The other manifests something akin to genius. He quickly surpasses his master; sees, touches, discovers something new. In his hand art is enriched. It is given him to transfer from the treasures of divine artistic skill new beau- ties into human skill. So also of men in office and profession. Thousands of officers trained in our military schools become good teachers of the science of tactics as practised heretofore, but add nothing to it ; while among these thousands there may be two or three possessed of military genius who in the event of war will astonish the world by their brilliant exploits. This talent, this individual genius so intimately connected with man's personality, is b. gift. No power in the world can create it in the man that possesses it not. The child is born with or without it; if without it, no education nor severity — not even ambition — can call it forth. But as the gift of grace is freely bestowed by the sover- eign God, so is also the gift of genius. When the people pray, let them not forget to ask the Lord to raise up among them men of talent, heroes of art and of office. When in 1870 Germany had victory only, and France defeat only, it was God's sovereignty that gave the former talented generals, and in displeasure denied them to the latter. Consider the vocation. Official and mechanical men have a high call. All have not the same ability. One is adapted for the sea, another for the plow. One is a bungler in the foundry, but a master at wood-carving, while another is the reverse. This depends upon the personality, nature, and inclination. And since the Holy Spirit lights the personality, He also determines every man's calling to trade or profession. The same applies to the life of nations. The French excel in taste as well as in artistic workmanship ; while the English seem created for the sea, our masters in all the markets of the 42 THE CREATION world. The Holy Spirit even bestows artistic skill and talent upon a nation at one time and withdraws it at another. Three centuries ago Holland surpassed all Europe in weaving, making porcelain, printing, painting, and engraving. But how great the subsequent decline in this respect — altho now progress again appears. What we find in Israel is related to this. This very thirst and capacity for knowledge had caused man to fall. The first impetus was given to artistic skill among Cain's descendants; the Jubals and the Jabals and the Tubal-Cains were the first artists. And yet this whole development, altho feeding upon the treasures of God, departed more and more from Him, while His own people utterly lacked it. In the days of Samuel there was no smith found in all the land of Canaan. Hence the Spirit's coming upon Bezaleel and Aholiab, upon Othniel and Samson, upon Saul and David, signifies something more than a mere imparting of artistic skill and talent ; namely, the restoration of what sin had corrupted and defiled. And thus the illumination of a Bezaleel links the Holy Spirit's work in the material creation and that in the dispensation of grace. Ubtrt) Cbapter. RE-CREATION. IX. Creation and Re-Creation. •' Behold, I will pour out My Spirit unto you." — Prov. i. 23. We approach the special work of the Holy Spirit in Re-creation. We have seen that the Holy Spirit had a part in the creation of all things, particularly in creating itian, and most particularly in endowing him with gifts and talents ; also that His creative work affects the upholding of " things," of " man," and of " talents," through the providence of God ; and that in this double series of threefold activity the Spirit's work is intimately connected with that of the Father and that of the Son, so that every thing, every man, every talent springs from the Father, is given disposition in their respective natures and being through the Son, and receives the spark of life by the Holy Spirit. The old church hymn, " Veni, Creator Spiritus," and the ancient confession of the Holy Spirit as the " Vivificans" agree with this perfectly. For the latter signifies that Person in the Trinity who imparts the spark of life ; and the former means, " Seeing that the things which are to live and shall live are ready, come Holy Spirit and quicken them." There is always the same deep thought: the Father remains outside of the creature; the Son touches him outwardly; by the Holy Spirit the divine life touches him directly in his inward being. However, let us not be understood to say that God comes into contact with the creature only in the regeneration of His children. 44 RE-CREATION \vhich would be untrue. To the Gentiles at Athens, St. Paul says: "In Him we live and move and have our being." And again: " For of His offspring we are." To say nothing of plant or ani- mal, there is on earth no life, energy, law, atom, or element but the Almighty and Omnipresent God quickens and supports that life from moment to moment, causes that energy to work, and enforces that law. Suppose that for an instant God should cease to sustain and animate this life, these forces, and that law ; in that same instant they would cease to be. The energy that proceeds from God must therefore touch the creature in the very center of its being, whence, its whole existence must spring. Hence there is no sun, moon, nor star, no material, plant, or animal, and, in much higher sense, no man, skill, gift, or talent unless God touch and support them all. It is this act of coming into immediate contact with every crea- ture, animate or inanimate, organic or inorganic, rational or irra- tional, that, according to the profound conception of the Word of God, is performed not by the Father, nor by the Son, but by the Holy Spirit. And this puts the work of the Holy Spirit in a light quite differ- ent from that in which for many years the Church has looked upon it. The general impression is that His work refers to the life of grace only, and is confined to regeneration and sanctification. This is due more or less to the well-known division of the Apostolic Creed by the Heidelberg Catechism, question 29, " How are these articles divided?" which is answered : " Into three parts — of God the Father and our creation, of God the Son and our redemption, and of God the Holy Spirit and our sanctification." And this, too, altho Ursinus, one of the authors of this catechism, had already declared, in his " Thesaurus," that : " All the three Persons create and redeem and sanctify. But in these operations they observe this order — that the Father creates of Himself by means of the Son; the Son creates by means of the Father; and the Holy Spirit by means of both." But since the deeper insight into the mystery of the adorable Trinity was gradually lost, and the pulpit's touch upon it became both rare and superficial, the Sabellian error naturally crept into the Church again, viz., that there were three successive periods in the activities of the divine Persons: First, that of the Father alone creating the world and upholding the natural life of all things. This was followed by a period of activity for the Son, when nature had CREATION AND RE-CREATION 45 become unnatural and fallen man a subject for redemption. Lastly, came that of the Holy Spirit regenerating and sanctifying the redeemed on the ground of the work of Christ. According to this view, in childhood, when eating, drinking, and playing occupied all our time, we had to do with the Father. Later, when the conviction of sin dawned upon us, we felt the need of the Son. And not until the life of sanctification had begun in us did the Holy Spirit begin to take notice of us. Hence while the Father wrought, the Son and the Holy Spirit were inactive ; when the Son undertook His work, the Father and the Holy Spirit were inactive ; and now since the Holy Spirit alone performs the work, the Father and the Son are idle. But since this view of God is wholly unten- able, Sabellius, who elaborated it philosophically, came to the con- clusion that Father, Son, and Holy Ghost were after all but one Person; who first wrought in creation as Father, then having become the Son wrought out our redemption, and now as the Holy Spirit perfects our sanctification. And yet, inadmissible as this view may be. it is more reverent and God-fearing than the crude superficialities of the current views that confine the Spirit's operations entirely to the elect, beginning only at their regeneration. True, sermons on creation referred, in passing, to the moving of the Holy Spirit on the face of the waters, and His coming upon Bezaleel and Aholiab is treated in the catechetical class ; but the two are not connected, and the hearer is never made to understand what the Author of our regeneration had to do with the moving upon the waters; they were merely isolated facts. Regeneration was the principal work of the Holy Spirit. Our Reformed theologians have always warned against such representations, which are only the result of making man the start- ing-point in the contemplation of divine things. They always made God Himself the starting-point, and were not satisfied until the work of the Holy Spirit was clearly seen in all its stages, throughout the ages, and in the heart of every creature. Without this the Holy Spirit could not be God, the object of their adoration. They felt that such superficial treatment would lead to a denial of His personality, reducing Him to a mere force. Hence we have spared no pain, and omitted no detail, in order, by the grace of God, to place before the Church two distinct thoughts, viz. : 46 RE-CREATION First, The work of the Holy Spirit is not confined to the elect, and does not begin with their regeneration ; but it touches every creature, animate and inanimate, and begins its operations in the elect at the very moment of their origin. Second, The proper work of the Holy Spirit in every creature consists in the quickening and sustaining of life with reference to his being and talents, and, in its highest sense, with reference to eternal life, which is his salvation. Thus we have regained the true standpoint requisite for consid- ering the work of the Holy Spirit in the re-creation. For thus it appears : First, that this work of re-creation is not performed in fallen man independently of his original creation ; but that the Holy Spirit, who in regeneration kindles the spark of eternal life, has already kindled and sustained the spark of natural life. And, again, that the Holy Spirit, who imparts unto man born from above gifts necessary to sanctification and to his calling in the new sphere of life, has in the first creation endowed him with natural gifts and talents. From this follows that fruitful confession of the unity of man's life before and after the new birth which nips every form of Methodism* in its very root, and which characterizes the doctrine of the Reformed churches. Second, it is evident that the work of the Holy Spirit bears the same character in creation and re-creation. If we admit that He quickens life in that which is created by the Father and by the Son, what does He do in the re-creation but once more quicken life in him that is called of the Father and redeemed by the Son? Again, if the Spirit's work is God's touching the creature's being by Him, what is re-creation but the Spirit entering man's heart, making it His temple, comforting, animating, and sanctifying it.> Thus following the Sacred Scripture and the superior theolo- gians, we reach a confession that maintains the unity of the Spirit's work, and makes it unite organically the natural and the spiritual life, the realm of nature and that of grace. Of course His work in the latter surpasses that in the former: First, since it is His work to touch the inward being of the crea- * For the sense in which the author takes Methodism, see section 5 in the Preface. CREATION AND RE-CREATION 47 ture, the more tender and natural the contact the more glorious the work. Hence it appears more beautiful in man than in the animal ; and more lustrous in the spiritual man than in the natural, since the contact with the former is more intimate, the fellowship sweeter, the union complete. Secondly, since creation lies so far behind us and re-creation touches us personally and daily, the Word of God directs more attention to the latter, claiming for it more prominence in our con- fession. But, however different the measures of operation and of energy, the Holy Spirit remains in creation and re-creation the one omnipotent Worker of all life and quickening, and is therefore worthy of all praise and adoration. X. Organic and Individual. " Where is He that put His Holy Spirit among them ? " — Isa. Ixiii. ii. The subsequent activity of the Holy Spirit lies in the realm of grace. In nature the Spirit of God appears as creating, in grace as re-creating. We call it ri?-creation, because God's grace creates not something inherently new, but a new life in an old and degraded nature. But this must not be understood as tho grace restored only what sin had destroyed. For then the child of God, born anew and sancti- fied, must be as Adam was in Paradise before the fall. Many under- stand it so, and present it as follows : In Paradise Adam became diseased; the poison of eternal corruption entered his soul and penetrated his whole being. Now comes the Holy Spirit as the physician, carrying the remedy of grace to heal him. He pours the balm into his wounds. He heals his bruises and renews his youth; and thus man, born again, healed, and renewed, is, according to their view, precisely what the first man was in the state of recti- tude. Once more the provisions of the covenant of works are laid upon him. By his good works he is again to inherit eternal life. Again he may fall like Adam and become a prey of eternal death. But this whole view is wrong. Grace does not place the ungodly in a state of rectitude, but justifies him — two very different things. He that stands in a state of rectitude has certainly an original righteousness, but this he may lose; he may be tried and fail as Adam failed. He must vindicate his righteousness. Its inward consistency must discover itself. He who is righteous to-day may be unrighteous to-morrow. But when God justifies a sinner He puts Him in a totally differ- ent state. The righteousness of Christ becomes his. And what is this righteousness? Was Jesus in a state of rectitude only? In no ORGANIC AND INDIVIDUAL 49 wise. His righteousness was tested, tried, and sifted: it was even tested by the consuming fire of God's wrath. And this righteous- ness converted from " original rectitude " into " righteousness vindicated" was imputed to the ungodly. Therefore the ungodly, when justified by grace, has nothing to do with Adam's ^toX^ before the fall, but occupies the position of Jesus after the resurrection. He possesses a good that can not be lost. He works no more for wages, but the inheritance is his own. His works, zeal, love, and praise flow not from his own poverty, but from the overflowing fulness of the life that was obtained for him. As it is often expressed: For Adam in Paradise there was first work and then the Sabbath of rest ; but for the ungodly justi- fied by grace the Sabbath rest comes first, and then the labor which flows from the energies of that Sabbath. In the beginning the week closed with the Sabbath ; for us the day of the resurrection of Christ opens the week which feeds upon the powers of that resur- rection. Hence the great and glorious work of re-creation has two parts : First, the removing of corruption, the healing of the breach, the death to sin, the atonement for guilt. Second, the reversing of the first order, the changing of the entire state, the bringing in and establishing of a new order. The last is of greatest importance. For many teach differently. Altho they grant that a new-born child of God is not precisely what Adam was before the fall, yet they see the difference only in the reception of a higher nature. The state is the same, differing only in degree. This is the current theory. This nature of higher degree is called the " divine-human" which Christ bears in His Per- son, which being consolidated by His Passion and Resurrection is now imparted to the new-born soul, raising the lower and degraded nature to this higher life. This theory directly conflicts with the Scripture, which never speaks of conditions similar yet differing in degree and power, but of a condition sometimes far inferior in power and degree to that of Adam, but transferred into an entirely different order. For this reason the Scripture and the Confession of our fathers emphasize the doctrine of the Covenants; for the difference be- tween the Covenant of Works and of Grace shows the difference between the two orders of spiritual things. They who teach that the new birth merely imparts a higher nature remain under the 4 50 RE-CREATION Covenant of Works. Theirs is the wearisome toil of rolling the Sisyphus stone up the mountain, even tho it be with the greater energy of the higher life. The Scriptural doctrine of Grace ends this impossible Sisyphus task ; it transfers the Covenant of Works from our shoulders to Christ's, and opens unto us a new order in the Covenant of Grace in which there can be no more uncertainty or fear, loss or forfeit of the benefits of Christ, but of which Wisdom doth cry, "and Understanding putteth forth her voice, standing in the top of high places," saying that all things are now ready. The work of re-creation has this peculiarity, that it places the elect at once at the end of the road. They are not like the traveler still half way from home, but like one who has finished his journey; the long, dreary, ^nd dangerous road is entirely behind him. Of course, he did not run that road ; he could never have reached the goal. His Mediator and Daysman traveled it for him and in his stead. And by mystic union with his Savior it is as tho he had traveled the whole distance ; not as we reckon, but as God reckons. This will show why the work of the Holy Spirit appears more powerful in re-creation than in creation. For what is the road spoken of, but that which leads from the center of our degenerate hearts to the center of the loving heart of God? All godliness aims to bring man into communion with God; hence to make him travel the road between him and God. Man is the only being on earth in whom contact with God means conscious fellowship. Since this fellowship is broken by the alienation of sin, at the end of the road the contact and fellowship must be perfect, so far as concerns man's state and principle. If fellowship is the terminus and- God's grace puts His child there at once, at least so far as his state is con- cerned, there is an obvious difference between him and the unre- generate ; for the latter is infinitely distant from God, while the former has sweetest fellowship with Him. Since it is the inward operation of the Holy Spirit that accomplishes this. His hand must appear more powerful and glorious in re-creation than in creation. If we could see His work in re-creation all at once as an accom- plished fact, we should understand it more thoroughly, and escape the difficulties that we now meet in comparing the Old Testament with the New regarding it. Re-creation brings to us that which is eternal, finished, perfected. ORGANIC AND INDIVIDUAL 51 completed; far above the succession of moments, the course of years, and the development of circumstances. Here lies the diffi- culty. This eternal work must be brought to a temporal world, to a race which is in process of development; hence that work must make history, increasing like a plant, growing, blossoming, and bearing fruit. And this history must include a time oi preparation, revelation, and lastly of filling the earth with the streams of grace, salvation, and blessing. If it did not relate to man but to irrational beings, there would be no difficulty ; but when it began its course man was already in the world, and as the ages passed the stream of humanity broad- ened. Hence the important question: Whether the generations that lived during the long period of preparation before Christ, in whom the work of re-creation was finally revealed, were partakers of its blessings? The Scripture answers affirmatively. In the ages before Christ God's elect shared the blessings of the work of re-creation. Abel and Enoch, Noah and Abraham, Moses and David, Isaiah and Daniel were saved by the same faith as Peter, Paul, Luther, and Calvin. The Covenant of Grace, altho made with Abraham and for a time connected with the national life of Israel, existed already in Paradise. The theologians of the Reformed churches have clearly unfolded the truth, that God's elect of both Dispensations entered the same gate of righteousness and walked the same way of salva- tion which they still walk to the marriage-supper of the Lamb. But how could Abraham, living so many years before Christ, in whom alone grace and truth have been revealed, have his faith accounted unto him for righteousness, so that he saw the day of Jesus and was glad? This difficulty has confused many minds regarding the Old and New Dispensations, and causes many vainly to ask : How could there be any saving operation of the Holy Spirit in the Old Testament if He were poured out only on Pentecost? The answer is found in the almost unsearchable work of the Holy Spirit, whereby, on the one hand. He brought into the history of our race that eternal sal- vation already finished and complete which must run through the periods of preparation, revelation, and fruit-bearing; and whereby, on the other hand, during the preparatory period, this very prepa- ration was made the means, through wondrous grace, of saving souls even before the Incarnation of the Word. XI. The Church Before and After Christ. " All these having obtained a good report through faith, received not the promise." — Heb. xi. 39. Clearness requires to distinguish two operations of the Holy Spirit in the work of re-creation before the Advent, viz., (i) pre- paring redemption for the whole Church, and (2) regenerating and sanctifying the saints then living. If there had been no elect before Christ, so that He had no church until Pentecost; and if, like Balaam and Saul, the bearers of the Old Testament revelation had been without personal interest in Messiah, then it is self-evident that, before the Advent, the Holy Spirit could have had but one work of re-creation, viz., the prepara- tion of the coming salvation. But since God had a church from the beginning of the world, and nearly all the bearers of the revelation were partakers of His salvation, the Spirit's re-creative work must consist of two parts : first, of the preparation of redemption for the whole Church ; and, secondly, of the sanctification and consolation of the Old Testament saints. However, these two operations are not independent, like two separate water-courses, but are like drops of rain falling in the same stream of revelation. They are not even like two streams of different colors mingling in the same river-bed; for neither did the one contain anything for the Church of the future which had not meaning also for the saints of the Old Covenant; nor did the latter receive any revelation or commandment without significance also for the Church of the New Covenant. The Holy Spirit so inter- wove and interlaced this twofold work that what was the preparing of redemption for us, was at the same time revelation and exercise of faith for the Old Testament saints; while, on the other hand, He used their personal life, conflict, suffering, and hope as the canvas upon which He embroidered the revelation of redemption for us. THE CHURCH BEFORE AND AFTER CHRIST 53 Not that the revelation of old did not contain a large element that had a different sense and purpose for them from what it has for us. Before Christ, the entire service of types and shadows had significance which it lost immediately after the Advent. To con- tinue it after the Advent would be equivalent to a denial and repu- diation of His coming. One's shadow goes before him; when he steps into the light the shadow disappears. Hence the Holy Spirit performed a special work for the saints of God by giving them a temporary service of types and shadows. That this service overshadowed all their life made its impres- sion all the stronger. This shadow lay upon Israel's entire history ; was outlined in all their men from Abraham to John the Baptist; fell upon the judicial and political systems, and more heavily upon the social and domestic life ; and in purest images lay upon the serv- ice of worship. Hence the Old Testament passages which refer to this service have not the meaning for us which they had for them, Every feature of it had a binding force for them. On the contrary, we do not circumcise our boys, but baptize our children ; we do not eat the Passover, nor observe the Feast of Tabernacles, nor sacrifice the blood of bulls or heifers, as every discriminating reader of the Old Testament understands. And they who in the New Testament Dispensation seek to reintroduce tithing, or to restore the kingdom and the judiciary of the days of the Old Testanie?it, undertake, ac- cording to past experience, a hopeless task: their efforts show poor success, and their whole attitude proves that they do not enjoy the full measure of the liberty of the children of God. Actually all Christians agree in this, acknowledging that the relation which we sustain toward the law of Moses is altogether different from that of ancient Israel. The Decalogue alone is occasionally cause of contention, espe- cially the Fourth Commandment. There are still Christians who allow no difference between that which has a passing, ceremonial character and that which is perpetually ethical, and who seek to substitute the last day of the week for the Day of the Lord. However, leaving these serious differences alone, we repeat that the Holy Spirit had a special work in the days before Christ, which was intended for the saints of those days, but which has lost for us all its former significance. Not, however, that we may therefore discard this work of the Holy Spirit, and that the books containing these things may be left 54 RE-CREATION unread. This view has obtained currency especially in Germany, where the Old Testament is less read than even the books of the Apocrypha, with the exception of the Psalms and a few selected pericopes. On the contrary, this service of shadows has even in the smallest details a special significance to the New Testament Church ; only the significance is different. This service in the history of the Old Covenant witnesses to us the wonderful deeds of God, whereby of infinite mercy He has delivered us from the power of death and hell. In "Ca.^ personalities of the Old Covenant it reveals the wonderful work of God in im- planting and preserving faith in spite of human depravity and Sa- tanic opposition. The service of ceremonies in the sanctuary shows us the image of Christ and of His glorious redemption in the minu- test details. And finally, the service of shadows in Israel' s political, social,.a,nd. domestic life reveals to us those divine, eternal, and un- changeable principles that, set free from their transient and tem- poral forms, ought to govern the political and social life of the Christian nations throughout all ages. And yet this does not exhaust the significance that this service always had, and still has, for the Christian Church. Not only does it reveal to us the outlines of the spiritual house of God, but it actually operated in our salvation : First, it prepared and preserved amid heathen idolatry a people which, as bearers of the divine oracles, offered the Christ at His coming a place for the sole of His foot and a base of operations.'^ He could no more have come to Athens or Rome than to China or India. No one there could have understood Him, or have furnished instrument or material to build the Church of the New Covenant. The salvation which was cast like a ripe fruit into the lap of the Christian Church had grown upon a tree deeply rooted in this serv- ice of shadows. Hence the history of that period is part of our own, as the life of our childhood and youth remains ours, even tho as men we have put away childish things. Secondly, the knowledge of this service and history, being parts of the Word of God, were instrumental in translating God's children from nature's darkness into His marvelous light. However, as the Holy Spirit performed special work for the saints of those days that has a different tho not less important * In Dutch, " life-center . " THE CHURCH BEFORE AND AFTER CHRIST 55 significance for us, so also He performed a work in those days that was intended more directly for the Church of the New Testament, which also had a different but not less important significance for the saints of the Old Covenant. This was the work of Prophecy. As Christ declares, the purpose of prophecy is to predict future things so that, the events predicted having come to pass, the Church may believe and confess that it was the Lord's work. The Old Testa- ment often states this, and the Lord Jesus declared it to His disci- ples, saying: "And now I have told you, before it come to pass that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe" (John xiv. 29). And again : " Now I tell you before it come to pass, that when it is come to pass ye may believe that I am He" (John xiii. 19). And still more clearly: "But these things have I told you, that when the time shall come, ye may remember that I told you of them." These statements, compared with the words of Isa. xli. 23, xlii- 9, and xliii. 19, leave no doubt as to the design of prophecy. Not that this exhausts prophecy, or that it has no other aims; but its chief and final end is reached only when, on the ground of its fulfilment, the Church believes its God and Savior and magnifies Him in His mighty acts. But while its center of gravity is the fulfilment, i.e., in the Church of the New Testament, it was equally intended for contem- porary saints. For, apart from the prophetic activities that re- ferred solely to the people of Israel living at that time, and the prophecies fulfilled in Israel's national life, prophecy even as boldly outlining Christ yielded precious fruit for the Old Testament saints. Connected with theophanies it produced in their minds such a fixed and tangible form of the Messiah that fellowship with Him, which alone is essential to salvation, was made possible to them by antici- pation, as to us by memory. Not only did this fellowship become possible at the end of the Dispensation, in Isaiah and Zacharias; Christ testifies that Abraham desired to see His day, saw it, and was glad. Ifourtb Cbapten THE HOLY SCRIPTURE OF THE OLD TESTA- MENT. XII. The Holy Scripture. " All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness ; that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works." — 2 Tim, iii. 16, 17. Among the divine works of art produced by the Holy Spirit, the Sacred Scripture stands first. It may seem incredible that the printed pages of a book should excel His spiritual work in human hearts, yet we assign to the Sacred Scripture the most conspicuous place without hesitation. Objectors can never have considered what this holy Book is, or any other book, writing, or language is, or what the putting down of a world of thought in a collection of Sacred Scripture means. We deny that a book, especially such as the Sacred Scripture, opposes a world of divine thought, the current of life, and spiritual experi- ence. A book is not merely paper printed in ink, but is like a portrait — a collection of lines and features in which we see the like- ness of a person. Standing near, we see not the person, but spots and lines of paint; but at the right distance these disappear and we see the likeness of a person. Even now it does not speak to us, for it is the face of a stranger; we may be able to judge the man's character, yet he fails to interest us. But let his child look, and instantly the image which left us cold appeals to him with warmth THE HOLY SCRIPTURE 57 and life, which were invisible to us because our hearts lacked the essentials. What appeals to the child is not in the picture, but in his memory and imagination; the cooperation of the features in the painting and the father's image in his heart makes the likeness speak. This comparison will explain the mysterious effect of the Scrip- ture. Guido de Bres spoke of it in his debates with the Baptists ; " That which we call Holy Scripture is not paper with black im- pressions, but that which addresses our spirits by means of those impressions." Those letters are but tokens of recognition; those words are only the clicks of the telegraph-key signaling thoughts to our spirits along the lines of our visual and auditory nerves. And the thoughts so signaled are not isolated and incoherent, but parts of a complete system that is directly antagonistic to man's thoughts, yet enters their sphere. Reading the Scripture brings to our minds the sphere of divine thoughts so far as needful for us as sinners, in order to glorify God, love our neighbor, and save the soul. This is not a mere collection of beautiful and glttering ideas, but the reflection of the divine life. In God life and thought are united : there can be no life without thought, no thought not the product of life. Not so with us. Falsehood entered us, i.e., we can sever thought from life. Or rather, they are always severed, unless we have voluntarily estab- lished the former unity. Hence our cold abstractions; our speak- ing without doing; our words without power; our thoughts without working; our books that, like plants cut off from their .^oots, wither before they can blossom, much less bear fruit. The difference between divine and human life gives Scripture its uniqueness and precludes antagonism between its letter and its spirit, such as a false exegesis of 2 Cor. iii. 6 might suggest. If the Word of God were dominated by the falsehood that has crept into our hearts, and in the midst of our misery continues to place word and life in opposition as well as separation, then we would take refuge in the standpoint of our dissenting brethren, with their exaltation of the life above the Word. But we need not do so, for the opposition and separation are not in the Scripture. For this reason it is the Holy Scripture ; for it was not lost in the unholy tearing asunder of thought and life, and is therefore distinct from writings in which yawns the gulf between the words and the reality of life. What other writings lack is in this Book ; perfect agree- S8 HOLY SCRIPTURE OF THE OLD TESTAMENT ment between the life reflected in the divine thought and the thoughts which the Word begets in our minds. The Holy Scripture is like a diamond: in the dark it is like a piece of glass, but as soon as the light strikes it the water begins to sparkle, and the scintillation of life greets us. So the Word of God apart from the divine life is valueless, unworthy even of the name of Sacred Scripture. It exists only in connection with this divine life, from which it imparts life-giving thoughts to our minds. It is like the fragrance of a flower-bed that refreshes us only when the flowers and our organs of smell correspond. Hence the illus- tration of the child and his father's picture is exact. While the Bible always flashes thoughts born of the divine life, yet the effects are not the same in all. As a whole, it is the portrait of Him who is the brightness of God's glory and the express image of His Person, aiming either to show us His likeness or to serve as its background. Notice the difference when a child of God and an alien face that image. Not as tho it has nothing to say to the unregenerate — this is a mistake of Methodism which should be corrected.* It addresses itself to all men as the King's Word, and every one must receive its impress in his own way. But while the alien sees only a strange face, which annoys him, contradicts his world, and so repels him, the child of God understands and recognizes it. He is in holiest sym- pathy with the life of the world from which that image greets him. Thus reading what the stranger could not read, he feels that God is speaking to him, whispering peace to his soul. Not as tho the Scripture were only a system of signals to flash thought into the soul ; rather it is the instrument of God to awaken and increase spiritual life, not as by magic, giving a sort of attes- tation of the genuineness of our experience — a fanatical view al- ways opposed and rejected by the Church — but by the Holy Spirit through the use of the Word of God. He regenerates us by the Word. The mode of this operation will be discussed later on ; let it suffice here to say that the opera- tions of the Word and the Holy Spirit never oppose each other, but, as St. Paul declares emphatically, that the Holy Scripture is prepared by the Spirit of God and given to the Church as an instru- ment to perfect God's work in man; as he expresses it; ** That the * For the author's sense of Methodism, see section s in the Preface. THE HOLY SCRIPTURE 59 man of God may be perfect " i.e., a man formerly of the world, made a man of God by divine act, to be perfected by the Holy Spirit; wherefore he is already perfect in Christ through the Word. To this end, as St. Paul declares, the Scripture was inspired of God. Hence this work of art was prepared by the Holy Spirit to lead the new-born man to this high ideal. And to emphasize the thought he adds : " That he may be thoroughly furnished unto all good works." Hence Scripture serves this twofold purpose : * First, as an instrument of the Holy Spirit in His work upon man's heart. Secondly, to qualify man perfectly and to equip him for every good work. Consequently the working of Scripture embraces not only the quickening of faith, but also the exercise of faith. Therefore instead of being a dead-letter, unspiritual, mechanically opposing the spiritual life, it is the very fountain of living water, which, being opened, springs up to eternal life. Hence the Spirit's preparation and preservation of Scripture is not subordinate, but prominent with reference to the life of the entire Church. Or to put it more clearly: if prophecy, e.g., aims first to benefit contemporary generations, and secondly to be part of the Holy Scripture that is to minister comfort to the Church of all ages, the latter is of infinitely higher importance. Hence the chief aim of prophecy was not to benefit the people living at that time, and through Scripture to yield fruit for us only indirectly, but through Scripture to yield fruit for the Church of all ages, and indirectly to benefit the Church of old. XIII. The Scripture a Necessity. "For whatsoever things were written aforetime wore written for our learn- ing, that we through patience and comfort of the Scriptures might have hope." — Rom. xv. 4. That the Bible is the product of the Chief Artist, the Holy Spirit ; that He gave it to the Church and that in the Church He uses it as His instrument, can not be over-emphasized. Not as tho He had lived in the Church of all ages, and given us in Scripture the record of that life, its origin and history, so that the life was the real substance and the Scripture the accident; rather the Scripture was the end of all that preceded and the in- strument of all that followed. With the dawn of the Day of days the Sacred Volume will un- doubtedly disappear. As the New Jerusalem will need no sun, moon, or temple, but the Lord God will be its light, so will there be no need of Scripture, for the revelation of God shall reach His elect directly through the unveiled Word. But so long -as the Church is on earth, face-to-face communion withheld, and our hearts accessible only by the avenues of this imperfect existence. Scripture must remain the indispensable instrument by which the Triune God prepares men's souls for higher glory. The cause of this lies in our personality. We think, we are self- conscious, and the threefold world about and above and within us is reflected in our thoughts. The man of confused or unformed con- sciousness or one insane can not act as a man. True, there are depths in our hearts which the plummet of our thinking has not sounded ; but the influence that is to affect us deeply, clearly, with outlasting effect upon our personality, must be wrought through our self-consciousness. The history of sin proves it. How did sin enter the world? Did Satan infuse its poison into man's soul while he slept? By no means. THE SCRIPTURE A NECESSITY 6i While Eve was fully herself, Satan began to discuss the matter with her. He wrought upon her consciousness with words and representations, and she, allowing this, drank the poison, fell, and dragged her husband with her. Had not God thus foretold it? Man's fall was to be known neither by his recognized nor by his unrecognized emotions, but by the tree of knowledge of good and evil. The knowledge that caused his fall was not merely abstract, intel- lectual, but vital. Of course the operating cause was external, but it wrought upon his consciousness and bore the form of knowledge. And as his fall, so also must be his restoration. Redemption must come from without, act upon our cotisciousness, and bear the form of knowledge. To affect and win us in our personality we must be touched in the very spot Avhere sin first wounded us, viz., in our proud and haughty self-consciousness. And since our con- sciousness mirrors itself in a world of thought — thoughts expressed in words so intimately connected as to form, as it were, but one word — therefore it was of the highest necessity that a new, divine world of thought should speak to our consciousness in a Word, i.e., in a Scripture. And this is the work of Holy Scripture. Our thought-world is full of falsehood, and so is the outer world. But one thought-world is absolutely true, and that is the world of God's thoughts. Into this world we must be brought, and it into us with the life that belongs to it, as brightness to light. There- fore redemption depends upon faith. To believe is to acknowledge that the entire world of thought within and around us is false, and that only God's world of thought is true and abiding, and as such to accept and confess it. So it is still the Tree of knowledge. But the fruit now taken and enjoyed grows upon the inward plant of self- emptying and self-denial, whereby we renounce our own entire world of thought, no longer judging between good and evil, but faithfully repeating what God teaches, as ever little children in His school. But this would not avail us if God's thoughts came in unintelli- gible words, which would have been the case if the Holy Spirit had used mere words. We know how hopeless it is to try to describe the felicities of heaven. Every effort has been so far a failure. That bliss passes our imagination. And the Scripture revelation concerning it is couched in earthly imagery — as a Paradise, a Jeru- salem, or a wedding-feast — which, beautiful as it may be, leaves no 62 HOLY SCRIPTURE OF THE OLD TESTAMENT clear impressions. We know heaven must be beautiful and en- trancing, but a concrete conception of it is out of the question. Nor can we have clear ideas of the relation of the glorified Son of man to the Trinity, His sitting at the right hand of God, the life of the redeemed, and their condition when, passing from the cham- bers of death, they enter the palace of the great King. Hence if the Holy Spirit had presented the world of divine thoughts concerning our salvation in writing directly from heaven, a clear conception of the subject would have been impossible. Our conception would have been vague and figurative as that concern- ing heaven. Hence these thoughts were not directly written, but translated into the life of this world, which gave 'Co.qvsx form and shape; and thus they came down to us in human language, in the pages of a book. Without this there could not even be a language to em- body such sacred and glorious realities. St. Paul had visions, i.e., he was freed from the limitations of consciousness and enabled to contemplate heavenly things; but having returned to his limita- tions, could not speak of what he had seen, as he said : " They are unspeakable." And that the equally unspeakable things of salvation may be rendered expressible in hutnan words, it pleased God to bring to this world the life which originated them ; to accustom our human con- sciousness to them, from it to draw words for them, and thus to exhibit them to every man. God's thoughts are inseparable from His life; hence His life must enter the world before His thoughts, at least at first;. after- ward the thoughts became the vehicle of the life. This appears in the creation of Adam. The first man is created; after him men are born. At first human life appeared at once in full stature; from that life once introduced, new life will be born. First, new life originated by forming Eve from Adam's rib; then, by the union of man and woman. So also here. At first God introduced spiritual life into the world, finished, perfect, by a mir- acle; afterward differently, since the thought introduced as life into this world is pictured to our view. Henceforth the Holy Spirit will use the product of this life to awaken new life. So redemption can not begin with the gift of Holy Scripture to the Church of the Old Covenant. Such Scripture could not be pro- duced until its content is wrought out in life, and redemption is obiectively accomplished. THE SCRIPTURE A NECESSITY 63 But the two should not be separated. Redemption was not first completed and then recorded in Scripture. Such conception would be mechanical and unspiritual, directly contradicted by the nature of Scripture, which is living and life-giving. Scripture was pro- duced spontaneously and gradually by and from redemption. The promise in Paradise already foreshadowed it. For tho redemption precedes Scripture, yet in the regeneration of the first men the Word was not idle ; the Holy Spirit began with speaking to man, acting upon his consciousness. Even in Paradise, and subsequently when the stream of revelation proceeds, a divine Word always pre- cedes the life and is life's instrument, and a divine thought intro- duces redemptive work. And when redemption is fulfilled in Christ He appears first as the Speaker, then as the Worker. The Word that was from the beginning reveals Himself to Israel as the Seal of Prophecy, saying: "This day is this Scripture fulfilled in your ears." Hence the work of the Holy Spirit is never purely magical nor mechanical. Even in the preparatory period He always acted through the Word in translating a soul from death unto life. How- ever, between then and now there is a decided difference : First, then, the Word came to the soul directly by inspiration or by a prophet's address. Now, both these have ceased, and in their stead comes the Word sealed in the Sacred Scripture, interpreted by the Holy Spirit in preaching in the Church. Secondly, then, the bringing in of life was confined to Israel, expressed itself in words and originated relations that strictly sepa- rated the servants of the only true God from the life of the world. Now, this extraordinary, preparatory dispensation is closed; the Israel of God are no more the natural descendants of Abraham, but the spiritual ; the stream of the Church flows through all nations and peoples ; it stands no more outside the world's life and develop- ment, but rather governs them. Thirdly, altho in the Old Dispensation redemption existed partly already in Scripture, and the Psalmist shows everywhere his devotion thereto, yet Scripture could be used so to a small extent only, and needed constant supplementing by direct revelations and prophecies. But now. Scripture reveals the whole counsel of God, and nothing can be added to it. Wo to him who dares dimin- ish or increase this Book of Life which discloses the world of divine thought 1 64 HOLY SCRIPTURE OF THE OLD TESTAMENT But notwithstanding differences, the fact remains that the Holy Spirit mastered the problem of bringing to man lost in sin, by human language intelligible to all nations and ages, the world of divine thoughts, so as to use them as the instrument of man's quickening. It does not alter the case that the Holy Scripture shows so many seams and uneven places, and looks different from what we should expect. The chief virtue of this masterpiece was so to enfold God's thoughts in our sinful life that out of our language they could form a speech in which to proclaim through the ages, to all nations, the mighty words of God. This masterpiece is finished and lies before us in the Holy Scripture. And instead of losing itself in criticizing these apparent defects, the Church of all ages has received it with adoration and thanksgiving; has preserved it, tasted it, enjoyed it, and always believed to find eternal life in it. Not as tho critical and historical examination were prohibited. Such endeavor for the glory of God is highly commendable. But as the physiologist's search for the genesis of human life becomes sinful if immodest or dangerous to unborn life, so does every criti- cism of Holy Scripture become sinful and culpable if irreverent or seeking to destroy the life of God's Word in the consciousness of the Church. XIV. The Revelation to Which the Scripture of the Old Testament Owes Its Existence. " O Lord, . . . Thou art stronger than I, and hast prevailed."— y^r. xx. 7. The understanding of the Holy Spirit's work in Scripture requires us to distinguish the preparatmi, and the formation that was the outcome of the preparation. We will discuss these two separately. The Holy Spirit prepared for Scripture by the operations which from Paradise to Patmos supernaturally apprehended the sinful life of this world, and thus raised up believing men who formed the developing Church. This will seem very foolish if we consider the Scripture a mere paper-book, a lifeless object, but not if we hear God speaking therein directly to the soul. Severed from the divine life, the Scripture is unprofitable, a letter that killeth. But when we real- ize that it radiates God's love and mercy in such form as to trans- form our life and address our consciousness, we see that the super- natural revelation of the life of God must precede the radiation. The revelation of God's tender mercies must precede their scintillation in the human consciousness. First, the revelation of the mystery of Godliness; then, its radiation in the Sacred Scripture, and thence into the heart of God's Church, is the natural and ordained way. For this purpose the Holy Spirit first chose individuals, then a few families, and lastly a whole nation, to be the sphere of His activities ; and in each stage He began His work with the Word, always following the Word of Salvation with the Facts of Salvation. He began this work in Paradise. After the fall, death and con- demnation reigned over the first pair, and in them entombed the race. Had the Spirit left them to themselves, with the germ of death ever developing in them, no star of hope would ever have arisen for the human race. 5 66 HOLY SCRIPTURE OF THE OLD TESTAMENT Therefore the Holy Spirit introduces His work at the very begin- ning of the development of the race. The first germ of the mystery of Godliness was already implanted in Adam, and the first mother- word of which the Holy Scripture was to be born was whispered into his ear. This word was followed by the deed. God's word does not return void; it is not a sound, but a power. It is a plowshare subsoiling the soul. Behind the word stands the propelling power of the Holy Spirit, and thus it becomes effectual, and changes the whole condition of things. We see it in Adam and Eve ; especially in Enoch ; and " By faith Abel obtained witness that he was righteous." After these operations in individuals the Spirit's work in the family begins, partly in Noah, more especially in Abraham. The judgment of the flood had completely changed former rela- tions, had caused a new generation to arise, and perhaps had changed the physical relations between the earth and its atmos- phere. And then, for the first time, the Holy Spirit begins to work in the family. Our Ritual of Baptism points emphatically to Noah and his eight, which has often been a stumbling-block to a thought- less unspirituality. And yet needlessly, for by pointing to Noah our fathers meant to indicate, in that sacramental prayer, that it is not the baptism of individuals, but of \\\q people of God, i.e., of the Church and its seed. And since the salvation of families emerges first in the history of Noah and his family after the flood, it was perfectly correct to point to the salvation of Noah and his family as God's first revelation of salvation for us and our seed. But the work of the Holy Spirit in Noah's family is only pre- liminary. Noah and his sons still belong to the old world. They formed a transition. After Noah the holy line disappears, and from Shem to Terah the Holy Spirit's work remains invisible. But with Terah it appears in clearest light; for now Abraham goes out. not with sons, but alone. The promised son was still resting in the hand of God. And he could not beget him but dy faith; so that God could truly say, "I am the Almighty God,";'.^., a God "who quickeneth the dead and calleth the things that are not as tho they were." Hence Abraham's family is almost in literal sense the prod- uct of the Holy's Spirit's work in that there is nothing in his life without faith. The product of art in Abraham's history is not the image of a pious shepherd-king or virtuous patriarch, but the won- REVELATION AS TO THE OLD TESTAMENT 67 derful work of the Holy Spirit operating in an old man — who again and again "kicks against the pricks," who brings forth out of his own heart nothing but unbelief — working in him a stedfast and immovable faith, bringing that faith into direct connection with his family life. Abraham is called " the Father of the Faithful," not in the superficial sense of a spiritual connection between our faith and Abraham's history, but because the faith of Abraham was inter- woven with the fact of Isaac's birth, whom he obtained by faith, and of whom there was given him a seed as the stars of the heaven and as the sand of the seashore. From the individual the Holy Spirit's work passes into the family, and thence into the nation. Thus Israel receives his being. It was Israel, i.e., not one of the nations, but a people newly cre- ated, added to the nations, received among their number, perpetu- ally distinct from all other nations in origin and significance. And this people is also born of faith. To this end God casts it into death : on Moriah; in Jacob's flight; in the distresses of Joseph, and in the fears of Moses; alongside the fiery furnaces of Pithon and Ramses; when the infants of the Hebrews floated on the Nile. And from this death it is again and again faith that saves and delivers, and there- fore the Holy Spirit who continues His glorious work in the gene- ration and regeneration of this coming people. After this people is born it is again thrown into death : first, in the wilderness ; then, during the time of the Judges; finally, in the Exile. Yet it can not die, for it carries in its bosom the hope of the promise. However maimed, plagued, and decimated, it multiplies again and again ; for the Lord's promise fails not, and in spite of shameful backslidings and apostasy, Israel manifests the glory of a people born, living, and dying by faith. Thus the work of the Holy Spirit passes through these three stages: Abel, Abraham, Moses; the individual, the family, the nation. In each of these three the work of the Holy Spirit is visi- ble, inasmuch as everything is wrought by faith. Is faith not wrought by the Holy Spirit? Very well; by faith Abel obtained witness; by faith Abraham received the son of the promise; and by faith Israel passed through the Red Sea. And what is the relation between life and the word of life dur- ing these three stages.^ Is it, as according to current representa- 6S HOLY SCRIPTURE OF THE OLD TESTAMENT tions, first life, and then the word springing therefrom as token of the conscious life? Evidently history proves the very opposite. In Paradise the word precedes and the life follows. To Abraham in Ur of the Chal- dees, first the word . " Get thee out from thy country, and I will bless thee, and in thee shall all the families of the earth be blessed." In the case of Moses it is first the word in the burning bush and then the passage through the Red Sea. This is the Lord's ap- pointed way. He first speaks, then works. Or more correctly. He speaks, and by speaking He quickens. These two stand in closest connection. Not as tho the word causes life ; for the Eternal and Triune God is the only Cause, Source, and Fountain of life. But the word is the instrument with which He wills to complete His work in our hearts. We can not stop here to consider the work of the Father and the Son, which either preceded or followed that of the Holy Spirit, and which is interwoven with it. Of the miracles we speak only be- cause we discover in them a special twofold work of the Holy Spirit. The working of the miracle is of the Father and of the Son, and not so much of the Holy Spirit. But often as it pleased God to use men as instruments in the performance of miracles, it is the Spirit's special work to qualify them by working faith in their hearts. Moses smiting the rock believed not, but he imagined that by smiting he himself could produce water from the rock; which God alone can do. To him that believes it is the same whether he speaks or smites the rock. Stick nor tongue can in the least affect it. The power proceeds from God alone. Hence the greatness of the sin of Moses. He thought that he was to be the worker, and not God. And this is the very work of sin in God's people. Hence we see that when Moses cast down his rod, when he cursed the Nile, when Elias and other men of God wrought mira- cles, they did nothing, they only believed. And by virtue of their faith they became to the bystanders the interpreters of God's testi- mony, showing them the works of God and not their own. This is what St. Peter exclaimed : " Why look ye so earnestly on us as tho by our own power or holiness we had made this man to walk?" To work this faith in the hearts of men who were to perform these miracles was the Holy Spirit's first task. His second was to quicken faith in the hearts of those upon whom the miracle was to be wrought. Of Christ it is written, that in Capernaum He could REVELATION AS TO THE OLD TESTAMENT 69 aot do many powerful works because of their unbelief; and we read repeatedly; " Thy faith hath made thee whole." But the miracle alone has no convincing power. The unbeliever begins with denying it. He explains it from natural causes. He neither will nor can see God's hand in it. And when it is so con- vincing that he can not deny it, he says: " It is of the devil." But he will not acknowledge that it is the power of God. Therefore to make the miracle effectual, the Holy Spirit must also open the eyes of them that witness it to see the power of God therein. All our reading of the miracles in our Bible is unprofitable unless the Holy Spirit opens our eyes, and then we see them live, hear their testi- mony, experience their power, and glorify God for His mighty works. XV. The Revelation of the Old Testament in Writing. " Then I said, I will not speak any more in His Name. But His word was in my heart as a burning fire, shut up in my bones : and I was weary with forbearing, but I could not."— y^r. xx. 9. Altho the miracles performed for and in the midst of Israel created a glorious life-center in the midst of the heathen world, yet they did not constitute a Holy Scripture ; for this can not be created except God speak to man, even to His people Israel. " God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in times past unto the fathers by the prophets, hath in these last days spoken unto us by His Son." This divine speaking is not limited to prophecy. God spoke also to others than prophets, e.g., to Eve, Cain, Hagar, etc. To receive a revelation or a vision does not make one a prophet, unless it be accompanied by the command to communicate the revelation to others. The word "nabi," the Scriptural term for prophet, does not indicate a person who receives something of God, but one who brings something to the people. Hence it is a mistake to confine the divine revelation to the prophetic office. In fact, it extends to the whole race in general ; prophecy is only one of its special fea- tures. As to the divine revelation in its widest scope, it is evident from the Scripture that God spoke to men from Adam to the last of the apostles. From Paradise to Patmos revelation runs like a golden thread through every part of Sacred History. As a rule, the Scripture does not treat this divine speaking meta- phorically. There are exceptions, ^.^.,"God spake to the fish" (Jonah ii. 10); "The heavens declare the glory of God, and day unto day uttereth speech " (Psalm xix. 2, 3). However, it can be proven, from a thousand passages against one to the contrary, that the ordinary speaking of the Lord may not be taken in other than the literal sense. This is evident from the call of God to Samuel, OLD TESTAMENT REVELATION IN WRITING 71 which the child mistook for that of Eli. It is evident also from the names, numbers, and localities that are mentioned in this divine speaking ; especially from the dialogues between God and man, as in the history of Abraham in the conflict of his faith concerning the promised seed, and in his intercession for Sodom. And therefore we can not agree with those who would per- suade us that the Lord did not really speak; that if it reads so, it must not be so understood; and that a clearer insight shows that " a certain influence from God affected the inner life of the person addressed. In connection with the person's peculiar character and the influences of his past and present this working gave special clearness to his consciousness, and wrought in him such a convic- tion that, without hesitation, he declared: ' Since I will as God wills, I know that the Lord has thus spoken to me.' *' This repre- sentation we reject as exceedingly pernicious and hurtful to the life of the Church, "We call it false, since it dishonors the truth of God ; and we refuse to tolerate a theology that starts from such premises. It annihilates the authority of the Scripture. Altho commended by the Ethical wing it is exceedingly ««-ethical, inasmuch as it directly opposes the clearly expressed truth of the Word of God. Nay, this divine speaking, whose record the Scripture offers, must be under- stood as real speaking. And what is speaking i Speaking presupposes a person who has a thought that he wishes to transfer directly to the consciousness of another, without the intervention of a third person or of writing or of gesture. Hence when God speaks to man three things are implied : First, that God has a thought which He wills to communicate to man. Second, that He executes His design in a direct way. Third, that the person addressed now possesses the divine thought with this result, that he is conscious of the same idea which a moment ago existed only in God. With every explanation doing full justice to these thrae points we will agree; every other we reject. As to the question whether speech is possible without sound, we answer: "No, not among men." Surely the Lord can speak and has spoken at times by means of air-vibrations ; but He can speak to man without the use of either sound or ear. As men we have access to each other's consciousness only by means of the organs of 72 HOLY SCRIPTURE OF THE OLD TESTAMENT sense. We can not communicate with our neighbor except he hear or see or feel our touch. The unfortunate who is devoid of these senses can not receive the slightest information from without. But the Lord our God is not thus limited. He has access to man's heart and consciousness from within. He can impart to our con- sciousness whatever He will in a direct way, without the use of ear- drum, auditory nerve, and vibration of air, Tho a man be stone- deaf, God can make him hear, inwardly speaking to his soul. However, to accomplish this God must condescend to our limita- tions. For the consciousness is subject to the mental conditions of the world in which it lives. A negro, e.g. , can have no other con- sciousness than that developed by his environment and acquired by his language. Speaking to a foreigner unacquainted with our tongue, we must adapt ourselves to his limitations and address him in his own language. Hence in order to make Himself intelligible to man, God must clothe His thoughts in human language and thus convey them to the human consciousness. To the person thus addressed it must seem therefore as tho he had been spoken to in the ordinary way. He received the im- pression that he heard words of human language conveying to him divine thoughts. Hence the divine speaking is always adapted to the capacities of the person addressed. Because in condescension the Lord adapts Himself to every man's consciousness. His speak- ing assumes the form peculiar to every man's condition. What a difference, for instance, between God's word to Cain and that to Ezekiel ! This explains how God could mention names, dates, and various other details; how He could make use of the dialect of a certain period ; of derivation of words, as in the changing of names, as in the case of Abraham and Sarah. This also shows that God's speaking is not limited to godly and susceptible persons prepared to receive a revelation. Adam was wholly unprepared, hiding himself from the presence of God. And so were Cain and Balaam. Even Jeremiah said : " I will not speak any more in His Name. But His word was in my heart as a burn- ing fire, shut up in my bones : and I was weary with forbearing, but I could not" (chap. xx. 9). Hence the divine omnipotence is un- limited. The Lord can impart the knowledge of His will to whom- soever He pleases. The question why He has not spoken for eigh- teen centuries must not be answered, " Because He has lost the power"; but, " Because it seemeth not good to Him." Having once OLD TESTAMENT REVELATION IN WRITING 73 spoken and in the Scripture brought His word to our souls. He is silent now that we may honor the Scripture. However, it should be noticed that in this divine speaking from Paradise to Patmos there is a certain order, unity, and regularity ; wherefore we add : First, the divine speaking was not confined to individuals, but, having a message for all the people, God spoke through His chosen prophets. That God can speak to a whole nation at once is proven by the events of Sinai. But it pleased Him not always to do this. On the contrary, He never spoke to them in that way afterward, but introduced prophetism instead. Hence the peculiar mission of prophetism is to receive the words of God and immediately to com- municate them to the people. God speaks to Abraham what is for Abraham alone; but to Joel, Amos, etc., a message not for them- selves, but for others to whom it must be conveyed. In connection with this we notice the fact that the prophet stands not alone, but in relation with a class of men among whom his mind was gradually prepared to speak to the people, and to receive the divine Oracle. For the peculiar feature of prophecy was the condition of ecstasy, which differed greatly from the way by which God spoke to Moses. Secondly, these divine revelations are mutually related and, taken together, constitute a whole. There is first the foundation, then the superstructure, until finally the illustrious palace of the divine truth and knowledge is completed. Revelation as a whole shows therefore a glorious plan, into which are dovetailed the special revelations to individuals. Thirdly, the speaking of the Lord, especially of the inward word, is peculiarly the work of the Holy Spirit, which, as we have found before, appears most strikingly when God comes into closest contact with the creature. And the consciousness is the most inti- mate part of man's being. Wherefore, as often as the Lord our God enters human consciousness to communicate His thoughts, clothed in human thoughts and speech, the Scripture and the believer honor and adore therein the comforting operation of the Holy Spirit. XVI. Inspiration. " And unto the angel of the church in Sardis write, These things saith He that hath the seven Spirits of God." — Rev. iii. i. We do not speak here of the New Testament. Nothing has con- tributed more to falsify and undermine faith in the Scripture and the orthodox view concerning it than the unhistoric and unnatural practise of considering the Scripture of the Old and the New Testa- ment at the same time. The Old Testament appears first; then came the Word in the flesh ; and only after that the Scripture of the New Testament. In the study of the work of the Holy Spirit the same order ought to be observed. Before we speak of His work in the Incarnation, the inspiration of the New Testament may not even be mentioned. And until the Incarnation, there existed no other Scripture than the Old Testament. The question is now : How is the work of the Holy Spirit to be traced in the construction of that Scripture? We have considered the question how it was prepared. By wonderful works God created a new life in this world ; and, in order to make men believe in these works, He spoke to man either direct- ly or indirectly, i.e., by the prophets. But this did not create ^ Sacred Scripture. If nothing more had been done there would never have been such a Scripture ; for events take place and belong to the past; the word 6nce spoken passes away with the emotion in the consciousness. Human writing is the wonderful gift which God bestowed on man to perpetuate what otherwise would have been forgotten and utterly lost. Tradition falsifies the report. Among holy men this would not be so. But we are sinful men. By sin a lie can be told. Sin is also the cause of our lack of earnestness, and the root of all forgetfulness, carelessness, and thoughtlessness. These are the two factors, lying and carelessness, that rob tradition of its value. INSPIRATION 75 For this reason God gave our race the gift of writing. Whether on wax, on metal, on the face of the rock, on parchment, on papyrus, or on paper, is of no importance ; but that God enabled man to find the art of committing to posterity a thought, a promise, an event, independent from his person, attaching it to something material, so that it could endure and be read by others even after his death — this is of greatest importance. For us, men, reading and writing are means of fellowship. It begins with speaking, which is essential to fellowship. But mere speaking confines it to narrow limits, while reading and writing give it wider scope, extending it to persons far away and to genera- tions yet unborn. Through writing past generations actually live together. Even now we can meet with Moses and David, Isaiah and John, Plato and Cicero ; we can hear them speak and receive their mental utterances. Writing is therefore no contemptible thing as some, who are overspiritual and sneer at the written Word, consider it. On the contrary, it is great and glorious — one of the mighty factors whereby God keeps men and generations in living communication and exercise of love. Its discovery was a won- derful grace, God's gift to man, more than doubling his treasures. The gift has often been abused ; yet even in its rightful use there is ascending glory. How much more glorious appears the art of writing when Dante, Shakespeare, and Schiller write their poetry, than when the pedagogue compiles his spelling-books or the notary public scribbles the lease of a house ! Since writing may be used or abused, may serve low or high purposes, the question arises: "What is its highest end.?" And without the least hesitation we answer : " The writing of the Holy Scripture." As human speech and language are of the Holy Spirit, so is writing also taught us of Him. But while man uses the art to record human thoughts, the Holy Spirit employs it to give fixed and lasting form to the thoughts of .God. Hence there is a human employment of it and a divine. The highest and wholly unique is that in the Holy Scripture. Actually there is no other book which sustains communication among men and generations as does the Sacred Scripture. To honor His own work the Holy Spirit has caused the universal dis- tribution of this book alone, thereby putting men of all stations and classes into communication with the oldest generations of the race. ^d HOLY SCRIPTURE OF THE OLD TESTAMENT From this standpoint the Holy Scripture must be considered, being in fact " the Scripture par excellence." Hence the divine and oft-repeated command: " Write." God did not only speak and act, leaving it to man whether His deeds and the tenor of His w^ords were to be forgotten or remembered ; but He also commanded that they should be recorded in writing. And when just before the announcement and close of the divine revelation to John on Patmos, the Lord commanded him, " Write to the church" of Ephesus, Per- gamos, etc., He repeated in a summary what was the design of all preceding revelations, viz., that they should be written and in the form of a Scripture, a gift of the Holy Spirit, and be deposited in the Church, which for that reason is called the " pillar and ground of the truth." Not, according to a later interpretation, as tho the truth were coticealed in the Church; but, according to the ancient rendering, that Holy Scripture was entrusted to the Church for preservation. However, we do not mean to say that with reference to every verse and chapter the Holy Spirit commanded, " Write," as tho the Scripture as we possess it had come into existence page after page. Assuredly the Scripture is divinely inspired: a statement dis- torted and perverted beyond recognition by our Ethical theolo- gians, if they understand by it that " prophets and apostles were personally animated by the Holy Spirit." This confounds illumiTia- tion with revelation, and revelation with inspiration. " Illumination " is the clearing up of the spiritual consciousness which in His own time the Holy Spirit gives more or less to every child of God. " Revelation" is a communication of the thoughts of God given in extraordinary manner, by a miracle, to prophets and apostles. But "inspiration," wholly distinct from these, is that special and unique operation of the Holy Spirit whereby He directed the minds of the writers of the Scripture in the act of writing. " All Scripture is given by inspiration of God " ; and this has no reference to ordi- nary illumination, nor extraordinary revelation, but to an operation that stands entirely alone and which the Church has always confessed under the name of Inspiration. Hence inspiration is the name of that all-comprehensive operation of the Holy Spirit whereby He has bestowed on the Church a complete and infallible Scripture. We call this operation all-comprehensive, for it was organic, not mechanical. The practise of writing dates back to remote antiquity; pre- INSPIRATION -jy ceded, however, by the preservation of the verbal tradition by the Holy Spirit. This is evident from the narrative of the Creation. Noted physicists like Agassiz, Dana, Guyot, and others have openly declared that the narrative of the Creation recorded many cen- turies ago what so far no man could know of himself, and what at the present time is only partly revealed by the study of geology. Hence the narrative of the Creation is not viytJi, but history. The events took place as recorded in the opening chapters of Genesis. The Creator Himself must have communicated them to man. From Adam to the time when writing was invented the remem- brance of this communication must have been preserved correctly. That there are two narratives of the Creation proves nothing to the contrary. Creation is considered from the natural and from the spiritual points of view ; hence it is perfectly proper that the image of Creation should be completed in a twofold sketch. If Adam did not receive the special charge, yet from the revela- tion itself he obtained the powerful impression that such informa- tion was not designed for himself alone, but for all men. Realizing its importance and the obligation it imposed, succeeding generations have perpetuated the remembrance of God's wonderful words and deeds, first orally, afterward by writing. In this way there grad- ually arose a collection of documents which through Egyptian influence were put in book form by the great men of Israel. These documents being collected, sifted, compiled, and expanded by Moses, formed in his day the beginning of a Holy Scripture prop- erly so called. Whether Moses and those earlier writers were conscious of their inspiration is immaterial; the Holy Spirit directed them, brought to their knowledge what they were to know, sharpened their judg- ment in the choice of documents and records, so that they should decide aright, and gave them a superior maturity of mind that enabled them always to choose the right word. Altho the Holy Spirit spoke directly to men, human speech and language being no human inventions, yet in writing He employed human agencies. But whether He dictates directly, as in the Revelation of St. John, or governs the writing indirectly, as with historians and evangelists, the result is the same : the product is such in form and content as the Holy Spirit designed, an infallible document for the Church of God. Hence the confession of inspiration does not exclude ordinary yS HOLY SCRIPTURE OF THE OLD TESTAMENT numbering, collecting of documents, sifting, recording, etc. It recognizes all these matters which are plainly discernible in Scrip- ture. Style, diction, repetitions, all retain their value. But it must be insisted that the Scripture as a whole, as finally presented to the Church, as to content, selection, and arrangement of docu- ments, structure, and even words, owes its existence to the Holy Spirit, i.e., that the men employed in this work were consciously or unconsciously so controlled and directed by the Spirit, in all their thinking, selecting, sifting, choice of words, and writing, that their final product, delivered to posterity, possessed a perfect warrant of divine and absolute authority. That the Scriptures themselves present a number of objections and in many aspects do not make the impression of absolute inspi- ration does not militate against the other fact that all this spiritual labor was controlled and directed by the Holy Spirit. For the Scripture had to be constructed so as to leave room for the exercise oi faith. It was not intended to be approved by the critical judg- ment and accepted on this ground. This would eliminate faith. Faith takes hold directly with the fulness of our personality. To have faith in the Word, Scripture must not grasp us in our critical thought, but in the life of the soul. To believe in the Scripture is an act of life of which thou, O lifeless man ! art not capable, except the Quickener, the Holy Ghost, enable thee. He that caused Holy Scripture to be written is the same that must teach thee to read it. Without Him this product of divine art can not affect thee. Hence we believe : First, that the Holy Spirit chose this human construction of the Scripture purposely, that we as men might more readily live in it. Secondly, that these stumbling-blocks were introduced that it might be impossible for us to lay hold of its content with mere intellectual grasp, without the exercise of faith. jffttb Cbapter. THE INCARNATION OF THE WORD.* XVII. Like One of Us. " But a body Thou hast prepared Me." — Heb. x. 5. The completion of the Old Testament did not finish the work that the Holy Spirit undertook for the whole Church. The Scrip- ture may be the instrument whereby to act upon the consciousness of the sinner and to open his eyes to the beauty of the divine life, but it can not impart that life to the Church. Hence it is followed by another work of the Holy Spirit, viz., thQ preparation of the body of Christ. The well-known words of Psalm xl. 6, 7 : " Sacrifice and offering Thou didst not desire ; 7?iine ears Thou hast pierced ; burnt-offering and sin-offering hast Thou not required. Then said I, Lo, I come: in the volume of the book it is written of me," — are rendered by St. Paul : " Sacrifice and offering Thou wouldst not, but a body Thou hast prepared me ; in burnt-offerings and sin-offerings Thou hast no pleasure: lo, I come, in the volume of the book it is written of me." We do not discuss how the words, " Mine ears hast Thou pierced," can mean also, " A body Thou hast prepared me." For our present purpose it is immaterial whether one says with Junius ; " The ear is a member of the body; by the piercing of the ear hearing becomes possible ; and only by the hearing does the body become an instru- ment of obedience " ; or with another : " As the body of the slave became an instrument of obedience by the piercing of the ear, so ♦Owing to the recent publication of the author's work, "The Incarna- tion of the Word," this subject is presented here in an abbreviated form. 8o THE INCARNATION OF THE WORD did the body of Christ become an instrument of obedience by the conception of the Holy Spirit"; or finally: " As the Israelite became a servant by having his ear pierced, so has the Eternal Son adopted the form of a servant by becoming partaker of our flesh and blood." St. Paul's infallible exposition of Psalm xl. 7 does not raise any seri- ous objection to any of these renderings. It suffices our present purpose if it be only acknowledged that, according to Heb. x. 5, the Church must confess that there was a preparation of the body of Christ. This being conceded and taken in connection with what the Gospel relates concerning the conception, it can not be denied that in the preparing of the body of the Lord there is a peculiar work of the Holy Spirit. For the angel said to Mary: "The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee and the power of the Highest shall over- shadow thee ; therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God" (Luke i. 35). And again: " Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife, for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost " (Matt. i. 20). Both passages, apart from their proper meanings, evidently seek to produce the impression that the conception and birth of Jesus are extraordinary; that they did not occur after the will of man, but result from an operation of the Holy Spirit. Like all other outgoing works of God, the preparation of the body of Christ is a divine work common to the three Persons. It is erroneous to say that the Holy Spirit is the Creator of the body of Jesus, or, as some have expressed it, " That the Holy Spirit was the Father of Christ, according to His human nature." Such representations must be rejected, since they destroy the confession of the Holy Trinity. This confession can not be maintained when any of the outgoing works of God are represented as not common to the three Persons. We wish to emphasize, therefore, that not the Holy Spirit alone, but the Triune God, prepared the body of the Mediator. The Father and even the Son cooperated in this divine act. However, as we have seen in Creation and Providence, in this cooperation the work of each Person bears its own distinctive mark. From the Father, of whom are all things, proceeded the material of the body of Christ, the creation of the human soul, and of all His gifts and powers, together with the whole plan of the Incarnation. From the Son, who is the "n^isdom of the Father, disposing and LIKE ONE OF US 81 arranging all things in Creation, proceeded the holy disposition and arrangement with reference to the Incarnation. And as the corre- lated acts of the Father and the Son in Creation and Providence receive animation and perfection through the Holy Spirit, so there is in the Incarnation a peculiar act of the Holy Spirit through which the acts of Father and Son in this mystery receive completion and manifestation. Therefore it is said in Heb. x. 7 of the Triune God : "A body Thou hast prepared Me"; while it is also declared that that which is conceived in Mary is of the Holy Ghost. This, however, may not be explained in the ordinary sense. It might be said that there is nothing wonderful in this, for Job declares (chap, xxxiii. 4), " The Spirit of the Lord hath given me life," and of Christ we read that He was born of Mary, being con- ceived by the Holy Ghost. These two cover the same ground. Both instances connect the birth of a child with an act of the Holy Spirit. While, as regards the birth of Christ, we do not deny this ordinary act of the Holy Spirit, which is essential to the quickening of all life, especially that of a human being, yet we do deny that the conception by the Holy Spirit was the ordinary act. The ancient confession, " I believe in Jesus Christ, His Only-Begotton Son our Lord, who was conceived by the Holy G/iosf,"reiersto a divine miracle and a deep mystery, in which the work of the Holy Spirit must be glorified. Accordingly a complete analysis of this work is impossible. If not, it would cease to be a miracle. Wherefore let us look into this matter only with deepest reverence, and not advance theories contrary to the Word of God. What God has been pleased to reveal we know ; what His Word only hints we can know only in faint outlines; and what is advanced outside of the Word is only the efifort of a meddlesome spirit or unhallowed curiosity. In this work of the Holy Spirit two things must be distinguished: First, the creation of the human nature of Jesus. Secondly, His separation from sinners. On the first point, the Scripture teaches that no man ever could claim paternal connection with Jesus. Joseph appears and acts as the stepfather of Christ; but of a fellowship of life and origin between him and Jesus the Scripture never speaks. Indeed, Jo- seph's neighbors regarded Jesus as the Son of the carpenter, but the Scripture always treats this as an error. St. John, declaring that 6 82 THE INCARNATION OF THE WORD the children of God are bom not of the will of man, nor of the will of the flesh, but of God, undoubtedly borrowed this glorious descrip- tion of our higher birth from the extraordinary act of God which scintillates in the conception and birth of Christ. The fact that Mary was called a virgin ; that Joseph was troubled at the discovery of his bride's condition; that he intended secretly to leave her, and that an angel appeared to him in a dream — in a word, the whole Gospel narrative, as well as the unbroken tradition of the Church, allows no other confession than that the conception and birth of Christ were of Mary the virgin, but not pf Joseph her betrothed husband. Excluding the man, the Scripture thrice puts the Holy Spirit in the foreground as the Author of the conception. St. Matthew says (chap. i. i8): "When Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child by the Holy Ghost.' And again, in ver. 20: " For that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost." Lastly, Luke says (chap. i. 35) : " The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee and the power of the Highest shall over- shadow thee ; therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God." These clear statements do not receive full recognition unless it be plainly confessed that the conception of the germ of a human nature in the womb of the vir- gin was an act of the Holy Spirit. It is not expedient nor lawful to enter more deeply into this matter. How human life originates after conception, whether the embryo immediately contains a human person or whether he is created therein afterward, and other similar questions, must remain unanswered, perhaps forever. We may advance theories, but the Omnipotent God allows ,no man to discover His workings in the hidden laboratories of His creative power. Wherefore all that may be said according to Scripture is contained in the following four particulars : First, in the conception of Christ not a new being was called into life as in all other cases, but One who had existed from eter- nity, and who then entered into vital relation with the human nature. The Scripture clearly reveals this. Christ existed from before the foundation of the world. His goings forth were of old, from the days of eternity. He took upon Himself the form of a servant. Even tho the biologist should discover the mystery of the human birth, it could not reveal anything regarding the conception of the Mediator. LIKE ONE OF US 83 Second, it is not the conception of a human person, but of a human nature. Where a new being is conceived, a human person comes into existence. But when the Person of the Son, who was with the Father from eternity, partakes of our flesh and blood. He adopts our human nature in the unity of His Person, thus becoming a true man ; but it is not the creation of a new person. The Scrip- ture clearly shows this. In Christ appears but one ego, being in the same Person at once the Son of God and the Son of man. Third, from this it follows not that a new flesh was created in Mary as the Mennonites used to teach, but that the fruit in Mary's womb, from which Jesus was born, was taken from and nourished with her own blood— the very blood which through her parents she had received ivova fallen Adam. Last, the Mediator bom of Mary not only partook of our flesh and blood, such as it existed in Adam and as we have inherited it from Adam, but He was bom a true man, thinking, willing, and feeling like other men, susceptible to all the human emotions and sensations that cause the countless thrills and throbs of human life. And yet He was separate from sinners. Of this we speak in the next article. Let this suffice for the fact of the conception, from which fact we derive the precious comfort: " That it coi>ers in the sight of God my sin and guilt wherein I was conceived and brought forth" (Heidel berg Catechism, quest. 36). XVIII. Guiltless and Without Sin. " For such an High Priest became us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and made higher than the heavens." — Heb. vii. 26. Throughout the ages the Church has confessed that Christ took upon Himself real human nature from the virgin Mary, not as it was before the fall, but such as it had become by and after the fall. This is clearly stated in Heb. ii. 14, 17 : " Forasmuch as the chil- dren are partakers of flesh and blood. He also Himself took part of the same. . , . Wherefore in all things it behooved Him to be made like unto His brethren, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people." It was even such a partaking of our nature as would make Him feel Satan's goad, for there follows: " In that He Him- self hath suffered, being tempted. He is able to succor them that are tempted." Upon the authority of the divine Word we can not doubt then that the Son of God became man in our fallen nature. It is our misery, by virtue of the inherited guilt of Adam, that we can not live and act but as partakers of the flesh and blood corrupted by the fall. And since we as children are partakers of flesh and blood, so is He also become partaker of the same. Hence it can not be too strongly emphasized that the Son of God, walking among men, bore the same nature in which we spend our lives ; that His flesh had the same origin as our flesh ; that the blood which ran through His veins is the same as our blood, and came to Him as well as to us from the same fountain in Adam. We must feel, and dare confess, that in Gethsemane our Savior agonized in our flesh and blood ; that it was our flesh and blood that were nailed to the cross. The " blood of reconciliation " is taken from the very blood which thirsts after reconciliation. With equal assurance, however, bowing to the authority of the Scripture, we confess that this intimate union of the Son of God with the fallen human nature does not imply the least participation GUILTLESS AND WITHOUT SIN 85 of our sin and guilt. In the same epistle in which the apostle sets forth distinctly the fellowship of Jesus with the human flesh and blood, he bears equally clear testimony to the fact of His sinless- ness, so that every misunderstanding may be obviated. As by vir- tue of our conception and birth we are unholy, guilty, and defiled, one with sinners, and therefore burdened with the condemnation of hell, so is the Mediator conceived and born holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, made higher than the heavens. And with equal emphasis the apostle declares that sin did not enter into His temp- tations, for, altho tempted in all things, like as we are, yet He was ever without sin. Therefore the mystery of the Incarnation lies in the apparent contradiction of Christ's union with our fallen nature, which on the one hand is so intimate as to make Him susceptible to its tempta- tions, while on the other hand He is completely cut off from all fellowship with its sin. The confession which weakens or elimi- nates either of these factors must, when logically developed, de- generate into serious heresy. By saying, " The Mediator is con- ceived and born in our nature, as it was before the fall," we sever the fellowship between Him and us ; and by allowing that He had the least personal part of our guilt and sin, we sever His fellowship with the divine nature. Does the Scripture not teach then that the Mediator was made sin and bore the curse for us, and " as a worm and no man " suffered deepest distress? We answer : Yea, verily, without this we could have no redemp- tion. But in all this He acted as our Substitute. His own person- ality was not in the least affected by it. His burdening Himself with our sins was a High- Priestly act, performed vicariously. He was made sifi, but never a sinner. Sinner means one who is persoti- ally affected by sin; Christ's person never was. He never had any fellowship with sin other than that of love and compassion, to bear it as our High Priest and Substitute. Yet, tho He was exceedingly sorrowful even unto death, tho He was sorely tempted so that He cried out, " Let this cup pass from Me," in the center of His personal being He remained absolutely free from the least contact with sin. A close examination of the way by which we become partakers of sin will shed more light on this subject. Every individual sin is not of our own begetting only, but a par- ticipation in the common sin, the one mighty sin of the whole 86 THE INCARNATION OF THE WORD race against which the anger of God is kindled. Not only do we partake of this sin by an act of the will as we grow up ; it was ours already in the cradle, in our mother's womb — yea, even in our con- ception. " Conceived and born in sin " is the awful confession which the Church of God's redeemed can never deny. For this reason the Church has always laid such stress upon the doctrine of inherited guilt, as declared by St. Paul in Rom. v. Our inherited guilt does not spring from inherited sin ; on the contrary, we are conceived and born in sin because we stand in inherited guilt. Adam's guilt is imputed to all that were in his loins. Adam lived and fell as our natural and federal head. Our moral life stands in root-relation to his moral life. We were in him. He carried us in himself. His state determined our state. Hence by the righteous judgment of God his guilt was imputed to all his posterity, for as much as, by the will of man, they should successively be born of his loins. By virtue of this inherited guilt we are conceived in sin and born in the participation of sin. God is our Creator, and from His hands we came forth pure and iindefiled. To teach otherwise is to make Him the Author of indi- vidual sin, and to destroy the sense of guilt in the soul. Hence sin, especially original sin, does not originate in our creation by the hand of God, but by our vital relation with the sinful race. Our person does not proceed from our parents. This is in direct con- flict with the indivisibility of spirit, with the Word of God, and its confession that God is our Creator, " who has also made 7/ie." However, all creation is not the same. There is mediate and immediate creation. God created light by immediate creation, but grass and herbs mediately, for they spring from the ground. The same difference exists between the creation of Adam and that of his posterity. The creation of Adam was immediate : not of his body, which was taken from the dust, but of his person, the human being called Adam. His posterity, however, is a mediate creation, for every conception is made to depend upon the will of man. Hence while we come from the hand of God pure and undefiled, we become at the same time partakers of the inherited and imputed guilt of Adam; and by virtue of this inherited guilt, through our conception and birth, God brings us into fellowship with the sin of the race. How this is brought about is an unfathomable mystery; but this is a fact, that we become partakers of the sin of the race by generation, which begins with conception and ends with birth. GUILTLESS AND WITHOUT SIN 87 And now, with reference to the Person of Christ, everything depends upon the question whether the original guilt of Adam was imputed also to the man Jesus Christ. If so, then, like all other men, Christ was conceived and bom in sin by virtue of this original guilt. Where imputed original guilt is, there must be sinful defilement. But, on the other hand, where it is not, sinful defilement can not be ; hence He that is called holy and harmless must be undefiled. Adam's guilt was not imputed to the man Jesus Christ. If it were, then He was also conceived and born in sin; then He did not suffer vicariously, but for Himself personally; then there can be no blood of reconciliation. If the original guilt of Adam was imputed to the man Jesus Christ, then by virtue of His sinful conception and birth He was also subject to death and condemnation, and He could not have received life but by regeneration. Then it also follows that either this Man is Him- self in need of a Mediator, or that we, like Him, can enter into life without a Go-between. But this whole representation is without foundation, and is to be rejected without qualification. The whole Scripture opposes it. Adam's guilt is imputed to his posterity. But Christ is not a descendant of Adam. He existed before Adam. He was not born passively as we, but Himself took upon Him the human flesh. He does not stand under Adam as His head, but is Himself a new Head, having others under Him, of whom He saith: "Behold Me and the children whom Thou hast given Me" (Heb. ii. 13). True, Luke iii. 23, 28 contains the genealogy of Joseph, which closes with the words, "The son of Adam, the son of God"; but the Evangelist adds emphatically, "as was supposed"; hence Jesus was not the son of Joseph. And in Matthew His genealogy stops at Abraham. Altho on Pentecost St. Peter says that David knew that God would raise up Christ out of the fruit of his loins, yet he adds this limitation, " according to the flesh." Moreover, realizing that the Son did not assume a human person, but the human nature, so that His Ego is that of the Person of the Son of God, it neces- sarily follows that Jesus can not be a descendant of Adam; hence the imputation of Adam's guilt to Christ would annihilate the divine Person. Such imputation is utterly out of the question. To Him nothing is imputed. The sins He bore He took upon Him- self voluntarily, vicariously, as our High Priest and Mediator. XIX. The Holy Spirit in the Mystery of the Incarnation. "The Word was made flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory.'"— Jo /in i. 14. There is one more question in the treatment of this subject: What was the extraordinary operation of the Holy Spirit that enabled the Son of God to assume our fallen nature without being defiled by sin? Altho we concede it to be unlawful to pry into that behind the veil which God does not freely open to us, yet we may seek the meaning of the words that embody the mystery ; and this we intend to do in the discussion of this question. The Incarnation of Christ, with reference to His sinlessness, is connected with the being of sin, the character of original sin, the relation between body and soul, regeneration, and the working of the Holy Spirit in believers. Hence it is necessary for a clear understanding to have a correct view of the relation of Christ's human nature to these important matters. Sin is not a spiritual bacillus hiding in the blood of the mother and received into the veins of the child. Sin is not material and tangible ; its nature is moral and spiritual, belonging to the invisi- ble things whose results we can perceive but whose real being escapes detection. Wherefore in opposition to Manicheism and kindred heresies, the Church has always confessed that sin is not a material substance in our flesh and blood, but that it consists in the loss of the original righteousness in which Adam and Eve bloomed and prospered in Paradise. Nor do believers differ on this point, for all acknowledge that sin is the loss of original righteousness. However, tracing the next step in the course of sin, we meet a serious difference between the Church of Rome and our own. The former teaches that Adam came forth perfect from the hand of his Maker, even before he was endowed with original righteousness. HOLY SPIRIT IN MYSTERY OF INCARNATION 89 This implies that the human nature is finished without original righteousness, which is put on him like a robe or ornament. As our present nature is complete without dress or ornament, which are needed only to appear respectable in the world, so was the human nature, according to Rome, complete and perfect in itself without righteousness, which serves only as dress and jewel. But the Reformed churches have always opposed this view, maintain- ing that original righteousness is an essential part of the human nature; hence that the human nature in Adam was not complete without it; that it was not merely added to Adam's nature, but that Adam was created in the possession of it as the direct manifestation of his life. If Adam's nature was perfect before he possessed original right- eousness, it follows that it remains perfect after the loss of it; in which case we describe sin simply as " carentia justiti^ originalis," i.e., the want of original righteousness. This used to be expressed thus : Is original righteousness a natural or supernatural good? If natural, then its loss caused the human nature to be wholly cor- rupt; if supernatural, then its loss might take away the glory and honor of that nature, but as a human nature it retained nearly all of its original power. Bellarminus said that desire, disease, conflict, etc., naturally be- long to human nature; and original righteousness was a golden bridle laid upon this nature, to check and control this desire, dis- ease, conflict, etc. Hence when the golden bridle was lost, disease, desire, conflict, and death broke loose from restraint (torn, iv., chap, v., col. IS, 17, 18). Thomas Aquinas, to whom Calvin was greatly indebted, and whom the present Pope has earnestly com- mended to his priests, had a more correct view. This is evident from his definition of sin. If disease, desire, etc., existed in man when he came from the hand of God, and only supernatural grace can restrain them, then sin is merely the loss of original righteous- ness, hence purely negative. But if original righteousness belongs to human nature and was not simply added to it supematurally, then sin is twofold: first, the loss of original righteousness; second, the ruin and corruption of hujnan nature itself, disorganizing and disjointing it. Thomas Aquinas acknowledges this last aspect, for he teaches (" Summa Theologise," prima secundee, ix., sect. 2, art. I) that sin is not only deprivation and loss, but also a state of corruption, wherein must be distinguished the lack of what ought 90 THE INCARNATION OF THE WORD to be present, i.e., original righteousness, and the presence of what ought to be absent, viz., an abnormal derangement of the parts and powers of the soul. Our fathers held almost the same view. They judged that si« is not material, but the loss of original righteousness. But since original righteousness belongs to the sound human nature, the loss did not leave that nature intact, but damaged, disjointed, and cor- rupted it. To illustrate : A beautiful geranium that adorned the window was killed by the frost. Leaves and flowers withered, leaving only a mass of mildew and decay. What was the cause? Merely the loss of the sun's light and heat. But that was enough; for these belong to the nature of the plant, and are essential to its life and beauty. Deprived of them it remains not what it is, but its nature loses its soundness, and this causes decay, mildew, and poisonous gases, which soon destroy it. So of human nature : In Paradise Adam was like the blooming plant, flourishing in the warmth and brightness of the Lord's presence. By sin he fled from that pres- ence. The result was not merely the loss of light and heat, but since these were essential to his nature, that nature languished, drooped, and withered. The mildew of corruption formed upon it; and the positive process of dissolution was begun, to end only in eternal death. Facts and history prove even now that the human body has weakened since the days of the Reformation ; that bad habits of a certain character sometimes pass from father to child even where the early death of the former precludes propagation by education and example. Hence the difference between Adam, body and soul, before the fall and his descendants after the fall is not merely the loss of the Sun of Righteousness, which by nature shines no longer upon them, but the damage caused by this loss to the human nature, in body and soul, which thereby are weakened, diseased, corrupted, and thrown out of balance. This corrupt nature passes from the father to the child, as the Confession of Faith expresses it in article xv. : " That original sin is a corruption of the whole nature, and an hereditary disease, where- with infants themselves are infected in their mother's womb, and which produces in man all sorts of sin, being in him as a root thereof." However, the relation between a person and his ego must be HOLY SPIRIT IN MYSTERY OF INCARNATION 91 taken into account. The disordered condition of our flesh and blood inclines and incites to sin, a fact that has been observed in the victims of certain terrible diseases as their effect. But this could not result in sin if there were no personal ego to allow itselt to be excited. Again, tho the unbalanced powers of the soul which cause the darkening of the understanding, the blunting of the sensi- bilities, and the weakening of the will arouse the passions, yet even this could not result in sin if no personal ego were affected by this working. Hence sin puts its own mark upon this corrup- tion only when the personal ego turns away from God, and in that disordered soul and diseased body stands condemned before Him. If according to established law the unclean brings forth the unclean, and if God has made our birth to depend upon generation by sinful men, it must follow that by nature we are bom — first, without original righteousness; secondly, with an impaired body; thirdly, with a soul out of harmony with itself, lastly, with a personal ego which is turned away from God. All of which would apply to the Person of the Mediator if, like one of us, He had been born a human person by the will of man and not of God. But since He was not born a human person, but took our human nature upon Himself, and was conceived not by the will of man, but by an operation of the Holy Spirit, there could not be in Him an ego turned away from God, nor could the weakness of His human nature for a moment be a sinful weakness. Or to put it in the concrete : Altho there was in that fallen nature some- thing to incite Him to desire, yet it never became desire. There is a difference between the temptations and conflicts of Jesus and those of ourselves; while our ego and nature desire against God, His holy Ego opposed the incitement of His adopted nature and was never overcome. Hence the proper work of the Holy Spirit consisted in this : First, the creation not of a new person, but of a human nature, which the Son assumed into union with His divine nature in one Person. Second, that the divine-human Ego of the Mediator, who, according to His human nature, also possessed spiritual life, was kept from the inward defilement which by virtue of our birth affected our ego and personality. Hence regeneration, which affects not our nature but our person, is out of the question with reference to Christ. But what Christ 92 THE INCARNATION OF THE WORD needed was the gifts of the Holy Ghost to enable His weakened nature, in increasing measure, to be His instrument in the working out of His holy design; and finally to transform His weakened nature not by regeneration, but by resurrection into a glorious nature, divested of the last trace of weakness and prepared to unfold its highest glory. Sijtb Cbapter. THE MEDIATOR. XX. The Holy Spirit in the Mediator. *' Who through the Eternal Spirit ofifered Himself without spot to God." — }Ieb. ix. 14, The work of the Holy Spirit in the Person of Christ is not exhausted in the Incarnation, but appears conspicuously in the work of the Mediator. We consider this work in the development of His human nature ; in the cotisecration to His office ; in His humiliation unto death j in His resurrection, exaltation, and return in glory. First — The work of the Holy Spirit in the development of the human nature in Jesus. We have said before, and now repeat, that we consider the effort to write the " Life of Jesus" either unlauful or its title a misnomer : a misnomer when, pretending to write a biography of Jesus, the writer simply omits to explain the psychological facts of His life ; unlawful "when he explains these facts from the human nature of Jesus. There never was a life of Jesus in the sense of a human, personal existence ; and the tendency to substitute the various biographies of Jesus of Nazareth for the simple Gospel narratives aims really at nothing else than to place the unique Person of the God-man on the same level with the geniuses and great men of the world , to hu- manize Him, and thus to annihilate the Messiah in Him — in other words, to secularize Him. And against this we solemnly protest with all the power that is in us. The God-human Person of the Lord Jesus did not live a life, but 94 THE MEDIATOR rendered one mighty act of obedience by humbling Himself unto death ; and out of that humbling He ascended not by powers developed from His human nature, but by a mighty and extraordi- nary act of the power of God. Any one who successfully under- took to write the life of Christ could do no more than draw the picture of His human nature. For the divine nature has no history, does not run through a process of time, but remains the same for- evermore. However, this does not prevent us from inquiring, according to the need of our limitations, in what manner the human nature of Christ was developed. And then the Scripture teaches us that there was indeed growth in His human nature. St. Luke relates that Jesus increased in wisdom and stature and in favor with God and men. Hence there was in His human nature a growth and development from the less unto the greater. This would have been impossible if in the Messiah the divine nature had taken the place of the human ego; for then the majesty of the Godhead would always and completely have filled the human nature. But this was not the case. The human nature in the Mediator was real, i.e., in body and soul it existed as it exists in us, and all inworking of divine life, light, and power could manifest itself only by adapting itself to the peculiarities and limitations of the human nature. When maintaining the mistaken view that the development of sinless Adam would have been accomplished without the aid of the Holy Spirit, it is natural to suppose that the sinless nature of Christ did equally develop itself without the assistance of the Spirit, of God. But knowing from the Scripture that not only man's gifts, powers, and faculties, but also their working and exercise are a result of the work of the Holy Spirit, we see the development of the human nature of Jesus in a different light and understand the meaning of the words that He received the Holy Spirit 7vithout ffieasure. For this indicates that His human nature also received the Holy Ghost; and not this only after He had lived for years without Him, but every moment of His existence according to the measure of His capacities. Even in His conception and birth the Holy Spirit effected not only a separation from sin, but He also endowed His human nature with the glorious gifts, powers, and faculties of which that nature is susceptible. Hence His human nature received these gifts, powers, and faculties not from the So;? by communication from the divine nature, but from the Jloly Ghost THE HOLY SPIRIT IN THE MEDIATOR 95 by communication to the human nature; and this should be thoroughly understood. However, His human nature did not receive these gifts, powers, and faculties in full operation, but wholly inoperative. As there are in every infant powers and faculties that will remain dormant, some of them for many years, so there were in the human nature of Christ powers and faculties which for a time remained slumbering. The Holy Spirit imparted these endowments to His human nature without measure — John iii. 34. This has reference to a contrast between others, whom the Holy Spirit endowed not without measure, but in limited degree according to their individual calling or des- tin}^ ; and Christ, in whom there is no such distinction or individual- ity— to whom, therefore, gifts, powers, and faculties are imparted in such a measure that He never could feel the lack of any gift of the Holy Spirit. He lacked nothing, possessed all; not by virtue of His divine nature, which can not receive anything, being the eternal fulness itself, but by virtue of His human nature, which was endowed with such glorious gifts by the Holy Spirit. However, this was not all. Not only did the Holy Spirit adorn the human nature of Christ with these endowments, but He also caused them to be exercised, gradually to enter into full activity. This depended upon the succession of the days and years of the time of His humiliation. Altho His heart contamed the germ of all wisdom, yet as a child of one year, e.g.. He could not know the Scripture by means of His human understanding. As the Eternal Son He knew it, for He Himself had given it to His Church. But His human knowledge had no free access to His divine knowledge. On the contrary, while the latter never increased, knowing all things from eternity, the former was to learn everything; it had nothing of itself. This is the increase in wisdom of which St. Luke speaks — an increase not of the faculty, but of its exercise. And this affords us a glimpse into the extent of His humiliation. He that knew all things by virtue of His divine nature began as man with knowing nothing; and that which He knew as a man He acquired by learning it under the influence of the Holy Spirit. And the same applies to His increase in stature and in favor with God and men. Stature refers to His physical growth, inclu- ding all that in the human nature depends upon it. Not created an adult like Adam, but born a child like each of us, Jesus had to grow and develop physically; not by magic, but in reality. When He 96 THE MEDIATOR lay in Mary's lap, or as a boy looked around in his stepfather's shop, He was a child not only in appearance with the wisdom of a venerable, hoary head, but a real child, whose impressions, feelings, sensations, and thoughts kept step with His years. No doubt His development was quick and beautiful, surpassing anything ever seen in other children, so that the aged rabbis in the Temple were astonished when they looked upon the Boy only twelve years old; yet it always remained the development of a child that first lay upon His mother's lap, then learned to walk, gradually became a boy and youth, until He attained the fulness of man's stature. And as the Holy Spirit with every increase of His human nature enlarged the exercise of its powers and faculties, so He did also with reference to the relation of the human nature to God and men, for He increased in favor with God and men. Favor has reference to the unfolding and development of the inward life, and may manifest itself in a twofold way, either pleasing or displeasing to God and men. Of Jesus it is said that in His development such gifts and faculties, dispositions and attributes, powers and qualifi- cations manifested themselves from the inward life of His human nature that God's favor rested upon them, while they affected those around Him in a refreshing and helpful way. Even apart from His Messiahship Jesus stood, with reference to His human nature, during all the days of His humiliation, under the constant and penetrating operation of the Holy Spirit. The Son, who lacked nothing, but as God in union with the Father and the Holy Spirit possessed all things, compassionately adopted our human nature. And inasmuch as it is the peculiarity of that nature to derive its gifts, powers, and faculties not from itself, but from the Holy Spirit, by whose constant operation alone they can be exer- cised, so did the Son not violate this peculiarity, but, altho He was the Son, He did not take its preparation, enriching, and operation into His own hand, but was willing to receive them from the hand of the Holy Spirit. The fact that the Holy Spirit descended upon Jesus at His Bap- tism, altho He had received Him without measure at His concep- tion, can only be explained by keeping in view the difference between iho. personal and official life of Jesus. XXI. Not Like unto Us. "Then was Jesus led up of the Spirit into the wilderness." — Matt. iv. i. The representation that Christ's human nature received anima- ting and qualifying influences and impulses directly from His divine nature, altho on the whole incorrect, contains also some truth. We often distinguish between our ego and nature. We say : " I have my nature against me," or " My nature is in my favor"; hence it follows that our person animates and actuates our nature. Ap- plying this to the Person of the Mediator, we must distinguish between His human nature and His Person. The latter existed from eternity, the former He adopted in time. And since in the Son the divine Person and the divine nature are nearly one, it must be acknowledged that the Godhead of our Lord directly controlled His human nature. This is the meaning of the confession of God's children that His Godhead supported His human nature. But it is wrong to suppose that the divine Person accomplished in His human nature what in us is effected by the Holy Spirit. This would endanger His true and real humanity. The Scripture positively denies it. Second — The work of the Holy Spirit in the consecration of Jesus to His office (see " First," on p. 93). This ought to be carefully noticed, especially since the Church has never sufficiently confessed the influence of the Holy Spirit exerted upon the work of Christ. The general impression is that the work of the Holy Spirit begins when the work of the Mediator on earth is finished, as tho until that time the Holy Spirit cele- brated His divine day of rest. Yet the Scripture teaches us again and again that Christ performed His mediatorial work controlled and impelled by the Holy Spirit. We consider this influence now with reference to His consecration to His office. By the spirit of the prophets already Christ testified of this say- 7 98 THE MEDIATOR ing by the mouth of Isaiah : " The Spirit of the Lord Jehovah is upon me, because the Lord hath anointed me to preach good ti- dings unto the meek." But the great fact which could not be learned from prophecy is that of the descent of the Holy Spirit at Jordan. Surely Isaiah referred partly to this event, but principally to the anointing in the counsel of peace. However, when Jesus went up out of Jordan, and the Holy Spirit descended upon Him like a dove, and a voice was heard from heaven saying, " This is My beloved Son," then only the anointing became actual. In regard to the event itself, only a few words. That Christ's Baptism was not a mere form, but the fulfilling of all righteousness proves that He descended into the water burdened with our sins. Hence St. John makes the words, " Behold the Lamb of God," pre- cede the account of His Baptism. Wherefore it is incorrect to say that Christ was installed into His Messianic office only at His Bap- tism. On the contrary. He was anointed from eternity. Where- fore He may not be represented as being for a moment unconscious, according to the measure of His development, of the Messiah task that rested upon Him. This lay in His holy Person ; it was not added to Him at a later period, but was His before Adam fell. And as in His human consciousness His Person gradually attained stature, it was always the stature of the Messiah. This is evident from His answer when, at the age of twelve. He spoke of the things of His Father which were to occupy Him; and still more clearly from His words to John the Baptist commandingly saying: " Suffer it to be so now, for thus it becometh us to fulfil all righteousness."" And yet it is only at His Baptism that Jesus receives the actual consecration to His office. This is proven from the fact that imme- diately after this He entered publicly upon His office as a Teacher; and also from the event itself, and the voice from heaven pointing to Him as the Messiah ; and especially from the descent of the Holy Spirit, which can not be interpreted in any other way than as His consecration to His holy office. What we have said with reference to the communication of the Holy Spirit qualifying one for office, as in the case of Saul, David, and others, is of direct application here. Altho in His human nature Jesus was personally in constant fellowship with the Holy Spirit, yet the official communication was established only at the time of His Baptism. Yet with this difference, that while in others the person and his office are separated at death, in the Messiah the NOT LIKE UNTO US 99 two remain united even in and after death, to continue so until the moment that He shall deliver the Kingdom unto God the Father, that God may be all in all. Hence the descriptive remark of John : " I saw the Spirit descending from heaven, and it abode on Him " (John i. 32). And finally, to the question why the Person of the Mediator needed this remarkable event and the three signs that accompany it, we answer: First, Christ must be a true man even in His office, wherefore He must be installed according to the human custom. He enters upon His public ministry at thirty; He is publicly installed; and He is anointed with the Holy Spirit. Second, for His human consciousness this striking revelation from heaven was of the utmost necessity. The conflict of the temptation was to be absolute, i.e., indescribable ; hence the impres- sion of His consecration must be indestructible. Third, for the apostles and the Church it was necessary to dis- tinguish unmistakably the true Messiah from all the pseudo-mes- siahs and antichrists. This is the reason of St. John's strong appeal to this event. If the work of the Holy Spirit with reference to the consecration is conspicuous and clearly indicated, the fact that the official influ- ence of the Holy Spirit accompanied the Mediator throughout the entire administration of His office is not less clearly set forth in the Holy Scripture. This appears from the events immediately follow- ing the Baptism. St. Luke relates that Jesus being full of the Holy Spirit, was led by the Spirit into the wilderness. St. Matthew adds: " To be tempted of the devil." Of Elias, Ezekiel, and others it is said that the Spirit took them up and transferred them to some other place. This stands in evident connection with what we read here concerning Jesus. With this difference, however, that while the propelling power came to them from without, Jesus, being full of the Holy Spirit, felt its pressure in the very depths of His soul. And yet, altho operating in His soul, this action of the Holy Spirit was not identical with the impulses of Christ's human nature. Of Himself Jesus would not have gone into the desert; His going there was the result of the Holy Spirit's leading. Only in this way this passage receives its full explanation. That this leading of the Holy Spirit was not limited to this one act appears from St. Luke, who relates (chap. iv. 14) that after the lOO THE MEDIATOR temptation He returned in the power of the Holy Spirit into Gali- lee, thus entering upon the public ministry of His prophetic office. It is evidently the purpose of the Scripture to emphasize the fact of the inability of the human nature which Christ had adopted to accomplish the work of the Messiah without the constant opera- tion and powerful leading of the Holy Spirit, whereby it was so strengthened that it could be the instrument of the Son of God for the performance of His wonderful work. Jesus was conscious of this, and at the beginning of His ministry expressly indicated it. In their synagogue He turned to Isa. Ixi. I, and read to them: " The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because the Lord hath anointed me"; then added: " This day is this Scrip- ture fulfilled in your ears." The Holy Spirit did not support His human nature in the temp- tation and in the opening ministry only, but in all His mighty deeds, as Christ Himself testified : " If I cast out devils by the Spirit ot God, then the Kingdom of God is come unto you" (Matt. xii. 28), Moreover, St. Paul teaches that the gifts of healing and miracles proceed from the Holy Spirit, and this, in connection with the state- ment that these powers worked in Jesus (Mark vi. 14), convinces us that these were the very powers of the Holy Spirit. Again, it is frequently said He rejoiced in the Spirit or was troubled in the Spirit, which may be interpreted as a rejoicing or being troubled in His own spirit; but this is not a complete explanation. When it refers to His own spirit it reads : " And He sighed deeply in His spirit" (Mark viii. 12). But in the other cases we interpret the ex- pressions as pointing to those deeper and more glorious emotions of which our human nature is susceptible only when abiding in the Holy Spirit. For altho St. John states that Jesus groaned in Him- self (chap. xi. 38), this is not contradictory, especially with refer- ence to Jesus. If the Holy Spirit always abode in Him, the same emotion may be attributed both to Him and to the Holy Spirit. Apart, however, from these passages and their interpretations, we have said enough to prove that that part of Christ's work of mediation, beginning with His Baptism and closing in the upper chamber, was marked by the operation, influence, and support of the Holy Spirit. According to the divine counsel, human nature is adapted in creation to the inworking of the Holy Spirit, without which it can not unfold itself any more than the rosebud without the light and NOT LIKE UNTO US lOi influence of the sun. As the ear can not hear without sound, and the eye can not see without light, so is our human nature incom- plete without the light and indwelling of the Holy Spirit. Where- fore, when the Son assumed human nature He took it just as it is, i.e., incapable of any holy action without the power of the Holy Spirit. Hence He was conceived by the Holy Spirit, that from the beginning His human nature should be richly endowed with powers. The Holy Spirit developed these powers; and He was consecrated to His office by the communication to His human nature of the Messianic gifts by which He still intercedes for us as our High Priest, and rules us as our King. And for this reason He was guided, impelled, animated, and supported by the Holy Spirit at every step of His Messianic ministry. There are three differences between this communication of the Holy Spirit to the human nature of Jesus and that in us : First, the Holy Spirit always meets with the resistance of evil in our hearts. Jesus' s heart was without sin and unrighteousness. Hence in His human nature the Holy Spirit met no resistance. Secondly, the Holy Spirit's operation, influence, support, and guidance in our human nature is always individual, i.e., in part, imperfect; in the human nature of Jesus it was central, perfect, leaving no void. Thirdly, in our nature the Holy Spirit meets with an ego which in union with that nature opposes God ; while the Person which He met in the human nature of Christ, partaking of the divine nature, was absolutely holy. For the Son having adopted the human nature in union with His Person, was cooperating with the Holy Spirit. XXII. The Holy Spirit in the Passion of Christ. •'Who through the Eternal Spirit offered Himself." — Heb. ix. 14. Thirdly — Let us now trace the work of the Holy Spirit in the suffering, death, resurrection, atid exaltation of Christ (see " First " and " Second," pp. 93 and 97). In the Epistle to the Hebrews the apostle asks: " If the blood of goats and calves and the ashes of the heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purification of the flesh, how much more shall the blood of Christ purge your conscience from dead works?" add- ing the words : " Who through the Eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God." The meaning of these words has been much disputed. Beza and Gomarus understood the Eternal Spirit to signify Christ's divifie nature. Calvin and the majority of reformers made it to refer to the Holy Spirit. Expositors of the present day, especially those of rationalistic tendencies, understand by it merely the tension of Christ's human nature. With the majority of orthodox expositors we adopt the view of Calvin. The difference between Beza and Calvin is that already referred to. The question is, whether as regards His human nature Christ substituted the inworking of the Son for that of the Holy Spirit; or did He have the ordinary operation of the Holy Spirit? At the present time many have adopted the former view without clearly understanding the difference. They reason thus : " Are the two natures not united in the Person of Jesus? Why, then, should the Holy Spirit be added to qualify the human nature? Could the Son Himself not do this?" And so they reach the conclusion that since the Mediator is God, there could be no need of a work of the Holy Spirit in the human nature of Christ. And yet this view must be rejected, for — First, God has so created human nature that without the Holy Spirit it can not have any virtue or holiness. Adam's original HOLY SPIRIT IN THE PASSION OF CHRIST 103 righteousness was the work and fruit of the Holy Spirit as truly as the new life in the regenerate is to-day. The shining-in of the Holy Spirit is as essential to holiness as the shining of light into the eye is essential to seeing. Second, the work of the Son according to the distinction of three divine Persons is other than the work of the Holy Spirit with reference to the human nature. The Holy Spirit could not become flesh; this the Son alone could do. The Father has not delivered all things to the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit works from the Son ; but the Son depends upon the Holy Spirit for the application of redemption to individuals. The Son adopts our nature, thus rela- ting Himself with the whole race ; but the Holy Spirit alone can so enter into individual souls as to glorify the Son in the children of God. Applying these two principles to the Person of Christ, we see that His human nature could not dispense with the constant in- shining of the Holy Spirit. For which reason Scripture declares: " He gave Him the Spirit without measure." Nor could the Son ac- cording to His own nature take the place of the Holy Spirit; but in the divine economy, by virtue of His union with the human nature, ever depended upon the Holy Spirit. As to the question, whether the Godhead of Christ did not sup- port His humanity, we answer : Undoubtedly ; but never independ- ently of the Holy Spirit. We faint because we resist, grieve, and repel the Holy Spirit. Christ was always victorious because His divinity never relaxed His hold upon the Holy Spirit in His hu- manity, but embraced Him and clave unto Him with all the love and energy of the Son of God. Human nature is limited. It is susceptible of receiving the Holy Spirit so as to be His temple. But that susceptibility has its limits. Opposed by eternal death, it loses its tension and falls away from the fellowship of the Holy Spirit. Hence we have no unlosable good in ourselves, but only as members of the body of Christ. Apart from Him, eternal death would have power over us, would separate us from the Holy Spirit and destroy us. Wherefore all our salvation lies in Christ. He is our anchor cast within the veil. As to the human nature of Christ, it encountered and passed through eternal death. This could not be otherwise. If He had passed only through temporal death, eternal death would still be unvanquished. To the question how His human nature could pass through 104 THE MEDIATOR eternal death and not perish, having no Mediator to support it, we answer: The human nature of Christ would have been overwhelmed by it, the in-shining of the Holy Spirit would have ceased if His divine nature, i.e., the infinite might of His Godhead, had not been underneath it. Hence the apostle declares: "Who through the Eternal Spirit offered Himself"; not through the Holy Spirit. The two expressions are not identical. There is a difference between the Holy Spirit, the third Person in the Godhead, apart from me, and the Holy Spirit working within me. The word of Scripture, " He was full of the Holy Ghost," refers not only to the Person of the Holy Spirit, but also to His work in man's soul. So with reference to Christ, there is a difference between: "He was conceived by the Holy Ghost," "The Holy Ghost descended upon Him," " Being full of the Holy Spirit," " Who offered Himself by the Eternal Spirit." The last two passages indi- cate the fact that the spirit of Jesus had taken in the Holy Spirit and idetitified itself with Him, in almost the same sense as Acts xv. 28: "It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us." The term " Eternal Spirit " was chosen to indicate that the divine-human Per- son of Christ entered into such indissoluble fellowship with the Holy Spirit as even eternal death could not break. A closer examination of the sufferings of Christ will make this clear. Christ did not redeem us by His sufferings alone, being spit upon, scourged, crowned with thorns, crucified, and slain ; but this passion was made effectual to our redemption by His lo-oe and volun- tary obedience. These are generally called His passive and active satisfaction. By the first we understand His actual bearing of pain, anguish, and death ; by the second, His zeal for the honor of God, the love, faithfulness, and divine pity by which He became obedient even unto death — yea, the death of the cross. And these two are essentially distinct. Satan, e.g., bears punishment also and shall bear it forever; but he lacks the willingness. This, however, does not affect the validity of the punishment. A murderer on the gal- lows may curse God and men to the end ; but this does not invali- date his punishment. Whether he curses or prays, it is equally valid. Hence there was in Christ's sufferings much more than mere passive, penal satisfaction. Nobody compelled Jesus. He, par- taker of the divine nature, could not be compelled, but offered HOLY SPIRIT IN THE PASSION OF CHRIST 105 Himself quite voluntarily: "Lo, I come to do Thy will, O God; in the volume of the book it is written of Me." To render that volun- tary sacrifice He had with equal willingness adopted the prepared body : " Who being in the form of God thought it no robbery to be equal with God, but made Himself of no reputation; and being found in fashion as a man, He humbled Himself and became obe- dient unto death, even the death of the cross"; "Who, tho He were a Son, yet learned He obedience." And to give highest proof of this obedience unto death. He inwardly consecrated Himself to death, as He Himself testified: " I sanctify Myself for them." This leads to the important question, whether Jesus rendered this obedience and consecration outside of His human nature, or in it, so that it manifested itself in His human nature. Undoubtedly the latter. The divine nature can not learn, or be tempted; the Son could not love the Father with other than eternal love. In the divine nature there is no i?iore or less. To suppose this is to anni- hilate the divine nature. The statement that, " tho He were the Son, yet learned He obedience," does not mean that as God He learned obedience: for God can not obey. God rules, governs, commands, but never obeys. As King He can serve us only in the form of a slave, hiding His princely majesty, having emptied Himself, standing before us as one despised among men. " Tho He were the Son "means, therefore: altho in His inward Being He is God the Son, yet He stood before us in such lowliness that noth- ing betrayed His divinity; yea, so lowly that He even learned obedience. Wherefore if the Mediator as man showed in His human nature such zeal for God and such pity for sinners that He willingly gave Himself in self-sacrifice unto death, then it is evident that His human nature could not exercise such consecration without the inworking of the Holy Spirit; and again that the Holy Spirit could not have effected such inworking unless the Son willed and desired it. The cry of the Messiah is heard in the words of the psalmist : " I delight to do Thy will, O God." The Son was willing so to empty Him- self that it would be possible for His human nature to pass through eternal death; and to this end He let it be filled with all the mighti- ness of the Spirit of God. Thus the Son offered Himself " through the Eternal Spirit that we might serve the living God." Hence the work of the Holy Spirit in the work of redemption did not begin only at Pentecost, but the same Holy Spirit who in io6 THE MEDIATOR creation animates all life, upholds and qualifies our human nature, and in Israel and the prophets wrought the work of revelation, also prepared the body of Christ, adorned His human nature with gracious gifts, put these gifts into operation, installed Him into His office, led Him into temptation, qualified Him to cast out devils, and finally enabled Him to finish that eternal work of satis- faction whereby our souls are redeemed. This explains why Beza and Gomarus could not be fully satisfied with Calvin's exposition. Calvin said that it was the working of the Holy Spirit apart from the divinity of the Son. And they felt that there was something lacking. For the Son made Himself of no reputation and became obedient; but if all this is the work of the Holy Spirit, then nothing is left of the work of the Son. And to escape from this, they adopted the other extreme, and declared that the Eternal Spirit had reference only to the Son according to His divine nature — an exposition that can not be accepted, for the divine nature is never designated as spirit. Yet they were not altogether wrong. The reconciliation of these contrary views must be looked for in the diflEerence between the existence of the Holy Spirit without us, and Bis 7V or king within us as received by our nature and identified with its own working. And inasmuch as the Son, by His Godhead, enabled His human nature, in the awful conflict with eternal death, to effect this union, there- fore the apostle confesses that the sacrifice of the Mediator was rendered by the working of the Eternal Spirit. XXIII. The Holy Spirit in the Glorified Christ. " Declared to be the Sou of God with power, according to the Spirit of holiness, by the resurrection from the dea.d."—/?om. i. 4. From the foregoing studies it appears that the Holy Spirit per- formed a work in the human nature of Christ as He descended the several steps of His humiliation to the death of the cross. The question now arises, whether He had also a work in the several steps of Christ's exaltation to the excellent glory. />., in His resurrection, ascension, royal dignity, and second coming. Before we answer this question, let us first consider the nature of this work in the exaltation. For it is evident that it must greatly differ from that in His humiliation. In the latter His human nature suffered violence. His sufferings antagonized not only His divine nature, but also His human nature. To suffer pam, insult, and mockery, to be scourged and crucified, goes against human nature. The effort to resist such sufferings and to escape from them is per- fectly natural. Christ's groaning in Gethsemane is the natural utterance of the human feeling. He was burdened with the curse and wrath of God against the sin of the race. Then human nature struggled against the burden, and the cry, " Father, let this cup pass from Me," was the sincere and natural cry of horror which human nature could not repress. And not in Gethsemane alone ; through His whole humiliation He experienced the same, tho in less degree. His self-emptying was not a single loss or bereavement, but a growing poorer and poorer, until at last nothing was left Him but a piece of ground where He could weep and a cross whereon He could die. He renounced all that heart and flesh hold dear, until, without friend or brother, without one tone of love, amid the mocking laughter of His slanderers. He gave up the ghost. Surely He trod the wine- press alone. io8 THE MEDIATOR His humiliation being so deep and real, it is not surprising that the Holy Spirit succored and comforted His human nature so that it was not overwhelmed. P'or it is the proper work of the Holy Spirit by gifts of grace to enable human nature, tempted by sor- row to sin, to stand firm and overcome. He animated Adam before the fall; He comforts and supports all the children of God to-day; and He did the same in the human nature of Jesus. What air is to man's physical nature, the Holy Spirit is to his spiritual nature. Without air there is death in our bodies; without the Holy Spirit there is death in our souls. And as Jesus had to die, tho He was the Son, when breath failed Him, so He could not live according to His human nature, tho He was the Son, except the Holy Spirit dwelt in that nature. Since, according to the spiritual side of His human nature, He was not dead as we are, but was born possessed of the life of God, so it was impossible for His human nature for a single moment to be without the Holy Spirit. But how different in the state of His exaltation ! Honor and glory are not against human nature, but satisfy it. It covets them and longs for them with all its energy of desire. Hence this exal- tation created no conflict in the soul of Jesus. His human nature needed no support to bear it. Hence the question: What, then, could the Holy Spirit do for the human nature in the state of glory? Regarding the resurrection, the Scripture teaches more than once that it was connected with a work of the Holy Spirit. St. Paul says (Rom. i. 4) that Jesus was " declared to be the Son of God, by the Spirit of holiness with power, by the resurrection from' the dead." And St. Peter says (i Peter iii. 18) that Christ " being put to death in the flesh, was quickened by the Spirit," which evidently refers to the resurrection, as the context shows: " For Christ once suffered for our sins, the just for the unjust, that He might bring us to God." His death points to the crucifixion, and His quicken- ing, being the opposite of the latter, undoubtedly refers to His resurrection. In Rom. viii. 11, speaking of our resurrection, St. Paul explains these more or less puzzling utterances, affirming that " if the Spirit of Him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you. He that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by His Spirit that dwelleth in you." This passage tells three things concerning our resurrection: First, that the Triune God shall raise us up. HOLY SPIRIT IN THE GLORIFIED CHRIST 109 Second, that this shall be wrought by a special work of the Holy Spirit. Third, that it shall be effected by the Spirit that dwelleth in us. St. Paul induces us to apply these three to Christ; for He com- pares our resurrection with His, not only as regards the fact, but also as regards the working whereby it was effected. Hence with reference to the latter it must be confessed: First, that the Triune God raised Him from the dead. St. Peter stated this clearly on the day of Pentecost : " Whom God has raised up, having loosed the pains of death"; St. Paul repeated it in Ephes. i. 20, where he speaks of "His mighty power" which He wrought in Christ, when He raised Him from the dead. Second, that God the Holy Spirit performed a peculiar work in the resurrection. Third, that He wrought this work in Christ from within, dwell- ing in Him: " Which dwelleth in you." The nature of this work is apparent from the Holy Spirit's part in Adam's creation and in our birth. If the Spirit kindles and brings forth all life, especially in man, then it was He who re- kindled the spark quenched by sin and death. He did so in Jesus; He will do so in us. The only remaining difficulty is on the third point : " Which dwelleth in you." The work of the Holy Spirit in our creation, and therefore in that of Christ's human nature, came frofti without ; in the resurrection it works from within. Of course persons dying without being temples of the Holy Spirit are excluded. St. Paul speaks exclusively of men whose hearts are His temples. Hence representing Him as dwelling in them, he speaks of Him as the Sj>irit of holiness, and Peter as the " Spirit" indicating that they do not refer to a work of the Holy Spirit in opposition to the spirit of Jesus, but in which His spirit agreed and cooperated. And this harmonizes with Christ's own words, that in the resurrection He would not be passive, but active : " I have power to lay down life and I have power to take it again. This commandment I have received of My Father." The apostles declare again and again not only that Jesus was raised from the dead, but that He has risen. He had thus foretold it, and the angels said: " Behold, He is risen." Hence we reach this conclusion, that the work of the Holy Spirit in the resurrection was different from that in the humiliation ; was similar to that in the creation ; and was performed from within by no THE MEDIATOR the Spirit who dwelt in Him without measure, who continued with Him through Bis death, and in whose work His 07vn spirit fully concurred. The work of the Holy Spirit in the exaltation of Christ is not so easily defined. The Scripture never speaks of it in connection with His ascension, His sitting at the right hand of the Father, nor with the Lord's second coming. Its connection with the descent at Pentecost will be treated in its proper place. Light upon these points can be obtained only from the scattered statements concern- ing the work of the Holy Spirit upon human nature in general. According to Scripture, the Holy Spirit belongs to our nature as the light to the eye ; not only in its sinful condition, but also in the sin- less state. From this we infer that Adam before he fell was not without His inworking; hence that in the heavenly Jerusalem our human nature will possess Him in richer, fuller, more glorious measure. For our sanctified nature is a habitation of God through the Spirit — Ephes. ii. 22. If, therefore, our blessedness in heaven consists in the enjoy- ment of the pleasures of God, and it is the Holy Spirit who comes into contact with our innermost being, it follows that in heaven He can not leave us. And upon this ground we confess, that not only the elect, but the glorified Christ also, who continues to be a true man in heaven, must therefore forever continue to be filled with the Holy Spirit. This our churches have always confessed in the Lit- urgy : " The same Spirit which dwelleth in Christ as the Head and in us as His members." The same Holy Spirit who performed His work in the concep- tion of our Lord, who attended the unfolding of His human nature, who brought into activity every gift and power in Him, who conse- crated Him to His ofiice as the Messiah, who qualified Him for every conflict and temptation, who enabled Him to cast out devils, and who supported Him in His humiliation, passion, and bitter death, was the same Spirit who performed His work in His resur- rection, so that Jesus was justified in the Spirit (i Tim. iii. 16), and who dwells now in the glorified human nature of the Redeemer in the heavenly Jerusalem. In this connection it should be noticed that Jesus said of His body: "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up." The Temple was God's habitation on Zion; hence it was a symbol of that habitation of God that was to be set up in our hearts. HOLY SPIRIT IN THE GLORIFIED CHRIST iii Hence this saying refers not to the indwelling of the Sou in our flesh, but to that of the Holy Spirit in the human nature of Jesus. Wherefore St. Paul writes to the Corinthians : " Know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost, which is in you?" If the apostle calls our bodies temples of the Holy Ghost, why should we take it in another sense with reference to Jesus? Tf Christ dwelt in onr fesh, i.e., in our human nature, body and soul, and if the Holy Ghost dwells, on the contrary, in the temple of our body, we see that Jesus Himself considered His death and resur- rection an awful process of suffering through which He must enter into glory, but without being for a single moment separated from the Holy Spirit. Seventb Cbapter* THE OUTPOURING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT. XXIV. The Outpouring of the Holy Spirit. "The Holy Spirit was not yet given because that Jesus was not yet glorified."— /^,4« vii. 39. We have come to the most difficult part in the discussion of the work of the Holy Spirit, viz., the outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the tenth day after the ascension. In the treatment of this subject it is not our aim to create a new interest in the celebration of Pentecost. We consider this almost impossible. Man's nature is too unspiritual for this. But we shall reverently endeavor to give a clearer insight into this event to those in whose hearts the Holy Spirit has already begun His work. For, however simple the account of the second chapter of the Acts may seem, it is very intricate and hard to explain ; and he who earnestly tries to understand and explain the event will meet more and more serious difficulties as he penetrates more deeply into the inward connection of the Holy Scripture. For this reason we claim not that our exposition will entirely solve this mystery. We shall endeavor only to fix the sanctified mind of the people of God more earnestly upon it, and convince them that on the whole this subject is treated too superficially. Four difficulties meet us in the examination of this event: First, How shall we explain the fact that while the Holy Spirit was poured out only on Pentecost, the saints of the Old Covenant were already partakers of His gifts? Second, How shall we distinguish the outpouring of the Holy Spirit nineteen centuries ago from His entering into the soul of the unconverted to-day? THE OUTPOURING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT 113 Third, How could the apostles — having already confessed the good confession, forsaking all, following Jesus, and upon whom He had Dreathed, saying, " Receive ye the Holy Ghost "—receive the Holy Spirit only on the tenth day after the ascension? Fourth, How are we to explain the mysterious signs that accom- pany the outpouring? There are no angels praising God, but a sound is heard like that of a rushing, mighty wind , the glory of the Lord does not appear, but tongues of fire hover over their heads, there is no theophany, but a speaking in peculiar and uncommon sounds, understood, however, by those present. With reference to the ^rsf difficulty : How to explain the fact that, while the Holy Spirit was poured out only on Pentecost, the saints of the Old Covenant were already partakers of His gifts. Let us put this in the concrete: How are the following passages to be reconciled?—" I am with you, saith the Lord of Hosts, and My Spirit remaineth among you, fear ye not" (Hag. ii. 4, 5) ; and " This spake He of the Holy Spirit which they that believe should receive , for the Holy Spirit was not yet given, because that Jesus was not yet glorified" (John vii. 39). Scripture evidently seeks to impress us with the two facts, that the Holy Spirit came only on the day of Pentecost, and that the same Spirit had wrought already for centuries in the Church of the Old Covenant. Not only does St. John declare definitely that the Holy Spirit was not yet given, but the predictions of the prophets and of Jesus and the whole attitude of the apostles show that this fact may not in the least be weakened. Let us first examine the prophecies. Isaiah, Ezekiel, and Joel bear undeniable witness to the fact that this was the expectation of the prophets. Isaiah says : " The palaces shall be forsaken, the multitudes of the city shall be left — until the Spirit shall be poured upon us from on high ; then the wilderness shall be a fruitful field, and the fruitful field shall be counted for a forest; then judgment shall dwell in the wilderness, and righteousness remain in the fruitful field." This prophecy evidently refers to an outpouring of the Holy Spirit that shall effect a work of salvation on a large scale, for it closes with the promise : " And the work of righteousness shall be peace, and the effect of righteousness, quietness, and assurance forever" (Isa. xxxii. 14-17). In like manner did Ezekiel prophesy : " Then will I sprinkle 8 114 THE OUTPOURING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean; a new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you ; and I will put My Spirit within you, and cause you to walk in My statutes ; and ye shall keep My judgments, and do them ,- and I will save you from all your uncleanness. Not for yourselves will I do this, saith the Lord, be it known unto you" (chap, xxxvi. 25). Ezek. xi. 19 gives the prelude of this prophecy : " Thus saith the Lord God, I will give them one heart, and I will give a new Spirit within them ; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, that they may walk in My statutes." Joel uttered his well-known prophecy : " And it shall come to pass afterward that I will pour My Spirit upon all flesh, and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions ; and also upon thy serv- ants and upon thy handmaidens in those days will I pour out My Spirit" (Joel ii. 30, 31) ; — a prophecy which, according to the author- itative exposition of St. Peter, refers directly to the day of Pentecost. Zechariah adds a beautiful prophecy (xii. 10) : " I will pour out the Spirit of grace and of supplication." It is true that these prophecies were given to Israel during its later period, when the vigorous spiritual life of the nation had already departed. But Moses expressed the same thought in his prophetic prayer: "Would God that all the Lord's people were prophets, and that the Lord would put His Spirit upon them " (Num. xi. 29). But these prophecies are evidence of the Old Testament prophetic conviction that the dispensation of the Holy Spirit -in those days was exceedingly imperfect; that the real dispensation of the Holy Spirit was still tarrying; and that only in the days of the Messiah was it to come in all its fulness and glory. Regarding the second difficulty, our Lord repeatedly put the stamp of His divine authority upon this prophetic conviction, announcing to His disciples the still future coming of the Holy Spirit : " I will pray the Father and He shall give you another Comforter, that He may abide with you forever; even the Spirit of truth, whom the world can not receive, because it seeth Him not, neither knowetb Him, for He dwelleth with you and shall be in you" (John xiv. 16, 17); "When the Comforter is come whom I will send from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which proceedeth from the Father, He shall testify of Me " (John xv. 26) ; " Behold, I send the promise of the Father upon you, and ye shall be endued with power from THE OUTPOURING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT 115 on high " (Luke xxiv. 49) ; " It is expedient for you that I go away ; for if I go not away the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send Him unto you. And when He is come, He will reprove the world of sin, of righteousness, and of judgment " (John xvi. 7, 8). And lastly: He commanded them not to depart from Jerusalem, but to wait for the promise of the Father, " which, saith He, ye have heard of Me ; for John truly baptized with water, but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many days hence. And ye shall receive power after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you" (Acts i. 4, 5, 8). The third difficulty is met by the fact that the communications of the apostles agree with the teaching of Scripture. They actually tarried in Jerusalem, without even attempting to preach during the days between the ascension and Pentecost. And they explain the Pentecost miracle as the fulfilment of the prophecies of Joel and Jesus. They see in it something new and extraordinary; and show us clearly that in their day it was considered that a man who stood outside the Pentecost miracle knew nothing of the Holy Ghost. For the disciples of Ephesus being asked, " Have ye received the Holy Ghost?" answered naively: "We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost." Wherefore it can not be doubted that the Holy Scripture means to teach and convince us that the outpouring of the Holy Spirit on Pentecost was His first and real coming into the Church. But how can this be reconciled with Old Testament passages such as these? — " Yet now be strong, O Zerubbabel, saith the Lord; and be strong, O Joshua, the High Priest; . . . for I am with you, . . . and My Spirit remaineth among you : fear ye not" (Hag. ii. 4, 5); and again : " Then He remembered the days of old, Moses, and His people, saying. Where is He that brought them up out of the sea with the Shepherd of His flock? where is He that put His Holy Spirit within them?" (Isa. Ixiii. 1 1). David is conscious that he had received the Holy Spirit, for after his fall he prays: " Take not Thy Holy Spirit from me" (Psalm li. 13). There was a sending forth of the Spirit, for we read : " Thou sendest forth Thy Spirit, and they are created ; and Thou renewest the face of the earth " (Psalm civ. 30), There seems to have been an actual descending of the Holy Spirit, for Ezekiel says : " The Spirit of the Lord fell upon me " (chap. xi. 5). Micah testified : " Truly I am full of the power by the Spirit of the Lord" (chap. iii. 8). Of John the Baptist it is written, that he ii6 THE OUTPOURING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT should be filled with the Holy Ghost from his mother's womb — Luke i. 15. Even the Lord Himself was filled with the Holy Spirit, whom He received without measure. That Spirit came upon Him at Jordan, how then could He be spoken of as still to come? — a question all the more puzzling since we read that in the evening of the resurrection Jesus breathed upon His disciples, saying: "Receive ye the Holy Ghost" (John xx. 22). It has been necessary to present this large series of testimonies to show our readers the difficulty of the problem which we will endeavor to solve in the next article. XXV. The Holy Spirit in the New Testament Other than in the Old. " By His Spirit which dwelleth in you." — Horn. viii. ii. In order to understand the change inaugurated on Pentecost we must distinguish between the various ways in which the Holy Ghost enters into relationship with the creature. With the Christian Church we confess that the Holy Spirit is true and eternal God, and therefore omnipresent; hence no crea- ture, stone or animal, man or angel, is excluded from His presence. With reference to His omniscience and omnipresence, David sings : " Whither shall I go from Thy Spirit, or whither shall I flee from Thy presence? If I ascend up to heaven, Thou art there ; if I make my bed in hell, behold, Thou art there. If I take the wings of the morning and dwell in the uttermost parts of the sea, even there shall Thy hand lead me and Thy right hand shall hold me." These words state positively that omnipresence belongs to the Holy Spirit ; that neither in heaven nor in hell, in the east nor in the west, is there a spot or point from which He is excluded. This simple consideration is, for the matter under discussion, of the greatest importance; for it follows that the Holy Spirit can not be said ever to have moved from one place to another; to have been among Israel, but not among the nations ; to have been pres- ent after the day of Pentecost where He was not before. All such representations directly oppose the confession of His omnipresence, eternity, and immutability. The Omnipresent One can not go trom one place to another, for He can not come where He is already. And to suppose that He is omnipresent at one time and not at another is inconsistent with His eternal Godhead. The testimony of John the Baptist. " I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, audit abode on Him." and that of St. Luke. "The Holy Spirit fell on all them which heard the Word," may not therefore Ii8 THE OUTPOURING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT be understood as tho the Holy Spirit came to a place where He was not before, which is impossible. However — and this is the first distinction which will throw light upon the matter — David's description of omnipresence applies to local presence in space, but not to the world of spirits. We know not what spirits are, nor what our own spirit is. In the body we can distinguish between nerves and blood, bones and muscles, and we know something of their functions in the organism ; but how a spirit exists, moves, and works, we can not tell. We only know that it exists, moves, and works in an entirely different way from that of the body. When a brother dies nobody opens a door or window for the exit of the soul ; for we know that neither wall nor ceiling can hinder it in its heavenward flight. In prayer we whisper so as not to be overheard ; yet we believe that the man Jesus Christ hears every word. The swiftness of a thought exceeds that of electricity. In a word, the limitations of the material world seem to disappear in the realm of spirits. Even the working of spirit on matter is wonderful. The average weight of an adult is about one hundred and sixty pounds. It takes three or four men to carry a dead body of that weight to the top of a high building; yet when the man was alive his spirit had the power to carry this weight up and down those flights of stairs easily and quickly. But where the spirit takes hold of the body, how it moves it, and where it obtains that swiftness, is for us a perfect mystery. Yet this shows that spirit is subject to laws wholly different from those that govern matter. We emphasize the word law. According to the analogy of faith, there must be laws that govern the spiritual world as there are in the natural; yet owing to our limitations we can not know them. But in heaven we shall know them, and all the glories and particu- lars of the spiritual world, as our physicians know the nerves and tissues of the body. This we know, however, that that which applies to matter does not therefore apply to spirit. God's omnipresence has reference to all space, but not to every spirit. Since God is omnipresent, it does not follow that He also dwells in the spirit of Satan. Hence it is clear that the Holy Spirit can be omnipresent without dwelling in every human soul; and that He can descend without changing place, and yet enter a soul hitherto unoccupied by Him; and that He was present among Israel and among the Gentiles, and yet HOLY SPIRIT IN OLD AND NEW TESTAMENTS 119 manifested Himself among the former and not among the latter. From this it follows that in the spiritual world He can come where He was not; that He came among Israel, not having been among them before , and that then He manifested Himself among them less powerfully and in another way than on and before the day of Pentecost. The Holy Spirit seems to act upon a human being in a twofold manner — from without, or from within. The difference is similar to that in the treatment of the human body by the physician and the surgeon : the former acts upon it by medicines taken inwardly ; the latter by incisions and outward applications. A very defective comparison, indeed, but it may illustrate faintly the twofold opera- tion of the Holy Spirit upon the souls of men. In the beginning we discover only an outward imparting of cer- tain gifts. On Samson He bestows great physical strength. Aho- liab and Bezaleel are endowed with artistic talent to build the tabernacle. Joshua is enriched with military genius. These operations did not touch the center of the soul, and were not saving, but merely external. They become more enduring when they assume an official character as in Saul ; altho in him we find the best evidence of the fact that they are only outward and temporal. They assume a higher character when they receive the prophetic stamp; altho Balaam's example shows us that even thus they pene- trate not to the center of the soul, but affect man only outwardly. But in the Old Testament there was also an inward operation in believers. Believing Israelites were saved. Hence they must have received saving grace. And since saving grace is out of the ques- tion without an inward working of the Holy Spirit, it follows that He was the Worker of faith in Abraham as well as in ourselves. The difference between the two operations is apparent. A per- son outwardly wrought upon may become enriched with outward gifts, while spiritually he remains as poor as ever. Or, having received the inward gift of regeneration, he may be devoid of every talent that adorns man outwardly. Hence we have these three aspects : First, there is the omnipresence of the Holy Spirit in space, the same in heaven and in hell, among Israel and among the nations. Second, there is a spiritual operation of the Holy Spirit accord- ing to choice, which is not omnipresent ; active in heaven, but not in hell ; among Israel, but not among the nations. I20 THE OUTPOURING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT Third, this spiritual operation works either from without, im- parting losable gifts, or from within, imparting the unlosable gift of salvation. We have spoken so far of the work of the Holy Spirit upon indi- vidual persons, which was sufficient to explain that work in the days of the Old Testament. But when we come to the day of Pen- tecost, this no longer suffices. For His particular operation, on and after that day, consists in the extending of His operation to a company of men organically united. God did not create humanity as a string of isolated souls, but as a race. Hence in Adam the souls of all men are fallen and defiled. In like manner the new creation in the realm of grace has not wrought the generation of isolated individuals, but the resurrection of a new race, a peculiar people, a holy priesthood. And this favored race, this peculiar people, this holy priesthood is also organically one and partaking of the same spiritual blessing. The Word of God expresses this by teaching that the elect con- stitute one body, of which all are members, one being a foot, another an eye, and another an ear, etc. — a representation that conveys the idea that the elect mutually sustain the relation of a vital, organic, and spiritual union. And this is not merely outwardly, by mutual love, but much more through a vital communion which is theirs by virtue of their spiritual origin. As our Liturgy beautifully ex- presses it : " For as out of many grains one meal is ground and one bread baked, and out of many berries, being pressed together, one wine floweth and mixeth itself together, so shall we all, who by a true faith are ingrafted into Christ, be altogether one body." This spiritual union of the elect did not exist among Israel, nor could it exist during their time. There was a union of love, but not a spiritual and vital fellowship that sprang from the root of life. This spiritual union of the elect was made possible only by the incarnation of the Son of God. The elect are men consisting of body and soul ; therefore it is partly at least a visible body. And only when in Christ the perfect man was given, who could be the temple of the Holy Spirit body and soul, did the inflowing and out- pouring of the Holy Spirit become established in and through the body thus created. However, this did not occur directly after the birth of Christ, but after His ascension ; for His human nature did not unfold its fullest perfection until after He had ascended, when, as the glori- HOLY SPIRIT IN OLD AND NEW TESTAMENTS 121 fied Son of God, He sat down at the right hand of the Father. Only then the perfect Man was given, who on the one hand could be the temple of the Holy Ghost without hindrance, and on the other unite the spirits of the elect into one body. And when, by His ascension and sitting down at the right hand of God. this had become a fact, when thus the elect had become one body, it was j / perfectly natural that from the Head the indwelling of the Holy 7 Spirit was imparted to the whole body. And thus the Holy Spirit * was poured out into the body of the Lord, His elect, the Church. In this way everything becomes plain and clear : clear why the saints of the Old Testament did not receive the promise, that with- out us they should not be made perfect, waiting for that perfection until the formation of the body of Christ, into which they also were to be incorporated ; clear that the tarrying of the outpouring of the Holy Spirit did not prevent saving grace from operating upon the individual souls of the saints of the Old Covenant; clear the word of John, that the Holy Spirit was not yet given because Jesus was not yet glorified; clear that the apostles were born again long before Pentecost and received official gifts on the evening of the day of the resurrection, altho the outpouring of the Holy Spirit in the body thus formed did not take place until Pentecost. It becomes clear how Jesus could say, " If I go not away the Comforter will not come unto you," and again, " But if I go I will send Him unto you"; for the Holy Spirit was to flow into His body from Himself, who is the Head. It becomes clear also that He would not send Him from Himself, but from the Father; clear why this outpouring of the Spirit into the body of Christ is never repeated, and could occur but once ; and lastly, clear that the Holy Spirit was indeed stand- ing in the midsi of Israel (Isa. Ixiii. 12), working upon the saints from without, while in the New Testament He is said to be wit/iin them. We arrive, therefore, at the following conclusions: First, the elect must constitute one body. Second, they were not so constituted during the days of the Old Covenant, of John the Baptist, and of Christ while on earth. Third, this body did not exist until Christ ascended to heaven and, sitting at the right hand of God, bestowed upon this body its unity, in that God gave Him to be Head over all things to the Church — Ephes. iv. 12. Lastly, Christ as the glorified Head, having formed His spiritual 122 THE OUTPOURING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT body by the vital union of the elect, on the day of Pentecost poured out His Holy Spirit into the whole body, never more to let Him depart from it. That these conclusions contain nothing but what the Church of all ages has confessed appears from the fact that the Reformed churches have always maintained : First, that our communion with the Holy Spirit depends upon our mystic union with the body of which Christ is the Head, which is the underlying thought of the Lord's Supper. Second, that the elect form one body under Christ their Head. Third, that this body began to exist when it received its Head; and that, according to Ephes. i. 22, Christ was given to be the Head after His resurrection and ascension. XXVI. Israel and the Nations. "Because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost."— Acis x. 45. The question that arises with reference to Pentecost is : Since the Holy Spirit imparted saving grace to men before and after Pentecost, what is the difference caused by that descent of the Holy Spirit? An illustration may explain the difference. The rain descends from heaven and man gathers it to quench his thirst. When house- holders collect it each in his own cistern, it comes down for every family separately ; but when, as in modern city life, every house is supplied from the city reservoir, by means of mains and water-pipes, there is no more need of pumps and private cisterns. Suppose that a city whose citizens for ages have been drinking each from his own cistern proposes to construct a reservoir that will supply every home. When the work is completed the water is allowed to run through the system of mains and pipes into every house. It might then be said that on that day the water was poured out into the city. Hitherto it fell upon every man's roof; now it streams through the organized system into every man's house. Apply this to the pouring out of the Holy Spirit, and the differ- ence before and after Pentecost will be apparent. The mild show- ers of the Holy Spirit descended upon Israel of old in drops of saving grace ; but in such a manner only that each gathered of the heavenly rain /of himself, to quench the thirst of each heart separately. So it continued until the coming of Christ. Then there came a change; for He gathered the full stream of the Holy Spirit for us all, in His