^.I«^l»r^j \'0 'Oft *r ^^s^ i^.*3l \^0^ •'f!^M ;#'-3^*"..'^.jtl;,v ji wml' .1 ^^H i^ • •.?' • V-C^i/1: K-.% ':^^'^^ r^^ / j.% fe :^j::-^m^ T RE A T I S E AGAINST Detradion, IN Ten Scdlions.- By Che Reverend Mn Andrew U Mercier^ Pallor of the French Church at B^(?/? in M.W Printed ^t B S T O N in New-Englanif Ai^d Sold by Daniel Henchmath ^ ' 4 7 3 3. »» , ikK.. To the Elders^ Deacons and all the Heads of Families of the ^tttll^ Church of 250ftOtt inil5ett):.eW3la«ll: GentJemcn^avd mejl honoured^ dear Brethren t^.:lct5ifeJfeife E read in the Third Chapter of the •^l^'^^^f^ Book of Ez.ra^ that the Jeiios that ^I^W^,^ returned from ih^ Babylonian Cap- ^&€^>'1X^^ tivity " fhonfed with a great Ihoutj WW^4 W^'W when they praifed the Lord, becaufe the Foundation of the Houfe of the Lord was laid. But many of the Priefts and Levites and chief of the Fathers who were ancien** Men, that had feen the firft Houfe, when the Foundation of this Houfc was laid before their Eyes, wept with a loud Voice, and many ihouted aloud foe Joy ^ fo that the People could not difcern the noife of the ftiout of Joy, from the noife of the weeping of the People : For the People ftiouted with a loud Ihout, &C the noife was heard afar off". One obferves two very ftrong and contrary Pafli- ons in thefe Words, a bitter Sorrow, and a very great Joy. Indeed the building of the Temple o£ GOD, afforded iuft and equal Reafons foi both* ^' ^^ ^ ► -- Thif !1 D E D IC J r I O N. This flcond Houfe wanted the largcnefs, the Gr- ramcnts and icvcral other Advantages that were fecn in the toin)cr built by Solomon ^ lb that there vas occafion lor mourning : liut on the other hand, as by the Mercies and Bkflings cl GOD and the Protection of their Conquerors, whole Heart GOD had wonderfully turned and melted, Chey were reflored to all ttieir religious Liberties, as Prophets \s ere fent to them to encourage them in their Work, by telling them that tlic Glory oi this fecond Houfe, was to exceed that of the former, by the coming of the Hjcfiah into this his Temple, as the pure Service ol GOD was let lip again according to the divine Platform of the I.a\v, they hadjult and gieat Reafonsto praife the 3-ord with a loud, joyful and thanklul Voice. This is our very Ca{c,mo/l dear Brethren.whQXi ve ccniidtr the fiery Persecution of the Chur- clics of GOD in our nativcCountry,the deftrudion of his Sanftuarys, his Rod, rcfting fo heavily and lb long upon ns,we cannot but be affected ^sjcre- z;;//^/) the Prophet, when he forelaw and loietold the Ruin o{ Jerulaleni and the Temple, Ckap^, Our Eyes then muft need be turned into Rivers of Waters to weep Night andDay the Delolation of the Daughter ol our People; but when I'rom that fad Speclacle wecaftour Eyes towards the Mercys of GOD, when we coniidcr how gracioully he hath been pleafcd to give us Places of Refuge, and alter a blood of Miferies,precceded by a Flood of Sins, he hath voucbfafcd to afford us in foreign lPhc, I can contribute Ibme- thing to the Glory of GOD and to Edification of youp p.r.rj r^fhrrr^ ,.\^\^f. Englifli Natioa, DEDICJflON. xf I hive dedicated it to you, Gentlemen ani molt dear Brethren^ as a Token of my Gratitude for the feveral Exp^efficns of your good Will to me, daring all the Time that I have been your Paftor. You have notdtfpifed my Youth, when I firft came among you ^ yoa have fince ex- cufcd my Infirmities, and as I did the fame in re- fped to yours,it has pleafed our Saviour, the Head of his Church, to favour us with an uninterrupted Peace and Union in our Church for the almoft eighteen Years, that I have preached the Word of Salvation to you. By t hat bleffed Peace, our FJock tho' exceeding fmill, hath fubfiiled, and even is enlarged by the addition of fome who were once the Oppofers of our Dodiine, I mean Ro- ^an Catholicks^ feveral of whom have been here converted by the preaching of GOD's Word ; and alfo by the addition of fome Proteftants of Other Nations. That you may profper and grow in Grace, i« the hearty Prayer to GOD of Gentlemen y and mojt dear BrethreVy in the Lord. A, he Mercier. THE PREFACE in the Form of a DIALOGUE B E T W E E N %tttnll\XS and the :3tttl)0?; fcrtullus. SIR, ^??^ Come to ask your Opinion & Thought^ ^ I ^ concerning aConteft I had ycftcrday, with l^^^3i a Gei^tkman upon a point of Morality. Since you come about that Conteft, you will not take it amiis, if I asl^ you thc^ Occafion pf it» fcrtuJJus. I Will do more than that, f ^r I will name you the Peilbn with whom \ dilputed. His Name is Aludcjius. I look upon him as a Man very ridi- culous, in affci^ing a Sentiment very odd and pecu- liar to himlcit ; fjv in a word, he maintained that Painft me, from the great Number of Dctraftor?, it cer- tainly makes more againft you, then agaiull me. Is it not known to every Body that the generality ofMinkindis more inclined to evil than to good? I will grant^that Evil-fpeakcrs are tg be met with PREFACE. in all the Country's in the World, among both Sexes, in all Religions, in all the Ages and Con- ditions of Life, and almoll in all Companies : and that it is even lb much the more common, bee aufe People arc latisfy'd that it is very common: Men admiring foolifhly every thing that is fafliionable. But as I faid befoie, that doth rather condemn than juftify Detraftion. "JertulJus. Not only is It cxtreamly common in theWorlc?,, but befides, it is lb rooted in the Hearts of many PerfonSjthat they feemtolook upon it more like Virtue than a Vice. yluthor. You know that Aretin the famous, or rather infamous Italian Poet, was fo given to that Vice, that it hath been faid of him, that he had fpoken ill of every one but GOD, becaulc he did not knov/ him ^ lor which reafon Ibme ingenious Pcrfon made for him this Latin Epitaph, Condit Jietini Clneres lapis ifle fcpnltos, Mortales atro qui fale perfricuit. Intaclus Deus eft iili, caufimque rogatus, Hanc deditjille, inquit, i on mihi notus erat. In Englilh. Beneath this Stone lie AretineV Remains, fVho oft had plagu'il Mankind vjith hitinn^Strains. ylsk'd by a Fnend, how G O 1) hss flight CQu'd mijS ; Bccattjl'j faid he^ Iknov) not vjho that is M PREFACE. As he was an Athelft, it is no very great won- der that he delighted in Evil fpeaking and fpared No-body, fincc he was afraid of no Puniftimcnt after this Life ; but it feems to me without Cum- parifon more furpriling, that a Chriltian, who be- lieves there is a GOD, holy, juft and a Punifher of evil Words, dares to detrad after that boundlefs Licenfe, which is obferved among many who pro- fefs Chriftianity, fertulhs. What, Sir, doth GOD forbid Detraftion, as you {^zvsx to infmugte it ? Authar. Yes, Sir^ it is contrary to the Words otthc Prophets, to the Rules of Jefus Chrift anc}' of his Apoftles, to the Law of GOD, as well as to that of Nature ; and to fatisfy you about it, ydu have but to refled that it is contrary to the Command- ment that GOD has imprinted in the Hearts of all his rational Creatures, that we ihould deal with cur Neighbours as we defire they would deal with. us. I might eafily back thi^ Argument by fcve- lal others, but it would Cake up too much time j therefore I refer you to a Treatife, which I in- tend ftiortly to publifh upon this Subject. Till you may read it, I advile you as a Friend and ex- hort you as a Chriftian not to detraft any more ; fincc by fo doing you run no Danger for your Sal- vation, not to fay that by Detracting you liiould lay great Obftacles to the eternal Welfare of your Soul, ' " fertnllus. PREFACE. 7crtullus. This Subject IS of very great Importance and requires t® be very cxacWy treated. For my own part, 1 fliou'd be very glad to fee a Volumnupon It, clpecially one coming from you. Yet Detrac- tion prevails fo greatly in the World, that 1 am afraid Icaft the Trouble you take to difluade Men from it, be entirely, or at leaft almoft a Labour lolh And fuppofing that as you lay, it be impof- fiblc to cxcufe or juftify it, I believe it is much more impoffible ftill to put a ftop to it. It is indeed very probable, that moft of thofe that will read my Thoughts, will very little Re- gard them in fuch an Age as this, wherein Men have ftony Hearts, itchingEars, and whofeTongue is a daid, a fcourge, and a fsvord. For whichRea- fon nut perhaps hfty, or forty five, or forty, or thirty, or twenty, or ten of my Readers will im- prove my Diredlions • but if a fingle Perfon got good by it, and kept himfclf from Sin, as Lot i.\\^ in Sodomy I fhould reckon my Time and Labour well fpent; lincc by fhunning this Sin with its Sources, he fhall be in a good way to Hcaven^and fo infinite Happincfs (hail be fecurcd to him, and a great Satistaction procured to me, if by this or any other Means, 1 can procure fo much gQOcl,and fuch unfpcakibic Advantages. What exceeding great Plealurc to mc, if next to G O D, and with his BUfiing, I, tho' duft and aflies, milerablc and iiiiiul Creature, can procure infinite Glory, ever- Ufting PREFACE. laftlng Joy ? M^ Hearts Deftre and Prayer to GOD for Ijtael is, that tuey be Javed : ior I may truly apply to Chriltians, what S. Paul laid of himfelt, Kom. lo. concerning the Jews of his Time. What can ague better with fuch a Prayer than the undertaking ol a Work, the only Scope of which is, to keep Men from Sin & conlcquently from Damnation. That I may do this as effeda- allyas I can,l will follow thcMethcd which fcenis to me the moll uieiul and likely to obtain the noble abovementioned end, by endeavouring to put a Hop t J the general Sources or Gaufes of this Sin. I find feveral, each of them fliall be theSub- jedt of a diftind Difcourle or Seftion. I reckon Ignorance to be the firft of thofe Sources. People detract becaufe they have not a right Idea or TSo^ tion of Detraftion. 2. Becaufe they fuppofe wrongly, that feveral Things and Difcouifes arc free from that Sin, into which they fall, tho' they do not do it willfully. 3. Becaule they do not know^, or do not root out the Gaufes of that Vice. 4. Becaufe they do not mind the various Degrees and the fcveial Gircumftances which oftentimes accompany and always aggravate it. 5. It is be- caufe they are not fenfible of the hcinoufnefs of it, 6. Becaule they do not enough confider its dread- ful Gonfequences and Effcfts. 7. As fome arc doubtful concerning certain particular Gafes, they think it is all one to commit or to ihun it : Or, Becaufe there arc fome Exceptions to the general. Rule a^ainft Detradiion, they admit of no Excep--^^ tions, and detraft in all forts of Gircumftances. 8. Becaufe they flatter themfclycs that fome trf- volous PREFACE. volous Objcclions generally alledged to favour Detiadion, have more weight than all that can be faid againlt it. ^. Bccaule they do not call to Mind often and awfully cnoi:gh, the fliong and gicit Motives that are capable to deter Menfiom Detracting. lo. Jjecaufe they do not ule fuitable Means and Ways to avoid it. Thefe ten Sources I will endeavour to open and afterwards to flop in ten Sections, ^ertuUus. It is a furprifing thing to me, that sltho' our Heart hath been lo long fince, the Obieft of the Study of Mankind, yet they are not con^c yet to the full Knowledge of it, in order to Reform it, and that there is Occafion ftill for new Treatiles that delcribe its depravity and the ways of purify- ing its Corruption. That makes me believe it hath an unfathomable Depth, and is a World, or Earth, in which new Lands are every .Day to be found* jiuthor. This is one of the principal Differences between ■he doftrinal and moral part of Religion. There are in the Dcdrinc, Myftcries and Abyfles, w hich we cannot and mult not dive into. On the con- trary, We are ordered to examin our Hearts, in or- der to know and reform them. Yet thole Two Things arc not to be fcparatcd any more than our Undcrftanding is difiin^t ficm our Will, which are toth f acuiLies.Qi the iaiuq l^iiP^an Soui. St. Paul ^ ... .... .._. > ^-^j^ PRE FA C E, faith on the one fide, that without Faith, it h impofible to 'pleafe G O D -^ and Sr. J awes on the other that f/?///^ without JH or ks n dead. The Myftery of the Incarnation of the eternal Word, as well as feveral other Doctrines and Myftcries, afford us powerial Motives to Godlinefs £<. Charity, and that Charity is the ground of our Hope,\vhich is a fpeculative, and not a pradicai Virtue. fertullus. The Myftcr'es and moral Duties have each of them their Enemies ; but it is certain that more Perfons Sin againft the moral Duties, than the Myfteries of our holy Religion, becaufe there is no Body that performs exadily every thing, every Precept that is commanded in the moral Law^ whereas feveral, entertain a right and juft belief of the Articles and Myfteries of Faith. Author. Therefore it is very neeeffary to write againft thofe Sins which confift in the violation of the moral Duties, to reclaim from Vice, Hell and Mifery thofe who are on the Brink of it, and juft ready to fall into it through their Impenitence ^ that confideration moved me, to caft my Mite in the Lord's Treafury, I mean an Effay which I intend to publifli againft Detraftion. The Con- verfation we have had upon that HcaJ, Ihall be Jifed by me as a Preface to it, " S'srtuUus, PREFACE. T^cTtullus. It Ts time then for us to conclude, and for mc to be gone tor fear of making the Preface too long by a more ample Convcrlation \ and alio that you may havcmorcTime to meditate upon your iubjeft. Mthor. If you pleafe to ftay, wc fhall (peak of other things. TertuUus. No &>, I am obliged to you, 'and return you Thanks lor your Diredions and Exhortations . I vrill endeavour to improve them j and fo I bid you faresvcU, and wifh you good Succefs, Farewell then, Sir. l^mmmmmmmmmmmmmt A TABLE O P T H E s E cr, I. TH E Nature of Dstradion is explained. Article i, Detra&ion is defined, fag, i, Jirtick il Why manyPerfons often confoundDetraftion j3tC^lumj5yj|>.,jJ. Article 3. ■ ' ■ . ■ Flattery is oppofcd to Detradlionj p, €, Article 4. Of the Object of Det ration, f, % The Ufcs of this Secftion^ p. p, SECT, IL Jn how many ways they dctrad j the (Jiyerfity of fjiofewayi almoft infinite, p. 1 1, Article I. Of the Subje. 13, Article ^, Of the Manner of Detradion as to it's Circumftance^p^.^r Article 3. Of the Means made ufc of in Dctra^ion, p. ^9^ Article ^. §ome other ways of detrading, po 27, The Ufes of this Se<^ion, p. 31. sEC'j:'. III. 0f the Soiarcesof Detradion, />. 35. Article I. C)^ftbe external Sources of Detra(^son, />, §^. f. Spqfr^^j Vroff^rit^, p 37- 2^- Source^. /rif^V.^^; M^mp^hp %^f 11 The CONTENTS. A third Source, Impunity ^ p. 39. 4. Source, The Fa- cility of dctracling, p. 40. 5- Source, The frequent Occjfions ive have for JetraElingy p. 40. Jlr title 2. Of the internal Sources of Decradion. i. Source, original Sin, pag. 41. 2. Source, JJlencfs, />. 45. 3. Source, Impudence y * p. 45. 4. Source,The iVc/:? ofTulking, p.^6. 5. Source, Drunkenne/s, p. 47. 6. Source, A fojf and effenjinateComplaifance, p. 48. 7. Source, A ccntradi^ory spirit, ^.48. 8. Source, ZrJiV)' l^Caprice,p, 49 9. Source, Rafi yudgments, p. 49. 10. Source, Curiofity, p. 50. II. 'bou\cc. Contempt, p. 51. 12. Source, The Corrupt jion and Inhumanity of i>etra5iors, p. 52. 19. Source, Ingratitude, p. 54. 14. Source, Interefl and Covetouf- nej's, p. 54. 15 Source, Hypocrify, p. ^6. i6. Source, A falfe and blind Zeal, p. 58. 17. Source, Jealoufy, f.6o. 18. Source, 'Pride and finful Self -Love, p. 61, 19. Source, IVrath, p. 6^. 20. Source, Revenge, p-, ii> Article 9. Reflections on what hath been faid in this Sedlion,/>. 72. The Ulesofthls Scdion, p. 74. s £ c r. jv. Wherein is proved that Detraction is a Sin. Article I . The Law of GOD exprclly forbids it, p. 78. Ay tide 2. Wherein it h proved that Detraction is a ?in, by confe- quences drawn from Palfagcs out of the Old Tcftamcnt. p. 81. Article 3. Detraction proved to be a Sin, by Paffages of the Ncw- Teftamcnt, ^.87. Article 4. That fome of the particular wa> s of detracting areSins,/>.9o." Of Stories, p. 91. Of Raillery , /. 91. Of Outrages and Reproaches, p. 92. Article 5. DetrAcn:ion is contrary to Charity, p. 93. Thif Third Source d^^i not differ roych from the Eigb, t^cnih. Articlt The CONTENTS. iii Article 6. Detraction is contrary to fufticc, and therefore a Sin^ p.^^. Article 7. Dctradion is contrary to the /Vttributcs of GOD, and is one of the Charadcrs of the Devil, ^. ^y. Article 8. Detradrion is contrary to the Defigns of GOD, in giving us the Faculty of Speech, p, 102. Article 9. Detradion is contrary to human Civility, f. 104. Article 10. Detraction is a mean vile Sin, p. 105. Article 11. Detractors are ordinarily more faulty than thofc they talk of, p, 108. Article 12. The greatnefs of this Sin (hown by fome farther Confide- rations, p, iii. Article 13. We are not well avvrareof the greatnefs of this Sin, |>, 114.. The Ufes of this Sedion, p. 116. SECT, IV. Of the various Circumftanccs which aggravate this Sin, p^ 120, Article I . Of the Circumftances with rcfpcCt to the Perfons detracted, p, 120. Gircumftance ift. Of 'Parents and Cbildrpn^ p. no. Circumftance 2d, Oi Brothers^ p. 111, Cir- cumftance 3d, Oi Husbands and Wives, p. 124.. Cir- cumflance 4rh, Of Sovereigns and their Subje^fHj p. \z6. Gircumftance 5th, Concerning Minijlers and their Peo- ple, p, i2p. Circumftance 5th, Concerning ^^«^/^^or5, p. 131. Circumftance 7th, Concerning Majlers and Servants^ p. 152. Circumftance 8th,ConcerningFr#V«ry^, p. 152. Circumftance 9th, Concerning religious or civil Relations^ 134. Circumftance ioth,GonccrnIng Peifon$ affli5ledy p. 134. Jrticle 2. Of the aggravating Circumftanccs with regard to Detrac- •tors in particular. Circumftance i. To ht ih^ fir ft Authcr thor of 2Jetra6lion,p 131. Circumfiance 2d,To 2^^f2># tbe Ferfons that have been back'jittcn, p. 137. a 2 Jrtick w t^c CO Nf E 1^ rs. Article 5. Of the aggravating Circumftanccs with regard to the man-* ncr of decrading. CircumlUncc i. Rap Judgments^ f, 158. Circumftancc id. To "jurire tke ijetrattiotj, Jrttcle 4. Of the Circumftanccs that aggravate Detracflion with re- gard to the Vices and bins we publifh. Circumflance ift. To deride bodily ^sfe5fs, f. 140. Circumitance id. To detra^l from thoje whom violent ^ajjions or Ter^ fecutions have caufed toSi;t, p.u^^. Circuinftancc ;;d/ro mention Sins that have been repented of ^ p. 145 Cir- cumftance 4th, To mention luhat is mofi Jjuntul to our Neighbour*^ Reputation jp. 145. Circumflance 5th, To mem ion thofe Sins^ the freaking of "jchich is forbidden^ f. 14^. Article 5. *rimc and Placi tnay aggravate the Horror of Detractions f. 147. The Ufes of this Section, p, i4p. SECT. VI. Of the Effects of Detradion^ p. 151. Article i. Of the Effefts of Detraction, as referring to Detra^nrs, while in this World, i. \t fpoHstheir judgment, fi^. z. It hurts their Reputation y I '=^'^. i',"Ihcy are hate ei, Article 2. Of the EiTcCls ofDetraftion with regard to our Neighbours, and iirlt, \% to thofe who arc Ipoken ill of ; It hurts their Credit y and oft entities their Soul, p, 161. Article 5. Detracflion is hurtful to thofe that hear us dctracEV, p. 164: Article 4. Dctrac^cion is fomctifncs fatal to the Common-wealth aiid Society, f. 167. Ariiile 5. Dctradlioh is hurtful to thr Church, f^. 170. ^'rrir't 6. •♦jMlie forfowful ttFccf^J of Dctradion ^\'.h icgdr^ to the n!ixr World, p^ i-;6. \ u\i lifts of Wiii bedioni r. 17S. The CO N r E Nf S. V S E Cr. VIL Wherein fomc Doubts and Cafes of Confcicncc are refolved; and "tis fticwn, that al1Decra(ftion is not a 8in. ill Cafc^ It may be done fometimes in Juftice arJ Charity, />. 182. 2d Cafe, It is oftentimes lawful to fpc .k ill of the Dead, f. i8i. 3d Cafe, It is alfo lawful tofpeak lU of Nations and whole Bodies, f, 184* 4th Caf^, Railleries arc lomctimes lawful and fometimes nor^^. 181- 5th Cafe, ConcerningParents ai>d theirChildren, f. i85. 5ch Cafe, Pallors may be acquainted with che Faults of their Peo- ple, as well asParcnts with thulc of their Children, /?. 187, 7th Cafe, Excommunication is no criminal DetraAion* 8th Cafe, Magiftrates may be acquamted with the Brea- kers of their Laws, ^. t88. 9th Cafe, One may fpealc ill of a fal e Religion, f?, 190^ loth Cafe, It is lawful to vindicate one's fclf, tho' another Perfon's Character fuffers by it, f, 192. nth Cafe^ What mull be done, when of two Perfons we mull fpcak ill of one, f. 198. iith Cafe^ Concerning Satyrs, When they are lawful,^, 199. 13th Cafe, One Ihould not mention thofe Vices that Sinners do glory in, f, 2C0; 14th Cafe, A Pcrloo ihould not Ipeak ill of himfclf, f. 201. 15th Cafe, One fhould not mention a Man's bad Quali'ies after he hath mennoncd his good Ones, f. 203. i5th Cafe, We may and ought to mention Men^s Faults, when we cannot avoid it without telling Lyes^^^ 204. 17th Cafe, What mufl be done, when in order to clear one Man we are obliged to accufc another, /». 204. i8th Cale, The viJe- iiQk and meannefs of a Pcrfon is no Exxufe to fpcak III of him or her, p, 204. 19th Cafe, Neither the Igno- rance of Right nor the ignorance of Fa6l excules a De- tratftor, f. zq6. 20th Cafe, We muit not reveal Secrets, p, 20g. The Ufcs of this Sec^lion, p. 2rr. SECT. Vllf. Objecflions made in favour of Detra^^ion anfwered, p. nr. ill Objsclion, Derra6lion may fcrvc to make People re- form, ^. 112. 2d Obj. If we do not detract when others do, wc lliall get an ill Name, p, i j 5. 3d Obj. We muft conform to Culloin, p. 219. 4th Obj. If we donotdc- trad, we IhsU hardly have any thing to talk of, p. 222, 5th Obj. Wc fhallljfe, ifwcdo not dctrad^ the Com- pany Yi The CONTENT S. pany and Fricndfhip of many PerfonS;, p. 214; . 22^. 8th Obj. It is well known to every Body that no Perfon is free from Infirmi- ties, p. xi6.. 9th Obj. It is lawful and a Duty to tell the Truth,^.227. icth Obj. It is fometimcs for the publick Good to detraft, p, 228. nth Obj, Why Jhould not People talk of Faults that are known to every Body, p. 2^,1. 1 2th Obj. Charity is not blind, p. 2;2. ruh Obj. One cannot help to utter a fine witty ExprefHon, when it comes to mind, ^, 253. Obj, 14th, Some lerfons arc fo very bad and malicious, that they do not defervc to befpared and pityed, f. 237. The Ufes of this Sedion, ^p. 159. SECT. IX. Motives to avoid this Sin : ift Motive, The badnefs of the Sources that produce it,;?. 242. 2d Motive, Detradlors are confcious, that they are Sinners thcmfelves, f. 24;. 3d Motive, A.11 Men fliould lovc one another as Brethren, f. 248. 4th Motive, It is an cafy thing to abftain from evil (peaking, 249. 5th Motive, To abftain from it will picfcrve our Reputation,/?. 25c. 6th Motive, It will gain us the cfteem and good Will of People, f. 252. 7th Motive,By evil fpeaking we render our fclves inexcufablc, f. 253. 8th Motive, Our Tongue is defiled by evil-Ipea- king, f. 254. 9th Motive, Some Circumflanccs concern- ing Perfons and their Faults,/?. 255. loth Motivc,Thc very greatDamage done to our Neighbcur,by our fpeak- ing againfthim,/?. 251. nth Motive. Great many Cir- cumf^anccs often Icflen his Faults, f\ k-;. 12th Motive, Our abftaining fromDetra(fl:ion will make r,OD favoura- ble to us, f. 258. 13th Motive, If we refrain from de- tric'ling we may alfo from a great many ether \ ices, f\ z6o. 14'h Motive, Examples and Condud of eminent and godly Pciions, f: 262. The Ufcs of this Seftion, f. 16^. S E C '/. X. Containing many Duties and Counfcls concerning Dctra^li- on. f. 16 -J. Article I. Duties and Counfcls to thofc who dcfirc to avoid De traftion, f. 26;* ^rrid The CONrENr& vii -Article 2. The Duties of thofe who arc fallen into Dctradioiij f .275; jirticle 3. The Duty of thole in prcfence of whom People have dc- tra6\ed^ p, 277. Jrtkle 4.' The Duties of thofe who are fpoken ill of. p, a88.* The Ufes of this Sedion, f. 298. The Conclufion of this Trcatife. ERRATA. PAge 1 line 12 put a full Stop after the Word, art, and nofte after, p. 6 1.6 read, rather than Detradlion. p.i6 1. Ii, read, any thing. p, i7 laftl. read, but a Thoufand p. 37 L 9 read heard. 1. i§ read by them p. 49 After Eighth Source re^d Levity & Caprice, p. ^i inftead of Fourteenth Source, read Fifteenth Source p 7o J. 29 r«ad but altho'. p. 76 h 11 read but thinlcTshat. p. 81 1. ij read one of thePIeafuies of Life- 1. 18 read by deftroying the good Opinion Peo- ple had of them before they heard of thofe Fanlf, which however are often iafeparabie from human Nature, p-84 \.z read advance.p.91 J. 17 read faithful, p. 97 i. 6 read his. p. loo J. z read all the thiiiki ing part of Mankind, p 114 read Article XIII . 1. a read oner near his Table, p 1^4 1 a6 read hurt. P158 read afford moft Men. ] g read inftead of flill farther, read and nothing^ &Ci p 168 I 4 inllead of wherel>y, read and. 1 1^ read The Rulers ot aScate^ inllead of^Tiie Princes of a Kingdom, p 171 I 16 read expeifl inftcad of pretend,p.i7S 2 i^read finful againllGOD.p 1183 1 24 forSmoik readVapour.p i^^ \z6 read thofe ,inftcad cf thefe. p 201 \6 read fuch a Maii, 1 11 read him for his. p io7 1 ^^ read but yet I fay, inftead of, to this 1 aafwer^: 1 24 read fome Attention, p ao^ read, impofRble to me, &c. p 210 1,2 read fometimes inftead of generally, & fome inftead of very. p zjo 1 29 read fort of Criminals. P265 1 ly read and even without De- tradious. 1 14 read th»fe inftead of thefe. P278 1 24 [read Meflias inftead of Miferies 1 take often in this Treatife the Word; Self-Love, for that which finfu/, though Self Love in it fclf fce. innocent and natural. aS^SJvJ5O^9OO?J0®«^OO^OO<5©©OS<5^^ 1 Mult deft re the Reader to excufe fame Phrafes * that may be tmproper or objcure, yls this fVork was firfi compofed tn the French Lan^ guage^ and the "tranjlathn is kept "very clofe to the French, the turn and genius of which dif- fers conftder ably from the Englilb, from thence 'proceed that improperty or obfcurity perhaps in few of the Sentences, /is to the H'ork tt /elf Some People will perhaps blame me for bei/ig too particular^ and mentioning trifling Things ; but I muft beg oj them to conftder that to write Treat ifes of Morality in O' general way onl)\ and to write nothings is almoji the fame 7hing, If zve pretend to convince and conrert Men, we mu/i do it by entring as it were into their "Very Hearty and making them jenjible of all their Miftakcs ^ and O'S they are wry viri-^ cus^ and numerous in order to examine andcon^ futethem^ we a? e obliged to be very particular^ as I have been in this fVoi% tW I hpf nop tQ a Fault, ^v^OSiO^-3^-;>?««i©C«^S^pa'S^-^^#^«^i^ TREATISE A G A 1 HI V DETRACTION. ^-e« ^-65 ^^ ^ ^-e^ ^ ^ s&"9« >& -e^ >& a^ &a» s E a f J O N u ARTIC LE £ Detraftion is definel '\HE Heart is deceitful^^^"^- ^ above all things^ and"^"^"^^ defperately wkkedy "who can know it f faith the c^ap. 17; Vxo^httjeremiak Pauh^^*^- tells us aifo that no w^^icar.i.i^ knoweth the things of a man/ave thefpirit of man which ts m himi So that that Heart which hardly know- cth it felf would be quite uniearghable to a A freatifc agalnfi Sect, I. other Hearts, if it did not difcovet it's "'^'^'^^^ Paflioiis, it's Sentiments and Dcfigns to others. This he doci very often by liis Match, u detracting Words : Out of the abti?ida?ice 3*' of tbeHearty the iVIouthJpcaheth. There- lore when you hear any one fpeaking a- gainft his Neighbour, it is not a hard mat- ter toguefs how he ft ands affected towards him. And as detracting Speeches arc very- common in the Mouth of Men, it is both the moft ulual K nroll furc way to knoWt what their Thoughts are for. DctraHton, as we underftand and ufe that Word iu this Book, is a Sin which confifts in tcl'ing to one^ or federal Pcr^ fons^ ^ithoit jScceJJit)\ true "things "which hurt the good Name ej ourNcigh- hours ^ whatever Means and Ways may be ufed to accomplifh tJiat. I fay, in tk firjt Place, that tliis Sin confifts in rehting things that are truCy and are hurtful to our Neighbours^ in order to diftinguifti it from Calumny^ which confifts in inventing and telling of and againjt them^ things ,that are falfe. Some liavc called the t)etradion that we Ipeafc of, Uncharitable truths whereas Slanders and Calumnies are an" charitable Untruths. The Words un- cliaritablc Truth, do exprefs fo well the Nature of DetraLlion, that we may lay, that the very Name is tl)c Definition of ths t) E "t R AC T t O N. ^ the Thing defined, nothing being more Sect. li contrary to Charity than Detraftion. ^•V"^^ I fay, in \h^ feco?idY\^c^^ that it doth hot only confift in telling or fpeaking Things hurtful to the Charader of our Neighbours, bccaufej tho' the Wo ids £1;//- f^edking^ properly have a Relation to Words and Difcourfes only, yet it is cer- tain, that we muft comprehend under the Idea or Notion of Back-biting, every Thing that may have the fame EfTeft as Difcourfes, 'viz. To hnrt^ his good Name. We intiend to explain this Definition more at large afterwards * but in the mean while, it is neceflfary to obferve here, that it may happen that the mentioning of certain Aftions may fomctimes be fin- ful, whenfaid of certain Perfons, whereas it may be innocent if faid of others, be- caufe thefe Aftions may be good or badjj according to the leveral Circumftances of Perfons or Places or Times, by whom, o: in which they have been done. For In- Itance, It would be an uncharitable Truth, and confequently a Sin, to fay that flich a Mujjulman or Ttirk^ as we call tbofe that follow the falfeDoftrine of/J/^fo;^^/^, hath drank fome Wine, becaule the Law of that falfe Prophet forbids it ; whereas on the contrary, it is not a Detradion, if fpeakipg gf a Chijiian^ you fay that he j^ A Treatifc againjt Sect. I. hath drank Wine modcrately,becaufc every •^"'^^^^ Body knows that thcGolpel doth not for- bid the Ulc, but the Excels of that Li- quor • fo tlvat it hurts not the Character of this,but only the Character of the Ma^ hometan^lo fay that he hath drank Wine, tho' moderately : As alfo ii is an uncha- ritable Truth to fay of a Roman Catho* Ikky that he never goes to Mafs • where- as it would be uncharitable to lay of a Protejiant^ that he ever goes or went to Mafs'^ bccaufe the one by his Principles is obliged to go, and the other by contrary Principles, is bound not to go to Mafs. ARTICLE //. Why many Perfons often confound De- tradion and Calumny ? IN the foregoing Article we have en- deavoured to fhew the difference there IS between Detra^'ton SC Calumny. Ne- verthclels it is very ufual to lee not only the comiuon People, but even thole who think theinfelves far above them, join or confound thcie two together very unjuft- ly. I believe the Reafon hereof may be gathered from the two following Confide- rations, which it may be proper to men- tion. D EfR AC 7" 10 N. 5 tion, thatfo when we know from whence Sect. I- the Error arifes, we may the more eafiiy ^-'^V>^ guard againft both it and its Confequences. , 1. The firft Reafon is, That in mofi of the dead and Vroing Languages^ the fame T'erms n)ery frequently fign'tfy both the one and the other ofthefe Sins : And to mention the Language in which I am wri- ting, the word DetraBion fignifies as well Calumny as fimple Back-biting. The Terms being fo near alike, we are apt to Ipeak in the very fame manner of things quite different. 2. A fecond Reafon is, becaufe /^^ /f^i^ Scripure it felf feems to confound them together^ in many Places too long here to be mentioned. The Reafon now alledged may be one of the Caufes hereof; to which I may joyn the following ones, and illuf- trate them by an Example, even that of the holy Apoftle James, He oppofes thefetwoSins in feveralPlaces of hisEpiftle by the very fame Arguments. (i)Becaufe they are equally theFruitsof a deadFaitb. (2) Becaufe they arc equally committed by the fame mean of the Tongue. (3) Becaufe they arc both contrary toCharity. And (4) Becaufe theirEffccls are very neai the fame. Upon thefc Accounts we arc very apt to confound them together. Allowing my felf this Liberty, I fnall make ufe of thofe Texts which may be c- B 3 quail y A freattfc agatnji SECf. I. qually allccjgcd againft Calumny and De- traction • yet for fear of confounding two matters, which arc as oppofitc as Truth and Fa)ftty\ I fhall let alone thofe where I think the facrcd Authors had Calumny in Y\t\\fX2iX\\ciDetra!;iion^ or w^hich might puzzle and perpkx the Reader's Mind. Neverthflcfs it muft be obferved, that what we fhall fay againft Detraclion, will fo much the niore condemn Calumny, in- afmuch as this latt is a Lye^ and confe- quently a Sin added to the iirft, being thus a Degree of Malice above it. ARTICLE ///. Flattery is oppofed to Detratlion. ON E of the moft proper ways to know theNaturc of a thing is to oppofe it to what is contrary thereto. In natural things we find out the Levity of one Body by the Oppofition it has to the Gnrcity of anothcr.In Morality the way to know the Weight of a Sin is the very fame. Thus we hope to ilhiftrate our Subjcft, by fhcw- ing how Detraction is oppofed to another Vice, at the fame Time that we are pro- ving how it is oppofed to the Ho- linefs and the Laws of G O D, to which all Sins are directly contrary. You will hereby at Icaft obferyc, that in order to acquire acquire one fingle Virtue a Man muft of- Sect. L ten ftiun more then one Vice: Befides that ''•^VV, in order to know wtiether he be in a jail Medium, wherein a recommended Virtue ordinarily confifts, he mult diligently oh- ferve the two Extremities and lay ihem together to find the Center. Flattery is oppofed to DetraBhn^znd both to Charity^ which is the happy Medium betwixt them. Thefe two Vices have oppoGte Views, inafmuch as Detraftion is a 'fruth which vexes our Neigfibours, and tends to trou- ble them, whereas Flattery is generally a Lye invented to pleafe them. The one deftroys by Sword^ the other by Poifon : Both are contrary to Charity^ which for- bids us to Ipcak ill of others, thereby to defame them, and contrarywife to flatter them, thereby to engage them to go on in their vicious ways, and hinder them from becoming virtuous, by making tl' a be- lieve they are fo already. It is evident that Charity holds a middle betwixt thefc two things, which neverthelefs have this in Common, that they are made uie of for the very fame Ends, on certain Occafions, Sometimes we Back-bite Perfons in order to raife our felves above them ; at other times we Flatter Perfons, fo that by the return of a Flattering Complement, they may lift us above other Men. Thas/^//- B 4 I'rco A freatife againft SiCT. L love wou'd be applauded by ways entirely different. ARTICLE IK Of the Objea ^/Detraftion. AS on the one hand, all the World is capable of Detraction, fo on the other, the Ol^je^oi Dctraftion is very univerfal; becaule we may fpeak evil of all McHj Tione being fauUleis. Among all the Sins whereby we can injure our Neighbours, there Is none which may be extended fo far or to fo great a number of Objects as Detraction. When for inltance, Children break the Command which enjoins them to honour their Parents, they nn only a- gainft two Perfons. When a Perfon is addicted to Theft, he has neither Power nor Opportunity fufRcient to hurt a great many Perfons, and generally an ignomini- ous Death puts an End to his evilDeligns. The fame may be faid of Murder. But Detraction not being punifh'd by the Ma- giftrate, and Power, Opportunity and hu- mane Faults being never wanting toBack- biters, it follows, that all the frorld af- fords a Mark for Detraction. There DEtRACT'lON. $ There are none but thofe who dwell in Sect. J. Heavenly Manfions, of whom it is impof- fible to fpeak ill, bccaufe they are pert'c^.l- ly holy. This is what the Scripture af- fures us with refpeft to G O D in a great many Places. He is ofprer Eyes than jiab.1.13, fo behold Evil^ far from committing it. J own, there are Perfons Wicked, or ra- ther Mad enough, to find fault with the Divine Conduct, and to fay as the Jews in EzehieJ, the ways of th^ Lord are not vm?z$|'' Equal. But what do they then fay ? They pronounce anhorriblc^/^/?^/^ and not a Detradion. Thofe are, thefe un- happy pnes who know not GO Dy and fpeak Evil of what they underjland not. J^^^* ^^'^ As for Angels and the Spirits of juft Men hc|3.u.ij, made perfect, the Scripture makes their continual Employment and perfcft Feli- city to confift, in an exad Obedience to the Orders of the Lord ; thus they live exempt from all thofe Faults which arc blamed in the Inhabitants of the Earth, J'he Ufes of this SeBion. Altho' vve have not as yet fully proved, that the Vice we are difputing againftisa Sin, yet as we have already ihewn, that it is contrary to Charity, this gives us fuffi- cient Reafon to warn and exhort you to forfake it. What we haye already faid of its lo A Treat ife againft Sect. I. its Nature may ferve for this,thatit flioulj ^^'^^^"^^ make us forfake it. If any have formerly committcdit without knowingit, let them now know it without committing it. Let thofc who before knew what it was, at length ceafc finning againft their Light,and let what wc have laid,bc as aClap otTiiun- der to awaken them from their Drowfi- nels. Let the one and the other fully and entirely quit this Sin. In moft Subjccls of Morality, Virtue confillsin a Medium, but in Vice this Medium is dangerous. Virtue is found in an extremity beyond the very bounds of Vice. So that if you fuppofe a Man, who very often Detracts, another who does it but feldom, and a third, who never does, this laft alone fhall t\ik.loUi*h2Lye cho/en the good Part, I fay this, becaufc there are many who look upon themielves as very wife H, moderate Pcr- fons, when they tell only part of what they know againft their Neighbours, in which they are very much miftakcn. Since Flattery is as far from Charity, as Charity is from Detraction, let us avoid both Crimes with the fame Care. Truly what matter is it to tlic Devil, whether wc perilh by Fire or Water, fo that wc do but Pcrilli. For this Reafon it was that he fomctimes caft the Lunatick men- Mattih i^'tioi^cd in thcGofpcljinto oneElemcnt,and fomctimes into the other. If we will not Back- D E^ R AC n O N. II Back-bite Perfons for fear of offending Sect. L them, no more ought we to give themun- ^*'''V^^i due PraifeSj left if they bemodeft, it grieve them, or if they are not, it make them the prouder. In a Word, as wc may flatter or blame all Mankind, let us fee to it, that we act not after this manner with regard to any one. SECTION II. In how many ways they Detraft, 1^0 The diver Jity ofthefe ways almoji infinite. WWW^^ ¥W H E R E are almoft as many o . „ -^^^^-'30 ^g ways of Detracting, as there ^^' Tiyg are Detradors ; every one 5^~a^ differently expreffing hisDe- ^;feJ&^oJS„i, tractions according to his own Genius and turn of Mind. And on the other fide, thefe ways arc ft ill various according the different and nume- rous Failings of the Perfons talked of ; fo that I don't believe//?^ whole fVorldcou'd (^ontcin the Booh which might he writ- ^'^^^''-^'2^' ten 12 A freatife again fi 5ect.II. ten on this Sabjed. This is a great deal, ^*^^>rs0f but not too much, to lay thereof, fince a good part of the Difcourfes of our Ancef- tors, and of own, has been and is but De- traftion differently modified. I (hall not therefore here pretend to re- late all the ways that are cuftomarily made afe of to blame our Neighbours : This would be impofliblc : Moreover, the Pradice of the World, and the Study of your own Heart, may fupply what we fhall omit. Only we muft obfervc to you, that the moft witty Methods arc the mod dangerous. It feems we fwallow a Pill when gilded with lefs Reludancy, and we take more Pleafure in divulging a Detrac- tion, when we think there is Wit in it ; whether it be to fhew that we have feme ourfelves, or to pleale thofe in whofe pre- fencc we Dctrad by diverting them • yea, fo far is thisMethod carried, that there arc thofe, who adding Lying to DctraHion^ ^ ^uilmpudcncc to thefc two Sins,fainy call themfelves the Authors of ibme fliarp and keen Exprcflion. That this Scdion may be treated with all polTible Order, wc fhall here confider three principal things. The Manner in which wc Dctrad has regard (i) To the Stibje^ and Matter of Dctradion. (:i)To xhzCircumJlances. And (3) To xhcMcans tkemjehes made ufe of. A R^ DETRACTION. 13 Sect. IL ARTICLE /. Of the Subjed of Detraflion. T N what way foever we confider Man^ ^ wc fhall always meet with a Subjeft of Detraftionjandfomething to find fault with in him. If he be in Profperity, he then forgets GOD. If in Adverfiity, he for- gets himfelf,and falls intoMurmuring. The Rich Man we fee proud, the poor Man impatient ; the young Man is debauched and hafty ; the Old Man coveteous and peevifti. Sicknefs SC Health, Liberty and Slavery are equally abus'd by Man. Whe- ther we look upon him in a ftate of Ac- tion or in a ftate freefromAftion, we Ihall ftill find him aSinner. La2inefs,Sluggifti- nefs and Idlenefs are Vices • and his Ani- ons may be, and often are great Sins. Who doubts hereof ? Who does not fee it ? Confider him according to the various ftates wherein he paflcs his Life, and you will fee him a conceited Clergyman, a mercenary Warrior, an unjuft Judge, aDe- ceitfull Merchant. What might we not further fay of him, were we fo minded ? But however we will fay no more, and ac- knowledge, that there are many Perlbns free from the Blemilhes common to the various 14 -ot DEfR^CriON. tj not aVice, yet there are Occafions wherein Sect. II. it wou'd greatly,to fay that he "was Poor. v^vx>. Charity requires, that at fuch a time we ihou'd lay nothing at all of his Eftate. ARTICLE //. Of the Manner of DetraB'ton as t9 it's Circumftances. I. np* H E firft of thefe Circumftances j^ is, That we utter fome things whicii we know of our felves, and other Things which we know only by the Tefti- mony and Report of other Men. I did not fee, fays a Man, the Thing with my own Eyes ^ but you need not doubt of it a whit the more for that. This Account comes to me from agoodHand,and a Per- fon that I would truft as foon as my felf. 2. We may detiaftfromPerfons in their Prefence^ either when we addrefi our felves to them, ( aad this is ftiled reviling a Man to his Face, ) or when we fpeafc of them in addreffing our felves to others. 3. In their Ahfence we may back-bite Perfons ; and this is the moft common and ordinary way : Whether it be, that we are afraid, that thofe to whom and of wh^im we are fpeaking, will make feme cutting 1 8 A freatife againjl Sect. IT. cutting Anfwcr, and with violence call ^"^^C^ back the Arrows fhot againfl them, on the Shooters : Or,Bccaufe w^c confider that good Manners won't allow us to vex a whole Company with mutual Jarrs. Per- haps Cowardice may hinder ibme from tel- ling Perlbns of their Faults to their Face, or fome other peculiar Reafons. 4, Men may detraft publicUy and without referve. Thus hafty and giddy- headed Perfons a£V, who tell every one all that they know\ 'Tis all one to them, w ho they talk to, neither do they care whether the Perfon, whofe Reputation they wou*d blaft, be known or unknown to them. 5. On the ether hand, Men may de- trad in appearance vnoxQ fe ere tl)\ tho' in the end more publlckly. I tell yen this, ( fays one Man to another ) becaufe you are my Friend ^ but I fhould be very forry that any Body fhould know this Story came from me. I tell it to you as a/^rr^/, and beg you'd not div:ilgc it. But how- ever, if you fhould happen to mention it, don't bring me for your Author, for you will certainly meet with the Diflippoint- nient of feeing me deny, that I ever told you any fuch Thing. It muft be owned, that this is but 2 Trick to fpread News the further • ly- eiiufe, Ag we communicate the Secret by way DEtRACflON. I (^ way cf Favour, he who hears it, thinks Sect. IL to do as great a Favour to others, whom he acquaints with it, and to gain their Confidence and Friendlhip. Thefe lat- ter have the fame Views with the former j and after this manner every one befriends his Neighbour, till the Thing is wholly publick. Moreover, How can any one imagine, that another will keep a Secret, which he himlelf could not help difcover- ing? 6. We may detraft by relating Things which concern thofe to whom we relate them. (ThefeMen are called 'tale-bearers,) Or when we tell Things to thole who have no Concern in them. 7. We may detraft diredly, openJy and by calling Things, as we fay, by their Name. Many even call this Freedom : But we muft confels that this is fo far from being a Virtue, that on the contrary it is a very great Sin. This is to abufe Words y that fo afterwards v/e may abufe Ihings. Let us then be more rcferved, when wc treat of our Neighbour's Reputation. 8. We may detrad indire5ily and oh-^ liquely -As, (i.) By Equivocations,either in Words, or in the Senfe of a Phrafe. It would be needlels to flop here, in order to over-throw theCaufe of Equivocations in Words, which are feldom ufed, but among the Rabble. It is to be wilh'd C % that 10 j4 freatife againU Sect. 11. that DctracliTi it fe If were as much con- ^^^^^^^ dcnin'd by the World, as this way of de- tracting, (a.) \Vc may covertly ipeak HI of a Pcrlon i.iidcr the dilguilc of Fables and Parables. Thus Jotbam compar'd jiK'-ecb. y^l^i^^^^^^'-l^ t:o a Bramble^ and applied it's 9- ° Qualities to him. (j.) Wc may back-bite a Perlon indircftly, when wc Tpeak evil in general of thole, with whom he has any thing in common. For Example, If Nve lay, ttiat all the Officers in Inch aRc- gimcnt performed their Duty very ill, wc do certainly back-bite every one in paiti- cular, for he that Ipeaks Evil of all,excepts none. And yet this is done indiredly, no one being expreffiy named. «£ ?^ 'if ^> ^^W^^ Vf'^i Wii !^«l \^^l ^'^ !^ ARTICLE ///. Cf the Means niade Vje of in DetraBion* TH E remainder of this Seftion Ihall be employed in particularizing the various Means made ufc of for Detraction. I. We may derracl in a large ami gene- ral way, by laying. That the Perfon wc are talking of, has a very ill Charadcr a- broad • that he is fubjcc^ to a great many Vices; without mentioning lb much as one in particular. 1. Wc DETRACtlON. 1. We may detraft in many Words, or in one fingle Word. Such a Man fay we, is an Ufurer, Infamous, a Glutton, £f^. Now this one Word, makes as much or more impreffionon the Hearers, as if ^\e drew a Pifture of his evil Life at length. Befides that, Detradors of this fort, are very eafily urged to enter into a detail of the Ufuries, Infamies and Gluttonies, which they mentioned in one fingle Word. 3. When we will not name the Crime of the Pcrfon we talk of, but leave the Hearer to guefs what it is, under pretence, that Charity obliges us to hide the grcat- nefs of the Crime j fo that by this exprcl- five Silence others often efteem it greater than it really is. O Diabolical Charity ! 4. When we don't name the Perfon j but fay, it is one, whom you know very well, hasdone fuch and fuch Things : BaC as we know many capable of having done them, we thereupon fufpect a great Num- ber, which is fo much the more dangerous, as this Difcourfe affords room for various ra(h Judgments in the Mind oft'ie Hearer, and as this Detradion comprehends many Objeds at once. Add to all this, that thofe who hear us fpeak thus, fuiFer them- felves to be eafily perfvvaied, thinkin;^ that it is thro* Love or Compa Tiop, that wc conce4 the Name of the Evil^D^er. G 3 BuQ 21 Sect. II. 22 j4 Treatifs againjt SECT.II.But as Solomon ^3iysy fhe tender Mercies ^^f"^''^^^^ of the H'tckei are cruel, J. Une way or Detraction is to jeer, expofe and ridicule any one before a Com- pany. Without this, lay fome, Convcr- lation wou'd languilh, and we ought to keep that up at any rate whatever. But what is the Confequence of this ? Many Times, two of the Company are thcAftors in the Scene, and the reft are Spedators. He who is not the beft, but w^ho has the moft fprightly Wit, falls upon him whom he judges the weakeft among 'cm. He en- deavours to puzzle him in his Anfwers ; to make him either quite filent, or fall in- to a Paflion, by burlefque & cutting Com- parifons, and render him the Jeft of the whole Company. Thus it becomes a kind of Tragi-Comedy, where ibme are merry, others lad. Sometimes all the Spe6tators become Aftors ^ which is i^o much the more lamentable, as there are then no Me- diators to pacify the Troubles. 6. It is a kind of Detraction to make Perfons pubhckly confefs their Faults, by demanding of them, whether they did not do fuch and fuch an evil Adion. I own there are but very few who have finccrity enough lO own they were guilty of it • but then we arc the Occafion of their ly- ing. 7. We DETRACTION. ^3 7. We detrad when we give Reproofs Sect. II. and Exhortations, which may difcover to ^^^"^"^"^ thofe prefent, that he whom we talk to, has need of them, with reference to his paft evil Condud. This is far from the Advice given us in the 30th Chap, of Pro- ver. i«. verbSy Accufe not a Servant before his Majterj led he curfe thee and thou he found guilty. We may extend this Pre- cept ftill further, and apply it to all thofe who give their Reproofs, in Prelence of thofe who ought not to affifl therein. I here except the Men who give their Re- proofs in the Pulpit, i. Becaufe they re- prove only when they think there is a ne- ceflity therefor. a.Becaufe that fince they fpeak in general, we can't fay they aim'd at fome particular Perfons. 3. Suppofe they do fpeak againfl fome Vice, which many of their Hearers know others fubjeft tOjthey then tell them nothing new. 4.The Prophets, our Lord JESUS CHRIST and his Apoflles, have approved of thcfe forts of Cenfures, by their own Praftice. What I find very intolerable and foolifh in fome Perfons is, to detrad by exhorting and counfelling others not to do fo. Don't you detract ( fay ihefe Men to others ) as fuch an one has done,and thereby brought himfelf into troublefome Affairs. 8. Anathemas are ever Detradlioiis, tho' not always Sins, being permitted to C 4 the 2/f. A Treattfe againfi Sect. II. the Guides of the Churches to be fbme- "^^-"^^^ times ullJ, after the Example of the holy Apoftlcs. This may be further enquired into in one of the Sections ot this Trca- tifc. 9. We fall into Detradions by Reproa- ches and publick InveftivesagainftPerfons. 1 call them publick when they are ufcd in preferce of many Perfons, and efpecially of thofe that are not concerned in the fub- jcd of the Difpute. This way of Detrac- tion is terrible : We name Perfons and Things : We Ipare nothing : We Ihew no Favour: The moft filthy Terms, the moft oifcnfive Words are made ufe of : The moft fecret Actions are laid open : The oldeft Crimes arc anew raked up. Then Proba- bilities and rafli Judgments pafs for Truths and Realities. Some will perhaps fay, That I aggra- vate every where, and lb am not to be credited, feeing I have in anothet Place laid. That private Ways are alfo extreme dangerous. But t[iis Reafoning, inftcad of making againlt me, makes directly againft Detrac- tion, to which I am very oppolite. And from u liat I have laid, we may conclude, that both thcie ways are truly very dan- gerous, very teriible, and ccnlequcntly to be avoided. It is not luflicient not to practice l(;me of thcfe ways ; we muft a- bandou them all. 10. DETRACT'ION. ^s 10. Curjing is detracting. To detraft Sect.II. and to curie may be exprei'sM in Latin by ^-'^^'^^ the fame Word • and in French there is a confiderable liktnefs between the fignifi- cation of thefe two Terms, as well as be- » twecn the Terms themfelves. When Shi- x Smi. u, met curled Dav'tdy by calling him a bloody ^' 7. Man^ did he not fpeak ill of that Prince? Does not a partofCurfes confift in wifli- ing, that the EviJ, which thefe we com- plain of, have done to us or others, may- fall upon them- that fo they may be pu- nilhed therewith ? Do we Curfe thofc whom we believe honeft and virtuous ? The fame may be faid of Imprecations. 11. We detract by raifing evil Sufpici- ons of the Manners of any one, after what way focver it be. For Example, with reference to thofe whom a Man converfes with ; as in faying, he is very familiar with Mr. N -who is exceedingly debauched. This makes a great Impreffion, inafmuch as we are not ignorant, that evil Compa- ny may corrupt, and that corrupt Perfons feek fuch Company. And this fort of detraction at the fame time gives an evil fufpicion of the one, and flily fpeaks a- ^ gainft the other, 12. By alluding to fomcthing trifling, infipid or wicked, which any one has faid, whereof we make a kind of Proverb, which by thefe means foon gets along into the World, 26 A freatife againji Sect.IL World, where we m^ay obferve many of ^-^"^^^ this Nature. 13. By any way mimicking the dcfefts of another whatever they bc^ ashisGrima- ^ CCS, Hypocrify, ^c. 14. Many Times an Irony is made ufc of to detracl, and to exprefs oar detvadions. This Irony confifts in faying Truths by contraries. Thus we call a Man knavifh, by faying, that he is the moft honeft Man alive. So we call aMan talkative, by faying, that he hardly ever Ipeaks. 15. We may detrad by Geftures and Poftures. For Inftance a Wink of theEyc, ( which in a Man is almoft as cxprefiive as Words,) on a Perfon, fhall fhew whom Vfc are talking of under a borrowed Name. The Hands may ferve for the fame Ends j and hence it is, that the Ancients juftly gave them the Epithet of talkative : Whether they fpeak alone, or whether they accompany what the Mouth utters. A Shrug of the Shoulders may fhow, that we are afhamcd of what a Perfon fiys,that wc pity him and defpifc him. It follows then that a dumb Man may dctracl by his Geftures, as well as another by hisTongue, Writing, Painting and Signs in general whether natural or artificial, may alfo fcrvc to difcovcr the Sins and Vices of our Neighbours, ARTICLE DET'RJCriON. 27 ARTICLE/^ Some other W^ays of detraHing. Moreover there are fome ways of de- tradion, which are not foeafily per- ceived as thole we have already related, which notwithftanding are fatal Scandals and forbidden Turns. Of thcfe we fliall fay fomething, I. It very often happens, that Compa- rilons in certain Circumftances, are kind of Detradion. Suppofc two Perfons exadly alike ; If we fay, the one is moreReligious than the other, hereby we accufe the lat- ter of Irreligion, or at leaft of not having made that progrefs in Piety, that he might and ought to have made. Let us fuppofe two others, one whereof is become a de- vout and good Chriftian, with very little help, the other with confiderable affiftance comes far fliort of him ^ while we commend the former, and exalt him above his Fel-^ low ^ do we not tacitly accufe the latter of having made an ill ufe of GOD's Grace f' Saul knew this very well, ^ken hejhow'd his dijlike to the Daughters of Ifrael, i Sam. is, "Who in their Songs had given David the ^* glory of having Jlain fen Thoufand Phi-- li/iines^ while to him they allowed the honour of defeating butfhoufands ofthofi very Enemies. 2, V/h-n ^8 ^4 freatife againji Sect. II. 1, When we favour Detractors, and flir ^--^"^r^ thcni up to back-bite, then wc may be accounted partakers in Detraftion. This may be done feveral ways, as (i) We en- courage Detradtors by an afFedted Silence, whence they fancy, that we acquiefce in all they fay againlt the honour of others, and take our filence for Confcnt. Who docs not fee that this is to be a Favourer of th's Sin, and confequently a Detractor .• That cauied 6'. Ambrofe to fay, that Death enters at the fVtrjdout^s of the Ear ^ "when you acrjuiefce in and give yourCon- Jent to him that freaks. (2) We encou- rage Perfons to detrad, when we admire the Wit of thofe, who have fliewn an un- common Craltinefs in certain Sallies againlt their Neighbours ; or when we applaud any one, that has wittily llandcr'd in our Prefence : a thing too common in this impious and fawning Age ! (3) We dc- traCt,whcn we give way to Detraction by any Storys ot'this Nature, which afford an Opportunity to others to finifh what was but begun, and to go on, after they are put in the way. In tine, we furnilh Oc- cafionsfor Dctraction,for which wc are ac- countable, if we fix the Converfation upon Perfons, of whom we know that fome in the Company can't hear us talk without detracting from them, on account of lomc real or imaginary Caufe of diffatisfaction agiiull DET'RACTION. ^9 againft them. All thefe ways of making Sect. IL others detradl-, and encouraging them there- ^^^^^'^^ in, are fo many Sins. 51 Paul is exprels on this Point in his Epiftle to the Romans. He looks upon it not only as a Crime but even as a double Crime, to favour it, when he fays of the Heathen, that^ not content K^m.i.^u to commit thofe Sins^ for wh/cb Isamre might reprove them^ they had Pleajure in thofe who did thejame. Indeed, this is to'take Vice under our Protedion ; this Ihews, that fince we don*t condemn it in others, we our felves are ready to commit it every time an Occafion ihall prefent, and that we do not lin by Surprize, but with a Defire which we have had a long Time before thus to applaud Sinners, Which undoubtedly aggravates the Fault. 3. We do in fome meaf jre detrad when we diminifli the fine Qualities of any one, at what time another is fpeaking advanta- geoufly thereof. When, inftcad of affift- ing to fliew them in all their Luftre, and to give glorious Anions all their duePraife, thereby to induce others to the like Prac- tice, we endeavour to tarnilh and obfcurc them, by all ways and methods. Such a Man fay we, did good becaufe he was in no way to do evil, or elic he had his own Intereft in view. It was his Paffion that guided him, and Love of vain-glory that engaged him therein, or elfe hv aid it with- out 30 A freatife agatnfi Sect. ir. out any dcfign of doing good. The good ^'^'^>i^^ which he has done, fay we, is very im- pcrfcft ; he might have done much more and much better, thus high to value his Actions, is doing him too much Honour. Still further to lelfen thePraife ofa good Adion,wx endeavour to diminilh the cer- tainty thereof. The thing, fay we is not lo certain, but that it w^antsConfirmation^ perhaps they who publifli it, were not rightly inform^ ; it is rather too loon to give credit to fach News. Happy turn when Charitably ufed ! 4. We do fomething like Detradlion, when we will not fpeak of any ones Ver- tues upon Occafions that naturally prcfcnt and when it w^ou'd bejull fo to do. It is not enough, that we refrain from hurting- we muft alfo do good, thereby imitating our great Pattern the Lord Jefus Chrift, who promifcd the Woman that poured the Box Mattb. ir. of precious Ointment on him, tkat^jobcrc- ^^' ever bis Gofpel Jhould he Preached^ to her honour Jhould be mentioned "vohat jhe had done unto him. Doubtlels a Prince would look upon it as a great Injury ihou'd we rob him of any of his Titles, or beflow tiiem on others. The thing is the very iame as to particular Perfons. 5. To be lejoiccd at hearing Dctraclion, to wilh that any one would dctiad^, to be very eafy when it fo falls cut, is a Sin a- gainit DETRACTION. 31 gainft the Love we owe thePerfon detrac- Sect. 11. ting and detracted. Hereby we participate ^-/V*^ in the Back-bitings of the former : And altho' this difpofition of Heart while it remains enclofed therein, does no Damage to others ^ it does very confiderable hurt to thofe in whom it abides ; fince we may (in in our Tho'ts as well as in our Words and Anions. It is Criminal before GOD even to Will, what is unjuft before Men. There are perhaps many other ways of fowing and fpreading abroad Detractions, for who can reckon them all up ? But however it be, I am perfwadcd, they may be eafily ranked under fome one of the foregoing Articles and Heads. The defign of this whole Treatife is to overthrow VicCj and to eftablifh Virtue j this in particular was our Intent in this Se^ion, and we cannot better conclude it, than by Ufes drawn from what has been faid, and profitable to Edification. The Ufes of this Sexton. C Hou'd we undertake to fhew all the ^ Ufes that might be drawn therefrom, they wou'd be as long as the Seftion it leli^ We fhall here therefore only juft mention the principal Heads, and finifh with mo- tives and exhortations to avoid the Vice we have been defcribing in its principal Parts. We 32 j4 freatife agasnjl Sect. II. We have faid,That there are almoft in- .^^v^ finite Ways of Detraction ^ bccaule that on the one hand, we make ufe hcrcfor of Turns differing for the moft part one from the other • and on the other hand, That the Faults of Men are alfo different. In regard of the firlt, We ought often to examine our felves, in order todifcover the Means which we ordinarily make ufe of for thisEnd ; or rather, the diverfity of thefe Means, which two things are very difficult : Sirice that if thefe ways are ge- nerally the lame. Habit (^ Cuftom, which might make us know them better, hinder our feeing them ; even as we cannot well difcernObjcds which are too near ourSight, or as we do but little examine into the Motion of the Tongue in lpeaking,becaulc thefe Actions are very frequent & common with us, we feldom or ever think on them, Agaln,lf thefe ways are different, certainly theTroubleofexamining them one after a- nothcr will be very great : Wherefore I fay, Tills mud be done often, and with a great deal of Care and Exaftnefs, fo as that we may know thcni and abltain from them. As to what regar'^.s the Variety and Number of Faults which we tax, we may from thence infer, That every Man is a Sinner, that the Work! in general is very wicked, and that therefore we ought to be on our guard, that we be not corrupted by cyil DETRACTION. 33 evil Examples; that we are to mourn for Sect.II. the Vices of another, without detracting w^'V^^ from him. We fliould pardon all Fauits in others, but none in our felves. PVe Jhould cauje the light of our good Works to pine forth in the midfi of a crooked j^^^ ^^^ and '^eri^erfe Generation. By this Light wclhall behold the Crimes of others, with- out balely reflecting on the Criminals : As the Light of the Sun dilcovers to us the Stains and Spots of a Garment without confuming it. Zeal and Love are like the Fires 'which defcended on the Ap^ Adi» i. ^^ files without fcorching them. Since witty Methods of Detraftion are nioft dangerous both to us and our Neigh- bours, let us ufeourutmoft Endeavours to deliver our felves from them. The more flippery the Way is, the more cautious ought we to be leaft we fall ; and the more dangerous the Fall is, the more careful we fliould be to avoid it. We wou'd let the World fee we have Wit * and to Ihew it, we lay afide all Bowels of Pity. Wewou'd have it known, that we are Owners of a Talent ; and by it and for it, we deftroy our felves. We wou'd pleafe thofe that liften to us, and thereby draw thcin with our felves into a moll dreadful Abyfs. What al Folly ! What a Contradiction ! Do you your felves reflect on the different ways of back-biting, juft now D men- 34 ^ Jreati/e againft Sect. II. mentioned : You will without doubt have ^^orv-» Time and Occafion enough, it' every Tjme that you hear Detradioi , or are tempted^ thereto your felves, you wou'd give a lit- ; tie Attention. Confider that the Ways made ulc of by Detraftors are as criminal asDetradioD it lelf : Think how mean, ralcaily, and unworthy of a Gentleman and a Chriltian they are. We have endeavoured to difcover, as far as was tho't necefTary, the Ways of De- tradion, (i) With reference to it's Sub* jcct and Matter. (2) With refpcdl to the Circumllances by which the Faults & Sins of Men are Ipread abroad. (3.) With re- gard to the Means and Inftruments em- ployed for this End : But to bring the whole to a narrowCompafs, we advife you, not fo much to mind the Failings of Men, which were confider'd under the iirft Ar- ticle, as their good and commendable Qualities. This Advice being followed, we Ih.iU have no need to warn you againft the Means of fpeaking ill, which were men- tioned ill the two following Articles, Wlicn this Fire has no more Alatter to feed upon, there will be no neccflity of Contriving Means to quench it. And truly, what can be more wife, what more realona- blc, than to contemplate Virtue, rather than Vice ? Is it not much more lovely, much DETRJCflON. 35 much more noble, much more agreable to Sect.IL look upon fine Flowers, exhaling a fweet ♦^•'V^^. and charming fmell, than upon a naufeous and loathforhe Sink ^ In a word, is it not vaftly better to contemplate the Work of GOD in good Deeds, than that of the Devil in bad ones ? After having let forth Detradion in the Ways wherein it is praftifed ( happy if we at the fameTime can be made to abhor it !) We proceed toaftiew theNature thereof by it's Sources and Caufes. Thislhall be the Subjed of the following Seftion. SECT. III. Of the Sources of DetraSilon. f 5£f Jf H ERE is hardly any bet- Sect.IH ||f ^^^^f ter Way of finding out the SH T llS Perfedion or Imperfedion %%, ^® of ^ Thing, than by confi- i^^^^i^$'^$^ dering it in it's Caufes and %^%% ®^ Sources • theCaufe &C Effect having much of refemblance between ihem. Thus according to our knowledge ofGood andEvilin it'sCaufes,in a Subject, wx Ihall love or hate it in proportion : Andtofpeafc more particularly of Detradion, the more Poifon we ftiall remark in thcHead-Springs Da thereof, 3(5 A frcatife again ft Sect.III thereof, th': mort: carefully fliould we i- ^■^^^^'^ void drinking of the Water at the Foun- tains, which by their Multitude lorm ^ dangerous Lake and a deep Gulf. More- over as this Heap of Waters may have t\so fofts of Sources, the one internal, even in the Bottom of the Lake itleif; the other external and accidental^ in like manner we find external and internal Sources of Detradion, which we fhall treat of in this Scdion, beginning with the firft. ARTICLE 1. Of the external Sources of Detra^ion. WE call thcfe exteinal Sources, which arc not properly m the Heart and Mind, or which produce Detraction only by Accident. Firfl Source, Profperity. One faid very well, That Religion has three forts of Enemies, Heretic ks, Pcrle- cutors and Plealures, and that the lall are the moft dangerous. In reality, thefe Pleafures have produced Hereticks them- felves ; never did they appear in fo great Number, as after \\\:xCo}iJtantinc had pro- cured DETRJCriON. yr cured the Peace of the Church, and filFd Sect. Ill It with Gifts and Riches. Thefe very ^^"^^"^"^ Pleafures, or this fame Profpenty, have very often rais'd up Perfccuiors ; Witncfs all thole Princes, v/ho have extended their Pcrlecutions according as they enlarged the Bounds ot theirKingdoms. And to apply this to my Subje(!:t j ne\er was lefs Detrac- tion feen in the Church, than when it was moft cruelly harafs'd and corn to pieces j becaufe that in general, Affliftions Sc Ad-^ verfity fute Piety much better than Prof^ perity, and particularly in Perfecution, we have other Affairs than thole of De- tradion. 'Tis then we return to G O D, and with earneft Prayers beg of him, that his Worfiiip may be agam eftablilhcd : 'Tis then we endeavour to appeafe him by a newnefs of Life : 'T is then, when Dan- ger is common to all the Members of the Church, a Man wilhes ihe Happincfs of all thro' Love as well as lutcreft, iince no good can happen to them, but he muft •alfo be a partaker therein. In a word, no one is for perfecuting others, by back-^ bitings, when he bimlelf is under Perfecu- tion, unlefs it be, that he is willing his own Perfecutors Ihoiild fuffcr by it. But now Piofperity makes a Man look on others w'Ch Haughtincfi and Contempt. ( And what we have laid of Prolperity in a gcncriJi way, may be applied to every D 3 particular "^8 j4 Treatifc aga'tnfi Sect. Til particular Pcrfon who is in that Eitate. ) ^'-^^"'T"^ A Man oftentimes thinks himfelf the bet- ter when he is Riclier than others, and e- qually iniults their miferies and failings. He will very often enlarge the one and publilh the other. Pleafure^^ ordinarily give birth to Faint-heartednels and Indif- lerence for GOD's Glory and our Neigh- bour's Welfare. Thus Men thro' theCor- ruption of their Hearts, ufually abule the good things of their Creator. Thus thole who under Perfecuticn wou'd not back- bite their very Perfecutors,have in another State, fpoken Evil of their Neighbours, their Relations and their Benefactors. Second Source, Frcqueni; Examples. We have already noted, that the Sin we are writing againft, is very conimon in the World In this Section we fhall fhew the Rcaibn why it is fo. It is lb, bccaufe this Sin goes unpuniflicd, and becaule we are engaged therein by many Pailions and other things. This being laid down, we mull alfo luppoie another Truth, namely, that we have a great prcpcnlity to follow Cuftom, antl imitate what we lee practiced. Hence it comes to pais, that many times, Examples engage us to do thii.crs for which at firit we had much Indifference and even an Averfion. How then fliouM yx be a- blc DEfRJCriON. 30 Sect.III ble to avoid imitating a Vice, to which we v^^ ^< have fo much Inclination as that of De- tradion, and which fuits fo well with our natural, that is, corrupt Diipofition ; What adds ftill more force to thefe Examples is, that they come from thofe who are accoun- ted Gentlemen, and vvho truly wou'd be 'afliamed to do an Injury to a Neighbour in any other of his Goods, befides that of his Honour : Men, who are led on to de- tract:, only bccaufe they don't really reflect on the 'Evil that accrues thereby to the Perfon detraded. A Third Source, Impunity. There is certainly nothing more capable of encouraging a Crime, as Men are now difpofed, than Impunity. Perhaps there are forfie who think that Detradion does but little hurt toSociety, becaufc the Overfcers and Managers thereof do permit it. However it be, this is certain, that when Men have no outward Bridle to curb them in,they give up themfelves with Frenzy to their Vices. When publick Pcrfons do not punifh them, nor private Perfons ihame them, they are no longer kept within the Bounds of Duty^ by thefe Confiderations, which might where they have there di e Weight, hinder them from falling into Vices and Excelfcs, There is D 4 no 40 A freatife againfi Sect. Ill no need of proving, that Detraction is not ^■^^"Vv^ panilhcd by Magiltrates • This is notori* oufly evident, and if you except that De- traction which ftrikes at Sovereigns, we can't ( I believe, ) find an Example to the contrary in this Age, A Fourth Source, T'he Eaftnefs of Detra^ion. One Source of this Sin is, that it cofts neither Money nor Trouble to commit it; Whereas a Man can't oriiinarily ^^/ druuk without laying out his Caih. In like manner the covetcous Periun can't hoard up his numeious Treafurcs without Sweat and Fatigue. On the contrary, it is ealy to detract in rcpcfe, and free from the Toils ?nd Vexations of the other. Thus a co- vetcous Man may well be a Detractor, tho' we Icldom ice him a Drunkard or a Wliorc-Maiter. What renders this Sin ftill more common is, that it may agree, at leait in feme manner, with all other Vices, whereas there are many others which are incompatible, as wc have already fhew n. A Fifth Source, The frequent Occafions that -zvc luivefur Detrauiion. There ?.rc an infinity of thefeOccafions, Hs w:]l wii'.i rcgaid to the great I'^upiber of DErR^criON. 41 of Faults obfeivabie in our Neighbours, Sect.IH as with refpcct to the Eafinels of pradi- ^-^^^^"^ cing this Vice ; and alio with reference to the vail Number of Perfons, who arc ever ready to hften to and commend defamers. Having in another Part of this Tr^jatile, already fpoken of thefeOccafions, we Ihall not any longer Hop here. We do not here fpeakof the Sources of Corruption in general ^ becaufe that, altho' thofe of Detradion make a gonfiderable part of this Corruption which reigns to this Day among Chrifti^ns, ytt thiswou'd parry us too far from our Subjed • befides, that they have been very w^U handled in the laft Age. ARTICLE 7/;' Of the internal Sourees of DetraHion^ \\J E call thofe internal Sources which ^^ are found in the very Perlon of the Detrador, whereas thofe we have fpoken of in the preceeding Article refer to fome external Circumftances. The Firft Source, Original Sin. There is no principle more deeply root- ed in the Heart of Man, than this Sin,fince it was enfolded therein even before his Birth. 41 ^ Treatf/e agaitijt feaeT.TII Birth. Behold^ fays David on this Sub- ^ryv^ jeft, / uuas Jhapen iti biiqntty^ a fid in ^m * *^'* ^ did my Mother conceive me. Alter the fall of our iirft Parents, the Earth became covered with Thorns and Thirties and vc- nemousReptiles, and filFd with evil Roots which remain until this Day, notwith- ftanding theDeluge, which one wou'd have tho't, Ihou'd thoroughly cleanfe it. In the like manner, the Heart of yldnm was full of the defilement of Sin, which he has tranlmitted to his Pofterity. Righteous KojL\ the fecond Father ot Mankind, was not exempt therefrom, nor wv.fh'd clean by the Baptifm of overflowing Waters. He left to his Children what he had himfclf received from yldam. Some pretend, that our Inclination to Evil arifes only from the Examples that are daily fet before us. I confefs, as has been already fhewn, that Examples greatly contribute thereto, but 1 deny thatExam- ples do all intirely ^ or elfc let any one tell me, what Example of Murder had Cam Q^^ g. before his Eyes, when he flew his Brother u^bel. True indeed, he had feen the Dif- obedience of his Parents ; but it was ahb from this very Difobcdicnce to the divine Laws, from this very Sin of the hi ft Irlia- bitants of theWorld, that the Source of all our Vices arifes. Having DET'RACflON. 43 \ Having thus fhewn the general principle SectJU of Sins, of whofe Number Detraaion is ^-^^^"^ one, let us fee more particularly how this arifes from that fatal and communicative Fountain. Here is the Reafon thereof. If Jdam had notfinn'd, all his Vofterity had been faultlefs and confequently none could have detrafted, and being all exempt from Sin, we Ihould have been fo far from detracting, that we ftiou'd have had an ardent Love for one another. But infteadofthis, fome would think, that the Tongue of the Serpent which did fo much evil to our firft Parents has pafled ^ -'^^ from the Tempter into the Tempted, and their Off-fpring. Thefe Men endeavour to do as much Mifchief to each other by their Tongue, as Satan did then by his. They don't feel themfelves fufficiently wounded it feems, and wou'd perfefl the Wounds,and make them ftill deeper.From what we have faid,it appears, that this firft Sin, which ought to be lookt upon, or at leaft underftood and fappofed as one of the Caufes of all Vices, Ihould moreparticularr ly be accounted a Source of that Vice we are arguing againft The Second Source, Idlenefs. The Mind which often times avoidsLa- bour, will neverthelefs be bufied about fomething 44 \A7icatif(S again/l Sect.III fomething. Wherefore if it finds nothing ^"^^^^ in it's own proper Fund for Amufcmcnt,it will meddle with other Men's Aifairs, and mike them it's own. Wile and happy indeed, if it intermeddled only to plcalurc them ! But this it does not. As Idienefs is an evil Source, it can produce only evil Effects. Thus many will pry into their Neighbours Life, only to pick Faults, and then expofe them to the World. Now to prove, that Idienefs produces Detraction, we fhall bring the Teftimony of S. Pauly and our daily Experience. The Apoftle fpeaking of certain Widows of his time, ;Tlm.j.i3fays, j4nd uoithal they learn to be idUy twanderingfrom Houfe toHouJe \ and not only idle^but tatlcrs aljd,and Bufehod'tes^ freaking thi?igs "which they ought not. And does net Experience teach us, that thcfe things arife fromabufive Difcourle ? Perhaps feme who rcfomble thefe Widows ■ftrou'd juftify themfelves by the Purity of y their Intentions, which arc not to hurt *■ their Neighbours in the kaft, but only for Paftime and Diveriion. I anfwer. That it is the fame thing, let the Intentions of aBack-bitcr bt what they f wiil, fincc a Man's Reputation is after the fame manner wounded And again,Time is a thing too dcar,too precious and too irre- parable, to be fpcnt in unpratitablcnefs, much Ids evil things. Let us rather hear ihc the Apoftlc's Exhortation, Redeem the Sect.III Ttme^ becaafe the Days are Evil • Evil oO'^ inaihiuch as they are Ipent in Sin ; Fjuily ^ ' ^' ^ becaafe they will one Day prove fatal to thofe who have fpentthem foill • at leaft if they do not repent in the time aliowy them therefor. Let us not then add the Sin of Detradion to all other Sins we commit. Still furthei*, the Rcpntation of our Bre- thren is too touching, too afiecting to be raviflied from them, only that we may be the pleafured and diverted at their Coft. A Third Source, Impudence, To be convinced of this, we need only confider how neceflary Impudence is in or- der to detrad with fo much Tranfport af many do : And moreover it is certain, that Baftifulnefs, which is oppofed to Im- pudence, Ihuts the Mouth in making the Mind fubmiffive. In fuch a ftate as this, a Man wou'd be fo far from hurting his Neighbour by Detradion, that he wou'd not dare to be feea ia it. It is often the tho't of his own Failings that produces this baflifalnefs. Certain it is, that Modefty is fo commendable,fo excellent and fo contra- ry to Impudence, that it is a conftant Bar to back-biting. Thefc latter therefore poffefs tv o greatVrtues, Modefty and Cha- rity, while the former have two great Faults, Impudence and Detradion. A 4""v->*/ the great Ones, from whom he expedis Wages &C Penfions, and to pleafe them, de- tracts from all thofe they are difpleafcdvvith. Another will decry the Condud of a Perfon raifed to a gainful Poft, thereby in- finuating, that the Man does not deferve it, but that he himfelf merits it much better. There is nothing more common tlian to hear Perfons of the fame Profeffion back- bite each other. They will fay all the ill poflible of thofe who exercife the lame Calling with themfelves. To bring or keep Cuftomers to themfelves, and fo hinder them from going ro others, they will re- prefent them as knavilh & cheating. Who does not fee that it is not the Love they have for Cuftomers, which makes them talk afifer this manner but only a Defire of Gain ? Wou'd you know why many Folks will talk fo difadvantageoufly of a Poor Man's Conduft ^ it is, that they may not be bla- med for not helping him by their Chiiity, as tho' he did notdeferve it. By thistlicy pretend to juftify their hard-heartednefs. And tho' we ought not to give without Diftinction, the Faults of the Poor are ra- ther the pretence, than the Rcafon wiiich hinders us Irum doing them good. E 4 Do 56 yi JrccHtJe againfi Sect. Ill Do we not fee, That after Iiaving fpo- "^^^^^^ ken ill of a Mancontrary to our Intcrcft, we again prailb him, if he takes to our fide ? An evident Sign that we talk ac- cording to our own Interefts. In a Word, We may make an intereftcd Man fay any thing againft the Reputation of his Neigh- tours, who loves nothing of them or in them but their Money, lo blinded is he with a Defire of heaping it up. I believe then that when the Holy Scripture fo fre- quently threatens covetous Perfuns with Hell, it is partly becaufe Avarice breeds Detraction: And that Dctradion is fo fre- quently condemned by theWord of GOD, becaufe it has Avarice for it's Principle and End. A Fourteenth Source, Hypocrijy. Detractors wou'd make thofe, before whom they detract, believe, That they themlclvcs arc very lar iVom the Vices they blame in others, it being unnatural to fpeak ill of thole whom we rckmble ; altho' oftcrtlmes they have the very fame Faults. Is not this pure Hypocrify ? Still farther. The Words they make ufe ©f ior Detraction fufilcicntly fliew on various oc- calions, iluc Hypocrify is the Source r ov. ir. j-jj^.^eof Jri Hypocrite ijuith his To/i^uc dntro)S biS ^cf^hbuitryW^^s ^qIowqtl His ll'^rds JVords were fofter than Oily yet were Si.cT.lU they drawn Swords^ faid his Father before pfQ^, him. Detradion is an Hypocrify which conlifts in Ipeaking well^ ( for what is there better than to fay the Truth ? ) and it confills alfo in doing ill • ( for what is there worfe than to deftroy the Reputation of our Brethren ? ) Hypocrify leads to Hell by the way to Heaven, ^ How am I troubled, fays one, * for the Love Ibear Mr. N that he * ftiould commit fo bale an Aftion as that * I fhall acquaint you with ! " Are you troubled, O perfidious Man, and yet will you encreafe his Shame by publifhing it ! Perfons of this Charader wou'd feem wil- ling to hide the Thing, but they foon fuf- fer themfelves to be overcome by Quefli- - ens and Entreaties. They wou'd apparent- ly excufcthofe they fpeak ill of ^ but truly the furefl way of excufing is, not to ac-» cufe them. What ftill further provesthe Hypocrify of thefe Men is, That no fooner Ihall they meet a Pcrlbn abroad, whom they have been juft before back-biting, Uit they will make him a thoufandOffers of Service, and xedoubled Proteftations of a tender andfm- ccre Friendfhip. If this be not after ha- ving detracted, it will be perhaps before: Like thole Pagans, who adorn'd the Vidims ready forSacrilice;WithGarlan(k ofFlowers, or jS ^4 freatifa againjl Sect.III or the Jews, who after having rcfolvcd ^^^'^^^"^ the Death of our Saviour, as of an infa- johA i:?,i ^^^^5 Perfon, cloathcd him with a Purple Robe, the Mark of Royalty. As the Words 8c Adions of Hypocrites arc very bale fo they are very dangerous, becaufe it looks by thefe affected Difcour- i^^^ as tho' it were only the Power of Truth which made them talk thus, and confequcntly they produce a very terrible EfFed on the Hearer's Mind, to the pre- judice of our Neighbour's Reputation. In a Word, The Devil is never more to be feared than when he transforms himfeJf z Cor. II. i/jia an ylngcl of Light. GOD condemns and forbids Hypocrily in fo many places of his Word, that it wou'd be tedious to mention them all. You may fee hereupon, Jol^iS'34- Pfalm ^1,2, Matth,6.2. Marie 7. 6. 6Cc. From which places it appears, that when we wou'd abufe others, wchurt our fclvcs. A Sixteentli Source, y^ f^lfi and blind ZcjI. A blind and ialfc Zeal for Religion and our own Party oi'tcn caufcs Detraction. We think to do G O D Service by hurt- ing thcReputation of thole whom wc llip- pofe to act contrary to his Glory. And a Man ofthii, Character fpeaks ill ot thofc of a Religion which tic has quitted, in or- der DETRACriON. ip dcr to perfwade them of a Communion heSECT.III is about to embrace ; that he has as much ^-^^V"^ Deteitation for his firft Engagements as AiFedtion for his laft. I call this Zeal falfe and blind,becaufe it is diredly contrary to theSpirit ofChrillia- nity, which breaths nothing but Meeknefs and Svveetnefs. We may fay fo to thqfe who are pofleffed herewith, as our Lord to his Dilciples, when they wouM have had him confum'd the Inhabitants who denied them Entry into their City, ye know /;i?/^"^'•^^9- ofv^hat Sprit ye are. A trucZeal for G O D' s Houfe enflames ^^^ ^^ ^^ and eats up our Hearts ; but that is a blind Zeal, which eats up the Reputation of o- ther Mejn by heaping Injuries on them. The Maxims of thofe who have efpoufed any Party either in State Affairs or others are far from being Chriftian. We do, as it were, lift thofe of our own Party to the Stars, that fo we may link thofe of the oppofite fide to Hell. But does it not many times happen, tl>at the divided Par- ties unite, and fo we become the Prey of thofe whom we have offended ? From the Zeal and Paffion we have for a Party, I pafs to that we have for particular Pcrfons. If we are very much affedted to :^> particular Man, there's nothing but wliv we can fay againfthis Enemies. We truft fuch a Man with what we know at the Coil 6o J frcatifa againfi SECT.IIICoft of our Neighbour's Reputation. In ^•^^C^ fine, if he loves Dctradtion, we arc furc to dctrad, to pleafc him. A Seventeenth Source, Jealoufy. It is the general Opinion of the World, That the Praifes given to others, arc fo many lecret Reproaches of their own Con- duct, they therefore do every thing poffi- ble to free themfelves from thefe Reproa- ches : For this end, they do their utmoft to efface and raze out oi ourMinds,the good Opinion we have of other's Virtues, They leek all Occafions hereior, and inwardly rejoice and triumph when they have found them. An envious Man, tormented w ith his own PafTior, perfecutes others by De- pro.i7. 4- . ti"^^ioi^- Wrath is cruely and Jnger is " outragious^ but ^'ho can Jlami before En- iTira,^. ^? St. P^r// joins Detiadion, Jealoufy and evil Sufpicions together, to fhew the Connedion thev have each with the other. Arc not they very Criminal who endea- vour to hurt thole that have given them no caufcfor fuch ill Treatment ? Whereas in reality the Merit of any ought to be a Motive to to others to praife them, and fpread the Ivcect Odour of their Renown itill finJicr. Wlicn we wou'd tarnilli their i^ood QuaUtieSjdo we not endeavour to ob- lurc iKc Gifts and Graces of the Lord P Since DEtRACTlON. tfi Since he IS the Author of them. 7^ /^^SectJII Eye Evily becaufe God is Good ? Should sQC^. we not rather imitate the Conduft of Mo- m- /eSy who, when one told him, That many prophefied in the Camp, which was looked upon as anUfurpationothis Rights, and a Diminution of his Authority, anlvver'd in ^^^^^^^ ^^^ thefe Words, Envieji thou for my Jake'^,z9' JVould to Gody that all the Lord's People ^were Prophets^ and that the Lord would pit his Spirit upon them. Inftead of Ipea- king Etilof them, and endeavouring to prclervc his own Credit by ruining \hcmy he rejoiced ift the Favour GOD had oone his People, and reproved the Man who would have provoked him to Jealoufy. It is faid indeed by Detradors,that they don't blame what is good in others, nor fpeafc ill of any Thing but what is bad inrhem. But is it not certain, that fome known Vi- ces are more than fufficicnt to difcrcdit Perfons, altho' they may have many good Qualities befides ? And thus they injure then by fpeakingonly of their badQuahties. An Eighteenth Source, Pride and Self'Lo've. Thefe were the lirft Vices wherewith Adam was corrupted \ and which caufed him to fin j and he finn'd by giving way to them : Thefe alfo are the favourite Vices of his Pofterity. Thefe are our firft Habits, 6i Jl Treatife againfi Sect.III Habits, and remain in us longcfi: : For it is v.^''"^^"^^ the Habit of this Sin, \vhich he has prin- cipally left to his Children. Aniong the many Forms in which it fhews it IcU, \vc eafily perceive that of Detraction. Solomon fays exprcffly of that fort of Detraction ^vhich is called Railery, yV^/z^cf /jr/^/j/y Scorner is his Name "who dcalcth in '^roud frratl\ Here we may fay, Firjiy Pride and Self- Love blind us fo as that we don't know our own defects. Or if they fufier us to fee them, it is in fo fmall a Character, that we can hardly dif- cover them. When we are going to con- fider our felvcs with refpeft toour Impcr- fc<^ions, we make ufe of thofe deceitful Glaflcs which reprefent Objcdsat a diftance which is much greater than inReality they arc, or of thofe which make Objects ap- pear much lefs than they ufually do, or in a word, if we fee thefc Faults in all their Light and fuch as they really arc, we for- get them, as a Man that views hiwfclf Urn, 1.24. //; ^ Qlafs ; as foon as he ccafcs to ^^jicuo hi njfclj\ forgets isohat manner of Man he 'Vjas. Such a Man lays fecretly to him- felf with the Pride of the Pharilce in the 1^,^,8 J j^Gofpcl, / am not as other Men. His very Pride hinders him from feeing that he is proud, when he back- bites others. Secondly^ V h9 R AC? iG N. 63 Secondly^ This Vice makes our ownVir-SECT.IH tues and other Men's Vices appear very ^^^''v^^ confiderable. We then make ule of thole Glafles which reprefentObjeds as near and large, tho' indeed they have this in com- mon with the others, that they are equally deceitful. The Height of a Man appears ^43^x8^4. as great as that of a Tree, to thole Men who are half blind. They heap up all the Circumftances which may aggravate aFault, but never mention thofe which might ex- tenuate it. Upon the good Opinion they have of themfelves and the evil Opinion they have of others, they fancy they have fo much the better Foundation to detrad from others, as they fancy others can have no hold of them. Self-Love on theThrone makes Tyrants, and Self-Love in Subjeds makes Detractors, who are Tyrants to a Neighbour's Credit. Both would rule ac- cording to their Station and Manner, and imagine, that all others ought to be be- neath thcm^ becaufe they only defcrve to be above tlicm, being unable to bear cither Mailers or liqivals. They arc unwilling to be fir ft anjong the laft ; they would be liril among the firft. They who do not carry theirPride to lb high aDegrec, wou'd at leaft be placed in the fecond Rank, al- f ho' they don't delerve to be in the fixth. 64 -^ Treatife again^ Sect.III I appeal for what I have faid and fliall fay, to the knowledge ot'cve\y Man. Cer- tain it is, it' they exariiine thcmfelvcs, they \vill be obliged by the Strength and Evi- dence of Truth to confelSjthat what I have advanced is but toa certain. Indeed, the Coniciencc ot' one particular Man is but a fingle 'Witness ^ but then join all the Conicienccs of proud Detractors together, and you will find almoft an Infinity of Witneffcs and Evidences. Is it not real, is it not true, that Self- Love at what Time it perfwades us of our own line and good Qualities prompts us to perlwade oiliers thereol? But how ? It is by cafting Sliades on the Pidures we draw^ of our NeighbourSjtliat lo theColours of oursmay appear more bright and lively. Is it not true, that proudDetr'adorSj fancy- ing all due to themfelves, believe, they injure tlicmlelves in praifing i thers? That hereby they rob thenilelves ot a good which properly is their own -and they are as truly of this Opinion as it is I'alfe that they are the only delerving Perfuns. Building here- upon they t:}ke all irom others, that lo they mayreier all to themfelves. TliisSelf-Love belonging and appertaining to them, they arc ready to believe, that all which may latisfy it, belongs to them alio. Is it not true, that we wouVl have our lelves alone talked of^ and for this End endeavour to make make others fo contemptible, as that the Sect.IIJ World ftiould fay nothing at all of them, or elfe nothing that is good. Is it not fur- ther true, that as much as a Man loves to be himfelf fet forth,lb much he endeavours tofupprefs the Difcourfe upon other Per- fons ? Is it not certain, That we wou'd have all the World love us, a5 much as we do our felves? As wc love none butourlelves, fo we wou'd have others love none but us ; and perfwade 'em that we only are worthy of Love. To prove this we rec- kon up the Faults of others,which render them unworthy of our Love, as we pre- tend. Oftentimes a love of vain Glory caules. That it is fufficient, that a Book hasgaiu'd the Suffrage of the Publick, for a Man to undertake the task of difcovering it's im- perfeftions, that fo he may ftiew himlelf one of much greater Wit, than the reft of Mankind, who have not with-held their Approbation for a Work which did not deferve it, as he endeavours tolhevvto the utmoft of his Ability. Thefe dilcoveries he fets much by • but being more eafy to find Fault than to do better himfelf, he affords matter for otherCriticks, to remark more Faults in his own Cenfures, than in the Works which he has been critizing upon. F From 66 ji Jreatije aghinfi Sect.III From hence it comes alio, That a Man ^^^"^^^^^ detracts from his Neighbour, thereby to inlinuatc, that he has a great Judgment in all things, that he knows how to make ju,ft Differences, that he very well knows the Heart of a Man, and that he perceives Faults which others do not. So that- if any one praifcs a Man in his fre- fencc, he Will endeavour to fhcw that on the contrary he is blame-worthy tliat fohc may tacitly degrade thePerfon praifingand prailed, and even thole in the Company, below himfclf. Hence alfo it happens that Perfons who condemn grofs Raillery, will yet approve of nice Dctradion by their own Cordud. Why ? Bccaulc Genius and Wit appear therein, and vain Glory finds it's Account in it. Should a Man fay, / am a learned Miin^Iam a Gentleman^ the Pride which he Wou'd conceal, wou'd be too vifiblc. This then is not the Way we take to make our fclves cQcemcd. We therefore only fpeak of other Men's Vices, and do oppofe them to our own Virtues, which indeed wc do not mention • but even this perhaps is with a Dcfign of obtaining afecondGlory for a fahe Modcfty. '' In a^word, Tlie rcafon why wc attri- bute fo'hiany like and common Effects as Hatred and others,to Pride and Dctradion, )\ becaufc the former is the Source of the latter, DEfRACflOU 67 latter, from the EfFed we trace the Caufe. Sect.UI Wc many times detract from another, be- caufe we love our felves beyond meafure. But is not this Proceeding entirely unjaft? What can be more fo, than to defire that others wou'd bear us as great Friendfhip as we do our felves, and at the fame time for us to be againft loving them, as we do oar felves: what more unjuit, than to Ihewas much hatred to them by our injurious Dif- courfe, as we wou'd have them Ihew Love to us? What can be more contradidory than our Sentiments on this Subjed ? We degrade, we decry Perfons, and yet if they were to applaud and commend us, we Ihould be ravilhed therewith. Strange that we Ihou'd think it an Honour to receive Praifes from thole who in our Judgments, don't deferve any themlelves ! Docs it not Ihew that this Self-Love is very blind,and that provided aMajn will but flatter it/tis no matter who he is, or how he does it ! To latisfy thisSelf-Luve,we blame others, and to content it, wc ereedily catch at their Praifes. What a Contradidion ! This Detradion and this vain Glory aic very Criminal before God, who fays to us by Solomon, Be not 'wife in thifie own EyeSy Prov. 23 4. Let us follow the Ex- p^^-^^ ^^ 3^ hortation of St. Paul who fays, In lowli- nefs of Mind let each ejieem others bet-- ter thm thcmfelves. And elfcwhere, p 2. ^hi^t 68 J freatifi agawfi Sect.IIIw/jj/ baft thou that thou hajl not re^ Yo^^C^i ^^^""^^^^ ^ ( '■^ indeed thou haft received more Giits and more Talents than thy Brethren, ) and if thou hajt rccc'rced it^ why then duji thou "vaunt thy fe If as tho' thou hadft not recerccd tt ? But thou knoweft nothing, a-nd thou boafleft in vain, if thou art ignorant, that Pride and De- iraftion arc Sins which God will punifh. And if thoudoft know this, remember, that I. tike u. /7^ cir^ifj icnouos his Majter's IVill^ and does it not^pall be beaten "with many Jlr/pcs. Alt thou ignorant of what the Chap. ^ Apoftlc fays to the Galatians ? Let us not vcr.a6. be dej/rous oj'i'din GIor)\ pyoi:ohing one another. Doft thou not know, that, fpeak- ^ ^.^ , . ing of the latter Times, he fays, thdiiMen z. '* Jloall be lovers of thernfelves. An Nineteenth Source, Jlratl\ in.i :>ii This PafTion is frequently one of the Sources of Detradion, Fury furniflies with ftrat, vi,. "Weapons : Now Detradion is one of the fiery Darrs of the wicked One, who is Eph6. 19 called an Accufcr of tlie Brethren : Fury tlien produces Detradion. This direful Paflion deprives of Reafon and Judgmcnr, and quenches the Flames of Love. On a thouiuid Occafions it fparcs not Blows, I.cw \\\vi\ Ihould it fpare Words ? A furi- ous DETRJCflON. 6^ ous Man is not Mailer of himfelf, how Sect.III then fhoa'd he hide what concerns his V^V"^ Neighbour ? A Man can't be truly angry with another^ but he will make him feel it, at leaft by his Difcourfe. Of this Paffion the Apoftle warns the World, faying. Let ^^^ ^ ^^ not the Sun go down on your fVrath. St. James declares, xhix, the }frath of Man chap.i. ^orketh not the Righteoufnefs ( or ful- ""''• ^''' fils not the Commandments ) of God, I know there arc majiy who pretend to excufe their Detraftions by faying, they were Angry and in a Paffion, when they fpake fo. I acknowledge, there appears lefs premeditated Defign herein, than in thofe who detrad thro' Hatred, Self-Love or Envy. Neverthelefs, as it is very blame- worthy to be wrotha gainft our Neigh- bours, fo Detradion, which refults there- from,is very much to be condemned. They are both Sins ; How then can a Man pre- tend to excufe himfelf by covering one Vice with another ? Can any one lay. It was a Fire of Love which kindled this Wrath ? Let us not then fay,/w^^ drunky or, / was mad : feeing tranfgreffions and complication of Sins, never make a Caufc the belter. A Twentieth Source, Hatred. It is very common, I own, to call thofe Perfons, whom we fpeak ill of Friends. F 3 But yo A freatife a^ai/ifl SECT.ir^ But what fhall wc call Hatred, if this be ^i^no^ nut that evil Principle \vhich leads us to hurt them, either in their Honour or any- other of their Goods F It may chance,that a Mm will flatter thole whofe Wrath he fears, or whole Smiles he defires, cither in tlK'ir own Prefence, or before theirFricnds, but a Man will never fpcak ill of thole whcm he truly loves. This is quite contra- dictory ; and in this regard, Light and Darkncfs can never agree. This is fo true, That wc can't even ice the Defeds of one we love. We call thofe Things Virtues in him, which in another wc fhould namjj Vices : Or if wc perceive his Defects, we do our utmoil to hide them.Conlequcntly, Hatred makes a Man detra6l:,and from Ha- tred ariles thePleafure we take in hearing th fe Peribns fpoken ill of, w^hom we don't aifeft, which in it felf is a conceived Detraction, and will doubtlefs quickly bring forth. The Caulc of this Hatred is frequently the moft Irivolous imaginable : Sometimes, becaufe a Man has not Ibllowed our Ad- vice ; or has not entrufted us with a Se- cret that wc wanted toknow,cr fomc other fiich matter of as little importance. M()rcovcr, altho' the Caufe of Hatred may be frivolou??, yet the Sin is not io : The holy Scripture orders us to love tvcn tlicfe that hate us moft. A D EfR jf C flON. yt A Twcnty-firft Source, Revenge, SfecT.III Dctraftion is certainly one of the raoft fare and common Ways of teftifying our Refentment and Revenge. We many times detrad before we have revenged our felves, in fome other way than that of the Tongue, to ftiew that we ftiall have caufe fo to do ; or elfc after ^ to fticw that we had reafon for fo doing, and to juftify our revenge. How many Perfons do we fee detract to revenge themfelves on fome-body who had fpoken flightily of them before ^ In a Word, Wou'd you be revenged of your Enemy, Go and tell fome-body, that his Entmy has fpoken ill of him ^ doubt- lefs if the latter can, and if he be not one who fears GOD, he will, do him all the Hurt poffible,and fo you will be revenged by his revenging himfelf. I fay that Detradion is one of the moft certain means of Revenge, becaufe that truly we can't hardly do a Man more hurt than to take away his Reputation. But if this be a moft fu re way to hart others, it is a moft certain way to deftroy one's felf; firce St Paul exprehly forbids it .* Dearl]j ^^'^' '^• belovedy fays he, Avenge not your felves^ but rather give "place unto Pt^'^ratb ; for it is isoritteUyl^engeance is mine : I "will F 4 f^p^y^ 7^ ^ freatife againd SECT.m repay^ faith the Lord. Is not this Prohi- bition cxprcfs both from the Mafter, and from the Difciple ? In a word, Wc fhould reftrain by all means ourPrejiidices, Illufionsand Paflions, which lb eagerly urge us on to back-bite thofe, who Iwve Itirred them up ^ and thereby we fhall put an End to the moft ordinary Sources of this Sin,and which con- tribute not a little to make it a Sin. Refledions upon "what has been fatd in this Se5iion. TH E Heart perhaps has not more Vcflels, which receive the Blood, and caufe it to circulate thro' the humanBody, than Detradlion has Sources, which carry it thro' the Body politic. We need not then be aftonifticd, that it is lb very com- mon in the World, as we Ice it to be when all thefe various ways are made ule of, andcloathed under fo many different Garbs, I own that all thefe various Sources are not ordinarily found at the fame Time and in the famcPerfon. But then one of them is fifficicnt to produce a thoufand Detrac- tions, Stories and Railleries • befidcs they may be all met with at diflcrcnt Times. Thefe D Ef R ^ C r I N. 13 . Tbefe Sources are not only the Caufes Sect.IH of, and precede Detraftion, but they even ^•^''V^ accompany it, and as it were incorporated with it, and make a Part of it ; as the firft matter with which we kindle a Pile of Wood, is a Caufe, an Acceffary, and a Part of the Fire, which refults therefrom. For Inftance, a Detra&-«n "i^^ ^^. ^^, i^:p'efsJy forbids it. /J^jfeio^ N dilcourfmg of the Sources of "^ I P Detradion, we have Ihewn, That Sect.IV^^^ c:^^ moftofit's Caufes are Trefpalfes ^ ot the divme Law : JLet us now fee the cxprefs Prohibitions made againft committing it. The Fir/i we mention is from LcviLio. y«r, 15. Thou Jljalt not go up and down as a fafc^ bearer among m^ People, That is,Thoa Ihalt not go about to intorm thy felf ot Perfons Lives and their Faults,that fo thou may'tt: inlorm others of them, and recipro- cally to tell the i\i% or ot-hersj what thou haft DET'RACflON. • 7^ haft heard of the laft : Not that GOD con- SectIV, demns only this Ibrt of Detraftion, but '•^v^ becaufe thofe who make a Bufinefs of de- trafting from their Neighbours, are moft blameable : Thofe Words, Among thy PeoplCy fhew that thofeMen are more cri- minal, who detrad from thofe of their own Nation. Thus it follows, That De- traction is an Evil, fince GOD, who for- bids nothing but what is evil, has forbid- den it. A Second Prohibition is in Prov. ch.24. ^^^^ ^g Be not JVitnefs againji thy Neighbour without a Caufe. We fay, That j3etrac- tion is here forbidden, becaufe in reality it is a Witnefs brought againft our Neighbour without a Caufe, when neither the care of our own Honour, and our own Vindica- tion, when alfo neither any publickGood, or the Magiftrate requires it of us. Thefe Words refer fo much to Detradion, that it feems to me that they might be made the Definition of it. Thus as on the one hand, we are forbidden to hide or dilguifc the Truth, when we are called to tell it ; even fo on the other hand, we are not to difcover it to the Prejudice of ourBrcthren, when humane and divine Laws do not en- gage us thereto. What Solomon adds in the fame Verfe, For why wilt thou make believe with thyLipy Ihews that Deceit is 8o A freatifs againji Sect.IV is a Source of Dctraclion, as has been al- ^^^*^^^^ ready fhcwn. Thirdly^ St. Paul forbids Detraction in Ver. i> Eph. 4. La all h'ttternefs^ and h^'rath^ and Anger ^ and Clamour^ andEvil-Jj/eak- ing be fut auoay from you. Fourthly^ The fame Apoftle fays in Col. 3. ' But now put ye ojj^ all Anger ^ Vsr. 8. lYrath, DetraBtofh After he had repre- fcnted to them the Sins, with which they were Itained during their Paganifm, the Apoftle warns them to lead a more pure and holy Life in theirState ofChriftianity, and coniequcntly to avoid Anger, Wrath and Detradion, which are truly Sins, fee- ing they areoppolite to Holincfs. Fijthh\ The Apoftle writing to his Ch.j.vcr 1 Difciple t'ttus^ commands him to exhort Men X.0 fpeah evil of no Man. 'Tis true, The original Word may fignify to hlaj* pheme^ which properly regards the Divi- nity. But both the Origin of the Word, which fignifys to blaft a Man's Reputation and the Ufage of the lacred Authors, who very often take it for, to detra^iy and the Circumftances of this Text, plainly ftiew, that we may very well tranflate itytojpeak evil. And truly the Defign of St. Paul both before and after, is only to fet before Men thcirDuty towards their Neighbours, and efpecially in ihcfe Words, where he bids then/ /peak evil 0/ no man. Sixthly^ DETRACTION. Si Sixthly^ St. James expreflly forbids us SectIV; to fpeak Evil one of another^ wherein he ^*jjJ[J^j forbids us to fpcafc evil, not only, when no one has given Occafion therefor, but even when another has formerly back-bit- ten us ; fo that we are not to detrad from the very Aggreflbrs, ARTICLE //. ff herein it is provedy fhat Detraftion is a Sin, by Confequences drawn from Paffages out oftheOUfefiamenh T^ Etraftion is a very great Sin, fince it •*^ is contrary to three Precepts of GOD'S Law. Firjly To the Sixth Command, f}ooit fhalt not kill. What makes me fay, that Detradion is a kind of Murder, is, I. Becaufe it takes from theDetrafted, that fort of Life which confifts in being loved by, or dear to Men ( which is at leaft one Pleafures of Life, ) by deftroying the good Opinion which are very often infe- perable from humane Nature. If then wc take away this Life of the Soul, we do in fome way Murder the Man \ we deftroy the Soul as far as a Spiritual Nature can be dcftroyedj which being in it felf im- G mortal, Si ' A freatife aj^ai/i/l Sec^.IV mortaljCan experience no otherDeath than ^-^^^^^ the Pains it luffcrs, among which the Ids cl' Honour is one of the molt touching. a. Bccaule the Tongue of Detractors is ordinarily in the holy Scripture, and efpe- Pfai. iio. ci^lly Jri PfalmSy compared to a Dart, a A. * Sword, an Arrow, and to all the Inftru- \IT' ^^' ments Men make ufe of to take away the 1 ife of Enemies ^ whereby we underlland, that Detraflors arc true Murderers, except that thefc. aim only at the Spirit&C Repu- tation, and the others at the Bodies of their Neighbours. 3. What fhews that this Sin does as much Evil as Aflliflination on many Oc- cafions i?, that there have always been an infinite Number of Perfons, who choofe rather tololc their Life, than to prclervc It, after the Lofsofthcir Credit 6C Reputa- tion. Moreover, there are others to w horn a good Name is lb neceflary, that if they lole it, they are put beyond a poiTibility of preicrving their own, and their Fami- lies Lives : Such is the Condition of Mer- chants, Tradeimen, and alnioft all the World. This made St. Chryjojlom com- pare Detractors to Man-Eaters, laying, Ai\ Porn- ^^^ ^^''^ Mouth iilfofiifi hy ahliahitng frora iiim K^\\-jhamefiil £f dcjlruBroe IVords : For "oohaif Huln 5. '^^'^^ ^^ p'ofit i/s, /f'wb/le iz)e ycfrain eating Birds and Fijbcs^ ive dc'dour and eat up our Brethren ? He that detratis^ eats DETRACTION. 83 f eats the FJeJh of his Brethren and bites Sect.1V the Flefb of bis Neighbours. What Chri- ^-•'W^. ftian wou'd not fiirink with Horror to eat a Man's Flefh ? and yet, according to St. Chryfoflom^ this is what a Detrador does. Secondly^ Detradtion is directly contrary to the eighth Commandment, fhoujhalt not Steat. Who can deny that this a true Theft ? Seeing it ravilhes from our Neigh- bour a Benefit which does not belong to the Ravifher, even his Reputation ; a thing fo precious, that Solomon ajQfures us, /'/ is better than great Riches, So that to take ^'°^'"'^- it from him is many times to do him more mifchief, than to take away his Goods and his Money. Some will fay perhaps, that Reputation is not of the nature of thefe other good Things, which we may obtain and enjoy without the helpof another • whereas Re- putation entirely depends on others, and confequently one may take it away with- out ravifhing from a Man any thing which properly belonged to him. I anfwer in a few Words ; It matters little how we en- joy a good Name • and fuppofe it be by the Judgment and Liberality of another, it is fufficient, that it was given to a Man as his own ; and if it belongs to him,we can'C take it away without being Thieves. Some may fay, that Men have not a juft Title to a good Name, and fo it may G a be 84 -^ 7reatlfe again/t SECT.TVbe taken from them without Theft. I ^'^'^^T^ anfwer, that fuppofing what fuch Men ad- vances was true, the Confequence wou'd not be juft ; bccaufc we have ftill lefs title to take this good Thing away. What further Ihews the Horror of Detraction is, That it is very likely that fomc of thofe, who makenoftickat taking away a Man's Honour, wou'd not make much Scruple to kill a Man right out, or to rob him of his worldly Goods, if he had the fame Oc- cafions. This made ^^intilian fay, That he who detracts differs not from him who does Evil, but by Occafions, Male^ dlcus a MaUfico non differ t niffOccaJione. And ZoiJus being ask'd why he took fo great a Pleafure in Detraction ? anfwer'd, Becaufe^ etro'tous as I am^ I can do no other hurt. In fine, Detraction is contrary to the NinthCommandment, "fhoujhalt not hear falfe IVitnefs againjl thy Neighbour. I own, that to take thefe Words accor- ding to the ordinary Signification, they fpeak only of falfc Witncls, Lies and Ca- lumnies. But all agree, that we ought to give a larger Extent to the Precepts ofthis Law ( fee what JESUS CHRIST fays hereupon, Matt. 5. ) and that when it fecms to forbid but one Vice, it nevcrthc- lefs condemns all thofc whicli have any re- ference to it. I don't fuppolc that we go beyond DETRACflON. 8j beyond the Intention of GOD, by faying, Sect.IV thatDetradion is comprized in thefeWoids V^'Y^^ any more than by affirming, thatCalumny and Detradion are manyTimes confounded together in various Paffages of Scripture. Still further, altho'Calumny be on fome accounts more criminal than Detradion, nevcrthelels it muft be owned, that the latter is in other regards more terrible than the former, becaufe more difficult and even impoffible to remedy. We may repair the Reputation of another, whom we have detraded from by telling the Truth, and acknowledging that the Evil we faid of him was a Lye j but we can never repair the Reputation of another, whom we have flandered, while we fpake Truth, ex- cept by Lying, that is by faying that what we related of him was not true. I may fay farther, that even this Lye will not re- ellablilh a Man's Honour. For how will it be poffible to make the World believe that to be falfe, contrary to their own Light, which we have formerly clearly fliewn to be true. Befides what we find in the divine Law which forbids Detradions, we may alio draw many Confeqaences againft it, from divers other PajQTages of theOldTeftament. David in Pfal. i, 2. ranks in theNuni- ber of thole wh ) Ihall dwell in theXaber- nacle of the Lord, him, That back-hitctb G 3 not S5 A T'reatifs againjt Sect.IV not ^ith his fonguCy nor doeth Evil to ^-^^"^^^^^ ]:is Neighbour ^ nor take th up a Reproach againjt his Neighbour, Here not only Detraction is exprcflly nan:ei, but it is further charafterized by one of it's almoft infallible Eficdts, which is to do Evil to his Neighbour, And it is principally becaufe of the Evil which it does to him, that the Holy Spirit, faying to ns by the Month of the Pfalmift, that he 'who does not back-bite floall abide in the I'aber* nacle ofGQDj teaches us, that the oppo- fite Perfon, he who does detrad, fhall not enter into thisTahernacle of Joy, ofGlory, of Holinefs and of Happinefs, in the Hea- ven where GOD dwells. This is a fuffici- cnt Proofjthat Detraction is aSin, irafmuch as it will deprive thole Perfbns of Heaven, v«r, 5, who make ufe of it and fpread it abroad. The fame David fiys to us in Pfal. loi* Wkofoever privily fandereth his Neigh" hour^ him "will I cut off. This holy Pro- phet thro' this vvhole Song, declares that he will put far from him the Wicked and Sinners, among w^hom he reckons Detrac- tors ; it then follows thatDctra^^ionisaSin. Becaufe it is a Sin, Jeremy places it in his Catalogue and among the Complaints ^^ which he made of the Crimes of the Jews. Thej are all Jiubborn^ fiys Iir, and wore than jiubborn^ and they go about fla^^dcr-^ i>ig'^ they are as Brafs and hon • they arc as Perjons^ zvbo dejiroy one another. Here DETRACTION. 87 Here I can't help obferving Three Cha- Sect.1V raders of Detradion or Detraftors • •^/'^^ I, That they are as Brafi, which makes a Noife when ftruck,ind which has fome Splendour, but which after all is but of little Worth and Value, a. They are like Iron,whichbyit'svfeightand hardnefs crufhes thofe on whom it falls. 3. That by mutual Detraaionsj they deftroyed one another. This fame Prophet ranks this Vice a- mong many others, which he fpeaks of in Chap. 5>. Take ye heed every one of his in^ ver. 4* timate Friend^ and triift ye not in any Brother ; for every Brother makes a hujl- nefs of fuppl anting^ and every intimate Friend^ ( that is, which calls himfelf fuch) goes about detra^ing, Truft not to any Brother^t\^zx^ how you let him into your Secrets, left he make ufe of your Frank- nels and fupplant you, and when you have difcovered your own Defeats, he back-bite you. Since then this Prophet ranks De- traction among Sins, it is certainly a Sin in it felf. ARTICLE ///. Detraction proved to he a Sin by Pafages taken from the New-Teftamcnc. I. r^UR Lord JESUS CHRIST ranks ^^ Detradions among thofe evilThings G ± which fi8 ^ T'reatife againft Sect.IV which proceed from the Heart, and defile ^^*^^^ the Man ^ and he diftiuguilhcs them from fs*"^.' ^^' Calumnies, which he nmics fal/e jyitne/- fes. If then Detradions defile a Man, they are coufequently Sins. He fpeaks olthem in the pluralNumber, that lb he may com- prehend all forts of them. yer.19,30. ^^ St. Paul in Rom. ch. i. relating the Sins in which the Heathen were plunged, joins DctratSions with their other Excelles, anddiftinguifhes between fimple Detractors andCalumniators, whom he cMs Invejjfers of Evils or evil Things. The Apoftlc joins this Sin with others that are fo hor- rible, that we can't doubt but it is very abominable before GOD. In fuch a Com- pany, it muft be very deteftable. 3. The fame holy Man in i Cof\ ch. 5. makes it plain to us. That it is a frightful Sin, feeing he forbids us even to eat with fach as arc charged with it, and orders them to be excommunicated the Body of the Church, as Perfons who do not dcfcrve to be found among Believers. How empty would our Churches be now-a-days, if all Dctraftors were caft out of them ! But alfo how much more agrcablc wou'd our AfFcmbliesbe to GOD ! vcV/u^' I^ ^^^^s fame Epiftle, he ranks nmong thofc who fliall not inherit the Kingdom of GOD, Rev/lerSy whom he reckons among Uic gicatclt Sinncr;>. But becaufe fome perhaps DEfRjiCriON. ^9 perhaps might flatter themfelves, either Sect.IV that thefe Sins were inconfiderable, or that ^-^"^^"^ GOD wou*d eafily pardon them, He fays, Be not: deceived^ all thoie who commit them fliall not enter into the Kingdom of Heaven, which fhews at the fame Time the infalhble Chaftifement and the Enor- mity of the Sins. And in the nth ofyeria.. his fecond Epiftle to the Corinthians he fears, that Detraftion will be among the Sins to be found with them. 5. In Phil 4. He exhorts them to think ver. s. on things that are lovely and of good Re^ port^ and uohere there is an]} Virtue and Praife. And herein he exhorts them to flee Detradion, which has nothing lovely in it, and which is a Sin, as has been al- ready ftievvn, far from being a Virtue, and which is fo far from being a Thing of good Report, that it takes away the good Name of a Neighbour and of all thofe who do detraft ; which in a word, is fo far from having any Praife, as that it is bufied in blaming others, and making it felf blameable j Detractors and Detradted being fo. 6. The fame Apoftle in his Epiftle to the Romans^ ch.12. commands us to "prefer ver. ro; one another in honour. We ought not then to back-bite one another, feeing De*- trattion tends only to the ftiamc and igno- miny of our Neighbours, far from contri- buting vcr. i« ycr. i^. ^ yl freatlfe agalnll Sect.IV bating to their Honour. What can be ^<-^^>^^*^ more oppofitc than ttie Apoflle's Precepts to the Pradice of Detractors ! ch:ip 5. 7' The fame Apoftle in 2 7/w. reckons Detraction among the horrible Sins which fhall reign in the laft Days. Men^ fays he, /ball be lovers of themfelves^ vain^p'oud^ defamers^ Kq, , 8. In I Cor, 6. He fays, Our Bodies are the fem'ples of the holy Spirit, Our Mouth is a part of our Body ; if then we defile our Mouth by Detradion ( as has been already flievvn that we do ) it follows that thereby we defile the Temple of the holy Ghoft, which cannot pafs for a Sin that is light and of little importance. 5). St.Peter reckons evil-fpealcing among I Pet. i.i. the things we are to lay afide, that is to fay, among Sins, ARTICLE IK That fomc of the particular Jlays of detraSiing are Sins. WE could doubtlcfs jnakc fcparate Treatifes on the different Ways of detracting, which we are about to mention under this Article ^ each of them affording i'ufficient Matter for a Volume j but aa wc DETRJCflON. ^i we fiiall ftick to the whole, rather than to Sect.1V, it's parts, we fhall be very brief with re- "^^^""^^^^ fped to Stories, Railleries and Reproaches. Of sroRiEs. Stories^ as has been already fhewnjuare, one kind of Detradion, or one way of detrafting. It is no lefs true, that Stories whofeDefign generally is to fowDivifions, are very great Sins againft Charity, and oftentimes againft the Fidelity, which we owe to thole who have trailed their Se- crets with us ; a Fidelity that vve violate every Time we reveal and relate them. Solomon has Ihown, That Story-tellers, at leaft thofe who reveal Secrets, fin againft Fidelity, when he oppofes them to thofe who poffefs this Virtue, yi tale-bearer Prov. if^ revealeih Secret s^hut he that is of a faith* ^^• Sprit concealeth the Matter. When St. }^aul reckons up the capital Sins of the Pagans, he counts their having been Back-biters^ 2iS0Vit ; and adds, ?7:^^/Rom.i.3oj they themfelves knew the Judgment of GODj viz. that they who do fuch things are worthy of Death. Which I think fufficiently proves, that thefe Stories are i^mful. Of RAILLERn Z)^<:?/i declares the Man happy who has- notfet in the Seat of ^corner spx Raikrs. ^'^'^' ^' ^* UnhaDDy ^ ^ / ^2 A freatife againd Sect. IV Unhappy then and criminal are they who ^^ ' have fat therein. Solomon fays, that He who mocketh the Poor^ reproacheth his Maker '^ GOD, who is the Maker of the Railer, and him that is mocked. Conle- quently, it is a Crime no lefs than high Treaibn againft the Divinity. He fays likewife that Judgme?its are 'prepared ^^^'^'^'^^^ for Mockers. Likewife 7/2?/^/? fays, that the fcornfuljhall be conjnmed. It is need- lefs to add any more like Paffages. Of OUfRJGESi^ REPROACHES. Thefe are expreflly condemned in the Law of GOD. In the Prophet Zepha^ Ch.i. 8,9- niah we have an evident Proof, that In- vectives, thofe Injuries in Words, are Sins, inafmuch as GOD refolves that he will punifh the People of Moab and the Chil- dren of Ammon^ becaufe they by thefc means had defamed the Jeizs^ and affures them, that he will raze their Cities fo that ' there ftiall not be any Maiks of them left. Moreover, theScripture requires the wick- ed to forfake his way, and the injurious Man his Tho'ts. Oar Saviour himfclf de- clares to the Jews that whojhever JJjall Jay to his Brother^ Raca^jballbe in dan- Muth. %:ger of the Council ; but wbofocccr Jhall ^'* Jay\ "thou Fool^ Jhall be in danger of Hcll-Fire. Interpreters are very much divided Ifa.5?. 7. D ETR ACri ON. 9i divided about the fignificatlon ot the word Sect.IV Raca ; Ibme pretend that itmeans agrofs V^VN^i Injury pothers, a lefs Injury than the word Fool J others again, that by an Interjeftion it marks the Wrath and Indignation of him that fpeaks it : But however this be, they muft all own, That it marks theContempt and Wrath of him that utters it on Ac- count of the Faults or Wickednefs of him to whom he addreffeshimfelf; and that by an allufion to the different Tribunals of the Jews, CHRIST ishere fpeakingof the Judgments of GOD. ARTICLE K DetraBion Is contrary to Charity. T T will be very cafy to fliew this oppo- '■' fition by running the Comparifon be- tween what St. Paul fays of Charity, and the Nature of Detradion. Charity is of ^^^^ ^^ a patient Spirit^ quite contrary to thelm- is» patience of Detradlors, who can't bear the Defects of others. Charity is i^i/^^where- as Detradion is cruel, and does irreparable evil to thofe whom it falls upon. Charity is not envious^ but Detraftion has Envy many Times for it*s Source, as has been before ftiewn. Charity "vaunteth not it p4 -^ Treatifd cigatnjl Sect.IV/J^/^ Dctraftion on many occafions is info- lent to the highcil Degree. Charity is ?iol: ptijU'ed up^ Detradion is frequently a conlequcnt of Pride. Charity dues not behave it felf t!nfeeml)\ Detradion tar- nilhe:stheHonour of our Neighbours. C/?^- rtty jccks fiot her oisjti^ Detraftionfeeks noihing but it's own at others Coft. Cha^ rity is not eaftly pro'voledy Detraction is often the Effect of Spleen and Anger. Cha^ rity thinks no evil^ Detradion neceifarily thinks thereof^ nay, it wou'd rot be De- tradion, if it did not think of evil, to re- late it afterward. Charity rejoices not in iniquity^ Detradion does^ and truly if Men were troubled attheSorrows&Faults of others, they would hide them, far from difcovering them. Charity eaftly he lic-ces the good uoe fay of Per Jons ^ but Detradi- on eafily believes the ill that is laid of them. Charity hopes for the Corrjerfon and Change cfSinners^and in this hope oj fu^ ture amendment hides prejent Faults^ but Detradion hopes for no good from them, and difparages them, looking upon their prcfent State as that they mult be in all their lives long. In a word, Charity endures all things^ it eafly bears the hardens of others^ but Detradion v/ill en- dure nothing, and never fhcws any Com- fort to others. It will not cxcule any thing, nnd haftens Revenge with the iit- moft Rigour. This <3jl- 6. 1. DET'RACriON. 95 This Parallel is pretty long ; but there Sect.IV, is this good in it, that it ferves to Ihew, ^.^^TnA how Detradion is a great Sin, feeing no- thing is fo ftrongly recommended as it's Op- pofite, Charity, which is not only an a- bridgment of the Law and the Prophets, but ev^n of theGofpel. And here it muft be obferved, that when the Scripture or- ders us to be charitable, it condemns De- traction two ways, i. In that it orders us to contribute to the good of others, which we do not by Detradion. i. It forbids us doing any hurt to others ; now it is cer- tain, that we do them a very greatDamage, in taking away fo precious a thing as their Honour. Thus it is a Sin of Commiffion and Omiffion. Befides what I have faid, here is a reafoning which fufHciently proves that Detradion is contrary to Charity, Charity teaches us, that we ought to pray to GOD for our Brethren • but what Hate is a Man in to ask of GOD Profperity for them, if he is endeavouring to take from them the deareft thing they have ? Charity requires us to affift the Poor ; but how can we give them an Alms, if we refufe them our Silence which cofts nothing / Charity requires us to comfort Men under Afflic- tions ^ but how can we do that, if we cuf felves are the Authors of their Afflidions? Can a Fountain at the fame Time fend forth bitter Waters and fweet ? No verily, jam.j. if- AU ^ p6 A freatife againii Sect.IV All thofc PafTages then which recommend ^'^"''^'^ Charity to us, do condemn Detraction, which is ftill contrary to the Charity we owe our Neighbours inmany other Ways ; the fpeaking of which we fhall referve till we come to treat of the Effects of Detiadtion. ARTICLE ri. DetraHion is contrary to Jujiice^ and therefore a Sin. TT Aving already fhewn that Detradion "*■-*• is contrary to Charity, that were al- moft fufficient to make us conclude, that it is contrary to Juftice, for JESUS CHRIST has recommended Charity to us as a jujt thing • and truly is it not a^*///? thing that we fliould Love one another,as he has loved us, an ancient Father looked upon thisCharity as a thing due • of which he faid, that it was a Debt we can never be diicharged from. Befidcs, it is very certain and evident, that Detraction Itrikes diredtly at this Pre- cept, which is Natural as well as Evan- Mit. 7.ii. g^'lical, to do to others as we wou'd that they ihou'd do unto us. What more clear than this? This Principle is fo fclf evident that VEfRjlCriOK ^y that it wont permit, nor does it need any Sect.IVj reafonings to prove it. Now where is V.-OTM the Man who wou'd be very eafy and willing to be fpoken ill of ? Doubtlels there is no one who would, there being none but what choofe to preferve their Honour and Reputation. But if there are fomc who fay they Ihould not be troubled if the World did fpeak ill of them • they do not then talk ferioufly, at leaft they don't Mind what they fay ; and would they confult them- felves, they would find and acknowledge, that this is too repugnant to theLove they naturally bear themfelves^not to be offended w^ith thofe who take away what moftly flatters Intereft and Self-Love. Upon this Principle engraved on the ^^/^ 7^^/^J i Cqr.3.ti of the Hearts of all Men, it is, That our Lord has eftabliftied his Commandment of loving others as we love our felves. This Principle then muft be very true, feeing GOD has built upon it. This Principle,! fdy, of doing to others as wc dcfire they may do to us, is more fure than all the Demonftrations of Geometry^ being efta- bliftied, explained and commanded by a GOD, who can neither be deceived nor deceive others. This is the Weight and the Meafure to which all others muft be conformed, otherwife they are falfe Rules, falfe Weights and falfe Ballances,which are ^f^y^,ni' H con- p8 A Treatiji againjt Sect. IV contrary tojuflice &: aboniinable to GOD, '^^v^ Since then iJctraclionislo oppofitc both to the Laws of Nature 6C thole ot the GolpeJ, I joh. 3,4- it lollows that it is a Sin, jor Sin is thai: whicb is contrary to the Law. It is alio contrary to that mutual, tho' tacit, En- gagement Men enter into, when they are lormcd into civil Societies, of lliccouring aixl being helpful to each other recipro- cally. But to tear each other to pieces, ^lO\v is this helping and luccouiing each other ? Detraction then is a Violation of this Engagement, and ccnfequentlv an Aft I Cor,6 9- of Injuitice, and t be Unrighteous Jhall not Inherit the Kingdom of G D, Learned Men have for along Time dilputed, and perhaps yet a great while will difpute, whether tlie Poundation and Rule of Juf- ticc ought to be the Profit of Society, or of our Itlves, or the Authority of the Laws given us by GOD. Without en- tring into their Differences, I fay that the arguinsfs of all, whatever they be, make agamil Detraction, w hich is contrary to the divine Laws, many Times to Sclf-In- tercii, and the gov;d of Society, as we fliail hcrcaltcr fiiew. ARTICLE D Et R A C T 10 K 99 ARTICLE FIT. Sect.IV, DetraBion is contrary to the y^t tributes ofGODy and is a CharaB^roffha JDeviL i I. T T is repugnant to that which makes -■- the Effence of the adorable Being. GOD is Love J fays, St. ^^^ A//, whereas ^ J°^* *-^^ Detradion is a Defed of Love. GOD is unwilling that any fhould perilhy but had ^^^^ ^. rather that all jhouldcometoRe'pentancc^ * Detradors on the contrary endeavour to deftroy others, as far 4s they can, and feem even to fear theRepentanceof thofe whomt they accufe. 2. This Sin is oppofite to the Ways o£ his Wifdom, who fecms to let before ouE Eyes the Defefts of others, tp teach us to know our felves ; to fhevvus theDeformity of Vices io others, that fo we may avoid them. But if their Imperfedions make us Detractors, this is a going direftly con- trary to the Defign of G O D 5 for then we fee them without correding them in our felves, which if we did, wc ihould re- frain fpeaking ill of them. His Wifdom alfo permits Sin, to hum- ^ ble thofe who behold it in others as in a Mirrour, by confidering, that it is the Frailty of humane Nature. But far from Ha this, ICO A freatije againji SicT.IV this, Detraclorsdo from thence take mat- ^^^'V'^^ ter of Pride,and a Subjed for raifing them- lelves above ihcir Neighbours. 3. Detraftion makes a Breach as I may fay, in the Omnipotence of GOD. To backbite others and judge them, is to en- croach upon the Legiflator himfelf. The Sinner has his Judge, who will at the lafl levcal his Crimes, if he pcrfifl in them, and thereupon render a Judgment confoi- « ,. ,. mable to his Law, But now to go about to expole and make known to thisWorld thofe things which GOD has referved for the next, is to encroach upon the Rights cf GOD and to anticipate the Time. To him alone are Men to give up an Account ©f their Conduct, at leaf^ in a great many Cafes. To difcover it then to the Pub- lick, as if it w^as to them, Men were ac- countable, is to place one's fclf in GOD's ftead. On this Account it was that S. jan:cs3.i. J^mcs faid. Be not many Miifters^ hno^w- jf'w'.V-u.^^c? that ye jhall recei'-^e the greaterCo?;* demnatioih 4. This Vice does Violence to GOD's Juttice, His Prerogative it is to render to every one according to hisWoiks. Par- ticular Pcrfons then ought not here to render what belongs toGOD alone. When fome have done ill Adions, 'tis not for o- thers to cover them with tlie fliame and ignominy^ which anlwcr the Filthincls of their DETR ACTION. loi their deed. To GOD this Right belong?, Sict.IV . If then Vertue confifts in following and ^-^"v-*v^* imitating the divinePcrfedions, it is a Vice, a Sin, diredly to clafli with them, as te- trad ion does. On the other Hand, As much as diahoh*- cal Vices are different from divine Perfec- tions, fo much do Detraftors refemble the infernal Being. Who can doubt hereof, if it be true, that the Scripture attributes to him thofe Charafters, which perfedly fuit Detradors ? Of him the Scripture fay, fhat he is an Accufer of the Brethren ? i^p^r"/.g? Him the Scripture affirm to be as a roar-- ing LyoUy fee king ijohom he may devour. And is not this the Condufl: of the others, who are continually feeking thofe whole Reputation they may tear in pieces ? Nay, we may fay that in fome lort, Detraftors are worfe than the very Devils themfelves, who do not endeavour to overthrow their own K'n^dom, as Men endeavour to ruin one another by their Difcourfe, A Man need not be a Philofopher to draw the Confequence of this Conformity between Detradors and Satan, even, that they are Sinners as he is^ and Ihall partake of his Punifhments. H 3 ARTICLE 101 A freatife agatnfi sect.iv. article vul Detraftion is contrary to the Deftgn of GOD /// giving us the Faculty of Speech. jTT I S paft doubt, That GOD's Dcflgn -■■ in creatirgMan, was, that he might receive Benedictions and Praifes therein. Now there is no Means lb agreable hereto as Man's Speech, which may contribute as much hereto, as a Creature is able by his Difcourle and Thanksgivings. For this Col. 5. 16. Caule St. Paul requires of us to have con- tinually in our Mouths Pfalms &C Hymns, which are the fame Things according to the Hebrew Etymology. Hence alio it was, that He who compofed lb great a i^sumber of them by the Infpiration of the holy Ghoft, with Inch an holy Eloquence cry'd out, yiwahe my G lory ^ I njoillpraije thee O Lord among the People ; / will ^.^*'' ""^'^ fng unto thee among the Nations. And again, / will hlefs the Lord at all timcs^ K«i.34, 1. /;/j Praife fiall be continuall]} in my Mouth. In a Word, hence it was, that the Hcb.13 ij. holy Apollle Paul exhorted the Hebrews, to offer untoGOD the Fruit oftbetrLips^ lum. 3 ^ and that S. Jamcs^ faid, with the tongue we blcfs GOD. But 'the Ufe Detradors make of their Moutiis is quite different herefrom, and directly D E r R J[ Cf I O N. to3 dire6lly contrary to GOD's Deiign j finccSECT.lV. they are lb far from praifing and honouring ^-"^'"^ him, as that they Sin againft his Prohibi- tions to Detraction, and thereby caule his Name to be blalphemed among Men. A fecond Defign of GOD's allowing Men the Faculty of Speech, was, that it might be employed for their mutual help and edification. For this Reafon it is, that we are created in fuch a ftate, as that we ftand in very great need of each others Succour and Advice, whether in Matters of Piety, or in Affairs of civil Life. As to Religion, it is GOD's Will, that there fliould be Men more enlightned and more knowing than others, to inftriid them in the Duties of Piety by publick and pri- vateDifcourfes. And with regard to civil Affairs, he has judged it meet, that they be in abfolute need one of another, and that by the mean of Speech they commu- nicate to each other their Neceffities, that io they may maintain that Union among themfelves, which he would have found ftiHong all Men. Had it been his Plea- furc, he could have created Men as the Fowls of the Air, and Beafts of the Field, who without each others help, can fatisfy their own needs : But as it v/as not hi$ Pleafure to bellow this Advantage onMan, he has recompenccd him by another,which is to demand of one another, what is nc- H 4 ceffAry f 04 A freatife aga'wjl Sp^TjV.ceflary for them, and to be made happy in- demanding, in giving and in receiving it, by their Communication and their Union, which contributes to the general good of the Society and to the private Advantage of every one of its Members, fo that Men go contrary to thelntention of thcirCrea- tor, when initead of improving the Gift of Speecli to their help, they on the con- trary make ufe thereof as Detraftors do to annoy and deftroy each other • when inftead of faftning the Ties of Concord among themfelves, they difunite them. If then the right ufe of Speech be fo necef- fary and rcquifite to the Ends of GOD, the ill Xj'it which by Detraction is made of it, is contrary wife oppofitc to thcfe fame Ends, and a very great Sin, inafmuch as the Corruption of the beft things is the vvorft. ARTICLE IX. Dctraftion is oppofte to humane Civility. "pErhaps Rcafons drawn from worldly '*' Rules Diay make an Jmpreilion on Worldlings. To fuch we then fay, that Detraction on many Occafions is very con- trary to Civility and Politcnefs. lor DEfRJCflON. los For a Proof of this, I fhall makeSEcr.IV ufe of the very Words of S. Cbryjofiom ^^^^^'^ who fpeaking of Detractors fays, W'hat Pardon^ ivhat Excuje pall we have^ if we negUB thinking on our own Affairs^ and curioujly pry into thofe of other Men^ As it wou'd be a very unmannerly^ un» genteel A^ ion for a traveller to enter a Houfey and furvey all that is there- in^fo it is a Mark oj extreme Incivilt^y and of a Clowni/h fellow^ for any one to meddle with the Life of another. 2. All the World agree, That Injuries, InveSives and fcurrilous Expreffions come only from the Rabble and Scum of a Peo- ple ; fuch as have no Education, and who are ignorant even of the Principles of Ho- nour, Decency and Civility. But are not thefe Invcaives more excufable, when they are not made in Prcfence of thofe they aini at ? Not at all* This wc Ihall fhew in the following Article. ARTICLE X Detradion is a mean vile Sin. 1. T T is certain, that all Mankind, efpe- •*• cially Men of Education SC Honour, dcfpifc Traitors and look upon them as the jo6 A Treatife againfi SscT.IV the meancft of Men. But Detraftors are ^'^^r^^ truly Traitors, when they attack their Enemies behind, and when they are in no Capacity to defend thcmfelvcs • lb that the lame Contempt that falls upon Trai- tors, falls equally upon Detractors. 2. Wc may compare Detractors to the meancft and moft abjed things in Nature. They arc like thofe Worms which glifter only in the Night. For this Reafon they wou'd office the good Name of theirNeigh- bours, they wou'd caft Shades upon it, that by the help of thefe Shades they may fhcw themlelves to better Advantage : Whereas a true Diamond^ Iparkles in the Blaze of the Sun, and needs not the Help of Dark- nels to be known. 3. Detractors may be compared to Apes, who a6t what they fee in others. So De- tractors relate the Evil they hear Ipoken of, or fee done by their Neighbours. And truly no Animal approaches lb near to a Man as an Ape ; but the Man who refcm- bles an Ape, approaches terribly near to a Beaft. 4. They may be likened to barking and biting Dogs, who feed upen itinking and infeding Carrion, and Ravens and ra- venous Beafts for the lame Realbn. 5. To Hogs, who trample Gold and Pearls under foot, and chuic Dirt and Fil- ^'' ^'^^thincfs for their Nourilhmcnt, and Vipers which kill Men with their Tongue, 6. V E T R 4 G r I O N. 107 6. To thofe Infcds which arc bred, aiKlSECT.IV do live only in ftinking^ corrupted Water, j;;Qf^ becaufe Detradion owes it's Birth and con- tinuance inBeing, to the Depravity and Corruption of a Neighbour's Manner?. A Bee which is nourifhed with odpriferous Herbs and Flowers, produces agreable Honey ;( if he flings he dies for it.) But a Perfon who is nouriflied, and whole Spi- rit is fed with the Ordures of Sin, cannot but produce rotten Fruits of Sin. 7. Detractors are like fierce and favagc Beafts. Hence it was that Diogenes being asked, 0/ "what Bead the bite was mofi venemous and dangerous^^nfwcvcdj Among favage Bea/is, the DetraHors j and among domejiick^ the Flatterers. This Ihews us at the fame Time, That the wi- feft among the Heathen, altho' they had only the Light of a Nature for a Guide, condemned thisYice. And truly one fhall hardly ever meet with any thing finer hereupon than the Principles and Senti- ments of Chiton^ one of the fcven wife Men of Grace^ which a Modern thus de- fcribes, He reckoned among the ^alities of a wife Man^ thofe he himfelfpjjefi j even to defpife Injuries and DetrattionSy and to refrain from them^ to knew him* felf and to be upon his Guard :^ not to in- fult the Miferable • to fupprefs his An-- gcry and to be moderate in hisSentiments. io8 A Treatife againd SrctIV. And it is fo true, Tha Detraftion is a Sin that alJ Mankind allow it fo to bc,atlcaft in feme degree. This Univerfality is a ftrong Proof, or at leaft, a great Preju- dice againft Dctraftion, For it is impoiTi- ble, That all fhould agree to be miftaken, to deceive themfelves, and to eftablifli an Error in the World. It is alfo fo true,That Detraftion is univerfally accounted a Vice, as that no one is willing to pafs for a De- trador. Yea when a Man does actually backbite, he is unwilling to be tho't fo to do. And there is no Man among thofe who are moft given to Dctraftion, but wou'd think you did him an Injury,niould you call him a Detraftor. There is no Perfon but condemns Detraftion, when it blafts his own Reputation. And pray, is itlefscondemnable when it blafts another's? No indeed. Why does a Man blame it more when it attacks himfelf, than when it attacks another ? Truly becaufe theLofs of his own Honour is more fcnfible, than the Damage done to others. But in reality this alters not the Thing : It's Nature is ever the fame. A R T I C L E X/. DctraBors arc ordinarily more faulty than thofe they talk of. i.TT many Times happens that a Man * will tcU of an ill Adion a hundred Timcs^ DE'tjiRCnON. I op Times, which has been done but once. Sect.IV. Hereby he Sins more than the Perfon who committed the Deed, yea Ninety nine Times more, according to my Suppofition. I don't enquire at prefent, whether the Sin talked of be greater than Detradion. It may doubtlels be either greater or lels* But if Sins are to be meafured, as indeed they ought, by the repeated Ads of Com- miffion, it is, clear, that he, who backbites a Perfon an hundred Times, on account of a Sin but once committed, is more faulty than the other. Thefe Men are like thofe Echoes which repeat a Word many Times, that has been but once Ipoken. 2. I liippofe, as is very poffibJe, that the Defeds we reprehend, may be more light, more fecret, and may have fewer ag- gravatingCircumftanccsthanDetradion,and then certainly Dctradion is more criminal than fuch. It is frequently feen, that the Sins and Vices we blame in others, and which we fpread abroad, arc nothing near fo great as Detradion. 3. "Tis the common Pradicc of Detrac- tors to fpcak ill not of afingle Perfon on- ly, but of many Hundreds. They blame the Manners and Condud of many. But now every Perfon does not commit a Sin fo many times. For Example, A Perfon has committed an Ad of Injuftice; but a Dctraitoi will publifti the Injiifticcofone "^ Man, 1 1 A Treatife againjl Sect.1V Man, the Lying of another, iheLoofencfs ^""^"^^"^ of a third, 6Cc. Thofe who arc I'poken ill of, have only their own Defcds to anfwer ior, but the Detractor is relponfihle for the iJck'cts of Thoulands, inalmuch as he has fpakc ill of io many. Thus all the Sins of others become his own, and it fhall be- fall him, as it did the Vidims lacrificed under the Law, upon which the People ^^ . laid their Sins, by putting their hands on theVidim's Head,wh6 Was aftervrard flain. The DiflFerence is, Detradors bring Death on themfclvcs voluntarily, whereas the Beaft facrificed was not the Caufe of his • and alfo the People laid on him their I- jiiquities, whereas Detractors bring the Faults of others on themfelvcs of their own will. 4. It frequently happens, that Detrac- tors will relate more Sins in one or two Hours, tifan the Perfons reproached have committed in one or two Years. Is it not evident that Ids Time is needed to tell a thinrr than to execute it ? Is it not likewifc certain, that the cliiicrcnt thing we relate ia one Hour, mull require fometimes many Years to have been tranfatted in ? Do we not fee Perfons, who \\\ a very jhort Space of Time, have fcan'd and examined the Life of others from their Infancy to their old Age. ARTICLE DEfRjiCriON. Ill ARTICLE XTI. Sect.1V fhe Greatnefs of this Sin^Jhewn byfome further Conjidcrations. I. /^ NE and the fame Sin Ibmevvhat ^^ differently related, by feveral Per- fons, yea even without any difference, but at various Times, will make a Man eafily believe, that they are really new Sins, ad- ded to thofe he had before heard of- which confequently mull ftill farther hurt our neighbour's Reputation. Thus we afford ground for a fort of Calumny, by giving Occafion to makeFolks believe ourNeigti- bour worfe than he really is, and by laying more Faults to his Charge, than he has really committed. A great Sin this is, which Detraftors lye open to, by giving Occalion thro' their Difcourfe, to Judg- ments fo prejudicial to a Man'sReputation I 'Tis not perhaps one lingle Peifon who gives fuch Occafion, but many together, and thereby all become Partakers in the Crime. 2. He who dffcovers a Thing to ano- ther, is in fome manner refponfible for all the Additions, which this fecond Pcrfon may make to the Story ^ and thus he is blameable with that fort of Calumny, which gives occafion for thofe who lafl hear the matter, to thinjc all true, which Others haye bcfQxe added to the Matter of ^" -- Fa6t, 112 \A Jreat'tj'e againfi Sect.1V Fad, and for all which they put thereto of their own. The Fault it felf was at liift very fniall, but it has grown large by pafFing thro' fo many Mouths, as a River, ivhicli fwells as it glides along thio' many Countries, by theRivulets it receives in its Courfc.'Tis wcllknown,that a good or abad Name, far from wafting & lofing its Strength by carrying, does on the contrary acquire new Strength. Thus we ordinarily fee, that a Fault which in its original and na- ture was almoft nothing, appears an enor- mous and a frightfulCrimc,alter it has been fpread abroad, and related many Times : and that an Indifcreet or Inadvertant Ac- tion has appeared an unpaxdonable thing by thclc means. 3. Tis a kind of Calumny,to fay things that are falle, or mixt of Truth Sc Falfity, altho' we relate only what other Dctrac- tois have told us for things entirely true. For en the one hand, it is a Calumny, to impute thole Blots to a Neighbour, who is Irce fiom them ; and on the otiier hand, a Detractor, whether he be the firft Au- thor ot the Detraction or not, is anfwera- ble for all the Wiong that accrues to bis Neighbour thereby. Thus the Fear of doing them fo great Injury and of being ones felf a Liar, flTtould make Detraction hatclul. 4. It DEfRACriOK 113 4. It is but too common, that this SinSEcr.IV. is followed with Lying and fallc Oaths* When we reproach a Detraftor to hisFace with what he has faid, he will make no Difficulty ( I Ipeak of agrcatPart of them) to deny, that he ever Ipake diladvanta- gcoufly of us, that thereby he may avoid our Reproaches and get covered from our reientments ; and if it be needful, he will fwear he never fpake in luch a manner. And truly, is it likely that he, who did not tear offending GOD by Detradion, ftiould fear finning againtt him by Lies and Oaths ? Many Authors fpeaking of Detraftion,^ quote the Verfes which S, Aujlin WTOtc on his Table, againft thole who were in- clined to this Sin. We iliall give them in Latin, in French and in Englifii. ^ifquis amat di£iis Abfentum rodere {famam^ Hanc menfam vetHam mverit ejfc ftbu In French thus explained, ^jie ^liconque aime des Abjens A dechirer Vhonneur ^ar dos mots o^ch-* ( f^ns, Et ^uiconque les de^creditey A'^renne que pur lui ma Tabic efi infer*^ ( ^^'^^ In En2:lilh, Whoe'er delights theAbjentsfametQ hurfy tar fi om my fahU let the Wretch depart. I With 114 ^ Treatife againjt Sect.1V With good Reafon did he place this >'^^^^^^ Advertifcment on his Table, Dctraftion being oneDifh generally at ateaft. There \vc are for diverting the Mind as theBody is refrefhed and nourilhed • but what is more criminal than, with our Tongues to offend that GOD whom we ought to t Cor. 10. glorify whether "we eat or drink^ at S. 35- Paulhd^ taught us .^ ARTICLE XI L JVc arc not "well anoare of the great-- nefs of this Sin. TT7HAT we have already faid with ^^ reference to Detradion, proves, that it is a very great Vice, a very conCderablc Sin, feeing it violates all the fecond Table of the Law, which our Lord confines to having our Neighbour as our felves^ af- ter the fame manner that he has abridged all the Commandments of the firft Table to loving GOD with all our Heart and with all our Strength. S. Paul follow- ing this Example fay?, Love is the fuU filling of the Law^ which does no Evil to RorriT? our Neighbour. He then that byDctrac- tions fails of Love, and docs Evil to his Neighbour, fulfills not the Law of GOD, and VETRJCTJON. 11^ and confequently Sinr. NotwithftandingSEcrjy all this, it is too certcLin, ihat the greateit ^^'Wfi Part of the World are not Itill well aware that this Sin is fo great. We may lee e- ven that tholejWho have made confiderable Progrefs in Piety, and who groan to fee Corruption reign with fuch an high Hand as it does, will yet back-bite without al- moft any Scruple or Remorfe. Whence can this be, unlefs that they don't believe it is fuch a terrible Sin as in reality it is ? This Error is doubtlefs greatly upheld by the loofe Maxims of fome Cafuitts, who authorife Theft, Murder and Detradion, by holding, that the Good "which is founA in T'em^oral things ^ is fo Jlender^ and of fo little Confequence for Heaven^ that i^ is of no Confederation before GOD ani his faints. We have already fhewn, that Reputation is no fmall Benefit, and we Ihall Hill further Prove it, and that the taking this Benefit away ftirs Men up toi Revenge and Hatred againft the Robber, which things are very prejudicial to theic Salvation : and we have laftly Ihewn, that GOD forbids Men thus to hurt others, and that thus this Sin is of great Gonfideratioa before GOD. There are others of thefc Cafuifts, oa^ rather Corrupters of Morality, who have faid in cxprefs Terms, that DetraBion is not a mortal Sin^when tkePerfon 4^trac^ I 2 ied ,1^ A Treat Ife againii SicT.lV ted is really ijile. An Opinion, which s>y^\r^ has neither Proof nor Foundation inScrip- turc. But feme will doubtlefs fay, that ifDc-. traftion be fo great a Sin, and capable of excluding Heaven, there would be hardly any one faved, few Pcrfons being exempt therefrom. I own there are but few ia- vcd compared with thofe who perifli. So j^^ ^^ Chrift taught us, faying, many are called^ 14, * ' hut few are chojen : 1 hat theH'ay "which Mat.7,135 /^^^c to Life is firait^ and few there be that find tt : That thofe who with the Generality of Men, enter at the widi Gate^ and abandon thcmfelves to Detrac- tion, fliall be deprived of Paradife. I fay, fecondly,that we hope thatGOD w illlhew fuch Favour to many w ho are Detractors, as that they will abandon this Sin, and be converted. The Ufes of this SeHion. WE fhall fay here wliat we have al- ready faid,that the Rcafons we have allcdged fhould make us entirely quit this Sin. As we have let thefe Rer.fons in a very great Light, and by n>ary cogent Aignnients fhewn the Great ncfs and E- r.orniity of Detra(Sion, wc would very ftrongly exhort you to fiv it, aiJ avoid the DEfRACriON. 117 the very Appearance thereof. Let us Sbct.IV confider in bow many Ways and by how |xJJJp^ many Laws it is condemned ; by the moft pare Law of Nature, by the moft upright Law of Mofis, and by the moft clear Law of the Gofpel, which all equally enter an Adion againft us, fo that if we appeal from the Judgment of the one to that of the other, we ever lofe the Cafe, for the Law of Grace it lelf moft ftrongly condemns Detradion and Detradors. W«l>.if,r7, How then fhall we avoid fo great, fo ter- rible a Judgment, and whofe Gonfcquents are fo awful ? Detradors Ihall fuffer the Pains due to Injuftice, the Pains due to Want of Love, the Pains due to Murder and Theft ; feeing Detradion partakes of all thefc Sins. But if each of thefe Pains in particular be fo terrible, how great muft be the Torments of that Punilhment, where they fliall all meet together ! DetradJion offaces the Image of GOD in us, and inftead thereof fets up the Image of Satan. They who arc marked with this Stamo, and who bear this Image, belong to him, and he will one Day take Poffcf-* fion of them, even as the Coin which bears Mat i^.io the Prince's Image belongs infome refpeds to the Prince, as our Lord told his Temp- ters. Let us then take heed, how we re- ceive in us the Impjreffion which gives this evil Spirit the Right of Sovereignty and I 3 Death « 1 S A Treatife againjl Sect. IV Death over thofe in whom it Is found. If '^^^>r^ Detraftion makes us equal to what is moft wicked, to the Principle of Wickcdnefs, yea to Wickednefs itlelf, it does alfo ren- der us like to what is moft filthy 6c loath- Ibme among Brutes; it makes us, as 1 may fay, twice Bealls. Tnis is what was evin- ced when 'twas once fhewn to what fort of Beafts Detractors might juftly be com- ^ pared. Happy were Detractors, if their Souls, as thole of Beafts, died with their Bodies ! If after they had been transformed into Beafts, Beafts might be transformed into Men, they w ould reproach Men with a Barbarity w hich they were ftrangers to, and might fay to them, we wou'd rot have done to Creatures of our own Species, as you have done; and you are far more cruel than we ! Let the very Afles reprove Numb. 11. Balaam'^ wlicn thefc are gcing to Curfe People. The Ufe of Speech is doubtlefs a great Gift of Heaven, but it had been much bet- ter for us that we had never received it, if GOD had not given us the Ule of Rcafon to govern and rule our Tongue, which without this wou'd be the Inftrument of our grcateft Evils. But do Men make Uic of their Rcafon, when they defrad ? Rcafon requires^ that we ihould blcfs him who has lb liberally diftinguift^ed us from Other living Creatures. But this is not all. Tho' lo, D E f R A C r 10 N. 119 Tho' Detraftors fliould blefs GOD, yet Sect.IV. while they detraft, they ad contrary to v#^ ***/ Reafon, which requires us toufe ourTongue for each others Benefit, and certainly they make ufe ef it to a quite contrary End. ff^ith the fongue blefs ^e GOD coen the Father ^ and therewith curfe njoeMen^uoho are ^ made after the fmilitude of GOD. Out of the fame Mouth proceedethBleJing and Curjfng. My Brethren^ tbefe things jam. 3. 9, ought not fo to be. Thus S. James ar- gues and thus alfo we do. He here in- cludes two Propofitions and a Cenfure. The firft Propofition is, that it is a Sin to curfe Men by reafon, that they are made after the Image of GOD, and to offend thofe whb bear the Image, is to offend the Image it felf. The Second Propofition is, that it is a manifeft Contradidion, to blefs GOD with one's Tongue, while at the fame Time, with this very Tongue, we are wounding his Image in Man. The Cenfure is comprized in thefe Words, My Brethren^ theje things ought not jo to be. All thefe Things fliould hinder us from Detraction. SECT. 120 A Treatife agalnjl Sect. V. i^^^mU^'M^i^0^^^^^^'^^^ SEC 7" J O N V. Of the various Circumftances 'which aggravate this Sin. «^j!^..^.^H^i^.^-, S all Sins are not equally ^^W^''^-?j^"rS.'^|» cumftances which accom- pany it. This we pro- pofe to fhew with refped to Detraftion, by relating many Circumftances, which may render it more criminal. A R T I C J. E /. Of the Circtimjlances ^hich ref^eSi the Perfon dctraBc^. Circumjlancc Firji. 1. *' I" I S a greater Sin to Ipeak Evil of -*- Parents, than k{ others, who are not fo nccirly related. Wherelore among that Imall Number of Commandments, which compoie the Law of GOD, wc iind an cxpiels c^mjuand orderingChildrcn to hvhGur l\itlcr iU^d Mother^: And S. Faul DETRACTION. lai Paul adds, that thn is the fir ft Command" Sect. V, ment "with Promife. They then who ^^J^]^^ ^iiflionour them by Detradion, violate this Precept ^ and, far from having a Share in thefe Promifes made to pious Children, they may exped and wait for the Effect pf the Threatnings theScripture denounces againft thofe, who defpile the Perfons to whom they are indebted for their Birth. We know what was the Punifliment of Canaan who difcover'd hisFather'sNaked- g««' 9- ^ pefs. To thisPunifhment are they expofcd who difcover their Parent's Nakednefs and Defeds : Defeds arc a true Nakednefs ac- cording to theLanguage of Scripture,which callsSinners, Perfons that are "^oor £f blind and naked. S.Paul alfo rapks among the Rom.3.17, frightful Sins of the Hcathpn, that of being ^without natural AffeBion^ which wastheEfied of thatPunilhmentGOD had ^«"'-^'5»' fent upon them, for having abandoned the Creator, and for having ferved the Crea- ture. As far as Parifcide exceeds bare Manflaughter, fo far Detra<^ion againftPa-r rents, lurpaffes in Enormity Detradion of thofc, who do not ftand related to us, This Crime is again redoubled, if after they have given us Birth, they have taken Care of our Education, and have taken Pains to furniih us with Soul-Goods, as well as thofe of the Body. a. Parents 122 A T^reatlfe againjl Sect. V 2. Parents ought not to backbite their ^-"'^^r^ Children. Nature it lelf feems to forbid this, having given them an Inftind, which prompts them to love that which bares thcirlmage, ( which occafioned the faying, that Children were the Medals ot theii Pa- rents ) and docs as it were caufe them to live after Death. It feems alio that the Law of Mojes forbids this, w^hen it prohibits feetbtng Exod. 13. a Kid in it's Mother* s Milk j becaule it *^ appear'd extreamly cruel, that what ferved to nourifh it, ftiould fcrve to deftroy it. And is it not equally barbarous, that they who have given Being to their Children, ihould afterwards rob them of theirHonour and Reputation, and all that is dear to them in this World ? In fine, S. Paul ex- prefly commands them,/;^/ to provoke their Eph. 6. 4. Children ^0 Wrath, What is there more capable of roiling, provoking and vexing them than to backbite them ? and yet Hiftory furnifhes us with Examples of fuch Parents ; iho' they are generally more apt to tell Lies to excufc their Children, than to tell the Trdkh in accufing them. Circumjiancc Second. For Brothers to detraft from one ano- ther, is a more heinous Sin of Detraction, bccaufc Nature requires, that theic be more D E T R AG no N. 123 more of Union between them. Bat this Sect. IV Claim which is naturally between them, wor^ Very often produces an Effect quite con- trary to what it ought. As they fee each other the oftener^ and fo know better the Defects one of another, and their blen- ded Interefts give more Occafion for mu- tual Difputes and Detradions. Let fuch know, that ^Brolher is horn for the ^^^^pjovi?.!? of Adverfity^ that is, to comfort his Bre- thren and Sifters in the Time of their Ad- verfity : *Tis not then for them to caufe this Adverlity, this Lofs of Reputation, which they ought to maintain according to divine and humane Laws. GOD declares that He will punilh fuch as break thefe intimate Ties. T^hou gived thy Mouth to Evil and thy fongue jrameth Deceit. ^'^^^ ^° ^^ T'hou ftttefl andfpeakefi again jl thy Bro-^'^' ther ; 'fhou Jlanderefi thine ownMother*$ Son. fhefe Things hajl thou done^ and I iept file nee ; thou t hough te/t that I "was altogether fuch an One as thy f elf -^ but I 'will reprove thee^ andfet them tn order before thine Eyes. Oh ! How much more referved fliould we be in our Talk, if we were fully perfwadec?, or if we well confi- der'd, what David here fays ! ( i. ) That GOD knows every Word we fay. (2.) That he keeps an cxad Account thereof. (3 ) That He will one Day fct all our Detrac- tions before our Eyes, to convince us that ^ wc* 1 24 A Treat ife againjl Sect. V, we luvc defervcd Death by ihcm. (4.) V^'V^^ That he will truly and really punilh us for thcin. (5.) That tho' ibmctiines he defer punifliing of us in this World, yet we arc not to think that he will let our Abufc of his Patience and Long-fuffering go al- ways unpunifhcd ; but that the Day will come, when he will make us to bear the Puniihment due to our Offences. a. By thefc fame Reafons, their Sin is aggravated, who endeavour to fow Divi- fions among Brethren, Sifters, Relations. And this (i.) Bccaule ihey ftrike at the Bands of an Union 6C Friendlhip between thele PcrLns, whofe Union ought to be lacred. (2.) Bccaufe when once Hatred isftirrcd up between them, it is almoltim- poflible that they fhould be reconciled. Their Hatred is more implacable and more durable, as Solomon teftihcs & Experience warrants. A Brother offended^ ( lays that Provxs 19-'^^'^^'^) ^^ f-^^^der to be won than ajirong City^ and their Contentions are like the Ears of a Cajtie. Hence it is that he ranks among the abominableThings which the Lord hatcth, Htm that Jowcth DiJ-^ Pror. 6 19 card among Brethren, Circuwjlance Third. An Husband commits a very confidcra- Mc S'D, when he Ipcaks ill of his Wife. DET'R ACTION. 125 SL Peter commands Husbands to honour Sect. V. their Wives, and to carry it rcfpedfully to ^-'Or^-/. them, as to the weaker Veflels, that is, if by an Infirmity cleaving to their Sex,they happen to tail, their Husbands ought not to defame them for it. S. Paul in many places of his Epiftle commands Husbands Eph.y.iji to Love theirfVives^ even as JefusChriJi has loved his Churchy his myjiical Spoufe and gave himjllj for it. ■ But how arc they loved and honoured, if their good Name is taken away from them. Is Love exprell to Perfons by fuilying their Repu- tation ? They who obferve not this Pre- cept do without doubt fin doubly, being obliged to love them as Believers, and Members of theChuich, which is theBody of the Lord ; and alio, as Spoufes. Be- fides this, they fin not only as Detradtors, but vaftly more as pe jared Perfons, having promifed to Love and Honour them at their Elpoufals. In a woid, it lliews great Imprudence to fpeak ill of Perfons who fo nearly touch them. After Marriage, the Couple become but one Flefh, and lb the Faults of the one refleft on the other, and a Man diflionours himfelfbydilhonouring his Wife. The holy Scripture furnilhe^ us with an admirablcExample in thisCafc, and worthy of Imitation by all Husbands ; 'tis that ol Jojeph^ of whom S. Matthew^ when fpeaking of him and his efpoufed ^^*P''>^^» Wife, 126 A Treat tfe againfi Sect. V. Wife, fays, that he fought to 'put her /?- ^^^^^'"^^ ^•/^v*^ penetrate ; fo that on many Occafions it would be great Rafhnels to diiapprove of what they f^y and do, which atfirft fight might appear Evil, Solomon teaches us how impenetrable their Hearts are, when he fays, The Heaven for heightbj and the Prov.i^j* Earth for depthyand the Heart of Kings is unCearchable, 3. Our own Intercft obliges us to refrain backbiting them. They have Power in their Hands, and can revenge the Detradions fpread abroad againft their Perfons. "ithey _, hear not the Sword tn vatn^ lays the A- poftle of the Gentiles ; and fo Solomon^ Prov.iy.ii The Wrath of a King is as the roaring of a Lion^ and he thatjtirreth it upy wrong- eth his own Soul. To conclude, Altho' we ftiould avoid the Effeds of their Refentment, yet it will be impoffible to efcape the Punifhment of GOD, who will fliow that He won't fail chaftifing in the ether World, thofe who have failed in their Rcfped to their law- fulSovereigns,and have detraded from them feeing he has even m this World fometimcs puniftied them for daring fo to do : Of this we have a very remarkable Inftance in Mi" ^^^ ^^. rianty recorded in Numb, i a. This Wo- man having fpoken 111 o{ MofeSy the Head and Leacjer of the People, GOD fmote her with. iiS A frcatife againjl Sect.V. with the Lcproly^andthat at a Timcw'hcn ^^'^^^^r^ the Punilliment of Rctah'ation, or the Re-- lemblancc of Punifliments to Sins, was inUlc- which teaches us, That if Detrac- tion be as catching as the Leprofy,it is alio, like itjanimpurejaloathfome and an odic)us Malady. 1, With regard to foreign Princes, whofc Subjeds we are not, indeed it is not fo great an Evil to fpeak ill of then> as of our own. But yet it is no inconfi- derable Sin, i. Becaule wc are to fpeak ill of no Man. 2. Becaule all Princes in ge- neral bear the vifible Marks of the divine Authority, and are ordatned oj GOD^ as S. Paul fays. 3. What we have faid of Princes and fovereign Magiftrates, regards alfo their Viceroys and Governours, which they fend into theirProvinccs, theirMinifters ofState and their Officers, for they truly are our Superiours. Therefore the Apoftle of Tit. 5, i,thcGentiles joins them with Principalities r'lT'"^ ^* ^^^ Powers whom we ought to obey and pray to GOD for. IfSubjefts aieopprel- fed, Satyrs againft their oppreflbrs arc not like to relieve them very much. 4. If Detraction and fpcaking ill of Sovereigns dclcrves to be condemned, no ids condemnable in Sovereigns is it to fpeak ill ol their Subjircts. Exalted aA in Fail they are by their Grandeur, they ougho bnght4:o leave fo mean and bafe a Vice to Sect. V others. It is alio a greatWeaknefs in them V^V^"^^ to backbite theirSubjeds, or others whom they can chtltife fo many other ways, if they have done what defervcs their Indig- nation. Befides that their Dctraftion is more deftruftivc than that of particular Perfons ; every one thinking It an honour to mind them, and almoft a Duty toimi* tate Princes and other great Men. The Emperor Julian^ called the Apofr tatCjWas certainly very much in the wrong", to write a Satyr againft his Subjefts of Antioch^ as we are informed he did, by iheodvret in the third Book of hi^ Churfh Hijioryy Chap* i8, Circumjtance Fifth. For a Minlfter to detradl is* a much greater Sin than for another Man, and c- Ipecially if he fpeak ill of Other Miniftcr^, or of his own Flock. Is it not a fearful Thing^that they who peculiarly ought to ferve the Lord, ftiould thus violate his moft holy Laws ? What a Crime is it, that they vvhofe Office it is to blcfs the People, fhould bufy themfclves ^^^"^^ ** about Things that are quite the Reverfe! I. They Sin more than others, becaufe they ought to know better, and can't fo c^fily cxcufe thcmfeives of their Ignorance K m 130 yi freatife againjl Sect.V. in this Matter. 1. With regard to GOD ^-^•^^^^^^ who has^, as it were, committed to them Ijifi L-aws, which they hereby violate. 3; With Rcic-rence to tlicir Neighbours, w^ho are more fcandalized by their Detrac- tions than by thofe of other fmful Men.- People are hereby induced to think, either- that Religioii it lelf is a meer FablCjlceing the Teachers and Expofitors of it, do thus^ trample it under Foot: Or that it is im-^ poflibk to practice it, fince they who ought to be moll godly, do not practice it's Ordinances, but on the contrary, do by Dctraftion violate them. And as every Thing in the Church ought to be pure, even to the very Wives of thofe who help to govern it, S. Paul I Tim. 3 j-equires,that the Wives of Deacons be not Slanderers. What I fay with regard toPaftors who fall into this Sin, I don't fay it fo much to cenfure their Conduft, which I leave to GOD's Judgment, as to warn the People, that they fhou'd not follow the Example of a Thing fo odious in thofe whom they wou'd imitate. ^^ ••'^'•' f-- ^-i' '^ 2. It is a very crying Sin for a People to fpcalc ill of Minifters, efpecially of their own. Let usconfider, that notwithfland- ing all their Defects, they arc in facred Writ, called, Jwhafjlidors jcr Chrtjl ; f%Tt- ^ngt/s oy Mefcfigcrs of GOD. whom in i!n fome fenfe, they reprelent upon Earth.SECT.V* Let us remember, that they arc fpiritual Jc^^^^. Fathers, who give Milk to the Weak, and ftrong Meat to thofe who are more advanced ; and who, according toSx..PauVs Expreffion, beget Men for our Lord Jefus Chrift, and endeavour to bring them to a Life as far above this, as Eternity is be- yond a fhort fpace of Time ; to infinite Pleafures, from Troubles and Miferies. In a Word, Let us be aware of the Corredion which Ifrael received, when they rofe up Numb, 1^ dgainft Aaron the high Prieft. Circumfiance Sixth To backbite Benefaftors is adding ^^*m^ ^ Detraft'ion, the Sin of Ingratitude, w^hich * •" ' * is certainly a very great Sin. Publicans and Sinners, fays our Lord, do good to thofe who do them good. Ungrateful Perfons therefore who hurt their Benefac- tors are worfe than Sinners ^ that is, theit Sin is greater than that of ordinarySinners. This Vice, and efpecially in the Subjcd: we are treating of, is fo direflly contrary to the Principles of natural Equity, that it may juftly be called a Sin againjt Na-- ture. Nay, it is fo cryM down in the World, that it is needlefs to fpend much Time in Ihewing all the Horror oi it. K z The A treatife againjt The ungrateful Wretch, who fays, that no Thanks arc due to tliole who have ob- liged hini, docs much Icfsdcfcrvc that they Ihou'd do him any Service. Circumfiance Sei:enih. When a Servant fpeaks ill of his Matter it is alfo more criminal than it another had done it, or than if he hadfpoken ill offomc other Peribn : Becaufe Mafters have a fort Cei. 5. II, of Sovereignty over their Servants, and be- caufe 6*. Paul io cxprelly requires thcfc latter to obey and rcfped them. On the other hand, theTendernefs which Mafters ought to have fjr ti' '^'t N\hole Fa- mily ( of whofe Number are Servants ) fhould hindci ihem from detracting, unlefs in Cafes of NecefTity, where they cannot difpcnfe with it without Lying, or com- ^'^' ^' ^' mitting focK other Sin. Circuwjlance Eighth. To fpeak ill of thofe we call FriendSjto dilcover their Secrets and Impeifedions, is Hypocrify, Inhdelity and Treifon joined to Detiadion. What ! Bjeaulc they cir'd in trufting to us as Friends, thtKnowledge of foiiic lecrct Imperfection, ihill we be fo wicked, as to dilcover i?v pubiifli it abroad, ;u the infamous DiiHlah did S.^^f/pju/J^^ Se- cret ! D E TR AGTI N. 133 tret ! Shou'd any Difference arife batweenSKcr. V, thofe who have once profefled FriendQiip, let them follow the Advice o{ Solomon^Dc^ hate the Matter with thy Neighbour^ and difcover not a Secret to another. To ad othervvife, is to contemn the facred Laws of Friendfhip, which don't allow us to do an Injury to our former Friends,even after juft Grounds ol Difcontent. It Ihou'd be our Care to chufe Friends, whofe Pro- bity and Virtue we have been formerly ac- quainted with J and when Friendfhip is once confirmed, we muft bear with mutual Defefts. And truly, they who thus betray Perfons with whom they have been or are ftraitly linked, fecm to condemn themicives by their own Pradtice. Here we may apply the Words of *£ Cbryfojiom. ^' When they " tell a Secret, they intreat, they conjure ** him that hears them, not to relate it ta ^* any one, thereby declaring that they *' have committed a Thing worthy of re- *' proof. For if you beg him not to tell *^ it to another, you ought rather to hay^ " refrained telling him iirft. Your Secret " was furc with you \ after you have re- " vealed it, you are felicitous for it's Con- " fervation. Woa*d you not have it di* *-'* vulgcd, then tell ii not to another, but '^ after that you have committed the kecp^ ^^ ing of your Secret to iiim, your Warn- K 3 /' ing 134 ^ freatife agalnji Sect.V. ^^ ing and Conjuring him to keep it, is ^<^^>r^ « but unprofitable and faperfluous '\ Every one looks with a kind of Horror on the Perfidy of Sabinus's falfc Friend, who by his Wiles engaged him to talk a Tacitus ^^^^^^ ^^° freely of the Emperor Tiber iuSy his Annals and lo by being anAccomplice in his Crime, ^ ' ** and then a Betrayer of him, caufcd him to be condemned to Death. Circumfiavce Hinth. To backbite thofe with whom we arc engaged by Civil Bonds, as Country-Men and Neighbours ; or by Religious Tyes, as thofe who profeis the fame Faith with us, is an aggravating Circumftance of De- traction. F^or if, according to the Apoftlc wc are to do good to allMen, but efpecial- 6al.5. 10. ly to the Houlhold of Faith, in Oppofition hereto, but in the fame Icnfe, we are to do Evil to no Man, clpecially not to the Houihold of Faith. Circumjlance tenth. To Detract from thofe who arc inAffllc- tion or Mifcry of what fort foever it be, whether in Poverty or Sickncfs, is a very .qreat Evil. Yet there is nothing more frequent than this. If a Man falls into Poverty, \vc immediately cry, he zvas n FooK DEfRACtlON. 135 Fooly that took no Care of his Buftnefs ^ Sect. V*, an ambitious Fellow^tbat wou'djiy with" eutWtngs. If aPerlon happen tobemifea able, we lay, tie has brought his Misjortune on himfelf. Suppole luch Talk, tho' often rafli, were true, and that GOD afflided him for his Sins, is it not ftill ever true. That to aggravate the Misfortune of the Miferable is very great Barbarity ? If it be GOD that chaftiies thofe Wretches, are not we much in the wrong thus to encroach on the fovereign Rights of the Lord. Sup- pofe it be their own Sins by which, as well as for which they are puniflied, mull webe the Executors of Sin ? Is not this to have Communion with Sin,to do it's Office,even to caufe Afliidion to Sinners, as it does^ tho' in a different way ? Is it not true,That fhouldGODpunilhourPr/J^, as he has the Faults of thofe whom we backbite and de- ride. That we might at leaft expect as great Punifhments as theirs ? Moreover, 'Tis not always for their .Sins that GOD puniihesMen : 'tis fometimes in Love and Wifdom. Tis a Prefer vative from falling or refalling into Sin, as a Phyfician will let a Man Blood, or adminifter Phyfick to him, to prevent a Sicknefs or cure it. I have juft now mentioned Pride^ which merits fevereChaftifement • and this I did chiefly, becaufe that it is from Pride, that we ordinarily infult theCalamities ofothers, K 4 being 136 ^^ freatife againR Srct.V. being ready to make Men think,That fee-* ^-^'>^^^ ing GOD fparcs us, certainly we muft be better than thofe \ve talk of; or that it is from our great Prudence and Sobriety, That we are prefervcd from Poverty and Maladies, David reckons the P^rfecu- tors of the Aftiidted among the very word of Men,whcn he fays, They -perfecute him 'whom thou haji [mitten^ and they talkt vh C9.16. thcGriefo^^ thofe "whom thou bafi wounded. A^ITICLE 11 Of the aggravating Circumftances^ ivith regard to Dctra^ors in 'particular, Circumfiancc Firji. ^~\ N E Circumftance which comes very ^^ near the lali: wc mentioned and which confiderably aggiavatcs Dctraflion is, to be t{\(: Author and hrft Difcovercr of it ; to reveal ^ Fault which no one before knew of; an)ong all Peaple, at all Times, in aU foits of Crimes, they who are the Au- thors of Vn) are looked upon as moil bla- meablc and cocfequently mofl rigoroufly treated. Ttic Leaders of a Rebellion for Example, as they aic the n:ioll diftinguifh- cd in the Sedition^ arc moil diilinguifhed DETRjiCflOK 137 in the Torments inflifted on the Rebels, Sect. V* •when taken. The Thing is the very lame ^^^V^- here. He that firft publifties a Sin, ought to be regarded as more criminal than thole^ who come after and relate what he had al- ready faid. The Reafon hereof is, that he is theCaufe of all that fliallbe fpfead abroad after him and according to his Example, to the Prejudice of his Neighbour • and in general, of all the pernicious EffeSs which accompany Detraaion. And let us not fay, that we have no particular Tye to thePer- fon whom we defame, to hinder our fo do- ing. The generalTye we have to allMen, as Children of the fame heavenly £C earth- ly Father, is a fufficient Reafon for our not diflionouring them, and efpecially for our not being the jftrftin the Undertaking. Circum^ance Second To name thole from whom we had the Evil Reports which hurt our Neighbour, is a Degree of Aggravation added to bare Detradtion. For hereby we doubly detradj firft from him who is the Objed of theDe- tradion; and fecondly, fromhimj by whom we heard the News, who is tacitly accufed of being a Detraftor, when we fay, 'twas Xfi wh€ firft acquainted us with the Fault, ARTICLE 138 ^ freatife againjt • ARTICLE ///. Of the aggravating Circumjtances uoitb regard to the Manner oj Det ration. Ctrcumjiance Firji. IF rafti Judgments are the Sources of Detradion, they are alfo of the Ways made ufe of to fpread it abroad. An In- finite Number of Detraftions arc only fuch Judgments upon the Conduct of others. This ralhnefs in Judgments is forbidden in Scripture, not only in general as it con- demns Detradion, but in particular, when it is faid, Judge noty that ye be not judged. I flian't here enter into the Common Place of Taih Judgments. I fhall only fay, as what I can't here difpenfe with that altho' they be true, yet thofe who make and fpcafc them, arc ftill culpable, fince this Kaihnefs is condemned by G O D ' s Law. And if they be falfe, they then form not only a Detradion, but even aCalumny. In fine, if we give our Judgments to others not as certain, but as probable^ not as ground- ed upon juft Realbns, but on Sulpicions, This is todo agreat Injufticc to ourNtigh- bour. 'Tis greatly to wrong him, to form Judgments grounded on Sulpicions/and to dcrtroy DE'f RUCTION. J3(? deftroy his Reputation by Probabilities. S^ct- For altho' we don't fay they are very cer- VTC^? tain, yet as the World now goes, chufing to cehfure, and ready to believe Evil,they, to whom we communicate thefe ralh Judg- ments, takeaPleafure in believing them well grounded and certain, and relating them as fuch, to other Perfons. Circumltance Second. Another Degree of Sin in Detraaion is to couch it in writing. The Reafon here- of is evident ; for it has then more evil Ef- fects. Words vanilh 6C may be forgotten j but Writings remain and may refrefh the Memory of Faults which we had forgotten. Words lifcewife extend but to a fmall Dis- tance, whereas Writings may go much far- ther and reach to the End of the World. O what aftrange and terrible Sort of Weapon is Detraftion, which kills at than a thoufand Leagues Diftance ! Add to this. That there appears more of a premeditated Deiign in this fort of Detradipn 3 and that we have more Time to think upon what we are about to do ; which doubtlefsAugments the Black- nefs of the Crime. tunnm^A ARTICLE 140 A fnaPife again (i ARTICLE IV. Of the Circumjtances "zvhich aggravate DetraHion 'jotth regardtotbc Vices and dins uoe ^ublt/b. A Firit Circumjlance. H E holy Scripture looks upon it as a rery great Sin to backbite and deride a Perfon on Account of his bodily Defefts. Therefore it formally forbids Uy T u. ^^Kfi^& ^^^ -D^^ i and fays, Thou fhalt ^"^'^^ * mt put ajiumbling Block before the blinds and Curfe the Dumb^ but tboujhaU fear the Lord thy God. To rail at and deride Perfons on Account of bodily Infirmities, to which they did not contribute, is to de- ride their Creator who made them fo. Tis moreover a manifeft Injuftice and Folly ; fmce, far from being the Caulc of thclc Defefts, they wi(h with all their Soul to be free from them, and were it in their Power, they would willingly get lid of them. And we may asjuftly accufe a deaf Man of having heard Conrpiracics againft the State without declaring 'em, as to raii at and find fault with hie Defects of Na- tare. We D E r R ^ C flO N. *4i Wc mi^ht enlarge here upon what we Sect V. juft mentioned under the firft Section, ^-^OTv-/ where 'twas faid that we fpeak ill of many on Account of their Birth ; or what re- gards theNovelty of their Race, and mean- ncfs of theirOrigin, or that they owe their Birth to fomc Crime, or that their An- ceftors committed fome Fault which dil- honours the Family. In general, wc may fay, that it is a great Injuftice to Pcrfons to deride and inliilt 'cm for things in- which they had no hand, and for which they arc not culpable ; to turn their Mifcry into a Crime, and hurt them for what they arc entirely innocent of, as well as to injure Pcrfons becaufeof bodily Infirmities which we have juft now mentioned. Is it then a Crime, an unpardonable Crime, and is it fuch a mighty unhappi- nefs, that a Man can't reckon up a long Race of Anceftors ? To judge hereof, let us confider, that the Eftecm wc have for the Antiquity of an Houfe is but the Ef- fed of Men'sHumour, who inotherThings prefer what is new / Let us confider, that thofe Families which are now ancient were once new, and that new ones may become ancient : And let us remark that all arc the Children of ^dam^ and Noah the RcftorcrofaloftWorld. As to Ilkgitimatcs, We fhould confider, That SOD dcoiarcs, Every one Ihall bear I4i ^ Treat tje againjl SECT.V.his own Iniquity, and lb they cannot, and £^^20^^^^?'^^ ^^^ ^^ ^^^^ ^^^ Crime of their Pi- ts, rents. He alio declares, that 'tis the Soul which fmnclh, which Ihall die, and that the Child Ihail not bear the Father's Sin. Let us oblerve, that GOD caufed thcChil- drcn of rebellious Parents, who died in tiic Defarr, to inherit the Land of Promile. Why then fhould we make the Children of the Wicked bear the Puniihment which GOD does not inflid on them ? at leaft when they don't follow theirEathcr'sFoot- fteps, why ftiould we impute a Crime to them, which the Lord does not impute ? Do we not on the contrary know, That GOD made wit oijeptbah^ ( who was the Judges ch. Son of a Concubine, ) to deliver his Peo- ple Ifraelixoxn their Foes, by the Hand of that valiant and wile Judge and General. We Ipeak evil of Illegitimates, cither when they are in Poverty and Mifery, or die when they have, by GOD's Blefling and their own Induftry arrived atlbme ele- vated Rank. If it be in the lirft Cafe, it is great Inhumanity to add to the Milcry of their Poverty,the Shame and Difhonour, which the World impute to ilich a JBirth. And if tliey arc in a ilourifhing Condition, if GOD has blcfled them, and railed them why fhou'd we debafe them, and if their own Wit has rais'd them to this high Sta- tion^ they arc lb much the more Praife- Wcithy DETR^CriON. »4| Worthy, ( far from meriting Contempt, ) Sect. V. in that they have rais'd themlelves without WorV, the Help of others. What we have faid, may aUo be applied to thofe,whofeParents have committed Faults that have been pu- niflied by the Magiftrate, or which altho* notpunilhed, do yet difhonour their Houle. Moreover what has been faid of the Un- happinefs of Birth, and the Infirmities of the Body, may alfo extend to the involun- tary Deteds of the Mind. To detrad from aPerfon becanfe GOD has not allowed him the Gift cf Memory, to deride invo- lutary Ignorance and invincible Stupidity, would certainly be a great Aggravation of Detraction, for the Reafons already alledged, andbecaufe in this they arc very innocent. Perhaps fomc may fay, if it be ^Oy then we do no wrong to a Man's Reputation, by fpeaking of the Defecls either of Body or Mind, becaufc none look upon them as Faults or Crimes of their own, and con- fequently, injure them neither in Honour or Fortune. 1 Anfwer, That yet many Times it happens quite otherwife : They who have thofe Infiimities, are all their Days the ScofFand Jeft of others • and the World attach a kind of Infamy hereto. Yea many Times, Thofe Blemilhes in a Man's Birth hinder his Advancement ; and fo to ayoid all this, the belt Way is not to mention X44 -^ Treatip againjl S«cT.V. mention them, and the worft way 1*9 to deride them. Far then be Irom us, thofc Pcrfons who can never Ipeak of another >¥ithout mentioning his DetVds and Fail^ ings. And kt thofe, who by their own Vcrtue and Piety have rais'd themfelves high, be as much above their Deriders, as theic are elevated above them in exter- nal Advantages. Circumjiancc Second. A Man Ihews himfclf extremely back- biting, when he divulges the Sins where* into his Neighbours have fallen, being as it weic forced into ihcm ; thro* the Vio- lence of Perfecution or being in danger of the Lofs of Life,or when in Ihort, Temp- tations have been over violent. Since th^lc Circumftances do infome Mealure extenu- ate the Sin before GOD, we all ought to have a relpect hereto, and to confidcr thi.C fuchPcrlbns deferve rather our Compaffion thanCcnfuijtr. Yea it is aDetradion mixed with Calumny, to reprefent thefe Siivi in all the Horror they wou'd have, were they not accompanied with Circumftances which make them lels. In ihort every Circum- llancc that IclFcns the Fault of the JDccr^ agijravatcs the Sin of the Publifhcr. DEfRACflON. I4J Circumjiance the Third. Sect. V 'Tis an enhancing of Sin to mention Faults of which Perfons have repented. Who would have reproached St.PeUr for his Cowardife after the Tears it had drawn forth from him ? Or David for his Adul- tery and Pride, after his Humiliation and Groans ? Or St. j^ujlin for his Debauche- ries, after his extraordinary Repentance ? How injurious would it be at the fame time we are proclaiming their Failings, fhould w« not fet forth their Vertue, and Ihew that their Converfion had more Greatnefs and Sanftity, than their Fall had Meannefs and Sin ? To do otherwife, would be acting diredly contrary to GOD, who fays, " That if the fVicked will turn jrom all his Sins that he has committed ^^^^^^^ andkee'^ all my Statutes^ all his franf'^u i»* ^ grejfions that he hath commit tedy they JhMl not be mentioned unto him* Circumjiance the Fourth. What moft enhances the Dilhonour and Infamy of our Neighbour, greatly aggra- vates the Sin of Detratlion. And as the Vices and Paffions of the Heart do more injury to his Reputation than the Defers of the Mind, it follows, that to fpeak of the former is the greater Sin. Among the . L Vices 146 A freatife againjt Sect.V- Vices of the Heart, I reckon all thofeSinf Y^f^ which S. Paul calls the Fruits of the Fit fi-^ ' '^ and all thoieCrimes of the Heathen, men- tioned in many Places of his Writii]gs,and alfo thofe which are to be and now arc 16 common in thcle laft Ages, according to his Predictions. • 'Ti« true we a^e with Grief to confefs tha:t many Pcifons glory in the grcateft Crimes, and that the more criminal Men are,the more thcy^ are applauded inftead of being contemned. But notwithftanding, TTis only by thofc Perfons, who arc engaged in the fame Crimes ' and the like Libertinifm. As for others, and' the more fobcr Part ot minkind, they do Retell in general, at leaft in others, all Sorts of Crimes. And they who plunge them- feives thereinto, lolc their Reputation ■with their Innocence ; m jrc or Icls accor- ding to the Degree of their Coriuption. Circumjlancc the Fifth, j 'Tis an Airgravation ofDetraftion when ^e mention Thinc;s, whereof not only the Doing is forbid, but alfo the very Recital, yea tho' it could be without Detriclion. Such arc the DcbaucHerics and Impurities, which S. Paul forbids us to fpeak of.- Chip. 39. Let no filthy Communication^ ( lays he to ttic Colojians^ ) proceed out of your Mouths •Jvi V JLcC D Ef R ACflO K 147 Let it not be faid that the Apoftle con- Sect. V, deransonly fuch lafcivious Difcoarfe as we our felvcs are Authors of, and not fach as we relate after others. TwoReafons prove the contrary. i. That he fpeaks in General and without Reftriftion, and wc fee nothing in his Way of arguing that might reftyain it. 2. That on the con- trary, his own Terms fticw that we ought to underitand it, as well of the Relatcrs as the Author of filthy Communications. Anc^ truly. Is not a Difcourfe as filthy and difhoncft in the Mouth of One as in*^ that of Another ? Thus tis a Sin even to relate fiichDifcourfe, and doubly fo, if it be with a Defign of hurting thofe whofe impure Words or Actions wc rchearfe. ARTICLE K Time and Place may aggra'oate the Horror of DetraSiim. P O R Inftancc, To detraft in thcChurch ^ and in Time of Divine Service: A Time and a Place, wherein far from being permitted to detrad, we ought not even to ipeak of Things indifferent : but where-* in we ought to edify one another by gooj Works, tnd not injure on© another. Ne- L a yerthclefs, 1 48 A Treatifc agatnjt Sect. V. verthclcfs, ( O the Wickcdnefs, ) we Ice >-^^'*^ Perfons who leem to come to thclb Tacred Places, only to examine curoufly, and ma- lignantly all that fhall be laid or done I Ready toccnlaie all that thePreacheifays, they whilpcr to others the ciiticalRcmarks they make upon his Difcourles, and vilify all thofe which are not falhioned according to their own P'ancy, and on Account of a Thouland other Things. In a Word, I fay that many of the Ways of Detradicn, which we have related and many of it's Sourcft which compofe the Third Scdicn, and in Gencraljthe Malice ciHeart,£<:c.&.c. which contribute to aggravate other Sins, have the fame EfFeft upon that wc are now arguing againft. Particularly, Befidc the Circumftances fpoken of in this Seftion, there are Three others which are very pernicious- i.That hereby we offend both GOD and our Neighbour,which is a doubleCiime. i.That we arc not ignorant that Detraftion is a Sin againft Charity. Let a Man rcprc- fcnt it ever lb little and trifling, ftill he knows it to be a Sin, and this Knowledge ierves to make it tJie greater • P aults com- mittcJ by Ignorance being more excula- ble. 3. That wc commit this Sin from very fmall Motives, yea from very evil Motives, as Self- Love, Covetoulnels, &rV. <•• i^^-e: ^<: ^^ ^ :-3^ ^^; >* ^ ^^ ^-^^ s^-^-: ^ The DEfRJCriON. ,4^ fbe Ufes of this Season. Sect.V. WE have endeavoured to remark thofe Things which make Detradion moft enormous. There are fo many Things which contribute hereto, ( as we may fee,) That it is very difficult that this Sin fhou'd not be accompanyed with fome of thefc deadly Circumftances, and perhaps with many of 'em. It is then very difficult but that a Detractor fins doubly, which fhould greatly induce us to hate this Vice. Per- haps among the Degrees we have menti- oned, there are ftill others, and among each we may meet with fomething that we have faid nothing about : Perhaps, I fay. The Subject who backbites his Sovereign, may fin lefs than the Child who fpeaks ill of his Father : Altho' it may be thus, yet there is no fcruple to be made but that they both fin greatly \ and all the Difference that will be found, ftiall be, that the one will be plunged deeper into Hell than the other. But where's the Man who wou'd try this Difference ? Who does not know that thcleaft Torments of this Abyfs arcM^r M4r. yet infinite Torments at leaft in DuratiDn ? ^"^'^^ •^^' That the Torments are the Flames of a Lake of Fire and Brimftone, accompanied with the Gnawings of a Worm that never ceafes^ never dyes. L \ The 150 ji freatije againll Sect. V. The fame may be faid in general of all ^^*^^^^^ the Degiees of this Sin, and even of the Sin it fclf confidered without its aggrava- ting Circumftanccs. Suppofc we fhould avoid thefe Circiimftances, yet what cou'd ve expect from bare Dctraftion, but that ve Ihould not be fo violently tormented as thofe who Ipcak ill of Parents, Mini- fters, SCe. But after all, we ftall be for- ever tormented with thePains of Fire ; the Torment whereof is not middling or tole- rable. Let us then fhun not only what cncreafcs both the Sin and thePunifliment, but let us avoid the Sin, tho' in it felf not lb great,that lb wc may be entirely faved from the Torments prepared for it. Tor- ments as certain as they are extrcam in the pain, Eternal in the duration. What we have faid in this Scdion docs not cxcuie little Sins. There will be al- ways reafons fufficicnt to combat them, tho' there be more againft greater Sins. ACrlminal lufFers Death, tho' there be but one Head of Accnfation againft him whieh defcrves Deatli, altho' lie wou'd have been more blameable, had he amafs'd a great Number. S EC f. DEfRACriON. I ji SECTION VL Sect.VI 0/ihe Effe^s of DetraBion. ^^^^'^'^^^ F Dctraflion be a Sin in its i»QQg^ caule they muft look on themklves as the Caufes of their Troubles, And truly, can they be ignorant that by their Detractions and Railcrics they have offended People ? Can they be ignorant, that offendedPerlbns fly to Revenge ? Can they flatter ihem- lelvcs that what they lay againil a Man behind him, will not be told him again ? Arc they not apparently expoled to all this every Time and as loon as they have publifhed their Satirs and pronounced their Judgments? What can we conclude from hcnce^ but that theie Perlbns who thus ex- pole themfelves to theLols ol Reputation, do Cn againft the Commandment of «S. Pauly who bids us feek tboJhThings uihicb are of good Report ? That thole w ho Ipoil ^^'^ ■ "^ ' their VVit and Judgment by their detrac- ting humour, do not only Imother, but e- ven diffipate thofeTaknts which GOD had trurted'tm withal for a quite diffcrentUle? And that confcquently they will be treated with more Rigour than unprofitable Ser- vanta ? That they who hereby corrupt their Hearts, do fin againft all thofe Com- mandments wliich urge to ftrivc after Per- fection, and to encreafe in Godlinels, far from dinnnilhing and extinguifhing it ? That they who bring Mil'erics on them- Iblvcs by their ownDetra6tions,are involved in thor lime Sin with Self- Murderers, - . except DETRjiGriON. tSi except that they Sin only in Proportion SbctVI to the Hurt bro't on thcmfelves • but if ^^'^^^T^ hereby they bring Death on themlelves, they are then Self-Murderers indeed ? That by railing Quarrels between them- lelves and thofe whom by their Difcourfe, they injure, they aft contrary to the Pre- cept of the ApoftlcP^/^/, who requires us ^^^^ ^^ to be at Peace ^ith all Men^ as far as is, in our Power ; ani to that of ourSaviour, to be harmlefs as Do'ves^ and ^ |s*^l ^«e| is*-^ ^^ 19^1^ |a»<^ ^^ ^ ARTICLE // Of the Efe^s of Detra^ion withRegard to our Neighbour Sy and Ftrft as to thoje who are fpken ill of 'TP I S certainly a great Injury to a '^ A Man to take away his Reputation, M which i<^2 : ATreatifc again (i Sect. vr- which is profitable and even neceflary for ^^^^^'^"^ liim in moll Circumftanccs of his Life. To Difcovcr his Defects is to hurt him lor Time palt, prclent and to come. For Time pall, bccaufc we nearly make the World judge, that all the Good he has for- luerly done was but the Effect of Hypo- crify • which takes away the Reputation acquired by Actions which perhaps were really good. For the prelcnt Time, bc- caufe as ibon as we think a Pcrfon vicious, we ccate to efteem and do him good. In fine, all the good he does for the Time to oomc, will be ever iufpeded, and taken on tiie wrong fide. We need but knowMen^ tt) be allured that this is their v/ay. The Evil we lay of Pcrfons may even return on their Relations, their Children ilnd their Polterity, by a Kind of Rever- beration or iecond Stroke, which is fatal to their Rife and Fortune. Moreover, tho' a good Reputation were net of fb high a Value as the greateftPart of tlie Wond imagine, 'tis fufficient tiiac they from whom it is ravifhcd, are per- iVv'a.Jed 'cis a very great Advantage, to make them exceeding outragious at it's being blotted. 'Twould be ncedlcls to fhew that all Mankind, look upon a good Rcnurativ^n as a very exquilite and precious G('6d. To ac(|uirc or prclcrvc it, Tiiou- fands do depiiyc thcniiclvcs of all that is dcaicft deareft to 'em, and do things which nata- Sect.VI rally they have the greateft Averfion to, ^^^>r*^. and cxpole thcmfelves to the moft evident and terrifying Dangers, yea, to an ahnoft certain Death many Times. No Wonder then, thatMen are fo enraged againft thofc who injure and diftionour them, and thaC they endeavour to be revenged therefor. A fecond Injury we do our Neighbour is, that we make him hate thofe who de- fame him, Willi their Hurt, and procure it when able : Which are Things very op- pofite to Charity : But the Condud of Detradors is not lefs fo, fince they are the Occafions of thcfe Sins, which Charity does not permit. So we put a ftumblingBlocfc in their Way. Still farther, Ihould the Perfbnof whom wc fpeak ill, be patient, good-natur'd and Chriftian-like eaough to Pardon the wrong we have done him j ftill this don't cxcufe the Detrador, fince it is forbidden us to caufe any hurt to our Brethren. Moreover, who is certain, but that he may relent the Wrong done and retain De- fires of Revenge, altho'thcydo not appear and break forth immediately. What greater Injury can we do a Man, than infallibly to deftroy his Reputation, to make him lofe his Innocence, to be at leaft an occafionalCaufc of his ownMiiery in this and the future World? Do we not M 2 diabolically 1^4 -^ T'reatije again fi SECT.VIdiabolicully tempt our Neighbour by en- ""^ ' g^^g^^^g ^^"^ ^^^ Crimes worthy of Hell ? Is not this to be an Inftrument of the Devil ? Is it not to go beyond him in Wickednefs, who in thisLife hurts only theSoul, whereas Detractors deftroy his temporal and fpiii- tual Benefits. ARTICLE ///. DctraBton is hurtful to thife of our Neighbours ^ho hears us deira^. DEtraftion is fatal not only ti the De- traftorand the Detrafted^buc to thole alio who hear others detract. And this Icveral ways. As, 1. The Example we fet before our Neigh- bour in Detra6t'on,isoftentimes moie than llifficient to engage him therein in like man- rcr. 'Tis by Ulc, Curtom and Example tliat the gieatcll part of Mankind futfcr thenifclv*.s to be kd. Thus he who gives ethers a pernicious Example, is partly the Caufe of thole Sins which they thereby rommir. And lio to himhy uohotii the ' Offence Cometh ! 2. 'Tis farther flual to Perfons who are rTncP'jbccaule Detradors do their utmcft to engage them in Dctradion. They will ask Luk.17. D E r R J C T 10 N. i(?j ask their Advice or their Approbation ; Sect.VI call them toWitnefs for theT»-uth of what v.^'V^^^ they fay ; ufe all their endeavours to make them alfo detrad, that fo as Accomplices therein, they may not reveal to him who has been talk'd againft, what was faid to his difcredit : For how will they dare to accufe others, if thofe that areprefent were not partakers in the fame Crime ? Pru- dence would allow no fuch Thing. 3. Detraction is a deftrudtive Sin as it furnifhes the Auditors with a Subjed and Matter for their Detradions elfevvhere j by furnifhfng them with the Defeds of others, of whom they were ignorant, they have afterward wherewith to cenfurc their Con- dud. This is not only a declaring War with ourNeighbour, but a furnifhing others with Arms to fight againft him : Thus the Sin is double. z 4. Detradors caufe the Hearers of ^eir ill Language, to defpife and hate thofe who are fpoken ill of before 'em, which is a Sin both in the Detrador and in thofe who hear him detrad. 5. If thefe lafl: are already corrupted, the Vices and Crimes of othcrs,\vhich they hear fpoken of, encourage them, to perfift in their own,being perlwadcd they are Sins which many Perfons fall into, and there- fore are but fmall : As if each one of thofe who doeyil, retained with himfeif a part M 3 of i66 A Treatife agdtnjl Sect. Vfof the Horror of the Sin, and fo dlminiflicd itj being thus divided into many Parts: But on the contrary it is communicated to an infinite Number of Perfons, \sithout lofing any Thing of it's grcatnefs and wickednels. On the other hand, Shame wou'd keep a Man to his Duty, if he faw himlelf the on- ly wicked Perfon ; but Men think there's r.o more Shame to b*^ feared, when they have many Con>panions, In fine, As 'tis Example whicH 'leads Men into Sin, lb 'tis E::anple which keeps 'em in it. But if thofe before whom wc detract, be lioneft, foberPeiTonSj'tis much to bcfear'd, that when they compare themfelves with thofe we fpeak ill of, they will take oc* cafion to brag and Jift themfelves above them, by a Pride natural to thofe who think themfelves better than others. 6, The Crimes we relate, arc like Hum- bling Blocks which caufc the Auditors to fall into Sin. Vice has a peftilcntial and communicative Air, which makes a deep ImprefTion on the Heart. FiltliyDifcourfc, and in general, all fuch as difcovers and makes Sin known, has the fame Effed as ill Writings have. How many Pcrfons wouM have been all their Life-Time igno- rant of the way of committing a thoufand forts of Vices, had they not read or heard how others fell into them, and how fome have rehn<;d on the common way of fin- r.ing ? D E r R ACTIO K ' Uj ning? Or let us fappofe, That aMan^ECT.V learns nothing of thole Sins, but was ac- '•^^"^^"^ quainted with 'em before ; yet certainly, it is ever a very dangerous thing,to refreih the Memory anew, and caufe it to think thereon again, fincc from Tho'ts we too commonly proceed to Deeds. Detractors do in particular caufe this great Evil to thofe who hear them, that ^they kindle betvveen thofe they talk'd of, and thofe who hear them, furious En- mities and long Quarrels, and thereby trouble the Repofe of their Lives. This is excellently well exprefs'd by the wife Pi'-'^^'io y[?iU^ Hljere no IFood is^ there the Fire goeth out :^ fo ^here there is no fale^ bearer^ the Strife ceafeth. 'Tis clearly feen, That as Wood is the Matter for Fire, fo Reports are the Matter of Quarrels, whereof Detraftors arc the Caufcs. And in another Place Sohmon fay, The fVords of ^ale-bearers are as IVounds. ARTICLE IV. Detra^ionis "very fatal to any State and Society^ I. A Fter having prov'd Detraftion to be -^ very fatal to particular Perfons, it follows that it is deadly to a State ; feeing a State is compos'd ot the variousMembers which form it, and to whom Detraction is very hurtful. M 4 a. Hiftorys 16^ A freatife againjl Sect.VI 2. Hiflorys both ancient and modern ^^^^^^ furnifh us with lufficicnt Examples otTrin- ces, who having fpokcn ill of others, have made them their Enemies, whereby their Kingdoms andSubjccts have extremely fuf- fer'd by thefe Wars, Bcfide foreign Wars, has not Detradion raised a thoufand civil Tumults and Quarrels among Fellow-Citi- zens, fo much the more pernicious as they verc Members of the fame Body, which thus rent each other. 3. When the Enemies of a State learn by means of their Spics,and thefe by means ' of Detraftors, the Vices whereto the Prin- ces of a Kmgdom abandon themfelvcs,they will certainly lay hold of their Weaknef^ fcs and make ufe of the Detractions which have been difcovcrcd to them. 4. They who backbite Princes andMa- giftrates do certainly a very great harm to their Country. As foon as the Faults of ihofc who hold the Reins of Government, arc made publick, and their Perfons turned to ridicule, they are look'd upon as un- worthy or uncapable of governing ; People defpife thoir Orders how juft foever they be, and fo bring Ccnfufion into the State. ^. I can prove by the Words of a great Politician, and whofc Witncfs is very wor- thy of beliel', That Detraftion is very per- nicious to a Society and a State. Scornful prcr i^s•;)/(^/;^ fiys Sulomou^ hrjng a City into a DETRJCflON. 16^ Snare. An Example taken from Hiftory Sect.VI will fet forth what &/^;;^^/? fays, and jaftify ^^^OTS! his AlFertion. When ylgathocles beficgeJ a City, fome on the Walls derided 8C fcof- fed at him in thefe Terms, Potter * , fi^^here will you get Money to pay your Soldiers ? He anfwered, fVhen I Jhall * have taken this City. Having at length conquered the City, and fold thofe whom he had taken ; If^ faid he, Tou again rail at me^ Til complain to your Maflers oj you \ : Thus deriding them in his turn, r'diculing their Detraction, and Slavery, which was the Recompence thereof. 6, Detraftion is certainly very hurtful to the Repofe and Happinefs of a Society, and the Intereft of a State : And thofe Princes who have had at Heart a Concern for thefe Things, have'Yeverely punifli'd fatyrical Perfons, drove away Accufers and other Defamers, Examples whereof HiftOry furnifhes us withal. Now if De- traftion be pernicious to a State, then De- traftors do fin on this Account alfo, fince \ve are inConfcience obliged to contribute our utmoft for the Welfare of our own Country. On this Account therefore GOD ordered the Jews that were carried away ^- This was his Father's Occupation. t His Soldiers being ngw their Mailers. lyo A freatife againfi $ECT.VIto Bahylorjy to pray for the Profperity of Jj^'^^^TT! ^^^^ Empire, ^vherc notwithftanding they were looked upon as Priibners of War, ra- ther than Citizens, but which flill was as it were a fccond own Country to them : ThisRcafon likewife engaged youn^Davtd tSaro.17. in a dangerous Fight with the Enemy of his own Country. ARTICLE n DetraBion is hurtful to the Church, I* ITjT E may make the fame Remark ^^ here w^ith reference to Paftors, that in the foregoing Article we did as to Princes and Magiftrates, namely,That they who lay open theif Defecls, do thereby de- prive their Auditors, their Flocks, of the Fruit which they might reap from their Difcourfes and Exhortations. When Peo- ple are once convinced, that their Teachers lead an irregular Life, they foon disbelieve what they fay, how^ true ibever it be, and leave pradifmg what they prefcribe, tho' everfojuftin it felf. Thus little arc a Flock obhged to thofe that fhcw ihem their Leaders Errors and Vices. Hence 'twas rurcb. De faid o{CovJia?Jtine the great, that had he Hh%T 'with his own Eyes fccn a JJilhop dcliling his D E f R A C r I N. lyt his Neighbour'^ Bed, he would have co-Sect.VI ver'd the enormous Crime with his own ^-^"V^-'^ imperial Mantle, for fear any one fhould be fcandalized therewith. 1. Detractors hinder the Name of GOD from being glorified. Lei your good fVorks ^^^^^^^^^^^ fojh'me before Men^ that others may glor- rifyyour Father "which is in Heaven^ faid pur Lord. Whereby it appears that it is by the Sight of our good Works that o- thers are induced to glority GOD. How then will they glorify him, if they fee no^ thing but evil Works, or at leail evil Words in Detractors ! And on the othep Hand, fee nothing but Evil in thofe whofe Sins they difcover ! 3. As when one Member is honoured,all the Members have a part in the Honour, according to S. Paul^ lb when theMembers ^Cor.n,!^ are dilhonoured, the whole Body fufFers j * and Detraftors do even the greateft Out* rage they are capable of, to Jefas Chrift the Headof the Church ; fmce they injure his Religion, whofe Beauty they tarnifh, whofeErficacy they ftint, and wholeSucceft they retard. (i.) With Regard to thofe within the Church : Who can doubt for inftance,thac when the Leaders of Churches are quarrel- ling about Trifles, and Difputesand Qucf» lions about Words, and do anathematize each other for meer Nothings, andcompofe, Yolums 1 7i A Treatife againfi SicT.VI. Volums for the Ruin of each others Re- ^-^"V^^ putation. Who can doubt I fay, that when the Shepherds are thus at variance. Wolves will not come and carry off the Sheep by open Violence, or by Ambufh ? And that while they fpend their Time and Care a- bout reciprocal and particular Quarrels, their Flocks will not be deprived ot thofc Inftruftions which are neceffary to form them for folid Piety and the Pradlicc of good Works ? Moreover, thefe Difputes among Divines, the Injuries which they heap on each other in their Books, ferve to foment thofe unhappy Divifions with which we fee the Church torn. Can thefe Men of fuch contrary Sentiments pretend to gain any Thing to thcmfelves ? No \ There is nothing fets them at a greater Diflance from any Advantage than this. Detradion does alfodeflroy that Harmony which there ought to be among all theMem- bers of one and the lame Body, as in the Church, It has been already fhewn that nothing is more effedual than this Vice,to laife Difunion and Difcord, and nothing is more certain than that this Dilcord is per- nicious to the Church,which, like thcState, can fubfift only by thcUnion of thole who compofe it. The Comparifon of 6*. Paid is aProof of this faying. He fiicws us that as a Body cannot fubfift, if all thcMcmbcrs do not agree, folikcwifc theChurch,\vhich he DE'tRJCriON. 173 he compares to a Body, cannot fubfift, if Sect.VL Peace do not reign among its Members, >-^^v**^. and confequently it Detrai^ion be not ba- nilhed. And as Detradion is an Enemy to the Humane Body & the Body Politic, fo it is alfo to the Body Ecclcfiaftic. (2.) With Reference to thole without the Church: Detrat^ion hinders the pro- grels of Rehgion, Thole Princes who arc the Enemies of a Rehgion, do often take Occafion to perfecutc it, by Reafon of the Detradion of its Profeifors. Thereby they perceive the Defeds and Vices of its Mem- bers, and under Pretence of banifliing Vice out of their Dominions, they banifli the Religion it feif. UnaerPretence that the Difcord is fatal to the State, they banifh Religion which is by no means theCaufe of it, fince it forbids it. They among Infidels or thoft of ano- ther Communion, hearing of the Faults of Perfons who profels a Re]:g*on which they know only by report ot others, are eafily pcrfuadcd that all, or at leaft the greateft Part of thofe of that Religion, arc Vile Perfons, whofe Worfliip as well as Company, ought to be carefully avoided fo that hereby the Name of GOD is blas- phemed, according to S.PauV^ Expreflion. Rom.2,24, Detradion is alfo a very great hindrance to the Converfion of Infidels. I fuppofe hcre^ that an Infidel has read or heard fay. 1 74" ^ freattfc againjl SECT.VIThat GOD'S Word works with might in i^Th^iTT. th^^i ^hat believe, and is (harper than any »3- two edged Sword, piercing even to the di- CJ.4. 1.. ^,jjj^g alunder of Soul and Spirit, and of the Joints and Marrow: Conld liich acne refrain reflecting thusr Certainly this Word is not true, fincc it docs not convert it's Profeffors, of whom I hear a thoufandEnor- jnities told, that are not found among us. And when he dcnyed the Truth of this Word, He wouM be little concerned to Embrace the Religion founded upon it. Or had he a Mind to rank himfelf among Chridians, wouM he not lay, " Where '' fhall I find them ? Thefc who call them- *' fclves fuch, do not follow the Rules and " Morals ot their Glnifl, when they are *' nccufing each other. How can they " be perfuaded, That he was a true Pro- *' pliet and the Son of G O D ; fincc, ac- *' cording to what they lay of one ano- *' ther, tliey do not obey his Laws and his " Goipel ? They tell indeed of an Holy " Spiiir, who is to lead them in Piety and '' Virrue, but who can lee this Hulinels ^^ in their Conduct ^ or who can fee the " Image or Effeds ol this GOD, in their '' ActKMv ? " What Idea of theChiiitian Relijiijn wouM a Pairan have ? When he heard thole who ex ten ally profcls it,fpeak ill ol' each other lb frequently as they do, wou'dhc notihink and fay,f/;j/ thckGod had DET'RJCriON. 175 had commanded them to detraB ! A Tho't Sect.VI very likely to deter them from embracing ^.^*V''^> it, Detraction being contrary even to that Law of Nature, engraven by GOD on the Hearts of all Meo. What Idea cou'd a Pagan have of our holy Religion, when he knew it not in its Grounds, and fuch as it really is in it felf, and was ignorant of the Author of it, but judged of it only by the Words and A6lions of thofe who pro- fefs Subjeftion to this Religion and this Legiflator! Detradors then do as far as they are able, crucify themfelves afrefli' the Lord of Glory and put him to open Heb. ^. e^ Shame. Alas, had we the Intereft of Re- ligion at Heart, and were we concerned for GOD's Glory, ftiould we not ad in a quite different Manner ! Wc fhould do as much for the Advantage of this Religion, as worldly Potentates do for their own Interefts. They conceal their LofTes and Difgraces as much as they can, thatfo they may not add too much Courage to their Enemies. Thus ought we to hide from ' the Enemies of our Religion, the Lofles which it fuffers every Time the Profeflbrs thereof wander from its Maxims. There- by we Ihali hinder the Infults and Re- proaches of its Enemies and rather gain them over to Chrift. Being obliged as we are to pray for the Peace of Jerufalenfy ^^*^;^"-^« to feek the Profperity qf the Church, and the 176 j4 fnatife again ft SECT.VIthe Propagation of the Faith, Detractors do on this Hand fin very apparently, in- afmuch as they know that the Church fuffers greatly by their Detraftions. |9» <^ |9>«^ 1B»«| !^«ftl |»*8| ii>«5| i9»«a| iBiiei |^<^! i^ ARTICLE Fl Of the forrouoful Effe^s of DetraBlon^ 'with Regard to the next h orlcL THE laft and moft fatal Effeft of De- traction is, That thereby Detractors lofc Heaven, and plunge themielves into the Horrors of the bottomlcis Pit. This was proved in that Section where we fpake of the greatncfs of this Sin, and 'twas there ihewn, that they who commit this Sin fhall noL enter into the Kingdom of Hea- ven j and that, by PalTagcs lo formal and fo numerous, that it is mipoffible to an- fwer them by Realon, or to elude them by Artifice. How is it poffiblc that Detractors Ihould enter intoHeaven,whcre all is Love 1 Of all Virtiics this alone Ihall there fubfift, but in an c :tent quite different fiom that of the moft Charitable here below • for all other Vcrtues Ihall be changed into Love, to Itrc igthen this. How then can Dc- traduis enter into the Tabernacle cf the Lord ! Dctradors, who fo openly wound this r> Ef R J C T I O N. lyy this heavenly Virtue, and^do the Works of Sect.VI the Devil. This would be a bringingHell ^^^"^^''^^ into Heaven. ''Tis a Folly to think of u- niting two Things, that are fo incompati- ble. But is It not afting the Madman, to expofe one's felf to the Danger of Deftruc* tion, or rather to the inevitable Lofsof the Riches and Glories of Paradife ? If we won't hide theFaults of our Neigh^ bours, how can we hope that Jefus Chriil will hide our Faults, when He Ihalljudge the World in Righteoufnefs ? He will iound his Arrefts on our Pradife or Omiflion of Love. To thofe whom he fhall condemn M»tf, iis will not excule the Detractor j for they who leave Vengeance to GOD, fhall be avenged by hii7i, according to the Wrong done them. Moreover^ D E fR JG no N. i8r Moreover, It feldom happens, that theySEcr.VI whofe Honour has been fullied, and whole ^'^^ "^ Credit has been diminiftied, do notRcvenge themfelvcs on the Injurious and make 'ern Repent : and a Detrador never can be faved if he do not Repent and be Converted, On thefe two Regards,where all our Inte-^ refts are united, let me uie the Words of the Apoftle, If ye bite &f devour one am* ^^^ ^ ^^ ther^ take heed that ye he not confumed one of another^ SECTION VII. Wherein fome Douhts and Cafes of Con-- fcience are rejolved-^ and 'tis fhewn That all Det ration is not a Sin. ^.J^.i^,J?..^lb Avingfliewn in general, That ^^J'C^?!^ Detraction is a very great Sin, S^ H ^g we fhallat prefent ftiew, that «^i^£^^lK§&' this Rule has fome Excepti- ^^-^•^^^ ons, and that m many Cales, I)etraftion is not a Sin, but h very law- ful and even necelfary. ifi general C yl S E. It may be faid in a general way, That all thefe Reafons whigh on fome Occafions fhould hinder us from detracline;,fuch as the divine Command, Charity, Juiticc, fcrV, N 3 do iSi A Threat ife again fi Sect, do upon othcrOccafions oblige us to fpeafc ^'^^' ill of our Neighbours. At lirlt fight it S^y^v^ appears obicurc and contradiftory, that the fame Thing Ihould bebothjuft and unjuft, charitable and contrary to Charity, con- formable and incompatible with GOD's Law. Nevcrthelcls, we hope to fhew in the Sequel, that there is nothing impoffi- ble herein, when we confid-r Detraction under various Views. ^d CASE. To fpeak ill of the dead is no Crime, provided the 111 we may fay of them, does no harm to theirChildren and other People ^vho are ftill living : On Condition tho' that we take Care before whom v.x talk, and that the Knowledge of their Sins do no harm to the State and to Religion, and that we fpeak not of them thro' Paffion. Provided we obfervc thefe Precautions, I don't fee what fhould hinder us from fpeak- ing of the Vices of the Dead, when Occa- sion prcfents. For, I. When the Scripture requires us to fpeak Evil of no Man, it docs not forbid us to fpeak of the Vices of the Dead, fincc thefe Words, no Man, apparently refer to the Living. What conftitutes a Man is tlie Union of Soul and Body, and this U- nion ccafcs by Death, fo that a dead Man is uot properly a Pcrfon. 2. Were DEJ'RJCriON. 183 3. Were it unlawful to fpeak ill of the Sect. Dead, it would follow that no Hiftories ^^^- ought to be wrote ♦ and many other Ab- ^•^^"^^^**^ furdities. 3. One principal Reafon why the Scrip- ture forbids Detraction is, becaufe it hurts the Perfon fpoken of • but this Reafon cealing by Death, which fecures a Man from the worft of Evils to which he is expoled in this Life, nothing can hinder but that one may freely tell his Opinion concern- ing his paft Condud. To the foregoing Sentiment it may be objeded, I. That a good Reputation is a Benefit to a Man even after his Death ^ but that Detradion ravifties it from him and hurts that good Reputation which furvived him. I anfwer, that thisgoodName which many Perfons make fo much of, and for which they will facrifice the true and folid Hap- pinefs of Life, that fo they may enjoy the Gharader of brave and worthy Perfons af- ter Death, is but a Smoak, which often- times may do a Man good while alive, but which alter Death can do him no good at all. Still further, as the Dead know no longer what is done under the Sun, io ^^^^^ they have no more any good Thing here which belongs to them. a. Some may fay, that at all Times &: in all Places, the Tomb has been looked upon N 4 as 184 A freatife again/t Sect, as a facred Place, and an Afylam, or Tlace ^^i}}^ of Refuge, which \vc nnght not touch, without a kind of Prophanation, and that therefore we ought not to rake the Dead out of the Tomb to bring them forth and dctraft from them. Ianl\ver,thisArgument looks fomething fpecious, but is not folid at all, as will ap- pear if we will examine theDifFerence there is between raking up a Corple and Ipeak- ing ill of the Adions a Man did while his Soul and Body were united. The raking up of a Corpfe is a fpiteful, unnatural, un- neHary Action, whereas the other may be done without Malice, and be ibmctimcs tieceflary, Sd CASE. Should any one demand whether or no It be lawful to fpeak ill of Nations in ge- jicral, and whole Bodies,of what Profeflion Ibevcr they be • 1 anfsver, that doubtlels it is lawful to fpeak in general, becaufe among lb great a Number there will cer- tainly be found Ibme honed Pcrfons. If lor Inllance, I lay that the Spaniards arc fiauglity and lazy, I do not ftill intend but thai there be humble & laborious Ferlbns umong 'cm. S. Paul giv^es us an Example and Proof of what I advance. He did not Hick to fay that the Cretians or Candians '^'^* ** '"' are always Liars, JJoiv Bellies. Yet flill ic mult be icmcmbrcd^ that all which is U^vful DETRJCflON. 185 lawful is not always proper and expedient ; Sect. and that all Things do not edify. Thus '^^^' if we have Reaibn to fear that any one '"^^"^^'^ will be offended at what we fay ill of his Nation or Profeffion in general, or that any other Inconvenience may arife therefrom, we ought to refrain fpeaking. 4th C J SE. As to Railleries, I lay that all forts of Railleries at the Abfent are utterly for- bidden ; unlefs they come under the Ex- ceptions in this Section. As to Railleries at Perfons when prefent, I am not for condemning them under cer* tain Precautions. The firft Precaution is, That it be not done too often ; but only Ibmetimes for ' an innocentDiverlion, and not asaBufinefs, according to the Practice of fome. If GOD permits, that our Spirits as well as Bodies do fometimes take a Loofe, yet wc are to confider, that this ought not to be the prin- cipal Bufmefs of our Lives, but rather an Help that we may return to our ferious Employments with more Application, lels Wearinefs, and confequently, greater Suc-^ cefs. A lecond Precaution is, never to offend thole whom we rail at, never to touch them to the quick, and not jeft with 'em, if they don't underfland Jetting, as we lay. They muft be aw^re that we arc playing and 1 8^ A frcatifc agaifijt Sect, and not fighting ^ that what we fay is to ^^^- caufc Mirth, and not mutual Dillontcnt. ^''^^^'^'^^ The third Caution is, that when wc re- partee, we allow the other to reply in his turn; neverthelels it may be obfcrved that thofe who moft love to jeer others, arc lead willing to be jeered themlelves. tor Pride linds its Advantage in the former, and its Diladvantagc in the latter. A Fourth is, that we abftain from Rail- lery before, thole who may afterward have an ill Opinion of thofe whofe Defects wc lay open by our Raillery, A Fifth is, that we do not make Sport with others in time of publick Calamities, and when our Tears and Groans are re- quired rather than Mirth. The four laflConditions 1 have laid down, do fhew how necclfary the lirft is. And truly, as it is very rare, cither that they whom wc rail at arc not offended, or that •vvc our lelvcs are not Angry when derided, or tliat there be not ibme Fcrfon who may have an ill Opinion of thofe who arc jeer'd in hisPrclcnee, and Chriftians having Sub- jefts enough to be more forrowiul than Merry, it is needful that our Railleries be but very rare. Sth CASE. 'Tis not only lawful, but profitable, for Perfons to acquaint Parents of their Chil- dren's Vices, when they arc lb blind that they DEfRACriON. 187 they cannot fee them, or when Excefs of Sect. Love which they bear their Children, hin- ^Ji^^ ders 'em from feeing their Imperledions. Thus they were not in Fault who told Elf the high Prieft, of the Debaucheries,Cove- teoufnefs and Profanity of his Children. The Reafon why what we fay is lawful, is, that it is not likely that Parents will make life of the Knowledge of the Sins of thofc to whom they are Itraitly tyed, to hurt them. On the contrary, 'tis apparent that they will ufe it to corred them for their good. Thus did holy £//, w^ho took Oc- ^^^^^_^^ cafion from the Reports concerning hisSons, zj, * ' * to give them wholfome Reproofs concern- ing their Condud. What has been here faid concerning Pa- rents and Children, may extend to Matters andServants,andin aWord,to all thofewho may contribute to the Ad vantage and not to the Lofs ofthofe whole Irregularities they mention. Only we mutt take Care, hov/ we Ipeak ; not to do it, that fo we may ex- afperate the Parties ^ and not to fpeak with Revenge our felves,but always to haveLove before our Eyes and in our Mouths. 6th C 4SE. From the Principle now laid down, iC follows, that 'tis no Crime to tell the Mi- nifters and Guides of the Churches, the Faults of their People, that fo by their CeF.fures and Exhortations, they may caufe Sinners" i8S y^ Trcatife againji Sinners to enter into the Path ofRighteoul^ nefs and Salvation. Thus we don't lee that 8. Paul was offended, becaufe He was ^Cor.j, i-told oi'the inceftuous Pcribn at Corinth, ytb CASE. The Exccmmunication which S. Piwl prcfcribes, and wou'd have practiced againll Icandalous Sinners is not a criminal Detrac- tion, when it is made ufe of on the Occa- lions and for the Ends prefcribed by the Apoftles. Tiie End thereof fhould be to fhame the Sinner who is excommunicated, that fo this Ihame may bring him to Re- pentance £C a favingConverfion. It fhould alfo deter others, and to make them fear the fame Punifhment, if they live irregu^ larly. The Occafions whereon Excommunica- tion is to be put into Pradlice are when thcCrimcs are well proved, certain, publick and great. Othcrwife wc are to make ufe of particular Cenfures, and if we ad other- wile. Anathemas become true Dctradions, fince without Hope of a^iy good,and with- out the Command of GOD, they may caufc very great Evils. %tb CASE. (t may be enquired, Whether we can without dctrading or finning, tell the Ma- giitratc3 concerning thofe forts of Sinners who are punifhcd by civil Laws, and the Laws of all Natioi^Sj luch as Robbcrs^Mur- dcrcxs, £vc. To DEfRACflON. 185 To this I fliall give fomc Light in the Sect. following Piopofitions, Ji^^Lj I. We ought doubtlefs to tell theTruth before Judges, \vhcn call'd by and before themtherefor,becaLifeother\vife\ve fliall be guilty of that falfe Witaels exprefly for- bidden by the divine Law. 1. 'Tis certainly our Duty to difcover Criminals when the Laws command it, for in this Cafe we cannot difobey the civil Laws ofMagiftrates without linning. Now fince the Laws which forbid the Crime, do at the fame Time require us to difcover the Criminal if we know him, we ought to difcover him inObedience toourSuperiours, and to prevent our finning, 3.The Scripture fays exipvcfly^thoujhal/: Deutiii^^ /;^/ fujffer the JVicked among thy People. Wc muft then acquaint the Magiftrate of them, that fo he may banifh them or put them to Death, orpunifii them fome other Way. 4. Were it not lawful to bringCriminala to the Magillratc, he could never punifli them, fince otherwife he can have noKnow- ledge of 'em. So that Society wou'd be foon founu in a woful Confufion. It is laid very well on this Subjed, that Com" pajjion for kicked Men is Cruelty to the Innocents^who are continually fuffering by their Violences, and whofe Example is very pernicious^at kaft while they go unpunilhed • whereas i^o A frcaftfc againjl Sect, whercas thefe Chaftilemenrs fcrvc as a Bri- ^^^- die to thofc who intended to commit the ^^^^''^'^ like Things. J. ITwe favour the Sinner, \vc injure him who was robbed or wounded, <:ji\ We ought then to dileover hin:i^ that lb he may Jay hold on the Robber, crV. and thereby may recover his Money, ctV. Thus Cha- rity requires us to dileover theVillain either to the Perlbn wrong'd,or to the Magiftrate. ^tb C ASK. Every one iVeely owns, that it is lawful to Ipeak ill of a falfe Religion ; that we may and even ought to retute Herefies • to ipeak againft thole who advance Propofi- tions that -aic falfc and capable of damaging a civil Society and the Church • to difcover Hereticks, that fo they may be guarded againft. Hence it is, that it was never tho't ill to refute Hereticks, who have Ipread abroad the Poilbn of their Errors. All the World is obliged to defend the Caufe of GOD, and this the Apoftles did exadly practice. St. Paul fays oi liymcncus and Phyletus^ iTim.1.17 j.|^^^ they had made 8h't^''v:rack of the Faith ; and according to theOpinion of ibme he argues againft their Sentiments of the Refurredion in his ift Epiji, to the Corhi- thians^ i 5th Chapter. And he lays of iTin: e^,^ol^Ci^^(^s^ tiiat he \\?n]foyfalcn him^ ha^s'nig lo^'Jcd this prejcnt ]] orLL In his Epiftlc to DEtRACriOK. IQI 9 to the Galatians he relates the Difference Sect. he had had with St. Peter^ and the Caufe ^^jj^^ of this Dificience, which was not advan- Gai, z. n, tageoiis to the latter. And verily St. Paul ^'' ^ ^''^* had good Rcaibn for his fo doing, becaufc it was to be iear'd thatmany for the Time to come as well as for the Time paft^ wou'd follow Peters Diihmulation : Now if he did not fpare an Apoftle when he went aftray, how much lefs Regard ought we to have to ordinary Teachers^ or rather to falfeTeachers,to walk in their wq'ongSteps ? St. Paul made no Difficulty to fpeak ill of ^ Tim. 4. one Alexander a Copper-Jmith^ ordering ^'^• y/A;;6>//y;to beware of him as ofanevilMan. As formerly among theJ^Tt^^^they cloathed l^^ j, ^^^ leprows Perfons with old tattcr'dGarments, that every one might know them by thefe Marks^and avoid them and their contagious Maladies, fo we ought to fet forth to view,s thole who publifh things contrary to the Word of GOD, and thus caufe their Senti-* mcnts to be hated. And if among the Romans, they ufed to ty a Lock of Hay to the Horns ol the O^ who was \vont to gore, that lb Perfons might keep out of his way, with much more Reafon we ought to let a Mark upon thofe, who by their impious Difcourfes would impofcupon the Publick,and lead them into Opinions more dangerous to the SouU than a puih of an Horn can be to the Body. Wc 1^1 u4 Threat ife again (I Sect. We muft only follow the Direcllon ^^^' which S. ^^ujiin gives, not to dilpute with ^"^"^^^^^ Invedives but with Realbns; not to treat with tlie Pcrlbn of our Adverfary,but with the Thing & Qncftion propofed. AMan's ill Lifemay'nt hinder his arguing veryjuftly. In aWord, we muft to our utmoft, feparate Hereticks from Herefies, condemning and hating their Herefies, but fparing their Perfons. ictb CJSE. ScDme may ask, Whether a Man ought to fuffer his Reputation to be torn to pieces ; or be deprived of fome other con- lidera^ie good, rather than injure his Ene- my's Reputation by fpeaking ill of liim, if he can't othcrways juftify and clear himfelf ? I anfwcr, that when the Advantage is im- portant, we oyghi to make no flick at dif- coveringthc Injuftice and Knavery o\ thole >vho would make us fuffer, altho' the fame fhoukl befall tliem. As will appear from thefe Real on?, I. Wc are to love our Neighbour no more th^n we rcafonably oughttolove our felves. Now wc fhould love ourNeighbour more th.an our felves, if we let our Inno- cence Inffcr by the Crime of our Enemies. z. The Apoitles thcmfelvts did not fail to difocver the ill Adions of others, to jiiftify themfclvcs. Wc liave an Inflance iiercof in St. John's 3d Epill. Vcr. 5), 10. DETRACTION. ipj t^wrotCy fays he, unto the Church *^ but DiothrepheSyUuho Joveth to have the Pre- eminence among them^ receiveth us not. Wherefore if I come ^ I "mill remember the Deeds which he doth^ prating againjt us fwith malicious Words ; and not content therewith^neither doth he himfelfreceive the Brethren^ and jorbiddeth them that would^and cafleth them out of the Church. For the well undeiftanding what may be inferred from this Paifage, we muft remark, That this Diotrephes was alive at the Time of the Apoftle's writing- that hede- clares thatthisMan committed evilAdions, that he aifures us, that if he come, he will lay them open in their particulars, and this in order to juftify himielf, as is exprelTed in thofe Words, Prating againfi us "with malicious Words. And it wa.s to clear him- felf from thofe things that were imputed to him by thefe malicious Words, that he wou'd lay open their Fallity, 3. Juftice it felf requires us to defend our Rights, when wc are unjultly accufcd. I Ihould then fin againft Jullice, if I fuf- fer'd my Innocence to be abufed, for fear of difcovering the Thievery and Injuftice of r thofe who rob me. Wou'd not this bepu- nilhing the Innocent infteadof the Guilty ; condemning the Righteous and juflifying the Wicked ? which, fays Solomon^ is ^/^i^o. 171^. jibomination to the Lord, This Ccnfidc- O ration 1 5>4 A freatlfc agatnfi Sect, ration flicws, that it is not againft Charity, ^'^- to expolc the Faults of another, rather than ^•""^^^^^ permit thcni to beunjuftly charged to one's ieir. For fince this wou'd be contrary to Jiillicc, for the lame Realbn it wou'd not bo contrary to Charity, which is never to take place till Juftice be fatisfied. We are ever to be jnft;, but we arc not always to be charitable to our Neighbour, at leaft when to iatisfy this Charity, we njuft fail in our Juftice and Charity to our felvcs. More- over, Virtues arc not oppofitc to each o- ther • and here we may apply what St, Paul laid on another Occafion, The Spit it 5 of I ccr. 14. the Prophets arefuhjeH to the Prophets , 3^- Virtues are fo llibjeft to Virtues, that they wou'd be no longer Virtues, if there were any contradiftion between them. 4.Part of tholeReafons we have allcdgcd to prove the lawfulncfs of expofing a Cri- minal maybe of Service heie. I fhan't here relate them, bccaufe you may call them to mindjOrconCidcr them in the Sedion where they arc. Having thvis flicwn that we may dilco- vertbc Sins of another tojuftify ourlclves ■^iVom any Crime laid to our Charge, or to rc-dcmand what was unjuflly taken iVom ws^ T dcfirc that live Things may be hccdfuUy oblervcd in this Affair, 1. That we do our utmoft that we may not be obliged to divulge thvFaults of thole who DEfRjcrion. f pj w^VX who wou'd injure es, or aclually have, in- Suct; jured us, by repreienting to them the In- ^^^ juftice of their Proceedings, and by endea- "^ vouring to periwade them to make us fa- tisfadion. So Chrift commands us in Maf. 1 8. 17. ver. and following. 2. That we make known the Injuries done us, only to thofe who ought to be informed of them, for our ownjuflification and fatisfaclion, and not to others who Can't fervc us therein^ 3. That we abftain from fpeaking of Injuries done us, if we think we can gain no good by fo doing. 4. We muft be on theDenfefive,without attacking others, and mufl; relate only what will ferve our owh Reputation or our other Advantages. 5. If the offence be but fmaU, we oughjt eafily to pardon it. 'Tis the Charaftcr of a great, heroic and chriftian-like Soul, to prefer the great Advantage of our Neigh- bour, to the lefler Advantage of our own felves. In all other Cafes it is lawful to defend one's felf juftly againft the Calumnies and Violences of others, provided we aiways follow the Rules of Benignity, Honefty and Moderation. We fliall become worlc than him we accufe, if for the little Injury he has done us, we do him as great a one to ruirx his Credit. ' O % Some j^a 'A freatife again [t Sect. Somc may perhaps fay, that when Sf. ^^^' P^/// fays, Charity feeketh mt it's ouofiy ''^"^'^^^^ he docs not allow us to preferve our own Goods at the Lofs of thofc of our Neigh- bour j fo that thereby what I advance is overthrown. But this proves too much, and confequently proves nothing. It wou'd truly follow from thence, that wc ought to iuffer Injuftice to reign on the Earth j that we ought to have no Concern for our Honour ; that we ought to introduce Vice into the World, and let the Wicked do fvhatthey pleafe- Abfurdities far from the Sentiment of that Apoftle or any other. St. Paul then here fpeaks of a Charity which for our Neighbour's Advantage will caufe us to lacrifice our Covetoufnefs, our Refentments, our Revenge, our Pride and Cur other evil Pallions. This Charity is not incompatible with what we firfl of all owe to our felves : It is jull and realbnablc and appears in this, that it is not without Regret that we are forced to hurt others to fave our fcIves : They who by thcfcVVords Vii\l9r-' of the V^^Xmi^J held my Peace c'-jcn from Good^ undcrftand, that David chofe rather to hme his Innocence, than to reveal the Injuftice and Perfccutions of his Enemies, mull hold that this Silence was far from the Principle I have cftablifhcd. But to them 1 muft fay, that I think their Inter- pretation is very far from the jTho't of the Plalmilt, DETRJCriON. »P7 Sect Pfalmift, who in fo many Places juftlfys Sect. himfelfof the Calumnies of his Enemies, ^'1- and has laid open their Malice and Sins. In a Word,lf it mull be underftood that he was filent and fpake not of his own Innocence, it was for Rcalbns which wou'd not con- tradid what we have alledged. For the Reafons already mentioned, It is lawful for Kiiigs, Princes and States who declare War againft others, to Ihew by their Manifeftoes, thejuftice of their Arms, that fb their Subjedsmay without fcruple ferve in their Armies. All thofe Reafons which fhould caufe anyPrincc to undertake aWar, as the Tranquillity and Liberty of their People; a juft Defence againit an unjuft and powerful Enemy,and all other Reafons, fhould lead them to declare, that they un- dertake the War juftly,altho' with Regret. So that if it be lavvful to wage War on certain Occafions, it is alfo lawful to fhew why it is undertaken. They muft only beware of injurious and provoking Words, and fuch like, which may fow Dilcord and are contrary to the Defign they fliould propofe in the War, which is only to ob-f tain a good and firm Peace thereby. For the fame Realbn it is lawful for Ad- vocates to let forth under the foregoingRe- ftridions, the Right which their Clients have to complaiu of the oppofite Party ; and for Magiftrates to declare the Caufe ^ O 3 why ijpS Jl Treatffe aga'nid Sect. \vhy they condemn any Man. This can't ^^^' be doubted of, fuppofing, as in reality it is, '^•^"''^^^^ lawful for a Man to defend his own Inte- refts and for a Magiftratc to condemn the Guilty. nth C/ISE. *Ti& a Queftion whether one had better not fpeak ill of aPeribn, than to let ano- ther Man lufFcr a Damage which he might avoid, if he were told that the Perlbn whole Company he frequents, is a Debauchee, a Cheat, £f6\ To this I anfwer, that we ought to ac- quaint a Pcrfon who is dear to us and with whom we have a Commerce, that he muft avoid the Company of a Debauchee, bc- caufc his Company may corrupt him ; and we fhould tell him of the Cheats of any with whom he converfes, cfpecially if he demand our Advice and Counicl as to what he ought to do. What makes mc embrace this fide is, that I fuppole the Cafe fo circumltanced, that we can't pleafure the one Party with- out injuring the other. Now 'tis certain, that we had better do fervicc to an honell Man who addrcfTes himlelf to us, than to a debauched, proud, vicious Pcllow. This is beyond Difpute. 2. In holding our Pence at fuch a Time v/c give Oceafion to the Wicked to exer- oili; their Rogueries and Malice, and to gutif/ DETRACTION. ^99 gratify their criminal Paflions. Everyone Sect. owns, that we ought to take the Sword Vii. out of a mad Man's Hand, \Yherewith he ^-^^VNJ may wound others ; lb alio we ought to diicover a Man's Vices, when we lear he will hurt others. Yet here we muft take Care of two Things, 1. We muft be very certain, that he " whom wc fpeak ill of before others^is really a great Cheat, a Rogue, ^c- 2. If it be more than probable, that the Rogue will not cheat and corrupt thofe. who frequent his Society, we ought not to difcredit him. I think this Reafon is beyond reply, namely. That it is moft cer- tain that by detracting we fliall wrong him, whereas according to ourSuppofition, it is not certain that he will injure thofe who ask ourAdvice&to whom we owe it. So that otherwife for a doubtful &C uncer- tain Evil, wc fhould do a certain one j which ought not to be. i2f/j CASE. As to Satyrs, my Opinion is, That they are very lawiul when they attack only Vices, without naming the Perfons which have thefe Vices. It is very advantage- ous and very profitable that the Folly and Enormity of Vice be difcovered ferioufly, or by pleafant Drollery. But it is very pernicious to difcredit Perfons, and enflamc them with Hatred and Wrath againft thole O 4 who aoo A freatife againji Sect. \vho expofc their Foibles. They \vho ^^^i}\lj name Pcilbns as well as Vices do plainly ihcw, that it is not the Love of Virtue which induced thciii to detra£V, but Vanity, Wrath or fume other evil Caulc. Wc have the Coniellion of the moft famous * Sa- tyrifls on our fide. I Ihan't flop to confute the contrary Opinion and the Rcafons and Excufes therefor which are no ways valid, and cfpecially when they are bro't by Chriftians, and when Chriftians arc the Ob- jefts pf thcle Sa^-yrs. x-^th CASE. Some may ask, Whether 'tis lawful to fpeak of thofeSins which Pcrfons glory in. This at firft feems a Paradox. What, fome w^ill fay, A:e there any Perfons fo impious and daring as to glory in their ownCrimes ! 'Tis hard, I own, for thofe who know but little of the World, to believe that it is thus. But alas it is too true ! Are there not Men, or may I fay Devils incarnate, !u\^ ^t ^""'^^ S^^^y Ji^ ^i"^^'ir Faculty at Dcbauchini^ others; who bragof their Cruelty and their Excefs in Wine, £rV. Some will demand, Whether it be a Sin to publifti what they I — ♦ Archilochum proprio Uabies armavit Jambo. Hot at. Ars 'Poetic a, J.* Arcleur dc fc ir.onrrer, ou plutoc de mcdirc, Anna h v^rirc du Vers dt la Satire. ^oilcau ylrt. ^oetiq^iQ. thcmlclvc^ DETRACTION. ^ot jthemfelves pabllfh. I anfwer, That I am Sect.' not of the Mind of thole Cafuifts, who ^^^• think that it is not ; and on the con- trary,! think thefc Crimes fhould be con* eealed, 1. Becaufe tho' fuch a Men take Plca- fure in relating theii ovvnDebaucheries,yet they wou'd be very uncafy to have others fpeak of 'em. 2. We ought not to help another in deftroying his Honowr, even as we ought not to aid his in deftroying and ruining himlelf. 3. The Knowledge of thefeThings muft needs be very pernicious and fcandalous to thofe who hear us fpeak ot 'em. 4. If they ftrive to outgo ordinary Sin- ners in Vice, that fo the World may talk of 'em, then the mentioning them wou'd but gratify &C encourage 'em in their f oolifli Vanity and their Crimes ; whereas perhaps they wou'd refrain if they faw we diidaind to talk of their Vices. 14th CASE. It may be enquired, Wherher it be law- ful or indifferent for a Man to fpeak ill of liimfelf? There are but few Perfons will do this, but yet there are fome who pretend hereby to give undeniableEvidcnces of their Sincerity^ or elfe who wou*ddo honour lo their Vices, as has been Ihewn in the fore- going Article. To 101 A T'reatife againjl Sect. To I'cfolve this Queftion, We may fay la VII. general, that a Man ought not fo to do, ^"^'^'^'^'^ becaule it is ordinarily a bragging of De- bauchery or Indifcretion,or an Itcli of talk- ing, or a Weaknefs of Wit, which makes one choofe rather to fpeak ill of himfelf than to be filent, or fome other evil Source, which are the Caufcs why he difcovers his own Defefts. The whole of it then may be reduced to this, whether it be lawful to be a greatBabler,to be indifcreet,imprudent, impudent, and weak-headed : which no one will approve of. Thefe Caufcs then being evil, they can produce no good. 0.. The Evil we fay of our felves may fcan- dalize others, and therefore to be abl\aineJ from. 3. We are obliged to take care of our own Reputation. I fay neverthelefs, that in certain Cafes when our fins have been publick, we may confefs and condemn them before thole who may be fcandalized at them • and then this Confcflion is Part of the Repentance which we teftify for our Faults. So David in PfaL 51. confeffed both his Adultery and Homicide. We may alio confefs Sirs to thofc Friends from whom we think to receive Inftrudions proper to lave us from falling into them again ; or laftly, to thoic whom we have offended, by owning our Faults to them and asking their forgivcncfs. Except in thcfc Cafes, let us be content to confefs DEfRyiCTlON. 203 confefs our Sins to GOD, to repent of 'cm, Sect. and to reform. ^^^• 15th CASK. ^^^^ Some may ask, Whether it be not law- ful to Ipeak of a Man's ill Qualities, after having fpoken of his good ones ? I anfwer abfolutely, No. Becaufe his Virtues won't do him fo much honour as his Vices will difhonour. We are obliged to be lioncft Men and good Chriftians. Such as are lb, are no more than what they ought to be, fo that there is not much Merit therein. Whereas we are forbidden to be wicked and vicious, and this is the Reafbn why Vices hurt the Vicious and marr their Credit and Fortune. On the other Hand, Men are more inclined to believe evil thangood,and to hate a Man for his Vices, than to love him for his Virtues. Befides, if we Ihew that a Man has as many or more imperfec- tions than he has commendable Qualities, it plainly fhews that he is a very iniperfedl Chriftian. Now to be but an imperfect good Man, is to be Vicious : Imperfection, Indifference, Luke-warmnefs, Halting be- tween GOD and the World, are Thirgs which pafs for Sins in holy Writ, and thus wa do a very confiderable Evil to their Reputation. 16th CASE. It may be asked perhaps, Whether it be finful barely to tell one's Opinion ( whcu ■ - — ■■' wc ao4 A Trcatifc againji I Sect, we arc defired to do it ) concerning any ^^^' Aftion of our Neighbour, which is finful ^'^"'^^and blameablc? I anfvver, No. Becaufe it is never lawful to call Vice, Virtue ; and becaufe wc Ihould never lye. Moreover in praifing an evil Aftion, we Ihall lay a Foundation for thofe who hear us, to imi- tate what they hear commended, which is contrary to the Inftrudion to Sincerity and the Love we owe otliers. We muft always tr*.?' 20. call Evil, Evil. \yth CASE. It may be asked, What we are to do, when in order to clear one Man, we are obliged to accufe another ? I anfwer, that in fuch a Cafe we are to juftify the Inno- cent, altho' we ftiould be forced to hurt the other, and this becaufe we ought rather to ferve a good Man than a wicked Man, as has been before obferved. It muft be here remarkt with reference to the Doubts wc may be in, If fach and fuch Words are Sins of Detraftion,wc muft choofc, the more general and more furc, which is no Detracting. And thus we muft cut the Knot when we can't unty it. 18//; CASE. Since there arc many Exceptiens in par- ticular Cafes, {oxws: may ask, Whether there be not alio Exceptions in Pcrfons, that is, whether there be not fome fo vile 2v abject in thcii: Condition, that wc may without fin^ DEfR^CflQN. 20S fin fpeafc ill of 'cm. 'Tis the Opinion of Sect: fome Authors and Popilh Cafuifts, that it ^^^• is fo, but this is not mine. For, v^v^^j 1. S. Paul is exprefs hereupon. He fays we ought to fpeak ill of no Man ; no Tit. 3. z; one of the humame Race, of what Conditi- on foevcr he may be. He forbids detrac- ting not only Powers, hut even univerfally any Man. 2. He tells us to do good to all Men ; we muft then fpeak ill of no Man, fince if we detrad from any Man we do not do good at all or to all. He requires us alfp to prefent to GOD Prayers, Requefts and Supplications for ali Men ; we muft not then backbite any Man, which is fo oppo- lite to the Prayers and Supplications he mentions, and which we ought to prefent to GOD for all Mankind. 3. GOD has no Refped to the Appca- i Pet.M7i ranee of Perfons, becaufe All are the Work of his Hands; thus the Quality ofthcDe- trador and the Meanncfs of the Detradtcd, do not at all alter the Detraclion in Reali- ty. Befidcs that properly fpcaking, there is no Chriftian rile, after having been bought with fo high a Price, as that of the precious Blood of Jcfus Chrift. In fine, our Saviour himfclf teaches us l^,)c. j^jt in the Parable of the Samaritan wounded 31. & feat by RobberSjthat neither the miferableState of Meo^ nor tbc Difference of Religion, nor ac6 \A freatife agatnd Sect, nor that of a Country, Ihould hinder U3t ^^^- from looking upon them all as our Neigh- ^^^^'"^ hours, and from doing them good as luch. li^tb CASE. Laftly, It may be enquired, Whether Ignorance of a Fact or ot Right does not hinder Detradion from being a Sin, when it is the Effed of either Ignorance? This Qneftion is of great Importance,\vheretore we fhall make Ibme Stop here, and begin with thelgnorance of Right ^ and as every one perhaps don't well comprehend the Signification of thefe Terms, we fliall ex- plain them. By the Ignorance of Right we intend, an Ignorance in a Man, that Detradion is a Sin ; and by Ignorance of Fad, we intend anignorance that what we are fpeak- ing againlt our Neighbour, is a Detradion. V And to begin with the hift Sort. This Ignorance does not hinder Detradion from being a Sin, fince it is only infurmountable Ignorance, and whereol it is impoflible to get rid, which, can cxcufe Sinners be- fore GOD. Now 'tis certain that this Ig- norance is not invincible. This is proved, becaufe Detradion is oppofite to thatPrin- ciplc of Juftice which the Creator has en- grarcn on tlic Hearts of all Men, which confifts in doing to others as we wou'd be done by. Far then from being invincible, we need but dclcend into our own Hearts, and DEfRAGTlON. ^07 and look into our own Confclenccs, to Sect, know, that Detraftion, being oppofitc to '^^^• this Principle, is a Sin againlt the Law of ^^"^^^^ Nature. That this Ignorance is not iw- vincible may be proved from this, that & Rom. 1.30 Faul in his Epiftle to the Romans^ places Detraction in the Rank of the Sins of the Heathen, whole whole Law was only that of Nature • now if this Ignorance cou'd not excufe them, how fhould it excufe Chriftians, that have lb much Light which the others had not ? There are, I own, fome of the Cafes, v.hich we have examined in this Sedion, about which it is more ealy to bemiltaken, and which demand Knowledge and Judg- ment and which leem in fome Meafurc to excufe theFaults we fall into byDetraftion, when we ought not to ^ inafmuchas there are Exceptions to the general Rule that wc ought not to detracV. To this I anlwer, That there are few of ^hefe Cafes but what we may oar felvcs get oVer by a littlcAttention, and by the Help of GOD's Word. 1. Reafon itlelf didates, that we ought t© be filent and not detrad, when we are in doubt whether it be a Sin to do it in that particular Cafe. As to Ignorance of Fad, I hold, that it is utterly impofliblc That fhould excufe it. For who does not know whether he fpeaks ill of his Neighbour, whether he hurts his Reputation iioS A Treatife againji Sect* Reputation, or no, and in a Word, ^vhcther I y^^' he lays good or ill of him ? ^"^^^^^"^ From Nvhat has been faid, it follows^that it wou'd be a very ill Way to excufe De- trail ion, to fay, I did not believe^ or I did not know that fuch a Difcourfe "was a Sin or aDetradtion. One part of his Ignorance is impoiTiblc,the other maybefurmounted. Neither of 'cm then can fcrve for an Ex- cufe. All that is done without Faithjthat is, without a Perfuafion that what we do is good, is a Sin, but contrary wtle, all that Pom, 14, is done with this fort of Faith, is not a ^^* Virtue nor an Excufe. 10th CASE. One may ask. Whether it be lawful to reveal a Secret that may be hurtful to the Perfon that faid or committed, certain Things that cannot be difcovcred without ruining his cr her Charaftcr, when at the fame time the Knowledge of that Secret is ulcful to another Perfon ? I anfwer, that if I krow that Secret only by means of the Perfon that has intrufted me with it, it is plain, thatjuftice, which in all Cafes is to go before Charity,obliges me not to dilco- vcr it, and that confequcntly whatever Advantage might acrue by it to another by fpcaking, I am to be filcnt and not re- veal the Secret. In fliort, if any religious, natural or any other Duty obliges mc to be more tender of t) E 7" R j4C r 10 K. 5^ of pne Perfon than that of anothers, if two Sect; Perfons are not equally concerned in my Vil. * Ipeaking or my filenccj if by fpeaking or ^-''^^^ not fpeaking, I do more good to the one than to the other, thcie or fuch like Con- fiderations ought to be our guides in fuch Cafes as thefe, where People arc afraid o? afting againft that great Rule and excellent Virtue, Charity, and hurting unavoidably Ibmebody by their filence as well as by theii' Ipeaking, and in which fo much equality appears. For it is very fcldom but that ©ne may find in the Things themfelvcs, or the outward Circumltancss which accom- pany them, fome Reafons that may help to refolve his Doubts, and make his Choice, the' the Danger feems to be equal of both fides, and the Reafons ot that Danger, have lecmingly an equal force. After all it is impoffiblc to refolve all Cafes. As human Aftions are almoft inr- finite, fo there is avaftNumber ofCircum- ftances that may vary thofe Aftion?, and therefore there is an infinite Number of poffible Combinations of all thofe Things and every one of thcfe Combinations pro- duces a particular Cafe j in all which Cuiea there are great many Dangers to be avoid- ed, and many Cautions are to be taken, in order to judge and ad rightly • for the' we may find the Dccifion ofthemin tlie\Vord of GOD; yet even that Dccifion requires a ' p long 210 A Treatife dgatnft Sect, long Chain of Reafonings and Thoughts,, ^^^' which generally include very obfcurePro- ^•^-W pofitions and long Difcuflions. And often \vc have but Prob^ibilitys to judge by, in %vhich Cafe we mull chufc thole that Iccm the moft agreable to the Glory of GOD, and the good of our Neighbours. The Ufes of this SeBion. "ITZHat \vc have faid as to the various ^^ Cafes whereinDetraftion is not a Sin, far from favouring it, docs moft vehe- mently urge againft it. The Exceptions we have eftablifhed, far from being advan- tageous to it, do give it the laft Blows, and fcrve to confirm the general Rule, which forbids Dctrafticn, according to that Axiom of Philofophers, £xr^^//6' /?r- mat Regulam. And truly Exceptions Ihew, That all which is not excepted, is contained in the Rule we ought to follow? and is very certain and beyond all doubt. You may bcfides this have obferved, that there arc Exceptions to Exceptions, which return after this Manner into the general Precept, Not to dctracl, and confequcntly there are without Comparifon more Occa- fions wherein we ought not to detract than wherein we may do it. In bETRACriON. nil In fine, take Care to keep exactly with- Sect. in thcLimits and Bounds we have marked, v:i. and in which Detraftion may be lawiul, ^'^^^r^. fince if you ever lb little exceed thclc Li- mits, you enter into the Path of Injuftice and Sin ; you eat the forbidden Fruit, and enter into the Devil's Empire, whole Sub- jeds and Slaves you become. J!i & & Si Sf & & 4ff cS? & ^ <$? ^ ^ •?* rf? M^ ^ *?> 'T> S» SECTION VIII. Anfwers to the O.hjeBions made in Javour of Detrauiion. ©©^^0LL that we have hitherto ®^@'SiS^ faid againft Detradion, wou'd ^® ^ #@ be perhaps to little purpoic, if ll^^gwelhoa'dnotanfwerthcOb- %^%m% jedions which are made to au- thorize and uphold this Sin. We know how ready a Man is to deceive himfelf, how he loves an Error that flatters him, and what Efforts he needs to make him renounce it. From thence it arifcs, that altho' we prefent him with thcTruth in all its Light, he endeavours to elude its Force, and to obfcure its Evidence by a thoufand Pretences, Excufcs and Sophifms, which he oppofes thereto, that fo with fome Colour he may continue in his vicious aia ^ Treatlfe agalnfi Sect. Bias. Pcrfuaded of this, \vc go on in this VII. Dilcourfe to take away the Vails under which Dctraflors lurk ^ and to force the Walls where they lye entrenched, by an- fwering thcObjeftions they bring inFavour of this dear Idol. /. Some fay that Detraftion is very ufeful to kecpPerfonsto theirDuty, becaufe when Jthey know their Conduct is decryed on Accoant of their Vices, they will do their ntmoft to get rid of 'em, that fo they may give no Caufe for Infamy and Difhonour which are the Fruits of an irregular Life ; awd thus Detradion, far from being con- trary to Charity, is a true Charity. To this I anfwer, i. That if it were Charity that makes any Man fpeak ill of others, he wou'd not do it in their Abfence, as is very ordinary. To them he would addrcfs himfelfto difcover theirFaults, that lo they n>ight amend them. To them alore I lay, wou'd he addrcfs himfclf, and wou'd acl after a quite different Manner from what he docs, to make them perceive theWrong there is in abandoning thcmielves to their Pafrions,and thclnjury which they do them. \\c wou'd go and converfc with them in Private, and with mildntfs wou'd lay all thefe Tilings open to their View, and re- prove them in a Chriftian manner. z. That DET'RACriON. 213 2. That this Way of Ading is very op- Se:- polite to Charity, appears from hence, that 2^1 Charity covers all, even the nioft publick ^ Things, whereas Detraftion diicovers all even the moft fccret Things. On this Principle of Dctrafting to keep Pcrfons to their Duty, we may alfo kill them by our own Authority, to hinder them from com- mitting any more the Sins on Account whereof we detradlfrom ^eu)^ which every one fees is the laft Abfurdity. Befides thisjl fay thatDctraction is no way proper to correft the vicious. If it be thro' Vanity, Pride or Jealoufy that you fpeak ill of 'em,do they not fee in you Examples of Vice, which may icrve them, altho' without Reafon, as Motives to continue in their own Vices, in their Ambition, in* their Self-Love, &Cc. Don't think that they won't difcover what it is, that makes you tear them in pieces ? Do you think to make Petfons more piows and devout by giving thcmOseafions to hate you, to loatii you and to hurt you as you hurt them ? Don't we every Day fee by Experience, that they whofeFaults liavc been oncedii- cover'd and publiflicd, far from repcntinix, do many Times become more wicked, and as a Recompcnce for a loft Reputation, do give themfelves up to all Sorts of criminal Pleafarcs ':* They no longer mind a g'xd which they have bit, and give thcmiclvcs Pa up a 1 4 ^ Trcatife again !i Sect, -up publickly to their vicious Inclinations* ^'^^' Many do even pcrfuadc thcmfclvcs^ thac ^""^^ there is more Shame in repenting, than in pcrfifting in their Faults. How then can you hope to corrcft one Vice by another, that is, to convert Sinners by finning your Iclf thro' your Detractions ? As by Violence and Periccution Men never make true Converts and good Pro- lelyteSjlo we never make Perfons the bet- ter by tearing their Reputation. We may perhaps engage 'cm to hide their Crimes better, and to lave appearance better : But that is all. Add to this, that ifDetraftion hinders ibme Faults, it produces an infinite Number of other Sins, as wc have Ihewn when we laid open its Effeds. Some again objccl and fay, that by {hew- ing the Hatcfulnefs of Sin in thofc who go on therein^ we engage others to be upor; their Watch that they fail not into thole Difordcrs, which luined thofc whom we cite as IZx2n:plcs. But 1 anfwcr, iliat riicrc are many other aiid more effectual Ways to n^akcMcn quit Vice. Can V e not, if wc pieale, cite to them the lorrowiul Fx'amplc of Sinners who have even in this Woild born the Pu- nifiiment of their Sins, and Nvhofe Hiftory is contained in the holy Sciipturr, which prcfcnts to our Eyes and as aHve, th.fc >vhom it fpcaks of? So certain and un- doubted D E r R y^ C T 10 N. doubted is it! Can't we lay open to their View all thofe great Motives which tlic Scripture prefents us withal, to make us embrace Virtue ? 'Tis ftill further Objcclcd, that they who are not as yet plunged in Vice, by fee- ing that the Wicked lofc their Reputation thereby, are kept to their Duty thro' fear of the like Evil. I anfwer, that they who have no other Motive which hinders them from doing Evil, than this Fear ofMen, do even in this already commit Sin, fince GOD requires that it be a Fear of difpleafing him which mull urge us to Duty. They are true Hypocrites who do good only thro' Con- lideration of the World. They prcfcrve their outlidc, but the infide is Evil, fincc were it not thro' fear of what the World weu'd fay or do, they wou'd make an open Profeffion of Libertinifm and Debauchery. Moreover, we muft not imagine, that alL thofe who do not fear GOD enough to purify their Heart, who do not fiifficlei.tly ftand in awe of that mighty GOD, who can phmge them into miferics Eternal, will fear more the Evil which the World can do them by taking away their Reputation ? //. A fecond Objcclion, or rather a fccond Excufe which is bro'c to juflily Detraction, cr to Icflcn the Sin, is, tliai it vvc do not r 4 Ipcak s,\6 A frealffc againji Sec^. fpcak ill of our Neighbour, efpecially when ^^^^^' ethers in the lime Company do it, wc fhall '^'"'^^^'^^ be looked upon as ridiculous, dull, ftupid, contradictory, Men-Haters, and Perions of an ill-contrived Spirit. I anlwpr to this, Firji^ That if it be a Sin to abftain from Evil only thro' humane ConfiderationF,it is a grcaterSin to do Evil thro' fear of palling among Men for a ftupid Blockhead. Secondly, The Profeffion of Chriftians obliges them to bear the Crofs ^ to fuffer Shame and Contempt and all that is vexa- tious in this World, when the Glory of GOD requires it and his Commands prc- jcribc it • fo that confcquently wc ought to endure with Tatience, yea with Joy, all that Men can fay to our Difadvantage on this Account. ' T'hirdly^ Our filence can't much hurt our Reputation, for it is certain, that not only pious Peribns but in general all thofe that liave any Judgment, far from defpifing,will eftccm us, and look upon us as prudent l^erfons, who will not expole our fclvcs to all the Vexations whicla Detraction expofcs its Partifans unto. Fourthly^ They who do detract are often- times Perfons of the leaib W it. The more they dttra£t, the more they fliew their Want of aFund, and that they can produce no'j'.^j' of thvir own. For where is the rxcd DEf.RJCTlON. ciy T\zt4 of Wit to dctrad ? The moft ignorant, fiUy und fooiifh Fellow alive, has Ability enough to tell theFaults which others have committed ? Is there need of long Study, and the Knowledge of Tc^gucs, to dctratt? Mail he be well verfcd in all Sorts of Li- terature whatever, to backbite ? If there bc need of Wit to rail agreeably, as tliey fay, it were better to be without that Wit, inafmuch as this railing and deriding Wit comes only from the Devil. Let us know, That altho' we cou'd fpeak as the nioft Learned and Eloquent among Men, yea asAngels,yet we are nothing if we have not Charity, according to S. Paul. iCor,i3,i< You fay that if you don't detract with Detractors, you pafsfor ridiculous Perfons • but they might as well call all thofe ridicu- lous, w-lio read G O D ' s Word and go to Church' for Inftruftijn ' Is it then more ridiculous to profit by Exhortations,than to read and hear them ? Verily they are niorc ridiculous themfclves, who for this treat others as ridiculous. You fay, you Ihall pafs for Men-Haters and Perfons of an ill- contrived Spirit. But pra}^, who is a AJi- fanthrapoSj if it be not a Man wlio hates Society and Men- ( which is the Etymo- logy of the Word ) and who hates Mon more than thofe who backbite cm ? Let Men call you Perfons of an ill- contrived Spirit : but who has an ill- turned Spirit, if a 1 8 ji T'reatifc againd Sect, he who turns his towards Evil ScDetraftlon* ^ywjv has not ? ^^'^^'^'^ Let Men call youcontrtdidlory ^ but who is more fo than a Detractor, who contra-« dids his neighbour'sBenefit ; who fpeaks ill of him, in Oppofition to thofe who fpeak well of him, and who repeatsMen's Actions and blames them in their Abfence ? Suppofe you fliould pafs for an Hypo- crite ; had you not better pafs for fuch a one unjuftly and among unrighteous Pcr- fons, than to pafs for a Detrador juftly ? Let us endeavour to do w^hat GOD orders us, and afterward let us not care for what Men may fay of us. This is thcAnfvver I wou'd make to thofe who may reply,that when we give Occalion to others to eftecm us Hypocrites, we are Caufes gf their ralh Judgments and theii Lyes. It is true,that as far as it lyes in our Power, wx ought not to give caule hereof, but fiill we mull not Sin to pleafc them ; befides that in this Cafe, they who do not detradi are but very innocent Caufes of the ill Judgment of a- nother. Laftly, If for fear of giving Occafion to the Judgments of others, wc mull ;ilways Study to pleafc them, wc fhould be very milerablc by rcafon of the Pains wc muit put our felves to, and becaufe of the utter iniponibility of ever attaining thereto : For it is utterlv imnofliblc to pleafc all the World. ' ^ ' This DETRACriON. 219 This laft Objeulion was grounded upon Sect. cur fear of the Judgments of Men j the ^'^^^^• next is grounded upon their Example and ^■^'''^'^^' Authority. Some fay, 'tis very hard not to imitate what we fee pradifed every Day ; and that we muft allow fomething for Ulc & Cul- tom and other Things of that Nature. 'Tis aftonifhing that Chriftians fliould talk at this Rate. What then, do not they who bring thefe Things for an Excufe, ac- cufe themfelves of infringing on GOD's Commands, which fo frequently forbids us to follow a Multitude to do E'vil^ or to Rem. n: conform our /elves to this prefent evil mrld.ox to love the mr Id ? Can any one ^ 5°^" •' be ignorantj that we are not to judge ac- cording to that wicked Law^but according to the Laws of GOD's Word,whofe Max- ims ought to be theRules of all others, and to be preferred before them ? If we ought to follow Cuftom in the Matter of De- tra(Sion, then we ought alfo to be Swear- ers, Perfidious, Impure ; in a Word we ought to hav^e all other Vices which reign in the World, as well as Dctraftion ; and even all thofe which arc quite oppofite to each other, as Avarice and Prodigality, be- caufe we fee thefe Vices bear an equal iway in the World. 13o 420 A freatife againji Sect. Be not miftaken, the generality of a Sin ^^J^J][^ does never excule it. They Ihan't fuffcr a ^"^"^yy^ whit the lefs in Hell for having many Com- panions in Milery • alfo on Earth we do notfm a grain the Icis for being with a great Number of Sinners. By Virtue of what,may we difpenfe with Duty thro' Cuftom ? Is it a Rule it felf ? Has Cuftom any right to publifli Men's Sins ? And if it has not, How can it give Detraftors a Right which it never had it Digef. felf ? l^emo ad alium tratisferre pteji Ai"c.j*-^/^^j jtfc^is quam hahet ipfe. On the contrary, It is the Number and Multitude ofSinners which more provokes GOD. Becaufe all the City oi Sodom \\2iS plunged in Wickednefs, except the Family oiLoty and becaufe Ten righteous Perfons, were not found in this abominable Place, therefore GOD was obliged to reduce it to Allies, in a Way as contrary to Nature as their Sins were. It is not with GOD as with Men. A Prince is many Times con- ftrained to grant a geiieiai Pardon to a whole People which rofc up againft him, becaufe he is not powerful enough to re- duce 'em to Obedience by force of Arms, or becaufe otherwife he would dcftroy his Dominions and fee himfclf a King v^ith- oat Subjects. But GOD has more thah Power enough to CKtirpatc his rebellious Creatures, and in their Itcad to laifc hira- fclf DEfRjlcriON. Zit felf Children from the very Stones in the Sect; Street, MaUh. 3. ^. VJir. St. PeUr followed the Multitude whcn^'*'^*^'''^ he fuffer'd the Remains of the ceremonial Law of Mojes^ to abide in Chriftianity. But did this hinder St. Paul from reprov- ing him to his Face and with warmth ? and yet there was only Imprudence in thcCon- dud of the Apoftlc PeUr. How then can Uih & Cuftom excufe thofe in whom wc meet with a deep Malignity ? I wou*d now ask Chriftians, If they were among the American UoldXcis^ who wor- Ihip and invoke the Devil, Whether they wou'd do the fame thing, efpecially ifthey were not forced to it ? Doubtlefs, No, or clfe they would ceafe to beChriftians. The Number audMultitude of thofe whom they faw worftiipping the Devil, would net ex- cufe them. So, tho' in ^merka^ Europe^ and in other Parts of the World, there are ^^j^ thofe who follow the DoBrhies of Devils '"'**^' with regard to Detraftion, and who pay incenfe to this Idol ; yet for all this, they who imitate them are not the lefs blamea- ble. On the contrary, The more Vice rules, the more we ought to oppofe it. The more a Torrent fwell sand rages, the more hafty ought we to be in railing Dykes to flop its Waves. Far from leading a Per- fon on by our wicked Exajnple, wc ought ftrongly to withftand thofe of others. "" Here ft a 2 A "freatife agamji Sect. Here you will fay, What can a few Ex- VIII. amplesdo againll an almoft uniVerfalCor- ^•^^^^^^^ ruption ? I anfwer, Firft, This Corruption wou'd not be fo univeifil, if Men followed my Advice. Still further, altho' our good Examples do not extend very far, yet they willbeof ufe to thofc who know us. They will ftrengthen and comfoit good Perfons, and many Times will put Detradors to iilcnce. Believe me, Vice is cowardly ; it triumphs only when it finds thofe that favour ir • but it dares not appear before Virtue, to which it ever docs Homage : Suppofe even that yourVirtue does no good to others, yet it will at Icaft ferve your felves, by helping your Salvatior, Men mull, fay fome, follow the Stream. I fay,Let them follow theCroud : Let them enter in at the wideGate, and at the End of theirCarrier,attheEndoftheirJourney,they will find themfel ves i n the Abyfs, theLake of FireandBrimftone. Sinceyouchufetopleafe theDevil2<: wicked Men,rather thanGOD, you Ihall go away with thofe whom you loved to pleafe. Don't flatter your felves, that you can ferve GOD and the World M»t.6. 24- too. A^^ Man can [ewe tixio Majlers^ e- fpecially Maflers fo opposite and different as thefe arc. IV, Some objeft and fay, That if we mayn't dctrad, we fliall have nothing to fay in Company DUfRACTIOlS!. aii Company, and fhall be obliged to talk of S^ct. the Weather, and luch trifling things, which ^X!^ would fpoil all the agrceablcnefs of Con- verfatioM. I anfwcr, 'Tis a great Error to think we fhall have nothing to talk of, for in Religion, in humane Learning, and in civil Affairs, there are an infinite Number of Things, that may be talked of to E- dification, or at leaft without Scandal. But after all, it is better to talk of the Weather, than of things which may hurt both our felves and our Neighbours. Still further. Detractors are for the moll part great Talkers about nothing, and difcourfe only of Trifles, and are fo much theworfe Authors, inafmuch as what they produce is not from their own Stock. Moreover, This Excufe is only a Pre- tence to cover a Man's Malignity, and the true Principle he ads from. And indeed, were it only to upholdConverfation,wou'd BotDetraftors be content to fpeak of Faults, without naming and fhewing the Pcrlbns in whom they are found ? In fine. If you arc induced to detract by the Company of Detractors, who turn all the Difcourfe this way, you mull avoid them ; and if you are with virtuous Pcrfons, you may fpeak of Subjeds proper for Edi- fication and againft Detraftion it fclf. Ali the agreeablenefsandpleafure ofCon- Verfation, fay fome, isfpoiled by rcfrain- >i 24 \4 Treatife agawji Sect, ing Raillery & Detraftion. I arifwer^that yj^^i. this Pleallirc is by no means clTcntial to ■^^^^^^ Converlation, fincc it may have much more agreable Plcalur^s, and that even Pcrions who have any GoQdnels at all, do find no Plcafure in Detradion. I add. That a Man has incomparably more Plealurein the Sen- timent of his own Innocence, than in the Enjoyment of this brutifh Paftime. The P.emorles which Detractors feel for the GommiiTion of this Sin, and the Sorrows v.hich lay hold of them in the Hour of Dcdth,and their eternal Damnation, if they do not feel the Sorrows of a Repentance whiclimay appeafeGOD,makethemknow, that all thele fliort Plcalbres which they have taken in Raillery, are like the Book which the Prophet Ezekiel fwallowed,that was/u?^^/- in bis Mouthy but ^ithtnJtiU of Curfes^ fVoes ^ Mijeries : Not to Freic.t 10. niention here the Enmities 6C Difgracea from Men, which they meet withal. K Some fay, that we fliould lofc theCom- pany of many Perfons who oblige us only, becaulc we willingly hear theirDetradions, or divert them with ours. But what matters it in the End, if we do lole tlic Company of thole who are not cur true Friends, Iceing 'tis only a criminal Complailance we have for them jthat makes them clcAVctQ ui^ What matters it to iQlc lofe the Company of thofe whom we muft Sect. ioon forfake, if th^y don't forfake us firft ? ^^^^• What Good ftiall w^ get by their Society, ^'''^'^^ if it draws on us the Hati^ed of thofe whom they and we fpeafc ilj ot^ . Some jiHagine to fay much in favour of Detraftion^ by alledging that ve have in the Bible many Examples of piou? Pcrfons who have detradcd. Without cmring at prefent into an Examination of cac'iv Paf- iage in particular that may be bro't to jrovc their Affcrtipn, we fiiall only remark in genera], i. That the greateft Part of tl.oft whom the holyScripture Ipeaks ill cf,werc dead, and fo to detrad from them was qo Sin. 2. That David and other holy Per- fons were infpired by the Lord, who re- vealed to them, that the Heart of thcfc whom they fpake ill of, was never to be converted -and that they detracted atGOD's Command^ whereas we have no fuch In- fpirations. What fufficiently Ihcws, tliat it was by cxprefs Orders from this great Matter, which Orders we cannot apply to us, is this, that they themfelves condemn Detraftioa 3-. That they were not with- out Sin in their Adions, and that if there ht ariy particular Evil in theirCondud, we ought not to imkate it. 4. That they did thui many Times,- for their oWnVindication ^ kt the Good of the Church. As it is Q^ certain^ 116 A freatife againjl SficT. certain, that theDifciplcs of our Lord^who ^^^^' in their Writings have fet forth their own ^•'^"^'^^ Defects or thofe ofoth^rs, without any evil Ends in view, and without ading from bad Principles, have ^:ven great Proofs of their Sincerity, in tNt they did notfparc thcm- felves, nor t^e chief Doftors of the Reli- gion they fcad embraced ; and by this Sin- cerity, agreat Proof of the Truth of that Religiai* In fine, If they did detraft, it was oi: Occalions whereDetraction was law- ful, and in Cafes fet forth in the preceding Sedbn. In vain one makes ule of the Authority of the Scripture for Detraftion, fince it is condemned fo ftrongly by it. riL Some will fay, That if we don't detrad, when we hear a Man's Faults told of, we fhall pafs for fuch as favour the Faults. I anfwer. That this is a groundlefs Fear,fince he who then fays nothing,is as much on the fide of thofe who blame, as of thofe who are blamed : For fometimes he who is not jdu'iir' ^S^'"^^ ^h *s for us, as fometimes he who is not for us is againft us. I add, That wc ought, as farasrealbnably may be, not only be filent, but to take the Part of the Abfcnt and leave others raflily to judge what they pleafc. nil. Some fu% Is it not known that every one has his Failings, and what matters it then DEtRj4CTlON. ^^y then fliould we reveal on this Subjeft what Sect. no Perfoncanbc ignorant of <" Vlll. I confefs that all Men have their Faults, and that all the World is agreed in this ^ But this large and general Knowledge which we have of other Men's Faults, docs no Man any harm, becaufe we dgn't know what are his particular Failings. And yet it is thofe particular Faults which deftroy a Perfon's Credit. It docs not hurt any Per- fon to know that he is a Man, altho' wc know that there are always Faults 6C Im- perfedions attached to the humane Nature here below ; But it will hurt any one to know that he has committed a Sin which Diflionours him, that he has onfome Occa- Iions been imprudent, that he hasfometimes a(3:edwith to much Warmth, and fo of the relt. This is whatDetraclion difcgvers and whereby it does more hurt, than a general and confuled Knowledge, Befides this, wc know that there are many Degrees in this Frailty and this Corruption : We may think fuch a Man is lefs vicious than others ; But Detraftion which ftiews the contrary, does malicioufly take away this good, or rather, lefs difadvantageous Opinion we had of fuch or fuch Perfon. IX. Some willfay, Is it not lawful to tell the Truth and confequcntly to detraft, fince in Detraction we tell the pure Truth ? 12 A Treatife againfi Sect. Tis true, our Thoughts and Words ^^^^- Ihould agree, this iseffential to Truth, but ^-^^^^^ we fhoald not tell all that we think, or all that we know. We ought not lye, but wc V ought to be filent as to certain Truths. Who will dare to fay, that it is lawful to reveal a Secret trufted to us, and which wou*d be hurtful toa Perfon, under pretence that what we reveal is true ? Neverthelefs, in molt Occafions of Life, the Defefts of our Neighbours ought to be as a Secret which God himfelf requires us to keep. In a Word, Detraftion is a Truth which we ought not to reveal, either in the Mattii. 10. Ear or on the Houfe To^. Some will fay, That if we do not pub- lifh the dilhonefty or ill Pradice of a Per- fon, all the World will be millaken in him, and truft their Interefts with him, if Peo- ple are not told of the Evils he may do them. So that it is for the publick Profit, that the wicked and vicious Ihould be well known and defcribed. This many will fay with Warmth, and a fteming Zeal, as if it were Love for the Publick which made 'em bring this Ob- jcQion and what it includes. But for An- fwer, I demand who has given any Man a particular Right and Authority thus pub- iickly to dctamc any one's Reputation. All the World own, that it belongs only to DETRACTION. n^ to Magiftrates thu? to tarnifh a Man*s Re- Sect. putation on Account of his Crimes, and ^'^^^* this by Sentences, Arrefts andPunifhments.^'^'^'^^"^ ^Tis to publick Pcrfons whom the Provi- dence of GOD has raifed in Dignity, that thefe Judgments and thefe laft defamatory Sentences belong. As they have in their oivn hands the Authority neceflary for this, they have alfo ordinarily the Knowledge, the Prudence and the Means neccfTary to make and to execute their Arreft ^ things whereof the greateft Part, and commonly all thefe Qualities, are wanting in othets. What Service then can a Man pretend to do the Publick, when he adb againft pub- lick Perfons, by ufurping theii Authority ? Secondly^ If what we publifh is of fo great Concern to Society, Why don't we tell it to the Magiftrate, and let them pu- niJDh the Wicked for their evil Anions ? Thirdly^ Let us examine, Whether it be I^ove for the Publick which makes us Ipeak fo openly of a Man's Crimes. Cer- tainly if we confider what we arc doing, we fhall often find that it arilcs only irom a Spirit of private Revenge. If we have injured a Perfon, or if we have not, but he imagines we have ; Ihallwcofthis private Affair go and make a publick one ^ Or bc- caufe we fancy that we have been ott'cndcd, mud we pretend that all thcPublickfiiouKi take Part in this Offence ? 'Tis thus wc n ^ wouM a3o ji freatife againjl Sect, wou'd have our fclves talked of andbecoine ^^^^- confiderablc. What is there more unjuft ^ ' or more extravagant than this ? Are we fuch pubHck Perfons, that the PubHck mult have fuch a Ihare therein ? This is the common Pretence of Princes, and many times of private Perfons, to get the PubHck intereiled in their own par- ticular Quarrels. If we look further, We Ihall find that we make ufe of the fpecious Pretence of Love for the Publick, as a Covering for Jealoufy, Sell-Love and Covetoufnefs. If on a thoufand other Occafions, we do no- thing at all for this Publick we make fuch a noife about • if we remain unprofitable to our Country, how can we think that it is the publick Good we wiih and {tQii af- ter on this Occafion ? On a thoufand Oc- cafions we might do the Publick ^Society, much more ggod by concealing the Perfons, than by difcovering them by their Faults, What Evil truly can a Pcrfon do, whom we are ignorant of(iC with whom confcquent- ly we have noCommcrce ? Whereas Exam- ple and tlic Contagion of a Crime are al- ways dangerous Things. Let us then en- tirely banilli the Memory thereof. This is the Way to puniih Criminals and to do fcrvice to the Publick, to bury in Forget- fiilncfs the Sins with the Sinners. In DEfRACflON. :i3i In fine, Let us imitate the Example of our blefled Saviour who fcnt away the adulterous Woman without jadging her, when he had learnt that noneof her Judges had condemned her. Thus when Sinners have received no Blot in their Reputation from the Magiftratc or the Church, we mull fay, Since no Man has condemned them^ neither do I condemn them. It mull be remembrcd, that what I here fay mull be in Subordination to the Cafes taken notice of before, in which it is fome- times lawful todifcover theFaults of others, and what I have here faid does not con- tradift that, becaufe in the preceeding Seftion I fuppofe that they were publick Errors which were publickly to be refu- ted^ whereas here the Cafe is differentv XL Is It not lawful, lay fome, to talk of Crimes that are pubii(hedabroad,and which the greateft Part of the World know i^ When aPerfon has already loft his Honour, what hurt will it be to him to tell how he loft it ? I demand, firft, what they mean by thcle Faults, which are known abroad. If they mean thofe which are difcoverM and piin- ifhed by the Magiftracy,doubtlcfs it is law- ful to fpeak of them. They have a Ri2,ht to expofe them to the View of all the World, and truly they io it, that fo by the Q^j Fxample i 3 i -^ freatiji againji Sect. Example ofChaftifement, others may be- VIII. \^iiz how they violate the Laws. They ^-^"""^^^ punifh Criminals publickly, that we may know and fpeakof them, thereby thePeace of a Society is prefervcd • In fine, none of thefe Things which hinder Detiaflion in other Circun:fl:arces, dcpfimi^ it in this. But if by pLibiick binSj ' rhcy mean thofc which are known only to many Perfons in a City, ?nd abont which the Magiftratc has judged nothing, I f::y \Ve Ought not to fpeak of them, and that then >ve ought to remember the general Precept againft De- tradion. If a Man lias loft his Honour, was it not by I>eti action, and why then fhould we follow a way which ha* already been fo hqrtfal to him ? And perhaps he has not loft it to fucli a Degree, as that where- to we do expoic him. If a Man fay;?, that it is needlefs to hide a Fault which many Perfons know already : I anfwcr by this 'Dilemma ^ cither they to whom you fpeak of it, do already know it, or they do not. If they do know it, then 'tis needlefs for you to tell what they know already. Ifthey do not know ir, then you injure the inter- efted Pcrfon, by making known his Faults to Perfons who had not been informed thereof. ' XU But, fay fo-iic,' Charity is not blind. What do they menn by this? if they mean DETRACTION. :>:> piean that Charity won't hinder a Man from Sect. feeing the Faults of others, I agree to it, ^^*''- but if they mean that Charity may publiih ^'^^^^ Faults, which it fees ; I deny it, otherwilb what we call Charity wou'd be no more Charity. On the Occafion we mention, Charity changes as I may fay, its Office, cr rather this fame VirtQe makes ufe of quite different Forms from what it has on other Occafions, Commonly one of its Properties is to enlighten and inftrud the'Ignorant ; here on the contrary it hides the Vices of another from thofe who are ignorant of *cm. In a word, if it is not blind,I fay in ourSub- jeft it is mute J It is not deaf, not to hear what is faid, but it isdumbnottodivulge it. XI I L Son^e fay, 'Tis impoiTibIc to help ot- tering a fine, witty Expreffion, a fiiarp Repartee againft a Perfon when it comes into our Mind. ' I reply, That in reality all this pretend- ed impoffibility is ' purely imaginary, and confequently unable to juitify us be- fore GOD, or any ways help thc^Caufc of Detraftion. There is noMan, but wou'd abftain therefrom, were he fire that his Tongue fhould be bored every Time he Dctraded. Any one thro' fear of this Pu- nifhment wouM refrain immediately: Why then don't we refrain thro' fear of far great- er and more durable Pains in the other World, 234 -^ freatife againii Sect. World, if we can't be perfuaded thereto VIII. thro' Love to GOD and thro' noble Prin- ^•^'^"'^^^'^ ciples ? If it be impoflible to refrain De- tradion, it willbe far more impoffible to endure eternal pains : What wou'd you do if you were obliged to fufFer ten Thoufand Torments, and end your Life in Martyr- dom, for GOD's Glory ? Neverthelefs you ought to be always ready to be facrificed for him when his Law and his Glory require it, and you ought rather to fuffer Death, than to break the leaft of his Commands ; and to Cn againft the Light of your own Confcience : This is certain from Scripture and by the Pradice of many Millions of Chriftians. How then could you do this, if you have not Power enough over your felf to keep your Tongue ? Wou'd that be backward to denyJefusChrift, after having been fo adive and ready to infult his Mem- bers ? But if it feem impoffible to refrain De- tracting at our neighbour's Coft, there ap- pears in fome Pcrfons a ftill greater impol- fibility, not to dctiad from thofe who had before Ipokcn ill of them. I don't here fpeak of thofc moderate Juftifications which are lawful, but of thofe Recriminations, which properly do not jultify, but only ihevv that he who firil Detracted has at Icalt as many Defcds as thofe of whom he fpakc ill, which fcrve only to charge others with more DETRACTION. 27,^ more Faults, without clearing our fclvcs S^ct. of thofc which hare been caft on our Con- ^*^^- duft. Whatj fay fome, won't it be lawful for me to detract from thofe who fiilt of all, and without my giving them any Sub- jeft therefor, have blafted Riy Reputation ! Thus paffionate, hafty, revengeful Pcrfons talk. Bat true Chriftians will reply, that we ought not to detrad from a Dctradlor, for thereby we Ihall become guilty of what we blame in others. Private Revenge is R'^n^.u.i^ as much forbidden, as pardon of Offences is required by GOD, who protefts that he will not Pardon our Offences unlels we for- give others the Wrongs they have done us, which Judgment we fubfcribe to as often as we repeat the Prayer which the Saviour of the World taught his Difciples, and which he has commanded us to repeat. Say not then, Such a Man has offended me not only once but manyTimes&: many ways ; For the written Word of GOD theGofpel, yea the eternal Word, the Son of G O D, Matth. ii. requires us to pardon not only feven Times =-• but Seventy Times fevcH, and when this Number fhall be accompliflied, if you return and confult this Word it will tell you again, Pardon him flijl fcvcnty Times ieven who is yourEnemy • and again mul- tiply this Number by fomany fevens. Can any one be ignorant that our Lord by his Example and by his Precepts, commands j.jVc ^.z, us 2^6 A frcatije again (i Sect, us to blcfs them that curfe us, far from iJlli^ being revenged on them ? An unhappy ^^^ Battle that, in which wc repel Detraftions byDetraaions ! Tis with this as withDuels, whetlKr the Engagers conquer or be con- quered, 'tis ftill fatal to them. If we fall under, the remainder of our own Honour and Credit is loft ; and if we have the up- per hand, that of our Neighbour is ruin'd. Thefe two Extremities are fatal and there is no Medium. Still further, Suppofe we Ihould obtain our End, even to ruin our Neighbour's Credit, yet we fliall deftroy our own with his. Not to mention here the infernal Damnation, which Revenge and Detraction fhall one Day receive as the Reward of their Viftory, nothing expoies more to the Contempt of Men than this Sort of Revenge, which is really altogether ridiculous. Is not this a fine way indeed to juftify our felves, to go and barely (hew the WeaknefTes of our Acc^fers, without producing any Thing for our owp Inno- cence ! To retort an Argumei;t is not tlic way to Anfwer it. Is there any Thing more proper to deprive you of thcTirle of a wife and judicious Man, than to do what you condemn in others ? Docs not this Ihew a want of goodfenlc ? And yet tb.is is what thefe revengeful Pcrfons do. They complain that others fpakc evil ofthcni, and they condemn this Vice in others^, ana yet DETRy^GriON. 2S7 yet they make no Difficulty to commit it. Sect. To aft thus is to endeavour to overthrow V^^^- aReputation which they had only ihakcn : '^^'^^^^ 'Tis to enlarge the Breach inllcad of re- pairing it j as has been eilcwhcrclhewn. XIK Some fay, That there are Perfons whofc Malice is lb great and lb frequently ulcd, that they don't deierve to be Iparcd, or to have any regard fhewn to theirReputation, nnd that they may thank themlelves if they do lofe their Honour, for it is but thcCon- fequence of their Tricks, their Wickednefs and their Vices. I anfwer, We are not always to deal with Men according to their Deferts, but according tQ Charity. We are not to lay hold on every Occafion, unlefs we can do a Favour to our Neighbour. The greater his Faults are, and the more frequent his Falls, the more ought we to conceal them, that lb we may, as we are obliged, raife this excellent Virtue to its higheft Pitch. As the Law was not made for the Righteous, iTiiv.^i. 9 fo Charity is notcxcrciled towards thcRich and the Holy, but towards the Poor and the grcateft Sinners. The more deftitute a Peribn is of the NecefTaries of this Life, the more need has he of our help and the more are wc obliged to fuccour him. Even fo, the more Perfons fail in thole Things cieccffary f9r the Maintenance of fpiritual Life, Matt 5-45- ^238 A Trcatifc again fl Life, the more charitable ought we to Ic towards them. For this End let us confi- der, thatGOD bears with us notwithftand- ing our great infirmities • he does not fail to caufe his Sun to rife, and his Rain to fall on theWicked. Let us imitate his Aftions and caufe Grace to abound where Sin has Rom. 5.26' 1 J J abounded. 'Tis true, the Sins and Wickcdnefs of Men arc the occafional Caufes and theMat- ter of Detradlion, but in reality we muft rather fearch for the Source thereof in Pride, and in the Malignity of Detractors, than in thcDefcds of theDetrafted. What, becaule 1 have finn'd, do I thereby necel- farily engage others to publifh thefeDefeds ! No, by no means. If I do \o{t myCredit, it is much rather by means of thole who publifli my Faults, than thro' my own JDefcfts, which wou'd do me no Prejudice, if they did not: Ipiead them abroad. Thefc Faults wou'd never do any hurt to my Honour, if others did not take Care to publifh them and make them known. In fine, lome objedl, that they may de- trad in many Cafes where the holy Scrip- ture permits it. I own it, and have fliewn what thcfc Cafes are in the foregoing Sec- tion, to which I refer the Reader, T'he Ufes of this SeBion. « Sect. VIII. T T IS cafy to fliew in a Word the Weak- ^-OT^ •* nefs of the Obje£lions made to authorile Detradion, by Ipeaking from what Prin- ciple they come. Thefc Principles are Ignorance and Corruption. 'Tis only the Ignorant, the half-L earned, and vicious World that will alledge them. WereMen better inftrufted in theScripture they wou'd cafily of themlelves know, that theExam- ples and Paffages they cite to uphold the Sin we are arguing againft,do 6C fay nothing at all that may favour it, at leaft when 'tis taken in general. Secondly^ Corruption and Inclination to the World and t© Sin, make Men bring thefe Paffages againft us. They love all the Sources of Dctradion. They feek it becaufe it helps to falisfy their Self-Love and other Vices. Hence it is, that they feek in their Minds all the Reafons which may ferve them,to deceive themfelves, and to make them believe that there is none or but very little Evil in doing what plcafes them. So ingenious a Love as this, will foon caufe a Man to find the fpecious Rea- fons he is after. But as this Love is blind, it makes us take that for Solid which is not fo at all. As we endeavour only to deceive our felves by Flattery, what we find is but an lUufion aad an Error. So that :! 4C A Trcdt'ifc (igalnjl Sect, that altho' we can't help acknowledging VIII. that what we love is criminal, yet we en- deavour at leaft to exciife our felves be« caufe of Univerfality, Ufe and Cuftom^ ct becaulc that othcrwife we Ihould pafs for lidiculouSj bigotted iL hypccriticalPerfons^ as has been ihewn in this Sedion. Thus whether we naturally love to de- tract, or too much love to pleafe others, we lay a Thouiand vain Things, we make a thoufand EvaCons, to excule our felves afterwards before that Witnels and Judge we carry in cur Confcienccs, and which is,- properly i peaking, oar Conlcience it felf. This fhcvrs that our Corruption, cu.t Love to the World, and our Self-Love,are Jnuch oftcDcr the Caufcs of the Objefticn*! "^ve bring in Favour of Detraction, than want of Light and Knowledge neceflary to •anfwer them. WefhouLl certainly lee the Wickcdncfs of it, ifwedidnot endeavour to hide it from our felves. However it be, I have done my utmoft to inftrud you in what you might be ignorant of, and on the other Hand, Iliave fhewn how criminal is this too great Com- plaifance wc have for Men and that extra* ordinary Fondnefs wc have for Eftccm,and thereby I have anfwercd Objections and endeavoured to root out the Caufcof'em, and all for your Profit. As the Excufe drawn frcm the numberlefs Multitude of iixampleg- DEfRACriON. 5i4t Examples of DetraSors, is the moft com- Sect. mon, we fhall finifti by praying you to ^^^^• confider, That the generality hereof fhouU ^^'^^^"^ be fo far from being a Motive to follow the Multitude, that on the contrary it ought to be a Motive not to do thus, fince this Univerfality furnifhes us with fo many the more Examples, that what follows Detrac- tion is Sin and Vice ^ which is alio further confirmed by the Word of GOD. In fine, When thro' an evil Fear ofpaf- fing in the World for Hypocrites and Per- fons of an ill-contrived Spirit, we arc upon the Point of Detracting and Sinning a- gainft theGofpel of JESUS CHRIST. Let us then think of thofe terrible Words of the Gofpel, fVhofoeijer therefore fjjall he ajhamed ofme^ and of my fVords^ in this adulterous and Jinful Generation^ ^y^MarkS.^r. him alfopall the Son of Man be afhamed 'when he cometh in the Glory of his Fa* ther, with the holy Angels. R SE crio N ^^^j^^^^^^^^^^^--^^^^-'^^'^^^^^^ A Treatife again/i SECTION IX. Motives to avoid this Sin. ^TfWW"^^ N the foregoing Sedion wc c^-|$.^5o^^| have forced Dcrradors from ^lio I ri% their very laftlntrenchments, I^QOog,^! by ftiewing the Weaknefs cf hsk^^^n^v^v thofeReafons which they com- monly make ufe of as a Co- vert, and a Bulwark againft thofe Texts of Scripture which prefs them , and the Reproofs which are made them of their Fault ; and even the Remorfcs of their Conlciences. Neverthelefs we doubt ftill that we have not prevailed on Men to for- fake this Vice • not that we doubt of the Validity of our Arguments and Anfwcrs, but becaufe we are convinced of the ordi- nary Refinances of Men againft the clcareft and ftrongeft Things, when once Inclina- tion, Habit, Pallion have taken PcfTciTion of the Heart. To fortify what has been already faid, it will therefore be neceflary to propofe new Motives to engage Men to amendment. l^ MOTIFE, Moft of tliolc Things which engage Men in Detraction, and arc the Sources thereof, fhould keep them from it. Vanity and vain Glory arc often the Caufesot De- trition, yet thclc ought to make us fliun it, fince hereby we fatirize the evil Repu- Srct.IX tation of furious and indifcrcet Pcrfonsj v^^T^ which may fufficiently mortify Self-Love and Vanity. Sometimes Intereft makes a Man detraft, and yet this Intereft ftiould keep him from it, fince Detraftion draws on us the Hatred and Perfecution of thofe we fpafce ill of ; which is very oppofite to our own Intereft. All that has been faid to prove Detrac- tion a Sin, and all the Effeds juftly attii* luted thereto, are fo many powerful Rea. fons to keep us from it. A Dread of dif- obeying GOD who will chaftife Detraftion is a moft urgent Motive againft it. All the otherEffefts of this Sin, and a thoufand Confiderations already mentioned, mull neceSarily and of choice Eftrange us from it. ^d MOflFE. Another great Confideration and which ^^^^^^^ Ihould oblige Men to quit this Sin is,That there is no Man but what fins and fails in his Duty. This is a Truth fo certain,that a Fart of Prayer and the Worfliip we ren- der to GOD, confifts in confefling ourSins, 'Tis a great mark that no Man is perfcft; that all the World find imperfeftions in 0- thers. They who detraft fee Faults in thofe they fpeak ill of, and thofe in their turn find Faults in their Accufcrs. Wc can't fay that cither of 'em arc miftaken R 5. and i 44 -^ Treat ife againji Sect.IX. and judge wrong. For the' wc are blind ^'^'"^^^^^^ in our own Conducl, yet., wc can fee clei.i enough in our IScighbour's. When all Men agree in the fanie Principles, there the Truth muft needs be, for no Error is fc general and univerfal as to Ipread over aL the World. And fince the whole Univcrlc agree in finding Evil one in another, they muft certainly be all vicious. I confef> that every one thinks himfelf better and more perfcft than he really is, we don't well know our own Defeds or at leaft we don't enough think of em. Witncls Ds^ iSam.12,7 "^td^ who wcUjudgcd that theMan, ^atlnn fpake of, who had taken away the poor Man's Lamb, was a Robber ^ and he did not at that Moment refleft that he himfelf had done a much greater Injuftice to Uriah. We refemble thofe who are hunch-backt, %vho don't fee the Load they carry about with 'cm, continually even to the Grave, which they who walk behind 'em can ea- fily fee. All the Ways of a Man arc right ro.i2.if. j^^ his own Eyes, fays the wife Men on this Occafion. Bur, bcfidcs that others do not judge after this Manner, Is it not eafy ibi thofe who think their Ways "io pure, to difcoverby Examination, that they arc no- thing ncarfuch as they imagined thcmfelves to be ? Let every Uotch in a Man'^ Life be produced and felt of, and he will fooa perceive that he is neither upright nor pcrfed. DEfRAGTIOK. ^45 perfeft. And altho' a Man had but this Sfct.IX Fault of being a Detraaor, at Icaft this ii ^^^"nt^ one. And alcho' he Ihould not think himfelf lucb, yet don't we all know that we have fecret Faalts, which we are to ask Forgiven^fs of from GOD, and to fay with Davld^Lord^ Ckanfctbou me f torn fecret PfaL i^, Faults. Siix:e then every one is undoubtedly a Sinner, and fince all Men have their Fail- ings, with what Reafon or Juftice can we deride thofe of others ? Can we do it, with- out condemning our felves by accufingour ielves in thePeiTon of others ? 'Tis never- thelefs as common as it is ridiculous, to fee thofe who would pafs for fine Raillers, be- gin to rail at themfelves and afterwards at- tack others. Can we fee thro' it, that Pcr- fons who have been difcovering their own Failings, Ihould not blufh to go to expofc thofe of others ? How can a vicious Man deride Vice ? Such Men feem to Sin not only againft Scripture, but againft Reafon, not only by their Raillery, bat by their manner of Iprcading it abroad. In general, As all DetradDrsare Sinner.'?, and perhaps culpable of t-hofe very Faalts they blame in others, arc they not afraid that we ihall apply to them, what the A- poftlc faid of the Heathen, IVbcrcfore^O Mcin^ "whoever thou art^ that judge ji n- ^ not her J thou art inexcufahle • fn ijcherc" '" " R 3 in 2j^6 A frcatifc agaiujl ^^cr.lX in thou judgejt another^ thou condemneji ^-^^^"^^^ thy felf^ for thou thy felfdojl the fame things ? If they are not fubjcft to the fame Vices, they are to others. So Jefus Chrift may fay to them, Let him among you -who is John t. 7. without Sin^ cajt the firft Stone ; ^nd in Confufion they will be obliged to go uvay without faying any Thing, thereby tacitly owning their own Sins, and the Sting they feel for having accufed their Neighbour. May we not fay to them, as the converted Thief to his Companion, Feared not thou Lukji..4o Q^j^ feeing we are in the fame Condemn nation ? LTnder the Law, GOD ftrongly recommended to the Ifraelites^ Pity for Strangeis and the Afflifted, becaufe they Sxod-ij,?. themfelvcs had been Strangers in yEgypt^ and there fuffer'd many Evils; fo becaufe we are all fubjcft to the fame moral Evil, namely Sin, we Ihould be charitable one towards another, Suppofe the Detraftor fhould have fcw- * cr Faults than theDetraftcd, Does that give liim any Plea todetradl ? On the contrary, tfo whom is he indebted that he is not lb great a Sinner ? 'Tis to the Grace of GOD. Is this then any Rcafon for bis Pride ? No indeed: On the contrary, 'tis a Rcafon for him to blcfs the Lord for his Gifts, and to endeavour to make ufe of his Goodnefs for good Words, and holyAftions. Tis more- over over a Motive not to detract, bccaufe the Sec:.! more we have received, the more will be Y"^ required of us, and the more ready ought we to be to that which is good ; that fo we may bring forth the Fruits which GOD juftly expeds from his Grace in us. In line, the more ought we to confider, that we Hand only by Grace, and that if the Bc- ftower thereof ftiould take it away, we fhould in a moment fall into the grealeit Excefles. Thus all thefe Confiderations fhould oblige us continually, when we hear thefe Sinsfpoken )f in others, to which we are not fubjcft, to thank God on the one Hand that we arenotgiven up to them, and on the other, to beextreamly watchful, left we fall into Detraftion. Tisaftrange- Extravagancy of Men, that having fomany Subjefts here below to be humble, they iliould not be fo, altho' they know that theSaintswho are withGod & havefo many Subjects for glorying ir. their Advantages, do not glory in them. ^'''^ " When I make ufe, either of the Sins to which Detradors are fubjed, with the reft of the World, or of the Greatnefs of the Sin it felf, which they commit by detrafi ing, to fhewtheSin they commit, in evil fpcak- ing,I do not thereby extenuate the re al Faults of thofe who are Detracted. Here we may fay without Detraction, fmce we do not inteieft aiy one in particular herein, what R 4 NVC 548 -^ freatife agatnfi Sect.IX we fay often fpeaking ill of two Pcrfons ^-""^V"^^ at the fame time, they are both in the wrong, thefc by finning, thofe by divulging the Sin. Suppofing he who is the Objed of Detraction and he who fpreads it abroad, are otherways equally Sinners, yet ftill it is certain that this laft is more criminal than the other, becaufe even in this Detraftion he has finned more thar the other. Is it not then a great Piece of infolence, and a terrible Raflincfs to backbite Perfons who are really better than ones felf ? Is it not an Aggravation, when in all Regards they ^\io are detrafted are letter than the De- traftor ? 3. MOTIVE. Another powerful Motive to fhun De- traction is, That all Men are Brethren, and confequently arc obliged to love each other in this relation. This Confequence is fo juft, natural and true, That I don't think any one will queftioji it. The Principle from v\ hence it is taken, is not lefs certain^ That one and the fame, and the liril Man was the Father of all others. We are then all Branches from the fame Stock, Streams from the fame Fountain. Hence that fay- ing of St. Paul ; GOD bath formed all K'\i\j ^^^^^ f^f one Jilood, Hence the Prophet i»"..js. 3. i^f^icis exhorted the Jci:}:sx.o Chaiity, be- caufe they who had need of ChvUity were of DETRACTION. 24^ of the fame Flefh with thofc whofc Duty Sf.ct.IX it was to he charitable. Let me add, that ^-^^V"^ all were formed after the Image of GOD, and are thereby Copies of the fame origi- nal. Befides, Grace makes Men partakers of the fame Benefits, and like Brethren who fliare among thcmfclves the Goods w^hich their Father leaves them. The fame Blood has made them all, and the fame Blood has redeemed them all. But now if we ought to love all Men as our Brethren, how can we treat them as Enemies by dif* honouring them ? 4fh MO fiFE. The Precept againft Detraftion is very eafily pradifed. I don't treat hereof that A£l of Charity which Jefus Chrift prefcri- bed to the young Man, who enquired of him, what^ he mujl do to inherit cterfial Mat.i^.n; Life^ and whom he ordered to fell his 'whole Ejiate and dtjlribute it among the Poor. Neither do I here treat of laying down our temporal Lite to procure eter- nal Life for our Brethren, according to the Example of our blelTcd Saviour, and the Command of St. John. All the Qucftion i Epift. y, is, to hold our Tongue; which we may ^^^*^^"* eafily do, and which will bring us no harm. You have perhaps often laid to your felt, ^' Had I been in Adam's Place, I would not have tranfgrcflcd theCommandmcnt of GOD as he did, fince Obedience to it was ajo -^ T'reatife againfi SicT.IXib eafy. I pray, What will Obedience Vi'Or^ coft you more now ? Is it harder to refrain fp«aking, than eating aFrait ? Moreover, "Tis a Law which Ihould appear entirely agreable to us : For if it ihelters others from our Flings and Detraftions, will it notalfofhelter us from thofe oi others? Has not GOD forbid others to detraft, as well as us ? And doubtlefs fome are thereby kept from faying to our Damage all that they might. Sth MOfJFE. Nothing will prefervc our Reputation more than an abftinence from this Vice. As is thus proved : Without repeating what was faid in the 6th Seftion, I fay, that by our not Detradling from others, we give them no Occaiion to re- venge thcmfelvcs on us by othcrDetradions on their Part, and to meafure to us as wc prov J: f^jayg meted to them. He that diggeth a Ditch.jhall fall thereintOy and he thai rolleth Stone^ it will return upon him, fays Solomon. But if a Man do not dig a Ditch to caufe his Neighbour to fall there- in, and wound him, nor roll the Store ofDetraftion againft him,hcisin noDangci of being wounded himfclf by falling into theDitchhc had not dug for hisNeighbour, or by the Fall of the Stone he had rolled againft him, i. There DEfRy^CTION. 251 -1. There is no Perfon's Faults lb much Sect. 1)4 remarked as thofe who take a Pleafure in '^^^'V^' finding them in others ; whereas we don't ib much examine the Life of thofe who do not thus fcan theConduft of other People j for it is very common to enter into an Examination of the Life of thefe Sorts of Perfons, who fpeak of the Lives of others with as much Boldnefs and Confidence, as if they themfelves had obtained to perfedt Holinefs. 3. I have ever heard thofe commended who arc not fubjeft to Detraction, and truly they always have been efteemed, and ever will be, while there remains any Re- ipcft and Love for Virtue. 4. When we have once began to detract from every Body, we lofe our Credit and all manner of Confidence among others. If at anyTime we praife others, Men think we jeer and droll, and don't fpeak ferioufly, and that the good we fay of 'em is only Satyr. Thus Men don't believe us. Thus it is \yith Liars : Men don't believe 'cm tho- they they talk ever fo true. Moreover our Reputation ought to be precious to us, not only for reafons already mentioned, and not only becaufe it is pro- fitable to us, but alfo becaufe it may be fo with regard to our Neighbour. It caufes our Advice for the good of particular Per- Tons or ofthePublick to be better received 2ja A freatijc agalnd SscT.IXand our Exhortations to others to lead a ^^''""^^'^^ goodLifCjto be the better followed. Thi^ our Concern tor GOD'd Glury and our Neighbour's Salvation, as well as our own Profit, ought to urge us to preferve our Honour, by refraining from Detraclion. 6th M O r I F E. Nothing will more efFcftually gain us not only the Efteem, but alfo the Good- Will of all the World, than to refrain from Detradion. As this raifes us up Enemies, fo refraining from Detraftion procures us Friends. We naturally love thofe who will bear with our Failings & not difcover them. This therefore procures us the Friendfhip of others, which muft needs be advantageous to us. 'Tis true, there are Perfons wi:h whom Vic ought not to be too ftraitly linkcd,but there are none whom we ought to make our Enemies without ncceffity, and by our cvilCairiage. Nothing hinders but that we may accept even the Services of a wicked Man, provided that he do no Man hurt, to do us a pleafurc. And fince there are none but what may help or hurt us, let us endeavour to give them only grounds to love us. Here it muft be added, that oftcntir.ics Detradtion does not bring any Profit ar.d never any true Pleafurc. They of whom wc ipealvill,may perhaps have found fomc Plcafure DETRACriON. ^Si Pleafure or Profit in the Evil they have Sect. IX done, but on a thouland Occafions, what w^*v^ good arifes from being a Detrador! If wc take any Pleafure therein, it is troubled by a Fear that he whom we Ipeak ill of, will hear of it and be revenged on us. As to the Profit of Detraction, wt com- monly lofe more by it than we gain. Or if we do gain any Thing by it, we violate that Precept of the Apoftlc, whkh forbids ^ a Man to make his own Profit by theLois of another. And thi: Precept is a new Motive to refrain from Detraftion. yth M O r I F E. When once we have began to ccnfure every one, as Detraftors ordinarily do, if it happen (as is common) that webecoiiie faulty in any Thing,the World won't par- don us in the leaft Matter. This Motive isy I own, purely humane, but perhaps on this Account it will be more proper to make an Imprcflion on many Perfons ; we become the Talk and Ridicule of all the World, and even of thofe who have not muchPropenfitytodetrad. All the World rejoice when they can cenfurc thole who have cenfured all the World. In a Word, No one will fhew us any Favour What, fay they. It becomes this Man indeed to fpe.k ill of every Body, he that has the Very greateft of Faults himfelf! Oftrangc, That ever the Man who detrads from all the aj4 -^ Trea^ife againji Sect.IX the World, fliould be guilty of fuch Blun*' ^^^^^^^^^ ders! 8//? MOTIVE. The Dignity of our Tongue is a Motive which fhouid hinder us from defiling it by pfai.57. 8 Detraction. Da'vid calls it his Glory. If it be our Glory, why fhouid we dilhonour it by making ufe of it to the dilhonour of our Neighbour ? Let usconfiderj That the eternal Word was made Flelh, to teach and redeem Men. And ftiould not this Benefit be a great Mo- tive to Men not to profane thtrir Speech, by detracting from thofe for whom he took Flefh on himfelf, and not to employ it in difobeying the Commands which he came to give us againft Detraction ? AH the World owns. That cur Nature has received a great Increafe ofGlory fincc the Son of GOD is united to it. And fincc the eternal Word has fpake as other Men, their Speech has received a confiderable Augmentation of Glory and Dignity, a Dignity which fliould engage them not to defile a thing which GOD has made ufe of. It was doubtlefs becaufe we were formed xPcti.i<; after the Image of GOD, that St. Peter commands us to be holyy as he is holy • and it was bccaufc GOD the Son was for- med in our rciemblancc, and is united to our Nature, that St. Pat/l commands us It. * * '' to be imitators of JefusChrilt, Chrill be* ing DEfRAC'/ION. iji ing made like to us, it is needful that weSicr.lX become like to him. In a word, fince he^. without Ceaftng. Wou'd we employ that Time which we Ipend in prying into and finding out the Defects of others, in cor- recting our own and examining our felves, we ihould acknowledge, that this Duty requires fo much Time that there would be none left lor cenfuring the Actions of other Men. Some complain, that they have no lei- fure to read GOD's Word in private, end to difcharge the otherDutics of Piety ^ but this Complaint woa'd ceafe if we did cm- ploy for thisEnd,theTime which we ipend in Words and Vifits ot Detradion. When we are thus diftraded and involved in the Affairs of others, we have no Tim- for to think of our own. Above all, iirftead of difcourfing to the Diladvanta^e of our Neighbours, we might difcourfc fo as to be advantageous to our felves, even by blcfling and praifing GOD with our Mouth. And truly, to keep us iVom dctraftmg, there is no need of cutting cut our Tongue, aslbmc Ghriftians have donc.for fear left thcStrcngth of ayo A T'reatife againjl Sect. X. of the Temptations they endured for the >-'''V^ Nameof Jeliis Chrift, fhould oblige them to deny him with their Mouth. Here the Temptation is not fo ftrong, and moreover inalmuch as we may make our Tongue Icrve to glorify GOD, we Ihould do our Iclves a great Injury to deprive our felves of thisHelpo And further we may remark, that oui' Lord well fays, that if our Eye, Mitth. y, our right Hand, our Foot offends us, it is -^. 50. our Duty to pluck it out, to cut it off • but he lays Ho liich thing of the Tongue, becaufe that perhaps the other Members do not contribute lb much to the Glory of our Father andCreator, as we may blels him with this. Moreover, If w^e apply our felves to the Things of the Kingdom of Heaven as we ought, we Ihall have no Will for Detrac- tion, becaufe that in this Study we Ihall find athoufand Inftruftions and Motives which may turn us therefrom. As tie Itch of Talking is not only one of the Sources of Detradticn, but inalmuch as Detraftbn it lelf is many Times only a Babling, tht Means of abflaining therefrom Rom. U' ^vill be to taik little. The Apoftlc alio commands us to be flow to fpeak. Job Jcb3x. i.rnade a Covenant with his Eyes, that he might not Sin by their means,lb we fhould make a Covenant with our Tongue, thar we offend not GOD by that, 'Twas lor this D E r R ACTIO N. ^^i this that the Pfalmift laid, He would keep Sect.X, his Mouth with a Bridle. This Care is lo -^"^K^ necelTary even for our temporal Benefit ^^'^' ''^*^* that the Heathen owned this Advantage offilence. Cato \ faid, th.t the Prime and principalVirtue was to rule theTouguc, And that he is next to GOD, uoho kfwws how to be rationally JilenL Another * excellently faid, that he who knows not how to he ftlent^knows not how to [peak. Indeed we muft have ibmeReafons to talk, but there is no need of any for our filence. The Time we allow for filence, or if you pleafe, the Time which filence allows us, may be very profitable to us by re- flecting on the weighty Reafons we have to refraifi Dctradlion. Thus I wcu'd ad- vile thofe who are tempted to detract,only to think on that Precept of the Apoftle l^aul^ Speak Evil tff no Man. As we know very well, that this Command was given by Infpiration of a GOD who will feverely punifh them who break hisLaws; This tho't alone may make us hate and ab- hor Detradlion And altho' we ought to Ipeak with re- ferve, yet we may fpcak with an open and free Air, which carries with it neither Au- fterity nor Pedantry. i \ t Virtutcm primam efTe puta compcfccrc Lin- guam ; Cato. f k'roximus ille DcOj qui fcit latione taccrc. ^'jz A Threat ife againd Sect. X. My farther advife is, That we make it yry^^ ^ DQtv to weep over Sinners, to be H,rievcd ior the Faults they commit, and not to make them the Subjeft ot our Paitime and Diverfion, as is but too common. If \vc coniider the Zeal we ought to have for GOD's Glory, and the Love we owe our !Ncighbours,there is nothing more capable of raifing our CompaHion towards them, and of moving our Bowels with Grief, than to lee how they are plunging themlelvcs into eternal Mileries by their finful ways. 'Twas on this Account that the Royal Prophet laid in PjaL 1 1 1^. 53; That Floods ofTcars ran doiso?i his Eye s^ 'when he Jaw that Men kept not God's Law, Hence it was that Lot's righteous Soul was afflicted, when he confidercd the Crimes of &*/ have If many Occafions and Temptations to do it. Thus we ought to engage in what David faid, / ^ill look well to my fVaySy that I of end not wth my foogue. ^ *^* ^**' ARTICLE //. 7'Jbe Duties of thofe iJbbo are fallen "■'■ '- '' into DctraHion. IN the foregoing Article we confidered Detraction, as a Sin which we might fall into, in this we Ihall confider it as al- ready committed. In the one I have (hewn what ihaft be our Praclice in order to a- void It ^' here I Ihall Ihew what muft be done to' corre<^ it, to remedy it as much as poffible and render it al light as may be. Not but that all which we have faid ii the othet Article may fait this: For the fame Advices we have already given, arc very neceflary for thofe who have aftaally dc- traded. Bat as to thefe laft, fomcthin? farther is really neceflary. Their firft Duty is to repent of their Detraftions and to forfake them. All the World own this Condition to be abfolate- ly ncccffary in order to obtaia the Pardon otj6 A Treatifc againjt Sect.X. of their Sins from GOD. -™ Dctraftion ^-Or''^ being a Sin, Repentance is then abiblutcly ncccflary therefor. ^ , , . , , ^ And fince Sorrow is a Part of Repen- tance, they who have fpake ill of others, muflr neceffarily be now afflided, therefor. Jim, 4. f, O Dctradtors, Be aJfiBedy and ntourn^and ' 'poeep : Let your Laughter be turned to ' Mournings and your Joy to Heaiiinefs, And when vye have quitted this Sin, wc ought afterwards to ad quite contrary,and to repair the Injury wc have done our Neighbour by defaming him. I know this Injury is in a fcnfc, irreparable, fincc wc Cannot make what h^s been laid, be unfaid, s^nd^vhat ha$ been, written, be unwritten. Neverthdefs if wheja wc have blamed a Pcrfon oa Account qf Ibme particularFafts, we ihew, that on the other Hand he has Virtues which delerve our Vraifes, this a little diminiiheth the ill Idea wc had for- merly given of him. ^ If there be any Thing oppofite to De- traftion, it is doubtlefs the I'raife we give to the good Aaions of our Neighbours, and thie mentioning of thcfe Adions. Per- haps wc fhan't liiccccd fo as to make the Pcrfons before whom \yjc formerly detraded, bclicye the Good wcf^yofthofc who were once the Objeds of our Detradion, but however this be, it is our Duty to try this wav and to endeavour to make it fuccccd, foi^ DEtRACriON. 177 for It IS the only way that can be made ufc StcT. X. of, and the moft proper in this Dclign. ^ In fine, it is their Duty to get profit to themfelvcs by the Faults which they liavc condemned in others. That is to lay, if they have decryed them for their Avarice and Debauchery, they arc to beware that they themfelves be not covetous and dc-^ bauched. Nothing could be more proper to corred us, than this Knowledge of the Faults and Sins of another, and that for this Reafon. Vice in another appears to us in all its moft filthy Colours, &C moft hideous Forms. It then appears to us entirely frightful, and nothing in my Opinion is more proper to make us hate it "f bales faid very well hereupon, fhat the tVay to live virtuoujly is to avoid ^hat ^e find Evil in others. ARTICLE HI. T The Duty of thofe in Prefence of 'whom People have DetraHed. H E Number of Fcrfons who hear Detradion^ is not Ids than of thofe who do detradt : Since what makes Detradlion, is,thcDifcovcring our Ncigh-f bour's Defefts to others v^ho hearken to us. So we fliail give fomc Rules to tlieic, and ftlCVYtbcm their Dutv. T ; ' Their %f% jt freattje sgainfl Sect.X. Their firft Duty is to take the Part of ^"^^"^^^"^^ the Abicnt and to cxcufe them as far as poflible. This is one of the principal Du- ties of Charity : and many times they who are content to remain Neuters, become guilty of Detradion. Here that Maxim LuVxi3»may be applied, He that is not Jor me is againji me. When therefoic you hear a Man ill fpokeh of, take his Part, and if you cannot cltajr him of what he is ac- cufed of, make known his good Qnali^ ties. This is fo much the more eafy as I believe there are none but what have fome good Qualities. Relate all that you know commendable in that Perfon, or all that you have heard others praife him for. This is fo much the more juft, as there is no Perfun how honeft and good foevcr he be, but would appear aMonfter,if welhould tell <5f all that is badin him, without rela* ting alfo what is good in the fame. Take the Apoftles themlelves ; you will fee them proud, ambitious, infatuated with a tem- poral Kingdom of the Miferies, in which every one expefted the highett Places : You will fee them either forfaking or denying their divineMafter, and quarrelling one with the other. So that if you do not caft your Eye on the other fide to admire their Zeal and a thoufand other Virtues which gained *Tiin.4.?. them the CroiJon of Righteoufnefs^ they willfecm toyouPcrlbns not only unworthy of DErRACflON. ^79 of thcApoftlelhip but even of the Name of Sect. X. Chriftians. K^^^r^^ If we know no Good to fay of Perfons, wemuft not pofitively cxcufe them. This would be both ridiculous and impoflible. But we muft exru/t them by Judgments of Charity, w^'ctiout getting too much enga- ged. Perhaps, we may fay to Detraftors, He you arc fpeaking of, had no Defign to carry matters fo far, and perhaps the Re- port that runs abroad is not very well grounded, ^c. We muft at leaft interpret the Evil we hear related, in the beft way we can, and give it the moft favourable Conftfudion it will bear. Thus St,AuJlin afted, when he wou'd excufe fertullian^ for faying that GOD is corporeal : In en- deavouring to clear hira of this Error, He faid, Th^Li TertufJiaffy by the Term of Bo- dy, only meant a Subftance ; which takes away the Herefy, it being certain that GOD is a Subftance, tho' net a bodily one. In fine, We Ihould endeavour to dimi- nifti the enormity of fomcCrimes,by (hew- ing that many Circumftanccs, which at- tend thofe who have committed them, de- fer ve to be weighed, and iliould rather in- duce us to abfolve them, or at leaft not to condemn them with fo much rigour. We mull above al), powerfully defend thofe whofe Crime is not well proved, and ihew that there is as much reafon to dif- T 4 ^Tcdil nio ji frcat'tfc dgainU Sect. X. credit what is faid to the difadvantagc of ^'^^^^'^ the abfent, as to believe it> and confe- quently we muft fufpend our Judgment or give 1l in on the charitable fide. Never** thelefs in cxcufing ourNeighbour, we muft never deviate from the following Rules : I. We are not to lye to excufc any one whatever. We muft never do Evil that Good may come of it. Lies officious for others, are damnable to thofc who fpeak them. i. We are not to excule oncFault by ano- ther, as to excufe Covetoufnefs in oneMan becaufe of the meannefs of his Soul ; Lux- ury in another becaufe of his Vanity, 3 . We are not to excufe one Man by accufing another. There are fometimes Occafions wherein we may fhew that nei^ ther the Accufer nor Accufed have done Wrong. For Inftancc, the Phyfognomift who accufed Socrates of being brutifti, given to Drunkennels and Unchaftity, had reafon therefor, becaufe fuch was his na- tural Difpofition. His Difciples, who on the contrary faid he was not fo, had rca- fun alio on their fide, becaufe he had for- faken thofe Vices. And this is of Impor- tance to be oblcrvcd to others on many Occafions in order to juftify both the one and the other : For there arc everyDay a thoufand Mifundcrftandings of this fort, >vh;^'h might he fo adjuftcd and cleared up. u If we can't excufe the abfcnt who are fpo- Sicr. X. ken ill of, we muft break off the Convcr- fation from Detradion. Here we muft make ufc of our Judgment, and our Penetration and fticwas muchWit in turning theCourfc of Detraftion, as others ftiew in detrading finely. Jf wc arc alone with a Perfon who in his Difcourfe with us detrafts from ano- ther, wc are with Moderation to make him perceive the wrong he is in,in detraft- ing. But if we arc in a Company, I don't advife to fuch a Thing. Then to rep-rovc Detraftors openly would be detrafting ojre's felf. We muft wait for a more favourable Ocaafion. We ihould then rather turn the Converfation on Matters of Piety or Wit, or at leaft of indifferent Nature ^ which is eafy forPerfbns who have cither Pietyor Wit, or anySway in theWorld, with refc- lence to their Birth or their Employment. If all thefc Ways won't do, we muft leave the Company, that fo we may not have the Mortification to hear GOD of- fended, or may not be tempted to detraft bur felves, or ftiew that thefe Difcourfes dilplcafe us becaufc wc think there is Evil in them. If ftill wc are withPcrlbns whom vve can't well get: dil-engagcd from, wc muft then keep a profound Silence, all the Time they are detracting, and as foon as the Converfation turns upon Matters of indifferent Natuve wc muft difcourfe as others ; a 8 2. A frcatife againji Sect. X. others : which will eafily fliew that wc kept fiience, only becaufe we did not love to detraft, and this will be a LelTon to o- thers. What is to be done after this, in order to ftrike as much as may be at the veryBottom of Detraftionjisnot to heark- en favourably to thofe who wou'd Ipread Detradion. If we fhew more Difcontent than Pleafure in hearing Detraftors, they "willfoon ceafe detrafting. " If Informers " perceive that we have moreAverfion for *^ them than for thofe whom they accufe; *^ they will foon break themfelves of this " evil Cuftom, and will reform this Sin ; " and after this they will hearken to us, " and we fhall become their Saviours, and " they will call us their iienefatlors, fays " St. Chryfoliom. '' And this we are o- bliged to do, fince to do otherwife is to fecond Dctraftors, to favour them, and confcquently to Sin : Which made one of the Ancients fay, " That Detractors ferve the Devil with their Mouths, as their Hearers, do with their Ears. " If wecan do no better, Let us make as tho' we did not mind what they fay • they will knov/ thereby, that at leall we have much Indifference for their Difcourfc. The Conduct oi Confiantine the great, delerves to be here remarked and imitated. Many of tlic Blfhops having prefented to this Piincc, Memorials containing reciprocal Complaints DEfltjICfTION. aSj Gamplaint$ of each other, and he being Sect.X. plagued almoft every Day with Accufati- n^^'v^^ ons of this fort, he referred them all to a certain Day ; and when the Day came, he faid to them, " All thefe Cgm plaints ^ ' Ihall be judged in the laft Day, by the ^^ common Judge of all Men. It does not " belong tome to take Notice of them j " to me, who am bvit a Man ; fincc the ^ Accufcrs and the Accufed arc Bi- ^' Ihops, who ought to do nothing that ^^ fubmits them to other's Judgment. «'' Let us then imitate the Mercy of GOD, " in pardoning one another,and renouncing jo2om«> " ^^ all thefe Accufations. Let us agree in ^i^- ^- ^^ " examining Queftions of Faith for which ^^ we are now aflembled ". And having faid this, he order'd all the Complaints to be call into the Fire. Thus when we hear Detraftors, we Ihould fay to them. Let us leave it toGOD 6c to theMagiftrates whom he has eftablifhed,to judge and to condemn Men* As for us who are private Peribns, 'tis none of cur Bufinefs. Let us imitate the Mercy of GOD towards all Men, and let us agree to examine our own Confci- ences, to blefe theLord,and to difcourfe on Matters of Faith, without ever difcover- ingAccufations injurious to our Neighbour. If we have not always Occafions to fpeak after this manner,we have at Icaft to think and act thus, Wc ought even with Plea- lur? a84 ^ Treatife agalnfi Sect^X. fuic to forget what was faid in ourPrcfcnce ' againft any one. Wc ought not eafily to beh'cvc ^11 the 111 that is faid of a Man, which is another Rule to be obfcrv'ed by thofc who hear Detraction. We mnft then remember, that we have a thoufand Times heard Falfities fpread abroad con- cerning our Neighbour, and even perhaps we our felves have been fomctimcs flan- der'd. That thus it is very poffiblc, that what is faid may be likewife falfc, at leaft with regard to Ibme Circumftances : And this fhould make Perfons very backward to believe and relate what they hear fpo- ken. At leaft we ought thro* Wifdom and Charity to do what the Law of GOD commands, and what earthly Tribunals ob- ferve thro' Juftice, namely not to condemn z Man but by the Mouth pt t ^^o or three unexceptionableWitneffes, Anu truly we believe eafily the Evil which is fpcken of others, but becaufe we are confcious that our felves are capable of committing the fame Faults, and are corrupt enough for that. But fuppofing at piefcnt here, that we are very certain, and have no room to doubt, but that theEvil laidof our Neigh- bour is very true, our Duty is to go and tell him of his Faults and his Vices, which perhaps he himfclf is utterly ignorant ot. Wc are to ftiew bim the W.rwp which " ■'" thcv DETRACTION. ^8 :> they do to hisReputatlon and his Intcrcfts, Sect. X. and cfpccially the Dan^xr which he expo- v^OT"^ fes hLmlclftc.: A linkingeccrnally intoHcll. ^ ;This .is a Duty which all Men in gene- ral are obliged to practifc towards eacli o- ther, according to Scripture Rule. My Brethren^ lays St. Pau\ If a Man be overtahen in a Faulty rcjlore fucb ^/^Hebj-n* One in the Sprit of Meeknefs. Eshort one another daily "while it is called to Dayy led any of you be hardned thro' the Deceitfulnefs of Sin, Let us conjider one another top'ovoketintoLove ^ goodji^orks. "^^' '"''^ If we read thofc Paffages attentively and confidcr what goes before and whatfollows» we Ihall fee that the Apoftlcis heie treat- ing of thofc Remonftrances, which parti- cular Perfons ftiould make to each other a- bout their Condud. Let us not then fay, That they regard only publick Perfons, as for Inftancc, Pajiots. For in Truth, Juf- tice requires this, of the latter, but Charity «♦* ^*^ requires it of 411 Men. Don t then leave this officious Care to Pallors only ^ doubt- Icfs you wou'd hardly be willing that they Ihpuld go to Heaven for you. There arc even manyOccafions where particular Per- fons are more proper to reprove a Man lo- vingly,than for hisPaftors to do it j againfl whom there arc a thoufandPcrfons fo preju- diced, that they wou'd fay,they did it only for Fafliion's fake, and not thro' any Love they ^85 ^ freatife againji Sect.X. they bofethemj or that wc were to hearken ^-''^^^ to them in the Pulpit, or at the Point of Death, and not at any other TiHie. More- over, Minifters don't know all Sinners nor all their Sins: and for many other Reafons they may not fucceed lo well in this mat- ter as others. They who wou'd fulfill thisDuty,muft ob- ferve fome Precautions, and follow fomc Rules, which we fhall mention. I. ThcFirJi is to fee to it, that they are exempt from grofs Faults, and efpccially from thofe which they blame in others. They mult get rid of 'em if they are fub- jeft to 'cm, as much as poflibly they can, that fo they may be in a Capacity toex- hort others* They muft take the Beam out of their own Eye, before they pretend to take the Mote out of their Neighbour's. Wemuftbe converted before we can exhort Sinners to Repentance, according to that Luke i»i Conini2ij^(j: ^f ourLord toPeter^ B^henthou Jhalt be converted^ Jtrengthen thy Bre-- thren. But efpccially we muft not have * fpokcn ill of them before. How can they take our Advice weU,ifwc fliew ourfelves their Enemies by defaming theiji ? Hovf can they think that it isj-cvc which guider our Steps towards them, if they fee that wc fail it^ (^ur Regards to them on many other Occafions ? How then can our In* ftruftioRS be profitable to them ? a. A a. Kfecond Vx^cmxion is, to ad withi^acT.X. a great deal of meeknels, prudence and cir-^-'^^'^^^ cumfpeftion, that foour Reproofs and Ex- hortations may have an happy Succcls ; What I fay is founded not only in the Scripture ; but alfo on this Confideration, that nothing grieves Men more, than to know that their Defcds aie known and blamed, and to fee that they are defpi- fcd for them. We muft then make ufc of all our Induftry and all our Zeal in endea- vouring to diminifli that which gives our Neighbour fo much unealinefs in Reproofs. We muftfometimes grieve withhim,fome- times lovingly fet forth the wrong his Sin does him, fometimes praift thofegood Aftions in him, which he has formerly done. We muft do our utmoft to find out his Temper, that fo we may in fome meafure conform our Difcourfe thereto. We ftiould make him fee, and endeavour to perfwadc him, that it is neither Pride nor any other evil Principle ; but only a Defire of his Converfion, which makes uj talk fo freely to him of the Irregularities in his Condud: We fliould affure him that in his Turn, on his Part, we fhould receive the CounfcJi he may give us, with Humility and a tradable Temper. We fliould ufe all Sorts ofMeans to fwecten this charitable Medici^ie, that fo when it does not appear fo diftaftful he may take it more cafily. 9. A aSS A Treatife again fi SacT.X. 3. A //^/r^ Precaution to be oblerve is, ^y^^^^^ not to name the Perfons w ho have Ipoken of our Neighbour's Dcfefts, Vrhoni we are now ccniuring, lell we let them together bythe Ears. 4. Lajily\ We are to pray to GOD to convert bcth the Detraftors and Detrafled, and to injreat him to pardon them both. This is ancffential Part of Charity. Hence Chap, ^. ^t.Jamci requires them to pray for one another. And Sujohn requires us to pray X joh.ch, fQj. aii fQj^s of Sinners, except thofe who Sin unto D^^/)b, that is, againft the Holy Spirit, vhich Sin being at prefent, always or for the moft part, unknown, it folio ws,tiat we are to pray fox the whole World. ARTICLE 7^;,: fhe Duties ^f thofe ^ho are fpokcn ill of AS to what regards this Sin, all the World is aiit'^e or paj[ri:e theicin. llpeak now ol thefe latter. Their /ry? Duty is to pardon thofe who have detracted from them, and not to will ^^^■' 4i oi- (jQ ^j^y £yjl ^g ^hem therefor. St. Paul truly rco^iircs that in all Ibrts of Cafes, wc fhould paxdon, others as Chrift has par- doned UF. Particularly, we gught not to detraft ^€tradt from thofe who have formerly dc- S^cr. X <:racted from us. Hence that laying of 6', V^^C^ PeUry Bs ye all of one M'lnd^ ha-Sing ^ '* ' *^ €Gm^aJjion one towards another. Love 0S Brethren^ be ptiful, be courteous. Not rendrlng evil for evil^ or railing foi^ •raiUng^but contrarywiJe.BJeJing • Knowr ing that ye are thereunto called^ that ye Jhould inherit a Blejfing. If we arc noc Co rcRder Evil for Evil, we ought not then to detraft from thofe who have fpokcn ill .of us before ; and it is our indilpenlable JDuty fificercly & honeftly to pardon themo This i^ v/hat thofe Perfons do no^c do, (tho" they pretend they are ready to do it, ) who tal]^ rngLch after this Manner ^ fuch a one fias detra£t^d from me, and if I had a mind to, I know y^ry w^ll how I cou''d revenge my feif, I cou'd .eaiily tell of many fhamc- ;ful Things of his^ which would very much jhurt his Reputation ^ but I v/on't pientioii *pm 9 and I pardon him the Injury he has done me, as J wilh that GOD may forgive Bie my Offences^ Althp' there may appear a great deal of good Humo.ur herein, yet there is certainly ^ great deal of hidden Malice. For can wc ^eny that it is a great Malignity, which woi;.'d infinua^e tbat .w.e have great Reafon ;t9 jcomplain of ^ Mod, to call him a Dc- lrador,an,d to fli.ew ithaC he has done ihapier foi Things^ the Publication whereof %you'iJ up A freaflfe agalnji Sect.X. avenge thofc whom he had detrafted from ? ^^'^v^^^ There is moreover a manitellContradiction herein, fince if we fincereiy pardon'd him the Wrong we complain of, we fhould n X talk of it, but hide it and forget it with Pleafure, and from hence it comes, that in the Scripture ftiic, to forget, to hide and pardon a Fault, are exprelt by the lame Terms and do often fignify the fameThing, Thus then to relate a Fault which we fay we forgive to a Man, is not to forgive it. Confcquently, to ask ot'GOD that he wou'd forgive us our TrcfpaiTes as we forgivcMcn their's ( with the Mouth only ) is to pray that he wou'd ftiew us no Mercy. \Vc mult imitate theExampleof6'.P/7///, who fays, They curfe and uoe blefs ; a Condud quite »ppofite to that of thofe who hold and teach, that it is lawful to kill, provided that it be in fccret and without Offence, thofe who detrad from us, it we can no other way flop their Detraction. This is the Jefuitical Dcciiion. I confefs that it appears hard to the Flelh not to revenge our felves on thofc who hurt our Credit; neverthelefs, this Difficulty will be much diminilhcd, if we refled, firft, that belkics GOD's ablolutcly requiring that he permits that we be covered with Shame and Infamy, in order to make us humble, and ready to acknowledge our Sins J to exercife our Patience and that wc may D ErRACflON. a^, xnay put in Pradlce many Virtues which Sect. X* we cou'd not prafticc, if the Malice of our ^-^nrNj: Enemies did not give us occahon therefor • fo that we may fay with reference to thofc who have fpoken ill of us, what / avii faid with regard toShimei^who curfed him, T'/je Lord hath faid u;f to him, CurjeDav'id. i$»m.i fel oiEpiffelus, '' I am not at all altonifocd " That they fpeak diiadvantagcoufly oi '^ me ; they might have iiid much more, ^' if they had known all my failings " Or, as an honcft Man of the 'lall Age, ''^ If ^' Men know my Imperfetlions luthro'iv, ^' how much more doesGOD know them? V 4 Home a^6 ^ATreatifc agalnB SiLCT.X. Some \vill doubtlefs objeel and fay,- t^a^ '^^i'^V'^ if wc d3 not detrad from rhofe who detraft from us^ and do not rail at thofc who rail at usy we fhall become the fport of all the World, who feeing that they can offend us without danger, will do it continually^ I anfwer, That our Detractions will do us jio good, and only draw on us more and piorethoic of others, as wehave clfewherc fhewn ^ and therefore that Silence is far more proper to quench this Fire, which our Railleries wouM but fupply with new Matter and Fuel We need only Ihcw that It is Charity or Prudence which makes us dumb ^ and the following Example may clear up what I have juft now faid. A Man having been cruelly railed at without making any Anfwer -one of the Company faid, He miifi needs be a Fooh i^ho iJooiCd bold his Peace onfuch an Occnfion, You are miftaken, replied the ^\^^A Foolknouo^ not how to Bridle his Tongue. If there be but few Pcrfons who fpeak ill of us, wc may make ufe of the Anfwer which the Poet Tajjb made on account of a Man who fpake ill of him to all that he faw : // is better^ faid 'fa£b^ for him to fpeak ill of me to all the Jiurld^than if all ihe Horld did Jpeak ill of me to him. My lull Advice to the Detracted is,That theywou'd iVce thcmfelves from all their Vitcf^ not only that fo they may give no "' occifien D ETR J c r 1 O U ^^/ Qc€^iion to others for Dctraclloii, but alfoSECT.X; that fo Hell may not cxercifc it's rage upon ^^"'^^''^^ them. This is a Duty which is common to them with aliChriftians,and which thoic whom \Yc are fpcaking of may pradicc fo much the more eafily, as they arc informcJ of their Vices by the Mouth of others, and by that means know them the better. This ^^^^^ ^ ^,. is the way to gather Grapes of Thorns and Figs of Thiftles, and Pearls from a Dung- hill, in a word, to get Good out of Evil ; fuch will profit much by the Dctracliors of others, fince being ftiewn their Faults by them, and being apprifed that they are bh- med for them, they are furniihed with Means and Motives to get rid of 'em. Thus in fome fort,they ought to take it in good part of them whobaikbite them. Perhaps they did it thro'Envy orHatred • but whan Matters it, what was their Intention, or from what Principle they fpake, if we can turn to ourSalvation,what will perhaps one Day prove the Caufe of their Deftruction? Here we may apply what St. Faul laid, Some f reach CHR I Sf of Envy £f Strife ^^li^^'l OfContetition and notftncereJy^ fuppo/ing to add JjJi^on to my Bonds. IVbat tben^ Notwitbjianding every way^ whether tn Pretence or in Truth, C HRIST^is p-ca^ ched^and I therein do rejoice,yea and ivill rejoice. Thus how ill ibever the Motive i'nay be which Dctradors adfrom,weknovv ri^S 'A Treatifc againji Sect. X. our Vices by their Dctraftions, wc may '^^^''^^^^ improve their Malice to oar Advantage, and it is at this that we may rejoice. ti:^:? The Ufes of this Section. HE R E it muft be remarked, That al- tho' we have divided this Sedion in- to foar different Articles, neverthelels v/hat we have laid under the one may agree to each of the other Thrce^ and even of the three other together. For Example the Advice we gave not to detract, may alfo ferve tor Detradors, for thofe who hear Detraction, and for theDetradcd ; for thcle who have been active and paffis'-e in the Sin ; the Reafon of this is, becaufe that it may very well happen, and often does,that they who detrafl do often hear others de- trad, and are likewife thcmfelves dctra'ieJ from. Thus m this Regird thcfc four Articles miy agree to one Perfon. Thefe Counlcls and Duties apnearing to me of the laft Importance for the Sabjcd I have been treating of, and containing whrit is moft effcncial to be practiced by us, whether wc be the Authors,or thcOb- jcds, or the Hearers of Dctradion, I wouM carnelllv advifc that they be followed and put in Pradice. Ncverthelcfs the more profitable profitable they appear to me, the more I Sect. X. fear they vvon*t be followed, becaufe com- ^•'O^^^ monly the moft excellent Things arc the moft difficult, fuch are fome of the Da ics we have mencioned, and it is thisDifficalty that will hinder Men. Yet even this ought not to difcouragc 'em fo much as to ftir them up to ask of the GOD of Love, whofe Power is unli- mited and able to help them5that he wou'd affift them to follow what his Word, and that Reafon which he has endowed them with, do prefcribe them to do. T'he Conclufmi of this freatife. TT E R E we might takeOccafionftrong- "*--*• ly to exhort Perfons to leave off De- traaion. But being perfwaded that thofe Exhortations we have made thro' the whole Courfe of this Treatife, arc capable of ma- king Impreffion on the Hearts, where the Love of GODjof ourNeighbour,and of our felves is not entirely quenched, there re- mains but little for us to do to finifh this Treatife. I exhort you to confider, That the Dc- traftor fins eflcntially againll Charity, and thereby fhews that he hasnoReligion ar all^ for how can a Man have any Religion, if ^ he ^ow i^ freatife againfi SacT.X. he love neither GOD or his Neighbour I W^^^ Which is the fulfilling of the Law. Can we love our Neighbour when we hurt him in thofe things which he efteems as his grcateft Advantage in the World, even his ^ Credit and Reputation ? Can we love him> '^•" as wc love our felves, if while we take fo inuch Care to hide our own Defects, and arc fo troubled if they are known abroad, we cxpofe his fo openly ? Can we alfo fay, That we love GOD, if we hate thofe who arc formed after his Image ? And moreover, If any one love not his Brother whom he fees, how can he love GOD whom he hath not feen fo dif«» tinftly ? And if we have not Charity, how can we enter intp Heaven, which is the Source and the Example of Love ? That Heaven, where GOD the Father v?iU caufe the Saints to tafte the moft deli- cious Effects of his Love, in which their Welfare confifts : That Heaven, where the Saints fhall burn with Zeal and Love for theirCreator,ia which theii:Glory confifts: That Heaven, from whence the Lord of the World, flieds abroad his Bleffings and Favours on all thelnhabitants of thcEarth, even the moft Wicked. Without Charity how can we enter into that Paradifc, from whence Jefus Chrift. dcfccnded only thro' the Eftcd of hisLovc for Mankind, and to redeem them by the Price D Efk y^ crto ]sr. 501 Price of his own Blood ; and whither heSncT.X. afcended again to exercile ftill his Love >-^'V^ towards them, by interceding on their Be- half before GOD his Father ? In fine, How can we expeft without Charity to enter into that Heaven from whence the Holy Spirit by an Effcft of his Love, pours down upon Men his Graces and Gifts, which comfort, which rcgenc-* Tate,which prepare them for anlnheritajice in Hean)en ? On the other Hand, when we have fin* ncd a^ainft Charity by Detraction, may we not fear to be the Companions of Devils, fince an evil Tongue is already fat on Fire f j,,^. •> of Hell, as 5. James fays ? ^ ^^^ i^ Let us endeavour to live allfo lifceChriC- tians, that we may have no Caufe, no Rca- fon to fpeak ill one of another. Let us avoid the very appearance of Evil, fo as to give no Ground for rafti Judgments. Let us well confider every Time that we Sin fo as that others know of our Sins we mi- ferably Scandalize them, fmce we are the Occafions of theirEvil fpeaking,and confc- quently of their Sin, which is an Aggrava- tion of thofe Sins which occafion Detraction. I hope they who read this Trcatife will icceive thefe Exhortations of mine with Complacency, fince they have five Charac- ters which arc, it feems to me^ very fit to Hiai^c them efficacious* _. —' u The 502 A freatife againji Sect.X. I. The firft of thofeCharadcrs which an. ^^"""^^"^ Exhortation ought to have, in order that it may move and make ImpreiTion, is, that the Things exhorted to, be of Importance, Now nothing is of greater Conkquencc than the Charity, or rather the Salvation %ve exhort Men to attain unto, by avoid- ing Detradtion. 2. A fecond CharaiSer which Exhorta- tions Ihould have that fo they may be fol- lowed is, that they be neceflary and well applied to the Thing exhorted unto, and to the Time in which it is $o be done. I leckon that alfo on this regard it will be granted, that there is ground, and that it is proper at this prefcnt Time, it ever \\ was, to exhort the World to abftain from De- traction, fince perhaps there never was an Age wherein it was more in Vogue than the prefcnt. Languages have been often changed, Words have been different in their Pronunciation, their termination and their fignification. Every Nation according to their Language has varioufly expreft their Detractions • but at all Timco, in all Na- tioDS,and at prefcnt as much and more than ever, Detraftion has upheld and does up- hold it's Empire in the World. 3. We ought. Thirdly, to give way to Exhortations founded on Ihong Motives, powerful Reafons and ncccffary Advice. DE7RACriONr 30J In this Regard wc are perfvvaded^ That Sect. X. all which has been faid againft Detraction, ^-'^^W is very ftrong, very preffing, and very ne- ceffary. 4. Fourthly, Wc are more ready to obey Exhortations, when we are perlwadcd of Jie Sincerity of thofe who Exhort. As I jcan have no Advantage from deceiving o- thers,and on the contrary fhould be accoun- table unto a righteous GOD for fo doing, you ought to be convinced of my Sincerity. 5. Laftly, Exhortations aie more per- fvvafive, when we know that he who gives them, has a right thereto. This Right be- longs to ail Men. It is one of their Duties to exhort their Neighbours to forfake their Crimes, and to follow Virtue, as has been already fhcwn, and therefore they have Right to exhort Men to Ihun Detraction, luk.^;.i4 And to do this I conjure them by the loving Kindnefs ofChrift^who prayed to hisFatner for his very Murderers. And may the great GOD accompany this Work with his Blelling, and his Grace for theSandifi- cadon, and the eternal Salvation qI thofr who ihall read it. AM E R- ■mJtfl - >-c>*^^-/^ S4t^ m >>t '#'t-M6