1 1 1 /^^ '^ PRINCETON, N. J. | ^ ® ■ Part of the I Z ADDJSOX ALEXANDER LIBRARY, *> ll whicj was presented by 4 V Messrs. R. L. and A. Stuart. \\) f'B?"9r84 Ta5~B7 1854 Brown, John, 1722-1787. I An essay towards an easy, plain, practical and »£<^^se^E^gc^^g»9s^^^e ^^Agf^^^ ^ cAclUatyuy . 'C/niyx ayur{^itii you, to receive himself, and all his full and everlasting salvation, offered to you in the gospel, ' freely, without money and without price !' Al is ! my dear young men and women, why are you so prone to hunt after, listen to, and comply with everj- temptation of Satan, your destroyer; — every en- ticement of your vain companions : — every siiigotion of your foolish and wicked heart, — to your temporal and eternal ruin : — and yet so deaf, so averse to, and ob- btinale against the most earnest entreaties of tiic great God, your Saviour ? — Do they love you more ; or have thoy, or will they, or can they do more, for your everlasting welfare, than he?— Wliy, by your ready compliance with every thing ruinous — and by your obstinate resistance of all attempts to promote your true holiness and happiness, — do you 1 ibour to pull down everlasting destruction upon your own heads ? — Wiiy thus labour to extract your most dreadful ruin from all the perfections of a gracious God;— from all the persons of the Godhead ;— from all his purposes, covenants, words, and works ; — and from all persons, and their actions, with whom you are connected, or do converse ? Nay, my beloved children, whom I wish for ray 'joy and crown in t e day of t "^ Lord.'— When so much of the best of your time is already spent in vanity and wrath ;— when death, judq^ment, and etarnity hasten to meet you ;— when your judgment now of a long time ' lingereth not,' your ' damnation slumbereth not ;' — why should you delay your deepest concern, about your eternal salvation, o in mo- ment more ? — V/liy defer coming to an inilnitely gracious Redeemer,—to the 'Lord God merciful and gracious, long-suffering, and abundant in goodnes.« and truth, keeping mercy for thousands, and forgiving iniquity transgression, and sin ?'— Why delay, when called 'from darkness' to Go J's • Di.irv ellous light ;' c.illed to receive ' redemption tlirough Jesus' blood ;— to receive out of his fulness and grace for grace;— called to the fellowship of God's Son;'— called to be ' heirs of God, and joint heirs with Christ ?' — Why lose another year, another month, another liour, an- other moment, without the enjoym^-ut, tiic iifinit-^ly sweet enjoyment, of God ia Christ, as your Father. Huobaad, Friend, and Portion » Why hide yourselves 12 AN ADDRESS TO THE YOUNG READERS, ETC. 'among the stuff' of vain or earthly cares, when a 'kingdom which cannot be moved,' is offered unto you ? — Why, to render your eternal damnation more cer- tain, and more dreadful, every moment, and your way of escape more difficult, — should you remain among devils, and carnal companions, and filthy lusts, when Jesus is lifting up his voice and crying, ' Whosoever will let him come unto me. — Come unto me all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. Him that cometh unto me I will in no wise cast out. — Arise my love, my polluted one, and come away. Come with me from Lebanon, with me from Lebanon. — Come ye to the waters ; yea, come, buy wine and milk, witliout money and without price. Incline your ear, and come unto me ; hear, and your soul shall live : and I will make an everlasting covenant with you, even the sure mercies of David.' Eat ye ' that which is good,' and let your soul delight itself ' in fatness. Behold I stand at the door ' of thine heart, ' and knock : Open to me, my sister, my love, my ' defiled ; ' for my head is filled with the dew, and my locks with the drops of the night.' When you hasten from storms, from trouble, from outward danger, why not make haste to Jesus, the refuge, the hope, set before you? — ^When he saith, 'To-day if ye will hear my voice,' harden not 'your hearts; now is the accepted time; now is the day of salvation ;' why should you say. To-morrow ? When he waits to be gracious, and exalteth himself to ' shew mercy,' — why tire out his pa- tience till he 'shut up all his tender mercies in his wrath ?' Is ' it a small thing for you to weary men,' — weary parents, and ministers ? 'But will ye weary my God also ?' Lord Jesus, make haste to convince, to convert, to save, the rising generation in Britain. They perish — they perish ! O Redeemer, make no tarrying. Now be an accepted time ; now be a day of salvation. Save now, O Lord, we beseech thee ; send noic prosperity. iM^.: CATECHISM. Quest. I. What is (he chief end of man? Answ. Man's chief end is to glorify God, and to enjoy him for ever. Q. What do you mean by that end which all men pro- pose in their actions 1 — A. That which they seek to obtain in and by their actions. Q. What oun^ht man to make his chief or highest end ? — A. Tlie glorifyino^ and enjoying of God, Rom. ix. 36. Q. Why ought man to make the glory of God liis chief end? — A. Because it was God's chief end in making, pre- serving, and redeeming man, Prov. xvi. 4. Q. May man have no other end in any of his actions ? — A. Yes ; but it must be a subordinate end, which tends to obtain the chief end, 1 Cor. x. 31. Q. Wliat may be some of men's subordinate ends'? — A. To provide food and raiment, and procure health, peace, liberty, and safety to themselves or others. Q. How many parts doth man's chief end consist of? — A. Two ; his chief duty, which is to glorify God ; and his chief happiness, which is to enjoij God. Q. How is the glory of God usually distinguislied ? — A. Into his essential and declarative glory. Q. What is the essential glory of God ? — A. That which he is and hath in himself^ Exod. xiii. 14. Q. What is God's declarative glory 1 — A. The shewing forth of his glory in and by his creatures, Isa. v. 16. Q. Can we add any thing to tliat glory which God hath in himself? — A. No ; for it is infinite. Job xi. 7. Q, How then do creatures glorify God ? — A. By shew- ing forth or declaring that he is glorious. Q. How do beasts and lifeless creatures glorify God ? — A. God shews forth his glory in and by them. Q. How do devils and wicked men glorify God ? — A. Not willingly ; but God over-rules their works, however sinful, to his own glory, Psalm Ixxvi. 10. Q. How ought angels and men to glorify God ? — A. By 14 OF man's chief end. doing all things with a view to shew forth and declare his glorj, Psalm xcvi. 7, and cvii. 8, 15, 21. Q. With what ought we to glorify God 1 — A. With our hearts, hps, and lives. Psalm ciii. 1. Q. How should we glorify God with our hearts 1 — A. By knowing, trusting in, loving, admiring, adoring, and remem- bering him, 1 Chron. xxivii. 9, Psalm ciii. 1. Q. How should we glorify him with our lips'? — A. By praying to, praising, and commending him. How should we glorify him with our lives 1 — A. By doing every thing which he commands out of love to him, Deut. X. 12, Matth. xvii. 37, 38. Q. How did Adam in innocency glorify God 1 — A. By giving perfect obedience to his law, Eccl. vii. 29. Q. Do men still answer their chief end in glorifying God 1 — A. No ; All men have sinned, and come short of the glory of God, Rom. iii. 9—23. Q. Hath God then lost his end in making man ? — A. No ; he will glorify his justice in damning some men, and his mercy in saving others, Rom. ix. 22, 23. Q. Who hath most eminently glorified God ? — A. Christ. Q. Where hath Christ glorified God? — A. Both on earth and in heaven, Heb. i. 3. Q. HoAV did Christ glorify God on eartli? — A. By obey- ing his law, and suffering his wrath, in the room of elect sinners, John xvii. 4, Matth. xx. 28. Q. How doth Christ glorify God in heaven 1 — A. By pleading for his elect, and sending his Spirit to apply his purchased redemption to them, John xiv. 16, 17. Q. When doth a sinner begin to glorify God aright 1 — A. When he first believeth in Christ, 1 John v. 10. Q. How doth faith or believing glorify God 1 — A. It credits his word, unites us to Christ, and so makes us fruit- ful in good works, Rom. v. 20, John xv. 5. Q. Wh at is a good vrork ? — A. A work commanded by God's law, performed in Jiis strengtli, from a love to, and with a view of glorifying him. Q. Doth faith make us glorifv' God in all our works 1 — A. Yes ; 1 Cor. x. 31, Psalm cxv. J, 2, Rom. xiv. 8. Q. How doth faith make us glorify God in our natural actions, as eating or drinking, &c. 1 — A. By making us seek and receive a covenant-right to, and thank God for our food and raiment ; and use them to fit our bodies for the eervice of God, Rom. viii. 32, Deut^ viii. 10. OF man's chief ExND. 15 Q. How doth faitJi make us glorify God in our civil bu- siness 1 — A. Bv makins: us diligent in our trades and call- ings, from a regard to God's command ; and causing us to use the gains of them to his glory, Isa. xxiii. 18. Q. How doth faith make us glorify God in religious ser- vices 1 — A. It makes us perform them in the strength of Christ's Spirit, and look for acceptance of them only through his merit and intercession, 1 Peter ii. 5. Q. What should we aim at next to the glorifying of God? — A. The enjoying of him, Psalm xliii. 4. Q. What is meant by the enjoying of God 1 — A. The receiving, living on, and rejoicing in him as our portion, Psalm xvi. 5, 6, Isa. Ix. 19, 20. Q. Wliy should we seek to enjoy God ? — A. Because he only is a suitable and sufficient person for our souls, Hab. iii. 17, 18, Psalm cxlii. 4, 5, Ixxiii. 25, 26. Q. Why cannot the riches, honours, and pleasures of this world be a satisfying portion to our souls 1 — A. Because they are vain and empty, unsuited to the spiritual nature, and disproportionate to the boundless desires of our immor- tal souls, Matth. xvi. 26, Psalm Ixxiii. 25. Q. How did Adam in innocency enjoy God ? — A. By yjerfect friendship and fellowship. But sin quickly broke up that, Isa. lix. 2, Rom. v. 11, Gen. iii. Q. What do all men now by nature enjoy instead of God] — A. Sin, Satan, and the world, 1 John ii. 16. Q. How do they enjoy these ? — A. They have sin as their pleasure, Satan as their prince and father, and the world as their portion, Heb. xi. 25, Jolin viii. 44. Q. Can we enjoy God in our natural estate? — A. No; for what communion hath light tcith darkness^ or Christ with Belial? 2 Cor. vi. 14, 15. Q. Is there any way to recover the lost enjovment of God ?— A. Yes, by Christ alone. Acts iv. 12, Epii. ii. 18. Q. When doth a sinner first begin to enjoy God 1 — A. When he first receives Christ, and rests on him. Q. In what means and ordinances is God to be enjoyed? — A. Ill prayer, reading or hearing God's word, medita- tion, fasting, receiving the sacraments, &c. Q. Do the saints often enjoy God in these ordinances? — A. Yes ; for these are their great delight, and they are much engaged in them. Psalm xxvii. 4, and Ixxxiv. 10. Q. What satisfaction doth a soul find in tlie enjoyment 16 of God ? — A. Unspeakably more than in the abundance of all worldly good things, Psalm iv. 6 — 8. Q. Where and when do the saints enjoy God 1 — A. On earth in this life, and in heaven hereafter. Q. How is God enjoyed in this life on earth 1 — A. By our receiving the influences of his grace, and having his love shed abroad in our hearts, 1 John i. 3. 7. Q. How is God enjoyed in heaven? — A. By our being, ever with him, and receiving that fulness of joy which is at his right hand, Psalm xvi. 11, and xvii. 15. Q. Wherein doth the enjoyment of God on earth, and that in heaven agree ] — A. It is the same God who is en- joyed ; and the enjoyment of him here as truly humbles and satisfies the heart, as that in heaven. Q. In what do they differ 1 — A . In the manner and mea- sure of enjoyment. Q. How do they differ in the 7nanner of enjoyment ? — A. Here God often hides himself, and we enjoy him through means and ordinances as through a glass darkly ; but in heaven we will enjoy him uninterruptedly and immediately, and see him face to face, 1 Cor. xiii. 12. Q. How do they difier in the measure of enjoyment 1 — A. Here we enjoy God only in part; but hereafter we shall enjoy him fully, 1 Cor. xiii. 12, 1 John iii. 2. Q. Shall the saints in heaven receive into their souls all the infinite fulness and sweetness that is in God 1 — A. No ; but their finite souls shall be filled with as much of it as they can hold, Eph. iii. 19, Psalm xvii. 15. Q. What is the sure pledge and earnest of our enjoying God in heaven? — A. Our enjoyment of him here, Psalm Ixxiii. 24. 26. Q. Why is the glorifying of God placed before the en- joyment of him 1 — A. Because the glory of God is of more value than our happiness, Isa. xl. 17. Q. Whether is our glorifying or enjoying of God first in order 1 — A. We must first enjoy God in his gracious influ- ences, and then glorify him ; and this leads on to further enjoyment of him. Psalm cxix. 32. Q,. Is our delight in the glory or glorious excellencies of God as satisfying to us, to be our chief end or motive in our actions, religious or moral? — A. No ; but our shewing forth the honour of these glorious excellencies, Isa. ii. 11, Psal. xvi. 4, Isa. xliii. 21. Q. Why rnay we not make our own delight in the glory * OP THE SCRIPTURES. 17 of God as satisiying to our desires, our chief end and mo- tive 1 — A. Because this would be a setting up of our own happiness above the glory of God. Q. Who alone may expect to enjoy God in heaven 1 — A. Only such as glorify him an earth, Heb. xii. 14. Q. Why are the glorifying and enjoying of God joined as one chief end ? — A. Because none can obtain or rightly ^seek the one without the other, 1 Cor. xv. 58. Q. How do we most highly glorify God 1 — A. By re- ceiving and enjoying him most fully. Q. What chiefly secures our enjoyment of God ? — A. The concern of the glory of God in it. Q. How is the glory of God concerned in our enjoy- ment of him? — A. All his attributes are in Christ engaged for our enjoyment of him ; and their glory shines brightly in fulfilling these engagements, Isa. xxx. 18. Q. How long shall the saints glorify and enjoy God 1 — A. To all eternity ; for we shall ever be loith the Lord, 1 Thess. iv. 17, Isa. Ix. 19, 20. Q. What are tiie grounds which secure the eternal en- joyment of God to believers ? — A. The infinite and eternal love of God ; the extent of his promise ; and the infinite merit, and eternal intercession of Christ. .^^^ - ^ Quest. 2. What rule hath God given to direct tis, how loe may glorify and enjoy him 7 Answ. The word of God, which is contained in the scriptures of the Old and New Testament, is the only rule to direct us how we may glorify and enjoy him. Q. Whence is it that we need a rule to direct us how to glorify and enjoy God ? — A. Because God is our sovereign, and being infinite, is so much vmknown to us. Q. Who alone can give us a rule for these ends 1 — A. God only ; for he only hath sufficient wisdom and authori- ty to prescribe a sufficient rule, 2 Tim. iii. 16, 17. Q. What is the rule which God hath given for man's di- rection % — A. The declaration of his own will. Q. How did God shew this rule to Adam before the fall ? — A. Mostly by the light of nature within him, and the works of creation and providence without him. Q. Did he not shew his will wholly to Adam by these means? — A. No ; the time of the Sabbath, and the prohi- 18 OF THE SCRIPTURES. bition to eat of the tree of knowledge, were made known to him by hnmediate revelation, Gen. ii. Q. How far are the light of nature, and works of crea- tion and providence, now of use as a rule to men? — A. They so far make known the perfections of God, and part of our duty, as renders us inexcusable when we disobey liim, Rom. i. 20, and ii. 14, 15. Q. Are these things now a sufficient rule to lead us to happiness ? — A. No ; for sin hath made us blind and fool- ish in the matters of God, 1 Cor. ii. 14. Q. If our reason were as extensive as ever Adam's was, could it now lead us to holiness or happiness 1 — A. No; for sin hath fixed a gulf between God and us, through which our reason, however extensive, could never shew us a pas- sage, Isa. xlix. 24. Q. Hath God given us any rule that can direct sinful men to holiness and happiness 'I — A. Yes ; the Bible, or holy scriptures, 2 Peter i. 19 — 21. Q. Why is that rule called the Bible or Book ? — A. Be- cause it is far better than all other books. Q. What makes it sol — A. It is the uwi'd of God, the testament of Christ, and of the greatest use to men. Q. Wiiyare^ie scriptures called the word of God] — A. Because they were given by the inspiration of his Spirit, 2 Peter i. 21, Heb. i. 1, 2 Tim. iii. 15, 16, 17. Q. How do you prove the scriptures to be the word of God ? — A. By the stamp of God that is to be seen upon them ; for none can speak like him, John vi. 63. Q. What is that stamp of God which is imprinted upon the scriptures 1 — A. That majesty, hohness, light, and effi- cacy which appear in them, Psalm xiv. 7, 8, 9. Q. Wherein doth the majesty of the scriptures appear ? — A. God therein is described, and speaks in the most lofty manner : therein sins are forbidden which God only can know or condemn ; duties required that God only can com- mand ; and promises and threatenings are made which God only can accomplish, Isa. Ivii. 15, 16. Q. What divine holiness appears in the scriptures 1 — A. There every holy thing is strictly required, and every un- holy thing is forbidden ; and all tlie means and motives to perform duty, and avoid sin, are clearly shown, and warmly pressed, 1 Pet. i. 18 — ^23. Q. What divine light appears in the scriptures ? — A. or THE SCRIPTURES. 19 There mysteries are revealed which God only knew, or can comprehend, Col. i. 26, 1 Tim. iii. 16. Q. What are some of those mysteries 1 — A. The mys- ^C tery of the persons in one Godhead ; of Ciirist, the Son of God, his becoming man ; and our union with him, &:.c. ^ John V. 8, Isa. vii. 14, Eph. v. 30. 32. Q. What divine efficacy or power have the scriptures?-— A. They are the means of convincing, converting, and quickening dead and obstinate sinners ; and of comforting those that are cast down, Psal. xix. 7, 8. Q. By what other arguments may we be convinced that the scriptures are the word of God 1 — A. By their antiqui- ty, harmony, scope, success, accomplishment of prophecies, and confirmation by miracles and tiie blood of martyrs. Q. What is their antiquity ? — A. Their being written in part before all other books ; and giving us the only rational account of ancient things, such as the creation, the fall, flood, and dispersion of men at Babel. Q. What do you call the harmonij of the scriptures? — A. The agreement of every part one with another. Q. How is this a proof of their being the word of God ?— A. Because it is impossible that such a number of writers, in so many different ages and places, could ever of them- selves so agree, in opposition to the common inclinations of men. Q. Doth no part of scripture really contradict another ? — A. No ; though some parts seem to contradict others, as John X. 30, with xiv. 28. Q. How may seemingly contradictory scriptures be re- conciled 1 — A. By considering that these different scrip- tures either speak of different things, or of different views of the same thing, Rom. i. 3, 4, and ix. 6. Q. What is the scope and design of the scriptures 1 — A. To humble all men, and give all the glory to God. Q. What success have the scriptures had ? — A. The gross manners of many nations have been reformed ; and multi- tudes of most wicked men have been gained to deny ungod- Hness and worldly lusts, and to hve soberly, righteously, and godly, by means of the scriptures, though published by the meanest instruments, notwithstanding the combined op- position of hell and earth against them. Acts i — xx. Q. Of what prophecies doth the accomplishment prove the scriptures to be the word of God? — A. The prophecies of Israel's entrance into, and deliverance from Egypt and 30 OF THE SCRIPTURES. Babylon ; and of the destruction of Chaldea, Egypt and Tyre; and of the rise and fall of the Persian, Grecian, and Roihan Empires ; and of the birth and deatli of Christ, rescrym^ his creatures ? — A. His upholding them in tlscir being and works. Q. What need is there of God's preserving his creatures 1 — A. Because otherwise they would return to nothing. Q. Wiiat is meant by God's governing his creatures 1 — A. Directing them to the ends he hath appointed them. Q. What need is there of God's governing all things ? — A. Because otherwise they would run into confusion. Q. Whence do you prove, that God preserves and governs all things'? — A. From the scripture and reason. Q. How doth the scripture prove it? — A. It declares that God upholds cdl things and directs our steps, ^iwd that we live and move in him: and it foretold a multitude of events before they took place, Heb. i. 3, &lq,. Q. How doth reason prove it 1 — A. It shews, that with- out God, so many jarring creatures could never be preserv- 59 ed in such order, or directed to one common end : nor could sun, moon, stars, &c., observe such exact order and revolutions, nor any miraculous event happen. Q. What is the object of God's providence 1 — A. All his creatures, and all their actions. Psalm ciii. 19. Q. How is God's providence exercised about angels 1 — A. In permitting some to sin, and lie therem ; establishing the rest in holiness and happiness, and employing them in the administration of his mercy and justice. Q. How is God's providence peculiarly exercised about men 1 — A, In giving or withholding from them the ordina- ry means of salvation, and enabling them to improve, or suffering them to abuse these means, as he sees meet, Psal. cxlvii. 19, 20. Rom. ix. Q. About whom is God's providence especially exer- cised 1 — -A, About his church, especially about Christ her head, and his real members, Isa. xhii. 1, «fec. Q. How prove you that God's providence extends to the meanest creatures ? — A. Because the hairs of our heads are numbered ; and sparrows cannot fall to the ground without him, Matth. x. 29, 30. Q. Is it not mean for God to care for such inconsidera- ble things 1 — A. No ; whatever he hath made, is not below his care : his care of high creatures shews his majesty, and his care of the meanest creature shews his great condescen- sion, Matth. vi. 30, Psalm civ. Q. Are not all creatures equally mean when compared with God ? — A. Yes ; for he is infinite, and they are all finite ; and so equally at an infinite distance from him. Q. What actions of creatures are the objects of God's providence 1 — A. All their actions, whether natural, acci- dental, or moral. Col. i. 17, Job xxxviii — xli. Q. How is God's providence exercised about natural ac- tions 1 — A. In exciting the natural instinct of creatures, and giving them power and opportunity to follow it. Q,. How is God's providence exercised about casual or accidental actions, as killing a man with a bow-shot at a venture, &c.? — A. In joining or disjoining the circumstan- ces of these actions otherwise than the actors thereof intend- ed, Exod. xxi. 13, 2 Kings xxii. 34. Q. How is God's providence more generally exercised about moral and reasonable actions ? — A. In prescribing a law to be the rule of them, and in annexing rewards and punishments to them, Exod. xx., Deut. xxviii. 60 Q. How may moral actions be distinguished ? — A Into good and evil, Deut. xxviii. 1. 15. Q. Are no reasonable actions indifferent, that is neither good nor evil 1 — A. They may be indifferent in their na- ture ; but with respect to their manner and end, they must be eitlier good or evil, 1 Tim. i. 5, 6. Q. How is God's providence specially exercised about good actions'? — A. In stirring up to, directing in, and giv- ing power and opportunity for them, Phil, ii. 12, 13. Q. How is God's providence exercised about sinful ac- tions? — A. In concurring to the substance of the act; and in permitting, bounding, and over-ruling to his own glory the sinfulness of it, Isa. xxxvii. 29. Q. Doth not this way make God the author of sin ? — A. No ; when God so hates and punishes sin, he can never in any respect be the author of it, Zeph. iii. 6. Q. Doth God's exciting or concurring in actions any way check the free will of creatures? — ^A. No. Q. Whence is it then that men raise an outcry against God's providential concurrence with all, especially sinful actions, as if that and his decree put a farce upon the will of creatures? — A. It arises from their great pride and ig- norance, in measuring God by themselves; for, because they could not effect the matter of a sinful action, and not its sinfulness, neither absolutely decree, nor infallibly de- termine another to an action, without forcing his will, they conclude that God is incapable to do it ; forgetting that as the heavens are high above the earth, so are God's ways above our ways, Isa. Iv. 9. Q. How is God's providence with respect to actions or- dinarily called ? — A. His providence about moral actions is called his moral government ; and his providence about all other motions or actions, is called his natural government, Q. How may the providence of God with respect to its effects be distinguished? — A. Into ordinary and extraordi- nary. Gen. xxix. and xix. Q. What call you ordinary providence? — A. That which produces common events by ordinary means. Q. What call you God's extraordinary providence? — A. That which produceth miracles, Exod. vii. — xiv. Q. What is a miracle? — A. An event beyond or con- Inuy to the power of second causes, as raising the dead, healing the sick, by a word, &-c. 2 Kings iv. &,c. 61 Q. In what is God's providence often dark and mysie- rious 1 — A. In its secret track and outward appearance. Q. How is it mysterious in its secret track? — A. In bringing about the most glorious events by the most im- probable means, Esther i. — x. Acts ii. 6lc. Q. What are some instances of this ? — A. Joseph's dig- nity in Egypt was brought about by hatred, slavery, and imprisonment ; and Christ's exaltation, and his people's salvation, by his cursed and shameful death. Q. What doth this teach us? — A. To believe always that God is taking the best way to accomplish his promise though providence seem to contradict it. Q. How is God's providence mysterious in its outward appearance 1 — A. In the temporal prosperity of the wicked, and the adversity of God's dearest saints, Psal. Ixxiii. Q. W^hy doth God take this course 1 — A . To shew his own contempt of worldly things, wean his people's hearts from the world, and gain them to himself. Q. Whether are saints losers or gainers, when God emp- tieth them of worldly good things, in order to gain them to himself? — A. They are the greatest gainers. Q. When shall all dark providences be cleared up ? — A. When we enter on the state of glory in heaven. Q. What will the saints then think and say of all pro- vidences ? — A. They will admire the love, grace, and wis- dom that ran through them all ; and with joy and thanks- giving cry out, He hath done all things icell. Q. What attributes of God are manifested in the works of providence ? — A. His independency, infinity, wisdom, power, holiness, justice, goodness, truth, &.c. Q. 12. What special act of jyrovidence did God ex- ercise toward man in the estate iDherein he toas created? A. When God had created man, he entered into a covenant of life with him upon condition of perfect obedience ; forbidding him to eat of the tree of know- ledge of good and evil upon the pain of death. Q. What part of God's providence should we chiefly consider ? — A. His providence towards man. Q. In what different estates is God's providence exer- cised towards man ? — A. In his primitive, his fallen, his recovered, and his eternal estate. Q. What providence did God exercise towards man in 6 62 OF THE COVENANT OF WORKS. his primitive estate ? — A. He instituted the Sabbath for his rest, appointed marriage, and put him into the garden of Eden ; and especially he entered into a covenant with him. Gen. ii. Q. What is a covenant 1 — A. It is an agreement be- tween two or more parties upon certain terms. Q. What is requisite to the making of a covenant? — A. That there be parties, a condition, and a promise ; and al- so a penalty, if any of the parties be fallible. Q. What understand you by the parties ? — A. The per- sons who make the agreement with one another. Q. What is the condition of a covenant? — A. That which, when performed, doth, according to paction, give right to claim the reward. Q,. What call you the promise of it ? — A. The engage- ment to reward the fulfilment of the condition. Q. What is the penalty 1 — A. That wliich is agreed shall be inflicted upon the breaker of the covenant. Q. Why hath God all along dealt with men by cove- nant 1 — A. To shew his own condescension, and how ready he is to bestow favours upon men ; and to encourage a willing obedience, by promising to reward it. Q. How many covenants hath God made for the eter- nal happiness of men? — A. Two ; the covenant of works, and the covenant of grace. Gal. iv. 24. Heb. viii. Q. How prove you that there are only two covenants respecting man's eternal happiness 1 — A. The scripture mentions only two such covenants ; and represents all men as under the one or the other. Gal. iv. 24 — -31. Q,. How prove you that there was a covenant made with Adam in his innocent estate? — A. In Gen. ii. 16, 17, we have all the requisites of a covenant, viz. parties, condition, and penalty, which includes the promise : and Hos. vi. 7, margin^ it is said, They^ like Adam^ transgressed the cove- nant : nor could Adam's sin be charged on his posterity, if no covenant had been made with him. Q. Was Adam, by virtue of his creation, under this cove- nant ? — A. No ; he was only under the law of God. Q. Wherein did that law, and the covenant made with him, differ "^ — A. The law made him God's servant, and required perfect obedience, without promising any reward ; but this covenant made him God's friend and ally, and promised a glorious reward to his obedience to which him- self had engaged. OF THE COVENANT OF WORKS. 63 Q. How is this covenant made with Adam ordinarily called ? — A. The covenant of works or life, the laiv or legal covenant, and the first covenant. Q. Why is it called ^Ae covenant ofworJcs? — A. Because man's good works was the condition of it. Q. Why is it called a covenant of life? — A. Because life was the reward promised for keeping it. Q. Why is it called the laio or legal covenant? — A. Be- cause it was not made between equals, but enjoined by the great Lawgiver to his subject. Q. AVhy is it called the first covenant! — A. Because, though last made^ it w^s> first made known to man. Q. W^lio were the parties in this covenant? — A. God and Adam, Gen. ii. 16, 17. Q. What moved God to enter into this covenant 1 — A. His own free favour and bounty, Job. vii. 17. Q. How doth that appear 1 — A. Because God as a Cre- ator might justly have exacted all the service man was capa- ble of, without giving him any reward ; and, notwithstand- ing, punished him for disobedience, Luke xvii. 10. Q. Was very much grace manifested in the covenant of works 1 — A. Yes, very much free favour and bounty. Q. How so 1 — A. In God's not only promising to re- ward man's obedience ; but also in so framing this cove- nant, as to admit a covenant of grace, if it was broken. Q. Why then is it not called a covenant of grace 1 — A. Because there was far less grace manifested in it than is in the second covenant, Rom. v. 20, 21. Q. How could Adam be bound by this covenant, when we never read of his consenting to the terms of it 1 A. Being made perfectly holy, he could not withhold his consent from any terms which God proposed to him. Q. For whom did Adam stand bound in this covenant 1 — A. For himself and all his natural posterity, Rom. v. Q. Who are Adam's natural posterity 1 — A. All man- kind descending from him by ordinary generation. Q. Did Adam stand bound for Christ as man 1 — A. No ; for Christ descended not from him by ordinary generation, and had not the person of a man, Isa. vii. 14. Q. How doth it appear that Adam stood bound for all his natural seed 1 — A. They are often called by his name Adam ; and his breach of covenant is charged upon them all, Rom. V. 12, 1 Cor. xv. 22. Q. Why did God make Adam to stand bound for all his (U OP THE COVENANT OP WORKS. posterity 1 — A. Because this was a shorter and safer way of securing their happiness than if each man had stood bound for himself. Q. How was it a shorter way of securing their happi- ness 1 — A. Because if Adam's obedience had been once finished, none of his posterity could have ever fallen. Q. How Avas it a safer way of securing their happiness ? — A. Adam was formed in an adult state, fully capable of perfect obedience ; and had not only a proper regard to his own happiness, but a fatherly concern for his whole natural seed, to engage him to obedience. Q. How could Adam be justly bound for persons who never chose, nor consented to his being their covenant- head 1 — A. He was the common father of them all ; and God, who is wiser than they, chose him ; and therefore they could not, without sin, have refused their consent. Q. For what was Adam bound in the covenant of works 1 — A. For performing the condition of it. Q. What was the condition of the covenant of works 1 — A. Personal and perfect obedience to God's law. Q. How was this obedience to he peisonall — A. It was to be performed by Adam himself in his own proper per- son. Gen. ii. 16, 17, Gal. iii. 12. Q. In what was Adam's obedience to be perfect? — A, In extent, degrees, and duration. Q. How was his obedience to be perfect in extent 1 — A. His whole man, soul and body, was to obey the whole of God's law. Gal. iii. 10. 12, Matth. iii. 12. Q. How was it to be perfect in degrees 1 — A. He was to love and obey the Lord with all his heart and strength. Q. How was his obedience to be perfect in duration? — A. It was to be constantly continued in till his time of trial was over. Gal. iii. 10. Q. Would Adam have ever been freed from obedience to God 1 — A. He would have been free from obedience to the law as a covenant, but never from obedience to the law as an eternal rule of righteousness, Matth. v. 48. Q. What command, besides the law of nature, did God require Adam to obey? — A. The command of not eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge, which grew in the midst of the garden of Eden, Gen. ii. 16, 17. Q. Why was this tree called the tree of knowledge of good and evil? — A. Because God thereby tried Adam's OP THE COVENANT OF WORKS. 65 obedience : and he, by eating it, knew experimentally the good which he fell from, and the evil he fell into. Q. Why did God forbid Adam to eat of this fruit ? — A. To manifest his own absolute dominion over, and interest in alJ things ; and to try whether man would obey out of regard to his mere will and authority, or not. Q. Was there no other reason against man's eating of this fruit, but merely God's forbidding it ? — A. No; the thing was quite indifferent in itself. Q. Was God's forbidding Adam to eat of this fi-uit a snare to entrap him '? — A. No ; it was, in itself, a means to secure him in holiness and happiness. Q. How did it secure him in holiness and happiness ? — A. It shewed him, that he was but a subject, and in dan- ger of falling into sin ; and that his true happiness was in God himself. Q. Would any other sin, besides eating this fruit, have broken the covenant of works ? — A. Yes, Gal. iii. 10. Q. For what was God bound in this covenant 1 — A. To fulfil the promise, if man kept it ; and to execute the threat- ening, if he should break it. Q. What was promised to man in this covenant? — A. Life temporal, spiritual and eternal, Gal. iii. 12. Q. What was this temporal life 1 — A. The happy union and communion of soul and body in this world. Q. Wherein did that spiritual life consist ] — A. In union to, and perfect fellowship with God in this world. Q. Wherein doth eternal life consist? — A. In the full en- joyment of God in heaven for ever, Psal. xvi. 11. Q. How could temporal and spiritual life be promised to Adam when he had it already 1 — A. The continuance of this life was promised to him while he did his duty, and the bestowing of it promised to his seed. Q. How prove you that eternal life was promised in the covenant of works? — A. Because eternal death was includ- ed in the threatening : and Christ shews that according to the law of works, men would enter into eternal life by keep- ing the commandments, Matth. xix. 16, 17. Q. What was the penalty of the covenant of works ? — A. Death legal, or being laid under a sentence of condem- nation ; and death real, which includes death temporal, spiritual and eternal, Rom. v. 12, and vi. 23. Q. What is that temporal death X — A. The wrathful sepa- G* 66 OF THE COVENANT OF WORKS. ration of the soul from the body, with mucli sorrow and trouble, wliile united together in this world. Q. What is death spiritual 1 — A. An accursed separa- tion of the soul from God, and loss of his favour and image. Q. What is death eternal ? — A. The accursed separa- tion of the whole man from God, and lying under his wrath in hell for ever, Matth. xxv. 46. Q. Did Adam die that very day in which he ate the forbidden fruit t. — A. He died spiritually that very moment, and fell under the sentence of temporal and eternal death. Q. Why was his natural and eternal death suspended 1 — A. That the seed whom he represented might be born, and many of the human race saved by the covenant of grace. Q. Would Adam's sin have been punished Avith death, though no covenant had been made with him ? — A. Yes ; the law of nature being connected with God's vindictive justice, requires that every sin be punished with eternal death, Rom. vi. 23, Psalm xi. 6, 7. Q. Did then his obedience in itself deserve any reward 1 — A. No; man in his best estate is but vanity. Q. By what charter then had man his happiness se- cured ] — A. Only by the promise of the covenant of works. Q. By what sacramental seal was this promise to be con- firmed 1— A. By the tree of life. Gen. iii. 22. Q. How was this a sacramental seal? — A. The eating of its fruit was a pledge of eternal life. Q. In what manner did this fruit seal that promise 1 — A. Only conditionally, if Adam continued in perfect obedi- ence till his time of trial was over. Gal. iii. 10. Q. If Adam had perfectly fulfilled the condition of this covenant, what title would he have had to the reward 1 — A. A mere pactional title, secured by the promise of God. Q. Why might not Adam's obedience have strictly me- rited or deserved a reward from Godl — A. Because he owed it wholly to God as the author of his being; and when he had done all, he would have been an unprofitable ser- vant, Luke xvii. 10, Job xxii. 3. Q. Was the obtaining of the reward to be Adam's chief end or motive in his obedience 1 — A. No ; but the glory of God, Prov. xvi. 4, 1 Cor. x. 31, Isa. xliii. 21. Q. Is the covenant of works still binding 1 — A. Yes ; it is still binding upon all that are out of Christ. Q. Doth not man's breach of it disannul its binding OF man's fall. 67 force 1 — A. No ; it still continues to demand perfect obedi- ence, and has a new claim of injinite satisfaction for offences committed. Gal. iii. 10. 12, Heb. ix. 22. Q. Doth not Christ by his obedience and suifering, or believers by receiving that as their righteousness, injure or destroy this covenant? — A. No; they fulfil, estabhsh, and exalt it, Rom. x. 4 — iii. 31. Gt. 13. Did our first jycirents continue in the estate wherein they were created 7 A. Our first parents being left to the freedom of their own will, fell from the estate wherein they were created, by sinning against God. Q. Did the making of the covenant of works with Adam infallibly secure him in the favour of God? — A. No ; it left him in a state of probation. Q. What mean you by Adam's estate of probation 1 — A. His being left to the freedom of his own will, and having it in his power to lose or gain happiness. Q. Is any man since the fall properly in a state of pro- bation or trial 1 — A. No. Q. How prove you that believers are not in such a state of trial ? — A. Because their happy estate is infallibly se- cured in Christ, Rom. viii. 1, Jude 1, 1 Pet. i. 5. Q. How then are believers' good works rewarded 1 — A . That reward is entirely of free grace, Rom. v. Q. How prove you that unbelievers are not in such a state of trial 1 — A. Because they have destroyed themselves, and can do nothing for their own relief, Eph. ii. 1. Rom. viii. 8. Q. How then are unbelievers punished for their sm 1 — A. Because though in our fallen estate sin is our necessary plague, yet we make it the object of our choice and de- light, Rom. iii. 12. 15. Q. What understand you by freedom of will ? — A. A power to act or not to act, to choose or refuse, without force from any other, Deut. xxx. 19. Q. How many kinds of freedom of will are there ? — A. Three ; fi-eedom only to good ; freedom only to evil ; and freedom to do both good and evil. Q. Whose will is freely inchned only to good ? — A. The will of God is necessarily inclined to good ; and the will of holy angels and glorified saints is infallibh/ determined to good, by the will of God, Zeph. iii. 6. Rev. xxi. 27. 68 OF man's fall. Q. Whose will is free only to evil 1 — A. The will of devils and unregenerate men, Rom. viii. 7, 8. Q. What freedom of will have believers in this world ? — A. Their new nature is free only to good, and their old na- ture free only to evil, Rom. vii. 14. 24. Q. Whose will was free both to good and evil ? — A. The will of Adam before the fall, Eccl. vii. 29. Q. Was Adam's will then equally inclined to good and evil 1 — A. No; it was inclined only to good. Gen. i. 27. Q. How was his will free to do evil ] — A. Its inclination to good was not confirmed. Q. Why might not God have made man by nature im- mutably good 1 — A. Because immutable goodness is con- trary to the very nature of a creature, Mai. i. 6. Q. Why might not God have confirmed Adam's will, that he could not have biassed it to eviH — A. Because that would have been inconsistent with his estate of probation, and the nature of the covenant made with him. Q. How so] — A. that covenant required, that Adam's right improvement of his original righteousness should be the condition of his confirmation in holiness and happiness, Rom. X. 5. Gal. iii. 12. Q. Did God give Adam full ability to keep this cove- nant 1 — A. Yes ; he made him upright^ and wrote his most perfect law in his heart, Eccl. vii. 29. Q. How long did God continue this ability with Adam % — A. Till Adam, by abusing the fredom of his will, did forfeit it. Gen. iii. 6. Psal. xlix. 12. Q. Did God any way influence Adam to abuse the free- dom of his wiin — A. No, not in the least. Jam. i. 13. Q. What then is meant by God's leaving man to the freedom of his own wilH — A. His withholding that further grace which would have confirmed him in holiness. Q. How did Adam abuse the freedom of his will? — A. By sinning against God, Gen. ii. 6. 12. a 14. What is sin ? A. Sin is any want of conformity unto, or transgres- sion of, the law of God. Q. How do you prove that there is any sin in the world 1 — A. The scriptures, our consciences, and the outward calamities of hfe, clearly prove it. OP SIN IN GENERAL. 69 Q. How doth the scripture prove it? — A. It declares that all men have sinned^ Rom. iii. 10. 23. Q. How does our conscience prove it? — A. By often filhng us with shame and dread of God's vengeance when we break his law, Gen. iii. and iv. Rom. ii. 14. Q. How do the outward calamities of life prove it ? — A. An infinitely good God would not afflict the work of his hands, if he was not offended by sin. Lam. iii. 33. Q. By what rule and standard must we judge of the sin- fulness of qualities and actions? — A. By the law of God. Q,. Can irrational creatures, who are under no law, sin? — A. No; where no law is there is no transgression. Q. How many ways do irrational creatures sin? — A. By want of conformity to, or transgression of God's law. Q. What mean you by want of conformity to God's law? — A. Our not having that purity of heart, and holiness of life, the law requires. Rom. vii. 14. Isa. Ixiv. 6. Q,. What mean you by transgression of God's law ? — A. The doing what it forbids, 1 John iii. 4. Isa. lix. 13. Q. W liy is it called transgression of the law ? — A. Be- cause hereby we pass over the limits which God hath fix- ed for our conduct in his law% Ezek. xx. Dan. ix. Q. How many things are considerable in every sin? — A. Four ; its filth, demerit, guilt, and strength. Q. What is the filth of sin ? — A. Its contrariety to the holiness of God's nature and law, by which it renders the sinner ugly and abominable in his sight, Hab. i. 13 Q. What is the demerit of sin; — A. Its deserving in- finite wrath at the hand of God, Isa. iii. 11. Q. Can the demerit and filth of sin ever be separated ? — A. No ; the wages of sin is death, Rom. vi. 23. Q. What is the guilt of sin ?— A. The chargeableness of it, in order to punishing one for it. Q. Are the filth and guilt of sin naturally connected ? — A. Yes; every blot of sin naturally binds over to wrath, Ezek. xviii. 4. Rom. ii. 8, 9. and iii. 19, 20. Q. Whence doth that proceed? — A. From the justice of God, and sentence of his law^, Psal. xi. 6, 7. Gal. in. 10. Q. Can the free grace of God separate the filth and guilt of sin ? — A. Yes, with respect to the persons on whom they are found, Rom. viii. 1. 2 Cor. v. 21. Q. Who ever had guilt lying on him without being pol- luted? — A. Christ, when our sins were laid on him. 70 OF SIN IN GENERAL. Q. Who are polluted with sin's filth, without being bound over to punishment 1 — A. Believers, Rom. viii. 1. Q. How was lliis separation of sin's tilth and guilt ef- fected'? — A. Christ and his elect behig made one in law, all their guilt was laid over on him, Isa. hii. 4, 5, 6. Q. For what end was this separation made? — A. For the speedy and full destruction of sin. Q. How is sin destroyed by this means'? — A. In order of nature Christ taketh away the guilt of sin by his satis- faction of his own person and then by his Spirit purgeth away its filth in us, Dan. ix. 24. 1 Cor. vi. 11. Q. What is the strength of sin? — A. Though sin, in respect of its guilt, hath a condemning strength ; yet the strength of sin most properly consists in that mighty force which our indwelling lusts have to push us on to actual transgressions, notwithstanding great opposition from con- science, and the Spirit, word, and providence of God. Q. To what issue doth this activity of sin tend? — A. To fix and brino- forth more sin, and increase our bondage to it, Rom. vii. Psalm Ixxxi. 12. Q. What is the principal means of the strength of sin? — A. The pure and holy law of God, 1 Cor. xv. 56. Q. How can the law be the means of sin's defiling strength? — A. Sin is irritated, and occasionally stirred up by its precepts ; but especially its curse fixes sinners under the dominion of sin, as the principal branch of their pun- ishment, Rom. vii. 5. 8 — 13, 1 Cor. xv. 56. Q,. 15. What was the sin whereby our first parents fell from the estate wherein they luere created! A. The sm whereby our first parents fell from the estate wherein they were created, was their eating the forbidden fruit. Q. What was the cause of Adam's abusing his freedom of will ? — A. The temptation of Satan, 2 Cor. xi. 3. Q. Whom call you Sataii 1 — A. The prince of fallen angels or devils, Matth. xxv. 41, Rev. xx. 2. Q. When did Satan tempt our first parents? — A. Soon after they were created, and perhaps that very same day. Q. Why did the devil tempt them so soon ? — A. He is full of malice, set upon mischief, and will lose no opportu- nities of committing it, 1 Pet. i. 8, Job i. and ii. OF man's first SIN". 71 Q. What moved Satan to tempt man 1 — A. His enmity against God, and envy at man's happiness. Q. Whether did he first tempt the man or the woman ? — . A. The woman in her husband's absence, Gen. iii. 2. Q. Why so ? — A. Because she was the weaker vessel. Q. By what instrument did Satan tempt the woman 1 — A. By a serpent, Gen. iii. 1, 2 Cor. xi. 3. Q. Why made he use of a serpent as his instrument'? — A. Because the serpent being naturally subtile, and per- haps beautiful, the woman might not suspect any thing un- common in its speech, 2 Cor. xi. 3, Gen. iii. 1. Q. To what did Satan tempt our first parents 1 — A. To eat of the forbidden fruit. Gen. iii. 1 — 5. Q. How did he tempt him to eat of this fruit 1 — A. He suggested that there was reason to question God's com- mand ; and promised safety and advantage in eating it, Gen. iii. Q. What advantage did he promise to them in eating this fruit ] — A. He said they would be as Gods, knowing good and evil. Gen. iii. 5. Q. How did he confirm this false promise of advantage? — A. By declaring that God knew the truth of what he said, Gen. iii. 5. Q. What success had the devil in this temptation 1 — A. The woman coveted, took, and ate of this fruit ; and gave to her husband also, and he did eat, Gen. iii. 6. Q. Was the eating of this fruit a great sin 1 — A. Yes ; for it broke all the commandments of God, and was attend- ed with many grievous aggravations. Q. How did our first parents eating the forbidden fruit break the first commandment? — A. By unthankfulness, and unbelief, in distrusting and discrediting God, and believ- ing the devil; by making a god of their belly ; and by pride, in seeking to render themselves as wise as God. Q. How did it break the second commandment 1 — A. God's ordinance of abstaining from that fruit was not ob- served, and kept pure and entire. Gen. ii. 17. Q. How did it break the third commandment 1 — A. God's attributes were hereby profaned ; his truth called a liar, his majesty and holiness affronted, his power and justice con- temned, and Satan's profane appeal to him approved, Gen. iii. 5, 6. Q. How did this sin break the fourth commandment ? — 72 OF OUR FALL IN ADAM. A. It corrupted all the powers of their nature, and rendered them incapable to keep holy the Sabbath. Q. How did this sin break the fifth commandment? — A. The wife tempted her husband to sin, and he, by yielding, encouraged her in wickedness ; both rebelled against their only parent, God, and squandered away the eternal happi- ness of their children whicli was intrusted to them. Q. How did the eating of this fruit break the sixth com- mandment? — A. Hereby our first parents murdered them- selves and all their posterity, soul and body, Rom. v. 12. Q. How did it break the seventh commandment? — A. The luxurious desire of this fruit begot in our first parents every unclean lust, Gen. iii. 6. Matth. xv. 19. Q. How did it break the eighth commandment? — A. It was a sacrilegious theft and robbery of what was the sole property of God, Gen. iii. 11. Q. How did it break the ninth commandment? — A. The eating of tliis fruit, to render tliemselves happy, falsely witnessed that God had envied their happiness ; and brought the infamous character of covenant-breakers upon them- selves aud all their posterity. Gen. iii. 1. 4, 5. Q. How did it break the tenth commandment ? — A. They were discontent with their lot, and coveted that whicli God had'denied to them. Gen. iii. 6 — 11. Q. How was this sin of eating the forbidden fruit highly aggravated V — A. It was committed upon a small tempta- tion ; by a man lately made after the image of God, and endued with sufficient strength to resist temptations, ex- pressly warned to avoid this sin, and honourably admitted into covenant with God; and in Paradise, where he had great abundance of pleasant fruits and other delights, Gen. i. ii. and iii. Q. Wherein did man's sin first begin? — A, In Eve's listening to Satan as a teacher. Gen. iii. I — 6. Q. What should this teach us ? — A. To resist the first motions of lust and temptation ; and to go out against them only in the strength of Christ, Eph, vi. Q. Did this sin of eating the forbidden fruit deserve the temporal, spiritual, and eternal death of Adam, and all his natural seed? — A. Yes; being infinitely evil, it well deserved infinite punishment, Rom. vi. 23. Q. What makes sin infinitely evil? — A. Its being com- mitted against an infinitely great an4 holy God, Isa. lix, 13, OF man's fallen estate. 73 Q. 16. Did all mankind fall in Adam^ s first trans- gression 7 A. The covenant being made with Adam, not only for himself, but for his posterity, all mankind, de- scending from him by ordinary generation, sinned in him, and fell with him, in his first transgression. Q. What was the effect of Adam's eating the forbidden fruit ?_A. He fell by it, Rom. v. 12. 19. I Cor. v. 22. Q. Who fell with him ? — A. All his natural posterity. Q. Why fell they with him ] — A. Because they sinned in him in his first transgression, Rom. v. 12 — 19. Q. How were they iw him v/hen he sinned? — A. As their natural parent, and as their covenant head. Q. If Adam had stood, would all his natural posterity have stood with him ? — A. Yes, Rom. v. 12. Q. Whether would Adam's obedience, or their own, have found their legal claim to eternal lifel — A. Adam's obedience ; and their own obedience to the law as a rule, would have been part of their happiness. Q. Why did not Christ as a man, being a son of Adam, fall with him? — ^A. Christ was none of Adam's natural seed, descending from him by ordinary generation, nor re- presented by him as his covenant head, Isa, vii. 14. Q. Wherein did the first Adam, and Christ the second Adam, agree? — A. Both represented men in a covenant with God, Rom. V. 12—19. 1 Cor. xv. 22. 45. Q. AVherein did the first and second Adam differ? — A. In dignity of persons, the covenant tliey pertained to, and number and nature of those whom they represented. Q. How did they difl'er in dignity of person ? — A. The first Adam was a living soul, a mere man, and fallable creature ; but the second Adam is a quickening head, a God- man, eternal, almighty, and unchangeable, 1 Cor. xv. 21, 22. 45. 47. Q. How do they differ in the covenant to which they pertain? — A. Adam was representative in the covenant of works ; but Christ is representative in the covenant of grace. Q. How do they differ in the number they represented ? — A. Adam represented all mere men ; Christ represents only elect men, Rom. v. 12. 19. Q. How do they differ as to the condition of those whom they represented? — A. Adam engaged only for innocent persons; Christ engaged for dead and guilty sinners, Isa. liii. 6. ? 74 OF man's SfVFULNESS Q. 17. liitoioliat estate did the fall bring inank'indl A. The fall brought mankind into an estate of sin and misery. Q. Why is man's apostacy from God called the fall 1 — A. Because man is debased, bruised, and ruined by it. Q. From what have all mankind fallen in Adam? — \, From a state of perfect holiness and happiness. Q. Into what have they fallen 1 — A . Into an estate of sin and misery, Eph ii. 1 — 3, Rom. v. 12 — 19. Q. Why is man's fallen condition called an estate of sin and misery? — A. Because sin and misery abound with him, and he fixed in both, Zech. ix. 11. Q. How are men fixed in actual sins 1 — A. The guilt and stain which they leave behind tliem is abiding. Q. What fixeth man in this state of sin and misery 1 — A. The threatenini^ of the broken covenant of works, and the nature of sin, Gal. iii. 10, Epli. ii. 1. Q. How doth the threatening of the broken covenant of works fix men in an estate of sin and misery ? — A. It en- gagetli the justice of God to lay them under the threefold death threatened in that covenant, Ezek. xviii. 4. Q. How doth the nature of sin fix men in that estate 1 — A. Wherever it reigns, it renders the person altogether in- capable of delivering himself, and unwilling to be delivered by another, Rom. viii. 7, Eph. ii. 1, 2. Q. How is our fallen estate described in scripture 1 — A, As a state of distance from God, of condemnation, pollution, bondage, darkness, and death, Eph. ii. 12. Q. Whether is our sin or our jnisery worst I — A. Sin •; for it immediately strikes against God, and is the cause of misery ; whereas miseiy only strikes against sinners. Q. Is not sin a misery to man, as well as an offence to God ? — A. Yes ; to be under the reigning power of sin is the greatest misery, Eph. ii. 1 — 4. 12. Q,. 18. Wherein consists the sinfulness of that es- tate whercinto Tiian fell? A. The sinfulness of that estate whereinto man fell, consists in the guilt of Adam's first sin, the want of original righteousness, and the corruption of his whole nature, which is commonly called ori- ginal sin, together with all actual transgressions which proceed from it. OF man's sinfulness. 75 Q. How many kinds of sin are there among men 1 — A. Two; original and actual, Matth. xv. 19. Q. In what do these differ ] — A. Original sin is the sin of our natures, and actual is the sin of our lives. Q. What is original sin 1 — A. The sin which is con- veyed to us by our parents from Adam, Rom. v., Psal. li. Q. Why is this called original sin? — A. Because we have it from our conception and birth ; and it is the foun- tain of all our actual sin, Psal. li. 5, Matth. xv. 19. Q. Of how many parts doth original sin consist? — A. Of three ; the guilt of Adam's first sin, the want of origi- nal righteousness, and the corruption of the whole nature ; the first is called orignal sin imputed, and the two last origi- nal sin inherent. Q. Of what sin of Adam's are we guilty ? — A. Only his first sin ; for he committed it only as our covenant-head and representative, Rom. v. 26. Q. How are we reckoned guilty of Adam's first sin 1 — A. By God's imputing it to us, or his accounting it ours in law, Rom. v. 12. 19, 1 Cor. xv. 22. Q. Why is it in law accounted our sin 1 — A. Adam, our representative, is one witli us in the eye of the law. Q. How prove you that Adam's first sin is imputed to his posterity? — A. The scripture declares that by one manh disobedience many zvere made sinners, Rom. v. 12. 19. Q. Doth the justice of God require the imputation of Adam's first sin to his posterity? — A. Yes ; as well as the imputation of Christ's righteousness to behevers. Q. Why are not Adam's other sins, as well as his first, imputed to us? — A. Because after he had broken the cove- nant of works by his first sin, he ceased to be our covenant- head, having become unfit for that station. Q. How then did the broken covenant of works bind mankind after the fall ? — A. Every man stood bound for himself, Gal. iii. 10. 12. Q. What is the second part of original sin ? — A. The want of original righteousness, Psal. xiv. 1, 2, 3. Q. What do you understand by original righteousness ? — A. That spiritual knowledge, righteousness, and holiness with which man was created, Eccl. vii. 29, Col. iii. 9. Q. How do you prove that we naturally want this origi- nal righteousness? — A. The scripture alfirms that there is no man righteous, no not one, Rom. iii. 10, 11, Isaiah Ixiv. 6. 76 OF man's sinfulness. Q. Why doth God witliliold this original righteousness when lie createth our souls ? — A. He as a righteous Judge withholds it as the punishment of Adam's first sin imputed to us, Isa. lix. 2, Rom. iii. 23. Q. Why might not God create our souls holy under that guilt? — A. Because the guilt of Adam's first sin necessa- rily suhjects us to the punishment of spiritual death. Q. Why might not God have left them uncreated, rather than form them without original righteousness? — A. Be- sides other reasons, men must be brought into being, either to be saved by Christ, or to beget, or be useful to such as shall be saved, Isa. liii. 10 — 12. Q. Doth God then make any man from an inclination to damn him ? — A. No ; God makes all things for his own glory; and when man will not glorify God by obedience, it is necessary that God glorify himself in man's punishment, Prov. xvi. 4, Psalm xi. 6, 7, Rom. xi. 36. Q. How prove you that the want of original righteous- ness is a sin ? — A. It is a want of conformity to God's law. Q. Under' what penalty doth God's law demand original righteousness ? — A. Under the penalty of his eternal wrath, Gal. iii. 10, Ezek. xviii. 4. Q. Is it not hard that God's law should so demand origi- nal righteousness, when men cannot afford it 1 — A. No ; for man lost it by his own fault, Rom. iii. 23. Q. What is the third branch of man's original sin 1 — A. The corruption of our whole nature, Isa. i. 5, 6. Q. What do you understand by the corruption of na- ture ? — A. It is that whereby all the powers of our soul, and members of our body, are indisposed to good, and defiled with, and disposed to evil, Isa. Ixiv. 6, and i. 6. Q. Whence do ye prove that men's nature is originally corrupted 1 — A. From scripture and experience. Q. How doth scripture prove it? — A. It declares that be- ing brought out of unclean things, we must be unclean ; that of Jlesh we are born Jlcsh ; that we are begotten in the im- age of fallen Adam, and are shapen and conceived in sm, and b?/ nature the children of wrath, Job xiv. 4, John iii. 6, Gen. V. 3, Psalm li. 5, Eph. ii. 3. Q. How doth experience proveour natures to be corrupt- ed ? — A. The flood of miseries upon infants, our universal and early inclinations to evil, and their breaking forth in opposition to tlie severest laws of God and men ; and even to the strongest resolutions, and largest measures of grace OF man's sinfulness. 77 nere, and our natural readiness to imitate Adam in his first sin, shew that our nature is corrupted. Q. Wherein do we naturally imitate Adam in his first sin 1 — A. In our being more curious to know new things, than to practise known duty ; in our bias to evil because forbidden ; in our inclination to hear what is vain or wicked; and easy following of evil counsel rather than good. Q. In what other things do we imitate Adam's sinful con- duct ] — A. In our anxious care for what is pleasant to our eyes, or other senses, at the expense of our souls ; in our discontentment with our lot ; and hiding, excusing, exten- uating, or laying the blame of our sin upon others, &c., Ezek. xvi. XX. xxiii,, Isa. lix. Q. What about every man is corrupted with sin 1 — A. His whole man, soul and body, Isa. i. 6, Jer. xvii. 9. Q. In what is our soul naturally corrupted 1 — A. In its understanding, will, conscience, affections, and memory, Isa. i. 6, Psal. xiv., Jer. xvii. 9. Q. With what is our understanding or mind corrupted 1 — A, With ignorance of, and opposition to spiritual truths ; and with proneness to vanity, pride, and lies. Q,. Of what things is our mind naturally ignorant 2 — A. Of God, of Christ, and the way of salvation ; and of the wickedness of our own heart and life, and our danger on account of ft, Isa. i. 3, Eph. iv. 18. Q. Wherein doth the darkness, blindness, and ignorance of men's minds appear ? — A. Few have sound notions of divine truths, and fewer the saving knowledge of them ; but the most part, even of such as have gospel light, are like blind men daily stumbling into sin, John i. 5. Q. How doth the natural opposition of our mind to di- vine truths appear ? — A. In the difficulty there is to teach many the principles of religion, who quickly learn other things ; and in men's frequent apostacy from the truth, or hving in such a manner as shews they do not believe what they know, Isa. xxviii. 9, 10. Q. How doth the natural vanity of our mind appear ? — A. In our early and general delight in folly, and in our thinking on vain notions or projects, especially when we are engaged in the worship of God, Prov. xxii. 15. Q. How doth the natural pride of man's mind appear 1 — A. In men's fondness of what makes them appear great or gay ; and in their self-conceit, and unwillingness to believe what they really are, especially before God. 78 OF man's sinfulness. Q. Wherein doth the natural jDroiieiiess of our mind to lies and falsehood appear 1 — A. In our early and artfully devising- lies ; and loving to read, hear, or think of ro- mances and fables, rather than the truths of God. Q. How is our conscience naturally corrupted "? — A. It is so blind as not duly to perceive God's challenges and commands ; and is easily bribed by carnal advantage, to call good evil, and evil good, 1 Tim. iv. 2. Q. With what is our will naturally corrupted 1 — A. With a bias to every thing sinful, enmity against every thing good, and a perverseness with respect to our chief end, Rom. vii. 19, and viii. 7. Q. In what dotli our natural bias, or strong inclination to evil appear? — A. In our early going astray from the path of duty ; in the sudden expiry of our good motions and resolutions ; and in the faint and imperfect religious service of believers themselves, Psal. Iviii. 3. Q. Wherein doth our natural averseness and enmity against that which is good appear ? — A. In the froward- ness of children ; the backwardness of our hearts to re- ligious, and especially more secret and spiritual duties ; and our frequent sinning over the belly of our convictions and conscience, Deut. xxix. 19, Heb. x. 26. 29. Q. To what is our will naturally an enemy 1 — A. To God, to Christ, and the Holy Spirit. Q. To what of God is our will naturally an enemy "? — To his being, perfections, word, worship, &.c. Q. How doth men's natural enmity against the being and perfections of God appear 1 — A. In their secret wish- ing that there were no God to give laws, or to punish for sin ; and in their profaning and accusing his name when in passion, and often deliberately, without any provocation. Q. How doth our natural enmity against the word of God appear ? — A. In our perverting and opposing it ; and improving its laws as irritations, and the gospel as an en- couragement to sin, Jude 4, Gal. i. 7, 8. Q. How doth our natural enmity against tlie worship of God appear 1 — A. In our universal and early inclination to shift it, or to disturb others in it ; and in our encouraging drowsiness, vain and unseasonable thoughts, when we are engaged in it, 1 Sam. xxi. 7, Mai. i. 13. Q. To what of Christ as Mediator is our will naturally an enemy 1 — A. To all of Christ, particularly his offices of prophet, priest, and king, 1 Cor. i. 23. OF man's sinfulness. 79 Q. How doth our enmity against the prophetical office of Christ appear ? — A. In our conceit of our own wisdom, however brutish we be ; and in our shifting and despising the instructions of Christ, 1 Cor. i. 23, Ileb. iii. 10. Q. Wherein doth our natural enmity against the priestly office of Christ appear? — A. In our high esteem of our ov/n righteousness, and seeking salvation by it in whole or in part ; in men's strong opposition to the doctrine of God's free grace, and refusing to receive Christ as their only righteousness ; and frequent rushing themselves upon eter- nal damnation, rather than be saved by him alone ^ Rom. x. 3, and ix. 31, 32. Q. Wherein doth our natural enmity against Clirist's kingly office appear'? — A. In our readiness to model his ordinances to our own taste, to rebel against his laws, and to censure or oppose the discipline of his church. Q. Against which of Christ's offices liave we the most open enmity? — A. Against his kingly office, Psal. ii. 1, 2. Q. Against which of Christ's offices have v/e the strong- est secret enmity 1 — A. Against his priestly office. Q. How doth that appear ? — A. In our frequent resting in duties when we will not omit them, Rom. x. 3. Q. Why have we the strongest enmity against the priestly office of Christ? — A. It is no way discovered by the light of our natural conscience ; it most clearly dis- plays the glory of God, and the vileness of our own righte- ousness ; and is the foundation of the other two offices. Q. Do not many desire salvation by Christ as a priest, who refuse obedience to him as a king? — A. The salva- tion which such desire is not the salvation of Christ, but a salvation in sin, and through their own good works. Q. Wherein lieth the evil of desiring such a salvation 1 — A. It chiefly dishonours God, and debaseth the priestly office of Christ, by attempting to render it needless, nay, the strongest encouragement to sin, Jude 4. Q. How doth our natural enmity against the Spirit of God appear ? — A. In our violent resistance of his kind mo- tions and operations on our heart and conscience, before or after conversion. Acts vii. 51, Heb. x. 29. Q. Wherein doth our natural perverseness with respect to our chief end appear ? — A. In our making our own inte- resits, real or imaginary, our chief end, rather than the glory of God, Zech. vii. 5, Phil. ii. 21. 80 OF man's SINFLLNEJsS. Q. How are our affections naturally corrupted? — A. They are wrong placed, and in a wrong bent. Q. How are they wrong placed on God, as love, joy, &-c. are placed upon sin 1 — A. Those that should be turned against sin, are turned against God, Rom. viii. 7. Q. How are our affections naturally wrong bended 1 — A. Our right-placed affections, as love of parents, &c., are always either too strong, or too weak. Q. How is our memory naturally corrupted 1 — A. It rea- dily forgets what is good, while it firmly remembers what is wicked or trifling, Jer. ii. 32. Q. How are our bodily members corrupted with sin 1 — A . They are ready instruments of unrighteousness. Q. What are our feet swift to ? — A. To run Satan's er- rands, and mischief, Rom. ii. 15. Q. With what is our mouth naturally filled 1 — A. With cursing and bitterness, Rom. iii. 14. Q. What are our eyes most ready to behold 1 — A. Ob- jects of vanity, wickedness, and lust. Q. What are our ears most disposed to hear 1 — A. Er- ror, folly, and filthiness, Prov. xix. 27. Q. How doth it appear that original sin is very heinous? — A. From the death of so many infants ; from believers' deep grief on account of it ; and from its more lasting and extensive nature than other sins, being the fountain of all actual guilt, Exod. xh., Rom. vii. 14 — 24. Q. Doth God implant original sin inherent in us "? — A. No; it flows from original sin imputed. Q. How then is original sin conveyed to us ? — A. By natural generation ; we hemg degenerate plants of a strange vine, Psal. Ii. 5, Jer. ii. 21. Q. Do the saints, who are in part sanctified, convey as much natural corruption to their children as others 1 — A Yes ; for they beget children according to nature, not ac- cording to their grace, 1 Sam. ii. 12, and viii. 3. Q. How should parents begetting their children such mon- sters of sin, and heirs of wrath, affect them? — A. It should stir them up to cry earnestly to God for early regenerating grace to their children, and to use all appointed means for their salvation, Mark x. 14. Q. Whether do we make ourselves better or worse after our birth? — A. Much worse by our actual sin. Q. What is actual sin? — A. The sin which we daily commit in thought, word, and deed, Rom. iii. 9 — 21. OF man's sinfulness. 81 Q. How may actual sin be distinguished 1 — A. Into sins of omission and of commission. Q. What understand you by a sin of omission? — A. Our neglecting to perform what God's law requires. Q. What mean you by a sin of commission 1 — A. Our doing that which God's law forbids, Hos. iv. 2. Q What connection hath actual sin with original? — A. Original sin is the accursed root and fountain ; and actual sin tlie branches, fruit and stream, Rom. vii. Q. How may our lusts, by which our original sin work- eth towards actual, be distinguished? — A. Into the lusts of our flesh, and the lusts of our spirit, 2 Cor. vii. 1. Q. Which are the lusts of the flesh? — A. Those to which we are excited by the members of our body, as gluttony, drunkenness, uncleanness, &c. Q. Which are the lusts of the mind or spirit ? — A. Those that have their principal seat in our souls, as pride, ambition, envy, malice, &c.. Tit. iii. "S. Q. How may our lusts, in respect of our power and in- fluence, be distinguished? — A. Into subordinate and pre- dominant lusts, Heb. xii. 1, Matth. v. 29, 30. Q. Wliat is a predominant lust? — A. That which chief- ly rules over, and sways a person to sin, Heb. xii. 1. Q. Have all men, or the same men at all time-s, the same lust predominant in them ? — A. No. Q. Whence dotli that proceed ? — A. It proceeds from the different constitutions of their bodies, different ages, call- ings, opportunities, 'icked man? — A. A passage from all his joy and happiness to eternal misery. Q. What makes death terrible to a wicked man? — A. It robs him of all his beloved enjoyments, tears his souJ from his body, drags it to God's tribunal, and casts it into the prison of hell, Prov. xiv. 32. Q. What is the sting of death ? — -A. Sin. Q. How is sin the sting of death ? — A. It renders death irresistibly powerful, and infinitely agonizing and ruinous, Prov. xiv. 32. Job xviii. 7—18. Q. What is the grave to a wicked man? — A. It is a prison to retain his bodv till the judgment of the great day Rev. XX. 13. Psalm xlix. 14. 8 8() OF MAN S MISERY. Q. To what is man, by sin, liable after his death 1 — A. To the pains of hell for ever, Luke xvi. 22, 23. Q. How is hell called in Scripture 1 — A. Tophet, a prison^ a lake of fire and brimstone, a bottomless pit, utter darkness, &c. Isa. xxx. 33. Rev. xx. 3. 10. - Q. For whom was hell originally prepared 1 — A. For the devil and his angels, Malth. xxv. 41. Q. Why then are men cast into it 1 — A. They joined with the devil and his angels in rebelhon against God. Q. How may the pains or punishments of hell be distin- guished? — A. Into the punishment of loss and of sense. Q. What do those in hell lose "? — A. The enjoyment of God and Christ, the fellowship of holy angels and saints, the happiness of their soul, and every good thing. Q. How are the damned affected with this loss 1 — A. They are filled with anguish and grief. Matt. xiii. 42. Q. What is the punishment of sense in helH — A. The most terrible torments in soul and body. Q. Who torments the damned in lielH — A. God, the devil, and their own conscience. Q. How doth God torment them? — A. By making all the arrows of his wrath stick fast in them, 2 Thess. i. 9. Q. How doth Satan torment them 1 — A. His presence is a burden, and he insults them in their misery, ^fec. Q. How doth the gnawing worm of conscience torment them? — A. It presents the eternity and justice of their misery, lashes them for their former sins, and especially gospel-hearers, for refusing Christ, Mark ix. 43 — 49. Q. What are the properties of hell-torments ? — A. They are inconceivably severe, constant, and eternal. Q. How prove you that they are eternal ? — A. The scripture calls them everlasting punishment and destruc- tion. Q. Why must the punishments of the wicked be eternal ? — A. Because their sin is infinitely evil, Hab. i. 13. Q. Why might not God lay all the infinite wrath which their sins deserve upon them at once ? — A. It is impossible for creatures to bear it, and therefore it must be continued upon sinners through all eternity, Psal. xc. 1.1. Q. What attributes of God are chiefly glorified in hell- torments? — A. His holiness, justice, and power. Q. How is God's holiness glorified in hell-torments ?— A. In casting the wicked out of his gracious presence. OF THE COVENANT OF GRACE. 87 Q. How is God's justice glorified in hell-torments'? — A. Ill rendering to sinners according to their crimes. Q. How is God's power glorified in hell-torments'? — A. It upholds the damned in being with one hand, and lashes them with the other, 2 Thess. i. 8, 9. Q. What doth tins view of our misery teach us 1 — A. To i]y speedily out of our natural estate to Christ, if in it; and if delivered, to extol the Lord who plucked us as brands out of the burning, Heb. vi. 19. Zech. iii. Q,. 20. Did God leave all mankind to perish in the estate of sin and misery ? A. (iod, having out of his mere good pleasure, from all eternity, elected some to everlasting life, did enter into a covenant of grace, to deliver them out of the estate of sin and misery, and to bring them into an estate of salvation by a Redeemer. Q. What became of the angels that sinned 1 — A. God left them to perish in their sin and misery. Q,. Do any of mankind, by tlieir prayers, sincere resolu- tions, or blameless lives, deserve more pity at the hand of God than fallen angels'? — A. No ; the best works of imre- ^enerate men deserve hell; for the prayer of the wicked is an ahomination to the Lord^ and X\\qiy ploicing is sin, Prov. XV. 8. xxi. 4. and xxviii. 9. Q. Hath God then left all men to perish in their state of sin and misery 1 — A. No ; he delivers some, Zech. ix. Q,. Whom doth he deliver? — A. The elect only. Q. What m.oved God to deliver these elect men? — A. His own free love, John ill. 16, 1 Johii iv. 10. Q. Wliat moved God to deliver men rather than fallen angels ? — A. His sovereign good pleasure, Rom. ix. 16. Q. By what means doth God deliver the elect? — A. By the covenant of grace, Zech. ix. 11. Q. Might not the broken covenant of v/orks have been renewed ?^-A. No; it was a covenant of friendship, and could never reconcile enemies. Q. How is the covenant by which sinful men are deliver- ed, called?— A. The covenant of grace, of promise, peace, of reconciliation, or redemption, and the second or new covenant. Q. Wliy is it culled the covenant of grace ? — A. Because yy OF THE COAENANT OF GRACE. free grace moved God to make it ; and all the blessings thereof are freel j bestowed upon unworthy sinners. Q. What is meant hj grace ? — A. Either the undeserved love and good-will of God ; or the effects of that good-will bestowed on undeserving creatures, Rom. v. 21. Q. How is God's free grace manifested in this covenant? — A. In his freely providing and furnishing his own Son to be our Mediator, accepting his righteousness in our stead, and sending the Spirit to apply his purchase to us. Q. Why is it called a covenant of promise ? — A. Because it is dispensed to us in free promises. Q. Why is it called a covenant of peace 1 — A. Because it brings about peace and reconciliation between God and rebellious sinners, 2 Cor. v. 19. Q. Why is it called the covenant of redemption 1 — A. Be- cause thereby lost and enslaved sinners are brought back, and delivered from their bonda^je, Zech. ix. 11. Q. Is the covenant of grace, and that of redemption, one and the same covenant ? — A. Yes ; the scripture mentions only two covenants that regards man's eternal state, of which the covenant of works is one, and therefore the covenant of grace must be the other: and the blood of Christ is in scrip- ture called the blood of the covenant^ but never of the cov- enants, Gal. iv. 24. 30. Q. How do you further prove that what some call the covenant of grace made with believers, and distinct from the covenant of redemption, is no proper covenant ? — A. Because it hath no proper condition, faith being as much promised as any other blessing, Psal. ex. 3. Q. Why is the covenant of grace called the second and new covenant ? — A. Because, though it was first made, it was last executed, and is everlasting, 2 Sam. xxhi. 5. Q. Did the covenant of grace disannul the covenant of works ? — A. No ; it honoured and established it. Q. How did it honour and estabhsh it 1 — A. As the con- dition of the broken covenant of v/orks was made the con- dition of the covenant of grace. Gal. iii. 10, and iv. 21. Q. What was the condition of the broken covenant of works 1 — A. Perfect obedience to its precepts, and suffering the infinite wrath contained in its penalty. Q. Why was the condition of the broken covenant of works made the condition of the covenant of grace ? — A. Because God's holiness, justice and truth, were concerned in the honour of the broken covenant of works. OF THE COVENANT OF GRACE. 89 Q. How were God's holiness and justice concerned in the honour of the covenant of works'? — A. They required that the breaker of so just and holy a law should be ex- posed to infinite wrath, Psal. xi. 6, 7, Ezek. xviii. 4. Q. How was his truth concerned ? — A. It had engaged that the breaker of the precept should surely die. Q. How many things are in general considered with re- spect to tlie covenant of grace? — A. Two; the makmg, and the administration of it. Q. Is the making of it the same which some divines call the covenant of redemption 1 — A. Yes, Psal. Ixxxix. 3. Q. Is the administration of it, which some call the cove- nant of grace, made with believers 1 — A. Yes. Q. Why was the covenant of grace made from all eter- nity] — A. Because of God's eternal and infinite love to elect sinners, Jer. xxxi. 3, 1 John iv. 9, 10. 16. 19. Q. Who are the parties in the covenant of grace? — A. God and Christ, Psalm Ixxxix. 3, Zech. vi. 13. Q. Whether did God, essentially considered, or the per- son of the Father, make this covenant with Christ ? — A. God essentially considered in the person of the Father. Q. Under what view doth God appear in the making of this covenant 1 — A. As most high, holy, and just ; offend- ed with sin, and yet most merciful to sinners. Q. How prove you that the covenant of grace was made with Christ 1 — A. The scripture affirms it ; and he is call- ed the covenant himself, Psalm Ixxxix. 3, Isa. xliii. 6. Q,. Why is Christ called the covenant itself? — A. He is the matter of it, and stands in manifold relations to it. Q. In what relations doth Christ stand to the covenant of grace, as to the making of it ? — A. He is the surety, and sacrificing priest of the covenant, Heb. vii. Q. In what relations doth he stand with respect to the administration of the covenant ? — A. He is the trustee ; tes- tator, prophet, interceding priest, and king of the cove- nant, Col. i. 19. Heb. ix. 16, &c. Q. In what relations doth he stand with respect to both the making and administration of the covenant ? — A. In the relation of mediator and Redeemer, Heb. ix. 15. Q. Did Christ in this covenant stand bound for himself? — A. Not for himself, but only for others, Isa. liii. 4. Q. What was the necessity that this covenant should be made with a representative? — A. The persons chosen to salvation could do nothing for themselves, Eph. ii. 1 — 5. 8* 90 OF THE COVExNAXT OF GRACE. Q,. How do you prove that Christ represented others hi this covenant 1 — A. Because to him the promises thereof were first made ; and he is called the Surety of it. Q. What is in general meant by a Surety 1 — A. One who engageth to pay debt, or perform duty, in the stead of another ; or to secure the other's paying or performing it himself, Prov. xxii. 26. and xx. 26. Q. What for a Surety is Christ? — A. One who engag- eth to pay all the elect's debt to God himself. Q. What debt did the elect owe to God 1 — A. Perfect obedience to his law, and infinite satisfaction for sin to his justice, Gal. in. 10. 12. Matth. in. 15. Q. Is Christ surety for his people's faith and repent- ance 1 — A. No ; for Christ's suretiship belongs to the con- dition of the covenant ; whereas his people's faith and re- pentance belong to the promise of it. Psalm xxii. Q. Is Christ properly a Surety for God's performing the promises to usl — A. No: though Christ as a prophet at- test the promises, yet the all-sufliciency and unchangeable- ness of God exclude any surety for him. Q. Why is the covenant of grace made witli such an in- finitely strong Surety? — A. That he might not fail in per- forming its infinitely high condition, Isa. xhi. 4. Q. In what manner did Christ engage in this covenant? — A. With full knowledge of his undertaking, and yet with the utmost cheerfulness and resolution, Jer. xxx. 21. Q. Wliom did Christ represent or stand bound for in the covenant of grace ? — A. The elect only ; for they only bear his name and image ; they only are called his seed ; and they only partake of the saving blessings of his covenant, 1 Cor. XV. Rom. v. and ix. Eph. i. 1 Pet. i. 2. Q. Why are the elect called Christ's seedl — A. Because in regeneration he begets them again by his word and Spi- rit, 1 Pet. i. 3. 23. James i. 18. Q. Why is Christ said to take hold of the seed of Abra- ham^ and not of the seed of Adam ? — A. To show that he represented only a part of Adam's seed, Heb. ii. 16. Q. Is it any dishonour to Christ to represent a lesser number than Adam ? — A. No ; for Christ had infinitely more to do for the salvation of one sinner, than Adam had to do for the happiness of innocent mankind. Q. How are the elect considered in the making of this covenant ? — A. As lost sinners, wholly unable to help them- OF THE COVENANT OF GRACE. 91 selves, and yet as objects of the free and sovereign will of God, 1 John iv. 9, 10. 19. John iii. 16. Q. Wherein doth the freedom of this love appear? — A. In pitching upon objects altogether unlovely. Q. In what doth the sovereignty of the Father's love appear 1 — A. In choosing some, while others no worse are left to perish in their sin, Rom. ix. 22. Q. How did God make this covenant with Christ ? — A. He proposed to him the persons to be saved, together with the parts of the covenant ; and Christ accepted of them, Zech. vi. 13. John ^vii. 6. Q. What are the parts of the covenant of grace '( — A. The condition, and the promise of it. Q. How can this covenant have a condition, when it is a covenant of grace 1 — A. Though it be absolutely of free grace to the elect, yet it is strictly conditional to Christ, Matth. iii. 15, Isa. hii. 10, 11, 12. Q. What is the condition of the covenant of grace 1 — A. Christ's Surety-righteousness, Dan. ix. 24, Rom. v. 19. Q. What do you mean by the righteousness of Christ? — A. The hohness of his human nature, the righteousness of his life, and his satisfactory death, Phil. ii. 8. Q. Why was satisfaction required from Christ, when it was not required from Adam as our public head ? — A. Be- cause Adam engaged only for an innocent seed ; but Christ engaged for guilty sinners, Rom. v. 12 — 19. Q. Why was the perfect holiness of Christ's human na- ture necessary] — A. To answer for the original righteous- ness demanded of us by the law of God, Rom. v. 19. Q. Why was his righteousness of life necessary? — A. To answer for that perfect righteousness of life demanded from us by the law, Rom. x. 4, Matth. xix. 17. Q. Why was his satisfactory death necessary 1 — A. To atone and satisfy the justice of God for our sin. Q. For what was Christ to satisfy the justice of God? — A. For all the sins of an elect world, Isa. liii. 4, 5, 6. Q. How was he to make satisfaction ? — A. By suffering the very same infinite punishment which we deserved. Q. How prove you that Christ fulfilled the whole con- dition of the covenant of grace ? — A. He tvas holy^ harm- less ; became obedient unto death ; and gave himself to he a sacrifice of a sweet-smelling savour unto God. Q. How do you prove Christ's righteousness to be the only proper condition of the covenant of grace? — A. Be- 92 OF THE COVENANT OF GRACE. cause it is the only pleadable ground of the believer's title to eternal life, Rom. y. 21 and vi. 23. Q. Is not faith the proper condition of this covenant ? — A. No ; for it can no way answer the demands of the broken law ; and it is a blessing promised in the covenant of grace. Gal. iii. 17, Phil. i. 29. Q. Were then these godly divines in an error, who called faith the conditioji of the covenant of grace? — A. No ; for they only meant, that it was the instrument by which we are personally interested in that covenant, and receive the blessings of it. Acts xvi. 31. • Q. What is the promise of the covenant of grace 1 — A. It is the Father's engagement to bestow good things upon Christ, and his elect-seed, Isa. liii. 11, 12. Q. Is the promise of the covenant of great importance ? — A. Yes ; for it is confirmed by the oath of God ; and his glory, the honour of Christ, and the happiness of the elect, depend upon fulfilling of it. Q. How many kinds of promises are there in the cove- nant of grace 1 — A. Two kinds, viz, such as directly re- spect Christ's person, and such as relate to his people. Q. How may the promises respecting Chrisfs person be distinguished ] — A. Into absolute and conditional. Q. What are the absolute promises respecting Christ 1 — A. The promises of furniture for, and assistance in his work, Isa. xi. 2, 3, and xlii. 1, and Ixi. 1, 2, 3. Q. What is the only cause of the fulfilment of these promises 1 — A. The infinite sovereign love of God. Q. What furniture was promised to Christ 1 — A. A human nature, filled with the Holy Ghost, and united to his divine person, Heb. x. 5, Isa. xi. 2, 3. Q. What assistance was promised to Christ? — A. The continual influence of the Spirit, and the ministration of angels,