1 1 ^** PRINCETON, N. J. *Jjj Purchased by the Hamill Missionary Fund. J RPcrrr I Division Ky . ' .•*^ 1 ' ~— ' &;/&»* H..VJ....O.I 1 £ OP/ 1- V>' ISLAM UNDER THE KHALIFS OF BAGHDAD •• BY ROBERT DURIE OSBORN MAJOR IN THE BENGAL STAFF CORPS AUTHOR OF " ISLAM UNDER THE ARABS SEELEY, JACKSON, & HALLIDAY, 54, FLEET STREET LONDON. MDCCCLXXVIII. .411 rights nsvrvei. London : Printed by Simmons & Botien, Shoe Lane, E.C. PREFACE. " Islam under the Khalifs of Baghdad " is a con- tinuation of the work I published in the spring of last year, entitled " Islam under the Arabs." It constitutes the second in a series of three, the last of which will be devoted to a history of " Islam in India." The series, as a whole, may be regarded as an attempt to discover the veritable character of Islam, by an investigation of its actual results in the countries dominated by its influence. I little thought, when I resolved to undertake this long and difficult task, that I should publish the results of my labours at a time when the character of Islam was the subject of such passionate debate as it is at present. In one way this may be of advantage to my book. It may have the effect of obtaining for it a greater degree of attention than it otherwise would. But from another and more important point of view, it is distinctly disadvan- tageous. For the moment, my subject — a question of historical fact — is almost certain to be decided by the impulses of mere sentiment ; and it is well nigh inevit- able that by one party at least I should be denounced IV PREFACE. as illiberal, prejudiced, and partial. I would there- fore ask my readers to understand that the conclusions set forth in this book — be they right or wrong — have been in no way influenced by the " Bulgarian massacres," or Russo-Turkish war. They were formed and committed to writing many years ago ; they are the result of a long residence in India, and of many years' study of Moslem history and literature. But this question of the veritable character of Islam has been rendered needlessly obscure and difficult by another cause on which I should like to speak more at length. It has been mixed up with another question, which, in point of fact, has nothing to do with it. I mean the character of Muhammad. The character of Muhammad is, of course, a problem of great interest and no small difficulty. It has been approached by different writers from different standpoints ; and different theories have, in consequence, been started to account for it. In all these theories there are, probably, certain elements of truth; and none, we may be certain, which are not defective and insufficient. But the inner character of the Prophet has nothing to do with the practical con- sequences of Islam ; and this for a very simple reason. Throughout the Moslem world his words and his acts constitute the standard of morality. The servant of Islam never thinks and never has thought of at- tempting to penetrate behind the recorded act or speech to the motive which might have inspired it. PREFACE. V In all the acts and speeches of the Prophet, the Faith- ful see but one and the same impelling spirit. What- ever Muhammad did, he did under Divine guidance. The Koran is not his composition, but the direct utter- ances of the Deity. The sayings of the Prophet handed down by tradition are not the sayings of a man, but Divine decrees recorded on " the Everlasting Table ' before man and the world were called into existence. And so also with the acts of Muhammad. Whatever were his motives, none can deny that he had • mauy wives, that he massacred the men of a Jewish tribe in cold blood, that he traded in slaves, that he had recourse to the secret dagger to rid himself of dangerous opponents. These acts, in the belief of the Moslem world, are in perfect harmony with the Pro- phetic character, and were wrought with the Divine sanction. In estimating the results of Islam, this belief, with the distorted morality resulting from it, is the important fact to bear in mind ; the motives which impelled Muhammad are indifferent. In much that has been written on Islam, this dis- tinction has been disregarded ; and writers who think highly of Muhammad appear to regard themselves as bound in logic and in honour to think highly of his religion also. But the broad fact which has to be accounted for, is the general decadence of the Muham- madan world. To whichever quarter we look — to Northern Africa, to Egypt, Arabia, the Ottoman Empire, Persia, or the Khanates of Central Asia — the same spectacle of decay and increasing decrepitude confronts us. There is no soundness in it, but wounds VI PKEFACE. and bruises and putrefying sores ; the whole head is sick, and the whole heart faint. It cannot be urged that Islam is not responsible for this state of things, on the ground that Islam is merely a religion, and not a system of government ; Islam is both. Neither can it be urged, in defence of Islam, that this or that country has enjoyed transient periods of greatness and prosperity, notwithstanding its dominating presence. The very fact that these periods have left no lasting memorials behind them, in the shape of improved laws or civic freedom, furnishes the strongest proof that reform and growth are utterly alien to the enduring spirit of Islam. We are, in consequence, compelled to inquire if it be not in the scheme of life propounded by Muhammad that we must look for the reason of this melancholy sterility. What, then, was Muhammad's explanation of his own teaching ? It was briefly this — that the Arch- angel Gabriel came down from heaven, and revealed the Koran to him in the exact words in which he com- municated it to his followers. He had nothing to do either with its composition, or the doctrines it con- tains. This assurance has been accepted by the Faithful in all ages. From this conception of the character of the Koran, it follows that the contents of the revelation are above the reach of human criticism. It is either in every part the voice of the Archangel, or none of it is. The proof of its Divine origin is the assurance of Muhammad to that effect, not the cha- racter of the revelation itself, when tested by the human reason and conscience. PEBPAOE. Vli Another characteristic of Islam is, that it pro- fesses to regulate the relations between man and man, as well as between man and God. It founds a society and a polity, as well as supplying the elements of a creed. This important fact has been passed over by most writers with a very inadequate sense of its far- reaching significance. Because Muhammad taught the doctrine of the unity of God, it has been too hastily concluded that he was a great moral and social reformer as well. But there is no charm in the abstract doctrine of the unity of God to elevate humanity. The essential point is the character attri- buted to this one God. Christ conceived of God as Love ; He spoke of Him as building up a new society on the ruins of the old, of which love was to be the ruling principle, and sending forth His spirit into the hearts of men to guide them into all truth. Thus the regeneration of the moral life and the enlarge- ment of the intellect were set forth as the primary objects of the one God. But Muhammad conceived of God as separated by an impassable gulf from the creatures He had made, and finding His ideal of human existence in the customs of the desert Arabs. To the end of time men were to venerate the black stone ; to the end of time they were to practise slavery and poly- gamy, and believe in the doctrine of Fatalism. The last revelation had come down from heaven. The last Prophet had appeared among men. The Koran was the only and all-sufficient guide, and no change in its precepts was possible without the guilt of disobedience to a divine ordinance. Vlll PREFACE Islam, in fine, may be said to lay down these two propositions for the practical guidance of men: (1.) The idea of progress is impious, and should be eradicated from the mind. (2.) The knowledge of God is a fixed quantity revealed in a book ; the mind of man has no capacity to attain to it, more or less. The elements of truth in the teaching of Muhammad imparted their soul-subduing power to all that was false and puerile in it. If Muhammad had not set forth with such convincing power the unity and majesty of God, it is possible that his disciples might not have received with unquestioning credence his decrees upon lesser matters. As it was, they were incapable of discriminating. The man, and the book which had taught them to worship the one God, could not be mistaken when they bade them also venerate the black stone, and consecrated the practice of concubinage. Thus, the true, the false, the sensual, and the superstitious have been allowed to exist together in the creed of Islam, the latter choking and destroying the former. A chain is no stronger than its weakest link ; and it is the veneration paid to a black stone, not that to the One God, which denotes the high-water mark of the moral and intellectual life of the Moslem world. The prevailing impression of what Muhammad wrought in Arabia is, I fancy, something like this. He obliterated, as it were with a wet sponge, the pre- Islamite history of Arabia, by destroying the recol- lections of past feuds and welding the Arabs into a PREFACE. IX single nation. Nothing could well be more opposed to the truth. The Arabs, at that time, were divided into two great branches — the tribes of Yemen, and the tribes of Modhar. For centuries before the appear- ance of Muhammad, these tribes had been engaged in interminable wars. Islam did nothing to efface these distinctions, or mitigate the bitterness of old hatreds. And the idea of political progress having been de- nounced as impious, it was inevitable that when the tide of conquest was stayed, the fierce and restless energies of the Arabs should find a vent, in the recom- mencement of old quarrels. This, in point of fact, was what actually occurred. All that Islam, on this, its political side, had done for the Arabs was to furnish them with a wider theatre of conflict. The battles which, in former times, had been fought behind the barrier of the desert sands, were now fought in the heart of Asia. These incessant civil wars occa- sioned the fall of the House of Ommaya. They were of the tribes of Modhar ; the Persians sided with the tribes of Yemen against them, and drove them from power. The story of their ruin is told in my first volume. All this time, however, the other cardinal doctrine of Islam — that the knowledge of the will of God is a fixed quantity — was working out its own peculiar results. Islamism, as I have already said, is both a religious creed and a social and political system. The assumption which underlies it is, that the whole life of man is subjected to rigid ordinances which can be discerned by the aid of revelation alone. Conse- X PREFACE. quently, in order to frame laws for a Muliammadan state, the qualities required were not knowledge of men and experience of affairs, but a retentive memory, in order to master the subject-matter of revelation, and an accurate knowledge of "pure Arabic," in order to understand the precise meaning of it. The law- makers of Islam were secluded men, who founded their claim to be received as legislators, on the ground that they scrupulously abstained from all participation in public affairs. The actual needs of men were unknown and disregarded by them; the letter of the Sacred Text was all in all. This is the strange paradox which goes so far towards accounting for the unimproveableness of Moslem states. The practised politician, because he was a practised politician, was regarded as unfit to act as a legislator ; the recluse who knew nothing of the world, was for that very reason supposed to be the man best fitted to frame laws for its government. The first part of the present volume, " The Church of Islam," devotes two chapters to an account of the building up of this inflexible theocracy ; the last two chapters give an account of the efforts made by a few of the Faithful to escape from the prison-house in which they had been walled up, and the results of the attempts. The Orientalist will perhaps object that the chapter entitled "The Men of the Path," is a very insufficient account of Moslem mysticism. I am aware that this is so. But my purpose, in the present volume, is merely to exhibit the general tendency of the movement ; its more detailed exposition I reserve PEEFAOE. XI for " Islam in India." The fourth chapter, entitled " The Free-thinkers," and the whole of the second part, " The Supremacy of the Persians," tells the story of the curious struggle in the bosom of Islam, between the Rationalizing spirit and the spirit of Orthodoxy, terminating in the complete triumph of the latter. The third part, as the title shows, traces " The Decline of the Khalifate," from its loss of temporal power under the tyranny of its fierce Turkish mer- cenaries, down to the destruction of Baghdad by Houlagou and his Mongols. Here, agaiD, a few words of explanation are due to the student of Oriental history, to explain the meagreness of historical detail which marks certain portions of this section. I have passed over with only a cursory reference, all that period of Moslem history which extends from the murder of the khalif al Mutawakhil, to the founding of the Seljuk Empire — a space of nearly two hundred years. Why is this so ? As originally written, this portion of my book contained twice as much matter as it now does. I had devoted two long chapters to a history of the acts of the Turkish mercenaries, and the reigns of the Bouide priuces. But, od consideration, I thought it best not to print them. The purpose of my book is to write a history of " Islam," not a history of the " khalifs of Baghdad." A right understanding of Islam is in no way assisted or enhanced by com- pelling the weary reader to wade through a dreary series of wars and revolutions which have no more significance for us than the quarrels of wild beasts in Xll PREFACE. an antediluvian forest. Rather, it seems to me, its difficulty is greatly increased. The reader faints by the way, and gives up the attempt in despair. He prefers to remain in ignorance of "Islam" (which, after all, has, at no time, greatly inconvenienced him), if knowledge cannot be purchased except at so great a cost. The Crusades, also, are beyond the purpose of my book. These were fraught with consequences of immense importance to Europe ; but on "Islam," as a religion, they had no appreciable influence. The Crusaders came and went without modifying in the smallest particular, either the doctrine or the practice of the Moslem world. For the full understanding of the chapter on " The Sect of the Assassins " I must refer my readers to the second part of " Islam under the Arabs." In that part, entitled, " The Fatimides," I have given a full account of the growth and development of the Shia doctrines, till they reached their culminating point in producing the sect of the " Assassins." Without some knowledge of this past history, the doctrine and practice of the "Assassins" are unintelligible. As in my first volume, I have given my authorities at the end of the volume. But I take advantage of this opportunity to record how largely I am indebted to the learned and interesting works of Herr Yon Kremer — his " Culturgeschichte des Orients unter den Chalifen," and his " Geschichte der Herrschenden Ideen des Islam s." I have also derived much valuable information from a smaller work by Heinrich Steiner, entitled, 'Die Mutaziliten." This work is remarkable PREFACE. Xlll for a very able and exhaustive dissertation on the doctrine of " Predestination," as set forth in the Koran ; and this dissertation has been my chief guide in what I have said on the same subject. The first two chapters of this book appeared some time ago in the Contemporary Review, under the title of " Muhammadan Law : its growth and character." In rewriting them for the present volume, I have added many historical details and other matter which I thought inappropriate in a magazine article. R. D. OSBORN. 11, Marlboro' Eoad, St. John's Wood, 5th November, 1877. CONTENTS. PART I. THE CHURCH OF ISLAM. CHAPTER PAGE I. The Four Orthodox Imams 3 II. The Traditions 47 III. The "Men of the Path " 82 IV. The "Free-thinkers" 115 PART II. THE RULE OF THE PERSIANS. I. The Persian and the Arad 151 II. The Barmekides 177 III. The Civil War 208 IV. The Koranic Controversy 247 PART III. THE DECLINE OF THE KHALIFA! E. I. The Loss of Temporal Power 285 II. The Seljuk Sultans . . 313 III. The Sect of the "Assassins" 33G IV. The Fall of Baghdad 3G7 PART I. THE CHURCH OF ISLAM. CHAPTER I. THE FOUR ORTHODOX IMAMS. a.d. 713—830. The religion of Islam has often been praised for its freedom from a complicated and cumbersome ritual. Wherever, it is said, the true Believer finds himself, on land or on the sea, alone or in company, that spot becomes, at the appointed hour, a temple, whence he can address his prayers to God. Hence, it has been supposed that the Moslem passes through life with an immediate consciousness of the Divine Presence, pecu- liar to men of his creed. This consciousness has sur- vived the vicissitudes of history and the darkening effects of intellectual scepticism. Amid revolution, disaster, and anarchy, it is supposed to burn on with a clear and steady light, illuminating the bosoms of the Faithful in every part of the world, and binding all their hearts together. Therefore it is that all Islam is animated by a single spirit ; that all its pulses vibrate in unison, and all its swords are ready to leap from their scabbards in obedience to a single call. Like so much which has been written upon the creed of Muhammad, these notions are directly the reverse of the truth. The intellectual immobility of the Moslem 4 THE KHALIFS OF BAGHDAD. chap. i. world proceeds, not from an inner consciousness of the Divine Presence, but from the total want of it. According to the Moslem belief, the spirit of man is incapable of holding converse with the Spirit of God. Apart from the indications of His will contained in the Book and the Traditions, man neither knows nor can know anything about Him and His ways. All search, therefore, into the constitution of the universe or the mind of man, the Moslem condemns, at the outset, as certainly useless, and probably impious. And hence, also, there is no creed, the inner life of which has been so completely crushed under an inexorable weight of ritual. For that deep, impassable gulf which divides man from God, empties all religious acts of spiritual life and meaning, and reduces them to rites and cere- monies. They are laws to be obeyed. They do not imply that a way has been opened out between the visible and invisible world. Hence, also, there is not, nor ever has been, any " solidarity " in Islam. The resistless sovereignty of an inscrutable God has oblite- rated the notion of progress, and effectually prevented the idea of a national life from coming into existence. God is supreme ; what He wills can only be known by what He brings to pass ; and against His decrees, as manifested by the progress of events, it is idle to strive. Such is, and always has been, the political philosophy of the followers of Muhammad. To sketch the process of education which has achieved this result, is the object of the present chapter. The Arab of Muhammad's day conceived of religion as altogether a ceremonial affair. He believed in a a.d. 71:5. RITUAL OF ISLAM. 5 God, and he believed that this deity had commanded him to perform every year the ceremonies of the Pil- grimage. But why had God done this ? What plea- sure could a rational Being find in these absurd and meaningless rites ? What profit could they be to Him, or wherein lay their advantage to men ? Such inquiries never entered the mind of the Arab. It was the will of God ; and regarding the why and the wherefore, he never cared to speculate. The Prophet, a creature of his time if ever there was one, was as much a slave to this formalism as his countrymen about him. He no more than they felt the need of a logical connection between his speculative idea of God and the expres- sions of His character in the visible world. He never attempted to regard life as a whole, or to say to him- self, If God be such an one as I have depicted Him, then this and that custom which prevails among men must be utterly hateful to Him. The Prophet knew of no life but the life of the desert Arab, and without further question he accepted that life as being modelled after the Divine wish. The Prophet knew of no reli- gious life where the external rite was not deemed of greater importance than the inner state, and, in conse- quence, he gave that character to Islam also. Hence there are no moral gradations in the Koran. All pre- cepts proceed from the will of God, and all are enforced with the same threatening emphasis. A failure of per- formance in the meanest trivialities of civil life involves the same tremendous penalties as apostasy or idolatry. In the Traditions, this moral confusion is even more startlingly apparent. These Traditions are a record 6 THE KHALIFS OF BAGHDAD. chap. i. of the answers and acts of the Prophet in response to the inquiries of his followers ; and those who have not studied them know nothing whatever of the true spirit of Islam. They accumulated in this way. So long as Muham- mad lived, the Faithful were in possession of a door communicating with the Throne of God. At this door they had but to knock, state their perplexities, and a response came to them from "The Lord of the Glorious Throne." As Muhammad taught, and the Faithful believed, that the least transgression of the divine commands brought down the same punishments as the greatest, it is not strange that they availed themselves of this privilege freely. The Prophet accepted his position, as an essential part of the prophetic office, and never doubted of his capacity to make known the will of God regarding any matter submitted to his judgment. Thus the religion of Islam was gradually provided with an exceedingly rigorous and complicated ritual. But the point to be noted is the extreme stress laid upon the accurate observance of this ritual. The mind of the Believer literally counts for nothing. No ardour of faith, no purity of intention, can make up for a ceremonial defect. There was a right way and a wrong way of performing all religious acts whatsoever ; and the Arab could not conceive that aught was indiffe- rent or optional. " I asked Ayesha," said al Harith, one of the early Moslems, *' did the Prophet read the Koran at night loud or low ? " She said, " Sometimes loud; at other times in a low tone of voice." "Allah a.d. 713. RITUAL OF ISLAM. 7 to Akbar ! " shouted the delighted inquirer. " Praise be to God ! who has made religion so spacious and unconfined ! " That the amazement of al Harith, at the discovery of this " spacious and unconfined " freedom was by no means unnatural, will be apparent if I quote a few of the directions regarding Prayer : " When any one of you says his prayers, he must have something in front of him ; but if he cannot find anything for that purpose, he must put his walking-stick into the ground ; but if the ground be hard, then let him place it lengthways before him ; but if he has no staff, he must draw a line on the ground ; after which there will be no detriment in his prayers from anyone passing in front of it." This passing in front of a man is a terrible crime, and exceedingly detrimental to prayer, though it does not altogether nullify it. The Prophet empowered a Be- liever annoyed in this way to " draw his sword " upon the intruder, and "cut him down ;" and further declared that if " a passenger did but know the sin of passing before a person employed in prayer, he would find it better for him to sink into the earth." Equally impor- tant is the manner of performing the ablutions previous to prayer. When the Prophet performed these, "he took a handful of water, and raised it to the under part of his chin, and combed his beard with his hand, and said, ' In this way has my Lord ordered me.' " And on a certain occasion, when a party of his followers, performing their ablutions in a hurry, had omitted to wet the soles of their feet, the Prophet said, " Alas, on the soles of their feet, for they will be in hell fire ! " 8 THE KHALIFS OF BAGHDAD. chap. i. For sin, according to Muhammad, was a material pol- lution adhering to the body, and, like dirt, capable of being washed away. He enjoined upon his followers, in making their ablutions, to be careful not to allow so much as a finger-nail to remain dry, for, said he, "That person who makes ablution thoroughly will extract the faults from his body, even to those that may be lurking under his finger-nails;" and on the Day of Resurrection will be known by "his bright hands and feet," the effects of his frequent and conscientious washings. Not less important was the position assumed while praying. " Resting on the arms while at prayer is pleasing to the people of hell ;" so also is " hurry in prostration like a cock pecking grain," and "spreading the arms like dogs and tigers." The safest plan in this, as in all other things, was exactly to imitate the Prophet. And this was accordingly done. The Prophet's gestures and attitudes during prayer were carefully noted down, and have been imitated by the Faithful ever since. The tradition rests on the authority of Ayesha, and is as follows : — " The Prophet used to begin his prayers by repeating the Tacbir, and the reading of the Koran with these words : — ' Praise be to God, the Lord of the Worlds ! ' And when he made the inflexion of the body called Eekat, he did not raise his head, nor yet bend it very low, but kept it in a middle position between these two, with his neck and back in a line. And when he had raised his head after inflexion, he did not prostrate himself, till after having stood quite erect, and alter he had raised his head from one prostration, he did not make a stand without sitting up in the interval. And he used to lay bis left leg down, and his right leg he kept up ; and he forbade resting both arms on the ground, and finished his prayers with the salaam" a.d. 713. VALUE OF PRAYERS. 9 Prayers also possessed varying degrees of merit; and these were precisely settled by the Prophet : — " The prayers of a man in his own house are equal to the reward of one prayer ; but in a musjid, being near his house, equal to twenty-five prayers ; and if in the public musjid, equal to five hundred prayers ; and in Jerusalem, equal to fifty thousand ; and in my musjid, equal to fifty thousand ; and in the Kaaba, equal to one hundred thousand."* The same formal and legal character runs through the whole body of the Traditions. They are a collec- tion of statutes which are supposed to embrace the entire sphere of man's daily activity. The object they strive after is to preclude the need of any appeal to the unassisted reason of man. The khalifs who succeeded the Prophet possessed merely an administrative power. They were the trustees and executors of a system already complete. They had no power to initiate new legislation, or depart from the letter of what was written. But whatever might be the number of Tra- ditions, it soon became apparent that they could not meet and solve the needs of the great Empire which was won by the Faithful immediately after the Pro- phet's death. Multitudes of questions came up for decision for which no precedent was to be found either * It is related of al Muzani — a disciple of as Shafi, so eminent, that that Imam said of him, " He is the champion of my doctrine " — that " when he missed being present at public service in the Mosque, he repeated his prayers alone twenty- five times, in order to regain the merits attached to those which are said with the congregation ; in this he founded his opinion on the authority of the following declaration made by Muhammad : ' Prayers made with the congre- gation are five-and-twenty times better than prayers said by one of you when alone.' " — Ibn Khali, vol. i. p. 201. 10 THE KHALIFS OF BAGHDAD. chap. I. in the Koran or the Traditions. What, under such circumstances, were the rulers and governors of the people to do ? They had recourse to " the method of analogical deduction." This practice was authorised by more than one Tradition. When, for example, the Prophet selected Muad ibn Jabal as Governor of Yemen, and was about to despatch him thither, he said to him, "0 Muad! after what manner will you judge?" He replied, " After the Book of God." " And should you find nothing there?" "After the rules of the Prophet of God." "And should you find nothing there ? " " Then, by deduction, after the best of my judgment." Thereupon the Prophet lifted up his eyes to heaven, and exclaimed, "God be praised, who has given to His Prophet a messenger with whom he is well pleased." Matters went on in this way until the murder of the khalif Ali. He is the last of the "rightly-guided khalifs." Such is the designation given to the khalifs Abou Bekr, Omar, Othman, and Ali. These four sovereigns had been the chief disciples and most inti- mate friends of the Prophet. They were acquainted with all that he had spoken or done ; and they had entered into the thoughts and intents of his heart as completely as men could do. They were as zealous as their master himself for the dissemination and triumph of the faith. And, allowing for the inevitable frailty of humanity, they were not less watchful to keep it uncontaminated by heresy or unbelief. So long, there- fore, as they presided over the destinies of the true Believers, the Moslem experienced a firm and satisfac- a.d. 713. COLLECTING THE KORAN. 11 tory assurance that he was being guided in the right way. There was, moreover, a prejudice against reduc- ing the deposit of faith to writing. The Prophet had declared that Islam must be impressed upon the hearts of men ; and the Arabs, interpreting this, as they did all else which proceeded from their master, in its literal significance, supposed it to be an injunction to learn their religion by heart, and eschew all other methods of preservation. Nevertheless, so early as the khalifate of Abou Bekr. there had been a departure from the strict letter of this injunction. In the battle of Yemama, where Moseilama the Liar was killed, there had been a great slaughter of the Faithful ; and among the slain were a large number of those who knew more or less of the Koran by heart. Such men were called Koran Readers. Omar was warned by this incident of the exceeding great peril in which the world stood, lest the sacred utterances should wholly perish by the slaughter of those in whose memory they were engraved. And he urged upon the khalif Abou Bekr the need of collecting the scattered fragments of the Koran into a book. At first the khalif was reluctant. It seemed to him a dangerous departure from the precedent set by the Prophet. " How," said he, " can I do the thing which the Prophet has not done ? " But subsequently he perceived the wisdom of the advice, and entrusted the work of collecting the Koran to Zaid ibn Thabit, who formerly had acted as the secretary of the Prophet. And the latter " sought for the Koran from the leaves of the date, and white stones, and the hearts of men 12 THE KHALIFS OF BAGHDAD. CHAP. I. who remembered it," till the whole had been collected and compiled into one book. So matters remained until the time of the khalif Othman. In his day a devout Moslem came to Medina, and presented himself before the khalif. His name was Hudhaifa. He was a valiant warrior, and had fought on the truth of God in Syria, in Azerbaijan, Armenia, and elsewhere ; and he was shocked at the different ways of reading the Koran which he found prevalent among the soldiers of these armies. He now came to Othman to entreat him to " assist this sect, before they differ in the book of God, like as the Jews and Christians differ in their books." It was in response to this appeal that Othman caused to be made his famous recension of the text of the Koran. A copy of this he ordered to be sent to every quarter of the countries of Islam, and directed all others to be burned as inaccurate and misleading. But when Ali was murdered, and the supreme power over the Faithful passed to the house of Ommaya, devout Moslems perceived that the purity of the Faith was in extreme peril. These khalifs repre- sented the ascendency of that idolatrous Mekkan aris- tocracy, who, in heart, had never been converted to Islam. They knew nothing of the mind of the Pro- phet, and cared little to obey his precepts, even if they had known them. If, therefore, the Faithful were to continue to conduct their affairs according to the divine laws, measures must be promptly taken to make good the theological ignorance of these usurping khalifs. It is not surprising that this new movement should have a.d. 713. JURISCONSULTS OF MEDINA. 13 originated in Medina. The people of that city regarded themselves as, in a special sense, the depositaries of the true faith. They passed their lives in the midst of scenes which teemed with memories of the Prophet. There was the blessed mosque, wherein, for so many years, he had been wont to pray; there the houses wherein he had dwelt ; there the grave in which his sacred remains were deposited. There was not a denizen of Medina who could not recall some speech or act of the Prophet wherewith to swell the sum of the Traditions, and remain, for all time, a light shining in the darkness. This spiritual glory became the more precious to the people of Medina when its political im- portance had been transferred to Damascus. Devout men applied themselves to learn by heart the Koran, and the Traditions, and the "analogical judgments " of the "rightly directed" khalifs. Pre-eminent among these were seven divines known in the after history of the Muhammadan world as " the seven jurisconsults of Medina." The fame of their learning went abroad through all the regions of Islam ; and the khalifs, the governors of provinces, and all persons vexed with legal perplexities, who could do so, referred to them for counsel and advice. With the general consent of the Muhammadan world, they exercised the privilege of deciding, according to their own judgment, cases which could not be met by any of the existing sources of law. Thus the number of analogical judgments received an immense extension. And the mass of unwritten learn- ing threatened to become too vast and amorphous even for the Arab's vast and tenacious memory, when the 14 THE KHALIFS OF BAGHDAD. chap. I. inevitable systematiser appeared in the person of Malek ibn Anas. Malek was a native of Medina. He was born a.h. 95 (a.d. 713-14), and he died a.h. 179 (a.d. 795), in his eighty-fourth year. The pious affection of his disciples has preserved many interesting traits of this celebrated divine. He was, so we are told, of a very fair complexion, inclining to red; tall in stature, having a large head, and the forehead bald ; he wore clothes of those excellent stuffs which were, in those days, manufactured at Aden ; and he disapproved shaving off the moustachios, holding it to be a sort of mutilation ; he never changed the colour of his grey hair by dyeing it. He never, if he could avoid doing so, pronounced a Tradition when travelling, or when standing, or if he was pressed for time ; " for I like," he used to say, "to feel the meaning of the Prophet's words when I repeat them to others." He had a regularly fixed ceremony, which he deemed in- cumbent upon himself to go through before giving utterance to one of these sacred sayings. He first made an ablution ; he then seated himself in the middle of his mattress, and, spreading out his beard, he assumed a grave and dignified deportment ; after which preparations he commenced. " I delight," he was wont to say, by way of explanation — " I delight in testifying my profound respect for the sayings of the Apostle of God, and I never repeat a Tradition unless I feel myself in a state of perfect purity." In accordance with the same spirit of veneration, he never made use of a horse in Medina, even when much enfeebled and a.d. 795. MALEK IBN ANAS. 15 advanced in years. " No," he said, " I shall never ride in the city wherein the corpse of God's Apostle lies interred." This devout and excellent man passed his entire life in Medina, beloved and honoured by all. Once, and once only, does the peaceful tenor of his life appear to have been interrupted. In the reign of the second Abbaside khalif, Abou Jaafar, in a.h. 145, the city of Medina became the centre of a formidable Alide insurrection, which, for a time, placed the Abba- side khalifate in extreme danger. The Imam Malek took no part in this movement, but he was understood to have expressed an opinion that the descendants of Ali had a better right to the spiritual headship of the Muhammadan people than the descendants of Abbas. This opinion was necessarily noised abroad ; and on the restoration of peace he was summoned before the governor of the Hejaz — an uncle of Abou Jaafar — and accused of having taught that the oath of allegiance to the Abbaside khalif was not binding upon those who had taken it. The governor was so highly incensed that he had him stripped, and after inflicting on him a severe flogging, caused his arm to be drawn out to such a degree that it was dislocated at the shoulder. But this martyrdom only increased the veneration in which the great Imam was held. And this esteem and affection were in no wise diminished when the infirmities of increasing age compelled him gradually to relinquish the moral and social duties which are considered obli- gatory upon all good Moslems — such as attendance at the Friday prayer, the paying of visits of condolence, and assisting at the interment of brethren who have 16 THE KHALIFS OF BAGHDAD. chap. I. departed this life with the confession of Unity on their lips. His last moments are full of instruction. They show how profoundly he believed in the divine origin of the Koran and the Traditions, and how terrible was the thought that he might have interpreted these divine utterances amiss, becoming thereby to his fellow men a stone of stumbling and a rock of offence. " I went," we are told, by one of his most eminent dis- ciples — "I went to Malek ibn Anas in his last illness, and saluted him. I then sat down, and perceiving that he wept, I said, '0 Abou Abdallah ! what maketh thee weep ? ' And he answered, ' O Ibn Kaanaab ! why should I not weep ? and who has more reason to weep than I ? By Allah ! I wish I had been flogged and reflogged for every question of law on which I pronounced an opinion founded on my own private judgment. I had it in my power to abstain from doing so. that I had never given opinions founded on my own private judgment ! ' " The treatise composed, or rather dictated, by Malek ibn Anas is termed Muwatta, or " The Beaten Path." It was so called because it was founded on what he termed " the customs of Medina." These " customs " were the acts, commands, and prohibitions which were to be found in the Koran, or had been learned from the example and oral instruction of the Prophet. In other words, they constituted "the beaten path " along which it behoved the true Moslem to walk. What Malek effected was to arrange and classify under their appropriate heads, the immense mass of oral tradition which the remembrances of the Prophet, the teachings of the Traditionists, and the judgments of " the seven jurisconsults " had accumu- a.d. 795. YAHYA IBN YAHYA. 17 lated at Medina. When thus arranged and classified, it formed a system of jurisprudence which embraced the entire sphere of human activity, and speedily came to be regarded as of equal authority with the Koran itself. It prevailed chiefly throughout Spain and Northern Africa. For its establishment in the former country it was indebted to the zeal of a man who merits special mention in a work like this, as a striking illustration of the intensity and character of the reli- gious devotedness which Islam was fitted to evoke. Yahya ibn Yahya was by birth a Berber, whose grandfather had crossed over the sea and settled in Spain. While yet a young man, he obtained a partial knowledge of " The Beaten Path," and this so moved his admiration, that he formed the design of proceed- ing to Mekka, and studying at the feet of the great Imam. This design he carried into effect at the age of twenty-eight ; and the following incident obtained for him the special approbation of his master. He was, one day, at Malek's lecture with a number of fellow-students, when some one said, " Here comes the elephant ! " All ran out to see the animal except Yahya, who remained motionless in his place. "Why," said Malek, " did you not go out and look at it ? Such animals are not to be seen in Spain." To this Yahya replied, " I left my country for the purpose of seeing you, and obtaining knowledge under your guidance; I did not come here for the purpose of seeing the elephant." This reply so delighted the Imam that he ever after spoke of Yahya as " the intelligent man of Spain." Yahya studied under the dictation of Malek 18 THE KHALIFS OF BAGHDAD. chap. r. until he had learned by heart the whole of" The Beaten Path," with the exception of some paragraphs which treat of " spiritual retreat." He then set out to return home ; but when he got as far as the capital of Egypt, he met a fellow-disciple, who was occupied in making a written compilation of the doctrines he had learned from Malek. An examination of this work induced Yahya to return to Medina, and verify, by application to Malek, some of the matters recorded in it. He found Malek very ill, and stayed with him till he died. He made use of this interval to perfect his knowledge of " The Beaten Path ;" and the last edition of that work was given orally by Yahya ibn Yahya. The great Imam being dead, Yahya returned to Spain. He took his master for his model in all things. In his appearance, his dress, and manner of sitting, he is said to have greatly resembled Malek ; and he imitated him, also, in refusing to accept any office under the Government. This extraordinary abstinence made him extremely popular with great aDd small. He was the idol of the people ; and the friend and adviser of the Sultan of Cordova. " Never," writes a contemporary of his, " since the time of the introduction of Islamism did any of the learned enjoy such good fortune, such influence, and such a reputation as Yahya ibn Yahya. No kadi was appointed in any part of Spain, who had not first been designated by him ; and as he nominated none but those who adhered to the system of Malek, the profession of that system very speedily became universal throughout Spain." The causes of its spread in Northern Africa were different. Those who left Northern Africa to study the doctrines of their faith at some of the great centres a. ii. 700. ABOU HANIFA. 19 of learning, were naturally attracted to Medina, both by reason of its sacredness, and because it was the point nearest to their own homes. And there, finding the Malekite system universally received, they adopted it without inquiring further. It was, moreover, a system better suited to their simple methods of life than the more elaborate one of Abou Hanifa, of which and its founder we have now to give an account. The Imam Abou Hanifa an-Noman was born in the year 80 (a.d. 699-700), and belonged to a noble Persian family. The city of Basra was his birth-place ; and he made the pilgrimage to Mekka in his sixteenth year. He was a learned man, and a practiser of good works ; remarkable for self-denial, piety, devotion, and the fear of God ; humble in spirit, and constant in his acts of submission to the Almighty. He was, also, a handsome man, an agreeable companion, strictly honourable, and full of kindness to his brethren. He was rather above the middle height, and of a tawny complexion. No man spoke more eloquently than he, or with a sweeter tone of voice. The great work of his life was disclosed to him — as usual among good Muhammadans — through the medium of a dream. He dreamed that he was digging open the tomb of the Prophet, and having sent to inquire the meaning of this vision from an interpreter of dreams, he received the reply that "The person who had this dream will lay open a science never before discovered." The greater part of his life he passed in the city of Koufa. He achieved an immense fame by reason of his know- ledge of the law, and the subtlety and acuteness he 20 THE KHALIFS OF BAGHDAD. chap. I. displayed in applying the method of analogical deduc- tion. Malek ibn Anas said of him, " He was a man of such talent that if he spoke of this pillar and under- took to demonstrate that it was of gold, he would do so, and adduce good proofs." Nevertheless, like all of the devoutest believers, he shrank from putting his legal knowledge to any practical use. The Traditions are numerous which set forth the responsibilities incurred by that Moslem who assumes the position of a judge or a divider between his fellow-men ; and the terrible penalties awaiting the kadi who deviates from the straight path of strict equity. He — so said one of the Traditions — who shall be appointed judge over men, verily is killed without a knife. And on the day of resurrection there will come, even upon a just judge, such fear and horror that he will wish, " Would to God I had not ordered between two persons in a trial for a single date." For — " There is no judge who orders between men, whether just or unjust, but will come to God's court on the day of resurrection, held by the neck by an angel ; and the angel will raise his head up towards the heavens, and wait for God's orders ; and if God orders to throw him into hell, the angel will do it from a height of forty days' journey." Consequently, when Ibn Omar ibn Hobaira, the last Ommayide governor of the two Iraks, wished to appoint Abou Hanifa, kadi at Koufa, the latter refused to act. The emir, incensed at this opposition, ordered him to be daily flogged in public until he consented. Ten strokes of a whip were inflicted on Abou Hanifa, day after day, till the number had mounted up to one a.d. 760. ABOU HANIFA. 21 hundred and ten, when finding the fortitude of the Imam still unvanquished, the emir set him at liberty. The Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal never spoke of this occurrence without being moved to tears, and invoking God's mercy on Abou Hanifa.* When the Ommayas were overthrown, and the Abbasides came into power, Abou Hanifa was more than orice in imminent peril of his life. He had in- curred the enmity of some favourite courtiers of Abou Jaafar, who had resolved upon his destruction ; and but for the Imam's quickness of retort would, in all probability, have effected it. The story is told by Abou * The following anecdote is worth quoting as an example of the feelings occasioned by these and similar traditions ; and also as a curious picture of Moslem manners, and habits of thought. When Omar ibn Abd al Aziz was khalif, he wrote to Adi ibn Arta, who acted as his lieutenant in Irak, ordering him to effect a meet- ing between Iyas ibn Muawia and al Kasim ibn Rabia al Harashi, and authorising him to appoint the most acute minded of the two kadi at Basra. The meeting having taken place, Iyas said to Ibn Arta : " O emir ! ask the two great doctors of Egypt, al Hasan al Basri and Muhammad ibn Sirin, their opinion of al Kasim and me ;" for al Kasim went often to see them, while he, Iyas, did not. Al Kasim (being equally unwilling to fill the place of kadi, and aware that these two doctors would advise the emir to name him) said, " Make no inquiries respecting me or him, for I solemnly aver by the only true God, that Iyas ibn Muawia is an abler juris- consult than I, and knows better the duties of a kadee. If what I say be false, you cannot legally appoint me, because I am a liar ; and if my declaration be true, it is incumbent on you to receive it, and act by it." On this, Iyas said, " emir ! you set a man on the brink of perdition, and he escapes the dangers which he appre- hends, by making a false oath, for which he will implore God's for- giveness." " Since you perceive that," replied Adi ibn Arta, " you art fit to fill the place," and he appointed him accordingly, — Ibn Khali. Bio