■■■> j ii re. iiUMiwiwitA'W'ahw- i Mii«*jb.'«aasKi;,■ •;->"■'•■ H I ■ j>f,;*/ PRINCETON, N. J. S/^#". Section. .y.l\XZ+). Number it? GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. 3LotrtJe\s>. English- Havmoin\e.^, I88&. T\evisecA GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES OR THE DISPLACED SECTION OF S. LUKE. BY J. J. HALCOMBE, M.A., RECTOR OF BALSHAM AND RURAL DEAN OF NORTH CAMPS, FORMERLY READER AND LIBRARIAN OF CHARTERHOUSE. LONDON: C. J. CLAY AND SON, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, 1886 [All Rights reserved.] "That ye may believe that Jesus is The Christ, The Son of God ; and that believing ye may have life in His Name." S. John xx. 31. OBJECT OF THE PRESENT VOLUME; TO PROVE I. That on applying to the general arrangement of the Four Gospels certain rules of construction uniformly obtaining in their detailed narratives, it becomes at once apparent that a section of S. Luke's Gospel has been placed after a section which it originally preceded, and that a new and utterly con- fusing order of events has been created at three points : (a) where the section was taken from its right place, (J?) where it was in- serted in the wrong place, (c) where a fictitious connexion was established between the reversed sections. II. That, as it originally stood, the displaced section of S. Luke presented a singularly flagrant contradiction to what is, to the present day, supposed to be an implied statement of S. Mark. III. That the merely apparent contradiction involved by the original order of the text was got rid of at the cost, not only of creating a host of real though less immediately obvious con- tradictions, but of effectually obscuring the designed clue both to the original difficulty and to several minor difficulties of the same kind, viz. S. Luke's statement that he wrote "in order" and for the purpose of establishing the 'truthfulness of the Gospels (Aoycov) in which Theophilus had been instructed.' IV. That the above displacement being rectified, the general arrangement of the Gospels is perfectly simple throughout, S. Luke's restored order at once explaining both the exact plan of S. Matthew's Gospel and the rare and very slight departures from a chronological arrangement observable in S. Mark. V. That, in accordance with the implied statement of the Parable of the Barren Fig-tree, our Lord's Ministry lasted for a period of four years, eveiy portion of which is duly accounted for, and that in a manner which the exact order observed renders it impossible to misunderstand. H. G. b xviii. 6 '53 >» >) xviii. 7-9 154 J J )> xviii. 10-14 155 > J 5» xviii. 15-20 I56 5) J J xviii. 21-35 157 Summary. xix. 1, 2 Temple dues paid by a miracle. Instruction of Disciples. Summary. J*. 33 «• 33-37 ix. 38-42 ix. 43-50 SELF-ARRANGED. XXIX T S. LUKE. fourth year of Ministry. fourth year of Ministry, "Upon this rock." Prediction of sufferings. Bearing the Cross. The Transfiguration A child healed. The Passion foretold. ix. 18-20 ix. 21, 22 ix. 23-27 ix. 28-36 ix. 37-42 ix. 43-45 S. JOHN. Part of fourth year of Ministry, Instruction of Disciples. ix. 46-48 ix. 49, 50 H. G. XXX THE GOSPELS Sect. S. MATTHEW. S. MARK. Chap. XV. At Feast of Tabernacles in fourth 158 ... .. 159 160 ... 161 ... 162 ... 163 164 ... ... 165 166 ... .. 167 16S ... 169 .. 170 ... Chap. XVI. Feast of Dedication in l fourth 171 172 173 Counting the cost*. Chorazin *. viii. 10-22 xi. 20-24 174 175 Christ rejoices. xi. 25-27 176 "Come unto Me." xi. 28-30 177 178 ... 179 180 ... 181 182 ... 183 ... ... ... 184 185 186 ... ... ... 187 188 ... '" SELF-ARRANGED. XXXI S. LUKE. S. JOHN. year of Ministry. Secret Journey to F. of Tabernacles. vii. 2-1 1 Conflict of opinion. vii. 11-13 The Divine Teacher. vii. 14-24 Christ and the Jews. vii. 25-36 ... "If any man thirst." vii. 37-44 Nicodemus. vii. 45-52 Woman taken in Adul- tery. The Light of the World. viii. i-ii viii. 12-19 ... "I go away." "Who art thou?" viii. 20-24 viii. 25-29 True Freedom. viii. 30-47 "Before Abraham was I am." viii. 48-58 "They took up stones." viii. 59 year of Ministry. Public Journey to F. of Dedication. ix. 51-56 ... Counting the cost. ix. 57-62 ... The Seventy. Chorazin. x. 1-16 Return of the Seventy. x. 17-20 ... Christ rejoices. x. 21-24 The Good Samaritan. x- 25-37 ... ... With Martha and Mary. x. 38-42 "Blind from his birth." Questionings. Pharisees disconcerted. Christ finds and teaches him who had been blind Parabolic meaning of miracle. The Sheepfold. Christ the Door. The Good Shepherd. ' He hath a Devil." They seek to stone Him. ix. 1-7 ix. 8-12 ix. 13-34 ix. 35-38 ix. 39-41 x. 1-6 x. 7-10 x. 11-18 x. 19-21 x. 22-39 d 2 xxxn THE GOSPELS Sect. S. MATTHEW. S. MARK. Chap. XVII. Journey to Bethany in fourth 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 19$ 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 Summary repeated. Summary repeated. Chap. XVIII. Last Journey to Jerusalem 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 Jewish Law of Divorce. Christian Law of Mar- riage. Little children. xix. 3-9 xix. 10-12 xix. 13-15 Jewish Law of Divorce. Christian Law of Mar- riage. Little children. x. 2-9 X. 10-12 x. 13-16 SELF-ARRA NGED. XXXlll S. LUKE. S. JOHN. year of Ministry. "Teach us to pray." Prayer effectual. ,, answered. [Here "Displaced Sec- tion" was inserted.} Journey into Judcea. Jews1 rejection foretold. Herod. Three days. Sabbath Miracle. Parable of Marriage Feast. Parable of Great Sup- per. Third Day. Self-denial. God's love to sinners. The Unjust Steward. The Pharisees rebuked. Dives and Lazarus. xi. 1-4 xi. 5-8 xi. 9-13 X1U. 22 xiii. 23-30 xiii. 31-35 xiv. 1-6 xiv. 7-14 xiv. 15-24 xiv. 25-35 xv. 1-32 xvi. 1-13 xvi. 14-18 xvi. 19-3 1 "Beyond Jordan." Prayer from Bethany. "Let us go into Judaea.'' Raising of Lazarus. x. 40-42 xi. 1-6 xi. 7-16 xi. 17-44 Offences. Forgiveness. In Sycamine District. On the way to Jerusalem. The kingdom of God. The Unjust Judge. The Publican justified. Little children. xvii. 1-4 xvii. 5-10 xvii. 11-19 xvii. 20-37 xviii 1-8 xviii 9-14 xviii 15-17 Offence caused. Christ at Ephraim. «• 45-53 «• 54 XXXIV THE GOSPELS Sect. S. MATTHEW. S. MARK. Chap. XVIII. Last Journey to Jerusalem 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 The Young Ruler. ' ' They that have riches. ' ' ♦'What shall we have?" Labourers in Vineyard. The Passion foretold. Request of James and John. He touched eyes." their XIX. 10-22 xix. 23-26 xix. 27-30 xx. 1-16 xx. 17-19 xx. 20-28 xx. 29-34 The Young Ruler. x. 17-22 "They that have riches.": x. 23-27 Christ's Rewards. x. 28-31 52-34 The Passion foretold. Request of James and x. 35-45 John. In the house of a Chief x. 45 Publican. Bartimseus. x. 46-52 Chap. XIX. Final Teaching. 230 231 1X1 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 Mary anointeth Him*. Entry into Jerusalem. The Temple cleansed. Christ at Bethany. The Withered Fig-tree. By what authority? The Two Sons. The Vineyard and hus- bandmen. Marriage of King's Son. Tribute to Ciesar. The Sadducees and the Resurrection. The great Command- ment. David's Son. The Pharisees condem- ned. XXV • 6-13 xxi. 1-11 xxi. 12-16 xxi. 17 xxi. 18-22 xxi. 23-27 xxi. 28-32 xxi. 33-46 xxii 1-14 xxii 15-22 xxii 23-33 xxii. 34-4° xxii. 41-46 xxiii • 1-34 Mary anointeth Him*. Entry into Jerusulem. Christ at Bethany. The Leafy Fig-tree. The Temple cleansed. " Every Evening." The Withered Fig-tree. By what authority? The Vineyard and hus- bandmen. Tribute to Csesar. The Sadducees and the Resurrection. The great command- ment. David's Son. The Pharisees condem- ned. xiv. 3-9 xi. I-JO xi. 11 xi. 12-14 xi. 15-18 xi. 19 xi. 20-26 xi. 27-33 xii 1-12 xii »3-i7 xii 18-27 xii. 28-34 xii 35~37a xii. 37b-4<> SELF-ARRANGED. XXXV S. LUKE. S. JOHN. (continued). The Young Ruler. •' They that have riches." Christ's Rewards. The Passion foretold. "Receive thy sight." In the house of a Chief Publican. A mistake corrected. xviii. 18-23 xviii. 24-27 xviii. 28-30 xviii. 31-34 xviii. 35-43 xix. 1-10 xix 11-27 Entry into Jerusalem. The Temple cleansed. By what authority? The Vineyard and hus- bandmen. Tribute to Caesar. The Sadducees and the Resurrection. David's Son. The Pharisees condem- ned. xix. 29-44 xix. 45- xx. 9-19 xx. 20-26 xx. 27-40 xx. 41-44 xx. 45-47 Mary anointeth Him. Entry into Jerusalem. xi. 55-xn. II xii. 12-19 XXXVI THE GOSPELS Sect. S. MATTHEW. S. MARK. _ Chap. XIX. Final Teaching {continued). 246 Widow's mite. xii. 41-44 247 Destruction of Temple. xxiv. 1, 2 Destruction of Temple. xiii. 1, 2 248 What Sign? xxiv. 3 What sign? xiii. 3, 4 249 False Christs. xxiv. 4-8 False Christs. xiii. 5-8 250 Sufferings of disciples. xxiv. 9-14 Sufferings of disciples. xiii. 9-13 251 The time for flight. xxiv. 15-28 The time for flight. xiii. 14-23 252 "The Son of Man com- ing." xxiv. 29-31 "The Son of Man com- ing." xiii. 24-27 253 " The Summer is nigh. " xxiv. 32-41 "He is nigh." xiii. 28-32 254 "Watch." xxiv. 42-51 "Watch." xiii. 33-37 255 The Virgins. — The Ta- lents. xxv. 1-30 ... 256 "Inherit the Kingdom." xxv. 31-46 257 Summary (repeated). xi. 19 258 Covenant of Betrayal. xxvi 1-5, 14 -16 Covenant of Betrayal. xiv. i, 2, 10, 259 ... ... • .. ... ... . . . 260 . . • • • • • • • 26 r Chap. XX. Closing Scenes. 262 Passover prepared. xxvi. 17-19 Passover prepared. xiv. 12-16 263 First Paschal cup *. xxvi 20, 29 First Paschal cup*. xiv. 17, 25 264 Judas, "Is it I?" xxvi. 21-25 Judas, "Is it I?" xiv. 18-21 265 "He took bread." xxvi. 26 " He took bread." xiv. 22 266 267 " The cup after supper." xxvi. 27, 28 " The cup after supper." xiv. 23, 24 268 269 270 271 272 273 ... 274 " They went out." xxvi. 30 " They went out." xiv. 26 SELF-ARRA NGED. XXX VI 1 S. LUKE. S. JOHN. Widow's mite. Destruction of Temple. What sign? False Christs. Sufferings of Disciples. The time for flight. "The Son of man com- ing." "The Summer is nigh." "Watch." Summary. Covenant of Betrayal. XXI. !-4 xxi. 5,6 xxi. 7 xxi. 8-i i xxi. 12-19 xxi. 20-24 xxi. 25--S xxi. 29-33 xxi. 34-36 xxi. 37, 3* xxii. 1-6 Certain Greeks. ; xii. 20-26 A voice from Heaven, xii. 27-36 Belief in Christ. xii. 37-50 Passover prepared. First Paschal cup. " He took bread." " The cup after supper." Betrayal. S. Peter warned. " And He came out." xxn. 7-13 xxii. 14-1S xxn. 19 xxu. 20 xxii. 21-24 xxii. 25-38 xxn. 39 He washes disciples' feet. Betrayal. A new commandment. Many mansions. The promise of the Comforter. Xlll. 1-20 X1U. 21 -30 xiii. 3i -38 xiv. 1- '4 xiv. J5 -3i XXXV111 THE GOSPELS Sect. S. MATTHEW. S. MARK. Chapter XX. Closing Scenes {continued). 275 276 On the way to Gethsa- mane. xxvi. 30-35 On the way to Gethsa- mane. xiv. 26-31 277 The Agony in the Gar- den. xxv i. 36-46 The Agony in the Gar- den. xiv. 32-42 278 The Betrayal. xxvi. 47-50 The Betrayal. xiv. 43-46 279 Malchus. xxvi. 51-54 Malchus. xiv. 47 280 "Are ye come out, as — " xxvi. 55, 56 "Are ye come out, as — " xiv. 48, 49 281 "All left Him." xxvi. 56 "All left Him." xiv 50-52 Chap. XXI. Closing Scenes. 282 Before Annas. xxvi. 57, 58 Before Annas. xiv. 53, 54 283 Before Caiaphas. xxvi. 59-66 Before Caiaphas. xiv. 55-64 284 Mockings. xxvi. 67, 68 Mockings. xiv. 65 285 Peter's denials. xxvi. 69, 70 Peter's denials. xiv. 66-68» 286 5> 5> xxvi. 71, 72 11 ■>■> xiv. 68b-7o 287 »» >» xxvi. 73-75 >> j> xiv. 7ob-72 288 289 Jesus is sent to Pilate. xxvii. 1, 2 Jesus is sent to Pilate. XV. 1 290 Judas. xxvii. 3-10 291 ... ... 292 ... ... 293 Pilate questions Jesus. xxvii. 11 Pilate questions Jesus. XV. 2 294 Pilate takes Jesus out. xxvii. 12-14 Pilate takes Jesus out. xv. 3-5 ^95 296 297 Proposal to release. xxvii. 15-18 Proposal to release. XV. 6-10 298 Pilate's wife's message. xxvii. 19 299 Barabbas. xxvii. 20 Barabbas. XV. II 300 "Crucify Him." xxvii. 21-23 " Crucify Him. xv. 12-14 30I Soldiers mock Him*. xxvii. 27-30 Soldiers mock Him*. xv. 16-19 302 ... ... 303 ... ... 304 SELF-ARRANGED. XXXIX S. LUKE. S. JOHN. The Agony in the Gar- xxii. 39-46 den. The Betrayal. xxii. 47, 48 Malchus. xxii. 49-51 "Are ye come out, as — " xxii. 52, 53 Farewell discourse. Agony in Garden. The Betrayal. Malchus. XV, XVI, XVII xvm. 1, 2 xvm. 3-9 xviii. 10, 11 Before Annas. Peter's denials. Continued mockings. Jesus is sent to Pilate. Pilate goes out to the Jews. Pilate questions Jesus. Jesus is sent to Herod. Pilate acquits Jesus. Proposal to release. "Crucify Him." xxii. 54, 55 xxii. 56, 57 xxii. 58 xxii. 59-62 xxii. 63-65 xxii. 66 — xxiii. 1 xxni. 3 xxiii. 4-12 xxiii. 13-15 xxiii. 16 xxui. 18-23 Before Annas. Peter's denials. The Judgment Hall. Pilate goes out to the Jews. Pilate questions Jesus. Pilate takes Jesus out. Jesus is sent to Herod. Proposal to release. "Crucify Him." Soldiers mock Him. "Behold the man." "Whence art thou." "Behold your King. xvm. 12-24 xviii. 25 xviii. 26, 27 xviii. 28 xviii. 39-32 xviii. 33-38 xviii. 38 xviii. 38 xviii. 29 xviii. 40 xix. 1-3 xix. 4-7 xix. 8-1 1 xix. 12-15 xl THE GOSPELS Sect. S. MATTHEW. S. MARK. Chap. XXI. Closing Scenes {continued). 305 Christ delivered up. xxvii. 24-26 Christ delivered up. xv. 15 306 ,, led away. xxvii. 31 ,, led away. xv. 20 3°7 On the way to Cruci- xxvii. 32 On the way to Cruci- XV. 21 fixion. fixion. 308 Wine mingled with gall. xxvii. 33, 34 Wine mingled with myrrh. XV. 22, 23 309 Crucified. xxvii. 38 Crucified. xv. 25-27 310 3ii His garments divided. xxvii. 35 His garments divided. xv. 24 312 He is mocked. xxvii. 39-43 He is mocked. xv. 29-32 3r3 The Title. xxvii. 36, 37 The Title. xv. 26 3H Thieves reproach Him. xxvii. 44 Thieves reproach Him. xv. 32 315 ... 316 ... ... 3i7 Darkness. xxvii. 45-47 Darkness. xv. 33-35 318 "I thirst." xxvii. 48, 49 I thirst. xv. 36 3r9 ... 320 Signs. xxvii. 51-53 Signs. xv. 38 321 Jesus dieth. xxvii 50 Jesus dieth. xv. 37 322 The centurion. xxvii. 54 The Centurion. xv. 39 323 324 The Women. xxvii. 55, 56 The Women. xv. 40-41 Chap. XXII. Burial, Resurrection, and As- 325 326 Joseph of Arimathrea. xxvii. 57, 5& Joseph of Arimathasa. xv. 42-45 327 Nicodemus and Joseph. xxvii. 59 Nicodemus and Joseph. xv. 46 328 Jesus is buried. xxvii. 60 Jesus is buried. xv. 46 329 Sepulchre closed. xxvii. 60 Sepulchre closed. xv. 46 33o The Two Maries. xxvii. 61 The Two Maries. xx. 47 33i 332 Sepulchre made sure. xxvii. 62-66 333 The two Maries. xxviii. 1 334 Two Maries and Salome. xvi. 1 335 Stone rolled away. xxviii. 2-4 SELF-ARRA NGED. xli S. LUKE. S. JOHN. Christ delivered up. xxiii. 23-25 Christ delivered up. xix. 16 On the way to Cruci- xxiii. 26-32 On the way to Cruci- xix. 17 fixion. fixion. Crucified. xxiii. 33 Crucified. xix. 17, 18 "Father, forgive them." xxiii. 34 His garments divided. xxiii. 34 His garments divided. xix. 23, 24 He is mocked. xxiii. 35-37 The Title. xxiii. 38 The Title. "Behold Thy Mother." xix. 19-22 xix. 25-27 The Penitent thief. xxiii. 39-43 ... Darkness. xxiii. 44, 45a "I thirst." "It is finished." xix. 28, 29 xix. 30 Signs. xxiii. 45b Jesus dieth. xxiii. 46 Jesus dieth. xix. 30 The Centurion. xxiii. 47 ... The multitude. xxiii. 48 ... ... The Women. xxiii. 49 cension. His side is pierced. xix. 31-37 Joseph of Arimathaea. xxiii. 50-52 Joseph of Arimathsea. xix. 38 Nicodemus and Joseph. xxiii. 53 Nicodemus and Joseph. xix. 39, 40 Jesus is buried. xxiii. 53, 54 Jesus is buried. xix. 41, 42 Women from Galilee. xxiii. 55, 56 ... xlii THE GOSPELS Sect. S. MATTHEW. S. MARK. Chap. XXII. Burial, Resurrection, and As 336 ... ... 337 The women from Galilee. xvi. 2 338 Stone found rolled back. xvi. % 4 339 The Angel's invitation. xxviii. 5, 6 340 The second Angel. xvi. 5 34i Women amazed. xvi. 5 342 An Angel addresses the women. xxviii. 7 An Angel addresses the women. xvi. 6, 7 343 Most of women flee. xvi. 8 344 The two Maries xxviii. 8 ... 345 Jesus appears to Mary. xvi. 9 34<5 Rest of women see Jesus. xxviii. 9, 10 Disciples informed. xvi. io, 11 347 ... 348 The soldiers and Chief Priests. xxviii. n-15 ... 349 Journey to Emmaus. xvi. 12 350 Report of Disciples. xvi. 13 35i 352 S. Thomas absent. xvi. 14 353 ... 354 355 ... 356 357 The Eleven in Galilee. xxviii. 16, 17 358 Apostolic commission. xxviii. 18-20 Apostolic commission. xvi. 15-18 359 360 ... 361 The Ascension. xvi. 19 362 ... ... 363 ... 364 ... Apostles go forth. xvi. 20 SELF-ARRANGED. xliii S. LUKE. S. JOHN. cension {continued}. The Women from Galilee. Stone found rolled back. xxiv. i xxiv. 2 Mary Magdalene. XX. I Two Angels. Women affrighted. Address of the two Angels. xxiv. 3, 4 xxiv. 5 xxiv. 5-7 ... Rest of women tell dis- ciples. Peter believes. xxiv 8-1 1 xxiv. 12 Mary Mag., Peter and John. Jesus appears to Mary. Mary Magdalene's re- port. xx. 2-9 xx. 10-17 xx. 18 Journey to Emmaus. xxiv. 13-33 The two join the eleven. S. Thomas absent. xxiv. 33-35 xxiv. 36-43 S. Thomas absent. S. Thomas present. Unrecorded signs. At the sea of Tiberias. Conclusion. xx. 19-25 xx. 26-29 xx. 30, 31 xxi. 1-24 xxi. 25 S. Luke's summary. Parting injunctions. Acts i. 1-5 1-6, 8 : ::: The Ascension. The Angel's promise. Return to Jerusalem. Luke xxiv 44-49 ,, xxiv. 50, 51 Acts 1. 9 ,, 1. 10 11 Luke xxiv 52 53 Acts i. 12, 14 CHAPTER I. IS IT A THING INCREDIBLE THAT THE GOSPELS AS FIRST GIVEN TO MEN SHOULD HAVE EXHIBITED A PER- FECT UNITY OF DESIGN AND EXECU- TION ? However wide a range of subjects might be taken, it would probably be impossible to formulate any proposi- tion which should at once suggest such conclusive evidences of its own incredibility, and yet be in itself so intrinsically probable, as the following : " That the real order of events related in the four Gospels is not a matter of opinion, but is capable of absolute demonstration." The proposition is at first sight in direct contradiction to all the evidences supplied by the Gospels themselves; it is altogether opposed to opinions, which are the product of centuries of inquiry, and which in modern times have been endorsed alike by scholars and theologians ; its acceptance would mean, not only that this or that set of opinions upon a great variety of keenly debated questions must be erroneous, but that at least the great majority of the alleged discrepancies and contradictions, which give rise to such controversies, are simply non-existent. h. g. e xlvi GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. Assume the proposition to be true, and the very corner- stone of works written for the purpose of impugning the historical truthfulness of the Gospels at once falls from its place, whilst a whole class of works dealing with the other side of the question become at once mere literary anachron- isms. Such a monument of patient labour and critical inves- tigation as those five octavo volumes of Dissertations, in which Mr Greswell supported the views put forward in what for a long time was the received text-book of our two Universities, the Harmonia Evangelica, must, for instance, appear, in spite of the vast wealth of learning which it exhibits, to be merely a house built upon the sand ; all his "Dissertations" turning out to be based upon an utter fallacy, and that simply because, of all the ' transpositions ' of the text which they are meant to justify, scarcely one would be found to be either necessary or admissible. And yet, in spite of all this array of evidence of incredi- bility, the proposition undoubtedly does carry with it a certain air of intrinsic probability — a probability manifestly arising from the fact that the establishment of it would only be a fresh testimony to the certain erroneousness of all opinions, however universally held, which in the smallest degree derogate from the perfect Unity and Truthfulness of the several parts of the Inspired Word of God. But having already placed on one side of the balance the antecedent incredibility admittedly attaching to our proposi- tion, let us place on the other some further and more detailed suggestions with reference to its antecedent and intrinsic probability. For only by so doing, and that on the very J HE UNITY OF THE GOSPELS. xlvii threshold of our inquiry, is it at all possible to anticipate the unreasoning non placet of the objector, and to counteract the feeling of impatience and consequent prejudice, which any reopening of a question generally supposed to be settled for all time, must necessarily evoke. Of the many considerations which might more or less serve the purpose thus indicated, perhaps the following will carry the most weight — i. Existing opinions with regard to the Gospels, so far as they are inconsistent with the Gospels being in the f idlest sense of the word Inspired, rest upon an assumption, which itself rests upon merely assumed inaccuracies, and which, if erroneous, is a snare as fatal to any adequate examination of them as any glaringly false assumption tuould necessarily be in any subject of recognised scientific inquiry. Let us suppose the Inspiration of Holy Scripture to be accepted in the plain sense of such passages as the following, Well spake the Holy Ghost by Isaiah the prophet. Acts xxviii. 25. It is not ye that speak, but the Holy Ghost. Mark xiii. 11. Thus saith the Holy Ghost. Acts xxi. 11. As the Holy Ghost saith, To-day if ye &c. Heb. iii. 7. No prophecy ever came by the will of man : but men spake from God, being moved by the Holy Ghost. 2 Peter i. 21. The Holy Ghost this signifying, that &c. Heb. ix. 8. Every Scripture is inspired of God. 2 Tim. iii. 16. It will then follow as a necessary consequence (1) That the books of Holy Scripture are not to be judged exclusively, nor even primarily, by the laws which e 2 xlviii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. govern ordinary literary productions, but by those which govern other works of God, viz. those realms of nature which are the special fields of scientific research. (2) That all scrutiny of the books of Holy Scripture, based upon a supposed exact parallelism between them and ordinary literary productions, will be altogether, as men speak, unscientific, and so liable to lead to altogether erroneous results. (3) That Holy Scripture affords a field of inquiry not only immeasurably more important, but, from the variety and exceptional combinations of the phenomena which it presents, more fitted to tax to the utmost all the natural and acquired powers of the human intellect than any with which modern science has as yet grappled. Apply these conclusions to the study of the Gospels, and it is evident that there is no necessary prima facie reason for doubting that when they have been once made the objects of that kind of study, which their origin, thus regarded, imperatively demands, we may find that there is as much difference between the appearance which they present when viewed as human compositions, and that which they present when their underlying but essential constructive elements are understood, as there is between the actual knowledge with which some old-world sage might have gazed at the phenomena of the heavens and that which enables the astronomer of to-day to deduce conclusions from them with such unerring accuracy. Speaking of his early studies in chemistry at Giessen the late Mr Frank Buckland says, "When a young man begins here he generally goes through the course of analysing a set of one hundred THE UNITY OF THE GOSPELS. xlix bottles, which takes him sometimes a year. These bottles are various compounds which he must find out; viz., in the first ten he has only to find one metal &c. \ in the second two metals or substances &c. ; till at last the highest bottles contain six or seven substances, all of which he must find out1." But where are the "bottles" which may thus serve for the first training of the scientific theologian? The very necessity for providing them is not yet recognized, whilst the cumulative stores of knowledge requisite to fill them have yet to be gathered. Assumptions of error and imperfection, standing as with a flaming sword at the gate of knowledge, have prevented any from entering in just as much as similar assumptions would have prevented men from entering into any of those fields of inquiry which in recent times have produced the richest harvest of results. The bee may have all the instincts of untiring energy implanted in it, but if, from some superinduced defect of sight, it regard all honey- producing vegetation as a beach of shingle it is certain, so long as that defect remains, to find its labour profitless. Let us continue to assume that Holy Scripture, being the express Revelation of Him of whom it is said, God is Truth, does in fact present a field of inquiry which has special claims to be termed scientific, and we are bound to recognize as lying open before us a wholly unexplored region of facts which for importance must dwarf every other into comparative insignificance. That the Gospels should contain these facts in their most highly developed form, and that they should afford 1 Life of F. Buckland, p. 53. 1 GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. the designed key to the elucidation of such of the mysteries of Creation and Redemption as from time to time it may seem good to The Author of all wisdom more fully to revealr would be a natural corollary to our assumption. It is therefore with reference to the Gospels especially that it behoves us to seek to ascertain the truth or untruth of an assumption as to the nature and extent of the Inspi- ration of their writers, upon which so much depends. A merely experimental attempt to examine closely the varied phenomena of the Gospels reveals facts wholly inconsistent with many theories, as to the origin of the Gospels, which, if accepted, would go furthest to support any assumption of inaccuracy. Even the few portions of the Gospels which, in the annexed arrangement of them, are subdivided with anything approximating to minuteness will — at least as far as their constructive phenomena are concerned — afford considerable evidence of this assertion. Let us take for instance the parallel narratives, which present the most acknowledged difficulty, those detailing the circumstances attending our Lord's Resurrection. It would be impossible to imagine explanations at once more learned, more elaborate, more complicated, but withal more contradictory, than those to which the four narratives of this event, and the necessity of reconciling them with the expressions used by the two disciples journeying to Emmaus, have given rise. If the circumstances really were at all like what, in order to satisfy each separate narrative, the explana- tions suppose, the difficulty of imagining that the several writers would have written as they did, and that without any sign of their so writing elsewhere, seems almost over- THE UNITY OF THE GOSPELS. li whelming. The result of Mr McClellan's recent and ex- haustive discussion of the whole subject must be generally recognized as a distinct advance upon any previous attempt at reconciling the accounts of the several Evangelists. At the same time the extent to which his "expository summary" follows in the track of similar explanations and multiplies events, may be gathered from the single fact that he is obliged to suppose Mary Magdalene to make no fewer than six distinct visits to the Sepulchre1. The difficulties of verbal reconciliation are indeed met, and all the events might have happened as suggested, but the feeling unavoidably created is, if so many events really did take place, why in dealing with a subject of such infinite importance did not the Evangelists give some clearer intimation of them, or, as Strauss expresses his objection to all similar theories "How comes it, if combination be possible, that, of the entire series of occurrences, each Evangelist has selected for himself a separate portion"?2 Mr McClellan answers this inquiry by shewing how the different occurrences illustrate a proposition which he thus states : "The Resurrection of Christ, inexhaustible in its applications, has been designedly exhibited by the Evangel- ists, under special guidance of the Holy Spirit, in four distinct, principal, and comprehensive aspects, requiring just so many different selections from the known series of incidents3." i « Mary Magdalene... again, for the sixth time, proceeds to the Sepulchre." New Testament, vol. I. p. 534. 2 Life of Jesus. Part III. ch. IV. § 137. 3 New Testament, vol. I. p. 536. lii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. If, as an exceedingly humble inquirer into a science the very existence of which has yet to be proved, and of which, supposing it to exist, the very rudiments have yet to be learnt, I may express the conclusions to which the facts of the case so far as I can ascertain them seem to me to point, I should say that the weak point of the above answer is, that, whilst it recognizes what may be termed the pheno- mena of selection observable in the several narratives, it does so very inadequately, and that it entirely ignores their influence upon the far more marked and predominant phe- nomena of construction. If any one will be at the pains to note carefully the subdivisions of the general narrative, as given in the annexed arrangement of the Gospels, in the case both of our Lord's trial before Pilate, and in that of the Resurrection, and will then compare these narratives with others not so subdivided, he will find that the same method of construction runs throughout them all; whilst, if he will carry his examination a step further, he will find that it continually extends even to the construction of parallel verses, and this to such an extent that it is hardly an exaggeration to say that parallel verses often present a perfect microcosm of parallel narratives, just as parallel narratives afford a microcosm, more or less complete, of the parallel records of the Gospels regarded as a whole. If we simply apply to the History of the Resurrection the laws or rules which appear to be established by the continual recurrence of the above phenomena we shall find that the several component elements of the whole narrative, like so many substances resolved by some ascertained chemical process, at once fall apart, and are then capable of THE UNITY OF THE GOSPELS. liii being recombined on a definite principle in an entirely new and unlooked-for form. The beauty, force, and minute truthfulness of each separate record remains unimpaired. Each is complete in itself and yet absolutely consistent with the composite narrative. The separate narratives repre- sent in fact four distinct pictures, all exceedingly beautiful but all combining to form one more complete picture, which may in some sense be said to be an entirely new one, and which in beauty far surpasses each of those which combine to create it. Nor is this result arrived at by arguments, which may be controverted, or by conjectures, which many may think erroneous. Long before he has come to this point in the Gospel story, the Student will have become so perfectly familiar with the ascertained principles, which he has to apply, that he will realize the force both of the separate and of the combined records much as a musician might realize the beauty of each of the component parts of a piece of music, and see at once the harmony which would necessarily result from their combination. The truth of what is thus stated may be seen at once by reference to the actual text of the narrative as given on PP- 450—464- To attempt to comment on an arrangement so simple would only seem to rob of its chief force the statement that, when regarded in the light of certain fixed and ascertainable principles, the Gospel text is absolutely independent ot explanation. The many objects which such an arrangement of the component elements of the complete narrative may be designed to subserve may be illustrated by the single liv GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. example of the manner in which in the narrative we are deal- ing with the exceptional character both of the love and of the reward of Mary of Magdala is, without any distinct statement about it, made so singularly conspicuous. Immediately after the Burial of Christ, Mary of Magdala is found with only one companion remaining by the Sepulchre. Late on the Sabbath Day, she is the only one who again goes to visit the Sepulchre. On the Sabbath Evening, her previous visit to the Sepulchre does not prevent her joining those who went to "buy" spices " that they might come and anoint Him." On the Resurrection Morning she is the earliest astir of all, being the only one who comes " before dawn'" to the Sepulchre. After the command given by the Angels to all the women alike, she is one of two who alone have a love sufficiently strong to overcome their terror, and to enable them to go at once and do as they were bidden. When Peter and John run to the Sepulchre, she is distinguished even from James' Mary by alone following them. When Peter and John leave the Sepulchre, she is again distinguished from them by still herself remaining on the spot. Finally, as a reward for her exceptional devotion she is distinguished from and above all by being "the first" to whom Christ appeared, and with whom He conversed. If any one is inclined to doubt whether so absolutely simple a narrative can be the designed and complete record of the events of that first Easter morning, he may find an THE UNITY OF THE GOSPELS. Iv indirect, but very certain proof, in the words which S. Luke quotes as spoken by the two disciples journeying to Emmaus. For, unless the events happened exactly as this record indicates, it is well-nigh impossible to imagine how their words could be literally true, viz. that they had gained their information from certain women, who though they had seen a vision of Angels, had not seen Christ Himself. Whilst venturing to make the above suggestions with reference to a single portion of the Gospel narrative, I need hardly say that I do not claim to prove anything by a single illustrative example of this kind. My sole object in adducing what I conceive to be such self-evidencing facts as the above, is to try and weaken the force of any and every assumption which militates against the inviolable accuracy of the Gospels and the belief that when sufficiently examined they may be found to exhibit the most perfect Unity both of design and execution. Supposing this belief once admitted to be, I will not even say probable, but merely possible, and it will be apparent that there may and probably do exist the most absolutely certain means of demonstrating the existence of any serious error in the Gospels, which may be due to some corruption of the original text, and so in turn of doing that which, so long as such error remained undiscovered, might be universally recognized as impossible, viz. to prove that " the actual order of events in the Gospels is a matter of demonstration and not of conjecture." 2. The proposition will be found to represent a via media, or compromise, between the two directly opposite opinions whicJi theologians have held on the subject. Thus on the one hand, we have the opinion — as expressed- Ivi GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. by the Archbishop of York in his Introduction to the Speakers Commentary — of those who believe that though the Gospels are mainly chronological, yet that "the Evangelists have not so treated their subject that the construction of a complete harmony is possible." On the other hand, we have the opinion — as expressed by Professor Westcott in his Introduction to the Study of the Gospels — of those who hold that the "real harmony" of the Gospels is " essentially moral, and not mechanical," " not to be found in an ingenious mosaic composed of their dis- jointed fragments, but in the contemplation of each narrative from its proper point of sight." Having regard to the vast number of persons whose views these two diametrically opposite opinions represent, it is obvious that both experience and probability would alike point to some ' compromise ' as the logical resultant of such opposing forces, a compromise which should at once shew the truth to be partly with one side and partly with the other. 3. A perfectly sufficient cause exists, not only to account for the opinion that the Gospels are more or less unchrono- logical in their arrangement, but, supposing that opinion to be erroneous, to account for the error remaining long undiscovered. The opinion is traditional. But traditions, though descending from times when the means of forming con- clusions on critical subjects were far more limited than in the present day, are seldom received with the caution which they ought to be, especially when there appears to be the strongest prima facie ground for supposing a particular tradition to be correct. THE UNITY OF THE GOSPELS. lvii To account for this preeminently conservative influence of tradition, we must remember that, even when erroneous, it still for the most part represents the misconception or misapplication of some really existing fact ; and so generally has about it just that appearance of truthfulness which leads to its being adopted, if not without question, at least without the exhaustive testing of the truth of what it asserts to which it would otherwise be subjected. The substratum of truth contained in the tradition which affects the present question is that in the Gospels there exists a certain amount of unchronological arrangement ; whilst the misconception based upon it is that this unchro- nological arrangement is distributed over all the Gospels instead of being, without any exception worthy of note,, concentrated upon a portion of one of them. Supposing this view of the matter to be correct, we see at once that, in this traditional belief in the unhistorical order of the Gospels, we have the exact conditions fulfilled, which are almost universally found to prevail in cases where any long accepted opinion has at last proved to be nothing more or less than a 'popular error.' Thus it may well have happened that, by the mere force of this tradition, men have been led to commence their study of the Gospels upon an assumption which, from the nature of the case, absolutely precluded the possibility of their discovering the error of that assumption. Taking for granted that no means were at his disposal for ascer- taining with certainty the real order of events, the would- be Harmonist has at once cast about to see what transpo- sitions were necessary to bring the several narratives into at least approximate agreement; the result being that the Iviii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. very first transposition — which necessarily required others to be made to support it — made it once for all impossible that he should perceive, or even suspect, the erroneousness of the basis on which he had commenced his work. Thus, under the treatment adopted, the stately intricacy of the original design of the text, difficult to unravel before and probably designed to be difficult, became inextricable confusion; and a "mosaic of disjointed fragments" or a series of what Strauss terms mere " historical conjectures," exhibiting more or less of an approximation to the truth, according as the spirit of the inspired narrative had been caught, was the utmost that could be hoped for as the result of the most painstaking endeavours. But even supposing that any one did commence his study of the Gospels with a sufficient doubt of the cor- rectness of this traditional belief in their want of historical accuracy to induce him to try and test it, he would, until very recently, have been met at the outset of his work with difficulties which would be exceedingly likely to induce him, as it has induced multitudes before him, to abandon the attempt in despair. Without the aid which modern criticism has provided in such rich profusion, facts, which ultimately become the most potent factors in his work of investigation, would not only escape him, but the erroneous influences based upon their previous misconception would continue to mislead him as they had misled others. Without such works, for instance, as those of Dr Scrivener, or of Professors Westcott and Hort by his side, and without the confidence which the infinite labour and research bestowed upon them gave him as to the balance of evidence in favour of particular readings THE UNITY OF THE GOSPELS. lix of the text, his very striving after accuracy would only prevent his taking for granted that a reading which suited his purpose was really the right one ; the mere fact that it did so suit his purpose naturally making him suspicious of its being due to some harmonizing tendency in an early copyist. Thus, let him feel obliged to accept the usually received reading in Luke iv. 44, "He preached in the synagogues of Galilee" instead of the reading adopted, solely on the ground of overwhelming manuscript evidence, by Professors Westcott and Hort, " He preached in the synagogues of Judcea ", and he would (1) lose one of the earliest evidences of the supplementary relation in which he would afterwards find S. Luke's narrative so perpetually standing to those of the other Evangelists ; (2) he would be met by an utter impossibility of reconciling the several records with which he has to deal ; (3) he would be deprived of the only certain evidence of the perfect consistency between the several accounts of the calling of the first four disciples ; and (4) he would be unable to see any satisfactory answer to the difficul- ties suggested by sceptical writers with regard to the circum- stances which immediately preceded our Lord's first departure from Capernaum. In the absence of the aid which modern criticism and research thus afford, a mere passing doubt of the truth of this traditional belief in the chronological inaccuracy of the Gospels might indeed have suggested itself to one and another, but could scarcely have sufficed to induce a student to persevere long enough in any investigation on which he might enter to change the doubt of its truth into the certainty of its untruth. lx GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. For simple as the chronological problem afforded by the Gospels seems, when the method of its solution once becomes apparent, and easy as it is then to lay down a rule which any school-boy can follow — "Except in such and such cases and for such and such reasons never transpose a single verse of any of the Gospels, and remember that there is, save in these exceptional cases, always a way, and generally only one way, of reading parallel passages without transposing them and without making them involve some evident contradiction," — still the difficulties to be overcome before this point can be arrived at are of a kind which involve, not indeed any peculiar aptitude for critical study, still less any greater amount of information than is common even to the rank and file of the clergy, but so large an amount and variety of careful work, leading necessarily until the very last to little tangible result, that no one, who had not a sufficient doubt of the tradition to induce him to commence his work with the distinct intention of carrying it on to the end, and of ascertaining exactly upon what basis of fact the tradition rested, and, if it was true, what was the precise measure of its truth, would be at all likely to carry it on until he reached the point from which alone the real facts of the case would at once stand out plainly revealed. Under these circumstances it may easily have happened that the chronological problem presented by the Gospels as they now stand has really only remained unsolved partly because of the implicit acceptance of this traditional belief in its not admitting of complete solution, and partly because, without the light which modern students, not consciously working for this end, have yet thrown upon details upon which its solution turns, no one was likely to have a doubt THE UNITY OF THE GOSPELS. lxi of the truth of the old tradition sufficiently strong to lead him to test it at all, and still less a doubt strong enough to lead him beyond what would have appeared insurmount- able difficulties. But with the results of modern criticism and research, accessible to all, the whole aspect of the case was altered. This opposing fabric of tradition being undermined at every point, the time could not be long delayed when some one would observe the tendency of the work done ready to his hand, and speedily effect the mere mechanical task of adjusting the lever of revised facts in such a way as once for all to upset its hardly retained equilibrium. 4. Coincident with the tradition thus tending to discourage exhaustive inquiry there have always existed two causes of complication in the Gospel narratives which, though they i??ipe- ratively demanded such ifiquiry, were nevertheless, because of this tradition, not likely to be recognized as denianding it. The first and most obvious complication arises from the peculiar method of construction adopted by S. Matthew, especially in the earlier part of his Gospel ; a method the more perplexing because — supposing the contention of this volume, viz. that S. Mark, S. Luke and S. John all agree in their chronology, to be true — it involves a constant transi- tion from a strictly chronological to a wholly unchrono- logical arrangement of incidents, or because, in other words, he illustrates the oral teaching of our Lord, which it was his primary object to set forth, sometimes by a single incident, — which happened perhaps a year before or perhaps a year after the discourse which it is used to illustrate, and which is chosen only for its doctrinal significance, — and some- times by a group of incidents all given in their right order h. g. / Ixii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. relatively to each other, but not in their right order relatively to the rest of the ministry. For instance, being desirous of giving the greatest possible prominence to the Sermon on the Mount, and that by placing it in the very forefront of his Gospel, S. Matthew summarizes the events of the two years which preceded it in nine verses, these verses being again divided into three separate summaries ; the first dealing generally with the whole of the early part of that period ; the second dealing specifically with one subject, and combining the account of the first meeting of Christ with the four Disciples after leaving Nazareth with His call of the same Disciples on His second departure from Capernaum six months later ; and the third embracing in three verses the whole history of the next twelve months as well as the general result of the work of the whole two years. Then, having recorded the Sermon on the Mount, he uses not all, but a certain number of the incidents designedly excluded from the former sum- maries, for the purpose of illustrating its teaching, but in doing this reverses the real order of incidents, and uses single incidents or groups of incidents just as his subject requires. Nor is the second section of S. Matthew's Gospel, from our present point of view, one whit less perplexing. The first choice of the twelve Apostles, which took place before the Sermon on the Mount, is combined with their first despatch on an independent mission, which took place many months after it, whilst very much that was spoken at an alto- gether later date is incorporated with the oral teaching of that occasion. At the same time, with regard to the inci- dents mentioned immediately after these discourses, what happened after the later is recorded before what happened THE UNITY OF THE GOSPELS. lxiii after the earlier event, whilst these records are followed by incidents excluded from the earliest summaries ; these again being immediately followed, and that without any apparent want of connexion, by incidents separated from them by an interval to be measured by years, and connected, not by any chronological tie, but by their appropriateness for illustrating the unbelief and progressive hostility of the Pharisees. Thus we have only to make allowance for the entire absence of any means of determining with exactness where S. Matthew's order was, and where it was not, chronological, and to remember the influence which, from its standing first, his Gospel was likely to exercise upon every attempt to ascertain the actual sequence of events, and we shall see at once how many elements of difficulty his method of writing involved, and yet how likely they were to remain unsuspected so long as no such key to this method, as I hope to prove S. Luke's Gospel originally afforded, was available. An historical outline suggested by S. Matthew and filled in from the other Gospels could not under these circumstances possibly do otherwise than give an entirely erroneous view of the Gospel narrative as a whole, and involve the very contradictions which have brought Harmonies into such grave disrepute. The second cause of complication is to be found in the fact already alluded to, viz. that a considerable section of S. Luke's Gospel is the scene of an entirely abnormal arrangement of incidents, the unanimous testimony of the other Evangelists shewing that ch. viii. 22 — xi. 13 requires to be read after xi. 14 — xiii. 21. Without attempting at present to go into the details of this cause of complication, it may suffice to point out that, lxiv GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. though the two parts of this section thus practically stand transposed, the order of the incidents peculiar to each section is, as everywhere else in S. Luke, in what would appear to be exact chronological order, though this fact, as well as the necessity for reading the second before the first part of the whole section, is greatly obscured both by the large amount of matter peculiar to S. Luke which the section contains, and by the same cause in the parallel sections of S. Matthew and S. Mark. Assuming the facts to be as here stated, we shall see at once that so hopelessly abnormal an arrangement was not likely even to be suspected, much less made due allowance for, until its existence was revealed by such an exhaustive inquiry as we have shown was not generally thought to be necessary. At the same time, so long as its existence remained unsuspected or undiscovered, the task of adjusting the Gospels to each other, and that without any transposition which would impugn the accuracy of either Evangelist, was bound to remain an altogether impossible one. 5. All attempts hitherto made to harmo7iize the Gospels, inasmuch as they have invariably proceeded upon the tra- ditional belief of their being at least to a certai?i extent inexact, have involved alterations of the text, the assumed necessity for which has seemed to many to militate against any adequate conception of their Inspiration and consequently against their supreme claim to universal acceptance. On the very threshold of his work any student attempting the task of harmonizing the Gospels perceives it to be absolutely certain that, in order to reduce the four narratives into one connected whole, a certain number of incidents recorded must be transposed from the order which one or THE UNITY OF THE GOSPELS. lxv other narrative assigns to them ; and, as no principle upon which such transpositions should be made is apparent, he assumes, mainly on the faith of the tradition we have been considering, that no such principle is ascertainable. Hence he necessarily regards the making such alterations as seem most certainly to be required as the proper commencement of his work. But before he can make these alterations he is obliged, in the absence of any clearly denned principle upon which he can proceed, to formulate for himself certain theories as to an order of events, which is no longer to be the Gospel order, but one carefully elaborated from his own consciousness, and depending entirely upon his power of doing what is in its nature impossible, viz. so to balance conflicting evidence as to- arrive at a satisfactory decision as to .the facts on which it bears. Having thus in the first instance formulated for himself certain guiding theories, the Harmonist proceeds to the work of deducing from them his facts ; the more usual process of marshalling all his facts and from them de- ducing his theories being, he assumes, impossible. The inevitable result of this process is that he is finally led on to conclusions, arrived at by infinite labour but all depending upon a complicated series of "historical conjectures," even the proximate accuracy or inaccuracy of which it must be impossible to test, but the inaccuracy of any one of which must be more or less fatal to the whole super- structure raised on, or in any way depending upon them. Thus, if the general result of his labours satisfies himself, it is the utmost that the Harmonist can expect; the hope that any considerable number of persons should take the same lxvi GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. view on such an infinite variety of topics, on all of which the evidence is more or less conflicting, being out of the question. But practical failure in the task attempted is not the only result of efforts thus commencing, instead of ending, with alterations. A very few merely arbitrary emendations of the original text are quite sufficient not only to increase the original obscurity in which the real order of events was involved, but so strongly to accentuate previously existing difficulties, that the wonder is, not that so many have had their faith in the Gospels shaken by the obvious failure of these strivings after harmony, but that so many have pre- served it intact. That this view of the case is by no means an exagge- rated one is to a great extent shewn by the strong reaction which has of late years set in against attempts to harmonize the Gospels — attempts as to the legitimacy and praise- worthiness of which it was at one time impossible to say that two opinions existed. Yet no one who really considers the case can doubt that this reaction is perfectly natural. Not to assume the truth of the general statements just made as to the way in which Harmonies have been con- structed, and the effects which such a method of proceeding is sure to produce, let us take two instances, which admit of being shortly stated, of the way in which the process of harmonizing is found to be worked out, when a prolific writer like Mr Greswell allows us to trace it. One of Mr Greswell's theories requires that the whole of a portion of S. Luke's narrative should refer not to a visit to Jerusalem but to Galilee. He therefore proceeds, THE UNITY OF THE GOSPELS, lxvii wholly undismayed by the difficulty of his task, to prove that when S. Luke says of our Lord 'He stedfastly set His face to go to Jerusalem ' he does not mean that He really proceeded at once to go in the direction indicated, but that, using a well-recognized method of speech, He was denning the purpose not the direction of the journey, and meant to say that Jerusalem was our Lord's ultimate desti?iatio?i, and that He was at the time really journeying northwards to Galilee, not southwards to Jerusalem1. Again, when a similar contradiction to his theory con- fronts him in the record of our Lord's visit to the house of Martha and Mary, he is able to find reasons which con- vince him that, Lazarus as well as Martha and Mary certainly resided in Galilee, and that it was " a very ancient and very general mistake" which "confounded" the village of Martha and Mary with Bethany2. Or to take an illustration from probably the best of quite recently issued Harmonies, that put forth by the Christian Knowledge Society. The first transposition we come to will serve our purpose perfectly, as exhibiting in a singularly striking manner the constantly recurring effect, not so much of forced interpretations of words, as of the merely arbitrary alterations of the text, which are supposed to be necessary to bring two or more of the Gospels into agreement. S. Matthew says that our Lord did certain things after leaving Nazareth • the Harmony in question assumes that the Evangelist must have meant before He went to Nazareth, and accordingly transposes the narrative so as to give it 1 Greswell's Dissertation^ vol. II. p. 527. - Ibid. p. 545. lxviii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. this meaning, printing Matt. iv. 17 before Matt. iv. 13 — 16. It does not need any very cultivated intelligence to see that, of transpositions made in the same arbitrary manner as the above, a very large proportion do in reality involve, directly or indirectly, a distinct impeachment of the veracity of one or other of the Evangelists. When therefore we remember that in ordinary Harmonies such transpositions as the above are almost indefinitely multiplied, we can hardly wonder that in recent times a strong reaction should have set in against them, and that many of those who have the most implicit faith in the truthfulness of the Gospels should have come to think that such strivings after harmony only keep the armoury of scepticism constantly supplied with fresh weapons of offence, and really exaggerate the very difficulties, which they are intended to remove ? 6. But, on the other hand, the opinion which assumes the work of the Harmonist to be unnecessary, and even harmful, and declares the order of arrangement in the Gospels to be essentially ' moral and not mechanical] is in itself so greatly opposed to what most persons would consider the obvious in- tention of the several Evangelists, that its being put forward niust necessarily be regarded by the sceptic as a virtual co?i- fession of defeat on the part of his opponents. That the opinion which seeks to substitute a 'moral' for a ' mechanical ' order is categorically true of a certain part of S. Matthew's Gospel, and that it is so far true with regard to the other Gospels that it recognizes a principle which, though not to the exclusion of chronological order, does in fact pervade their whole method of construction, dictating what shall be omitted and what inserted in each Gospel, THE UNITY OF THE GOSPELS. lxix may be readily admitted. But what we would contend is, that, whilst this opinion recognizes one part of the truth, it denies another and equally important part, inasmuch as the ' moral order ' on the one hand and ' the mechanical ' or chronological order on the other may, and in fact do, save only in part of S. Matthew's narrative, coexist in the Gospels, and cannot therefore be rightly dealt with as alternative or antagonistic systems. We should rather put the matter in this way, ' moral or logical ' order = the order of Supreme Fitness = the order which was according to the determinate counsel and fore- knowledge of God = the order in which the events really took place = the historical and chronological order = the ' mechanical ' order. That the moral order is in fact identical with the histori- cal order is a truth which admits of illustration limited only by the recorded facts of the Gospels. From the Incarnation to the Ascension, from the beginning of miracles on a third day at a marriage feast at Cana, when the Redeemer's glory was first manifested forth, to the crowning miracle at the grave of Lazarus, when, again on the third day, Christ was "perfected," there is the same unvarying and un- questionable evidence of this order of Supreme Fitness being coexistent, and advancing pari passu, with the actually recorded history. Nay, so strikingly is this very often the case that the evident ' moral order ' will often throw light upon and lead us first to suspect any error which may have obscured the conception of the historical order. For instance The words " My Father worketh hitherto and I work," regarded as an opening Manifesto, spoken at the commence- lxx GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. merit of our Lord's public Ministry, and at a Feast to be so ever memorable in the annals of the Church as that of Pentecost, have a " Supreme Fitness " which is altogether lacking when we are asked to suppose that they were spoken at a later period and at the Feast of Purim ; their very appropriateness in the one case, and the absence of any peculiar appropriateness in the other, thus first sug- gesting that, in the much debated question as to this unnamed Feast of S. John v. i., Chrysostom, and the earlier authorities generally, must be right and modern opinion wrong. And as it is with questions of historical order, so is it also and in equally marked degree with reference to ques- tions of interpretation. There is perhaps no passage in the Gospels the tra- ditional and accepted interpretation of which has been so generally regarded, to use the words of Archbishop Trench1, as "forced," "artificial" and "unreal" as that of our Lord's conversation with the Disciples at the Well of Samaria ; but the moment we ask ourselves the question ' What at this particular juncture — when the result of His preaching to the Gentile Samaritans was brought into such sharp con- trast with the result of His preaching to the Jews — should we expect our Lord to insist upon, to the entire exclusion of any other thought?' then we see that the opening words of his address, " I have meat to eat that ye know not of," are, though in a very different way from that which Arch- bishop Trench suggests, really the key-note, not of a part only, but of the whole, of his after-discourse, and that, in interpreting the latter part of it, commentators who have 1 Studies on the Gospels, p. 131. THE UNITY OF THE GOSPELS. lxxi been so severe upon the Disciples for their dulness in giving a material significance to words intended to be understood in a spiritual sense, have fallen into a similar mistake them- selves by giving a spiritual significance to words intended to be taken in a material sense, and in not perceiving (i) that in the words ' for in this,' sc. bread (not ' for herein '), a contrast is commenced between the material bread for which Christ had 'sent' His disciples, and that 'meat which they knew not of; (2) that the material bread represented the result of other men's labours of which the Disciples were taking advantage ; and (3) that Christ Himself was both the sower and the reaper, rejoicing in both capacities 'at one and the same time ' (6/xov) — and not, as in the case of material bread, after an interval of four months — and re- ceiving already, as the result of His Ministry to those Samaritan strangers, an earnest of that reward which should be more fully His when " Gentiles should come to His light and kings to the brightness of His rising." But whilst it may well be granted that it is of the deepest moment that we should thus recognize a truth so interwoven in the whole texture of the Gospels as that which tells us that there is a 'moral order' in the events as related both in the Gospels regarded as a whole, and as related by each Evangelist separately, we may fairly argue, that we rather weaken than confirm our sense of its importance by assuming a possible and even probable want of identity between this moral order on the one hand and the mechanical or chronological order on the other. The evidence that throughout the Gospels an historical order has been designedly followed, as the rule and not the lxxii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. exception, is so unmistakeable, and withal is so much more apparent than, from the nature of the case, the evidence of a moral order can be, that the mere proposition to substi- tute the latter for the former can only induce many to suspect the reality and existence of the order thus sub- stituted. They feel that they are entitled by the wording of the Gospels themselves to insist, as a first requirement to their reception of them, that they make good that which, in their opinion, they distinctly claim, viz. His- torical accuracy. Thus they take their stand on ground which they hold themselves to be fully justified in occu- pying, and, feeling their position to be impregnable, they refuse to be drawn from it. At the same time, to on-lookers the mere abandonment of the claim for historical order so long and so stoutly con- tended for, and the falling back upon an order which, how- ever really existing, is susceptible of no universally accepted tests, seems to fall little short of an acknowledgment of defeat. Such are some of the considerations which I would venture to suggest are calculated greatly to increase the antecedent probability inherent in the proposition which we are considering, and which at least fairly balance, if they do not outweigh, the antecedent incredibility which at first sight may appear to attach to it. After all, grant the proposition true, and what follows ? Simply this ; that it is not the first time, and doubtless will not be the last, that we shall have to confess that our misunderstanding of Holy Scripture has been due, not to the absence of facts requisite to its elucidation, but to THE UNITY OF THE GOSPELS. lxxiii our own want of appreciation of those facts, a want of appreciation only too aptly illustrating our constant for- getfulness of the abiding truth enshrined in the quaint words of an old Poet1: — "Yet all these were, when no man did them know; Yet have from wisest ages hidden beene; And later times thinges more unknowne shall show. Why then should witlesse man so much misweene. That nothing is, but that which he hath seen." 1 Spenser, Faery Queette, Introd. to Book n. CHAPTER II. THE DISPLACED SECTION OF S. LUKE. The mere assertion that all the four Gospels can be brought into perfect accord by the rectification of a single error in one of them, implies that this error must be of a highly exceptional character, and that from the circum- stances of the case — there being three correct narratives by which to test the one supposed to have been tampered with — it must be possible to produce an amount of evidence, shewing that the error either was or was not made, which shall be overwhelmingly strong. The motive for the supposed displacement of the text was, as will be shewn, to avoid an appearance of contradiction between S. Mark and S. Luke, an object which would be at once attained by taking what now stands as Luke xi. 14 — xiii. 21 out of its original position before Luke viii. 22 (see Table, p. xiv.), and inserting it, as a sort of Appendix, after what was probably regarded as the end of the Gali- laean Ministry, i.e. after what now stands as Luke viii. 22 — xi.— 13. It may be well to mention here parenthetically that the idea of S. Luke's Gospel having consisted of three parts, the THE DISPLACED SECTION OF S. LUKE. lxxv first part ending with the Galilaean Ministry, and the second consisting of an appendix to the first, was suggested many- years ago, so that, supposing it should be possible to prove the real nature of the original error, it would be interesting to note how closely students have for years been as it were upon its track. In his Ordo Seeclorum (p. 638) Mr Brown says, "I regard this portion of S. Luke's Gospel — Luke xi. 1 — xviii. 14 — in the light of an appendix, or episode, in which, at the close of the detailed history of the ministry in Galilee, the Evange- list brings together a number of incidents, conversations, and discourses, some perhaps belonging to the time of that journey, others certai?ily to earlier occasions, connected how- ever throughout by a unity of purpose, which seems to consist in a prevailing allusion, symbolical or prophetical, to the mystery of the rejection of Israel and the calling of the Gentiles." Now if for Luke xi. 1 — xviii. 14 Mr Brown had written Luke xi. 14 — xiii. 21, his suggestion would simply be that S. Luke had himself designedly done that, which our con- tention is has indeed demonstrably been done by some one, but which must have been done either by a copyist or by revisers, inasmuch as, for reasons which will be stated, it could not by any possibility have been done by S. Luke himself. It may also be well here to remind the reader of the fact, that no portion of the Gospel history has given rise to anything like the number and variety of 'theories' which have been suggested in explanation of the difficulties and contradictions, which this part of S. Luke's Gospel, as it stands now, admittedly involves. lxxvi GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. The extent to which this statement is true may be illustrated by the single fact, that one of the most recent and exhaustive critical commentaries on the Gospels, that of Mr Mc Clellan, discusses no fewer than ten chief 'schemes,' all supported by many honoured names, by which it has been thought that one only out of many 'groups' of these 'difficulties' may be, if not disposed of, at least minimized. One other consideration, tending to shew the prima facie probability of the existence of some fundamental error in the text not attributable to S. Luke himself, may also be fairly adduced, viz. this, that, save in the portion of his Gospel affected by the error suggested, S. Luke is in absolute and uniform accord with S. Mark and S. John, the uniformity stopping at Luke viii. 21 and recommencing at Luke xiii. 22, the exact limits within which the two sections in question are comprised. On the other hand, it is an equally demonstrable fact, that, the suggested errOr being corrected, the section of S. Luke's Gospel which lies between these points no longer proves any exception to this otherwise invariable agreement. Or, to put the same fact somewhat differently, let the supposed displacement be corrected, and not only do all difficulties in S. Luke disappear, but his own express declaration as to an 'order' — presumably chronological order — being the main characteristic of his Gospel, is found to be exactly and literally fulfilled; whilst his design of testifying to the "truthfulness of the Gospels" in which Theophilus was instructed becomes no less conspicuous. But, however desirable the correction of the suggested error may thus seem to be, we have still to bear in mind the very startling fact, that the correction must affect, not only THE DISPLACED SECTION OF S. LUKE. lxxvii about one-fourth of the whole of S. Luke's Gospel, but, directly or indirectly, considerably more than half of the Gospels of S. Matthew and S. Mark; whilst the effect which it produces on S. John's Gospel, though not so wide reaching, is scarcely less important. Under these circumstances let us try to imagine what would be an amount of evidence which would be sufficient to leave no reasonable room for doubt, in the mind of any impartial critic, as to the certainty of the error having been made, and the consequent necessity for rectifying it, and then see whether, or how far, such evidence is really forth- coming. Let it then be required to prove i. That the text affected by the displacement is, as it now stands, a falsification of S. Luke's promise to write 1 in order,' and that it constitutes the only exception to his fulfilment of this promise. 2. That, according to a literal interpretation of his preface, S. Luke proposes to write ' in order ' for the special purpose of clearing up certain apparent inaccuracies in those Gospels in which Theophilus had been instructed, presumably those of S. Matthew, S. Mark, and S. John, and that this purpose is exactly fulfilled throughout the greater part of his Gospel, and would be fulfilled by the whole of it were this displacement rectified. 3. That, by the received arrangement of his text, S. Luke is made to contradict himself. 4. That a sufficient cause to account for the alleged displacement is to be found in the flagrant contradiction which S. Luke's text, as ex hypothesi it originally stood, would at first sight appear to present to that of S. Mark. H. G. g lxxviii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. 5. That the postponement of what now stands as Luke xi. 14 — xiii. 21, would have been further recommended by its having the effect of preventing an appeara?ice (a) of another supposed contradiction between S. Luke and the other Evangelists, and {b) of a meaningless repetition in S. Luke's own Gospel. 6. That, the displacement once made, the advantages of the fresh arrangement of the text would be so much more obvious than the contradictions it entailed, that MSS. con- taining the original arrangement would be very quickly discredited. 7. That, from the nature of the case, there being three other pictures with which to compare the one sup- posed to have been tampered with, absolutely conclusive evidence — especially with regard to the present as compared with the original order of events at the several points where the narrative must have been disconnected and reunited — would be forthcoming, and that this evidence would neces- sarily be as conspicuously absent in the case of the wrong as it would be conspicuously present in the case of the right order. 8. That, though the main principle of construction, which suggests and requires the correction contended for, is, as S. Luke's text now stands, only a matter of deduction and inference, yet, as soon as his Text is placed in what is claimed to have been its original order, this principle is at once seen to be identical with the guiding principle indicated in his Preface. 9. That the correctness of the principles of construction which suggest and require the alteration contended for is testified by the fact that, when the alteration is made, it THE DISPLACED SECTION OF S. LUKE, lxxix becomes apparent that, with two or three very minor exceptions, the order of events given by S. Luke is identical with that given by S. Mark, and that we are thus enabled on the testimony of two witnesses, both being Evangelists, to perceive exactly in what instances S. Matthew has departed from a strictly chronological order, and so to ascertain the exact plan upon which his Gospel is written. 10. That the correctness of the principles of con- struction which suggest and require the particular trans- position contended for is testified by the fact that when applied to the general arrangement of the Four Gospels they at once shew them to be in perfect accord and thus produce the result which Harmonists have so long striven after but have confessedly failed to arrive at. ii. That, whereas the revision of S. Luke's text required to rectify the alleged displacement is of so unusual and drastic a character, that, if no such displacement had taken place, it would necessarily serve greatly to increase any previous difficulty in reconciling the several narratives, it does as a matter of fact entirely remove that difficulty and results in our being able to form a continuous narrative, which at once commends itself to our judgement as certainly true, and at the same time altogether removes those special difficulties which have given rise to the greatest amount of controversy. 12. That the revised order of S. Luke's Text brings out into bold relief the most emphatic evidence which his Gospel contains of the Divinity of our Lord, and reveals a remarkable coincidence of testimony on this subject between his Gospel and that of S. John. .?2 lxxx GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. In spite of the formality of such an enumeration of evi- dences as the above, I have thought it best to try to shew, as it were at a glance, how singularly strong is the cumula- tive force of the proofs thus indicated. I do not think — but it is an opinion not difficult to test — that any judge in a court of law would hesitate to direct a jury that the above points, supposing all, or the majority of them, to be established to their satisfaction, amounted to absolute and incontrovertible evidence of fact; evidence even stronger than under all the circumstances could perhaps be reasonably expected. Let us then proceed to our proofs. i. Required to prove — That the text affected by the proposed transposition is, as it now stands, a falsification of S. Luke's promise to write 'in order,' and that it constitutes the only exception to the fulfilment of this promise. Here we are met at once by what I conceive to be one of the very many curious and deeply important effects of the error which has to be proved. Assuming for a moment the existence of this error, it will be seen that, by throwing S. Luke's Gospel altogether out of its original order, it entirely altered its designed rela- tion to the other Gospels ; and further, that this relation being of the very essence of the whole plan of his Gospel, S. Luke's Preface, or definition of his plan, did not, from the moment the error was made, admit of being either understood or translated literally. THE DISPLACED SECTION OF S. LUKE, lxxxi S. Luke's Gospel standing as it does now, a literal acceptance of the obvious meaning of the Preface at once ranges the promise and the performance of S. Luke in direct antagonism; whilst the definition of the object of his writing ' in order ' becomes at once so obscured as to be absolutely unintelligible ; so much so that the best a translator can do is to take refuge in a vague generality, and make S. Luke speak of ' the certainty of the things,' instead of 'the truthfulness of the treatises or Gospels' (Aoywv), which, when he wrote, formed the subject of all formal catechetical instruction in the early Church — the fact that the word Aoyos is used in both S. Luke's ' Prefaces ' (see Acts i. i), presumably with the same meaning, being unavoidably ignored. But the moment the effect of rectifying the alleged dis- placement in his Gospel is perceived, the promise of the Preface stands, as it should do, interpreted, not contradicted, by that which it introduces. At the same time the full sig- nificance of the nicer shades of meaning attaching to the various words used in the Preface being no longer obscured by misconception as to the impression, which they were in- tended to convey, we are able at once to adopt so absolutely literal a translation as the following : " Forasmuch as many have attempted to arrange afresh a narrative of those things which were accomplished in our midst, even as they handed it over to us which were eye- witnesses and Ministers of The Word, it seemed good to me also, having followed the course of all things accurately from the first, to write to thee in order, most excellent Theophilus, that thou mightest know the truthfulness of the Gospels wherein thou wast instructed." lxxxii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. As it stands, S. Luke's Gospel is demonstrably not written in historical or chronological order: nay, so unhis- torical does its arrangement appear, that so acute a critic as Mr McCllellan, after putting forth " a conspectus shewing the organic structure and dogmatic connexion of S. Luke's Gospel," such conspectus proceeding on the same lines as similar ones suggested respectively by Professors Ebrard, Oosterzee and Westcott, concludes his argument with the words, "If our conspectus be only fundamentally correct the historical hypothesis is for ever destroyed." Nor are the opinions of modern writers of world-wide repute less emphatic as to the meaning of the actual word in S. Luke's Preface translated 'in order.' That it does not mean historical order they are convinced. But arguments based upon an unusual, though admissible meaning of a word, are always specially open to suspicion, and in the present case the fact may well have been, that to credit a writer with saying one thing, and then immediately proceeding to do another, has seemed such a manifest reductio ad absnrdwn, that there has existed a sort of logical necessity to interpret what S. Luke said by what he ap- peared to have done. Hence the natural wish to harmonize promise and per- formance was really father to the thought, which, but for the apparent contradiction between them, would probably never have been suggested. That this modern interpretation of the expression ' in order,' logical and uncontrovertible as it seemed, should always have been regarded by many as unsatisfactory was natural enough. Apart from its involving a very rare use of the original word, the context constitutes it a peculiarly THE DISPLACED SECTION OF S. LUKE, lxxxiii strained one; especially when it is observed that the 're- arrangement,' which many had unsuccessfully attempted, must presumably have been an historical one, and could not therefore have been corrected by an arrangement which proceeded on different lines, and which, if wanting in methodical order, was calculated to involve the real sequence of events in even greater uncertainty than before. On the other hand, directly we see that the performance of S. Luke does not in fact belie his promise, all need for any strained interpretation is removed. His Gospel is im- mediately seen to be the one in which, from beginning to end, there is no ambiguity of arrangement whatever, and which does not therefore require even a single 'literary adjustment' to bring it into exact accord with the other Gospels. Thus the promise, literally interpreted, leads directly to the promise literally fulfilled. That the fact is as here stated will be proved by the arrangement of the Four Gospels annexed, and by the entire absence from it of any transposition whatever of S. Luke's text, save the single one required to rectify the dis- placement in question. Required to prove — That, according to a literal interpretation of his Preface, S. Luke promises to write 'in order' for the purpose of clearing up certain apparent inaccuracies in those Gospels in which Theophilus had been instructed, presumably those of S. Matthew, S. Mark, and S. John, and that this purpose is exactly fulfilled throughout the greater part of his Gospel Ixxxiv GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. and would be fulfilled by the whole of it were this displace- ment rectified. S. Luke's object was to remove an uncertainty, or sus- picion of untruthfulness, which had affected certain Gospels (Ao'yoi) which, he states, had been handed over to the Church by those whose authority for writing them consisted in their having been either "eye-witnesses or ministers of the word;" this uncertainty, or suspicion, having been engendered by certain unsuccessful attempts which many had previously made to rearrange, or harmonize, these Gospels. That these Logoi were in fact the Gospels of S. Matthew, S. Mark, and S. John, we gather (i) from the use which S. Luke makes of the word Logos in his Preface to the Acts, where he styles his own Gospel a Logos, (2) from his definition of the writers, and (3) from the fact that, from the very commencement to the end of his Gospel, he traverses the same ground, and deals with the same incidents, as those Evangelists ; and that, not only in the same general order, but in such a manner as to elucidate on every oc- casion the meaning of such occasional departures from a chronological order of narration as the Gospel of S. Matthew continually, and of S. Mark on very rare occasions, exhibits. Whilst, with regard to detailed narratives, as, for instance, that of the Institution of the Last Supper and that of the scourging of Christ before His crucifixion, he invariably enables us to see the meaning of statements which, without his guidance, we should certainly misunderstand. Interpreted by its performance, the meaning of S. Luke's promise to Theophilus is simply this : "Accept my Gospel as absolutely and invariably true, THE DISPLACED SECTION OF S. LUKE, lxxxv and you will then find that there is only one way of under- standing the different methods which the other Evangelists adopt in relating various facts, and you will thus at once see the perfect truthfulness of the Gospels in which thou wast instructed." Holy Scripture is never apologetic, and there is therefore no such detailed explanation of apparent discrepancies as an ordinary writer would, under similar circumstances, have provided. There is simply a demand upon the faith of Theophilus accompanied by a filling up of gaps, which were in danger of being and probably had been filled up by apocryphal writers, and a restatement of facts, so far as such restatement was necessary, to shew that the witness of the former Evangelists did in reality, whatever 'many' might have said to the contrary, agree together. A certain amount of difficulty in reconciling the restate- ment of facts with the statements previously misunderstood did indeed still remain. But the difficulty was always of a kind which implicit belief in the truthfulness of all the narratives would speedily get over ; a fact which is con- spicuously illustrated in the case of the apparent contradic- tion which, according to our contention, led to the dis- placement of S. Luke's text which we are considering. But, again, appeal must be made to the annexed arrange- ment of the text of the Four Gospels for actual proof of the fact (i) that, on every occasion, without a single exception, where the smallest transposition of the text of either of the other Gospels is necessary, the transposition is one dictated and required by the rule of S. Luke's Preface understood as above ; and (2) that such transpositions, being due merely to a different plan of writing, are never lxxxvi GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. found to impugn, directly or indirectly, the exact accuracy of the writers. 3- Required to prove — That, by the received arrangement of his text, S. Luke is made to contradict himself. The whole of the section viii. 22 — xi. 13 belongs as manifestly to the close, as the section xi. 14 — xiii. 21 does to a much earlier portion, of our Lord's ministry. For instance in S. Luke ix. 5 1 we read " when the time was come that He should be received up, He stedfastly set His face to go to Jerusalem." This statement follows not only the account of the Trans- figuration, given by two other Evangelists as the fitting close of the Galilaean ministry, but also a reference to the decease which Christ should accomplish at Jerusalem. Thus the only impression which it can possibly be intended to convey — unless a very strained interpretation be put upon it — is that the beginning of the end had now arrived. But more than this, everything which is related in connexion with this statement tends to confirm the im- pression, which the words themselves convey, that the Galilaean ministry is past. Capernaum's time of trial is over, and her final doom placed on record. The contest with Satan has at length resulted in victory, and he is already beheld 'falling as lightning from Heaven.' Every discourse implies the nearness of the end. The Trans- figuration is spoken of as the immediate precursor of it. Christ's sufferings, His rejection, His death, and resurrection on the third day (Luke ix. 22), are so soon to be accom- THE DISPLACED SECTION OF S. LUKE, lxxxvii plished facts that the minds of the Disciples are now again and again prepared for them. The home at Capernaum was no longer available, for now the Son of man had not where to lay his head. The mission of the Seventy ,,with the instructions given to them, already contemplates a state of things altogether different from that which marks all the main portion of our Lord's personal ministry. The mighty works done in Chorazin, Bethsaida and Capernaum have been brought to an end, and are spoken of as having failed in their object. Finally, a visit to Bethany, and presumably to Jerusalem, mark the actual commencement of the first scene of the last act of the Divine Drama. In all this there can be no possible room for doubt that in this section, viii. 22 — xi. 13, S. Luke means his readers tO' understand that his history is rapidly approaching to its climax, and that he has entirely done with all those events which gradually led up to it. But what an utter and hopeless contradiction to all this is involved as we pass on, in reading the received text, to the section xi. 14 — xiii. 21. We are carried back in a moment to utterly different circumstances, different thoughts, different arguments, all of which tell us of the re-opening of a closed chapter of our Author's history. We don't want the evidence of three other writers to tell us this. They tell us no more than S. Luke tells us himself. For see what he does. He transports us at once to places and scenes, discourses and teaching, which could not possibly find their proper place after the point in the history to which, as the text now stands, he has conducted us. In section xi. 14 — xiii. 21 we are back at Capernaum; lxxxviii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. back amongst allusions which suppose the time of pro- bation for that city to be still present ; back amongst con- versations which suppose the death of Christ to be still an event altogether in the future ; back in the presence of the baptism of suffering thought of as yet far distant ; back at the parable of the fig-tree, with its manifest al- lusion to the whole year of patient and laborious teaching, which was yet to precede the end of the ministry; and finally back amongst parables belonging to a form of teaching which S. Luke himself in the beginning of Chapter vill., has identified with an earlier time. Apart from our actual knowledge of the facts of the case derived from the other Evangelists, when we thus examine the narrative of S. Luke by itself, we feel instinctively that we must be confronted with some mistaken arrangement of the text, which, even if it should prove unexplainable, we should feel an almost insuperable difficulty in attributing to the deliberate design of the writer himself. Required to prove — That a sufficient cause to account for the alleged dis- placement is to be found in the flagrant contradiction which S. Luke's text, as it originally stood, would, at first sight, appear to present to that of S. Mark. It is universally admitted, that of all the many causes which have led to alterations of the original text of the Gospels, none has been more fruitful of error than the desire on the part of copyists, and sometimes of revisers, to remove the appearance of contradiction between the several narra- THE DISPLACED SECTION OF S. LUKE, lxxxix tives. Whilst it is evident, that just in proportion as an alteration once made is plausible and apparently necessary, in that proportion it is likely to be repeated and perpetuated, until at last it may even come to be received as certainly the true reading. If this be so even when the existence of an alternative reading is known, and supported by the authority of many of the oldest MSS. — as in the case of Luke iv. 44, — how much more would it be true of any alteration which may have been made during what we may term the 'pre-historic' period, viz. that which preceded the date of the earliest MSS. and Versions which have come down to us. The tendency to harmonize, which is proved to have existed in later times, must have been, and we know was, just as potent during the several centuries which fail to provide any contemporary manuscript evidence of its handiwork. Thus, for instance, we find a disciple of Irenaeus, at the end of the second or very early in the third century, actually accusing his opponents not only of having tampered with the Holy Scriptures but of having published what they called 'corrected copies,' but which he consider- ed simply ruined1. It will thus be seen that the absence of MS. evidence does not seriously affect the probability of a pre-historic alteration having been made, provided the alteration is not only provable by sufficient internal evidence, but is of so manifestly plausible a character as to make it likely that, if made at all, it would have been made in the very earliest MSS. The difficulty which would naturally have suggested the 1 See Salmon's Introdtiction to the JVew Testament, p. 66. xc GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. displacement — supposing, as is almost certain to have been the case, that a particular passage of S. Mark was under- stood formerly as it is to this day — was apparently insur- mountable. S. Mark would be found describing what, in modern times, is usually called 'the Day of Teaching' — i.e. the Day of Teaching by Parables — and clearly stating, that the day ended by our Lord embarking to cross the Sea of Galilee, on the occasion of His stilling the tempest. But between his record of the (so-called) Day of Teaching and this embarkation, S. Luke would be found, as we suppose the text to have originally stood, to interpose a series of events and discourses which occupied at least one other day and that day a Sabbath, and which unless closely compared with the incidents related by S. Matthew and S. Mark would have appeared to have occupied a much longer period. A more flagrant contradiction between the two writers than would at first sight have appeared to be involved cannot be imagined. Moreover it was a contradiction which could not possibly be explained until the meaning of S. Luke's Preface was understood. Until that time — and we must remember that its meaning may then, as it necessarily was afterwards, have been unperceived — the appearance of so grave a contradiction had either to be acquiesced in, or else it was necessary to rectify it by some such apparently simple plan as that of postponing the offending section, and bringing S. Luke's account of the 'embarkation' into the same relative position with regard to the Parable of the Sower and the (so-called) Day of Teaching as it occupied in S. Mark. Assuredly when a choice had to be made between these THE DISPLACED SECTION OF S. LUKE, xci alternatives, the maxim 'Between two evils choose the least' was extremely likely sooner or later to be acted upon. Nor in the days of manuscript, and before any habit of studying the Gospels together could possibly have become general, would the inevitable consequences of this appa- rently simple alteration have been necessarily apparent. By taking a portion of S. Luke's narrative which records so many events only mentioned by himself, and placing it beyond the point at which it could conflict with any state- ment of either of the other Evangelists, i.e. beyond what was probably regarded as the end of the Galilaean ministry, they would seem to get over the contradiction, without the possibility of creating any fresh difficulty. The almost in- conceivable confusion, which the alteration would involve, both at the point at which the section was omitted, and at the point at which it was freshly inserted, and the way in which this confusion would extend to the other Gospels, would not probably even suggest itself. And so the deed would be done, and the attempt to rectify one apparent contradiction would create a host of only too real ones. Nor, we may add parenthetically, could the evil stop here, for the very cutting, instead of untying, the knot altered an arrangement which only needed to have been studied to have been understood, and which when under- stood would have formed at once an available clue to the other comparatively slight difficulties which alone, before this displacement, the Gospels must have presented. That the apparent contradiction, thus fatally rectified, was of a sufficiently striking and embarrassing character to make it certain to have been perceived directly the Gospels of S. Mark and S. Luke were first compared together is xcii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. obvious, and the displacement by which it was remedied may well, therefore, have taken place at a very early date and whilst comparatively few copies of the Gospels could have existed. 5- Required to prove — That the postponement of what now stands as Luke xi. 14 — xiii. 21 would have been further recommended by its having the effect of preventing an appearance (a) of another supposed contradiction between S. Luke and the other Evangelists, and {b) of a meaningless repetition in S. Luke's own Gospel. As S. Luke's Gospel originally stood, the account of the healing a dumb man would necessarily have to be identified with an account in S. Matthew of our Lord healing one who was blind as well as dumb. But the apparent contradictions involved in this identification are so great, that the balance of critical opinion, even in modern times, has always been against it, and the arguments on the subject, admirably summed up in the Speaker's Commentary, have been generally, though by no means universally, accepted. That the narratives are in fact accounts of the same incident, and that the differences are only such as result from certain principles of narration uniformly observed by S. Luke, it is not our business now to prove. All we have to shew is, that the apparent contradictions between them would necessarily have seemed as great in ancient as in modern times, and would have materially influenced those THE DISPLACED SECTION OF S. LUKE, xciii who, on other grounds, thought that the whole section required to be moved from its original position. That the suggestion of Satanic agency, as an explana- tion of our Lord's miracles, was one frequently made at a later period of our Lord's ministry, would have been another argument for the later date of the incident as cer- tain to suggest itself then as it has done in late years. Again, the great similarity between xi. 33 — 36 and viii. 16 — 18 might at Jirst sight make the former look like a contradictory and incorrect version of the latter, and so give it an appearance not only of meaningless repetition but of inaccuracy, an appearance which would be at once got rid of by the narratives being removed from their original juxtaposition, and one of them relegated to an altogether later period. 6. Required to prove — That, the displacement once made, the advantages of the fresh arrangement of the text would be so much more obvious than the contradictions it entailed that MSS. con- taining the original arrangement would very quickly be discredited. It will be obvious that, supposing the displacement to have taken place as soon as the several Gospels began to be compared, as was probably the case, all existing MSS. would have been altered at the same time, and the error have thus been at once stereotyped. But even assuming it to have been made at a later date, h. g. // xciv GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. the error is one which, from the causes already enumerated, would give the revised version such an air of credibility that the assumption of its correctness would have been certain. Supposing MSS. with the original order to have existed for some time, the argument that it would be absurd to alter an arrangement which, at the point at which the alteration was to be made seemed perfectly consistent with that of the other Evangelists, to one which at once introduced several apparent contradictions between them, would mani- festly have been irresistible either by copyists or revisers x. In fact the illusive nature of the original alteration was such that nothing short of a definite ' principle of reconstruction' could ever allow it to be shewn to be an error, even had any evidence of another order been preserved. The remaining six items of proof, involving as they do a somewhat more detailed statement of facts, may perhaps be best dealt with in separate chapters. 1 The language held by Dr Scrivener with regard to the reading of Galilee for Judaea in S. Luke iv. 44 (see p. 70) affords a striking illustration of the truth of the above remarks. If one of the most distinguished, and withal careful, of Nineteenth Century Critics could so set evidence on one side on the ground of a hastily assumed impossibility, is it at all likely that First or Second Century Copyists or Revisers would be more scrupulous? CHAPTER III. THE FOUR PICTURES. The next 'proof of displacement' which we have to deal with is the following — That, from the nature of the case, — there being three other pictures with which to compare the one supposed to have been tampered with — absolutely conclusive evidence, especially with regard to the present as compared with the original order of events at the several points where the narrative must have been disconnected and reunited, would be forthcoming ; and that this evidence would be as conspicuously absent in the case of the wrong, as it would be conspicuously present in the case of the right order. The case may be put thus : Suppose we have four pictures, which all deal with the same general subject, but which, whilst they do not all portray the same details, have all certain details in common. And suppose that, from the difficulty of recon- ciling them all to each other, it should be suggested that one of them had, at some time or other, been cut into four distinct sections, and had been put together again with sections two and three transposed. In this case the other three pictures would necessarily afford abundant evidence of h 2 xcvi GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. what had been done. A whole series of details would be found to be in one order in three pictures, and in a different order in the fourth. Detailed representations, forming a complete whole in one or all of the three, would be found cut in two in the fourth. Thus, for instance, it might happen that the stern of a boat might be found in one part of the picture and the bow in another, whilst other less marked incongruities would be at once detected by any- minute comparison of the several sections. At the same time, supposing that any one was inclined, in spite of such evidence, to maintain that no such tampering with the one picture had in fact taken place, he would not only be entirely unable to account for the contradictions to the other three that it afforded, but he would find that, beyond the fact of the two sections in question actually occupying the position in which they were found, there was not one jot or tittle of evidence afforded by the other pictures to support that position. Suppose the picture said to have been tampered with to be divided thus : Undisputed (Luke viii. 22 — xi. 13) (Luke xi. 14 — xiii. 21) Undisputed abed and the other three pictures to be divided in a similar man- ner ; it is evident that, if sections B and C in the one picture have been transposed, it must be possible to shew that section B in the suspected picture corresponds with section C in each of the other three, and conversely that section C in the suspected picture corresponds in a similar manner with section B in all the others. (See Table, p. xiv.) Nor would this be the only proof which ought to be available, and which may therefore reasonably be required, THE FOUR PICTURES. xcvii when the integrity of a great masterpiece of antiquity is called in question. Along each line where the dissecting knife originally passed, there will be evidence of its having cut asunder objects which in the other pictures are grouped together, whilst the restoration of the parts to what is claimed as their original position must at once attest the necessity for such restoration by bringing these groups into the same position which they occupy in the other pictures. Thus, in the picture supposed to have been tampered with, the connexion or arrangement of incidents must, if the supposition of displacement be correct, be contradicted by the connexion observable in the other pictures at three separate points, i. e. both where the original connexion with the left and right-hand sections of the picture was de- stroyed, and where the reversal of the sections created a new connexion in the centre of the picture. In other words, at the points (i) between A and B, (2) between B and C, and (3) between C and D, a comparison of all four pictures must necessarily reveal either agreement or disagreement, and that to an extent which must be absolutely conclusive as to the question whether the disputed alteration has or has not been made. But it will be seen that, conclusive as the evidence thus far obtainable would be, further demonstration may be ob- tained by testing the restored connexions in the same way as those alleged to require restoration ; i. e. we can go through the above processes of proof with regard also to the ' restored ' connexion (4) between A and C, (5) between B and D, and (6) between C and B. That all the above requirements in the way of proof are met in the present case to the very fullest extent, will be xcviii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. seen at once by reference to the Table inserted at the end of the Preface. It can hardly be necessary to point out how conspicuous section C of S. Luke is at once seen to be both by its absence from its right, and its presence in its wrong, place. Whilst the required agreement between the reverse sections could not possibly be more perfect. It will be seen also that with the one exception caused by S. Mark grouping the Parables together the order of events, so far as each sectio?i is concerned, is absolutely identical in all four Gospels, and it is plain that, by shifting section B to the vacant space after section A, the required identity of order would be complete. The table will also serve to bring out very strongly the absurdity of supposing that S. Luke himself could possibly be held responsible for an arrangement so manifestly and hopelessly incongruous as that shown by the column devoted to his Gospel. For in the arrangement according to the received text it will be seen that — apart from the ide?itity of order in the details of each section — a comparison of all the incidents included in the two sections actually fails to give one single item of agreement between S. Luke and the other Evangelists ; whilst, the moment section C is shifted, the same comparison fails to give a single item of disagree- ment. Nor will it be found that the requirements with regard to the present and the restored connexions at the several points are less completely fulfilled. The present connexion (i) between sections A and B places the 'embarkation' immediately after events which we know happened on the same day as that on which the Parable of the Sower was delivered and the charge of Satanic agency THE FOUR PICTURES. xcix made. But S. Luke himself, even according to his text as it now stands, shews that between the charge of Satanic agency and the Parables of the Mustard Seed and Leaven — which S. Mark says immediately preceded the embarkation — at least one day, and that a Sabbath, intervened. Thus the present connexion between A and B involves an absolute contradiction between S. Mark and S. Luke, whilst the restored connexion, (4) between A and C, at once removes this, and brings everything into order. Or to put the matter differently. Suppose we 'bracket' events known to have happened on the same day, that is, the Parables of the Mustard Seed and Leaven and the embarkation, the present arrangement actually cuts the bracket in two, and places the second, or lower, half back at Luke viii. 22, and the first half, long after it, at Luke xi. 13, thus exactly carrying out our illustration of cutting a boat in two and putting the bow and the stern in reversed positions in two different parts of the picture. A gro- tesque absurdity which the shifting of the sections at once removes. Again, the present connexion (2) between B and C places Christ's visit to Martha and Mary, and His teaching the Disciples to pray, immediately before the miracle which led to the charge of Satanic agency. But the visit to Bethany S. Luke himself shews to have been subsequent to Christ's starting on the journey commenced when the time was come that He should be received up. How then can it have taken place before events which S. Matthew and S. Mark both shew to have belonged to an altogether earlier period of the ministry, and at a time when their narratives make it impossible for such a visit to have been paid, unless, with Mr Greswell, we suppose Martha and Mary to have c GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. resided in Galilee? On the other hand, the restored connexion (5) between B and D presents no trace whatever either of anomalies or contradictions. The narrative, instead of being a mass of complications, becomes at once simplicity itself. Jesus is then according to the restored order at Bethany at the time of His visit to the Feast of Dedication, and the request that He will teach the Disciples to pray, as John taught his disciples, corresponds exactly with S. John's record of His going to the place where John at first baptized; whilst we obtain at once a connected narrative which begins from this point to agree still more closely with that of S. John, being so adjusted to it de die in diem that the two narratives can only be dealt with, consistently with the exact accuracy of both, in such a way as to give a complete picture of the week which was concluded by the Resurrection of Lazarus. Looking next at the present connexion (3) between C and D, we find that the inconsistencies are if possible even greater here than at either of the other two points. The Parables of the Mustard Seed and Leaven, spoken, as we know independently of S. Luke, at Capernaum and many months before the end of the Galilaean ministry, are actually brought into immediate juxtaposition with the events which took place in a totally different part of the country and which immediately preceded the resurrection of Lazarus. In singularly striking contrast to the impossibility of the present, is the perfect simplicity of the restored connexion, (6) between C and B, according to which S. Luke, in exact agreement with S. Mark, makes the delivery of the Parables of the Mustard Seed and the Leaven immediately precede the embarkation and the stilling of the tempest. Turning now for a moment to take a general view of the THE FOUR PICTURES. ci 'Table' of events, we would draw the reader's attention to two points. (i) It will be seen at once, how entirely it supports the view that the mistake, which in the first instance caused the displacement, arose from the erroneous supposition that S. Mark intended to give an account of a certain remarkable and laborious 'Day of Teaching,' and that it was on the evening of this day that Christ embarked to cross the Sea of Galilee; a mistake which naturally, and even necessarily, led to the conclusion that S. Luke was wrong in putting the embarkation at a later date. And (2), it will be seen how exceedingly wide reaching is the effect upon the other Gospels of the apparently simple postponement of a few chapters to which this mistake gave rise. It is not enough to count up the number of chapters in each Gospel directly affected by this transposition. Owing to the peculiar construction of S. Matthew's Gospel, and to the extent to which it has generally been taken as a guide to the arrangement of the others, the confusion created has really extended to very nearly the whole of our Lord's active ministry. Whilst the rest of it has been almost equally confused by the reading of Galilee instead of Judaea (in Luke iv. 44), a reading which would probably never have been adopted had S. Luke's exact and in- variable accuracy not been obscured by the displacement in question. Thus, directly, the displacement affects the Gospel story from the third chapter of S. Mark to a period within a few days of the last Passover, and, indirectly, from Mark i. 17 to the same date, i.e. the whole of that part of the Ministry of which full details are given. cii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. With all this array of evidence against the present and in support of the restored order of S. Luke's text — evidence which is equally strong at every one of six points — is it for a moment possible to say that, beyond the fact of its existing, there is a single word to be offered in favour of the present arrangement ? Well indeed may theologians have wearied themselves in the vain endeavour to produce any ' scheme ' which should really reconcile even one or two of the endless difficulties and contradictions which are thus shewn to be inseparable from S. Luke's text as it now stands. And who shall wonder, if men, used to weighing evidence, should have come to the conclusion, at which so many have arrived, that S. Luke, whatever else he intended to do, certainly could not have intended to write in chronological order? — a conclusion evidently inconsistent with the fact that one alteration makes his ' order ' and that of S. Mark and S. John identical ; or even that occasionally scholars, prejudiced from the first rather against than in favour of the most modified theories of inspiration, should have felt that the Gospels could not so bear the test of critical investi- gation as to make good their claim to be Inspired Documents ? Or, on the other hand, how can we fail to regard with the deepest thankfulness the wonderful testimony to the strength of the internal and external evidences of the truth of the Gospel story as a whole which is afforded by the fact, that not even the demonstrable historical contra- dictions caused by this single error have ever seriously affected the Faith, with which for eighteen centuries it has been, so almost universally, received ? CHAPTER IV. S. LUKE'S PREFACE1. See Proposition 8 in enumeration of proofs of displacement. To appreciate the force of a statement, however simple, it is generally necessary that we should know with tolerable exactness the circumstances to which it refers. Failing this knowledge, there is considerable danger that either the general drift of the statement, or the points of detail which it involves, or both, should be misunderstood. Whilst if it should so happen that the circumstances alluded to are not only not understood, but from some cause or other should have become the subject of positive misconception, this danger is of course greatly increased. That this proposition applies with peculiar force to S. Luke's preface will be at once apparent. Not only is it couched in language which is susceptible of many modifi- cations in its actual rendering into English, but it contains several expressions which, save in the light of facts of which there is confessedly no certain record, are wholly unintelli- gible. The temptation under such circumstances is first to assume the correctness of what seems to be the most 1 See also pp. lxxxi — Ixxxv. civ GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. probable view of the language used, and then to deduce our facts from the meaning thus given to the statement as a whole. Obviously such a method would never be resorted to so long as there seemed the least possibility of adopting the reverse process, i. e. of first ascertaining the facts, and then seeing how far the expressions in the original statement could be made to fit in with them. Obviously also should this possibility at any time arise, it would constitute an all- sufficient reason for reviewing the previously adopted inter- pretation of the language used, and the opinions subsequently based upon it. Now, if the main contention of this volume can be established, we have at once revealed to us the very facts which are so absolutely essential to enable us to understand what S. Luke's preface really means, and are so far placed much more nearly in the position of those to whom it was originally addressed. The two main facts, from which several subsidiary ones are merely unavoidable deductions, are these : (i) That S. Luke did, as a matter of fact, write in exact historical and chronological order. (2) That he so wrote as to elucidate the order, and confirm the truthfulness, of the Gospels which have come down to us as the writings of those who were either eye- witnesses or ministers of the word, viz. the Gospels of S. Matthew, S. Mark and S. John. Both these facts are established by evidence which it seems impossible to gainsay. The one displacement in S. Luke's Gospel being rectified, we see at once that there is not a shadow of real discrepancy between his order and that S. LUKE'S PREFACE. cv of the other three Evangelists, or in other words that whenever there is any appearance of such discrepancy his 'order' at once explains it, and that we have therefore all the evidence, which the full support of their testimony can give, to his order being what we have termed it, exactly chronological and historical. Nor does the second fact rest on evidence one whit less indisputable. To deny it is to affirm that, though S. Luke expressed his intention of elucidating the order and confirm- ing the truthfulness of certain logoi or Gospels, and that though he has undoubtedly done this with regard to S. Matthew, S. Mark and S. John, yet this is a mere accidental coincidence, and moreover that the Logoi to which he really refers, though of sufficient authority to be accepted by the Church up to the time of S. Luke, as the basis of all cate- chetical instruction, have disappeared without leaving any trace behind them. We might almost as well suppose that every sentence in the present page came into its place by accident, as suppose that S. Luke's narrative could bear the relation which it does to the other Gospels, whilst all the time it was not intended to have any specific reference to them. Not only do they all four traverse precisely the same ground, not only does the actual wording of prolonged narratives constitute a background of exact verbal agreement, but — not to assume what is not dealt with in this volume — there is at least a presumptive probability, (i) that this background is intended to throw out into bold relief the variations on which the peculiarity of each narrative turns, and (2) that the very omissions and additions form part of a definite plan of writing. cv-i GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. Nor, if we look at the arrangement of the Gospel narrative regarded as a whole, and mark the relative bearing of its several parts, does it seem possible to doubt that there is as clear and unmistakeable evidence of the working of some One Master Mind in the composition and ordering of the whole, as there is in any elaborate and exquisitely concerted piece of music. Even those who may not be prepared to accept such phenomena as the Gospels present as an illustration of the Scripture statement that there was ever working in Evange- lists, as in Pastors and Teachers, the Selfsame Spirit dividing to every man severally as He would, still cannot deny the existence of the main facts of the case, or their bearing upon the present issue. Assuming then that the two facts stated above cannot be gain say ed, let us see what are the conclusions which they necessarily involve. (i) They shew negatively that there is no necessity whatever for attributing to S. Luke the meagre and incon- clusive reasoning which the accepted interpretation of his Preface involves, whilst (2) They shew positively that all the statements of his preface are intimately connected with each other, and form together an introduction to his Gospel, which has the closest and most logical bearing both upon its design and execution. (1) For what does the ordinarily accepted interpretation of S. Luke's preface amount to ? Simply to this, that because many other persons had written Gospels, S. Luke considered that the accuracy of his information was a sufficient justifi- cation for his doing the same. Thus understood it is rather S. LUKE'S PREFACE. cvii an apology, than a reason, for writing another Gospel. We are obliged to assume that, during the 25 or 30 years which must have preceded the publication of S. Luke's Gospel, the early Church had been dependent upon oral tradition only, or, in other words, that though sufficient time had elapsed for unauthorized writers to provide written Gospels in con- siderable numbers, the Providence of God and the constitu- ted Authorities of the Church had done nothing whatever to provide any authoritative written documents whatever, either for the instruction of future ages, or for the equipment of those, who were to be themselves "instructed", and to become the instructors of others. The bare idea of such a state of things is so incongruous and improbable as to make us view with suspicion any interpretation of Scripture which would imply it. Nor is this the only pronounced difficulty involved in the current view of S. Luke's words. That his object was to correct a faulty rearrangement of something, this something being assumed to be the oral tradition of eye-witnesses and ministers of the word, is admitted. But this admission is only a preamble to the assertion that when S. Luke specifies his intention of effecting this object by writing "in order", the notion of order does not necessarily involve that of time, but rather that of "moral and logical sequence", and that accordingly his Gospel is "united in its several parts by a spiritual law and not by a table of dates1." But is it possible to conceive that the effect of an erroneous rearrangement of historical facts could be effectu- 1 Professor Westcott's Introduction to the Study of the Gospels, p. 193. cviii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. ally counteracted by another arrangement following a "spiritual law" or a "moral and logical sequence of events"? How, and by whom, was the new "order" to be interpreted so as to be available for its avowed purpose of rectifying an order, the implied fault of which was that it contradicted authoritative teaching and produced uncertainty ? With this licence of interpretation of the words 'in order,' which of the "many" pseudo-Evangelists would have been at any loss to gather from S. Luke support of his particular theory of narration? And would not the writing 'in order,' thus interpreted, have tended rather to emphasize, than remove, any previously existing uncertainty, and so have proved as ineffectual a means for accomplishing the purpose designed as the writing in historical and chronological order would have been effectual ? (2) But to turn to the second fact which we hold to be proved, viz. that the Logoi, the truthfulness of which S. Luke proposed to confirm, and which were the earliest subjects of catechetical instruction, were none other than the Gospels which, after the lapse of 18 centuries, still stand side by side, and are recognised as of coordinate authority, with his own. It is true that tradition and modern opinion have alike assigned dates to these Gospels so inconsistent with this view that its discussion has never seemed to fall within the range of practical criticism. What then is the amount of improbability really involved in the supposition ? To answer this question we must ask ourselves when did the tradition as to the date of the several Gospels spring up, and if untrue, what could have given rise to it, and what has enabled it to hold its own even to the present day ? 5. LUKE'S PREFACE. cix Now if we accept the latest expression of opinion on the early history of the Gospels, supported as it is by an exhaustive review of the facts of the case, we shall be obliged to admit that the value of tradition on the subject is by no means so great as many suppose. Dr Salmon in his Histori- cal Introduction to the Neiv Testament writes (pp. 146, 147), "All the facts lead us to the conclusion that these Gospels which have absorbed all other attempts to commit our Lord's teaching to writing must have been of so early a date, that no previous Gospel had had time to gain an established reputation, and that they must have been written by men holding in the Church some position of distinction. "We may draw what I think is a strong proof of the antiquity of our Gospels from the absence of all authentic tradition as to the manner of their first publication At the latter part of the second century, which is the first date from which Christian writings in any abundance have been preserved to us, it is evident no more was known on the subject than is known now. The publication of the Gospels dated from a time of then immemorial antiquity. There sprung upa belief that Matthew published his Gospel in Pales- tine, Mark in Italy, Luke in Greece ; and, at a later period, John in Asia Minor by way of supplement to the previous histories. It is by no means incredible that the fact that we have three versions of our Lord's life, with so much in common, may have arisen from independent publication at different places at nearly the same time ; but a?iy tradition o?i the subject is too late, for us to build i7iuch on it. If any traditions deserve respect they are those of Papias, who made it his business to collect them, and who was comparatively early in date ; but even Papias is too late to give us much help in solving h. g. i ex GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. the difficulties which the question of the origin of the Gospels presents." What is there, it may be asked, in tradition capable of being thus denned, or in modern opinion based upon it, to set against any strong internal evidence which the Gospels themselves may present ? Nor is our doubt of the value of such tradition at all lessened when we consider the circumstances, which, whether they originally gave rise to it or not, have certainly served both to perpetuate it, and to impart to it the air of probability with which in modern times it has come to be invested. The whole structure of the four Gospels, the essential differences which mark them off so distinctly one from the other, the designed variations assumed to be contradictions or inaccuracies, the omissions and additions in each for which no sufficient reason has been assigned, the assump- tion that a fuller must imply a later development of teach- ing in S. John, and above all the readiness to attribute whatever was difficult to understand to some wide difference in the time or place of writing — all these things would be at least sufficient to suggest in ancient times what in modern days they have so often been supposed to prove. Let us take by way of illustration the traditions about the late date of S. John's Gospel. What credentials do they present to entitle them to more consideration than we give to so many apocryphal statements which have all the advantage of a more certain and far more nearly contem- porary origin? and must it not be allowed that the weight which has been given to these traditions has depended, not upon their intrinsic value, but upon the amount of assumed S. LUKE'S PREFACE. cxi probability which seemed to attach to them, the same cause which may probably have given rise to, thus serving to perpetuate, them, until they attained a cumulative authority altogether out of proportion to the lateness and un- certainty of their origin ? Yet these traditions are all which we have to set against both the probability and internal evidence of the date of the publication of S. John's Gospel being contemporary with, and affected by the same considerations as applied to the Synoptic Gospels ? S. John, to a far greater extent than the other Evange- lists, gives the ipsissima verba of our Lord's discourses. Just in proportion therefore as we assign a later date to the publication of them, we must either detract from their au- thority, or enlarge our conceptions of the fulness of the In- spiration, by which alone, after the lapse of more than half a lifetime, they could have been recalled with such ex- actness. Again, the fuller development of teaching, which was to enable the world to recognize Christ as the Incarnate Word, the Life, and the Light of men, emanated not from the later developed consciousness of S. John, but from Christ Himself. Suppose, however, we set on one side altogether the internal evidence of the fact that one portion of the Evangelic record was assigned to the Beloved Disciple in the same manner that other portions were assigned to the other Evangelists, what shall we have to say to the mere probabilities of the case ? Tradition would have us believe that but for a sug- gestion made to S. John in extreme old age, and but for the i 2 cxii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. fact that this suggestion fell in with his own experience of the spread of certain erroneous opinions, his Gospel would in all human probability never have been written at all. Is it not infinitely more probable that S. John should have been at least as anxious as the other Evangelists to give to the early Church a record of teaching, which he of all others would be the least likely to undervalue ? and how can we account for any very long delay in his undertaking a work so important, and for which we can hardly conceive it possible that he did not recognize himself as responsible from the first ? Again, what evidence is there that he wrote after the destruction of Jerusalem ? and why should we assume as a matter of course that when he speaks of the five porches at the Pool of Bethesda as still existing, he is speaking inaccurately ? It is indeed only a single expression, but it is not counterbalanced by a single one which would require us to suppose it to be an error ; whilst it is supported by the existence in his Gospel of a multitude of minute references all strongly indicative of an authorship at least much more nearly contemporary with the facts related than is generally supposed. Why too should we feel bound to assume that, because he did not allude to the destruction of Jerusalem, he wrote long after any more than we should assume that he wrote long before that event ? Such an assumption ignores altogether the most obvious peculiarities of S. John's Gospel, and omits to give the slightest weight to what seems almost a self- evident fact, that such a notice of that event as is ap- propriate enough to the plan of the other Evangelists, S. LUKE'S PREFACE. cxiii would, when contrasted with the treatment of his subject by S. John, have been as incongruous as a crape scarf would be upon a bridal dress. On the evidences, which I believe to be overwhelmingly strong, of S. John's Gospel forming an integral part of the architectural design, if I may so speak, which dominates the narratives of all the Evangelists, I do not attempt to insist at present. It is then, I cannot help thinking, only when we break loose from the fetters of traditional ideas, that we can really expect to be able to attach its proper value to what without exaggeration we may term the only available testimony of any real value, the internal evidences presented by the Gospels themselves. And foremost amongst these stands S. Luke's preface interpreted by the rest of his Gospel. If we can shew that he not only promises to do certain things but also does them, if, that is, we can shew that he promises to establish the truth of certain previously existing Gospels, and that he does establish the truthfulness, often to their minutest details, of the Gospels of S. Matthew, S. Mark and, though somewhat less directly, of S. John, how is it possible to set mere tradition, were it a hundredfold more authentic than it is, against the irresistible conclusion that these three Gospels were those to which he referred, that they were the ones which had been the subjects of the misdirected efforts of 'many' would-be Harmonists, that they were the Gospels which had the sanction of being written and handed over to the Church by eye-witnesses and Ministers of The Word, and that, long before S. Luke's Gospel was published, long enough that is for many spurious cxiv GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. rearrangements of the earlier Gospels to be compiled and disseminated, they were the recognized and all-sufficient subject of Christian instruction in the Faith? Can we say that there is either any ground for, or any reasonable probability in, the supposition, that, whilst 'many' were engaged in the task of committing to writing apocryphal accounts of our Lord's life, the Apostles, with the promises of their Master still sounding in their ears, should alone have been idle, and have left a want, shewn to have been so urgently felt, to be supplied by other and utterly incompetent hands ? For what purpose was the Holy Spirit to enlighten their understanding and to recall to their minds all that Christ had said, unless it was that they might make known these things to others ? and when, if not at the very first, was it most likely that they would recall, and make trial of, the reality of the assurances thus given them ? Or upon what other foundation than upon records prepared by virtue of this power, were they at all likely to ground the instruction given to those who were daily pressing into the Church ? In other words, what is there in all which is here contended for as stated or implied in S. Luke's preface, which goes one whit beyond what may thus be regarded as the obvious pro- babilities of the case, or which, when supported by over- whelming internal evidence in the whole structure and composition of all the Gospels, should not be regarded as proved by the certain warrant of Holy Scripture? CHAPTER V. THE PLAN OF S. MATTHEW'S GOSPEL. Proposition 9 in enumeration of proofs of displacement. That the correctness of the principles of construction, which suggest and require the alteration contended for, is testified by the fact that when the alteration is made it becomes apparent that, with two or three very minor exceptions, the order of events given by S. Luke is identical with that given by S. Mark, and that we are thus enabled on the testimony of two witnesses, both being Evangelists, to perceive at what points S. Matthew's order is unchronological, and so to ascertain the exact plan upon which his Gospel is written. That the order of events in our Lord's life as given by S. Luke and S. Mark is, with a few very minor exceptions, absolutely identical will be shewn by the annexed arrange- ment of the Gospels, as well as by the conspectus of this arrangement given on pp. xvii — xliv. Regarding S. Matthew's Gospel in the light of this fact, we perceive at once that, whilst it shews a distinct chrono- logical framework, upon which the whole narrative is built up, yet that the idea of chronological order, so far from being the paramount idea or controlling principle of narra- tion, is altogether subordinated to the design of giving special prominence to the Oral Teaching of our Lord. It is this exceptional combination of the historical and didactic method of writing which, in the absence of the true cxvi GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. 'order' supplied byS. Luke, has imported so many elements of uncertainty into the question of the real order of events. Before S. Luke's Gospel was written S. Matthew, S. Mark, and S. John must have appeared to give conflicting evidence on the subject, and the truthfulness of one or the other must necessarily have been called in question by any one attempting to form from them a connected narrative. As, according to our contention, it originally stood, S. Luke's Gospel by confirming the 'order' of S. Mark and S. John at once removed this difficulty, being in fact — sup- posing the view of its preface, already suggested, to be correct — written with this express purpose. No sooner, however, was his text altered, and serious and irreconcileable discrepancies between his order and that of the previously existing Gospels introduced, than the original difficulty appeared in an aggravated form, there being then four instead of three conflicting records, and not the slightest means of determining which of the four was correct. On the other hand, no sooner is this alteration recognized and rectified than the confirmation which S. Luke's Gospel affords to the 'order' of S. Mark and S. John is again apparent, and, as a necessary consequence, the plan of writing adopted by S. Matthew becomes, as S. Luke doubtless intended it should do, perfectly plain and unmistakeable. Desiring to present Christ as the Divine Teacher (i) of all the people, and (2) of the Apostles, S. Matthew begins by setting forth His Oral Teaching, as addressed now to the multitudes, now to the Apostles ; and then proceeds in each case to shew how that teaching was illustrated and enforced by His actions. THE PLAN OF S. MATTHEW'S GOSPEL, cxvii To this design all the ordinary motives of the Historian or the Biographer are evidently subordinated. Thus he does not begin his record of the Ministry, as do S. Mark and S. Luke, with a series of historical details, but, passing over these in the shortest of summaries, proceeds at once to the Sermon on the Mount, the concluding, and not, as it might almost seem in his Gospel, the opening event, of the first portion of the Ministry. In these summaries nothing is mentioned but events — such, for instance, as the residence at Capernaum, the call of the first four Apostles, and the wide range of the labours undertaken both before and after their joining Him — which could not have been recorded later on without conveying to his readers a distinctly false impression. Thus it happens that throughout the first half of his Gospel, whilst grouping together, and so to speak classifying, discourses spoken on very different occasions, S. Matthew as a rule introduces Christ's actions, and even the actions of His enemies, not with reference to the time to which they properly belonged, but with reference to their suitability to illustrate His Oral Teaching, and so to complete a Portrait, rather than a Biography, of the Divine Teacher. However much the intrinsic merits of such a plan might conduce to the originality and grandeur of the whole picture presented by his Gospel, it is obvious that, standing alone, it would be peculiarly open to misconception \ and that, when it came to be compared with the narratives of S. Mark and S. John, a considerable demand would be made upon the faith of those who were called upon to receive all three Gospels as of equal authority. Thus to "many" the temp- tation to rearrange and harmonize the separate histories would be well-nigh irresistible. At the same time the long cxviii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. 'gaps', so to speak, which all three Gospels leave, especially in the earlier part of our Lord's life, would be almost sure to be filled in with details more or less apocryphal and conflicting — the general result being to fix a stigma of untruthfulness upon histories which it was above all things necessary should be above suspicion. Thus we cannot study the plan of S. Matthew's Gospel, however cursorily, without being made to realize the full force of the reason which S. Luke gives in his preface for writing in "order," and with the avowed object that his reader might be assured of " the truthfulness of the Gospels " in which Theophilus was already instructed. It is to S. Luke and S. Mark accordingly that we must turn continually to understand the meaning of S. Matthew's method of dealing with his subject. Once possessed from those sources of the true order of events, our minds will be free to do full justice to the motives which determine the particular position assigned by S. Matthew to each event, or group of events, which he records. Under these circumstances, it will probably be sufficient to present in a tabular form the general arrangement of the more unchronological sections of S. Matthew's Gospel, leaving the reader to supply for himself the reasons by which the departures from chronological order are obviously dictated. THE PLAN OF S. MATTHEW'S GOSPEL. cxix TABLE SHEWING THE ARRANGEMENT OF S. MATTHEW'S GOSPEL READ IN THE LIGHT OF THE < ORDER' OF EVENTS GIVEN BY S. MARK AND S. LUKE. Events prior to the Imprisonment of John the Baptist . i. — iv. 1 1 Summary of events of 18 months, including special notice of the residence at Capernaum and the call of the four Dis- ciples, and a prolonged course of teaching and working of miracles ; such summary and special notices being necessary to prevent the misconception to which S. Matthew's plan of writing would be likely to give rise .... iv. 12 — 25 Sermon on the Mount . . . . . .v. 1 — vii. 29 Epiphanies of Mercy and Power, i.e. a series sometimes of single incidents, sometimes of groups of incidents, illustrating (1) Christ's divine mercy and power, and (2) the general cha- racter of His Ministry; these incidents being selected from those which occurred during the two years which preceded, and the 12 months which followed, the Sermon on the Mount ; events really separated by long intervals of time being thus constantly brought into close juxtaposition . viii. 1 — ix. 34 Summary giving general character of Christ's Ministry . ix. 35 Combined account (a) of the first choice of the Twelve, (b) of the commission given to them a year afterwards, and (c) of many directions given to them at an altogether later date . ix. 36 — x. 42 Summary giving general character of Christ's Personal Ministry, after the Disciples had been sent on an independent mission .......... xi. 1 Incidents, which took place at widely different tunes, but which served to illustrate the unbelief and impenitence of the People and the opposition of the Pharisees, culminating in the charge that Christ's Miracles were due to Satanic agency . xi. 2 — xii. 45 The Unbelief of Christ's Mother and Brethren . xii. 46 — 50 The Unbelief of the People preventing their understand- ing Christ's teaching by Parables ..... xiii. 1 — 52 The Unbelief of the People of Nazareth . xiii. 53 — 58 John the Baptist's Death xiv. 1— 12 Christ's Ministry amongst the Jews concluded by the Feeding of the 5000 xiv. 13 — $6 cxx GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. The Ministry to the Heathen introduced by discourse on meats not defiling, and concluded by the Feeding of the 4000 xv. ]— 39 The Transfiguration, with events immediately pre- ceding and following it xvi. 1 — xvii. 23 Christ, as God not chargeable with Temple dues. . xvii. 24 — 27 Galilean Ministry closed by instructions and exhorta- tions addressed to the Disciples at Capernaum . . . xviii. 1 — 35 Summary of events which took place between the last discourse at Capernaum, i.e. just before the Feast of Tabernacles, and the last Journey to Jerusalem immediately before the Passover xix. 1 — 2 The last Journey to Jerusalem .... xix. 3 — xx. 34 From the last entry into Jerusalem to the final commission given to the Disciples xxi. 1— xxviii. 19 If the reader will be at the trouble of imagining how an Historian, wishing to deal at once both with the life and the teaching of some great political leader, would be most likely to set about his task, he will probably admit that he could not possibly frame his plan of writing on any more effective model than that which is suggested by the above outline of the general plan and scope of S. Matthew's Gospel. And if such be the case, it follows that, a strict adherence to an actual historical order of events being manifestly inconsistent with the plan on which S. Matthew wrote, all transpositions of his text required in any attempt to shew what that order really was, provided only they are exactly regulated by the order vouched for by other Evangelists, are neither "arbitrary," nor in the slightest degree inconsistent with his absolute accuracy. CHAPTER VI. THE CHRONOLOGICAL PROBLEM PRE- SENTED BY THE GOSPELS. Proposition in enumeration of proofs of displacement. That the correctness of the principles of construction, which suggest and require the particular transposition contended for, is testified by the fact, that, when applied to the general arrangement of the Four Gospels, they shew them to be in perfect accord, and thus produce the result which Harmonists have so long striven after but have confessedly failed to arrive at. The above proposition opens the whole question as to the value and correctness of the method adopted, and the result shewn, in the annexed arrangement of the Gospels as compared with the methods and results with which a great number of "Harmonies" have made us familiar. In other words, it requires us to shew that in spite of all previous and acknowledged failures in dealing with the chronological problem presented by the Gospels, it is yet possible to arrive at a solution, the correctness of which shall be self- evident and unimpeachable. The Problem may be stated as follows : — Find an historical order of events, which shall be perfectly consistent with the narratives of each of the Gospels, and which shall not require a single arbitrary or cxxii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. conjectural transposition of the text of either of them, i.e. any transposition which would imply an absence of exact accuracy in the writer, and which is not demonstrably due either to a copyist's or reviser's error, or to causes liable and likely to occur in all narratives, which at greater or less length, and from a more or less different point of view, traverse the same ground and deal with the same events. By this definition it is admitted that any result arrived at by the aid of arbitrary and conjectural transpositions of the text, however many or few these may be, is not a solution of the Problem at all, inasmuch as it involves a violation of its terms, and the destruction of the only standard of accuracy to which appeal as to the correctness of the solution can lie, viz. the existing text of the Gospels themselves, and at once reduces any such solution, to what Strauss has defined as a series of "historical conjectures"; the mere variety of such conjectures, to say nothing of the extent to which they mutually contradict and confuse each other, making it impossible that any weight should properly attach to any of them, or that they should command any general acceptance. That a certain number of transpositions, or to speak more exactly, of 'literary adjustments,' must be made in order to bring the several narratives into accord, is of course a necessity inherent in the nature of the Problem. The distinction, which the reader is asked to bear in mind, lies between transpositions which are arbitrary, i.e. inconsistent with the exact accuracy of the text, and mere adjustments of the text required on purely literary grounds ; the former being obviously inadmissible, whilst the discovery of the A CHRONOLOGICAL PROBLEM. cxxiii points at which the latter are required is no less obviously the one difficulty, upon the overcoming which the whole question of solution turns. To make it clear that not only is a solution of the problem thus stated possible, but that the particular solution arrived at is the right one it will be necessary to shew, i. That a single connected narrative combining every part of the four separate narratives has been formed. 2. That such narrative presents no anomalies which could give offence to a reasonably critical judgement, and which is not at any point self-contradictory. 3. That in the construction of such narrative all the required transpositions or adjustments of the original text of either of the documents dealt with fall within the terms of the above definition. As to the first two of these requirements, the question whether they are complied with by the arrangement of the Gospel text printed in the present volume is a simple matter of fact on which the ordinary reader is as capable of forming an opinion as the most exact critical scholar. It only remains therefore to deal with the third of the above requirements, viz. the transpositions or adjustments of the text which occur in the narrative thus offered as the true solution of the Problem. A reference to the Tables, pp. xvii — xliii will shew (1) That by far the greater number of transpositions are found in S. Matthew's Gospel. (2) That the few adjustments required in S. Mark are of the simplest character. (3) That save for the replacement of the displaced section not the smallest alteration is required in S. Luke's Text. (4) That the same may also be said of S. John's Gospel. cxxiv GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. In order to shew whether these adjustments do as a matter of fact fall within the scope of the definition by which they have to be judged, it will be convenient to group them according to the following classification : a. Adjustments due to a mistake of a copyist or early revisers. b. ,, due to the didactic method of arrange- ment adopted by S. Matthew. c. ,, due to the natural tendency in all writers to treat any given subject as a whole, and to record any incidents, which may have occurred during its progress, either before or after it. d. ,, due to the necessity of an appropriate place being found for the mention of a single incident which a writer may wish to record, but which took place during a period, or which formed part of an episode, with which he did not propose to deal at length. e. ,, due simply to different writers adopting a different method of relating the same facts. To enable the reader to judge how far the ' adjustments ' required in the annexed arrangement of the Gospels fall under any of the above heads, the instances in which the order of the text of either Gospel has been altered to effect them are indicated, in the table given on pp. xvii — xliii, by an asterisk being prefixed to the subject of each section or group of sections thus transposed. An examination of the arrangement of the Gospels thus A CHRONOLOGICAL PROBLEM. cxxv offered as a solution of our problem will shew that it is arrived at by first making the alteration in S. Luke's text admissible on sufficient proof of its duly falling under Class A, and then exactly and without a single exception fol- lowing his restored order; the rules observed with regard to all other adjustments being thus rules which to all intents and purposes may be regarded as laid down in S. Luke's preface. Thus it will be seen that though the combined narrative arrived at by adopting the above method of procedure necessarily involves the unravelling of a considerable amount of intricacy, which constitutes the peculiarity of the original documents, and though a somewhat minute subdivision of the text of each narrative is for this reason occasionally required, and though in the case of S. Matthew's Gospel the position of a considerable number of incidents has to be altered, yet that the general result represents facts, not inferences. It is arrived at not by conjecture, or by elaborate arguments dealing with the probabilities of each case, but by the unvarying application of a rule which not only has the sanction of being laid down by S. Luke himself, but which at once reveals, and gives a sufficient reason for, even the slightest departure from exact chrono- logical order observable in the original documents. It only remains then to consider how far the solution of our problem which the reader is thus asked to accept differs from the solutions which it claims to supersede, viz. those offered by Harmonies in use at the present time, and which we may fairly assume to be improvements upon some two hundred works of a similar character, which are said to have preceded them. It will probably be deemed sufficient for the purpose h. g. k cxxvi GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. of comparison if we select from the most recent and representative Harmonies, (i) The Harmony by the Archbishop of York which appears in the Speaker's Commentary and Smith's Diction- ary of the Bible, and (2) The Harmony appended to Mr McClellan's work on the Gospels. One advantage of selecting these two Harmonies, apart from the fact of their embodying the most recent results of critical inquiry, is that if our two Universities had designedly chosen each a representative they could hardly have selected writers who could be more entirely depended upon to mini- mize any difficulties which might be inherent in the subject. A further advantage will be that it will serve to shew how utterly intractable these difficulties are, as the Gospels now stand, and how impossible it is for the best designed and most skilfully executed Harmony to avoid recognizing in some form or other the effect of the extremely conflicting nature of the evidence to be dealt with, and the further fact that, apart from the proposed alteration in S. Luke's text, there is absolutely no means of judging, save by con- jecture, whether the main outline of the narrative to be formed is to be gathered from S. Matthew, or from S. Luke, or sometimes from one and sometimes from the other, and how far the results arrived at in either case are to be affected by the order of S. Mark and S. John. It will thus shew that it is practically impossible that any two independent inquirers, no matter how able they may be, should arrive at anything like the same results. For not only is the evidence conflicting, but it is so conflicting and confused that there is not even the remotest possibility A CHRONOLOGICAL PROBLEM. cxxvii in many cases of ' striking a balance ' so to speak. A comparison of S. Matthew and S. Luke, made without any knowledge of S. Matthew's plan of writing, would neces- sarily lead to the conclusion that S. Matthew, rather than S. Luke, was to be followed. Yet such a conclusion, however apparently irresistible, would be upset again and again by the testimony of the other two Evangelists. Hence we are not surprised to find that the two Harmonies we have to consider differ toto cczlo in the conclusions which they embody, and that the writers, being compelled by the necessity of the case to make equally great and equally conjectural alterations, present us with two entirely different pictures ; the only certainty about which is that they cannot both be even approximately truthful. Whilst it is almost equally certain that, if we could have before us all the other Harmonies which have been framed, they would be found to be about as much at variance with them as they are with each other. It has already been shewn that so minutely are the Gospels adjusted to each other that a single arbitrary transposition in any one of them is found, when its effect is accurately traced out, to put an entirely new complexion on the narratives of all the others. What then must be the effect of upwards of one hundred transpositions found in both of the above Harmonies, seeing that comparatively few, if any, of such transpositions fall within either of the above classes of admissible adjustments of the text? Let us examine one or two of the most conspicuous, and yet, according to the present text of S. Luke, the most apparently necessary, of these transpositions. In the first-mentioned Harmony we find the ' stilling of k 2 cxxviii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. the storm ' and ' the healing of the Gadarene demoniacs ' placed, S. Matthew being the guide, quite at the commence- ment of our Lord's Ministry and immediately after the first circuit through Galilee. But to make this arrangement, the fourth and fifth chapters of S. Mark have to be placed before the second? whilst the eighth chapter of S. Luke has to be placed before the fifth. All idea of the first crossing the Sea of Galilee being either identified in any way with the so-called ' Day of Teaching,' or even of its being subsequent to any- teaching by parables, has to be altogether thrown on one side ; the result being that we have to presuppose a con- siderable number of absolutely false statements on the part both of S. Mark and S. Luke. That this is a somewhat exceptional instance of the effect of taking S. Matthew's Gospel as a guide, will of course be understood. But not the less will it be seen how utterly impossible it must be, after only one such sweeping and entirely arbitrary alteration has been made, ever again to re-establish anything approximating to real consistency between the several Gospels. But to turn to the second Harmony taken for compari- son. The first serious transposition which we come to places Luke xiii. i — 9 immediately after Luke v. 17 — 26 and immediately before Luke v. 27 ; the warning to the im- penitent Jews, suggested by the slaughter of the Galilaeans, and enforced by the Parable of the Barren Fig-tree, being thus thrown back to the very beginning of Christ's Ministry, i.e. to a time before the call of S. Matthew (Mark ii. 13). Again, Luke xiii. 10 — 17 is preceded by Luke vi. 17 — 19, A CHRONOLOGICAL PROBLEM. cxxix and followed by Luke vi. 12 — 16, the connexion in this case being broken between the healing of the woman bowed down with a spirit of infirmity and the two parables which S. Luke places in such significant relation to it. The next startling transposition we come to is the placing Luke iv. 16 — 30, the visit to Nazareth made at the commencement of Christ's Ministry, opposite to the accounts in S. Matthew and S. Mark of the similar visit made nearly at the end of it; Luke iv. 16 — 30 being for this purpose placed between Luke viii. 1 — 3 and ix. 1 — 6. The above instances will serve to illustrate the essential difference already insisted upon between purely arbitrary alterations and those which are simply such adjustments of the text as are necessitated by the fact of each of the Evangelists having followed a somewhat different method in dealing with his subject. To multiply instances of similar anomalies necessarily abounding in the best conceived and most skilfully executed attempts at a "formal harmonization of the Gospels" could serve no good purpose. If, as is contended, there has always existed one great confusing element introduced by human error, it is evident that, inasmuch as no amount of skill can ever suffice to make facts and statements in themselves contradictory assume the appearance of being in harmony, until this error was discovered such results were simply inevitable. True indeed in the minds of those prepared to give due weight to the overwhelming evidences of the truthfulness of the Gospels as a whole there would necessarily remain the conviction, that there must be some method of reconciling Gospel statements, and that, from the nature of the case, cxxx GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. there "could only be," as Mr Gresvvell expresses it, "one method which could be absolutely just and true." Of those taking this view of the matter many might well rest contented to assume that the requisite data for dis- covering this method were not in fact ascertainable, whilst others would only find in all previous failures sufficient ground for arguing that "so long as there is reason to confess that we do not yet possess a correct and sufficient harmony, so long it is not only excusable, but perhaps even necessary, that we should still continue to frame harmonies, in the hope that one such may be produced at last1." Others again were certain to object that every fresh attempt to discover this long sought-for "method" could only tend to shew that no such method existed, and that the constantly increasing "variety and incompatibility between the several modes of reconciling the same accounts would be calculated with some minds to operate reflexively against the belief of the truth, or the consistency of those accounts themselves2." The via media which those who have been most strongly impressed with this latter view have deemed to be on the whole the most probable solution of the difficulty is sig- nificantly expressed in the opening words of Professor Westcott's Preface to his Introduction to the Study of the Gospels: "My chief object has been to shew that there is a true mean between the idea of a formal harmonization of the Gospels and the abandonment of their absolute truth." By such contradictions as we have seen to be inseparable from the best harmonies, no less than by the conclusions of hostile critics which have been based upon them, Dr 1 Greswell's Dissertations, vol. I. p. 12. - Ibid. A CHRONOLOGICAL PROBLEM. cxxxi Westcott would probably seem to many to be as much justified in saying, "It was certainly an error of the earlier Harmonists that they endeavoured to fit together the mere facts of the Gospel by mechanical ingenuity," as he doubtless is in adding, "But it is surely no less an error in modern critics that they hold the perfect truthfulness of Scripture as a matter of secondary moment." But the issue which the present volume is intended to raise is, Can the objections brought against the necessary contra- dictions inseparable from ordinary Harmonies, and justified both by these contradictions and by the conclusions based upon them, be urged against the solution of the Harmonistic difficulty which is now suggested ? For even supposing that we could regard the one main 'transposition' adopted as being 'arbitrary' in the fullest sense in which we have used the word, would it not be still possible to argue, that, as every arbitrary transposition implies an error, it must be more probable that one error should have been made than an indefinite number; and that one alteration, which has the immediate effect of bringing all the Gospels into accord, may be admissible, when a multitude, the only tendency of which is to emphasize previous disagreements, may reasonably be disallowed ? On the other hand, if it be deemed wholly beyond the limits of possibility that any one arbitrary transposition could produce the effects which this one produces, how is it then possible to resist the conclusion that the mere dis- covery of the error, which this transposition serves to correct, cxxxii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. must be as a matter of fact that one "absolutely just and true" solution which Harmonists have so fruitlessly and yet so perseveringly sought for ? Let it only be granted that the Gospels have been "given by the inspiration of God", and what more logical or irresisti- ble conclusion can be arrived at, than that any imperfection discoverable in them must be traceable to some human error ? It is after all but the lesson which in the wider domain of nature meets us every day. Even the very emblems of the perfection of God's handiwork, the lilies of the field, if some corroding substance has been brought into contact with their roots may droop their heads, and shew signs of disfigure- ment, which the brush of the greatest painter who ever lived would be powerless to correct, but let the humblest hand take away the cause of evil and there is needed nothing further to make them once more revive and be again arrayed in a glory unapproached and unapproachable. CHAPTER VII. THE FOUR YEARS OF OUR LORD'S MINISTRY. Proposition in the enumeration of proofs of displacement. That, whereas the revision of S. Luke's text required to rectify the alleged displacement is of so unusual and drastic a character, that, if no such displacement had taken place, it would necessarily serve greatly to increase any previous difficulty in reconciling the several narratives, it does as a matter of fact entirely remove that difficulty, and results in our being able to form a combined narrative, which at once commends itself to our judgement as certainly true, and at the same time solves many problems which have given rise to the greatest amount of controversy. I It is obvious that, if so serious a displacement as we contend for has really taken place, it would not only throw the whole Gospels, regarded as parallel narratives, into confusion, but would tend so entirely to obscure any principles upon which they might be constructed, that the very existence of such principles might remain unsuspected. Thus, supposing a person to be seeking, (i) to obtain a general view of the whole History set forth in the Gospels, and (2) to understand the structure of the Gospels, and their relation one to another, just as the astronomer seeks to under- stand the mutual relation of the heavenly bodies, he would find himself, in the one case, in the position of a man viewing a particular scene from behind an almost impervious hedge, cxxxiv GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. and therefore getting only imperfect and distorted views of it, and, in the other, of a man pursuing what he expected to find a distinct subject of scientific inquiry, but in which all the phenomena, from which alone any primary laws could be deduced, proved to be in so manifestly chaotic a state, that nothing but contradictory and mutually destructive results could possibly be looked for. To deal now only with the first part of our analogy, the one thing needful is evidently to cut down the hedge, or, in other words, to rectify the obscuring displacement, and then to see how the view obtained compares with our previous impressions. The displacement rectified, we have two points to deal with, (i) the extent, and (2) the general character of the view which the Gospels then present to us. In other words we have to consider 1. The duration of our Lord's Ministry. 2. The general scope and bearing of the history in its new aspect. 1. As S. Luke's text stands in the Authorized Version we have four records of the Ministry, of which no two agree in the order of the events which they relate. The necessary result has been that there has always existed a very wide divergence of opinion, even upon so fundamental a point as the actual number of years over which that Ministry extended. The most generally accepted view has been that it lasted three years. At the same time the arguments upon which this con- clusion has been based have always seemed to many singularly inconclusive. So much so indeed that not only THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. cxxxv has so able a writer as the author of the Ordo Sceclorum contended, and that with many ancient authorities to support his view, that it could only have lasted one year, but one of the most generally recognized authorities on all subjects of Gospel criticism so far endorses his opinion as to say, "It must be remembered that a very strong case has been made out by Mr Browne {Ordo Scec/orum) for the limitation of the Lord's Ministry to a single year. If there were direct evidence for the omission of to -n-aaxa in John vi. 4 his arguments would appear to be convincing".1 In view of the conclusion to which the rectification of the alleged displacement in S. Luke necessarily points, it may be well here to note the terms in which different opinions as to the meaning of the Parable of the Barren Fig-tree are summed up by the Editor of so representative a work as the Speaker's Co77imentary . He says, " In the three years some have seen allusion to God's various successive calls to Israel by the Law, the Prophets, and by Christ (Augustine, Theophylact) ; others, as Bengel, Wieseler, Lewin F. S. p. 225, with Alford and perhaps Olshausen, to the three years of our Saviour's Ministry. To this Meyer objects that a fourth year is mentioned v. 8. He (with Grotius, Kuinol, Bleck, Godet) interprets the three years of the past, and the fourth year of the remaining, time of Grace accorded to Israel. It is difficult to resist the impression that in the three years there is at least an allusion to the period of our Lord's Ministry on earth." The bearing of the supposed alteration in S. Luke's text on the question thus discussed is obvious. 1 Professor Westcott's Introduction to the Study of the Gospels, p. 289. cxxxvi GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. According to S. Luke's Gospel, as it now stands, only three years can be allotted to our Lord's Ministry, and as the parable was clearly spoken towards the end of the Ministry, no room, as Meyer points out, is left for a fourth year of further probation. But the alleged displacement being rectified, not only do four years appear as the duration of the Ministry, but the Parable appears as spoken in the last half of the third year, and, probably to a day, just one year before the conclusion of our Lord's more active Ministry. Thus, supposing the displacement really to have taken place, the obvious and unavoidable meaning of the Parable is found to be exactly identical with that which, even in the face of an apparently unanswerable objection to it, many held to be its true meaning, whilst this meaning has seemed so inherent in, and inseparable from, the wording of the Parable, that an able critic after reviewing all the evidence, finds it " difficult to resist the impression" that, in spite of any evidence to the contrary, it must in some form or other be the real one. Surely this fact alone, apart from all the other multitu- dinous evidences of ' displacement', might well go some way at least to establish the certainty of S. Luke's text having been tampered with as suggested, and to confirm the conclusion to which on other grounds his restored order points, that our Lord's Ministry did in fact extend, as implied, or rather stated in cipher, in the Parable, over a period of Four Years. 2. Nor, if we look into the details of the history of the Ministry, and especially if we observe the scope and THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. cxxxvii symmetry of its plan, shall we be at any loss to find abun- dant evidence in confirmation of the conclusion thus stamped with such an air of p?ima facie probability. From the time of the Baptism and Temptation of Christ, the history, though taken up now by one and now by another Evangelist, runs on with unfailing regularity : the only peculiarity, which is likely to confuse the reader, being, that throughout the Gospels the history of periods of time is given with almost the same brevity and reserve that marks the record of the years spent by our Lord in obscurity at Nazareth. Whilst, on the other hand, particular incidents chosen for special record mostly occurred during short periods of special teaching, generally lasting for a week or three days, and are related with an amount of detail which makes the brevity of the summarized history all the more apt to mislead. Let us commence our survey of the general History of the Four Years with the briefest notice of what we may term the Introductory Period, when the 'hour' of the active Ministry had not as yet come. S. John we observe deals exclusively with the later aspect and development of the Baptist's teaching, that is, his Testimony of Witness. The first result of this testimony introduces us to the four Disciples, who, at the Baptist's bidding, but voluntarily as far as Christ was concerned, transfer their allegiance from him to Christ. We are thus introduced, first of all, to those four members of the future Apostolic Body, who were to be so signally distinguished from their future fellow labourers, who were to be Christ's friends and hosts at Capernaum,. cxxxviii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. who were to be the first called into the Vineyard, and who above all were to bear the burden and heat of the day to a far greater extent than the rest of the Disciples. Next we read of Philip and Nathanael, and note that the command "Follow me" was first of all addressed to him, whom we shall find at the very last spoken to in terms which seem to imply that from the first he had been more constant than others in his attendance upon Christ. As though the phenomena of Creation and Redemption were at the first, as at the last, designedly combined, we next observe that the record of a complete week is concluded, as on the occasion of the Resurrection of Lazarus, and of our Lord's own Death and Resurrection, with the history of three days, ending probably on this, as on those occasions, with the first day of the week. " On the third day" the first gathering of the nucleus of the future Church is followed by that Marriage Feast, which indicated, not only that there was thenceforward a mystical union between Christ and His Church, but that the time had come when the "good" albeit "the new" wine of the Gospel was to be provided in such bounteous measure. Then follows the first part of the twofold commencement of the Ministry, the commencement at the Passover, and the commencement at the Feast of Pentecost ; the typical cleansing of the Temple, the allusion to the Temple of His Body, and the first evidence of the full foreknowledge of what the temper then manifested by the Jews would result in, marking the special connexion between the 'first com- mencement' and the more exclusively Jewish aspect of the Ministry. From the very first, the bigotry of some, and the dulness THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. cxxxix of others, amongst the Jews, is presented to us as affording the same striking contrast to the conduct of others less favoured, which is to form one great characteristic feature of the reception, which Christ was to meet with at the hands of those to whom He was more especially "sent." Already the uHow can these things be? " of Nicodemus, a teacher in Israel as he was, and taught by Christ Himself, is prepared to be set against the unreserved confession of the Samaritan strangers, taught only by a woman, "This is indeed the Christ, the Saviour of the World." The residence in the country districts of Judsea, which immediately follows Christ's attendance at the Passover, is only prolonged for a sufficient time to allow the Pharisees once more to receive the renewed and more explicit testimony of the Baptist, and to be certified not only of his repudiation of all claims to be himself the Messiah, but of the fact that this renunciation had been already practically accepted, and acted upon, by the people, who, forsaking John's ministry, had sought baptism at the hands, not of Christ Himself, but — a fact which would carry with it far more weight — of His Disciples. Only when He is himself certified that this additional evidence had been duly brought before the Jewish authorities, does Christ once more prepare to give Jerusalem an oppor- tunity of reversing their first verdict on His teaching. But before going up to the Feast of Pentecost there was still time to go again into Galilee, and to join the company which would be going up from thence to the Capitol. On the way, as a bright and happy interlude between the two visits to Jerusalem, occur the incidents connected with the short residence in Samaria, incidents doubly cxl GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. memorable, as foreshadowing the future triumphs of Christ's teaching of the Gentiles, and as the immediate cause of the Parable, by which our Lord at once inaugurates His Ministry, reveals the hidden sources of the strength in which all work for God must be carried on, and testifies to the immediate rewards which such work brings with it1. The significant mention of the fact that the healing of the Jewish nobleman's son was the second miracle wrought in Can a of Galilee prepares the way for our recognizing the exact position which this miracle occupies in the general plan of the Gospel. The key-note of the narrative is evidently to be found in the twice-repeated request to Jesus to lcome down' to heal his son, embodying as it does an ex- pression of that want of faith, which prevented the recogni- tion of the fact so clearly understood and expressed by the Gentile Centurion, that the Bodily Presence of Christ was not in itself a necessary condition of His completing any work of mercy which His compassion might lead him to undertake. Can it be, we may ask, a mere coincidence that so singularly appropriate a lesson for Ascensiontide, a lesson so characteristic of S. John's Gospel, that men should walk by faith and not by sight, should have been given either about, or it may be exactly, ten days before the Day of Pentecost was fully come? However we may answer this question, it seems clear that "the second miracle" at Cana has the same general and ex- tended typical reference to the whole Ministry as the first, and that it stands very much in the same relation to the immediately succeeding visit to Jerusalem, and the more 1 See page lxx. THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. cxli formal opening of the Ministry at the Feast of Pentecost, which the first miracle did to the earlier and more prepara- tory visit at the Passover. The visit to the Feast of Pentecost, and the miracle, performed at the Pool of the Five Porches, and for the benefit of one whose period of suffering corresponded with the duration of the penal wanderings of the Children of Israel in the wilderness, represents the opening of the Ministry in action, as the subsequent manifesto represents its opening in appropriate teaching. The choice of the Sabbath Day for the performance of the miracle is shewn to be at once a claim to Divine power, and an evidence of the identity of Christ with the Father, and leads up naturally to the declaration of those great truths, to which, then as afterwards, the Jewish rulers, in spite of every evidence which they could possibly require, were so determined to turn a deaf ear. Our Lord's Ministry being thus formally inaugurated, and His rejection by those to whom He was primarily sent being complete and unequivocal, the work, by which this rejection was to be as it were compensated for, is at once commenced. Coincidently with Christ's rejection at Jerusalem John is cast into prison, and the Law which was until John passed away1. From this time therefore begins the long and laborious Ministry by which, not, as it should have been, with the aid, but in spite of the fiercest opposition, of priests and rulers, the foundations of the Kingdom were to be firmly laid. 1 See ch. x. H. G. / • cxlii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. Probably alone — for few, if any, of those who had at first followed Him had yet elected to do so at the sacrifice of their worldly callings, — or at least with only such occasional fol- lowers as would be naturally attracted to a Teacher, accredited as He already was, Christ commences His work, not now in the great centre of Jewish worship, or in that glorious Temple, to which He had "suddenly come" only to be cast out from it, but in the humblest of provincial synagogues. The first beginnings of a work, thus recommenced under new circumstances and on fresh lines, would not naturally afford incidents needing to be recorded with the same fulness as those which were to mark its gradual advancement and more mature development. Accordingly, a few verses of emphatic summary tell us all that needed to be told of the history of the next few months. From these we gather that the Ministry of the first summer, though its actual teaching was little more than a slightly developed form of that which had been given by the now imprisoned Baptist, differed little, if at all, in its plan from that of the next three years. It was simply a summer circuit of teaching, and that chiefly, if not exclusively, in the synagogues of Galilee. Only as we approach the next great Festival, the Feast of Tabernacles, and arrive at the Day of Atonement, which preceded that feast by only five days, are we permitted to witness any of the details of this work. Nazareth was to Galilee, as far that is as Christ was concerned, very much what Jerusalem was to Judaea. To Nazareth therefore we find our Lord turning His steps, both at the beginning and the end of his labours in Galilee, and THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. cxliii only when Nazareth, on the occasion of the first ministerial visit made to it, exactly followed the example of Jerusalem, was Capernaum chosen for the honour, which should by rights have belonged to the place, which had given to the Messiah not only a name but for so many years an earthly home. Escaping from the murderous design of the men of Nazareth, and making His way at once towards Capernaum, our Lord necessarily passed along the shore of the Sea of Galilee. Here, in four fishermen engaged in their ordinary occupation, He recognizes those who had already been dis- tinguished as ready, merely on the testimony of John, to accompany Him for some time as His recognized followers and disciples. The immediate result of this meeting is that Christ arrives at Capernaum not alone but in company with those already well disposed to receive His further teaching, and prepared to be both hosts and friends. At Capernaum therefore Christ now takes up His abode with the evident intention of making it the basis of His future work, and the centre from which the "great light" of His teaching should penetrate the darkness of the surround- ing districts. That on the occasion of His first visit to a place designed to be thus exalted unto Heaven by being made the earthly abode of Him, who was very God as well as very Man, Christ would be likely to remain for a longer time than we find Him doing in the three following years is only what we should expect. We are not therefore surprised to find S. Matthew using an expression with reference to this first visit which implies a sojourn of considerable duration, or that this I 2 cxliv GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. expression should be incidentally confirmed by S. Mark and S. Luke telling us that it was His custom during this residence to preach in the synagogue on the Sabbath days. Supposing that we allot to this inaugural visit of Christ to His newly-chosen home, the shortest period at all consistent with the language used, viz. three or four months, we are brought very nearly to the end of the first year of the Ministry, and to the time when, judging by our Lord's custom in other years, He would be likely to commence a Circuit of teaching. That this Circuit, as briefly recorded by S. Luke, should have taken our Lord into Judaea about the time when that country would be once more, so to speak, alive with people going to, and returning from, the Passover is as consistent with the probabilities of the case as it is with the records of the preceding and the following year. Whilst the fact thus stated by S. Luke is incidentally confirmed by the later statement of all the Synoptic Gospels as to the numbers of people who were attracted to Christ, not only from Judaea but from Idumaea and from beyond Jordan. Allowing for this Spring Circuit in Judaea a period of about two or three months, including the Passover, we arrive at the Feast of Pentecost in the second year of the Ministry. This feast, the records of the preceding year would natu- rally lead us to view as the very probable starting-point of some new departure in the work of the Ministry, whilst the records of succeeding years would point to this new departure as likely to be in some way connected with those who were to be prepared for ultimately carrying on the work which as yet Christ was carrying on alone. THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. cxlv Accordingly we find that the next incident recorded is the call of four of the future Apostolic Body. For several months Peter and Andrew, James and John had been brought into the closest contact with Christ and been afforded abundant opportunities of hearing His teaching and witnessing His miracles, and the time was now come for the call to be made upon them, which was to entail their immediate abandonment of the only visible means of subsistence for themselves, and those dependent upon them, and so to alter the whole course of their lives. That the actual call of the four Disciples who were to begin thus early to bear the burden and heat of the day took place when Christ had left Capernaum, and actually started on a prolonged Circuit through Galilee, is to be gathered from the statements both of S. Matthew and S. Luke, The work upon which our Lord now entered, accompanied during the whole time by at least these four of the future Apostles, and during the latter part of the time by S . Matthew also, would seem to have lasted for exactly a year, that is from the Feast of Pentecost in the second to the same Feast in the third year of the Ministry, and to have been divided into two Circuits, the first finishing at Capernaum about the Feast of Tabernacles, and the second commencing after a short sojourn at Capernaum with the call of S. Matthew, and being interrupted, probably at Sepphoris near to Nazareth, >y the active enmity of the Pharisees and Herodians. As Josephus tells us that there were 204 towns and villages in Galilee, with an average population of about fifteen thousand in each, it is evident that the time over which the first of these two Circuits would appear to have cxlvi GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. extended was certainly not longer than would be likely to have been devoted to a systematic visitation of the whole country, nor longer than would certainly be required so to supplement the work of the two previous Circuits in Galilee and Judaea as to produce the general result testified to by the different Evangelists. In the first of these two Circuits the route taken seems to have extended through the north-west districts and ultimately through Decapolis, our Lord finally retiring for a season of prayer to the deserts lying to the north-east of the Sea of Galilee and thence returning to Capernaum. The second Circuit of this year, which is not spoken of as confined to Galilee, probably extended a considerable distance to the south, S. Mark speaking of Idumaea to the south of Jerusalem and the districts beyond Jordan in Southern Palestine as influenced by our Lord's teaching, whilst both the time, place, and circumstances of the Circuit being interrupted would seem to point to a return from the south a few weeks after the Passover. The only event which is recorded in connexion with the first of the two Circuits of this year is the Healing of the Leper. The peculiar prominence thus given to this miracle by S. Mark and S. Luke, and the fact that S. Matthew brings it into even greater prominence by giving it a priority in time of narration over all other miracles, leads to the sup- position that it is recorded as a typical illustration of that power and willingness to forgive sin of which all Christ's teaching was designed to give assurance, and that, until this assurance is realized, all His teaching can but fall upon ears which hearing yet hear not. THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. cxlvii The events recorded in connexion with the second Circuit are as evidently designed to have an historical, as the one event related in connexion with the first Circuit, is to have a doctrinal significance. Out of all the incidents, to which such a circuit must under the circumstances of the case necessarily have given rise, five only are singled out for record. And all five have reference to alleged infringements of the Jewish Law. That the number of illustrative incidents should corre- spond with the number of the Books of the Law can hardly excite surprise in the minds of any who recall the evidently significant recurrence of this number throughout the Gospels. The five porches, connected on the one hand with the first Pentecostal Miracle and on the other with a disease which had lasted for the exact period of the penal wandering in the wilderness, the five husbands, the five thousand, the five loaves, the five brethren, the five pounds, the five talents, the five cities, the five yoke of oxen, the five sparrows, the five in one house, the five foolish and the five wise virgins, are all instances of the prominence given to this number throughout our Lord's teaching. Nor can we fail to notice how natural is the sequence of events by which these " offences" lead up to the combination of Pharisees and Herodians in a plot against our Lord's life ; a plot which only issues, first in a more universal healing of all manner of disease and of men from all quarters, and then in a more authoritative and pronounced teaching in the Sermon on the Mount. The question naturally suggests itself, Did our Lord, during the first two years of His Ministry, attend the Passover at Jerusalem ? cxlviii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. It is not enough to say that we have no information on the subject. In the mind of every student of the Gospels there must necessarily be an assumption either in favour of, or against, such an attendance. A single passage in S. John's Gospel in which Christ, when present at the Feast of Tabernacles in the last year of His Ministry, says "I have done one work and ye all marvel" is generally supposed to imply that He had ?iot been in Jerusalem between the time of His using this expression and the occasion on which that "one work", the miracle at the Pool of the Five Porches, was performed. But all that this passage necessarily implies is that no special and significant ministerial acts of a similar kind — and which therefore required to be recorded — had been per- formed. Looking to the peculiar construction of the Gospel narratives, and especially to the manner in which they single out for record only certain acts manifestly intended to have a special significance, and so illustrate continually the force of S. John's words, " Many other things Jesus did which are not written in this book," and looking to the further fact that Jesus was undoubtedly making a special circuit in Judaea at the time of the second Passover, and that He was probably returning back either close by or through Jerusalem at the time of the third, I cannot help thinking that there are strong grounds for assuming that He did attend that Feast on both occasions. It will of course be remembered that, save in its exclusive reference to the Jews, it was not the Passover, but the Feast of Pentecost, from which all our Lord's ministerial acts date, that being, in the first year, the time of THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. cxlix His Ministerial Manifesto and the performance of the " one work" of such deep significance, and, in ensuing years, the time of a distinctly new departure, and the gathering of new forces to take part, in His work. But to pass to the third year of the Ministry. It is evidently some time after the Passover, and either on, or just about, the time of the Feast of Pentecost, that the Apostles were finally selected from the great body of Christ's followers, and the Sermon on the spiritual fulfilment of the Law was delivered on the Mount. The incident next related is again designed to bring into the greatest possible prominence the contrast between the faith of Gentiles and the want of faith in the Jews; the conduct of the Roman centurion, who would not have Christ trouble to come to his house, and wished Him only to 'speak the word,' clearly putting to shame the Jewish nobleman, son of the Kingdom as he was, who would not be satisfied with ' the word ' being spoken, but insisted upon Christ's personal presence, reiterating with increasing earnestness the cry, " Sir, come down." It is but the same moral which the Gospel story, with somewhat less marked emphasis, has pointed again and again. From the time when Chief Priests and Scribes, who admitted their full knowledge of the prophecies pointing to the birth- place of the Christ, would not only not move a step to welcome Him, but rather gave their aid to Herod to compass His death, whilst the wiser men, with far less means of knowing Him, travelling from afar, hastened to fall down and worship Him, and to give effect to their adoration by the rarest gifts — from the time when the faith of Samaritan strangers, cl GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. believing on the word of a woman, put to shame the unfaith of Nicodemus and of the Jews who had witnessed His miracles and been unmoved by them — from the time when these same miracles secured The Worker of them acceptance in Galilee, when in Jerusalem, though crowned by a still mightier work, they only led to a desire to kill Him — from the beginning even to the end, when the Jews only mocked at the dying Saviour and left it for the Roman centurion to confess, " Truly this was the Son of God", the whole Gospel story is but a prolonged Commentary on the words of S. John's Preface, "He came unto His own and His own received Him not; but as many as received Him to them gave He power to become the Sons of God ; even to them that believe on His Name." Accordingly at this central and peculiarly critical point of the Ministry — the beginning of the personally-superintended work of the Twelve — we have these facts recognized, and made the subject of the emphatic declaration, "Verily I say unto you, I have not found so great faith, no, not in Israel. And I say unto you, that many shall come from the East, and from the West, and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob, in the Kingdom of Heaven : but the sons of the Kingdom shall be cast forth into the outer darkness ; there shall be the weeping and gnashing of teeth" (Matt. viii. 10 — 12). The next recorded incident, the Raising of the Widow's Son, could not we see at once be placed at any other point in the Ministry without losing something at least of its significance. Just as the Raising of Jairus' Daughter and of Lazarus are complements of two other distinct periods of special teaching, so this is the symbolical complement of the THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. cli Sermon on the Mount, and tells of the love and power with which Chiist would fain visit and redeem His people; the widow, if we may accept the earliest teaching of the Church, being a lively image of the Jewish nation who had said, ''1 shall not sit as a widow, neither shall I know the loss of children" (Is. xlvii. 8). From the Raising of the Widow's Son dates the com- mencement of the Summer Circuit of the third year of Ministry, during which the Apostles serve their Diaconate with Christ Himself, whilst the faithful amongst the women of Galilee are permitted to set an example to their sisters of every age and country of the manner in which that ministry of love should begin, which in the end will secure for them the actual sight of, and welcome by, their Risen Lord. This Circuit extending through towns and villages which Christ "kept journeying through," "preaching and bringing the good tidings of the Kingdom of God" would seem to have been mainly if not exclusively confined to Galilee. We have seen that the previous Circuit had probably been interrupted at Sepphoris, the place to which at a later period the Jewish Sanhedrin was removed, and the only place within a short distance of the Sea of Galilee where Pharisees and Herodians were likely to be found in a position to enter into any formal coalition. Supposing this to have been the case, as Sepphoris and Nain, both in near proximity to Nazareth, are near also to each other, this Summer Circuit practically commenced where the preceding Winter and Spring Circuit had been broken off. But the public Ministry of the Disciples could hardly commence without some reference to John. clii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. Hence we have at this point the arrival of two of John's disciples sent by him to see if Christ would succeed better than he had himself done in convincing them of that, which he had so persistently, but so vainly, taught them, viz. that Christ was indeed ''He which should come." That some would think that John had sent the message on his own account was clearly anticipated by our Lord. That this idea could not for a moment be entertained by John's own disciples He indeed well knew, and therefore it is not until after their departure that He takes occasion to shew how little danger there had ever been of the Baptist's constancy being "shaken" by the fiercest blasts of trial to which it might be exposed. Concluding a testimony which, had it been called forth by John's weakness rather than his strength, would surely have been strangely out of harmony with the circumstances, Christ next enlarges upon the attitude of those who listened neither to John nor to Himself, shewing that they exhibited an inconsistency, which could not at least be charged upon John's disciples. For what the Jewish rulers objected to in John they required in Him, and what they had required in John they objected to in Him. The next recorded incidents, — the forgiveness of the woman who was a sinner, and the delivery of the Parable of the Two Debtors, — once more advance the teaching of Christ another stage, and strike a note, which is henceforward to predominate more and more, until it rises in such startling and unexpected resonance in the words addressed from the Cross to the penitent thief. No longer in figure, as in the second Circuit in the case of His healing the leper, no longer by implication, as on the eve THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY cliii of the third Circuit, when He committed the first "offence" by curing the sick of the palsy, with the words "Son, be of good cheer, thy sins be forgiven thee," but now emphatically, and as One before whom all alike would hereafter be arraigned as debtors, Christ exercises the direct power of forgiving sin, and affords an actual illustration of His previous declaration, that He had come not to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance. Thus in each Circuit, and that with ever-growing dis- tinctness, did Christ insist upon that one fundamental truth of His Ministry, which, in His last journey to Jerusalem, He was to insist upon and illustrate with such marvellous force and pathos and wealth of imagery, and which was to be enforced even in His dying agony with the words, " this day shalt thou be with me in Paradise." Such, so few and yet so significant, are the illustrations given us of the nature of the teaching and training which distinguished the Circuit in which Christ was first accom- panied by the newly-appointed Apostolic body, and by the more faithful amongst the Galilcean women. The end of this Circuit brings us again to about the time of the Day of Atonement and the immediately subsequent Feast of Tabernacles, that is, to the autumn of the third year of Ministry; the time when the sower would be going forth to sow, and the equinoctial gales would come down with their periodic fury upon the Sea of Galilee. Once more Christ is at Capernaum. What the Apostles and the multitudes have learned in the practical school of experience had now to be taught them in theory, and enforced by word of mouth. cliv GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. 1 Hence we come next to the Great Three Days of Teaching, public teaching of all alike, and private teaching and exhortation addressed to the Disciples "in the house'' — "the house" that is "of the Lord," the words which combined in the original form the word Church — the then Church of Christ, in which Christ was the Teacher, the Apostles the learners, and to which such of the outside multitude as were willing to come were likewise admitted. Without attempting to dwell at length upon the sustained and laborious teaching of this period, we may yet remark how it first introduces many topics, which were afterwards to be insisted upon with such increasing frequency and earnestness, and how fully, though for the first time, it reveals what was afterwards to take place. The actual period of teaching, the very days of the week which it occupied, the subjects which were dealt with, the way in which it commenced, the marvellous exhibition of power with which it terminated, all remind us of the second and even greater Three Days of Teaching, which were brought to a close by the resurrection of Lazarus, and carry our minds on to the greatest Three Days' Teaching of all, viz. those which begin with the Condemnation and Crucifixion and end with the Resurrection of Christ. Not to dwell upon the previous period of Three Days mentioned by S. John, and ending with the manifestation of Christ's Glory, each begins on a Friday in conflict, and ends on the first day of the week in an exercise of Divine power. In each case there is an increase of intensity. The false accusation by the Jews, the seeking to kill by Herod, the actual killing by the chief priests and rulers respectively mark the beginning of each period. The rising from sleep to still the storm, the healing THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. civ of many and finally the raising of one from the dead; the speaking of the word bidding the buried dead come forth from the tomb \ the earthquake, the presence of an Angel, and the rising to life of Him who was the Lord of Life, respectively mark the termination by which in each case Christ is manifested in ever-increasing perfection of power. As the immediate illustration and outcome of the Teach- ing of the first two days we have the record of the first visit to 'the other side,' a district which was either entirely heathen or of which the population was at least made up of Jewish and heathen elements. Of the two demoniacs healed one is heard of no more, whilst the other returns alone to give thanks, and to sit at the feet of Jesus, clothed and in his right mind. On the return from 'the other side' different forms of disease, and disease in its different stages of development, even in its last development of supervening death, disease in the passing and disease in the rising generation, are the subjects which each read their lesson, and symbolize the attitude which Christ would still fain assume towards those who were so persistently and wilfully turning from Him. Then follows a second and final visit to Nazareth, and a short Circuit of special teaching in its immediate neighbour- hood. The first stage of the Diaconate of the Apostles is now brought to a close, and about the time of the year when our Lord Himself first left Nazareth and went forth to receive the Baptism of the Holy Spirit before commencing His own Ministry, that is, at or about the Feast of Dedication, when the Temple in which the Godhead truly dwelt was dedicated clvi GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. to the service of man, at this time the Apostles first receive their commission, a commission extending, as S. Matthew .shews us, not only to that immediate experimental mission, in which like birds first flying from the nest, they were to put to the test their yet undeveloped powers, but to the far greater work, which in the fulness of their strength, and in combination with others called into the vineyard at a later hour, they were to accomplish, even the founding of the Church of Christ so that the gates of Hell should not prevail against it. And now once more, when yet another and decisive step is taken in the onward movement, the fact that with John the Baptist the Law has come finally to an end is brought out with singularly vivid power and distinctness. The actual death of John, coincident as it would seem to have been with the sending out of the Apostles, was yet for some time unknown to them, and the tidings of it, for which they were still unprepared, brings them back in haste, and grievously disconcerted, to Christ. They are taken to 'the other side' to rest awhile, and thither are drawn the multitudes of the people, who at that Paschal Season are at once fed with that food, which was an emblem of the True Bread, which on the following Passover should be broken upon the Cross, and thenceforward distributed to all who would receive it by those selected for that very purpose. Passing over the many significant circumstances, which still further serve to remind us by anticipation of all that was to happen when another year had passed — Christ's temporary separation from the Disciples, His miraculously rejoining THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. clvii them walking upon the waters, the bold protestations, the failure, and the recovery of S. Peter, the reassurance of the rest of the disciples, and the immediate gaining of the desired haven, we may pause for a moment to recall the first immediate effect of the miracle of the Loaves. The men from both sides now indeed gather round Christ, but it is only to join in murmuring against Him ; and so little can they receive the fuller teaching, which their murmurings draw from Him, that many even of those who had previously been His followers instead of being drawn closer to Him by this manifestation of Divine love make it the occasion of forsaking Him. The Twelve alone, speaking by the mouth of S. Peter, reaffirm their faith and allegiance, declaring that there is no other to whom they can go, and that He alone has the words of Eternal Life, and is indeed the Holy One of God. But though thus rejected and forsaken by those who had hitherto shewn most signs of listening to His teaching, Christ will not reject or forsake them. Yet again, first at Capernaum itself, and then in the surrounding districts, the evidences of His sympathy and compassion are more numerous than ever. " Where soever He entered into villages or into cities or into the country, they laid the sick in the marketplaces, and besought Him, that they might touch if it were but the border of His garment, and as many as touched were made whole." But Christ had 'other sheep which were not of that fold, ' and those also He must bring, so that, if they would, all might be made One Fold and One Shepherd. Accordingly, from this point in the Ministry, during the h. g. m clviii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. last few months which preceded the Transfiguration, we follow our Lord no longer through Jewish, but Gentile territory. With a single exception, when the advance was at once rejected, no direct overtures are during this period made to the Jews. Whilst even the very miracles which are wrought are so performed, and so related, as to bear unmis- takeable witness to the essential difference between the attitude which Christ designed to assume towards those, to whom He was indeed sent, but by whom He was rejected, and those to whom He was not sent and who yet welcomed, and even sought after, Him. The summer Circuit of the fourth and last year of the Ministry thus devoted to work amongst the Gentiles, is remarkable in several ways. It is remarkable as being the last Circuit before the active Ministry of our Lord was brought to an end by the Transfiguration, and before Jerusalem takes the place of Capernaum as the centre, to and from which the Gospel narrative continually conducts us. But it is still more remarkable for the teaching by which it is introduced, and of which it forms the practical illus- tration. Thought for thought, if not word for word, the teaching is the same as that which was afterwards, and under almost precisely parallel circumstances, given to S. Peter by vision on the housetop at Joppa. Its burden is " what God hath cleansed make not thou common." Thrown into more strictly didactic form, and turning chiefly upon the manner in which Jewish exclusiveness was fostered by, and veiled under, the unreality, and general abuse, of religious ob- servances, it is yet the same teaching, which was after- THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. clix wards to be so fully developed when the Pharisees' treat- ment of the Publicans and Sinners, the Lazars and Pariahs of their religious world, were to become the subject of such moving contrast with the love towards such of the Father and of the Son, and when the causes and the consequences of the conduct of the Pharisees were to be exposed with such terribly progressive force and circumstantiality. In the first and chief incident in this final Circuit wc find, as usual, the principles, upon which throughout the whole course of it Christ designed to act, fully pointed out. Desiring to emphasize the contrast between the way in which the Jews and the Gentiles respectively received Him, He would not allow His presence in the district to which He now goes, — apparently either close to, or at, Sarepta, — to be publicly made known, and so makes more conspicuous the fact that the mere fame of the works, which, even in their actual performance, had produced so little effect among the Jews, was sufficient to induce one of the heathen at once to seek Him out in her distress. To the same end the whole conversation with this ' woman of Canaan ' is directed. She is ready to admit not only the priority of the claim of the Jews, as God's children, and that she herself belongs to a race which the Jews had ever spoken of as outcasts, * but,' she would argue, 'it could never be, that He, of all others, would be the one to insist upon pressing this dis- tinction. He at least would recognize that both Jews and Gentiles, children and dogs, had a common Master, who in His compassion would never refuse to give of the super- fluity of the one to feed the other.' m 2 clx GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. Thus commenced as it would seem either very close to, or at, Sarepta a city of Sidon — a place so pointedly alluded to by our Lord on a former occasion — the present Circuit seems to have extended first northwards, through the district of Sidon, then through, or rather up and down, as the word used expresses, the thickly peopled region of the ten cities, then along "the other" or eastern side of the Sea of Galilee, then, after a single ineffectual renewal of inter- course with the Jews at the southern end of the sea of Galilee, back again to the northern end, then still further northwards through the district of Caesarea Philippi, — a city, which from its associations, indicated both by the name which it then bore and by its former name of Paneas, was peculiarly representative both of ancient heathen super- stitions and more recent Gentile dominion, — and finally ends beyond Dan, and the sources of the Jordan, and the extremest limits of Northern Palestine at Mount Lebanon. The central incident of this final Circuit, the Feeding after "three days" of the four thousand with seven loaves, as con- trasted with the previous feeding of the five thousand with five loaves, is like so many other incidents sufficiently interpreted by the place it occupies in the narrative, when once the order of that narrative has been ascertained ; the numbers four and seven being just as uniformly symbolical of universality and completeness as the number five is of everything essentially Jewish. Of the crowning incident, the conclusion of this final Circuit and of the Galilaean Ministry, we can only think in the words in which S. Peter in later life recalled its amazing incidents, when he wrote " For we did not follow cunningly devised fables, when we THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. clxi made known unto you the power and presence of our Lord Jesus Christ, but we were eye-witnesses of His majesty. For He received from God the Father honour and glory, when there came such a voice to Him from the excellent glory, This is My Beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased ; and this voice we ourselves heard come out of Heaven, when we were with Him on the holy mount" (2 Peter i. 16 -18). That the Transfiguration took place on the Day of Atone- ment, though according to the present arrangement of S. Luke's text it would be impossible to place it upon that day, is shewn as clearly by the evidences connected with the incident itself as by the position which it so naturally occupies when S. Luke's original order has been restored. The mention of the "eight days" during which Christ went with the three Disciples into a mountain to pray would exactly answer to the duration and character of the obser- vances enjoined upon the High Priest as a preparation for the due observance of the One and only great Day of National Humiliation commanded by the Jewish Law. The exceeding whiteness of the Garments of Christ "so as no fuller on earth could white them" is an equally evident allusion to the white garments which formed the special dress of the High Priest on that day. The near approach of the Feast of Tabernacles, which began five days after the Day of Atonement, would go far towards supporting the view that S. Peter's question, "Shall we build here three Tabernacles?" had its natural origin in the supposition that our Lord intended to prolong His sojourn on the Mount, and to celebrate the Feast of Tabernacles with His Heavenly Visitants. clxii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. The importance of being able thus to identify the actual time of the Transfiguration is obvious. It affords a simple and perfectly natural answer to a sceptical objection, which has always been regarded as wholly unanswerable, viz. that no mention is made at all in the Gospels of a day which was certainly in the Old Testament recognized as the greatest and most typically significant in the whole year. At the same time it wonderfully intensifies the significance of all S. Paul's allusions to Christ as our Great High Priest. Whilst on the other hand S. Paul's allusions reflect their own light upon the Gospel narrative, and explain the figurative import of details, the meaning of which we should be otherwise apt to lose sight of. The close connexion between the special sacrifices of the Day of Atonement and our Lord's choice of this season for first fully revealing His approaching sufferings might well, if additional arguments were needed, be urged as affording an appropriate reason for the particular time chosen for this revelation being first made to the three Disciples, who had been permitted to be with Him on so memorable an occasion. Passing over the various considerations suggested by all the circumstances more immediately following upon the Transfiguration we must pause for a moment upon those scenes which, in S. Matthew's and S. Mark's Gospels form the definite conclusion of the Galibean Ministry, and which are thus brought into greater prominence by the entire silence which those Evangelists maintain as to the events of the next few months. Arrived once more, and for the last time at Capernaum — unless indeed Christ .came back again as far north as THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. clxiii Capernaum, after His visit to the Feast of Tabernacles — our Lord prefaces a prolonged course of instruction, addressed to the Disciples, first by shewing that any payment of Temple dues would be inconsistent with His Divinity, and then by miraculously providing those dues, thus at once avoiding giving any cause of offence to the Jews, and guarding against any misconception as to His true character on the part of the Disciples. The discourse, which immediately follows upon this act, forms the central one of the five more marked occasions on which our Lord is represented as giving detailed instruction to the Apostles for their future guidance. The occasion and the scene of each of these five dis- courses are in singular harmony with their subject. During the Three Days' Teaching — commencing with the Parable of the Sower, and thus reminding us of the later teaching, " Except a corn of wheat fall into the ground and die, it abideth alone, but if it die, it bringeth forth much fruit" — the subject of the instruction given was as to the nature of the Kingdom of God, and the part which the Apostles were to take in those events which were to lead up to its final establishment so soon as the Jewish Dis- pensation should once for all be brought to an end by the destruction of Jerusalem. The occasion was the return from that prolonged circuit of preaching, the first after the formal appointment of the Apostles. The scene was the centre of His labour, 'the house' in which he had deigned to make His residence. The next formal teaching was on the Apostles being first sent forth to make independent trial of the powers given to clxiv GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. them in His own personal absence, and the subjects of teaching are again limited to those specially suited to the occasion. The discourse at Capernaum, spoken at a time which in two of the Gospels is represented as marking the actual close of the personal Ministry of Christ Himself, accordingly begins to regard the Apostles as henceforward the responsible agents in rearing the edifice, of which the foundations were now well-nigh laid, and turns upon the due exercise of the ministerial powers which were to be entrusted to them, the absolute necessity of avoiding personal jealousies and rivalry, and of observing certain principles which he lays down both for regulating their mutual relations with each other and .their conduct towards all with whom their work would bring them into contact. With regard to the two remaining instances of special teaching, (i) the higher spiritual teaching following imme- diately upon the Last Supper, and (2) the warnings and words of instruction suggested by the prediction of the actual overthrow of the Jewish Temple, we need only point out that they constitute at least equally striking instances of the manner in which the occasion and the scene of instruc- tion must have combined to bring home its subject with the greatest possible force to the minds of those to whom it was addressed. We now arrive at a period of our Lord's history which, in exact accordance with the general plan of their Gospels, S. Luke and S. John alone record, the former recounting the more distinctly historical incidents, the significance of which had reference mainly to the actual progress of events, whether THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. clxv in the present or the future, and the latter dealing especially with the higher doctrinal teaching and the incidents out of which such teaching grew. What, at least with reference to the two first Gospels, we may thus call the supplementary narratives of S. Luke and S. John commence with the record by S. John of a journey, " taken as it were in secret," to the Feast of Tabernacles. The distinction between this journey and the next one, recorded by S. Luke, when our Lord went up to the Feast of Dedication, would appear to have been originally marked by one of those exceedingly minute and apparently incidental notes of time, which like so many other peculiarities in the Gospels seem designedly to insist upon a close study, rather than a casual reading, of them, as a first condition of any adequate conception of their mutual relations. If we accept Tatian's reading of S. John, as it comes to us in the only existing Commentary on his Diatessaron, we must suppose that no such reading as is found in our received text was known in the Second Century, the Commentator, who himself died in the year 378 especially remarking, ' He said not I go not up to this Feast, but I go not up at this Feast,' thereby implying that our present reading had indeed already come into vogue, but was clearly erroneous, our Lord's words ?iot applying to the journey to Jerusalem, but to the fact that, though He was now going again to that city, His hour as He said was not yet come, and that His voluntary 'going up upon the cross' was not to take place at that feast1. S. Luke on the other hand defines the journey which he 1 See p. 234. clxvi GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. next describes as being undertaken "when the days were well-nigh come that He should be taken up" (Luke ix. 5i)- The events which S. John records in connexion with the visit to the Feast of Tabernacles mark the beginning of the end to which S. Luke on again taking up his narrative at once alludes in the above words. The setting-forth in the plainest terms of His Divine character and of the nature of His mission, His exposure of the fallacy of hopes resting solely upon a mere natural descent from Abraham, His definitions of a state of moral servitude and of true freedom, His invitation "If any man thirst let him come unto Me," His declaration "I am the Light of the World," now lead to the attempt to arrest Him which issues in the discomfiting report of the officers " Never man so spake," and finally to the attempt to stone Him, before which He retires. Having returned for the last time to Galilee, and probably to Capernaum, Christ immediately starts again on the more public journey, which was to occupy the whole period intervening between the Feast of Tabernacles and the Feast of Dedication. Of this journey the main incident is the Mission of the Seventy ; this being preceded by an account of the warnings addressed to those who, without counting the cost of so doing, might offer themselves for the service for which volunteers were now required, and being followed by a record of the rejoicing of Christ over the results of that mission — a rejoicing corresponding with, or at least remind- ing us of, the rejoicing expressed over the immediate result of His own first preaching to the Samaritans. THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. clxvii The feelings of rejoicing thus excited issue at once in the moving invitation, " Come unto me all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest", whilst the invitation itself, as S. Luke shews us1, exactly synchronized with the exquisite parable The Good Samaritan, in which Christ first begins to describe at length His own feelings and conduct towards those with whom Jewish orthodoxy would in ordinary times have no dealings, and from whom, even in their sorest distress, the Priest and Levite turned, passing by on the other side. The next incident, the visit to Martha and Mary, sets Christ before us as actually arrived at Jerusalem for the Feast of Dedication, and already sojourning, as He did at the ensuing Passover, at Bethany. If we were obliged to accept the reading of the Author- ized Version we should now be met with the single instance in which a comparison of the Gospels of S. John and S. Luke would leave room to doubt what was the exact order of the events which they record as it were in alternate strains. In the Authorized Version the eighth chapter of S. John concludes with the words "going through the midst of them and so passed by" ; whilst the ninth chapter begins "And as he passed by, he saw a man blind from his birth." By omitting the words at the end of the eighth chapter, for which there is no sufficient authority, the Revised Version shews us where S. John intended to conclude his account of the teaching at the Feast of Tabenacles. At the *& 1 See p. 252. clxviii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. same time by thus breaking the imaginary connexion between the eighth and ninth chapters which the unau- thorized addition had established, it enables us to take up the narrative again in its proper order as soon as S. Luke has done his part in accounting for the interval between the Feasts, and has brought our Lord to a place at which He might be assumed to be residing when the next teaching recorded by S. John took place. Once more then Christ is at Jerusalem, this time at the Feast of Dedication. Once more " one work," and that performed on the Sabbath, serves with the teaching to which it gave rise to excite the Pharisees to the highest pitch of indignation. Whilst the claim to Divine power and authority put forth by Christ with such startling plainness in answer to the demand " How long dost thou hold us in suspense? If thou be the Christ tell us plainly," again compels Christ's immediate de- parture from the city. S. John now tells that our Lord went away again "beyond Jordan into the parts where John was at the first baptizing," adding " and there He abode," or tarried — the expression being the same as is used to express the duration of the first Ministry in Judaea, which lasted somewhat more than a month. The necessity for turning again to S. Luke to see how the narrative is carried forward obliges us to observe at this point a reference in his Gospel to John's disciples. Observ- ing what S. John tells us about the comparison which the people of the district instituted between the Baptist and Christ, we at once recognize one of those slight but unmistakeable means of identifying the locality of each THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. clxix record which the parallel narratives of S. John and S. Luke so continually afford. As the request now made to Christ, " Lord teach us to pray, even as John also taught his disciples" affords one of the most remarkable instances of the way in which the confusing of S. Luke's order prevents us attaching to an event the significance which when related in his original order would obviously have belonged to it, I have thought it best to deal with this incident separately. (See Chapter VIII.) At the same time it may be well to point out how naturally, and with what singular force, the teaching which arose out of this request leads up to, and combines with, the incident which we are obliged to place next to it. No sooner has S. Luke related the emphatic assurances which Christ gave as to the certainty of prayer to the Father being answered, than S. John takes up the train of thought by recording the prayer which Martha and Mary, in such simple and unquestioning faith, made to Christ on behalf of their brother Lazarus \ the whole story, carried on now by one and now by the other Evangelist, illustrating the manner in which such prayers, though for a time they may seem to be disregarded, are really answered with a measure of mercy and love far exceeding anything which those who made them expected. We now enter upon what would appear to be a clearly defined period of seven days, ending with three days of special teaching; these three days again commencing, as the previous Three Days' Teaching commenced, on a Friday, and ending, with the crowning miracle of the Resurrection of Lazarus on the First Day of the week. clxx GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. Any one who at all realizes the exclusiveness of the Gospels with regard to all matters which are not intended to lend some special force to the narrative will at once observe, (i) the coincidence of certain very exact notes of time being found at this point both in S. John and S. Luke, and (2) that though, as S. Luke now stands, there can be no connexion between them, yet, when the narratives are seen to run parallel to each other, they manifestly combine to make up a complete record of a week. S. John's narrative, it will be seen, supplies the record of the beginning and the end of the week, whilst that of S. Luke marks the progress of events lying between the two extremes. The points of time specified in S. John and S. Luke are — 1. The day on which the messengers from Bethany arrived. 2. The two days after their departure, during which Christ refrained from taking any action in the matter. 3. The day on which Christ having told His disciples that Lazarus was fallen asleep proposed to go to awaken him from sleep. As Lazarus was raised after being dead four days, the day of his death would seem to have coincided with the day on which Christ when explaining the words He had first used declared "Lazarus is dead". 4. A special period of three days spoken of as "to-day, to-morrow, and the third day". It will be seen that S. Luke here, as in the case of the Three Days' Teaching at Capernaum, enables us to recog- nize the days of the week referred to by identifying one of them with the Sabbath. As we follow the narrative we can hardly fail to be THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. clxxi struck with the manner in which the subject of each day's teaching appears to be designedly suited to the exact day on which the teaching was given. The Subjects of the Friday are few but very significant. i. 'The narrow door' of suffering the only means of access to the kingdom of God, and the prophecy that the Jews will not, and the Gentiles will, enter in by that door. 2. The combination of the Pharisees, not now with Herodians, but with Herod himself, in a plot to kill Christ, and the triumphant evidence which on the third day will be given of the futility of that plot. The subjects of the Sabbath teaching are: — i. The healing of a man which had the dropsy. Here is the evidence of a writer of the first century as to the character of this disease rendering it, next to leprosy, the most striking emblem of the corrupting power of sin : "The dropsy is an unsightly and very grievous disease, rarely cured by mortals; for either lurking internally in some vital organ, it depraves the whole body : or else the whole body, first affected by some pestilential malady, converts the internal organs into depraved humours, both conspiring for the patient's destruction1." 2. The pride and self-seeking of the Pharisees and the need for them rather to make the poor, the maimed, the lame and the blind, partakers of the blessings which they have the power to dispense. 3. The excuses which those who were first invited into the kingdom of God made for declining the invitation, and the result which would follow. 1 Aretseus, 124. Quoted by Mr McClellan. clxxii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. The subjects of the third day at once carry us into a new region of thought and revelation. They are — 1. The danger of persons under-estimating the sacrifices which Christ's service will involve. 2. Christ receiving and eating with Publicans and sinners and the offence thus caused to the Pharisees. 3. The relative position in God's sight of Publicans and sinners and of the Pharisees denned by the Parables of the Lost Sheep, the Lost Piece of Silver and the Prodigal Son. In the latter parable the attitude of the elder brother, and of the father coming out to entreat him, exactly repre- sent the then historical position of events — The Father, speaking by Christ, entreating the Pharisees on behalf of Publicans and sinners, and they refusing to be entreated. At this point the curtain as it were drops for a moment, and the ultimate result as it affects all parties concerned is left for development in the next parables. 4. The abused responsibilities of the Pharisees, the opportunity yet afforded them for a tardy repentance, and the effect which such a repentance would have upon their future relations with those whom God has accepted but they have despised. Under the figure of an oppressive Steward, who has for years rack-rented his Master's tenants, and that simply for his own benefit, Christ exposes the true character of the oppressive conduct of the Pharisees in binding on men's shoulders burdens grievous to be borne, and which nothing would induce them to make the slightest movement to remove or lighten. The Steward was wise, and at the last moment of his stewardship gave new and reasonable leases, THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. clxxiii a course which though it did not prevent his dismissal, secured his masters commendation, and the future good- will of those whom he had so long ill-used. The Pharisees might yet do likewise. 5. The demonstration of the fallacy of the arguments by which the Pharisees attempted to justify their actions. 6. The final result of the Pharisees' persevering in the course they were adopting. Their spiritual privileges had not been given them for the purposes of selfish indulgence. Their neglect of those in the last stage of spiritual destitution was wholly inexcus- able, and would certainly result in an entire reversal of the relative positions which they and the publicans and sinners then occupied. By the time this teaching of the third day was ended the time drew near for it to be enforced by the greatest of all the exhibitions of Christ's Divine power. Probably while the last words of the Parable of Dives and Lazarus "If they hear not Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rose from the dead" were yet sounding in the ears of those to whom they were addressed, the company came within sight of Bethany, and the terrible exactness of the prophecy began to be verified. How the immediate result of the Resurrection of Lazarus more than fulfilled the prediction by which it was so immediately preceded it is hardly necessary to point out. Though many of the people were indeed persuaded, the miracle was so far from persuading the Pharisees, that it served only to stimulate them to fresh and more crafty efforts to compass the death of Him who had so spoken. h. g. n clxxiv GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. The immediate effect upon Christ Himself of this new- outbreak of hostility is threefold. It leads Him (i) first to insist upon the terrible responsi- bility incurred by those who led others astray, (2) to dwell upon the duty of all to exercise to the utmost the virtues of forbearance, long-suffering and forgiveness towards any who may sin against them, and (3) to retire Himself to a distance and so for the time to put it beyond the power of the Pharisees to carry out their purposes with regard to Him. Leaving Bethany, Christ now chooses for His place of sojourn during the few weeks which had yet to elapse before His final visit to Jerusalem a city called Ephraim, a place, "in the country near to the wilderness." That Ephraim was identical with Ophrah of the Old Testament, and was situated some thirty miles to the north of Jerusalem, in the district lying between upper and lower Galilee would seem to be on the whole the most probable supposition, and one which is confirmed by the mention in S. Luke of the sycamine tree, which is said to flourish only within a very limited area and in this immediate locality1. As in the case of our Lord's residence at the place where John at first baptized, so now S. Luke mentions only a single illustrative incident, indicating that on this, as on the former occasion, the instruction of the Disciples rather than public teaching chiefly occupied our Lord's attention. Prayer was the subject of instruction then, Faith and Obedience is the subject now. Having remained at Ephraim until within a few days of the Passover, our Lord, most probably joining at this point 1 See Greswell's Diss., Vol. II. p. 536. THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. clxxv the Galilasan company going up to Jerusalem, passes through the district lying between Samaria to the South and Galilee to the North, and thus, crossing the Jordan, enters Peraea. The first incidents of this last journey are recorded by S. Luke alone, S. Matthew and S. Mark recommencing their long-suspended narratives at a later stage in the journey. The ingratitude of the nine Jewish lepers as compared with the gratitude of the single Samaritan stranger ; The discourse on the future establishment of the Kingdom of God; The Parable of the Widow and the Unjust Judge, by which Christ shews His disciples that as even the injustice of the Roman Authorities1 will not be proof against the constant complaints of His suffering servants — represented under the image of a widow — so they need have no fear but that God's justice and mercy will lead Him to listen to the prayers of those who are His elect and who will cry to Him day and night; The Parable of the Pharisee and Publican, shewing the grounds of the preference which previous parables had declared would be given to those, whom in spite of all the murmurings which His conduct excited, He was now receiving into close communion with Himself; The discourse on the law of divorce ; The blessing of little children ; 1 Thus Dean Milman in his History of the Jews, Vol. II. p. 171, mentions that Claudius, though "generally favourable to the race of Israel," on one occasion closed their synagogues and expelled the Jews from Rome, an act which he attributes to a tumult caused by their persecution of the Christians. n 2 clxxvi GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. The danger of men trusting (i) in riches which were likely to hinder them as they did the young ruler, (2) even in such meritorious works as those on which the Apostles were inclined to rest their hopes of reward ; The Parable of the Labourers in the Vineyard, in which the Apostle's mistaken notions as to the rewards due to their past services are dealt with, and they are shewn that many who like S. Stephen should be last called in point of time should yet be first in receiving their reward ; The fuller prediction of His own sufferings, and the necessity for those who wished to attain to a high position in His Kingdom being partakers of these sufferings ; The incidents of the visit to Jericho, the priestly city, where there are said to have been no fewer than 12,000 priests: 12,000, that is, of those who were termed by Christ "blind leaders of the blind," and whose hostility was so especially excited by His reception of publicans and sinners ; The healing of blind men both on entering and leaving the city ; The making the house of a Chief Publican his place of sojourn, and the emphatic assertion that to him — though probably not a Jew at all — salvation had that day come, as to a true son of Abraham \ The Parable of the Nobleman going into a far country, addressed to those who thought that His impending visit to Jerusalem pointed to the immediate establishment of His Kingdom ; The further correction of the same mistake by the recognition of Mary's act as an anointing for His burial; All these incidents of The Last Journey, which to a THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. clxxvii casual reader might easily seem to have little connexion with each other, and might even at first sight seem to give something of a fragmentary character to the narrative, are found, when carefully compared, to advance the history stage by stage towards its completion, and to shew an unmistakeable evidence of order and design. Nor in looking back over the whole history can we find a single point at which this evidence of order and design fails. Progress and development and a continual deepening of tone and colour seem to mark the gradual and orderly advance of the narrative to the climax towards which it so often declares itself to be tending. At the same time we are conscious that all this beauty and symmetry of design is simply the result of implicitly following with a single exception the exact order, in all cases of three, and in most, of all four Evangelists. The question then we have to ask ourselves is this, Is it possible to conceive that such a narrative, and one which with only a single exception brings all the Gospels as they now stand into such absolute accord, can be the result of a mere random, unauthorized, and unneces- sary alteration, an alteration too so great that, if it really interfered with instead of restoring the text of S, Luke, it could only be expected thoroughly to confuse his ' order ; and to put it altogether out of harmony with that of the other Evangelists ? It is not as though the foregoing outline were the result of arguments or conjectures and involved a series of altera- tions, now of one and now of another of the Gospels. From beginning to end the outline is simply the exact reproduction clxxviii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. of the story which, this one alteration being made, the Gospels themselves present. It is not even open to any one to object that without this alteration the general drift of the Gospel narrative is still perfectly plain. It is admittedly not so. Not only is it impossible without very many alterations to produce any connected history at all, but when with such alterations such a history is produced, it depends upon such a multitude of conjectures and arguments and leaves so small a portion of any one Gospel intact that it must at best seem of very questionable authority. At the same time the absence of any distinctly recognizable plan in narratives thus constructed makes it singularly difficult to understand them, and still more difficult to remember all the various alterations of the several Gospels which they involve. Supposing the one alteration now contended for to be declared inadmissible, scarcely any two parts of the out- line of the narrative above given will hold together. Throughout the whole of the last year and a half of the Ministry all the minutely accurate agreements between the several Gospels must be not only purely imaginary but altogether contrary to the facts of the case. Disallow the one correction of S. Luke's text, and at every turn incidents distinctly affirmed by one Evangelist to have happened on the same day or about the same date are as distinctly affirmed by another Evangelist to have happened at an altogether different time. Whilst neither the same days, seasons, nor even years can be assigned to events which are certainly recognized by different Evangelists as the same. The very fact that, with the one exception which THE FOUR YEARS' MINISTRY. clxxix S. Luke's text presents, absolute order can be shewn to reign supreme in the Gospels makes the existence of contradictions of this sort absolutely incredible. On what ground then can any one refuse to recognize the fact that S. Luke himself never could have been the Author of the confusion which the received version of his Text involves? The facts of the case have hitherto been dealt with in two ways. (i) One class of persons claim to make many arbitrary and conjectural alterations which they do not attempt to reconcile with the accuracy of the documents dealt with. Can they with any shew of consistency refuse to accept a single alteration, for which a vast body of evidence is forthcoming, and which produces at once perfect agree- ment between the several narratives ? (2) Others, in spite of all appearances to the contrary, argue that historical order was not an essential part of the design of the Gospels. But when it is proved that a single alteration of a possible error shews a uniform historical order to dominate the arrangement of every fact in at least three of the Gospels, and throughout a great part of the fourth, can a contention, previously open to so many objections, be for one moment sustained? What is there then in either of these alternatives to set against the fact that, even as the Gospels now stand, the recognition of a single error in one of them is sufficient to prove that there is absolutely no other deduction to be made from the inviolable accuracy which we feel instinctively must belong to documents so accredited as the Gospels to the hearts and consciences of men ? CHAPTER VIII. S. LUKE'S TESTIMONY TO CHRIST'S DIVINITY OBSCURED BY THE DIS- PLACEMENT OF HIS TEXT Proposition in enumeration of proofs. That the revised order of S. Luke's text brings out into bold relief the most emphatic evidence which his Gospel contains of the Divinity of our Lord, and reveals a remarkable coincidence of testimony on this subject between his Gospel and that of S. John. Why did our Lord at one time excuse His Disciples for not praying, and at another not only teach them to pray but even enforce prayer upon them as a duty ? It is true that on the first occasion He was replying to a merely captious question of His avowed enemies, but even to such it was His custom to give a true answer, and one, which so long as the circumstances remained the same, would be as true at one time as at another. The reason why they did not pray or fast like John's disciples He declared to be that such exercises were incom- patible with the relations existing between them and Himself. He was the Bridegroom, they were the Bride- groom's friends. When He was taken away from them it would be necessary for them to fast and pray, but until then it was not so. THE PARABLE OF THE LOAVES. clxxxi As S. Luke's text now stands, the request 'Lord teach us to pray as John also taught his disciples' appears as having been made whilst the relations between Christ and the Disciples continued to be just what they were when the subject was first discussed. Hence the difficulty of ex- plaining the apparent inconsistency between what our Lord said upon one occasion and what He said and did upon another. But the moment we know that the whole of that part of S. Luke's Gospel in which this second incident is dealt with really belongs to quite the end of the Ministry, and that it has only been thrown back to an earlier period by earlier events having been wrongly inserted after it, the difficulty disappears. The time we see is already at hand to which on the first occasion he had alluded. Already, "the days were well-nigh come that He should be received up " ; and this fact alone constitutes a sufficient reason for our Lord's doing then what He had not thought it necessary to do before. But even with this explanation there is much that we cannot at once wholly understand. Supposing that the time had really arrived for such teaching to be given, why did our Lord need to be asked to give it ? why should it be regarded as a mere concession to 'importunity'? and why should the whole incident be re- corded in such a way as to suggest to the sceptic so many objections, and oblige the Commentator to offer such elaborate explanations to prove that, in the Parable which follows the granting of the request, God is not, as He appears to be, represented as acting upon merely human and even unworthy motives ? clxxxii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. The answer to all these difficulties which I venture to suggest is that the present state of S. Luke's text has so obscured the circumstances of the case, and with them the whole drift of the argument, that we have been driven to content ourselves with the mere surface meaning of the Parable, and entirely to disregard the underlying meaning which it was designed to veil. The whole force of the Parable I imagine to turn upon the double meaning of the word which we render impor- tunity, but which primarily means dulness of comprehension and want of due sensitiveness, being in fact the same word used in the well-known passage in the Odyssey describing the insensibility of the stone to the labours of Sisyphus in keeping it in constant motion. It is this dulness of comprehension and spiritual insen- sibility on the part, not of all, but of one of the Disciples against which Christ makes remonstrance, even whilst, in consideration of His own departure being now near at hand, He grants the request made to Him. Even so far as the surface meaning is concerned the idea is rather of shamelessness than importunity. The request was an altogether unreasonable one. It so happened indeed that it probably did but cause our Lord to anticipate what He would shortly have done without being asked, but none the less did it imply that in not having done it before, He had undervalued and been unmindful of a duty clearly recognized by John. The Parable is thus at once an explanation of the motives which induced our Lord to grant the request, and a remon- strance against the aneideia (a word the double meaning of which no translation can render) which prompted it. THE PARABLE OF THE LOAVES, clxxxiii The whole Parable is but the same teaching in a some- what more veiled form which was again given at a later time, possibly to the same Disciple, when in answer to the request "Shew us the Father," Christ said, "Have I been so long time with you and yet hast thou not known Me, Philip ? He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father; how sayest thou then shew us the Father? Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me? the words that I speak unto you, I speak not of Myself, but the Father that dwelleth in Me, He doeth the works. Believe me, that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me, or else believe Me for the very works' sake." If we bear in mind (i) that the Parable was especially addressed to the Disciples, and (2) the sharp distinction which our Lord so often draws between the natural and the spiritual life, we have at once a key both to the peculiarity of the form in which the Parable is cast, and to a great part of the exact phraseology used. Christ does not say as usual "a certain man" but "which of you". Under the figure of a friend who has been on a journey, He represents that spiritual part of the disciple's being, which had been lying dormant, but was now reasserting itself. A modern teacher designing to convey the same meaning more openly, would have said of the man and the friend who came to him "now the name of the one was Sarx, and the name of the other Pneuma." The other figures used are all couched in language with the meaning of which our Lord's teaching at other times makes us perfectly familiar. He is Himself the one Friend to Whom any one of the clxxxiv GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. Disciples might naturally turn. " Ye are my friends." " I have called you friends." He too is " The Door." The figure of the loaves is one so often used to express spiritual gifts as to make it almost impossible to apply it in any other way, and to interpret it literally would only be to lay ourselves open to the remonstrance, " How is it that ye do not perceive that I spake not to you concerning loaves?" Here the expression ' three loaves' finds its natural expla- nation in the prayer which has given rise to the parable, the personal petitions of which are threefold, (i) the petition for daily bread, (2) the petition for forgiveness, and (3) that for special protection from evil. The very words of the first petition would evidently suggest the carrying on of the same figure of speech. Again the term ' children' exactly expresses the relation in which Christ ever represents Himself as standing to the Disciples, "Ye are my children," as He says on another occasion. The manner in which at a later period Christ speaks of having "kept" the Disciples could hardly be more forcibly or beautifully expressed than under the figure here used of their being " with Him in the marriage-bed (eh rrjv kolttjv), and the door being shut." Following out the ideas thus suggested we should then read the Parable as follows — S. Luke xi. 5—8. 5 And he said unto them, And He said unto them, Which of Which of you shall have a you shall have such a friend as in very friend, deed I am to you and shall go unto him at and in the spiritual darkness as of midnight, midnight which envelopes you, shall go to him THE PARABLE OF THE LOAVES. clxxxv and say unto him, Friend, lend me three loaves ; 6 for a friend of mine in his journey is come to me, and I have nothing to set before him ? 7 and he from within {ZawOev) shall answer and say, Trouble me not : the door is now shut, my children are with me in bed ; I cannot rise {dvaards) and give thee. 8 I say unto you, Though he will not rise (avaards) and give him, because he is his friend, yet because of his im- portunity he will rise {eyepdels) and give him as many as he needeth. and say unto Him, Friend, grant me as a loan three kinds of necessary spiri- tual food, daily sustenance, forgiveness and divine protection for my soul, which is dear to me, and which has been as it were upon a journey but has returned and is reassert- ing itself, craves for that which I have no means of supplying to it. And He, veiled from your sight in His merely human form, shall answer and say, Make not so unreasonable a request. Know ye not that not one only but all of you are already children of the bride- chamber, ye have entered in by Me, the Door, and the Door is closed. Your union with me is perfect, and that union gives you all these things which you ask1. I cannot anticipate my resurrection and bestow what I have already given you. Nevertheless (to explain what I have now done and the directions I am about to give) I say unto you Though he will not give what you ask by rising and putting off this human form because of his friendship, (for as his friend he knows this to be unnecessary) yet with a view to the utter dulness of perception which dictates the request, being aroused to take some action in the matter, he will do more than lend him what he asks, he will give him all that he needs. 1 Or, supposing the rare use of 'into' or 'towards' for 'in' to indicate a double meaning, we may interpret "the marriage bed" as an expansion of a figure common to every age and language, and read clxxxvi GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. It may of course be urged that the above partakes too much of the character of what in modern times is styled the mystical and allegorical interpretation of parables. In answer I can only ask whether such an objection would not lie against the very models of interpretation which Christ Himself has provided for our guidance and for the purpose of enabling us to understand all parables, and whether the modern method of dealing with the parables does not in fact reduce them to little more than stories with a moral, making them indeed capable of many and very varied applications, but only doing so at the cost of robbing them of the under- lying and veiled meaning, which, far more than the surface meaning, gives them their appropriate place in the Gospel narratives. The interpretation above suggested certainly complies with the obvious requirements of the case. It does not leave the Parable open to the usual attack of the sceptic or require any apology from the Commentator. It is consistent with all our Lord's teaching on the same subject at other times. It has an obvious and natural connexion with the circumstances which gave rise to it. It recognizes the special application to the Disciples implied in the words ' Which of you '. The figurative language employed is the reproduction of expressions used by our Lord at other times, and is capable of being maintained with a consistency which it is almost impossible to conceive could be the case if a wrong inter- pretation had been put upon it. "with me they are moving towards the grave, the 'narrow bed' where the union between the earthly and Heavenly life is ever perfected. From this I cannot anticipate my resurrection." CHAPTER IX. THE SETTLEMENT AT BETHLEHEM. Sceptical writers are in the habit of assuming, that in the early chapters of S. Matthew and S. Luke there are certain contradictions, which nothing but the most inveterate habit of special pleading could possibly induce theologians to attempt either to deny or to explain. S. Matthew, they say, as clearly recognizes Bethlehem as the home of Joseph and Mary as S. Luke recognizes Nazareth; this recognition not being confined to distinct statements, but being observable in incidental notices running through the whole of both narratives. Thus S. Matthew, when speaking of the return from Egypt, represents Joseph as taking for granted that he will make his way back to Bethlehem ; whereas S. Luke equally takes for granted that it was in the natural order of things that Joseph and Mary returned at the earliest opportunity to Nazareth. There is an amount of 'bravery' in assumptions of this sort and in the triumphant setting forth of imagined con- tradictions which is very apt to divert attention from what is at least the ultimate issue in such cases, viz, whether it is more probable that documents so accredited as the Gospels, and writers so nearly contemporary with the events which clxxxviii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. they relate should be in error, or that the sceptic should be arguing without a sufficient knowledge of all the bearings of the facts on which he is prepared to pass so confident an opinion. It is indeed quite conceivable that there may be diffi- culties, and even apparent contradictions in Holy Scripture, which, in the present imperfect state of Biblical knowledge, it would be only presumptuous to attempt to explain. But at any rate this question of the residence at Bethlehem does not come within this category. On the contrary it is, I believe, perfectly possible to shew at least strong prima facie grounds for supposing that the opinions so confidently put forward rest upon entirely false data, and that those who hold them have either not recognized, or not given sufficient weight even to such simple facts as the following — i. That S. Luke's Gospel is not, as they assume, inde- pendent of, and to be read separately, from S. Matthew's, but that both documents contain overwhelming internal evidence of their having been designed to be read together. It is not necessary to insist that S. Luke himself in his Preface states this to be the case. It is a fact of which evidences can be multiplied to an extent which places it beyond all possibility of doubt. 2. That it is an integral part of the plan of the two Gospels at one time to relate different and evidently specially selected facts, and at another to relate the same facts in a different way. Thus in this case the more emphatic recognition by the one Evangelist of Bethlehem, and by the other of Nazareth, is only one of those phenomena of selection THE SETTLEMENT AT BETHLEHEM, clxxxix which may be shewn to recur so continually as to con- stitute them an integral part of the general design of their Gospels. 3. If we join together the early portions of the narratives of S. Matthew and S. Luke according to principles of con- struction found to prevail in every other part of their Gospels, it becomes apparent that though one Evangelist gives greater prominence to incidents of more exclusively Jewish significance, and so speaks most of Bethlehem, whilst the other deals with events having a more world-wide interest, and connects these more especially with Nazareth, yet the two narratives join to make up one complete and consistent story, which if not told exactly as ordinary writers would probably have told it, is nevertheless told according to a plan consistently pursued throughout the whole of the documents which are thus made the subject of criticism. 4. It is not correct to say that S. Luke, even when his Gospel is taken alone, fails to recognize a prolonged resi- dence at Bethlehem. 5. Luke defines the time at which the Taxing and the Journey to Bethlehem took place by the words "in those days." The expression may of course mean within a few months, or weeks, or days of some previously-mentioned event — that event being in this case the Birth and Circum- cision of John the Baptist. But up to this point all S. Luke's notes of time have been exceedingly minute, so much so that the presumption is certainly in favour of his meaning within a few days. This would make S. Luke state that Joseph and Mary went to Bethlehem about six months before our Lord's Birth, and immediately after the Angelic Announcement to h. g. 0 cxc GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. Joseph, a date strongly supported by the wording of the further statement "and it came to pass while they were there the days were fulfilled." In the above objections the residence at Bethlehem as referred to by S. Luke is assumed to have ended immediately after the Purification. But the wording of the narrative is sufficiently remarkable at this point to make it very doubtful, even apart from S. Matthew's narrative, whether S. Luke really means to say anything of the kind. What he does say is that Joseph and Mary returned to Nazareth "when they had brought to an end all the things which were according to the ordering of the Lord." He does not use the expression indicating ceremonial observances which he would have done had he referred only to the Circum- cision and the Purification and Presentation in the Temple, whilst the very comprehensiveness of the expression "all things" makes it difficult to apply it exclusively to these events. Some such expression as "after this," or "strait- way" would have been what we should have looked for, had he been referring to the Circumcision and Purification only. Thus, even when reading S. Luke's Gospel alone, we should see very strong reason to infer that there must have been some other events, capable of being defined as happening "according to the ordering of the Lord," which he had in his mind, but which he did not propose to relate. When therefore we know (i) that S. Luke's usual plan was to omit certain things more peculiarly appropriate to the plan of S. Matthew's Gospel, and (2) that not only had certain events taken place between the Purification and the Return to Nazareth, but that these events were emphatically THE SETTLEMENT AT BETHLEHEM, cxci declared by S. Matthew to be the designed fulfilment of ancient prophecies, it can hardly be unreasonable to conclude that here we have the true explanation of the peculiar wording of S. Luke's narrative, and that he does in fact recognize a residence in Bethlehem of about two years and six months, i.e. a somewhat longer period than S. Matthew's narrative taken alone would necessarily assign to it. 5. There is nothing in S. Matthew's Gospel in any way inconsistent with the above view. It is true our Lord's birth is mentioned immediately after the Angelic Announcement to Joseph, but it is re- corded in what is manifestly the very shortest of summaries, whilst the same summary carries the reader on at once to a date presumably about two years after our Lord's Birth, viz. the time of the Visit of the Wise Men. Thus no inference whatever can safely be drawn from S. Matthew as to the exact time of the visit to Bethlehem. 6. Again the inferences drawn from the use of the word which we translate ' Inn ' are at best extremely uncertain. The renewed use of the same word (/cara'Ai^a) by the same writer in describing the events of the last night before the Crucifixion, though its significance is lost in the translation Guest-chamber, strongly points to its being used in both places in a special and somewhat figurative sense. In this case it would only indicate that the place — presumably the same as S. Matthew speaks of as the 'house' — only afforded a place of temporary sojourn, even to Joseph and Mary, and not even that to Christ Himself. The opening fact of the Gospel, viz., that when Christ first entered this world there was 'no room' for Him even in a humble lodging is thus set over against the closing fact, 0 2 cxcii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. that when He was about to depart from this world he could at least speak emphatically of the place where he was to institute the Lord's Supper, as My kataluma. The evidence is all strongly against the supposition that $. Luke would be likely to use this word in two different senses at the beginning and at the end of his Gospel ; just as it is against the supposition that he meant one thing by the word Aoyos in the Preface to the Acts, and something totally different by the same word in the Preface to his Gospel. From the above suggestions it will be seen how very much really turns, in this as in so many other cases, upon the recognition of the exact relations existing between S. Luke and the other Gospels, and how many more or less pronounced difficulties may be due primarily to the fact (i) that the alleged displacement of S. Luke's text has so effectually obscured these relations through the greater portion of the Gospel narrative, and (2) that, even where these relations were not directly obscured, their apparent non-existence elsewhere made it not only practically im- possible to assume their existence, but — just at the very points where the recognition of them is of primary import- ance,— seemed to justify the exactly opposite assumption of their non-existence. CHAPTER X. A CRUCIAL QUESTION, OR THE UNNAMED FEAST OF S. JOHN v. i. " After this there was a feast of the Jews. What feast ? Methinks that of Pentecost." Thus shortly does Chrysostom dismiss a question which modern writers have ever discussed at such great length, and which is obviously of the last importance for the right understanding of the Gospel narrative. Now, as Chrysostom devotes no fewer than five lengthy Homilies to this single chapter of S. John, and as through- out his Homilies he deals in detail with every point which he deems to be one of doubt or difficulty, we may reason- ably assume that this brief dismissal of the subject is tantamount to an affirmation that when he wrote, about a.d. 398, the opinion he expressed was the generally, if not the universally, accepted view of the Church ; or, in other words, that he not only gives his own individual opinion on the subject, but assumes that no other opinion was then regarded as either tenable, or required by the context of the passage in question. In support of this conclusion we have the fact that the cxciv GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. same view was expressed shortly before by Cyril and Epiphanius, whilst we have the testimony of Calvin and Bengel that it was still generally held in the 16th and 17th centuries. In modern times, though there has been an almost universal recognition of the fact that the events recorded seem in many ways to point very strongly to the Feast of Pentecost, at the same time a still stronger and more general opinion has prevailed that the wording of S. John's narrative critically examined is inconsistent with this view. Under these circumstances the almost unanimous, though often very doubtful verdict, of modern critics has been given in favour of the Feast of Purim, a verdict arrived at, not so much on any evidence of identification, as on the purely negative grounds that, as the Feast cannot be that of Pentecost, the Feast of Purim is the only other one which from the time of year at which it took place (March) can at all satisfy the requirements both of the narrative of S. John and of the other Evangelists. In view of this conflict between ancient and modern opinion, it will be necessary in the first place to consider the reasons alleged for supposing that the Feast of Pente- cost cannot be intended by S. John. The main reason is found in the terms in which our Lord refers to John the Baptist, " He was a burning and a shining light, and ye were willing for a season to rejoice in his light" (S. Johnv. 35). The construction put upon these words we find again and again expressed by different writers to the following effect : " The words of John v. 35 imply that the ministry A CRUCIAL QUESTION. cxcv of the Baptist belonged to the past, and they may have been spoken after his death, although the only necessary ifiference is that he had ceased his public labours \" But the inference here affirmed to be necessary is directly opposed to other words of Christ spoken at the same time. " If," he says, " I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true. There is another that beareth witness of me, and I know that the witness which he witnesseth of me is true. Ye sent unto John and he bare witness of the truth, but I receive not testimony from man." Unless the words printed in italics are to be understood as referring to John's testimony, they not only become unintelligible, or as it is more euphemistically expressed * mysterious,' but the connecting link of thought and argument between the words which precede and those which follow them is entirely lost. But, it is argued, it is impossible to suppose Christ to be here speaking of John's ministry, for if so, he speaks of it as present and continuous, whereas just afterwards, he speaks of John in terms from which we ' ?iecessarily ' infer that, if he was not already dead, his ministry was at any rate a thing of the past. Why, we may first ask, should such an one as S. Chry- sostom not have perceived any such impossibility, and have seen no reason against applying the words as he does to John the Baptist? Simply because, believing that S. John's manifest intention was to represent these words to be spoken at the Feast of Pentecost, and believing that the notice of John's 1 Neander's Life of Christ. Bohn's Eng. ed. p. 238. cxcvi GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. 1 not being yet cast into prison ' must cover at the very least a period which would embrace that Feast, he did not for a moment imagine that there was any such contradiction as modern criticism suggests. He simply takes the words in their plain obvious sense, fully recognising that in speak- ing of John's testimony as a matter both of the present and of the past, our Lord was as historically correct as He was when He spoke of all that was implied in the expression " a burning light " as belonging to the earlier, and so far, past ministry of John. For, if we assume with Chrysostom that John was still at liberty and continuing his ministry, not now of prepara- tion, but of witness, which expression would our Lord have been most likely under all the known circumstances to have made use of, "John was a bright and shining light," or " John is a bright and shining light " ? Surely the former. For already, as the Pharisees well knew, John's light had been eclipsed by that of Christ Himself. All the enthusiasm of the welcome given to John, which is implied in the expressions ' a burning light,' and their ' rejoicing in that light,' was essentially a matter of the past. Though his sun had not yet set, abundant evidence was already forthcoming that it was now fast sinking below the horizon. Nor can we forget that this view of the case is in exact accordance with the reason which S. John gives for Christ going into Galilee very shortly before the Feast of Pentecost, a journey which he expressly distinguishes as taken before John's imprisonment, and which may very well have been made for the purpose of joining the Galilsean company going up to that Feast. The reason given by S. John for this journey was that Christ had then A CRUCIAL QUESTION. cxcvii received information that the Pharisees were duly certified of the fact that the Baptist was publicly declaring that his own ministry was superseded by that of Christ, and that already more persons were baptized by Christ's Disciples than by John himself. Ignore the connexion between this statement and Christ's discourse recorded in the 5th chapter of S. John, and both the statement and the discourse become alike unintelligible ; recognize it, as Chrysostom evidently does, and the meaning of both is perfectly plain. On the whole then we can see no ground whatever for the supposed ''necessary inference' on which the whole argu- ment has been made to hinge, nor any contradiction whatever in Christ speaking of John as still alive, and yet immediately afterwards speaking of the acknowledged grandeur of his ministry as a thing of the past. But, it may be asked, can the remarkable consensus of modern opinion, which has led to the general rejection of Chrysostom's opinion, be due solely to the above "necessary inference," the fallacy of which we have thus tried to establish ? Certainly not. Examining the history of the whole discussion on the subject, we find that this inference has only been so readily accepted because it fell in with and supported an assumption, the history of which in turn it is not difficult to trace, the assumption, namely, that the second journey into Galilee recorded by S. John is identical with the journey referred to by the other evangelists as the date of the com- mencement of Christ's Galilaean ministry. This assumption owes its origin to Mr Greswell, unquestionably the most distinguished of all modern cxcviii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. harmonists, and whose work has been generally accepted as the text-book of Commentators, and more or less the groundwork of all other harmonies. But Mr Greswell does not even discuss the possibility of the two journeys in question being different journeys. He simply assumes the impossibility of their being different, and substitutes ridicule for argument, when he says in effect that he never heard of any harmonist foolish enough to suppose them to be different. It is worthy of note that up to a certain point all Mr Greswell's arguments would be in favour of the two journeys being distinct, as he shews that the second visit to Cana of Galilee must have been as nearly as possible 10 days before the Feast of Pentecost. But then, suddenly assuming that this second journey into Galilee must be identical with that of which S. Matthew and S. Mark speak of as taking place after John had been cast into prison, he proceeds to point out that the words — which we should rather assume could only be required in S. John's Gospel to guard against any such assumption — "Now John was not yet cast into prison" must be taken as proving the exact date of John's imprisonment, viz. that John was cast into prison during the time of our Lord's journey from Samaria to Galilee. From which theory he deduces the extraordinary conclusion that the fourth Evangelist only misses by a day being in conflict with the first two as to the time when John was imprisoned. Before quoting Mr Greswell's own words we should point out that they refer primarily to his argument that S. John's Gospel is designedly supplemental to those of the other Evangelists, and that the first four chapters of his Gospel exactly cover the period left unnoticed by them. The curious A CRUCIAL QUESTION. cxcix reasoning by which he tries to establish this fact apparently prevents his seeing that, but for his one unproved assump- tion, all his arguments would apply with tenfold force to the first five instead of the first four chapters of S. John. Mr Greswell writes thus — " The second journey into Galilee, recorded by S. John, is either the same, or not the same with that return, recorded by the other Evangelists, which they make to precede the beginning of our Lord's Ministry there. If it is the same, one fact of our assertion is established, for from that time forward, S. John suspends and they continue the course of the subsequent history down to the arrival of the second Passover. " If it is not the same, then this second journey into Galilee must have been followed by a second journey out of it : and this second journey out of it, by a third journey into it, at least ; the two former prior to the imprisonment of John, but posterior to Jesus' residence in Judaea pre- viously specified (of none of which things is there the least hint in the Gospel history), and the last only coincident with that return into Galilee, posterior to the imprisonment of John, which was the beginning of our Lord's Ministry there. The improbability of this hypothesis is too great to require its refutation; and though it were true, yet instead of diminishing it would only enlarge the hiatus in the former accounts, nor do I know of any harmonist who maintains it. The second journey of S. John then into Galilee, may be implicitly considered the last journey, at least into Galilee, from any other quarter, before the general commencement of our Saviour's Ministry there ; in which case, the coinci- dence between his Gospel, and the Gospels of the other cc GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. three Evangelists, at one of the extreme points in particular, becomes indisputable, and the fact of this coincidence at one and the second extreme being made out, may justly be urged as a presumptive argument for the same kind of coin- cidence at the other and at the first1." In what the ' improbability of the hypothesis ' consists it is difficult to understand. Assume that the second journey into Galilee is not the same as that of the other Evangelists, and where is the supposed difficulty? It is followed by a second journey out of Galilee, viz. to the Feast of Pentecost. Both this journey into Galilee and the immediately subsequent journey out of it being prior to John's imprisonment, but posterior to Jesus' residence in Judaea. The visit to the Feast of Pentecost being neces- sarily followed by a third journey into Galilee, what can be more natural or more consistent with all the narratives than to identify this journey with that taken after John was cast into prison — John's imprisonment, and the commencement of our Lord's Galilaean Ministry, being thus fixed to a date very close to, if not immediately after, the Feast of Pen- tecost ? To avoid misapprehension it may be well to point out that the subversion of Mr Greswell's subsidiary argument does not, as it happens, affect in the least degree his main contention, which is an undoubtedly true one. We have only to include within the scope of his main argument the 5th chapter of S. John instead of stopping short at the 4th, and his subsidiary argument is no longer required, and we can at once prove its incorrectness and yet have exactly what he argues for, viz. a narrative in S. John, commencing 1 Greswell, Dissa-tations, Vol. II. p. 201. A CRUCIAL QUESTION. cci where the other Evangelists leave off and ending where they begin ; the ending of the Synoptic narratives thus pointing out the date of S. John's beginning, and S. John's ending fixing the date of their recommencement, of the narrative. But the weakest point of all in Mr GreswelFs argument is his treatment of S. John's note of time with regard to the Baptist's imprisonment. To suppose that S. John makes a statement which though true with regard to the commence- ment of a journey occupying only three days would have been untrue with regard to its conclusion will seem to many to be little short of accusing him of a wilful intention to deceive. Or to put the matter in another form, on the hypothesis that S. John did intend (as we suppose he did) to distinguish the journey into Galilee which he records from the journey alluded to by the other Evangelists as marking the com- mencement of the Galilaean ministry, is it possible to suggest words more appropriate for such a purpose than the words which he used ? S. Matthew says : "Now when Jesus heard that John was cast into prison He withdrew into Galilee." S. Mark says : " Now after that John was cast into prison Jesus came into Galilee." In both cases it will be observed the words apply to the commencement not to the end of a journey into Galilee. So that the imprisonment could not, as Mr Greswell argues, have taken place during its progress. Now ex hypothesi S. John wishes to distinguish a former journey from the one thus alluded to. How could ccii GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. he possibly do so better than by saying with reference to the cause and commencement of the journey which he proceeds to describe, " Now John was not yet cast into prison " ? If he had said in so many words, "As I know that there will be a danger lest some should confound the journey into Galilee, which I am about to record, with that spoken of by S. Matthew and S. Mark, I here tell you that, whereas the journey they mention was taken after John was cast into prison, this one was taken before that event happened" his meaning would not have been one whit plainer than it is to any one who implicitly accepts the separate statements of each Evangelist. But over and above what we conceive to be this direct and positive testimony on the subject, many other considera- tions seem strongly to confirm the supposition that these two journeys were in fact distinct, and that as a necessary consequence this Unnamed Feast must have been the Feast of Pentecost. For i. The mere fact of the Feast being unnamed implies that the writer supposes that the order of his narrative when compared with the other narratives — which by his use of a similar note of time, viz. a reference to John's imprison- ment, he evidently has in view, — would sufficiently indicate what that feast was. And so in fact, in the case at least of S. Chrysostom and his contemporaries, it did. What reason there may have been in the Evangelist's mind for not naming the feast it is perhaps hardly for us to inquire. But obviously the new associations, which had from the very first gathered round this festival, and to which it was to owe its new Christian name, may very possibly have had something to do both with the omission of the A CRUCIAL QUESTION. cciii name, and the emphasis laid upon the Jewish character of the Festival. 2. Unless we consider the first five, and not the first four chapters, of S. John as forming an introduction to the Galilaean Ministry, we must suppose S. John to have done in the case of his 5 th chapter what he has done in no other part of his Gospel, viz. recorded events the date, and therefore the bearing, of which, considered with reference to the other Gospels, is left a subject of pure conjecture. 3. The presumption in favour of our Lord attending at least the three chief Festivals, until His doing so had become a matter of personal danger, is very strong. Christ came to fulfil the Law. Whereas, if, without any reason assigned, He were represented as not going to the Feast of Pentecost, He would be represented as having begun His ministry by setting an example of ignoring one of the first and most generally observed requirements of the Law. 4. If Christ had not been rejected from Jerusalem before commencing His Galilaean Ministry, and before absenting Himself for a prolonged period from that city, He would not only have given that very cause of offence to the Jewish rulers which He always seemed anxious to avoid, but He would have ignored the principle which He was careful to lay down, that all teaching should have its 'beginning' from Jerusalem. 5. There would be a peculiar significance, and that of a kind which we are led in many ways to expect, in Christ having been first rejected at Jerusalem at the very same Feast at which the first great ingathering of believers took place. Whilst there would be a corresponding improba- bility in the alternative supposition that the Feast of Pentecost, a feast so conspicuous in the after history of the cciv GOSPEL DIFFICULTIES. Church, was the only one of the greater Feasts which Christ never once attended during His Ministry. 6. The whole structure and symmetry of S. John's Gos- pel, especially the marked correspondence between its com- mencement and its close, would be marred by cutting the 5th chapter adrift from those which precede it, and some colour at least would be given to the objections of those who fancy that in S. John's Gospel they have a mere 'fragmentary record.' 7. The record of John v. loses half its force and beauty if regarded in any other light than as an opening Manifesto. The peculiar character and significance of the miracle performed, constituting it an acted parable of the Kingdom, the solemn declaration ' my Father worketh hitherto and I work,' with the expansion of this idea in the closely reasoned argument which follows, all mark this chapter as introductory to the Galilaean ministry recorded by the Synoptic Gospels, and as explanatory of much that becomes comparatively unintelligible, if supposed to have been done or spoken before this Manifesto. Should the considerations thus suggested, combining with and supporting as they do the impression produced by the general character of the incidents recorded, be deemed sufficient to justify the conclusion that this Unnamed Feast can be no other than that which S. Chrysostom and his contemporaries believed it to be, the Feast of Pentecost, it will at once appear how much the general rejection of this opinion in modern times has obscured both the relations existing between the Gospels of S. John and of the other Evangelists, and the view taken of the chronological order of events in our Lord's life. THE FOUR GOSPELS ARRANGED FOR COMPARISON AND CONSECUTIVE READING IN THE ORDER ORIGINALLY PRESCRIBED BY S. LUKE. PRINTED BY PERMISSION IN THE TEXT OF THE REVISED VERSION. H. G. CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTORY. § I. § VIII. From the Annunciation of the Birth of John the Baptist TO The Return of Mary to Nazareth. Time, 9 months. I. THE LEGAL DESCENT OF CHRIST. S. Matt. i. 1— 17. 'The book of the feneration of JESUS CHRIST, the T SON OF DAVID, the SON OF ABRAHAM. ABRAHAM begat Isaac ; 2 and Isaac begat Jacob ; and Jacob begat Judah and his brethren ; and Judah begat Perez and Zera of Tamar ; 3 and Perez begat Hezron ; 1 Or, The genealogy of Jesus Christ 2 Or, birth : as in ver. 18. 4 THE FOUR GOSPELS. and Hezron begat 1 Ram ; 4 and ' Rarn begat Amminadab ; and Amminadab begat Nahshon ; and Nahshon begat Salmon ; 5 and Salmon begat Boaz of Rahab ; and Boaz begat Obed of Ruth ; and Obed begat Jesse; 6 and Jesse begat DAVID THE KING. And David begat Solomon of her that had been the wife of Uriah ; 7 and Solomon begat Rehoboam ; and Rehoboam begat Abijah ; and Abijah begat 2 Asa ; 8 and 2 Asa begat Jehoshaphat ; and Jehoshaphat begat Joram ; and Joram begat Uzziah ; 9 and Uzziah begat Jotham ; and Jotham begat Ahaz ; and Ahaz begat Hezekiah j io and Hezekiah begat Manasseh ; and Manasseh begat 3 Anion ; and 3Amon begat Josiah; ii and Josiah begat Jechoniah and his brethren, at the time of the 4CARRYING AWAY TO BABYLON. 12 And after the 4 carrying away to Babylon, Jechoniah begat 5Shealtiel; and 5Shealtiel begat Zerubbabel; 13 and Zerubbabel begat Abiud ; 1 Gr. Aram. 2 Gr. Asaph. 3 Gr. Amos. 4 Or, removal to Babylon 5 Gr. Salathiel. INTRODUCTORY. 5 and Abiud begat Eliakim ; and Eliakim begat Azor ; and Azor begat Sadoc ; 14 and Sadoc begat Achim ; and Achim begat Eliud ; and Eliud begat Eleazar; i5 and Eleazar begat Matthan ; and Matthan begat Jacob ; and Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of 16 whom was born JESUS, who is called CHRIST. So all the generations from Abraham unto David 17 are fourteen generations ; and from David unto the 1 carrying away to Babylon fourteen generations ; and from the 1 carrying away to Babylon unto the Christ fourteen generations. II. S. LUKE'S PREFACE* S. Luke i. 1 — 4. Forasmuch as many have taken in hand to draw up a 1 narrative concerning those matters which have been 2ful- 1 Or, removal to Babylon 2 Or, fully established * Suggested alternative rendering of S. Luke's Preface. Forasmuch as many have attempted to arrange afresh a narrative of those things which were accomplished in our midst, even as they handed it over to us, which were eyewitnesses and ministers of the word, it seemed good to me also, having followed the course of all things accurately from the first, to write to thee in order, most excellent Theophilus; that thou mightest know the truthfulness of the Gospels wherein thou wast instructed. 6 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 2 filled among us, even as they delivered them unto us, which from the beginning were eyewitnesses and ministers 3 of the word, it seemed good to me also, having traced the course of all things accurately from the first, to write 4 unto thee in order, most excellent Theophilus ; that thou mightest know the certainty concerning the things 2 wherein thou wast instructed. III. ANNUNCIATION OF THE BIRTH OF JOHN THE BAPTIST. Time. 15 months before the Birth of Christ. S. Luke i. 5 — 25. 5 There was in the days of Herod, king of Judaea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the course of Abijah : and he had a wife of the daughters of Aaron, and her name 6 was Elisabeth. And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the 7 Lord blameless. And they had no child, because that Elisabeth was barren, and they both were now 3well stricken in years. 8 Now it came to pass, while he executed the priest's 9 office before God in the order of his course, according to the custom of the priest's office, his lot was to enter into the 4 temple of the Lord and burn incense. 10 And the whole multitude of the people were praying without at the hour of incense. 1 Gr. words. 2 Or, which thou wast taught by word of mouth 3 Gr. advanced in their days. 4 Or, sanctuary INTRODUCTORY. 7 And there appeared unto him an angel of the Lord ri standing on the right side of the altar of incense. And 12 Zacharias was troubled when he saw kim, and fear fell upon him. But the angel said unto him, J3 Fear not, Zacharias : because thy supplication is heard, and thy wife Elisabeth shall bear thee a son, and thou shalt call his name John. And thou shalt have joy and gladness ; 14 and many shall rejoice at his birth. For he shall be great 15 in the sight of the Lord, and he shall drink no wine nor Strong drink ; and he shall be filled with the 2Holy Ghost, even from his mother's womb. And many of the children 16 of Israel shall he turn unto the Lord their God. And 17 he shall 3go before his face in the spirit and power of Elijah, to turn the hearts of the fathers to the children, and the disobedient to walk in the wisdom of the just ; to make ready for the Lord a people prepared for him. And Zacharias said unto the angel, l8 Whereby shall I know this ? for I am an old man, and my wife 4well stricken in years. And the angel answering said unto him, I am Gabriel, 19 that stand in the presence of God ; and I was sent to speak unto thee, and to bring thee these good tidings. And be- 20 hold, thou shalt be silent and not able to speak, until the day that these things shall come to pass, because thou believedst not my words, which shall be fulfilled in their season. 1 Gr. sikera. 2 Or, Holy Spirit: and so throughout this book. 3 Some ancient authorities read come nigh before his face. 4 Gr. advanced in her days. 8 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 21 And the people were waiting for Zacharias, and they marvelled ' while he tarried in the 2 temple. 22 And when he came out, he could not speak unto them: and they perceived that he had seen a vision in the 2 temple: and he continued making signs unto them, and remained dumb. 23 And it came to pass, when the days of his ministration were fulfilled, he departed unto his house. 24 And after these days Elisabeth his wife conceived; and she hid herself five months, saying, 25 Thus hath the Lord done unto me in the days wherein he looked upon me, to take away my reproach among men. IV. ANNUNCIATION OF THE BIRTH OF CHRIST. S. Luke i. 26 — 38. 26 Now in the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from 27 God unto a city of Galilee, named Nazareth, to a virgin betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin's name was Mary. 28 And he came in unto her, and said, Hail, thou that art 3 highly favoured, the Lord is with thee4. 1 Or, at his tarrying 2 Or, sanctuary 3 Or, endued with grace 4 Many ancient authorities add blessed art thou among women. See ver. 42. INTRODUCTORY. 9 But she was greatly troubled at the saying, and cast in 29 her mind what manner of salutation this might be. And the angel said unto her, 30 Fear not, Mary: for thou hast found favour with God. And behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring 31 forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS. He shall be great, and shall be called 32 THE SON OF THE MOST HIGH : and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David : and he shall reign over the house of Jacob 33 2 for ever ; and of his kingdom there shall be no end. And Mary said unto the angel, 34 How shall this be, seeing I know not a man ? And the angel answered and said unto her, 35 The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Most High shall overshadow thee : wherefore also 3that which 4is to be born 5 shall be called HOLY, THE SON OF GOD. And behold, Elisabeth thy kinswoman, she also hath 36 conceived a son in her old age : and this is the sixth month with her that 6was called barren. For no word from God 37 shall be void of power. And Mary said, 38 Behold, the 7 handmaid of the Lord ; be it unto me according to thy word. And the angel departed from her. 1 Or, grace 2 Gr. tinto the ages. 3 Or, the holy thing which is to be born shall be called the Son of God. 4 Or, is begotten 5 Some ancient authorities insert of thee. 6 Or, is 7 Gr. bondmaid. io THE FOUR GOSPELS. V. MARY LEAVES NAZARETH. Time. 9 months before the Birth of Christ. S. Luke i. 39 — 40. 39 And Mary arose in these days and went into the hill 40 country with haste, into a city of Judah ; and entered into the house of Zacharias and saluted Elisabeth. VI. ELISABETH'S HYMN OF PRAISE. S. Luke i. 41 — 45. 41 And it came to pass, when Elisabeth heard the saluta- tion of Mary, the babe leaped in her womb ; 42 and Elisabeth was filled with the Holy Ghost ; and she lifted up her voice with a loud cry, and said, Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb. 43 And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come unto me ? 44 For behold, when the voice of thy salutation came into mine ears, the babe leaped in my womb for joy. 45 And blessed is she that ' believed ; for there shall be a fulfilment of the things which have been spoken to her from the Lord. 1 Or, believed that there shall be INTRODUCTORY. n VII. MARY'S HYMN OF THANKSGIVING. S. Luke i. 46 — 55. And Mary said, 46 My soul doth magnify the Lord, And my spirit hath rejoiced in God my Saviour. 47 For he hath looked upon the low estate of his 1 hand- 48 maiden : For behold, from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed. For he that is mighty hath done to me great things ; 49 And holy is his name. And his mercy is unto generations and generations 50 On them that fear him. He hath shewed strength with his arm ; 51 He hath scattered the proud 2in the imagination of their heart. He hath put down princes from their thrones, 52 And hath exalted them of low degree. The hungry he hath filled with good things ; 53 And the rich he hath sent empty away. He hath holpen Israel his servant, 54 That he might remember mercy (As he spake unto our fathers) 55 Toward Abraham and his seed for ever. VIII. MARY RETURNS TO NAZARETH. Time. 6 months before the Birth of Christ. S. Luke i. 56. And Mary abode with her about three months, and 56 returned unto her house. 1 Gr. bondmaiden. 2 Or, by CHAPTER II. INTRODUCTORY. § IX. § XXI. From the Birth of John the Baptist TO The End of the Residence at Nazareth. Time. 30 years and 6 months. IX. THE BIRTH OF JOHN THE BAPTIST. Time. 6 months before the Birth of Christ. S. Luke i. 57, 58. 57 Now Elisabeth's time was fulfilled that she should be delivered; and she brought forth a son. 58 And her neighbours and her kinsfolk heard that the Lord had magnified his mercy towards her; and they rejoiced with her. INTRODUCTORY. 13 X. THE CIRCUMCISION OF JOHN THE BAPTIST. Time. About 6 months before the Birth of Christ. S. Luke i. 59 — 66. And it came to pass on the eighth day, that they came to 59 circumcise the child ; and they would have called him Zacharias, after the name of his father. And his mother answered and said, 60 Not so ; but he shall be called John. And they said unto her, 61 There is none of thy kindred that is called by this name. And they made signs to his father, what he would have 62 him called. And he asked for a writing tablet, and wrote, 63 saying, HIS NAME IS JOHN. And they marvelled all. And his mouth was opened immediately, and his tongue 64 loosed, and he spake, blessing God. And fear came on all 65 that dwelt round about them : and all these sayings were noised abroad throughout all the hill country of Judaea. And all that heard them laid them up in their heart, 66 saying, What then shall this child be ? For the hand of the Lord was with him. 14 THE FOUR GOSPELS. XL HYMN OF ZACHARIAS. S. Luke i. 67 — 79. 67 And his father Zacharias was filled with the Holy Ghost, and prophesied, saying, 68 Blessed be the Lord, the God of Israel ; For he hath visited and wrought redemption for his people, 69 And hath raised up a horn of salvation for us In the house of his servant David 70 (As he spake by the mouth of his holy prophets which have been since the world began), 71 Salvation from our enemies, and from the hand of all that hate us ; 72 To shew mercy towards our fathers, And to remember his holy covenant ; 73 The oath which he sware unto Abraham our father, 74 To grant unto us that we being delivered out of the hand of our enemies Should serve him without fear, 75 In holiness and righteousness before him all our days. 76 Yea and thou, child, shalt be called the prophet of the Most High : For thou shalt go before the face of the Lord to make ready his ways ; 77 To give knowledge of salvation unto his people In the remission of their sins, INTRODUCTORY. 15 Because of the 1 tender mercy of our God, 78 2Whereby the dayspring from on high 3shall visit us, To shine upon them that sit in darkness and the 79 shadow of death ; To guide our feet into the way of peace. XII. SUMMARY. Time. A period of about 30 years. S. Luke i. 80. And the child grew, and waxed strong in spirit, and was 80 in the deserts till the day of his shewing unto Israel. XIII. THE ANGELIC ANNOUNCEMENT TO JOSEPH. Time. Rather less than 6 months before the Birth of Christ. S. Matt. i. 18—23. Now the * generation 4of Jesus Christ was on this wise : 18 When his mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found with child of the 5 Holy Ghost. And Joseph her husband, being a righteous 19 1 Or, heart of mercy 2 Or, Wherein 3 Many ancient authorities read hath visited us. 4 Some ancient authorities read of the Christ, 5 Or, Holy Spirit : and so throughout this book. * The Revised Version gives the word ' birth ' in the text and the word ' generation ' as the alternative reading. 1 6 THE FOUR GOSPELS. man, and not willing to make her a public example, was 20 minded to put her away privily. But when he thought on these things, behold, an angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife : for that which is 1 conceived in her is of the 21 Holy Ghost. And she shall bring forth a son; and thou shalt call his name JESUS ; for it is he that shall save his 22 people from their sins. Now all this is come to pass, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Lord through the prophet, saying, 23 Behold ! the virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name 2IMMANUEL; which is, being interpreted, GOD WITH US. XIV. SUMMARY CONTAINING THE ONLY RECORD GIVEN BY S. MATTHEW OF THE EVENTS OF ABOUT TWO YEARS AND A HALF. S. Matt. i. 24, 25. 24 And Joseph arose from his sleep, and did as the angel of the Lord commanded him, and took unto him his wife ; 25 and knew her not till she had brought forth a son : and he called his name JESUS. 1 Gr. begotten. 2 Gr. Emmanuel. INTRODUCTORY. 17 XV. THE SETTLEMENT OF JOSEPH AND MARY AT BETHLEHEM. Time. "In those days," i.e. at a time nearly coincident with the Circumcision of John the Baptist or rather less than 6 months before the Birth of Christ. S. Luke ii. 1 — 5. Now it came to pass in those days, there went out a 1 decree from Caesar Augustus, that *all the world should be enrolled. This was the first enrolment made when Quiri- 2 nius was governor of Syria. And all went to enrol themselves, every one to his own 3 city. And Joseph also went up from Galilee, out of the city of 4 Nazareth, into Judaea, to the city of David, which is called Bethlehem, because he was of the house and family of David; to enrol himself with Mary, who was betrothed to 5 him, being great with child. XVI. THE BIRTH OF CHRIST. S. Luke ii. 6 — 20. And it came to pass, while they were there, the days 6 were fulfilled that she should be delivered. 1 Gr. the inhabited earth. H. G. 2 h 18 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 7 And she brought forth her firstborn son; and she wrapped him in swaddling clothes, and laid him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn *. 8 And there were shepherds in the same country abiding in the field, and keeping 1 watch by night over their flock. 9 And an angel of the Lord stood by them, and the glory of the Lord shone round about them : and they were sore io afraid. And the angel said unto them, Be not afraid ; for behold, I bring you good tidings of ii great joy which shall be to all the people : for there is born to you this day in the city of David A Saviour, which is 2 Christ the Lord. 12 And this is the sign unto you; Ye shall find a babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, and lying in a manger. i3 And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying, 14 Glory to God in the highest, And on earth 3 peace among 4men in whom he is well pleased. 15 And it came to pass, when the angels went away from them into heaven, the shepherds said one to another, Let us now go even unto Bethlehem, and see this 5 thing that is come to pass, which the Lord hath made known unto us. 1 Or, night-watches 2 Or, Anointed Lord 8 Many ancient authorities read peace, good pleasure among men. 4 Gr. men of good pleasure. 5 Or, saying * Or guest-chamber, see chapter on the Settlement at Bethlehem. INTRODUCTORY. 19 And they came with haste, and found both Mary and 16 Joseph, and the babe lying in the manger. And when they saw it, they made known concerning the 17 saying which was spoken to them about this child. And all that heard it wondered at the things which were 18 spoken unto them by the shepherds. But Mary kept all these Mayings, pondering them in her 19 heart. And the shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God 20 for all the things that they had heard and seen, even as it was spoken unto them. XVII. THE CIRCUMCISION OF CHRIST. S. Luke ii. 21. And when eight days were fulfilled for circumcising him, 21 his name was called JESUS, which was so called by the angel before he was conceived in the womb. XVIII. THE PURIFICATION AND PRESENTATION OF CHRIST IN THE TEMPLE. Time. Forty days after the Nativity. S. Luke ii. 22 — 38. And when the days of their purification according to 22 the law of Moses were fulfilled, they brought him up to 1 Or, things 20 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 23 Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord (as it is written in the law of the Lord, Every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord), 24 And to offer a sacrifice according to that which is said in the law of the Lord, A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons. 25 And behold, there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon ; and this man was righteous and devout, look- ing for the consolation of Israel : and the Holy Spirit was 26 upon him. And it had been revealed unto him by the Holy Spirit, that he should not see death, before he had seen the Lord's Christ. 27 And he came in the Spirit into the temple : and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, that they might do 28 concerning him after the custom of the law, then he re- ceived him into his arms, and blessed God, and said, 29 Now lettest thou thy l servant depart, O 2 Lord, According to thy word, in peace ; 30 For mine eyes have seen thy salvation, 31 Which thou hast prepared before the face of all peoples ; 32 A light for 3 revelation to the Gentiles, And the glory of thy people Israel. 33 And his father and his mother were marvelling at the things which were spoken concerning him ; 34 and Simeon blessed them, and said unto Mary his mother, Behold, this child is set for the falling and rising up 1 Gr. bond-servant. 2 Gr. Master. 3 Or, the unveiling of the Gentiles INTRODUCTORY. 21 of many in Israel ; and for a sign which is spoken against ; yea and a sword shall pierce through thine own soul ; that 35 thoughts out of many hearts may be revealed. And there was one Anna, a prophetess, the daughter of 36 Phanuel, of the tribe of Asher (she was *of a great age, having lived with a husband seven years from her virginity, and she had been a widow even for fourscore and four 37 years), which departed not from the temple, worshipping with fastings and supplications night and day. And coming up at that very hour she gave thanks unto 38 God, and spake of him to all them that were looking for the redemption of Jerusalem. XIX. THE VISIT OF THE WISE MEN. Time. About 2 years after the Birth of Christ, a date ascertained by Herod by careful inquiry from the Wise Men. S. Matt. ii. 1—23. Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in 1 the days of Herod the king, behold, 2wise men from the east came to Jerusalem, saying, 3 Where is he that is born King of the Jews ? for we saw 2 his star in the east, and are come to worship him. And when Herod the king heard it, he was troubled, 3 and all Jerusalem with him. And gathering together all 4 the chief priests and scribes of the people, he inquired of them where the Christ should be born. 1 Gr. advanced in many days. 2 Gr. Magi. Compare Esther i. 13; Dan. ii. 12. 3 Or, Where is the King of the Jeivs that is bom ? 22 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 5 And they said unto him, In Bethlehem of Judaea : for thus it is written l by the prophet, 6 And thou Bethlehem, land of Judah, Art in no wise least among the princes of Judah : For out of thee shall come forth a governor, Which shall be shepherd of my people Israel. 7 Then Herod privily called the 2wise men, and learned of them carefully 3what time the star appeared. 8 And he sent them to Bethlehem, and said, Go and search out carefully concerning the young child ; and when ye have found him, bring me word, that I also may come and worship him. 9 And they, having heard the king, went their way ; and lo, the star, which they saw in the east, went before them, till it came and stood over where the young child was. io And when they saw the star, they rejoiced with ex- ceeding great joy. n And they came into the house and saw the young child with Mary his mother ; and they fell down and worshipped him ; and opening their treasures they offered unto him gifts, gold and frankincense and myrrh. 12 And being warned of God in a dream that they should not return to Herod, they departed into their own country another way. 13 Now when they were departed, behold, an angel of the Lord appeareth to Joseph in a dream, saying, 1 Or, through 2 Gr. Magi. Compare Esther i. 13; Dan. ii. 12. 3 Or, the time of the star that appeared INTRO D UCTOR Y. 23 Arise and take the young child and his mother, and flee into Egypt, and be thou there until I tell thee : for Herod will seek the young child to destroy him. And he arose and took the young child and his mother 14 by night, and departed into Egypt ; and was there until 15 the death of Herod : that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Lord through the prophet, saying, Out of Egypt did I call my son. Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the 16 Vise men, was exceeding wroth, and sent forth, and slew all the male children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the borders thereof, from two years old and under, accord- ing to the time which he had carefully learned of the Vise men. Then was fulfilled that which was spoken 2by Jere- 17 miah the prophet, saying, A voice was heard in Ramah, r8 Weeping and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children ; And she would not be comforted, because they are not. But when Herod was dead, behold, an angel of the 19 Lord appeareth in a dream to Joseph in Egypt, saying, 20 Arise and take the young child and his mother, and go into the land of Israel : for they are dead that sought the young child's life. And he arose and took the young child and his mother, 21 and came into the land of Israel. But when he heard that 22 Archelaus was reigning over Judaea in the room of his father Herod, he was afraid to go thither; and being warned of 1 Gr. Magi. 2 Or, through 24 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 23 God in a dream, he withdrew into the parts of Galilee, and came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth : that it might be fulfilled which was spoken *by the prophets, that he should be called a Nazarene. XX. SUMMARY BY S. LUKE OF S. MATTHEW'S FULLER NARRATIVE. Time. A period of about 1 years exclusive of the time spent in Egypt. S. Luke ii. 39. 39 And when they had accomplished all things that were ac- cording to the law of the Lord, they returned into Galilee, to their own city Nazareth1. XXI. THE CHILDHOOD, YOUTH AND EARLY MANHOOD OF CHRIST. S. Luke ii. 40 — 52. 40 And the child grew, and waxed strong, 2 filled with wisdom : and the grace of God was upon him. 4i And his parents went every year to Jerusalem at the feast of the passover. 1 Or, through 2 Gr. becoming full of wisdom. 1 Suggested alternative rendering of the original of the above "And when they had brought to an end all the things which were according to the ordering of the Lord [i.e. all the things recorded by S. Matthew] they returned unto Galilee to their own city Nazareth." INTRODUCTORY. 25 And when he was twelve years old, they went up after 42 the custom of the feast; and when they had fulfilled the 43 days, as they were returning, the boy Jesus tarried behind in Jerusalem; and his parents knew it not; but supposing 44 him to be in the company, they went a day's journey; and they sought for him among their kinsfolk and acquaintance : and when they found him not, they returned to Jerusalem, 45 seeking for him. And it came to pass, after three days they found him in 46 the temple, sitting in the midst of the ' doctors, both hearing them, and asking them questions : And all that heard him were amazed at his under- 47 standing and his answers. And when they saw him, they were astonished : and his 48 mother said unto him, 2 Son, why hast thou thus dealt with us? behold, thy father and I sought thee sorrowing. And he said unto them, 49 How is it that ye sought me ? wist ye not that I must be 3in my Father's house ? And they understood not the saying which he spake 50 unto them. And he went down with them, and came to Nazareth; 51 and he was subject unto them: and his mother kept all these 4 sayings in her heart. And Jesus advanced in wisdom and 5 stature, and in 52 6 favour with God and men. 1 Or, teachers 2 Gr. Child. 3 Or, about my Father's business Gr. in the things of my Father. 4 Or, things 5 Or, age 6 Or, grace CHAPTER III. INTRODUCTORY PERIOD. § XXII. § XXXIII. From the Commencement of John's Ministry TO Christ's first brief Residence at Capernaum. Time. Rather less than 8 months. XXII. MINISTRY OF JOHN THE BAPTIST. Time. Probably 6 months before the Baptism of Christ. S. Luke iii. i — 18. i Now in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate being governor of Judaea, and Herod being tetrarch of Galilee, and his brother Philip tetrarch of the region of Ituraea and Trachonitis, and Lysanias tetrarch of i Abilene, in the high-priesthood of Annas and Caiaphas, the word of God came unto John the son of Zacharias in the wilderness. 3 And he came into all the region round about Jordan, preaching the baptism of repentance unto remission of 4 sins ; as it is written in the book of the words of Isaiah the prophet, INTRODUCTORY PERIOD. 27 The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make ye ready the way of the Lord, Make his paths straight. Every valley shall be filled, 5 And every mountain and hill shall be brought low; And the crooked shall become straight, And the rough ways smooth; And all flesh shall see the salvation of God. 6 He said therefore to the multitudes that went out to be 7 baptized of him, Ye offspring of vipers, who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of 8 Repentance, and begin not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father : for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham. And 9 even now is the axe also laid unto the root of the trees : every tree therefore that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. And the multitudes asked him, saying, What then must 10 we do? And he answered and said unto them, n He that hath two coats, let him impart to him that hath none; and he that hath food, let him do likewise. And there came also 2 publicans to be baptized, and 12 they said unto him, 3 Master, what must we do? 1 Or, your repentance 2 See marginal note on Matt. v. 46. 3 Or, Teacher 28 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 13 And he said unto them, Extort no more than that which is appointed you. i4 And Soldiers also asked him, saying, And we, what must we do ? And he said unto them, Do violence to no man, neither 2exact anything wrong- fully; and be content with your wages. 15 And as the people were in expectation, and all men reasoned in their hearts concerning John, whether haply he 16 were the Christ; John answered, saying unto them all, I indeed baptize you with water; but there cometh he that is mightier than I, the latchet of whose shoes I am not 3worthy to unloose: he shall baptize you 4with the Holy 17 Ghost and with fire: whose fan is in his hand, throughly to cleanse his threshing-floor, and to gather the wheat into his garner; but the chaff he will burn up with unquench- able fire. 18 With many other exhortations therefore preached he 5 good tidings unto the people. S. Matt. iii. 1— 12. ! And in those days cometh John the Baptist, preaching 1 in the wilderness of Judaea, saying, Repent ye ; for the kingdom of heaven is at hand. 3 For this is he that was spoken of 6by Isaiah the prophet, saying, 1 Gr. soldiers on service. 2 Or, accuse any one 3 Gr. sufficient. 4 Or, in 5 Ox, the gospel 6 Ox, through INTRODUCTORY PERIOD. 29 The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make ye ready the way of the Lord, Make his paths straight. Now John himself had his raiment of camel's hair, and a 4 leathern girdle about his loins ; and his food was locusts and wild honey. Then went out unto him Jerusalem, and all Judaea, and 5 all the region round about Jordan; and they were baptized 6 of him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins. But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees 7 coming to his baptism, he said unto them, Ye offspring of vipers, who warned you to flee from the wrath to come ? Bring forth therefore fruit worthy of 8 Repentance: and think not to say within yourselves, We 9 have Abraham to our father : for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham. And even now is the axe laid unto the root of the trees: 10 every tree therefore that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. I indeed baptize you 11 2 with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not 3 worthy to bear : he shall baptize you 2with the Holy Ghost and with fire : whose 12 fan is in his hand, and he will throughly cleanse his thresh- ing-floor; and he will gather his wheat into the garner, but the chaff he will burn up with unquenchable fire. 1 Or, your repentance 2 Or, in 3 Or. sufficient. 30 THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Mark i. i— 8. i The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, !the Son of God. 2 Even as it is written 2 in Isaiah the prophet, Behold, I send my messenger before thy face, Who shall prepare thy way ; 3 The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make ye ready the way of the Lord, Make his paths straight; 4 John came, who baptized in the wilderness and preached the baptism of repentance unto remission of sins. 5 And there went out unto him all the country of Judaea, and all they of Jerusalem; and they were baptized of him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins. 6 And John was clothed with camel's hair, and had a leathern girdle about his loins, and did eat locusts and wild 7 honey. And he preached, saying, There cometh after me he that is mightier than I, the latchet of whose shoes I am not 3worthy to stoop down and 8 unloose. I baptized you 4with water; but he shall baptize you 4with the 5Holy Ghost. 1 Some ancient authorities omit the Son of God. 2 Some ancient authorities read in the prophets. 3 Gr. siifficient. 4 Or, in 5 Or, Holy Spirit : and so throughout this book. INTRODUCTORY PERIOD. 31 XXIII. ANTICIPATORY NOTICE OF THE IMPRISON- MENT OF JOHN*. S. Luke iii. 19, 20. But Herod the tetrarch, being reproved by him for 19 Herodias his brother's wife, and for all the evil things which Herod had done, added yet this above all, that he 20 shut up John in prison. XXIV. THE BAPTISM OF CHRIST. Time. About 50 days before the First Passover attended by Christ. S. Matt. iii. 13—17. Then cometh Jesus from Galilee to the Jordan unto 13 John, to be baptized of him. But John would have hindered him, saying, 14 I have need to be baptized of thee, and comest thou to me? * Every ' new departure ' in the work of Christ's Ministry will be found to be prefaced by some allusion to John the Baptist. Hence probably S. Luke's anticipatory notice of John's imprisonment. 32 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 15 But Jesus answering said unto him, Suffer lit now : for thus it becometh us to fulfil all right- eousness. Then he suffereth him. 16 And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway from the water : and lo, the heavens were opened 2unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending as a dove, and 17 coming upon him; and lo, a voice out of the heavens, saying, 3 This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. S. Mark i. 9 — n. 9 And it came to pass in those days, that Jesus came from Nazareth of Galilee, and was baptized of John 4in the 10 Jordan. And straightway coming up out of the water, he saw the heavens rent asunder, and the Spirit as a dove 1 t descending upon him : and a voice came out of the heavens, Thou art my beloved Son, in thee I am well pleased. S. Luke iii. 21, 22. 21 Now it came to pass, when all the people were baptized, that, Jesus also having been baptized, and praying, the 22 heaven was opened, and the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily form, as a dove, upon him, and a voice came out of heaven, Thou art my beloved Son ; in thee I am well pleased. 1 Or, me 2 Some ancient authorities omit unto him, 3 Or, This is my Son ; my beloved in whom I am -well pleased. See ch. xii. 18. * Qr> int0% INTRODUCTORY PERIOD. 33 XXV. JESUS THE SON OF GOD. S. Luke iii. 23 — 38. And Jesus himself, when he began to teach, was about 23 thirty years of age, being the son (as was supposed) of Joseph, the son of Heli, the son of Matthat, the son of Levi, 24 the son of Melchi, the son of Jannai, the son of Joseph, the 25 son of Mattathias, the son of Amos, the son of Nahum, the son of Esli, the son of Naggai, the son of Maath, the son of 26 Mattathias, the son of Semein, the son of Josech, the son of Joda, the son of Joanan, the son of Rhesa, the son of Zerub- 27 babel, the son of ^healtiel, the jwz of Neri, the son of 28 Melchi, the son of Addi, the son of Cosam, the son of Elmadam, the jwz of Er, the son of Jesus, the son of Eliezer, 29 the JW2 of Jorim, the son of Matthat, the son of Levi, the 30 son of Symeon, the jwj of Judas, the son of Joseph, the son of Jonam, the son of Eliakim, the son of Melea, the son of 31 Menna, the son of Mattatha, the son of Nathan, the son of David, the .swz of Jesse, the son of Obed, the son of Boaz, 32 the son of 2 Salmon, the son of Nahshon, the son of Ammina- 33 dab, 3the son of 4Arni, the son of Hezron, the son of Perez, the son of Judah, the son of Jacob, the son of Isaac, the «w 34 of Abraham, the .swj of Terah, the son of Nahor, the son of 35 Serug, the son of Reu, the son of Peleg, the son of Eber, the jc. 3 Or, The Lord is our God ; the Lord is one 4 Gr. from. CLOSING SCENES. 34i The second is this, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as 31 thyself. There is none other commandment greater than these. And the scribe said unto him, Of a truth, 1 Master, thou 32 hast well said that he is one ; and there is none other but he : and to love him with all the heart, and with all the 33 understanding, and with all the strength, and to love his neighbour as himself, is much more than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices. And when Jesus saw that he answered discreetly, he said 34 unto him, Thou art not far from the kingdom of God. And no man after that durst ask him any question. CCXLIV. DAVID'S SON. Time. Same day (Tuesday before Easter). S. Matt. xxii. 41 — 46. Now while the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus 41 asked them a question, saying, 42 What think ye of the Christ ? whose son is he ? They say unto him, The son of David. He saith unto them, How then doth David in the 43 Spirit call him Lord, saying, The Lord said unto my Lord, 44 Sit thou on my right hand, Till I put thine enemies underneath thy feet ? If David then calleth him Lord, how is he his son ? 45 1 Or, Teacher 342 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 46 And no one was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions. S. Mark xii. 35—37. 35 And Jesus answered and said, as he taught in the temple, How say the scribes that Christ is the son of David ? 36 David himself said in the Holy Spirit, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, Till I make thine enemies ' the footstool of thy feet. 37 David himself calleth him Lord ; and whence is he his son? S. Luke xx. 41 — 44. 41 And he said unto them, How say they that the Christ 42 is David's son ? For David himself saith in the book of Psalms, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, 43 Till I make thine enemies the footstool of thy feet. 44 David therefore calleth him Lord, and how is he his son ? 1 Some ancient authorities read iinderneatli thy feet. CLOSING SCENES. 343 WEDNESDAY BEFORE EASTER. CCXLV. THE SINS AND CERTAIN CONDEMNATION OF THE PHARISEES. Time. Wednesday before Easter. S. Matt, xxiii. 1 — 39. Then spake Jesus to the multitudes and to his disciples, 1 saying, 2 The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses' seat : all 3 things therefore whatsoever they bid you, these do and observe : but do not ye after their works ; for they say, and do not. Yea, they bind heavy burdens *and grievous to be 4 borne, and lay them on men's shoulders ; but they them- selves will not move them with their finger. But all their 5 works they do for to be seen of men : for they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments, and love the chief place at feasts, and the chief seats in the 6 synagogues, and the salutations in the marketplaces, and to 7 be called of men, Rabbi. But be not ye called Rabbi : for 8 one is your teacher, and all ye are brethren. And call no man your father on the earth : for one 9 is your Father, 2 which is in heaven. Neither be ye called masters : for one is your master, 10 even the Christ. But he that is 3greatest among you shall be your 11 1 Many ancient authorities omit and grievous to be borne. 2 Gr. the heavenly. 3 Gr. greater. 344 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 12 'servant And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be humbled ; and whosoever shall humble himself shall be exalted. 13 But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites ! because ye shut the kingdom of heaven 2 against men : for ye enter not in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering into enter.3 15 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites ! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte ; and when he is become so, ye make him twofold more a son of 4hell than yourselves. 16 Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the 5 temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the 5 temple, he is 6a debtor. 17 Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, 18 or the 5 temple that hath sanctified the gold? And, Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing ; but who- soever shall swear by the gift that is upon it, he is 6a debtor. 19 Ye blind : for whether is greater, the gift, or the altar that 10 sanctifieth the gift ? He therefore that sweareth by the 21 altar, sweareth by it, and by all things thereon. And he that sweareth by the 5 temple, sweareth by it, and by him 22 that dwelleth therein. And he that sweareth by the heaven, sweareth by the throne of God, and by him that sitteth thereon. 1 Or, minister 2 Gr. before. :># Some authorities insert here, or after ver. 12, ver. 14 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour zaidoivs' hoicses, even while for a pretence ye make long prayers: therefore ye shall receive greater condemnation. See Mark xii. 40 ; Luke xx. 47. 4 Gr. Gehenna. 5 Or, sanctuary: as in ver. 35. 6 Or, bound by his oath CLOSING SCENES. 345 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites I for ye 23 tithe mint and ! anise and cummin, and have left undone the weightier matters of the law, judgement, and mercy, and faith : but these ye ought to have done, and not to have left the other undone. Ye blind guides, which strain out the gnat, and swallow 24 the camel. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites ! for 25 ye cleanse the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full from extortion and excess. Thou 26 blind Pharisee, cleanse first the inside of the cup and of the platter, that the outside thereof may become clean also. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites ! for ye 27 are like unto whited sepulchres, which outwardly appear beautiful, but inwardly are full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness. Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous 28 unto men, but inwardly ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites ! for 29 ye build the sepulchres of the prophets, and garnish the tombs of the righteous, and say, If we had been in the days 30 of our fathers, we should not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye witness to 31 yourselves, that ye are sons of them that slew the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. 3 2 Ye serpents, ye offspring of vipers, how shall ye escape 33 the judgement of 2hell ? Therefore, behold, I send unto 34 you prophets, and wise men, and scribes : some of them shall ye kill and crucify ; and some of them shall ye scourge in your synagogues, and persecute from city to city : that 35 1 Or, dill 2 Gr. Gehenna. 346 THE FOUR GOSPELS. upon you may come all the righteous blood shed on the earth, from the blood of Abel the righteous unto the blood of Zachariah son of Barachiah, whom ye slew between the 36 sanctuary and the altar. Verily I say unto you, All these things shall come upon this generation. 37 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, which killeth the prophets, and stoneth them that are sent unto her ! how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not ! 3 Behold, your house is left unto you ' desolate. For I say unto you, Ye shall not see me henceforth, till ye shall say, Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord. S. Mark xii. 37 — 40. 37 And 2the common people heard him gladly. 38 And in his teaching he said, Beware of the scribes, which desire to walk in long 39 robes, and to have salutations in the marketplaces, and chief seats in the synagogues, and chief places at feasts : 40 they which devour widows' houses, 3and for a pretence make long prayers ; these shall receive greater condemnation. S. Luke xx. 45 — 47. 45 And in the hearing of all the people he said unto his disciples, 46 Beware of the scribes, which desire to walk in long robes, and love salutations in the marketplaces, and chief 47 seats in the synagogues, and chief places at feasts ; which devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayers : these shall receive greater condemnation. 1 Some ancient authorities omit desolate. - Ox, the great multitude 3 Or, even while for a pretence they make CLOSING SCENES. 347 CCXLVI. THE WIDOW'S OFFERING APPROVED. Time. The same day (Wednesday before Easter). S. Mark xii. 41 — 44. And he sat down over against the treasury, and beheld 41 how the multitude cast ' money into the treasury: and many that were rich cast in much. And there came 2a poor widow, and she cast in two 42 mites, which make a farthing. And he called unto him his disciples, and said unto 43 them, Verily I say unto you, This poor widow cast in more than all they which are casting into the treasury : for they 44 all did cast in of their superfluity ; but she of her want did cast in all that she had, even all her living. S. Luke xxi. 1 — 4. And he looked up, 3and saw the rich men that were i casting their gifts into the treasury. And he saw a certain poor widow casting in thither two 2 mites. And he said, Of a truth I say unto you, This poor 3 widow cast in more than they all : for all these did of their 4 superfluity cast in unto the gifts : but she of her want did cast in all the living that she had. 1 Gr. brass. 2 Gr. one. 3 Or, and saw them that... treasury, and they were rich. 348 THE FOUR GOSPELS. CCXLVII. CHRIST FORETELLS THE DESTRUCTION OF THE TEMPLE. Titne. The same day (Wednesday before Easter). S. Matt. xxiv. i, i. And Jesus went out from the temple, and was going on his way ; and his disciples came to him to shew him the buildings of the temple. But he answered and said unto them, See ye not all these things ? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. S. Mark xiii. i, 2. And as he went forth out of the temple, one of his disciples saith unto him, 1 Master, behold, what manner of stones and what manner of buildings ! And Jesus said unto him, Seest thou these great build- ings ? there shall not be left here one stone upon another, which shall not be thrown down. S. Luke xxi. 5, 6. 6 And as some spake of the temple, how it was adorned with goodly stones and offerings, he said, 6 As for these things which ye behold, the days will come, in which there shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down. 1 Or, Teacher CLOSING SCENES. 349 CCXLVIII. THE DISCIPLES QUESTION CHRIST AS TO THE MEANING OF HIS PREDICTION. Time. The same day (Wednesday before Easter). S. Matt. xxiv. 3. And as he sat on the mount of Olives, the disciples came 3 unto him privately, saying, Tell us, when shall these things be ? and what shall be the sign of thy doming, and of 2the end of the world? S. Mark xiii. 3, 4. And as he sat on the mount of Olives over against the 3 temple, Peter and James and John and Andrew asked him privately, Tell us, when shall these things be ? and what shall be 4 the sign when these things are all about to be accom- plished ? S. Luke xxi. 7. And they asked him, saying, - 3 Master, when therefore shall these things be? and what shall be the sign when these things are about to come to pass? 1 Gr. presence. - Or, the consummation of the age 3 Or, Teacher 350 THE FOUR GOSPELS. CCXLIX. FALSE CHRISTS, AND THE BEGINNING OF SORROWS. S. Matt. xxiv. 4—8. 4 And Jesus answered and said unto them, 5 Take heed that no man lead you astray. For many shall come in my name, saying, I am the Christ ; and shall lead many astray. 6 And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars : see that ye be not troubled : for these things must needs come to 7 pass ; but the end is not yet. For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom : and there shall be famines and earthquakes in divers places. 8 But all these things are the beginning of travail. S. Mark xiii. 5 — 8. 5 And Jesus began to say unto them, Take heed that no 6 man lead you astray. Many shall come in my name, saying, I am he ; and shall lead many astray. 7 And when ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars, be not troubled : these things must needs come to pass ; but the end is not yet. 8 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: there shall be earthquakes in divers places; there shall be famines : these things are the beginning of travail. S. Luke xxi. 8 — 11. And he said, Take heed that ye be not led astray : for many shall come in my name, saying, I am he; and, The time is at hand : go ye not after them. CLOSING SCENES. 351 And when ye shall hear of wars and tumults, be not 9 terrified : for these things must needs come to pass first ; but the end is not immediately. Then said he unto them, Nation shall rise against 10 nation, and kingdom against kingdom : and there shall be 1 1 great earthquakes, and in divers places famines and pestilences ; and there shall be terrors and great signs from heaven. CCL. THE PERSONAL SUFFERINGS WHICH THE DIS- CIPLES WILL HAVE TO ENDURE IN PREACH- ING THE GOSPEL BEFORE THE DESTRUC- TION OF JERUSALEM. S. Matt. xxiv. 9 — 14. Then shall they deliver you up unto tribulation, and 9 shall kill you : and ye shall be hated of all the nations for my name's sake. And then shall many stumble, and shall deliver up one 10 another, and shall hate one another. And many false prophets shall arise, and shall lead n many astray. And because iniquity shall be multiplied, the love of the 12 many shall wax cold. But he that endureth to the end, the 13 same shall be saved. And ^his gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in 14 the whole 2world for a testimony unto all the nations ; and then shall the end come. 1 Or, these good tidings - Gr. inhabited earth. 352 THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Mark xiii. 9 — 13. 9 But take ye heed to yourselves: for they shall deliver you up to councils ; and in synagogues shall ye be beaten ; and before governors and kings shall ye stand for my sake, for a testimony unto them. 10 And the gospel must first be preached unto all the nations. 11 And when they lead you to judgement, and deliver you up, be not anxious beforehand what ye shall speak : but whatsoever shall be given you in that hour, that speak ye : for it is not ye that speak, but the Holy Ghost. 12 And brother shall deliver up brother to death, and the father his child ; and children shall rise up against parents, and 1 cause them to be put to death. 13 And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake : but he that endureth to the end, the same shall be saved. S. Luke xxi. 12 — 19. 12 But before all these things, they shall lay their hands on you, and shall persecute you, delivering you up to the synagogues and prisons, 2 bringing you before kings and 13 governors for my name's sake. It shall turn unto you for a testimony. 14 Settle it therefore in your hearts, not to meditate before- 15 hand how to answer : for I will give you a mouth and wisdom, which all your adversaries shall not be able to withstand or to gainsay. 16 But ye shall be delivered up even by parents, and 1 Or, put than to death 2 Gr. you being brought. CLOSING SCENES. 353 brethren, and kinsfolk, and friends \ and some of you 1 shall they cause to be put to death. And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake. 17 And not a hair of your head shall perish. 18 In your patience ye shall win your 2 souls. 19 CCLI. THE IMMEDIATE SIGNS WHICH SHOULD PRE- CEDE THE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM. S. Matt. xxiv. 15—28. When therefore ye see the abomination of desolation, 15 which was spoken of 3by Daniel the prophet, standing in 4 the holy place (let him that readeth understand), then let 16 them that are in Judaea flee unto the mountains : let him 17 that is on the housetop not go down to take out the things that are in his house : and let him that is in the field not 18 return back to take his cloke. But woe unto them that are with child and to them that 19 give suck in those days ! And pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, 20 neither on a sabbath : for then shall be great tribulation, 2 1 such as hath not been from the beginning of the world until now, no, nor ever shall be. And except those days had been shortened, no flesh 22 would have been saved : but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened. Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is the Christ, 23 1 Or, shall they put to death 2 Or, lives 3 Or, through 4 Or, a holy place H. G. 23 354 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 24 or, Here ; believe xit not. For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; so as to lead astray, if possible, even the elect. *£ Behold, I have told you beforehand. If therefore they shall say unto you, Behold, he is in the wilderness ; go not forth : Behold, he is in the inner chambers ; believe 2it not. 27 For as the lightning cometh forth from the east, and is seen even unto the west ; so shall be the 3 coming of the Son of man. 28 Wheresoever the carcase is, there will the 4 eagles be gathered together. S. Mark xiii. 14 — 23. 14 But when ye see the abomination of desolation standing where he ought not (let him that readeth understand), then 15 let them that are in Judaea flee unto the mountains: and let him that is on the housetop not go down, nor enter in, 16 to take anything out of his house : and let him that is in the field not return back to take his cloke. j 7 But woe unto them that are with child and to them that give suck in those days ! And pray ye that it be not in the winter. For those days shall be tribulation, such as there hath not been the like from the beginning of the creation which God created 20 until now, and never shall be. And except the Lord had shortened the days, no flesh would have been saved : but for the elect's sake, whom he chose, he shortened the days. 21 And then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is the 22 Christ; or, Lo, there; believe lit not: for there shall arise 1 Or, him 2 Or, them 3 dr. presence. 4 Or, vultures CLOSING SCENES. 355 false Christs and false prophets, and shall shew signs and wonders, that they may lead astray, if possible, the elect. But take ye heed : behold, I have told you all things 23 beforehand. S. Luke xxi. 20 — 24. But when ye see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then 20 know that her desolation is at hand. Then let them that are in Judaea flee unto the mountains; 21 and let them that are in the midst of her depart out ; and let not them that are in the country enter therein. For 22 these are days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled. Woe unto them that are with child and to them that 23 give suck in those days ! for there shall be great distress upon the Mand, and wrath unto this people. And they shall 24 fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led captive into all the nations : and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled. CCLII. CHRIST'S "COMING" SHALL IMMEDIATELY FOLLOW UPON THE DESTRUCTION OF JERUSALEM. S. Matt. xxiv. 29 — 31. But immediately, after the tribulation of those days, the 29 sun shall be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken : 1 Or, earth 23—2 356 THE FOUR GOSPELS. Bo and then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven : and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. 31 And he shall send forth his angels ^th 2a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other. S. Mark xiii. 24 — 27. 24 But in those days, after that tribulation, the sun shall be 25 darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall be falling from heaven, and the powers that are in the heavens shall be shaken. 26 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in clouds with great power and glory. 27 And then shall he send forth the angels, and shall gather together his elect from the four winds, from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of heaven. S. Luke xxi. 25 — 28. 25 And there shall be signs in sun and moon and stars ; and upon the earth distress of nations, in perplexity for the 26 roaring of the sea and the billows ; men 3 fainting for fear, and for expectation of the things which are coming on 4the world : for the powers of the heavens shall be shaken. 27 And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory. 1 Many ancient authorities read with a great trumpet, and they shall gather &*e. ~ Or, a trumpet of great sound 3 Or, expiring 4 Gr. the inhabited earth. CLOSING SCENES. 357 But when these things begin to come to pass, look up, 28 and lift up your heads ; because your redemption draweth nigh. CCLIII. THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE KINGDOM OF GOD TO BE WITHIN THE LIFETIME OF THE EXISTING GENERATION. S. Matt. xxiv. 32 — 41. Now from the fig tree learn her parable : 32 when her branch is now become tender, and putteth forth its leaves, ye know that the summer-is nigh ; even so 33 ye also, when ye see all these things, know ye that 'he is nigh, even at the doors. Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass 34 away, till all these things be accomplished. Heaven and 35 earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away. But of that day and hour knoweth no one, not even the $6 angels of heaven, 2 neither the Son, but the Father only. And as were the days of Noah, so shall be the 3 coming 37 of the Son of man. For as in those days which were before 38 the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark, and they knew not until the flood came, and took them 39 all away ; so shall be the 3 coming of the Son of man. Then shall two men be in the field ; one is taken, and 40 one is left : two women shall be grinding at the mill ; one is 41 taken, and one is left. 1 Or, it 2 Many authorities, some ancient, omit neither the Son. 3 Gr. presence. 358 THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Mark xiii. 28 — 32. 28 Now from the fig tree learn her parable : when her branch is now become tender, and putteth 29 forth its leaves, ye know that the summer is nigh ; even so ye also, when ye see these things coming to pass, know ye that :he is nigh, even at the doors. 30 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass 31 away, until all these things be accomplished. Heaven and earth shall pass away : but my words shall not pass away. 32 But of that day or that hour knoweth no one, not even the angels in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father. S. Luke xxi. 29 — 33. 29 And he spake to them a parable : 30 Behold the fig tree, and all the trees : when they now shoot forth, ye see it and know of your own selves that the summer is now nigh. 31 Even so ye also, when ye see these things coming to 32 pass, know ye that the kingdom of God is nigh. Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, till all 33 things be accomplished. Heaven and earth shall pass away : but my words shall not pass away. 1 Or, it CLOSING SCENES. 359 CCLIV. THE UNCERTAINTY OF THE EXACT TIME OF CHRIST'S COMING WOULD NECESSITATE GREAT WATCHFULNESS ON THE PART OF THE DISCIPLES. S. Matt. xxiv. 42 — 51. Watch therefore : for ye know not on what day your 42 Lord cometh. 1 But know this, that if the master of the house had 43 known in what watch the thief was coming, he would have watched, and would not have suffered his house to be 2 broken through. Therefore be ye also ready : for in an hour 44 that ye think not the Son of man cometh. Who then is the faithful and wise 3 servant, whom his lord 45 hath set over his household, to give them their food in due season? Blessed is that 3 servant, whom his lord when he 46 cometh shall find so doing. Verily I say unto you, that he 47 will set him over all that he hath. But if that evil 3servant shall say in his heart, My lord 48 tarrieth ; and shall begin to beat his fellow-servants, and shall 49 eat and drink with the drunken; the lord of that 3 servant 5° shall come in a day when he expecteth not, and in an hour when he knoweth not, and shall 4cut him asunder, and 51 appoint his portion with the hypocrites : there shall be the weeping and gnashing of teeth. 1 Ox, B tit this ye know 2 Gr. digged through. 3 Gr. bondservant. 4 Or, severely scourge him 360 THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Mark xiii. 33 — 37. 33 Take ye heed, watch ! and pray : for ye know not when the time is. 34 // is as when a man, sojourning in another country, having left his house, and given authority to his Servants, to each one his work, commanded also the porter to watch. 35 Watch therefore : for ye know not when the lord of the house cometh, whether at even, or at midnight, or at 36 cockcrowing, or in the morning ; lest coming suddenly he find you sleeping. 37 And what I say unto you I say unto all, Watch. S. Luke xxi. 34 — 36. 34 But take heed to yourselves, lest haply your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting, and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and that day come on you suddenly as a snare : 35 for so shall it come upon all them that dwell on the face of all the earth. 36 But watch ye at every season, making supplication, that ye may prevail to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man. CCLV. THE ABOVE TEACHING ENFORCED BY PARABLES. S. Matt. xxv. 1 — 30. 1 Then shall the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their 3 lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom. 1 Some ancient authorities omit and pray. - Gr. bondservants. 3 Or, forc/:es CLOSING SCENES. 361 And five of them were foolish, and five were wise. 2 For the foolish, when they took their ! lamps, took no oil 3 with them : but the wise took oil in their vessels with their 4 1 lamps. Now while the bridegroom tarried, they all slumbered 5 and slept. But at midnight there is a cry, Behold, the bridegroom ! 6 Come ye forth to meet him. Then all those virgins arose, and trimmed their x lamps. 7 And the foolish said unto the wise, Give us of your oil ; 8 for our ] lamps are going out. But the wise answered, saying, Perad venture there will 9 not be enough for us and you : go ye rather to them that sell, and buy for yourselves. And while they went away to buy, the bridegroom came; 10 and they that were ready went in with him to the marriage feast : and the door was shut. Aftenvard come also the other virgins, saying, Lord, Lord, 11 open to us. But he answered and said, Verily I say unto you, I know 12 you not. Watch therefore, for ye know not the day nor the hour. 13 For it is as when a man, going into another country, 14 called his own 2 servants, and delivered unto them his goods. And unto one he gave five talents, to another two, to 15 another one ; to each according to his several ability ; and he went on his journey. Straightway he that received the five talents went and 16 traded with them, and made other five talents. 1 Or, torches " Gr. bondservants. 362 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 17 In like manner he also that received the two gained other two. 18 But he that received the one went away and digged in the earth, and hid his lord's money. 19 Now after along time the lord of those Servants cometh, and maketh a reckoning with them. 20 And he that received the five talents came and brought other five talents, saying, Lord, thou deliveredst unto me five talents : lo, I have gained other five talents. 21 His lord said unto him, Well done, good and faithful 2 servant : thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will set thee over many things : enter thou into the joy of thy lord. 22 And he also that received the two talents came and said, Lord, thou deliveredst unto me two talents : lo, I have gained other two talents. 23 His lord said unto him, Well done, good and faithful 2 servant ; thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will set thee over many things : enter thou into the joy of thy lord. 24 And he also that had received the one talent came and said, Lord, I knew thee that thou art a hard man, reaping where thou didst not sow, and gathering where thou didst 25 not scatter : and I was afraid, and went away and hid thy talent in the earth : lo, thou hast thine own. 26 But his lord answered and said unto him, Thou wicked and slothful 2 servant, thou knewest that I reap where I 27 sowed not, and gather where I did not scatter ; thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the bankers, and at my coming I should have received back mine own with interest. 1 Gr. bondservants. , 2 Gr. bondservant. CLOSING SCENES. 363 Take ye away therefore the talent from him, and give it 28 unto him that hath the ten talents. For unto every one 29 that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance : but from him that hath not, even that which he hath shall be taken away. And cast ye out the unprofitable Servant into the outer 30 darkness : there shall be the weeping and gnashing of teeth. CCLVI. THE JUDGEMENT WHICH SHOULD BE COIN- CIDENT WITH CHRIST'S COMING. S. Matt. xxv. 31 — 46. But when the Son of man shall come in his glory, and 31 all the angels with him, then shall he sit on the throne of his glory : and before him shall be gathered all the nations : 32 and he shall separate them one from another, as the shepherd separateth the sheep from the 2goats : and he 33 shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the 2goats on the left. Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, 34 Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world : for I 35 was an hungred, and ye gave me meat : I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink : I was a stranger, and ye took me in ; naked, and ye clothed me : I was sick, and ye visited me : 36 I was in prison, and ye came unto me. Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when 37 saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee ? or athirst, and gave 1 Gr. bondservant. 2 Gr. kids. 364 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 38 thee drink ? And when saw we thee a stranger, and took 39 thee in ? or naked, and clothed thee ? And when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee ? 40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it unto one of these my brethren, even these least, ye did it unto me. 4i Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, 1 Depart from me, ye cursed, into the eternal fire which is 42 prepared for the devil and his angels : for I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat : I was thirsty, and ye gave me no 43 drink : I was a stranger, and ye took me not in ; naked, and ye clothed me not ; sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not. 44 Then shall they also answer, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee ? 45 Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not unto one of these least, ye did it not unto me. 46 And these shall go away into eternal punishment : but the righteous into eternal life. CCLVII. EXPLANATORY SUMMARIES. S. Luke xxi. 37, 38. 37 And every day he was teaching in the temple ; and every night he went out, and lodged in the mount that is called the mount of Olives. 1 Or, Depart from me under a curse CLOSING SCENES. 365 And all the people came early in the morning to him in 38 the temple, to hear him. S. Mark xi. 19 (repeated). And l every evening 2he went forth out of the city. 19 CCLVIII. THE COVENANT OF BETRAYAL. Time. The same day (Wednesday before Easter). S. Matt. xxvi. r — 5, 14 — 16. And it came to pass, when Jesus had finished all these 1 words, he said unto his disciples, Ye know that after two days the passover cometh, and 2 the Son of man is delivered up to be crucified. Then were gathered together the chief priests, and the 3 elders of the people, unto the court of the high priest, who was called Caiaphas; and they took counsel together that 4 they might take Jesus by subtilty, and kill him. But they said, Not during the feast, lest a tumult arise 5 among the people. * * # # * * Then one of the twelve, who was called Judas Iscariot, 14 went unto the chief priests, and said, 15 What are ye willing to give me, and I will deliver him unto you? And they weighed unto him thirty pieces of silver. And from that time he sought opportunity to deliver 16 him unto them. 1 Gr. whenever evening came. 2 Some ancient authorities read they. 366 THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Mark xiv. i, 2, 10, 11. x Now after two days was the feast of the passover and the unleavened bread : and the chief priests and the scribes sought how they might take him with subtilty, and kill him : 2 for they said, Not during the feast, lest haply there shall be a tumult of the people. ****** 10 And Judas Iscariot, Jhe that was one of the twelve, went away unto the chief priests, that he might deliver him unto 11 them. And they, when they heard it, were glad, and promised to give him money. And he sought how he might conveniently deliver him imio them. S. Luke xxii. 1 — 6. 1 Now the feast of unleavened bread drew nigh, which is called the Passover. 2 And the chief priests and the scribes sought how they might put him to death ; for they feared the people. 3 And Satan entered into Judas who was called Iscariot, being of the number of the twelve. 4 And he went away, and communed with the chief priests and captains, how he might deliver him unto them. 5 And they were glad, and covenanted to give him money. 6 And he consented, and sought opportunity to deliver him unto them 2in the absence of the multitude. 1 Gr. the one of the twelve. 2 Or, without tumult CLOSING SCENES. 367 THURSDAY BEFORE EASTER. CCLIX. THE COMING OF CERTAIN GREEKS LEADS CHRIST TO EXPLAIN HIS TRUE GLORY. Time. The morning of Thursday before Easter. S. John xii. 20 — 26. Now there were certain Greeks among those that went up 20 to worship at the feast : these therefore came to Philip, 21 which was of Bethsaida of Galilee, and asked him, saying, Sir, we would see Jesus. Philip cometh and telleth Andrew : Andrew cometh, and 22 Philip, and they tell Jesus. And Jesus answereth them, saying, The hour is come, 23 that the Son of man should be glorified. Verily, verily, I 24 say unto you, Except a grain of wheat fall into the earth and die, it abideth by itself alone ; but if it die, it beareth much fruit. He that loveth his l life loseth it ; and he that hateth his 25 Hife in this world shall keep it unto life eternal. If any man serve me, let him follow me ; and where I 26 am, there shall also my servant be : if any man serve me, him will the Father honour. 1 Or, soul 368 THE FOUR GOSPELS. CCLX. A VOICE FROM HEAVEN TESTIFIES TO THE IDENTITY OF THE GLORY OF CHRIST WITH THAT OF THE FATHER. S. John xii. 27 — 36. 27 Now is my soul troubled ; and what shall I say? Father, save me from this Jhour. But for this cause came I unto this hour. 28 Father, glorify thy name. There came therefore a voice out of heaven, saying, I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again. 29 The multitude therefore, that stood by, and heard it, said that it had thundered : others said, An angel hath spoken to him. 30 Jesus answered and said, This voice hath not come for 31 my sake, but for your sakes. Now is 2the judgement of this 32 world : now shall the prince of this world be cast out. And I, if I be lifted up 3from the earth, will draw all men unto myself. 33 But this he said, signifying by what manner of death he should die. 34 The multitude therefore answered him, We have heard out of the law that the Christ abideth for ever : and how sayest thou, The Son of man must be lifted up ? who is this Son of man ? 35 Jesus therefore said unto them, Yet a little while is the light 4 among you. Walk while ye have the light, that 1 Or, hour? 2 Or, a judgement 3 Or, out of 4 Or, in CLOSING SCENES. 369 darkness overtake you not : and he that walketh in the darkness knoweth not whither he goeth. While ye have the 36 light, believe on the light, that ye may become sons of light. These things spake Jesus, and he departed and Miid himself from them. CCLXI. BELIEF IN CHRIST INVOLVED BELIEF IN THE FATHER. Time. The same day. S. John xii. 37—50. But though he had done so many signs before them, yet 37 they believed not on him : that the word of Isaiah the 38 prophet might be fulfilled, which he spake, Lord, who hath believed our report ? And to whom hath the arm of the Lord been revealed ? For this cause they could not believe, for that Isaiah 39 said again, He hath blinded their eyes, and he hardened their 40 heart; Lest they should see with their eyes, and perceive with their heart, And should turn, And I should heal them. These things said Isaiah, because he saw his glory; and 41 he spake of him. Nevertheless even of the rulers many believed on him ; 42 but because of the Pharisees they did not confess *if} lest 1 Or, was hidden from them 2 Or, him H. G. 24 370 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 43 they should be put out of the synagogue : for they loved the glory of men more than the glory of God. 44 And Jesus cried and said, He that believeth on me, 45 believeth not on me, but on him that sent me. And he that beholdeth me beholdeth him that sent me. 46 1 am come a light into the world, that whosoever believeth on me may not abide in the darkness. 47 And if any man hear my sayings, and keep them not, I judge him not : for I came not to judge the world, but to 48 save the world. He that rejecteth me, and receiveth not my sayings, hath one that judgeth him : the word that I spake, 49 the same shall judge him in the last day. For I spake not from myself; but the Father which sent me, he hath given me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should 50 speak. And I know that his commandment is life eternal : the things therefore which I speak, even as the Father hath said unto me, so I speak. CHAPTER XX. CLOSING SCENES. § CCLXII. § CCLXXXI. The Institution of the Lord's Supper, with events immediately preceding and following. Time. Thursday before Easter ; midday, evening, and earlier part of the night. CCLXII. CHRIST DIRECTS PETER AND JOHN TO PRE- PARE THE PASSOVER*, AND INDICATES THE PLACE WHERE PREPARATIONS ARE TO BE MADE. Time. On the first day of unleavened bread (Thursday before Easter). S. Luke xxii. 7 — 13. And the day of unleavened bread came, on which the 7 passover must be sacrificed. And he sent Peter and John, saying, Go and make 8 ready for us the passover, that we may eat. And they said unto him, Where wilt thou that we make 9 ready ? * See note p. 405. 24 — 2 372 THE FOUR GOSPELS. jo And he said unto them, Behold, when ye are entered into the city, there shall meet you a man bearing a pitcher of water ; follow him into the house whereinto he goeth. ii And ye shall say unto the goodman of the house, The ' Master saith unto thee, Where is the guest- chamber, where I shall eat the passover with my disciples ? 12 And he will shew you a large upper room furnished : there make ready. 13 And they went, and found as he had said unto them : and they made ready the passover. S. Matt. xxvi. 17 — 19. 17 Now on the first day of unleavened bread the disciples came to Jesus, saying, Where wilt thou that we make ready for thee to eat the passover ? 18 And he said, Go into the city to such a man, and say unto him, The 1 Master saith, My time is at hand ; I keep the passover at thy house with my disciples. 19 And the disciples did as Jesus appointed them ; and they made ready the passover. S. Mark xiv. 12 — 16. i2 And on the first day of unleavened bread, when they sacrificed the passover, his disciples say unto him, Where wilt thou that we go and make ready that thou may est eat the passover ? 13 And he sendeth two of his disciples, and saith unto them, 1 Or, Teacher CLOSING SCENES. 373 Go into the city, and there shall meet you a man bearing a pitcher of water : follow him ; and wheresoever 14 he shall enter in, say to the goodman of the house, The 1 Master saith, Where is my guest-chamber, where I shall eat the passover with my disciples ? And he will himself shew you a large upper room fur- 15 nished and ready : and there make ready for us. And the disciples went forth, and came into the city, 16 and found as he had said unto them : and they made ready the passover. CCLXIII. CHRIST ADDRESSES THE DISCIPLES AND GIVES THEM THE FIRST PASCHAL CUP. Time "When even was come." S. Luke xxii. 14 — 18. And when the hour was come, he sat down, and the 14 apostles with him. And he said unto them, With desire I have desired to 15 eat this passover with you before I suffer : for I say unto 16 you, I will not eat it, until it be fulfilled in the kingdom of God. And he received a cup, and when he had given 17 thanks, he said, Take this, and divide it among yourselves : for I say 18 unto you, I will not drink from henceforth of the fruit of the vine, until the kingdom of God shall come. 1 Or, Teacher 374 THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Matt. xxvi. 20, 29. 20 Now when even was come, he was sitting at meat with the twelve 1 disciples. * * # #• * *■ 29 But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father's kingdom. S. Mark xiv. 17, 25. 17 And when it was evening he cometh with the twelve. * * # * * # 25 Verily I say unto you, I will no more drink of the fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new in the kingdom of God. CCLXIV. CHRIST FIRST SPEAKS OF HIS BETRAYAL AND IDENTIFIES THE TRAITOR. S. Matt. xxvi. 21 — 25. 21 And as they were eating, he said, Verily I say unto you, that one of you shall betray me. 22 And they were exceeding sorrowful, and began to say unto him every one, Is it I, Lord ? 23 And he "answered and said, He that dipped his hand 24 with me in the dish, the same shall betray me. The Son of 1 Many authorities, some ancient, omit disciples. . CLOSING SCENES. 375. man goeth, even as it is written of him : but woe unto that man through whom the Son of man is betrayed ! good were it ' for that man if he had not been born. And Judas, which betrayed him, answered and said, 25 Is it I, Rabbi ? He saith unto him, Thou hast said. S. Mark xiv. 18 — 21. And as they 2sat and were eating, 18 Jesus said, Verily I say unto you, One of you shall betray me, even he that eateth with me. They began to be sorrowful, and to say unto him one by 19 one, Is it I ? And he said unto them, It is one of the twelve, he that 20 dippeth with me in the dish. For the Son of man goeth, 21 even as it is written of him : but woe unto that man through whom the Son of man is betrayed ! good were it l for that man if he had not been born. CCLXV. CHRIST GIVES TO THE BREAD ITS NEW OR SACRAMENTAL CHARACTER. S. Matt. xxvi. 26. And as they were eating, Jesus took 3bread, and blessed, 16 and brake it ; and he gave to the disciples, and said, Take, eat ; this is my body. 1 Gr. for him if that man. 2 Gr. reclined. 3 Or, a loaf 376 THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Mark xiv. 22. 22 And as they were eating, he took ' bread, and when he had blessed, he brake it, and gave to them, and said, Take ye : this is my body. S. Luke xxii. 19. 19 And he took * bread, and when he had given thanks, he brake it, and gave to them, saying, This is my body 2 which is given for you : this do in remembrance of me. CCLXVI. DURING SUPPER CHRIST WASHES THE DIS- CIPLES' FEET AND TWICE ALLUDES TO HIS BETRAYAL. S. John xiii. 1 — 20. r Now before the feast of the passover, Jesus knowing that his hour was come that he should depart out of this world unto the Father, having loved his own which were in the world, he loved them 3unto the end. 2 And during supper, the devil having already put into the heart of Judas Iscariot, Simon's son, to betray him, 3 Jesus, knowing that the Father had given all things into his hands, and that he came forth from God, and goeth unto 4 God, riseth from supper, and layeth aside his garments ; and he took a towel, and girded himself. 1 Or, a loaf 2 Some ancient authorities omit which is given for you... which is poured out for you. 3 Or, to the uttermost CLOSING SCENES. 377 Then he poureth water into the bason, and began 5 to wash the disciples' feet, and to wipe them with the towel wherewith he was girded. So he cometh to Simon Peter. 6 He saith unto him, Lord, dost thou wash my feet ? Jesus answered and said unto him, What I do thou 7 knowest not now ; but thou shalt understand hereafter. Peter saith unto him, Thou shalt never wash my feet. 8 Jesus answered him, If I wash thee not, thou hast no part with me. Simon Peter saith unto him, Lord, not my feet only, 9 but also my hands and my head. Jesus saith to him, He that is bathed needeth not *save 10 to wash his feet, but is clean every whit : and ye are clean, but not all. For he knew him that should betray him j therefore said 11 he, Ye are not all clean. So when he had washed their feet, and taken his 12 garments, and 2sat down again, he said unto them, Know ye what I have done to you ? Ye call me, 13 3 Master, and, Lord: and ye say well; for so I am. If I i4 then, the Lord and the 3 Master, have washed your feet, ye also ought to wash one another's feet. For I have given 15 you an example, that ye also should do as I have done to you. Verily, verily, I say unto you, A 4 servant is not 16 greater than his lord ; neither 5 one that is sent greater than he that sent him. If ye know these things, blessed are ye if ye do them. 17 1 Some ancient authorities omit save, and his feet. 2 Gr. reclined. 3 Or, Teacher 4 Gr. bondservant. 5 Gr. an apostle. / 378 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 1 8 I speak not of you all : I know whom I 'have chosen : but that the scripture may be fulfilled, He that eateth 2my bread lifted up his heel against me. 19 From henceforth I tell you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye may believe that 3I am he. 20 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that receiveth whomsoever I send receiveth me ; and he that receiveth me receiveth him that sent me. CCLXVII. AFTER SUPPER CHRIST GIVES TO THE WINE ITS NEW OR SACRAMENTAL CHARACTER. S. Luke xxii. 20. And the cup in like manner after supper, saying, This cup is the new 4 covenant in my blood, even that which is poured out for you. S. Matt. xxvi. 27, 28. 27 And he took 5a cup, and gave thanks, and gave to them, saying, 28 Drink ye all of it ; for this is my blood of 6the 7 covenant, which is shed for many unto remission of sins. 1 Or, chose 2 Many ancient authorities read his bread with me. 3 Or, I am 4 Or, testament 5 Some ancient authorities read the cup. 6 Or, the testament 7 Many ancient authorities insert new. CLOSING SCENES. 379 S. Mark xiv. 23, 24. And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks, he 23 gave to them : and they all drank of it. And he said unto 24 them, This is my blood of xthe 2 covenant, which is shed for many. CCLXVIII. FOR THE THIRD TIME CHRIST SPEAKS OF HIS BETRAYAL BUT THE IMPRESSION CREATED UPON THE DISCIPLES DOES NOT PREVENT THEIR CONTENDING WITH EACH OTHER WHICH SHOULD BE THE GREATEST. S. Luke xxii. 21 — 24. But behold, the hand of him that betrayeth me is with 21 me on the table. For the Son of man indeed goeth, as it 22 hath been determined : but woe unto that man through whom he is betrayed ! And they began to question among themselves, which 23 of them it was that should do this thing. And there arose also a contention among them, which 24 of them is accounted to be 3greatest. 1 Or, the testament 2 Many ancient authorities insert new. 3 Gr. greater. 38o THE FOUR GOSPELS. CCLXIX. CHRIST SEEKS TO ALLAY THE SPIRIT OF RIVALRY AMONGST THE DISCIPLES AND GIVES TO S. PETER THE FIRST WARNING OF HIS DENIAL. S. Luke xxii. 25 — 38. 25 And he said unto them, The kings of the Gentiles have lordship over them ; and they that have authority over them are called Benefactors. 26 But ye shall not be so : but he that is the greater among you. let him become as the younger ; and he that is chief, 27 as he that doth serve. For whether is greater, he that 'sitteth at meat, or he that serveth? is not he that 'sitteth at meat? but I am in the midst of you as he that serveth. 28 But ye are they which have continued with me in my 29 temptations ; and 2I appoint unto you a kingdom, even as 30 my Father appointed unto me, that ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom ; and ye shall sit on thrones judg- ing the twelve tribes of Israel. 31 Simon, Simon, behold, Satan 3asked to have you, that 32 he might sift you as wheat : but I made supplication for thee, that thy faith fail not : and do thou, when once thou hast turned again, stablish thy brethren. 33 And he said unto him, Lord, with thee I am ready to go both to prison and to death. 1 Gr. reclineth. 2 Or, / appoint unto you, even as my Father appointed unto mc a kingdom, that ye may eat and drink Sfe. 3 Or, obtained you by asking CLOSING SCENES. 381 And he said, I tell thee, Peter, the cock shall not crow 34 this day, until thou shalt thrice deny that thou knowest me. And he said unto them, When I sent you forth without 35 purse, and wallet, and shoes, lacked ye any thing ? And they said, Nothing. And he said unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, 36 let him take it, and likewise a wallet : 1 and he that hath none, let him sell his cloke, and buy a sword. For I say 37 unto you, that this which is written must be fulfilled in me. And he was reckoned with transgressors : for that which concerneth me hath 2 fulfilment. And they said, Lord, behold, here are two swords. 38 And he said unto them, It is enough. CCLXX. SPEAKING FOR THE FOURTH TIME OF HIS BETRAYAL, CHRIST MORE DISTINCTLY IDENTIFIES JUDAS AS THE TRAITOR. Time. The setting in of night, but early enough for purchases to be made or alms distributed. S. John xiii. 21 — 30. When Jesus had thus said, he was troubled in the spirit, 21 and testified, and said, Verily, verily, I say unto you, that one oT you shall betray me. The disciples looked one on another, doubting of whom 22 he spake. ] Or, and he that hath no sword, let him sell his cloke, and buy one. - Gr. end. 382 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 23 There was at the table reclining in Jesus' bosom one of his disciples, whom Jesus loved. 24 Simon Peter therefore beckoneth to him, and saith unto him, Tell us who it is of whom he speaketh. 2^ He leaning back, as he was, on Jesus' breast saith unto him, Lord, who is it? 26 Jesus therefore answereth, He it is, for whom I shall dip the sop, and give it him. So when he had dipped the sop, he taketh and giveth it to Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot. 27 And after the sop, then entered Satan into him. Jesus therefore saith unto him, That thou doest, do quickly. 28 Now no man at the table knew for what intent he spake 29 this unto him. For some thought, because Judas had the Jbag, that Jesus said unto him, Buy what things we have need of for the feast ; or, that he should give something to the poor. 30 He then having received the sop went out straightway : and it was night. 1 Or, box CLOSING SCENES. 383 CCLXXI. CHRIST SPEAKS OF THE IDENTITY OF HIS OWN GLORY WITH THAT OF THE FATHER, URGES THE DISCIPLES TO MUTUAL LOVE, AND A SECOND TIME WARNS S. PETER THAT HE WILL DENY HIM. S. John xiii. 31 — 38. When therefore he was gone out, Jesus saith, 3 c Now *is the Son of man glorified, and God Jis glorified in him ; and God shall glorify him in himself, and straight- 32 way shall he glorify him. Little children, yet a little while I am with you. Ye 33 shall seek me : and as I said unto the Jews, Whither I go, ye cannot come ; so now I say unto you. A new commandment I give unto you, that ye love one 34 another; 2even as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. By this shall all men know that ye are my 35 disciples, if ye have love one to another. Simon Peter saith unto him, Lord, whither goest thou ? 36 Jesus answered, Whither I go, thou canst not follow me now ; but thou shalt follow afterwards. Peter saith unto him, Lord, why cannot I follow thee 37 even now ? I will lay down my life for thee. Jesus answereth, Wilt thou lay down thy life for me? 38 Verily, verily, I say unto thee, The cock shall not crow, till thou hast denied me thrice. 1 Or, was 2 Or, even as I loved you, that ye also may love one another 384 THE FOUR GOSPELS. CCLXXII. CHRIST COMFORTING THE DISCIPLES UNDER THE PROSPECT OF HIS DEPARTURE, EXPLAINS HIS RELATION TO THE FATHER AND TO THEM. S. John xiv. 1 — 14. j Let not your heart be troubled : ! ye believe in God, 1 believe also in me. In my Father's house are many 2 mansions ; if it were not so, I would have told you ; for I 3 go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I come again, and will receive you unto 4 myself; that where I am, there ye may be also. 3And whither I go, ye know the way. 5 Thomas saith unto him, Lord, we know not whither thou goest \ how know we the way ? 6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, and the truth, and 7 the life : no one cometh unto the Father, but 4by me. If ye had known me, ye would have known my Father also : from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him. 8 Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us. 9 Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and dost thou not know me, Philip ? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; how sayest thou, Shew us the 1 Or, believe in God 2 Or, abiding-places 3 Many ancient authorities read And whither I go ye know, and the way ye know. 4 Or, through CLOSING SCENES. 385 Father? Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the 10 Father in me ? the words that I say unto you I speak not from myself : but the Father abiding in me doeth his works. Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me : 1 1 or else believe me for the very works' sake. Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, 12 the works that I do shall he do also ; and greater works than these shall he do ; because I go unto the Father. And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, 13 that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If ye shall ask 14 'me any thing in my name, that will I do. CCLXXIII. CHRIST PROMISES THE COMFORTER, EN- LARGES UPON THE EFFECT OF A LOVING OBEDIENCE TO HIS COMMANDMENTS AND FORETELLS THE ILLUMINATING POWER OF THE HOLY SPIRIT. S. John xiv. 15 — 31. If ye love me, ye will keep my commandments. And I l% 10 will "pray the Father, and he shall give you another 3 Comforter, that he may be with you for ever, even the 17 Spirit of truth : whom the world cannot receive ; for it beholdeth him not, neither knoweth him : ye know him ; for he abideth with you, and shall be in you. I will not leave you 4 desolate : I come unto you. Yet l8 a little while, and the world beholdeth me no more ; but ye 1 Many ancient authorities omit me. 2 Gr. make request of. 3 Or, Advocate Or, Helper Gr. Paraclete. 4 Or, orphans H. G. 25 386 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 20 behold me : because I live, ' ye shall live also. In that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I 21 in you. He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me : and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself unto him. 22 Judas (not Iscariot) saith unto him, Lord, what is come to pass that thou wilt manifest thyself unto us, and not unto the world ? 23 Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my word : and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make •24 our abode with him. He that loveth me not keepeth not my words : and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father's who sent me. 25 These things have I spoken unto you, while yet abiding 26 with you. But the 2 Comforter, even the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all that I said unto you. 27 Peace I leave with you ; my peace I give unto you : not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be fearful. 28 Ye heard how I said to you, I go away, and I come unto you. If ye loved me, ye would have rejoiced, because I go unto the Father : for the Father is greater than I. 29 And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye may believe. ?0 I will no more speak much with you, for the prince 1 Or, and ye shall live 2 Or, Advocate Or, Helper Gr. Paraclete. CLOSING SCENES. 387 of the world cometh : and he hath nothing in me ; but that 3T the world may know that I love the Father, and as the Father gave me commandment, even so I do. Arise, let us go hence. CCLXXIV. CHRIST AND THE DISCIPLES LEAVE THE SUPPER CHAMBER. Time. Probably some hours before midnight and the actual hour of betrayal. S. Matt. xxvi. 30. And when they had sung a hymn, they went out. 3° S. Mark xiv. 26. And when they had sung a hymn, they went out. •26 S. Luke xxii. 39. And he came out. 39 CCLXXV. CHRIST'S FAREWELL DISCOURSE AND PRAYER. Time. The interval between Christ's leaving the Supper Chamber and His finally proceeding to the place of betrayal. Note. Having already concluded His teaching as it affected the Dis- ciples individually, Christ now addresses Himself to the wider subject of their continuance as a corporate body after His departure. The near approach of Judas appearing to have been the immediate 25—2 388 THE FOUR GOSPELS. cause of Christ's leaving the Supper Chamber, the place at which the discourse was spoken was probably some house or room of which it could not be said "And Judas which betrayed Him knew the place" (S. John xviii. 2). It may well have been the scene of future gatherings of the Early Church, either the Upper Chamber where the Disciples met after the Resurrection or the house of Mary the mother of John whose surname was Mark (Acts xii. 12). I. UNION WITH CHRIST THE FIRST CONDITION OF ACCEPTABLE PRAYER AND OF ABILITY TO KEEP HIS COMMANDMENTS. S. John xv. 1 — 10. 1 I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman. Every branch in me that beareth not fruit, he taketh it 2 away : and every branch that beareth fruit, he cleanseth it, 3 that it may bear more fruit. Already ye are clean because of the word which I have spoken unto you. 4 Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide in the vine ; so neither can ye, 5 except ye abide in me. I am the vine, ye are the branches : He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same beareth much fruit : for apart from me ye can do nothing. 6 If a man abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered ; and they gather them, and cast them into the 7 fire, and they are burned. If ye abide in me, and my words abide in you, ask whatsoever ye will, and it shall be 8 done unto you. Herein 'is my Father glorified, 2that ye bear much fruit ; and so shall ye be my disciples. 1 Or, was 2 Many ancient authorities read that ye bear much fruit, and be my disciples. CLOSING SCENES. 389 Even as the Father hath loved me, I also have loved 9 you : abide ye in my love. If ye keep my commandments, *o ye shall abide in my love ; even as I have kept my Father's commandments, and abide in his love. 2. LOVE TO ONE ANOTHER SIMILAR TO CHRIST'S OWN LOVE FOR THEM WAS THE SOURCE FROM WHICH THE JOY OF THE DIS- CIPLES MUST SPRING. S. John xv. n — 17. These things have I spoken unto you, that my joy may 11 be in you, and that your joy may be fulfilled. This is my commandment, that ye love one another, 12 even as I have loved you. Greater love hath no man than 13 this, that a man lay down his life for his friends. Ye are 14 my friends, if ye do the things which I command you. No 15 longer do I call you Servants; for the 2 servant knoweth not what his lord doeth : but I have called you friends ; for all things that I heard from my Father I have made known unto you. Ye did not choose me, but I chose you, and 16 appointed you, that ye should go and bear fruit, and that your fruit should abide : that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name, he may give it you. These things I command you, that ye may love one 17 another. 1 Gi\ bondservants. - Gr. bondservant. 390 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 3- THE WORLD WOULD HATE THE DISCIPLES AS IT HAD HATED CHRIST. S. John xv. 18 — 27. 18 If the world hateth you, ]ye know that it hath hated me 19 before it hated you. If ye were of the world, the world would love its own : but because ye are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. 20 Remember the word that I said unto you, A 2 servant is not greater than his lord. If they persecuted me, they will also persecute you ; if they kept my word, they will keep 21 yours also. But all these things will they do unto you for my name's sake, because they know not him that sent me. 22 If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had 23 sin : but now they have no excuse for their sin. He that 24 hateth me hateth my Father also. If I had not done among them the works which none other did, they had not had sin : but now have they both seen and hated both me 25 and my Father. But this cometJi to pass, that the word may be fulfilled that is written in their law, They hated me 26 without a cause. But when the 3 Comforter is come, whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, which 4proceedeth from the Father, he shall bear 27 witness of me : 5and ye also bear witness, because ye have been with me from the beginning. 1 Or, know ye 2 Gr. bondservant. 3 Or, Advocate Or, Helper Gr. Paraclete. 4 Or, goeth forth from 5 Or, and bear ye also witness CLOSING SCENES. 391 4- CHRIST'S DEPARTURE A NECESSARY CONDI- TION OF HIS SENDING THE COMFORTER. S. John xvi. 1 — 11. These things have I spoken unto you, that ye should 1 not be made to stumble. They shall put you out of the synagogues : yea, the 2 hour cometh, that whosoever killeth you shall think that he offereth service unto God. And these things will they do, 3 because they have not known the Father, nor me. But these things have I spoken unto you, that when 4 their hour is come, ye may remember them, how that I told you. And these things I said not unto you from the begin- ning, because I was with you. But now I go unto him that sent me ; and none of you 5 asketh me, Whither goest thou ? But because I have 6 spoken these things unto you, sorrow hath filled your heart. Nevertheless I tell you the truth ■ It is expedient for you 7 that I go away : for if I go not away, the l Comforter will not come unto you ; but if I go, I will send him unto you. And he, when he is come, will convict the world in 8 respect of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgement : of 9 sin, because they believe not on me ; of righteousness, 10 because I go to the Father, and ye behold me no more ; of judgement, because the prince of this world hath been 1 1 judged. 1 Or, Advocate Or, Helper Gr. Paraclete. 392 THE FOUR GOSPELS. CHRIST SPEAKS OF HIS DEPARTURE AND RETURN. S. John xvi. 12 — 24. 12 I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot 13 bear them now. Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he shall guide you into all the truth : for he shall not speak from himself; but what things soever he shall hear, these shall he speak : and he shall declare unto you the 14 things that are to come. He shall glorify me : for he shall 15 take of mine, and shall declare it unto you. All things whatsoever the Father hath are mine : therefore said I, that he taketh of mine, and shall declare it unto you. 16 A little while, and ye behold me no more ; and again a little while, and ye shall see me. 17 Some of his disciples therefore said one to another, What is this that he saith unto us, A little while, and ye behold me not ; and again a little while, and ye shall see me : and, 18 Because I go to the Father? They said therefore, What is this that he saith, A little while? We know not what he saith. 19 Jesus perceived that they were desirous to ask him, and he said unto them, Do ye inquire among yourselves concerning this, that I said, A little while, and ye behold me not, and again a little while, and ye shall see me ? 20 Verily, verily, I say unto you, that ye shall weep and lament, but the world shall rejoice : ye shall be sorrowful, 21 but your sorrow shall be turned into joy. A woman when CLOSING SCENES. 393 she is in travail hath sorrow, because her hour is come : but when she is delivered of the child, she remembereth no more the anguish, for the joy that a man is born into the world. And ye therefore now have sorrow : but I will see 22 you again, and your heart shall rejoice, and your joy no one taketh away from you. And in that day ye shall *ask me nothing. Verily, 23 verily, I say unto you, If ye shall ask anything of the Father, he will give it you in my name. Hitherto have ye asked 24 nothing in my name : ask, and ye shall receive, that your joy may be fulfilled. 6. CHRIST'S WORDS WOULD GIVE HIS DISCIPLES PEACE IN THE COMING TRIBULATION. S. John xvi. 25—33. These things have I spoken unto you in 2 proverbs : the 25 hour cometh, when I shall no more speak unto you in 2 proverbs, but shall tell you plainly of the Father. In that 26 day ye shall ask in my name : and I say not unto you, that I will 3pray the Father for you; for the Father himself loveth 27 you, because ye have loved me, and have believed that I came forth from the Father. I came out from the Father, 28 and am come into the world : again, I leave the world, and go unto the Father. His disciples say, Lo, now speakest thou plainly, and 29 speakest no 4 proverb. Now know we that thou knowest all 30 1 Or, ask nie no question 2 Or, parables 3 Gr. make request of. 4 Or, parable 394 THE FOUR GOSPELS. things, and needest not that any man should ask thee : by this we believe that thou earnest forth from God. •** Jesus answered them, Do ye now believe ? Behold, the hour cometh, yea, is come, that ye shall be scattered, every man to his own, and shall leave me alone : and yet I am not alone, because the Father is with me. 33 These things have I spoken unto you, that in me ye may have peace. In the world ye have tribulation : but be of good cheer ; I have overcome the world. CHRIST COMMITS (i) HIMSELF, (2) THE DISCI- PLES AND (3) ALL WHO SHOULD AFTER- WARDS BELIEVE ON HIM TO THE FA- THER'S KEEPING. S. John xvii. I — 26. 1 These things spake Jesus ; and lifting up his eyes to heaven, he said, Father, the hour is come ; glorify thy Son, that the Son 2 may glorify thee : even as thou gavest him authority over all flesh, that whatsoever thou hast given him, to them he 3 should give eternal life. And this is life eternal, that they should know thee the only true God, and him whom thou 4 didst send, even Jesus Christ. I glorified thee on the earth, having accomplished the work which thou hast given me to do. 5 And now, O Father, glorify thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was. 6 I manifested thy name unto the men whom thou gavest me CLOSING SCENES. 395 out of the world : thine they were, and thou gavest them to me ; and they have kept thy word. Now they know that 7 all things whatsoever thou hast given me are from thee : for the words which thou gavest me I have given unto 8 them ; and they received them, and knew of a truth that I came forth from thee, and they believed that thou didst send me. I ' pray for them : I ' pray not for the world, but for 9 those whom thou hast given me ; for they are thine : and 10 all things that are mine are thine, and thine are mine : and 1 am glorified in them. And I am no more in the world, n and these are in the world, and I come to thee. Holy Father, keep them in thy name which thou hast given me, that they may be one, even as we are. While I 12 was with them, I kept them in thy name which thou hast given me : and I guarded them, and not one of them perished, but the son of perdition • that the scripture might be fulfilled. But now I come to thee ; and these things I 13 speak in the world, that they may have my joy fulfilled in themselves. I have given them thy word; and the world 14 hated them, because they are not of the world, even as I am not of the world. I 'pray not that thou shouldest take 15 them "from the world, but that thou shouldest keep them 2 from 3the evil one. They are not of the world, even as I am 16 not of the world. 4 Sanctify them in the truth : thy word is 17 truth. As thou didst send me into the world, even so sent 18 I them into the world. And for their sakes I 5 sanctify 19 myself, that they themselves also may be sanctified in truth. Neither for these only do I 'pray, but for them also that 20 1 Gr. make -request. - Gr. out of. 3 Or, evil 4 Or, Consecrate 5 consecrate 396 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 21 believe on me through their word ; that they may all be one ; even as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be in us : that the world may believe that thou 22 didst send me. And the glory which thou hast given me I have given unto them ; that they may be one, even as we 23 are one ; I in them, and thou in me, that they may be perfected into one ; that the world may know that thou didst send me, and lovedst them, even as thou lovedst me. 24 Father, lthat which thou hast given me, I will that, where I am, they also may be with me; that they may behold my glory, which thou hast given me : for thou lovedst me before the foundation of the world. 25 O righteous Father, the world knew thee not, but I knew 26 thee ; and these knew that thou didst send me ; and I made known unto them thy name, and will make it known ; that the love wherewith thou lovedst me may be in them, and I in them. CCLXXVI. ON THE WAY TO GETHSEMANE CHRIST HAV- ING FORETOLD THE DESERTION OF THE DISCIPLES AND HIS OWN RESURRECTION, FOR THE THIRD TIME WARNS S. PETER OF HIS DENIAL. Time. Towards midnight. S. Matt. xxvi. 30 — 35 (v. 30 repeated). 30 And when they had sung a hymn, they went out unto the mount of Olives. 31 Then saith Jesus unto them, All ye shall be 2 offended in 1 Many ancient authorities read those whom, 2 Gr. ca?ised to stumble. CLOSING SCENES. 397 me this night : for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep of the flock shall be scattered abroad. But 32 after I am raised up, I will go before you into Galilee. But 33 Peter answered and said unto him, If all shall be ' offended in thee, I will never be Offended. Jesus said unto him, 34 Verily I say unto thee, that this night, before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me thrice. Peter saith unto him, Even if I 35 must die with thee, yet will I not deny thee. Likewise also said all the disciples. S. Mark xiv. 26 — 31 (v. 26 repeated). And when they had sung a hymn, they went out unto 26 the mount of Olives. And Jesus saith unto them, All ye shall be J offended : 27 for it is written, I will smite the shepherd, and the sheep shall be scattered abroad. Howbeit, after I am raised up, I 28 will go before you into Galilee. But Peter said unto him, 29 Although all shall be ' offended, yet will not I. And Jesus 30 saith unto him, Verily I say unto thee, that thou to-day, even this night, before the cock crow twice, shalt deny me thrice. But he spake exceeding vehemently, If I must die with thee, 31 I will not deny thee. And in like manner also said they all. CCLXXVII. THE AGONY IN THE GARDEN. Time. Towards midnight. S. John xviii. 1, 2. When Jesus had spoken these words, he went forth 1 with his disciples over the " brook 3Kidron, where was a 1 Gr. caused to stumble. a Or, ravine Gr. winter torrent. 3 Or, of the Cedars 398 THE FOUR GOSPELS. garden, into the which he entered, himself and his dis- ciples. 2 Now Judas also, which betrayed him, knew the place : for Jesus oft-times resorted thither with his disciples. S. Matt. xxvi. 36 — 46. 36 Then cometh Jesus with them unto *a place called Gethsemane, and saith unto his disciples, Sit ye here, while I go yonder and pray. 37 And he took with him Peter and the two sons of Zebedee, and began to be sorrowful and sore troubled. 38 Then saith he unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrow- ful, even unto death : abide ye here, and watch with me. 39 And he went forward a little, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass away from me : nevertheless, not as I will, but as thou wilt. 40 And he cometh unto the disciples, and findeth them sleeping, and saith unto Peter, 41 What, could ye not watch with me one hour ? 2 Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation : the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak. 42 Again a second time he went away, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if this cannot pass away, except I drink it, thy will be done. 43 And he came again and found them sleeping, for their eyes were heavy. 44 And he left them again, and went away, and prayed a third time, saying again the same words. 1 Gr. an enclosed piece of ground. 2 Or, Watch ye, and pray that ye enter not CLOSING SCENES. 399 Then cometh he to the disciples, and saith unto them, 45 Sleep on now, and take your rest : behold, the hour is at hand, and the Son of man is betrayed unto the hands of sinners. Arise, let us be going : behold, he is at hand 46 that betrayeth me. S. Mark xiv. 32 — 42. And they come unto Ja place which was named Geth- 32 semane : and he saith unto his disciples, Sit ye here, while I pray. And he taketh with him Peter and James and John, 33 and began to be greatly amazed, and sore troubled. And he saith unto them, My soul is exceeding sorrow- 34 ful even unto death : abide ye here, and watch. And he went forward a little, and fell on the ground, 35 and prayed that, if it were possible, the hour might pass away from him. And he said, Abba, Father, all things are possible unto 36 thee ; remove this cup from me : howbeit not what I will, but what thou wilt. And he cometh, and findeth them sleeping, and saith 37 unto Peter, Simon, sleepest thou ? couldest thou not watch one hour ? 2 Watch and pray, that ye enter not into temptation : 38 the spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak. And again he went away, and prayed, saying the same 39 words. And again he came, and found them sleeping, for their 40 eyes were very heavy ; and they wist not what to answer him. 1 Gr. an enclosed piece of ground. 2 Or, Watch ye, and pray that ye enter not 400 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 41 And he cometh the third time, and saith unto them, Sleep on now, and take your rest : it is enough ; the hour is come ; behold, the Son of man is betrayed into the 42 hands of sinners. Arise, let us be going : behold, he that betrayeth me is at hand. S. Luke xxii. 39 — 46 [v. 39 repeated). 39 And he came out, and went, as his custom was, unto the mount of Olives ; and the disciples also followed him. 40 And when he was at the place, he said unto them, Pray that ye enter not into temptation. 41 And he was parted from them about a stone's cast; and 42 he kneeled down and prayed, saying, Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me : nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done. 43 JAnd there appeared unto him an angel from heaven, strengthening him. 44 And being in an agony he prayed more earnestly : and his sweat became as it were great drops of blood falling down upon the ground. 45 And when he rose up from his prayer, he came unto 46 the disciples, and found them sleeping for sorrow, and said unto them, Why sleep ye? rise and pray, that ye enter not into temptation. 1 Many ancient authorities omit ver. 43, 44. CLOSING SCENES. 401 CCLXXVIII. THE BETRAYAL. Time. Midnight. S. Matt. xxvi. 47 — 50. And while he yet spake, lo, Judas, one of the twelve, 47 came, and with him a great multitude with swords and staves, from the chief priests and elders of the people. Now he that betrayed him gave them a sign, saying, 48 Whomsoever I shall kiss, that is he : take him. And straightway he came to Jesus, and said, Hail, 49 Rabbi; and hissed him. And Jesus said unto him, Friend, do that for which thou 50 art come. Then they came and laid hands on Jesus, and took him. S. Mark xiv. 43 — 46. And straightway, while he yet spake, cometh Judas, one 43 of the twelve, and with him a multitude with swords and staves, from the chief priests and the scribes and the elders. Now he that betrayed him had given them a token, 44 saying, Whomsoever I shall kiss, that is he ; take him, and lead him away safely. And when he was come, straightway he came to him, 45 and saith, Rabbi; and 1 kissed him. And they laid hands on him, and took him. 46 1 Gr. kissed him much. H. G. 26 4o2 THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Luke xxii. 47, 48. 47 While he yet spake, behold, a multitude, and he that was called Judas, one of the twelve, went before them ; and N he drew near unto Jesus to kiss him. 48 But Jesus said unto him, Judas, betrayest thou the Son of man with a kiss ? S. John xviii. 3 — 9. 3 Judas then, having received the *band of soldiers, and officers from the chief priests and the Pharisees, cometh thither with lanterns and torches and weapons. 4 Jesus therefore, knowing all the things that were coming upon him, went forth, and saith unto them, 5 Whom seek ye? They answered him, Jesus of Naza- reth. Jesus saith unto them, I am he. And Judas also, which betrayed him, was standing with them. 6 When therefore he said unto them, I am he, they went backward, and fell to the ground. 7 Again therefore he asked them, Whom seek ye ? And they said, Jesus of Nazareth. 8 Jesus answered, I told you that I am he : if therefore ye 9 seek me, let these go their way : that the word might be fulfilled which he spake, Of those whom thou hast given me I lost not one. 1 Or, cohort CLOSING SCENES. 403 CCLXXIX. PETER ATTEMPTS TO DEFEND CHRIST. S. Matt. xxvi. 51 — 54. And behold, one of them that were with Jesus stretched 51 out his hand, and drew his sword, and smote the Servant of the high priest, and struck off his ear. Then saith Jesus unto him, Put up again thy sword 52 into its place : for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword. Or thinkest thou that I cannot beseech 53 my Father, and he shall even now send me more than twelve legions of angels ? How then should the scriptures 54 be fulfilled, that thus it must be ? S. Mark xiv. 47. But a certain one of them that stood by drew his sword, ~ and smote the ' servant of the high priest, and struck off his ear. S. Luke xxii. 49 — 51. And when they that were about him saw what would 49 follow, they said, Lord, shall we smite with the sword ? And a certain one of them smote the Servant of the 50 high priest, and struck off his right ear. But Jesus answered and said, Suffer ye thus far. 5I And he touched his ear, and healed him. 1 Gr. bondservant. 26 2 404 THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. John xviii. 10, n. 10 Simon Peter therefore having a sword drew it, and struck the high priest's ' servant, and cut off his right ear. Now the Servant's name was Malchus. 11 Jesus therefore said unto Peter, Put up the sword into the sheath : the cup which the Father hath given me, shall I not drink it ? CCLXXX. CHRIST ADDRESSES THOSE WHO HAD COME TO TAKE HIM. S. Matt. xxvi. 55, 56. 55 In that hour said Jesus to the multitudes, Are ye come out as against a robber -with swords and staves to seize me ? I sat daily in the temple teaching, and 56 ye took me not. But all this is come to pass, that the scriptures of the prophets might be fulfilled. S. Mark xiv. 48, 49. 48 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Are ye come out, as against a robber, with swords and 49 staves to seize me? I was daily with you in the temple teaching, and ye took me not : but this is done that the scriptures might be fulfilled. S. Luke xxii. 52, 53. 52 And Jesus said unto the chief priests, and captains of the temple, and elders, which were come against him, 1 Gr. bondservant. CLOSING SCENES. 405 Are ye come out, as against a robber, with swords and staves ? When I was daily with you in the temple, ye 53 stretched not forth your hands against me : but this is your hour, and the power of darkness. CCLXXXI. THE DISCIPLES FORSAKE CHRIST. S. Mark xiv. 50 — 52. And they all left him, and fled. 5o And a certain young man followed with him, having a 51 linen cloth cast about him, over his naked body : and they lay hold on him ; but he left the linen cloth, and fled naked. 52 S. Matt. xxvi. 56. Then all the disciples left him, and fled. 56 Note. In order to reconcile certain expressions of S. John with the statements of the Synoptic Gospels, very many have assumed that our Lord and His Disciples anticipated the usual time of eating the Passover. Mr McClellan's arguments, and the evidence he collects shewing the inconsistencies involved in this opinion and the erroneousness of the data upon which it rests, certainly appear altogether unanswerable. With reference to S. John's words "that they might not be defiled but might eat the Passover " he says, "Now we have already certainly shewn that, for the permanent Passover of Canaan, the Paschal Peace- Offerings by Divine Institution were originally included with the Paschal Lamb under the name of 'the Passover] and were under this name slain and eaten on the Paschal Night as part of the Paschal Supper. But we have also shewn that, by an innovation which prevailed in the time of our Lord, these Peace- Offerings, otherwise called Chagigah, were no longer slain and eaten on the Paschal Night with the Paschal Supper, but, whilst retaining their original proper name of 'the Passover,' were, separately from the Lamb, slain and eaten in and after the morning which succeeded the Paschal Night."— McClellan, New Testament, p. 488. CHAPTER XXI. CLOSING SCENES. From the Betrayal TO The Crucifixion. § CCLXXXII. § CCCXXIV. Time. From midnight of Thursday before Easter to the 9th hour, on Good Friday. CCLXXXII. CHRIST IS BOUND AND AFTER A PRELIMI- NARY EXAMINATION BEFORE HIGH PRIEST ANNAS IS SENT TO HIGH PRIEST CAIAPHAS. THE FIRST DENIAL OF S. PETER*. Time. About 1 a.m. S. John xviii. 12 — 24. 12 So the *band and the 2 chief captain, and the officers of T3 the Jews, seized Jesus and bound him, and led him to 1 Or, cohort 2 Or, military tribune Gr. chiliarch. * A comparison of verses 19 and 24 shew that Annas is here spoken of as the High Priest as well as Caiaphas. Both resided in the same Palace, though in different parts of it. CLOSING SCENES. 407 Annas first ; for he was father in law to Caiaphas, which was high priest that year. Now Caiaphas was he which gave counsel to the Jews, 14 that it was expedient that one man should die for the people. And Simon Peter followed Jesus, and so did another 15 disciple. Now that disciple was known unto the high priest, and entered in with Jesus into the court of the high priest ; but Peter was standing at the door without. 16 So the other disciple, which was known unto the high priest, went out and spake unto her that kept the door, and brought in Peter. The maid therefore that kept the door 17 saith unto Peter, Art thou also o?ie of this man's disciples ? He saith, I am not. Now the Servants and the officers were standing their, tS having made 2a fire of coals ; for it was cold ; and they were warming themselves : and Peter also was with them, standing and warming himself. The high priest therefore asked Jesus of his disciples, and 19 of his teaching. Jesus answered him, I have spoken openly to the world; 20 I ever taught in 3 synagogues, and in the temple, where all the Jews come together; and in secret spake I nothing. Why askest thou me? ask them that have heard me, what 21 I spake unto them : behold, these know the things which I said. And when he had said this, one of the officers standing 22 by struck Jesus 4with his hand, saying, Answerest thou the high priest so ? 1 Gr. bondservants, - Gr. a fire of charcoal. 3 Gr. synagogue. 4 Or, with a rod 4o8 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 23 Jesus answered him, If I have spoken evil, bear witness of the evil : but if well, why smitest thou me ? M Annas therefore sent him bound unto Caiaphas the high priest. S. Matt. xxvi. 57, 58. 57 And they that had taken Jesus led him away to the house of Caiaphas the high priest, where the scribes and the elders were gathered together. 58 But Peter followed him afar off, unto the court of the high priest, and entered in, and sat with the officers, to see the end. S. Mark xiv. 53, 54. 53 And they led Jesus away to the high priest : and there come together with him all the chief priests and the elders and the scribes. 54 And Peter had followed him afar off, even within, into the court of the high priest ; and he was sitting with the officers, and warming himself in the light of the fire. S. Luke xxii. 54, 55. 54 And they seized him, and led him away, and brought him into the high priest's house. But Peter followed afar off. ,, And when they had kindled a fire in the midst of the court, and had sat down together, Peter sat in the midst of them. CLOSING SCENES. 409 CCLXXXIII. CHRIST IS SUBJECTED TO A PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION BEFORE CAIAPHAS. Time. About 1 A. M. S. Matt. xxvi. 59 — 66. Now the chief priests and the whole council sought 59 false witness against Jesus, that they might put him to death ; and they found it not, though many false witnesses 60 came. But afterward came two, and said, This man said, I am 61 able to destroy the ' temple of God, and to build it in three days. And the high priest stood up, and said unto him, 62 Answerest thou nothing ? what is it which these witness against thee ? But Jesus held his peace. 63 And the high priest said unto him, I adjure thee by the living God, that thou tell us whether thou be the Christ, the Son of God. Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said : nevertheless I 64 say unto you, Henceforth ye shall see the Son of man sitting at the right hand of power, and coming on the clouds of heaven. Then the high priest rent his garments, saying, He hath 65 spoken blasphemy : what further need have we of wit- nesses ? behold, now ye have heard the blasphemy : what 66 think ye ? They answered and said, He is 2 worthy of death. 1 Or, sanctuary: as in ch. xxiii. 35; xxvii. 5. 3 Gr. liable to. 410 THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Mark xiv. 55 — 64. 55 Now the chief priests and the whole council sought witness against Jesus to put him to death ; and found it not. 56 For many bare false witness against him, and their witness agreed not together. 57 And there stood up certain, and bare false witness against him, saying, 58 We heard him say, I will destroy this 'temple that is made with hands, and in three days I will build another made without hands. 59 And not even so did their witness agree together. 60 And the high priest stood up in the midst, and asked Jesus, saying, Answerest thou nothing ? what is it which these witness against thee ? 61 But he held his peace, and answered nothing. Again the high priest asked him, and saith unto him, Art thou the Christ, the Son of the Blessed ? 62 And Jesus said, I am : and ye shall see the Son of man sitting at the right hand of power, and coming with the clouds of heaven. 63 And the high priest rent his clothes, and saith, What 64 further need have we of witnesses ? Ye have heard the blasphemy : what think ye ? And they all condemned him to be 2 worthy of death. 1 Or, sanctuary a Gr. liable to. CLOSING SCENES. 411 CCLXXXIV. CHRIST IS SPIT UPON, MOCKED AND BUFFETED. S. Matt. xxvi. 67, 68. Then did they spit in his face and buffet him: and some 67 smote him ' with the palms of their hands, saying, 68 Prophesy unto us, thou Christ: who is he that struck thee ? S. Mark xiv. 65. . And some began to spit on him, and to cover his face, 65 and to buffet him, and to say unto him, Prophesy : and the officers received him with 2 blows of their hands. CCLXXXV. CHRIST IS DENIED BY S. PETER AS HE SAT WITH THE SERVANTS BY THE FIRE. Time. During the progress of the preceding events. S. Matt. xxvi. 69, 70. Now Peter was sitting without in the court :c 69 and a maid came unto him, saying, Thou also wast with Jesus the Galilaean. - But he denied before them all, saying, I know not what 70 thou sayest. 1 Or, with rods 2 Or, strokes of rods 412 THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Mark xiv. 66—68. 66 And as Peter was beneath in the court, there cometh 67 one of the maids of the high priest ; and seeing Peter warm- ing himself, she looked upon him, and saith, Thou also wast with the Nazarene, even Jesus. 68 But he denied, saying, ! 1 neither know, nor understand what thou sayest. S. Luke xxii. 56, 57. 56 And a certain maid seeing him as he sat in the light of the fire, and looking stedfastly upon him, said, This man also was with him. tl But he denied, saying, Woman, I know him not. S. John xviii. 25. 25 Now Simon Peter was standing and warming himself. They said therefore unto him, Art thou also one of his disciples ? He denied, and said, I am not. CCLXXXVI. CHRIST IS AGAIN TWICE DENIED BY S. PETER. Ti?ne. 2 A. M. called technically the First Cockcrow. S. Matt. xxvi. 71, 72. 71 And when he was gone out into the porch, another maid saw him, and saith unto them that were there, 1 Or, I neither kndw, nor understand: thou, what sayest thou? CLOSING SCENES. 413 This man also was with Jesus the Nazarene. And again he denied with an oath, I know not the man. 72 S. Mark xiv. 68—70. And he went out into the 'porch ; 2and the cock crew. 68 And the maid saw him, and began again to say to them 69 that stood by, This is one of them. But he again denied it. 70 S. Luke xxii. 58. And after a little while another saw him, and said, 5s Thou also art one of them. But Peter said, Man, I am not. CCLXXXVII. CHRIST IS YET AGAIN DENIED BY S. PETER AND THAT WITH MORE FREQUENCY AND VEHEMENCE. Time. Cockcrow, i.e. 3 A.M. being an hour after the first and an hour before the third of the three points of time known respectively as First Cockcrow, Cockcrow and Third Cockcrow. S. Matt. xxvi. 73 — 75. And after a little while they that stood by came and 73 said to Peter, Of a truth thou also art one of them ; for thy speech bewrayeth thee. Then began he to curse and to 7+ swear, I know not the man. And straightway the cock crew. And Peter remembered the word which Jesus had 75 said, Before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me thrice. And he went out, and wept bitterly. 1 Gr. forecourt. 2 Many ancient authorities omit and the cock crew. 4H THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Mark xiv. 70—72. 70 And after a little while again they that stood by said to Peter, Of a truth thou art one of them; for thou art a Galilean. 71 But he began to curse, and to swear, I know not this man of whom ye speak. 72 And straightway the second time the cock crew. And Peter called to mind the word, how that Jesus said unto him, Before the cock crow twice, thou shalt deny me thrice. 1 And when he thought thereon, he wept. S. Luke xxii. 59 — 62. 59 And after the space of about one hour another confident- ly affirmed, saying, Of a truth this man also was with him : for he is a Gali- laean 60 But Peter said, Man, I know not what thou say est. And immediately, while he yet spake, the cock crew. 61 And the Lord turned, and looked upon Peter. And Peter remembered the word of the Lord, how that he said unto him, Before the cock crow this day, thou shalt deny me thrice. 62 And he went out, and wept bitterly. S. John xviii. 26, 27. 26 One of the 2 servants of the high priest, being a kinsman of him whose ear Peter cut off, saith, Did not I see thee in the garden with him ? 27 Peter therefore denied again : and straightway the cock crew. 1 Or, And he began to weep. - Gr. bondservants. CLOSING SCENES. 415 CCLXXXVIII. CHRIST IS TREATED WITH CONTINUOUS INSULT. Time. From 3 A. m. to 5 a. m. S. Luke xxii. 63 — 65. And the men that held 1 Jesus mocked him, and beat 63 him. And they blindfolded him, and asked him, saying, 64 Prophesy : who is he that struck thee ? And many other things spake they against him, reviling 65 him. CCLXXXIX. CHRIST IS FINALLY RE-EXAMINED BEFORE THE COUNCIL AND SENT BOUND TO PILATE*. Time. From 5 A. M. to 6 A. M. S. Luke xxii. 66 — xxiii. 1. And as soon as it was day, the assembly of the elders of 66 the people was gathered together, both chief priests and scribes ; and they led him away into their council, saying, If thou art the Christ, tell us. 67 But he said unto them, If I tell you, ye will not believe : and if I ask you, ye will not answer. But from henceforth ^8 shall the Son of man be seated at the right hand of the power of God. 1 Gr. him. * The repetitions observable in the final and more formal examina- tion are only such as are common to all re-examinations. 416 THE FOUR GOSPELS. o And they all said, Art thou then the Son of God ? And he said unto them, *Ye say that I am. i And they said, What further need have we of witness ? for we ourselves have heard from his own mouth, i And the whole company of them rose up, and brought him before Pilate. S. Matt, xxvii. i, i. i Now when morning was come, all the chief priests and the elders of the people took counsel against Jesus to put 2 him to death : and they bound him, and led him away, and delivered him up to Pilate the governor. S. Mark xv. i. i And straightway in the morning the chief priests with the elders and scribes, and the whole council, held a con- sultation, and bound Jesus, and carried him away, and delivered him up to Pilate. See also S. John xviii. 28 printed as Section CCXCI. ccxc. THE REMORSE AND DEATH OF JUDAS. S. Matt, xxvii. 3 — 10. 3 Then Judas, which betrayed him, when he saw that he was condemned, repented himself, and brought back the 4 thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders, saying, 1 Or, Ye say it, because I am. CLOSING SCENES. 417 I have sinned in that I betrayed innocent blood. But they said, What is that to us ? see thou to it. And he cast down the pieces of silver into the sanctuary, 5 and departed ; and he went away and hanged himself. And the chief priests took the pieces of silver, and said, 6 It is not lawful to put them into the 2 treasury, since it is the price of blood. And they took counsel, and bought with them the potter's 7 field, to bury strangers in. Wherefore that field was called, 8 The field of blood, unto this day. Then was fulfilled that which was spoken 3by Jeremiah 9 the prophet, saying, And 4they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of him that was priced, 5whom certai?i of the children of Israel did price; and 6they gave them for the potter's field, as the 10 Lord appointed me. CCXCI. JESUS IS TAKEN INTO THE JUDGEMENT HALL, THE JEWS REMAINING OUTSIDE. Time. 6 A.M. S. John xviii. 28. They lead Jesus therefore from Caiaphas into the 28 7 palace : and it was early j and they themselves entered not 1 Many ancient authorities read righteous. 2 Gr. corbanas, that is, sacred treasury. Compare Mark vii. n. 3 Or, through 4 Or, I took 5 Or, who?n they priced on the part of the sons of Israel 6 Some ancient authorities read I gave. 7 Gr. Prcetorium. H. G. 27 4i 8 THE FOUR GOSPELS. into the palace, that they might not be denied, but might eat the passover. * CCXCII. PILATE GOES OUT TO THE JEWS AND SEEKS TO THROW UPON THEM THE RESPONSIBILITY OF DECIDING THE CASE. S. John xviii. 29 — 32. 29 Pilate therefore went out unto them, and saith, What accusation bring ye against this man ? 30 They answered and said unto him, If this man were not an evil doer, we should not have delivered him up unto thee. 31 Pilate therefore said unto them, Take him yourselves, and judge him according to your law. The Jews said unto him, It is not lawful for us to put any man to death : 32 that the word of Jesus might be fulfilled, which he spake, signifying by what manner of death he should die. S. Luke xxiii. 2. And they began to accuse him, saying, 2 We found this man perverting our nation, and forbidding to give tribute to Caesar, and saying that he himself is 8 Christ a king. 1 Gr. Pratorium. 2 Or, an anointed king * See note, p. 405* CLOSING SCENES. 419 CCXCIII. PILATE RE-ENTERS THE JUDGEMENT HALL AND QUESTIONS JESUS. S. John xviii.. 33 — 38. Pilate therefore entered again into the palace, and 33 called Jesus, and said unto him, Art thou the King of the Jews ? Jesus answered, Sayest thou this of thyself, or did others 34 tell it thee concerning me ? Pilate answered, Am I a Jew ? Thine own nation and 35 the chief priests delivered thee unto me : what hast thou done? Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world : if my $6 kingdom were of this world, then would my 2 servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews : but now is my kingdom not from hence. Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then ? 37 Jesus answered, 3Thou sayest that I am a king. To this end have I been born, and to this end am I come into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice. Pilate saith unto him, What is truth ? 38 S. Matt, xxvii. 11. Now Jesus stood before the governor : and the governor 1 1 asked him, saying, Art thou the King of the Jews ? And Jesus said unto him, Thou sayest. 1 Gr. Prcetorutm. 2 Or, officers', as in ver. 3, 12, 18, 11. 3 Or, Thou sayest it, because I am a king. 27 2 42o THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Mark xv. i. And Pilate asked him, Art thou the King of the Jews ? And he answering saith unto him, Thou sayest. S. Luke xxiii. 3. 3 And Pilate asked him, saying, Art thou the King of the Jews ? And he answered him and said, Thou sayest. CCXCIV. PILATE GOES OUT AGAIN TO THE JEWS, JESUS ACCOMPANYING HIM. S. John xviii. 38 (a). 38 And when he had said this, he went out again unto the Jews. S. Matt, xxvii. 12 — 14. 12 And when he was accused by the chief priests and elders, he answered nothing. 13 Then saith Pilate unto him, Hearest thou not how many things they witness against thee ? 14 And he gave him no answer, not even to one word : insomuch that the governor marvelled greatly. S. Mark xv. 3—5. 3 And the chief priests accused him of many things. 4 And Pilate again asked him, saying, CLOSING SCENES. 421 Answerest thou nothing? behold how many things they accuse thee of. But Jesus no more answered anything ; insomuch that 5 Pilate marvelled. ccxcv. PILATE DECLARES THE INNOCENCE OF JESUS, BUT HIS VERDICT PROVOKING VIOLENT OPPOSITION HE REFERS THE DECISION TO HEROD, BY WHOM JESUS IS EXAMINED AT LENGTH. Time. Probably not less than an hour and a half, i.e. from 7 A.M. to 8.30 a.m., it being expressly said that Herod questioned Jesus "in many words." S. Luke xxiii. 4 — 12. And Pilate said unto the chief priests and the 4 multitudes, I find no fault in this man. But they were the more urgent, saying, 5 He stirreth up the people, teaching throughout all Judaea, and beginning from Galilee even unto this place. But when Pilate heard it, he asked whether the man were 6 a Galilaean. And when he knew that he was of Herod's jurisdiction, 7 he sent him unto Herod, who himself also was at Jerusalem in these days. Now when Herod saw Jesus, he was exceeding glad : 8 for he was of a long time desirous to see him, because he had heard concerning him ; and he hoped to see some ' miracle done by him. 1 Gr. sign. 422 THE FOUR GOSPELS. 9 And he questioned him in many words ; but he answered him nothing. 10 And the chief priests and the scribes stood, vehemently accusing him. i j And Herod with his soldiers set him at nought, and mocked him, and arraying him in gorgeous apparel sent him back to Pilate. 12 And Herod and Pilate became friends with each other that very day : for before they were at enmity between themselves. S. John xviii. 38^). 38 And he saith unto them, I find no crime in him. CCXCVI. PILATE RE-ASSEMBLES THE JEWS AND AGAIN DECLARES THE RESULT OF HIS OWN AND OF HEROD'S EXAMINATION OF JESUS. Time. About 8.30 a.m. S. Luke xxiii. 13 — 15. 13 And Pilate called together the chief priests and the rulers 14 and the people, and said unto them, Ye brought unto me this man, as one that perverteth the people : and behold, I, having examined him before you, found no fault in this man touching those things whereof ye 1 5 accuse him : no, nor yet Herod : for he sent him back unto us ; and behold, nothing worthy of death hath been done by him. CLOSING SCENES. 423 CCXCVII. PILATE PROPOSES TO CHASTISE JESUS AND TO RELEASE HIM. S. Matt, xxvii. 15 — 18. Now at 'the feast the governor was wont to release unto 15 the multitude one prisoner, whom they would. And they had then a notable prisoner, called Barabbas. 16 When therefore they were gathered together, Pilate 17 said unto them, Whom will ye that I release unto you? Barabbas, or Jesus which is called Christ? For he knew that for envy they had delivered him up. 18 S. Mark xv. 6 — 10. Now at 'the feast he used to release unto them one 6 prisoner, whom they asked of him. And there was one called Barabbas, lying bound with 7 them that had made insurrection, men who in the insurrection had committed murder. And the multitude went up and began to ask him to do 8 as he was wont to do unto them. And Pilate answered them, saying, 9 Will ye that I release unto you the King of the Jews ? For he perceived that for envy the chief priests had 10 delivered him up. 1 Or, a feast 424 THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Luke xxiii. 16. 16 I will therefore chastise him, and release him. 1 S. John xviii. 39. 39 But ye have a custom, that I should release unto you one at the passover : will ye therefore that I release unto you the King of the Jews ? CCXCVIII. PILATE RECEIVES A MESSAGE FROM HIS WIFE. S. Matt, xxvii. 19. 19 And while he was sitting on the judgement-seat, his wife sent unto him, saying, Have thou nothing to do with that righteous man : for I have suffered many things this day in a dream because ot him. CCXCIX. THE JEWS PREPARE TO RESIST THE DE- CISION OF PILATE. S. Matt, xxvii. 20. 20 Now the chief priests and the elders persuaded the multitudes that they should ask for Barabbas, and destroy Jesus. 1 Many ancient authorities insert ver. 1 7 Now he must needs release unto them at the feast one prisoner. Others add the same words after ver. 19. CLOSING SCENES. 425 S. Mark xv. 11. But the chief priests stirred up the multitude, that he n should rather release Barabbas unto them. ccc. PILATE ASKS FOR, AND REMONSTRATES AGAINST, THE DECISION OF THE JEWS. S. Matt, xxvii. 21 — 23. But the governor answered and said unto them, 21 Whether of the twain will ye that I release unto you ? And they said, Barabbas. Pilate saith unto them, What then shall I do unto Jesus 22 which is called Christ ? They all say, Let him be crucified. And he said, Why, what evil hath he done ? 23 But they cried out exceedingly, saying, Let him be crucified. S. Mark xv. 12 — 14. And Pilate again answered and said unto them, I2 What then shall I do unto him whom ye call the King of the Jews ? And they cried out again, Crucify him. 13 And Pilate said unto them, Why, what evil hath he done ? J4 But they cried out exceedingly, Crucify him. S. Luke xxiii. 18 — 23. But they cried out altogether, saying, 18 Away with this man, and release unto us Barabbas : one 19 426 THE FOUR GOSPELS. who for a certain insurrection made in the city, and for murder, was cast into prison. 20 And Pilate spake unto them again, desiring to release 2 1 Jesus ; but they shouted, saying, Crucify, crucify him. 22 And he said unto them the third time, Why, what evil hath this man done? I have found no cause of death in him : I will therefore chastise him and release him. 23 But they were instant with loud voices, asking that he might be crucified. S. John xviii. 40. 40 They cried out therefore again, saying, Not this man, but Barabbas. Now Barabbas was a robber. CCCI. PILATE HAVING IN ACCORDANCE WITH HIS OWN SENTENCE SCOURGED JESUS, THE SOLDIERS MOCK HIM. Time. 9 A.M. Note. The most generally received explanation of the apparent con- tradiction between the notes of time, "about the sixth hour" in S. John (xix. 14) and the " third hour " in S. Mark (xv. 25) is that S. John uses here and throughout his Gospel the modern Western mode of reckoning time, and means 6 o'clock in the morning. The objections to this view seem to be 1. That this mode of reckoning was as unusual amongst the Greeks and Romans as amongst the Jews 1. 1 For rare exceptions to this statement, see Speaker's Commentary, Additional note on John xix. CLOSING SCENES. 427 2. That this method of computing time is not only not certainly used in any other passage of S. John, but that the supposition that it is so used renders impossible the symbolic interpretation of which his notes of time are uniformly susceptible, and which seems to afford the only explanation of his mention of facts which would not otherwise appear to come up to the standard of importance requisite for their admission into his Gospel. 3. That the previous note of time with reference to our Lord's being taken before Pilate "and it was early {irpuit) " is according to the technical meaning of the original, altogether in accordance with the time specified by the other Evangelists, whereas, if between the time specified as ' early ' and 6 a.m. we have to place all that occurred both before Pilate and Herod, the "early" of S. John must mean a far earlier hour than is consistent either with the probabilities of the case or with the language of the other records1, or even the consistency of the later narrative. Difficult as the question has undoubtedly seemed to many, I cannot help thinking that a perfectly natural and satisfactory solution of the difficulty is to be found in the mere recognition of the totally different object with which the two writers apparently made the statements thus compared. S. Mark, wishing to account for the whole day, and having previously mentioned the early morning, and being about to mention the period between the sixth and the ninth hour, uses the expression " the third hour " as covering the whole of the recognised division of the day which extended from the third to the sixth hour, i.e. from 9 a.m. to 12 o'clock, thus speaking of the Crucifixion as including the whole cariying out of the final sentence of condemnation, or in other words, all the circumstances which immediately preceded it, as well as those which marked its execution. S. John on the other hand, having no such object in view, but wishing to account for the haste with which matters were pressed forward, and to give a second instance of the Pharisaic scrupulosity of those, who nevertheless made no difficulty about putting to death Him of whom the Law and the Prophets had ever spoken, merely says in effect that this haste was due to the fact that the Paraskeue or Paschal Friday was so rapidly advancing to the more strictly observed period of the day, i.e. from the sixth hour and onwards, as to make them afraid lest further delay should 1 For the exact significance of various notes of time, see authori- ties quoted by Mr. Greswell. Diss. Vol. III. 211 — 217. 428 THE FOUR GOSPELS. render it impossible to carry the sentence into effect. Supposing, as the whole narrative would seem to imply, that the carrying out of the sentence occupied three hours, and that the actual crucifixion took place about, or it may be exactly at n o'clock, the requirements of both narratives, thus understood, are fully satisfied. That S. John's motive in mentioning the Paraskeue was of the above kind, seems to be in exact accordance with the reason given by S. John for the Body being at once removed from the cross, and by S. Mark for its speedy burial. The explanation suggested of S. Mark's "third hour" is identical with that given by S. Augustine, who considered that it was meant to extend from the time when the Jews cried " Crucify Him, crucify Him," and to cover the full carrying out of the sentence. S. John xix. i — 3. 1 Then Pilate therefore took Jesus, and scourged him. 2 And the soldiers plaited a crown of thorns, and put it 3 on his head, and arrayed him in a purple garment ; and they came unto him, and said, Hail, King of the Jews ! and they struck him 'with their hands. S. Matt, xxvii. 27 — 30. 27 Then the soldiers of the governor took Jesus into the 2 palace, and gathered unto him the whole 3band. •28 And they 4 stripped him, and put on him a scarlet robe. 29 And they plaited a crown of thorns and put it upon his head, and a reed in his right hand ; and they kneeled down before him, and mocked him, saying, Hail, King of the Jews ! 30 And they spat upon him, and took the reed and smote him on the head. 1 Or, with rods - Gr. Pratorium. See Mark xv. 16. 3 Or, cohort 4 Some ancient authorities read clothed. CLOSING SCENES. 429 S. Mark xv. 16 — 19. And the soldiers led him away within the court, which 16 is the x Prsetorium ; and they call together the whole 2band. And they clothe him with purple, and plaiting a crown 17 of thorns, they put it on him; and they began to salute 18 him, Hail, King of the Jews ! And they smote his head with a reed, and did spit upon 19 him, and bowing their knees worshipped him. CCCII. PILATE MAKES YET ANOTHER ATTEMPT TO SAVE THE LIFE OF JESUS. S. John xix. 4 — 7. And Pilate went out again, and saith unto them, 4 Behold, I bring him out to you, that ye may know that I find no crime in him. Jesus therefore came out, wearing the crown of thorns 5 and the purple garment. And Pilate saith unto them, Behold, the man ! When therefore the chief priests and the officers saw 6 him, they cried out, saying, Crucify him, crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Take him yourselves, and crucify him : for I find no crime in him. The Jews answered him, We have a law, and by that 7 law he ought to die, because he made himself the Son of God. 1 Or, palace 2 Or, cohort 43o THE FOUR GOSPELS. CCCIII. PILATE AGAIN TAKES JESUS BACK INTO THE JUDGEMENT HALL AND QUESTIONS HIM. S. John xix. 8 — n. 8 When Pilate therefore heard this saying, he was the more 9 afraid ; and he entered into the ] palace again, and saith unto Jesus, Whence art thou ? But Jesus gave him no answer, io Pilate therefore saith unto him, Speakest thou not unto me? knowest thou not that I have 2 power to release thee, and have 2 power to crucify thee? ii Jesus answered him, Thou wouldest have no 2power against me, except it were given thee from above : therefore he that delivered me unto thee hath greater sin. CCCIV. PILATE ONCE MORE BRINGS CHRIST FORTH AND RENEWS HIS EFFORTS TO EFFECT HIS RELEASE. Time. About 10*30 a.m. See note p. 426. S. John xix. 12 — 15. r2 Upon this Pilate sought to release him : but the Jews cried out, saying, 1 Gr. Pr(?torin?n. 2 Or, authority CLOSING SCENES. 431 If thou release this man, thou art not Caesar's friend : every one that maketh himself a king !speaketh against Caesar. When Pilate therefore heard these words, he brought 13 Jesus out, and sat down on the judgement-seat at a place called The Pavement, but in Hebrew, Gabbatha. Now it was the Preparation of the passover : 14 it was about the sixth hour. And he saith unto the Jews, Behold, your King ! They therefore cried out, Away with him, away with Aim, 15 crucify him. Pilate saith unto them, Shall I crucify your King ? The chief priests answered, We have no king but Caesar. cccv. PILATE FINALLY YIELDS UP CHRIST TO BE CRUCIFIED. S. Matt, xxvii. 24 — 26. So when Pilate saw that he prevailed nothing, but rather 24 that a tumult was arising, he took water, and washed his hands before the multitude, saying, I am innocent 2of the blood of this righteous man : see ye to it. And all the people answered and said, His blood be on 25 us, and on our children. Then released he unto them Barabbas : 26 but Jesus he scourged and delivered to be crucified. 1 Or, opposeth Ctvsar 2 Some ancient authorities read of this blood: see ye firV. 432 THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Luke xxiii. 23 — 25. 2, And their voices prevailed. 24 And Pilate gave sentence that what they asked for should be done. a. And he released him that for insurrection and murder had been cast into prison, whom they asked for ; but Jesus he delivered up to their will. S. Mark xv. 15. And Pilate, wishing to content the multitude, released unto them Barabbas, and delivered Jesus, when he had scourged him, to be crucified. S. John xix. 16. x6 Then therefore he delivered him unto them to be cru- cified. CCCVI. CHRIST IS LED AWAY TO BE CRUCIFIED. S. Matt, xxvii. 31. 01 And when they had mocked him, they took off from him the robe, and put on him his garments, and led him away to crucify him. 20 S. Mark xv. 20. And when they had mocked him, they took off from him the purple, and put on him his garments. And they lead him out to crucify him. CLOSING SCENES. 433 CCCVII. JESUS ON THE WAY TO THE PLACE OF CRUCIFIXION. S. John xix. 17. They took Jesus therefore. And he went out, bearing 17 the cross for himself. S. Luke xxiii. 26 — 32. And when they led him away, they laid hold upon 26 one Simon of Cyrene, coming from the country, and laid on him the cross, to bear it after Jesus. And there followed him a great multitude of the people, 27 and of women who bewailed and lamented him. But Jesus turning unto them said, 28 Daughters of Jerusalem, weep not for me, but weep for yourselves, and for your children. For behold, the days 29 are coming, in which they shall say, Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that never bare, and the breasts that never gave suck. Then shall they begin to say to the mountains, 30 Fall on us ; and to the hills, Cover us. For if they do 31 these things in the green tree, what shall be done in the dry? And there were also two others, malefactors, led with 32 him to be put to death. S. Matt, xxvii. 32. And as they came out, they found a man of Cyrene, 32 Simon by name : him they 1 compelled to go with them, that he might bear his cross. 1 Gr. impressed. H. G. 28 434 THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Mark xv. 21. 21 And they 'compel one passing by, Simon of Cyrene, coming from the country, the father of Alexander and Rums, to go with them, that he might bear his cross. CCCVIII. CHRIST REFUSES AN ALLEVIATING POTION. S. Matt, xxvii. 33, 34. 33 And when they were come unto a place called Golgotha, 34 that is to say, The place of a skull, they gave him wine to drink mingled with gall : and when he had tasted it, he would not drink. S. Mark xv. 22, 23. 22 And they bring him unto the place Golgotha, which is, being interpreted, The place of a skull. 23 And they offered him wine mingled with myrrh : but he received it not. CCCIX. CHRIST IS CRUCIFIED WITH TWO THIEVES. Time. Probably 1 1 a.m. See note p. 426. S. John xix. 17, 18. 17 And he went out unto the place called The place of 18 a skull, which is called in Hebrew Golgotha : where they crucified him, and with him two others, on either side one, and Jesus in the midst. 1 (ir. impress. CLOSING SCENES. 435 S. Luke xxiii. 33. And when they came unto the place which is called 33 JThe skull, there they crucified him, and the malefactors, one on the right hand and the other on the left. S. Matt, xxvii. 38. Then are there crucified with him two robbers, one 38 on the right hand, and one on the left. S. Mark xv. 25, .27. And it was the third hour, and they crucified him. 25 And with him they crucify two robbers : one on his 27 right hand, and one on his left. 2 CCCX. CHRIST PRAYS FOR HIS MURDERERS. S. Luke xxiii. 34. "And Jesus said, Father, forgive them ; for they know 34 not what they do. CCCXI. THE SOLDIERS DIVIDE CHRIST'S GARMENTS. S. John xix. 23, 24. The soldiers therefore, when they had crucified Jesus, 23 took his garments, and made four parts, to every soldier a 1 According to the Latin, Calvary, which has the same meaning. 2 Many ancient authorities insert ver. 28 And the scripture was fulfilled, which saith, And he ivas reckoned with transgressors. See Luke xxii. 37. 3 Some ancient authorities omit And yesus said, Father, forgive them ; for they know not 7vhat they do. 28—2 436 THE FOUR GOSPELS. part; and also the ^oat: now the !coat was without seam, woven from the top throughout. 24 They said therefore one to another, Let us not rend it, but cast lots for it, whose it shall be r that the scripture might be fulfilled, which saith, They parted my garments among them, And upon my vesture did they cast lots. These things therefore the soldiers did. S. Mark xv. 24. 24 And they crucify him, and part his garments among them, casting lots upon them, what each should take. S. Matt, xxvii. 35. 35 And when they had crucified him, they parted his garments among them, casting lots. S. Luke xxiii. 34. 34 And parting his garments among them, they cast lots. CCCXII. JESUS IS MOCKED. S. Matt, xxvii. 39 — 43. 39 And they that passed by railed on him, wagging their heads, and saying, 40 Thou that destroyest the 2 temple, and buildest it in three days, save thyself : if thou art the Son of God, come down from the cross. 1 Or, tunic 3 Or, sanctuary CLOSING SCENES. 437 In like manner also the chief priests mocking him, with 4* the scribes and elders, said, He saved others; himself he cannot save. He is the 42 King of Israel ; let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe on him. He trusteth on God ; let him 43 deliver him now, if he desireth him : for he said, I am the Son of God. S. Mark xv. 29 — 32. And they that passed by railed on him, wagging their 29 heads, and saying, Ha ! thou that destroyest the ' temple, and buildest it in 30 three days, save thyself, and come down from the cross. In like manner also the chief priests mocking him 31 among themselves with the scribes said, He saved others; himself he cannot save. Let the 32 Christ, the King of Israel, now come down from the cross, that we may see and believe. S. Luke xxiii. 35 — 37. And the people stood beholding. 35 And the rulers also scoffed at him, saying, He saved others ; let him save himself, if this is the Christ of God, his chosen. And the soldiers also mocked him, coming to him, offering 36 him vinegar, and saying, If thou art the King of the Jews, save thyself. 37 1 Or, can he not save hi?nself? - Or, sanctuary 438 THE FOUR GOSPELS. CCCXIII. A TITLE IS AFFIXED TO THE CROSS. S. Matt, xxvii. 36, 37. And they sat and watched him there. And they set up over his head his accusation written, THIS IS JESUS THE KING OF THE JEWS. S. John xix. 19 — 22. 19 And Pilate wrote a title also, and put it on the cross. And there was written, JESUS OF NAZARETH, THE KING OF THE JEWS. 20 This title therefore read many of the Jews : 'for the place where Jesus was crucified was nigh to the city : and it was written in Hebrew, and in Latin, and in Greek. 21 The chief priests of the Jews therefore said to Pilate, Write not, The King of the Jews ; but, that he said, I am King of the Jews. 22 Pilate answered, What I have written I have written. S. Mark xv. 26. 26 And the superscription of his accusation was written over, THE KING OF THE JEWS. S. Luke xxiii. 38. 38 And there was also a superscription over him, THIS IS THE KING OF THE JEWS. 1 Or, for the place of the city where Jesus was crucified was nigh at hand CLOSING SCENES. 439 CCCXIV. THE TWO THIEVES REPROACH CHRIST. S. Mark xv. 32. And they that were crucified with him reproached him. 32 S. Matt, xxvii. 44. And the robbers also that were crucified with him cast 44 upon him the same reproach. cccxv. JESUS COMMENDS HIS MOTHER TO S. JOHN. S. John xix. 25 — 27. But there were standing by the cross of Jesus his mother, 25 and his mother's sister, Mary the wife of Clopas, and Mary Magdalene. When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple 26 standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold, thy son ! Then saith he to the disciple, Behold, thy mother 1 27 And from that hour the disciple took her unto his own home. CCCXVI. OF THE TWO THIEVES ONE CONTINUES TO REVILE BUT THE OTHER REPENTS. S. Luke xxiii. 39 — 43. And one of the malefactors which were hanged railed on 39 him, saying, 44Q THE FOUR GOSPELS. Art not thou the Christ ? save thyself and us. 40 But the other answered, and rebuking him said, Dost thou not even fear God, seeing thou art in the same 41 condemnation? And we indeed justly; for we receive the due reward of our deeds : but this man hath done nothing amiss. 42 And he said, Jesus, remember me when thou comest 4n thy kingdom. 43 And he said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To-day shalt thou be with me in Paradise. CCCXVII. THE THREE HOURS' DARKNESS. JESUS CRIETH OUT AS ONE FORSAKEN. S. Matt, xxvii. 45 — 47. 45 Now from the sixth hour there was darkness over all the 2 land until the ninth hour. 46 And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani ? that is, My God, my God, 3 why hast thou forsaken me? 47 And some of them that stood there, when they heard it, said, This man calleth Elijah. S. Mark xv. 33 — 35. 33 And when the sixth hour was come, there was darkness over the whole 2land until the ninth hour. 1 Some ancient authorities read into thy kingdom. '-' Or, earth 3 Or, why didst thou forsake me? CLOSING SCENES. 441 And at the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, 34 Eloi, Eloi, lama sabachthani? which is, being interpreted, My God, my God, *why hast thou forsaken me ? And some of them that stood by, when they heard it, 35 said, Behold, he calleth Elijah. S. Luke xxiii. 44, 45^. And it was now about the sixth hour, and a darkness 44 came over the whole 2land until the ninth hour, 3the sun's 45 light failing. CCCXVIII. JESUS SAITH, I THIRST. S. John xix. 28, 29. After this Jesus, knowing that all things are now finished, 28 that the scripture might be accomplished, saith, I thirst. There was set there a vessel full of vinegar : so they put 29 a sponge full of the vinegar upon hyssop, and brought it to his mouth. S. Matt, xxvii. 48, 49. And straightway one of them ran, and took a sponge, 48 and filled it with vinegar, and put it on a reed, and gave him to drink. And the rest said, Let be ; let us see whether Elijah 49 cometh to save him.4 1 Or, why didst thou forsake me? 2 Or, earth 3 Gr. the sun failing. 4 Many ancient authorities add And another took a spear and pierced his side, and there came out water and blood. See John xix. 34. 442 THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Mark xv. 36. 36 And one ran, and filling a sponge full of vinegar, put it on a reed, and gave him to drink, saying, Let be ; let us see whether Elijah cometh to take him down. CCCXIX. JESUS SAITH, IT IS FINISHED. S. John xix. 30. 3° When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished. CCCXX. JESUS DIETH. S. Luke xxiii. 45, 46. 4| And the veil of the temple was rent in the midst. 'And 46 ....... when Jesus had cried with a loud voice, he said, Father, into thy hands I commend my spirit : and having said this, he gave up the ghost. S. John xix. 30. 30 And he bowed his head, and gave up his spirit. S. Matt, xxvii. 50. 50 And Jesus cried again with a loud voice, and yielded up his spirit. S. Mark xv. 37. 37 And Jesus uttered a loud voice, and gave up the ghost. 1 Or, sanctuary 2 Or, And Jrsus, crying with a loud voice, said CLOSING SCENES. 443 CCCXXL SIGNS ACCOMPANYING THE DEATH OF JESUS WITH ANTICIPATORY NOTICE OF SIGNS WHICH FOLLOWED. S. Matt, xxvii. 51 — 53. And behold, the veil of the temple was rent in twain 51 from the top to the bottom ; and the earth did quake ; and the rocks were rent ; and the tombs were opened; and many bodies of the 52 saints that had fallen asleep were raised ; and coming forth 53 out of the tombs after his resurrection they entered into the holy city and appeared unto many. S. Mark xv. 38. And the veil of the l temple was rent in twain from the 38 top to the bottom. CCCXXII. THE TESTIMONY OF THE CENTURION. S. Matt, xxvii. 54. Now the centurion, and they that were with him watch- 54 ing Jesus, when they saw the earthquake, and the things that were done, feared exceedingly, saying, Truly this was 2the Son of God. 1 Or, sanctuary - Or, a son of God 444 THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Mark xv. 39. 39 And when the centurion, which stood by over against him, saw that he 'so gave up the ghost, he said, Truly this man was 2the Son of God. S. Luke xxiii. 47. 47 And when the centurion saw what was done, he glorified God, saying, Certainly this was a righteous man. CCCXXIII. THE CONDUCT OF THE MULTITUDE. S. Luke xxiii. 48. 48 And all the multitudes that came together to this sight, when they beheld the things that were done, returned smiting their breasts. CCCXXIV. WOMEN AND ACQUAINTANCE BEHOLDING FROM AFAR. 8. Matt, xxvii. 55, 56. 55 And many women were there beholding from afar, which had followed Jesus from Galilee, ministering unto him : 56 among whom was Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James and Joses, and the mother of the sons of Zebedee. 1 Many ancient authorities read so cried out, and gave up the ghost. 2 Or, a Son of God CLOSING SCENES. 445 S. Mark xv. 40, 41. And there were also women beholding from afar: among 4o whom were both Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James the Hess and of Joses, and Salome; who, when he 4i was in Galilee, followed him, and ministered unto him ; and many other women which came up with him unto Jerusalem. S. Luke xxiii. 49. And all his acquaintance, and the women that followed 49 with him from Galilee, stood afar off, seeing these things. 1 Gr. little. CHAPTER XXII. § CCCXXV. § CCCLXIV. The Burial, Resurrection and Ascension of Christ. Time. From the Paraskeue, or Paschal Friday, to the Day of the Ascension. CCCXXV. THEY SHALL LOOK ON HIM WHOM THEY PIERCED. S. John xix. 31—37. 31 The Jews therefore, because it was the Preparation, that the bodies should not remain on the cross upon the sabbath (for the day of that sabbath was a high day), asked of Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away. 32 The soldiers therefore came, and brake the legs of the first, and of the other which was crucified with him : but 33 when they came to Jesus, and saw that he was dead 34 already, they brake not his legs : howbeit one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his side, and straightway there came out blood and water. CLOSING SCENES. 447 And he that hath seen hath borne witness, and his 35 witness is true : and he knoweth that he saith true, that ye also may believe. For these things came to pass, that 36 the scripture might be fulfilled, A bone of him shall not be broken. And again another scripture saith, 37 They shall look on him whom they pierced. CCCXXVI. THE BODY OF JESUS IS GIVEN TO JOSEPH OF ARIMATH^A. S. Mark xv. 42 — 45. And when even was now come, because it was the 42 Preparation, that is, the day before the sabbath, there came 43 Joseph of Arimathsea, a councillor of honourable estate, who also himself was looking for the kingdom of God ; and he boldly went in unto Pilate, and asked for the body of Jesus. And Pilate marvelled if he were already dead : and 44 calling unto him the centurion, he asked him whether he 2 had been any while dead. And when he learned it of the centurion, he granted the 45 corpse to Joseph. S. Luke xxiii. 50 — 52. And behold, a man named Joseph, who was a councillor, 50 a good man and a righteous (he had not consented to their 51 1 Or, crushed - Many ancient authorities reader*? already dead. 448 THE FOUR GOSPELS. counsel and deed), a man of Arimathaea, a city of the Jews, 52 who was looking for the kingdom of God : this man went to Pilate, and asked for the body of Jesus. S. Matt, xxvii. 57, 58. 57 And when even was come, there came a rich man from Arimathsea, named Joseph, who also himself was Jesus' 58 disciple : this man went to Pilate, and asked for the body of Jesus. Then Pilate commanded it to be given up. S. John xix. 38. 38 And after these things Joseph of Arimathsea, being a disciple of Jesus, but secretly for fear of the Jews, asked of Pilate that he might take away the body of Jesus : and Pilate gave him leave. He came therefore, and took away his body. CCCXXVII. NICODEMUS JOINS WITH JOSEPH IN PREPAR- ING THE BODY OF JESUS FOR BURIAL. S. John xix. 39, 40. 39 And there came also Nicodemus, he who at the first came to him by night, bringing a * mixture of myrrh and aloes, about a hundred pound weight. 40 So they took the body of Jesus, and bound it in linen cloths with the spices, as the custom of the Jews is to bury. 1 Some ancient authorities read roll. CLOSING SCENES. 449 S. Matt, xxvii. 59. And Joseph took the body, and wrapped it in a clean 59 linen cloth. S. Mark xv. 46. And he bought a linen cloth, and taking him down, 46 wound him in the linen cloth. S. Luke xxiii. 53. And he took it down, and wrapped it in a linen cloth. $?> CCCXXVIII. JESUS IS BURIED. S. John xix. 41, 42. Now in the place where he was crucified there was a 41 garden ; and in the garden a new tomb wherein was never man yet laid. There then because of the Jews' Preparation (for the 42 tomb was nigh at hand) they laid Jesus. S. Luke xxiii. 53, 54. And they laid him in a tomb that was hewn in stone, 53 where never man had yet lain. And it was the day of the Preparation, and the sabbath 54 1 drew on. S. Matt, xxvii. 60. And he laid it in his own new tomb, which he had hewn 60 out in the rock. 1 Gr. began to dawn. II. G. 29 45o THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Mark xv. 46. 46 And he laid him in a tomb which had been hewn out of a rock. CCCXXIX. THE SEPULCHRE IS CLOSED. S. Matt, xxvii. 60. Co And he rolled a great stone to the door of the tomb, and departed. S. Mark xv. 46. 46 And he rolled a stone against the door of the tomb. cccxxx. MARY MAGDALENE AND THE OTHER MARY SIT BY THE SEPULCHRE. S. Matt, xxvii. 61. 61 And Mary Magdalene was there, and the other Mary, sitting over against the sepulchre. S. Mark xv. 47. 47 And Mary Magdalene and Mary the mother of Joses beheld where he was laid. CLOSING SCENES. 45 * CCCXXXL THE WOMEN FROM GALILEE PREPARE SPICES AND OINTMENTS. S. Luke xxiii. 55, 56. And the women, which had come with him out of 55 Galilee, followed after, and beheld the tomb, and how his body was laid. And they returned, and prepared spices and ointments. 56 CCCXXXIL THE SEPULCHRE IS SEALED AND WATCHED. S. Matt, xxvii. 62 — 66. Now on the morrow, which is the day after the Prepara- 62 tion, the chief priests and the Pharisees were gathered together unto Pilate, saying, 63 Sir, we remember that that deceiver said, while he was yet alive, After three days I rise again. Command therefore that the sepulchre be made sure 64 until the third day, lest haply his disciples come and steal him away, and say unto the people, He is risen from the dead : and the last error will be worse than the first. Pilate said unto them, 'Ye have a guard : go your way, 65 2 make it as sure as ye can. So they went, and made the sepulchre sure, sealing the 66 stone, the guard being with them. 1 Or, Take a guard 2 Gx. make it sure, as ye know. 29 — 2 452 THE FOUR GOSPELS. CCCXXXIIL LATE ON THE SABBATH DAY MARY MAGDA- LENE AND MARY THE MOTHER OF JAMES AND JOSES VISIT THE SEPULCHRE. S. Matt, xxviii. I. i Now late on the sabbath day, as it began to dawn [i.e. to draw on]* toward the first day of the week, came Mary Magdalene and the other Mary to see the sepulchre. CCCXXXIV. WHEN THE SABBATH WAS PAST THE TWO MARYS AND SALOME BUY SPICES. S. Mark xvi. i. i And when the sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, and Salome, bought spices, that they might come and anoint him. cccxxxv. THE STONE ROLLED AWAY FROM THE SEPULCHRE. Time. On the first day of the week, before Mary Magdalene arrived at the Sepulchre. S. Matt, xxviii. 2 — 4. 1 And behold, there was a great earthquake ; for an angel of the Lord descended from heaven, and came and rolled 3 away the stone, and sat upon it. His appearance was as 4 lightning, and his raiment white as snow : and for fear of him the watchers did quake, and became as dead men. * Compare use of same word in Luke xxiii. 54, where the reference can only be to the afternoon. CLOSING SCENES. 453 CCCXXXVI. ON THE MORNING OF THE FIRST DAY OF THE WEEK, WHILE IT WAS YET DARK, MARY MAGDALENE COMES ALONE TO THE SEPULCHRE. S. John xx. 1. Now on the first day of the week cometh Mary 1 Magdalene early, while it was yet dark, unto the tomb, and seeth the stone taken away from the tomb. CCCXXXVII. AT EARLY DAWN MARY MAGDALENE IS JOINED BY THE WOMEN FROM GALILEE, AND AFTER SUNRISE BY MARY THE MOTHER OF JAMES AND SALOME. S. Luke xxiii. 56 — xxiv. 1. And on the sabbath they rested according to the commandment. But on the first day of the week, at early dawn, they 1 came unto the tomb, bringing the spices which they had prepared. S. Mark xvi. 2. And very early on the first day of the week, they come * to the tomb when the sun was risen. 454 THE FOUR GOSPELS. CCCXXXVIII. THE STONE IS FOUND TO BE ROLLED BACK. S. Mark xvi. 3, 4. 3 And they were saying among themselves, Who shall roll 4 us away the stone from the door of the tomb ? and looking up, they see that the stone is rolled back : for it was exceed- ing great. S. Luke xxiv. 2. 2 And they found the stone rolled away from the tomb. CCCXXXIX. AN ANGEL ANNOUNCES THE RESURRECTION, AND INVITES THE WOMEN TO ENTER THE SEPULCHRE. S. Matt, xxviii. 5, 6. 5 And the angel answered and said unto the women, Fear not ye : for I know that ye seek Jesus, which hath 6 been crucified. He is not here ; for he is risen, even as he said. Come, see the place * where the Lord lay. CCCXL. ENTERING INTO THE SEPULCHRE IN COM- PANY WITH THE ANGEL A SECOND ANGEL APPEARS TO THEM. S. Mark xvi. 5. 5 And entering into the tomb, they saw a young man sitting on the right side, arrayed in a white robe. 1 Many ancient authorities read where he lay. CLOSING SCENES. 455 S. Luke xxiv. 3, 4. And they entered in, and found not the body Jof the 3 Lord Jesus. And it came to pass, while they were perplexed 4 thereabout, behold, two men stood by them in dazzling apparel. CCCXLL THE WOMEN ARE AFFRIGHTED. S. Mark xvi. 5. And they were amazed. 5 S. Luke xxiv. 5. And as they were affrighted, and bowed down their faces 5 to the earth — . CCCXLII. THE ANGELS ADDRESS THE WOMEN. S. Mark xvi. 6, 7. And he saith unto them, r> Be not amazed : ye seek Jesus, the Nazarene, which hath been crucified : he is risen ; he is not here : behold, the place where they laid him ! But go, tell his disciples and Peter, He goeth before you 7 into Galilee : there shall ye see him, as he said unto you. 1 Some ancient authorities omit of the Lord Jesus. 456 THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Matt, xxviii. 7. 7 And go quickly, and tell his disciples, He is risen from the dead ; and lo, he goeth before you into Galilee ; there shall ye see him : lo, I have told you. S. Luke xxiv. 5 — 7. 5 They said unto them, Why seek ye Jthe living among the dead? 2He is not 6 here, but is risen : remember how he spake unto you when 7 he was yet in Galilee, saying that the Son of man must be delivered up into the hands of sinful men, and be crucified, and the third day rise again. CCCXLIII. MOST OF THE WOMEN FLEE FROM THE SE- PULCHRE WITHOUT ATTEMPTING TO MAKE KNOWN THE FACT OF THE RESUR- RECTION. S. Mark xvi. 8. 8 And they went out, and fled from the tomb; for trembling and astonishment had come upon them : and they said nothing to any one ; for they were afraid. 1 Gr. him that liveth. - Some ancient authorities omit He is not here, but is risen. CLOSING SCENES. 457 CCCXLIV. MARY MAGDALENE AND THE OTHER MARY ALONE ACT IMMEDIATELY UPON THE COMMAND GIVEN BY THE ANGEL, AND COMMUNICATE THE FACT OF THE RE- SURRECTION IN THE FIRST INSTANCE TO PETER AND JOHN, WHO RUN TO THE TOMB, MARY MAGDALENE RETURNING WITH THEM*. S. Matt, xxviii. 8. And they departed quickly from the tomb with fear and They therefore, when they were come together, asked him, saying, Lord, dost thou at this time restore the kingdom to Israel? 7 And he said unto them, It is not for you to know times or seasons, which the Father hath 5set within his own 8 authority. But ye shall receive power, when the Holy Ghost is come upon you : and ye shall be my witnesses both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea and Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth. 1 Or, Holy Spirit: and so throughout this book. 2 Gr. presented. 3 Or, eating with them 4 Or, in 5 Or, appointed by CLOSING SCENES. 473 S. Luke xxiv. 44 — 49. And he said unto them, These are my words which I 44 spake unto you, while I was yet with you, how that all things must needs be fulfilled, which are written in the law of Moses, and the prophets, and the psalms, concerning me. Then opened he their mind, that they might understand 45 the scriptures ; and he said unto them, 4^ Thus it is written, that the Christ should suffer, and rise again from the dead the third day; and that repentance 47 1 and remission of sins should be preached in his name unto all the 2nations, beginning from Jerusalem. Ye are witnesses 4s of these things. And behold, I send forth the promise of 49 my Father upon you : but tarry ye in the city, until ye be clothed with power from on high. CCCLXI. THE ASCENSION. S. Luke xxiv. 50, 51. And he led them out until they were over against 50 Bethany : and he lifted up his hands, and blessed them. And it came to pass, while he blessed them, he parted 51 from them, 3and was carried up into heaven. Acts i. 9. And when he had said these things, as they were looking, 9 he was taken up ; and a cloud received him out of their sight. 1 Some ancient authorities read unto. 2 Or, nations. Beginning from Jerusalem, ye are witnesses 3 .Some ancient authorities omit and was carried up into heaven* 474 THE FOUR GOSPELS. S. Mark xvi. 19. 19 So then the Lord Jesus, after he had spoken unto them, was received up into heaven, and sat down at the right hand of God. CCCLXIL THE PROMISE OF CHRIST'S RETURN. Acts i. 10, 11. 10 And while they were looking stedfastly into heaven as he went, behold, two men stood by them in white apparel; 1 1 which also said, Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye looking into heaven? this Jesus, which was received up from you into heaven, shall so come in like manner as ye beheld him going into heaven. CCCLXIII. THE DISCIPLES RETURN TO JERUSALEM. S. Luke xxiv. 52, 53. 52 And they * worshipped him, and returned to Jerusalem 53 with great joy : and were continually in the temple, blessing God. Acts i. 12 — 14. 12 Then returned they unto Jerusalem from the mount called Olivet, which is nigh unto Jerusalem, a sabbath day's journey off. 1 Some ancient authorities omit worshipped him, and. CLOSING SCENES. 475 And when they were come in, they went up into the 13 upper chamber, where they were abiding; both Peter and John and James and Andrew, Philip and Thomas, Bartholo- mew and Matthew, James the son of Alphseus, and Simon the Zealot, and Judas the x son of James. These all with one accord continued stedfastly in prayer, m 'with the women, and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with his brethren. CCCLXIV. THE APOSTLES GO FORTH TO PREACH THE GOSPEL. S. Mark xvi. 20. And they went forth, and preached everywhere, the Lord 20 working with them, and confirming the word by the signs that followed. Amen. 1 Or, brother. See Jude 1. - Or, with certain women Cambridge: printed by c. j. clay, m.a. and son, at the university tress. Clje Cambrtofle %Mt for eljoote anO Colleges* General Editor : The Very Reverend J. J. S. Perowne, D.D., Dean of Peterborough. The want of an Annotated Edition of the Bible, in handy portions, suitable for School use, has long been felt. The Very Reverend J. J. S. Perowne, D.D., Dean of Peterborough, has undertaken the general editorial supervision of the work, assisted by a staff of eminent coadjutors. Some of the books have been already edited or undertaken by the following gentlemen : Rev. A. Carr, M. A., late Assistant Master at Wellington College. Rev. T. K. Cheyne, M.A., D.D., late Fellow of Balliol College, Oxford. Rev. S. Cox, Nottingham. Rev. A. B. Davidson, D.D., Professor of Hebrew, Edinbtcrgh. The Ven. F. W. Farrar, D.D., Archdeacon of Westminster. Rev. C. D. Ginsburg, LL.D. Rev. A. E. Humphreys, M.A., late Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. Rev. A. F. Kirkpatrick, M.A., Fellow of Trinity College, Regius Professor of Hebrew. Rev. J. J. Lias, M.A., late Professor at St David's College, Lampeter. Rev. J. R. Lumby, D.D., Norrisian Prof essor of Divinity . Rev. G. F. Maclear, D.D., Warden of St Augustine 's College, Canterbury Rev. H. C. G. Moule, M.A., late Fellow of Trinity College, Principal of Ridley Hall, Cambridge. Rev. W. F. Moulton, D.D., Head Master of the Leys School, Cambridge. Rev. E. H. Perowne, D.D., Master of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. The Ven. T. T. Perowne, M.A., Archdeacon of Norwich. Rev. A. Plummer, M.A., D.D., Master of University College, Durham. The Very Rev. E. H. Plumptre, D.D., Dean of Wells. Rev. W. Simcox, M.A., Rector of Weyhill, Hants. The Very Rev. R. Payne Smith, D.D., Dean of Canterbury. W. Robertson Smith, M.A., Lord Almoner's Professor of Arabic. Rev. H. D. M. Spence, M.A., Hon. Canon of Gloucester Cathedral. Rev. A. W. Streane, M.A., Fellow of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge. London : C. J. Cla y &* Son, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. PUBLICATIONS OF THE CAMBRIDGE BIBLE FOR SCHOOLS & COLLEGES. Continued. " It is difficult to commend too highly this excellent series, the volumes of which are now becoming numerous." — Guardian. "The modesty of the general title of this series has, we believe, led many to misunderstand its character and underrate its value. The books are well suited for study in the upper forms of our best schools, but not the less are they adapted to the wants of all Bible students who are not specialists. We doubt, indeed, whether any of the numerous popular commentaries recently issued in this country will be found more serviceable for general use." — Academy. "Of great value. The whole series of comments for schools is highly esteemed by students capable of forming a judgment. The books are scholarly without being pretentious: information is so given as to be easily understood." — Szuord and Trowel. Now Ready. Cloth, Extra Fcap. 8vo. THE BOOK OF JOSHUA. By the Rev. G. F. Maclear, D.D. With 2 Maps. is. 6d. THE BOOK OF JUDGES. By the Rev. J. J. Lias, M.A. With Map. 3-r. 6d. THE FIRST BOOK OF SAMUEL. By the Rev. Professor Kirkpatrick, M.A. With Map. 3^. 6d. THE SECOND BOOK OF SAMUEL. By the Rev. Professor Kirkpatrick, M.A. With 2 Maps. 3s. 6d. THE BOOK OF JOB. By the Rev. A. B. Davidson, D.D. $s. THE BOOK OF ECCLESIASTES. By the Very Rev. E. H. Plumptre, D.D., Dean of Wells. 5J. THE BOOK OF JEREMIAH. By the Rev. A. W. Streane, M.A. With Map. 4*. 6d. THE BOOK OF HOSEA. By Rev. T. K. Cheyne, M.A, D.D. 3* THE BOOKS OF OBADIAH AND JONAH- By Archdeacon Perowne. is. 6d. THE BOOK OF MICAH. By Rev. T. K. Cheyne, M.A., D.D. IS. 6d. THE BOOKS OF HAGGAI AND ZECHARIAH. By Arch- deacon Perowne. y. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MATTHEW. By the Rev. A. Carr, M.A. With 2 Maps. 2s. 6d. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MARK. By the Rev. G. F. Maclear, D.D. With 4 Maps. is. 6d. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST LUKE. By Archdeacon F. W. Farrar. With 4 Maps. 4J. 6d. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST JOHN. By the Rev. A. Plummer, M.A., D.D. With 4 Maps. 4s. 6d. London : C.J. Clay & Son, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. THE CAMBRIDGE BIBLE FOR SCHOOLS & COLLEGES. Continued. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. By the Rev. Professor Lumby, D.D. With 4 Maps. ±s. 6d. THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS. By the Rev. H. C. G. Moule, M.A. 3J-. 6d. THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS. By the Rev. J. J. Lias, M.A. With a Map and Plan. 2s. THE SECOND EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS. By the Rev. J. J. Lias, M.A. aj. THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. By Archdeacon Farrar. y. 6d. THE GENERAL EPISTLE OF ST JAMES. By the Very Rev. E. H. Plumptre, D.D., Dean of Wells, is. 6d. THE EPISTLES OF ST PETER AND ST JUDE. By the same Editor, is. 6d. THE EPISTLES OF ST JOHN. By the Rev. A. Plummer, M.A..D.D. 3j. 6d. Preparing. THE BOOK OF GENESIS. By the Very Rev. R. Payne Smith, D.D. THE BOOKS OF EXODUS, NUMBERS AND DEUTERO- NOMY. By the Rev. C. D. Ginsburg, LL.D. THE FIRST AND SECOND BOOKS OF KINGS. By the Rev. Prof. Lumby, D.D. THE BOOK OF PSALMS. By the Rev. Prof. Kirkpatrick M.A. THE BOOK OF ISAIAH. By Prof. W. Robertson Smith, M.A. THE BOOK OF EZEKIEL. By the Rev. A. B. Davidson, D.D. THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS. By the Rev. E. H. Perowne, D.D. THE EPISTLES TO THE EPHESIANS, PHILIPPIANS, COLOSSIANS AND PHILEMON. By the Rev. H. C. G. Moule, M.A. THE BOOK OF REVELATION. By the Rev. W. Simcox, M.A. London : C. J. Cla y &> SON, Cambridge University Press Warehouse, Ave Maria Lane. THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS. THE CAMBRIDGE GREEK TESTAMENT FOR SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES, with a Revised Text, based on the most recent critical authorities, and English Notes, prepared under the direction of the General Editor, The Very Reverend J. J. S. PEROWNE, D.D. Now Ready. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MATTHEW. By the Rev. A. Carr, M.A. With 4 Maps. 4s. 6d. " Copious illustrations, gathered from a great variety of sources, make his notes a very valu- able aid to the student. They are indeed remarkably interesting, while all explanations on meanings, applications, and the like are distinguished by their lucidity and good sense." — Pall Mall Gazette. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST MARK. By the Rev. G. F. Maclear, D.D. With 3 Maps. 4*. 6d. "The Cambridge Greek Testament, of which Dr Maclear's edition of the Gospel according to St Mark is a volume, certainly supplies a want. Without pretending to compete with the leading commentaries, or to embody very much original research, it forms a most satisfactory introduction to the study of the New Testament in the original . . . Dr Maclear's introduction contains all that is known of St Mark's life, with references to passages in the New Testament in which he is mentioned; an account of the circumstances in which the Gospel was composed, with an estimate of the influence of St Peter's teaching upon St Mark ; an excellent sketch of the special character- istics of this Gospel ; an analysis, and a chapter on the text of the New Testament generally . . . The work is completed by three good maps." — Saturday Review. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST LUKE. By Archdeacon Farrar. With 4 Maps. 6s. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST JOHN. By the Rev. A. Plummer, M.A., D.D. With 4 Maps. 6s. "A valuable addition has also been made to 'The Cambridge Greek Testament for Schools,' Dr Plummer's notes on ' the Gospel according to St John ' are scholarly, concise, and instructive, and embody the results of much thought and wide reading." — Expositor. THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. By the Rev. Prof. Lumby, D.D., with 4 Maps. 6s. THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS. By the Rev. J. J. Lias, M.A. [In the Press. THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. By Archdeacon Farrar. [Preparing. THE EPISTLES OF ST JOHN. By the Rev. A. Plummer, M.A., D.D. 4j. THE AUTHORIZED EDITION OF THE ENGLISH BIBLE (161 1), ITS SUBSEQUENT REPRINTS AND MODERN REPRE- SENTATIVES. Being the Introduction to the Cambridge Paragraph Bible (1873), re-edited with corrections and additions. By F. H. A. Scrivener, M.A., D.C.L., LL.D., Prebendary of Exeter and Vicar of Hendon. Crown 8vo. 7 s. 6d. Eontiori: C. J. CLAY and SON, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, AVE MARIA LANE. Date Due «UA -?— 00 i ~~ 9