2 2>. ~2S \ rn-r * CHRIST ON HIS THRONE. OR, *g ChriilsChurch-government brief- ly laid downc • and how it ought to bee fet up in all thrift ian Con- gregations. Refolvcd in fundry Cafes of Confcicncc. I- EH. 6.14. Thus fditb the Lord ; Stand je in the wyes , awd fee and aske for the old paths, where is the£oodway x andwalkjhcre- tn-i and je jhall fade reft for jour foulcs. LVKE I9.27. But thofe wine Enemies , which would not that I fhould r raigne ever them, Isrong them hither and flay them before me. Printed in the yeare \6\o. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2012 with funding from Princeton Theological Seminary Library http://archive.org/details/vindicationofpreOOwalk t/»c«» w>o>em ~- A VINDICATION OF THE Presbyteriall - Government , MINISTRY: TOGETHER, With an Exhartation 5 to all the Ministers, Elders, and People, within the Bounds of the Province of London, whether joyning with Us, or iepaming from Us. T filliped, *Bj the Adimfters >and Eldtrs, met together in a TrovirtcUli slftcmblj, Novemb. 2 d . .1649. Whcrein,aniongit other dung^thefc enfuirg paiticulars aie contained; r . That there is a Cbwib-Gvi ] Dh inc R'ghc. •1. the Magiftratc^ not the Fountain (>/Ch.,:ch-Gvern;ncnt, 3 t Th.it the Prcsbytcrial-Govcrnment,/* by Divine R ; ght. 4.. The lviconven\cncics of the ■■Congiegarionjll ■: That the Rul ng-Eldcr is by Divine R ghr. .- it is the mil 0/Jefus thrift, that allfwls of pa-fops Jbouldgve cm Air count oftbiir haitlyo the M'uTtcr, and hitersjiifat admijjivn to tk Supper •, togttbi 1 with Anfwci v . 'I it. ■ lions tuj.. admitted tQ Supper,/., fying o/GodsName,/// 9. Ruk \t\c.fom the hi iojii> of thefe Times. iratibn ft ■ II j charged -frith Sch u.TW Min.iK: wmvf Ordinal'. ' Catcchi;. Licenfedj Entrc d according to Order. London Printed for f. Moedttb 3 2t th i Church-yard, rjvnwv/rjrrj^v7J& r ^ T hath been the chief fir at agem of the ad- verfaries of the Churchy in all Ages, to eretl athwncfor themfelvesAn the hearts of people, by fafting reproaches and (lan- ders upon the Dotf rirte , Government, and Godly Miniikrs o/Jefus Chrilh In the old Teftament % frhenthe fefres came firfl out cf Jabylon, and be fan to build the fecond Temple of Jerufalem, their enemies mofi f. il fly tfnd matt* :iouJlj, fugg-ftedtp King Artaxerxes, That the City of Jeiu- E?,ra 4.1^24. falem,was a rebellious City, and hurtful unto Kings and Pro- vinces, and that they had moved fedition within the fame, of old tvme,&C. And thereby caufedthefrorl^of the honfe of qod, to ceafefor many years, <*And in the 2{ew Teftament>frhen the Holy Ghoft came down from Heaven in a moft miraculous manner, for the folcmn inauguration of Chriftian Religion ; ndfrhen'the Apoftles Were filled frith the Holy Spirit, even hen, they frcre charged to be full of new wine. And in after- imes, the flandertus accu fat ions of the Heathen Idolaters^ 'ainfl the Chnltiuns are observed to have been one of the chief- ft caufes of the ten bloudy Perfections/**/^ */> agai*ft thtm j H $ m Mmy jy the Romanc limpcrours. csfnd this was that which forced rj Apolopa. he Godly- learned of thofe day s, to write Apologies, in defence TertnLUfct. ^Chriitians^mdChrillunRclrgion. To come neerer to our own times ; when the Proteftant Relt- non began to be re eft ai lifted (after tlx bloudy times efJ&'etH A 2 Mary) Mary) #7 T9*t loaded Wt'thfo many infamous lyes, andmalicious JmUi Afoleg. falfities,That Reverend and learned Jewell, was compelled to writean Apologkforit - y for Which, he will be famous in the Churches jo all Pofierity. And even in our day es, when it pie A' fed God, out of hii -infinite goodnefs, toUya foundation of a glorious Reformation in Church-Difcipline,*« this Kingdom^ andtoraipeup the hearts of many Godly Minifters, and other s, to contribute their utmofi help for the perfecting of it /Then did a Generation of men rife up , Who made it their great deftgn to pour out flouds of reproaches ,and calumnies ,upon both Govern' ment,and Minijlers.Firfljhey refrefent the Government unto thepeople,as abfolutcly deftrmflive unto the civill State, to the liberties both of their foul es and bodies, and as unfufferable in a free Kingdom. And then the Minifters that ajfert it,as men thatfeekjo ingrofs all power into their o\\"n hands , as the chief Incendiaries of Church and Stat e, and m th.ee aufes of all the miferies jhat have of late years come upon the three Kingdoms, And therefore, We ,Mini(krs and Elders met together, by the Authority of Parliament , in the Provincial AJfembly of the Province of London, confidering with our felves,What way We might be ferviceable in this great work^ofKt^oVXmt'\on } have thought it ow duties to wipe offthofe foul afperlions, that are cafi upon it, and upon thofe who have been atlivefor it • and to dtsfel the mifls and fogs, 'Which have fo long dafke-ned the glo- rious Sun-Jhineofthis b I effed Reformation. And becaufe we alfefind, that there are many, who doubt, whether there be any particularChureh-government preferred in the W or d\and if fo .whether it be the Presbyterial^r Congre gationall. And others that queftion the lawfulnefs of Ru-ling- Elders, W of their joy ntpoWer, With the Minifler, to examine thofe thAt are admitted to the Sacrament of the Lords Supper ; Therefore, we h*ve alfe thought itmoft neceffary for us to fearch'inPo the Word ,and to deliver our judgments ht all theft particulars. And further, becaufe we obferve With grief of he art, that fit and iniquity abounds, and many fepAr ate from our Congrega- tions \and run head-long into heretical, and foul- damning opini- ons 5 tAnd thofe that do joyn with us in the Presby terial Governmem Governments^ CMinifiers, Elders, and c People, meet Witl$ many difc our agem ents, and may (pofftbly) groW faint ; and weary and negletl iv e cf their duties : Therefore, We have a/fi thought oar [elves obliged fo our Vindication, to adde an Ex- lortation, unto all Mimfters, Elders, and People, Within the bounds of our Province, whether \oyning with us, orfiparating 9omus. The work^( We acknowledge ) is very Weighty, and difficult ; and the times wherein we live, are very peril lous y in which mem are made Offenders for a word ; Provincial Affemblies (as ncW constituted) are new and ft range with us, Weakjn poWer % and of no repute With m any ;fufpe fled by fome,as likely to prove trejudiciall to the Kingdom ; and by others, to the liberty of Congregations. And tie judgments and consciences ofmofl pto* tile, are Jo prepojfejfed With prejudices and felf-intereft, a* that we cannot but ex peel, that this our firlt expreffion of our "elves,??*// meet With much oppofition, and contraditlion. Some will not vouchfafe to read it-fithtr s Will read it, and contemn it; Others will mockjmd feoff 'at it. But our comfort ts,the Te/li- mony of our (fonfeiences. That the grounds efthis our prefent undertaking, are neither pragrnaticalnefs of fpirit, nor to vent ourowntpken in afferfngothers^nor afFecTation of dominati- on over others- y nur to blow the Trumpet to new troubles. But our ends and aymt, herein, fincerety are, That the truths of Chrift may be vindicated, the Government of the Lord Jefus advanced, the power of Godlinefs exalted , the credit of the odly Mkiiftry repaired, the unity of the Spirit gained, and ept in the bond of peace, That our Congregations may be urged, purity of Ordinances promoted , divifions healed, reaches made up , {tumbling blocks removed ; That thofe who itand may be cftablifhed, the weak & feeble Strengthen- ed, the feduced may be converted from the errour of their tfayes,*nd rcpent,to the acknowledgment of the truth ; That anguifhing gifes and graces, may be quickened and increafed; That a through Reformation ( according to our folcmn Co- venant) may be really endeavoured • That no means of cdi~ kation, may by Us benegkcTed- That we may keep our fclves fci vcs pure from the bloud of all men : That the Kingdome of our Lord and Saviour may be iniarged, and God in all things glorified. We confefsy it is hardly pojfible, to Wipe off the dirt caft upon us, butfomeofit wiV neceffarily Ught upon thofe that caft it ; (and it isfitythat they%that unjttftly befmear other should have their ownftlthinefs impartially difc over ed) yet notWithftanding, we have purpofcly avoided, as much as may be> all perfinall re- flections , and have Waved the arfwcring of fame objetlions made 'againft us , left in anfwering to them , we/bould give occafion, to thofe that fee \occafton. And We doubt not (how- ever others may be tranfported Withfaffion , or prejudice) but this endeavour of ours , which fo much concerns the prefervati- on of Religion % Truthfiodlinefs, and Miniftry,from ruin* and de(lrutlion } Wi/l be acceptable, to all 'fiber , and unbyaffed CbrU ftians. We fhall begin with our Vindication, and therein ftr ft affert Church-Goiemment, by Divine Right • and then clear tip the Presbytcriail Government, and Miniftry; andreprefent them unto you, in their native colours ; and afterwards proceed to our E xhorution. The The VINDICATION. HE externall Government and Difcipline of Chrift, (though it be not oecefTary to the being, yet itjis absolutely necefTary to the well- being of a Church: SoneccfTary, as that we cannot but be deeply affc&ed with grief and forrow , when we confidcr how long the through fetling of it hath been delayed, (notwithftanding the Covenant we have taken,with hands lifted up to heaven, to endeavor a reformation in point of Difciplinc ) and cannot but conceive it to be one clr ef reafon of all the miferics that arc now upon us; becaufethofe that have been in Au- thority amongft us, have laboured to build their own houfes,and have fuffered the houfe of God to lye wafte. KKehemiah fate down and wept, and mourned certain days,becaufe the watlofzperufalem was broken down fac Much more htvc we caufe to mourn,that the wall of Zi- on is not yet reared up 5 for as a City wit hut walls , 4 Set without banks, a vineyard without a hedge, fo is a Church without Difcipline \ and he that fhall confider the mul- titude of Herefics and Blafphemics, the abundance of iniquities and abominations, that have crowded into the Church, whilcft this wall hath been unbuilt, and this hed^e unmade; cannot but take up the lamentation of David, though with a little difference, ^HfDAScli baft thou fuffered thy Vineyard to be Without a htdge , fo tljat all ^ jX ^ \ff they which do ptffe bj plnckjoer. The Boar out of the wood doth Wafte it, and the wild 2? e*fts of the field devour it. Return, we be- A fetch feechthee>0 LordofHofts ; lookjown from Heaven, andlehold and vi/it this Vine, and the Vineyard which thy right hand bath j> lantcd , and the branch that than made ft ftrong for thj /elf, &c. And likcwife to pray the prayer of the fame Prophet io .. g another place. Do good w thy good plcafure to Zion y and 2 * JX ' X ' build then the walls of^erufalem. The differences,we confefs,about this wall,arc very many,and fo many, as that it would require a large Vo- lume to treat of them ^ andit cannot be denyed, but thefe differences have been the great apple of flrife for thefe many years : And although it be our defign ( as we have faidj to heal andmake up the breaches of this wofully divided Church,and not to widen and increafe them -, yet notwithftanding, we cannot without preju- dice to the truth, to our felvcs, and to our rcfpe&ive Congregations, bat give the world fome fhort account of wo of intern about Church- Government. There are fome, that although they have taken a Co- venant^ to endeavour the Reformation of the Church in Difciplinc, according to the Word^ yet arc not afraid to fay ; That there is no funicular Church-Government fet down in the Word $ that the Chripan Magip-ate is the Tmnuin of all Church-power, and that to auert a jus dl- vinum of Churchr Government , is defiruftiveto all f oliti- cal Government. Now though this Opinion prevail much mthStdte-Divines^and with Chriftians that ftudy mrldly-folicy , more then Scrip ture ftmplicity •, And though it be likely (if God prevent not) to fwallowup in a fhort time,all other Opinions about Church Govern- went: And though the affertingofa jusdivinum in Church- Difcipline> be with fome men, the only herejie not to be tolerated^ and more hated, then the abomination of defolationfandmg in the holy place, was by the Jews 5 yet notwithftondin&wc hold it our duties, efpecially im tficlc :hefe times,to make it known to all our refpe&ive Con- gregations. i . That Refits Cbrift, as King and Head of bis Churchy fab appointed a particular Government in his Church. 2. That the Christian Magi (Irate ^ is not the original/ of Church- Government. Which two particulars, we (hall endeavour with great brevity and pcrfpicuity, to make 3Ut unto all unprejudiced Chriftians. And firft. i That there is a particular Church-Government by di- vine right : not that we think, that every circumjtance in Church Government is (et down prccifely in the word, or s of divine right in a ftricft fence • But this we fay, That :he [nbstantials andeffentials, arc recorded particularly n the Word by Chrift, the King of his Church,and are inalterable by any State whatfoevcr • And that therir- :umstantial$ arc fet down under generall rulcs,fufficient r or the ordering of them .-, and that thercfore,even they dfo in a large fence may be faid to be of a divine right. >Iowthis we fhallenaeavour to prove by thefe enfu- ingArguments. I . From the f nine fs^andfuffcienc'j of the Holy Scriptures. rhe Apojlle Paul faith, that his firft Epiftlcto Timothy , i*"***!. vas written, To teach htm how to behave himfelf in the houfe ofGod^ which is the Church of the living Godjhe pil- ar and ground of truth. And in his fecond Epiftle he tels x TJm>s# is; That the holy Scriptures are able to make the man of God ^,17. wfettjhroMgblyfurniJheduxto all good works. Now to Pfa, - T ?- 7 - know how to govern the Church , is one of the great vorks that belong to the Miniftcr : And therefore, to ay, that this is not recorded in Scripturc,is to make the loly Scripture a rule defetiivc,andiruffettuallforthe end r or which it was written, and to call: a vcrygrcat reproach xnd dishonour upon it. And furcly, iffomcfubftantiall xuts of Church- Government > arc cxprcft in the B 2 Word Word ( as few will deny ) then ( as we conceive) all of them of necefiity rauft be expreffed,or elfe the Word fllould not be able to attain its end -, which to affirm, is no fmall errour : And for our parts,wc cannot conceive any reafon to induce us to believe , that the Holy Gbojl fhould fet down in the Word, fome of the (ubSantials of Church -G over mem, as binding and unalterable unto the end of the World, and leave other things zsfulftan* tialUs they ^arbitrary and alter abk^ according to the will and pleafure ohhcChriflian Magiflrate. 2. From the excellency if the Kingly Office offefus Chrift % For Chrift$e[us is the only King of his Church 5 governing it not only inwardly, and invifibly , by the working of his Spirit -,but outwardly alfo, andvifibly, as it is a vifible, politicall, and minifteriall body, in *.% Cor.y. which he hath appointed his own proper a Jmbaffa/ors, Eph.4.1 1. b Afftmblies^ c Lawes, d Ordinances , and e Cenfures, to be 6Match.i« . adminiftred in his name,and according to his own way. 2 iam ^ s a *^ n § °^ l ^ [S politicall and minifteriall Church, he 1fa.33.22. breathed on his Difciples 7 andfaid, Receive ye the Holy ^Macth.28. GhoJl,rvhofe fins ye remits tbty are remitted unto thern^ 2 Ccr.i 1 ^ w ^ $ f e fi ns y e retAt *-> thy are retained. As a King of 13. &c. ' this vifible Church, he faid unto his A$oR\cs } A 11 power e 1 Cor . f . ^ given unto me in Heaven, and in Earth •, Go ye therefore^ az^v 1 ' art d tu ch all Nations ^ baptising them in the name of the Match.28. Father, and of the Son,sndofthe Holy Ghofl y teaching them 18,19,20. ^ obferve all things whatfoever I have commanded you - 7 and lo I am with you alrvaf, even unto the end of the rverld. As a King of the fame Church, he gave gifts to men, when . v j j he afcended up to heaven, fome to be Jpoftics, fome Pro- Eph.1.22! phcts^and (me Evangelijls^ and fome Paftors andTeactfers. 1 rim^.if. A s a King,henow fits at Gods right hand, and is made Head over all things to his Church ^ which Churchis called the houfe of Cod ^ and who fbsuld appoint Or- 3 dc& [5] dersfortbc Government of the Houfe, but the Lord of thehoufe f And to lay, that he hath not ordained hour his houfe fhould be governed , is to make the Maftcr lefs faithfullin his own houfe, then his Servant Mofcs^* 1 ^' was 5 which Church is Chrifls Vineyard^chrifls Garden , Cant. \'i6.6. andean we think Chriftfb negligent, as not to appoint** . a hedge to fence his Vineyard, and a wall to preferve p his Garden ? which Church is a fpirituall Republique* And (hall we deny that to Chrijl in the Government of his Kingdome, which we grant unto all Earthly CMo- mrebs t Shall we fay, That Chrift hath ordained no Laws, by which his Kingdome fhall be governed 5 no Cenfifres, by which his rebellious (ubjefts fhall be pu- nched 5 no Officers to difpence thofe cenfures i This is a high defamation to Jefus Chrift,and his Kingly office. 3 . From the immediate , and proper end of Church Go- vernment, which is not only matter of order and decen- cy \ but fpiritual and fupcrnatural, being appointed for the Edification oft he body of Chrijl in grace unto glory&nd more particularly, for the gaining of an offending br o -^ 4#IX ; therunto repentance , and for the faving of his foul in the iMttth. 18.15*. day of the Lordtfefus. Now this is a certain rulc,n^- \ £^**J^ foever hath a fpiritual efficacy , mutt ofnecefsity have a di- b 1 rim. 5. 17. vine originall . humane infi it utions can but produce hu- * j^ ia, * r; mane effects .• And therefore, feeing Church Govern- ^ 7> *. ' ment is dcfigncd for divine and fupernaturall ends, itcAa.6.^6. rauftof neceffity, plead its.originall from God himfelf. fn^g™ 4. We argue from an enumeration of the funftantials d 1 Tn-n.j.z.to of Church-Government. The Word of God declares l^'^f** unto us, That there arc Church-officers , and who x Tim.3.10". they arc, viz. a Paflors and Teachers, b Ruling-Eldtrs, Atf.i j-*,*,j. and' Deacons . And-how they are tobe d qualified fox, **rk£$ % l\. and c externally called wmo their rcfpe&ive Officcs,toge- and 4.14. ther m thcr with all the Minifterial duties in thofe Offices, by them to be performed refpediively 5 as? publike prayer, gkaLiiX 1. c ^ e Mini {fry of the Word, s by reading and h preachings the a a.13. i?. * blelfing of the people in the name of the Lord, k Admi~- h Match.i^. ni p atlon f t h e sacraments, 1 Cenfures and m diftributi- 2 Tim,4.i ,i. on of Alms. The Scripture alfo tells us of a n Churchy Lu k u ^ b *^ M * confiding of no more then can conveniently meet in ^Cor.Vj ^. one place to partake in all the Ordinances of publike ii Matches. Worfhip : and of ° a Church confiding of divers Con- Ma™6.i6. to gregations. The Scripture alfo fpcaks of pSynods^vvith 31. Ecclefiafticall Authority, together with the q fubordi- ? Tfc^io *' nat * on °fth c lefler, to the grcatcr,and appeals thcreun- a Thcff^Ui t0i Nowallthefearethe fubftantials of Church Go- i<- vernment, and arc fufficiently fet down in the Word, ^at.i .if. cg^ s ma yp art iy a pp ear by the quotations in the Mar- 1C0r.jj.and gent, and (hall further appear by what we fhall fayaf- l^y 6i7y terwards. And more then thefe, and fuch as arc neccf- m Aft.i.gj. farily included in thefe 3 are not ("as wc humbly conceive) Aa*' 1 '!'*' ^ft ant ^ a ^ s * n the outward Government of the Rora!ii.8^ S ° Church.Thc reft arc circumftantialls 5 for which Chrift n 1 Cor.14.34 hath given general rules fufficient to dire fthofe things that are voithont the Churchy *s Conftantine *~Etan s he doth not acquire more Authority over the Church of Chrift, then he had before, no morethena heathen hutband converted, doih over his wife, which he married \ when unconverted. A Magiftrate,by becomingChriftian, is better inabled to do fervice to Chrift, and his right is fanned to him j but his Authority is no greater then it ■w# before* 3. Becaufc m 5. Becaufe the power oftheMagiftrate, Preference to the power of the Church , is not privative of the Churches power, but cumulative and additional. For if itwercotherwiie, then the condition of the Church fhould be worfc under a Conftantine^hcn under a Nero- 9 under a chrijlian Magiftrate , then under a Heathen 5 which is contrary to all thofe Scriptures, which tell us what glorious advantages the Church (hould have 3 by the Magiflrates becoming Chriftian • and that the Ma- . fi giftrate ihall bring honour and glory to the new Jeru- \k^C.io t iu falem, and not take away that power that properly be- i&.*o.io. longs to the new Jerufalcm. Rcv.n.i* ; 4. Becaufethac thisaffertion, denyeth an intrinfeczll power to the Church,to preferve it felf in unity jlq purge out fpiritual defilements, and to take care for its own prefervMtion againft Church deHrojingenemies, and ini- quities •, which makes the happineflc of the Church wholly to depend upon the civil Magiftrate^and is con- trary, not only to the nature of the Church, but of all iCor.f.n. othevfocieties, which have a power within thcmlelves , of felj c -prefervation \ and is contrary to the experience of former ages, which tell us, That the Church ofchriji did A b Apoftoih fiourijb more in truth andholineffe, (though not in wealth ufyntMimfin and honours,) whilett itwasundir Heathen per [editing TXfi.t O^fli* Entperours, then afterwards. From the Apofllcs, even x*ra& m Ad*iu unto the dregs of our time, the Church of Chriit, both ggg in its infancy and fuller growth, increafed by perfecuti- c*m*u jh'«t •ns,and w^s crowned by Martyrdoms : But after it had rfr : *^ Chriftian Princes, indeed it was greater in power and T^r*, riches, but leffe in piety, faith Jerome. 5 . Bccaufe that this opinion, That the Magiflraie is the %.^' Fountain of all church-power , derives upon the Ckrifitan bus Iia£i[batt mtt of that power > which the ? ope did f ar ma U, \ ^*[ ,c i C WMffl rnofi unjuflty W tyrannically ufurp over the Churches of zfcfa Ckrifl -, and thereby makes the Chriftian Magi- ftratetobecomca^//>/WP^ 5 andfets up a civil An- tichrifi inftcad ofafpiritual,for one great fart of^nli- chriftianifme confifteth in the Popes making hirafelf to be the Original of all (piritnal jurifdiciion. And thus we have given you a fliort account of the firft opinion-, and wedobefeechyou,in the Name of out Lordfefus Chriji, that you would weigh what wc have faid,in the ballance of the Sandtuary-, & that you would look upon Church- Government, as an Ordi- nance o£God,flowing unto you in the bloud of Chrift, and as part of his Kingly office ; That you would allow of no Church-officers, ox offices, that have not a divine Jlamp upon them , accounting them guilty of a ftiritual Praemunire, that will undertake an office in the Church, ifthere cannot be frewed a Scripture-warrantiox it-, and that you would fubmit unto it for confeience fake. The fecond opinion, is of thofe, that will confefTe a f articular Church Government 6y divine right; but fay, that this is not the Presbyteriall , but the Government commonly called Independent, or Congregational! : the truth is, There are four kinds of Church-Government which lay claim to a jus divinum . The Papal,Prelatical % Independent, and Presbyterial. The firft of them was b^nifhed out of this Kingdom,by King Hen.the 8. The fecond of them,as it was ufed and pra&ifcd in this land, is abjured by our Covenant. The great debate of tbcfe late years, hath been about the Prcshyterial, and h de- pendent Government. And though wc do Hot intend ac this time, to enter yita a large difputc ; yet wc earneft- lyidefire our Brethren, that differ from m only in point ©f Church- Government , to ^confider the woftill mit chiefs* no chiefs, that have come upon the Churches of Chrift in England Joy their dividing,and feparating from us: And j that vvhilcft we have been diluting what is that Govern- ment which Chrift hath appointed in his Wordjhtxc arc a prevailing party rifen up,that will have no Government at all to be found in the Word : whileft we have been fo long debating about the hedge, the wild Beads have got in, and made fpoyl of the Vineyard it felf : Whileft we have been building the wall, others have been p lucking down the houfe : Whileft we have been confulting about the Garment of Chrift, others have taken advantage to deny the Divinity of Chrifl : Whileft we have been fo tedioufly contending about Reforming of churches, Or* dination of Mimfters •, and purity of Ordinances, there are men rifenup, that deny all CMimftry, Ordinances, and churches. And indeed, there is fcarce any fundamen- tal Doftrine in Chriflian Religion, but is now,not only called in queftion, but openly denyed by ibme, oro- ther. And therefore, we do exhort our Brethren^, the name of 'our Lord $t\us chrift , that they would fadly lay to heart the unexpreffible calamities, which arc brought upon oui Churches,by their dividing from us 5 and that they would ftudy, for the time to come, al! wayes oflln/on and Accommodation : And for our parts, we do here profefs to all the World, that we are, have alwayes been, and through the grace of God, fhall ever be willing to ftudy to find out any Scripture way,vhac- in we may unite together with them /or the preservation of the Truths ofj-^m chnft, for the prevention of a tole- ration of Hereftcs and Elajphcmics, and for the healing of the great fcandal that is given to weak Christians y and wicked men, by our unhappy differences and divi(*ons. As for the PrcsbjterUl Government it felf , we may juft- C 2 ly aa.i8.ij. iy fay ofit, as the Jews did upon another occafion, m know that every when it is fpoken againli 5 and chat men deal with it, and Us that profefs it, as the old perfecutors dealt with the Chriftians-, when they put them into Bear -skins ^ and then baited them with dogs ; and as the Aa.&Mon. pyitfs dealt with zfohnHus, when they pinned apaper, with i he picture of red Devils, upon his head, and then ex- po fed him to tie lighter of the peo ( le. Some fay, That it is a lordly. Domineering government • and that if we had our wills, we would lord it over the people of Chrift, more then ever the Prelates did 5 and inftead of one Bi- fhop in a Diocefs, we fhould have many hundreds. O- thers fay, that it is a Tyrannical and cruel government , and if it were once eftablifhed, it would fine and im- prifon all that would not yeeld to it. Others, that we require an Arbitrary power, and challenge an illimited jurifdi&ion. Others,that we have a defign to free our felves from being under the power of the civil Magi- ftrate. Others, that this government doth rob the Congregational Churches of their power and liberty ,_ no leffc then Prelacy did, fb that the Church in remo- ving of Prelacy, changed not Dominium, but Domiwm* Others, that we feek for unity, but negleft purity. O- thers accufe us,that we contend too carneftly for purity, becaufe we will not admit men to the Sacrament,before they give an account to the Minifter and Elders of their fitnefs thereunto. thers accufe us, for ftamping z]m divinum upon our government; and others on the con- trary, declaim againft us, becaufe we do not affert a jus divinum,bm depend upon zjus humamm \ depend more upon an Ordinance of 'Parliament for our eftablifhmenr, then an Ordinance of God, Others exclaim againft us > that we are now become the only troublers oflfrael, and the. the only hinderers of a bleffed and glorious Reformation ; That we axepcflilent fellowes , mowers of fedttion atmng i the people, caufcrs of the firft wsf between King and parliament, and of all the murders and blood-fbed- ings,that have been in the Nation for thefe many years^ That we were the Authors and abettors of that vio- lence that was offered to the Parliament, July 6, \ 647. That the Minifters of London arc Pulpit- Incendiaries y and haveftparated their confecrated lungs, fcr Bellows, to blow up the fire of a fecond War the laft year $ that they were the bringers in of that numerous A 1 my out of Scotland j.o invade the Parliament and Army of England: Others fay, that we are Apoftatized from our princi- ples, and are turned Malignants 5 that we that were once the great Parliament J{fertors,avc now beeome the only Parliam.nt-Oppofers. LafHy, that the Presbyterian OMi - niflers kck their own private eafe and intereft, and not the things of Jcfus Chrift ; That they are notorious hypocrites, Baals PikRs, limbs of Antkhrift. And that the only rcafonwhy they diflikc, and cxpreffe an unfatisfiedneffewith thefe times, and the alterations therein made, is, becaufe they fear, that their great Di- ana of tythes will be pulled down, and that their gains will be leffe, and their pains greater 5 and that they cannot lord it over their people, as they hoped to have done. Thefe are the Bear- skins in which we are put from day to day 5 thefe arc the red Devils that are pinned up- on us,to render our perfons, Mir. and Government odious unto the people. But our comfort is, that thefe accufations are mccr calumnies and (landers, and that there is not the lcaft fhadow of reality or truth in them. And it is an evident token to us , that Gcdhath (one great work for us to do , becaufe hefuffers the red dragon to pouy Cm] pour out fmh floods of reproaches upon us •, and that oux go- v eminent is of Divine Original^ bctaufeit isfo much oppo- fed, and that by all forts of men, and that in contrary ways : fomeoppofingit,becaufe it fecks fo much after puri j ofor^mances- 7 othc\'s^bccauCc it feeksit not enough: fome,becaufe it layeth claim fo much to a jus divinum i Others, hecauje not enough. We well remember, and are therein much comfor- ?^* w ted, what Tertullian faith • That that religion mujl needs called Eng- be good which Nero perfecuted^ and what spMbemius that lands warning, fate learned Pro feffor of Ley den, in his hiftory of the ori- wjf^An hi- g ina ^ and progrefs of the Anabaptifts of Germany, tells ftoricail Nar- us, That when Godraifedup Luther, Melanfihon^ Zuingli- V £ U °£ ^ft^ us * am ] ^ vers ot ^ tr Worthies^ to be the Reformers of his Churchy in Germany ^ l the fame timejhe enemy of mankind raffed up the Anabaptifts, &C ' to be the difturbers of his Church. That Thomas Muntzer their great Antefignanus,When hecould not get Luther to joy n tyith him y but on the contrary was rebuked by him, and earnefily admonijhed not to difturb.the publique peace, &c. He began to rife up, and thunder againfi Luther himfelf ', crying out , that Luther was 04 much in faulty as the Pope of Rome ; that it was true, the Work of reformation Was fomewhat furthered by him, but l-eft ftM in- fetledwith much leaven; yea that Luther was Worfe then the Pepe, for that he had pub lifted only a carnall Go/pel. And afterward?, when Luther, Melanhlhon, Zuinglius, 3uttinger, Metritis, Re- gius, and others, began, by writing, to defend both their own, and thecaufeofthe Church of God, and to wipeoffthe blot that was caft as well upon themfelves as upon the Gofpel, by thefe Anabaptifts •, Muntzer and his confederates were the more enraged againft them, crying out. That Luther, andihtfe of bis party, fa- voured nothing &ut theflejb, vaunting indeed, that they had Cut off fome of the leaves of lAntichnft but the tree, and the roots remai- ned flill untouched. Which muft alfo be cut doWn , and which cut doWn they would. And becauje they could finde nothing in the Written [15] written Word, to defend their errours ^ and the tumults which they raifed, they fly to revelations, and inspirations, &c. Hereupon every Fijh-monger begins to boafl of the fpirit, feign revelations Rafter the example of S torch and (JW 'unt zer ; The Pulpit is open to every Cebler or Tinker. They feoff ed at tl e publique St rmons of the reformed, inveighed againft the Lutherane Faith, as being void of irood Troth, &c. Muntzer, t-he chief e trumpet of thefe iprcars , proclaims openly , that he Was raifed up by the command of God, fur the fHniJbment of tricked Princes, and altering of Po- litick^ government. His ufual fubfeription to his letters tiv*/, Thomas Muntzer, thefervant of Godagainfl the ungodly. What was the fatal end of this Muntzer , and of John Becolaihc Tay- lor of Leyden, and of the reft of tha* crew ; what prodigious opinions they held, he that will, may read them in the forementioned Author. There arc two reafbns have noved us to cite this ftory : Firft, to fhew,7^tf it is mt tnufual with God, when he raifeth up men faithful in their generation to reform his Churchy to give way to the ene- nyofmankind,for the trial of his people, toraife up ome men even amongft the Reformers themfelves, hat by fpreadingof errours and Hercfics, andState- lifturbing opinions, fliould endeavour to obftruft the leformation fo happily begun. Secondly, that in times f Reformatio^ it hath alwayes been the practice of the ing-lcaders ©f Errours and Herefies, to inveigh more itterly , and write more railingly againft the Refor- mers of the Church, and the Reformation by them in- eavoured,then againft the common adverfary , borh f thcmfelves, ofthe Reformers, and of the Reforma- on. And this is our lot and portion at this day. But yet, nowithftanding all this,we hope.that if this esbyt eri all Government ffo much oppofea both by Ma- nants^ani Sectaries $f aU(orts t yizxc once prefented un- our congregations inks true and native colours, it would (i6) would be embraced by all that fear God amongft us -, and that \vc might fay of it,as once it was {aid of So- crates , That all that knew hint^ loved him $ and the reason why an j did not love him^ was only because they did not know him. And welikewife hope, that if we fhall fully anfwerthea^ccufations that are brought againft us, in the bitter and lying pamphlets of this licentious age, that then our perfons alfo (hall (land right in the hearts and confeiences of all that truly fear God within this Kingdomc. Give us leave ; therefore,to undertake theft two things. Firft, To represent the Presbperiall-Government before you, in its true beauty and excellency. Secondly ,70 vindicate our perfons from theflanders and cruell reproaches that are cajl upon them. i . For the Vindication of our Govern wcnt> and therein the undeceiving of our people,who look upon it 5 as it is misreprefented unto them, by thofe that arc enemies unto Us, Them , and the Government, we fhall offer briefly theft enfuin<* particulars. i. That the Presbyterull-Government^ is a Govern- ment that hath been the fruit of the prayers of many thoufands of godly people in England jn Queen EliT^- beth's, and King lames his dayes : There were many knowing Chriftians, and faithfull Minifters,that made it their frequent prayer, that God would reform Eng *By Mr. /Win Difcipline, as he had done in Doftrine $and the agiinft lgl '*' Difcipline then they prayed for, and many a fufferec Archb.ffhit- for,was the Presbyterian 5 as appears by the books writs Mr ' Vdal ten * n t ' 10 ^ ^ a y S * ^^ ft™ w mr * typife ^ at wcrC ) Mr.H/Wr/- that comes Rimming to us in the prayers of fo many thou- ty* m > (and Saints? Mi-.rr^/o ^ though the Presbyterian- Government ( for the practice [I7D practice of it ) be new and ftrange to us in England, yet ic is not new. Firft, To the Churches of Chrift in other Coun- ries : Formoftof thofe places that did thraft out the 'opidi Religion , and Government, did receive in the >roteftant Religion,and Presbyterial Government It not new to the Proteftant Reformed Churches in ranee, Scotland, Netherlands, and Geneva, and divers )thcr places, who have had comfortable experience of his Government, and have enjoyed a great deal of li- erty,vcrity, piety,unity,and profperity under it : And which we defire all our refpe&ive Congregations fe- ioufly to confidcrj therefore it is (as we humbly con- cive) that theframers of our National Covenant did put nthefc words, K^ind the example of the befl Reformed churches, into the firft Article of the Covenant, that hereby they might hint unto us, what that Govern- ncnt was, which is necreft the Word, even that which now pradifed in the beft Reformed Churches. 2. To the Word of 'God '• but is there to be found in all \tfubjlantials of it, as we have briefly fhewed already, nd fome of our own Brethren Ullinifhrsoi this City, ave made to appear at large, in a Book, entituled, The ivine Right of the Presbyierial Government. We fhall xak a little more to three of the foreinenticned Sub- antials of Church-Gcvernment : And (hall prove, 1 . That the Scripture holds forth a Church, confi sling of divers Congregations. 2 . Synods with Ecclefiajlical Authority . 3. Subordination of Congregations unto Synods, together with Appeals thereunto. . That the Scripture holds forth a Church confuting of divers Congregations. Such a Church was D The The Church oftfcrufalem 5 as appears, 1. By the Multitude of Believers, both beforehand after the difperfion(nientioned, Aff.%. 1. )A&.*. ^^^.Atf. 4,4. ^#.5a4.^#.tf.i;7.^#'9. 31. -^#.12.24. Atf.u.to. 2. By the many ^ pottles, and other Preachers in the Church o£$ernfa em : If there were but one Congrega- tion there, each Apoftle preached but feldom , which will not confift with Att.6.2. 3. The diver fity of Languages amongft the Believers % mentioned both in the fecond and ftxt Chapters of the Affs, doth argue more Congregations then one in that Church. All whieh, are fully and largely handled by the Reve- rend K^£§ewbly of Divines ,in a book of theirs,printed by Authority of Parliament. 2. That the Scripture freaks of Synods with Ecclefiaflical Authority , this is evident from ^siti. 15. in whichi Chapter, two things are to be obferved : 1. That the A pottles in that Meeting, did not act as Apo- ttles with infallible authority, but as Elder s, in fuch a way as. makes that tJMeetingi a pattern for ordinary Synods. For the proof of this, we offer thefe reafons. 1 . Becaufe Paul and Barnabas did willingly fubmit to be fent from Antioch to tferujalem, which they needed not have done (one ofthcmatleaft being an Apoflle} nor could have done, had they afted as Apoftles 3 and not as Members, for that time, of the Presbytery of Antioch , A&.15.2. 2 . Becaufe Paul and Barnabas were fent not only to the Apoftlesat ferufalem, but tor the Apoftlcs and Elders, which at that time were not a few (the Believers in -fc- rufalem being many thoufands) which proves,that they fent not unto the Apottksas extraordinary and infallibl Lke>\ i (for then what need the advice of the Eiders f ) but as wife and holy Guides of the Church, who might not only relieve them by fbme wife counfel, but alfo jet a prejident untofuccceding Ages, how ErroursaniDtffen- tions'mthc Church might be removed and healed; as Mr.C0//zg.*3. 3. Becaufe in the Synods the Apoftles did not deter- mine the thing in queftion,by Apostolical Authority fiom immediate revelation, but alfembled together with the Elders to confider of the matter, /M. 1 5 .6. and a Mul- titude of the Brethren together with them, Aft. ij\ 12, 22,23. And there the qucftion was ftated, and debated from Scripture in an ordinary way. Peter proves it by Mr atmH :he rvitnejje of the Spirit to his Miniflry^ in Cornelius MrtfccJfc* Familyv Paul and Barnabas by the like effeft of their Mi- riftry amongft the Gentiles, fames confirmed the fame Dythe teftimony of the Prophets; with which, the vhole Synod being fatisfied, they determine of a judi- cial fentence, and of a way to publifli it by letters and jtieffagcs. 4. Recaufe the Decrees of the Synod are put forth in \hc name, not on/y of the Apojiles, but of the Apeflles and folders, Aci. 1;. 22,23. Att. 16.4. 0^^.21.25. : The fecond thing to be obferved in that Chap?er,is, I That the Apeflles and Elders did put forth ACis of Bale- ^aflicall Authority m that Synod. This appears plainly j;*om AiiA-.i%. to lay no other burden. To bind burdens, i' an aclofthe binding power of tie Keyes. And it appears kcwifefrom ^^.16.4. where mention is made of De- ees ordained by the Apostles & Elders. And it is obferve- lolc, that whercfoevcr Jfyp*, is ufed in the New Tefla* fent^it is put either for Decrees or Laws ^nd fo frequent- I by the Septuagint in the OldTefarnent^ as is abundant- »i D 2 ly ly proved by the Reverend Affembly of Divines, in their antwer to the Rcafons of the Diffenting-Brcthren , a- gainft the inftance of the Church of ferufalem,ipag.66. 3. That the Scripture holds forth a fubordination of Congregations unto Synods, together with Appeals thereunto. To prove this, we will bring two places : . Thefirftis,DwM7.8. to 12. together with 1 Chron.x^A 8,10,11. Out of which two places, compared toge«| ther, we gather thefetwo conclufions: 1 . That the zfews hadttvofupream judicatories intern- \ falem -, the one Eeclefiaftcall, for the matters of the Lord-, the other civilly for the matters of the King.lHs appears by Deut. 1 7. ver.8. where we have a diftin&ion of cauH fes ; fome for enficall between blood and bloody belonging to the civilrfudtcatory-fomc ceremonial,between ftroak, ! and ftroak-, that is,(as not only Hierome,bm the Ghaldy and Scptuagint read the words , and as appears by the 1 frequent ufe of the word in that {cn(c,Levit. 1 3. and elfe- ; where J between leprofic, and leprofie, belonging to the cognizance of the Ecclefiaftical Judicatory. And in the 1 2 vcrfc, thefe two Judicatories arc diftinguiOied, by the disjundrvc Or • And the man that wiUdofrefump* tuoufly, and mH not hearken unto the Priefi, (that ftand* cthto minifter before the Lord thy God,) or unto the zfudge,&c. This further appears, by 2 Chr.ig^io,! 1. In which we have clear mention •, firft of two forts of Judges* the Levites and Priefls, andchiefofthe Fathers, verf. 8. fccondly,oftwo forts of caufes, fome (firituak and Ecclejiafiicall, called the judgment of the Lord, ver. 8. and the matters of the Lord, ver. n . others civiB, as be* twtenhUod and blood, vcr.io. And thirdly, of two Pnfi- dents •, Amariah the chief Priefijn all matters of the Lord*, and Zebadiah the Ruler of the houfeoffodah, in all the matters miters efthe King. And this diftin&ion betwccnthc ci- vil and Ecclefiaftical Judicatory^ the opinion of many Orthodox &learned Authors, which arc cited by Mr. GcUfpy, ^jmrrodblofTom.cap^. pag. 8. where this condition is«largely and learnedly debated & aflerted, 2, That there Was afubordinaiion in the Jenifh Churchy of the {Synagogues , in all hard and difficult controverfies, and in all the \matters of the Lord, unto the Eccleftaflical Judicatory at Jerufa- 'lem, and appeals thereunto ; this appears evidently, T> em. 1 7 .8,9. 2 Chron. 19.8,10. Now that this Subordination, together with appeals, did not belong to the JeW^iJh Church, as Jevijb op.ly,but as it was an Ec- cleftaftical Republique, is evident* For though the high 7'rieJ?> lamongft the Jews,was a type ofChriftyzx. thefe gradual Judica- tories, wherein the aggrieved party did appeal, from the leffer to \the greater ; (that agatnfi the very light of nature^ he adverfe far* \ty wight not be thefole Judge and party too, in his owncaufe) were v.n in any kind ceremonial or ty pic all. Appeals, (faith Dr. Whitaker,) they are of divine and {natural light \and certainly very neceffary in every necejpty, becaufe of the iniquity and ignorance of fudges , Whit. Contr.4. de Romano Pontific.lib.4. cap. 2. And gene- rally, all Protejfant Writers againft appeals to the Popc 5 acknowledge yet, their ncceffaryufcfulncfs to a Synod. So did that renowned Martyr Cranmer , the form of whofe appeal to a Council,three feveral times urged by him, with much inftancc, we have recorded by Mr, Foxe at large, Ads and Monuments. And indeed, if the benefit of appeals, and confutation of Chwches foould not be as free to us,as to the^irj,how much more defective & improvident were the Go (pel, then the Liw, contrary to all ancient Prophefies ofCofpel-Com- munion t How were our Saviour King of Peace and Righ- teoufneffe, (hould he have ordained now under the Gofpcl (fucha government 5 as by making Parties file Judges, were were neither righteous^ nor ptecedle ? what fitdaicaZ type fir ceremony , can there be in this communion and mutual afliftance in government which God (as by his Word,fo) by the very light of nature 5 teacheth all foci- cties whatfocver, whether Common- Wealth, Armies, Univerfities, or Navies i &c. as learnedly Mr. Hcrlefm his Independency, &e. The fecond place is Match. 18.15,16,17,18, which text, by a "parity ofreafon, proves 2, fub ordination of Congregations unto Sy- nods, For there is the fame relation between Churrh and Churchy as between brother and brother ;and if a brother offend ing,is/#£- ordinate unto a particular Congregation ; then by a like reafon, an offending (Congregation is fubordinate unto great er Affemllies, And the reafon of it is, becaufe the grounds, reafons, and ends of fubordination* are the fame in both. That Godmight be glorified, the offendor Jbamed, humbled, reduced, and fin not fufferedto refi upon him. That others may be prefervedfrom contagion, and made, to fear, Thatfcandal and pollution of the Ordinances, may I e pre* ■ vented, or removed. All which argue as ftrongly and fully for fubordination of an offending Congregation tofuperiour and greater Affemblies,as of an offending brother to a particularCongregationi And the truth is, whofoever denyes the fubordination of a Con- gregation unto a Synod , together with appeals thereunto ,doth in plain tearms affirm thefe three thi igs, I. That the government ofChrifi in his Church under the NtVv Tefiament, is a Government directly contrary to the very light of nature.making the fame men parties ^andfina ill 'judges iu their o^n caufe. 2» That the Government of the Church in the Old Tefiament, yeas more equal andjufl, then under the New. 3. That fefus (fhr ift hath in his Government appointed no ef- fectual remedy to heal the fcandals of an offending Congregation, or at leafi, a mote effectual remedy toredrejfe an offending Br other %t then an offending Congregation. All which are great derogations, and difparagetnents to the Kingly Office and Government oflefus Chrifi- And thus we have fhewed that the Presbyterial Go- vernment is not new to the Word of God,as fome falfly objeft. We proceed to juftifie it in other particulars. 3 '. The . 3. The Presbyterial Government challenged no power ever mens Mies oreflates. It medleth not in civil affairs, or with infli&lng civil mulfts, or corporal punifhments. It is a government purely Jpiritua/l, difpenfing the Keyes ofthcKingdomofheaven^notoFcanh-j and how then can it be cruel and tyrannical, in fineing and imprifon- ing mens perfons, as wasob;e<5icd i 4. It is not a Government that hath Lor&jhips and great Revenues annexed to it, as the Prelatical had. It is not gainful and profitable ', but burdenfome and troublesome: What dp the ruling Elders gain by their office, but re- proach and contempt i And is not the condition of the teaching Elder vvorfe, in regard of maintenance, fince he ingaged in this difcipline, then cverit was ? This is 1 government that hath no outward advantages to in- duce men to accept of it. His confeience^ and (aswc wpc)pure confeience, that ingageth any in it, and there- c orc it is , that it hath fo few friends , becaufe then arefo r ew that are truly confeientious. 5. It is not a Domineering Hierarchic all magifteriall Government ^ thdt lords it over peoples consciences ^requiring \uhjeftion to the decrees of it^ with blind andjlavijh obedi- nce. But it is a Stervardfhtp, a UWintJlry, a painful and aboriousfcrvice. We fay, fhat all the determinati- >ns , even of Nationall Synods , are to be obeyed no urther, then they agree with the Word of G od. And hat a Synod is fadix judicandus. That Congregate ns arc to examine with the judgment of difcrction, /hat isferxto them from Synods. There is no more Mi e nee required to the Decrees of a Nationall Synod ', then h Independents claim to the decrees of a particular Con- gregation. \ 6, It is not an Arbitrary illimited Government , but^ founded and limited : i. By the Word of God * for in this Government , every thing is to be adminiftred accor- . dthg to the pattern in the Mount, We dcfire none to follow, but where the Word gotth before. 2. By the civill Magiftrate , in regard of the cxercife of it. For we acknowledg our felves (as we have faidj accounta- ble to the civill Magiftrate, to punifli us with civil mul&s, if we abufe our power. 7. It is not a Government, that doth rob and (]>oyl parti* cular Congregations of their juft power and priviledges>but helps and lengthens them. For it is not fas the Prelati- cal was ) extrinfecall to the fevcrall Congregations •, ( which had no vote in the government, nor confent to it,but were fufferers only of it,and under it: ) Neither doth it affumc to it felf the (ole power of Ordination and ]urifditfion : (as the Prelatical likewife did, and in this, was lordly and tyrannical over all particular Congre- gations in each Dioccfs : ) But it is intrinfecallto the Con* gr*£4f/0#,confifting of the Paftors and Elders of every Congregation , governing one another by their ownj Officers : For we hold (which few of ourAdverlaries will underftand or confider) That all Congregations art i equal. No one Congregation over another. That all Minifiers are equatl, No one Minifter, by divine right over another. We hold no Mother -Church, on which all othe 1 Churches flioulct depend. ButourGovernment ; fofa] asitis diftin&from the Congregational,confifteth ofrf/l wrs Sifter -Churches, combined by mutuallconfent , andgA That which WMKg 0}K Mother in matters of mutuall concernmeml concerns by the common agreement of Paftors and Elders 9 accordinj all 'Tcd be to x ^ at Golden Rule, guod mones tangit,ab omnibti b y a aii gC traciari debet. Ib the PresBy tcrial G overnmCnt e veil 1 Coil - Efd Congregation hath a voy ce, by the Paftors and Eldc rs thereof, and Co is governed by a power intrinfecal! to it (Of, which carfnot w its own n&ture be tyrannical!. Thoug h there is no power in the world fo juft,but by abufc may prove tyrannicall. To ililiftrate this by a Hmile. The Presbyterial government is like the government of the City by the Common-coimcell, wherein there are Common-Counceli-men ftnt from * every Ward, tojudg and determine of matters, that concern the good of the \vhole Cicy ; which certainly m its o\Vn nature , cannot be pre* judical to theftverall Wards, but ever] helpfull and commodious*, whereas the i'rehtical-Goveinment , Was \tift as if the City fhould be governed by a High-CommilTion chofen of Forreioers ; \and the Independent-Government is jufi a: if every Ward \ fhould undertake to gov emit f elf divided from one nnothcr , and -\, not at all to be Under the poVecr and authority of the Comraon- \ councell. Adde befides this, the Presbytertall-Governwent doth •give unto people of particular Congregations all that is by Chrift left them. For, i. We allow unto every Congregation a particular Eldcrfhip,whcro it may be had. 2. We impofc upon no Congregation a Miniftec |againfl: whom they cangivc a rationall difTcnt. 3. We allow the Congregationall Elderfhip tojudg in all matters which concern that particular Church 5 and to keep from the Sacrament of the Lords Supper, all thofc whom they finde to be ignorant or fcandalous. 4. In the great Cenfure of Excommunication, we fay, That it ought not to be executed agunft theconfentof that particular Congregation, to which the party to be ex- ^communicated belongs. And in all other matters of im- portance, the Presbyterian- Government hath great re- Ppcft to that Congregation which is particularly con- cerned therein. And therefore,it is fo far from robbin * , E tbfic C«i3 that it is a great Pillar to uphold andfupport Congregatio- nal Government - y as for example : i. When a particular Congregation is deftitute of a Minifter, then the Ncighbour-Minifters of the Claflis help what in them lies to make up that defett, by fend- ing fupply in the mean time, and afterwards by joyn- ing in the ordination of another. 2. When there is an inefficient El derfhip, then the Claffical Presbytery contributes light and ftrength. 3. When anElderfliip proves Heretical, then the Claffical Presbytery helps to convince them of their Herefies, which the people are not able ordinarily ta do 3 and thereby to prefcrve the Congregation from fpi- ritual contagion. 4 C When any member is wronged by the Elderfliip, the Claffis, or Synod,contributcs ayd and relief,as will appear further in the next particular. 8. The Presbyteriai-Government^/p/^/r^w^/^ tyrannical, ast^at it is the greatejl remedy again f} Church- tyranny^ becaufeit is as a city of refuge for allthofe that are opprejjedin their particular Congregations^ to fly unto. For underjthe Congregational-Government, when a bro- ther is (as he conceives) wronged by the major part of the Church of which he is a member, he is for ever lock't up,and hath no authoritative way to relieve him- felf. (Indeed, he hath moral wayes, by advice and counfel, which are altogether inefficient $) But the Presbyterian-Qovernmcnt is a Zoar^nd an Ark for the wronged party to fly unto, from the Particular Con- gregation, to a Claffical, Provincial!, or National AC- fembly. Give us leave to fhew you the difference by this example : Suppofc in the civil Government every Corporation fhould plead a power independent from a VAtlU- [27] Parliament^ and challenge to be unaccountable, would not this make as many Parliaments 5 as Corporations t And if any member fhould be wronged by cite major , part of the Corporation to which he belongs, were he , not left without remedy i And if thefc Corporations | fhould cry down the Parliaments power over them as tyrannical, would it not be faid, that this is therefore only done, that they themfelves might become petty Tyrants < So is it here; IhzCongregationall Government is a Spiritual, Ccrpo- ration, independent from all other Ecclefiafticatl K^iflein+ blits in point of church-power. As the Pope claims a power over all Church- Aftemblies^ fo this claims an ex- emption from the power of all church- J (femb/ies, and cryeth down all ClafficalyProvinciall^or: Na'ionatf-4(fem~ blies with power, as tyrannical $ but is not this , that in the mean time it may become abfblute^ and as it were a petty Tyranny < There are in the Congregational Government thefc fix great defe&s, befides many others which we could aamc. i. There is (as hath been faid) no authoritative w*j to 'dieve a Brother oppreffed by the major part of his Congrtga- ion, which granted , would make the Government of thrift in the Nem Tejlawent^ to be inferiour to the tfew- ' Gavtmment , in which they had the liberty of Ap- als. And alfo to be againft the light of right reafin y making the fame men to be parties and judges in cirowncaufe,(ashath been formerl) frcwed.) 2. There is no author native way cq heal the major part fa Congregation, when it falls into fundamental er- :purs, which is a great difparagement to the Govern- ment of Jeius Chnii, and reflects deeply Hpon the wil- E 2 dome [18] dome and care of the great King of his Church. For it makes Chrifl to provide a more ifftcatiom remedy to cure an erring member y {to wit^by the great Ordinance of cxcommu- meat ion,) then an erring Church. 3. There is no-Authoritative way to keep out plurali- ties of Religions. . For if the whole power of Church- Government be in the Congregation- Independently , then let a Congregation fee up what Religion they think fit, | there is no Authoritative Church-remedy left to hinder them.: 4. There is no Authoritative way for unity and uniform mityin Church-admini(lr.ations^ which doth inevitably lay {tumbling blocks before weak Chriftians D and holds theminfufpence, not knowing to what Congregation to joyn 5 becaufe they fee fuch different wayes of adnai? niftration of Ordinances. 5 . T he re is no relief when a Congregation is dettitul& of a Minifies inpoint of Ordination \ but the fucceeding Miniftcr is left to be examined and ordained by the people of the Congregation that, chofe him.) And fo alfj wherca Congregation becomes her^ticall 3 and in other fuch cafes. , 6 . If any of their Mini Hers preach out of their o^n Con* gregations, hepreachethonlyas a gifted brother 5 neithei can he> (as we conceive) sccprding to their own Princi- ple^ adtriinifterrhc.Sacraments out of his own Con gregation 3 or perform any other ad of office. Althougl wchelicvefbmeofthemdofoj contrary to their owr principles herein. 9. That the PresbyteriaU Government is a Govtrnmet that tends not at all to the deflrutlion of any, but for the goo and edification of all. 1 here arc three chief ends of th Government. 1 . 1 . To keep the Churches ofchriji m unit) amongfl them- [elves. * 2. To keep them in purity andholinefjc \ it is Chrifts Fan, to purge his floor • and his Beefom to Jwap out of his houfe every thing that offends. 3 . To keep them in verity, it is Chrifts Weeding- hook 4$ weed out herefies • and therefore King fames ( though »no great friend to this Government) would often fay , that it was Malleus hareticorum,z Hammer to beat down Herefie s : And we find, that whercfoever it is fet up in ftrength, there the Churches arc kept in unity, verity, Jand purity 5 and that (which is very obferveable)where s'this Government hath once got poffeflion, it hath for ^ ever after kept out Popery and all Popifh Innovations. - The Prclatical Government with all its Lordfhips and Revenues annexed, as it was managed of lace years in t England, was an in-let to Popery, and it had tantum- l non brought it in. But wherefoever the Presbyterian-Go- ic vcrnment isfetled, there Popery, root and branch, is plucked tup and destroyed, and that without any hope of recovery. 1 Butitwillbeobjefted, that notwithstanding all that objeff. hath been faid to render the Prcsbyterial Government * amiable and acceptable \ yet there arc two great Moun- tains which do lye in the way which do hinder, and(as iifomc fay) will for ever hinder people from fubmitting ftvmtoit: The one is, $ 1 . Becaufe it fet s up a new officer in the Church, which viv ameer humane Creature, having no authority from the Word of God, nor was ever heard of in the Church of dChrift|CilIC4/i;/ystimc,&that is the LAY-ELDER. 2. Becaufe it requireth all, of all forts, to come to the Mi- hiftcr and thefe Lay- Idders to be examined, before they can ?e admitted to the Sacrament of the Lords Supper. Wc Do] Jnfmr* We qwnot deny , but chat thefc two obje&ions are great Remoras to the Government , and do h inder the general receiving of it, and therefore we fliall be a little the larger in anfwering of them. For the firfl of them, we do here freely confefle, that if we were of opinion, as fome are, that the Ruling-El- der hath no foundation in the Word of God, but" is a meer humane Ordinance brought into the Church only in a prudential way ; w T e fhould heartily defire the utter abolition of him : For we are not ignorant,that the Ru- ling Prelate was brought into the Church upon the fameaccount,for the avoiding of Scbifm and Divifion , and afterwards proved the great Author and Eomenter of Schifm and Divifion. And if we fhould decline the Ruling Prelate, and take in the Ruling Elder upon the fame prudential grounds^ were juft with God to make himasmifchievousto the Church, as evcrtji.s Ruling Prelate was : And therefore let us confider what may be faid out of the Word of God, for the juftification of this fb much decryed officer : Yetfirft we cannot but take notice that the name of Lty Elder was affixed to this Officer by way of reproach and icorn, by the ad- versaries of him,and that it ought not to be continued. Heb.i3.i7,M. For though it be evident by Scripture , that there is a great difference betwkt the Mimftry ufua!ly called the Clergy 3 and the people commonly called the Laity : yet itsalfoas manifeft, that the Scripture diflingu fheth them not by the names of Clergy and Laity^forasrruch as all Gods people are therein faled the Lords Clergy, i Pet. ? 3. or Inhexitance,and the lord is called their Inhoiitance. And when perfons are duly chofetvfiom amongftthe people to be Governours in the Church , as fuch 5 they are no longer Lay-mcn,but Ecclefiaftical perfons. Atficl therefore B*3 therefore' we profefs a diflike of the name Lay-Elder , and conceive tbey ought to be called either governours inthcChurch, i Cor.i i. 2j.or Ruling- Elders as 1 Tim. 5.17. not becaufe their Office is to rule alone ( for the Teaching- Elder is a Ruler alfo, #^.13.17. 1 Thejf.?. X m f/^ 12.) but becaufe their Office is only to rule. Now /*£ ^ concerning thefe Ruling-Elders, we confefs, that they are Officers fomewhat new and ftranse to the Church of England • yet not new nor ftrange to the Word of God , nor to the Primitive times, nor (as all know) to the Reformed churches. Firft, they are not nerv nor ftrange to the Word of God, neither in the OldTeflament,nor in tlx Nerv. The Jews in the oldTestamtnt^had two forts of Elders - 7 Elders of the Priefts^nd Elders of the people*, fuitable to our teaching and Ruling- Elder; , as appears, 5^. 19. 1. And thefe El- ders of the people did fit and vote with the Prieftsand Levites in all their Ecclefiafticall Confiftories,and that by divine appointment. That they were constituent members ofthe great Sanhedrim, appears, 2 Chron.ip.S. where we rcade, Thatfome ofthe chufrfthe Fathers were \oynedvoith the Priefts, to judge in the metiers ofthe Lord. And howfoever, many things amorg the Jews after the captivity,did decline to difbrder and confufion •, yet wc finde even in the dayes of Chrift, and his Apoftles, That the Elders of the people ftill flue and voyced in the Councell with the Priefts, according to the ancient form, as is clear from Matth.26. 57,59- Matth.2j.i,i2. Maith,\6.n. Matth.11.23. Mar. 14. 43. Luk.22. 66. and Sara eta hjmfelf, who difputeth fo much againft Ruling zfrifrvr/grofc Elder s^cknowlcdgeth thus much: I finde indeed, (faith Mmft£v«ng. he) Eldtrsinthe ^ffemblyof the Prie&s of the old Syna- »M*MW gogue^bich were not PrieJts, andtbeir (ujfr ages and au- thority. [3*3 thmtf in all Judgment severe equal with the fuffrtg's of the Priefis. But he adds ; That thefc Elders of the people were civill Magistrates • which is a poor fliift, dircftly againft many Scriptures , whicb contradiftinguifii thefe Elders from the civil Magijlrate • as appears ; Jc7.%.<>. *fndg.$.i4.Dtut.5. 13. 7^.8.55. iKiflg.io.\$. E^ra ic.u;. And though it were poflible,that ibme of them might be civill Magiftrates,as fome Elders smongft Us, are Juftices of the Peace : Yet they did not fit under that capacity, in the Ecclefiaftical Sanhcdrimjdut as Ec- clcfiafhcal Elders. And that the Jews alfo had Elders of the people, fitting and voting in their inferiour Confiftories, appears (as we humbly conceive) from Aft. 15. 15. J&sijt. 8,17. Mar. ?. 22. In which places , we read of the Rulers of the Synagogue , who were neither Priefts norLevkes, and yet were Rulers in Church- matters, and had power, together with the Priefts , of caffeg men out of the Synagogue, and of ordering Syna- gogue- worfhip, Joh. 12. 42. Aft. 13. it. Now this Affociation of the Elders of the people^ with the Frieft^ in the Jewish Church-Government , was by di- vine appointment^ for Mofes firft inftituted it, and after- wards tfehofaphat rcftored it, according as they were diredted by Cod, Num. 11. 16. iChron. ip,8. And it did belong to the ftmjh Church, not as it was Jewifh, but as it was a Church, and therefore belongeth to the Chriftian Church, as well as Je wifh. I$r whatsoever agreeth to a Church ,a$ a Church • agreeth to every Church. 1 here was nothing Judaical or typical in this inftitu- tion, but it was founded upon the light of nature, and right reafon , which is alike in all ages. But leaving the Old Teftament, let us confider what may [333 may fee faid for the divine right of the Ruling-Elder, ofit of the New Teftamert. For this purpofc, we have al- ready produced three places 5 which we (hall now briefly open 3 and Ore w how the Ruling Elder is proved out of them. The places are, 1 Cor. 11. 28. Rom. n. 7,8.1 77m.5. 17. Thefirfl; place is, 1 Ccr. 12. 18. ^And God hath fet fome in the Church , firfl, %^dfe flies * fecondartly , Pro- phets \ thirdly , teachers-, After that, Miracles-, then gifts ef healtngy helps, governments, diver f ties of tongues* Where we have an enumeration of fimdry Officers of the Church 5 and amongft others, there are Helps,Go~ C*t™*'m fxm vernments. By Help, are meant Beacons-, (as not only ^{^\ v J r - our Reformed Divines, but Lhryfcftome, and Ejlius, and xi.Efrusuvom others obferve,) and by Governments, are meant the Rh- x Cor.i*.t* % ling- Elder which that it may the better appear, we will propound, and prove theft i'u things. 1 . That by Governments, arc meant men exerciftng Government^ the Abttrott put for the Concrete. The in- tent of the Apcflle, is not to fpeak of offices diftinft from perfons, but of per fens exerctftng offices. This appears firft, by the beginning of the verfe, God bath fet fome in his Church ; this relates to perfons,not unte offices. Se- condly, by the 29. and 30. verfes , where the Apoftle fpcaks concretively, of thofc things which he had fpoken be fore abBr actively . Are all workers of miracles ? have dl the gifts of healing? do all (peak with tongnes^&cc ? and Li- ^ v^ fb by confequence, Are all helpers, arcallGovcrnours ? » . • And therefore it is, that the Syriack inftead of helps, Go- ^t^^o vernments, reads it helpers, Governors. WV1 JJ3T 2. That the Governonr here meant, rauft needs be ^MQTD* ^Church Governour • for it is exprefly faid , that he is fcatcd in the Churchy and therefore the civil Magiftratc F ki cannot [50 cannot be meant by this Governour, as fome would have it -, partly, becaufe this is quite befides the whole intent and fcope of the Chapter, treating raeerly upon Jpiritua/l Church-matters, not at all of fecular civil mat- ters ^ and partly, becaufe the Magiftrate, as fuch 5 is not placed by God in the Church y but in the Common-Wealth: and partly, becaufe the Apoftle ' writes of fuch Gover- nours, that had at that time adhial cxiftence in the Church 5 and neither then , nor divers hundred years after, were there any Chriflian CMagiflrates. 3. That this Church-Governeur is feated by God in his Church j It is a plant of Gods orvnpUnting,and therefore fhall ftand firme, maugre all oppoficion. For it is ex- prefly faid, God hath [et fome in his chunh, frjl ApoHles, &c. then helps, then Governments. 4. That this Church- Governour thus feated by God in his Churches not only zChurch'memberJdut&Church- Qjficer. For though it be a queftion amongft the learn- ed, whether fome of the pcrfbns here named ,as the work- ers of miracles, and thofe that had the gift of healing,and ffttngucsfNm feated by God 3 as officers in theChurch, and not rather, only as eminent members indued with thefe eminent gifts 5 yet it is moft certain, that whofb- cver is feated by God in his Church,as a Church-Gover^ mur, muft needs be a Church off icer h for the nature of the gift, doth ncceflarily imply an office. The Greek B/£sppiiw. wor j f or Governments, is a metaphor from Pilots , or Ship-mafters, governing their fhips^ (hence the Matter of a (hip is called Kvfapmm> a Governour, ^^3.4.) and it notes fuch officers,as fit at the ftern of the vcflcl of the f Church, to govern and guide it in fpirituals, according to the will and mind of Chrift, which is the dircft office of our Ruling- Elder.. j. This Up j. This Church- Govcrnour thus feated by God in his Church as a Church-officer, is an ordinary andper- petuaH officer in his Church. Indeed, here is mention made of Officers extraordinary, as Apoftlcs, Prophets; and of gifts extraordinary, as the gift of miracles, heal- ing, and of tongues i but here is alfb mention made of ordinary Officers, perpetually to abide, as Teachers, Helpers,znd the Church-Governour^or Ruling-Elder. And that this Officer is ordinary and perpetual , appears from the perpetual neceffity of him in the Chuich^ fora Church without government, is as a (hip without a Pi- lot, as a Kingdom without a Magiftrate, and a world without a Sun. 6. That this Church-Govcrnour thus fcated by God in his Churches a perpetual Officer,is an officer contra- difiinguijhedm the Text from the Apoftlcs, Prophets, Teachers, and all other Lfficcrs in the Church. This appears-, r. By the Apoftlcs manner of expreffing thefc officers in an enumerative form $ Eirjl, <^dfo&les ; Socondanly, Prof bets -, Thirdly Ttacbtrs; i^Jftcrthat, miracles, then gifts of healing, Sec. 2. By the recapitu- lation, verf. 19, fo. Are all Apo(lles f Are aU Prophets ? Are all Teachers f Jre all workers of miracles? &c. 3. By the fcope of the whole Chapter , which is to fct down different gifts and offices in different fubjc&s 5 It is faid i yc\\%,9. To one is pven by the Spirit, the wordoftvifdomtfo another, the rv r I of knowledglby the fame S fir it -to another \ faith, &c. And for this purpofe, the Apoftlcdraweth a fimile from the members of mans body : As there arc different members in mans body, and every member hath its different office , and every member (lands in need one of another 5 the Eye cannot fay to ih#+Iand, I have no need of thee 5 nor agaio^thc head to the foot, F 2 ~ I have I have no need of thce,&c. So it is in the Church mi- nifterial, which is the body of Chrifr. God hath fct dif- ferent Officers in his Church • fome ordinary and pcr- pctual-, fome extraordinary and temporary : And thefe different Officers have different Offices, fome to teach, others to diftribute to the poor Saints , others to go- vern. Arc all Teachers ? are all Deacons i are all Church-Governours f and thefc have all need one of another. The Teacher cannot fay to the Deacon,! have- no need of thee $ nor to the Church- GovernourJ have no need of thee : But if all thefe Offices were in the Pa- ftor alone,and only,then might he truly fay to the Dea- con and Ruling-Elder,I have no need of thee. But now God hath fo fct the members in his body which is his Church, that every member ftands in need one of ano- ther help and fupport. object. If ^ be obje&ed,that the Apoftles had all thefe offices and gifts here mentioned,emincntly fcatcd in them j foe they were Prophets, Teachers, Workers of Miracles 5 and therefore why may not all thefc be underftood of one and the fame perfon ? 'Anfw. Though it be truc,that the Apoftles had eminently all thefe ^ yet it is as true, that there arc many here named, which had but one of thefe gifts formally feated in them : And it is alfa apparent, that fome of the pcrfons here named were diftindi Officers in the Church, as the Prophet, and the Teacher. Though the Apoftles were Prophets and Teachers, yet the Prophet & the Teach- er were Officers diftindt from the Apoftles-, and by a parity of Reafon,ib were the Governors from the Apo- ftle, Prophet, and Teacher 5 the fcope of the A poftle being (as hath been (aid) to fet out diftinft Offices in di- ftinft Officers : are all Apoftles ? are all Prophets ? are "~ ~ all all Teachers < The fum of what wc have faid from this Scripture, then, is this, That God hath fated (ornemtn i* hi* Church which have a gift and office to govern fokich arc neither Apoftles^Prophets^Teachers^nor Pafters ; and there- fere they ate Ruling- Elders j which is the Officer which we are enquiring after. Now this Interpretation which we have given,is not only the interpretation of Reformed Divines, both Lu- therane atdCalvinifts, but of the ancient Fathers > and even the Papifts themfelves, as appears by the quotati- ons in the Margenr. G«k»du& de Thcfecondtcxtis>2tow. liltfifr Having the* gift. **jj differing according to the grace giver, whether Propirjie^et v iu.« . uspropheCie according to the proportion of Faith \ or Mini- P.Marcyr.i* n r f ~r-a- It J I Iocum.Rcl*!* ftry^ let w wait on our OHimftrwg ; or be that teachetb^ on locm pi lcaaH . teaching ; or he that exhorteth, on exhortation. He thatgi- mf^im. Ara- veth^ let him do it with [implicit]. He that rnleth^ with cli- f£'J'- ligence. He that fheweth mercy ^with cheer fu ! nefs. In which sal words,wc have a pcrfeft enumeration of all the ordina- ™*> s y'"''° ry Offices ofthe Church, Thcfc offices are reduced, SJ^Jtp [ firft, to two general heads, Prophefte and Miniftry, and cos qui are therefore fct down in the Atfiralt. By Prophefte is J*J meant the faculty of right undemanding, interpreting , in . and expoundiite the Scriptures. Miniftry comprehends ' 7/ ; £ ' all other imploymcnts in the Church. Then thefe ge nerals arc fubdivided into the fpecial offices contained under them,and arc therefore put down in the concrete. Under Prophefte are contained, i . Ue th'ttcacheih^hj is,the Doctor or Teacher. 2 . He that exhorteth^ i.#.th< Paftor. Under Miniftry arc comprized, 1. He that -• fun; Prcsbyrcri,duplicihonoicd:gniIubcrm:ur J$>u! una cum V&Qore dclibaabattt jt Sctfffia r/rw, c wybe vit*( :.nt % [3« W#, that is, the Deacon. 2. He that ruleth, that is, the Eftiusm Rom. Ruling Elder. 3. He that Jheweih mercy, which* Office ItiamZ/parL P c "ained unto them,who in thofe days had care of the fpeciakquod* fick : So that in thefe words, we have the Ruling-Elder damckaafma plainly fee down, and ^/rrf-diftineuifhed from the mficari i & mi teaching and exhorting Elder (as appears by the diltnbu- ferm dxatur iis tive particles, 41t JMitkcop, im vctp'Ka^Zv, Whether he that Turanismlfl cachet h j ftf&tffer fc that exhort eth -.Whether he that ru- tisypotiftmum /#£, &c.) And here likewife we have the divine infti- S8T** tution of chc Ru!in g' Eldcr,for fo the words hold forth. prtebelob/equia; Having then gifts differing according to the grace that is wtut etiamho- gi vcn m i us . and thus alfo in the third verfe, according twmswtfen- ** G°dbath dealt to every man,8cc. This officer is the gift fus hvtdqua* of Gods free grace to the Church, for the good of it. tfait*^ A S ainft this E x P ofitio " oi the Text,it is obje&ed by # thofe that oppofe the divine right of the Ruling-Elder, * a that the Apoftle (peaks ,m thefe words, not of feveral ^offices in feveral pcrfbns, but of feverall Gifts in one and the fame perfon \ for he faith, having then Gift* dif- fering according. Sec. Butweanfwer: 1. That the word Gift is often in Scripture taken for office 3 as Epb.4 8, 1 r . When he a fc ended en high, he led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men-, and v.11. He fheweth what thefe gifts were , feme to be Apofles , [one Evangelifls,&c. 2. That the Apoftle in the Prctafis fpcaks not of feve- rall Gifts, but of feverall Offices , and thefe not in the fame, but in feveral members , v. a.. As we have many members in^ubody , and all members have not the fame office. And therefore thc^wfc/kmuftalfo be under- flood not only of feverall gifts, but of feverall Off.ces, and thefe in feveral fnbjecis.knd this further appears by the very fimilitude which the Apoftle here ufcth,which is Zi9l is the fame heufed, i Cor. n. from the body natural, wherein there are many diftinft members, and every member hath its diftincl Office 5 and fo it is in the Church of Chrift. 3. Thefc gifts here mentioned, and the waiting upon them, do ncccflarily imply an Office in whomfoever they are 5 and therefore they arc fet down emphatically with an Article, H/b JiJuewv -a^i^iv!^. He that hath the gift of teaching,and exhorting,and ruling,and wait- cth upon this gift, what is he but a Teacher, Paftor,and Ruling- Elder f And this mufl either be granted, or eife we mufi open a door for all members of the C hurch, even women, not only to preach and teach, but to rule alfo, and to wait upon preaching and ruling : This truth is fo clear, as that the Papifls themfelves being convin- ced of it, do fay upon this text , that the Apoftle here firft fpcaks of gifts in general ; and fecondly, apply eth thefe gifts to Ecclcfiaftical Officers,v.6. and afterwards cmuim « dirc&s his exhortation to all Chriftians in general. ia P idi > \ n The third text for the divine right of the Ruling- Elder ', 7 °^' iz ' 6s is, 1T/0M.17. Let the Elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honour > eftcc/ally they who labour in the Word and Doftrine. F-r the undei (landing of which words, we will lay down this rule, That every text of Scripture is to be interpreted according to the literall and grammatical conftru&ion > unlefs it be contrary to the analogic of Faith, or the rule of Life,or the circum* fiances of the Text: othet wife, we (hall make a nofc of wax of the Scriptures, and draw quidUbet ex quohbet. Now according to the Grammatical conprucfion , here arc plainly held forth two forts of Elders s the one, tnely ruling \ ^d the othcx, alfo labouring in Word a#d Dotfrine. Give us leave to give you the cr^ic analyfis of the words. 1. Here i . Here is a Gauu y a general, and that is Elders. % . Two diftinft fpecies, or kinds of Elders,7^/, to labour abundantly i Tbejf. 5.11, 1 Cor. 3. 2. where the fame word is ufed that is here expreffed. If the Apoftlc had meant to have diftinguifhed them by their extraordinary labour, he would rather have faid, i*$trn<) then wmimiit 5 for othcr-where he ufcth ^9-, as a degree of painful labour, above kot&, which is put 1 Cor. 1 i.x 7 . for common labour, R0m.16.12. Dr. Dervname and o- ■ Thc ^--9- thcrs, interpret the words of one and the fame Elder, thus. The Elders that rule well, arc worthy of double honour, cfpccially they that labour > that is, (fay they) eftecia/ly they labouring, or efrecjal/y becaufe they la* cur. And fo they make their labouring, to be tlic chief caufc G of M of cheir double honour. But this interpretation is againft . the literal meaning, for the Greek is not h miZw y if they la four Jd\\t h<*m*l U KomZim^efitcially they that lafour.Hctc is a participle with an Article, and a decretive p article , which can never be rightly and literally tranflatcd c au~ f"m in i7 f 4tive h' Anc * therefore we conclude , together with pifcator'in' our Reformed Divines, that this text according to the locum. proper and Grammatical conftruftion of it, doth hold Caivirvn loc. fo|th untQ flU unprejudiced chriftians, a Ruling Elder, diftinft from a teaching Lldcr, which is the thing we undertook to prove. Befidcsthefe three Scriptures thus expounded, wc fhall briefly offer one more $ and that is, Matth v 1 8. 17* where the offended Brother is bid to tell the church, &c. In which words, the whole power of excommu- nication is placed by Chrift in the Church. The great qucftion is, what is meant by Church > Here wc take for granted : 1 . That by Church, is not meant the ci- vil Magiftrate, as Erafttu fondly imagined* 5 for this is utterly contrary to the purpofe of Chrift, and the aym of that discipline here recommended to be ufed, which is the gaining of our brother unto repentance • w hcreas the aym of the civil Magiftrate , is not the Spiritual good properly and formally of the offender,but the publiquc good of the Common- Wealth. And belidcSjit is a lan- guage unknown in Scripture, to call the Magiftrate the Church 5 and it is an expofition purpofely invented^ to overthrow all Ecclefiaftical government. 2. That by Church, is meant primarily and efteciaHy the particular Congregation •, we do not fay onely , but firftly and cfpecially. Hence wc argue * If the power of Excommunication be placed in the particular Church , then either in the Minifter aloac, or in the Minifter C43l Miniftefand whole Congregation , or in the Minifter and Elders chofen by the congregation. But not in the Minifter alone, who being but one man,can no more be called a Church ? then one man can be Galled many, or a member called a body. For one *d*enimtmA perfon cannot be called a Church, (faith Bellarmine gSjSL himfelf, ) feeing the Church is the people and King- Ecciejufit dome of God. It is certain, that the Church here fpo- f0 ^ ( & **" ken of, is a certain number met together $ for it is faid, Where tm or three art gathered together, &c. Nor in the Minifter and whole Congregation •, for God who is the God of order, not of confufion, hath never committed theexercife of Ecclcfiafticall jurif- diftion, to a promifcuous multitude 5 the Scripture di- vides a Congregation into Rulers and Saints , into Go- vernors, and governed-,and if all be Govcrnours,who Ha^S-Wf' will be left to be governed i And befides, if the col- lective body of a Church be the Govcrnours,then wo- men and fervantsmuft govern as well as others. And therefore we conclude, that by Church, muft needs be meant, the Minifter and Ruling- Elders,which are the Officers we arc enquiring after. And th's is no new interpretation , but agreed unto c * - u by ancient and modern Writers. ChryfoJIome faith, by M^tch^s. * Church, is meant the m^n^mn^tbt Rulers of the Church, C ame,.deEc- Camcr. theColledgof Pre byters ^ others, the Ecclefta- tfrfcupod call Senate. Thcfe are called a Church,for four Reafons: Macth - xg - 1 . Bccaufc it is ufual in the Old Teftamcnt/to which our Saviour here alludcth, as appears bythG words Publican and Heathcn^to call the Aflembly of Princes and Elders a Church, Numb.??. 12,24,2;. with Deut. 1.16. 1 Chron. 13, 2^. with 28.1,2. & 29.1,6. Dew. 31.28,30. 1 King. 8. 1, 2,55. Num. j. 2. compared with Lcvit.1315. G 2 2. Be- 2. Bccauft they manage Church affaires in the name of Chrift, and of the Church , and arc fcrvants of the Church, as well as of Chrift. 3. Becaufc they arenas it were, the eyes and cars of the Church 5 and therefore as the body is faid to fee or hear,when as the t yes and eares alone dp (ee and hear ; fo the Church is faid to fee, hear, and ad, that which this Senate Eccleftafticall doih fee 3 hear, and ad. 4. Becaufe they reprefent the Church -, and it is a common form of fpeech, to give the name of that which is reprefented, to that which reprefents it h as wc fay, that to be done by the whole Kingdome, which is done by a full and free Parliament. Hence we might further argue: If the Col/edge of Presbyters reprefent the Church , then itmuftbernadeufof Riding-Elders, as well as Minifters. For Minifters alone cannot reprefent the Church 5 the Church confifling not of Minifters alone, but of Mini- fters and people, who are part of the Church as well as Minifters, and are fo called, -^.15.3,4. This is all we (hall fay, for the Scriptural part. As for the Primitive times of the ChurcbjNC fbould have wholly waved the mention of any thing about them, were it not for the baft calumnies & reproaches which the Prelatical party caft upon the Ruling- Elder, in fay- ing, That it is the newfangled device of Calvin at Geneva; and never known in the Church of Chrift before his E ifco c b ^ a y cs# There is a Bifhop that makes offer to forfeit his life S>ivin°c^ght. y to juftice, and his reputation to fbame, if any man living can^ Jhew^ that ever there was a Ruling-Elder in the Chilian world^till Tavcll and 'VivctfirJl created them. But be hath been abundantly anfwered by Smeftymmus^ infbmuch, . *hat whereas in his Epifcopacy by Divine Right, he boldly. [45] boldly avcrrcth , that the name of the Elders of the o8j Church, comprchcndcth none but preachers, a and 109,111. ' that therefore none but they may be called Senjores Ec- clefw, Elders of 'the Churchy though fome others haply may have the title of Semorespopuli, Elders of the people, becaufe of their civill Authority. Yet notwithftanding afterward, the fame Bi/hop in his b reply to Smecijm- £pag.M*. w*/^ acknowledged, thatbefides Paftors and Doctors ,^ mdc& and befides Magistrates and Elders oft- e Ctty, thexe are to Synagoga, be found in Antiquity, Senio/es Ecclefiaflici^Ecclefiaftical %*j$ e * St , Elder $ alfo 5 only hcalledgeth, they were but as our wares bdto- Church-Wardens,orrather,as our veftry-men- 3 where- ^f h0 'Z m as in truth, They were fudges in EcclefiafticaU controver- mb^gcbL fies 9 and did affift the Paftor in ruling and governing &**« ec- the Church-, witneffc that famous place in * Ambrofc^l*;ff which testifies, that both in the fervi]}) and in the Chrijli- gmh\ obfo- an Church, there were thefe Ecclefiajiicall Rulers. This is Jf^SjT alfo the judgment of b Teriull/an, c Origen, d Baftl, e Op-nvoL°'~ rm defidia^ aut mzgis fupey b'ui, Hum foil vol unt al/quid^a'ai, Anbro r . in i Tim.f. b ' Prajident prubati qvtiquc Senior es honor cm ifltun nonpretio fedteftimonit Adept 1. Tcrtull. Apoiog. cap. 3 9. c NonnuUi pr&po [infant qui in vitam ej~ mores eorum cjtii admit tuntur incjuirant, ut qui turpi* commhtant its communi cost h interdicAnt, cftti vero *b iftis Abhorrent t ex animo complexi meliores quotidie redda»t, Orig, lib. 3. Contra Celfum. d Bafil in Pfa lm 3 3 . Vbi qHatvo,- gmdtts CMiniftrorum confistftit, ejnod feiltcet aI'u fi*t in Ecclefia infiar ocnlorM?n,tit S emotes; alii infiar lingua, fit Pafiores; alii tanquam mantis, tit Diaconi, & C. c Optatushb. 1. adv erf. Par men. mentioning a perfecution, that did for a while fcatter the Church, faith, Erant Ecc/efa ex attro & argento tjuam plurima ornament a, nee dfodere tcrrtjiec fecnm portare poterAt,qttAre fidelibtu Ecelefit Senioribtu commendavit. ^Alba[pinans tha: learned • Antiquary upon that place acknowledged, That befides the Clcrgy,therc were certain ofthe Elders of the people, men of approved life, that did. tend the affaires ofthe Church,of whom tkis place is to be underftocd. tatHSy , ? Etnos & m * * Hierome^ 5 Augufiine^ ' Gregory the great , and h*bemns divers others cited by J-uHellm in his Annotations in in BccU- Can. EccL Affricam^ and by Voetius, and by Smettym- fia Sena- nuus^nd by the Author of the ^[fertion of the Scotch turn no- Dtfcipline, fome of which are rehearfed in the Margent. ftrttm, ca- yy Q w jjj conc i uc j c t hi s Difcourfe , with the confeflion fa?ero~ ej ' ofArchbifhop wbitgiftfi great Writer againft the Pres- r*m cum byterial- Government 5 I know (faith he) that in the Pri- & go * inter mitive Church jhey had in every church Seniors, to whom cat era the Government of the church was committed^ but that was ttiamftn- before there was any Chrifiian Prince or Magiftrate. ts fuJea And therefore, let not our refpe&ive L ongregations /fl^'jwfufferthcmfclvcsto beabufed any longer with a falfc quomodo J ° peterit habere concilium, quod proprie Seniorum eft? Hier. ;v T f.g.2. 5 Aug. writing in his 1 37. EpiiVle to thofe of his own Church, directs his Epiftle, Dilelliffimis P ambus, Cleroyfenioribus, & unit erf* plebi Ee- clefia Hipponenfis. So again. Aug. fib. 5. contra Crefamum y i'\^6. Peregrinut Presby- ter, & Senior es Ecc/eJ*e Mptfjticann caufam quern plebs fanQa fcarthaginenfis Ecclefict Epifcopum fuerat in oculis Dei Jortita, Senicrum liter is ejufdem Ecclefia poftulantibus audire at que d f cuter e. k Gregor. Magnus Jib.u. ep, 1 9. Si quid de quocunque (fltrico ad aures tuat pervenerit, quad tejuftc pojfit ojfendere,faci/e non credos x fed pr a fenti bus Ecclefx tUaSenioribuf dill tenter eft ptrfcrntanda vet it as, & tunc ft qvaUtas rei popofcet, Canonic a diftrttlio cu/pamferiat delinquent is. We fliould h ave added before } that in atlis purgationisCaciltani &F& inquirant diligent er qutfint ift& di^en fonts, belief, C47l belief, that the Ruling- Elder is a new device, and an Of- ficer never known in the Church of God, nor Word of God. For \vt have fufficiently (as we conceive ) proved it to be warranted by the Word, and to have been of ufe in the purer times of the Church. Three things we (hall defirc toadde, asaconcfufion ofthisdifcourfe. i. That there are prints of the Ruling- Elder remaining smongfl us even at this day ; for as the Overfeers of every T?m(h}hMc&refemhlanccofthf Deacon $ fothe Church- warden hath fomefoot-fleps of our Ruling-Elder 5 though we muft needs confefs, that this Office hath been much abufed • and we could defire it might be laid afide , and the true Scripture -Ruling-Elder fet up in his place. 2. That che Prelatical Divines, s which are fuch great Sut ii v ius that thofe Vvho are grofiy ignorant, orfcandaloas, Jheuld be kept from the Sacrament (Jft bey offer to come) by the Officers of the Church. 3 . That it is the Will offefus Cbrsft, that (fhHrch'Governours have [owe f tiff ic tent way to find out who arefttch ignorant andfcan- dalostsperfons, that they may be kfpt away. i. Propofi- That it is the wMrfJeftiS (flyrift , that *io grofiy ignerant, vr tion. fcandalous perfon, jhould come to the Sacrament. i. Yio grofiy ignorant per fen , becaufe the Scripture kith, that a matt muft firjl examine bimf elf , and fo eat of tbit bread, and drink of that cup •, and it like wife faith,that he that will come to the Sacrament muft be one that difcerneth the Lords body 5 otherwife he eats and drinks damnation to btmfelf % and it adds, that we are to do this in remembrance of Chrfft^ and thereby to jhew forth the Lords death till he come. And therefore a man that is grofiy ignorant, and is not able to examine hirnfelf, nor to difcernthe Lords body, nor to remember Chrift,nor underftands whatitistof! 17 * munion with them in that ordinance. 2. That he who upon due examination,can find none of thefe qualifications, fhould not prcfume to come, which appears : 1 . By the Apoftolical command^* let a man examine himfelf^aad fo let him m ; y^ 3 and notsther&ifc. 2 . By the fin which he commits, in being guilty of the body and blotdof Cbrtjl, verf. 27. 3. By the Danger he incurrcs to himfelf, [netting and drinking his orvn damnation^ verf. 2p. 2. From the nature of the Sacrament. T . It is the table of the Lord ^and the Lords Suffer \ and cenfequently the f ricnds,and not the enemies of Chrift, arc thereto incited. 2. It is an ordinance wherein we publiquclyprofefs communion with Chriit and his myftical body & if he that co-ncs,be by fin disjoyned from Chrift,he is guilty of a /if /v legions lyeagainfi him and his Churchy whileft he profeflTcth himfelf to be zfriend, and is really an enemy. 3. It is '.'according to the nature of all Sacraments,) a fealing Ordinance , as is intittaiaimthoferemarkableR ™-* 11 - factumcntal phrafes, This is my bedy^ this is my bleoi^ de- noting not only a bare facramemal Ggnifkanon, but al- fo a fpiritual obfignation and exhibition of Chrifts bo- dy and blood, to a worthy receiver. Now a feal fuppo- feth a writing to # hich it is annext, or elfe it is a mecr nullity 5 and certainly thrift never intended to have hifi Seal C54] Seal put to a blank or counterfeit writing. 4. It is an ordinance appointed for the nouriftiment of thofe who arc fpiritually alive,Chrifts body & blood being therein conveyed nader the Elements of bread & wine • which they only can cat and drink, who are alive Joh.tf .;?. by Fakh,and not they that are dead in trefpaffes & fins. 5 . It is the New Teftament in the blood of Chrift y that is, d confirmation of the New Teftament ^ and of all the promi- fes and priviledges thereof in the blood of Chrift, which 1 Tim, 4.8. belong not at all to wicked men, Godlineffe having the promifes of this life, and that which is to come. By all which it appears, that it is the Will of Chrift , that no fcandalous perfon Ihould come to the Lords table. i. Propofi- That it is the Will ofjefus Chrift, t hat thofe Vvho are grojlj ig- tioa. nor ant > or fcanda/oujlj wkked^fljould be kept from the Sacr ament , (if they offer to come,) bj Chttrch- Officers. And this is evident : I , From the fo^er given to Church'Officers for that purpofe. 2. From the cvillconfequents that will otherWife enfue. 1 , That fuch a power is given to Church-Officers, appears, Net onely From the proportionable pra&ice of Church-Officers under the Old Teftament, who kept the charge of the a iChr. holy things of God, and were appointed 2 to fee that E^ck 9 7 none who were unclean in any thing, or uncircumcifed 8 . 'in flefh, or in heart, fhould enter into the Temple , to *Levit.io. partake of the holy things of God, and b had a power Ezck.ii. to put difference between holy and unholy 5 which *& power was not mcerly docJrinali or declarative, but deci- five^ bindings and juridically fo far , as that according to their fentence, men were to be admitted, or excluded. That there was a power in the Old Teftament to keep men from the Sacrament of the Paffeovcr, for morall wickednefle $ Liil wickednefle i vide Aarons rod bloflbming , lib. I . cap. 5>,xo,&c. But alfo 3 From that power of Government, and key of Difci- pline^ committed by Jefus Chrift, to Church-Officers, under the New Teftamcnt. For Chrift hath given to them the keys of the Kingdom of heaven, which imply notonlyakeyofdo&rine, but of difcipline, and that both to keep otttfuch as Chrift would not have received in^ and tojhut out fuch as Chrift would not have to continue in 5 The ufe of a key being for both thefepurpofes. For (hutting out thofe that fliould not be continued in, as is granted on all hands from divers Scriptures. c And cop- c 1 o>r. ?. fequently , for keeping out thofe that fhould not be received 1 1- fXthcre being the fame rcafon of both. For to what pur- Jf^* 14 * pofe fbould fueh be received in , as are by Chrifis command Tit.3.10. irnmedtately to be cafl out again. 2. That divers ill confequenccs will otherwife en- fue, if grofly ignorant, and fcandalous perfons be not kept away, is plain. 1. Church-Governours jhou f dbe very m faith full Ste- wards of the Mysteries ofchrift, andpreverters of his Ordi- nance. If a Steward to whom his Lord hath commit- ted his goods to be carefully diftributed, to fuch as are honcft, faithfull, and diligent in his field or Vineyard, (hall not only admit of Loytcrers, and fuch as by theic cvill example difcourage others- but alio (hall give to fuch the bread and wages which belongs to them who are faithfull and induftrious, fhould he not be accoun- ted a very unjuft and unfaithful] Stcward,and an abufer of his truft? 2. They fliould be guilty of polluting andprophaningthe Sacrament. If a Minifter fhould give this Sacrament to an I I 3 an Infant, or to a Mad-man, or to ameer fool- 9 orto a Swine, or a Dog, would nor all men fay this were a horrible prophanation thereof/* Shall it then feem afmall prophanatwn to give it unto me who is as ignorant as an In- fant* and Wa'ioWeth as a Swine in the mire ofjin and uncleannefs f 3 . They Jbonld exysefs a great deal of cruelty and inhumanity /« the fonUfhim to whom they give the Sacrament ; becaufe chey give it to one who will cat and drink his own damnation. 4. They Will hereby make themf elves accejfury to his ft n of m- -worthy receiving ; For it is a certain Rule in Divinity 5 He that ftiffers a man to commit Jinjvhen it is in his po^er to hinder himjs levit.19.17. aecejfary to the fin that that man cowmits-, as appears by the «iS*m;». acxamp le of £//; And therefore, if the officers of the Church that are deputed by Chrift to kcepgrofly ig- norant,or fcandalous,from the Sacrament,fliallyct not- withftanding fuffer them to come,and can hinder them, but will not,they themfelvcs become guilty of his fin. $ . They do hereby grie ve the Godly ,t hat are members of the fame Congregation^ and as much as in them lies^ the) pollute & defile the whole Congregation: Tor know yon mt, faith the Apoftle, that a little Letven Uaveneth the whole lump i 6. Adde laftly , that hereby they bring down the judgments of God upon the congregation-, according to that text, 1 Cor. 11. 30. For this caul e many are fick. From all this,we argue thus * If Church-Officers un- der the Old Teftament had an authoritative power to leparate between the holy and prophanc $ and if under the New Teftament they have a p wer to keep out from the Sacrament, fuch as are grofly ignorant , or fcandaloufly wicked 5 and if it be the Will of Chrift , that the Officers of the Church fhould be faithful Ste- wards of the My fteries of Chrift, that they fhould not pervert,nor pollute his Ordinance ^ that they fliould not be cruel to the fouls of their Brethren, or be partakers of other UOH. [573 other mens fins ; that they fhould not grieve the Godly, nor bring guilt and judgment upon the Congregation of which they are Officers : Then it is the Will of Chrift, that they fhould not give the Sacrament tofuch 3 who aregrofly ignorant, and fcandaloufly wicked. That it u the Will of Chrift,/^* Church- Governours i-Propdh have fome fufficient way to discover who are fuch ignorant and fcandalous per Jons, that they mxy be kept away. This followeth clearly from the two former Propofi- tions. For if it be the Will of Chrift, that no grofly ig- norant,or fcandalous perfon fhould come to the Sacra- ment •, and if they offer to come,fhould be kept back by Church-Officers 5 then it follows, That they muft have fufficient way to deteft who arc ignorant and fcanda- lous. For Chrift never wills any endjbut he wills alfo aline- ecjfa r y andfujficient mean, conducing to that end. Now what fufficient means can be propounded or imagined, for detection of ignorant or fcandalous per- fbns,but by examination before thefeChurch-Oflficers; examination, we fay, ofthepcrfons thcmfelvcsincafc of ignorance,and of witneffes alfo in the cafe of fcandal. For though in fome particular cafes for private fatis- faftion, private conference with the Miniftcr alone may fufficiently difcovcr the knowledge or ignorance of pcr- fons \ yet in*this common cafe, for publiquc fatisfafti- on touching thefitnefsofperfons for the Lords Sup- per, no feflcthena publikc and judicial examination before the Eldcrfhip can be fufficient * inafmuch as an authoritative aft of admitting, or rcfufing the perfons fb examined, depends thereupon. Toilluftratethis; If a man by his laft Will and Tcftament,fl)ould leave untothc Matter and Fell >wsofa Collcdgc intrufta I fur* C;8] fum of mone£, to be diftributed to hopeful poor fchol- lais, fuch as were well vcrft in the learned Arts and Tongues : Would it not hence follow $ i . That choie IruHccs have a power granted them by th e Will, to examine thofe that come to ddhe that Le- gacie. 2. That if any rcfufe to be examined, or upon exa- mination be found inefficiently qualified > they have authority to refufe them. 3. That them ft fufficient, proper, and fatisfaclory way, is not to trufl: to Reports or Teitimonials, but to examine the perfons themfelves that fue for fuch a I e- gacic : So in the pre fent cafe, Jelus Chrift hath left as a Legacic, the Sacrament of his Body and Blond, and hath left the Church Officers in truft with it , and hath {aid in his Will,That no grofly ignorant, or fcandalous per- form ought to come to partake thereof -,and if any come, that he be debarred from it by thofe Church-Officers, Hence it followeth inevitably. 1 . That thofe in trufl have power to examine fuch as de- fire to pvtak: of this Legacic, whether they be of fufftcient knowledge and of good convcrfation,orno. 2. 'ha^ they have power to refufe all fuch as either rcfufe to be examined^ or upon examination, are found inefficient. 3. That ifihe Ctsurch Officers would give up their account with oy at the great day of judgment, they ought not to refl fatisfied with private Reports or Informations of others 5 but to examine the persons themfelves, that thereby thfcy may faithfully dif- charge their trufl in a matter of fo grea: concernment ; And that they that will have the Sacrament , according to the will of Chrift, ought firft to fubmit themfelves to fuch examination. Jiefides this that hath been faid, to prove that thofe that that would come to the Sacrament ought fit fl to fir'b- mit to examination-, We (hall further offer thefe follo- wing Arguments. i. We argue from that general exhortation of the Apoftle, i Pet. 3 . i v . But Janclife the Lord God in your hearts, and he ready alwayes to give an an fiver to every man that askctbyou a reajon of the hope that is in yon > with meek- nefs and fear. Now if Chriflians are bound to give an account of their Faith and hope to every one that askcth them, yea even to heathen Per [centers : how much more oughc they to do it to the Officers of the Church.'efpecially at fuch a time, when they defire to be admitted to an Ordinance that is not common to all forts of Chriftians, but pecu- tzelumfigg* liar to fuch as arc indued with knowledg, and of an un- ^/^^ blameablc life and conversion. ».iEcchp*quod 2. Fron that power that fefusChrifl hath feated in his ^ " C(S!U Church, of examining fuch as are by the WAlof Chrifl to.be $&#*&+ excommunicated from the Sacrament. That there is iritJeuuUdifm power of examining , in order to excommunication, J^SSri appears from Matth. 18.16,17. and from Revel i.i. EccifLtcw- vvlicrc Chrift commends the Angel of the Church qf /w ** w [f ^ c ~. Ephefus, bee an fe hectmidnot hear them winch were evi' 1 , pectf&c And hid try ed them who [aid, they were /fpofllts, and were & not, and had found them lyars. This trying was not only ^ charitative, and f rat em all, but authoritative and judicial! . For it was an a3 of the Angel of the Church •, which [ - . ; ^> Angel is not to be undei flood indiv dually , but Cplrum. le&ively, for all the Angels in Ephefus. And that there frThatthe were more Anqels then one in Ephzfcs , appears from J ';"■'' Aci.io.ij. (The like may be fa id of the ".ngdof the Church of Smyrna, Pcrgamus,Tbwt *»,&€. for Chrifl fpcaks unto each Angel in the plural number, Rev.v 10,1^14.) I 1 Fro n From henee we argue, Ifhfus Chrifl hath given power Ah- thoritativeljyto examine fuch as are to be cafi out from the Sacra- ment* then he hath alfo given po^tr to examine fuch as are to Be received in. For there is the fame reafonof both. And as the power of excommunication wowld be wholly ufelefs and frnftra- neous,if there were not a power of examination precedent there- unto ; fo would the power of keeping fuch as are grofly ig- norant or fcandalous , from the Sacrament, be utterly in vain, and of no benefit to the Church of Chrift, if the power of exa- mination fhould be denyed unto it. And certainly, whofoever is an enemy to this power, mutt be forced to grant, that it is the Will of Iefus Chrifl , that all forts of people, though never fo wicked, though actually drunk, though fooles , though Turks, lews, or Heathen, are to be admitted to the Saeraracnt, if they come unto it. Tor if there be no divine right of Examination^ or of rejection, how dare any Church or State ajfume a potyer of making rules for ■ beefing any perfonsfrom the Sacrament ? fhould they make rules tor keeping ignorant and fcandalous perfons from the bearing of the Word, would it not be accounted a fin of an high nature ? And is it not as great a fin to keep any from the Sacrament, if Chrift hath left no power for the doing of it r 1 is not this to be wife above what is written ? And therefore let us either admit all forts to the SacramentjWithont any diflinftion of perfons, and there- by become guilty of the body and blood of Chrift, and acceflary to the fins of thofe that come unworthily; (as hath been faid,and formerly proved,) or elfe let us diligently and confeientioofly examine a 1 of all forts, that defire to be made partakers of thts diftinguifhing ordinance. 3. From the titles that are given to the Officers of the Church , and from the duty that God requires a-t their hands. The Officers of the Church arc called Rulers and Cjovernoursfc fuch as are over their people w the Lord. And it is their duty to Watch over thetfouls of their people, as fuch as muft give ax account 1 Cor.11.28. fo r ^cm nntoGod Now it is all the reafon in the world,rhatthey l Tim. 7. 1 7. that muft give an account to God for their people , fhould take an 1 Tbefl". y . 1 z. account of their people ,-and that they that Watch over their fouls, tkbaj.17. fiould know the ftate of their fouls, And that they that are Co- vernoHrs, Ruler s y and OverfeerSy/hould teovhyinfirutl , try And examine thofe over Whom thej rule and govern. But you will fay, who arc thefc Rulers andGovernottrs, - by whom we are to be examined < ^^ ' The Anfwcr to this , will lead us to the third thing Anfa. propounded 5 and that is to prove, That the power of examining thofe that defire to be admitted te the ™ c 3- Partlcu ' Lords Sapper, belongs not to the Minifier alone y nor to the Mini- fter with the whole (fhurch^but to the Minifier & Ruling Elders. i. Not tothe Mwijler alone.lndccd there isanexamina- GaU.*.wh«i tion, which belongs only to the teaching- Elder, and ^^ d gpQ . that isa catechizing of his people in publique,by quefti- ^fi[ y ' gni '. ons and anfwers^and this is part of the key of do&rine. fictha teaching But the examination that we are now treating of, be- ^an^rs* longs to Difcifline and Government $ for it is not only a naked cxaminaticn,but an autboritativedeterminingtvhe- ther the fart j examined jhall Le detained from the Sacra- ment, or admitted '• which is formally an ad of Church- Government , and therefore belongs not tothc Mini- fteralone, buttoallthofe whom Chrifthafb made Church- Governours,alfb: of which fort are the Ru- ling-Elders, as hath been fufficiently proved. The power of Difcipline is given by Chrift not to one El- u der, but to the united company of Elders : and for one Miniftcr alone to affume this power unto himlelf, it is to make himfelf the Church ; it is to make himlelf a Congregational Popc^it is a bringing in of a Power in- to the Church, that would have lome refcmblancc (as was objected) to auricular confeifion. Now there are two things wc are very confident of $ 1 . That when the Parliament gave their allowance to the PresbyterialGovernmcnt,ifthey had put the whole juridical power of the Church into the hands of the Mi- nifier alone, they that now fcem fb willing to come to be examined by theMinifter without his Elders, would have Nonun Sect t*3 have more bitterly declaimed againfi: that way, then now they do agamft this : For this indeed were to make every Minifter a Prelate in his Congregation ; and (as we now faid) to bring in that which hath fome refem- blance to auricular confejfton. 2. That it is as warrantable by the Word of God, for one Minifter to afTume the whole power unto himfelf alone, of fufpending pcrfons from the Sacrament, who have been duly admitted thereunto (which is a graduall cxcommunication)as it is to affumc the whole power of admitting unto the Sacrament-, for contraricrumca em eft ratio. And oh that our Brethren in the Miniftry, that take this power unto thcmfelvcs, would ferioully con- ficfer what is here faid. Secondly, the pawer cannot be placed in the whole Church colle&ivcly taken \ for then it frould be alfo in children and fervants. The Scripture makes an exjd: diftincftion between Rulers^ and Ruled ; and we are ve- ry well affured,that if this power were feated in the Mi- nifter and whole Congregation, that they that are now fo unwilling to come before the Minifter and Elders, would be much more unwilling to come before the Mi- nifter,and whole Congiegation.And therefore we con- clude. That this power of examining, and receiving un- to the Sacrament fuch as are fit, and detaining fuch as are found tobegrofly ignorant, and vifibly v. icked muft needs belong to the Minifter, affifted with the El- ders, chofen out from amongft the reft of the Congre- gation : For if the Llders are Rulers, and Governours, feated by God in his Church,(as hath bren abundantly proved)then it will undeniably follow, Thar rvhatfoevcr is properly an acl of Government jnufl be long to them as well as the Minister. And $vho can deny, but that the power of of admitting unto, or detaining from the Sacrament, is an aftoi- Government i and therefore it doth by d: right belong to the tldcrs , as well as to the Minifter. But yet here tve mull carefully diftinguilli between the act of 'examination , and the judgment given upon the perfon examined. The managing of the Examination, is the proper 3 ft of the teaching Elder ^ It is he that is to pray tor a blefTingj It is he, thnt is for order fake to ask thequeftions. But as for the determining whether the party examined be fit or no to receive, this is an aft of power and government, 2nd belongs not to the Mini- fter alone,butto the Elderfhip. And it is a very greac wonder unto us , that people fhould profefs fo much dis-fatisfaftionanddi(l:ke, in coming before the Ru- ling-Elders whereas they cannot but take notice, 1 . That the Elders arefnch, as they themselves havt^ or might have ckofen. 2 . They arc : ho fen for the relief and benefit of the Congre- gation. 1 hat fo the Minifter might not be fole judge of thofe that are to come to the Sacrament,but might have others joyned with him,to fee that he doth nothing out of envy, malice, pride, or partiality, but that all things be managed for the good and edification of them , for whofe fake they are chofen: which two particulars, if our people did ferioufly confider, they would quk kly be pcrfwaded to a hearty and an unanimous fubmiffion unto this ordinance of Jtfus Chnft. There remains the fourth thing yet behind, which is an anfwering of the objections that are brought againft this way cf examination by Minifter and Elders. But this, and divers other conddcrable things , which we fl all propound,to per/wade people unto a checifulobe- ifcencc to this part of Church- Rcfoniiution/o comfor- tably tably begun in many Congregations in this Kingdomc 5 We (hall leave , till we come to that part of this dif- courfc,whicb we call, The E X H O R T A T I O N ; to which we refer the Candid Reader, that defires fur- ther fatisfaftion. And thus we have given you a fhort furvey of the nature of the Presb} terial Government 5 together with an anfwer tothemoft material objections againftit: which we have done only for this end, that fo (as we have faid) we might undeceive thofc, who look upon it as lordly and tyrannical ; and by thefe bug-bears , arc feared from fubmittingto it. Andwebefcech our fe- vcral Congregations, to judge of it, as it is here repre- fented, and to be willing to come under the yoke of it, whichis light andeafie, (being the yoke of thrift; and which will in a fhort time make ourCongrcgations(if re- ceived into them) glorious for their unity, -verity, and piety. We are not ignorant, that it hath many Adverfarics. The obftinately ignorant hates it , becau fc it will not fuffer him to go blindfold to hell. Theprophsncper- fon hates it, becaufe it will not fuffer him to eat and drink his own damnation, by unworthy coming to the Sacrament. The Hcretique hates it, becaufe after two or three admonitions, it rejefts him. The Jefuite hates it, becaufe it is an invinci blc bul wark to keep out Pope- ry. The Schifmatique, becaufe the main defign of it, is to make all the Saints to be of one lip,onc heart,and one way. And above all,the Devil hates it,bccaufe if rightly managed, it will in a fhort time blow up his kingdomc. But notwithftandingall thefe great and potent ene- mies 5 our comfort is, That this Government is the Go- vernment of Jefus Chrift , who is the King of his Church, [*53 Church,tndhath given unto usthekeyesofhis King- donijandhathpromifedtobe withus, to protcft and defendustothe end of the world- upon \\ hofc (boul- ders the government is laid • & though we be utterly un- able, yet he that was able to bear the wrath of God up- on his ftioulders, is able to bear up this Goverment a- gainft the wrath of man. For this end andpurpofe, all power in heaven and earth is given unto him 5 and he is now fitting at the right hand of God, for the more ef- fectual excrcifing thereof : and will there remain,till he hath made all his enemies his foot-ftool. Whofe privi- ledge it is, to rule in the midft of his enemies : And will one day fay, Thole mine enemies , which would not that I fhould reign over them, bring hither and flay them before mc. Be wife now therefore , Oye Kings \ be inflrucltdje fudges of the Earth • ferve the Lord with fear } and rejoyce with trembling* Kijfe the Son left he be *ngrj^ and ye pen fh from the wayjohen his wrath is kindled but a little > t blejfed are all they that put their trujl in him. THcrc remains the fecond particular yet behind 5 and that is the Vindication oj ourperfons^ ( efpecially of fuch amongft us, who are teaching Elders, ) from the (landers and cruel reproaches that are caft upon us 5 which we fl all undenakr , not fo much for our own, as for our peoples fake Jeft hereby ou r Miniftry (houlc! be rendrecfufelefsand ineffectual •, for (as M Anjlim CAih) *&&fudem though a M.mjlerszood unfao.cc is fuff.aent for tmjefi ^J^ jet hu^ood name isnecejfar y for bis people : whoordinar- ptmneufmk lydif cfteemthcDoftrine of him, whofe pcrfon they ft^^f^j d f-eftccm. We thank God, we can fay with the A po i n E:cmo. file, wii h us, It is a very fmall thing tb>it we fhculdbe jud- ged of mans judgment : He tha' judgeth us u the Lord. We K Ecmcmbcr remember what the Apoftlc tells us in that little Book of Martyrs, of 'divers Saints, whofe fhoe-latchets we are not worthy to untye •, who endured cruellmockingsjea more- over bonds and impr if onments, they wereftoned, tbey were fawn off under ^ were tempted, were fain with the [word ,&c. of who » the world was not worthy ,and yet even they were sot t ' ought worthy to live in the world. And therefore we can with the more willingnefs, fuffer otir felvesto be the But of every mans malice,and the fubjeft of eve- ry dayes Pamphlec. We read, that even Elias himfelf was called the troubler of ifrael, by him who was the chief troubler thereof. And that Saint Paul , who was wrapt up into the third heaven, was arcufed by Tertul- lus, to be a Pefl/lent fellow, and a mover of [edition among all the fews throughout the world.- And that the Primi- tive Confeflbrs and Martyrs,famous for the holmefs of their liyes,werc charged before die Heathen Emperors, to be the vildeft of men 5 to be firft murderers,and then eaters of their own children 5 to be guilty of inceftuous Tcnuiiian. marriages, and in their private meetings to commit un- A P ol °g et - cleannefs. And their Religion alfo was reprefented, as the caufeofall the Earthquakes, famines, plagues, and other miferies of thofc times. We have formerly made mention of the reproaches which the Anabaptifs o£ Germany caft upon Luther^ and we might addc the horrible and prodigious lies & (lan- ders railed by the Arians againft Athanafixs, that great Champion of Jefus Chrift^and the hideous and ftrange reports, and bitter inveftivesof Michael Servetus 3 and Zolfeclc, againft Calvin. But that which doth quiet our fpirits,more then all this, is,the confideration of Chrift Jefus himfelf, who when he was here upon Earth, was I accufed to bean Enemy to C«efar, 4 friend to Publicans! And! C«7] ur/Sinnlrs,* Glutton and aWine-bibber^&cc. His enough for the Difciple / hat he be as his Maftcr, and the Servant as his Lord g if they have called the Majler of the houfe Bcl- zebub 5 how much more JhaH they call them of his Houjholdf As for the particular accufacions that are charged up- on us, they are, weconfcfs,very many, and very great^ and if to be accufed, were fufficient to make us guilty, we were of all menmoft miferablc. But wc hope it may be faid of us, as it was ©ncc ofCato, That as he was 32. times accufed) fo he was 32. times cleared and abfo'vtd. And we truft, that the Lord will in due time, difpell all thefe thick mifts and fogs which our adversaries have raited up againft us, and bring forth at laft our Right- enfneffe as the light, and our judgment as the noon day. And we do here pro fefs before the great God, that in all the great changes that have bin lately made amongftus, it hath been our great endeavour to keep our felves un- changed, making the unchangeable Wordom Rule , and the unchangeable God our Reck. And wc are confident, that no mnn will account us Apoflatlzedfrom our princi- ples, but fuch as arc in a great meafure Apoflcti&cd from their orvnpro f e(fions There arc fomc men that Proteus- like, can transform them into all (hapes, for their own advantage, according to the times wherein they live ; and Camelioa-like, can change themfelves into any co- lour but white can turn any thing,but what they fhould be. Andbecaufc we cannot chance our ccnfcienccs with the times, asfomc do; therefore , and therefore only,aixwc counted C/*/?e///**j. It is juft with fuch men, as with men in a fliip at Sca,that will not be perfwaded, but that the lhorc they pafs by moves, and not the (hip wherein tVcy arc. As for Us,\vcare,and hope ("through Gods grace; ever (hall befixt and immoveable in our K a * fiift C««3 firft principles. We were not the cauftrs of the firft War, between King and Parliament 5 but were called by the Parliament to their afliftance : and the ground of our ingaging with them was, The Pr pofitions and Or- ders of the Lord;, and Commons in PirL fan. i o. 1 642 . for bringing in of mon/ and plate, &c. wherein they af- furcd us, that whatever (hould be brought in ihcrecp- on, (hould not at all be employed upon any other occa- fi p, 7 hen to maintain the Proteflant Religion, the Kings authority and bis perfon, in his Roy a 11 Dignity the free courfeofjufiice-, the Laws of the Land •, the peace of the Kingdom ; and the Privtledges of Parliament, againfi any force which fbaUoppo ethem. And in this we were daily confirmed & incouraged more and more, by their mr- ny fu lequent Declarations and Protcitations , which we held our felvcs bound to believe, knowing many of them godly and confeicntious men,of publique Spirits, zealoufly promoting the good both of Church and State. The War we ingaged in by Authority of Parlia- «inh:sBook ment, was only defenfive, (which not only • Bifhop of ehriftian Bilfon, and b Bifhop Sede/I,but divers others of the Pre- KsTettr; kricatway hol <* to be )uftand warrantable.) We nc- tomdefwtk. vcr oppofed the King further,then He oppofed His own Laws : Our aym in all that great Undertaking (as the great Hcart-fearchcr knows) was to fecure Religion, to freferve the Government of the Kingdom,andto ren>ove the Wicked from before the Kingfhat his Throne might he etfa- blifhedin Right eoufnefs* And this A&of ours, was not at all contrary to the Oath otAtlegeance which we have taken \ becaufe the in- tent of thatOath can be no othcr,then to oblige to obey the King, according to the Laws of the Kingdome 5 and to our knowlcdg, we never For our pans, wc tremble to think of thofc formidable IudgmentS C73l Judgments of onr Righteous Cod. And our prayer to God is, that he would keep us finccre in all changes, and that he would plead our caufe for us. And our re- joycing, tstbe ttflimony of our consciences 3 that in fimflicity and godly fine erity^ not witbflefhly mfdomefout by tbe grace §f God^ we have had our conversation in the world. It is the integrity of our confciences 5 that carries us above all the reproaches and flanders that are caft upon us : and that makes us go on in doing our duties, maugre all oppofition -j and cc commit the maintaining of his own caufe, and the cleeringofour callings and perfbns unto the Lord, who judgcth righteoufly. The EXHORTATION. Aving thus in few words , vindicated £4 ps^l f^v both our Government and our Pcr- rsl L J^V .J £ f° ns > we concc i Ve itnecefTary tofub- joyn an Exhortation unto all theMi- nifters^and Elders,and people,thatarc within the Province; which we (hall branch into thefe enfuing particulars : i. Wcfhall dircdlour fpeech unto the Minijlers and Ruling Elders J bat have accepted of \ and do att according to the Rules of the Predjtcnan Government^ they are con- joyned in one and the fame Presbytery. 2. Un.o tbofe of our refpctfive Congregations \that fubmit unto the Government^ and Arc admitted unto the Sacrament of tbe body and blood 'cfcbrift, in tbe Presbyterian way. 3 . Unto tbofe that live Wilkin the bounds of tbe Province ^ and have not yet (ubmittci to the Government, nor are ad- L mitted [7+: mined to the Sacrament, in the Presbyteriall my. i . Wc (hall direft our fpeech unto the Miniftcrs and Ruling- Elders , that have accepted of, and do aft ac- cording to the Rules of the Presbyterian Government, as they are conjoyned in one and the fame Presbytery. That which we have to fay unto them, is, Toperfwadethemto be faithfull in the difchargeof the great trufi committed unto them. To be a Ruler in Gods boufe, as it is a place of great honour, fo alfb of great truB 5 and he that hath this truft committed unto him, ought to be one of a thoufand. It is a good faying of an Heathen, Magi fir atns virum indie at , Magiftracy will try a man what he is ,fo will this office you. Such are the mountains of oppofition you are like to meet with- all 5 fuch is the courage you rau ft put on 5 fuchisthe wifdome and piety you muft be cloathed withall , that we may truly fay with the Apoftlc , Who is fufficientfor thefe things ? As Tacitus faith ofGalba, that he was Ca- pax imperii,nifi imperajfet, thought very fit to have been an Emperour, had he not been an Empereur • fo there arc many that have been thought fit to be Elders , till they were made Elders, Many that feemed very good, when private Chriftians 3 when advanced into places of truft, have proved very wicked. To have the body and blood efchriflSacramentallinyourcuflody 5 To be made Kee- pers of Chrifls Vineyard, and watchmen over his flock ; To have the keyesofthe Kingdom of Heaven commuted unto you: This is not only a great honour , but a great bur- den. And therefore it muft be your exceeding great eare, fo to behave your felves in the Church of God, which is his houfe, that you may give up your account with joy at that great day. For this purpofe we Exhort you s i. That C753 i. That you would labour to difchargc yourOfficc with care and diligence, according to the advice of the Apoftle, Let him that Ruleth, Rule with diligence. The Rom.^i.8. Apoftle forefaw how negligent Elders would bc,in the truft committed unto them ; and therefore hechofeto lay this fpcciall injun&ion upon them. You muft not fuffer the key of difcipline tc&uft for warn of ufing, but muft remember, that the life of difcipline is in the exe- cution •, and that the unprofitable fervant was caftinto //*//, not for ahufmg 5 but for not improving of his Talent. 2. That you would ftudy to Rule with all humility and Self-denyal , not as lording it over Gods heritage, iptt.f. but as being examples to theilock , remembringthe faying of our blefted Saviour, The Kings of 'the Gentiles Luk.i*.!^** exercife Lordjhip • And they that exercife authority upon them } are called Benefactors : But ye pall not I e fo. But h that isgreatefl among you, let him be as the younger ; and he that is chief(o: y as it is in the Greek, he that Ruleth, )as ( he thatferveth. You muft not be as Diotrephes y who lo- fyfa 1 '®"- ved to have the Preheminence \ not as the Pharifees , who laved the uppermoft roomes at feafls, anci the chief feats in ft0 If * ^ the Synagogue. 3. That you would labourto Rulethe Church of God with all peaceab 'enefcand quietnefs j doing nothing out of contention, envy, or malice 5 but all out of pure love, with thefpirit of m-ceknefs and patience. 1 hac the people may read love and gentlcncfs written upon all your admonitions and cenfures. For the fervant of the Lord must not (Irive, but be gentle unto all men, apt to z xkn^ii is teach, patient^ in all meeknef injtrutting thofe that o\pofei6. thtmfelves y if God per adventure wiHgive them repentance ', to the acknowledgment of the truth ; And that they may re- cover thcmfelves out of the (hare of the Devili^who are taken L 2 captive C7« captive b) him at his will. Famous is the faying of our Saviour, Have fait in your felves^ and peace ens with ano- ther. By [ally is meant ( as Chemnitm and others ob- ferve,) fincere dotlrine and difcipline , whereby the peo- ple of God are feafoned, and kept from the putrefadion offinanderrour •, this/i/ns fotobe fprinkled, as thai if it be pofliblc^it may have peace ]oyncd with it. Have fait inyourfelves^ and peace one wnh another. T here are that think ,that fiacerc difcipline and peace cannot ftand together, but they arc confuted by Ghrifts own words. The readied way to have true peace one with another, is to have fait within our felves. There are indced,fbme Congregations, that have this fait, without this peace 5 which is a mifery to be exceedingly bewailed.Therc are others which have^w* without this /<#//, but this peace is a wicked pe*ce& peace«with fin and errcur,which will end in damnation.Butbleffedand happy are Jaofc Con- gregations, that have fah in themfelves^andtrue Chriftian peace one with another. A Church- Officer mud not be a bramble, rending and tearing the people committed to- his charge, but as zfgtree,vine, and *// that it ftudieth unity and truth, but ncgleð Rolinefs and purity. And therefore we be- feech you Brethren, by our Lord Jcfus Chrift , who is called the holy Qne , that you would labour to free the Government from this fcandal. If there be any under your mfpe<3iongrofly ignorant 3 or of fcandalous life and C773 andconveffation, you ought not to admit him to the Sacrament 5 for if you do, you are acceflary to his fin of unworthy receiving 5 you are inftrumentall to the damnation of his foul 5 you pollute the ordinance •, you offend the godly amongft you; you render the Govern- ment obnoxious to juft exception \ and you bring down the heavy judgments of God upon the Congregation. If there be any that after admiffion prove fcandalous, you are to admonifh him 5 and if he continue obftinate, you arc to put aw>iy from mongyour f elves that wicked perfon, to purge out the old leaven ^ that you may be a new lump. And this you arc to do: 1. For the Churches fake ^ that the Church in which you are Rulers, may not be infeded •, for knew you not > that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump f 2. For the (inner s fake ^ you muft deliver fuch a one unto Sat an for the deflruttion oftbeflejhjhat thefpirit may befaye i in the day of the Lordifcfus. 3. For Chritts Jake , that his name may not be difho- nourcd, and that he may noc be forced to depart from yourAtfemblies. 4. Forthe Ordinances fake, that they may not be pol- luted. 5. For your own fakes^ that you maynQt be damned for other mens fins. Oh that our words might take impreflion upon all your heart?, that are Miniilers and Llders within the Prtviiice ! what a glo- rious thing were it, if it might be faid of all our Congregations , that they are not only truest pure Churches, and Churches ur.i- ted in love y andin the truth ? How would this tend to the honour of Jefus Chrift, the King of his Church f How woald this make him delight to dwell in themidlt of you t How would this ftop the mouthes of Anabaptifts,Browniits,and Independents.' How would the blood of Jefus Chrift be preferved from propha- rits, fccking the things of Chrift before, and more then your own $ mourning more for the miferies of the Church, then your own - 7 and re)oycing more in the profperity of Sion, then your own. A Church Officer muft be like old £//,who was more troubled atthcloflfeofthe^r^ then the death of his two fons. And like the Pfalmift , that bewailed more „ the burning of Gods houfe y then his own •, and the defola- Pfal. 7 4.& 137? t { on ofaiJs Churchy then of the Kingdome. 8. That you would labour to be of a liherali and free Jpirit^ feeding theflock of God which is among you , taking the over fight thereof ] not by conftraint, but willingly^ not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind. A Covetous Judas will betray Jefas Chrift for thirty pieces of filver,and fell a good confcience for a mefTe of pottage ; and be prodi- gal of the blood of Chrift, rather then lofe his trading, 9. That you would labour to be of a courazious and refolute (fir it , valiant for the truth and cauje of God ; as Luther was , who alone oppofed a world of Enemies 5 and as Athanafim, who was both as an Adamant \ and a Loadftone, in his private converfe 5 he was very courte- ous and affable,drawing all men to him,even as a Load- ftone doth iron •, butinthecaufe of God, and of his truth, he was unloveable, and unconquerable as an Ada- mant. There is nothing will caufe you fooner to apo- ftatize from your Principles, and from your pra&ices, then bafe fear of men. This made even Peter deny Chrift*, and David,v\m to the Phililfims, & Abraham £0 diffem- ble.The Wife man fa\th,Thefearoffnan bringethafnare, but who (0 putteth his trujl in the Lord,J1)all be fafe. Our prayer to God for you, is. That the Lord would [/peak unto you with a (Irong hand • and in/IrucJ you, that you way not walk in the way oft hi* people, faying a Confederacy unto thofe urns homojo- lm tot'im orbls impetmfufti- Wit. Tfai.8.il 3 x»,l 13,14- [80 tbofe unto* whom this people /hall fay a Confederacy • nor fear their fear: but [ancJtfie the Lord of hofl> in your hearts , and make him your fear and your dread. And you have a moft blcfled promife added, Thztfefw Christ will be unto you for a Sanctuary, to proteft and defend you in the day of your greateft fears and dangers. 10. That you would labour to be of a tender ftirit, tender of the honour of God,of the blood of Chrift Sa- cramental, of the fouls of the people committed co your charge, ofthctruths and Government of Chrift. A Church-Ofificcr muft not be a Callio , not caring what becomes of Rcligion,and the intereft of Chrift. Nor a luke- warm Laodicean, neither hot nor cold , left he be fpewed out of the mouth of Chrift . But he muft be a Jofiab^vhok commendation was this,that his heart was tender 5 a David, whofe eyes ran down with rivers of tears, becaufe men kept not the law : a Jeremiah > who wifhed, that his head were waters, and his eyes a fountain of tears , that he might weep day and night for the fain of the daugh- ter of his people. 1 1 . That you would per fever e and centime in the great truft committed unto you, not defercing,nor neglcfting the duty thercof,for any prefent difcouragements what- foever % remembring what our Saviour frith, He that hath put his hand to the plough ,andlookitb back, is not fit for the Ktngdome of Heaven. We cannot deny, but there arc many things to dif- hcarten you, and make you gro\f faint and weary 5 a//z., your own iniiifliciency to fo great a work 5 thcuntrafl- ablencflc, and unperfvvadeablencfle of many among the people to fubmit unto the Government The /mall be- ginnings of reformation in Church- Government unto which we have yet attained , and efpecially the little M countc- 03 countenance that it finds with many, from whom it might moft juftly be expe&ed. Yet notwithftanding, we hope 5 that that God which hath ftirred you up to help to lay the firft done in this building, will not fuffcr you to leave the work , till the head Jlone be brdught forth with (homings, crying, gr*ce, grace unto it. For this purpofe; we defire you earneflly to confidcr with us-, i. That the Authority by which you aft, is divine. For the office not only of a teaching , but alfo of a Ru- ling Elder, is founded upon the Word of God,as hath been already (lie wed. 2 . That the Government which you have entrcd up- on, is not a Government of mans framing > but the Go- vernment of Jefus Chrift 5 who as King and Head of his Church, hath appointed you your work, and hath Matth 18.20. promifed. That where two or three of jou Mre gathered to- gether in hisn&me, then te be in the mtdfl of yon , to pro* ted, direct, fan&ifie, fupport,and comfort you. This Chrift is tbatftone cut out of the mountain without hands, that wiU defiroy aU the Kingdomes that oppofe him and ha Government, and will h'mfelf become a great mountain^ ft- att ' 1,3M *' ling the whole earth. The time is fhortly coming, when the Kingdomes of this world fhall become the Kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Chrifi •, when the mountain of the MkahjLj j. houfe\of the Lordjballbe eftablijhedin the top of the mountains, and it jhaH be axalted above the hills, and people /ball flow unto it : And many Nations flail fay, Come a„dlet us go tip to the Moun- tain of the Lord, and to the houfe of *the God of 'Jacob, andhe\vill teach us his Mayes, and We VrM Malkjn hispathts* And that Na- tion mdKingdome, that Vvillnotferve the Lord Chrifi , /ball pe* rifb,yea thofe Nations fball be utterly wafted. iTim M ' ' J* ^ ^ e ^ward you fhall have for the faithfull conti^ tihtflw nuance in your office, is not from men>(t hough you de. fcrvc fcrvc, and ought to have even from men double hon- our , and arc to be had in high cfteem from your work fake,) but from God, who hath promifed to give you a crewn tf glory , that fadeth not away , when the chief e Shepherd Jball appear •, which promifc is applicable, not ' Vct -5'*> only to the teaching , but Ruling Elder ; the Apoftlc fpeaking there of Elders indefinitely, without reftri&i- on or limitation. 4. The ftrcngth by which you aft, istheftrcngthof Chrift-,and though'in your felvcs you beinfufficient for fo great a work, (Jer xelo is Efficient fir thefe thwgs)yex by Christ that strengthens you,yeu are able t$ de all things. God never calls a man to any employment , but he gi- veth a competent ability thereunto 5 and is angry with thofe that pretend infufficiency for that Office to which he calls them , as appears by the example of inblameably in the eyes or chc world- fo you would labour to be Saints inwar< a improving not only your wayes unto men , bu«- nr he; r rs and confcicnccs unto the heart- fcarchr.g God. And for this Jcr.4.i4. thispurpofe, we perfwadeyou, to wafh not only your Iiai.i.i*. handsjut your hearts^ from all iniquity^ and nottoftffcr vain thoughts to lodge within you ^ To fat away the evillof Rom.2.1?. your doings from before Gods eyes ♦, To be fows inwardly cir- cumcifedwith the circumcifion of the heart jn the Spirit, not in the Letter, whofe praife u net of Man, hut of God . To labour more to be good, then to feem to be good 5 to be more afliamed to be evill,thcn to be known to be eviS; to ftrive more to get your fins cured^ then covered - y and to'be not gilded^ but golden Chriflians. Alas ! what will itavailyou, tobecfteemed byyourMiniflerand El- ders reall Saints, when the Lord who is your Judge, knows you to be but painted Sepulchres : What will it profit you to have our Euge and approbation, when you have the Apage and difallowancc of God , and all his holy Angels ? And therefore our prayer to God for you is, that he would make you not only nominall, but reall Chriftians ; not only Saints by profeffion, but by coa- verfation t not only morally and formally, but Spiritu- ally and Theologically good , having your perlbns, principles,and aims holy, as well as your actions. He and he only is a right Chrtfiian^ whofe ferfon is united to Chrift by a lively Faith ; and whofe nature is elevated by the Spirit of Regeneration, and whofe principles, praffices, and aims, are divine andfupernatural. Secondly, as it is your great honour and priviledg to be admftted to the Saeramcnt, when others by reafon of ignorance or fcandal are refufed •, foit muft beyour great care, to come worthtly h and fo to demean your fclvcs, that you may be made partakers of the graces & confolationsofthis heavenly banquet. And for this end, we thinkit our dutic to propound certain necefTary drre&ionsto you, for the right ordering of your Sa- cramental D*3 cratftcmar'approaches -, and to perfwadc you by the mercies of our Lord JefusChrift, to the diligent and confricntious practice of thefe following particulars. I. Not to reft contented with the examination of your Miniftcr and Elders, but chiefly and efpecially to examine your felvcs , and fo to cat of that bread , and drink of that cup : To- examine your felves , whether you be in Chrift or no, whether You do truly repent* whether You do hunger and thirft after Chrift in the Sacrament- whether You have an unfeigned love to God, and Your Neighbour,manifcfted by an impartial refpeft unto all the Commandements and Ordinances of Chrift : For though we may and ought to admit you upon the profeflion of thefc graces^ yet Chrift will not bid You welcome, unlcfs You have them in truth and finceritie. And though we cannot difcern who arc hy» pocritcs, and who are fiaccre amongft You-, yet nc that can diftingui-h between ftar and ftar , can and will diftinguifh between a true Saint , and a formal Hypo- crite: and therefore labour to be fuch , indeed and in truth, as You feen* to Us, to be in word and profejfion. Secondly, As not to come without preparation and examination -. fo alfo, not to trufl t$ your preparation and examination. Sacraments do not work as Hiyfick,whe- thermenfieeporwake, ex opere operato^ by vertue in- herent in them •, but ex opere operants, according 10 the dt fro fit ion and qualification of the party that partakes of them. Ifchc party be not qualified according to the te- nour of the Covenant of grace, he eats and drinks dam- nation ro himfclf, and not ialvation ^ and when he hath done all he can by grace received, to prepare himfHt ; yet he mult not rclie upon his prcparation,for this were to make ao Idol of it, and let up dutic inthcronn <^f Chrift.. £88] inte (laf, & Chrift.Excellent is that faying ofAuftine, He that {lands tunftjs. upon his own ftrength^ [hall never [land; and of Bernard , F quinoVtnniit That man labour s in vain, that d tb net labour refiing upon tur. Chris! and his merits 5 and therefore we exhort You, af- ter all your care of preparation, to renounce it as to the point of confidence, and t$ come t$ Chrtfl in the jlrtngth and confidence ofchrifl done. 3. Nott© befatisfied in the bare bringing of the forementioned graces with you to the Sacrament, but to labour according to the advice of the Apoftle, tcftir iTim.i.*. #p the gift ofGodthdt is inycu. The Greek isjobkw up, and caufe the grace of God within us to kindle. Fire,as long as it lycth raked up in the Embers, will give no heat; a man may die with cold, for all fuch a fire. Grace, as long as it lyeth dead in the habite, will not a- vail a man at the Sacrament. And therefore, that you may be worthy receivers, you muft take pains to blow up the grace of God that is in you. You siuft arife and trim your fpirituall lamps, (as the wife Virgins did,) that fo you may be fit to meet with your Bridegroom. You muft brighten your fpirituall armour, & gird up the loins of your mind; You muft not only have,but put on your wedding garment ,and come to this heavenly feaft appar- relled in all your fpiritual ornamen;s. For it is a certain truth , that not only a wicked man,that wants grace,but a chiide cf God that hath true grace , may receive the Mandmttio Sacrament unworthily ^though he cannotcome unwor- fadigwum, thily as the wicked do D out of a total want of grace, yet no iSgtiA. he may come unworthily out of groffe negligence, and Aided. finful carelefnefs, in not exciting and ftirring up, and improving the grace of God that is in hitji. For not to ufe grace, and not to have grace, in this cafc,do little dif- fer in Gods account. And therefore, if you would be worthy [8?3 worthy griefrs at this Supper, you muft not only hare a true Faith, but zfit Faith ; not only a true repentance, but zfit repent- ance ; you muft not only have grace , but act grace ; you muft fet your Faith on weak, to feed upon that blefled Sacramentall promife, Take, eat , this is mj body which is broken for jcu ; This is my blood which is Jhedforjou. And you mull labour to make ftrong and particular applications of Chrift to your fouls, and t# believe, that as verily as you eat the Bread, and drink the Wine, fo verily you are made partakers of Chrifts body and blood, to your everlafting happinefs. And fo like- wife you mull ad repent- ance, love, thankfullnefs,aRd obcdience,accordiqg to the directi- on of the Word of God. 4. To fo^ll that j oh do at the Sacrament , in remembrance of Chrifl* For this is the main defign of Chrift, in appointing this Ordipance,that it might be a Love-token from Chrift alwaiesby us, and an effectual means to keep his death in perpetual remem- brance, that it might be a lively picture of Chrift crucified ; and he that will receive aright, mnft be eying this Picture while he is at the Sacrament; and the more he minds it , the more he will admire it: The Angels * (loopdoton to Aw^upon Chrift incarnate, * P«t.i.n. and it is the happinefs of heaven to have Chrift alwaics before * i™$vp*tit them ; and it is our happinefs on earth, that we h«vc futh t blcf- *»**•* fed commemoration of Chrift crucified : As Chrift is all in all,in '5>^w'>J*i. all Creatures, in all Relations, in all Conditions, and in all Ordi- nances ; fo more efpecially in this : For the Elements of Bread and Wine arc not appointed for natural ends and purpofes , but Chrift is all in all in them : They are Reprefentations, Comme- morations, Obfignations, and Exhibitions of Jefus Chrift. Yon muft labour with the Eye of Faith to fee Quills name written upon the Bread and Wine, and you muft read Chrift in every Sacramental action \ when You behold the Bread and Wine confrcrjted; You muft remember how Jefus Chrift was fet apart by his Father, from all Eternity, to be the Redeemer of his Peo- ple : And when the Minifter breaks the bread, You muft remem- ber the great fu Mir rings that Jefus Chrift endured for Your fins ; and when You take the Bread, and drink the Wine, you muft do this in remembrance of Chrift; You muft bclieve,that now Chrift givcth himfclf to be Yournourifhment, andyonr Comforter un- N to to eternal life ; and you muft labour by a lively Faith, to take liim as your Lord and Saviour, andtocry out with Thomas in the higheft degree (if it be poifiblej of J0H6.51. rcjoycing, My God^ and my Lerd : And when you eat the Bread, and drink the Wine, you muft remember, that Chrift is the living Bread that came down from Hea- ven, and that whofoevcr eaisof this Bread, fiall live for ever: and that whofoevcr eateth the fie fb of Ckrift , and drinketh his blood, dmtleth in Chnfl, and Chrifl in him. And you muft endeavour to receive Sou!-nouri(hment from Chrift, as your bodies do by the bread you eat ; and as the bread is turned into your fubffance, fo to be made more and more one with Chrift by faith: that ha- ving a reall, though fpirituall union with him,You may have a happy intereft and communion mail his pur- chafes. This is the life of the Hfl/y Sacrament , without which, all is but a dead and empty Ceremonie. But we adde further. That this remembrance of Chrift muft not be barely notionall^deEfrinaU^ and hiforicafl, but it muft be alfb practically experimentally and applicative j k muft produce thefe and fuch like blefied cftcdls and operations in your hearts. 1. You muft fo remember Chrift, as to find pow T cr . coming out of Chrift Sacramental ,to break your hearts for all the fins you have committed againft him. Chrift is prefented in the Sacrament as a broken Chrift-,his bo- dy broken, and his bloud poured out : and the very breaking of the bread underftandingly looked upon, is a forcible argument to break your hearts. Was Jefus Chriftrentand torn in pieces for you, and flail k not break you hcart>,that you fhould fin againft him < Was he crucified for you, and will you crucific him by your fins ? And beftdes, the breaking of the bread is not oit- ly ordairfed to be a motive unco brokennefs of heart for fin, but alfo in the right ufe to effeft that which it doth move unto. 2. You mu ft fo remember Ch rift Sacramental I, as to find power coming out of Chrift, tofubdueallyour fins and iniquities ; as thedifeafed woman felt venue coming out of Lhrift,to cure her bloody IlTue • fo there is power in am applicative and jiduciall remembrance of Chrift at the Sacrament, to heal all the finfull iflues of our fouls. There is no fin fo ftrong, but it is conquera- ble by a power derived from Chrift crucified. 3. This is to remember Chrift aiightat the Sacra- ment, when yoir never ceafc remembring him,till your hearts be brought into a thankfull frame to God, for Chrift ; and for his ineffable bleffings and mercies ex- hibitedin the Sacrament to a worthy receiver. And therefore it is called an Eucbarift, or a feaft of thankfgi- ving. It is as Justin Martyr faith , food made up all of T? ^ iv^pt- t bar, k[ giving. It is a cuftome in Collcdges and houfes nS*i bti love, till hebe