>*m **** *> 33- 4- LIBRAEY OF THE Theological Semi nary, PRINCETON, N.J. Case, ^O- S„elf.ZXO\\ Division Section, * 4 Book,/. No, //-/ / / GILL'S COMPLETE BODY OF PRACTICAL AND DOCTRINAL DIVINITY : BEING A SYSTEM OF EVANGELICAL TRUTHS, DEDUCED FROM THE SACRED SCRIPTURES. ABRIDGED, BY WILLIAM STAUGHTON, D, The design of an abridgment, I conceive, is clearly to exhibit the whole substance of an author, without admitting any thing superfluous. Dr. Shaw. Abstracts, abridgments, and references are of use in divinity as well as in law. Henry. I can learn With greater ease, the great concern. Watts PHILADELPHIA : PRINTED FOR DELAPLAINE AND HELLINGS, BY B. GRAVES. 1810. District of Pennsylvania^ to wit : BE IT REMEMBERED, that on the seventeenth Day of July, U the thirty fifth Year of the Independence of the United States oi Seal America, A D 1810 William Staughton, D. D. of the said District, bath deposited in this office, the Title of a Book, the Right whereof he claims as Proprietor, in the Words following, to wit: .... " Gill's complete Body of Practical and Doctrinal Divinity; being a sys- tem of Evangelical truths, deduced from the Sacred Scriptures ; abridged by William Siaugh ton, D. D. « The d -sign of an abridgment, I conceive, is clearly to exhibit the whole substance of an Author, without admitting any thing superfluous. Dr. Shaw. " Abstracts, abridgments, and references are of use in divinity, as well as in law." Henry, I can learn With greater ease, the great concern. Watts. In Conformity to«fcfe Act of the Congress of the United States, intitled, " An Act ibr the Encouragement of Learning, by securing the Copies of Maps, Charts, and Books, to the Authors and Proprietors of such Copies ' durmg the Times therein mentioned." And also to the Act, entitled, '* An Act supplementary to an Act, entitled, " An Act for the Encouragement of Learning, by -ecuring the Copies of Maps, Charts, and Books, to the Au- thors and Proprietors of flOch Copies during the Time therein mentioned," and extending the Benefits thereof to the Arts of designing, engraving,, and etching historical and other Prints." D. CALDWELL, Clerk of the District of Pennsylvania. PREFACE OF the usefulness of judicious abridgments of large and valuable works, a reflecting and unprejudiced mind requires no proof. The reader by these means, becomes possessor of the ideas of an author, with far less expence of time and toilj the purchaser finds the work within the limit of his ability $ copies are multiplied; and through the world information and virtue are increased. Many eminent writers, in relation to their own productions, have testified their sense of the utili- ty of the task of the abridger, by assuming it themselves. The publication of the writings of Dr» Gill, through these United States, appears propitious to the general cause of god- liness. An edition of his Exposition is in the presses of ajgen- tleman in this city, whose talents, integrity, and zeal for the diffusion of evangelical publications, deserve universal pa- tronage. The Body of Divinity is a smaller work, first pub- lished in three quarto volumes, and since edited in three roy- , al octavo; it is here presented to the public in a single volume, in which the substance of the original will be found carefullv retained. It has not been forgotten, that the service underta- ken, was to condense and not to alter:— The sentiments, and even the style of the author are constantly preserved. The Doctor was by profession a baptist, and his views on the sub- ject of baptism, are given with energy and candour; but there is none by whom the doctrines of grace are valued, wh& IV PREFACE. may not reap ample benefit from the following pages. An equal mass of theological knowledge, in a compass so small, will not readily be obtained.* The minister of the Sanctuary will find it an excellent compainon in his preparations for the pulpit; and the private christian, an instructive parlour friend. W. STAUGHTON. July, 1810. *The high estimation in which this work, has been, and still is, held by tr^e friends of vital Religion, may be inferred from the numerous Subscribers to the Quarto Edition, (among whom are the most learned and judicious advocates for Christianity') and from the avidity with which copies have been sought after, notwithstanding the high price they have borne* WinterbothanC s Edition* CONTENTS. First general Distribution of the Work. BOOK I. OF GOD, HIS WORD, NAMES, NATURE, PERFEC- TIONS AND PERSONS. • Page INTRODUCTION, 8 Of the being- of a God, 21 Of the Scriptures, 27 Names of God, 37 His Nature, 41 His Immutability, 45 His Infinity, 48 His Omnipresence, 49 His Eternity, 50 Life of God, 53 His Omnipotence, 55 His Omniscience, 58 His Wisdom, 62 His Will and its Sovereignty, 65 His Love, 69 His Grace, 70 His Mercy, 71 His Long- suffering or Forbearance 73 Page His Goodness, 74 His Auger and Wrath, 75 His Hatred, 77 His Joy, 78 His Holiness, 79 His Justice and Righteousness, 80 His Veracity, 82 His Faithfulness, 84 His Sufficiency and Perfection, 86 His Blessedness, 87 Hi^ Unity, 89 Of a Plurality in the Godhead, 92 Personal relations in the Deity, 98 Of the distinct personality of the Fa- ther, 107 Of the distinct personality of the Son, 108 Of the distinct personality of the Spirit, 113 BOOK II. OF THE INTERNAL ACTS AND WORKS OF GOD. Of the internal Acts and works of God, and of his decrees in general, 117 Of the special decrees of God relating to Men and Angels, particularly of Election, 119 Of Rejection or Reprobation of Angels and Men, 130 Of the eternal Union of the Elect to God, 132 Of Adoption as an immanent Act, 138 VI CONTENTS, Of Justification as an immanent Act, Of the everlasting Council con- cerning' the Salvation of Men, Of the covenant of Grace, Of the part which the Father takes in the Covenant, Of the part which Christ has ta- ken in the covenant, Of Christ as the Covenant head of the Elect, Page 139 139 HI 146 151 152 Page Of Christ as the Mediator of the Covenant, 154 Of Christ as the Surety of the Covenant, 1.61 Of Christ as the Testator of the Covenant, 164 Of the Concern the Spirit has in the Covenant, 167 Properties of the Covenant of Grace, 169 Of the Complacency and de- light of Deity in himself, 170 BOOK III. OF THE INTERNAL WORKS OF GOD. Of Creation in general, 175 Creation of Angels, 181 Creation of Man, 186 Providence of God, 191 Confirmation of the Elect An- gels, 213 Fall of the Non-elect Angels, 23 3 Of Man in a State of Innocence, 217 Of the Law given to Adam, and the Covenant with him in a State of Innocence, 219 Of the Sin and Fall of Man, 224 Of the Nature, Aggravation, and Effects of the Sin and Fall of Man, 228 Of the Imputation of Adam's sin to his Posterity, 231 Of the corruption of Human Na- ture, 236 Of Actual Sins and Transgres- sions, 244 Of the Punishment of Sin. 248 Second general Distribution of the Work. BOOK L OF THE ACTS OF THE GRACE OF GOD IN TIME. Manifestation and Administra- tion of the Covenant of Grace, 251 Its Administration in the Patri- archal State, 254 IJnder the Mosaic Dispensation, 258 From the times of David to the coming of Christ, 260 The Abrogation of the Old Co- venant, &c. 262 The Law, 266 The Gospel, 27^ CONTENTS. VI] BOOK II. OF THE GRACE OF CHRIST AS EXPRESSED IN HIS STATES OF HUMILIATION AND EXALTATION, AND OF THE OFFICES EXERCISED BY HIM IN THEM. Page Of the Incarnation of Christ, 273 His State of Humiliation, 278 Active Obedience of Christ, 280 His Passive Obedience, 282 Burial of Christ, 285 His Resurrection, 288 His Ascension, 292 His Session, His Prophetic office, Priestly Office, Intercession, Sacerdotal Blessing, Kingly Office, Spiritual Reign, Pave 295 297 300 303 306 308 314 BOOK III; OF THE BLESSINGS OF GRACE WHICH COME BY CHRIST, AND OF THE DOCTRINES IN WHICH THEY ARE HELD FORTH. Of Redemption by Christ, 319 Causes of it, , ■" 321 Objects of Redemption, 323 Those passages cf Scripture which favour Universal Redennption, 327 Of the Sanctification of Christ, 334 Propitiation, Atonement, and Reconciliation, 343 The Pardon of Sin, 346 Justification, Adoption, Christian Liberty. Regeneration, Effectual Calling, Conversion, Sanctification. The Perseverance of the Saints, BOOK IV. OE THE FINAL STATE OF MEN. Of the Death of the Body, 403 Immortality of the Soul, 406 State of the Soul till the Resur- rection, 411 Resurrection of the Body, 414 Second coming of Christ, 420 Conflagration of the Universe, The New Heavens and Earth, Millennium, Last and General Judgment, Final State of the Wicked, Final State of the Saints, 352 364 368 371 377 383 387 392 423 427 429 434 439 443 Third general Distribution of the Work, BOOK I. THE WORSHIP OF GOD, OR PRACTICAL RELIGOIN. Of the Object of Worship, 448 Thankfulness to God, 491 Internal Worship, 449 Humility, 493 The Knowledge of God, 451 Self-Denial, 495 Repentance, 454 Resignation to the will of God, 497 Vlll CONTENTS. Page Page The Fear of God, 459 Patience, 499 Faith in God and Christ, 463 Christian Fortitude, 500 Trust and Confidence in God, 471 Zeal, 503 Hope, 474 Wisdom and Prudence, 505 Love, 479 Godly Sincerity, 506 Spiritual Joy, 485 Spiritual Mindedness, 508 Peace of Mind, 487 A Good Conscience, 509 Contentment, 488 Communion with God, BOOK II. 511 OF EXTERNAL WORSHIP AS PUBLIC. Of the nature of a gospel Church, 514 Duties of the members of Church- es to each other, 519 Pastors of Churches, 522 Duties of Churches to their Pas- tors, 530 The office of Deacons, 552 The Discipline of Churches, 536 BOOK III. OF THE PUBLIC ORDINANCES OF DIVINE WORSHIP. Of Baptism, 541 The Lord's supper, 566 The Public Ministry, 572 Public hearing1 of the Gospel, 590 Public Prayer, 577 The Lord's Prayer, 580 Singing Psalms, 584 Place and time of public worship, 584 BOOK IV. OF PRIVATE WORSHIP, OR, OF VARIOUS DUTIES, PERSONAL, RELATIVE, DOMESTIC, AND CIVIL. Duties of Husband and Wife, 595 Duties of Parents and Children, 598 Duties of Masters and Servants, 600 Duties of Majistrates and sub- jects, 601 Good Works, 603 The Decalogue, 604 Baptism of Jewish Proselytes, 607 INTRODUCTION. HAVING completed an exposition of the whole bible, the Books both of the Old and of the New Testament ; I con- sidered with myself what would be best next to engage in, for the further instruction of the people under my care j and my thoughts led me to enter upon a scheme of Doctrinal and Practical Divinity, first the former and then the latter ; the one being the foundation of the other, and both having a close connexion with each other. Systematical Divinity, I am sensible, is now become vei'y unpopular. Formulas and articles of faith^ creeds, confes~ sions, catechisms, and summaries of divine truths, are greatly decried in our age ; and yet, what art or science soever but has been reduced to a system ? physic, metaphysic. logic, rhetoric, &c. Philosophy, in general, has had its several systems ; not to take notice of the various sects and systems of philosophy in ancient times ; in the last age, the Cartesian system of philosophy greatly obtained, as the Newtonian system now does. Medicine, jurisprudence, or law, and every art and science, are reduced to a system or body ; which is no other than an assemblage or composition of the several doctrines or parts of a science ; and why should divi- nity, the most noble science, be without a svstem ? Evangelical truths are spread and scattered about in the sacred Scriptures 5 and to gather them together, and dispose of the m in a regu- lar, orderly method, surely cannot be disagreeable ; but must be useful, for the more clear and perspicuous understanding them, for the better retaining them in memor)-, and to shew the connection, harmony, and agreement of them* Accord- ingly we find that Christian writers, in ancient times, attempt- ed something of this nature ; as the several formulas of faith? X INTRODUCTION* symbols or creeds, made in the first three or four centuries of Christianity. Since the reformation, we have had bodies or systems of divinity, and confessions of faith, better digested^ and drawn up with greater accuracy and consistence ; and which have been very serviceable to lead men into the know- ledge of evangelical doctrine, and confirm them in it ; as well as to shew the agreement and harmony of sound divines and churches, in the more principal parts of it: and even those \vh ) now cry oui against systems, confessions, and creeds, their predecessors had those of their own. Arius had his cr< ed ; and the Socinians have their catechism. The Jews, in imitation of the Christians, have reduced their theology to certain heads or articles of faith. The Scripture exhibits compendiums or systems of doc- trine and duty. What a compendium or body of laws is the decalogue or ten commands, drawn up and calculated more especially for the use of the Jews, and suited to their circum- stances ! a body of laws not to be equalled by the wisest le- gislators of Greece and Rome, Minos, Lycurgus, Zaleucus, and Numa ; nor by the laws of the twelve Roman tables, for order and regularity, for clearness and perspicuity, for com- prehensiveness and brevity. The Lord's prayer consists of petitions the most full, proper, and pertinent, and in the most regular order. And we have a creed made mention of in Heb. vi. 1, 2. consisting of six articles, repentance from dead works, faith towards God, the doctrine of baptisms, and of laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment. Mention is made in the New Testament of a form of doctrine delivered, and a form of sound words that had been heard and was to be held fast, and of a proportion or analogy of faith, according to which ministers were to prophesy or preach. Rom. vi. 17. 2 Tim. i. 13. Rom. xii. 6. It is strongly pleaded that articles and confessions of faith, in which men are to agree, should be expressed in the bare words of the sacred Scriptures ; but without an explanation of their sense of them in other words, it might introduce into INTRODUCTION. XI a christian community all sorts of errors that can be named, it would — 1. destroy all exposition and interpretation of Scriptifre ; for witnout words different from, though agreeable to the sacred Sciiptures, we can never express our sense of them. — 2. To be obliged to express ourselves about divine things in the bare words of Scripture, must tend to make the ministry and preaching of the word in a great measure useless. — 3. This must in a great measure cramp all religious conversa- tion about divine things, if not destroy it. To what purpose is it for them that fear God to meet frequently and speak often one to another about the things of God and truths of the gospel, if they are not to make use of their own words, to express their sense of these things by them ? — 4s. Indeed, if this is the case as it would be unlawful to speak or write otherwise than in the words of Scripture, so it would be un- lawful to think or conceive in the mind any other than what the Scripture expresses. — 5. In this way, the sentiments of one man in any point of religion cannot be distinguished from those of another, though diametrically opposite ; so an Arian cannot be known from an Athanasian ; both will say, in the words of Scripture, that Christ is the great God, the true God, and over all God blessed for ever ; but without express- ing themselves in their own words, their different sentiments will not be discerned ; the one holding that Christ is a created God, of a like, but not of the same substance with his Father; the other that he is equal with him, of the same n-iture, sub- stance, and glory. — 6. It does not appear that those men who are so strenuous for the use of Scripture-phrases only in ar- ticles of religion, have a greater value for the Scriptures than others ; nay, not so much ; for if we are to form a judgment of them by their sermons and writings, one would think they never read the Scriptures at all, or very little, since they make such an unfrequent us'e of them i you shall scarcely hear a passage of Scripture quoted by them in a sermon, or produ- ced by them in their writings ; more frequently Seneca, Cice- ro, and others ; and it looks as if they thought it very unpolite, and what might serve to disgrace their more refined writings, to fill their performances with them. Xll INTRODUCTION. The subject of the following pages being theology, or wha$ we call divinity, it may be proper to consider the signification and use of the word, and from whence it has its rise. * I say, what we call divinity ; for it seems to be a word, as to the use of it in this subject, peculiar to us ; foreign writers never en- title their works of this kind, corpus vel systema vel medulla divimtatis, a body or system, or marrow of divinity, but corpus vel systema vel medulla theobgix, a body or system or marrow of theology. The word divinitas, from whence our word divinity comes, is only used by La in writers for deity or godhead ; but since custom and use have long fixed the sense cf the word among us, to signify, when used on this subject, a treatise on the science of divine things, sacred truths, and Christian doctrines, taken out of the Scriptures ; we need not scruple the use of it. Theology is a Greek word, and signifies a discourse con- cerning God and things belonging to him ; it was first in use among the heathen poets and philosophers. Lactantius says,* the most ancient writers of Greece were called Theologues ; these were their poets who. wrote of their deities,. and of the genealogies of them. The priests of Delphps, are called by Plutarch,f the Theologues of Delphos. It is from hence now that these words Theology and Theologues have been borrowed, and made use of by Christian writers ; and I see no impropriety in the use of them ; nor should they be thought the worse for their original, no more than other words which come from the same source ; for though these words are used of false deities, and of persons that treat of them ; it follows not but that they may be used, with great propriety, of dis- courses concerning the true God, and things belonging to him, and of those that discourse of them. The first among Chris- tians that has the title of Theologue, or Divine, is St. John, the writer of the book of the Revelation ; for so the inscrip- tion of the book runs, u the Revelation of St. John the Di- vine." Whether this word Theologue, or Divine, was ori« i De Ira c. 11. t £e defect. Orac p. 417. vid. ill. 410, 436. INTRODUCTION. X1U ginally in the inscription of this book, I will not say. These words Theologue and Theology are to be met with frequent- ly in the ancient fathers, in following ages, and in all ages, and in all Chnstian writers to the present times. Upon the whole, it appears that Theology, or Divinity, as we call it, is no other than a science or doctrine concerning God, or a dis- coursing and treating of things relating to him ; and that a Theologue, or a Divine, is one that understands, discourses, and treats of divine things. Natural tneology may be considered either as it was in Adam before the fall, or as in him and his posterity since the fall, Adam, before the fall, had great knowledge of things, divine as well as natural, moral and civil ; he was created in the image of God, which image lay in knowledge, as well as in righteousness and holiness; before he came short of this glory, and lost this image, or at least was greatly impaired and obliterated in him by sin, he knew much of God, of his nature and attributes, of his mind and will, and the worship of him. But this kind of theology appeared with a different aspect in Adam after his fall, and in his posterity j by sin his mind was greatly beclouded, and his understanding darkened ; he lost much of his knowledge of G^d, and of his pcjjfctions, or he could never have imagined that going amongSp trees of the garden would hide him from the presence of God, and secure him from his justice. What a notion must he have of the omnipresence of God? and what also of his omniscience, when he attempted to palliate and cover his sin by the excuse he made ? Of the weakness and insufficiency of natural theo* logy to instruct men in the knowledge of divine things, desti- tute of a divine revelation, more may be said hereafter. Supernatural theology, or what is by pure revelation, may be next considered, in its original rise and progress; and as it has been improved and increased, or has met with checks and obstructions. The state of this theology may be considered as it was from the first appearance of it, after the fall of Adam, to the flood in the times of Noah, or throughout the old worid. What XIV INTRODUCTION. gave rise unto and is the foundation of it, is what God pro- nounced to the serpent: it (the seed of the woman) shallbruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel: these words contain ihe principle articles of Christian theology. This received some further improvement, from the coats of skin the Lord God made aud cloathed our first parents with, an emblem of the justifying righteousness of Christ, and of the garments of salvation wrought out by his obedience, sufferings, and death; signified by slain beasts; and which God puts upon his people, and clothes them with, through his gracious act of imputation. And what serves to throw more light on this evangelical theology, are the sacrifices ordered to be offered up ; and which were types of the sacrifice of Christ ; and par-* ticularly that which was offered up by Abel, who, by faith in the sacrifice of Christ, offered up a more excellent sacrifice than Cain ; which aiso was a lamb, the firstling of his flock, and pointed at the lamb of God, who by his sacrifice takes away the sins of his people. Within this period of time men seem to have increased in light, as to the worship of God, especially public worship ; for in the times of Enos, the grandson of Adam, men began to call upon the name of the Lord, Ihe next^fciod of lime in which supernatural theology- may be trace^fc from the flood, in the times of Noah, to the giving of the laws to Israel, in the times of Moses. The true religion, as it was received from the first man, Adam ; was taught by Noah, and the knowledge of it conveyed to his, posterin , partly in the ministry of the word by him, for he was a preacher of righteousness. The sacrifices he offered were of clean creatures, and were a sweet savour to God, and were typical of the purity of Christ's sacrifice for sin, and of the ac- ceptance of it to God, which is to him a sweet smelling savour. Moreover, the waters of the flood, and the ark in which Noah and his family were preserved, were a type of an evangelical ordinance, the ordinance of baptism; which is an emblem of the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ; by which men are saved ; for Noah and his family going into the ark, where, when the fountains of the great deep were broken up below., INTRODUCTION. XV and the windows of heaven opened above, they were like per- sons covered in water, and immersed in it, and as persons bu- ried ; and when they came out of it, the water being carried off, it was like a resurrection, and as life from the dead; the like figure, or antitype whereunto, the apostle says, even bap- tism, doth also now save us, by the resurrection of Christ Jesus signified thereby, 1 Pet. iii. 21. Likewise the rainbow, the token of the covenant ; which, though not the covenant of grace, yet of kindness and preservation, was an emblem of peace and reconciliation by Christ, the mediator of the covenant of grace; and may assure of the everlasting love of God to his people, and of the immoveableness of the covenant of his peace with them. Moreover, as the gospel was preached unto Abraham, Gal. iii. 8. there is no doubt but that he preached it to others ; and as he had knowledge of the Messiah, who should spring from him, in whom all nations of the earth would be blessed, and who saw his day and was glad ; so his grandson Jacob had a more clear and distinct view of him, as God's salvation, as the Shiloh, the peace-maker and prosperous one, who should come, before civil government was removed from the Jews, and when come, multitudes should be gathered to him, Gen. xlix. 10 — 18. Idolatry within this period first bega among the builders of Babel. The worship of the sun and moon prevailed in the times of Job, in Arabia; who lived about the time of the children of Israel being in Egypt. The next period is from the giving of the law to Israel by iche hand of Moses, to the times of David and the prophets; in which supernatural theology was taught by types; as the passover, the manna, the brazen serpent, and other things ; which were emblems of Christ and his grace: the whole cer- emonial law, all that related to the priests, their garments, and their work and office, had an evangelical signification; it was the J ws gospel: Moses wrote of Christ. According to the Jews there was a divinity-school in the times of Samuel. There were within this time some checks to the true know- ledge and worship of God, by the idolatry of the calf at Sinai; 2V1 INTRODUCTION Baal-peor, on the borders of Moab ; and of Baalim and Ash= taro.h, and other deities* after the death of Joshua, and in the times of the Judges. The period from the times of David, including them, to the Babylonish captivity, abounds with evangelic truths, and doctrines of supernatural theology. The Psalms of David are full of spiritual and evangelic knowledge. And the pro- phets which followed him speak out still more clearly of the incarnation of Christ;, point out the very place where he was to be born, and the country where he would preach the gos- pel, to the illumination of those that sat in darkness. They plainly describe him in his person, his offices, the sufferings he should undergo, and the circumstances of them, and bene- fits arising from them ; they bear witness to the doctrines of pardon of sin through him, and justification by him ; and of his bearing sin, and making satisfaction for it : in short, a scheme of evangelic truths may be deduced from the pro- phetic writings ; and, indeed, the great apostle Paul himself said no other things than what the prophets did. There were some sad revolts from the true God, and his worship, within this compass of time, in the reigns of some of the kings of Israel and Judah. The period from the Babylonish captivity to the times of Christ, finish the Old Testament- dispensation. At the return of the Jews from captivity, who brought no idolatrous wor- ship with them, there was a reformation made by Ezra and Nehemiah, with the prophets of their time; or who quickly followed, as Haggai, Zachariah, and Malachi ; but after the death of these prophets, and the Holy Spirit departed, and there was no more prophecy, supernatural theology began greatly to decline. The sect of the Sadducees, a sort of free-think- ers, rose up ; who said there was no resurrection, nor angel, nor spirit : and the sect of the Pharisees, a sort of free-wiilers, who set up traditions as the rule of men's worship, and which rose to an enormous bigness in the times of Christ, who se- verely inveighed against them ; and which in after-times were compiled and put together in a volume, called, the Misnah? INTRODUCTION. XV11 their traditional, or body of traditions : and this, iri course of time, occasioned a large work finished in Babylon, and from thence called the Babylonian Talmud ; which is their doctri- nal, or body of doctrine j full of fables, false glosses and inter- pretations of Scriptures ; and which is the foundation of the erroneous doctrines and practices of the Jews to this day. The theology of the Pagans, according to themselves, as Scaevola* and Varrof testify, was of three sorts,—!. Mystical, or fabulous, which belonged to the poets, and was sung by them. — 2. Physical, or natural ; which belonged to the philo- sophers, and were studied by them. — 3. Political, or civil, which belonged to princes, priests, and people ; being insti- tuted by the one, exercised by the other, and enjoined on the latter. But to return to supernatural theology, having traced it to the times of Christ : at whose coming, and through whose ministry, and that of his forerunner, and of his Apostles, it revived and lift up its head, and appeared in all its purity, splendpur, and glory. John was a man sent from God, to bear witness to the light that was just rising, even the sun of righteousness, the day-spring from on high; the great light that should lighten those that sat in darkness with a supernatural light j he declared the kingdom of Heaven, or gospel-dispen- sation was at hand, and just ushering in ; and preached the baptism of repentance for the remission of sin, and adminis- tered that gospel-ordinance. u God, who at sundry times and in divers manners, had spoke to the fathers by the pro- phets, now spoke to men by his Son :" Christ, his only be- gotten son, who lay in his bosom, came and declared him ; who and what he was, and what was his mind and will : he brought the doctrines of grace and truth with him ; and spoke such words of grace, truth and wisdom, as never man spoke $ his doctrine was not human, but divine ; it was not his own as man, he received it from his Father, and delivered to his apostles ; who having a commission from him to preach it5 * Apud. Augustin. de Civ. Dei, 1. 4. c. 27. f Apud. lb. 1. 6. c. 5. C XV111 INTRODUCTION. and being qualified for it, with the gifts and graces of his Spirit in great abundance, went into all the world and preached the gospel to every creature ; and diffused the sa- vour of his knowledge in every place. After the holy company of the apostles had ended their lives, and that generation was gone, which was worthy to hear the divine wisdom, then a system of impious error took place, through the deceit of false teachers. The school at Alexandria, from whence came several of the Christian doctors, as Pantsenus, Clemens, Origin, &c. served very much to corrupt the simplicity of the gospel : for though it mended the Platonic philosophy, it marred the Christian doctrine ; and laid the foundation for Arianism and Pelagian- ism, which in after- times so greatly disturbed the church of God. The gospel in its simplicity, through the power of di- vine grace attending it, made its way into the gentile world, in these first centuries, with great success ; and paganism de- creased before it ; and which in the times of Constantine re- ceived a fatal blow in the Roman empire ; and yet by degrees pagan rites and ceremonies were introduced into the Christian church ; and what with them, and errors in doctrine, and other things concurring, made way for the man of sin to ap- pear; and that mystery of iniquity, which had been secretly working from the times of the apostles, to shew its htad openly ; and brought in the darkness of popery upon almost all that bore the Christian name. In the twelfth, thirteenth, and fourteenth centuries, flou- rished a set of men called Schoolmen ; these framed a new sort of divinity, called from them scholastic theology ; the first founder of which some make to be Damascene, among the Greeks and others ; Lanfranc, archbishop of Canterbury, an on^ 'he Latins ; though generally Peter Lombard is reckon- ed the father >f these men. Their theology lay in contenti- ous ard bug >us disputations ; in thorny questions, and subtle d s inuions ; and their whole scheme was chiefly directed to stappbrt antichristiamsm, and the tenets of it ; so that by their means popish darkness was the mure increased, and Christian INTRODUCTION. xiz divinity was banished almost out of the world ; and was only to be found among a few, among the Waldenses and Albi- genses, and the inhabitants of the valleys of Piedmont, and some particular persons and their followers, as Wickliff, John Huss, and Jerom of Prague ; and so things continued till the reformation begun by Zuinglius and Luther, and car- ried on by others; by whose means evangelical light was spread through many nations in Europe. By many the doctrines of pure revelation are almost explo- ded, and some are endeavouring to bring us, as fast as they can, into a state of paganism, only somewhat refined. Almost all the old heresies are revived, under a fond and foolish no- tion of new light; when thty are no other than what have been confuted over and over. When men leave the sure word, the only rule of faith and practice, and follow their own fan- cies, and the dictates of their carnal minds, they must needs go wrong. Let us, therefore, search the Scriptures, to see whether doctrines advanced are according to them or not. I have but little reason to think the following Work will meet with a favourable reception in general ; yet if it may be a means of preserving sacred truths, of enlightening the minds of any into them, or of establishing them in them, I shall not be concerned at what evil treatment I may meet with from the adversaries of them ; and be it as it may, I shall have the satisfaction of having done the best I can for the promoting truth ; and of bearing a testimony to it. BOOK I. OF GOD, HIS WORD, NAMES, NATURE, PERFECTIONS, AND PERSONS. OF THE BEING OF GOD. SOME, because the Being of God is a first principle:, not to be disputed ; and because that ti *j one is a self-ev- ident proposition, not to be disproved j have thought it should not be admitted as a matter of debate :* but since such is the malice of Satan, as to suggest the contrary to the minds of men; and such the badness of some wicked men ss to listen to it, and imbibe it ; and such the weakness of some good men as to be harassed and distressed with doubt? about it, at times ; it cannot be improper to endeavour to fortfy our minds with reasons and arguments against such suggestions and insinuations. My first argument to prove the Being of a God, shall be taken from the general consent of men of all nations, in all ages of the world ; among whom, the belief of it has universally ob- tained, which it is not reasonable to suppose would have obtain- ed, if it was not true. Aristotle says,f all men have a per- suasion of Deity, or hat there is a God. Cicero observes,:): * So Aristotle says, every problem and proposition is not to be disputed; they that doubt whether God is to be worshipped, and parents loved, are to- be punished, and not disputed with. Topic: LI. c 9. f De Coelo,l. 1. c.3, ^Tusculan. Qusest. 1.1. o. 13. 22 OF THE BEING OF GOD. " There is no nation so wild and savage, whose minds are not imbued with the opinion of the gods; many entertain wrong notions of them ; but all suppose and own the divine power and nature." To the same sense are the words of Seneca, " There never was a nation so dissolute and abandoned, so lawless and immoral, as to believe there is no God." Plu- tarch* has these remarkable words, "If you go over the earth, says he, you may find cities without walls, letters, kings, houses, wealth, and money, devoid of theatres and schools ; but a city without temples and gods, and where is no use of prayers, oaths, and oracles, nor sacrifices to obtain good or avert evil, no man ever saw." In the first ages of the world, men universally believed in the true God, and worshipped him as Adam and his sons, and their posterity, until the flood ; nor dees there appear any trace of idolatry before it, nor for some time after. The sins which caused that, and with which the world was filled, seem to be lewdness and uncleannessr rapine and violence. As men were remote from those among whom the true worship of God was preserved; they, by de- grees los; sight of the true God, and forsook his worship ; and this beingthe case, they began to worship the sun in his stead, and which led on to the worship of the moon, and the host of heaven. I\ appears also that men took very early to the dei- fying of thei- heroes after death, their kings, great personages, either for tleir wisdom and knowledge, or for their cour- age and valour, and marshal exploits and other things; such were the Bel or Belus, of the Babylonians; the Baal-peor of the Moabites; the Moloch" of the Phoenicians; and other Baal- im, lords, or kings, mentioned in the scriptures : and such were Saturn, JupXer, Mars, Mercury, Hercules; and the rest of the rabble of the heathen deities. As for the gentiles, they worshipped almost every thing; not only the sun, moon, and stars; but the earth, fire, and water; and various sorts of ani- mals, as oxen, goats, and swine ; cats and dogs ; the fishes of the river*, the river-horse, and the crocodile, those amphibious creatures; the fowls of the air, as the hawk, stork, and ibis; and even insects, as the fly ; yea, creeping things, as serpents, * Adv. Colotem, vol. 2. p. 1125. Book I. OF THE BEING OF GOD* 23 the beetle, 8cc. as also vegetables, onions, and garlic; which occasioned the satirical* poet to say, 0 sanctas gtnies, quibus hcec nascuntur hi hortis, numina ! O holy nations, -whose gods are born in their gardens ! Some have worshipped the devil himself. I am sensible that to this it is objected, thai there have been at different times, and in different countries, some particular personsf who have been reckoned atheists, deniers of the be- ing of a God. But some of these men were only deriders of the gods of their country; others were so accounted, br cause they excluded the gods from any concern with human affairs 5 but th^se men were not deniers of the existence of God, only of his providence as to the affairs of the world : and others have been rather practical than speculative atheists, as the fool, in Ps. xiv. 1. Indeed, all men in anunregenerated state, be they Jews or Gentiles, or live where they may, are atheists; as the apostle calls them, Eph. ii. 12. they are, " without God in the world, being alienated from the life of Gud," ch. iv. 18. The second argument shall be taken from the law and light of nature ; or from the general instinct in men, or impress of Deity on the mind of every man. Senecaf makes use of this to prove there is a God ; " because, says he, an opinion or sense of deity, is implanted in the minds of all men." There are some, indeed, who deny there are any innate ideas in the minds of men, and particularly concerning God : but to such writers and reasoners I pay but little regard ; when the inspi- red apostle assures us, that even the Gentiles, destitute of the law of Moses, have the zvork of the law written hi their hearts^ Rom. ii. 15. which, as it regards duty to God, as well as man, necessarily supposes the knowledge of him; as well as of the difference between good and evil, as founded upon his nature and will. If it was the contrivance of politicians to keep men in awe, and under subjection, it must be the contrivance of one man, or more united together. If of one, say, who is the "Juvenal. Satyr. 15. v. 10. f Plutarch de Placitis Philosopb. 1. \ Utsupra. 24 OF THE BEING OF GOD. man ? in what age he lived, and where ? If of more, say when and where they existed ? Under this head may be observed the innate desires of men after happiness, which are so boundless as not to be sa- tisfied ; these desires are not in vain implanted, there must be an object answerable unto them ; a perfect Being, which is no other than God, who is the first cause and last end of all things, of which the Psalmist says, Whom have I in heaven but thee f and there is none on earth my soul desires besides thee. Psalm lxxiii. 25. The third argument, proving the Being of God, shall be taken from the works of creation ; concerning which the apos- tle says, the invisible things of God, from the creation of the world, are clearly seen ; being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead, Rom. i. 20. Most admirable was the reasoning of a wild Greenlander,* which he declared to a missionary to be the reasoning of his mind before his conversion ; " It is true, said he to him, we were ignorant heathens, and knew nothing of God, or a Sa- viour ; and, indeed, who should tell us of him till you came? but thou must not imagine that no Greenlander thinks about these things. I myself have often thought : a kajak (a boat) with all its tackle and implements, does not grow into exist- ence of itself, but must be made by the labour and ingenuity of man; and one that does not understand it, would directly spoil it. Now, the meanest bird has far more skill displayed in its structure, than the best kajak ; and no man can make a bird : But there is still a far greater art shewn in the forma- tion of a man, than of any other creature. Who was it that made him ? I bethought me that he proceeded from his pa- rents, and they from their parents ; but some must have been the first parents ; whence did they come ? common report in- forms me, they grew out of the earth : but if so, why does it not still happen that men grow out of the earth ? and from whence did this same earth itself, the sea, the sun, the moon, ** Crantz's History of Greenland. Book I. OF THE BEING OF GOD. 25 and stars, arise into existence ? Certainly there must be some Being who made all these things; a Bting that always was, and can never cease to be. He must be inexpressibly more might), knowing, and wise, than the wisest man. He must be very good loo, because that every thing that he has madejs good, useful, and necessary for us. Ah, did I but know him, now would I love him and honour him! But who has seen him? who has ever conversed with him ? None of us poor men. Y'.t there may be men too that know something of him. O that I could but speak with such ! therefore, said he, as soon as ever I heard you speak ol this great Being, I be- lieved it directly, with all my heart ; because I had so long desired to hear it." A glaring proof this, that a supreme Being, the first cause of all things, is to be concluded from the works of creation. There is nothing in the whole creation the mind can contemplate, the eye look upon, or the hand lay hold on, but what proclaims the Being of God. Galen, an ancient noted phvsician, being atheistically inclined, was con- vinced of his impiety by barely considering the admirable structure of the eye ; its various humours, tunics, and provi- sion for its defence and safety. But the sou! of man, the more noble part of him, more fully discovers the original au- thor of him ;* being possessed of such powers and faculties that none but God could give. The fourth argument will be taken from the sustentation and government of the world ; the provision made for the sup- ply of creatures, and especially of man, and for his safety. As the world is made by a divine Being, so by him it consists. Was there not such an almighty Being, " who upholds all things by the word of his power," they would sink and fall. Did he not bear up the pillars of the earth, they would trem- ble and shake, and not be able to bear its weight; as he that built all things is God, so he that supports the fabric of the universe must be so too ; no less than an almighty hand can preserve and continue it: and which has done it, without any * So Plato proves the Eeing of God from the soul of man, de Leg'ibus, p. 998. 26 OF THE BEtNG OF GOD. visible appearance of age or decay, for almost six thousand years. The earth produces a variety of things for food and drink ; and of others for medicine, for the continuance of health, and restoration of it. The certain and constant revo- lutions of " summer and winter, seed-time and harvest;" as well as night and day, cold and h. at, cannot be attributed to any thing else than the superintendency of the divine Being. The fifth argument may be taken from the uncommon he- roic actions, prodigies, wonders, and miraculous things done in the world ; which cannot be thought to be done without a superior and divine influence. Heroic actions, such as that of Shamgar, who fought with and killed six hundred Philistines with an ox-goad : and of Sampson, who slew a thousand of them with the jaw-bone of an ass. If scripture is only re* garded as a common history, these merit our notice and credit, as any of the relations in profane history ; in which are recorded the magnanimous actions of heroes, kings, and ge* nerals of armies ; their wonderful successes, and amazing con- quests ; all which can never be supposed to be done without superior power, and the overruling, influencing providence of the divine Being. The miracles of Moses and the prophets, and of Christ and his apostles, were not done to prove a divine Bung ; yet they necessarily suppose one, by whose power alone they are performed. The sixth argument may be formed from the prophecies of contingent future events, and the exact fulfilment of them. Instances of which there are many in the sacred writings ; prophecies which relate both to particular persons and to whole kingdoms and states ; which have had their exact ac- complishment. Divination is said to be confirmed by the consent of all nations. If there is a foretelling of future things, which certainly come to pass, there must be a God ; since none but an omniscient Being can, with certainty, foretel what shall come to pass. The seventh argument may be urged from the fears of men, and the tortures of a guilty conscience, and the dread of Book I. OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES. 27 a future state. Some are terribly affrighted at thunder and lightening, as Caligula, the Roman emperor, ustd to be, who, at such times, would hide himself in, or under, his bed ; and yet this man set himself up for a god. Many have been so terrified in their consciences on account of sin, that the) could get no rest any where, or by any means : as Cain, under the terrors of an evil conscience, fancied that " every one that found him would slay him :" and those wicked traitors, Cati- line and Jugurtha ; Tiberius and Nero. Now, what do all these fears and tortures of conscience arise from, but from the guilt of sin, and a sense of a divine Being; who is above men, and will call them to an account for their sins, and take ven- geance on them ? The eighth and last argument shall be taken from the judg- ments in the world; not only famine, sword, pestilence, earth- quakes, &c. but such that have been inflicted on wicked men, atheistical persons, perjured ones, blasphemers, and the like. The universal flood — the burning of Sodom and Gomorrah— the awful instances of Herod being smitten by an angel ; and of Ananias and Sapphira, being struck dead ; are instances of judgments. The same, or a lik<= kind, have occurred in all agesand countries. Who now can hear or read such awful judgments, and disbelieve tfyS Being of God? OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES- BY the Scriptures, I understand the books of the Old and of the New Testament. These books are commonly called Ca- nonical Scripture, because they have always been received by the church into the canon, or rule of faith. These are the books which the apostle calls, all Scripture, or the whole of Scrip- ture, said by him to be given by inspiration of God. I shall, I. Observe the divine authority of the Scriptures, or shew, that they are from God, or inspired by him ; they lay in a 28 OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES. claim to a divine original ; and the claim is just, as will be seen. The Prophets frequently introduce their prophecies and discourses, by saying, The xvord of the Lord came to them ; and with a, Thus saith the Lord, Isa. i. 10. Jer. ii. 1, 2. And our Lord expressly calls the scripture the word of God, John x. 35. Before I proceed any further, in the proof of the divi- nity of the sacred Scriptures, I shall premise the following things; i. That when we say that the Scriptures are the word of God, or that this word is of God ; we do not mean that it was all spoken with an articulate voice by him ; or written imme- diately by the finger of God. The penmen wrote as they were directed, dictated, and inspired by him, and "spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost." ii. Not all that is contained in the scriptures is of God. Some are the words of others ; yea, some are the speeches of Satan. There are also speeches of bad men, as of Cain, Paa- roah, and others, ordered to be written, to discover the more the corruption of human nature : and even of good men, as of Moses, David, Jonah, and particularly the friends of Job. In the writings and discourses of the apostle Paul, are several quo- tations out of heathen authors j one out of Aratus, when he was discoursing before the wise men at Athens; ascertain, says lie, of your own potts hjve sa:d, for we are also his offspring, Acts xvii. 28. Another out of Menander; Evil communications corrupt good manners, i Cor. xv. 33. And another out of Epi- menides, a poet of Crete, a testimony of his against the Cre- tians, w|jg. s«»id they were, always liars, evil beasts, slow bellies. in. Let it we observed, that not the matter of the scriptures only, but the very words in which the}' are written, are of God. This may be confirmed from the testimonies of the writers themselves: says David, one of the writers of the Old Testa- ment, The spirit of the Lord spake by me, dfid his word was in my tongue, 2 Sam. xxiii. 2; And the apostle Paul speaks of himself, and other inspired apostles of the New Testament, Wh'ch things, says he, zvc speak, not in the words which man's wisdom tcachctht but which the Holy Ghost teachelh^ i Cor. ii. Book I. OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES. 29 13. and it is the writing, or the word of God as written, that is by inspiration a/Gody 2 Tim. ill. 16. But then, iv. This is to be understood of the scriptures, as in the original languages in which they were written, and not of trans- lations. Let not any be uneasy in their minds about transla- tions on this account, because they are not upon an equality with the original text, and especially about our own; when ever a set of men have been engaged in this work, as were in our nation, men well skilled in the languages, and partakers of the grace of God; of sound principles, and of integrity and faithfulness, having the fear of God before their eyes ; they have never failed of producing a translation worthy of accep- tation ; and in which, though they have mistook some words and phrases, and erred in some lesser and ligher matters ; yet not so as to affect any momentous article of faith or practice ; and therefore such translations as ours may be regarded as the rule of faith. Here I cannot but observe the amazing ignorance and stu- pidity of some persons, who take it into their heads to decry learning and learned men ; for what would they have done for a Bible, had it not been for them as instruments? Bless God, and be thankful that God has, in his providence, raised up such men to translate the Bible into the mother tongue of every nation, and particularly into ours. i. From the subject-matter of them — I. In general there is nothing in them unworthy of God; nothing contrary to any of the perfections of his nature; no falshood nor contradiction in them ; nothing impious or impure, absurd or ridiculous in them; as in the Al-koran of Mahomet; or as in the Pagan treatises of their gods. 2. The things contained in the Scrip- tures are pure and holy : the holy Spirit dictated them, holy men spoke and wrote them, and they are justly called holy Scriptures, Rom. i. 2. and plainly shew they came from the holy God. Hence it is that there is in natural men, whose carnal minds are enmity to God, such a backwardness, yea, an aversion to reading the Scriptures. 3. There are some things recorded in the Scriptures, which could never have 30 OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES. been known but by revelation from God himself; as particu- larly with respect to the creation of the world, and the origi- nal of mankind ; the choice of men in Christ to everlasting sal- vation, the council held between the divine persons, concern- ing the salvation of man ; all which could never have been known unless God himself had revealed them. 4. There are some things recorded in the Scriptures as future, which God only could foreknow would be, and foretei with certainty that they should be ; and which have accordingly come to pass, and proves the revalation to be of God. Some of them relate to particular persons, and contingent events ; as Josiah, David, and Cyrus. Others relate to kingdoms and states, and what should befal them ; as the Egyptians, Moabite,% Ammonites, Edomites, Assyrians, Babylonians, and others, especially the prophecies concerning Christ, are peculiarly worthy of notice. 5. i'here are some things in the Scriptures, which, though not contrary to reason, yet are above the capacity of men ever to have made a discovery of: as the Trinity of persons in the Godhead ; &c. 6. The things contained in the scriptures> whether doctrines or facts, are harmonious; though delivered at sundry times, and in divers manners, as to historical facts, what seeming contiadicrions may be observed in any of them are easily reconciled, wi h a little care, diligence, and study, and even these instances are but few, and not ver;y material; and which never affect any article of faith or practice : such care has divine providence taken of these peculiar and im- portant writings. ii. The stile and manner in which the Scriptures are writ* ten, is a further evidence of their divine original ; the majesty in which they appear, the auihonuuive manner in which they are delivered; not asking, but demanding, attention and assent Unto them ; the sublimity of the stile is such as exceeds all other writings : the book of job, and the prophecies of Isaiah are fraught with a rich treasure of divine elocution: it is re- markable that in some of the inspired writers, who have been bred up in a rustic manner, are found some of the most grand images, and lively picturesques, and highest flights of language, as in Amos the herdman, chap. iv. 13. and ix. 2. 6. Book I. OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES. 31 in. Another argument for the divine authority of the Scrip- tures, may be taken from the penmen and writers of them. — i. Many of these were men of no education, in a low station of life ; what they wrote, both as to matter and manner, were above and beyond their ordinary capacities, and could not be of themselves. 2. They lived in different times and places, and were of different interests and capacities, and in different conditions and circumstances; yet they all speak and write the same things. 3. They were holy and good men. 4. They appear to be plain, honest, and faithful men. 5. Thev were dis- interested men. Moses, when it was offered to him, by the Lord, to make of him a great nation, and cut off the people of Israel for their sins, refused it more than once; preftring the public good of that people, to his own advantage. The apostles of Christ, sought not the wealth of men, no** honour from them ; but on the contrary, exposed themselves to re- proach, poverty, vexation, and trouble ; yea, to persecution, and death itself. In short, the writers of the Scriptures seem to be men that neither could be imposed upon themselves, nor sought to impose on others. iv. Another argument may be drawn from the many won- derful effects the sacred writings, attended with a divine power and influence, have had upon the hearts and lives of men. Every good man has a testimony within himself of its divine authority, see 1 John v. 9, 10. v. The testimony bore to the Scriptures by miracles, abun- dantly confirm the genuineness of them,. and that they are of God; such as were done by Moses and the prophets of the Old Testament, and by the apostles of the New ; these God would never do to establish the character of impostors, or to confirm a lie. vi. The hatred and opposition of men and the enmity of devils, to them, afford no inconsiderable argument in favour of the divinity of than : by these are to be known the spirit of truth, and the spirit m error ; what is of the world, and merely human, is approved by the men of the world; but what is of God, is rejected, 1 John iv. 5, 6. 32 OF THE HOLY SCR^PTURElS. vii. The awful judgment of God on such as have despi- sed them, and have endeavoured to destroy them, are no mean evidence that they are of God ; the instance of Antiochus Ep- iphanes, king of Syria, and of Dioclesian, the Roman emperor : the one shewed a despite to tht books of the old Testament, the other more especially to the books of the New Testament; and both were highly resented bv the divine Being, who here- by shewed himself the author of both. vin. The antiquity and continuance of these writings may be improved into an argument in favour of them : Tenullian says, " That which is most ancient, is most rue." The most early of heathen writings excant, are the poems of Homer and Hesiod, who flourished about the times of Isaiah; the divine writings have been preserved notwithstanding the malice of men and devils* some of them some thousand of years, when other writings are lost and perished. To which may be added, that the Scriptures receive no small evidence of the authority of them, from the testimonies of many heathen writers agreeing with them, with respect to the chronology, geography, and history of them. I go on to consider. II. The perfection of the Scriptures. They relate all things necessary to salvation, every thing that ought to be believed and done \ and are a complete, perfect standard of faith and practice : which may be proved. i. From the author of them who is God ? God is a perfect Being in whom is no darkness of ignorance, error, and imper- fection ; they coming from him, must be free from every thing of that kind. ii. Fr^m the name they go by, a Testament. A man's tes- tament, or will, contains the whole of his will and pleasure, concerning the disposition of his estate. in. From the epithet of perfect, being expressly given unto them ; 1 he law of the Lord is ferfect, P&al. xix. 7. iv. From the essential parts of them, the Law and Gospel ; to which two heads the substance' of them may be reduced, the Law is a perfect rule of duty ; it contains what is the good, BookL OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES* 33 acceptable, and perfect will of God, Rom. xii. 2. The Gospel is the perfect law, or doctrine of liberty, the apostle James speaks of, chap. i. 25. which proclaims the glorious liberty of the children of God b\ Christ; and it is perfect. v. From the integral parts of them: the Scriptures, con- taining all the books that were written by divine inspiration. Whatever mistakes may be made, through the carelessness of transcribers of copies^ they are to be corrected by other copies, which God, in his providence, has preserved; and, as it seems, for uch purposes : so that we have a perfect canon, or rale of faith and practice. vi. This may be further evinced from the charge that is given, 4t not to add unto, nor diminish from, any part of the sacred writings, law, or gospel:" Deut. iv* 2. and xii. 32* Rev. xxii. 18, 19. Now if there is nothing superfluous in the Scriptures, to be taken from them ; and nothing defective in them, which rqeuires any addition to them : then .they must be perfect. vii. This may be argued from the sufficiency of them to answer the ends and purposes for which thev are written. As, for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, and for instruction in righteousness, 2 Tim. iii. 16. There is no sp ritual truth, nor evangelical doctrine, but what they contain* There is not a sin that can be named, but what the Scriptures inveigh against, forbid, and correct. They instruct in every thing of a moral or positive nature, and direct to observe all that is commanded of God and Christ; and now wridngs by which such ends are answered, must needs be perfect and compleat- viii. The Scriptures are able to make a man wise unto salvation, 2 Tim. iii. 15. In short, the Scriptures contain all things in them necessary to be believed, unto salvation ; and, indeed, they are written for this end, that men might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing,, they might have -life throv^h his name, John xx. 31. I pro- ceed, III. To prove the perspicuity of the Scriptures; not that they are all equally clear and plain ; some parts of them, E 34 OP THE HOLY SCRIPTURES. and some things in them, are dark and obscure ; but then by comparing spiritual things with spiritual, or those more dark pasbages with those that are clearer, they may be plainly un- derstood. They are like a full and deep river, in which th^ lamb may walk, and the elephant swim, in different places. The perspicuity of the Scriptures may be urged — 1. From the author of them, the Father of lights. — 2. From the several parts of them, and wh^t they are compared unto. The law, or legal part of them, is represented by things which are light, Prov. vi. 23. The evangelical part of the Scriptures, or the gospel, is compared to a glass, in which may be clearly beheld, the glory of the Lord. — 3. From other testimonies of Scrip, ture, particularly from Deut. xxx. 11. 14. Rom.x. 6 — 8. The whole of Scripture is a light that shineth in a dark place — 4. From exhortations to all sorts of people to read them and who are commended for so doing, Deut. xvii. 19. John v. 39. Acts xvii. 11. Rev. i. 3 — 5. From all sorts of persons being capable of reading them, and hearing them read, so as to un- derstand them. Believers, and regenerate persons of every rank and degree, have knowledge of them, whether fathers, young men, or little children, 1 John ii. 12 — 14. Nor is the public preaching of the word, and the necessity of it, to be objected to all this; since that is, as for conversion, so for greater edification and comfort, and for establishment in the truth, even though it is known ; and besides, it serves to lead into a larger knowledge of it, and is the ordinary means of guiding into it, and of arriving to a more perfect acquaintance with it, 1 Cor. xiv. 3. 2 Pet: 1. 12. Acts viii. 30, 31. kph. iv. 11 13. So that it may be concluded, upon the whole, that the Scriptures are a sure, certain, and infallible rule to go by, with respect to things both to be believed and done. The only certain and infallible rule of faith and practice. And, IV. There seems to be a real necessity of such a rule in the present state of things. Nothing else was, and nothing less than the Scriptures are, a sufficient rule and guide in matters of religion ; even not the light of nature and reason, so much Book I. OF THE HOLY SCRIPTURES. 35 talked of, and so highly exalted. Let one of the most exalted genius be pitched upon, one of the wisest and sagest philoso- phers of the Gentiles, that has studied nature most, and arri- ved to the highest pitch of reason and good sense ; for instance, let Socrates be the man, who is sometimes magnified as di- vine, and in whom the light of nature and reason may be thought to be sublimated and raised to its highest pitch, and yet it must be a very deficient rule of faith and practice ; for he himself bewails the weakness and darkness of human rea- son, and confessed the want of a guide. The light of nature and reason considered in large bodies of men, in whole na- tions, will appear not to be the same in all. The insufficiency thereof, as a rule and guide in religion, will further appear by considering the following particulars. i. That there is a God may be known by the light of na- ture ; but who and what he is, men, destitute of a divine re- velation, have been at a loss about. Multitudes have gone into polytheism, and have embraced for gods almost every thing in and under the heavens ; not only the sun, moon, and stars, and mortal men have they deified ; but various sorts of beasts, fishes, fowl, creeping things, and even forms of such that never existed. ii. Though the light of nature may teach men that God, their Creator and Benefactor, is to be worshipped by them, yet a perfect plan of worship, acceptable to God, could never have been formed according to that ; hence the Gentiles, left to that, and without a divine revelation, have introduced modes of worship the most absurd and ridiculous, as well as cruel and bloodv. in. By the light of nature men may know that they are not in the same condition and circumstances they originally were ; but in what state they were made, and how they fell from that estate, and came into the present depraved one, they know not ; and still less how to get out of it, and to be cured of their irregularities. iv. Though, as the apostle savs, the Gentiles without the law, do by nature the things contained in the lazv ; and are a law 36 OF THE KOLY SCRIPTURES. to themselves, which shew the work of the lazv written on then hearts .• their consciences also bearing witness, and the?r thoughts the mean while accusing, or else excusing one another •, Rom. it. 14, 15. and so have some notion of the difference between moral good and evil ; yet this is not so clear and ex- tensive, but that some of the greatest moralists among them, gave into the most notorious vices. v. Though in many cases reason taught them that certain vices were disagreeable to God ; how to reconcile him to them and recommend themselves to his favour, they were quite ignorant ; and therefore took the most shocking and de- testable methods for it, as human sacrifices, and particularly, burning their innocent infants. vi. Men mav,by the light of nature, have some notion of sin as an offence to God, and of their need of forgiveness from him hut then they cannot be certain of it from thence, or that even God will pardon sin at all, the sins of any man ; and still less how this can be done consistent with his holiness and justice. vn. The light of nature leaves men entirely without the Icnmvk dge of the way of salvation by the Son of God. Some have thought that Socrates had some notion of it; who is made to say,* " It is necessary to wait till some one teaches how to behave towards God and men." vm. The light of nature is far from giving any clear and certain account of the immortality of the soul, the resurrection of the body, and a future state of happiness and misery; as for the immortality of the soul, the heathens rather wished it to be true than were fully satisfied of it. In what a low man- ner do they represent the happiness of the future state ; by walking in pleasant fields, by sitting under fragrant bowers, and cooling shades, and by shelter from inclement weather ; bv viewing flowing fountains, and purling streams ; by carnal mirth, feasting, music, and dancing: and the misery of it, by being bound neck and heels together, or in chains, or fastened to rocks, and whipped by furies, with a scourge of serpents, or doomed to some laborious service. But not the least hint is given of the presence of God with the one, nor of his absence * Plato in Alcibiad. 2. p. 459. Book I. OF THE NAMES OF GOD. 37 from the other. Let us therefore bless God that we have a better rule and guide to go by ; " a more sure word of pro- phecy to take heed unto:" let us have constant recourse unto it, as the standard of faith and practice ; and try everv doc- trine and practice by it, and believe and act as that directs vis, and fetch every thing from it that may be for our good, and the glory of God. OF THE NAMES OF GOD. Properly speaking, since God is incomprehensible, he is not nominable ; and being but one, he has no need of a name to distinguish him ; and therefore Plato says he has no name. So when Moses asked the Lord, what he should say to the children of Israel, should they ask the name of him that sent him to them, he bid him say, I am that I am; that is, The eternal Being, the Being of beings ; nevertheless, there are names of God in the scriptures taken from one or other of his attributes, which are worthy of consideration. The names of God, as Zanchy* observes, some of them respect him as the subject, as Jehovah, Lord, God: others are predicates, what are spoken of him, or attributed to him, as holy, just good, &c. Some respect the relation the divine persons in the Godhead stand to each other, as Father, Son, and Spirit : others the relation of God to the creatures ; and which are properly said of him, and not them, as Creator, Preserver, Governor, &c. some are common to the three divine Persons, as Jehovah, God, Father, Spirit; and some peculiar to each, as the epithets of unbegotten, begotten, proceeding from the Father and the Son : some are figurative and metaphorical, taken from creatures, to whom God is compared ; and others are proper names, by which he either calls himself, or is called by the prophets and Apostles, in the books of the Old and New Testament, * De Natura Dei, 1. 1. c. 4, 38 OP THE NAMES OF GOD. i. EJohim is the first name of God we meet with in Scrip- ture, and is translated God. Gen. i. i. and is most frequently used throughout the whole Old Testament ; sometimes, in- deed, improperly of creatures, angels, and men, and of false deities, P.sal. viii. 5. and lxxxii. 1, 6. Jer. x. 11. but properly only of God. The word Elohim may be derived from a word in the Ara- bic language, which signifies to worship, as is thought by many learned men*; and so is a fit name for God, who is the sole ob- ject of religious worship and adoration. It is a word of the plural number, and though it has a singular, which it some- times used, yet it is most frequently in this form ; and being joined with a verb singular, as in Gen. i. i. it is thoughtf to denote a plurality of persons in the unity of the divine essence. ii. Another name of God is El; and which may be ob- served in the word Beth-el, which signifies, The House of God, Gen. xii. 7, 8, Both the singular and plural, El Elim, the God of gods, are used in Dan. xi. 36. and the word is left untrans- lated in Mat. xxvii. 46. Eli, Eli ; my God, my God. It is ex- pressive of the power of God. in. The next name of God we meet with is Elion, the most high, Gen. xiv. 18 — 22. So Christ is called The son of the Highest, and the Spirit, the power of the Highest, Luke i. 32, 35. and which name God has either from his habitation, the highest heavens, Isai. lvii. 15. or from his superiority, power, and dominion over all creatures, or from the sublimity of his nature and essence, which is out of the reach of finite minds, and is incomprehensible, Job xi. 7, 8. It is expressive of the supremacy of God. iv. Another name of God is, Shaddai : under this name God appeared to Abraham, Gen. xvii. i. and to which refe- rence is had, Exod. vi. 3. we translate it Almighty in both places, and in all others. Some choose to render it sufficient, * Stockii Clavis S. Ling. p. 61. Hottingeri Smegma Oriental . 1 I.e. 8 p. 123. Schultensin Job i. 1. Noldius, No. 1093. Alting Dissert. 4. tie plural. Elohim, p* 177. f Schindler. Lexic. Penlaglott. col 78. Book I. OF THE NAMES OF GOD. 39 or all-sufficient* God. Others render it Nourisherf ; deriving it from a word which signifies a breast ; HillerusJ, derives it from a word which signifies to pour out, or shed; and it well agrees with God, who pours forth, or sheds his blessings, ia great plenty, on his creatures ; and which flow from him as from a fountain: though others give a very different etymolo- gy of it; deriving it from a wrord which signifies to destrov; to whichthsr e seems to be a beautiful allusion in Isai. xiii. 6. u Destruction from Shaddai, the destroyer." And some render the word, the Darter, or Thunderer :|| whose darts are his thunderbolts. Job vi. 4. This name seems to be ex- pressive of the all sufficiency of God, and of the supply of his creatures from it. v. Another of the names of God is, the Lord, or God of hosts; it is first mentioned in 1 Sam. i. 3. 11. but frequently after- wards ; and is left untranslated in James v. 4. where the Lord is called, the Lord of Sabaoth, not Sa lath, as it is sometimes wrongly understood ; and as if it was the same with Lord of Sab: ath, Matt. xii. 8. for though the words are somewhat alike in sound, thei are very different in sense; for Sabbath signifies rest, and Sabaoth host or armies. The Lord is the Gcd of armies on earth ; he is the Lord of the hosts of the starrv heavens; the sun, moon, and stars, called the host of heaven, Gen. ii. 1. and also of the airy heavens ; and the lo- custs that fly there arc his army, Joel ii. 7, 11. and the mete- ors, thunder and^^htening, snow and hail : the angels also are the militia oWfcaven, and are called the heavenly host, Luke ii. 13. This name is expressive of God's domin- ion overall his creatures, and the several armies of them. vi. Another name of God is Adonai, or Adon, Gen. xv. 2. and is commonly rendered Lord. Hence the Spanish word don for Lord. God is so calted, because he is the Lord of the whole earth, Zech. iv 14. Adon is used in the plural num- ber of God, Mai. i. 6. and so Adonai is used of the Son, as • So Cocceius in Lex. col. 859. Jarchi in Gen. xvii. 1. Maimon. Morch Ne- vochim. par. 1. c. 63. t P^chii. Dissert, de Selah, p. 2. s. 6. ^Oncmast. Sacr. p. 260, 261. (| So Schmidt in Job vi. 4 40 OF THE NAMES OF GOD. well as of the father, Psal- cxi. 1. and of the holy Spirit, Isai. vi. 8, compared with Acts xxviii. 25. Hence Adonis, with the heathens, the same with the sun, their chief deity, accord- ing to Macrobius,* by whom Bacchus is calledf Ebon, or ra- the? Edon ; who, he says', is also the same with the sun. vn. The famous name of God is Jehovah ; this is a name he takes to himself, and claims it, Exod, vi. 3. IsaL xlii. 8. and is peculiar to him ; his name alone is Jehovah, and in- communicable to another, Psal. lxxxiii. 18. The Jews of a su- perstitious abuse of it, assert it to be ineffable, and not to be pronounced, and even not to be read and written, and there- fore substitute other names instead of it, as Adonai, and Elo- him. The words of the evangelist John are a proper peri- phrasis of it ; which is, and -which was, and which is to come, Rev. i. 4: or, shall be, as in chap. xvi. 5. vui. Jah is another name of God, which is mentioned in IPsal. Ixviii. 4. and ch 6. Isai. xxvi. 4. though it may be only an abbreviation or contraction of the word Jehovah, and may signify the same. ix. Ejeh is a name of God given as a name of his to Moses, when he sent him to the children of Israel; and translated ll AM that I A M, Exod. iii 13, 14. and may be rendered, / shall be what I shall bey and what I have been. It seems to be of the same signification wi.h Jehovah, and to be derived from the same word, our Lord has a manifest respect unto it, iwhen he says, Before Abraham was Iam,lmhn viii. 58. x. The names of God in the New Tcsiment are two, one is usually rendered Lord and the other God. From these names of God we learn that God is the eternal, immutable, and almighty Being, the Being of beings, self-ex- istent, and self-sufficient, and the object of religious worship &nd adoration. * Saturn al. 1. 1. c. 21. t IWd- c- 1S- OF THE NATURE OF GOD. There is a nature that belongs to every creature, which is difficult to understand : and so to God, the Creator, which is most difficult of all. Mention is made of ihe divine Nature, 2 Pet. i. 4. This is what is called Divinity, Deitv, or God- head j and which is to be seen and understood by the visi- ble works of creation, and is what, *c in all its perfection and fulness, dwells bodily in Christ." Acts xvii. 29. We are required to believe that he is, that he has a being of essence, and does exist, Heb. xi. 6. Essence is that by which a person or thing is what it is, that is its nature ; and with re- spect to God, it is the same with his face, which cannot be seen, Exod. xxxiii. 20,23. It is impossible for a finite mind in its most exalted state, to comprehend the infinite Nature and Being of God. This nature is common to the three Persons in God, but not communicated from one to another ; they each of them partake of it, and possess it as one undivided nature ; they all enjoy it. I know it is represented by some, who, otherwise, are sound in the doctrine of the Trinity, that the divine nature is communicated from the Father to the Son and Spirit, and that he is Jons Deitatis, the fountain of Deity ; which I think are unsafe phrases. It is better to say, that they are self-ex- istent, and exist together in the same undivided essence ; and jointly, equally, and as early one as the other, possess the same nature. The nature of God is, indeed, incomprehensible by us; somewhat of it may be apprehended, but it cannot be fully comprehended ; Canst thou by searching find out God? Canst thou find out the Almighty into perfection P Job xi. 7. No : but then this does not forbid us searching and enquiring after him. An heathen philosopher being asked this question, F 42 OF THE NATURE OF G€>». What God was? required a day to think of it; when that was up, he asked a second, and still more time ; and a reason of his dilatoriness being demanded of him, he replied, That the longer he considered of the question, the more obscure it was to him* Yet, somewhat of God, of his nature and perfections, may be known by the light of nature, Rom. i. 19, 20. and more by divine revelation. Christ declared to the woman of Samaria, what God, the object of spiritual worship, is ; saying God is a spirit ; that is, he is of a spiritual nature, John iv. 22, 24. by which we are taught, I. 1 hat God is not a body, and that we are, in our concep- tions of him, to remove every thing from him that is corporeal; for spirit, and body or flesh, are opposed to one another, Isai. xxxi. 3. and yet there have been some, both ancients and moderns, atheistically inclined, who have asserted, that mat- ter is God, and God is universal matter : and that the whole universe is God, and that extention is one of his attributes. But if God was matter, which is inert, unactive, and motion- less, he could not be the maker and mover of all things, as he is; for in him we live, and move, and have our being. Acts xvii. 28. Matter is without consciousness, it is not capable of acting ; if God was matter, he could not be the creator and governor of the world ; nor if a body, could he be omnipre- sent ; a body is not every where, cannot be in two places at the same time ; whereas God fills heaven and earth: and was he of so huge a body as to take up all space, there would be no room for other bodies, as there certainly fs ; nor would he be invisible ; a body is to be seen and felt ; but God is invisible and impalpable ; " no man has seen God at any time ;" and if a body he would not be the most perfect of beings, as he is; since angels, and the souls of men, being spirits, are more excellent than bodies. It is no objection to this that the parts of an human body are sometimes attributed to God ; since these are to be un- derstood of him not in a proper, but in an improper and figu- rative sense. His eyes signify his omniscience. His ears feis readiness to attend unto, and answer the requests of his Book I* OF THE NATURE OF GOD, 4g people. His nose and nostrils, his acceptance of the persons and sacrifices of men, Gen, viii. 21. or his disgust at them, anger with them, and non-acceptance of them, Deut. xxix. 20* His mouth is expressive of his commands, promises, threat- enings, and prophecies delivered out by him. His arms and hands signify his power, and the exertion of it, Psal. cii. 27. Nor is it any proof of corporiety in God, that a divine per- son has sometimes appeared in a human form : these were appearances of the Son of God, and were presages of his fu- ture incarnation : to prepare the minds of men for it, and the rather, since these attributions were more frequent before the coming of Christ in the flesh, and very rarely used after- wards. Nor will the formation of man in the image, and after the likeness of God, afford a sufficient argument to prove that there is something corporeal in God, seeing man has a soul or spirit, in which this image and likeness chiefly and principally lay. ii. The description of God as a Spirit, teaches us to ascribe to God all the excellencies to be found in spirits in a more em- inent manner, and to consider them as transcendent and infi- nite in him. Spirits are immaterial, have no corporal parts, as flesh., blood, and bones, Luke xxiv. 39. and though eyes, hands, &c„ are ascribed to God, yet not of flesh, Job x. 4. but such as express what is suitable to spiritual beings in the most exalted sense. Spirits are incorruptible ; for having no matter about them, they are not liable to corruption ; God is called the in- corruptible God, Rom. i. 23. Spirits are immortal % angels die not, Luke xx. 36. the souls of men cannot be killed, Matt. x. 28. It is one of the characters of God, that he only hath immortality ; and so more trancendently, and in a more emi- nent manner immortal than angels, and the souls of men ; he has it of himself, and underivatively, and is the giver of it to others. Spirits are invisible ; it is a vulgar mistake that they are to be seen; who ever saw the soul of a man? " God is invisible and dwells in light, which no man can approach wnto ; 44 OF THE NATURE OF GOD. whom no man hath ssen, nor can see," 1 Tim. i. 17. No likeness can be foimed of God : no similitude was ever seen of him, and to whom can be likened and compared ? Deut iv. 12. Aristotle argues the invisibility of God, from the invisibil- ity of the soul of man. But besides these properties, there are other still more ex- cellent in spirits, by which they approach nearer to God, and bear a greater resemblance to him ; they are lively ; angels are commonly thought to be the living creatures in Ezeki- eVs vision. God is the living God, has life in and of him- self, and gives life to all creatures that have it. Spirits are active. God is all act, actus simp/icissimus, as he is some- times stiled, the most simple act; he works and always works. Spirits, angels, and the souls of men, are intelligent beings ; the understanding of God is infinite, there is no searching of it. Spirits have the power of willing, they are voluntary agents ; and God wills whatever he does, and does whatever he wills; Spirits have the aifections of love, mercy, pity, &c. God not only loves his creatures, but " is love itself," 1 John iv. 16. in. God being a Spirit, we learn that he is a simple and uncompounded Being, and does not consist of parts, as a body does ; his spirituality involves his simplicity. If God was composed of parts he would not be eternal, and absolutely the first Being, since the composing parts, would at least co-exist with him ; and, beside, there must be a composer, who puts the parts together, and therefore must be before what is com- posed of them ; all which is inconsistent with the eternity of God : nor would he be infinite and immense ; for either these parts are finite, or infinite ; if finite they can never compose an infinite Being; and if infinite, there must be more infinites than one, which implies a contradiction : nor would he be in- dependent ; for what is composed of parts, depends upon those parts, and the union of them, by which it is preserved: nor would he be immutable, unalterable, and immortal, since what consists of parts, and depends upon the union of them, is liable to alteration, and to be resolved into those parts again, and so he dissolved and come to destruction. In short, he would Book I. OF THE IMMUTABILITY OF GOD. 45 not be the most perfect of Beings : for as the more spiritual a being is, the more perfect it is. Nor is the simplicity of God to be disproved by the Tri- nity of Persons in the Godhead ; for though there are three distinct persons, there is but one nature and essence common to them all. OF THE IMMUTABILITY OF GOD. The attributes of God are variously distinguished by di- vines; some distinguish them into negative and affirmative: the negative are such as remove from him whatever is imper- fect in creatures ; such are infinity, immutability, immorality, &c. which deny him to be finite, mutable, and mortal; and indeed, it is easier to say what God is not, than what he is: the affirmative assert some perfection in God, which is in and of himself; and which in the creatures, in any measure, is from him ; but the distinction is discarded by others ; because in all negative attributes some positive excellency is found. Some distribute them into a two-fold order, first and second : Attributes, or essential properties of the first order, declare the essence of God as in himself; and attributes of the second order, which though primarily, and in a more excellent man- ner are in God, than in creatures ; yet in an analogical sense, are in them, there being some similitude of them in them. Again, some are said to be absolute, and others relative : ab- solute ones are such as eternally agree with the essence of God, without respect to his creatures ; relative ones are such as agree with him in time, with some certain respect to his creatures : some are called proper, as those before mentioned, and others figurative, signified by the parts of the human body, and the affections of the mind, as observed in the preceding chapter: but the more commonly received distinction of the attributes of God, is into the communicable and incommunica- ble ones ; the incommunicable attributes of God, are such as 40 OF THE IMMUTABILITY OF GOD, there isno appearance or shadow of them in creatures; as in- dependence, immutability, immensity, and eternity : commu- nicable ones, are such as are common to God, with men ; or, however, of which there is some resemblance in men, as good- ness, holiness, justice, and wisdom. But as God is defined a Sp'ui' in Scripture, as has been observed, I shall endeavour to sort the perfections and attributes of God in agreement with that : and with respect to his nature, as an uncreated Spirit, may be referred, besides his spirituality and simplicity, already considered, his immutability, and infinity, which includes his immensity, or omnipresence, and eternity s and with respect to it as active, and operative, the Hfe of God, and his omnipo- tence : and with respect to the faculties, as a rational spirit, particularly the understanding, to which may belong, his om- niscience, and manifold wisdom ; and the will, under which may be considered the acts of that, and the sovereignty of it; and the affections, to which may be reduced, the love grace, mercy, hatred, anger, patience, and long-suffering of God: and lastly, under the nations of qualities and virtues, may be considered, his goodness, holiness, justice, truth, and faith- fulness ; and, as the complement of the whole, his perfection or all-sufficiency, glory, and blessedness : and in this order I shall consider them. And begin with, THE IMMUTABILITY OF GOD. Immutability is an attribute which God claims, and challen- ges as peculiar to himself; lam the Lord, I change not^ Mai. iii. 6. Mutability belongs to creatures; the visible heavens are often changing ; the face of the earth appears different at the various seasons of the year : it has undergone one great change by a flood, and will undergo another by fire. To which changeableness in them the unchangeableness of God is oppo- sed, Psal. cii. 25 — 27. The sun in the firmament has its va- rious appearances. Angels in their original nature and state, were subject to change, as the apostacy of many have shewn. Man, at his best estate, his estate of innocence, and integrity, Was altogether vanity, is now a creature subject to innumera- ble changes in life; and death at last turns him to corruption Book I. OF THE IMMUTABILITY OF GOD. 47 and dust. Good men are very mutable, both in their inward and outward estate. But God is in and of himself immutable. i. In his nature and essence, being simple, and devoid of all composition, as has been proved. Since he is eternal, there can be no change of time with him. And seeing he is infi- nite, immense, and omnipresent ; there can be no change of place. If he changes, it must be either for die better or the worse; if for the better, then he was imperfect before, and so not God : if for the worse, then he becomes imperiet and the same follows. Or if he changes from an infinitely perfect state, to another equally so, then there must be more infinites than one, which is a contradiction. Again, if any change is made in him, it must be either from somewhat within him, or from somewhat without him; if from within, there must be another and another in him ; one which changes, ana another which is changed, and so would be compound ; which is in- consistent with the simplicity of God : it from sumewhac with? out him, then there must be a superior to him, able to move and change him ; but he is the most high God ; there is none in ht-aven nor in earth above him ; he is u God over ail, bless- ed for ever." ii. God is unchangeable in his perfections or attributes ; which, though they are the same with himself, his nature and essence, as has been observed; yet, considering them separate- ly, they are helps to our better understanding of it, and serve particularly to illustrate the unchangeabkness of it. He is the same in his power as ever; his knowledge is the same ; his goodness, grace, and mercy, are immutable ; his faithful- ness he never suffers to fail. in. God is unchangeable in his purposes and decrees ; they are like the laws of the Medes and Persians, and more unal- terable than they were ; they are the mountains of brass Ze- chariah saw in a vision, from whence proceed the proviuences of God, and the executioners of thtm, Zech. vi. 1. " The counsel of the Lord stands for ever." Psal. xxxiii. 11. Nor is the immutability of the decrees of God to be dis* proved by his providences. Job was a remarkable instance 43 OF THE INFINITY OF GOD. of changes in providence, and yet he was fully persuaded of the unchangeable will of God in them, and which he strongly expresses, Job xxiii. 13, 14. iv. God is unchangeable in his love and affections to his people; "his love to them is from everlasting to everlasting," without any variation in his own heart, however different the manifestations of it may be to them. The hidings of God's face from them after conversion, prove not any change in his love to them; for he declares his loving-kindness to be more immoveable than hills and mountains, Isai. liv. 7 — 10. Afflic- tions are no evidence of a change of affections to them. God's rebukes are rebukes in love, Jer. xxxi. 18, 20. v. God is unchangeable in his covenant of grace. This was made with Christ from everlasting, and stands fast with him ; it is as immoveable as a rock, and can never be broken; such as are blessed with them are always blessed, and it is not in the power of men and devils to reverse them, Rom. xi. 29. When repentance is spoken of him, it is to be understood improperly and figuratively, after the manner of men, he do- ing like what men do, when they repent. Nor is the Immutability of God, in his promises and threat- enings, to be disproved, by observing, that the promised good, and threatened evil, are not always done. For it should be considered, that what is promised or threatened, is either ab- solute, or with a condition : now that any thing promised or threatened, absolutely, is not performed, must be denied : but if with a condition, the change will appear to be not in God, but in men, see Jer. xviii. 8 — 10. Jonah iii. 4, 10. OF THE INFINITY, OMNIPRESSENCE, AND ETERNITY OF GOD. When we say that God is infinite, the meaning is, that he is unbounded and unlimited, unmeasurable or immense, un- searchable and not to be comprehended. This attribute chiefly Book I. 0F TttE iNFINtTY 0F G0D 4q respects and includes the omnipresence and eternity of God • he is not bounded by space, and therefore is every where ; and he is not bounded by time, so he is eternal ; that he is in this sense infinite appears from his spirituality and simplicity, before established: Immutability infers both omnipresence and eternity, the' two branches of Infinity* God is infinite in all his attributes; and which are indeed himself, his nature, as has been observed, and are seprtratelv considered by us, as a relief to our mind, and helps to our better understanding it. His understanding is infinite, Psal. cxlvii. 5. The* same may be said of his knowledge and wis- dom, there is a depth, the apostle ascribes, to both ; and which is not to be sounded by mortids, Rom. xi. 33. The power of God is infinite • with him nothing is impossible ; his power has never been exerted to the uttermost ; he that has made one world, could have made millions. His goodness is infi- nite, nor can there be any addition to it ; it is infinitely per- fect, my goodness extends not to thee, Psal. xvi. 2. God is infinite in his purity, holiness, and justice ; there is none holy as he is, Job. iv. 17, 18. Isai. vi. 2, 3. in short, he is infinite- ly perfect, and infinitely blessed and happy. We rightly give him titles and epithets of immense and incomprehensible which belong to his affinity. He is immense, that is, unmea- surable. As there is a height, a depth, a length and breadth in the love of God, immeasurable, Eph. iii. 18. so there is in every attribute of God, and consequently in his nature ; his immensity is his magnitude, and of his greatness it is said, that it is unsearchable, Psal. cxlv. S. and therefore must be in- comprehensible. Sooner mav all the waters of the ocean be put into a nut shell, than that the infinite Being of God should be comprehended by angels or men. The omnipresence of God, or his ubiquity, which as it is included in his infinite, must be stronglv concluded from it; for if God is infinite, that is, unbounded with respect to space and place, then he must be every where : and this is to be proved from his power, which is every where. The omnipre* G 50 OF THE OMNIPRESENE OF GOD. senceofGod may be argued from the distributions of his goodness to all* And as he is every where by his power and providence, so he is by his knowledge ; all things are naked am: open to him, being all before him, and he present with them ; unless he was omnipresent, he could »ot be in whatso- ever place the saints are worshipping in different parts of the world ; as in Europe, so in America. The presence of God may be observed in a difft rent manner ; there is his glorious presence in heaven; there is his powerful and providential presence with all his creatures; and there is his gracious pre- sence with good men : and all suppose his omnipresence. This attribute is most clearly expressed in several passages of scripture, as particularly in Psal. exxxix. 7 — 10. See alike enumeration of places in Amos ix. 2, 3. Another passage of Scripture, proving the Omnipresence of God, is in Isai. Ixvi. 1. But no where is the Omnipresence of God more express- ly declared than in Jen xxiii. 23, 24. Nor is this disproved by oiher passages of scripture, which may seem, at first sight, to discountenance or contradict it : not such as speak of men's departing and fleeting from his presence, as Cain and Jonah are said to do, Gen. iv. 16. Jonah i. 3. for Cain only went from the place where he and the Lord had been conversing. Jonah's fL eing, was withdrawing himself from the service of God ; but he soon found his mistake, and that God was every where, and could meet with him by sea, and by land. Such that represent God as descending from heaven ; as at Babel, Sodom, and on mount Sinai ; only denotes some more than ordinary manifestations of his presence, or exertion of his power. The Eternity of God belongs to his infinity ; for as he is not bounded by space, so neither by time, and therefore eternal. He is often called the everlasting God, and the King eternal. Gen. xxi. 31. Deut. xxxiii, 27, yea, eternity itself, 1. S.tin. xv. 29. and is said to inhabit it, Isai. lvii. 15. Eternity, propcrl) so called, is 'hat which is withcu beginning and end ; time is the measure of a creature's duration; eternity only be- Book I. OF THE ETERNITY GF GOD. 51 longs to God. Psal. xc. 2. Eternity, is true of God, essen- tially considered, and in the sense explained, is to be proved ; and that he is without beginning, without end, and without succession. I That he is without beginning, or from everlasting , this is put by the way of interrogation, Hab. i. 12. and is strongly affirmed, Psal. xciii. 2. and may be proved, i. From his nature and being; the existence of God is not arbitrary, but necessary ; if arbitrary, \t must be from his own will, or from the will of another ; not from his own will, which would suppose him in being already ; and then he must be be- fore he existed, and must be, and not be, at the same instant : not from the will of another, for then that other would be both prior and superior to him, and so be God, and not he. If there was an instant in which he was not, then there was an instant in which there was no God ; and if so, there may be one again in which he may cease to be; tor that which once was not, may again not be ; and this will bring us into the depth of athe- ism. ^The eternity of God may be inferred from his immu- tability, which has been already estaolished ; those two go to- gether, and prove each other, Psal. cii. 27. Moreover, God is the most perfect Being; which he would not be, if not eter- nal ; for not to be or to have a beginning, is an imperfection ; and it is an humbling consideration to man, a creature of time, that he is but of yesterday, Job viii. 9. Add to this, that God is the first Cause of all things, and therefore must be eternal. II The Eternity of God may be proved from his attributes, several of which are said to be eternal, or from everlasting power, Rom. i. 20. knowledge, Acts, xv. 18. mercy, Psal. ciii. 17. and love, 1 John iv. 16. in. That God is Eternal maybe argued from his purposes, counsels, and decrees ; which are said to be of old, tha is, from everlasting, Isai. xxv. 1. they are expressly said to be eternal, Eph. iii. 11. and if they are eternal, then God, in whom they are, and by whom they are formed, must be e*er- »al also. Hi6 choice of men to everlasting life, is eternal, 52 ©F THE ETERNITY OF GOD. K m. ix. 41. they were chosen by him from the beginning, •£. The=>s. ii. 13. iv. The Eternity of God may be concluded from the cove- nant of grace, stiled, an everlasting covenant, 2 Sam. xxiii. 5. Now if there was a covenant made by God from everlasting, and Christ was set up b\ him so early, as the Mediator of it ; and there were blessings of grace, and promises of grace, made by him before time was, .hen he must be from everlasting. v. It may be proved from the works of God in time : all creatures are the w rks of his hand ; all things are from him, and so have a beginning ; but he from whom they are, is from none, has no cause of his being, and therefore must be eternal. So creation is made a proof of his eternal power and Godhead, Rom. i. 20. creation proves his eternity, and eternity proves his deity. Hence Thales said, " The most ancient of Beings is God.?? II. That God is to everlasting, and without end, may be proved from his spiritually and simplicity, already established. It may be argued from his independency ; from his immuta- bility, and from his dominion and government; he is, and sits King for ever; he is an everlasting King, his kingdom is an everlasting kingdom, and his dominion is from generation to generation, and will never end, Jer. x JO. Psal. x. 16. He is not only called the living God, Jer. x. 10. but is often said to live for ever and ever, Rev. iv. 9, JO. and x. 6, III. The Eternity of God, or his being from everlasting to everlasting, is without succession, or any distinctions of time succeeding one another, as moments, minutes, hours, days, months, and years; the reasons are, because he existed before such were in being ; Before the day was, lam he, Isai. xliii. 13. he is the same yesterday, to-day, and for ever ; these are all at once, and together with him ; he is he which is, and zvasy and is to come, Heb. xiii. 8. Rev. i. 4. in his nature, he co-ex- ists with all the points of time, in time ; but is unmoved and nnaffecied with any, as a rock in the rolling waves of the sca# cr a tower in a torrent of gliding water ; or as the gnomon or Book I. OF THE LIFE OF GOD. 53 stile of a gun -dial, which has all the hours of the day sur- rounding it, and the sun, by it, casts a shade upon them, points at and distinguishes them, but the stile stands firm and unmov- ed, and not effected thereby : hence it is that one day is -with, the Lord as a thousand years ; and a thousand years as one day, 2 Pet. iii. 8. In short, God is Eternity itself, and inhabits eternitv ; so he did before time, and without succession ; so he does throughout time ; and so he will to all eternity. OF THE LIFE OF GOD. In order to apprehend somewhat of the life of God, for comprehend it we cannot, it may be necessary to consider life in the creatures, what that is ; and bv rising from the lowest degree in life, to an higher, and from that to an higher still, we may form some idea of the life of God, though an inade- quate one. The sun, moon, and plane's move, yet they are Inanimate. The lowest degree of real life is in vegetables, ia herbs, plants, and trees. In animals there is an higher degree of life. There is an higher degree still, in rational creatures, angels, and the souls of men. But what comes nearest to the life of God, that we can conceive of, is that which is in rege- nerated persons, who have a principle of spiritual life, grace, and holiness, implanted in them, by the Spirit of God, This most resembles the life of God, especially, as it will be perfect and eternal in a future state, though it comes abundantly short of what is in God. I. God is life essentially, it is his nature and essence, it is in and of himself. The Father has life in himself John v. 26. and so has the son and Word of God, John i. 1, 4. and like- wise the Spirit, called, therefore, the Spirit of life, Rev. xi. 11. it is independent. God lives his own life ; he is El-Shaddai, God all sufficient, blessed, and happy in himself for evermore. The scriptures frequently speak of God as the living God, both in the Old and New Testament, Deut. v. 26. The living God is opposed to idols, lifeless and motionless, Jer. x. 10 — 16. and to heroes, kings, and emperors, deified after their 54 OF THE LIFE OF GOD. death. He asserts it of himself, which must be true, and may be depended on ; / lift up my hand, and say, I live forever , Deut. xxxii. 40. yea, it is an oath of his affirming the same, and it is tht common form of swearing with him, As I live, saith the Lord; and which is very frequently used by him, see Numb. xiv. 28. and this is no other than swearing by his life, which is himself; " for when he could swear by no greater, he swore bv himself." II. God is life eternally, without beginning, succession or end ; he is without beginning of life or end of days, and with- out any variableness ; " the same to-day, yesterday, and for- ever; he that is the true God, is also eternal life, 1 John v. 20. God is a simple and uncompounded Being, and therefore must live for ever ; he has no cause prior to him, from whom he has received his life, that can take away his life from him. There is no change, nor shadow of change, in him ; and yet, if his life was not eternal, he must be subject to the greatest of changes, death. The same arguments which prove his eter- nitv, must prove also that he lives for ever; he is the true God. the living God. and an ev-rlastng King, Jer. x. 10. Aristotle has this remarkable observation, " The energy, act, or opera- tion of God, is in) mortality, this is everlasting life ; wherefore there must needs be perpetual motion in God." Our God, the true God, is he who only haih immortality, 1 Tim. vi. 16, that is, who hath it in and of himself, and gives it to others* III. God is life efficiently, the source and spring, the author and giver of life to others ; With thee is the fountain of life, Psah xxxvi. 9. God is the author and giver of life, from the lowest to the highest degree of it. The vegetative life, that is in herbs, plants, and trees, is from him, Gen. 1. 11, 12. The life of all animals, of the fishes in the sea, the fowl of the air, and the beasts of the field; and he gives them life and breath; and when he takes it away, they die, and return to the dust, Gen. 1. 20 — 25. The rational life in angels and men, is from him. No creature can give real life ; men may paint to the lite, as we say, but they cannot give life : no man can raake a Book I. OF THE OMNIPOTENCE OF GOt). 55 living fly ; he may as soon make a world. The spiritual life that is in any of the sons of men, is from God. And eternal life, so often spoken of in scripture, as what the saints shall enjoy for evermore, is of God j it flows from his free favour and good will, through Christ, Acts xiii. 48. Tit. -i. 2. Rom, vi. 23. Now God must have life in the highest degree of it, as explained ; even essentially, originally, infinitely, and per- fectly ; or he could never give life in every sense unto his creatures ; and he must live for ever, to continue eternal life, particularly to his people, and preserve them in it. OF THE OMNIPOTENCE OF GOD. Omnipotence is essential to God, it is his nature ; a weak Deity is an absurdity to the human mind : the Very heathens suppose their gods to be omnipotent, though without reason ; but we have reason sufficient to believe that the Lord our God who is the true God, is Almighty. All spirits are powerful, our own spirits are endowed with the power and faculties of understanding, willing, reasoning, choosing, and refusing, loving and hating, &c. Angelic spirits are more powerful still, they excel in strength, and are called mighty angels, Psal. ciii. 20. One of them slew in one night one hundred and eighty-five thousand men, 2 Kings xix. 35* and what then cannot God, the uncreated and infinite Spirit, do ? This may be inferred from his infinity. God is an infinite Being, and so is every perfection of his ; his understanding is infinite, and such is his power. The omnipotence of God may be argued from his independency ; all creatures depends on him, but he depends on none. Moreover, this attribute of God mav be confirmed by his perfection ; God is a most perfect being, but that he would not be if any thing was wanting in him ; want of povv:jr in a creature is an imperfection^ but he is u able to do exceeding abundantly above all that we can ask or think,'; Eph. i. 19. and iii. 20. And this may be strengthened yet more by observing, the uselessness of many other perfections without it. What dependence can there be upon his faithful- 56 OF THE OMNIPOTENCE OF GOD. ness in his promises, if he is not able also to perform ? and of what use is his goodness, or an inclination and disposition in him to do good, if he cannot do it ? or where is his justice in rendering to every man according to his works, if he cannot execute it ? So that power belongs to God, Psal. lxii. 11. In all the doxologies or ascriptions of glory to God, by angels and men, power or might is put into them, Rev. iv. 10, 11. and v. 13. and vii. 1 i, 12. The power of God reaches to all things, and therefore is, with propriety, called Omnipotence ; all things are possible with God, and nothing impossible; Luke i. 37. Mark xiv. 36. He stopped the sun in its course, in the times of Joshua; made iron to swim by the hands of the pro- phet Elisha ; and suffered not fire to burn in the furnace of JNebuchadntzzar. 1 here are some things, indeed, which God cannot do, he cannot deny himself, 2 Tim. ii. 13. ; he cannot make another God, Deut vi. 4.; he cannot make a finite creature infinite; he cannot raise a creature to such dig- nity as to have divine perfections ascribed to it ; he cannot make contradictions true ; a thing to be, and not 10 be at the same time ; or make a thing not to have been that has been ; but then these are no prejudices to his omnipotence, nor proofs of w. afcness ; they arise only out of the abundance and fulness of his power. The power of God may be considered as absolute, and as actual or ordinate. According to ins ab- solute power, he can do all things which are not contrary to his nature and periections ; but the power of God has never been exerted to its utmost ; it is sufficient to entitle him to omnipotence, that he has done, and does, whatsoever he pleases, and that whatsoever is made, is made, is made by him, and nothing without him ; which is what may be called, his ordinate and actual power. I. These visible works of creation, are proofs of the invisi- ble attributes of God, and particularly of his eternal power , Acts iv. 24. Rom. i. 20. Creation is making something out of nothing ; which none hut omnipotence can effect; see ileb. xi. 3. no artificer, though ever so expert, can work without ma- Book I. OF THE OMNIPOTENCE OF GOD. 5? terials; but God created the fiist matter out of which all things are made. God can work without instruments, as he did in creation ; it was only by his all-commanding word that every thing sprung into being, Gen. i. '. he. Psal. xxxvi. 9. and every thing created was done at once. The works of creation were done without weariness : no labour of men is free from it: if it be the work of the brain, the fruit of close reasoning, reading, meditation, and study ; much study, the wise man savs, is a weariness of the jlesh, Eccles, xii. 12. or if it be manual operation, it is labour and fatigue ; but the everlasting God fainteth net, neither is -weary, Isai. xl. 28. he is saia to ivst on the seventh day, not on account ot fatigue but to denote he had finished his work. ii. Omnipotence appears in the sustentation and support of all his creatures; " he upholds all things by the word of his pow- •r ;" the heavens, the earth, and the pillars thereof, Acts xvii. 28. see Jobxxvi. 7,8. & xxxviii. 10 — 26. Actsxiv. 17. But what hand can do all these but an almighty one l Wonderful events in r rovidence can only be accounted for by recurring to omi i. potence, and to supernatural power and aid ; as the drowning of the whole world ; the burning of Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities of the plain ; the removing of mountains, shaking the earth, and the pillars of it, commanding the sun not to rise, and sealing up the stars, Job ix. 5, &c. in. The omnipotence of God may be seen in the redemp- tion of men by Christ, in things leading to ir, and in the com- pletion of it. Christ was declaied to be the Son of God with power, Eph. i. 19. Rom. ix. 4. iv. Almighty power ma> be discerned in the conversion of sinners; that is a creation, which is an act of omnipotence, as has been proved. Men, in conversion, are " created in Christ and after the image of God ;" conversion is a resurrection, and that requires almighty power. And if we consider the means of it, generally speaking, " the foolishness of preaching." And also the great opposition made to this work, through tht en- mity and lusts of men's hearts, the malice of Satan, willing to H 58 OF THE OMNISCIENCE OF GOD.. keep possession ; the snares of the world, and the influence of wicked companions ; it cannot be thought that the rise, pro- gress, and finishing of it, are not by might and power of men, but by the mighty, efficacious, and all-powerful grace of God, 2 Thts^. i. 11. Zech. iv. 6. v. That the Lord God is omnipotent, may be evinced from the rise and progress of Christianity, the success of the gospel, in the first times of it, and the continuance of it notwithstand- ing the opposition of men and devils. The interest of Christ in the world rose from small beginnings, by means of the preaching of the gospel ; and that by men illiterate, mean, and contemptible, who were opposed by Jewish Rabbins, and hea- then philosophers, by monarchs, kings, and emperors, and by the whole world j yet these were made to triumph every where, in a short time the universal monarchy of the earth became nominally christian. vi. The final perseverance of every particular believer in. grace and holiness, is a proof of the divine omnipotence; he is kept by the power of God, the mighty power of God, as in a garrison, through faith unto salvation, 1 Pet. i. 5. vii. The almighty power of God will be displayed in the resurrection of the dead. What else but his almighty power can gather all nations before him ? And what but his vengeful arm of omnipotence, can execute the sentence on millions and millions of devils and wicked men, in all the height of wrath, rage, fury, and rebellion ? see Phil. iii. 21. John v. 28, 29. Matt. xxv. 32—46. Rev. xx— 8— 10. OF THE OMNISCIENCE OF GOD. God is said to have a mind and understanding, Rom. xi. 34. Isat. xi. 28. to which may be referred, the attributes of knowledge and wisdom, which go together, Rom. xi. 33. I shall begin with the first of these. And prove, I: 1 hat knowledge belongs to God. In all rational crea- tures there is knowledge J mere is much in angels, and in man. Now, if there is knowledge in any of the creatures of God, then much more in God himself, iksides, all tnat knowledge Book I. OP THE OMNISCIENCE OF GOD. 5$ that is in angels or men, comes from God, He that teaches man knowledge, shall he not know? Psal. xciv. 10., He has a will which cannot be resisted, Eph. i. 11. Rom. ix. 19. and this can never be supposed to be without knowledge. In short, with- out knowledge, God would be no other than the idols of the Gentiles, who have eyes, but see not; are the work of errors, and are falshood and vanity ; but the portion of Jacob is not like them, Jer. x. 14 — 16. I go on, II. To shew the extent of the knowledge of God: it reach- es to all things, John xxi. 17. and is therefore with great pro- priety called omniscience, and which the very heathens ascribe to God. Thales being asked, Whether a man doing ill, could lie hid to, or be concealed from God ? answered, No, nor thinking neither. And Pindar says, If any man hopes that any thing will be concealed from God, he is deceived, i. God knows himself, his nature and perfections ; and each person fully knows one another ; the Father knows the Son, begotten by him, and brought up with him ; the Son knows the Father, in whose bosom he lay ; and the Spirit knows the Father and Son, whose Spirit he is, and from whom he pro- ceeds ; and the Father and Son know the Spirit, who is sent by them as the Comforter ; see Matt. xi. 27. 1 Cor. ii. 10, 11. God knows the mode of each person's subsistence in the Deity, the paternity of the Father, the generation of the Son, and the spiration of the Holy Ghost ; he knows the things he has pur- posed, and the exact time of the accomplishment of them, which he has reserved in his own power, Eph. i. 11. Eccles. iii. 1. Acts. i. 6. ii» God knows all his creatures, there is not any creature, not one excepted, that is not manifest in his sight, Heb. iv. 13. He knows all tilings inanimate, ail that is upon the earth, and all that are in the heavens ; he knows all the irrational crea- tures, the beasts of the field, K the cattle on a thousand hills; " he knows all the fishes of the sea, and provided one to swal- low Jonah, when thrown into it ; he knows all rational beings, the elect angels, whom he must know, since he has chosen them and put them under Christ, the head of all principality 60 OF THE OMNISCIENCE OF GOD. aid power. Yea the apostate angels, devils, are known by him, and are under the continual eye of God, and the re- straints of his providence. God knows all men, good and bad : the evil thoughts of men, which are many and vain, Psal. xciv. 21 and the good thoughts of men, as he must, since they are of him, and not of themselves, 2 Cor. iii. 5. he knows all the woi ds of men, there is not one upon their tongues, or uttered by hem, but he knows it altogether, Psal. exxxix. 4. every idle word must be accounted for in the day of judgment; and much more blasphemies, oaths, and curses. He is familiar with the words of good men, expressed in prayer and thanks- giving, and spiritual conversation with one another, Mai. iii. 16. And all the works and ways of men, Job xxxiv. 21. from what principles they spring, in what manner they are done, and with what views, and for what ends, Rev. ii. 2, 19. in God knows all things whatever, as well as himself and the creatures: he knows all things possible to be done, though they are not, nor never will be done ; this knowledge is what is called by the schoolmen, u Knowledge of simple intelli. genre." God knows the wickedness of some men's hearts that thej would be gu lty of the most shocking crimes, if suf- fered to live, and therefore he takes them away by death ; and that some, if they had a large share of riches, would be haugh- tv and overbearing, and that some good men, if they had them, would abuse them, to their own hurt, and therefore he gives thempoverts. Moreover, God knows all things that have been, are, or shall be ; and which the schools call, " know- ledge of vision." He knows all former things, from the be- ginning of the world; and which is a proof of Deity, and such a proof that the idols of the Gentiles cannot give, nor any for them, Isai. xli. 22. and xliii. 9» God sees and knows all things present ; all are naked and open to him, he sees all in one view ; and all things future, all that will be, because he has determined they shall be. This is what is called Prescience or Fore-knowledge ; and of which Tertullian, many hundred years ago, observed, that there were as many witnesses of it, Book I. OF THE OMNISCIENCE OF GOD,. 6 1 as there are prophets ; and I may add, as there are prophecies. What more contingent than the imaginations, thoughts, and designs of men, what they will be ? and yet these are fore- known before conceived in the mind, Deut. xxxi. 21. Pcal. cxxxix. 2. or than the voluntary actions of men ? yet these are foreknown and foretold by the Lord, long before they are done; as the names of persons given them, and what should be done by them ; as of Josiah, that he should offer the priesjs, and burn the bones of men on the altar of Bethel, see 1 Kings xiii. 2. and 2 Kings xxiii. 15, 16. and of Cyrus, that he should give orders for the building of the temple, and city of Jerusa- lem; and let the captive Jews go free without price, Isai. xliv. 28. and xlv. 13. Ezra i. 1—3. There is another sort of prescience, or fore knowledge, the scriptures speak of; on which the election of persons to eter- nal life is founded, and according to which it is, Rom. viii. 30. The Lord knows them that are his, 2 Tim. ii. 19. whilst of others he says, I know you not, Matt. vii. 23. that is, as his be- loved and chosen ones. 1 1 [. Though enough has been said to prove the omniscience of God by the enumeration of the above things ; yet this may receive further proofs from the several attributes of God ; he he is unbounded as to knowledge, and so omniscient. He is from everlasting to everlasting, and therefore must know every thing that has been, is, or shall be. He is every where, and therefore must know every creature. The heathens repre- sent the sun as seeing all things ; then much more may it be said of God, who is a sun, that he looketh to the ends of the earthy and seeth under the whole heaven ; see Psal. xix. 6. Job xxviii. 24. IV. The manner in which God knows all things is incom- prehensible by us; we can say but little of it, " such know- ledge is too wonderful for us," Psal. cxxxix. 6. we can better say in what manner he does not know, than in what he does : he does not know things by revelation, by instruction, and com- munication from another. Nor is his knowledge attained by reasoning, discoursing and inferring one thing from another, &2 OF THE WISDOM OF GOI>. as man's is ; nor does he know things by succession, one after another; for then it could not be said, that. all things are na- ked and open to him. In a word, he knows all thing* in himself, in his own essence and nature. OF THE WISDOM OF GOD. I shall prove, I. That wisdom is a perfection in God, and is in him in its utmost perfection. An unwise Being cannot be God. No man is wise, says Pythagoras, but God only. He is no less than three times said to be the only wise God> Rom. xvi 27. 1 Tim. i. 17. Jude 25. Men may be wise in some things, and not in others; but he is wise in every thing; he is essentially wise ; there is the personal wisdom of God, which is Christ; who is often spoken of as wisdom, and as the wisdom of God; see Prov. viii. 12 — 31. 1 Cor. i. 24. and .here is his essential wisdom, the attribute now under consideration ; which is no other than the nature and essence of God. God is wisdom efficiently; he is the source and fountain of it, the God and giver of it; all th it is in the angels of heaven comes from him ; all that Adam had, or any of his sons ; or was in Solomon, the wisest of men ; or is in the politicians and philosophers of every age; and particularly, the highest and best of wisdom, the fear of God in the soul of man, there are some shining ap- pearances and striking instances of it. And which, II. Will be next observed. I. The wisdom of God appears in his purposes and decrees, Isai. xxv. 1. The end for which God has appointed all that has been, or shall be, is himself, his own glory, the best end {hat can be proposed ; Rom. xi. 36. The means he fixes on to bring it about, are either extraordinary or ordinary ; which latter are second causes depending upon him, the first Cause, and which are linked together, and under his direction and influence most certainly attain the end ; see Hos. ii. 21, 22. In the persons he has chosen : his end is the praise of his own grace, Eph, i. 5, 6. to shew the sovereignty of it, he passed Book I. OF THE WISDOM OP GOD. 6£ this decree without any respect to the works of men, and to shew that he is no respecter of persons, he chose some out of every na\ion, Jews and Gentiles; and to shew the freeness of his grace, he chose the foolish and weak things of this world, and things that are not ; he has pitched upon means the wisest that could be devised, even " sanctification of the Spirit, and belief of the truth ; the obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus,'' the righteousness and death of Christ, 2 Thess. ii. 13. 1 Pet. i. 2. So that this decree stands firm and stable. The subordinate end of election, is the salvation of the elect. The scheme and plan of which salvation is so wisely formed, that it is called the manifold wisdom of God, Eph. iii. 10. ii. The wisdom of God is more clearly manifested in his visible works in time : 0 Lord, how manifold are thy Ivor k*, in wisdom hast thou made them all I Psal. civ. 24. And, 1. It appears in the works of creation: Psal. exxxvi. 5. Whole volumes have been written on this subject, the wisdom of God in creation ; and more might ; the subject is not exhausted. If we look up to the starry heavens ; if we descend inio the airy region ; if we come down to the earth We may behold, all admirably fitted for an habitation for man, and for the glory of God, Rev. iv. 11. 2. The wisdom of God appears in the works of providence* It may be observed in the various returning seasons; in his opening his hand of providence and satisfying the desires of all living ; particularly, he maketh all things work together for the good of his people ; for the trial of their grace, and to make them meet for glory; nor is there any one trial or ex- ercise they meet with, but what there is a necessity of it, and is for the best; when the mystery of providence is finished, the wisdom of God, in every part, will appear striking and amazing ; as when a man looks on the wrong side of a piece of tapestry, or only views it in detached pieces, he is scarcely able to make any thing of it ; nor can he discern art and beauty in it: but when it is all put together, and viewed ou its right side, the wisdom, the contrivance, and art of the maker are observed with admiration. 64 OP THE WISDOM OF GOD. 3. The wisdom of God is to be seen in the great work of redemption and salvation by Christ ; herein he hath abounded towards us, in all wisdom and prudence, Eph. i. 7. 8. In the per- son fixed upon to be the Redeemer. The Son of God was the fittest person to be employed in this service; partaking of both natures, he was the only proper person to be the Mediator be- tween God and man, to be the day's-man, and lay his hand on both, and reconcile those two parties at variance, and to do what respected both, even " things partaining to God, and to make reconciliation for the sins of the people." Through Christ's being man, he became our near kinsman, flesh of our flesh, and bone of our bone; and so the right of redemption belonged to him ; hence the same word Go I, in the Hebrew language, signifies both a redeemer and a near kinsman. — But then the person pitched upon to be the Redeemer, is God as well as man ; and so as he had pity for men as man, he had a zeal for God and his glory, as a divine person ; and would be, as he was, concerned lor the glorifying all his divine per- fections, one as well as another* Who could *have thought of the Son of God, and proposed his becoming man, and suffer- ing, and dving in the stead of men, to redeem ttitm? this is nodus deo vindice dignus ; what God only could have found out; and he claims it to himself; /, he only wise God, have found a ransom, Job xxxiii. 24. The wisdom of God may be observed in the way and manner in which redemption is ob- tained : which being by the price of the blood of Christ, and in a way of full satisfaction to law and justice ; the different claims of mercy and justice, which seemed to clash with one another, are reconciled ; by this happy method wisdom has pitched upon, they both agree ; " mercy and truth meet to- gether, righteousness and peace kiss each other." The wis- dom of God is to be discerned in the time of man's redemp- tion; which was the most opportune and seasonable; it was after the faiih and patience of God's people had been suffici- ently tried, even for the space of four thousand years from the first hint of a Redeemer; and when the gentile world was Book I. OF THE WILL OF GOD. 65 covered with darkness, blindness* and ignorance, and abound- ed with all kind of wickedness. 4. The wisdom of God shmes in the go-pel, the good n