PRINCETON, N. J '"'^"■'K Shelf. 'tf. Division '^^\^\S Section ^y~^£L^JJ> . Number COPV 2- >PY i 'S'-i >iM.' ^>N ??f^'J ■>■.■•-. KfTi ult- >- t**/ THE SEEVANT OF THE LORD THE SERVANT OF THE LORD IN ISAIAH XL-LXVI, BECLAIMED TO ISAIAH AS THE AUTHOR ^rgumenf^ ^ftucture+ an^ ©afe BY JOHN FORBES, D.D., LL.D. EMERITUS PROFESSOR OF ORIENTAL LANGUAGES, ABERDEEN EDINBUEGH T. & T. CLAEK, 38 George Street 1890 PREFACE. It is with feelings of the deepest and most sincere gratitude I give thanks to Ahiiighty God, that health and strength have been granted me, at the advanced age of eighty-seven, to complete at length my Com- mentary on Isaiah's Last Prophecy of the " Servant of the Lord " in chaps, xl.-lxvi., and to reclaim for Isaiah its authorship, now denied by almost every bibhcal scholar on this side of the Atlantic, Dr. Delitzsch no longer forming an exception. Knowing from my own experience how difficult it is to overcome long-cherished opinions, I cannot expect those who have arrived at an opposite conclusion after careful examination to assent to my views ; but I do cherish the hope that the arguments adduced for the genuineness and authenticity of the Prophecy as a writing of the time of Isaiah will be found sufficient to convince younger scholars, who approach the question without prepossession, of the utter untenableness of the prevalent opinion that the Prophecy is the work of an author who wrote at the time of Cyrus ; and to prove that, so far from being a "desultory composition, often interrupted and obscured by retrocessions and resumptions," as even Dr. Joseph Addison Alexander affirms, the Prophecy forms a continuous and most symmetrically arranged whole, in every respect worthy VI PREFACE. of the great and most highly gifted writer to whom from the earHest times it has been ascribed. One of the fairest and most successful attempts I have seen to trace the line of argmnent in what, for shortness' sake, has been designated II. Isaiah, or Deutero-Isaiah, is that of Kev. Canon S. E. Driver, in his Isaiah : his Life and Times. I am happy to find substantial agreement between his analysis of the argument and that given in. the following pages. He has avoided the fatal error of explaining away whatever seems at first sight contrary to his views, as interpola- tions {e.g., chaps. Ivi. -Iviii. ; see Ewald and Prof Cheyne, pages 21, 22) or as omissions (see Prof Cheyne, page 23). We must accept and account for all the elements of the problem laid before us. Let us, then, strive to realize to ourselves as clearly and vividly as possible the point on which, in the first great division or book of the Prophecy (chaps, xl.-xlviii.), the decision is rested as to Who has a right to the title of Godhead — Jehovah, or the gods of the idolators ? This is distinctly stated by Canon Driver : " Here the prophet imagines a judgment scene. The nations are invited to come forward and plead their case with Jehovah. The question is. Who has stirred up the great conqueror Cyrus ? Who has led him on his career of victory .? " ^ As the attainment of the truth on the important question now before us — of the authorship of II. Isaiah — must be the desire of every sincere and impartial inquirer, I have now to confess, when too late to make any alteration (as the greater part of my volume is already in the hands of the printer), that I see I have ^ Isaiah, his Life and Times, by Rev. Canon S. R. Driver, page 139. PEEFACE. Vll fallen into a similar mistake to that of our modern critics, in not fully recognizing the force of the argu- ments for the opposite opinion. I have attributed too exclusively to Isaiah the credit of supporting the faith and hopes of Israel under the severe trial to which they must have been put by their sojourn and oppression in Babylonia, without adverting to the rejoinder the modern critics might make, that Jeremiah's prophecies, limiting the duration of their exile to seventy years, were those that sustained their faith. This now ex- plains to me what before had puzzled me to understand, how intelligent men could regard as a prediction of a future event the utterances (Isaiah xli. 2-4 and 25) of an author whom they considered to be writing at the time the event was taking place. But, as predicted by Jeremiah, the assurance that Israel's exile would ter- minate at the end of seventy years would undoubtedly tend in part to " comfort " them under their afflictions. Yet we must guard against resting satisfied with this as a sufficient explanation of the difficulties of the problem before us. For to what, at best, do the revela- tions made by Jeremiah amount but to the assurance, " Though I make a full end of all the nations whither I have scattered thee, I will not make a full end of thee" (Jer. xxx. 11)? There was nothing new in Jeremiah's predictions (except what related to the dura- tion of the time) that had not been foretold by Moses more than a thousand years before in the Song which he left as his dying legacy to his people, warning them that after his " death they would utterly corrupt them- selves . . . and evil will befall you in the latter days ; because ye will do evil in the sight of the Loed to pro- voke Him to anger " (Deut. xxxi. 29). This Song he enjoined them, in the name of the Loed, to ''command VIU PEEPACE. your children to observe to do all the words of this law" (= instriLction, doctrine, Gesenius' Lexicon) — ending, however, with the comforting assurance, " The Loed shall judge His people, and then repent Himself for His servants, when He seeth that their power is gone . . . and He shall say, Where are their gods, the rock in which they trusted ? . . . Let them rise up and help you. See now that I, even I, am He, and there is no god with Me. I kill, and I make alive : I have wounded, and I heal " (verses 86-39) : the whole con- cluding with a call on all the Gentiles to come and partake in the blessings which He has destined for them through the instrumentality of His elect people Israel, " Rejoice, O ye nations, with His people " (verse 43). Is this theory, which everyone could gather for him- self from Moses' words, and which amounts to little more than this : Ye have been sent to Babylon and shall be brought bach again, the substantial amount of the Poem (prophecy in no proper sense of the word can it be called) which a writer of consummate ability and intelligence (as everyone must acknowledge the author of the so-called Deutero-Isaiah to be) set himself dowm deliberately to compose at the close of the Babylonish captivity, when any lessons which God designed to teach Israel by its disciplinary training must already have been learned ? — consequently, as it would seem, without any conceivable aim or purpose ! If such be the theory we are called upon to accept, is the judg- ment which we have felt constrained to pass upon it too severe, that it represents the writer to have been either a fool, or a forger who wished to pass off his own lucubrations as an ancient and genuine document '? A highly important object must have been in view PEEFACE. IX that led an author to sit down and indite the longest and most remarkable prophecy on one continuous sub- ject contained in Scripture. Nor have we far to seek to discover what that object must have been. The most momentous change in the belief and practice of Israel was effected as the result of their exile in Babylon, in the utter renunciation, from that time forth, of idolatry, to which they had all along been so addicted from the time of Moses, that all God's severe disciplinary judgments had hitherto been powerless to cure, and to lead to the acknowledgment of the sole Godhead of Jehovah. This great change was evidently brought about by the fulfilment of their predicted de- liverance and restoration to their own land. Now where do we find these predictions ? In this Prophecy of Isaiah alone. There are five different points which would contribute to this change, if re- garded as previous predictions, long fondly cherished by the exiles who brought with them copies from Jeru- salem, and studied ever more carefully for the con- firmation of their faith and hopes, as the time drew near for their fulfilment. These, however, could have no influence to this effect, if they were but the un- authorized utterances of a nameless author, now for the first time propounded. Briefly stated, these five points (which will be found fully stated in the following pages) are : 1. The wording of Cyrus' decree in Ezra i. 1, 2, in which he acknowledges the supremacy of Jehovah as having " given me all the kingdoms of the earth, and charged me to build the house of Jehovah, the God of Israel (He is God) which is in Jerusalem ". The words are copied from Isaiah, chaps, xliv. 27, 28, and xlv. 1-3. Now, can it be believed that unless the most convincing X PREFACE. evidences of the genuineness and antiquity of Isaiah's prophecies had been furnished by the Israehtes, so shrewd a man of the world as Cyrus would ever have issued such a decree "throughout all his kingdom"? Of the reality of this decree, as will be shown, we have the strongest evidence, since it was afterwards ques- tioned by the adversaries of the Jews in the reign of Darius, who caused investigation to be made, and the decree was found at Achmetha (Ecbatana) ; and may we not hope, amidst the many interesting memorials lately discovered, that a copy of the original decree may yet be brought to light ? 2. The importance and emphasis laid on the specifi- cation of the name of the predicted Deliverer of Israel, "I am the Lord which call thee by tliy name" — "I have called thee by thy name : I have su7'named thee, though thou hast not known Me " (Isaiah xlv. 3, 4), could only have proceeded from an author who lived ages before the birth of Cyrus. Such specification would be utterly ludicrous if made by one who wrote at the close of the Babylonish captivity. 3. The writer of II. Isaiah has indelibly identified his age with that of Hezekiah (c/. xli. 5-13 ; see pp. 89-92) and his queen, Hephzibah (c/. Ixii. 4, 5 ; see page 92). Further, the fondness of the writer, here shown, for Paronomasia, or allasion to the symbolical import of Proper names, speaks strongly for his identification with the Proto-Isaiah who arranged his first great prophecy so as to bring out successively the import of the names of his sons and himself, "Immanuel, Maher- shalal-hash-baz, Shear-jashub, Isaiah ". A later writer, had such been the author of II. Isaiah, would most carefully have avoided such an apparent identification of himself with his predecessor. PREFACE. XI 4. The Prophecy, xl.-lxvi., as it now stands, forms but a part of the whole prophecies of Isaiah. Thus only can we explain the transposition of the four prose chapters, xxx\d. to xxxix. The first two, xxxvi., xxxvii., which chronologically should succeed xxxviii., xxxix., are so placed as most appropriately closing the Assyrian period, and proving the truth of Isaiah's earlier pro- phecies against them. The Assyrian king, unconscious that he was but " the rod in Jehovah's hand" (chap. x. 5) for the chastisement of His people, had by the mouth of his captain, Rabshakeh, magnified himself against Jehovah, saying, " Who are they among all the gods of the lands that have delivered their country out of my hand, that Jehovah should deliver Jerusalem out of my hand?" (xxxvi. 20). In reply to his proud boastings the LoED sent forth His angel, and " smote in the camp of the Assyrian a hundred and fourscore and five thou- sand " (verse 36). On the other hand, the last two chapters, xxxviii., xxxix., which narrate Hezekiah's sickness and recovery, and the Loed's message to him on his ostentatious display of all his treasures to the ambassadors of Merodach-Baladan, king of Babylon — All these shall be carried to Babylon, and " thy sons shall be eunuchs in the king's palace " — prepare the reader for the Baby- lonian period and its very diversified results. The prophecies of Isaiah are thus closely welded to- gether, the prose chapters forming the connecting link between the Earlier and the Later Prophecies — con- stituting, if the Earlier and Later Prophecies be counted each as but a single member, a perfect Three, or Triad, with the prose portion ; or again, if the Earlier Pro- phecies, consisting, as Dr. Delitzsch has shown, of 3 Syzigies or Pairs, be counted as 3, and so correspond Xll PREFACE. to the 3 Books of the Later Prophecies — constituting a perfect Seven, or Heptad. 5. There Hes a fundamental objection on its very face to the hypothesis that Isaiah xl. to Ixvi. is the produc- tion of an independent writer, and not of Isaiah. Whatever opinion of the nature and origin of prophecy may find favour with modern critics, one indispensable condition to its acceptance by Israel as a prophecy was that it must begin and be prefaced by the distinct claim, as its authorization, that "The word of Jehovah came to" the prophet. To this rule there is no exception in all the prophets. " Comfort ye, comfort ye," &c. (xl. i.), therefore, cannot be the beginning of a new prophecy. For its authorization we must look back to the preceding chapter, xxxix. 5, " Hear the word of the Lord of Hosts ". There is here a slight difference from the form of expression in every other prophet, but merely verbal, yet deserving observation, as it occurs in both the Earlier and Later Prophecies ; thereby identifying the author of I. Isaiah with the author of 11. Isaiah, while it differentiates him from all the other prophets. The absence of the usual form of authorization in Isaiah is, however, amply compensated for by equivalent forms. Thus in the Earher Prophecies the introductory form is, " The vision of Isaiah the son of Amoz which he saw concerning Judah," &c., and "Hear the word of Jehovah'' (verse 10); but above all, by the special honour conferred on Isaiah by his call at a very youthful period to the prophetic office, in the vision vouchsafed to him in chap, vi., when, in response to his profound sense and confession of his unworthiness, a seraph is sent to touch his lips with a live coal from off the altar and to " purge his sin," and the commission is given PREFACE. Xlll him by the Lord of Hosts, "Go and tell this people, Hear ye indeed, but understand not," &c. (vi. 9, 13). In the Later Prophecies, again, we have in the two chapters which preface them, " In those days was Hezekiah sick unto death. And Isaiah the prophet the son of Amoz came to him and said unto him. Set thine house in order ; for thou shalt die and not Hve. . . . And Hezekiah wept sore. Then came the word of the Lord unto Isaiah, saying. Go and say to Hezekiah, Thus saith the Lord," &c. (xxxviii. 1 to 5). And, again, in chap, xxxix., when Isaiah came to Hezekiah, after he had shown all his treasures to the ambassador of Merodach-Baladan, " Then said Isaiah to Hezekiah, Hear the word of the Lord of Hosts " (verse 5). On the ground of the 'five points now stated no feasible explanation, so far as we can see, can be given of the argument and contents of Isaiah xl. to Ixvi. as more fully expounded in the following commentary ; and till such is given, we venture to reclaim the authorship to Isaiah and his times. Authorship, Argument, and Date OF ISAIAH'S LAST GREAT PROPHECY THE SERVANT OE THE LOED," CHAPTEES XL.-LXVI. The greatest achievement of the so-called " Higher Criti- cism" has been the supposed discovery that the last twenty-seven chapters of Isaiah (xl.-lxvi.) are not the work of Isaiah, as believed for so many ages by the people to whom they were addressed, but were composed by some unknown prophet who wrote towards the close of the Babylonish captivity. So general is the acceptance which this new theory has obtained, that anyone who is bold enough to maintain that these chapters, as we now possess them, could have proceeded from Isaiah, is set down as far behind the age. In the words of a late writer, " Only the most uncompromising champions of what is taken for orthodoxy now venture to deny that the Book of Isaiah is the work of two persons ". Not only the great majority of German critics consider the later date of chapters xl.-lxvi. as incontrovertibly proved, but this conclusion claims the assent of many of our own scholars, such as Dr. Samuel Davidson, Dean Stanley, Mr. Matthew Arnold, Professor Driver, and 1 2 THE SERVANT OF THE LORD. one of the latest commentators on Isaiah, Professor T. K. Cheyne.^ Still I feel constrained to say that the more the theory is examined, the more unsatisfactory does it appear. It satisfies none of the requisites of a sound theory. It runs counter to the main bearing of all the evidence, external and internal. It compels the expositor to ignore, or explain away, the facts of history, and obliges him to overlook or expunge certain passages, as interpolations by later hands ; but above all, in consequence of taking up a wrong stand- point, it has introduced so great confusion into the argument as to render it impossible for either interpreter or reader to form any consistent view of the whole prophecy, or of the author's aim and arrangement of his subject. In the first place, it must be admitted, on the most cursory view of the question, that the presumption is strongly against the later date, which denies the authorship to Isaiah. For what are we called upon to believe? That a writer of transcendent genius, admitted by all competent judges to surpass even the greatest writers among the Hebrews, with the exception alone, if exception it be, of Isaiah, grew up among the exiles in Babylon and attracted to himself, as he must have done, by this remarkable prediction, the attention of all his contemporaries, and yet afterwards dropped so entirely into oblivion that his very name and memory perished, leaving not a trace behind of his separate existence ! — not a suspicion or whisper of such separate existence being ever breathed till the thirteenth century of the Christian era ! Yet this is but part of the wonder. We are called upon in addition to believe that, in the midst of a people banished from their native land, and compelled to adopt the dialectic peculiarities of the language of their foreign oppressors — which so mingled with, and finally superseded their own, that their original tongue was all but forgotten (Nehem. viii. 7, 8) — a poet was born and 1 See Encydojtcsdia Britannica, article ' ' Isaiah ". CHAPTERS XL.-LXVI. 3 "brought up, who yet attained to such purity of diction and command of the ancient Hebrew as has never been surpassed, if even equalled ! The arguments for the Babylonian origin of this prophecy must be strong, indeed, w^hich can outweigh these opposing presumptions. But the later date is equally at variance with history. "We have an historical fact of which no rational account can be rendered on the supposition that II. Isaiah (as for shortness' sake this portion of Isaiah has been styled) was not written till within a few years before the return of the Jewish captives from Babylon. In Ezra i. 1-4, we have the account of a proclamation which Cyrus the Great caused to be made "throughout all his kingdom," in which he ascribes to "Jehovah, the God of Israel," the origin of all his powder, and makes the public acknowledgment, that, in deference to His command, he issues the decree for the rebuilding of the temple of Jehovah in Jerusalem. The words of the proclamation are: "Thus saith Cyrus, king ■of Persia, Jehovah, the God of heaven, hath given me all tlie kingdoms of the earth; and He hath charged me to build Him an house at Jerusalem w^iich is in Judah". The ■expressions are evidently borrowed from Isaiah xlv. 1 : "Thus saith Jehovah to His anointed, to Cyrus, whose right hand I have holden, to subdue nations before him ; and I will loose the loins of kings to open before him the two- leaved gates," &c, ; and (versed) " For Jacob My servant's sake, and Israel Mine elect, I have even called thee by thy name ". And the charge to which the decree refers is found in xliv. 28 : " That saith of Cyrus, He is My shepherd, and shall perform all My pleasure ; and to the temple, Thy foundation shall be laid". Now the question which is thus raised is, what could have induced a Gentile monarch, the greatest conqueror of his age, to make such a public acknowledgment before all the peoples of his empire, of the greatness and supremacy of Jehovah, the God of a small captive people ? We have 4 THE SERVANT OF THE LORD. a sufficient explanation of this proceeding of Cyrus, but nob otherwise, if full and unmistakable proofs, satisfactory to so shrewd a judge of human nature as Cyrus, were offered to him of the antiquity and genuineness of the prophecy of Isaiah, as having been writtezi a century and a half before his capture of Babylon, foretelling his conquests, specifying his very name, and enjoining him to rebuild Jehovah's temple at Jerusalem ; and, consequently, demonstrative of a truly miraculous and divine foreknowledge of the future, such as no heathen oracle or god could show. This, accordingly, is the account of the special favour shown by Cyrus to the Jews, assigned by their historian Josephus, who says, " This was known to Cyrus by his reading the book which Isaiah left behind him of his prophecies. Accordingly, when Cyrus read this (the charge given to him by Jehovah), an earnest desire and ambition seized upon him to fulfil what was so written " (Ant., bk. xi., cap. i., § 2). The decree of Cyrus and the pre-exilic date of II. Isaiah's prophecy must stand or fall together ; and unless it be maintained that the account as given in Ezra is a forgery, and that no such decree could have been issued by a heathen sovereign, we are shut up to the early date of the prophecy. Of the existence of the decree, however, we have strong confirmation, since we find that its execution soon came to be resisted by the adversaries of the Jews, who succeeded in arresting the rebuilding of the temple till the time of Darius, king of Persia, when, at his command, search was made for the decree of Cyrus. It was found at Achmetha (Ecbatana), in consequence of which Darius renewed the order for the work to be carried on, and all necessary expenses to be defrayed from the royal revenues. Nor does such an acknowledgment of the supremacy of Jehovah (in consequence of miraculous evidence afforded of His Divine prescience and power) stand alone as publicly made by a heathen monarch, and who yet adhered to the worship of his own gods. We find parallel instances in the similar CHAPTEES XL.-LXVI. 5 addresses "made unto all peoples, nations, and languages," issued by heathen monarchs, e.g., by Nebuchadnezzar {Dan. iv.), and by Darius (Dan. vi. 25-27). But further, we have another historical fact, the force of which has been strangely overlooked, and which compels us to ascribe the authorship of this prophecy to Isaiah and to none other, unless we would cast the greatest dishonour on his memory, as a prophet unfaithful to his calling. Israel's corruption and departure from God had become so invete- rate as to be incurable by any but the most severe judgments (Isa. i.). To testify this was the occasion of Isaiah's calling from the first (chap. vi. 8-13) ; and now in the chapter immediately preceding this prophecy, Isaiah is commissioned, on occasion of Hezekiah's showing all his treasures to the ambassadors of Merodach-Baladan, king of Babylon, to announce to him and Israel that " all should be carried to Babylon" (xxxix. 6). With such a denuncia- tion of judgment, is it likely that any true prophet could stop short, unless he would belie the special function of the prophetic office, the interpretation to Israel of the purpose of God's dealings with His people, and the upholding of their faith under the severity of predicted judgments, by the assurance that these were designed to subserve the accomplishment of the high destiny promised them as God's people? "Comfort ye, comfort ye, my people" (xl. 1), was therefore the indispensable sequel to the judgment now denounced. Nor let it be objected that more than a hundred years elapsed before the judgment came. This was wholly un- known to Isaiah, further than that a respite was granted during the fifteen years added to Hezekiah's life, on the expiration of which the probability was that no longer grace would be extended. Unless, therefore, the prophet proved untrue to his calling, or died soon after denouncing the impending judgment, he must have followed it up with the necessary consolation, and consequently be the author of 6 THE SERVANT OF THE LORD. the chapters under review. Viewing, moreover, the evil day as very close at hand, it is not to be wondered at that the prophet, in order to lead all to realize the certainty of the irrevocable sentence that had gone forth from the Loed, for the most part throws himself and his readers into the time of the captivity as if already begun. Isaiah, there- fore, is speaking to his oivn time,^ and administering the coiisolation and instruction which it seemed to demand ; and we have no need to ascribe to some "Great Un- named," who lived ages afterwards, the authorship of the chapters. Thus far the question as to the authorship and unity of the so-called Deutero-Isaiah has been argued on general grounds ; but no entirely satisfactory solution of the ques- tion can be reached until the prevailing errors regarding the argument and connection of the prophecy are removed. The error, perhaps, which above all others has tended to throw the whole qviestion into confusion, is the idea attri- buted to the prophet that with the return from Babylon God's purposes for the disciplinary training of Israel were completed, and that the accomplishment of all the Divine promises to them would immediately follow. Thus Dr. De- litzsch's representation is : "It was not, indeed, during the Babylonish captivity that the servant of Jehovah appeared in Israel with the gospel of redemption ; but, as we shall never be tired of repeating, this is the human element in these pro- phecies, that they regard the appearance of the ' Servant of Jehovah,' the Saviour of Israel and the heathen, as connected with the captivity ; the punishment of Israel terminating, according to the law of the perspective fore- shortening of prophetic vision, with the termination of the captivity ; and the final glory of Israel and the final salva- tion of all mankind beginning to dawn on the border of the ^ As is manifestly implied in the words he puts into Hezekiali's mouth, "For there shall be peace and truth in my days" (Isa. xxxix. 8). CHAPTERS XL.-LXVI. 7 captivity".^ Nay, so far does Dr. Delitzsch carry his view- that he says: "In the view of the prophet himself, the period immediately succeeding the captivity really would be the end of time ".- Not less explicit are the words of one of our most learned and accomplished exegetes,* who has given much attention to this subject. " The method of representation in this prophecy draws no distinction between the Christian and the Babylonian redemption, or between the miseries of sin and of exile. His representation is massive, solid. The evils of the captivity are the last evils of Israel for their sins : they are the evils of sin. The restoration from the captivity is the restoration from the condition of evil to the final state of glory. The servant appears in the exile, amidst Israel's last troubles : he works out, through his knowledge and sufferings, the redemption of Israel from sin, and therefore from trouble ; and the redemption is final. On the soil of Babylon, at this era, concentrate themselves all the moral forces that work upon the earth ; there and thus they come into colhsion; there ensues the defeat of evil. Out from there, through the wilderness, delivered for ever, and free, marches Israel, with Jehovah, as of old, at their head, who as He passes that most rancorous and persevering of His kingdom's foes, Edom, treads it in the winepress under His feet, sprinkling its blood upon His garments, and staining all His raiment. Jerusalem, the bringer of good tidings, at the sound of the approaching God gets her up into the high mountain, and proclaims across the valleys to the cities of Judah, ' Behold your God ! ' Thus restored, Israel is the light of the world. The Gentiles come to her light, and kings to the brightness of her rising." ^ Delitzsch's Commeiitary on Isaiah, vol. ii., p. 276. T. & T. Clark, Edinburgh. - Ibid., p. 416. '^ Rev. Professor A. B. Davidson, LL.D., " The Servant of the Lord," in 2Vie British and Foreign Evangelical Revierv for October, 1872. 8 THE SERVANT OF THE LORD. Now, it seeiiis impossible that any such representation could have proceeded from Isaiah (or from any prophet who succeeded him, unless he meant to charge his prede- cessor, the proto-Isaiah, with being a false prophet), since it would be inconsistent with what Isaiah at his calling to the prophetic office had been ordained to testify to Israel, that such and so persistent was the state of spiritual blind- ness and hardness of heart which they had reached that nothing but a succession of the most severe judgments would suffice to open their eyes and ears. For when the prophet asked, "How long?" the answer was: "Until cities be waste without inhabitant, and houses without man, and the land become utterly waste, and the Lord have removed men far away, and the forsaken places be many in the midst of the land " (Isa. vi. 10-12). And if it be urged that thus far the Babylonian captivity was sufficient to exhaust the meaning of the prophecy, we have but to look to the sequel in verse 13 : " And if there be yet a tenth in it, it shall again be eaten up ; as a terebinth and as an oak, whose stock remaineth when they are felled, so the holy seed is the stock thereof ". The only inference that can justly be drawn from these words is that but a "tenth" would return of Israel after the desolation from the cap- tivity, and that that tenth would again be decimated, till only a " stock " should remain. This, indeed, is the prophet's own inference, which in order to keep fresh in the remembrance of his countrymen he embodied in the name he gave to his first-born son. Shear- jashub = " a remnant shall return ". Further, Isaiah must have been well aware that before Zion's final establishment in glory, Israel was to be rejected from being God's people, and another people to be taken in their stead. This had been expressly foretold in Moses' Song (Deut. xxxii.), which almost all critics (even those who refer the composition of Deuteronomy as a whole to a late period) consider to be anterior to Isaiah. "They have CHAPTEKS XL.-LXVI. 9 moved me to jealousy with that which is not God ; and I will move them to jealousy with those which are not a people" (verse 21). With evident reference, too, to the prophecy, which God enjoined to be taught to the people " that this song may be a witness for Me against the Children of Israel" (Deut. xxxi. 19), Isaiah's elder contemporary, Hosea, had been commanded to call his son " Lo-ammi " [ = not My people] ; "for ye are not My people, and I will not be your God " (Hosea i. 9) : a sentence affecting Judah as well as Israel, and to be reversed only in the latter days, when " it shall come to pass that, in the place where it was said unto them, ye are not My people, it shall be said unto them, Ye are the sons of the living God. x\nd the Children of Judah, and the Children of Israel shall be gathered together, and they shall appoint themselves one head, and shall go up from the land " [of their captivity] (i. 10-11). To this Hosea adds, in iii. 4, 5, the remarkable description of the anomalous state of Israel in the intermediate period, which, when the Jewish Eabbi Kimchi wrote, he recognises as so strikingly applicable to the present condition of his people : " These are the days of the captivity in which we now are at this day ; we have no king nor prince out of Israel, for we are in the power of the nations and of their kings and princes ; and have no sacrifice for God, nor image for idols ; no epliocl for God that declares future things by Urim and Thummim, and no teraphim for idols, which show things to come, according to the mind of those that believe in them ". With these distinct predictions before him, Isaiah could never have meant to represent " the evils of the captivity" as being "the last evils of Israel for their sins," nor "the final glory of Israel, and the final salvation of all mankind, as beginning to dawn on the borders of the captivity". Such a view leads to entire misapprehension of the con- nection of Book I. with the two succeeding books, the subjects of which, according to the mind of the prophet. 10 THE SERVANT OF THE LORD. are separated by a wide interval of time from the Baby- lonian captivity — all reference to which ceases with Book I. ; as the warning notice to Israel in the last w^ords of chapter xlviii. clearly show : " Go ye forth of Babylon, flee ye from the Chaldeans ". It is now more than fifty years since Eiickert made the remarkable discovery that these twenty-seven chapters had been most systematical!}^ divided into three great portions, or sections, of nine chapters each, marked off and separated from one another by a refrain occurring at the end of each : " There is no peace, saith the Lord, to the wicked," closing chapter xlviii. ; which is again repeated in similar terms at the close of chapter Ivii., while the same idea amplified terminates the whole in chapter Ixvi. Yet, strange to say, this striking arrangement has never hitherto been sufficiently utilized for the main purpose designed by its author, to aid the reader in tracing the successive steps in the argument and in following out the train of thought. The prevalent idea is that there is no regular progress in the argument, nor distinct succession of thought — that the prophecy is a "desultory composition " : that although there may be " a sensible progression in the whole from the beginning to the end, still it is often inter- rupted and obscured by retrocessions and resumptions "} But how, then, it may be asked, account for the adoption of the opinion now so generally entertained ? The explana- tion is not far to seek. The wave of scepticism which passed over from England to Germany last century led to the denial of the possibility of miracle or prophecy in the true sense of the terms ; and it became necessary to elimi- nate these entirely from the Old and New Testaments, and to explain away whatever opposed this assumed funda- mental principle. Chapters xl.-lxvi. of Isaiah, if admitted to be the composition of Isaiah, formed a standing protest against this assumption, since it was impossible to deny ^ Dr. Joseph A. Alexander: Preface to Later Prophecies of Isaiah. CHAPTERS XL.-LXVI. 11 that anything less than divine foreknowledge could have predicted, a century and a half beforehand, the victories of Cyrus the Great, and his granting permission to the captive Israelites to return to Jerusalem and to rebuild their city and temple — specifying even the very name of the conqueror. It was necessary at all hazards to deny the authorship of Isaiah and the early date of the prophecy which this entailed, and to relegate its composition to a time when Cyrus was already in the field, so that a surmise could reasonably be hazarded of his victorious advance against Babylon. This led, of course, to a minute scrutiny of these twenty-seven chapters, to discover if possible some subsidiary arguments to corroborate the " foregone conclusion " ; and it were strange indeed if, in the longest prophecy in the Bible, none such could be found. These have been so frequently repeated and added to by a succession of critics, that by dint of reiteration they have come to be accepted almost without question,; so that a student entering on the investigation of the question for the first time can scarce fail to be prepossessed by the array of authorities in their favour. This prepossession alone can account for other scholars who believe in the inspiration of Scripture holding themselves constrained, in the interests, as they conceive, of truth and impartial criticism, to accept the later date. The prophet commences at once by mapping out his subject into three great divisions. By the course of disci- plinary training to which Jehovah is about to subject Israel, beginning with the captivity iu Babylon, Jerusalem is com- forted by the assurance that three successive objects, or important results, are to be attained in fulfilment of the mission appointed to Israel as the ' ' servant of the Lokd " — which, to mark the certainty of their ultimate accomplish- ment, are represented as already fulfilled to Jerusalem by the use of the prophetic Perfect instead of the Future, viz. : I. That her warfare is accomplished. II. That the punishment of her iniquity is accepted. 12 THE SERVANT OF THE LOED. III. That she has received from the Lord's hand double for all her sins. These several objects or topics, it will be seen, carry us on to the final consummation of God's purposes w^ith Israel, a,nd suggest at once that the prophet's view cannot be bounded by the deliverance from Babylon. This would be no subject worthy of a prophet to make known. His high function is not mere "vaticination" of future events — that Israel was to be sent to Babylon and to be again brought back, and Jerusalem to be rebuilt — but to reveal the jj?n-- jMses which God designs by His dealings with His people, and the part which it is theirs to contribute for their fulfil- ment. So systematically is the programme sketched by the prophet carried out, that each of the three topics is first repeated in a different form in xl. 3-11, three verses being assigned to each ; and each is then fully treated in a separate Book, or Act, as we might call it, of the dramatic representation placed before us, consisting of nine chapters or three trilogies — the central trilogy of each being charac- terized by a leading personage or actor, through whom the object proposed is principally to be carried out : first, Cyeus (xliii. to xlv.) ; then, Messiah (Hi. to liv.) ; finally, Zion glorified, and "new heavens and a new earth created" (Ixi. to Ixiii.), with a distinct allusion also made in the central trilogy of each Book to the terms of the respective topics as stated in the opening words. This remarkable symmetry (be it noted) of the chapters, or subdivisions, of all the three sections, in which the prophet so carefully carries out the plan which he had sketched out at the beginning, by dividing each section or Book into three trilogies, and in the central trilogy of each i-eferring specially to the topic of the Book, furnishes a sufficient refutation of the fanciful theory of interpolations and emendations sup- posed to be introduced by a series of soferim or scribe- editors. No chapter can be added, none subtracted, without destroying the sjinmetry of the whole. CHAPTERS XL.-LXVI. 13 In further proof that the prophet had the whole plan of his arrangement before his mind from the first, we find that he places each of the three topics before his readers in a different aspect in the succeeding nine verses (3-11) of chapter xL, three verses being assigned to each ; his object being to emphasize that it is to the Lord Himself and to His word and power that Israel (while called upon to contribute their part) must look for the certain and effective fulfilment of the gracious ends to be attained by the disciplinary training to which He is about to subject them. The first eleven verses of chaptend. thus evidently form the exordium, or prologue, to the whole prophecy, mai-king out its division into three Books, or Acts, the relation of which to each other is, as those acquainted with the significance of the threefold division in Scripture know to be the usual arrangement ; — Act I. (xl.-xlviii,), or the predicted deliverance of Israel from Babylon through Cyrus (demonstrative, when fulfilled, of Jehovah's sole title to Godhead, and of the vanity of idols), is but introductory and preparatory to Act II. (xlix.-lvii.), which contains the great central subject, the advent of the true "Servant of the Lord," whose work ultimately finds its consummation in Act III. (Iviii.-lxvi.), or the full and final restoration and glory of ZioN, and the creation of " new heavens and a new earth " (Ixv. 17). So far from the truth is the prevailing idea of Isaiah's message to Jerusalem in his last great prophecy (chaps, xl.- Ixvi.), that it may be said to be directly the reverse. The sentence had at length gone forth which the prophet was commissioned to announce to Ilezekiah when, in the pride of his heart, he had shown all his treasures to the ambas- sadors of Merodach-Baladan,kingof Babylon, that all these should be carried to Babylon, and his sons serve as eunuchs in the king's palace. According to the mind of the prophet, as the critics maintain, this was to be but a temporary 14 THE SEKVANT OF THE LORD, suffering which would soon pass over. The Lord would quickly return at the head of His people to Jerusalem, and the final glorification of Zion shortly follow.^ So long as views like these prevail, little or no progress ■can be expected in ti'acing out the connection and line of argument in the last great prophecy of the evangelical prophet. The whole twenty-seven chapters (xl.-lxvi.) (as already ■stated, see pp. 11, 12) are divided by the prophet, with re- markable symmetry, into three sections, or books, as Ewald •calls them, by the recurrence of the refrain, " No peace, •saith the Lokd, to the wicked". These books consist of nine chapters each ; and these, again, are subdivided into three parts, consisting of three chapters each, or (to furnish a simpler means of following the classification) each section, or book, is divided into three trilogies, consisting of three ■chapters each : Book I. Chaps, xl. to xlii.; xliii. to xlv.; xlvi. to xlviii. Book II. Chaps, xlix to li.; lii. to liv.; Iv. to Ivii. Book III. Chaps. Iviii. to Ix.; Ixi. to Ixiii.; Ixiv. to Ixvi. The subjects of this threefold division are stated at the very commencement (xl. 2), showing that the prophet had formed the whole plan of his argument from the first. In order to comfort Jerusalem under the severe judgments impending over her, it is announced that by the course of severe discipline on which she was now entering, beginning with the captivity of Babylon, the great purposes of her calling will finally be accomplished. In the prologue, however, which ends with verse 11, the prophet, before proceeding to the proof of each topic of consolation, repeats each in different words, assigning to each three verses, for the purpose of enforcing on Israel the certainty of their fulfilment, yet through no wisdom or ^ See the views of Drs. Delitzsch and A. B. Davidson, quoted in pp. 6, 7. CHAPTEES XL.-LXVI. 15 power of their own, but solely because "the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it" (verse 5) ; because " the word of our God shall stand for ever" (verse 8) ; because "the Lord God [Himself] shall come, and His arm shall rule for Him " (verse 10). " The glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together" (verse 5). But " all flesh is grass " (verse 6), weak and perishable, and Israel is no exception. " Surely the people is grass " (verse 7), and can accomplish nothing of itself ; nevertheless, " the word of our God shall stand for ever" (verse 8). How exactly the prophet had his whole plan in his mind from the first, and how systematically he carries it out, may be seen from the detailed references we now give. I. Beferences to Cyrus in the central trilogy of Book I, (chaps, xliii. to xlv.). In chap, xliii. : "For your [Israel's] sake I have sent to Babylon" (verse 14). In chap. xliv. : "That saith of Cyrus : He is My shepherd, and shall perform all My pleasure ; even saying of Jerusa- , lem : She shall be built ; and to the temple : Thy foundation shall be laid " (verse 28). In chap. xlv. : " Thus saith the Lord to His anointed, to Cyrus, I will go before Thee . . . and break in pieces the doors of brass, and cut in sunder the bars of iron . . . that thou mayest know that I am the Lord, which call thee hy thy name. I have surnamed thee, though thou hast not known My name. I am the Lord, and there is none else beside Me, there is no God . . . that they [not only Thou, but all the Gentile world (see Ezra i. 1-4)] may know from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that there is none beside Me (verses 1-7). I have raised him up in righteous- ness ... he shall build My city, and he shall let My exiles go free, not for price nor reward, saith the Lord of Hosts " (verse 13). 16 THE SERVANT OF THE LORD. II. Beferences to Messiah in the central trilogy of Book 11. (chaps. Hi. to liv.). In chap. lii. : "How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him that bringeth good tidings " (comp. xl. 9), " that saith unto Zion : Thy God reigneth " (comp. xl. 9-10). In chap. liii. (which should begin with chap. lii. 13 to 15, and thus show the connexion of lii. 15 with liii. 1) : He shall sprinkle many nations [as their High Priest] ; kings [of the Gentiles] shall shut their mouths at Him : For that which had not been told them, they have seen ; And that which they had not heard, they have con- sidered. Who [of us Jews] have believed what we heard ? And to whom hath the arm of the Lord been revealed ? III. Beferences to Zion glorified in the central trilogy of Book III. (chaps. Ixi. to Ixiii.) In chap. Ixi., the Messiah assures Zion that the Loed [Himself] hath anointed Me to preach glad tidings to the meek, to proclaim liberty to the captives, the opening of the prison to them that are bound". These are the promises made to Israel in xlii. 7 (cf. verse 22), but for the attainment of which they proved themselves unequal through unbelief, and which, therefore, Messiah, as the true " Servant of the LoBD," takes their place (xlviii. 16) to fulfil, in the first in- stance, that they may be prepared, by entering into His mind and spirit, to follow the example of their Head at a future period (Eom. xi. 15, and 25 to 27). In chap. Ixii. : "For Zion's sake will I not hold My peace" (verse 1). "Thou shalt no more be termed For- saken, neither shall thy land any more be termed Desolate ; but thou shalt be called Hephzi-bah ( = my delight is in her), and thy land Beulah ( = married) ; for the Lobd delighteth in thee, and thy land shall be married " (verse 4). CHAPTERS XL.-LXVI. 17 With chap. Ixiii. 1-6, the prophecy ends ' with the destruction of Israel's most inveterate enemy, Edom (exactly as in the earher prophecies, chap, xxxiv.), who, in the moment of Israel's lowest depression, had raised the malignant cry : " Ease it, rase it, even to the foundation thereof " (Ps. cxxxvii. 7). But how, it will be asked, could our orthodox critics have been so far carried away by the representations of the Naturalistic critics as to imagine that Isaiah could have thought that, with the return from Babylon, all God's purposes with Israel were on the eve of being accomplished ? Perhaps the view propounded by Hitzig furnishes the best representation of the difficulty. His view is that " prophets were bounded like other men by the horizon of their own age : they borrowed the object of their soothsaying from their present, and, excited by the relations of their present, they spoke to their contemporaries of what affected other people's minds or their own, occupying themselves only with that future whose rewards or punishments were likely to reach their contemporaries. For exegesis the position is impregnable that the prophetic writings are to be inter- preted in each case out of the relations belonging to the time of the prophet ; and from this follows as a corollary the critical canon : that that time, those time-relations, out of which a prophetic writer is explained are his time, his time-relations ; to that time he must be referred as the date of his own existence" (Hitzig, pp. 463-468). A most ingenious mixture of truth and fallacy is here presented to us, which it is essential to disentangle. The truth w^hich it contains, and under cover of which the fallacy hopes to pass undetected, we have already endorsed. 1 All that follows (chap. Ixiii. 7 to the close) is a confession of Israel's sin, and a prayer for forgiveness, which the prophet offers lip in their name, with the answer given him by God. Compare Daniel's confession and praj'er for his people in chap, ix., and the answer given him by God. 2 18 THE SERVANT OF THE LORD. that a prophet speaks specially to those of his own time — in other words, that it will be no wiconnected event in the distant future which he is commissioned to reveal, but one which has a distinct and apposite bearing on the immediate occasion w^hich causes him to speak. The fallacy lies in asserting that "prophets were bounded by the horizon of their own age," and that they can " occupy themselves," or others, "only with that future whose rewards or punish- ments were likely to reach their contemporaries ". This asser- tion runs directly counter to what experience had taught to be the general characteristic of prophecy from the earliest down to the latest — namely, that scarcely any great prophecy has been fulfilled in the generation to \vhich it was spoken. Take, for instance, the first prophecy, in Gen. iii. 15. Was the "head" of the serpent "bruised" in the lifetime of Adam and Eve ? Were "all the nations of the earth blessed " before the death of Abraham? In the song attributed to Moses, in Deut. xxxii., we find an explicit prediction that, in consequence of Israel's addiction to idolatry, provoking Jehovah " to jealousy with that w'hich is not God," and by their obstinate resistance to His claims to their individual allegiance, the time would come when He would reject and move them to jealousy with those which are not a people (verse 21), by the adoption of the Gentiles in their stead, as St. Paul explains it. If this canon of prophetic exegesis is to be our rule, our critics have sadly erred in bringing down the date of Deuteronomy only to the age of Josiah. It must have been written in Christian times. Some Christian Jew, living at the time when they " were moved to jealousy," must have been its author, who was desirous of magnifying the prophetic foresight of the great lawgiver of Israel by passing off his own composition as his ! St. Paul, again, in revealing the "mystery" why "blindness in part is happened to Israel," in Eom. xi., where he sketches in prophetic outline the whole course of Israel's history from his own day down to their ultimate conversion and restora- CHAPTERS XL.-LXVI. 19 tion again to a place in the kingdom of God, must have known that ages were to elapse before the prophecy he uttered could be fulfilled, since the destruction of their city had not yet taken place, nor their dispersion, which was to continue until " the fulness of the Gentiles be come in " (verse 25), tvhen only the time would come that " all Israel shall be saved" (verse 26). How does the " critical canon " square with such a prophecy, that " to that time must he [the prophet] be referred as the date of his own existence " ? And yet St. Paul was speaking to those of Jiis oivn time, and this prediction of an event in the far-distant future had an immediate bearing on those w^hom he addressed, as his own words testify : " I speak ... if by any means I may pro- voke to jealousy them that are my flesh, and may save some of them " (verses 13, 14, Eev. Ver.). The main object of prophecy is not to foretell the future, but to prepare men for entering into the purposes of God in His dealings with them, and in His government of the world. Prophecy, therefore, will ever tend to pass beyond the limits of the immediate future, and to point the thoughts and hopes of the hearers to the final triumph of good over evil, and the complete consummation of God's gracious plan for the redemption of a fallen world. It is to our confining our views too much to the return of the captive Jews from Babylon, as if this were the principal subject of the last twenty -seven chapters of Isaiah, in place of its being a mere preliminary and subordinate topic, that is to be ascribed in great measure, I believe, the failure to compre- hend and interpret aright the grand and far-reaching con- ceptions of the evangelical prophet. One of the passages much insisted upon as carrying us far beyond the age of Isaiah, is chapter Ixiv. 10, 11. " Thy holy cities are a wilderness, Zion is a wilderness, Jerusalem a desolation. Our holy and our beautiful house, where our fathers praised Thee, is burned up with fire ; and all our pleasant things are laid waste." This appears at first sight 20 THE SERVANT OF THE LORD. formidable ; to some conclusive. But in the first place, we must remember that Isaiah had already announced to Hezekiah that all was to be carried to Babylon ; and it scarce required any additional inspiration to assure him and others that the first thing a heathen conqueror would do would be to set fire to the hated temple of Jehovah (who claimed Divinity as belonging to Himself alone, and who branded all other gods as pretenders, mere dumb and powerless stocks of wood or graven images), and to lay desolate His land. But further, if it be urged that the words prove that the ruin of temple and city had already taken place, what are we to make of the many other passages that imply the contrary ? The failure in sacrificial service charged on Israel in such a passage as xliii. 23 — )" Thou hast not brought Me the small cattle of thy burnt- ofi"erings ; neither hast thou honoured Me with thy sacri- fices" — it is far more natural to refer to a time when such sacrifices could be offered, than to the exile, when the rebuke seems pointless, if there was no temple and no altar where to bring their offerings. The offering of sacrifices appears to be matter of daily observance at the time of the writer, if we are to judge from the words of Ixvi. 3 : " He that killeth an ox is as if he slew a man ; he that sacrificeth \ a lamb as if he cut off a dog's neck ; he that offereth an 1 oblation as if he offered swine's blood ; he that burneth ' incense as if he blessed an idol". But if it be possible to explain away these passages as referring to the past, what are we to make of the last clause of verse 20 of this chapter Ixvi., where the future offering to be brought when "they shall bring all your brethren for an offering unto the Lord out of all nations" is compared to an offering brought "in a clean vessel into the house of the Lord " ? This seems in all fairness to admit of no other interpretation than that the latter offering is at present, at the date of the author's writing, in the daily habit of being brought into the temple — "as the Children of Israel bring an offering [Hebr., CHAPTEKS XL.-LXVI. 21 ' the meal-offering,' ham-niiiichaJi] in a clean vessel into the house of the Lord ". If the writer of these chapters lived in Babylonia, how unnatural would it be in him, as even Ewald remarks, to speak of "the northern parts of the Chaldean kingdom,", from which Abraham was called, as " the utmost ends of the ; earth" (chap. xli. 9), and as a "far country" that from which! Cyrus was called " (xlvi. 11)? Where in the alluvial plains of Babylonia are the torrent ^'valleTjs" to be found under the clefts of the rocks (Ivii. 5), or "the smooth stones of the stream " (verse 6), or " the lofty and high mountain " whither the reproach is addressed to Israel, " Thou wentest up to offer sacrifice" (verse 7)? According to Ewald and Bleek, ^' the whole of the discourse " in which these last passages occur (Ivi. 9 down to Ivii. 11) "is a quotation from an older prophet of the time of Manasseh, or soon after," and Pro- fessor Cheyne adds : " The strikingly Palestinian character of the scenery in Ivii. 5-7, and the correspondence of the sins imputed to the people with pre-exilic circumstances, give a strong plausibility to this hypothesis ". Some of the facts, in short, are too stubborn and intractable to accom- modate themselves to our critics' theory of the late date of the prophecy. Mais tant yis i^our les faits. What will in no wise explain away, must be summarily discarded as interpolations. Ewald's list of passages which he denies to have been written by " the Great Unnamed " are xl. 1-2 ; lii. 13 to liv. 12 ; Ivi. 9 to Ivii. 11 ; Iviii. 1 to lix. 20. This, Professor Cheyne considers, " cannot be complained of on the score of excessive [!] analysis "} He has ready an explanation of the source of all these interpolations. "It is becoming more and more certain that the present form, especially of the prophetic Scriptures, is due to a literary class (the so-called soferim, ' scribes ' or ' scripturists '), whose principal function was collecting and supplementing the scattered records of prophetic revelation. This function ^ Prophecies (f Is'tinh, vol. ii., p. 215. 22 THE SERVANT OF THE LORD. they performed with rare self-abnegation. . . . They wrote, they recast, they edited, in the same spirit in which a gifted artist of our own day devoted himself to the glory of ' modern painters '." ^ It might have been well if Professor Cheyne had given us his authorities for this new discovery, unknown, as it is, to some of our best Talmudic scholars (as more than one of them have assured me), and directly opposed to what till lately has been the general opinion. To quote only from Dr. Smith's Dictionary of the Bible under Scribes: "They set their faces steadily to maintain the Law and the Prophets, to exclude from all equality with them the ' many books ' of which ' there is no end ' (Eccles. xii. 12) ". " They would write nothing of their own, lest less worthy words should be raised to a level with those of the oracles of God." ^ It will require overwhelming evidence to render it credible that the divinely inspired words of the prophets, so deeply reverenced by the Jews, were tampered with in this free and easy manner by a set of scribes, for all and each of whom, too, Professor Cheyne claims Divine inspiration ! A strange inspiration truly, which left the original communications so imperfect and faulty as to call for correction by a succession of inspired Eevisers to supple- ment and alter them, and who, after all, so marred and bungled the work that our advanced Higher Critics must prescribe to all of them what they ought to have written ! We cannot but entertain the hope that a scholarly critic like Professor Cheyne, who has already shown his inde- pendence of judgment in casting aside, in his later work on Isaiah, several of the views in which he had too servilely followed Ewald in his earlier volume on Isaiah, and who evinces so much candour and love of truth, will be led to see the necessity, for the sake of younger students, of discountenancing a licence of imagination, which gives free scope to the fancy of each individual, and which can never attain to any conclusion that will satisfy others. The ex- ^ Pro2)hecies of Isaiah, p. 214. - Taken from Jost's Judenthum- CHAPTERS XL.-LXVI. 23 positor disqualifies himself for coming to any sound and satisfactory result, who starts with the idea " that it is possible that it may some day become an approximate certainty that the latter part of II. Isaiah was once much shorter, and that the author, or one of the soferim, enlarged it by the insertion of passages from other prophets, intro- ducing, at the same time, an artificial semblance of unity by the insertion of a slightly altered version of the gnomic saying in xlviii. 22, as a refrain in Ivii. 21 " } The first postulate, in forming a theory that will stand the test, is to accept of all the facts as we find them ; and then only can we flatter ourselves that we have reached the true solution when we have accounted for the ivhole of the data, or ele- ments of the problem. But before proceeding even yet to try to follow out the line of argument traced by the prophet, it may be of advan- tage to the reader to be warned of some of the false views which have misled our best modern interpreters, as well as of some points which, if not borne in mind^ are apt to create difficulty to the ordinary reader. 1. It is evident that if this prophecy is all the work of one author, the standpoint which he takes up, and which he wishes his readers to take up, will not be always the same, but will vary with the object that he desires to place before his readers at the time. One main object, undoubt- edly, was to convince Israel of their great sin in their inveterate propensity to idolatry, and of the certainty of the severe sentence that had gone forth from the Lord of their being driven from their land, and subjected to the oppression of idolatrous Babylon, in order that they might see and feel the loathsomeness of idolatry, and be taught by this experience to abhor and renounce it. To impress this vividly on their minds, the prophet's most usual stand- point will be the soil of Babylon itself. His aim will be to throw himself and his readers in medias res, as if the captivity ^ Cheyne's Isaiah, vol. ii., p. 217. 24 THE SERVANT OF THE LORD. were already present, and, as Dr. Delitzsch expresses it, to make himself and them " lead a pneumatic life among the exiles".^ This, accordingly, is the standpoint which the prophet takes up in the first chapter of the opening trilogy (xl. to xlii.), where Israel, now regarded as in the midst of their idolatrous oppressors, is ready to despond at the thought of their inability to withstand the greater temptation, as it might seem to them, to follow the idolatrous practices around them, and is on the point of giving over the effort in despair (xl. 27). But the prophet is not necessarily to be confined to one standpoint, but will vary it according to his subject. 2. Another difficulty which a Western reader is likely at first to find is that of entering into the meaning of the figurative language common to all Oriental poets, accustomed as we are to interpret literally, and of mere material things, the images used by the prophets in order to shadow forth higher and spiritual truths. Thus, in the very first verses of these twenty-seven chapters, " The voice of one crying in the widerness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make straight in the desert a highway for our God ; every valley," &c., the commentators generally interpret " the wilderness " of the Syrian desert through which the Israel- ites had to pass in returning to Palestine.^ The figure, indeed, is probably taken from the desert through which the Israelites had to pass on their first coming up from Egypt. But where, as we before remarked, page 21, are there to be found in the Syrian desert mountains to be levelled, valleys to be filled up ? A very little comparison with Isaiah's language would have shown that the desert meant a moral wilderness, and that the state of Israel and condition of Zion was what the prophet desired to place before the eyes of the hearers (c/. chap. li. 3): " The Lord hath comforted Zion : He hath comforted all her waste 1 Delitzsch's Israel, vol. ii., p. 138. T. & T. Clark, Edinburgh. - See Dr. Adam Clarke's laboured attempt to prove that the Syrian desert was meant. CHAPTERS XL.-LXVI. 25 places ; and He hath made her wilderness like Eden, and her desert like the garden of the Lord ; joy and gladness shall be found therein, thanksgiving and the voice of melody". When the Lord commands (chap. xl. 3), "Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make straight in the desert a highway for our God,'' they were no mere material mountains that Israel had to level, or valleys to raise up, in order that the Lord might return to His Zion. The obstructions that they had to help in removing in the way of the Lord's return to Zion were the lofty mountains of pride they had to bring down and all that exalted itself against their God ; everything that was mean and debased had to be raised up, the crooked to be made straight: in short, as the figurative expressions of the prophet : " Prepare ye the way of the Lord," that the King may return to His people, were translated into plain prose by John the Baptist: " Eepent [prepare ye the way of the Lord by a change of heart] , for the kingdom of God is at hand ". 3. Another common mistake necessary to be corrected is confounding Zion with the people of Israel, as meaning sometimes the whole mass of Israel ; at others, the better or believing portion. Zion, as Dr. Hengstenberg has shown, never means the exiled Zionites, or mere inhabitants of Jerusalem, but is always the ideal site of God's holy city, or the mother of His children. This error has been cor- rected in the Eevised Version, as will be seen in examining chap. xl. 9, where Jerusalem, who had been wandering as a desolate widow, around God's Holy Temple, is represented as being called upon to go up and announce the coming of the Lord on Mount Zion.^ ^ Zion evidently is regarded as now " in the latter days (chap, ii. 2) established in the top of the mountains, and exalted above the hills " : when " all nations shall flow into it. And many peoples shall go and say, Come ye and let us go up to the mountain of the Lord. ... for oiat of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem" : N.B. — "Zion" must not be con- founded with " Mount Zion," the latter being always the Temple Mount (Moriah). 26 THE SERVANT OF THE LORD. Keeping these preliminary observations in view, the reader, it is hoped, will now be prepared to follow the con- solatory arguments and proofs which the prophet places before Israel, that God will make the difficulties and severe sufferings, of which they are so much afraid, the very means of learning three great lessons necessary in order to fulfil the missioii for which they were chosen by God ; namely, to be a "kingdom of priests unto the Lokd — a holy nation" (Exod. xix. 6). These three lessons or objects were, as we have already seen : I. They had to " accomplish a warfare '' against idolatry ; II. They had to " accept of the punishment of their iniquity " ; III. They had to receive double for all their sins. To each of these objects, successively, in the first trilogy (xl. 12 to xlii.), a separate chapter is devoted : To the first, chap. xl. 12-31 ; to the second, chap. xli. ; to the third, chap. xlii. ; ^ and in each the argument is taken from regard to God's prescient wisdom, and predisposing _2^o«'e?" displayed in His character or works : In the 1st (chap. xl. 12-31) — as the Author of Creation. In the 2nd (chap, xli.) — as the Author of Providence. In the 3rd (chap, xlii.) — as the Author of Eedemption. The necessity for clearing away the numerous misleading prepossessions with which the rationalistic critics have suc- ceeded in mystifying the minds of even our best orthodox interpreters must be our excuse for the length of these pre- liminary observations. And now that it is hoped the Bibli- cal student may be, in some degree, prepared for following, without prejudice, the course of the argument, as stated by the prophet, let us inquire what is the import of each of the three topics of consolation which he places before his countrymen. 1 Besides the fuller exposition of each in the central trilogy of each of the three Books : xliii. to xlv. ; Hi. to liv. ; Ixi. to Ixiii. CHAPTERS XL.-LXVI. 27 I. The first and indispensable purpose of God's disci- plinary training for Israel, before any further progress could be made, is that their jj^^^^ tsav'd, "warfare" must be "accomplished". This word has generally been interpreted to mean nothing more than the " long period of hardship," or the " hard service," which Israel was to endure at Baby- lon. This is very far from expressing the true meaning of the term. It forms, as we might expect, the keynote of the whole prophecy, comprehending the whole work and mission of Israel, as the "sei-vant of the Loed". What, then, is the meaning of the word ? On turning to the first three chapters of the Book of Numbers, we find that it is applied to military service, or the service which Israel as " God's soldier," or champion {Gesenius' Lexicon) has to render to Him as His w^arriors in conquering the idolatrous Canaan- ites, and taking possession of their land which He had promised to Abraham and his seed for their inheritance. (See Numb. i. 20, 22-24, &c., "all that were able to go forth to war [service]". Cf. Numb. xxxi. 14; Josh. xxii. 12; and 1 Sam. xxviii. 1.) But in Numb. iv. 23 : " All that enter in to iccdt iipon the service, to do the work in the tent of meeting " ; and in viii. 25, the same words, both verb and noun, are applied to the tahernacle-SQVv\Q,e. The service, therefore, which Israel has to render to Jehovah was a double service. First, a ivar-%exwice, to fight the battles of the Lokd, a warfare against idols, idolatry, and idolators, and all the enemies of Jehovah, as their King ; and secondly, a tabernacle-service, paying ever the worship due to Him as their God. But both of these, it will be observed, are exactly the service and calling prescribed to Israel from their first establishment as a people (Exod. xix. 6) : " Ye shall be unto Me a kingdom of priests, a holy nation," a kingdom and nation, themselves giving entire submission to Jehovah as their King, and leading all others into submission to Him ; 28 THE SERVANT OF THE LORD, "priests and holy," ministering in holiness unto the Lord, and persuading others to join in His service ; for the promise to their forefather Abraham was : "In thy seed all the nations of the earth shall be blessed ". Such was the double " service " which Israel was called to render to Jehovah; — hence so often styled the " servant of the Lord" (xH. 8, 9; xlii. 19 ; xliii. 10; xliv. 1, 2, 21, &c.). II. The second topic of comfort is that Israel accept of the punishment of her iniquity. To ascertain the meaning of this expression we have to turn to Levit. xxvi. 41-43, the only other passage in which it occurs, and from which it is evidently taken. There, as here in Isaiah, in view of the severe judgments denounced against the sin of Israel, a hope of their reversal is held out, and the condition is stated on which it would be granted : " If their uncircumcised heart be humbled, and they then accept of the punishment of their iniquity " ^ (Levit. xxvi. 41, and verse 43 is to the same effect). The view which this gives us of the expression, as employed in Isaiah, makes it ^ That 'CivOn (Heb. "lii^) has the meaning of " punishment of iniquity " (as rendered in both the Authorized and Eevised Versions), or, more correctly, " penalty due to iniquity," whether paid or not, " guilt-debt " or " indebtedness " (Germ. ISchuld), we gather from its first occiirrence in the Bible in Gen. iv. 13, where it is much more in accordance with Cain's frame of mind to translate as in both versions : " My punishment is greater than I can bear," than in the margin : "Mine iniquity is greater than can be forgiven" ; as indeed his own words in verse 14 (arising more from fear of con- sequences, than from true repentance) prove. The usual meaning of 71)^'^ rc'dsdh, when employed as here in X T reference to sin, is to accept an offering or sacrifice as a compensa- tion for it ; as in Levit. i. 4 : " And it [the burnt-offering] shall be accepted for him, to make atonement for him ". See Levit. vii. 18 ; xxii. 23, 25, 27 ; Micah vi. 7 : " Will the Lord he pleased with thou- sands of rams '? " Gf. Malachi i. 10. In Levit. xxvi. 41, 43, the meaning therefore is : " If they then accept of their penalty as the jiTst compensation for their iniquity ". And even the other use of it in verse 43, "The land shall enjoy her Sabbaths," is but another instance of the same figure = the land shall accept of her Sabbaths, by lying desolate as a compensation for those withheld from her. CHAPTERS XL.-LXVr. 29 include more than what is generally assigned to it. The acceptance of the punishment is usually explained exclu- sively of God, whereas in Leviticus it is clearly an act required also of Israel. The manifest reference to Leviticus determines this to be the leading thought, though as in the first topic the double meaning is, I believe, designed by the prophet, since both are most distinctly brought out in chap, liii., the central chapter of the central trilogy of the second book, the purport of which is to expand and illustrate this the second or central topic of consolation. The meaning therefore of the expression, "That the punishment of her iniquity is accepted," is that it is accepted by both parties as a fit compensation, first by God, as an adequate atone- ment paid by the Messiah, who, on Israel's refusing to take this second step (after being six times called upon to "hear" [or "hearken"], in chap, xlviii. 1, 6, 8, 12, 14, 16), at last comes forward and takes Israel's place as the Lord's servant in verse 6, with the words : " x\nd now the Lord God hath sent me and His Spirit ". This, it will be evident, makes a much more severe de- mand on the part of Israel than the first service. To accomplish the warfare against idolatry called more for an intellectual than moral effort, as is evident from the case of the Mahomedans. But to " accept of the punish- ment of iniquity " as the justly merited compensation for our sin, requires a humbling acknowledgment and confes- sion of our guilt, against which the pride of human nature revolts, and which, as we shall afterwards see, Israel refused to make till it had first been rendered and exemplified by Messiah's taking their place (chap, xlviii. 16) as the servant of the Lord, and submitting voluntarily (chap. liii. 7) to the Lord's " laying upon Him the punishment of the iniquity of us all " (liii. 6). Then, and then only, through the strength given to us by the Saviour, can the members of Christ's Israel accept of this difficult part of their required service. III. The third purpose of God's disciplinary training 30 THE SEEVANT OF THE LORD. for Israel is '' that she hath received double for all her sins ". This, like the other two topics of comfort, would seem to have a twofold application. If we compare Jeremiah xvi. 18, speaking of the restoration of Israel after their captivity, God says : " And first I will recompense [the punishment of] their iniquity and their sin double" (c/. xvii. 18). To under- stand the justice and the consolatory import of this announce- ment, we must remember that sin is double— (1) because it leaves God's will undone; and (2) because of the actual wrongdoing; and therefore under the law "for every matter of trespass" a man had to "pay double unto his neighbour" (Exod. xxii. 9), Compare Jeremiah ii. 13: " My people have committed two evils : they have forsaken Me, the fountain of living waters, and have hewn out for themselves cisterns, broken cisterns that can hold no water ". There can be no feeling of true peace, till the claims, on both sides, of justice and mercy are adjusted. In this view the " receiving double " must be consenting to it as duly merited and paid, so that thus the sinner, by the double experience in suffering, may be prepared and made meet for receiving double recompense in blessing (Isaiah Ixi. 7).^ See Zechariah ix. 12 : " Turn ye to the stronghold, ye prisoners of hope, even to-day do I declare that I will render double unto thee ". The distinction between " accepting of the punishment of iniquity " and " receiving double for sin " will be seen at once by reference to 2 Sam. xii. 1-14. Immediately on David's "accepting the punishment of his iniquity," and penitently confessing, " I have sinned against the Lord," Nathan was commissioned to say, " The Lord also hath put away thy sin ; thou shalt not die " (verse 13). But this ^ Compare for these double meanings, of which Isaiah is so fond (" Janus-words," as Prof. Chej'ne aptly calls them in Isaiah ix. 24), Hhear-jashub, Isaiah x. 21, 22. This forms another proof of the identity of the authorship of the earlier and the later prophecies of Isaiah. CHAPTERS XL.-LXVI. 31 by no means exempts the penitent from " receiving double for all his sins ". More than one reason may account for this. The deepening the penitent's own sense of the evil of sin may require such disciplinary training. ' ' Because thou hast despised the word of the Loed, to do the evil thing in His sight, ^ therefore the sword shall never depart from thine house" (verses 9-10). But besides the infliction may be required as a salutary warning and example to oljhers to refrain from sin. " Howbeit, because by this deed thou hast given great occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme, the child also that is born unto thee shall surely die" (verse 14). In order to counteract the fears which even the better part of Israel w^ould entertain (what can any efforts of ours avail against the famed wisdom of the Chaldeans and the idolatrous ])oicer of Babylon's world-empire?), the prophet sets before them the infinite superiority of Jehovah, as Creator, possessed of all prescient wisdom to devise, and all predisposing iMiver to accomplish the promised deliverance and blessings and to impart these gifts to His servants. The arrangement of chap. xl. is as follows. Verses 12-31 of chap. xl. are divided by the refrain in verses 18 and 25, "To whom then will ye liken God?" kc, into three strophes of six verses each, which again are each subdivided into three verses relating, the first three to loisdom, and the second three to poiver. Placed first and last as the principal subject, strophe i. (verses 12-17), and strophe iii. (verses 26-31), set forth Jehovah's wisdom and power as Creator; while the want of these, the folly and 230werlessness of idols and idol worshippers, occupies the more obscure position in the intermediate strophe (verses 19-24). 1 For the exact meaning of this expression, see my remarks on Psalm li. in Symmetrical Structure of Scripture, pp. 123 to 127. 32 THE SERVANT OF THE LORD. I. WJio can compare with God in Knowledge ? XL. 12. "Who hath measured the waters in the hollow of His hand, And meted out heaven with the span, And comprehended the dust of the earth in a measure, And weighed the mountains in scales, and the hills in a balance ? 13. Who hath directed the Spirit of Jehovah, Or being His counsellor, hath taught Him ? 14. "With whom took He counsel, and who instructed Him And taught Him in the path of judgment, And taught Him knowledge, And showed to Him the way of understanding ? IFho call compare ivith Him in Power '? 15. Behold, the nations are as a drop of a bucket, And are counted as the small diist of the balance ; Behold, He taketh iip the isles a^a very little thing. 16. And Lebanon is not sufficient to burn, Nor the beasts thereof sufficient for a bm'nt-offermg. 17. All the nations are as nothing before Him : They are counted to Him less than nothing and vanity. 18. To whom then will ye liken God ? Or what likeness will ye compare imto Him ? II. Is it to the knowledge of the idol-maker you look as so formidable ? 19. The graven image, a workman melted it, And the goldsmith spreadeth it over with gold And casteth for it silver chains. 20. He that is too impoverished for sxich an oblation Chooseth a tree that will not rot ; He seeketh unto him a ciuming workman To set up a graven image, that shall not be inoved. 21. Have ye^ not kno%vn ? Have ye not heard ? Have ye not imderstood from the f omidations of the earth ? Or to the idolators' vain power ? 22. It is He that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, And the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers ; That stretcheth oiit the heavens as a cm-tain, And spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in ; 1 i.e. even ye Gentiles. Compare in contrast with this : " Hast thou not known ? " (verse 28), addressed to Israel. CHAPTER XL. 33 23. That bringeth princes to nothing ; He maketh the judges of the earth as vanity. 24. Yea, thej' have not been planted ; Yea, the}' have not been sown ; Yea, their stock hath not taken root in the earth ; And, moreover. He bloweth upon them and they witlier, And the whirlwind taketh them away as stubble. 25. To whom then will ye liken Me, That I should be equal to him ? saith the Holy One. III. C'a7i His knowledge /«»7 who numhers the countless hosts of heaven ? 26. Lift up yom* eyes on high. And see who hath created these, That bringeth out their host by number : He calleth them all by name : By the greatness of His might, and for that He is strong in power, Not one is lacking. 27. Why sayest thou, Jacob, And speakest, Israel, My way is hid from Jehovah, And my judgment is passed away from my God ? 28. Hast thou not known ? Hast thou not heard '? An everlasting God is Jehovah, Creator of the ends of the earth. ^ He fainteth not, neither is weary ; There is no searching of His understanding. Or His power be iusufficient to aid the weak ? 29. He giveth power to the faint ; Aiid to him that hath no might he increaseth strength. 30. Even the youths shall faint and be weary, And the young men shall utterly fall ; 31. But they that wait upon the Lord shall renew their strength ; They shall mount up with wings as eagles ; They shall run and not be weary ; They shaU walk and not faint. 1 Professor Cheyne's rendering is much preferable to that of the Revised Version. "Note the accumulation of Divine Titles — 'so many shields against despair'" (Hengstenberg) . 3 34 THE SERVANT OF THE LORD. CHAPTEE XLI. Ill chap. xli. we have a most graphically described scene, the beauty and unity of which have been most unfortunately spoiled by the mistaken interpretation put upon verses 5 to 7 by almost all the commentators. The chapter begins with the challenge which Jehovah addresses to the "islands" and "peoples" with their idols to a contest, to determine " Who has a right to the title of Deity? " — by showing who alone possesses the prescient himolcdge to predict, and the predisposing 'poicer to bring to pass an event in the far remote future. We are to suppose Jehovah and Israel on the one side, and the "islands" and "peoples" with their idols assembling together on the other. Jehovah takes the initiative and addresses them : 1. Keep silence before Me, Islands ; And let the peoples renew their strength : ^ Let them come near ; then let them speak : Let lis draw near together to judgment. Jehovah then announces His purpose of raising up a great king and conqueror, to whom He is to give the commission and power to deliver His people from the idolatrous oppres- sion of Babylon. ^In derisive contrast to the last verse (31st of chap, xl.), "They that wait upon Jehovah shall renew their strength " [through Him]. Jehovah here calls upon the peoples to "renew their strength" themselves, nay, to strengthen their helpless idols, which, so far from aiding them, need themselves to be " fastened with nails that they should not be moved " (verse 7). Turning next to the idols themselves, the challenge is given, " Declare the things that are to come hereafter, that we may know that ye are gods ; yea, do good, or do evil". Finally, once more (to clinch the matter), the Lord repeats again His own claims, and His challenge to His opponents ; and when neither word nor act foUows, He dismisses their pretensions with ineffable scorn : " Behold, aU of them, their works are vanity and nought ; their molten images are wind and confusion ". CHAPTEE XLI. 35 2. AVho hath raised up one from the East, Whom He calleth in righteousness to His foot ? Hk giveth nations before him, He maketh him rule over kings ; He giveth them as the dust to his sword, As the driven stubble to his bow. 3. He pursueth them, and passeth on safely. Even by a way that he had not gone with his feet. 4. Who hath wrought and done it, Calhng the generations from the beginning ? I — Jehovah — the first, And with the last — I am He. 5. The islands looked — and fear ; The ends of the earth tremble ; They dr