LIBRARY OF THE THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY PRINCETON, N. J. Purchased by the Mrs. Robert Lenox Kennedy Church History Fund. Division... D.S23+ Section...#. E,...LS r . '> ’ V- * The Eclipse of the 'Abbasid Caliphate Original Chronicles oj the Fourth Islamic Century Edited, Translated, and Elucidated by H. F. AMEDROZ, Barrister at Law, and D. S. MARGOLIOUTH, D.Litt., F.B.A. VOL. IV. Ojforb: BASIL BLACKWELL, BROAD STREET LONDON: 4 STATIONERS’ HALL COURT, E.C. 4 1921. THE CONCLUDING PORTION OF The Experiences of the Nations BY MISKAWAJEII, Office-holder at the Courts of the Buwaihid Sultans, Mu'izz al-daulah, Rukn al-daulah, and ‘A&ud al-daulah. Translated from the Arabic by D. S. MARGOLIOUTH. VOL. I. REIGNS OF MUQTADIR, QAHIR AND RADI. BASIL BLACKWELL, BROAD STREET. LONDON: 4 STATIONERS’ HALL COURT, E.C. 4 1921 . Printed by FOX, JONES & Co., Kemp Hall Press, OXFORD. APPENDIX The System of Ibn Abi’l-‘Azaqir. From Yaqut’s Dictionary of Learned Men, i. 301. It was found that he claimed to be the Truth of Truth and the God of Gods ; the First, the Ancient; the Outer, the Inner ; the Creator, the Sustainer ; the Perfect, to Whom all notions are entrusted ; he was called The Messiah, even as the Israelites used to call God Almighty the Messiah. He averred that God entered everything according to its capacity, and that He had created the contrary in order that thereby that of which it is the contrary may be indicated ; thus He was revealed in Adam when He created him and in Iblis (Satan), which are two contraries, indicating each other by virtue of their contrariety in notion. He asserted that the guide to the Truth is superior to the Truth, and that the contrary of a thing is nearer to it than its semblance. That when God enters into a human frame, He displays such miracu¬ lous power as proves that it is He ; and that when Adam disappeared the Divinity appeared in five humanities, of which as oft as one disappeared it was replaced by another, and in five Iblises their con¬ traries. Then the Divinity was gathered in. Idris (Enoch) and his Iblis, and was afterwards separated as it had been separated after Adam. It was then united in Noah and his Iblis, and separated when they disappeared as before. It re-united in SaliA and his Iblis, the Slayer of the Camel, and was separated after them ; it re-united in Abraham and his Iblis, Nimrod, and was separated after them. It re-united in Aaron and his Iblis Pharaoh, and was separated again as before. It was re-united in David and his Iblis Goliath, and was separated when they disappeared. It was re-united in Solomon and his Iblis, and was separated afterwards as usual. It was re-united in Jesus and His Iblis, and separated to be re-united in His Disciples and their Iblises. Then it was re-united in ‘Ali son of Abu Talib and his Iblis, and separated afterwards. Finally it was re-united in Ibn Abi’l-Azaqir and his Iblis. He declared that God appears in everything in every notion, that He is in each person in the thought that comes into his mind, so that what is at a distance from him takes shape with him as though he were in its presence, that God is a name for a certain notion, viz., He whom APPENDIX men need is their God 1 ; and this is the principle whereon God should be named in every language. Further, each one of his associates claimed to be the Lord of the next in rank ; he would say I am the Lord of AB and AB of CD ; at the apex was Ibn Abi’l-Azaqir, who called himself Lord of Lords and God of Gods, above whom there was no lord. They did not affiliate i/asan and i7usain to ‘Ali, holding that one in whom the Divinity was united had no parent nor child. They called Moses and Mohammed " the two Traitors,” averring that Aaron had commissioned Moses and ‘Ali Mohammed, and they had betrayed their trust. They maintain that ‘Ali had respited Mohammed the same number of years as the days of the Seven Sleepers, viz., 350; and that at the end of that period there would be a religious revolution. They hold that an Angel ( malak ) is one who controls (malak) himself, knows the Truth and sees it (or Him) ; that the Truth is their Truth, Paradise their knowledge and the embracing of their tenets, Hell ignorance of them, and aversion to their system. They condone omission of Prayer, fasting and ablution, asserting that it is one of God’s favours to His servant to grant him both pleasures at once. Their sexual relations are not regulated by marriage, arrangement or licence, but are promiscuous ; they maintain that as Mohammed was sent to the Qorashite chieftains and Arab champions, whose hearts were hard and spirits proud, there was wisdom in the prostration which he pre¬ scribed for them ; whereas now there is similar wisdom in trying people by promiscuity for their womenfolk ; and that provided a man belong to their sect he may do as he likes in this matter. It is, they hold, desirable for the superior to associate with the inferior in order that the light may be communicated to the inferior. On this subject Ibn Abi’l-Azaqir wrote a book which he called On the Sixth Sense. If a man refuse to follow this principle, he would in the next creation be transformed into a woman. For transmigration was one of his doc¬ trines. He and his followers repudiated the descendants of Abu Talib as they repudiated those of ‘Abbas, they proclaimed themselves only, as the truth was with them and was manifested in them. There follow specimens of letters addressed to Ibn Abi’l- Azaqir and his chief associates by his followers wherein language is applied to the former which the orthodox use only of God. 1 Apparently the theory was that ilah (God) was equivalent to ilaih “ To him.” Corrigenda. 35, 11 Baduriyya read here and elsewhere Baduraya. 153, 4 a.f. 312 read 924. 166, 6 Qudhaf - Qadhaq. 177, 21 Junddisabur- Jundaisabur. 236, 8 a.f. 922 - 322. 440, 9 Canal- River. J THE EXPERIENCES OF THE NATIONS. Chapter I. (2) The Caliphate of al-Muqtadir Billah. Account of the procedure at the proclamation of Ja‘far son of Mu‘tadid, whose kunyah 1 was Abu’l-Fadl, and who was thirteen years of age at the time. When Muktafi's illness grew serious, his vizier 'Abbas b. #asan began to consider whom he should appoint Caliph ; and his choice wavered. On his way from his own palace to that of the Sultan he used to be accompanied by one of the four persons who had charge of the bureaux, viz., Abu ‘Abdallah Mohammed b. Dawud b. Al-Jarrah, Abu’l-#asan Mohammed b. ‘Abdun, Abu’l-TTasan Ibn Al-Furat, and Abu’l- #asan ‘Ali b. ‘Isa. When the first of these was his companion, and was consulted by him on the matter, he nominated Abu'l-‘Abbas ‘Abdallah son of Mu‘tazz, 2 eulogizing his character. The next day his companion was the third of these (Abu’l-iJasan ‘Ali b. Mohammed b. al-Furat), who, when consulted, replied that this was a matter to which he was unaccustomed ; (3) he begged 1 A name of which the first element signifies " father of " or mother of ; and is used as a respectful mode of address even to quite young people. Among modern travellers the Rev. C. T. Wilson [Peasant Life in the Holy Land, 1906, * p. 91) notices the practice in Palestine ; “ sometimes a mere boy is called the ‘ father of So-and-so the name being that of the son which it is hoped he will one day have ; for when a child is born, the parents are known thenceforth not by their own names, but as the ‘ father of So-and-so ’ and the mother of so-and-so’ ”. 2 Caliph 251-265 (a.d. 86Q-869). 2 A.H. 295. Caliphate of Muqtadir. therefore to be excused ; he was accustomed to being consulted only about officials. "Abbas displayed annoy¬ ance, and said : This is hedging ; you know well what is wise. When he insisted, Ibn al-Furat said : If the vizier's choice is fixed upon an individual, let him ask God’s blessing and proceed with the execution of his plan. He understood (said Ibn al-Furat) that I referred to Ibn al-Mu"tazz, about whom rumour was rife. But he said to me : All I want of you is your candid advice. I replied: If that is what the vizier requires, then what I say is : For God's sake do not appoint to the post a man who knows the house of one, the fortune of another, the gardens of a third, the slave-girl of a fourth, the estate of a fifth, and the horse of a sixth ; not one who has mixed with people, has had experience of affairs, has gone through his apprenticeship, and made calculations of people s fortunes. The vizier requested me to repeat those words several times, and said at last : Then whom do you nominate ? I replied : Ja"far son of Mu"ta^id ! 1 What, he said, Ja"far is a child ! True, I said, only he is Mu"tadid’s son. Why should you introduce a man who will govern, and knows our resources, who will administer affairs himself, and regard himself as independent ? Why not deliver the empire to a man who will leave you to administer it ? On the third day "Abbas asked the advice of Abu’l- #asan ‘Ali b. "Isa, and tried hard to make him nominate someone. He declined, saying : I shall nominate no- one ; only let God be feared, and religion be considered. "Abbas b. H asan inclined to Ibn al-Furat’s view, and with this there coincided the testament of Muktafi, which assigned to his brother Ja"far the succession to the Caliphate. So when Muktafi died, late in the day on Saturday 12 Dhu’l-Qa'dah (Aug. 13, 908), the vizier 1 Caliph 279-289 (a.d. 892-902) ; he had restored the might and independence of the Caliphate. VlZIERATE OF ‘ABBAS B. i?ASAN. 3 ‘Abbas appointed Ja‘far to the Caliphate, albeit un¬ willingly, owing to Ja‘far's tender years. Safi the H urami (attendant of the women's apartments) went to bring him down the river from Ibn Tahir's palace 1 2 3 4 ; when the Yvarraqah 2 in which he was brought came on its way to the palace of ‘Abbas b. 77asan, the retainers of ‘Abbas called out to the boatman to come inside. It occurred to Safi the i^urami that ‘Abbas only desired Ja‘far to enter his palace because he had changed his mind with regard to the prince ; fearing then that the vizier might transfer his choice to some one else, Safi told ( 4 ) the boatman not to go in, and drawing his sword said to the boatman : If you go inside, I will slash off your head. So the boatman proceeded without stopping to the Sultan's Palace. Ja‘far’s appointment was then effected, and he took the title al-Muqtadir Billah (“ the powerful through God "). The new Sultan gave ‘Abbas a free hand, and the latter gave out the accession money. 3 The qadi Abul'-JTasan Mohammed b. Salih Hashimi stated that he had been told by the qadi Abu ‘Umar Mohammed b. Yusuf how, after ‘Abbas had carried « through the appointment of Muqtadir, he felt that the prince was too young, and designed dethroning him and appointing Abu ‘Abdallah Mohammed son of Mu‘tamid, 4 a prince who was well-conducted and of fine principles. The vizier employed the qadi Abu ‘Umar as intermediary in the negotiations. The qadi demanded an oath of the prince, but the prince said : If a man's intentions be not honourable, an oath will be of no avail; whereas if they are honourable, it is 1 See Le Strange’s Baghdad, 1900, 119-121. The princes who were not actually of the reigning family were confined here at this time. 2 Some form of rivercraft. 3 The gratuity given to the troops on the occasion of a sovereign’s accession, 4 Caliph 256-279 (a.d. 870-892). 4 A.H. 295. Caliphate of Muqtadir. unnecessary. God is his protector and guarantee that I will not betray him or overthrow him. 'Abbas was waiting before proceeding further for the arrival of Baris the Chamberlain, retainer of Isma'il b. Ahmad, ruler of Khorasan, 1 a despatch from whom had arrived, imagining that he would have all his sup¬ port and that of his retainers against the retainers of Mu'ta^id. His arrival however was long delayed ; and meanwhile a dispute arose between the prince (Abu 'Abdallah Mohammed son of Mu'tamid) and Ibn ‘Amra- waihi, prefect of police in Baghdad. Meeting in the saloon of the vizier, 'Abbas b. Hasan, they interchanged words, and Ibn 'Amrawaihi used offensive expressions to the prince, not knowing to what the latter was aspiring. Owing to the position of his assailant the prince was un¬ able to get satisfaction for the affront; the suppression of his furious indignation caused him to fall down in the vizier's saloon smitten with a paralytic stroke. 'Abbas called for ( 5 ) a litter, in which he ordered him to be conveyed to his home. He very shortly died. 'Abbas then designed to appoint as Caliph a son of Mutawakkil, 2 Abu'l-Husain; but he too died. So Muqtadir was safely installed. Year 296. In this year there was the rebellion of 'Abdallah Ibn al-Mu'tazz. Account of this affair. Mohammed b. Dawud b. al-Jarra/z and Husain b. Hamdan were conspiring to dethrone Muqtadir and install ‘Abdallah son of Mu'tazz in his place. The con¬ spiracy was joined by many commanders,3 clerks 4 and judges. One day when 'Abbas b. Hasan was riding out 1 Samanid prince 279-295 (a.d. 892-907). 2 Caliph 232-247 (a.d. 847-861). 3 A commander had a hundred men under him (Tabari iii. 1799). 4 For this profession see the Introduction, VlZIERATE OF *AbBAS B. #ASAN. 5 to his Gardens known as the Rose Gardens, his path was crossed by #usain b. #amdan, who fell upon the vizier with his sword and killed him. 1 By his side was Fatik, freedman of Mu'tadid, accompanying him ; he shouted at #usain, denouncing his act; ifusain turned upon him and killed him too. There was great confusion, during which i^usain b. #amdan galloped off to the Race¬ course, 2 3 4 5 where he supposed he would find Muqtadir playing polo, meaning to kill him. But when Muqtadir heard the shouting, he hurriedly entered his Palace, and locked the doors against iiZusain. i^usain then went off to the palace in Mukharrim called after Sulaiman b. Wahb,3 and sent to 'Abdallah son of Mu'tazz to inform him of the success of his scheme. 'Abdallah came down from his house on the Sarat and crossed to Mukharrim.4 There were present the com¬ manders and the army, the heads of bureaux, among them 'Ali b. 'Isa and Mohammed b. 'Abdun, the judges and notables, with the exception of Abud-i^asan Ibn al-Furat and the persons attached to Muqtadir. The persons assembled swore allegiance to 'Abdallah, son of Mu'tazz, who was addressed as Caliph, formally invested with the office, 5 and took the title al-Murtadi Billah ("the resigned to God”). A& his vizier he appointed Abu 'Abdallah Mohammed b. Dawud b. ( 6 ) al-Jarrah ; he made 'Ali b. 'Isa president of the bureaux and first estimates, Mohammed b. 'Abdun of the bureaux of con¬ trol. Letters were despatched to all the great cities in the name of 'Abdallah b. al-Mu'tazz, who sent to Muq¬ tadir bidding him retire with his mother to the palace of Ibn Tahir, in order that he, Ibn al-Mu'tazz, might move 1 ‘Arib, p. 26, assigns some personal motives for this act. 2 See Le Strange, p. 292. This ground was still used for polo in 479 (a.d. 1086). 3 Used as the viziers' palace ; see below, p. 258. 4 As appears from the map the Tigris had to be crossed. 5 The formalities are described at length below, p. 290. 6 A.H. 296. Caliphate of Muqtadir. to the Caliph’s Palace himself. Muqtadir replied that he obeyed. The next day Husain b. Hamdan came again to the Caliph’s Palace; where however he met with resistance from the eunuchs, retainers and attendants, and such infantry as were behind the walls ; they prevented his entry, and at the end of the day he carried off such of his property as . he could, with his women and children, and departed by night for Mausil. Of the chief officers none remained with Muqtadir except Mu’nis the Eunuch, Mu’nis the Treasurer, Gharib the Queen-mother’s brother and the court-attendants. 1 When Ibn al-Mu'tazz sent his order to Muqtadir to retire to Ibn Tahir’s palace, these people said to each other : Friends , are we going to surrender in this style ? Why should we not summon up courage to avert what threatens us ? Perhaps God will dispel it. They agreed then to go up the river in shadha’ ahs , 2 taking withthem a company, whom they armed with cuirasses, helmets and weapons, and thus they proceeded to the Mukharrim palace. When they approached it, those who were there on the bank of the Tigris seeing them called out: Here are shadha’ahs coming up stream from the Palace. Terror seized their hearts, and they began to disperse in all directions before there was any engagement and before the shadha’ahs had even arrived at the Mukharrim palace.3 'Abdallah son of Mu'tazz departed, accompanied by his vizier Mohammed b. Dawud and his chamberlain Yumn, who had drawn his sword, and was crying out: People , pray to God for your Caliph ! They took the road into the country, supposing that they would be pursued by the army, and meaning to proceed to Samarra, where they 1 The reference is probably to various freedmen who held confidential posts, and whose names will frequently meet us. 2 See Index “ Rivercraft.” * ‘Arib makes the party pass the palace and shoot the inmates with arrows. Temporary Vizierate of Mohammed b. Dawud. 7 hoped to maintain themselves. No one pursued them ; and when Mohammed b. Dawud saw this, he dismounted when he came in front of his own house, entered it and hid. 'Abdallah son of Mu'tazz dismounted at another spot, walked in the direction of the Tigris, descended to the house of (7) Abu 'Abdallah Ibn al-Jassas, went inside and implored his protection. People fled in all directions, and there was rioting with pillaging, battery, and bloodshed in Baghdad. Mohammed b. 'Amrawaihi, who was prefect of police, mounted his horse, but was attacked by the mob, having been one of the chief abettors of 'Abdallah son of Mu'tazz, and routed. Muqtadir appointed in his place the same day Mu’nis the Treasurer. At the same time when 'Abdallah son of Mu'tazz left his house Abu’l-Hasan 'Ali b. 'Isa and Mohammed b. 'Abdun were among those who took their departure thence. The two went to hide in the dwelling of a greengrocer ; they were noticed by the mob, who sur¬ prised and dragged them out, and delivered them to a servant of Muqtadir, who was passing along the streets. He mounted them both on a baggage mule which was with him, and they were subjected to great annoyance from the mob till they reached the Palace, where they were placed under surveillance. The following persons were arrested the same day : Wasif b. Suratakin, Khurtamish, Yumn, Fatik, 1 with a number of persons who were present in the house of Ibn al Mu'tazz ; among them were the qadi Abu 'Umar Mohammed b. Yusuf, and the qadi Mohammed b. Khalaf b. Waki'. They were all confined in the Palace, and delivered to Munis the Treasurer. Presently he was ordered to put them all to death ; he carried out the order the same night on all except 'Ali b. 'Isa, Mo¬ hammed b. 'Abdun, the qadi Abu 'Umar, and the qadi Mohammed b. Khalaf. These escaped. 1 Clearly a different person from the man murdered by Husain b. Hamdan. 8 A.H. 296. Caliphate of Muqtadir. Muqtadir despatched Mu'nis the Treasurer to the house of AbuT-T^asan 'Ali b. Mohammed b. al-Furat in Suq al-‘Ateish, where he ordinarily resided ; having first given his ring to Mu'nis and informed him that it was the Caliph's intention to make Ibn al-Furat vizier. Ibn al-Furat was in hiding near his house, and did not show himself to Mu'nis. Mu'nis was again sent to him, and cajoled the neighbours, assuring them that Ibn al- Furat was to be appointed vizier ; the latter showed himself at the time of afternoon prayer ( 8 ) on that day. Mu'nis brought him to the Palace, where he was admitted to the presence of Muqtadir, who invested him with the vizierate and the presidency of the bureaux. He returned to his house in Suq al-'Afesh and on the morrow morning (a Monday) visited the Caliph, who bestowed on him the robes of honour appropriate to the vizierate ; the officers in a body proceeded in front of him. On the same day a robe of honour was bestowed on Mu'nis the Treasurer on the occasion of his appointment to the prefecture of police. Ibn al-Furat paid out money for a second pre¬ sent to the army, and the oath of allegiance to Muqtadir was renewed. Account of the capture of * Abdallah son of Mu'tazz. A serving man of Abu 'Abdallah Ibn al-Jassas named Sausan went to Safi the i^urami to give informa¬ tion that 'Abdallah son of Mu'tazz was hiding in his master's house. Muqtadir thereupon sent Safi the #urami with a company ; he raided the residence of Ibn al-Jassas, dragged thence 'Abdallah son of Mu'tazz, and conveyed both him and Ibn al-Jassas to the Palace. Ibn al-Jassas was presently fined a sum of money, which he offered to pay. He was allowed to return to his re¬ sidence after the vizier Ibn al-Furat had guaranteed payment. 'Ali b. 'Isa and Mohammed b. 'Abdun were delivered to Ibn al-Furat; he examined them through messengers VIZIERATE OF IBN AL-FURAT. 9 and inflicted fines upon them ; a light fine on the first, a heavy fine on the second, owing to previous hostility between them. He assured Muqtadir that neither of them had any part in the affair of Ibn al-Mu'tazz. Ibn al-Furat made himself responsible for them and for the qadi Mohammed b. Khalaf b. Waki‘, and obtained their release. He proceeded to banish Mohammed b. 'Abdun to Ahwaz, ordering him to be delivered to Mohammed b. Ja'far 'Abarta'i. He banished 'Ali b. 'Isa to Wasit, after ransoming him with five thousand dinars paid out of his own stock to Sausan the chamberlain, whom he thereby restrained from persecuting him ; for Sausan used to rouse the Caliph's anger against 'Ali b. 'Isa, by declaring that he had been in league with his uncle. 1 It was announced that 'Abdallah son of Mu'tazz had died in the Palace, and the corpse was given to his family, wrapped in horse-cloths. That then was accomplished which God had foreknown and foreordained, that Muq¬ tadir ( 9 ) should be established in the Caliphate. The efforts and schemes of created beings to remove him were unavailing. 2 With regard to Mohammed b. Dawud the following story was told by Abu 'Ali Mohammed b. 'Ali b. Muqlah : We were, he said, one day in the presence of the vizier Ibn al-Furat when he was disengaged. One of his retainers came and whispered into his ear. The vizier seemed deeply grieved ; it turned out that he had been told of Mohammed b. Dawud's execution. He said : He was, though my enemy, a man of intelligence and many virtues \ with his professional attainments 3 he combined proficiency as clerk of the kharaj and of the army, rhetoric, law, literature and poetry ; he was also 1 The vizier Mohammed b. Dawud. 2 The author takes the view which is shared by Tanukhi, and which is in accordance with a prophecy attributed to Mu tadid, that Muqtadir was per¬ sonally responsible for the eclipse of the Caliphate. 3 As vizier. 10 A.H. 296. Caliphate of Muqtadir. generous and free-handed. He has now been put to death in a terrible manner. He proceeded to curse ‘Ali b. #usain Qunna’i the Christian, saying : It was he who led this man astray, for the friendship between the two is well known. He secured his own life and put his friend to death. Account of the proceedings of Qunnai in the matter of Mohammed b. Dawud . Sausan and Safi the i/urami were both enemies of Mohammed b. Dawud. They incited Muqtadir against him, telling him that ‘Ali b. #usain Qunna'i knew his hiding place. Qunna'i was arrested, and threatened with death. He swore that he did not know Mohammed b. Dawud’s hiding place, as his letters came through a woman who brought them to a Christian woman, who brought them to him. He undertook however to hunt him down, and so was released. He proceeded to write to Mohammed b. Dawud, informing him that he was negotiating with Sausan an arrangement which would lead to his rescue ; only the transaction could not be managed by correspondence, whence Mo¬ hammed must give him permission to come to him in his hiding place. If the master of the house would not give leave for this, ( 10 ) then he must come to Qunna'i in a dis¬ guise. Mohammed b. Dawud wrote that he would come to Qunna’i on a night which he named. 'Ali b. iJusain took his letter to Sausan and Safi, and let them read it. They lay in wait on the night appointed and told the prefect of police to give orders to the heads of the dis¬ tricts and captains of police to be on the look out for him. When he came out on that night, he was caught, and delivered to Mu'nis the Treasurer, who put him to death, and flung his body into the road, whence his family took it and buried it. It was stated by Abu ‘Ali Ibn Muqlah and Abu 'Abdallah Zanji the Clerk that Mohammed b. Dawud VIZIERATE OF IbN AL-FURAT. 11 wrote a letter to Ibn al-Furat, which reached him ; he could not send an autograph reply, so he bade the bringer of the missive whom he regarded as trustworthy, greet the sender and say to him : Your offence is no light one ; it is fresh , and hiding is an art. You must put up with having to hide four months , till your story is forgotten , and then leave me to manage for you. By God's grace after that period I shall negotiate for your rescue , and obtain an autograph amnesty for you from the Caliph. I shall say : He entered into the same scheme as the officers and their clerks ; it has been found necessary to pardon them , and his case may be treated in the same way. Then I shall advise the Caliph in your interest. Mohammed b. Dawud how¬ ever would not wait, and what I narrated occurred. Ibn Zanji further narrated how once when he was in the presence of Ibn al-Furat the latter received a missive from the secret service agent to the effect that an “ adviser ” had presented himself, who stated that he had information which he would only communicate to the vizier. Ibn al-Furat bade his chamberlain go out and ask the man about it. He did so : but the man declined to tell him, saying that he wished to tell it to the vizier personally. There were a party of us in the room, and at a signal from the vizier we rose, and left the two by themselves. Presently Ibn al-Furat sum¬ moned his chamberlain 'Abbas of Farghanah, and said to him : Collect the men who are assigned to the service of this house. He then called Abu Bishr Ibn Fara- jawaihi and said to him privately : This person has brought me information about Mohammed b. Dawud, asserting that he is acquainted with his hiding place, and that ( 11 ) he spent yesterday night with him. He wants me to send some one with him to whom he may deliver Mohammed b. Dawud. I have offered to give him a thousand dinars reward if it be true, but to punish him if it prove false. Do you go accordingly and write to 12 A.H. 296. Caliphate of Muqtada. Mohammed b. Dawud at once to move from that place, for I am sending people to raid it and search for him. The vizier kept urging his chamberlain to make haste with gathering the men, the chamberlain replying that he had sent the sergeants in various directions after them, as the men were quartered in different parts of the town, some of them in Qasr Tsa, and some at the Shammasiyyah Gate. And he kept deferring operations till a reply had come to Abu Bishr thanking him and stating that its author had moved to another place. Ibn al-Furat then bade the informer go to the place which he knew with the soldiers, with orders to surround it and its immediate neighbourhood, and after that seize Mo¬ hammed b. Dawud and bring him. If he were not found, then he was to search the houses adjoining the place, taking the precaution of barring the outlets of the streets (so that he might not fail for lack of forethought), and he was also to take a supply of ladders. The chamber- lain 'Abbas, the informer and the soldiers proceeded, and a guard was set on the outlets of the streets and the houses adjoining the place. He entered the house named by the informer, but did not find Mohammed b. Dawud. The informer swore by Almighty God that he had left him in that place, and that it was where he had spent the night. He went about from place to place, but found no trace of him ; then he searched the adjoining house for him, but again failed to find him. The chamberlain returned with the informer to the vizier's presence, and charged the informer with having given false information. The vizier ordered him to be conveyed to the Public Gate and there receive two hundred lashes, after which he was to be paraded on a camel, while a crier proclaimed This is the reward of one who gives false information. The vizier further wrote to Muqtadir giving an account of the affair, and how he had raided numerous houses in the search after Mohammed b. Dawud, but had failed to find him ; and had inflicted punishment upon the VlZIERATE OF IBN AL-FURAT. 13 informer in order that his fellows might not venture to give false information. When the informer returned home, the vizier ordered two hundred dinars to be trans¬ mitted to him, and that he should be conveyed to Basrah. Then he said to us : The man told the truth, and we punished him ; had I not done what I did, I could not be sure but that he would go to the Sultan's ( 12 ) Palace. Abu Bishr was acquainted with the hiding place of Mohammed b. Dawud, and told the vizier ; the vizier however kept the information to himself. This story may well be believed of Ibn al-Furat, a man of generous nature, high moral worth, and noble performance. And in this year Mohammed b. 'Abdun and Sausan the Chamberlain were arrested and executed. Account of the reason for this . The reason for this was that Sausan the Chamberlain had been involved in the plot of Ibn al-Mu'tazz, suppos¬ ing that the latter would confirm him in the office of Chamberlain. When Ibn al-Mu f tazz showed a prefer¬ ence for Yumn, Sausan took alarm and took refuge in the Sultan's Palace. Sausan had a share in the adminis¬ tration with 'Abbas b. iJasan at Muqtadir's court; but when Ibn al-Furat was appointed vizier, he monopolized the administration to the exclusion of Sausan ; whence the relations between the two became strained. A rumour was circulated that Sausan had fully determined to make an assault on the person of Ibn al-Furat, having conspired thereto with a number of H ujari retainers 1 ; and he plotted to make Mohammed b. 'Abdun vizier, nominating him to Muqtadir for the post, and offering a large sum of money if the appointment were made. He despatched Bunayy b. Nafis to Ahwaz to fetch Mo¬ hammed b. 'Abdun without informing Ibn al-Furat, Bunayy alleging that he had been sent merely to collect 1 A class of retainers originally purchased by Mu'tadid and instructed to remain within the Palace. Hilal, p. 12, 14 A.H. 296. Caliphate of Muqtadir. some money which had been deposited by 'Abbas b. Hasan in Basrah. Before Mohammed b. 'Abdun had reached Wasit, Ibn al-Furat got wind of the plot, and persuaded Muqtadir that it was Sausan's intention to assassinate him (the vizier) first, and then Muqtadir himself ; that he had been one of the chief supporters of Ibn al-Mu'tazz and only deserted him ultimately when he learned that Ibn al-Mu'tazz had appointed some one else chamberlain. He obtained Muqtadir’s permission to arrest Sausan, and had him arrested and executed the same day. The officer appointed to carry out this order was Takin the Favourite, 1 who was in training for the chamberlainship, and actually admin¬ istering it. ( 13 ) The vizier then sent an officer to waylay Moham¬ med b. ‘Abdun, and had him imprisoned in the Palace; after imposing on him a fresh fine, he handed him over to Mu'nis the Treasurer, who had him executed. This alarmed Abu’l-Hasan 'Alib. Tsa, who was in Wasit; writing to the vizier he assured him that his enmity towards Mohammed b. 'Abdun was unabated, but that truth compelled him to attest that Mohammed b. ‘Abdun was not the man to risk his life by undertaking the office of vizier, being only too glad to be safe after the sedition of Ibn al-Mu'tazz. Sausan had therefore organized this affair without consulting him or obtaining his consent. For himself he begged that he might be removed to Meccah in order to be secure against suspicion and that his name might be forgotten by the Sultan. To this Ibn al-Furat assented ; 'Ali b. Tsa was transferred by his order from Wasit to Meccah in honourable style, making his way thither via Basrah. 'Ali b. Tsa wrote this letter hoping that thereby Mohammed b. 'Abdun might escape execution, and the writer himself also be 1 I.e. member of a special class of freedmen instituted by Muwaffaq. Hilal, p. 12, VlZIERATE OF IBN AL-FURAT. 15 saved. God requited him personally for the excellence of his intentions, but the appointed term of Mohammed b. 'Abdun having come, he was not helped by the en¬ deavours of ‘Ali b. ‘Isa. When Muqtadir had become firmly seated as Caliph, he handed the government over to Abu'l-i^asan Ibn al- Furat, who proceeded to administer it in the style of a Caliph. Muqtadir devoted all his time to his amuse¬ ments, avoided male companions—even minstrels—and consorted with women, so that women and slaves became supreme in the empire. Abu’l-i/asan ceaselessly ex¬ pended the money in the private Treasury and squandered it until he exhausted the whole. It is to the credit of Ibn al-Furat that he commenced his gov¬ ernment by obtaining an order from Muqtadir to send a circular note to all the provincial governors, bidding them deal justly with the populations, and abolish illegal imposts ; and ordered that a pension be paid to each member of the Hashim family, and presently that it should be increased. Further he produced an order that all members of the family who had rebelled and joined the party of Ibn al-Mu'tazz should be pardoned, and treated with the same liberality as those who had committed no offence. ( 14 ) Finally he interceded for Husain b. Uamdan and Ibrahim b. Kaighalagh, till Muqtadir was willing to invest them with offices. For this he used the good offices of Ibn 'Amrawaihi. His wise conduct of this affair. He pointed out to Muqtadir that, if he were to punish all who had joined the conspiracy of Ibn al-Mu'tazz, the result would be disloyalty, and the increase of rebels and persons in fear of their lives, who would endeavour to compass their own safety by endangering that of the kingdom. He advised the burning of the rolls containing the names of Ibn al-Mu'tazz's followers. Muqtadir agreed ; Ibn al-Furat gave orders that the rolls should 16 A.H. 296. Caliphate of Muqtadir. be sunk in the Tigris, and when this was done, the result was tranquillity and gratitude. Affair of the Qadi Abu 'Umar. The qadi Yusuf b. Ya'qub was an aged man, attached to Ibn al-Furat; and constantly in his presence he begged with tears for the deliverance of his son Abu 'Umar from execution. Ibn al-Furat told him that he could only compass this by holding out hopes to Muq¬ tadir of a vast sum to be paid to him. The old man offered to beggar both himself and his son to obtain the latter's life. Ibn al-Furat requested his pardon, offering the wealth of the two in exchange. The Caliph put Abu 'Umar in the power of the vizier, who demanded a fine of 100,000 dinars, imprisoning him in the office of the Treasury till he should pay the money ; he paid the greater part. Part of the payment was a sum of 45,000 dinars said to have been deposited with him by 'Abbas b. Hasan. When he had paid 90,000 Ibn al- Furat permitted him to return to his residence, excusing him the remaining 10,000. He was ordered however to stay at home and never go outside. (15) A case of treachery involving an unpleasant coincidence. Sulaiman b. Hasan b. Makhlad was an intimate associate of Ibn al-Furat, on whom he had a hold by virtue of certain affairs which had passed between his father and the vizier’s father, Abu Ja'far Mohammed b. Musa b. al-Furat. The vizier found certain docu¬ ments in his handwriting bearing on the conspiracy in favour of Ibn al-Mu'tazz, due to his former association with Mohammed b. Dawud b. Al-Jarrah, and their kinship. Ibn al-Furat did not reveal these documents or mention them to Muqtadir; and nominated this Sulaiman for the presidency of the public audience-chamber. Pre¬ sently Sulaiman injured his own cause by backing Abu’l- Hasan Ahmad b. Mohammed b. 'Abd al-Hamid for the vizierate; addressing a personal letter f° Muqtadir, VlZIERATE OF IBN AL-FuRAT. 17 wherein he attacked Ibn al-Furat, his accumulation of wealth, his estates, his secretarial staff, and his friends. This letter was in his sleeve 1 when he paid a visit to Ibn al-Furat. Standing up to perform the evening prayer with a number of clerks he let the note drop out of his sleeve, when it was picked up by Al-Saqr b. Mohammed the clerk, who was praying at his side. He hastened to bring it to Ibn al-Furat, who had the man arrested and taken down stream in a covered boat to Wasit. There he was put into custody and fined ; presently Ibn al- Furat, acting in accordance with his usual disposition, admitted him to favour and bestowed on him an office. In this year Abu'l-Haija 'Abdallah b. Hamdan was invited by letter to attack and fight against his brother Husain, being reinforced with four thousand men under Qasim b. Sima. The forces joined and met Husain, who defeated them ; Ibrahim b. Hamdan then came down to intercede in the interest of his brother Husain ; he succeeded ; a pardon was drawn up for Husain, who came to the capital, and took up his quarters in the fields on the Western bank, not entering the Palace. He was put in charge of the war in Qumm, invested with a robe of honour, and proceeded to Qumm, whence 'Abbas b. 'Amr was withdrawn. ( 16 ) In the same year there arrived in Baghdad Baris, retainer of Isma'il b. A#mad, governor of Khorasan, accompanied by 4,000 Turkish slaves and others seeking refuge ; his master followed him as far as Rayy, dis¬ playing resentment at his retainer being harboured by the Sultan. Ibn al-Furat sent a letter which appeased him ; he returned to Khorasan ; the vizier put Baris in charge of Diyar Rabi'ah and despatched him thither. The vizier also made Yusuf Ibn Abi'l-Saj governor of Armenia and Adharbaijan, giving him the revenues, 1 For the use of the sleeve as a pocket see Wilson, l.c., p. 139, 18 A.H. 297. Caliphate of Muqtadir. for 120,000 dinars to be paid yearly into the public treasury of the metropolis. Yusuf proceeded from Dinawar to his province. 1 In this year Tahir and Ya'qub sons of Mohammed b. 'Amr b. Laith were brought as prisoners to Baghdad in a litter on a mule, with coverings removed, followed by Abu’l-Fadl 'Abd al-Ra^man b. Ja'far Shirazi, secre¬ tary of Subkara governor of Fars. He was brought into the presence of Muqtadir and they with him after their fetters had been removed ; a robe of honour was be¬ stowed on ‘Abd al-Ra/unan b. Ja'far, who was assigned rank in the first group ; riding in his robe he was lodged in a house in the Square of al-Khurasi. Tahir and Ya'qub were imprisoned in the Palace. Subkara had got control over Fars, and when his secretary 'Abd al-RaAman arrived in Baghdad, he arranged that his master should continue in his govern¬ ment on condition of his sending a fixed tribute for Fars. He then returned to his master. Presently news came that Laith b. 'Ali had left Sijistan, and invaded Fars, ( 17 ) which was evacuated by Subkara. The vizier called upon Mu’nis the Eunuch to march to Fars, and bestowed on him a robe of honour. On his march he united forces with Subkara at Ramhurmuz, and the two proceeded together. Laith marched to Arrajan to meet Mu'nis. A hasty move and a disagreeable coincidence . Laith, hearing that #usain b. tfamdan had marched from Qumm to Bai^a, was afraid Shiraz might be wrested from him ; he therefore sent his brother with a detach¬ ment of his army to guard Shiraz. He himself took a guide who indicated a short cut close to Bai^a, hoping to attack tfusain b. tfamdan. The guide took him by a i For the administration of Yusuf Ibn Abi 1-Saj in Armenia, see the Armenian Chronicle by Stephanos of Taron, translated by Gelzer and Burckhardt, pp. 119- 123. Also Gfrorer, Byzantinische Geschichten iii. 356, 19 VlZIERATE OF IBN AL-FuRAT. footpath, which was narrow and difficult, unfit for the passage of an army, wherein he encountered great hard¬ ship so much so that both beasts and men perished. He executed the guide and left the path, coming out at Khuwabdan, whither Mu’nis had already arrived. Seeing the army of Mu’nis, Laith imagined it to be that of his brother whom he had despatched to Shiraz, and advanced towards it, when he . was assailed and taken prisoner. When he had come into the power of Mu’nis, the officers of the latter advised him to arrest Subkara, which however Mu’nis declined to do ; still, when they insisted, he feigned assent, undertaking to arrest him when he visited him on the morrow. For it was the custom of Subkara to ride out from his camp to Mu'nis every day to salute. Mu’nis sent him a private message informing him of the officers’ advice, and suggesting to him to hasten away to Shiraz ; which Subkara pro¬ ceeded to do. When it was morning and the day pro¬ ceeded, Mu’nis pointed out to his followers that Subkara had not come ; so they sent to enquire about him ; the messenger when he returned informed them that Subkara had gone off to Shiraz last evening ; Mu’nis thereupon began to rate his officers, declaring that Subkara must have been informed by some of them, and taken alarm. Mu’nis then, taking Laith with him, started back to Baghdad, while Husain went off to Qumm. A wicked plot and its result . ( 18 ) When Subkara reached Shiraz, he had with him an officer named Qattal, who set him against his secre¬ tary ‘Abd al-Ra^man b. Ja'far, informing Subkara that this person was on the side of the Sultan, and had even taken an oath of allegiance from all his officers to the Sultan ; whence at any time he might produce a letter from the Sultan, ordering his arrest. Subkara, alarmed at this, arrested ‘Abd aJ-Ra/unan b. Ja'far, and appointed to the office of secretary in his stead one 20 A.H. 298. Caliphate of Muqtadir. Isma'il b. Ibrahim Taimi, who urged him to rebel, observing that the Sultan’s army having depafted, and being unable to return quickly, he had best retain the money which he had been in the habit of sending to the Sultan, set his own affairs in order, conciliate his army, and then see. ‘Abd al-Ra/mian b. Ja'far from his prison managed to write a letter to Ibn al-Furat informing him of the state of affairs, what had happened to himself, and Subkara's rebellion. Ibn al-Furat thereupon wrote to Mu’nis, who had reached Wasit, a letter wherein he said : If you have opened , you have nevertheless closed) and if you have bound, you have nevertheless loosed ) you had best return and fight Subkara. Mu’nis thereupon re¬ turned to Ahwaz, and Subkara began to cajole him, requesting him to offer the Sultan on his part for the government of Fars and Kirman more than Qasim b. ' Ubaidallah had paid for the same fiefs in the time of Muktafi, that sum having been four million. 1 Mu’nis assented and offered seven million. Ibn al-Furat de¬ clined this offer ; Mu’nis raised the bid gradually to nine million without deduction for delivery, stating that Subkara required the rest of the money raised for the pay. of the army in Fars and Kirman ; and pointing out that there were many expenses there. Ibn al-Furat would be satisfied with nothing less than thirteen millions ; Mu'nis advised Subkara to meet the wishes of the Sultan and the vizier, but ( 19 ) Subkara declined to raise his bid above ten millions. The vizier was annoyed by his obstinacy, and suspected Mu’nis of favouring Subkara unduly. Year 298. Account of Subkara*s captivity. He then adopted the plan of sending Wasif Kamah with a number of officers from Baghdad, and with them Mohammed b. Ja'far ‘AbartaT, on whom he relied for 1 i.e. Dirhems, VlZIERATE OF IbN AL-FtJRAT. 21 the re-conquest of Fars. He wrote to Mu’nis informing him that he placed confidence in no one but him for the safe custody of Laith, and that it was his best plan to bring him to Baghdad, leaving the greater number of his officers with Mohammed b. Ja'far in the neighbourhood of the districts of Fars, lest they should all be drawn to Baghdad before affairs were settled with Subkara with regard to the tribute, and Subkara endeavour to get at the Sultan. So Mu’nis departed from Ahwaz, whereupon the vizier wrote to Mohammed b. Ja'far 'Abarta’i, and to the officers, bidding them hasten to Shiraz with a number of the officers in Ahwaz; with him was associated Wasif Kamah, and there were sent to aid besides Sima Khazari, Fatik Mu'tadidi 1 and Yumn Tuluni. When Mohammed b. Ja'far’s army was complete, he marched against Subkara, and gave him battle at the gate of Shiraz, when Subkara was defeated and fled to Bamm, where he entrenched himself ; followed thither by his adversary, who again defeated him, he retreated to the desert of Khorasan, while Qattal was taken prisoner. When the news of the victory reached Baghdad, the Sultan' bestowed a robe of honour on the vizier; Mohammed b. Ja'far appointed Futaih slave of Afshin to the ministry of war and public security in Fars and Kirman, being partial to Futai h on account of his good looks. This year too there came a despatch from Ahmad b. Isma'il, governor of Khorasan, announcing the conquest of Sijistan, and the capture of Mohammed b. ‘Ali b. Laith ; this was followed by a despatch an¬ nouncing that he had captured Subkara ; and orders were sent to AAmad b. Isma'il to bring them both to the capital. ( 20 ) In Shawwal of this year (June, 910 A.D.) the two were brought to the city exposed on a 1 According to p. 5 he was killed in 296. 22 A.H. 299. Caliphate of Muqtadir. couple of elephants ; robes of honour were bestowed on the vizier Ibn al-Furat, then on Marzubani, the deputy of the governor of Khorasan, while the messengers who had brought the two prisoners were sent back with robes, scent and jewels for the governor of Khorasan. In the same year came the news of the death of ‘Abarta'i, and presently of Futai# ; ‘Abdallah b. Ibrahim al-Misma‘i was then made minister of public security in Fars. In it too Fatimah the Stewardess was drowned in her boat under the Bridge on a windy day ; she had married her two daughters to Bunayy b. Nafis and Qaisar, and these persons attended the funeral, which was also attended by various officers and judges. The Queen-mother appointed Umm Musa the Hashimite Stewardess in her place, and the latter acted as inter¬ mediary between the Queen-mother with Muqtadir, and Ibn al-Furat. Year 299. In this year Ibn al-Furat was arrested and his palace placed under surveillance, where the privacy of the women's apartments was disgracefully violated; his dwelling and those of his clerks and dependents were plundered, while civil war raged in Baghdad, and houses were pillaged. Now Mu'nis the Treasurer commanded the police of Baghdad, having under his orders in virtue of his office 9,000 mounted men ; when the civil war grew fierce and the pillaging increased, he would ride about, and out of respect for him the people would grow calm and stop plundering : but when he had dismounted things would resume their former course. For three days and nights the disorder was very serious, then it was allayed. The duration of this first vizierate of Ibn al-Furat was three years, eight months and thirteen days ; the appointment was now given to Abu 'Ali Mohammed b. 23 VlZIERATE OF ABU ‘AlI KhAQANI. *Ubaidallah b. Yahya b. ( 21 ) Khaqan, in Dhu’l-ffijjah 299. 1 He appointed the heads of departments, and gave them their respective rank in their offices. He put the examination of Ibn al-Furat and his dependents and clerks in the hands of Abu’l-#asan Ahmad b. Yahya b. Abi'l-Baghl. He also entrusted him with the bureau of the fined, that of the ‘Abbasi estates, and that of the control of the estates of Ibn al-Furat. Of the associates of Ibn al-Furat there went into hiding Abu ‘Ali Mohammed b. ‘Ali b. Muqlah, Abu'l-Tayyib Kalwadhi, Abu’l-Qasim Hisham, and Abu Bishr b. Farajawaihi ; the remainder were arrested, their houses plundered and demolished, and themselves im¬ prisoned. Their inquisitor was Ibn Abi’l-Baghl, who tortured them; he also was inquisitor in the case of Ibn al-Furat, only was not allowed to do him any personal injury, though permitted to maltreat all his dependents and clerks. Account of the schemes of Ibn Abil-Baghl and their turning against him . Abu’l-#usain Ibn Abil-Baghl had been banished in the days of Ibn al-Furat to Ispahan ; and when the civil war arose in Baghdad, and his brother 2 was appointed to examine Ibn al-Furat and his dependents, that brother intrigued to obtain the vizierate for him so soon as he was able to interview Umm Musa, 3 offering a large sum which he was prepared to raise and increase. With this he sought to work on the covetousness of Muqtadir. He then circulated a rumour that the appointment had been made, and wrote to his brother bidding him hasten to Baghdad, the missive being conveyed by Abu Bakr brother of Umm Musa. On his way he was addressed as Vizier, and was met by the officers and others on his arrival at the metropolis. 1 Began July 19, 912. 2 More correctly his cousin. 3 The recently appointed Stewardess of the Palace. 24 A.H. 299. Caliphate of Muqtadib. On a certain evening Abu 'Ali Khaqani rode to the Palace, and requested an audience of Muqtadir, which was granted ; he pointed out to the Caliph that affairs were in disorder, the tribute delayed, and the world rendered desolate by the number of rumours on this subject, Ibn Abi’l-Baghl stating that he had been sum¬ moned to assume the vizierate. Muqtadir returned a soft answer, and gave him permission to remove Ibn Abi'l-Baghl and his brother from the metropolis ; he accordingly arrested and banished them. ( 22 ) Umm Musa the Stewardess withdrew her favour in consequence from the vizier Abu 'Ali Khaqani; and he in alarm at this, and fearing she might ruin him, con¬ ciliated her by investing Abu'l-#usain of the pair with the control of the kharaj and the Estates in Ispahan, and his brother Abu'l-Hasan with the government of SilA and Mabarik. The vizier further wrote ordering the release of Abu’l- Haitham 'Abbas b. Thawabah who had been imprisoned in Mausil, whither he had been transferred by Ibn al- Furat during the reverse of Mohammed b. 'Abdun owing to their relationship. 1 This Ibn Thawabah used to act as secretary for Mohammed b. Devadadh , 2 and had a bad character. Coming to Baghdad in the year 300 he was appointed by the vizier Abu 'Ali Khakani to the bureau of fines and of the 'Abbasi and Furati estates, and into his hands was put the inquisition on Ibn al- Furat, his dependents and clerks. He maltreated them excessively and tortured them in all sorts of ways, and repeatedly examined Ibn al-Furat; insulting and re¬ viling Ibn al-Furat on some of these occasions, in the presence of Umm Musa,3 when he was repaid by Ibn al-Furat with the like, who ascribed to him every evil 1 See above, p. 12. 2 Brother of Ibn Abi’l-Saj, called Afshin. 8 See below, p. 88. Vizierate of Abu 'Ali Khaqani. 25 quality. Ibn Thawabah wrote to Muqtadir, asserting that Ibn al-Furat had only ventured to do this owing to his extreme pride and his vast wealth, and asked leave to torture him. Muqtadir accordingly let Ibn Thawabah do what he liked with him ; so he put him in chains and fetters, clothed him in a woollen jubbah, and exposed him in the sun for a period of four hours till he all but perished. An account of this was brought by Badr the H urami to Muqtadir, who expressed disapproval of Ibn ThawabalTs action, and ordered Ibn al-Furat to be removed to one of the private apartments under the control of Zaxdan the Stewardess, where he was well treated and comforted, but only after Ibn al-Furat had sworn a solemn oath that there remained no treasure, property, or goods of value to which he had not confessed when questioned by Ibn Abi’l-Baghl. ( 23 ) This oath was accepted by Muqtadir, who for¬ bade Ibn Thawabah to examine him further. After this Muqtadir began to consult Ibn al-Furat about affairs of state, showing him the letters of the viziers to himself and answering them in accordance with his advice. Then charges against Abu 'Ali Khaqani became frequent, and Abu’l-Qasim Ibn al-Hawari became powerful. 1 Account of the mismanagement of the vizierate by Abu ‘Ali Khaqani . This vizier found his time fully occupied with paying court to the Sultan and looking after his own enemies, so that he had not time to read the letters that came or were despatched ; he relied on his son Abu’l-Qasim 'Abdallah, to whom he gave besides the charge of show¬ ing despatches to the Caliph, with that of acting as his deputy in general administration. This son was given to drinking, and attended exclu¬ sively to the affairs of the officers and troops, and the 1 In Hilal’s work he is represented as an ally of Umm Musa. 26 A.H. 299. Caliphate of Muqtadir. appointments to governorships, neglecting all else. He had given the duty of reading incoming letters to Abu Nasr Malik b. al-Walid, and that of reading outgoing documents to Abu ‘Isa Yahya b. Ibrahim Maliki. Abu ‘Ali and his son had summaries made of what came in and went out, but neither of them read them until the affairs with which they dealt were past; the memo¬ randa of remittances and cheques remained unopened in their storehouse, their contents being unknown. Thus under the administration of Abu ‘Ali Khaqani affairs went to wrack and ruin. In one week he would appoint a number of governors to the same district, as many as seven, it is said, to Mah al-Kufah in the course of twenty days; these all met in a Khan in Hulwan. For the administration of Qurdi and Bazibdha he appointed five governors who met in a Khan at ‘Ukbara on one day. The reason for this was the profits obtained by his sons and clerks from the governors whom they appointed. All sorts of stories were written and remembered about him. He also was very free in issuing orders, increases, gratuities and ratifications, both directly and through his sons, and Bunan, Ya/zya b. Ibrahim ( 24 ) Maliki, and AAmad and Mohammed sons of Sa'id. Khaqani endeavoured to endear himself to the hearts of the nobles and the commons by forbidding the servants of the Sultan and the chief officers of the army to head their letters with servile expressions, while he conciliated the common people by praying with them in the mosques which are in the streets. If he saw a company of sailors or others of humble rank praying in a mosque on the river-bank, he would order a boat, embark and join the worship. By his conduct the office of vizier became degraded and humiliated. When any one asked him a favour he would beat his breast, and say “ with all my heart.” Hence he was called “ He beat his breast.” Money began to run short, Vizierate of Abu ‘Ali Khaqani. 27 and he was unable to pay in full the stipendiaries and chief officers, &c. In consequence they rioted, made for the Oratory, 1 and abode there, taking with them most of the officers. The affair became serious, and they assailed him with violent language. He was ordered by Muqtadir to pay them their stipends, but excused him¬ self on the ground of the deficiency of supplies, and the reduction of the revenue ; observing further that the moneys extracted from Ibn al-Furat and his dependents had gone into the private Treasury, out of which the Treasurer declined to make any payment. Muqtadir accordingly ordered that half a million dinars should be paid out of that Treasury to be expended in satisfying the demands of the rioters. ShafF Lu’lu’i was then appointed postmaster of Baghdad, and overseer of the vizier, the army, the officials, judges and police. When Ibn Thawabah saw the weakness of the vizier he endeavoured to conciliate Muqtadir by letters, delivered by Umm Musa, wherein he asserted his ability to extract vast sums from the officials which had been overlooked by Khaqani; e.g., 700,000 dinars from Mohammed b. ‘Ali Madara’i and his brother Ibrahim alone. Khaqani was ordered to give full powers to Ibn Thawabah, who, receiving them, (25) began to extort moneys with violence, and got control of affairs, dis¬ charging the officers appointed by the vizier, and appoint¬ ing whom he thought fit. Various knaves managed to write letters and convey them through Umm Musa to Muqtadir, requesting posts, and promising money; Khaqani was ordered to appoint them. His adminis¬ tration was thus weakened, and these knaves became associated with him in his duties, and extorted money by all means and every form of violence. Now Hamid b. ‘Abbas had been farming the revenue of Wasit and the district for four years ; the clerks had *See Note on p. 56. 28 A.H. 300. Caliphate of Muqtadir. drawn up his account, making him owe 240,000 dinars for each year, and besides 24,000 kurr of barley, of normal size, for the horses of the troops, to be exacted from him in addition to the cash specified. In reality Hamid had contracted according to the register of the preceding year with a slight addition. The deficit, waste and confusion were due to Khaqani, who during the days of ‘Ub aidallah b. Sulaiman 1 and down to the time of his concealing himself during the first vizierate of Ibn al-Furat had been in charge of the post, the appeals and the portfolios in Masabadhan. When he was invested with the vizierate, he was bewildered owing to want of experience. Mu’nis bethought him of appointing ‘Ali b. Tsa instead. Year 300. When Muqtadir perceived the disorder, mismanage¬ ment and anarchy, he consulted Munis the Eunuch, informing him that the state of affairs suggested the restoration of Ibn al-Furat to the vizierate ; Mu’nis was however offended with Ibn al-Furat owing to certain matters, some of which we have recorded in the account of the episode with Subkara, when he arranged the affairs of Fars, and that arrangement was cancelled by Ibn al-Furat. He told Muqtadir that it would cause a scandal if the provincial governors were to learn that the Sultan had dismissed a vizier and then been com¬ pelled to restore him to office after a few months of dis¬ missal , ( 26 ) and that the Sultan’s action would be attributed simply to the desire to seize the vizier’s goods. He went on to say that the cosmic secretaries who had managed the empire and been at the head of the bureaux since the days of MuTadid were the two sons of Furat, of whom Abu’1-'Abbas was now dead, whereas the other had held the vizierate until dismissal; further Mohammed b. Dawud and Mohammed b.^Abdun, both of whom had been killed in the sedition of Ibn al-Mu4azz. Besides 1 Vizier of Mu'tadid 278. VlZIERATE OF 'ALI B. ’ISA. 29 these there was 'Ali b. 'Isa, and with the exception of him there was no-one left capable of administering the empire. Mu’nis described him as trustworthy, faithful, pious, single-minded, safe and competent; so he was ordered by Muqtadir to despatch Y albaq 1 to him to summon him to the metropolis. To Khaqani he alleged that he was summoning him to act as deputy for Khaqani’s son 'Abdallah in the bureaux. And indeed Khaqani used to say in his audience-chamber that he had written to have 'Ali b. 'Isa brought to the metro¬ polis in order that he might be the deputy of 'Abdallah. On Monday 10 MuAarram, 302, 2 when Khaqani rode to the palace of the Sultan, he, his sons 'Abdallah and 'Abd al-WaMd, Abu’l-Haitham Ibn Thawabah, YaAya b. Ibrahim Maliki, A/unad and Mohammed sons of Sa'id the chamberlains, Bunan and Sa'id b. 'Uthman al- Naffat were arrested, and given in custody to Nadhir #urami ; Sa'id b. 'Uthman was one of those who had helped to procure the vizierate for Khaqani, and been rewarded by him with an important office. In this year 'Abdallah b. Ibrahim al-Misma'i was dismissed from the ministry of public security in Fars, and the office was given to Badr #ammami, who had held the same office in Ispahan. After his transference to this office in Fars and Kirman, his former charge was given to ‘Ali b. Wahsudhan the Dailemite. Year 301. In this year Abu’l-#asan 'Ali b. 'Isa assumed the office of vizier at the time of his arrival from Meccah. Robes of honour were bestowed on him (27) and he rode from the Palace to his own house, accompanied by Mu nis the Eunuch, Gharib the Queen-mother’s brother and the other captains and retainers, also mounted. The day of his decoration he was given possession of the persons of Mohammed b. 'Ubaidallah Khaqani, his two sons 1 Freedman of Mu'nis, who plays an important part later. 2 Aug. 5, 914, 30 A.H. 301. Caliphate of Muqtadir. and the rest of the persons whom I have named^above. He imposed upon them fines of moderate amount, which he exacted in full; he then permitted Khaqani to return to his home, where he was to remain under custody, but great care was taken to guard his family from insult. He had Abu’l-Haitham Ibn Thawabah tortured. He then commenced an investigation of the state of the departments, carrying this out in the vizier’s palace in Mukharrim ; thither he betook himself every morning and there he worked till the latest time when the last evening prayer may be said, and then he returned home. He sent the usual notification to every provincial governor of the robes bestowed on him by the Caliph, and his being entrusted with the management of the bureaux and of the empire. While confirming them in their several appointments he bade them use their best efforts to secure the prosperity of their provinces, and ended as follows : This is the commencement of the year, the beginning of a new season, and the time when the land-tax is capable of being made to thrive. I know of nothing which I need demand of you or remind you of; I will only bid you send a considerable portion of the money, and despatch advice thereof together with the answer to this letter so soon as you have seen it. You shall then write to me describing the state of your pro¬ vince with a report such as we can understand and will show us how you have conducted yourself therein and the nature of your methods for rendering the resources of your province copious and fruitful; and you may delay the apportioning of revenues and the ]ike to special purposes until letters and orders come from me for the purpose of sounding your judgment concerning the prin¬ ciples to be observed in your action. Make up your mind that I will have no laxity nor tampering with any of the rights of the Commander of the Faithful, nor wil] leave a single dirhem of his money unaccounted ; nor VIZIERATE OF ‘AlI B. ‘ISA. 31 will I put up with any negligence of the interests of the government whether the culprit be my kin or a stranger ; and you should not be more anxious to earn merit in such matters than to deal justly and equitably with your sub¬ jects and to remove from them unfair burdens small or great. For I shall hold you answerable for these things as I hold you answerable for the honest administration of the Sultar’s revenues and the ( 28 ) proper guarding of his property. And do you write to me without fail from time to time about your dealings, that I may know them, if God will. After this he installed various persons in the bureaux and dismissed others, and did the like with the provincial governors. He then tried to find out who were in the habit of appropriating the revenues of the Sultan, and living in grand style therewith, or neglecting the improve¬ ment of the provinces and devoting their energies else¬ where ; dismissing such officials, he put the frontiers into a state of defence, and repaired the hospitals, saw that the overseers of these institutions were properly paid, provided for the wants of the patients and their attendants, and repaired the public mosques. Orders on these subjects were issued by him to the governors in all the provinces, and he further issued an order about appeals, as follows :—In the name of God, &c. When any appeal is lodged with you before New Year’s Day, the appellant asserting that portions of his fruits have been ruined by some disaster, in enquiring into the truth thereof you must rely on the most trustworthy and competent of your helpers, in order that you may ascer¬ tain the truth. Then when the injustice is made mani¬ fest, you shall remove it and substitute justice for it; you shall reduce the assessment in accordance with the results of the investigation ; you shall then proceed to exact the land-tax without favour to the strong or in¬ justice to the weak. And in all that has been committed 32 A.H. 301. Caliphate of Muqtadir. to you court publicity, and compass complete justice, towards the subjects and general equity—if God will. He further issued an order abolishing the supplement ary tax in Fars, and a series of similar documents, which won fame and eulogy, on a variety of similar matters. In short Abu'l-i^asan ‘Ali b. 'Isa administered the world admirably, giving his deputies excellent instructions, seeing that justice was done to the subjects, abolishing unfair usages, and displaying thorough competence in his management of the vizierate, the bureaux and the general business of the empire. He was honest, self- denying and pious. He devoted attention to appeals, abolished the duty in Meccah, the supplement in Fars, and the “ Sea-market ” in Ahwaz, 1 as well ( 29 ) as the wine-tax in Diyar Rabi'ah. Thus he proved a blessing to the world. He put the country into a prosperous condition, and thereby obtained increased revenues. He won the favour of the Sultan, whose dignity was restored, while the subjects prospered. 'Ali b. Tsa proceeded to abolish the increases made by Khaqani during his vizierate in the bureaux of the army and their fiefs ; now this increase had been extended to all ranks in the army from generals downwards, . to servants and attendants and further to all clerks and employes. It amounted therefore to a vast sum ; when it was withdrawn the vizier incurred general hostility, and was charged with parsimony, miserliness, and starv¬ ing the army. He was however forced to adopt this course because he found the Sultan's expenses greatly in excess of his revenue, necessitating the demolition of treasuries and expending their contents on useless objects. Thabit b. Sinan records the following statement made by ‘Ali b. Tsa : I had made, he said, a statement of the revenue of the empire and the expense which I had to Yacjut (in his geographies! dictionary) knows nothing more about this than what this passage implies. The supplement in Fars was a tax on trees. 33 VIZIERATE OF ‘ALI B. 'ISA. meet, and found the expenditure considerably larger than the revenue. Ibn al-Furat said to me one day after he had superseded me, when I had been brought out of prison in the Palace to be examined by him : You have abolished the customs and so put an end to the revenue. —What customs, I asked, have I abolished ?—He replied : The duty in Meccah and the Supplement in Fars. —I said : Are those the only duties which I have abolished ? On the contrary I have abolished a number, which I proceeded to enumerate, amounting to half a million dinars annually. But, I said, I do not consider this a large sum if compared with the burdens whereof I have eased the Commander of the Faithful, and the stains and blots which I have removed from his rule. At the same time as you consider my reductions and abolitions, consider also the sums which we respectively have raised and the sums which we each have spent.-— Thabit said he asked 'Ali b. Tsa what answer Tbn al-Furat gave him.—An attendant, he replied, came out and separated us before he could answer. I was informed, he adds, by A#mad b. Mohammed b. Sam'un, who was inspector of the province Nahra- wanat ( 30 ) as follows: We had, he said, been assessing the produce of the farmers, when one of them without our knowledge came to the door of the vizier 'Ali b. Tsa to complain that we had overestimated one of his fields. All of a sudden we received a visit from an officer named Ibn al-Badhdhal, with a troop of surveyors from Badu- riyya and an escort of cavalry and infantry. We felt sure that he had come to cashier us. My colleague asked me to meet him and find out the news. I did so and learned about the complainant. My colleague then asked me whether I knew how the complainant’s land had been assessed, and when I answered in the negative, he told me to go and make an exact measurement. I accordingly took with me the local surveyors and by using 34 A.H. 301. Caliphate of Muqtadir. the utmost diligence obtained the exact measurement; in the previous survey we had made it 22 jaribs, but this time it came to 21 jaribs and one qafiz. I argued in excuse that the previous measurement had been made when the corn was standing, whereas this time it was measured after reaping, and there was nothing surprising about this amount of difference being found between the two measurements in these two different states. Ibn al-Badhdhal went away ; and presently there arrived a terribly menacing letter from 'Ali b. 'Isa, threatening terrible things if he found that any one of the subjects had been unfairly treated in the survey or any other transaction. In consequence, he said, we did not venture to make our demands very strict; and when the next year came, the revenue had gone up 30 per cent., the rumour having spread that justice was being practised, and that robbery and extortion were at an end. Hence people were encouraged to go in more for agriculture. He acted similarly with appeals. Ibn al-Musharrif records how one of the administrators of Baduriyya made a demand for land-tax with arrears, and imprisoned the persons concerned ; they put up with imprisonment, so he put them in irons ; they endured those too, but he did not venture to torture them, for fear of 'Ali b. 'Isa. So he wrote a letter in their presence ( 31 ) to 'Ali b. 'Isa wherein he strove to exasperate the vizier against them, declaring that they were people who were proud of their powers of endurance, and had been withholding moneys which they owed ; they showed themselves indifferent to imprisonment and fetters ; unless the vizier gave the writer full powers to chastise them and extort the money from them, they would permanently retain it, and the example would be followed by the inhabitants of the Sawad, and the revenue cease to come in in consequence. The vizier however would be able to judge best._The prisoners said that they were in despair fearing that the VIZIERATE OF ‘ALI B. ‘ISA. 35 officer would be given full power to torture them to death, knowing what his feelings towards them were ; they thought of giving in, but finally decided to wait till the vizier's reply came. Presently there came a re¬ script in the vizier's own writing on the back of the letter : it was as follows : The land-tax, God preserve you, is a debt, for which the debtor may be arrested ; but beyond that you may not go. Greetings. Thus we were delivered, and we paid just what was due. When next year came, the revenue of Baduriyya increased 20 per cent., and we went so far as to sow on our rooves, such confidence had we in the justice of the government. When Abu ‘Ali Khaqani was cashiered, many docu¬ ments were forged in his name ; a number of grants of this sort were brought to ‘Ali b. Tsa, who, suspecting their genuineness, collected them and sent them to Khaqani, asking him to examine them and to report to him which were genuine and which were spurious. It so happened that when the messenger arrived, Abu ‘Ali Khaqani was saying his prayers ; the messenger in consequence placed the documents before his son Abu'l-Qasim, and delivered the message. Abu'l-Qasim began to separate the genuine from the spurious, but his father made a sign to him to stop. When he had finished his prayer, he took and glanced at them, then mixed them together and returned them to the messenger, saying : Give my greetings to the vizier and inform him that all these deeds are genuine. I ordered these grants, and use your discretion about ratifying them. When the messenger had retired, he said to his son : Did you want to make me incur people's hatred for no reason, and to be yourself the vizier's ( 32 ) catspaw ? We are out of office, so why should we not earn popularity by letting all these forged orders be ratified ? If they are ratified, we shall get the credit, whilst the loss will be sustained by him ; whereas if he nullify them, we shall 36 A.H. 301. Caliphate of Muqtadir. get the praise and he the blame.—People approved this action of Khaqani, and ‘Ali b. ‘Isa made himself disliked by the courtiers, the public and the retinue by with¬ drawing those additions which had come to be regarded by those who enjoyed them as their proper stipends, and by abolishing that expenditure which meant useless waste of money. His rule was thus found oppressive and was disliked and endeavours were made to vilify him, and set Muqtadir against him. Certain persons intrigued to restore the vizierate to Abu’l-Hasan Ibn al-Furat. This year saw Husain b. Mansur Hallaj arrested at Sus, and brought to Baghdad exposed on a camel; he had first been brought to ‘Ali b. Ahmad Rasibi, who brought him to the metropolis, where he was crucified alive, 1 with his follower, his wife's brother. The exe¬ cutions took place simultaneously on the two sides of the river. For a time Hallaj was imprisoned by himself in the Palace. It was ascertained both in Ahwaz and in Baghdad that he had claimed divinity, and asserted that the deity took up his abode in the nobles. 2 In the same year the vizier restored Abu ‘Ali Kha¬ qani to his liberty, and took him out of custody. Also ‘Ali b. A/rniad Rasibi died in the Dur al-Rasibi,3 and Mu'nis the Eunuch proceeded by the advice of ‘Ali b. Isa to seize his property. He wrote to Nu‘man b. ‘Abdallah to come and meet him for the purpose. He wrote that he had realized about a million dinars.4 1 The author is here anticipating. The execution of Hallaj is narrated in 309. 2 The family of ‘Ali is meant. 3 Name of a region in Khuzistan between Tib and Jundisabur, according to Yaqut, Geogr. ii. 217, who gives this person’s kunyah as Abu’l-Husain. He states that this man farmed land which paid the government 1,400,000 dinars annually and that he was allowed to rule his lands with little or no interference from headquarters. 4 In the account given by ‘Arib it is Muqtadir who sends to seize the property. The right of the Caliph to seize the estates of deceased persons was at this time recognised, VlZIERATE OF 'ALI B. 'ISA. 37 The same year a robe of honour was bestowed upon the prince AbuV Abbas Ibn Muqtadir, who was given conduct of the war in Egypt and the Maghrib ; Mu'nis the Eunuch was made his deputy in Egypt. The prince ‘Ali b. Muqtadir was put in charge of prayer, public security and war in the districts of Rayy, ( 33 ) Dinawand, Qazwin, Zanjan, Abhar and Tarm. In the same year there arrived news of the assassina¬ tion of Ahmad b. Isma'il b. Ahmad, ruler of Khorasan, on the bank of the river of Balkh at the hands of his retainers. He was succeeded by his son AbuT-TJasan Nasr, to whom a deed was sent by Muqtadir, investing him with the government of Khorasan in his father's stead. In the same year news arrived of the assassination of Abu Sa'id Jannabi #asan b. Bahram, who had made himself master of Hajr, at the hands of a eunuch; who, after assassinating his master had called one of his leading associates, telling him that he was summoned by the master ; when this person presented himself, the eunuch proceeded to assassinate him, and continued the like procedure until he had slain four chieftains : when he called a fifth, this chief suspected treachery, and cried out; his cries aroused the women who also shouted for help, when the eunuch was arrested before he could murder the fifth. The eunuch was then executed ; he was a Slav. Abu Sa‘id had designated his son Sa'id as his successor; he was however unequal to the business, and was ousted by his younger brother Abu Tahir Sulaiman b. #asan. In the year 299 the Qarmafians had appeared at the gate of Basrah, where the chief of the garrison was Mohammed b. Ishaq b. Kundajiq. It was a Friday, and people were at prayer, when the cry was raised : The Qarmafians ! The doorkeepers went out to them 38 A.H. 301. Caliphate of Muqtadir. and found two cavaliers, one of whom had dismounted and was seated leaning against the milestone with one leg over the other, where he was seen by the porters, while the other was in front of them. One of the Khawal 1 rushed at the second, thrust at him with his spear and killed him ; he then retired. The surviving Qarmadan burst into tears, ( 34 ) and was told to come back and drag away the corpse by the feet with the impreca¬ tion of God. They then asked him who he and his com¬ panion were ; he replied : Believers. He then crawled on the ground until he had got hold of his companion's body, whereupon the people entered the Mosque and locked the door. Ibn Kundajiq then rode at the head of his troops to the place, and his scouts, noticing a party at the Cisterns of #ajjaj, reported that they were about thirty horse. An attack was made upon this troop by Utarid b. Shihab Anbari with his staff, some retainers belonging to the garrison of Basrah, with some volun¬ teers ; most of these were killed, only those escaping who ran away before they came in sight of the enemy. The corpses were stripped by the Qarmadans, who left nothing upon them except their drawers whence they removed the tapes * and further inflicted horrible scourg¬ ing on them. Ibn Kundajiq retreated to Basrah whose gates he locked, and where he remained under cover of darkness. When morning broke, he saw no Qarmadans left. He wrote to Ibn al-Furat, who was vizier at the time, demanding help. The vizier despatched to his assistance Mohammed b. ‘Abdallah Fariqi at the head of a vast force, with a general taken from the ranks named Qurawaihi and Ja'far of Zaranj with a company of infantry to help Ibn Kundajiq. When ‘Ali b. Tsa assumed the vizierate he was con¬ sulted by Muqtadir on the subject of the Qarmadans and advised that correspondence should be started with Name lor a class of the population in Basrah, which occurs later. VIZIERATE OF 'ALI B. 'ISA. 39 Abu Sa'id #asan b. Bahrain Jannabi; the Caliph there¬ upon gave the vizier instructions to write a letter to this chief and despatch it by the messenger whom he deemed suitable. He wrote a long letter wherein he bade the Qarmadan remember Allah, and invited him to obey the Caliph. At the end he said: The Commander of the Faithful makes this offer his advocate against thee and his plea against thee with God and his refutation of all thy excuses ; on the other hand it is a door to protect thee if thou accept the boons which he offers and the honourable investi¬ ture which he is prepared to vouchsafe unto thee. The envoys proceeded on their mission, but when they reached Basrah they learned of the murder of Abu Sa'id ; accordingly they went no further ( 35 ) until they had communicated the intelligence to the vizier ‘Ali b. Tsa and requested his further instructions. He replied with an order to proceed to the children of Abu Sa id or his successors. So they finished the journey, delivered the letter and communicated their message. The Qar- maZians sent a reply, and released the captives whose cause the messengers had pleaded. The messengers returned with them to Baghdad. Year 302. This year saw the arrest of Abu 'Abdallah H usain b. 'Abdallah known as Ibn al-Jassas Jauhari . 1 A band of men was sent to his residence to convey him to the Palace, where he was made to deliver money and jewels to the value of four million dinars. He claimed to possess far more than this, indeed he went far beyond twenty million dinars in his assessment of his wealth. ( 36 ) There was a rising this year headed by tf usain b. 'Ali the 'Alid, who got possession of Tabaristan and took the title al-Dai " the Summoner.” The brother of Su'luk sent an army against the insurgents, who retired ; 1 The source of this person’s wealth is explained in the Table Talk. 40 A.H. 303. Caliphate of Muqtadir. but when the army went home, the ‘Alid returned to Tabaristan. 1 Year 303. In this year there came the news that ZZusain b. Z/amdan had raised the standard of revolt; Mu nis the Eunuch was at this time absent from the capital, having been despatched to Egypt to oppose the 'Alid ruler of the Maghrib, who was invading Egypt with a force of over 40,000 men. The vizier 'Ali b. Tsa accordingly commissioned the elder Ra’iq to deal with ZZusain b. //amdan, and gave him a robe of honour ; at the same time he wrote to Mu'nis to acquaint him with the facts and order him to march to Diyar Mudar so soon as he could leave Egypt, and bring with him Ahmad b. Kaighalagh, 'Ali b. Ahmad b. Bistam, and ‘Abbas b. ‘Amr to put the affairs of the Diyar in order, stop the dis¬ integration, and guard the frontiers, especially those of the Jazirah, where Hisn Mansur had suffered terribly from the invasion of the Byzantines, 2 who had made captives of all the population of the region ; the soldiers having been unable to execute the summer raid owing to their being occupied with ZZusain b. Z/amdan. When Ra'iq went to attack ZZusain b. H amdan, he was defeated by the rebel, and fled to Mu'nis, who was urged by the vizier 'Ali b. Tsa in a series of letters to hasten to repel ZZusain. Mu'nis proceeded by forced marches, but when he was near ZZusain, the latter sent his secretary Harun to negotiate, and proceedings commenced of which an account was sent by Mu’nis to 'Ali b. Tsa. In this he stated that Harun had brought him an epistle from ZZusain containing a lengthy discourse wherein at the commencement, at the close, and in various sections, he reiterated the assertion that what had driven him to abandon his loyalty was the vizier's alarming change 1 In Browne’s Ibn Isfandiyar, p. 199, a different account of this matter is given. 2 Saint-Martin xiii. 407 thinks the invaders were Armenians. VlZIERATE OF 'AlI B. 'ISA. 41 of attitude towards him, and his failure (37) to carry out certain undertakings which he had made. He added that he had now a force of 30,000 men collected from the Arab tribes and the men of the ‘Ashirah. Mu'nis asked the envoy what proposals Husain had committed to him to deliver, and the reply was that Husain requested Mu’nis to remain in Harran, where there was room for his army, and write to the vizier to intercede for him, with the request that he be relieved of the offices which he was holding, and be allowed to remain in his own resi¬ dence, while his brother was to be invested with the government of Diyar Rabi'ah. Mu'nis informed the envoy that these proposals were wholly inadmissible, since the vizier was constantly urging him to advance ; the vizier's orders could not be disobeyed, but he, Mu'nis, would not fail to communicate the requests of Husain to the vizier, while in no wise swerving from the line which the vizier had marked out for him. If Husain determined to give him battle, then he, Mu'nis, would rely on the help of God against all who rebelled against the Sultan, and were ungrateful for his benefits. If Husain yielded to the truth and walked in its path, by surrendering himself to Mu'nis, and abandoning his de¬ signs, that conduct would best become him ; but if he declined, and remained in his attitude of defiance and mock-heroism, then Mu'nis would meet him with the whole manhood of Mudar, and would spare the Sultans troops the indignity of exposing themselves, overwhelm¬ ing as were their numbers, to Husain's riffraff, not out of reluctance to meet him on the battlefield, but out of contempt for him. He added that he had put the envoy, his secretary, in custody and would not give him leave to return until he had heard the decision of Husain. Then there came tidings that Mu'nis had continued his march and encamped opposite the Jazirat Ibn ‘Umar, while Husain had taken the direction of Armenia with A.H. 303. Caliphate of Muqtadir. his baggage, his children and his goods. The army of Husain then began to fall away and desert in groups to Mu’nis. Presently a despatch came from Mu'nis stating that seven hundred horsemen, all either commanders, or retainers or counsellors or high officials in the army of #usain, had deserted to him ; that he had bestowed robes of honour on most of them, and in the process exhausted his supplies of robes and of money , he was devising expedients for obtaining the rest of what he required. Then came a despatch from him announcing the capture of #usain b. tfamdan with all his family and most of his followers. The estates of all the Haxn- danids were seized, and Mu’nis entered Baghdad with i/usain and his son. After two days #usain was conveyed from the Shammasiyyah Gate to the Palace ( 38 ) attached to a cross on an “ ostrich ” 1 erected on the top of the back of a camel with two humps ; his son was exposed on another camel; and burnooses were on their heads. In front of him went the prince Abu’l-'Abbas son of Muq¬ tadir, the vizier ‘Ali b. Tsa, the Commander-in-Chief Mu’nis the eunuch, Abu’l-Haija ‘Abdallah b. #amdan, Ibrahim b. #amdan and the other generals with the troops and the elephants. When they reached the Palace, Husain was made to stand in front of Muq¬ tadir, who ordered him to be given to the charge of the Stewardess Zaidan, who kept him confined in the Palace. After his arrival the iiujari infantry mutinied and burned the stables of the vizier from whom they de¬ manded an increase of pay. This was accorded ; three dinars a month for each pay-month to the retainers and three quarters of a dinar to the infantry. The mutiny then ceased. Apparently the name for some erection of wood. VIZIERATE OF 'Au B. ‘ISA. 43 Further arrests were made of Abu’l-Haija ‘Abdallah b. Hamdan and all his brothers, and they were im¬ prisoned in the Palace. A son of Husain b. Hamdan had fled with a number of his followers and got as far as Amid where he was assailed by al-Jazari , 1 who slew him and a number of his followers. Their heads were then sent to the capital and some of the followers of Husain b. Hamdan were crucified. Year 304. In this year a retainer of ‘Ali b. Wahsudhan the Dailemite (who was minister of public security in Ispa¬ han) met there Ahmad b. Sayyah administrator of the kharaj there, the retainer having been sent by his master to him on some errand. ( 39 ) It so happened that the retainer met the administrator when he was riding and addressed him about his business. This offended A/raiad b. SayyaA, who said to him : Do you, a hireling, talk to me about business on the highway ?—The retainer was vexed at this and returning to his master told him what had happened. His master said the other was quite right ; “If you were not a hireling you would have struck his head with your sword when he talked to you in that style.”—The retainer went back, and, finding Ibn Sayya/^ on his way home, struck him with the sword and killed him. The Sultan was offended at this proceeding and dismissed ‘Ali b. Wahsudhan from the government of Ispahan on account of it, replacing him by Ahmad b. Masrur Balkhi. ‘Ali b. Wahsudhan asked permission to return to the Dailemite country and obtained it. Presently Mu’nis the eunuch interceded on his account and the Sultan was reconciled. He then took up his abode in the region of the Jabal. In the same year Mohammed b. ‘Ali b. Su‘luk cousin of the governor of Khorasan came to Baghdad demanding protection and received a robe of honour. 1 Probably corrupt for al-Khazari, i.e., SIma , mentioned above. 44 A.H. 304. Caliphate of Muqtadir. In the summer season the common people were alarmed by a creature which they call zabzab , and pro¬ fessed to see at night on the rooves of their houses, and which they said devoured their small children. Indeed it would bite off the hand of a sleeping man or the breast of a sleeping woman and devour it. They would keep guard against it the whole night and take care not to sleep ; and they would beat mugs, cups or mortars to frighten it. Baghdad was in a state of terror in con¬ sequence, until the Sultan got hold of a strange white beast like a sea-hound, which he declared was the zabzab and had been caught. This was suspended on an “ ostrich ” upon the Upper Bridge, and left there till it died. This made little impression till the moon waxed and the people could see that there was no reality about what they had imagined. Then they were appeased ; only meanwhile the thieves had found their chance, when the people were occupied with watching on their rooves, and there were many burglaries. In this year ‘Ali b. Tsa ascertained beyond a doubt that there was an intrigue to restore Ibn al-Furat to the vizierate ; so he offered to resign the post, only Muq¬ tadir declined to accept his resignation. It was given out in the ( 40 ) Palace that Ibn al-Furat was seriously ill; and as it so happened that the rebel who was im¬ prisoned in the Palace died 1 —it being the practice to conceal the death of a captive rebel to whom his associ¬ ates give the title Imam (Pontiff), since so long as he remains alive they do not appoint another, whereas when his death is ascertained they make a new appointment— it was given out in the Palace that Ibn al-Furat was dead ; thereupon the rebel was laid out, and his obse¬ quies performed under the name of Ibn al-Furat, the prayer being said by the vizier ‘Ali b. Tsa, who then went home in great distress, declaring that the art of despatch- 1 Harun, caught by Husain b Hamdan in 283. Second Vizierate of I bn al-Furat. 45 writing had passed away that day. Then, as the days passed, ‘Ali b. Tsa learned from numerous sources of the success of the intrigue in favour of Ibn al-Furat and that he was still alive. He told his friends that a man ought not to talk about all that he hears. At times he used to be disgusted by the misconduct of the courtiers and the outrageous character of their demands, and request permission from Muqtadir to quit his office ; Muqtadir used to chide him for making this request, until one day—at the end of Dhu’l-Qa’dah 304 (May 25, 917)—he received a visit from Umm Musa the Stewardess, who wished to arrange with him the sum to be distributed at the Feast of the Sacrifice among the hareem and the attendants of the court. 'Ali b. Tsa was not receiving visitors and his chamberlain Salamah did not venture to announce her, so he dismissed her courteously instead. This made her very angry ; when 'Ali b. Tsa learned of her arrival and dismissal, he ordered some one to find her and make his excuses, hoping that she might come back ; she declined, and going to Muqtadir and the Queen-mother set them against him with false tales. In consequence Muqtadir removed him from office and arrested him on Monday morning 8 Dhu’l-Hijjah, 304 (June 2, 917) when he was riding to the Palace. His property and estates and those of his dependents were not touched ; nor was anything done to any of his children. He was placed in the custody of Zaidan the Stewardess, ( 41 ) having held office this time for three years, ten months and twenty-eight davs. Second vizierate of Abu’l-Hasan 'Ali b. Mohammed b. al-Furat. On 8 Dhu’l-iftjjah of this year Abud-#asan was invested with the vizierate and the headship of the bureaux, and after receiving a robe of honour went to his palace in Mukharrim which had been given him in fief 46 A.H. 304. Caliphate of Muqtadir. during his first vizierate. He sent letters to the pro vinces and chief cities in the name of Muqtadir an- nouncing his restoration to the vizierate, ( 42 ) t e tex being composed by Abu'l-Hasan Mohammed b. Ja far b. Thawabah ; the following is a passage from it. Inasmuch as the Commander of the Faithful found him indispensable and necessary to the empire, and the clerks of the bureaux in their different orders and ranks all acknowledged his mastery., admitted his competence, re¬ ferred their differences to him, regarded him as the ideal of their aspirations, and were convinced that he is the astute statesman, the experienced man of affairs, who knows how the milk of revenue is to be drawn and its sources are to be tapped, the Commander of the Faithful drew him from his sheath, and the old sharpness of his blade returned, so that he began steering the state as though he had never been away from the helm, and managed its business as though he had never left it. And the Commander of the Faithful thought fit to omit to pay him no form of honour which had originally been his, and to bestow on him anew all kinds of recompenses and rewards which had been with¬ drawn from him ; he has therefore addressed him by his kunyah, &c., &c. Ibn al-Furat proceeded to arrest the dependents of ‘Ali b. 'Isa, his brothers, clerks, and all his deputies in the Sawad, the East and the West; and he fined them all with the exception of ABu'L-ii/usAiN and Abu'l-Hasan the two sons of Abu’l-Baghl, whom he confirmed in their appointments in Ispahan and Basrah, owing to the interest displayed in them by Umm Musa. He arrested besides Abu ‘Ali Khaqani and persecuted his dependents, imposing on all a second fine which they were made to pay. He inflicted fines on all the dis¬ charged officials, and made them reveal their secret profits and refund them. He even established a “ Secret Profits' Bureau," having undertaken to pay Second Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 47 Muqtadir and his mother fifteen hundred dinars a day from this source. The sum was entered in the accounts under that head, and he was bound to furnish it without fail; of the amount a thousand dinars went daily to Muqtadir himself, three hundred and thirty-three and a third to the Queen-mother, and a hundred and sixty-six dinars and two thirds to the two princes Abu'l-'Abbas and Harun. Ibn al-Furat found himself well supplied with funds owing to his predecessor's having collected some of the kharaj ( 43 ) in advance, i.e. } before the commencement of the new financial year, and having started doing this ten days before his discharge from office ; this sum had been deposited by him in the Treasury, to be expended at the Feast on presents to the court-dependents, the cavalry and the Turks. This sum strengthened the hands of Ibn al-Furat, who had besides a vast amount which had been realized from the fines, guarantees, 1 and letters of credit, which had arrived from Fars, Ispahan and the Eastern provinces within letters announcing the despatch of goods, on the supposition that they would come into the hands of ‘Ali b. Tsa. Ibn al-Furat expended the whole on the cavalry, the court-attendants, the servants, and important purposes. The person who had control over the bureaux and the administration in general during Ibn al-Furat's second vizierate from among all the clerks was Abu Bishr ‘Abdallah b. Farajawaihi. The reason of this was that at the time of Ibn al-Furat's first arrest he con¬ trived to escape, and remained in hiding during the ministries of Khaqani and ‘Ali b. Tsa. When a year of the latter's ministry had passed, he began to corre¬ spond with Ibn al-Furat through the mediation of Tsa the Physician, receiving replies from the ex-vizier, who 1 The reference is probably to sums which individuals had undertaken to extort from deposed officials and the like, if the latter were given into their power. 48 A.H. 304. Caliphate of Muqtadir. gave him drafts of letters which he was to address ashis own to Muqtadir, containing criticisms of ‘Ali b. ‘Isa, his clerks and his deputies, and pointing out how the vizier never fined any official whom he had employed, on the principle that having once trusted a man, he was not going to treat him as unfaithful. Further he was to call attention to delays in the payment of salaries to the royal children, the members of the hareem and the court-attendants, he having reduced the pay-year of the princes and the hareem to eight months and that of the dependents and servants to six months , and having diminished the 150,000 dinars paid every month to the cavalry by two-thirds. Muqtadir would show these letters to Ibn al-Furat, who assured the Caliph that Ibn Farajawaihi was an expert in these affairs, and that all his assertions were veracious. Muqtadir in consequence began to think of dismissing ‘Ali b. ‘Isa, only when he consulted Munis on the subject, the latter would dissuade him from this step, assuring him that ‘Ali b. ‘Isa was honest and trustworthy. ( 44 ) But when Mu’nis departed for Egypt on his expedition against the ‘Alid of N. Africa, Ibn Farajawaihi found the opportunity for a more strenuous campaign against ‘Ali b. ‘Isa, whose interests were defended during the absence of Mu‘nis by Gharib, the Queen-mother’s brother, and Nasr the Chamberlain. When Ibn Farajawaihi learned how these two persons were championing ‘Ali b. ‘Isa, he wrote a letter with his own hand to Muqtadir, promising that if ‘Ali b. ‘Isa were dismissed and ‘Ali b. Mohammed b. al-Furat installed in his place, he would restore the allowances of the princes, the hareem, the attendants and the disbanded cavalry resident in the metropolis to what they had been during his former vizier ate,; these should be regularly paid in full. Further he would undertake to provide out of the fines levied on discharged officials, from secret profits refunded, and from fees for continuance in office in the different provinces, 45,000 dinars every lunar month, Second Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 49 Muqtadir communicated this letter to Ibn al-Furat, who declared it to be absolutely accurate, and signed a document guaranteeing all this. These letters were one of the chief causes of the favour shown by Ibn al-Furat to Ibn Farajawaihi in his second vizierate. It further happened that Ibn al-Furat had deposited through him vast sums with various traders and clerks, and did not reveal the existence of these in the statement of his assets, since he did not know the names of the de¬ positories. When Ibn al-Furat again became vizier, Ibn Farajawaihi recovered all these deposits without any loss. Abu 'Ali Ibn Muqlah had been without employ¬ ment during the ministries of Khaqani and 'Ali b. Tsa, not leaving his residence. In the former ministry he was in hiding, and though he received a free pardon from the latter, still he did not leave his residence. Ibn al- Furat was grateful for his fidelity and favoured him on this account. Account of the proceedings of Ibn Abi’l-Saj during these frequent changes in the ministry. When Yusuf Ibn Abi’l-Saj learned of the dismissal of 'Ali b. Tsa, ( 45 ) he was still in Adharbaijan, where during the first vizierate of Ibn al-Furat he was minister of prayer, war, public security, kharaj and the public Estates as well as for Armenia; these provinces he held in fief in consideration of a sum of money to be paid by him annually into the treasury of Baghdad. During the first vizierate of Ibn al-Furat he paid it in regularly ; but when the office was successively held by Abu 'Ali Khaqani and 'Ali b. Isa, his ambition was aroused and he delayed payment of most of what was due for his fief; thus he amassed a sum which made him powerful and encouraged him to revolt. 50 A.H. 304. Caliphate of Muqtadir. The plans of Ibn Abi’l-Saj. He declared that ‘Ali b. ‘Isa just before his dismissal had sent out to him a standard with investiture by the Caliph with the ministry of war in Rayy and Qazwm, Abhar and Zanjan, and departed in haste for his new province. When he approached it, it was quitted by Mohammed b. ‘Ali Su'luk, 1 who fled to the region of Khorasan. This Mohammed b. ‘Ali had originally con¬ quered the province, and afterwards obtained the right to farm the kharaj and the public Estates on easy terms, though even these he did not keep. When Ibn al-Furat learned of the proceedings of Ibn Abi'l-Saj, he com¬ municated them to Muqtadir ; after some days there arrived a despatch from Ibn Abi'l-Saj demanding grati¬ tude for the expulsion of Mohammed b. ‘Ali Su‘luk from Rayy and the neighbourhood, and congratulating the Sultan on their reconquest. He stated further that so soon as he had received the standard and the deed of investiture from ‘Ali b. ‘Isa he had marched thither and God had vouchsafed him victory. This angered Muq¬ tadir, who instructed Ibn al-Furat to communicate the despatch of Ibn Abi'l-Saj to ‘Ali b. ‘Isa; the latter was therefore brought out of the place where he was con¬ fined, and treated with consideration by the vizier who said to him gently : This may have been a plan devised by you against Su‘luk, and to this there would be no objection. The ex-vizier however swore that he had given no such appointment to Ibn Abi'l-Saj, and had sent him no standard and no deed of investiture. He then observed that a standard ( 46 ) and a deed of investiture can only be despatched with one of the Sultan's ministers or generals ; the ministers and generals were all present and had best be asked. Further the correspondence • bureau had a special official charged with the composi¬ tion of deeds of appointment and investiture ; he too should be asked whether he had ever written such a deed. 1 Cf. above p. 39. The statements seem irreconcileable. Second Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 51 Ibn al-Furat made his predecessor set his signature to this statement, which he laid before Muqtadir, whose resentment against Ibn Abi'l-Saj was increased. Ibn al-Furat in consequence wrote both in the Caliph's name and his own a severely worded and menacing letter to Ibn Abi'l-Saj ; and sent an expedition from the capital to fight him, under the leadership of Khaqan Muflihi, afterwards reinforced by various commanders, considerable sums being spent on their equipment. Among them were such generals as Ahmad b. Masrur of Balkh, Sima the Khazari, Nihrir the younger, and others of their rank. This force was attacked by Ibn Abi'l-Saj, who defeated Khaqan, and made many of his followers prisoners, whom he then led in triumph into Rayy. Mu'nis at this time arriving from the frontier, was commissioned with the war against Ibn Abi'l-Saj ; he departed at once for this purpose and wrote to all the generals on his line of march to join him ; his protection was sought by Ahmad b. ‘Ali Su'luk , 1 who was well received; he deprived Khaqan of the government of the Jabal, giving his place to NiArir the Younger. A series of letters now came from Ibn Abi'l-Saj, de¬ siring reconciliation with the government, and offering 700,000 dinars for the control of the kharaj and the Estates in the district of Rayy and the neighbourhood, net, i.e., undertaking himself to defray the charges of the officials in those regions and other permanent expendi¬ ture. Muqtadir would not assent to this proposal; so he next wrote asking to be allowed to remain in Rayy in charge of public security and the war-office only, while the ministries of prayer, of kharaj , of the Estates, of justice, of the post, of intelligence, of the despatch- bags 2 and of alms should be held over for officials to be 1 This person is sometimes called A/miad, sometimes Mohammed : and often "the brother of Su'luk.” 2 Probably the letters and parcels intended for the Caliph. 52 A.H. 304. Caliphate of Muqtadir. sent by the Sultan to those regions. Muqtadir however persisted in his refusal, informing him that however much he might offer he should not be allowed to retain the government of Rayy for a single day owing to his having ventured to enter the province without orders. So when Ibn Abil-Saj realized this, he departed from Rayy and its territory, ( 47 ) after having ravaged it, and collected within a short space the tax for the year 304. Mu’nis then appointed as governor Wasif Bek- TIMURI. Ibn Abil-Saj would now have been satisfied to be freshly invested with his former government 1 ; and Ibn al-Furat recommended that this proposal be accepted, even guaranteeing that he would compel him to furnish in return a respectable sum to the treasury ; but it was opposed by Nasr the Chamberlain and Ibn al-i/awari, who held that he ought not to be confirmed in the government of Armenia and Adharbaijan until he had come to the metropolis and “ trodden the Sultan s carpet.” They charged Ibn al-Furat with being in league with him. Muqtadir in consequence insisted that the war against him must proceed unless he came to the metropolis, and ordered Mu’nis to march against him with all speed. When Ibn Abil-Saj found himself in danger of his life, he proceeded to engage Mu’nis in Sarat in Adhar¬ baijan ; the latter was defeated and retreated to Zanjan. Of the generals of the government Sima was killed in this battle, and many of Mu'nis’s officers were taken prisoners by Ibn Abil-Saj, among them Hilal b. Badr; these were led by him in triumph into Ardabil. Mu’nis stayed in Zanjan collecting forces to lead against Yusuf (Ibn Abil-Saj), who continued to send him letters with proposals ; Ibn Abil-Saj desired terms of peace, whereas 1 i.e. Adharbairjan and Armenia. Second Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 53 Mu nis declined all conditions except the appearance of the other at the metropolis. Ibn Abid-Saj had spared the defeated Mu’nis, allowing him to escape with three hundred retainers ; he might have taken him prisoner had he wished, and Mu’nis was grateful for this service. 1 ( 48 ) In Mu^arram of the following year during the vizier¬ ate of Hamid b. l'Abbas Mu’nis fought a second battle with Yusuf b. Abi’l-Saj in Ardabil, when the latter was wounded ( 49 ) and taken prisoner. Mu’nis brought him back to Baghdad ; and in the year 307 2 Ibn ( 50 ) Abi’l-Saj was brought into the city in triumph from the Shammasiyyah Gate mounted on a camel with a burnouse on his head, the army marching in front of him, until they reached the Palace. There he was made to stand before Muqtadir and he was presently imprisoned in the Palace in the custody of the Stewardess Zaidan, who treated him kindly. Mu’nis was decorated with a robe of honour, a necklace and a bracelet. Robes of honour were bestowed on many of his officers also, and the infantry received an addition to their pay of half a dinar a month per head. 1 Account of the same affair from the ‘Uyun. And in the year 806 Mu'nis marched from Hamadhan to Abhar to fight Ibn Abi’l-Saj ; the news which reached Mu’nis described the insurgent as in a dis¬ organized state, and about to evacuate his quarters, having been deserted by his brothers. While Mu’nis made Abhar his objective, Ibn Abi’l-Saj made Ardabil his. He was pursued by Mu’nis who presently came up with him. A pitched battle was then fought, resulting in the defeat of Mu’nis ; the place where his treasure was secreted was discovered and it was seized before his eyes. Yusuf pursued but without vigour, and Mu’nis retreated before him till he had ascended the hill; his extreme rear was overtaken by Sabuk, retainer of Ibn Abi’l-Saj, who slaughtered great numbers and took some captives. Those who had climbed the hill escaped ; but the camp of Mu’nis was plundered and innumer¬ able mules and camels seized. Mu’nis got to Zanjan where his troops joined him, and after staying there five days he proceeded to Qazwin, where he remained two months. Here news reached him of the arrest of Ibn al-Furat, who was suspected of encouraging Ibn Abi'l-Saj, and also supplies from Baghdad of money, war material, bedding and camels, while reinforcements led by the local governors continued to arrive. Then he was joined by Ibn Famdan, who delivered himself up, to the gratification of Mu’nis, who gave him a robe of honour. The troops collected in Zanjan presently became too numerous for the place, and when a severe winter accompanied by snow set in, Mu’nis distributed his forces in various places, himself remaining in Zanjan, where he was joined by Mahir the eunuch bringing 100,000 dinars in coin from Baghdad, which was welcome to Mu'nis. 8 Began June 3 f 919, 54 A.H. 304. Caliphate of Muqtadir. When Mu’nis had departed from Adharbaijan and returned to Baghdad taking Yusuf b. Dewadadh (Ibn Abi’l-Saj) with him, the province was seized by Sabuk, 1 retainer of the latter. Against him Mu’nis despatched Mohammed b. ‘Abdallah Fariqi, on whom he bestowed the governorship ) he was at the time on the frontier of Armenia, and at once marched against Sabuk, who however defeated him, and remained in control of the province, while Fariqi retreated to Baghdad. Sabuk then wrote to the Sultan requesting to be allowed to retain the province as a fief, and these proposals were accepted; the condition being that he should pay annually 220,000 dinars. Accordingly the robes of honour and the deed of investiture were sent out to him ; but he did not pay the money to which he had agreed. When Mu’nis had overcome Yusuf b. Abi’l-Saj and prior to his quitting Adharbaijan, he had made ‘Ali b. Wahsudhan minister of war in Rayy, Dinawand, Qazwin, Zanjan and Abhar, assigning the proceeds of the taxes there to him and his troops ; to Ahmad b. ‘Ali Su'luk he gave ( 51 ) the ministry of public security in Ispahan and Qumm, assigning to him and his troops the kharaj and Estates in Qumm and Sawah, amounting to more than 200,000 dinars a year. Shortly after this Ahmad b. Musafir, prince of Farm, assassinated his brother’s son ‘Ali b. Wahsudhan, with whom he was staying in the neighbourhood of Qazwin ; the victim was in his bed at the time. The assassin then fled to his own country. A/tmad b. ‘Ali brother of Su'luk was at the time resident in Qumm ; after the murder he went and established himself in Rayy. This act dis¬ pleased the Sultan, who proceeded to invest Wasif Bektimuri with the offices formerly held by ‘Ali b. Wahsudhan, while giving the commander of the army Mohammed b. Sulaiman control of the kharaj and the 1 Called Spkhi in the Armenian chronicle of Stephanos of Taron, p. 124. Second Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 55 Estates. A/rniad b. ‘Ali Su‘luk was ordered to return to Qumm, and obeyed ; but presently relations between him and Mohammed b. Sulaiman became strained, and throwing off his allegiance he dismissed the officials of the kharaj and the Estates in Qumm and made prepara¬ tions for the invasion of Rayy. Ni#rir the younger, governor of Hamadhan, received orders to march to Rayy and unite with Wasif Bektimuri and Mohammed b. Sulaiman to resist A/rniad b. ‘Ali (52) Su‘luk. The last advanced to the gate of Rayy, and defeated Wasif and Mohammed b. Sulaiman ; the former retreated to Hamadhan, and the latter was killed in the battle ; Rayy came into the possession of AAmad b. ‘Ali Su‘luk, who now endeavoured to make his peace with the Sultan, wherein he was aided by Nasr the Chamberlain ; he was to farm the kharaj of Rayy, Dinawand, Qazwin, Zanjan and Abhar for 166,000 dinars to be sent annually to the metropolis ; the Estates in these regions were put under the control of Mohammed b. Khalaf Nirmani, who drove A/rniad b. ‘Ali Su‘luk out of Qumm and in¬ stalled his own agents there. We now return to the story of Ibn al-Furat. When the vizier Abud-ifasan Ibn al-Furat became aware of the enmity of Nasr the Chamberlain and Abu'l- Qasim Ibn Al-#awari, and Shafi‘ Lu’lu'i, and how they charged him with encouraging Ibn Abi’l-Saj to rebel, he resolved on retaliation, and refused most of their demands; he further deprived Nasr and Shah' of most of their offices. Ibn al-Furat had appointed Abu ‘Ali Ibn Muqlah secretary to Nasr the Chamberlain ; presently Abu ‘Ali Ibn Muqlah felt aggrieved by Ibn al-Furat taking into his employ Sa‘id b. Ibrahim Tus- tari ; so he communicated to Nasr the fact that Ibn al-Furat had recovered from deposits which had remained intact the sum of 500,000 dinars, and that after he had sworn at the time of his fall that there re- 56 A.H. 305. Caliphate of Muqtadir. mained among his assets no deposit which he had not acknowledged. Nasr mentioned this to Muqtadir with the view of incensing him against Ibn al-Furat , and he with Ibn al-#awari held out to Abu ‘Ali Ibn Muqlah the hope of the vizierate in order to make him reveal secrets of Ibn al-Furat’s, calculated to arouse the ire of Muqtadir. After a time this fact came out and was even a matter of public notoriety ; the nephew of Ibn al-Furat, AbuY-Khattab Ibn Abi l- Abbas Ibn al- Furat, went to the vizier and told him what people were saying : but Ibn al-Furat replied that he might as well doubt his own children or his nephew (who brought the information) as doubt Abu ‘Ali Ibn Muqlah, whom he had brought up and protected. Afterwards Ibn al- Furat became convinced of the truth of what was alleged ( 53 ) concerning Ibn Muqlah. whom he proceeded to inform of some things that had reached his ears about Ibn Muqlah’s discussions of his affairs ; Ibn al-Furat professed surprise at such rumours, hoping to divert Ibn Muqlah from the course which he was pursuing ; but he only succeeded in alarming Ibn Muqlah, who, fearing lest Ibn al-Furat might speedily ruin him, increased his efforts to ruin Ibn al-Furat, and made Nasr the Chamber- lain his protector. Year 305. This year Baghdad was visited by two envoys 1 from the Byzantine Emperor, who had come by the Euphrates route, bringing splendid presents and numerous marks of friendship, and soliciting a truce. Their entry was on Mu/^arram 2 (June 25, 917), and they were housed in the palace of Sa‘id b. Makhlad. 2 Ibn al-Furat gave orders that this residence should be specially furnished and provided with all utensils, &c., which they could require, and that they and their retinue 1 See Lebeau—Saint-Martin xii. 409 ; their names were Joannes Radecnos and Michael Toxaras. 2 Vizier of Mu'tadid ; his palace is mentioned by Tabari iii. 2146, Second Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 57 should be liberally provided with supplies, including animals for food and sweets. They solicited an audi¬ ence of Muqtadir for the purpose of delivering the letter which they had brought; they were told that this was a matter of great difficulty, only possible after an inter¬ view with his vizier, informing him of their design, arranging the matter with him, and requesting him to facilitate the granting of the audience and to advise the Caliph to accord their petition. Abu 'Umar 'Adi b. ‘Abd al-Baqi, who had escorted them from the frontier requested AbuT-i7asan Ibn al-Furat to permit them to visit him and he promised them an interview on a day which he named. 1 ♦ The vizier gave orders that the soldiers should line the streets the whole way from the palace of Sa'id to the palace which he (the vizier) occupied in Mukharrim, and that his own retainers and troops with the vice¬ chamberlains posted in his palace should form a line from the doorway of the palace to the reception-room. A vast saloon with gilt roof in the wing of the palace called the Garden Wing was splendidly furnished and hung with curtains resembling carpets ; on fresh fur¬ niture, carpets and curtains a sum of ( 54 ) 30,000 dinars was expended. No mode of beautifying the palace or increasing the magnificence of the occasion was neglected. The vizier himself sat on a splendid praying-carpet, with a lofty throne behind him, with serving-men in front and behind, to the right and to the left, while the saloon was filled with military and civil officials ; the two envoys were then introduced having witnessed on their way such troops and crowds as might well fill them with awe. When they had entered the public apartments, they were told to sit down in the veranda, the apartment 1 The scene is also described by Khadb Baghdadi after Hilal. See the Manar 1335, pp. 633-637. 58 A.H. 305. Caliphate of Muqtadir. being filled with troops ; they were then taken down a long passage behind this veranda, which brought them to the quadrangle of the Garden, whence they took a turning which led them to the room in which the vizier was seated. The magnificence of the room and of its furniture and the crowd of attendants formed an impres sive spectacle. They were accompanied by Abu ‘Umar Ibn ‘Abd al-Baqi as interpreter, and there was. present Nizar b. Mohammed, prefect of police, with his whole force. They were made to stand before the vizier Abu’l-#asan Ibn al-Furat, whom they saluted, their words being interpreted by the person mentioned ; and the vizier made a reply which was also interpreted by him. They preferred a request for the redemption of the captives, and solicited the vizier's services in obtain¬ ing the assent of Muqtadir to this. He informed them that he would have to interview the Caliph on the sub¬ ject, and would then have to act according to the in¬ structions which he received. They solicited from him an introduction to the Caliph, and he promised that he would procure one. They were then discharged, and, led out by the same route as that whereby they had entered, returned to the Palace of Sa'id, the soldiers still lining the road in full dress and perfect equipment. The uniform consisted of royal satin tunics, with close- fitting caps over which were satin hoods pointed at the top. Ibn al-Furat then applied to Muqtadir for leave to introduce the envoys and instructed him in the answer which he was to give them ; he then commanded all the officials, civil and military, and all ranks of the army to ride in the direction of the imperial Palace, and to line the streets on horseback from the palace of Sa'id thither. These orders were carried out and the cavalry stationed themselves as directed in full dress and com¬ plete armour. The vizier further ordered that the open courts, the vestibules and the passages of the Palace Second Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 59 should be filled with armed men, and that ( 55 ) the whole castle should be furnished magnificently. After finish¬ ing these preparations and seeing that every detail was carried out he bade the envoys present themselves. They rode to the Palace and were greatly impressed by the spectacle through which they passed ; the numbers of soldiers, their splendid uniforms and their perfect equipment. When they reached the Palace they were taken into a corridor which led into one of the quad¬ rangles, thence they turned into another corridor which led to a quadrangle wider than the first, and the chamber¬ lains kept conducting them through corridors and quadrangles until they were weary with tramping and bewildered. These corridors and quadrangles were all crowded with retainers and servants. Finally they approached the saloon in which Muqtadir was to be found, where the officers of state were standing according to their different ranks, while Muqtadir was seated on his imperial throne, with Abu'l-#asan Ibn al-Furat standing near him, and Mu'nis the eunuch with the officers next in order to him stationed on his right and left. When they entered the saloon they kissed the ground and stationed themselves where they were told by Nasr the Chamberlain to stand ; they then delivered their master's missive, proposing a redemption of captives, and preferred a request for its favourable acceptance. The vizier replied for the Caliph that he accepted the proposal out of compassion for the Moslems and the desire to set them free, and out of his zeal to obey God and deliver them. He would, he added, send Mu'nis to be present when the exchange took place. When the envoys left the imperial presence they were presented with poplin cloaks adorned with gold and turbans of the same material, and similar honours were bestowed on the interpreter Abu ‘Umar, who rode home with them, while the troops remained drawn up as before for the ransoming to take place. Mu’nis at once made 60 A.H. 306. Caliphate of Muqtadir. arrangements for this ; the Byzantine captives, on whose account the envoys had come, were purchased when the envoys desired to purchase them, while Mu ms and the officers who were to travel with him received 170,000 dinars from the Baghdad treasury for their undertaking. Mu’nis wrote to the governors of the lands through which he was to pass, bidding them furnish what he should require. To each of the envoys a private present of 20,000 dirhems was given ; they then left Baghdad with Mu’nis accompanied by Abu ‘Umar. The re¬ demption was carried through this same year under the supervision of Mu'nis. This year Abul-Haija Abdallah b. JTamdan and his brothers were released from confinement in the ( 56 ) Palace, and received robes of honour indicating that the Sultan was now reconciled. This year died 'Abbas b. 'Umar Ghanawi, minister of war and public security in Diyar Mmiar. He was replaced by Wasif Bektimuri. He proved incompe¬ tent and was replaced by Jinni Safwani, who proved highly competent. Year 306. In this year the vizier Abul-i/asan Ibn al-Furat was arrested, his second term of office having lasted a year, five months and nineteen days. Reason for his arrest. The ostensible cause for the dismissal of the vizier Ibn al-Furat on this second occasion was that he had delayed payment of the stipends due to the cavalry who were with the captains. 1 He alleged in excuse the finan¬ cial difficulty due to the expenditure on the campaign against Ibn Abi’l-Saj, and to the reduction in the revenue owing to the seizure by this rebel of the money due from Rayy. At the commencement of 306 the cavalry 1 Probably the reference is to the officers on duty at the palace, Second Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 61 mutinied, and went out to the Oratory. 1 Ibn al-Furat requested of Muqtadir an advance of 200,000 dinars from the Private Treasury to which he would add 200,000 himself to be expended on the cavalry. Muqtadir was incensed by this demand, and wrote to him reminding him that he (Ibn al-Furat) had undertaken to meet all public expenses as he had done in his first ministry, and in addition to pay a definite sum to the Caliph person¬ ally ; so he never imagined that Ibn al-Furat would make so audacious a demand. The vizier alleged the excuses which I have recorded, but they were not accepted. (57) When 'Abdallah b. Jubair had resided in Wasit during the ministry of 'Ali b. Tsa, he learned the amount of the revenue collected from its districts, and the surplus which remained with #amid b. 'Abbas after paying what he had guaranteed to the state ; 2 after he had returned to Baghdad and resumed his place as chairman of the Primary Committee in the Bureau of the Sawad, 3 he communicated this information to Ibn al-Furat, enumerating the various sources of this surplus. This impressed Ibn al-Furat; and after a time Ibn Jubair solicited the permission of Ibn al-Furat to write to H amid in reference to some of the facts which he had communicated concerning Hamid's guarantee; and leave was accorded, though hesitatingly. Ibn Jubair then wrote from his Committee (the Primary Committee in the Bureau of the Kharaj) to i^Tamid, who replied. Correspondence on the subject continued, and presently letters came from i^amid’s deputy Bishr b. 'Ali re¬ monstrating with Ibn Jubair for having discussed this 1 Le Strange, Baghdad, p. 204 : Outside the Baradan Gate stretched the Malikiyyah Cemetery ; it was also known as the Baradan Cemetery, and near this was the Chapel especially set apart for the prayers of the Festival at the close of the Ramadan Fast. 2 Compare above, p. 25. 3 This committee is mentioned by Hilal, see Glossary. Its duties were apparently to determine the taxation in gross. 62 A.H. 306. Caliphate of Muqtadir. matter in his committee. Hamid took alarm, fearing that the attitude assumed by Ibn Jubair was by arrange¬ ment with Ibn al-Furat, and with knowledge of the latter’s intentions. So he despatched an agent who should compass his being appointed vizier, and obtain the good offices of Nasr for that purpose. The agent intrigued for this object, dilated to Nasr on the high¬ mindedness of Hamid, and undertook to extort vast sums from Ibn al-Furat and his dependents. Hamid also sent messages of the same purport to the Queen- mother. His intrigues and his offers were helped by Nasr's distrust of Ibn al-Furat coupled with fear of him, and the financial stress which had compelled Ibn al-Furat to apply to the Caliph for the advance. 0 These various circumstances combined to bring about what i/amid designed. A message was sent to #amid bidding him quit Wasit and proceed to the metropolis, giving notice of his departure by carrier-pigeon. When Muqtadir received the news thus brought, he sent his freedman Shafi' and Nasr the Chamberlain to arrest Ibn al- Furat, his son Muhassin, Musa b. Khalaf, Tsa b. Jubair, 1 (58) Sa'id b. Ibrahim Tustari, and an umm wuld of the vizier with a son whom she had borne him. 2 They were all brought to the Palace, where Ibn al-Furat by himself was put in the custody of Zaidan the Stewardess, while the rest were put in charge of Nasr. #amid reached Baghdad, and remained for the night in the Chamberlain’s apartments in the Palace. There Abu’l-Qasim Ibn Al-#awari ingratiated himself with him. #amid sat talking, and displayed to the captains and all the courtiers of Muqtadir his irascibility and 1 Perhaps Abu ‘Isa. Hs is likely to be the same person as was mentioned above. 2 The woman’s name was Daulah and her son’s Hasan. The italicized words mean a slave-girl who has acquired rights resembling those of a free woman by maternity. 63 VlZIERATE OF #AMID B. 'ABBAS. ignorance of a vizier's duties. Muqtadir, being told of this, summoned Abu'l-Qasim Ibn al-Z/awari and remonstrated with him for nominating i/amid to the office ; Ibn al-Z/awari urged in reply Z/amid's vast wealth, his undertaking to extract fines, the respect felt for him by his officials, his personal character, and the number of his armed retainers. In the course of his conversation he suggested to Muqtadir to give 'Ali b. 'Isa his liberty, and make him president of all the bureaux, where he might act as Hamid’s deputy. Muqtadir declined to do this save at Z/amid's own request; so Ibn al-Z/awari had recourse to //amid, advising him to make this request of Muqtadir when he had his audience of the Caliph ; and set out before him the quantity of the business transacted in the bureaux, and the claims of the attendants, against whose roughness he warned him. He further let H amid see that, if he did not himself take this course, it would be done in spite of his opposition, and assured //amid that his advice was given in all sincerity. So when //amid had his audience of Muqtadir and was invested with the vizierate, after kissing the ground before the Caliph, he requested that 'Ali b. 'Isa be set at liberty, and that permission be accorded the vizier to appoint him as his deputy over the bureaux and the provinces. Muqtadir replied that he did not expect 'Ali b. 'Isa would assent to this proposal, or be satisfied with the second place after he had held the first, //amid answered before the company : Why should he not accept ? A state-secretary is like a tailor ; at one time he stitches a coat worth a thousand dinars, at another time ( 59 ) one that is worth ten dirhems ;—a sally which pro¬ voked mirth. When //amid had received his robe of honour as vizier, he proceeded to the vizier's palace in Mukharrim, where he took up his abode, and prepared to receive 64 A.H. 306. Caliphate of Muqtadir. visits of congratulation ; that day he settled nothing in the bureaux, which he left sealed. Abu Ali Ibn Muqlah endeavoured with success to ingratiate himse with the new vizier, who sent for Abu Abdallah Zanji the clerk, and made him reside in the vizier’s palace to conduct his correspondence with the provincial governors, as he had done for Ibn al-Furat. Ibn al-Hawari made himself familiar with all the business and became inter¬ mediary between Hamid and Muqtadir. Letters were written in the name of Muqtadir to all the provincial governors and ministers of public security announcing the elevation of Hamid to the vizierate, these being the composition of Abu’l-Hasan Mohammed b. Ja'far b. Thawabah. Hamid and ‘Ali b. ‘Isa then arranged the constitution of the bureaux by friendly agreement; after which the latter began to make such alterations as he thought fit. For two months from the commencement of the ministry of Hamid b. ‘Abbas ‘Ali b. ‘Isa used to come to Hamid’s house twice each day ; then once a week only ; then, at the commencement of 307, 1 Hamid lost credit with' Muqtadir, who came to the conclusion shared by the officers of his court that it was useless to rely on Hamid in any matter whatever. So Abu’l-Hasan ‘Ali b. ‘Isa monopolized the control of the empire, and ex¬ tinguished Hamid, who could give no orders on any sub¬ ject ; so there was a current rhyme Here is a vizier without a black robe And there a black robe without a vizier. When Hamid found himself deprived of control and that his functions were confined to wearing a black robe and riding to the Palace on reception days, and that when he presented himself Muqtadir allowed him no share in the administration, addressing his whole con¬ versation to ‘Ali b. ‘Isa, he bethought him of undertaking the business of the kharaj , the public, private and new 1 Began June 3, 919. VlZIERATE OF Z/AMID B. ‘ABBAS. 65 Estates, 1 and the estates originally belonging to the viziers Abbas ( 60 ) and Ibn al-Furat which had been confiscated, in the Sawad, Ahwaz and Ispahan. The matter was discussed by him with 'Ali b. Tsa in the presence of Muqtadir, and ultimately he undertook this business. He assigned the farming of Ispahan to Ahmad b. Mohammed b. Rustam for an annual increase of 100,000 dinars upon its produce under him and under Ibn Abi'l-Baghl and Ahmad b. Sayyah. When the concession given by //amid lapsed, 'Ali b. Tsa assigned it to Abu 'Ali Ibn Rustam for this increased sum. Pre- sently Abu’l-Z/usain Ibn Abi’l-Baghl exposed the oppres¬ sion to which Abu 'Ali Ibn Rustam was subjecting the people of Ispahan, and 'Ali b. Tsa on investigation found his statements to be correct. 'Ali b. Tsa on consultation with Ibn Abid-Baghl assigned the farming to two friends of the latter who had served under him when he was governor of Ispahan, named Abu Muslim Mohammed b. Bahr and Abu’l-Z/usain Ahmad b. Sa‘d. The sum which they were to supply was 80,000 additional in lieu of 100,000, the diminution being made for the purpose of giving'relief to the subjects, to whom Ibn Rustam was delivered. When //amid perceived how low he had sunk in the eyes of Muqtadir and that he had no say at all in the affairs of the empire, he asked permission to retire to Wasit and look after his original tax-farming operations. Permission being granted, he took up his abode in Wasit, retaining only the title of vizier. Account of the treatment by Hamid of Ibn al-Furat and his dependents. The third day of Z/amid's investiture he with 'Ali b. Tsa sailed to the Palace of Muqtadir, and when the 1 i.e., lands owned by the Moslem community : and by the Caliph in virtue of his office : these being all conquered territory. The " new ” were such as were acquired in some other way. 66 A.H. 306. Caliphate of Muqtadir. Caliph had given permission they presented themselves, //amid then requested leave to produce a certain soldier whom he had discovered before his appointment to office, and who had confessed to him that he was Ibn al-Furat s intermediary with the rebel Yusuf Ibn Abid-Saj, and handed him a letter to Ibn Abid-Saj purporting to be from Ibn al-Furat. This provoked the wrath of Muq¬ tadir against Ibn al-Furat, ( 61 ) and the Caliph, turning to the qadi Abu ‘Umar, asked him what he thought of this action of Ibn al-Furat. The qa^i replied that if Ibn al-Furat had really perpetrated such an act, he must have been bent on undermining the empire. The Caliph then turned to the qadi Abu Ja'far Ibn al- Bahlul, and asked him what he thought. He replied . My notion is that God has commanded us to be circum¬ spect and not to accept the word of an evil-doer. Ibn al-Bahlul then proceeded to cross-examine the informer in such a manner that his mendacity was apparent, and the man was made to confess that his claim was fictitious. He was handed over to the Chief of Police, who ordered him to be punished with a hundred lashes, after which he was imprisoned in the Dungeon, and pre¬ sently banished to Egypt. //amid and f Ali b. Tsa then produced Abu Ali Z/usain b. Ahmad Madara'i to be confronted with Ibn al-Furat in the Palace. This person declared in Ibn al-Furat’s presence that he had himself transmitted to Ibn al-Furat in his first vizierate 400,000 dinars as secret profits from the Syrian Armies, 1 and that Abu l- ' Abbas Ibn Bistam and his son Abu’l-Qasim after him had transmitted 800,000 dinars as commission and secret profit from the districts of Egypt ; at the rate of 200,000 dinars a year. The judges and clerks were present at the trial, and Muqtadir was seated where he could hear the proceedings without being seen. Ibn al-Furat’s method of rebutting the charge was the following : 1 Name for the province, VlZIERATE OF HAMID B. ‘ABBAS. 67 This official, he said, was in charge of Egypt and Syria during the vizierate of ‘Ali b. Tsa ; he has just confessed that these sums were such as it was his duty to levy, and he asserts that in his capacity of administrator of the Armies of Syria he transmitted some of them to me, and that the two sons of Bis^am transmitted to me the amount which he states. Now ‘Ali b. Tsa ( 62 ) was vizier during four years : either then similar sums were transmitted to ‘Ali b. Tsa, in which case he is liable for them ; or they were not transmitted, in which case Jiis official is himself liable for them. Then he acknowledges that in the time of my first vizierate he collected the sum which he names, viz. 400,000 dinars, and asserts that he transmitted it to me. He confesses then his own guilt while bringing a charge against me ; I declare that his charge against me is false, and every one knows the ruling of God, his Prophet and the Jurists in such cases. iTamid here gave vent to violent abuse and insulted Ibn al-Furat coarsely ; Ibn al-Furat told him that he was on the Sultan’s carpet and within the imperial Palace, not in the kind of place with which he was familiar, such as a barn to be divided, nor was he himself a farmer whom he might abuse or an agent whom he might cuff; then turning to Shafi‘ Lu’lu'i he requested him to write what he was about to say to their lord the Sultan : viz. that iTamid had only been induced to aspire to the vizierate for which he was unfit by the fact that he, Ibn al-Furat, had made him liable for more than a million dinars excess due upon the districts of Wasit which he farmed. I, he continued, strenuously de¬ manded this sum, and he supposed that by becoming vizier he would secure possession of this excess, and obtain fresh profits besides. He, being vizier of the Commander of the Faithful, ought now to abandon his farming of the districts of Wasit, so that it might be seen whether he was the loser or the gainer ; this should 68 A.H. 306. Caliphate of Muqtadir. now be administered by Abu’l-#asan ‘Ali b. ‘Isa, since no-one was in afiy doubt as to the distance between him and tfamid in technical knowledge of finance and economy. The fact that he while vizier retained the farming was a beginning of treachery and embezzlement. At this amid ordered that his beard should be plucked, and as no-one ventured to obey this order, he himself sprang on the ex-vizier and commenced pulling at his beard. The trial had reached a point at which Husain B. AtfMAD Madara'i was ready to sign his bond for half a million dinars if Ibn al-Furat were placed in his power. This was before Hamid's abuse of the ex-vizier and plucking at his beard. Now iTamid had summoned Abu ‘Ali Ibn Muqlah, and instructed him to confront Ibn al-Furat with the statement that he had recalled deposits to the value of ( 63 ) half a million dinars which he had concealed during his vizierate. 1 Abu ‘Ali how¬ ever declined to show his face to Ibn al-Furat, and when #amid sent to him during the trial, requesting him to perform his promise, and confront Ibn al-Furat, replied that he was willing to sign an affidavit to that effect, but declined to be confronted with Ibn al-Furat. This incensed #amid, who was alienated from Ibn Muqlah from that day. ‘Ali b. ‘Isa went no further than addressing some courteous observations to Ibn al-Furat at certain points of his defence, while #amid was engaged in abuse and insult; Ibn al-#awari pretended to Ibn al-Furat that he was acting as mediator between the latter and #amid, but his language showed that he was endeavouring to damage Ibn al-Furat. When Muqtadir heard the insults of i/amid and saw him stretch out his hand to the other's beard, he sent a servant to withdraw Ibn al-Furat from the court and take him back to his place of imprison- 1 i.e., concealed them when called upon to make a complete statement of )iis assets. 69 VlZIERATE OF #AMID B. 'ABBAS. ment. 'Ali b. 'Isa and Ibn al-Hawari both told Hamid that he had injured them by his treatment of Ibn al- Furat. .Husain b. Ahmad Madara'i after his exhibi¬ tion of hostility to Ibn al-Furat said to him : If the trial results in your being fined, I will contribute fifty thousand dinars. When he left the court Nasr the Chamberlain, ‘Ali b. 'Isa and Ibn al-Hawari said to him : You came here to cross-examine the man, and before you have finished you take to bribing him and currying favour with him. He replied : The man whom you brought me to see was one of whom, as soon as I came before him, one of you said to me : Consider whom you will be addressing ! Another said : Mind what you are about ! A third : Remember that your life is at stake ! So after hearing his pleading I thought the course which I took the wisest. Among the noble acts done by Ibn al-Furat was the following : when at a late date he became vizier for the third time, he had to arrest the eldest son of Husain b. AAmad Madara'i, and obtain his bond for 25,000 dinars due from him to the Sultan's treasury. Ibn al-Furat did not demand the money of him, but kept him in arrest until ( 64 ) his father returned from Syria; he then re¬ minded the father of the 50,000 dinars which he had offered to advance on his behalf, and said to him : You made a promise on that occasion and it was left to your choice whether to carry it out or not; here is a bond in the hand of your son for 25,000 dinars, which he actually received and which he is bound to pay. Neither he nor you have any claim to them. And here I return you the bond to recompense you for your offer on that occasion. Abu Ahmad Ibn .Hammad also was summoned to cross-examine Ibn al-Furat in the presence of Shall' Lu'lu'i. He commenced his address by saying to Ibn al-Furat : The vizier and the President both warn you 70 A.H. 306. Caliphate of Muqtadir. to be faithful to your own interests. From your estates and crops you have had a yearly income of twelve hundred thousand dinars, and a similar sum from secret profits. This is an enormous sum, so give your bond for a million dinars to be paid at once and before your case is considered, so that your life may be safe ; other¬ wise you will be delivered over to those who will treat you as those traitors should be treated who conspire against the empire. For the Sultan has ascertained that you have been in correspondence with Ibn Abi'l- Saj, urging him to rebel.—Ibn al-Furat replied : You should have enough to do in looking after your own self and your own dangers without carrying such messages. You were in the employ of ‘Ali b. Tsa for four years during which time you embezzled a vast amount of property. When I undertook the administration, you went into hiding, and the person who replaced you wrote to me to notify various misstatements in your accounts and secret profits which you had enjoyed. These letters are still preserved in the imperial archives.—Shafi‘ then turned to Ibn #ammad and said to him : You are no match for Ibn al-Furat, so go to his son MuAassin and cross-examine him. So he rose and obtained MuAassin's bond for 300,000 dinars. Then he cross-examined Musa b. Khalaf, asking him about Ibn al-Furat's deposits and wealth. Musa replied ( 65 ) that he had no deposit entrusted to him by Ibn al-Furat, that he knew nothing about his deposits, that no money of the ex-vizier's had ever passed through his hands, and that he had not held any government appointment under him ; he had only looked after his household expenses. This Musa b. Khalaf was nearly ninety years old, and in addition afflicted with an in¬ curable complaint; he could not have survived torture, so Ibn tfammad merely abused him. After this Ibn ffammad continued to cross-examine one after another of, the friends of Ibn al-Furat, but no money was produced. VlZIERATE OF HAMID B. 'ABBAS. 71 He had MuAassin suspended by one arm from a curtain rope, but got nothing from him either. When he saw this, he begged to be excused from dealing with the rest and was allowed to cease. Then Hamid summoned Musa b. Khalaf and commanded him to reveal the treasures of Ibn al-Furat ; for, he said, you know where they are ; do not compel us to resort to torture which will be fatal to you. The man replied that he was ready to take any oath that he knew nothing about the ex-vizier’s deposits. Hamid thereupon ordered him to be cuffed, and this process was continued until ‘Ali b. Tsa interceded for him and the slaves were told to stop. Hamid however repeated the torture various times, and finally one night summoned him and had him beaten in his presence until he died of the strokes. He was told that the man was dead, but ordered the slaves to go on beating and seventeen blows were inflicted on the corpse. When Hamid was convinced that Musa b. Khalaf was dead, he ordered him to be dragged out by the foot ; this was done, and the ear of the corpse caught in the hinge of the door and was wrenched off. He was carried to his house dead. The fidelity of Musa b. Khalaf won great admiration ; for he knew of various treasures deposited by his master with different people and let himself be killed rather than divulge them. Hamid then summoned MuAassin, and demanded money of him ; but MuAassin replied that he could not furnish more than 20,000 dinars. Hamid ordered him to be cuffed, and after some blows observed that he had thick hair on his head ; so, thinking that this deadened the pain of the blows, he ordered a barber to be fetched ; he was removed from his presence, to have his hair shaved ; he was then brought back, and cuffed in the presence of a multitude until he nearly died of the blows. ‘Ali b. Tsa interceded requesting that the vizier should reduce his demand to fifty thousand dinars. Hamid however swore that he would be satisfied with no less 72 A.H. 306. Caliphate of Muqtadir. than seventy thousand. MuAassin then gave his bond for that amount; * but //amid had him clothed in a woollen jubbah ( 66 ) and after inflicting on him various torments delivered him to Abu'l-//asan Thu'bani. MuAassin paid sixty thousand after soliciting people's aid, and being assisted by ‘Ali b. ‘Isa with ten thousand dirhems. He had to solicit help for some time before he produced the sum for which he had given his bond, but many people interceded for him and ultimately //amid permitted him to return home. //amid was very anxious that Ibn al-Furat should be delivered into his hands ; Muqtadir was willing to do this, only he said that he must put him in the charge of a servant who would see that his life was preserved, //amid observed that if Ibn al-Furat was sure that he would be saved from torture, he would hold out. Muq¬ tadir then offered to deliver him into the hands of ‘Ali b. ‘Isa or Shah' Lu'lu'i, in whom he had confidence. Muqtadir deliberated much about Ibn al-Furat, at times craving after the money, at others disliking the thought of his dying in H amid's hands. Zaidan the Stewardess, having ascertained this state of Muqtadir's mind, told Ibn al-Furat, who professed to have seen his brother Abu'l-‘Abbas in a dream. His brother, he asserted, had charged him to pay the money, as the people did not want his life, and only wanted his wealth.—I replied, he said, that I had already paid away all I possessed.— His brother rejoined : You have not paid away a certain sum.—Most of that, was the surrejoinder, belongs to your heirs.—Pay it away, replied his brother ; we got it together from their ancestors and have only hoarded it for such an emergency as this.—He then wrote to two traders, bidding them transmit the sums in their hands, viz. 700,000 dinars, to the Palace of Muqtadir ; to Abu Bakr Ibn Qarabah to deliver another sum, and to Ibn Idris the Carrier to deliver another. Muqtadir sent these notes to //amid and ‘Ali b. ‘Isa, who were VlZIERATE OF #AMID B. 'ABBAS. 73 annoyed and despaired of obtaining possession of Ibn al-Furat’s person. ‘Ali b. 'Isa and Ibn al-#awari asked #amid what he thought of Ibn al-Furat’s action. He replied that it was like the Caliph’s luck. 'Ali b. 'Isa replied : Doubtless the vizier is right, only I am sure that Ibn (67) al-Furat would not have taken this step unless he had first had his life guaranteed him ; nor would he have parted with this immense sum for nothing and without some deep design. Part of the sum would have sufficed him, were it not that he means to get our lives and fortunes in his power. #amid and Ibn al-#awari both agreed that this must be so. i/amid and 'Ali b. 'Isa then went about summoning the drawees, to whom they presented the bills of Ibn al-Furat. Their correctness was admitted by all save Ibn Qarabah, who admitted that the ex-vizier had deposited with him 10,000 dinars, but at the beginning of the year 306 had purchased of him a quantity of ambergris and musk, most of which he had presented to Muqtadir, keeping only a little for himself. He pro¬ duced orders signed by Ibn al-Furat with the proper dates, and requested to be confronted with Ibn al-Furat. He was despatched by H amid to the Palace, where he was introduced by Mufli& into Ibn al-Furat’s presence. When he told his story, the ex-vizier admitted its truth, and begged the pardon of Ibn Qarabah for what he had written ; asserting that the transaction had escaped his memory, whereas he well knew that he had set the per¬ fumes against the deposit. Ibn al-Furat gave a written statement that Ibn Qarabah’s account of the matter was correct; and so Ibn al-Furat’s money was secured to him. This act of Ibn Qarabah was one of the strongest reasons for his intimate association afterwards with the ex-vizier. Another sum had been deposited by Ibn al-Furat with the qa^i Abu 'Umar on account of his son #asan 74 A.H. 306. Caliphate of Muqtadir. b. Daulah (umm wuld of Ibn al-Furat). Abu 'Umar was greatly alarmed when he saw Hamid dealing ruth¬ lessly with judges and witnesses ; so when asked by Hamid whether he had any deposit belonging to Ibn al- Furat, he admitted that he had ; he was ordered to produce the money, which he did, paying it over. Ibn al-Furat hearing of this was offended with Abu 'Umar. There is a story that Abu Bakr Ibn Qarabah narrated as follows : When Ibn al-Furat received his robe of honour for his third vizierate, I was the first person who met him in the vestibule of the chamberlain’s apart¬ ments, which abuts on the door of the private apartments. Abu Bakr, he said, did Abu 'Umar save himself with my deposit and expose me to vengeance ? I replied : The vizier, God help him, ( 68 ) says truly ; who told him ? Ibn al-Furat pointed in the direction of Zaidan the Stewardess. The qa^i Abu 'Umar got to know of the resentment harboured against him by Ibn al-Furat, and when the latter reached his palace at the time of the latter evening prayer, he found Abu 'Umar and his son sitting in a mosque that was by the entrance. The vizier was surprised at this, dismounted and approached them. They adjured him to go into his house, whither they entered with him ; they then said : We know all about the sitting, 1 and what do you design ?—He said : That you should neither excuse yourselves nor argue, but refund the money.—They agreed, the amount being three thousand dinars ; only they asked for easy terms that they might not be hurried. Next morning Ibn al-Furat received a visit from Ibn Qarabah, who told him that he had been visited by Abu 'Umar and his son, who were in a state of alarm, and had informed him that the money was intact. Two days later Abu Bakr brought the three thousand dinars in the very jar which had held the original deposit. When Ibn al-Furat saw it he was surprised and ordered it to be taken in. 1 Probably the interview between Ibn al-Furat and Ibn Qarabah. VlZIERATE OF Z/AMID B. 'ABBAS. 75 We now return to the story of //amid and his vizierate.—When Z/amid and ‘Ali b. Tsa perceived the power which Ibn al-Z/awari had acquired over Muqtadir, an order was issued by i/amid in the writing of ‘Ali b. ‘Isa, giving Ibn al-Z/awari control of the whole pay department of the troops in all the Western pro¬ vinces, from Hit to the furthest extremity of Egypt. His stipend was fixed at the same amount as had been received by all the persons who had discharged these duties in the last days of Ibn al-Furat’s second vizierate. His son, who was then about ten years of age, was also to have a public appointment with a stipend of 150 dinars per month. He did in fact appoint this son primary 1 head of the pay-office in the metropolis, at a stipend of 180 dinars per month, nominating as his deputy a man called Qatirmiz the Clerk. After this the association of Ibn al-Z/awari with i/amid became yet closer, and his private attendance on //amid yet more frequent, H amid consulting him about all his affairs ; and yet other offices were conferred by the latter on the former, with stipends attached, the duties being performed by deputies. He thus amassed enormous wealth, but did not himself take any active part in affairs, or know (69) what was going on in his depart¬ ments. He further dismissed Nizar from the headship of police in Baghdad, and replaced him by Nujh T uluni, who employed a deputy ; and established jurists in each Quarter, whose interpretation of the law was to be followed by the police magistrates in the punishment of criminals. This weakened the authority of the police, and Nuj/? was little feared by the thieves and highway¬ men, whence crime and rioting became frequent, and robbery reached alarming proportions ; the highway¬ men had a rhyme— Go out and don’t be timid So long as NujA is chief ! 1 This probably is in antithesis to the deputy. 76 A.H. 307. Caliphate of Muqtadir. Year 307. The object of Hamid in the revenue-farming of the provinces which have been mentioned was this : 'Ali b. Tsa having monopolized the administration of imperial affairs, and extinguished Hamid, Hamid undertook these provinces in order to have some say in some matters in the metropolis, and exhibit on these undertakings a sufficient surplus to eclipse the reputation which 'Ali b. Tsa had acquired with Muqtadir for competence and honesty. He did not include the districts of Fars in the territory which he farmed, because it was farmed by Abu'l-Qasim Ibn Bistam, and he was advised by Nu'man 1 not to undertake revenue-farming at all, as he held that it would lessen his dignity in men's eyes, and enable 'Ali b. Tsa to address demands for money to him, and get power over him. Abu Tsa brother of Abu Sakhrah on the other hand encouraged him to undertake the revenue-farming, in order to make his (70) mark ; and to contract according to the assessments of the years when 'Ali b. Tsa had been vizier, in order that the sums which he produced, being vast, should count as corrections to ‘Ali b. 'Isa's estimates. Hamid inclined to this latter counsel, and thus addressed 'Ali b. Tsa in the presence of Muqtadir : You have monopolized the administration of affairs so as to exclude me, and do not see fit to ask my advice on any step that you take. The truth however must be told to the Commander of the Faithful; you have wasted in the Sawad, Ahwaz, and Ispahan 400,000 dinars, each year. I am prepared to farm the revenue of these provinces for four years on the assessment of sums to be transmitted to the metro¬ polis and sums to be assigned to specified objects which was authorized in the years of your vizierate, and add 400,000 dinars to the sum every year.—'Ali b. Tsa replied that he could not approve of Hamid farming the revenue 1 Ibn Abdallah Mundhiri, who had retired from office and was a friend of this vizier. VlZIERATE OF H AMID B. ‘ABBAS. 77 of these provinces, because he was well known to be in the habit of grinding down the inhabitants, introducing new customs, and anticipating the collection of the revenue. A person who acted on these principles might doubtless obtain a surplus for a year or two, but would introduce ruin which it might take many years to re¬ cover. Meanwhile he would dry up the source of revenue and leave a bad name. After a long debate between the two Muqtadir observed: This is a proposal on Hamid's part to increase the revenue, and it may not be rejected : if you are prepared to farm these provinces on the terms offered by #amid, I will let you have them. —‘Ali b. Tsa replied : I am a clerk, not a revenue officer ; #amid is much better suited to be revenue-farmer of those provinces, especially as he has offered these terms willingly. And his being able to do so, O Commander of the Faithful, is due to my having rendered these territories prosperous by my tenderness with the in¬ habitants and my having appointed such revenue officials as have relieved them of undue burdens. The culti¬ vation for year 307 is now at an end, and he cannot profess to be undertaking the revenue-farming in order to increase the cultivation of the soil; the time for that has ended long ago.—Muqtadir thereupon ordered the right to farm this revenue to be assigned to H amid, and took his bond for the sum mentioned ; and the two left the Palace. ‘Ali b. Tsa ordered the heads of the bureaux to issue the assessments from their offices in accordance with the assessments made in recent years, since these had been more productive ; so the assessment of moneys trans¬ mitted and moneys specially assigned and moneys allotted to permanent expenses in the districts of the Sawad and Ahwaz, was issued for one of the three years ( 71 ) 303-305, at 33,000,000 dirhems ; that of the Estates, private, new, confiscated from ‘Abbas and confiscated 78 A.H. 307. Caliphate of Muqtadir. from Ibn al-Furat, consisting of moneys to be trans¬ mitted and moneys specially assigned, at 8,800,000 dirhems ; and the assessment of the revenue of Ispahan with moneys allotted to permanent expenses, being one year’s share out of three, at 6,300,000 dirhems. Total : 48,100,000 dirhems. The extra amount promised by Hamid, 400,000 dinars, was valued at 5,800,000 dirhems. The whole sum then came to : 53,900,000 dirhems. Hamid b.‘Abbas requested Muqtadir to order a number of clerks to be placed at his disposal, whom he might employ in the clerical work of the office of his revenue¬ farming. He specially nominated ‘Ub aid allah b. Mohammed Kalwadhi and A#mad b. Zuraiq with others. This request was granted after ‘Ali b. Tsa had made out the contract for him in the name of his friend Mohammed b. Mansur, and obtained the signature of Hamid to an undertaking to render himself responsible for the contract made out in the name of this person. Hamid b. ‘Abbas placed reliance on ‘Ubaidallah b. Mohammed Kalwadhi, who used to revise the documents presented by Hamid’s clerks, and interviewed persons on trial in the Palace as Hamid’s agent, where he con¬ ducted his cross-examination with civility and went no further than argument. ‘Ali b. ‘Isa relied on Saqr b. Mohammed in cross-questioning the clerks in Hamid’s employ ; when Hamid was present he did little more than shower abuse on ‘Ali b. Tsa, reviling both himself and his ancestors. His conduct on these occasions disgraced the empire, and became the talk of nobles and commons. Presently Muqtadir reconciled the two at an audience. Ali b. Isa insisted on Hamid’s transmitting the money for which he had rendered himself responsible, and the latter had to request permission to take a jour¬ ney to Ahwaz. This was granted ; but as Abu’l-Qasim (72) Kalwadhi told him that he (Kalwadhi) was not VlZIERATE OF HAMID B. 'ABBAS. 79 strong enough to resist 'Ali b. 'Isa during Hamid’s absence, Hamid appointed his son-in-law Abu'l-Husain Mohammed b. Ahmad b. Bistam, to represent him in the Palace when there was cross-questioning and to strengthen the hands of Kalwadhi and enable him. to enforce his pleading. Kalwadhi displayed during this period great technical knowledge, competence and correctness in detail, which led more than anything to his advancement. There was much dissension between the clerks of Hamid and those of 'Ali b. Tsa ; it would be too long a task to record it all. i/amid agreed to the arbitration of Nu'man, who accepted the proposal that he should act, and fixed the whole amount involved in all the dis¬ cussions at 100,000 dinars upon the share of a single year. 1 Ibn Bis^am and Kalwadhi wrote to Hamid who was in Ahwaz to inform him of the sum which had been fixed by arbitration ; whereupon Hamid adopted a line worthy of a master of the craft. He wrote a letter to' Muqtadir, which he despatched by a slave, and which Nasr delivered sealed to the Caliph, who found therein the statement that Hamid had not undertaken this revenue-farming for the sake of personal gain or to make a profit out of the Sultan, but only to exhibit his skill in management of such affairs, and his strict economy, while he also exposed the evil results of the operations of 'Ali b. 'Isa both of old and recently. After having offered an excess of 400,000 dinars yearly, he, when he had come to Ahwaz, had seen the way to add a further 200,000 dinars for the year 7 ; this sum he had realized and had written the present letter with his own hand that it might be used as evidence against him of his having undertaken to increase by that sum his original addition, and that it might be registered in the archives. 1 This seems to mean that the amount claimed by ‘Ali b. Tsa from Hamid for kharaj differed in a number of details from that which the latter was trans¬ mitting ; and that the arbitrator fixed the total of these claims at the sum men¬ tioned in the text. 80 A.H. 307. Caliphate of Muqtadir. This delighted Muqtadir, who commanded that the hands of //amid should be strengthened, and that 'Ali b. Tsa should restrict himself to looking after the needs of the officers of the court, and watching what was expended under various heads, as he understood this better than i/amid ; while i/amid was to monopolize the collection of the revenue and the administration of provinces.—'Ali b. Tsa was afraid lest the hands of //amid should be strengthened to such an extent that he himself would be delivered into them. It happened after this that first the common people and then the court became agitated in consequence of the rise in prices, and a series of riots (73) occurred in the course of which the empire came near disintegration and Baghdad being devastated. The clerks and depen¬ dents of //amid and his partisans charged 'Ali b. Tsa with encouraging the populace and most of the court to riot, as prices had not risen to an extent which would account for such outrages ; the highest price for wheaten bread being a dirhem for eight rails. Account of the causes which brought such disorder into the affairs of Hamid b. ( Abbas that his contract for farming the revenue was cancelled. There was a public gathering attended by some leading commoners, at which complaints were made of the rise in prices ; 'Ali b. Tsa was hooted when he rode in the streets, and presently the mob plundered the shops of a number of cornchandlers in Baghdad. They then assembled at the gate of the Palace, and made an uproar. Muqtadir ordered Ibn al-Z/awari to write to //amid bidding him hasten to the capital and attend to the prices, and put a stop to the practice of delaying the sale of the crops, so that prices might fall. This letter was despatched, and //amid started from Ahwaz ; Muq¬ tadir further sent Mahir the eunuch to hurry him \ the VlZIERATE OF HAMID B. ‘ABBAS. 81 heads of the bureaux and military commanders left the city to meet him, and the same was done by Nasr, Ibn al-Hawari, and 'Ali b. 'Isa. He was received by Muq- tadir, who addressed him civilly and expressed his commendation for the economy which he had effected, and ordered a robe of honour to be put upon him. When this was done he was mounted upon a shihri 1 and departed for his residence. The day after there was an excitement among the troops in the Palace, and they clamoured at the rise in prices ; the populace too rioted in the public mosques of Baghdad, broke the pulpits, stopped public worship after the first '' inclination/’ stripped people of their clothes, and flung brickbats about. Many persons were wounded. A great crowd collected in the public mosque of the Palace, and attacked Nasr the Chamberlain, whom they pelted with brickbats. They marched the same day to the house of if amid b. 'Abbas, who sent out against them his retainers, who attacked them with missiles of clay and with arrows ; many of the mob were killed, and were carried away on biers ; the mob violently abused Hamid's retainers, some of whom he sent (74) with Dewadadh b. Mohammed, brother’s son to Yusuf Ibn Abi’l-Saj, to enter the Public mosque on the Western bank, which they did on horseback. There they killed a number of people, some of the soldiers also being killed. The people spent the Friday night in great alarm for their lives, their property, and their families ; and the chief of police was unable to resist the rioters owing to the number that were gathered together. On Saturday morning a number of people belonging to the mob went and set fire to the bridges, opened the prisons and plundered the houses of the chief of police and other persons. Muqtadir sent a number of the H ujari 1 A horse used on state occasions, Tabari iii, 586 gives the price of one as 4,000 dirhems. 82 A.H. 307. Caliphate of Muqtadir. retainers in boats to attack the mob, and Harun, son of Gharib “ the uncle/' 1 rode with a great host to the Taq Gate, where he set fire to various places. The mob fled before him to the public mosque at the T aq Gate ; Harun stationed a guard at the door of the mosque, and arrested all whom he found inside it, making no distinction between devotee and highwayman. He had them all conveyed to the police court, where some were scourged, others caned, and the hands of certain notorious malefactors were cut off. Then on the Sunday Ya'nis Muwaffaqi rode about the city and endeavoured to quiet the people, and made a proclamation which appeased the rioters. Presently //amid sailed in his launch meaning to visit the Sultan, but he was pelted by the mob with brickbats, so that Muqtadir ordered Shaft' his freedman to ride and pacify the mob. He did so, proceeding on the Western bank, where the rioting was going on ; after pacifying the people, he arrested a number of the mob, scourged some and amputated the hands of certain who were known to have used brick¬ bats. Meanwhile there was an outcry raised by the Regular Infantry in the Palace at the rise in prices, so Muqtadir ordered the shops and the storehouses belonging to //amid, the Queen-mother, the royal princes and the chief officers of the empire to be opened and the wheat to be sold at a reduction of five dinars on the kuyy, and barley at a proportionate reduction ; and orders were issued to the merchants and retailers to sell at the same figure. Then Harun b. Gharib rode out accompanied by Ibrahim B ; -Batha (75) the Censor, and grain was priced at fifty dinars the kuyy of average size ; orders to that effect were issued to the dealers. The mob was satisfied and became quiet, and the price fell. A rescript was then issued by Muqtadir cancelling the contract of //amid b. 'Abbas owing to the riots and 1 Mother’s brother of Muqtadir, VlZIERATE OF H AMID B. ‘ABBAS. 83 the clamour of the mob over the rise in prices ; a further rescript charged ‘Ali b. ‘Isa himself to administer the finance of the Sawad, Ahwaz and Ispahan, where he was to appoint his own agents. He was also com¬ manded to write a letter to the people in the Caliph’s name, to be read in the bazaars and highways, and from the pulpits, declaring the contract of #amid for the farming of these revenues void, and forbidding all ministers of state, captains and retainers to undertake the farming of any of the provinces. #amid also wrote dismissing his agents, and bidding them hand over their functions to those of ‘Ali b. ‘Isa. #amid was greatly chagrined by this. Year 308. In this year news came from*Egypt of the movement of the Fadmid ruler of the Maghrib in its direction ; Mu’nis the Eunuch was despatched thither in conse¬ quence. • In this year a robe of honour was bestowed on Abu’l- Haija ‘Abdallah b. #amdan, who was put in charge of the Khorasan and Dinawar Road. Robes were also bestowed on his brothers Abul’-'Ala and Abu’l-Saraya. There also arrived a messenger from the brother of Su'luk 1 bringing money and gifts, and this messenger received a robe of honour. Year 309. In this year despatches were received and read from the pulpits announcing the rout of the Maghribi and the pillaging (76) of his camp. Mu’nis the same year re¬ ceived the title Muzaffar (the Victorious), letters being sent in Muqtadir’s name to the provinces to announce this. He was also given the government of Egypt and Syria. 1 His seizure of Rayy and subsequent legitimation as its governor were recorded in the year 304, 84 A.H. 309. Caliphate of Muqtadir. In the same year there entered Baghdad the envoy of the Ruler of Khorasan bringing the head of Laila b. Nu'MANthe Dailemite, who had rebelled in Tabaristan. 1 In it too i^ALLAj (whose name was #usain B. Mansur) became notorious and was ultimately executed and burned. Account of Husain b. Mansur Hallaj, and his final execution with mutilation. #amid b. 'Abbas during his vizierate was informed that this person had been duping a number of the court attendants and door-keepers with various retainers and dependents of Nasr, the Chamberlain, pretending that he raised the dead and was served by jinn, who brought him whatever he desired, and that he could perform any miracle that he wished of the sort ascribed to the Pro¬ phets. Some persons averred that Nasr was disposed to favour his claims. One Samarri, certain clerks, and a member of the Hashimite family, 2 were charged with acting as #allaj's prophets, declaring that #allaj was God (Oh, what blasphemy !). They were arrested and cross-questioned by #amid, and they confessed that they were his missionaries, being fully convinced that he was a god, who raised the dead. They made these assertions in the presence of i^allaj, who repudiated them and declared that they lied ; God forbid, he said, that I should pretend to divinity or prophecy ! I am merely a man who worships God and practises prayer, fasting and good works—nothing more ! #amid summoned the qa^i Abu 'Umar, the qadi Abu Ja'far Ibn al-Bahlul, and a number of eminent jurists and witnesses, and asked their opinion on the case. They stated that they would on no account sanction his execution until they 1 See Browne’s History of Tabaristan, 303-307. In the year 315 below this personage is said to have been the first Dailemite who got possession of Rayy after the departure of Ibn Abi’l-Saj. 2 i.e., the clan to which both the Prophet and ‘Ali belonged. VlZIERATE OF i?AMID B. 'ABBAS. 85 were convinced that he had done what deserved that penalty ; and that they could not accept the evidence of the persons who had made such charges against him without proof and admission on his part. (77) The first person who revealed the secrets of flallaj was a man of Basrah who made a clear statement of the case. He was, he said, acquainted with his adherents, who were scattered about the countries acting as his missionaries. He himself was one of those who had accepted his claims, then discovered his fraud and in consequence parted from him and quitted his society ; he was now hoping to win the favour of Almighty God by exposing him. This person found a supporter in Abu 'Ali Harun b. 'Abd al-‘Aziz the Book-keeper, a clerk from Anbar, who had written a book exposing the tricks and deceits of i/allaj, which is still in people's hands. i/allaj was at this time lodged in the Palace where he was well treated, and allowed to receive visitors, being in charge of Nasr the Chamberlain. i/allaj had two names, Husain b. Mansur and Mohammed b. Ahmad Farisi. He had duped Nasr who had been deceived by his frauds, and had won a great name among the court attendants. Muqtadir sent him to 'Ali b. Tsa, to be examined by him ; he was introduced into his saloon, and used rough language to him. There is a story that when 'Ali b. Tsa advanced towards him, i/allaj said to him privately : Stop where you are and advance no nearer, else I will overturn the earth upon you—with matter of this style. 'Ali b. Tsa shrank from examining him, and begged to be excused. So he was taken to i/amid b. 'Abbas. The daughter of Samarri, i/allaj's adherent, had been admitted to i/allaj and remained with him in the Palace for a time ; she was sent to //amid in order that he might question her about what she knew of the affairs of i/allaj or had herself witnessed. Abu'l-Qasim Zanji 86 A.H. 309. Caliphate of Muqtadir. states that he was present when this woman was brought before //amid b. 'Abbas, and that her examination was also attended by Abu ‘Ali A#mad b. Nasr Baziyar on behalf of Abu’l-Qasim Ibn al-#awari, for the purpose of hearing her statements. #amid asked her what she knew about #allaj ; and she narrated how her father Samarri had brought her to him, and how on this occasion he had given her presents of different sorts which she enumerated (she was, said Abu'l-Qasim Zanji, (78) a woman who expressed herself well, had an agreeable utterance, and made a favourable impression). Among the things which she recounted was that ifallaj said to her : I marry you to my son Sulaiman, the dearest to me of my children, who is resident in Nisabur. Now a man and his wife are likely to “ have words ” or she may disapprove of something which he has done. You are going to him, and I have commended you to him ; if he does anything which you dislike, fast the whole day, and at the end of the daytime mount the roof, stand upon ashes and coarse salt, and take your breakfast on them ; then turn your face in my direction and inform me of what you disapprove in his conduct; for I will hear and see.—Now one morning I was descending from the roof into the house accompanied by his daughter : he too had come down, and when we had got to the stair where he could see us and we him, his daughter said to me : Prostrate yourself to him ! I said to her : Ought one then to .prostrate oneself to any but God ?—Now he heard what I said to her and said : Yes, there is a God in heaven and also a god on earth.—Then he called me to him, and introduced his hand into his sleeve, and brought it out filled with musk, which he gave me ; this he did again and then several times more, and then said : Put this with your perfumes ; for a woman has need of per¬ fume when she presents herself before her husband.— Then he called me once when he was in a room, seated VlZIERATE OF HAMID B. ‘ABBAS. 87 on some matting, 1 and told me to lift the side of the mat in a certain place and take what I wanted from under¬ neath, pointing to the corner of the room. So I went thither and when I raised the mat I found a flooring of dinars over the whole room, a thing that amazed me.— The woman was then told to rise and was kept in the house of #amid until the execution of i^allaj. i^amid exerted himself to find the adherents of #allaj and set spies to hunt them down ; he succeeded (79) in arresting ZZaidarah, Samarri, Mohammed b. Ali Qunna’i, and the person known as Abu’l-Mughith Hashimi. Ibn Hammad went into concealment and his house was entered, and many documents taken thence ; many too were taken from the house of Mohammed b. 'Ali Qunna’i; they were written on Chinese paper, some of them in gold paint; the paper was lined with satin or silk, and they were bound in leather of good quality. Among the names of his adherents were found those of Ibn Bishr and Shakir. Tilamid asked the adherents whom he had arrested about these two, and they stated that they were a couple of his missionaries in Khorasan. So (said AbuT-Qasim Ibn Zanji) we wrote more than twenty letters ordering them to be despatched to the metropolis, most of which remained unanswered, whereas in such answers as came it was stated that they were being sought and when found would be despatched. Up to the present date (he adds) they have not been sent. Among the documents discovered in his possession were wonderful sets of letters from agents despatched by him to the provinces and instructions issued by him concerning the doctrines which they should propagate, and how they should lead the people from one state to another and from one stage to another till they reached the final goal : 2 and how they should address each class 1 In the Table-Talk something of the same sort is done in the mosque of Basrah. . . ..... * Maqrizi ascribes this method to the Isma'ilis ; see his Khna*. 88 A.H. 309. Caliphate of Muqtadir. according to the level of their intelligence, and the degree to which they showed themselves amenable. There were also replies from him to correspondents in enigmatic phraseology only intelligible to the writer and to the recipient of the communication. Abu’l-Qasim Ibn Zanji continues : One day my father and I had been in the presence of //amid, when he left the room, and we went out to the public saloon, and sat down in its peristyle. Presently Harun b. ‘Imran, the Collector, presented himself before my father and was talking with him when there appeared the slave of // ami d who was in charge of Hallaj, and signalled to Harun b. ‘Imran to come out to him. ( 80 ) He rose hastily, without our knowing the reason, and after a short absence returned, looking very pale. My father was alarmed by his appearance and asked him what had happened. He replied as follows :—I was summoned, he said, by the slave in charge of Hallaj, and when I went out to him he told me that he had been taking in to Z/allaj the tray which it was his daily custom to bring him, when he found that Hallaj was filling the room with his person, stretching from roof to floor and from side to side, so that there was no space left; this spectacle frightened him so much that he dropped the tray and fled. He added that the slave was in a fever, shaking and trembling . 1 _ While we were marvelling at the tale, a messenger came to us from Hamid, permitting us to enter his apartment. We entered and began to talk about the slave. Hamid summoned him, and he proved to be really feverish \ being asked by his master what had occurred he told the same story as he had told us. Hamid told him that he was lying, and abused him, saying : You were frightened by Hallaj’s conjuring-tricks (or something of the sort) plague on you, get out !-The slave departed, but • remained in his feverish condition for a long time. 1 In the autobiography of the medium D. D. Home there tion, but not on Hallaj’s scale. are cases of elonga- VlZIERATE OF #AMID B. 'ABBAS. 89 Presently Uamid found a letter by Ha\\a] containing the following : If a man desire to go on pilgrimage, but be unable to do so, he should set apart in his house a square building which should be touched by no unclean thing, and to which no-one should have access. When the days of the pilgrimage arrive, he should make the circuit round it, and perform the same ceremonies as he would perform in Meccah. Then he should collect thirty orphans and pre¬ pare for them the daintiest food that he can provide, after which he should bring them to the house and set that food before them ; after serving them himself and washing their hands, he should present each of them with a shirt, and hand to each of them seven dirhems (Abu'l-Qasim Ibn Zanji was not sure whether it was this or three) ; this would serve instead of the pilgrimage. My father, he continued, was reading this letter, and when he had finished this section, the qa^i Abu 'Umar turning to tfallaj asked him the source of this doctrine. iJallaj replied : The Book of Devotion by Ha san Basri. Abu 'Umar retorted : That is false ; Outlaw, we heard the book of Devotion by JTasan Basri in Meccah, and it contained none of these statements. Each time Abu 'Umar used the phrase Outlaw, Hamid ( 81 ) bade him commit his statement to writing. Abu 'Umar tried to attend to #allaj, but Hamid would not let him do so, and insisted, in such a way as to prevent opposition, that he should write down that #allaj was outlawed; and the other persons present at the trial followed suit. When i/allaj perceived how things were going he cried out : My person is sacrosanct and my blood may not be shed ; you have no right to outlaw me by a quibble. My religion is Islam and my sect the Sunnah ; there are books of mine at the booksellers in defence of the sunnah. I adjure you by God not to shed my blood.—He kept on repeating this while the assessors were writing their names, and when the signatures of those present were all on the paper, H amid forwarded it to Muqtadir. 90 A.H. 309. Caliphate of Muqtadir. The imperial rescript was as follows : Inasmuch as the sentence of the judge is what you have presented to us, have him taken to the police court, and scourged with a thousand stripes , if he is not dead at the end, then order his hands and feet to be amputated, decapi- tate him, place his head on a pole and burn his body.— Hamid summoned the Chief of police, bade him read the rescript, and ordered him to take away Hallaj and carry out the orders. This the Chief of police declined to do, alleging that he was afraid the culprit would be forcibly rescued. So it was agreed that the Chief of police should come after dark with a number of his slaves and men on mules in the capacity of sais’es , so that he might be set on one of the mules and stowed in the middle of the crowd. Hamid urged the Chief of police not to listen to any appeal of Hallaj ; if he were to offer to transform the Tigris and Euphrates into gold and silver for his benefit, he must still not cease scourging him till he was killed according to orders. Mohammed b. ‘Abd al-Samad, the Chief of police, 1 carried these instructions out. He conveyed Hallaj that night in the style described, the retainers of Hamid riding with him till they brought him to the Bridge. Mohammed b. 'Abd al-Samad with his men passed the night round the Majlis. 2 When the morning of Tuesday—6 Dhud-Qa‘dah (March 26, 922) dawned, Hallaj was led out to the area of the Majlis, where an innumerable crowd of the populace assembled. The executioner was ordered to administer a thousand strokes of the scourge ; this was done and Hallaj uttered no cry nor did he plead for pardon. Only (my authority says) when he had got to the six hundredth blow (82) Hallaj called out to Mohammed b. 'Abd al- Samad : Summon me to your side and I will tell you some¬ thing which in the eyes of the Caliph will be equal to the storming of Constantinople. The Chief of police replied : 1 The date of his appointment in lieu of NujA Tuluni is not mentioned. 2 Here apparently the name of some police station or place of execution. VlZIERATE OF #AMID B. ‘ABBAS, 91 I have been told that you were likely to offer this, or even more, but there is no way whereby you can be relieved of the scourge, ifallaj then maintained silence till the thousandth stroke had been delivered, then his hand was amputated, then his foot, then he was decapi¬ tated ; his trunk was then burned, and his head erected on the Bridge. Afterwards the head was removed to Khorasan. #allajs adherents asserted that the victim of the blows was an enemy of his on whom his likeness had been cast, 1 some of them pretending to have seen #allaj and heard from him something of the sort, with follies not worth transcribing. The booksellers were summoned and made to swear that they would neither sell nor buy any of //allaj's works. Year 310. In this year by Mu'nis's request and intercession Yusuf Ibn Abi'l-Saj was released from confinement, and presently received a gift of money and clothing ; then he had an audience of Muqtadir, to whom he rode in black ; he kissed first the carpet, then the Caliph's hand ; a robe of reconciliation was then thrown over him, and he was mounted on a horse (82) with a gilt saddle. After some days Muqtadir held a court in the Public Saloon, at which he appointed him minister of prayer, public security, kharaj and Estates in Rayy, Qazwin, Abhar, Zanjan and Adharbaijan. 2 When he left the Palace there rode with him Mu'nis the Mu^affar, Nasr the Chamberlain, Shafi', MufliA, and indeed all the officers and retainers in the metropolis ; his house was filled with soldiers and arms, and there was a great gathering. Yusuf Ibn Abi'l-Saj appointed as his secre¬ tary Mohammed b. Khalaf Nirmani ; the provinces of 1 The same is said in the Qur’an (iv. 156) to have happened in the case of Jesus. 2 When we last heard of these provinces, the “ brother of Su'luk ” was in possession of them. 92 A.H. 310. Caliphate of Muqtadir. which he was given charge were made his fief on condi¬ tion that he should transmit to the metropolis every year 500,000 dinars, while himself defraying the per¬ manent expenditure and paying the army maintained in these provinces. Robes of honour were also bestowed on Wasif Bektimuri, and upon Tahir and Ya'qub sons of Mohammed b. ‘Amr b. al-Laith. In this year Nazuk was made Chief of police in Baghdad, and received a robe of honour, Mohammed b. ‘ Abd al-Samad being dismissed. A second robe of honour was bestowed on Wasif Bektimuri, who was attached to the service of Yusuf Ibn Abi’l-Saj, who departed to his province via Mausil. When he reached Ardabil he found that his retainer Sabuk was already dead. 1 This year there arrived in Baghdad a present from Abu Zunbur #usain b. A#mad Madara’i sent by him from Egypt; it contained a female mule with a foal which followed her and which she suckled, and a lad with a tongue so long that it could reach the tip of his nose. In this year there were arrested Umm Musa the Stewardess, her sister and her brother. Account of the reason for this. The reason was that Umm Musa had married the daughter of her brother Abu Bakr A#mad b. 'Abbas to Abu’l-'Abbas Ibn Mohammed b. Is#aq son of Mutawakkil, who was a prince of imperial blood, and a man of wealth, sumptuous in his living and attire, ( 84 ) his horses and his conveyances, and a friend of 'Ali b. 'Isa ; so much so that the ex-vizier was supposed to be training him for the Caliphate. When the alliance between him and Umm Musa became a fact, the stewardess spent extravagantly on distribution of largesses, and entertainments to which she invited the 1 In 304 he had seized Adharbaijan. VlZIERATE OF //AMID B. ‘ABBAS. 93 officers of the empire both great and small for a period of more than ten days. Her enemies got the oppor¬ tunity of throwing suspicion upon her, and put it into the minds of both Muqtadir and the Queen-mother t ^ a i [/r her P ur Pose in allying herself with the descendant of Mutawakkil was to depose Muqtadir and instal this prince in his place. Thus her fall was brought about, and she with her sister and her brother was handed over to the Stewardess Thumal, a woman who had a reputa¬ tion for cruelty, having been stewardess to Ahmad b. Abd al- Aziz b. Dulaf , 1 who used to deliver to her such of his slave-girls and slaves as had incurred his displeasure ; she became notorious for her harshness and the severity of her punishments. This Thumal forced Umm Musa, her sister and her brother to sur¬ render vast sums of money, and a marvellous amount of jewellery, wearing apparel, furniture and perfume ; a special bureau was established by 'Ali b. ‘Isa, to deal with all this, called Bureau of the property confiscated from Umm Musa and her dependents : in this their estates and other property were dealt with, and he made chief of it Abu Shuja' known as sister’s son to Abu A yyub, father of the vizier, controlled by the clerk Abu ‘Abdallah Yusufi. It is said that about a million dinars were obtained from these people. When Umm Musa had been arrested, ‘Ali b. ‘Isa dismissed Ibn Abi’l-Baghl from his offices in Fars, 2 and appointed to them Abu ‘Abdallah Ja'far b. Qasim Karkhi ; he also fined the former. When Ibn al-Furat was made vizier for the third time, he wrote to Karkhi bidding him renew Ibn Abi’l-Baghl’s fine and imprison him. In this year died Mohammed b. Jarir Tabari, about ninety years old ; he was buried at night, for the populace 1 A general of Mu'tatfid, repeatedly mentioned by Tabari. 2 He had only been retained in his office (finance minister of Ispahan) out of fear of Umyn Musa. 94 A.H. 311. Caliphate of Muqtadir. assembled and prevented his being buried in the day, as they charged him with rejecting the claims of the Abbasids and further with heresy. (85) In the same year Muqtadir invited Mu’nis the Mmaffar to drink in his presence and put on him the robes of a Messmate ( munadim ) of the Caliph ; these were heavily adorned with gold. Year 311. In this year #amid b. 'Abbas was dismissed from the vizierate and 'Ali b. 'Isa from the bureaux. Account of the dismissal of these ministers and the restoration of Ibn al-Furat to the vizierate. For this there were numerous causes. One of them was that Hamid planned guaranteeing the exaction of a certain sum from 'Ali b. 'Isa if the latter were surrendered to him, when the Caliph had cancelled his contract for farming the revenue of the provinces which we have enumerated. He further professed his readi¬ ness to finance the government and carry on the administration himself. 1 He was led to take this course by rumours having reached him of Muqtadir's design to reappoint Ibn al-Furat owing to the clamour raised by the court dependents against 'Ali b. Tsa, who delayed their pay and that of the Hareem and the princes, cut down the earnings of the court attendants, servants and cavalry, and took two months' pay off the stipends of the ministers, and four months off those of the pay¬ masters, secret service men, postmasters and judges. The general feeling against him grew strong, and Hamid b. 'Abbas was in dread of Ibn al-Furat owing to his former treatment of him and to his conduct towards his gson Mu/^assin and all his secretaries and dependents. He was ordered by Muqtadir to write out himself a 1 This seems to be the first mention of the system which afterwards was introduced by Ibn Ra’iq, the first Amir al-Umara. VlZIERATE OF HAMID B. 'ABBAS. 95 memoir stating what he guaranteed and what he offered, and naming the persons whom he proposed to make heads of bureaux. Hamid did this, and his memoir was shown by Muqtadir to Ibn al-Furat in prison, and the proposal explained to him. Ibn al-Furat replied that were Hamid b. 'Abbas to be supported by Hasan b. Makhlad , 1 Ahmad b. Isra’il , 2 and all other masters of administration, he would still be unequal to the government of the empire and even to the control of the bureaux ; and that if he were appointed to these offices the dignity of the empire would be impaired and all respect for it cease. 'Ali b. 'Isa, whatever his vicissitudes, was more competent than Hamid and more skilled in affairs and administration. ( 86 ) He then added : "I guarantee five times what is guaranteed by Hamid ”—meaning, if he were restored to office and given plenary powers. Muqtadir then promised that he would give him the chance. Hamid was at this time resident in Baghdad, not interfering with any of the state business, and merely presenting himself on days of state ceremonials and then returning home. He grew weary of his stay in the metropolis, owing to his painful humiliation, and the contemptuous treatment which he received from 'Ali b. 'Isa in his orders : who used to issue them to the clerks of the vizier (Hamid) and to those of the bureaux, mentioning his name in a manner which he found in¬ tolerable : thus he used to issue an order Let the Collector of the vizier (whom God help) be required to pay what is due from Wasit ; or : Let the vizier be notified that he must at once transmit the barley required for the horses. If any complaint were brought to him against the pro¬ ceedings of Hamid or his agents, he would write on the back of the note : This is a matter into which the vizier 1 A figure of the first period of anarchy. 2 Another figure of the same period. 96 A.H. 311. Caliphate of Muqtadir. {God help him) must look. ‘Ali b. 'Isa said that he could defend his style by the old practice of the viziers. Hamid asked the permission of Muqtadir to quit the capital for Wasit in order to oversee the revenue farming which he carried on in its neighbourhood. Obtaining this permission he departed. Another cause was the proceedings of Umm Musa and the story that has been told about her, with the current rumours about the descendant of Mutawakkil, and the supposition that the matter had been contrived by Ibn al-i/awari, whom Umm Musa favoured and to whom she revealed imperial secrets. One of the partisans of Ibn al-Furat had thrown into the dwelling of Muqtadir a paper containing a verse This is to greet thee, to greet thee O cock of the Caliph’s Palace The paper contained no more than this one verse which comes from an obscene set, of which this is the least offensive. The man took care that it should be placed on the route of the Caliph to one of his private apartments. Muqtadir read the paper, and was greatly disgusted with Ibn al-#awari ; he made up his mind to outlaw him and shed his blood, and ruin Umm Musa. It is indeed supposed that this verse was (87) one of the chief causes of her fallfandlhis. Another reason for the reappointment of Ibn al- Furat was that Mufli# the Negro was high in Muq- tadir’s favour, and constantly in attendance ; in time he became a great man, on whom fiefs were conferred, and the owner of vast estates. A dispute arose between him and H amid, in whichjgthe former grossly insulted the vizier ; #amid retorted : I have an idea of buying a hundred black slaves , naming them all Muflih and pre¬ senting them to my retainers. MufliA did not forget this jibe. Muhassin got to know of it and of some similar matters and got into communication with MufliA’s VlZIERATE OF HAMID B. 'AbBAS. 97 secretary, to whom he guaranteed office and fortune and honours so that at last he made an arrangement between MuAassin and his master. Mu/zassin then addressed a note to Muqtadir through Muffin, wherein he undertook to extract seven million dinars from J^amid, ‘Ali b. ‘Isa, Nasr the Chamberlain, Shafi Lu'luT, Ibn al-#awari, and Umm Musa, her brother and the Madara'is, if they were put into his power. Abu’l-i7asan Ibn al-Furat too from his prison kept stirring up Muqtadir against these persons, and exciting his cupidity. One of his most ingenious and remarkable devices was the following. One day he sent through the Stewardess Zaidan a request to Muqtadir for twelve thousand dinars or their value in gold, saying he required this amount for a certain purpose. Muqtadir, having taken so much of the property of Ibn al-Furat, felt unable to refuse this request; so he sent the sum to him. Presently Ibn al-Furat requested the Caliph, when he was passing by his place of confinement, to look in, as he wished to communicate something which could not form the subject of either a letter or a message. Muq¬ tadir used frequently to visit him and ask his advice. So Muqtadir visited him and when Ibn al-Furat saw the Caliph, he rose, and taking the sack which contained the dinars, opened it and poured the coins out before him. Then he said : Commander of the Faithful, I have told you how your money is plundered and wasted, and employed as ( 88 ) hush-money ; what do you say of a single individual who every lunar month earns this this sum out of your wealth, viz., twelve thousand dinars ?—Muqtadir was amazed and astounded and asked who the individual was. Ibn al-Furat replied : ‘Ali b. Mohammed b. al-T/awari, and this in addition to the perquisites which he obtains owing to his position as a court-favourite, and the secret profits which he 98 A.H. 311. Caliphate of Muqtadir. receives from the offices which he holds, &c. &c.—He then returned the dinars to Muqtadir, adding : I only wished you to see how you are being victimized, for seeing is believing.—Muqtadir left him, indignant at what went on, and fully bent on doing mischief to Ibn al- #awari. These causes coming together decided Muqtadir to restore the vizierate to Ibn al-Furat ; so when Thursday —9 Rabi' ii (Aug. 7, 923) arrived, on his descending the river to the Palace ‘Ali b. Tsa was arrested and given in charge of the Stewardess Zaidan, who confined him in the chamber wherein Ibn al-Furat had been lodged. The latter was removed thence to be appointed vizier. The following is the narration of Abu Mohammed ‘Ali b. Hisham : I was present with my father at a gathering in the house of Abu’l-iTasan Ibn al-Furat during his second vizierate, and heard him tell the following story : I was visited (he said) by Abu’l-Haitham 'Abbas b. Mohammed of Anbar in my place of confinement in Muqtadir’s Palace, and he demanded that I should write a bond for thirteen million dinars. I told him that such an amount of the Sultan’s money had not passed through my hands during my whole period of office ; how then could I be fined for such an amount ? He told me that he had been made to swear that he would divorce his wives unless I wrote out a bond for that sum. So I wrote out a bond for thirteen millions, without stating what and without giving any guarantee. He bade me write dinars so that he might be quit of his oath. I wrote the word but immediately ( 90 ) snatched the paper and swallowed it, 1 saying : You are now free of your oath and you shall get no more. He tried hard to move me, % 1 Compare Sir J. Hall, General Pichegru’s Treason, 1915, p. 57 : Courant showed that he was a man of resource;—he contrived at the first sign of danger not only to swallow unperceived Conde’s letter, &c. 99 Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. but I would assent to nothing. Next day he came to my prison bringing with him Umm Musa. He made the same demand as before, using the most violent language and charging me with adultery. I swore the most solemn oaths, offering to divorce my wives and free my slaves if I foreswore, that I had never committed any crime of that sort for more than thirty years. I bade him swear a similar oath, charging him with an unnatural offence. Umm Musa was shocked by the turn which things had taken and covered her face out of shame. 1 Ibn Thawabah said to her : His swagger is due to the money that is behind him, and he is like the barber in the story of Kisra or the cupper in the story of #ajjaj b. Yusuf. 2 Please obtain their Highnesses’ permission for the application of the torture, to make him agree to pay the money. (By their Highnesses he meant, said Ibn al-Furat, Muqtadir, the Queen-mother, and her sister Khafif and Dastanbuyah, umm wuld of Mu’ta^id, as they at this time owing to the youth of Muqtadir were in control of affairs).—So (said Ibn al- Furat) Umm Musa departed and presently returned, and said to Ibn Thawabah : They tell you that you are right and you are free to treat him as you please.— Now I was confined in a narrow apartment and it was 1 It is not clear how she came to have it uncovered. 8 These allusions are explained in the work of Hilal. A barber was shaving the Persian king, and in the process asked the king to give him his daughter in marriage. The attendants were told to take him away from the king's chair, and he was asked to repeat what he had said ; he declared that he had said nothing. This was done three times. The king inferred that the barber must have a treasure buried in the particular spot where he stood when he made the proposal, and a vast treasure was unearthed. (This story seems to be an im¬ provement on one in Kalilah wa-Dimnah, where a similar inference is drawn from the jumping of a rat.) The story of Hajjaj (governor of ‘Iraq for ‘Abd al-Malik and notorious for his ruthlessness) is that a cupper who was bleeding him requested the governor to tell him about his experiences with Ibn al-Ash'ath (‘Abd al-RaAmanb. Mohammed, a general who revolted against this governor in 81 a.h.), and only when he had obtained a promise that the governor would do so consented to complete the operation. Hajjaj, when it was finished, performed his promise,but ordered five hundred stripes to be administered to the cupper while he was telling the story.—Ibn Thawabah = Ibu ’1 Haitham, 100 A.H. 311. Caliphate of Muqtadir. very hot. Orders were given that the roof of matting should be removed so that I was exposed to the sun, and the rush-carpet was withdrawn from under me, while the doors of the adjoining offices were locked so that I could not get out of the sunshine. Then I was fettered with a heavy chain and clothed in a jubbah of wool that had been steeped in urine ; an iron collar was put upon my neck, and the door of my apartment locked behind him by Ibn Thawabah. I thought my end had come. After about four hours I heard the sound of retainers passing in the corridor in which the place of my confine¬ ment was, and the slaves who were in charge of me said : This is Badr the Eunuch of the private apartments, who is a creature of yours.—I shouted out to him implor¬ ing his help : For God's sake, Abu'l-Khair, I said, ( 91 ) you have influence with their Highnesses, and are under obligations to me ; you see the condition in which I am, to which death is preferable. Speak to their Highnesses and remind them of my claims and of my services in securing their throne when they were deserted by the people, and how I reconquered for them territories that had been seized, and recovered revenues that had been withheld. If my offence deserves death, then execution is easier than this.—He went and talked to them and mollified them, so that all the iron was removed from me, -I was allowed to be bathed and shaved, and have my clothes changed ; and orders were given that I was to be put in charge of Zaidan, who was to see to my comfort.—Badr brought me the good news and did not rest until it had all been accomplished. Then he said : Their Highnesses wish me to inform you that in future you shall suffer no harm. 1 This story seems out of its place here. If the author placed it here inten¬ tionally, probably his design was to account for the vindictiveness displayed by Ibn aJ-Furat during his third term of power. Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 101 Account of the third vizierate of Abu’l-Rasan Ibn al-Furat. So Abu’l-T/asan ( Ali b. Mohammed b. al-Furat entered upon his third vizierate on the day that has been mentioned ; a robe of honour was bestowed upon him, and his son Muhassin was summoned by Muqtadir from his house in Suq al-'A^ash and given a robe simul¬ taneously with his father. On that day no audience was given to Abud-Qasim Ibn al-#awari. Ibn al-Furat’s sons and dependents showed themselves, whereas some of i/amid's dependents went into hiding, others being arrested by MuAassin on his route. During the whole vizierate of #amid Abu 'Ali Ibn Muqlah served ‘Ali b. Tsa as controller of the Sawad, 1 and when Ibn al-Furat entered upon his third vizierate, he took courage, and instead of going into hiding visited the new vizier ; who manifested his displeasure in' a way which humiliated Ibn Muqlah, but did not arrest him owing to the friendship that existed between him and Ibn al-#awari; but when the latter was arrested, Ibn Muqlah was arrested also. Ibn al-Furat removed to his former dwelling in Mukharrim. Thither Ibn al-i/awari rode to congratulate him, paying a lengthy visit wherein he was cordially received by Ibn al-Furat, who asked his counsel, giving him a private interview, while Ibn al-FIawari endeavoured to ingratiate himself, expressing his pleasure at Ibn al-Furat’s appointment, though in fact terribly afraid of him. Now the depen¬ dents of this Abu’l-Qasim (92) Ibn al-Ffawari had urged him to go into hiding, telling him that Muqtadir would not have admitted him 2 on the day of Ibn al-Furat’s investiture, being aware of the hostility between you, except with some mischievous design. Ibn al-#awari replied that were that so, Muqtadir would have had him 1 i.e., supervisor of the finance. 8 This seems to be in contradiction to what preceded, p. 91. Perhaps however there is a distinction between admission to the Palace and to the Caliph's presence. 102 A.H. 311. Caliphate of Muqtadir. arrested before the investiture. On the Monday (Aug. 11, 923) both Ibn al-Furat and Ibn al-#awari sailed to the Palace, when audience was granted to the first but not to the second. This alarmed Ibn al-#awari, who after¬ wards explained the circumstance by the supposition that Ibn al-Furat had stipulated with Muqtadir that he should treat him as he had done during his second vizierate, when Ibn al-#awari did not accompany him on his public visits to the Palace, but only on his private visits. So when Ibn al-Furat had left the Caliph's presence and was by himself, he was visited by Ibn al-#awari, who was favourably received and con¬ sulted by the vizier about all the business. I, he said, have been out of touch with affairs for five years, whereas you are familiar with them. I hope therefore that I shall have your help, and that you will act as our friendship demands.—Ibn al-#awari expressed his gratitude for this language, and made a show of cordia¬ lity. Ibn al-Furat then started a long conversation, but rose before he had finished ; he then descended to his barge, taking with him Ibn al-#awari, his sister's son A#mad b. Nasr Baziyar, his son-in-law Mohammed b. Tsa, 'Ali b. Ma'mun Iskafi his secretary, and 'Ali b. Khalaf, whose brother Mohammed b. Khalaf 1 was related to him (Ibn al-#awari) by marriage. He pre¬ tended to treat them all with respect and cordiality, and kept on cracking jokes with them until he reached his own palace, where he whispered an order to 'Abbas Farghani his chamberlain to arrest Ibn al-FTawari and all his dependents. They were arrested and imprisoned by him in an inner apartment of the palace. Ibn al- Furat at once sent for Shah' Lu'lu'i, and despatched him to the house of Ibn al-#awari to preserve it from being plundered ; giving him a number of horse and foot-soldiers as escort. (93) He further ordered that Ibn al-i/awari should be liberally treated in the matter of 1 At this time secretary to Ibn Abi’l-Saj. Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 103 food and drink, and assigned him a spacious apartment, cleanly furnished, where however he was not allowed to communicate with his clerks and confidential friends. Ibn al-Furat then sent to negotiate with him on the subject of his fine, and the negotiations were conducted by Ibn Qarabah, who was endeavouring to ingratiate himself with Ibn al-Furat, and was on intimate terms with Ibn al-#awari. After long discussion the fine was fixed at 700,000 dinars, for himself exclusive of his clerks and dependents. He stipulated that Ahmad b. Nasr Baziyar should be liberated, to be employed in paying the advance instalment, 250,000 dinars. He was ac¬ cordingly released and the guards were withdrawn from the apartments of Ibn al-#awari and his dependents, who were all delivered to A/miad b. Nasr. Ibn al-Furat further ordered raids on various places where dependents or clerks of iTamid were to be found, and ferreted them out; Muhassin exceeded all limit in the tortures which he inflicted on those who fell into his hands. Thus he summoned Ibn Fammad of Mausil, and obtained his bond for 200,000 dinars, after which he handed him over to his exactor, who cuffed him violently, but not so as to satisfy Mu^assin, who had him brought into his own presence, and cuffed him on the head so that the blood spurted out of his nose and mouth and he died. Muqtadir made no objection, though MuAassin had been in great alarm lest he should disapprove ; after a few days the Caliph sent him the robes of a “ messmate ” and increased his salary by two thousand dinars a month over and above his allowance as President of the Bureaux. This whetted the appetite of Mu/zassin for torture, and immoderate praise was bestowed by Muqtadir on his conduct, to such an extent that the slave-girls sang in the royal presence Muhassin 1 has done well, done well 1 1 The name is derived from the adjective " good." 104 A.H. 311. Caliphate of Muqtadir. //amid b. 'Abbas's son-in-law Mohammed b. Ahmad b. Bis tam had gone into hiding, but was discovered by MuAassin, who extorted from him 60,000 dinars and obtained his bond for 200,000 after severe torture, and depriving him of a eunuch named Marj to whom he was well known to be attached. ( 94 ) In this style he arrested many persons, seized handsome slaves and eunuchs belonging to them, and inflicted torture on them¬ selves. Arrest oj Hamid b % c Abbas by the vizier Ibn al-Furat . Muqtadir had stipulated with Ibn al-Furat, that i/amid should not be ruined, but that the former should examine him with reference to the surplus of the revenue which he farmed, and that if anything was due from him, in the opinion of the clerks and judges, Ibn al-Furat should be satisfied with part of it; for, he said, //amid has served me and accepted a stipend for one year only, stipulating that I should not hand him over to be tortured and that I should urge no claims against hirn.—So Ibn al-Furat was compelled to retain him as farmer of the revenue of Wasit, and addressed him in complimentary phrase. Presently however he had accounts made up against him, subjected his reports to the severest scrutiny, and made him responsible for vast sums ; he also wrote to his agents bidding them demand payment from him with insistence, and ordering them, if he made any delay, to place him in charge of men who would importune him for the money necessary for repairs and for seeds, purposes which admitted of no delay ; for the Commander of the Faithful, he stated, would not consent to a fresh contract being made with him.—The agent of the vizier Ibn al-Furat showed this letter in his committee-room * and the news reaching //amid at once, the latter announced in W asit that orders had come to him from Muqtadir to come to Baghdad. So he left Wasit accom¬ panied by all his clerks and dependents, and his foot- Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 105 soldiers, taking with him all the furniture, utensils, and wearing apparel which he habitually used, after carefully depositing his treasures and valuable goods with trust¬ worthy inhabitants of Wasit. He signalled his de¬ parture by trumpet-blast. He then made all his retainers and dependents embark in launches and barges, and sent word by quick runners and carrier-pigeons to Ibn al-Furat. ( 95 ) His horses and those of his attend¬ ants and followers were being led on the bank. When the news reached Ibn al-Furat, he consulted his son MuAassin and his confidential friends about the course which he had best take. They advised him to hasten to Muqtadir and read him Hamid’s letter. Muqtadir declared that he had no knowledge of Hamid’s pro¬ ceedings and had written him no letter of the sort which he asserted he had received.—Ibn al-Furat said that if this were so, the best plan would be to send Nazuk 1 with a company of H ujari retainers and regular horse and foot, some by water and some on land, to arrest #amid and his party.—Ibn al-Furat ; having obtained the Caliph's leave for this, returned to his house, and despatched Nazuk, urging him to use haste, so as to arrest the whole party and let none of them escape. Nazuk started, but made the mistake of arresting the first of the party that he met, consisting of slaves with the horses ; #amid, getting intelligence of this, left the route and went into hiding. Nazuk's party plundered some of the baggage that was with the company, and Nazuk obtained possession of his papers, accounts and deeds, all of which he brought to Baghdad. Muqtadir ordered all these papers and deeds to be delivered to Ibn al-Furat, while he distributed the baggage over his own stores and the horses among his stables. Among the papers brought to him Ibn al-Furat found extraordinary letters of persons whose favour 1 At this time Chief of police. 106 A.H. 311. Caliphate of Muqtadir. Hamid had been anxious to secure ; these persons were arrested by his order. When Ibn al-Furat received Hamid's message announcing his journey to Baghdad, the former took the precaution of placing under guard his collector Ibrahim who happened to be in the metro¬ polis. When Nazuk had succeeded in arresting the de¬ dependents of Hamid, Ibn al-Furat instructed Hisham 1 to treat this collector now with leniency, now with harshness, and to question him concerning Hamid's deposits. Hisham carried out these instructions and the collector confessed of his own accord that he himself had in his keeping 100,000 dinars in gold belonging to //amid, and swore that he had no other deposit belonging to either Hamid or any of his dependents. Ibn al-Furat guaranteed him his life and that he would not deliver him to MuAassin, but did not communicate the discovery of this hundred thousand dinars to Muqtadir ( 96 ) until he had got Hamid into his power. A report got about in Rajab (15 Oct.-13 Nov., 923) that Hamid had gone into hiding because Muqtadir had written to him complaining of his leaving Wasit in the manner described, and ordering him to approach Baghdad by a secret route, that he, the Caliph, might make sure of him and obtain his bond for the sum which he offered to guarantee upon Ibn al-Furat, MuAassin and their clerks and dependents, if they were put into his power. Ibn al- Furat s sons Mu/^assin, al-Fa^l, Husain and Hasan with their wives and most of their clerks went into hiding ; and of the clerks who attended meetings in Ibn al-Furat's palace none remained except Abu'l-Qasim Ibn Zanji only. However Hamid's lucky days were over. He came to the Palace in the garb of a monk, attended by his slave Mu nis, and mounted to the Chamberlain's apartments, where the Chamberlain Nasr lived. Faris b. Rundaq announced him, saying : Hamid b. ‘Abbas 1 Hisham b. 'Abdallah, Treasurer. Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 107 is at the door and requests to be admitted to the ustadh} Nasr replied : Bid him enter. When he entered and before he had taken a seat, Nasr said to him : Where are you coming to ? He replied : I have come in accord¬ ance with your letter. Nasr retorted : What, did I write to you to come here ?—Nasr declined to rise to greet him, excusing himself on the ground that H amid was under the frown of the Caliph. Nasr then sent to MufliA, requesting that he would come round, MufliA being the official who demanded admissions to Muqtadir when the latter was in his private apartments. MufM came round, and Nasr pleaded ifamid’s cause with him ; He is now, he said, an object of pity, and it would be like you to be merciful to him and not punish him for what he did on those occasions. 2 H amid then said to MufhA : Tell our lord the Commander of the Faithful that I am prepared to be confined in the Palace as ‘Ali b. Tsa is confined, and to be examined by the vizier, Mu/^assin, and the clerks in the presence of the jurists, judges, and chief captains ; if I be found to have incurred a fine, I am prepared to pay it after I have had (97) full oppor¬ tunity to set out my defence, and provided my life be secured, and Mu/^assin be not given power over my blood, so as to avenge himself for the tortures which I inflicted on him 3 by the will of our lord the Commander of the Faithful when he was a lad, whereas I am an old man, at whose advanced age a little torture will prove fatal.— MufM promised to take his message ; he then went to Muqtadir and spoke to him on the subject of #amid, but in a style that was the contrary of that which he had promised to adopt. The Queen-Mother however pleaded tfamid’s cause, saying that there would be no harm in his being confined in the Palace and being examined provided his life were spared.—Mufli/* how- 1 A term indicating high office at this period. a His quarrel with MufliA was described above, p. 87. 8 Above, p. 65. 108 A.H. 311. Caliphate of Muqtadir. ever objected that, if this course were taken, Ibn al- Furat would be able to execute none of his measures ; for rumour was rife (about his impending fall), the world would be devastated, and the sources of revenue fail.— Muqtadir agreed that Mufl ih was right, and bade him go back to Nasr and order him to despatch #amid to Ibn al-Furat. MufliA brought this order to Nasr, who endeavoured to allay the terror of #amid by saying to him : You must proceed with one of my trusty agents to interview the vizier, but after that I will bring you back to the Caliphs Palace.—i7amid then begged Nasr for some clothes into which he might change from his monks costume, but MufM refused to give permission for this, declaring that he had been ordered by their master to despatch him in the clothes in which he had presented himself. Nasr however pleaded so earnestly that he conceded this point. #amid was then sent off in the company of Ibn Rundaq the door-keeper, and MufM sent his clerk in haste to Ibn al-Furat to tell him the good news of the arrival of #amid, and Muqtadir’s order that he should be delivered to the vizier. Ibn al-Furat had been in a state of great alarm and anxiety when he heard of the arrival of amid at the Palace, and when his clerks and his sons had all gone into hiding. When he received MufliA's message he became somewhat calmer, performed the afternoon prayer, and took his seat in the council-room where there was no-one before him except Ibn Zanji. He was examining state papers with very moderate attention till one of the slaves mentioned that one of the Court barges was approaching. Presently it came up to the steps of his palace, when the porters hurried to announce it. In came Ibn al-Rundaq accompanied by Hamid b. 'Abbas ! Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 109 When Ibn al-Furat saw him, he asked him why he had left his province and come.—He replied : I have come in obedience to yonr letter.—If so, said Ibn al- Furat, why did you not (98) come directly to my house ? —God's guidance failed me, was his reply.—Throughout this dialogue JTamid addressed Ibn al-Furat with a simple thou y instead of in the third person as the vizier. Ibn al-Rundaq then produced the letter of Nasr the Chamber- lain to the vizier stating that he was sending #amid to him, and it was tossed by Ibn al-Furat to Ibn Zanji with the order to report his arrival. Ibn Zanji wrote to that effect and handed the answer to Ibn al-Rundaq, who then left the chamber. When he had departed, Hamid's heart began to fail him, and he showed signs of weakness ; he assumed a milder tone, and addressed Ibn al-Furat as vizier. The latter bade Yahya b. 'Abdallah, his house-steward, allot a spacious apart¬ ment in his palace to the use of #amid ; it was to be well furnished, and the steward was to see that the guest was supplied with food, drink, and perfume of the sort with which he was served when he was vizier. He was also to have splendid apparel made for H amid, and appoint two black slaves, ignorant of Arabic, to wait upon him when he was alone ; the steward himself was to take his meals with him, at which time they were to be attended by confidential servants and waiters. Account of the treatment which Yiamid received and of his own conduct. On the afternoon of that day visits were paid #amid by 'Abdallah b. Farajawaihi and Ahmad b.#ajjaj b. Makhlad son-in-law of Musa b. Khalaf, on whom Z/amid in the days of his vizierate had inflicted unheard-of tortures. 1 They reproached him for his ill-treatment of them.—He at first denied that he had ever seen them or noticed them in his life ; but when they dilated on the 1 Above, p. 66. 110 A.H. 311. Caliphate of Muqtadir. subject, he said to them: You have both been prolix in your charges, and I will give you a concise answer: If my methods which you have been describing and my treatment of people have brought me any good, I advise you to do the like and more ; but if they are reprehensible, and have ultimately put me into your power, I advise you to avoid them. “ Happy is he who takes warning by others.” 1 They left him and repeated what he had said to Ibn al- Furat. He thought //amid had scored, (99) and said : I do not deny his ability and quick-wittedness ; still he is doomed to Hell-fire, as he has not recoiled from blood¬ shed and torture. Thabit writes as follows in his history : It is most extraordinary that Ibn al-Furat should say this, should approve and affirm the doctrine of //amid, and assert that he had earned Hell-fire by his foul deeds : and that he at the same time, with all his generosity, his mag¬ nanimity, his personal integrity and general philanthropy, should express no disapproval of the atrocious methods employed by his son Mu^assin, 2 the very methods which Ibn al-Furat thought so disgraceful in //amid; no, though Mu/zassin was twice as barbarous as //amid, his father neither forbade him nor bade him take warning from Z/amid's fate, and be “ the happy man who takes warning by others.” And yet a man who defies God with his eyes open and after warning and remonstrance is very different from one who does so thoughtlessly and without his conscience being roused. After this Ibn al-Furat sent to //amid to demand a statement of his assets ; and he admitted the possession of 200,000 dinars, 100,000 being the sum which he had lodged with his Collector Ibrahim, he having learned that it had got into Ibn al-Furat’s hands from this collector, and that MuAassin had obtained another sum from his eunuch Mu'nis and transmitted it to Muqtadir. l An Arabic proverb. Frey tag 1. 628. 2 This is not borne out by the sequel, Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. Ill Mu/zassin had written to the Caliph that he had obtained this sum of the man’s own initiative without examina¬ tion or torture, and held out hopes to the Caliph that further vast sums might be extorted from Z/amid ; and indeed he presently by applying severe torture extorted a further 40,000 dinars from the same Mu’nis, while various of H amid’s dependents were fined other sums. Ibn al-Furat summoned //amid b. 'Abbas to appear before the jurists, judges and secretaries of state, and submitted him to a lengthy ( 100 ) examination, //amid made a good case until Ibn al-Furat produced a docu¬ ment which he had found in the boxes of Gharib, a retainer of //amid, employed in the sale of his crops at al-Furiah. 1 The vizier confronted //amid with this and produced Gharib, who admitted the genuineness of the paper, which he had carried off by mistake, it being Z/amid’s custom every year to collect his bills and fling them into the Tigris ; but when fate was bringing about his downfall, he forgot to ask his assistant for this docu¬ ment, which was written like any other on the back of a leaf, and was with a collection of such leaves. The price of the crops of one year according to this document was 540,000 odd dinars, exclusive of the barley for the horses which was transmitted to Baghdad. So it appeared that the surplus obtained by the revenue- farmer was more than double, and, besides that, the prices of that year, the second of the contract, were low, those which held in all the subsequent years being higher. So Ibn al-Furat damaged Z/amid’s case, ( 101 ) and he obtained the written declarations of the judges and state-secretaries and of Shaft' Lu’lu’i that so far the case had gone against //amid. Ibn al-Furat had conducted his examination with civility, using no harsh or offensive expressions, merely 1 This word means “the Dock," and figures as a place-name in Yaqut’s Geo¬ graphical Dictionary, though the places which he mentions are not apparently either of them identical with that mentioned here. 112 A.H. 311. Caliphate of Muqtadir. arguing against him, and giving him full opportunity to defend himself. Muhassin on the other hand publicly insulted him in the vilest manner, and told him that the money would be extracted from him only by use of the same tortures as he had himself inflicted on others. Mu^assin* undertook to obtain from him, if he were de¬ livered into his power, a million dinars without delay ; and was prepared to forfeit his life if he failed to do so. His father tried to repress him and stop his abuse, but he declined to stop. Hamid finally addressed himself to the vizier, saying : Your son has been most insulting, and I have put up with it, not for his sake, but out of respect Hr the vizier's court. Over and above my present plight I have nothing to fear but execution ; and, had I not felt obliged to treat the vizier's court with respect, I should have re¬ taliated.—Ibn al-Furat then swore that if MuAassin insulted Hamid any more he would request the Caliph to excuse him from continuing the examination.—This threat was effective in stopping MuAassin's abuse. The examination was repeatedly resumed, but Hamid's final statement was always the same : that he had no money, and having already sold his estates and sources of income, his furniture and his house, he had no means of raising any. When Ibn al-Furat found that his expedients for dealing with him failed, he interviewed him by himself in one of his private apartments, where no-one could overhear. Using civil language, he swore to Hamid that if he would tell the truth about his goods and trea¬ sures, he should not be delivered to Mu/zassin nor removed from the vizier s palace ; his life would be safe, and either he might remain in the palace an honoured guest, or he might be sent to Fars as governor, or to any place he chose, accompanied by one of the Sultan's servants as bodyguard. After giving the most solemn assurances to this effect, he proceeded : You are aware that you Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 113 guaranteed the Commander of the Faithful to obtain a certain sum from me if I were put into your power, when I redeemed myself by a payment of 700,000 (102) dinars 1 which I declared without compulsion, thereby saving myself from you. You pretend to have forgotten all the benefits conferred upon you by me and by my brother. 2 Now the Caliph is bent on putting you into the power of Mu^assin, who is a young man, who has a reckoning against you for tortures inflicted by your order on him, the like of which had never before been used upon a vizier or one of his family. My advice is that you ransom your¬ self with your wealth and so save yourself from being delivered into his hands. When Ibn al-Furat had bound himself by solemn oaths, iJamid inclined to his advice, thus backed, and revealed certain hoards buried by him in pits which he had dug, and wherein he had personally deposited the treasure, amounting to half a million dinars. He also confessed to having deposited with various persons of eminence and “ witnesses ” sums to the amount of some 300,000 dinars. He further admitted the posses¬ sion of wearing apparel and perfume deposited in Wasit. Ibn al-Furat received a bond for all this, and hastened to ride to Muqtadir without letting Mu//assin accompany him or telling him anything of the matter. Muqtadir was delighted and promised to put in his power any one on whom he guaranteed a payment, such as Nasr the Chamberlain, Shafi' Lu'lu'i, and others. Ibn al-Furat advised that the second of these be sent to secure the money in Wasit. He went thither, unearthed the buried treasure, drew out the deposits, and brought all to Muqtadir. 1 Above, p. 66. 2 The story is told in Tanukhi’s Faraj ba‘d al-shiddah i. 114. When Hamid was imprisoned by the vizier Isma'il b. Bulbul, Abu’l-'Abbas Ibn al-Furat, who was employed in the bureau, was charged with favouring him and actually did so according to his account. 114 A.H. 311. Caliphate of Muqtadir. Hamid remained secure in Ibn al-Furat’s palace until MuAassin, using Mufli/z as intermediary, requested Muq¬ tadir to send an order to his father, to make him, MuAassin, his deputy over all the bureaux and the admin¬ istration of the empire in general. A series of letters followed from Muqtadir to Ibn al-Furat, conveyed by MufliA ; Ibn al-Furat was vexed with his son, and various debates succeeded, till MuAassin received a robe of honour, 1 and his father with the Captains rode with him, 2 after which he and his father returned to their respective dwellings. Presently MuAassin rode 3 with his father to the Palace, where in his father's presence he addressed ( 103 ) the Caliph, stating that a vast sum still stood against tfamid, being part of his fine, and that if i/amid were put into his power, he would extract from him half a million dinars. Muqtadir thereupon ordered Ibn al- Furat to deliver Hamid to MuAassin. Ibn al-Furat objected that he had given Hamid his word that he should not be delivered to MuAassin. MuAassin however returned to the charge until at last Muqtadir gave an order which Ibn al-Furat could not resist, 4 and sur¬ rendered Hamid to MuAassin, who had him conveyed to his own residence. There he demanded the sum men¬ tioned, and started torturing him, while Hamid main¬ tained that he possessed no wealth of any sort or kind. MuAassin ordered him to be cuffed, and this was done fifty times, when he fell in an unconscious state ; the blows however were continued until at last Hamid asked what MuAassin wanted of him.—The money, he replied.— Nothing remains, he said, but my estate.—Then, said Mu^assin, make out a power of attorney to Ibn Mukram for > e sale of the property A#mad b. Kamil the qadi being present. He wrote as he was bidden, and the As a sign that his appointment had been made. 2 From the Palace. 3 Or “ sailed.” Smitt,™Aiar, r p S 1 ”39 rly P ' aCed “ Akbar ' S time - c ° mmi «ed suicide. Vincent Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 115 deed was attested. After this Mutossin proceeded to treat him with humiliating mockery, and then put him in charge of one of his eunuchs who with five horsemen and ten foot-soldiers was to take him down the river to Wasit and there sell his lands and goods. A story was circulated in Baghdad that on the night of his departure i/amid asked for some eggs, which were brought him ;* ten of these he sucked for his breakfast, but the servant of MuAassin in whose charge he was had poisoned them, and shortly after he had swallowed them he began to cry out, being seized with violent diarrhoea. When he entered Wasit he was prostrate, and was delivered by the servant to Mohammed b.'Ali Bazaufari, who let him remain in his house, while the servant hastily went home. i/amid’s diarrhoea attacked him more than a hundred times, though he took no food but barley- porridge. Bazaufari in order to secure himself against suspicion summoned the qa^i and the Witnesses of Wasit, and wrote out an affidavit as follows : H amid reached Wasit suffering from diarrhoea, which had attacked him on the road between Baghdad and Wasit, and was received by Bazaufari in that condition ; if then he should die ( 104 ) of this complaint, his death will be a natural one, wherein Bazaufari will have had no hand. He sent this affidavit to //'amid, who made a show of readiness to set his name to the contents. When the judge and the Witnesses appeared, he said to them : The infidel, miscreant, Ibn al-Furat, who makes no secret that he rejects the claims of ‘Abbasids, gave me his word of honour, and swore to me by the oath of allegiance and with the forfeit of divorce that if I made a true statement of all my pos¬ sessions he would not deliver me to his son MuAassin, and would secure me from all forms of torture, and let me to go my home and appoint me to some honourable office. I in consequence made a true statement of all I possessed ; and now he has delivered me into the hands of his son MuAassin, who has tortured me in exquisite 116 A.H. 311. Caliphate of Muqtadir. ways, and despatched me with his servant (whom he named), and treacherously made me suck poisoned eggs, in consequence of which I have been attacked by diar¬ rhoea ; Bazaufari has no hand in my murder this time, but he has done other things, among them he has taken money and goods of mine and stuffed them into torn cushions of brocade, which are being sold at five dirhems a piece, while they contain goods worth three thousand dinars ; these he buys himself. Do you attest what I have set forth to you. Bazaufari then perceived that he had blundered ; and the secret service agent in Wasit sent to Ibn al-Furat a complete report of Hamid’s statement. tfamid died on the night of the 13th of Ramadan 311 (Dec. 25, 923). The Proceedings in the case of’Ali b. 'Isa and his delivery to Ibn al-Furat. When Muqtadir arrested ‘Ali b. ‘Isa and placed him m charge of the Stewardess Zaidan, he' sent a message telling him to make a true statement of his wealth. The ex-vizier wrote a note wherein he asserted that he could produce no more than three thousand dinars. It so happened that news arrived of the entry of Abu Tahir ulaiman B. Hasan Jannabi into Basrah on the TZ g /?nS diy ~ 5 Rabi 923) at the head ot 1700 ( 105 ) foot-soldiers, having effected his entry by ladders which he had planted during the night against e wall; having thus scaled the wall, he had descended into the town, slain the keepers of the town gates, and opened them ; he had then thrown between each pair o eaves sand and pebbles which he had brought with im on camels, so that the doors could not be closed against hum It was further reported that Sabuk, freed- nTln,,' f overnor of Basrah, had not learned this till the Monday morning, and was then unaware Third VizierateIof Ibn al-Furat. 117 that the invader was the son of Abu SaTd Jannabi, and supposed the people to be Bedouins ; he had there¬ fore ridden incautiously to meet the invader ; a fierce battle had ensued, wherein Sabuk had been killed, after which Abu Tahir had instituted a massacre of the people of Basrah, burned the Mirbad quarter, and in part the public mosque ; and had burned besides the mosque of the Tomb of Tslhah without injuring the Tomb itself. The people fled to Kalla, 1 whence they fought for some days, but after many had been slain, the survivors flung themselves into the water and most of them were drowned. Abu Tahir remained in Basrah seventeen days, and then having loaded his camels with all the goods, women and children that they could carry, went home. So soon as Ibn al-Furat heard the news of the Qarmadan raid, he despatched to Basrah Bunayy b. Nafis and Ja'far of Zaranj, made Mohammed b. 'Ab¬ dallah Fariqi 2 minister of public security in Basrah, and gave him a robe of honour. He proceeded down the river in a fleet of barges and launches. The news of his arrival came after the departure of Abu Tahir Jan¬ nabi. He appointed his own officers in the place, and Bunayy with Ja'far departed. Bunayy b. Nafis before leaving despatched to Baghdad a number of Qarmadans who, he said, had surrendered, and averred that 'Ali b. Tsa had written requesting them to go to Basrah ; and that on a variety of occasions he had sent them presents and arms. They reached Baghdad, and Ibn al-Furat communicated this affair to Muqtadir. Account of ‘Ali b. ‘Isas examination by Ibn al-Furat. Ibn al-Furat, having exhibited to Muqtadir the actual letter of Bunayy, was ordered to fetch ‘Ali b. Tsa out of 1 Name of a quarter of Basrah. 2 In the year 304 this person had been defeated in Armenia. 118 A.H. 311. Caliphate of Muqtadir. his place of confinement ( 106 ) to examine him and con¬ front him with the Qarma/ians, who could then charge him to his face. Ibn al-Furat carried out this order. ‘Ali b. ‘Isa objected that when a man was in his situation, i.e., under the Sultan’s frown, men would falsely charge him to his face, especially if the vizier himself was alienated and had a grievance against him. Ibn al- Furat then began to talk to him about the provincial administration ; among the matters on which he ques¬ tioned him was the affair of the two Madara’i, about which he said : In the days of my second vizierate Ibn Bis lam obtained their bond for 2,300,000 dinars as a compromise for what was due from them for the kharaj of their estates in Egypt and Syria, and the secret profits which they had enjoyed during their tenure of office in your first vizierate. Of this sum they paid in my time half a million dinars ; you, so soon as you became chief of the bureaux, dismissed Ibn Bis/am, and reappointed these two officials, who so openly embezzled the Sultan’s property, composing a letter in the name of the Com¬ mander of the Faithful (whose life God prolong !) addressed to them, wherein they were excused the whole of the residue. You pretend that the Commander of the Faithful ordered this; but when I brought the matter to his notice, he declared that he had issued no such order, and could not believe that any one would venture to do such a thing.—‘Ali b. ‘Isa replied that at the time he was clerk and deputy to Hamid b. ‘Abbas, whom the Commander of the Faithful had bidden him obey //amid had asserted that the Commander of the Faithful had ordered the sum to be remitted to these two officials, and had given a written order to that effect; he, Ali b. Isa, had merely subscribed to Z/amid’s order, bidding it be carried out, as was the custom for the vizier’s deputy to do when ordered by his chief.—Ibn al- Furat retorted that ‘Ali b. ‘Isa had been in the habit of opposing and disputing with //amid about every trifle, Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 119 and scrutinizing his assessments in the lands which he farmed ; how then, he asked, could you have failed to solicit the permission of the Commander of the Faithful in the case of so immense a sum ? ‘Ali b. Tsa replied that he had at first and ( 107 ) for the space of seven months been clerk to H amid ; then (he said) the Commander of the Faithful saw reasons for relying upon me, and this affair of the two Madam’i took place in the early days of jEfamid’s administration.—Ibn al-Furat said to him : Then when the Commander of the Faithful placed his reliance on you, why did you not tell him the truth about ilamid’s error in this matter and set it right ?— ‘Ali b. Tsa replied : I passed this over because in the year 6, month Dhu’l-Qa'dah 1 I had presented Husain b. A/miad Madara’i to the Caliph and obtained his bond at the same audience for a million dinars annually, to be transmitted to the Treasury net without deduction of a single dirhem, in return for the contract assigned him whereby he was to farm the kharaj and the Estates in Egypt and Syria, and to pay all permanent expenses and the stipend of the army in those regions. For the sums to be paid under these heads in each district a contract was also made out; and I made him responsible to the amount of 130,000 dinars for moneys delayed or withheld in these transactions. That was the utmost that I could do. His bond is in the bureau of the West.— Ibn al-Furat said : You have been employed in the bureaux since you were a child, were president for many years of the bureau of the West, have been a vizier, and have managed the empire for a long space of time : do you know any case of an official remitting a debt which should be paid at once and taking as a set-off a sum to be paid in the future and dependent on the proceeds of revenue-farming ? But grant that, as you say, you " passed this over,” as a measure of prudence, still did you obtain the money guaranteed by this revenue-farmer 1 Began April 5, 919. 120 A.H. 311. Caliphate of Muqtadir. during the five years of your administration ?— ‘Ali b. ‘Isa’s reply to this was that a certain amount of the money had been transmitted in the first year, then there had come the invasion of the ‘Alid from Africa, who had occupied most of the districts of Egypt; Mu’nis the Muzaffar had been despatched to fight with the invader, and most of the money had been diverted to the pay of the troops and the expenses of the armies. What remained had to be deducted owing to the contributions levied by the invader ( 108 ) on the regions neighbouring Egypt. 1 —Ibn al-Furat then said : The ‘Alid has been routed since Safar of the year 9, 2 so that the revenue- farmer is liable for two whole years since his defeat ; have you obtained the two million dinars from him ?— Ali b. Isa s reply to this is not recorded.—In conclusion Ibn al-Furat said to him: The Commander of the Faithful has now ordered me to make you refund the moneys which you have amassed by dishonesty to him ; you will do well to reveal them of your own accord, and so save yourself from torture.—‘Ali b. ‘Isa replied that he was not a rich man and the utmost which he could produce was three thousand dinar s Then Ibn al-Furat proceeded to examine him with reference to the allowances of the court; You, he said, in the five years of your administration, reduced the allowances of the hareem, the princes, the attendants and the horsemen, which were regularly paid by me during my first and second vizierate, by 45,000 dinars a month (including the proceeds of the private estates), making a yearly total of 540,000 dinars, and for the whole period six millions. 3 Either then you must have em¬ bezzled this sum or have wasted it.—‘Ali b. ‘Isa replied : The import of this is not quite clear. Hilal, p. 290, seems not to have understood it. 2 Began June 11, 921. 3 ^, llal n 1S a PP arentl y staggered by this arithmetic, and substitutes “ a vast sum. Perhaps for “ six ” we should read “ three.” Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 121 The revenue which I obtained from these estates and saved out of the allowances of persons who did not require it was used by me to cover the deficit so that a balance was restored. I did not touch the private treasury of the Caliph at all. As for the 45,000 dinars which you used to assign to the court after obtaining them from secret profits, I do not approve of your method of ob¬ taining the money, nor do I permit officials to make secret profits ; I forbade and abolished such practices and did not put myself in the way of them, because they lead to waste of the Sultan’s property, the vexation of his subjects, and the devastation of his land. Your plan for meeting expenditure was to transfer sums from the private to the public treasury, thereby pleasing the court, but emptying the treasury.—The discussion ( 109 ) con¬ tinued for some time on these lines. Then Ibn al-Furat proceeded to examine ‘Ali b. Tsa on the subject of the presents and the arms transmitted by him to the Qarmafians, and the correspondence and amenities which had passed between him and them.— 'Ali b. Tsa said : My purpose was by conciliation to bring them back to their allegiance. Twice during my vizierate I restrained them from attacking the pilgrims and from raiding the districts of Kufah and Basrah. They also released a number of Moslem prisoners who were in their hands.—Ibn al-Furat said : And what could be worse than your attesting that Abu Sa‘id and his followers, who deny the Qur’an and the mission of the Prophet, plundered Oman and either slew or made captive its inhabitants, are Moslems ? Than your corre¬ sponding with them, and delaying payment of the guardians of the wall of Basrah so that they left their places, and enabled the Qarmafian to enter and slaughter the inhabitants ?—The reply which he gave would take too long to set forth. Nasr the Chamberlain and Muhassin asked Ibn al- Furat to let them have a private interview with 'Alib. Tsa ; 122 A.H. 311. Caliphate of Muqtadir. this was permitted and the two advised him to submit to a fine. He assented, and they fixed it at 300,000 dinars of which 100,000 should be paid within a month to commence when he left the Palace for some place where he could be sure of his life and could receive visits. Ibn al-Furat obtained his bond for this, and sent it to Muqtadir who countersigned it. Ibn al-Furat then wrote letters to the heads of the bureaux in his own name, wherein he recounted ‘Ali b. ‘Isa's dishonesty, and breach of trust, the charges with which he had confronted him and the fine which he had agreed to pay. Abu’l-Faraj Ibn Hisham narrates after Ibn al- Mutawwaq that ‘Ali b. ‘Isa requested Ibn al-Furat to leave him the revenue of his estate for the year 311 that he might pay it as part of his fine. Ibn al-Furat said to him : It is 50,000 dinars. ‘Ali b. ‘Isa replied that he would be satisfied with 20,000, but asserted ( 110 ) that it was less than that sum. When he was banished to Meccah his estate was found to produce about 50,000 dinars. Abu’l-Faraj continues : I heard Humani of Wasit say : I heard ‘Ali b. ‘Isa once upbraiding Abu ‘Abdallah Baridi 1 and asking him whether he was not afraid of God’s vengeance when he swore before an assembly in the Palace that the revenue obtained b}^ him and his brothers from their estate in Wasit was but 10,000 dinars, when it had been shown by the accounts handed in by him (Humani) to be 30,000 dinars. Baridi replied : I have only followed the example of your excellence, whom God support, when being asked by Ibn al-Furat the amount of revenue brought in by his estate, he did not state the facts, but concealed them. So pious a man would not, I was sure, have so forsworn himself, had he not known that “ suppression ” 2 was permissible before 1 A personage of importance in the period of anarchy which followed on the death of Muqtadir. 2 A technical term ordinarily used of the concealment of one’s religious opinions when there is danger of persecution. Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 123 one from whom injury was to be feared.—It was as though he had made ‘Ali b. Tsa swallow a stone. % Let us resume the report of the dealings between ‘Ali b. Tsa and Ibn al-Furat. Muqtadir declined to deliver ‘Ali b. Tsa to Ibn al-Furat, while ‘Ali b. Tsa maintained that he would be unable to pay his fine until he had left the Palace. Twice he was summoned by MuAassin, who demanded payment of him, at first gently ; but the ex-vizier paid no more than the price of a house which he sold. He was then put in fetters by MuAassin, on seeing which Nasr left the room. MuAassin repeated his demands, when ‘Ali b. Tsa replied : If I could pay the money here, I should have escaped the fetters.—MuAas- sin had a woollen jubbah put upon him, but he held his ground ; thereupon MuAassin cuffed him ten times, at which Nazuk rose to leave, and when asked by MuAassin whither he was going, replied that he could not endure to be present at the torture of this shaikh. ‘Ali b. Tsa was then sent back to his prison ; but when Ibn al-Furat heard how MuAassin had treated him, he was alarmed and told his son that he had seriously compromised them by his action ; he ought not to have gone beyond ( 111 ) the fetters. He proceeded to write to Muqtadir, inter¬ ceding for ‘Ali b. Tsa, stating that when he heard of what had happened to him it had grieved him more than any¬ thing which he could remember, and that he had touched no food since he learned of it; for ‘Ali b. Tsa was one of the most distinguished of the clerks, had served the Commander of the Faithful, and was an inmate of his Palace, which fact should have rendered his person sacred ; such a man could indeed make mistakes, but it would be worthy of the Commander of the Faithful to forgive. Finally he begged that the fetters and the woollen jubbah might be removed.—Muqtadir replied that ‘Ali b. Tsa deserved many times what he had got, and that MuMssin’s treatment of him was quite right; still, he accepted the intercession of Ibn al-Furat, was 124 A.H. 311. Caliphate of Muqtadir. giving orders that the fetters should be loosed and the woollen jubbah removed, and had commanded that after this had been done he should be delivered to Ibn al- Furat, that he might pay the advance instalment of his fine.—When 'Ali b. 'Isa was brought to Ibn al-Furat's palace, the latter said he was unwilling to have him in his house, as he was an old man, whom a malady might befall, which would then be ascribed to him ; he there¬ fore requested the Caliph's permission to deliver him to Shafi - 1 When this was told Muqtadir, he answered : I am delivering him to you, because you are vizier, and you are to preserve his life and not to deliver him to Mu^assin ; but about all else consult yourself. So Ibn al-Furat sent and summoned Shafi'. Ibn al-Furat then began to upbraid 'Ali b. 'Isa and complain of his conduct with regard to certain trusts founded by him, which the Caliph had ordered to be restored to him, whereof the money was in part devoted to religious uses, in part to his children and retainers ; what Ali b. Isa had done in the matter, was, he asserted, illicit whether from the point of view of religion or of good behaviour. 2 —'Ali b. 'Isa began to confess that in this matter he had been negligent and requested that his excuse might be accepted. Mu/^assin, who was present, reviled him at great length, on the same subject ; Ali gave him the same reply as he had given his father with some additions, but said in the course of his state¬ ment, Truly , (112) I find you pleasant ! Mu^assin was highly indignant at this expression, and his father also was annoyed by it; MuAassin proceeded to retort with coarse¬ ness, when his father endeavoured to appease and mollify 1 Shafi* Lu'lu’i, as appears from p. 112. 8 The charge is explained in Hilal’s account, p. 303. Assigning property to pious uses was a regular mode of endeavouring to save it in case of disaster to the original owner. The Caliph could frustrate this by revoking the trust. ‘Ali . Isa was charged with delaying so long when he had to deal with Ibn al-Furat’s trusts, that little remained ; probably because the proceeds for some years had already been allotted. y Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 125 him, and then said to 'Ali b. Tsa : Abu AAmad (i.e., MuAassin) is the clerk of the Caliph and the recipient of his favourand began to describe the relation wherein MuAassin stood to the Caliph and how the latter had committed affairs to him.—'Ali b. Tsa began to excuse himself for having used that phrase. After that he rose in company with Shafi', who gave him the seat of honour in his launch and conveyed him home with him. Abu l-Hasan Ibn Abi Hisham 1 stated that he was pre¬ sent on that occasion, and how when #asan, son of Ibn al-Furat and Daulah, came out at the time he saw 'Ali b. Isa rise and kiss him on the head and eyes. Ibn al-Furat thought that was going too far, and said to him : You must not do that, Abud-i^asan ; he is your own son ! Then, opening his ink-holder, he wrote an order upon his collector Harun b. Tmran to pay Abul-tfasan 'Ali b. Isa without any demand two thousand dinars as a help towards his fine. He then told his son Mufessin to give an order of the same sort himself. He made one out for a thousand dinars. They then summoned Bishr b. Harun, who made out a receipt in favour of 'Ali b. Tsa of three thousand dinars of his fine. 'Ali b. Tsa then departed expressing his gratitude. Ali b. Tsa declined to accept the aid of any of his clerks towards his fine, though all offered and indeed transmitted contributions according to their means * except from Ibn Farajawaihi, and from Fa^l and //usain, the sons of Ibn al-Furat ; from each of these he accepted five hundred dinars. Abu’l-Haija Ibn //amdan sent ten thousand dinars, but they were de¬ clined by Ali b. Isa, who replied that if the donor were governor of Fars, 2 they would have been accepted ; but that, knowing they represented his whole fortune, he was unwilling to ruin him.—Abu’l-Haija vowed- that the 1 Probably a brother of the person mentioned p. 109. 1 He was in charge of the Khorasan Road, supra, p. 75, probably a less lucrative appointment. ¥ r ’ 126 A.H. 311. Caliphate of Muqtadir. money should not come back to his purse, so it was dis¬ tributed among the descendants of Abu Talib, and in charity to the disabled.— Shafi' Lu’lu’i offered two thousand dinars, but ‘Ali b. ‘Isa declined to accept them, saying : I cannot impose upon you the double burden of entertaining me and helping me with my fine. He accepted (113) contributions from Harun b. Gharib and Shafi', freedman of Muqtadir. When ‘Ali b. ‘Isa had paid the greater part of his fine, Ibn al-Furat pointed out to Muqtadir that it was unde¬ sirable that he should remain in Shafi 0 s house for his own sake, since rumour was already rife 1 ; and if he were sent back to the Palace, rumour would be yet more busy. He therefore requested permission to remove him to Meccah. This was granted by Muqtadir, and Ibn al-Furat assigned seven thousand dirhems to him for journey-money and other needs. ‘Ali b. ‘Isa started for Meccah ; but the vizier presently wrote ordering him to be removed to San'a in Yemen, and this was done. Ibn al-Furat then proceeded to exact huge sums from ‘Ali b. ‘Isa's dependents, clerks and agents, by the use of torture ; he gave a free hand to his son Mu/?assin, and people failed to recognize in the character which he displayed the generosity for which he had been famous. Abu ‘Ali Ibn Muqlah indeed wrote a letter to Abu ‘Abdallah Mohammed b. Isma'il b. Zanji, with whom he was on friendly terms, enclosing some verses of his own which I have not reproduced because I do not admire them, and further enclosing a letter to Ibn al-Furat, reminding him of his claims and his former services, which he asked Zanji to convey to Ibn al-Furat; when the vizier read it, he ordered that his fetters should be loosed, and that his fine should be fixed at a sum which he could bear. Afterwards he reduced even this and released him. * Probably that he was to be made vizier again. Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 127 Ibn al-#awari was delivered by Ibn al-Furat to his son MuAassin, who repeatedly cuffed and scourged him, and finally dismissed him to Ahwaz accompanied by an agent who was to exact his fine ; when they reached Ahwaz, this agent put him to death. ( 114 ) The two MadaraT were ordered to be despatched to the metropolis, and Husainb. Ahmad (Abu Zunbur) was conveyed thither, and confined by Ibn al-Furat in his palace ; thither the judges and heads of bureaux were summoned, and MuAassin too was present. They pro¬ duced assessments that they had drawn up for Abu Zunbur, who was examined by Ibn al-Furat about them, and on the ground of certain matters which had formed the subject of his questions, was made to give a bond for 2,400,000 dinars. Presently Ibn al-Furat thought this sum too large, and fixed his fine at 1,700,000. He showed Muqtadir Abu Zunbur's bond for the amount, and the Caliph approved his action. Ibn al-Furat pro¬ ceeded to treat him with the utmost kindness, expressing admiration for his ability and eulogizing his intellect. He had never spoken, he said, to any official who was more intelligent or courageous. He desired Abu Zunbur to state in the presence of 'Ali b. Tsa that the latter had received secret profits from him during his presidency of the Bureau of the West and during his vizierate. He begged to be excused. Ibn al-Furat asked why he re¬ refused in the case of ‘Ali b. Tsa what he had done in his own (Ibn al-Furat's). 1 He replied that he was not proud of what he had then done, and that it had won no-one's approval, in spite of the evident unfriendliness of the vizier in delivering him to Ibn Bistam, and giving that official power over him in his second vizierate ; how then would they approve of his doing the same in the case of ‘Ali b. Tsa, who had befriended him both of old and recently ? So Ibn al-Furat did not insist. 1 ^\bove, p. 61. 128 A.H. 311. Caliphate of Muqtadir. Then Mohammed b. ‘Ali Madara’i was brought. He had held no office during the vizierate of JTamid ( 115 ) b. ‘Abbas, so he was questioned by Ibn al-Furat with refer¬ ence to the arrears due from him and #usain b. A/rniad (his cousin) on the revenues of. the Armies of Syria and Egypt, and the claims of the treasury on him as revenue- farmer, he having been at the time partner of his brother iTusain b. A/rniad in the contract.—He defended himself on certain points, when Ibn al-Furat told him that he was not a cleverer man than his brother Husain, who had attempted a more elaborate defence and had been unable to maintain it. So without torture or threats he ob¬ tained his bond for 1,700,000 dinars, and then handed him over to the care of MuAassin, in whose house he was absolutely secure, but he remained there only one day ; MuAassin treated him disdainfully at their interview, but proceeded to release him. The reason for this was that he brought MuAassin a great amount of money, handsome raiment, precious jewels and beautiful slaves. Account of Ibn al-Furat’s plot to remove Mu’nis from the capital. After a brilliant victory over the Byzantines Mu’nis had returned from his expedition, and had been met by Muhassin, Nasr the Chamberlain, Shafi‘, Muflih, and the other captains, and had been received by Muqtadir. It was the common talk that Mu’nis expressed disapproval of the tortures inflicted upon the clerks and officials by Ibn al-Furat and Mu^assin, and of the death of #amid which had been made public ; and that the disbanded cavalry 1 in the capital were intriguing to join the army of Mu’nis the Mu^affar in order that they might earn pay. This annoyed Ibn al-Furat, so a week after the arrival of Mu’nis he had a private interview with Muq¬ tadir, wherein he informed him of the design of Mu’nis to attach the troops to himself, and that if he succeeded 1 The guards of the Palace. Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 129 in this design he would become Prince of Princes, 1 having control of the whole empire ; especially as the captains and the retainers were prepared to obey his orders. Ibn al-Furat insisted on the danger involved, and endeavoured to exasperate Muqtadir against Mu’nis ; so when Mu’nis rode to the Palace, Muqtadir said to him in the presence of Ibn al-Furat : There is nothing I should like better than that you should remain here, for besides (116) the pleasure* which I find in your society and the good luck which the sight of you brings, I feel the advan¬ tage of your presence in all the business of the empire. Only the pay demanded by the cavalry as disbanded troops is immense, and it is impossible to pay it or indeed half their earnings regularly; they would not obey orders to go to the districts of Syria or Egypt, alleging that they cannot afford to do it. You are aware that Rayy, Abhar and Zanjan are closed against us by the brother of Su'luk, 2 while Armenia and Adharbaijan are also closed by Yusuf Ibn Abi’l-Saj. If you remain in Baghdad, these men will require permission to be attached to you ; if I decline, they will mutiny and cause disorder ; whereas if I assent, none of the revenue of Diyar Rabi'ah and Diyar Muiar, or of Syria will be avail¬ able, whereas that of the Sawad, Ahwaz and Fars will not cover the expenses of the metropolis and of your army. The best course then is that you should proceed to Raqqah, where you will be in the centre of your pro¬ vince, and can despatch your agents to collect the revenue, and exact payment of the vast sums for which the two Madara'i have given their bonds. Further you will be respected by the ministers of public security and of kharaj in Egypt and Syria, and the prosperity of the empire will be secured.—Muqtadir therefore ordered him 1 This seems to be the first occurrence of this title, which was first actually adopted by Ibn Ra'iq. We have seen that Hamid contemplated taking the position. 2 In 310 these provinces had been given to Ibn Abi’l-Saj. Apparently " Su'luH’s ” rebellion must have begun in 300, 130 A.H. 311. Caliphate of Muqtadir. to proceed to Raqqah with all the H ujari and the Saji retainers under his orders. Mu'nis understood that this was a plot of Ibn al-Furat, whose hostility to himself he thus perceived. He re¬ quested and obtained permission to remain in Baghdad for the remainder of Ramadan, and keep the feast 1 there ; after the feast he went to pay a farewell visit to Ibn al-Furat, who rose from his seat to his full height to receive him ; Mu'nis remonstrated. Ibn al-Furat ad¬ jured him to seat himself on the same carpet, but he refused. Mu'nis preferred a number of requests, all of which were granted. When Mu'nis was about to leave his presence he wished to rise again, only Mu'nis adjured him by the Caliph's head not to do so. Then he went to bid farewell to the Caliph and proceeded to his camp, the day being rainy. 2 ( 117 ) Plans of Ibn al-Furat for dealing with the courtiers . When Ibn al-Furat had finished fining the clerks, and banished Mu'nis, he proceeded to attempt the arrest of Nasr the Chamberlain, and Shafi' freedman of Muq¬ tadir. He gave Muqtadir an account of the wealth and estates in the possession of Nasr in particular, of the vast revenue which he obtained from the offices which he held, and of his various sources of secret profit. Muqtadir agreed to put Nasr in the vizier's power, but when Nasr heard of this, he implored the protection of the Queen-mother, who spoke to her son as follows. Ibn al-Furat, she said, has removed from your neighbourhood Mu'nis, your sword and stay ; he now wants to ruin your Chamber- lain in order to get you into his power and requite you for your treatment of him, your confiscation of his goods and dishonouring his women. On whom, I should like to know, will you call for aid if he mean mischief, and plot your dethronement ? Especially as he has displayed 1 The first day of the following month, Jan. 12, 924 * Mu nis afterwards mentioned this in his complaint against the vizier. Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 131 such malice and let his son MuAassin commit every atrocity.—Nasr had already gone home, had prepared for emergencies by distributing his wealth in deposits, and then gone into hiding, when he received a message from the Queen-mother bidding him return home. He trusted this sufficiently to obey it; and he humbled him¬ self to the ground before Ibn al-Furat and his son. Ibn al-Furat continued to instruct Muqtadir about his affairs, stating that he had tampered with the allegiance of Ibn Abi’l-Saj and thereby lost to the empire five million dinars of revenue from his provinces. He hoped thereby to make Muqtadir think seriously of delivering Nasr into the vizier’s power. In Dhu’l-#ijjah of this year 1 news reached Ibn al- Furat that Ibn Abi’l-Saj had defeated and killed Ahmad b. ‘Ali brother of Su’luk, and having decapitated him proposed sending the head to Baghdad. Mu/zassin rode to the Palace, and having requested Muflih to bring him to the Caliph where Nasr was not present, and ob¬ tained this request, told Muqtadir the good news of the victory, informing him at the same time that Nasr was displeased thereat, being an enemy of Ibn Abi’l-Saj, and the person who had induced him to rebel. That, he said, was why he kept the news from him. Year 312. (118) Some days later in an apartment belonging to the Queen-mother, but frequently used by the Caliph when he sat with her, there appeared on the roof of one of the rooms a Persian in fine apparel with a woollen shirt under it and next his skin, and having in his possession an ink- horn, firesteel, knife, set of reed-pens, paper, porridge, and rope ; he was said to have come in with the workmen and so got into that place, where having remained some days he had suffered thirst, so that he came out in quest of water ; being caught and asked his business, he said 1 Began March 11, 924^ 132 A.H. 312. Caliphate of Muqtadir. he could not speak to any one but the master of the house. He was brought before the vizier, Ibn al-Furat, who said to him : I represent the master of the house, so say what you wish.—The man said : No, I must see him in person, and ask him about what I want.—The vizier was at first gentle with him, but it was useless, and when other means had failed, the attendants tried to make him confess by blows and violence ; he then changed from Arabic into Persian, saying nadanam (I know not), and merely repeating this phrase in reply to all that was said to him. He was then removed from the apartment and tortured to death, still confining himself to nadanam. He was then impaled, wrapped in hempen cords and flock, smeared with naphtha, and set on fire. Ibn al-Furat addressed Nasr the Chamberlain on the subject of this person in Muqtadir's presence. I fancy, he said, you would not approve of such a thing happening in your own house as has happened to the Commander of the Faithful, while you are his chamberlain and the guardian of his residence. Such a thing as this has never befallen a Caliph, in either ancient or modern times. Without doubt this man was an adherent of Ahmad b. ‘Ali brother of Su‘luk. This is proved by his being a Persian. Either then AAmad b. ‘Ali before he was killed arranged with you that you should introduce him into this place, ( 119 ) or you yourself suborned him to assassi¬ nate the Commander of the Faithful owing to your apprehension of danger to yourself from that quarter, to your enmity against Ibn Abi’l-Saj, your friendship towards A/rniad b. ‘Ali and the vast sums which have come to you from him.— Nasr the Chamberlain replied : I wonder whether I am plotting against the Sultan be¬ cause he confiscated my property, dishonoured my women, or seized my estates or imprisoned me for ten years ?—Muqtadir said : If this had happened to one of the common people it would have been an outrage.— Ibn al-Furat had got Nasr into his power, but the danger Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 133 was averted from him by the news which arrived of the sufferings of the Pilgrims at the hands of the Qarmarian, to be narrated presently, which occupied Ibn al-Furat with his own affairs. Nasr’s cause was strengthened thereby, and he was saved from Ibn al-Furat. This year came the despatch concerning Ibn Abi’l- Saj’s expedition from Adharbaijan to Rayy, his war against A/miad b. ‘Ali, and his sending the latter’s head and trunk to Baghdad. In this year too Ibn al-Furat assigned moneys to students of literature, and writers of the Tradition. The reason for this was that they formed the subject of a conversation in his reception-room, and some one said : Very likely one of these students stints himself a silver danaq 1 or less to spend it on paper and ink.—Ibn al- Furat was a man of wide sympathies and amiable char¬ acter, and had made a distribution of money to the poets ; so when he heard about these persons, he said : I am the man to assist them in their pursuits, and assigned them twenty thousand dirhems for this expense. It has been stated that Ibn al-Furat had no precedent in this matter save what is recorded by Z)aba‘i 2 after his authorities, how Maslamah b. ‘Abd al-Malik 3 at his death bequeathed one third of the third at his disposal 4 to students (120) of literature, on the ground that they were hardly treated. Every day there w r as used in the kitchen of Ibn al- Furat a quantity of meat and in his apartments an amount of ice never used in one man’s establishment before or since ; and the same is to be said of the drinks which were offered to all comers, and of the wax and of the paper. 5 When he became vizier the prices of wax, 1 The sixth part of a dirhem, about l£d. •Many traditionalists are mentioned having this relative-name. •Son of the Umayyad Caliph, often mentioned by Tabari and in the Aghani. 4 A Moslem may not bequeath more. The other two-thirds go to various relations in fixed fractions. ‘ Hilal gives statistics. 134 A.H. 312. Caliphate of Muqtadir. ice and especially paper rose, and they fell when he was cashiered. Similarly he had given to Mu'nis the Miu- affar, on the occasion of his home-coming from the West, and to Bushra, Yalbaq, Nazuk, and other freedmen and attendants of the court when the Persian New Year's Day came presents of a size to which no man's liberality had risen before. His hope was thereby to mitigate their hostility ; but they had not the desired effect. Reasons for the decline of Ibn al-Furat’s power after it had reached its zenith . News were brought to Ibn al-Furat in Baghdad that Abu Tahir Ibn Abi Sa'id Jannabi had come to Habir to meet the pilgrims of the year 311 on their return ; and had attacked a caravan containing numerous pilgrims from Baghdad and other places. News of Abu Tahir's arrival had reached the pilgrims when they were at Faid ; so they waited there until the stores of the people there were exhausted and the place could no longer hold them ; when they continued their march. They were advised by Abu l-Haija 'Abdallah b. TTamdan, guardian of the Kufah and Meccah roads and protector of the pilgrims, when the news of the raider from Hajar reached them, to let him take them by a side road from Faid to Wadi'l- Qura that they might not pass by Habir. They however made an outcry at this proposal and refused. So they marched and he of necessity with them (121) to Habir. When they approached this place they were met and attacked by Abu Tahir Ibn Abi Sa'id Jannabi, who defeated them, slew a great number of them, and took prisoner Abu'l-Haija ‘Abdallah b. Hamdan, Ahmad b. Kashmard, Nihrir ‘Umari, Ahmad b. Badr, paternal uncle of the Queen-mother (Muqtadir's mother), and a number of men and women belonging to the Sultans household. Abu Tahir seized the pilgrims camels from all the caravans, and took captive such men, women and children as he chose, conveying them to Hajar. He left the rest of the pilgrims Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 135 where they were, without food or camels, so that most of them died of thirst, sore feet and over-walking. Abu Tahir's age was at the time seventeen. On both sides of the river Baghdad and its streets were in a ferment. Women came out barefoot, with dis¬ hevelled hair, beating their faces till they were black, and shrieking in the roads. They were joined by the women of the ruined officials—ruined by Ibn al-Furat. This was Saturday 7 Safar (May 15, 924). The spectacle was of unexampled hideousness. Ibn al-Furat ordered Nazuk to ride to the public mosques on both sides of the river on account of the public commotion. He did this taking with him all his troops, cavalry, infantry and naphtha-shooters, and succeeded in quieting the mob. Then there arrived the first detachment of pilgrims, who explained the situation to Ibn al-Furat, and he at the end of the same day rode to Muqtadir, though feeling his courage fail him, and recounted the tale ; the Caliph summoned Nasr the Chamberlain to take part in the consultation, and he, getting the opportunity of address¬ ing Ibn al-Furat in the Caliph's presence, attacked him fiercely, saying : Now you are asking What is to be done ? after having shaken the columns of the empire and ex¬ posed it to destruction by removing Mu'nis, its champion, the man who combated its foes. Who will now rescue ( 122 ) the throne from this person ? Who but you has betrayed the Sultan’s troops, captains, and the men and women of his household to the Qarmadans ? The affair of the Persian who was found in the Sultan's apartment is now cleared up ; he must have been an adherent of the Qarmadan.—Nasr advised Muqtadir to write at once and summon Mu'nis to the capital. The Caliph ordered a letter to be written to that effect. The mob assaulted Ibn al-Furat, throwing brickbats at his barge. MuAassin, riding from his dwelling to his barge, was also stoned. The mob shouted in the streets that Ibn al-Furat was the Great Qarmadan, and that nothing would satisfy 136 A.H. 312. Caliphate of Muqtadir. him but the annihilation of the people of Mohammed. The populace was violently agitated, and kept away from public prayer in the mosques that day ; the dis¬ order spread over all Baghdad on both sides of the river. Ibn al-Furat advised that Yaqut be sent to guard Kufah in case the raiders from Hajar should return, and take with him the H ujari retainers, with the chief captains. If the raider from Hajar declined to move, Yaqut should take the offensive against him. Muqtadir gave Yaqut the necessary order, bidding Ibn al-Furat see to his equipment. The vizier undertook to furnish enormous sums to him and his two sons, Muzaffar and Mohammed, increasing their fiefs and table-allowances, as well as to those who were attached to them. Yaqut encamped at the Kunasah Gate, but news reaching Ibn al-Furat that the raider from Hajar had returned to his own country, the vizier ordered Yaqut back, and his proposed expedition to Kufah was abandoned. Muqtadir effected a reconciliation between Ibn al- Furat and Nasr, bidding every one unite in support of the empire and in resisting the raider from Hajar. Mu'nis entered Baghdad and was met by the inhabitants ; no-one missing the occasion. Ibn al-Furat sailed to greet him, contrary to his custom and that of his predecessors. When Mu'nis knew of his arrival, he came to the gate of his house, to meet him, and begged him to withdraw; he declined to do so, and came up out of his barge to congratulate Mu’nis on his return. When Ibn al-Furat left the house to depart, Mu nis accompanied him (123) until he stepped down to his barge. Muhassin’s treatment of the discharged officials when adversity befell him and his father. After the attack on the pilgrims by the raider from Hajar MuAassin became anxious about the discharged officials, fearing the revelation of the secret profits which he had accepted, and the deductions which he had made Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 137 from their fines and pocketed himself. He therefore took into his employ Abu Ja'far Mohammed b. ‘Ali Shalmaghani, known by the name Ibn Abi’l-'Azaqir, a man who claimed that the deity abode in him as had been claimed by flallaj. He had previously favoured this person and made him deputy in Baghdad to various officials. He had a friend from Basrah, known to be his associate and ready to shed blood. To this Basran friend of Ibn Abid-'Azaqir MuAassin delivered a number of persons, including Nu'man b. ‘Abdallah, 1 ‘Abd al-Wahhab b. Ma Sha Allah, and Mu’nis eunuch of #amid, ostensibly to exact from them the arrears of their fines. When they were in his hands he slaughtered them like so many sheep. A number of persons who were in hiding received kindly letters from Ibn al-Furat, which induced them to show themselves ; they were then fined and made to pay vast sums. Account of the arrest of Ibn al-Furat and the flight of his son Muhassin. Rumour became rife about the impending fall of Ibn al-Furat, so that his sons and clerks went into hiding, and Muqtadir sent him a message through Nasim. Abu’l-Qasim Ibn Zanji states that he was present when Nasim came, and was brought into his apartment, and delivered the message with which he had been charged. I heard Ibn al-Furat say in reply (he says) : ( 124 ) Tell him : You know, O Commander of the Faithful, how I in the process of securing your rights have incurred the enmity of the small and the great, and have exacted money for you from humble and noble ; I have done my utmost to secure your dynasty ; I have considered no- one so long as I retained your confidence, and so long as the course followed secured me your goodwill and good opinion. Do not accept the statements about me of those who wish to remove me from your service, and would provoke you to unprofitable measures and such as 1 Above, p. 32. 138 A.tt. 312. Caliphate OF MUQTADIR. will be detrimental in their results. Further our horo¬ scopes are identical, so whatever befalls me, the like will befall you. Pay no attention to what is said ; for the court and the public are aware that I made greater out¬ lay on the troops despatched to the Meccah Road than any of my predecessors, that I selected commanders and officers for the army and brave men to be the troops, and that I provided all that was asked of me for their equipment. God decreed that the same disaster should happen to the pilgrims as happened in the days of Muktafi. 1 He did not blame his vizier for it nor make him endure the consequences or even think the worse of him on account of it.—He said some more to the same effect, and Nasim retired, accompanied by the retainers. Rumour became yet more persistent about the im¬ pending fate of Ibn al-Furat and his son Mu/^assin, until Muqtadir, wishing to silence it, wrote a letter wherein he swore to the continuance of his sentiments towards them and his confidence in them, and told them they might rely on his determination to befriend them. He further commanded them to show his letter to them publicly in Baghdad, and have copies sent to all ministers of war and finance in the provinces. After this in the month Rabid 2 of the year 312, when Ibn al-Furat and MuAassin had sailed to the Palace and had an audience of Muqtadir, as they were leaving, Nasr the Chamberlain requested them to sit down, (125) for the H ujari retainers had been petitioning Muqtadir for their arrest, and their petition had been delivered by Muflih, who however advised delay, pointing out to the Caliph that to dismiss a vizier owing to the statements of his enemies was dangerous and bad policy, and an encouragement to the retainers to interfere in affairs of state, Muqtadir therefore bade him order Nasr to release them, yet to inform the retainers that the wishes 1 a.h. 294 a Qarmadan force inflicted a similar blow on the pilgrim caravan. 2 Began June 7, 924. Third Vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. 139 expressed in their communication should be respected. MufliA came to bid the vizier depart, and Nasr gave him and his son permission to do so. So Ibn al-Furat rose and began to race through the passages, until he reached his barge, as also did his son MuAassin, and when they had had come to the vizier’s palace MuAassin had a long private interview with his father ; after which he left and went to his own residence whence, after staying a little time and giving some orders, he departed and went into hiding. His father took his place in his office with an untroubled air, and attended to business, being attended by the chief secretaries, who left at the end of the day, feeling some doubt as to the accuracy of the reports which had reached them, owing to the gaiety and nonchalance displayed by the vizier, who had talked and joked as usual, and given or refused orders in his customary style. One of his personal friends afterwards stated that late in the night he had heard Ibn al-Furat repeating in his bed the verse Prudent as he was, that morning he knew not whether it was better to advance or to retire. —a proof that he kept awake that night thinking about his fortunes. Next day (says Abu’l-Qasim Ibn Zanji) he went to the office to attend to business, and presently there arrived a thin note sealed ; which he read. I did not at the time know from whom it was, but learned afterwards that it was from Muflih. Then there arrived another letter from a sort of soldier attached to the Palace ; when he read it, he hesitated for a moment and then summoned his steward Yahya, and whispered something into his ear ; the steward then departed. The vizier proceeded to dismiss the clerks, promising to come early the next day. He then rose from his seat and went in the direction of his private apartments, whilst the clerks separated. When I had got to the doorway, I recollected a task (126) which he had assigned me, so I went back and sat down to perform it. Sud¬ denly I saw that Nazuk had entered armed with his 140 A.H. 312. Caliphate of Muqtadir. sword, and with a stiletto in his hand, followed by Yalbaq. The demeanour of the two was unlike their usual cheerfulness, and each of them was accompanied by some fifteen armed retainers. Not finding the vizier in his office, they went into his private apartments, whence they brought him out uncovered ; he was forced into a barge and conveyed to the house of Nazuk; at the same time his two sons Fa^l and ifusain, and such clerks of his as were found, were arrested. Nazuk and Yalbaq proceeded to inform Mu'nis the Muzaffar of what had happened ; he had come out to the Shammasiyyah Gate, ostensibly for an excursion, accompanied by Hilal b. Badr and a number of his officers. Yalbaq then proceeded to the residence of Nazuk and brought out thence Ibn al-Furat with his two sons and his dependents, Nazuk having taken from his house a spangled silk cloak to throw over the head of the vizier, who was uncovered when seized. When Ibn al- Furat saw Muffiis, he made show of gratification at finding himself in the latter s power. Mu'nis made Ibn al-Furat sit beside him in his barge, and addressed him with civility, though remonstrating with him for his behaviour. Ibn al-Furat humiliated himself, and gave him the title Ustadh. Mu'nis retorted : You call me Ustadh now, but only yesterday you sent me into exile at Raqqah, with the rain pouring on my head, and told our lord the Commander of the Faithful that I was plotting to ruin the empire !—The barge descended the river to the Palace, whither Mu’nis ordered Ibn al- Furat's two sons and his dependents also to be conveyed, to be put in the custody of Nasr. The populace were furious against Ibn al-Furat, and were joined by the dependents of the cashiered officials, who cursed him with loud cries. Mu'nis tried hard to restrain them, but was unable to do so ; they pelted his barge owing to Ibn al-Furat being there, and called out: The great Qarmafian has been arrested, there only 141 VlZIERATE OF Abu'L-QaSIM KhAQANI. remains the little Qarmarian. 1 When they reached the Private Gate of the Palace, a number of people came up out of the boats, intending to pelt Ibn al-Furat, his two sons, and his clerks with brickbats. Force had to be used against them, and it was necessary to shoot them with arrows, whereby some of them were wounded. The assailants then retired, and Nasr took charge of the prisoners. ( 127 ) The duration of this third vizierate of Ibn al- Furat was ten months and eighteen days. The chief captains then assembled in the Palace, and insisted that if Ibn al-Furat were to be confined in the Palace, they would go in a body to the Oratory. 2 They used violent threats ; so Muqtadir summoned Mu'nis and Nasr to a consultation, and they advised him to mollify the officers by removing Ibn al-Furat from the Palace, and delivering him to ShafT Lu'luT, who was to imprison him in his house. So Shafi' was summoned and given custody of the prisoner. Account of the process whereby 'Abdallah b. Mohammed b/Ubaidallah Khaqani attained the vizierate. Abu'l-Qasim 'Abdallah b. Mohammed Khaqani had gone into hiding during the third vizierate of Ibn al-Furat. His father, Abu ‘Ali, was very old, ill, and imbecile ; when owing to the disaster which had befallen the pilgrims Ibn al-Furat’s position was weakened, Abu’l-Qasim Khaqani plotted against him and his son MuAassin, offering an estimate of what he could make them disgorge 3 ; and his efforts were aided by Nasr the Chamberlain and Thumal the Stewardess, with others. Mu'nis had previously suggested his name for the vizierate, but had been told by Muqtadir that this man's father had ruined the world, and that the son was worse than the father; Husain b. Ahmad MadaraT 1 Doubtless meaning MuAassin. 2 This, as has been seen, meant mutiny. 8 This appears to be the sense, 142 A.H. 312. Caliphate of Muqtadir. was the Caliph's own nominee, but Mu'nis objected that he had departed for Egypt and it would take too long to bring him to the capital. The younger Khaqani was further supported by Nasr and Harun b. Gharib ; so Muqtadir summoned him, and in a personal audience offered him the vizierate and the presidency of the bureaux. A robe of honour was then conferred upon him and Mu'nis the Mu^affar with Harun b. Gharib accompanied him to his residence. Account of what happened to Ibn al-Furat and his dependents after the assumption of the vizierate by Abu’l-Qasim Khaqani. Abu'l-iZasan (Ibn Abi Hisham) narrates how after Ibn al-Furat had been delivered to Shafk in the manner described, the latter sent his clerk known as al-Jamal (The Camel) to negotiate with him about the amount of the fine which he was prepared to pay in order to be secured against his enemies, (128) and escape delivery into the hands of Khaqani and Abu'l 'Abbas Ibn Ba'ud Sharr his secretary.—Ibn al-Furat replied that before making an offer he must receive a guarantee from Muq¬ tadir that his person should not be delivered to any individual of that class. Then he said to the clerk known as The Camel ” : Tell your master that I have left in the hands of Harun the Collector and his son 160,000 dinars odd which have come into their possession from the fines. His purpose was that this might be known to the Caliph, who would order the money to be conveyed to his private Treasury forthwith, and lest the new vizier might lead the Caliph to suppose that he had himself obtained the sum, and proceed to expend it on objects of which the cost was ordinarily defrayed from the public Treasury. Shah' embarked at once and com¬ municated this to Muqtadir, who sent to the two collectors ; these were found in the residence of Khaqani, who had been too much occupied in receiving congratula¬ tions to speak to them ; being summoned they admitted VlZIERATE OF Abu'l-QaSIM KhAQANI. 143 possession of the money, which they transmitted to the private Treasury, where it was duly certified. Muqtadir then ordered Nasr to deliver Ibn al-Furat's sons, clerks and dependents to Khaqani; he did so, re¬ ceiving a receipt from the vizier, who delivered them to Abu'l-'Abbas Ibn Ba'ud Sharr ; this person put them in fetters and made them sit on the ground in the intense heat; he then received the bond of each of Ibn al-Furat's two sons for 100,000 dinars, and that of Sa'id b. Ibrahim for 200,000 dinars ; and that of MuAassin's clerk Abu Ghanim for 200,000 dinars. Criers were ordered to demand the appearance of Mu/zassin, Hisham, and the two sons of Farajawaihi, and to threaten all in whose houses they were found after the proclamation, with the plunder and burning of their dwellings and a thou¬ sand stripes. Ibn al-Furat arranged ( 129 ) with Shaft' that the latter should guarantee a sum to be paid by him on condition that he be sent back to the Palace and be not put into any one's power. Shaft/ communicated this proposal to Muqtadir, who told him that Mu'nis, Nasr and Harun b. Gharib were agreed that Khaqani could not proceed unless Ibn al-Furat were put in his power ; and that he had undertaken to obtain from him, his son, and his dependents two millions of dinars. Shaft* with¬ drew from the imperial presence and sent his clerk to Ibn al-Furat to explain the case. This clerk (whose sobriquet was " the Camel '') afterwards made the follow¬ ing statement :—I was in the habit (he said) of visiting Ibn al-Furat daily to enquire into his condition, and I found him the stoutest-hearted of mankind, and the most resigned to misfortune. He asked me who had assumed the vizierate ; when I replied that Abu’l-Qasim Ibn Abi 'Ali Khaqani had done so, he exclaimed : It is the Sultan who has had a fall, not I.—Then he asked who was president of the Bureau ( i.e . that of the Sawad) ; when I replied : Mohammed b. Ja'far b. Hafs, he said : The man's hit with hi$ own stone.—Then he asked whQ 144 A.H. 312. Caliphate of Muqtadir. had become presidents of the remaining bureaux ; when I replied : Yahya b. Nu'aim Maliki, Mohammed b. Ya'qub Misri, and Ishaq b. 'Ali Qunna’i, he said : Certainly God is helping this vizier with competent men. Ibn al-Furat's examiner was Ibn Ba'ud Sharr, who dealt gently with him and held out hopes in order to make make him recollect and reveal his deposits. After a course of this treatment Ibn al-Furat admitted that he had lodged with certain traders 150,000 dinars. Now Muqtadir had arranged that the proceeds of the fine of Ibn al-Furat only should be transmitted to the private Treasury, whereas those of his dependents should be transmitted to the public Treasury. When the sum mentioned by Ibn al-Furat had been recovered from the traders, Ibn Ba'ud Sharr made a fresh demand on Ibn al-Furat; the ex-vizier replied that he had no money left. The examiner began to apply mild torture, but Ibn ( 130 ) al-Furat was not the man to yield to torture, so he firmly refused to pay anything. Harun b. Gharib then went to Muqtadir and told him that Khaqani had damaged the Sultan's cause by delivering Ibn al-Furat to Ibn Ba'ud Sharr ; he ought to have dealt gently with the ex-vizier and coaxed him, since he was not the man to yield to violence. Muqtadir then ordered Khaqani to have the examination of Ibn al-Furat conducted in Harun b. Gharib's presence, and to deal gently with him. Ibn Ba'ud Sharr had been stinting Ibn al-Furat in the matter of food and drink, sending in to him bread mixed with bran, cucumbers and rain-water. Khaqani now sent him ample food and drink, with plenty of ice and fruit, apologizing for what had been done and declaring that he had not been aware of the treatment which he had received. Khaqani then sent by Khaqan b. Ahmad b. Yahya a courteously worded and coaxing message, requesting him to make a true statement of his assets, and not defy 145 VIZIERATE OF Abu'L-QaSIM KHAQANI. the Sultan ; for such conduct could not be commended. —His reply was : Tell the vizier from me that I am not an inexperienced novice, who can be cajoled in his examination. I do not say I cannot provide the money ; only when my life is secure, shall I pay ransom for it; and I shall only feel secure when the Commander of the Faithful himself writes me an amnesty, and it is attested by the signatures of the vizier and the judges, and a similar amnesty is written for me by the vizier. Further he must put me in charge of one of two persons, either Mu'nis the Muzaffar, notwithstanding that he is my enemy, or Shafi‘ Lu'luT. If this be not done, then I am resigned to suffer death.—Khaqani sent the follow¬ ing answer : If it were in my power to obtain such a guarantee for you, I would do it; but if I were even to suggest it, I should incur the hostility of the leading men in the empire on your account; further you would not gain anything thereby, as the Caliph has already referred your case to Harun b. Gharib.—A meeting was arranged in the house of Khaqani, when Ibn al-Furat was sum¬ moned, and examined by Ibn Ba'ud Sharr in his pres¬ ence. Ibn al-Furat was immovable, and when Ibn Ba'ud Sharr began to use insulting language, he was reproved by Harun, who asked him whether he hoped by those methods to extract money from Ibn al-Furat. He then proceeded to address the ex-vizier himself, (131) using the most courteous terms. You, he said, know more about affairs than all who are addressing you, among them that the vizier must not defy the Caliph, when the latter is incensed against him.—Ibn al-Furat replied: Prince, advise me; for when a man is in my plight his wits desert him.—Harun continued his examination until he had obtained his bond for a fine of two million dinars, of which the quarter was to be paid at once, that quarter to include what he had already paid, and any sums that might since have been obtained from deposits which he had not revealed. He stipulated 146 A.H. 312. Caliphate of Muqtadir. further that he should be allowed to sell his properties and such of his estates and chattels as found purchasers. He was himself to be transferred to the house of Shafi* or some other person in the confidence of the Sultan, while Kalwadhani should be left in control of his entire property. He was further to be allowed the use of ink to correspond with whom he chose. Harun b. Gharib made him put his name to all this and conveyed the document to Muqtadir. Account of a piece of ill luck which befell Muhassin, and resulted in his being caught , fined and killed. Muhassin had gone into hiding in the house of his mother-in-law, #inzabah, mother of al-Fahl b. Ja'far b. al-Furat , 1 who used to escort him every morning to the cemetery in women’s attire, and bring him back at night to some safe dwelling. One day she had taken him (dressed as usual in female attire) to the Quraish Ceme¬ tery, 2 but when evening came it seemed a long way to Karkh ; one of the women in her company told her of a house belonging to a trustworthy woman, where there was no man, as the woman’s husband had been dead for a year 3 ; thither then iifrnzabah went with her female attendants and MuAassin, and told the mistress of the house that she had with her an unmarried woman who had just returned from a mourners’ gathering, which had greatly depressed her ; would she let this woman have a private apartment ?—The mistress of the house pro¬ vided a room leading out of a corridor, into which she took Muhassin ; she then closed the door after her, and the women sat with Muhassin in the room. Presently a black slave-girl brought a lamp (132) which she placed 1 A distinguished minister who will meet us later; he is ordinarily known as Ibn Hmzabah. Strange, p. 160. This Cemetery was " to the north of the Cemetery of the Martyrs at the tfarb Gate," and towards the river bank, whereas Karkh was south of the city. * A slight exaggeration as appears from what follows. 147 VlZIERATE OF Abu’L-QaSIM .KhAQANI. in the corridor, while ffinzabah came bringing MuAassin some porridge with sugar. MuAassin had by this time removed some of his clothes, and the girl peeping into the room whence neither Mutessin nor #inzabah could see her noticed that it was a man. She went and in¬ formed her mistress ; who after nightfall came and examined the room and saw Mu/^assin. It was his ill- luck, and evidence that God had forsaken him, that the woman happened to be the wife of Mohammed b. Nasr, a bailiff of 'Ali b. 'Isa ; this man had been summoned by Mufessin and brought to his office, where he died suddenly of fright at the tortures which he saw ad¬ ministered in MuAassin’s presence before MuAassin had said a word to him. The woman immediately proceeded to the Palace, and, being admitted to see Nasr the Chamberlain, told him the story. He communicated it to Muqtadir, who gave orders that a message should be sent to Nazuk bidding him ride to the place and arrest MuAassin. This order was immediately carried out by him. The arrest was notified by the beating of drums in Baghdad at midnight, which alarmed the inhabitants, who supposed that the Qarmadans had seized the capital. Mu/^assin was conveyed to the vizier’s palace in Muk- harrim, and taken in charge by Ibn Ba'ud Sharr, who immediately had him violently tortured, and obtained his bond for three million dinars. Harun b. Gharib came to this palace and examined MuAassin, holding out hopes in order to make him recollect his deposits and reveal them. For two consecutive days the torture was applied, but Mu/^assin would not yield a single dirhem, declaring that he was not going to lose both his life and his money. After this Harun b. Gharib brought Shafi' Lu’lu’i and summoning MuAassin, the clerks and Ibn Ba'ud Sharr, examined him. After administering severe torture he said to him : Granting that you cannot pay the whole sum for which your bond has been taken, can you not produce 100,000 dinars ?—He replied : ( 133 ) 148 A.H. 312. Caliphate of Muqtadir. I can, provided that you give me time, and that the torture stops.—Harun said : We will give you time, now write your bond for a hundred thousand.—He signed a bond for this amount wherein he agreed to pay it within thirty days.—When Harun b. Gharib read the paper, he exclaimed : Do you suppose you are going to live thirty days !—MuAassin humbly replied that he would do whatever the prince commanded.—Harun bade him write that he would pay it within seven days.—MuAassin asked to have the paper returned to him that he might write another instead, and when he got it, chewed and swallowed it, declining to write another. He was fettered and collared, a woollen jubbah was put upon him, and his head was belaboured with clubs, to induce him to write what he had written before, but he declined. He was sent back to his prison and there exquisitely tor¬ tured, but he declined to yield a dirhem. After this the Ustadh Mu'nis, Nasr the Chamberlain, the judges and clerks presented themselves in the office of the vizier Khaqani, whither Ibn al-Furat was brought, and where he was examined by the vizier Khaqani him¬ self. Khaqani was however no match for Ibn al-Furat who came near “ making mince meat of him/' Thus Khaqani said to Ibn al-Furat : During eleven months you have obtained from your estates a revenue of a million dinars.—Ibn al-Furat replied: These same estates were for ten years in the hands of ‘Ali b. Tsa, during his vizierate and during that of Hamid b. ‘Abbas, and he raised from them no more than 400,000 dinars. You are claiming that I work miracles.—Khaqani said : You attached the dues on the Sultan's lands to those on your own.—Ibn al-Furat replied : The accounts in the bureaux cannot be concealed ; inspect the record for the revenue of the Imperial lands during the time of my control and in the days of ‘Ali b. Tsa, during the vizierate of Hamid b. ‘Abbas, and the vizierate of your father, which you administered yourself; you will see whether VlZIERATE OF Abu'L-QaSIM KhAQANI. 149 during my ministry the revenue of the Imperial lands increased or diminished. He was then examined with reference to the persons whom he had executed, 1 and reproached on their account. He replied : One of ( 134 ) two things must be the case. Either it is asserted that I killed them myself ;—now I have not been away from the capital, so that their death cannot be ascribed to me, as the persons with whose death I am charged were at a distance from it. Or it is asserted that I wrote to order their execution. In that case I put myself in the hands of the officials, ministers of public security, trusted counsellors of the Sultan, officers of the kharaj, chief governors of provinces. 2 — The reply to this was : Your son killed them.—He answered : I am not the same as my son, and you are examining me. —Ibn Ba'ud Sharr 3 retorted : If your son slew these people, then you slew them.—Ibn al-Furat replied : That is contrary to the ruling of God and of His Apostle. God says : No bearer shall bear the burden of another , 4 and the Prophet said to one of his Com¬ panions : Is this your son ? The answer was in the affirmative. The Prophet then said : You will not be responsible for him nor he for you. 5 And besides this he is in your hands, so you can ask him. If he is liable to retaliation for a charge of murder committed in a place whence he was at a distance, but where some one else is said to have acted for him, the law on this matter is well known. 6 The people were bewildered by this reply ; however ‘Uthman b. Sa'id, president of the Bureau of the Army, said to Nasr the Chamberlain : If the Chamberlain 1 The reference is to the persons killed by Shalmaghani's friend, above, p. 123. 2 i.e., to say whether I sent any such orders. 3 One would rather expect Khaqani’s name. 4 Surah vi. 164, and in four other places. 5 Apparently this tradition was invented to illustrate the text. 6 Viz., that retaliation is required in such cases. 150 A.H. 312. Caliphate of Muqtadir. think fit, let him ask Ibn al-Furat the following question : When you used to say to those from whom you demanded money Either you fay, or I shall hand you over to Muh.as- sin, did you mean that Mu/zassin was to feed them on porridge and sugar, or that he was to torture them ? Now he who permits torture permits slaughter, for a man will sometimes die of a single stroke of the lash, not to speak of severer punishments.—Nasr addressed this ques¬ tion to Ibn al-Furat, who replied : The Caliph, whose life God prolong, was Mu/zassin’s patron and I at that time was confined whereas he was at large. Mu/zassin guaranteed what he thought fit, and his proposals passed through the hands of Mufli/i, and various of the Sultan’s counsellors acted as intermediaries. After¬ wards when I became minister, I wanted to deal gently with people, only when I examined them and tried gentle methods, they declined to pay what was due from them ; when they were obstinate I handed them over to the official appointed by the Sultan, and to whom I had been ordered to deliver them. Mu’nis said: You would throw the responsibility for these people's deaths on the Caliph. The Caliph declares that he ordered the death of no-one save only ( 135 ) Ibn al-tfawari. Nasr then addressed him as follows : I have, he said, a message to you from the Sultan to which you are to listen and reply.—Ibn al-Furat asked what it was.— Nasr said : This. I put certain persons into your power because you had guaranteed certain moneys. I desire of you one of two things : either pay me the moneys, or return me the persons. —Ibn al-Furat said : As for the money, it has been duly paid into the Treasury. With regard to the people I never guaranteed their lives nor their con¬ tinuance ; they have died natural deaths.—Mu’nis the Muzaffar then said to him : Suppose that you have a reply and an excuse for everything else ; what excuse have you for exiling me to Raqqah, as though I were an official who had incurred a fine, or an enemy of the 151 VlZIERATE OF Abu’L-QaSIM KhAQANI. Caliph’s house ?—Ibn al-Furat replied : I exiled you ?— Then who did ? he asked.—Our master, he said, ordered you to be sent away.—Our master did not order that, he retorted.—Ibn al-Furat replied : I have a statement in his handwriting. He wrote me a letter, which, being in his own writing I have preserved, wherein he complains of your conduct at various times, of the enormous ex¬ penditure with which you conquer countries which you proceed to un-conquer by your mismanagement and misconduct.—Where is this document ? asked Mu’nis.— In your hands, he replied ; it is among a number of documents which I ordered to be kept in the bamboo case, whereupon there is a statement in my writing that important papers are to be kept there. Among them is the order that you are to be sent away to Raqqah and to be under surveillance until you start.—Khaqani ordered the case to be brought, which was found to bear the seal of Ibn al-Furat, and to contain the actual paper, as well as the other autographs of Muqtadir to which Ibn al-Furat had referred. Of these Khaqani took pos¬ session. Mu’nis immediately demanded an audience of Muqtadir, and requested him to read the letter. Muq¬ tadir was furious and ordered Harun to scourge Ibn al- Furat. The latter was placed in the pillory and received five strokes only. Harun then said to him : Now, my friend, pay up your money.—Ibn al-Furat gave him a bond for 20,000 dinars saying : This is my money. Immediately afterwards he had Mu/^assin brought out of his prison and scourged almost to death ; he how¬ ever refused ( 136 ) to pay anything at all. Harun then went to Muqtadir and requested to be excused from further examination of Ibn al-Furat and his son ; for, he said, these are people who have no intention of paying anything and have made up their minds to be killed.— Muqtadir ordered them to be delivered to Nazuk, who tortured them mercilessly. On Mutessin he inflicted a variety of torments, till his body putrefied and nothing 152 A.H. 312. Caliphate of Muqtadir. remained to torture. He whipped Ibn al-Furat three times with stout ropes, but the ex-vizier would not yield a dirhem. Muqtadir lost patience with Abu’l-Qasim Khaqani, the vizier, and complained that he had seen none of the money which the vizier had promised to ex¬ tract from Ibn al-Furat and his son.—Khaqani answered that it was because the case had not been left to diplo- macy, when Ibn al-Furat had been withdrawn from examination by men of his own profession and handed over to the swordsmen, he had despaired of his life, and so resolved to save his money. His son, seeing his con- duct, had followed his example. Nazuk told Muqtadir that he had gone to the utmost length in administering torture to the two, so much so that the body of the fastidious Mu/zassin was putrefying, but even so he had endured unheard-of tortures. Now, he said, for many days he has not tasted food, and only drinks water, being unconscious most of the time._ Muqtadir said : If that be so, the two must be conveyed to my Palace.—Mu’nis and the rest declared that this was the right course, and Khaqani told the Caliph that God was guiding him. After this they left the imperial While they were still in the Palace and before they had parted, Khaqani whispered to them: If Ibn al- Furat be conveyed to the Palace, his dependents will offer money for his life and that of his son ; and if there¬ by he makes sure of the Caliph and is installed in the Palace, he will reveal his own wealth and obtain security for himself and his son. Once sure of his life he will guarantee us all, 1 and induce the Caliph to put us in his power alluring him with the idea that he will save our L iP f l dS p an i d estates - and amass an enormous sum ■5* th m Ca iP x, S S nefit ' The ri S ht course is ( 137 ) that the officers should swear a common oath that if they ! t e " guarantee the Call P h a vast sum which he undertakes to extract from us. V izierate OF Abu'l-Qasim Khaqani. 153 learn of Ibn al-Furat and his son having been conveyed to the Palace, they will throw off their allegiance.— Mu nis said : Life will not be worth living if this be not done.—Harun b. Gharib and Nazuk undertood the exe¬ cution of the scheme ; they assembled the officers and commanders of the H ujari retainers, and Yalbaq ad¬ ministered the oath to them. The deaths of Ibn al-Fuyat and his son Muhassin. They then presented themselves in a body before Mu nis and Nasr, and revealed what was in their minds. Mu nis suggested that the officers should demand the re¬ moval of Ibn al-Furat and his son to Mu’nis’s palace ; and that if Muhassin were to die, his father should be spared.—Harun b. Gharib however remarked that if Muhassin were to die, it would not be safe to spare his father ; how after the slaughter of his son could he be trusted to be loyal ?—They then in a body openly told Muqtadir that if Ibn al-Furat and his son were not put to death, all the officials would rebel. Harun b. Gharib further importuned Muqtadir to put them both to death, declaring that he would not answer for the officials not joining together to proclaim some other member of the Hashimite family Caliph, and then the mischief would be incurable.—The party wanted Khaqani to urge this course, but he declared that he would have no part in the shedding of blood ; he had only advised that the two be not conveyed to the Palace : he regarded their execution as a blunder, for execution should in no case be made easy for or recommended to a king ; if this is done, the king thinks lightly of executing his ministers, and will put them to death for the slightest error or peccadillo. On Sunday 12 Rabi‘ii (July 18, 312) when Ibn al- Furat s food was brought to him, he bade them remove it on the ground that he was keeping fast ; when the time for breaking fast arrived he declared that he would not 154 A.H. 312. Caliphate of Muqtadir. break it that night. Urged by some one to change his mind he said : To-morrow I am to be put to death without a doubt. God forbid! ( 138 ) was the rejoinder.— No, he replied, yesterday I saw my brother Abu’l-'Abbas in a dream, and he said to me: The Monday after to-morrow you shall breakfast with us. He has never told me any¬ thing in my sleep but it has come true. To-morrow is a Monday, and that is the day whereon the blessed Husain son of ‘Ali was slain.— 1 When the morrow came—a Monday—the people descended to the Palace, but were not admitted. These officials then wrote demanding that Ibn al-Furat and his son be put to death. Muqtadir replied by requesting time for consideration. They wrote back that if the execution were delayed beyond that day, something irreparable would happen to the empire. Muqtadir then wrote to Nazuk, ordering him to de¬ capitate the two, and bring their heads to the Palace. Nazuk sent back word that this was a very serious matter, in which he could not act upon a mere rescript. Muqtadir then ordered the Ustadhs and the Eunuchs to convey to him the Caliph’s order to carry out what he had written. Nazuk replied that he would not act upon a message, but required an oral order. Ibn al-Furat was watching the proceedings, and when told that the officials had departed and that Nazuk had gone home, he was somewhat relieved ; but learning presently that Nazuk had returned to the Palace, he was gravely alarmed. In the afternoon Nazuk came to the vizier’s palace, and took his seat in the apartment where Ibn al-Furat was con¬ fined ; he then sent his eunuch ‘Ajib with some negroes to decapitate Mu^assin, and presently brought his head and laid it before his father. Ibn al-Furat was terrified at the sight, and finding himself threatened with the 1 This was disputed. According to Ya'qubi ii. 291 some said Saturday, some Monday, and some Friday. According to Wustenfeld’s tables 10 Muharram 61 (Oct. 10, 680 a.d.) would be Wednesday. VlZIERATE OF Abu'l-QaSIM KhAQANI. 155 sword, said to Nazuk : O Abu Mansur, must it be the sword ? Plead for me with the Commander of the Faithful, telling him that I have vast wealth, numerous deposits and valuable gems.—Nazuk replied: The affair has gone beyond that.—So he ordered him to be beheaded and then conveyed the heads of both to Muq- tadir, who ordered them to be thrown into the water. The heads were thrown into the Euphrates, the trunks from the Tabbanin bridge in Baghdad. ( 139 ) Ibnal-Furat's age on the day of his execution was seventy-one years and some months (God have mercy upon him !). His son was thirty-three years old. The astrologer 'Azmi had declared that in that year he apprehended disaster and death by the sword for Ibn al-Furat, and mentioned this in the horoscope which Ibn al-Furat had before him 1 ; he also inferred from the horoscope of MuAassin that his life would last thirty-three years. His forecasts came true. This year there came a despatch from Fariqi in Basrah 2 stating that he had received a communication from Abu'l-Haija Ibn #amdan 3 at Hajar to the effect that he had spoken with Abu Tahir the Qarmaftan about the pilgrims whom he had captured, soliciting their release ; this had, he said, been promised. He had ascertained the number of the men whom Abu Tahir held in captivity to be 2,229, and that of the women about 500. News presently came of their arrival in a series of groups, the last to arrive being Abu’l-Haija and Ahmad b. Badr, brother of the Queen-mother's father. Together with Abu'l-Haija there arrived an envoy from Abu Tahir the Qarmahan requesting the evacuation of Basrah, Ahwaz and certain other regions. He was hospitably entertained and furnished lavishly 1 Ibn al-Furat’s horoscope is given in Hilal’s work, p. 8. The same author ascribes the prophecy about him to the famous Abu Ma'shar, of whom Tanukhi tells some stories. 2 See above, p. 105. • He had been taken prisoner by the yarmadans at Habir. 156 A.M. 312. Caliphate of Muqtadir. with supplies ; he was then dismissed without having obtained any of his demands. The same year a robe of honour was bestowed on Nujh Tuluni, who was then sent back to Ispahan as minister of public security. There also arrived an envoy from the Byzantine Emperor, accompanied by 'Umair b. 'Abd Al-Baqi 1 ; he had an audience of the Sultan to whom he brought presents, and from whom he requested a truce and the ransoming of the captives. These were accorded after the summer raid. Both received robes of honour and the envoy returned to the Byzantine country. • The same year a robe of honour was bestowed on Jinni Safwani who arrived from Diyar Mu^ar, having been summoned ( 140 ) for the purpose of warring against Abu Tahir the Qarmadan. Sulaiman b. Hasan b. Makhlad and Abu ‘Ali Ibn Muqlah 2 had been in banishment in Shiraz, in the cus¬ tody of Abu 'Abdallah Ja'far b. Qasim Karkhi ; according to Ibn Muqlah they were in one apartment and well treated and protected. The news of Ibn al- Furat’s arrest were brought to the governor, who also had in his custody Abu'l-J^usain Ibn Abi'l-Baghl, whom he had succeeded in office. Ibn Muqlah records how the news were communicated to them all, and Ibn Abi’l-Baghl, who had got possession of the instructions sent by Ibn al-Furat and MuAassin for his case, when he heard the tidings, wrote on the margin of the document: This day was born Mohammed b. Ahmad b. Yahya being eighty-one years old. 3 When Karkhi received the news, he proceeded to release Ibn Muqlah and Sulaiman b. flasan, congratulating them on their deliverance, before the order to release them reached him. Presently there 1 His brother had acted as interpreter on the former occasion. a This has to be reconciled with the statement on p. 113 ; Karkhi's appoint¬ ment was in 310, p. 84. a The name is his own. 157 VIZIERATE OF Abu’L-QaSIM KhAQANI. arrived the order from Khaqani to Misma'i 1 and Karkhi that the two should be released but kept under surveil¬ lance so that they should not leave Shiraz. Sulaiman remained a week till he had completed his plans. Mean¬ while Misma'i summoned Karkhi to a magnificent feast, and kept up the merriment two consecutive days, in ignorance of the fact that Sulaiman had escaped in the guise of a runner-messenger. When they wrote to Khaqani announcing Sulaiman’s flight, the vizier was troubled, and rumours began to circulate that Sulaiman had been appointed vizier. The latter entered Baghdad secretly. Ibn Muqlah remained in Shiraz until his wife had brought influence to bear on Khaqani’s dependents and obtained the interest of Shafi‘, freedman of Muq- tadir. Khaqani then permitted him to be set free to go to Ahwaz, where two hundred dinars were to be allowed him every month, but whence he was not to move. He remained there for a time, after which owing to the inter¬ cession of some persons leave was given him to come to Baghdad. ( 141 ) This year Mu’nis the Muzaffar spoke to the vizier Khaqani on the subject of ‘Ali b. ‘Isa, asking him to write to Abu Ja'far governor of Yaman bidding him permit ‘Ali b. ‘Isa to return to Meccah. He wrote as requested, and Abu Ja'far gave the leave, sending him besides perfume, clothing and furniture to the value of 50,000 dinars. ‘Ali b. ‘Isa returned to Meccah with the Yamanite pilgrims. After his arrival he was by the request of Mu’nis invested by Khaqani with the office of Overseer of Egypt and Syria. When he reached Meccah, and before he had received that appointment, he wrote to Khaqani to congratulate him on his vizierate and condole with him on the death of his father Abu ‘Ali; further to request him to protect his wife and children, and see that they remained in possession of his 1 ‘Abdallah b. Ibrahim, minister of public security of Fars above p. 20, but dismissed 26 ; probably restored later, 158 A.H. 312. Caliphate of Muqtadir. estate and his pension. Khaqani returned a courteous re pty> stating that he had attended to the interests of his wife, his children and his dependents, but that he claimed no merit nor gratitude for so doing. Account of the circumstances which resulted in the dismissal of Khaqani from his vizier ate. Abu l- Abbas Ibn al-Khasibi having discovered the refuge of MuAassin’s wife, daughter of #inzabah, had requested to be employed in enquiring into her affairs and obtaining money from her. Having received the commission he compelled her to pay 700,000 dinars, which he lodged in the Private Treasury ; thereby pre¬ paring the road for his promotion to high office by Muq¬ tadir, who began to think of him as a future vizier. When Khaqani heard of this, he suggested to Ibn Ba'ud Sharr to offer to make Khasibi disgorge 100,000 dinars at once, being money that he had obtained from the estate of Mu^assin and his wife over and above what he had paid into the Treasury from that source. Khaqani put this offer before the Caliph, but it was not favourably received ; the story reached Khasibi, who wrote a letter to Muqtadir, exposing the vices of Khaqani, his son, and his clerks, their waste (142) of the revenue, and mis¬ management of affairs. This letter he delivered to an agent who communicated it to Muqtadir and the Queen- mother. Khaqani heard of this, and rumour became rife on the subject; he lost courage and an illness of which he was suffering became so serious that for months he could eat neither lamb nor fowl, but only forty drachms of bread in the day, afterwards reduced to twenty ; tumours appeared on his body, his feet and his face ; for all that, he held up, and continued to sail once or twice a month to the Palace, while his son represented him on ceremonial days. Presently there was a mutiny of the cavalry, who demanded their pay and went out to the Oratory 1 ; they were promised it, but payment 1 See above, p. 127. VlZIERATE OF KHASIBI. 159 was delayed, so they mutinied again, and were inclined to pillage ; Baghdad was on the verge of a serious civil war. Yaqut appeared, bearing an order of Muqtadir to Khaqani to pay them a complete four months' stipend, 1 which Yaqut himself guaranteed. Muqtadir also sent to Khaqani ordering him to pay up what was due to them. Khaqani replied that he could not do it, and that he was ill. Muqtadir then sent a second message, bidding him get together somehow a hundred thousand dinars, to which the Caliph himself would add twice that amount, to be spent upon them. Khaqani insisted that he could not raise a hundred thousand dirhems and that he had quite enough to do in providing the money for the foot- guards, for the H ujari retainers, the court attendants, and the deputy chamberlains. Muqtadir then ordered three hundred thousand dinars to be drawn from the Private Treasury, and trusted Yaqut with the distribu¬ tion of that sum. Mu'nis the Muzaffar was in Wasit at the time of the mutiny of the cavalry, but being summoned by Muqtadir came to the capital, where he was met by Prince AbuVAbbas, the vizier Khaqani, and the other Ustudhs and officers of high rank. He had an audience of Muqtadir, who informed him of the financial straits, and the collapse of Khaqani, and consulted him about dismissing the vizier. Mu’nis suggested delaying this measure until he had interviewed and questioned him himself. Meeting Khaqani he was told by the latter that he could raise no money to spend on state require¬ ments, pleading that his illness left him no superfluous energy for work. When Mu'nis realized Khaqani’s collapse, he advised that 'Ali b. Tsa be summoned and be appointed ( 143 ) vizier. Muqtadir regarded this pro¬ posal as absurd, and then the Queen-mother and her sister suggested Abu'l-‘Abbas Khasibi. Muqtadir proceeded to arrest Khaqani, whereupon his son ‘Abd al-Wahhab 1 This is the explanaiton of the razqah of the text given in the Mafatih, p. 59. 160 A.H. 313. Caliphate of Muqtadir. went into hiding. The like was done by Ishaq b. ‘Ali Qunna’i, and his brother, Ibn Ba'ud Sharr, and Khaqan b. Ahmad b. Yahya b. Khaqan. The rest 1 showed themselves. The duration of Khaqani’s vizierate was a year and six months. Reason for the appointment of Abu’l-Abbas Khasibi. On Thursday 11 Ramadan 313 (Nov. 30, 925) Muq¬ tadir sent for Abu’l-'Abbas Kha.stbi Ahmad b. ‘Ubai- dallah, invested him with the vizierate and the presidency of the Bureaux, and bestowed on him a robe of honour ; there rode with him Harun b. Gharib, Yaqut, Nazuk, and most of the commanders. Thumal the Stewardess appointed in his place as secretary of the bureau of the Queen-mother’s estates Abu Yusuf ‘Abd al-Rahman b. Mohammed ; this man had “ repented ” of the imperial service, 2 so when he was put in charge of this important office people called him The Apostate. He recovered large sums which his predecessor Khasibi had neglected, whence Thumal harboured a secret grievance against the latter. Throughout his tenure of office Khasibi drank wine all night and slept during the day ; when he woke he was fuddled, and had no energy left for work. 3 So he committed to Malik b. Walid the opening and reading of letters which came from the ministers of public security and of kharaj , who also had to make notes on them and forward them to the bureaux, and likewise to read the letters which were to be despatched, and mark them. He used in the case of important documents either arriv¬ ing or leaving to make brief summaries, which he showed to the vizier when he woke, and the vizier sometimes 1 Of Khaqani’s party. 2 i.e., abandoned it out of conscientious motives. A story of Tanukhi’s illustrates this pharse. • The later history of this vizier suggests that this is grossly overstated. VlZIERATE OF KhASIBI* 161 read them and sometimes did not; in the latter case they would be read by Abu'l-Faraj Israel, who would make such notes upon them as he chose. The summaries were written out by Abu Sa'id Wahb b. Ibrahim b. T azad, and at times would remain for days in the vizier's presence ; when they accumulated, the vizier would order them to be read out, and have such comments as he thought proper entered under each paragraph. The summary would then be handed out to Malik b. Walid, with whom it would remain ( 144 ) a day or two. It would then be delivered to the chief of the bureau which it con¬ cerned, who would read it and enter such comments as he thought fit. Then an answer would be composed in the bureau which would go first to the chief of the bureau, who would read it and mark it. Before the reply could be despatched dykes would have burst, breaches have widened, the Bedouins have carried off the crops, or some other catastrophe have happened which rendered the reply nugatory. When Kalwadhani saw this, and perceived that loss was increasing and the error becoming irremediable, he wrote to the provincial officials, requesting them to send copies to him of all the letters which they addressed to the vizier. He then wrote on the back of these copies the answer which should be given, and after a week or more the letters supposed to be dictated by the vizier were handed to him. The vizier Khasibi instructed Abu'l-Hasan Ibn Thawabah to read the appeals, and enter the decisions for him on some other than Appeal day ; when that day came, he was to collect them, summarize them, and the vizier would, after reading the statement, decide in accordance with what he had suggested. For revenue he chiefly relied on the goods of the officials whom he fined, the first of whom was Abu’l-Qasim Khaqani ; Mu’nis however espoused his cause, informing Muqtadir that the man had no strength to move, and that he had < * • r t \ -- 162 A.H. 313. Caliphate of Muqtadir. assessed his own fine with those of his son and his clerks at a quarter of a million dinars. Muqtadir ratified that arrangement, and sent an autograph on the subject to Khasibi; the latter then proceeded to lay his hands on the holders of office and clerks, fining them at haphazard. Thus he fined Ja'far b. Qasim Karkhi 150,000 dinars, and arrested Maliki, Hisham, 'Ali b. #usain b. Hindi, and the heirs of Abu Ahmad Karkhi ; further Hasan son of Ibn al-Furat, Yahya b. 'Amrawaihi, Abu’l- Hasan b. Mabandadh, Ishaq b. Isma'il Nubakhti, Mohammed b. Ya'qub Misri, (145) and the heirs of Nasr b. Fath, chief of the Treasury ; further Ibn 'Abd al- Wahhab and 'Abdallah b. Jubair. Rumour became rife that Khasibi was to be dismissed from the vizierate, on the ground that he was an ass, skilful at nothing but inflicting fines, and devoted to drink and play. Every¬ thing was going to ruin, and business at a standstill. The names of various successors were mentioned. This year Abu Tahir Sulaiman b. #asan the Qarmaiian fought in the neighbourhood of Kufah a battle with the Sultan’s commanders wherein he took them captive. Ja'far b. Warqa was in charge of the districts of Kufah and of the Kufah Road. When the Pilgrims departed from Baghdad, he went in front for fear of Abu Tahir the Qarmafian ; and he had under his command a thousand men of his cousins, the Banu Shaiban. The first caravan was accompanied by Thumal, admiral, and " in the caravan of the umbrella ” 1 were Jinni Safwani, Tarif Subkari, and Siyashir the Dailemite. The escort of the caravans provided by the Sultan numbered six thousand men. They were met by Abu Tahir Jannabi, the first commander who came in his way being Ja'far b. Warqa ; there ensued a skirmish, after which Ja'far found himself attacked by a party of Abu Tahir’s followers who were mounted on swift camels, 1 The umbrella was, as often, a symbol of royalty. VlZIERATE OF KHASIBI. 163 leading horses; descending from their camels, they mounted the horses and proceeded to join battle with Ja far b. Warqa ; the latter did not hold his ground, but turned to flight with his followers of the Banu Shaiban. Meeting the caravan, which had descended from the hill, he bade them go back, explaining what had happened. Accordingly they hurried back and entered Kufah. Abu Tahir pursued the imperial troops and the caravans up to the gate of Kufah ; the commanders of the imperial forces who have been named went out and were defeated by him, Jinni Safwani being taken captive. For six days Abu Tahir remained outside Kufah, ( 146 ) entering the town in the day and leaving it at night, to pass the night in his camp ; and removing everything which could be carried off, including four thousand embroidered robes and three hundred skins containing oil. When he had removed everything which could be conveyed away, he went home to his own city. Ja far b. Warqa brought his defeated troops back to Baghdad, where Muqtadir proceeded to order Mu'nis to march to Kufah to fight the Qarmaflan. The people of Baghdad were seriously alarmed, and most of those who lived on the Western bank migrated to the Eastern. By the time Mu'nis reached Kufah Abu Tahir had evacu¬ ated it. So Mu'nis left Yaqut there as his deputy, and himself proceeded to Wasit. No-one could complete his pilgrimage. Year 313. 1 This year news arrived that 'Ali b. Tsa had gone on pilgrimage to Meccah from Egypt, and his chamberlain Salamah came to Baghdad bringing cheques for 147,000 dinars, with an account of various improvements and reforms that he had effected. He had been confirmed by Khasibi in his inspectorship of Egypt and Syria. It is evident that many events of this year have already been narrated. 164 A.H. 314. Caliphate of Muqtadir. Ibrahim Misma'i 1 in this year conquered the dis¬ trict of Qufs 2 , taking five thousand prisoners whom he brought to Fars. Fresh dates were exceedingly abundant in Baghdad this year ; indeed preserved dates were made of them and these were exported to Basrah, which was regarded as a highly improper proceeding. 3 The Byzantine Emperor this year sent a proclamation to the people on the frontiers commanding them to pay him tribute (kharaj). Unless, he wrote, you do this unresistingly, I shall attack you ; for I have ascertained your weakness. ( 147 ) Year 314. This year the Byzantines entered Malatia , 4 where they remained sixteen days, laying the place waste and taking the inhabitants into captivity. In it Abu'l-Qasim 'Abdallah b. Mohammed Kha- QANi died, having been released and sent to his house. When the cry announcing his death was raised, his house was seized in search of his son 'Abd al-Wahhab, who however could not be found. In it the people of Malada entered Baghdad to implore help against the Byzantines' attacks. In it Meccah was deserted by its inhabitants, who removed their families and goods, hearing that the Qar- madan was in their neighbourhood and fearing for their lives and possessions. Kalwadhani wrote to Khasibi informing him that Abu Talib Zaid b. 'Ali of Nubandajan had assumed the attitude of a local potentate, having seized imperial 1 He had been assigned the revenue-farming of Fars and Kirman. 2 A mountainous district in Kirman, of whose inhabitants Yaqut gives a lengthy description in his Geographical Dictionary. According to one of his authorities they bore no resemblance to human beings. * Basrah itself being the place where dates ordinarily were cheapest. 4 See Lebeau-Saint Martin xiii. 444. VlZIERATE OF KHASIBI. 165 estates, and that three million dirhems were due from him for the revenue which he had obtained from them. In the memoir which he drew up about this he referred to what had been written by Abu’l-Qasim ‘Ali b. A#mad b. Bistam at the time when he was appointed to Fars. The vizier wrote to Hasan b. Isma'il, who had gone to settle a dispute between Misma'i and Karkhi, to fine the delinquent a hundred thousand dinars ; #asan b. Isma'il sent for Zaid b. ‘Ali, and took his bond for that sum. 1 Account of an unfortunate scheme of Khasibi, whereby he lost control of most of the retainers , which could not afterwards be recovered. The vizier Abu'l-‘Abbas Khasibi arranged that Yusuf b. Dewadadh 2 should be put in charge of all the Eastern provinces, the whole of whose revenue should be paid to him, to be devoted with the revenues of the provinces which he farmed, Armenia and Adharbaijan, to paying his officers, troops and retainers. The vizier wrote to Yusuf bidding him come to Wasit, to be sent to Hajar to fight against Abu Tahir Jannabi. He advised that he should be addressed by his kunyah , and that Mu’nis the Mu^affar ( 148 ) should remain in Baghdad, to strengthen the imperial government by his presence and inspire its enemies with fear. When Ibn Abi'l-Saj approached Wasit, Mu'nis the Muzaffar, who was there, departed to Baghdad, and Wasit was entered by Ibn Abi’l-Saj. Before entering the place the latter de¬ spatched Abu ‘Ali Hasan b. Harun— a clerk of his, who used to serve him in private business as deputy to Abu ‘Abdallah Mohammed b. Khalaf Nirmani, and had won his confidence and affection—to negotiate with Khasibi respecting the sums to be paid to his troops, the revenue of the provinces for which he had obtained a contract, and the provinces whose revenues had been 1 The consequences of this will appear at the time of the rise of the Buwaihid. 2 Better known as Ibn Abi'l-Saj. 166 A.H. 314. Caliphate of Muqtadir. assigned to his forces in addition to the moneys already mentioned. Now Khasibi had assigned the revenues coming from the kharaj and the Estates in the regions of Hamadhan, Sawah, Ruzah, Qumm, Mah al-Basrah, Mah al-Kufah, the two Ighar , 1 Masabadhan and Mihrijan-Qudhaf, to Ibn Abi'l-Saj for his table during his campaign against Jannabi. Muqtadir ratified this, and ordered that he should be appointed to the ministries of prayer, public security, kharaj and Estates in all the districts of the Jabal. He sent him a standard, and called him by his kunyah. Prior to this Yusuf used to employ his kunyah in dealing with all persons except the vizier and Munis the Mu^affar. His agent ffasan b. Harun requested that the amount allotted to his table should be five thousand dinars per month ; alleging that he was not inferior to A/unad b. Su'luk, for whose table there had been assigned during the vizierate of i^amid b. ‘Abbas three thousand dinars a month, with ten thousand every two months of the pay-months of the retainers for the maintenance of retainers who did not appear. The clerks demanded that #asan b. Harun should accept a stipulation that the Sultan should send a paymaster to expend the revenues of those regions upon the troops and retainers of Ibn Abid-Saj. #asan b. Harun accepted all their demands and signed the documents containing them except this of the paymaster ; thinking that his master would not wish to represent himself before the provincial officials in the light of a man who could not be trusted to be honest with his own men. When Ibn Abid-Saj was invested with the govern¬ ment of the Jabal, and sent to fight the Qarmafian, ( 149 ) the governor of Khorasan was given charge of Rayy, whither he proceeded, and an official was de¬ spatched to speak with him about the revenue which he 1 The two Ighar were Karaj and Burj, districts assigned to ‘Isa and Ma'qil sons of Abu Dulaf (ob. 225). The name applies to lands of which the tax is fixed at the time of assignment, and which are not subject to alterations in the assessment. Second Vizierate of 'Ali b. 'Isa. 167 had arranged to transmit from Rayy. Meanwhile Ibn Abi'l-Saj came to Wasit, 1 whither Muqtadir sent him imperial robes, a sword and belt of gold, horses with gold and silver trappings, perfume and armour. Account of the arrest of Khasibi and appointment of ' Ali b. ‘Isa to the vizierate. Khasibi's financial difficulties became serious, and his position untenable. Mu'nis recommended the appoint¬ ment of 'Ali b. 'Isa. The hour after sunrise on Thursday 11 Dhu’l-Oa'dah (Jan. 18, 927) officers were sent to arrest Khasibi, his son, and his clerks, who were conveyed to the Palace and confined under the charge of the Stewardess Zaidan. Khasibi and his son were separated, and the rest of the prisoners were transferred to the vizier's palace at Mukharrim. At the time of Khasibi's arrest Nazuk sent to protect his former residence from pillage. Muqtadir summoned Abu'l-Qasim 'Ubai- dallah b. Mohammed Kalwadhani to an audience at which he informed him that 'Ali b. 'Isa had been appointed vizier, and that he (Kalwadhani) was to under¬ take the duties of his deputy. Salamah Tuluni was also summoned and ordered to proceed by the desert route to Damascus and fetch 'Ali b. 'Isa. Kalwadhani proceeded in the barge wherein Khasibi had been arrested from the Palace to the palace of the vizier in Mukharrim, attended to the business, and wrote letters to the officials in the provinces and to all princes, postmasters, secret service agents and judges, to the effect that 'Ali b. 'Isa had been appointed vizier and he himself deputy. He proceeded to discharge the functions of vizier, issuing orders and prohibitions, and appointing and cashiering officials. That day Abu 'Ali Ibn Muqlah and Abu'l-Fath al-Fadl b. Ja'far Ibn JTinzabah issued from conceal¬ ment and went to salute Kalwadhani. 1 The text has Rayy, clearly an oversight. 168 A.H. 314. Caliphate of Muqtadir. (150) The vice-vizier ate of Kalwadhani for 1 Ali b. ‘Isa, and his conduct of affairs. Khasibi had got together all the bonds of the persons who had incurred fines, the guarantees of those who had given security for them, and the contracts of the revenue- farmers in the Sawad, Ahwaz, Fars, and the West. He had in his possession besides the bond of the secretary of Misma i for a million dirhems to be paid at once on account of the increase in the amount due from him as farmer of the revenue of Fars, 1 and that of Sulaiman b. i^asan for 400,000 dinars and a fraction, as rectification of the accounts of the two sons of ‘Abd al-Wahhab ; further the bond of the same for 500,000 dinars guar¬ anteed by him from the provinces of Syria ; further those of the revenue-farmers of Wasit, Basrah, the Khorasan Road, the Nahrawanat, Nahr Buq, the Lower Dhi'b, Jazar and “ the Ancient City,” 2 and of others. Kal¬ wadhani secured all these for ‘Ali b. ‘Isa to whom he delivered them on his arrival. Nu.sair b. Ali paid him 200,000 dirhems and Ahmad b. Ishaq b. Zuraiq 10,000 dinars ; and a week after the dismissal of Khasibi there arrived a despatch-rider from Sulaiman b. i^asan with letters containing cheques to the value of 80,000 dinars. There also arrived the revenue sent by land from Egypt by ‘Ali b. ‘Isa, 3 and ten thousand dinars from Burjumali in Qumm, and cheques for 400,000 dirhems from Abu ‘Ali Ibn Rustam on account of the revenue which he farmed. This enabled Kalwadhani to keep things going. He paid stipends to all the pay-earners and to the cavalry before the Feast. The awe of Ali b. ‘Isa which filled men's minds helped Kalwadhani to administer affairs, which he continued to do. Ali b. Isa proceeded from Damascus to the 1 Hitherto he has appeared as minister of public security there. 2 According to Yaqut the part of Baghdad which had been inhabited before Mansur s foundation. 3 See above, p. 146. Second Vizierate of ‘Ali b. ‘Isa. 169 Bridge of Manbij, whence he went down the Euphrates towards Baghdad. People went out to meet him : some of them as far as Raqqah. ( 151 ) Year 315. Account of the administration of 'Ali b . 'Isa in this vizierate and what happened in his days. Reaching Baghdad he first presented himself at the Palace, which he reached after the latter evening prayer, accompanied by Mu’nis ; he was courteously addressed by Muqtadir, and proceeded to his residence ; the same night Muqtadir sent him splendid raiment, furniture and cash, it is said, to the value of 20,000 dinars. On the morrow he presented him with a robe of honour ; Mu'nis on this occasion accompanied him to his home in spite of the protestations of 'Ali b. 'Isa. After establishing himself in his official residence he went, preceded by Harun b. Gharib, Shafi', Muflih, Nasim, Yaqut, Nazuk, and all the commanders, to his house at the Bustan Gate. Attempts had been made to irritate the new vizier against Hisham, who kept away in alarm ; the vizier wrote to reassure him, and when in consequence Hisham visited him, the vizier said to him : It is not my practice to remember injuries, and when God delivered me from San‘a and I returned to Meccah, I made a vow that I would do no harm to any of those who intrigued to ruin me when I was in office. I leave them all to God. You in old times rendered services which give you a claim upon me and me a still greater claim upon you. You may not observe your duty in the matter, but I shall continue to observe mine. ‘Ali b. 'Isa gave Kalwadhani charge of the bureau of the Sawad, telling him that it was the most important of the bureaux ; if, he said, you were to be distracted by the vice-vizierate, it would suffer, and there is no-one 170 A.H. 315. Caliphate of Muqtadir. who can manage it as you can.—He proceeded to arrange the offices and appoint officials, and put the bureaux in order. He relied on Ibrahim b. Ayyub to present him financial reports, and to instruct the Treasurer what to disburse each day, demanding of him weekly budgets, m order that he might know as quickly as possible ( 152 ) how much had been spent, how much received and what balance there was. Previously the practice had been that when the accounts for a month had been closed, no report was brought to the bureau until the middle of the next month. He appointed Abu'l-Fath al-Fadl b. Ja'far Ibn //inzabah to the bureau of the East, and Abu Bakr Mohammed b. Jinni to that of the West; Abu 'Ali Ibn Muqlah to that of the private and of the New estates ; Abu Mohammed #usain b. Ahmad Madara’i to that of the Confiscated estates of Ibn al-Furat; Abu Mohammed b. Rauh to that of the Control of the kharaj and public estates in the Sawad, Ahwaz, Fars, Kirman, and other places belonging to the same bureau ; Abu'l-Qasim Ibn al-Naffat to that of the Control of expenditure and of the Treasury ; Abu Ja'far Qummi to that of the Palace ; Abu Ahmad ‘Abd al-Wahhab b. #asan to that of the Charities and that of Alms : Abu’l-Fath Mohammed b. Ahmad TCalansuwah to that of the Control of the Army , Mohammed b. Tsa to that of the Haram 1 and Abu Yusuf to that of the signet and the seal. He further appointed competent men in the provinces and reduced their pay to ten months in the year, and that of the postmasters and paymasters to eight months. He made reductions in the pay of the infantry on guard and the cavalry, and all the clerks and tradesmen who earned pay from these two institutions ; and from all those who did not bear arms. He removed from the pay-list the infants of the paid soldiery, &c. ; he reduced the allow¬ ances of the eunuchs and court attendants, courtiers, Probably the Sultan s domestic expenditure- Second Vizierate of 'Ali b. 'Isa. 171 table-companions, minstrels, purveyors, and intercessors ; and those of the retainers and dependents of the heads of bureaux. He attended to business personally night and day, and held meetings with the heads of the bureaux at night, sitting' up most of the night until things had been brought into order and a balance be¬ tween revenue and expenditure been established. At the time Abu 'Abdallah Baridi farmed the private estates and the fief of the viziers, while his brother Abu Yusuf Baridi managed for the vizier the kharaj (153) in Ramhurmuz, both plain and mountain. Report of the discussion between the vizier ‘Ali b. ‘Isa and his predecessor Ahmad b. ‘Ubaidallah Khasibi. Muqtadir ordered ‘Ali b. ‘Isa to examine Abu’l- ‘Abbas Khasibi, who was brought out of his prison and examined in the Palace in the presence of the Ustadhs, the commanders, and the judges, but gently. He was asked how much he had realized from the kharaj, the Estates and the provinces ; he did not know. He was asked how much he had disbursed from the Treasury in the capital ; he could not remember. He was asked how much he had realized from the assets of persons who had been fined, from their bonds for fines, from money guaranteed on their behalf, and what he had himself guaranteed to obtain from such persons.—He replied that during the fourteen months wherein he had held office he had realized in fines about a million dinars.— He was asked how much of this had been got from the Khaqani set ; for (said the vizier) the Commander of the Faithful has told me that you undertook to obtain half a million dinars from them.—He replied that Khaqani had been protected by Mu’nis the Mu^affar.—This was denied by the company, who said to him : He was put in your power, until you were charged with poisoning him, when you released him.—Then ‘Ali b. ‘Isa asked jiim: Why did you summon Yusuf Ibn Abi’l-Saj to 172 A.H. 315. Caliphate of Muqtadir. Wasit, and put into his power all the Eastern provinces except Ispahan ? And how could you suppose that he could march with people accustomed to the mountains and to the life there by the main land in the direction of the coast among the regions round Hajar ?—He replied that he had supposed that measure to be right.—Then the vizier asked : When you took that step, why did not you content yourself with making him muster his troops and his retainers, letting them be paid on the same prin¬ ciple as the army of Mu’nis, to which certain revenues are assigned, paid through paymasters appointed by the Sultan, who have to render their accounts to the bureaux of the Army, and not to one bureau only but to all; so that there is no increase of pay ( 154 ) and no transference from rate to rate except by recognized promotion, and the paymasters save every month a considerable sum through fines and falling out ? Why did you not leave the provinces in the hands of the Sultan’s agents, assign¬ ing to them the duty of providing the pay of his troops as is done in the case of the troops of Abu’l-Hasan Mu’nis the Muzaffar ? He said : I did not follow that course because Yusuf had undertaken a tremendous task which necessitated extra liberality in his treatment.—The vizier asked: Why did you grant Ibrahim b. ‘Abdallah Misma'i the revenue-farming of Fars and Kirman ?— He replied : Because of the increase which he offered.— The vizier rejoined : Do you not know that it is more important to protect the principal than to seek extra profit ? Grant that you were anxious to obtain this increase, why did you not summon him to the capital, and if after his arrival you wished to grant him the con¬ tract, why not make him remain there and put deputies in charge of his business, and only let him go after he had given good security for the payment ?—He replied : His desire to obtain the contract was conditional on his working it himself.—The vizier replied : I hope that God will let no harm result.—Then he went on : Why did Second Vizierate of 'Ali b. 'Isa. 173 you pocket two thousand dinars a month as the stipend of your son, who never read a letter nor attended at the office nor is good for any business whatever ?—He replied : I asked the Commander of the Faithful if he might have the same salary as was given to Mu^assin and ‘Abd al-Wahhab son of Khaqani, and he assented.— The vizier replied : Mufessin was bred in the public offices and did administer; wicked, unscrupulous and impious as he was, he was a clerk. Khaqani's son did act as his father's deputy, issuing orders and prohibitions, and doing intelligent service ; whereas your son behaved unlike either of these. Give your bond that you will refund what he received.—He retorted : How am I to refund money which he has received and spent ?—The vizier asked : On what did he spend it ?—He replied : On what young men ordinarily spend such sums. Then the vizier questioned him about the goods of the fined officials, and the amount that had been realized from this source. He said : I do not remember the figure, but it is entered in the bureau of the fined officials. —The vizier : It is about that I am asking you.— Khasibi: It is in the possession of Hisham, ( 155 ) and if he be asked he will give you the information. He is in possession of the papers of the fined officials, the guar¬ antees, and the estimates.—The vizier : You are the first person who has handed the bonds of the fined officials to the chief of the bureau of fines ; it has been the practice to retain the bonds in the archives of the viziers, one vizier handing them on to the next. If your idea was to increase the importance of the bureau, you should have taken the bonds in duplicate, one copy for the bureau, and the other to remain in your possession. Suppose the head of the bureau were to sell the bonds of the fined officials, the securities and the guarantees of the revenue-farmers, could there have been a greater disaster to the Sultan in connexion with all this property than yourself ? If this be your management of the only 174 A.H. 315. Caliphate of Muqtadir. subject which you understand, what can have been your method with regard to the other business of the bureaux ? Either you have been betraying your trust, or you have been mismanaging every branch of the busi¬ ness.—‘Ali b. ‘Isa addressed him the whole time without using any offensive expression or raising his voice. Then he said to him : You have brought dishonour on the empire, by scourging women, and have violated decorum by putting them in the power of men ; for what purpose did you deliver the daughter 1 of Ja'far b. al- Furat to Aflah, a handsome young man, who con¬ trived to marry her when in your custody ? For what purpose did you have Daulah and her son beaten in your presence, and not content with this keep the whole party in the custody of your retainers and chamberlains a number of months ?—He went on to say : You have taken as your stipend five thousand dinars a month • in fourteen months that amounts to seventy thousand dinars, in addition to the stipend which your son has been receiving. From your fief you have obtained in a year and two months as appears from the stamps of your collector found in your office 180,000 dinars. This makes a total of 250,000 dinars.—Thereupon he produced a document in the writing of ‘Ali b. Mohammed b. Rauh 2 showing this sum, and showing that he had disbursed each month in permanent expenses 2,500 dinars ; total for fourteen months 35,000 dinars For ( 156 ) occasional expenses, presents, maintenance of establishment, with cost of perfume and wearing apparel 20,000 dinars. Cost of ground added to his dwelling and of building thereon 40,000 dinars. Presents for the Persian New Year’s Day and the Autumn to the Caliph, the two Princes (his sons) Abu’l-‘Abbas and Harun, the Queen-mother, her sister, Zaidan and Mufli h, 35,000 dinars. Cost of mules, horses, camels, eunuchs and 1 MuAassin's wife. * His father was controller of the Bureau of the Sawad, &c. Second Vizierate of 'Ali b. 'Isa. 175 slaves, 10,000 dinars. Money spent on officers of the vizier's palace, such as deputy-chamberlains, door¬ keepers, messengers, and presents to mounted men and infantry, 20,000 dinars. In reply Khasibi said : This is a correct account, only I have not made notes of all my expenses; thus I have had ornaments made for my women and children, and spent other sums which I have concealed from my secretary ; but for all that I have neither stolen nor embezzled.—The vizier : No-one asserts that you did either, only you have been wasteful and a bad manager, and have meddled with what you did not understand. Had you taken many times the amount with which we have debited you, the Commander of the Faithful would have asked you no questions about it, especially as these sums are charged against your salary and your fief, and the provision made for expenses which you necessarily incurred. How shall we challenge them, when we like all the clerks of the Commander of the Faithful have to live by his bounty ? I myself possess estates which I earned in his service and that of his ancestors, on whom God have mercy. 'Ali b. Tsa continued in this courteous style and ultimately obtained his bond for 40,000 dinars to be paid within forty days, after he had sworn that he had no means of raising more. 'Ali b. Tsa handed the paper to Muffin, bidding him present it to the Commander of the Faithful, and say to him: Though this man over¬ estimated his own abilities, and was wasteful and negligent, still respect is due to him as a servant of the Commander of the Faithful, and he has sworn by his oath of allegiance that this sum is the utmost which he can raise. He is not to be blamed ; the fault lies with those who deceived you about him, and gave you bad advice in respect to his appointment.—He further wrote a letter to Muqtadir stating that he had accepted ( 157 ) 176 A.H. 315. Caliphate of Muqtadir. Khasibi s offer and had put him in the custody of the Stewardess Thumal until he should have paid the amount on which they had ultimately agreed. Account of ' Alt b. ‘Isa’s policy in this vizier ate. When 'Ali b. 'Isa examined the state of affairs, he found the most serious matter to be financing the Masaffi infantry, whose pay in his time amounted to eighty thousand dinars, and that of the troops of Mu nis the Muzaffar, which came to six hundred thousand dinars a year, exclusive of the infantry in attendance on him and the H ujaris who were under his orders ; for that had to be furnished together with the pay of similar troops * the payment of Mu nis s troops was assigned to certain provinces selected by Mu nis himself. After making provision for the purposes mentioned, he proceeded to deal with the pay of the deputy-chamberlains, court- attendants, physicians, mounted men of disbanded regiments, astrologers, bedmakers, cooks, grooms, and other paid attendants. One day when he left the*pres¬ ence of Muqtadir to embark in his barge, the eunuchs and court-attendants used violent language towards him. News having reached 'Ali b. 'Isa that Ibrahim b. al-Misma'i 1 had been taken violently ill, and had died in Nubandajan, he recommended the appointment of Yaqut to the ministry of war and public security in Fars, and that of Abu Tahir Mohammed b. 'Abd al-Samad to the ministry of public security in Kirman ; robes of honour were bestowed on both and standards conferred on them. The vizier further wrote to Qasim b. Dinar, bidding him proceed with all haste to Fars as minister of kharaj and Estates there. The similar offices which he had held in Ahwaz were assigned to Abu'l-#asan Ahmad b. Mohammed b. Mabandadh and Ibn Abi’l- Salasil. 1 See index s.v. Misma’i. Second Vizierate of 'Ali b. 'Isa. 177 ( 158 ) Abu’l-Faraj Ibn Abi Hisham narrates : When Abu Abdallah Baridi learned of the investiture of these persons with the financial administration of Ahwaz and its neighbourhood, he said : These provinces are assigned to these people, while my brother Abu Yusuf has to content himself with Surraq, and I myself with farming the revenue of the Private Estates ! Take, Abu Hisham, this document (meaning the letter which had arrived assigning him this office), and give it to your son to model his writing upon. My drum is going to make a noise which you shall presently hear.—Abu 'Abdallah Baridi had sent his brother Abu’l-#usain to the capital, when he heard that 'Ali b. 'Isa was getting into difficulties, with instructions to endeavour to secure for him the financial administration of Ahwaz should the new vizier be a man who accepted secret profits ; for 'Ali b. ‘Isa was too honest to do so. When Abu 'Ali Ibn Muqlah became vizier, Abu’l- #usain Baridi went to Abu Ayyub the broker, offering twenty thousand dinars ; in consequence his brother Abu 'Abdallah was given charge of the districts of Ahwaz with exception of Sus and Junddisabur. Abu’l-Ffusain himself was given charge of the Ibn al-Furat estates, and the other brother Abu Yusuf of the Private Estates and the low grounds ; it was stipulated that the money offered should remain in the broker’s possession until the promises were carried out. When they were carried out Ibn Muqlah received the money. He then gave an order that Ibn Abi’l-Salasil should be arrested, and Abu 'Abdallah Baridi went per¬ sonally to Tustar and seized him with his dependents. In his coffers and in the hands of his collector ten thousand dinars were found. These were taken by Baridi, who instructed Ibn Abi’l-Salasil to give a cheque for the sums held by the collector in payment of fictitious expenditure. From his clerk Baridi took two thousand dinars, from his deputy three thousand, and from his 178 A.H. 315. Caliphate of Muqtadir. door-keeper two thousand.— Abu 'Abdallah Baridi was one of the champion scoundrels of mankind. Strong representations were presently made to Ibn Muqlah that he had appointed Baridi to a post of which he was not worthy, so that the vizier dismissed him, making Abu Mohammed #usain b. Ahmad Madara'i controller, and various persons managers of the preliminary business. Abu Mohammed did nothing at all, ( 159 ) being accom¬ panied from the metropolis by his secretary and deputy ‘Ali b. Yusuf, who made a display of stupidity and incompetence which rendered him a bye-word. To begin with Abu 'Abdallah Baridi blocked the roads, and intercepted all his correspondence, so that from the time he entered Ahwaz until the time he was cashiered not a letter of his was read. Presently there¬ fore he was dismissed by Ibn Muqlah, who gave Abu 'Abdallah Baridi his place, saying that he had been deceived by the physique of the sheikh , and that not every one who made a good clerk was also a successful administrator. We return to the story of ‘Ali b. 'Isa and his imperial policy. When the budget of receipts was brought to him, he found a surplus on the viziers' fief, after payment of permanent expenses, amounting to 170,000 dinars. He wrote to Muqtadir to state that he could dispense with this fief, having saved money, while his own estate was prosperous, as also his trust, 1 owing to his being again employed by the Caliph ; he also could spare the salary allotted to the vizier, which with the amount given to Khasibi’s son came to seven thousand dinars a month.—Muqtadir wrote to thank him, but told him that he must on no account decline the customary stipend. ‘Ali b. 'Isa however vowed that he would accept no stipend for his service, as his practice was to avoid luxury. 1 Land nominally devoted to religious purposes : see above, p. 112. Second Vizierate of 'Ali b. ‘Isa. 179 This year there was a rising of the disbanded cavalry, who went out to the Oratory, plundered the castle called Thurayya, and slaughtered the game in the ffa’ir, and the cattle belonging to the villagers round about; Mu'nis went out to them, and promised the payment of their allowances, whereupon they returned to their homes. In this year too a robe of honour was bestowed on Mu'nis in connexion with his being despatched to the frontier, the Byzantine Emperor having entered SumaisaJ, where the naqus 1 was beaten in the public mosque, and the Byzantines held a religious service of their own. In the same year the loyalty of Mu'nis the Muzaffar showed signs of failing. Account of the reason for this. (160) One of the eunuchs of Muqtadir informed Mu'nis that the Caliph had ordered certain of his con¬ fidential servants to dig a pit in the apartment of the Palace known as the Tree-house, with the following design. When Mu'nis came thither to bid the Caliph farewell, before his departure for the frontier, other people were to be excluded, and Mu'nis received by himself in that court. Then on his way he should fall into that covered pit, upon which the eunuchs should go down and strangle him ; it should be publicly stated that he had died of a fall into a cellar. So Mu'nis kept away from the Palace, and was visited by all the com¬ manders, retainers and courtiers, with ‘Abdallah b. JTamdan and his brothers, and most of the Arabs ; and the Palace was cleared of troops. ‘Abdallah b. flamdan said to Mu'nis : We shall fight before thee, O Ustadh until thy beard grow. 2 —Muqtadir sent Nasim the cup¬ bearer to him with an autograph wherein the Caliph 1 The wooden hammer still used in some Christian communities in lieu of a bell. 8 Mu’nis was a eunuch. 180 A.H. 315. Caliphate of Muqtadir. swore that the story which had been told him was false. Mu'nis then dismissed the soldiers who were gathered in his house and replied to the autograph in suitable style, adding that, as he had not summoned any one, it was not his fault that the soldiers had gathered in his house.— Ibn amdan declined to leave, and vowed that he would not quit Munis's dwelling night or day until they had paid a joint visit to the Palace and he was satisfied that Mu nis was safe. So he remained with Mu'nis many days. There was added to this the fact that the payment of Mu nis and his troops had been charged on Ishaq b. Isma il, and this person was unable to meet it. ‘Ali b. Tsa was estranged from him owing to certain things recorded as done by him during ‘Ali's absence ; as the cavalry mutinied owing to the delay in the receipt of their pay, Ali b. Isa pressed Is^aq b. Isma'il for it, and put him into custody, making him give a bond for 50,000 dinars out of the revenue which he farmed ; he also put in custody Ahmad b. Yahya al-Jalakht his clerk, and a number of his associates, until he had made up the sum. He then dismissed him from his offices. He also pressed the finance officials in the Sawad so that he realized within the three days the amount spent on the comrades of Mu nis. Muqtadir wrote to the chief commanders to the effect that he granted a pardon for (161) their pillaging and burning Thurayya. The letter was read out to them and they expressed their gratitude ; they also requested that certain of their number who had been suspected of these acts might be attached to Mu'nis the Mu^affar and accompany him to the imperial presence. So he went down with them and was received by Muq¬ tadir, before whom he kissed the ground, while Muqtadir swore to the excellence of his intentions towards Mu’nis, who bade him farewell. Ali b. Isa then read to the Caliph a letter which he had received from Wasif Bektimuri to the effect that the Moslems had counterattacked the Byzantines and Second Vizierate of 'Ali b. 'Isa. 181 defeated them, and all the troops who were with them, and had slain many and made large captures. Mu'nis proceeded from his residence to his camp at the Sham- masiyyah Gate, escorted by the prince Abu'l-'Abbas, the vizier 'Ali b. 'Isa, the Chamberlain Nasr, and Harun b. Gharib. Then there arrived an envoy from the Byzantine emperor bearing a letter from the emperor's vizier (the logothete), to the vizier 'Ali b. Tsa, requesting a truce. First appearance of the Dailemites. This year saw the first appearance of the Dailemites ; the first of them who obtained possession of Rayy after the departure of Ibn Abi'l-Saj 1 being Laila b. Nu'man ; then Makan b. Kaki, who entered the service of the governor of Khorasan, 2 who had sent him a written invitation, which he accepted. Rayy was then seized by Asfar b. Shirawaihi, 3 one of whose captains was Mardawij b. Ziyar. Now when Asfar b. Shirawaihi got possession of Qazwin, he imposed on the inhabitants a vast contribution of money, and treated them with violence and cruelty ; he gave his Lailemites control over their lives and goods, deprived them of all rights, and tortured their officials to an extent which astonished him, not to speak of other people. The inhabitants lost heart and nerve, and '' their souls mounted their wind¬ pipes." 4 They despaired of life and longed for (162) death. Men, women and children made a joint proces¬ sion to the Oratory to implore the help of God and his aid in relief of their distress, passing a whole day in this manner. 1 The reference is to the first departure of Ibn Abi’l-Saj, since the defeat and death of Laila is recorded above in the year 309. In 314 Rayy was handed over to the governor of Khorasan. Tanukhi records the warning against the Dailemites sent in the latter year by Ibn Abi’l-Saj. 2 Mas'udi says Makan was in the service of Hasan b. Qasim. 3 According to Mas'udi sent by Nasr the Samanid to recover Rayy from Hasan b. Qasim. 4 Surah xxxiii. 10, 182 A.H. 315. Caliphate of Muqtadir. The news of this were brought to Asfar, who made light of their prayers ; but the following day Mardawij rebelled, attacked and put him to flight; he fled pre¬ cipitately and for a whole day though pursued was not caught. The day after, being hungry, he took refuge at a mill in a village, and asked the miller for food ; the miller produced bread and milk ; while Asfar was eating, Mardawij came in sight of the place, and finding that the marks of the horse's hoof went no further, he paused to look about. Seeing a labourer, he caught hold of him and asked him about Asfar ; the man declared he did not know him, but when intimidated, said that though he was not acquainted with Asfar, he had seen a mounted man entering the mill. Mardawij broke into the place, and finding Asfar eating bread, decapitated him. He then returned to Qazwin, quieted the people, remedied their grievances, put a %top to the extortion, and after making fair promises departed. So their prayer was answered. 1 Mardawij proceeded next to conquer Rayy and Ispahan ; he ill-treated the people in the latter, seizing goods and violating women, and playing the tyrant. He seated himself on a throne of gold, below which was one of silver, whereon the person whom he chose to favour took his seat. In days when he received official visits he arranged his army in lines at a distance from him. Mardawij laid heavy burdens on his men, who were in great awe of him. He used to say that he was Solomon the son of David, and his men the demons. He humili¬ ated the Turks, who became disaffected towards him, and sought an opportunity of doing him a mischief. Hatred of him took possession of the hearts of both 1 The account of this matter given here differs somewhat from that which is given in the year 321, where it is stated that Makan and Mardawij agreed to attack Asfar. The account given in Ibn Isfandiyar's chronicle is again different. He makes Makan kill “ Mohammed b. Su'luk,’' governor of Rayy. Above this was done by Ibn Abi’l-Saj. Mas'udi connects the incident of the mill with //asan b. Qasim, 183 Second Vizierate of ‘Ali b. ‘Isa. high and low, who were tired of him. The people of his realm were downhearted in his days. One day (my authority says) he was riding in a great cavalcade, and had gone into the desert. He used on such occasions to go between the files at a distance from them, and no-one would venture to approach him. The crowd was wondering at his fierceness and his pride, when the ranks (163) were penetrated by an unknown sheikh on horseback who cried out : This miscreant has gone too far , and before this day comes to an end you shall wrap him in his grave-clothes , and God shall take him. The people were amazed and bewildered. I (says Abu Makhlad ‘Abdallah b. Yahya) was in the cavalcade ; the people gazed at each other, and no-one uttered a syllable. The sheikh passed like the wind. The people then said *. Why do we not follow him and make him repeat what he said, and ask him whence he knows this , or capture him and bring him before Mardawij, who, if he hears the story, may blame us for letting him go ? They galloped after him right and left down every road and path, but he was not found ; it was as if the earth had swallowed him. Mardawij then returned, attended to nobody, entered his house, and undressed ; he then entered his bath and lingered long. One Kurtakin was his privileged attendant who guarded and looked after him in his privacy and at his bath \ but on this occasion he was told not to follow and so lagged behind in a bad humour. The Turks getting the opportunity attacked Mardawij in his bath and murdered him after he had defended himself with a silver basin which he held in his hand. One of the Turks slit open his belly, and when the entrails fell out, supposed that he had killed him. Wh.en he came out to his associates, they asked where his head was. He informed them that he had slit open the belly, but that did not satisfy them, so they went back to cut 184 A.H. 315. Caliphate of Muqtadir. °«? e head They found him standing on two chairs m the bath, having put back the entrails and holding his e y wit his hand ; he had also with the assistance of the man who looked after the bath broken the skylight and was about to climb out on the roof. When they saw him m this condition they beheaded him. The aftair became known between noon and the afternoon Pra , y f r ,’, a i the Turks who had been with him went out them* thCir COmrades and rode to the stables to plunder This year too Abu Ja'far Ibn Shirzad became famous and was favoured by ‘Alt b. ‘Isa. Account of this ’ matter . The reason for this was that Ibn Shirzad used to act as secretary to Harun b. Gharib, (164) and look after 1 his affairs. Harun s cupidity was aroused with regard to his possessions, and he was charged with serious offences. Harun arrested him on Wednesday 8 Jumada i Mu’iirs 11 7 ih 92 -P’ and handed him over ^ his eunuch Mu nis, with orders to confine him strictly and let him W T n °H lnk ' A ! n ° lett6r arriV6d from him t0 his brother fh P n SAN + k AKARIYYA ' who was in the employ of the Queen-mother s sister as head of the office of her estates, he informed his mistress of his brother’s case and she complained to the Queen-mother; the latter sent one of her eunuchs to Harun, and rescued Ibn Shirzad from him, bringing him to the Palace The Queen-mother ordered his release; but Harun b Gharib put the case before ‘Ali b. 'Isa, stating that he had , b ? rr ? W< T d large sums from him for Khaqani for which he had got allocations, which he had appropriated My secretary Mu’ammal (he said) has drawn up an account showing that he owes a vast sum. I shall be satisfied if some one in whom the vizier has confidence * ^ m ° re elaborate account of this affair is given later nn c the details appear to be quite inconsistent. S Some of Second Vizierate of ‘Ali b. ‘Isa. 185 examines that statement.—‘Ali b. ‘Isa ordered Abu Yusuf, secretary to the Queen-mother, to go to Harun’s house, where Mu'ammal and his clerks were present, and they examined the statement. The first charge in this statement was that in one of the sets of papers in his office there was found a report of his receipts on allocations 1 assigned to Ibn Shirzad by Khaqani for the loans which he had received from the property of Harun b. Gharib, wherein he stated that he had received fifteen thousand dinars; but that he (Mu ammal) had not found this sum among the receipts of the collector which were entered in the bureau. Ibn Shirzad's clerk in this bureau was Ibn Abi Maimun, who made the following statement : The sum, he said, was entered in the receipt-book of the collector, and my chief has an autograph of the prince, acknowledging the receipt of it, and he brought the money into the presence of the prince, who expended it on the purchase of the house of Mu^assin, which was bought of the Caliph's agent during the vizierate of Abu’l-Qasim Khaqani. The identical receipt-book was produced and the receipt found there. Only the writer of the receipt-book had entered the sum as though it were an item in the preceding account, whereas it should have been written distinct and separate from the pre¬ ceding item. Abu Yusuf ( 165 ) and Mohammed b. Jinni found that the matter was as the clerk of Ibn Shirzad had stated ; and Ibn Shirzad produced the autograph of Harun b. Gharib acknowledging the receipt of the sum from the aforesaid source, and stating that it had been paid to the Treasury as the price of the house ; and the receipt of the Treasurer was also produced. Under the second head it was noticed that one fourth of the sum paid to the cavalry in Harun's army was paid The word here used is ordinarily applied to revenue allocated to special payments. The charge then was that certain funds having been assigned for the payment of what Harun had lent, his secretary had appropriated them. 186 A.H. 315. Caliphate of Muqtadir. in dirhems, at the rate of sixteen dirhems for a dinar ; and that he had not put down the change as paid to the men. More than twenty thousand dinars were due from him on this account for the period of time wherein he had been Harun's secretary. They produced the receipt- books and found that the collector had reckoned what went to the men's pay in silver only without putting down anything for the change. Ibn Shirzad's clerk defended him on the ground that the change was put down in a part of the book which dealt with the sources of the moneys and in the last paragraph of that chapter, containing what had been saved from this and other sources on the payments made by Harun b. Gharib. And this part of the book was produced. When these two charges had been refuted, and they constituted the most important parts of the statement, Abu Yusuf and Mohammed b. Jinni rose, and Ibn Shir- zad with them ; Harun however turned to him and said : This foolish and incompetent clerk of mine has made a fool of me, plague on him ! I have injured myself by dismissing you ; however, if you enter the employ of any one else, I shall do all sorts of things ;— threatening him. Ibn Shirzad went and recounted this to ‘Ali b. Tsa, and this led to the vizier interesting himself in Ibn Shirzad, whose trial became the talk of the society of clerks. In this year there came a rumour as also a despatch from Fariqi from Basrah to the effect that a numerous Qarmadan army, making in the direction of Kufah, had passed by the gate of Basrah nearest the desert. Muq¬ tadir in consequence wrote to Mu'nis the Mu^affar, bidding him return to Baghdad, 1 and he returned from Takrit, reaching Baghdad after the afternoon prayer, having sent a detachment of his army to the frontier. 1 We last heard of him as encamping at the Shammasiyyah Gate, being 9 -bout to start for the frontier, 187 Second Vizierate of 'Ali b. 'Isa. ( 166 ) Yaqut went out to his camp at Za'faraniyyah 1 on his way to his appointment in Fars. In this year Yusuf Ibn Abfl-Saj arrested his secretary Abu 'Abdallah Mohammed b. Khalaf Nirmani and gave his place to Abu 'Ali #asan b. Harun. He put the other into heavy fetters and took from him on the day of his arrest money, furniture, clothing, and slaves to the value of 100,000 dinars. He also took his bond for half a million dinars, being the fine which he assessed himself. Account of the reason for this. The reason for this was the luxury, extravagance and pomp which he had practised in Wasit; so lavish was he with his expenditure that in his house at Wasit he had thirty slaves to dispense drink in the public apartment and twenty in the private. When he was about to leave his house to go to that of his chief Yusuf, an early call would be paid him by all his chiefs commanders, the captains of his retainers and the chief officials, as was done by the people of Baghdad to the viziers on days of state ceremonies. Before this on the journey of Ibn Abfl-Saj from Rayy to Wasit he had assumed the qaba ', 2 the belt and the sword, only he did not ride to his chiefs in the black robe, in order to distinguish himself from the Sultan's vizier. All this Ibn Abfl-Saj endured. During his stay in Wasit however he aspired to the vizierate of the Sultan, and learning that Nasr the Chamberlain was ill-disposed towards Ibn Abfl-Saj, he wrote to him and sent a confidential agent to request Nasr to nominate him to Muqtadir for the vizierate in lieu of ‘Ali b. 'Isa, guaranteeing to extract from 'Ali b. 'Isa, his brother, SULAIMAN B. #ASAN, ABU ZUNBUR MaDARA'I, KALWAD- hani, and their dependents a million dinars. He would 1 Village near Baghdad under Kalwadha (Yaqut). * See Dozy’s Dictionary of names of garments. It seems to have been sort of silken tunic or shirt T 188 A.H. 315. Caliphate of Muqtadir. also defray the expenses of the Sultan and the pay of the officials. He also brought accusations against his chief, assert- ing that the latter had previously concealed from him his religious beliefs, but when he had come ( 167 ) to Wasit had become more communicative ; and had revealed to him that according to his system he owed Muqtadir no allegiance, and the world in general owed the 'Abbasids none ; the '' Expected Sovereign ” being the Alid who was in Qairawan, of whom Abu Tahir (the Qarmadan) was an adherent. He (Nirmani) had ascer¬ tained that his chief was a Qarmadan at heart, and that this was the reason why he had made the 'Alid 1 prince his friend and acquainted him with all his secrets. That Yusuf had no intention of moving in the direction of Hajar, his promise of doing so being only a device for securing money. He asserted that he had asked Yusuf in Rabi ii 2 what justification they could allege for dis¬ obeying the Caliph and the vizier, and when he intended starting for Hajar ? The reply had been : Why do not you understand facts ? Who intends starting for Hajar ? He had then asked Yusuf why he had deceived the Sultan with regard to his intentions, and bv pro¬ mising that he would do this secured the delivery into his hands of all the Eastern provinces ?—Yusuf had replied that he regarded it as his duty towards God Almighty to overthrow the Caliph and all the 'Abbasids who had robbed the rightful claimants, and that it would be more righteous to obey the Byzantine tyrant than to obey the Caliph. He had then objected : Suppose you do this, what assurance have you that the Qarmadan will not come to Wasit and Kufah, when you will be compelled to meet him and give him battle ?—Yusuf’s reply had been . Fool, how can I fight a man who is an adherent of the Sovereign and one of his instruments ?—His rejoinder 1 i.e the ‘Ubaidid. 2 Began June_J>, 927, Second Vizierate of 'Ali b. 'Isa. 189 had been : But suppose he wishes to fight you, what will you do then ?—Yusuf replied : There is no ground for such a supposition, for he has received a letter from the Sovereign at Qairawan forbidding him to tread the soil whereon I am to be found or to fight with me under any circumstances.—Yusuf had finished by saying : I am only waiting till all my men have received their pay for the year 314, and when they are thus fortified, I will first withhold the revenue from Wasit, Kufah and the Irrigation of the Euphrates, sending my own agents thither ; the Sultan will certainly object to my action, and thereupon I will reveal my intentions, pray publicly for the Sovereign, and invite people to his allegiance, and then march to Baghdad, where the soldiers are like women, ( 168 ) accustomed to houses overlooking the Tigris, with their drinks and their ice and their pankas, and their singing-women. I shall take possession of their goods and chattels, and not let the man of Hajar get all the glory, but myself be the man to restore the empire to the Sovereign. Abu Muslim the cobbler 1 was a man of no family, yet he achieved what we know, though when he rose he had not half the numbers that are with me. He merely made his proclamation, and a hundred thousand swordsmen gathered to him.—Mo¬ hammed b. Khalaf added : I have told his Majesty the truth about this affair, and if he appoint me vizier, Ibn Abi'l-Saj will be suppressed and his scheme frustrated. I will tamper with his troops and retainers, who will either make him prisoner, or else he will fly off to Adhar- baijan. If I am made vizier, I will renew the command to him to start for Hajar, and if he show his hand, I will counterplot him. Nasr communicated all this to Muqtadir, assuring the Caliph that Mohammed b. Khalaf had sworn that his only motives for the step which he had taken were in 1 Tabari ii. 1727 records an opinion that he was a saddler. 190 A.H. 315. Caliphate of Muqtadir. the first place religious zeal, in the second shame at the thought of this Qarmadan being able to carry out his plot against the Caliph, the court and the people.—Now iJasan b. Harun served as deputy to Mohammed b. Khalaf, before whom he regularly stood, and on whom he waited as the latter waited on Ibn Abi’l-Saj. When he saw the intimacy of Mohammed b. Khalaf with Ibn Abi’l-Saj, he became ill-disposed towards Mohammed b. Khalaf, and determined to get him arrested and ruined. He communicated his intentions to Abu Bakr Ibn al- Muntab, whom he had attached to himself and over whom he had acquired influence. It so happened that Ibn al-Muntab was drinking at Wasit with some of his friends, among whom was 'Abdallah b. 'Ali Jarjara'i, revenue-farmer of SilA and Mabarik. This person asked him to express his gratitude to i/asan b. Harun for favours conferred. Then he went on to say: And please put a letter of mine before our master Abu 'Abdallah Mohammed b. Khalaf, wherein I ask him to let #asan b. Harun know my gratitude, and to bid him increase the cause of it.— ( 169 ) Ibn al-Muntab said to him : For God’s sake do not do that, for Mohammed b. Khalaf is highly displeased with #asan b. Harun, and is very likely to have him arrested and ruined.—Jar- jara’i remembered this and used it as a means of currying favour with #asan b. Harun. Presently a dispute arose between Mohammed b. Khalaf and Jarjara’i on the subject of some moneys demanded of the latter and allocated to persons in whom Mohammed b. Khalaf was interested. Mohammed b. Khalaf began to use violent and menacing language and ordered Jarjara’i to be turned out of the room in a most humiliating fashion. Jarjara’i and #asan b. Harun then conspired against Mohammed b. Khalaf, and employed secret service men till they learned about his intrigues for obtaining the vizierate from Muqtadir, and his accusation of his chief. Jar- jara’i proceeded to inform Ibn Abi’l-Saj of this, winning Second Vizierate of ‘Ali b. 'Isa. 191 his favour thereby ; and Ibn Abi'l-Saj set detectives to spy on Mohammed b. Khalaf till he ascertained that he had repeatedly sent a confidential eunuch to Baghdad, ostensibly for the purchase of clothes, furniture, horses and slaves, but really to negotiate with Nasr in his plot against Ibn Abi’l-Saj. Ibn Abi’l-Saj ordered Jarjara'i to guard the roads through which the eunuch would travel, and flasan b. Harun to note the time at which the eunuch was despatched. When he started from Wasit, i/asan b. Harun informed Ibn Abi'l-Saj, who sent trusty agents to waylay the eunuch, arrest him on his return from Baghdad, and hand him over to JarjaraTs agent at Jarjaraya, Jarjara’i having been ordered to send some one to await him there. The letters found on the eunuch were sent to Ibn Abi’l-Saj, and they turned out to be in the writing of Nasr’s secretary, and replies to communications from Mohammed b. Khalaf, evidently referring to hints, suggestions and innuendoes, contain¬ ing designs against the life and position of Ibn Abi’l-Saj and proposals for the appropriation of his goods and chattels, with a warning not to put off the arrest of ‘Ali b. ‘Isa.—Ibn Abi'l-Saj immediately despatched H asan b. Harun to the capital (170) with the usual letters and despatches to ‘Ali b. ‘Isa, together with the actual docu¬ ments that had been seized ; bidding him add orally : This man has been plotting against my life and yours and the lives of your friends ; I wish to arrest him. His chief offence in my eyes is his plot against you.—When ‘Ali b. ‘Isa had read all the correspondence, he was amazed, and said to //asan b. Harun : Tell my brother Abu’l-Qasim 1 : If you wish to do this in order to rid yourself of this unscrupulous traitor, may you have God's help and favour ; but if you want to do it on my account, I assure you I feel gratitude to no-one so much as I do to anyone who plots to get me dismissed from the 1 i.e., Ibn Abi'l-Saj. 192 A.H. 315. Caliphate of Muqtadir. vizierate. For prison or banishment would be light compared with what I have to endure as vizier. Jarjara’i proceeded to forge letters in the name of the eunuch, ostensibly coming from Baghdad, to Mo¬ hammed b. Khalaf, to the^effect that most of what Mohammed b. Khalaf required was settled and that the eunuch would speedily return to Wasit. This quieted the apprehensions of Mohammed b. Khalaf, who pre¬ sently received a visit from Jarjara’i, who endeavoured to conciliate him, and offered a present of 100,000 dirhems of his own money if he would banish all ill-feeling against him from his mind. Mohammed b. Khalaf supposed this to be sincerely meant, and invited Jarjara’i to eat and drink with him. Hasan b. Harun immediately returned from Baghdad, and proceeded at once to the house of Mohammed b. Khalaf, before whom he stood ; Mohammed b. Khalaf said to him using a violent epithet : I have heard how you have been defaming me before ‘Ali b. Tsa, telling him that I am seeking to be made vizier in his place, and how you have besides been setting the circle of the prince 1 and his retainers against me. You hound, I shall have you beaten five hundred lashes and I shall take away from you thirty thousand dinars which have puffed you up.—All Hasan b. Harun said in reply was : God be between me and the person who has provoked my master, whose slave and nursling I am.—Mohammed b. Khalaf continued his abuse, then presently said : Have you interviewed the prince ?—(171) Not yet, he replied.— Then go to God’s curse, interview him, and come back.— Hasan b. Harun went to Ibn Abi’l-Saj and told him all he had ascertained about Mohammed b. Khalaf’s plot against him, and the reception which he had from him on his return from Baghdad. 1 Ibn Abi'l-Saj. Second Vizierate of ‘Ali b. 'Isa. 193 Ibn Abi’l-Saj then said to the Treasurer who received from Mohammed b. Khalaf the moneys transmitted to him to be spent on his master’s troops, retainers, and requirements generally : A short time ago you brought me some money, half of which was out of circulation, or spurious, or coinage of Khorasan, 1 stating that Mohammed b. Khalaf had brought it to you to spend on the officials and other purposes, and adding that the ex¬ change was ruinously high. Tell me how it is now with what he brings you.—The Treasurer replied : What he brings now is worse than ever. Out of a hundred thousand dirhems which he brought to-day I have picked out fifteen hundred that are new, two thousand that are good, though not firstrate, and forty thousand that are bad and out of circulation.—The treasurer proceeded to show how enormous was the exchange on all these coins. —Ibn Abi’l-Saj said to him : When Mohammed b. Khalaf comes this evening, do you present yourself, bringing the money just as it is, and inform me that all my retainers and troops are becoming disaffected on account of this.—The Treasurer carried out these instruc¬ tions, and Ibn Abi'l-Saj, addressing Mohammed b. Khalaf, said : You know, Abu 'Abdallah, that no-one may take money of this sort, and it would be better to make my men miss a month and then give them money that was good or approximately so.—Mohammed b. Khalaf flew into a passion and exclaimed : This hound would never have had the courage to talk to me in your presence on this matter, had he not ascertained your ill-feeling towards me ; and that ill-feeling has been fostered by the person who calculates that he will be appointed your secretary, I mean this barbarian #asan b. Harun. And little do I care for him, your treasurer, and the whole lot of your 1 In 195 Amin forbade the circulation of coins struck by his brother Ma’mun in Khorasan. Tabari iii. 795. Apparently the coinage of Khorasan got a bad name thence. 194 A.H. 315. Caliphate of Muqtadir. retainers and your troops ! I got you your post, and by Allah from now I will attend to your affairs no longer, so do what you please.—Shaking his fist in the face of Ibn Abi 1-Saj, he left the room.—Ibn Abi'l-Saj adjured him (172) to come back, but he vowed that he would n °b After a lengthy scene, when Mohammed b. Khalaf had nearly reached a vestibule, where he would have got out of sight, Ibn Abi'l-Saj called out to his slaves . Put your hands on the nape of this hound, this miscreant, this swine, and let me hear the sound of a cuff upon it !—So he was cuffed some hundred times, and his sword and belt removed. Ibn Abi'l-Saj then sum¬ moned Jarjara i (who instantly presented himself), and despatched him to the house of Mohammed b. Khalaf to secure it and arrest all his slaves and dependents and seize his treasures. Jarjara'i had a reputation for honesty and trustworthiness. Yusuf ordered Hasan b. Harun to undertake the secretaryship in place of Mohammed b. Khalaf, and made him swear that he would enter the chamber where the latter was confined and load him with fifty ratls’ weight of fetters, and clothe him in a shirt such as weavers wear.—ffasan b. Harun carried out these orders, saying to the prisoner : Tell me, Mohammed b. Khalaf, were deceived by my addressing you as Master ? I was mocking you. Which of us two was the deeper and the craftier, you or I ?—After insulting him, cuffing him and scourging him, Hasan b. Harun obtained his bond for 600,000 dinars, of which he had paid about fifty thousand by the time when Ibn Abi'l-Saj started from Wasit for Kufah to fight against the man of Hajar. Ibn Abi'l-Saj took Mohammed b. Khalaf with him in fetters ; the war prevented his thinking about him, and he himself was made prisoner whereas Mohammed b. Khalaf escaped, Second Vizierate of 'Ali b. 'Isa. 195 Account of the battle fought betiveen Ibn Abil-Saj and the Qarmatian, the imprudence displayed by the former, in making light of the enemy, resulting in his being made prisoner, and his further experiences until his execution . Yusuf b. Dewadadh (Ibn Abi’l-Saj) wrote from Wasit to the vizier 'Ali b. 'Isa, asking that money should be transmitted to him to be spent on the necessary pre¬ paration of provisions and forage between Wasit and Kufah, pleading that the revenue of the Eastern pro¬ vinces was delayed, and that the speedy approach of the man of Hajar did not permit him to wait for the arrival of the revenue from (173) the Jabal; and he added that nothing less than 100,000 dinars would be sufficient for his purpose. 'Ali b. 'Isa showed his letter to Muq- tadir, who ordered 70,000 dinars to be taken from the Private Treasury and transmitted to him. News came of the departure of Abu Tahir himself from Hajar on Wednesday—13 Ramadan (Nov. 14, 927) ; he encamped at a place called al-Hass, two days journey from al-A/^sa, where he remained till Saturday, on the morning of which he started again. The Sultan wrote to Ibn Abi’l-Saj giving news of Abu Tahir’s movements and ordering him (Ibn Abi’l-Saj) to hurry to Kufah. 'Ali b. 'Isa wrote to the authorities at Kufah, bidding them provide supplies and forage for Yusuf. The latter left Wasit on Wednesday—1 Ramadan (Nov. 28, 927), 1 in the direction of Kufah. Salamah Tuluni, who had brought him the money, left him and went home. When Abu Tahir of Hajar approached Kufah, he released all the captive pilgrims whom he had with him, while the authorities of the Sultan fled from Kufah, so that Abu Tahir was able to seize all the food and fodder got ready for Yusuf, to the amount of a hundred kurr 1 One of these dates must be wrong, since if the last night but one was a Wednesday, the last night but thirteen could not also be Wednesday. 196 A.H. 315. Caliphate of Muqtadir. of meal and a thousand kurr of barley. His own stores had by this time run low, and he with his followers had been suffering in consequence. These acquisitions gave them strength. Yusuf reached the outside of Kufah on Friday 8 Shawwal (Dec. 7, 927), to find that Abu Tahir had got there one day earlier and intercepted him. Abu Tahir is reported to have stated that on the road between Wasit and Kufah his army had come near that of Yusuf, but owing to the fog neither army saw the other. He was himself aware of the enemy's proximity, and had he wished could have attacked.—Yusuf sent to invite Abu Tahir to return to his allegiance ; if he refused, then he summoned him to battle on the Sunday.—The messenger narrated how ( 174 ) when he reached Abu Tahir s camp, he was taken into a place where there were a number of people dressed alike, and told to speak, as the Sayyid was listening ; he did not know which of them it was. He delivered his message and received the reply that the Sayyid did not accept the proposal, nor agree to delay the battle. So it commenced on Saturday 9 Shawwal (Dec. 8), at the gate of Kufah. It is said that when Ibn Abi'l-Saj saw the army of Abu Tahir and ascertained its numbers he utterly despised it, saying i Who are these dogs ? After an hour they will be in my hands.—So contemptuous was he that he ordered the bulletin of victory to be written before the engagement. The two armies then advanced. When the Hajarites heard the sound of the trumpets and drums with the shouting of the army of Ibn Abi'l- Saj, and these were very loud, one of them turning to his companion, asked What's this row ?—He replied : Funk. The other said : Aye .—He said no more. It was the practice of Abu Tahir to have no trumpets, drums or shouting in his army. Ibn Abi'l-Saj arrayed his forces, remaining at a distance himself with his retainers according to a custom of his in battle. The engagement Second Vizierate of 'Ali b. 'Isa. 197 began after sunrise on the Saturday and lasted till sunset. Ibn Abi'l-Saj displayed no lack of determination, harass¬ ing the troops of Abu Tahir with arrows, and wounding many. When this was seen by Abu Tahir, who was standing in a chariot with some two hundred trusted horsemen near the walls of al-#aiz (the Outhouse), he descended from his chariot, mounted a horse, and charged with his friends. Yusuf also charged with his retainers ; a fierce combat ensued between the two parties, and by the end of the day Ibn Abi’l-Saj was taken prisoner with a wound in his forehead. His retainers had urged him to retire, but he had declined, so he with a number of retainers fell into the hands of Abu Tahir after many (175) of his followers had been killed and the rest taken to flight. Yusuf after being taken prisoner at sunset was brought to the camp of Abu Tahir ; a tent was pitched and furnished for him, and he was guarded. They fetched a medical man named Ibn al-Subai'i, who nar¬ rates as follows : When, he said, I came into the tent where he was kept prisoner I found him seated having on him a vest of silver-coloured satin, of which the collar and chest were of red satin, stained by the blood which was flowing from the wound on his forehead. Finding that the blood on his face was congealed, I asked for some hot water, but was told by one of Abu Tahir's people that they had none, and no instrument for heating it; having left their baggage near Qadisiyyah, and with it everything that was not required for the battle. So I washed his face and wound with cold water and treated the latter. He asked my name and what I was called, and when I told him, I found that he had known my family when he was at Kufah as a lad with his brother Afshin , 1 who was governor of the place. I was surprised at his memory and his acuteness, and his indifference to his condition. 1 He is mentioned by Stephanos of Tajon as “ vostikan of the Persians before Yusuf, 118, 119. See above p.'19. 198 A.H. 315. Caliphate of Muqtadir. The report of the battle and the capture of Ibn Abi’l- Saj reaching ‘Ali b. ‘Isa, he hastened to the Palace, and together with^Nasr^the Chamberlain and Munis the^ Muzaffar proceeded to communicate the intelligence to Muqtadir. It spread fast, and high and low became terribly afraid of Abu Tahir. The whole population bethought them of migrating to Wasit and then to Ahwaz. Mu nis pitched his camp on the Ushnan 1 parade-ground, with the intention oLmarching to Kufah. There came however a despatch from the governor of Qasr Ibn Hubairah to ‘Ali b. ‘Isa, informing him that Abu T ahir and his followers had left Kufah on Tuesday 12 Shawwal, (Dec. 11, 927) in the direction of ‘Ain Tamr. ‘Ali b! Isa hastened to hire five hundred boats (176) wherein he embarked a thousand men, and a number of barges and launches, which he made cross from the Tigris to the Euphrates, wherein he embarked a company of the H ujari retainers, who were to prevent the Hajarites from crossing the latter river ; he also ordered various commanders to go by land from Baghdad to Anbar to guard the latter. On the Friday the people of Anbar and the com¬ manders there saw the cavalry of Abu Tahir advancing from the Western side, and they hastened to break down the Anbar bridge. Abu Tahir waited until he was able to cross by boats, and on the following Tuesday a hundred of his men crossed that way, unperceived by the Sultan’s followers, until they had reached Anbar. An engagement then commenced between them and some of the commanders. When the place was cleared of the Sultan’s troops, Abu Tahir restored the bridge of Anbar, and crossed leaving his baggage on the Western bank, and with it Ibn Abi’l-Saj. When the imperial troops on the launches learned that Abu Tahir had re¬ stored the bridge, they went by night and set fire to it. 1 A bridge of this name is mentioned by Yaqut and located by Le Strange. Second Vizierate of 'Ali b. 'Isa. 199 Thus Abu Tahir with part of his followers was left on the Eastern bank of the Euphrates, while his baggage was on the Western bank ; and the launches and barges were between. When the news of Abu Tahir's crossing to Anbar and slaughter of the commanders there came to the capital, Nasr the Chamberlain started out with the H ujari troops, the Masaffi infantry, and all the com¬ manders left in Baghdad, preceded by the imperial ensign, which is like any other standard, only black in colour, with the legend in white Mohammed is the Apostle of God. Mu'nis had already arrived at the gate of Anbar, and his forces united with those of Nasr ; the cavalry, infantry and other ranks with them amounted in numbers to over 40,000 men. Abu’l-Haija and his brothers Abu’l- Walid, Abu’l-'Ala, and Abu'l-Saraya came out with his friends and Arabs. Nasr arrived before Mu'nis at the bridge of the canal called Zubara in the region of ‘Aqr Qub some two parasangs from Baghdad ; 1 presently Mu'nis came up with him, and their forces united on the canal. (177) Abu’l-Haija advised Nasr the Chamber- lain to destroy the bridge over the Zubara, and indeed insisted on this. When he found Nasr in no hurry to adopt the suggestion, he said : 0 Ustadh, cut it and cut my heard at the same time. 2 Nasr then had the bridge destroyed. Abu Tahir with those of his followers who were with him on the Eastern bank of the Euphrates proceeded in the direction of the Zubara ; when he had got to the distance of one parasang from the imperial army, at the end of Monday 10 Dhu'l-Qa'dah (Jan. 5, 927), 3 he spent the night where he was, and started early next day in the direction of the Zubara bridge. A black foot-soldier advanced in front of the army, and became a mark for 1 If this be the 'Aqr quf of Yaqut, (Akker Kuf) four parasangs is another estimate. 2 A terrible form of dishonour. 3 According to Wdstenfeld this day was a Sunday. 200 A.H. 315. Caliphate of Muqtadir. the imperial archers, and though he got to look like a porcupine with the arrows that stuck in him, he advanced undismayed, only returning when he had begun to mount the bridge and found that it had been cut. Abu Tahir’s followers tried for some time to ford the water of the canal, but, when they found that it could nowhere be forded, they retreated, without however turning their backs. When they reached #asaniyyah, they found it surrounded by water, Nasr and Mu’nis having previously sent and made wide breaches in the embankments, so that the water of the Makhr surrounded Abu Tahir’s army. He remained there the Tuesday, and then pro¬ ceeded with his followers to Anbar ; none of the imperial forces ventured to follow him, or repair the bridge over the Zubara or cross it. Abu’l-Haija’s advice that the bridge should be cut proved to have been a divine in¬ spiration , for had it remained standing, the Parmafians would have crossed by it, nor would they have been dismayed by the numbers of the imperial forces. Those forces would have been routed, and the Qarmadans would have taken Baghdad. For indeed most of the imperial troops fled in disorder to Baghdad when they heard that Abu Tahir had reached the canal, before they had actually cast eyes on the enemy. So terrible was the alarm that filled their breasts after the catastrophe ^ which had befallen Ibn Abi’l-Saj. None among them after that imagined that he would be able to stand against Abu Tahir. (178) Abu Tahir had with him a number of guides, who led him away from the Makhr ; and he marched in the direction of Anbar. When he and his followers abandoned their encampment by the Zubara, the imperial forces raised loud shouts and cheers, with the view of spreading the intelligence. The despatch-riders hastened to bring ‘Ali b. Tsa the news that they were safe , that Abu Tahir had departed and was retreating to Anbar, that there was no road, ford, or device, whereby Second Vizierate of 'Ali b. ‘Isa. 201 he could reach his camp, or approach Baghdad. Mu’nis was anxious to capture his baggage with the portion of his force which he had left on the Western side of Anbar, and to rescue Ibn Abi’l-Saj. So he despatched his chamberlain Yalbaq and a number of commanders and retainers of Ibn Abi’l-Saj with six thousand men, thinking Abu Tahir would be unable to cross the Euphrates and rejoin his cavalry and baggage. Abu Tahir, hearing of this, devised a scheme whereby he got separated from his troops, and after walking a long distance reached the deserted region which abuts on the Euphrates ; he there crossed in the boat of a fisherman to whom he is said to have paid a thousand dinars, and got back to his baggage. Having rejoined his followers, he proceeded to offer battle to Yalbaq, who made little resistance, and took to flight, losing a great many men. Abu Tahir happened to notice Ibn Abi’l-Saj outside the tent in which he had been confined, and looking towards the road to see how the battle was going. It occurred to Abu Tahir that his prisoner was trying to escape. So he summoned him into his presence and said : You wanted to run away, did you ? (Others say that Ibn Abi’l-Saj’s retainers had called out to him, and the Qarmafian said : You wanted to be rescued by your retainers, did you ?) He then ordered the prisoner’s throat to be cut in his presence, and the throats of other captives besides. After this Abu Tahir devised a scheme which enabled him to get all those troops who had been with him on the Eastern bank of the Euphrates at Anbar across the river to the Western side which is contiguous with the desert. Yalbaq returned to Mu’nis the Muzaffar in a disorderly rout. ( 179 ) Abu’l-Qasim Ibn Zanji states that the number of Abu Tahir’s" followers was fifteen hundred, seven hundred: horse and eight hundred foot; and that he 202 A.H. 315. Caliphate of Muqtadir. got this information from a man of Anbar, who acted as spy for him and his troops. (Others put the number at seventeen hundred.) He adds : I heard one of the deserters from Abu Tahir, when asked why the imperial forces had taken to flight so quickly, whereas the forces of Abu Tahir had been so stedfast, reply : The reason is that the imperial forces suppose safety to be found in flight, to- which therefore they give the preference, whereas we suppose it to lie in stedfastness, whence we stand firm and do not budge. Ali b. Isa organized between the Zubara and Baghdad a series of posts, with a hundred pigeons and a man to each pigeon, whose business it was to send despatches on the wings of these birds every hour about the enemy’s movements. That Baghdad remained safe on the day when the Qarmafians advanced to the Zubara notwith¬ standing the number of highwaymen and men mas¬ querading as soldiers, all anxious to plunder the city was due to the instructions given by ‘Ali b. ‘Isa to Nazuk to patrol with his whole force both morning and evening au bo J; h Sldes of the river. Further on the day when Abu Tahir advanced to the Zubara the vizier ordered Nazuk to take his whole force early in the morning to the Harb Gate, and remain -there till evening; and to have continuous proclamation made on both sides that any highwayman or person masquerading as a soldier who was discovered and any one found to be in posses¬ sion of a weapon should be beheaded. So the highway¬ men kept in their dens, and the tradesmen of Muhaw- wal Gate, the Tabiq Canal, the Qalla’in and other quarters shut up their shops, transferred their goods to their residences, and mounted guard. The leading in¬ habitants collected boats which they floated on the canals that communicate with the Tigris ( 180 ) and embarked their goods. Some took them down the river to Wasit. Some who were prepared for emergencies transferred their Second Vizierate of 'Ali b. 'Isa. 203 goods to #ulwan, that they might travel with the pilgrims to Khorasan. No-one high or low had any doubt that the Qarmadans would take Baghdad. Nazuk in accordance with 'Ali b. 'Isa's orders remained on horse¬ back from early morning till the first part of the night was passed ; neither he nor his followers dismounted except to perform their devotions. Tents were pitched for him and them to occupy at night. These measures kept the town safe. The Qarmadan next made Hit his objective. Harun b. Gharib and Sa'id b. #amdan hurried to the defence of the place and arrived before him. Mounting its walls they put heart into the inhabitants, who when the Qarmadan arrived fought him with artillery ; many of the Qarmadans were killed and Abu Tahir raised the siege. When the news of this reached Baghdad, general relief was felt ; Muqtadir and the Queen-mother when they heard of his departure gave a hundred thousand dirhems in charity. Mu’nis and Nasr had produced the rolls of the troops who had been amassed on the Baghdad side of the Zubara, taking no account of the Arabs, and exclusive of their own retainers and dependents, and found their number to have been 42,000 ; that of the retainers and dependents 1 was many times more. When 'Ali b. Tsa heard of the capture of Ibn Abi'l- Saj, he immediately went to Muqtadir and addressed him as follows : The former Caliphs hoarded money for the sole purpose of suppressing the enemies of our re¬ ligion, such as the Khawarij , and protecting Islam and the Moslems. Now since the demise of the Blessed Prophet no more serious disaster has befallen the Moslems than this. For this man (Abu Tahir) is an infidel, who attacked the pilgrims in the year 311, in an unheard-of fashion. Terror of him has gained possession of the hearts of your servants and of high and low. Now 1 i.e., of minor commanders. 204 A.H. 315. Caliphate of Muqtadir. Mu'tadid and Muktafi hoarded treasure ( 181 ) in their private Treasury for emergencies of this style. Not very much at present remains in the private Treasury. Fear God, O Commander of the Faithful, and speak to is a pious and excellent woman, and if she has any hoard which she has amassed against any necessity that may overtake her or the empire, then this is the time to bring it out. And if the other thing come about, then do thou depart with thy company to the remotest parts of Khorasan. And now I have given thee true counsel and advice.—The Caliph visited his mother and presently returned to say that she on con¬ sultation with himself had ordered the transference of half a million dinars of her own to the public Treasury, to be spent on the troops. He then asked 'Ali b. ‘Isa how much remained in the private Treasury, and was told by him that there was half a million there. The vizier set to work to economize, and ordered that not a dirhem of this money should be wasted on commissions ; he also collected the money due from the provinces, sending persons to urge the local officials to pay it in.’ Thus he got together another sum. A certain trades¬ man warned ‘Ali b. 'Isa that he had ascertained that a man from Shiraz acted as secret-service man for the Qarmafian, and corresponded with him. The vizier sent a party to arrest him and bring him to the Palace. Ques¬ tioned by ‘Ali b. ‘Isa in the presence of the q a A Abu Umar and the commanders, this person said : I am a follower of Abu Tahir and my reason for following him is that he is in the right, whereas you, your master, and your adherents, are lying unbelievers. In God’s world there must always be His representative and a just sovereign of His appointment; our sovereign is the Mahdi so-and-so son of so-and-so son of Isma'il son of Ja'far ; we are not like the foolish Rafidis, who would have men swear allegiance to a sovereign who is absent Second Vizierate of 'Ali b. 'Isa. 205 and awaited. 1 —'Ali b. 'Isa said to him : Give me a true list of the people in Baghdad and Kufah who are in cor¬ respondence with the Qarma/ian.—And why, he retorted, should I give you a list of true believers to be delivered into the hands of infidels, to put them to death ? Never ! —The vizier ordered the man to be cuffed in his presence, then scourged, fettered and laden with a heavy iron collar, and gagged with a chain. He was then delivered to Nazuk ( 182 ) and imprisoned in the Gaol. He died at the end of eight days, having refused to eat or drink. The army mutinied. Year 316. On Thursday 3 MuAarram (Feb. 27, 928) 2 Mu'nis the Muzaffar arrived in Baghdad, having been preceded by Na$r. There had been a mutiny in Anbar, for higher pay ; these demands were maintained in Baghdad, and an extra dinar a head was offered them, which they accepted. 3 News came that Abu Tahir had entered Dali yah 4 on the Euphrates Road, and finding nothing there, had slain a number of the inhabitants. Thence he proceeded to Ra//bah, which he entered after encountering resistance from the inhabitants, whom he massacred after taking the place. Mu'nis the Mumffar was invited to go and meet the Oarmadans, at Raqqah. The inhabitants of Qarqisia had sent a deputation to the Qarmadan soliciting his protection ; he made them fair promises, then sent a herald to proclaim that no-one there was to show himself in the dav; and no-one ventured to do so.—A raiding party sent by him crossed 1 This is a very early reference to the doctrine now known as that of the Ithna'sharis. 2 A Wednesday according to Wiistenfeld. 8 Doubtless per month. * West bank, between Ra/ibah and 'Anah. Yaqut. 206 A.H. 316. Caliphate of Muqtadir. the river on a bridge erected by him at Rahbah, and effected a great massacre of the Arabs, whose camels and sheep he seized. The Arabs conceived very great fear of him, and thought it unlucky to hear his name mentioned. He imposed tribute upon them, one dinar a year on each tent, which they pay to this day. He then proceeded northwards to Raqqah. Mu’nis marched to Mausil, and thence to Raqqah, whence Abu Tahir departed by the Euphrates road, till he reached Rahbah. There he embarked his ( 183 ) stores, &c. in boats, and descended partly by water and partly by land with the view of revisiting Hit. The inhabitants of this place had erected on their wall both large and small machines for hurling projectiles and resisted him, killing some of his men ; so he departed thence in the direction of Kufah. This movement was noised abroad, so Bunayy b. Nafis and Harun b. Gharib were despatched in Nasr’s van. The Oarmadan cavalry with Ibn Sanbar advanced to Qasr Ibn Hubairah, where they crossed the Euphrates by a ford, and killed a number of the inhabitants of the Qasr. Nasr the Chamberlain marched out with the commanders and the Masaffi infantry with the intention of engaging Abu Tahir ; Nasr had a sharp attack of fever, yet that did not prevent him from proceeding to Sora. Abu Tahir reached the bank of the river at Sora at sunset. Nasr was then so ill that he was unable to mount his horse ; so he appointed Ahmad b. Kaigha- lagh to take his place, putting him at the head of the army. The Qarmadan however departed before this commander could engage him. Nasr's illness grew worse, his tongue drying up with fever ; he was sent home to Baghdad in a litter, and died on the wav. Shafi‘ Muqtadiri came out to the army with an order from Muqtadir that Harun b.. Gharib was to take the command in lieu of Nasr ; and the new commander brought the army back to Baghdad, Second Vizierate of 'Ali b. ‘Isa. 207 Account of the events which led to the dismissal of ‘Ali h. 'Isa, and the appointment of Abu ‘Ali Ibn Muqlah. ( 184 ) ‘Ali b. ‘Isa was aware of the disorganization of the provinces during the ministries of Khaqani and Khasibi; and when he found that the additional pay conceded to the infantry after their return from fighting with the Qarmadans at Anbar came to 240,000 dinars a year in addition to the enormous current expenditure, he was alarmed and terrified thereat ; finding further that the imperial troops were no match for the Qarmadans, and that he had incurred the displeasure of Nasr the Cham¬ berlain, owing to the favour wherewith he was regarded by Mu’nis, he asked Muqtadir's permission to retire from the vizierate. Muqtadir bade him stay on, saying to him : You stand to me in the relation of Mutadid, and I have a claim upon your services} He continued however to press for permission, and Muqtadir consulted Mu’nis the Mu^affar, informing the latter that three persons had been nominated for the office : al-Fadl b. Ja‘far Ibn #inzabah. Mu’nis did not advise his appointment, because of the members of the Furat family who had been put to death. Abu ‘Ali Ibn Muqlah. Mu’nis did not advise his appointment, owing to his youth. For the vizierate, he said, there is required a man of mature years, who has acquired renown, and possesses talent. Mohammed b. Khalaf Nirmani. Mu’nis did not advise his appointment, assuring the Caliph that he was an ignorant man, incapable of spelling his own name, and reckless. Mu’nis then advised that ‘Ali b. ‘Isa should be coaxed to continue in office ; and he himself, meeting the vizier, endeavoured to do this. ‘Ali b. ‘Isa said to Mu’nis : If you were remaining in the capital, I could rely on 1 Mu'tatfid was the Caliph’s father, and the person who had restored th after which Muqtadir ordered that a proclamation should be made before him : Whoever brings a prisoner shall have ten dinars, and whoever brings a head shall have five ; and this proclamation was made.—Then a note came for him, which was handed to him, and which he read; he then called MufliA and Qararid, and whispered into their ears, and then called the vizier and did the like. The vizier made a reply which was not heard. Then there came another note, which he also read. Then came oral messages publicly delivered from the generals, which the people could hear, to the effect that the soldiers engaged were saying : We want to see our sovereign, that we may fling ourselves upon these hounds.—Qararifi and the others kept imploring him to go, and assuring him that there was no difficulty, till at last he started with MufliA and those who remained with him. Only al-Fa^l b. Ja'far hung back and went towards the river-bank. Before however Muqtadir could reach the battle-field his followers had been driven off it and been routed, the last person who remained fighting vigorously being Mohammed b. Yaqut. AAmad b. Kaighalagh and other generals were taken prisoner. Muq¬ tadir on his way to the battle-field, and before he had reached it, was met by ‘Ali b. Yalbaq they were on (237) an expanse of country. When Ali's eye fell on the Caliph, he dismounted, being fully armed, and cried : My lord, the Commander of the Faithful! and proceeded to kiss the ground and then the Caliph's knee. Just then the Berber followers of Mu'nis came up, and sur- 1 Son of Mu'nis's chief adherent. Death of Muqtadir. 267 rounded Muqtadir ; one of them struck him from behind a blow that brought him to the ground. He cried out : Curse you, I am the Caliph ! The Berber said : It's you I'm after ! He made the Caliph lie on the ground and cut his throat with a sword. With the Caliph there was a vice-chamberlain who flung himself on the Berber and had his throat cut also. The head of Muqtadir was raised upon a sword, then upon a stake ; he was stripped of his clothing, even his drawers, and left stark naked till a labouring man who passed by covered him with hay, and dug a grave for him where he lay, buried him, and obliterated the traces. 1 Yalbaq and his son ‘Ali went to repose in their tents, and men were at once sent to the Palace to guard it. Mu’nis came down the river from Rashidiyyah to Sham- masiyyah, where he spent the night; 'Abd al-Wahid son of Muqtadir, MufM, Harun b. Gharib, Mohammed b. Yaqut, and the two sons of Ra'iq went by land to Mada’in. The procedure of Mu'nis in letting the face of Muq¬ tadir be struck with the sword, and letting him be killed, followed by his entry of Baghdad in this style, emboldened the enemies to achieve what they had never aspired to ; to take possession of the capital. Since that time the Caliphate has been weakened and the Caliph's authority been shattered. This process kept on increasing till it reached the state which we hope presently to describe. (238) Thabit tells a story of Muqtadir's waste of the revenue which I have thought well to transcribe at length, that no sovereign or public administrator may be deceived by the richness of his resources, and forget to fertilize them, or take his ease and be slothful when he should be toiling thereat. If he acts thus, he may hurry but he will not overtake. His state will be comparable 1 In ‘Arib’s account the Caliph fights bravely, but his authorities agree that he was most unwilling to take part in the battle. 268 A.H. 320. Death of Muqtadir. to the breach in a dyke which starts with the diameter of a dirhem, and then expands and cannot be repaired. I—I am here speaking in my own person—once warned an administrator in this way, and emphasized my warning. He only smiled, proud in the possession of vast treasures and stores. Two years had not passed before I saw him in a pitiable condition, wherein pity would do no good. I will tell his story in due course. Muqtadir wasted more than seventy million dinars in addition to what he spent on proper objects and in the right places. That is a larger amount than had been hoarded by Rashid for his successors, though among all the ‘Abbasids none hoarded more than he. When Qasim b. ‘Ubaidallah was asked by Mu'tadid concerning the amount left by each of the ‘Abbasids, he replied that none had left more than Rashid, who had left in his Treasury forty-eight million dinars. The following is a copy of a statement drawn up by one of the clerks of Abu’l-i/asan Ibn al-Furat when he was appointed vizier by Muqtadir. In the Name of God, etc* Amount in the private Treasury when Muqtadir assumed the Caliphate : Fourteen million dinars. Abu’l-#asan Ibn al-Furat reconquered the provinces of Fars and Kirman in the year 299, and the revenue thence produced every year out of the kharaj , the Public Lands, and the lands known as the Princes* was 23,800,000 dirhems. Of this the revenue of Fars was 18,000,000 dirhems, and that of Kirman 5,000,000 dir¬ hems. (239) In the space of twenty-one years, ending with the kharaj year 320, after deducting 800,000 dirhems as unpaid arrears for each year, this produces a total of 483,000,000 dirhems. If we deduct from this the amount paid by the conquerors of Fars and Kirman yearly into the Public Treasury at the capital, about 4,000,000, amounting in the course of these years to 83,000,000 dirhems, there remains 400,000,000 dirhems, worth 28,000,000 dinars. 269 Death of Muqtadir. From the revenues of Egypt and Syria there was a surplus as compared with what they produced in the days of Mu'tadid, amounting to 3,600,000 dinars. Muqtadir realized out of the fines which he imposed upon Ibn al-Furat and his clerks and dependents 4,400,000 dinars. On the first occasion 2,300,000 dinars. On the second 1,100,000 dinars. On the third including what he took from the wife of MuAassin and Daulah 900,000 dinars. Revenue produced by the lands of Ibn al-Furat that had been privately owned, exclusive of fiefs, and lands leased for a fixed amount, during seventeen years, account being taken of such lands as were sold, delivered in fief or leased for a fixed amount to members of the court, at the rate of 250,000 dinars a year, 4,250,000 dinars. Amount realized by the confiscation of the estate of Abu 'Abdallah al-Jassas al-Jauhari, 1 exclusive of his own exaggerations, 2,000,000 dinars. Amount realized on the lands of 'Abbas b. #asan after he had been put to death, and for a period of twenty-four years, at the rate of 120,000 dinars a year, 2,880,000 dinars. 1 ( 240 ) Property which had belonged to //amid b. 'Abbas and been confiscated, together with the revenue of his lands until they were restored to his children, 2,200,000 dinars. Property that had belonged to the Madara'is, #usain b. A/hnad and Mohammed b. 'Ali, and had been confis¬ cated in the days of the vizierate of Abu 'Ali Khaqani, the three vizierates of Ibn al-Furat, and in the days of Abu’l-Qasim Khaqani and Abu’l-'Abbas Khasibi, in the second vizierate of 'Ali b. ‘Isa, and that of Ibn Muqlah, 1,300,000 dinars. 1 See above, p. 35 . 2 There should be 80,000 more. 270 A.H. 320. Death of Muqtadir. Moneys obtained from ‘Ali b. ‘Isa, Ibn al-Z/awari, and other clerks and heads of departments who were fined, 2,000,000 dinars. Moneys obtained from the inheritance of Rasibi, 500,000 dinars. 1 Moneys obtained from the inheritance of Ibrahim Misma'i, 300,000 dinars. Moneys obtained from sales in the days of the various viziers and increased by al-Fa^l b. Ja'far, 3,000,000 dinars. Money obtained from the estates of Umm Musa, her brother, her sister, and her dependents, 2,000,000 dinars. The whole amount of cash comes to 68,430,000 dinars. 2 Deduct therefrom the revenue of the lands sold from the year 317 to the end of 320 at the rate (approximately right) of 900,000 dinars a year : 3,600,000 dinars. There remains after that as the amount which went into the Treasury of Muqtadir over and above what was transmitted to the Private Treasury in the days of Mu'tacfid and Muktafi out of the revenues of the Estates and the kharaj of the Sawad, Ahwaz, the East and the West, 64,830,000 dinars. Now it had been the ( 241 ) practice of both Mu'tadid and Muktafi to save a million dinars each year of their Caliphate out of the revenue of the provinces after paying the stipends of the soldiers, retainers, eunuchs and court attendants and all extra¬ ordinary expenditure in addition to what they found hoarded in the Private Treasury. Had Muqtadir saved in like fashion, the amount in twenty-five years would have reached 25,000,000 dinars. 1 See above p. 25. 2 It is evident that some items have been omitted by the copyists, as the figures actually given come to 56,430,000 ; there are besides some errors in the totals where the details of a suni are given, probably due to careless copying also. Death of Muqtadir. 271 The whole sum then which ought to have been stored in Muqtadir s Treasury during these years to the end of 320 would have been 89,830,000 dinars. Deduct thence sums not squandered, but spent on three accessions, 1 and on the re-conquest of Fars and Kirman, over 10,000,000 dinars ; there remains over 70,000,000 dinars all of it squandered and wasted. The duration of the vizierate of Abu'l-FatA al-Fadl b. Ja far to Muqtadir was five months and twenty-nine days. 1 fiis own first and second and tf^e first of Qahir, Chapter II. The Caliphate of al-Qahir Billah Abu Mansur Mohammed son of Mu'tadid. In the Year 320. When Muqtadir was put to death and his head brought into the presence of Mu'nis, he burst into tears, saying : You have killed him ! By Allah we shall all be killed ! The least you can do is to declare that this hap¬ pened without any intention on your part , or any order ; and to place on the throne his son Abu Abbas y for he is my nursling ; and if he be seated thereon , his grandmother , Muqtadir s mother , his brothers , and (242) his father's retainers will be willing to spend money . This proposal was opposed by Abu Ya'qub Ishaq b. Isma'il Nubakhti partly because of its wisdom, but also owing to what had been foreordained by the Almighty. He said : After all the trouble which it has taken us to get rid of a sovereign with a mother and an aunt and eunuchs are we going to have the same thing again ? He urged his views upon Mu'nis and his dependents till he had brought them to reject AbuVAbbas and made them inclined to favour Mohammed son of Mu'tadid ; so that that might be accomplished which had been foreordained, that Mu’nis should die by his hand. To that assembly there came Bowl-face Fa'iq of the haram, who toldMu'nis that when the Queen-mother heard of her son's death she wanted to fly, but that he had put her under surveil¬ lance and made sure of her. He added that Mohammed son of Mu'ta^id and Mohammed son of Muktafi were in his custody. Mu'nis sent him to fetch them, and he brought them up stream to the palace of Mu'nis after Second Vizierate of Ibn Muqlah. 273 rele^ing Mu’nis’s servant Bushra. 1 Mu’nis first a dressed himself to Mohammed son of Muktafi, who declined the office, saying that his uncle had a better c aim. Mu’nis then addressed Mohammed son of ,- d ’ Wh ° acce P ted J he was made to take an oath of fidelity to Mu’nis the Muzaffar, Yalbaq, his son ‘Ali, and YaAya b. ‘Abdallah Tabari, Yalbaq’s clerk. When they had made sure of him by oaths and covenants, they did homage to him, and the like was done by the judges and commanders present. He took the title al-Qahir Billah (The Conqueror by God). It was the morning of Thursday — 2 Shawwal (Nov. 1 , 932). Mu’nis advised that ‘Ali b. ‘Isa be appointed his vizier, and eulogized his integrity, uprightness, orthodoxy and piety , but Yalbaq and his son objected that the time did not admit of ‘Ali b. ‘Isa’s ways ; it required some one who was more liberal and less strict. He then nominated Ibn Muqlah with Abu’l-Qasim Kalwadhani as his deputy until he arrived from Fars. This arrangement was rati¬ fied by Mu’nis, who wrote to Ibn Muqlah bidding him hasten, and to Yaqut to send him with all speed. Qahir went downstream to the Palace, and mounted the stairs ; Mu’nis and his dependents also descended to their homes. Mohammed son of Muktafi was sent off to his apartment in the palace of Ibn Tahir. Qahir proceeded to appoint as his chamberlain (243) ‘Ali b. Yalbaq, who made Abu ‘Ali Hasan b. Harun his secre¬ tary. Mu nis the Mu^affar sent to fetch ‘Ali b. ‘Isa from Safiyah, and a message was sent him also by Qahir through i/asan b. Harun, summoning him. He inter¬ viewed Mu nis first, then went down stream to Qahir, —of whom he had an audience, in which he was respect¬ fully addressed by the Caliph ; this was prior to the arrival of Ibn Muqlah. Mu’nis also summoned Kal¬ wadhani and went down with him to the Palace, where 1 His arrest was described above, p. 222. 274 A.H. 320. Second Caliphate of Qahir. he introduced him to Qahir, whom he informed that he had appointed Ibn Muqlah vizier, and Kalwadhani his deputy until the other arrived. Qahir bade the latter move into the apartment of Mufli^ in order that he might be at hand when the Caliph required him. He did this, and received congratulatory visits from the heads of the bureaux, and proceeded to issue orders and prohibitions. Qahir now devoted his attention to discovering which of Muqtadir's women and children were in hiding, and to examining his (Muqtadir’s) mother, who was seriously ill with a broken constitution and the commencement of dropsy. Moreover when she learned of her son being put to death, and not properly buried, she became desperate, bruised her face and head, and would neither eat nor drink until she nearly died. The new Caliph treated her with gentleness until she had taken a little bread and salt and drunk a little water. Then he sum¬ moned her and tried to make her reveal her treasures, at one time with gentleness, at another with threats ; but she declared on oath that she had no money, nor gems, only some boxes containing ornaments and wearing apparel, household goods and perfume. These boxes were, she said, in an apartment adjoining that wherein she resided in the Palace. She showed him the apart¬ ment and the boxes, and said : Had I possessed any money, I should not have delivered my son to his death. —Thereupon the Caliph smote her with his hand, had her suspended by one foot, and beat her mercilessly on the soft parts of the body ; he showed no gratitude for the kindness which she had done him when he was imprisoned by Muqtadir. 1 By inflicting these tortures he did not discover more than she had confessed of her own free will. When the first day of Dhu'l-Qa‘dah came (Nov. 3, 932) the Palace was visited by Yalbaq, his son ‘Ali, and Kalwadhani, who, being admitted to 1 See above, p. 225. Second Vizierate of Ibn Muqlah. 275 the Caliph s presence, demanded a sum of money to be furnished to Mu nis the Mu^affar, to be expended on the accession-gift. (244) The Caliph told them what he had done to the mother of Muqtadir, how with his own hand he had scourged her a hundred times on the soft parts of her body with intent to make her confess, and how she had not confessed to the possession of a single dirhem besides what she had admitted possessing of her own free will. But, he added, she is in your hands.— Then he took them to the apartment which contained the boxes, and there they found embroidery and satin of Rum and Tustar, heavily adorned with gold, carpets of leather and striped silken and woollen fabrics, and satin ; some of the chests contained magnificent wearing apparel, and a few gold ornaments, with many silver ornaments, a great deal of perfume, such as Indian wood, ambergris, musk, camphor, and camphor dolls. The worth of the whole was about 130,000 dinars, ex¬ clusive of the dolls, which were worth 30,000 dirhems. Mu’nis the Mu^affar took possession of most of it to sell; some however was left for the use of Qahir. Fines were imposed upon all Muqtadir's dependents. Al-Fa^l b. JaTar came out of concealment; and Mu’nis with Yalbaq and his son tried to protect him ; but when they spoke to Qahir on his behalf, the Caliph urged that he had been Muqtadir's vizier and must be fined. He offered 20,000 dinars, to be paid at once. Mu'nis said he would pay the money for him, as he was a trust¬ worthy, honest and pious clerk. He ordered that he should be made president of the bureau of the lands seized from Muqtadir's mother, and of the property taken from Muqtadir's children and other dependents. He was treated with profound respect and when he went to Kalwadhani, the deputy vizier rose both on his entry and at his departure. Qahir confirmed him in the presidency of the bureaux which have been mentioned, and he took 276 A.H. 320. Second Caliphate of Qahir. them over ; but he made little of them, since, having yesterday been Muqtadir's vizier, he did not like to be put in charge to-day of the bureau of the property seized from that Caliph's mother, children and dependents. So Kalwadhani summoned Hisham and made him controller of those bureaux, while he appointed Abu Mohammed Madara'i president of the bureau of first instance. The duration of al-Fadl’s presidency of these offices was seventeen days. The fine imposed on Abu Bakr I bn Q arab ah 1 had acquired notoriety, and the fact besides that he had only paid ninety thousand dinars of it ; and the rest was demanded of him. 2 Qahir also brought Muqtadir's mother out of her prison to call (245) on the Judges and certified witnesses to attest that she recalled her pious trusts, and appointed as her agent for the sale of them ‘Ali b. 'Abbas Nubakhti. She was questioned on this matter, but declined, asserting that she had created of the property a trust for the benefit of the sick and poor of Meccah and the frontiers, and did not regard it as lawful to cancel the act. But, she said, as for my un¬ settled properties, I appoint 'Ali b. 'Abbas agent for their sale.—The qa^i 'Umar b. Mohammed rose with the wit¬ nesses and went into the presence of Qahir, who bade them testify that he had cancelled her deeds of trust, and that he appointed 'Ali b. 'Abbas agent for their sale, and for the sale of other private lands, lands origin¬ ally in the possession of Ibn al-Furat, and his brother 'Abbas, lands newly acquired and lands taken back and the like in all the provinces ; and that he appointed Abu Talib Nubakhti, Ishaq b. Isma'il and Abu’l- Faraj Jalakht agents for the sale of productive proper¬ ties in the capital, and of “ differences between the two systems ” 3 which they were able to sell. The dependents of Mu'nis perceived that the sales would never be effected 1 The text has Yaqut by mistake. 2 See above, p. 231. * See above, p. 200. Second Vizierate of Ibn Muqlah. 277 unless the vendors began by selling to them ; so they made purchases to the value of about half a million dinars. Abu ‘Ali Ibn Muqlah arrived on the Day of Sacrifice (10 Dhu Kffijjah 320=Dec. 12, 932). He had written to Qahir requesting that an audience might be given him at night, as he had elected to meet him when Capricorn was in the ascendant, with one of the Sa'd's therein, and the other in the middle of the sky. He arrived at the time which he had proposed, and found Qahir awaiting him ; after his audience he found on leaving the imperial presence that the apartment of Harun son of Muqtadir had been prepared for him, and furnished. So he entered it, and in it made certain appointments of officials ; the next day his robes of honour as vizier were bestowed on him, he went to greet Munis the Mu^affar at his palace, and returned to his quarters. People then began to pay him visits of con¬ gratulation, and at the end of the day there came ‘Ali b. ‘Isa, for whom Ibn Muqlah did not rise, which pro¬ voked unfavourable comment. (246) Another visitor was Abu Bakr Ibn Qarabah, who fulfilled his promise of doing business with him and returning to his “ meddling/' as was set forth above. 1 Year 321. Ibn Muqlah had a grievance against Kalwadhani, which was that after being appointed his deputy the latter had made no inquiries about his brothers, children, women or dependents, had not gone to his house, appointed any of his dependents to an office, or bestowed any gift on his women and children. More serious than all this was the fact that when Abu ‘Abdallah Ibn Thawabah had asked Kalwadhani's permission, when the latter was Ibn Muqlah's deputy, to mention his kunyah in the letters sent to the provincial governors, 1 See pp. 231. 232, 278 A.H. 321. Second Caliphate of Qahir. it had been refused ! So Ibn Muqlah arrested Kal- wadhani, and his dependents, this act being the first thing with which he reproached him. He obtained Kalwadhani's bond for 200,000 dinars, and removed him with his clerk and his dependents to the house of Ibn Qarabah. He proceeded to arrest various officials and bureau clerks, among them Ishaq b. Isma‘il Nubakhti, and the Baridis, whose farming-contracts he gave to Mohammed b. Khalaf Nirmani, for an additional pay¬ ment of 300,000 dinars ; this person, also^guaranteed to extract from them fines to the amount of 600,000 dinars, and so they were delivered into his power and he took them to his house. In all these proceedings Ibn Qarabah acted as intermediary ; Mohammed b. Khalaf, having placed them in confinement in his house, separated them from each other. In addition to these functions Ibn Muqlah bestowed on Mohammed b. Khalaf the ministry of public security. IsAaq b. Isma‘il and the Baridis, knowing the recklessness and ruthlessness of Mohammed b. Khalaf, were in fear of their lives. Abu ‘Abdallah Baridi took to cajoling Mohammed b. Khalaf, and tried to mollify him, suggesting that he might act as Mohammed's agent, in which case he would see that the revenue of the provinces which he farmed was forthcoming (247) with the increase, which Mohammed had promised ; that he would obey him in financial matters and execute his orders without opposition. Mohammed b. Khalaf in consequence treated him humanely, alone among the party ; he tortured the two brothers of Abu ‘Abdallah Baridi, suspending from them jars that had been filled, and putting them in stocks. They refused to pay anything. He kept IsAaq b. Isma‘il in close confinement, but did not actually torture him. Between Is/^aq b. Isma‘il and Abu Ja‘far Ibn Shir- zad there was close friendship; the latter asked permission of the vizier Ibn Muqlah to interview Is^aq, alleging that he had to examine him on the subject of Second Vizierate of Ibn Muqlah. 279 moneys which in the days of Muqtadir he had been ordered to provide for Ibn Shirzad's chief, Harun b. Gharib, and find out what he had paid, in order that he might not play him some trick with reference to what he had not paid. Ibn Muqlah sent one of the vizier's doorkeepers with him, who brought him to IsAaq. When Is&aq saw who it was, he cried out : Sir, in God's name have pity on me, and go at once to the Mmraffar, the Ustadh, and give him no respite till he releases me from the hands of this madman. Abu Ja‘far went to Mu'nis, and importuned him till he summoned Yalbaq and bade him go and plead with Ibn Muqlah for him ; and if he would not release him—which would be the best thing— at least let him withdraw him from the custody of Mohammed b. Khalaf, and transfer him to that of Mu'nis. Yalbaq carried out his instructions, and Ibn Muqlah saw no escape from complying, and alleviating the sufferings of IsAaq. Abu l-Faraj Ibn Abi Hisham records after Abu Sa‘id Ibn Qudaidah that the cause of the troubles which befell the Baridis was the grievance which Ibn Qarabah had against them for delaying to pay money which they owed him ; he had advanced it on their account and they made difficulties about refunding it. The day whereon Mohammed b. Khalaf got them into his hands by promising to obtain from them 600,000 dinars, Ibn Qarabah obtained a promise from him that he would make them pay back what Ibn Qarabah had advanced on their account, and would refund it to him. When they were put into the power of Mohammed b. Khalaf, he got 20,000 dinars from Abu ‘Abdallah and his two brothers (the Baridis) ; he then sent the receipt of a banker in ‘Aun Street for the sum to Ibn Qarabah, as part payment of the debt due to him. He proceeded to urge his prisoners to further payments ; Abu Yusuf with Abu'l-#usain let him work his will, and endured severe torture at his hands, whereas Abu ‘Abdallah made 280 A.H. 321. Second Caliphate of Qahir. (248) elusive promises, and so secured milder treatment. On the third day of their imprisonment Mohammed b. Khalaf paid a visit to Ibn Muqlah, who said to him : Abu 'Abdallah, you have disappointed us ; those people are in your hands, but their tricks have worked with you and have done you out of your profit.—Mohammed turned red with anger, and said : I have already trans¬ mitted 20,000 dinars from this source, and I only guar¬ anteed payment of the money within three months. What fault has the vizier to find with me, that he can address me so harshly ?—The vizier said : This is the first I have heard about the matter ; to whom did you deliver the money ?—He replied : To Ibn Qarabah.— So the vizier summoned Ibn Qarabah and asked him about the matter mentioned by Mohammed b. Khalaf.— He said : He sent me, sir vizier, this paper, ^which I have not yet cashed at the banker's, stating that it represented part of their debt to me ; had he told me that it was part of the sum to be transmitted I should have reported it at once. Since he has changed his mind, here is the paper, with God's blessing.—He then handed the paper to Mohammed b. Khalaf.—The latter said : No, assuredly I did not set it against your loan ; how could I give your claims priority over those of the Sultan ?—Each of the parties was offended with the other. When Abu 'Abdallah Baridi heard of the meeting, he cheered up, and endeavoured to find the means to write a letter to Ibn Qarabah requesting him to call; he had at the time neither ink nor messenger. It happened however that Abu Sa'id Ibn Qudaidah sent his slave A/hnad to witness his condition, and Abu 'Abdallah threw himself on this slave's mercy, held out hopes of benefits and rewards, and promised to make him a rich man, if he would take a note from him to Ibn Qarabah. The slave yielded, and ingeniously stuffed some inked cotton into a nutshell, which he brought with a small reed and a scrap of paper ; then Abu 'Abdallah Baridi wrote a Second Vizierate of Ibn MuqlAh. 28l letter thereon to Ibn Qarabah wherein he swore that if Ibn Qarabah would take him into his house, he (Baridi) would pay him his money to the last coin, and do him excellent service.—Ibn Qarabah accordingly paid an early visit to Mohammed b. Khalaf, ostensibly to remonstrate ; then, when he had exhausted this subject, he said . Bring Baridi out to me, for he will be at ease with me when I talk to him, that I may settle his fine, and find out what he thinks of doing in the matter of his debt to me.—Mohammed b. Khalaf produced Abu ‘Abdallah Baridi, who afterwards said : (249) The com¬ mencement of my luck was that I said to Mohammed b. Khalaf “ Only private conversation is proof against sorcery/' 1 so will the prince be so good as to leave us two alone ?—Thereupon Mohammed b. Khalaf rose from his seat and foolishly surrendered it to me, saying that he was going to the private apartments. So we had our conference, and I sat on his seat and squatted where he had squatted, and took this as a good omen, thinking to myself that the seat had once been mine, 2 had been transferred to him, and was now restored to me. So I conciliated Abu Bakr Ibn Qarabah, and he promised to rescue me. He was as good as his word, for he went, settled the amount which we must pay, and guaranteed payment of it. The following day Ibn Muqlah declared himself satisfied with us, and summoned my brothers and me. Mohammed b. Khalaf then called us, allayed our apprehensions and sent us to the vizier. As I was about to leave, 3 I said to Mohammed b. Khalaf : Prince, Abu Ya‘qub Isttaq b. Isma'il is your servant, and Mu’nis is protecting him, and is going to send for him immediately ; let me reconcile him to you and arrange between you an oath and a covenant.—He said : Do so.— 1 Eloquence is said to be a form of sorcery. This sentence is apparently a proverb. 2 As farmer of the revenue of Ahwaz. 3 Probably after his release from Mohammed b. Khalafs custody had been finally arranged. 282 A.H. 321. Second Caliphate of Qahir. Being left alone with IsAaq b. Isma'il, I said to him ; I have been having my joke at the expense of- this wretch, and am about to leave ; do you make a covenant with him and swear to it, then say : We are now sworn friends, so I am bound to tell you the truth. Ibn Muqlah detests you, and suspects that you are aiming at the vizierate ; his object has been to raise up enemies for you, and get possession of our goods through you ; he will then urge us to offer a sum of money to be got from you if you are put into our hands. And indeed Abu ‘Abdallah Baridi is prepared to offer 300,000 dinars. He told me so himself. So for some days you should not visit the vizier. If he asks about you, that will show that the Caliph is protecting you from him ; but if he summons you, then his purpose will be to deliver you to Baridi.—Then I went off to Mohammed b. Khalaf, and told him that I had finished the business, and that the man was prepared to serve the prince as he wished.— We departed, and IsAaq repeated to Mohammed b. Khalaf what I had told him, and left the house before the afternoon prayer and after I had gone. When Mohammed b. Khalaf stayed at home, and gave up visiting the vizier, Abu ‘Abdallah Baridi went to Ibn Muqlah and said to him : I learned when I was in Mohammed b. Khalaf s house that he was canvassing for (250) the vizierate, and that his agents were circulat¬ ing among the dependents of Mu’nis and Qahir; you must not let him remain in the town.—Ibn Muqlah was a coward ; so he proceeded to summon Mohammed b. Khalaf, to whom Baridi’s first statement had been already delivered ; so he assaulted the servants, retainers and chamberlain of Ibn Muqlah, 1 beat them, shut them up in a room, and locked the door. He then climbed over the rooves and fled, and did not show himself until Abu Ja'far Mohammed b. Qasim b. ‘Ubaidallah was 1 Who apparently had been seat to fetch him. Second Vizierate of Ibn Muqlah. 283 Qahir s vizier. When Abu‘ Abdallah Baridi was residing m Ahwaz, and Mohammed b. Khalaf after the success of Baridi s plot against himself learned how it was worked, he said to some one who told Baridi, to whom the remark was addressed : I thought well of you, not knowing that you were intriguing against me; yet people had told me the truth about you, only I refused to receive it.—Abu ‘Abdallah Baridi bade Abu ‘Ali the clerk write to the slave Fa’iq bidding him say to Mohammed b. Khalaf: A plot of this kind may well be passed off on you, for such have been passed off on your superiors. But what is more serious is that from the place wherein we were confined there was unknown to you access to your private apartments. Be careful about this in the future. Abu Bakr Ibn Qarabah undertook to mediate in the affairs of the party; he settled them with Ibn Muqlah, who ordered the restoration of the Baridis to their offices,’ wherein they prospered. When Mohammed b. Khalaf’s contract for the revenue which had been farmed by the Baridis was cancelled, he was also dismissed from his ministry of public security in these regions. Ibn Muqlah summoned him, and his assault on the messengers and the chamberlain of the vizier has already been described, as well as his going into hiding. Ibn Muqlah sent again to his house and opened the door of the room where his servants, retainers and chamberlain were imprisoned, and so they were released. Ibn Muqlah was an enemy of Abu’l-Khattab son of Abu’l-‘Abbas son of al-Furat, 1 yet found no official excuse for arresting him, as he had left the service twenty years, during which he had remained in his residence, and contented himself with the proceeds of his land! The reason for Ibn Muqlah’s enmity was that (251) a request for assistance made by himself at the time of his 1 Brother of the vizier. 284 A.H. 321. Second Caliphate of Qahir fall had been declined by Abu’l-Kha#ab, alleging poverty. Presently however Abu’l-Kha^ab held a circumcision feast for his sons on the scale usual with persons of his rank ; to this he invited the children of Ibn Muqlah, who witnessed ample hospitality, with handsome vessels and numerous pieces of plate, some of which had been borrowed. Going home they told their father about it with exaggerations and additions. On the occasion of a state ceremony Abu'l-Kha#ab paid a visit of compli¬ ment to the vizier Ibn Muqlah, according to his custom ; Abu’l-Faraj Ibn Abi Hisham says he was told by Abu Zakariyya Yahya b. Abi Sa'id of Sus that he was present on this occasion when Abu’l-Kha#ab was arrested, and that Ibn Muqlah sent negotiators, of whom he was one, to Abu’l-Kha^ab to demand 300,000 dinars. Abu’l-Kha^ab replied to the demand : What ground has the vizier against me, seeing that I have quitted the service twenty years, and when I was in it, I was honest and harmless, and annoyed no-one ? I have besides certain claims on the vizier which it is not well that he should forget, as he has a reputation for genero¬ sity, whereas it would ill beseem me too to disgrace him by the publication of letters from him in my possession prior to this intemperate display. So say to him: Sir vizier Abu ‘Ali: I would remind you of certain pro¬ ceedings which I might well ask you to bear in mind, and of obligations conferred by me upon you in your dark days in recompense for which I might reasonably ask for the government of a province or a subsidy or excep¬ tional treatment of my land, or some bounty. Is it decent that, when I have released you from all such demands, I should not have even security for my person, owing to your conduct towards me, for which, if you are candid with yourself, you must fear punishment from God and infamy from men ? Your notion about my posses¬ sions is not in accordance with the facts. If this supposed wealth be inherited from my father, I am not Second Vizierate of Ibn Muqlah. 285 his only heir ; had it had an existence, we should have divided it between the number of us, and people would certainly have heard and known about it. But if you suppose me to have acquired it, then my office and its earnings are known, and you are not unaware that they were trifling. Moreover the bureau officials who are still with you will testify that I did not earn the whole of my expenses. If you suppose that it comes (252) from the productiveness of my land, then the produce is divided between the heirs and if you refer to them, you will find that what belonged to me at the time when I held office was only part of what went on my household expenses and entertainment. The viziers and high officials have left sons of the same or less competence than myself, and they have offered themselves for appointments and aspired to posts; they have sent and received messages 1 ; now have you found me do ought but keep the tenor of my way, satisfied with God's shadow being extended over me, and with abstinence from worldly things ? If you injure me, what will you say to God, whose name be blessed, and His servants in excuse ?—When this speech was repeated to Ibn Muqlah—not by us, only he had sent people to listen— he blushed and was confused, and presently said : This man claims the rights of the Furat family, and the Commander of the Faithful does not permit me to re¬ cognize the obligations of people of that kind. I will send him to Khasibi, who will understand better how to treat him.—So we rose and I went to Khasibi, to whom I related what had taken place at the meeting, and then I said : I implore you not to make of yourself an agent of mischief to people, nor let it be said that people lose their fortunes through you, you being a vizier and a vizier's son. God has raised you above such a trade, with your professional skill, your integrity and your descent.—He said : God reward you, you shall see that 1 i.e., to and from the Palace. 286 A.H. 321. Second Caliphate of Qahir. I shall send him back to Ibn Muqlah after I have done a little to him by way of an excuse. Then Ibn Muqlah summoned Khasibi, and delivered Abu’l-Kha^ab to him after compelling him to give a bond for 300,000 dinars to be paid within twenty days. Khasibi called in the prefect of police, who stripped him, and beat him ten strokes with the rod, then had him gently racked, then scourged ; he adhered to his asser¬ tion that he had no money, and that he had put his estates in trust and could not sell them. Then Khasibi desired to be excused further endeavours and sent him back to the residence of Ibn Muqlah, who put him in confinement. He then delivered him to the person known as Ibn al-Ja'fari the Registrar, who brought to him one of the slaves of Qahir and told him that this slave had orders to decapitate him unless he paid an in¬ stalment of the money. He however put them off with elusive promises until the term came, and paid nothing. When the term arrived, he had a sword brought, and bound his head and eyes : (253) Abud-Kha#ab requested that his face might be turned to the qiblah , which was done ; then he said : Gently ! and uttered the shahadah. 1 Ibn al-Ja‘fari hurried to tell Ibn Muqlah who said : Nothing further than this may be done. Mu'nis the Mu^affar then said to Ibn Muqlah : What claim have you on a man who has held no office since the end of 299 ?—So Ibn Muqlah took Abud-Kha^ab and delivered him to his chamberlain with orders to put him in confinement; where he remained two days. Then Abu Yusuf Baridi happening to visit Ibn Muqlah, the latter complained to him of the obstinacy displayed by Abud-Kha^ab, and requested him to mediate. Abu Yusuf went to Abud-Kha^ab and arranged that he should pay ten thousand dinars ; of which however he refused to produce one dirhem even on pain of death before he had been released and sent home. Ibn 1 The two sentences of the Mohammedan faith. Second Vizierate of Ibn Muqlah. 287 Muqlah then sent him one of his own robes of honour, set him on a horse with a saddle, summoned him to his presence and moved towards him almost rising, and then said : The Caliph was urgent in this matter, and I am grieved by what has befallen you. Go home with the escort. He departed and paid the money within ten days, and his lands and goods were released. Ibn Muqlah sent for IsAaq b. Isma'il and obtained his bond to the effect that he would send every lunar month the same amount as he had been in the habit of sending to Muqtadir's private coffer as a secret profit, viz., two thousand dinars ; he also obtained a bond from Abu Abdallah Baridi that he would send three thousand dinars a month on the same system, and those of his brothers Abu Yusuf and Abul-ii/usain for one thousand, five hundred. Story of the fortunes of the commanders in the service of Muqtadir who fled. Harun b. Gharib wrote to Abu Ja'far Mohammed b. Yahya b. Shirzad requesting him to make terms for him, on the basis of a fine of 300,000 dinars to be paid by him, after which his lands (254) and possessions wherever they might be should be freed from embargo, and all other sources of revenue except leases 1 and trusts, which had been in his hands, and he was to pay the dues of the Treasury according to the old assessments. He was also to recover his fiefs. His interests were pro¬ tected by Mu’nis and his dependents. Qahir wrote him an amnesty, the fine which he had offered was accepted, and he was made minister of public security in Mah al- Kufah, Masabadhan, and Mihrijan-qadhaq. 'Abd al-Wahid son of Muqtadir, Mohammed b. Yaqut the Bahilite, 2 the two sons of Ra’iq, Surur and 1 Probably such as belonged to the crown. 2 His father's name indicates that he was originally a slave. 288 A.H. 321. Second Caliphate of Qahir. Muflih, abandoning Harun b. Gharib, left Wasit and proceeded to Sus and Jundaisabur, wasting the land, spoiling and plundering on their way ; they laid hands on the cultivators and traders, and proceeded by land to Suq al-Ahwaz. When they had stayed a longtime in Ahwaz, Yalbaq with the army went out against them. He was met at Jarjaraya by Harun b. Gharib, and then proceeded to the war with the people mentioned. The following is the narrative of Abu’l-Faraj Ibn Abi Hisham, an eye-witness. Muqtadir's commanders who fled with his son 'Abd al-Wa/dd entered Suq al- Ahwaz by the Tib road, but did not enter either Sus or Jundaisabur. Sole command was assumed by Mohammed b. Yaqut over the two sons of Ra'iq and the rest. He made his clerk Qarariti inspector general, levied contri¬ butions, gave orders and counter-orders ; the money poured in to Mohammed b. Yaqut, who gave such sums as he thought fit to the two sons of Ra'iq and the others. He now became unpopular and the others determined to resist him. Now Abu 'Abdallah Baridi was in the confidence of Ibn Muqlah, and was in receipt of correspondence from Ahwaz which told him all that occurred. He advised the vizier to attend to the situation, asserting that the party was breaking up, that Ibn Yaqut was playing the autocrat, but that sentiment was divided ; the two sons of Ra’iq were his (Ibn Muqlah's) friends, and if an army were sent out against them, there would be a split, whereas if they were left to themselves they would be strengthened by the wealth of Ahwaz, would make 'Abd al-WaMd Caliph, and march to the capital. Ibn (255) Muqlah sent Abu ‘Abdallah Baridi to Mu'nis to communicate all this to him orally. Mu'nis said : You see the embarrassment which the provision of the acces¬ sion-money has occasioned, and a quarter's stipend is now due to the troops, since the affair of Muqtadir took Second Vizierate of Ibn Muqlah. 289 place three months ago ; so whence is the money to come ?—Baridi replied : I undertake to supply it; draw upon me for it. I will provide 30,000 dinars in the capital, 50,000 in Sus, 20,000 in Tustar, and the rest in Ahwaz.—The head of the army bureau was summoned, he made out a roll of the force that was enrolled under Yalbaq, and an estimate of the money which they would require. It came to 250,000 dinars. Baridi produced the 30,000 dinars which he had promised to furnish at once in the capital; the commanders were addressed, and the troops mustered with Yalbaq, with whom was Abu 'Abdallah Baridi. Badr Kharshani started by water, and orders were sent to A#mad b. Nasr Qushuri , 1 who was governor of Basrah, to join him. When the armies reached Wasit, Mohammed b. Yaqut became unpopular and this was so clearly shown that he said to the party : I am one of you, and will not oppose your views ; but the best course for us is to gather in Tustar, which is strongly fortified, and there draw up our plans with God's help ; we ought not to fight.—He came to terms with them with regard to the pay which they should receive, and they at once proceeded to 'Askar Mukram, evacuating the capital of Ahwaz. Qararifi however perpetrated enor¬ mities there which went beyond the doings of the Domesticus, as he opened the shops at night, sent mules and carried off the tradesmen's goods, and fined blacks and whites. When news came of the encampment of Yalbaq at Sus, the whole party went to Tustar. Baridi now arrived at Sus and followed the system of Qararid, only he did more ; and by one expedient and another got together the fifty thousand dinars. Then Yalbaq with the army advanced to the Tustar bridge, which they found cut, so that the Dujail separated them from Tustar. 1 See above, p. 205. 290 A.H. 321. Second Caliphate of Qahir. Abu 'Abdallah Baridi is said to have narrated as follows with regard to the sequel: I aspired to be a conqueror and determined to become a ruler of men from the time when I had experience of the weakness of Yalbaq (256) and the incompetence of his secretary Ibn al-Tabari. They were both, I found, unequal to the situation. Deserters were leaving the ranks, Yalbaq was grow¬ ing weary, his troops were out of control, and he was thinking of retreating, but was steadied by Abu'Abdallah Baridi, who went from commander to commander, flattering, bribing, mollifying, and started a correspond¬ ence with the two sons of Ra’iq, assuring them of his affection, and advising them to abandon Mohammed b. Yaqut, on whose bad character, self-conceit, and arbitrary treatment of them he dilated ; ultimately they agreed to accept the government of Basrah and to retire from Tustar.—The first intimation which Mohammed b. Yaqut got of their intention was that one morning they sounded their trumpet and departed. He could do nothing, as, if he had attacked them, the army which was facing him would have taken the opportunity to cross and he would have been killed or taken prisoner. When the two sons of Ra'iq had taken the road to Basrah, MufliA and Surur asked permission to go over to Yalbaq taking with them 'Abd al-Wa/ud : telling Mo¬ hammed b. Yaqut that they were discouraged, and that whereas he was protected by his troops, they and their followers had no protectors save their retainers.—He left the choice to them ; and they entered into communi¬ cation with Yalbaq, from whom they obtained the pro¬ mise of their lives; they then crossed over to him. This embarrassed Mohammed b. Yaqut, who sent to Yalbaq requesting him to swear to deal honourably with him if an interview were arranged, he Mohammed b. Yaqut to cross over to Yalbaq, discuss matters with him, and then Second Vizierate of Ibn Muqlah. 291 return to his camp. Yalbaq agreed and swore as desired ; Mohammed b. Yaqut then crossed over to him in a white vest, a turban, and shoes, 1 accompanied by a single slave, in the afternoon. Yalbaq rose to meet him, and they held a long discussion the upshot of which was not at once known. Baridi was in a fever of excitement, and went again and again to Ibn al-Tabari, suggesting that Mohammed b. Yaqut should be arrested. Ibn al-Tabari communicated his advice to Yalbaq, adding that this was the suggestion of Baridi, the representative of the vizier, and the counsellor of the Ustadh Mu'nis ; he himself said nothing. Yalbaq’s reply was : I am not the man to repudiate my guarantee or violate my oath, even at the cost of my life.—When prayer-time came, Mohammed b. Yaqut stood up in a wide space beneath the canopy and pronounced the call to prayer, and then the formula called iqamah 2 ; Yalbaq then came forward to prayer with most of the troops behind him. When Mohammed b. Yaqut had finished the prescribed prayer, he bent over Yalbaq to embrace him, the latter rose, they bade (257) each other farewell, and Mohammed b. Yaqut returned to his army. The secret was now revealed. After some mutual remonstrances they had come to an agreement, which they swore to observe, according to which both parties were to proceed to the capital, each with a safe-conduct from the other, but with a distance of a day's journey between them on the march. After three days Mohammed b. Yaqut advanced from Tustar to 'Askar Mukram, and Yalbaq entered Tustar. Here Baridi did worse than had been done by Qararid by a great deal, for the people had taken precautions against Qararid, but felt safe when they saw the followers of the vSultan. Baridi came upon them, and assailed the Jews who were the bulk of the traders ; by outdoing 1 This means in the dress of a civil official. 2 A second call to prayer; in the Shafi'i system the first is of nine sentences, the second of eleven, 292 A.H. 321. Second Caliphate of Qahir. every known form of outrage he made up the hundred thousand dinars. 1 Meanwhile Yalbaq advanced to Ahwaz, whose inhabitants were flying from Mohammed b. Yaqut, and escaped, as they went to Basrah. Baridi afflicted the people of ‘Askar Mukram and Tustar, his mildest measure being to ride to the bankers' houses and appropriate all the money that he found whether theirs or their clients' ; he ravaged the Sawad till he paid Yalbaq 200,000 dinars, and he still owed 50,000. He was protected by Ibn al-Tabari, on whom he had humbly ministered, so much so that he would come with him to the doors of the local churches, and sit on a horsecloth waiting till he came out, when he would ask him for his consecrated bread, 2 which when given him, he would kiss before putting it into his sleeve; he had also formally presented him with lands producing a revenue of ten thousand dinars. Hence Ibn al-Tabari befriended him. So he approached Yalbaq on his behalf, saying : Let us set this fifty thousand to the account of the prince, 3 whose gratuity was included in the sum promised by Baridi, for he has done good service and whitened the prince's face by his operations and devices, which have dispersed the enemies. He deserves Ibn Muqlah's place better than Ibn Muqlah and is a far abler manager of affairs. Yalbaq agreed to this proposal, and left with Baridi a slave named Itakh. (258) Mohammed b. Yaqut marched to Shabarzan, and was followed by Yalbaq ; they entered Baghdad. The embargo was removed from the possessions of the two sons of Ra'iq, Mohammed b. Yaqut, MufliA and Surur, with the exception of their fiefs ; to ‘Abd al- WaAid some of his original possessions were restored, and he and his mother were excused their fines. Baridi was 1 See above, p. 255. 2 For the practice of giving this to Moslems see the index to my edition of Sib/ Ibn al-Ta‘awidhi. See further Bliss, Religions of Syria p. 132 and foil. 3 i.e., Yalbaq. Second Vizierate of Ibn Muqlah. 293 again made finance minister of Ahwaz, and order was restored. Qahir bestowed on Yalbaq a robe of honour, a couple of collars and a couple of bracelets, studded with gems. An order was issued by Qahir for the sale of the Muk- harrim palace which was the official residence of the vizier, having originally belonged to Sulaiman b. Wahb. 1 It was divided into lots and sold to a number of persons for a vast sum, as its area occupied 300,000 square cubits. The price was spent on the gratuities given on the occa¬ sion of Qahir's accession. News came of the death of Takin the Favourite in Egypt, and Ibn Muqlah advised that 'Ali b. Tsa be sent to inspect the province ; he began to make preparations for the journey, then one evening he went to Ibn Muqlah and finding him disengaged, pointed out to him his advanced age, his difficulty in moving and his failing strength, declared that he appealed to nothing but the vizier s own generosity, and employed no other inter¬ cessor, assured him with solemn oaths of his fidelity, and begged to be excused the journey ; he so far humiliated himself as to bend down for the purpose of kissing the viziers hand.—This the vizier would not permit him to do ; in his reply he showed that he recognized 'Ali b. 'Isa's claims, and respected his rank ; and he excused him from taking the journey. ‘Ali b. Tsa returned home after expressing his gratitude. A letter arrived from Takin's son Mohammed soliciting his father's place; his application was granted, and the robes of honour with the deed of investiture were sent out. Qahir proceeded to write an autograph to Ibn Muqlah, wherein he called him by his kunyah, assigned him fresh honours and distinctions, and ordered that this should be circulated to all the cities and provinces. This was done*; then he sent him robe after robe of honour as the 1 Vizier of Mu'tamid, appointed 263. 294 A.H. 321. Second Caliphate of Qahir. Caliph's messmate ; and had conveyed to him a silver- gilt dish (259) containing nadd y ambergris and musk, and another containing a crystal vessel holding a rati of old raisin syrup with a crystal glass and decanter and a silver bason.- The army in Egypt mutinied against Mohammed b. Takin, and defeated him in battle. In this year Mu'nis the Mmaffar, Yalbaq, his son 'Ali, and Ibn Muqlah became disaffected towards Qahir and endeavoured to coerce him and his dependents. Account of the reason for this. The reason for this was the dislike of the vizier Ibn Muqlah to Mohammed b. Yaqut. He put into the minds of Mu'nis the Mu^affar, Yalbaq, and his son 'Ali that Mohammed b. Yaqut was plotting against them with Qahir, and that 'Isa the physician acted as messenger between Qahir and him. Mu'nis in consequence sent 'Ali son of Yalbaq to the Palace, where he asked for 'Isa and was told that he was in Qahir's presence ; the retainers of 'Ali b. Yalbaq thereupon rushed in, and finding 'Isa on his feet in the presence of Qahir, arrested him, and took him off to Mu'nis, who straightway banished him to Mausil. Mu'nis, Yalbaq, his son, and the vizier Ibn Muqlah then decided to assault Mohammed b. Yaqut, and to issue a proclamation that his followers were not to remain in Baghdad. On Wednesday 1 Jumada ii (May 29, 933) 'Ali b. Yalbaq started with the army, accompanied by Tarif Subkari, for the purpose of assaulting Mohammed b. Yaqut. The latter, hearing of this design, absconded from his camp at the Ashnan parade-ground, and the efforts of ‘Ali b. Yalbaq to discover his whereabouts were unavailing ; for he had gone into Baghdad and concealed himself there ; and his followers had dispersed. 'Ali b. Yalbaq returned at once to the Palace, placed Second VizieratR of Ibn Muqlah. 295 Qahir under restraint, put Ahmad b. Zairak in charge of the Palace, and ordered him to search every one who went in or came out, man, woman or eunuch, and to search all who went to the Caliph. Ahmad b. Zairak carried out his orders so faithfully that he even examined some milk that was being carried to Qahir, dipping his finger in to see that it (260) contained no letter. ‘Ali b. Yalbaq proceeded to transfer to his own residence the personages who were imprisoned in the Palace, such as the mother of Muqtadir and others ; Qahir was not allowed the money to pay his attendants nor most of what was furnished to him ; and ‘Ali b. Yalbaq de¬ manded that the Caliph should surrencer to him what remained in his possession of the fabrics and furniture which had belonged to Muqtadir's mother and her nephew Harun. These things were surrendered and sold ; the price was then paid in to the Treasury and thence distributed to the troops ; Ibn Muqlah also sold, in order to make up the accession-money, lands and property belonging to the Sultan of which the price amounted to 2,400,000 dinars, including what was realized by the sales effected by Kalwadhani when deputy, prior to the arrival of Ibn Muqlah from Shiraz. The mother of Muqtadir remained with the mother of ‘Ali b. Yalbaq in honour and comfort for ten days, and died on 6 Jumada ii 1 (June 3, 933) owing to the in¬ creasing severity of her illness, and the tortures which Qahir had made her suffer. She was carried to her tomb in Rusafah and buried there. In this year ‘Ali b. Yalbaq and his secretary ifASAN b. Harun proposed to institute the cursing of Mu‘awiyah Ibn Abi Sufyan from the pulpits 2 ; the public were agitated by this, and ‘Ali b. Yalbaq ordered the arrest of 1 If this date is right, she must have been transferred from the Palace before the date given above. a This measure was doubtless suggested by the growing power of the Spanish Umayyad 'Abd al-RaAman ii. It had been contemplated by Mu'tadid. 296 A.H. 321. Second Caliphate of Qahir. Barbahari, 1 head of the #anbalites, and a number of his chief (261) followers ; they were placed in a closed boat and sent down the river to Basrah. And in this year Qahir plotted successfully against Mu’nis the Mazaffar, the plan of Ibn Muqlah to arrest Qahir was frustrated, and instead Mu’nis, Yalbaq, and his son were arrested, while Ibn Muqlah and flasan b. Harun took to flight. Account of the frustration of the plot . When ‘Ali b. Yalbaq put pressure on Qahir and the latter endured the treatment which has been described, the Caliph began to scheme against Mu'nis and his party. Learning that Jarif Subkari and Bushra were ill- disposed to Yalbaq and his son, as they envied their exalted positions, and knowing that Mu'nis and Yalbaq placed their chief reliance on the Saji troops, whom they had promised, if they entered Baghdad, to put on a level with the ii/ujaris, and that this promise had not been fulfilled, in consequence of which these troops were dis¬ affected towards the two : Qahir entered into communi¬ cation with the Sajis and stirred them up against Mu'nis and Yalbaq, guaranteeing that he would transfer them to the scale of the i/ujaris, who received their pay once in fifty days, whereas the Sajis received once in sixty according to the scale of the slaves, and make them equal to the #ujaris in rations and provender. Now there was an old friendship between the Stewardess Ikhtiyar and Abu Ja'far Mohammed b. Qasim b. ‘Ubaidallah, 2 3 and she was in frequent com¬ munication with his mother ; this Stewardess advised Qahir to write to him promising him the vizierate, on consideration of his helping the Caliph in his plot against 1 The name is said to mean “ dealer in Indian drugs ” in the dialect of Basrah. This person’s full name was Abu Mohammed Hasan b. 'Ali b. Khalaf. He died 326. 3 See above, p. 212. His father had been vizier. Second Vizierate of Ibn Muqlah. 297 Mu nis and his party. She further suggested to t his Mohammed b. Qasim to write to Qahir giving him a true account of the designs of Ibn Muqlah and Yalbaq’s son against him. Now this Ikhtiyar was in the habit of going from the Palace to Qahir’s former quarters in the house of Ibn Tahir, ostensibly on the business of Qahir’s women and children ; and when it was night she went to Mohammed b. Qasim and interviewed him. Ibn Muqlah learned that Qahir was strenuously scheming against himself, Mu nis, Yalbaq, his son, and Hasan b. Harun, and in consequence urged them (262) to take action quickly and depose Qahir, whose successor they agreed should be Abu Ahmad son of Muktafi. To Shahmaruz, mother-in-law of Ibrahim b. Khafif, head of the bureau of outgoings, who was on intimate terms with Abu A/zmad, they communicated their plan ; they privately conferred the sovereignty on this prince, and allegiance to him was sworn by Yalbaq, his son, Ibn Muqlah, and Hasan b. Harun. After this they’ told Mu’nis what they had done. He said to them : I have no doubt about the iniquities of Qahir, though you have treated him with too much contempt; you made a mistake in appointing him Caliph. Do not hurry now, but be gentle with him, so that you may quiet his appre¬ hensions ; then, when he feels secure and his mind is at ease, arrest him.—-‘Ali b. Yalbaq and Hasan b. Harun replied that they were the official doorkeepers, and the Palace was in their hands ; the Caliph was like a bird in a cage, so they required the assistance of no-one in arresting him. Hence they were for hurrying the matter on. It happened that Yalbaq, riding to the parade- ground, came into collision with one of his servants, and was thrown ; he fell ill and was confined to his house. His son 'Ali got the opportunity of backing Ibn Muqlah, and they proceeded to advocate their plan with Mu’nis and Yalbaq, minimizing the difficulties, until they 298 A.H. 321. Second Caliphate of Qahir. obtained the consent of the two. On Saturday ult. Rajab (July 27, 933 Y when Ibn Muqlah came away from the Sultan’s apartments, he was joined by his clerks, his brother, and other persons who usually ate at his table, among whom was Abu Bakr Ibn Qarabah. When he had finished his meal, he turned to Ibn Qarabah and said to him : Your Qarmadan friend has got to Kufah with three thousand mounts, accompanied by his adherent (mentioning some name), has entered the town, and proclaimed a general amnesty to the inhabitants except the adherents of “ the person called Mohammed and entitled Qahir.’’—Ibn Qarabah said : Vizier, this is a fiction ; Ibn Busr of Kufah is my neighbour, and was with me to-day ; pigeons have just arrived assuring him that all there is well.—Ibn Muqlah retorted : Good Lord ! Do you suppose that you and Ibn Busr know better than the minister of public security at Kufah, from whom ‘Ali b. Yalbaq has just received a pigeon ? Moreover I have just been visited by Sa‘id b. #amdan, with a Bedouin, who all but killed (263) himself, and ruined a number of horses, who brings the news of what he himself witnessed. (Ibn Muqlah had previously arranged with Sa‘id b. #amdan that he should confirm this.) Ibn Muqlah then called for an inkstand and a “ third ” of paper, 2 and proceeded to write an autograph letter to Qahir, wherein he stated that the Qarmaiian from Hajar, called Abu Tahir, had come to Kufah with three thousand mounts, and entered the place ; pigeons (he said) have reached me from the finance minister, and ‘Ali b. Yalbaq from the minister of public security, with letters bearing the date of to-day, announcing his arrival with his followers. Yalbaq and I have concealed this intelligence from the commanders and the army, and from the court, for fear it should get about, and 1 The first day of the next month according to Wiistenfeld. * i.e., of a sheet of standard size. Different accounts of this phrase are given by Qalqashandi. Second Vizierate of Ibn Muqlah. 299 discourage our friends. Mu'nis and I have arranged to despatch Ali b. Yalbaq with most of his captains and those of his father to the environs of Kufah, to prevent the Qarmaiian from advancing thence to Baghdad ; he is to start to-morrow morning, moving to Sarsar so as not to pitch a tent near the Gate of Baghdad. There he will be joined by the troops. The sergeants have been sent 1 this evening, and I have instructed ‘Ali b. Yalbaq to present himself to-night at the Palace, to take leave of your majesty. I have arranged to come late, lest the news should be disseminated that I presented myself at the imperial apartment at an unusual hour, and so the plan whereby ‘Ali b. Yalbaq is to start to-morrow morning be spoiled. I am communicating this to your majesty that you may be aware of it, acquiesce in my plans, and grant ‘Ali b. Yalbaq his audience when he presents himself this evening.—After sending this letter the vizier went to sleep.—Qahir sent a written reply to the effect that he approved the vizier's action, and would receive ‘Ali b. Yalbaq when he presented himself.— When Ibn Muqlah woke, without waiting to receive Qahir s reply to his note, he sent a second note to the same effect. When this reached Qahir, since there was no occasion for this note, as the reply to the first had been sent off, his suspicion was aroused, and he scented a plot against himself. Then he learned through Tarif Subkari (by some treachery) of ‘Ali b. Yalbaq's design to arrest him when he had been admitted to an audience, and so took precautions ; he sent for (264) the Sajis, and informed them that ‘Ali b. Yalbaq was about to present himself for the purpose of executing a plot. They remained within call in groups. After the afternoon prayer ‘Ali b. Yalbaq presented himself, somewhat the worse for liquor, with a small number of his retainers armed, in his barge, having sent another band of retainers 2 to the Palace. Mounting from his barge to 1 To collect the troops. Probably by land. 300 A.H. 321. Second Caliphate of Qahir. the porch, he sent a messenger to Qahir requesting admis¬ sion ; Qahir put him off until all the Sajis were present in. arms. These troops then went out to 'Ali b. Yalbaq, insulted him and tried to arrest him. He was defended by his retainers and his door-keeper Ibn Khandaquqi, who put themselves between him and the Sajis ; calling out to them, he flung himself from the porch into his barge, crossed the river and concealed himself forthwith. Ibn Muqlah, hearing of this, also went immediately into hiding, and the same step was taken by ffasan b. Harun and Ibn Qarabah. Yalbaq, accompanied by all the captains who were in the palace of Mu’nis at the time, went down to the Caliph's Palace, thinking that he would be able to cajole Qahir and make some excuse for his son. As soon as he had reached the Palace he was arrested and imprisoned. Ahmad b. Zairak, and the prefect of Police, Yumn the One-eyed, were arrested also; and the whole army was quartered inside the Palace. Qahir then sent a message to Mu'nis, requesting him to come down to him, as he desired to consult him con¬ cerning the course which he should follow, adding : I regard you as a parent, and would fain do nothing and execute no plan except in accordance with your views.— Mu’nis excused himself on the ground of the difficulty that he had in moving, but Qahir insisted, and asked him to make the effort.—Tarif Subkari declared that it would be improper for him to hang back, and urged him to go to the Palace.—When he arrived there, he was arrested and imprisoned. Ibn Muqlah had been Qahir's vizier nine months and three days; Qahir now sent for Abu Ja'far Mohammed b. Qasim b. ‘Ubaidallah on Sunday (265) 1 Sha'ban (July 28, 933), gave him an audience, and appointed him vizier and chief of the* bureaux. On the following Monday he bestowed on him the robes of office. The same day Qahir sent to summon Tsa the physician from Mausil. The house of Ibn Muqlah at the Bustan VlZIERATE OF MOHAMMED B. QaSIM. 301 Shf T S f/T 3, and burned down - and Baghdad was P aged. Mohammed b. Yaqut came out of conceal¬ ment, appeared at the Palace, and for that day l C 7 d fl t e functions of Chamberlain ; but finding mmself m disfavour with 7’arif Subkari, the Sajis and the • a]a " S ’ he devi , sed a scheme whereby he fled and went nto hiding, and descended the river with the view of joining is father in Fars. He did not however get • e ^ nd Arra J an < and did not meet his father. He sat in the boat 1 m the attire of a penman, 2 sailed the sea, nded at Mahruban and reached Arrajan at night w ere he became the guest of Abu’l-‘Abbas b. Dinar’ S fat , he i r sent him money, clothes and horses, and he proceeded to call m moneys that had been assigned him }".fars- H e was joined here by his troops, and received a etter from Qahir allaying his apprehensions and t ellin g im that he acted with undue haste in taking alarm He was appointed minister of public security in the dis- tncts of Ahwaz, remained at Arrajan until he fell ill ns place being bad for his constitution, when he moved to Kamhurmuz. Qahir had previously written to Mar- dawij, bidding him evacuate Ispahan, to be invested with the government of Rayy and the jabal, and so be¬ come an authorized ruler and cease to be a rebel; and this had been accomplished. 3 He also wrote to Wash- magir, bidding him retire from Ispahan, which he did ; the province was left without a ruler for seventeen days’ when Qahir wrote to Mohammed b. Yaqut, appointing him governor of Ispahan, and bidding him go thither; this was after the defeat of his brother Muzaffar b. Yaqut and the retirement of ‘Ali b. Buwaihi from Ispahan. 4 Mohammed b. Yaqut made preparations and was en S a g e< i on them when he received news of Qahir’s deposition, and his plans were thrown out. 1 The text has " in the water." 2 Another account has " of a Sufi, Above, p. 229, this had been done in Muqtadir’s time. 4 The account of these events comes later. 302 A.H. 321. Second Caliphate of Qahir. When 'Ali b. Yalbaq had gone into hiding and Mo¬ hammed b. Yaqut fled, Qahir made (266) Salamah Tuluni Chamberlain. He proceeded to search for the persons who had gone into hiding. He appointed Abu l- 'Abbas Ahmad b. Khaqan prefect of police, who made a search for Abu AAmad son of Muktafi, and discovered him in the house of ‘Abdallah b. al-Fat h. Qahir gave orders that the prince should be placed in a doorway and then built in with cement and brick, he being alive, 1 These orders were carried out. He ordered the houses of the Banu Muqlah to be pillaged,/ as also those of tfasan b. Harun and Ibn Qarabah. ‘Ali b. Yalbaq was found in concealment near the gate of the Cemetery ; he was surprised and taken from a bakehouse, which he had entered when he perceived that he had been sur¬ prised, closing the lid upon himself. He had escaped detection, and those who were on the search for him, not finding him, had gone out of the place ; only it hap¬ pened that one of the infantry went back in search of something to take out of the house, and coming to the oven, searched it for dry bread ; when he opened it, he found ‘Ali b. Yalbaq there ; at his shouts his comrades came back, and captured him ; and he was brought to the Caliph's Palace. He was violently beaten in the pre¬ sence of Qahir, and confessed to the possession of ten thousand dinars, which were found and paid into the Treasury. A fresh beating elicited no further money, so he was imprisoned. tfusAiN b. Qasim b. ‘Ubaidallah 8 was in hiding ; a message was sent him by his brother the vizier Mo¬ hammed, asking him to show himself, and assist him, and he would make him president of the bureaux of the Sawad, of the army and of outgoings. He would 1 Other accounts represent him as being put to death by some other bar¬ barous method. 3 He had been Muqtadir’s vizier in 319, and was exiled to Basrah with a pension. Vizierate of Mohammed b. Qasim. 303 appoint as his deputies Kalwadhi, 1 Ibrahim b. Khafif and Uthman b. Sa'id. He swore, in the presence of the intermediary, by God Almighty, and by all the oaths ot allegiance, involving in the event of perjury manu¬ mission of his slaves and divorce of his wives, that he was well-disposed to his brother, (267) and that his inner feelings agreed with their outer expression in these offers. He in addition wrote an autograph letter to the same effect, wherein he invoked the witness of God to what he felt. The intermediary took this document and brought it to ifusain, to whom he narrated the pro¬ ceedings. Mohammed (the vizier) -|kept waiting for his brother till the end of the day. Qasim, son of his brother /zusam, narrated how the vizier came at night to //usain without an attendant, talked to him about showing himself, asked for his personal assistance, and repeated the oaths which he had sworn. Finally JTusain pro¬ mised the vizier that he would come to him next evening. He informed his friends, who rode with him to his brother s. His brother the vizier had prepared for him a covered boat, and when iJusain arrived, the vizier ordered that he should be got into the boat. His mother, learning of this, came and stood on the bank of the Tigris at the place where he would go down to his barge , there was a concourse of people there, and she called on the vizier for help, loosed her hair in his pres¬ ence and showed her breast, and abjured him by every claim she had upon him to release her son. He paid her not the slightest attention, sat down in his barge, and proceeded to the Palace. There was not one of those present but disapproved his action, and cursed him. He went on and told Qahir that he had hunted down his brother Husain and banished him to Raqqah owing to his acceptance of the doctrine of Ibn Abi’l-'Azaqir, 2 whence he regarded him as a danger to the dynasty. 1 More often called Kalwadhani. 2 See above, p. 123 and Appendix, 304 A.H. 321. Second Caliphate of Qahir. Qahir had the houses of the Banu Bisfam put under surveillance owing to the report that they held the doc¬ trine of Ibn Abi’l-'Azaqir. Account of the execution of Mu’nis, Yalbaq , and his son ‘ Ali . The troops of Mu’nis and Yalbaq raised a disturbance and mutinied, and were followed by the rest of the army ; they went out to the country, and then made for the palace of the vizier Abu Ja'far Mohammed b. Qasim, of which they burned down the porch, calling out the name of Mu’nis—a proceeding which was the cause of his being put to death. Qahir went to the place wherein Mu’nis, Yalbaq and his son were confined ; the throat of 'Ali was cut in Qahir’s presence, and his head was sent to his father, who wept with despair at the sight; (268) then Yalbaq’s throat was cut and his head with that of his son sent to Mu’nis, who when he saw them cursed their slayer. He was dragged by the foot to the gutter, and there slaughtered like a sheep, while Qahir looked on. The three heads were brought out in three basons to the parade-ground, to be seen by the people ; that of Yalbaq’s son 'Ali was carried round the city on both sides, then brought back to the Palace and in accordance with custom placed in the magazine of skulls. Thabit states on the authority of Salamah Tuluni the Chamberlain that when the head of Mu’nis was brought to him to dress, he removed the brain and weighed it ; the weight came to six ratls. 1 I heard the same from Juhani, who was present. Among the incidents that took place on this occasion were the following. A party of cavalry and infantry caught Abu Bakr Ibn Nubatah al-Daqqaq, the Witness, in Perfume Street, and pretending that the 1 For the brain-weights of famous men see A. Wilson, Education, Personality and Crime, 1908, p. 73. Vizierate of Mohammed b. Qasim. 305 Sultan had sent them to search for Hasan b Harun ovS he heaTo'r *2? 30 000 dina,s - H ^ K H ° * he P“ r ty and declared that he was Hasan b. Harun. Affinad b. Khaqan (chief of police) mfde him” 5111 / ° f ^ Pe ° ple ’ caught one of the “ an d ade him confess; he gave the names of several of whom He^xTcuted^tlm ' m ° ney WaS recovered ' He executed those of the robbers whom he caught. forh^- In thiS year there Was issued an order of Qahirto forbid singing-women, wine and other liquors ; Ml men own as singers, or hermaphrodites, and all sin