^r^rm 
 
 r%..x.V.'ir- 
 
 ■^ . -^^^ 
 
 jr?sr 
 
 ^: 
 
 t ^V -»• • &i*"C! 
 
 
T, 1 B K A H Y 
 pki.\ci:t<»\, i\. J. 
 
 PONATIOX OF 
 
 S A M f hi 1. A a N K W , 
 
 . )■ l- H I 1. 1 li E L P H 1 \ . PA 
 
 L-'fter 
 
 ^/-i. 
 
 /^ /^UOAf J^'^J^^^'^ f 
 
 No. 
 
 COLLECTION OF PURITAN AND 
 ENGLISH THEOLOGICAL LITERATURE 
 
 ? 
 
 LIBRARY OF THE THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY 
 PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY 
 
 c 
 
 ?/5^ 
 
REFLECTIONS 
 
 To a Late 
 
 BOO K, 
 
 Entituled, 
 
 The GENVINE REM J INS 
 
 O F 
 
 Dr.Tho. Barlow, 
 
 Late BISHOP of 
 
 L I N C O L N. 
 
 Fallly pretended to be PubliQied from 
 His LORDSHIP'S Original Papers. 
 
 With a CATALOGUE ofSociNiAN Writers. 
 
 4 
 
 Hac 'volebam, nefcius nt effes. Preface to tlie Rcma'ws. I 
 
 LONDON, 
 
 Printed for Robert CUvell, at the Peacock in St. Vml\ 
 Church-Yard. MDCXCIV. 
 
Imprimatur. 
 
 Guil. Lancafter, R. P. D. 
 
 Hen^ Epifco. Lond' a Sacris 
 Domeft- 
 
 July aj. 
 1694. 
 
T O T H E 
 
 Reverend Doctor FV LLER^ 
 
 CHANCELLOR 
 
 O F T H E 
 
 CATHEDRAL CHURCH in LINCOLN. 
 
 s I R, 
 
 AS Ijhall conftantly endeavour to approve my 
 fe/ffevfible of viy late Lord Bijkop of Lin- 
 coln s great Favours in general, fo in particular I 
 thinly my felf happy in your Friendjhip, which I 
 have not a little Experienced ever fince my firjl 
 admiffion into the Church of Lincoln, by vertue 
 cj his Lord Bifhops Patronage, 
 
 When I was with you at Lincoln in May lajly 
 you were pleafed to enquire about the late Bifhop 
 cf Lincoln s Original MSS^ which were e?itrufted 
 •with my Brother Chaplain and my felf., and to 
 exprefs your Concern very much^thatfuch poor Scraps of 
 Learning fhould be Printed under the Authority of 
 fo great a Name as Voifor Barlow's was 5 and thai 
 the Genuine Remains which were Extant, did not 
 only injure the Menmy of him that was a Learned 
 
 A 2 father 
 
The Epiftle Dedicatory. 
 
 Father of our Churchy but occafion^ fome Perfons 
 to cenfure and condemn thofe vpimn be bad left bis 
 Legatees for his Papers : I did then ajfure you, that 
 we that had the Bifhofs MSS bad taken all 'una- 
 ginahle Care 'of them, having never parte J with 
 any of the7Ji, nor gave confent that any fart or par- 
 eel of them JhoulJ be Printed-^ and that what had 
 happen d was altogether without our knowledge. 
 And thus much I gave you for truth under my own 
 HaTtd^in a Paper which I left with you -^^ the Si^bjiance 
 of which I read to the Reverend Do^or Gardiner, 
 our prefent Sub-Dean^ who was equally concern d 
 with your felf that any thing fhould pafs abroad 
 under our late Bifhops Name and Characfer, which 
 might in the leafi prejudice the Church and his Me- 
 mory. I then fatisfied you both, that one Sir P. P. and 
 the late Vicar of Bugden, were the confederate Ped- 
 lars^ that have endeavour d to impofe upon the 
 World fo much varniJUdWare, for the fake of Twen- 
 ty Guineas gave for the Copy 3 as bis Wife in- 
 formed a Reverend Friend of mine. 
 
 Soon after I left Lincoln, / met with the late 
 Minijler of Bugden^ who confefsd he did commu- 
 nicate the DireBions to a young Divine, which ufh- 
 ers in the reft of the Remains to Sir P. P. which 
 MSS I told him was not compleated :, for being ad- 
 mitted, fometime to a freedom of Difcourfe with his 
 \ ■ "^ Lordfhip, 
 
The Epiftle Dedicatory. 
 Lorc/Jhipy upon viy mentionivg once the Vrintijig of 
 his 'Av]o<rxi'^'icriJ.ct\ he rras pleas J to fay, TIjat he 
 feard his Dire^ions were imperfe^ 5 for havi?ig 
 vrritte?i them at fever al times, they require! a care- 
 ful Review, and more Time than he had then to 
 fpare for fuch a purpofe 5 but faid he hopd to he 
 more at leifure to confult hereafter, what was pro- 
 per to be done : My Lord in a few Months after 
 died, without pemfing his own Original M5S. or 
 Corre^ing of any Copy, that had been taken after 
 it: And many of tbofe Copies which were wrote 
 from the Original were imperfeSi 5 my Lord com- 
 manding oftentimes that only fome part of his Di- 
 regions jlctdd be copied out, which, faid he, may be 
 fufficient for fome who are very cJirious in Books, or 
 perhaps not able to br/y many. 
 
 At my return hither I delay d no time to acquaint 
 Mr, Brougham with the ill Confequences which I 
 apprehended might enfue, upon our fufferi?2g fo 
 much Injujiice to be done to our late Lord's Me- 
 vmy, without any Advert ifement^ or Notice taken 
 of it by us, who were jointly concern d in our own 
 Vindication^ as well as our Lord's : I defird him 
 {fince he had all the Bifhops MSS, in his cujiody 
 tf/ Queens College Oxon.) to confult them that were 
 ufejulfor our prefent purpofe, in expofing the DefeHs of 
 the Genuine Remains 3 he readily anfwerd my Re- 
 
 -Ck J.1 
 
 VJ.>1 
 
The Epiftle Dedicatory. 
 queft^ and return d me the fdllovpi7ig Letter which I 
 fendyou':, and being confident you willheflecdd with 
 the defign of doing Juftice to the Memory of a Learn- 
 ed Prelate^ which has fuferd in the Publication of 
 little things^ whilji the more weighty Effe^s of his 
 indefatigable Pains and Study have ( according to 
 his own Inclinations and Will) been kepfrom being 
 viade Publick: 
 
 I am Sir, 
 
 Middlcton-Stony, 
 y««,i3. 94. 
 
 Your moil Obliged Servant, 
 
 Wmam Offiey. 
 
 REFLE: 
 
(7) 
 
 EFLECTIONS 
 
 On a Late 
 
 BOO 
 
 SIR, 
 
 YO U may remember, that difcourfing with you 
 frequently about fbme Pieces that Iiave appeared 
 under the late Learned and Pious Bilhop of 
 Lincoln's Name, particularly that of the Genu^ 
 ine Remains, I always exprefs't my Scnfe about them 
 to this effect ; That though there was foul play praftifed 
 in the publifhing of them, and fuch as dcferved to be 
 taken notice of, yet that thofe concern'd therein had laid 
 their defign ( of getting a penny ) fb open, and their 
 poor Arts of raifing the price and bulk of a Book fb obvi- 
 ous and undifguifed, that they were vifible to every 
 Eye without being pointed to, and fb needed not be 
 more effe£lually expofed than they had done it them- 
 felves. 
 
 And for the clearing us, whom the Bifliop was plea- 
 fed to appoint Legatees for all his own Original Manu- 
 Icripts, I thought it fufficient for us openly to dilavow 
 ( as for my part, I did upon all occafions ) our being 
 either contenting or fb much as privy to the Printing 
 any of them ; which if we had been minded to do, it 
 
 had 
 
( 8 ) . 
 
 had been eafy to have made choice of fuch,. as were 
 mfinitely more worthy of the Bi(liop''s Character. And 
 to remove all Sufpicion at the greater diltance, I failM 
 not to acquaint others (as opportunity icrved ) that 
 the Bifhop, at the difpofal of his MSS.. iliew\i no 
 inchnation to have any of them pubhfli'd after his 
 Deceafe; for that the freedom being taken to ask his 
 Lordfhip whether he would have any of them Printed, 
 his Anfwer was, ( as near as I could recolleti ) that he 
 did not defire that any fhould. Now though this did not 
 amount to an abfolute Prohibition, yet I told them we 
 took it to be a Signification of the Bifhop's Mind, and 
 accordingly thought our Selves bound religioully to 
 obferve it, notwithftanding the expedlations and impor- 
 tunities of others, or the Advantage we might ocherwile 
 propofe to our felves- 
 
 And thus being in no wife confcious to our lelves, 
 of fending any thing abroad under the Biihop's Name; 
 I hope it may feem. the more excufable that we have 
 been the lefs concern'd to publifli our Innocence. 
 
 The only thing then that could be expeded from 
 us, was^ thas fomething fliould be offerM in Vindi- 
 cation of the Bifliop's Memory, to which upon feveral 
 accounts we owe a great Efteem and Veneration ^ 
 and which indeed would be extremely injured, if the 
 World fhould believe ( what is fuggefted in the Pomp- 
 ous Title ) that Thofe were THE Genuifte ProduAs 
 of the Learned Prelate's long Study and Labour. But, 
 the truth is, I could never perfwade my felf that any, 
 that were acquainted with his Lordfhip's great Abilities 
 ( as few were ignorant of them ) could ever entertain 
 lb injurious a thought of him. It was very well known 
 that as He had made a noble Colledion of Books, fb he 
 put them to better ufe than any thing that's Printed 
 
 fiuce 
 
C 9 ) 
 
 finc€ his Death doth fliew ; and has taken the mofl 
 efFedlual way to make them ferviccable hei-eafter, by 
 bequeathing them to Bodlefs and QuQcns-C ol/^ge Li- 
 braries in Oxford, and thereby accomphfhing his own 
 often repeated promifes, and tiie hopes that others had 
 conceivM thereupon. 
 
 -And thefe Confiderations you know, Sir, wrouglit fb 
 far with me, that I thought it unnecelfary any thing 
 Ihould be offer'd in print, either for the Vindication of 
 our Patron, or the Satisfaction of others. And herein 
 you feemM heretofore to concur with me. Nev^ertheiefs, 
 lincc as well upon the faid accounts, as to jullify our 
 felves from fome groundlefs liirmifes, you judge it need- 
 ful fbmething fliould be faid ; I am ready to commu- 
 nicate a few things that occur'd to me in the perufal 
 of the Remains (for to take notice of every thing that 
 would bear a Reflexion, would be an endlefs labour ) 
 and fhall leave it to your Difcretion to make what ule 
 of them you think fit. 
 
 It was not to be expeded, but that one fpecious 
 Pretence or other would be made ufe of to palliate the 
 matter, and the rather, bccaule the moft unbecoming 
 Adlions ( like the homelieft Faces ) require the moft 
 Art to fet them off. And therefore to make Bookfeller 
 and Buyer the better to fwallow the Pill, nothing 
 lefs is " pretended than the gratifyng tlie Learned 
 World, and erecting a Ufting Monument of Fraife to the 
 Bifljofs Memory, by the Publication of this Book. As to 
 the latter part of the Plea, it muft be owned that tlie 
 Pious Architect's Zeal for the Bifhop's Honour has tranf^ 
 ported him fo far, that rather than want Materials for a 
 Monument, he has piled together fuch defpicable ones, 
 as if compar'd with others the Bifliop has Mt behind 
 Him, would make Him lamented as buried in Ruins. 
 
 C How 
 
( 10 ) 
 
 Mow far he defign'd to oblige the World by this Col- 
 lection of ReUcks, is only difcernible to the Searcher of 
 Hearts; but how far he has compafs'd that Defign, o- 
 thers may judge: And I can't forbear (on this Occa- 
 fion ) refleQing on the fubtile Trade which the Romifh 
 Fryars drive in vending the Relicks of their Sai/jts, 
 which, there are fhrew'd Temptations to believe, is not 
 fo much for the benefit of the People as themfelves. 
 
 But that which feems a Jefi upon the Reader's Un- 
 derftanding, is, that the Editor would make him be- 
 
 Wp'567- ^^^^-^ ^^^^^ tender of (4) [willing the Volume' to too great a 
 bulk, when 'tis vifible he has Icraped together both 
 Old and New, Good and Bad, Genuine and Adulterate, 
 the one to be a Vehicle to the other, and both together 
 to fcrew Mr. Duntcn up to a Pitch. If the World be 
 fb Superftitious as to be fond of Relicks, does lie think 
 Men will renounce their Senfes too, and m fpight of 
 them believe that he is in good earnefl: careful not to 
 be too bulky, when to advance the number of Sheets 
 lie has added feveral of his own, and patch'd up a. 
 third part of the reft of the Book out of old Pieces, 
 witnefe the Preface to the Gun-powder Treafbn, the 
 
 ' Trad againft Baxter, and the two Metaphyfical Excr- 
 
 citations ; when he has glean'd up a parcel of private 
 Letters and Correfpondencies, and much other crude 
 and indigefted Matter, which we may reafbnably pre- 
 fiime the Bilhop would never have defired fhould have 
 lecn any other light after his death, but that of the 
 Elames ? 
 
 • In the Diredions to a Young Divine, there are abun° 
 dance of things marfliall'd under that Head, which the 
 Bifhop never intended for that purpoie. Amongft o- 
 thers, there's a Syllabus of Socinian Qucftions foifted in; 
 concerning which 'twould perhaps puzzle the Editor to 
 
 f ' ~ ' give 
 
C " ) 
 
 give a fatlsfadory Anfwer to any of thefe Four Quefti- 
 ens. B^hy it was Printed at aH ? Why at fuch an unfea- 
 fonahle time ? Why under a falfe and improper Head? And 
 why fo Ume and imperfe^ ? 
 
 Why Printed at all? Was it that the Editor would 
 have the Bifhop thought an Abettor of Socinianifm? 
 from which he Irood at as great a Diftance, as one part of 
 a Contrad6lion from the other, as every one knows that 
 was not a meer Stranger both to his Writings and Con- 
 verfation. Or was it for the general Information of 
 Mankind, in a part of knowledge they might with 
 more fafety be ignorant of? The Socinians are look'd 
 upon by Ibme as great Mafters of reafbning, and 
 perhaps they bid as fair for it, as the weaknefs of the 
 Caufe, they maintain, will admit of: So that what 
 M. Cato oblervM of C^far, feems in Ibme wife applicable 
 to SocinuSy Unum ex Omnibus ad Kvertendam Rempublicam 
 [ Chrifiianam ] Sobrium accef/iffe. And his Opinions 
 being fb dangerous to the Foundation of Chriftianity, 
 it is fomewhat unaccountable what necefFity there 
 was, to be directed to Chapter, Page, and Section, 
 where to find them alTerted to all the advantage they 
 arc capable of: Efpecially if we confider, that Men 
 are naturally too inquifitive aktr forbidden Knowledge: 
 The Experiment colt our firft Parents very dear, and 
 their Pofterity have ever had Tuch a fatal Curiofity to 
 pry into the Errors of former Ages, as never needs to 
 be fet on edge. Whatfoever therefore the Bifhop might 
 Communicate to a particular Friend, and one that was 
 more than ordinarily curious in the Study of Theological 
 Matters ( as the Prefacer has it ) yet he could never 
 intend that Syllabus of Queftions ( in the drels it ap- 
 pears in) for common and Publick Ufe: Much lefs 
 would he ever have confented to the difperfing of it 
 
 at. 
 
( 12 ) 
 
 at fuch a time as this, when the Peftilent Herefies of 
 Socinus are more induftrioufly propagated in the Na- 
 tion than ever. 
 
 But there is yet more Injuftice done the * Bifhop, 
 by Printing it under an .improper Head. 'Tis certain 
 he never made That any part of his Inftrudlions to a 
 young Divine, either in that Copy the Editor met 
 with or any other. For the Learned Prelate could 
 not be ignorant, how dangerous it might prove to a 
 Novice in Divinity, to direct him to a number of So- 
 cinian Writers, without Signifying withal where to 
 find their Errors confuted. This had been to prefcribe 
 Poifon without it's Antidote ; to pervert and lead aftray 
 his young Student, rather than inilrud him in the right 
 Search of Truth, and fo to influence his more injudi- 
 cious years with the leaven of Herefie, as it might 
 cofl: liim fbme time and pains to wear off the Imprci^ 
 lion. 
 
 But laftly, if printed it mu/l^ be, and at an urfea- 
 fontihle time too, and moreover under an improper 
 Head J why was it after all lent abroad ^o lame and 
 imperfecta I mean^ without thofc references to Orthodox 
 Authors, who have defignedly and fuccefsfully writ 
 againft the Soeinians, and which are found in the 
 Bifhop's Original Papers ? I am not willing indeed to 
 believe that the ColleQ:or omitted them out of any 
 affcdion to Socinianifm. No, to do him right, he is 
 fb true to his main end, and has fo carefully inferted 
 ( without Diftinftion ) whatever might ferve to pro- 
 mote it, that he can't be fufpeded to poftpone his In- 
 tereft in favour of that, or any other Perfwafion what- 
 Ibever. And therefore we may well enough fuppofc 
 he has left out nothing that was in the Copy he met 
 with : But then, is there not reafon to expoftulate the 
 
 Cafe 
 
C 73 ) 
 
 Cafe v/itli him, why this or any^ thing elfe fliould be 
 publifli'd under a great Name from Copies defeclivc 
 or unfiniilf d, to the Impairing of the Author's Repu- 
 tation, and rather injury than benefit of others ? But 
 to make no more words about it, to fliew how Genu- 
 ine a Remain this fame (amongft others) is, I have lent 
 you what I find in the Bifhop's MSS concerning the 
 Anti-Socinian Writers, which I fliould think, ought ra- 
 ther to have been Printed fingle, and the other omit- 
 ted, than the contrary. 
 
 What follows the Directions (to Page 58^.) is little 
 elfe but fbme private Letters and Icatter'd Papers, glean'd 
 up from leveral Quarters ; many of which are not to 
 be found amongft the Bilhop's Writings j a certain figii 
 this, that if they be Genuine, he fct little or no value 
 on them; it being his conftant Method, when he communi- 
 cated any thing he valued, to his Friends, to defire them 
 to return the Copy, or at leaft to caufe it to be tran- 
 fcribed before he fent it. Amongft his Papers there 
 are found Letters writ from every Corner of the Com- 
 pafs, and amongft others, fome fign'd with P. P. and 
 dated from the Strand, near the May-pole, If all 
 were fuch as His, it would be worth the while to 
 make a F relent of them to the Haberdafher of Small- 
 wares in the PouUrey, But I would firft know whe- 
 ther P. P. would take it well to have His Expos'd to 
 publick Cenfure. The Prefacer to the Remains ^ ( if that 
 be his Name at large) fays that no Works are more 
 grateful to Critical Readers, than fuch as are compri- 
 zed by way of Epiftle. Now I do alfure him. His are 
 very entertaining that way ; and if we fliould divert 
 the Reader at his coft, it would be but a juft Reta- 
 liation. However, his Letters will be kept by way of 
 Reprizal for further Service. 
 
 D Next 
 
( t4 ) 
 
 Next in order follow a Preface to a Difcourfe con- 
 cerning the Cxunporvder-Tre/tfon, an Anfwer to a Tracl 
 of Mr. BAxter\y and a little after two Metaphyfical 
 Exercitations^ all which being in Print before, 'tis hard 
 to fay for what end they are now Re-printed, unlefs 
 to fwell the Volume, and thereby lay a Tax upon the. 
 Subjc<El. I believe few will think the Tranilator of 
 the Exercitations has merited any thing by his pains,, 
 either from the Bifliop or the Reader. For of good La- 
 tine States, he has made them but very indifferent Eng- 
 lijh ones, and as unintelligible to the i^^gUfh Reader, (for 
 whom, I fuppofe, they were defign'd ) as Rofacrufian- 
 Philolbphy. 
 
 The like, nay much worfe Treatment have the States 
 of Queilions met with, which begin f. 568. and fo ia 
 a manner clofe the Book. Thefe they have given us 
 ia fuch an Heterogeneous, Equivocal Mungrel Verfion,. 
 as I defy the whole Fraternity of Tranflators to match, 
 from the famous R, JL. down to M\» School-boys. So 
 that it may truly be vouched upon this occafion, if 
 ever, FacJunt inteUigendo ut nihil intelligmt. Befides 'tis 
 manifeft, the Bifhop has writ them haftily and incuri- 
 oufly ; And though probably he might fometimes read 
 them in the College Chappel, yet it can no more from- 
 thence be concluded, that he calculated them for thcL 
 Frefs, than that a Man defigns every thing he utters 
 amongft private Friends fhould be proclaimed at the 
 Crofs. But whatfoever they are in themfelves, they 
 have fuffer'd in many places, by being garbled, depra- 
 ved and ill Tranflated, and fometimes by the omiuion 
 of ( what was of great Ufe in fuch ihort and imperfe£fc 
 Trads) the References to particular Authors, who 
 have handled the Points more copioufly. 
 
 That 
 
C 15 ) 
 
 That this Charge may not feem to be laid without' 
 Ground, I will give you a few Specimens of the Tran- 
 flator's or Tranfcriber's Performance in one of the States. 
 And to prevent all Sufpicion, as if I intended to ag- 
 gravate the matter, and with a Ipitcful Diligence to 
 cull cut the worft for a Pattern of the refl, I will be 
 fb fair as to look no farther than into the very firil 
 Queftion that offers it felf, and from theiKe leave o- 
 thers to judge what may be expected in the reft. 
 
 The firft Qiieftion then is, ^ An Pr^fcientia Divina. * ^. 568, 
 a Rebus prxvifis tollat ContingentiAm ? where we need 
 not feek far before the Tranllator gives us fbme Tryals 
 of his Skill. For in the very firft Page but one, and 
 within the compafs of half of it, there are half as ma- 
 ny Blunders as Lines. Inftead of Alicui fr^fens ejfe^ 
 (lin, 14. ) as it is in the Original, and as die Author's 
 Senfe requires it Oiould be, we read corruptly, Alicujus 
 fYdfens effe. The Bifhop is proving that a Future Con- 
 tingent, cannot be a6:ua}ly Prelent ( Scienti^ etiam Dt- 
 vijKt ) even to Divine Knowledge ; and gives this Rea- 
 fbn for it, becaufe Alicui frafens effe fuppomt ejp ex parte 
 reiy To be prefent to any one, &c. not alicujuo-, but 
 a/icui in the fame Cafe with Scientid Divina, This, 
 'tis true, may be a flip of the Prefs, but it looks much 
 liker an Error elfewhere. 
 
 Two or three Lines further the Bifhop adds, Cum ideo 
 Deu^ prafcivif Ftifura Contingentia ah 4:terno, necejje efi- 
 itt ipfi etiam fint futura^ nernpe reJ^eBu a^ualis exifie/i'^ 
 tr£. This is rendered, When therefore God did fore- 
 know future Contingencies from Eternity, it is necef^ 
 fary that they fhould be to him even Future. Now 
 any School-boy would have render'd \_Cum ideo'] pro- 
 perly [ Since therefore ] ; and neceffe efi ut ipfi etiam fint 
 faturdy Ihould likewifc have been turn'dj U is necejfarj 
 
 that 
 
( I-? ) 
 
 ihat they he future even to him^ or to him alfo^ not to 
 him even future; becaule, 'tis plain, Etiam makes Ipji 
 Emphatical, not Ftitura; agreeably to the Bilhop's de- 
 fign, which was to prove that Future Contingents are 
 future even to God, is, to liim as well as to others ; 
 that which fbme, whom he mentions, did deny. 
 
 But the next words that follow are perverted more 
 inexcufably. The words in the MS. are, Futura Qon- 
 tingentiA ah sterna non ermt, v/hich the unskilful Gar- 
 bler has turnM, Fhey were not futura, contingent ia ab 
 Aterno ; which neither anfwers the Bifliop's Latin, nor 
 his Argument, nor makes him write confidently with 
 Truth, or with himfelf. It anfwers not his Latin ; 
 For thefe words Futura, contingentia ah aterno non erant, 
 arc a Propofition fecundi Adjacentis ( as the Logicians 
 term it) wherein the Verb includes both the CopuU 
 and the Predicate ; and fb non erant fignifies as much 
 as non exiftehant, or non erant exiftentia : and the Senfe 
 of the words will be, that Future Contingents were not 
 exiftentfrom all Eternity. This will appear plain enough, 
 if we confider the Argument. For the Biiliop's Alfer- 
 tion immediately preceding is, that Future Contin- 
 gents could not be prefent with God from Eternity, 
 in refpedl of their adual Exiftence; the medium where- 
 by he proves it exprefly, is, becaufe Future Contingents 
 ab sterna non erant, were not exiftent from Eternity, 
 therefore he infers from Eternity they could not be pre^ 
 lent with God. Thus it appears the Tranllator lias 
 neither underftood the Senle of the Bilhop's words, 
 nor the drift of his Argument : and yet both thefe are 
 more pardonable, than to make him alTert that which 
 is really falie in it felf, and moreover a Contradidi- 
 on to what he had faid juft before. It is falfe to fay, 
 They were not future Qomngentia ah jEterno; for fu- 
 ture 
 
C 17 ) 
 
 ture Contingents were fuch from Eternity ; the matter 
 of this Proportion, for Inftance, Petrm Dominum ab- 
 negahit^ being future and contingent from Eternity. And 
 if they were not from Eternity, then tliey could not be 
 fore-known by God from Eternity ; but the BiQiop had 
 faid in the words foregoing, that God fore-knew them 
 from Eternity : Therefore to make Him alTert that Fu- 
 ture Contingents were not from Eternity, is to make 
 him inconfillent with himfelf : For which all due Thanks 
 to the Tranflator's Care and Judgment. 
 
 If any of the forementionM Miltakes fcem too light 
 to be animadverted upon ; yet Miflakes they are, and 
 llich as none that had rightly underlfood what he 
 had been about, could have been guilty of. And Hum- 
 bling upon fo many within fb Ihort a compals, and 
 at the very Threfliold ( as it were ), I thought I 
 needed go no further in; looking upon tliefe as an 
 Omen, or fufficient warning what we have to truft 
 to elfewhere. 
 
 But befides the unfaithfulncfs of the Verfion-part 
 either the Tranfcriber of the States ( whom the Editor 
 Ipeaks of p. 567. ) took but imperfedl Copies of 
 them, or the IVanflator has alTum'd ( by what autho- 
 rity, I know not ) an Inquifitorial Power of Purga- 
 tion, or rather Depravation, through the whole. And 
 of this alfb ( according to promile ) I will feek for 
 no other proof, but what the iiril Queftion furnilhes 
 us with. 
 
 The Bifhop, it feems, refolves it into thefe two 
 Conclufions : 
 
 1 . Quod, Deus Futurx Contingentia, cognofcat. 
 
 2. Quod cognitio hdc eorum contingent tAtn non toll at. 
 The former ( viz. ) Tliat God do's foreknow future 
 
 Contingents, he proves, againfl: the Socinians, by three 
 
 E Argu- 
 
C i8 ) 
 
 Arguments ; the firft of which is taken from God^s 
 Foreknowledge and PrediO:ion of the Circumftances of 
 our Saviour's Conception and Birth. This the Pur- 
 gator has vouchfafed to tranfmit more faithfully than 
 the other, though not entirely neither. But for the 
 other two, he has fb contra6led them into Short-hand, 
 that they are rather Hints than Arguments, as is eafily 
 perceiv'd by comparing the Arguments asmanaged by 
 the Bifhop, and as dock'd and mangled in the Remains. 
 
 The Bifliop's Second Argument ftands thus: 
 
 2. Joh. 19. V. 36. Chriflo de arhore infelici SuJpe;^[o^. 
 una cum Sieariis^ accedufit Milites ; reliquorum crura jran— 
 gunt^ fed Chrifii crura, integrx relinquunt & ilUfa : Ratio- 
 nem reddit Textm^ Omnia, h<sc g^fi^ funt, ut Scripture 
 impleretur^ dicens^ Non frangetur ejus os unum. Cum 
 ideo hoc Detis fr^dixit^ cumq\ contingens omnino erat^ (Mi- 
 lites enim potentiam habuerunt liber am^ ut frangerent^ & 
 Chrifii crura t/ilia. erant^ ut facile jr an gi poterant ) ma^ 
 mfefium ell Futura. contingentia Deo effe certo cognitai 
 DicOy Certo cognovit Dem crura non ejfe frangenda^ alias 
 falli foterat^ quod tamen Sacer Text us exprefe negat, Joh. 
 10. 35. Si illos dixit Deos, ad quos Sermo Dei fadus 
 eft, 8c Scriptura folvi non poteft, &c. SciL fi Chriflo 
 fdeSy Scriptural i'vvAleu w^nvAi, non pot eH folvi ^ i. e. violari 
 Aut irrita reddi ; » J'vyAJa.i p^v^hcct, non pojjibile efl^ feu (quod- 
 idem ) imfoffibile eft ut folvatur : Et ideo necejje eft ut 
 Tutura Contingentia it a eveniant prout ^radixit Deus, 
 
 Here is fbme Management of an Argument in this; 
 but one muft have very good Eyes, or elfe the Tran- 
 slator's Spedacles, that can difcern the true ftrefs of 
 it, as he has order'd it.; which take as follows, at 
 Large. ' " . 
 
Cl9 ) 
 
 \And: then h was foretold^ that not a Bone of Chrtli 
 fhoHld be broken on the Crof^^ And many Circumfiances rvere 
 'verijied according to the Prophejies of old therein. 
 
 The fame Fate has the Bifhop's Third Argument un- 
 dergon, ivhicli in the MS. runs thus, 
 
 1 . Dem hoc fihi arrogat ut tncommunicabile Deitatis pri- 
 'vilegium^ quodfutitrapranHntiet, Ifa. 41. 22, 2^. Sic enim 
 Def^ falfos alloquitur Prophetas — Annuntiate futura, ut 
 cognofcamus, quia Dii eftis. Sic Ifa. 44. 6, 7. Praeter 
 me non eft Deus : quis mihi finiihs ? Vocet d)C de- 
 nuntiet, ex quo conftitui populum antiquum ; ventura 
 &• futura annuntient iis. Sic Dan, 2. Myfterium, quod 
 Rex interrogat, Sapientes, Magi, Arioh &- Aruf pices ne- 
 queunt indicare Regi; fed eft Deus in Coelo revelans 
 myfteria, qui indicabit Tibi, O Rex, quae ventura funt 
 in noviflimis temporibus. Nempe futura in novifftrnis 
 temporibm revelat Dem^ eaq\ contingentia : nam f 1°' J 
 Ttttura necefjaria non folum D^mones^ fed & homines fa- 
 pent es revelare pot er ant ; at futura, de quib us facer Tex- 
 tus hie loquitur^ Deus pbi-ipft foli arrogat revtlanda f 2°.^ 
 futura de quibus hie loquitur Daniel, erant de regno Chrifti 
 Sub Evangelio, de regno Babjlonico, Perfico^ MacedonicOy. 
 Romano ; futura fcil. per homines Uberrima adminifirata* 
 At hdic omnia certo & infalltbt liter prddixit Deus, Ergo^ 
 Futura contingentia certo cognofcit. 
 
 Of all this the Epitomizer vouchfafes to give us only, 
 a fhoit hint in thele words : 
 
 This Fore-knowledge in Scripture God alTumes to 
 Himfelf, and upbraids the Falfe Prophets^ becaufe they did 
 not know things to come, Ifa. 44. Dan. 2. 
 
 The Bifhop having faid all he thought neceflary up- 
 on the firft j ofttion above-mention'd, viz. That God 
 fore-knows future Contingents^ he refers his Hearers for 
 
 further 
 
( 20 ) 
 
 fuither Information to feveral ^ Au- 
 ■^^^ifuir!ivcllct,A<]idn.vi^^^^^^ thors, wlio handle it more largely^ 
 
 ][' I: '^n' It ^'cimme^^^^^^^ whomtlie TurgatOF has very judici- 
 
 .zbt p.ijfmi onmei, frxcipuc Fran- OUily pafsM OVCr, thoUgh One WOuId 
 
 cijh. Cumci, Vartar. DOpf: ^n j.j^-^|^ |^^l^ References were of moft 
 
 primarn partem Amnn. tiui per ^^,, . ^,,-, ^ ri ^c^^ 
 
 'iot.tm de Prsfciemia Dci area Ule m Abltracts, Or Ihort btatcs. 
 Ftif. cmtivg. fuse difpmat ^ YoLi fee»I have run through the Book^ 
 7icrvosc, &c. 1^^^^ ^^j.g^, ^ Defliltory manner : Yet 
 
 thefe Evidences (out of many that might be pro- 
 duced ) are fufficient to flievv what an unhmited and 
 an unwarrantable Liberty is taken, not only to publifh 
 things without the Author's Confent, either exprefs or 
 prefumptive, but alfb to maim, corrupt andabuie them, 
 and after all to Palm them for Genuine upon the World. 
 I would here make an end, but that the Editor has 
 contrived fuch a Remain for the clofe of his Book, as 
 deferves not to be pafs'd over without an Obiervation. 
 ™_-- 'Tis a Letter of the Bifliop's to his Clergy^ occafwnd by 
 an Order ofSefftons^ for the Profecution of the Laws againji 
 DiJJentersy which whatever Service or Credit it may do 
 the Bifhop, I am fure can do the Editor neither. For 
 "tis notorious that Sir P. P. has been a Champion for 
 Toleration ; witnefs the Cafe of Toleration heretofore 
 Printed with his Name to it, and his Preface to a for- 
 mer Book of the BiQiop of Lincoln s Tracts : And yet 
 he has taken care to let the World underftand by this 
 Letter, that the Bifhop thought the Laws again ft Dif- 
 fenters good, and their Execution neceifary, and that 
 he not only requir'd his Clergy to publifh the above- 
 faid Order, and diligently to advance the defign of it, 
 but inforc'd the Rcafonablenefs of Conformity to the 
 Eftablifht Church by fuch Arguments, as in my opinion, 
 ^tis fcarce poflible to comprife more or weightier in lb fmall 
 a compafs. The Letter is but of two Pages,and if you have 
 read it, pray tell me whether the Bp. has not fajd as much 
 
 as 
 
(21 ) 
 
 las could well be fald,In ib few lines, &• what your thou2;hcs 
 were upon reading of it. Was it not obvious to conceive 
 tliat Confidcring Men would begin to quelf ion, whether 
 theDifcourfe for Toleration,Printed amongil others lately 
 under the Bp'sName,were really the Bp's, or Ibme ^S'uppO' 
 fitkious Piece? (And then let Sw P, lee how he will avoid 
 the fufpicion of Forgery). Or if they acquit Sk P. in that, 
 they would at leal? perceive, that how realbnable fbever 
 in the Theory a Toleration might Teem to the Bp. yet \vhea 
 he came to reduce it to Practice, and have to do with the 
 troublefbme Sprit of our Diffenters^ he found it not fcafi- 
 b!e,nor confiftent with the Weal of tlie Church : And then 
 let ^Sir P. (the Champion for Toleration,) fee how he will 
 juftify the Publilliing fo much againft a Toleration, and 
 under a Government too, that he would fain flatter for 
 having granted it, and Elfabliflit it by Law. 
 
 I fear I hav^e tranfgrefsM the bounds of a Letter ; there- 
 fore I flaall add no more, f ave only to put in a fliort Caveat 
 or two. And in the firft place, Caveat Emptor^ let the Pur- 
 chafer beware hereafter, how he is impos'd upon by <Sur- 
 reptitious Pieces. All Coins have not the true *S/^4/;?/? ; and 
 fome tliat have, have too great a mixture of the Alloy in 
 the Metal to pafs currant. 
 
 And if I might be admitted for once to be of Counfel to 
 Perlbns of Quality and Learning, I would humbly advife 
 them to be very cautious whom they admit a Secretii^ left 
 it be their lot (as it has been lately of a ^Spiritual and a 
 Temporal * Lord) to have their Privacies expos'd hy^vtd, Str 
 fome Relick-Monger or other. I am joh Thom- 
 
 pfon';F;n- 
 
 Your affeaionate Friend fhcZVl 
 
 and Servant, 
 
 QueenV-College, 
 June 10. 1694. 
 
 Hen. brougham. 
 
 F WhAt 
 
C 22 ) 
 
 U^at relates to the Socinian Controverfiey and is 
 found in the BifliopV MS. but omitted in thd 
 Remains, is as follows :^ 
 
 An Myfteria.Fidei a ratione nAtUYali dp^rehendf foffuptt ?/ 
 
 Negant, 
 
 !■. T Ubbertus de Chrifto Servatore. /. 4. cap, 1 2.pag. 5S2 , 
 
 _L 2. Jac. ad Portura Orthodoxa fidei defenfione. 
 sap. ^o. pag. ^-jj,. 
 
 J.. Ludovicus Crocius in Atiti-SociHianifmo. Dijp. j^ 
 
 4. Andreas Prolaeus in Mataeologia fua Sociniana. c. 2. . 
 /^. 21, 22. &c, 
 
 5. Chriftianus Dithmarfus in Goll. Exercitationum 
 Anti-Socinianarum. Exercit, 2./>. ^2. &t, 
 
 6. Balth. MeifncrusConfiderat. TheoIogisePIiotinianae. 
 cap,j^,pag. 310. 
 
 7. Job. Hoornebeck Soeinianifmi Conflitati, Tom, i. 
 L i.f. f^, fusK 
 
 8. Sam. Marefius in Hydra Soeinianifmi confutata./. i. 
 €. 2$. f. 392. 
 
 9. Suarez Opulc. //^. 5. f^/. i% 2*. 
 
 10. Pet. Lombard. Sent. Lib. 2, Dijp, 26, Y id. Com-^ 
 mentatores, ibid, 
 
 11. Aquinas. 22. ^^f/. 2. u^r;. ^. 4. d' Commenta- 
 toresj , ikjd. 
 
C 23 ) 
 
 An Socimani ft fit vers Chrifiiani ? 
 
 Negant, 
 
 i.T Udov. Crocius Anti-Socinianifmi. Dijp.i.^./^, 
 _L 2. Andraeas Prolxus in Mataeol. Sociniana. c. i,. 
 
 ^. Bakhaf. Meifnerus in brevi Confid. Thcologiae 
 Photinianae, c, ^^ pag. 294. & c, 5. pag. 6^4. 
 
 4. Jacob. Maitinus. Synopfi Religionis Photinianae;?. 
 C4p. 6. §. 26. pag. 144. d* f. i.§. 14. 
 
 5. Joh.Polyander Concertat. Anti-Sociniana.i^D//^.4,5. 
 
 6. Job. Hoornebeck Socinianifmi Confut. Tom. i./. 2, 
 c ^» pag* 1S8. 
 
 Authores alfqui qui contra T. Socinum Senenfem^ f^t^^) 
 fequaces fcripfernnt, 
 
 i.TAcobus ad Portiim, 6"^. Theologiae in Acad. Laufan- 
 J nenli ProfeiTor, fcripfit Defenfionem Fidei Orthodox^. 
 
 zdvei'iusChriJ-ophor^ Ofiorodii Infiitutiones ReltgionpsChri-- 
 
 fiinna^ Gencv. Edit. An. 161^. 4^0. 
 
 2. Sibrandus Lubbertus fcripfit contra F. Socinum,. 
 
 lib. 4. de Jefu Qhrifto Servatore. 4^0. 
 
 ^. Andreas ElTenius -v^rt^s-M^ Hug. Grotii fcripfit Lib. . 
 
 cui Titulus- — Triumphus Crucis^feu Fides CathoUca de Sa- 
 
 tisfaHione Chrifii contra Joh. Crellium Fran. ^^^. 
 
 4. Johan. Henr. Bifterfcldius NafTovius fcripfit de Vno 
 Deo, Patre, Filio, & Spiritu SanClo^ contra Jph. CrtUii^ 
 1.2. de Vno Deo Pat re. Lug. Bat. 16^9. 4^0^ 
 
 5. Wolfangus Franzius fcripfit Difp. varias adverfus< 
 Fhotinianos pro Satisfa^f tone Chrifii, Sub hoc Titulo, Dif- 
 put At tones Theolog. de Sacrifciis Satiifa^ionis Chrifti pro ■ 
 feccatis totiui Mundipr^fiita. Tvpis Firmiffimis. 4^°. 
 
 6.Chri-:- 
 
C 24 ) 
 
 6. Cliriflanus Matthias Dithmarfus In Acadcmia Norl- 
 corum Altorlina Profeilor, fcripfit &" edidit Collegium Exer- 
 citAtionum Theologicartim Anti-Phot inianum^ in quo Dijpu- 
 tationes decern, (i.) De Notitiae Dei naturalis exillentia 8c 
 elTentia. (2.) De Notitiae naturalis ufu &: efficacia. (j.) 
 De O'.ovouiA, i. e. Nomenclatura Divina in genere &■ in fpecie 
 de nomine Jehova. (4.) De appellatione Defi^. (5.) De ap- 
 pellatione Jdon, KJe^©-, Domintis. (6.) De Dei definitione, 
 genere &■ Praedicatorum qualitate. (7.) DeElIentiae Divi- 
 naeunitate. (8.) Denatura Attributorum Divinorum ad 
 intYA conlideratorum. (9.) De Attributis Divinis ad^xtra, 
 (10.) De ordine Attributorum Divinorum. 4^0. 
 
 7. Valentinus Legdaeus Suerinenfis edidit Examen nfu- 
 tationisVdent, Smalcti^ quam Tbefibm Albert t Graiveri de 
 JLterm Deitate & Incarnatione Filti Dei^ oppofuit. 4^0. 
 
 8. Joh. Winterus Naumbergenfis edidit refutationem 
 Sententt£ F. Socini de Juiliticatione hominis coram Deo, 
 quam tradat in praeledlionibus TheoJog. ca^, i 5. Probie- 
 mata Socini quinq; ponit & refellit. 4^0. 
 
 1. An in Juftificatione noftra peccata noftra deleantur 
 iiuda remifTione/ine S.atisfa&ione ? AfTerit Socinus. 
 
 2. A\\ Deus poterat peccata condonare fine Satisfadi- 
 one ? AiTerit Socinus. 
 
 3. An Vitse innocentia poflit cenferi loco Satisfadionis, 
 &: articulum Juftificationis ingredi ? AiTerit Socinus. 
 
 4. Aw Deus voluerit peccata fme fatisfactione condo- 
 nare? AiTerit Socinus. 
 
 5. An Chriftus pro peccatis nollris fatisfecerit ? Negat 
 Socinus. Idem fcripfit QolUtionem & Differentiam Vet. 
 & A^oi/.Teftamenti Sucerdotum : Item Tradatum de 
 .jbac quseftione, An AdAmusinftatu Integritatu fuerit 
 MortAlis f AiTerit Socinus. Negat Wmterus. 
 
 9. Joh. Junius Ecclcfiae Sylvae Ducenfis Faftor fcripfit 
 Refutationem Prale^iontimTheologicarumV^ Socini Senen- 
 %Amftelod. 165J. h°, 
 
 10. Bal- 
 
(25) 
 
 10. Balthazar Meifherus in Academia Wittcbcrgciifi 
 Profellor fcripfit Lib. cui Tit. Brevis Confideratio Theo- 
 logize Photi/7ia?7a:^ p'out earn F. Socinu^ defcripfit libello 
 
 cui titulus Ouod Evangelici omnino dehent fe tllorum 
 
 ccettii adju'rigerej qui fdso Ariani & Ehionita vocan- 
 tur, 8^0. 
 
 11. Jacob. Martin, fcripfit Lib. cui tit Synoffts 
 
 t otitis Keligionis Vhotininna: ex tllorum Inflittitione bre- 
 njiy Volkelio^ OfiorodOj aliijq\ ejus fe^ia authoribus repe- 
 tit(Z & breviter refutata. S^o. 
 
 12. Johan. Junius Ecclefia Ailcndelphenfis Minifler 
 fcripfit Examen Rejponfionis F. Socini ad Librum Jacobi 
 JVieki, de Divinitate Filii Dei, & Spirits San^i, Am- 
 Udod. An. 1628. 8vo. 
 
 i^. Johan. Polyander ProfefTor Leidenfis fcripfit 
 Lib. cui Tit. Prima concertatio Anti-Sociniana Dijputa- 
 tiombus 48. comfrehenfa, Amftcl. An. 1640. 8*'o. 
 
 14. Joh. Paulus Fetwinger in Acad. Altdorphina A- 
 lumnorum Noricorum Ephorus fcripfit Lib. cui Titu- 
 lus Vindicia Incarnationii Jefu Chrifii aterni Patrif 
 
 atemi Filii, pro Alberto Grawero ProfefTore olim Je- 
 nenfi. 8^0. 
 
 15. Andreas '^ Keflerus *Superintendens Eisfeldenfis * /^cw Ke- 
 fcripfit Lib. cui Tit. Phyfica Photinian^ Examen, ^Q,^tv\^^^\ittx. 
 An. 1650. 8vo. _ ^^^1 
 
 16. Jacob. Martin, fcripfit Lib. cui Tit. ^, Martini ex Soant^i- 
 de tribu6 Elohim Liber primus. Photinianorum novorum^^'^ ^'^^' 
 fracipHe Georg. Emeldeni blajphemiis oppoftu^. An. 1619. 
 Oclavo. 
 
 17. Andreas Volanus fcripfit Lib. cui tit. Par^nefis 
 Ard. Volani ad omnes in regno Polonia^ magno Ducatu 
 Lithuania^ Somofateniana T>ocirina Profeffores : cr ad no- 
 njA Ebionitarum contra Paranefm obje^a rejfontio. Spira:. 
 An. 1582. 
 
 G 18. Pro- 
 
jS. Frodiit not ita pridem Libellus cui titulus, Spci- 
 men refutAtionis lihri Johanis CreSu de Satisfa£tione (Shri- 
 fit, Authore L. V. &c. Trajedli ad Rhenum. Anv 
 
 1648. 12"^0. 
 
 ^Videfis 19- Extat Meditatio Theologica de ufu '^ & ahufu 
 kac de YAt'tonis HumAna in interfretAndis & ajlimandis rebus 
 ^iu°yn!w ^ Scripturis Divinis, per CSjA. Lug. Batav^. 163^.12^0, 
 dejndke 20. Ambrofius de Penalofa fcripfit Opus egregium de 
 i§ norma Chrlftl & Sfiiitus San^i DivinitAte, & TrinitAtis My- 
 ^l'^ll^jj°J!' fier 10 contv2i ^Socinianos. An. 1635. Fol. 
 rinnLi- 21. Nicolaus AmoMus Polonus Ecclefise Beetkumange 
 hros duos, _\4ini{ler librum edidit cui Tit. JohAn, Maccoviu^s Redi- 
 foH. An. I'ivi^j continensv i. nf^T^v 4dr=/if Pontificiorum Soci- 
 1644- nianorum, &c, 2. Cafiis Confcientiae ad normam Do- 
 
 Qrinae 6'ocinian32. ^. Anti-^ocinum, cum Appendice 
 
 de Atheis. An. 1647. 4^°. 
 
 22. Hugo Grotius de SatiifAHione Chrifii contra^ F. 
 U.i.S9cino.Socinum || cui refp.. Andreas EfTenuis in Triumpho Cruets^ 
 
 &■ L. V. in Specimine refutationis Job, Crellii de Satif^ 
 
 fABione Chrifti, 8^°. 
 
 2^. Vid. Ludov. Lucium de SAtisfA^iiom Chrifii contra 
 
 Michaelem Gettichium. Edit. BAfiL 161 2. 8^°. 
 
 24. Lambert. Danae-us in P. Lomb. Sentent. lib. i . mul- 
 ta pro Trinitate difputat. Edit An. 1 580. 8^0. 
 
 25. Chriftianus Becn^annus Bornenfis edidit Exerci- 
 tationes Tbeolog, pro DeitAte Chrifii^ &c. contra Socinum, 
 Smalcium, Ollorodumj Crellium, Mennonem Simonis,. 
 Paracelfum, Wiegelium, &c, Arnft. An. 1643. Fol. 
 
 26. Job. Paulus Felwingem fcripfit ExAmen difquifiiio^ 
 ^is h-evif edit. NovQmhQvgx. 16'^ J, 8^0. 
 
 27. Sam. Marefii Xenia Academic a, feu de DivinitAte 
 ^ & PerfonalitAte Sp.Sancti contra Socinianos (cum aliis) 4^0. 
 
 28. Difputatio Theologica Orthodoxa de SAnCiifJim^ 
 T/'/W/4^e. Authore Jofcpho Yoifin. Fay, 1647. 8^0. 
 
 29. Soc^ 
 
(27) 
 
 29. Socimanifml confutati, Tomus I . Autliore Johannc 
 Hoornebecke ProfelFore \J\tvz)Qdi^nQ.Vltrajecti . 1 6 50. 4^0. 
 
 50. Hydra Socinianifmi expignata, contra, Joh.Volkelium 
 Sc Joh. Crellium. per Sam.MarefiumjGro/^//?^^. 165 1. 4'^°^ 
 
 51. Bernardus ^2iyi'CA\x%^^n'^^\t Monomachian po defen- 
 fiofje Fidei Tr im fat If »Cr3.cov. 1616. In Bibleoth. Bodl. 
 
 ^2. Toll. Cloppenburg fcripfit Vindicias pro DeitateSp, 
 5rf;?<^/yadverrus Joh. Bidellum Anglum. Franck, 1652. 
 
 ^^. Jofuae Stegmanni PhotimanifmuSj j'eu fuccintta re^ 
 futatio error um Photinianorum^ &c. Rhinthelii. 1623. 8^°. 
 Alii pene infiniti, Pontificii pariter 8c Reformati fele 
 Socino oppolliere, ut paflini videre eft. Vide fis. 
 iEgidium Hunnium in Articulo de Trinitate. 
 Polanum in Syntagm. Theol. /. ^. c, 2. ad 11. 
 Barthol. Terres in i. part. Aquinatis. 
 Benedi£i:. 6zentkiraL. Tranfylvanum contra Georgi- 
 
 um Enjedinum. 
 Hieron. Zanchium de tribus Elohim, 8cc. 
 Hannib.Roireli Comment, in Paemandrum Hermetis. 
 Calvinum in defenfione Orthodoxae fidei lacrae Trini- 
 tatis contra M. vServetum, & Georg. Blandr. 
 
 Erafmum Brochmannum, qui utraq; Controverfiarum 
 parte quaeftiones 6ocinianas proponit & difcutit. 
 
 Dionyfium Petavium, qui fuse pariter 3f docle in Dog- 
 matis Theologicis tradlandis contra Socinum dilputat, te- 
 ftimoniis ex intimi Antiquitate petitis. 
 
 Tandem longum Scriptorum Catalogum (eorum nera- 
 pe qui contra Socinum & fui lequaces militant ) tibi ex- 
 Iiibet Chriftianus Bccmannus Bornenfis in Exercitationi- 
 bus Theologicis Amftelodami editis An. 1645. pag. 12. 
 Ubi Authores 56 plus minus enumerat, qui jullo Bello 
 SfMarte internecine contra Socinum, ipfumqietiam So- 
 einianilhium animose militant. Qui velletj videat. 
 
 Schola- 
 
(V8) 
 
 Scholaftici ( quod ad Articulum Trlnitatis attinet ) 
 in I. Sent. P. Lombard! diftincl. 2. 8c in i. parte Aqiiina- 
 tis multa difputant, curiofa magis fateor qiiam viro cor- 
 dato profutura. Quorum omnium Catalogum laboriose 
 contextum tibi exhibet Johan. Martinez de Ripalda in 
 Lib. Sent, i. Difp..2. 
 
 FINIS. 
 
 Advertisement, 
 
 A Daily OiEce for the Sick: Compil'd out of the 
 Holy Scripture, and the Liturgy of our Church. 
 With occafional Prayers^ Meditations and Dire^tioas, 
 
 The Vmtheon^ Reprefenting the fabulous Hiftories of 
 the Heathen Gods, and moft Illuftrious Heroes ; in a 
 Ihort, plain and familiar Method, by way of Dialogue, 
 for the Ufe of Schools. Written by Fya, Forney, of the 
 Society of Jefus : Author of the trench and Lutin Di- 
 Q:ionary, for the Ufe of the Daufhin, 
 
 Both Printed for J(. CUvell at the Peacock in St, Panh Church-yard. 
 

 mMf 
 
 '*'r*'l- 
 
 !fe;'" 
 
 
 :«M^ 
 
 i 
 
 Sfe*. 
 
 '#1