". ^ . O J , ^ PRINCETON, N. J. ^ Presented by~W^ 3 \ cX (S\^\' V^Wo Y^ BV 205 .M444 1876 Mell, P. H. 1814-1888. The doctrine of prayer THE DOCTRINE OF PRAYER; ITS UTILITY; AND ITS RELATION TO PROVIDENCE. BY P. H. MELL, D.D., LL.D., PROfEssoR OF Ethics and Metaphysics in the University of Georgia. N E W YORK: SHELDON & COMPANY, 8 MURRAY STREET. A MANUAL OF PARLIAMENTARY PRACTICE, MULES FOR CONDUCTINa BXTSINESS IN DELIBEBATIVE A.SSE3IBLIES. By p. H. MELL, D.D., LL.D., Professor of Ethics and Metaphysics, and Lec- turer ON Parliamentary Law in the Univertity of Georgia. Price 75 cents . Copyright, SHELDON AND COMPANY. 1876. PREFACE. Some things in the bible are matters of pure revelation ; and are to be accepted simply because they are revealed. Such doctrines, for example, as the Trinity and the Incar- nation, are addressed not to reason but to faith. They are to be accepted and sustained, not on the principles of human philosophy, but on the authority merely of God's word. In relation to such as they, all that reason can do is to demonstrate for us the divine origin of the scriptures, and to interpret their revelations about them according to the laws of language. When the doctrine is appre- hended by the understanding, however great its mystery, reason itself would say, it must be implicitly received. 4 PREFACE. Other things, again, are clearly taught in the bible, and capable of being sustained by- reason, that no finite mind can harmonize. God's sovereignty over sin and man's free agency in the commission of it, for instance, are each clearly taught in the scriptures, and commend themselves to sound reason ; but what human mind can reconcile the one with the other? Nevertheless, reason itself can see that if we cannot harmonize them, it is not because they are irreconcilable, but be- cause the subject is above human capacity. The doctrine of Prayer, though difficult of solution, is to be placed however in neither of the above categories. We are not com- pelled to accept God's precepts concerning it by mere faith ; nor are we under the ne- cessity of excusing our failure to harmonize it with other revealed truths on the ground of our want of capacity. The bible makes no formal essay to give the philosophy of prayer, nor to reconcile it with other doctrines ; but it TREFACE. 5 furnishes the means, direct and inferential, to enable any careful and competent inquirer to do so. True, the difficulties connected with the subject have perplexed many thinking minds; and its apparent conflict with the doctrine of Providence has offered encourage- ment to skeptics to attack the christian reli- gion, of which it is a part. But all this hap- pens because the doctrine is not thoroughly understood. Prayer is not a weak part of the gospel system. It can not only, by inherent force, hold its own position against all assaults, but it can furnish efficient support to other parts of the system of divine truth. The writer hopes that the following essay, which he modestly offers to the public, will tend to sustain this proposition. Athens, Ga., December 2d, 1875. CONTENTS PAOB Preface 3-5 CHAPTER I. The Doctrine of Prayer. Natural Religion teaches tlie duty II-15 Revelation teaches the duty 15 1. Epitome of the bible doctrine 15-21 2. On what subjects may men address petitions ? Question answered by, Firsts Examples given in the scriptures of prayers that were answered. 21-32 1. In the domain of grace 22-24 2. In the domains of nature and providence 24-29 a. For understanding and wisdom 24 8 CONTENTS. PAGB b. For restoration to health 25 c. For offspring, and their welfare 25, 26 d. For deliverance from prison and from distress and affliction 26 e. For the good things of this world 27, 28 f. Against the sword, judgment, pestilence and famine 28 g. For control of the seasons 28, 29 3. Examples of prayer answered in the domains of the miraculous and the supernatural 29-32 Second. The inferences that may be legitimately drawn from the general tenor of the scriptures in apswer to the question 32, 33 Third. Answer by showing what are the precepts on the subject applicable to all devout persons and to all times 33-35 The scope and the Rule of prayer given in one sentence 35 CONTENTS. 9 CHAPTER II. The Utility of Prayer. PACK The general answer to the question of its utility. ... 36, 37 Specific answers : 1. It checks the tendency to forget God. 37-40 2. It prepares men to prize the blessings God bestows 40-43 3. Makes men systematic christians 43f 44 4. Makes them stand pledged to labor for the things for which they pray 44-48 Why are christians required to pray for others? 48, 49 CHAPTER III. Prayer as Related to Providence. Does not involve absurdity and confusion, because men never truly pray excepting as God indites their petitions, proved, I. By the promise through the Prophet Zecha- "^^1 53,54 10 CONTENTS. PAGE 2. By Romans 8 : 26, 27 54-56 3. By James 5 : 16 56 4. By the fact that sincere and earnest petitions may be unavailing 57-6o Question. "Why all this formality ? God brings His people into partnership with Him in the realm of Providence also 60-63 CONCLUSION. 1. Mr. Muller 64-67 2. Prof. Tyndall 67-71 THE DOCTRINE OF PRAYER. CHAPTER I. THE DOCTRINE OF PRAYER. Prayer is natural to man. If there were no written revelation on the subject, its necessity and duty could find justification in man's constitution and condition, and in the relations he sustains to the God of nature and providence. The religious element within him, however much he may through deprav- ity resist it, prompts him to recognize the existence of a Supreme Being, to inquire after, and to worship him. This is shown by the fact that there is no tribe, however igno- rant and degraded, that is destitute of a 12 THE DOCTRINE OF PRAYER. system of religion. Everywhere, a Supreme Being is acknowledged, to whom appeals are made to turn away wrath, and to propitiate favor. Man's experience of want and suffering, his consciousness of sin, and his sense of helplessness and of dependence for things spiritual as well as temporal, prompt him to seek for help, and to ask for it from the only Being competent to give it. This would he do, when pressed by such necessity, even though he did not know that God was placa- ble and gracious ; for who knows but that a show of submission and confidence may ex- cite interest, and win kindness and favor. But convinced of God's benevolence, — know- ing that He is good and doeth. good — he is encouraged to come boldly to His throne, as to one of grace, to obtain mercy, and find grace to help in time of need. Prayer has been analyzed into Adoration ; Thanksgiving ; Confession ; and Petition — and THE DOCTRINE OF PRAYER. 1 3 perhaps exhaustively; for Adoration includes Invocation, and Petition, Intercession. Now, every one of these finds in man's nature and relations occasions for its exercise. The contemplation of high degrees of excellence in character, and the knowledge of deeds illustrious for wisdom, power and goodness, excite naturally in men's minds feelings of admiration. Let God's glorious attributes then be known — let men become acquainted with His wonderful works in crea- tion, providence and redemption, and suffi- ciently appreciate them, and their hearts will yearn to address to Him the language of Adoration and praise. Gratitude for benefits conferred, is a feel- ing nature has implanted in the human breast. So, when God has made unmistaka- ble interpositions in men's behalf, to rescue them from evil, and to impart to them good, and they have become fully sensible of the favor bestowed, there will be naturally an 14 THE DOCTRINE OF PRAYER. irrepressible desire to utter to Him the lan- guage of Thanksgiving and praise. Let one recognize his relations to the Creator and Ruler — who demands from him unreserved consecration — and let him know and, in proper degree, feel his short-comings and his sin, and nothing could prevent him from addressing to God the language of Con- fession and penitence. Show him the danger he is exposed to, the wants which press him, and the blessings that he needs, and let him feel that God alone can protect and bless him, and nothing is more natural than the language of Petition. How often is this verified by the fact that wicked men, and even professed infidels and atheists, call upon God for help when sudden- ly pressed by danger or distress ! Nor is this all. Provision is made in man's nature for the exercise also of that form of petition which consists in Intercession for others. A social being, loving and being THE DOCTRINE OF PRAYER. 1 5 loved — feeling an interest therefore in others' welfare, how natural it is for him who has obtained audience in his own behalf to inter- cede for needed blessing upon those he loves. Natural Religion teaches unequivocally the duty of prayer ; and nothing is needed for its due exercise but a spirit of piety. But Revelation sets up this doctrine with a clearness of statement, a fulness of detail, and an affluence of illustration, that leave nothing more to be desired by the candid in- quirer. It not only authorizes and commands prayer, but, by formal precept and varied ex- amples of acceptable prayer, teaches how the duty is to be performed. It asserts not only that men w^/^ pray but that they imist^ do so, in order to please God — indeed, it is by this exercise that the two great classes — God's friends and his enemies — are sometimes dis- tinguished. Of the former individually it is >Ph. 4:6. ' Mat. 7: 7. Is. 55 ; 6. Lu. 18 : i and 21 : 36. i Thes. 5: 17. 1 6 THE DOCTRINE OF PRAYER. said, " Behold he prayeth " i— of the latter, " Who call not upon the Lord ; " ^ and they are represented as saying, ** What is the Almighty that we should serve him ? and what profit should we have, if we pray unto him?"3 Salvation, as well under the ^Old Testament as under the New,^ is expressed in epitome, " Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved." God not only invites and encourages men to pray in such language as this, " Be care- ful for nothing ; but in every thing by prayer and supplication with thanksgiving let your requests be made known unto God," but he pledges himself to cooperate with them. He promises that he will give them the Holy Spirit to teach them to pray ; ^ and declares that he is nigh to all that call upon him/ and 'Ac. 9: II. 2 Ps. 14: 4& 53: 4. 8 Job 21: 15. * Joel. 2 : 32. ^ Rom. 10 : 13. * Zech. 12 : 10. Rom. 8 : 15, 26, Gal. 4 : 6. Lu. 11 : 13. ' Ps. 145 : 18. THE DOCTRINE OF PRAYER. 1 7 » a rewarder of all them that diligently seek him.^ Do earthly parents know how to give crood work,) which is properly rendered inwrought. " The prayer of a righteous man inwrought [by the Holy Spirit] availeth much." Other passages also tend to the same conclusion— as, " praying in the Holy Ghost ; "^ "praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit." 3 * Bloomfield in loc. * Ja. 5 : 16. ^ Jude 20. ' Ep. 6 : 18. AS RELATED TO PROVIDENCE. 5/ 4th. An argument corroborative of the proposition is found also in the fact that sin- cere and earnest petitions may be presented and yet fail to become prevailing prayer. Impelled not by God's Spirit but by personal tribulations and disquietudes, or by a strong desire for some coveted earthly good — sym- pathizing with others in their dangers or necessities, we may with much emotion, and with great importunity, besiege a throne of grace unavailingly. How often have chris- tians entreated earnestly for the removal of some affliction, or agonized in prayer for the delivery of loved ones from impending death, without obtaining the favor sought! These desires, natural and commendable, are some- times stimulated and seconded by the Holy Spirit. In such cases, the petitions are pre- sented not only with importunity and emotion, but with a strong confidence also that God would hear. Many a time has the christian come from his closet with a firm conviction 58 AS RELATED TO PROVIDENCE. that God would restore to health one whose case had been considered hopeless by his physician. ' How often too, alas, has he with sinking heart made agonizing supplications of this kind, feeling all the time that his prayer was not obtaining audience with God ! The scriptures furnish some striking examples of this kind : Paul, without success, *^ besought the Lord thrice " that the " thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan," " might depart from " him ; ^ Moses, addressing Israel, tes- tified, *' And I besought the Lord at that time, saying, O Lord God, ... I {bray thee, let me go over, and see the good land that is beyond Jordan, that goodly mountain, and Lebanon. But the Lord . . . would not hear me ; and the Lord said unto me, Let it suffice thee ; speak no more unto me of this matter; "2 and in Gethsemane the Saviour prayed for the third time in substance, '* O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup * 2 Cor. 12 : 8. ' Duet. 3 : 23-26. AS RELATED TO PROVIDENXE. 59 pass from me : nevertheless not as I will but as thou wilt." Nor are petitions of this char- acter sinful if made conditioned on God's will ; nor are they altogether in vain. If the spe- cific favor sought for is denied, God will make evident to the consciousness of the petitioner as he did to that of Paul that His grace will be sufficient for him ; ^ wdll elevate him as He did Moses to some Pisgah's ^top ; and will make him partake in some degree of the profound submission and resignation of the Saviour, and say with Him, " O my Father, if this cup may not pass away from me, except I drink it, thy will be done." But prevailing prayer — that which secures specifically and literally the blessing sought, is that which is indited by the Holy Spirit. It will be seen that the doctrine of prayer does not conflict with that of providence. It does not virtually dethrone God and enthrone His people instead ; nor does it suggest the * 2 Cor. 12:9. a Deut. 3 : 27. 6o AS RELATED TO PROVIDENCE. idea of inextricable confusion in the admin- istration of providence ; for christians never put up prevaiHng prayer — as in other things, so also in matters pertaining to the adminis- tration of Providence — excepting as they are impressed and instigated by the Holy Spirit. Question, But it may be asked, why all this formality ? Events of providence depend upon God's purpose and His almighty power; and no efficiency can be communicated to Hi'm by the intervention of poor finite men. Why then does He ever put the desire for the providential event first into His people's minds, and then virtually delay the execution of His plan until they express that desire to Him in the form of prayer? Because he would elevate them into partnership with Himself in the administration of Providence also. In the Kingdom of Grace, He needs not the cooperation and assistance of His feeble creatures. In all His operations for the salvation of men, He could employ only AS RELATED TO PROVIDEN'CE. 6 1 heavenly agencies ; or without instrumen- tahty, could speak the \yord, or even enter- tain the volition only, and sinners could be instantly sanctified. But He chooses to employ human instrumentality rather. It pleases God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.^ It is His will that faith should come by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.'-^ Consequently, no inhabit- ant of heaven has the prerogative to declare to sinners the glad tidings of salvation. While on earth, the Saviour, like His dis- ciples, preached, saying : '' Repent : for the kingdom of heaven is at hand."^ But when, from heaven, in light brighter than the noonday sun, He appeared to Saul near Damascus, He did not explain to him the way of salvation in answer to the question, " Lord, what wilt thou have me to do ? " but said to him, *' arise and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do." 4. * 1 Cor. i: 21. " Rom. lo: 17. ' Mat. 4 : 17. * Ac. 9 : 6. 62 AS RELATED TO PROVIDENCE. To Ananias was given the great privilege to lead the blind sinner to the cross. The Holy- Spirit enables*men to understand the gospel ; but He never preaches it to them. Hence He instructed Philip to join himself to the ■eunuch's chariot.^ When the " angel of 'God " appeared to Cornelius, though per- imitted to testify, " Thy prayers and thine .alms are come up for a memorial before «God," it was not his prerogative to preach !the gospel. A sinner saved by grace alone •was to have this great privilege. Therefore ■his instruction, ** Send men to Joppa, and call for one Simon, whose surname is Peter; ... he shall tell thee what thou oughtest to do." 2 In the Kingdom of Grace, God's ministers and people are co-workers^ and laborers together^ with Him. If then He elevates His people into partnership with Himself in the Kingdom of Grace, which is * Ac. 8: 29. 5 Ac. 10: 5, 6. * 2 Cor. 6:1. ^ I Cor. 3 : 9. AS RELATED TO PROVIDENCE. 63 the greater, why should it be thought strange that He sTiould give them a like position in the Kingdom of Providence, which is the less ? It wnll be seen then that God requires prayer not only that His people may be sanc- tified, and made active in his service, but also that they may be elevated into partnership with him in the administration of nature, providence, and grace. How greatly then does He honor the work of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, when He thus permits redeemed sinners to manifest, without impertinence or imbecility, an interest in all His administra- tions on earth ! It will be seen, again, that the ^precept, which authorizes men to put up prayers ac- cording to their own will, does not conflict with that which limits them to the petition that accords with the will of God ; for they have no prevaiHng will excepting as God works it in them. ' Vid. pp. 34, 35. CONCLUSION. I. MR. MULLER. 2. PROF. TYNDALL. Two practical applications of the doctrine will close this discussion. I. If we have given a proper exposition of Prayer as it stands related to Providence, it would not be surprising if God should, in all ages of the world, and under every dispensa- tion, raise up those who should be distin- guished from the great body of believers by the closeness of their intimacy with Him ; by the greatness of their faith ; and by the bold- ness of their petitions. Nor would it be fa- naticism should we believe and maintain that He may give to one and another of His favored servants, such impulses, impart to them such desires, and endow them with such faith, as to make them attempt without misgivings the CONCLUSION. 65 greatest enterprises for His glory, and the good of men — enterprises involving perhaps the expenditure of princely revenues, with no other resources than the answer to prayer. There is a striking example apparently of this kind, contemporary with ourselves. A man in Bristol, England, with no pecuniary resources, and not engaged in any lucrative business, undertakes to support thousands of orphans ; to build for this purpose vast and magnificent asylums ; and to carry on besides other extended benevolent operations : all involving the expenditure annually of hun- dreds of thousands of dollars, which he pro- fesses to acquire solely in answer to prayer. According to his published statement, money in a stream steady enough to prevent serious embarrassment to his vast operations, flows to him from the four quarters of the globe. Now, it is not necessary for the present writer to decide whether Mr. MuUer is a genuine man or an impostor — whether his life is really 66 CONCLUSION. one of trust or a mere pretension and a sham. It is sufficient for our present purpose to say that the doctrine of prayer as exhibited in the scriptures, prevents the modest profession of a " life of trust " from being in itself incred- ible and preposterous. But we may venture a step further. If Mr. Muller, in the many years he has been professing to live a '* life of trust," has been able to prove that these revenues he has been disbursing were contributed by others, and came to him without solicitation, his case, so far from being abnormal; furnishes not only a strong corroboration of the scriptural theory of prayer, but a striking example illustrating it. No one in his senses, and In good faith, would have attempted, without personal re- sources, such great things as he has, unless God had kindled the desire, given the im- pulse, and imparted the faith : and no one, without divine impulsion and cooperation, could have conducted such enterprises for CONCLUSION. dj twenty years without failure, if he was candid ; or disgraceful exposure, if he was an impostor. To the great body of his people, God gives impulse and faith in prayer adequate to meet all the exigencies and duties and relations of life; and requires them to be "not slothful in business, fervent in spirit, serving the ^ Lord." But one and another he may endow with such faith as to make them undertake the most extraordinary enterprises with no resources excepting those obtained in answer to prayer. Such seems to be Mr. Muller. 2. If the doctrine has been properly set up, it will be seen how illogical is Prof. Tyn- dall's famous prayer test. Doubting the efficacy of prayer, or perhaps with the design to expose its pretensions, he proposes that a large number of prayers should be offered up daily for a specified term, for the recovery of certain inmates of a London hospital, while the remainder of the patients should be ' Rom. 12 : II. 68 CONCLUSION. treated medicinally alone. According to his proposition, the one company is to rely exclusively upon prayer; the other alone upon medicine. And his question is, which would be most likely to succeed in healing the sick, christians with their faith and prayers, or physicians with their skill and medicines ? Now, it will be seen that this proposition is based upon an entire miscon- ception of the doctrine of prayer. The bible represents that christians pray because the Holy Spirit puts it into their hearts to do so : the test proposes that they should pray because Dr. Tyndall suggests it to them. The bible teaches that effectual prayer for others is impelled by a benevolent and disinterested desire for their good : the test proposes that it should be undertaken in a spirit of antagonism — to join issue with Dr. Tyndall. The bible exhibits a praying man as approaching the throne of grace with humility, and self-abasement : the test pro- CONCLUSION. 69 poses that he should step forth as a cham- pion, vaunting his own importance and efficiency. The bible requires one who would pray to come with faith, nothing doubting : the test requires that he should come, in behalf of Dr. Tyndall, to put God to the test, thus virtually justifying him in withholding confidence until God had satisfactorily passed the test. Finally, the bible requires us to pray impelled by a desire for God's glory: by the test we are urged to do so to convince Dr. Tyndall ; or, if he is uncandid, to expose and put him to confusion. True, God could appoint some modern Elijah to meet this champion of skepticism on the terms he proposes, as He did the ancient one to confront the prophets of ^ Baal; but what important end would be gained by it ? A test of the kind, accepted and success- fully sustained, is not needed to show that God hears the prayer of faith. There is ' I Ki: 18, 19, etc. 70 CONCLUSION. already on record, in God's completed revela- tion, evidence enough to show that the sick have been healed time and again in answer to prayer ; and an additional fact of this kind will not strengthen the proof. With the bible in their hands, the people do not need the successful test to convince them of the doctrine ; and Doctor Tyndall, unless God changes his heart, could easily persuade him- self, in that case, that the recovery of the sick in connection with prayer was brought about by collusion ; or that it was a re- markable coincidence, unaccountable on any known principles. He could explain it away as readily as he disposes of such cases as Mr. Muller ; and all too with a conviction that he was acting in perfect candor, and on scientific principles. Herod had heard many things of Jesus, and had for a long time desired to see Him ; and when He was sent to him by Pilate, he was glad, and hoped to have seen some mira- CONCLUSION. 71 cle done by Him. ** Then he questioned with him in many words, but he answered him nothing."^ Now, as the genuineness of Christ's miracles in the past, and His power to perform them, were not invah'dated be- cause He received in silence Herod's propo- sition that He should gratify his idle curios- ity ; so, neither is God's promise that the prayer of faith shall heal the sick proved false and vain, because He does not put it into the hearts of some of His children to accept this illogical prayer test, dictated as it is by a motive worse than idle curiosity. Dr. Tyn- dall and other professed seekers after truth do not need this test to establish their faith. If he and they are candid, they will find prayer tests on record in the bible ^ more striking and convincing than the one he pro- poses : if they are not candid, they would not be persuaded though one rose from the dead. ' Lu. 23: 7, 9. ' Jud. 6: 36-40. I Ki. 18 : 19-39- 2 Ki. 20 : 8, 11.