O PRINCETON, N. J. )Xixov ayMva.) in soul for the peace and welfare of the churches at Colosse and Laodicea, his only solicitude was, that their hearts might be " knit together in love, and unto all riches of the full assurance of under- standing, to the acknowledgment of God, and of the Father, and of Christ." Faith and love form the apostolic terms of communion with the Christian Church, the means and substance of its prosperity, and the grand catholicon for all its maladies. * Eph. i. 15, 16. t 2 Thess. i. 3. 76 THE NATURE OF CHRISTIAN UNITY. 5. To constitute faith and love the principles of unity in the Christian Church is only in consonance with the Divine requirements of the moral law ; — for what is it but to exhibit religion anew under its two- fold aspect of love to God and love to man? What is it but to bring the two tables of the law from the Jewish temple into the Christian Church, that they may lean against the cross, and be sprinkled with its blood ? For it is only by believing in Christ that the soul is restored to the capacity of loving sincerely either God or man. 6. In times of persecution, faith and love were the only bonds of unity which Christians in many in- stances could retain. As the " woman fled into the wilderness," whatever of earthly ornament or human appendage had formed a part of her attire, was cast away, and she appeared only in her celestial dress, " clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars." In the fastnesses of Caledonia, Wales, and Piedmont, Chris- tianity found a retreat from her pursuers ; and as she sat, with the Bible on her knees, and her children at her feet, showed, for ages, how well the Church can subsist in the only unity which the Gospel recognises, by simply " speaking, aAjjSeuovTfj, maintaining^ or pro- fessing the truth [of the Gospel] in love." 7. And as any additions to faith and love have at times been found impracticable, so are they always unnecessary. What can bring the sinner to the foot THE NATURE OF CHRISTIAN UNITY. 77 of the cross till faith effects it ? and when faith has led him there, and induced him to clasp it, what addi- tional power can be necessary to detain him ? And when love, as the natural result of faith, and in obe- dience to Christ, has united him to the brotherhood, how supererogatory to add any thing to a principle which of itself "beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things. " To think of bringing any thing merely human to the aid of a principle so self-sufficient, and of making such supplement indispensable, seems to be as incon- sistent with reason and Scripture, as it would be to think of supplying its entire absence by the same im- potent means. IV. Having thus illustrated the scriptural nature of the unity of the Church, we find ourselves in posses- sion of the following important results. The fact that faith is an essential element of Christian union implies that the Church is a holy community ; the fact that love is equally essential necessarily makes it a visible union; while from the two causes com- bined it follows that this holy and visible union is universal. 1. The Church is "a congregation of faithful men" — a community of regenerated characters.* The faith • Ecclesiam veram intelligere non audeo, &c. " I dare not under- stand the true Church to consist but of holy and righteous men." Auy. de Bapt. 5. 27. " There are many who communicate in sacraments H 3 n 78 THE NATURE OF CHRISTIAN UNITY. " which draws them to Christ, detaches them from sin, and aUies them to holiness. This is their only glory in the eyes of Christ, and their chief distinction from the world around. The ungodly world is one vast confederation of evil, and the design of Christ in in- stituting a Church is, not merely to provide an asylum for all the spiritual excellence of earth, but chiefly to create in the midst of this awful confederation, a counteracting agency of good. The indiscriminate ad- mission into his Church, therefore, of the godly and the ungodly would be an obvious frustration of his design. And hence the numerous and various precautions which he has taken to maintain for his Church a spiritual character; proclaiming when he was about to form it, " Repent ye, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand;" inscribing this memorable sentence over the entrance of his Church, " Except a man be bom again, he cannot enter :" prescribing for it a code of discipline,* which, if faithfully administered, would have the effect of rebuking every sin the moment it appeared, and of casting from its bosom every hypo- crite and ungodly intruder, the moment his character became known :f calhng its members by names and titles which none but converted men can own :J as- signing them duties which none but spiritual men can with the Church, and yet they are not in the Church." Idem. De Unit. Eccl. c. 20. • Matt, xviii. 15—20. t 1 Cor. v. 11—13. ; Rev. ii. iii. j Rom. i. 7 ; 1 Cor. i. 2 ; Eph. i. 1 ; Col. i. 2 ; iii. 13. THE NATURE OF CHRISTIAN UNITY. 79 perform :* and conferring on them privileges which such men only can relish or desire. Accordingly, the members of the first church were those "^Aa^ believed;" and those who were subse- quently added to them were tbj o-«^oj«,ev«j, " those that were saved.'' While the exhortations of the apostles to the churches they addressed, and especially the tenour of our Lord's messages to the seven Asiatic churches, evince the Divine solicitude that such only should be admitted and retained within its pale, in order that the spiritual and distinctive character of his Church might be maintained. 2. By rendering the Church a union of affection, the institution is made visible. Love, even of an or- dinary kind, soon betrays its existence. The love of the brethren originates in a cause, and leads to re- sults, peculiar to itself. The faith which detaches the heart from the world, does not destroy the so- cial principle, but only leads it to seek gratification in another direction. The institution of the Chris- tian Church is intended to meet this want — to furnish the social principle with a sphere in which it might enjoy ample scope and activity for the production and reciprocation of good. Here, we are to look on the faults of others only to pity and pray for them ; f and to contemplate their excellences * Matt. V. 16 ; Luke Ti. 27, 28 ; 1 Thess. v. 16, 17, 18. t Hence Origen, in bis panegyric on the church at Athens, de- clares, " every division, every schism was detestable to you ; you 80 THE NATURE OF CHRISTIAN UNITY. only to admire and imitate : to lessen their cares by sympathy, and to multiply their pleasures by partici- pation ; to find and fabricate our happiness in pro- moting the happiness of others, and " so fulfil the law of Christ." Hero, whatever relates to the advance- ment of the kingdom of Christ is to unite all hearts, and to be enibarked in as a common interest, in the success of which every one is equally concerned. And by this congeniality of character, and identity of interests, the Church is to exhibit the spectacle of a vast community actuated " witli one heart and one soul." " Bi/ this" said Christ, " shall all men know that ye are my disciples ; " and b\/ this the world did distinguish them. So intense, self-denying, and ac- tive was their love, that it stood forth in contrast with the selfishness of the world, like the verdure of para- dise set in tiic desert. TcrttiUian, in his Apology, gives us the very words in which numbers admired their conduct, " See," said they, *' how they love one another, and are ready to lay down their lives for each other." • 3. And from the combined influence of this faitli and love, it follows that this holy and visible union was universal. As it did not originate in a cause peculiar to any particular portion of the Ciiristian Church. wept over the failings of your neighbours ; you thought their defects your own, and were impatient after every good work." * Vide, inquiunt, ut se diliguut ; et pro alterutro mori paraM sunt. THE NATURE OF CHRISTIAN UNITY. 81 but in one comnaon to the whole, it necessarily em- braced the entire body. " We know," says the apostle John, " that we have passed from death unto life, because we love the brethren," — we love them as brethren, on account of their spiritual relationship to Christ, their attachment to him, and the traces they exhibit of his Divine image ; and, therefore, wherever we behold a genuine Christian, we recog- nise a brother — a member of the family of Christ. And hence they exhibited a union not merely of indi- vidual Christians, but of churches. Having pro- fessed by baptism their faith in Christ, they were cordially received to the communion of the Lord's- supper ; and having joined in that feast of Christian fellowship with one church, they were deemed eligible to communion with every other church.* Tokens of Christian salutation, and offices of bro- therly love, were familiarly interchanged.f They were ready to unite in the Church on earth with all with whom they hoped to meet and mingle in the worship of the Church in heaven. Minor differences * And hence Chrysostom complains of Epiphanius, that when he came to Constantinople, " he came not into the congregation accord- ing to custom and tfie ancient manner he joined not with us, nor communicated with us in the word, and prayer, and the holy commu- nion." — Cfirys. ad Innoc. P. Ep. 122. t " Both common charity and reason require, most dear brethren, that we conceal nothing from your knowledge of those things which are done among us, that so there may be common advice," &c. — Cyp., Ep. 29. {Ad Cler. Rom.) 82 THE NATURE OF CHRISTIAN UNITY. they do not appear to have thought of; but in the exercise of that comprehensive regard which taught them to "love the brotherhood," they included in their large and complacent embrace " all who in every place called upon the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, both theirs and ours." If ever the prayer of Christ, " that they all might be one," was answered, it was then ; when, whatever the internal state of particular churches, they exhibited to the world the sublime and glorious spectacle of a universal agapa, to which every Christian brother, on presenting the tessera of discipleship, received the cordial welcome of a friend of Christ. CHAPTER III. SCHISM, THE BREACH OF THE UNION OF THE CHURCH. As the union of the Christian Church is twofold, consisting of faith in Christ and love to the brethren, it is evident that it must be capable of a twofold rup- ture. The breach of the former is heresy or apos- tacy, the violation of the latter is schism. But as apostacy, or a departure from God, necessarily in- cludes schism, or a departure from the brethren ; so schism, in its scriptural import, argues an impaired state of faith in Christ, and tends to impair it still farther. Schism, therefore, is to be regarded as the breach of the unity of the Church. But as this is an inquiry relating entirely to a scriptural question, our first concern should un- doubtedly be to ascertain " the mind of the Spirit." Let us then appeal " to the law and to the testi- mony." The term " schism," though it occurs but once* in * 1 Cor. xii. 25. 84 SCHISM, THE BREACH OF its untranslated form in our English version of the New Testament, occurs in the Greek, either as a noun or a verb, in eighteen instances. In ten of these it is applied literally to denote the violent divulsion of some material substance, such as the rending of the rocks, or of the vail at the crucifixion of Christ. In five instances the word is applied figuratively, to de- note states of mind in which difference of opinion was attended with eruptions of temper, and conse- quent altercation. In only three instances is the term applied to the Church ; and all of these are in the first Epistle to the Corinthians. Here, then, if any where, we may expect to learn the nature of schism. The first is as follows : — " Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divi- sions {(T-x^KTitoLra.) among you; but that ye be per- fectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment. For it hath been declared to me of you, my brethren that there are contentions among you. Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul, and I of Apollos, and I of Cephas, and I of Christ."* That the unanimity which the apostle enjoins, is not a mere identity of opinion on matters of faith is evident, for to such no allusion is made, nor does it appear that * 1 Cor. i. 10—13. THE UNION OF THE CHURCH. 83 on such any difference of opinion existed.* The Corinthians would have instantly inferred, even without any explanation, that the subject on which the apostle would have them to be one, was that on which, at the time, they were many. But by adverting expressly to the nature of their " conten- tions," he places the question beyond a doubt. Four parties, at least, existed in this Christian church. And having divided, contentions arose respecting the superiority of the leaders whose names they had adopted, and the way in which they endeavoured to strengthen their several fi^ctions. Adverting to the subject of their disputes again in the third chapter, the apostle speaks of their (S(p(^oo-Tatr»«() factions. What then was the nature of the "schisms" which the apostle here sought to extinguish ? A factious pre- ference of the ministers by whom they had believed, to the loss of that brotherly love which they owed to each other. An exclusive regard for the members of a party, when they ought to have been affectionately embracing the whole Church. And hence his aim is to remove their party-regards from himself, and Apollos, and * " Theophylact. — ' Since mauy may be united in matters of intel- lect, and yet differ in sentiment ; for when we believe the same things, but yet are not knit together in charity, we hold the same notions, but differ in sentiment: — this being the case, the apostle, by adding to the words rw avru) voi, the words, rr/ avri] yvw/ijj, ex- presses a wish that they might differ neither on points of faith, nor onmatteisof sentiment.' — See also Chrysostom." — Professor Bill- roth in loco. 86 SCHISM, THE BREACH OF Cephas, and to centre them on Christ alone, as the only way of restoring their love to each other. He reminds them in the verse immediately preceding, that they have been "called into the fellowship of Jesus Christ our Lord he tenderly entreats them all as "brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ;" and, pointing them to the cross, touchinglv i-eminds them that Christ alone has poured out for them his blood. Thus would he hush their alterca- tions, and heal their divisions, by calling them around the cross, there to feel that they are all one in Christ. The second passage is as follows : — " Now, in this that I declare unto you, I praise you not, that ve come together not for the better, but for the worse. For, first of all, when ye come toge- ther in the church, I hear that there be divi- sions ((Tj^io-ju-aTa) among you ; and I partly believe it ... . When ye come together, therefore, into one place, this is not to eat the Lord s-supper. For in eating every one taketh before other his own supper : and one is hungry, and another is drunken. What I have ye not houses to eat and to drink in ? or despise ye the Church of God, and shame them that have not ? ^ATiat shall I say to you ? shall I praise you in this? I praise you not."* Three things are here * 1 Cor. xi. 17 — 22. " The expression KvpiaKov cu—vov compre- hecds here, as L'steri has correctly remarked, the entire observance, as well of the Lord's-supper, properly so called, as of the Agapse, which were commonly associated with it." — Billroth, "routov THE UNION OF THE CHURCH. 87 distinctly specified deserving our particular attention : — first, the general charge alleged against the church at Corinth — " I hear there be schisms among you ; and I partly believe it." Second, the serious mistake in which these schisms had originated, or by which they had been fostered — " When ye come together into one place, this is not to eat the Lord's-supper " — to partake of that is more than simply eating, as you seem to suppose, in one place, in mere local union. Third, the nature of the schisms which ensued — " for in eating every one taketh before other his own sup- per: and one is hungry, and another is drunken." As they assembled in one place, and as one church, love would have brought them together united in spirit and purpose ; but they came regardless of each other's feelings and circumstances — and this was schism. Affection would have taught them to wait the arrival of their fellow-members; but they selfishly began without delay — and this ivas schism, dnirvoi' denotes the supper which each one had brought as his own contribution to the common meal, IIpoX., antecapit, has reference to the eagerness ■m\h which each one (of the richer sort, we may pre- sume) snatched up the food he had brought, and filled himself there- with, before the poorer class could well touch it ; which would cause them (who had brought little or nothing with them) to fare very scantily. And as this (which is to be understood of the agapa pre- ceding the Lord's-supper) was not an ordinary meal, it was a viola- tion o{ propriety as well as of Christian charity so to act; for though each brought his own supper, yet when it had been thrown into the common stock, it ceased to be his own. Thus the plenty of some shamed the wants of others ; which occasioned heart-burnings, and so defeated the very end of the solemnity." — Bloomfield. 88 SCHISM, THE BREACH OF Sympathy would have taught them to unite their means in a common Agapa, or feast of love; but those who had abundance not only indulged to ex- cess, they shamefully forgot their poorer brethren who had nothing, and thus made them feel the smart of their poverty — and this was schism. The state of things which is here described, then, is charac- terised hi/ the absence of Christian sympathy and love, and this the apostle condemns as a state of schism. In the third and last passage in which the word schism occurs, the object of the apostle appears to be to sum up and enforce all that he had previously written on its nature and evils. " God hath tem- pered the body together, having given more abun- dant honour to that part which lacked; that there should be no schism in the body; but that the members should have the same care one for another. And whether one member suffer, all the members suffer with it ; or one member he honoured, all the members rejoice with it."* In the beautiful apologue of which this passage is the conclusion, the corporeal system is contemplated as a whole composed of many parts; each of these parts is supposed to be endowed with individual life and separate intelligence ; but it is implied that all of them are intended to be united, by a sense of dependence and a sentiment of affection, common to the whole ; and it is the absence of this sympathetic bond which is represented as the " schism t * 1 Cor. xii. 24—26. THE UNION OF THE CHURCH. 89 in the body." The application is obvious and inevit- able. The Christian Church — composed of many members — is the body of Christ ; each of these mem- bers, though possessing a distinct and separate con- sciousness, is vitally related to the whole; and, in order to the completeness and well-being of the whole, it is intended that " the members should have the same care one for another. And whether one member suffer all the members suffer with it, or one member be honoured, all the members rejoice with it." Now, if such be the united action and the reciprocal sympathy of the members of the Christian Church, in the absence of schism — the icant, or the violation, of that mutual care and sympathy is the evil thing which the apostle denominates schism. In further corroboration of this position, we might advert, were it necessary, to the inimitable eulogy on Christian charity which immediately follows in the thirteenth chapter. Having described the malady with which the Corinthian church was afflicted, he here proceeds to prescribe for it. For a church in the last stage of schism, love is the only and the infallible remedy. And as the nature of a disease may be inferred from the character of the remedy, schism must be regarded as directly opposed to the love of the brethren. Having now considered the only places in Scrip- ture in which the term schism is employed in reference to the Church, we find ourselves brought to the foUow- i3 90 SCHISM, THE BREACH OF ing general conclusion — a conclusion replete with in- terest and important instruction for every Christian and Christian church in Christendom — that an exclu- sive, factious, and uncharitable spirit, wherever, and in combination with whatever, it may exist, is essential schism. The writer is aware, that as the term is ecclesiastically employed in Scripture in reference to the state of things, in a particular church alone, it has been contended that it cannot be strictly applied to the act of separation from a church, or to the state of things existing between churches already distinct. But, first, as the term is employed in Scripture, in its literal signification, to denote not merely a division hi a thing, but also a total separation of its parts :* secondly, as separation fi'om a church, when occasioned by schism in it, is but the same principle extended in its application, and producing its appro- priate effects : and, thirdly, as even the writers in question consent on this latter account to carry the term from strifes and factions in a church to their natural results in actual and visible separation, we feel ourselves warranted in laying it down as an incontrovertible position, that an exclusive, factious, and uncharitable spirit, wherever it exists, is essential * Thrice in relation to the veil of the temple, Matt, xxvii. 51, "the veil of the temple was rent in twain;" taxioQi) tis ovo utto avu}Otv twQ KUTiu. Mark xv. 38. idem. Luke xxiii. 45., fiiaov, " in the midst." And once in relation to the garment of Jesus, John six. 24, " they said, Let us not rend it," (/iii (tyictw/^si',) where the rending avoided was a division into four distinct parts. THE UNION OF THE CHURCH. 91 schism. Indeed, if schism consist, as we have seen, in the violation of that brotherly love which should unite all Christians in one, this is the only conclu- sion at which we can arrive. Now from this general proposition it follows, first, that the schismatic principle may exist in only one member of a Christian church. It is, indeed, com- monly found to distinguish a faction ; but this is simply because it does not begin to attract notice until it has enlisted a party, and has made itself heard in its party clamours, and felt in its party measures. But how many of the divisions which have rent the Christian Church can be traced up to the unhallowed temper or overbearing conduct of a single member ! How probable is it that the schisms in the church at Corinth thus originated ; for even when the apostle addressed it, his admonition to " mark them that cause offences," indicated that the chief agents of the evil were a few well-known indi- viduals. And how directly should this reflection lead the active and influential Christian to examine whether or not his activity tends to unite or to separate. He may not be one of a party, he may be a party himself. Second : a church may be professedly and exter- nally united, and yet it may be filled with schism. The Christians at Corinth assembled together in one place— believed substantially the same doctrines — and, to all outward appearance, maintained the unity 8 92 SCHISM, THE BREACH OF of a church, and yet, at that very time, they were completely pervaded with a spirit of schism. " Every one of you saith," writes the apostle, " I am of Paul," &c. ; the disease was epidemic ; and not one had en- tirely escaped the infection. Third : a church may be not only externally one, but really one in doctrine and discipline, and yet be schismatic. The schism in the church at Corinth did not consist in the separation and departure of any of its members to form a distinct society; for the very time when their schisms were most apparent was when they had " come together into one place to eat the Lord's-supper." Nor did their schisms consist in offering resistance to any of the officers or authorities divinely appointed in the church ; on the contrary, they were disposed rather to multiply authorities in the persons of Paul, ApoUos, and Cephas ; and to be proud of their various endowments, and of the dis- tinct offices to which they pointed. Nor did their schisms consist in any departures from the faith, or in any changes of the constitution of the Christian Church; for however erroneous the view they enter- tained of what was necessary to the right celebration of the Lord's-supper, it was not that erroneous view itself which the apostle denominated schism, but its practical results. The sin consisted in those unchris- tian tempers, acrimonious disputes, and factious com- binations, which disturbed the peace, and destroyed the sympathetic unity of the Church. THE UNION OF THE CHURCH. Fourth: schism may exist in the same church, or among the same Christians, in very dilFerent degrees. This is especially the case when a rupture in a church is made visible and permanent by actual de- parture and separate communion from it. " If the Corinthians are charged with schism, on account of that spirit of contention, and that alienation of their affections from each other, which merely tended to an open rupture, how much more would they have in- curred that censure had they actually proceeded to that extremity ? Though it may be applied to such a state of contention as consists with the preservation of external union, it is most eminently applicable to a society whose bond of union is dissolved, and where one part rejects the other from its fellowship. If there is any meaning in terms, this is schism in its highest sense."* Fifth : in the event of a separation, the question as to whether the guilt of schism attaches to the party leaving, or to the party left, is of course to be decided only by the spirit ^and conduct of the respective par- ties.f The fact of their separation merely determines the relative position in which they are now standing to each other; the guilt of that fact is to be looked * Robert Hall, on Christian, in opposition to Party Communion, t When an overflowing Christian Society colonises, or erects a second place, by common consent, for the reception and accom- modation of its surplus members, this is not separation, but diffusion — both are still one in love and in Christ. 94 SCHISM, THE BREACH OF for in the unscriptural causes which have produced the division and placed them in that position ; and in whichever party we find these causes, there we have detected, and are warranted to charge, the sin of schism. Whence it follows, 1, That where persons have been separated and cut off from a church, the charge of schism may lie, not against the church which has ex- communicated them, but against themselves. The church may have cut them off as the only method of saving itself from being overrun and destroyed by the spirit of schism; just as the amputation of a limb may be the only method of preventing the entire dis- solution of the natural body. In casting them out of its bosom, the church may be only exercising that power of Christian discipline with which it is in- trusted by its Divine Head for the preservation of its purity and peace ; and for the actual employment of which, when necessary, he holds it responsible. And when performing their excision, so far from exhibiting a want of charity, it may feel as if it were cutting off a right hand, or plucking out a right eye ; and may do it " even weeping." Or, 2, Where separation from a church has taken place, the charge of schism may lie, not against the persons who secede, but against the church whose communion they have left. That circumstances may arise, not only justifying secession, but making it a sacred duty, is evident from such commands of Scrip- THE UNION OF THE CHURCH. 95 ture as the following : — " If any one teach hetero- doxies from such withdraw thyself."* " With- draw yourselves from every brother that walketh dis- orderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us."f " Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins.":f Obedience to the will of Christ, then, may render separation from a church an imperative obligation. For instance, when the church at Pergamos had received the apocalyptic warning to repent on peril of Divine displeasure, had fifty of its members trembled and determined, in the strength of God, to obey — and had they respectfully applied to the great body of that church, representing their strong desire to reifiain in communion with it, and their consequent anxiety to see it cleansed from " the doctrine of Balaam," and from " the doctrine of the Nicolaitanes," in order that they might be able consci- entiously to continue in its bosom — and had the great majority of that church, not only refused to listen both to the voice of the Divine warning and of the Christian remonstrance and entreaty, but had it even proceeded to draw up a creed or prescript in which the very doctrines objected to (those of Balaam and Nicolaitanes) were embodied, stamped with assumed infallibility, and made necessaiy articles of faith — and had the fifty then mournfully and peaceably with- drawn from a church which had first misled and after- wards oppressed them — which of the two parties would * 1 Tim. vi. 3—5. f 2 Thess. iii. 6. I Rev. xviii. 4. 96 SCHISM, THE BREACH OF have been chargeable with the guilt of schism ? To wait for a reply is unnecessary. Accordingly, in meeting the charge of schism, which the church of Rome brings against that of England, the ablest advocates of the latter occupy precisely this ground. " For when," says the ever- memorable Hales, " either false or uncertain conclu- sions are obtruded for truth, and acts, either unlawful or ministering just scruple, are required of us to be performed, in these cases, consent were conspiracy, and open contestation is not faction or schism, but due Christian animosity." " For where cause of schism is necessary, there, not he that separates, but he that is the cause of separation, is the schismatic."* The learned Barrow, in his " Treatise of the Pope's Supremacy," has a chapter f enumerating the reasons which justify separation from the church of Rome. He shows, that to withdraw from communion with churches " in case of their maintaining errors, or of their disorderly behaviour, is a practice approved of by Great and General Synods, as also by divers popes;" and quotes with approbation the language of St. Jerome, retorting on John, Bishop of Jerusalem, his ecclesiastical superior, the charge of schism — " Who makes a schism in the church ? we, whose whole house in Bethlehem communicate with the church: or thou, who either believest aright, and proudly concealest the truth, or art of a wrong belief, * Tract concerning Schism, &c. t Chap. vii. THE UNION OF THE CHURCH. 97 and really makest a breach in the Church? Art thou alone the Church ? and is he who ofFendeth thee excluded from Christ?" "Men would do well to consider," says Bishop Taylor in his Liberty of Prophesying,* " whether or no such proceedings do not derive the guilt of schism upon them who least think it ; and whether of the two is the schismatic, he that makes unnecessary and (supposing the state of things) inconvenient impositions, or he that disobeys them because he cannot, without doing violence to his conscience, believe them : he that parts com- munion because without sin he could not entertain it, or they that have made it necessary for him to separate by requiring such conditions which to man are simply necessary, and to his particular are either sinful or impossible." And, saith Chillingworth, in addressing the Romanists, " The Protestants were not fugitivi but fugati they were, by you neces- sitated and constrained to separate, because you will not suffer them to do well with you, unless they would do ill with you." They cannot communicate with you, " not so much because you maintain errors and corruptions, but because you impose them, and have so ordered your communion, that either we must communicate with you in these things, or nothing." They could not profess what they believed to be false, nor comply with what they considered superstitious ; this would have been a violation of conscience, and * Section xxii. K 98 SCHISM, THE BREACH OF treason against its Lord ; their withdrawment, there- fore, was an act of self-preservation, rendered una- voidable by the highest necessity. Consequently, the blame of separation attached, not to them, but to those whose spirit of imposition had made so painful a measure necessary. This is the great principle on which the conduct of the Reformers in seceding from the Romish church admits of the amplest vindication. Or, 3, The separatists may not only be free from the charge of schism, but they may have separated chiefly to avoid schism. The great sect of the Dona- tists maintained that their own church was the only true, uncorrupted, universal church — separated them- selves from the communion of all other parts of the Church — required of a candidate, as a necessary con- dition of communion, that he should renounce com- munion with all other churches — pronounced the administration of the ordinance of the Lord's-supper, out of their own communion, null and void — and re-baptised those who joined them from other churches, and re-ordained their ministers ; — " a con- dition," says Chillingworth, "both unnecessary and unlawful to be required, and therefore the exacting of it was directly opposite to the Church's Catholicism ; in the very same nature with their errors who required circumcision .... as necessary to salvation. For who- soever requires harder or heavier conditions of men than God requires of them, he it is that is properly an enemy of the Church's universality, by hindering THE UNION OF THE CHURCH. 99 either men or countries from joining themselves to it. And seeing the present church of Rome persuades men they were as good not to be Christians, as not to be Roman Catholics ; believe nothing at all, as not to believe all she im- poses on them ; be absolutely out of the Church's communion, as be out of her communion, or be in any other: whether she be not guilty of the same crime with the Donatists, and those zealots of the Mosaical law, I leave it to the judgment of those who understand reason." Now, it is easy to conceive of a member or members separating from an exclusive and intolerant community, like that of the Donatists, not only with- out justly incurring the charge of schism, but ex- pressly to avoid it. " We must be separatists," they might have said, " because we cannot be sectarian. Were we schismatical we would remain Donatists, but as we are catholic we leave them. We love the Church of Christ so much, that we cannot continue in the church of Donatus. We think so much of union, that we are content to sacrifice uniformity in subordinate matters for the sake of obtaining it." By thus emerging from their sectarian enclosure, would they not have been leaving schism behind them? And by thus taking the whole Church to their heart, would they not have been setting a noble example of universal love, and hastening the day when, in answer to the prayer of Christ for his followers, they all shall be one ? 100 SCHISM, THE BREACH OF Or, 4, Although the first separatists from a church may have been schismatical, those who continue the separation may not be so. " They who alter, with- out necessary cause, the present government of any state, civil or ecclesiastical, do commit a great fault ; yet they may be innocent who continue this alteration when continuance of time hath once settled it." * Tliey may perpetuate it conscientiously and amicably, so as to endear themselves to the commu- nity left, and to identify themselves with the universal Church. Whence it follows, as well as from the general pro- position which has led to these inferences, that the removal of denominational distinctions, or the absorp- tion of all sects by one, is by no means necessary to extinguish schism. " We see that in many things, and they of great concernment, men allow to themselves and to each other a liberty of disagreeing, and no hurt neither. And certainly if diversity of opinions were of itself the cause of mischiefs, it would be so ever, that is, regularly and universally, (but that we see it is not :) for there are disputes in Christendom concerning matters of greater concernment than most of those opinions that distinguish sects and make fac- tions; and yet because men are permitted to differ in those great matters, such evils are not conse- quent to such differences as are to the uncharitable managing of smaller and more inconsiderable ques- * Chillingworth, chap. v. 4. THE UNION OF THE CHURCH. 101 tions It is not the differing of opinions that is the cause of the present ruptures, but want of charity; it is not the variety of understandings, but the disunion of wills and affections ; it is not the several principles, but the several ends, that cause our miseries. Our opinions commence and are up- held according as our turns are served and our inte- rests are preserved, and there is no cure for us but piety and charity."* Let Judah cease to vex Ephraim, and Ephraim cease to envy Judah ; they might still exist distinct as tribes, for they would be one as bre- thren. Calvinist and Arminian, Presbyterian and Methodist, Episcopalian, Baptist, and Independent, are specific names, innocent in themselves ; only let love subordinate them to the generic name of Chris- tian, and it will be seen that variety of sect is per- fectly compatible with the unity of the Church. * Taylor's Liberty of Prophesying. K 3 CHAPTER IV. CAUSES OF SCHISM ; ESPECIALLY THOSE WHICH EXISTED FROM APOSTOLIC TIMES TO THE PERIOD OF THE REFORM- ATION. In attempting to investigate the causes of schism, we have to turn to those dark pages of ecclesiastical history from which the sceptic derives his strongest objection to Christianity, and which contain, accord- ing to his representations, the substance of its annals. Having gratuitously asserted, and ostentatiously dis- played, the mild and tolerant nature of ancient poly- theism, he places it in invidious contrast with the contentions and persecutions which from age to age have stained the Christian name ; and then proclaims, as by sound of trumpet, the superior spirit of the former, and denounces the latter as a convicted cri- minal and a curse. Now, as this is the chief, if not the only point of superiority to the Gospel which the advocates of ancient heathenism claim for it — as the impression of its truth, by incessant repetition is so CAUSES OF SCHISM. 103 general that even a Bacon* is found unguardedly stating, that " the quarrels and divisions about reli- gion were evils unknown to the heathen" — and as the supposed tendency of the Gospel to produce dis- sensions has created, perhaps, stronger prejudices against it than all the other cavils of infidelity com- bined, it seems not only proper but necessary that a chapter which might otherwise tend to nourish this prejudice, should be introduced by a few warning and corrective remarks. The following series of hints might easily be illus- trated from history, and enlarged to any extent. 1. Even allowing that the theory of the tolerant spirit of ancient heathenism had ever been carried into practice, it could not have been accounted a virtue. For if polytheism allowed the unlimited reception of new divinities, the admission of an addi- tional god to the Olympian conclave, was not the tolerance of a new religion, but only a step towards the completion of that which already existed. Nor was there any more ground for praise in such admis- sion, than there is in the church of Rome on the canonisation of a saint, or in the act of an officer who registers a baptism or a birth. •2. But the plausible theory of the tolerant spirit of Paganism is never known to have been realised in practice. The Athenians allowed no altera- tion whatever in the religion of their ancestors; * Essay on Unity of Religion. 104 CAUSES OF SCHISM. and the lives of -^schylus, Anaxagoras, Diagoras, Protagoras, Prodicus, Socrates, and Alcibiades, de- cided that innovation in religion was death. The holy or sacred wars among the Grecian states ; the sanguinary contests between the respective votaries of the different gods of Egypt;* and the cruel extermination of the disciples of every other religion except that of Zoroaster, in Persia, con- spire to prove that bigotry is peculiar to no clime, but is indigenous to our nature. As to the vaunted toleration of the Roman government, we learn from Livy,f that about 430 years before Christ, orders were given to the iEdiles to see that "none except Roman gods were worshipped, nor in any other than the established forms." Mecaenas earnestly ex- horted Augustus to " hate and punish" all foreign religions, and to compel all men to conform to the national worship : and Augustus and his successors literally followed his counsel. Tiberius prohibited the Egyptian worship; banished the Jews from Rome ; and restrained the worship of the Druids in Gaul. Domitian and Vespasian banished the phi- losophers from Rome, some of whom were confined in the islands, and others put to death. From all of which it would appear that intolerance was an original law of Rome — that this law was never re- • Juvenal, Sat. xv. t B. iv. c. 30. See also i. xxxix. c. xvi. Cicero de Legibm c. ii. 8. Valerius Maximus b. i. c. 3. Dio Cassius, p. 490 — 2. CAUSES OF SCHISM. 105 pealed — and that, from time to time, it was let loose on the professors of other religions with terrible effect. While the history of France during the revolution proclaims, that hot as were the fires of persecution which Polytheism often kindled, Atheism has a furnace capable of being " heated seven times hot- ter" — that intolerance is inherent in our fallen nature. 3. Not only did persecution exist prior to the intro- duction of Christianity, it employed its utmost power for the extinction of the Gospel. " The dragon stood ... to devour the child as soon as it was born." The infant Church was cradled in suffering. Its champions were covered with the scars of conflict. Its members dated from their persecutions. All the instruments of suffering were prepared — all the ap- paratus of torture and death were brought out and arrayed in its path to arrest its progress. Philosophy, descending from that contempt with which she had professed to view the early steps of the Gospel, joined hands with the pagan priesthood, and conferred on the Church the unintentional honour of distinguishing it from all other " superstitions" by the superior activity of its deadly hate. Armed with the sword of the civil power, and mai'ching under its banners, 300 years were spent in labouring to crush the Christian Church. Yet, during all these ages of persecution, it does not appear that the emperors had occasion to enact any new penal laws. So amply was the 106 CAUSES OF SCHISM. ancient armoury of the Roman code stored with the weapons of persecution, that they had only to select and wield them at pleasure. Nor should it be forgotten that the bad pre-eminence of raising per- secution from a law to a science, was reserved for a pagan. Julian it was who first taught the theory of persecution, and made it a branch of practical philo- sophy. 4. If Christianity has practised persecution, she learned the dreadful art from her own personal suffer- ings at the hands of her pagan tormentors. Long instructed in the maxims of intolerance, and accus- tomed to the spectacle of persecution, it was hardly possible that Christians should suddenly forget the lessons of their pagan oppressors; or support with perfect equanimity the transition they experienced from being the ofFscouring of all things to become the lords of the world. But, to the honour of the Chris- tian name be it remembered, that universal toleration was first taught, even at the time of that transition, and taught by one professedly Christian. Constan- tine, in his Edict of Milan — whatever his motives, and however inconsistent his subsequent conduct — proclaimed universal toleration ; protecting all, pagan as well as Christian, worship ; " that they who erred might enjoy the blessing of peace and quietness equally with the faithful."* 5. But the greatest waste of human life has been * Apud. Euseb. de Vita Constant. CAUSES OF SCHISM. 107 occasioned, not by religion, true or false, but by causes purely political. The wars of political society, says Burke, " have slaughtered upwards of seventy times the number of souls this day on the globe." So that if the quarrels and bloodshed occasioned by a nominal Christianity is to be employed as an argument against the Gospel, the greater evils arising from civil society, supply a still stronger argument for returning to a state of savage nature.* 6. Many of the contentions, wars, and massacres, professedly religious, have, in their origin, been really and simply political. Thus the Crusades themselves, or, as they were called, to answer a purpose, the Holy Wars, unquestionably originated not in any reverence for the land they wasted, but in the rapa- city and ambition of two of the most turbulent popes who ever filled the pontifical throne. And in the same way, the wars of the League, commonly as^ cribed to a religious origin, took their rise in the per- sonal resentments and ambitious projects of the leaders of factions, and the princes of the blood. Po- litical causes having drawn the sword, a corrupt reli- gion was only employed to poison its edge, that the wound inflicted might be the more difficult to heal. 7. All those persecutions and wars which have pro- fessedly originated in religious motives, have been undertaken in direct opposition to the spirit of the * See that admirable piece of irony by Burlte, " A Vindication of Natural Society." 108 CAUSES OF SCHISM. Gospel, and are denounced by it. Popery may have been to blame — human nature may have been to blame — (for every man has more or less of the priest in his heart, as far as that term is associated with the idea of bigotr)-,) but the Gospel never. So far from this, it proclaims "peace on earth and good-will to- wards men." To every individual who would draw a material sword in its defence, its language is, " Put up thy sword again into its place." And if the sword be not quickly sheathed, it flies from the place as from an uncongenial element : so that in every scene of intolerance, the presence of the Gospel has always been felt like a burden and a restraint ; nor was it till men had succeeded in forgetting or defying it, that persecution felt itself at full liberty to kindle its fires, and indulge its hate. And often, alas, at such times, the Bible itself has been the first martyr cast into the flames. 8. In proportion as the Gospel triumphs, persecu- tions cease, and a spirit of forbearance and charity succeeds. To take the character of Christianity from its corrupted form in the middle ages, is as inconsist- ent as to judge of the mountain stream of the Jordan from an analysis of the bituminous waters of the Dead Sea in which they are lost. To judge of them fairly, they should be traced to their fountain, and examined in their purity. If ever benevolence was made visible in human form, it was in the person of the Divine Founder of Christianity. And the cha- CAUSES OF SCHISM. 109 racter of Christ, is the character of his dispensation. Within the wide limits of his dominions he allows no blood to be seen, but that of his own atoning sacrifice — no sword to be wielded, but that weapon of ethereal temper, the sword of the Spirit, whose strokes alight only on the conscience, and whose edge is anointed with a balm to heal every wound it may inflict. If one of his professed subjects offend, the loyal and obedient are only empowered to rebuke the offender, and to refuse him their society. Accordingly, ex- communication was the earliest, and for ages the only, weapon the Church employed. " We ought," says Chrysostom, * "to reprove and condemn im- pieties and heretical doctrines, but to spare the men, and to pray for their salvation." Though burning with zeal against erroneous opinions, the apostolical fathers, like the apostles themselves, neither author- ised nor hinted any severity on the persoiis of those opposed to them. And now again, after having been overlaid for ages by the accumulated errors and op- pressions of the world, the spirit of the Gospel is rising and shaking the mountain-weight from its breast, and resuming its celestial character. Unlike the Jordan, it is not only pure in its fountain, but is gradually purifying the element of corruption which had neu- tralised and absorbed it. Like the waters of pro- phetic vision — its own appropriate type — it is "going * Serm. de Anathemate. L 110 CAUSES OF SCHISM. down into the desert and into the sea to heal the waters. And it shall come to pass that the waters shall be healed, and every thing shall live whither the river comes." Wherever it appears, the spectre of intolerance shrinks and retires from its presence, while the Divine principle of charity lifts up its head and feels re-assured. The splendid hope which some entertain, that Christianity will ultknately unite the whole Church in every article of faith and practice, in inward sentiment as well as outward form, is only, it is to be feared, a visionary prospect; though the fact that the Gospel should have awakened such an expectation, proclaims aloud its conciliator)' spirit. There is, however, a union which its subjects pray for, and its promises secure, a union of affection, which, "linking heart to heart, shall leave the judg- ment free, and out of the varying tones of many minds shall form one harmonious whole." Having thus endeavoured to arm the general ^reader against one of the most effective weapons of infidelity, we are prepared to look, without shrinking, at the worst dissensions and evils which have stained the history of the Christian Church ; for we feel assured, that if he has not piety to weep over those evils, his common sense will at least distinguish be- tween them and that Gospel which denounces them, and which is their only cure. Bellarmine enumerates twenty-six various schisms prior to 1450. And "all schisms," says Hale, "have 9 CAUSES OF SCHISM. Ill crept into the Church by one of these three ways, either upon matter of fact, or upon matter of opinion, or on point of ambition." As our present inquiry relates, however, not so much to the kinds of schism, as to the sources whence it proceeds, we propose to show that it has originated mostly in the opiniative self-importance of the members of the Church — in the imposing spirit of its ministers — in the corruption of both combined — and in the arrogance, intolerance, and ambition which one church has exercised towards another. To suppose that schism has, in any instance, arisen from a single and unmixed motive, especially where the agents have been many, and their characters various, would argue a very slender acquaintance with the complicated springs of human action. To take it for granted that the motive assigned by the schis- matic party, or its opponents, is the real or the only motive by which it is actuated, would evince a very superficial knowledge of human character. All that we can hope for, in an inquiry like the present, is an approximation to the truth. And, though schism may have sprung from other causes than those we have enumerated, we think it will be found that all the principal dissensions which have rent the Christian Church, have sprung from one or other of the sources we have named. I. The first cause we have specified, and which originated the first schism in the Church, is a spirit of 112 CAUSES OF SCHISM. self-importance in its members. Proud of their gifts, wanton in their freedom, and idolising the talents of their respective ministers, the members of the church at Corinth split into factions, dis- regarded the claims and feelings of all who did not belong to their particular party, and exhibited all that self-sufficiency, love of disputation, and con- tumacy, so prominent among the vices of the Greek character. About fifty years after they had received the apostolic rebuke, the same spirit of impatient self-importance led them to the undeserved dismissal of certain of their presbyters, and called forth a friendly remonstrance from Clement, and a deputa- tion from the church at Rome. Such was the first "root of bitterness" in the Christian vineyard — the origin of dissension in the Church. It appears to have been the excess of a principle wisely implanted in the human breast for the resistance of oppression, the preservation of inde- pendence, the pursuit of truth, and the encourage- ment of enterprise and improvement. But when let loose in the Church, it degenerates into the true spirit of sectarianism ; is vain, opiniative, and impatient of restraint. Perhaps, no wound has ever been inflicted on the peace of the Church, which this spirit has not inflamed, and tended to render incura- ble. In doctrine, it is speculative, fond of novelty, confident, and prolific of error ; hence arose Eutychi- anism, Photinianism, Sabellianism, and many other CAUSES OF SCHISM. 113 ancient errors, which are only so many names of schism. In discipline, it is impatient of government; looks on the milder graces as weaknesses ; and is not convinced that it is free unless it is refractory and in a state of active resistance. In a time of ecclesiasti- cal peace, it languishes for change, mistakes restless- ness for activity, and is ingenious in discovering grounds for dissatisfaction. When Christians are contending for the faith, it is apt to mistake a love of strife for the love of the truth. When interested in the choice of a minister or bishop, (as in the ancient Church it often was,) it must needs set up its own idol, though peace, and love, and even whole churches, should be the first sacrifices laid on its altar. This is what Cyprian calls Erigere altare contra altare ; and even describes as the fertile cause of all eccle- siastical disorders. And this is what appears to have originated the " grand schism," which, beginning in the rival elections of Urban VI. and Clement VII., divided the Roman church from 1378 to 1417, and contributed more than any other event to hasten the downfall of Papacy. And in times of Reforma- tion, this same pragmatic spirit has often quibbled about trifles, or pushed its demands to extremities, which have made the spirit of improvement itself turn away, and converted a change which might have been a blessing into a curse. Thus, in the third century, the maligned Novatians* — the earliest * The Puritans of their day — called Cathari, pure, L 3 114 CAUSES OF SCHISM. ecclesiastical reformers, and the first body of Chris- tians that separated from the general Church — un- happily went the length of refusing to re-admit any, however contrite, who had been once separated from the communion of the Church. And, in the same way, the Donatists in the fourth century — the second body separated from the general Church — who equal- led their adversaries in soundness of doctrine, and surpassed them, both in strictness of discipline and purity of morals — extravagantly required that every member should be re-baptised, and every minister re-ordained, who came over to them from any other church. By which excesses, reformation became proud intolerance, and separation schism. II. A second source of disunion in the Church — and the counterpart of the first — is a spirit of imposi- tion in its officers. Truth is one and indivisible ; but the introduction of error is an introduction of an ele- ment of division. Christian love, the product of that truth, is one ; and is meant to place us in harmony with all that receive it ; but to make that which is not essential to salvation essential to Christian com- munion is error, and as such is an element of division in the Christian Church. " Men are so in love with their ovm fancies and opinions," says Bishop Taylor, " as to think faith and all Christendom are concerned in their support and maintenance ; and whoever is not so fond, and does not dandle them like themselves, it grows up to a CAUSES OF SCHISM. 115 quarrel, which, because it is in materia theologice, is made a quarrel in religion, and God is entitled to it ; and then if you are once thought an enemy to God, it is our duty to persecute you even to death, we do God good service in it ; when, if we should examine the matter rightly, the question is either in materia non revelati, or minus evidenti, or non necessarid ; either it is not revealed, or not so clearly, but that wise and honest men may be of different minds, or else it is not of the foundation of faith, but a remote superstructure, or else of mere speculation, or, perhaps, when all comes to all, it is a false opinion, or a matter of human inte- rest, that we have so zealously contended for ; for to one of these heads most of the disputes of Christen- dom may be reduced ; so that I believe the present fractions (or the most) are from the same cause which St. Paul observed in the Corinthian schism, * When there are divisions among you, are ye not carnal?' Thence come schisms and parting of communions, and then persecutions, and then wars and rebellion, and then the dissolutions of all friend- ships and societies. All these mischiefs proceed not from this, that all men are not of one mind, for that is neither necessary nor possible, but that every opinion is made an article of faith, every article is a ground of a quarrel, every quarrel makes a faction, every faction is zealous, and all zeal pre- tends for God, and whatsoever is for God cannot be too much. We by this time are come to that pass. 116 CAUSES OF SCHISM. we think we love not God except we hate our bro- ther ; and we have not the virtue of religion, unless we persecute all religions but our own : for luke- warmness is so odious to God and man, that we, proceeding furiously upon these mistakes, by sup- posing we preserve the body, we destroy the soul of religion ; or by being zealous for faith, or, which is all one, for that which we mistake for faith, we are cold in charity, and so lose the reward of both." They who secede in consequence of such impositions may be wrong ; but they who occasion the secession must be wrong. The seceders, if wrong, are so only in the second place ; the first error consisted in sow- ing the seeds of schism. The spirit of which we are now speaking, delighted with the decency of forms, is blind to the indecency of the divisions they create. It originated the second schism of the Church by enforcing the observance of Easter on a particular day. Victor, Bishop of Rome, a.d. 196, arrogantly ordered the Asiatics to conform to the practice of Rome. They temperately, but firmly, resisted the aggression. Irritated at their refusal, he issued an edict of excommunication against all the churches of Asia. This act contained the first germ of papal arrogance; and occasioned a schism between the East and the West which was not healed for one hundred and thirty years. Indeed, to the activity of this spirit is to be as- cribed all those rites and human additions, which CAUSES OF SCHISM. 117 went on accumulating age after age, till the Church had become full; till outward religion had become an elaborated ceremonial to which invention itself could add nothing more ; and which only waited till the Council of Trent should pronounce the whole infallible and unalterable, in order to render the imposition complete. And as every addition had sooner or later occasioned dissension, so this crowning act, intended to secure to the whole fabric eternal repose, greatly hastened its downfall by proclaiming aloud the necessity of a Reformation. " Instead of composing differences in religion," says Bishop Bur- net,* "things were so nicely defined that they were made irreconcilable. Abuses for which there had been nothing but custom, and that much questioned, were now made warrantable." The Reformers, accustomed to this spirit of im- position in the Romish Church, brought away so much of it with them, though smarting under its effects, that even to this day the leaven continues to work, in different degrees, in almost every Pro- testant church. In the Church of England, it retained so many of the vestments, and enforced so many of the ceremonies of the Romish church, that many left her communion. Hence arose the sect of the Puritans, with the lamentable sequel of their sufferings and exile. In 1662, it issued the Act of Uniformity, requiring the solemn "assent and con- * History of the Reformation, Vol. III., Part II., p. 278. 118 CAUSES OF SCHISM. sent" of all her ministers to observances to which many of them objected; the consequence was that two thousand of her ablest sons seceded, and Non- conformity ensued. In the several communities into which Nonconformity has since divided, the same spirit is to be found under qualified forms, sowing dis- cord, and creating new divisions. Here, its favourite instrument is a Test — an instrument which, by incor- porating private opinions and human inventions with the scriptural terms of Christian Communion, pre- vents many from entering, or occasions them dis- quiet and induces them to leave after they have entered. The same spirit which stands at the entrance of St. Peter's, with the creed of Pius IV., " anathema- tising all things contrary thereto ;" and which stands at the gate of St. Paul's, requiring subscription to thirty-nine articles and the adoption of a ritual, as the terms of admission ; stands also at the door of many a chapel, requiring the applicant to pronounce the Shibboleth of the party within, before he can be allowed to cross the threshold, or be made free of the sect. It stands at the door of the pulpit, and says to the man whose life has been spent in the " unautho- rised" proclamation of " Christ crucified," and whose crown in heaven is laden with the gems of ministerial success, " Descend, I know you not — my mark is not upon you — make way for one, who, though a stranger to vital piety, and even denying the doctrines of grace, CAUSES OF SCHISM. 119 has yet more than atoned for the defect by the ready reception of my peculiar mark." And taking its stand at the table of the Lord, it guards the feast more jea- lously from the uncertificated believer, than from the sealed unbeliever. Nay, in some cases, after the " man of God" has been breaking to the multitude the bread of life from the pulpit, this spirit has met him on his way to the table of the Lord, and forbidden his approach. And thus does it make that sacred spot which should be the rallying point of all the faithful, the point of their repulsion and separation. There, where those who had been divided before should be- come one, it meets those who up to that point had been one, and compels them to separate. At the mouth of that harbour in which the entire Church should ride together at anchor in safety and repose, it has thrown across a bar which none can pass who will not submit to its pilotage and its terms. Happy for the Church — happy for the world, that the power of this spirit terminates on earth : how often else would it have detained the unyielding Christian from his crown, in the chamber of affliction ; or have pre- vented his entrance into heaven, by placing at its portal more than a fictions saint, and requiring more than the " Peter's pence." But he who has the " keys of hades and of death openeth and no man shutteth, and shutteth and no man openeth." According to Chillingworth,* "this presumptuous * Clhap. iv. 16. 120 CAUSES OF SCHISM. imposing of the senses of men upon the words of God .... and laying them upon men's consciences together under an equal penalty; this vain conceit that we can speak of the things of God better than in the words of God ; this deifying our own interpret- ations, and tyrannous enforcing them upon others .... is, and hath been, the only fountain of all the schisms of the Church, and that which makes them immortal ; the common incendiary of Christendom, and that which tears into pieces, not the coat, but the bowels and members of Christ: Ridente Turca nec dolente JudcBO. Take away these walls of separation, and all will quickly be one. Take away this persecuting, cursing, burning, damning of men for not subscribing to the words of men as the words of God ; require of Christians only to believe Christ, and to call no man master, but him only ; let those leave claiming infal- libility that have no title to it, and let them that in their words disclaim it, disclaim it likewise in their actions." III. The third cause of division in the Church which we named, is its departure from scriptural purity and primitive simplicity — in other words, its general corruption. The very first step which the Church took in departure from its Divine original, contained in it the principle of future discord. What- ever that step may have had to recommend it at the time, however long it may have been in pro- ducing its legitimate effects ; the seed was sown, and CAUSES OF SCHISM. 121 the bitter fruit was certain : — in this respect resem- bling that fabled tree of which it is related, that who- ever reposed in its shade, and inhaled its odour, though they lay down as friends, awoke to be enemies. Its earliest consequence would naturally be, to pre- pare the way for a second step, if not even to necessitate it. The effect of these would be to create a distaste for that book which seemed, at least, to rebuke the departure. And when once this feeling came to be indulged — when once expediency carried it over the word of God — the path of corruption would be broad and easy. Alas, how early in the history of the Church this dreadful consummation arrived ! and with what fearful rapidity the materials of corruption were collected and combined ! But every part of that prodigious organisation of evil involved the elements of repulsion and dissolu- tion. The " Unity of the Church," indeed, was the theme of loud and constant boast. But it was the union of the contents of a boiling cauldron — kept together by iron force — but restless, heaving, and frequently fermenting over into a fire which instantly consumed them; for whoever left the Church, left to his destruction. Even Popes were, at times, denounced as heretics ; others were excommunicated as rivals. Anathemas were hurled — churches were cut off — and empires laid under ban. Many of the religious fraternities and institutions which sprang up, originated in a vague sense of the want of the M 122 CAUSES OF SCHISM. unity and peace proper to a church : but they them- selves soon yielded to the surrounding corruption, and indicated by their decline the eventual decay of the whole system. INIany left, from time to time, chiefly for the sake of leaving schism behind them ; but they were denounced as schismatics, and punished accordingly. The Reformation commenced ; — but the Council of Trent embodied tenets, which till then had been left comparatively free, into a binding and perpetual creed. Protestantism, therefore, came into existence both by right and by compulsion. Those materials of corruption which had, from the first, been creating and necessitating division, now produced their natural results. The Reformation was, principally, a conflict between the elements of schism and the principles of catholic Christian fellow- ship; so that when these had disengaged and de- tached themselves, little more than those remained. The church of Rome ceased to be catholic, and became Roman Catholic — the great schismatic of Christendom, denouncing and consigning to perdition all who do not belong to her communion. Well had it been for the cause of truth if all who left the Papal church, had left behind them the whole of its corruptions. Some of them escaped, indeed, much less infected than others — but none of them entirely free. And just in proportion as either of the Reformed churches retained the old leaven, in that exact proportion has it occasioned division, and in- CAUSES OF SCHISM. 123 dulged in the exclusive spirit. " Every plant," said Christ — and he spoke prospectively, as well as in reference to existing evils — "every plant which my heavenly Father hath not planted shall be rooted up." Whether it relate to laxity of discipline, to the multiplication of offices, to the imposition of rites, the assumption of exclusive powers, or the adoption of unscriptural tests, the time will come when the worldly exotic will be rooted up and cast away. No plea of expediency, of custom, of antiquity, or of numbers, will save it from extirpation. In the mean- time, God will not entirely forsake that portion of his vineyard in which it exists, provided other plants of " his right hand planting " are found there also. " Showers of blessing" shall descend there; and often shall it "smell like a field which the Lord hath blessed ;" but far more fragrant and fruitful would it be, were it not for those petty and para- sitical additions which have gradually shaded and overtopped many of its fairest plants. While man, in the meantime, holding in his hand the word of God, and discovering no warrant for them there, shall often inquire, " How came they to be intro- duced ? and why are they suffered to continue ? " and shall either remain to be dissatisfied, or depart to prepare another and a separate enclosure. Thus cor- ruptions multiply divisions ; and charity, if it survive, survives only by retiring, and retires only to mourn. IV. A fourth, and a very fertile source of schism. 124 CAUSES OF SCHISM. is to be found in that spirit of intolerance, and self- willed ambition, which seeks to subordinate all men and all things to itself. Socrates of Constantinople excuses himself for occasionally introducing secular affairs into his ecclesiastical history, by pleading that he did so merely to relieve the reader, who would otherwise be bewildered with the quarrels of rival bishops and churches contending for the supremacy. And yet this was as early as the sixth century. The head of the mighty serpent, indeed, was seen project- ing from its den as early as the second century, when Victor, bishop of Rome, arrogated the power of commanding the East ; and again in the third, when Stephen excommunicated the churches of Asia and Africa for daring to differ from him on the subject of baptism ; but the fangs and the poison were then wanting. As ages elapsed, the huge reptile uncoiled its voluminous folds, emerged farther and farther from its fearful recess, and moved on from object to object, coiling around and drawing all things to itself, till nearly the whole of Europe was either lying complacently in its folds, or imprisoned and crushed in its deadly convolutions, as in the links of fate. But the history of its progress to this fearful result, is the history of the vilest passions, and the most fatal schisms — schisms in which the great sees of Alexan- dria, Constantinople, Antioch, and especially Rome, stand forth in the attitude of fixed and sworn hostility to each other, and to every rival power. CAUSES OF SCHISM. 125 It is of the essence of intolerance that it cannot hear of the existence of a rival, without taking what it conceives to be the most expeditious method, not of reclaiming, but of punishing and destroying him. Hence it was that as soon as ever the material sword came within its reach in the time of Constantine, it seized and wielded the weapon with deadly effect. Controversies, which would otherwise have cooled and evaporated on paper, were thus raised to an adventitious importance, and bequeathed as legiti- mate quarrels to posterity. And sects — the Arian especially — which would otherwise probably have discharged their ardour in words, and then have gradually fallen back into the ranks of the orthodox, were thus engaged to maintain and fortify their hostile position. The Inquisition is to be regarded as the true personification of intolerance. All the principles and practices of bigotry which for ages had been accumulating and gathering strength, were collected and organised in that terrible engine of persecution. And with what appalling and wide-wasting effect did the Church work it ! From the moment it was completed, intolerance gave itself up to the fearful office. "Not merely the results of thought, but thinking itself;" not merely heretical opinions, but new opinions of any kind; became the marks of its hatred, and received its deadly bolts. The only way M 3 126 CAUSES OF SCHISM. in which it now evinced attachment to its creed, was by destroying all who questioned it. It might have been hoped that the reformers who had themselves been scourged by intolerance from the church of Rome, would have jealously guarded against its intrusion into the new churches. But, alas, the demon possessed them. Love was the first sacrifice immolated on the altar of Truth. Luther, Calvin, Cranmer, and Knox, protected their creeds, as far as they had the power, with temporal penalties. And even some of those who were driven by into- lerance from England to Amei'ica, commenced a persecution against the Quakers no less furious than that from which they themselves had fled. Nor does the cause of intolerance languish yet. Though more than ever disowned and reprobated with the tongue, it enjoys the secret countenance, and the tried and faithful services, of a mixed mul- titude in all communions. It can boast of animosities as bitter — dominations as lordly — exactions as op- pressive — calumnies as unfounded — and contentions as furious as ever. It finds as much difficulty as ever in conceiving of salvation out of its own little enclo- sure. It still looks on the reformer who only ventures humbly to suggest, and mildly to plead, as a schis- matic and a foe. It still clings, if not with greater, at least with equal, tenacity to its own little devices and ceremonial additions, as to the great verities and CAUSES OF SCHISM. 127 ordinances of heaven; enforcing them all as of equal authority. It is as unable as ever to perceive the preferableness of leaving the conscience free in non-essential things, as the Lord of conscience has done ; and of thus forbearing to widen a breach which ought never to have existed. Infallibility it repu- diates as a doctrine, yet still gives itself the unwinning airs of that lofty attribute. Penal canons which have long been superannuated, it still retains unrepealed, as the darling memorials of its more palmy days. Not one jot will it abate of its exclusive and jure- divino claims, though the great Head of the Church is evidently and impartially employing and prospering every Christian denomination, not according to its supposed apostolic descent, but its apostolic piety and zeal. Angels rejoice over one sinner that repenteth ; but, in every religious community, the spirit of into- lerance exults more in a proselyte from another church than in a convert from the world. By " the honour of Christ," it still means the interest of its own party; by " Christian charity," the love of that party ; and by " scriptui'al union," the subjugation of Christendom to the cherished peculiarities of that party. These are the causes, then, which we regard as having been, in all ages of the Church, most prolific of unchristian divisions. Many of those divisions, indeed, which ecclesiastical writers have consented to 128 CAUSES OF SCHISM. call schisms, have originated in other causes, and should have been called by other names. But where- ever schism has existed — wherever the law of Chris- tian love has been violated — or the peace of the Church disturbed — or those have been separated who ought to have been united — there, one or other of these causes, combined perhaps with many minor influences, is sure to be found present and active. Among the many important reflections suggested by this chapter, the following seem almost forced on our attention. 1. That the additions which man has made, from time to time, to the ordinances of God, have been the most fruitful sources of agitation and quarrel. 2. That even these have not led to actual separation, until they have been authoritatively enforced and made indispensable. 3. That neither the one nor the other could have taken place, if the authority of the Bible had been revered and regarded as paramount. 4. That the supreme authority of the Bible waned in the Church just in proportion as unsanctified wealth, and rank, and influence, were allowed to gain the ascendant; till the Church had become a worldly corporation, and the Bible was silenced and virtually expelled. 5. That the admis- sion of irreligious men to place or power in a Christian church, is the admission of so many agents of schism ; and hence it is, partly, that, in the consummation of that kingdom which is never to be rent or moved, all CAUSES OF SCHISM. 129 such are to be excluded. 6. And, that the Christian love which the Gospel breathes, and which is to be found in the faithful alone, is the only balm to heal the wounds with which the Church is bleeding at the hands of schisni. CHAPTER V. THE MEANS BY WHICH THE DIVISIONS OF THE CHURCH ARE PERPETUATED. Owing to the operation of the causes specified in the preceding chapter, the map of Christendom presents to the eye of an observer three grand divisions, each of which is again divided and subdivided into nu- merous parts. In the first grand division are to be found the churches and sects which date prior to the Reformation. Here are the ancient, isolated, and deeply interesting Syrian churches of Malay-ala — the Waldensian church, in the Protestant valleys of Pied- mont — the Greek church, with its cold and childish formalities — the picture-loving and amulet-wearing Russian church — the fasting and ascetic church of Armenia — the semi-Mohammedan Georgian — the incense-loving Coptic — the corrupt, but independent and papal-hating church of Abyssinia — and, lastly, and chiefly, the baptised paganism of the church of Rome. MEANS PERPETUATING DIVISIONS, &c. 131 The second division contains the churches and sects commencing with the Reformation. These consist of the German Lutheran church — the distinct churches of Sweden, Denmark, Geneva, the Hel- vetic reformed churches, and the reformed churches of France, the united Church of England and Ireland, and the Church of Scotland. And the third, includes those sects and churches which have subsequently arisen out of the Reforma- tion, and which are in existence at the present time. Here — confining our attention to the principal deno- minations existing in Britain — we behold the Con- gregational Independents, the Baptists, the Friends or Quakers, the Presbyterian Dissenters, and the Me- thodists, with more than one respectable and flourish- ing secession. Having traced these divisions of the Christian Church to their principal sources in the preceding chapter, we have now to point out the influences which have originated and perpetuated the last class of those divisions ; especially as they exist between the Church of England and the various bodies of sepa- ratists; and which are still, in some respects, widen- ing the separation, as well as occasioning among the separatists new divisions. Did our limits permit, we should, for this purpose, present the reader, first, with an account of those spe- cific acts by which new breaches have from time to time been occasioned, or by which existing divisions have 132 MEANS PERPETUATING THE been widened : and then, secondly, we should point out those general causes which led to those acts, and which are still perpetuating and aggravating their consequences. But as our limits require us to choose between the two, we shall select the latter; aiming, however, to supply partially, by historical illustration, the want of the former. The same causes which produce divisions, subse- quently operate to prolong them. And hence a spirit of factious self-importance — of arbitrary impo- sition — of consequent corruption — and of arrogant intolerance and ambition, having originated schisms, are still active in promoting their continuance. But following these waters of strife in their tortuous course through the Church, we find that, like other streams, they branch off in various directions, taking, as they proceed, other forms, and new denomina- tions. 1. The first of these causes in the order of time, if not of rank, is the predominance of secular influence in the internal and spiritual affairs of the Church. This, indeed, was the primary occasion of secession from the English Establishment. Had the Reformation here, as on the Continent, arisen more directly from the bosom of the Church itself— had it been the gra- dual result of investigation, controversy, ecclesiastical zeal, and popular desire, instead of springing almost suddenly as it did, from royal spleen and caprice, there is reason to conclude that it would have re- DIVISIONS OF THE CHURCH. 133 tained fewer traces of the church from which it had come. " But Henry VIII. took the lead ; power became revolutionary; and hence it happened, at least in its origin, that, as a redress of ecclesiastical abuses, as an emancipation of the human mind, the reform in England was much less complete than upon the Con- tinent. It was made, as might naturally be ex- pected, in accordance with the interests of its au- thors. The king and the episcopacy, which was here continued, divided between themselves the riches and the power of which they despoiled their prede- cessors, the Popes. The effect of this was soon felt. The Reformation, people cried out, had been closed, while the greater part of the abuses, which had in- duced them to desire it, were still continued. "The Reformation appeared under a more po- pular form ; it made the same demands of the bishops that had been made of the Holy See ; it accused them of being so many Popes. As often as the general fate of the religious revolution was compromised, whenever a struggle against the ancient church took place, the various portions of the revolution party rallied together, and made common cause against the common enemy ; but this danger over, the struggle again broke out among themselves; the popular form again attacked the aristocratic and royal reform, de- nounced its abuses, complained of its tyranny, called N 134 MEANS PERPETUATING THE upon it to make good its promises, and not to usurp itself the power which it had just dethroned."* As it was, indeed, it received a national existence somewhat earlier than it otherwise would ; but what it gained in point of time, it lost in purity and in capacity of receiving subsequent improvement. It was modelled too closely after the form of a civil government, not far at that time from despotic, and partook too largely of its lordly spirit. Splendour was considered its royal birthright ; and hence, many of those appendages which ought to have been cast off, and left at the threshold of the ancient church, were unhappily retained. A large body of the Pu- ritans objected to these ; " but, at this moment," writes Bishop Jewel, " the Queen is unable to endure any change whatever in matters of religion." Some of the bishops themselves deprecated them; "but," adds the same authority, '^we are not consulted."! The royal will was paramount, and would not bend ; and a large secession from the Establishment was the result. Then was opened a fountain of secularity which has ever since been flowing and operating pre- judicially to the interests of the English Church and of religion. The Crown retaining the eccle- siastical patronage and power which it then asumed, • Guizot's History of Civilisation in Europe, t See his Letters to Peter Martyr and BuUinger. DIVISIONS OF THE CHURCH. 135 has continued pouring in a stream of worldli- ness, in a constant succession of worldly minis- ters. And the Establishment, unwilling to relin- quish the temporal distinction and prerogatives with which it was then invested, has continued to feed the worldliness of some of its members, and to grieve the spirit, and impair the usefulness of others. The consequence of which has been, that those without the church have never ceased to object and reproach, and those within have never ceased to rejoin. Besides which, the spirit of division is necessarily engendered and kept alive in her own bosom, between the spi- ritual who love her for her intrinsic excellence, and relative usefulness, and the secular who esteem her principally for her outward attractions and her dowry. In the vocabulary of the latter, "those professed members of the Establishment who affect the title of evangelical .... are schismatics," and their Bible and Missionary Society operations pronounced unautho- rised. For as in the individual Christian, sin is the source of internal dissension, "warring against the law of the mind," so in a Christian church, whether established or not, secularity, in the exact proportion in which it obtains, must necessarily operate as a dis- turbing power. II. Divisions, already existing, have been greatly exasperated and increased by the adoption of unscrip- tural tests and terms of communion, for the real or pretended purpose of procuring uniformity. True it 136 MEANS PERPETUATING THE is that all churches must have some terms of commu- nion; but that any society assuming the name of a church, should establish conditions, distinct from those enjoined by Christ and his apostles, is, one would think, sufficiently presumptuous. That these terms should consist, partly, of things which the imposers themselves acknowledge to be " indifferent and insig- nificant," seems to add folly to presumption. But that these insignificant things should be enforced, on men who conscientiously object to them, on pain of temporal ruin, seems to be an act conceived in the spirit of pure intolerance. "To multiply articles," says Bishop Taylor, " and to adopt them into the family of the faith, and to require assent to such ar- ticles . . . .equal to that assent we give to matters of faith, is to build a tower upon the top of a bulrush ; and the further the effect of such proceedings does extend, the worse they are; the very making such a law is unreasonable; the inflicting spiritual censures upon them that cannot do so much violence to their under- standing as to obey, is ineffectual and unjust." " If they be little things only that we add," says the ca- tholic-spirited Howe, "we must know that there is nihil minimum — nothing little in religion. What if, little as they are, many think them sinful, and are thereby thrown off from our communion ! The less they are, the greater the sin to make them necessary, to hang so great things upon them, break the church's peace and unity by them, and of them to make a new DIVISIONS OF THE CHURCH. 137 Gospel, new terms of life and death, a new way to heaven .... It is, in effect, to say. If you will not take Christianity with these additions of ours, you shall not be Christians, you shall have no Christian ordinances^ no Christian worship : we will, as far as in us is, ex- clude you heaven itself, and all means of salvation. And upon the same ground on which they may be excluded one communion by such arbitrary measures, they may be excluded another also, and be received nowhere. And if the terms of these communions differ, they all exclude one another ; and hence, so many churches, so many Christendoms. If this be sinful, it is a sin of the deepest die. And if the holy Scriptures speak with such severity, as we know they do, of the altering of man's landmarks, what may we think of altering God's ! "* And yet such was the famous Act of Uniformity, by which, in 1662, the English Church lost two thousand ministers, many of whom ranked among the most pious, useful, and exemplary of her clergy ; the validity of Presbyterian ordination was renounced; the ministrations of the foreign churches were dis- owned; the terms of conformity raised higher than before the civil wars ; and, contrary to the manner of proceeding in the times of Elizabeth and Cromwell — both of whom reserved for the subsistence of each ejected clergyman a fifth of his benefice — no pro- vision was made for those who should be deprived * Preface to The Carnality of Religious Contention. N 3 138 MEANS PERPETUATING THE of their livings ;* in consequence of which the demon of schism received an accession of seven-fold activity, and an indefinite grant of life. But if we suppose the act so sinful, "how far," asks the same impartial Howe, " doth the guilt of it spread ! How few among the several sorts and parties of Christians are innocent, if the measures of their several communions were brought under just and severe examination ! How few that lay their communions open to visible Christians as such, excluding none of whatsoever denomination; nor receiving any that by Christian rational estimate cannot be judged such ! " Yes, how few the churches that have not had the Hydes and the Sheldons of that day among their advisers and their members ! How few that have not even now their own little Acts of Uniformity extant and in operation ! How- large the sect of the intolerant in every church — men to whom history relates all the instances of the wickedness and inutility of persecution in vain — who lay great stress on little things, magnifying trifles into matters of grave importance — who flatter themselves that their creed or test includes aU truth and excludes all error — that their little enclosure, with its wicket entrance, contains and monopolises the Saviour of the world— who would make their conscience the universal rule, and look on every conscience that differs from it as culpably ignorant * Mosheim, Vol. v., p. 369. Note. DIVISIONS OF THE CHURCH. 139 and even punishably perverse— and whose millennium consists of a state of unexceptionable conformity to their creed. Ever let us remember that the Christian Church, in its scriptural state, contains nothing but pure and catholic principles of all-embracing love. The ex- clusive spirit, therefore, is the schismatic spirit; and he who prescribes a term of communion with it of his own devising — however simple in itself, and plausible in its appearance — is putting a price on the bread of life, and throwing a bar across the entrance to a city of refuge ; and they who continue that term, share his responsibility, and are charge- able with perpetuating the schism of intolerance. III. The evil in question is maintained also, according to Lord Bacon,* "by an extreme and unlimited detestation of some heresy or corruption of the Church already acknowledged and convicted. Men have made it as it were their scale, by which to measure the bounds of the most perfect religion — taking it by the farthest dis- tance from the error last condemned." This strong tendency of a divided Church to seek truth in extremes, he afterwards traces in a manner which serves to illustrate the progress of ecclesiastical divi- sions generally. This proneness to embrace the opposite of wrong as necessarily right, is seen in the extreme demand which some of the Puritans * Chorcli ControTcrsies. 140 MEANS PERPETUATING THE made for the re-ordination of the clergy from the Papal church ; and in the antagonist position main- tained by the Church of England, that they alone could properly serve at her altars without re-ordination. It led some of the Nonconformists to condemn those of their brethren who practised "occasional con- formity," or communion with the Church of England; and led some of the members of that church to introduce a bill into the House of Commons against " occasional conformity," which utterly incapacitated a man for holding any civil office, unless his com- munion with the Establishment was constant. Thus, many of the adherents of each side, forgetting the great Christian principles which they held in com- mon, degenerated into a faction, which strictly pro- hibited its respective members from intercommunion ; and which thus changed the catholic " communion of saints " into the exclusive communion of partisans. And still this factious spirit may be traced, jealous of any communication between the parties, except an interchange of frowns, and looks of defiance. Each side may be conscious of certain defects in its own system, and may perceive certain excellences in the system of the other; but it fears to confess the former, or to admit and adopt the latter, lest it should look like a concession to the superiority of its oppo- nents. It is an ancient maxim of wisdom, that it is right to learn even from an enemy; accordingly, an army no sooner finds that the foe is employing a new DIVISIONS OF THE CHURCH. 141 and an effectual weapon, than it immediately copies and adopts the deadly invention ; but an ecclesiastical faction, heedless of the maxim, and more saturated with hostility than the ranks of war, would regard the adoption of a useful principle or measure by its supposed opponents, as an adequate reason for never introducing it into its own service. Many a Church- man perceives the benefit which would accrue to public devotion, by combining with the liturgy the advantages of free prayer ; and many a Dissenter feels that parts of the liturgy would enhance the advantages of extemporaneous prayer : but the spirit of party forbids the improvement, lest the one should appear to be conceding to the other. Indeed, there is reason to fear, that should either become so far superior to this evil spirit as to adopt the improve- ment, the other would regard it as an additional argument for remaining in statu quo. Thus it is that the advocates of a principle degenerate into the partisans of a faction ; the pretended preference for truth becomes a conflict of prejudices ; and men who should be living together at the equator, have removed from each other to the poles. IV. An obstinate attachment to things as they are, is another cause of perpetuating divisions. The blind zeal of innovation, we admit, is equally to be condemned. But the spirit of which we now speak is, not that which deprecates revolution, but which refuses improvement. Had it existed under the 14-2 MEANS PERPETUATING THE patriarchal dispensation, it would fain have prolonged that imperfect economy to the present day. It forgets that immutability belongs alone to infinite perfection; and that gradual change is a condition essential to adaptation and finite progression. It may flow from three causes. Sometimes, it arises probably from a reluctance to surrender any thing which was once held dear by our ancestors. But, however chivalrous, and, to a certain extent laudable, such a feeling may be, we should bear in mind that, by correcting an abuse, we are not questioning their piety, only admitting that they were not perfect ; that the will of God is paramount to every other con- sideration ; and that the best tribute we can pay to departed excellence is to try to improve on it. Some- times, it may spring from a selfish regard to temporal emolument. The makers of shrines for the goddess Diana could little be expected to allow any change in the form or worship of the image, if the sale or the profits of the shrines were to be thereby diminished. As little can those be expected to listen to any plan of ecclesiastical improvement whose highest desires are realised in obtaining a worldly competence from their religious ofilce ; except, indeed, the plan should secure an increase of property and distinction. To all such, the idea of change is closely associated with the idea of loss, poverty, and ruin. And, in other instances, it doubtless originates in pride. The adoption of a proposed change would imply that we DIVISIONS OF THE CHURCH. 143 had been wrong ; that we were not so wise yesterday as we are to-day — a humiliation which our self- importance cannot brook. A spirit of improvement, by marking the signs of the times, taking counsel of wisdom, and correcting obvious defects, would be eminently a spirit of conciliation. By evincing merely a ivillingness to advance, where improvement was necessary, we should be disarming our bitterest foes, and changing the more estimable of our oppo- nents into friends ; we should be rendering that which is good much more efficient; that which is efficient, popular ; and that which is popular, per- manent. But a spirit of blind and bigoted attach- ment to things as they are, by virtually claiming infallibility, proclaims our infatuation ; renders re- conciliation hopeless ; and furnishes those who diflPer from us with a ground of self-justification and triumph. V. A fruitful source of the schismatic spirit in the present day, is the wide-spread prevalence of ecclesiastical assumption. The writer is aware that a large class of British Christians look on the political ascendency of the Episcopal Church through its con- nexion with the State, as one of the chief causes of schism. And, no doubt, the exaltation of one part of the Christian community to the necessary depression of the other parts, has inflamed — whether justifiably or not, we stop not here to inquire — the jealousies and animosities of all. But judging from the Chris- 144 MEANS PERPETUATING THE tian amity and co-operation which have existed in many places between Episcopalians and Dissenters, notwithstanding the political ascendency in question ; and remembering how much closer still the bonds of union might be drawn on the removal of certain canonical restrictions; we are led to conclude that both might enjoy the substantial fruits of Christian union, even during the existence of that ascendency. On the other hand, remembering the exclusive spirit of a certain part of the Christian community in America, where no such political ascendency exists, we are compelled to infer that the separation of Church and State would not necessarily heal existing divisions ; but the cause we have just speci- fied — ecclesiastical assumption — might still be nearly as prolific as ever in alienation and strifes. Though the reader may unhappily have become familiar with the language and tenets of such assump- tion — so frequently has it of late been employed — though he may be aware that it affirms the Estab- lished Church to be the only true and real church, (the church of Rome excepted ;) declares the ministry of every other communion to be invalid; its sacraments nugatory; and its members con- sequently exposed to perdition — he may not be so familiar with the fact that these air-built claims and unchristian denunciations do not belong to the original constitution of the English Church, but are the subsequent additions of a Protestant Popery. DIVISIONS OF THE CHURCH. 145 There is not in her Articles, Homilies, or Liturgy, a single sentence that disfranchises other Protestant churches ; nor is the validity of her sacraments any where traced up to the Episcopal succession. On the contrary, the twenty-third article was wisely framed so as to acknowledge the orders of Christian ministers of all denominations ; for it declares, that " we ought to judge those to be lawfully called and sent into the ministry which are chosen and called to this work by men who have public authority given unto them in the congregation to call and send ministers into the Lord's vineyard." Accordingly, a considerable number of ministers were, in the reigns of Edward "VI. and Queen Elizabeth, em- ployed in the English Establishment, who had only received Presbyterian ordination in Holland or at Geneva. Knox, the Scots Reformer; Whittingham, Dean of Durham; the learned Wright, of Cam- bridge ; Morrison, a Scots divine ; and Travers, chaplain to Secretary Cecil, and lecturer to the Temple, are among the names which first occur to us. " All the churches professing the Gospel," writes Travers to Lord Treasurer Burleigh, " receive likewise to the exercise of the ministry among them, all such as have been lawfully called before in any of the churches of our confession. And in the Church of England the same hath been always observed unto this day." We know, also, that several of the foreign Re- o 146 MEANS PERPETUATING THE formers were invited to England by Edward. Peter Martyr had the divinity chair given him at Oxford ; Bucer had the same at Cambridge ; while Ochinus and Fagius had canonries in English cathedrals. " The Reformers," says Neale, " admitted the ordi- nation of foreign churches by mere presbyters till towai-ds the middle of this reign, (Elizabeth;) when their validity hec/an to he disputed and denied. Thus the Church advanced in her claims, and re- moved by degrees to a greater distance from the foreign Protestants." And, having reached a spot sufficiently distant to satisfy their arrogance and in- tolerance, the children of bigotry have busied them- selves ever since in building themselves in from the approaches of Christian charity ; and, at this moment, the writers of the Oxford Tracts are employed in completing the ramparts, mounting their artillery, and denouncing the whole of Protestant Christendom, with the mimic thunders of the Vatican. "Almost the only Protestant church who have retained the episcopal form, are we,* in this nineteenth century, to exhibit to the world the odious intolerance which would unchurch almost all the churches of Christen- dom, except that which has long been defaced by inveterate corruptions, and stained with the blood of the saints ? Never again, I hope, will any one who calls himself a minister of Christ in the Church of * Fundamental Reform of the Church Establishment, &c. By a Clergyman. P. 44. 9 DIVISIONS OF THE CHURCH. 147 England, so offend against Christ through his people, as to deny his commission to the great and good men who laboured with Luther, Zuingle, Calvin, and Knox, to establish the profession of the Gospel in Germany, Switzerland, and Scotland. Never may the faithful ministers of Christ now labouring in the Pays de Vaud, at Geneva, in France, and in Ger- many, think of us, as disgraced by the bigotry which would deny them to be ministers of Christ. Never may Guassen, Adolphe Monod, Merle d'Aubigne, Colany Nee, Tholuck, and the other excellent men who are labouring on the Continent to promote reli- gion, think of us, as extruding them from the visible Church of Christ. By so doing, we in fact excom- municate ourselves, and are found in melancholy isolation from the purest churches of Christ, and in hateful conjunction with that one which the word of God has branded with an irreversible anathema. But if we fraternise with the churches on the Conti- nent, we are equally bound to recognise the churches of America, and the Dissenters of England. Their orders are the same — their discipline little differs. What reason is there for allowing the Presbyterian orders of Geneva, and denying the congregational orders of New England ? And if the congregational orders of New England be allowed, why should we disallow those of Bristol, of Birmingham, or of Lon- don? When will our sectarian jealousies cease? Surely we cannot any longer deny the orders of 148 MEANS PERPETUATING THE foreign churches ; and common sense forbids that we allow those orders abroad and disallow them at home. But if we do no longer disallow them, the acknow- ledgment should be public, and generous, and bro- therly. Let not other denominations see, or fancy, that we now cherish an irreligious sectarianism in ourselves, more exclusive and more proud than that which we condemn in them." Nor let the Dissenter hastily conclude that he is quite invulnerable to the charge of sectarian assump- tion. As often as he dogmatises on the minute particulars of the apostolic pattern ; denounces as unsound and unsafe whatever is not at the farthest possible remove from certain supposed errors; de- mands that every church on earth should be moulded according to his notions of the primitive model ; and, in the pride of his heart, anticipates the univer- sal extension of his favourite government unim- proved and entire ; he is making an additional remove from the enlarged and enlightened charity of the Gospel, is an active agent of dissension, and is proving himself nearer of kin than he imagines to the intolerants of Oxford and of Rome. VI. Another very effectual means of perpetuating divisions among Christians consists in the illiberal prejudices instilled by a party education into the minds of youth. The religious department of in- struction is occupied, by many a parent and tutor, not so much with the inculcation of the fundamental DIVISIONS OF THE CHURCH. 149 doctrines and cardinal duties of Christianity, as in teaching their pupils the peculiarities of their own party, and the errors and evils of those from whom they chiefly differ. But even were they sensible of this impropriety, and disposed to avoid it, where is the stream of ecclesiastical history to which they can point the youthful lip, unadulterated by the ore and earth of the party-channel through which it flows? and how few the youth who have read treatises of doctrinal theology without imbibing prejudices against a party, owing to the unjust representation they received of its peculiar tenets, or of their supposed practical consequences. Thus character is poisoned in its infancy, by the very means which should have been its aliment and life. The mind becomes a soil prepared for the growth of every root of bitter- ness ; predisposed for whatever is intolerant in spirit, angry in controversy, and slanderous in report. The party whose prejudices he inherits, gains a bigot ; every other party, an enemy ; and the univer- sal Church of Christ, whose agent and ornament he might have become, is stained with disgrace. VII. The application to our opponents of re- proachful epithets is also to be numbered among the auxiliaries of schism. Terms of this kind have always been acting an important part in the history of mankind. On every subject exciting to the pas- sions, whether good or bad, their influence has always been great; and especially, therefore, on that most o 3 150 MEANS PERPETUATING THE momentous and exciting of all subjects — religion. Here, almost every appellation has been either a weapon, a stigma, a pass-word, or a badge. Nearly every leading ecclesiastical term has an eventful history of its own. Epithets which at first were innocent and merely distinctive, like the distinctive rods of the Egyptian diviners, have been changed into ser- pents by the necromancy of the passions. Terms which, at first, only served, have at length, like many an obscure individual in eastern lands, come to exercise a despotic sway. And terms which were once offensively employed, have at length, like an- cient weapons of war, been displaced by others more sure in their aim, and more destructive in their effect ; and have even come to be employed as terms of honour and excellence. The transmigration of ecclesiastical terms is no fable. The epithets, Puritans, Methodists, Sectarians, Schismatics, Saints, Evangelicals, Voluntaries, Com- pulsories, have each in turn been pressed and sworn into the service of party. And the worst purposes of party they answer in two ways. They are so easily remembered and expeditiously applied, compared with an argument, that numbers who could neither comprehend nor employ the latter, ai'e retained in the cause of faction by means of the former. And, having once employed them, their anger rises, and their contempt of those against whom the epithets are cast increases, in exact proportion to DIVISIONS OF THE CHURCH. 151 the frequency with which they are repeated. And, besides inflaming the passions of those who employ them, by excitement, they wound and irritate those who are their objects, by insult. An argument might be answered or evaded ; a historical fact might be met by a counter fact ; and an assertion be neutralised by denial; and, in either case, the second person feels that he has done something, and is satisfied. But a term of reproach is the barbed and poisoned arrow of controversy which remains and rankles ; which turns anger into hatred, and an opponent into a foe. True, he may retaliate in kind ; but, in that case, the evil is doubled ; " the rent is made worse." VIII. The very exceptionable manner in which ecclesiastical controversies are conducted in the pre- sent day, necessarily tends to inflame division. And here we might advert to the growing frequency with which the pulpit is made the vehicle of inflammatory appeals. That hallowed spot which, like another Calvary, should be sacred to the cross, is lighted up with the strange fires of " the wrath of man." When the minister should pour out nothing but the result of his closet devotions and scriptural meditations, he boils over with the unholy excitement of newspaper and pamphlet appeals. Where the private Christian comes for the pure bread of life, he receives it, if at all, mixed with the gravel and thorns of ecclesiasti- cal debate. And, there, where the perturbed should come to be tranquillised, the peaceful leave in a state 152 MEANS PERPETUATING THE of alarming apprehension of some impending cala- mity. Another circumstance to be greatly deplored is, that the religious controversy should have fallen so completely into the hands of men whose principal qualification for conducting it lies in their pugna- city ; and who have acquired the office chiefly by the reckless extravagance of their statements, and the energy of their abuse. These are the Circum- celliones of the third century, and the Montanarii of the fourteenth — the mercenaries and bludgeon- men of the war, who are comparatively regardless whether party triumphs over principle or the reverse, provided they continue to enjoy their notoriety and to receive their pay. Bacon remarked concerning the " Church Controversies " of his day, that to search and rip up wounds with a laughing coun- tenance ; to intermix Scripture and scurrility in one sentence ; the majesty of religion and the contempt and deformity of things ridiculous ; is a thing far from the reverence of a devout Christian, and hardly becoming the honest regard of a sober man. There are now lying before the writer numerous extracts from anonymous pamphlets, magazines, essays, tracts, and newspapers, in which all that Bacon deprecated is done, and much more. Here, on both sides, historical facts are distorted. Scripture is misquoted and misapplied, faults are blackened and magmfied into startling crimes, the rules of argumentative DIVISIONS OF THE CHURCH. 153 justice are grossly violated, obvious mistakes are eagerly seized and aggravated into intentional false- hood, candid admissions are taken advantage of and turned into grave accusations, the sanctity of private friendship is profaned, old and one-sided information is received and employed in preference to that which is more recent and complete, seeming inconsistencies enlarged on as real contradictions, parts of statements quoted as the whole, and citations perverted so as to convey a meaning contrary to the intention of the author, and of truth ; and all this is done too in the name of the God of Truth and Love — with a plausible affectation of sincere concern for the pros- perity of religion ! The consequence is, that the calm and Christian reasoner shrinks from the unholy conflict ; the voice of the aged counsellor is drowned in the clamours of party; the meek and prayerful retire from the strife of tongues ; and the arena is left comparatively to men whose only object is to return blow for blow — men, whose element is a tempest, and their chief distinction that, like a certain bird of prey, they can fly only in a storm. The world meanwhile looks on amused ; the partisan heartens and cheers on his champion to the next onset; the unwary Christian spectator himself in- sensibly encourages and imbibes the factious spirit; and, in some instances, an individual who only meant to step between the hostile ranks as a mediator, has soon sided with a party, and joined in the fray. 154 MEANS PERPETUATING DIVISIONS, &c. While many periodical publications, conceived and commenced on Christian principles, have quickly dis- covered that their own friends mistook their freedom from passion for want of spirit; and, therefore, in order to maintain their ground, they inflame where they ought to have extinguished, and add to the conflagration of a temple already on fire. IX. And then the conduct of a large proportion of the religious public aggravates this evil considerably, by confining its reading and intercourse exclusively to its own party. If truth were preferred to triumph, men would remember that it is not the monopoly of a party ; and, on enlarging the sphere of their reading and observation, they would find so much to question where they had hitherto placed implicit confidence ; and so much to approve where they had previously bestowed all their suspicions and censures, that the evil complained of would in a great measure neu- tralise itself. Instead of this, however, they are content to hear faults imputed to others without any examination, and praise lavished on themselves with little qualification; until, having heard for years of nothing concerning their own party but its excellence, nor of their opponents but their errors and evils, it ceases to be wonderful that they should identify all goodness with the former, and feel as if the greatest virtue next to loving and applauding it, must consist in vilifying and opposing the latter. CHAPTER VI. TESTS OF THE SCHISMATICAL SPIRIT IN INDIVIDUALS AND IN CHURCHES. While the reader has been occupied, in the pages immediately preceding, in tracing the divisions of Christians, and the perpetuation of the evil, to their various causes, his mind, whether consciously or not, has no doubt occasionally applied the description to what he knows of himself, of the church to which he belongs, or of other churches from which he diflFers — and has drawn its conclusions of guilt or innocence accordingly. But supposing him to be daily impress- ed with the magnitude of the evil we deplore, he will not be satisfied with so vague and cursory an applica- tion of the subject ; he will be ready at once to insti- tute " great searchings of heart." Were Christians in general but to become adequately affected with the enormity of the evil, a loud and irresistible cry would be heard in every church, calling, not merely for individual scrutiny, but for the instant, impartial, and prayerful examination of each church in its col- 156 TESTS OF A SCHISMATICAL SPIRIT lective capacity. The announcement would go forth, " Blow ye the trumpet, sanctify a fast, call a solemn assembly," as if the trumpets of Sinai had convoked us together — as if he " who walks in the midst of the churches," had just despatched epistles to the " angels " of our respective communities — we should not merely " suffer," but invite the word of exhortation, and lay ourselves open to its searching influence. As if he himself had come down to conduct the solemn pro- cess of investigation, we should humbly invite him to ascend the seat of judgment, and say, " Search us, O God, and see what evil there is in us, and lead us in the way everlasting." And suppose that in compli- ance with our request he should actually assume the office; — as each church, in succession, came up for inspection ; as its history was slowly, patiently, and impartially brought to light; as its state, at pre- sent, passed under the eye of flaming fire ; and as the heart of each of its members was laid open and bare — what strange and unexpected disclosures would take place ! How many of our present subjects of congratulation and joy would prove to be reasons for humiliation and grief ! how many who have hitherto enjoyed the title of champions of the truth, would depart, branded as agents of strife and ringleaders of faction ! In many instances, the accuser would be seen taking the place of the accused ; and the sup- posed and compassionated victim of schism be de- nounced as its author. Terms of communion not IN INDIVIDUALS AND IN CHURCHES. 157 prescribed in the word of God — tests of discipleship devised by man — symbols of party, and badges of distinction — many of those things which the churches generally make their boast and their glory — would be denounced as the creatures of faction, and the causes of strife, where, otherwise, charity would have reigned in peace. 1. Such an investigation, however, is reserved for another day. Let us aim impartially to anticipate its awards, by sitting in judgment on ourselves noiv. In order to assist the reader in this important exercise, we would respectfully ask him, first, whether he has ever considered the possibility — we say the bare pos- sibility — of his being a schismatic ? or whether he is prepared to admit the possibility that the church to which he belongs may be in any degree amenable to the charge ? We are persuaded that many a Christian knows so little of the scriptural nature of schism, and has heard it charged so exclusively on parties to which he does not belong, that the idea of associating the sin with himself or his church, is almost as start- ling and difficult to him, as if the sin were theft or even murder. And yet the possibility we have de- scribed must be admitted by him, in order that the subject in its present stage may obtain an entrance into his mind. To this end, it will surely be suffi- cient to remind him that had he been a member of either of the most flourishing of the primitive churches, his liability to the evil in question would have been p 158 TESTS OF A SCHISMATICAL SPIRIT obviously implied in the cautions which the inspired epistles to those churches contain against it. He will find by a reference to the brief analysis of those epis- tles contained in our first section, that the churches of Ephesus, Philippi, and Thessalonica — the prime of the best — were anxiously admonished against all ap- proaches to unchristian divisions; as if the apostle would thus warn the Christians and churches of all subsequent times that they are not exempt from the same danger. " He that hath an ear to hear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches." 2. But if the evil be possible, it may also at one time and degree or another have been actual. The reader may almost take it for granted that the denomination to which he belongs has not escaped the charge of, at least, tending to schism, by those who differ from it ; and unless he knows the cha- racter of each, of all, the members who have ever belonged to it, some of them may have scattered the seeds of division ; and, unless he knows every incident of its history, some of those incidents may have tended to create dissension ; and, unless he could say how the constitution of his church would have struck him if he had never heard of it till to-day, or if he had been taught from infancy to prefer another constitution, some of the feelings which, in that case, the object of his present admiration might have justly excited, might have tended to keep him at a distance from it. IN INDIVIDUALS AND IN CHURCHES. 159 3. Has the reader, then, ever examined the con- stitution, history, and state of the church to which he belongs, by that standard by which all churches, and all their members will be finally judged — the word of God? Is he satisfied that were all books except this lost from the earth, his church would find its entire constitution sanctioned and supported by the facts and principles recorded there ? Does he belong to a class who persuade themselves that their church is perfect — that Infinite Perfection could not say to it, " I have somewhat against thee?" and if he does not, has he ever searched for the beam or the mote? does he deplore it? and is he ready to assist in casting it out ? 4. The schism of the church at Corinth did not respect its conduct towards other churches, but was confined to the members of its own little circle. Has the conduct of the reader ever tended to dis- turb the peace of the particular assembly with which he worships ? If, when an evil report has been pro- pagated concerning any of its members, he has im- properly lent himself to promote its circulation, " taking up a reproach against his neighbour" — if, when his personal accommodation has been involved, he has preferred his own ease to the peace of the society at large — if, when called to exercise his in- fluence in any of its arrangements and appointments, he has raised or encouraged a faction, saying, " I am of Paul, or, I am of ApoUos" — if, when a question 160 TESTS OF A SCHISMATICAL SPIRIT of precedence has arisen, he has shown that he " loveth to have the pre-eminence," and has angrily contended for it — if, when a real evil has called for excision, he has gone about it roughly and unfeel- ingly, instead of cutting it off as if it had been his own hand, or plucking it out as if it were his own eye — if, owing to superior endowments, or wealth, or office, he possesses influence, but demeans himself haughtily or arbitrarily, " lording it over God's heri- tage" — or if, comparatively destitute of influence, he be yet capricious, complaining, heady, and med- dling — in either of these cases, his conduct is cal- culated to reproduce the scenes which disgraced the church at Corinth; he is chargeable with having indulged a schismatical spirit. 5. Howe, in his sermons on "the Carnality of Re- ligious Contentions," enumerates the following indica- tions of such carnality : — when we make little account of the important things in which we agree, compared with the lesser things about which we differ — when we lay gi'eater stress than is needful on some unscrip- tural words in delivering scriptural doctrine — when we show too little indulgence to one another's mis- takes and misapplication of Scripture terms — when we are over- intent to mould and square the truths of the Gospel by human measures and models — when there is a discernible proneness to oppose the great things of the Gospel to one another, and to exalt and magnify one above or against another — when any IN INDIVIDUALS AND IN CHURCHES. 161 contend with unusual zeal for the sacredness or spirit- uality of a particular opinion, in order that under that pretence, they may indulge their carnal inclination with the greater liberty — when in maintaining a truth in opposition to others, we industriously pervert their meaning, and impute to them things they never say — when such disputes arise at length to wrath and angry strife — when we proceed to judge of the consciences and states of those from whom we diffei* — when we unduly exalt ourselves and seek to subjugate all to our standard — and when we discover a pleasure in having such disputes continued without any limit or rational design. 6. Though the reader may be guiltless in each of these respects, he may yet belong to a particular church, or a denomination, which exacts unscriptural conditions from those who seek communion with it; which excludes some whom Christ has received, and, perhaps, receives others whom Christ has not ac- cepted; which raises the mere lines of ecclesiastical demarcation into lofty ramparts on which to plant the artillery of an interminable conflict, and which thus presents an exclusive and repulsive aspect to every other part of the Christian community, — and, by silently conniving at these evils, he may be implicated in the guilt which they involve. Whatever the denomination of Christians to which the reader may belong, he can hardly look around without perceiving that there is one class of the p 3 162 TESTS OF A SCHISMATICAL SPIRIT Christian public more directly confronting his deno- mination than any other. Towards any of the others his feelings and conduct may not be unscriptural, but what is his temper towards that? Is he cool and dis- tant towards its members ? If he had fallen into Christian or friendly conversation with one of them as a stranger, would he become reserved towards him on discovering his denominational badge? Has he ever been conscious of impatience on listening to an account of their prosperity ? When repeating a re- port of their faults or disgraces, has the evil never been magnified in his hands ? Does he experience a pleasure in relating their inconsistencies, " rejoicing in iniquity," because it is their iniquity ? Would he complacently witness a course of conduct towards them, which he would deem improper and intolerant towards any other class? Has he on no occasion worshipped with them ; or, if he have, has he resolved that he never will again ? Would it be in vain for one of them to apply to him for pecuniary aid, even if the object to be aided bid fair to effect good of the highest kind ? Is he pleased at any measure which, by drawing his own party into closer compact, draws it proportionably off from them ? Is he most pleased with those champions of his party who assail them with the roughest violence ? And is he inclined to depreciate the less violent of his own party as neutral and tame? 7. The reader himself, perhaps, has appeared before IN INDIVIDUALS AND IN CHURCHES. 163 the public as the advocate of the denomiriational system to which he belongs, or of the particular state and relations in which his denomination at present stands. But every Christian is not called to this special task ; many have injured the cause they have espoused, by their rashness and incompetence. Was he more anxious to state the truth amiably, or smartly and pungently ? Did he think more of what the truth required of him, or of what was expected of him by his party ? Did he indite as if under their eye, and as if receiving already by anticipation the applause of being their champion ? And when that particular exercise ended, what was the new state of his mind towards the party opposed ? — one of increased, or of diminished concern for their welfare ? Did it leave him in the attitude of prayer or of pugnacity? — imploring the Spirit to lead them into all truth, or looking angrily around for an antagonist ? Did he from the first reflect whether or not he was called in the providence of God to enter on this particular course ? whether he could scripturally expect the Divine blessing on the act, and on his mode of pursuing it ? whether his leading incitement was personal reputation, a sanguine and irascible temper of mind, or the glory of God ? Was he ac- tuated by a profound reverence for the truth ? And did he vindicate the lofty claims of the truth only in the spirit of truth ; avoiding all that is inaccurate and partial in statement; unfair in argument; unkind in 164 TESTS OF A SCHISMATICAL SPIRIT animadversion ; contemptuous, and ungenerous in sentiment; flippant, sarcastic, and unjust in expres- sion ; and maintaining throughout a spirit of candour and impartiality ? Did he evince a due regard to the real extent of the differences in question ; not magni- fying a microscopic point of outward observance into a size which eclipsed the cross ; and which might lead one to infer that the neglecter of that point, and the blasphemer of that cross, were both on a level ? 8. There are certain ecclesiastical solvents, or moral tests, which it is hardly possible to apply with any degree of fairness to the subject before us, with- out detecting the schismatical or party-spirit, in what- ever proportions, or with whatever better combina- tions it may exist. The reader has occasionally heard of the usefulness of the parties who stand more directly opposed to him ; usefulness of a kind which is likely to furnish subjects for joy among the angels of God, and of high praise in eternity ; — has he heard of it with grudging, spoken of it with depre- ciation, or been sullenly silent concerning it both before God and man ? We read of Barnabas, that " when he was come, and had seen the grace of God," he, in circumstances far less favourable to gratitude, " was glad." And the only reasons assigned are, that " he was a good man, and full of the Holy Ghost." While, with a noble superiority to petty jealousies, and a supreme concern for the great cause of the Gospel, St. Paul writes, that though " some preach IN INDIVIDUALS AND IN CHURCHES. 165 Christ even of envy and strife. . . .not sincerely, supposing to add affliction to my bonds. . . .What then ?. . . .Christ is pi*eached ; and I therein do re- joice, yea, and will rejoice." Now, can the reader satisfactorily account for the sullen silence of which we have spoken, as contrasted with this Christian magnanimity, except on the ground of party-spirit ? He may have heard also of certain disgraces which those parties may have sustained, in the persons of some of their members, or in the failure of some of their plans ; and, in such cases, the Scripture enjoins him to weep with those that weep, and to cast the large mantle of Christian charity over their imperfections. If, however, in opposition to these injunctions, the reader looked, if not exult- ingly, at least complacently, on their failures and defects— if, so far from spreading the mantle of charity over them at the time, he even now occa- sionally takes off the veil which the more lenient hand of time has thrown over them, and calls atten- tion to them afresh — if, while he is blind to all the honours of their 'scutcheon, he is ever mindful of its blots — if he cares much less about the injury which the general cause of religion may sustain by his ex- hibition of their defects, than for the pleasure he seeks in their humiliation — hesitates little to wound religion, provided he can inflict the stab through their side — can he scripturally account for this con- duct except on the principle of a factious spirit ? 166 TESTS OF A SCHISMATICAL SPIRIT 9. While the reader very properly contends that there are doctrines which constitute the essence of Christianity; which characterise it as a si/stem, and make it what it is; and that all are capable of per- ceiving these doctrines, and bound to receive therfi ; he has no doubt also heard of those constitutional varieties of individual minds which naturally lead men to view the same object under different aspects — one, giving a preference to this outward modifi- cation of religion, and another to that ; yet both agreeing in the reception of essential truth. Now, if he often wonders at the obtuseness, and animad- verts on the perverseness, of those who thus diflPer from him in religion, without ever giving them the benefit of those obvious reflections ; if he never places himself, by a slight and very common effort of the imagination, in their circumstances, nor asks himself how much like them he should probably have been in their situation ; never makes allowances for the educational and other influences through which they have passed ; or, making these reflections, feels no remission of his displeasure towards them, how can he explain this inconsistency except by con- fessing to a bigoted spirit ? 10. The Bible enjoins, and no doubt the judg- ment of the reader assents to, the duty of prayer for all men. Perhaps he is ready to add that he performs this duty. But if there be a class of Christians for whom he could not easily bring him- IN INDIVIDUALS AND IN CHURCHES. 167 self to pray by name; if he only brings himself to comprehend them in his intercessions at all by concealing them (so to speak) among a multitude of other objects — by allowing them to pass under some term of vague generalisation — surely he does not deceive himself by supposing that he prays for them. Had the Jewish high-priest erased the name of one of the tribes from his breast-plate, and yet pleaded that he prayed for that tribe when he prayed for all Israel, could the mockery have passed ? And if the reader can thus carry a feeling of dislike towards those supposed into the presence of God — to the very throne of grace — if he can only advert to them there as if they were enemies — can pray specifically and cordially for unbelievers, while he is silent concern- ing them ; in what way can he account for his con- duct except by ascribing it to a sectarian spirit? 11. The cause of God is one, and his Church one. Every believer has his appropriate place in that one Church : and every instance of usefulness takes place in virtue of that one design of mercy. And you, reader, doubtless, profess to believe, whether formally or not, in the holy catholic church, and in the communion of saints. But if, instead of rising to the contem- plation of this great whole, your habitual conception of the Church is confined to your own party — if when that is languishing you feel as if the entire kingdom of God M'ere in a crisis, though, perhaps, every other section of the Church is flourishing — if 168 TESTS OF A SCHISMATICAL SPIRIT. by labouring in the vineyard, you mean labouring only in a party corner, and evince dislike at associating with the members of another party, even when the work to be done can be accomplished only by such association — in fine, if your best sympathies circulate only among those of your own denomination, how can you account for it or describe it, but as a sectarian spirit? If, as the result of these hints for self-examination, the reader should begin to suspect that he is per- sonally implicated in the subject, he will further evince his impartiality by considering the evils of schism. CHAPTER VII. THE GUILT AND EVILS OF SCHISM. Were men to be distributed according to the various opinions which they entertain concerning the moral nature of ecclesiastical divisions, they might be ranked in the following classes : — Those who look on every separation from themselves as schism, and who describe it in terms of laboured exaggeration. — Those who, considering themselves unjustly condemned for separation, have, in the consciousness of their own comparative innocence, come to undervalue the ex- ternal unity of the Church, and to speak of its divi- sions in terms of comparative extenuation. — Those who, confining their attention to the emulation and increased activity to which, by the overruling pro- vidence of God, some of those separations have led, have come to speak of division in terms of implied approbation. — And those who, taking their views from the word of God, regard those separations only as schism which violate the great law of Christian love ; Q 170 THE GUILT AND EVILS OF SCHISM. and those only as schismatics who either give or unnecessarily take occasion of separation ; viewing the guilt of such divisions as depending on circum- stances so various that God alone can determine its amount. But however different their estimate of schism, they all unite, in certain circumstances, in denouncing it as an evil. Only attempt to fasten the sin on those even who appear to hold it most lightly, and the manner in which they writhe under the charge, betrays how odious it becomes when turned into a personal imputation. In the same way, each party, in a time of angry division, has been eager to fasten the imputation on the other; thus evincing the general sense of its demerit, by the advantage they hoped to gain in casting it at their opponents. " In dealing about this business among Christians," writes Owen in his treatise on schism, " the advantage hath been extremely hitherto on their part who found it their interest to begin the charge. For whereas themselves perhaps were, and are of all men, most guilty of the crime, yet by their clamorous accusation, putting others on the defence of themselves, they have in a manner clearly escaped from the trial of their own guilt, and cast the issue of the question purely on them whom they have accused It is the manner of men of all persuasions who undertake to treat of schism, to make their entrance with in- vectives against the evils thereof, with aggravations THE GUILT AND EVILS OF SCHISM. 171 of its heinousness. All men, whether intending the charge of others, or their own acquitment, esteem themselves concerned to do so." But while schism is thus branded by universal consent, and while parties have been bandying the charge and criminating each other, anxious only on which the charge should finally settle, how insensible have they been to the fact that they were meanwhile familiarising themselves, in common, with the sin itself, drinking into its spirit, presenting to the world a spectacle of ridicule and reproach, and frustrating the very ends for which a Church has been instituted, and for which Christianity is continued on earth. " For how many sad centuries of years," writes Howe, " hath Christianity been at an amazing stand ! .... Is this the religion which so early, by its own native light and power conquered so many nations, and which we expect to be the religion of the world ? .... For thirteen or fourteen hundred years hath the Church been gradually growing a multiform, mangled, shattered, and most deformed thing ; broken and parceled into nobody knows how many several sorts of communions. . . . Carnality hath become, and long been in it, a governing principle, and hath torn It into God knows how many fragments and parties ; each of which will now be the Church, enclose itself within its own peculiar limits, claim and appropriate to itself the rights and privileges which belong to the Christian Church in common, yea, and even Christ 172 THE GUILT AND EVILS OF SCHISM. himself, as if he were to be so enclosed and confined : and hence it is said, Lo, here is Christ, or there he is, till he is scarce to be found any where ; but as, through merciful indulgence, overlooking our sinful follies, he is pleased to afford some tokens of his presence both here and there." In order that we may see and lament the wide- wasting evils of schism, we propose to consider the account given of them in the New Testament, to- gether with the fearful effects which it is at this moment producing on Christians individually, on the visible Church, and through these on the world at large. 1. 1. In the closing scenes of the Jewish economy, we see how the jealous spirit of party turns neigh- bouring temples into hostile fortresses, so that Zion and Gerizim stand frowning at each other ; and con- verts their respective worshippers into bitter foes, so that "the Jews have no dealings with the Samari- tans." It resents a slight constructive insult from an opposing party in the Church, more than an avowed assault from the world, and " calls down fire from heaven" to avenge it. It recognises no authority in the Church which is not countersigned with its own hand — will not allow a demon to be cast out by one " who follows not with us " — and in " haling to prison" those who venture to differ from it, " verily thinks that it is doing God service." 2. A spirit of contention and division is, in effect, a THE GUILT AND EVILS OF SCHISM. 173 repeal of the whole evangelical law. In six of the epistles it is affirmed, that " love is the fulfilling of the law." The law of love to God and man, which was proclaimed from Sinai, has been republished from Calvary, enforced by more appropriate and powerful motives, and constituted the grand practical charac- teristic of the Christian economy. But schism is the breach of Christian love, and consequently a violation of the whole Christian law. 3. It appears to have been the first sin which dis- turbed the peace of the Christian Church, as such. The sin of Ananias and Sapphira had been destructive only to themselves. But it is the terrible distinction of this sin that, besides injuring its originators and im- mediate instruments, it tends to waste and destroy the community. Such was its tendency in the church at Antioch. Acts xv. 4. It not only disturbed the peace, but threatened the existence of several of the apostolic churches. Hence, the immediate occasion of many of the in- spired epistles ; and the deep, earnest, and even ago- nising solicitude which they express for the restora- tion of unity and peace. If believers constitute a living temple, this is the spirit which " defiles the temple of God;" profaning the sanctity, and dimming the glory of the whole edifice. Well, therefore, may it be added concerning the author of such sacrilege, " him will God destroy." 5. It displaced the great central doctrine of justifi- Q 3 174 THE GUILT AND EVILS OF SCHISM. cation by faith, by fixing the attention on points of ceremonial observance. It led numbers to moot " un- learned questions" and "gender strifes," in the very presence of the cross ; as, in the third and fourth cen- turies, it induced men curiously to "anatomise the person of Christ," when they should have been pros- trate before him in adoration. Hence, the chief ob- ject of some of the epistles was to recall the minds of those primarily addressed to that only ground of our acceptance with God — the mediation of Christ. Phil, iii. 1—8. 6. The scriptural classification of this sin illustrates its vile and aggravated nature, for it stands associated, both in its origin and tendencies, with many of the principal sins. 1 Cor. iii. 3; 2 Cor. xii. 20; Gal. v. 15 — 21. Here, its origin is imputed to carnality, to the lusts of the flesh, to the predominance of the sinful and worldly over the renewed and spiritual part of our nature; many of the baser passions are found in its company, either as its offspring or congenial asso- ciates ; and it is represented as degrading its victims, in some respects, below the mere level of humanity, into beasts of prey, who return bite for bite, and are " consumed one of another." 7. It often amounts to a virtual usurpation of the throne of Christ, and of his highest prerogative as Lord of conscience. Rom. xiv. ; James iv. 11. According to these scriptures, among the highest rights which Christ has acquired by his sacrificial death, are those 8 THE GUILT AND EVILS OF SCHISM. 175 which relate to the conscience, so that to attempt to impose our appointments on the conscience of an- other, or to denounce him for not subordinating his conscience to ours, is to ascend the tribunal, displace the Saviour, put on the brightest of his many crowns, and tyrannise where he should reign — an invasion of his throne which he will not fail to resent. 8. That such a spirit must be incompatible with fel- lowship with God is evident, for " he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?" 1 John ii. 9 — 11, and chap- ters iii. iv. It grieves, and repels from it " the Holy Spirit of God," Eph. iv. 30—32 ; and takes as its appropriate agents and associates, such as " cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine" of the cross. Rom. xvi. 17, 18; 1 Tim. vi. 4, 5; Titus i. 10. 9. It acts hypocritically, imposing an outward rite under a pretence that it is aiming solely at the ho- nour of God and the good of men, declaring that without it " they cannot be saved." Acts xv. 1. But at the same time throws off restraint, and indulges itself in the violated name of Christian liberty, and at the costly price of a wounded conscience in a weaker brother. Rom. xiv. 13, 15, 20, 21. 10. Among the recorded acts of the schismatical spirit are, indecorum in the public worship of God, 1 Cor. xi. 18 ; the formation of factions among the worshippers, 1 Cor. iii. 4 ; the reckless profanation of 176 THE GUILT AND EVILS OF SCHISM. the Lord's-supper, 1 Cor. xi. 20 — 22; and the con- sequent rending of the body of Christ. Chap. xii. Thus, in the extremity of its rage, it forbears nothing, however sacred, and is awed by nothing, however dreadful. Gratified it will and must be, though Christ should be present, and his table be the scene of profanation. Accompanied by all the male- volent passions — a flock of harpies and vultures — it fiercely descends upon the sacred feast, pollutes and preys on consecrated things, lacerating even " the members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones." 11. Bent on the gratification of its ravenous appe- tite, it hesitates not to " destroy with its meat one for whom Christ died," Rom. xiv. 15 — to devour im- mortal souls. But well may our surprise at its enor- mities cease, when we learn, Rom. xvi. 18 — 20, that Satan, the author of sin and prime disturber of the universe, is the parent of schism in the Church. En- tering the sacred enclosure — the paradise of the new creation — he early sowed the seeds of dissension, and effected " another fall of man." Aware that the conversion of the world is suspended on the unity of the Church, he leaves no means untried, and no agency unemployed, which is likely, by embroiling the Church, to frustrate its design, and to prolong his possession of the world. While, by the same means, the Church has often been rendered an easy conquest to the world : and, short of this, has furnished it with THE GUILT AND EVILS OF SCHISM. 177 sport, and even awakened emotions mingled with pity and contempt. But though schism was included in that mystery of iniquity, of which the apostles, even in their day, could say, it "doth already work;" it was reserved for subsequent times to behold the great engine of evil in full operation. Some, even then, were " doting about questions" — sick with them — exhibit- ing symptoms of the wrangling disease ;* but it re- mained for recent times for a man to write — and to acquire immortality by the sentence — "the itch of disputing has become the disease of the Church."f II. 1. As to the professor of Christianity, the evil in question operates to his personal injury in various ways. " Upon the religious intellect, sectarian feelings and fellowship," says Dr. Mason, " produce an effect analogous to that of the division of labour upon mechanical ingenuity. By concentrating its opera- tions in a few points, or perhaps in a single one, they render it peculiarly acute and discriminating within those limits, at the expense of enfeebling or destroying its general power. Conversations are cherished, books are read, time expended, faculties employed, not for the purpose of acquiring larger views of the Redeemer's truth, grace, kingdom, and * Bishop Wilkins's Sermons. t The well known epitaph of Sir H. Wotton in the college at Eton — " Hie jacet primus hujus sententise auctor — Disputandi pru- ritus fit ecclesia scabies." 178 THE GUILT AND EVILS OF SCHISM. glory : but for the purpose of training more accurate disputants upon the heads of sectarian collision. Here men distinguish themselves ; here they shine ; here they gratify their vanity, which they often mistake for conscience With one the watch- word is, our excellent, our apostolical Church — with another, the doctrine of baptism — with a third, the solemn league and covenant — with a fourth, the divine right of presbytery — with a fifth, the unparalleled con- stitution of Methodism — with a sixth, the scriptural Church order of the Independents." 2. " Nor does the practical judgment suffer less than the religious intellect. This is clearly seen in the estimate which animated sectarians form of character. The good qualities of their own adherent they readily perceive, admire, and extol ; his failings they endure with patience ; and his faults, which they dare not justify, they can overlook and extenuate. But should he quit their connexion, the first are disparaged, the second are no longer tolerable, and the third swell into crimes. On the other hand, virtues and graces in a different party, they are apt to admit with reluctance, and rarely without qualifi- cation But lo ! all is altered ! Our breasts fill with the milk of human kindness ; and we welcome to our hearts the very man whom a week before we eyed askaunt, and should have thought to have been a spot in our feast of charity. Nay, we often are summarily convinced, that a person of THE GUILT AND EVILS OF SCHISM. 179 dubious character has been injured and persecuted. Our inquiries are conducted with the nicest deHcacy. So gentle our temper ! so charitable our construc- tions ! so large an allowance for infirmity ! so deep our sympathy ! Whence the miracle ? Has a seraph, with fire from the altar of God, touched these men of unclean lips, and taken away the stains which alarmed our purity ? Oh no ! they are pre- cisely what they were. Wherefore, then, this change in eyesight, in feelings, in behaviour? Simple inquirer, thou knowest nothing of party magic! They have come, or are coming, or are expected to come, over to us." 3. The necessary effect of the two preceding evils is to impair our piety. The appointed channel in which religion flows is, through the understanding, to the heart. And hence it has often occurred that men in finding religion, have found a mind. But while piety, by bringing them into the presence of great and ennobling objects, has enlai'ged and exalted the little mind, the sectarian spirit, by detaining men chiefly among trifles, tends to dwarf and shrivel the most expansive intellect — to reduce it to the dimen- sions of the object on which it settles, a point. And thus, it not only contracts the understanding, and prevents the full flow of religious influence to the heart; it actually degrades and devotes the under- standing to other and inferior purposes, so that the heart is left in an unwatered, barren, withered state. 180 THE GUILT AND EVILS OF SCHISM. When the worshipper should be looking gratefully and complacently over the assembled church, he is prying about curiously for the marked members of his own sect, and thinks the temple empty because they are so few. And when he should be within, lost in the radiance of the Holiest of all, he is to be found without, in some dim and distant corner of the build- ing, angrily disputing with a fellow-worshipper about the most approved attitude of devotion. 4. Nor can this injury be inflicted on his piety without proportionally diminishing his enjoyment. The blessed God has so laid his vast and gracious plans that he can be enjoyed fully only in communion; and hence the consummation of spiritual happiness is reserved for the complete assembly of heaven. It follows, however, that the nearer the Church approaches at present to that final and full commu- nion, the nearer it will approach to that final and full enjoyment. But to this consummation the spirit of party presents an insuperable obstacle. By dividing the Church into unfriendly sections, it divides its joys and multiplies its sorrows. Instead of rejoicing in the prosperity of the whole Church, its victim can rejoice heartily only in the success of his own party. His God is, properly speaking, not the God of the whole Church, but only the patron of a party. And when, like the great Intercessor above, he might be enjoying the godlike satisfaction of taking the interests of the whole Church into the THE GUILT AND EVILS OF SCHISM. 181 presence of God, his breastplate contains the name of only one of the tribes — he is only the advocate of a paity. 5. From this it follows that a spirit of division tends to destroy " a sense of our common interests." Although Christ, as " the head of his body the Church," designs the health and growth of the whole, the hand is unnaturally pleased at arrest- ing and appropriating the nourishment which be- longs to the foot, and the right side congratulates itself at the paralysis of the left, as promising it a monopoly of the circulating life. My church, your church, their church, are phrases so prevalent, that His universal Church, which comprehends them all, is comparatively forgotten. No united prayers, no joint endeavours are made for a common good. Less pecuniary assistance is rendered, by the wealthy Christian, to religious objects coming from different parties, than as if they all belonged to his own party. And even complacency is felt at accessions to his own sect, though obtained at the expense of all the rest; forgetting that the injury of one member is the injury of the whole body. 6. Losing sight of the common interests of the Christian Church, each party appoints terms of com- munion with itself which disparage and virtually re- peal the bond of scriptural union. It is not enough that a man exercise "repentance towards God, and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ" — if he would obtain R 182 THE GUILT AND EVILS OF SCHISM. admission into a party church, he must pronounce the Shibboleth of its members. In addition to bein