OF THE Memphis CoiiTeiitloii ASSEMBLED OCT. 23, 1849. 5 1850, PRINTED AT THE MEMPHIS ENQUIRER OFFJCEi iWi I&Ó0 M 5 MINUTES ANE PROCEEDINGS of the MEMPHIS CONVENTION, AsseinMed. Octol^er 23, 1§19« October 23d, 1849. The Convention was called to order by Dr. Thomas Fearn, of Alabama, who nominated Col. Absalom Fowler, of Arkansas, as Chairman pro tt m. On motion of Gen. Isaac N. Davis, of Mississippi, Messrs. Alexander H. Arthur, of Vicksburg, E. J. Carrell and H. Van Pelt, of Memphis, we^e appintecl ►Secretaries. Prayer by the Right Reverend Bishop Otey, D. D., of Ten¬ nessee. On motion of Col. Stuart, of Alabama, it was resolved that th? several States be calleii in their ai|>iàabeiical order to file with the Secretaries lists of the names of their respective deB egates. The following lists of delegates were presented by the sev¬ eral members of thg committee: ALABAMA. Nicholas Davis, Nicholas Davis, Jr., C. C. Clay. Dr. Thomas Fearn, Samuel Ragland, Gen. IVI. B. Lowe,Tsham H. Fennel, John W. Clay, A. E. Mills, A» M. Hopkins, G. T. Jones, J. B. Jordan, S. D. Weakley, R. W. Walker, James Key, Isaac Love, S. J. Ragland, Jr., P. J. Watk ins, A. A. Burleson, Alexander Pattison, Jr.. Walker Reynolds, W. B. McClellan, J. A. Camp¬ bell, Charles LeBaron, F. L. Owen, G. N. Stewart, Thomas B. Wil Ib'on, Robert Leachman, Thomas H. Herndon. ARKANSAS. John F Wheeler, Benj T Duval, Sol F Clark, Geo W Clark, Thos M Collins, R T Redmond; W D Ferguson, Thos H Brad¬ ley, A J Bell, W H Gaines, John Brown, Thos S Dre^^, T B Flournoy, Wm Byers, John Kirkwood, John Minnikin)^''Wm Magulre, Robert McCreighi, Dr Smith.'f hos T Tunstall, James Krunrin, Sam G Roane, i hos S James, Benj Harris, J P Murdis, Jesse V Cross, James Stotts, Isaac Fulsom, Jas Davidson, Jas Irwin, Joseph Evans, W F Aloore, E Burke. Wm C Myrtle, J H Hicks, Q K Underwood, J W Pope,John S Horner, W R 2 Ni c í I Sebastian, Wm H. Ringo, T S M King, John Ferrig, David C. Cross, D B Greer, A Pike, A Fowler, R Searcy, L J Reardon, L R Lincoln, Wm E Ashley, W W Adams, Benj Danley, D J Baldwin, G C Watkins» J S Hoane, F Smithson, G B Hayden, George Waring, P L Anthony, C C Danley, D W Carroll, R Fletcher, E H Fletcher, Thos B Craighead, Thos J Blakemore, Dr Jordon, Thos H Pinsell, Abijah Allen, Edwin C Raskins, Colbert Caldwell, G B Michey, J F Ayres, Decatur Hill, Solon ^Borland, Peter G Rives, Rhea Wallace, R P Talley, J W More- land, J G Lpvejoy, Wm Williams, James M Grandy. LOUISIANA. Jno M Bell, Maunsel White, Jno C Laru, M M Cohen, S G Reed, JÍfe, A Walker, W L BIcKnight, J D B DeBow, William Walker, R J Ward, Prof. C J Forshey, James A Lusk. MISSISSIPPI. H W Walter, R S Lucas', W F Mason, John A Sims, T W Oliver, E Greer, J C Holland, E P Govan, L Sims, tl E Wil¬ liamson, Henry Greei', Wm S Tay loi, John P Pry or, H Thorn¬ ton, N W Williams, I) Minor, J L) Martin, J W Chalmers,Thos Trimble, J W Clapp, Wm B Hampden, H Harris, Gasper Jones, B N Alexander, J H Alexander, C J Bowen, Geo W Gill, Wm A Hancock, C W Bowtrn, B L Milam, Felix Labouve, J C Thompson, Thos White, L L Marshall, Dr W W Tucker, A W Jones, H S King, A K Miller, H Dill, R D Browning, Thos M Jones, R B Brown, Dr W Westbrooks, W H Johnson, A G Kerr, Dr W DEllis, W W Wain, Dr R D Taggert, R S King, R Whitby, J D Fennel, Joseph G Hall, Shelton Oliver, Andrew Matthews, John P Wallace, Samuel W Evans, W M Farley, Dr Phillips, Geo R Hunt, John Robertson, J D RuiBn, Wm B Dickins, R M Farley, R Cianton, S N Hawkins, E T McGehee, D J White, F M White, Wm P Brooks, R W Brahan, John Boy err R H Ri vers, J M Clark, John Thompson, J F Cushman, J Ñ Davis, Will Webb, P B Barringer, H H Lee, Wm F Avant, Jos Wileox, J S Yerger, W L Robards, R H Boone, Lewis Lawshe, ThosCarbry, R H Stokes, J N Harper, W C Falkner, G Davis, H Lightman, S R Speight, W J K Rucker, H P Max¬ well, A G Weir, Chas McLarin, Alexander H Arthur, Geo W Duke, H B Dandridge, John Grant, W N Raines. TENNESSEE. Land?r(inle—Sam Oldham, John J Nelson, J T Jett, Isaac M Steele, R H Oldham, Davíd Gilleland, J H Boram. i Wtakley—P B Bell, Sam Irvine, R W Gardner, S D Beloate, ^ D Gard well. Gibson—J A Taliaferro, W W Lea, A S Claiborne, L P Seay, J MSharpe, J Richardson, J C Gillespie, L C Levy, F Parker. FoyHk—W B Jones, Lewis P Williamson, F W Mayo, Hugh Davis, H J Cannon, Ed Winston, Howell A Taylor, J R Mosby, A F Tucker, J ^ PuUlarn, i Mnmxí OF 4pril 19 iftsi 3 Davidson—k V Brown, Willo Williams, John M Bass, E H Hickman, Randal McGavock, John Orerton, John Thompson. Sh Iby-—H G Smith, R Topp, S Bond, F P Stanton, D Loo- ney, 1>. M Leaîherman, L H Coe, James Penn, R C Brinkley, W B Morris, J C Jones, EM Yerger, John Pope, Le Roy Pope, W T Brown, A S Greer, P G Gaines, Joseph I Andrews, G L Holmes, W Byrd Powell, WB Miller, John Trigg, S P Walker, JM M Cornelius, Chas D McLean, B Wright, A F McKinley, E W Kenny, Joseph Wright, E F Watkins, L Henderson, T S Ayres, A B Warford, M Owen, J F Farriiigton, W V Taylor, G W Smith, E Hickman, J Fowlkes, W Lundy, W Armour, Et Banks, E J Carrell, Jno Delafield, L Shanks, W A Blythe, F Titus, S S Rembert, J F Brown, J R Redford, J T Trezevant, E H Porter, J G Bostick. Hardeman—T J Neely, W Ferguson, D Wells, M W^Guy, J S Malone, John C Green, John Hunt, C W Hunt. Tipton—W Coward, D R Whitley, Jas J Alston. Maury—ajames Walker. Williamson—Dr Wm S Webb, J P Maury, W P Cannon, Jno S Claybrook, C McEwing. Madison—W B Butler, A Debery, J Merriweather, R Finner, J W Campbell, R H Hart, W H Long. Haywood—W B Macklin, N Adams, F A Edners. Hawkins—S D Mitchell. KENTUCKY. Benj Edwards Gray, Will Campbell, W M Campbell, T F J Trabue, Henry J Eastin, Edward J Bulloch, Hamilton Smith. MISSOURI. JasB Bowlin, J Loughborough, Adolph Paul, Chas C Whit- telsy, Thomas Howell, J K McCabe, John Miller, J A Rodgers, N A Speer, Ash ton Johnson, Abraham Fenley, Jr., J R Stroth¬ er, TÇ^ Risk. TEXAS. Ashbel Smith, A J Yates, James N Smith, R M Lindsay, E W Upshaw, Chas C Mills, W A Boyd, Stephen H Ellis. ILLINOIS. Wm M Hall, James Williams. PENNSYLVANIA. Joseph H Thompson, F H French, John Nelson Smith, Geo Darsie,Chas Naylor. MASSACHUSETTS. H W White, W F Pratt. NEW YORK. Lester L Robinson. VIRGINIA. Lt. M F Maury, of Washington City, J T Trezevant of Mem¬ phis, acting for Virginia by proxy, and 'J E Leigh, acting as 4 delegates from Virginia, by request and authority of the Town Council of Petersburg. SOUTH CAROLINA. JPG Mittag, R P W Allston, D P Jamison, J A Wood¬ ward, Samuel Cordes, C A Price, CharlesG Wagner. GEORGIA. Dr D Jameison. On motion of Mr. Eastin, ot Kentucky, a committee of one member from each delegation was appointed by the respective delegations, to select officers to preside over the Convention, whereupon the following gentlemen were appointed: Alabama, Hon. Nicholas Davis; xirkansas, Hon. W. K. Se¬ bastian; Georgia, Dr. David Jameson; Illinois, James Williams; Kentucky, Edward J. Bullock; Louisiana, John M. Bell; Mis¬ souri, Hon. J. B. Bowlin; Mississippi, Gen. Isaac N. Davis; New York, Lester L. Robinson; Pennsylvania, Frederick K. French; South Carolina, Gen. D. P. Jamison; Texas. Col. C. C.Mills; Tennessee, Hon. James C. Jones; Virginia, Junius E Leigh. On motion, the Conv^tion adjourned till 4 o'clock, P.M. The Convention met pursuant to adjournment. Col. Nicholas Davis, of Alabama, chairman of the Committee on Organization, reported the following officers: FOR PRESIDENT, Lieut. M. F. MAUiiY, of Washington City. FOR VICE PRESIDENTS, Gov, C. C. Clay, of Alabama; W. F. MasoiY, of Mississippi; WiLLOUGHBY WiLLîAMS, of Tenncssec; Col. R. F. W. Ai ,sTON, of South Carolina; Dr. D. J AMtisoN, of Georgia; Col. Matjnsel White, of l.ouisiana; Gov. Thomas S. Dhew, of Arkansas; Ashbeix Smith, of Texas; Ashton Johssox, of IMiïSouri; W. M. Hale, of Illinois ; Col. Benjamin E. Gray, of Kentucky; Col. John T. Trezevakt, of Virginia: Joseph H. Thompson, of Pennsylvania; L. L. Robinson, of New York. for secretaries, Richard W. Walker, of Alabama; Alexander H. Arthur, of Mississippi; E. J. Carrell, of Tennessee; C. A. Price, of South Carolina; Alexander Walker, of Louisiana; iambert J. Reardon, of Arkansas; Edward W Upshaw, of Texas; Abraham Fenley, Jr., of Missouri, H. J. Eastin, of Kentucky. The report of the committee was unanimously adopted. On motion of Mr. Yates, of Texas, it was resolved, that each delegation to this convention appoint one from its members to constitute a committee who shall prepare and report to this body the rules to govern it in the conduct of its business, and prescribe the manner in which the vote shall be taken. On motion of Mr. DeBow, the convention took a recess of fifteen minutes, to enable the several delegations to select their committee, when the following gentlemen were announced as the committee: Alabama, J. A. Campbell; Arkansas, G. C. Watkins; Georgia, Dr. Jameson; Illinois, Wm. M. Hall; Kentucky, E. J. Bullock; Louisiana, J. D. B. DeBow; Missouri, C. C. Whittelsey; Missis¬ sippi, J. W. Chalmers; New York, L.L.Robinson; Pennsylva¬ nia, George Darsie; South Carolina, J. F. G. Mittag; Texas, A. J. Yates, Tennessee, F. P. Stanton; Virginia, Junius E. Leigh; Which report was received and adopted. On motion of Judge Chalmers, of Mississippi, it was resolved, that the thanks of this Convention be tendered to Col. Absalom Fowler, of Arkansas, for the efficient and impartial manner in which he has discharged the duties devolving upon iiim as {Re¬ siding officer pro fem. The Cofivention then adjourned until 9 o'clock Wednesday morning. Wednesdav, October 24th, 1849. The Convention met pursuant to adjournment; opened by prayer from the Rev. Mr, Weatherby, from Mississippi. The committee to report Rules and Regulations for the gov¬ ernance of the Convention, begged the adoption of the follow¬ ing report, which was concurred in: The committee appointed to prepare Rules for this Conven¬ tion and to prescribe the manner in which the vote should be taken, beg leave respectfully to report the following resolution which they recommend to the adoption of the Convention: Resohrd, That this Convention shall be governed in the con¬ duct of its business by the rules of the House of Representatives of the United States, as adopted during the last Congress, so far as the same shall be applicable to the proceedings of this body, with the following resolution, to wit: When a division upon any question shall be demanded by the 6 delegation from any State, the vote shall be taken by States, and each State shall be entitled to one vote. E. J. Bullock, Kentucky, J. D. B. DeBow, Louisiana, C. C. Whittlesey, Missouri, J, W. Chalmers, Mississippi, L. L. Robinson, New York, F, P. Stanton, Tennessee, I. A. Campbell, Alabama, E. C. VVatkins, Arkansas, D.'Jamison, Georgia, W..M. Hall, Illinois, Commiltee* Mr. H.G. Smith, of Memphis, offered the following resolution, which was adopted: Resolverff That a committee be appointed to consist of two persons from each State and Territory represented in this Con¬ vention, said persons to be selected by the delegations, to con¬ sider and report upon the subject of establishing a Rail Road which shall connect the valley of the Mississippi with the Pa¬ cific Ocean, and the proper mode by which such road can be certainly and speedily accomplished ' Mr. Danby of Arkansas, moved that the Convention take a recess to enalle the several delegations to elect their committee men, and that each State delegation select one of its members to represent said States in voting on questions presented to the Convention; all of which was agreed to, and the Convention took a recess of fifteen minutes. The Convention re-assembled, when the following gentlemen were reported by the delegations to act for the several States* Committee on Resohitions—Tennessee, J. C. Jones and H. G. Smith; Kentucky, Benj. E. Gray and M. J. Bullock; Missouri, J. Loughborough and T. F. Risk; Illinois, W. M. Hall, and Jas. Williams; Arkansas, W. K. Sebastian and Dr. J. Kirkwood; Mississippi, Jï W^. Chalmers and J. Yerger; Louisiana, M. M. Cohen and J. C. Larue; Texas, C. C. Mills and A. J. Yates; Georgia, Dr. D. Jamison; South Carolina, D. F. Jamison and J. F. G. Mittag; Virginia, J. E. Leigh and J. T. Trezevant; Pennsylvania, Geo. Darsie and Charles Naylor; New York, L. L. Robinson; Alabama, Thos. Fearn and J. A. Campbell. And the folfowing was announced as the committee of one from each State to cast the vote of the State: Tennessee, John Pope; Kentucky, E. J. Bullock; Missouri, J. B. Bowlin; Illinois, VV. M. Hall; Arkansas, Solon Bv)rland; Mississippi, John D. Martin; Louisiana, Samuel C. Reid, Jr.; Texas, R. Jj. Lindsy; Georgia, Dr. D. Jamison; Alabama, Col. N. Davis; South Carolina, J. A. Woodward; Virginia, J. E. Leigh; Pennsylvania, J. N. Smith; New York, L. L. Robinson. On motion of Mr. Leigh, of Virginia, the President of this Convention was added to the Committee on Resolutions. On motion of Mr, Campbell, of Alabama, the committee from the St. Louis Convention were invited to make their report and present their delegation; whereupon Mr. Loughborough, of 7 Missouri, addressed the Convention, and reported the Resolu¬ tions and Address, as follows: Mr. Presidejkt: The National Convention recently assembled in St. Louis have deputed us to meet you here to-day, and to say to you that, cordially concurring in the general object for the accomplishment of which you are assembled, they greet you as fiiends, brethren and co-laborers, and sincerely trust that your counsels may be guided by wisdom and moderation, and your resolutions characterized by dignity, discretion and pa¬ triotism. At an early period during the past spring the people of the City of St. Louis—deeply impressed with the magnitude and importance of a railway from the valley of the Mississippi to the shores of the Pacific—assembled themselves in mass meeting to take into consideration the means of concentrating the public opinion, and determining the public will of the people of the United States, in favor of this grand design. In that meeting they resolved that a national convention consisting of delegates from all the States of the Union should be invited to assemble there on the 15th of the ensuing October. At the same time they re¬ solved that the project of a Pacific railway was a work purely national in character, and that in its construction the senti¬ ments and interests of every section of the Union ought to be fairly considered. » Acting^^in accordance with the spirit of this masnanimous resolution, the committee who were appointed to frame an ad¬ dress to the people of the United States, and to take the need¬ ful steps towards the assembling of said convention, did, in that address, and by their correspendence, endeavor to elevate this great project above the strifes of faction and party,-—the jealousies of sectional and local interests, and beyond the con¬ trol of personal ambition . The general committee of St. Louis also, through one of its sub-committees, laid before the conven¬ tion when it assembled, a plan for a Pacific railway which they deemed freé from constitutional difficulty, and just and nation¬ al in character. The convention which assembled in response to the invita¬ tion of the people of St. Louis, after ample discussion and ma¬ ture deliberation, unanimously concurred in the following re¬ solution: Reso'ved, That this convention is in its spirit and object strictly national, having no party, no sectional, no local inter¬ ests to serve, or promote, but having at heart the interest of the whole country. After the passage of this resolution, and on motion of Mr. Thompson, of Indiana, who enforced his views by an able and eloquent address, the convention unanimously agreed to the following resolutions: Resolvedt That in the opinion of this convention, it is the du- 8 ty of the General Government to provide at an early period for the construction of a central national railroad from the valley of the Mississippi to the Pacific Ocean. Resolvpcly That in the opinion of this convention, a grand trunk railroad, with branches to St. Louis, Memphis and Chi¬ cago, would be such a central and national one. Resolved^ That a committee bö appointed to communicate to the convention to be held at Memphis the foregoing resolutions and to request the concurrence, of said convention therein. After the adoptian of these resolutions, some doubts having been expressed as to the degree of constitutional authority in the General Government recognised by them, the delegate Irom the State of Indiana by whom they were introduced, gave the following written explanation, which was entered of record as contituting a part of the procer dings of the convention: "Mr. Thompson, of Indiaua, in explanation of the second re¬ solution oflTered by him on yesterday, and adopted by the con¬ vention, said—that in preparing that resolution it was his es¬ pecial and earnest design so to frame it as to express no opin¬ ion on the question of the power of the General Government over internal improvements within the States; neither to affirm or disaffirm that power. His sole object by avoiding that question was to present to the convention a proposition upon which every member of the convention, of whatever political party, might stand in perfect union and harmony. He intend¬ ed simply to assert that the General Government had power to construct the main trunk of the road, and that the question as to the manner of constructing the branches—whether by the donation of lands or by the States themselves—should be left open for the final determination bf Congress. He hoped this explanation of his motives would satisfy every gentleman of the convention, and that we should be enabled to adjourn in the midst of the harmony and good feeling which now prevailed." Mr. President, the committee, of which I have the honor to be the chairman, have been deputed to lay before you the facts and proceedings as they transpired in the national convention recently assembled at St. Louis, and to request your concur¬ rence in the resolutions there adopted. Profoundly impressed with the importance of preserving en¬ tire harmony and concert of action in the whole of the Missis¬ sippi valley in reference to this great subject, it is our duty, as well as our desire, to refrain from the introduction or discussion of details, about which, in the present state of our knowledge, we are sensible there must be great diversity of opinion. What¬ ever we of the west do, we should do calmly, deliberately and harmoniously; because our brethren of the east look to us alone for the means of forming their opinions. If our proceedings shall be marked by wisdom and prudence, there is but little danger that what we shall resolve will be unsettled by similar 9 conventions in the east, or pass unheeded by the Congress of the Union. We have had sad experience at St. Louis of the folly and danger of awakening discussions which, in their nature, must be productive of strifes and divisions, and cannot conduce to any good or practical result. We shall, therefore, scrupulously re¬ frain from awakening them here. The resolutions which we have now the honor to lay before you, we honestly believe, if faithfully carried out by the Congress of the Union, will event¬ uate in the construction of a railway to the Pacific, which will •f ' confer fair and equal benefits upon every section of the Union; and so believing, we entreat you by the ties of a common in¬ terest, and a common feeling of brotherhood, to concur in them, and present to the balance of the Union an undivided front. In the unfeigned and fervent hope that such will be the re¬ sult of your deliberations, the National Convention at St. Louis unanimously passed the following resolution; Resolved^ That when this convention adjourns it will adjourn to re-assemble in the City of Philadelphia on the first Monday of April next—that we hereby invite our brethren who will assemble at the City of Memphis on Tuesday next to adopt a similar resolution,—and that the committee upon an address to the people of the United States, be hereby instructed to appeal to every State, county, city and town of the whole confederacy to send up a delegation, to give expression to the will of the whole American people. In conclusion, Mr. President, permit me through you to lay before the convention a communication from the Hon. R. W. Thompson, of Indiana, the author of the resolutions which we are commissioned to communicate. Private engagements of a pressing character have compelled him to forego the pleasure of meeting you here. ^*St. Louis, 19th October, 1849. ''Gentlemen: I had indulged the hope that circumstances would have permitted me to accept the invitation with which you have honored me, to be present at the National Railroad Convention, to be held in your city on the 23d inst. It would be especially agreeable to me now to do so, in view of the fact, that the convention just adjourned in this city has placed me on a committee, charged with thé duty of presenting to the Memphis Convention, for its concurrence, resolutions of an im¬ portant character. Indispensable busine^ís engagements, how¬ ever, require my immediate return home, and place it out of my power to be present. "I trust, gentlemen, that the deliberations of your convention will be equally harmonious with those of the St. Louis Conven^ tioD, and that you may find in the resolutions adopted here, a just and fair ground of compromise between conflicting local interests, upon which all of us can unite. If so, I shal} not suf- 2 10 fer myself to doubt the ultimate success of the great enterprise which it Is our common interest to adv^ance;—an enterprise worthy of the age and of the genius of the American people. In such an union of interests as is proposed by the resolutions ol the St. Louis Convention, we shall alone find strength enough to elevate this question above the partisan controversies of the day, and secure its certain triumph. Without this union, all our efforts will result in fruitless and unavailing controversy. "Including that supposed to have been recently discovered by Col. Fremont, across the Rocky Mountains, about the sour¬ ces of the Rio Grande, there are now/oitr routes proposed for a railroad to the Pacific. Standing alone, either of these routes will likely meet with objection, for the want oï nationality. But if it shall be agreed to construct one 'Great Central Railroad Highway,' it is by no means likely, that there will be success¬ ful or even formidable opposition to it from any quarter. It does not matter so much where the main trunk of this highway shall run or terminate, if it shall be found practicable so to build it, that it may be accessible to every section of the Union. Whether it shall cross the Rocky Mountains at the 'South Pass,'—at the 'Pass' mentioned in Col. Fremont's late letter to Col. Benton, or shall pursue the line surveyed by Lieut. Cook, south of the Gila River, is a matter of inferior moment, com¬ pared with the great object to be accomplished. We want, as yea have properly said, a ^Great Central Railroar] Highway.^ If this is not found to be practicable upon one of the proposed lines, it will doubtless be so upon another, or upon some route hereafter to be discovered. If a proper spirit of moderation shall characterize the proceedings of those who advocate these lines, and we shall be willing to yield somewhat of our local preferences for the common good, there wi!l be no difficulty in constructing such a road as is contemplated by the St. Louis resolutions,—a road having the eastern terminus of its main trunk at some central point upon our frontier. From this ter¬ minus, every portion of the United States may be reached by roads already projected and in progress of construction by State authorities and individual enterprise. When this is done, we shall have a great system, which will enable us to command the richest commerce of the world,-r*not poured into the lap of a single city, but shared alike by the whole people of the United States." "The St. Louis Convention, was chiefly composed of those who were supposed to represent the northern and central routes. They have expressed no prefeience for either,—but have left that question to be settled by more accuiate surveys and explorations. They are willing to abide the result, what¬ ever it may be,—and when that result is known, to unite their energies for success. "Every friend of this great improvement will now look with deep interest to the result of the Memphis Convention. If thât 11 result ihall be respoftsîve to the condliUtorjr spMt of the St Louis resolutions, there will be nothing left for Congress to do, but to provide the plan of operations and to execute the pubUc wilL The greatest obstacle to success will be removed. "Accept, gentlemen, assurances of my high consideration. "Very respectfully, your ob't. servant, "R. W. THOMPSON. *'Messrs. Jas. C. Jones and others, Committee," St. J^ouis, Mo , October 18, 1849. Extract from the Proceedings of a Convention assembled in St. Louis on the 15th instant, composed of delegates from vari¬ ous States, to consider the propriety of connecting the Mis¬ sissippi and Pacific by Railroad and Telegraph: The following resolutions offered by the Hon. R. W. Thomp¬ son, of Indiana, were adopted; • ResolvpfJ, That in the opinion of this convention it is the duty of the General Government-to provide, at an early period, for the construction of a Central National Railroad from the valley of the Mississippi to the Pacific Ocean. Resolved^ That in the opinion of this Convention, a grand trunk Railroad, with branches to St. Louis, Memphis and Chi¬ cago, would be such a central and national one. Resolved, That a committee be appointed to communicate to the Convention to be held at Memphis the foregoing resolution«, and to request the concurrence of said Convention therein. The following resolution was introdnced by Mr. John Lough" borough, of Missouri, and passed unanimously: Resolved, Thdii when this Convention adjourns it will adjourn to re-assemble in the Citv of Philadelphia, on the first Monday of April next; that we we hereby invite our brethren who will assemble at the city of Memphis on Monday next, to adopt a similar resolution; and that the committee upon an address to the people of the United States, be hereby instructed to appeal to every State, County, city and town of the whole glorious confederacy to send up a delegation to give expression to the will of the American people. The President of the Convention announced the following gentlemen as constituting the committee provided for in Ihe third resolution: Indiana.—R. W. Thompson, Oliver H. Smith, A. S. White. Missouri—Thomas Allen, Hon. T. L. Price, Hon. James H. Birch, T. P. Risk, J Loughborough, Ashton Johnson, D. Finch, J. B. Bowlin, C. C. Whittlesey, A. Paul, Thomas Horrill, Jno. Miller, H. A. Garland, James H. Lucas, T. T. Gantt, Trusten Polk, L. Riggs, W. Wright, John D. Pierce, R. S. Blennerhas- sett, J. C. McCabe, Geo. R. Taylor, Richard Phillips, I. H. Stur¬ geon, H. A. Prout, J. C. Meyer, J. A. Rawlings, J. R. Strother. New York—Amherst K . Williams. 12 Ii^tmoïs—J. S. Roberts, J. R. Livingston, W. M. Hal!. Iowa—T. R. Curtis, Jno. A. Graham, Dr. Murray. Michigan—John Biddle. Wisconsin—Edward Vaughn, J. R. Murray. Pennsylvania—Charles Naylor, George Darsie, — Robinson. Virginia—Lieut. M. F. Maury, T. J. Shriser. • Kentucky—H. J. Eastin, Tal. P. Shaffner. Maryland—J. Elder; Mississippi—Mr. Walter. Louisiana—C. C. Lathrop. I hereby certify that the above is a correct extract from the minutes of the proceedings of the convention. Oct. 20th, 1849. A. B. CHAMBERS, Sec'ry. Mr. Stanton, of Tennessee, moved to refer the report of the St. Louis delegation to the committee on resolutions, and to prepare for business. Mr. Campbell, of Alabama, moved to lay said report on the table; whereupon a debate originated as to the effect of said resolution and its respectful or disrespectful character in refer¬ ence to the delegation from the St. Louis Convention. Mr. Campbell disclaimed any wish to manifest any but the highest respect for that delegation, and amended his motion so as to lay the report upon the speaker's table. Adopted. On motion of Mr. Cohen, of Louisiana, Mr. A. Whitney was invited to take a seat upon the floor of the convention as its guest. On motion of the sáme, the ladies from any distance within a thousand miles from Memphis were invited to take seats upon the floor of the convention. The following resolutions were severally offered by members: No. 1. By Col. Robertson, of Tennessee: Resolved^ Thdii in the opinion of this convention, it is the duty of the General Government to provide, at an early period^ for the construction of a 'National Railroad from the valley of the Mississippi to the Pacific Ocean. Resolved, That it is the duty of the General Government, in the opinion of this convention, without delay, to employ sev¬ eral able, disinterested and scientific corps of Engineers, charg¬ ed with the service of making thorough and complete surveys of all the various routes which have been designated by public opinion, from the valley of the Mississippi to the Pacific Ocean. Resolved, That after thorough and scientific surveys shall have been made, it is the duty of the General Government, in the opinion of this convention, to adopt such route from the valley of the Mississippi to the Pacific Ocean as shall have been as- certâîoed to be best—convenient of construction—-cheapest— and as nearly as mav be central to the United States. Resolved, In the opinion of this convention, that it is the duty • of the General Government, that after having adopted the route for the main National Raiivray trunk from the Mississippi 13 River to the Pacific Oecan, to aid by means of the national do¬ main, and otherwise, in the construction of such branches as will best connect with the Northern Lakes, and with the Mis¬ sissippi River at other pointá as will best connect with the great thoroughfares leading to the East, and from the Mississippi River at such other point as will best connect with the great line of improvements made and making from the Mississippi River to the Southern Atlantic cities; and also a branch from the main trunk to some suitable point on the Gulf of Mexico, East and West of the Mississippi River. No. 3. By Dr. Ashbel Smith, of Texas: Resolved^ That a committee be appointed, to consist of one from each State and Territory represented in this convention, who shall present a memorial to Congress, setting forth the importance, and indeed necessity, of opening a Military Road, which shall commence on the Red River, at some point be¬ tween the 32d and 33d degrees of North latitude, thence to El Paso, and thence along or near our Mexican Frontier, to some point on the Pacific Ocean; and also of establishing Block¬ houses along this route through the Indian country, at such in¬ tervals as may be deemed »ecessary to protect travellers and traders on this road. No. 3. M. Campbell, of Alabama, after some remarks in regard to the St. Louis Convention and the difficulties in that convention on the constitutional question involved in the dis¬ puted power of the government to build railroads, offered the following resolutions: Resolved, That it is the ©pinion of this Convention, that to relieve Congress from all embarrassments arising from the con¬ flicting state of opinion on the subject of its powers, that pre¬ paratory to the commencement of the work of constructing a line of communication between the Pacific Ocean and the At¬ lantic, the Gulf of Mexico and the Northern Lakes, tor the pur¬ poses of commerce and national defence, that an amendment should be obtained to the constitution of the United States, conferring ample authority for that purpose. Resolved, That in the opinion of this convention, the public lands of the United States contributes a legitimate and proper fund for this object. Resolved, That in the event of the appropriaticm by Congress of a considerable portion of the public lands or of the proceeds of the sales thereof, to the construction of a railroad fi^om the Mississippi valley to the Pacific Ocean, that at the same time liberal appropriations of the public iands lying within the limits of the respective States, should bè made to aid them in the construction of their works of Internal Improvement. No. 4. By Col. C. C. Mills, of Texas: Viesolved, That in the opinion of this convention, the construc¬ tion of a Railroad from San Diego to the Pacific Ocean, along Ï4 the Gila River, or near it, in a direction to tha El Paso on the Rio Grande, and thence across tire State of Texas to its North¬ ern boundary, between 32 and 33 of North latitude, termina- ting on the Mississippi River by one or more branches, between the mouth of the Ohio and Red Rivers, is recommended, by considerations of great importance, as well commercial as na¬ tional, and that the connection of the Western, Middle and Atlantic States with the Pacific by this route, is worthy of the attention of the American people. Resolved y That the Government of the United States be re* quested to comprehend this route in the survey and explorations that may be ordered for the purpose of facilitating these com¬ munications» Resohcdy That in the event of connecting the waters of the Atlantic with the Pacific, it should be found important to run a National Railroad through any part of the Mexican dominions, that the Government of the United States be requested to se? cure the right of way by cession or purchase; and that nego¬ tiations be opened with the Government of Mexico forthat purpose. No. 5. By Mr. Loughborough, of Missouri: Resolved y That in the opinion of this convention, whatever route may be selected through the mountains to the Pacific, it is the duty of the government so to terminate the great trunk on the Western bordeï of the States, as to give every State and section of the Union a fair and equal participation, by means of branches, in the commerce of the Pacific and the East. No. 6. By Mr. A. J. Yates, of Texas: Resolvedf That the committee appointed to report on tha practicability of a Railroad from the Pacific to the valley of the Mississippi, have also referred to them the consideration of a like communication from the Pacific Ocean to the Gulf of Mexico* No. 7. By Mr. De Bow, of Louisiana. 'ResolvedJ That a special committee of seven be appointed by the President of the Convention to collect and publish infor¬ mation, to prepare a memorial to the Congress and people of the United Slates, upon the subject of increasing the facil\ties of intercourse between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. No. 8. By Mr. John C.Larue, on behalf of the Louisiana delegation. "Resolved, That this Convention recommends to the Govern¬ ment of the United States, the propriety of employing its corps of Topographical Engineers in making a full survey of the territories between the Mississippi river and the Pacific ocean, as well to ascertain the mineral and agricultural capabilities of the country, as the most speedy, practicable route of commu¬ nication, either by railroad or otherwise, between the Atlantic and Pacific coast« of the United States* 15 Rcsohedy That in the oplmoû of this Convention, the imme¬ diate construction of a Military road from the Mississippi river to the Pacific is required to enable the Government to fulfill the stipulations of the recent treaty with Mexico, to protect our Southern frontier, and to facilitate the passage of emigrants to California and Oregon. R^sohefly That present commercial communication of the Atlantic cities and the valley of the Mississippi with the west¬ ern coast of the continent of America and the eastern Asia, is of vast importance to every portion of the country; that such present commmiicalion can be obtained by railroad or canal across the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Nicaragua and Panama, which railroads or canals may be constructed by private enter- prize; and this convention, in order to encourage such con¬ structions, recommends the passage of a law by the Congress of the United States, directing the Postmaster General and Sec¬ retary of War to make annual contracts for the transportation of the mails, troops and military stores of the government be¬ tween the Atlantic and Pacific ports of the country, by the shortest, speediest and cheapest route. On motion of Mr. Campbell, of Alabama, all the foregoing resolutions on the President's table, numbered from one to se¬ ven inclusive, were referred to the general Committee on Re¬ solutions. • Mr. Watkins, of Arkansas, offered the following: Resolvedf As the-sense of this convention, that the construc¬ tion of a Railroad from the valley of the Mississippi to the Pa¬ cific Ocean, for purposes of national defence and military com¬ munication and tran-portation, and to increase the value of the public domain and bring it into market, are strictly within the constitutional powers of the General Government, and it can be no objection to the exercise of this power, that it will facili¬ tate emigration and commerce. 2. That the South and 'her institutions have more to dread than to hope for in any future changes or amendments of the Federal Constitution, and we are opposed to any amendment conferring on Congress any further powers than it now pos¬ sesses over the subject of internal improvements. • Mr. Watkins, after addressing the convention, moved the adoption of the foregoing resolutions. Col. Isaac N. JÛavis, of Mississippi, moved to lay the resolu¬ tions on the table. A division of the question was called for. The delegation from Arkansas demanded a vote by Statesr on the question of laying on the table, and the Convention took a recess until four o'clock P. M., to enable the delegations to consult. . At 4 o'clock the Convention re-assembled, when Col. Davis, u of Mississippi, insisted upon his motion to lay the resolution of Mr. Watkins on the table. The following was the vote on the first resolution: Ayes* • • • Alabama, Nays* • • - Arkansas, Kentucky, Missouri, Tennessee Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, New York, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Yirglnia* 10 And the resolution was laid on the table. The following 'was the vote on the second resolution: Ayes- • • - Alabama, Nays' Illinois, Louisiana, Mississippi, Kentucky, New York, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia- 9 And the second resolution was laid on the table. # Mr. Walker, of Louisiana, presented certain letters written in answer to invitations to attend this Convention, and moved their reference to the committee on business and resolutions. Mr. Davis, of Mississippi, moved to lay them on the table— whereupon, by consent, they were withdrawn; and on motion, the Convention^adjourned till to-morrow morning, 9 o'clock. • • Arkansas, Missouri, South Carolina, Tennessee. • - • < * « Thursday, October 25,184^. The Convention met pursuant to adjournment. Opened by prayer from the Rev. Mr¿ Webber. The Hon. C. C. Clay pre¬ siding as Vice President. On motion of Mr. Stanton, of Tennessee; Resolved^ That this Convention will adjourn at 2 o'clock, P# M,. till to-morrow morning, at 9 o'clock, to give the ladies the use of the hail this evening. Mr. Borland, of Arkansas, offered the following resqlutions: B,esolved, That the committee to be raised by this Convention for memorializing Congress be instructed io recommend the adoption, by Congre?s. of the following joint Resolutions: 1. Rfsofoei/, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States in Congress assembled, That the Secretary of War be required to make use of the Corps of Engineers of the 17 United States Army, to explore and survey the country belong¬ ing to the United States entirely across the contiitent, to ascer¬ tain the shortest and best route for a national highway from the Mississippi river to the Pacific Ocean, to be traversed by «team power and otherwise. Resolved, That the Secretary of the Navy be required to make use of the naval and scientific means at the disposal of his Department, to make a hydrographical survey of the United States Pacific Coast, to ascertain the proper point, on that cöast, for the chief naval station. Resolved, That the Postmaster General be required, in co¬ operation with the Secretary of War, to establish a monthly mail from some point on the Mississippi, across the continent, to the Pacific Ocean. Resolved, That the duties required by the toregoing resolu¬ tions be performed, and reports upon them, respectively, be made to the Congiess of the United States at the earliest prac¬ ticable day. Mr. Borland desired the sense of the Convention on his resolutions. Mr. Stanton, of Tennessee, objected, and suggested their reference to the committee on resolutions; whereupon Mr. Morris, of Tennessee, moved the reference of the reso¬ lutions of Mr. Borland to the committee on resolutions, which was adopted, and the resolutions handed to the committee, then in' session. Mr. Woodward, of South Carolina, offered the following resolutions: Resolved^ That it is highly expedient, in a military and com¬ mercial point of view, that a communication, by railway, should exist between the waters of the Mississippi river and the Pacific Ocean; and that evefy means and facility that may lie within the constitutional powers of the Federal Government, if any do, should be applied to such object. Resolved, That a route, to terminate westwardly at St. Diego, on the Pacific, and eastwardly, at Memphis, on the Mississippi river, is strongly indicated by climate, temperature, geograph¬ ical and commercial relations, directness of course, centrality, and an equal regard to the interest of every part of the Union. Mr. Eastin, of Ky., offered the following amendment to the resolutions of Mr. Woodward: 1st. Resolved, That the public lands are now held, and ought to fee héld, for the benefit of all the States. 2d.' ResolvM, all the States of the Union have an equal right with the citizens of the new states, in the public lands, or in the proceeds of the sales thereof, not otherwise appropriated. 3d. Resolved, That the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans ought to be connected by a railroad communication at the. earliest 3 18 practicable period, and that the public lands are a national fund, properly applicable to this great national object. 4th. 'Resolved, That this convention have the utmost confi¬ dence in the Topographical Bureau, and that Congress should direct a full reconnoisance by said corps of all the routes now in contemplation, or a complete topographical survey of all the lines between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans within the Uni¬ ted States; and that a separate survey be made of the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, for a railroad ©r canal; and that each survey should be accompanied by estimates of cost, practicability, &c. Mr. Davis, of Mississippi, offered the following as a «Substi¬ tute: Resolved, That the committee on business, already created, be instructed to do nothing more of a general character than to report a memorial to Congress, asking for a survey of the various routes proposed for the greát railway from the valley of the Mississippi to the Pacific Ocean. Judge Sebastian, one of the general committee, being un¬ well, the delegation from Arkansas desired Gen. George W. Clarke to be substituted in place of Mr. Sebastian on that com - mittee. Col. M. White having left the convention for his home, the delegation from Louisiana desired the name of John M. Bell, Esq., of that State, to be substituted in his placé as one of the Vice Presidents, which was agreed to. , Mr. A. Boyd and Stephen H. Ellis, of Texas, appeared as delegates from Texas, and took their seats. Mr. Smith, of Texas, moved to refer the resolutions of Mr. Woodward, and the amendments of Mr. Eastin and Mr. Davis, to the committee on resolutions. > Mr. Trezevant, from the committee on resolutions, made a special report, recommending the adoption of Mr. De Bow's resolution for a committee of seven to memorialize Congress en the subjects before the convention. [See resolution No. 7, page 14, of this Journal.] Mr. Hall, of Illinois, having the floor, read a series of resolu¬ tions and addressed the convention, but gave way on a motion to adjourn, and the convention adjourned till to-morrow morn¬ ing at 9 o'clock. Friday, October 26th, 1849. The convention met pursuant to adjournment. Prayer by the Rev. Mr. Morris. Hon. C. C. Clay, of Alabama, Vice President, in the chair. Mr. Hall, of Illinois, having the floor, addressed the con¬ vention. On motion of Mr. Stanton, of Tennessee, Mr. Asa Whitney; 19 of New York, was respectfully invited to address this conven¬ tion, at 4 o'clock P. M., on the subject of his^projected railroad. Mr. Davis, of Mississippi, withdrew his substitute offered on yesterday; and the motion of Mr* Smith, of Texas, to refer thé resolutions of Mr. Woodward and Mr. Eastin to the committee on resolutions, was adopted, and the resolutions handed to the committee. Lt. M. F. Maury, chairman of the general committee, report¬ ed the following resolutions: 'Resolved^ That it is the opinion of this convention that it is the duty of the General Government to provide at an early period, for the construction of a National Railroad from the Mississippi river to the Pacific ocean. Resolved^ That to facilitate the accomplishment of this object, in the opinion of this convention, it is the duty of the General Government to constitute an efficient and competent corps of Engineers to make complete explorations and surveys of all the routes that have been designated by public opinion as proper for the line of this road. Resolved^ That after the proper surveys shall have been completed, that in the opinion of this convention, it is the duty of the General Government to locate the line of the road; and, in making the location, that route should be selected which is easiest of access, best calculated to subserve the purposes of national defence, most convenient to the people of and as far as practicable, central to the United States, and upon which a railroad can be constructed on the cheapest and best terms. Resolved^ That to carry into effect .the object of the first resolution, in the opinion of this convention, the public lands of the United States constitute a legitijfnate and prpper fund. Resolved y That after the construction of the National Rail¬ way trunk from the Mississippi river to the Pacific ocean, in the opinion of this convention, it is the duty of Congress to aid by the appropriation of the national domain, in the construction of such branch railroads as will best connect it with the North¬ ern Lakes and the great thoroughfares leading to the Atlantic ocean: and with such other points on the Mississippi river as will connect it with the lines of improvement completed or in the course of construction—and also to aid in the construction of branches from the main trunk to suitable points on the Gulf of Mexico, either east or west of the Mississippi river. Resolved^ That, in the opinion of this convention, it is the duty of the General Government to provide, under liberal con¬ ditions, for a connection between the main trank of this National Railroad and all railroads now made or which may hereafter be constructed by the authority of the several States and territories of the Union. Mr. Campbell, of Alabama, moved that the foregoing gener- 20 al report and resolutions be taken' up and adopted, which was carried and all the resolutions adopted. The committee also, through the chairman, reported the fol¬ lowing special reports and resolutions in relation to military posts, and other matters referred to them, which, on motion of Mr. Campbell, of Alabama, were adöpted: 'Resolved, That ais an important means, a necessary prelimi¬ nary to the construction of a railroad, it is the first duty of Congress to take the necessary measures for the establishment of military posts from the western confines of our western States, along thp southern boundaries of our Republic and our Indian frontier to the Pacific ocean—that these posts should be established in all proper places, not far distant from each other, and that civilized and productive settlements should be en¬ couraged around them by sales and the grant of pre-emption rights of the public lands to actual settlers, and by such other encouragement as may be deemed heceesary, so, that by these means, ample opportunities may be afforded to our engineers for the immediate survey and reconnoisance of our possessions lying between our western and southern States and the Pacific ocean, and so, also, that by these means safe, practicable roads, one or more, with facilities of travel, may be immediately formed for our citizens and for the transportation of troops and munitions of war, 6z:Ci, across our own territories, from the Atlantic to the Pacific shores, and in order that our Govern¬ ment may fulfill its recent treaty stipulations with Mexico. Your committee would further report, that in their opinion it would be highly advantageous to the commerce of this country, and add greatly to its political power and influence, if an immédiat^ connection by railroad Or canal, could be obtain¬ ed between thé Gulf oí Mexico and the Pacific ocean. Many projects of greater or less promise, for the purpose of con¬ structing the necessary works to complete such a communica¬ tion, have been of late agitated, and without, in the present state of our knowledge of the subject, pretending to decide upon their relative merits, they beg leave to recommend the adoption of the following resolution: That while the contemplated railroad across the continent is being constructed, a present communication be¬ tween the States of this Union and the American and Asiatic coasts of the Pacific ocean, is of vast importance to every por^ tion of this countrv; that such communication can be obtained by ship-canal or railroad across the Iithmus of Tehuantepee, Nicaragua or Panama, or across tHem all, which railroads or canals may be constructed by private enterprise, and this con¬ vention, in order to encourage the undertaking 'and completion of such works, recommend the passage of a law by the Congress of the United States, directing the Postmaster General, Secre- 21 tary of War, and Secretary of the Nary, to make annual contracts for the transportation of the mails, troops, and military and naval stores of the government, from the Atlantic to the Pacific posts of the country, by the shortest, speediest and cheapest route. The committee on resolutions, to Which was referred the resolution that declares "that in the event of the appropriation by Congress of a considerable portion of the proceeds of the public lands to the construction of a railroad from the Missis¬ sippi river to the Pacific ocean, tfiat at the same time liberal appropriations of the public lands lying within the limits of the States should he made to aid them respectively in their works of Internal Irnprovement,". have had the same under considera¬ tion, and have instructed me to report: that the claim of the States is equitable, because the lands of the United States, within the State, bear no charges for local improvements, nor for the expenditure of the State government, and receive benefit from both sources of expenditure. They therefore recommend the adoption of the resolution: Resolved, That in the event of the appropriation by Congress of á considerable portion of the public lands, or of the pro¬ ceeds of the sales thereof, to the construction of a railroad from the Mississippi river to the Pacific ocean, that liberal appropri¬ ations of the public lands lying within the limits of the respec¬ tive States, should be made to aid them in the construction of their works of internal improvement. The committee also reported thè following separate and spe¬ cial resolution: ♦ Resolved, That in the present state of our knowledge, we feel warranted in recommending to the particular attention of the General Government, for examination, as possessing especial advantages, the.route commencing at San,Diego on the Pacific ocean, crossing the Colorado of the West, running along the Gila river, or near it, in a direction to the Paso Del Norte, and thence across the State of Texas to its Northeastern boundary, between the 32d and 33d degrees of north latitude, terminating at some point on the Mississippi between the mouth of the Ohio river and the mouth of the Red river. Mr. Campbell moved the adoption ot the resolution. Mr. Kirkwood, of Arkansas, moved to lay the resolution on the table. Mr. Bowlin, of Missouri, called for, on the part of the dele¬ gation from Missouri, a vote by States on the motiom a recess of fifteen minutes was taken to enable delegations to consult. The Convention resumed its session, when Mr. Kirkwood withdrew his motion to lay on the table, and ofiered the follow¬ ing as a substitute for the resolution: Resoked, That a route to terminate westwardly at San Diego 22 on the Pacific ocean, and eastwardly atr Memphis on the Mis¬ sissippi river, is strongly indicated by climate, temperature, ge¬ ographical and commercial relations; directness of course, cen- trality, and ah equal regard to the interests of every part of the Union. Mr, Whittlesy, of Missouri, moved to lay. the resolution and substitute on the table, and ,Mr. Bowlin, of Missouri, on the part of that delegation, called for the yeas and nays by States. The following is the vote:. Àyès—Illinois, Missotiri and Pennsylvania—3. Nays—Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missis¬ sippi, New York, South Carolina, Texas, Tennessee and Vir¬ ginia—10. And the Convention refused to lay on the table. The following committee to prepare a memorial to Congress and the people, under a resolution of the Convention, was ap¬ pointed by the President añd hanäed to thé Secretary: J. D. B. De Bow, of Louisiana; Absolum Fowler, of Ar¬ kansas; James C. Jones, of Tennessee; J. R. Strother, of Mis¬ souri; J. F. G. Mittag, of South Carolina; Chas. C. Mills, of Texas; J. S. Yerger, of Mississippi. On rhotibn of Mr. Cohen, of Louisiana, the President of this Convention, Lt. Mi^ F. Mauiy, was added to the committee to prepare memorial to Congress. - Dr. Lea, of Tennessee, offered the following amendment to the substitute of Mr. Kirkwood: ' ' » . .. . • ■ , Resolved, That in the opinion of this Convention, this Na¬ tional Railroad should leave the Mississippi river below the moùth of the Ohio, and below where its navigation is liable to be obstructed by ice and low water. The resolution of Dr. Lea was rejected by an almost unani¬ mous vote. ^ The vote was then taken on the substitute ofTered by Dr. Kirkwood, of Arkansas—the delegation from Arkansas de¬ manding a vote by States, which resulted as follows: Ayes—Arkansas, Mississippi, South Carolina, Alabama, Ten¬ nessee and Virginia—6. Nays—Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, New York, Pennsylvania, Georgia and Texas—8. So the amendm en t or substitute was lost. The question then came up on the adoption of the original resolution—the Arkansas delegation demanding a vote by States—which resulted as follows: Ayes—Alabama, Georgia, Ketucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, New York, Texas, Tennessee, Virginia and S. Carolina—10. Nays—Arkansas, Missouri Pennsylvania and Illinois—4. So that the resolution of the committee was adopted—the 23 words "as possessing special advantages" having been stiicken out on the suggestion of Mr. Darsie, of Pennsylvania, and the resolution as adopted reads as follows; Resolved^ That in the present state of our knowledge, we feel warranted in recommending to the particular attention of the General Government for examination, the route commen¬ cing at San Diego, on the Pacific ocean, crossing the Colorado of the West, running along the Gila river, or near it, in a di¬ rection to the Paso Del Norte, and thence across the State of Texas to its northeastern boundary between 32 and 33 degrees of north latitude, terminating at some point on the Mississippi between the mouth of the Ohio river and the mouth of Red river. Mr. Naylor, of Pennsylvania, oiTered the following resolu¬ tion which was lost: Resolved, Th-dX when this Convention adjourns it will adjourn to unite with the late National Convention held at St. Loy is, in the city of Philadelphia, on the first Monday in April next; and that the committee appointed to address the people of the Uni¬ ted States, be instructed to appeal to every State, county and town of the confederacy to send up a delegation, there to give expression to the will of the whole American people. On motion of Mr. Walker, of Louisiana, the thanks of this Convention were tendered to the citizens of Memphis for their kindness and hospitality to the members of this body during their stav in the citv. Mr. Stanton, of Tennessee, offered the following: Resolved, That the thanks of this meeting be presented to the President of this Convention for the dignified, impartial and satisfactory manner in which he has discharged the duties of presiding over this body. Mr. Smith, of Tennessee, offered an amendment which was accepted by Mr. Stanton, including the Hon. C. C. Clay, first Vice President, who had presided and conducted most of the deliberations, and the resolution was adopted. On motion, the Convention then adjourned until half past 7 o'clock, to enable Mr. Whitney to prepare his maps, &c. preparatory to the address which he had been invited to de¬ liver. The Convention met pursuant to adjournment. The presiding officers not being present, on motion of Major Morris, of Tennessee, Colonel Nicholas Davis of Alabama, was called to the chair. Mr. Whitney then proceeded to address the Convention at length, in explanation of his project for a railroad to the Pacfic. Mr. Morris, of Tennessee, offered the following resolution: Resolved, That a committee of three, (citizens of Memphis,) be appointed to superintend the publication of the proceedings of this Convention, to embrace the memorial to Congress, and 24 such letters addressed to the General Committee as the Com¬ mittee of Publication think advisable; and that each member of this Convention be requested to contribute fifty cents to defray the expense of publication, and leave their address with the committee; and that said committee be instructed to forward a copy of the same to the President of the United States, and one to the head of each department of the General Govern¬ ment, and to each member of Congress. The chair appointed on said committee, Maj. W. B. Morris, Hon. P. P. Stanton and Maj. M. B. Winchester* Mr. Campbell, of Alabama, offered the following resolution, which was adopted: Resolved^ That the President of this Convention appoint three committees to be composed of five members each, to pre¬ pare the proper memorials to Congress upon the matters of the special reports of the General Committee of resolutions. The Convention adjourned. (Signed.) M. F. MAURY, Va., President. C. C. CLAY, Ala., Vice President. W. F. MASON, Miss., do WILLO WILLIAMS, Ten., do R. F. W. ALSTON, S. C., do D. JAMESON, Ga., do JOHN M. BELL, La., do THOS. S. DREW, Ark., do ASHBEL SMITH, Texas, do ASHTON JOHNSTOi>J,Mo., do W. M. HALL, 111., do B. E. GRAY. Ky., do JNO. T. TREZEVANT, Va., do J. H. THOMPSON, Pa., do L. L. ROBINSON, N. Y., do Alexander H. Arthur, Miss.,"" E. J. Carrell, Tenn., Alex. WalKbr, La., C. A. Price, S. C., L. J. Reardon, Ark., E. W. Upshaw, Texas, Jno. H. Walker, Ala., H. J. Eastin, Ky., Ab'm Fenley, Jr., Mo., ^ Sectetaries, APPENDIX ^ •* MEMORIAL OF THE MEMPHIS CONVENTION. To the Senate and Hause of, Representatives of the United States in Co7igress assembled. The memorial of the undersigned, members of a Committee appointed by the delegates from fifteen States of the Union, assembled in Convention at Memphis, in the State of Tennes¬ see, on the 33d day of October last, respectly shows: , That your memorialists were instructed by said Convention, to transmit its proceedings, with the resolutions adopted by al¬ most unanimous vote, to the Congress of the United States, and to prepare an address to the people, setting forth in detail, the objects of the Convention. The resolutions your memorialists were instructed to present, and which are hereunto annexed, are ten in number, and in substance to wit; The first resolution declares it to be the duty of Congress to provide, at an early period, for the construction of a railroad from tne valley of the Mississippi to the Pacific ocean. This resolution is induced by the imperative wants of the extreme western settlements of the Union, now almost entirely cut oii^ from communication with the other divisions; by the importance politically, commercially, and in a military point of view, of opening easy intercourse with these settlements; by the pros¬ pective extension of emigration to the new teritories, and^ by considerations relating to an enlarged overland trade with Asia and the Indian Seas. The second resolution recommends that an efficient corps of engineers be constituted to survey all the routes which public opinion may have indicated as proper for the line of such a railroad. The work being an extensive one, it is believed that the present engineer force of the United States, fully employed, will be entirely inadeqi:^te, and that great delays would be the result of their unaided action. The importance of early, full and complete surveys of the whole regions of New Mexico, California and Oregon, cannot be too urgently pressed. They are as necessary to a proper geographical, geological, and mineral knowledge of the country, prerequisite for emigration, as in the construction of a railroad. The third resolution calls upon Congress^ 26 tion of all the surveys, and after full knowledge of the advan¬ tages and disadvantages of every route, then, and not before, to locate the road upon that route which is easiest of access, best calculated to subserve the purposes ©f national defence, most convenient to the people, and, as far as possible, central to the Uniteli States, and upon which a railroad can be con¬ structed on the cheapest and best terms. The right of Con¬ gress to locate the route, is a condition to be insisted upon in granting facilities, &c., to individuals or to companies underta¬ king the construction. The fourth resolution designates the public lands of the Uni¬ ted States as a legitimate and proper fund for the construction of such a railroad. The Convention having embraced, in equal force, members of the great political parties, and enter¬ taining the extreme views of either, cannot be considered as pronouncing upon the constitutional powders of Congress over internal improvements. The resolution may refer to the whole income of the public land sales, or, in a qualified sense, to do¬ nations of alternate sections, &c., or to such portions of them through or near which the road should pass. The advocates of either construction will claim, under the usages of govern¬ ment many distinguished precedents. If the whole income be claimed, it will be remembered that on the admission of sever¬ al of the northwestern States into the Union, portions of their public lands, or the proceeds of the sales of the same, were set aside and reserved for purposes of education, internal improve¬ ments, &c., and that under one of these contracts with Ohio, îiie National or Cumberland road was built. There can be no sound difference, it is alleged, between donating portions of the public lands to the States for purposes of education and inter¬ nal improvements, and donating portions of the proceeds of such lands.. The former donations have, in amount, already reached twenty-eight millions five hundred and fifty-five thou¬ sand three hundred and eighty-four acres, exclusive of swamp lands, &c., of the value of thirty-five millions six hundred and ninety-four thousand two hundred and thirty dolla,rs and were to the States of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, Alabama, Mis¬ sissippi, Louisiana, Michigan, iVrkansas, Florida, Wisconsin, Iowa, &c., in sixteen sections, salines, (^c., for colleges and academies, internal improvements, seats of government, &c. If donations of alternate sections or tracts on the route of the road be claimed, the case will be still clearer and less objection¬ able. The government, as a land proprietor, is bound to con¬ tribute to such improvements as shall increase the valua of its domain upon eveVy fair and equitable principle. How far the public lands may be adequate to the construction of a great Pacific railroad will be inferred from the records of the Land Office. Between the years 1833 and 1810 inclusive, the aver¬ age sales reached nearly nine millions of dollars annually, the iiic'liest Ihnirc h:úim tAventv-íive millions one hundred and six- O tw o V - 27 ty-seven thousand eight hundred and thirty-eight dollars in 1836, and the lowest, two nfiillions two hundred and fifty-two thousand two hundred and two dollars in 1840. The average sales from 1841 to 1848 inclusive, do not exceed two millions ome hundred and ninety-five thousand dollars annually, the highest figure being three millions two hundred and ninety-six thousand, four hundred and four dollars and eight cents in 1848. In the event of a railroad being undertaken, it is likely they would swell to a higher amount, reaching in the aggregate per¬ haps four or five millions of dollars annually. The fifth resolution urges a similar application of the national domain in aid of such branch roads as may be undertaken, con¬ necting the main pacific trunk with the waters of the northern lakes, the Gulf of Mexico, or the Atlantic. The arguments applicable to the previous resolution apply with equal foi ce to this. These branch roads making a part of the one great en¬ terprise, and necessary to its completion, seem to stand upon an equal footing for public favor. The sixth resolution sets out the fifth in more general terms. The seventh resolution relates to the necessity of establish- •r ing military posts from our western confines, along the Indian frontier and Mexican boundary to the Pacific ocean: and of encouraging settlements about these posts, by grants of pre¬ emption rights in the public lands, etc. The establishment of such posts and settlements will give greater facilities to the en¬ gineers engaged upon surveys, secure the existence from one to the other, and along the whole line of safe^ practical roads for travel and transportation of troops and munitions of war, and enable the government to fulfill its treaty stipulations with Mexico, in regard to the defences of our frontier. It is be¬ lieved that the Convention, in this, asks nothing that is not ne¬ cessary and proper, and within the power of Congress; and that any delay in the execution must be fraught w^ith danger to the interests, not only of the country enibraced, but of the whole Union. The innumerable roads that have been opened by the government, in every period of its history, through the territories, and more especially the military roads from the "west bank of the Mississippi, through Arkansas and the Indian lands, evidence the requisitions of every new country. What¬ ever other roads may be opened to the Pacific—and they will be indispensable in promoting emigration and travel during the very long period, that must in any case elapse, before the com¬ pletion of a railroad—this, by the valley of the Gila, is entitled to the highest consideration, and will bring us into immediate commercial intercourse with the northern provinces of Mexico, among the most thriving in that republic. It is suggested that the road set out from Shreveport, or the head of navigation on Soda lake, shortening the distance thus fifty miles, pursue a northwesterly direction on the divide be¬ tween the Cypress and Sabine river to the intersection of the 28 contemplated railroad route—thence on to El Paso and alon^ the Gila river to the head of the bay of California, opening, at that point, upon the fertile plains of California. The road Wipuld be in length but five hundred and fifty miles from the head of Soda lake to El Paso, and, in the whole distance, one of the best in America, through a country abounding in water and the richest grazing facilities. From El Paso to California Bay, the distance is four hundred miles; making a total of nine hundred and fifty miles, about one half the distance from St. Louis ma the South Pass, and in a climate suitable for emigrants at all seasons of the year. The eighth resolution looks to the various projected commu¬ nications by ship canal or railroad across the Isthmus of Tehu- antepec, Panama, or Nicaragua, regarding them as wholly mat¬ ters for private enterprise, though of immediate practical util¬ ity to the nation. Congress is respectfully asked to accord to each of them the favor which its merits may deserve, and in making contracts for the transportation of the mail, military and naval stores, etc., to the Pacific, select such one only as shall be the shortest, speediest and cheapest, giving in every respect the freest scope to competition. The resolution fur¬ ther declares the importance to the whole people that these Isthmus communications, one or all, be opened without delay, to substitute the present difficult, inconvenient, and expensive route across Panama. The ninth resolution asks, in the event of an appropriation of the whole, or of a considerable portion of the public lands for the construction of, a railroad to' the Pacific, that Congress will at the Same time make liberal appropriations of such Jands as lie within the States to the States themselves, in aid of their , \ ^ o#n internal improvement enterprises. This is but a matter of justice towards these States, who are continually adding an ad- ditibiiál value to the public property, which they are not al¬ lowed to tax, and which the government will not and cannot improve. The resolution has been defended by its author in an argument which, though ipecial in its application, may bé réádiíy extended. "The convention, in adopting the idea of appropriating thé public lands to this one great national work, did not lose sight of the equities of the new States to be relieved from the bur-^ den of the mortmain. which the federal government holds in the" new States of the Union. The State of Georgia, in ce¬ ding its western territory to the federal government, required from the government as a consideration the payment erf 1,200,000 dollars in money, and the extinguishment of the In¬ dian title to the lands in its limits. Byihese stipulations, that State was placed in the possession of all its public domain; ánd of a large sum of money. " The new States formed irom the western territory of Georgia, have been burdened with the ex- tinsruishment of the national title to the lands within their lim- oq » its. The State of Georgia distributed its lands by lottery at low prices. It is filled with a tax-paying, free-holding popula¬ tion. The States of Alabama and Mississippi have paid al¬ ready near thirty millions of dollars into the public treasury for lands, and the public title still remains unextinguised to nearly one-half of those States. From these lands those States derive no tax, nor is any improvement to be expected upon them. The lands are brought into market by State legislation and State improvements, and in the expenses of the legislation and improvements, the federal government, which receives the benefit, pays nothing. The constant supply of better lands, found in the western territories, at the same prices, have impe¬ ded the sales of lands in Alabama and Mississippi, and the in¬ terests of those States call loudly for a remedy. "There can be no constitutional objection to the appropriation by Congress ot lands to aid in the construction of works of im¬ provement within the limits of the States in which they lie. "Every proprietor finds it necessary to improve his estate by uniting in the completion of public improvements. It is a part of every man's social duty to employ a portion of his rev¬ enues for this purpose. For the United States to hold on to its lands until the last cent is extorted for them, would be to adopt a policy very injurious to the States and country. "The States of Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee and Ken¬ tucky, have sanctióned the completion of a railroad from the Gulf of Mexico to the Ohio river. The load w^ll pass through vast bodies of public lands, which will be brought at once into a favorable market in consequence of this work. The road it¬ self is national in its character. It binds the Northwest with the Gulf by a bond almost as strong as that formed by the Mis¬ sissippi river. Is it unreasonable for the States through which this road passes to receive from the federal government assis¬ tance in its completionî" The tenth resolution recommends to the special attention of Congress, as posaessitíg peculiar advantages in climate, temper¬ ature, geographical and commercial relations, directness of couise, centrality, and an equal regard to the interest of every part of the Union, a route for a railroad from the waters of the • Mississippi to the Pacific ocean, and urges upon that body its immediate survey by a competent corps of engineers. This xoute commences at San Diego, on the Pacific, crossing the Colorado of the West, running along the Gila river, or near it, in a direction to the Paso del Norte, and thence across tfie State of Texas, to its northern boundary, between the 32d and 33d^ deg. of north latitude, terminating at some ppint on the Mississippi, between the mouth of the Ohio and the mouth of the Red river. Your memorialists believe, that if surveys es¬ tablish the practicability of this route, as they conceive, flom ♦The author of the resolution states that the 33d degree was a mistake mád0 by him and by the Committee, the 34th having been intended. 30 information in their possession, will be the case, it will be re¬ garded, in every respect, the shortest, most central, and best that could be selected, to meet all the requisitions of a national highway. Your memorialists have, in an address to the people of the United States, and in their resolutions, documents, maps, &c., hereunto annexed and prayed to be made a part of this memo¬ rial, set forth in considerable detail and elaboration, the various grounds and positions taken by the Convention, and the reasons for the same, and they believe that an attentive consideration of the whole will satisfy your honorable body of the Reason¬ ableness and propriety of their claims. J. D. B. DE BOW, of La., Ch'n. And in behalf of the committee, ABSOLOM FOWLER, of Ark., JAS. C. JONES, of Tenn., J. R. STROTHER, of Missouri, .T. F. G. MITTAG, of S. C., C. C. MILLS, of Texas, G. S YERGER, of Mississippi, M. F. MAURY, of Virginia. ADDRESS OF THE MEMPHIS CONVENTION TO THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES. Fellow-Citizens :—The undersigned have been appointed a committee by the National Convention, which assembled at Memphis, Tenn., on the 23d of October last, to prepare an ad¬ dress to the people of the United States in regard to the in¬ crease of facilities of intercourse between the Atlantic and Pa¬ cific oceans. The settlement of the Oregon question and the treaty of peace with the Republic of Mexico, fix and quiet lis in the pos¬ session of territories between the lines of our western settle¬ ments and the Pacific ocean, extending through 17 degrees of latitude and 14 degrees of longitude, and embracing an area of very nearly nine hundred thousand square miles, scarcely less than one-half the whole previous domain of the republic. This immense empire between the western tributaries of the Mississippi, the Missouri and the Gulf of Mexico, and the Pacific ocean, although sparsely populated in parts, is yet an unre¬ claimed wilderness, unexplored in its greater extent, and unde- seribed, except úpon particular lines and by hurried reconnoi- sances. The trail of the Indian, the narrow path of the hun¬ ter and the trapper, the emigrant's way, over wtiich his wagons have toiled, evidence the only interruptions of these vast nnd unbrokeii'solitudes. 31 Embracing, as our limited knowledge teaches us that it does, a wide range of climates and a great diversity of physical char¬ acteristic^, this westei'n empire is destined eventually, it may well be argued, to give habitation to millions of freemen and to exhibit all the highest evidences of civilization and progress in arts and in industry. If nature in her sternest and most forbidding aspects is pre¬ sented in much of its extent, frightful mountain ranges and deep gorges, hopeless deserts, parched and sterile plains, there are not wanting tracts equalling in extent large States of our confederation, fruitful in agricultural capacities and offering re¬ turns to labor and enterprise as high as in any other quarter of the world. Within this region have beendiscoved the most valuable mines of the precious metals, rivalling in extent and in richness those of a fabulous antiquity, and seemingly, from every indication, in¬ exhaustible for ages to come. Its western limits for one thousand two hundred miles are washed by the waters of the Pacific, and indented with bays and harbors, capacious and safe, and adequate for every com¬ mercial want. This » beautiful ocean, which floats the com¬ merce of oriental climes, calm as a lake, sustains to its shores almost the relation of the Mississippi to our inland States, con¬ ducting with equal facility their coasting trade, iir vessels that could not for an hour endure the Atlantic gales. The ports and harbors of Western America are from thir¬ teen to seventeen thousand miles in sailing distance nearer to the great marts of Asiatic or Eastern commerce, than those of the Atlantic cities of the United States or of Europe. What can be wanting to a region so endowed and circum¬ stanced to command the highest influences and position, but thé presence of an active and enterprising population, who shall hasten to render available every advantage of nature. Siich a population it is believed has began its rapid advances. A State Government is -even now in process of organization upon the Pacific shores, another in the almost unexplored re¬ gions of the Utah Lake, whilpt a third and a fourth, in hurried succession, may be expected out ot the territories of New Mexico and Oregon. To these there shall be added, ere long, others to demand admission in the great confederation. Admitting the possible capacity in Oregon, California and New Mexico, to support a population to the square mile as great as the average now embraced in our States and territories, there would be an aggregate there of ten millions of inhabi¬ tants. The calculation will not be 'regarded vjild when it is reflected how sparsely populated and almost unreclaimed are many' of these States and territories. Not one half of Ver¬ mont, New Jersey, Virginia, Carolina, Géorgia, or Ohio, being in cultivation; not one-fourth of Maine, Maryland, Illinois^ not 32 one-fifth of Texas, Wisconsin, lowii, &c. If but one-half the country were adequate to habitation and industry, and the pre¬ sent density of Pensylvania were attained, the whole amount would then swell to twenty millions, or to very nearly the ex¬ isting strength of the nation. The density of Pennsylvania is but 3^7 to the square mile, whilst that of some of the New Eng¬ land States is several times as great, and of many European nations immensely larger. Within what period either of these figures can be attained or proportionably high ones, will depend upon a variety of circumstances, impossible to be taken into the calculation. In the most favorable view it will aid us to consider that the Uni¬ ted States have gained in sixty years almost the entire amount claimed upon the highest, and the Mississippi valley in half that time upon the lowest basis, and that within the period of al¬ most a single year upwards of eighty thousand emigrants have settled in California. Whatever physical or other advantages possessed by a coun¬ try, the inducements to emigration and settlement must be greatly counteracted or controlled by the expense and diiScul- ties of access and of intercommunication afterwards. In, the case before us, the emigrant's wagon must rattle over crags and mountains and through inhospitable wildernesses for wearisome months and with innumerable hardships, after the frontiers of the States are passed. Or if the routes by the Isthmus or of Cape Horn be selected, then a dangerous and protracted navigation of the ocean for five thousand to eigh¬ teen thousand miles must be compassed, equivalent to several voyages to Europe. Nothing but the highest and most alluring stimulants could surmount obstacles such as these. Exile— hopeless exile and the sundering of every sacred tie are in^ volved. Fairy dreams of treasures as precious and as inex¬ haustible as the lamp of Aladdin ever revealed in Eastern fic¬ tion, awaiting the hand that shall garner them without an effort may be such a stimulant, but are not these dreams necessarily unreal, and doomed as all experience demonstrates, to be event¬ ually dissipated. An event like this would consign the country however otherwise favored, to ages almost of wlderness ex¬ istence. History evinces every where in the clearest and strongest light the extent to which emigration and settlement are influ¬ enced by natural and arüficial facilities of intercourse. The great Mississippi valley may emphatically be said to be the creation of the steam engine, for without its magic power, of how limited avail were ttfese iiñmense water courses that mark the country, and what centuries mûst have elapsed before the progress of arts and of enterprise could have swept away the traces of savage life.\ Not atphe must there be furnished to the emigrant a passage 33 for himself, expeditious and cheap, but equally indispensable is it that the produce of his labor and his enterprise command a market by similar facilities. Restricted to the Cumberland road across the mountains, or to the flat and keelboat navigation of the rivers, with their attend¬ ant uncertainties and monthly delays, could western produce have ever sought in any quantity eastern markets, or would there have been western producers? Since the dominion of steam has been established upon the Mississippi, the great west has increased from a population of two millions two hundred and seventeen thousand four hundred and sixty-threeln 1820, to three millions six hundred and seventy-two thousand five hundred and sixty-nine in 1830; five millions three hundred and two thousand nine hundred and eighteen in 1840 and ten millions very nearly in 1850. If all of this were not too evident to need illustration, it might readily be shown from the home trade of a country as compared with the foreign, the influences of near and easily accessable markets over those that are more remote. Our whole foreign trade, with the seven hundred millions of Europe and Asia, rqaches in amount but three hundred millions of dol¬ lars; whilst among the twenty-two millions at home is conduc¬ ted an annual commerce in purchases and sales of at least one billion five hundred millions dollars. Trade which seeks exclu¬ sively its own advantage, acknowledges no distinctions or pre¬ judices between the native and the foreigner. TarifFs and pre¬ scriptions may account for many of its phenomena, but vicin- nage and transportation furnish the more constant and reliable solution. Confine the west to its original modes of communication, and give to her the present population she supports, the extent of her intercourse with the eastern States, it may be confident¬ ly afiirmed would not be greater than our present intercourse with France or Germany, the facilities in either case being about the same. Nor are the existence of means of easy, cheap and expedi¬ tious intercourse between the difierent sections of a country im¬ portant only in advancing the interests of its trade and popu¬ lation, They have an influence still higher and more marked upon its political institutions. In the federative element of our republican system they constitute an important basis. A dense population, widely diffused over an immense area, and separa¬ ted by physical barriers, will, from the absence of all inter¬ course, engender local and provincial interests, fixed prejudices and even hostilities. The absorbing and controlling influences of great cities begin then to be paramount, and, as in Europe, to give laws to the State or the Empire. A government equal in its benefits and its burdens upon all the parts becomes im¬ possible. The remote representative = will occupy almost the entire year in passing from the capital lo his constiluents and Si back again, and revolution after revolution may change the whole face of government before these constituents can be ad¬ vised of the danger and prepare to counteract it. Strong or central governments become indispensable, and large standing armies, which are at war with the whole theory of federation and republicanism itself. The authors of our present government seem to have been apprehensive of this danger, but it was not permitted to them to see the great remedy which the progress of arts, sciences and civilization has revealed. They saw how problematical was the political connection of the west and east, separated by great mountain chains and barriers occupying months in the passage. Hence the scope of Spanish intrigues, the machina¬ tions of ambitious demagogues, half-fledged treason itself.— Hence the anxious movements of Executive power and of Con¬ gress. What was but incipient, can any question, had there been a dense and crowded population, would have been actual and triumphant revolution, and the republic of the Mississippi before this an established fact. How much stronger then are the apprehensions for regions, as remote as those of the Pacific, more distant from the capital at Washington than Great Britain, and to be reached by com¬ munications more hazardous, protracted and expensive* Is it not infatuation to suppose that States so remote could be-con¬ tent to receive their laws for any time from this capital, or would they not infinitely prefer to it a separate and distinct or¬ ganization? The soundest and best republicans would take this view. Not otherwise could the high destinies of that country be achieved. The problem of our federative system becomes impossible of solution, where the number of States and extent of Territories have augmented so vastly, unless some cohesive influences can be brought to operate. It has been for steam and magnetisna to supply this cohesion, annihilating the eflects of timö áiidt space, and presenting the greatest security for the political generation of man and the eyentual triumph of our free institu¬ tions^ The highest interest of the United States demand that her vast territorial possessions be peopled in the shortest period of time, and that every legitimate and constitutional encourage¬ ment be given, come in what shape it may, for the augmenta¬ tion of the resources, power and unity of the nation. The Convention which assembled at Memphis bad for its ob¬ ject an increase of the facilities of intercourse between the At¬ lantic shores and the population which has located, or may lo¬ cate itself upon the Pacific, or in the country intermediate, even as an earlier convention at the same city looked to the connect tion of the Atlantic with the Mississippi Valley. Del^ations were in attendance in greater or less strength from the State» of New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, South Carolina, Geor- 35 gîa, Alabama, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Arkansas, Tennes¬ see, Kentucky, Missouri, Illinois and Ohio. The results of their deliberations, which were conducted harmoniously, have been given to the world. Three methods of increasing the facilities of intercourse be¬ tween the oceans are recommended to the nation by this con¬ vention. 1. A railroad across the continent and through the States and Territories of the Union. 2. A connection by ship canal, or railway, through some one or more of the points that have been indicated, far to the south¬ ward of our territories and within the jurisdiction of Mexico and Central America. 3. A military road along the Mexican frontier. I. A Railroad across the Continent.—The Convention took the broad ground of recommending to Congress explorations and surveys of all the routes designated by public opinion, and a selection of that route which is easiest of access, best calcula¬ ted to subserve the purposes of national defence, most conven¬ ient, most central, and 'which can be constructed upon the cheapest terms. In the present limited information which ob¬ tains it was impossible to go further and commit the conven¬ tion to any one of these routes as an indispensable condition. A marked preference, however, was expressed by the conven¬ tion, as we shall hereafter see. Th© action and force of the body was concentrated upon the road itself, as necessary and proper and within reach of the means and enterprise of the American people. Upon these points there was little if any diversity of opinion. No plan of construction is recommended, except that the public lands of the United States constitute a legitimate and proper fund for the purpose. Sufficient, it is believed, has been said of the necessity and propriety of greatly increased facilities of intercourse with the Pacific shores of the Union, and the question of a railroad must stand or fail upon its own merits of practicability and conso¬ nance with the enterprise and resources of the nation. In estimating the practicability of railroads, the considera¬ tions of length, natural obstacles to be surmounted, character of intermediate country, population and productions to be com¬ manded, termini, are of controlling importance. A road to the Pacific ocean concentrates in the highest pos¬ sible degree upon itself almost every objection that can be raised from these considerations. It is four times the length, on the shortest route, of any road as yet constructed in this or any other country. Its path is interrupted by obstacles of the most stupendous character, mountains, gorges, rivers, deserts. Im¬ mense tracts for hundreds of miles of the country through which it must pass are hopeless and sterile wastes. In scarcely any portion of its giant length have advanced the traces of civ- 3G îlizatîon or even population. Fatal in the general commercial view must be the weight of these objections, unless there be found relief in the character of the termini, or in the political and military considerations that are involved. Combining the political questions with that of the termini, which cannot otherwise be considered than on the one side the twenty millions of enterprising and active producers of the United States, and on the other the seven hundred millions of inhabitants of Asia and the Indian Seas, do these relieve the matter from its otherwise most unpromising attitude? Political considerations have nothing at all to do with the ac¬ tion of individuals or companies pursuing their own ends and devices, and in the conflict of opinion which exists with regard to the extent of government power in constructing internal im¬ provements, it is impossible to say how far they may be àd- mitted by it to influence the construction of the road. Could such considerations indue© a direct appropriation from the na¬ tional coffers or a pledge of the national faith? The right and power of donating the public lands in such a cause seems to have been no where denied; but would such donations be ade¬ quate to the construction and operation of the road, irrespec¬ tive of its commercial complexion? Taking the most favorable case that can be presented—that population will follow the line of the road in a broad belt of from fifty to two hundred miles, and settlements keep pace with construction—that no portion of the road can be through a wilderness, since it can be said of scarcely any part of the country to be traversed, it is incapable of supporting population and industry in any one of its emplpyments and forms—that hundreds of thousands of emigrants would be attracted from Europe annually as operatives, who would all become perma¬ nent settlers on the route—that a great road is but a series of lesser ones, and that each of these last being necessary to the trade and travel of its own neighborhood, and capable of being supported by it, the whole must, for an obvious reason, be ca¬ pable of a similar support—that the most which can be said against the practicability of such a road is, it is beyond and not opposed to our experience—that indications of great and valu¬ able mineral resources upon the lines to be pursued promise vast contributions to the enterprise—that on the most favorable routes projected the obstacles are only in limited sections, whilst the major extent may be constructed with less difficulty and expense than upon the average of American roads—that all experience shows the railroad creates the trade that supports it, and augments indefinitely the intercourse of points commanded —that in the progress of improvement the cost of construc¬ tion and the rates of freight have progressively and regularly declined, and that the tendency in the same direction continues imdiminished, &c., &c. Giving their full weight to considerations of this kind, and to 37 many of them we shall recur again, it may be doubted upon the whole, whether they leave the matter so unembarrassed, that the practicability of a Pacific railroad within two or three gen¬ erations can be demonstrated, unless the possible trade with the Pacific ocean and the East give a new turn to the discussion. From the earliest periods of the world's history the trade of the oriental seas has enriched the nations who have been so fortunate as to control it. It is unnecessary to dwell upon the power and the glory and the maritime splendors of Tyre, and Alexandria, and Yenice, and finally of Britain, who has now usurped the sceptre of them all. It is a trade that has endured and triumphed over every character of obstacle, and from its pre¬ cious value perrehnially flourished. Neither trackless deserts, nor savage man, nor fierce storms and rude navigation of the deep for tedious months have disturbed its course. Nations have wared for the empire in its gift, and diplomacy exhausted upon it her highest resources. Can this sceptre be wrested into our hands through the instru¬ mentality of the States upon the Pacific shores of the Union, so immediately proximate to the very gates of the East, and will a railroad connection between these States and the valley of the Mississippi connecting with the lines that already strike the Atlantic coast effect the transfer? The value of Eastern commerce with all the world was in 1841 according to a report made in the Senate of the United States about two hundred and fifty millions of dollars, or to be more specific, in imports one hundred and fifty-eight millions eight hundred and sixty-six thousand nine hundred and eighty dollars, and in exports eighty-six millions four hundred and fitty- three thousand two hundred and thirty-eight dollars, the bal¬ ance being greatly in favor of India. The number of ships employed was one thousand five hundred and eighty-four, of an aggregate tonnage of six hundred and eight thousand five hundred and fifteen. The value of this trade has been greatly in¬ creased, and may be estimated at the present time nearer three hundred and fifty millions of dollars, requiring about two thou¬ sand ships of the gross value say sixty millions of dollars.— The commodities included in it are in the main of the most valuable character, being silks, teas, spices, the finer manufac¬ tures of cotton and wool, indigo, opium, drugs, fancy ware, precious metals, and these are such as are capable of enduring the most expensive transportations. These articles might be indefinitely multiplied to suit the w;ants and even the caprices of the respective parties could there be any considerable re¬ duction in the transit expenses. A reduction of two-thirds or even one half the distance, and a similar reduction in time would lead to an almost unlimited extension. Many new pro¬ ducts would then endure transportation which are now too perishable or bulky. The travel would also be immensely in¬ creased. New markets would be opened for millions and hun- 38 dreds of millions of Eastern consumers. The Sandwich Isl¬ ands are but now in the infancy of their growth. There are one million five hundred thousand Polynesians. Celebes con¬ tains three millions, and Java five or six millions, who export thirty millions of dollars annually to Holland. Sumatra, with a population of two millions, exports thirty millions pounds spices. Borneo with three or four millions, exports gold, tin, antimony and diamonds. The Phillipines have three millions five hundred thousand producers of sugar, coffee, indigo and hemp. Singapore is the great centre of Indian trade. India contains one hundred and eighty-four millions, including Cabul and Affghanistan, Calcutta, Bombay, Madras, Ceylon, &c., with a commerce of one hundred and fifty millions of dollars annu¬ ally. Australia is an infant but most promising colony. Rus¬ sian America is not destitute of hope, nor the Manchoo Tarta- ry. The fifty millions of Japan with their rich produce are still suffered to remain almost closed entirely to commerce.—• The Empire of China with three hundred and fifty millions in¬ habitants, we scarcely see more of than the walls. The great rivers Sanghalin and Yang-tsee Eaang, the Mississippi and Mis¬ souri of the Eastern continent, each about four thousand miles in length, connect the coasts witli the vast and densely popu¬ lous interior. Can it be imagined, then, that these immense regions, so thronged with human beings, most of them in high advance¬ ment, have already reached the acme of their foreign trade, ©r is it not plausible that when better systems of intercourse are opened, jealousies removed and civilization extended, the amount of trade conducted with them will be augmented sev¬ eral fold, reaching perhaps in the annual aggregate to nearer five hundred or eight hundred millions of dollars, or even even¬ tually one billion of dollars? Instead of two thousand travel¬ lers annually visiting the East, would not the number in such a contingency swell to thirty thousand or even fifty thousand? Will this great trade prefer to its present routes a rival one across the Pacific of four or five thousand miles, for example to San Francisco, there to be taken two thousand miles upon a railroad to the valley of the Mississippi, thence seven hundred to one thousand miles by steamboat or continuous railroad to the Atlantic or Gulf ports, thence for three or four thousand miles to Europe, being a total distance of ten or twelve thou¬ sand miles, against eighteen to twenty thousand at present, re¬ quiring in the one instancy from twenty-five to thirty-seven days, and in the other one hundred and ten to one hundred and sixty days? Many and strong doubts may be entertained even by the most sanguine, and it is not to our purpose to hazard the meas¬ ure by the expression of any degree of confidence which the facts will not conclusivelv warrant. Upon the one sMe may be alleged the high rates of railroad 39 transportation in comparison with shipping, the greatly in¬ creased cost and detriment of so many transhipments, &c., &c.; whilst upon the other, the saving in interest and insurance and distance will be pressed with equal force. These savings would amount upon a reasonable estimate to the following: Interest upon the value of half the shipping discharged, viz: upon thirty millions of dollars, one million five hundred thousand dollars; three months' interest in time gained, upon three hundred mil¬ lions of dollars products, three millions five hundred thousand dollars; total five millions of dollars. A bonus upon this showing of five millions of dollars per an¬ num is offered to the railroad, which amount may be reasona¬ bly charged upon the present shipping receipts of Eastern com¬ merce. In addition to this consideration, there are many others which should be kept steadily in view. Railroad enterprises are still in ;ihelr infancy, and the tariff of freights they have adopted have already been reduced to an extent which does not appear to have been within the contemplation of their most enthusias¬ tic advocates. They are now employed in transporting, for hundreds of miles, coal, iron aad granite, the heaviest and least valuable in proportion to bulk of all known commodities^ A single locomotive of American construction will haul from one thousand to one thousand two hundred tons at the rate of ten miles an hour, when twenty tons in the same time was originally considered the ultimatum. They compete with canals and run parallel with the banks of Gonsiderable water courses. Their cost of construction has been undergoing continual reduction, and is now from one-third to one-half less than at earlier peri¬ ods. This reduction is the result of improvements in the man¬ ufacture of bar iron, which sold in Liverpool at fourteen pounck per ton in 1825, and is worth in 1849 five pounds five shillings, promising even greater reductions in our own country when the process of Mr» Salter, of New Jersey, lately patented, is sei into successful action; of depreciation in the value of labor and the interest of money; of mora econonfical and experience management and rapidly progressing improvements in the power, character and cheapness of raachinèry, admitting of vastly increased work in the same time; of greatly lower ro* qmrements in the extent, of grading operations and amount of levelling necessary; immensely carried out by Mr. Prenchy^ of Virginia, who by supplying adhesion to the wheels and re¬ ducing the weight of iJie engine enables it to ascend and descend elevations without inclined planes. With the reduction of all of these elements of railroad economy must follow greater and greater reductions of freight. The average rates upon railroads in the United Slates may , be fairly stated at three cts. per ton per mile, against fully six cts. at a period twenty years ago. This average, for the reason^ above hintcij, in the next fifteen or twenty years, or by the 40 time a Pacific railioad could be in operation, it may be presumed will fall in an equal proportion, or to one and a half cent per ton per mile, being forty-five dollars from ocean to ocean. One cent per ton is the lowest rate at which freight has yet been transported upon railroads in our country, and if we make the reduction referred to, there would be for similar freight a charge of one-half cent per ton per mile, or fifteen dollars the ton from the Atlantic to the Pacific, three thousand miles. Upon the lowest or highest of these rates a barrel of flour, beef or pork could be placed upon the Pacific from the Mississippi Valley at from one dollar and a half to three dollars, and a bushel of corn or wheat from twenty-five to fifty cents, a hogshead of sugar from seven to fifteen dollars. The lower rates for the bulky and less valuable products, and the higher for those of more precious character, would be a fairer estimate. It is known to be the custom now of most of our roads to make discriminations of the kind, producing their div¬ idends from passengers and the more valuable articles, and tax¬ ing the heavier with nothing but the wear and tear of the road, and the actual cost and labor of transportation. These facts and suggestions are presented for what they are worth. If freight and merchandise can be transported over the route at any thing like the cost indicated by us, then the problem of the Eastern trade is far less difficult of solution than might have been iniagined. These costs can be demon¬ strated, all things considered, about the same as are at present incurred, including, of course, the freight from either terminus to Asia or to Europe. If, on the contrary, the present average of freights must al¬ ways be maintained, then the case against the railroad, so far as Europe is concerned, is too streng perhaps to be resisted. In regard to passengers, a different ground may be taken.— The saving in time for them will be from twenty to thirty days. These passengers now pay from six to nine hundred dollars. This route would not exceed two hundred and fifty dollars. The inducements to such travel would, of necessity, be vastly aug¬ mented, and Europeans might all prefer to take it. The American trade with the East, too, will stand upon a foundation altogether more favorable. This trade, including the fisheries, now rëaches twenty-five to thirty thousand dollars annually. In the progress of our population and industry it is rapidly increasing, and must reach fifty or seventy-five millions of dollars. A road will give to it an immense stimulus. We are becoming a leading manufacturing as well as agricultural peo¬ ple, and the Great West, from the Alleghany to the Pacific, can have no better avenue of trade with India than this, if any so good. It is believed that the Atlantic States would find an equal advantage. A railroad is, therefore, presented to the people with a bonus as {previously explained of five millions of dollars per annum in 41 Us favor J with such carriage of freight and passengers as it is bound to monopolize, through an immense and growing region, with the whole trade of our Pacific coasts and the Atlantic at its command, with the considerable profits of mail carriage and government stores, with a large part of our rapidly growing trade to India, and as much of that of Europe as it can by com¬ petition induce, and superadded to all'with incalculable political and military services to be conferred, and the question is asked can such a road be regarded expedient and proper? A final question remains to be decided: Is it within the reach of our enterprise? The highest amount which has ever yet been assumed for the road is one hundred millions of dollars. The interest upon this amount at five per cent, is five millions of dollars per annum. Wear and tear of the road suppose five per cent., or an entire destruction in twenty years, five millions of dollars. The working expenses of a road upon the gross earnings is estimi- mated at fifty per cent. Therefore there must be an aggregate earning to support the road, upon this basis, of twenty millions of dollars per annum. The aggregate earnings upon all Amer¬ ican railroads is now about twenty millions of dollars, and upon those in Great Britain fifty millions of dollars, paying in the last instance an average dividend of 4-21 per cent. To earn twenty millions of dollars would require one hundred thousand passengers, or fifty thousand either way, at one hundred dollars, ten millions of dollars; mail and military service two millions of dollars; freights eight millions of dollars. But this is putting the case in its worst possible light, since upon no calculation is it proposed that the road shall pay interest upon its cost, that cost coming entirely out of the donation of government lands to the contractors. There would then be but the cost of repairs and working expenses to provide for. The sum of one hundred millions of dollars, too, is based upon the estimate of two thousand miles, and an average cost of fifty thousand dollars per mile; whereas upon the shortest projected route the distance may not exceed one thousand five hundred miles, reducing the sum to seventy-five millions of dollars.— Fifty thousand dollars the mile is double the average of roads already built, and five times the minimum. The average would give upon the shortest line less than forty millions of dollars.— This is the most favorable possible view. But admitting the gross figure of one hundred millions of dollars, and the high estimate of two thousand miles, is there any thing in the idea to stagger the American mind? We shall familiarise ourselves with it by some reflections to see how soon it loses its imposing and formidable character. In about twenty years there have been constructed nearly seven thousand miles of railroad in the United States, and those in progress will probably swell thfe amount to ten thousand 6 42 miles. The amount expended already reaches two hundred millions of dollars. Of these roads one thousand miles centre at the city of Boston, and required an outlay of forty-nine mill¬ ions two hundred and twenty-one thousand four hundred dol¬ lars. Our whole public works constructed, including every de¬ scription in the same time, would perhaps reach five hundred mil¬ lions of dollars. Great Britain meanwhile has built five thousand miles at a cost of five hundred and fifty millions of dollars, and projects four thousand additional miles, swelling the aggregate to one billion. Her great Northwestern road, four hundred and twenty-eight miles in length, exhausted one hundred and four millions of dollars in its construction, sufiicient to build our way from ocean to ocean. France has expended o-ne hun¬ dred and thirty-seven millions of dollars, Germany one hundred and sixty-eght millions of dollars, Holland thirty-nine millions, and even Russia, despotic Russia, is on her way with three stu¬ pendous routes, from St. Petersburg to Warsaw and Cracow, to Moscow, to Odessa, to connect the Volga and the jDuna!— The passengers increased on British roads from twenty- three millions four hundred and sixty-six thousand eight hun¬ dred and ninety-six in .1843, to fifty-seven millions nine hun¬ dred and sixty-five thousand and seventy in 184S, or more than double, and the receipts from them in the last period was five millions seven hundred and twenty thousand three hundred and eighty-two pounds, or about thirty millions of dollars. The to¬ tal receipts from passengers and goods had augmented in six years from four millions five hundred and thirty-five thousand one hundred and eighty-nine pounds to nine millions nine hun¬ dred and thirty-three thousand five hundred and fifty-one pounds, or from twenty to fifty millions of dollars. The aver¬ age cost, per mile, of British ralways is fifty-six thousand nine hundred and fifteen pounds, or two hundred and seyenty-five thousand dollars, the Blackw^ell road having cost nearly one million five hundred thousand dollars per mile! Her locomo¬ tives have reached sixty-seven, and in one instance seventy miles the hour, the average loss of life being, in 1847, one out of two millions eight hundred and eighty-seven thousand and fifty- three passengers carried, and in 1848, one in six millions four hundred and twenty-eight thousand; the German roads giving only one in twenty-five millions. When railroads were first suggested in our country, their originators were regarded as the most desperate and chimerical of men, and the most ruinous failure predicted to every scheme. We have lately had the privilege of inspecting a chart made by one of these madmen, which fell still-born and was soon for¬ gotten, but which sketches, twenty years ago, when there were not two hundred miles of successful railroads in the country, several thousand miles of routes, in various directions, and even across the mountains to the Mississippi valley, nearly everyone 43 and then that would be the centre of the earth.—^ The route would secure us the immense trade of Western North America and South America. He did not wish to speak of po¬ litical matters; but there were important political matters, daily spoken of, which would have to be considered—different inter¬ ests, opposing interests, should have the same facilities of access to the Pacific. The St. Louis resolutions were not so strong as he had thought—they had really taken Memphis and Chicago under the wing of St. Louis—her delegation had even brought an olive branch with them, but it looked to him wondrously like a railroad branch. Was the north to be absolved from all obli¬ gation to adopt our route, if a better route? Should the north, could the north, refuse to adopt that route? No. We had a right to make an imposing demonstration—why should we not? This might be, this was, a National Convention, but if we could not represent the special claims of this section, we were tied down, and this was a northern convention. The two conven¬ tions, at St. Louis and at Memphis, indicated a difference of opinion. If gentlemen thought differently they certainly ought to have gone only to one convention. He wished harmony— his resolution'sought it—-he wished whig in the extreme, and democrat in the extreme, might vote for them. His resolutions let every gentleman go upon the point of expediency and save his conscience. Would it not be queer, if the Judiciary should be distressingly compelled to say: Messrs. Congressmen look out, the Memphis Convention has expressed some shrewd doubts upon the constitutional powers of Congress. But to be serious. Congress has the power to make all needful rules and regula¬ tions for the territories and other property of the United States. Over such Congress (he thought) had a property control; noth¬ ing further. He begged pardon for this slight expression of po¬ litical sentiment; gentlemen had forced it. Dr. A. Smith, of Texa^, moved to lay the amendments on the table and to refer the resolutions of Mr. Woodward to the usual committee. Mr. Woodward, of South Carolina, rose. He did not expect to make, he did not feel called upon to make, an elaborate ar¬ gument. The gentleman from Louisiana had not met a single point in his argument; if he had, he (Mr. W.) would be glad to hear it indicated; he liked patriotism, but jockeying, intrigue 63 were to guide Congressional action in deciding upon a route.— He disliked to say these things, but they were so, and the mem¬ ber who talked to Congress of patriotism, &c., unless he "spoke for Buncomb," would be set down as a fool. Congress would decide upon a route in advance of a survey—a majority never gave up to engineers and mathematical instruments the decision of a question which they might decide in favor of a minority. The majority would run the road upon its route," even if they lan it bluffly against the mountain barriers. Unless this route was sent up to Congress by this Convention it would nevei even be heard of in a Congressional committee. Our silence would be assumed to be an admission of great doubt in reference to the merits of our route. The St. Louis Convention had endorsed the St. Louis project—why should we not do the same for the Memphis route? Other routes would come up with recommen¬ dations to Congress—and, even to the disregard of the exten¬ sive patriotism of the gentleman from Louisiana, we would have to look out for our own interests, because nobody else would.— He rather doubted the probability of the Memphis'route having a fair hearing in Congress—the Memphis route would be ground to dust and nothingness between the upper and nether millstones. We would have to wait until the attempt to construct a railroad on another route had been made, and failed—that would be the only demonstration in favor of the Memphis route. His resolu¬ tions were more national than the resolutions of the gentleman from Louisiana; his resolutions most singularly and unfortu¬ nately Indicated a region of country just embracing the slave States. That was bad and might originate scandal and unjust imputations against the convention. t Mr. Campbell, of Alabama, took the floor. The resolutions of the committee had scarcely been treated fairly; members did not seem to understand them. We are told that we must proph¬ ecy smooth things and not ¡»peak right things to the people of the United States. His State was not on the line of any of the pro¬ posed routes—he had not personal or State Interests in any of the projects before the people—but he and his State had im¬ provements which would lead them probably to favor the Mem¬ phis route. Mr. Whitney's project, it was plain, would make the section in which it was located controlling in this country— make it immensely powerful^—and therefore his project was ob¬ jectionable. We should not hesitate to indicate a particular route—-St. Louis ought to have done so—we ought to do so.— St. Louis was a noble city, and she should have indicated her route to Congress for its favorable consideration. But she had covertly done so; and that was not right. And when she talked of bringing a irunk merely to the limits of the State, this started disturbing constitutional questions, which ought to be avoided or the constitution amended. We ought not to he dis¬ cussing such matters, hut organize public senliment and act upon it, so as to secure the accomplishment of this great project. 61 Mr. Stanton made an explanation in reference to tiie remarks made by Mr. Woodward, of S. C., in reference to the manner in which votes were made among members of Congress. Mr. Woodward remarked that he meant to say that arrange¬ ments were made among members of Congress which made votes. He regretted that he had made remarks which made ex¬ planations necessary; but we must talk plainly to aspirants.-— He should cheerfully give up in favor of the best route—but we could only get the survey of the Memphis route by indicating it—it was not true that he had ever endorsed Mr. Whitney's route. CORRESPONDENCE. Charleston, S. C., May 18, 1849. Gentlemen: I am in the receipt of your very acceptable pamphlet, and communication, and if possible will endeavor to unite with./ou in convention on the 4th of July next. His Excellency Governor Seabroke will probably appoint a large number of delegates, so that this State you may expect to be represented at Memphis on that day. You are aware that a railroad from the valley of the Missis¬ sippi to the Pacific was brought to the notice of the Memphis Convention held many years since, as a part of the system then in progress, in the eastern sections of the Union; and all with the design, and tending towards the valley of the Mississippi, but which could find no terminus short of the Pacific. In pre¬ senting these views to the enlightened body there assembled, while many considered them premature, if not extravagant, few believed that the period was so near at hand, w^hen the neces¬ sity of the enterprise would be imposed on us. The Mexican war has drawn within our boundaries a large domain on the Western Ocean; and it has now become, in the judgment of the mosts sagacious statesmen, more important to devise the means .of certain and speedy communication with that Pacific frontier, than to perfect those which seemed to need impx'ovement be¬ tween the Atlantic and the valley of the Mississippi. This caû only be accomplished and effectually by a railway through our domain. The projects by the Ishmus of Panama, and through Mexico by the St. Juan and Lake Nicaragua, are but tempora¬ ry expedients, and the more objectionable as beyond our terri¬ torial limits and subject to the control of foreign powers, and not acceptable to all of our own people. 1 trust therefore that the initiatory step will be taken at the Convention about to as¬ semble at Memphis, which will give impulse and the proper direc Hon to this great enterprise. We must look to the shortest and the iiiost practicable route; to the one which at least expendi¬ ture will most effectually accomplish the object to be attained. Let us once establish a crreat railroad trunk on the route which 65 will be so recommended, and all minor or local interests can be accommodated by branch roads, or other communications, such as the Mississippi must afford, to the great railroad highway to the Pacific. Respectfully Your Ob't Serv't, JAMES GADSDEN. To John T. Trezevant, Esq., and Associate Commissioners. Indianapolis, la., October I, 1849. Gentlemen: Your very polite invitation to your contemplated Railroad Convention to be held at Memphis on the 23d of Oc¬ tober next, has been received, and until within a few days I supposed it in be practicable for me to go directly from the St. Louis Convention to yours. I need scarcely say that for some years I have taken a deep interest in these improvements, and especially to that of a railway connection between the Atlantic and the Pacific. Such a work is worthy of the age, and of this energetic and powerful nation; and I will not suffer myself to doubt for a moment that it will be accomplished sooner or later. The national interest demands it, the people of the southeast, the centre, and the west wiW demand it, and Congress must yield to such a call, and grant, in the shape of public lands, or other¬ wise, such aid as the magnitude of the work and its cost of con¬ struction shall require. The grounds upon which I place these views cannot be submitted in this brief letter. I have read with some attention your Circular Address, as well as that of the friends of the St. Louis Convention, and in some respects I differ from both. I refer to the idea that seems to pervade each, that the point of the commencement of such a work should be confined to one or other of the two points, Memphis or St. Louis. It seems to me that a single glance at the map of the United States, with a knowledge of the position of the commercial cities on the Atlantic, and of the States, through which such a work would run, will satisfy any mind, not prejudiced by local considerations, that such a work never can be confined to a single route on this side of the Rocky Mountains. It has seemed to me that Memphis might well be the point on the Mississippi in the southern route to the Atlantic, and St. Louis in the central or middle route, the first terminating at Charleston, South Carolina, and branching to Mobile, and the other terminating at the cities of Boston, New York, Phila¬ delphia, and Baltimore, by a single line from St. Louis east to the Ohio State line, and from thence branching to the last named cities. Assuming, therefore, that Memphis shall be the point on the Mississippi river of the southern route, and St. Louis of the middle or central route, it seems to follow that these two routes or branches, of the great line to the Pacific, shall unite at some point this side of the Rocky Mountains,, and from thence to the Pacific. But a single work should be thought of, and upon it 0 m íihould be concentrated the whole energies of the friends of the Atlantic and Pacific railroad of the Union. With such a con¬ centration the work, the greatest the world ever saw, may be made, while it is too obvious to need comment, that a contro¬ versy as to routes must end in the defeat of both routes, and of the project altogether, a result deeply to be deplored by all who wish to see this great work constructed, among whom I most sincerely subscribe myself. Yours Truly, O. H. SMITH. Messrs. John T. Trezevant and others, committee. Lafayette, la., Sept. 19, 1849.^ Gentlemen: I have received your letter of the 1st inst., invi¬ ting me to be presentat the National Convention of delegates proposed to be held at Memphis on the 23d proximo, "for the purpose of aiding the project of connecting the Mississippi river with the Pacific ocean, by means of a Great Central Railroad Highway.'' It would afford me great gratification to attend, if able to do so, both the convention at your place and the one summoned at St. Louis, and to unite my voice with that of the thousands of my countrymen who believe that it is competent for our gov¬ ernment to wield something more than a barren sceptre in the exercise of its powers, as connected with commerce and its ad¬ juncts. This "Northwest passage," or "Royal road to India," is now plainly discovered to lie right before our faces, and not through Arctic regions of "thick-ribbed ice;" and is worthy of the impress of our free and spirited Federal Government.— What more noble use could be made of our bountiful public do¬ main? No sectional views or divided opinions ought to mar the work. Let these questions be submitted to the umpirage of patriotism and the decisions of professional science. Under such auspices, only, can we hope to moor our fleets in the sealed ports of Ja¬ pan, and to freight our adventurous stéamers with the products of China and of India. While observing this distant and golden commerce from Memphis, St. Louis or Chicago, those places seem to have no parallax, and all to make but one point for cal¬ culation. Let the mighty voice of the nation be united in a work that is worthy of the"ambition of more than a single age. Very Respectfully Your Ob't Serv't, 'ALBERT S. WHITE. Messrs. John T. Trezevant, James C. Jones, M. B. Winches¬ ter, and others. Baltimore, May 31, 1849. Gentlemen: I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the llth inst., inviting me, in kind and flattering 67 terms, to attend the Convention which is to meet at Memphis on the 4th of July next, in regard to **the project of construct¬ ing a railroad from the valley of the Mississippi to the Pacific ocean." No invitation could be more tempting than that thus extend¬ ed to me. The subject is one which has long interested me.— The time is ripe for action in reference to it; the future is full of > promise in regard to it; and those who participate in the action of the convention, will, I doubt not, have the satisfaction here¬ after of reflecting that their agency v/as influential in promo¬ ting it. Most truly would I rejoice to be one of them. But other engagements which are paramount, place this wholly out of my power, and all that I can give in return for your invita¬ tion are my warmest wishes for your success. We live in a stirring time. Great events follow each other with a rapidity that is absolutely startling: an ordinary life time now embraces, in the fruitfulness of its occurrences, as much as many generations of old existence. Nothing proves all this more conclusively than the facts connected with the very pro¬ ject w^hich you have now^ in han^. A few years since, a railroad from the upper Lakes to Oregon was spoken of, and the subject brought before Congress, and it was admitted by the projector, that if San Francisco were the property of the United States, its harbor might be a desirable terminus—one, indeed, of too great termini, the other being at thë mouth of the Columbia. Suddenly, unexpectedly, a matter not then dreamed of, we have a war with Mexico, the brillian¬ cy of whose victories for a brief season, absorbs exclusively the attention of the public. The war ends and finds San Francisco the property of the United States. Both termini are now with¬ in our borders, and the plan of a railroad on many routes again becomes prominent. But it is advocated for great international ends. Its results are so magnificent, its effect on the world so important, as to make it almost an abstraction; and people^are inclined to look upon it as one of those great goods, too great ever to come to pass; as vain to struggle for as to grasp at a star. Suddenly, all this difficulty disappears. The gold placers are discovered—a mighty emigration sets forth—every man, wo¬ man and child of which is instituting, on the entire journey, a comparison between the ox-wagon across the prairies, the ship around Cape Horn, or a tramp across the Isthmus, and a railw^ay w^ith its well adapted machinery. Nor do the emigrantes make this comparison alone. The merchant, impatient for his returns—the remaing friends, anxious for news—those contem¬ plating a removal to the Pacific—all make it. So that á rail¬ road has become a desideratum which all believe to be within rea¬ sonable reach—all the more readih% because all have a direct interest in the realization of their w^ishes. Without the gold of California, the peopling of the Pacific coast would have been the work of long years, and the conviction of the possibility of t)8 il railroad would have grown as slowly. But the gold builds up a nation there at once, and at once every one is convinced. ,1 look, iherefore, upon the construction of the railroad, and tità|t too, forthwith, as a necessary consequence of what has al¬ ready occurred. I hail your convention as a most important improvement at exactly the right time, and my only regret is that I cannot join in its deliberations. I am gentlemen, with very great respect, Your most obedient servant, JOHN H. B. LATROBE. John T. Trezevant, and others, committee, Memphis, Tensi; 3 5556 042 This book is a preservation facsimile produced for the Northwestern University Library. It is made in compliance with copyright law and produced on acid-free archival 60# book weight paper which meets the requirements of ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (permanence of paper) Preservation facsimile printing and binding by Acme Bookbinding Charlestown, Massachusetts 2012