E 458 .3 .F58 Copy 1 MUST THE WAR GO ON? AN INQUIRY WHETHER THE UNION CAN BE RESTOHED BY ANY OTHER MEANS THAN WAR, AND WHETHER PEACE UPON ANY OTHER BASIS WOULD BE SAFE OR DURABLE. BY HENRY JLANDEBS. PHILADELPHIA: WILLIAM S. & ALFRED MARTIEX, 606 Chestnut Street. 1863. H.T. Pub. Lib, - " We ought with reverence to apjDroach that tremendous divinity that loves courage, but commands counsel. War never leaves, where it found a nation. It is never to be entered into without mature deliberation; not a deliberation lengthened out into a perplexing indecision, but a deliberation leading to a sure and fixed judgment. When so taken up, it is not to be abandoned without reason as valid, as fully, and as extensively considered. Peace may be made as unadvisedly as war. Nothing is so rash as fearj and the counsels of pusillanimity very rarely put off, whilst they are always sure to aggravate, the evils from which they would fly." Burke. ' In a theme so bloody-faced as this. Conjecture, expectation, and surmise Of aids uncertain, should not be admitted." Seco7id Fart of King Henry IV. Act i. scene iii. "Is all our travail turned to this effect? After the slaughter of so many peers, So many captains, gentlemen, and soldiers, That in this quarrel have been overthrown. And sold their bodies for their country's benefit, §hall^we ^t last conclude effeminate peace! .•^ •, \' • *• " ; ^ir»t Part «/> SiiNci Henry VI. Act v. scene iv. ' rk'(i> wejCf ^ Vo?'.s ^ide! 'PcffSt for shame. And hanff a calf's skin on those recreant limbs.' King John. Act iii. scene i. DUPLiCATEj It must be confessed that the war which the Ameri- can people are now prosecuting, whether we con- sider the forces engaged, or the result sought to be accomplished, is one of the most momentous that has ever engaged the attention of mankind. Nearly or quite a million and a half of men are assembled in hostile array, and the great question in debate is the American Union. Whether the arbitrament of arms might have been averted, whether the best or wisest policy has been adopted by the party in power, whether our generals have displayed capacity or incapacity, still, the great question which the Ameri- can people have to determine for themselves and their posterity, is, whether, in the actual posture of affairs, the Union can he restored hy any other means than tear? and whether war itself can in the end accomplish that result? If the people come to know or believe that war alone can cut the gordian-knot, that an undivided country, and an unshorn greatness, can be pre- 4 served only by war, then war, under whatever dis- couragement of military disaster, or financial embar- rassment, or administrative folly, will be prosecuted until success crowns and justifies their efforts. First, then, can any other means be adopted — an armistice, a convention — which will accomplish the desire of all our hearts, which will place the country in the proud position she occupied before this mad outbreak, " the stars of union on her brow, and the rock of independence beneath her feet" — any other means but the genius of arms which can exorcise burning passions and wild ambitions, and constrain within the golden circle of law and constitution the dissevered portions of our common political heritage 1 Whoever can believe this in the face of the public acts and declarations of the so-called Confederate Congress; the public and reiterated declarations of the envenomed and implacable Jefferson Davis;* the public and solemn acts of the legislatures of the seceded States; and the repeated and trenchant de- * In his recent message to the Confederate Congress, Jefferson Davis says: — "Earnest as has been our wish for peace, and great as have been our sacrifices and sufferings during the war, the determination of this people has, with each succeeding month, become more unalterably fixed to endure any sufferings, and continue any sacrifice, however prolonged, until their right to self-government and the sovereignty and independence of these States shall have been triumphantly vindicated and firmly estab- lished." The date of this message is January 12, 1863, and it is the latest official expression of the purpose and determination of the Southern people. clarations of the Southern press, in far greater degree the organ of Southern sentiment than is the North- ern press the organ of Northern sentiment; all supported and enforced by the greatest intensity of military effort; whoever can believe this, is a marvel of political credulity, a babe and suckling, at a time which requires the sinewy and robust qualities of a man. No; the object of the South is to sever and divide this Union. Not an act inconsistent with that object has been done, nor a voice in opposition to it been uttered by any Southern man who enjoys the confidence of the Southern people. They tell us through public bodies, through every organ of public sentiment, through all forms and modes of speech, and through the fire, and blood, and desolation of war, that they mean disunion. And shall we be lulled into a fatal security, be induced to grant an armis- tice, withdraw our blockade, and disband or reduce our army, because some member of Congress, or some member of the New Jersey legislature, upon some loose hypothesis of history or human nature, believes that if the land and naval forces were not in the way, the North and South, from mere passional attraction, would rush into each other's arms in a fond, eternal embrace! Besides, if these people who have rebelled, who have cast off", and defied the national authority, desire to make terms, if they desire to return again into the bosom of the Union, let them announce their wishes. They began the war, (we do not here inquire as to the antecedent causes,) let them initiate the peace. But for our part, let us not make advances which will be received with con- tempt and rejected with scorn.* Let us maintain the honour and uphold the dignity of the Govern- ment, and not hawk them in the marts of rebellion. If we must fail in the present contest, let us fail without dishonour, and make a record which our posterity can read without shame. Upon all the evidence accessible to the public, we are justified in asserting that the only mode of restoring the Union, if it is to be restored at all, is by arms. The path of safety for us and our children is the path of war. Intimations and sug- gestions of peace, when there is no peace, will only have the effect to sickle over and unnerve our en- terprise, and pluck victory from our grasp. The sen- timent of union is the natural and master sentiment of this people, and when the conviction enters into their heart of hearts that war alone can insure it, they will support its burdens, and bear up under its difficulties and embarrassments with a cheerful and heroic spirit. But will war produce the result at which we aim, liamely, the extension of the national authority over the seceded States'? That, we conceive, depends, * We refer, of course, to advances looking to peace, ou the basis of a restoratibn of the Union. under God, upon ourselves, upon our spirit and perseverance. Where the preponderance of numbers and resources are so greatly upon our side, nothin