SN 192 I , Finger Prints for Commercial and Personal Identification ^ lilt y;>m &a* W*r I I INTERNATIONAL TITLE RECORDING AND IDENTIFICATION BUREAU 1304-1308 PENOBSCOT BUILDING DETROIT .-. MAIN 611 .-. MICHIGAN i ! 30C =sc This Booklet is Compiled by EDWARD H. AND JAMES E. MURPHY •. And is Dedicated to the FATHERS AND MOTHERS OF AMERICA AND OTHER NATIONS January, 1922 Copyrighted 1°22 by INTERNATIONAL TITLE RECORDING AND IDENTIFICATION BUREAU / Detroit. Mich. Qjyfbsl 2* v *S •V ^H \6\^ ^ ©CI.A653871 ntt >* EDWABD II. Ml RI'IIY EDWARD H. MURPHY, of the International Title Recording and Identification Bureau, is a nationally known criminal and civil investigator, having heen actively engaged in secret service work for the past twenty-two years. He is head of the Murphy Secret Service Agency which he established in Detroit, Michigan, in 1906. Until recently, Mr. Murphy, like a great many others in a similar profession, thought of finger prints only as a means of identification for the criminally inclined. This idea has prevailed generally because of the fact that the men to whom we owe the present methods of finger print identification were, with but few exceptions, criminal investigators who, naturally, used the results of their study for the furtherance of their own line of work. In the United States alone, there are yearly many thousands of unidentified dead buried in unmarked graves. If, to this number, we add the thousands of missing persons and the hundreds of kidnapped children, the figures would total over 100,000 persons. Realizing that this appalling number could be reduced to a minimum were finger printing used as a means of personal and commercial identification, Mr. Murphy has decided to put the matter before the public in a plain, straightforward manner. He feels confident that they will readily approve and be anxious to adopt it. We do not claim to be the originators of the idea of universal finger printing. We would rather have it known that we are simply doing our share toward bringing the importance of this movement to the homes and firesides of all the people. While we are the originators of many valuable systems of finger printing, to be used for commercial purposes, it is not our intention, or desire, to burden you with their many intricacies at this time. Tli re e J JAMES E. Ml RI'IIY AMES E. MURPHY, of the International Title Recording and Identification Bureau, was in the service of the United States Government continuously from September, 1913, to November, 1920, at which time he was retired to the reserve with a commission of Captain. Considerable of his time while in the service was an assignment with the M. I. D. He has traveled the world over, and has made an intensive study of finger prints as a means of personal identification. He has made a study of the finger impressions of the natives of Hawaii, of Northern Luzon, around Bagnio, of the Philippine Islands, of the Moros in Jolo. in Tientsin, Shanghai, and along the Yangtze River. lie discovered that among these tribes the arch type of pattern predominated. In Pekin, China, he was accorded the privilege of seeing a number of finger print records that are in the possession of the royal families. As these are closely guarded, it was impossible to make a very thorough study of them. He was, however, allowed to examine some thumb prints taken as early as 100 A. D. These had been placed upon documents to protect the signatures of the then ruling Chinese monarchs. The records were in one of the old dungeons and were on silken fibre paper. If it were not for the courtesy of Ming Loo, a member of the Chinese Secret Service, it would have been impossible to see them, . When the United States eritered the World War on April 6, 1917, the demand for finger print experts was such that the country was combed for competent men. As a sufficient number could not be obtained, schools were established where special instructions were given so that we would have enough competent filers and classifiers to lake care of the finger impressions of the millions of men entering the service. That was the supreme test of the infallibility of finger printing as a means of identification. How well it answered the purpose is a matter of history. Knowing the infallibility of finger prints, Mr. Murphy, upon leaving his country's service, decided to educate the public to the value of finger prints as a means of personal and commercial identification. His initial efforts have met with such pronounced success that, by the end of 1922, he expects to have the largest private bureau in the world. Four FINGER prints were used in China over one thousand years ago. The ruling monarchs used thumb prints to prevent forgery of important documents and to prevent impersonations. Thus, it will be seen thai the first use of finger prints was for commercial purposes. It is for us to assume that the Chinese did not realize the full value of their discovery. We also hear of finger prints having been used for commercial purposes by the Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans, but have no authentic record to that effect. We, at the present time, give credit to Johannes E. Purkenje, a professor of physiology at Rreslau. for the first important step in the develop- ment of the finger print science. He, in 1823. planned a system and named some of the standard finger print patterns now in use. Had his ideas been accepted at that lime, universal finger printing would long ago have been aa accepted fact, and millions of missing people, and unidentified dead, would have been fully accounted for. In 18~)8, Sir William llerscliel. an executive of the British Empire in the Hooghly district, Bengal, India, found it necessary, as a means of positive identification of the natives entering into contracts with the British Empire, to take the impressions of the palms of their hands. This practice he dis- continued as it was found that the thumb print alone answered the required purpose. Realizing the full value of finger prints as a means of identification, he tried to induce the British Government to officially adopt and install his ideas throughout the Empire. In this he failed, but it was the foundation he had laid that opened the way for the investigation as to the value of finger printing, subsequently instigated by Sir Francis Galton. In 1888. Sir Francis C-alton named three of the standard patterns now in use, known as the "Arch," "Loop," and "Whorl." As a result of his study and research he succeeded in prevailing upon the British Government to adopt finger printing as a subsidiary to the Bertillon system of identification. Galton was then 72 years of age. His great fight was to prove the superiority of finger prints, as a means of identification, over the Bertillon system of measurements, a system devised and perfected by Alphonse Bertillon, a Fit French anthropologist who, at the age of 29, succeeded in getting the Paris Police Department to use his system, which consisted of eleven measurements of the human body. So it seems that considerable time and energy was wasted in proving the superiority of one system over the other. Had Gabon's efforts been made along the lines of educating the people to the value of finger prints for personal identification the present public interest in universal finger printing would have started at that time. Sir E. R. Henry took up the task where Galton left off, and it is to Henry that the greatest amount of credit is due for the present perfected method of finger print identification; in fact, it is the system perfected by him, and bearing his name, that is now universally used. He, like the others, however, seemed to realize the value of finger prints only as a means of positive identification of criminals, and was justifiably proud, when, in 1901, Bertil- lon, in his broadminded way, acknowledged the superiority of the Henry system of finger prints over the Bertillon system of measurements. The same year when the British Government put its official approval on Sir E. R. Henry's ideas, an epoch in finger printing as a means of criminal identification was made. From then on its progress has been rapid. But. as previously stated, nearly all the study and development has been along the line of finger printing and detecting the criminal. Perhaps the greatest movement in favor of finger prints as a means of identification, was dining the World War, when every one of the millions of men entering the service of our country was finger printed. Thus, our government set its official seal on the recording of individual finger prints. Why? Because it knew the system to be infallible; that it would be impossible for two finger prints to be exactly alike; that it would be impos- sible to duplicate the record after it was once made. Finger printing as a means of identification, was established in the Army and Navy Bureaus in Washington, in 1907. These bureaus now contain over 5,000.000 finger print records. In the Navy alone, since the installation of the finger print system, 11,817 identifications have been made. S ix Finger Prints of President Harding \M-» 7 IS NAME CLASSIFICATION '% (/ T //_ FORMULA ~ £ £, I // Harry "H. O iUwU -^ Z4XHK. .. . J. lu. Taylor ;•*>'» <«i, .,. . .yrelSondberg Sei>t.i2/21 -Sept. 22/21 . Se pt.Zgjfel 7fa?u.,»/i „//««. „«£„,./«., „?.>/.„,/ ,«,//,,./, //C, /.ur/.ote