OCT 
 
 fkfa 
 
 
 i> 
 
 
 
 
 m 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 BE 
 
 ■ 
 
 RfcM 
 
 ^B 
 
 3c 
 
 H 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 vV 
 
 
 
 
 
 c* - 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ^ *"\ 
 
 
 
 
 
 <£\ 
 
 
 
 o 
 
 
 
 
 _ < 
 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 > 
 
 
 
 A> 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 * 
 
 
 ' y oO^ 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 '% v> 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5>^. 
 
 i-i 
 
 .^' V.. 
 
 
 
 -t ^ 
 
 
 
 ** 
 
 ^' 
 
 
 
 
 
 v 6 
 
 ^ *V 
 
 
 
 
 0 
 
 A' ,f> 
 
 ■Ku 
 
 
 -I f> 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 u 
 
 ^ v^ 
 
 
 
 ■% 
 
 "**. ^ 
 
 
 * ^ 
 
 % 
 
 "-p 
 
 
 > <<, 
 
 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 
 
 
 >\V ~-» 
 
 the 'practical department of morals, 6 
 
 This position sustained by argument, and by numerous authorities, ... 6 
 This general concurrence of sentiment among mankind lays a firm founda- 
 tion, on which to build a system of practical morals, 10 
 
 Two objects are specially contemplated in practical morals. 1. The forma- 
 tion and cultivation of a permanent, strong, and delicate sense of duty. 
 2. A knowledge of the principles and rules which determine our duty in 
 
 the various situations and relations of life, 11 
 
 Analysis of the sense of duty, and its beneficial influence, 11 
 
 Conscience is an element of our mental constitution, 14 
 
 Its office is to judge and prescribe in morals, and to pronounce a definite 
 
 sentence on our conduct, 14 
 
 Its decisions are to each individual his supreme moral guide, 14 
 
 The last three positions confirmed by argument, by a brief historical review, 
 
 and by numerous authorities, ancient and modern, 14 
 
 To insure safe decisions, however, the conscience must be guided and en- 
 lightened, and the mind must be kept free from passion and prejudice, . 28 
 The conscience is to be guided and enlightened from several sources, . . 29 
 
 1. By the law of the land; but this is an imperfect guide, 29 
 
 2. By looking to the consequences of our conduct ; but this, too, is an im- 
 perfect and a subordinate guide, 33 
 
 3. By the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament; and these supply the 
 defects of the two preceding guides, 37 
 
 To confirm this last position, the Scriptures are reviewed, under the divisions 
 
 of the Patriarchal, Mosaic, and Christian dispensations, 37 
 
 The patriarchal dispensation is chiefly distinguished for facts and institutions 
 
 having a moral bearing and influence, 38 
 
 Review of the moral character of the Mosaic dispensation, 39 
 
 Review of the moral character of the Ten Commandments, 39 
 
 Review of the morality of the Psalms, the Proverbs, and the Apocrypha, . 41 
 Review of the morality of the Christian dispensation. The morality of the 
 
 Gospel is superior to that of the patriarchal and Mosaic dispensations, . 43 
 Its design was, so far as morals are concerned, to furnish motives to~moral 
 
 conduct, rather than rules; sanctions, rather than precepts, 44 
 
Xivr ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENTS. 
 
 Page 
 Christianity is the only religion which has ever contemplated extending 
 
 itself and its blessings through the earth by peaceable means, .... 44 
 This characteristic of Christianity is more extraordinary than we are accus- 
 tomed to suppose, 45 
 
 Confirmation of this, by reference to the sentiments, designs, and actions of 
 
 the ancient founders of cities, lawgivers, philosophers, &c, 44 
 
 Other chief characteristics of the morals of Christianity, 50 
 
 Our Saviour's character a part of the morality of the Gospel, 55 
 
 Tests by which to try the moral sublimity of his character. 1. The design 
 of his coming. 2. The nature of the means which he employed to ac- 
 complish his' sublime and beneficent design. 3. The personal qualities 
 displayed by him. 4. The effects actually produced by Christianity thus 
 
 far, and those which we may anticipate, ■ 57 
 
 An objection to the science of Moral Philosophy anticipated, CQ 
 
 PART I. 
 
 OUR RELATION TO GOD, AND THE MORAL DUTIES THENCE 
 
 ARISING. 
 
 CHAPTER I. Elucidation of this highest of our Relations, and 
 of the Moral Influence of a Belief in a Supreme Being. 
 
 Our conception of the Deity unites in itself the richest moral elements, 
 all that is fair, great, and good, whatever bears the impress of beauty, 
 grandeur, sublimity, order, harmony, dignity, and happiness, . ... 66 
 
 Hence, the character of the Deity is to us a fixed and ultimate standard of 
 moral excellence, by the contemplation of which, the tendencies of man 
 to wickedness are counteracted, and human nature rises above its natural 
 condition, 66 
 
 This argument respecting the special moral influence arising from a belief 
 in God, and his superintending providence, confirmed, 67 
 
 1. By an appeal to the recorded sentiments and convictions of all nations 
 which have left any writings, 67 
 
 2. By citing the sentiments of the American revolutionary Congress, . . 69 
 Belief in God, then, and his superintending providence, is alike the founda- 
 tion of morals and religion, 70 
 
 Case of the heathen who knew God, but glorified him not as God, ... 70 
 To preserve that strong conviction and deep sense of God, which is the root 
 and branch of practical morals, we must perform the duties which spring 
 from the relation in which we stand to him, 71 
 
 CHAPTER II. The general Duty of Reverencing God. 
 
 Analysis of the reverence which we owe to God, 71 
 
 Tendency and effect of levity, ridicule, sneering, and scoffing at religion, 72 
 
 CHAPTER III. The Duty of Worshipping God. 
 
 There is a distinction between reverencing and worshipping God, ... 73 
 
ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENTS. XV 
 
 Page 
 The special object of Divine worship, is to keep up in the mind a habit of 
 
 devotion and reverence, 73 
 
 Divine worship, private and public, is both natural and reasonable, ... 74 
 This position illustrated by examples, and confirmed by argument, ... 74 
 
 The chief objection against prayer answered, 76 
 
 The subject matter of which prayer and thanksgiving ought to consist, . . 77 
 Remarks on the part of Divine service which consists of preaching and cate- 
 chetical instruction, 79 
 
 Importance of catechetical instruction, 82 
 
 The benefits, public and private, of Divine worship, 82 
 
 3. It does not seem possible, in any other way, to keep up any practical 
 knowledge of God, and the ascendency of Christian principles, .... 83 
 
 2. A large part of mankind have but small opportunities of receiving moral 
 and religious instruction elsewhere than at church, . . • 84 
 
 3. Habitual joining in a common religious service has a tendency to unite 
 mankind in the bonds of a common fellowship, and to cherish and enlarge 
 
 the generous affections, 84 
 
 4. The various classes of mankind meet each other, in the church, on some- 
 thing like equal terms, and this tends to check the exclusive spirit nour- 
 ished by the artificial distinctions of human pride and power, .... 85 
 
 CHAPTER IV. The Observance of Sunday. 
 
 The moral influence of the private and public worship of God, makes the 
 observance of Sunday a matter of great moment in the view of the moral 
 philosopher, 86 
 
 Review of the early history of the Hebrew Sabbath, 87 
 
 The question, whether the institution known originally by the name of the 
 Sabbath, and in later times by the name of Sunday, was designed, save 
 the mere change of the day, to be the same, and to be of perpetual obliga- 
 tion, — argued and answered in the affirmative, 88 
 
 The duties which constitute a suitable observance of Sunday, 95 
 
 1. A cessation from labor; except the labor of attending and performing 
 Divine service, and works of necessity and mercy, 96 
 
 2. Attendance on public worship, private prayer, reading, meditation, and 
 
 the instruction of children and servants, 97 
 
 3. The appropriation of a part of the day to the moral and religious instruc- 
 tion of children in Sunday schools, is one of the greatest moral improve- 
 ments of modern times, 97 
 
 PART II. 
 
 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY, AND THE MORAL DUTIES 
 THENCE ARISING ; THAT IS, THE DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. 
 
 Christianity has made obedience to civil government imperatively binding 
 on the conscience, 100 
 
 But Christianity does not teach unlimited obedience to civil government, 
 much less does it inculcate a servile spirit, ,...•. 100 
 
 LS 
 
Xvi ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENTS. 
 
 Page 
 No obedience, too, is owed by any one, where the consequence must be a 
 
 violation of his duty to God, 100 
 
 The duty of civil obedience is prescribed in the New Testament in strong 
 
 terms, because of the overwhelming evils of anarchy and revolution, . 101 
 The right of revolution begins, at the point where civil obedience ceases to 
 
 be a virtue, 101 
 
 What this point is, those who undertake a revolution must judge for them- 
 selves, 101 
 
 Mr. Burke quoted in illustration of this subject, 101 
 
 Our Declaration of Independence has marked the right and duty of resistance 
 with as much definiteness as seems practicable, 102 
 
 CHAPTER I. Moral Duties of Rulers of every Grade. 
 
 Rulers of every grade occupy a common ground, and sustain a common re- 
 lation to their country, from which spring important moral duties, . . . 103 
 
 It is their duty to guard themselves against faction and party spirit, which 
 have been the bane of all free governments, 103 
 
 The peculiar facilities for usefulness, which they enjoy, are a great moral 
 trust, and it is their duty to use them to advance the interests of educa- 
 tion, good morals, humanity, religion, &c, 106 
 
 The dignity of office, by an easy transition, passes over to him who fills it; 
 and, therefore, rulers are especially bound, in conscience, to see that their 
 example in private be salutary in its tendency and influence, .... 108 
 
 CHAPTER II. Duties of the Citizens towards the Civil Magis- 
 trate. 
 
 The New Testament ranks these among the most important moral duties, 110 
 
 Civil governors are entitled to a fair, candid, and even favorable representa- 
 tion of their sentiments, conduct, and official measures, Ill 
 
 They are entitled, too, to a fair and reasonable active support, until their 
 conduct has been such as to forfeit a liberal confidence, 112 
 
 Even when an administration comes into office against our wishes and en- 
 deavours, they are still entitled to be judged by their measures, . . . 112 
 
 A line of distinction reasonably definite, drawn between a factious and a prin- 
 cipled opposition, 113 
 
 The sentiments of Mr. John Quincy Adams on this subject, cited, . . . 114 
 
 CHAPTER III. The Dutv of the Citizen in regard to the Ex- 
 ercise of the Elective Franchise. 
 
 It is the duty of the citizen to exercise the elective franchise with integrity 
 
 and discretion, . 115 
 
 The elective franchise is rightly regarded as a public trust, 115 
 
 In this country, this trust is one of much dignity and importance, . . . 116 
 It is an abuse of this trust to exercise it in furtherance of any private and 
 
 selfish end, 116 
 
 Two questions of practical difficulty discussed. 1. How far a man may 
 rightfully act with a party in times of public excitement. 2. How far, 
 and in what ways, he may attempt to influence the votes of other electors, 116 
 Several practices common at elections animadverted on, 118 
 
ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENTS. xvii 
 
 Page 
 CHAPTER IV. The Duty of the Citizens to cultivate a Patri- 
 otic Spirit and the Patriotic Virtues. 
 
 In the first stages of society, the great body of the people of every country 
 
 were soldiers, 119 
 
 Much of the martial spirit has descended to our times, and is regarded by 
 
 many as almost the exclusive test and evidence of patriotism, .... 120 
 Such a view of patriotism is unnatural, illiberal, and unreasonable, . . . 120 
 Patriotism analyzed into its elements, and illustrated by citing Vattel, . . 120 
 The martial spirit and virtues were esteemed superior to the peaceful spirit 
 and civil virtues, in the time of Cicero, but this opinion was not received 
 
 by him, 122 
 
 Moral power is the chief tower of strength to a country, 122 
 
 Hence a man may become a distinguished patriot, and be entitled to the 
 highest honors of patriotism, without commanding an army, .... 122 
 
 CHAPTER V. The Duty of Citizens to keep Themselves well in- 
 formed RESPECTING PUBLIC MEN AND PUBLIC MEASURES. 
 
 Such information is necessary to exercise the elective franchise with integ- 
 rity and discretion, 123 
 
 The founders of our political institutions relied for success on universal 
 education, correct information, and good moral habits among the people, 123 
 
 To this end, our constitutions and laws have made education a subject of 
 special recommendation and encouragement, 123 
 
 This position confirmed and illustrated by references to the constitutions 
 and laws of the individual States and of the United States, 124 
 
 CHAPTER VI. The Duty of the Citizen to aid in the Defence 
 of his Country, and in the Administration of Justice, by serv- 
 ing on Juries, giving Testimony on Oath, &c. 
 
 It is easy to understand, that peace is the interest of all nations, .... 127 
 
 Still, the most even-handed justice has not always secured this invaluable 
 blessing to a nation, 127 
 
 We may trust, that hereafter an international tribunal may be established 
 for the adjustment of national controversies, 127 
 
 In the mean time it is the duty of the citizen to aid in the defence of his coun- 
 try, 123 
 
 The trial by jury commended, and the duty of the citizen to serve on juries, 
 and to qualify himself for such service, explained and enforced, . . . 128 
 
 The distinction between malum prohibitum and malum per se, when made for 
 the purpose of obeying one law and evading another, entirely unsound, 131 
 
 CHAPTER VII. Moral Duties of the United States, regarded as 
 Communities, to One Another. 
 
 States, kingdoms, commonwealths, all civil communities, are moral per- 
 sons, responsible for their acts, and charged with various duties, . . .131 
 
 The United States owe to one another all the duties prescribed by the Law 
 of Nature and Nations, , 131 
 
 The foundation of the Law of Nations stated and illustrated. 131 
 
 C 
 
xviii ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENTS. 
 
 Page 
 
 Certain violations of international duties noticed, 133 
 
 The peculiar duties of the United States to each other respect the preserva- 
 tion of that harmony which so well becomes their intimate union, . . . 134 
 Three ways by which this harmony has been disturbed, noticed, .... 134 
 
 PART III. 
 
 THE CHIEF RELATIONS OF MANKIND TO ONE ANOTHER, 
 AND THE DUTIES THENCE ARISING. 
 
 The importance of these relations, and a partial enumeration of them, . 138 
 The key to the morals of this branch of the subject given us by our Saviour 
 in Matt. vii. 12 139 
 
 CHAPTER I, The Domestic Relations and the Duties springing 
 from Them. 
 
 The family is the original of all societies ; it was instituted by God himself; 
 and is, of all, the most natural, the most permanent, and the most effective 
 of good, 140 
 
 The family compared with various artificial associations, 140 
 
 Section I. The Relation of Husband and Wife, and their Reciprocal Duties. 
 
 Almost universally, a Divine origin and a religious sanction have been be- 
 lieved to pertain to this relation, 142 
 
 The importance of the marriage union, and the objects of its institution, not 
 unworthy of its Divine origin, 143 
 
 Polygamy is as inconsistent with the law of nature, as it is with the ordi- 
 nance of God, 144 
 
 A Scriptural view of the relation of husband and wife, and of its duties, 144 
 
 Two particulars dwelt upon and specially illustrated. 1. 'The practical ten- 
 dency and purpose of the union of feeling and sentiment so much insisted 
 on in the New Testament between married persons. 2. The precedence 
 assigned to the husband, and the corresponding obedience enjoined on the 
 wife, 145 
 
 Section II. Of Parents and Children. 
 
 Children are universally felt to be the first hope and highest interest of their 
 parents, . . 148 
 
 It is the duty of parents to educate their children. ......... 149 
 
 The extensive sense of the term education, explained, 149 
 
 It is the right and the duty of parents to discipline their children when 
 young, within the bounds of a reasonable discretion, 152 
 
 Valuable extract (in a note) from Lord Woodhouselee's " Life of Lord 
 Karnes," pertaining to education and discipline, 153 
 
 As children approach the age of discretion, the parental right of control and 
 discipline is softened down into a right of advice and counsel, .... 155 
 
 This right of parental advice is specially important in respect to two partic- 
 ulars. 1. The choice of the employments their children are to pursue in 
 life. 2. The connexions in marriage which they may be disposed to form 156 
 
ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENTS. xix 
 
 Page 
 The case of daughters who are unmarried, and who are likely to continue 
 
 so, considered, 159 
 
 The duty of children to their parents, 159 
 
 The term " honor " highly appropriate to express this duty, 159 
 
 The special reward promised to children who honor their parents, . . . 160 
 Children, during their early years, are to render their parents a prompt and 
 
 cheerful obedience, 161 
 
 Children are to give their parents the solace of their company and conversa- 
 tion, wheu they become aged and infirm, 161 
 
 They are bound in conscience to meet, as far as possible, in after life, the 
 expectations formed of them by their parents, 161 
 
 Section III. Of Brothers, Sisters, and more remote Relatives. 
 
 The relation of brothers and sisters furnishes the natural foundation and oc* 
 
 casions of permanent friendship and intimacies, 162 
 
 A peculiarity in the affection between a brother and a sister, noticed, . . 165 
 The degree, in which the more remote domestic relations are cherished, de- 
 pends very much on the state of society in a country, 166 
 
 Section IV. ' Relation of Master and Servant. 
 
 Servants have been reckoned a part of the families of their masters from the 
 earliest times, and the relation has been familiar in every country, . . . 168 
 
 The Scriptural view of this relation and of the duties of the respective par- 
 ties, 168 
 
 Mr. Reeve enumerates five classes of servants, but a division into three 
 classes, is sufficiently accurate for the author's purpose, „ 169 
 
 Correlative rights and duties of masters and apprentices, 170 
 
 Correlative rights, duties, and responsibilities of masters and servants, who 
 become such by their own contract, 171 
 
 Correlative duties of masters and servants who are " born in the house or 
 bought with the money of their masters," 174 
 
 Cautions given to masters, and the abuses to which this relation is most lia- 
 ble, adverted to, 175 
 
 Extract from the manuscript records of the Court of Appeals of South Caro- 
 lina, pertaining to the law of master and servant, 175 
 
 CHAPTER II. The Relation of Principal and Agent. 
 
 This relation embraces attorneys, brokers, factors, &c, 176 
 
 The general principle of the morals of principal and agent stated, .... 177 
 This relation may be created by a written document, or verbally without 
 
 writing, or by an acquiescence in the assumed agency of another, . . , 177 
 
 Distinction between a confidential and a ministerial agent, 178 
 
 General principles of the intercourse between the principal and his agent, 
 
 in respect to confidence reposed, the observance of good faith, the abuses 
 
 of the relation, &c, 178 
 
 The case where the agent is made responsible for the issue of any business 
 
 or enterprise intrusted to him, considered, 180 
 
 The class of cases in which the person employed advises and directs his 
 
 , employer, 181 
 
XX ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENTS. 
 
 Page 
 CHAPTER III. The Observance of Truth. 
 
 The observance of truth is the chief of the personal virtues, and a disregard 
 of it is among the most flagrant offences against manners, morals, and re- 
 ligion, 181 
 
 Scriptural authorities on this subject cited and reviewed, 181 
 
 Importance of an adherence to truth tested by the consequences of general 
 and indiscriminate falsehood, 182 
 
 The chief cases in which truth is violated, reviewed, 183 
 
 1. When facts, reasonings, &c, are suppressed or omitted, with the know- 
 ledge or belief, that any one will thereby be led into error, 183 
 
 2. By speaking or writing with a view to produce a particular effect, but 
 without much regard to the truth of what is spoken or written, if it is 
 fitted to accomplish the desired end, 184 
 
 3. By the practice of repeating narratives and statements, without much or 
 any inquiry into their credibility, and without much regarding whether 
 they are true or false, 186 
 
 4. Certain forms of expression usual in fashionable circles of society, seem 
 to be inconsistent with the sincerity of character and the simplicity and 
 directness of intercourse, in which much of truth consists, 187 
 
 The case of a servant's denying his master, examined, . 188 
 
 CHAPTER IV. Oaths. 
 
 The use of oaths on solemn occasions, coeval with the dawn of history, . . 190 
 
 The forms of oaths, and the ceremonies accompanying their administration, 
 
 have been various in different ages and countries, 190 
 
 In respect to the form, the principle is now well established, that every man 
 
 when admitted to an oath, shall be bound by the highest sanctions of his 
 
 own religion, 192 
 
 An oath is a religious act, — its signification explained, 192 
 
 History, argument, and experience combine to satisfy us of the efficacy of 
 
 oaths as securities for truth and integrity, 194 
 
 Complaints in regard to the abuse of oaths, have, during many years past, 
 
 been frequent and general in England and the United States, .... 196 
 Summary of the author's sentiments on this part of the subject, .... 197 
 The New British statute of the 9th of September, 1835, by which declarations 
 
 are very extensively substituted instead of oaths, solemn affirmations, and 
 
 affidavits, reviewed, and commended for imitation in the United States, 198 
 Notice of oaths which are not binding, and of extra-judicial oaths, . . . 199 
 
 CHAPTER V. Observance of Promises. 
 
 The non-observance of promises is the next highest and most dangerous 
 
 infraction of good faith, after falsehood, 200 
 
 Difference between a promise and a declaration of intention, . . . • . 200 
 The meaning to be attached to a promise when its terms admit of more 
 
 senses than one, 202 
 
 The manner in which promises are affected by conditions, 203 
 
 Our obligation in respect not only to promises, but to declarations and even 
 to our conduct, is measured by the expectations which we knowingly and 
 voluntarily excite, 204 
 
ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENTS. xxi 
 
 Page 
 
 The cases in which promises are not binding, reviewed, 205 
 
 The nature and obligation of vows, considered, 213 
 
 CHAPTER VI. Observance of Contracts. 
 
 The rule which in conscience governs the construction of all contracts 
 stated, 214 
 
 There is a gratifying and instructive coincidence between the rules of 
 Christian morals, and the rules and doctrines of the law, in regard to con- 
 tracts, 214 
 
 The principles of Christian morals are recognised as the standard of the 
 rules of law, and every contract, inconsistent with good morals, is against 
 law and void, 220 
 
 This position illustrated by materials drawn from Story's " Equity Jurispru- 
 dence " and " Conflict of Laws," 220 
 
 CHAPTER VII. The Duty of Mutual Assistance. 
 Christian benevolence much more expansive than the limits of good-will, 
 quoted from Plato and commended by Cicero, 226 
 
 Section I. Assistance given in the Way of Advice. 
 
 It is only necessary to look into the records of biography, to be convinced 
 how much good may be done, in this way, to the young, the modest, and 
 the inexperienced, . 227 
 
 A striking instance illustrative of this observation, cited, 228 
 
 Section II. Assistance given in the Way of our Employments and Professions. 
 
 This way of doing good is particularly in the power of legislators, oflicers 
 in the civil, military, and naval service, lawyers, physicians, clergymen, 
 &c, '. 22& 
 
 Section III. Assistance given in the Way of Judicious Patronage and Encour- 
 agement. 
 
 Many persons, eminently useful and successful in life, have testified, that 
 they owed all their success and usefulness to a little timely assistance and 
 encouragement, 231 
 
 Several examples given by way of illustration ; among the rest, the case of 
 Dr. Franklin, and a still more remarkable instance related by the Assistant 
 Bishop of Virginia, 231 
 
 Section IV. Assistance in the Way of Almsgiving. 
 
 No duty more frequently or more earnestly insisted on in the New Testa- 
 ment than almsgiving, 233 
 
 With two directions given us by our Saviour, we are left to consult our 
 own reason and experience in regard to the limits of the duty, the proper 
 subjects of it, the most suitable occasions of its exercise, &c, .... 234 
 
 Almsgiving is a practical problem, to wit, to relieve the suffering poor ef- 
 . fectually, and, at the same time, not to minister to vice and the increase 
 of pauperism, 234 
 
 Christian almsgiving is among the great topics which have of late years en- 
 gaged the attention of some of the best minds in Europe and in this coun- 
 try, 234 
 
xxii ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENTS. _ 
 
 Page 
 
 Former mistakes on this subject adverted to, 234 
 
 The chief abuses of almsgiving stated and illustrated, 235 
 
 Education, especially moral and religious education, the most beneficial of 
 
 all the modes of almsgiving, 238 
 
 Furnishing the poor with employment is another unexceptionable way of 
 
 benefiting them, 239 
 
 Alms given in considerable sums, to meritorious persons and families, may, 
 
 under certain circumstances, be highly useful, 240 
 
 Alms dispensed through the intervention of hospitals, almshouses, infirma- 
 ries, and asylums, considered, 240 
 
 Alms dispensed by charitable societies, considered, 241 
 
 Several popular objections to charitable societies, stated, 241 
 
 Five special rules given to direct charitable societies and individuals in dis- 
 pensing alms, 242 
 
 The administration of alms by a system of poor-laws, examined, .... 248 
 Remarkable statements drawn from the late " Reports " of the English com- 
 missioners on the poor-laws, 248 
 
 The new act of Parliament on this subject adverted to, 253 
 
 CHAPTER VIII. The Duties of Friendship. 
 
 The question, whether mankind are accustomed to associate by the influ- 
 ence of a natural principle, or by reason of the mutual aid which they 
 
 can in this way derive from each other, answered, 253 
 
 The importance of using caution in the choice of friends, . . . , . . 254 
 
 The chief duties of friendship enumerated and illustrated, 255 
 
 The chief abuses and violations to which friendship is liable, 259 
 
 The duties imposed by the discontinuance of friendship, 261 
 
 CHAPTER IX. The Relation of Benefactor and Beneficiary, 
 and its Duties. 
 
 The nature of this relation stated, and the chief duties of the respective 
 
 parties illustrated, 263 
 
 Two ways in which this relation may be abused by a benefactor, . . . 264 
 
 CHAPTER X. The Duties of Hospitality. 
 
 The Scriptures of the Old and New Testament insist very much on these 
 
 duties, . 264 
 
 The natural fruits of hospitality are, the cultivation of social intercourse, 
 
 mutual kindness and good feeling, and the removal of unjust prejudices, 265 
 Two manifest abuses of hospitality to be guarded against, 265 
 
 CHAPTER XI. The Duties of Good Neighbourhood. 
 
 The chief duties of good neighbourhood are, to render mutual aid, and to 
 cultivate friendly intercourse, harmony, and good feeling among those, 
 whose lot Providence has cast near each other, 267 
 
 The chief duties enjoined by law among neighbours, stated, 268 
 
 The chief causes, occasions, and circumstances, which are accustomed to 
 disturb and injure neighbourhoods, reviewed, 269 
 
ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENTS. xxiii 
 
 PART IV. 
 
 PERSONAL DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS, OR THE DUTIES OF 
 
 MEN TO THEMSELVES. 
 
 Page 
 
 CHAPTER I. The Duty of preserving Life and Health, includ- 
 ing a Discussion of Suicide. 
 
 Christianity looks upon our life and health, and all our other endowments, as 
 so many talents intrusted to our administration, for the use of which we 
 are responsible, 271 
 
 The duty of preserving life and health means much more than abstaining 
 from positive and known injury to either; — it includes the use of the 
 means of preserving them, 272 
 
 Suicide examined and shown to be opposed by philosophy, as well as by re- 
 ligion both natural and revealed, 272 
 
 CHAPTER II. Improvement of the Corporeal Faculties. 
 
 A good constitution of body, and a high improvement of the corporeal pow- 
 ers, are the result of a judicious and persevering physical education, . . 278 
 
 The aid of the Roman satirist, Juvenal, used, in describing the perfection of 
 the physical, intellectual, and moral man, 278 
 
 CHAPTER III. Cultivation of the Powers of the Mind. 
 
 Mental cultivation and excellence of whatever kind are, with slight qualifi- 
 cations, the fruit of the personal sacrifices, efforts, and energy of the indi- 
 vidual, 279 
 
 The various faculties of our nature should be cultivated in due proportion, 
 harmony, and consistency with each other, 280 
 
 The ancient opinion, that scientific knowledge is attainable but by a few, 
 must, with the present facilities of printing, be received with much quali- 
 fication, 281 
 
 CHAPTER IV. Cultivation of a strong, delicate, and perma- 
 nent Sense of Duty. 
 
 The being governed by a sense of duty comprises a suitable regard to every 
 consideration, principle, sentiment, opinion, relation, fact, and circum- 
 stance, from which any duty of any kind can spring, 289 
 
 CHAPTER V. The Duty of cultivating Personal Religion and 
 the Personal Virtues. 
 
 The sentiments of Lord Chatham and of the late Sir Humphrey Davy on 
 
 the importance of cultivating personal religion, cited, 291 
 
 The importance of cultivating the personal virtues and the best means of 
 
 doing so, illustrated by the examples of President Edwards and Dr. 
 
 Franklin, 294 
 
 The cultivation of personal religion and of the personal virtues contributes 
 
 essentially to health, length of days, and success in the business of life, 300 
 
xxiv ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENTS. 
 
 Page 
 CHAPTER VI. The Duty of cultivating a Delicate Sense of 
 
 Honor. 
 
 True honor analyzed by the aid of Cicero, and shown to consist of the finest 
 elements of feeling, of sentiment, and of action, 302 
 
 False honor is the misunderstanding, the abuse, and the perversion of true 
 honor, 303 
 
 CHAPTER VII. The Duty of guarding Ourselves against Pre- 
 judices, Antipathies, &c. 
 
 The effect of prejudice, prepossession, bias, &c, is, to disturb the reason, 
 to cloud and darken the understanding, and to pervert the conscience, 304 
 
 In their more intense degrees, they are unquestionably criminal, and they 
 all imply something wrong in our habits, education, ways of thinking, or 
 usual state of feeling, 305 
 
 History of prejudice illustrated by reference to personal experience, . . . 308 
 
 PART V 
 
 A REVIEW OF THE CHIEF PROFESSIONS AND EMPLOYMENTS 
 OF LIFE, SO FAR AS REGARDS THE MORAL DUTIES WHICH 
 THEY INVOLVE ; THEIR MORAL PRINCIPLES, PRACTICES, 
 INFLUENCES, AND TENDENCIES. 
 
 To the various professions and employments of life, a well-ascertained rank 
 in general estimation is attached, which has been much the same at all 
 times, and in all countries 309 
 
 Illustration of this position drawn from the writings of Cicero, .... 309 
 
 CHAPTER I. A Review of the Profession of the Law, includ- 
 ing a Moral Estimate of the Legal Profession, so far as it 
 
 NATURALLY COMES UNDER THE VlEW OF THE MORAL PHILOSOPHER. 
 
 All the best authorities insist, that good morals are essentially requisite to 
 the attainment of the highest order of excellence and success in the study 
 
 and practice of the law, 311. 
 
 This position sustained by authority and argument, 31 1 
 
 Professional honor and integrity will forbid the lawyer to engage in a busi- 
 ness of notorious wrong; but here a nice distinction arises, 313 
 
 Two very manifest principles laid down by Sir James Mackintosh, . . . 313 
 
 The acquirements most essential to the success of the lawyer, 315 
 
 The main tendency of the legal profession is, to elevate the moral character, 
 but there are incidental tendencies, which, unless guarded against, will 
 degrade the personal and professional character of the lawyer, .... 315 
 A striking difference between American and English lawyers, noticed, . . 318 
 Anticipations of Mr. Justice Story in respect to American lawyers, . . . 319 
 
 Duties of the lawyer towards his client, 320 
 
 The judicial character is naturally the perfection of the character formed 
 under the influence of the study and practice of the law, 321 
 
ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENTS. XXV 
 
 Page 
 The judicial qualities requisite to the successful administration of justice, 
 enumerated, 321 
 
 There are various occasions in the life of a judge, of which he ought to avail 
 
 himself to advance and strengthen the cause of good morals, .... 322 
 The general unsullied purity of the English and American Bench, noticed, 322 
 
 CHAPTER II. The Moral Influence and Tendency or the Study 
 and Practice of Medicine and Surgery, with the Duties of a 
 Physician to his Patients, to the Families into which he is ad- 
 mitted, to other Physicians, and to Society in general. 
 
 Result of Dr. Rush's inquiry into the lives of physicians, 323 
 
 Defects imputed to physicians, and ascribed to the study and practice of 
 medicine, 324 
 
 The inquiry, whether the study and practice of medicine tend to originate 
 and nourish infidel feelings and sentiments, answered, 325 
 
 Sir Henry Halford quoted respecting the duty of a physician to make his 
 patient acquainted with the probable issue of a malady manifesting mor- 
 tal symptoms, 327 
 
 The confidential nature of the relation, in which the physician stands to his 
 patient, and to the families into which he is admitted, illustrated, . . . 328 
 
 Circumstances in the medical profession which render competition among 
 physicians more bitter, than among the members of the other professions, 
 adverted to, 329 
 
 The complaints made against physicians, enumerated, 329 
 
 The temperance reformation much indebted to physicians, 330 
 
 CHAPTER III. Moral Influence of the Clergy on Society, in- 
 cluding an Estimate of the Clerical Character. 
 
 The morals of the clergy are the natural exemplification of the religion 
 which they preach, 331 
 
 " By their fruits we are to know " all men, and, when subjected to this rea- 
 sonable test, the Christian clergy, as a body of men, will not be found 
 wanting, 331 
 
 But more particularly, — Christianity was planted and built up chiefly by 
 the labors, dangers, sufferings, and privations of the clergy, in every 
 country which now enjoys its blessings, 332 
 
 The clergy have taken the lead in establishing institutions of learning, and 
 other institutions which have meliorated the condition of mankind, . . 335 
 
 The general influence of the parochial clergy on manners, morals, and 
 whatever else is ranked under the comprehensive term civilization, has 
 been most effective and salutary, 337 
 
 This position confirmed by a striking quotation from Dr. Arnold, and by the 
 testimony of the " Edinburgh Review," 337 
 
 Two defects generally imputed to the clergy, examined and answered, . . 339 
 
 CHAPTER IV. Moral Influence and Duties of Men of Letters. 
 Men of letters form a class considerable in point of numbers, and still more 
 so in respect to the influence which they exercise on society, .... 340 
 
 d 
 
XXVI ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENTS. 
 
 Page 
 
 Men of letters are chiefly responsible for the use which is made of the press, 
 the most mighty instrument for good or for evil, ever known, .... 340 
 
 The distinction between the freedom of the press and its licentiousness, 
 stated and illustrated, 341 
 
 The press is abused, when it is employed to circulate slander, misrepresen- 
 tation, calumny, and falsehood, in any of its forms, modifications, or de- 
 grees, 343 
 
 Men of letters criminally abuse the press, when they make their writings 
 the vehicle of immoral sentiments, or employ them to rouse and inflame 
 the licentious passions, 344 
 
 The press is still more criminally abused, when it is turned to the disparage- 
 ment, misrepresentation, and vilification of the Christian religion, . . . 344 
 
 Remarks on the influence of Gibbon's " History of the Decline and Fall of 
 the Roman Empire," 346 
 
 Duty and interest of men of letters to use their knowledge for the good of 
 society, 346 
 
 It is their duty to supply the public with the materials of reading, of an ap- 
 propriate kind and in the greatest abundance, 347 
 
 CHAPTER V. Moral Tendency and Influence of Agriculture as 
 a Profession. 
 
 The antiquity, dignity, and importance of agriculture, 348 
 
 Traits of character which the pursuit of agriculture is fitted to cherish, no- 
 ticed, 350 
 
 Judge Harper quoted respecting a- difference between the agricultural char- 
 acter of the Northern and Southern United States, 350 
 
 CHAPTER VI. Moral Tendency and Influence of Commerce and 
 Merchandise as a Profession. 
 
 The reputation of our country for probity and honor depends on our mer- 
 chants, more than on any other class of our citizens, 351 
 
 Merchants are the peacemakers of the world, for they show it to be the inter- 
 est and happiness of all to remain at peace; they bring distant nations 
 
 together, and teach them to know and aid each other, 352 
 
 The risks and perils incident to the pursuit of commerce, described, . . . 352 
 
 Estimation in which American merchants are held in Europe, 353 
 
 The moral duties imposed on a bankrupt merchant, have respect to the ap- 
 proach of his bankruptcy, and again, to the state of things when bank- 
 ruptcy has actually overtaken him, 354 
 
 The preference given to endorsers and other preferred creditors in cases of 
 
 bankruptcy, animadverted on, -. 355 
 
 The education requisite for a successful merchant, 358 
 
 Merchants have generally been held in high estimation, 360 
 
 CHAPTER VII. Moral Tendency and Influence of Manufactur- 
 ing Establishments. 
 
 Notice of the contents of a Report made to the Legislature of Massachu- 
 setts, in 1836, which shows the state of feeling and opinion in that State, 360 
 
ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENTS. xxvii 
 
 Page 
 Evils of manufacturing establishments in England, and which are begin- 
 ning to be felt in this country, noticed, and remedies suggested, . . . 362 
 
 CHAPTER VIII. Moral Tendency and Influence of the various 
 Mechanical Trades. 
 
 Influence of mechanical employments, according as they are active or se- 
 dentary, pursued under shelter or in the open air, 364 
 
 Enumeration of some special moral rules pertaining alike to all the profes- 
 sions and employments of life, 365 
 
 PART VI. 
 
 A SPECIAL CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN DUTIES AND VIR- 
 TUES, OF A CHARACTER PECULIARLY CHRISTIAN, AND A 
 SIMILAR CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN VICES AND EVILS 
 
 CHAPTER I. Duty of Forgiving Injuries. 
 
 The importance claimed for this duty in the New Testament, and a notice 
 
 of the difficulties in the way of practising it, 371 
 
 The rule of forgiveness is peculiarly adapted to the nature of man, . . . 373 
 
 It is admirably adapted to man's character and condition, 376 
 
 It is the only way of securing a permanent victory over evil, 378 
 
 The intrinsic nobleness of the rule of forgiveness illustrated, 379 
 
 CHAPTER II. Christian Charity. 
 
 The importance ascribed to charity in the New Testament, 381 
 
 The chief particulars in which this duty consists, illustrated, 382 
 
 The chief cases in which this duty is violated, reviewed, ....... 392 
 
 The chief considerations by which this duty is qualified, 401 
 
 CHAPTER III. Intemperance in Drinking. 
 
 The nature and occasions of intemperance in drinking, 405 
 
 The signs of intemperance, noticed and illustrated, 409 
 
 The chief evils of intemperance, enumerated, . , 414 
 
 The remedies of intemperance, reviewed, 416 
 
 CHAPTER IV. Gaming, including an Examination of the Moral 
 Tendency and Influence of the Lottery System. 
 
 Notice of the lottery system as a measure of finance, 419 
 
 The moral tendency and effects of this system, illustrated, 422 
 
 It has reduced many persons to insolvency, 423 
 
 It has led to numerous cases of embezzlement, breach of trust, &c, . . . 424 
 Intemperance and suicide have very often been the consequences of this 
 
 system, 424 
 
 The effects of drawing prizes upon those who have drawn them, noticed, 425 
 A comparison between the lottery system and ordinary gaming, .... 425 
 Tendency of this system to raise up idlers, gamesters, &c, ....*. 427 
 
XXVlll ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENTS. 
 
 CHAPTER V. Duelling. 
 
 Difficulty of treating this subject by argument, because the advocates of this 
 practice do not defend it in this way, 428 
 
 The paper left by Alexander Hamilton reprinted (in a note), and its reason- 
 ings carefully analyzed, 429 
 
 CHAPTER VI. Theatrical Amusements. 
 
 Sentiments of the Old Congress respecting these amusements, 432 
 
 The chief objections felt by the great body of serious Christians against 
 theatres and theatrical amusements, stated, 433 
 
 CHAPTER VII. Immoral Influence of Skepticism. 
 
 The skeptical system subverts the foundation of morals, 438 
 
 Its influence on the formation of character is most disastrous, 443 
 
 Especially it nourishes vanity (egotism), ferocity, and sensuality, .... 444 
 
 CONCLUSION. 
 
 Review of the Means which may be relied upon to improve the 
 Moral Condition of Mankind, and to advance Human Happiness. 
 
 The moral condition of mankind may be improved, 
 
 1. By the extension of Christianity in the earth, . . . j 453 
 
 2. By extending education and general intelligence, 457 
 
 3. By extending freedom and well-regulated free institutions, 462 
 
 4. By the effectual prohibition of gaming, the lottery system, &c, . , . 463 
 
 5. By correcting public opinion through the press, the pulpit, &c, . . . 464 
 Every thing promotive of good morals, is preeminently productive of hap- 
 piness ; but, to secure this last end, we must more particularly rely 
 
 1. On still further inventions in labor-saving machinery, 468 
 
 2. On the reformation of our criminal law, and the codification of our law 
 generally , so far as the nature of the case permits, ........ 471 
 
 3. On the penitentiary system, contemplated as a means of meliorating the 
 condition of mankind, 480 
 
 4. On applying the principles of insurance more extensively than they have 
 been hitherto applied, 485 
 
 5. On the prevalence of the spirit and principles of peace 490 
 
ELEMENTS 
 
 OF 
 
 MORAL PHILOSOPHY 
 
 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES AND DISCUSSIONS. 
 
 Man may be viewed under several aspects, — he consists 
 of body and soul, — he has both an animal and a rational na- 
 ture, — he is both an intellectual and a moral being, — he re- 
 quires an education suited to his circumstances in this life, 
 and to his destiny and prospects in the life to come. On these 
 several parts of human nature, several sciences have been found- 
 ed, having for their object to investigate and explain the struc- 
 ture of the human body, and the faculties of the human un- 
 derstanding. These several branches of human nature, — the 
 animal, intellectual, and moral, have been recognised at all times 
 and by all nations ; and the distinctions on which they rest, are 
 even seen in the structure of every language.* It is the object 
 
 * u Words are signs of thought; and from words themselves (without follow- 
 ing them through all their inflexions and combinations in the finished structure 
 of a language) we may see into the natural feelings and judgments of men 7 
 before they become warped by the prejudices of sect, or the subtilties of sys- 
 tem. If, in reading the ancient writers, we meet with words describing virtue 
 and vice, honor and dishonor, guilt and shame, coupled with the strongest 
 epithets of praise or condemnation ; then we are certain that those things ex- 
 isted as realities before they became words ; or at least, that in the minds of 
 those, who, during the early progress of society, built up the ancient languages, 
 they were considered as realities ; and on that account (and that account on- 
 ly) had their representatives among the symbols of thought. I believe we 
 might in this way make a near approach to a true system of moral philosophy ; 
 and our progress would at every step record a series of judgments, not derived 
 1 
 
2 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 of Moral Philosophy, to investigate the moral constitution of 
 man and the appropriate sphere of his duties ; to determine the 
 standard by which the various branches of duty may be meas- 
 ured ; and to prescribe rules for our guidance in the principal 
 employments and situations in which men may be called to act, 
 and in the chief relations of life which they are accustomed to 
 sustain. 
 
 In moral philosophy, as in most other sciences, there is a 
 practical part, and a part which may be called theoretical or 
 speculative ; and, in respect to the last of these, we shall 
 perceive, by adverting to the history of Ethics, that there has 
 been quite the usual diversity of sentiment which we are accus- 
 tomed to see among men. Socrates, usually called among 
 the ancients the Prince of Philosophers, maintained, that an 
 action, to be good, must be both useful and honorable (utile 
 et honestum) ; and he was accustomed to express the strongest 
 disapprobation of those, who, holding that an action might be 
 useful without being honorable, first drew a distinction between 
 the usefulness and the rectitude of an action.* According to 
 Plato, virtue consists in that state of mind in which every 
 faculty confines itself within its proper sphere, without en- 
 croaching upon that of any other, and performs its proper 
 office with that precise degree of strength and vigor which 
 belongs to it.f In the view of Aristotle, each particular virtue 
 lies in a kind of medium between two opposite vices, of 
 which the one offends by being too much, the other by 
 being too little, affected by a particular species of objects. 
 Thus the virtue of fortitude or courage lies in the medium 
 between the opposite vices of cowardice and of presumptuous 
 rashness, of which the one offends from being too much, and 
 
 from any doubtful train of reasoning, but forced on men by the very condition 
 of their existence." Again, " The judgment of conscience, declaring to us 
 that we are responsible for our deeds, is recorded in the language and institu- 
 tions of every civilized nation in the history of the world. If this does not 
 satisfy the metaphysician, it is at least enough for the Christian moralist, whose 
 rule of life is simple, and whose light is clear." — Professor Sedgwick, on the 
 Studies of the University of Cambridge, pp. 33, 70. 
 
 * Cic. De Off. Lib. III. c. 3. 
 
 i Smith's Theory of Moral Sentiments, Vol. II. p. 69. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 3 
 
 the other from being too little, affected by objects of fear. 
 Thus, too, the virtue of frugality lies half way between avarice 
 and profusion, of which the one consists in an excess, the 
 other in a defect, of the proper attention to the objects of self- 
 interest. Magnanimity, in the same manner, consists in a me- 
 dium between the excess of arrogance and the defect of pusil- 
 lanimity, of which the one consists in too extravagant, the 
 other in too weak, a sentiment of our own worth and dignity. 
 This view is well expressed by Horace, — 
 
 Est modus in rebus; sunt certi denique fines, 
 Quos ultra citraque nequit consistere rectum.* 
 
 Aristotle also made virtue to consist in practical habits ; and, in 
 doing this, he probably designed to oppose the doctrine of Plato, 
 who seems to have been of the opinion, that just sentiments and 
 reasonable judgments, concerning what was fit to be done or to 
 be avoided, were alone sufficient to constitute the most perfect 
 virtue. Virtue, according to Plato, might be considered as a 
 species of science ; and no man, he supposed, could see clearly 
 and demonstratively what was right and what was wrong, without' 
 acting accordingly. Passion might make us act contrary to 
 doubtful and uncertain opinions, not to plain and evident judg- 
 ments. Aristotle, on the contrary, was of opinion, that no con- 
 viction of the understanding merely, was capable of insuring a 
 control over inveterate habits, and that good morals consisted 
 not so much in knowledge, as in action. f 
 
 According to Zeno, the founder of the Stoical doctrines, 
 virtue consisted in choosing and rejecting all different objects 
 and circumstances, according as they were by nature rendered 
 more or less the objects of choice or rejection ; in selecting al- 
 ways, from among the several objects of choice presented to us, 
 those which were most to be chosen, when we could not obtain 
 them all ; and in selecting too, out of the several objects of re- 
 jection offered to us, those which were least to be avoided, when 
 it was not in our power to avoid them all. By choosing and 
 rejecting with this just and accurate discernment, by thus be- 
 stowing upon every object the precise degree of attention it de- 
 
 * Sat. I. i. 106, 107. I Smith's Moral Sentiments, Vol. II. p. 70= 
 
4 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 served, according to the place which it held in this natural scale 
 of things, was maintained, in the view of the Stoics, that perfect 
 rectitude of conduct, which constituted the essence of virtue. 
 This was what they called living consistently, living according to 
 nature (convenienter naturae vivere), and obeying those laws and 
 directions which nature, or the author of nature, has prescribed 
 for our conduct.* 
 
 The system of Epicurus agreed with those of Plato, Aris- 
 totle, and Zeno, in making virtue to consist in acting in the most 
 ->vsuitable manner to obtain the primary objects (prima natural) of 
 natural desire. It differed from them all in two respects ; 1. 
 in the account which it gave of those primary objects of natural 
 desire, and, 2. in the account which it gave of the excellence 
 of virtue, or of the reason why that quality ought to be esteemed. 
 
 The primary objects of natural desire consisted, according to 
 Epicurus, in bodily pleasure and pain, and in nothing else ; 
 whereas, according to the other abovenamed philosophers, there 
 were many other objects, such as knowledge, such as the happiness 
 of our relations, of our friends and of our country, which were 
 ultimately desirable for their own sakes. Virtue, moreover, ac- 
 cording to Epicurus, did not deserve to be pursued for its own 
 sake, nor was itself one of the ultimate objects of natural appe- 
 tite, but was eligible only upon account of its tendency to pre- 
 vent pain and to procure ease and pleasure. In the opinion of 
 the other philosophers, on the contrary, virtue was desirable, not 
 merely as the means of procuring the other primary objects of 
 natural desire, but as something which was in itself more valua- 
 ble than all of them.f 
 
 Nor has this diversity of sentiment on the theory of morals 
 been confined to the ancient philosophers. Modern writers have 
 not concurred in their views on the theoretical part of the sub- 
 ject. The opinion of Dr. Samuel Clarke is, that moral obliga- 
 tion is to be referred to the eternal and necessary differences of 
 things ; and he makes virtue to consist in acting suitably to the 
 different relations in which we stand. Wollaston's theory is, 
 that moral good and evil consist in a conformity or disagreement 
 
 * Smith's Moral Sentiments, Vol. II. p. 71. t Idem, p. 93. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 5 
 
 with truth, in treating every thing as being what it is. Lord 
 Shaftesbury makes virtue to consist in maintaining a proper bal- 
 ance of the affections, and in allowing no passion to go beyond 
 its proper sphere. Dr. Paley teaches, that it is the utility of 
 any action alone, which constitutes the obligation of it.* Dr. 
 Adam Smith resolves moral obligation into propriety, arising 
 from feelings of sympathy. Mr. Bush considers the communi- 
 cated will of God the grand expositor of human duty ; while 
 Dymond says, that this will not merely declares the distinction 
 between right and wrong in regard to moral conduct, but also 
 is itself the constituting cause of moral good and evil.f The 
 immutable principles of morality necessarily result, says Dr. 
 Appleton, from the nature of things, and from the relations which 
 they have to one another. As God is the author of all things, 
 the relations subsisting between them may be considered as de- 
 pending on him. But, while objects continue in all respects as 
 they are, no change can be produced in their relations. It is 
 absurd, continues he, to ascribe to Deity the power of changing 
 vice into virtue, or virtue into vice 4 Right and wrong, says 
 Dr. Price, denote what a&tjons are. Now whatever any thing 
 is, that it is, not by will, or decree, or power, but by nature and 
 necessity. Again, the natures of things being immutable, what- 
 ever we suppose the natures of actions to be, that they must be 
 immutably. If they are indifferent, this indifference is itself 
 immutable. The same is to be said of right and wrong, moral ^ 
 good and evil, as far as they express real characters of actions. 
 They must immutably and necessarily belong to those actions, 
 of which they are truly affirmed. § u God hath given us," says 
 Bishop Butler, u a moral faculty, by which we distinguish be- 
 tween actions, and approve some as virtuous and of good desert, 
 and disapprove others as vicious and of ill desert. This moral ' 
 discernment," continues he, "implies a rule of action, and a rule 
 of a very peculiar kind ; for it carries in it authority and a 
 right of decision ; authority in such a sense, that we cannot 
 
 * Ipsa utilitas, justi prope mater et aequi. — Hor. Sat, I. iii. 98. 
 
 t See Editor's Preface to Dymond's Essays, p. 7. t Addresses, p. 103. 
 
 § Review of Questions on Morals, p. 37. 
 
6 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 depart from it without being self-condemned. And the dictates 
 of this moral faculty, which are by nature a rule to us, are more- 
 over the laws of God, laws in a sense including sanctions."* 
 But, as great as has been the diversity of opinion and defi- 
 nition in regard to the theoretical part of morals, there has been 
 a coincidence of sentiment on the 'practical part of the subject, 
 as remarkable as it is gratifying. In truth, it may well be doubt- 
 ed, whether, beyond the pale of the exact sciences, there has 
 been on any subject an equal concurrence of sentiment among 
 mankind. " There is no tribe," says the late Sir James Mack- 
 intosh, " so rude as to be without a faint perception of a differ- 
 ence between right and wrong ; there is no subject on which 
 men of all ages and nations coincide in so many points as in the 
 general rules of conduct, and in the qualities of the human char- 
 acter which deserve esteem. Even the grossest deviations from 
 the general consent," continues he, u will appear on close ex- 
 amination to be, not so much corruptions of moral feelings, as 
 either ignorance of facts, or errors with respect to the conse- 
 quences of action- or cases in which the dissentient party is in- 
 consistent with other parts of his own principles, which destroys 
 the value of his dissent ; or where each dissident is condemned 
 by all the other dissidents, which immeasurably augments the 
 majority against him." Again he says, "If we bear in mind, 
 that the question relates to the coincidence of all men in con- 
 sidering the same qualities as virtues, and not to the preference 
 of one class of virtues by some, and of a different class by 
 others, the exceptions from the agreement of mankind in their 
 system of practical morality will be reduced to absolute insig- 
 nificance ; and we shall learn to view them as no more affecting 
 the harmony of our moral faculties, than the resemblance of the 
 limbs and features is affected by monstrous conformations, or by 
 the unfortunate effects of accident or disease, in a very few in- 
 dividuals."! The same distinguished writer says of Grotius, 
 who had cited poets, orators, historians, and philosophers, that 
 " he quotes them as witnesses whose conspiring testimony, might- 
 ily strengthened and confirmed by their discordance on almost 
 
 * Butler's Works, p. 134. London, 1828. 
 t Progress of Ethical Philosophy, pp. 9, 10. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 7 
 
 every other subject, is a conclusive proof of the unanimity of 
 the whole human race on the great rules of duty and the fun- 
 damental principles of morals." * 
 
 44 The object of Grotius," says Chancellor Kent, u was to 
 correct the false theories and pernicious maxims of his time, 
 by showing a community of sentiment among the wise and learn- 
 ed of all nations and ages, in favor of the natural law of mo- 
 rality." Again he says, " Grotius went purposely into the de- 
 tails of history and the usages of nations, and resorted to the 
 testimony of philosophers, historians, orators, poets, civilians, 
 and divines, because they were the materials out of which the 
 science of morality was formed ; and when many men, at different 
 times and places, unanimously affirmed the same thing for truth, 
 it ought to be ascribed to some universal cause." f u Mr. Hume," 
 says Sir James Mackintosh again, " at the same time that he in- 
 geniously magnifies the moral heresies of two nations so polished 
 as the Athenians and the French, still says, c In how many cir- 
 cumstances would an Athenian and a Frenchman of merit re- 
 semble each other ? Humanity, fidelity, truth, justice, courage, \ 
 temperance, constancy, dignity of mind.' Of this conclusion it 
 has been well said, that Mr. Hume has very satisfactorily re- 
 solved his own difficulties ; and that almost every deviation which 
 he imputes to each nation, is at variance with some of the vir- 
 tues justly esteemed by both ; and that the reciprocal condemna- 
 tion of each other's errors, which appears in his statement, enti- 
 tles us, on these points, to strike out the suffrages of both, when 
 collecting the general judgment of mankind." J 
 
 " The sentiments upon which men differ so greatly," says 
 Voltaire, "are not necessary to men; it is even impossible 
 that they should be necessary, for this reason alone, that the 
 truth respecting them is hidden from us. It was indispensable, 
 that all fathers and mothers should love their children ; there- 
 fore they do love them. It was necessary that there should be 
 some general principles of morals, in order that society might 
 subsist ; therefore these principles are the same among all civil- 
 
 * Discourse on the Law of Nations, p. 24. London, 1828. 
 f Commentaries on American Law, Vol. I. pp. 16, 17. 
 X Mackintosh's Progress of Ethical Philosophy, p. 10. 
 
 \ 
 
8 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 ized nations. Whatever is an eternal subject of dispute is 
 always useless." # u We have implanted in us by Providence," 
 says Mr. Burke, " ideas, axioms, rules, of what is pious, just, 
 fair, honest, which no political craft, nor learned sophistry, can 
 entirely expel from our breasts." f 
 
 Lord Karnes, after an imposing array of exceptions, says ; 
 u These facts tend not to disprove the reality of a common sense 
 in morals ; they only prove, that the moral sense has not been 
 equally perfect at all times, nor in all countries. A nation, 
 like an individual, ripens gradually, and acquires a refined taste 
 in morals as well as in the fine arts ; after which we find great 
 uniformity of opinion about the rules of right and wrong ; with 
 few exceptions, but what may proceed from imbecility or cor- 
 rupted education. There may be found, it is true, even in the 
 most enlightened ages, men who have singular notions in mo- 
 rality, and in many other subjects ; which no more affords an 
 argument against a common sense or standard of right and wrong, 
 than a monster doth against the standard that regulates our ex- 
 ternal form, or than an exception doth against the truth of a 
 general proposition." Again he says, " That there is in man- 
 kind a uniformity of opinion with respect to right and wrong, 
 is a matter of fact, of which the only infallible evidence is ob- 
 servation and experience, and to that evidence I appeal. This 
 uniformity of sentiment, which may be termed the common sense 
 of mankind with respect to right and wrong, is essential to 
 x social beings. Did the moral sentiments of men differ as much 
 as their faces, they would be unfit for society ; discord and 
 controversy would be endless, and the law of the strongest 
 would be the only rule of right and wrong." J 
 
 All men, then, agree, that there are acts which ought to be 
 done, and acts which ought not to be done ; the far greater part 
 - N of mankind agree in their list of virtues and duties, of vices and 
 crimes ; and the whole human race, as it advances in other im- 
 provements, is as evidently tending towards the moral system of 
 the most cultivated nations, as children, in their growth, tend to 
 
 * Lettre a Madame la Marquise du Deffand. f Works, Vol. I. p. 41. 
 X Sketches of. Man, Vol. IV. pp. 19-21, 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 9 
 
 the opinions as much as to the experience of full-grown men.* 
 William Penn, in the council and consultation "which he held 
 with the Indians of his province in 1683, found that these 
 savages believed in a state of future retribution, and that the 
 vices enumerated by them, as those which would consign them 
 to punishment, corresponded remarkably with similar enume- 
 rations in the Christian Scriptures. They said that lying, 
 theft, swearing, murder, and the like, would expose them to 
 punishment in a future life ; and the New Testament affirms, that 
 those who are guilty of adultery, fornication, lying, theft, mur- 
 der, &c, shall not inherit the kingdom of God." f We may con- 
 clude, therefore, with Dr. Hartley, that "the rule of life drawn 
 from the practice and opinions of mankind, corrects and im- 
 proves itself perpetually, till at last it determines entirely for 
 virtue, and excludes all kinds and degrees of vice. "J 
 
 But this position admits of still further authoritative confirma- 
 tion. " History," says Sir James Mackintosh, " is now a vast 
 museum, in which specimens of every variety of human nature 
 may be studied. From those great accessions to knowledge, 
 lawgivers and statesmen, but above all, moralists and political 
 philosophers, may reap the most important instruction. They 
 may plainly discover, in all the useful and beautiful variety of 
 governments and institutions, and under all the fantastic multi- 
 tude of usages and rites which have prevailed among men, the 
 same fundamental, comprehensive truths, the same master prin- 
 ciples which are the guardians of human society, recognised and 
 revered (with few and slight exceptions) by every nation upon 
 earth, and uniformly taught (with still fewer exceptions) by a 
 succession of wise men from the first dawn of speculation to 
 the present moment. The exceptions, few as they are, will, on 
 more reflection, be found rather apparent than real. If we 
 could raise ourselves to that height from which we ought to 
 survey so vast a subject, these exceptions would altogether van- 
 ish ; the brutality of a handful of savages would disappear 
 in the immense prospect of human nature, and the murmurs of 
 
 * Mackintosh's Progress of Ethical Philosophy, p. 1 1. 
 
 t See Dymond's Essays on Morality, pp. 72, 73. 
 
 t Quoted by Sir James Mackintosh in his Progress, &c, p. 11. 
 
 2 
 
10 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 a few licentious sophists would not ascend to break the general 
 harmony. This consent of mankind in first principles, and this 
 endless variety in their application, which is one among many 
 valuable truths which we may collect from our present exten- 
 sive acquaintance with the history of man, is itself of vast im- 
 portance."* 
 
 Dr. Paley has, it is true, presented an imposing array of vices 
 and crimes practised in some age or country, and countenanced 
 by public opinion ; but, in doing this, he has most manifestly 
 mistaken the exceptions for the rules which govern human sen- 
 timents and conduct. This might be made very clear by a 
 careful analysis of the subject ; but it may be still more satis- 
 factory to permit Dr. Paley to destroy his own position, by cit- 
 ing his authority against himself. cc The direct object of Chris- 
 tianity," says this valuable writer, "is to supply motives and 
 not rules, sanctions and not precepts. And these," continues 
 he, " were what mankind stood most in need of. The mem- 
 bers of civilized society can, in all ordinary cases, judge toler- 
 ably well how they ought to act ; but, without a future state, 
 or, which is the same thing, without credited evidence of that 
 state, they want a motive to their duty ; they want at least 
 strength of motive sufficient to bear up against the force of pas- 
 sion, and the temptation of present advantage."! This obser- 
 vation rests entirely on the admission, that men substantially 
 concur in their views of practical morals. Again, he says, 
 still more decisively, " that moralists, from whatever different 
 principles they set out, commonly meet in their conclusions ; 
 that is, they enjoin the same conduct, prescribe the same rules 
 of duty, and, with a few exceptions, deliver upon dubious cases 
 the same determinations."^ Here we have the clear and deci- 
 sive authority of Dr. Paley himself, in favor of the substantial 
 agreement of mankind in the department of practical morals. 
 This general concurrence of sentiment lays a firm and safe foun- 
 dation on which to build a superstructure. 
 
 The practical department of moral philosophy contemplates 
 
 * Discourse on the Law of Nations, pp. 35, 36. 
 
 t Evidences of Christianity, p. 224. London, 1825. 
 
 t Moral and Political Philosophy, pp. 34, 35. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 11 
 
 two objects ; the formation and cultivation of a permanent, 
 strong, and delicate sense of duty ; and a knowledge of the 
 chief principles and rules, which determine our duty in the va- 
 rious situations and relations of life. 
 
 It may be said with the most perfect truth, that there is no 
 quality of the human character so fundamental as the possession 
 of a high and permanent sense of duty. It is composed of the 
 choicest elements of character, the passions under the control of 
 the reason, the will directed by the understanding, a conscience 
 alive to the most delicate moral impressions, and suitable motives 
 steadily and effectually influencing the conduct. It is something 
 more than an upright intention ; this is often seen in persons 
 whose sense of duty is comparatively slight ; it includes an ac- 
 tive, vigilant, persevering desire of practical usefulness. 
 
 The sense of duty gives a tone to the entire character and 
 conduct of the man. It leads him to act from fixed and well 
 considered principles of action, and not from passion, preju- 
 dice, and the impulse of the occasion and of the moment. The 
 supreme object in the mind of every good man is, the upright 
 discharge of the full measure of his duty ; and in this discharge 
 consist the highest honor and happiness, which human nature is 
 capable of attaining. Cicero well says, " No part of life, public 
 or private, in the business of the forum or in domestic affairs, 
 in regard to ourselves or as we stand in relation to other men, is 
 without the obligation of duty, and in the discharge of these 
 obligations consists all the honor of life ; as, on the other hand, 
 all baseness and dishonor spring from the neglect of them."* 
 Every man, then, has his own sphere of duty., his peculiar field 
 of usefulness, the cultivation or neglect of which will inevitably*" 
 lead to honor or dishonor, approbation or reproach, general 
 credit or public shame, to the torments of remorse on the one 
 hand, or on the other to the peace of mind which passeth all 
 understanding. f 
 
 A sense of duty, therefore, includes all the qualities of mind 
 and heart which are accustomed to be esteemed most valuable, 
 
 * De Officiis, Lib. I. c. 2. 
 
 t See Mackintosh on the Study and Practice of the Law, pp. 20 - 26. 
 
12 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 and which, in their practice, have ever been found most difficult. 
 Its exercise requires physical courage of the highest order, as 
 it sometimes brings us into collision with the passions and in- 
 terests of the powerful. It requires moral courage of an equally 
 high order, as it may compel us to meet and to brave the frowns, 
 the rebukes, and the scorn of public opinion. It implies a sac- 
 rifice of ease, as it calls for patient labor and unremitting ac- 
 tivity. Apparent self-interest must frequently be sacrificed to 
 its dictates ; for the cases are not few, in which duty seems to 
 call one way and interest another. Magnanimity is necessary to 
 its full exercise, since this many times requires us to pass by 
 the neglect, the provocations, and the overbearing conduct of 
 other men. It requires us to fulfil the law of Christian love, 
 by regarding and treating every man as our neighbour, whose 
 comfort and interest it is in our power to consult, and whose 
 welfare, moral or spiritual, it is in our power to advance. All 
 these qualities, and many more, so trying to human nature, and 
 requiring in their exercise the best qualities of the heart and of 
 the understanding, are combined in the sense of duty, when 
 most perfectly cultivated and matured. 
 
 The sense of duty being thus complex, — consisting of the 
 choicest elements of feeling, sentiment, and action, is difficult to 
 be analyzed completely, — we must, therefore, be contented with 
 such an imperfect analysis, as, with the aid of the preceding ob- 
 servations, we can make. It embraces, — 1. A moral sense, 
 that is, a sense of moral obligation and responsibility. 2. The 
 having a reasonable, definite, and valuable object of pursuit in 
 life, and the being governed in our conduct by moral and religious 
 rules. No one can have any sense of duty who is conscious of 
 living for no purpose, and of being governed by no moral rule.* 
 3. In a Christian country, and in a cultivated state of society, it 
 further consists in a supreme regard to the authority of God, and 
 a regard for all other men viewed as brethren of the same great 
 family. 4. A conscientious regulation of our lives and conver- 
 sations with reference to the rewards and punishments of the life 
 to come as well as of the present life. 5. Industry, activity, 
 
 * Paley's Moral and Political Philosophy, p. 30. — Persius, Sat. III. 60-62. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 13 
 
 patience, and perseverance, in the sphere of duty and usefulness, 
 however humble, which, in the order of Providence, has been 
 assigned us. 
 
 No man supremely devoted to habits of self-indulgence, self- 
 gratification, personal ease, and sloth, can be much under the in- 
 fluence of a sense of duty. It is this sense of duty, which is the 
 mainspring of all that is noble and praiseworthy in human char- 
 acter and conduct; and it is this especially, which it is the object 
 of moral philosophy to strengthen and otherwise cultivate. It is 
 this sense of duty, which has led men of the best hopes and 
 talents in every age and nation, without expectation of reward, 
 to devote themselves to the service of their country and the 
 good of mankind. It was this sense of duty, which led Wash- 
 ington and his illustrious compatriots to undertake the arduous 
 and unpromising enterprise of the American revolution, and to 
 sustain the labors, hardships, discouragements, and the thousand 
 other trials, by which they wrought out the political salvation of 
 their country. It was this which led the philanthropic Howard 
 " to visit all Europe, — not to survey the sumptuousness of 
 palaces, or the stateliness of temples ; not to make accurate 
 measurements of the remains of ancient grandeur, not to form a 
 scale of the curiosity of modern arts, nor to collect medals or 
 collate manuscripts ; — but to dive into the depths of dungeons ; 
 to plunge into the infection of hospitals, to survey the mansions 
 of sorrow and pain ; to take the gauge and dimensions of misery, 
 depression, and contempt ; to remember the forgotten, to attend to 
 the neglected, to visit the forsaken, and compare and collate 
 the distresses of all men in all countries. " # It was this, which 
 led the apostles of our Saviour, and other early preachers of his 
 gospel and original witnesses of his miracles, voluntarily to sub- 
 ject themselves to unexampled labors, dangers, and sufferings, in 
 attestation of the accounts which they delivered, and solely in 
 consequence of their belief of these accounts, and, from the same 
 motives, to submit to new and unusual rules of life and conduct. f 
 It is the same sense of duty, which has led the preachers of 
 Christianity, in every age, to devote themselves to the intellectual, 
 
 * Mr. Burke's Eulogium. i See Paley's Evidences of Christianity. 
 
14 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 moral, and spiritual interests of mankind, with a zeal, a disinter- 
 estedness, and a perseverance, unknown to any other class of men. 
 And it is this, moreover, which is, at this time, leading many 
 Christian missionaries to forsake friends, parents, country, and all 
 earthly prospects, for the sake of planting the standard of the 
 Cross in the remotest corners of the earth. 
 
 It has before been said, that the sense of duty implies a moral 
 sense, — an authoritative standard of human conduct. Now, the 
 decisions of the conscience of each individual are, with respect 
 to him, the authoritative rules of his conduct, and the supreme 
 and ultimate guide of his life. The conscience is that principle 
 of the mind, whose prerogative it is to prescribe, in morals, to 
 every other, and to pronounce the definitive sentence from which 
 there is no appeal. The fundamental importance of this position, 
 and especially the present state of public sentiment, of literature, 
 and of intellectual philosophy, and the prevailing habits of think- 
 ing and reasoning, render some illustration of it useful and ne- 
 cessary. 
 
 To an unsophisticated mind, it may appear surprising, that it 
 should be necessary to delay, for the sake of establishing the 
 existence of conscience in the human breast, or of vindicating its 
 claim to be the great and ultimate guide of the moral sentiments 
 and actions of mankind. And, if some traces of the same error 
 and perversion are found in the writings of the ancient moralists, 
 — still it may be said, with the utmost truth, to have been re- 
 served for very late times, to build up and sanction a system of 
 sophistry in metaphysics and morals, which, by denying the ex- 
 istence, has obscured the decisions of conscience, and has thus 
 been enabled to substitute a false measure of human duty, and 
 a standard of right and wrong in human conduct, which must fluc- 
 tuate with the ever-varying prejudices, passions, opinions, and 
 interests of mankind. A succession of eminent writers, led on 
 by the celebrated David Hume, have, within the last century, 
 given plausibility and currency to the theory, that the utility of 
 actions is the only criterion of their rectitude, and the supreme 
 standard of their obligation. This theory of morals, as unsound 
 and superficial as it is, which makes virtue a subject of calcu- 
 lation, and, withdrawing the attention from all internal sentiments, 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 15 
 
 as well as destroying their authority, loses sight of the essential 
 distinction between right and wrong, and confounds the boun- 
 daries of vice and virtue, having been incautiously admitted by 
 Dr. Paley as the basis of his moral system, has acquired a 
 degree of public confidence and favor, which, under the auspices 
 of a less respectable and estimable name, it could never have 
 attained. 
 
 By this theory, the jurisdiction of conscience is abolished, her 
 decisions are classed with those of a superannuated judge, and 
 the determination of moral causes is adjourned from the interior 
 tribunal of the breast to the noisy forum of speculative debate. 
 Nothing is yielded to the suggestions of conscience, nothing to 
 the movements of the heart ; every thing is dealt out with a 
 sparing hand, under the stint and measure of calculation. In 
 making expediency the ground of all moral obligation, Dr. Paley 
 could not have anticipated to what lengths his doctrine would 
 be carried, or to what purposes, in other hands, it would be ap- 
 plied under the sanction of his name, or how completely it might 
 be made to subvert morality and religion, by substituting the 
 looseness of speculation and opinion for the stability of fixed 
 principle. The utility of an action, may, as will hereafter be 
 seen, be very suitably made a subordinate criterion of its rec- 
 titude^ but can never be made the ultimate and supreme standard 
 of all right and wrong, without degrading virtue to the rank of an 
 ordinary problem in arithmetic. Let us return, then, to the safe 
 and sober paths of our ancestors, adhering, in all moral questions, 
 to the dictates of conscience, regulated and otherwise enlight- 
 ened ; happy to enjoy, instead of the sparks of our own kindling, 
 the benefit of that light, which, placed in the moral firmament by 
 an Almighty hand, has led, in the way of safety, all who have 
 been willing to trust to its guidance. 
 
 Nor, in submitting to be guided by the doctrine of expediency 
 on moral subjects, have we deviated less from the example of 
 heathen antiquity than from the way of our sober and pious 
 Christian ancestors. "The philosophers of (heathen) antiquity," 
 says a most valuable writer, " in the absence of superior light, 
 consulted with reverence the permanent principles of nature, the 
 dictates of conscience, and the best feelings of the heart, which 
 
16 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 they employed all the powers of reason and eloquence to unfold, 
 to adorn, to enforce ; and thereby formed a luminous commen- 
 tary on the law written on the heart. The virtue which they 
 inculcated grew out of the stock of human nature ; it was a warm 
 and living virtue. It was the moral man, possessing, in every 
 limb and feature, in all its figure and movements, the harmony, 
 dignity, and variety, which belong to the human form ; an effort of 
 unassisted nature to restore that image of God, which sin had 
 mutilated and defaced. Imperfect, as might be expected, their 
 morality was often erroneous ; but in its great outlines, it had all 
 the stability of the human constitution, and its fundamental prin- 
 ciples were coeval and coexistent with human nature. There 
 could be nothing fluctuating and arbitrary in its more weighty 
 decisions, since it appealed every moment to the man within the 
 breast ; it pretended to nothing more than to give voice and ar- 
 ticulation to the inward sentiments of the heart, and conscience 
 echoed to its oracles. This, wrought into different systems and 
 under various modes of illustration, was the general form which 
 morality exhibited from the creation of the world till our time."* 
 
 Aristotle has discriminated, classified, and arranged the ele- 
 ments of social morals, which alone he could treat, in the absence 
 of revelation, with the acuteness, precision, and skill, with which 
 he was so eminently endowed ; and whoever peruses his " Nico- 
 machian Morals," will find a perpetual reference to the inward 
 sentiments of the breast. He builds every thing on human na- 
 ture, and always takes it for granted, that there is a moral facul- 
 ty in the mind, to which, without looJcing elsewhere, we may 
 safely appeal. He has been styled the interpreter of nature, 
 and has certainly shown himself a most able commentator on 
 the law written in the heart. In like manner, Cicero drew his 
 moral sentiments from the undefiled fountain of an unsophisticated 
 conscience, and vindicated the claims of this faculty with equal 
 decision and clearness. 
 
 In this state, revelation found the moral system of the an- 
 cients, and by correcting what was erroneous, supplying what 
 was defective, and above all, confirming what was right by its 
 
 * Robert Hall's Works, Vol. I. p. 97. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 17 
 
 peculiar sanctions of a future life of rewards and punishments, it 
 conferred on it that perfection, of which it is itself the consum- 
 mation. We have, then, with some comparatively late excep- 
 tions, the concurring authority of ancient and modern times, for 
 making conscience the umpire in all moral inquiries. But to 
 give more definiteness as well as expansion to our views on this 
 fundamental point, it may still be useful to review very briefly 
 the chief considerations and arguments, on which the doctrine of 
 a conscience in the human breast may be made to rest.* 
 
 1. We may do much towards convincing ourselves of the exist- 
 ence and office of conscience, by consulting our own personal 
 experience. Our recollections must inform us, with what effect, 
 when children, an appeal was made to the admonitions of our 
 own breasts, if at any time we had been guilty of injustice, false- 
 hood, cruelty, or any other species of wrong-doing. Remorse is 
 a peculiar and well-defined feeling, the most painful of all human 
 sufferings. Its stings do not seem to spring from reason, from 
 judgment, from memory, from imagination ; — they seem, on the 
 contrary, to spring from a distinct faculty of the mind, — a con- 
 science. When we find that the great principles of rectitude 
 have been violated by human tribunals, we familiarly speak of the 
 difference between the decisions of the forum humanum, and 
 the forum conscientice ; and, in doing this, we refer to the un- 
 perverted decisions of the conscience, called, in the Roman 
 Law,f by a most noble and significant metaphor, the interior 
 forum. 
 
 2. We shall see still further proof of the existence of con- 
 science, by the observations we must have made on the feelings, 
 sentiments, and actions of those with whom we have been ac- 
 customed to hold intercourse. We have the same evidence of 
 the existence of conscience in those with whom we converse, 
 and otherwise maintain intercourse, which we have of memory, 
 imagination, or any other faculty of the mind. In addressing all 
 other men, we assume that they are governed by a moral sense, 
 or conscience, to which we may successfully appeal. "It is 
 
 * See Robert Hall's Works, Vol. I. pp. 89/97, 99, 101. 
 t North American Review, Vol. XXII. p. 260. — Story's Commentaries on 
 Equity, Vol. I. chap. 1, passim. 
 
 3 
 
18 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 manifest," says Bishop Butler, " great part of common language 
 and of common behaviour over the world, is founded upon the 
 supposition of a moral faculty, whether called conscience, moral 
 reason, moral sense, or divine reason ; whether considered as a 
 sentiment of the understanding or as a perception of the heart, 
 or, which seems the truth, as including both." Again, he says 
 of conscience, " To preside and govern, from the very economy 
 and constitution of man, belongs to it. This faculty was placed 
 within to be our proper governor, to direct and regulate all undue 
 principles, passions, and motives of action. It carries its own 
 authority with it, that it is our natural guide, the guide assigned 
 us by the Author of our nature." * 
 
 3. The substantial uniformity and consistency, which, as has 
 been stated and illustrated above, f mankind have manifested in 
 all ages in regard to practical morals, are most naturally and fully 
 accounted for by ascribing them to a peculiar faculty, a conscience. 
 From uniformity in the effeot, we infer sameness in the cause. 
 In government, literature, science, philosophy, taste, the fine 
 arts, theoretical morals, finally, on all subjects, except the exact 
 sciences and 'practical morals, men differ widely from each other 
 (Quot homines, tot sententice, says Terence,) in opinion and in 
 sentiment. 
 
 4. We may find evidence of the existence of a conscience 
 in the human breast, in the structure of languages, and in the 
 literature of various ages and nations. The language of a na- 
 tion is the most permanent and authentic record which can 
 exist, of the feelings, thoughts, sentiments, opinions, and con- 
 victions of the men who have formed, cultivated, and used it. 
 And all languages contain words, constructions, and forms of 
 expression, which spring from assuming the existence and func- 
 tions of a conscience. Literature, also, most intimately con- 
 nected as it is with language, offers its evidence to the same 
 effect. 
 
 5. It may be well to collect and embody some small part of 
 the testimony to the same effect, furnished by the most respect- 
 able and valuable writers. This testimony is of every kind, 
 premeditated and casual, designed and incidental. It is given 
 
 * Quoted by Dymond, Essays, p. 61. t See above, pp. 6-9. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 19 
 
 by divines, moralists, poets, orators, civilians, historians, philoso- 
 phers, and men of business. So much notice has before been 
 taken of the general tone and character of the ancient moralists, 
 that I may pass them by with a few citations. Plutarch says, 
 " The light of truth is a law, not written in tables or books, but 
 dwelling in the mind, always a living rule, which never permits 
 the soul to be destitute of an interior guide." Hiero says, 
 that the universal light, shining in the conscience, is u a domestic 
 God, a God within the hearts and souls of men." Epictetus 
 says, " God has assigned to each man a director, his own good 
 genius ; a guardian whose vigilance no slumbers interrupt, and 
 whom no false reasonings can deceive. So that, when you have 
 shut your door, say not that you are alone, for your God is 
 within. What need have you of outward light to discover what 
 is done, or to light to good actions, who have God, or that genius 
 or divine principle, for your light ? " 
 
 My quotations from modern writers will be much more nu- 
 merous. Dr. Hutcheson says, "The Author of nature has 
 much better furnished us for a virtuous conduct than our moralists 
 seem to imagine, by almost as quick and powerful instructions as 
 we have for the preservation of our bodies." Dr. Blair says, 
 " Conscience is felt to act as the delegate of an invisible ruler. 
 Conscience is the guide, or the enlightening or directing princi- 
 ple of our conduct." Again he says, " God has invested con- 
 science with authority to promulgate his laws." Dr. Rush says, 
 " It would seem as if the Supreme Being had preserved the 
 moral faculty in man from the ruins of his fall, on purpose to 
 guide him back again to Paradise ; and, at the same time, had 
 constituted the conscience, both in man and fallen spirits, a kind 
 of royalty in his moral empire, on purpose to show his property 
 in all intelligent creatures, and their original resemblance to him- 
 self." Again he says, " Happily for the human race, the inti- 
 mations of Deity and the road to happiness are not left to the 
 slow operations or doubtful inductions of reason. It is worthy 
 of notice, that, while second thoughts are best in matters of 
 judgment, first thoughts are always to be preferred in matters that 
 relate to morality." Lord Bacon says, " The light of nature not 
 only shines upon the human mind through the medium of a 
 
20 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 rational faculty, but by an internal instinct according to the law 
 of conscience, which is a sparkle of the purity of man's first 
 estate." Lord Shaftesbury says, " The sense of right and wrong 
 being as natural to us as natural affection itself, and being a first 
 principle in our constitution and make, there is no speculation, 
 opinion, persuasion, or belief, which is capable immediately or 
 directly to exclude or destroy it." Dr. Reid says, u The first 
 principles of morals are the immediate dictates of the moral 
 faculty. By the moral faculty or conscience solely, we have the 
 original conception of right and wrong. It is evident, that this 
 principle has, from its nature, authority to direct and determine 
 with regard to our conduct ; to judge, to acquit or condemn, 
 and even to punish ; an authority which belongs to no other 
 principle of the human mind. The Supreme Being has given us 
 this light within to direct our moral conduct. It is the candle 
 of the Lord set up within us, to guide our steps." Dr. Price 
 says, " Whatever our consciences dictate to us, that He (the 
 Deity) commands more evidently and undeniably, than if by a 
 voice from Heaven we had been called upon to do it." Dr. 
 Watts says, the mind " contains in it the plain and general prin- 
 ciples of morality, not explicitly as propositions, but only as na- 
 tive principles, by which it judges, and cannot but judge, virtue 
 to be fit and vice unfit." Dr. Cudworth says, " The anticipa- 
 tions of morality do not spring merely from notional ideas, or 
 from certain rules or propositions, arbitrarily printed upon the 
 soul as upon a book, but from some other more inward and vital 
 principle in intellectual beings as such, whereby they have a 
 natural determination in them to do some things and to avoid 
 others." Dr. Shepherd says, " This law is that innate sense of 
 right and wrong, of virtue and vice, which every man carries in 
 his own bosom. These impressions, operating on the mind of 
 man, bespeak a law written on his heart. This secret sense of 
 right and wrong, for wise purposes so deeply implanted by our 
 Creator in the human mind, has the nature, force, and effect of 
 a law." Dr. Southey speaks of u actions being tried by the 
 eternal standard of right and wrong, on which the unsophisticated 
 heart unerringly pronounces." Dr. Adam Smith says, "It is 
 altogether absurd and unintelligible, to suppose that the first per- 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 21 
 
 ceptions of right and wrong can be derived from reason. These 
 first perceptions cannot be the object of reason, but of immedi- 
 ate sense and feeling. Though man has been rendered the im- 
 mediate judge of mankind, an appeal lies from his sentence to a 
 much higher tribunal, to the tribunal of their own consciences, 
 to that of the man within the breast, the great judge and arbiter of 
 their conduct." " Conscience, conscience," exclaims Rousseau, 
 " divine instinct, immortal and heavenly voice, sure guide of a 
 being ignorant and limited, but intelligent and free, infallible judge 
 of good and evil, by which man is made like unto God." Again 
 he says, " Our own conscience is the most enlightened philos- 
 opher. There is no need to be acquainted with Tully's Offices 
 to make a man of probity ; and perhaps the most virtuous woman 
 in the world is the least acquainted with the definition of virtue." 
 Milton says, in regard to our first parents, 
 
 " And I will place within them, as a guide, 
 My umpire Conscience ; whom if they will hear, 
 Light after light well used they shall attain."* 
 
 Sir Matthew Hale says, " Any man that sincerely and truly fears 
 Almighty God, and calls and relies on him for his direction, has 
 it as really as a son has the counsel and direction of his father ; 
 and, though the voice be not audible or discernible by sense, yet 
 it is equally as real as if a man heard a voice saying, This is the 
 way, walk ye in it." " There is a principle of reflection in 
 men," says Bishop Butler, "by which they distinguish between, 
 approve and disapprove, their own actions. We are plainly con- 
 stituted such sort of creatures as to reflect upon our own nature. 
 The mind can take a view of what passes within itself, its pro- 
 pensions, aversions, passions, affections, as respecting such ob- 
 jects and in such degrees ; and of the several actions consequent 
 thereupon. In this survey, it approves of one and disapproves 
 of another, and towards a third is affected in neither of these 
 ways, but is quite indifferent. This principle in man, by which 
 he approves or disapproves his heart, temper, and actions, is 
 conscience ; for this is the strict sense of the word, though 
 sometimes it is used so as to take in more. And that this faculty 
 
 * Paradise Lost, III. 194. 
 
22 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 tends to restrain men from doing mischief to each other, and leads 
 them to do good, is too manifest to need being insisted upon." * 
 
 Finally, Dr. Paley, where not pledged to a particular system, 
 writes thus ; " Conscience, our own conscience, is to be our 
 guide in all things. It is through the whisperings of conscience, 
 that the Spirit speaks. If men are wilfully deaf to their con- 
 sciences, they cannot hear the Spirit. If hearing, if being com- 
 pelled to hear, the remonstrances of conscience, they neverthe- 
 less decide, and resolve, and determine to go against them, then 
 they grieve, then they defy, then they do despite to the Spirit of 
 God. Is this superstition ? Is it not, on the contrary, a just 
 and reasonable piety, to implore of God the guidance of his 
 Holy Spirit when we have any thing of great importance to de- 
 cide upon or undertake. It being confessed that we cannot 
 ordinarily distinguish, at the time, the suggestions of the Spirit 
 from the operations of our minds, it may be asked, How are we 
 to listen to them ? The answer is, by attending universally to 
 the admonitions within us." f The number of testimonies which 
 I have introduced is considerable, because, being in a great 
 measure a case of personal experience, it is well to subjoin au- 
 thority to argument. The testimonies are of the most respect- 
 able kind, and their number might have been easily enlarged. 
 They are derived from many ages and from several countries. 
 There is considerable variety of phraseology among the authors 
 quoted, as might be expected, but they all concur in recognising 
 a moral faculty in the mind, in affirming that this faculty possesses 
 wisdom to direct us aright, that its directions are given instanta- 
 neously as the individual needs them, and that it is invested with 
 unquestionable authority to command. J 
 
 6. The existence and office of conscience seems manifestly 
 to be recognised by Scripture. " When the Gentiles," says 
 
 * Quoted by Upham, Mental Philosophy, p. 525. 
 
 t Quoted by Dymond, Essays, p. 65. See Paley's third Sermon on the " In- 
 fluence of the Holy Spirit." There are various other passages in his Sermons, 
 in which he refers to conscience as the umpire in morals. In his Moral Phi- 
 losophy, in which he has discarded a moral sense or conscience, he was led 
 astray by the theory to which he had pledged himself. 
 
 X In making the above collection of authorities, the author has, to a consid- 
 erable extent, availed himself of the labors of Dymond. Essays, pp. 60-66. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 23 
 
 St. Paul, " which have not the law, do by nature the things 
 contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto 
 themselves ; which show the work of the law written in their 
 hearts, their conscience (ovvsldrjaig) also bearing witness, and 
 their thoughts the meanwhile accusing or else excusing one an- 
 other." * The latter part of this passage is translated by Dr. 
 Macknight thus ; " Their conscience bearing witness thereto, as 
 also their debates with one another ; in which they either accuse 
 one another of evil actions, or else defend each other when so 
 accused." And he comments on the passage thus ; " The re- 
 ality of a natural revelation " (by which he means the testimony 
 of conscience) "made to the heathen, the Apostle has proved 
 by three arguments. 1. By the pious and virtuous actions which 
 many of the heathens performed. 2. By the natural operation 
 of their conscience. 3. By their reasonings with one another, 
 in which they either accused or excused one another. For, in 
 their accusations and defences, they must have appealed to some 
 law or rule. Thus, in the compass of two verses, the Apostle 
 has explained what the light of nature is, and demonstrated that 
 there is such a light existing. It is a revelation from God, writ- 
 ten on the heart or mind of man ; consequently is a revelation 
 common to all nations."! 
 
 Again, St. Paul was accustomed "to live in all good con- 
 science before God " ; he " exercised himself to have always a 
 conscience void of offence toward God, and toward man." He 
 speaks of " his conscience bearing him witness in the Holy 
 Ghost," that is, under the guidance of the Holy Ghost ; his 
 rejoicing consisted in the testimony of his conscience, that in 
 simplicity and godly sincerity, he had had his conversation in 
 the world. By manifestation of the truth, he commended himself 
 to every man's conscience in the sight of God ; he makes the 
 end of the commandment to consist in charity out of a pure 
 heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned ; he 
 exhorted his Roman converts to be subject to civil government, 
 not only for wrath, but also for conscience' sake ; he enjoins 
 upon ministers of the gospel, to hold the mystery of the faith 
 
 * Romans, ii. 14, 15. t Note on Romans, ii. 15. 
 
24 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 in a pure conscience ; he was made manifest to God, and also 
 to the consciences of his Corinthian converts. St. Peter makes 
 the saving effects of baptism to depend, not on the putting away 
 of the filth of the flesh, but on the answer of a good conscience 
 toward God. 
 
 Besides, the sacred writers constantly speak of persons con- 
 victed by their own conscience ; — holding faith and a good 
 conscience ; — having their mind and conscience defiled ; — hav- 
 ing their hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience ; — and a con- 
 science seared with a hot iron, through long familiarity with sin.* 
 What meaning have terms and phrases like these, if we may, at 
 our will, strip conscience of its sanction, and regard it no longer 
 as a heaven-born rule of action ? The Scripture always speaks 
 of conscience, not as a term of convention, a mere creation 
 of the social system, but as an umpire planted in our breasts 
 by the hand of our Maker, to preside there and pass judg- 
 ment on our actions. A conscience combined to a certain 
 degree, with power of choice and liberty of action, not only 
 distinguishes us from the lower beings of creation, but constitutes 
 the very essence of our responsibility, both to God and man.f 
 
 The connexion renders appropriate three remarks, which also 
 naturally spring from the preceding discussion. 1. The con- 
 science, like other faculties of the mind, is capable of great 
 improvement by cultivation, and of great debasement by neglect, 
 and especially by habits of ignorance and vice. We find the 
 consciences of some men delicate, susceptible, and alive to the 
 slightest wrong. If they have been guilty of offences, or even 
 of serious indiscretions, they are overwhelmed with shame and 
 self-reproach. A sense of duty with them takes precedence 
 of all other considerations, and is the governing principle of their 
 conduct. A consciousness of duty disregarded is to them the 
 greatest of evils, and a conscience satisfied with the full and 
 honest discharge of duty, the greatest of blessings. In others, 
 " the still small voice " of conscience, the fruit of whose 
 
 * See Acts xiii. 1 ; xxiv. 16 ; Rom. ix. 1 ; 2 Cor. i. 12 ; iv. 2; 1 Tim. i. 5 j 
 Rom. xiii. 5 ; 1 Tim. iii. 9 ; 2 Cor. v. 11 ; 1 Pet. iii. 21 ; Tit. i. 15 ; John viii. 
 9; Heb. x. 2, 22; xiii. 18; 1 Tirn. i. 19; iv. 2. 
 
 t See Prof. Sedgwick, on the Studies of the University of Cambridge, p. 52. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 25 
 
 promptings is seen in the lives of the pure and the virtuous, 
 has long since ceased to be regarded ; stifled as it is, amid the 
 ragings and clamor of passion, and the practice of iniquity. Such 
 are said, in the strong language of Scripture, to have their con- 
 sciences seared with a hot iron. # They have become insen- 
 sible to all moral considerations and influences. They have 
 refused to listen to the sure guide given them by their Maker, 
 to guide them amidst the temptations, the seductions, and the 
 perplexities of life. Uninfluenced by moral principles, and re- 
 gardless of the sacred obligations of duty, they become the sport 
 of chance, of caprice, of humor, of impulse, of prejudice, of 
 passion, and of circumstance. We have, then, no talent in- 
 trusted to our care, the due cultivation and improvement of which 
 is so essential as this ; no talent, the neglect of which will be 
 so fatal to our usefulness and happiness. 
 
 2. We have seen the substantial uniformity and consistency 
 of sentiment, which have prevailed among men, both in ancient 
 and modern times, in regard to the practical department of 
 morals, f And we can now understand, why this coincidence 
 of sentiment has not been still more uniform and complete. 
 Like all other faculties of the mind, conscience sometimes fails 
 fully to perform its office. This is equally the case with mem- 
 ory and reason. The one does not bring every thing past to 
 our remembrance ; and the other sometimes leads us astray, both 
 in the affairs of life, and in matters of abstract science. As in 
 the case of reason, too, conscience is sometimes perverted. 
 Under the influence of strong prejudice and passion, every 
 object is discolored, the attention is completely absorbed, and 
 all the powers of the mind are disturbed. Under such circum- 
 stances, neither the conscience, the memory, nor the imagina- 
 tion, nor any other faculty, can perform the office assigned it. 
 But, when prejudice and passion have subsided, conscience 
 is relieved from its burthen, the power of moral discernment 
 returns, and the man reviews with dismay, remorse, and mor- 
 tification, the violence and perversion of feeling, to which, in 
 moments of excitement, he had permitted himself to give way. 
 
 * l Tim. iv. 2. t See above, pp. 6-10. 
 
 4 
 
26 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 Again, many actions are complex in their nature ; and this is 
 another source of aberration in our moral judgments of men 
 and actions. No one circumstance is of so much importance, 
 in determining the moral character of an action, as the intention 
 of the author. And how frequently is it, that we pronounce 
 on the moral conduct of a man, when we entirely, mistake his 
 motives and intentions, or are at least very imperfectly ac- 
 quainted with them. Moreover, our moral judgments of men 
 and their conduct will be much affected by early associations, 
 by differences of education, and especially by the light and posi- 
 tion from which we view them. In all these cases, mistaken 
 moral judgments must be ascribed to want of full and exact 
 knowledge, and not to any defects of conscience. Conscience 
 in moral transactions, as well as reason in other matters, must 
 have fair opportunities for its exercise, or it cannot be expected 
 to lead us in the right way. 
 
 3. We may now understand, how a man may follow the 
 dictates of his conscience, and still fall into iniquity, and incur 
 great guilt. We have seen, that the decisions of conscience 
 may be perverted by prejudice and passion, and by the influence 
 of early associations. We have seen, too, that actions are 
 sometimes complex in their nature, that is, they may be in 
 some respects worthy of approbation, and in others of repre- 
 hension, and this is another source of wrong moral decisions. 
 Hence, to decide rightly, we must be free from prejudice and 
 passion ; we must, as far as possible, divest ourselves of the 
 bias of early associations, and we must patiently analyze the 
 conduct and transactions upon which we presume to pass judg- 
 ment. 
 
 Moreover our consciences must be enlightened by knowl- 
 edge, and we must bring to their aid, full, calm, and honest 
 inquiry. Except in cases where ignorance is invincible, we 
 are required to have a conscience enlightened by knowledge 
 and reflection. St. Paul considered himself highly guilty in 
 persecuting the church of God, * although he verily thought 
 at the time of doing this, that he ought to do many things con- 
 
 * 1 Cor. xv. 9 ; Eph. iii. 8 ; 1 Tim. i. 13. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 27 
 
 trary to the name of Jesus of Nazareth ; * that is, he sincerely- 
 thought it his duty to oppose the gospel. The reason why he 
 considered himself guilty, in opposing the gospel and persecuting 
 the church, was, that he acted under the influence of unjust 
 prejudices and violent passions, which prevented him from 
 perceiving the evidence, and acknowledging the claim, of Chris- 
 tianity as a revelation from Heaven. Full evidence of the truth 
 of the gospel had been furnished ; but he had closed his eyes 
 to its light, and steeled his heart against all impressions in its 
 favor. " In the instance of St. Paul," says Dr. Macknight, 
 " we see how much guilt a man, who is not at pains to inform 
 himself, may, through ignorance, contract, without going con- 
 trary to his conscience. At this time Paul was doing things, 
 which, after he became an apostle, made him call himself the 
 chief of sinners ; he was touching the law blameless, and thought 
 that, in persecuting the Christians, he was doing God service."! 
 On the moral responsibility accompanying wilful ignorance, 
 and the guilt contracted by refusing or neglecting to enlighten 
 the conscience, Dr. Abercrombie says, "Deep guilt may attach 
 to the moral agent, who has been proof against the influence of 
 moral causes. There is guilt in ignorance, when knowledge was 
 within his reach ; there is guilt in heedless inattention, when 
 truths and motives of the highest interest claimed his serious 
 consideration ; there is guilt in that corruption of his moral 
 feelings which impedes the action of moral causes, because this 
 has originated, in a great measure, in a course of vicious desires 
 and vicious conduct, by which the mind, familiarized with vice, 
 has gradually lost sight of its malignity. During the whole of 
 this course, also, the man felt that he was a fi + ee agent ; that 
 he had power to pursue the course which he followed, and that 
 he had power to refrain from it. When a particular desire was 
 first present to his mind, he had the power immediately to act, 
 with a view to its accomplishment, or he had the power to 
 abstain from acting, and to direct his attention more fully to the 
 various considerations and motives, which were calculated to 
 guide his determination. In acting as he did, he not only with- 
 
 * Acts xxvi. 9, t Coram, on 1 Tim. i. 13. 
 
28 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 held his attention from those truths, which were thus calculated 
 to operate upon him as a moral being ; but he did still more 
 direct violence to an impulse within, which warned him, that he 
 was wandering from the path of rectitude. The state of moral 
 feeling which gradually results from this habitual violation of the 
 indications of conscience, and this habitual neglect of the serious 
 consideration of moral causes, every individual must feel to be 
 attended with moral guilt. The effect of it is, not only to pre- 
 vent the operation of moral causes on his future volitions, but 
 even to vitiate and distort the judgment itself, respecting the 
 great principles of moral rectitude. Without attempting any 
 explanation of this remarkable condition of the mental functions, 
 its actual existence must be received as a fact in the constitution 
 of human nature, which cannot be called in question ; and it 
 offers one of the most remarkable phenomena that can be pre- 
 sented to him, who turns his attention to the moral economy of 
 man." # Another writer well says, "Apart from human judg- 
 ments, there is an intrinsic moral difference in actions ; and hence 
 results the previous obligation of informing the mind, by a dili- 
 gent attention to the dictates of reason and religion, and of 
 delaying to act until we have sufficient light ; but, in entire con- 
 sistence with this, we affirm, that where there is no hesitation, 
 the criterion of immediate duty is the suggestion of conscience, 
 whatever guilt may have been previously incurred by the neg- 
 lect of serious and impartial inquiry."! 
 
 The conscience, therefore, of every individual is 
 
 to him the supreme and ultimate rule of duty; 
 
 but, to insure safe decisions, the mind must be kept 
 free from prejudice and passion, and, above all, the 
 conscience must be guided, regulated, and enlight- 
 ENED. In truth all the powers of the mind require cultivation for 
 their due exercise. The reason is necessary to confine the imag- 
 ination within sober limits ; the memory furnishes the reason with 
 the materials of which it is to make use ; and both the reason 
 and the conscience impose restraints on the appetites, the pas- 
 sions, and the will. All the other faculties have, in like manner, 
 
 * Inquiries concerning the Intellectual Powers, p. 169. 
 
 t Rev. Robert Hall's Works, Vol. I. p. 342. New York. 1832. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 29 
 
 important relations with the conscience, by the exercise and aid 
 of which, it may be so regulated and enlightened, and otherwise 
 cultivated, as to be qualified to perform its high office of deciding 
 on the moral feelings, sentiments, and conduct. I proceed to 
 review the chief sources by the aid of which the conscience 
 may be regulated and enlightened. 
 
 I. The Scriptures fully recognise civil government as binding 
 on the conscience ; * and, therefore, the enactments of the govern- 
 ment under which we live, or, in other terms, the law of the 
 land, 'is one of the rules by which the consciences of individuals 
 are to be regulated. 
 
 The law of a country is the combined reason, sentiment, and 
 wisdom of the citizens of such country, so far as relates to the 
 subjects embraced by the law, and therefore, aside from its 
 binding character as law, is entitled to the respect of the citi- 
 zens. f It is chiefly occupied in devising the means of protect- 
 ing the persons, liberties, reputation, and estates of the citizens ; 
 in settling the rules of evidence, and the forms of proceedings ; in 
 prescribing rules and ordinances in the numerous cases, in which 
 natural equity only ordains that there shall be a rule, but does 
 not prescribe what the rule shall be ; in adjusting private rights 
 in their endless and perplexing diversity, and in guarding against 
 fraud in all its devious ways. The practical administration of 
 the law consists, for the most part, in ascertaining the facts, 
 which enter into controversies, and on which their rightful de- 
 cision depends ; in inquiring into the extent of injury inflicted, 
 and the corresponding amount of damages which ought to be 
 rendered ; in settling the construction of statutes ; in applying the 
 law to various facts and unforeseen contingences, which daily 
 happen in the affairs of men ; and in looking beyond the present 
 case, to see, on the one hand, how the decision of to-day agrees 
 with preceding decisions, and, on the other hand, how it will 
 
 * Rom. xiii. 1-7; 1 Peter, ii. 13-16. 
 
 t Thuanus (De Thou) says, " The life, and soul, and judgment, and under- 
 standing of the country, centre in the laws. A state without law, like a body 
 deprived of its animating principle, is defunct and lifeless in its blood and 
 members. Magistrates and judges are but ministers and interpreters of the 
 laws, — and in fine, we are all servants of the laws, that we may be free." 
 — Prafatio Thuani ad Henricum TV. 
 
30 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES. 
 
 affect the rights and happiness of the community in years to 
 come. 
 
 Still, viewed as a guide, the law of the land is far from being 
 designed by the legislature itself to be full and complete. It 
 is imperfect in various respects ; the number of moral points, on 
 which the most voluminous body of laws touches, being com- 
 paratively very few. Writers on jurisprudence consider only 
 what the person, to whom the obligation is due, ought to think 
 himself entitled to exact by force ; what every impartial spectator 
 would approve of him for exacting, or what a judge or arbiter, 
 to whom he had submitted his case, and who had undertaken to 
 do him justice, ought to oblige the other person to suffer or to 
 perform. Moralists, on the other hand, do not so much examine 
 what it is that might properly be exacted by force, as what it is 
 that the person who owes the obligation ought to think himself 
 bound to perform, from the most sacred and scrupulous regard 
 to the general rules of justice, and from the most conscientious 
 dread, either of wronging his neighbour, or of violating the in- 
 tegrity of his own character. It is the end of jurisprudence to 
 prescribe rules for the decisions of judges and arbiters. It is 
 the end of morals to prescribe rules for the conduct of a good 
 man. By observing all the rules of jurisprudence, supposing 
 them ever so perfect, we should deserve nothing but to be free 
 from external punishment. By observing moral rules, sup- 
 posing them such as they ought to be, we should be entitled to 
 considerable praise, by the exact and scrupulous correctness of 
 our behaviour. It may frequently happen, that a good man 
 will think himself bound, from a sacred and conscientious regard 
 to the general rules of justice, to perform many things, which it 
 would be the highest injustice to extort from him, or for any 
 judge or arbiter to impose upon him by force. And the science 
 of morality is to be considered as furnishing direction to persons 
 who are conscious of their own thoughts, motives, and designs ; 
 rather than as a guide to the judge, or to any third person, whose 
 arbitration must proceed upon rules of evidence and maxims of 
 credibility with which the moralist has no concern. * 
 
 * See Paley's Moral and Political Philosophy, p. 361. — Smith's Theory of 
 Moral Sentiments, Vol. II. p. 119. 
 
AJND DISCUSSIONS. 31 
 
 " The object of a free civil government," says Chief Justice 
 Parsons, " is the promotion and security of the happiness of the 
 citizens. These effects cannot be produced, but by the knowl- 
 edge and practice of our moral duties, which comprehend all 
 the social and civil obligations of man to man, and of the citi- 
 zen to the state. If the civil magistrate in any state, could 
 procure, by his regulations, a uniform practice of these duties, 
 the government of that state would be perfect. To obtain that 
 perfection, it is not enough for the magistrate to define the rights 
 of the several citizens, as they are related to life, liberty, prop- 
 erty, and reputation, and to punish those by whom they may be 
 invaded. Wise laws, made to this end, and faithfully executed, 
 may leave the people strangers to many of the enjoyments of 
 civil and social life, without which their happiness will be ex- 
 tremely imperfect. Human laws cannot oblige to the perform- 
 ance of the duties of imperfect obligation ; as the duties of 
 charity and hospitality, benevolence and good neighbourhood ; 
 as the duties resulting from the relation of husband and wife, 
 parent and child ; of man to man, as children of a common 
 parent ; and of real patriotism, by influencing every citizen to 
 love his country, and to obey all its laws. These are moral 
 duties, flowing from the disposition of the heart, and not subject 
 to the control of human legislation. 
 
 " Neither can the laws prevent, by temporal punishment, secret 
 offences committed without witness, to gratify malice, revenge, 
 or any other passion, by assailing the most important and most 
 estimable rights of others. For human tribunals cannot proceed 
 against any crimes unless ascertained by evidence ; and they are 
 destitute of all power to prevent the commission of offences, 
 unless by the feeble examples exhibited in the punishment of 
 those who may be detected. Civil government, therefore, 
 availing itself only of its own powers, is extremely defective ; 
 and, unless it could derive assistance from some superior power, 
 whose laws extend to the temper and disposition of the human 
 heart, and before whom no offence is secret, wretched indeed 
 would be the state of man under a civil constitution of any form." * 
 
 * Massachusetts Reports, Vol. VI. p. 404. 
 
32 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 As a guide to the conscience, therefore, the law of the land is 
 imperfect, inasmuch as, 1. It omits many moral duties which 
 ought to be performed. 2. It gives permission to some things, 
 of which no good man ought to avail himself. 3. It some- 
 times enjoins obedience, when it has no way of enforcing such 
 obedience ; and, also, it has sometimes commanded what is 
 wrong, while it has prohibited what is right. Still, as the law 
 of the land is, in general, binding on the conscience, the citizen 
 is not justifiable in refusing compliance with its requisitions, 
 unless the grievance which it inflicts is severely burdensome, 
 and the wrong which it requires is palpable and unquestionable. 
 In all doubtful cases, the doubt should be given in favor of the 
 requirements of the law. 
 
 The law deserves our obedience, because it alone can re- 
 concile the jarring interests of all, secure each against the rash- 
 ness or malignity of others, and blend into one harmonious union 
 the discordant materials of which society is composed. The 
 law throws its broad shield over the rights and the interests of 
 the humblest and the proudest, the poorest and the wealthiest, in 
 the land. It fences around what every individual has already 
 gained, and it insures to him the enjoyment of whatever his 
 industry may acquire. It saves the merchant against ruinous 
 hazards, provides security for the wages of the mechanic and 
 the day-laborer, and enables the husbandman to reap his harvest 
 without fear of plunder. The sanctity of the marriage tie, the 
 purity of virgin modesty, the leisure of the student, the repose 
 of the aged, the enterprise of the active, the support of indi- 
 gence, and the decencies of divine worship, are all under its 
 guardian care. It makes every man's house his castle, and 
 keeps watch and ward over his life, his name, his family, 
 and his property. It travels with him by land and by sea ; 
 watches while he sleeps ; and arrays, in defence of him and his, 
 the physical strength of the entire state. Surely, then, it is 
 worthy of our reverence, our gratitude, and our affection. 
 Surely, obedience to its mandates is among the highest of our 
 duties.* 
 
 * See Address by William Gaston, before the College of New Jersey, 
 29th September. 1835. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 33 
 
 II. The consequences which may result from actions, is 
 another test by which their moral character may be judged. 
 Every man is bound by his duty to use forecast, and to look, 
 as far as possible, into the consequences of his conduct. This 
 test is subordinate and imperfect, and acts upon the conscience 
 chiefly through the reason ; still, in a large class of cases, it is 
 highly effectual and valuable. If we habitually inquire, what 
 would be the consequences to ourselves and to mankind, if every 
 one were to act as we are acting, or as we propose to act, 
 we shall not very often decide wrong in respect to our course of 
 conduct. It is our duty at all times to act with prudence, dis- 
 cretion, and after full reflection ; and there may, unquestionably, 
 be a degree of rashness, recklessness, and disregard of con- 
 sequences in our conduct, by which the conscience may be 
 scarcely less violated, than by a positive willingness, not to 
 say inclination, to do wrong. 
 
 This test supposes, that the welfare of ourselves and others 
 is the great design of our existence, and that virtue consists in 
 doing good to mankind. It makes usefulness and expediency 
 the measure and standard of rectitude. Some of the ancient 
 moralists used this standard, by which to determine the moral 
 nature of an action ; but they used it in a sense too unqualified, 
 and perverted its just meaning and application. They taught, 
 without just discrimination, that whatever was useful [utile) was 
 right. Cicero combats this principle, which seems to have 
 been very mischievously applied in his time, at great length and 
 with great earnestness, and maintains, that an action, to be worthy 
 of approbation, must unite the useful and the right. # He main- 
 tains, against the licentious writers of his time, that the useful- 
 ness of an action can never conflict with its rectitude, because 
 no action can ever be truly useful which is not also right, f 
 He makes the rectitude of an action the test of its usefulness, 
 and not the usefulness the test of its rectitude. Reduced to 
 practice, it is the question which continually presents itself to 
 every man, when he is tempted by the allurements of pleasure, 
 
 * "Utile atque honestum"; see his Offices, and particularly lib. iii. c. 3. 
 t " Quidquid honestum est, idem utile ; nee utile quidquam, quod non ho- 
 nestum.**— De Officiis, lib. iii. c. 4. 
 
 5 
 
34 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 of profit, or of fame, to do an act which he knows to be unjus- 
 tifiable and wrong ; and Cicero says, his habitual decision, on 
 the one side or on the other, determines him to belong to the 
 class of good or bad, of honest or dishonest, of upright or wicked 
 men. 
 
 In applying this standard to practice, we must not satisfy our- 
 selves with looking at the immediate and particular consequences 
 of our actions only ; to give it any considerable practical value, 
 we must also look to the remote and distant consequences of our 
 conduct. To satisfy this test, an action must be useful in the 
 long run, as well as near by; " in all its effects collateral and 
 remote, as well as in those which are immediate and direct ; " 
 since, in computing consequences, it makes no difference in 
 what way, or at what distance, they arrive. 
 
 It has before been observed, that Dr. Paley made the use- 
 fulness or expediency of an action the standard of its rectitude. 
 He says, "It is the utility of any moral rule alone, which con- 
 stitutes the obligation of it."* And, however mistaken he may 
 have been, in making "expediency" the corner-stone of his 
 system, still, the very circumstance of his doing this, led him to 
 state, illustrate, and qualify it with peculiar care. I should do 
 wrong, therefore, if I were not to avail myself freely of his 
 illustrations. 
 
 The bad consequences of actions, he says, are twofold, par- 
 ticular and general. The particular bad consequence of an 
 action is the mischief, which that single action directly and 
 immediately occasions. The general bad consequence is the 
 violation of some necessary or useful general rule. In many 
 cases, the particular consequences are comparatively insignifi- 
 cant, while the general consequences are so injurious as to call 
 for the greatest severity of punishment. 
 
 The particular consequence of counterfeiting the current coin 
 of a country, is the loss of a dollar, or of a few dollars, to the 
 person, or persons, who may receive it ; the general conse- 
 quence, that is, the consequence which would ensue if the same 
 practice were generally permitted, would be to abolish the use 
 
 * Moral and Political Philosophy, p. 42. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 35 
 
 of money. The particular consequence of forgery may be a 
 damage of fifty, or a hundred dollars, to the man who accepts 
 the forged bill ; the general consequence would be the destruc- 
 tion of paper currency. The particular consequence of horse- 
 stealing is a loss to the owner of the value of the horse stolen ; 
 the general consequence would be, that no man's horses would 
 be safe. The particular consequence of breaking into a house 
 without inhabitants may be the loss of some clothing, or of a 
 few spoons ; the general consequence would be, that no one 
 could safely leave his house unoccupied. The particular con- 
 sequence of smuggling may be a diminution of the national 
 income, almost too minute for estimation ; the general conse- 
 quence would be, the destruction of one entire branch of the 
 public revenue, a proportionate increase of the burthen upon 
 other branches, and the ruin of all fair and open trade in the 
 kind of merchandise smuggled. The particular consequence 
 of an officer's breaking his parole may be the loss of a prisoner, 
 who may, perhaps, not have been worth detaining ; the general 
 consequence would be, that this mitigation of captivity must be 
 refused to all other prisoners. The particular consequence of 
 assassination, or suicide, may be the death of an individual, 
 whose life may be of little or no importance to himself, or to 
 any one else ; the general consequence would be, that, in the 
 one case, every man would be under constant apprehensions for 
 his life, and that, in both cases, no man's life, however valuable, 
 would be safe. In all cases, the particular consequence is of 
 so small importance, compared with the general consequence, 
 that, in the enactment and administration of criminal laws, the 
 particular consequence is entirely disregarded and left out of 
 sight. The crime and the fate of the forger is the same, 
 whether he has forged to the value of five or fifty dollars. 
 The crime is regarded the same, as the general consequences 
 are the same. # 
 
 It has before been said, that the rule of expediency, by which 
 to estimate and guide our moral conduct, however valuable, is 
 still imperfect. 1. It is imperfect, because sometimes men with 
 
 * Moral and Political Philosophy, Book II. chap. 8. 
 
36 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 the best intentions, and after using the greatest care and diligence 
 to inform themselves, moreover after the most mature reflec- 
 tion, are unable to foresee and calculate the consequences of 
 their actions. Unforeseen contingencies sometimes occur in 
 human affairs, which baffle human sagacity and foresight. How- 
 ever anxiously we look into consequences, they often elude 
 our penetration. Hard, indeed, would be our condition, if, 
 without regarding our intention and the accompanying circum- 
 stances, our actions were to be ultimately and finally estimated 
 by their consequences. 
 
 2. Again, by directing our attention too exclusively to a 
 moral estimate of our external actions, we are in danger of 
 losing sight too much, of that restraint, which it is indispensable 
 to impose on the thoughts and inclinations ; in other terms, 
 of neglecting the moral culture of the heart, out of which are 
 the issues of life, and which is to be kept with all diligence. # 
 The rule of expediency is a rule of calculation ; valuable as 
 it is, it refers chiefly to our external conduct, and ought never 
 to be permitted to withdraw our attention from the suggestions 
 of an enlightened and unsophisticated conscience. It may be 
 useful in aiding the conscience, but must not be allowed to 
 supersede its high functions. 
 
 I subjoin two practical applications of this principle, by way 
 of illustration. 1. Every one is morally responsible for the 
 consequences of his actions, so far as he foresaw them, or might 
 have foreseen them by diligence and care. 
 
 2. We are prepared to understand and to explain several 
 current maxims, which are in the mouths of many persons, but 
 not always with a just understanding of their import. "We 
 must not do evil that good may come," that is, we must not 
 violate a general principle, for the sake of any particular and 
 immediate good consequence, which may result from such vio- 
 lation. The converse of this maxim, couched in very different 
 terms, is often cited thus, u The end sanctifies the means ;" a 
 dangerous maxim, and the more so, because men of worth and 
 of the best intentions, having good objects to accomplish, have 
 
 * Prov. iv. 23; Mat. xv. 18-20. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 37 
 
 sometimes acted upon it. They seem to have made this mistake 
 by looking so intently at their good object, that they did not 
 scrutinize the means, by which they proposed to attain it. In 
 truth, there is always an inclination to view the means in the 
 favorable light which the end reflects upon them. We know 
 how apt persons are to consider the cause good which they 
 wish to see advanced ; and, on the strength of this maxim, they 
 are tempted to be unscrupulous in using any means which they 
 deem likely to promote it. A good object should be accom- 
 plished by good means only. A bad cause may be consistently 
 advanced by bad means. Moreover, we sometimes hear this 
 maxim ; u We must do our duty without shrinking, and leave 
 the consequences to God." But we have seen, that one test, by 
 which we are to judge of our duty, is the consequences which 
 may probably result from our conduct. If we foresee, that the 
 consequences of a particular line of conduct will probably be evil, 
 or that the evil will probably preponderate over the good, we 
 ought to abstain from such line of conduct. This maxim is often 
 used by the inexperienced, the rash, the passionate, the enthu- 
 siastic, and the fanatical, to justify their conduct. 
 
 III. The preceding sources by which conscience is enlight- 
 ened and guided, to wit, the law of the land, and a regard to 
 the consequences of our conduct, are subordinate ; and the su- 
 preme authority, which supplies their deficiencies, is the sacred 
 Scriptures. These contain a system of moral truth, comprised 
 in facts, customs, precepts, and principles, adapted to all ages, 
 nations, climates, and circumstances of life. 
 
 This position is an important one, and, moreover, is not so 
 obvious as not to require a careful illustration. The Scriptures, 
 in reference to the periods of time which they embrace, are 
 usually considered by divines under three dispensations ; the 
 Patriarchal, the Mosaic, and the Christian. It will be conven- 
 ient to review the various writings of which the Scriptures con- 
 sist, under these same divisions ; by which we shall see, that 
 this moral system was gradually unfolded, according as these 
 dispensations succeeded each other in the order of time, and 
 according to the degree of knowledge mankind possessed, the 
 
38 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 kind of life they led, and various other circumstances which 
 affected their condition. 
 
 1. The book of Genesis comprises nearly all the Patriarchal 
 writings. It is more valuable for the moral facts (that is, facts 
 having a moral bearing and influence,) and institutions which it 
 makes known, than for the principles of a moral kind which it 
 contains, though it is not destitute of the latter. It makes known 
 the creation of the earth, the heavens, and all things else, from 
 nothing, in opposition to the ancient philosophers, some of whom 
 maintained that the universe had existed for ever, while others 
 ascribed its origin to blind chance. It also makes known, that 
 the universe was created by one God, in opposition to Poly- 
 theism ; and these two facts united, along with the duty of wor- 
 shipping one God, lay a foundation for a belief in the moral doc- 
 trine of a Divine Providence. 
 
 The creation of man in the divine image, by which the dig- 
 nity and excellence of his nature are recognised, and by this 
 recognition, the duty of acting up to the dignity of his na- 
 ture, — the origin of all the branches of the human family, 
 however diversified by complexion, features, habits, and degrees 
 of improvement, from a single pair, thus creating between them 
 all, the ties and obligations of kindred, and the interest and sym- 
 pathy in each other's welfare which spring from a common orig- 
 inal, — the institution of the Sabbath, and of marriage between 
 one man and one woman, — all have a silent, but most effectual 
 moral bearing and influence. 
 
 These facts and institutions prepare the way for the high esti- 
 mate set on human life by the Almighty, and for the command, 
 under the most severe penalties, against taking it away.* The 
 introduction, wide-spread increase, and overwhelming punishment 
 of sin by a universal deluge, viewed in connexion with the ac- 
 companying circumstances, imply a coextensive standard of mor- 
 als, not indeed reduced to writing, but that law of God written 
 in the hearts of men, which has in all ages and among all nations, 
 as we have seen,f caused substantially the same acts and habits 
 to be recognised as virtues or vices, merits or crimes. During 
 
 * Gen. iv. 5-14; ix. 5, 6. t See above, pp. 6 - 10. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 39 
 
 the remainder of the Patriarchal times after the deluge, when the 
 pastoral life chiefly prevailed, furnishing ease, leisure, and abund- 
 ance, crimes against the person do not seem to have been numer- 
 ous, and against property they were almost unknown. 
 
 2. It has been seen, that the morality of the Patriarchal dis- 
 pensation consisted in facts and institutions having a moral bear- 
 ing and influence, much more than in written precepts and posi- 
 tive principles. This was consistent with the circumstances of 
 the times, and the simple state of society which then prevailed. 
 But, as the institutions of Moses contemplated that the Hebrews 
 should dwell in settled residences, and pursue chiefly the agricul- 
 tural life, written rules of law and morals became desirable and 
 necessary. 
 
 Accordingly, as soon as their deliverance from the Egyptians 
 was fully accomplished, Moses, under divine guidance, began to 
 organize their civil and religious polity, by the enactment of va- 
 rious laws and ordinances, suited to their condition and pros- 
 pects. Among them the great moral laws, usually called " the 
 Ten Commandments," are the most remarkable. They were ever 
 after their promulgation the basis of the Jewish polity ; and, while 
 the other parts of the Mosaic ordinances have been superseded 
 by " the bringing in of a better hope," # they retain the freshness 
 of their divine original, and, surviving the polity of which they 
 were originally the corner-stone, they have been made the basis 
 of the morals of the new and more perfect dispensation. f 
 
 The first commandment requires us to acknowledge but one 
 God, the creator of the heavens and of the earth, and to make 
 him the object of our supreme love, reverence, and homage. 
 The second forbids idolatry, a most degrading sin, and, as his- 
 tory shows, the prolific parent of almost every other. The 
 claim of the Almighty to be acknowledged as the God of the 
 Hebrews was exclusive of the claim of every other being. The 
 Hebrews were very much addicted to idolatry, and in fact were 
 never effectually weaned from it, until they had tasted the bitter- 
 ness of a seventy years' captivity in Babylon. The third com- 
 mandment forbids profaneness, a sin which has not even the 
 
 * Heb. vii. 18, 19. See Schleusner in verb, l\-ri 5 . 
 
 t Mat. xxii. 35-40; xix. 16-20; Luke, x. 25-28; James, ii. 8-11. 
 
40 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 excuse of being committed under circumstances of temptation, 
 which is destructive of all reverence of God's holy name, and 
 which is equally a violation of manners, morals, and religion. 
 The fourth appoints a time for religious worship. All nations, 
 that have been blessed with the true religion, have concurred 
 in the duty of worshipping the true God ; and, so strong is the 
 conviction, that " there is a power above us," in the minds of 
 men, that they who have not enjoyed the true religion, have still 
 worshipped gods which their own imaginations have devised, and 
 which their own hands have fashioned. In the acknowledgment 
 of God, it is suitable that there should be an outward homage, 
 significant of our inward regard and reverence. If, then, it is 
 a duty to worship God, it is proper that some time be set apart 
 for that purpose, when all may worship him harmoniously and 
 without interrupting each other. One day in seven is surely no 
 more than a reasonable portion of time to be devoted to so high 
 a purpose. The fifth enjoins upon children that respect and 
 honor of their parents, which is due to them next after the hom- 
 age paid to Almighty God, and which, as St. Paul says, " is the 
 first commandment with promise." # 
 
 Injuries to our neighbour are then classified in the remaining 
 five commandments. They are divided into offences against 
 life, chastity, property, and character. It is worthy of notice, 
 also, that the greatest offence in each class is expressly for- 
 bidden. Thus, murder is the greatest injury to life ; adultery, to 
 chastity ; theft, to property ; and perjury, to character. Again, 
 the greater offence must include the less of the same kind. Mur- 
 der must include every injury to life ; adultery every offence 
 against chastity, and so of the rest.f Moreover, the moral code 
 is closed and perfected by a command forbidding even improper 
 desire in regard to our neighbour. The neglect of the duties 
 thus prescribed, and the committing of the offences forbidden, 
 
 * Ephesians, vi. 2. 
 
 t This view of the sixth, seventh, eighth, and ninth commandments is fully 
 sustained by our Saviour himself. See Mat. v. 21, 22, 27, 28, where every 
 thing tending to endanger life is pronounced to be a violation of the sixth ; 
 and every thing tending to excite or inflame lust, a violation of the seventh 
 commandment. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 41 
 
 are the frequent theme of prophetic warning, remonstrance, and 
 denunciation, throughout every part of the Mosaic dispensation. 
 
 But Hebrew morality is not yet exhausted, and is worthy of 
 still further illustration. The fifteenth Psalm contains a summary 
 of personal duty so excellent, that it has drawn forth the admi- 
 ration of some, who have not admired many other parts of the 
 sacred writings. The Book of Proverbs is an extremely valu- 
 able collection of moral and prudential maxims and sentiments, 
 the result of the enlarged experience of the wisest of men, and 
 applicable to every situation and exigency of human life. The 
 cautions against suretiship will be most commended by those 
 who have had most experience in human affairs. Nowhere do 
 we find stronger commendations of industry, frugality, chastity, 
 temperance, and integrity, or more serious warnings against idle- 
 ness, strife, envy, drunkenness, and rioting. Nowhere are the 
 ruinous courses of the wicked more impressively depicted, or 
 the inevitable consequences to which they lead, more graphically 
 delineated. Nowhere are pride, covetousness, selfishness, the 
 indulgence of rash anger, and the abuse of the tongue in the 
 manifold ways of falsehood, slander, secret calumny, false wit- 
 ness, and blasphemy, more forcibly reproved. Nowhere are 
 the wiles, the cunning, and the hardened front of the woman, 
 "who forsaketh the guide of her youth and forgetteth the cov- 
 enant of her God," and " whose house is the way to hell, go- 
 ing down to the chambers of death," more vividly described. 
 All authors, ancient and modern, cannot furnish such a picture 
 of the virtuous woman.* Every duty in life is enjoined and 
 skilfully commended to our notice, and not only every vice, 
 but every species of folly and even indiscretion, is guarded 
 against. 
 
 But it is in his concern for the young, and in his commenda- 
 tion of wisdom, that the wisest of men has put forth all the 
 strength of his persuasive wisdom and eloquence. u Happy is 
 the man that findeth wisdom, and the man that getteth under- 
 standing. For the merchandise of it is better than the merchan- 
 dise of silver, and the gain thereof than fine gold. She is more 
 
 * Prov. xxxi. 10-31. 
 
42 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 precious than rubies ; and all the things thou canst desire, are 
 not to be compared unto her. Length of days is in her right 
 hand ; and in her left hand riches and honor. Her ways are ways 
 of pleasantness and all her paths are peace. She is a tree of 
 life to them that lay hold upon her ; and happy is every one 
 that retainelh her. The Lord by wisdom hath founded the 
 earth ; by understanding hath he established the heavens."* 
 
 Moreover, the books usually termed Apocryphal in reference 
 to their origin, must not be entirely omitted, even in a very brief 
 review of the moral writings of the Hebrews. They are partly 
 historical and partly moral, and may well be read, as St. Jerome 
 says, " for example of life and instruction of manners." They are 
 written in the peculiar style of the Hebrew Scriptures, and mani- 
 festly by men of distinguished piety. It will not be necessary to 
 advert to any but the moral part of these writings. a The Wis- 
 dom of Solomon " consists of two parts ; the first, which is writ- 
 ten in the name of Solomon, contains a description or encomium 
 of Wisdom ; by which comprehensive term the ancient Hebrews 
 understood prudence and foresight, knowledge and understand- 
 ing, and chiefly a high sense of religion and of moral obligation. 
 Of virtue the author says, " The memorial thereof is immortal ; 
 because it is known with God and with man. When it is pres- 
 ent, men take example at it ; and when it is gone, they desire 
 it ; it weareth a crown, and triumpheth for ever, having gotten 
 the victory, striving for undefiled rewards."! Of old age he 
 says, " Honorable age is not that which standeth in length of 
 time, nor that is measured by number of years ; but wisdom is 
 the gray hair unto men, and an unspotted life is old age. "J 
 The other part contains a variety of subjects, reflections on the 
 history and conduct of the Hebrews, &c. The ancients ad- 
 mired this book for its elegance, and for its admirable moral 
 precepts, and some of them styled it " the treasury of virtue." 
 " The Wisdom of Jesus the Son of Sirach, or Ecclesiasti- 
 cus," opens with an exhortation to the pursuit of wisdom. To 
 this succeeds a collection of moral sentences or maxims, ar- 
 ranged very much after the manner of the Proverbs of Solomon, 
 
 * Prov. Hi. 13-19. t Wisdom of Solomon, iv. 1,2. t Ch. iv. 8, 9. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 43 
 
 and continuing to the end of the forty-third chapter. Here the 
 author commences a eulogy of the patriarchs, prophets, and 
 other celebrated men among the Hebrews, which is continued 
 through the fiftieth chapter. The book concludes with a prayer. 
 Except the inspired writings, a collection of purer moral pre- 
 cepts does not exist. 
 
 The unrivalled description of the power and majesty of Truth, 
 contained in 1 Esdras, iv. 34, &c, has been universally admired. 
 " Great is the earth, high is the heaven, swift is the sun in his 
 course, for he compasseth the heavens round about, and fetcheth 
 his course again to his own place in one day. Is he not great 
 that maketh these things ? Therefore, great is the truth, and 
 stronger than all things. All the earth calleth upon the truth, 
 and the heaven blesseth it ; all works shake and tremble at it, 
 and with it is no unrighteous thing. Wine is wicked, the king 
 is wicked, women are wicked, all the children of men are wick- 
 ed, and such are all their wicked works ; and there is no truth 
 in them ; in their unrighteousness also they shall perish. As 
 for the truth, it endureth, and is always strong ; it liveth and con- 
 quereth for evermore. With her, there is no accepting of per- 
 sons or rewards ; but she doeth the things that are just, and 
 refraineth from all unjust and wicked things ; and all men do 
 well like of her works. Neither in her judgment is any un- 
 righteousness ; and she is the strength, kingdom, power, and 
 majesty of all ages." 
 
 3. As the Gospel of Christ is, in all respects, more perfect 
 than the Mosaic dispensation, # u for the law made nothing per- 
 fect, but the bringing in of a better hope did," f it may be ex- 
 pected that its morals will partake of this superior perfection. 
 This higher morality consists not merely, nor perhaps princi- 
 pally, in the particular precepts dispersed through the writings of 
 the New Testament, but much more in the spirit which pervades 
 these writings, in the universality of the design of the Gospel, in 
 the moral sanctions which this Gospel establishes, in the moral 
 qualities, habits, and sentiments displayed in the lives, conver- 
 sation, and instruction of its inspired teachers and primitive 
 
 * Heb. i. 1-3 j iii. 1-6. t Heb. vii. 19. 
 
44 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 disciples ; and, above all, in the divine character of the Saviour 
 himself. It may be useful to give a very rapid sketch of the qual- 
 ities and characteristics of the morals of the Gospel, before pro- 
 ceeding to expand, illustrate, and apply the system in its details. 
 
 (1 .) The Mosaic dispensation was a shadow of good things 
 to come, and not the very image of the things ; * but life and 
 immortality are, in a preeminent sense, brought to light through 
 the Gospel. f The writings of the Old Testament were less 
 clear and definite in regard to a future life than might be wished ; 
 and one chief design of Christianity, as a revelation, was to in- 
 fluence the conduct of human life, by giving unquestionable proof 
 of a future state of rewards and punishments. The direct object, 
 therefore, of the design was to furnish motives to moral conduct 
 rather than rules ; sanctions rather than precepts. And man- 
 kind stood most in need of motives and sanctions. The works 
 of the Greek and Roman moralists show, that the members of 
 society can, in all ordinary cases, judge very well what their 
 duty is ; but, without a future state, or, what is the same thing, 
 without accredited evidence of such a state, they want a motive 
 to their duty ; at least they want strength of motive sufficient to 
 bear up against the force of passion and the temptation of imme- 
 diate interest. The rules of the ancient moralists were without 
 sanctions and authority. In conveying to the world, therefore, 
 unquestionable assurances of a future existence, Christianity 
 supplied precisely what was most needed by mankind, and ren- 
 dered the very service, which it might have been expected a pri- 
 ori would be, so far as morals were concerned, the chief end and 
 office of a revelation from God 4 
 
 (2.) Again; Christianity is the only religion, which has ever 
 contemplated extending itself and its blessings through the earth 
 by peaceable means ; which has made its duties and obligations 
 universally binding ; and which has imparted its encouragements, 
 its hopes, its prospects, its consolations, and its renovating and pu- 
 rifying power, to men of all conditions and circumstances of life.§ 
 
 * " Effigies solida et expressa." — Cicero, De Officiis, Lib. III. c. 17. See 
 also Heb. x. 1. 
 
 t 2 Tim. i. 10. t See Paley's Evidences of Christianity, p. 224. 
 
 § See Mat. viii. 11; X. 18; xiii. 38; xxviii. 19, 20; Mark, xvi. 15,16; 
 John, x. 16. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 45 
 
 Mahomet and his successors contemplated making his religion 
 universal ; but they relied for success on the power of the sword. 
 A brief historical review will convince us, that this characteristic 
 of the Gospel is much more extraordinary than we are accus- 
 tomed to suppose ; and that, before the time of Christ, it had 
 not entered into the mind of any one, that the extension of a 
 single religion throughout the earth was either possible or desir- 
 able ; much less, that it could become the duty of each indi- 
 vidual to contribute to this extension according to his ability, or 
 that it was the moral duty of each one to regard the whole hu- 
 man race as his brethren, and to consult their welfare and inter- 
 est as occasion might occur and opportunity be presented. The 
 Jewish religion was exclusive and even repulsive in its spirit, 
 and several of its provisions unfitted it to extend over more 
 than a small tract of country.* 
 
 Before the coming of Christ, as well as since, almost no age 
 has been destitute of individuals, who, looking beyond mere 
 kindred and self-interest, have been willing to contribute the fruit 
 of their labor and genius to the good of mankind. The number 
 of such men, with whom Providence has from time to time 
 blessed the earth, has been considerable, and they shed a lustre 
 over the ages to which they respectively belong. But as disin- 
 terested as was the aim of these individuals, as exalted as was 
 their purpose, and as expansive as their benevolence might be ; 
 they never reached more than a part, and usually a very small 
 part of mankind. No one, even in the utmost ardor of his zeal, 
 ever thought of embracing all men within the ample sphere of 
 his good-will, and still less entertained a serious design of ben- 
 efiting, either morally or physically, the entire human race. We 
 may understand, indeed, how far such a design was from being 
 entertained even by the best men, from the saying of Cicero, 
 himself, next to Socrates, the most perfect example of expansive 
 good-will up to his time ; to wit, that a man's country embraced 
 all the affections of every man.f This he says, not by way of 
 censure, but of approbation, and as the utmost stretch to which 
 the good-will of any man ought to expand itself. Probably even 
 
 * Exod. xxiii. 14, 17; Deut. xvi. 16. t De Officiis. Lib. I. c. 17. 
 
46 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 this distinguished man would have viewed a further extension of 
 good-will as overstepping the bounds of reason and patriotism. 
 The design, then, of benefiting morally and religiously the 
 whole human race, without regard to complexion, country, cli- 
 mate, or other circumstances, — a design which enters into the 
 very essence and heart of Christianity, — had occurred to no one 
 before the advent of the Saviour of mankind. But this is a 
 most important feature of Christianity, and will be seen still more 
 manifestly and impressively, if we inspect ancient history and 
 ancient writings somewhat more minutely. 
 
 His mind must be infected with incurable prejudice, who has 
 studied the writings of the ancient Greeks and Romans, without 
 kindling with admiration of the moral and intellectual qualities of 
 many of the patriots and statesmen whose names adorn the an- 
 nals of these celebrated nations. Their actions and writings, 
 and the traits of personal character which those writings make 
 known to us, contain much, very much, that is worthy of our 
 admiration ; and his taste and judgment are not to be envied, 
 who can hold them in light estimation. Still it is doing no in- 
 justice to these illustrious authors, patriots, and statesmen, to say, 
 that no one had attained the comprehensiveness of good-will, 
 which led him to entertain the design, or to devise a plan of 
 benefiting all men without discrimination. 
 
 The great fame of Hercules has been celebrated from the 
 earliest dawn of history to the present hour, yet he did no more 
 than wander over the earth ; by his great strength, ridding the 
 inhabitants, wherever he came, of the monsters which afflicted 
 them. This he did, moreover, impelled (it is said) by the anger 
 of Juno, and not from his spontaneous good-will. He is not said, 
 even by tradition, to have formed any plan for instructing, reform- 
 ing, or otherwise morally improving the human race, or any part 
 of it. The design of such men as Sesostris, Alexander, Pyrrhus, 
 and Caesar, was in no other sense universal, than as they wished 
 to devastate the earth universally, and subject all mankind to 
 military domination and despotic sway. 
 
 The early founders of cities, too, who, themselves rising above 
 the ignorance and barbarism of their times, had the skill and ad- 
 dress to assemble men in considerable numbers, and to put them 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 47 
 
 in the way of becoming civilized, by introducing agriculture, 
 commerce, manufactures, the arts, letters, and government among 
 them, are well entitled to much praise and admiration ; still their 
 enterprises, as meritorious as they were, admit of contrast rather 
 than comparison with the founding of that great commonwealth 
 of righteousness and peace, into which the author of Christianity 
 proposed to bring all men wherever scattered over the face of 
 the earth. We must form the same judgment of those men, 
 who by their personal valor and military skill defended their 
 country in ancient times. The history of the Greeks and Ro- 
 mans is full of examples of this kind ; Miltiades, Themistocles, 
 Leonidas, Agesilaus, Epaminondas, Philopcemen, Brutus, Fa- 
 bricius, Camillus, Marcellus, the Scipios, and many others. 
 Who does not know, and who can forget, their splendid achieve- 
 ments, their elevation of mind, and their intense love of country ? 
 But in illustrating the point before us, it cannot be necessary to 
 do more than refer to men of this class. Amidst all their great- 
 ness, they never looked beyond the interests of their own country. 
 Instead of wishing to benefit all mankind, or as many as possi- 
 ble, the object of their achievements could only be accomplished 
 by the overthrow and destruction of all opposed to them. And, 
 moreover, the motive from which they acted was of a mixed 
 nature, composed quite as much of a desire of personal fame as 
 of the pure love of country. 
 
 Nor, if we turn to the ancient lawgivers, salutary and praise- 
 worthy as their labors were, shall we find any one who had 
 formed a plan of extending the benefit of his labors to all 
 mankind. Their laws are filled with no doubtful or indistinct 
 traces of narrow and selfish views, and not unfrequently manifest 
 a jealous and hostile spirit towards all other nations. To the 
 class of lawgivers belong the Seven Wise Men of Greece, so 
 called by reason of the wisdom supposed to be manifested in the 
 laws and maxims which they wrote and promulgated. It was 
 the pervading policy of all the ancient States, and especially 
 those of Lacedaemon and Rome, to make the citizens warriors, 
 and to encourage and inspire them with the spirit of conquest 
 and the lust of domination. Even in time of peace, one nation 
 did not look upon another with a friendly eye. The Roman law 
 
48 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 lays it down as a settled principle, with respect to nations with 
 whom the Romans were at peace, but had no particular alliance, 
 that whoever passed from one country to the other, immediately 
 became a slave.* The views of them all were comparatively 
 exclusive, contracted, and selfish. 
 
 If, moreover, we resort to the ancient philosophers, who flour- 
 ished before the coming of Christ, and make ourselves ac- 
 quainted with their lives and writings, we shall still be unsuc- 
 cessful in finding any one who raised his mind above his imme- 
 diate sphere, or whose good-will was much more expansive 
 than that which we have ascribed to the ancient lawgivers and 
 founders of cities. Some of them admit, indeed, that there 
 is a certain degree of relationship (societas) among all mankind, 
 the bond of which consists in reason and speech ; and that men 
 are not born for themselves alone, but that they may be useful 
 to each other ; f but we search the writings of the ancient phil- 
 osophers in vain for any plan of benevolence embracing all 
 mankind, and for any trace of that fraternal love, by which the 
 Saviour sought to unite all the families of the earth in unity of 
 faith, and in the bonds of righteousness and peace. 
 
 If we regard practical wisdom, good-will to man, ardor and 
 zeal in instructing and benefiting as many as possible, Socrates 
 is confessedly the chief of the ancient philosophers. What 
 scholar can peruse his defence of himself and his instructions, 
 as given by his celebrated disciple Plato,J without being strong- 
 ly affected, and moved with admiration of that greatness of 
 mind, which, in prosecuting his salutary and disinterested de- 
 sign, led him to disregard and despise all the objects usually 
 esteemed most valuable among men. He declares in presence 
 of his judges, that he will not be deterred, by the fear of any 
 punishment which they can inflict, from maintaining his accus- 
 tomed intercourse with his fellow-citizens, in which his habit 
 had been to avail himself of every opportunity to exhort them to 
 the practice of honor and virtue. He professes, that he will 
 not yield obedience to their decrees, if they attempt to prevent 
 him from instructing his countrymen in the way of truth and 
 
 * Digests, 49. 15. 5. 2. 
 
 t Cicero, De Legibus, Lib. I., and De Ofliciis, Lib. I. i Apologia Socr. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 49 
 
 duty ; and adds the celebrated resolution, " I will obey the Di- 
 vinity rather than you." # He declares, that he has been given to 
 his country by the special favor of the Divinity, and says, that, 
 mindful of his high commission, he has, during many years, to 
 the total neglect of his private interest, devoted himself to the 
 welfare of his countrymen, and, addressing the citizens individu- 
 ally as opportunity offered, with all the interest and affection of a 
 father or an elder brother, has exhorted them to the love and 
 practice of virtue. 
 
 But, noble and disinterested as were the views of this great- 
 est of all the ancient philosophers, what comparison can be in- 
 stituted between him and the Author of Christianity, in regard 
 to their respective designs, and the spirit manifested in them ? 
 Socrates labors to instruct and reform the Athenians ; Jesus 
 designs to instruct and renovate the human race, spread over the 
 face of the earth ; and not only so, but his design embraces the 
 renovation and salvation of all the future generations of mankind. 
 Socrates, although he sees how vain and impious the sentiments 
 of his countrymen are, concerning the nature of the Divinity, not 
 only does not dare to overthrow the idolatry of Athens, but 
 thinks that some allowance should be made for their prejudices, 
 and even participates in their superstition. The Gospel of 
 Jesus, on the other hand, was designed (and much of this design 
 has been accomplished) to overthrow and exterminate all false 
 divinities throughout the earth, and to bring all men to unite in the 
 worship of the supreme and true God. Socrates is not deterred 
 from his design by the menaces of his ungrateful countrymen, 
 and at length perishes by a mild and honorable kind of death. 
 The design unfolded in the Gospel of Jesus excites against him, 
 both the utmost virulence of the Jews, and the scorn and con- 
 tempt of the Gentiles ; and at length he dies the death of the 
 cross, a punishment, of all the most painful and ignominious. 
 Finally, although we may rightfully view Socrates as the first of 
 all the philosophers of antiquity, still, when we consider the plan 
 which he devised, the labors he performed, or the knowledge 
 he imparted, we must be convinced that he was far, very far, 
 
50 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 surpassed, even by the apostles of our Saviour ; and that, in re- 
 spect to the Saviour himself, when we regard the design, the 
 spirit, and the power of his Gospel, never man spake like 
 
 THIS MAN.* 
 
 (3.) Christianity is the only religion which has undertaken to 
 control and regulate the prime sources of human action, by put- 
 ting a moral restraint on the thoughts. The feelings and propen- 
 sities of mankind, which require to be specially curbed in their 
 ultimate sources, are of two kinds, — the malicious, and the 
 voluptuous passions. "From within," says our Saviour, "out 
 of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornica- 
 tions, murders, thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lascivi- 
 ousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness ; all these evil 
 things come from within, and defile the man."f He denounces 
 the Scribes and Pharisees in the most severe terms, because, 
 while they made clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, 
 they were within full of extortion and excess. He says, they 
 appeared outwardly righteous unto men, but within were full of 
 hypocrisy and iniquity. And he compares them to whited sepul- 
 chres, which appear outwardly beautiful, but within are full of 
 dead men's bones and of all uncleanness. J And, above all, the 
 searching and decisive declaration designed to curb the first risings 
 of unlawful desire ; — "Whosoever looketh on a woman to lust 
 after her, hath committed adultery with her already in his heart." § 
 
 No one can doubt, that the control and regulation of the pas- 
 sions and propensities of our nature is indispensable, and that the 
 placing the check on the thoughts, instead of the actions, is one 
 important point of difference between religion and law. While 
 Christianity manifests the utmost solicitude to regulate the affec- 
 tions, appetites, and desires, the law is contented with bringing 
 the actions of delinquents to its tribunal, and does not take notice 
 of their thoughts, or even their intentions, except so far as these 
 give a character to their actions. From the nature of the case, 
 the law must be satisfied with regulating the actions of men ; 
 but Christianity, addressing itself immediately to the conscience, 
 
 * John vii. 46. — See Reinhard's Opuscula Academica, Vol. I. p. 240, &c. 
 t xWark vii. 21-23. t Mat. xxiii. 25-28. § Mat. v. 28. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 51 
 
 has the power to penetrate the inmost recesses of the human 
 breast, and to curb the inmost thoughts. Christianity makes the 
 control of the thoughts essential. External appearance is no 
 recommendation, internal purity is every thing. And every 
 reflecting man must be convinced, that this is the only discipline 
 which can succeed. The law of the land is extremely defective, 
 as a moral system, because, among other reasons, while it pro- 
 hibits certain actions, it can impose no restraint on the thoughts. 
 Wise legislators, in all ages, have been sensible of this defi- 
 ciency in the reach of the law.* "Without restraint, all the pas- 
 sions soon become ungovernable, and their effects disastrous. 
 u Every moment of time," says Haller, " that is spent in medi- 
 tations upon sin, increases the power of the dangerous object 
 which has possessed our imagination."! This may suffice to 
 illustrate the great moral feature of Christianity, which goes up 
 to the sources of human conduct, and imposes a curb, where it 
 will be most effectual, on the thoughts, affections, passions, 
 appetites, desires, and intentions. 
 
 (4.) In Christianity, mere profession is unvalued and disregard- 
 ed, unless accompanied by practical morals and active virtue. 
 " Not every one (no one) that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall 
 enter into the kingdom of heaven ; but he that doeth the will of 
 my Father who is in heaven." J "I will have mercy and not 
 (rather than) sacrifice." § "Not the hearers of the law are just 
 before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified." [| u Be 
 ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own 
 selves. Whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and 
 continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of 
 the word, this man shall be blessed in his deed." Again, " Pure 
 religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, — to 
 visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep 
 himself unspotted from the world. "IF 
 
 Any profession of Christianity which does not produce good 
 works, as its natural fruit, is pronounced vain and hypocritical. 
 In this way, Christian morals are inseparably incorporated with 
 
 * See above, pp. 30 - 32. 
 
 t Quoted by Dr. Paley, Evidences of Christianity, p. 232. 
 
 t Mat. vii. 21. § Mat. ix. 13. II Rom. ii. 13. If James i. 22-27. 
 
52 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 a profession of the Christian religion. u Bring forth, therefore, 
 fruits meet for repentance." * Again, " Ye shall know them 
 by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of 
 thistles ? Even so, every good tree bringeth forth good fruit ; 
 but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. A good tree cannot 
 bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good 
 fruit. Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit, is hewn 
 down, and cast into the fire. Wherefore by their fruits ye shall 
 know them."f Again, comparing faith and works, St. James 
 says, u What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he 
 hath faith, and have not works ? Can faith save him ? If a 
 brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, and one 
 of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and 
 filled ; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are 
 needful to the body ; what doth it profit ? Even so faith, if it 
 hath not works, is dead, being alone. By works a man is justi- 
 fied, and not by faith only. For, as the body without the spirit 
 is dead, so faith without works is dead also." And the same 
 sacred writer declares, that mere belief in one God without a 
 corresponding moral effect, is no better than the belief of devils, 
 who, while they believe, tremble at the vengeance of the Most 
 High.+ 
 
 We have seen that mere profession, and even zeal, however 
 impassioned, without corresponding practical virtue, will not be 
 acceptable ; and it may be added, that neither are actions, done 
 from motives of ostentation and desire of fame, virtuous in the 
 eye of Christianity. Still it is the selfish desire of fame, to be 
 used for purposes of self-gratification only, or chiefly, and not to 
 be turned to the benefit of mankind, on which Christianity 
 frowns. We may aim, and ought to aim, to acquire reputation, 
 which we propose to ourselves to use rightfully and beneficially. 
 " Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of 
 them, otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in 
 heaven. When thou prayest, enter into thy closet ; and, when 
 thou hast shut the door, pray to thy Father which is in secret ; 
 and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly." § 
 
 * Mat. iii. 8. t Mat. vii 16-20. J James ii. 14-26. § Mat. vi 1 -6. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 53 
 
 What is here said of prayer and almsgiving, must, by parity 
 of reasoning, be applied to all other duties and virtues. " This 
 exclusion of regard to human opinion," says Dr. Paley, u is a 
 difference, not so much in the duties to which the teachers of 
 virtue would persuade mankind, as in the manner and topics of 
 persuasion. And in this view the difference is great. When 
 we set about to give advice, our lectures are full of the advan- 
 tages of character, of the regard that is due to appearances, and 
 to opinion ; of what the world, especially of what the good or 
 great, will think or say ; of the value of public esteem, and of the 
 qualities by which men acquire it. Widely different from this 
 was our Saviour's instruction ; and the difference was founded 
 upon the best reasons. For, however the care of reputation, 
 the authority of public opinion, or even of the opinion of good 
 men, the satisfaction of being well received and well thought of, 
 the benefit of being known and distinguished, are topics to which 
 we are fain to have recourse in our exhortations ; the true virtue 
 is that which discards these considerations absolutely, and which 
 retires from them all, to the single internal purpose of pleasing 
 God. This, at least, was the virtue which our Saviour taught. 
 And in teaching this, he not only confined the views of his fol- 
 lowers to the proper measure and principle of human duty, but 
 acted in consistency with his office as a monitor from Heaven." * 
 
 Furthermore, with Christianity, the mild, gentle, and peaceful 
 virtues take precedence of all others. u As we have many 
 members in one body, and all members have not the same 
 office ; so we, being many, are one body in Christ, and every 
 one members one of another." That is, Christians, in respect 
 to harmony, are to resemble the limbs of the human body in 
 their intimate union. u Let love be without dissimulation. 
 Be kindly affectioned one to another with brotherly love ; in 
 honor preferring one another ; patient in tribulation, continuing 
 instant in prayer ; distributing to the necessity of saints ; given 
 to hospitality. Bless them which persecute you ; bless, and 
 curse not. Rejoice with them that do rejoice, and weep with 
 them that weep. Be of the same mind one toward another. 
 
 * Evidences of Christianity, p. 238. 
 
54 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 Mind not high things, but condescend to men of low estate. Be 
 not wise in your own conceits. Recompense to no man evil for 
 evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men. If it be 
 possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men. 
 Avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath : for it 
 is written, Vengeance is mine ; I will repay, saith the Lord. 
 If thine enemy hunger, feed him ; if he thirst, give him drink. 
 Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good." * 
 
 These passages all stand by the side of each other ; the New 
 Testament is full of such ; it is superfluous to quote more. 
 Even among the mild virtues, which, as a class, take precedence 
 of all others, the preference is given to charity, or a good-will 
 so diffusive as to embrace all mankind. This crowning virtue 
 of Christianity, moreover, is preferred before that hope which 
 maketh not ashamed, which is a helmet of salvation, and an 
 anchor of the soul both sure and steadfast ;f and before that faith, 
 which is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of 
 things not seen, and without which it is impossible to please 
 God. " And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three, but 
 the greatest of these is charity." J St. Paul says, " If there be 
 any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, 
 Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself." And again, " For 
 all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this, Thou shalt love 
 thy neighbour as thyself." § St. John says, u This command- 
 ment have we from him, That he who loveth God, love his 
 brother also." || St. James calls the same commandment, u the 
 royal law. "IT 
 
 (5.) The peculiar doctrines of Christianity were, at its first 
 promulgation, absolutely new to the world, and the character of 
 the Christian is to be formed under the united influence of its 
 doctrines and its morals. And, if it cannot be said of its morals 
 as of its doctrines, that there was any thing absolutely new in 
 them, still it can be said, with the most perfect truth, that Chris- 
 tianity has improved and corrected our views of all the virtues 
 and duties of life, by infusing its peculiar spirit into them. This 
 
 * Rom. xii. 4-21. t Rom. v. 5; 1 Thess. v. 8 ; Heb. vi. 19. 
 
 t Heb. xi. 1-6; 1 Cor. xiii. 13. § Rom. xiii. 9; Gal. v. 14. 
 
 I 1 John iv. 21. 1T James ii. 8. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 55 
 
 is the case with some much more than with others ; — patriotism, 
 friendship, and humility, may serve for illustration. It was im- 
 possible that a religion so benign as the Christian, destined to be 
 universal, and being itself the ultimate standard of morals, should 
 be without an influence on the entire department of morals, — if 
 not direct, still both real and beneficial. 
 
 Patriotism, as understood in Greece and Rome, and too often 
 also in later times, justified outrageous wrong towards every other 
 nation, * provided the patriot could, by such wrong, advance 
 the supposed interests of his own country. Christian patriotism, 
 while it permits and requires a just preference of our own coun- 
 try, still enjoins good- will to all other nations. Again, many of 
 the sentiments of the ancient writers respecting friendship are just 
 and proper in themselves, and cannot be perused without admira- 
 tion. They comprise tenderness, amiableness, faithfulness, and 
 a willingness to make sacrifices for the sake of a friend ; but, at 
 the same time, they permit and encourage a spirit of exclu- 
 sion and indifference to the welfare of all who are out of the 
 pale of a man's friendship, that has been softened by the universal 
 benevolence, which is the corner-stone of Christian morals. So 
 again, humility (humilitas), which among the Romans signified 
 meanness, abjectness, in its Christian meaning signifies a low 
 estimation of ourselves and our deserts in the sight of God, but 
 is not inconsistent with all suitable manliness and independence of 
 spirit and conduct in the sight of men. Finally, Christianity has 
 softened and rectified the spirit and temper, which we should 
 carry into all the situations and relations, which we sustain in life, 
 by enjoining on us the great law of love ; to wit, " All things 
 whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so 
 to them." f 
 
 But the character of our Saviour, as well as the doctrines and 
 moral precepts taught by him, is a part of the morality of the 
 
 * The Roman history, however, contains instances to the contrary. — See 
 Cicero, De Officiis, Lib. III. c. 11,22. " Non fraude, neque occultis, sed palam 
 et armatum populum Romanum hostes suos ulcisci, " — " Not by fraud, not by 
 secret machinations, but openly and armed, the Roman people avenges itself 
 on its enemies; " was the answer of the Senate of Rome to the proposition of 
 the king of the Catti, to take off Arminius by poison. 
 
 \ Mat. vii. 12. 
 
- 56 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 gospel ; * without some delineation of which, this part of my 
 labors would be too imperfect and unsatisfactory. But how shall 
 I acquit myself on this part of the subject ? Not by attempting 
 to do it justice ; for this would be impossible. Who can, with 
 safety, attempt to portray the moral character of the Saviour of 
 mankind ? As never man spake , so never man acted, like this 
 man. f What may not be done fully , however, may be done 
 imperfectly ; and, if a vivid picture cannot be drawn, a faint one 
 at least may be furnished. The imperfections may well be 
 attributed to the writer. 
 
 The greatest of the Roman orators and moralists, and the 
 most eloquent and valuable writer of all antiquity, (Cicero,) has 
 left us a delineation of a great and good character, in the draw- 
 ing of which, he may well be presumed to have exhausted his 
 utmost skill. 
 
 The chief excellences combined in the character of the great 
 and good man delineated by him, are, a low estimate (con- 
 tempt) of riches, power, honor, and the other gifts of fortune, — 
 a willingness to undertake arduous labors, incur dangers, and even 
 expose life itself in a good cause, — independence of mind, — 
 the pursuit of nothing but what is honorable and praiseworthy, — 
 and that complete self-control, which raises a man above the 
 influence of all passion and agitation of mind, and puts it be- 
 yond the power of external circumstances to discompose or 
 otherwise disturb him.| And it must be admitted, that these 
 
 * Paley's Evidences of Christianity, p. 252. t John vii. 46. 
 
 t I subjoin the entire passage, of which the above is a summary. — " All true 
 greatness of mind," says he, "is especially seen in two things ; — the first is a 
 generous contempt or disregard of all the goods of fortune, proceeding from an 
 opinion, that it is unworthy of a man, to admire or wish for or endeavour after 
 anything, unless it be honorable and becoming; to submit himself to the will 
 of any one ; to be a slave to his own irregular passions ; or, in any way, to be 
 affected by the caprices of fortune. When he has acquired such a temper of 
 mind as I have been describing, — then the second thing is, that he perform 
 such actions as are glorious and beneficial, but withal very full of labors and 
 difficulties, and extremely hazardous to life itself, as well as to those things 
 which pertain to life, and on which the value of life very much depends. Now 
 all the lustre and dignity of these two things, nay, I add, all their usefulness 
 too, consists in the latter ; but the principle, as it were, and effective cause of 
 all true greatness, consists in the former. For, in that," continues he, " are con- 
 tained those noble aspirations, which exalt men's minds, and raise them above 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 57 
 
 are severe and searching tests by which to try greatness and ex- 
 cellence of character. But we may subject the character of the 
 Saviour of mankind to tests vastly, nay, infinitely more severe, 
 searching, and comprehensive, than those put forth by the 
 rich and cultivated imagination of this greatest master of all 
 antiquity, and it will not be found wanting. 
 
 1. We may reflect on the moral sublimity of the design op 
 his coming ; which was to bring life and immortality to light ;* 
 to overthrow the dominion of Satan, sin, and misery ; and to es- 
 tablish an empire of peace, knowledge, and righteousness, which 
 should embrace all the nations of the earth within its ample 
 bounds. 
 
 2. We may reflect on the nature of the means which 
 
 HE EMPLOYED TO ACCOMPLISH HIS SUBLIME AND BENEFICENT 
 
 design; which were, the exclusive devotion of himself to 
 every labor of benevolence ; to the working of miracles, which 
 were to be, in every country and in all succeeding time, the 
 standing and overwhelming proofs of the divinity of his mission ; 
 to the instruction of all men without discrimination of rank, as 
 occasion was given him, and of a select band of disciples in par- 
 ticular, to whom was to be intrusted a portion of his miraculous 
 power ; the instructing of all mankind in his religion, and the 
 organization of a society (the church) ,f designed to be a uni- 
 versal commonwealth of peace, intelligence, and holiness ; and, 
 to crown all, the voluntary sacrifice of himself on the cross, to 
 make an atonement by which the pardon of sin might be ren- 
 dered possible, and repentance might become effectual to salvation. 
 
 all earthly things. The first particular, too, is itself made up of two parts, — 
 
 1. An opinion, that nothing is truly and really good, but what is honorable, 
 
 2. Freedom from every kind and degree of passion or disturbance of mind. 
 For, what can more discover a man of a brave and heroic spirit, than to make 
 no account of those things which seem so glorious and dazzling to the gener- 
 ality of mankind, but entirely to disregard them ; not from any vain caprice and 
 humor, but from solid and firm principles of reason and judgment. Or what 
 can more show strength of mind and unshaken constancy, than to bear those 
 heavy and numerous calamities, which are incident to mankind in this life, 
 with such firmness and consistency of temper, and fixedness of soul, as never 
 to transgress against nature and right reason, or do any thing unworthy of the 
 dignity and character of a wise man." — De Orficiis, Lib. I. c. 20. 
 
 * 2 Tim. i. 10. t See Bishop Butler's Works, p. 159. London, 1828. 
 
 8 
 
58 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 3. Again, we may reflect on the personal qualities 
 displayed by the Saviour, in prosecuting a design thus 
 fraught with the choicest hopes and prospects of mankind ; his 
 patience and endurance, equally inexhaustible by labor, by suffer- 
 ing, and by provocation ; his uncompromising denunciations of 
 iniquity, in places however high, and under circumstances 
 however hazardous ; * his mildness and benevolence, as seen 
 in his kindness to children,! in his weeping upon the death 
 of his friend Lazarus J and over the approaching ruin of his 
 country, § in his notice of the widow's mite, (j in his para- 
 bles of the ungrateful servant, of the pharisee and publican, and 
 of the good Samaritan, and in his prayer for his enemies in the 
 midst of his sufferings, which seems then to have been new, 
 though it has since been frequently imitated ; his humility, as seen 
 in his commending moderate desires after the goods of fortune, IT 
 and in his constant reproof of contentions for superiority ; his 
 piety and devoutness of mind, as seen in his frequent retire- 
 ment for solitary prayer,** in his habitual giving of thanks, ff in 
 his reference of the laws and beauties of nature to a Divine 
 Providence, JJ in his earnest addresses to his Father, more par- 
 ticularly the brief but solemn prayer before calling Lazarus from 
 the tomb, in the profound piety of his behaviour in the garden 
 on the last evening of his life ; §§ his prudence, where prudence 
 is most wanted, that is, on trying occasions, and in giving an- 
 swers to artful and ensnaring questions. Particular and striking 
 instances of these are seen in his withdrawing, at various times, 
 from the first symptoms of tumult, |||) with the wish of pros- 
 ecuting his ministry in quietness ; in his declining every kind and 
 degree of interference with the civil affairs of the country ; in 
 his judicious answer to the ensnaring question respecting the 
 payment of tribute to Caesar ; UT in his solution of the difficulty 
 concerning the interfering relations of a future state, as proposed 
 
 * Matt. xi. 20 - 24 ; xxiii. 13 - 38, &c. t Mark x. 16. t John xi. 35. 
 
 § Luke xix. 41 - 44. || Mark xii. 42. 
 
 IT Luke xii. 15 - 34. ** Matt. xiv. 23 ; Luke ix. 28. 
 
 ft Matt. xi. 25 ; Mark viii. 6 ; John vi. 23 ; Luke xxii. 17. 
 
 tt Matt. vi. 26 - 28. § § John xi. 41 ; Matt. xxvi. 36-47. 
 
 HI] Matt xiv. 22; Luke v. 15, 16; John v. 13; vi. 15. HIT Matt. xxii. 19. 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 59 
 
 to him in the case of a woman who had married seven breth- 
 ren ; # and, more especially, in his reply to those who de- 
 manded from him an explanation of the authority by which he 
 acted, which reply consisted in proposing a question to them, 
 situated between the very difficulties into which they were insid- 
 iously endeavouring to draw him. f 
 
 4. Finally, we may reflect on the effects produced by 
 Christianity even thus far, as seen in its superseding the 
 Mosaic dispensation, which was but " the shadow of good things 
 to come " ; J in its gradual undermining, successful assault, and 
 final overthrow of the great system of Roman superstition, 
 u which," as Gibbon says, " was interwoven with every circum- 
 stance of business or pleasure, of public or private life, with 
 all the offices and amusements of society ; " § in the civilization, 
 public order, general cultivation and refinement, which it commu- 
 nicated to the barbarians who destroyed the Roman empire, and, 
 penetrating the forests and mountains from whence they issued, 
 brought at length these countries themselves within its civilizing, 
 enlightening, elevating, and purifying power ; in the increasing 
 knowledge, and advancement in art and science, in private and 
 public morals, in social and political institutions, which have always 
 accompanied its progress everywhere ; especially in its accom- 
 panying the origin and advances of European colonization on this 
 immense continent, in Africa, in the islands of the great Pacific 
 and Indian oceans, and in the vast dominions of British India ; 
 in its diminishing the frequency, softening the fierceness, and miti- 
 gating the calamities of war ; in its putting an end to the crime 
 of infanticide ; in its restoring the wife from a condition of hu- 
 miliation and servitude, to be the companion, the associate, the 
 confidential adviser and friend of her husband ; in providing a 
 home for the poor, the outcast, and the forsaken ; and in exter- 
 minating the combats of gladiators, the impurities of superstitious 
 rites, and unnatural vices not to be named and scarcely to be 
 referred to in the presence of a Christian assembly,|| and known 
 
 * Matt. xxii. 28. f Matt. xxi. 23, &c. See Paley's Evid. pp. 252-257. 
 
 t Col. ii. 17; Heb. viii. 5; x. 1. 
 
 § Quoted by Dr. Paley, Evidences, p. 19. 
 
 || Exod. xxii. 19 ; Levit. xviii. 23 ; Deut. xxvii. 21 ; Rom. i. 24, 26, 27. 
 
60 PRELIMINARY PRINCIPLES 
 
 even by name only to antiquaries ; in the advancing cause of 
 Christianity, which promises in the fulness of time to bring all 
 nations within its benign pale ; — I say, when we thus reflect 
 
 On THE DESIGN OF THE SAVIOUR, THE MEANS USED BY HIM 
 TO ACCOMPLISH HIS DESIGN, THE PERSONAL VIRTUES DIS- 
 PLAYED BY HIM, AND THE EFFECTS OF CHRISTIANITY WHICH 
 HAVE BEEN ACCOMPLISHED AND WHICH WE MAY ANTICIPATE, 
 
 — we cannot fail to be satisfied of the immeasurable superiority 
 of our Saviour's moral character, not only over all the real per- 
 sonages who have adorned the annals of mankind, but over the 
 imaginary model drawn after the rich and fruitful imagination 
 of the greatest of the Roman writers, orators, and moralists. 
 
 Such, to wit, the law of the land, the estimate of consequences, 
 and above all the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament, in- 
 cluding our Saviour's moral character, presented as it is for our 
 imitation, are the chief sources by which the consciences of 
 men are to be enlightened and guided. 
 
 It seems proper, in this connexion, to anticipate and dispose 
 of a plausible objection, which has sometimes been urged against 
 the science of moral philosophy. 
 
 It has been supposed by many good men, whose opinions are 
 entitled to much respect, that as the New Testament must com- 
 prise a complete system of Christian morals, there can be no 
 place for moral philosophy ; and, consequently, that this science 
 has been so superseded as to be useless. To this objection it 
 may be replied, 1. That the New Testament is rather the basis 
 of a system of Christian morals than the system itself. It con- 
 tains the root from which the system must grow up ; it is the 
 mine, which, although full of the richest ore, still needs working. 
 
 2. The morals of the New Testament are taught, for the 
 most part, incidentally ; its precepts are thrown out occasion- 
 ally as they were suggested by circumstances and occasions. It 
 is the province of moral philosophy to collect those which relate to 
 the same subject, to classify, illustrate, and apply them. This 
 
AND DISCUSSIONS. 61 
 
 is in some measure the case with the doctrines of the New Tes- 
 tament, but is still more so with respect to its moral principles. 
 
 3. Many of the moral precepts of the New Testament are 
 expressed in absolute terms ; they require to be qualified and 
 limited, and it is the office of moral philosophy to ascertain these 
 limitations and qualifications. Thus, u Children, obey your pa- 
 rents in all things," * "Let wives be subject to their own hus- 
 bands in every thing," f u Submit yourselves to every ordinance 
 of man," J must all be suitably limited and qualified. 
 
 4. Again ; some precepts are proverbial, and describe the 
 spirit and temper at which we ought to aim, rather than the par- 
 ticular actions we are to perform. Such are the directions, not 
 to resist evil, to turn the other cheek, to go with him two miles 
 who shall compel you to go one, to give your cloak to him who 
 by process of law has taken your coat, not to lay up treasures 
 on earth ; § these and many such like maxims are to be com- 
 plied with in the spirit which they teach, and not in their literal 
 meaning. Constant exemplifications of these four observa- 
 tions will be seen, as I proceed to collect, define, expand, illus- 
 trate, and apply the scriptural system of morals, to the various 
 employments, situations, and circumstances of mankind, and to 
 the various relations in life, which they are accustomed to sustain. 
 
 * Col. iii. 20. t Eph. v. 24. J 1 Peter, ii. 13. § Matt. v. 39 - 42. 
 
DIVISION OF THE SUBJECT. 
 
 No particular division of a subject is otherwise important than 
 as it is natural, suited to the subject, sufficiently comprehensive, 
 and contributes to perspicuity and order of arrangement. To 
 secure these ends, writers on moral philosophy have used several 
 divisions, suited to the particular views of the science,' which 
 they have taken themselves, and have wished to communicate to 
 their readers. 
 
 By one ancient division, practical morals were divided into 
 benevolence, prudence, fortitude, and temperance. " Benevo- 
 lence," says Dr. Paley, "proposes good ends; prudence sug- 
 gests the best means of attaining them ; fortitude enables us to 
 encounter the difficulties, dangers, and discouragements which 
 stand in our way in pursuit of these ends ; temperance repels 
 and overcomes the passions that obstruct it. Benevolence, for 
 instance, prompts us to undertake the cause of an oppressed or- 
 phan ; prudence suggests the best means of doing it ; fortitude 
 enables us to confront the danger, and bear up against the loss, 
 disgrace, or repulse that may attend our undertaking ; and tem- 
 perance keeps under the love of money, ease, or amusement, 
 which might divert us from it." * 
 
 By another ancient division, virtue was divided into two 
 branches, prudence and benevolence, — prudence consisting in 
 attention to our own interest, benevolence in a regard for the 
 interests of our fellow-men. The ancient moralists regarded 
 prudence, fortitude, temperance, and justice, as the cardinal vir- 
 tues. But they used these terms with a latitude of meaning quite 
 unknown to them at the present time. 
 
 By wisdom, among the ancients, was understood universal 
 knowledge of things human and divine ; f while prudence {cpgovfjaig) 
 was said to consist in a knowledge of things proper to be desired, 
 or to be avoided. f Prudence, therefore, differed from wisdom, 
 as a part differs from a w 7 hole. Prudence, moreover, with them, 
 
 * Moral and Political Philosophy, p. 25. 
 
 t Cicero de Officiis, Lib. I. c. 43. $ Idem, Lib. I. c. 43 ; Lib. III. c. 17. 
 
DIVISION OF THE SUBJECT. 63 
 
 comprised what we call experience and practical skill, more es- 
 pecially the skill and presence of mind requisite to take measures 
 wisely according to circumstances and emergences.* When all 
 the parts of our nature were in perfect concord with one another, 
 when the passions never aimed at any gratification which reason 
 did not approve, and when reason never commanded any thing 
 but what these, of their own accord, were willing to perform ; 
 this happy composure, this perfect and complete harmony of 
 soul, constituted that virtue, which in the Latin language is ex- 
 pressed by a term which we usually translate temperance, but 
 which might more properly be translated equanimity, or sobriety 
 and moderation of mind.f 
 
 When the high-spirited passions, such as ambition, the love of 
 excellence, the love of honor and the dread of shame, had that 
 degree of strength and firmness, which enabled them, under the 
 direction of reason, to despise all dangers in the pursuit of what 
 was honorable and noble ; it constituted the virtue of fortitude. | 
 The Stoics defined fortitude to consist in courage (virtus) con- 
 tending on the side of justice. § Justice, the last and greatest 
 of the cardinal virtues, was seen, when each of the faculties of 
 the mind confined itself to its proper office, without attempting 
 to encroach upon that of any other ; when reason directed and 
 passion obeyed ; and when each passion performed its proper 
 office, and exerted itself towards its proper object, easily and 
 without reluctance, and with that degree of force and energy, 
 which was suitable to the value of the object pursued. In this 
 consisted that complete virtue, that perfect propriety of conduct, 
 which Plato, after some of the ancient Pythagoreans, denomi- 
 nated justice. || 
 
 In modern times, moral philosophy has usually been divided 
 according to the duties which it enjoins, rather than according to 
 particular virtues ; thus, 1. Our duties towards God ; as piety, 
 reverence, resignation, &c. 2. Our duties towards other men, 
 that is, our relative duties ; as justice, charity, fidelity, &c. 
 
 * Cicero de Officiis, Lib. I. c. 5 ; Lib. II. c. 9. Smith's Moral Sentiments, 
 Vol. II. p. 68. 
 t See Euripides' Medea, 635, 636. Smith's Moral Sentiments, Vol. II. p. 68. 
 t Idem, Vol. II. pp. 67, 68. § Cicero de Officiis, Lib. I. c. 19. 
 
 |f Smith's Moral Sentiments, Vol. II. p. 68. 
 
64 DIVISION OF THE SUBJECT. 
 
 3. Duties towards ourselves ; as the preservation of life, care of 
 health, chastity, sobriety, temperance, &c. This division has 
 been retained by Dr. Paley, but still he does not seem to be 
 satisfied with it.* 
 
 There are duties public and private, personal, domestic, so- 
 cial, and official. There are duties of peace and of war. There 
 are duties appropriate to youth, to middle age, and to advanced 
 life ; duties of sex, of condition, of time, of place, and of cir- 
 cumstance. There are duties of patriotism and of good neigh- 
 bourhood ; duties of health and of sickness. The great and 
 permanent relations of husband and wife, of parents and children, 
 of master and servant, all bring their duties with them. Wealth 
 brings its duties, influence its duties, knowledge its duties, talents 
 their duties, rank its duties, and all the professions and employ- 
 ments of life their corresponding duties. It has not been easy 
 to fix on a division which shall comprise all these particulars, 
 and which shall, at the same time, be natural and perspicuous. 
 After much reflection, I have concluded to use the following ; 
 
 Part I. Our relation to God, and the moral duties thence 
 arising. 
 
 Part II. Our relation to our country, and the moral duties 
 thence arising ; that is, the duties of patriotism. 
 
 Part III. The chief relations of mankind to one another, 
 and the duties thence arising ; that is, the duties which men re- 
 ciprocally owe to each other. 
 
 Part IV. Personal duties, or the duties of men to them- 
 selves. 
 
 Part V. A review of the chief professions and employ- 
 ments of life, so far as regards the moral duties which they 
 involve, their moral principles, practices, influences, tenden- 
 cies, &c. 
 
 Part VI. A special consideration of certain duties and vir- 
 tues, of a character peculiarly Christian ; and a similar consider- 
 tion of certain vices and evils. 
 
 The conclusion of the treatise embraces a review of the chief 
 means on which we are to rely, for improving the moral condition 
 of mankind, and for advancing human happiness. 
 
 * Moral and Political Philosophy, Book IV. p. 215. 
 
PART FIRST. 
 
 OUR RELATION TO GOD, AND THE MORAL DUTIES 
 
 THENCE ARISING. 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 ELUCIDATION OF THIS HIGHEST OF OUR RELATIONS, AND OF THE 
 MORAL INFLUENCE OF A BELIEF IN A SUPREME BEING. 
 
 That high and supreme relation, which connects man with 
 his Maker, cannot fail, if our minds have not been debased by 
 sin, or perverted by sophistry, to be considered by us, as of all, 
 the most sublime and interesting. Our Maker is not only the 
 supreme and ultimate cause of our existence, but our kind and 
 unceasing Benefactor. As he has existed from everlasting, so he 
 will continue to exist to everlasting. The heavens which cover 
 us, and the earth which lies beneath our feet, as well as our- 
 selves, are the workmanship of his hands. His power is infi- 
 nite, his wisdom is unerring, his benevolence is perfect. Be- 
 sides conferring upon us an immortal existence, all our hopes 
 and prospects for time and eternity depend on our securing his 
 favor and averting his displeasure. 
 
 Human excellence, even when most conspicuous, is blended 
 with many imperfections, and seen amidst many defects. It is 
 beheld only in detached and separate fragments, nor ever ap- 
 pears, in any one character, perfect and entire. So that when, 
 in imitation of the Stoics, we wish to form out of these frag- 
 ments the image of a perfectly wise and good man, we are sen- 
 sible, that it is a mere fiction of the mind, without any real 
 being in whom it is embodied and realized. In the belief of a 
 Deity, however, these conceptions are reduced to reality ; the 
 scattered rays of an ideal excellence are concentrated, and be- 
 come the real attributes of that Being with whom we stand in 
 9 
 
66 OUR RELATION TO THE DEITY. [Part I. 
 
 the nearest relation, who sits supreme at the head of the uni- 
 verse, and pervades all nature by his presence and power. 
 
 The idea of the Supreme Being has this peculiar property ; 
 that, as it admits of no substitute, so, from the first moment it 
 is formed, it is capable of continual growth and enlargement. 
 God himself is immutable, but our conception of his character 
 is continually receiving fresh accessions, is continually becoming 
 more extended and glorious, by having transferred to it new 
 elements of sublimity and goodness, by attracting to itself, as a 
 centre, whatever bears the impress of beauty, order, dignity, 
 and happiness. It unites the splendor of every species of ex- 
 cellence ; of all that is fair, great, and good in the universe. 
 The idea of a Supreme Being, and of a superintending Provi- 
 dence, invests the universe with all that is finished and consum- 
 mate in sublimity and excellence. The admiration of perfect 
 wisdom and goodness for which we are formed, and which kin- 
 dles such glowing rapture in the soul, finds in this idea a source 
 of full and exhaustless satisfaction. Thus contemplated, the 
 world presents a fair spectacle of order, beauty, and harmony, of 
 a vast family nourished and watched over by an Almighty 
 Father. 
 
 When we reflect, therefore, on the manner in which the idea 
 of Deity is formed, and on the sublime interest which a belief 
 in the Deity, the first fair, the first sublime, the first good, im- 
 parts to the universe, we must be convinced, that such an idea 
 and such a belief, intimately present to the mind, must have a 
 most powerful effect in imbuing the mind with right moral 
 tastes, affections, and, habits, — the elements of moral character, 
 and the springs of moral action. The efficacy of these views 
 in producing and augmenting virtuous tastes and habits, will, 
 indeed, be proportioned to the vividness with which they are 
 formed, and the frequency with which they recur ; yet some 
 benefit will not fail to result from them even in their lowest de- 
 gree. And as the object of religious worship will always be, 
 in some measure, the object of imitation, hence arises a fixed 
 standard of moral excellence ; by the contemplation of which, 
 the tendencies of man to wickedness are counteracted, the conta- 
 gion of evil example is checked, and human nature rises above 
 
Chap. I.] MORAL INFLUENCE OF A BELIEF IN GOD. 67 
 
 its natural level. Our conception of the Deity, then, composed 
 as it is of the richest moral elements, embraces, under the 
 character of a Beneficent Parent and Almighty Ruler, whatever 
 is venerable in wisdom, whatever is awful in authority, whatever 
 is touching in goodness ; and a belief in this Supreme Being, 
 and in his superintending Providence, has always been accom- 
 panied by a salutary moral influence on mankind.* 
 
 The argument, which has been advanced respecting the great 
 and special moral influence arising from a belief in a God and 
 his superintending Providence, may be confirmed by an appeal 
 to the recorded convictions of mankind, as seen in the writings 
 of all times and every country. And this is a position of so 
 much importance, that it may be well to set it in a perfectly 
 clear light, by subjoining a few illustrations of this kind. 
 
 Mr. Addison, in the person of Cato, has well declared the 
 natural and settled convictions of mankind at all times. 
 
 " If there 's a power above us, 
 And that there is, all nature cries aloud 
 Through all her works, he must delight in virtue ; 
 And that which he delights in must be happy ; " — 
 
 that is, must lead men to happiness. f An oath for confirma- 
 tion, — >an end of all strife, \ is coeval with any considerable ad- 
 vancement in civilization among all nations, and is a public re- 
 cognition of the moral influence of a belief in a Divinity, 
 equally familiar and venerable. The moral influence of a be- 
 lief in a Divinity, shows, moreover, the indissoluble connexion 
 which subsists between religion and morals, as also between reli- 
 gious sentiment and moral character and conduct. " Let no one," 
 says Plato, u utter falsehood, or deceive, or commit any impure 
 act with an invocation of the gods, unless he wishes to render 
 himself hateful to the Divinity." § The prayer of Cyrus when 
 death was approaching, is instructive in the same point of view.[| 
 The works of Cicero are everywhere rich in instruction to the 
 same effect. " However much," says he, " we may be disposed 
 to exalt our advantages, it is nevertheless certain, that we have 
 been surpassed in population by the Spaniards, in physical force 
 
 * Robert Hall's Works, Vol. I. p. 30. t Tragedy of Cato, V. 1. 
 
 % Heb. vi. 16. § Quoted by Rosenmtlller, in Exod. xx. 7. 
 
 || Xenophon, Cyri Disciplina, Lib. VIII. c. 7. 
 
68 OUR RELATION TO THE DEITY. [Part I. 
 
 by the Gauls, in shrewdness and cunning by Carthage, in the 
 fine arts by Greece, and in mere native talent by some of our 
 Italian fellow-countrymen ; but, in the single point of attention to 
 religion, we have exceeded other nations, and it is by the fa- 
 vorable influence of this circumstance upon the character of the 
 people, that I account for our success in acquiring the political and 
 military ascendency that we now enjoy throughout the world." * 
 All who are familiar with the Greek tragedies know how many 
 illustrations might be drawn from thence. I content myself with 
 a single specimen from Sophocles' CEdipus Tyrannus. The 
 Chorus sings thus ; — line 863, &c. 
 
 " Grant me, henceforth, ye powers divine, 
 In virtue's purest paths to tread ; 
 In every word, in every deed, 
 May sanctity of manners ever shine, 
 Obedient to the laws of Jove, 
 The laws descended from above." 
 
 Again, 
 
 " Perish the impious and profane, 
 Who, void of reverential fear, 
 Nor justice nor the laws revere ; 
 Who leave their God, for pleasure or for gain ; 
 Who swell by fraud their ill-got store ; 
 Who rob the wretched and the poor." 
 
 But the most instructive passage to be found in all heathen anti- 
 quity, illustrative of the moral effect of a belief in " a power 
 above us," is in Claudian, and must be familiar to every classi- 
 cal scholar. f Such is a specimen of the recorded convictions 
 of heathen writers on this subject ; and it shows, among other 
 things, how much superior, in its moral tendency, heathenism 
 is to the atheism, or even to the skepticism of our days. 
 
 I scarcely know whether it may be advisable to add any 
 thing to the preceding from Christian times and Christian authors ; 
 but, at the risk of doing what is superfluous, I will subjoin some 
 few confirmations of this kind. To collect, however, the senti- 
 ments of individuals would be an endless task, and, after all, might 
 not be satisfactory. It may be more useful to resort for testi- 
 
 * Quoted by A. H. Everett, in the Senate of Massachusetts, 1831. 
 t In Rufinum, Lib. I. ; translated in the London Quarterly Review, No. 
 LXXXV. p. 187. 
 
Chap. I.] MORAL INFLUENCE OF A BELIEF IN GOD. 69 
 
 mony to distinguished bo-dies or communities of men, and to this 
 end, I will quote a few examples of the deliberate and well-con- 
 sidered sentiments of the American Revolutionary Congress. 
 
 On occasion of recommending a fast, this Congress declared, 
 that " the great Governor of the world, by his supreme and uni- 
 versal Providence, not only conducts the course of nature with 
 unerring wisdom and rectitude, but frequently influences the 
 minds of men to serve the wise and gracious purposes of his 
 providential government; that it is, at all times, our indispensable 
 duty devoutly to acknowledge his superintending Providence, 
 and to reverence and adore his immutable justice." * They say, 
 (March 16th, 1776,) they are "desirous to have people of all 
 ranks and degrees duly impressed with a solemn sense of God's 
 superintending Providence, and of their duty devoutly to rely, in 
 all their lawful enterprises, on his aid and direction." They 
 declare the end of setting apart the day to be, "that we may 
 with united hearts confess and bewail our manifold sins and trans- 
 gressions, and, by a sincere repentance and amendment of life, 
 appease his righteous displeasure, and, through the merits and 
 mediation of Jesus Christ, obtain his pardon and forgiveness." 
 March 7th, 1778, they recommend a similar day, "that, at one 
 time and with one voice, the inhabitants may acknowledge the 
 righteous dispensations of Divine Providence, confess their in- 
 iquities and transgressions, and implore the mercy and forgiveness 
 of God, and beseech him that vice, profaneness, extortion, and 
 every evil may be done away, and that we may be a reformed and 
 happy people" Another proclamation of March 11th, 1780, 
 recommends, " that we may, with one heart and one voice, im- 
 plore the Sovereign Lord of heaven and earth to remember 
 mercy in his judgments, to make us sincerely penitent for our 
 transgressions, to banish vice and irreligion from among us, and 
 establish virtue and piety by his divine grace." March 20th, 
 1781, u That we may with united hearts confess and bewail our 
 manifold sins and transgressions, and by sincere repentance and 
 amendment of life, appease his righteous displeasure, and, through 
 the merits of our blessed Saviour, obtain pardon and forgiveness ; 
 
 * Journals of Congress, 12th June, 1775. 
 
70 OUR RELATION TO THE DEITY. [Part I. 
 
 that it may please him to inspire our rulers with incorruptible 
 integrity, and to direct and prosper their councils ; that it may 
 please him to bless all schools and seminaries of learning, and 
 to grant that truth, justice , and benevolence, and pure and unde- 
 jiled religion may universally prevail." 
 
 Such is a small specimen of the sentiments of the illustrious 
 fathers of the American revolution, on the moral tendency and 
 effect of a belief in God and his superintending Providence. 
 They do honor to their authors, and are the best illustration, by 
 way of authority, of the practical moral efficacy of a belief in 
 the God of heaven and earth, which could well be given. I may 
 fear having done them injustice by quoting so small a part of their 
 valuable sentiments, dispersed through the Congressional docu- 
 ments. They are worthy of the serious and careful perusal of 
 every American citizen. * 
 
 Belief in God, then, and in his superintending Providence, is 
 alike the foundation of morals and of religion. In God is con- 
 centrated all that is sublime, glorious, holy, and happy. A belief 
 in him includes something more than a mere acknowledgment of 
 his existence ; it includes a belief in him, as he has made himself 
 known in his works, f and more especially in the revelation which 
 he has made of himself, his nature, his attributes, and his will 
 respecting mankind, in the Scriptures of the Old and New Testa- 
 ment. But the moral effect of a belief in God, and of the great 
 truths embraced in such belief, will depend very much on the 
 strength and vividness of our conviction and on the fulness and 
 exactness of the instruction which we have received. 
 
 Unquestionably, the existence of God, of his Providence, and 
 of the great truths of Divine revelation, may be acknowledged in 
 general terms, without a corresponding moral effect being seen in 
 the life and conversation. The heathen, whose case St. Paul 
 describes, | acknowledged God, (knew God,) still they glorified 
 him not as God, neither were thankful ; but became vain in their 
 imaginations and their foolish heart was darkened. So darkened, 
 
 * Larger portions of them are quoted, and all of them are referred to, in Note 
 E. pp. 35-39, of a Sermon preached by the Author before the Convention of 
 the Protestant Episcopal Church of the Diocese of South Carolina, 1833. 2d ed. 
 
 t Rom. i. 20. $ Rom. i. 19-32. 
 
Chap. II.] DUTY OF REVERENCING GOD. 71 
 
 indeed, did their understandings become, by reason of their re- 
 jecting the knowledge of God, that although they professed them- 
 selves to be wise, they were guilty of the foolishness of changing 
 the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like to 
 corruptible man, and to birds, and four-footed beasts, and creep- 
 ing things ; and moreover, of changing the truth of God into a 
 lie, and worshipping and serving the creature more than the Crea- 
 tor, who is blessed for ever. It was for this, that God gave them 
 up to unnatural lusts and every species of vile affections. Grow- 
 ing worse and worse, u as they did not like to retain God in their 
 knowledge," (v. 28,) " he gave them over to a reprobate mind," 
 and, after their hardness and impenitent hearts, to treasure up 
 wrath to themselves against the day of wrath and the revelation of 
 the righteous judgment of God.* To prevent a declension to the 
 ways of vice and the depths of sin so fatal, and to keep up in 
 men's minds that strong conviction and deep sense of God, 
 which is the root and branch of practical morals, and which the 
 Scriptures call faith in him, we must rely on the conscientious 
 performance of the duties which spring from the relation which 
 we sustain to him ; which duties are now to be examined and 
 unfolded. 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 THE GENERAL DUTY OF REVERENCING GOD. 
 
 When submitted to a careful and exact analysis, reverence for 
 the Deity comprises a deep sense of our own insignificance, — 
 of his divine majesty, his incomprehensible nature, his eternal 
 existence, knowing equally no beginning and no end ; of his 
 Almighty power, to which all things are equally easy, and in 
 whose operations all degrees of facility, whether in the creation 
 of a world or of an atom, are unknown ; of our ignorance, and of 
 his omniscience and divine wisdom, unsearchable and past finding 
 
 * Rom. ii. 5. 
 
72 OUR RELATION TO THE DEITY. [Part I. 
 
 out ; a sense of our dependence, and of his absolute and perfect 
 independence of time, place, circumstances, and events ; a 
 sense of our sinfulness, and of his immaculate and essential holi- 
 ness, in whose sight the very heavens are unclean. * 
 
 Reverence for God includes, moreover, reverence for his 
 name, which is holy and reverend, f and not to be used in vain ; 
 for his attributes, his revelation of himself, his worship, and his 
 ordinances. It comprises again, a respectful regard for his 
 ministers who serve at the altar, for the edifices consecrated to 
 his service, and for whatever else pertains to the celebration of 
 his worship. It is not necessary to say, that levity in regard 
 to these subjects, or any of them, and still more all sneering and 
 scoffing, are totally inconsistent with the smallest degree of rever- 
 ence for God. They indicate a heart destitute of every vestige 
 of religious feeling, an understanding steeled against all conviction 
 of religious truth, and both a heart and an understanding equally 
 inaccessible to any religious impression. In such a state of the 
 feelings, the truth can take no hold on the consciences of men, 
 and no fair and candid estimate can be made of the all-command- 
 ing claims, sanctions, and evidences of religion. In this condi- 
 tion, they are beyond the reach of human aid ; and there is, in 
 truth, no aid for them, but in the awakening, enlightening, and 
 sanctifying power and grace of that Holy Spirit, from whom " all 
 holy desires, all good counsels, and all just works proceed." 
 The fate of despisers of the truth and ordinances of God is, to 
 wonder and perish. Their perdition shall be amazing and won- 
 derful to themselves and all around them. They are men rep- 
 robate concerning the faith and to every good work. J 
 
 What has been said of ridicule, sneering, and scoffing, applies 
 substantially to all sarcasms, jestings, and even pleasantry, when 
 exercised upon the Scriptures, or upon the places, persons, and 
 forms set apart for the service of religion. They are alike in- 
 consistent with a religious frame of mind ; for, as no one ever 
 either feels himself disposed to pleasantry, or capable of being 
 diverted with the pleasantry of others, upon matters in which he 
 is deeply interested ; so a mind intent upon the acquisition of 
 
 * Job xv. 15. t Ps. cxi. 9. i Acts xiii. 41 ; 2 Tim. iii. 8; Tit. i. 16. 
 
Chap. III.] DUTY OF WORSHIPPING GOD. 73 
 
 heaven rejects, with indignation, every attempt to entertain it 
 with jests, calculated to degrade or deride subjects which it 
 never recollects but with seriousness and anxiety. Nothing but 
 stupidity, or the most frivolous dissipation of thought, can make 
 even the inconsiderate forget the supreme importance of every 
 thing which relates to the expectation of a future existence. 
 Whilst the infidel mocks at the superstitions of the vulgar, as he 
 chooses to consider them, insults over their credulous fears, their 
 childish errors, or fantastic rites, it does not occur to him to 
 observe, that the most preposterous device, by which the weakest 
 devotee ever believed he was securing the happiness of a future 
 life, is more rational than unconcern about it. Upon this sub- 
 ject, nothing is so absurd as indifference ; no folly so absurd as 
 thoughtlessness and levity. * 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 THE DUTY OF WORSHIPPING GOD. 
 
 There is a distinction between reverencing and worshipping 
 God. Both are external duties, and God is the immediate object 
 of both ; the distinction between them is, that the one is nega- 
 tive, the other positive ; the one consists in abstaining from some 
 impious act, the other in performing some act of piety. When, 
 from a sense of duty to God, we rest on Sunday during a jour- 
 ney, we perform a duty of reverence ; when, from the same 
 motive, we attend church on Sunday, we perform an act of 
 worship. f 
 
 The special object of worshipping God, is, to keep up that 
 reverence for him in the mind, which cannot be preserved with- 
 out habitual attendance on some external service, by which a 
 habit of devotion and reverence, and their consequent moral 
 influences may be maintained. The formation, preservation, 
 and strengthening of this habit of devotion and reverence for 
 
 * Paley's Moral and Political Philosophy, p. 270. t Idem, p. 230. 
 
 10 
 
74 OUR RELATION TO THE DEITY. [Part I. 
 
 God and divine things, together with instruction in the doctrines 
 and duties of Christianity, are the aim and end of divine worship, 
 and in them its public and private benefit consists. 
 
 This subject is an important one, and comprises, — the natu- 
 ralness and reasonableness of divine worship, private and public ; 
 — the subject matter of which, prayer, thanksgiving, and praise 
 ought to consist ; — a review of the part of public worship designed 
 specially for instruction, consisting of the reading of the Scrip- 
 tures, preaching, and catechetical instruction; — and an illustra- 
 tion of the benefits, public and private, of divine worship, when 
 attended with diligence and with a suitable temper and spirit. 
 
 1. The naturalness and reasonableness of divine worship, pri- 
 vate and public. A conviction of the existence and influence, 
 as has before been said, of "a power above us," which guides 
 our destinies, to which we are responsible, to which we are 
 bound equally by duty and interest to have regard, whose favor 
 we may gain and whose displeasure we may propitiate, by some 
 exertions which we may use and some sacrifices which we may 
 make, seems, in all ages and among all nations, to have been 
 irresistibly forced on the understandings of mankind. * Under 
 the influence of this natural conviction, men have always raised 
 their minds in prayer to some superior Being, or beings, as is 
 attested by the literary remains of every nation under heaven. It 
 is true that this natural sentiment has often been greatly obscured 
 by ignorance, by neglect, and by great misuse and perversion of 
 talents ; but no debasement of savage life, of false religion, or 
 even of settled habits of sin, formed, cherished, and persevered in 
 amidst the bright shining of the Gospel itself, has been able en- 
 tirely to suppress and drive it from the human mind. 
 
 Accordingly, the literature of Greek and Roman antiquity, 
 and the Hindoo and Chinese literature of the present day, are 
 filled with prayers and thanksgivings to the various deities which 
 they acknowledged. These are the more cultivated forms of 
 heathenism, but its ruder forms all contain evidences of the same 
 natural sentiment and feeling. This may be called natural piety ; 
 and however obscured and perverted, it is still good proof of the 
 natural conviction described by St. Paul, and of the natural sen- 
 
 * Romans i. 20. 
 
Chap. Ill] DUTY OF WORSHIPPING GOD. 75 
 
 timent and feeling evinced by mankind. Some of these prayers, 
 the offspring of this natural piety, and of an unperverted con- 
 science, are not without pure and sublime conceptions of the 
 Deity, and just views of human wants suitable to be expressed 
 in prayer. Dr. Lowth says of the Hymn of Cleantbes, the 
 Stoic, inscribed to Jove, — " It is doubtless a most noble monu- 
 ment of ancient wisdom, and replete with truths not less solid 
 than magnificent. For, the sentiments of the philosopher con- 
 cerning the divine power, concerning the harmony of nature and 
 the supreme laws, concerning the folly and unhappiness of wicked 
 men, who are unceasingly subject to the pain and perturbation of 
 a troubled spirit, and above all," continues he, " the ardent sup- 
 plication for the divine assistance, in order to enable him to cele- 
 brate the praises of the Omnipotent Deity in a suitable manner, 
 and in a perpetual strain of praise and adoration ; all of these 
 breathe so true and unaffected a spirit of piety, that they seem in 
 some measure to approach the excellence of the sacred poetry." # 
 The Mahometan religion is partly derived from Judaism and 
 Christianity, and is less absurd than any form of heathenism. 
 The habit of public prayer among the Mahometans is well 
 known. In such countries, the Mouzeens on the minarets f are 
 accustomed, 
 
 " to proclaim the hour 
 For prayer appointed, and with sonorous voice, 
 Thrice in melodious modulation full, 
 To pronounce the highest name. l There is no God 
 But God,' they cry ; ' there is no God but God ! 
 Mahommed is the Prophet of the Lord ! 
 Come ye to prayer ! to prayer ! The Lord is great ! 
 There is no God but God ! '" 
 
 It cannot be necessary to do more than merely advert, in this 
 connexion, to the frequency and earnestness with which the Jew- 
 ish and Christian Scriptures enjoin the same duty. Men of all 
 climes, then, of all ages, and of all religions, have concurred in 
 the propriety and the practice of lifting up the mind to God in 
 prayer. This universality is the best of all proofs of the natu- 
 ralness of Divine worship. 
 
 * Lectures on the Sacred Poetry of the Hebrews. Lect. XXIX. Gregory's 
 Translation, 
 t See Walsh's National Gazette, Nov. 7th, 1835. 
 
76 OUR RELATION TO THE DEITY. [Part I. 
 
 The reasonableness of Divine worship might be inferred from 
 the mere fact of its being natural, as we have seen ; but it may- 
 be well to give it some further illustration. Prayer is expressive 
 of our dependence upon God ; and, as all our privileges and en- 
 joyments are the effects of his unmerited goodness, it becomes 
 us to ask, if we would receive them. Man is created in God's 
 own image ; * there must, then, be such a resemblance between 
 the image and the high Original, as to justify us in reasoning 
 analogically, provided we do it with sufficient caution, from the 
 image to the Original. We all know how much men are influ- 
 enced by a request made in a suitable temper and spirit. And, 
 if this is reasonable in men, made after the image of God, is it 
 not reasonable, that the Great Original should be influenced by 
 prayer proffered before his throne in the spirit of dependence, 
 and in acknowledgment that every good and perfect gift comes 
 from him ? 
 
 It is reasonable, moreover, that we should not only offer up 
 prayer and thanksgiving privately, but also in public. For God 
 is to be regarded as the universal benefactor of mankind, from 
 whom we all have received public blessings, and to whom, there- 
 fore, we owe public acknowledgments. Private prayer and 
 thanksgiving are, by no means, adequate returns for public 
 blessings. 
 
 Convinced, then, that prayer and thanksgiving are both natural 
 and reasonable, and knowing that they are enjoined as an imper- 
 ative Christian duty, we shall not be moved by the skeptical 
 sophism, " If it be most agreeable to perfect wisdom and justice 
 that we should receive what we desire, God, as perfectly wise 
 and just, will give it to us without asking ; if it be not agreeable 
 to these attributes of his nature, our entreaties cannot move him 
 to give it us, and it were impious to expect that they should." 
 More briefly thus ; "If what we request be fit for us, we shall 
 have it without praying ; if it be not fit for us, we cannot ob- 
 tain it by praying." f 
 
 This is the substance of all that can be said against prayer, — 
 and it admits of an answer entirely satisfactory. It is very true, 
 
 * Gen. i. 27; Col. iii. 10. t Paley's Moral and Polit. Phil., p. 231. 
 
Chap. III.] DUTY OF WORSHIPPING GOD. 77 
 
 that God will grant us what is fit ; but it is equally true, that it 
 is not fit for him to throw away his favors upon those who will 
 not pray for them with an humble sense of their dependence, and 
 receive them with a grateful sense of his goodness. God is a 
 perfect being, but it is no attribute of a perfect being to be inex- 
 orable. God grants our petitions, not merely because we pray, 
 but because prayer, sincere and earnest prayer, though it does 
 not make him more willing to bestow, makes us more Jit and 
 more qualified to receive his favors. The fitness of the thing 
 depends upon the qualifications of the individual, and the qualifi- 
 cation of the individual to receive, depends upon that holy, hum- 
 ble frame of mind, from which all sincere prayer proceeds. It 
 is not said, that the Deity is changed by our prayers, but that 
 the relation in which we stand to the Deity is changed, when, 
 from living in sin and disregard of God, we come to adore him 
 in sincerity and truth. 
 
 2. The subject matter of which prayer and thanksgiving ought 
 to consist. Prayer and thanksgiving, whether written or extem- 
 poraneous, are, so far as the matter and style are concerned, gov- 
 erned by the same rules. They should contain just conceptions of 
 the Deity and of his attributes. Unworthy conceptions of God 
 destroy or impair the purity and dignity of public worship, in 
 which all things should u be done decently and in order," * and 
 prevent it from having that moral influence which it is so well 
 calculated to exercise. Men of every condition attend public 
 worship, and erroneous or unworthy conceptions of the Deity 
 thus become the error of multitudes. 
 
 Again, they should express only those wants, desires, and 
 aspirations, which will probably be felt by the congregation. 
 Ideas in which the congregation can feel no interest, should not 
 be introduced. Those prayers are the most suitable, which are 
 best fitted to keep alive the devotion of the assembly. Confes- 
 sion of sin, humiliation before God for its commission, petitions 
 for forgiveness, acknowledgment of divine mercies, and aspira- 
 tions after increased holiness, must enter into the prayers of " all 
 orders and estates of men." They should contain, also, as few 
 
 * 1 Cor. xiv. 40. 
 
78 OUR RELATION TO THE DEITY. [Part I. 
 
 controverted sentiments as possible. Scriptural ideas, scriptural 
 sentiments, subjects, and even expressions, or such as are close- 
 ly analogous to them, should be principally, if not exclusively 
 used. The style of prayer and thanksgiving should be calm, 
 solemn, dignified, earnest, and pathetic. Every thing light, and 
 especially all quaintness, affectation, smartness, and prettiness of 
 expression, are inconsistent with every part of divine worship, 
 and most of all with prayer and thanksgiving.* 
 
 Among the subjects of prayer, we are encouraged in Scrip- 
 ture to pray for national blessings, to intercede for others, to re- 
 peat unsuccessful prayer, he. ; — but we are most particularly 
 encouraged and enjoined to pray for the Holy Spirit, to the in- 
 fluences of whom " all holy desires, all good counsels, and all just 
 works " are ascribed. f The fruit of the Spirit, for which we 
 are taught to pray, is love, joy, peace, long-suffering, gentleness, 
 goodness, faith, meekness, temperance, in all righteousness and 
 truth4 
 
 It would be absurd to deny the operations of the Holy Spirit 
 because we are not sensible of them, and do not know how God 
 influences the soul.§ We ought rather to reason thus ; we 
 know that we have been holden up by God ever since we were 
 born ; yet we have not an intimate consciousness and feeling of 
 that influence by which he sustains us, or any knowledge how he 
 upholds our existence ; — in the same manner, we prove from 
 Scripture, that he conveys his grace to us, but are strangers to 
 the manner in which he dispenses it. We are as much depend- 
 ent on the assistance of God for our spiritual life, as we are for 
 our natural life ; and the manner in which this assistance is com- 
 municated is as much unknown in the one case as in the other. 
 It is no objection to this doctrine, that the powers of nature and 
 the influences of grace are so blended within us that we cannot 
 easily distinguish them. For, no more can we, in all cases, dis- 
 tinguish our foreign acquirements from the fruits of our own ge- 
 nius. We can no more exactly determine, in every particular, 
 
 * Paley, Moral and Political Philosophy, pp. 210-214. 
 t Luke xi. 13; John xiv. 26 ; Acts vi. 3 ; Rom. v. 5. 
 t Gal. v. 22; Eph. v. 9. § John iii. 8. 
 
Chap. III.] DUTY OF WORSHIPPING GOD. 79 
 
 what is natural to us, and what has been acquired by us, than we 
 can what is the effect of our own endeavours, and what is the 
 result of the influences of the Holy Spirit. 
 
 Those, who disbelieve the assistances of divine grace because 
 they have not an inward sense of them, should consider, that an 
 inward and distinct perception of the motions of the Holy Spirit 
 would be inconsistent with that degree of freedom, which is neces- 
 sary to a state of probation. If we could trace the inward work- 
 ings of the Spirit, it would be too great a restraint upon us, and 
 would overpower the will. Such a manifest evidence of the 
 divine presence in us, as the sensible influence of the Holy 
 Spirit, would be overbearing and irresistible, and would impair, 
 if not destroy, the freedom of the will. We walk by faith and 
 not by sights — by faith grounded upon rational and substantial 
 proofs, — not by sight, not by any sensible indications of the 
 Spirit dwelling in us, and working distinctly in us. The proof 
 of the indwelling of the Spirit consists in the effects produced 
 upon our hearts and lives. 
 
 3. Of the part of divine service which consists in giving in- 
 struction by reading the Scriptures, preaching, and catechetical 
 instruction, it does not seem necessary for a moral philosopher 
 to notice any but preaching and catechetical instruction. The 
 object of preaching is, to enlighten ignorance on the most im- 
 portant of all subjects, to rouse indifference, to awaken the care- 
 less, to encourage the desponding, and to edify and build up the 
 pious in the holy faith and order of the Gospel. To effect 
 all this, the preacher has peculiar advantages. He is invested 
 with a commission from the King of kings ; and, by virtue of this 
 commission, he proclaims truth of transcendent importance. The 
 pastoral relation, too, by which the preacher is connected with 
 his flock, is one of the most interesting which exists on earth. 
 The preacher publishes truth, also, in the most effective of all 
 ways, — by the living voice. He announces it, moreover, to 
 an assembly withdrawn from the business, the amusements, and 
 the perplexities of the world, and on a day set apart for this 
 peculiar, this holy purpose. With a view to effect and impres- 
 sion, he may select any subject within the wide range of theology 
 and morals. One of the strongest passions of mankind is love 
 
80 OUR RELATION TO THE DEITY. [Part I. 
 
 of variety ; and the customs of the pulpit permit him to turn this 
 passion to good account, by availing himself of the services of 
 his brethren in exchange for his own. Cowper may be pre- 
 sumed to have had these advantages in mind when he said, — 
 
 " The pulpit, in the sober use 
 Of its legitimate, peculiar powers, 
 
 Must stand acknowledged, while the world shall stand, 
 The most important and effectual guard, 
 Support, and ornament of virtue's cause." * 
 
 There are two points on which it merits an inquiry, whether 
 the pulpit might not be made more effectual for its great pur- 
 poses than it usually has been. It may well be doubted, whether 
 the pulpit has not exerted its immense power too exclusively in 
 the illustration and enforcement of doctrines, and to the neglect 
 of morals. f While doctrinal sermons abound everywhere, — 
 how small, comparatively, is the number of sermons in which 
 Christian morals are very ably discussed and illustrated. This 
 neglect to illustrate and enforce the moral duties of Christianity 
 seems to have been increasing during the last century, and exists 
 more in this country than in Great Britain. If the whole 
 strength of the pulpit, u in the exercise of its legitimate peculiar 
 powers," were directed against certain immoral maxims, habits, 
 and usages, which extensively prevail, it is not to be doubted, 
 that, within a few years, a much more healthful moral tone might 
 
 * The Task, Book II. 
 
 t On this topic, I am in danger of being misunderstood, and this I am anxious 
 to prevent. The term " moral preacher " has unfortunately become a term of 
 reproach, both in this country and in England. This reproachful use of the 
 term undoubtedly arose from the delinquencies of a certain class of English 
 preachers, whose sermons are described by Dr. Southey, as containing " nothing 
 to rouse a slumbering conscience, nothing to alarm the soul at a sense of its 
 danger, no difficulties expounded to confirm the wavering, no mighty truths 
 enforced to rejoice the faithful, — to look for theology here," continues he, 
 " would be seeking pears from the elm ; — only a little smooth morality, such as 
 Turk, Jew, or Infidel may listen to without offence, sparkling with metaphors 
 and similes, and rounded off with a text of Scripture, a scrap of poetry, or, better 
 than either, a quotation from Ossian." (Espriella's Letters, Vol. I. p. 210.) 
 To prevent all misunderstanding of my meaning, I will illustrate it by examples. 
 Dr. Beecher's " Six Sermons on Intemperance," — Bishop Jeremy Taylor's two 
 Sermons on the " Wedding Ring," — and the great body of Dr. Barrow's Ser- 
 mons, are specimens of what I mean and recommend by moral preaching. 
 
Chap. III.] DUTY OF WORSHIPPING GOD. 81 
 
 be infused into society. We see what might be done by the 
 pulpit in restraining other vices, by what it has done in check- 
 ing the evil of intemperate drinking. 
 
 Again, the instructions of the pulpit are too much of a desul- 
 tory character. The preacher discusses one subject on the 
 morning of Sunday, another in the afternoon, and still another 
 on the morning of the coming Sunday. In this respect, the 
 pulpit is unlike any other place of instruction. Every teacher 
 and every learner of the sciences understands the importance of 
 method and connexion in his instructions, and that he cannot 
 expect success without them. Is not this want of systematic, 
 connected instruction, too little regarded in the pulpit ? The 
 usual method of unconnected preaching, seems to have originated 
 in the inability of the clergy to prepare a systematic, well-di- 
 gested course of pulpit instruction. Many men are qualified to 
 preach on subjects selected without regard to connexion, who 
 would be inadequate to prepare a systematic, instructive course. 
 But clerical education is so much advanced at the present day, 
 that very many clergymen must be fully qualified to discuss, 
 illustrate, and enforce the doctrines and morals of Christianity, 
 with system and due connexion. 
 
 The truth is, that the usual style of preaching has considerable 
 merits joined with very striking defects ; so striking, indeed, 
 that I am convinced, the pulpit is deprived of very much of its 
 legitimate power by their existence. It merits the serious and 
 mature consideration of those who have authority and influence 
 in the church, whether there ought not to be at least a partial 
 change. Might not the peculiar advantages of the customary 
 and the systematic style be* combined, by giving the mornings of 
 Sundays to systematic preaching, and the afternoons to preach- 
 ing on subjects selected with reference to the peculiar condition, 
 wants, and circumstances of the congregation. By this change, 
 should we not retain the excellences and remedy the defects of 
 the present style of preaching ? 
 
 It has been matter of regret with pious men generally, that 
 
 catechetical instruction has fallen into such neglect in late times. 
 
 In the primitive ages of the church, there was a well-known 
 
 class of religious teachers named catechists, whose office it was, 
 
 11 
 
82 OUR RELATION TO THE DEITY. [Part I. 
 
 to instruct children in the elements of the Christian religion. In 
 primitive times, too, there were great numbers of catechumens 
 who had come to years of discretion ; but, having been born of 
 heathen parents, had not been baptized ; — these also were in- 
 structed by catechists, preparatory to baptism. At present, 
 children are generally instructed in the catechism, when they re- 
 ceive any instruction, by their parents, and are at stated times 
 examined, in the church after divine service, by the minister 
 of the parish to which they belong. This union of parental 
 and clerical instruction in the rudiments of Christianity, has 
 many advantages to recommend it ; and, in many parishes, is so 
 conducted, as, in a very good degree, to accomplish its object. 
 Sunday school instruction, moreover, has, within the last half- 
 century, taken the place, in a great measure, of the ancient 
 system of catechetical instruction. Still, immense numbers of 
 children continue to receive little or no religious education, and 
 the general regret of pious men, above adverted to, still continues 
 to be not without just grounds. The first principles of reli- 
 gion, must, still more than those of other subjects, in order to 
 be taught effectively, be taught during early childhood and youth. 
 Even with the best religious education of children, there is al- 
 ways too much reason to fear, that, as they advance in life, the 
 cares of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, and the lusts 
 of other things entering in, may choke the instruction given, and 
 render it unfruitful.* 
 
 4. The benefits, both private and public, which wait on public 
 worship, are neither few nor small. Prayer has a manifest ten- 
 dency to nourish in us those very graces and virtues for which 
 we pray. We shall earnestly desire lhat for which we habitually 
 and earnestly pray ; and what we earnestly desire, we shall en- 
 deavour to attain. Warm desires naturally ripen into corre- 
 sponding conduct, made manifest in the life and conversation. 
 
 Again, by prostrating ourselves in prayer before Him who is 
 clothed with majesty and honor, the pride, arrogance, and self- 
 sufficiency of prosperity are checked, and the discouragement, 
 depression, and despair of adversity are softened and relieved. 
 
 * Mark iv. 19. 
 
Chap. Ill] DUTY OF WORSHIPPING GOD. 83 
 
 Its influence, too, in aiding us to curb our passions, which are 
 always too impatient of restraint, is very great. A habit of 
 prayer accustoms us to a sense of the Divine presence, and se- 
 cures us all its accompanying moral influences. It cherishes in 
 us universal benevolence, an enlarged humanity, and a tender and 
 sympathizing temper. Those pure and exalted sentiments and 
 feelings, to which we accustom ourselves in the hours of devotion, 
 will open and enlarge the understanding w T ith the most sincere 
 and impartial good-will, will free us from all rancor to our ene- 
 mies, from too exclusive an attachment to our friends, and from 
 indifference to the rest of mankind. Prayers for all mankind, 
 offered up daily to Him who is the universal parent of mankind, 
 are benevolence, as well as devotion, put in practice every day. 
 
 But the special benefits of public worship may be stated more 
 particularly. 1. It does not seem possible to maintain, in a 
 community, any practical knowledge of God, and the practical 
 ascendency of Christian principles, without a stated public ser- 
 vice. This seems so obvious as scarcely to require either argu- 
 ment or illustration. Even where public religious service is 
 constantly maintained, and the Gospel is preached in its purity 
 and power, many live in disregard of God and the obligations of 
 religion, and scoff* at all divine things. Much more would this 
 be the case, if religion sought the shades, and entirely immured 
 itself, like a recluse, in the closet. In such a state of things, 
 open infidelity and impiety would sweep over the land, like the 
 pestilence which destroyeth at noonday. It is not more cer- 
 tain that night succeeds to day, than that the want of stated pub- 
 lic divine service, or the general neglect and contempt of such 
 service, must end in general irreverence of the Deity, and that to 
 this irreverence of the Deity must succeed universal dissolute- 
 ness of morals, and all the overflowings of ungodliness. 
 
 " Religion is the presiding and genial influence over every 
 system of morals." * Every man capable of reflection must be 
 convinced, that, if public worship were once discontinued, a uni- 
 versal forgetfulness would ensue of that God, whom to remember 
 is the highest security and the most effectual preservative against 
 
 * Mr. Clay's Speech in the U. S. Senate, 26th December, 1833. 
 
84 OUR RELATION TO THE DEITY. [Part I. 
 
 vice ; and that the bulk of mankind would soon degenerate into 
 mere savages and barbarians, if there were not stated days to 
 call them off from the common business of life, to attend to the 
 all-important business of securing their salvation. As well may 
 we expect law and order to maintain their influence in the land, 
 without tribunals to declare, and a magistracy to execute the law, 
 as to expect that religion will flourish or even exist, without a 
 stated public celebration of its services and ordinances. 
 
 2. Again ; the moral and religious instruction gained by an ha- 
 bitual attendance on public worship, is beyond measure valuable, 
 especially to those who have small opportunities of gaining in- 
 struction elsewhere. To this more than to any other cause it is 
 owing, that, in Christian countries, some degree of intelligence 
 is diffused among all orders of men. No man born in a Chris- 
 tian country needs to live and die without adequate instruction 
 in whatever pertains to virtue and godliness. 
 
 3. Moreover, the habitual assembling of men of every variety 
 of rank, fortune, and education, in the same edifice, to join in a 
 common religious service, has a sensible tendency to unite man- 
 kind in the bonds of a common fellowship, to cherish and enlarge 
 the generous affections, and, by contemplating their common re- 
 lation to the Governor of all things, to remind them of the natu- 
 ral equality of the human species, and thereby to promote hu- 
 mility and condescension in the more wealthy, the more learned, 
 and the more honorable ; and to inspire the humbler ranks 
 with a sense of their rights and with some degree of self-respect. 
 Office, birth, knowledge, wealth, and other distinctions known 
 and acknowledged among men, are recognised by Scripture ; 
 and corresponding duties are enjoined on those who enjoy these 
 advantages and honors. We are to render their dues to all ; 
 tribute to whom tribute is due ; custom to whom custom ; fear 
 to whom fear ; honor to whom honor.* 
 
 These distinctions, too, are sanctioned by Divine Providence 
 as a part of the system of human affairs ; no community has 
 existed without them, they seem inevitable ; and, if accom- 
 panied by a proper spirit, are conducive to the welfare of 
 
 * Rom. xiii. 7 ; Matt. xxii. 21. 
 
Chap. III.] DUTY OF WORSHIPPING GOD. 85 
 
 mankind. But they are usually carried too far, and valued too 
 much, by those who enjoy them ; and the spirit, which they tend 
 to nourish, estranges and alienates brethren of the same great 
 family from each other, by causing discontent, distrust, jealousy, 
 and envy. It is well, indeed, if they do not rouse the fiercer pas- 
 sions of hatred, malice, and revenge. The magistrate feels that 
 he represents the state, and infers from thence, that the official 
 dignity, with which his person is clothed, must not be defiled by 
 too much intercourse with the common people. Pride of birth 
 must not be soiled by the touch of any thing homebred and 
 ignoble. Learning cannot condescend to hold communion with 
 ignorance, and wealth looks down with insolence upon the 
 poor, the unfortunate, and the depressed. They move in dis- 
 tinct and exclusive circles, studiously assorted on the ground 
 of these distinctions, and their almost inevitable effect is, to 
 impair, if not to destroy the good feeling which ought to unite 
 all mankind by the bonds of a mutual sympathy and interest. If, 
 at any time, the poor man is seen at the tribunal of the magis- 
 trate, it is probably because he is dragged there to answer to the 
 suit or prosecution of some rich and fortunate oppressor. If he 
 visits the palaces of aristocratic pride, it is not to partake of 
 their enjoyments, — these are reserved for guests made of like 
 clay with their proprietors. 
 
 " Materia nostra constare, paribusque elementis." * 
 
 If he enters the mansions of the rich and the halls of the 
 learned, he still finds that he is not permitted to participate in 
 the treasures which they contain. 
 
 4. The church is the only place, in which the various classes 
 of mankind meet each other on any thing like equal terms. In 
 the house of God, the exclusive spirit, nourished by the arti- 
 ficial distinctions of human pride and power, stands rebuked 
 before the immeasurable distance, by which the highest of 
 mortals is separated from the throne of the Almighty. Men 
 are addressed there, not according to the wealth they have ac- 
 quired, or the other distinctions by which they are known, but 
 as alike the sinful children of a common parent, having similar 
 
 * Juvenal, Sat. XIV. 17. 
 
86 OUR RELATION TO THE DEITY. [Part I. 
 
 wants and desires, and alike standing in need of the great salva- 
 tion. Men are there reminded, most impressively, of the brief 
 continuance and comparative insignificance of the distinctions, 
 which they so earnesdy covet, and so inordinately prize. The 
 solemn lesson is there forced upon their minds, that, whatever 
 .accidental distinctions they may win, they have all commenced 
 life, and must all finish it, on the same terms. It is emphatically 
 there, that, as the wisest of men says, " the rich and the poor 
 meet together, the Lord is the Maker of them all."* 
 
 By thus habitually joining in the stated solemnities of a com- 
 mon religious service, the pride of purse, of knowledge, of sta- 
 tion, of ancestry, and of personal accomplishments, is laid in the 
 dust of humiliation before God ; the estrangement and alienation 
 in which the different classes of mankind are accustomed to live, 
 are diminished ; they come to look upon each other with more 
 kindly feelings ; and the decaying sympathies of a common origin 
 and a common destiny, and the same ultimate hopes and pros- 
 pects beyond the grave, are revived, strengthened, and saved 
 from extinction. It does not come within the author's province, 
 to advert to the peculiar spiritual blessings, which flow from an 
 attendance on public worship, as his aim is to treat of moral 
 philosophy distinct from theology. To this last science, the 
 part of Divine worship, which consists in the administration of 
 the sacraments, seems exclusively to belong. 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 THE OBSERVANCE OF SUNDAY. 
 
 The important moral influences of the private and public 
 worship of God, make the observance of Sunday a matter of 
 great moment in the view of the moral philosopher. In treating 
 this part of the subject, I shall, 1. Review the early history of 
 the Jewish Sabbath, 2. Inquire whether the institution known 
 
 * Proverbs xxii. 2. 
 
Chap. IV.] OBSERVANCE OF SUJNDAY. 87 
 
 originally by the name of the Sabbath, and in later times, by the 
 name of Sunday, was designed, save the mere change of the 
 day, to be the same, and to be of perpetual obligation. 3. In- 
 quire what are the duties which constitute a suitable observance 
 of Sunday. 
 
 1. It is not difficult to trace the history of the Jewish Sabbath, 
 as most of it is contained in the Old and New Testaments. The 
 sacred historian, after recounting the several acts of creation on 
 six successive days, proceeds, — " Thus the heavens and the 
 earth were finished, and all the host of them. And, on the seventh 
 day, God ended his work which he had made ; and he rested on 
 the seventh day from all his work which he had made. And God 
 blessed the seventh day and sanctified it." # Blessing and sancti- 
 fication, as applied to a day, can have no other meaning, than that 
 the day was to be made instrumental in conferring blessings, and 
 was to be appropriated to sacred purposes ; and the rest, ascribed 
 to the Almighty, can intend no more than that he then completed 
 the work of creation. 
 
 No sooner was this glorious work accomplished, a work which 
 Infinite Wisdom pronounced very good, than the Almighty Au- 
 thor decreed that the seventh day, the first that had witnessed 
 the fair and perfect creation, should be consecrated to his service, 
 and become a peculiar source of blessings. The Sabbath was 
 set apart at the creation; " it was, therefore, made for man,"f 
 that is, for mankind universally, and not for the Hebrews only. 
 
 The patriarchs led the Nomadic life, and the patriarchal histo- 
 ry is very brief; — still, it is not without traces that they were 
 mindful to keep the Sabbath day holy. \ The passages referred 
 to, show, that the week was, with them, a well-known and familiar 
 way of computing time. Again, it is said,§ that Abraham obey- 
 ed the voice of the Lord, and kept his charge, his command- 
 ments, his statutes, and his laws. It is not easy to believe that 
 these did not include the observance of the Sabbath. The uni- 
 versality of the week, can only be accounted for, from the Sab- 
 bath having been set apart at the creation, and observed by the 
 
 * Gen. ii. 1-3. t Mark ii. 27. 
 
 t Gen. viii. 10, 12; xxix. 27-28. § Gen. xxvi. 5. 
 
88 OUR RELATION TO THE DEITY. [Part I. 
 
 patriarchs, from whom all the nations of the earth are descended. 
 " We find from time immemorial," says the learned Goguet, 
 cc the use of this period among all nations, and without any varia- 
 tion in the form of it. The Israelites, Assyrians, Egyptians, In- 
 dians, Arabians, and in a word, all the nations of the east, have, in 
 all ages, made use of a week of seven days." * Another author of 
 equal distinction says, u The period of seven days, by far the most 
 permanent division of time, and the most ancient monument of 
 astronomical knowledge, was used by the Brahmins in India with 
 the same denominations employed by us, and was alike found in 
 the calendars of the Jews, Egyptians, Arabs, and Assyrians ; it 
 has survived the fall of empires, and has existed among all suc- 
 cessive generations, a proof of their common origin." f 
 
 During the long residence of the Hebrews in Egypt, in a state 
 of rigorous servitude, it may well be supposed that the Sabbath 
 was not much observed, and well-nigh forgotten. Still, after their 
 deliverance from Egypt, the Sabbath was observed by them, 
 before their arrival at Mount Sinai, and Moses evidently refers to 
 it as an institution rather neglected by them, than unknown to 
 them. \ In the Fourth Commandment, the term Sabbath is used 
 without explanation as one well known. Moreover, when it is 
 said, at the end of this commandment, that the Lord blessed the 
 seventh day and hallowed it, the reference seems most manifestly 
 to be to the original setting apart of the same day at the end of 
 the creation. My purpose does not require me to trace the 
 history of the Jewish Sabbath any further. 
 
 2. Was the institution, known originally by the name of the 
 Sabbath, and in later times by the name of Sunday, designed, 
 save the mere change of the day, to be the same, and to be of 
 perpetual obligation ? A brief discussion and comparison will 
 set this part of the subject in a very clear light. A distinction, 
 which the sacred writers have been at pains to mark and insist 
 on, is drawn between the great body of the Mosaic law and the 
 
 * Origin of Laws, Vol. I. Book 3, Chap. 2. 
 
 t Mrs. Somerville, Mechanism of the Heavens, Prel. Dis. p. 85. — See also 
 Dr. D wight on the Fourth Commandment, in his Theology, and Mr. Jay's 
 " Prize Essay," pp. 10 - 13. 
 
 \ Exodus xvi. 
 
Chap. IV.] OBSERVANCE OF SUNDAY. 89 
 
 ten commandments ; of which the injunction to keep the Sabbath- 
 day holy, is one. This distinction is seen in the origin of the 
 ten commandments, and in the manner in which they are recog- 
 nised in the New Testament, as well as in their intrinsic value. 
 The greater part of the Mosaic law consists of ceremonial 
 observances, transitory in their nature, and manifestly designed 
 to pass away ; the ten commandments make a part of fixed and 
 unchangeable truth, destined to survive to the end of time, and to 
 perish only when all things else shall perish. It is in vain to 
 attempt to separate, as has sometimes been done,* the command- 
 ment respecting the Sabbath from the other nine, promulgated, 
 as it was, under like circumstances with them, and recognised by 
 the same authority. 
 
 The origin of the commandments is worthy of their impor- 
 tance, in the code of eternal truth. The circumstances were of 
 the most imposing kind. The Hebrews, just rescued by the arm 
 of Omnipotence from an oppressive servitude, were encamped 
 at the foot of Mount Sinai ; they had been led by a pillar of 
 cloud by day and a pillar of fire by night, and their subsistence in 
 the midst of a dreary desert had been miraculous. Three days' 
 notice was given by Moses, that u the Lord would come down 
 in the sight of all the people upon Mount Sinai " ; and in the 
 mean time, they were required specially to sanctify themselves. 
 On the morning of the third day, there was a thick cloud upon 
 the mountain, with thunders and lightnings ? and the Lord de- 
 scended upon Mount Sinai in fire, and the smoke thereof as- 
 cended as the smoke of a furnace, and the whole mount quaked 
 greatly. The majestic scene was heightened, too, by the declara- 
 tion, that, if either man or beast presumed to touch the mount, 
 thus sanctified by the presence of the Almighty, he should surely 
 be put to death. Then, amid thunders and lightnings and smoke, 
 the ten commandments were proclaimed by the voice of the 
 Almighty. 
 
 The material, moreover, on which the ten commandments 
 were written, the immediate author (God himself) of the writing, 
 and the means used to preserve them, were worthy of the sacred 
 
 * Paley's Moral and Political Philosophy, p. 262. 
 
 12 
 
90 OUR RELATION TO THE DEITY. [Part I. 
 
 and sublime scene in which they originated, and serve further to 
 distinguish them from the ordinary laws of the Mosaic code, 
 which were communicated without any remarkable circumstances 
 attending them. Moses ascended the mountain, and the ten 
 commandments were delivered to him, written upon two tables of 
 stone, by the finger of the Almighty. When these tables had 
 been broken, the writing was renewed upon new tables by the 
 same Almighty hand. For their preservation, an ark was made 
 by divine direction, of immense value, * covered inside and out- 
 side with gold. The lid, denominated the mercy-seat, was of 
 gold, upon which were placed two golden cherubims, overshad- 
 owing it with their wings. By divine command, an apartment, 
 lined with gold, was set apart in the tabernacle to receive the 
 ark, and was named the Holy of Holies. A similar apartment 
 was appropriated to the same purpose in the temple, and of unex- 
 ampled magnificence. Five hundred years after the ark was 
 made, it was removed into the temple, and it then contained, as 
 we are informed, nothing but the two original tables of stone ; 
 and these tables probably remained four hundred years more, 
 when the temple was destroyed, f 
 
 Besides these circumstances, so manifestly distinguishing the 
 ten commandments from the body of the Mosaic laws, others still 
 may be noticed. Most of the Jewish laws were suited exclu- 
 sively to the people to whom they were given, and are wholly 
 unsuited to other nations and countries ; but every one of the ten 
 commandments may be observed by every nation upon the face 
 of the earth. Most of the precepts of the Mosaic code, too, are 
 of a ceremonial, and not of a moral kind, — they do not pertain 
 at all to morals ; but the commands of the Decalogue are directly 
 conducive to the peace, purity, and happiness of all who respect 
 them ; and a general obedience to several of them is indispensa- 
 ble to the very existence of civil society. The tendency and 
 effect, also, of the Mosaic law, was to keep the Hebrews distinct 
 from all other nations, and these ten commandments were of 
 course binding on them as a part of their law ; yet not one 6f 
 
 * Prideaux says, at the expense of £4,320,000 sterling. 
 f Exodus xix. 31, 32,34, 
 
Chap. IV.] OBSERVANCE OF SUNDAY. 91 
 
 them belonged to that system of positive precepts, which were 
 designed to draw a line between them and the rest of mankind, 
 nor to that system of types and shadows, which anticipated the 
 coming of the Messiah. 
 
 Moreover, into the chamber which contained the ark made to 
 preserve the two tables of stone, no one but the high priest was 
 permitted to enter, and he only once a year, for the purpose of 
 sprinkling blood upon the mercy-seat. On the supposition, that 
 the ten commandments were only an ordinary part of the Mo- 
 saic law, it is not easy to understand the significancy of this rite, 
 since sacrifices were offered morning and evening for the sins of 
 the Jewish people. But when we consider the ten command- 
 ments as constituting the moral law of Jehovah, binding upon all 
 the descendants of Adam during all time, and broken by them 
 all, we at once perceive, in the blood sprinkled upon the mercy- 
 seat, an emphatic type of that blood, which was afterwards shed 
 for the sins of the whole world. When, therefore, we consider 
 that the commandments, after having been proclaimed by the 
 voice of God himself, under circumstances of unparalleled awe 
 and grandeur, were twice engraven by his finger upon tables of 
 stone, — that these tables were, by divine command, placed in a 
 costly ark, and that deposited in a magnificent chamber con- 
 structed for the express purpose of receiving it, — that these 
 tables were perpetually overshadowed by a miraculous emblem 
 of the divine presence, — that the commandments are suited 
 equally to all ages, nations, and conditions, and are preeminently 
 conducive to the universal welfare of mankind ; — the conclusion 
 cannot well be resisted, that they are all, (of which the command 
 respecting the Sabbath is one,) of perpetual obligation, and that 
 " the Sabbath was thus made for man " universally.* Let us 
 see, if they are not, in like manner, recognised as of perpetual 
 obligation in the New Testament. 
 
 In his sermon on the Mount, our Saviour used this decisive 
 language ; — ■ " Think not that I am come to destroy the law or 
 the^prophets ; I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For, 
 verily I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one 
 
 * Mark ii. 27. 
 
92 OUR RELATION TO THE DEITY. [Part I. 
 
 tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Who- 
 soever, therefore, shall break one of these least commandments, 
 and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the king- 
 dom of heaven ; but whosoever shall do and teach them, shall 
 be called great in the kingdom of heaven." * Now it can scarcely 
 admit of doubt, that the law here referred to, which was to stand 
 fast for ever, is the law of the ten commandments; and, if so, 
 the perpetual obligation of the Sabbath is fully established. It 
 is incredible, that the strong language of our Saviour was intend- 
 ed to refer to the ceremonial law, called by St. Paul u the yoke 
 of bondage," and in regard to the passing aivay of which, he 
 exhorts Christians to " stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ 
 hath made them free." f Besides, as if to show, that the law and 
 commandments of which he was speaking, were distinct from the 
 ceremonial law, he proceeded to assure his audience, that, unless 
 their righteousness exceeded that of the Scribes and Pharisees, 
 who were extremely exact in their observance of the Jewish 
 ritual, (the ceremonial law,) they should in no case enter into the 
 kingdom of heaven ; and it merits notice, that, throughout the 
 whole sermon, our Saviour dwells on the importance of the mor- 
 al virtues, and comments upon several precepts of the Decalogue, 
 but in no instance touches upon the obligation of the ceremo- 
 nial law. 
 
 If we understand him, therefore, as referring to the moral 
 law, every difficulty and apparent contradiction immediately van- 
 ishes. Far from abolishing this law, he fulfilled it by his own 
 perfect obedience ; and his assertions respecting its continued 
 obligation are in entire consistency with the doctrines of his 
 own inspired apostles. The law, therefore, which was to be 
 perpetual, and of which not one of the least commandments 
 might be violated by any man with impunity, was no other than 
 the Decalogue, — that law which was uttered by the voice, and 
 written by the finger of God, over which the symbol of the 
 divine presence had rested for ages in the Holy of Holies. 
 
 If this argument is supposed to need confirmation, it may be 
 found by consulting those passages of the New Testament, in 
 
 * Matt. v. 18, 19. t Gal. v. 1. 
 
Chap. IV.] OBSERVANCE OF SUNDAY. 93 
 
 which the ten commandments are referred to as being still in 
 force.* In all these various recognitions of the continued obli- 
 gation of the ten commandments under the Christian dispensa- 
 tion, no intimation is given that the fourth, pertaining to the 
 Sabbath, is less binding than either of the other nine. Finally, 
 Christ himself vindicated the Sabbath from the traditional super- 
 stition of the Pharisees, explained its nature, and showed, that, as 
 it was designed for the benefit of mankind, it did not prohibit 
 works of necessity and mercy. f The divine origin and perpet- 
 ual obligation of the Sabbath, then, do not seem to admit of fur- 
 ther question. And this conclusion, moreover, gives us to un- 
 derstand why no positive command to keep the Sabbath holy, is 
 found in the New Testament. Such a command would have 
 been superfluous.^ 
 
 The institution of the Sabbath consists of two parts ; — the 
 rest which it enjoins on one day out of every seven, — and the 
 particular day of the seven which shall be appropriated to this 
 sacred rest. The former is the essential part of the institution ; 
 the latter, if not incidental, is manifestly less important, cer- 
 tainly not essential. The former has never been changed ; 
 the latter, from commemorating the finishing of the creation, has 
 been changed to the day commemorative of the resurrection of 
 the Saviour, the closing scene in the work of man's redemption, 
 and the pledge and earnest of our own resurrection. § 
 
 The Sabbath was made for man universally ; — Christ de- 
 clared himself to be " Lord of the Sabbath " ; that is, he claimed 
 authority over the day. A change in the day is no more than 
 a change in the order of the successive days ; — ■ the original day 
 of the Sabbath was commemorative of the finishing of creation ; 
 the Christian Sabbath (Sunday) || is commemorative of a still 
 
 * Mark x. 19 ; Luke xviii. 20 ; Rom. xiii. 9 ; Eph. vi. 2; James ii. 10, 11. 
 
 t See Mark ii. 23 -28 ; Luke xiii. 15 ; xiv. 5. 
 
 t The argumentative part of this chapter is very much indebted to a Prize 
 Essay, written by William Jay, Esq., and printed at Albany, in 3827. 
 
 § 1 Cor. xv. 12-17. 
 
 The day specially devoted throughout Christendom to rest, devotion, and 
 moral and religious improvement, is known by several names among Christians, 
 — as the Lord's day (dies Dominica) , the first day of the week, the Sabbath, 
 the Christian Sabbath, and Sunday. I have determined to make use of the last 
 of these names, in this treatise, to designate the day, for the following reasons. 
 
94 OUR RELATION TO THE DEITY. [Part 1. 
 
 greater event, the consummation of the work of man's redemp- 
 tion. The change in the day could not, from the nature of the 
 case, be made, until the event had occurred which it was to 
 commemorate. We may well conclude, moreover, that our 
 
 1. The term Sunday is more generally used by Christians to designate the 
 day than any other, and uniformity in this respect is a matter of considerable 
 convenience, and therefore importance. It is used by the Roman Catholic 
 Church, by the established Church of England, by the Protestant Episcopal 
 Church in the United States, and by the Lutheran Church in the United 
 States and in Germany. A most respectable Methodist clergyman informs 
 me, that this term is most generally used by the numerous denomination 
 to which he belongs. The use of the other terms prevails somewhat ex- 
 tensively among Christians of other denominations among us. And yet, 
 from the phrase " American Sunday School Union " in this country, which 
 is chiefly under the direction of Presbyterians and Congregationalists, but is 
 intended to unite all denominations in advancing its objects, and from other 
 facts and circumstances known to me, I am disposed to conclude, that Sunday 
 is more generally used, even by these numerous denominations, than either of 
 the other terms above mentioned. It is believed, that more than three fourths 
 of the entire population of the United States habitually use the term Sunday. 
 
 2. In examining the several terms from which a choice is to be made to de- 
 signate the Christian day of sacred rest, no term seems, on the whole, to be so 
 appropriate as Sunday. St. John calls it " the Lord's day " (Revelation, i. 10), 
 and this term is therefore very suitable and proper ; but it is not at present, if it 
 ever has been, much used. The phrase, " the first day of the week," is objec- 
 tionable, by reason of its inconvenient length. This reason applies, too, in 
 some degree, to the use of the phrase, " the Lord's day." The term Sabbath prop- 
 erly belongs to Judaism, and the tendency of using it is, to convey an erroneous 
 impression, and to confound Christianity too much with Judaism. Bishop White 
 says, " In the primitive church, the term ' Sabbatizing ' carried with it the re- 
 proach of a leaning to the abrogated observance of the law." (Lectures on the 
 Catechism, p. 65.) The phrase, " Christian Sabbath," applied by analogy to 
 the day, has no advantage over the term Sunday, and is less convenient from 
 its length. 
 
 3. It can be no just objection to the term Sunday, that it is of heathen origin, 
 as long, at least, as we continue to instruct our children in the classical (heath- 
 en) writers of antiquity. " The early Christians," says Bishop White again, 
 "conformed to the custom of their heathen neighbours, in the calling of the 
 days and the months." (Ibid.) In truth, it began to be used very early by the 
 primitive Christians. Justin Martyr, who lived at the close of the first and the 
 beginning of the second century, says, " On the day called Sunday, is an as- 
 sembly of all who live in the city or country, and the memoirs of the apostles 
 and the writings of the prophets are read. (Sermons on the Lord's Day, by 
 Daniel Wilson. London, 1831. p. 110.) 
 
 The term Sunday, then, has the considerable advantage of uniformity j it 
 conveys no erroneous impression ; it is easily pronounced ; no just objection 
 can be urged against its use ; and it has the sanction of primitive Christian 
 antiquity. 
 
Chap. IV.] OBSERVANCE OF SUNDAY. 95 
 
 Lord, during the interval between his resurrection and ascension, 
 instructed his apostles to make this change, and he certainly sanc- 
 tioned it by meeting with his disciples on two successive Sun- 
 days, and absenting himself during the intervening week ; and 
 again in the visible descent of the Holy Spirit on the same sa- 
 cred day. 
 
 3. The duties which constitute a suitable observance of Sunday. 
 Before proceeding to the particulars of which this branch of the 
 subject consists, it may be well to observe, that from the fact of 
 the institution being derived through Judaism, and made, by its 
 perpetual obligation, a part of Christianity, it does not result, 
 that the penalties attached by the Hebrews to the violation of it 
 are continued along with it. The penalties inflicted by the Mo- 
 saic law are not a part of the institution; they were only the 
 means of enforcing its observance ordained by Moses, and are 
 a part of the local policy which was discontinued at the advent 
 of the Messiah.* 
 
 It is observable, too, that no penalty is attached (in the Deca- 
 logue) to the violation of any one of the ten commandments ; 
 they are universally binding on the consciences of nations and 
 individuals, but each nation is left to compel their observance by 
 such penalties as it may deem fit, or by none at all. We of the 
 present day, are no more required to punish a violation of Sun- 
 day by death, as did the Hebrews, than we are, like them, to 
 punish imprecations on parents with the same penalty. f Respect 
 for parents and the observance of Sunday are alike binding on 
 the consciences of all men ; but our tribunals of justice do not 
 punish disobedience to parents, and our municipal laws enforcing 
 the observance (in twenty-three of our States) of Sunday have 
 fallen into very general neglect. If any specific penal sanctions 
 had been made a part of the ten commandments, they must have 
 been unfitted, by that circumstance, to be the supreme moral law, 
 claiming the obedience of all men through all time ; because 
 such penalties, though they might have been very suitable to the 
 circumstances of one nation, might also have been very unsuit- 
 able to those of another. Neither are all the duties of the 
 
 * Exod. xxxi. 14, 15. t Lev. xx. 9; Deut. xxvii. 16. 
 
96 OUR RELATION TO THE DEITY. [Part 1. 
 
 Hebrew Sabbath transferred to the Christian Sunday.* With 
 these few explanatory remarks I proceed. 
 
 (1.) The first and most obvious duty appropriate to Sunday 
 is a cessation from labor. This is a part of the fourth command- 
 ment, is of perpetual obligation, and has no connexion with the 
 local and temporary Hebrew policy. The Sunday is a great 
 and precious privilege. By this institution, those who labor with 
 their hands are rescued from the severities and hardships of 
 unremitting toil ; — and those whose labor is chiefly of the under- 
 standing find in it a season of refreshment and renovation of 
 strength and energy, of which they stand in equal need with those 
 whose labor is performed by the hands. 
 
 Works of necessity and mercy, however, and the labor of 
 attending and performing divine service, are recognised by the 
 Saviour himself as suitable to the Jewish Sabbath, f and they are 
 equally so to the Christian Sunday. The relief of Sunday to 
 the laboring classes of mankind contributes greatly to the com- 
 fort and happiness of their lives, both as it refreshes them for 
 the time, and as it lightens their six days' labor, by the prospect 
 of a day of rest always before them. This could not be said of 
 casual indulgences of leisure and rest, even if they occurred more 
 frequently than Sunday. It is matter of experience, also, that 
 days of relaxation which occur seldom and unexpectedly, being 
 unprovided when they do come, with any duty or employment, 
 and the manner of spending them being regulated by no public 
 standard of propriety and established usage, they are usually con- 
 sumed in sloth, or in rude, perhaps criminal diversions, or, still 
 worse, in scenes of riot and intemperance. The Sunday is a 
 day of rest and refreshment to the body and to the mind, but not 
 a day of sloth and indulgence. The remark, moreover, must 
 not be omitted, that it gives a day of rest and refreshment to the 
 laboring animals, as well as to laboring man. Thus "the Lord 
 is good to all, and his tender mercies are over all the works of 
 his hands."| 
 
 (2.) But the Sunday includes much more than cessation from 
 
 s 
 
 Levit. xxiii. 8, 42, &c. t Mark ii. 23 -28 ; Mat. xii. 1 - 14. 
 
 t Paley's Moral and Political Philosophy, p. 253. 
 
Chap. IV.] OBSERVANCE OF SUNDAY. 97 
 
 labor, and rest, and refreshment of the body and mind. We are 
 required to keep it holy, that is, to set it apart from a common to 
 a special and sacred use. This requires the appropriation of it to 
 an attendance on public worship, and includes the more general 
 duty, of employing it in every suitable way, for the purpose of 
 moral and religious improvement. Religious assemblies under 
 the name of " holy convocations," * were accustomed to be held 
 on the Hebrew Sabbath ; and we have full evidence, that a com- 
 pliance with the same custom was considered a personal and 
 universal duty on the Christian Sunday from the beginning, f 
 Besides attendance on public worship, reading, meditation, pri- 
 vate prayer, the instruction of children and servants, are the 
 appropriate and important duties of Sunday. The latter class of 
 persons, especially, must be instructed on this day, or they will, 
 too probably, receive no instruction at all. 
 
 (3.) The appropriation of a part of the Sunday to the elemen- 
 tary moral and religious instruction of children, especially poor 
 children, and of adults who stand in need of such instruction, 
 and are willing to receive it, may justly be regarded as one of 
 the greatest moral improvements of modern times. In Sunday 
 schools, — those humble seminaries of charitable education, — 
 many hundreds of thousands of children are nurtured in the ways 
 of righteousness, not a few of whom would otherwise have been 
 brought up in neglect, irreligion, and probably crime. These 
 nurseries of education, morals, and piety are founded on the 
 principle recommended by Solomon and sanctioned by all ex- 
 perience, — of training up the child in the way he should go, that, 
 when he is old, he may not depart from it. The experience of 
 all times demonstrates, that the character of the man is built on 
 the principles instilled into the mind of the child. In further- 
 ance of the original plan, too, the conductors of Sunday schools, 
 in this country, have very extensively instituted libraries of choice 
 books for the instruction of the young under their charge ; and 
 they meditate no less an enterprise, than the elementary moral 
 and religious education of the entire youthful population of the 
 
 * Exod. xii. 16; Levit. xxiii. 7, &c. 
 
 1 Heb. x. 25 ; John xx, 19, 26; Acts xx ; 6,7 , 1 Cor. xvL I, 2; Rev, i. 10 
 
 13 
 
98 OUR RELATION TO THE DEITY. [Part I. 
 
 United States, and the furnishing them universally, by libraries, 
 with facilities for reading, both on Sundays and other days, of 
 the most useful and attractive kind. The philanthropic mind is 
 filled with admiration when contemplating an enterprise so bene- 
 ficial and comprehensive. Besides, the good effect of Sunday 
 school instruction extends not only to the scholars actually 
 taught, but to the teachers, the parents, and even the ministers 
 and congregations in which they are organized and properly sus- 
 tained. In this way, by thus vastly augmenting the usefulness of 
 the day, a new and before unknown value has been given to the 
 institution of Sunday itself. 
 
PART SECOND. 
 
 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY, AND THE MOR- 
 AL DUTIES THENCE ARISING ; THAT IS, THE 
 DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. 
 
 It has sometimes been said, that u a Christian is of no coun- 
 try," that he ought to esteem all countries alike, and to have no 
 attachment to one country more than to another ; * but this sen- 
 timent will not bear examination when submitted to the test of 
 Scripture, any more than when brought to the bar of reason. 
 The Hebrew Scriptures abound with the most enthusiastic and 
 even exclusive sentiments of attachment, on the part of the au- 
 thors, for their native land, f In the New Testament, this enthu- 
 siasm and exclusiveness of attachment to country are not seen ; 
 still the sentiment and the duty of patriotism are fully recognised. 
 Our Saviour instructed his disciples to render unto Caesar all 
 things which Caesar might rightfully claim ; J that is, he instructed 
 them to comply with all the lawful ordinances of civil govern- 
 ment. While predicting the destruction of Jerusalem for its sins, 
 he still accompanied his prediction with the most pathetic lamen- 
 tations. § The benefits of his personal ministry, too, were con- 
 fined to his own countrymen, || and those, who were commission- 
 ed to preach his Gospel, were enjoined to make it known first 
 to the Jews and then to the Gentiles. IF St. Paul was especially 
 commissioned to preach the Gospel to the Gentiles ; still he 
 recognises his obligation to make it known first of all to his 
 countrymen. ** We are instructed u to make supplications, 
 prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings for kings, and all that 
 are in authority, that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all 
 
 * Soame Jenyns' Internal Evidences of Christianity, prop. 3. 
 
 t Psalm cxxxvii. 5-7. $ Mark xii. 13-17. § Mat. xxiii. 37. 
 
 || Mat. xv. 24. IT Mat. x. 5, 6. ** Rom. i. 13 - 16. 
 
100 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY [Part II. 
 
 godliness and honesty." This implies a cheerful and cordial 
 submission to the government under which we live, as distinct 
 from that of any other country. The truth is, Christianity 
 adapts itself to human institutions and to the relations of human 
 life as it finds them, and seeks to meliorate and improve all of 
 them, f 
 
 Christianity has made obedience to civil government impera- 
 tively binding on the conscience, and there is no duty in regard 
 to which it speaks in more decisive terms. u Submit yourselves 
 to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake ; whether it be to 
 the king, as supreme ; or unto governors, as unto them that are 
 sent by him for the punishment of evil-doers, and for the praise 
 of them that do well. For so is the will of God, that with well- 
 doing ye may put to silence the ignorance of foolish men ; as 
 free and not using your liberty for a cloak of maliciousness, but 
 as the servants of God. "J In Romans xiii. 1-7, St. Paul 
 enjoins obedience in terms yet more imperative. Still, au- 
 thoritatively as these passages speak, they do not inculcate the 
 unlimited obedience, much less the servile spirit, which has 
 sometimes been ascribed to them. § They make civil obedi- 
 ence a branch of Christian duty, instead of a mere submission to 
 superior force. The doctrine contained in them is applicable 
 both to individuals and to associations of individuals, combined 
 to accomplish any particular object. Every individual owes 
 prompt and cheerful obedience to the lawful authority of his 
 country. But he ow T es no obedience to civil government, in 
 any instance in which the consequence must be a violation of 
 his duty to God. Nor does he owe compliance in any instance 
 or degree, in which authority has not been given to the magis- 
 trate, by the State, to require it. These limitations require no 
 illustration. 
 
 But there is a great difference between an individual refusing 
 to comply with an ordinance of government, and an association 
 of individuals united to overthrow the existing government of a 
 
 * 1 Tim. ii. 1, 2. t See Gisborne's Inquiry, Vol. I. p. 109-124. 
 
 t 1 Pet. ii. 13- 16. 
 
 § See "The American Review," for 1811, Vol. I. p. 336. 
 
Part II] DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. 101 
 
 country by a revolution, and to establish another. It is in conse- 
 quence of the overwhelming evils of anarchy and revolution, that 
 the duty of civil obedience has been prescribed in so strong 
 language. Still no attempt is made to fix limits to an obe- 
 dience, to which, from the nature of the case, no well marked 
 limits can be assigned. All Christian duties are treated alike, 
 in this respect, in the New Testament. Thus the duty of 
 husbands and wives, of parents and children, of masters and 
 servants, are all prescribed, but no attempt is made to assign 
 the exact limits of these duties. 
 
 The right of revolution, or making forcible resistance to civil 
 government, cannot be ascertained by any precise boundaries ; — 
 it commences at the point where civil obedience ceases to be a 
 virtue. What this point is, those w r ho undertake a revolution 
 must of necessity judge for themselves, upon a view of all the 
 circumstances and under the weight of the most solemn respon- 
 sibility to God, their country, and mankind. In undertaking to 
 make forcible resistance to government, u the end should be 
 seen from the beginning ;" and to bear present evils while they 
 are tolerable, is preferable to rushing into a revolution, where the 
 evils are certain and very great, and the good in prospect must 
 always be, in a considerable degree, problematical. 
 
 u The speculative line of demarcation, where obedience 
 ought to end, and resistance must begin, is," says Mr. Burke, 
 " faint, obscure, and not easily definable. It is not a single act, 
 or a single event, which determines it. Governments must be 
 abused and deranged, indeed, before it can be thought of; and 
 the prospect of the future must be as bad as the experience of 
 the past. When things are in that lamentable condition, the 
 nature of the disease is to indicate the remedy, to those whom 
 nature has qualified to administer, in extremities, this critical, 
 ambiguous, bitter potion, to a distempered state. Times, and 
 occasions, and provocations will teach their own lessons. The 
 wise will determine from the gravity of the case, — the irritable, 
 from sensibility to oppression, — the high-minded, from disdain 
 and indignation at abused power in unworthy hands, — the brave 
 and bold, from the love of honorable danger, in a generous 
 
102 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY, [Part II. 
 
 cause ; — but, with or without right, a revolution will be the 
 very last resource of the thinking and the good." * 
 
 Our Declaration of Independence has marked the right and 
 duty of resistance with as much definiteness as seems practi- 
 cable. " Prudence will dictate," it says, " that governments long 
 established should not be changed for light and transient causes ; 
 but, when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing inva- 
 riably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them (a 
 people) under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their 
 duty to throw off such government and to provide new guards 
 for their future security." Is it not one of the characteristics 
 of the present day, to rush into revolutions with too little regard 
 to the circumstances and consequences ? f 
 
 The duties of patriotism may be ranged under seven divis- 
 ions. I. The moral duties of rulers of every grade. II. Du- 
 ties of citizens or subjects towards the civil magistrate. III. The 
 duty of exercising the elective franchise with integrity and dis- 
 cretion. IV. The duty of cultivating a patriotic spirit and the 
 patriotic virtues. V. The duty of citizens to keep themselves 
 well informed respecting public men and public measures. 
 VI. The duty of aiding in the defence of the country, and in 
 the administration of justice by serving on juries, giving testi- 
 mony on oath, &c. VII. Moral duties of the United States, 
 viewed as communities, towards each other. 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 MORAL DUTIES OF RULERS OF EVERY GRADE. 
 
 It is not within the province of ethics, to discuss the consti- 
 tutional, legal, or other official duties of public officers of any par- 
 ticular grade ; and, in doing so, the author would be going out of 
 his way ; but the moral duties of them all are so similar, that they 
 
 * Burke's Works, Vol. V. p. 73. London, 1803. 
 t Gisborne's Inquiry, Vol. I. p. 77 - 83, 97, 107. 
 
Chap. I.] DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. 103 
 
 may be treated under the same division. Nor is it within the 
 author's province to do more than advert to the personal qualifi- 
 cations, physical, intellectual, or moral, which the various public 
 officers may rightfully be expected to bring to the discharge of 
 the duties of their respective offices. His concern is with their 
 special moral duties, arising from the stations which they fill. 
 The public officers particlarly referred to, comprise the Presi- 
 dent of the United States, and the chief executive officers by 
 whom he is aided in the discharge of his high duties, the mem- 
 bers of both houses of Congress, the governors of the several 
 states and territories, the members of the state and territorial 
 legislatures, the judges of the national and state courts, the offi- 
 cers of the army and navy of the United States, and of the 
 militia of the several states. All these various officers make up 
 a mighty host ; and, however different may be the spheres of their 
 official duty, still they all occupy a common ground and sustain 
 a common relation to their country, from which spring moral 
 duties of the most important kind. Their power of influencing 
 the public happiness is great, in proportion as their stations are 
 elevated ; and their influence for good or for evil is felt through 
 all the ramifications of society. 
 
 The greatest evil by which a free government is beset and 
 endangered is, the excessive prevalence and extreme virulence 
 of faction and party spirit. This source of public danger is 
 great and threatening in proportion to the freedom of the govern- 
 ment of a country and the consequent fewness of the restraints 
 of law. Faction and party spirit have, in truth, been the bane 
 of all free governments. No one can read of the intrigues, 
 machinations, and exterminating violence of faction in the repub- 
 lics of ancient Greece, each party, as it gained the ascendency, 
 alternately wreaking its vengeance on the other, without being 
 filled with aversion and disgust. The history of the Roman 
 commonwealth and of the Italian republics of the middle ages, 
 are too well fraught with instruction of the same melancholy kind. 
 
 But we need not go back to ancient times, to be instructed in 
 the evils of faction and party violence. The sanguinary scenes 
 of the French Revolution, originating in, and consummated by, 
 the madness of party and faction, have furnished a lesson to all 
 
104 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY. [Part II. 
 
 mankind which ought never to be forgotten in all future time. 
 We ourselves have tasted enough of the bitterness of party strife, 
 to make us, if we are wise, patient under the voice of warning 
 and admonition. The characteristics, as well as the evils, of par- 
 ty are substantially the same at all times. 
 
 In transacting the business of life, it is constantly the duty of 
 one man to cooperate with, and concur in promoting, the meas- 
 ures of another, on the ground of an entire or substantial con- 
 currence of judgment ; but much more than this is required of 
 the man who enlists under the banners of partisanship. The 
 well-trained partisan must not permit himself to be embarrassed 
 by the trammels either of judgment or conscience. He must 
 not hesitate to affirm what he knows to be false, — to deny what 
 he knows to be true, — to approve what he is convinced is un- 
 wise, — and to encourage what he deems reprehensible. To 
 countenance thorough-going party spirit, is to justify and sanction 
 all this, — yea more, much more ; — it is to encourage factious 
 orators, bold declaimers, needy and profligate adventurers, to 
 join in combinations for the purpose of obtruding themselves 
 into all the offices of government, and, under the name and garb 
 of servants of the people, to impose on them chains too strong 
 to be broken. It is to exclude men from employments, not 
 because their characters are impeachable or doubtful ; not be- 
 cause their talents are inadequate or unknown ; but because they 
 were born in a particular part of the country, are suspected of 
 preferring measures to men, of an attachment to reason and the 
 public good, rather than to party watchwords and appellations, 
 and hesitate to promise implicit allegiance to the chief, and obe- 
 dience to every order of the reigning political confederacy. 
 
 These, as has before been said, are not the characteristics of 
 any particular party, but of all party when uncurbed by moral 
 principle ; and will be displayed in stronger or fainter colors, ac- 
 cording to the genius of the leaders and the circumstances of 
 the times. Their prevalence at any period, not only puts at 
 hazard the final welfare of the country, by dividing it into two 
 conflicting parts ; by perpetuating feuds, jealousies, and animos- 
 ities ; by threatening the annihilation of patriotism and public 
 
Chap. I.] DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. 105 
 
 spirit ; but tends continually to obscure the dignity, and destroy 
 the authority, of government itself. 
 
 When the chief magistrate of a nation permits this blighting 
 spirit to enter into the policy of his administration, much more 
 when he is himself instrumental in introducing it, when partisan- 
 ship alone is rewarded and merit discouraged, he flagrantly be- 
 trays the high trust with which the confidence of the nation has 
 invested him. On the other hand, when, rejecting all distinc- 
 tions not originating in personal merit, he is willing to confer the 
 honors and emoluments of the State upon any of the citizens 
 possessed of virtues and talents capable of advancing its welfare ; 
 it is difficult to say, whether he secures, so far as an upright line 
 of conduct can secure, more substantial advantages to his coun- 
 try, or more satisfaction, honor, and influence to himself. Roused 
 by his impartial call, public spirit revives in the remotest extrem- 
 ities of the land, prompting every class of citizens to whatever 
 exertions the general good may require. 
 
 After these observations, it is not difficult to understand, that 
 it is one of the highest moral duties of men invested with pub- 
 lic office, to guard themselves against the fatal venom of party 
 virulence, and, by discountenancing it in all over whom they have 
 any influence, to prevent it from infecting and desolating the 
 land. The demon of party is usually raised by the wand of a 
 very few ambitious individuals in a community ; and this, too, 
 with a view to their personal aggrandizement. How many, also, 
 have succeeded in raising this fierce demon from the shades, who 
 have not been equally successful in conjuring it down at their 
 bidding. Let the public man of whatever grade meet the spirit 
 of faction with a resolute sense of duty, — let no excitement of 
 passion, however craving for indulgence, let no temptation of im- 
 mediate interest, or alluring advantage in prospect, — no desire 
 of humbling a rival, supplanting a competitor, or crushing an 
 adversary, prevail on him to lend himself to the intrigues of fac- 
 tion and the clamor of party violence. The sword of party, 
 moreover, has more than a single edge ; and many a man has, in 
 the end, been cleft asunder by it in the midst, who has for a time 
 wielded it successfully. Situated as we are in this country, it 
 must ever be the fault of a very few men, clothed with high 
 14 
 
106 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY. [Part II. 
 
 public confidence, if the country is distracted, and its prospects 
 blighted, by the violence of faction and party. 
 
 The position in society, occupied by legislators and magistrates 
 invested with the higher functions of government, gives them 
 facilities, possessed by no other class of their countrymen, for 
 advancing the great interests of knowledge, good morals, educa- 
 tion, religion, and general humanity in their country, and even 
 in foreign countries. These facilities, capacities, and opportuni- 
 ties of usefulness, furnished by the official situations with which 
 the confidence of their country has clothed them, are a great 
 moral trust, for the rightful and beneficial administration of which 
 they are responsible. It is to no purpose to say, that these du- 
 ties are indefinite in their nature, and prescribed by no statute or 
 other written law. This is true, but the law of the land attempts 
 to prescribe only a very small part of our moral duties ; and we 
 cannot omit to use beneficially any of the facilities we may en- 
 joy, of doing good, without incurring the guilt of opportunities 
 neglected and capacities of usefulness unemployed. There are 
 sins of omission as well as of commission, — perhaps they are 
 not much less numerous or less aggravated ; and the principle is 
 unquestionably recognised and sanctioned by Christianity, that 
 every man is responsible for the beneficial use of whatever facili- 
 ties, capacities, and opportunities of usefulness he may enjoy.* 
 
 The talents, which we are forbidden to let remain unprofitable 
 in our hands, are our time, our wealth, our knowledge, our 
 health, our influence, either personal or official, and whatever 
 other powers, faculties, or opportunities were originally given us 
 by the Almighty, or whatever he has permitted and enabled us to 
 acquire, which can be turned to his glory, our own benefit, or 
 the welfare of mankind. It is impossible for me to give even a 
 general view of the facilities for doing good, furnished by the 
 various and multiplied official situations which exist in this coun- 
 try, much less to enter into their details. They can scarcely 
 fail to occur to any one, who is willing to avail himself of his 
 official situation to make himself as useful as possible ; and, if 
 brought to the notice of men of an opposite spirit, it could do 
 
 * Matt. xxv. 14-30; Luke xix. 12-17; Rom. xiv. 7,8. 
 
Chap. I.] DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. 107 
 
 no good. It is chiefly the spirit by which a man is influenced, 
 that makes him useful or otherwise. Our legislators, besides 
 procuring the repeal of laws having an evil tendency, are fur- 
 nished with all the extensive means of official usefulness within 
 the reach of legislative enactment and supervision. Knowledge, 
 education, good morals, and religion depend very considerably 
 for their advancement on legislative action. 
 
 It is made the constitutional duty of the President of the 
 United States, and of the governors of the several States, to 
 give information to the national and state legislatures of the con- 
 dition and prospects of the country within their respective juris- 
 dictions, to recommend measures for the suppression of evils, 
 the reformation of abuses, and the amelioration of the existing 
 state of things generally. These documents are communicated 
 annually, sometimes oftener ; legislation usually takes its tone 
 from what they contain ; and the number and character of the 
 subjects introduced into them depend entirely on executive dis- 
 cretion. What enviable facilities for doing good, do not these 
 documents furnish to the patriot statesman ? These instruments 
 have not often contained any thing injurious to the great moral 
 interests of the community ; — and, if we have sometimes had 
 just occasion to complain of their having too little bearing on 
 these all-important interests, still it is but justice to admit, that 
 their distinguished authors have availed themselves in a very com- 
 mendable degree of their high official situations, to advance edu- 
 cation, science, morals, and Christianity. 
 
 Several of our state executives have taken a most praise- 
 worthy stand in favor of literary, moral, and religious education, 
 of associations for the advancement of science, and against gam- 
 ing, lotteries, intemperance in drinking, and other nuisances of 
 the moral kind. The navy of the United States, under instruc- 
 tions from the President, has sometimes, on its excursions to 
 distant quarters of the world, been employed to obtain valuable 
 information, to be turned to useful purposes at home. The offi- 
 cers of the army, too, scattered as they are through the Union 
 and its territories, have sometimes been instructed to make them- 
 selves useful to their countrymen in the same way. Our foreign 
 ministers and consuls, moreover, have occasionally employed 
 
108 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY. [Part II. 
 
 their leisure and peculiar facilities to the same end. While we 
 may express gratification, that so much has been accomplished, 
 it is still to be regretted, that the rare and very peculiar oppor- 
 tunities of this kind, which have been perpetually occuring during 
 the last half-century, have not been yet more productive of good. 
 Objects of this kind are worthy of the careful attention and 
 patriotic regard of all, who occupy stations of high official trust 
 and responsibility. 
 
 But a moral duty of still higher importance, and specially ap- 
 pertaining to those who are invested with high public functions, 
 consists in their private influence, and the personal example which 
 they set from day to day, in their intercourse with the private 
 citizens. The dignity of the office, by an easy transition, passes 
 over to him who fills it ; and there is a natural propensity in the 
 human mind to adopt the sentiments and imitate the conduct of 
 those who are invested with authority. The example of the 
 rulers of a country, like the impulse of a stone on the yielding 
 surface of a lake, diffuses their influence around in concentric 
 and gradually enlarging circles, to an extent which the eye can 
 neither trace nor limit. The power which they possess of 
 checking or accelerating the progress of extravagance, luxury, 
 and vice, and of encouraging or discountenancing useful plans 
 and institutions for the advancement of morals, the improvement 
 of the people, and the increase of industry, by their personal 
 aid, and still more by the general credit and esteem which their 
 encouragement will afford, is not confined to those who are eye- 
 witnesses of their daily life and conversation. Their exam- 
 ple diffuses its effects not merely among those who are admitted 
 to their tables and their society, but is propagated from one knot 
 of imitators to another, until it spreads its influence through the 
 country far and wide, and reaches and affects its most obscure 
 corners. It is true, that the law is supreme in our system, and 
 that it is so, is the chief glory of our institutions ; — still, not- 
 withstanding this, enough of influence will always remain to those 
 who are charged with the administration of the law, to render 
 their sentiments, and more especially their example, highly inju- 
 rious or beneficial to the community. The evil example of a 
 very few men in high situations, may deluge an entire country 
 
€hap. I.] DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM 109 
 
 with infidelity and licentiousness. How often has it occurred in 
 the history of the world, that the licentious principles and open 
 immoralities of a profligate court have infected an entire nation 
 with the virulence of their poison ? The profligate Charles the 
 Second, of Great Britain, infected every rank and order of socie- 
 ty in the kingdom, with the moral poison which his sentiments 
 and example infused. 
 
 There is at least one vice, which official persons, if they could 
 be brought to combine their influence, might bring into such dis- 
 repute, as to expel it from society. I refer to duelling, which 
 depends entirely for its reputation on the countenance given it 
 by the distinguished and the influential. The good example of 
 the same class of men in respect to gaming, intemperance in 
 drinking, luxury, and extravagance of every kind, if less com- 
 pletely successful, still could not fail to be highly effective and 
 salutary. The opposite example descends from them to men in 
 more humble circumstances of life, until, like a flood, it desolates 
 every village and neighbourhood with the overwhelming mischief 
 and ruin which march in its train. In the most elective gov- 
 ernment, not all offices are elective, many are rilled by appoint- 
 ment ; and it is among the most solemn of the responsibilities of 
 those who hold the appointing power, to select, for official trust, 
 those among the citizens, who are most distinguished for industry, 
 for understanding, for public spirit and for integrity, as well as to 
 fill each department of the public service with men whose talents 
 are best suited to its peculiar business, and to unite in each 
 public officer, in the greatest practicable measure, purity of pri- 
 vate morals with the lustre of official talents.* 
 
 * See Gisborne's Inquiry, Vol. I. p. 58, &c. 
 
110 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY. [Part II 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 DUTIES OF THE CITIZENS TOWARDS THE CIVIL MAGISTRATE. 
 
 Next to the moral duties of civil governors and magistrates 
 arising from their official situation, come those which are due 
 from the citizens towards those who are invested with any degree 
 of official trust. That the New Testament ranks this among the 
 most important of Christian duties, may be fairly inferred from 
 the strong language which it is accustomed to employ. We are 
 not only " to fear God, but to honor the king" ; * which term is 
 here used to represent civil government and magistracy of every 
 kind. Again, St. Peter says, f " Submit yourselves, for the 
 Lord's sake, to every ordinance of man ; " that is, to every 
 person whom men have invested with any degree of lawful au- 
 thority over you, — " whether it be to the king, as supreme, or 
 unto governors," that is, all subordinate magistrates, "as unto 
 them that are sent by him for the punishment of evil-doers, and 
 the praise of them that do well." 
 
 They who are thus ordained by men to perform the func- 
 tions of governors, are to be obeyed for conscience'' sake; and 
 are, therefore, said by St. Paul " to be ordained of God." 
 " There is no power but of God," continues he ; every form 
 of lawful government and magistracy is sanctioned by the Al- 
 mighty. " The powers that be are ordained of God," — even 
 the idolatrous and persecuting Roman government had authority 
 from God to exact obedience from those to whom St. Paul 
 wrote ; whence he infers, that "whosoever resisteth the power," 
 whoever refuses just obedience to his lawful rulers, " resisteth 
 the ordinance of God, and they that resist shall receive to them- 
 selves condemnation." After some further pertinent instructions, 
 he concludes with this comprehensive admonition, — "Render 
 therefore to all," i. e. to each magistrate in his proper depart- 
 
 * 1 Peter ii. 17. t 1 Peter ii. 13. 
 
Chap. II.] DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. Ill 
 
 merit, " their dues ; tribute to whom tribute is due ; custom to 
 whom custom ; fear to whom fear ; honor to whom honor." * 
 
 Civil governors have an arduous, responsible, and burthensome 
 duty to perform ; the public interest and safety are committed to 
 their hands ; and every good citizen must feel a special interest in 
 them, and in the successful administration of their trust. To this 
 end, they are entitled, from the citizens, to a fair, candid, and 
 even favorable construction and representation of their senti- 
 ments, personal conduct, and official measures. They are the 
 agents to whom the entire body of the citizens stand in the rela- 
 tion of principal ; and a willingness to misrepresent and embarrass 
 their measures is a willingness to misrepresent and embarrass 
 those, who have been commissioned to act for their benefit, in 
 a situation in which they cannot act for themselves. 
 
 Even in cases, where their conduct and their measures are of 
 doubtful character and tendency, they are entitled to have the 
 doubt given in their favor. To assail them with indiscriminate 
 abuse, with virulent invective and bitter denunciation, except for 
 unquestionable reasons, is most unjust, unpatriotic, and reprehen- 
 sible. St. Peter refers, in strong terms of disapproval, to those 
 " who despise government and are not afraid to speak evil of dig- 
 nities."! Again, " Thou shalt not speak evil of the ruler of thy 
 people." | Such indiscriminate abuse and undeserved crimination 
 of civil governors is attended with manifold evils ; it is proper, 
 therefore, to bring it to the test of the consequences, as well as to 
 the standard of Scripture. § It renders them less sensible, if not 
 indeed completely insensible, to the salutary influence of public 
 opinion, when they find themselves fiercely denounced, by per- 
 haps a considerable portion of the citizens, after using their best 
 endeavours to advance the public good. In truth, the natural 
 and almost inevitable effect of faction and unprincipled party 
 spirit is to destroy the force of public opinion, with all its mani- 
 fold advantages, even upon men of the most upright mind. To 
 a tone of censure and denunciation, which knows not how, and 
 does not care, to discriminate, but is only anxious to accuse 
 and misrepresent, rulers soon come to pay no regard. 
 
 * Romans xiii. 1-7. t 2 Peter ii. 10; Jude 8. 
 
 t Acts xxiii. 5 ; Exodus xxii. 28. § See pp. 33 - 37. 
 
112 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY. [Part II. 
 
 Besides, when the loud notes of censure and denunciation come 
 from one side ; the other side is, in a measure, compelled to 
 meet this indiscriminate abuse and invective, not only with de- 
 fensive weapons of like temper, but also with like indiscriminate 
 justification and eulogy of men and measures ; until, at length, 
 present effect, and not truth, is the object universally aimed at by 
 those who take an active part and interest in political transac- 
 tions. Truth, candor, justice, fairness, and even kindness and 
 courtesy, are gradually lost sight of ; and abuse, calumny, misrep- 
 resentation, denunciation, unmeasured impudence, and falsehood, 
 become the settled order of things in politics, — naturally the 
 most dignified, practical, and useful of all the moral sciences, and 
 the most directly pertaining to human welfare and happiness. 
 
 But, besides putting a fair and equitable construction on the 
 sentiments and measures of rulers, it is the duty of the citizens 
 to give them a fair and reasonable active support, until their 
 conduct has been such as justly to forfeit a liberal confidence. 
 But power is encroaching in its nature ; it therefore becomes the 
 citizens to be watchful of the tendency of measures and events, 
 and the conduct of rulers may u»questionably be such as justly 
 to forfeit public confidence and support. But, until the proofs 
 of maladministration become full and distinct, we cannot right- 
 fully refuse to sustain them. 
 
 Even when an administration comes into office against our 
 wishes and endeavours, and consequently without our confidence, 
 it is still our duty to abstain from prejudging them ; — they are 
 still entitled to be judged by their measures, to be tried by 
 their own merits. We are to act for the good of our country, 
 and not from passion, prejudice, or personal pique. No adminis- 
 tration of government, however wise and upright, can be re- 
 spectable and useful, much less successful, unless it be well sus- 
 tained ; and an administration which, if suitably sustained, might 
 have conducted the affairs of the country successfully, may, for 
 want of such sustaining aid, signally fail, to the lasting injury, 
 possibly to the ruin, of the country. The effects of such a result 
 must be felt by the private citizens, as well as by the adminis- 
 tration, which they have so disastrously opposed, or failed to 
 sustain. No one will say, that, in such a state of things, the 
 
Chap. II.] DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. 113 
 
 administration alone is the guilty party. They had a right to 
 expect a fair and reasonable support from their constituents, and 
 if this has not been given them, their responsibility is, to say the 
 least, greatly diminished. 
 
 Such are the moral duties of private citizens towards their 
 rulers, whether hereditary or elective, — but it is, if any thing, 
 still more imperative on civil rulers and magistrates, as far as con- 
 sists with reason and conscience, to aid and sustain each other. 
 The opposition, then, are morally bound to render satisfactory 
 reasons at the bar of their consciences and of their country, why 
 they are found opposing an administration to whose hands the 
 interests of the country have been intrusted. The presumption, 
 in such a case, is certainly against them, and they must remove 
 this presumption by fact and argument ; — otherwise their course 
 is morally unjustifiable, factious motives may be justly imputed 
 to them, and it is not too harsh to call them an unprincipled 
 faction. 
 
 But, suppose a number of individuals to be conscientious in 
 their opposition, as assuredly they may be and often have been, 
 by what standard are they to measure their duty to their coun- 
 try ? It is not difficult to discover the moral rule which applies 
 to this contingency. An opposition may use all measures jus- 
 tifiable in themselves, to bring back an unwise or wicked admin- 
 istration to the path of right and duty ; but they must never lose 
 sight of the honor and interests of their common country, — 
 much less may they do or omit any thing to the injury of the coun- 
 try for the sake of overthrowing the administration to which they 
 are opposed. This line of distinction between a factious and 
 a principled opposition is reasonably definite ; so much so, that, 
 guided by it, good men will not vary much from each other in 
 their course. 
 
 But it is precisely here, in applying this rule, that the most 
 exact knowledge, mature judgment, perfect command of temper, 
 freedom from prejudice, fixedness of principles, and unwavering 
 sense of rectitude and duty, are wanted to insure an upright 
 and patriotic course of conduct. There have been statesmen, 
 who claimed to be patriots of u the first water" ; to all appear- 
 15 
 
114 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY. [Part II. 
 
 ance, willing to ruin their country, provided they could ruin the 
 existing administration.*- Such conduct cannot well be deemed 
 too reprehensible. And in every free country, where party 
 spirit must always be expected, and, within reasonable limits, 
 is even desirable, the limits beyond which party warfare may not 
 be rightfully waged, and the moral restraints through which it 
 cannot rightfully break, should be well and distinctly understood 
 by all ranks of people. 
 
 " I consider the first duty of every branch of the government," 
 says Mr. John Quincy Adams, late President of the United 
 States, " is, to harmonize with every other branch in the transac- 
 tion of the business of the people ; that the first duty of every 
 member of the House of Representatives is, to support the 
 President of the United States, to support the executive gov- 
 ernment of the country in every measure belonging properly to 
 its high office, in every measure in which the judgment of the 
 individual acting can support the proceedings of the executive. 
 In like manner, it is equally his duty to support the measures, 
 which pass in the other branch of the legislature ; — this duty is 
 reciprocally obligatory upon the Senate and the House of Rep- 
 resentatives. This I have always considered, as the first duty 
 of every person concerned in the administration of the govern- 
 ment, whether in the legislative or executive branches. There is 
 another subsequent duty," continues he, " by which each of these 
 three branches is made a guardian and sentinel over the acts of 
 the other, and in which it may be their duty, (and a painful one 
 it must be at all times,) to oppose any measure, be it of the 
 executive or the other branches of the legislature, which they 
 may think inconsistent with the constitution, or with the inter- 
 ests of the people. Harmony between the two branches of the 
 legislature is of extreme importance, — harmony between the 
 legislative branches and the executive is scarcely less impor- 
 tant." f These sentiments of this distinguished statesman are 
 very apposite to the purpose of the latter part of this chapter, 
 and amply confirm my observations and arguments. 
 
 * Sparks's Life of Gouverneur Morris, Vol. III. p. 291-294. 
 t Speech in the House of Representatives of the United States, January 22d, 
 1836. 
 
Chap. III.] DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. 115 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 THE DUTY OF THE CITIZEN IN REGARD TO THE EXERCISE OF 
 THE ELECTIVE FRANCHISE. 
 
 It is the duty of the citizen to exercise the elective franchise 
 with integrity and discretion. This franchise is exercised with 
 integrity, when the citizen discharges the duty of voting accord- 
 ing to his honest convictions ; — it is exercised with discretion, 
 when these convictions are the result of a mature judgment and 
 an enlightened conscience. But the subject admits and requires 
 further illustration ; and, in illustrating it, my remarks will apply 
 specially to the election of members of our national and state 
 legislatures ; but, with very slight modifications, they will apply 
 to all elections whatever. 
 
 The elective franchise is rightly regarded as a public trust 
 reposed in the citizen, requiring for its suitable discharge, cer- 
 tain qualifications of sex, age, knowledge, and character, and 
 sometimes complexion. Generally, too, some estate has been 
 required as a qualification. All wise constitutions of govern- 
 ment, ancient and modern, have withheld the elective franchise 
 from woman, by reason of the manifest inconsistency between 
 her physical constitution and peculiar sphere of duty, and the 
 exercise of any political privilege, or the administration of any 
 political trust.* Most of the constitutions of the United States 
 certainly, probably all of them, have refused to permit even the 
 male sex to assume the elective trust, until the age of twenty-one 
 years, in consequence of want of knowledge, experience, self- 
 control, and general maturity of mind. This trust, moreover, 
 is almost universally denied to Africans and their descendants. 
 
 It is one of the great subjects of controversy in our day, 
 whether any estate shall be required as a qualification for voting, 
 — whether the electors shall be few (200,000), as in France; 
 
 * See Charge to the Grand Jury of Suffolk County, Mass., December, 1835. 
 By Honorable P. O. Thatcher, p. 26. 
 
116 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY. [Part II. 
 
 or many comparatively, as in England and some of our States ; or 
 whether the white males universally above twenty-one years of 
 age shall be intrusted with this franchise. It is not my pur- 
 pose, as it is not my province, to enter into this question ; and 
 it has been adverted to only for the sake of illustrating the nature 
 of the trust involved in the possession and exercise of the elec- 
 tive franchise. It is, moreover, with us, a trust of much digni- 
 ty and importance, inasmuch as the people are sovereign in this 
 country, and the safe and healthy action of our political system 
 depends entirely on the purity of purpose and principle with 
 which elections are conducted. Our system cannot long sur- 
 vive, when the elective franchise shall have generally ceased to 
 be exercised with integrity and discretion. 
 
 To this end, it is manifest, that this, like any other trust, 
 ought not to be exercised in furtherance of private and selfish 
 objects. It is conferred to be used for the public good, and in 
 exercising it the elector must be guided by a wish faithfully to 
 conform to the original design. He must be governed, in giving 
 his vote, by his own views of public affairs, carefully formed and 
 honestly entertained, and by his opinion of the character of the 
 candidate and of his claims to public confidence. His vote, then, 
 must not be influenced by mere party names and distinctions ; 
 by blind eagerness to push a friend or relation into public notice ; 
 by the desire of paying court to distinguished men with the hope 
 of thus facilitating his own election at some future time ; or by 
 private resentment against any of the candidates ; — all these 
 views and motives, and many more, which are accustomed to 
 have weight at elections, are private, selfish, degrading, in a 
 transaction in which the public interest ought to be regarded, to 
 the exclusion of every private and individual aim and interest. 
 
 The two questions involving the greatest practical difficulty, in 
 the mind of a conscientious elector, are these ; — how far may a 
 man rightfully act with a party in times of public excitement ; 
 — and how far, and in what ways, he may attempt to influence 
 the votes of other electors. 
 
 In political transactions generally, and most of all in elections, 
 men must of necessity act in concert ; and it is their duty to co- 
 operate with one another in pursuit of what they are convinced 
 
Chap. III.] DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. 117 
 
 is the general good. But there are limits to this duty, as well as 
 to every other. No good man can cooperate with, or lend his 
 influence to, a party which is pursuing an unjustifiable end. This 
 is very plain ; but parties do not so often pursue unjustifiable 
 ends, as good ends by unjustifiable means. This is the besetting 
 sin of party, and the point on which every man needs to be put 
 distinctly on his guard. A good man must not be drawn in, to 
 aid in accomplishing even a good end by means morally unjusti- 
 fiable. If there is a doubt, he may, nay, he ought, to give it 
 in favor of the party with which he is accustomed to act ; but no 
 excitement, no entreaties or reproaches of his associates, and no 
 ostensible good in prospect, should ever prevail upon him to 
 sanction palpable wrong by his participation. There is the more 
 need of caution and firmness here, because men are frequently 
 found to unite with a party in doing acts, of which they would 
 blush to be guilty when acting without the countenance and 
 encouragement of the many. But that cannot be right in a 
 multitude, which is wrong in an individual. The moral standard 
 is unchangeable ; it applies to the doings of a multitude, as well 
 as to the conduct of an individual. 
 
 Again, how far and in what ways may an elector (or a candi- 
 date) endeavour to influence the votes of other electors ? As- 
 suredly he may do this by imparting information, and by all the 
 ways known to fair argument and honorable persuasion. These 
 are means strictly moral, suitable in themselves, and honorable 
 alike to him who employs them, and to him who yields to their 
 influence. Consequently, all means of whatever kind opposite 
 to, or inconsistent with these, are immoral and dishonorable to 
 all who participate in them. 
 
 One or two examples will set this point in a clear light, and 
 show the importance of the principle which I am illustrating. 
 A celebrated writer says, " It will be found in the main, that a 
 power over a man's support, is a power over his will." Again 
 he says, " The legislature (Congress) with a discretionary power 
 over the salary and emoluments of the chief magistrate (mean- 
 ing the President of the United States) could render him as ob- 
 sequious to their will, as they might think proper to make him." 
 And further he says, "If it were necessary to confirm so plain 
 
118 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY. [Part II. 
 
 a truth by facts, examples would not be wanting, even in this 
 country, of the intimidation or seduction of the executive by 
 the terrors or allurements of the pecuniary arrangements of the 
 legislative body."* Mr. Jefferson states, moreover, that the 
 control of the legislature of Virginia over the "subsistence in 
 office " of the governor, had caused " the direction of him, dur- 
 ing the whole time of their session, to become habitual and fa- 
 miliar." f 
 
 If these things are true of the executives of the States and of 
 the United States, men of the most elevated standing in society, 
 as these celebrated authors assert, how much more emphatically 
 true must they be of immense numbers to whom our consti- 
 tutions have intrusted the exercise of the elective franchise. 
 This conclusion applies particularly to nearly all the employed 
 classes of persons in all branches of business, and through all 
 the ramifications of society. They depend for their livelihood, 
 for the conveniences and comforts of life, perhaps for their daily 
 bread, on the good-will of their employers. How imperative, 
 then, is the moral duty resting on employers of every grade and 
 kind, to abstain from invading the rights of those who may be 
 employed by them, in regard to the free exercise of the elective 
 franchise. Tested by the consequences, this duty is imperative 
 in proportion to the mischief which could not fail to result from 
 the opposite course of conduct becoming general. And how 
 flagrant an abuse of their situation as employers and patrons, to 
 interfere with this birthright of the freeman, in any of the forms 
 which intimidation so well knows how to assume and put in prac- 
 tice, — such as the forfeiture of the patron's favor, menaces to 
 tenants of expulsion from their farms, dismissal of workmen from 
 manufacturing establishments, and threatening to withdraw his 
 custom from tradesmen and artisans, in case their suffrages are 
 given contrary to his wishes. While the employer maintains his 
 own independence in giving his vote according to his judgment 
 and conscience, let him respect the independence of other men 
 as free, if not as wealthy and as well informed, as himself. 
 
 * Alexander Hamilton, Federalist, No. LXXIII. 
 t Notes on Virginia, Query 13, p. 227. 
 
Chap. IV.] DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. 119 
 
 When tried by the preceding principles, it cannot be neces- 
 sary to do more than advert to several practices, which in cases 
 of contested elections, are too common both in England and in 
 this country, to insure their unqualified reprobation in the mind 
 of every good man. The practices to which I refer, are calcu- 
 lated to corrupt and poison the political institutions of a coun- 
 try at their ultimate sources. Among the devices resorted to, 
 in order to strengthen the interest of candidates and promote 
 their success, are festive entertainments and supplies of spirituous 
 liquors furnished at their expense to all who choose to partake 
 of them ; reciprocal abuse and vilification of the candidates, and 
 of all others who take a conspicuous part in elections ; menaces 
 of violence and even actual violence at the polls ; imposing on 
 the opposite party by the artifices and stratagems so well known 
 to practised partisans ; prostituting the dignity and influence of 
 official station to the success of party arrangements and combina- 
 tions ; invoking the whole host of sectional, national, and per- 
 sonal prejudices, to give fresh virulence to party warfare ; the 
 organization of affiliated societies, (clubs and unions,) under 
 party names, pervading every nook and corner of the country, 
 and, by profligate emissaries, instituting an inquisition in every 
 neighbourhood and family ; and, lastly, the bringing the elective 
 franchise, by the undisguised sale and purchase of votes, into 
 public market in the broad light of day. 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 THE DUTY OF THE CITIZENS TO CULTIVATE A PATRIOTIC SPIRIT 
 AND THE PATRIOTIC VIRTUES. 
 
 The duty of the citizens to cultivate a patriotic spirit and the 
 patriotic virtues comes next to be stated and illustrated. In the 
 first stages of society, before the passions were curbed by edu- 
 cation and discipline, before agriculture was advanced, com- 
 merce and manufactures introduced, the arts and sciences in- 
 vented, or the true religion made known, the great body of the 
 
120 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY. [Part II. 
 
 people of every country were soldiers. War was the most 
 honorable calling in the community, and the profession of the 
 soldier naturally had the ascendency over every other. In such 
 a state of society, the spoils of victory were the most honorable 
 of all acquisitions, and it was deemed unworthy of a man to ac- 
 quire by labor what might be obtained by blood.* 
 
 As society advanced, the fierce spirit of war was softened, 
 the arts of peace began to be cultivated ; knowledge, morals, and 
 the true religion, took the place of ignorance and superstition ; 
 industry became honorable ; and life, blessed by the fruits of 
 labor and virtue, became gradually, at least in Christian coun- 
 tries, comfortable, refined, and happy. The achievements of 
 war have ever, by their brilliancy, struck the imagination more 
 forcibly than the mild pursuits of peace ; and, until civilization 
 was far advanced, the martial spirit was the genuine spirit of 
 patriotism, and took precedence over every thing else. And 
 while this spirit, as has before been said, has gradually given 
 way to the better order of things, with which we have long since 
 become familiar ; still much of it has been transferred to our 
 times, and along with it the ancient estimate of the superior im- 
 portance of the military profession. Hence it is, that even in 
 our day, when the kingdom of the Prince of Peace is extensively 
 established in the earth, the martial spirit, martial achievements, 
 and martial renown, continue to be regarded by many, as the 
 almost exclusive test, measure, and evidence of patriotism. 
 
 But assuredly, without wishing to condemn the military spirit 
 when suitably tempered and disciplined, or to detract from the 
 value of military services, this view and estimate of patriotism 
 and of the patriotic spirit are unnatural, illiberal, and unreasonable. 
 What is there in the martial spirit or in martial services, which 
 can make them patriotic, to the exclusion of successful invention 
 in the arts and sciences, the diffusion of knowledge and reli- 
 gion, and whatever other blessings the reign of morals, order, 
 industry, and peace confer on mankind. 
 
 When analyzed, the spirit of patriotism consists of at least 
 two elements, — the love of country, and a willingness to employ 
 
 * Tacitus, De Moribus Germanorum, c, 14. 
 
Chap. IV.] DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. 121 
 
 the choicest powers, physical, intellectual, and moral, in advanc- 
 ing its interest, honor, and happiness. Every man whose breast 
 is warmed by the love of country, and who is ready to devote 
 his best powers of body and mind to its welfare, is fully entitled, 
 in the best sense of the term, to the name and honors of patriot- 
 ism. If it is urged, that the soldier devotes his life to the ser- 
 vice of his country ; a sacrifice which, from the nature of the 
 case, can be made in no peaceful profession, still, conceding the 
 most that can be made of the argument in this way, the soldier 
 is only entitled to higher praise, and, by no means, to the exclu- 
 sive honors of patriotism. 
 
 " The love of our country," says Vattel, u is natural to all 
 men. The good and wise author of nature has taken care to 
 bind them by a kind of instinct, to the places where they received 
 their first breath. * But, frequently, some causes unhappily 
 weaken or destroy this natural impression. The injustice or 
 severity of the government too easily effaces it in the hearts of 
 the subjects."! Again ; he says, " The state will be powerful 
 and happy, if the good qualities of the subject, passing beyond 
 the narrow sphere of the virtues of individuals, become the vir- 
 tues of citizens. The grand secret of giving the virtues of 
 individuals so happy a turn with respect to the state, is, to in- 
 spire the citizens with an ardent love for their country. It 
 will naturally follow, that each will endeavour to serve the state, 
 and to apply all his powers and abilities to the advantage and 
 glory of the nation." " And," continues he, u he must be 
 very ignorant of politics, who does not know, that a virtuous 
 nation will be more capable than any other, of forming a state 
 that is at once happy, tranquil, flourishing, solid, respected by 
 its neighbours, and formidable to its enemies." J Such are the 
 views of this distinguished writer, in regard to the patriotic spirit 
 and the patriotic virtues of the most effective and valuable kind. 
 These virtues consist of industry, frugality, moderation combined 
 with energy, physical and moral courage, disciplined passions, 
 justice, benevolence, enterprise, foresight, and good faith, all 
 enlightened and guided by exact and comprehensive knowledge. 
 
 * See the Odyssey, Lib. IX. 34 - 36. t Law of Nations, p. 110, 
 
 $ Idem, pp. 108,109. 
 
 16 
 
122 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY. [Part II. 
 
 The opinion prevailed in the time of Cicero, that the martial 
 were superior to the civil and peaceful virtues ; but this opinion 
 was not received by that profound moralist and accomplished 
 statesman.* The services of Washington were neither less 
 patriotic, nor less valuable, when, as chief magistrate of the 
 United States, he was presiding over the civil interests of his 
 country, than when, directing the storm of war and surrounded by 
 its u pomp and circumstance," he was triumphing over the 
 armies of Great Britain, at Boston, at Princeton, and at York- 
 town. Civil transactions compose much of every military cam- 
 paign, and the event of military arrangements not unfrequently 
 turns on them ; and the revolutionary services of Washington, 
 Greene, and La Fayette, great as they were, were not more in- 
 dispensable to the success of the contest, than those of Franklin, 
 Adams, Jay, and Jefferson. 
 
 In fact, history makes known with the most convincing evi- 
 dence, the truth, that mere physical power is of little avail, — 
 nay, is absolute weakness, unless directed by skill and energy, 
 and sustained by moral principles and the practice of the moral 
 virtues. Moral power and well-digested discipline, capacity for 
 order and arrangement, wisdom to direct among the well-edu- 
 cated and well-principled citizens of a country, much more than 
 personal prowess and individual valor, are the chief tower of 
 strength to a country. This view of the ascendency of moral 
 power (and how can it be gainsaid ?) over the affairs of a nation, 
 and even over the events of war itself, widens immeasurably the 
 field of patriotic feeling, enterprise, and achievement. More 
 than this ; it reverses the order of merit on the scale of patriot- 
 ism ; physical force becomes subordinate to moral ; every man 
 may become a distinguished patriot without commanding an 
 army ; and whoever contributes most to promote education, to 
 augment the treasures of knowledge, to enlarge the circle of the 
 arts and sciences, and more especially to sustain and strengthen 
 the transcendent cause of morals and religion, is, of all men, best 
 entitled to have his brows adorned with the honors of patriotism. 
 
 * De Officiis, Lib. I. c. 22. 
 
Chap. V.J DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. 123 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 THE DUTY OF CITIZENS TO KEEP THEMSELVES WELL INFORMED 
 RESPECTING PUBLIC MEN AND PUBLIC MEASURES. 
 
 It is the duty of citizens to keep themselves well informed 
 respecting public men and public measures. The exercise of the 
 elective franchise by the people, is the principal way by which 
 their sovereignty is made manifest ; and, to do this habitually with 
 good judgment and discretion, a competent acquaintance with 
 public affairs, and with the individuals who may from time to 
 time become candidates for public office, is indispensable. Want 
 of knowledge in a nation is an evil next in magnitude to a want 
 of moral principle, and a disregard of the moral and patriotic 
 virtues. 
 
 Indeed, knowledge and morals, in a nation, are most intimately 
 allied ; and it has been distinctly seen from the very founding of 
 our institutions, that they could fulfil the hopes and expectations 
 entertained of them, only while the great body of the people 
 continued to be both well informed and moral in their habits. 
 Moreover, the sentiment seems to have been universal in this 
 country, that a well-educated people, would, of course, be a 
 moral people ; and, if instruction in religion be made a part of 
 popular education, the sentiment is fully sustained by experience. 
 This most intimate connexion between knowledge and good 
 morals, explains why the founders of our political institutions, 
 have so much relied for their success on universal popular educa- 
 tion. Believing the connexion between knowledge and morals 
 to be indissoluble, they justly argued, that by effectually securing 
 universal education, good moral habits and principles must prevail 
 among the great body of the people. 
 
 To this end, our state constitutions of government have made 
 education, and the dissemination of knowledge, a subject of 
 special recommendation and enactment ; and the framers of those 
 instruments, and the people in adopting them, have manifested an 
 
 Y 
 
124 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY. [Part II. 
 
 anxiety and earnestness on this vital subject, of which we cannot 
 be fully sensible, without making some examination. It must 
 suffice, however, (o select a sentence from one of the state con- 
 stitutions in each of the four great sections of the union, the 
 northern, middle, southern, and western. 
 
 The constitution of Massachusetts says, u Wisdom and know- 
 ledge, as well as virtue, diffused generally among the body of the 
 people, being necessary for the preservation of their rights and 
 liberties, and as these depend on spreading the opportunities and 
 advantages of education in the various parts of the country, and 
 among the different orders of the people, it shall be the duty of 
 the legislatures and magistrates, in all future periods of this com- 
 monwealth, to cherish the interests of literature and the sciences, 
 and all seminaries of them ; especially the university at Cam- 
 bridge, and public schools and grammar schools in the towns." # 
 The constitution of Pennsylvania says, u The legislature shall, as 
 soon as conveniently may be, provide by law for the establish- 
 ment of schools throughout the State, in such manner that the 
 poor may be taught gratis. The arts and sciences shall be pro- 
 moted in one or more seminaries of learning."! The constitu- 
 tion of Georgia says, "The arts and sciences shall be promoted 
 in one or more seminaries of learning ; and the legislature shall, 
 as soon as conveniently may be, give such further donations and 
 privileges to those already established, as may be necessary to 
 secure the objects of their institution." J The constitution of 
 Ohio says, "Religion, morality, and knowledge, being essential- 
 ly necessary to the good government and the happiness of man- 
 kind, schools and the means of instruction shall for ever be en- 
 couraged by legislative provision." § 
 
 These wise constitutional provisions have been carried into as 
 full effect, as the nature of a free government permits, which can 
 only give the people the opportunity of having their children 
 taught, but cannot, like an arbitrary government, compel them to 
 avail themselves even of a provision so much and so obviously 
 for their benefit. But it may be said with great truth, that, in 
 every State of the Union, no one needs to fail of an education 
 
 f Chap. V. Sect. 2. t Art. VII. 1,2. t Art. IV. Sect. 13. § Art. VIII. 3. 
 
Chap. V.] DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. 125 
 
 suited to qualify him for the duties of citizenship. Nor have the 
 constitutions and laws of the States alone manifested this earnest- 
 ness and anxiety for universal education and the diffusion of use- 
 ful knowledge among the great body of the people. The govern- 
 ment of the United States has appropriated a large proportional 
 part of all the public lands * for the encouragement of education ; 
 and, in the federal constitution and laws, special care is taken to 
 furnish the people with political information on which they can 
 with safety rely, and to facilitate their acquiring it in every pos- 
 sible way. Congress is forbidden to make any law abridging the 
 freedom of speech or of the press, f To the same end, each 
 House is required to keep a journal of its proceedings, and, with 
 the exception of such parts as may in their judgment require 
 secrecy, to publish the same from time to time. J The debates 
 in both Houses (except when confidential business is transacted) 
 are open to the public ; and, to give all possible assurance of full 
 information being brought into debate, no member of either 
 House of Congress can be questioned in any other place for any 
 speech or debate in either House. § Moreover, it is made the 
 constitutional duty of the President of the United States to give 
 to Congress, from time to time, information of the state of the 
 Union. || The documents in which this information is conveyed 
 are very numerous ; and they are not only indispensable to the 
 wise action of Congress, but come from the highest and most 
 authentic source of information on public affairs, and the national 
 mind is annually instructed and enlightened by them. 
 
 The legislation of Congress has been in the best spirit of the 
 provisions of the constitution. The freedom of the press is so 
 unrestrained, that men are scarcely made responsible for its 
 abuse ; and it may be said with truth, that the blessings which it 
 is fitted to confer, are greatly diminished by its licentiousness. 
 The journals of Congress and other public documents are pub- 
 
 * An entire section (a square mile, or 640 acres) in each township of six miles 
 square, is appropriated by law to the support of common schools in all the new 
 States, — besides tracts for the ample endowment of universities, colleges, acad- 
 emies, &c. According to Mr. Clay's Report on the Public Lands, of April 16th, 
 1832, the aggregate of 8,460,547 acres had been appropriated to all these objects. 
 
 t See Amendment I. J: Article I. Section 5. 3. 
 
 § Article I. Section 6. 1. || Article II. Section 3. 1. 
 
126 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY. [Part II. 
 
 lished in such numbers, that, if the people fail of adequate infor- 
 mation on public affairs, it can only be for want of time to read 
 papers so voluminous. Every public library is gratuitously sup- 
 plied with complete copies of them, and they are freely distrib- 
 uted by the members of Congress among those whom they repre- 
 sent. Newspapers, being the great vehicle of every-day informa- 
 tion respecting public men and public measures, are made by law 
 the objects of special favor in the arrangement of the mail, the 
 expense of conveyance being so light as not to be burthensome 
 to the poorest citizen; and more than ten thousand (11,100) 
 post-offices convey them to every village and neighbourhood. 
 Further to encourage the diffusion of political information which 
 might not find its way into the public documents and newspapers, 
 the same freedom from even the slightest expense of conveyance, 
 is extended to the correspondence of every member of Congress, 
 and every citizen is thus invited to communicate with the repre- 
 sentative of his district with the utmost freedom, or with any 
 other member with whom he may wish to hold communication. 
 Thus invited and encouraged, and fully supplied with sources on 
 which full reliance may be placed, if any citizen fails to keep 
 himself well informed of public men and measures, he can com- 
 plain of no one but himself. 
 
 There are several other topics of argument by which this 
 duty of the citizen might have been illustrated, — such as the 
 indispensable necessity of the people possessing this information, 
 to the suitable and satisfactory performance of any of the duties of 
 citizenship ; and the consideration, that, in a popular government, 
 the acquirement of this knowledge by the citizens is only quali- 
 fying themselves to superintend their own business. But I have 
 chosen the argument, by which the duty of the citizen to ac- 
 quire the requisite information is inferred from the extraordinary 
 facilities furnished him to this end ; and the rather so, because 
 this source of illustration seems to have been seldom used. It 
 may well be argued, that every duty is the more imperative as 
 the means of fulfilling it are the more easily obtained. And, as 
 the nation has, in its wisdom, rendered the means of political in- 
 formation accessible to all, what can excuse an individual from 
 the duty of availing himself of them ? 
 
Chap. IV.] DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. 127 
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 
 THE DUTY OF THE CITIZEN TO AID IN THE DEFENCE OF HIS 
 COUNTRY, AND IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE, BY SERV- 
 ING ON JURIES, GIVING TESTIMONY ON OATH, &c. 
 
 It is easy to understand, that universal peace is the interest of 
 all nations ; still history attests, that the utmost comity of one 
 nation towards every other, joined with the most even-handed 
 justice, has not always secured to it this great and invaluable 
 blessing. The perverse passions of mankind,* the ambition and 
 sometimes the resentment of princes, the thirst of powerful indi- 
 viduals for personal distinction, the dazzling splendor of military 
 glory acting on warm imaginations, the love of enterprise in 
 many, and passion for excitement in all, conflicting rights, claims, 
 and interests, and sometimes questions of mere etiquette, have 
 all had their influence in disturbing and desolating the earth with 
 frequent, afflictive, and sanguinary wars. 
 
 We may hope and trust, that the blessing is in reserve for 
 mankind, to have an international tribunal established for the ad- 
 justment of national controversies without the arbitration of the 
 sword. But hitherto all attempts to establish such a tribunal 
 have been unsuccessful, the hopes of the friends of universal 
 peace have been uniformly disappointed, and, amidst the conflict- 
 ing interests, passions, and prejudices of individuals, parties, and 
 nations, the maxim still retains much of its original force, that 
 u the best way to insure peace is, to be fully prepared for war." 
 Our duties, moral as well as civil, are prescribed by the present 
 condition, circumstances, and prospects of human affairs ; — 
 they must necessarily have reference to the existing state of 
 things, and not to what we may wish they were, and may trust 
 they will be at some time hereafter. And, as it is a moral duty 
 of a very high order, to obey the government under which we 
 
 * James iv. 1. 
 
128 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY. [Part II. 
 
 live,* it seems too plain to require or even to admit further illus- 
 tration, that all citizens who cannot claim exemption on some 
 fair and reasonable ground, are morally bound, when called upon 
 by government, to aid, and, if need be, personally to take part in 
 the defence of their country. This aid is to be given cordially 
 and cheerfully, not in obedience to power which we cannot re- 
 sist, but as a part of our moral duty. 
 
 Again, it is the duty of the citizen to render personal aid in 
 the administration of justice, by serving on juries and by giving 
 testimony on oath. cc The trial by jury," says Sir Matthew 
 Hale, " is justly esteemed one of the chief excellences of the 
 English constitution, it being an institution most admirably calcu- 
 lated for the preservation of liberty, life, and property. Indeed, 
 what greater security can we have for these inestimable blessings, 
 than the certainty that we cannot be divested of either, without 
 the unanimous decision of twelve of our honest and impartial 
 neighbours ? This tribunal was universally established among all 
 the northern nations, and so interwoven with their very constitu- 
 tions, that the earliest account of the one, gives us also some 
 traces of the other. In this nation," continues he, " it has been 
 used time out of mind, and is coeval with the civil government 
 thereof ; and, though its establishment was shaken for a time by 
 the introdution of the Norman trial by battle, it was always so 
 highly valued by the people, that no conquest, no change of gov- 
 ernment could ever prevail to abolish it." f 
 
 Our ancestors brought the trial by jury with them, when they 
 settled this country, and the eulogiurn bestowed upon it by the 
 wise, pious, and learned jurist just quoted, is not beyond their 
 estimate of its value. It was claimed and admitted as a right 
 from the beginning ; and, when this right was abridged by the 
 British Parliament, the Congress of 1774 declared (see the fifth 
 of their Resolutions), that " the respective colonies are entitled 
 to the common law of England, and more especially to the great 
 and inestimable privilege of being tried by their peers of the vi- 
 cinity, according to the course of that law." In fact, the trial 
 
 * See p. 100. — Rom. xiii. 1 - 7; 1 Peter ii. 1 3 - 17. 
 t History of the Common Law, Vol. II. p. 134. 
 
Chap. VI] DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. 129 
 
 by jury has always been regarded as the chief glory of our sys- 
 tem of jurisprudence, and it is made the duty, as it is also the 
 privilege of the citizen, in this way, personally to participate in 
 the practical administration of justice. The grand, jury, more- 
 over, besides being the grand inquest for the indictment of crim- 
 inals, are the constituted guardians of the morals of the country, 
 and in respect to this part of their functions, seem to correspond 
 to the Roman censors,* to whom the cognizance and supervis- 
 ion of the public morals were committed. 
 
 This institution, therefore, so venerable for its antiquity, its 
 wisdom, and its practical value, evinced in the preservation and 
 security of estate, freedom, life, and character, wherever it has 
 flourished, has been esteemed too valuable to be intrusted to any 
 delegated body whatever ; — the people of this country, as well as 
 of Great Britain, have wisely determined, by retaining it within 
 their own keeping, to preserve, maintain, and defend it in its 
 original integrity, and to hand it down unimpaired in value to 
 coming generations. It is an institution, then, in the undimin- 
 ished purity of which, the people have a universal interest. No 
 one can foresee how soon his fortune, his reputation, his liberty, 
 or his life may depend on the verdict of a jury ; and, however 
 upright the jurors may be, it is still a valuable feature of this 
 mode of trial, that their sense of justice is stimulated by antici- 
 pating the possibility, that they may in turn, at some future time, 
 be themselves placed in the situation of the accused. 
 
 But, after all the safeguards which this institution contains 
 within itself, and which can be thrown around it, many and great 
 as they are, its practical value must essentially depend on the 
 virtue and intelligence of the great body of the citizens, — on 
 the candor, integrity, sense of justice, knowledge, and sagacity, 
 strength, and comprehension of mind, earnest and continued at- 
 tention, impartiality, freedom from prejudice and passion, firm- 
 ness, and personal independence of the individuals, who make 
 up the jury. Without candor, integrity, and a strong sense of 
 justice, it may be a matter of indifference to the jury how they de- 
 cide the causes which come before them ; without knowledge, and 
 
 Censores mores populi regunlo. Cicero de Legibus, Lib. III. c. 3. 
 
 17 
 
130 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY. [Part II. 
 
 sagacity, strength, and comprehension of mind, and earnest and 
 unbroken attention, they may, after the most full and lucid state- 
 ments and illustrations of the bar and court, still be too imper- 
 fectly acquainted with the many facts, circumstances, and rea- 
 sonings pertaining to the case, to come to a sound decision on 
 its merits ; if, again, they are wanting in impartiality and are influ- 
 enced by prejudice and passion, the stains with which partiality, 
 prejudice, and passion are accustomed to discolor every object, 
 will be seen on their verdict ; if, finally, they are wanting in 
 firmness and independence of understanding and judgment, they 
 will be led blindly by the court, or in times of strong popular 
 excitement, yielding to the general impulse, they will become the 
 tools of party, or mere instruments in ministering to the excited 
 passions of the multitude. 
 
 It is the duty, then, of the citizen, to bring to the mainte- 
 nance and support of this institution, those qualifications of heart 
 and understanding, which are indispensable to give it its full effect 
 and influence, and to sustain the high estimation with which it 
 has been regarded wherever it has been known. Jury trials can 
 fully answer their end, only in countries where education and the 
 moral and manly virtues prevail, and only so long as they pre- 
 vail ; and the state of trial by jury in any country is a very good 
 index of the morals and intelligence of the people. Moreover, 
 any duty which is committed to the hands of very many is in 
 danger of being neglected by all ; and hence it happens, that 
 many of our citizens, if they have suitable impressions of the 
 importance of the institution, seem to be without adequate views 
 of the moral and intellectual qualifications required, and of the 
 moral responsibilities which the duty of a juryman imposes on 
 him. The trial by jury is the main pillar in the temple of justice ; 
 and impartiality, truth, knowledge, wisdom, integrity, candor, 
 firmness, patience, and independence adorn its portals, and be- 
 come its sacred precincts. It is the duty of the citizen further 
 to aid in the administration of justice by giving testimony on oath 
 in courts of justice, when required by law. 
 
 Some persons, in their estimate of the obedience which they 
 owe to the laws of their country, acknowledge themselves 
 morally bound by such laws as prohibit intrinsic evil (malum 
 
Chap. VT.J DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. 131 
 
 per se)j while they consider themselves at liberty to evade, and 
 this, too, with a safe conscience, such laws as make any thing an 
 offence (malum prohibitum), which was not such before their 
 enactment. For instance, theft is intrinsically a crime, in its 
 nature ; but smuggling is an offence made such by the enact- 
 ment of law. This distinction, when made for the purpose of 
 obeying one law, and evading or breaking another, is unquestion- 
 ably unsound. The law of the land is one of the chief moral 
 rules by which the conduct of all is to be squared, and with a 
 very few exceptions, and those of a character clearly extraordi- 
 nary, is morally binding on all. # 
 
 CHAPTER VII. 
 
 MORAL DUTIES OF THE UNITED STATES, REGARDED AS 
 COMMUNITIES, TO ONE ANOTHER. 
 
 Independent states, kingdoms, empires, commonwealths, 
 all civil communities, under whatever name, are moral persons, 
 endowed with understanding, will, and conscience, capable of 
 merit or demerit, responsible for their acts, and charged with 
 duties of various kinds, f 
 
 The United States owe to one another all the duties pre- 
 scribed by the Law of Nature and Nations, which independent 
 nations owe to each other. The principle which lies at the 
 foundation of these duties, says Montesquieu, is, that u different 
 nations ought to do each other as much good in peace, and as 
 little harm in war, as possible, without injury to their true inter- 
 ests." J Lord Bacon says, u The Divine Law is the perfection 
 both of the Law of Nature and Nations," and he applies the law 
 of Christian charity, § and the law of our neighbour, || " which 
 includes the Samaritan as well as the Levite," to the case of 
 
 * See pp. 29 - 32, 100. t Valtel, Preliminary Principles, § 2. 
 
 t L'Esprit des Lois, Book I. c. 3. § " Lex charitatis," Matt. vii. 12. 
 
 || " Lex proximi," Luke x. 29 - 37. 
 
132 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY. [Part II. 
 
 nations, and this he does to the exclusion of the principles of 
 jurists, when the latter do not agree with the former. * 
 
 Again ; " In cases of doubt," says Chitty, " arising upon 
 what is the Law of Nations, it is now an admitted rule amongst 
 all European nations, that our common religion, Christianity, 
 pointing out the principles of natural justice, should be equally 
 appealed to and observed by all as an unfailing rule of construc- 
 tion." f Finally, in 1815, the emperors of Austria and Russia, 
 and the king of Prussia, " declared, in the face of the whole 
 world, their fixed resolution, both in the administration of their 
 respective states, and in their political relations with every other 
 government, to take for their sole guide, the precepts of Chris- 
 tian charity and peace, which, far from being applicable only 
 to private concerns, must have an immediate influence on the 
 councils of princes, and guide all their undertakings, and as 
 being the only means of consolidating human institutions and 
 remedying their imperfections." f Thus, these high authorities 
 distinctly recognise Christian morals and the Christian religion, 
 as the basis of the reciprocal dudes of nations. 
 
 Christianity, then, is the ultimate standard, to which, among 
 Christian nations, international duties are to be referred, and the 
 rule by which they are to be measured. Every Christian nation 
 is bound to conduct towards every other, as it wishes that others 
 should, in like circumstances, conduct towards itself. They are 
 morally bound to respect the rights, and, in every reasonable way 
 and degree, to consult the welfare and interests of one another. 
 But Vattel has well said, cc that it exclusively belongs to 
 each nation to form its own judgment of what its own conscience 
 prescribes to it ; of what it can or cannot do ; of what is 
 proper, or improper, for it to do."§ Especially, they are 
 to respect each other's freedom, independence, sovereignty, 
 and rightful jurisdiction. One nation is to perform, in all good 
 faith, the duties of neutrality towards other nations, which, unable 
 to adjust their differences by peaceable means, have submitted 
 them to the arbitration of the sword. No nation is permitted, 
 
 * Works, Vol. II. pp. 289-294. 4to. London, 1765. 
 
 t Note to Vattel on the Law of Nations, Preliminary Principles, § 3. 
 
 t Niles's Register, Vol. X. p. 92. § Preliminary Principles, § 1.4, 16. 
 
Chap. VIL] DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. 133 
 
 by its duty, to interfere in the internal concerns of another na- 
 tion. Every nation is entitled to manage its internal concerns 
 in its own way, without the interference or dictation of another. 
 Any interference of this kind tends to disturb friendly intercourse, 
 and is just cause of offence. 
 
 These duties, indeed, are too well understood to be often 
 violated ; but there is another, the violation of which is much 
 more common ; — I refer to the case of one nation counte- 
 nancing the infringement of the laws of another, and even lend- 
 ing the aid of its tribunals to carry such infringement into effect.* 
 Assuredly, Mr. Justice Story well concludes, with Pothier, 
 that such a practice is inconsistent with good morals, and sound 
 views of international duties and obligations. " The natural 
 and primary law is that of God and our conscience, the law 
 which enjoins us to do good to our neighbour, whether in literal 
 strictness he may have a perfect right to demand such treatment 
 from us or not. This is a law that ought to be as strong in 
 obligation as the most distinct and positive rule, though it may 
 not always be capable of the same precise definition, nor conse- 
 quently may allow the same remedies to enforce its observance. 
 As an individual is bound by the law of nature to deal honorably 
 and truly with other individuals, whether the precise acts re- 
 quired of him be or be not such as their own municipal law will 
 enforce ; just so a state, in its relations with other states, is 
 bound to conduct itself in the spirit of justice, benevolence, 
 and good faith, even though there be no positive rules of inter- 
 national law, by the letter of which it may be actually tied down. 
 The same rules of morality which hold together men in families, 
 and which form families into a commonwealth, also link together 
 several commonwealths as members of the great society of man- 
 kind. Commonwealths, as well as private men, are liable to 
 injury, and capable of benefit, from each other ; it is, therefore, 
 their duty to reverence, to practise, and to enforce those rules 
 of justice, which control and restrain injury, which regulate and 
 augment benefit, which preserve civilized states in a tolerable 
 condition of security from wrong, and which, if they could be 
 
 * See Story's " Commentaries on the Conflict of Laws," pp. 204, 205,212. 
 
134 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY. [Part II. 
 
 generally obeyed, would establish and permanently maintain, the 
 well-being of the universal commonwealth of the human race."* 
 
 The peculiar duties, which the United States owe to each other, 
 chiefly respect the preservation of that harmony, which it is so es- 
 sential to maintain among communities standing in a relation so 
 very intimate to one another, and without which reflecting men 
 have always foreseen, the union could not long subsist. It is the 
 moral duty of the citizen to obey the laws ; and, as the Constitu- 
 tion of the United States is the highest law known to the country, 
 an observance of its obligations, becomes the highest rule of duty 
 to the citizen next after the divine law. A constitutional duty, 
 then, is a great moral duty, binding on the states as communities, 
 and, of course, binding on the consciences of the individual 
 citizens of which the State is composed. This cannot be de- 
 nied, without falling into the absurd consequence, that what is 
 binding on the body politic, is not binding on the members. 
 But the duty of the States and of the citizens to maintain this 
 harmony, which is the great object kept in view by the Constitu- 
 tion in those of its provisions which refer to the relation and 
 intercourse of the coordinate States with each other, may be most 
 successfully illustrated by reviewing the occasions, on which it 
 has been most frequently violated, and on which future violations 
 are most likely to occur. 
 
 1. One way in which this duty of cultivating harmony and 
 maintaining friendly relations, has sometimes been violated is, 
 by a course of unfriendly legislation by one State, calculated and 
 intended to affect injuriously the interests of one or more of its 
 sister States. Such a course arises from a real or supposed in- 
 consistency of interests. f Sometimes it has arisen from a wish, 
 by one State, to obtain for its citizens exclusive advantages, 
 which in reason equally belonged to other States. f 
 
 Every thing of this kind rests on the ground, that the pecuni- 
 ary interest of a State is its highest interest ; — when, viewed as 
 a mere stroke of selfish policy, it is mistaken and short-sighted, 
 as indeed are all violations of moral duty either by individuals or 
 
 * Chitty, note to Vattel on the Law of Nations. — Prelim, Principles, § 10. 
 t See The Federalist, p. 116. X Wheaton's Reports, Vol. ix. p. 1. 
 
Chap. VII] DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. 135 
 
 communities. It is the duty of the States to cooperate with each 
 other in every thing that pertains to the common good ; and, 
 while they consult their own interest, to have a generous regard 
 for the interests of the other States. Indeed, this country has 
 witnessed many gratifying instances, in which two or more States, 
 forgetting all narrow and local interests, and laying aside all local 
 jealousies, have cordially united in enterprises tending to the 
 common good. And, while the States maintain a generous and 
 honorable rivalship in regard to the acquisition of wealth, renown, 
 and influence, let them carefully preserve an attitude of friend- 
 ship and good-will ; and let each and every one show herself 
 studiously regardful of all the civilities, proprieties, and courte- 
 sies, which are due to one another from the members of a nu- 
 merous sisterhood. 
 
 2. But harmony between the States is not in so much danger 
 of being disturbed by the direct interference of one State with 
 another, through selfish, unfriendly, and vexatious legislation, as 
 by the officious and unwarrantable interference of individuals, 
 and more especially of self-constituted societies. Societies may 
 be, and in fact, as is well known, have been organized in some 
 of the United States, designed to affect, perhaps to destroy, the 
 institutions of other States, which the individuals associated sup- 
 pose to be capable of improvement, or which, they may suppose, 
 ought to be destroyed. All this is contrary to the moral duty of 
 the individuals concerned ; and, if such societies become danger- 
 ous to the peace and safety of the States whose institutions they are 
 designed to affect, and especially when they become the subject of 
 general and official complaint, and a source of discord, misunder- 
 standing, and alarm, it seems to be the duty of the States in which 
 they exist, to suppress them by the strong and decisive arm of 
 the law.* 
 
 Any interference of one nation with the institutions or con- 
 cerns of another, however indirect, is always extremely delicate, 
 calculated to excite distrust and misunderstanding, and is just 
 cause of offence. Nor, in such a case, can the conduct of indi- 
 
 * See Governor Marcy's Message to the Legislature of New York, January, 
 1836, — and the Report of a Select Committee to the Legislature of New- 
 Hampshire, on Abolition Societies, made and accepted in January, 1837. 
 
136 OUR RELATION TO OUR COUNTRY. [Part II. 
 
 viduals, or of combinations of individuals, well be distinguished 
 from that of the nation itself. Every nation is responsible for 
 the conduct of its members. This is the established doctrine 
 of the Law of Nations, and must unquestionably apply in all its 
 force (a fortiori) to the very intimate relation subsisting among 
 the United States.* 
 
 3. Again, another way in which the harmony of the States, 
 and also of still larger sections of the Union, has been, and may 
 be still further impaired is, by the mutual abuse and vilification 
 of one another's institutions and other peculiarities, circulated in 
 newspapers, reviews, and sometimes in publications of more 
 
 * "If the other States of the Union," says the legislature of North Carolina, 
 " were foreign states, it would be a violation of national law in them, either to 
 set on foot themselves, or permit their own subjects to set on foot, any project 
 the object or tendency of which would be to disturb our peace, by arraying one 
 portion of society against another. The Constitution which unites us, and by 
 virtue of which we have ceased to be foreign states in regard to each other, 
 and have become bound in the closest union, and the most intimate relations, 
 for the promotion of the common defence and general welfare, cannot be sup- 
 posed to have lessened our mutual obligations, or to have made an act harmless, 
 which would have been gross wrong, had we continued in respect to each other 
 as we now are in respect to other nations, — in war, enemies, and only in peace, 
 friends. It is evident, on the contrary, that every duty of friendship towards 
 each other, which before existed, is by our uniou heightened in its obligation, 
 and enforced by motives the most exalted and endearing. Whatever institution 
 or state of society we think proper to establish or permit, is by no other State to 
 be disturbed or questioned. We enter not into the inquiry, whether such insti- 
 tution be deemed by another State just or expedient. It is sufficient that we 
 think proper to allow it. To protect us from attempts to disturb what we allow 
 and they approve, would be to support not our institutions, but their own opin- 
 ions, — to exercise a supervising power over our legislation, and to insult us 
 with a claim of superiority in the very offer to discharge the duty which our 
 relations authorize us to require. As our right is indisputable to regulate ex- 
 clusively, according to our own notions, the interior relations of our own peo- 
 ple, the duty of preventing every attempt to disturb what we have established, 
 results from the simple fact, that we have established it. And the propriety and 
 impropriety, in the view of others, of such regulations as we have pleased to 
 make, can never either enhance or lessen the duty of such prevention. No 
 other State, therefore, and no portion of the people of any other State, can claim 
 to interfere in any matter of ours, either by authority, advice, or persuasion ; 
 and such an attempt, from whatever quarter it may come, must ever be met by 
 us with distrust, and repelled with indignation." (Report and Resolutions of 
 North Carolina, on the Subject of Incendiary Publications, December 19th, 
 1835.) 
 
Chap. VII.] DUTIES OF PATRIOTISM. 137 
 
 grave importance. The relation of sisterhood is singularly ex- 
 pressive of the connexion which subsists between these States, 
 — the peculiarities and even the defects of any one or more of 
 them, are entitled to be viewed with candor and even with in- 
 dulgence by any others, who may feel themselves justified in re- 
 garding whatever pertains to themselves with peculiar compla- 
 cency. At all events, it is not the part of individuals or com- 
 munities, which stand in a relation so intimate to each other, 
 whose highest interests, hopes, and prospects, — nay, whose 
 destinies are inseparably united, and who consequently must stand 
 or fall together, who have so direct and palpable an interest in 
 maintaining harmony, and in the mutual welfare and good opinion 
 of each other, to seize every occasion to abuse, vilify, and mis- 
 represent each other. Much mischief has been done by the 
 mutual abuse, vilification, and misrepresentation, which have 
 passed between the northern, southern, and western sections of 
 the Union even thus far ; — and these great divisions of the coun- 
 try, which ought to be indissolubly bound to one another by the 
 golden chain of mutual harmony and good feeling, have been 
 and may again be in danger, by reason very much of this mutual 
 abuse and irritation, of being permanently alienated, and of being 
 separated into as many alien, unsocial, jealous, and hostile sov- 
 ereignties, feeble and despicable in respect to every thing for- 
 eign, and formidable only to one another. 
 
 Finally, the several United States owe it to themselves, to 
 each other, to the Union, and to the supremacy of moral princi- 
 ple, to observe, uphold, and adhere to the Constitution of the 
 United States ; to submit to its provisions, the laws made in 
 pursuance thereof, and the decisions of its tribunals. The obli- 
 gation of this duty is in proportion to their ability to make suc- 
 cessful resistance. Many of the States are too powerful for 
 coercion ; they must be governed, therefore, not by physical 
 force, but must be kept within the rightful limits of their con- 
 stitutional duty by the strength of their inherent moral principle. 
 
 18 
 
PART THIRD. 
 
 THE CHIEF RELATIONS OF MANKIND TO ONE AN- 
 OTHER, AND THE DUTIES THENCE ARISING,— 
 THAT IS, THE DUTIES WHICH MEN RECIPROCAL- 
 LY OWE TO EACH OTHER. 
 
 Our relation to God and our country, and the duties thence 
 arising, have been as fully considered as consists with my de- 
 sign. But we sustain other relations, of various kinds, and of 
 various degrees of intimacy, the effect of all of which is, to charge 
 us with peculiar duties and impose on us peculiar responsibilities. 
 These are the relations of husband and wife, of parents and chil- 
 dren, of brothers and sisters, of master and servant, of principal 
 and agent, with (heir corresponding duties and rights. The re- 
 lations of guardian and ward, and of instructer and pupil, are 
 branches of, or rather substitutes for, the parental relation. The 
 obligation of truth between man and man, and of the observance 
 of promises, springs directly from the relation in which men 
 stand to each other as moral and responsible beings. Contracts 
 of various kinds include a very large part of the business trans- 
 actions of mankind, and the relation of the contracting parties 
 in forming and executing such contracts is another source of 
 moral duties. Our social rank and relative standing in society 
 place us in the relation of superiors, equals, or inferiors. If 
 we are blessed with wealth and consequent leisure, we are 
 thereby brought into new relations towards those who have been 
 less favored than ourselves with the bounties of Providence ; — 
 we owe them our personal services in their behalf, and pecuniary 
 relief, when they are destitute of the comforts and especially the 
 necessaries of life. The duties of friendship and hospitality, 
 and the mutual duties of benefactor and beneficiary, also claim 
 a portion of our consideration and regard. The relation of good 
 
Part III.] THE RELATIVE DUTIES OF MANKIND. 139 
 
 neighbourhood, moreover, is one on which much of our peace 
 and happiness depends. 
 
 This enumeration of the relations in which men stand to each 
 other is not complete, nor is designed to be complete ; but it 
 comprises all those which are usually made the subjects of in- 
 quiry in elementary treatises of moral philosophy. Some of 
 them are natural, others voluntary, others both natural and volun- 
 tary. Some are permanent and sanctioned by law, others are 
 transient and incidental. One (marriage) is sanctioned by the 
 united power of personal choice, law, and religion. Our relative 
 duties are chiefly performed in private, and are withdrawn from 
 the gaze of the world ; but they are extremely important, by 
 reason of their number, the constancy of their recurrence, and 
 the endless variety of their ramifications ; by which they pervade 
 human society in all its ranks, modifications, and degrees of im- 
 provement. The happiness of mankind, therefore, is deeply 
 concerned in these relations being well understood, and the duties 
 which flow from them being suitably performed. Some atten- 
 tion must have been given them in every stage of society. 
 Their importance is of the first order ; and, in every civilized 
 country, they have been made the subject of anxious and careful 
 consideration and inquiry. They are made the subject of three 
 of the ten commandments, and the Hebrew Scriptures abound 
 with precepts and examples, illustrating their nature, and en- 
 forcing their fulfilment. Christianity has recognised, strengthened, 
 and refined these relations, and has prescribed and enforced the 
 duties of many of them by new, positive, and more definite in- 
 structions. To collect these instructions, to arrange, amplify, 
 limit, and apply them to the relations of life, giving their authority 
 the first rank, and accompanying them with argument and eluci- 
 dations drawn from reason, experience, authors ancient and 
 modern, and every other accessible source, will swell this branch 
 of my treatise much beyond the size of the other parts into 
 which it is divided. 
 
 The key to the morals of this important branch of the subject, 
 is given us by our Saviour in this saying, M All things whatsoever 
 ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them, 
 for " (it is added to give preeminence to the precept) " this is 
 
140 THE RELATIVE DUTIES OF MANKIND. [Part III. 
 
 the law and the prophets."* This is the grand rule, by which 
 we must in all cases regulate our conduct towards others ; and it 
 is a rule, plain, simple, concise, intelligible, comprehensive, and 
 every way worthy of its Divine Author. Whenever we are de- 
 liberating how we ought to act towards another person in any 
 particular instance, we must, in imagination, change situations 
 with him, — we must place him in our circumstances, and our- 
 selves in his, and then impartially inquire, how we might reason- 
 ably expect him to behave towards us, if our respective situa- 
 tions were exchanged. Every man, at first sight, must perceive, 
 that this would lead to universal justice, truth, goodness, gentle- 
 ness, compassion, beneficence, forgiveness, candor, and charity, 
 and exclude every thing of an opposite nature. If we honestly 
 proceeded in this way, we should seldom need a casuist, to 
 teach us how we ought to act towards other men, in any possi- 
 ble situation or circumstances. 
 
 CHAPTER I. 
 
 THE DOMESTIC RELATIONS AND THE DUTIES SPRINGING 
 
 FROM THEM. 
 
 The domestic relations and their appropriate duties, being 
 first in the order of importance, deservedly claim the first 
 rank. The family is the original of all societies, and contains 
 the foundation and primitive elements of all other institutions. 
 The family was instituted by God himself, f and with this insti- 
 tution, he crowned the fair creation which he had made in six 
 days and pronounced very good. As it was the first of all 
 human associations, so it is the most natural, the most permanent, 
 and the most effective of good. 
 
 We are accustomed to unite ourselves into artificial associa- 
 tions, useful and valuable for the ends which they have in view ; 
 but they are the work of men's hands, they partake of the frailty 
 
 * Matt. vii. 12. t See Genesis i. 26 -28 ; ii. 18 - 24. 
 
Chap. I.] THE DOMESTIC RELATIONS. 141 
 
 of man, their author, and are not to be compared with the 
 original domestic societies into which we are united by the or- 
 dinance of God himself. In the smallest and most familiar 
 things, the thoughts of the Almighty are above our thoughts and 
 his ways above our ways.* We have asylums in which many 
 children are fed, clothed, and instructed ; hospitals in which many 
 sick, friendless, and destitute persons are received and cared for, 
 and associations whose object is, to spread the knowledge and 
 blessings of Christianity. All these institutions are useful and 
 valuable, and do distinguished honor to the age and country in 
 which we live. But how many children are fed, clothed, and 
 instructed in all our asylums, compared with the multitudes who 
 are thus much more effectually cared for in all the families which 
 fill the land ? How many sick, friendless, and destitute persons 
 are relieved in all our hospitals, compared with the number 
 among us, who, at their own houses are watched over by the 
 nursing care of mothers and sisters, and surrounded and soothed 
 by the tenderness which grows up only in the family circle ? 
 To how many do our religious associations impart the knowledge 
 and blessings of Christianity, compared with the numbers to 
 whom domestic instruction and example impart their first pious 
 impressions, and their earliest and most effectual religious training ? 
 These comparisons are not made in order to depreciate our asy- 
 lums, hospitals, and missionary associations, — far, very far from 
 it ; but that our attention may be distinctly drawn, at the outset, 
 to the importance of our domestic relations and the duties which 
 originate in them, and because we are always in danger of disre- 
 garding and neglecting whatever is familiar and of daily re- 
 currence. That simple and unostentatious society which God has 
 instituted, a family , — that refuge from the storms of life, our 
 home, raised and consecrated by the holiest instinct of our na- 
 ture, is an establishment worth infinitely more than all the insti- 
 tutions great and small, which man has ever devised. In truth, 
 just as far as this is improved, as its duties are suitably performed, 
 and its blessings prized, all artificial institutions are superseded. 
 Here, then, is the appropriate sphere for the agency of the wise 
 
 * Isaiah lv. 8, 9. 
 
142 THE RELATIVE DUTIES OF MANKIND. [Part III, 
 
 and good. Improve the family, strengthen the relations of do- 
 mestic life, and more is done for the happiness and progress of 
 mankind, than by the most splendid charities. 
 
 Moreover, whatever there is of dignity, interest or importance 
 in government, education, and religion, is all combined in the 
 family, when well regulated. It includes the maintenance of a 
 just and rightful authority, and the wise administration of discip- 
 line. The earliest and most lasting impressions are made at the 
 domestic fireside ; the manners are formed there, good or evil 
 principles are imbibed there ; the temper and affections are cul- 
 tivated and regulated there ; the habits and sentiments, which in 
 a great measure govern future life, are contracted there ; — the 
 family, then, is a more extensive and effectual place of education 
 than the school, the college, or the university. There, too, the 
 infant is first taught to lisp its brief, unaffected prayer ; there, 
 day by day, the Scriptures are searched ; and there, morning and 
 evening, the inmates prostrate themselves, in united prayer to 
 the Father of light, at the domestic altar ; — the pious family, 
 then, is a church of the most High God.* 
 
 Consulting convenience and perspicuity of arrangement, it will 
 be 'useful to subdivide this chapter, by reason of its unusual 
 length, and the variety of subjects which it embraces, into sev- 
 eral sections. I. The relation of husband and wife, and their 
 reciprocal duties. II. Of parents and children. III. Of 
 brothers, sisters, and more remote relatives. IV. Of master 
 and servant. 
 
 SECTION I. 
 
 The relation of husband and wife is the first of the domestic 
 relations, and the foundation of all the rest. In all countries 
 raised above barbarism, this relation has been considered pecu- 
 liarly sacred, and involving duties of the most solemn and respon- 
 sible kind. Almost universally, a religious sanction has been 
 believed to pertain to this relation ; and the narrative of the crea- 
 tion of man, and of the institution of marriage in the persons 
 
 * Colossians iv. 15 ; Philemon ii. ', Dr. Channing on Associations, in " The 
 Christian Examiner," of September 1829, pp. 116, 117. 
 
Chap. I.] THE DOMESTIC RELATIONS. 143 
 
 of Adam and Eve, accompanied by the strong declaration of 
 our Saviour, " What God hath joined, let not man put asun- 
 der," * seems fully to warrant this belief. 
 
 Accordingly, in Christian countries, it has, with almost uni- 
 versal consent and approbation, been solemnized by the minis- 
 ters of religion, and before the altar ; and, in the largest branch 
 of the Christian church, the dignity of a sacrament has been 
 conferred on it, and the consent of the parties is ratified by the 
 solemnities of a sacramental service. In this country, the muni- 
 cipal law regards marriage as a civil contract between the par- 
 ties, and permits its celebration by a civil magistrate ; but 
 public opinion, stronger and more authoritative than law, has 
 made this provision nothing worth, and the marriages are ex- 
 tremely few, which are not celebrated by clergymen. The 
 municipal law, moreover, although it does not acknowledge the 
 religious character of this contract, still treats it as it treats no 
 other contract. In no Christian country, can it be dissolved by 
 the mere consent of both parties, or even of all the persons in- 
 terested in its continuance ; and, in England and every one of the 
 United States, its dissolution can be accomplished only after 
 much delay and expense, and for reasons of the most peculiar and 
 pressing kind. In this State (S. Carolina), there has been no 
 instance, since the revolution, of a divorce of any kind, either by 
 the sentence of a court of justice, or by act of the legislature, f 
 
 Nor are the importance of the marriage union, and the objects 
 of its institution, unworthy of its divine origin, and of the nu- 
 merous and special guards which the law has thrown around it for 
 its protection and perpetuation. The number and solemn na- 
 ture of the duties springing from the relation, fully correspond to 
 the importance and sacredness which belong to the relation itself. 
 But how shall these duties be enumerated ? how described and 
 set forth with adequate fulness and variety of illustration ? They 
 occur every day, and almost every hour of every day. They 
 are not confined to the external conduct, nor to the expressions 
 of the tongue ; they reach the thoughts and intents of the heart. J 
 
 Besides being numerous and various, these duties are of every 
 
 * Matt. xix. 6. t Kent's Commentaries on American Law, Vol. II. p. 88. 
 
 X Matt. v. 28. 
 
144 THE RELATIVE DUTIES OF MANKIND. [Part III. 
 
 degree of magnitude. Some of them are great duties, — so 
 great, indeed, that the comfort, the happiness, nay, the salvation 
 of the parties, may depend on their being suitably performed. 
 Some of them are so delicate as to require the best-disciplined 
 temper and passions, the most just taste, the most mature judg- 
 ment, and the most cultivated understanding, for their suitable 
 appreciation and performance. Many of them are too minute 
 and evanescent to be reached by any description short of in- 
 spiration itself. And accordingly it is in the Scriptures, that we 
 find this relation and its duties described with a fulness, pertinen- 
 cy, and strength of illustration, which we attempt in vain to find 
 elsewhere. Every image and every expression by which intima- 
 cy, delicacy, and tenderness can be conveyed, is exhausted by 
 the sacred writers. The state itself is commended by St. Paul 
 to be honorable in all men.* Christianity recalled marriage to 
 the original standard appointed by the Creator, the union of one 
 man with one woman. f This union cannot rightfully be dis- 
 solved, but from a single cause. f 
 
 The equality in number, too, of men and women born in all 
 ages and countries, proves polygamy to be as inconsistent with 
 the law of nature as it is with the ordinance of God. This ar- 
 gument is used by the prophet Malachi, who well says, if it had 
 been the intention of the Almighty to permit a man to have more 
 than one wife, he would have created a greater number of women 
 than of men.§ Thus, as St. Paul says, every man is to have 
 his own wife, and every woman her own husband. || The hus- 
 band is to render unto the wife due benevolence, and likewise, 
 also, the wife unto the husband. IT Husbands are to dwell with 
 their wives according to knowledge, giving honor unto the wife, 
 as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the 
 grace of life, that their prayers be not hindered. ## The husband 
 is declared to be the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head 
 of the church. Husbands are to love their wives, even as Christ 
 also loved the church and gave himself for it.ff He that loveth 
 his wife loveth himself ; and it is declared to be as inconsistent for 
 
 * Hebrews xiii. 4. f Gen. ii. 22-24 ; Matt. xix. 3-8. J Matt. xix. 9. 
 § Malachi ii. 14 - 16- || I Cor. vii. 2. H 1 Cor. vii. 3. 
 
 ** I Peter iii. 7. ft Eph. v. 23, 25. 
 
Chap. I.] THE DOMESTIC RELATIONS. 145 
 
 a husband to hate his own flesh, which he is accustomed to nour- 
 ish and cherish, as to hate his wife.* A man leaving his father 
 and mother, and being joined to his wife, is called a great mys- 
 tery, f On the other hand, the virtuous wife is called a crown 
 to her husband ; f the heart of her husband is said safely to 
 trust in her ; — through her influence, her husband is known in 
 the gates, when he sitteth among the elders of the land. Her 
 children arise up and call her blessed, her husband also, and he 
 praiseth her.§ Wives are to submit themselves to their own 
 husbands, as unto the Lord. As the church is subject unto 
 Christ, so are wives to be 'to their own husbands in every thing. 
 The wife is to see, that she reverence her husband. || 
 
 Again, the adorning of women, is not to be the outward 
 adorning of plaiting the hair, and of wearing of gold, and of put- 
 ting on of apparel ; but it is to be the hidden man of the heart, 
 in that which is not corruptible, even the ornament of a meek 
 and quiet spirit, which is, in the sight of God, of great price. 
 Sarah, who obeyed Abraham, calling him lord, and other holy 
 women of ancient times, are made examples of suitable beha- 
 viour, who trusted in God, and adorned themselves, being in 
 subjection to their own husbands. f St. Paul declares it to be 
 fit in the Lord, that wives submit themselves to their own hus- 
 bands ; and he exhorts them to love their husbands, to love their 
 children, to be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient 
 to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed.** 
 
 The preceding passages, numerous as they are, are only a 
 small part of what the Scriptures contain, pertaining to this most 
 important of the domestic relations. They are full, distinct, au- 
 thoritative, — and there is no mistaking their import. Still it 
 may be useful specially to illustrate and dwell upon two par- 
 ticulars. 
 
 1. The union of feeling and sentiment, so much insisted on 
 between the parties to the marriage relation, in the New Testa- 
 ment, must not rest in theory alone, — it is designed to answer 
 the most important practical purposes. Without a good degree 
 
 * Eph. v. 28, 29. t Eph. v. 31, 32. t Prov. xii. 4. 
 
 § Prov. xxxi. 11, 23, 28. || Eph. v. 22, 24, 33. 
 
 IT 1 Peter iii. 1 -6. ** Col. iii. 18; Titus ii. 4, 5. 
 
 19 
 
146 THE RELATIVE DUTIES OF MANKIND. [Part III. 
 
 of unity of feeling, design, and action, every thing in a family 
 must inevitably go wrong ; and coldness and gloom, if not distrust 
 and discord, will be guests, where quiet, peace, tranquillity, mu- 
 tual regard and confidence ought to reign with unbroken sway. 
 Quietness under our own roof, and quiet in our own consciences, 
 are blessings of unknown value, for the want of which nothing can 
 atone. " Abroad," says an admirable writer, " we must more 
 or less find tribulation ; yet, as long as our home is a secure and 
 peaceful retreat from all the disappointments and cares which 
 we meet with in that great scene of vexation, the world, we may 
 still be tolerably happy. But, if that which should be our main 
 sanctuary from uneasiness becomes our principal disquietude, 
 how great must our uneasiness be. There cannot be a greater 
 curse, than to have those of one's own household one's greatest 
 foes ; when we neither can live happily with them, nor must 
 think of living apart from them." Again, "To see a well- 
 regulated family, acting as if they were one body informed by 
 one soul, where, if one member suffers, all the members suffer 
 with it ; to see those who are embarked together in one bottom, 
 whose interests are inseparably united, and therefore whose 
 hearts ought to be so too, acting in concert, adopting each other's 
 cares and making them their own, uniting their friendly beams, 
 and jointly promoting the common happiness, is a beautiful scene, 
 and amiable even in the sight of that Being, who maketh men to 
 be of one mind in a house. How joyful a thing it is for breth- 
 ren to dwell together in unity." * 
 
 How just a picture does our Saviour draw, when he says, 
 "Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation ; 
 and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand." f 
 Party distraction, conflicting interests and passions, abuse and 
 violence, strife and bitterness, are sometimes sufficiently afflictive 
 in kingdoms, commonwealths, and cities ; but in families, when 
 once they break forth, they rage with ten-fold virulence and mis- 
 chief. " When peace and tranquillity are banished from all places 
 else on the earth, the condition of life still remains tolerable, 
 while harmony presides around the domestic altar. "J 
 
 * Jeremiah Seed's Sermons, Vol. I. pp. 39, 44. t Matt. xii. 25. 
 
 X See Bishop Jeremy Taylor's Sermons, Vol. I. p. 323. 
 
Chap. I.] THE DOMESTIC RELATIONS. 147 
 
 2. The other particular deemed worthy of special illustra- 
 tion, respects the precedence assigned in the Scriptures to the 
 husband, and the corresponding obedience which the wife is en- 
 joined to render to his wishes and commands. This particular 
 is intimately connected with the preceding, inasmuch as differ- 
 ences of opinion and inclination must sometimes inevitably ex- 
 ist between persons in married life ; and it ought to be settled 
 and understood beforehand, which party shall, in the last resort, 
 give way. On this particular, St. Chrysostom says, u Equality 
 breeds contention, and one of the two must be superior, or else 
 both would strive perpetually for the dominion. Wherefore," 
 continues he, u the laws of God and the wisdom of all nations 
 have given the superiority to the husband." * 
 
 Reason and Scripture then concur in claiming precedence for 
 the husband in this respect ; and, moreover, this claim rests on 
 the substantial grounds of greater experience and knowledge of 
 the world, a superior education in most instances, and much 
 greater responsibility in providing for the wants and meeting the 
 expectations of a family. But, in using this precedence with 
 which the husband is invested, let him remember, as Bp. Jeremy 
 Taylor well says, that " A husband's power over his wife is pa- 
 ternal and friendly, not magisterial and despotic. The wife is 
 under perpetual guardianship (in perpetud tuteld), under conduct 
 and counsel ; for the power a man hath is founded in the under- 
 standing, not in the will or force ; it is not a power of coercion, 
 but a power of advice, and that government that wise men have 
 over those who are fit to be conducted by them." Again he 
 says, " The husband and wife in the family are as the sun and 
 moon in the firmament of heaven ; he rules by day, and she by 
 night, that is, in the lesser and more proper circles of her af- 
 fairs, in the conduct of domestic provisions and necessary offices, 
 and shines only by his light and rules by his authority ; and as 
 the moon in opposition to the sun shines brightest, that is, then 
 when she is in her own circles and separate regions, so is the 
 authority of the wife then most conspicuous, when she is separ- 
 ate and in her proper sphere." 
 
 * Quoted in Bishop Brownell's Commentary on the Book of Common Prayer. 
 p. 379. 
 
148 THE RELATIVE DUTIES OF MANKIND. [Part III. 
 
 And further, " Concerning the woman's duty, it consists in 
 doing whatsoever her husband commands, and so receives meas- 
 ures from the rules of his government. Her first duty is obe- 
 dience, which, because it is nowhere enjoined that the man should 
 exact of her, but often commanded to her to pay, gives demon- 
 stration that it is a voluntary cession that is required ; such a 
 cession, as must be without coercion and violence on his part, 
 but on fair inducements and reasonableness in the thing, and out 
 of love and honor on her part." Again he says, quaintly enough, 
 as elsewhere,  is that such a notice 
 as will be binding on me ? Assuredly it is not ; for I have not 
 done that which constitutes the essence of a promise. I have 
 not voluntarily excited expectation.* 
 
 4. A promise is not binding, where it is inconsistent with a 
 previous promise. Dr. Ruiherforth illustrates this position thus ; 
 "When we have once alienated a part of our liberty," says 
 he, " it is not our own to dispose of again ; when we have given 
 one man a demand upon us to act in a particular manner, we have 
 parted with our liberty in this respect, and cannot give another 
 man a demand upon us to act in a contrary manner. What is 
 here said of promises, is equally true of all other sorts of volun- 
 tary obligations. Any former obligation takes away the liberty 
 of the person who is engaged in it ; and, where he has no liberty, 
 he can do no act which will be valid, and consequently none 
 which can be binding upon him. Indeed, upon any other suppo- 
 sition, there would be no such thing as any possibility of a man's 
 being obliged at all by his own act ; which in morality is deemed 
 an absurdity. For, if a second obligation could make void the 
 first, then a third might make void the second, and a fourth might 
 make void the third, and so on without end."f If this illustra- 
 tion is rather technical, still it is perfectly sound, and is valuable 
 for its extensive application. 
 
 5. Erroneous promises are not binding in certain cases. 
 
 (1.) Where the error proceeds from the mistake or misrepre- 
 sentation of the promisee. The reason of this is, that a promise 
 evidently supposes the truth of the statement, which the promisee 
 makes, in order to obtain it. A beggar solicits your alms by a 
 story of the most pitiable distress ; you promise to relieve him 
 if he will call again ; but in the interval you discover his story 
 to be false ; this discovery, no doubt, releases you from your 
 promise. Again, one who wants your services, describes the 
 office or business for which he wishes to engage you, and you 
 promise to undertake it ; when, however, you come to enter 
 
 * Paley's Moral and Political Philosophy, p. 70. 
 t Institutes of Natural Law, p. 91. 
 
Chap. V.] (jJSEflVANCE OF PROMISES. 207 
 
 upon it, you find the profits less, the labor more, or some mate- 
 rial circumstance different from the representation which he gave 
 you. Under such circumstances, you are not bound by your 
 promise. 
 
 (2.) When the promise is understood by the promisee to be 
 based upon a certain state of facts, or when the promiser appre- 
 hended it to be so understood, and this state of the facts turns out 
 to be false, — the promise is not binding. An example will set 
 this rule in a more clear light. A father receives an account 
 from abroad, of the death of his only son, soon after which he 
 promises his fortune to his nephew. The account turns out to 
 be false. By this rule, the father is released from his. promise ; 
 not merely because he never would have made it, had he known 
 the true state of the facts, but because the nephew also himself 
 understood the promise to proceed upon the supposition of his 
 cousin's death ; or at least his uncle thought he so understood it, 
 and could not think otherwise. The promise proceeded upon 
 this supposition in the promiser's own apprehension, and, as he 
 believed, in the apprehension of both parties ; and this belief 
 on his part is the precise circumstance which sets him free. The 
 foundation of the rule is manifestly this ; — a man is bound, as has 
 been said before, to satisfy only the expectation which he intend- 
 ed to excite ; any condition, therefore, to which he intended to 
 subject, or by which he intended to limit, that expectation, be- 
 comes, when known to the promisee, an essential condition of 
 the promise. 
 
 Errors which do not come within these two rules, do not annul 
 the obligation of a promise. I promise a candidate my vote ; 
 presently another candidate appears, for whom I certainly would 
 have reserved it, had I been acquainted with his design. Here, 
 therefore, as before, my promise proceeded from misapprehen- 
 sion ; and I should never have given such a promise, had I been 
 aware of all the circumstances of the case. But the promisee 
 did not know this, nor did he receive the promise subject to the 
 condition of the other candidate not appearing, or as proceeding 
 from any such supposition ; nor did I at the time imagine, that 
 he so received it. This error, therefore, of mine must fall on 
 myself, and the promise be observed notwithstanding. In this 
 
tit 
 
 208 THE RELATIVE DUTIES OFtMAjJKIND. [Part III. 
 
 case, however, it is assumed, that the qualifications of the candi- 
 dates are equal ; otherwise the elector (such is the nature of the 
 elective franchise) must break through his promise, and prefer him 
 who is best qualified. Again, a father promises a certain fortune 
 with his daughter, supposing his estate to amount to a certain sum ; 
 but upon examination, his affairs are in a worse condition than he 
 was aware of. Here, also, the promise was erroneous ; but, for 
 the reason assigned in the last case, will still be binding. 
 
 The case of erroneous promises is attended with some diffi- 
 culty ; — on the one hand, to allow every mistake or change of 
 circumstances to dissolve the obligation of a promise, would be 
 to admit a latitude which might set aside the force of almost all 
 promises ; and, on the other hand, to gird the obligation so tight 
 as to make no allowances for manifest and fundamental errors, 
 would, in many instances, be productive of great hardship and 
 even absurdity.* 
 
 6. A promise is not binding when the performance is impossi- 
 ble. As plain as this may seem at first sight, still it admits of 
 some illustration. The promiser is guilty of fraud, if he is se- 
 cretly aware of the impossibility, at the time of making the 
 promise ; because, when any one promises any thing, his prom- 
 ise implies, that he is convinced of the possibility of performing 
 it, and no one can accept or understand a promise under any 
 other supposition. With a knowledge of the impossibility of 
 performance, the promiser is justly chargeable with a flagrant 
 breach of good faith. If the promiser himself occasions the 
 impossibility of performance, it is a still more flagrant breach of 
 good faith ; as when a soldier or servant maims or otherwise 
 disables himself, that he may avoid performing his engagements.! 
 
 Again, it generally depends upon the promiser himself, wheth- 
 er it shall be possible for him to perform his promises ; some act 
 or some endeavours of his may be necessary to put him in such 
 a situation as will make the performance possible. A promise, 
 in this case, binds him to the doing of those acts, or to the using 
 of those endeavours, though such acts and such endeavours are not 
 mentioned in it ; since he who has obliged himself to the end, 
 
 * See Paley's Moral and Political Philosophy, pp. 80-82. 1 Idem, p. 75. 
 
 Ghap. V.] OBSERVANCE OF PROMISES. 209 
 
 cannot but be understood to have obliged himself to use the 
 necessary means of attaining the end. It cannot be said to be 
 impossible for a man to do any thing, which can be accomplished 
 by his own acts or endeavours. A promise, therefore, of this 
 sort is binding from the beginning ; and, though the promiser has 
 not, in express terms, bound himself to do these acts or to use 
 these endeavours, yet, if the possibility of performing what he 
 has promised depends upon them, he is obliged to do them by 
 virtue of his promise. 
 
 7. A promise is not binding when the performance is im- 
 moral.* Sometimes the performance of the promise is known 
 to the parties to be immoral at the time when the promise was 
 made, as where an assassin promises his employer to despatch his 
 rival or his enemy, or a servant promises to betray his master. 
 These promises and the like of them are not binding, because 
 their performance is criminal ; their guilt, therefore, lies in the 
 making, not in the breaking of them ; and if, in the interval be- 
 tween the promise and the performance, conscience awakens and 
 regains its rightful supremacy, the promiser will repent of his 
 engagements, and will assuredly break through them. In these 
 cases, the object of the promise is immoral, in the highest sense 
 too ; and this makes the performance immoral, and therefore not 
 binding. 
 
 Again, sometimes the immorality of the performance did not 
 
 * Rutherforth, and after him Dr. Paley, have used the term unlawful, where I 
 have used immoral. The term unlawful does not seem to me to be either suffi- 
 ciently definite or comprehensive. Dr. Rutherforth, indeed, appears to have 
 been sensible of its want of comprehensiveness ; for he says, '* When I speak 
 of unlawful promises, I do not mean those only by which we engage to give or 
 do what the law of nature forbids to be given or to be done by us ; where the 
 matter of a promise is forbidden by any other law, by the positive law of God, 
 for instance, or by the law of the land, or by the commands of our lawful su- 
 periors, as far as they have a right to command us, such a promise is void ; we 
 have done nothing by making it ; and consequently have not obliged ourselves 
 to the performance of it." (Institutes of Natural Law, p. 90.) The term im- 
 moral is here used with reference to the standard of morals established and 
 illustrated in my Preliminary Principles and Discussions, pp. 29-60; to wit, 
 the dictates of conscience, when not disturbed by passion or blinded by prej- 
 udice, and when enlightened and guided by the law of the land, the law of con- 
 sequences (as it may well be called), and the divine law as contained in the 
 Scriptures of the Old and New Testament. 
 
 27 
 
210 THE RELATIVE DUTIES OF MANKIND. [Part III. 
 
 exist, or was not known, at the time of making the promise ; as 
 where a woman gives a promise of marriage, but, before the 
 celebration of the marriage, she discovers that her intended hus- 
 band is too nearly related to her, or that he has a wife yet living. 
 In this class of cases, where the contrary does not appear, it 
 must be presumed, that the parties supposed what was promised 
 to be consistent with good morals, and that the promise pro- 
 ceeded entirely upon this supposition. The morality of the 
 performance, therefore, becomes a condition of the promise, 
 which condition failing, the promise is not binding. 
 
 Further, the tendency, motives, and subject-matter are ele- 
 ments entering too intimately into the nature of a promise to 
 be entirely neglected. Whenever the tendency of the promise 
 is prejudicial to good morals, as seen in the consequences, or 
 made manifest by argument, the promise is not binding ; for the 
 evil tendency and effects impart their own character equally to 
 the promise and the performance. The motives and intentions, 
 too, of the promiser and promisee, or of either of them, and the 
 subject-matter, may be so unmixedly evil, as to contaminate a 
 promise, and render it void. Therefore, a promise to pay a 
 bribe, or to reward the commission of a crime, after the service 
 is rendered, is not binding. So in another case, on which, as 
 well as on these, there has been a difference of opinion. A cer- 
 tain person, in the lifetime of his wife, who was then ill, paid his 
 addresses to another woman, and promised her marriage, in the 
 event of his wife's death. The wife died, and the woman de- 
 manded performance of the promise. The man, who, it seems, 
 had changed his mind, either felt or pretended doubts concern- 
 ing the obligation of a promise made under such circumstances, 
 and referred his case for solution to Bishop Sanderson, who 
 was, at that time, very distinguished for the kind of knowledge 
 required for the solution. Bishop Sanderson, after writing a 
 dissertation upon the question, adjudged the promise to be void. 
 And well he might. For such conduct tends to destroy the 
 sanctity of private life, is inconsistent with the marriage con- 
 tract, and against religion and good morals. To consider such a 
 promise binding is giving encouragement to wrong. Dr. Paley 
 
Chap. V.] OBSERVANCE OF PROMISES. 211 
 
 decides the question the other way,* and attempts to separate the 
 obligation to perform the promise, from the criminal affection 
 which prompted it, and from the immoral tendency of the trans- 
 action. But it seems to me, that the subject-matter, the motives 
 of the parties, and the general tendency, character, and circum- 
 stances of the entire transaction, ought to be viewed in connexion 
 with the question of the performance of the promise, and as in- 
 separable from it. If so, the opinion of Bishop Sanderson must 
 be sustained. All the considerations of public policy are on 
 the side of Bishop Sanderson's decision ; and this is further evi- 
 dence of its soundness. For, considerations of public policy, and 
 the principles of good morals, always coincide, when both are view- 
 ed in all their connexions, tendencies, and influences.! 
 
 A promise cannot be deemed immoral, where it produces, 
 when performed, no effect beyond what would have taken place, 
 had the promise never been made. And this is the single case, 
 in which the obligation of a promise will justify a course of con- 
 duct, which, unless it had been promised, would have been un- 
 justifiable. A captive may rightfully recover his freedom by a 
 promise of neutrality ; for his conqueror gains nothing by the 
 promise, which he might not have secured by his confinement ; 
 and neutrality will be innocent in him, although unjustifiable in 
 another. It is manifest, however, that promises which are sub- 
 stituted in the place of coercion, can extend no further than to 
 passive compliances, for coercion itself could compel no more. 
 
 Upon the same principle, promises of secrecy, in certain cases, 
 ought not to be violated, although the public might derive ad- 
 vantage from the disclosure. Such promises contain nothing 
 in them which ought to destroy or impair their obligation ; for, 
 as the information would not have been imparted upon any other 
 condition, the public lose nothing by the promise, which they 
 would have gained without it. This applies to the relation sub- 
 
 * Moral and Political Philosophy, p. 78. 
 
 t The views contained in this paragraph are fully sustained by the analogies 
 of the purest branches of the law. See Story on " Constructive Fraud," in his 
 "Commentaries on Equity Jurisprudence," pp. 290-324. And again, in his 
 " Conflict of Laws," pp. 204, 209, 210, 213-215. This learned author seems 
 to omit no fair occasion to bring into notice and enforce the morals of the law. 
 
212 THE RELATIVE DUTIES OF MANKIND. [Part III. 
 
 sisting between a lawyer and his client, a confessor and the per- 
 son confessing, both of which relations are highly confidential. 
 
 Many writers on morals have laid down the position, that, 
 where a perfect and an imperfect obligation clash, the perfect 
 obligation is to be preferred. For this opinion, however, there 
 seems to be no good reason, — the terms perfect and imperfect, 
 cannot justify such a distinction. The distinction between du- 
 ties of perfect and imperfect obligation, is a legal and technical, 
 rather than a moral distinction. The former may be enforced 
 by law, the latter must be left to the conscience of each indi- 
 vidual. The moral philosopher looks at them both from the 
 same elevated point of view. The specific performance, there- 
 fore, of promises of every kind, so far as they are binding at all, 
 is a perfect obligation. For, as the reason of the rule applies to 
 all obligations, imperfect as well as perfect, the rule, that promises 
 are void where the performance is immoral, extends to imper- 
 fect as much as to perfect obligations. Thus, if you promise a 
 man your vote, and, between the time of promise and perform- 
 ance, he renders himself unfit to receive it, you are absolved 
 from the obligation of your promise. Or if it be a case, in 
 which you are bound, by oath or other obligation, to govern 
 yourself by the qualifications of the candidates, and a candidate of 
 higher qualifications appears, the promise must be broken through.* 
 
 If the matter of a promise is impossible or immoral at the 
 time of making it, but the circumstances are such as may be 
 changed, and a change in the promiser's circumstances may 
 render it possible, or consistent with good morals, for him to 
 perform his promise at some time hereafter, it is binding. The 
 meaning of the promiser at the time must have been this, — 
 that he would give the thing or do the act promised, whenever 
 it should be in his power, or whenever, by any change in his 
 circumstances, it should become consistent with good morals. 
 The obligation of such promises, in the mean time, is in suspense, 
 but is revived when the event happens which renders the per- 
 formance of them possible or moral. f 
 
 * Paley's Moral and Political Philosophy, p. 76- 79. 
 t Rutherforth's Institutes of Natural Law, p. 91. 
 
Chap. V.] OBSERVANCE OF PROMISES. 213 
 
 Again, a promise is a personal concern, and the obligations of 
 a man's promise do not descend to his heirs. Promises are obli- 
 gations upon his person only, — they do not affect his property. 
 All obligations, which reach no farther than the person of the 
 promiser, cease with his person. And, since the obligations of 
 promises are of this sort, it is matter of liberality and indulgence 
 only, when the heir to an estate undertakes to make good the 
 promises of his ancestor.* 
 
 Moreover, it may be well to recommend a caution, to young 
 persons especially, from the neglect of which many have involved 
 themselves in embarrassment and disgrace ; that is, never to 
 give a promise which may in any event interfere with their duty. 
 For, if it so interferes, their duty must be discharged, though at 
 the expense of their promise, and usually, in a measure, of their 
 reputation, f 
 
 Finally, when a promise is made to God, it is called a vow. 
 The use of vows occurs occasionally in the Scriptures ; Moses 
 enacted several laws for the regulation and execution of them. 
 " When thou shalt vow a vow unto the Lord thy God," says he, 
 w thou shalt not slack to pay it ; for the Lord thy God will surely 
 require it of thee ; and it would be sin in thee. But, if thou shalt 
 forbear to vow, it shall be no sin in thee." J We have instances 
 of vows too, in the New Testament. § The practice of mak- 
 ing vows, therefore, finds authority, if not direct encouragement, 
 in the Old and New Testament. They partake also, in some 
 measure, of the nature of oaths, and their influence in strength- 
 ening and perpetuating good intentions and resolutions seems 
 manifest. The violation of them is sinful, as it implies a want of 
 reverence and regard to the Supreme Being. We may conclude 
 with the wise man ; " When thou vowest a vow unto God, 
 defer not to pay it ; for he hath no pleasure in fools (that is, 
 rash and vain persons) ; pay that which thou hast vowed. 
 Better is it that thou shouldst not vow, than that thou shouldst 
 vow and not pay." [| 
 
 * Rutherforth's Institutes of Natural Law, p. 90. 
 
 t Paley's Moral and Political Philosophy, p. 77. 
 
 J Deut. xxiii. 21, 22. § Acts xviii. 18 ; xxi. 23. || Eccl. v. 4, 5. 
 
214 THE RELATIVE DUTIES OF MANKIND. [Part III. 
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 
 OBSERVANCE OF CONTRACTS. 
 
 A contract has been defined to be, the assent of two or 
 more minds to the same thing. The minds of both parties, it is 
 said, must be brought to act upon the same subject-matter, and 
 must concur in opinion respecting it. But by a definition better 
 suited to my purpose, because more easily applied, and capable 
 of a more distinct and easy analysis, a contract is a mutual prom- 
 ise. Hence, contracts, in respect to their obligation, to the sense 
 in which they are to be interpreted, and the cases in which they 
 are not binding, are subject to the same rules as promises. 
 
 From the principles before established, that the obligation of 
 promises is to be measured by the expectation which the prom- 
 iser in any way, voluntarily and knowingly, excites, * results the 
 rule, which (in foro conscientice) governs the construction of all 
 contracts, and which is capable, from its simplicity, of being ap- 
 plied with great ease and certainty ; to wit, that whatever is ex- 
 pected by one party, and Tcnown to be so expected by the other, 
 is to be deemed, a part or condition of the contract, f But as 
 contracts are so much more the object of municipal law, than of 
 moral philosophy, I shall not dwell much upon them. A few 
 general observations, however, relative to the connexion between 
 law and morals, and their respective bearing on each other, so far 
 as this subject is concerned, may be useful. 
 
 1. There is a gratifying and instructive coincidence between 
 the rules of Christian morals, and the rules and doctrines of the 
 law, in regard to contracts. ec No man can be heard in a court of 
 justice, to enforce a contract founded in, or arising from, moral or 
 political turpitude." Again, " As far as it can be enforced by 
 human sanctions, the rule of the municipal law is identical with 
 the golden precept taught by Christianity, of doing to others as 
 
 * See pp. 202, 204. t Paley's Moral and Political Philosophy, p. 83. 
 
Chap. VI.] OBSERVANCE OF CONTRACTS. 215 
 
 we would that they should do to ourselves." Moreover, " Where 
 the law cannot separate the honest from the fraudulent parts of 
 any transaction, it provides for its own imbecility, by sternly re- 
 pudiating the whole."* 
 
 By the rule of the common law, if there be an intentional con- 
 cealment or suppression of material facts in the making of a con- 
 tract, in cases in which both parties have not equal access to the 
 means of information, it will be deemed unfair dealing, and will 
 vitiate and avoid the contract. There may be some difference in 
 the facility with which the rule applies, between facts and circum- 
 stances that are intrinsic, and form material ingredients of the 
 contract, and those that are extrinsic, and form no component 
 part of it ; though they create inducements to enter into the:, 
 contract, or affect the price of the article. 
 
 As a general rule, each party is bound, in every case, to com- 
 municate to the other his knowledge of material facts, provided 
 he knows the other to be ignorant of them, and they be not open 
 and naked, or equally within the reach of his observation. Thus, 
 in the sale of a ship which had a latent defect known to the seller, 
 and which the buyer could not by any attention possibly discover, 
 the seller was held to be bound to disclose it, and the conceal- 
 ment was justly considered to be a breach of honesty and good 
 faith. So, if one party suffers the other to buy an article under 
 a delusion created by his own conduct, it will be deemed fraud- 
 ulent and fatal to the contract ; — ■ as, if the seller, by his acts, 
 produces an impression upon the mind of the buyer, that he is 
 purchasing a picture belonging to a person of great skill in paint- 
 ing, which the seller knows not to be the fact, and yet suffers 
 the impression to remain, though he knows it materially enhances 
 the value of the picture in the mind of the buyer. The seller 
 must not practise any artifice to conceal defects, or make any 
 representations for the purpose of throwing the buyer off his 
 guard. 
 
 The same principle was declared by Lord Hardwicke, when 
 he stated, that, if a vendor, knowing of an incumbrance upon an 
 estate, sells without disclosing the fact, and with knowledge that 
 
 * Story, Conflict of Laws, p. 204. — Manuscript Lecture of Simon Green- 
 leaf, Esq., Royall Professor of Law in Harvard University. 
 
216 THE RELATIVE DUTIES OF MANKIND. [Part III. 
 
 the purchaser is a stranger to it, and under representations in- 
 ducing him to buy, he acts fraudulently, and violates integrity and 
 fair dealing. The inference of fraud is easily and almost inevi- 
 tably drawn, when there is a suppression or concealment of 
 material circumstances, and one of the contracting parties is 
 knowingly suffered to deal under a delusion. 
 
 So, the selling an unsound article for a sound price, knowing 
 it to be unsound, is actionable. It is equivalent to the conceal- 
 ment of a latent defect. The same rule applies to the case 
 where a party pays money in ignorance of circumstances with 
 which the receiver is acquainted, and does not disclose, and 
 which, if disclosed, would have prevented the payment. In 
 that case, the parties do not deal on equal terms ; and the money 
 is held to be unfairly obtained, and repayment may be compelled. 
 It applies also to the case, where a person takes a guaranty from 
 a surety, and conceals from him facts which go to increase his 
 risk, and suffers him to enter into the contract under false im- 
 pressions. Such concealment is held to be fraud, and vitiates 
 the contract. 
 
 But, if the defects in the article sold, are open equally to the 
 observation of both parties, the law does not require the vendor 
 to aid and assist the observation of the vendee. Even a warran- 
 ty will not cover defects that are plainly the objects of the senses ; 
 though if the vendor says or does any thing whatever, with an 
 intention to divert the eye, or obscure the observation, of the 
 buyer, even in relation to open defects, he will be guilty of an act 
 of fraud. An inference of fraud may be made, not only from 
 deceptive assertions and false representations, but from facts, 
 incidents, and circumstances, which may be trivial in themselves, 
 but decisive evidence, in the given case, of a fraudulent design. 
 
 When, however, the means of information relative to facts and 
 circumstances affecting the value of the commodity, are equally 
 accessible to both parties, and neither of them does or says any 
 thing tending to impose on the other, the disclosure of any supe- 
 rior knowledge which one party may have over the other, as to 
 those facts and circumstances, is not requisite to the validity of a 
 contract. There is no breach of any implied confidence, that 
 one party will not profit by his superior knowledge, as to facts 
 
Chap. VI.] OBSERVANCE OF CONTRACTS. 217 
 
 and circumstances open to the observation of both parties, or 
 equally within the reach of their ordinary diligence ; because 
 neither party reposes in any such confidence, unless it be special- 
 ly tendered or required. Each one, in ordinary cases, judges 
 for himself, and relies upon the sufficiency of his own knowledge, 
 skill, and diligence. 
 
 The common law affords to every one reasonable protection 
 against fraud in dealing, but it does not go to the romantic length 
 of giving indemnity against the consequences of indolence and 
 folly, or of careless indifference to the ordinary and accessible 
 means of information. It reconciles the claims of convenience 
 with the duties of good faith, to every extent compatible with the 
 interests of commerce ; meaning by the term commerce, every 
 kind of ordinary intercourse in the way of business transactions. 
 
 This it does, by requiring the purchaser to apply his attention 
 to those particulars which may be supposed within the reach of 
 his observation and judgment ; and the vendor to communicate 
 those particulars and defects which cannot be supposed to be im- 
 mediately within the reach of such attention.* Chancellor Kent 
 is of the opinion, that the common law has carried the doctrine 
 of disclosures by each party in the formation of the contract of 
 sale, to every reasonable and practicable extent, that is consistent 
 with the interests of society. f cc The only difference " (in 
 regard to disclosures) "between writers on the highest branches 
 of the moral law, and the doctrines of our own judicial tribunals 
 is, that, while both hold it to be the duty of the seller to disclose 
 all the defects or impairing circumstances within his knowledge, 
 the common law, on account of the difficulty of enforcing the rule 
 in all cases, and the disorders it might sometimes occasion in 
 society, draws a line of distinction between circumstances which 
 are open equally to the observation of both parties, and those 
 which are within the knowledge and reach of one alone. The 
 concealment of the latter it punishes." J 
 
 On this subject, the civil law, as stated by the learned and 
 
 * Kent's Commentaries on American Law, Vol. II. pp. 377-380. 
 
 t Idem. Vol. II. p. 384. 
 
 t Manuscript Lecture of Professor Greenleaf, of Harvard University. 
 
 28 
 
218 THE RELATIVE DUTIES OF MANKIND. [Part III. 
 
 accurate Pothier, which is the law of the greatest part of conti- 
 nental Europe, and the basis of the code of Louisiana, is rather 
 more severe in its requisitions, than the common law of England 
 or of the United States. He says, " Although, in many trans- 
 actions of civil society, the rules of good faith only require us to 
 refrain from falsehood, and permit us to conceal from others that 
 which they have an interest in knowing, if we have an equal 
 interest in concealing it from them, yet in interested (pecuniary) 
 contracts, among which is the contract of sale, good faith not 
 only forbids the assertion of falsehood, but all reservation con- 
 cerning that which the person with whom we contract has an 
 interest in knowing, touching the thing which is the subject of 
 the contract."* " In the application of this rule, the same 
 commentator is of opinion, that the seller is obliged to disclose 
 to the buyer every circumstance within his knowledge relating to 
 the subject, which the latter has an interest in knowing ; and that 
 he sins against the good faith which ought to reign in these trans- 
 actions, if he conceals any such circumstances."! 
 
 2. There are, too, some branches of our own law, which, in 
 regard to contracts, are said to be more strictly in conformity 
 with the decisions of an enlightened conscience, than the com- 
 mon law. This is affirmed to be true of equity jurisprudence.^ 
 Yet this superior perfection, claimed in behalf of equity, pertains 
 rather to the means and facilities, which it is permitted to use, in 
 order to attain its end, to the manner in which it grants relief and 
 applies its remedies, and to the extent of its jurisdiction, than to 
 the object at which it aims ; to wit, the attainment of the great- 
 est possible measure of justice and rectitude, — which object is 
 not less the aim of the common law. There are " latent frauds 
 and concealments, which the process of courts of common law 
 is not adapted to reach." The object of equity is, to open the 
 breasts of parties, and " courts of equity address themselves to 
 the conscience of the defendant, and require him to answer, upon 
 his oath, the matters of fact stated in the bill, if they are within 
 
 * Wheaton's Reports, Vol. II. p. 185, note. 
 
 t Manuscript Lecture of Professor Greenleaf, of Harvard University. 
 
 + Kent's Commentaries on American Law, Vol. II. pp. 382-385. 
 
Chap. VI.] OBSERVANCE OF CONTRACTS. 219 
 
 his knowledge ; and he is compellable to give a full account of 
 all such facts, with all their circumstances, without evasion or 
 equivocation." * 
 
 Again, the law of marine insurance is another branch of our 
 law, for which this superior perfection has been claimed. But 
 the contract of insurance is formed upon principles peculiar to 
 itself; and the common-law doctrine of sales, and the doctrine of 
 insurance, are each perfectly consistent with the facts, and the 
 mutual understanding, which they respectively assume. In an 
 insurance contract, an unreserved disclosure of all the circum- 
 stances is required by the nature of the case, and by the mutual 
 understanding of the parties. This will be more fully illustrated 
 by observing, that, in making an insurance contract, the insurer 
 is essentially passive, and is known to act, and professes to act, 
 upon the information of the insured. In this kind of contract, 
 the special facts, upon which the contingent chance is to be 
 computed, lie almost always in the knowledge of the insured 
 only. The insurer trusts to his representation, and proceeds in 
 the confidence, that be does not withhold any circumstance with- 
 in his knowledge. Even if the suppression happens through 
 mistake, and without any intention of fraud on the part of the 
 insured, the policy is void. The common law punishes only for 
 intentional concealment of defects, or silence respecting them, in 
 cases in which information is not equally accessible to both 
 parties. 
 
 The standard of morals, too, set up for the commercial com- 
 munity by the commercial law, is very high. " It is one of the 
 cardinal principles of commercial law, that all its affairs must be 
 conducted with perfect good faiths Again, "It is the aim of 
 all law to secure the observance of good faith in all transactions. 
 The law is said to abhor fraud everywhere, in all its degrees ; — 
 it requires of the suppliant for justice, in any form, that he should 
 approach its altars with clean hands. But, where the necessity for 
 the rule is the most pressing, and the temptations to evade it the 
 most severe, the law, perhaps in compassion to human infirmity, 
 employs the greatest vigilance, and exacts the most inviolate 
 
 * Story's Equity Jurisprudence, V % 
 
 
 
 
 
 ,0 o 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 '+*. 
 
 F 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 3k <& 
 
 
 
 %■ 
 
 
 ' ^ 
 
 
 
 ^ ^ 
 
 ,0o. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 V 1 fl 
 
 * v 
 
 .** 
 
 
 0< 
 
 
 ' * 
 
 
 
 v 
 
 <*\, 
 
 ^ V * 
 
 -V- 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 *o 
 
 0^ 
 
 - ** 
 
 '> ^ 
 
 * *J 
 
 > 
 
 V \V tP 
 
 
 
 
 ■ 
 
 
 
 : <*-, 
 
 
 
 ^ 
 
 I 
 
 
 
 
 
 tf> 
 
 o o x 
 
 
 o 
 
 < J . 
 
 "^ ^ 
 
 
 cP 
 
 -*> 
 
 
 
 
 $■ 
 
 v 
 
 .%*•%> 
 
 
 
 aN 
 
 
 x°°- 
 
 
 
 
 
 A 
 
 
 
 
 
 V>% 
 
 
O U' 
 
 
 
 v^ 
 
 - 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ^ H 
 
 
 
 
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 
 
 022 208 034 4 
 
 ■8S 
 
 ffi Rftl 
 
 Hfitffl H H