xC^< S. M. CARLTON, M. D, HEFDEBSOIT, E "U SK CO., T E X .A. S I2QJH-4 3IIDDLETOWN, N. Y.: G, Beebe's Sons, Publishers, 1884. THE LIBRARY OF CONORStS WASHINGTON ' ' Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1883, by S. M. CARLTON, M.D., in the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington." PBEFACE Fearless of the scrutiny of men or devils, we submit the following treatise to the public, but with much fear and trembling before God, not that we are unable to de- fend the principles as set forth in the ''supposed inter- view," but fearing that our God has never required such a work at our hands. Be this as it may, we have had an abiding impression for about eight years to submit such a work to the public in defence of the doctrine of the Old and New Testament Scriptures, as held to by the Old School or- Primitive Baptists, and in exposition of the various devices, strata- gems and inventions of men, setting forth the multiplied doctrines of Antichrist. We are pained to acknowledge that our manuscript is imperfect ; but we have done the best we could in condensing our thoughts, so as to make ourself understood, without making our work so volumi- nous as not to answer the purpose for which it was in- tended. We have for many years felt the necessity of such a work ; yea, one more able than we have been able to set forth, in defence of the doctrine of Jesus Christ and his Apostles, as held to by all lovers of truth, and in condemnation and answer to those who have a form of godliness, but deny the power thereof. " Having a form 4 PREFACE. of godliness, but denying the power thereof ; from such turn away." — II Tim. iii. 5. How far we have succeeded in meeting this demand, in answering and repulsing the enemies of truth, when they are proposing and propounding hard questions to the humble saints of God, we leave with the humble lovers of truth, asking their prayerful approbation or re- jection. Our first chapter purports to be an interview between Truth and Error ; and at the time of writing said chap- ter, we expected to give our work the title of "Truth versus Error ;" but circumstances changed the title and style of the interview to a supposed interview be- tween the Arminian's God and his Arminian Ministers. Our first chapter being diametrically in opposition to the theory of the popular religious world, and by chance was closely scrutinized by our much esteemed friend, Eobert T. Milner, editor and proprietor of " The Hender- son Times" who insisted that we should submit it to the columns of his excellent paper. We rejected his gratuit- ous offer until we could confer with our much esteemed and talented friend, and now brother, Elder Charles Holcomb, who was and now is Moderator of the Little Hope Association, as to the propriety of such a course, when it was agreed that we submit it for publication in said secular paper, on condition that we be allowed space to defend it should any religious shark presume to strike at it ; whereupon it was published ; and immediately followed the strictures of several will- worshipers and a PREFACE. 5 heated controversy ensued between the Eev. W. H. H. Hays, who is a modern disciple of Andrew Fuller, of Missionary Baptist notoriety, and the humble author of this manual, all of which appears in the first part of our book. After which, the title of our prospective book was changed to a " Diagram of the Churches," in which Diagram we have presumed to disabuse the minds of many of the humble saints of God's electing grace who have been unawares caught in the nets of Antichrist by not understanding the doctrine and tenets of the Primi- tive Baptists, and have been led away by the cunning craftiness of men. "That we henceforth be no more children tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men and cunning craftiness whereby they he in wait to deceive." — Eph. iv. 14. COMPLIMENTARY LETTER. Henderson, Rusk Co., Texas, August 1, 1883. We believe that Dr. S. M. Carlton is actuated by a zeal for, and an ardent desire for the promulgation of the truth of the gospel of Jesus Christ, in the publication of the following work. We have been intimately acquainted with him for several years, and have admired his magnanimous spirit in entertaining and sustaining the people of God. His house has ever been the Christian's home, regardless of sectarianism or creeds ; believing, as he does, that many of the poor afflicted saints have been beguiled, and caught in the nets of Babylon, and are living upon the husks or chaff of Antichrist ; ' ' And he would fain have filled his belly with the husks that the swine did eat ; and no man gave unto him. And when he came to himself, he said, how many hired servants of my father's have bread enough and to spare, and I perish with hunger." — Luke xv. 16, 17. Should the following treatise inspire or give Christian fortitude to any of the starving children of God who are living upon such meager supplies of spiritual food, to come out from the tents of Babylon and enlist under the banner of Jesus Christ and his Apostles, by connecting themselves with the Church of Christ, as well as to inspire others of God's elect or chosen people, who have made no public profession of the Christian's faith, to take up their cross and follow Christ through evil as well as good report, we feel that our brother will be amply compensated for the vast amount of labor and time bestowed upon the work, regardless of the small remuneration that he justly expects in the sale of the book. We have carefully examined his manuscript, and pronounce it COMPLIMENTARY LETTER. I as being novel simple and sublime. He has, in a novel ''interview,'' and with simple allegories and arguments, expounded many of the deep mysteries of godliness, and has wonderfully confounded the devices and doctrines of men. He has reasoned from cause to effect, and from effect to cause, both in expounding the great plan of salvation, as well as the exposition of the doings of Antichrist ; and as far as we are able to judge, he has substantiated all of his arguments and illustrations by a "Thus saith the Lord." It is true that in some instances his illustrations and arguments are not as full as they might have been, or in some instances as they should have been, to put to silence the religious skeptic, or the disguised religious infidel, who has a form of godliness, but denies the power thereof ; nor could he have dwelt upon all the minutiae connected with such a grand commentary, without making the work too large for a convenient household treasure. But the mar. of God, who is an aspirant of truth, who has no other motive than to serve God according to His revealed word and will, will find but few reasons for rejecting any part of his commentary when properly understood. We are made to rejoice in our gratitude to God that He has enabled our brother in a very lucid manner to expound many of the deep things of God for which we have contended for many years from the sacred stand, and have in some instances been opposed by able ministers of the Old School or Primitive Baptists, for want of a proper understanding of us, or for want of a proper understanding of the Scriptures of divine truth. Our dear brother has beautifully harmonized the apparent contradictions (to the casual reader) of the Scriptures, and has thoroughly established, to our minds, God's absolute predestination of all things, both good and evil, and all for His own honor and glory. He has shown beyond cavil why God chose his elect people in Christ before the world began, and did not choose the others ; why God created evil in opposition to good ; the reason why He was compelled to have a hell, in order to have a heaven ; and thajfc he was obliged to have bad men, in order to have good men ; and that good could not exist without its opposite, evil ; and that God controls 8 COMPLIMENTARY LETTER. all things in heaven, earth and hell, and works all things after the counsel of His own will and for His own glory. He makes the wrath of man to praise Him. "We are gratified to acknowledge that our God has been pleased to give our brother light and liberty with his ready pen, to unfold many of the deep mysteries of God that we have never before seen in the writings of man since the days of inspiration, and have but few times heard the whole gospel in its fullness proclaimed from the pulpit. We mean to say that these deep doctrines are usually omitted by our ablest ministers, either from a want of understanding of them, or fearing that they will not be profitable to their congregations. In our indorsement and recommendation of this book to the household of faith and lovers of truth, it is not expected that it will add one member to the body of Christ, but that it will be a source of comfort to the chosen of the Father, the redeemed of the Son, and the quickened of the Holy Spirit. And should there be any Christians so spiritually weak that they cannot comprehend the great truths therein contained, let them not therefore condemn it as being false, but rather pray for our God to give them an understanding of it, so that they may realize the truth of it, and feast upon that spiritual food that will nourish them into spiritual manhood. Eld. CHARLES HOLCOMB. " J. K. HOLCOMB. " NOAH T. FREEMAN. PAST I. TRUTH versus ERROR. By S. M. CARLTON, M. D., OF HENDERSON, TEXAS. Truth. — If God be God, who, or what power is there above Him that can prostrate or thwart His will ? And if He has the will to save the whole human family, He surely has the power to do so, or He ceases to be God, and the creature becomes more powerful than the Creator, in the destruction or salvation of his own soul, and damns or saves his soul by his own acts, regardless of the will of the Father to save him. Therefore God is denied the power to execute His will, and ceases to be Almighty, and does not have all power in earth, hell and heaven ; but is superceded by the handiwork of His own creation and is made subservient to the will of the creature. Error. — But, sir, the salvation of souls is upon con- tingencies. God has made a law that controls the destiny of all men everywhere, and has made man a free-agent ; and he can accept the terms of this law and be saved, or he can reject the terms of the gospel and be damned upon his own volition. Truth. — Allow me to interrupt your temporal thoughts, my friend, and admonish you never to slander the char- 10 TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. acter of God by accusing Him of doing that which you would not do yourself ; for if God foreknew all things, as all orthodox Christians say and believe He does, and if their belief is fully indorsed by the Scriptures, as it is, beyond all cavil, then would not God have been a poor law giver or jurist, to have given into the hands of poor, puny man a law which His foreknowledge knew that man would violate, and therefore damn the objects of His love, whom He so much desired the salvation of ? Now, my friend, you would not be guilty of such a violation of common sense in prescribing a domestic law for the gov- ernment of your natural children, which you knew they would violate, the penalty of which would be corporeal death. Then why accuse God of such an outrage upon His legal dignity, robbing Him of the salvation of the souls that He so much desires to save, and that He could not save, without it happens to suit the person or persons whom He desires to save, and that upon their own voli- tion? Error. — Well, then, if God does not save the people upon a principle of free-agency, and upon their own voli- tion, how do you reconcile the justice of God in suffering any to be lost ? Truth. — They are lost upon a principle of justice, and that justice is based upon the fact that the heirs of per- dition ( in a spiritual sense ) are not God's. They come from the infernal regions, and they will return to Satan, the author of their spiritual existence. And in like manner the heirs of promise will return to Christ in heaven, TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. 11 from whence they came, who is the author of their spiri- tual existence. " And the ransomed of the Lord shall return, [not may] and come to Zion with songs and ever- lasting joy upon their heads : they shall obtain joy and gladness, and sorrow and sighing shall flee away." — Isa. xxxv. 10. And I take it for granted that persons, things or spirits cannot return to places where they have not been. And the heirs of promise were all chosen in Christ before the foundation of the world, and their names were all written in the Lamb's Book of lif e ; and should any of this number apostatize and fail to be there at the final consummation of all things, God would be disappointed for want of ability to save them, and the body of Christ would be incomplete, and the Son could justly prosecute the Father for failure of contract, in that of not render- ing to him value received for that which he had bought with his blood and life, which price he had paid accord- ing to contract at the appointed time. And should there be others there who were not embraced in the covenant, Christ would surely reject them, as his body and contract would be complete without them ; and he surely would not presume to claim that which was not his by covenant and redemption. It is therefore reasonable to suppose, from common sense, as well as from inference, admitting that the Scriptures were silent upon this subject, that all who were not embraced in this covenant were heirs of perdition, and that their spiritual existence hailed from the underworld, and must by right return from whence they came. " Ye are of your father the devil, and the 13 TRITH VEESrS ERROR. lusts of your father ye will do/' oc: — John viii. ±±. But from the character of Christ we could not presume that he would wantonly cheat Satan out of his dues ; but the character of Satan would swindle Christ out of his. and would deceive the very elect if it were possible. — Mark xiii. '2-2. But Christ knows them that are his, and they shall come unto him. and none shall be able to pluck them, vice— John x. i7. 28, 29. Error. — Bur. sir. it seems that God would be unjust nake a part of the human family - inned. and ren and happinesa Truth. — Be this as i: may. none dare say that God did not have the power B them if He had the will. Suppose we say that the family of perdition stood con- in the mind of r ah before all worlds were. and spiritual e:: was virtually in the : Sfi fore God spoke irr -rence their natural angs, and th I made them for the v purpose : nded for them. and that without them he could not have shown his wis- dom. ■;. and goodn the children of mercy : for the terms "good" and "h " would have been rms. without meaning, if they had not had their oppo si fces, '" and "hell:" and God was compelled, ::y natm-e of tilings, to create inhabit- ants for both conditions and plac the creation of snch conditions and places would have been wholly un- necessary. Error.— Well. sir. is not one man as good by nature - TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. 13 another ? And why does God choose one of His creation as a vessel of mercy, and leave another without a chance for heaven and happiness ? And why is the gospel com- manded to be preached to all men everywhere ? Truth. — The preaching of the gospel indiscriminately to all men, is for the purpose of supplying his vessels of mercy with spiritual food, and is for the further purpose of confounding the brain religion of the mighty and wise of Antichrist, leaving Satan and his spiritual progeny without excuse, that they may not plead ignorance in the day of final retribution ; thereby making their own con- demnation more complete. For it is written, that God caused certain parties to believe a he, that they might be damned. "And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a he : that they all might be damned who believe not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness." — 2 Thes. ii. 11, 12 ; also, see 1 Kings xxii. Showing conclusively that God did not want them in heaven, for the reason that they did not belong to the heavenly family of Christ ; but God did have a use for them on earth, or He would not have created them. And we all agree that men are by nature the same ; but it is written, ( in speaking to the heirs of promise,) "Among whom also we all had our conversa- tion in times past, in the lusts of our flesh, f ulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind, and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others. But God, who is rich in mercy, for His great love wherewith He loved us, even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us to- 14 TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. gether with Christ, ( by grace ye are saved )," &c. — Eph. ii. 3, 4, 5. But it cannot be shown upon Bible authority that they are the others, or any part of them. And so far as not giving them a chance for heaven and happiness is con- cerned, it camiot be proven upon Bible testimony that one of this class has e*ver wanted to be saved, only upon their own terms, and their terms have ever been in direct opposition to the terms of heaven. Therefore all their good works and good deeds are rejected, as they are claiming heaven and happiness upon their own merited goodness, instead of the merits of Christ. But the family of heaven, when they are quickened in- to spiritual life, and made to see what they are by nature, and what they must be by grace before they can be saved, are then ready to say in their contrition and humility, "Thy will be done, God, and not mine ;" and in the midst of their guilt they would be ready to say, "Amen," at then own condemnation. And so far as choice is concerned, God chooses the heirs of promise because they are His, and does not choose them to make them His ; and He rejects the heirs of per- dition because they are not His. All are His by creation, but not by adoption. - Error. — This doctrine seems to put the people upon the stool of do-nothing ; for if they are to be saved, they will be saved anyhow, and therefore license the people in wick- edness. Truth.— We deny the charge, and claim that every TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. 15 man is a moral agent, and that the people of Antichrist was raised in the fall of Adam from their degradation in hell (in a spiritual sense), to a level with the heirs of promise (in a natural sense), who were in Christ spirit- ually before the world was. And both families shook hands, as it were, in the persons of Adam and Eve, nat- urally and morally. Therefore our natural pride of char- acter, and our moral obligations to God and to each other, are identical. And the people of perdition should not accuse God of injustice, but should render praise unto Him, for having elevated them to a moral status in this life with the family of Christ ; and at their death their spirits will return from whence they came, and no charge can be laid to God for injustice. But, on the other hand, those that die in the triumphs of a living faith, their spirits will take their everlasting flight, and will repose in Christ, from whence they came ; and no charge is laid at the hands of God by them, for causing them to come down from heaven and partake of the nature of the child- ren of wrath, and become like them temporally and mor- ally ; but they rejoice in the hope of their spirits return- ing to reunite with Christ in heaven. But to explain our temporal and spiritual existence more fully, we will say that all the heavenly family were in Christ spiritually before man was created, and that God made man in the likeness of his own image. " And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness," &c— Gen. i. 26. Of course the humanity of Jesus Christ was present with God, and was the temple of the Spirit of God, form- 16 TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. ing the unity of the Father, Son and Spirit ; and as man could not have been made like a spirit, he was made after the image of Jesus corporally. So we conclude that the humanity of Christ was ever present with God, and that it makes all the changes that Divinity is so often accused of making. Man ( together with all things else that were created) was pronounced good, and very good. "And God saw every thing that he had made ; and, behold, it was very good. " — Gen. i. 31. So there could not have been any latent evil or innate principle of sin in Adam at that time, or he could not have been good, and very good : but there did exist in his loins the natural germs of the spiritual family of Christ ; so that when Adam trans- gressed the command of God, this spiritual family of heaven fell down to a level with the family of Antichrist, and the family of Antichrist was promoted from the depths of hell to a moral status with the people of God ; for which they should render God praise and homage in this life, for the enjoyments of its temporal blessings. Hence the Scripture, " For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive." — 1. Cor.xv. 22. The ran- somed of the Lord were all that were in Adam ( in a spiritual sense ) at the time of his transgression ; so Christ died for all that fell in Adam, as Adam at that time was not contaminated with the wicked principles of Satan, as he was not yet denied but was made susceptible ( to- gether with Eve ) to the conception and germination of the children of wrath, in a spiritual sense. The devil being deceitful and cunning, he confronted the woman, and she TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. 17 sinned against the command of God ; and Adam loved her, ( as Christ loved his bride, the church, which church the woman typifies,) and died to the love of holiness, and was made alive to the love of sin, by partaking of her sins, that he might live with her. And in like manner Christ loved his bride, the church, and took upon himself a body of flesh and blood, and died naturally or corporally for the justification of his chosen vessels of mercy, who fell in Adam. Hence we see that the tares were sown with the wheat ; and never until this sin, were Adam and Eve capable of the conception and germination of the children of perdition • for the spiritual germs did not exist in them, as they were free from sin, or they could not have been good. So was the field free from tares when the wheat was sown ; but there came an enemy afterwards, and sowed tares with the wheat. And as Adam and Eve re- present the field, the heirs of promise were sown in them first, and afterwards the serpent sowed the seed of Satan in them. And as wheat and tares grow together in the same field, or soil, from the same culture, so in like man- ner do the heirs of promise and the heirs of perdition, conceive, germinate and mature from the same natural parents. See the allegories of Cain and Abel, Isaac and Ishmael, Jacob and Esau. Error. — Well, sir, if that doctrine be true, a man can execute all the wickedness that his mind can conceive, and if he is to be saved he will be saved anyhow, and there is no use in his trying to do good. And if I believ- ed as you do, I would live on the fat of the land, regard- less of how I become in possession of it. 18 TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. Truth. — Providence has wisely put it into the minds of all men to believe that there is a chance for them in- dividually to be saved ; even the heirs of perdition believe alike with the heirs of promise (prior to regeneration ) that they will be or can be saved upon legal principles, and are ever trying to court the favor of God upon law principles, hoping to bring God under obligations to save them. And what a wise provision in God's eternal purposes, and how moralizing in its tendencies, for man not to know that he is doomed to hell by the eternal decrees of heaven ; for if not an heir of promise, the positive injunction must be that he is an heir of per- dition ; for there are but two ways and two conditions — right and wrong, heaven and hell. And God's foreknowl- edge comprehended all the situations before all worlds were, or he ceases to be almighty and allwise, and only knows things as they take place, like as you and I. We cannot dishonor God by limiting His knowledge ; if we do, the whole foundation of the Christian religion is a failure, and infidelity predominates over Christ and his cause. The Apostolic or Primitive Baptists have never taught nor preached the doctrine that "If I am to be saved, I will be saved anyhow." They preach a doctrine that exactly accords with the teachings of the word of God ; that all that ever have been, are now, or ever will be saved, were saved in the eternal mind of Jehovah be- fore the world began ; and that in the covenant of redemp- tion between the Father and the Son, their names were all written in the Lamb's book of life before the foundation TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. 19 of the world ; and that it is as much impossible for one name to be blotted out, or another to be added thereto, as it would be for human ingenuity to blot out or dislo- cate any of the astronomical bodies ; and that the whole fixedness of purpose in the mind of God in the salvation of His vessels of mercy is, if possible, more positive than the evolutions of the luminaries of day and night ; or else God is mocked in His foreknowledge and eternal purposes, and religion is nothing more than a mental delusion, and is based upon the fabric of a vision, and is therefore noth- ing but chance and speculation. God does not work by chance, but does all things by positive commands — "I will, and you shall." He does not say, I will save you if you will let me ; nor that you can be saved upon your own volition if you will ; neither are the Old and New Testaments addressed to any except the vessels of mercy in a spiritual sense, but are addressed to the whole human family in a moral sense ; hence the human family are making a great effort to save themselves, by living up to the moral teachings of the Scriptures, and are substitut- ing the commandments and institutions of men for the blood of Christ, and are very zealous, apparently, in ask- ing God to bless their so-called Christian institutions to the salvation of their children, etc., and claim that God has enjoined it upon them, that their children may be raised up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord ; that the teaching thereof is a stepping-stone to the Christian religion, and that by degrees the young mind and heart is so wrought upon by the teachings of these institutions 20 TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. that they soon become fit subjects, spiritually, for the church of Christ. what self-aggrandizement ! and how God-dishonoring is such a theory of religious fanaticism and disguised infidelity ! And so far as your living on the fat of the land is con- cerned, all regenerated men and women, in their convic- tion and convertion, are killed to the love of sin, and can- not five any longer therein. They do not want to steal, murder, commit adultery, swindle, cheat, defraud, etc., etc. And you have tacitly acknowledged that you would do all of these evils if you were not afraid of the devil and hell ; and all regenerated Christians give you credit for honesty in acknowledging that you are only serving God through fear, and not through love, as the Christian serves Him. And the Christian knows full well that you have never been killed to the love of sin, and made alive to the love of righteousness, or you would not utter such epithets against the Christian religion. We would respectfully refer self-willed Christians to the 18th and 19th verses of the last chapter of Eevelation, and ask them to read carefully and see if they are adding any- thing in these latter days to the prophecies and commands of God and his Christ ; and if so, what will be their re- ward ? We would further ask if they are not committing a great sin of presumption, in presuming upon the ignor- ance of God and his Christ, as being incompetent to the task of revealing and having transmitted to writing in the sacred volume of truth, by inspired men of God, their will concerning the human family, and especially con- TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. 21 cerning the heirs of promise. Yet in open rebellion to the teachings of the verses referred to, we find many de- flections and innovations upon these solemn injunctions, and great stress is put upon the teachings of these self- willed, so-called Christian institutions, for which there cannot be found in the sacred volume a " Thus saith the Lord ;" and yet they are much revered by the popular religious world ; asking God in all their petitions, with much zeal and eloquence of speech, to honor and bless their institutions to the conversion of poor, lost sinners, and to the pulling down of the strongholds of Satan, and rearing these self-willed institutions in their stead ; when God nor his Christ have ever commanded or required any such things at the hands of his chosen people. And it is a direct accusation upon the character of God to suppose that he would have left anything undone or that He would have failed through His inspired writers to have penned down any part of His will concerning the people of His choice, or elect family. Hence the true people of God are not engaged in such deflections and innovations upon the revealed word of God, but content themselves by try- ing to do that which is written ; no more, no less. And they are much chagrined and mortified at times in not being able to live as near the pattern of Christ as they would wish to ; but when they have nearly desponded over their sins of commission and omission, they are cheered up by a recital of the experience of "Paul," when he said that the things that he would not do, them he did; and that the things that he would do, them he did not ; 22 TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. hence it was no more him that sinned but sin that dwelt in him. Many similar expressions of this able defender of God's holy will cause the poor, humble follower of Christ to press forward to the mark of the high calling of God and His Christ, regardless of all the buff etings and derision of the self-willed popular religion of the day. We would say to our friendly opposers ( many of whom we believe to be regenerated souls, but from the fact of bad religious tuition are in Babylon,) that the church of Christ in its purity is the " covering grip" to all the self- willed charitable institutions that have ever been insti- tuted by man, and is the substance of all their typical shadows in the shape of human so-called Christian insti- tutions. And if the regenerated soul is in possession of the substance of the Christian religion, and feels the wit- ness within him, speaking peace to his soul, why could he cling to, or what use would he have for, the shadow ? Old things are done away and all things are become new with them. They then depend upon the grace of God for salvation, and give up all then works of righteousness ; and they know full well that the works of others, with all their boasted institutions of TJieology, Charity, Mis- sionary Operations, Hirelings to carry the gospel to the heathen, ( who, they claim, are dying and going to hell for want of the gospel,) will never save a single soul from hell, nor add one to the redeemed family of God's vessels of mercy. The people of God are positively commanded to come out from the world, and it is enjoined upon them TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. 23 to be a separate and distinct people. The Old Baptists pro- pose to do this. No more, no less. They are not allowed to affiliate with the institutions of the world, and the in- stitution of Christ at the same time ; serving G-od and Mammon at the same time ; running with the hare and holding with the hounds. All they crave is to serve God and not the world. They do not propose to do the insti- tutions of man any violence, but they do propose to pre- serve the church of Christ according to God's pattern. Among whatever nation, kindred or tongue God has a people, He is able to raise up a ministry who will pro- claim the glad tidings of His rich and free grace, through the mediation of Christ, to the conviction, conversion and regeneration of all that chosen people whose lot may be cast among the heathen, and that without money and without price, and without the vain foibles of self -exalted Antichrist, with all of his allurements and auxiliaries in helping God to save souls that God and his Christ have already saved before all worlds were. For in the fullness of God's time Christ made his advent into the world and paid the price of redemption, according to previous agree- ment with the Father and the Son. The covenanted children being the component members of Christ's body, and being in Christ, and Christ being in God, therefore the regenerated part of man, being in Christ, and Christ being in God, and the regenerated part of man being of the Spirit of God, and necessarily merges back into God, through the mediation of Christ, how is it possible for any part or parcel of the redeemed family of heaven ever to 24 TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. be lost ? or how is it possible for the ingenuity of all the soul-saving machinery of men, with all their hirelings and money, ever to add one soul to the number of Christ's. Church, or body, without defacing the body, or church of Christ ? This being done, God would in part be the author of His own destruction, in that of destroying Himself, or a part thereof, and would deface the church of Christ, and the body of His only begotten Son, who is equal with the Father, if He were to allow one of this heavenly throng to be disinherited upon the theory of absurd apostasy, based upon free moral agency, and would violate a solemn contract with His Son. Such a theory is nothing more than religious romance, and is im- possible. Error. — But, sir, do not the Old and New Testaments abound with the laws of Moses and other inspired writers, commanding the people everywhere, in the name of God, to repent and obey the gospel, or law, and be saved, with the positive injunction that if they do not, they will be lost ? Now, sir, what does all this mean, if we can do nothing in effecting our own everlasting salvation ? And do you suppose, sir, that God would have been silly enough to have given such a law and then made it impos- sible for man to have kept it ? This, sir, seems to make God the author of sin, and is a direct accusation upon the justice of God, in that of sending souls to hell without giving them any chance for heaven and happiness ; when, at the same time, He made them and ushered them into existence without their consent, seemingly to get a TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. 25 chance to send them to hell. Now, sir, I cannot conceive of a principle in the character of God that would wan- tonly commit such treason against His own law and justice, and I cannot, will not, believe such extravagant views of God's justice. Truth. — The word of God will answer your interroga- tions. "The Lord hath made all things for himself; yea, even the wicked for the day of evil," — Pro v. xvi. 4, and you dare not reply against God. " Nay, but, man, who art thou that repliest against God ? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, why hast thou made me thus ? Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honor and another unto dishonor ? What if God, willing to show his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much long suffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction ; and that He might make known the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy, which He had afore prepared unto glory; even us, whom He hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles ?"— Eom. ix. 20-24. Now, sir, if you reject the testimony of God, written by inspiration, under the auspices of God, how could I, a poor, puny atom of his creation, expect to control lan- guage that would be sufficient to cause you to believe the truth? And until the wisdom and light of the Holy Spirit accompanies the arguments of the people that are taught of God, they would not expect to succeed in con- vincing the natural mind of man in its unregenerated condition. See what Paul says : " But the natural man 26 TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God ; for they are f oolishness unto him ; neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned." — I Cor. ii. 14. Allow me to say to you, my friend, that you will never believe the truth until you are made able by the teachings of the Holy Spirit to discern between law and grace ; for the natural man cannot discern the things of the Spirit ; they are foolishness to him ; he is not a subject of the law of grace, neither indeed can he be, until he is spiritually taught. When the Christian is made alive to the law of grace, he is elevated above the law of reason, and is made alive to the law of divinity ; hence there is a perfect turning about in his manner of reasoning. He now reasons upon natural things, from natural laws, and from natural attributes ; and he reasons upon divine things from divine laws, and divine attributes ; the difference be- tween which he was never able to see until he was made alive to the love of Christ as his Savior. This we know is f oolishness to the unconverted ; but the word of God and our own experience teach the same great truth. And we here assert (knowing that the Bible will bear us out in the position) that you had as well undertake to mix oil and water, as to mix law and grace. Law is of natural origin ; grace is of divine origin. Law is the perfection of human reason and human wisdom ; grace is the perfection of divine reason and divine wisdom. The votaries of the law will be saved in this world, as nations, communities and individuals, The votaries of TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. 27 grace will be saved indiscriminately, among all nations, kindreds and tongues, in the world to come. And the votaries of law, who are not the subjects of grace, will be lost indiscriminately in the world to come. Necessarily the whole human family are the subjects of law, while the ransomed of the Lord are only the sub- jects of grace. If the whole human family could be made votaries of the law, and not violators of the law, then the law would be the perfection of human morals, human society, human intercoiirse, etc., but would not save a soul from hell. Grace is not only the perfection of divine reason, but its votaries are the perfection of God's foreknowledge, the perfection of God's eternal purposes, the perfection of the Christian religion, the perfection of Christ and his church, and will be executed, and cannot be blended with law in the final salvation of souls ; therefore the votaries of Christ are above the law, and are not subjects of the law in a spiritual sense, but are subjects of grace ; therefore the regenerated part of the human family are subject to the laws that be, but are above the law, being a law unto themselves ; for they are taught of God. " For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of His good pleasure." — Phil. ii. 13. Then they have no desire to violate the laws that be, nor the laws of grace. Law, in olden times, as at present, was for the govern- ment of the nations, and the subjugation and control of 30 TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. misery ; the other to eternal happiness. One of the ways emanates from the spirit of Antichrist ; the other ema- nates from the Spirit and eternal purposes of God. Much of the law in olden times was of divine origin, and was given by divine command, and of necessity must apply to saints as well as sinners ; for God is not a respecter of persons in a national and law sense, and all must be sub- ject to the same law. ' ' Because the law worketh wrath ; for where no law is, there is no transgression." — Eom. iv. 15. "And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand." — Mark hi. 25. So there must be unison or harmony in this law. And the law that was given by inspiration or command of God, is just as holy as God is holy. And as there is no perfection in human nature, who can keep a law that is perfection ? " Yea, let God be true, but every man a liar." — Eom. hi. 4. So, if our eternal salvation depended upon the keeping of this just and holy law, all men would be eternally lost. "There is none good but one, that is God." — Mat. xix. 17. " For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth." — Eom. x. 4. So Christ has paid the penalty of this law for all that fell under this law, and has raised them above this law, and has placed them where they originally stood in Christ spiritually before the law was given to them. Hence they are above the law in a spiritual sense, but are subjects, together with the spiritual progeny of Satan, to the laws of the nation or community of which they are citizens ; which law, as it now stands, purports to have been based upon the letter of this holy law. TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. 31 Some will be violators and some votaries of this law among all nations, and some will be votaries of grace among all nations, from the fact of this knowledge hav- ing been and will be communicated to them through the medium of the Holy Spirit. But all are required or ex- pected to keep the law that governs the nation or country of which they are citizens, from the fact that it is taught by the letter and spirit of literature, and not by the Spirit of God. And the violators of this law must suffer its penalties, on the theory that all men are familiar with the laws of their own country. " Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no re- specter of persons." — Acts x. 34. Hence God has elected His vessels of mercy from among all nations, and does not respect the nation to which they belong, and inspires them at His own appointed time with the knowledge of His love. "The Lord hath appeared of old unto me, saying, Yea, I have loved thee with an everlasting love ; therefore with loving-kindness have I drawn thee." — Jer. xxxi. 3. The spiritual progeny of Satan did not fall under this law in the transgression of our primitive parents, from the fact that they had not been up anywhere to fall, but were raised from their degradation with their spiritual father, Satan, to the moral teachings of the law ; and like their fountain, they cannot rise above their level ; they must stay with their spiritual father, Satan. " Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and 32 TRUTH VERSUS ERROR. abode not in the truth ; because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a he, he speaketh of his own ; for he is a liar, and the father of it." — John viii. 44. Our ancient brethren, who lived in the prophetic and law dispensation, looked forward to the coming of the Messiah as their Savior, and were governed by this holy law ; while the modern Christian, who lives under the Christian era, or new dispensation, is content to live in accordance with the pattern of Christ ; Jesus Christ hav- ing come into the world, not to destroy or do away with the law, but to fulfill the law ; hence Christ is the end of the law, having fulfilled the law, (Rom. x. 4,) and is now to the modern Christian the law ; and all true Christians are now governed by the examples and commands of Christ, instead of the examples and commands of the law ; Christ being the very essence and substance of this ancient and divine law ; hence this law has no bearing upon the modern Christian, but he is wholly dependent upon Christ for eternal salvation. PART H. A CONTROVERSY Between the Kev. W. H. H. Hays (who is one of the leading disciples of the modern Missionary Baptists, growing out of the publication of the foregoing part, as published in The Henderson Times, a secular paper of the Gity of Henderson, Texas, who writes above the signature of "Red." Also, an answer to the fictitious name of "Caledonia," whose strict- ure I append,) and the author. Ed. Times : — I have just read in your excellent paper of the 8th and 15th inst., Dr. S. M. Carlton's theory of the plan of salvation. I took up my pen once to dissect the untimely, deformed subject of Daniel Parkerism, and to show its deformity to public gaze, which is easily done ; but remembering that Dr. Carlton is not a mem- ber of any church, hence not responsible to any denom- ination for his doctrine, I concluded that the game was too small to waste ammunition with. I hope the Doctor is not as ignorant of Materia Medica as he is of the plan of salvation ; if so, I pity all who may fall into his hands. Yours truly, Minden, Sept. 19th, 1881. EED. 34 A CONTROVERSY. S. M. Carlton, M. D. -.—Since Providence has put it into the minds of some to "believe" what is false, are you sure, beyond a doubt, that you are not niistaken in being an ' ' heir of promise ? " CALEDONIA. Caledonia, Sept. 19th, 1881. Answer to "Red" and "Caledonia." Ed. Times : — We think that prudence was the better part of valor in our friend "Red " when he declined "to dissect the untimely, deformed subject of Daniel Parker- ism ; " "but remembering that Dr. Carlton is not a mem- of any church," etc., "I concluded that the game was too small to waste ammunition with." So far as my not being a member of any church is con- cerned, that need not make any difference with Mr. ' 'Red. " The Old School or Primitive Baptists, as a mass, will in- dorse me ; but the probabilities are that they would be too small game for Mr. Ked's ammunition ; but the Bible and its plain teachings are not too small game for him to waste ammunition at ; for we have heard him in thunder tones from the sacred desk, shooting at the plain teach- ings of the Bible, over the dead body of Daniel Parker, fearing that the truth might affect his salary a little ; for we could not regard him as ignorant, but as using policy for spoils. If Mr. "Red" had been as careful as we have been in "not being a member of any church," in regard to hypocrisy he perhaps would not occupy the place that he does to-day. A CONTROVERSY. 35 We with shame acknowledge our nothingness, but feel that the game is equal to his ammunition, and award to him full liberty : and when he shall hare annihilated the doctrine contained in my article, he will have wiped out the old and new Testament Scriptures, and will have to subterfuge under the traditions of his fathers, Antichrist, or some of the new translations that some of his egotistic brethen are so zealously perverting, to have things their own way. Mr. " Red" misrepresents us when he says, "Dr. S. M. Carlton's theory of the plan of salvation. " We deny having any theory of the plan of salvation of our own. as accused by Mr. "Red"; but the G-od of Heaven has a plan of salvation that we heartily indorse and advocate without the fear of successful contradiction. Perhaps our article is about to injure the business of our friend ; ' Red, " by convincing the people that their eternal salvation or destruction is in the hands of the Lord, and not in the hands of "Rev." dogmatic venders of the religion of "Mystery, Babylon." And should any of the people of G-od discover then mistake, and abandon their idolatry and come to the church of Christ, it might crip- ple his salary ; hence he makes a stab at my professional attainments, and pities those that fall into my hands. We suppose he does this by way of retaliation ; for surely our " Rev'd" friends could not be so ignorant of the spirit- ual meaning of the Bible as to pervert its meaning inno- cently. So we can but presume that his commission is soul-saving for money. In answer to our friend " Caledonia" we do not know 36 A CONTROVERSY. whether we are an heir of perdition or an heir of promise; but one thing we do know, that it is none of his business. Respectfully, Sept. 29, 1881. S. M. CARLTON. Dr. Carlton Answered. Ed. Times: — "So far as my not being a member of any church is concerned, that need not make any difference with Mr. Red. The Old School or Primitive Baptists, as a mass, will indorse me, " etc. I think I have more fellowship for the Baptists that Dr. Carlton speaks of, than he has, and I believe that I know as much or more about their articles of faith ; and I say, without the fear of contradict- ion, that they as a denomination will not indorse Dr. Carlton as a theologian. I have no war to make on the anti- Missionary Baptists, for when they split off from the Missionaries their articles of faith were the same. They split on Christian work ; not as to how men were saved, but as to what they were commanded to do after they were saved. As to the theory advocated by friend Dr. Carlton, ( and I do not wish to be considered in any other light,) there is not one organized body under the sun that holds to any such doctrine. There may be a faction, and probably is in existence, which was led off by Daniel Parker. He gave his theory in what he was pleased to call " Three Doses," but even Daniel Parker's " three doses" had a little better face than the dose presented by Dr. Carlton. I hope all who have his article in their house will re- read it and compare it with the Bible. You will see that A CONTROVERSY. 37 it is dishonoring to God. It does not lay man in the dust of humility before God, where he belongs ; but it makes him a bigot. It does not harmonize with the Bible as to the plan of salvation. It makes a part of the human family the sons of God, and He must take them by families, infants and all; and on the other hand, it destroys by families, infants and all. The love of God is not dis- played in any part of it, and I must say, with all respect to the feelings of Dr. Carlton, as a friend, that it is in fidelity in the extreme, and that I, with a great many of the good citizens of this section, were very much aston- ished when we saw the article appear in our excellent county paper ; and with your consent, Mr. Editor, I will take up the arguments, and answer, one by one, as soon as time will permit, as I am very busy just now. I suppose the Doctor misunderstood me when I referred to his profession. I did not do this to call in question his ability as a physician. I did not say that he was ignor- ant of Materia Medica. Not being versed in that branch of science, I cannot say; but having made the bible my study for a number of years, I must say that his theory is as far from the truth as that of Robt. Ingersoll, which I will show, if I take up his arguments to answer. As to what the Doctor says in regard to my hypocrisy in advocating certain theories for money, that is in per- fect keeping with the spirit which his theory produces in the heart. — " Nobody right but me and mine." Oct. 13, 1881. Respectfully, RED. 38 A CONTROVERSY. Ed. Times: — As our answer to Mr. " Red " will not ap- pear in this week's issue of the Times, for want of space, will your generosity allow me space to relate an anecdote that very aptly illustrates Mr. Red's assumption in claim- ing the name of " Primitive Baptist." In the absence of a woodchuck, a polecat crept into the house of the woodchuck and took possession. When the woodchuck returned, and found his house occupied, and demanded possession, the skunk bitterly refused to come out, and claimed that the house was actually his, and that he himself was a woodchuck. The woodchuck looked at him, talked with him, and smelt of him, and again ordered him out and off ; for he did not look like a woodchuck, talk like a woodchuck, nor did he smell like a woodchuck, and he knew that he was not a woodchuck. In like manner our friend " Red " may have crept in and stolen the old Baptist's articles of faith, but that does not make him an Old Baptist ; for he does not look like an Old Baptist, he does not preach like an Old Baptist, nor does he smell like an Old Baptist, and is not an Old Bap- tist. Respectfully, Oct. 20th, 1881. S. M. CARLTON. Carlton vs. "Red." Ed. Times : — We wish it distinctly understood that, personally, we are a friend to Mr. "Red," but a bitter enemy to his religious dogmas ; and when we take off our gloves to handle his assertions and perversions, we mean to do him no personal harm. A CONTROVERSY. 39 The devil himself was not more presumptuous when he confronted our mother Eve in the Garden of Eden, and gave God the he, than is our friend "Bed," when he attempts to claim the name "Old School or Primitive Baptist ;" neither was the devil further from the truth than is our friend "Red," and his assertions and pre- sumptions will ever stand as assertions and presumptions without proof ; for every honest historian knows the falsity of his pretense, and he is now begging the ques- tion, and desiring to be called by her name, to immortal- ize his shame, and is climbing up some other way, as a thief and a robber. (John x. 1.) And as Mr. "Red's" ancient cohorts sought not Christ because of his miracles, but because of the loaves and fishes (John vi. 26), in like manner Mr. "Red " and his Arminian cohorts left the Old Baptists and walked no more with them (John vi. 66). And why did they leave them 1 Because they were not of them. The Old Baptists are to-day what they were in the days of Christ and his apostles— sticklers for the doctrine of the Bible, without any new patents or new inventions ; and because they will not go with the multi- tude after filthy lucre and new inventions, the so-called missionaries, but indeed hirelings and gospel merchants, making merchandise of the gospel (John ii. 16 ; 2d Peter ii. 3 ; John x. 12, 13), and left the old landmarks and went after new gods, in the guise of missionaries, when indeed they are not missionaries, but hirelings, putting themselves up at the highest bidder, and are indeed proposing to sell salvation to poor lost sinners 40 A CONTROVERSY. — selling Jesus and him crucified to poor sin-sick souls; for indeed they claim that many are dying and going to hell for want of this treasured boon, and that nothing but money and means will serve to assist God in accomplishing His great and wonderful achievements. But Jesus Christ and his apostles did not so teach. They preached Jesus to the people without money and without price, and took God's word for surety that they should and would be sustained ; and where they were not re- ceived they were commanded to shake off the dust of their feet as a testimony against that people. — Mark vi. 11. But our so-called Missionaries are not willing to take God for surety, but must have further surety ; not will- ing to risk God, therefore pledges, confederations, articles of agreement, promising to pay the "Rev. D. D., L.L.D." a stipulated salary for so many discourses or sermons ; making merchandise of the gospel. And instead of "woe is me if I preach not the gospel" (1st Cor. ix. 16), it is, "Woe unto me if I get not the money in the guise of ' Christian work ;' " as though God was not able to take care of His chosen people, and lead them in paths that they have not known, and make rough places smooth, and crooked things straight, and darkness light before them (Isa. xlii. 16), at his own appointed time, and in his own appointed way, as he led the children of Israel out of Egyptian bondage. But in the face of all this perversion of the old land- marks for Mr. " Bed " to have the presumption to claim to be an Old School or Primitive Baptist, 0, my God ! Such A CONTROVERSY. 41 mockery ! When, indeed, the Old School or Primitive Baptists, whom Mr. "Bed" is pleased to call anti-mis- sionaries, are the only true apostolic missionaries that ever have been since the days of Christ and his apostles ; and every intelligent historian that will honestly lay aside his creed can trace them back to their apostolic origin. In order to prove more positively the identity of the Old Baptists with the apostles, we would ask Mr. " Bed," or any of his cohorts, to point out any command, ordin- ance or duty as laid down in the New Testament, that the Old Baptists do not observe as Christians, (we mean the people that he is pleased to call anti-missionaries), and my word for it, they will take it as a great favor, and will adopt it at once. He will then please point out something that they do in a church capacity that is not laid down in the New Testament ; and my word for it, they will abandon the practice. Will my friend " Bed " and his Arminian cohorts be equally honest in adopting things that are written in the New Testament, that they do not practice, and to abandon things that are not writ- ten in the Scriptures, that they have adopted into their so-called Primitive Baptist church, as stepping-stones and nurseries to their so-called church ? Then we will soon find who has a bona fide title to the name "Primi- tive Baptist." We much fear that our friend "Bed" will again dodge the question, and substitute a few more assertions without proof. Our friend will find that mak- ing assertions is an easy task ; but proving his assertions 42 A CONTROVERSY. and perversions to be truth, by a " Thus saith the Lord," will be very difficult. And we will receive no other tes- timony, and will award to him the remainder of his natural life to accomplish the task he proposes, and he will then be wanting in a " Thus saith the Lord." In regard to the infant's salvation, Mr. "Red" grossly misrepresents us ; for the Old School Baptists (not his New School that he represents) are the only people on earth, that we have any knowledge of, who preach a positive infant salvation ; for if infants are the little sin- less creatures that Mr. "Red" and his cohorts would have you believe, and that they are saved on account of then purity, then it stands as a certainty that all infants are lost ; for Christ came only to save sinners. And if they are saved upon conditions, based upon the volition or act of the creature, we know that all infants are lost, they not being competent to act faith or do any good deed. We claim that the infant is saved upon the same principle of mercy as is the adult. " Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will, and whom he will he hard- eneth." — Eom. ix. 18. Audit is none of Mr. "Red's" business whom God bestows mercy upon, or whom he hardens ; neither will his vanity change God's favors or frowns upon the subjects of his choice. How glad we are that we are a sinner, and that our two little infants, who died in infancy, were sinners ; for if they were not sinners, they have no part in the blood of Christ ; for he came only to save sinners. Another palpable misrepresentation is that our article A CONTROVERSY. 43 " is dishonoring to God, and is infidelity," when every candid reader knows that our article gives God all the praise, honor, glory, power, knowledge, wisdom, and makes Him omniscient and omnipresent, "who worketh all things after the counsel of his own will " (Eph. i. 2), and strips man of everything, excluding all boastings, and puts him in the dust of humility, at the feet of Jesus, pleading for mercy, peradventure God humbles him by sending the spirit of His love into his heart, quickening him into spiritual life, without which spiritual life man remains the same babbler and bigot that Mr. "Red" accuses us of being ; but, in fact, if belongs to him and his creed ; doing many wonderful good works, for which the Master once told a host of his brethren to depart, for he never knew them. The little "faction" that Mr. "Red" is pleased to say was led off by Daniel Parker in the spirit, is another misrepresentation ; but Daniel Parker and a few others were the genuine followers of the precepts and examples of the meek and lowly Jesus and his early disciples, as we are amply able to prove by a " Thus saith the Lord." And they being a little flock, was the most powerful de- monstrative characteristic of their being the true people of God, as typified in their not going off with the multi- tude, as did the so-called missionaries ; but they stayed with Jesus and his apostles, as typified by the little band that stayed with Jesus, and said, when Jesus asked the question, "Will ye also go away ?" Then Simon Peter answered him, "Lord, to whom shall we go? Thou 44 A CONTROVERSY. hast the words of eternal life." — John vi. 67, 68. God's chosen or elect people have ever been represented in small numbers, and in remnants, and haye been wrought upon with many trials ; and so are the Old Baptists to- day ; and when they see large numbers, and a great re- ligious tumult, they know from the New Testament Scriptures that the Spirit of Christ is not there. "For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints." — 1st Cor. xiv. 33. Another powerful characteristic that the Old Baptists are the true church of Christ and his early disciples, is that they were few in numbers compared with the multitude, and won- derfully hated, crucified, beheaded, cast into prison, etc. And that the Old Baptists are hated and hunted down with more sarcasm and derision than all the other denominations, no intelligent person would dare deny; and, no doubt, they would be equally punished with the disciples of old, but (thanks be to the giver of all things) the strong arm of the law protects them. Why is it that the Old Baptists are sneered and hissed at ? Because they will not brother and sister and nego- tiate and amalgamate with the daughters of the old har- lot of Eome (false churches), and bid them God speed, by partaking of their evil deeds. So it was with Jesus and his early disciples. And be- cause they would not amalgamate with the daughters of the old harlot (false churches), they were hissed at, per- secuted, crucified, cast into prison, etc. "And rejoiced that they were counted worthy to suffer shame for his A CONTROVERSY. 45 That there are hundreds and thousands of regenerated men and women caught in the nets of these lewd women, no intelligent Old Baptist will deny ; and for such, all intelligent Old Baptists have full and undivided Christian fellowship. And why ? Because they are ever ready to give a reason of their hope, based upon an ac- ceptable Christian experience. But they cannot eat and drink with them in a church capacity. And why ? Be- cause they are living in disorder, with one of the daught- ers of Antichrist (false churches). We will now advertise our friend "Red" that should he attempt to prove up a bona fide title to the name, " Primitive Baptist," we will not receive any testimony that has been published since the so-called missionaries left the Old Baptists, from the fact that any people who will teach a false doctrine, will publish a false history. We will further notify him that we have another article in embiyo, on Bible two-seed doctrine, (not Daniel Park- er) that will furnish him with constant employment the balance of his natural life, as he has undertaken the task of refuting the great fundamental truths of the Bible. We also propose to furnish our readers a diagram of the Antichristian churches, and compare it with the dia- gram of the true church of Christ, both of which will be measured by the measuring rod of God's own choosing, and expose Mr. Red's fallacy "to public gaze," as he pro- poses to expose our article. Eespectfully, S. M. CARLTON. Oct. 27, 1881. 46 A CONTROVERSY. Keply to Dr. S. M. Carlton. Ed. Tbies : — I come before the readers of your excel- lent paper to redeem a promise I made some time since, to answer some of the leading points of Dr. S. M. Carl- ton's theory of the plan of salvation, as published in your issues of September 8th and loth. Since that time the Doctor has written three very abusive articles, not only against me, but against all who would call in question the truth of his theory, for which I hope the Lord will forgive him. I would much rather that an abler pen than mine had taken this subject in hand. But whether I be a Primi- tive Baptist or not, I feel it to be my duty, "as much as in me is," to defend Primitive Christianity. Therefore I present this article in the fear of Cod, praying for the guidance of the Holy Spirit, that the fair name of God may be honored. It will be hard to put the Doctor's article in a position to answer in a logical manner, from the fact that near the middle of his first article is really the starting point, and he presents the whole thing under the form of ques- tions and answers — questions which no intelligent Bible student would ask. He first speaks of the power of God, His foreknowledge, etc., which, of course, we do not deny. But he thinks it would be very unjust in God to make a law that He knew, according to His foreknowl- edge, man would violate. Now, God saves men upon principles of justice, which we will find from an investigation of His word. We A CONTROVERSY. 47 learn from this that when the work of creation was finished, it was pronounced "good, and very good." In this work was included the formation of man, as to his body, out of "the dust of the ground," while "God breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and man be- came a living soul." — Gen.ii. 7. This language suggests the superiority of man to the various orders of animals ; but it is more clearly set forth in these words : "And God said, Let us make man in our image, and after our likeness ; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowls of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth." — Gen. i. 26. Man was to be the lord of the lower creation. We will now investigate the meaning of the words, "And God said, Let us make man in our own image, after our likeness." Dr. Carlton says, "Of course the humanity of Jesus Christ was present with God, and was the temple of the Spirit of God, forming the unity of the Father, Son and Spirit ; and as man could not have been made like a spirit, he was made after the image of Jesus, corporally. " I have no doubt but what the Doctor would argue that there is a difference between the likeness of God and the image of God. But I contend that the image of God is his likeness, and his likeness is his image. Therefore I conclude that man was made a rational being : in this he differed from all inferior ani- mals. The difference between them and man is as wide as the poles, for man is rational ; he is endowed with 48 A CONTROVERSY. mental faculties. Although these did not escape in the fall, yet man is still rational. The Apostle James says. •'Made after the s im ilitude of God. /V — James hi. 9. It is quite manifest that of all the numerous orders of earthly creatines, man alone was made in his rational nature after the image of God. I would further say that he was made after the moral image of God : that is, he was created a holy being ; and this was the chief glory with which he was crowned. "God made man up- right." — Ec. vii. 29. Man's original state was a state of innocence, integrity, uprightness, and polity. The ap- proving smile of God was upon him. "And the Lord God took the man and put him into the Garden of Eden, to dress it and to keep it ; and the Lord God commanded the man. Baying, Of every tree of the Garden thou mayest freely eat ; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil thou shalt not eat of it ; for in the day that thou eat- est thereof thou shalt sorely die." — Gen. ii. 15. 17. This is the law of God given to the one man Adam, who stood as the first man, the head and representative of the whole human family. 2sow this law would have been imto life had he kept it. and threatened death upon the breach thereof. Yet he did not long abide in this honor. Satan, using the subtlety of the serpent to seduce Eve, then by her seducing Adam, who without any compulsion did willfully transgress the law, which was the command given them, in eating the forbidden fruit, by this act they fell from their original righteousness and commun- ion with God, and all their posterity with them. There A CONTROVERSY. 49 is not now, never has been, or ever will be, any of the human family but what was represented in this fall. "For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God." — Eom. hi. 23. "Wherefore as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin, and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned." — Eom. v. 12. All becoming dead in sin and wholly defiled in all the faculties and parts of soul and body. "Unto the pure all things are pure ; but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving, is nothing pure ; but ever their minds and consciences are defiled. " — Titus i. 15. ' 'And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually." — Gen. vi. 5. "As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one ; there is none that understandeth ; there is none that seeketh after God ; they are all gone out of the way ; they are together be- come unprofitable. There is none that doeth good, no, not one. Their throat is an open sepulchre. With their tongues they have used deceit. The poison of asps is under their lips, whose mouth is full of cursing and bit- terness ; their feet are swift to shed blood ; destruction and misery are in their ways, and the way of peace have they not known. There is no fear of God before their eyes." — Eom. iii. 10, 19. We have now briefly gone through the creation of man, his standing in the Garden of Eden as the representative of all the human family, his capacity to keep the law as God had given it, his transgression and fall, and the present condition of all mankind. 50 A CONTROVERSY. We will now refer our readers to Dr. Carlton's theory. We will bring the leading points of it to the front ; for the whole article hinges on one leading point. The Doc- tor says, " Suppose we say that the family of perdition stood condemned in the mind of Jehovah before all the worlds were, and that their spiritual existence was vir^ tually in the loins of Satan before God spoke into exist- ence their natural being, and that the people of Anti- christ were raised in the fall of Adam from their degra- dation in hell (in a spiritual sense), to a level with the heirs of promise (in a natural sense), who were in Christ spiritually before the world was, and both families shook hands, as it were, in the persons of Adam and Eve, nat- urally and morally." Now, according to this, a part of the inhabitants of this world came up from the infernal regions of hell, and a part came down from the bright land of glory. There is not a solitary passage in the Bible that would lead any man to believe this. It is homespun — the production of a mind run wild on theory. It is dishonoring to God, and a reproach on the fair name of our mother Eve, as you will see, as we uncover the child more and more. Dr. Carlton has it wonderfully wrapped and covered, to hide its deformity. But I know its father— Daniel Park- er. It is not like the babe that lay in the manger, but it is as one coming from the horrible pit from which the Doctor says a part of the human family came. I am astonished at Dr. Carlton, claiming to be an Old Baptist and believing such a theory. A CONTROVERSY. 51 I have just looked through the confession of faith of seven Baptist churches of Wales, of A.D. 1643. Such a theory was not in existence among that people, neither is it laid down in their abstract of faith. I also have be- fore me the confession of the assembly of Baptists of England, A.D. 1689, called, in America, the " Philadel- phia Confession." I find no such theory among them. If I was an Anti-Missionary Baptist, I certainly would sue Dr. Carlton for damages, for publishing any such creed over my name. But I must examine the theory a little further, and, to use the Doctor's own expression, handle it without gloves, and present it just as it was presented by its founder, and, I suppose, as it is under- stood by Dr. Carlton, that the serpent spoken of in the Garden of Eden was a real personal devil, and that there was a sexual intercourse between him and Eve, and hence the children of the devil were brought into existence. This is what he means when he so mildly puts it that the two seeds shook hands in Adam. I understand this hand-shaking in Adam. I read these " doses" long be- fore I saw Dr. Carlton, but not from the Bible. I have heard it harped upon by its adherents on the streets. especially where men meet to whittle on empty goods boxes, and I have heard it a few times from the pulpit. Those that generally believe it (and they are few) try to wrap it up to hide its deformity, as the Doctor has done. Now candid reader, we have before us the two seeds> as represented in Dr. Carlton's theory — the natural de- scendants of the devil, and the natural descendants of 52 A CONTROVERSY. Adam. The devil's race were all the children of the in- fernal regions from before the foundation of the world. Adam's race were all the children of God from before the foundation of the world. Now, the advocates of this theory hold that the two races are kept separate and distinct, and were so at the coming of Christ ; hence this is one of their passages, "ye are the children of your father, the devil," etc. — John viii. 44. I ask, who were the people thus addressed? They were the Jews, the natural descendants of Abraham, and could be traced back through him to Adam. So the passage does not support the theory. If the two seeds or races are not kept separate and distinct, we have to-day a conglomerated mass indeed. Such an amalgamation is fearful. Where would their final home be ? Echo an- swers, Where ? But the advocates of this theory insist and contend that they are and ever have been kept separate ; that one of the children of Adam will not marry one of the children of the devil ; that is, they do not inter- marry. Mark the legitimate conclusion. As I said in my former article, they are saved by families, infants and all. According to the Doctor's own statement, the children of God, which came down into Adam, and the children of the lower regions, which were raised in Adam, all re- turn to the home from whence they came. What other conclusion can we logically come to ? The theory con- A CONTROVERSY. 53 tends that none except the race of Adam was represented in the precious life and blood of the Lamb. BED. Nov. 10, 1881. (To be Continued.) Keply to Dr. S. M. Carlton. — Continued. Quoting again from the Doctor, and his perversions of this Scripture, " For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive," the Doctor says, " The ransomed of the Lord were all that were in Adam, in a spiritual sense, at the time of his transgression. So Christ died for all that fell in Adam, as Adam at that time was not contaminated with the wicked principles of Satan, as he was not yet defiled ; but was made susceptible (together with Eve) to the conception and germination of the chil- dren of wrath." We come to the conclusion that from the above statement, and from the Doctor's exposition of this passage, that those who were not represented in Adam cannot die temporally. For temporal death came through Adam, by his violating the law of Grod. "In the day thou eatest thereof, thou shalt surely die." The thing is too absurd to admit of argument. Upon this hypothesis, it follows that those who were not repre- sented in Christ, cannot possibly be raised from the dead. So the seed of the devil, which the Doctor speaks of, to use his own language, " will sink back into nonentity." It appears to me, if this race are really the legitimate children of the devil, and have once been in hell, as the 54 A CONTROVERSY. Doctor says, as much as all who fell in Adam had once been in heaven, hell would not be a place of punishment, but of enjoyment, from the fact that they, without the loss of one , are permitted to return back home from whence they came ; for in a human sense it is always a joy after a long absence to return home to dwell with kindred spirits. There could be no remorse from the fact that there had been nothing lost. There could be no in- creased wrath of God, for they had only acted their part that God intended they should ; the only condemnation that possibly could be : that they had not been as faithful in sin as they ought to have been. For, according to the theory, they are only serving the purpose of God. But we learn from the Bible that one man lifted up his eyes in torment, who certainly was one of the natural de- scendants of Adam. He saw Lazarus afar off, in Abra- ham's bosom, and cried, " Father Abraham," etc. Hence he was a natural descendant of Abraham, and could be traced back through him to Adam. It appears that he did not enjoy his home, that he did not want his five brethren to come home, but rather prayed that Laz- arus be sent back to this world, to warn them, that they come not to this place of torment. It appears that there had been means of escape provided, or it would have been folly in the extreme to have had them warned. The great misery of the lost will be that we have made our bed in hell. We next present the case of the flood. Let us see if the two seeds are preserved, (for we are argu- ing from the Daniel Parker standpoint,) two natural A CONTROVERSY. 55 seeds. "And the Lord said unto Noah, Come thou, and all thy house, into the Ark ; for in thee have I seen righteousness before me in this generation. And Noah did according unto all that the Lord commanded him. And Noah went in, and his sons, and his wife, and his son's wives with him into the ark, because of the waters of the flood."— Gen. vii. 1, 5, 7. Now, the word says, these were righteous ; at any rate their genealogy can be traced back to Adam. I cannot see where the natural descendants of the devil got in, unless they came in with the beast, or some of the creeping things ; then it follows that they could not have been human beings. I must here say to my friend Dr. Carlton that it is bad theory to admit that the devil has creative power, and as you say, his " seed was in his loins," which leads our mind to procreative power, as a matter of course, which germinated through Eve the natural children of the devil. We again quote from the Doctor's theory, " The devil being deceitful and cunning, he confronted the woman, and she sinned against the command of God, and Adam loved her, and died to the love of holiness, and was made alive to the love of sin, by partaking of her sins, that he might live with her. Hence we see that the tares were sown with the wheat ; and never until this sin was Adam and Eve capable of the conception and germina- tion of the children of wrath, for the spiritual germs did not exist in them, as they were free from sin, or they could not have been good. So was the field free from 56 A CONTROVERSY. tares when the wheat was sown ; but there came an enemy afterwards and sowed tares with the wheat. And as Adam and Eve represent the field, the hens of promise were sown in them first, and afterwards the serpent sowed the seed of Satan in them ; and as wheat and tares grow together in the same field or soil, from the same culture, so in like manner do the heirs of promise and the heirs of perdition, conceive, germinate and mature from the same natural parents. See alle- gories of Cain and Abel, Jacob and Esau, Isaac and Ish- mael." My object in quoting from this part of the Doc- tor's theory is to show his flat contradiction. For he said, as I showed in my former article, "That the chil- dren of perdition were in the loins of their father the devil." Here he would leave' the impression that they were sown in Adam and Eve ; yet he claims the two natural seeds, and refers us to the allegories of Cain and Abel, Isaac and Ishmael, Jacob and Esau. Now, what he, and all who are in harmony with his theory, mean by this, is that Cain, Ishmael and Esau were the natural descendants of the devil. His perversion of the parable of the wheat and tares, Mat. xiii., 37. The Doctor says that "Adam and Eve represent the field." But Christ says, in the 38th verse of the above quoted chapter, that " the field is the world. He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man," meaning himself, dispensing truth, either personally or by his servants. For by the appointment of Christ the good seed of the gospel is to be sown among all nations, so that the visi- A CONTROVERSY. 57 ble church shall be co-extensive with the world. And that many are now in the visible church who have not been born of the Spirit, and such will be the case at the end of the world. Like the foolish virgins, who took their lamps, but no oil with them. — Mat. xxv. 3. But the Doctor insists that this parable refers to Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. That the devil was the enemy who sowed the tares by his procreative power. We know that the tares are the children of the devil, in a figurative sense, but not brought into existence as rep- resented by the Doctor's theory, as we will see by an ex- amination of the account given of the fall of man. As I said in my former article, man was created in the moral image of God. That is, he was created a holy being, and the character of God was the standard of moral right and moral perfection. " And the Lord God took the man, and put him into the Garden of Eden, to dress it and keep it. And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the Garden thou mayest freely eat ; but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil thou shalt not eat of it ; for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." — Gen. ii. 15, IT. These words were addressed to Adam before Eve was formed. So Eve received the law through Adam. She was not self-existent, being separ- ate and distinct from Adam, u Bone of his bones, and flesh of his flesh." Adam stood as the head and repre- sentative of all the human family ; that is every human being, beginning with Cain and Abel, that has lived or is 58 A CONTROVERSY. now living on the face of the earth. I adopt the words of Paul in Athens, when he says that God " hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth ; and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation." — Acts xvii. 26. This of course means that every nation, and all the individuals composing every nation, have de- scended from a common stock. This shows the fallacy of the Doctor's theory of a devil with all of his children created in him. For this would necessarily place two heads or representatives in the Garden ; one for the seed of Adam, the other for the seed of the devil. We notice next the cause of the first sin in Adam and Eve ; the temptation, too, does not appear to be so very strong. They were permitted to eat the fruit of all the trees in the Garden, except one. Only one prohibition was laid upon them. They were told that if they violated this prohibition, a terrible evil, death, would come upon them. So far as we can judge, there was no reason in favor of eating the forbidden fruit, and a reason of tremendous strength in favor of abstaining from it. The serpent, however, beguiled Eve, and she ate the fatal fruit, giv- ing it to her husband, who also ate. Paul tells us that "Adam was not deceived; but the woman, being de- ceived, was in the transgression." — I Tim. ii. 14. Eve was beguiled and sinned under deception ; but Adam sinned, as we say, with his eyes open. He knew what he was doing, and cast the blame of his act on God, saying, " The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me A CONTROVERSY. 59 of the tree, and I did eat." — Gen. iii. 12. Eve, though acting under a mistake and a delusion, was by no means excusable ; but Adam was far more inexcusable than she ; for he acted intelligently, as well as voluntarily. The part which the devil played in this transgression was not to sow any literal tares ; but as an evil spirit, he used a deceptive argument, which penetrated Eve's heart, through her mind, and caused her to disbelieve God. Adam's sin was of the same nature, although he was "not deceived;" yet he consented to disobey God, and consent is of the heart, and must have preceded the ex- ternal act of disobedience. It seems plain to my mind that the sin of our first parents had its origin in their hearts. I cannot see where the parable of the wheat and tares fits in this transaction. Neither do I see a generation brought into existence by the devil. But we see that Adam and Eve sinned, because they had the power to do it under this covenant of works. The threatened penalty claims attention. " In the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." The bodies of Adam and Eve did not die actually on the day of transgression ; but they died virtually. Not only did the moral death of Adam result from his sin, but the natural death of all of his posterity results from the same cause. There is something more than the death of the body meant by the threatening, " Thou shalt surely die." Spiritual death was evidently referred to ; and it is far more fearful than bodily death. The latter takes place when the spirit leaves the body ; the former takes place 60 A CONTROVERSY. when God leaves the spirit. The cessation of union, communion and fellowship with God is so great a cal- amity that death is its fittest designation. Adam and Eve died a spiritual death the very day they sinned against God. They were cut off from Him as the source of their happiness and joy. No longer did they live in the light of His countenance, with His smiles resting upon them ; but they walked in darkness, and trembled under the frown of the Almighty. It is written of the apostate head of our race, '*' Therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the Garden of Eden to till the ground from whence he was taken. So he drove out the man ; and he placed at the east of the Garden of Eden Cheru- bim and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life." — Gen. hi. 23, 24. Nov 24, 1881. EED. {To be continued.) Eeply to Dr. S. M. Carlton.— Continued. As we said in our former article, Adam, though creat- ed holy, did not remain in that state, but by voluntary transgression fell therefrom, bringing ruin on himself, and his posterity. His sinful nature is propagated by ordinary generation, and the propagation had an early beginning; for it is said of Adam that he " begat a son in his own likeness, after his image. " — Gen. v. 3. This declaration is specially worthy of notice, in view of the fact that " God created man in his own image." — A CONTROVERSY. 61 Gen. i. 27. Had Adam remained in his state of inno- cence, no donbt his children would have been born as he was created, namely, in the moral image of God. But he sinned, and humanity becoming poisoned in its source has transmitted poisonous streams only through all gen- erations. Paul, assuming as true the universal corrup- tion of human nature, refers to "the children of disobe- dience," and says, as we have seen, that himself and the members of the church of Ephesus had formerly a place among them. "Among whom also we all had our con- versation in time past, in the lust of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind, and were by na- ture the children of wrath, even as others." — Eph. ii. 3. Children of sin ; and if we are by nature children of wrath, we are by nature children of sin. All unregenerated men stand before God just alike, and are denominated children of wrath, children of sin, children of the wicked one, children of the devil, tares. And all the names that Dr. Carlton would call up in proof that they were the natural descendants of the devil, only go to prove what we have before stated, that all become sinners by the transgression of one man. Hence David said, " Behold, I was shapen in iniquity, and in sin did my mother con- ceive me." — Ps. Ii. 5. "For we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin ; as it is written, there is none righteous, no, not one ; there is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God." — Rom. iii. 9, 11. This is a severe indictment of the human race, for it includes Jews and Gentiles, 62 A CONTROVERSY. the two divisions of the race, and declares all guilty be- fore God. Every mouth is stopped, in view of the just sentence of condemnation pronounced by the law. This is what is usually called the moral law, the only law whose jurisdiction extends to "all the world." It is manifest that the foregoing Scripture teaches man's con- demnation, and his depravity. He is condemned be- cause he has transgressed the law of God, and not be- cause, as Dr. Carlton contends, that it was so fixed by the decrees of God before the f omidation of the world ; or that they were the children of the devil, and came up from the infernal regions. We have repeatedly said that Dr. Carlton's theory is dishonoring to God. This I think I have shown in my former articles, but propose to show it again by quoting from him. He says, " Provi- dence has wisely put into the minds of all men to believe that there is a chance for them individually to be saved. Even the heirs of perdition believe alike with the heirs of promise, (prior to regeneration) that they will be, or can be, saved upon legal principles, and are ever trying to court the favor of God upon law principles, hoping to bring God under obligations to save them." This is very dishonoring to God indeed, to presume to say that he would fix a law in order to delude a part of the human family. But to put it more in harmony with the Doc- tor's arguments, that God would bring up a part of the children from the infernal regions, and fool them, mak- ing them believe that they could get to heaven, and amid all their striving God is only deluding them at every A CONTROVERSY. 63 step. Far be it from God ; for he is a God of love, justice and mercy, and does not damn any one on any such prin- ciples ; but sinners are lost on principles of justice. They will not sink back, as Dr. Carlton says, into nonentity, but they will be punished. What is punishment ? It is the infliction of pain for disobedience. Punishment has reference to sin, and under the government of God it is the executed penalty, of His law. It is God who ex- ecutes this penalty, which is death. Some contend that the wicked will only be punished by painful mem- ories, remorse of conscience, and agony of despair. No doubt memory has to do with the miseries of the lost, but an operation of the memory is not- the penalty of the divine law. Eemorse of conscience is inseparable from the penalty, but it is not the penalty. The truth is, that the penalty of God's law is death. " The wages of sin is death ; but the gift of God is eternal life, through Jesus Christ our Lord." — Eom. vi. 23. God punishes them because they deserve to be pun- ished. This is the only true philosophy of punishment. The supreme reason why sinners are punished is that because of their sins, they deserve punishment. God, as moral governor of the universe, executes the penalty of His law. This fact enables us to understand what is meant by " the wrath of God." This is a scriptural phrase, and it denotes God's just and holy indignation against sin. This indignation arises from the fact that sin is a transgression of His law, and therefore His just- ice and holiness, yes, and His'goodness, too, imperatively 64 A CONTROVERSY. requires that sinners be punished. There is no Bible in the Doctor's theory — no reason ; the very thought is blasphemous. That God would bring up children from the regions of hell in order to delude them ; give them bodies, make them believe they are going to heaven, then in the final judgment, say, "I was only acting the part of a deceiver in your case, for it was always my intention to send you to hell." Does Dr. Carlton and his adherents believe this ? Or do they use it only for argument's sake ? I will not accuse him as harshly as he did me, when he said that I advocated certain theories through dishonesty ; but I will say that it is a want of Bible knowledge on his part. Narrow views of God indeed, and of the plan of salvation, built up alone by isolated passages. Why not take the teaching of Jesus, who is so clear and plain upon the subject? ' Tor God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believed in Him should not perish, but have everlasting life." — John hi. 16. This passage shows the universal love of God to all mankind ; and He loves to the extent, that notwithstanding the voluntary sin of man in violating His holy and righteous law, that He offers eternal life in and through His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ. The gospel is the means in the hands of God for the salvation of sinners. But the Doctor con- tends that the gospel is not a public address to sinners. We quote from his article : " The preaching of the gos- pel indiscriminately to all men is for the purpose of sup- plying his vessels of mercy with spiritual food, and is for A CONTROVERSY. 65 the further purpose of confounding the brain religion of the mighty and wise of Antichrist, leaving Satan and his spiritual progeny without excuse, that they may not plead ignorance in the day of final retribution, thereby making their own condemnation more complete." Let us com- pare this with the Bible. " Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature : he that belie veth and is baptized shall be saved ; but he that believeth not shall be damned." — Mark xvi. 15, 16. According to this commission, salvation is offered to the whole human family. Language could be neither more general nor more spe- cific. " Into all the world," to " every creature." But the fearful intimation is that some will not believe, and through unbelief will incur damnation. It is the duty of all to believe. Believe what? The gospel. " And the times of this ignorance God winked at ; but now com- mandeth all men everywhere to repent ; because He hath appointed a day in which He will judge the world in righteousness, by that man whom He hath ordained ; whereof He hath given assurance unto all men, in that He hath raised him from the dead." — Acts xvii. 30, 31. Other Scriptures might be quoted to prove the fallacy of the Doctor's position in regard to the preaching of the gos- pel, but we think the above quoted sufficient. In notic- ing his article farther, he destroys everything pertaining to the grace of God in the plan of salvation, in evidence of which I quote again from his article. Eef erring to sinners, he says : "They are lost upon a GQ A CONTROVERSY. principle of justice, and that justice is based upon the fact that the heirs of perdition, in a spiritual sense, are not God's. They came from the infernal regions, and they will return to Satan, the author of their spiritual existence; and in like manner, the heirs of promise will return to Christ in heaven, from whence they came, who is the author of their spiritual existence." I contend that it would be no act of grace for God to bestow upon his children what naturally belongs to them from all eternity. They go to heaven by right, and not by grace ; hence that good old hymn, "Amazing grace!" is wrong, and should have been written: " Amazing decree! how sweet the sound! That saved a child of God ; I never was lost, but was always found ; Never was blind, but did always see.*' According to the Doctor's theory, the word grace, that has been so precious to Christians in every age of the world, would be lost. No one is unworthy, according to the theory ; none are lost except the children of the devil, and they were created for that express purpose. No one is saved, ex- cept those who had once been in heaven ; hence the word grace is lost. The theory teaches eternal condem- nation upon the heirs of perdition. Eternal justification follows as to the heirs of promise as a matter of course, and I see not why eternal regeneration, or eternal adop- tion, or eternal sanctification, may not be as consistently advocated as eternal justification. The purpose of A CONTROVERSY. 67 God will furnish as plausible arguments in the one case as in the other ; that is to say, it will furnish no argu- ments at all. Justification, according to the teachings of the Scriptures, always implies previous condemnation. If, then, justification dates back from eternity, shall we say that condemnation was antecedent to eternity ? This would be absurd. The position which we assume is that all are condemned, all are lost, and that none are justi- fied only by faith in Christ, and are therefore justified when they believe on him, which is proven by the fol- lowing Scriptures : "He that believe th on him is not condemned ; but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God." — I John hi. 18. "And by him all that believe are justified from all things from which ye could not be justified by the law of Moses." — Acts. xiii. 39. " Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ." — Rom. v. 1. The Doctor says, "God saves them because they are His, and rejects them because they are not His." Let us see how this corresponds with the doctrine of adoption as taught in the Bible. The theory makes God adopt His own children, who were His from all eternity. Such an idea is contrary to the teachings of the Bible, or human reason. We will briefly illustrate the doctrine of adoption. By this pro- cess, children are taken from families of which they are natural members, introduced into other families, and made to sustain a legal relation thereto — a relation simi- 68 A CONTROVERSY. lar in its results to those of the natural relation. Such children are recognized as the children of those who had them adopted, and become their heirs. In view of this definition of civil adoption we can easily see that spirit- ual adoption is the act by which God takes those who are denominated in the Scriptures children of wrath, children of the wicked one, children of the devil, into a new relation to Himself — a filial relation, involving their recognition and treatment as children. They are dis- tinguished by the appellation, "Sons and daughters of the Lord Almighty." — II Cor. vi. 18. I have briefly gone through with the Doctor's -theory of the plan of salvation, and have shown, I think, to all unbiased minds, that it is unscriptural, and, as I said in the out- set, dishonoring to God. I will in my next, prove that the Missionary Baptists are the Primitive Baptists. Eespectfully, Dec. 1st, 1881. EED. Who are the Primitive Baptists? I quote from Dr. Carlton's article of Oct. 27th, " We wish it distinctly understood that personally we are a friend to Mr. Red, but a bitter enemy to his religious dogmas ; and when we take off our gloves to handle his assertions and perversions, we mean to do him no per- sonal harm. The devil himself was not more presump- tuous when he confronted our mother Eve in the Garden of Eden, and gave God the lie, than is our friend Red A CONTROVERSY. 69 when he attempts to claim the name of 4 Old School or Primitive Baptist ; ' neither was the devil further from the truth than is our friend Red, and his assertions and presumptions will ever stand as assertions and presump- tions without proof ; for every honest historian knows the fallacy of his pretense, and he is now begging the question and desiring to be called by her name, to im- mortalize his shame, and is climbing up Gome other way as a thief and a robber." — John x. 1. These are very grave accusations Dr. Carlton has brought against me. No doubt it would stir the Irish blood in my veins, were it not that I am so well ac- quainted with him. He always has a certain quantity of gas on hand, and that must escape, it matters not what he goes at ; so I shall pay no attention to the gassy and abusive part of his article, but will briefly show by Scripture and history who are the Primitive Baptists, the Missionary or Anti-missionary Baptists. I will first give a brief definition of a church. A church is a con- gregation of Christ's baptized disciples, united in the belief of what he has said, and covenanted to do what he has commanded. I now ask, who were the first in the church ? Paul answers the question. " And God hath set some in the church ; first Apostles." — I Cor. xii. 28. Then to whom was the commission given? " Co ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved ; but he that be- lieveth not shall be damned." The Anti- Missionaries TO A CONTROVERSY. contend that the above quoted commission was given alone to the apostles, and hence ended with them ; but I contend that it was given to the church ; for the apostles were first in the church. Then the first church which was organized by Jesus Christ was a missionary body, commissioned to go forth and to preach the gospel to every creature. But did this Jerusalem church, estab- lished by Christ himself, send out N missionaries ? Yes ; for it is said in Acts, " Then tidings of these things came unto the ears of the church which was at Jerusalem ; and they sent forth Barnabas, that he should go as far as Antioch." — Acts xi. 22. Yes, this model church sent out a missionary to a heathen city to preach the gospel. This was a foreign mission. Thus we have seen that the church organized by the personal ministry of Christ was a missionary church ; for as we have stated, she sent forth Barnabas to Antioch to preach the gospel. And this church at Antioch, gathered by missionary labor, sent out Barnabas and Paul on a mission to the heathen. " And when they had fasted and prayed, and laid their hands on them, they sent them away. So they being sent forth by the Holy Ghost departed unto Seleu- cia, and from thence they sailed to Cyprus." — Acts xiii. 3, 4. And after these eminent missionaries had preached the gospel successfully to many heathen cities, they returned to the same church and made a report of their labors and success in their mission, which is thus recorded : " And when they were come, and had gathered the church to- A CONTROVERSY. 71 gether, they rehearsed all that God had done with them, and how He had opened the door of faith unto the Gen- tiles."— Acts xiy. 37. We have now proven that the churches at Jerusalem and Antioch were missionary churches. And of a Christian, Paul said, "And we have sent with him [Titus] the brother, whose praise is in the gospel through- out all the churches ; and not that only, but who was also chosen of the churches to travel with us," etc. — II Cor. viii. 18, 19. This brother was chosen of the churches and sent on a mission, and these brethren were called " messengers of the churches." As we have shown that the model church at Jerusalem, and some of the churches planted by the apostles, were missionary, it is evident that all these churches were of the same character, from the fact that they were organ- ized under the direction of the Spirit. And in regard to the support of these missionaries, Paul says, ' ' Even so hath the Lord ordained, that they which preach the gos- pel should live of the gospel." — I Cor. ix. 14. Here is the f oreordination and decree of God for the support of the ministry. And more, the apostle Paul ventured to take wages for his support in the missionary work. He said, " I robbed other churches, taking wages of them, to do you service." — II Cor. xi. 8. But, if a modern missionary does the same thing, it is considered by our anti-brethren a very high crime. And Dr. Carl- ton says, it is soul-saving for money. Hence, accordiog to the Doctor's theory, Paul was a very bad man. T2 A CONTROVERSY. We will next show by history that in the separation the anti- missionary Baptists were the seceding party, which withdrew from the regular missionary Baptists. This secession upon the part of the anti-missionaries oc- cured at different times in different parts of the country. In Virginia, the separation took place in the year 1832. We quote from Religious Denominations of the United States and Great Britain, page 87, in which Elder S. Trott, who was an anti-missionary Baptist, says : " This separation occasioned the splitting of several associations, and many churches. We took, as a distinguishing appellation, the name, Old School or Primitive Baptists." Here is the candid confession of a leading anti-missionary Baptist, that those who are now claiming to be Old School or Primitive Baptists separated themselves from the rest of the denomination, and took a stand as a distinct peo- ple ; and at that time, about 1832, the appellation or name, Old School Baptists. Therefore, according to El- der Trott, there was no body of Baptists in the world call- ing themselves Old School prior to the year 1832. Dr. John Watson says, in "Old Baptist Test," page 36 : " After my own painful separation from the Mission- aries in 1836, (this was in Tennessee) a number of churches in the bounds of the Old Concord Association met together and formed the Stone Eiver Association." Hence we see from their own statement that they split off from the regular Missionary Baptists, and were but a faction. But were the ancient Baptists, up to the time of the separation, missionaries or anti-missionaries ? The A CONTROVERSY. 73 Philadelphia Association, from our earliest account of it, was a missionary body. To place this beyond dispute, I shall quote a few items from the official records of that body. Dec. 8th, 1881. {Concluded next week.) Who are the Primitive Baptists ? — Continued. Turn to Benedict's history of the Baptists, vol. 2, page 99, and you will see that in 1753 the Philadelphia Asso- ciation sent out Eld. John Gano as a missionary to the churches in North Carolina, which were soon after form- ed into the Kehukee Association. The next year, 1754, the association sent two other missionaries to assist him, Elders Benjamin Miller and Peter P. Yanhorn, by the in- strumentality of whose united labors these churches, previously deranged, were reclaimed and set in order, and many sinners converted." In this quotation it is shown that the largest and most influential association in Amer- ica, the Philadelphia, was a missionary body, and that Kehukee Association was formed as the fruit of the labors of her missionaries, eighty years prior to the anti-mis- sionary separation. We are informed by Benedict, the historian, page 642, in his chapter on Virginia, that the first Baptist church in that state was organized by Eobert Nordin, a mission- ary, who sailed from England in 1814. His brother mis- sionary, Thomas White, who sailed with him, died before they reached America, but Eld. Nordin was joined a few 74 A CONTROVERSY. years after his arrival by the two other missionary preach- ers, Casper Mintz and Eichard Jones, from England, who* aided in planting the first Baptist churches in Virginia and North Carolina. These Baptists were so filled with the missionary spirit that a few f amilies which moved to North Carolina in ten years became sixteen churches. Thus, in examining the history of the Old Baptists of America, more than one hundred years before the anti- missionary separation, we find that these Old Baptists were missionaries. The Charleston Association, honored for its antiquity, piety, intelligence and orthodoxy, was formed the 21st day of Oct., 1751. In 1755, four years after the constitution, there is this account given in Fur- man's history of the Charleston Association, Charleston edition of 1811, pages 10 and 11: "The associations, taking into consideration the destitute condition of many places in the interior settlements of this and the neigh- boring states (then provinces), recommended to the churches to make contributions for the support of a mis- sionary to itinerate in those parts. Mr. Hart was au- thorized and requested, provided a sufficient sum should be raised, to procure, if possible, a suitable person for the purpose. With this view he visited Pennsylvania and New Jersey the following year, and prevailed with Eev. John Gano to undertake the service, who attended the annual meet- ing, and was cordially received. The association re- quested Mr. Gano to visit the Yadkin first, and after- wards to bestow his labors wherever Providence should A CONTROVERSY. 75 i appear to direct. He devoted himself to the work. It afforded ample scope for his distinguished piety, eloquence and fortitude ; and his ministrations were crowned with remarkable success. Many embraced and professed the gospel. The following year he received from the association a letter of thanks for his faithfulness and industry in the mission." Thus we see that the Old Baptists of the old Charleston association were Missionary Baptists. We again call the attention of the reader to the doings of the Philadelphia association, which is the oldest and most influential association in America. This associa- tion was organized in 1707, and has continued to the present time. The minutes of this association for one hundred years are preserved in book form. We quote from page 97, which is the minutes of 1766. We have the following record : " After prayer, it was moved and agreed that it is most necessary for the good of the Bap- tist interest that the association have at their disposal every year a sum of money. Accordingly it was further agreed that the churches henceforth do make a collection every quarter, and send the same yearly to the associa- tion, to be by them deposited in the hands of trustees ; the interest whereof only to be by them laid out every year in support of ministers traveling on the errand of the churches, or otherwise, as the necessities of said churches shall require." Also on page 298, in the year 1794, we have the following account of this association : 76 A CONTROVERSY. "In consequence of information communicated to the association by Bro. Wm. Rogers, it is desired that all do- nations for the propagation of the gospel among the Hindoos in the East Indies, be forwarded to him." And in the next year, page 307, we have the following : "Agreed, that the churches be advised to make collec- tions for the missionaries to the East Indies, and forward the same to Dr. Rogers." The character of this body is set forth in the language of H. Gr. Jones, the editor of these minutes, on page 5. "The Philadelphia association, from the first, has en- gaged earnestly in efforts for the proper education of its ministers, and the spread of the gospel in the world. Rhode Island College, now Brown University, received its patronage and contributions from its origin, as the subsequent minutes show. It will be seen, also, that from the first it has been an effective missionary body. Hundreds of churches have been gathered by the able and self-denying men sent out at its expense to regions where no religious privileges had before been enjoyed," etc. From the foregoing reliable documents and others which might be introduced, it is fully settled that the American Baptists, from the very first, down to the anti-missionary separation, were missionaries. And, instead of the anti- missionaries being entitled to the appellation, Old School or Primitive Baptists, by way of distinction, they are a new-fangled set of Baptists, never heard of until the present century. So it is altogether a misrepresentation to call the anti-missionaries Old Baptists or Primitive A CONTROVERSY. 77 Baptists. It not only does injustice to the regular Bap- tists of America, but also of England and Wales. In re- gard to the names assumed by the anti-missionaries, I would quote from an eminent historian: "Old School and Primitive Baptists are appellations so entirely out of place that I cannot, even as a matter of courtesy, use them without adding " so-called," or some such expres- sion . I have seen so much of the missionary spirit among the Old Anabaptists, Waldenses, and other ancient sects ; so vigorous and perpetual were the efforts of those Christains whom we claim as Baptists in the early, mid- dle, and latter ages, to spread the gospel in all parts of the world, among all nations and languages where they could gain access, that it is plain that those who merely preach predestination and do-nothing, have no claim to be called by their name." Had we space, we would prove by authenticated his- tory that the English and Welsh Baptists were mission- aries. We would advise our friend Dr. Carlton to read Baptist history more carefully before he makes such bold assertions. Eespectfully, Dec. 15th, 1881. EED. Carlton's Last Shot. Ed. Times : — We regret exceedingly the necessity of abridging our article with the limited space awarded to us in bringing this controversy to a close, but feel grate- ful to you for allowing us space to correct a part of the 78 A CONTROVERSY. misrepresentations of Mr. "Red" upon our articles, he being notorious for perversions and misconstructions. We feel to compliment you for your preferment in stopping the controversy, knowing the aversion to a re- ligious controversy in a secular paper among the masses, without the argument happens to suit their particular creed. The stupidity of our friend "Bed" is preponderous, and leads him into many spiritual or religious dogmas, or he is wantonly perverting our meaning for policy's sake ; either of which would be bad enough in one who sets himself up to teach. He says : "We will now refer our readers to Dr. Carlton's theory. We will bring the leading points of it to the front ; for the whole article hinges on one leading point." " The Doctor says : Sup- pose we say that the family of perdition stood condemned in the mind of Jehovah before all worlds were, and that their spiritual existence was virtually in the loins of Satan, before God spoke into existence their natural be- ings ; and that the people of Antichrist were raised in the fall of Adam from their degradation in hell, (in a spiritual sense,) to a level with the heirs of promise, (in a natural sense) who were in Christ spiritually before the world was, and both families shook hands, as it were, in the persons of Adam and Eve, naturally and morally." "Now, according to this, a part of the inhabitants of this world came up from the infernal regions of hell, and a part came down from the bright land of glory. There is not a solitary passage in the Bible that would lead any A CONTROVERSY. 79 man to believe this. It is homespun— the production of a mind run wild on theory. It is dishonoring to G-od, and a reproach on the fair name of our mother Eve. as you will see, as we uncover the child more and more. Dr. Carlton has it wonderfully wrapped and covered, to hide its deformity. But. I know its father. Daniel Par- ker. It is not like the babe that lay in the manger, but it is as one coming from the horrible pit, from which the Doctor says a part of the human fa mil y came. I am astonished at Dr. Carlton claiming to be an Old Bap- tist and believing such a theory." TTe here ask pardon for calli n g in question Mr. " Bed's " literature, and aptness for vulgar constructions, and would refer our readers to his proposed fleshly am- algamation with Eve and Satan in another part of essay. Xo one who has made any proficiency in English litera- ture can possibly construe our language so as to make it mean a fleshly two-seed doctrine. Xor can it be found in our ankle that there is any difference in the flesh. All flesh is as grass, and returns to its mother earth. The difference is in the spirit, and none ever have that warfare that Paul speaks of. between the opposing spirits, except the hens of promise, and they are by nature just like the hens of perdition. (Eph. h. B,) until God puts into then hearts the spirit of His love. Then the warfare commences, and continues the remainder of their natural lives. "And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed : it shall bruise thv head, and thou shalt bruise his 80 A CONTROVERSY. heel." — Gen. iii. 15. These two seeds are certainly op- posing spirits, for all flesh is alike. (Mr. "Bed" is pleased to call this Daniel Parker's two-seed doctrine.) Adam represents the flesh and spirit of Antichrist, and Christ represents the Spirit of God. " And so it is writ- ten, the first man Adam was made a living soul ; the last Adam was made a quickening Spirit. " — I Cor. xv. 45. " The first man is of the earth, earthy ; the second man is the Lord from heaven." — I Cor. xv. 47. These two personages, or representatives of the flesh and spirit, both had wives or brides, and each one's wife or bride was in his own person before there was any development of either ; and the first Adam's wife was taken out of his side, and given to him for a help-meet, (Gen. ii. 18,) and Adam lived with her, and no other ; and, in like manner, the wife or bride of Jesus Christ was chosen in him before the world began, and was given to him for a spiritual help-meet, and he lives with her, and no other ; and in time is developed by God sending forth the Spirit of His love into their hearts, crying, "Abba, Father."— Gal. iv. 6. "All that the Father giveth me shall come to me, and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out. For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of Him that sent me ; and this is the Father's will which sent me, that of all which He hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day." — John vi. 37, 38, 39. The above Scriptures, with many other passages, de- scribe the wife or bride of Jesus Christ; and he lives in the A CONTROVERSY. 81 hearts of those that the Father gave him ; and they are his wife, or bride ; and he does not live or abide, in a spiritual sense, with any other ; and he dare not live or abide with any other, spiritually, no matter how much he may will to do so with his fleshly will or Adamic nature ; for he came down from heaven, not to do his own will (as quoted above), but the will of the Father that sent him. Jesus, no doubt, had the same will that you and I have, sin excepted, and would have saved the whole race of man if it had been the will of the Father ; just as you and I would do ; but he came not to do this, but to do the will of the Father ; and said that of him- self he could do nothing. If the whole human family had been given to Jesus for a bride, and had been chosen in him before the foundation of the world, it stands as a certainty that the Universalists are correct ; for, as quoted above, of all that the Father has given him he shall lose nothing. He certainly did die for the sins of the whole human family, in a temporal and moral sense, but especially did he die for the believer. (I Tim. iv. 10.) " Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect, for they are not all Israel which are of Israel ; neither because they are the seed of Abraham are they all chil- dren; but in Isaac shall thy seed be called. That is, they which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God ; but the children of the promise are counted for the seed." — Eom. ix. 6, 7, 8. This is what our friend Eed calls Daniel Parker's two- seed doctrine ; for which we pity his obtuse spiritual vision ; when 82 A CONTROVERSY. God has emphatically called special attention to the dif- ference in the two seeds. Again: "For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God, according to election, might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth, it' was said unto her (Rebecca), The elder shall serve the younger ; as it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated. " — Rom. ix. 11, 12, 13. What stronger language could Paul have used in showing the eternal purpose and foreknowledge of God ? Again: " So then, it is not of him that wiileth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy. For the Scripture saith unto Pharaoh : Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might show my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth. There- fore hath He mercy on whom He will have mercy, and whom He will He hardeneth." — Rom. ix. 16, 17, 18. We will in conclusion illustrate our position with the allegory of the potter's clay, and make ourself so legible that every sane man who is not a religious fanatic or in- fidel will be compelled to understand us. " Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honor and another unto dishonor?" — Rom. ix. 21. God is the potter, and Adam and Eve the clay, and they and their posterity the vessels. Had Adam and Eve multiplied before the transgression their children would have been good, as they were good. But they violated the command of God, and the whole lump of clay was leavened with the leaven of sin ; hence they A CONTROVERSY. 83 and their natural posterity are sinners, the children par- taking of the nature of their progenitors. All their pos- terity being sinners by nature, they naturally imbibe the spirit of Antichrist, or self emulation, as soon as they arrive by age and reason to the years of moral accounta- bility. And the vessels of mercy remain in this condition until a stronger man, the spirit of grace, takes possession of the vessel, (Luke xi. 21, 22,) and holds the house or ves- sel, at the expense of a heavy suit, for supremacy with the spirit of Antichrist, its former occupant, (Rom. vii. 22, 23 : ) while "the vessels of wrath, fitted to destruction," (Eom. ix. 22,) are not made susceptible to the reception of the spirit of grace, but are made and fitted to destruc- tion ; and the vessels of mercy prepared by the Potter (God) for glory, (Eom. ix. 23,) but occupied for a time by the spirit of Antichrist, are made susceptible to the reception of the spirit of grace, and are saved in the res- urrection because of their contents ; and the vessels of wrath are lost, owing to their contents. It is the inter- nal and not the external qualifications that make the man, as taught in Masonry. So it is with the vessels of wrath and the vessels of mercy — they are destroyed or saved because of their contents, and not because of any fleshly difference. The vessels of wrath are not injured by God bestowing His special favors upon the vessels of His choice, for He surely has a legal right to do as He will with His own. And He gives to the vessels of wrath equal moral, legal and social rights with the vessels of mercy. 84 A CONTROVERSY. If this be " two-seedism " and " fatalism/' as asserted by Mr. Ked and his arminian cohorts, Paul and all the Apostles were " two-seeders " and "fatalists ;" and they were not at fault, for Jesus taught it to them, and the Father taught it to Jesus ; and you dare not reply against God. (Eom. ix. 20.) All sane men who are not religious fanatics know that the theory of man's spiritual free agency is a popular farce. If God did not know from the beginning who would be saved, and who would be lost, for heaven's sake tell us what He did know, and what He did not know, and where His knowledge commenced, and where it ended. And if He foreknew all things, can all the powers of earth, hell and heaven prevent a thing from happening that He knew would take place? or make something come to pass that He did not foreknow ? For advocating the above doctrine, Mr. Eed accuses us of ingeniously covering up a deformed child, and calls it Daniel Par- ker's two-seed doctrine, when it is in fact Bible two-seed doctrine. We with shame reproach ourself for indulging too freely with our friends in the sin of levity, but would much prefer to indulge in the sin of irony, which Mr. Eed is pleased to call gas, than to pervert the word of God for the sake of money and popularity, and then be- come ashamed of our true name, " hireling," and at- tempt to steal the name, Primitive Baptist, to cover our shame. A CONTROVERSY. 85 Note. — We here enclose in parenthesis a portion of our article, that the modesty of our friend, R. T. Milner, editor of the Henderson Times, refused to publish, believing that it might be detrimental to the inter- ests of his very popular paper. He further believed that it would injure us professionally, for which we extend thanks and commendations . S. M. C. (We would not so much blame our friend Eed for act- ing "hireling," and selling his religion to the people, if he was dealing in a genuine article ; but it is spurious, and therefore demoralizing ; and it is represented in the Scriptures as being the Wine of the old mother of har- lots ; and at his revival meetings we have seen him and his dupes get drunker upon it than we ever saw an Old Baptist get upon mean whiskey at a Georgia corn- shucking. All the so-called Christian institutions that were ever instituted by man, and not begotten of Jesus Christ nor recorded in the Scriptures of divine truth, are religious bastards, and are akin by affinity and spiritual consan- guinity to the daughters of the old mother of harlots, (false churches ) and are not legitimate Christian chil- dren, having been begotten of the spirit. of Antichrist and born of the daughters of the old harlot, false churches. And when false churches eat, drink, sleep, and commit religious fornication together, they are sure to beget children of their own likeness, such as mission- ary boards, executive committees, theological schools, Sunday schools, to set their children's teeth on edge. 86 A CONTROVERSY. " The fathers have eaten bout grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge." — Ezekiel xviii. 2. Prayer schools, (known as young men's prayer meet- ings, to teach then young converts how to pray eloquent- ly, as though the Lord was not able to dictate to them how and what to pray for.) Temperance societies, (un- furling their temperance banners and parading through the streets of villages, towns and cities, making a great display ; boasting of the marvelous works that they are doing for the Lord, in helping Him to convert and save the people : when, indeed, they are forcing then* weak minded inebriates (who care nothing for their oaths nor honor) behind the screens and into then closets (to escape detection) to perjure themselves, by violating their pledges. Many other so-called religious societies and contribution schemes might be cited, such as missionary hen's, etc., but we desist : all of which is a violation of the pattern of Christ, and has been instituted by the in- genious soft-handed gentry, known as the clergy, who attain to arrogance and high living by holding out their soft hands, and lisping with their sweet and cunningly devised articulations, that "We must have an assess- ment, brethren and friends, and we do hope that there is not one in the congregation that will be so uncouth as to refuse to contribute to the treasury of the Lord.'' Many other similar expressions and propositions are made, which are calculated to embarrass those who are not willing to contribute to the missions of Antichrist. The poor old woman that is said in the Scriptures to A CONTROVERSY. 87 have given a penny, is often alluded to, until the poor, silly old women of the community are induced to rob the inmates of their families, of socks, chickens, eggs, butter, etc., to procure money to secure the arrogance and happiness of this soft-handed gentry, who have with their cunningly devised stratagem induced them to be- lieve that if they did not give to those noble soul-saving machines, thousands of the heathen would die and go to hell for want of the gospel, and that they themselves stood a fair chance to apostatize and be finally lost for neglect of duty. We have many times seen several of the daughters (false churches) unite in what they call a union meeting, and continue for days. Such meetings are generally the mother of much religious offspring ; and when the little ones begin to usher into existence, they and their progenitors all get drunk upon the wine of the fornication of their old mother (Rev. xvii.), and when drunk, they throw much dust into the air, and cry out, as it were, "Great is Diana of the Ephesians." — Acts xix. 28.) In trying to follow the religious perambulations of Mr. Red, we are reminded of how difficult it is to track a goat, to ascertain which way he is going, both ends of his feet being the same size. Mr. Red has it wonderfully mixed ; he first has it grace before works, and then has it works before grace ; you can and you can't, you shall and you shan't ; both ends of his religious feet being the same size. S6 A CONTROVERSY. ' • The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge.'' — Ezekiel xviii '2. Prayer schools, (known as young men's prayer meet- ings, to teach then young converts how to pray eloquent- ly, as though the Lord was not able to dictate to them how and what to pray for.) Temperance societies, (un- furling their temperance banners and parading through the streets of villages, towns and cities, making a great display : boasting of the marvelous works that they are doing for the Lord, in helping Him to convert and save the people : when, indeed, they are forcing then weak minded inebriates (who care nothing for their oaths nor honor) behind the screens and into then closets (to escape detection) to perjure themselves, by violating their pledges. Many other so-called religious societies and contribution schemes might be cited, such as missionary hen's, etc., but we desist : all of which is a violation of the pattern of Christ, and has been instituted by the in- genious soft -handed gentry, known as the clergy, who attain to arrogance and high living by holding out their soft hands, and lisping with their sweet and cunningly devised articulations, that "We must have an assess- ment, brethren and friends, and we do hope that there is not one in the congregation that will be so uncouth as to refuse to contribute to the treasury of the Lord/' Many other similar expressions and propositions are made, which are calculated to embarrass those who are not willing to contribute to the missions of Antichrist. The poor old woman that is said in the Scriptures to A CONTROVERSY. 87 have given a penny, is often alluded to, until the poor, silly old women of the community are induced to rob the inmates of their families, of socks, chickens, eggs, butter, etc., to procure money to secure the arrogance and happiness of this soft-handed gentry, who have with their cunningly devised stratagem induced them to be- lieve that if they did not give to those noble soul-saving machines, thousands of the heathen would die and go to hell for want of the gospel, and that they themselves stood a fair chance to apostatize and be finally lost for neglect of duty. We have many times seen several of the daughters (false churches) unite in what they call a union meeting, and continue for days. Such meetings are generally the mother of much religious offspring ; and when the little ones begin to usher into existence, they and their progenitors all get drunk upon the wine of the fornication of their old mother (Eev. xvii.), and when drunk, they throw much dust into the air, and cry out, as it were, " Great is Diana of the Ephesians." — Acts xix. 28.) In trying to follow the religious perambulations of Mr. Red, we are reminded of how difficult it is to track a goat, to ascertain which way he is going, both ends of his feet being the same size. Mr. Eed has it wonderfully mixed ; he first has it grace before works, and then has it works before grace ; you can and you can't, you shall and you shan't ; both ends of his religious feet being the same size. 88 A CONTROVERSY. A few of our good natured friends think our language a little harsh ; but an old homespun proverb is, to " fight the devil with fire," and we feel it to be our duty to re- proach the devil when he attempts to slander the word of God or the church of Christ, even at the sacrifice of friends.— Mat. xix. 29 ; Mark x. 29, 30. Mr. Eed is correct in some of his historical quotations from Elder Trott and Dr. Watson, but, as usual, has woefully misconstrued them. The Old Baptists did not secede from the apostolic mode of missions, nor did they secede from the so-called missionaries, because they themselves were not missionaries ; but because the so- called modern missionaries had left the old landmarks, and were running after new gods and new patents. The Old Baptists being in the minority at many places, were compelled to set up for themselves, to get back to the apostolic mode of missionaries. According to Mr. Bed's purity of reasoning, the majority is theologically correct, regardless of corruption. The Old Baptists, in order to be distinguished from this body of corruption, took the name of Primitive Bap- tists, and the modern so-called missionaries called them- selves Missionaries. But prior to the split, they r were not known as Old Baptists, nor Missionary Baptists, but Baptists. Mr. Red is in principle to-day in open communion with all the daughters of the old harlot, in his missionary boards, executive committees, theological schools, etc., the Sabbath school being the fairest and the most lovely A CONTROVERSY. 89 of all the daughters of the old harlot, and at whose shrine the old woman and her other daughters, with arrogance and exultation gracefully bow, but without any " Thus saith the Lord," and all that Mr. Eed differs from them in is in name. While the Old Baptists are strictly in accord with the apostolic Missionaries, and have a " Thus saith the Lord " for all they do in a church capacity, without any of Mr. Bed's new patents. Again, if Mr. Eed is correct in his reasonings, the ancient Christians who rebelled against Catholicism, and had to seek caves, dens, and the wilderness for refuge, were certainly wrong, theologically, they being a small faction. Again, when Elder Eoger Williams rebelled against the law church that was wont to be established in the original colonies, and who was exiled for his re- ligious opinions to the island of Ehode Island, and who afterwards constituted the first Baptist church that was ever organized upon American soil, was surely wrong, according to Mr. Bed's system of reasoning. And to the Old Baptists, the people of this great com- monwealth are much indebted to-day for the liberties they now enjoy ; and why ? Because the first Washing- ton Cabinet drafted the Constitution of the United States from the Constitution of the first Baptist church of Amer- ica, drawn up by Elder Eoger Williams, it being strictly democratic. For want of space we cannot reply to all of Mr. Bed's hallucinations and accusations against his so- called Anti-missionary Baptists; but we are ready to acquiesce in his historical quotations in the last part of 90 A CONTROVERSY. his essay, and challenge hirn to show in any part of his quotations where the original Baptists ever put them- selves up to the highest bidder to go and preach the gos- pel, or where they accepted a stipulated salary for minis- terial services ; but they were always content with the contributions that the laity and friends bestowed upon them, after apostolic usages ; just as the Old Baptists do to-day (we do not mean his kind ;) and when they see the necessity of sending one of their ministers on a mis- sionary tour, the money is promptly raised to bear the probable expenses, without any great ado, such as mis- sionary hens, whose eggs are to be preserved, hatched and sold, for the spread of the gospel ; and other mis- sionary menageries, such as admission fee festivals, Sun- day school celebration, bogus auctions at Christmas trees in their churches, etc., all of which is a reproach upon the church of Christ, and has been instituted by Mr. Eed's kind of missionaries. With many thanks to the editor of the Henderson Times for his courtesy in giving space to our articles, I am. Very respectfully, M. CABLTON. paet in. DIAGRAM OF THE Christian and Anti-Christian Churches. Illustrated by a Supposed Interview Between the Armenian's All- Wise and Omnipotent God of the Universe, and Mr. Eed and his Armenian Cohorts. Having been denied the privilege of redeeming a promise through the medium of the Henderson Times, of furnishing our readers a diagram of the Christian and Anti-Christian churches, we here insert a few of the characteristic elements of the churches under considera- tion, drawing such characteristic lines of discrimination, that the casual observer will be compelled to see the dis- crepancy. And in drawing our diagram, we may hold up the fallacy of Mr. Eed, and expose him to "public gaze," as he proposed to expose our article. And sup- pose that we bring a blush to the tinted cheek of the smiling countenance of our friend Eed, and cause "his 92 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. Irish blood" to become exasperated; "but he knows us so well.'- " and knows that there is a certain amount of gas that we are compelled to get sliet of, or explode," that we feel safe in presuming upon his charity, and feel that he will throw the veil of charity over our foibles, and do us no harm ; for we fully intend to present him with a copy of our work, should we succeed in getting our book before the public. SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. Ae^itnta^'s God. — Mr. Eed & Co. : I am glad to meet you thus alone, that we may freely, but privately and socially, discuss the great errors and truths of the Bible. You are surely aware of my intelhgence, and that I have made you rational, intelligent and accountable beings, and capable of securing eternal salvation, if you will only accept the terms of salvation, which are entirely optional with all mankind. You know that as a rational God, I could not have had it otherwise, and been a just God. You further know that you must act in such a way as to merit the confidence and esteem of your superiors before you can expect to obtain favors from them. It is just so with me. I would feel very ungrateful to my cause to accept sinners into glory, and bestow special favors upon them who had never done anything to promote my Spiritual Kingdom : and reject others for some trivial offense, who had done many good works for the promo- SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 93 tion of my cause. Such a thing would be sacrilege, and is not in accordance with my character. Bed cc Co. — Most Holy Father, we are so thankful that you have condescended to interview us. and confirm the doctrine that we have so long cherished, and believed with all our hearts ; although there are many Scriptures that conflict with this theory, and Scriptures that make you the author of sin. and that you save souls regardless of merit, and that you made the devil, etc.. and we have made many efforts to believe it. because it was in the Bible : but since we have met face to face, we see that there is something wrong about it, and we much desire that you proceed further to disabuse our minds. Aemtvia^'s God. — I am aware that Moses, Isaiah. St. John, Paul, and John in Eevelation. and these old Pre- destinarian Baptists of the present day. all hold out this idea, beside many others of the old Prophets and Apos- tles : but I tell you. my friends, they are wrong. I have been misrepresented and slandered by them. Even my own Son. Jesus Christ, has written and had his so-called inspired writers to hand down from generation to gener- ation a system of fatalism and decrees unauthorized by me. that would seemingly make me the author of evil, as well as the author of good ; which you know would be inconsistent. The very idea is preposterous, to sup- pose that I would create an evil spirit, known as the devil, to antagonize my spirit of love and mercy, and take the chances against this spirit of evil, that is ever ready to beguile souls and send them to everlasting per- 94 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. dition. I am not only accused of creating evil, but of putting it upon an equality with my spirit of love and mercy, which would give it the same chance to destroy souls that my Holy Spirit has to save them. Now every one of my intelligent creatures knows that I would not have made such a spirit as this, and put it in direct op- position to my love and mercy ; because you know that I want the whole human family saved ; and I would not be a just God if I did not want them all saved. And then, to accuse me of creating a spirit that would, be- yond a doubt, destroy a part of the souls that I desire so much to save ! My friends, such an idea is too absurd to be entertained for a moment, and is an accusation upon my wisdom in the creation, to even suppose that I would have made such a spirit. Therefore you must certainly know that this evil spirit, or the devil, is as old as I am, and equally self -existing, and therefore possesses creative powers, and disregards me and my cause. And when my earthly son, Adam, apostatized, and in him all of his posterity were deluged in the same cate- gory of sin, giving me and my cause away to Satan, since which time it has been one of my greatest efforts, together with all the missionaries that I could induce to help me, to get even a few to depart from this evil one and be saved ; notwithstanding the fact that I want them saved so bad. If I had only known that Adam was so fickle and unstable, and that he was going to give me away as he did, I would not have made him a free agent *as I did, and given him the law that I did ; but 1 verily SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 95 thought that Adam would not betray the confidence that I reposed in him, when I gave him the law and left him in the garden. But Adam and I are to some extent ex- cusable ; neither of us having any experience at the time as to the stratagem of the devil. And I Vili ven- ture the assertion that this evil spirit, the devil, was lying in wait, watching the opportunity of my absence to do his devilish work. I will venture another asser- tion : that if Adam and I could have the thing over again, we would act very differently ; for we have long since seen our folly. Adam's whole posterity could have now been happy together through all the ages of the world, had it not been for this blunder. You will please pardon me for quoting to you a few of the accusations and assertions of those so-called inspired Prophets and Apostles, that these old fogy Predestin- arian Baptists are so tenaciously contending for: "I form the light and create darkness ; I make peace and create evil : I the Lord do all these things." — Is. xlv. T. Now, my friends, you know that old Isaiah was mis- taken about this matter. How could I be the just God that I propose to be and be the author of evil, or the devil, that is trying to destroy all the souls of men, that I so much desire to save ? These Old Baptists are not so much to blame, after all ; for they fully believe that old Isaiah was commanded to write what he did, and that I am its author. I am very sorry that the old man did not discover his mistake before it was too late. The only chance that I 96 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. see now to stop this old fogy influence, (for it is rapidly on the increase, although I have had it proclaimed through the medium of my missionaries that as soon as a few more of these old fogies, such as Beebe, Johnson, and othens, died, this element would dwindle into insig- nificance ; but in this I now see that I was mistaken) is to put more missionaries in the field, increase our treas- ury, and re-translate the Bible every few years, until we can by degrees leave out these unauthorized paragraphs, in such a way that it will escape the detection of these illiterate old fogies ; for you may be sure that I regret the mistakes that many of those old writers made, as well as the errors of the translators of King James. Again, " All things were made by Him, [God] and without Him was not anything made that was made." — John i. 3. You can here see that there is another mistake made, even in the lifetime of my Son Jesus Christ ; and the strange part of it is, that he did not correct the error, and let the people know that I was not the author of evil. But instead thereof, he actually encourages them in this strange babbling. Again, one Paul, who was a learned man, and I suppose that he thought himself to be very smart, turned to be Old Bap- tist and apostle, and got to be very eloquent, and notor- ious among the old fogies. And in his perverted letter to the Colossians, he gets very eloquent, and says, "For by Him [God] were all things created that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers : SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 97 all things were created by Him and for Him ; and He is before all things, and by Him all things consist." — Col. i. 16, 17. Now, my friends, this man Paul claims to have writ- ten from inspiration, and he has left nothing that the imagination can think of that he does not claim me to be the author of. And strange as it may appear to your intelligences, near the latter part of the quotation, he says that I made it for myself. And evil is certainly one of the things that " consist," and is the dominion of the devil. Now, my friends, in the name of common sense, rea- son, and everything that is sacred, what use could I have had for this evil, or devil ? am I to be accused by this Paul of creating an element of sin, to perplex and annoy me from generation to generation, that is ever ready to thwart my programme of saving souls ? And many times, in spite of all that I and my missionaries can do, the devil robs us of our loved ones, and casts them into outer dark- ness ; when you know, from the very nature of things, that I desire the salvation of all men. And then to be accused by this Paul and these Old Baptists of making the adversary of souls for myself! My friends, it is an insult to my character, and I wish you missionaries to redouble your energies, and I will help you all I can to evangelize the world, and we will continue to get out our New Translations every few years, until we wipe out the memory of the perversions of Paul and these Old Baptists, and then we can save the people in spite of Satan. 98 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. Again, in the book of Revelation, the writer, John, gets very humble, and accuses me. And these Old Baptists, as usual, are ready to swallow every word of it. He says : " Thou art worthy, Lord, to receive glory, and honor, and power ; for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created." — Rev. iv. 11. Can you imagine, my friends, what pleasure I could pos- sibly have in the devil ? For that wicked spirit is surely one of the all things ; yet I am accused by John of mak- ing him for my pleasure. It seems that those old Pro- phets and Apostles, and these Old Baptists, are delighted in their accusations against me and my missionaries. And my advice to you, my friends, is to be patient, yet zealous, and I will be with you in your efforts, and before another century rolls around we will so mystify the pres- ent translation of King James, with our new editions, that we will annihilate this old f ogyism from the face of the earth. For old Beebe and Johnson are now dead, and many others of the old veterans will soon die, and in the meanwhile we will try to kill out their influence before new ones grow up to take their places. One other thing I wish to call your attention to before we leave this part of the subject. I am not only accused by those old writers, of making or creating these wicked things for my own pleasure and glory, but these Old Bap- tists are in perfect harmony with them. They say that I was compelled to make or create evil, in order to have good : and that I was compelled to have a hell, in order to have a heaven : and that I was obliged to have bad SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 99 men, in order to have good men ; and that devils were a necessity, in order to have saints ; and that I could not have affirmatives, without having negatives ; and that I could not have one without the other ; and that I was compelled to make both, in order to make a display of my power, wisdom, goodness and mercy, by contrasting the one with the other. And I tell you, my friends, they make a plausible argument of this thing, and it is going to be a difficult task for us to refute this argument ; and the only way that we can sustain our theory, is to posi- tively deny the authorship of these negatives, and con- tend that we are only the author of the good ; that we did not make the devil, and that the devil is the author of the bad ; and that the devil is self -existing, and that he possesses creative powers. I know that this makes the devil my equal, but I had rather acknowledge that he is my equal, than to be accused of creating these wicked things. Red & Co. — Our God, we are wonderfully pleased with thee, and desire to render praise and adoration to thee for- ever, for the great favor that thou hast just bestowed upon us, in that of correcting those mysterious errors that have been such an enigma through all ages, which the wisest and most philosophical minds could not comprehend and reconcile the inconsistency. But we are now satisfied that the doctrine that we and our spiritual ancestors have so long cherished and contended for is true, as we have now heard it from thine own mouth ; otherwise we might have remained in doubt, thinking that possibly those old 100 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. writers and these Old Baptists might be correct. For we will tell you of a truth, that the weakest of these Old Baptist ministers, when attacked by our ablest divines and religious philosophers, will quote a few passages from old Paul, and others of his persuasion, and for the life of us we cannot apply English literature to it in such a way as to make it mean anything, only what they say it does ; and they actually put our wisest men to flight, and bring reproach upon us, notwithstanding the incon- sistency of the whole of their theory. These Old Baptists are actually vain enough to claim that we are spiritually blind, and that we have eyes and see not, that we have ears and hear not, and that we have a heart and cannot understand ; and they are egotistic over it, and claim that they have the Scriptures to sustain them in their assertions, and say that this is the reason why we do not understand the Scriptures as they do. They further say that you have made special appointments from all etern- ity, and that at your own appointed time, and in your own appointed way, you will throughout eternity com municate this spiritual wisdom to these favored ones, and withhold these special favors from others, who are just as good by nature as these favored ones, and in many instances far better by practice. Such an inconsistency is very ridiculous to our minds. For it does seem that these special favors should be bestowed upon those who were trying to do the Master's will, and that justice de- mands this, and that you as a just God would be under ob- ligations to the ones that were doing most for your cause. SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 101 They have gotten up another monstrous inconsistency, and claim that you made a special covenant with your Son Jesus Christ, several thousand years before he was born, and that you gave him a definite number of souls, whose names were all enrolled or recorded in Jesus Christ before the world began, and that Jesus Christ re- presents the Lamb's Book of life, and that it would be a violation of contract for you to grant these special fav- ors to any others except those that you specially coven- anted with your Son Jesus to give him ; but that you be- stowed common favors upon all alike. Now, sir, these Old Baptists can with apparent ease turn to these Script- ures that they say sustain their theory, and with all of our efforts we have failed to refute their arguments, and we much desire your assistance in helping us to correct these errors, for we feel that we are surely correct in our theory. Armenian's God. — I certainly feel under obligations to assist you all that I can in this dilemma. Had I been a little more careful in the beginning, and given this mat- ter my special attention, as I should have done, many of these so-called Scriptures would have read very dif- ferent. Soon after the creation, when Adam committed the blunder of disobeying my command, entailing sin upon his whole posterity, I at once saw from the character of Satan, with his allurements, that he would entice with cunningly devised stratagem the last one of the promised posterity of Adam, to leave me and my cause, and follow 102 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. him into endless perdition. And to prevent the entire loss of my loved ones, (for I made them for my own glory) I selected a few of those ancient men who hap- pened to be prudent enough to believe me as I thought, and 1 induced them with special promises to espouse my cause and assist me in trying to reclaim the others, who were so tenaciously cemented to Satan and to the love of his cause, that I could do nothing with them, without help ; and even then we did not succeed as I had ex- pected. I then decided upon another plan, which I verily thought would be a success. And I promised those pru- dent men that I would beget a son by the Virgin Mary, and that through the medium of prophecy I would promise the people the help of a Savior in the person of my Son Jesus Christ, who should be a mediator between them and the sin of their federal head, Adam, that had been entailed upon them ; and that this Savior should suffer and die to atone for the sins of the whole human family, without any distinctions or specialties, so that all could have an equal chance to be saved from endless perdition, if they would. I therefore appointed some prophets, and continued to appoint prophets from gener- ation to generation, until the appointed time for the coming of my Son Jesus Christ, and instructed them as precise as I could how and what to prophesy for ; and in many instances they carried out the mandates of my orders ; but in other instances they have misinterpreted my meaning, and have prophesied for a system of special favors to a select few throughout all eternity, when I SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 103 fully intended that the death of my Son, Jesus Christ, should atone for the sins of the whole human family, without any distinctions, so that the way might be made possible for me to extract my loved ones from the grasp of Satan, and save them as I first intended. But I sup- pose that those old prophets thought, from the fact of special appointments being made to them to assist me in this great work, which had up to this time baffled my skill, that I was going to keep up special favors to a few select persons through all eternity, and therefore wrote it this way, by failing to understand me ; for I fully intended to save the whole human family through the mediation and death of my Son. But in this I was again disap- pointed by not giving my -special attention to the head notes of those old prophets ; for instead of writing a special promise to all men through the atonement of Jesus Christ, as I had instructed them, they made a special promise to a few, as I did when I selected them to prophesy and assist me. Having been thwarted again in my programme, I determined that as soon as my Son was born, and arrived at proper age to receive instruc- tion, I would not let the opportunity pass to fully in- struct him as to my wishes. I therefore waited until the appointed time of his advent, and as soon as he was com- petent of receiving instruction I communicated to him my entire will, and even put my Holy Spirit in him ; and I supposed, with my Spirit in him, that it would be im- possible for him to commit an error ; and I do not believe that he would, had he not, perchance, got hold of those 104 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. old manuscripts written by those old prophets. And my opinion is, that as soon as he read them, he at once imbibed the idea, and became infatuated with it, and be- lieved me to be its author. He very soon got himself up a corps of apostles, and he and his apostles preached and duplicated the same doctrines, as did those old prophets, and claimed it as an inspired message to this favored few ; much to my mortification and disgust. Since which time these old predestinarian Baptists have im- bibed the same doctrine, and are actually preaching and teaching it to-day. But I assert to you that I did not authorize such a doctrine to be preached ; and the only alternate that I now see to extinguish this theory is through the medium of my missionaries and our new editions of the Bible ; for we have been thwarted in every other effort that we have made. I now propose to quote to you a few more of these un- authorized paragraphs of Scripture, and show you their inconsistency : " And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called accor- ding to His purpose. For whom He did foreknow, He also did predestinate to be conformed to the image of His Son, that he might be the first born among many brethren. Moreover, whom He did predestinate, them He also called ; and whom He called, them He also justi- fied ; and whom He justified, them He also glorified. What shall we then say to these things ? If God be for us, who can be against us ? " — Eom. viii. 28, 32. SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 105 "For I am persuaded that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. " — Eom. viii. 38, 39. I would here advertise you, my friends, to notice care- fully the enormity of this harangue, written by this learned man, Paul, who claims to have been moved by the spirit of inspiration to write to the churches at Borne and other places. And in all of his messages of love to the churches he has failed to make a good promise to any except these favored ones, who, he says, I foreknew, called, predestinated, elected, justified, glorified, etc. And in the last part of the quotation he says that they cannot be separated from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. Now, my friends, this is a powerful accusation against me. Do you suppose that I would have created a set of human beings, and had their posterity in embryo, and selected out of them, according to the theory of fore- knowledge, a certain few to be saved with an everlasting salvation, and with the same foreknowledge know that the others would be lost in endless perdition ? Yet this man, Paul, actually teaches this doctrine in all of his letters to his churches. And these Old Baptists of the present day positively feast upon it and agree with Paul in ridi- culing the doctrine of my missionaries, and say with Paul, "For I bear them record that they have a zeal of 106 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW God, but not according to knowledge. For they, being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God. For Christ is the end of the law [works] for righteousness to every- one that believeth. " — Eom. x. 2, 4. I appeal to your intelligences, and propound to you a few interrogations, by way of deriding this old fogy idea of old Paul, and these Old Baptists. Suppose that you are the father of one dozen children whose mother is your legitimate wife. Could you possibly know any dif- ference in them according to parental affection ? Could you disinherit either of them in the division of your estate, on the flimsy pretext of election ? Or could you presume to punish one, two, or half of them, with the rod, the balance of their natural lives, who had by nature become refractory or wayward in their obedience to your mandates ? Of course you will all answer nega- tively. Yet old Paul and these Old Baptists indirectly say that the creature, man, is more merciful than his Creator, and accuse me of doing things that are within the province or prerogative of my spiritual dealings with my creatures, that they themselves would not presume to do, as a matter of conscience. O ! the heights and depths of the ignorance of these old fogies, and how to relieve the country of their pestifer- ous dogmas is something that I cannot fathom, while the present translation is recognized. For when my mission- aries attempt to overpower them with arguments, and SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. lOf appeal to common sense, and natural reason, they at once say that my missionaries cannot see nor understand, "Be- cause the carnal mind is enmity against God ; for it is not subject to the law of G-od, neither indeed can be. So then, they that are in the flesh cannot please God." — Rom. viii. 7, 8. " But the natural man receivethnot the things of the Spirit of God ; for they are f oolishness unto him : neither can he know them, because they are spirit- ually discerned." — I Cor. ii. 14. You can readily see from this, that old Paul and these Old Baptists have an exalted opinion of their supernat- ural intellect in spiritual things over my missionaries. And when my missionaries call in question their vanity, they at once reject self, and give to me all the glory, honor, praise and power, and that of themselves they are nothing but poor, sin-polluted sinners, deserving the fiery indignation of my wrath, if I had meted out justice, in- stead of mercy to them. They then appeal to the writ- ings of Paul and his cohorts, and prove that these special favors of my grace or favor were bestowed upon them without merit, and that their spiritual minds were thus illuminated by the light of my favor or grace shining in- to their dark and benighted hearts, giving them acute- ness of spiritual vision over the capacity of my mission- aries in spiritual things, and therefore give me all the glory ; and claim none for themselves. And with those old writers, who are of the same per- suasion of these Old Baptists, and who are ever ready to come to the rescue of these Old Baptists with their ab- 108 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. stract paragraphs of election, predestination, and final perseverance, they soon put my missionaries to flight, notwithstanding the intelligence and justice of our cause. Only listen to them for a few moments, and see how they rivet their doctrine upon you, and leave you no get- ting out place, with their version of the present transla- tion, although we know it to be mere fiction : "For by grace are ye saved, through faith ; and that not of your- selves ; it is the gift of God. Not of works, lest any man should boast. For we are His workmanship, creat- ed in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them." — Eph. ii. 8, 9, 10. " And if by grace, then it is no more of works ; other- wise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace ; otherwise work is no more work. What then! Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for ; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded (according as it is written, God hath given them the spirit of slumber, eyes that they should not see, and ears that they should not hear,) unto this day. And David saith, Let their table be made a snare, and a trap, and a stumbling-block, and a recompense un- to them : let their eyes be darkened, that they may not see, and bow down their back always. "—Rom. xi. 6, 11. Do you suppose that old Paul thought that he was writing from inspiration when he wrote these paragraphs? Or do you not think that he did it out of curiosity, to be SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 109 odd, and to make a display of what he was pleased to call divine or spiritual inspiration ? Be this as it may, these Old Baptists chuckle, and exult over these Scriptures, and seem to delight in their oddity, which is in perfect keeping with those old writers, and they are so afraid of works, fearing that their salvation will not be reckoned of grace, that they actually refuse to negotiate with the Christian institutions that have been instituted by the various branches of my churches ; and as usual, they always find Scripture that they contend sustains their theory. Only listen at the abstract verses that they produce to prove that our institutions are not authorized by the Bible : "And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven and God hath remembered her iniquities." — Eev. xviii. 4, 5. " Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers; for what fellowship hath righteousness with unright- eousness ? and what communion hath light with dark- ness ? And what concord hath Christ with Belial ? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel ? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols ? for ye are the temple of the living God ; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them, and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing, and I will receive you, ' 110 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. and will be a father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty . " — II Cor. vi. U, 18. These Old Baptists actually claim that our Christian institutions are institutions of the world, and that they are begotten of the spirit of Antichrist, and that they are more for show and display than for the service of God. And that God has never authorized the organization of but one institution, His Church, and that all other so- called Christian institutions and churches that participate in anything that is not in accord with the pattern of the church set up by Jesus Christ, is of the spirit of Anti- christ ; and that they, as followers of Christ, are com- manded to come out from among them, and be a separ- ate people, as admonished by the above quotation. And they are actually presumptuous enough to put the people upon the stool of do-nothing, to sit and wait for me to come and pull them to heaven by the hair of the head. Do you suppose that I am going to force people to heaven whether they wish to go or not ? Of course I want them to go ; but after making them free agents, I would be act- ing in bad faith, as though I had no confidence in their ability, were I to undertake to force them to accept sal- vation. Notwithstanding the plausibility of our argument, my Son Jesus Christ, the old prophets and apostles, and these Old Baptists, all teach, preach and write this doctrine of special favor without merit, and the eternal union of Christ and his bride, (the church,) regardless of good SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. Ill works. But all this does not make it the truth ; for this thing got badly tangled in the beginning, and it does seem that we will never get able to untangle it. They further teach that true and vital religion com- mences in the heart, and that the brain or intellect sym- pathizes with the heart, and that any other theory of religion that is conceived by the brain, from intellect or common sense, is brain religion, notwithstanding natural and moral science teach that the brain must conceive before the heart can be affected. But they are so stupid that we will never be able to beat anything into them that is not in the Bible. Bed & Co. — Our God, we have listened to thee with much patience and admiration, and our bowels have yearned within us, giving thanks and praises to thee. And we now feel a freedom of thought and speech, that we dared not to have uttered in time past ; for the whole bent of our spiritual convictions was in direct opposition to what was called by these old fogies, " The great and fundamental truths of the Bible." And it was so incon- sistent that we could not believe it, although we had to try to preach it, and disguise it the best we could in or- der to make our theory plausible, so as to please the people and cause them to go with us. And even then, with our best efforts and ablest divines, we failed to carry some good men with us, who actually followed these old fogies, because the Scriptures did not particularly specify our Christian institutions, as was the custom of Jesus Christ and his inspired writers in speaking of the church 112 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. of Christ. As though these Christian duties could not be as well understood as to be so specifically expressed in the Bible. But these Old Baptists reject them all, be- cause they are not in the Bible. We are a little surprised at any of them ever marrying their wives or husbands, because they could not find their wives' or husbands' names recorded in the Bible as being their particular wife or husband, as they seem to be such sticklers for Bible testimony. But we are fully satisfied with your explan- ations, and will endeavor to carry out your mandates to the best of our ability, believing that the day will come, when we will destroy their influence and evangelize the world. You have casually mentioned our Christian institu- tions, and from the tenor of your language we can but infer that you heartily indorse them. And we would like for you to more fully explain to us the reasons why they were not put in manuscript by the inspired writers; for. we assure you that they are a great lever in our business of committing and converting souls that would otherwise be lost. Of course we have our opinion about it, but we wish to have it beyond cavil. Was it omitted intentional- ly, thinking that it would be understood ? Or did you for- get to speak of it to your Son Jesus Christ ? Or did he forget to command his apostles to write it ? Or did the apostles refuse to record our Christian institutions, be- cause they would come in contact or conflict with their preconceived opinions of special appointments, of election, predestination, final perseverance, eternal union, etc ? SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 113 Armenian's God.— My friends, these are pertinent ques- tions, and I feel it to be obligatory upon me to fully in- form your minds upon this important subject. I am aware that these institutions are the great bulwarks in saving souls, for without these institutions it would be but a few years until Satan would almost depopulate heaven ; or, at least, he would deter future generations from embracing the great privileges of saving grace through the mediation of our Sunday schools and other Christian institutions that lead sinners to Christ. Al- though my Son Jesus Christ seems to have turned traitor to his own interest, and against my will ; but you know this was caused by his mind being abused in the begin- ning by reading those old manuscripts ; and I suppose that he is, to some extent, like all other human beings, once committed to an error, they are too proud to retract, although you may convince them a thousand times. He says, " Jesus therefore answered and said unto them, murmur not among yourselves. No man can come to me except the Father which hath sent me draw him ; and I will raise him up at the last day." — John vi. 43, 44. These are positive declarations, powerfully implying that there are some that I do not draw to Christ. Paul says, as quoted in another place by me, " And if by grace, then is it no more of works ; otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace ; otherwise work is no more work. What then ? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for ; but the 114 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded. " — Eom. xi. 6, 7. Such ideas as these are ridiculous, my friends. Is not the whole human family mine by creation ? (and would have been mine by salvation, had Adam not given them to Satan, when I made him a free agent,) and do you suppose that I could have favorites among them and not impress them all alike ? No, sirs ; they are free agents, and they are more impressed with the cause of Satan, who has the supremacy over them, and I cannot help myself ; for you know that I would save them if I could, but have delegated the power to them as free agents, and dare not interfere without a breach of contract ; and my only chance to save them is by moral suasion through my missionaries and Christian institutions. The idea of Paul saying that I had blinded some so that they could not see spiritually if they would, is to accuse me of a great evil. I tell you that these Sunday schools have extricated thousands of souls from the grasp of Satan, and saved them from hell. And I care not for the traditional in- fluence of what my Son Jesus Christ and Paul may say. I tell you to go on with the good work, and save the people from perdition, and I will help you all I can. I am sure of one thing, and that is, that I told my Son Jesus Christ to have his apostles record these Christian institutions in the New Testament. But after he and his apostles became infatuated with this doctrine that is so detestable to you and I, and being SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 115 sure that our institutious would conflict with their pre- conceived opinions of election and special appointments, I am sure that they declined or refused to obey my man- dates. But, nevertheless, I tell you they are wrong, and I urge it upon you as my disciples io leave nothing undone that will foster to the salvation of souls ; and your Sunday schools will commit thousands of young and tender minds, and when they are once committed, and arrive at riper years, their pride will cause them to stay with you, rather than be derided and scoffed at as turncoats. These Old Baptists may convince them that the present translation is true, and therefore their theory true ; yet they will stay with you because you are popu- lar and fashionable ; for the fancy of human pride is to stay on the big side ; and numbers, you know, will add much to our treasure and influence in getting out our new translations, and will keep my missionary ministers in neat style, so that they can wield a mighty influence. Although Jesus Christ and his apostles and those Old Baptists all set the same example, in that of wearing common apparel, and in making no big displays in build- ing costly church houses, with elegant cushioned pews, dazzling chandeliers, church organs that belch forth the sweetest melody, when surrounded by our fairest maid- ens and matrons, whose voices are trained to accord with the most delicious notes of the organ, and loud tolling bells to call their elegantly attired saints together ; yet you need not care for any of their old fogy examples, for 116 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. they pride in having all things common ; and, as usual, they have Scripture to the point : "And all that believed were together, and had all things common." — Acts iv. 44. But you know that this common business will not do with the various orders of my missionaries ; for your strength lies in your arrogance and popularity, and not in your following the examples of primitive so-called Christians ; and you know that if you were to presume to adopt these old-time examples, you would lose all your influence and popularity, and these Old Baptists would completely devastate your churches, having all these old fogy Scriptures on their side. Hear how they reprimand you: " For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a poor man in vile raiment, and ye have respect to him that weareth the gay clothing, and say unto him, sit thou here in a good place, and say to the poor, stand thou here, or sit here under my footstool, are ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become judges of evil thoughts ? Hearken, my beloved brethren : Hath not God chosen the poor of this world, rich in faith, and heirs of the kingdom which he hath promised to them that love him ? But ye have despised the poor. Do not rich men oppress you, and draw you before the judgment seats ? " — James ii. % 7. My friends, you know in this age of refinement and decency it would never do to adopt this precedent. Sup- pose that some poor wretch was to come to one of your SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 117 fine city churches with vile and tattered raiment, and your janitor was to conduct him to one of your costly pews ; do you not know that it would be disgrace- ful, and your janitor would lose his situation ? Yet these Old Baptists will conduct such an one to their front seats and seem to regard it as a privilege. I hope to have your kind indulgence, my friends ; for I. have another one of my most grievous trials to relate to you. And after you are fully informed in these great truths, I think you will be better prepared to appreciate the interest that I have taken in you ; and not only this, but when your minds are fully edified you will then be the better able to assist me hereafter. Near the commencement of the fifteenth century, when my missionaries and their institutions were so oppressed in the Old World, and they could see no way of escape from the law church, and other oppressions of taxation, I selected one of the noblest men in the Old World ; I mean noble in intellect and powerful in moral suasion and influence ; I do not mean powerful in wealth, for he was poor, but susceptible of impressions for good, having a warm and sympathizing heart ; and I impress- ed him with the idea of a new world, the limits of which would be boundless for many centuries, for the opera- tions of my missionaries in helping me to save souls. This great and good man was Christopher Columbus, to whose assistance I called the Queen (Isabella), and in order to secure her aid beyond all peradventure I im- pressed her with the great wealth and resources that 118 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. this new world would add to her province. Hence she rendered him all the help that was desired, in that of ships, commissaries, and seamen, to make the voyage across the great briny ocean, where I could locate the various orders of my missionaries, where they could en- joy perfect peace and harmony with each other, and serve me according to the dictates of their own con- science. Of course I arranged things for them to differ widely in their theories of the plan of salvation ; for you know, " And without controversy, great is the mystery of godliness." — I Tim. hi. 16. And while they controvert and quarrel over the nonessentials, and almost get at dagger's point, they all come together on the one thing needful, " Ye must be born again." But this I arranged, that they all should be right in the enjoyment of their own peculiar views. I have labored diligently to convince them of this fact, so that every branch of my missionary churches might hold open commission with each other, and work for the cause of the Master. But, as usual, those old writers and these Old Baptists all come together and widely dif- fer with me. Hear them: "Finally, be ye all of one mind, having compassion one of another: love as brethren, be pitiful, be courteous." — I Peter iii. 8. "I beseech Euodias, and beseech Syntyche, that they be of the same mind in the Lord."— Phil. iv. 2. " Finally, brethren, farewell. Be perfect, be of good comfort, be of one mind, live in peace, and the God of love and peace shall be with you."— II Cor. xiii. 11. "Now I beseech you, SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 119 brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you ; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment." — I Cor. i. 10. "That ye may with one mind and one mouth glorify God, even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ." — Eom. xv. 6. This sounds very different from the way that I have taught my missionaries, and is not the way that my missionaries teach ; for you know, as well as I, that this would cut off all their communion and fellowship for each other. But these Old Baptists teach precisely this way, and declare nonfellowship for anything else, and I do believe that they think they are right. When Coltimbus returned from his voyage, and re- ported the discovery of the new world, (and named it America, in honor of Americus, who was the first man to put foot upon American soil,) with its vast territory and probable resources, my missionaries were rejoiced, and regarded it as a perfect "Bonanza," and determined with my aid to adopt it as their second "Goshen" or "Promised land" and thereby relieve themselves of oppression. But the oppressors came, and after a struggle of many years of toil and loss of blood, they were extricated from their iron grasp by the great soldier statesman, Greo. Washington, whose name you revere. Never did my missionaries expect again to be annoyed with these old predestinarians, such as Paul and these Old Baptists, with their poisonous decrees and fatalisms; 120 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. for such is their theory, according to my conception of their views. But one Eoger Williams lurked into our camps, and commenced teaching and preaching their nefarious doc- trine ; and, strange as it may appear to you, he soon had disciples. And in order to stop his career, before he poisoned the whole country with his miserable heresy, (for he was no fool,) I had him exiled to Rhode Isla?id; but it did no good. He and his disciples soon organized and constituted a church, and it was impossible to stop the spread of their influence ; for the constitution of our then happy country after the declaration of independence (had it not been for them) guaranteed to them the right to worship God according to the dictates $>f their own conscience. And they at once went back to the teachings of Christ and his apostles, and commenced opposing the plans of my missionaries, and induced many good men to fol- low them, on the flimsy pretext that my missionaries had no, " Thus saith the Lord" for their various Christ- ian institutions. My missionaries came to me in their prayers, imploring me for assistance, and I impressed them that it would be best for a large number of them to join the Old Baptist church and swell their number until my missionaries could outvote them in their own church, and in their conferences and deliberations kill them by belonging to them. For they could not con- sistently refuse to be governed by their own liberal de- mocratic constitution, which guaranteed the right to SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 121 rule to the majority. But. my friends, they actually beat my missionaries in this deep laid scheme, and sepa- rated from them, by declaring non-fellowship for them, on account of my missionaries having departed from the old landmarks, and having no "Thus saith the d" fo: their innovations upon primitive doctrine. Bed & Co.— Our God. we deeply sympathize with thee, and our hearts are pained with sorrow, and our bowels yearn with anguish, at your many disappointments in trying to save the souls whom you created for your own glory. And we feel sure that you would have saved and that you still would save many thousand more than you have or will save hereafter, were it not for the in- fluence of Satan, who has. and we fear will ever continue to beguile and decoy souls from your tender care regard- less of your great efforts to save them. And we know that you are not at fault, for you have used every effort up to the present, that the imagination can conceive of. And yet there are thousands who insult the offered terms of salvation, and tenaciously cling to Satan, or to these old predestinarian Baptists, whom we regard as being but a fraction better than Satan, in their decrees and fatalisms. They actually teach that salvation is only for a few. compared with the multitude, and that this few vas seen in the mind of Jehovah before the world began, and that their names were all written in the Lamb's book of life, and that they have a life relationship to Jesus, as well as a spiritual relationship to Christ, and that thev are bone of his bones and flesh of his flesh, and 122 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. that they are members of his body, and that they are his bride, or wife, and that it is impossible to separate them in this world, nor in the world to come ; that this body, wife or bride, typifies the church, and that it is impossible with all of our efforts, to add others thereto or take any therefrom, without hazarding the perfection of the church or bride, of Jesus Christ ; that Christ is as much related to the church, or his bride, as Adam was related to Eve, his bride ; and that Jesus died especially for his spouse, the church, but that He died for the whole human fam- ily in a common or time salvation. They further teach that all along through time this special salvation is manifested to the vessels of mercy, or heirs of promise, who are the predestinated or foreor- dained members of Christ's body, or church ; and that God at His own appointed time, and in His own appointed way, quickens them into spiritual life ; and that after being quickened, they then see the enormity of their sins, which they had never been able to see before, and that they are then loaded down with guilt and condem- nation, and that they then have a travail for deliver- ance resembling the travail of a woman with child, from her conception until her deliverance. They further claim that it is impossible to have a birth with- out a child, and that the child has nothing to do with its conception, travail or birth, neither does it have any- thing to do with putting itself in a condition to be born, naturally nor spiritually, nor does it know that it is a child, until it is born and taught of its natural parents, SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 123 natural things, or born of its heavenly parents and taught spiritual things in the school of heaven, where all the ransomed of the Lord are taught. To prove their position, they refer to the conversation that took place between the Savior and Mcodemus, when the Savior told Mcodemus that he must be born again before he could see the kingdom of G-od. And they only have to ask a few questions to put our wisest divines to flight. And we are mortified and chagrined at the sim- plicity and ease that they seem to have in ridiculing our theory. . Only listen at a few of the interrogatories that they use in controverting the doctrine that we teach : Sirs, do you admit that Jesus used the allegory of the two births, in his conversation with Mcodemus, to illus- trate the spiritual birth ? We do. Do you agree that the two births must be similar, in order to make the analogy a good one, and that Jesus would not have selected an allegory that would not have held good in all of its literal and spiritual bearings ? We do. Well, then, did you have anything to do with your natural conception ? We did not. Did you, of your own volition, do anything in your mother's travail from conception to deliverance to put yourself in a condition to be born naturally ? We did not. Were you the sons of your fathers before you were born ? 124 SUPPOSED ESTER VIEW. We certainly were. Could you iu any way prevent being the sous of your fathers ! We could not. When you were born, were you any more the sons of your fathers than you were before you were born \ We were not. Immediately after you were born, and dining your in- fantile life, were you not entirely helpless ! We were. Did not your mother and muses have to put you to your mother's breast, and put your natural food into your mouths to sustain your natural lives and develop you into manhood \ They did. When you were older were you not able to eat and digest stronger food I We were. Had you not been thus nourished, would you not have died or been natural dwarfs 1 We would. If you had died in infancy would death have kept you from beiug the child of your father \ It would not. Finally, were you not able to feed and nourish your- selves ! We were. Do you believe that the church, to the heaven-born child, is a type of the mother to the natural born child. SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 125 and that the elders, deacons, and members are figures of the muses of the natural born child I We do. Well, sirs, do you not believe that the heaven-born child has to be fed with spiritual food, or. in other words, be indoctrinated by the teachers or nurses of the church, for their development in spiritual strength I We do. Without such spiritual food, do you not think that such a child would be a spiritual dwarf, and therefore dead to any spiritual interest in the church militant \ We do. But would it not still be a child I It would. Do you think, then, that this natural or spiritual food made them natural or spiritual children S We do not. Neither do you believe, then, that this natural or spirit- ual nourishment caused them to be born naturally, nor spiritually, do you \ We do not. Well, sirs, since you have been so kind as to admit that Jesus would not have used an allegory that would not hold good in all its bearings-, naturally and spiritually, we must say to you that you have indeed nailed your theory of free agency to the wall, and that spiritual self- volition must forever trail in the dust, and be numbered among the lost causes. Your accessions in the foregoing interrogatories have 126 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. emblazoned the Old Baptist theory in pompous grandeur over all the isms of man, and set God up as the omni- potent ruler of the universe. " In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose of Him who worketh all things after the counsel of His own will." — Eph. i. 11. You have admitted that the allegory of the two births is a complete one, and that births must be similar to each other, and that there cannot be a child without a father, and that a father implies a child, and that a child has nothing to do with its conception, travail or birth, and that you could not help being the child of your father, and that you were your father's child before you were born, and that being born did not make you your father's child, and that you did not put yourself in a condition to be born, and that you were not able to live of yourself after you were born, and that if you had died in infancy you would have still been the child of your father. Now, sirs, you have never heard of a natural birth without a natural child. We admit that some natural children die in embryo, or in utero (in the mother's womb), but they are nevertheless children. Now, sirs, according to the popular theory that all the human family could be spiritual children and heirs of promise if they would, is to deny all that you have admitted, and say that the natural child actually solicits its own con- ception, travail and birth, and that the spiritual child in like manner is instrumental in its own conception, tra- vail and birth ; and that the allegory of Jesus Christ, as SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 127 portrayed to Nicodemus, is a farce. If the whole human family have an undeveloped foetal spirit in them which they can nourish into spiritual manhood if they will, it stands as a certainty that there are untold millions of spiritual children who have died in spiritual embryo, that have never been regenerated and born again of the Spirit of God, and is a direct denial of God's power to ex- ecute His will in developing them into spiritual existence, and is a contradiction of the Scripture, ' ' Being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ." — Phil. i. 6. Now, sirs, if you contend for the hypothesis that the whole human family have an unde- veloped foetal spirit in them, many of which die in Spiritual embryo, but are nevertheless spiritual children, you at once make the universalist monarch of the relig- ious situation, and your free agency or moral self -volition theory again trails in the dust. Now, sir, these Old Baptists will actually put these questions and arguments to us in such a way that we are compelled to answer them as we have the foregoing interrogatories, or expose our ignorance of analogical and spiritual reasonings. Notwithstanding their stupid- ity in the moral sciences and accepted literature of our advanced age, they always beat us in theology. And we much desire your kind admonitions and advice, for, with the present standard of the Bible, they are so well fortified that we find it impossible to compete with them in argument, and we much fear that ours is a lost cause, 128 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW, with the present translation as our religious text book, although we are so sanguine as to the correctness of our theory. Armenian's God. — My friends, yours is a lamentable condition to be placed in ; and had I have known the dilemma that my former advice was going to lead you into, I should have advised you very different ; but this does not change the correctness of our theory, and I do hope that you will pardon me for thus leading you into an apparent defeat. But indubitable and untiring ener- gy will certainly accomplish any cause that is so just as ours. Although we have to combat against these Old Baptists, and all the old prophets and apostles, and my Son Jesus Christ as their leader, yet there are many en- couragements to stimulate us to press forward and abundantly hope to succeed. " Truth crushed to earth will rise again." So hold up your drooping heads, my friends, and lose no time in the prosecution of the fight to the bitter end, and I will help you all that I can. You know that we have ever been in the majority, even from the days of old to the present time, and have ever been, and always will be popular. Our arrogance and fashion- able society, with our polish of educational lustre, will always lead us to popular victory. And while they may beat us in theology, with the present Bible to aid them, your popular theories will ravish the young and tender minds of their youths, as well as hold the young of your own church nurseries ; and in this way we will be able to deride and rebuke them with their own natural off- SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 129 Spring, and cause them to be chagrined with their own theory. You know that they do not believe in educating their preachers to preach the gospel, which education would give them that glossy polish and popular suavity that my missionaries have. They thereby lose much of their influence among the educated masses, in their peculiar arrangement of syntax. And I would advise you to make all the sneering sport of their literature that you can, without making yourselves ridiculous, and teach your children the same lessons of derision, and allow your children to mock their preachers, and sneer at their theory of the Christian religion, and sport at their abuse of Eng- lish literature, and I tell you of a truth that you will drive many proud spirits away from them that would otherwise embrace their theory ; and we would lose their assessment in our treasury, and many of our most in- fluential preachers would soon become as rough and un- popular as theirs, for want of means to put on style and suavity. And you well know that for my missionaries to preach a popular theory of religion that will please the masses of the people, they must be well paid for it ; for if they study human nature and the Bible, as they should do, so as to mystify these unpopular paragraphs and verses that these Old Baptists delight in so much, they will have no time to do anything else for a living. I know that they say, " But G-od has chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise ; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the i30 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. things which are mighty ; and base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath G-od chosen ; yea, and things which are not, to bring to naught things that are ; that no flesh should glory in His presence." — I Cor. i. 27, 28, 29. "For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the un- derstanding of the prudent." — I Cor. i. 19. But this is sure to be wrong. How can a man preach, which you know is to teach, without brains and literary attainments that will qualify him to teach aright ? These Old Baptists are in possession of much vanity, and with old Paul's experience from nature to grace, and the transition so unexpected to Paul, and entirely un- sought for, they will baffle the logic of the most learned of my missionaries. They all rally around Paul's experience, and say that I teach all true ministers of the gospel in the school of heaven, regardless of earthly literature, and that I never call a preacher to preach the gospel without qualifying him, and that I would not be stupid enough to call a minister to the work of the ministry and then not qualify him with spiritual wisdom for the satisfaction of all those whom the Holy Spirit had prepared to hear with that spiritual understanding that is peculiar to my saints; and that none hear it with that spiritual understanding except regenerated saints, and that the rest are blinded, and cannot hear it, except in a literal sense, and there- fore mock its teachings. They further claim that all the Theological Schools SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 131 that I have impressed my missionaries to establish in these latter days are a religious farce, and have nothing to do with saving souls or the plan of salvation. Now, my friends, you know that this is all absurd. How, in the name of common sense, can the people be saved without they are educated in all the moral sciences, so that they may be able to reason and come to conclusions from analogical standpoints, as to the ways and means of salvation that I have furnished all men, if they will only improve the oportunity that I have put in their reach, through the medium of my missionaries and their institutions ? And how is it possible for an un- educated man, who knows nothing of the derivation of English literature, to preach the gospel or teach it, when he knows nothing of the origin of the language that he talks ? And the idea of my not impressing all the human family alike, and that they cannot accept salvation if they will, and preach the gospel if they will only pre- pare themselves for it, is too absurd for intelligent men and women to entertain for a moment. And I am very sorry indeed that those old writers, and these Old Bap- tists, have gotten up such a theory, for it greatly re- tards our efforts in trying to save the people from ever- lasting perdition. One other thing that I wish to men- tion to you, not because we succeeded so well in it, but because it was such a singular failure. Many years ago I impressed my missionaries to proclaim from the pul- pit and in common parlance, that the Old Baptists were opposed to educating their children in the moral sciences 132 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. and common literature of the day, and that they regard- ed ignorance as one of the chief elements of my special favors in spiritual gifts, etc. All of which has recoiled upon my missionaries, much to their chagrin and morti- fication ; and the false accusation is now deriding them from almost every literary college and school-room in the civilized world, and the sons and daughters of Old Baptists are now leading pupils in all colleges and schools that are not sectarian in their tenets of study, on the American and European continents, and claim that edu- cation is an indispensable boon to the happiness and prosperity of the rising generations in time, but has noth- ing to do with the plan of salvation or the preaching of the gospel, but that education enables the educated min- ister to use more select language in proclaiming the gospel, and exemplifying the Christian religion, and is better able to simplify the meaning of the Scriptures ; but that his education has nothing to do with his spirit- ual gift or call to the ministry, and that the illiterate man of God, who has been called and qualified of God for the ministry, can and does preach the same great truths of salvation by grace as does the educated minister, but not with such chaste language. "For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called." — I Cor. i. 26. "The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul ; the testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple." — Ps. xix. 7. But you know that this would never do with my missionaries. It may suit these old SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 133 fogies to put forward their ignorant, uneducated men, that they say I have called and qualified to teach and preach the unsearchable riches of salvation by grace, in order to confound the intelligence of my missionaries, and bring to naught our intelligent schemes and insti- tutions. Were we to adopt the practice of such ignor- ance, it would certainly destroy the influence of our pop- ular theories, and we would soon become a hiss and a by-word. I regret exceedingly that such a mass of so-called Scriptures should have ever crept into the Xew Testa- ment as the word of inspiration ; for no sane man could suppose for a moment that I would call a fool to preach or teach in such mysterious and divine things. These Old Baptists are presumptuous enough to give me the credit of doing many things in their favor that I am not guilty of, for which I would rebuke them, had I not made them free agents, and dare not interfere. They actually claim that my missionaries are huelings, be- cause they expect pay for preaching, and because they will not serve churches without pay, and say they are after the fleece instead of the flock. ' 'But he that is a hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth, and the wolf catcheth them, and scattereth the sheep. The hireling fleeth because he is a hireling, and careth not for the sheep." — John x. 12, 13. They say that when my missionaries are elected or called as shep- herds to look over or care for a flock (churchy and go in 134 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. and out before them, and give them pasturage in spiritual things, my missionaries claim pay, as does the hirehng ; and that if the flock has a poor fleece, and the hirehng sees poverty and tattered raiment stealing or creeping upon him, (as is peculiar to a majority of God's chosen people) as typified by the creeping wolf upon his prey, the hireling fleeth, because he cares more for the fleece than he does for the flock, and that the wicked spirit that the wolf typifies, scatters the sheep, for want of a leader or shepherd to teach or feed them upon spiritual and divine food. How, in the name of common sense, can a preacher devote his whole time to the preparation of his sermons, so as to edify and please his congregations, and moralize them, and put them in a condition to seek salvation, and receive no pay for it ? Do these Old Baptists expect preachers to go decent so that they will not be a reproach to refined society, raise families in credit, travel and preach the gospel, and sub- sist upon the wind only ? It really appears so from their arguments, and the so-called texts of Scripture that they adduce. Is not the laborer worthy of his hire ? Did not Paul (who is one of their favorite apostles), re- ceive wages ? But, as usual, they always have a getting out place. Only listen at the quotation and its connections, and hear their interpretation of it: "Have I committed an offence in abusing myself that ye might be axalted be- SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. i35 cause I have preached to you the gospel of God freely ? I robbed other churches, taking wages of them, to do you service. And when I was present with you, and wanted, I was chargeable to no man ; for that which was lacking to me, the brethren which came from Mace- donia supplied ; and in all things I have kept myself from being burdensome unto you, and so will I keep myself." — II Cor. xi. 7, 8, 9. "Go your ways; behold I send you forth as lambs among wolves. Carry neither purse, nor scrip, nor shoes, and salute no man by the way. And into whatsoever house ye enter, first say, Peace be to this house ; and if the son of peace be there, your peace shall rest upon it ; if not, it shall turn to you again. And in the same house remain, eating and drink- ing such things as they give ; for the laborer is worthy of his hire. Go not from house to house." — St. Luke x. 3, 8. Now, sirs, these Old Baptists positively claim that these wages that Paul received were alms, or wages re- ceived from the hands of his more fortunate brethren for manual labor, and that the wages were given to or re- ceived by Paul to be bestowed upon the poor and afflicted of less fortunate churches ; and that Paul did not appro- priate it for self-aggrandizement, as do my missionaries of the present day. Paul further asserts that his brethren from Macedonia, who had been more fortunate in this world's goods, were willing and did help him in ministering to the wants of these poor, distressed and afflicted brethren, by furnish- 136 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. ing him means to live upon while with the poor, that he might not be burdensome to them. For he declared that he had not been burdensome to them, nor would he be. They further contend that it cannot be proven by the New Testament Scriptures that Paul or any of the apostles ever preached for money as a business of gain in temporal things, but that they preached from a higher incentive, prompted by the spirit and power of God, as do the Old Baptists to-day. In the last quotation where it says, "The laborer is worthy of his hue," they contend that the connections fully explain the meaning, and that it does not mean what my missionaries would have it mean, when they are begging their laity and friends to pay them their hire : but that the apostles were sent into cities and coun- tries among strangers and enemies to the Christian re- ligion, and are represented as lambs among wolves, and are commanded to carry nothing of carnal things with them ; and if the son of peace {Spirit of Christ) be in the first house they enter, a sign was to be given to them, and they were to remain there ; otherwise they were to find a house whose inmates were the people of God. And they were commanded to "go not from house to house," nor to become burdensome, but to make this house their home, that they might earn what they con- sumed, and that their consumption was reckoned as wages, and therefore " the laborer is worthy of his hire," and that the apostles did not preach for money, as do my missionaries. SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 137 They further teach that there would be too much in- compatibility in the Scriptures for the apostles to de- nounce the spirit of Antichrist in one sentence for preach- ing for filthy lucre, and recommend it in another. Hear the denunciations of Paul upon the theories of my mis- sionaries : "For what is it wherein ye were inferior to other churches, except it be that I myself was not burdensome to you? Forgive me this wrong. Behold, the third time I am ready to come to you ; and I will not be bur- densome to you ; for I seek not yours, but you : for the children ought not to lay up for the parents, but the parents for the children. And I will very gladly spend and be spent for you ; though the more abundantly I love you, the less I be loved. But be it so, I did not bur- den you ; nevertheless, being crafty, I caught you with guile. Did I make a gain of you by any of them whom I sent unto you?"— II Cor. xii. 13, 18. My missionaries do not teach this way, neither have I impressed them with such a theory ; and with few ex- ceptions they are compelled to be paid for their time and services in the ministry, for they cannot live without means, and I have impressed most of them with the idea that it is not reputable to have hard hands and common apparel. Again, Paul says to his brother preachers (apostles), "For I think that God hath set forth us the apostles last, as it were appointed to death ; for we are made a spec- tacle unto the world, and to angels, and to men. 138 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. "We are fools for Christ's sake, but ye are wise in Christ ; we are weak, but ye are strong ; ye are honor- able, but we are despised. Even unto this present hour we both hunger and thirst, and are naked, and are buf- feted, and have no certain dwelling place ; and labor, working with our own hands ; being reviled, we bless ; being persecuted, we suffer it ; being defamed, we en- treat. We are made as the filth of the world, and are the off scouring of all things unto this day." — I Cor. iv. 9, 14. The above quotation will not suit the pattern of my missionaries, but very aptly applies to these Old Bap- tists, and I am not surprised at my honorable mission- aries in shunning the society of such a low and degraded set. And my advice to you, my friends, is to hold up your heads, and court the favor and approbation of the royal families of the land, and submit to no such lowli- ness as set forth by old Paul and these Old Baptists ; and with the approval of the elite and fashionable public, you are sure to succeed. Only listen how these Old Baptists revile the plans of my missionaries in paying my ministers for preaching the gospel and carrying it to others who would die and go down to endless perdition were it not for being sup- plied with the gospel through the medium of my hired servants. They contend that all true ministers are carried by the gospel, and that when the minister is imbued with the Holy Spirit, there is a propelling power in the spirit SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 139 of the gospel that compels the minister to go and pro- claim the gospel to a dying world ; and that this spirit is so irresistible that it is like "fire in their bones," and that this impression haunts them by day and by night, and says unto them, " Woe unto me if I preach not the gospel." And that the ministers of Antichrist are hired to go and preach and carry the gospel, and are therefore peddling out or making merchandise of the gospel as a matter of gain, rather than labor with their own hands as did Paul and the other apostles. They further teach that the relationship of the church and minister is like unto master and servant. And that God requires that masters should give (not pay) to their servants that which is just and right, and that servants should obey their masters, not answering again, (or dic- tating,) and that for a servant to refuse to obey or do his duty, unless his master would obligate to pay him a stipulated salary, would be rebellion in the first degree, and would righteously merit chastisement. Or for the servant to dictate to his master how and what to do, would be presumption of a grave magnitude, and would justly deserve a sharp rebuke. And on the other hand, should the master receive the time, labor and benefits of the obedient servant, and then require that servant to feed and clothe himself, he would prove himself to be a cruel and unjust master, and would be in open rebellion against the laws of nature and of high heaven. " Art thou called being a servant? Care not for it, but if thou mayest be made free, use it rather, for he 140 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. that is called in the Lord, being a servant, is the Lord's freeman ; likewise also he that is called, being free, is Christ's servant. Ye are bought with a price, be not ye the servants of men." — I Cor. vii. 21, 24. They further claim that the ministry is a gift from God to the church, as a servant for the benefit and edification of the church, and that the authority of the minister to serve and administer to the church is a gift from God freely bestowed, which gift the minister dare not price nor sell. And that the man who professes a call from God to the ministry, to preach and serve the church, and then sets a price on his services, or proposes to peddle out the gos- pel to the highest bidder, it proves one of two things beyond a doubt. He is either a wolf in sheep's clothing, and after the fleece and not the flock ; or he is in open rebellion against the order of high heaven, and, Balaam like, has sold himself out for the wages of unrighteous- ness. They further say that the law from the great King of Zion is, " And as ye go, preach, saying, The kingdom of heaven is at hand. Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out devils ; freely ye have received, freely give. Provide neither gold nor silver, nor brass, in your purses, nor scrip for your journey, neither two coats, neither shoes, nor yet staves ; for the workman is worthy of his meat." — Mat. x. 7, 11. Which law all faithful servants wish to obey ; and that while the faith- ful servant freely bestows his gift, and serves in love, it is nothing but just and right, for those who are the SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 141 happy recipients of this free gift that they should see that the servant does not suffer, but that he is cared for in a proper way. " If we have sown unto you spiritual things, is it a great thing if we should reap your carnal things ? " — I Cor. ix. 11. "Even so hath the Lord ordained that they which preach the gospel should live of the gospel/' — I Cor. ix. 14. " For it is written in the law of Moses, Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the ox that treadeth out the corn. Doth God take care for oxen ? " — I Cor. ix. 9. "For it hath pleased them of Macedonia and Achaia to make a certain contribution for the poor saints which are at Jerusalem. It has pleased them verily ; and their debtors they are, for if the Gentiles have been made partakers of their spiritual things, their duty is also to minister unto them in carnal things." — Eom. xv. 26, 27. Now, my friends, these Old Baptists are not so much to blame after all, for they verily believe that these quotations are the words of inspiration. And if it were so, they would be strictly correct when they say that it cannot be proven by Bible testimony that either of the old apostles ever preached for a stipulated salary, or ped- dled the gospel out for money, as do my missionaries. But it seems from the reading of the above so-called Scriptures that these contributions are reckoned as alms to the poor downtrodden minister of God, who is reck- oned as the ox, and is as dependent upon the laity and friends for sustenance as is the ox upon his master's 143 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. crib, whose mouth is not to be muzzled. And the tread- ing out the corn is reckon :d as the preaching of the gos- pel, which is not to be hindered by withholding of car- nal things from the servants of the church, or ministers of the gospel : which carnal things are not reckoned as a debt for services rendered, but as a Christian duty. And that the same unerring Spirit that stimulates the minister of God to go and preach the unsearchable riches of Christ, and to preach it without money and without price to the poor and afflicted -aims of God, will also stimulate the recipients of this heavenly message to minister to the poor oxen ers) of thier carnal things, in proportion as the Lord has prospered them. They further teach that the church conferences of my missionaries are legislative bodies, instead of being- ecclesiastical bodies, and that my missionaries enact laws that are not known in the Bible, which laws are for the purpose of establishing new institutions and inventions that will compel the laity to pay their preachers, from the fact that the members who are converted and bap- tized into the church by my ministers are destitute of this propelling Spirit that stimulates the true minister to go and preach, in h istained, and that stim- ulates all true >aints to give alms to the support of their pastor, servant or preacher. And that the converts of my missionaries are compelled to have a law to make them pay their preachers, and that some of the more wealthy members pay largely in their public meeting-. in order to make a display of their liberality and render SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 143 themselves conspicuous and popular in the community, so that their merchandise and other pursuits may yield them larger profits. And that there are a few of the true and chosen people of God in their legislative churches who have been deceived and captured by the craftiness of these legislative churches, who pay our preachers from motives inspired by the spirit of truth, who think that they are doing God's service. My friends, these are grave accusations against the doings of my missionaries, and all intelligent people know that it is nothing more than a mental hallucina- tion of old Paul and these Old Baptists, and my advice to you is to pay as little attention to it as you possibly can ; for all sensible people know that these so-called Scriptures that seem to justify their theory of the plan of salvation are not the words of inspiration, but are the words of an insane Paul, and are the tenets of a bigoted old fogy denomination, and ought never to have been re- corded in the New Testament Scriptures ; and nothing but time and our New Translations will ever eradicate these pestiferous dogmas from the memory of these Old Baptists. Bed & Co. — With much anxiety and expectation we have listened to thee, Lord, and have been both edified and disappointed. We have been edified in the great expositions that you have made of the fabrications of those old writers, beside being much interested in your advice to us as to the proper course to pursue in our de- portment toward these Old Baptists, who are such a ter- 14A SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. ror to our plans of spreading the gospel. But we have been lost in disappointment and our hopes have not been gratified as we had expected with a suitable remedy for the extermination of their pernicious dogmas. What a blessing it would have been in all generations had those so-called Scriptures, which prove their tenets to be true, never gone into type ; for we have made many efforts to explain their theory away. And when we apply Eng- lish literature to the chapters and verses that they rally around for succor, we utterly fail to make it mean any- thing but what they say it does, although we know it to be mere fiction and a misinterpretation of your meaning at the time it was written. But it will take years to beat it into the heads of these Old Baptists, for we have brought our ablest talents and literary men accompanied with common sense, against them, but aU to no purpose, and we think it will ever stand thus with them while the Scriptures read as they do at present. And to tell you the truth, sir, their aspirations in religious matters never run above what they are pleased to call the old paths, and they emphatically say that Christianity is not a pro- gressive science, and they are content to grope along in the old way, as though this was not an age of improve- ment. By the authority of Paul and others of the old writ- ers, these Old Baptists have merged into a theory of re- demption that bids defiance to the most learned of our theologians, and is in direct opposition to all our mission- ary schemes. SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 145 They say that all for whom Jesus Christ covenanted with the Father to save were merged into sin by their federal head, Adam, and were alike sinners with the children of perdition, and are by nature the children of wrath, even as others, (Eph. ii. 3,) and that the law knew no mercy, but demanded stern justice, which justice inflicted the punishment of death and banishment from the peaceful presence of God, and makes no allow- ance for the ignorance of its tenets, and therefore cor- poreal and spiritual death are inevitable results in the satisfaction of a divine law, and that all who fell under this law of justice would be banished from the peaceful presence of a just God, upon the hypothesis of God sav- ing the people upon the theory of justice being meted out according to our just deserts. " For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God." — Rom. hi. 23. "The thoughts of foolishness is sin, and the scorner is an abomination to men."— Prov. xxiv. 9. "Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in His sight : for by the law is the knowledge of sin."— Eom. hi. 20. "Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression. "—Rom. iv. 15. " For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth. "—Rom. x. 4. " Who also hath made us able ministers of the New Testament ; not of the letter, but of the spirit : for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life."— II Cor. hi. 6. And that the souls for whom Christ died especially, (not in a common, or time salvation) were bought with the blood of Jesus, they 146 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. being ten thousand talents indebted, and not a farthing to pay with, (see parable Mat. xviii. 23) sold under sin by their federal head, Adam, who left them no inheritance but the law of works to pay with ; which works, accord- ing to the writings of Paul, and others of the inspired writers, were not a legal tender for the debt of sin, and condemnation justly followed the law of works. It therefore required the blood of Jesus to redeem these favored ones from the condemnation of this holy law, as per agreement between the Father and the Son before the world began. ' ' For by one offering he hath per- fected for ever them that are sanctified.'' — Heb. x. 14. And that this blood covenant is typified in the old Testament Scriptures by the blood of the lamb on the lintles of the doors of the people of God, in time of the passover, (see Ex. xii.) and that all the saints of God were chosen in Christ by covenant between the Father and Son, and in time is developed, and is made manifest in their daily walk as Christians, and that this blood will be evidenced by then pious lives and godly conversations, and that they will be passed over by the destroying angel on the day of final retribution, because of the evi- dences of the blood of Jesus on the lintles of their hearts. They say that these favored ones, prior to regeneration, are completely bankrupt, and are wholly unable to com- mence paying the price of redemption, and illustrate their theory by supposing that A owes B ten thousand dollars in American gold, and that A is an invalid and a SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 147 bankrupt, and cannot even commence the payment, and that justice demands that A pay the debt promptly at maturity, without any equivocation, mental reservation or secret evasion ; and that B prosecutes his claim to the last extremity of the law, which law knows no mercy, and would punish A with death, or imprisonment in the dark confines of outer darkness throughout eternity. In this dreadful extremity C steps in as a mediator between A and B, and says to B, who represents the law, Sir, I have a blood relationship to this man A ; he is bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh ; and he cannot die nor go into prison. I have the American gold, and I will buy him out of this dilemma, and set him free, and the debt shall be remembered against him no more forever. In this figure they say that A represents a poor con- victed sinner who has been quickened into spiritual life by the quickening influence of the Holy Spirit upon his heart, softening his stony heart, unstopping his deaf ears, and opening his spiritual eyes, so that he sees, hears and knows his wretched condition by nature, and that he has violated the laws of God, which laws know no mercy, but demand justice, which justice would send him to endless perdition, knowing that " The heart is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked : who can know it ? " — Jer. xvii. 9. And that when all human efforts have failed, which efforts are always resorted to for refuge, until the poor hell deserving sinner, as he sees himself to be, has worked himself into complete bankruptcy, upon the Arminian plan of redemption, hoping to bring God 148 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. under obligation to save him upon a principle of good works, he then despairs of salvation by the deeds of the law, or good works, which law condemns and does not justify. And is represented by B in the figure, who de- mands full payment, death or imprisonment. At this auspicious moment, on the part of B, who represents the law, C steps in and represents Christ in the satisfaction cf the law, and reveals himself to the poor lost sinner in the pardon of his great debt of sin, that the deeds of the law of works could not satisfy, and reveals himself to him, "the chief est among ten thousand, and altogether lovely," being his kinsman in flesh and spirit. "Even so we, when we were children, were in bondage under the elements of the world ; but when the fullness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, to redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons. And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the spirit of His Son into your hearts, crying Aboa, Father. Where- fore thou art no more a servant, but a son ; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ. "—Gal. iv. 3, 8. " That we henceforth be no more children tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they he in wait to deceive ; but speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ." — Eph. iv. 14, 15. "For no man ever yet hated his own flesh, but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church ; for we are members of his SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 149 body, of his flesh, and of his bones. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh." — Eph. v. 29, 31. " But this man, because he continueth ever, hath an unchangeable priesthood. Wherefore he is able to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing He ever liveth to make intercession for them." — Heb. vii. 24, 25. Now, sir, these Old Baptists can with apparent ease use these illustrations and bring up Bible testimony in sup- port of their theory that actually mocks our theory of redemption, and positively puts our legal institutions of salvation by grace (on conditions that we accept the terms of salvation) to flight, as though God was going to reject us if we obey the law of good works, and accept salva- tion as the result of obedience to the law of God. They positively claim, from Bible authority, that our deeds of good works prior to regeneration condemn us. "Know- ing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law ; for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified." — Gal. ii. 16. And with such Scriptures as these, combating against our* theory, we actually become discouraged, and know not what to do, while the present translation of the Bible is recognized. And we call upon you with much fervency of prayer to hasten the time when the miserable heresies will be wiped from the face of the earth, and establish a 150 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. Bible that will approbate and save men in accordance with their deeds of merit, in working for the cause of the Master ; for we know that it is impossible for the God that we serve to save people who sit upon the stool of do- nothing, and reject others who are all the time engaged in some good work for the promotion of the cause of God in the salvation of sinners. The doctrine of those old writers and these Old Baptists are in direct refutation of the passages of Scripture upon which we base our theory, and they claim that with our construction of the mean- ing or definition of these Scriptures there would be an incompatibility in the Scriptures of divine truth that dare not exist in the Bible ; and that all that is written in the Old and New Testament Scriptures is in perfect har- mony, when properly understood, and that the Script- ures that seem to sustain our theory are inferential and nothing more than warnings to the child of God ; and that these inferential Scriptures must yield to positive declarations, and that the "wills" and "shalls" must have the precedence. " Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin ; for his seed remaineth in him : and he cannot sin, because he is born of God. In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil : whoso- ever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother. "—I John hi. 9, 10. " Peter, an aspostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Beth- ynia ; elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the spirit, unto obedi- SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 151 ence and sprinkling of the blood of Jesns Christ : Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied. Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to His abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you, who are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation ready to be revealed in the last time. "—I Pet. i. 6. " For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts ; and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people ; and they shall not teach every man his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, know the Lord ; for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest." — Heb. viii. 10, 11. " But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all. For it is written, rejoice, thou barren that bearest not ; break forth and cry, thou that travail - est not ; for the desolate hath many more children than she which hath a husband. Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise. But as then he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the spirit, even so it is now. Nevertheless what saith the Scripture ? Cast out the bondwoman and her son ; for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the free woman. So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free." — Gal. 152 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. iv. 26, 31. "And when the Gentiles heard this, they were glad, and glorified the word of the Lord ; and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed." — Acts, xiii. 48. Now, sir, these Scriptures are positive declarations, and are perfectly incompatible with the Scriptures that seem to sustain our theory of free agency and apostasy. But these Old Baptists can reconcile them with apparent ease with their system of compatibility and harmony of the Scriptures. And the more fully to convince you of the ingenuity of the old fogies in baffling the skill and arguments of the most lordly of our experts in theology, we will quote to you some of our favorite texts of Scrip- ture, and give you their arguments, and show you the ease with which they harmonize them with their dogma of special election : ' ' 0, Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not." — Mat. xxiii. 37. "The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness ; but is long suffering to usward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to re- pentance." — II Pet. hi. 9. "And it repented the Lord that He had made man on the earth, and it grieved Him at His heart." — G-en. vi. G. "And Samuel came no more to see Saul until the day of his death ; nevertheless Samuel mourned for Saul. And the Lord repented that he had made Saul king over SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. loo Israel."— I Saml. xv. 35. 4k And God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way ; and God repented of the evil that He had said that He would do unto them ; and He did it not." — Jonah ii. 10. Now, sir, these Old Baptists contend that Jesus Christ was verily God and verily man, and that he possessed all the divine attributes of God, and all the sympathetic attributes of man, and was like unto man in every par- ticular except sin ; and that the Father carried his humanity all through the days of old, and that there has never been a time with the Father that the humanity of Jesus was not with him, and that this humanity or sym- pathetic nature of Jesus did all of this "grieving," "re- penting," "sorrowing," "rejoicing," and "changing," that we have been accusing the Father of doing. Otherwise, they say, the Father would be changeable, and would not be as represented in the following Scripture : " Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning." — James i. 17. They further contend that the humanity of this same Jesus dwelt in the very bosom of heaven until his advent into this world, and that after doing his Father's will on earth he returned to his primitive glory with the Father in heaven ; and that before, during and since his advent, he had a perfect right, being clothed with this humanity, to make laws regulating the passions of his fellow human beings, and to revoke them at his will ; and as this body of Jesus was an incorruptible body, 154 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. that it could not glory in the punishment of human beings. He therefore grieved, repented, sorrowed and rejoiced, with their miseries and joys, and revoked the chastising sentences of the law at his pleasure, and re- joiced when suffering humanity was relieved. This same Jesus was prophesied by the prophets of old, and it is said, " He is despised and rejected of men ; a man of sorrow and acquainted with grief."' — Is. lhi. 3. And that the human sympathy of this same Jesus would have gathered the children at Jerusalem, as a hen gath- ereth her chickens, and would have encircled the whole Adamic family with an everlasting salvation, had he been allowed by the Father to execute this human will, just as you and I would do. But he emphatically de- clares that * • All that the Father giveth me shall come to me ; and hhn that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out. For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of Him that sent me. And this is the Father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day. And this is the will of Hhn that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life ; and I will raise him up at the last day.*'— St. John vi. 37, 40. ''Saying, Father, if thou be wilhng, remove this cup from me : nevertheless, not my will, but thine be done." — Luke xxii. 42. Hence they say it is evident from these quotations that he had a human will, as well as a divine will, and SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 155 that while the divine will of the Father was dealing with the souls and spirits of men, his human will was dealing with the fleshly passions of men, and had forever been a high priest over the human passions of men, as far as he was permitted by the will of the Father ; he therefore had a perfect right to make laws, and revoke them at his will, when it did not conflict with the will of the Father. " Thy people shall be willing in the day of thy power, in the beauties of holiness, from the womb of the morning : thou hast the dew of thy youth. The Lord hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek." — Ps. ex. 3, 4. " For this Melchisedek, king of Salem, priest of the most high God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings, and blessed him." — Heb. vii. 1. "Without father, without mother, without descent; having neither beginning of days nor end of life ; but made like unto the Son of God, abideth a priest contin- ually."— Heb. vii. 3. Now, sir, they say that this high priest was a type of this same Jesus before he was manifest in the flesh, and that he came down from heaven, not to do this priestly human will, but the will of the Father. And from the fact of a former contract with the Father, he was under obligation to come down from heaven, and suffer and die specially for every one that the, Father gave him. And the Father was under equal obligation to the Son to give him every one that was agreed upon. Therefore as a man he made laws, and revoked them, and as a God 156 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. he did the will of the Father, whose decrees are irrevoc- able, or he would not be unchangeable. And in confirm- ation of the whole matter, they have only to refer us to the supplications of Jesus in his prayer to the Father, to shut our mouths and deride our arguments. "I have glorified thee on the earth : I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do. And now, Father, glorify thou me with thine own self, with the glory which I had with thee before the world was." — St. John vii. 4, 5. They further say that if Jesus had asked for additional glory, it would have been presumption of a grave mag- nitude, and that he would have been asking the Father for more than was given to him in the covenant of re- demption ; and that by heirship none others were eu ti- tled to the inheritance, except the heirs of promise that had been given to the Son by the Father before the world began ; and that the Son was perfectly happy before the world began, being in full possession of all that the Father had given him in body and spirit, he being com- posed of the body of all the saints from the commence- ment to the end of time ; and their body and spirit being his body and spirit, he was perfectly happy with this eternal union of body and spirit. And that by agreement he and the Father created man as the natural progenitor of the entire human family, and that all along through time " as many as were ordained to eternal life believed, " (Acts xviii. 48) by the Father inspiring them with that belief, by sending forth the spirit of His Son SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 157 into their hearts, and quickening them into spiritual life. " And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the spirit of His Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father." — Gal. iv. 6. And that the Father draws them to Jesus by his love. ' ' The Lord appeared of old unto me, saying, yea, I have loved thee with an everlasting love ; therefore with loving kindness have I drawn thee. " — Jer. xxxi. 3. And that they being his kinsmen in flesh and spirit ; and that when this revelation is made to them in their conviction, conversion and regeneration, it is impossible for them to resist this love that is mani- fest in them, in their transition from nature to grace. And that this heavenly family having been made mani- fest in the flesh through the medium of their natural progenitor, Adam, and being deluged by him into sin. " For if by one man's offence death reigned by one, much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ." — Eom. v. 17. "For as by one man's dis- obedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous." — Rom. v. 19. And that the heirs of promise were by nature like the heirs of perdition, "and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others." Therefore by special contract there must be an offering for sin in the person of Jesus, who knew no sin, he having lived in perfect obedience to the law. He having satisfied the demands of the law with his righteousness, the sins of the people, whom the Father gave him, were imputed to Jesus, and they are, 15S SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. or rather were, saved by an imputed righteousness, and not by any righeousness of their own ; for the law re- quires perfect obedience. " For all have sinned and come short of the glory of God." — Eom. hi. 23. And that from the fact of this eternal union of Christ and his people, Jesus left the climes of glory by contract with the Father, and made his advent into the world, and took upon himself a body of flesh and blood. " For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh, that the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." — Eom. viii. 3, 4. They further contend that this heavenly family were in Jesus Christ from all eternity, and that his righteousness was imputed to them from all eternity in the mind of the Father, and that in time this imputed righteousness of Jesus is manifested to them, in their conviction, conversion and regeneration, being born of that incorruptible seed, or Spirit of God. Jesus therefore prays the Father for the same glory that he had with Him before the world was, and does not ask for any ad- ditional glories, but would be perfectly satisfied with the same glory, without any diminution or addition of the souls of men. Had Jesus conferred with the human sympathies of flesh and blood, of which he had taken a part, he would have saved the whole human family with an everlast- ing salvation ; but he came down from heaven not to do SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 159 this, but to do the will of the Father ; and the Father's will is, "That of all that He has given me I should lose nothing."— St. John vi. 29. Now, sir, if this doctrine be true, and all this heavenly family that were elected and chosen in Christ before the world began, and who are so sure to merge back into Christ at the final consummation of all things, upon the hypotheses of election and final perseverance, we must acknowledge our utter inability to see the necessity of preaching the gospel, and hence the fallacy of Jesus com- manding his disciples, "Gk> ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved ; but he that believeth not shall be damned." — St. Mark xvi. 15, 16. And we much desire that you edify us on this particular subject. Arminian's GrOD. — My friends, before I attempt a so- lution of these questions, permit me to inquire, are these things true ? Of course, with the present translation of the Bible, these Old Baptists are well fortified, and with their construction of its teachings they are able to re- pulse our ablest divines. I can only tell you what these Old Baptists teach, and give you their feigned reasons for thus teaching, and then admonish you as to the great plan of saving souls through the medium of my mission- aries, whom I command and commission to go and carry the gospel to those who are destitute of its glorious and life giving principles, and who are dying and going to endless perdition for want of more evangelical ministers, who carry the very essence of the gospel in their hearts, 160 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. and lisp its soothing fragrance upon the lintles of the hearts of all that will receive it upon the hypothesis of our broad platform of free agency. Only hear their quotations and interpretations : "For the preaching of the cross is to them that perish foolishness ; but unto us which are saved it is the power of God. For it is writ- ten, and I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent. "—I Cor. i. 18, 19. "For after that, in the wisdom of God, it pleased God by the f oolishness of preaching to save them that believe. For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom." — I Cor. i. 21, 22. Now, sirs, these Old Baptists claim that this spiritual understanding is only communicated to those who are al- ready saved, and that they stood saved in the eternal mind of God, and that they do not have to be saved, but that they are saved already, and that in time this spirit- ual wisdom is revealed to them, and that the preaching of the gospel saves them from seductions and error in this world, and that by obeying the mandates of the Mas- ter, by following him into the liquid grave, and being buried in the ordinance of baptism, and by being encir- cled in the pales of the church as established by Jesus Christ and his apostles. But that this salvation has nothing to do with the eternal destiny of the chosen peo- ple of God, but is the answer of a good conscience toward God, in that of obeying His precepts and examples. And that this kind of tuition was to the Jews a stumbling block, and unto the Greeks, foolishness, (I Cor. i. 23) and SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 101 that my missionaries are to-day as were the national Jews and Greeks, and are therefore spiritually blind. "The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us, (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ." — I Pet. hi. 21. And that the preaching of the gospel is for the purpose of edifying and saving the chosen people of God in this mode of ex- istence, and has nothing to do with their final destiny, and that all spiritual communications are made to a quickened and spiritual people, by the omnipotent power of God, independent of all the effort systems that have ever been instituted by man. " But the natural man re- ceiveth not the things of the Spirit of God ; for they are foolishness unto him : neither can he know them, be- cause they are spiritually discerned." — I Cor. ii. 14. They further contend that it would have been unwise in the Master to have sent His apostles to preach to a people that had no spiritual discernment, and who were dead to spiritual things ; and that it was not the office of the preacher to preach spiritual lif e into them, as there is no spiritual life in preaching ; but that the subjects of God's amazing mercy must be made alive by the quick- ening influence of the Spirit of God before they can hear with that spiritual precision that is peculiar to God's chosen and regenerated people. For the natural dead cannot hear natural things, neither can they impart natural life ; therefore the spiritual dead cannot hear spiritual things, nor can they impart spiritual life nor 162 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. hear spiritual things until spiritual lif e is communicated to them ; and that the preaching of the gospel will not put spiritual life into them, but that when life is com- municated to them by the opera^jon of the Holy Spirit upon their hearts, they are then able to see, hear and understand spiritual things, and are then ready to re- ceive and feast upon the preached word of Jesus Christ and his inspired writers. They further teach that all the epistles in the New Testament Scriptures are addres- sed to the church of God, and to no one else, and that Jesus Christ and his apostles would have been stupid to have addressed it to those who were carnally minded. " For to be carnally minded is death ; but to be spirit- ually minded is life and peace. Because the carnal mind is enmity against God ; for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be/' — Kom. viii. 6, 7. And that God has never set up but one church ; and there is but one Lord, one faith and one baptism ; and that my missionaries have many lords, many faiths, and many baptisms ; and that none but the regenerated people of God can understand the spiritual dealings of God upon his chosen vessels of mercy. And that my missionaries have no right to claim any of the spiritual dealings of God upon His people as taught in the Scriptures, but should hold strictly to the theory of salvation by works, as the Scriptures will not allow "grace" and "works" to be mixed in our eternal salvation. " And if by grace, then is it no more of works ; otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then is it no more grace ; SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 163 otherwise work is no more work." — Kom. xi. 6. But that when my missionaries are made willing by the mighty influence of God's Holy Spirit to give up all the institutions of the world for Christ's sake and follow Christ in baptism, and be buried with Christ in baptism by a legal administrator, and then follow the pattern laid down by Christ and his apostles, in all the ordin- ances of his established church, without taking anything therefrom, or adding anything thereto, leaving all the world and its concomitant vehicles of salvation, to be held to and participated in by those of the world who love the world and its institutions better than they love the church of Christ, then my missionaries will be enti- tled to the privileges of the church of Christ, and can claim the Scriptures as their spiritual counselor, as well as their moral, historical and literary guide. For many years I have impressed the various orders of my missionaries to slander the Old Baptists, in order to carry our theory into its fullest effects ; and I still think it best to misrepresent them. From the fact that the Old Baptists teach that the Scriptures are only writ- ten to the church, and that none but regenerated sinners can understand the Scriptures in their spiritual bearings, I have had my missionaries to positively assert from their pulpits, to their various auditories, that the Old Baptists positively refuse to preach to any except the re- generated people of God, or what they are pleased to call the church, on the pretext that the others could not see, hear nor understand with that spiritual wisdom that is 164: SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. peculiar to the people of God. But the Old Baptists through all ages have positively declared this accusatiou to be false, and that they are commanded to sow the seed of the gospel broadcast, for they know not who the people of God are, and could not presume to single them out in a congregation ; but that God knows them, and at His own appointed time His Spirit will accompany the preached word, and that it will carry conviction to the dead sinner's heart ; and that this divine inspiration is like unto a light shining in a dark £>lace, illuminating the dark understanding of the then poor, sin-polluted sinner as he then sees himself to be, the reality of which he had been completely dead to up to this time. But he now cries out in the anguish of his soul, "Lord, be mer- ciful to me, a poor, sin-polluted sinner. " And that his very soul from thence until his deliverance is filled with supplication to the throne of mercy for deliverance, until the appointed time of the Father. And that when de- liverance comes, supplications are turned into praises and thanksgivings to God for thus delivering such a poor, hell-deserving sinner as he sees himself to have been ; and that the poor, delivered child of God's mercy is ready to exclaim, that if justice had been meted out to him instead of mercy, his portion would have been reck- oned among the damned. But he rejoices to know that while the epistles were written to the church, provisions have been made through the preached word that "He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches." — Rev. iii. 13, 22, compared with Rev. SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 165 xxii. 16. "I, Jesus, have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches." And these Old Baptists say that preachers are not angels, but that angels are messengers direct from heaven, conveying these glad tidings to the hearts of the people composing the churches, and that Christ's body is not divided, and that these churches are separate organizations for the sake of convenience, but are all the same body in Christ Jesus, and that they preach the same doctrine, and have the same Lord, the same faith, and the same baptism. " For no man ever yet hated his own flesh, but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church. For we are members of His body, of His flesh, and of His bones. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh. This is a great mystery, but I speak concern- ing Christ and the church. "— Eph. v. 29, 33. Therefore these Old Baptists say that a man must be made willing by the Spirit and power of God to leave all his pet soul saving machineries as instituted by my missionaries, and become willing to take Jesus Christ and his plan of salvation for surety, without any of the common auxili- aries that have ever been instituted by man, and if he cannot do this, that it shows a manifest want of faith, and that he is yet clinging to the traditions of his father and mother, and not willing to risk Christ ; and that an inspired apostle declares most positively, "They are of the world, and the world heareth them ; " (but that) "we are of God ; he that knoweth God heareth us. Hereby 166 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. know we the spirit of truth and the spirit of error. " — I John iv. 5, 6. And that when my missionaries preach the world hears them, because the unconverted have no difficulty in hearing a man-pleasing preacher, because their preaching is from natural reasoning ; therefore the natural man receives it and feasts upon it, because it feeds his natural and carnal propensities for self-aggran- dizement. But to the spiritual minded Jesus has said, " Blessed are your ears, for they hear," etc., and until this blessing is given to us, we are but natural and have no ability to hear or receive the things of the Spirit. These Old Baptists further teach that Jesus has said un- to the Father, " Father, the hour is come," etc. " I have manifested thy name to the men which thou gavest me out of the world : thine they were, and thou gavest them me : and they have kept thy word. Now they have known that all things whatsoever thou hast given me are of thee. For I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me ; and they have received them, and have known surely that I come out from thee ; and they have believed that thou didst send me. I pray for them; I pray not for the world, but for them which thou hast given me ; for they are thine. And all mine are thine, and thine are mine ; and I am glorified in them." " I have given them thy word, and the world hath hated them, because they are not of the world, even as I am not of the world." — St. John xvii. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 14. They actually challenge my missionaries to show SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 167 another denomination except the Old Baptists that preach this doctrine as set forth in these texts of Scrip- ture. They therefore claim that they are the only or- ganized church of Jesus Christ under the canopy of heaven, and verify their assertions by undeniable proofs, and say that of ail people on earth, they are hated worse (for contending for this doctrine, by those composing what they are pleased to call the Antichristian churches) than all other denominations combined, as did the world hate the disciples and doctrines of Jesus Christ. They say that those who accuse the Old Baptists of not preaching to sinners, but to the church only, are willfully misrepresenting the Old Baptists, provided they have ever observed the tenets of the Old Baptists ; for they have ever preached to sinners, whenever a door has been opened unto them, to whoever may be present, whether the sinner hear or not ; and that the reason why the enemies to the doctrine of the Old Baptists accuse them is because they dare not give the children's bread to any but children, and withhold it from dogs, (Mark vii. 27.) And that what my missionaries mean by preach- ing to sinners is to tell them to repent and believe the gospel, and that they can repent and believe the gospel if they will, upon their own volition or will ; and if they do not, that they will be damned. The Old Baptists say that Jesus and his apostles did not so teach, and that there is not a word of gospel in such preaching, and that such preaching is strictly false, and that repentance is as much the gift of God as is the remission or forgiveness 168 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. of sin. "In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves, if God peradventure will give them repent- ance to the acknowledging of the truth." — II Tim. ii. 25. " Him hath God exalted with his right hand to be a Prince and a Savior, for to give repentance to Israel and forgiveness of sins." — Acts v. 31. Eld. Beebe says, " Before I attempt to give you my understanding of those passages to which you have call- ed my attention, I wish to premise first, that all revela- tion by the unerring Spirit of God to the saints is made to their faith, not to their reason. We are called to walk by faith, not by sight ; and to look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen ; for the things which are seen are temporal, but the things which are not seen are eternal. And, ' Faith is the sub- stance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.' — See II Cor. v. 7 ; iv 18 ; Heb. xi. i. What there- fore God reveals to our faith is not to be doubted because of the blindness of our mental powers to comprehend it. The faith of Abraham impelled him to move forward, not knowing whither he went. The carnal mind (even of the Christian) receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God ; for they are foolishness to the natural man (or mind) ; neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. You cannot discipline or educate Note. — We hope to be pardoned for using a few extracts that are in point, from the facile and illustrious pen of the late Eld. Gilbert Beebe, of N. Y., (in writing to a dear sister,) whose pen and inspired mind we could not presume to equal, and whose demise we deplore. SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 169 your reasoning powers so as to comprehend the things of the Spirit ; for if that could be done, the conflict between the flesh and the Spirit would cease. You seem to think that if the Lord would give you light on the one point, everything else would be clear; but it is like the poetic idea of ascending the Alps ; as we gain what had appeared to be the summit, still we find Alps on Alps appearing. And finally we with the apostle will, after all that we can know is known, have to ex- claim, ' the depths ! ' The one perplexing point, if I rightly understand you, is that on which we have con- versed, namely, is the gospel to be preached to the un- godly ? And is the preaching of it to them a means by which they are to be quickened or born again? To these questions I can only repeat my former replies. The ' gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world, for a witness unto all nations ; and then shall the end come.' — Mat. xxiv. 14. ' Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.' — Mark xvi. 15. Both the commission and the example of Christ and his apostles show that the proclamation of the gospel is to be made unrestrictedly to all, which justifies Christ's min- isters in preaching wherever a door is opened, without first excluding from the assembly all who are not born again. And this preaching to a mixed multitude is not to quicken them, but is for a witness : and what does it witness ? It witnesses or discriminates between those who are and those who are not born again ; for he that hath an ear to hear will hear ; and as on the day of pen- 170 SUPPOSED ESTER VIEW. tecost, they will gladly receive the woiv ; while all who are dead in sins will fail to receive it. It is a savor of life unto life to them that are born of God, and of death unto death to them that perish. Jesus has said. ' As the Father raiseth up the dead and quickeneth them, even so the Son also quickeneth whom he will.' Is there any other way or means by which the dead can be quickened \ i Verily, verily, I say unto you, he that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath (not shall or may have) everlasting life.' — John v. 21, 24. The hearing of the gospel, and the reception of it as a wit- ness, proves that the hearer and recipient of it has already passed from death unto life. Xone but God himself can make the dead hear, as He made Lazarus hear ; and this He will do, for He says, ' The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God, and they that hear shall live. 3 — John v. 25. Can any other voice penetrate the dark domains of death, and quicken the dead ? The gospel is glad tidings to the meek. — Is. lxi. 1 ; Luke iv. 18. Is the preaching of Christ's gospel or glad tidings to any others ? Tor unto us was the gospel preached, as well as unto them; but the word preached did not profit them, not being mixed with faith in them that heard. '— Heb. iv. 2. Faith is the fruit of the Spirit. Do any who are dead then possess faith ? Can any who are destitute of faith mix faith with the hearing of gospel preaching ? If they cannot mix faith with the hearing of the preached word, can they be pro- fited by the preaching I VTe in preaching say to all men, SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 171 as our Lord said to Nicodemos, ' Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.' But that saying or preaching is not gospel or glad tidings to those who would prefer to be saved in some other way. The sovereignty of God. predestination, election, regen- tion and the new birth, the preservation of the saints by grace to eternal glory, with all promises, instructions. admonitions, laws and ordinances of Christ, is gospel. because it is glad tidings to the meek, to the heaven-bom: but it is not gospel, because it is not glad tidings, to those who hate it. It is not mixed with faith in those who have no faith, and it cannot profit them." These Old Baptists teach that anv other doctrine ex- cept the doctrine of the Bible, as exemplified by Elder Beebe. is the doctrine of Antichrist, and is therefore not the gospel of Christ. Because the world loves all other doctrines, and all other doctrines affiliate and nego- tiate with the loved institutions of the world, and run after them, and reject the doctrine of the Bible as taught by the Old Baptists, because it is the doctrine as formulated and preached by Jesus Christ and his apos- tles. They say that the blessed Savior taught his dis- ciples, when he was about to leave them. " Ye have not chosen me. but I have chosen you. and ordained you that ye shall go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain ; that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in my name. He may give it to you. These things I com- mand you that ye love one another. If the world hate vou. ve know that it hated me before it hated vou. If 172 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. ye were of the world, the world would love his own ; but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." — St. John xv. 16, 20. "I have given them thy word, and the world hath hated them, because they are not of the world, even as I am not of the world." — St. John xvii. 14. " Marvel not, my brethren, if the world hate you." — I John hi. 13. They say that through his apostles he has taught them to "Have no fellowship with the un- fruitful works of darkness." — (Eph. v. 11.) And that these works of darkness are the religious institutions of men that are so zealously contended for by the religion- ists of the churches of Antichrist, and that when the children of God become entangled with these religious in- stitutions, and the church continues to hold them in church fellowship, that she is unfaithful to Jesus Christ, who has said, " Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the un- clean thing ; and I will receive you, and will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty." — II Cor. vi. 17, 18. And that such church members are falling away from the pattern of Christ, and are claiming citizenship with those who are strangers to the gospel of Jesus Christ, and are therefore disloyal to the mandates of the Captain of their salvation. Elder Beebe says, in his letter to the sister, "But I will attend to the passages to which you referred. First, Ezekiel hi. 16, 22. ' Son of man, I have made thee a watchman unto the house of Israel. ' Why not the house SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. L73 of Esau, and to everybody else ? Because the word of the Lord confined his charge to the house of Israel ; and if He had extended his watchcare to any other house or people, he would have disobeyed the Lord. He was com- manded to receive his instructions at God's mouth and from no other source. The house of Israel was the family of Israel, God's peculiar people; to that house, and to no other, God sent His prophets. To them, and to no * other people, He gave His law, as a covenant of works. And if the prophet Ezekiel had attempted to apply that law to the heathen nations round about them, and called on the Gentiles to wrangle with Israel, to be circumcised, and to worship in the temple at Jerusalem, he would have transgressed the commandment of his God. The law and the priesthood of the house of Israel differed from that of any other people. That law provided that when an Israelite had done wickedly, if he should turn from his wickedness and do that which was lawful and right, bring his sin offering to the priest, etc., he should be restored to his place and privileges in that house, and his wickedness should not be remembered. And if a righteous Israelite should turn from his righteousness and violate the law, his former righteousness should not be remembered. The responsible position of Ezekiel, as a watchman to the house of Israel, imposed on him the duty to receive the word at the mouth of God, and bear that word in every case precisely as he had received it from God. Hence we find him bearing his messages to Israel, and to her kings, her prophets and her priests, lfct SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. saying, ' The word of the Lord came unto me, saying/ etc. These, or similar words, preceded almost every message that he bore to them. As a watchman, he was to stand in the watch-tower, and watch for the word of the Lord ; and when the word of the Lord came to him, declaring either good or evil to the house of Israel, or to any who were of that house, he was to deliver his mes- sage faithfully, or he was charged with the consequence resulting from his negligence or disobedience. Now the house of Israel under the law was a type of the gospel church under law to Christ ; and the prophet was a type of, first, Christ as the prophet and bishop of his people, and secondly, of those who are called of God to the gospel ministry, to take the oversight of His flock. And the law which Israel was under was typical of the law and discipline of the gospel church. The law of Christ requires the gospel watchman to speak to the house of God, the church, the true and anti-typical house of Israel ; and the charge upon them is to bear no message that they have not received at the mouth of God, and faithfully to deliver or bear every word to the church, and to all who are of the household of God, just as they have received it from God ; and if they add to it, God will add to them the plagues which are written ; or if they take from it, God will take from them their part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city. — See Eev. xxii. 18, 19. Life and death by the law, to the children of Israel, prefigured gospel standing and fellow- ship in the gospel church, or expulsion therefrom by the SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 175 laws of the kingdom. If a gospel minister, as a watch- man on the walls of Zion, departs from the word of the Lord, fails to declare his word faithfully to the saints, or if he adds to the word of the Lord, preaching what he has no ' Thus saith the Lord ' for, whatever his standing has been, the laws and the discipline of the house of God will expel him from the holy city (the church) and erase his name from the registry of the living in Jerusalem. Death to the offending Israelite, under the law of Moses, answers to or is typical of exclusion from fellow- ship under the gospel. I cannot dwell as fully on every point as I would wish, without making my letter too long. 1 Wherefore I take you to record this day, that I am pure from the blood of all men ; for I have not shunned to declare unto you all the counsel of God,' (Acts xx. 26, 27,) to which you call my attention, appears to me both confirmatory and illustrative of what I have writ- ten on Ezekiel hi. 16, 22. Paul assured the Elders of the gospel church that he had not shunned to declare all the counsel of God. As a faithful watchman he had faith- fully delivered to those Elders and to the churches every word that he had received from the Lord, and therefore stood acquitted from the blood of all who in the churches should disregard the counsel of the Lord, and lose their standing in the church thereby. He was not responsible for their heresy or disorder, for he had faithfully warn- ed them, and with tears. And now, as he knew that he should see these Elders no more, he takes the opportun- 176 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. ity to exhort them to do as he had done ; for he recog- nized them also as watchmen, having been made over- seers of the flock of God, (but of no other flock,) to feed the church of God, which He hath purchased with His own blood. As watchmen they were to look out for those things which he knew would take place after His departure, and to faithfully warn the church of God to beware of wolves, and also to be on their guard against those of their own selves, who should rise up speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them, ' Therefore (he charged those Elders as watchmen,) watch, and re- member, that by the space of three years I ceased not to warn every one night and day with tears.' And yet he knew that some of these very Elders whom he had so faithfully warned would not heed his warnings; but he was pure from their blood, or from responsibility for their apostasy. But I cannot find here any admonition to the Elders to divide their watchcare, and bestow a part of their labor outside of the church of God, which He has purchased with His own blood, nor to try to persuade those grievous wolves, which should come, to change their wolfish nature, and become harmless lambs and sheep. A few words now on the last passage you referred me to : 'To open their eyes, and to turn them from dark- ness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me. ' SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 177 ■ — Acts xxvi. 18. This text beautifully expresses, in strong figurative words, the work to which God called Paul, and I believe it also shows what is the work of the gospel ministers generally. Let us see. ' To open their eyes ;' that is the eyes of those Gentiles to whom the Lord sent him. Now what would be the effect of open- ing the eyes of a dead man ? It certainly can be done. Experiments by galvanism have been made on dead bodies, causing their eyes to open, and other movements ; but can a dead person see any better with the eyes open, than when they are shut ? But apply the figure, as it is evidently intended, to those unto whom God has given spiritual life. When Jesus quickened Lazarus from the dead, and called him out of his grave, he came forth a living man ; but a napkin was on his face, and had to be removed before he could see. We cannot think the re- moving of the napkin while he was dead would have made him see. Your own case, my dear child, is in point. I have every assurance that you have passed from death unto life ; but you complain that there are some things you cannot yet see ; you have been laboring long to understand the true meaning of these Scriptures which you have called my attention to. You say it seems to you that if the Lord would give you light on the one point, everything else would be clear. Now you certainly have eyes to see, or you would never have seen your lost condition, or the salvation that is in Christ Jesus. As the apostle says, Eph. i. 18, 'The eyes of your understanding being enlightened, that ye might 178 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. know what is the hope of his calling,' etc. The great object of the preaching of the gospel is to edify and en- lighten the living children of God ; and as when onr eyes are closed, the light being thereby excluded from them, they require to be opened that they may see and enjoy the light, so Paul was sent to the Gentiles to open their eyes. He did not open the eyes of all the Gentiles, but those to whom God sent him. For God had a people among the Gentiles, who were sitting in darkness, surrounded by idolatry, and he was sent to enlighten them, and i to turn them from darkness to light.' God's living children are frequently involved in darkness ; but when the glorious light of the gospel shines even unto them, the preaching of the word dispels the darkness, and being delivered from the power of darkness, they gladly turn from it and have no fellowship with the un- fruitful works of darkness, but walk as children of the light. 'And from the power of Satan unto God.' It is said of God's children, that they ' were some time darkness ; but now are ye light in the Lord.' But as the light of the gospel is life (' In him was life, and the life was the light of men, ') so until they were quickened no preaching could possibly enlighten them, nor turn them from darkness to light. And in the darkness of death, in which they all were by nature involved, they were in the power of Satan, led captive by him at his will. But being now born of God, they have eyes to see, and ears to hear, and hearts to understand ; but still they require the gospel ministry to open to their view the things of SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. It9 the kingdom. The Gentile converts to whom God sent Panl required the instruction which was sent them from God, who is the Father of lights, to open their eyes, en- lighten their understanding, and deliver them from the errors they had cherished, and so deliver them from Satan's power, and lead them in the way of truth and righteousness. God had forgiven their sins and put them away by the one offering of Christ ; but the joyful reception of that forgiveness could not be felt or known until the eyes of their understanding were opened to know what was the hope of their calhng. When en- lightened by the Spirit, and instructed by the preached word, instead of continuing longer to commend them- selves to God by the works of the law, they gladly re- ceive the word, which assures them that all the pro- visions and promises of the gospel are unto them, and to their children, and to all them that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call, and then do they receive the forgiveness of their sins from him who is ex- alted a Prince and a Savior, to give repentance to Israel and the forgiveness of sins. This gift of repentance and remission of sins, being given to them as the children of God and heirs of immortality, is a part of their inheri- tance and establishes their interest in common with all the sanctified in all the fullness of the inheritance of the saints in light. They that are sanctified, consecrated, set apart to be saints and heirs of this divine inheritance, are so distinguished by faith, which is in God." I have now shown to you, my friends, from the facile 180 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. and illustrious pen (as these Old Baptists are pleased to call it) of one of the leading disciples of his day, the culminations of this heretical doctrine that they so viv- idly bring to bear upon the minds of those that they claim have been so powerfully illuminated by the Spirit of God shining into their hearts, making that great specialty that has been such a terror to me and my mis- sionaries through all the days of antiquity up to the present ; and their eloquence is almost equal to the elo- quence of Paul, who was also one of their great standard bearers, and their arguments are almost as conclusive as Paul's were when he was arraigned before King Agrippa and got permission to speak in his own defence, and said, "Whereupon, King Agrippa, I was not disobed- ient unto the heavenly vision." — Acts xxvi. 19. And they are equally bold in their assertions, regardless of all the intimidations and mockery that my missionaries can throw around them. I now see that we will have to add many new inven- tions to our missionary mills, before we will be able to check their onward march to victory ; and even then I fear that my disciples will not be able to compete with them. Their forces are truly small, but their soldiers are valiant and well disciplined, or they could never stand be- fore such an array of musketry as surrounds the vaults of my missionaries, and our cause is doomed to go down into the habiliments of disgrace and ruin forever, should we suffer such a defeat from such stupid intellects and inferior numbers. SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 181 And as our old system of straw beds in altars, to pro- tect the clothing of our finely attired convicts, while shouting and rendering praises to me and my mission- aries, has become stale and obsolete to some extent in its effects, I would advise you to follow the very in- teresting examples of my beloved disciples, Maj. Penn, Moody and Sankey, and others, whom I have impressed with the importance of a religious circus. This idea was conceived from the multitudes that attended the amusement circuses of Messrs. Eldrid, Eobinson Eey- nolds and others, of the United States and the Old World, and the vast amount of income that was incident to their menageries and side shows. And you well know that our motto is, not to be beaten at anything that will foster to the salvation of souls, and the support of my missionaries. These old ideas of straw pens, altars, camp-meetings, protracted meetings, anxious benches, etc., as instituted by one of my most lovely disciples, to- wit, John Wesley and his disciples, and afterwards adopted in part by one of my proudest modern disciples of Missionary Baptist notoriety, to- wit, Andrew Fuller and his disciples, has been a great lever in the salvation of many souls. But as machinery grows old and stale, new wheels and leverage must be added thereto, if we would keep pace with the age. I would therefore advise you, as soon as you can accumulate a sufficiency of money, that you purchase a large cloth tent, made of heavy ducking, that will cover near or quite a half -acre of land, in which to hold your revival meetings, and at the same 182 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. time have you several thousand circulars struck, and send them in advance of you, stating when you will be at a certain town or community, and that you will con- tinue the meeting from day to day until all the material who perchance can be induced or hoodwinked and cast into our missionary hopper, and ground through our missionary mill, and made into confirmed missionary Christians. After which you will move to some other locality ; not forgetting, however, to take up several collections while you stay ; for you well know that every business that is worth following must be self-sustaining, and the good people will ever be ready to pay you liber- ally for the vast amount of spiritual and moral good that you have done in their community. Another good idea is, that when you send your circulars in advance of you, publishing your appointments, that you select by ap- pointment some live Christian, within the limits of the prospective meeting, who will circulate a very feeling subscription among the good people, who are always zealous in their efforts to have the people saved ; and get as many obligations to have the meeting and minis- try sustained as possible. This will always answer as a kind of base, upon which the minister can act freely. Beside which, it will give publicity to the meeting, and cause many poor souls to come out and embrace salva- tion, that would otherwise be lost. And, of course, the more excitement you can get up, and the greater the display that you make, the more attendance and converts you will have. SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 183 In your revival meetings, you must not preach upon the doctrines of the New Testament. If you do, you will destroy the interest of the meeting. But you must preach upon the subject of practical religion, and con- clude with exhortation, anxious benches, and proposi- tions in every conceivable shape that you can put them, so as to beguile those who are too timid to be a hind- rance to the cause of Christianity. And if, perchance, there are some present who are too stubborn to accede to your propositions, and who contend as do these Old Bap- tists, that your system is the system and religion of Anti- christ, which system they are admonished in the New Testament to touch not, nor handle, lest they become partakers of your evil deeds, all such you can at once brand with infidelity, and say to them that they are there as monuments or pillars of stone, for the hind- rance of the gospel, and that their influence will be reck- oned against them on the day of final retribution. Per- haps in another decade the above stratagem in soul sav- ing will become inert, as has Mr. Wesley's and Mr. Ful- ler's plan, at which time the emergency of the case will suggest something new that will in all probability carry us through many years, without our having to fall upon the fogy pattern of Jesus Christ, his apostles, and these Old Baptists. I would suggest that in all of your religious exercises you watch the anxious benches, and those who are affected in the congregation, and especially the youths, many of whom are exceedingly timid in mat- ters of religion, and send the old sisters and gray-headed 184 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. sires, who are zealous of good works, to pray with and admonish them ; and if they succeed in wilting them down, and extract from them tears of contrition, you can then with complacency have the old sires and matrons take them by the hand and escort them to the altar or to the anxious benches, where you can with impunity tell them to repent of their sins, and that they can repent if they will, and if they will come to Jesus right, which is entirely within their power, that you will pledge them your soul for theirs if he does not bestow the blessing. Of course, many of them will find out that if the New Testament is true you have miserably lied to them ; but you know that it is only true in part, but you must pre- tend to believe it all. But such as impeach your honesty, unless they are well skilled in the Bible, which is not common with the young, you will soon be able to repulse, by making them believe that they themselves are the liars, by telling them that they did not come to the altar or to the anxious benches right ; that there was some secret sin that they did not give up, that they could have given up if they would. But if you happen to meet with one who understands and accepts the present translation of the Bible, who tells you that repentance is a gift, freely bestowed, and that it is not merited on account of good works, which gift, according to apostolic teachings, he cannot secure by works of obedience to the law, and that according to the teachings of the New Testament this gift is freely bestowed at a time when it was least expected, and of course unsought for, my advice to you SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 185 would be to let that personage alone, or laugh at his ignorance in a jocular way, and find some excuse to get into other society as soon as you can, or he or she, as the case may be, will expose your cause and injure your busi- ness. I would further advise, that when you have been successful in securing several mourners at your revival meetings, that you select several of the most pious and sanctified Christians to take charge of these mourners, and put them under rule, and not suffer them to associate with the unconverted, until their conversion has been made complete. These pious Christians, of course, must talk and pray with these mourners, and must not fail to have them attend each hour's service at the church or canvass, and they must constantly persuade them that their sins are forgiven, and that they feel sure that it is their duty to join the church ; and that " he that know- eth the Master's will, and doeth it not, shall be beaten with many stripes," and that if they will discharge their duty by connecting themselves with the church, they will experience a peace of mind that they have never be- fore realized. About this time it will be the duty of the minister to see them, and confirm all that has been said, by rehearsing his own experience, and making it harm- onize with the travail of the new convert. And of a truth my friends, nine out of ten, when all these mani- pulations are brought to bear upon them, will acknow- ledge that they have been changed, and will without fur- ther hesitancy join the church. And then for these Old 186 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. Baptists to say that our missionary mills will not grind out good Christians, is all homespun and bosh. It is further advisable in your revival meetings that you have a few old sisters who are well disciplined in exhortation, shouting and singing praises to your God, and a few old brothers who are gifted in offering up eloquent and exciting prayers ; and when the excitement is in full blast, your minister or some zealous old brother should relate, by way of exhortation, some miserable death-bed story of some wretched dying infidel or re- ligious skeptic, and contrast the scene with the death- bed joys of some pious old Christian, and point out in sympathetic strains of eloquence, the miseries of the one and the joys of the other, and then appeal to the dying congregation to come to the altar and anxious benches where prayer will be offered in their behalf to a throne of grace for the pardon of their sins ; and that if they fail to embrace the golden opportunity that is then offered to them in securing their eternal salvation, it may be that it will be too late, and that before another opportunity is offered they may find themselves in the awful habiliments of a never ending hell. About this moment the sympathetic tears will be trick- ling from every eye in the audience whose heart has been touched. And you should lose no time in sending the old sisters and brothers through the auditory to hunt out the timid mourners and conduct them to the altar and anxious benches for prayer to be offered for the sal- vation of their poor afflicted souls. And the minister SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 187 should lose no time in branding those who would not yield to the excitement, with infidelity and skep- ticism. During this excitement, some poor mourning soul whose nervous temperament predominates all the other temperaments of the physical organism, will in all prob- ability swoon or go off into a religious trance, and have to be borne away, to give nature a chance for resuscita- tion. This, my friends, is one of the most powerful, conclusive evidences to an audience of the genuineness of our cause ; for there really seems to be something in it that is supernatural, and it acts more powerfully upon the human senses than the most gigantic freak of leger- demain in a sleight-of-hand show. Under all of these convincing circumstances of the justness of our cause, if there should be any of the be- lievers or disciples of these old predestinarian, tight-fisted, iron-jacket, hard-shell, forty-gallon, brown-jeans, close- communion, vulgar, feet-washing, always-right, and everybody-else-wrong, kind of Baptists present, they will just simply wilt under our influence. And should they attempt to disabuse the minds of the people, as they would term it, and claim that our conversions are a freak of hallucination, or mental delusion, produced from ani- mal excitement or human sympathy, and that it is des- titute of the seasoning efficacy of the grace of God, and attempt to quote any of the old apostles, prophets, or Jesus Christ, to prove their position, and to tell you, "For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, 188 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. as in all churches of the saints " (I Cor. xiv. 33); and that it is reproachful for the old sisters to exhort and pray aloud in the churches of the saints, " Let your women keep silence in the churches ; for it is not permitted unto them to speak ; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law. • And if they will learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home ; for it is a shame for women to speak in the church." (I Cor. xiv. 34, 35). But that God suffered such confusion in the churches of Antichrist ; so that all the saints who have been taught in the school of heaven, and who have been under the discipline and tuition of the true and faithful ministers of Jesus Christ ; will be able to see the discrepancy between those who serve their God in a tumult, and those who serve God in quietude, as becom- eth all genuine Christians. But public opinion is so fully convinced in our favor that nothing but a super- natural, power could convince them, and that no such miraculous conversions, as their eyes have witnessed in our religious exercises, could be otherwise than genuine. And these old fogies, in many instances, will actually shrink from speaking their sentiments, because public opinion will frown them down, and hiss them from society. You have science, intellect, numbers and pub- he opinion on your side, and have nothing to fear, ex- cept their so-called Bible quotations ; and with your in- genuity you can always pervert and evade them in such a way as to keep public opinion in your favor. When your meeting is over, it will be the duty of some SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 189 live, energetic Christian to canvass the town or commu- nity in which you have held the meeting, with a very feeling and sympathetic appeal to the good people, by way of subscription, in the interest of the treasury of the Lord, to pay the minister an extra fee for the great sacrifice that he has made, in leaving his wife and dear ones, and the churches of his home, who required all his time and energies, but that he had torn loose from them for a short time, and had come a long distance, to save the inhabitants of the town or conmiunity. Of course you will get several dollars, halves and quarters, many of which will be given reluctantly ; but the people will give them in order to keep pace with society and public opinion. I have now advised you as best I could, in a systematic programme of saving souls, but do not intend to limit you in means and instrumentalities. Should you at any time see that new wheels or new cogs to the wheels of our missionary mills would foster to the salvation of souls, you will at once introduce them ; for I verily be- lieve that the time is approaching when our present, sys- tem will become stale, and will fail to sustain my mis- sionaries. At which time I would advise that you re- quire and accept admission fees, before you allow the people seats inside our canvas or missionary circus. Of course many persons will pay it, rather than take the chances of losing their souls. Many of our fine city churches require rents for pews now, which is the same thing in substance. According 190 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. to the present laws of our land and nation, it would be unlawful for us to receive admission fees for any kind of menagerie without paying taxes, and of course some evil one would take advantage of the law and expose our cause before the courts, and in all probability prove that our fees were for selfish motives, instead of being in- tended for the advancement of Christianity. And should they use the law of the present New Testament to prove the correctness of true Christianity, they would inflict heavy penalties upon us. Before you adopt this plan you had best send lobbyists to your legislatures and have them manipulate with the members, and repeal the law in such a way as to allow a religious circus to exhibit without taxation. These Old Baptists may howl and claim that your theory is not authorized by the teachings of the New Testament, and is therefore in violation of the laws of high heaven, and repulsive to all saints who have been educated in the school of heaven. But how was it pos- sible for the writers of the Old and New Testaments to have known the exigencies of the religion of the present age? It might have answered every purpose in their day, but positively fails to meet the indications of the nineteenth century. Much of what they have written is left in such a form that it has a tendency to confuse instead of enlighten my missionaries as to the proper means to be used in the conversion and salvation of the people of the present age. SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 191 These Old Baptists may contend that the Old and New Testament Scriptures are exactly in harmony, and that they were intended to govern all the saints, and that they are indeed their monitor or guide, and will be a com- pass to all regenerated saints, from the commencement to the end of time ; and that any person or persons, or corporation of Christians, or so-called Christians, who transcend or fall short of their prescribed metes and bounds, are guilty of a trespass against the laws of high heaven, and are therefore subjects of punishment, as prescribed by the New Testament. The Christian who is a violator of the law is punished by afflictions in many ways, and repentance, but is finally saved through the atonement and blood of Jesus Christ. The so-called Christian who has never been regenerated and born again is also punished with many trials and afflictions, but without that godly sorrow or repentance that need- eth not to be repented of, and are lost or banished from the peaceful presence of God. They will further tell you that the pattern is left upon record, from the first of Genesis to the last of Eeveiation, and that the pattern forbids the Christian or man ol God from doing anything in a church capacity, or otherwise in the ser- vice of God, that is not specified in the word of God, but commands all the regenerated people of God to do all that is written in the New Testament, as a church ordin- ance or Christian duty. They will commence with Abra- ham, and defy you to prove that Abraham ever went be- yond the limits of the Lord. They then refer you to 192 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. Moses, who obeyed the Lord and stopped, except on one occasion, when he spoke in anger to the children of Israel, for which he was severely punished. Noah did pre- cisely as God commanded in building the ark, and went no further. They will carry you to all the old partri- archs, and defy you to prove that they ever went fur- ther than the Lord commanded, without receiving the chastisement annexed to disobedience. They will then call your attention to the old prophets, to wit, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, etc., and ask you for heaven's sake to show them where it is upon record that they wrote or did anything by way of serving God, only as they received instructions from the angel of the Lord, and then waited patiently for another order from God. They will tell you that Jonah refused to obey the com- mands of God, and for a punishment he was caused to be swallowed by a whale, and lay in the belly of hell for three days, and was vomited up on dry land, and was made willing, even anxious, to obey the Lord by preach- ing to the Ninevites. They will refer you to the fifteenth " chapter of 1st Samuel, where Samuel was sent by the Lord to Saul, who was to be anointed king over Israel, saying to Saul, " Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not ; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass." — I Samuel xv. 3. And when Saul returned to Samuel he reported, " I have performed the commandment of the Lord. And Samuel said, What meaneth then this bleating of the sheep in mine ears, and SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 193 the lowing of the oxen which I hear ? " — I Samuel xv. 13, 14. Saul rendered an excuse, and said that these fat animals were brought along by the people, and were not destroyed, that they might be sacrificed to the Lord. And for Saul's disobedience the kingdom of Israel was rent from him, and was given to one of his neighbors, who was more obedient to the commands of the Lord. They will also tell you that these fat animals that were brought along, in violation of the commands of the Lord, under the pretence of a sacrifice to the Lord, that were to have been utterly destroyed by Saul, are a type of the fat things that my missionaries carry with them, under the pre- tence of sacrificing them to the Lord. And instead of their idols being named oxen, sheep, camels, asses, etc., they are called fat salaries, foreign missions, home mis- sions, executive committees, publishing societies, theo- logical schools, Sunday schools, together with all the other institutions and commandments of men that are taught for doctrines, which the Lord has commanded shall be utterly destroyed. " Touch not, taste not, han- dle not ; which all are to perish with the using ; after the commandments and doctrines of man." — Col. ii. 21, 22. "But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men." — Mat. xv. 9. And that for carrying these fat things, and teaching these false doctrines, my missionaries shall be rent from the kingdom of Israel, (the church) as was Saul. And that the lowing of the oxen is a type of the bellowing of the nobles of my missionaries for more money to be sacri- 194 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. ficed to the Lord in the building up of giant religious monopolies, in the shape of orphan homes, sectarian schools, theological schools, etc., of which they them- selves are to be the instructors ; who tell you that their lives and all their energies shall be spent in said institu- tions, for the salvation of the people and their posterity, that would otherwise be lost. And that the bleating of the sheep typifies the more congenial voice of the smaller fry of my missionaries, in their importunities to the laity and friends for more means and instrumentalities to be offered as a sacrifice to the Lord to save the Amale- kites (heathen) from endless perdition, whom the Lord has commanded that they shall be utterly destroyed. They will then refer you to the tenth chapter of Jeremiah and the sixth chapter of Amos, and con- demn all your instrumental church music, and accuse you of serving your God mechanically, instead of fol- lowing the pattern of serving God in spirit, by sing- ing songs of praise with the spirit and with the under- standing. Your decorated altars and organs they will call idols, and they will prove that the use that you make of them is typified in the Scriptures as idolatrous wor- ship, and that the true Israel of God has ever received punishment when they presumed to transcend the pattern of God in their zeal to gratify the arrogance of human pride. They will then carry you to the book of Exodus, and show you where God caused the children of Israel to borrow the jewels of the Egyptians, which jewels they SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 195 did not return to their owners, and that God suffered the Israelites to carry the jewels across the Eed Sea, that He might punish them with their borrowed jewels, when they presumed to disobey the commands of Moses, who received instruction from God. And the children of Is- rael murmured against Moses, "And Aaron said unto them, Break off the golden earrings which are in the ears of your wives, of your sons, and of your daughters and bring them unto me." — Exodus xxxii. 2. And when Aaron had made the jewels into a molten calf, and pre- pared an altar, they worshiped before the idols, and call- ed them the gods of Israel. And for a punishment G-od caused Moses to burn the calf and grind it into powder ; and he strewed it upon the water, and made the children of Israel drink of it. And that this punishment upon national Israel for their disobedience to the commands of God as a nation, through the medium of Moses, is a type of the punishment of spiritual Israel (church) when she disobeys the mandates of heaven, through the med- ium of Jesus Christ, who is the antitype of Moses. And that all the true Israel of Christ's spiritual kingdom who have at any time connected themselves with the Anti- christian kingdoms (false churches), who by affiliating with those kingdoms are bidding them God-speed by par- taking of their evil deeds, has and will ultimately have to drink deep of the bitter waters that are poisoned with the powdered jewels that they have borrowed of the na- tions of Antichrist, (false churches.) After reciting many other allegories and examples of punishment upon 196 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. national Israel for disobedience to the commands of God, prefiguring the punishment of spiritual Israel for their disobedience to the mandates of heaven, they will carry you to the New Testament, (which is a complete testi- mony of the fulfillment of the prophecies and forerun- ners in the old Testament,) and defy you before high heaven to show them where it is upon record in the sacred volume of truth that the apostles or the disciples of Jesus Christ ever transcended or fell short of the pre- scribed commands of the great Captain of their eternal salvation, without receiving the punishment annexed to their disobedience ; but in all things did precisely as com- manded by the King of kings, before their work was re- ceived and accepted by the great Kedeemer of souls. They will tell you that in the fourth chapter of St. Matthew, where the devil was trying to tempt Jesus, "Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God." (Claiming himself as the devil's God ; and, indeed, the devils in hell are subject to his commands, and obey him.) " Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and showeth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them, and said unto him, All these things will I give thee if thou wilt fall down and worship me. Then said Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan ; for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve. Then the devil leaveth him ; and behold, angels came and ministered unto him." But that my missionaries have accepted the propositions of SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 197 the devil, and have affiliated with the kingdoms of this world, (false churches and other institutions that are not authorized by Jesus Christ) and are actually worshiping the grandeur, arrogance and wealth of these kingdoms, more than the church or pattern of Jesus Christ, and are destitute of that Christian grace or fortitude that would say, "Get thee hence, Satan;" and are running after other gods, ignoring the command of high heaven, " Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and Him only shalt thou serve." They further teach that my missionaries bind heavy burdens upon the people, and refer you to the following Scripture, "For they bind heavy burdens and grievous to be borne, and lay them on men's shoulders ; but they themselves will not move them with one of their fingers. But all of their works they do to be seen of men : they make broad their phylacteries, and enlarge the borders of their garments, and love the uppermost rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the synagogues." — St. Mat. xxiii. 4, 7. They further teach that the Old School or Primitive Baptists are the only organized body of saints under the canopy of heaven that follow the precise pattern of Jesus Christ, without any variableness or shadow of turning, in all of the church ordinances and Christian duties, as prescribed in the New Testament Scriptures, without any additions or diminutions of so-called church ordinances and Christian duties. "Go ye, therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the 198 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Teach- ing them to observe all things whatsoever I have com- manded you ; and lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world. Amen. 1 ' — Mat. xxviii. 19, 20. And that there is no inducement that could be offered that would cause them to observe anything as an auxili- ary to assist Christ in the designs of his gospel, or to further the accomplishment of the great Author of their eternal salvation. And should they presume to do so, that they would be doing violence to the commands of high heaven ; for they are admonished in the 18th and 19th verses of the last chapter of Eevelation, neither to, add to nor take from under a heavy penalty. They must therefore preach truth and expose error. Preach the gospel of Jesus Christ and nothing else. Preach Jesus Christ and him crucified, and nothing more. Preach repentance to sinners, and stop. Baptize those who believe the gospel of Jesus Christ ; who believe that Jesus shed his blood especially for those whom the Father gave him before the world began, and no one else. Receiving as candidates for baptism those who can give a satisfactory reason of their hope in Christ Jesus, and no one else. Rejecting all who are not willing to submit to the ordi- nance of baptism by immersion, as taught by Jesus Christ. Requiring all to be baptized by a regularly or- dained minister of the gospel, and rejecting the baptism of all so-called ministers of the gospel who are in disorder by affiliating with the kingdom of Antichrist, (false SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 199 churches and the institutions of the world.) Also requir- ing all the saints who are in the fellowship of the church to partake of the Lord's supper, wash the saints' feet, look after the poor of the flock, and care for the necessi- ties of their pastor in a proper way. Sing hymns of praise to God, and in their prayers thank God for His many blessings and mercies that He has bestowed upon them, and implore Him for a continuation of the same, together with all things that He has enjoined upon them to pray for ; and that His will be done in all things, and not theirs ; and that it would be mockery in the sight of God for them to dictate to God what they would have Him do for them, as do my missionaries. And that the commandment of Jesus Christ and his apostles to go and preach the gospel, forbids them from preaching any other doctrine than the doctrine of salvation by grace, independent of all the auxiliaries that have ever been in- stituted by the devices of men or devils. " For by grace are ye saved, through faith ; and that not of yourselves ; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest any man should boast."— Eph. ii. 8, 9. "But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed." — Gal. i. 8. These Old Baptists will actually mock you, by telling you that you do not believe the Scriptures, and that if you did you would be ashamed to adopt their teachings, and that you are too vain to be governed by their ordin- ances and duties ; and that many of you are too dignified 200 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. to reproach the elegance of your raising by submitting to the lowliness of the examples and precepts of Jesus Christ's teachings ; and that you are compelled to per- vert the meaning of the Scriptures to accommodate your devices in evading the ordinances and duties as pre- scribed by Jesus Christ and his apostles. And that if this was not the case, and you were actually children of God's mercy and grace, you would not be willing to per- vert the Scriptures, but would be willing, yea, anxious, to go down into the water, even before a multitude, and be buried with Christ in baptism, according to the pat- tern of Jesus Christ. You would also be willing to humble yourselves in the very dust of humility, and lay aside your garments, and gird yourselves with a towel, and wash the saints' feet, as exemplified by Jesus Christ and his apostles, as well as to partake of the emblems of his broken body and spilt blood. " Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of me and my words, in this adulterous and sinful generation, of him also shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he cometh in the glory of his Father with the holy angels." — Mark viii. 38. " And it came to pass in those days that Jesus came from Nazareth of Galilee, and was baptized of John in Jordan. And straightway coming up out of the water, he saw the heavens opened, and the Spirit like a dove descending upon him."— Mark i. 9, 10. " Know ye not that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death ? Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death ; that like as Christ was SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 201 raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection." — Kom. vi. 3, 5. " Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the oper- ation of God, who hath raised him from the dead."— Col. ii. 12. " And he commanded the chariot to stand still : and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch ; and he baptized him." — Acts viii. 38. They will tell you that there is no intellect that is so tardy or bounding, who has been sufficiently humiliated in their travail from nature to grace, whose human pride has been killed to the common devices of human ingen- uity, who does not know that the above quotations were exemplified in baptism by immersion. And that it would have been absurdly miraculous, and the idea ridiculous, for Jesus to have come to John and demanded baptism at his hands in the river Jordan, when sprink- ling or pouring would have been equally valid ; and if so, water could have been procured for such purposes at any of the common watering places of f amilies or from the small tributaries by the wayside. But it seems to have required much water ; hence, how foolish it would have been for Jesus to have gone down into a river of water to get such a pittance of water as is required in sprinkling and pouring. "Then cometh Jesus from Galilee to Jordan unto John, to be baptized of him. But 202 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. John forbade him, saying, I have need to be baptized of thee, and comest thou to me ? And Jesus answering, said unto him, Suffer it to be so now ; for thus it becom- eth us to fulfill all righteousness. Then he suffered him. And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water {not from the water) ; and, lo, the heav- ens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him." — Mat. hi. 13, 17. And that the humble saint of God must be buried with Him in baptism, planted with Him, together with the likeness of His death ; and that this baptism, burying or planting, is a type of His death, burial and resurrection; and that it is impossible for sprinkling or pouring to be baptism, for the subject of baptism cannot be buried or planted by this process, but must be immersed, in order to correspond with the antitype. And that they cannot feel themselves to be baptized until they have been buried in baptism after the pattern of Christ. And that Jesus Christ and Paul testify of but one baptism. " One Lord, one faith, one baptism." — Eph. iv. 5. But that many of my missionaries testify of three modes of baptism ; sprinkling, pouring and immersion ; and they claim them all as the pattern of Jesus Christ. This being the case, Jesus was baptized three times, of which we have no re- cord. And that Jesus testified to Mcodemus, " Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he camiot enter into the kingdom of God." — John iii. 5. And they ren- der it thus : That being born of the Spirit of God is an SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 203 evidence to the child of God, of their eternal union with Christ. " He that belie veth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself. " — I John v. 10. Hence this new man has a bright hope and promise of eternal life. " Who- soever is born of God doth not commit sin ; for His seed remaineth in him ; and he cannot sin, because he is born of God." — I John hi. 9. But that being " born of water," independent of being " born of the Spirit," has nothing to do with eternal life, but is the door "into the king- dom of God," which is Christ's church militant. " The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us, (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ." — I Pet. hi. 21. And that it is impossible to be born without you are first enveloped in the substance out of which you are born. And as baptism is one of the ordinances of Christ's kingdom, (church,) it is obligatory upon every regenerated child of grace to be buried with Christ in baptism, by a legal ad- ministrator, before they can possibly claim church fel- lowship with the baptized believers in Christ's church ; and that one of the strongest evidences of being a fol- lower and believer in Christ's kingdom is, "If ye love me, keep my commandments." — John xiv. 15. And the plain inference is that you must not, in a church sense, keep any other commandments. "But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men." — Mat. xv. 9. After bringing forth all this array of testimony in favor 204 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. of immersion being the only authorized mode of baptism, and that Jesus and his apostles taught no other mode, and that no ordained minister of Christ's kingdom dare practice or receive any other, without violating one of the ordinances of high heaven, for which a just punish- ment would inevitably follow, and result in the mortifi- cation and humiliation of the people of God, they will then mock you by asking you for heaven's sake to show them the chapter and verse in the New Testament where sprinkling or pouring was practiced or recognized by Jesus or any of his apostles as gospel baptism, or the door into Christ's kingdom or church ; but that in every in- stance where sprinkling or pouring is mentioned in the New Testament it typifies or illustrates something that is foreign to gospel baptism. They will positively chal- lenge our system of baptizing infants, when it is patent to every intelligent thinker that if there are any persons under the canopy of heaven who are in that state of innocency arid freedom from sin and the common vices that are incident to riper years, which evils the law and church requires total abstinence to secure eternal salvation, it is surely the infant, of whom Jesus hath said that the kingdom of heaven is composed ; and then to deny them the right of baptism, is absurd and ridiculous ; for such innocency is the composition and element of heaven, and is so regarded by Jesus himself. ' 4 Then were there brought unto him little children, that he should put his hands on them, and pray ; and the disciples rebuked them. But Jesus said, suffer little SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 205 children, and forbid them not, to come unto me ; for of such is the kingdom of heaven. And he laid his hands on them, and departed thence." — Mat. xix. 13, 16. But these Old Baptists will defy you to show them the chap- ter and verse where Jesus or any of his apostles ever baptized one of them, and are presumptuous enough to undertake to prove that our interpretations of these Scriptures are unwarranted perversions of the word of God, and that the true meaning of them is foreign to baptism. They will undertake to prove that these little children that Jesus exhibits in these Scriptures are a type of the regenerated children of God, who have been humiliated in their travail from nature to grace ; and have been made by the mighty influence of the Holy Spirit to become as helpless and dependent upon Jesus for suc- cor and help at a time of need when the poor child of God had exhausted all his own strength, and had to give up all hope of salvation from his own efforts, and had fallen prostrate at the feet of Jesus, never to rise again in his own strength, becoming as helpless and depend- ent upon Jesus as the infant is upon its natural mother or nurses for natural sustenance ; and that an infant is the most helpless and dependent of all others of the animal species, and has to be raised by its natural mother or nurses to its mother's breast to receive natural food ; and that in like manner the heaven-born child is equally helpless and dependent upon Jesus and his church for spiritual food, and has to be raised by Jesus in the par- don of his sins, and given that spiritual nourishment 206 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. through the medium of the church aud her servants, (ministers,) independent of the effort of the new born babe of Christ ; which spiritual food is necessary to the full development of spiritual manhood ; and that unless you become thus like little children, you cannot enter the kingdom. ' % And Jesus called a little child unto him, and set him in the midst of them, and said, verily I say unto you, except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven. Whosoever therefore shall humble himself as this little child, the same is greatest in the kingdom of heaven.*' — Mat. xviii. 2, 5. " Whosoever shall not receive the king- dom of God as a little child, he shall not enter therein." Mark x. 15. But you know that we baptize infants in lieu of circum- cision, and that circumcision was instituted by Abraham and Moses, under the auspices of God ; and that Moses was a type of Christ ; and that when Christ came into the world he fulfilled the law of Moses, and set up a new dispensation, and instituted baptism as the antitype of circumcision ; and we dare not neglect the baptism of our infants, without hazarding their eternal salvation ; because circumcision was positively enjoined upon all Israel, who was at that time the favored people of God, and was a type of His church. And we feel under equal obligations to christen or initiate our children into his church, by applying to them the holy ordinance of bap- tism, leaving the visible marks of Christ's church upon them, as was left upon the national babes of Israel, in SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 207 the circumcision of the Jews, under the law of Moses. But these Old Baptists will ask you, in the name of heaven's God, why do you baptize female infants or female adults ; when there is not a verse or chapter in the Bible that would even feign to establish the incon- sistency of female circumcision ? And therefore your presumed antitype for circumcision is as false as its founders are inconsistent. But national Israel was really a type of spiritual Israel. "For they are not all Israel which are of Israel." — Rom. ix. 6. Showing conclus- ively that they did not all belong to spiritual Israel that were circumcised and belonged to national Israel ; but that circumcision was a national mark put upon them to distinguish them from other nations, and prevent them from marrying, amalgamating, or affiliating with other nations, as prescribed by God to the patriarchs and Moses his law-giver, and has nothing to do with gospel baptism. And that since the coming of Christ the anti- type of this national mark of circumcision is and will be written in the hearts of all spiritual Israel, and is mani- fested in their daily walk and godly conversation, and is as patent to the man of God as was the mark of circum- cision to the law givers of national Israel. "For he is not a Jew which is one outwardly ; neither is that cir- cumcision which is outward in the flesh ; but he is a Jew which is one inwardly ; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter ; whose praise is not of men, but of God."— Rom. ii. 28, 29. And that in a gospel or church sense they are commanded by 208 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW, Jesus Christ and his apostles not to marry, amalgamate, nor affiliate with any other nations, (false churches and other institutions of men not authorized by God,) but to hold themselves aloft to any of the ordinances of men that are not specifically authorized in the word of God, lest they become partakers of their evil deeds. ' ' If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house neither bid him God speed ; for he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds." — II John 10, 11. In bidding them God speed they subject themselves to the punishment that would be inflicted by the law governing the church or spiritual Israel, as typified by the punishment of those who violated the law of national Israel. They will assert to you that infants are not subjects of baptism ; and that baptism hinges upon belief ; and belief hinges upon testimony ; and that faith is the result of belief ; and that the infant is not capacitated to receive testimony and belief; neither can they act faith, and there- fore cannot be received into the church upon the testimony required of the saints. ' 'But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts; and be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you a reason of the hope that is in you, with meekness and fear. "—I Pet. iii. 15. And that infants cannot do this, and that the sprinkling and pouring, as instituted for baptism, and the manner of receiving in- fants into the church, is all mockery, not being author- ized by God. "And He said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 209 that believeth and is baptized shall be saved ; but he that believeth not shall be damned.'' — Markxvi. 15, 16. They contend that these apostles did go into all the then in- habited world, and preached the gospel to every creature. And that all to whom G-od gave spiritual ears, spiritual eyes and a circumcised spiritual heart, did believe, and were baptized by immersion into the church of Jesus Christ. And that it is not upon record where the apostles baptized any except those who did believe. And that infants were wholly incompetent to receive the testimony required to believe. And that the preaching of the apostles was only a testimony or witness to those who did believe after they had received the testimony of be- lief through the operation of the Spirit, giving them spiritual discernment, so that they could believe and be baptized according to the command given by the Savior ; and therefore infants are excluded from gospel baptism. " He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved ; but he that believeth not shall be damned." — Mark xvi. 16. And, also, that even baptism is " not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good con- science toward God." Therefore there is no eternal sal- vation in baptism, consequently they say that our theory would damn or send to endless perdition all infants who have not arrived at the age of moral accountability. And that we are compelled, according to these Scriptures, to damn them for unbelief , because they are incompetent to believe, and that baptism cannot secure for them eter- nal salvation. And that the command to preach the 210 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. gospel to every creature was not designed to be heard by natural infants, nor was it designed to be heard in a gospel sense by larger children nor adults, except those to whom God has given spiritual discernment. And therefore my missionaries must be wanting in that spirit- ual discernment that is peculiar to the saints of God. They say that you have accused them of teaching that there are infants in hell not a span long ; and they con- tend that the accusation is strictly false, and that the Old Baptists are the only organized body of saints under the heavens that preach a positive infant salvation. They say that the infant was saved in the covenant of grace between the Father and the Son before the world began, and upon the same principle of God's amazing mercy as was the covenanted adult. And that God has quit sav- ing and damning souls thousands of years ago, and that all who are saved or lost were saved or lost in the coven- ant between the Father and Son before the world was. And all the lost have been lost from the commence- ment of time, and that all the saved have been saved from the commencement of time ; and that there are no times with God, but is ever to-day with Him. "But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day." — II Pet. hi. 8. And that all things, Present, past and future, were as much in open view to God at the commencement of time as they are to-day, or as they will be at the final consummation of all things. " Remember the former things of old; for I am God, SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 211 and there is none else ; I am God, and there is none like me, declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, my counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure." — Is. xlvi. 9, 10. Consequently He is not at present on any baby- saving expedition, nor is He losing babies for want of belief or baptism, but is manifesting His love and mercy toward them all along through time, as it seemeth good unto Him, and is taking them home to Himself at the time of His own good pleasure. But that they believe that they are regenerated in the hour and article of death ; but they do not know this, it being one of the secrets known to God. "The secret things belong unto the Lord our God ; but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law." — Deut. xxix. 29. But that there is one thing that they do know ; that there is one case put upon record where there was one infant who, owing to a powerful transition, leaped for joy in his mother's womb. "And it came to pass that when Elizabeth heard the salutation of Mary, the babe leaped in her womb ; and Elizabeth was filled with the Holy Ghost ; and she spake out with a loud voice, and said, Blessed art thou among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb. And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me ? For, lo, as soon as the voice of thy salutation sounded in mine ears, the babe leaped in my womb for joy." — Luke i. 41, 45. They say 21*2 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. that they cannot see why, if God would communicate His Spirit to a babe in foetal life, that He should not be- stow the same blessing upon babes in infantile life. They further contend that it cannot be proven from Bible testi- mony, that one of the heirs of perdition, one whom the Father did not covenant with his Son to give him, ever died in infancy, but that the command was given that the tares should not be plucked up, lest the wheat might be destroyed ; but they were to remain with the wheat until harvest, and were not to be destroyed in infancy : but at maturity they were to be gathered* and burned. " The field is the world : the good seed are the children of the kingdom : but the tares are the children of the wicked one." — Mat. xiii. 38. But you well know, my friends, that our motto is, Not to be beaten ; and if we could ever succeed in convincing the youths of this, or even the next generation, that our system of baptizing infants is correct, and that infants are really subjects of gospel baptism, and induce all orthodox churches to adopt our system, we would then have all the infants of each generation baptized at eight days old, according to the pattern of circumcision, of which baptism is the anti- type. We would then wipe out this old fogy believer's baptism, the result of which would be to annihilate their inconsistencies, and their present Bible, as translated by King James. We would then be able to establish by vote at the ballot box laws that would sustain our Christian institutions and support our ministry. Because we would all see eye to eye, and understand SUPPOSED INTER VIE W. 213 the Scriptures alike, and would have no trouble in legal- izing our local option and prohibition laws ; we could impose our Sunday school literature and catechisms upon all the children alike, and force them and their refractory parents to accept our system of religion. And, in fact, all our Christian and benevolent institutions could be legalized, of which institutions the present Bible is silent upon ; in consequence of which these Old Baptists are ever harping upon our innovations upon primitive doc- trine. " Then they that gladly received His word were bap- tized ; and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls." — Acts ii. 41. Xow, my friends, all intelligent people know that it would have been impossible for Peter to have baptized three thou- sand souls by immersion in one day, and that of necessity he was compelled to have sprinkled the water upon them in groups, to have accomplished such a wonderful work in so short a time. We will suppose, for the sake of reason and argument, that Peter did baptize them by im- mersion, and that he used twelve hours in the day ; he would have baptized one about every fourth of a minute; and if he used the twenty four hours in baptizing them, he baptized one about every half minute ; and you know that it requires more time than this to repeat the shortest ceremony that could be used in a legal gospel baptism; Besides this, Peter would not have had time to obey any of the laws of health, and his physical system would have completely given way for want of rest and nourishment. 21-1 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. But these Old Baptists will tell you that the eleven apostles were there, (Judas having abandoned them in the betrayal of the Lord,) all of whom were legal adminis- trators of the ordinance of baptism, and were actively engaged in the work of the ministry. And should they have used twelve hours in the day, they would have bap- tized about two hundred and seventy-two persons each, and would have consumed about two and three-fourths minutes with each. And if they had used twenty-four hours, they would have baptized one about every five and a half minutes. See Luke x. 1 . And you will see that the Lord appointed seventy others and clothed them with the same authority. And should they, or any part of them, have been present, it would have made the task much lighter, and no person's health o.r constitution Wi >ald have been injured, and much time would have been given for preaching and exhortation. After all this systematic reasoning and mathematical research, they will tell you that those three thousand souls that were added to the disciples on that memorable occasion were not necessarily compelled to have been baptized on the day of their belief or conversion, and that the text does not say that they were baptized on that same day, but that they were added to the disciples, by gladly receiving Peter's words ; and that baptism could have easily been deferred until another time, giving Peter ample opportun- ity to have baptized all of them, without violating any of the laws of health. But you know that Jesus Christ would not have instituted such indecencies as immersion SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 215 and feet washing, as church ordinances and Christian duties, and impose it upon the female members of his church, without making some provision for a substitute under certain circumstances. Hence the necessity of sprinkling timid females and children, for baptism, and washing the saints' feet at private houses. Baptism by immersion and feet washing before the multitude would not only jeopardize their health, but would reflect upon their refinement. To say the least of it, the practice would be very humiliating to their refinement and pride, if they had been well raised and educated in the higher circles of life. There are but few elegantly refined ladies who would respect the testimony of Jesus Christ if it could be proven beyond cavil that he did institute such ridiculous practices as these, and enjoin them upon the female members of his church. For the sake of argument, we will admit that Jesus did institute feet washing, and that he did enjoin it upon his disciples. Do you not know that he would have had more respect for females than to have imposed such in- decent duties upon them before the multitudes, when the same act of kindness could have been bestowed upon the poor, afflicted saints at any of their private houses ? We could not presume to accuse Jesus of introducing any such humiliating practices. In the name of common sense, what good could it possibly do to humiliate Chris- tians in this way when these Old Baptists themselves admit that there is no eternal life in either of these vul- gar practices ? And I cannot believe that Jesus actually 216 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. requires any such things of females. You will now please excuse me for referring you to the Scriptures, and the arguments of these Old Baptists, for they propose to " Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." — I Thes. v. 21. After the apostles had partaken with Jesus of the Lord's supper, ' ' He riseth from supper, and laid aside his garments, and took a towel, and girded himself . After that he poureth water into a basin, and began to wash the disciples' feet, and to wipe them with the towel wherewith he was girded. Then cometh he to Simon Peter : and Peter saith unto him, Lord, dost thou wash my feet ? Jesus answered and said unto him, What I do thou knowest not now ; but thou shalt know hereafter. Peter saith unto him, thou shalt never wash my feet. Jesus answered him, If I wash thee not, thou hast no part with me. Simon Peter saith unto him, Lord, not my feet only, but also my hands and my head." — John xiii. 4, 10. "If I, then, your Lord and Master, have washed your feet, ye also ought to wash one another's feet. For I have given you an example, that ye should do as I have done to you." — John xiii. 14, 15. " If ye know these things, happy are ye if ye do them." — John xiii. 17. While they contend that these examples given to them by Jesus himself, have nothing to do with their eternal salvation and spiritual union with Christ, and are there- fore not essential to their eternal salvation, but that the adoption of them in Christ's church is essential to Chris- tian duty, and that the salvation of Christ's church mil- itant is greatly dependent upon them, in that of exem- SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 217 plifying the examples of Jesus himself, thereby preserv- ing the precise pattern of Jesus, without any additions or diminutions, so that his church may be preserved un- sullied from all the devices and traditions of men or devils ; and that when his true disciples have done this, they have a conscience that is void of offence toward God ; and should they at any time fail to see the real im- port of the ordinance or duty, they can but do as did Peter, when the Lord told him, ' 'What I do thou knowest not now, but thou shalt know hereafter ; " and therefore with patience wait for knowledge ; nevertheless they comply with the example, as Jesus bids you, it being es- sential to Christian duty and church preservation ; and that they must emphatically do this as true followers of Christ, regardless of all the humilition of their natural pride or worldly aspirations. " For I have given you an example, that ye should do as I have done to you." And, " If ye know these things, happy are ye if ye do them." Now, sirs, these Old Baptists will actually contend that Jesus imposes these humiliating church ordinances and Christian duties upon his disciples, to humble them and kill them to the love of their human pride, boastful devices and worldly aspirations ; and that in their trans- ition from nature to grace he makes them loathe them- selves on account of their human pride and unworthi- ness, because of the spirit of the flesh waging war upon the Spirit of Christ, in consequence of which the spirit of the flesh revolts at a compliance with his church ordi- nances and Christian duties. 218 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. If these Old Baptists could only prove that there were others of the disciples present besides the twelve apostles who engaged in feet washing with Jesus, they would most assuredly have a better showing for their practice. But you well know that they cannot do this ; neither can they show that there were females engaged in it with Jesus. Therefore we can deride them, by defying them to prove that there were any who participated in feet washing except Jesus and the twelve apostles, and that there was no command given for the continuance or preservation of feet washing as one of the duties of the church. But they will tell you that your idea of none participating except Jesus and the twelve apostles is strictly inferential. For in the example set by the Savior he expressly says that he commenced washing the disciples' feet, and does not say that he commenced washing the apostles' feet ; and that he finally approach- eel Peter, and that Peter was so humiliated with such an act of lowliness on the part of his Lord that he told him, " Thou shalt never wash my feet." But when the Sav- ior told him that if he did not wash him he could have no part with him, Peter being so enthused in the minis- try with the love of God in his heart, that rather than be excluded from the ministry and his apostleship, he cried out, "Not my feet only, but my hands and my head." And that in further proof of the practice having been transmitted to the church, and that males and females all participated in it, and that it was obligatory upon all the saints who are in the fellowship of the SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 219 church, they will refer you to the following Scriptures, where the widow's age and aptness to do the things per- taining to godliness, are to be considered before she can be recognized as one of the counselors of Christ's church ; but the younger widows are exempt from the council of the church officers, although they may be members in good standing. "But the younger widows refuse; for when they have begun to wax wanton against Christ, they will marry." — I Tim. v. 11. And that sisters who have husbands, are to be governed by their husbands, and their husband's voice is to be heard in the church's council, and they are to learn of their husbands at home. " And if they will learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home ; for it is a shame for women to speak in the church." — I Cor. xiv. 35. And that the widow who is presumed to be of sufficient firmness to belong to the council, must be threescore years old, and at that age she would not be apt to reject the ordinances and duties of Christ's church, to partake of the superfluities of the world. "Let not a widow be taken into the number under threescore years old, having been the wife of one man ; well reported of for good works ; if she have brought up children, if she have lodged strangers, if she have washed the saints' feets, if she have relieved the afflicted, if she have diligently followed every good work."— I Tim. v. 9, 10. Now, sirs, they claim that the above quotation of itself is sufficient testimony to prove that all the saints, both male and female, are positively under obligations 220 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. as followers of Christ to engage in feet washing, when ordered by the church of their membership. And that there is no denying the fact, without openly declaring your infidelity as non-believers of the Word of God. Then in confirmation of all the facts that they claim to have proven, they will assert to you that there is not an instance upon record, where the original disciples re- fused to obey every ordinance and Christian duty as pre- scribed by Jesus Christ or any of his authorized apostles ; but in every instance, when the command was given, the disciples obeyed, without adding to or taking from. And that they, as the genuine disciples of Jesus Christ, are to-day under the same restrictions as were the dis- ciples of old, and dare not transcend the limits of their Lord by affiliating with any of the auxiliaries and inven- tions of men, as instituted by the various orders of my missionaries. • • For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book. And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and ou of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book." — Rev. xxii. 18, 19. Red & Co.— Our Lord and our God ! Our whole hu- man organisms are made to quake with fear and trem- bling, and our teeth are made to gnash within our months, when we are led to think that peradventure SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. N 221 these Scriptures may be true, as quoted in the last chap- ter of Eevelation. For we know, Lord, that we have added many new inventions, and have feigfted to take from the words of the prophecies of the Bible many of the ordinances and duties, that are left upon record by Jesus Christ and his apostles as the ordinances and duties of the church. And we have most assuredly, God, presumed upon the ignorance of Jesus Christ in these additions and diminutions of his holy commands, and we have feigned to believe that there were many of the institutions and inventions of men that would foster to the salvation of souls, and have added these institu- tions and commandments of men to our church organi- zations, and have regarded them as auxiliaries in the accomplishment of the designs of the gospel, which things we must acknowledge that we have added, to accommodate our convenience and pride, thinking that there would be no harm in a small digression, if our mo- tives were pure. But in this quotation we are positively forbidden to make any of these digressions ; for the God of these Old Baptists has said, that if we take from or add to the things that are written in the Bible, He would take from us our part of the book of life, and out of the holy city. But if these Old Baptists are correct in rendering the true meaning of these verses, we are much relieved in our feelings ; because we have always believed that these verses positively taught apostasy, and that the whole human family had a special interest in the blood of the 2'2*2 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. Lamb, if they would only avail themselves of the means of an offered salvation ; and that if they did not, God would take away their part out of the Lamb's book of life, because they refused to obey the commands of God, and be saved upon the broad platform of a universal atonement. But they render it very differently. They - claim that there is no one addressed in the New Testament except the church or believers, and that these verses are noth- ing more than a warning to the people of God ; and that if members of the church should amalgamate or affiliate with any of the devices or institutions of the world, the Word of God would take their names from the church book, and put them out of the holy city (church), and that it has no allusion to the Lamb's book of life. And that for their disobedience the plagues written in the Bible should be added unto them, and that they should not be allowed any of the privileges of the church, but should be held in disrepute by the church, and made to live upon husks in a spiritual sense, while in this rebellion against the commands of their Lord. In proof of their correctness they will tell you that the 15th verse of the same chapter says, "For without are dogs, and sorcerers, and whoremongers, and murderers, and idolaters, and whosoever loveth and maketh a he;" warning the people of God to stay within the limits of their Lord, and not to become entangled with the devices and abominations of the world. And that the next two verses say, "I, Jesus, have sent mine angel to testify SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 223 uuto you these things in the churches." And that the angel did not testify to any except those in the churches. "And the Spirit and the bride say, Come. And let him that heareth say, Come. And let him that is at hirst come. And whosoever will, let him take the water of life freely." Now, sir, they say that none are com- manded to come to the church or to Christ in these verses, except those to whom God had given the spirit and the desire to come, by quickening them into spirit- ual life, giving them that spiritual ear, spiritual eye and circumcised spiritual heart, causing them to thirst after righteousness, giving them the will to take the water of life 'freely. ''For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of His own good pleasure." — Phil. ii. 13. They further testify that Jerusalem is a type of this holy city (church), and claim to receive much comfort from the following Scriptures : "For I, saith the Lord, will be unto her a wall of fire round about, and will be the glory in the midst of her." — Zech. ii. 5. And that if Jerusalem is a type of the church, or holy city, and when Jerusalem was threatened that the God of heaven stood as a wall of fire around her margin, and His glory in her midst, that there would not be much probability of the enemy of souls robbing her of any of the ransomed or redeemed of the Lord. Old Zechariah further proclaims to the church, through the instruction of the angel of the Lord, "Ho, ho, come forth, and flee from the land of the north, saith the Lord : for I have spread you abroad as the four winds of 224 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. the heaven, saith the Lord. Deliver thyself, Zion, that dwellest with the daughter of Babylon." — Zech. ii. 6,7. Now, sir, these Old Baptists claim to have Christian fellowship for many who are members of our churches and institutions, and their ministers proclaim to us from the pulpit, with eloquence and arguments that are al- most equal to the angels that spoke to the prophets of old, and claim that God has spread them to the four winds of heaven, and that they inhabit every country and nation where God has a people. And in their ex- hortations they beg us to come out from the dwellings of the daughter of Babylon, and live with the true Israel of God, where we can he down in green and fertile pas- tures of salvation by grace, and find rest to our poor, thirsting souls, and thus evade "the plagues that are written in this book. " They will then repeat to us David's confidence in God's grace: "The Lord is my shepherd: I shall not want. He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: He leadeth me beside the still waters. He restoreth my soul : He leadeth mo in the paths of righteousness for His name's sake. Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil : for thou art with me : thy rod and thy staff they comfort me. Thou pre- parest a table for me in the presence of mine enemies : Thou anointest my head with oil : my cup runneth over. Surely, goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life : and I will dwell in the house of the Lord SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 225 forever." — Ps. xxiii. They say that they can truthfully apply the language of David to their own individual cases ; bearing further testimony with David before his conviction of sin, " Before I was afflicted I went astray ; but now have I kept thy word." — Ps. cxix. 67. And that your disciples treat them to-day as your disciples of old treated old D ( avid. " The proud have had me greatly in derision; yet have I not declined from Thy law." — Ps. cxix. 51. " The proud have forged a lie against me ; but I will keep Thy precepts with my whole heart." — Ps. cxix. 69. And that notwithstanding we have lied against them, and derided and mocked them, they are determined with the help of God not to violate any of the commandments and Christian ordinances of their Lord. These Old Baptists further claim that the inhabitants of this holy city constitute the bride or church of Jesus Christ, and that they are individually and collectively the lawful legatees of the inheritance of eternal life, and that they are heirs of God, and joint heirs with Jesus Christ, and cannot under legal or spiritual litigation be defrauded out of their rightful inheritance. They being bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh, and composing his body, having been given to him by his Father before the world was, and their names written in the Lamb's book of life, that they have a perfect right and title to the inheritance of eternal life as bequeathed to them by the Father ; and that the heirs of no other kingdom, nation or kindred, have any legal or spiritual right to 226 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. the inheritance bequeathed to the covenanted heirs of promise ; neither can the heirs of promise sell or give their inheritance to others. " No man can come to me except the Father which hath sent me draw him ; and I will raise him up at the last day." — John vi. 44. They say that Joseph's brethren sold him to the Midi- anites for twenty pieces of silver (Gen. xxxvii. 28), which sale was a type of the selling of Jesus to his enemies by Judas for thirty pieces of silver, which was only about half price for a man of his age under the laws of Moses, but exemplifies the theory of his enemies, who are preaching salvation half by grace, and the other half by works ; hence half the price of salvation must be reck- oned of works, and the other half must be reckoned of grace (see Lev. xxvii.); and that every type and sale of the Lord has ever been for selfish ends, and has ever termin- ated in the chagrin and humiliation of those who sold him, they not being able to make a bona fide title at the time of litigation, before the courts of heaven ; tried by the law of the King of kings, from whose decision there is no appeal. They further say that we are still selling Jesus to the enemies of the Old Baptists for different prices, ranging from one hundred to two thousand dol- lars per annum, in proportion to the ability or ingenuity of the salesman in getting a good price, but have ever failed to make a bona fide title 3 their patent or title not being given by the proper authority, duly authenticated and registered upon the parchments of the lawful heirs. And that our humiliation and disappointment will result SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 227 in the building up and comfort of the Old Baptists, as exemplified from the days of antiquity to the present. No one would presume to deny the benefits that Joseph's brethren received in selling him to the Midi- anites ; neither would any say that the true Israel of God were not benefited in the sale of their Lord ; for it behooved Jesus and Joseph to suffer for their brethren. Joseph the type, and Jesus the anti-type. " Thus it is written, and thus it behooved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day." — Luke xxiv. 46. Nevertheless, the wicked intent and crime committed by Judas and Joseph's brethren was not mitigated ; but the glorious and wonderful works of God were displayed in the temporal and eternal salvation of ■ national and spiritual Israel. "For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator. For a tes- tament is of force after men are. dead : otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth." — Heb. ix. 16, 17. They say that it is evident that a testator is any person of sound mind and lawful age who dies and leaves a will or testament at death, as to the disposal of his effects, and records it in a solemn, authentic in- strument in writing, and declares his will as to the dis- posal of his estate and effects after his death, together with the appointment of lawful executors to his will. Should a father die and fail to leave this written testa- ment, the laws of the land provide a testament for him, and in no case can the heirs of others lawfully claim any part of the inheritance ; but in all cases the parties speci- SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. fied in the will, or the lawful heirs of the deceased par- ents, are the only legatees. They contend that the heirs of promise, whom the Father gave the Son before the world began, whose names were all written in che Lamb's book of life ("I pray for them : I pray not for the world, but for them which thou hast given me : for they are thine. And all mine are thine, and thine are mine ; and I am glorified in them. n — John xvii. 9, 10. i. all fell in Adam, who was their federal head, and are therefore partakers of his sins. ' * Behold. I was shapen in iniquity ; and in sin did my mother conceive me." — Ps. li. 5. " And were by nature the children of wrath, even as others. But God who is rich in mercy, for His great love wherewith He loved us. even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved.*" — Eph. ii. 3, 4, 5. And that the sacrifice or death of their natural parents or federal head will not secure for them eternal life, but will only secure for them the inheritance bequeathed to them from the estate of their earthly parents. But that the Father in His wisdom, and for the great love wherewith He loved them, even when they were dead in sins, had covenanted with and pre- pared a donated sacrifice that was above the law, who by the will of the Father agreed to come under the law. to save or redeem them that the Father gave him, who were under the law. This donated sacrifice was compelled to be without sin. to satisfy the demands of the law. Therefore the sins of his people were imputed to this sin- less sacrifice, who knew no sin, and are remembered SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 220 against them no more forever. He being a donated and sinless sacrifice, did not release him from the terrors of the law : therefore the demands of the law that were against the heirs of promise for then- sins were compelled to be executed upon him. But he was not to be sold nor bought. But Judas transgressed the law. and sold him for thirty pieces of silver, which was the price of the bride, the Lamb's wife, as typified by the price of woman under the laws of Closes ; and that Judas did not seUhim for the price of a man of his age : for under the law of Moses he would have got fifty pieces of silver : hence, he sold the church and not the man. "And thy estimation shall be of the male from twenty years old even unto sixty years old : even thy estimation shall be fifty shekels of silver, after the shekel of the sanctuary. And if it be a female, then thy estimation shall be thirty shekels." — Lev. xxvii. 3. 1. But that the shedding of his blood was a propitiation for the sins of all that the Father gave him. Hence every heir of promise stands redeemed from un- der the curse of the law. and has a bona fide title to the inheritance of eternal life : all demands against said in- heritance having been eternally and forever liquidated by the blood of the Lamb, which was the everlasting- price of redemption. "The Spirit itself beareth wit- ness with our spirit, that we are the children of God. And if children, then heirs : heirs of G-od. and joint hems with Christ." — Rom. viii. 16, 17. "And if ye be Christ's. then are ye Abraham's seed and hens according to the promise." — Gal. iii. 29. "Wherefore thou art no more 230 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. a servant, but a son ; and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ. n — Gal. iv. 7. " Cast out the bondwoman and her son ; for the son of the bondwoman shall not be hen with the son of the free woman." — Gal. iv. 30. "Wherein God, willing more abundantly to show unto the heirs of promise the immutability of His counsel, confirmed it by an oath ; that by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to he, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us." — Heb. vi. 17, 18. But as the will of a testator cannot take effect until after his death, Jesus was compelled to die, to accom- plish the designs of his testament or tvill, so that the heirs of promise might inherit the estate and become the pos- sessors of the legacy bequeathed to them ; which legacy is the glory that he had with the Father before the world began. "And now, Father, glorify thou me with thine own self, with the glory which I had with thee be- fore the world was." — John xvii. 5. But he rose from the grave the third day, and became his own executor, and excuted the will of the Father, as he did in his primitive glory with the Father before the world began. And he became a conqueror over death, hell and the grave, for all that the Father gave him. "Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him that loved us.' -Rom. viii. 37. The will of the Father being the will of the Son and the will of the Son being the will of the heirs, and the heirs being in the Son, and the Son being in the Father, would make SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 23l such a vital and everlasting union between the Father, Son and heirs, that outside contestants would stand but a poor showing before the courts of heaven in setting aside the will or testament of the' Lord, and lawfully claiming any part of the inheritance. " My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me. And I give unto them eternal life ; and they shall never perish.; neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all ; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand. I and my Father are one." — John x. 27, 31. They further contend that the head represents Christ, and that the body represents the church ; and that a mother always dresses the body of her child because it is her child, and does not dress it to make it ' her child ; that she could not dress the child of any other with the same spirit of love and devotion that she cares for her own child ; and that Christ, the head, represents the wis- dom of the mother in dressing the body, the sympathy of Christ, the head, being with the body, or church, com- municating divine life to each member of this body at his own appointed time and in his own appointed way ; and that when this divine life is communicated to the last member of this body, or church, clothing them with divine inspiration, time will be no more ; and that the body of Christ (church) will then be in full fruition with the Father, in that everlasting compact that ex- isted with the Father and the Son before the world be- gan ; and that all the things of time, human reason, 232 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. sympathy and intellect, will all be buried in the grave, never again to be resurrected ; but that all the bodies of the saints will be resurrected and clothed with immor- tality on the great day of the resurrection. " And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God, and the books were opened : and another book was opened, which is the book of life : and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works. And the sea gave up the dead which were in it ; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them ; and they were judged every man accord- ing to their works. And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And whoso- ever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire." — Kev. xx. 12, 15. " So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corruption, it is raised in incorruption : it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory ; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power ; it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body. " — I Cor. xv. 42, 45. " So when this corruptible shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall have put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written, death is swallowed up in victory." — I Cor. xv. 54. They further teach that all the saints of God will be just like God, and will know God as God knows them, having God's wisdom, God's honor, God's features and God's glory, and that they will be in per- fect felicity with God in heaven forever and ever, all SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 233 their humanity, griefs, woes, sorrows, sympathies and sins having been left in the grave, where they were con- signed to their mother earth from whence they came. " ' Beloved, now are we the sons of God ; and it doth not yet appear what we shall be : but we know that when he shall appear we shall be like Him ; for we shall see Him as He is."— I John hi. 2. And if the saints in heaven are like God, and anything was to transpire that was averse to the will of the saints, or body of Christ, the same thing would be averse to the will of God ; and that the designs of God and the felicity of God and His people would be overthrown, and heaven would not be heaven ; for God Himself would not be happy, because His people would not be happy, and He and they are alike in heaven. In consequence of the above Scriptural arguments, they say that all of our grave -yard and death- bed stories, that excite the human sympathies of the silly, making them believe that there is natural love and affections in heaven, and that should they be fortunate enough to get there, that they would be grieved at the nonappearance of natural kindred and loved ones, and that natural heavenly recognition was a necessity in the completion of their eternal happiness, is all homespun and bosh. * • For wrath killeth the foolish man, and envy slayeth the silly one. I have seen the foolish taking root : but suddenly I cursed his habitation. His chil- dren are far from safety, and they are crushed in the gate, neither is there any to deliver them." — Job. v. 2, 4. ' ' Having a form of godliness, but denying the power 234 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. thereof : from such turn away. For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts, ever learn- ing, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth."— II Tim. hi. 5, 7. They further teach that in the testament or will of Jesus he never appointed any exe- cutors to his will, in the form of missionary boards, exe- cutive committees, financial committees, etc., whose duty it was to appoint ministers to certain fields of labor, and covenant with them as to the amount of labor to be performed, and the price to be paid for it, upon con- ditions that if the labor is performed the money will be paid, and if the work is not done the contract will be void, and the minister heavily censured or excommuni- cated from the ministry. They say that this is selling Jesus to the people, and making merchandise of the gospel of Christ. "And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you : whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not." — II Peter ii. 3. "And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence ; make not my Father's house a house of merchandise. And His disciples re- membered that it was written, The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up."— John ii. 16, 17. But that the apos- tles and disciples of Jesus went where the Spirit di- rected them, and preached the gospel to all the inhabitants of the then inhabited world, independent of the mis- sionary boards, committees and commissions of men, SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 235 and received the same persecutions that the Primitive Baptists do to-day ; yea, even worse ; for they were in- carcerated and beaten even unto death for contending for the same everlasting gospel, and denouncing the de- vices and doctrines of men, as do the Old Baptists to- day : but the apostles rejoiced "that they were counted worthy to suffer shame for His name." — Acts v. 41. But that the Old Baptist ministers are under no special obligations to serve a church or people, without they are moved by the Spirit to do so ; but f eeling that there is a great responsibility resting upon them to go and proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ to a dying world, that peradventure they may supply some poor, thirsting soul with spiritual food, and edify them in the things of the kingdom, and cause them to denounce the legisla- tive courts of Babylon, and accept the ecclesiastical courts of heaven, and enlist under the banner of Jesus, becoming identified and consecrated with the people of God. And that in doing this they follow the pattern of the apostles and disciples of old, taking God for surety ; believing that the same Spirit that admonishes them to go and preach, will stimulate the disciples and friends of the Christian religion to sustain them as they go, inde- pendent of all the moneyed machineries of Antichrist. Now, sir, you are certainly aware of having impressed one of the most lordly of our ministers, who was the presiding officer at our east Texas conference, in the city of Henderson, in the fall of 1882, to burlesque these Old Baptists, by relating a circumstance connected with 230 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. their history ; which circumstance they say has been common among them from the days of antiquity to the present, God leaving himself but one or two visible wit- nesses to testify in behalf of the great Redeemer of souls. Bishop Parker said, in one of his grandest appeals to the sympathies of a large and attentive audience, for money to support foreign missions, which missions had in the past converted and saved untold thousands of souls that otherwise would have been lost, adding num- erical strength to the church, whose combined influence and liberality had unclogged the wheels of Zion, and that Zion was then on the grand road to victory, adding strength, means and numbers to her already grand achievements ; and if the church would give to Zion their prayers, and open their purses to her ministers, giving them the means to procure a passport into every nook and corner of the inhabited globe, that the time would not be far distant when all the inhabitants of the earth would become moralized and Christianized under their benign influence, and the Christian millennium would soon be ushered in upon the inhabitants of the earth, and one grand hallelujah could be sent up from the earth's remotest bounds to the throne of God in heaven. He then related the circumstance that occurred among a very meager sect, known as the Anti-missionary Bap- tists, from a want of missionary aspirations. He stated that one of our missionaries was traveling and preaching to the destitute in one of the older states, and in route SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 237 passed through a densely populated community, the in- habitants being well educated, moralized and Christian- ized. In the midst of this community he passed a re- spectable church building and grave-yard ; the church- yard and grave-yard had grown up with a dense mass of weeds and brush, and the house was soiled from age and neglect, and to all human appearances was the home of the owls and the bats. Curiosity, combined with the love of God, led this man of God to inquire after the owners of this property, situated in such a beautiful grove, and surrounded by such elegant refinement ; and, behold, it was the property of the Anti-missionary Bap- tists, and its decay was the result of their anti-mission- ary heresy. He asked the neighbors what had become of them ; and the reply was that many of them had grown old and had died, and that their remains were beneath the brush and briars in the grave-yard ; others had moved away, and one only was left in this community to tell the tale of their demise. Now, sir, one or two of these Old Baptists happened to be present at this grand convocation of our ministers, and actually mocked the effort of our lovely bishop ; and when we would presume to mention his effort to them, hoping to hear a word of approbation, they would repulse us by reciting us to several circumstances mentioned in the Bible, where the God of heaven had left himself on several occasions with but one or two visible witnesses to testify for and proclaim the glad tidings of the great Redeemer of souls. 238 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. They would then call our attention to Noah, Lot, Elijah and many others of like precious faith ; but especially would they call our attention to the circum- stance of old Elijah, and Baal with his four hundred and fifty prophets. " And Eh j ah came unto all the people, and said, How long halt ye between two opinions ? If the Lord be God, follow him ; but if Baal, then follow him. And the people answered him not a word. Then said Elijah unto the people, I, even I only, remain a prophet of the Lord : but Baal's prophets are four hun- dred and fifty men." And the prophets of Baal accepted the proposition of Elijah to try their gods, and see who was God. " And they took the bullock which was given them, and they dressed it, and called on the name of Baal from morning even until noon, saying, 0, Baal, hear us. But there was no voice, nor any that an- sw ered. And they leaped upon the altar which was made. And it came to pass at noon that Elijah mocked them, and said, Cry aloud; for he is a god: either he is talking, or he is pursuing, or he is in a journey, or perad venture he sleepeth, and must be awaked. And they cried aloud, and cut themselves after their manner with knives and lancets, till the blood gushed out upon them." But that when old Elijah repaired the altar of the Lord, and put the sacrifice upon it, with twelve barrels of water on it and around it, and called all the people to- gether, he got down in a very humble way, as do these Old Baptists, and prayed the God of heaven, " Hear me, Lord, hear me, that this people may know that thou SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 239 art the Lord God. and that thou hast turned then heart back again. Then the fire of the Lord fell, and con- sumed the burnt sacrifice, and the wood, and the stones, and the dust, and licked up the water that was in the trench. " — I Kings xviii. They say that this bellowing, howling, crying, cutting themselves with knives and lancets, making a mighty appeal to Baal, begging their god to send down fire and consume then offering, typifies Bishop Parker, with his concourse of prophets ''mi ni sters), making a similar ap- peal to their god to accept then sacrifice and consume their offering. And that the principles of this poor. old. lonely Baptist whom Bishop Parker was trying to ridi- cule, is the anti-type of the principles of old Elijah, who only remained a prophet of the Lord ; and that the same spirit through all ages of the world has given God all the praise, honor and glory, and has humbled the true Israel of God in the dust of humility. And that this poor Old Baptist that was left alone among the prophets ('ministers ) of Antichrist is one of the anti- types of Elijah and the prophets of Baal, when they were testing the realities of their gods ; and that Baal's was a complete failure, while the God of old Elijah inspired him and told him to mock them, and tell them to cry louder, peradventure their god was asleep, or had gone on a journey. After which old Elijah humbled himself in a very quiet manner (as do the Old Baptists to-day when offering up then petitions to God), and asked his God to consume the offering ; and in the L'4" SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. midst of the people and prophets of Baal, and to their astonishment, the God of Elijah sent down fire and licked np the water and consumed the offering : and that in all probability this lonely Old Baptist was the Elijah of that refined community. They then propose to show us God's discriminating grace and favor toward national Israel in their delivery from Egyptian bondage, and the utter destruction of the armies of Egypt, who sought to continue them in slave- ry : and that both nations were the creatures of God. and that He favored the Egyptians with wrath and arro- gance, but finally destroyed them, and chastized the Israelites in slavery and degradation, but finally saved them, r * For whom the Lord loveth he ehasteneth. and irgeth every boh whom He reeeiveth." — Heb. xii And that old Pharaoh is a type of our god. and that we and our arminian cohorts are the anti-types of the armies of Egypt, under the auspices of Pharaoh, and that in our determination to force God to accept our good works, and save us upon principles of justice, and claim eternal salvation as a payment for our many good deeds, is the antitype of the iron will of Pharaoh to 1. afoe God to yield to the mandates of Pharaoh : but that God exemplified His power by sending miserable plagues upon Pharaoh, humiliating his proud and stubborn heart, until he was forced from circumstances to yield to the mandates of heaven and let the children of Israel but that (rod hardened his heart by withdrawing the plagues ; and that immediately, with all tl) SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 241 perated fury of a demon, he pursued them with his armies of avarice to his entire destruction, and to their deliverance as ordained or predetermined by God ; and that the same power that saved the Israelites, destroyed the proud Egyptians ; and that in like manner the same power that humiliates these Old Baptists with the chas- tening rod of poverty and derision, will ultimately de- stroy their proud arminian persecutors, whom God has blessed with the wealth and arrogance of Pharaoh ; and that their arguments, aided by the power and word of God, are as terrifying to our system of salvation as were the plagues that God sent upon old Pharaoh for his re- fusal to let the children of Israel go, as commanded by Moses under the direction of God. But that we are like old Pharaoh ; when the plagues are withdrawn, our hearts become hard again ; and when the devouring arguments are withdrawn for a season, we rise again in our own strength, as did Pharaoh, and bid the God of these Old Baptists defiance. "For He saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that run- neth, but of God that showeth mercy. For the Scrip- tures saith unto Pharaoh, even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might show my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth. Therefore hath He mercy on whom He will have mercy, and whom He will He hardeneth."-— Kom. ix. 15, 19, HZZ -T7 7->H Z~ Z~ I~ >♦ ~ zz " - — "--." - _:.-- ._•-_:-- —^ zl zi- zzztZz— - : ;zz - zz :z - -"--- :-;•- --- : . ■ --- -• zi: -- - 'si- z: :ir z-zz-z : zz~ z :z- z: "JL-7 — :zl: i~zz zzz-rZ - z - z "-' z_— - ^zT'zz-r- • ;- ~--~J Iz-z rz:> z z z ~-— - zz-- • :rzzL> z_ >z - • : • r:e:zz - ;.i " z^zzz > ; "_- - : -.-- ;:ir zz ';: zz : zz.zz And when vt ny to them that God is no re- z: zi - — ••_ ' - -•--: z zz-; zl - _ - ;-_.. --- : _, . : " - . --„..--- - _ - . ' - ' — - — — ■ •— - •--- - - - •■• • - - - — - -.-.-.-- zzz - •'_ z z :-;---: : -:-_.- ' :: zi r~-r zi": z -.- "z " :'-:zr-~z zzzz iz : ~~ ,:ir:.: :zz:- - :-:_ — z -.::>;.-rii -z Ezzz "— _Z z z. 4 Z I _- Zr" Si" " ■ -_ - :Z- . ZZZZ I . ZJ>~ :z_« ZZ I- ilr -z_ : ; zr. - 1 V:~ —z zzz z~ - - ' :■ £ri : -z_. 7 Li:z ' : izz i .— ._ Zr z_:z- - _ : ;zzv.i V— rrn _I~ z lr Zii:z,:?:z-^ zi-z ~,-z: :•;• :z-r - r -r_.-- '.-.::.--: - •: zj,.: -. :-z"- iz: z_- z.- ,-z:..-. I most bring, and they shall hear my voice; zz: "z-z-r zzzl - z-r : z. z: - -;_ -■; z-z ~— -z " ;-__-_ - z Tzz: :- : z-vzl -.•": z. : -;-zz --- '_- zz: iz :_ zzz ;:-. '.zzz'-r'':- . ' -Zz- Az: when AwMwag was sent to Soul by the Lotd to comfort - ■ . ;z- .--zz: z ;_-. :'z - z -zz-zzz t - zz- L. :•: -77? — told him that Saul ofTai cos. and that he pra yeSh. 171 ~ 177 It 777-1 11 ZZZ. ' ' z i~ '.—- _•: r*i -7-1 1 .tit : :z 7ri ~t---L 777 : t_t : llir- 77 1 7777- 77 1 171 5Ji;~ 7177 7 — 77-77 : '. 7" : I ;■ in -- 7.7 1 77. 1 1777 711 - : t ii -I "-oil ra^- : for he is a — zi .77 1 :i 7t 7:1:7.11 z- ~7i: 77 7171 111 :- 77 1 171 — I.i L- 1 17 :-" . •7-' . . . _ T 244 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. ion that removes the Eed Sea from their front, and en- ables them to stand still and see the salvation of God ; and then they march through their great sea of trouble to Jesus upon dry land, leaving the armies of Antichrist behind and in pursuit of them, to be swallowed up in the boisterous waters that God had opened for their escape. They then propose to try our system of salvation, based upon the combined efforts of man and the offered favors of God, and compare it with their system of sal- A^ation by grace alone, and the positive favors of God. They claim that the grace of God in their hearts will in- evitably produce acceptable good works, and that God works in all the saints. ' ' For it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of His good pleasure." — Phil. ii. 13. While good works will never produce the special favor of grace, neither can the Father be hired or bribed by the good works of carnal man to bestow the special favor of grace upon them, but that common favors will always follow the legitimate good works of the carnal mind. They say that in the days of Noah God made a pro- found test of salvation by grace, and salvation by our effort system, and that our effort system was an entire failure, while salvation by grace alone was a complete success. In the days of Noah the people became desperately wicked, and bid the ways of pod defiance ; " and it re- pented the Lord that He had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at His heart." — Gen. vi. 6. It is SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 245 not to be supposed here that His divinity repented, or that His divinity had a sympathetic fleshly heart, but that His humanity repented, and not His divinity. " Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning." — James i. 17. Therefore His divinity could not repent. The people in those days, as now, had sought out many inventions, that they might receive a part of the glory and honors of their own eternal salvation, by various systems and doctrines of men, to promote 'their own self- aggrandizement ; but the glory of the Father being the glory of the Son, and the glory of the Son being the glory of the Father, and every heir of promise being in the Son, and the Son in the Father, and for the great love that the Father had for the Son, and that the Son had for the church, the Father manifested His power and eternal purposes by sending a flood and destroying the world, thereby setting aside the abominations and doctrines of men; preserving his eternal promise and pur- poses with the heirs of promise to His Son, through the heirs of righteous Noah, thence to Abraham, thence to Isaac, thence to the coming of Christ, thence to all the nations of the earth, by the middle wall of partition be- ing broken down between nations ; since which time God has had an elect people among all nations, kindreds and tongues, "For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call." — Acts ii. 39. 246 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. " But Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord." — Gen. vi. 8. Noah being the only preacher of righteous- ness that was left to proclaim the glad tidings of sal- vation by grace alone, God preserved His church through him. " And spared not the old world, but saved Noah, the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly." — II Pet. ii. 5. And the Lord commanded Noah, ' * Make thee an ark of gopher wood : rooms shalt thou make in the ark, and shalt pitch it within and without with pitch," etc. — Gen. vi. 14. The Lord commanded him as to its precise di- mensions, its length, breadth, height, depth, rooms, doors, windows, and every minutiae was specially desig- nated. And Noah by faith did precisely as God com- manded him. " And Noah did according unto all that the Lord commanded him." — Gen. vii. 5. He did not transcend nor fall short of the limits of his Lord, but was willing to take God for surety, without conferring with any of the devices or institutions of men ; for " By faith Noah, being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house; by the which he condemned the world, and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith." — Heb. xi. 7. Now, sir, they tell us that the faith and God of old Noah is the same faith and God that these Old Baptists have to-day, and that they follow the commands of their God to-day with that same abiding faith that Noah, Lot, Abraham and all the old patriarchs did, without adding to or taking from, just as Noah did in building the ark ; SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 247 and that when the ark was complete, Noah did not have to go himself nor send ont missionaries to bring in the promised inhabitants of the ark, but that God sent them in by pairs and by sevens, both male and female, of all the animals, fowls and creeping things of the earth ; and that Noah was not required to even shut the door ; he was so free from an agency in their salvation and pre- servation. " And they went in unto Noah into the ark, two and two of all flesh, wherein is the breath of life. And they that went in, went in male and female of all flesh, as God had commanded him ; and the Lord shut him in."— Gen. vii. 15, 16. Now, sir, this is what these Old Baptists call salvation by grace alone ; this is what they call the unadulterated Christian's faith, that humbles them, and makes them willing to bear all the persecutions and derisions of Anti- christ, for Christ's sake ; and that this is one of the many examples of abiding faith in God by the primitive Chris- tians ; and that God is the same God to-day that He was then ; and that genuine Christians have the same special favors of salvation by grace, and faith in the sufficiency of God to do all His pleasure to-day, as He had in the primitive days, "with whom is no variableness, neither shadow of turning." And that their God is a God of purpose, and does not do things at random, but does all things after the eternal purpose of His will. " Declar- ing the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done, saying, My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure." — Is. xlvi. 10. 24 S SUPPOSED ESTER VIEW. They will then take up our combination of salvation by works and grace, and compare our present system of an offered salvation, upon conditions that we do many good works to secure the special favors of God's grace, and harmonize it with the effort system of the willwor- shipers or ungodly Pharisees, who mocked old Noah at the time of the building of his ark : and that the same spirit that counseled the Pharisees of old to mock old Noah for following the precise commands of his Lord, stimulates us to mock these old Baptists to-day for do- ing just as Noah did when he refused to negotiate with any of the Pharisaical devices of men, but determined implicitly to obey the mandates of heaven, taking God for surety in all things. They say that when the ark was finished, and all the promised inhabitants were sent in by God, and God then shut them in, that they can then see in their mind's eye the dark clouds beginning to rise, the heavy peals of thunder, the vivid lightning flashing through the yielding ether, the dark and dismal forebodings that cover heaven's high ethereal dome, then the rain begins to fall in torrent floods from the heaven's shrouded skies ; with that they see large and horror stricken groups of willworshipers helping God to stop the mighty consternation with their prayers ; while Noah and all the inhabitants of the ark sit with perfect complacency in the ark, under the almighty protection of God's amazing grace. They then see the waters begin to rise in the small tributaries, thence to the larger streams. SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 249 thence the low grounds are covered, thence the margin of the hills are shrouded with the awful tragedy of God's indignation upon the people of Antichrist for then ungodly irreverence to the mandates of heaven ; they still see destruction pursuing them by the swelling waters reaching then 1 cottages and barns : their horses. camels, oxen, asses, and all then portable substance is then gathered together on the effort system : the horses and oxen are harnessed to cans and wagons, which are laden with commissaries and supplies, the camels are packed with other burdens of weight, and with one common consternation they ascend the hills for protec- tion : the waters finally push them from the hills, and they flee to the mountains. In ascending the highest peaks, they see the strength of the horses, oxen and camels failing with their drenched and heavy burdens : they see the teamsters exhausted from hunger and fatigue, and women and children behind pushing at the wheels, and crying at the astonishment and consterna- tion of God's wrath upon them. Finally they reach the loftiest peaks of the mountain, much of the debris and less valuable property being left behind them. But the scene of this awful catastrophe is not yet consummated. The waters float them off the highest peaks of the mountains ; and amidst all the crying, shrieks and lam- entations of dying men. women and children, who are expecting salvation upon the effort system, they are swept off into the mighty waters, some clinging to the floating pieces of furniture, carts and wagons, until all 250 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. are submerged into the mighty waters of the flood ; while Noah and his family are floating upon the boister- ous water in perfect complacency, under the protection of God's amazing mercy and grace. Now, Sir, they say that we wLllworshipers are equally zealous in our effort system, at our excitement meet- ings, popularly known as revivals, and especially when our revival is held in the midst of some inundation, conflagration, epidemic or contagion, thereby impeding the common pursuits of lif e, and hazarding the life and property of the inhabitants ; and that our religion has a much greater effect upon us under such circumstances than at any other season of the year ; and that when our good old effort Christians become cognizant of the impending danger that confronts them, and they see temporal and eternal destruction in the near future, their religion revives, and our popular effort system is at once called into requisition, as in the time of the flood. But that these Old Baptists, in the midst of all these excitements and disasters, are found complacently fol- lowing the examples of the patriarchs of old, and are by faith standing still, waiting for the salvation of the Lord. They further say that at the time of such excitements they see us gathering together in groups, and trying to help God save the people from the awful calamities that await them, thereby mocking God by asking him to change the decrees of heaven, by rearranging the course SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 251 and relationship of the astronomical bodies so that rains and pestilences may come to suit those more competent to judge of the times, seasons and pestilences than the Lord. And that when these troubles press us closer and closer, as the waters of the flood followed our spiritual ancestors, that we climb the hills higher and higher, until we reach the summit of excitement in our religious exercises ; and that when our teamsters, (min- isters,) fail to be able to roll the wheels of the loaded chariots of supplies {unconverted) to the supposed sum- mit of safety, they see the old fathers and mothers with their deluded offspring pushing at the wheels of their supposed chariots of Zion, crying at the top of their voices, upward and onward, " Amen, glory to God, help us, God, to save these sinners from the gulf of de- spair, for we know that the devil has greater power to engulf them in ruin than you have to save them with- out our help ; therefore, Lord, come down with thy help and might, and we will help you to save them ; for we know, Lord, that you are a willing God, and all that you need in their salvation is our assistance, which shall be rendered without stint ; and with your help, Lord, we will land them on the summit of safety, where the devil can never reach them, if they will only stay within the limits of our protection." But that they see the flood of endless destruction reaching the summit of our supposed safety upon the effort system, and enveloping the highest peaks of our retreat, submerging us, together with our floating idols. 252 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. to which we cling, until all is buried in the awful abyss of endless despair upon the effort system ; while those who have been killed, in their transition from nature to grace, to the boastful stratagems of salvation by works, are floating upon the all sufficiency of God's mercy and grace, and are by faith following the precepts and ex- amples of the patriarchs of old, and are found to be standing still in times of religious peril, and waiting for the salvation of the Lord. And if they are wrong, they say that they are conscientiously wrong, because they are perfectly resigned to the will and word of God, and are submissionists in a religious sense, having no power of their own, but are wholly dependent upon God for life and salvation ; neither do they propose to assist God by pushing at the wheels of Zion and throwing dust in the air ; indirectly asking God to take a back seat, and that they will carry on the work of soul saving ; and after they have accomplished the work of converting and saving many souls, then ask God in their petitions to bless the work and save their converts from apostasy ; thereby mocking God, as though He were in His dotage, and not able to do all His pleasure without the puny help of man with his feigned efforts to assist God in the salvation of sinners. They say that it is impossible for any candid Christian to gainsay the power and will of God, when the word of God declares that He works all things after the counsel of His own will. "In whom also we have obtained an inheritance, being predestinated according to the purpose SUPPOSED IXTEKYIEW. 253 of Him who worketh all things after the counsel of His own will." — Eph. i. 11. And that He works in His chosen people to will and to do of His own good pleasure, and that He works in no one else. " For it is God which worketh in you, both to will and to do of His good plea- sure.'' — Phil. ii. 13. And that His people shall be a wil- ling people in the day of His power. " Thy people shall be willing in the day of Thy power." — Ps. ex. 3. And that the Old Baptists do not work for numbers nor for policy, so far as this world is concerned, but that they are actuated from a higher incentive than the accumu- lation of members to swell their treasury under the guise of God's insolvency, and hence inability to save souls without money ; but that they are ever zealous to keep the world out of the church, and thereby preserve peace, harmony, brotherly love and Christian fellowship among themselves. "Pure religion and undefiled be- fore God and the Father is this, to visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself un- spotted from the world." — James i. 27. Hence they are a peculiar people, zealous of good works. ■ ' Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works." — Tit. ii. 14. And that they have every confidence in God's ability to make all His chosen people a willing people in the day of His power, without any bulldozing or logrolling them into the church for policy's sake, upon the testimony of a fleshly experience and carnal repentance, actuated from human sympathy, 254 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. caused by the narration of some grave-yard or death-bed story, regardless of a godly sorrow for sin. They further say that we dishonor God when we limit His foreknowledge, and that His foreknowledge compre- hended all things that have or will exist, from the com- mencement to the end of time, in all their varied forms, latent, active, passive and positive ; and that His fore- knowledge is synonymous with His absolute predestina- tion of all things ; and that it would be impossible for God to foreknow any circumstance, action or substance, without predestinating it ; and that it would be wholly inconsistent for God to predestinate any circumstance, action or substance, without a foreknowledge of it ; and that the ingenuity of men and devils cannot invent any- thing that is new to Him ; and that He rules and con- trols all things to His own honor and glory, and makes the wrath of man to praise Him. " Surely the wrath of man shall praise Thee : the remainder of wrath shalt Thou restrain." — Ps. lxxvi. 10. And that when we are vaunting and throwing dust in the air, in helping God to save souls, and ridiculing the Old Baptists for not chiming in with us, we are making our wrath to praise God, in the establishment of His elect or chosen people ; and that all the murderous and blasphemous devices of those who make no religious pretenses, and the execu- tion and punishment of them before the courts, only serve to praise God, by disgusting His elect people and causing them to shun the appearance of evil. " Abstain from all appearance of evil. " — I Thes. v. 22. And that SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 255 when He has accomplished His designs in taaking the wrath of man to praise Him, He restrains the remainder of man's wrath by the penalties of the law, which is in hot pursuit of the evil doer. Therefore He is the creator and preserver of all things, both good and evil, and all for His own glory. " For by Him were all things created that are in heaven and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers : all things were created by Him, and for Him, and He is before all things, and by Him all things consist." — Col. i. 16, 17. Therefore the Father knew all things, and made known to His Son all things. " I and my Father are one." This being the case He certainly knew from all eternity who would be saved and who would be lost ; and in the covenant of grace between the Father and the Son before the world began, the Father either gave the Son a part of the human family, who should be the happy recipients of His Holy Spirit, or He gave him all of them ; and upon the theory of a universal atonement, the Universalists are correct ; for God cannot be disappointed. " All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out." — John vi. 37. We dare not say that any part or parcel whom the Father gave the Son will not come unto Him ; for the Father and the Son have emphatically said that they shall come. "My Father,, which gave them me, is greater than all ; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand." — John x. 29. And should we presume to say 256 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. that they can or cannot come, or that they can or cannot apostatize if they will upon their own volition, would be to give God the lie, which would be blasphemy ; for God says that they shall come, and that no man is able to pluck them out of His hand. The testimony of Paul says, " Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him that loved us. For I am persuaded that neither death, nor lif e, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord." — Eom. viii. 37, 38, 39. There- fore they say that their eternal salvation is positive, be- cause the God of heaven never does His work but one time, and that His first work has stood the test of ages, and will stand through all ages to come ; and that Jesus finished the salvation of all that the Father gave him, at the time of his crucifixion. "When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished : and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost." — John xix. 30. "I have glorified thee on the earth : I have finished the work which Thou gavest me to do." — John xvii. 4. " These words spake Jesus, and lifted up his eyes to heaven, and said, Father, the hour is come ; glorify thy Son, that thy Son also may glorify thee : as thou hast given him power over all flesh, that he should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given him." — John xvii. 1, 2. And that when divine life is communicated to those whom the Father gave the Son, this divine life SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 257 will never leave them, nor commit sin. "I give unto them eternal life, and they shall never perish." u We know that whosoever is born of God sinneth not : but he that is begotten of God keepeth himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not." — I John v. 18. Now, sir, these Old Baptists will positively ensnare us, by asking us similar questions to the following, and then exult over their victory : Do you admit the absolute foreknowledge of God in all things ? We are compelled to answer that we do. Do you agree that He chose His people in Christ be- fore the world began ? We are obliged to agree that He did, or deny the word of God. Do you admit that their names were all written in the Lamb's book of life before the world began ? The word of God emphatically says that they were, and we cannot deny it. Do you believe that there were any chosen who were out of Christ ? We cannot say that there were, because the Word of God says that they were all chosen in Christ. Do you believe that all who were chosen in Christ fell in Adam in his transgression % We certainly do. Do you believe that the spirits or souls of any who were not chosen in Christ fell in the transgression of Adam ? And if so, where and what did thev fall from ? 258 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. We are compelled to answer that we do not know. Is it not a fact that if God foreknew all things, they stood condemned in the eternal wisdom of God from all eternity, and that those whom he chose in Christ stood justified in the wisdom of God from all eternity ? We are compelled to answer that we do not know, or expose our cause, having already admitted that God foreknew all things, and cannot be disappointed. Do you know why God chooses one and leaves another? or makes choice and converts one member of a family, and does not another ? or converts and regenerates one man, and does not another ? We are compelled to answer that we do not know. Does He not choose the ones that 'were chosen in Christ before the world began, and not the others ? We can but say that it really seems so. Would it not conflict with the foreknowledge of God for Him to choose any others except those whom He foreknew and gave the Son, who were chosen in Christ before the world began ? We are compelled to say that it would. Well, then, does He not choose some, and leave others because He chose them in Christ before the world began, and did not choose the others ? It certainly looks that way. Well, then, does the Father choose them to make them His Son's, or does he choose them because they are His Son's, and were once in Christ, and by heirship be- SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 259 long to Christ, having been given to the Son by the Father before the world began ? We are compelled to answer in the affirmative. They then claim a grand victory over us, and refer us to Paul's letter to the Galatians. ' i And because ye are sons, God hath sent forth the Spirit of His Son into your hearts, crying, Abba, Father." — Gal. iv. 6. And they say that God did not quicken them into spiritual life to make them sons, because they stood sons in the wisdom of God before the world began ; and to redeem His obli- gation to His Son, He was compelled to quicken or bring to spiritual lif e all who fell in Adam, who by covenant and blood relationship belonged to the Son, or make void His contract, which would be impossible 'for God to do, as He cannot he. We then propound some questions to them, and ask them if those whom the Father did not give the Son, did not also fall in Adam \ And if so, from what did they fall, since they were never in Christ ? And they tell us that they fell from their natural state of innocency in Adam, just as the heirs of promise did, and in a natural sense became like the heirs of promise, all partaking of the transgression of their federal head, Adam, who by his disobedience to the command of God, brought himself and his entire posterity under the con- demnatory sentence of the law ; and that the difference is, that God, through the efficacy of the blood of His Son, redeemed those whom He gave the Son by contract, and did not redeem those whom He did not give the 260 SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. Son ; and that owing to this fact, God saves all alike in a time salvation, and bestows the same common favors upon the unjust as well as the just, all being His crea- tion, but not by redemption ; but that the salvation of those whom the Father did not give the Son terminates at the grave, while the ransomed of the Lord go on to the realms of eternal bliss and enjoy the full fruition of everlasting happiness with the Father in heaven ; hence Jesus died for the sins of the entire race of Adam, by living up to the exact requirements of the law ; and in a law sense all are the beneficiaries of His moral and tem- poral blessings, but especially did he shed his blood for those whom the Father gave him. Some of these Old Baptists have offered to hold an election with us, and let Jesus Christ and his apostles sit as the umpires, and decide who and which is the church of Christ by ballot. They say that they are no better than Samson was, and that Samson bet or wagered thirty sheets and thirty changes of garments with his enemies ; and that his ene- mies by fraud won the sheets and clothing ; and that they will bet us a fine suit of clothing, for the truth's sake, that the Old Baptists are elected by a large major- ity as being the church of Jesus Christ. But that they will not have any arbiters save Jesus Christ and his apostles, knowing that our corruption and greed for filthy lucre would swindle them out of the election, and hence the clothing, should they submit the vote to arbiters of our choosing. SUPPOSED INTERVIEW. 261 They propose to have two large tally sheets, and have the names of the popular denominations, together with the Old Baptists, written under each other as candidates are in holding elections for the officers of the law, and that ' c Affirmative " be written over the names on one of the sheets, and that "Negative" be written over the names on the other sheet. And that we then, in the presence of God, commence and read from the first of Matthew to the last of Revelation, and that when we come to a command, ordinance or duty, as prescribed by Jesus Christ or any of his authorized apostles, that we cast our eyes up and down the list of contestants, and make a tally mark at the end of each name on the "Affirmative" page, that complies with said commands, ordinances or duties. And then look up and down the "Negative" sheet, and make a tally mark at the end of each name who does not comply with said commands, ordinances and duties ; who also add many of the doc- trines and commandments of men that are not written, and that when the election is over, we then count the votes, and if the Old Baptists are not elected by an over- whelming majority they will readily pay the clothing ; yea, thirty suits of clothing ; for they say that they would divest themselves of all their substance for the truth's sake. And, sir, we have thus far declined their proposi- tion, knowing that we would be beaten ; but our pretext is that it would be sinful to gamble ; not but that we could gain the election, as we are wont to hold out the 363 SUPPOSED ESTER VIEW. idea to them, but we know that we would lose our notoriety and clothing. They then propose to criticise our innovations upon primitive doctrines, and say to our modern Missionary Baptist friends, who are trying to steal the name of Primitive Baptist, that they would like to know how the original articles of faith of the Baptists, from the days of the apostles up to the division of the Baptists, which occurred between the years A. D. 1830 and 1840, in the United States, will correspond with their present cherished salvation by the means of their Babylonish pet, the Sabbath school. And if the Primitive Baptists are not still in unison with the original articles of faith. They would like to know the age of our Sabbath school ; who was its founder, when it crossed the ocean, who taught the first one in the United States, and what was the result of its growth and teachings \ And if Harriet Beecher St owe and her brother Henry Ward Beecher. to- gether with Charles Sumner, and many others of like spiritual and political kin. did not write and circulate a book