x^^^^m^: .^W Cofu-d l/y George Southward. Helictype Priniius' Co., Boitoii. John Endecott, "GOVERNOR OF THE PLANTATION IN MASSACHUSETTS HAV," 1629. From a portrait in the Hall of the American Antiquarian Society, copied from the original ANTIQUARIAN PAPERS. MEMORIAL OF GOV. JOHN ENDECOTT; RECEPTION OF GOV. JOHN WINTHROP, At Salem, Junk 12, 1G30, A SEQUEL or THE MEMORIAL. PRESENTATION OF THE PORTRAIT OF PRESIDENT SALISBURY To THE American Antiquarian Socteiy, Oct. 21, 1878. EEMOVAL OF THE TOMB OF ISAIAH THOMAS, LL.D., foundku ov the american antiquarian sociiny, Junk 24, 1878. ^ W II C E S T E R : PRESS OF C II A S . '11 A M I L T O N . 1879. ./\5 WJTII THE RE8PECfiS OF From rrocecdings of the American Antiquarian Society, of October 21, 1873, and October 21, 1878. By Transfer MAR 30 1917 V 11 1 V A T E L Y r K 1 N T E D . CONTENTS. I'AGB. Mkmoiual of Governor John Endecott 3 Letter of Hon. William C. Endicott . • 3 Reception of Gov. John Wintiirop at Salem, June 12, 1630 . . 47 Eeport of Samuel A. Guekn, M.D., presenting Porirait OF President Salisrurv to the American Anti- quarian Society 55 EemarivS of Eev. Dr. Georgk E. Ellis 5(j Kemarks of Hon. George F. Hoar • 59 Response of President Salisbury 61 Removal of the Tomb of Isaiah Thomas, LL.D 65 Address of Hon. Charles B. Pratt, Mayor of Wor- cester 66 Address of Hon. Stephen Salisbury 69 Address op Hon. John D. Baldwin 74 Note ox concluding ceremonies 78 ILLUSTRATIONS. Portrait of Govkrnor John Endecott Frontispiece. PAGE. Portrait of Hon. Stephen Salisbury, President of the American Antiquarian Society . . • 54 M E M O 11 1 A L . Me. Salisbury, addressing the Society, said : It seems to me to be proper that the gift of tliis excellent portrait of Gov. Endecott should be received with more full consideration of its worth, than the brief notice of the Reports of the Council and the Librarian. It was accom- panied by the following letter from Judge Endicott : Salem, Oct. 16, 1873. Hon. Stephen Salisbury, -President of American Antiquarian Society, Worcester : Dear Sir: Two years ago, when visiting the building of the Society at Worcester, I saw a copy, or what was intended for a copy, of the portrait of John Endecott.* It struck me as so imperfect, and that it did such poor justice to the original, that I then resolved to give to the Society a good copy of tlie original picture. Circumstances have delayed the accomplishment of this purpose, but I have finally succeeded in obtaining a very excellent copy. I have sent it to Worcester, by express, directed to you, and desire that you present it to the American Antiquarian So- ciety, from me, to be pi-eserved in your collections, with your other historical portraits. It was painted by Mr. Southland, of Salem, from the original portrait, now in the possession of my fjither, William P. Endicott, of Salem. The original descended to him as the oldest son of the oldest son direct from the Governor, together with tlie sword with which the cross was cut from the King's colors, and a few other heirlooms. It was jlainted in 1665, *The Governor and his descendants, until 1724, spelt the name Endecott.— Memoir of John Endecott. the year of the Governor's death, and the tradition in the family declares it to have been a most admirable likeness. I do not know when tlie several copies in the Senate Cliamber, tlie Massa- chusetts Historical Society and the Essex Institute were made, but they all are more or less imperfect and inferior, and do not compare in fidelity and character with the picture sent to you. I assure you, my dear sir, I take a great interest in the Society and the good work it is doing, and with my best wishes for its continued gi'owth, and with the kindest personal regards for yourself, believe me. Very truly yours, WM. C. ENDICOTT. lu presenting this valuable acquisition for your inspection, I have placed by the side of it a portrait of Gov. Endecott that has hung on your walls for many years, and was re- ceived from the Rev. Dr. William Bentley, to wliom the Society is indebted for many treasures, in manuscript and print. The old portrait has compelled those, who would, admire its subject, to turn away and "see his \asage in his mind." This fine painting has the face, not of a cold and narrow bigot, but of a man who would view his object broadly and fearlessly in all its relations, and would not withhold the kindness of those pleasant eyes. We may now gaze on the lineaments and expression that are suited to one, who is described by Edward Johnson in his " Won- der- Working Providence" as "a fit instrument to begin this wilderness work, of courage bold, undaunted, yet sociable and of a cheerful spirit, loving or austere as occasion served."* His apprehension and his temper were quick, and his self-control was sometimes astonishing. In all his words and actions there was a constant and cheerful recognition of * Wonder- Working Providence, 19. religious duty. The personal beauty, which is here re- presented, has not been wanting in the ladies of his family in our own day. John Endecott was born in Dorchester, England, in 1588.* Governor Winthrop was born in the same year. I find nothing more in relation to the social position of Endecott in England than the facts that he was a brother-in-law of Roger Ludlow, and his first wife was Anna Gower, a cousin of Matthew Cradock. This wife died soon after his arrival in New England, and left no children. On 18th of August, 1630, sixty-seven days after the arrival of Governor Win- throp, Endecott was married by Governor Winthrop and Rev**. Mr. Wilson, to Elizabeth Gibson,! wdio was born in Cambridge, England, and probably came over with Gov- ernor Winthrop. She was the mother of twelve children. I do not know that there is any other evidence of the scho- lastic education of Governor Endecott than a few letters and ofiicial papers from his pen. These, with an independent vari- ety of spelling — the effect of changing fashion — and an entire disuse of any other language than the English, except in one instance, that I have observed, of the Latin word, "quaere,":}: are of a high character for clear statements and a choice of courteous expressions. His letter, dated Oct. 21, 1663, § written to persuade Rev**. Dr. John Owen, of England, to come to Boston, to take the place of Rev. John Norton, deceased, would do honor to any University. It does not appear that he was a lover of study, or of any book but the Bible, to which his allusions were frequent, and were made for strength of sentiment or argument rather than for orna- * Drake's Am. Diet, of Biography, t VViuthrop's New England, 1, 30. iMass. Hist. Soc. Coll., 4tli se., vol. G, p. 140. § Fell's Annals of Salem. ment or display. The memoir by Mr. C. M. Endicott men- tions that he was elected a member of the corporation of Harvard College, in 1642, when he was also Deputy Gov- ernor. He proved that he deserved this honoral)le distinc- tion, when on the 9th of May, 1655, he acted in behalf of the Corporation, with the concurrence of the Overseers, in addressing to the Geiaeral Court an eloquent and persuasive "information" of "the condition and necessities of the Col- lege and urgently prayed for aid; "if this work of the College be thought fit to be upheld and continued, as we hope that considerations of the glory of God, the honorable interest of the country, the good of posterity and the expe- rience of the benefits and blessings thereof, will constrain all men to say it is, then something must efifectually be done for help in the premises."* Rev^. Dr. Felt in his "Annals of Salem" quotes from the record of the Quarterly Court, that on March 30, 1641, "Col. Endecott raoued about the ffences and about a ffree skoole, and therefore wished a whole towne meeting about it ; therefore, that Goodman Auger warne a town meeting on the second day of the week." Dr. Felt remarks that "this is the first written intimation of instruction without price among our settlers." As evidence that "in the voluntary support of schools per- haps Boston led the way," Mr. Savage quotes from the Record of 1635, a vote "that our brother Philemon Por- mont shall be entreated to become schoolmaster, for the teachi-ng and nurturing of children with us."t But the merit of Col. Endecott's efibrts is not forfeited by want of priority. *Quiucy's Harvard College, 1, 464. t Winthrop's New England, 2, 204, u. Kev. Dr. Felt mentions that he found in the State Honse in Boston a bill in Mr. Endecott's handwriting, for the cure of a man committed to his care, in whicli he styles himself " Chirurgeon " ; and an early unstudied letter of his, with- out date, addressed to Governor Winthrop, when Mrs. Win- throp's health was a subject of anxiety, ofiters Unicorn's Horn, Syrup of Violet, and other rare and potent remedies, and adds, "if I knew how or in what way in this case to do her good I would with with all my heart, and would now have come to you, but I am altogether unskilful in these cases of women."* Mr. Endecott's training and prac- tice in the healing art were probably a part of a slight preparation for the exigencies of his residence in the wilder- ness. I do not discover that he had any other habitual occupation than the service of the colony ; to which he was devoted with equal zeal, as Governor, as Deputy Governor, as Assistant, as Sergeant-Major-General, and in other im- portant duties. To say that he served sixteen years, but not successively, as Governor, till his death, on March 15, 1665, and that he was for four years Deputy Governor, and for the same period Sergeant-Major-General, shows the high responsibility, but not the intensity and value of his labors. His frequent title of Captain, and his election to the offices of Colonel, Sergeant-Major-General, and member of the Military Committee, are evidences of his military reputation. His short campaign against the Pequod Indians in 1636 exposed him to censure. Judge John Davis calls it " an ill-conducted expedition, of which Plymouth and Connecti- cut complained that it only tended to irritate the Indians and to make tliem more insolent." He adds that "Johnson * Mass. His. Soc. Collections, 4th se., VI T., 156. calls it a 'bootless voyage,'" "tlioiigh its avowed object was death to all the male inhabitants of Block Island, and heavy contributions from the Peqnods."* It may be that Endecott, remembering Cradock's benevolent " Instructions,"! was one of those, who thought it would be better to convert some Indians before they killed any. He was not accused of want of courage or prudence, and Governor Winthrop indirectly commended him, in recording as a "marvelous providence," that they came all safe to Boston. As a planter he is remembered for his fruit trees, and particularly for a pear tree, set by him, on an estate now owned by a descendant, which in the present year bore a large crop. His excliange, in 1645, of 500 apple trees for 250 acres of land is recorded.^ The personal eminence and greater resources of Governor Winthrop have thrown into the shade the first administra- tion of Governor Endecott, in its weakness and sore perplex- ities. The historical memorials of Endecott are few and scattered. That part of the records of the Company that related to the sending liim and his companions, and the position in which he came, has not been preserved. The early letters of instruction to him, and his letters in return, showing how he understood and performed his duty, are lost. Tlie official records of the proceedings of his brief government, and his letters in explanation and defence of his measures, are so lost and forgotten that a doubt has arisen whether he ever held the office. He has been sej)a- rately commemorated only in the interesting and modest "memoir," prepared by Charles M. Endicott, Esq., a de- scendant of the seventh generation, and printed for the use * Winthrop's New England, I., 229-233. Morton's Memorial, 186. Hutchinson's Massachusetts, I., 00. t Archteologia Americana, 111., 84. J Mem. of John Endecott, by C. M. Endicott. 9 of liis family, in an edition so small that the book is not accessible to the public. Endecott did not, like his friend, leave evidence of his administrative ability and unsurpassed discretion, in an admirable journal of the public incidents of his time ; and in a large correspondence, carefully preserved, to be presented for the instruction of posterity, by filial reverence that comprehends his large views and sympa- thizes in his spirit. The standing of Mr. Endecott in history as a ruler and one whom Homer would describe as "a shepherd of the people," has been injured by the careless writhig of some of his contemporaries and best friends. They have conveyed the impression that he came to the Colony with the royal charter, not to establish and act under civil government, but to prepare for it ; a different and more humble duty. Mr. William Hubbard, the historian, who is supposed to be in- debted for information in a great degree, to his own neigh- bor, Roger Conant, and to Governor Winthrop, makes the same representation, with the addition that Mr. Endecott was the "new agent," as Mr. Conant had been the "agent before." He also states that Mr. John White, who, in his home in Dorchester, England, was truly the "Planter" of Massachusetts Bay, engaged the Treasurer of "the Joint Adventurers" to write to Mr. Conant to induce him to remain here, before Mr. Endecott was employed, and also to "'signify to Mr. Conant' that they had chosen him to be their Governor in that place and would commit to him the charge of all their affairs."* It has hence been inferred that Mr. Conant was as much a Governor as Mr. Endecott. * Hubbard's New England, lOG, 109. 10 Mr. Haven, the Librariun, and a member of the Conncil of our Society, has brouglit out the truth of this pas- sage of history in such condensed and lucid order, in the Third Volume of our Transactions, that it would be suffi- cient to refer to bis conclusions, if it were not desirable to ascertain the value and merit of the public service of these Fathers of Massachusetts, by a view of the more important incidents of their lives. Among many contributions, with which Mr. Haven has enriched this Society, there is none of greater interest and authority, than that account of the "Origin of the Company." Mr. Roger Conant was "a religious, sober and prudent gen- tleman," residing in Plymouth, about two years after 1623.* Charles Deane, LL.D., in his valuable notes to the edition of Bradford's History of Plymouth, which we owe to his per- sonal exertions, takes notice that Bradford does not men- tion Conant in that history .j On account of dislike of the principles of rigid separation, Conant migrated from Ply- mouth to Nantasket, where he was connected with Lyford and Oldham, unlucky and disreputable companions. When this settlement was broken up, he, with Lyford and a part of the settlers, attempted a settlement at Cape Ann. There he received the encouragement of John White and the offer of the office of Governor, that has been mentioned, but I find no record that he ever exercised legal authority. From Cape Ann he removed with a part of the settlers to Naum- keag. There, in 1626 or 1627, Mr. John White wrote to him, "not so to desert the business," with Lyford and otliers, who were going to Virginia, and "faithfully promised" if ♦Hubbard's New England, 106 and 107. tMass. Hist. Soc. Coll., 4th se., III., 195. 11 Conant and Woodbury, Balch and Palfrej, known to be honest and prudent men, would remain, they should receive supplies, and a patent should be provided. This was agreed to ; but before tliey received any return according to their de- sires, the three "honest men" last mentioned began to recoil, on account of fear of the Indians and other inconveniences, and resolved to go to Virginia with Lyford. But Mr. Conant, "as one inspired by some superior instinct, though earnestly pressed to go, peremptorily declared his mind to wait the providence of God in that place where now they were, though all the rest should forsake him, not doubting, as he said, but if they departed, he should soon have more company. The other three observing his confident resolution, at last con- curred with him," and they sent to England for supplies. This was the great work of Conant, to preserve the nucleus of a settlement at Naumkeag, which Endecott and Winthrop enlarged into a Colony. In 1671 Mr. Conant, in a petition to the General Court for a grant of land, says, " I have been a planter in New England for forty years and up- wards, being one of the first, if not the very first, that resolved, and made good any settlement with my family in this colony, and I have been instrumental for the founding and carrying on the same ; and when in the infancy tliereof it was in great danger of being deserted, I was the means, through grace assisting me, to stop the flight of those few, who were here with me."* He also mentions that he "was the first that had a house in Salem." There were two other instances in which Mr. Conant exercised public authority, but in both he acted as a man and not as a ruler. The first * Young's Chron. of Massachusetts, 27, u. 12 occurred, as Mr. Deane points out, before Conanfs resi- dence at Cape Ann.* A quarrel arose at Cape Ann, about a fishing stand, between the residents and a company from Flymouth, under Capt. Standish, who woukl have led them on to blows and bloodshed, if Mr. Conant, and Mr. Pierce, Captain of the May Flower, being present, had not interposed "with prudence and moderation," and removed the cause of disagreement.! Hubbard also mentions that Mr. Conant acted as peacemaker in a controversy between the older residents and tlie men who came with Endecott to Naumkeag, which in consequence of this, or after this, was called Salem, the city of peace. I do not know that there is any record, that on this or any other occasion Mr. Conant had any ofiicial inter- course with Mr. Endecott. The quiet retirement, in which Mr. Conant lived after the arrival of Endecott to the end of his long life, gives probability to the remark of Dr. Young, that "Conant and his associates, as was natural, appear to have been jealous of the new comers who had ar- rived with Endecott, and probably did not like it that their authority was to be superseded by his government, and their plantation absorbed by his colony. The Massachusetts Company seem to have treated the old planters with great consideration and kindness."^ Though Mr. Conant was well known and respected, he is not mentioned by Governor Winthrop in his Journal, and I do not find that in the last 49 years of his life, he held any public office but that of Delegate from Salem to the General Court in 1634, and, in 1637, the office of a Justice of the Quarterly Court. His life extended from 1591 to 1679.§ *Mass. His. Soo. Coll.. 4th se., ITT., 195, n. tllubbard's New Englind, 110-111 . t Young's Chron. Massachusetts, p. 145, n. ^ Geneal. Register, 2, 233. 329. 13 The desire to establish a Puritan Colony, that induced the "Joint Adventurers" at Dorchester, England, to attempt to support the plantation of Mr. Conant, was entertained by stronger men with more systematic arrangements, in Lon- don. In the Planter's Plea, we read that "enquiry was made whether any would be willing to engage their persons in the voyage ; and it fell out that among others, they lighted at last on Master Endecott, a man well known to divers persons of good note, who manifested mucli willing- ness to accept the oifer as soon as it was tendered."* Hereupon divers persons subscribed "a reasonable sum of money." On the 19tli of March, 1628, Johii Endecott joined with five other "religious persons," Sir Henry Ros- well. Sir John Young, Thomas Southcoat, John Humphrey and Simon Whetcomb, in purchasing "a patent" of the terri- tory of Massachusetts Bay from "the Corporation styled the Council established at Plymouth, in the County of Devon, for the planting, ruling and governing of New England in America."! Without delay, a companj^ of the patentees and their associates was organized by the election of Matthew Cradock, a merchant of wealth, lilierality, and influence, as the Governor, with a Deputy Governor and a Council of Assistants of the same character and standing. On the 20th of June, 1628,:}: three months after the purchase of the patent, John Endecott sailed with about one hundred follow- ers, and arrived at Naumkeag on the 6th of September. No part of the records of the company, in relation to send- ing Endecott, is preserved, except an order to pay the passage^ of him and his family after his arrival was known, on Feb. *Phinter'M Plea in Chron. Massachusetts, p. 13. t Hutchinson's Massachusetts. J Archaiologia Americana, III.. 3. u 13, 1629.* But a letter from Mattliew Cradock to Capt. Endecott, dated Feb. 16, 1629, incidentally furnishes all the information that is necessary. Tlie letter is partly private and partly in behalf of the company. It acknowledges letters of "large advise" dated 13tli of Sept. last, for which hearty thanks are given. These letters, and a letter from Mr. Cradock mentioned witli date of Nov. last, have not been found. Mr. Cradock speaks of the increase of the company, promises supplies, and asks for return cargoes ; says we are confident of your best endeavors for the general good, and trust you will not be unmindful of the main end of the plantation, and keep a watchful eye over your own people, and endeavor to bring the Indians to the knowledge of the gospel ; he commends his prudence in giving our countrymen content in the point of planting tobacco for the present, but trusts that other means more comfortable and profitable may be found ; he warns him to be cautious and distrustful towards the Indians, and informs him it is fully resolved to send over at least two ministers ; but does not promise the office of Governor or any increase of official power, nor does he recognize or allude to any other au- thority in Capt. Endecott than that wliich belongs to a wise and good num, who is respected as the Father of his people. It is passing strange that no allusion is made to the expecta- tion of a royal charter, with full powers of civil government for the company, in this letter, dated sixteen days before March 4, 1629, the date of the charter. The charter recites the names of John Endecott and the other purchasers, at whose "humble suit and petition" it was gran ted. f On the * Arcbaeologia Ainericaua, TIL 8. t Hutchinson's Papers, p. 1. 15 30th of April, 1629, an order of "the General Court at Lon- don" states that Capt. Endecott had been chosen by the Company to be Governor of the Plantation in Massachusetts Bay "for one whole year, or until such time as this coukt SHALL SEE FIT TO MAKE CHOICE OF ANT OTHER TO SUCCEED IN HIS PLACE." A deputy Governor and a council of Assistants were elected witli the same term of office ; and official oaths were required by the Charter before they undertook the exe- cution of tlie several offices. Persons were specially assigned to administer the oath to the Governor. I cannot ascertain the date of tlie election of Governor Endecott. A letter of instructions from tlie Governor and Deputy Governor of the company to him and his council, dated April IT, mentions the election as a past transaction, forwards to him a '"'■du- 2)licate'''' of the "Letters Patent under the Broad. Seal," as the charter was called, offers expressions of strong confi- dence, and gives much good advice. This, and a second letter from the same source and for the same purpose, dated May 28, have been justly admired as able statements of the views and intentions of the men by whom the settlement was projected. The Planter's Plea says, " The often agitation of this affiiir in sundry parts of this kingdom, the good report of Gov. Endecott's government, and the increase of the colony, began to awaken the spirits of some persons of competent estates not formerly engaged."* Thus Sir Richard Saltonstall, Thomas Dudley, William Vassal, John Winthrop, and eight other gentlemen of estate, intelligence, and respectability, were led to unite in an agreement, signed by them on the 29th of August, 1629, binding themselves to embark for * Young's Chron. of Massachusetts, p. 14. 16 New England, "to inhabit and continue there," provided that "the whole government, togetlier with the patent, sliall 1)6 legally transferred and established, to remain " with them and others who shall inhabit said plantation.* Such an undertaking must have required consideration and consulta- tion for some time previous. The negotiations connected with it could not liave been secret, and they must have been made known to Governor Endecott in the first months of liis official power, and he must have seen, that it was not likely that his hand could retain the sceptre which lie had made worth possessing. He nobly endured this trial of his char- acter. Though he suffered many reproaches in his active, earnest life, he was never accused of envy, jealousy, or dis- content, on account of his being superseded by Mr. Win- throp. And more than this — as you will presently be re- minded — in this time of uncertainty and inevitable anxiety, he carried through a difficult measure of great consequence to the character and the permanence of the Colony, and to the relief of him who should be its Governor. At a General Court of the Company, in London, on Oct. 20, 1629, Governor Cradock "acquainted those present that the especial occasion of this Court was the election of a new Governor, Deputy and Assistants, the government being to be transferred into New England, according to the former order and resolution of tlie Company."! An election was then made, of John Winthrop as Governor, and John Hum- phrey as Deputy Governor, and 18 Assistants, including Matthew Cradock and John Endecott. As a mere outline of the official service of the first rulers of Massachusetts cannot be truly presented, if the Patent and its transfer be * Hutchinson's Papers, pp. 25-26. f Archaeologia Americana, 111., 61-62. 17 left out of new, I will ask your patience for a brief consid- eration of them. On these important subjects our modern histories give large and able discussions, with opposite conclusions. James Grahame, LL.D., in his interesting and favoralde picture of all things affecting the character of America, offers as "tlie only rational solution of the doubts and difficulties " that arise in relation to the transfer of the Patent and the religious independence of the Colony, the hypothesis that "the King was exceedingly desirous to rid the realm of the puritans, and had unequivocally signified to them that if they would bestow their presence on another part of his dominions, and employ their energies in sub- duing the deserts of America, instead of disturbing his operations on the churches in England, they should have permission to arrange their internal constitution, whether civil or ecclesiastical, according to their own discretion."* As a lawyer, learned in the accepted principles of his own day, Mr. Grahame could not tolerate a transfer of the charter by the Company ; but he might have looked above royal favor, to the Providential order of affairs and events in England, which gave to the Colonists opportu- nity, encouragement and strength, for peaceable changes in government and religion, that the boldest revolutionist would not have dared to attempt ; and our copious and brilliant historian, George Bancroft, LL.D., with equal confidence, and the support of one of the ablest jurists of our country, Justice Joseph Story, maintains that the charter was "far from conceding to the Patentees the privilege of freedom of *Graliame's United States. I., 258-9. 18 worsliip ; not a line alludes to such a purpose. Tlie orais- Bion of an express guarantee left religions liberty unprovided for and unprotected."* An opinion of Justice Story, that the propriety of the vote to transfer the government and patent, "in a judicial point of view cannot be sustained," seems not to have been adopted by Mr. Bancroft. He says, the vote was simply a decision of the question, where the future meetings of the Company should be held. "The Corporation migrated- They crould call a leg:al meeting at London, or on board ship in an English harbor ; and why not in the port of Salem, as well as in the Isle of Wight ; in a cabin or under a tree at Charlestown, as well as at the house of Goff, in London?" "Whatever may be thought of the legality of the decision, it gave to Massachusetts a present government." This decision was no rash and unconsidered act. Mr. Bancroft mentions that the transfer was made "after serious debate," and an adjourned session, and the a(;tion of "a committee raised to take advice of learned counsel, whether the same could be legally done or no." This occurred in the time of Sir Edward Coke, when there was no lack of legal acuteness. It is the deliberate conclu- sion of Mr. Haven,t from which I think few will dissent after investigation, that the proceedings of the Colonists were "open and notorious, and sanctioned by the acquies- cence of the British government." The cotemporary his- tory abundantly shows the correctness of the opinion of Dr. Palfrey:}: and Mr. IIaven,§ that "a political purpose," or in * Bancroft's United States, I., 372, 383. Religious uniformity fared no better, t Archicologia Americana, III., 50. X I'alfVey'rt New England, 1. 308. also quotins Mr. Burke for the same opinion. § Uistory of Grants under the Great Council for New England, p. 25. 19 the words of Dr. Palfrey, "a probable purpose of a reno- vated England in America was entertained by the Puritan leaders, in view of the clouds that were gathering over their political prospects at home." "Those were not the times for such men as the Massachusetts patentees to ask what the King wished or expected, but rather how much free4pm could be maintained against him, by the letter of the law and other righteous means." Yet they were careful not to impair their strength, by losing the approbation and good will of the government and people of England.* Before Governor Winthrop had passed two years in giving organization and efficiency to his government, it became necessary to defend the charter and its privileges with an earnest struggle. The first foes were unwilling members of his own household, whose worthless settlements had been absorbed by the growing colony. Eubbard writes that "Sir Christopher Gardner, Thomas Morton, and Philip Rat- cliff, having been punished there for their misdemeanors — being set on, as was affirmed, by Sir Fernando Gorges, Capt. Mason and others, in 1632, complained and petitioned ao;ainst the Colonial Government."! A full hearino; was had by the King's council and reported to the King. The result * At a later period, the Earl of Clarendon, in framing his plan for the gov- ernment of the colonies by commi.-kioners, remarked that " they were already hardened into republics." That Charles II. imputed much of this hardening to the agency of Gov. Endecott, is apparent in a letter to Massachusetts Colony, written by Secretary Morice in l>chalf of the King, dated Feb. 25, 1G65; which concludes by stating that " his Majesty has too much reason to suspect that Mr. Endecott is not a person well affected to his Majesty's person or his govern- ment. His 3Iajesty will take it very well, if, at the next election, any other person of good reputation be chosen in his place." Before the next election Gov. Endecott died, but his successors were selected in view of the continuance of his policy.— Moore's Governors, 360; Hutchinson's f'apers, 392. t Hubbard's New Euglaud, 153. Neal's Puritans. 20 was, that the King "said he would have them severely pun- ished, who did abnse his Governor and Plantation, and that the defendants were dismissed with a favorable order for their encouragement, being assured by some of the Council^ that his Majesty did not intend to impose the ceremonies of the^church of England upon them, for it was considered that it was the freedom from such things tliat made people come over to them."* This gracious encouragement may have been falsely reported, and at best it must be considered to be of little value. But the fact remains that, at this period of immaturity and weakness, these powerful enemies did not direct their attack against the charter or its transfer. In 1636 or 1637, a writ of Quo Warranto was brought against the Company by Sir John Banks, Attorney Greneral, which sets forth that the members of "said Company in New England, for three years last past and more, used in London and other places, as also in several parts beyond the seas, out of this kingdom of England, without any warrant or royal grant, the liberties, privileges and franchises following," tfecf And in the specifications it is not alleged that the action of the Company is more unwarranted beyond the seas than in England. And in 1684 "the exemplification of the judg- ment" by which the charter was vacated, specifies three causes, levying taxes, coining money, and administering oaths of allegiance to the colony ; and does not name the transfer of the charter as one of the causes.:}: In the long interval be- tween the bringing a writ of Quo "Warranto, in 1637, to the judgment in 1684, " the clouds gathering over the politics of England," to which Dr. Palfrey alludes, were a blessing of * Mr. Grahamo has much reliance on this incident. t Hutchinson's I'apers, 101. JMass. Hist. So«. Collections, 4th se., II., 24G. 21 Providence to protect and nonrisli the growtli of political independence and freedom from the Church of England (witli a tendency to larger liberty) in the Colonies, which would have been trampled out, if the career of the English monarchy had been prosperous. In tlie absence of letters and records relating to the action of Mr. Endecott as Agent and as Governor, I can offer but a brief account of it, under three heads. First, he could do nothing better than to draw together the eight or ten little heterogeneous settlements in the Bay, and teach them that it was tlieir interest to be united. This must be done with meekness of wisdom, without a display of authority that might create alarm, and therefore it was less exposed to historical notice. I can specify no measure for this object but an exploration of the country west, mentioned by Governor Hutchinson.* I do not perceive that any worlv of this sort required the attention of Governor Winthrop. Second, the statement of the Planter's Plea, and other histories, that the good report of Captain Endecott's government and the increase of the colony induced a larger number of good men to come over, is evidence of the greatest weight and signifi- cance. Third, the expulsion of Messrs. John Brown and Samuel Brown from the Colony, in August, 1629, proves that he acted as a legal and a wise governor. The full account of tliis incident is found only in Nathaniel Morton's Memorial, (chiefly .of Plymouth), though it is confirmed by the records and documents of Massachusetts. Mi-. Morton wrote from information received from his uncle, Governor William Bradford of Plymouth,! and from manuscripts left * Hutchinson's Massachusetts, I., p. 17. t Morton's Memorial, pp. 147-8. 22 in his study. John Brown and Samuel Brown were men of respected character and great social influence, and after this time they were members of Parliament. They came over at the same time as the charter, and they are named among the five persons authorized to administer the oath of ofiice to Governor Endecott, and they were members of his coun- cil.* They resided in Salem, where they, and other passen- gers recently arrived, observing that the Book of Common Prayer and the ceremonies of the Englisli Church were not used, began to raise some trouble. They gatliered a com- pany together, in a place distant from the public assembly, and there the Book of Common Pra^^er was used. " The Governor, Mr. Endecott, taking notice of the disturbance that began to grow among the people by this means, he convented the two brothers before him. They ac- cused the ministers, as departing from the orders of the church of England, that they would be Separatists and Anabaptists, &c., but for themselves they would hold to the orders of the Church of England. The ministers answered for themselves ; they were neither Separatists nor Anabaptists ; they did not separate from the Church of England, but only from the corruption and disorders there ; and that they came away from the Common Prayer and ceremonies, and had suifered much for their non-conformity in their native land, and, therefore, being in a place where they might have their liberty, they neither could nor would use them, because they judged the imposition of these tilings to be sinful corruptions in the worship of God. The Gov- ernor AND Council and tlie generality of the people did * An honorary introduction of them by the London Company to Gov. Ende- cott, is added to the *• Instructions," which are the frame of the new govern- ment. These circumstiinces are mentioned to show the position and power of the two brothers. 23 well approve of the ministers' answer ; and, therefore, find- ing these two brothers to be of high spirits and their speeches and practices tending to mutiny and faction^ the Governor told them that JSTew England was no place for such as they ; and, therefore, sent them both back for England at the return of the ships the same year. And though they breathed out threatenings both against the Governor and ministers there, the Lord so disposed of all, that there was no further inconvenience followed upon it."* "On the 16th of October, 1629, Mr. Cradock, Governor of the Company in London, and the members of his Council, including Mr. Winthrop, addressed and individually signed separate letters to the two ministers, Messrs. Skelton and Higginson, and to Governor Endecott, in relation to the rumors of scandalous and intemperate speeches by the ministers, and of rash innovations in civil and ecclesiastical government, circulated by the Messrs. Brown, who had recently arrived. Tlie letter to the ministers expresses a strong hope that the accusations are untrue, and urges them to clear themselves or expect that order will be taken "for the redress thereof." To Governor Endecott they write that "we do well consider that the Browns ai'e likely to make the worst of anything they have observed in New England, by reason of your sending them back against their wills for their offensive behavior, expressed in a general letter from the company there.! Yet for that we likewise do consider tliat you are in a government newly founded and want that assistance which the weight of such a business doth require, we may have * Morton's N. E. Memorial, p. 147, et seq. t Archaiologia Amerinana, II T. pp. 53-54. This general ZeWer, probably from Endecott's Couucil, has not been found. 4 24 leave to think it is possible some undigested counsels have too suddenly been put on execution, which may have ill construction with the State here, and make us obnoxious to any adversary. Let it, therefore, seem good unto you to be very sparing in introducing any laws or commands which may render yourself or us distasteful to the State here, to which, as we ought, we must and will have an obsequious eye." And then follows a vague requirement, that if he knows any thing "to detract from God's glory or his majesty's honor that hath been spoken or done by the min- isters or any others," he should " send due process " against the offenders, that we may, as our duty binds us, use means to have them duly punished." The object of this last passage, and of the letters generally, was to ward off, by the offer of prompt justice, the ill will and hostility against the Colony which the Browns would soon stir up in the English government and people. These letters throw strong light on the standing of Endecott's government, not only by the expressions of respect and confidence, but still more by the absence of any intimation that this proceeding was not legal and authorized by the official " Instructions " which were a part of his appointment. The words are, " if any persons prove incorrigible, and will not l)e re- claimed by gentle correction, ship such persons home by the Lion's Whelp rather than keep [them] there to infect or be an occasion of scandal unto others ; we being per- suaded that if one or two be so reshipped back and certifi- cate sent home of their misdemeanor, it will be a terror to the rest, and a means to reduce them to good conform- ity."* The letters give no hint of a power or disposition to The " general letter" mentioned on page 23, was the " certificate" required. 25 overrule Governor Endecott's proceedings. In Chuliners's political Annals, page 146, we read "when the persons had arrived in England, they who had been thus ex- pelled naturally appealed to the Governor and Company for reparation of their wrongs, but it api)ears not from their Kecords, that they received any redress. The in- solence of contem])t was added to the injustice of power." It does appear from the Records of Sept. 19, 1629, that arbitrators to settle this claim were agreed on by the Browns and the Company, and Mr. Winthrop was one of them. And they were ordered to "determine and end the business on the first Tuesday of next term."* If this settle- ment had been made, it would have been a proper subject of the lost Colony records and not of the records of the Com- pany. K the settlement had not been made, the complaints of the Browns would not have ceased to appear in history. I regret that I could not present more briefly a historical in- cident that deserves full consideration for its legal character and its momentous consequences. It has been sufficiently ap- parent that the expulsion was not a spasmodic act of tyran- ny, but a regular authorized action of a Government legally established. As to the consequences, the question was pre- sented whether the church of the conformists, established by these gentlemen with so much promise at Salem, and sup- ported by the favor, wealth and power of its friends in England, should be permitted to disturb and overturn the place of refuge, which the Puritans had begun to prepare for themselves. If Governor Endecott and his Council and Colonists did not remember. Governor Bradford and Elder Brewster and the men of Plymouth, with wliom the}' were * ArchiEologia Americana, III., p. 50. 36 then in frequent consultation, would not allow them to forget that such conforaiists as these persecuted good John Robin- son, thwarted his strong purpose to come to Plymouth, and deprived his people of the comfort and guidance of their beloved pastor. If the Messrs. Brown and their friends had been suffered to go on in their enterprise, the Colony would have divided and perhaps broken up, and the worthy and desirable immigrants, who had recently come and all tlie best of the population would have sought more agreeable homes. Moreover, this victory of Governor Endecott made it less diificult to preserve the integi-ity of the Colony in future years. We may conjecture that the apprehension of the power of the Messrs. Brown induced a prompt consum- mation of the arrangement long since made, for the transfer of the whole government and charter and the election of Governor Winthrop. And the idea might have been enter- tained tliat it would be considered a concession if Governor Endecott should be superseded. It appears that the measure was carried into effect suddenly. At the Court of the Com- pany, held on Oct. 16, 1629, when the letters to the Gover- nor and ministers were signed, "it is conceived fit that Captain Endecott continue the government there unless just cause to the contrary."* At a court of the 20th of October, four days after, the transfer of the Government was voted and Governor Winthrop was elected to supersede Governor Endecott, who was chosen one of his Council of Assistants. It may be 'presumed that Governor Wintln-op had after- wards no trouble about the Messrs. Brown, for T do not find their names in liis journal. The personal relation of Governor Endecott to Governor * Aichaeologia Americana, III., p. 69. 27 Winthrop deserves particular notice. The unostentatious and unobserved relinquishment of office by Endecott seems to me to be a high-minded act that has not received the praise which it deserves. That it is not an easy performance in modern days is proved by unhappy examples of most emi- nent statesmen. But Governor Endecott betrayed no en\^ or disappointment. And I have not found any evidence of censure or disrespect at any time between these most promi- nent founders of Massachusetts. Mr. Endecott cordially welcomed Governor Winthrop on his arrival at Naumkeag, on June 12, 1630.* Governor Winthrop writes in his Jour- nal, "Mr. Endecott came to us with Mr. Skelton (the pastor), and Oapt. Lovett. We that were of the assistants, and some other gentlemen, and some of the women and our Captain returned with them to Naumkeag, where we supped with a good venison pasty and good beer." Another demonstra- tion of good will is indicated in the entry of August 18, 1630: "Capt. Endecott and Gibson were married by the Governor and Mr. Wilson." Tliat this friendly inter- course, so promptly begun, was continued during the life of Governor Winthrop, is proved by many letters from Ende- cott to Winthrop. They are expressed in the dignified con- fidence of friendship, with assurances of warm aftection, and with kind messages to Mrs. Winthrop. Though I can find no replies to these letters, it cannot be donbted that they existed. It would have been impossible that such expres- sions of personal regard should have been so repeated by such a man as Endecott, unless they were recipi'ocated. That the remaining letters of so good a scholar and so ready a writer as Governor Winthrop are so few, and the letters * Winthrop's New England, I., p. 30. 28 addressed to him are very numerous, must be imputed to the methodical habits of the Governor, and tlie carelessness of his correspondents. To show the character of Mr. Ende- cott's letters to his friend, I will offer two brief extracts. He writes under date of 2d of 12th month, 1639, on occasion of Governor Winthrop's loss, by misconduct of his bailiff in England, "If I should say I do not heartily and truly love you and yours, I should speak against my conscience ; yet I cannot satisfy myself with sole verbal expressions. Some- times I am thinking He [the Lord,] is upon the trial of your- self in the exercise of your faith, and patience, and other graces ; that as you have been beneficial and helpful all your time, since you came over, in the course he hath set you, now he will make you beneficial anotlier way to us all, in an exemplary, cheerful undergoing of God's afflicting hand in wisdom and patience." And his letter, dated March 5th, 1649, three weeks before Governor Winthrop's death, has this passage : "Good sir, let us labor to love [one] another, and harbor the best thoughts of one another. We have not long to live here in this life, yet we shall remain as long as our appointed times are set," and let us "labor for cheer- fulness of spirit. You know who hath commanded it."* The character of Capt. Endecott is beautifully transparent, in a letter addressed by him to Governor Winthrop, April 12, 1631, near the end of Winthrop's first year ; after stat- ing the cause of his non-attendance at a court as one of the assistants, and other things, he says : "Sir, I desired the rather to have been at Court, because I hear I am much complained on by goodman Dexter for striking him. I acknowledg3 I was too rash in striking him, understanding * Mass. Hist. Soc. Coll., 4tli se., VI., 13G and 150. 29 sinoe that it is not lawful for a Justice of the Peace to strike. But if you had seen the manner of his carriage, with such daring of me, with his arms on kimbo, &c. It would have prov^oked a very patient man. But I will write no more of it, but leave it till we speak before you face to face. Only thus far further, that he hath given out, if I had a pxtrse lie would make me empty it ; and if he cannot have justice here he will do wonders in England ; and if he cannot prevail there he will try it out with me here at blows. Sir, I desire that you will take all into consideration. If it were lawful to try it at blows, and he a fit man for me to deal with, you should not hear me complain. But I hope the Lord hath brought me off from that course ;" and the letter, after pro- posing "dismissing the Court," on account of planting sea- son, concludes in these words : " I will be with you, the Lord assisting me, as soon as conveniently I can. In the meanwhile, I commit you to his protection and safeguard, that never fails his children, and rest, your unfeigned, loving friend to command."* On the trial, the jury found Capt. En- dec^ott guilty, and assessed the damages at forty shillings (xls.). Governor Winthrop, prompted by his sense of honor, does not record, in his admirable journal, this misfortune of his friend, nor any scandal of the time, Mr. Savage mentions the case briefly in a note', and says "the verdict was £10 damages." This mistake must have been occasioned by a careless in- spection of the original (./olonial record, which, on examina- tion, is found to justify the 40 s. of the printed volume. The correction of this error is important, because so large an amount as ten pounds would indicate a gross outrage. * Hutchinson's Collection of Papers, 50. 30 Tliis Conrt was held May 3, 1631. On the preceding 30th of November, Sir Richard Saltonstall, whose name is always mentioned as the first in a list of assistants, was fined £5 "for wdiipping two several persons without the presence of another assistant." It was a frequent practice that members of the government should honor the laws by submitting to the penalties. Such proceedings would tend to promote a respect for law and order among our fathers which their chil- dren sometimes boast that they have inherited. Each of these two defendants sat as assistant in the court at the session when he was punished. On other occasions he was subjected to slight public censure, when he expressed too strongly by words and acts, the opinions that other leading men held in secret. With such a mind and temper, through his long life he retained a large share of the confidence and respect of his peculiar people ; and his cordial friendship witli that native nobleman. Governor Winthrop, was inter- rupted only by death. On November 19, 1632, a little more than two years after the active administration of Gov- ernor Winthrop began, Capt. Thomas Wiggin wrote to Sir John Coke, Under-Secretary, that "the English in New England, numbering about two thousand, and generally most industrious, have done more in three years than others in seven times that space, at one tenth of the expense." * Cotton Mather, in his Magnalia, says after the death of Thomas Dudley, (1653), "the notice and respect of the Colony fell chiefly on John Endecott, who, after many ser- vices done for the colony, even before it was a Colony, as well as when he saw it grow into a populous nation under his prudent and equal government, expired in a good old *Sainsbury's Calendar, 156. 31 age." And Hubbard seems to claim that his influence lived after him, by saying that after the death of Mr. Ende- cott (March 23, 1665,) "Mr. Belliugham was elected till his deatli by the general consent of the freemen, who, appre- hending the danger of some change, resolutely fixed their choice upon such persons, as they judged most likely to maintain the government in that same state, wherein it hath been heretofore, without the least alteration or change." Governor Endecott accepted with confidence, and main- tained the doctrines and practices of the Puritans. Gov- ernor Hutchinson speaks of him as "among the most zealous undertakers and most rigid in principles." But a modern notion, that he was more bigoted and severe than the other leading men of his time, is not^supported by history. He is not fairly treated, when he is selected for the contempt of posterity, because he acted with Deputy Governor Dudley, Sir Richard Saltonstall, and the other magistrates, in signing a paper which sets forth that "Forasmuch as the wearing of long hair, after the manner of ruflians and barbarous In- dians, has begun to invade New England, contrary to the rule of God's word, which says it is a shame for a man to wear long hair, as also the commendable custom generally of all the Godly of our nation until within these few years, we, the magistrates who have subscribed this paper, (for the showing of our own mnocency m this behalf), do declare and manifest our dislike and detestation against the wearing of such long hair, as a thing uncivil and unmanly, whereby men do deform themselves and oifend sober and modest men." " We do, therefore, earnestly entreat all the elders of this jurisdiction" to manifest their zeal against it, "and to take care that the members of their respective churches be 5 32 not defiled therewith," &c.* Governor Hutchinson, who preserves this document in his history, calls this move- ment "an association against long hair." As this paper, which is dated 3d month, 10th day, 1649, is said to be taken from "Harvard College records," it gives occasion for the conjecture that it was prepared to have a good influence on the college. The graceful locks, that relieve the hard outline of the philosophical cap of the Governor, show that he had no personal dislike of the ornament of hair. He is also reproached for aiding Roger Williams in requiring women to wear veils at church.f This was resisted successfully by the women, with the aid of Rev. Mr. Cotton. Governor Endecott showed a better spirit in his desire to save Mary Dyer, the Quaker or Antinomian, from a capital sentence, when he did violence to his own conscience by suggesting to her the denial of her identity and putting her accusers to the proof.:}: But she was too brave to adopt this defence, or to accept her life on condi- tion that she would leave the colony. It is necessary to speak as briefly as I can of the agency of Governor Endecott in the persecution for religious opin- ions. This persecution has been described as a black cloud on the character of the colonists, resting with its most bale- ful shade on Endecott, who oflicially represented the opin- ions, which he shared with the majority, including many of the wisest and best of the people, and which it was his duty to enforce by legal sanction. While no man can defend those cruel acts, no just man will overlook the extenuating * Hutchinson's Massachusetts. 1, 142. President Quincy and Mr. Benjamin Peirce in their histories of the college, take no notice of this paper. t Moore's Governors. 352. I Sewell's History of Quakers, 1, 394- 33 (circumstances under which those acts were done. The provocntions were great. The colonists had come to the wiklerness as a place of refuge, where they might enjoy their religious opinions and practices, without the disgrace and violence which they snifered in England. Before they were strong in union and a common interest. Anabaptists, Antinomians and Quakers came among them, in spite of prohibitions, with no apparent purpose but to stir up oppo- sition and strife. The Quakers, who were the most nu- merous, were not such cheerful, peacealde, thrifty and inde- pendent christian philosophers, as those who are now called by the same name. They and the other foes to the peace of the Puritans, were bold, aggressive disturbers of private society and public assemblies, and hostile to the influence of christian teachers and the authority of civil rulers. Among them were fierce railers, having no respect for decency, who created an odium against others of more gentle mood, asso- ciated with them in some of their opinions. Thus the amia- ble and misguided, under the influence of a mania for mar- tyrdom, in the confusion of the times, were made conspicu- ous victims. In these things the Puritans were not sinners above their contemporaries. The two folios of Besse's" Col- lection of the sufferings of the people called Quakers," give accounts of this inhumanity in Yirginia and in the American islands, in England, Germany, and other parts of Europe, and in Asia. It was a time when private and public disci- pline was rude and painful. Punishments, for ecclesiastical and political offences by barl>arous wounds on the person were frequent and were not followed by dishonor. William Prynne, the learned lawyer and antiquary, and indomitable Puritan, was sentenced, for writing against the church and 34 clinrclimen, to pay a large line, to be degraded from liis pro- fession, and to stand in tlie pillorj in two difierent places, and to have one ear cut off in each place, and his nose slit and his forehead branded, and to be perpetually imprisoned.* This sentence was rigorously executed in ISM.f He re- peated the offence and was again punished in 1637 by the pillory, by marks on his cheeks, and by the loss of the re- mainder of his ears. In 164rl he was a member of Parlia- ment and took the lead in the impeachment of Archbishop Laud. The "civnl sword" was considered a proper weapon of truth and righteousness for common use. Besse remarks that "the edge of these old [English] laws was now turned upon the Quakers, while the Papists, against whom they were originally made, were little molested.''^ The same author gives the names of twenty-five men and women in England, who, as Quakers, between 1650 and 1660, died in prison and in consequence of abuses. In the list for New England, in the same period, I do not find that any Quakers lost their lives for their opinions, but the four who were tried and executed according to the law. It is a sad and surprising evidence of the weakness of humanity, that the Puritans, honest and earnest men, could have the Bible constantly and reverently in their memories and on their lips, without obeying its lessons of kindness and forbear- ance. And the example and precept of the neighboring * Biographic Qenerale. t Pictorial Hist, of Enjfland, 3, loo. IGO. Immediately after, he wrote a ".-ting- itig letter" to Laud, and was again brought to the Star Chamber, where, alter conviction, according to Laud's account, he mercifully forgave him. ^Basse's History. 85 Colony of Kliode Island were also disregarded. The gov- ernment of that Colony replied to the request of tlie Com- missioners of the United Colonies, that Khode Island should concur in the exclusion of the Quakers, by a letter distin- guished for its fraternal spirit, its sagacity, and its indepen- dence. After cordial expressions of respect anS7. X Proceedings for corner stone of Boston City Hall in 1882. chiefly to puhlic affairs. The company in England, accord- ing to the record of March 2d, 1629, "propounded" to em- ploy John Malbon, a man "having skill in iron works," to go to New England at their expense, and to return and report wliat could be done there in that business.* He performed the service. As this occurred when the company relied on information and advice from Capt. Endecott, lie should have some credit for this attempt to develop the resources of the country. He also showed that he valued and desired to in- crease the strength and independence of the colony, in his letter of December 1, 1643, to Governor Winthrop, in whic-h he says, "I want much to hear of your son's iron and steel. If the country will not be encouraged by so useful a design, to enlarge themselves for the advantage of it, I know not what will."! And whenever the chartered or assumed rights of the Colony were threatened by the Crown, or the church, he was roused in defence, with the watchful jealousy of a mother. Two acts of Governor Endecott, which have often been mentioned to the prejudice of his character for generosity and common sense, should receive such a true representa- tion, as the imperfect records enable one briefly to give. 1, Governor Endecott arrived at Nanmkeag, afterwards called Salem, on September 6th, 1628. In the same year he visited Mount Wallaston or Merry Mount, the site of the town of Quincy, and "rebuked the inhabitants for their pro- faneness, and admonished them to look to it that they walked better."^ "In the purifying spirit of autliority," he cut down the May pole, on which Thomas Morton, the * Archreologia Americana, III. 14. t Hutcliinsou Papers. 135. + Wiuthrop's New England, I. 31. 42 leader of these disturbers, had been ace Printing Co., Boston. Hon. Stephen Salisbury, LL D, presidp:nt of the American antiquarian society SINCE OCTOBER, 1854. From a portrait presented to the Society by members in response to a vote passed October 21, 1877. PRESENTATION OF PORTRAIT. EEPOET OF SAMUEL A. GREEN, M.D., In behalf of the Committee appointed to procure a Portrait of the President of the Society. It is my pleasant duty, saddened only by the thought that it devolves on me through the lamented death of Judge Thomas, to present to the American Antiquarian Society, in behalf of the subscribers, the beautiful picture now before you. For many years the members of the Society, bearing in mind the indefatigable labors of its President, and with a high appreciation of their value, have desired to possess his painted portrait, which might be hung on these walls with that of the founder. This desire took shape at the last annual meeting, when it was formally expressed by vote, and the result is now before you in this speaking like- ness, from the brush of Daniel Huntington, of New York. REMAEKS OF REV. DR. GEORGE E. ELLIS. Mr. President. — I recall that in the last conversation which I had with our late honored Vice-President, he ex- pressed his hearty interest in the measures of the Society to secure this portrait. Had he been with us to-day, the grate- ful office which I am performing would have been discharged by him. It is a satisfaction to us that the design of your associates, in this expression of their respect for you, and of their sense of the many and very great obligations which they owe to you, as the President, and as the constant and munificent benefactor of the Society, has been realized. And it is certainly most fitting that as we owe to your gene- rosity the spacious and attractive hall which we see in its completeness for the first time to-day, we should ourselves hang ujion its walls the inscription it now bears, in the animated canvas. The chief object of a well-executed por- trait, is to preserve the lineaments and features of an absent or a departed friend, when the eye cannot see him, or when he is an object of interest to those who have never seen him. No portrait, however faithfully it might copy nature, would ever be a substitute for your personal living presence to those of us who for many successive years have gathered here in this lovely Autumn weather to find you in the chair at our annual meeting, and to share in your most agreeable hospitalities. , The point of especial interest to us at this moment is as to 57 the skill aiul fidelitj' with which the artist has done his work, for we have regard now to those who are to come after us, and to look upon your portrait as we look upon those of the worthies around us whom we never knew nor saw. Often as I have been looking upon the portrait of some one who lived centuries or scores of years ago, and whose char- acter, genius, works or public service have made him an ol)ject of curious or grateful regard, I have wished that the representation might be accompanied by some certificate authenticating its fidelity to life, prepared and attested by contemporaries and associates. So I could wish now that those of your associates who first see your portrait on the wall, as you sit beneath it, might attest their satisfaction with it as presenting you as you are to us. So far as I can judge from its elevated position, it is a fair and truthful efiigy. I remember a lively discussion around a dinner table about the comparative and relative fitness of full- length and of half-length portraits, as assigned to various orders of men, with titles to distinction and regard for various qualities and services. All seemed to accord in restricting the full-length figure to military men, orators, statesmen and monarchs. For the scholar, the philosopher, the poet, the judge, the magistrate, the philanthropist, the honored heads and representatives of literary and benevo- lent associations, the half-length was the more appropriate. This adjustment of the proprieties in each case, proceeds upon the very reasonable assumption, that all which marks high personality, dignity and intelligence in a man is the portion of his whole frame which is above his waist, the remaining continuation of him having uses of convenience, but not distinctively significant of the qualities of his higher 58 nature. So the artist has presented you to us, sir, as we see you presiding, seated at the table. I indulge the hope that so long as I may be privileged to attend these pleasant meetings, I may be able, as now, to compare the man with the picture. One thing more, Mr. President. Among our many debts to you, I would gratefully recognize this, that within your very limited family, you have furnished us in your son an associate who, by his tastes and his chosen objects of research and thorough study in archaeological science, has already done such effective and rewarding labor in the direction of the original and primary purposes which the Antiquarian Society was formed to serve. EEMAEKS OF HON. GEORGE F. HOAR. A few days ago, one of the ladies of my family visited the household of our deceased brother, Judge Thomas, to express her love and sympathy. One of the Judge's family said that they had derived great comfort and pleasure from the many evidences of the public attachment which they had received since his death, and that she wished her father could have known it in his life-time — that he sometimes thought that people didn't like him. Certainly no man had a stronger hold on the affection of his associates, of the communities where he had lived, and of the whole Com- monwealth, than Judge Thomas. I sometimes think that the fastidiousness of taste, and coldness of speech, inherited from our English ancestors, make us conceal our feelings from our friends until too late. There is no reason why, on an occasion like this, we should abstain from making known to our honored and beloved Tresident what we are all thinking. Mr. Salisbury has for many years filled, in this commu- nity, a most difiicult position — that of a wise and useful manager of large inherited wealth. It is not a hard thing, in this country, for a man with honorable ambitions to raise himself from poverty to wealth. It is comparatively easy to obtain the prizes of professional and political life. But it is a very difficult thing for a man born to the position of wealthiest man in a wealthy community to fill that import- ant station wisely and usefully. Most men so situated 60 deem themselves exonernted from tlie ohligation to work. Our friend has borne his full share of the personal labor of all public undertakings with as much fidelity and public spirit as if he had nothing but his labor to contribute. Many rich men fancy tliat their wealtli entitles them to claim some superiority over their fellow-men. Mr. Salisbury has borne himself with such humility and simplicity that it has never occurred to the humblest man who knew him that they met otherwise than as neighbors and equals. It is said that men who contribute largely to public objects are not without the spirit of patronage or the desire to control. Mr. Salisbury has added to the large benefactions to which the success of almost every enterprise of education or charity in this community for a generation has been due — this society, that reading room, the Technical School, the Mechanics Hall, and countless others — the still larger bene- faction of so limiting his gift that it has been a stimulant to other men to do their share. He has made us feel that it was not he but we that were accomplishing the purpose. He has almost seemed to think when he contributed the endowment to a public oljject which ensured its success, that he was our debtor, and not we his ; and he has never demanded for his opinion in the administration of the enterprise even the weight to which it would be entitled independently of his share in its endowment. Mr. President, I have uttered imperfectly only what is in the hearts of all of us, and if your modesty makes what. I have said disagreeable to you, be assured you are the only person present to whom it is disagreeable. RESPONSE OF PEESIDENT SALISBURY. Gentlemen. — I thank my partial friends for their kind words to justify this expression of respect, and I owe them double thanks for aiding me in doing what they are pleased to commend. When we remember that our lamented Vice- President was prominent in this act, as he was in more important measures of the Society, we renew our grief that he was not permitted to give, by his own administration, new dignity and success to the presidential office. Horace says, " If you put me among the Lyric poets, I shall carry my head high enough to strike the stars." I can feel no such exaltation in the greater honor of placing my portrait with those of the eminent men who have done most to build up the character and usefulness of this learned insti- tution. This testimonial has approached before my face so gradually, that I have no excuse for the extravagance of surprise. I have had time to resist the delusions of vanity. The high office that I hold must have the highest share of the honor of the hour. As to the respect that I can appro- priate to myself, I know how little it is merited, and under what circumstances it has been accorded. With the deepest feeling of obligation, I thank the Society for this evidence of a favorable estimation of my services. I thank the more active members not only for this honor, but more for giving a pretence for it in the success that is chiefly the fruit of their own labors. And my gratitude is increased by their 62 liberality in saving the fnnds of the Society from being diminished on my account. I do not disown my faithfulness and my efforts to pro- mote the strength and usefulness of the Society. But I cannot overlook the fact that the success and acceptableness of my official course are the result of opportunity rather than of mj'- own skill and exertions. In October, 1854, after the lamented death of Hon. John Davis, I was elected as his successor at a happy period. The Society was ready to pass from greater attention to the collection of materials to a more numerous participation in historical inquiries and demonstrations. The value of two volumes of Transactions previously published is not forgotten. For the first we are indebted to the enterprise and special expenditure of Presi- dent Thomas. The learning of Albert Gallatin gave occa- sion for the second. There were other learned papers pub- lished by the Society, but they were infrequent and few. There was no lack of ability and earnestness in the members of that day. The laborious and active Joseph Willard, the learned, witty and copious William Lincoln, the shrewd, quaint and zealous librarian, Christopher Columbus Bald- win, and other faithful members, vrill be remembered. The men were there, but the time did not come until Mr. Haven made himself known as one who could loosen the seals and open the prophecy of the books. His correspondence, sought and valued by the greater and lesser students of his- tory, and his other learned papers, gave a reflected bril- liancy to the Society and the Library. Visitors to the Hall were more frequent and intelligent, and books and docu- ments of a better character were bestowed without solicita- tion and in greater abundance. The co-operation and gene- 63 rosity of members near and remote were aroused. Mr. George Livermore and Dr. Nathaniel B. Sliiirtleff, and others in whose continued presence we rejoice, began to show that tiiey had minds and hearts hirge enougli to take part in the best work here, while tliey abated nothing of their duty to the ancient and pre-eminent Society to which they had given their first love. Another source of your prosperity should be acknowledged. From the Society, and from myself in connection with the incident to which your attention has been called, constant thanks are due to generous friends not members of our Society, who freely gather the treasures of your collection, and amply pay for the privilege by their well-selected gifts, which are a large part of your annual increase. In the interest of our Society I must thank the eminent artist for the ingenuity and skill tliat he has exercised in this work of the imagination. In a few years the personal appearance of the individual will be forgotten. Then no one will regret that a President of the Society has been portrayed as favorably as the subject would permit. The Report of the Committee was accepted, and on motion of Hon. Richard Frothingham, it was voted that a copy of the portrait shall be inserted with the Proceedings of the Society. REMOVAL OF THE TOMB OF TSAIAH THOMAS, LL.D., Founder of the American Antiquarian Society, June 24, 1878. In 1817 Dr. Isaiah Thomas erected in Mechanic Street Burial Ground, in Worcester, a massive and venerable Granite Tomb, which was tlie mortal resting place of him- self and his famil}'-. This Burial Ground, liaving received no interments for many years, had become so subject to the disturbance and encroachments of business, and to careless and wanton injury, that the City Government, with general approbation, ordered that the sacred deposits should be removed to other places of sepulture, at the expense of the City. The City Government judged that tlie public services of Dr. Thomas were worthy of the distinguished honor of an impressive public ceremony, in a change of the place of his tomb tliat was acceptable to his family. The fraterni- ties of Freemasons, and the American Antiquarian Society, were invited and attended to take part in the dedication of the removed tomb placed on a beautiful and conspicuous lot in the Rural Cemetery, provided by members of both institu- tions, in gratitude to their common benefactor. On the 24th of June, 1878, the relatives of Dr. Thomas, members of the Masonic and the Antiquarian Societies, and many citizens met the City Government at Mechanics Hall in Worcester, 66 where the exercises were begun by an appropriate antliem, and a prayer was offered by Rev'd Edward H. Hall, pastor of the Second Parish in Worcester, of which Dr. Thomas had been one of the first members. Hon. Charles B. Pratt, Mayor of the City, then addressed the assembly as follows : — MAYOR PEATT'S ADDRESS. FELLOw-CrnzENS. — The ceremonial which brings together this large assemblage to-day, is one of no ordinary character. In our local associations and our local history, it is an event which serves as a link to bind the centuries together. Almost one hundred 3*ears ago our fathers set apart, in what we may fairly presume to have been a retired portion of the then little rural village, a spot which they consecrated to the burial of their dead. But like him who plants his trees without fully taking in the extent of their future growth and increase, they did not realize that the quiet village of their day was to become a bustling city ; that the little " God's acre," which they then so lovingly and reverently planned and established, would be demanded for other and very diflt'erent purposes by the restless activity of the living future. That time, however, has come. For more than a quarter of a century, surrounded by the din and noise of the work- shop, the hum of machinery, and the constant confusion of travel and traffic, it has gradually become unfitted to the 67 purposes for wliicli it was designed. Nor have our civic autliorities, to whose ward and keeping it was intrusted, been always mindful of their charge. They have allowed it to fall into neglect. They have suftered it to be dese- crated by the trespasses and depredations of later genera- tions, who, in their thouglitlessness, have failed to recognize or to appreciate the hallowed associations by which the spot was surrounded. And now, finally, when the public has asserted its right of eminent domain over it, we are com- pelled to abandon the use of it, for the purposes of sepul- ture, forever. Among those whose remains have so long reposed within those once sacred precincts was one whose name and charac- ter are indelibly stamped upon the history of his time — one whose life and labors were more instrumental, perhaps, than those of any other man of his day and generation, in giving to the city of his adoption the character and distinction which she boasts to day — Isaiah Thomas. But of him it is not becoming, or fitting, that Z should speak. The Society which he founded, and of which he was the first President, the membership of which is not con- fined to one country, which occupies so prominent a position among tlie learned societies of the world, and which has taken so important and active a part in the prosecution of antiquarian research, has its representatives here to-day. The newspaper which he established, and during its earlier years sustained under almost insuperable difiiculties, by w'hich, with his manly fearlessness, and his indomitable per- severance, he did battle for his country in the cause of her freedom and independence, has its representatives here to•d;l3^ The brotherhood of Freemasons, of which he was 68 almost Ills whole life an active and conspicuous member, has also its representatives witli us to-day. To these various representatives, and to the representatives of such other public bodies as may be with us, be assigned the grateful task of commemorating, by their words, the deeds and the fame of him whose mortal remains we are here and now, by appropriate and imposing ceremonies, about to consign to their final resting place. I have the honor to introduce to you our own distin- guished fellow-citizen, the present accomplished President of the American Antiquarian Society, Hon. Stephen Salisbury. ADDRESS OF PRESIDENT SALISBURY. Mr. Mayor, Gentlemen of the City Government, and Fellow-Citizens.— You do well in removing the mortal re- mains of Dr. Isaiah Thomas from a spot where they were overran and desecrated by the heedless feet of the busy world, to a sure and permanent resting place, surrounded by the constant freshness and growth of nature, fit emblems of the higher life of the spirit, when the muddy vesture of decay is thrown off. The members of the American Anti- quarian Society are happy to accept the invitation to jom in the lionorable commemoration^appropriate to this occasion, because Dr. Thomas was a benefactor to the city and the country in establishing the institution intrusted to their care, of which lie was the first President. This honor they may claim for him, tliough there may be much to be desired in the performance of their own duties as members. He was not such a founder as the noble Godfathers, wlio give names, words and nothing more, to the societies which they patronize. The foundation of Dr. Thomas was a firm material snpport, and he added to it a superstrncture, that was hkely to stand, whoever might be the tenants, and he took care that it should be open to the public on every side. As it is proper that the important parts of this struc- ture should be seen and estimated by you at this time, I will endeavor as briefly as possible to point them out. In the vigorous youth of the Kepublic, when Dr. Thomas was engaged with other patriots in deeds most worthy of 70 lionorable remembrance, he was profoundly impressed with the fact that tlie lessons of the time, the results of experi- ments, the decisive discussions, the wise counsels and the vindication of truth and honor from false and partial mis- representation, were passing from human knowledge, and would soon be lost with the decaying paper on which they were recorded. For years before 1812, when he organized the Society, he began to collect books, pamphlets, and news- papers for the library. It was a rare chance to glean in an unreaped field, and he took full advantage of it. This old collection is the attractive nucleus that has drawn together and given a peculiar character to the library, now so large that it lias required the additional building recently erected to contain it. Under this influence the newspaper department has gathered more than 4500 bound vohimes, and is an institution of the highest value in itself. The free public use of the library in the newspapers, even more than in the books, has been nobly rewarded in frequent and sometimes periodical gifts from enlightened friends, not members of the Society, who kiiow only the large hospi- tality and the limited funds of the Society. His Honor the Mayor has reminded us of the direct gifts of Dr. Thouias to promote the prosperity of this ancient town. To the same eflect, his large business and his ser- vices for patriotism and literature also contributed. In founding our Society, he and his chosen counsellors had views above and beyond the local advantage, though the local advantage was not postponed, but furthered, by them. The objects of the Society were two : first, to save the aboriginal and the modern materials of the history of this continent; and, second, to awaken a disposition to preserve 71 and elucidate sncli materials. For this end, the Society was spread over our whole country, including with the tie of membership men distinguished for taste and practice and influence in historical research. The Canadian, the Vir- ginian, and other remote members, have offered their valu- able contributions with more readiness and interest to an institution for which they had enlisted, than thej could feel for a society of Worcester or Massachusetts. Therefore the membership in your city has been restricted by the sys- tem of the Society, and not enlarged according to the abun- dance of talent that is found here. If the practice were otherwise, the Continental character would be lost, though the spirit of membership, the financial resources, and the productive power might be increased. Such local advan- tages have been secured by the " Worcester Society of Antiquity," a kindred institution, that has sprung up at our side in full armor, and has begun its labors with great energy and success. The more important parts of the first volume of the transactions of the American Antiquarian Society are a valuable " Description of Antiquities discovered in Ohio and other Western States," furnished by Caleb Atwater, Esq., of Ohio, and an " Account of the Discovery of the River Mississippi," by Father Hennepin. The large expense of this volume, and other important gifts to carry on the Society, were contributed by Dr. Thomas so quietly that their amount cannot now be discovered. Dr. Thomas also strengthened this institution by a working capital. He gave a fund for collection and research, and a Librarian's and General Fund, that were considered sufiicient and ample according to the money value of that time. Some donations 10 72 have been made to increase these funds and for special objects, but the Society has been substantially supported by its founder. In 1820, he gave a large lot of land to the Society, and built on it a brick hall, which was considered safe from fire, well arranged, and large enough for the pos- sible growth of many years. In 1853, that hall was found to be too small and otherwise inconvenient and undesirable. It was deemed essential to the life of the Society that the building and lot given by the founder should be exchanged for a larger building on an acceptable site. But the old estate, if not used as the giver intended, might revert to his heirs. Then it appeared that the liberal disposition of the founder lasted longer than his life, and his Last "Will was not the last of the good will of his family. Under the influence and example of one of his descendants, wlio had not tlien, within liis reach, the largest income from the most important service of his profession, the family generously relinquished their rights, and the sale of the old estate enabled the Society to build the convenient hall of to-day. I offer a brief and imperfect outline of the American Antiquarian Society, but you will see that it is written all over with the name which you desire to honor. I will not estimate the local advantages of this Institution. I will only venture to say that it is the oldest school for higher learning in your city. It is free and freely used, and it is one of the rare instances of success in the elective system. The founder and his associates and successors do not belong to the old class of miserly antiquaries, who buried their treasures with themselves, and cultivated rust. The aim of this Society is to restore to newness of life the relics of the past, and apply them to the uses of to-day. If Don 73 Quixote should bring here a venerable copper, supposed to be Mambrino's Helmet, it would be faithfully scoured until it was valued as a part of the armor of truth and justice, or cast away as a barber's basin that could never again shave except in a lawful way. The old Society welcomes with the warmst cordiality its younger brotlier in the same line of local instruction, the admirable Free Public Library of your city. I need not state its merits for you know them all. Strangers have sometimes spoken of the intelligence and high character of the population of Worcester, and citizens have boasted of them. After the manner of the old inscription, I will say, if you ask for proof, look around a citizens' meeting in Mechanics Hall, as at this time. If you ask how this character and intelligence were produced, Kev. Dr. Marshall will again, as he did in an eloquent address a year ago, lead you to seven hills more glorious than the Seven Hills of old Home, crowned with seven institutions of higher learning, beaming with the radiance of Christian civilization. ADDRESS OF HON. JOHN D. BALDWIN. Hon. John D, Baldwin, senior editor and publisher of the Worcester Spy, of which Mr. Thomas was the founder, and a member of the American Antiquarian Society, was intro- duced, and spoke as follows : — Isaiah Thomas began public life as a bold supporter of the resisting movements of the colonies against the tyranni- cal measures of George Third. In this interest the Massa- chusetts Spy was started in Boston, July 17, 1770. He was then twenty-one years old, but, young as he was, he had already shown his quality, and made manifest what he would do as conductor of a newspaper. In 1766, when seventeen years old, he went to Nova Scotia to work on the Halifax Gazette, a paper owned by a German named Henry, an easy-going man, who left the printers of the paper to be its editors also. Mr. Thomas became its chief editor, and immediately created a sensation in Halifax, by turning it against the stamp act. He was summoned before the Secretary of the Province who reprimanded him severely, and bade him mend his editorial ways, which he failed to do. A copy of the Pennsylvania Journal, dressed in mourning and bearing significant devices on account of the stamp act, came into his hands. In the next number of the Gazette he said, "We are desired by a number of our read- ers to give a description of the extraordinary appearance 75 of the Pennsylvania Joui^nal of October 30 ; " and he did it by giving Henry's paper tlie same appearance as nearly as possible. Soon afterwards the Halifax stamp master was hung in effigy near the citadel. There were new proceed- ings against Thomas, which, however, did him no harm. He left Halifax in 1768, but did not return to Boston until 1770. He began publishing the ^j»y in partnership with Mr. Fowle, of whom he had learned the printer's trade ; but after three months he became sole owner and manager. Very soon the Spy was known as the boldest and most influ- ential supporter of the Whigs. It had a staff of writers which consisted of some of the ablest and foremost patriots of the colony. Mr. Hudson's " History of Journalism " describes it as " a quite remarkable newspaper which came into existence at this time (1770) and gave great aid and comfort to the prevailing sentiment of the people." He adds " that some of the contributions in the Spy were very powerful. There were other newspapers that supported the cause of the people, but there was no other so able, no other so fearless, no other so intensely hated by the British officials and the Tories, as the Massachusetts Spy.'''' Mr. Thomas states in his " History of Printing," ■ that he began the weekly Spy with two hundred subscribers ; but the increase was so regular and rapid, that, within two years, " its subscription list was larger than that of any other paper printed in New England." That he and the Sjjy had a wide reputation in the colonies, is shown by the fact that he was burned in effigy by the royalists of North Carolina. In Boston, the feeling of the royalists towards Mr. 76 Thomas and his paper became a fierce rage, which sought to destroy them by any means, lawful or unlawful. In 1771, Governor Hutchinson and his council held a special session to consider what should be done with Mr. Tliomas and the Spy. Finally they ordered him to appear before them, but did not put the order in writing, being conscious that it was illegal. Three times they sent a messenger to demand his appearance, verball}^, and three times he refused to appear. It was then proposed to imprison him for contempt ; but they did not venture to attempt tliis. Their next movement was to have him indicted by the Grand Jury ; but the Grand Jury would not indict him. Several other methods of reaching and crushing Mr. Thomas were proposed by the royal officials, but, none of them being legal, they were laid aside, after encountering storms of denunciation from the patriots. He was obliged to maintain this fight with the royalists, so long as his office remained in Boston. A timid man would have been daunted, but Mr. Thomas faced their rage with the utmost boldness. Here is one of his replies to their persecutions. It was written and printed in Octo- ber, 1772 : — " Should the liberty of the press be once destroyed, farewell to the remaiiider of our invaluable rights and privileges ; we may next expect padlocks on our lips, fetters on our legs, and only our hands left at liberty to slave for our more than Egyptian task-masters — or — or — Fight oitr Wat to Constitutional Liberty." In 1775 it became evident that the printing of the Mas- sachusetts Sjyy cov\^ not be continued in Boston. Early in the spring it appeared certain that its office would soon be mobbed and sacked by British soldiers. Everybody felt that the beginning of the revolution was near at hand. 77 Therefore Mr. Thomas decided to remove the publication office of the Spy from Boston to Worcester. The hxst num- ber of the paper printed in Boston is dated April 6, 1775. His press and type were packed up privately, taken across Charles River in the night, with the help of General Warren and others, and sent quietly to the new home of the office. Mr. Thomas tells us that he went to Lexington " at day- break " on the morning of April 19, 1775, and "joined the provincial militia in opposing the king's troops." The first number of the Sj)]/ printed in Worcester is dated May 3, 1775, and contains an account of the battle of Lexingto-n. This was the first printing done in Worces- ter. Mr. Thomas could not save his other property in Bos- ton. When lie arrived here his office was destitute of printing paper. How lie secured liis first supply of this indispensable material is told in the following letter, ad- dressed by Jolm Hancock to Joseph Warren and the Com- mittee of Safety : — " Worcester, 26 April, 1775. " Geatn, — Mr. Thomas, the Printer, is here, has fixed his Press, and is Ready to go on with Business, but is in want of paper. I undertake for him to Desire you will order the under-mentioned Quantity to be sent to him from Milton ; his being supplied will answer Public Service. We are not likely to have even a Single Person to attend us. Mr. Paine is here ; his Townsmen who came with him are returned home. My Servant \s house furniture is in Boston. I should not like to be demolished by a Tory, but I must submit to be unnoticed. God bless you. I am, Gentn., Your Sincere Friend, John Hanoook. 78 " Paper for Mr. Thomas : " 50 reams Crown Printing. " 40 " Demy " " 20 " Foolscap " " 5 " Writing." On tlie back of the sheet was the following : — " On Service of the Colony : To Joseph Warren, Esqr., and the gentlemen of the Committee of Safety, &c., &c., at Cambridge, or elsewhere. John Hancock." When I copied this letter, nineteen years ago, the origi- nal was in possession of Samuel Jennison, Esq., of this city. It is now, I presume, in possession of some members of the Jennison. family. My sketch of the revolutionary work of Mr. Thomas must stop here. It must suffice to add that he did his work faithfully to the end of the struggle ; that he was the first man to read publicly in Massachusetts the Declaration of Independence, and that he lived to see the colonies become a united and independent nation. Hon. H. O. Houghton, of Cambridge, Hon. Marshall P. Wilder, of Dorchester, and Hon. Charles W. Slack, of Bos- ton, made interesting and eloquent speeches; after which the assembly, with the escort of many Masonic fraternities, followed the remains of Dr. Thomas to the Rural Ceme- tery, where the re-interment was made with solemn Masonic rites, and a graceful eulogy was spoken by M. W. Grand Master, Charles A. Welch. War Department Library Washington, D. C. Mo. ,X- Losses or injuries must be promptly ad- justed. No books issued during the month of August. Time Limits : Old books, two weeks subject to renewal at the op- tion of the Librarian. New books, one week only. ACME LIBRARY CARD POCKET Made by LIBRARY BUREAU, Boston KEEP YOUR CARD IN THIS POCKET 7/^.2_ i LIBRARY OF CONGRESS I I I lull III II 014 068 853 8