Class fZ/ooV Pinnk ' A. 3 / (»op>Tight N° COPYRIGHT DEPOSIT. 33p % B» Larue* BOOKS, CULTURE AND CHARACTER. i6mo, #1.00, net. Postage extra. A PRIMER OF RIGHT AND WRONG. i6mo, 70 cents, net. Postpaid, 77 cents. A MULTITUDE OF COUNSELLORS. Being a Col- lection of Codes, Precepts, and Rules of Life, from the Wise of all Ages. Crown 8vo, $2.00. Postpaid, $2.19. A HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES FOR SEC- ONDARY SCHOOLS. With Maps. Crown 8vo, half leather, $1.40, net; postpaid. A HISTORY OF ENGLAND FOR THE USE OF SCHOOLS AND ACADEMIES. With Topical Ana- lyses, Research Questions, and Bibliographical Notes. With 18 Maps and 150 Illustrations. Crown 8vo, half leather, $1.25, net; postpaid. HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN & COMPANY Boston and New York BOOKS, CULTURE AND CHARACTER BOOKS, CULTURE AND CHARACTER BY J. N. LARNED Author of "A Primer of Right and Wrong," ETC. BOSTON AND NEW YORK HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN & COMPANY 1906 LIBRARY Of CONGRESS Twt GoplM fUctived SEP 27 »90« O OttWftt Entry CUSS CX XKC, N», COPY ». 7. o <)3 *< 2 COPYRIGHT I906 BY J. N. LARKED ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Published October igob CONTENTS I. A FAMILIAR TALK ABOUT BOOKS . „ I II. THE TEST OF QUALITY IN BOOKS . . 39 III. HINTS AS TO READING 49 IV. THE MISSION AND THE MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOK . 73 V. GOOD AND EVIL FROM THE PRINTING PRESS 115 VI. PUBLIC LIBRARIES AND PUBLIC EDU- CATION 135 VII. SCHOOL-READING VERSUS SCHOOL- TEACHING OF HISTORY . . . .159 I A FAMILIAR TALK ABOUT BOOKS A FAMILIAR TALK ABOUT BOOKS 1 I WAS asked to say something to you about books ; but when I began to col- lect my thoughts it seemed to me that the subject on which I really wished to speak is not well denned by the word Books. If you had been invited to listen to a discourse on baskets, you would natu- rally ask, " Baskets of what? " The bas- ket, in itself, would seem to be a topic so insignificant that you might reasonably object to the wasting of time on it. It is a thing which has no worth of its own, but borrows all its useful value from the things which are put into it. It belongs 1 Addressed originally to the students of the Central High School, Buffalo, N. Y. 4 A FAMILIAR TALK to a large class of what may be called the conjunctive utensils of mankind — the vessels and vehicles which are good for nothing but to hold together and to carry whatever it may be that men need to con- vey from one to another or from place to place. Now, books are utensils of that class quite as distinctly as baskets are. In themselves, as mere fabrications of paper and ink, they are as worthless as empty wickerware. They differ from one an- other in value and in interest precisely as a basket of fruit differs from a basket of coals, or a basket of garbage from a bas- ket of flowers, — which is the difference of their contents, and that only. So it is not, in reality, of books that I wish to speak, but of the contents of books. It may be well for us to think of books in that way, as vessels — vehicles — carriers — because it leads us, I am sure, to more clearly classified ideas of them. It puts them all into one category, ABOUT BOOKS 5 to begin with, as carriers in the com- merce of mind with mind ; which instantly suggests that there are divisions of kind in that commerce, very much as there are divisions of kind in the mer- cantile traffic of the world ; and we pro- ceed naturally to some proper assort- ing of the mind-matter which books are carriers for. The division we are likely to recognize first is one that separates all which we commonly describe to ourselves as Knowledge, from everything which mind can exchange with mind that is not knowledge, in the usual sense, but rather some state of feeling. Then we see very quickly that, while knowledge is of many kinds, it is divisible as a whole into two great, widely different species, the line between which is an interesting one to notice. One of those species we may call the knowledge of what has been, and the other we will describe as the know- ledge of what is. The first is knowledge of the past ; the second is knowledge of 6 A FAMILIAR TALK the present. The first is History ; the second is (using the word in a large sense ) Science. We are not straining the term Science if we make it cover every- thing, in philosophy, politics, economics, arts, that is not historical ; and we shall not be straining the term Poetry if we use that to represent everything which we have left out of the category of positive knowledge, being everything that be- longs to imagination and emotion. In History, Science, Poetry, then, we name the most obvious assorting of the matter known as Literature, of which books are the necessary carriers. But there is another classification of it, not often considered, which is a more impor- tant one, in my view, and which exhibits the function of books much more impres- sively. Draw one broad line through everything that mind can receive from mind, — everything, — memory, thought, imagination, suggestion, — and put on one side of it all that has come from the ABOUT BOOKS 7 past, against everything, on the other side, that comes from the present, and then meditate a little on what it signifies ! In our first classification we considered the past only with reference to history, or knowledge of the past. Now, I wish to put with that all of our knowledge, of every kind, that has come to us out of the past ; and when you have reflected a moment you will see that that means al- most everything that we know. For all the knowledge now in the possession of mankind has been a slow accumulation, going on through not less than seventy centuries. Each succeeding generation has learned just a little that was new, to add to what it received from the genera- tions before, and has passed the inherit- ance on with a trivial increase. We are apt to look rather scornfully at any sci- ence which is dated before 1900. But where would our brand-new discoveries have been without the older ones which led up to them by painful steps ? In nine 8 A FAMILIAR TALK cases out of ten it was an eye of genius that caught the early glimpses of things which dull eyes can see plainly enough now. Most of the science, then, which we value so in these days, has come to us, in the train of all history, out of the past ; and poetry, too, has come with it, and music, and the great laws of righteous- ness, without which we could be little bet- ter than the beasts. How vast an estate it is that we come into as the intellectual heirs of all the watchers and searchers and thinkers and singers of the generations that are dead ! What a heritage of stored wealth ! What perishing poverty of mind we should be left in without it ! Now, books are the carriers of all this accumulating heritage from generation to generation ; and that, I am sure you will agree with me, is their most impres- sive function. It will bear thinking of a little further. You and I, who live at this moment, ABOUT BOOKS 9 stand islanded, so to speak, on a narrow strand between two great time-oceans, — the ocean of Time Past and the ocean of Time to Come. When we turn to one, looking future-ward, we see nothing — not even a ripple on the face of the silent, mysterious deep, which is veiled by an impenetrable mist. We turn backward to the other sea, looking out across the measureless expanse of Time Past, and, lo ! it is covered with ships. We see them rise from beyond the far horizon in fleets which swarm upon the scene, and they come sailing to us in numbers that are greater than we can count. They are freighted with the gifts of the dead, to us who are the children of the dead. They bring us the story of the forgotten life of mankind, its experience, its learning, its wisdom, its warnings, its counsels, its consolations, its songs, its discoveries of beauty and joy. What if there had been no ships to bring us these ? Think of it I What if the great ocean of Time Past io A FAMILIAR TALK rolled as blankly and blackly behind us as the ocean of Time to Come rolls before us ? What if there were no letters and no books ? For the ships in this picture are those carriers of the commodities of mind which we call Letters and Books. Think what your state would be in a situation like that ! Think what it would be to know nothing, for example, of the way in which American Independence was won, and the federal republic of the United States constructed ; nothing of Bunker Hill ; nothing of George Wash- ington, — except the little, half true and half mistaken, that your fathers could remember, of what their fathers had re- peated, of what their fathers had told to them ! Think what it would be to have nothing but shadowy traditions of the voyage of Columbus, of the coming of the Mayflower pilgrims, and of all the planting of life in the New World from Old World stocks, — like Greek legends of the Argonauts and of the Heraclidae ! ABOUT BOOKS n Think what it would be to know no more of the origins of the English people, their rise and their growth in greatness, than the Romans knew of their Latin begin- nings ; and to know no more of Rome herself than we might guess from the ruins she has left ! Think what it would be to have the whole story of Athens and Greece dropped out of our knowledge, and to be unaware that Marathon was ever fought, or that one like Socrates had ever lived ! Think what it would be to have no line from Homer, no thought from Plato, no message from Isaiah, no Sermon on the Mount, nor any parable from the lips of Jesus ! Can you imagine a world intellectually famine-smitten like that — a bookless world — and not shrink with horror from the thought of being condemned to it ? Yet, — and here is the grim fact which I am most anxious to impress on your thought, — the men and the women who take nothing from letters and books are 12 A FAMILIAR TALK choosing to live as though mankind did actually wallow in the awful darkness of that state from which writing and books have rescued us. For them, it is as if no ship had ever come from the far shores of old Time where their ancestry dwelt ; and the interest of existence to them is huddled in the petty space of their own few years, between walls of mist which thicken as impenetrably behind them as before. How can life be worth living on such terms as that ? How can men or women be content with so little, when they might have so much ? I have dwelt long enough on the gen- eralized view of books, their function and their value. It is time that I turned to more definite considerations. You will expect me, no doubt, to say something of the relative value of books, to indicate some principles in choosing them, and to mark, perhaps, some lines for reading. There must always be a ABOUT BOOKS 13 difficulty in that undertaking for any per- son who would give advice to others con- cerning books, though his knowledge of them surpassed mine a hundredfold. For the same book has never the same value for all minds, and scarcely two readers can follow the same course in their read- ing with the same good. There is a per- sonal bent of mind which ought to have its way in this matter, so far as a deliber- ate judgment in the mind itself will allow. So far, that is, as one can willingly do it who desires the fullest culture that his mind is capable of receiving, he should humor its inclinations. Against an eager delight in poetry, for example, he should not force himself, I am sure, to an obsti- nate reading of science ; nor vice versa. But the lover of poetry who neglects science entirely, and the devotee of science who scorns acquaintance with poetry, are equally guilty of a foolish mutilation of themselves. The man of science needs, even for a large appre- i 4 A FAMILIAR TALK hension of scientific truth, and still more for a large and healthy development of his own being, that best exercise of im- agination which true poetry alone can give. The man of poetic nature, on the other hand, needs the discipline of judg- ment and reason for which exact learn- ing of some kind is indispensable. So inclination is a guide to follow, in reading as in other pursuits, with extrem- est caution ; and there is one favorite di- rection in which we can never trust it safely. That is down the smooth way of indolent amusement, where the gardens of weedy romance are, and the fields in which idle gossip is gathered by farmers of news. Of the value of romance in true literature, and of the intellectual worth of that knowledge of passing events which is news in the real sense, I may possibly say something before I am done. I touch them now only to remark, that the inclination which draws many people so easily into a dissipated reading ABOUT BOOKS 15 of trashy novels and puerile news-gossip is something very different from the incli- nation of mind which carries some to sci- ence, some to history, some to poetry. In the latter there is a turn of intellect, a push of special faculties, a leaning of taste, which demand respect, as I have said. The former is nothing more than one kind of the infirmity which produces laziness in all its modes. The state of a novel-steeped mind is just that of a loun- ging, lolling, slouching body, awake and alive enough for some superficial pleas- ant tickling of sense-consciousness, but with all energy drained out of it and all the joy of strength in action unknown. It is a loaferish mind that can loll by the hour over trash and trivialities in a novel or a newspaper. To come back to the question of choice among good books: there is a certain high region in all departments of literature which every reader who cares to make the most of himself and 16 A FAMILIAR TALK the best of life ought to penetrate and become in some measure acquainted with, whatever his personal leanings may- be. It is the region of the great books — the greatest, that is, of the greater kinds. For the realm of literature is a vast uni- verse of solar systems — of suns and sat- ellites ; and, while no man can hope to explore it all, he may seek and find the central sources of light in it and take an illumination from them which no re- flected rays can give. In poetry (which I must speak of again), I doubt if many people can read very much of minor verse — the verse of merely ingenious fancies and melodious lines — with intel- lectual benefit, whatever pleasure it may afford them. But the great poems, which fuse thought and imagination into one glorified utterance, will carry an enrich- ment beyond measuring into any mind that has capacity to receive them. I be- lieve that those fortunate young people who are wise enough, or wisely enough ABOUT BOOKS 17 directed, to engrave half of Shakespeare upon their memories, lastingly, in their youth, with , something of Milton, some- thing of Goethe, something of Words- worth, something of Keats, something of Tennyson something of Browning, some- thing of Dante, something of Homer and the Greek dramatists, with much of He- brew poetry from the Bible, have made a noble beginning of the fullest and finest culture that is possible. To mem- orize great poems in early life is to lay a store in the mind for which its happy possessor can never be too thankful in after years. I speak from experience, not of the possession of such a store, but of the want of it. I have felt the want greatly since I came to years when mem- ory will not take deposits graciously, nor keep them with faithfulness, and I warn you that if these riches are to be yours at all you must gather them in your youth. A great poem is like a mountain top, 18 A FAMILIAR TALK which invites one toward the heavens, into a new atmosphere, ami a new vision of the world, and a new seise of being. There are no other equal heights in liter- ature except those which have been at- tained by a few teachers of tl e divinest truth, who have borne messages of right- eousness to mankind. Even as literature, to be read for nothing more than their quality and their influence as such, what can compare with the parables and dis- courses of Jesus, as reported in the Gospels ? I know of nothing else that comes nearer to them than a few of the dialogues of Plato, which exhibit the char- acter and represent the higher teachings of Socrates. The three dialogues called the "Apology," the "Crito," and the "Phaedo," which tell the sublime story of the trial and death of Socrates, are writ- ings that I would put next to the books of the Evangelists in the library of every young reader. They were published separately a few years ago, in a small, ABOUT BOOKS 19 attractive volume, under the title of " The Trial and Death of Socrates," and they are also to be found in the second vol- ume of the fine translation of Plato made by Professor Jowett. Another selection of half a dozen of the best of the Socratic dialogues can be had in a charming little book entitled "Talks with Athenian Youths." By the side of these, I would put the " Thoughts " of the Emperor Marcus Aurelius and the " Enchiridion " of Epictetus; and not far from them I would place the " Essays " of Lord Bacon and of our own wise Emerson. These are books, not of mere Know- ledge, but of Wisdom, which is far above Knowledge. Knowledge is brought into the mind ; Wisdom is from its own springs. Knowledge is the fruit of learn- ing ; Wisdom is the fruit of meditation. Knowledge is related to the facts of life, and to man in his dependence on them ; Wisdom is concerned with life itself, and with man in his own being. Knowledge 20 A FAMILIAR TALK equips us for our duties and tasks ; Wis- dom lights them up for us. The great meditative books, such as these I have named, are books that have lifted, exalted, illuminated millions of minds, and their power will never be spent. A book of science grows stale with age, and is superseded by another. The book of wisdom can never grow old. But in this age of science it is apt to be neglected, and therefore I speak with some plead- ing for it. Do not pass it by in your read- ing. In what I say to you, I am thinking of books as we use them in reading, not in study. Study has some special cultivation of mind or particular acquisition in view ; reading is a more general, discursive, and lighter pursuit of the good that is in books. Now, it is looking at them in that way, broadly, that I will make a few sug- gestions about books which belong in what I have classed as the literature of knowledge. I would award the highest ABOUT BOOKS 21 place in that class to history, because it gives more exercise than any other, not alone to every faculty of our intelligence, — to our reason, our judgment, our memory, and our imagination, — but to every moral sensibility we possess. But if history is to be read with that effect, it must not be read as a mere collection of stories of war and battle, revolution and adventure. It must not be traversed as one strolls through a picture gallery, looking at one thing in a frame here, and another thing in a frame there, — an epi- sode depicted by this historian, an epoch by that one, the career of a nation by a third, — each distinct from every other, in its own framing, and considered in itself. To read history in that way is to lose all its meaning and teaching. On the contrary, we must keep always in our minds a view of history as one great whole, and the chief interest we find in it should be that of discovering the connec- tion and relation of each part to other 22 A FAMILIAR TALK parts. Of course we have to pick up our knowledge of it in pieces and sections ; but only so fast as we can put them to- gether, and acquire a wide, comprehen- sive survey of events and movements, in many countries, will historical knowledge become real knowledge to us, and its interest and value be disclosed to our minds. We see then what a seamless web it is, woven, as Goethe describes it, in " the roaring loom of time," of unbroken threads which stretch from the begin- ning of the life of men on the earth, and which will spin onward to the end. We read then the history of our own country as a part of the history of the English people, and the history of the English people as a part of the history of the Ger- manic race, and Germanic history in its close sequence to Roman history, and Ro- man history as the outcome of conditions which trace back to Greece and the an- cient East. We read the thrilling nar- rative of our great civil war, not as a ABOUT BOOKS 23 tragical story which begins at Sumter and ends at Appomattox, but as the tremen- dous catastrophe of a long, inflexible series of effects and causes which runs back from the New World into the Old, and through centuries of time, slowly engendering the conflict which exploded at last in the rebellion of a slave-holding self-interest against the hard-won supre- macy of a national conscience. Concerning history, then, I come back again, with special emphasis, to the coun- sel I gave generally before : read the great books, which spread it out for you in large views. Whatever you may seek in the way of minute details and close studies, here and there, for this and that period and country, get a general ground- work for them in your mind from the comprehensive surveys of the great his- torians. Above all, read Gibbon. If you would comprehend modern history, you must read his " Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire." It is the one funda- 24 A FAMILIAR TALK mental work. Though it is old, nothing supersedes it. It is an unequaled, unap- proached panorama of more than a thou- sand years of time, crowded with the most pregnant events, on the central stage of human history. Whatever else you read or do not read, you cannot afford to neglect Gibbon. Of the ages before Gibbon's period, in Roman, Greek, and Oriental history, there is nothing which offers a really large, comprehensive survey. But Maspero, Sayce, McCurdy, Thirlwall, Grote, Cur- tius, Mahaffy, Mommsen, Merivale, are of the best. For a brief, clear account of the Roman Republic, sketching its inner rather than its surface history, I know of nothing else so good as Horton's " His- tory of the Roman People." Generally, as regards ancient history, there is a warning which I find to be needed. Within quite recent years, the discoveries that have been made, by digging into buried ruins of old cities, ABOUT BOOKS 25 bringing to light and comparing great numbers of records from the remotest times, preserved by their inscription on earthen tablets and on stone, have so added to and so corrected our knowledge of ancient history that the narratives of the older historians have become of little worth. It is an utter waste of time, for example, to read the venerable Rollin, new editions of whose history are still being published and sold. You might as well go to Ptolemy for astronomy, or to Aristotle for physical science. It is a worse waste of time to read Abbott his- tories, and their kind. Beware of them. Mediaeval history, too, and many pe- riods more modern, have received new light which discredits more or less the historians who were trusted a generation or two ago. Hallam is found to be wrong in important parts of his view of the in- stitutions of feudalism. Hume is seen to give untrue representations of English political history at some of its chief turn- 26 A FAMILIAR TALK ing points. Macaulay has done frequent injustice in his powerful arraignment of great actors on the British stage. The study and the writing of history have be- come more painstaking, more accurate, more dispassionate, less partisan and less eloquent, but more just. We get the surest and broadest views of it in Free- man, Stubbs, Maitland, Green, Gairdner, Gardiner, Ranke, May, Lecky, and See- ley for English history, with Bagehot to describe the present working of the Eng- lish Constitution. In continental history, mediaeval and modern, I will mention just a few among many of the books which I think can be recommended safely : Church's " Begin- nings of the Middle Ages," Emerton's "Mediaeval Europe," Bryce's "Holy Roman Empire," some of Freeman's " Historical Essays," Milman's "History of Latin Christianity," Symonds's " Re- naissance in Italy," Trollope's " Com- monwealth of Florence," Ranke' s and ABOUT BOOKS 27 Creighton's histories of the Papacy in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, Hausser's " Period of the Reformation," Baird's Huguenot histories, Motley's M Rise of the Dutch Republic " and " United Netherlands," Gindely or Gar- diner's " Thirty Years War," Perkins's " France under Mazarin," " France under the Regency," and " France under Louis XV.," Rocquain's " Revolutionary Spirit Preceding the Revolution," Prof. Henry Morse Stephen's " French Revolution," Fournier's " Napoleon," Thayer's " Dawn of Italian Independence," Andrews's " Historical Development of Modern Eu- rope," and the series by different writers, entitled " Periods of European History," edited by Arthur Hassell. Moreover, the little books in the series called " Epochs of English History" and "Epochs of Modern History" are almost all of them excellent. Into American history it is best, for several reasons, that we, of this country, 28 A FAMILIAR TALK should go more thoroughly than into that of other countries. One who tries to get his knowledge of it from a single book or two will remain very ignorant. The best of the general narratives which at- tempt to cover the whole, from Columbus, or even from Captain John Smith, to President McKinley, are only sketches that need to be filled. For many parts of that filling, the series of volumes now in course of publication under the general editorship of Professor Hart, of Harvard University, in which successive periods and movements are treated by different writers, can be recommended safely. "The American Nation: A History," is the title of the series. But take from John Fiske, I would say, his colonial histo- ries, — especially " Old Virginia and her Neighbours " and " The Dutch and Qua- ker Colonies," — and his story of " The American Revolution," together with that of "The Critical Period " which fol- lowed it, down to the adoption of the Fed- ABOUT BOOKS 29 eral Constitution. For your own delight you should linger long enough in colo- nial times to read all that Parkman has written of the French in America and of their great effort to possess the continent. Irving, in his " Life of Washington," and McMaster, in his " History of the People of the United States," will give you a good knowledge of the first years of the repub- lic ; but you will never understand Jeffer- son and Madison, and the rise of the great old political parties, and the War of 181 2 with England, if you do not read the his- tory written by Henry Adams, which cov- ers the time between John Adams and Monroe. For the next third of a century, I would trust to Hoist's " Constitutional and Political History," and Professor Burgess's history of "The Middle Pe- riod," as it is named in the " American History Series." These works are made needlessly hard reading by their style, but they are full of good instruction. With them I would place half a dozen 30 A FAMILIAR TALK of the biographies in the series of the "American Statesmen," for side lights thrown upon the politics of the time. Then take Rhodes's " History of the United States from the Compromise of 1850," which carries you through and be- yond the civil war. For that great strug- gle I consider Nicolay and Hay's " Abra- ham Lincoln " to be, on the whole, the best history that has been written yet. It is a huge work, in many volumes, but no one who reads it will waste time or easily tire. Along with it should be read the collected writings of Abraham Lincoln, which are the most lasting literature, excepting, perhaps, Emerson's " Essays," that Amer- ica has produced. As a whole series of state papers, I believe that the speeches, letters, messages, and proclamations of President Lincoln are the most extraor- dinary, in wisdom, in spirit, and in com- position, that ever came, in any country or any age, from the tongue and pen of one man. You will find it an educa- ABOUT BOOKS 31 tion, both in literature and in politics, to read them again and again. Read, too, the simply and nobly written " Personal Memoirs," of General Grant, with those of Sherman, Sheridan, and Joe Johnston, Long's " Life of Lee," Blame's " Twenty Years in Congress," and your knowledge of rebellion history will be quite complete. Then cap your reading in this region of history and politics with Bryce's " Amer- ican Commonwealth," and I would have no great desire to urge more. Biography is in one sense a part of history ; but that which interests us in it most, and from which we take the most good, if we take any, is more than historical. The story of a life which offers nothing but its incidents, informs us of nothing but its achievements, was never worth the telling. Fill it with romance, or glorify it with great triumphs, and still there is small worth in it. If he who lived the life is not in himself more interesting and more significant to us than all the 32 A FAMILIAR TALK circumstance of his life, then the circum- stance is vainly set forth. What biogra- phy at its best can give us, as the finest form of history, and as more than his- tory, is the personal revelation, the in-seen portraiture of here and there a human soul which is not common in its quality. The exemplars that it sets most abun- dantly before us, of a vulgar kind of prac- tical success in the world, — the success of a mere self-seeking talent and industry applied to private business or to public affairs, — are well enough in their way, and may make some small impressions of good effect on some minds ; but we take no inspiration from them — they give us no ideals. What we ought to seek everywhere in books is escape from the commonplace — the commonplace in thought and the commonplace in char- acter with which our daily life surrounds us. Our chief dependence is on books to bring us into intercourse with the picked, choice examples of human kind ; ABOUT BOOKS 33 to show us what they are or what they have beetiy as well as what they have thought, — what they have done, as well as what they have said, — with what mo- tives, from what impulses, with what powers, to what ends, in what spirit, the work of their lives has been done. When biography does that for us it is one of the most precious forms of literature. But when it only crams our library shelves with " process-print " pictures, so to speak, of commonplace characters in commonplace settings of life, we waste time in reading it. I know people who relish biography as they would relish gossip in talk, delighting in disclosures from other men's and other women's lives, no matter how trivial, and all the more, perhaps, when some spicing of scandal is in them. So far as it invites reading in that spirit there is nothing to commend it. But I have never known one person who enjoyed what may be called the fine flavors of character in 34 A FAMILIAR TALK biography who had not fine tastes in all literature. The composition of biography would seem to be one of the most difficult of literary arts, since masterpieces in it are so few. The delightful and noble sub- jects that have been offered it in every age of the world are abounding in num- ber, but how many have been worthily treated? One can almost count on his fingers the biographical works that hold a classic place in common esteem. Gener- ally, of the best and greatest and most beautiful lives that have been lived there is no story which communicates the gran- deur or the charm as we ought to be made to feel it. The most famous of biographies, that of Doctor Samuel Johnson by his ad- miring friend Boswell, has a strong and striking personality for its subject ; but who can read it without wishing that some figure more impressive in human history stood where a strange fortune has ABOUT BOOKS 35 put the sturdy old Tory, in the wonder- ful light that reveals him so immortally ? Among literary men, Sir Walter Scott has come nearer, perhaps, than any other to Doctor Johnson's good fortune, in the life of him written by Lockhart, his son- in-law. Trevelyan's " Life and Letters of Macaulay," and the " Memoirs of Charles Kingsley " by his wife, are probably the best of later examples in literary biogra- phy. But in a certain view all the more eminent " Men of Letters," English and American, may be called biographically fortunate since the publication in Eng- land and America of the two series of small biographies so named. It is true that these are rather to be looked upon as critical studies and sketches than as biographies in the adequate sense ; but most of them are remarkably good in their way, and for these busy days of many books they may suffice. The same is true of the " Twelve English States- men" series in political biography, as 36 A FAMILIAR TALK well as of the series of " American States- men," alluded to before. Using the term " study" in the sense in which artists use it, when, for example, they distinguish between a portrait and a " study of a head," I should apply it to a large class of biographical sketches which are as true to literary art as the most finished biography could be, and only lack its completeness in detail. The prototype of all such writings is found in " Plutarch's Lives," which are studies — comparative studies — of the great char- acters of antiquity, and models to this day of their kind. As we have them in Dry- den's translation revised by Clough, or in the old translation by North which Shakespeare used, there is no better read- ing for old or for young. Scientific biography is at its best, I should say, in the " Life and Letters of Charles Darwin," by his son. In the a Life and Letters " of Huxley, the letters are delightful, and the story of the life ABOUT BOOKS 37 is most interesting, despite a lack of skill in the telling. The " Life of Thomas Edward," the humble Scotch naturalist, by Doctor Samuel Smiles, is hardly to be surpassed as a book of edification and delight, especially for the young. Smiles's " Life of Robert Dick " is nearly but not quite as good ; and the " Auto- biography of James Nasmyth," man of science and great engineer, edited by the same skillful hand, is one of the books which I never lose an opportunity to press upon boys, for the sake of the wonderful example it sets before them, of a thought- ful plan of life perse veringly carried out, from beginning to end. Other works of Smiles in industrial biography — lives of Watts, the Stephensons, and many more — are all exceptionally interesting and wholesome to read. Franklin's autobiography, in the same line of interest and influence, is one of the books which the world would be greatly poorer without. Grimm's " Life of Mi- 38 A FAMILIAR TALK chael Angelo " takes a kindred lesson of life and lifts it to a setting more heroic. Goethe's autobiography and his " Con- versations with Eckermann " are of the books that stamp themselves inefface- ably on a receptive mind, and that ought to be read before the enthusiasms of youth are outworn. But I am particularizing books much more than it was my intention to do. I had planned a hasty excursion along the watersheds of literature, so to speak, just to notice some features of the geography of the world of books, and point here and there to a monument that seemed impor- tant in my view. To assume to be really a guide for any other reading than my own is more than I am willing to under- take. II THE TEST OF QUALITY IN BOOKS THE TEST OF QUALITY IN BOOKS 1 The total result of the education of man- kind is that which we call Civilization, meaning progress toward the finer fitting of men and women for life in the social state. Most of us are too much inclined, I think, to measure the civilization of our own day by its science, which is no true measure at all. The science of the pre- sent age has grown to be very wonderful ; but, much as it may excite us to aston- ishment, there are fruits of civilization, even in this crude period (and it is very crude), which command our admiration more. The finest and most beautiful human products of the time, whom even the Philistines would join us in choosing 1 From some remarks to the Library School at the New York State Library, in May, 1895. 42 THE TEST OF for honor, as exemplars to their genera- tion, might not pass an examination in physics or biology. They are the men and women, sweet with the sweetness and luminous with the light which Matthew Arnold never tired of extolling, who re- present that side of civilization which is refinement more than knowledge, or which is knowledge refined. I speak wrongly, however, when I say of that re- finement that it is one side of civilization ; for it is civilization, and all science that lacks it is barbaric, even though steam engines and the dynamos of Niagara are shaking the earth at its command. Now, the refinements of life come chiefly from its pleasures. That is true to an extent that is sure to surprise us when we think of it first. Unfortunately, it is no less true that the meaner influences which vitiate and vulgarize life, making it gross and coarse, come from the plea- sure side of existence, too. There the main sources of the two are together : on QUALITY IN BOOKS 43 one hand, the springs of all art, — music, poetry, romance, drama, sculpture, paint- ing, — brimmed with delights of the im- agination and the joy of the beauty of the world ; on the other hand, the muddy wells into which so many people choose perversely to dip. From these two foun- tains of pleasure-giving art, one polluted and the other pure, the differing streams are ever flowing. Which of them has floated to us an offered book of entertain- ment is what we must know, if we can. Whether the book is alive with genius or dead with the lack of it, — whether it is brilliant or commonplace, — whether clumsiness or skill is in the construction of it, — are not the first questions to be asked. The prior question, as I conceive, is this : Does the book leave any kind of wholesome and fine feeling in the mind of one who reads it ? That is not a ques- tion concerning the mere morality of the book, in the conventional meaning of the term. It touches the whole quality of the 44 THE TEST OF work as one of true literature. "Does it leave any kind of wholesome and fine feeling in the mind of one who reads it ? " There is no mistaking a feeling of that nature, though it may never seem twice the same in our experience of it. Some- times it may be to us as though we had eaten of good food ; at other times like the tasting of wine ; at others, again, like a draught of water from a cool spring. Some books that we read will make us feel that we are lifted as on wings ; some will make music within us ; some will give us visions ; some will just fill us with a happy content. In such feelings there is a refining potency that seems to be equaled in nothing else. The simplest art is as sure to produce them as the high- est. We take them from Burns' s lines " To a Field-Mouse,' ' from Wordsworth's " Poor Susan," from the story of Ruth, from the story of " The Vicar of Wake- field," from the story of " Picciola," from the story of " Daddy Darwin's Dovecot," QUALITY IN BOOKS 45 as certainly as from " Hamlet" or from " Henry Esmond." The true pleasure, the fine pleasure, the civilizing pleasure to be drawn from any form of art is one which leaves a distinctly wholesome feel- ing of some such nature as these that I have tried to describe ; and the poem, the romance, the play, the music, or the pic- ture, which has nothing of the sort to give us, but only a moment of sensation and then blankness, does us no kind of good, however innocent of positive evil it may be. If the wholesome feeling which all true art produces, in literature or elsewhere, is unmistakable, so, too, are those feelings of the other nature which works of an op- posite character give rise to. Our minds are as sensitive to a moral force of gravi- tation as our bodies are sensitive to the physical force, and we are as conscious of the downward pull upon us of a vulgar tale or a vicious play as we are conscious of the buoyant lift of one that is nobly 46 THE TEST OF written. We have likewise a mental touch, to which the texture of coarse lit- erature is a fact as distinct as the grit in a muddy road that we grind with our heels; And so I will say again that the conclusive test for a book which offers pleasure rather than knowledge is in the question, " Does it leave any kind of wholesome and fine feeling in the mind of one who reads it ? " All this which I am saying is opposed to a doctrine preached in our day, by a school of pretenders in art, whose chat- ter has made too much impression on careless minds. It appeared first, I be- lieve, among the painters, in France, and French literature took infection from it ; then England became somewhat diseased, and America is not without peril. It is the false doctrine which phrases itself in the meaningless motto — " Art for Art's sake ! " " Pursue Art for Art's sake," — "Enjoy Art for Art's sake," cry these aesthetic prophets, who have no compre- QUALITY IN BOOKS 47 hension of what Art is. As well talk of sailing a ship for the ship's sake, — of wheeling a cart for the cart's sake, — of articulating words for the words' sake. Art is a vessel, a vehicle, for the carriage and communication of something from one mind to another mind, — from one soul to another soul. Without a content, it has no more reason for its being than a meaningless word could have in human speech. Considered in itself and for its own sake, it has no existence ; it is an imposture — a mere simulation of Art ; for that which would be Art, if filled duly with meanings and laden with a mes- sage, is then but an artisan's handicraft. The truth is, there are cunning deceits in this pretension to " Art for Art's sake." Those who lead the cry for it do not mean what their words seem to imply. They do not mean the emptiness that one might suppose. What they do mean, as a rule, is to put something ignoble in the place of what should be noble ; some- 48 TEST OF QUALITY IN BOOKS thing vulgar or something vile in the place of what should be wholly pure and wholly fine. What they really strive to do is to degrade the content of Art, and to persuade the world that it can be made the vehicle of mean ideals without ceasing to be Art in the noble sense. The work- ers to that end in literature are very busy, and I suggest this as an important rule in the choosing of books : Beware of the literature of the school which preaches " Art for Art's sake." Ill HINTS AS TO READING HINTS AS TO READING 1 I MAY take for granted, in what I say this evening, that no one who hears me is .indifferent to what Mr. Maurice has called " the friendship of books/' nor re- quires to be persuaded that the reading of good books is an occupation of time so delightful and so profitable that hardly any other can be preferred to it. I may take that for granted, because it is fair to assume that no one who feels indifferent or repugnant to books would come to hear them talked about. And I am glad that it is so ; because I should have no faith to encourage me in speaking to people of that mind. I should not hope to make books appear attractive to any man or any woman who has grown to maturity without feeling the charm of them. I 1 From a lecture. 52 HINTS AS TO READING would do so most gladly if I could ; for not many misfortunes appeal to me more. To know nothing of the friendship that never fails, the companionship that never tires, the entertainment that is never far to seek nor costly to command, the blessed resource that can save every pre- cious hour of life from the dreadful wick- edness of " the killing of Time," — what poverty is greater than that ! Assuming that the worth and the charm of books are undisputed in this company, there is nothing in question here except the discriminations to be ex- ercised among them. I am to offer you such suggestions as I can concerning the reading of books and the choice of books for reading. For reading, be it remem- bered, not for study. The distinction be- tween readers and students is one that I wish to keep in mind. The student, as we think of him, stands for the scholar, to whom books are the business of life, first and before all things, — fundamen- HINTS AS TO READING 53 tal, — implemental, — professional. The reader, on the other hand, has something else for vocation and chief employment, and his book is a happy incident, which night brings to him, perhaps, with his slippers, his easy-chair, and his lamp. What he asks from it is not scholarship, but a well-rounded knowledge, — a wholesome culture, — a quickened im- agination, — a mind nourished and re- freshed. We may all be readers, even to a large, broad measure of the term ; but not many can be students and scholars, in the completer sense. Yet some fraction of true scholarship ought to be perfected in every one. And this, in fact, is the first suggestion I am moved to make, — namely, that, while it is both necessary and better for the majority of people that they should be readers of books in a general way, rather than students and specialists of learning, it is better still that the reading of each one should range with wide free- 54 HINTS AS TO READING dom round some centre of actual study, some chapter of history, some question, some language, some work or some per- sonality in literature, — it scarcely mat- ters what, so long as a little definite province of knowledge is really occupied and possessed, while larger territories around it are only reconnoitred and over- run. I say it is better for the majority of people that they should be readers in a general way, rather than students, be- cause they have not the leisure nor the freedom of mind for large subjects of study, and it is ill for the mind to focus it on small themes too exclusively. Among teachers and original investi- gators the specialization of learning be- comes every day more necessary, as the bulk of science increases ; but every spe- cialist puts his soul in peril, so to speak, by the risk of narrowed faculties and an intellectual myopia to which he is ex- posed. So I would not, for my own part, give a word of encouragement to that HINTS AS TO READING 55 growing class of people who may be called the class of amateur specialists ; be- cause their exclusive devotion to special subjects seems too little and too much; — too little, that is, for any service to human knowledge, and too much for the best development of themselves. I feel no doubt, in the least, that breadth of culture is more important, on the whole, than its depth, to the generality of mankind ; that their character and capability as mem- bers of society are affected more by the area of their knowledge and by the diver- sity of their acquaintance with good lit- erature, than by the minuteness of either. At the same time, I would urge, as I say, the specializing of some object in the intellectual pursuits of every man and woman; not to the exclusion of other subjects and objects, but to their subor- dination. Let there be one thing for each of us that we try to know somewhere nearly to the bottom, with certainty, pre- cision, exactness ; not so much for the 56 HINTS AS TO READING value of the knowledge itself, as for the value of the discipline of thoroughness. If it is something in the line of our daily occupations, — something bearing upon our particular work in the world, me- chanical, commercial, professional, what- ever it maybe, — so much the better. Then, around that one centre of positive study, turning on it as on a pivot, let there be circle after circle drawn of wide discursive reading. If this seems to be a doctrine that is too indulgent of easy habits in reading, and too favorable to superficiality, I will hasten to introduce a second suggestion which cannot be so suspected. It shall be more than a suggestion, for I would make it a very serious admonition and injunction to all who will give atten- tion to me on this subject : Be temperate in Newspapers ! For there is an intem- perance in the newspaper-reading of the day which looks nearly as threatening to me as the intemperance that is fed from HINTS AS TO READING 57 the brewery and the still. To a certain extent, — and I would not be narrow in measuring it, — good newspapers are to be rated with good books, and even be- fore them in one view, because no other reading is so indispensable to the edu- cation that accords with the conditions of life at the present day. I value as highly as one reasonably can the wonder- ful news-knowledge of our time. It is sweeping so much pettiness, so much small provincialism, out of the feeling and thinking of men, making them cosmo- politan, cooperative, tolerant ! With the whole world gathered into one neighbor- hood, so to speak, and the daily story of its doings and happenings made the talk of the breakfast-table, morning by morn- ing, and the chat of the club and the sit- ting-room evening by evening ; with the calamities of Asia, the catastrophes of the South Sea, the tragedies of Muscovy, the agitations of Paris, the politics of London, the sensations of New York, 58 HINTS AS TO READING poured hourly into our consciousness, along with the passing events of our own lives and of the little circles in which we revolve, — how can we fail to outgrow in our sympathies and ideas the provin- cial boundaries that were hard and fast for earlier men ? It is a mighty factor in modern education, this flying world-news that takes wings from the daily press and is gathered from the uttermost parts of the earth. But the staple of it, after all, is gossip ; — world-gossip, to be sure, — history- gossip in great part, — but gossip, never- theless ; and overmuch of it is thin nour- ishment for any robust and capable mind. Unwholesome, too, as well as thin. There is a kind of moral narcotism common to every species of gossip, high or low, which takes possession, like an opium- habit, of the minds that are much given to it, and works degeneracy in them. Who can mistake the morbid effects in that direction which appear in the news- HINTS AS TO READING 59 paper-reading world, and which seem to be magnified from day to day ? The craving for coarser flavors in the news- reports ; for more pungency of sensation ; more photography of vice ; more dram- atization of crime ; more puerile person- ality ; more spying and eaves-dropping ; more invasion and desecration of the pri- vacies and sacred things of life ; — that insatiable craving, which popular jour- nalism panders to, seems to have an in- cessant growth from what it feeds on, and one shudders in imagining the pitch of enterprise and audacity to which re- porters may yet be pushed by it. The fault is no more than half on the side of the newspapers ; it belongs as much, or more, to the readers for whose taste the popular newspapers are made up ; and I am convinced that, if we track home this disease of taste which is gluttonous of the garbage of news, we shall find it mostly among people whose sole literature is from the daily and hebdomadal press ; 60 HINTS AS TO READING who read newspapers and nothing else. They constitute a great class, and I fear it is a growing class, — in this country more, perhaps, than in any other. We are called "a reading people ; " but a news- paper-reading people may be the truer description ; and neither we nor our news- papers, as I have tried to indicate, are im- proved by the excess of interest in them. Let us read the news of the day, by all means. Let us never fail to keep abreast of it, in fair acquaintance with the current movements of event and opinion, maintaining and cultivating a healthy interest in the affairs of the world, great and small, and in the doing, feeling, and thinking of our living fellow men. But let us be temperate in it ; let us not saturate ourselves with the sensations of the passing day. Let us reserve some room in our minds for a knowledge of the past, its ideas and its history, and of present things that are not caught by the reporter's pencil or the editor's pen. HINTS AS TO READING 61 I have placed intemperance in news- paper-reading even before intemperance in novel-reading, because I look upon it as the more serious of the two ; but the latter is a very grave evil, contributing to a mental and moral debility which we must not treat lightly. Understand that I speak only of intemperance in novel- reading, or of intemperance and ill-selec- tion together ; for I am not of those who despise the novel, or condemn it in a sweeping way. In my view it has its place among the higher forms of litera- ture, — of literature as art, — and so far as it is made fitting to that high place, by the genius which has a right to create it, the novel is a gift to be welcomed and enjoyed. In the reading of a young per- son I would not withhold a fair — even a liberal — proportion of wholesome and finely woven romance. We must not be of the school of the Gradgrinds. Some nutriment is demanded for our souls be- sides the nutriment of facts. The intel- 62 HINTS AS TO READING lectual life is not all remembering, or all reckoning and reasoning. It includes feeling and imagination, and we need to cultivate that side of our nature no less than the other, for a rounded, sane devel- opment of ourselves. We need to culti- vate it, moreover, by other means and from other sources than books. Nature, to those who read her, is more eloquent than any poem ; and no love-tale is so interesting as the every-day life that we have under our eyes. Yet the poetry and romance in books have a singular impor- tance in this region of culture, because, if we choose them well, they can bring to us the reinforcement of imaginations that are greater than our own, and touch us through sensibilities and sympathies that are finer than we possess. If they do not that, they can do us no good, and we may better leave them unread. What I say of romance need only be writ larger for poetry, and it is equally true. A true poem — the simplest true HINTS AS TO READING 63 poem — will bring something to us that is a revelation ; some glimpse that we never had before of a meaning in things that lights them up to us ; or some thrill of an emotion which attunes us in newly- felt relations with God, or Nature, or Man. There is no true poetry which does not that ; and the idle rhyme that has only the lilt in it of a few dancing words, or the sparkle of a few trifling fancies, will defraud us of the time spent in reading it. Read pure, true poetry, as you would open your window on a morning in June ; as you would walk in a garden when the flowers are spread, or into the fields when the corn is ripe ; as you would go up to the mountains, or out on the shore of the sea. Go to it for the light and the gladness and the bloom of beauty and the larger horizons and the sweeter atmosphere you can find in it, for the rest and refreshment and revivifying of your souls. What is not read for the kinds of prac- 64 HINTS AS TO READING tical knowledge that we call information is to be read for some such good to one's soul, if there is anything of worth in its print. Facts for our store of practical knowledge ; teachings and exercises for our understanding and reason ; illumin- ation and inspiration for the spiritual- ities that are in us ; wholesome stimulants for our lighter sensibilities, of fancy and of humor and the like, — these are the differing kinds of good for which we can go to books, and one or the other of which we should require them to supply. We know when they answer the demand ; generally we know when they fail. Teachings, illuminations, inspirations, are unmistakable experiences of mind ; but the wholesome gratifications of fancy and humor are not always so distinguish- able from the unwholesome, and it is there that the flood of modern fiction brings difficulty into the question of books. It is a difficulty which each reader must prepare to overcome, in the HINTS AS TO READING 65 main, for himself. The discriminating sense — the feeling for what is good and for what is not good in the vast out- put of novel-writing at the present day — can be trained by exercising it on the undisputed classics of fiction that we in- herit from the past. One who reads Cer- vantes, Defoe, Scott, Dickens, Thack- eray, George Eliot, Charles Kingsley, Erckmann-Chatrian, and others of the " old masters " of romance, till they have grooved habits of taste in his mind, is not likely to be cheated by any prentice- work, tricked out in later styles. And the more substantial literature, — the concrete literature of fact, — what shall I say of that? I am not here to urge people into this course of reading or that, dictated, as the counsel would naturally be, by my own inclinations of taste. There can be no kind or course of reading that is best for all. The bent of each mind is to be yielded to ; not wholly, but so far as will determine the 66 HINTS AS TO READING main direction pursued : as to whether it shall be in history, or travel, or natural science, or social science, or philosophy, or art. Embarrassed as we are by the multitude and variety of things that claim attention in the world, we may, any of us, neglect philosophy, or the arts, or half the sciences ; but we must read some- thing of history, if we are to understand at all the stage on which we are acting, — the plot of the drama of life in which we are playing parts, — the world and the humanity to which we belong. And there are some suggestions on that point that I am glad to have an opportunity to make. First, I would say, give a little atten- tion — more than is given commonly - — to the background of history. It is one of the discoveries of recent times that there is such a thing as a background to history. Our ancestors knew of nothing behind the written annals of mankind, except the mist-cloud of fables from which they start. For us, however, there is HINTS AS TO READING 67 accumulated already a wonderful body of prehistoric knowledge, more or less conjecturable and debatable, to be sure, but exceedingly significant, nevertheless, throwing flashes of light into the dim dawns of civilization and society. It is made up of a multitude of hints and frag- ments of fact, picked here and there out of the roots of old languages and the kitchen - heaps, cave -relics, and burial- mounds of primitive savage men, which are found to have surprising meanings when they are put together and com- pared and construed. To learn what we are able to learn from them, concerning the early divisions, relations, and move- ments of the tribes and races of mankind, before any kind of written record was made, or any name or personal figure appears, to produce for us the first dim picture of living history, is to acquire a most important ground of understanding for the recorded history that starts out from it later on. 68 HINTS AS TO READING Even more interesting than this pre- historic background is what may be called the semi-historic background which lies between it and the fairly visible, well-lighted scenery of historic time. That, too, is a discovery of our own exploring age. Half a century ago the beginnings of the most dimly known history antedated our Christian era by little more than two thousand years. Now, as the result of inquisitive digging into the sand-covered ruins of ancient cities of the East, where civilization and letters had their birth, we are reading messages from more than twice that depth in the pre-Christian past ; and the story of the most ancient world has not only been extended but retold. It has been set before us in entirely new lights. In a thousand particulars, and in most of the meaning it had to modern minds, the old understanding of it is found to have been wrong. We who were read- ers of ancient history as it was written HINTS AS TO READING 69 half a century ago are having to read it and learn it anew. The books that were classic in this department of history a generation ago — and they include the books of Biblical exposition and illustra- tion, as well as those in profane history — are as nearly worthless to-day as hon- est books can be made. Many readers, I fear, are not clearly conscious of that fact, and are wasting study on obsolete books. The parts of history much affected by these recent discoveries are those which touch primitive Egypt and west- ern Asia, and the legendary ages of the Greeks. Otherwise, the literature of an- cient history that was authoritative and good a generation ago is so, for the most part, now. This reminds me to repeat a word of counsel which I find frequent reason to urge : Take your history, as much as possible, from the greater writers, — from the historians who treat it in the largest way, with the amplest knowledge, 7 o HINTS AS TO READING the most illuminating thought, the clear- est style. This may seem uncalled-for advice, but it is not. In my library ex- perience I have encountered many people who entertain a certain fear or distrust of the really great historical works. They want, as they say, something less learned, less elaborate, — something sim- ple, comprehensive, and plain. They think it will be easier to take instruction from one volume of a compiler than from half-a-dozen of a great original work. They make a very serious mistake. The history that is "writ large,' ' from full knowledge, is the history that can be made easy of apprehension and delight- fully interesting to the mind. Those who read it in compends and compilations lose its flavors ; lose the taste of life and living people in it; lose its organic whole- ness, — the logic and the lesson of it ; lose most, in fact, of what history is worth reading for, and do not get the simplicity and comprehensiveness they sought. HINTS AS TO READING 71 At the same time, I am convinced that it is well to prepare for the large reading of any part of history by etching into the mind, as it were, a rough outline of the whole career of the greater races of man- kind, from Egypt and Babylon down to Britain and America, so that, whenever and wherever we fill in the details by fuller reading of this and that national history or individual biography, the parts will adjust themselves in their relative places and be correlated properly with each other. I do not mean by this to advise the general reader of history to cumber his mind with an extensive store of precise dates, but only that he should establish in his memory a fixed and firm association of the epochs, the important movements and the great characters that are contemporaneous, co-sequent and in- teractive in different regions of the world. To leave this chronological framework of historical knowledge to be pieced to- gether as one goes on with his larger 72 HINTS AS TO READING reading seems to me a mistake. Better, I should say, sit down with a good epit- ome and make a business of building the main sections of it into the memory at once. It is not my purpose to commend writers or writings specifically ; I am simply urging fealty to the indisputably best, which do not need, as a rule, to be advertised. In name, at least, they are marked generally by common fame. If they are not known they can easily be ascertained ; and it is part of a reader's training to learn by sedulous inquiry what is the superlative literature in any field he may approach. IV THE MISSION AND THE MIS- SIONARIES OF THE BOOK THE MISSION AND THE MIS- SIONARIES OF THE BOOK. 1 FOR the most part, that lifting of the human race in condition and character which we call civilization has been wrought by individual energies acting on simply selfish lines. When I say this, I use the term selfish in no sense that is necessarily mean, but only as indicating the unquestionable fact that men have striven, in the main, each for himself more than for one another, even in those striv- ings that have advanced the whole race. Within certain limits there is no discredit to human nature in the fact. A measure of selfishness is prescribed to man by the terms of his individuality and the conditions of his life. His only escape 1 An Address at the University Convocation (State of New York), in June, 1896. 76 THE MISSION AND THE from it is through exertions which he must employ at first in his own behalf, in order to win the independence and the power to be helpful to his fellows. So it seems to me quite impossible to imagine a process that would have worked out the civilization of the race otherwise than by the self-pushing energy that has im- pelled individual men to A plant, to build, to trade, to explore, to experiment, to think, to plan, primarily and immediately for their own personal advantage. But if the more active forces in civili^ zation are mainly from selfish springs, there are two, at least, which have nobler sources and a nobler historic part. One is the sympathetic impulse which repre- sents benevolence on its negative side, pained by the misfortunes of others and active to relieve them. In the second, which is more rare, we find benevolence of the positive kind. Its spring is in a purely generous feeling, which strongly moves one to communicate to others MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOK 77 some good which is precious to him in his own experience of it. It is a feeling which may rise in different minds from different estimates of good, and be directed toward immediate objects that are unlike, but the disinterested motive and ultimate aim are unvarying, and it manifests in all cases the very noblest enthusiasm that humanity is capable of. There seems to be no name for it so true as that used when we speak of a mission- ary spirit, in efforts that aim at the shar- . ing of some greatly cherished good with people who have not learned that it is good. At the same time we must re- member that mere propagandisms put on the missionary garb without its spirit, and spuriously imitate its altruistic zeal ; and we must keep our definition in mind. There are always true missionaries in the world, laboring with equally pure hearts, though with minds directed to- ward many different ends of benefaction 78 THE MISSION AND THE to their fellows. But only two objects — the spiritual good of mankind, contem- plated in religious beliefs, and the intel- lectual good, pursued in educational plans — have ever wakened the mission- ary spirit in a large, world-moving way. The supremely great epochs in human history are those few which have been marked by mighty waves of altruistic en- thusiasm, sweeping over the earth from sources of excitation found in one or the other of these two ideals of good. Naturally the first wakening was under the touch of beliefs which contemplate a more than earthly good ; and those be- liefs have moved the missionary spirit at all times with the greatest passion and power. But even the religious wakening was not an early event in history. I think I may safely say that no trace of it is to be found among the worshipers of remote antiquity. The Hebrew prophets never labored as dispensers of a personal bless- ing from their faith. It was for Israel, the MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOK 79 national Israel, that they preached the claims and declared the requirements of the God of Israel. The priests of Osiris and Bel were still more indifferent to the interest of the worshiper in the worship of their gods, thinking only of the honor demanded by the gods themselves. So far as history will show, the first mission- ary inspiration would seem to have been brought into religion by Gotama, the Buddha, whose pure and exalted but enervating gospel of renunciation filled Asia with evangelists, and was carried to all peoples as the message of a hope of deliverance from the universal sorrow of the world. Then, centuries later, came the commission more divine which sent forth the apostles of Christianity to tell the story of the Cross and to bear the offer of salvation to every human soul. As religiously kindled, the missionary spirit has never burned with more fervor than it did in the first centuries of Chris- tian preaching; but nothing akin to it 80 THE MISSION AND THE was set aflame in the smallest degree by any other eagerness of desire for the com- munication of a blessing or good to man- kind. Until we come to modern times, I can see no mark of the missionary mo- tive in any labor that was not religious. The one object which, in time, as I have said, came to rival the religious object as an inspiration of missionary work, the modern zeal for education, was late and slow in moving feelings to an unselfish depth. Enthusiasm for learning at the period of the renaissance was enthusiasm among the few who craved learning, and was expended mostly within their own circle. There was little thought of press- ing the good gift on the multitude who knew not their loss in the lack of it. The earliest great pleader for a common edu- cation of the whole people was Luther ; but the school was chiefly important in Luther's view as the nursery of the church and as a health-bringer to the state, and he labored for it more as a MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOK 81 means to religious and political ends than as an end in itself. Almost a century after Luther there appeared one whom Michelet has called " the first evangelist of modern pedagogy," John Amos Co- menius, the Moravian. The same thought of him, as an evangelist, is expressed by the historian Raumer, who says : " Co- menius is a grand and venerable figure of sorrow. Wandering, persecuted and homeless during the terrible and desolat- ing Thirty Years' War, he yet never de- spaired, but with enduring truth and strong in faith he labored unweariedly to prepare youth by a better education for a better future. He labored for them with a zeal and love worthy of the chief of the Apostles." And the education for which Comenius labored was no less, in his own words, than "the teaching to all men of all the subjects of human concern." Proclaiming his educational creed at an- other time, he said : "I undertake an organization of schools whereby all the 82 THE MISSION AND THE youth maybe instructed save those to whom God has denied intelligence, and instructed in all those things which make man wise, good and holy." Here, then, had arisen the first true mis- sionary of common teaching, who bore the invitation to learning as a gospel proffered to all childhood and all youth, and who strove in its behalf with apostolic zeal. The period of the active labors of Comenius was before and a little after the middle of the seventeenth century. He made some impression upon the ideas and the educational methods of his time, but Europe generally was cold to his enthusiasm. In one small corner of it, alone, there was a people already pre- pared for and already beginning to real- ize his inspiring dreams of universal edu- cation. That was Holland, where the state, even in the midst of its struggle for an independent existence, was assum- ing the support of common schools and attempting to provide them for every MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOK 83 child. In that one spot the true mission- ary leaven in education was found work- ing while the seventeenth century was still young, and from Holland it would seem to have been carried to America long before the fermentation was really felt in any other land. Elsewhere in the Old World, if Come- nius found any immediate successor in the new field of missionary labor which he had practically discovered and opened, it was the Abbe La Salle, founder of the great teaching order of the Christian Brothers. But the zeal kindled by La Salle, which has burned even to the pre- sent day, was essentially religious in its aims and dedicated to the service of his church. The spirit in common teach- ing still waited generally for that which would make a secular saving faith of it, urgent, persisting, not to be denied or escaped from. The world at large made some slow progress toward better things in it ; schools were increased in number 84 THE MISSION AND THE and improved ; Jesuits, Jansenists, Ora- torians and other teaching orders in the Roman Church labored more intelli- gently ; middle-class education in Eng- land and other countries received more attention. But the conscience of society in general was satisfied with the open- ing of the school to those who came with money in their hands and knocked at its door. There was no thought yet of stand- ing in the door and crying out to the moneyless and to the indifferent, bidding them come. Far less was there thought of going out into the highways and hedges to bring them in. Another cen- tury of time was needed and a long line of apostolic teachers, agitators, and administrators, like Pestalozzi, Father Girard, Frobel, Humboldt, Brougham, Horace Mann, to inspire that feeling for education which warms the western na- tions of the world at last : the feeling for education as a supreme good in itself, not merely as a bread-making or a money- MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOK 85 making instrument ; not merely for giv- ing arithmetic to the shop-keeper, or bookkeeping to the clerk, or even politi- cal opinions to the citizen ; not merely for supplying preachers to the pulpit, or physicians to the sick-room, or lawyers to the bench and bar ; but in and of and for its own sake, as a good to humanity which surpasses every other good, save one. This is what I call the missionary spirit in education, and it has so far been wakened in the world that we expect and demand it in the teaching work of our time, and when we do not have it, we are cheated by its counterfeit. But this zeal for education was ani- mated in most communities sooner than the thought needed for its wise direction. There was a time not long ago when it expended itself in schoolrooms and col- leges and was satisfied. To have laid be- nignant hands on the children of the gen- eration and pushed them, with a kindly coercion, through some judicious cur- 86 THE MISSION AND THE riculum of studies was thought to be enough. That limited conception of edu- cation as a common good sufficed for a time, but not long. The impulse which carried public sentiment to that length was sure to press questions upon it that would reach farther yet. " Have we ar- rived," it began to ask, "at the end for which our public schools are the means ? We have provided broadly and liberally — for what ? For teaching our children to read their own language in print, to trace it in written signs, to construct it in gram- matical forms, to be familiar with arith- metical rules, to know the standards and divisions of weight and measure, to form a notion of the surface features of the earth and to be acquainted with the principal names that have been given to them, to remember a few chief facts in the past of their own country. But these are only keys which we expect them to use in their acquisition of knowledge, rather than knowledge itself. When they MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOK 87 quit the school with these wonderful keys of alphabet and number in their posses- sion, they are only in the vestibule cham- bers of education. Can we leave them there, these children and youth of our time, to find as best they may, or not find at all, the treasuries we would have them unlock?" To ask the question was to answer it. Once challenged to a larger thought of education, the missionary spirit of the age rose boldly in its demands. The free school, the academy, the college even, grew in importance when looked at in the larger view, but they were seen to be not enough. They were seen to be only blessed openings in the way to knowledge, — garlanded gates, ivory portals, golden doors, but passage-ways only, after all, to knowledge beyond them. And the knowledge to which they led, while much and of many kinds may need to be gleaned in the open fields of life, out of living observations and expe- riences, yet mainly exists as a measure- 88 THE MISSION AND THE less store of accumulated savings from the experience and observation of all the generations that have lived and died, re- corded in writing and preserved in print. There, then, in the command and posses- sion of that great store, the end of edu- cation was seen to be most nearly real- ized ; and so the free public library was added to the free public school. But strangely enough, when that was first done, there happened the same halt- ing of spirit that had appeared in the free public school. To have collected a li- brary of books, and to have set its doors open to all comers, was assumed to be the fulfillment of duty in the matter. The books waited for readers to seek them. The librarian waited for inquirers to press their way to him. No one thought of out- spreading the books of the library like a merchant's wares, to win the public eye to them. None thought of trying by any means to rouse an appetite for books in minds not naturally hungry for learning MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOK 89 or poetry or the thinking of other men. So the free or the nearly free public li- braries, for a time, wrought no great good for education beyond a circle in which the energy of the desire to which they answered was most independent of any public help. But this stage of passive existence in the life of the free public library had no long duration. Soon the missionary pas- sion began to stir men here and there in the library field, as it had stirred teach- ers in the schools before. One by one, the inspiration of their calling began to burn in their hearts. They saw with new eyes the greatness of the trust confided to them, and they rose to a new sense of the obligations borne with it. No longer a mere keeper, custodian, watch- man, set over dumb treasures to hold them safe, the librarian now took active functions upon himself and became the minister of his trust, commanded by his own feelings and by many incen- 9 o THE MISSION AND THE tives around him to make the most in all possible ways of the library as an in- fluence for good. The new spirit thus brought into library work spread quickly, as a beneficent epidemic, from New Eng- land, where its appearance was first no- tably marked, over America and Great Britain and into all English lands, and is making its way more slowly in other parts of the world. The primary effort to which it urged librarians and library trustees was that toward bettering the introduction of books to readers ; toward making them known, in the first instance, with a due setting forth of what they are and what they offer; then toward putting them in right relations with one another, by groupings according to subject and lit- erary form and by cross-bindings of reference ; then toward establishing the easiest possible guidance to them, both severally and in their groups, for all seek- ers, whether simple or learned. When MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOK 91 serious attention had once been given to these matters there was found to be need in them of a measure of study, of experi- ment, of inventive ingenuity, of individ- ual and collective experience, of practical and philosophical attainments, that had never been suspected before. These dis- coveries gave form to a conception of "library science," of a department of study that is entitled to scientific rank by the importance of its results, the pre- cision of its methods, the range of its de- tails. The quick development of the new science, within the few years that have passed since the first thought of it came into men's minds, is marked by the rise of flourishing library schools and classes in all parts of the United States, east and west. For more efficiency in their common work, the reformers of the library were organized at an early day. The American Library Association on this side of the sea and the Library Association of the 92 THE MISSION AND THE United Kingdom on the other side, with journals giving voice to each, proved pow- erful in their unifying effect. Ideas were exchanged and experiences compared. Each was taught by the successes or warned by the failures of his neighbors. What each one learned by investigation or proved by trial became the property of every other. The mutual instruction that came about was equaled only by the working cooperation which followed. Great tasks, beyond the power of indi- viduals, and impossible as commercial undertakings, because promising no pe- cuniary reward, were planned and labori- ously performed by the union of many coworkers, widely scattered in the world, but moved by one disinterested aim. From one hundred and twenty-two libra- ries, in that mode of alliance, there was massed the labor which indexed the whole body of general magazine literature, thus sweeping the dust from thousands of vol- umes that had been practically useless MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOK 93 before, bringing the invaluable miscel- lany of their contents into daily, definite service, by making its subjects known and easily traced. The same work of cooperative indexing was next carried into the indeterminate field of general miscellaneous books. By still broader co- operation, a selection of books was made from the huge mass of all literature, with sittings and resiftings, to be a standard of choice and a model of cataloguing for small new libraries. And now topical lists on many subjects are being prepared for the guidance of readers by specialists in each subject, with notes to describe and value the books named. The possibili- ties of cooperation in library work are just beginning to be realized, and the great tasks accomplished already by it will probably look small when compared with undertakings to come hereafter. But, after all, it is the individual work in the libraries which manifests most dis- tinctly the new spirit of the time. The 94 -HE MISSION AND THE perfected cataloguing, which opens paths for the seeker from every probable start- ing-point of inquiry, not only to books, but into the contents of books ; the mul- tiplied reading lists and reference lists on questions and topics of the day, which are quick to answer a momentary inter- est in the public mind and direct it to the best sources for its satisfaction ; the annotated bulletins of current literature, which announce and value as far as practicable, by some word of competent criticism, the more important publications of each month; the opening of book- shelves to readers, to which libraries are tending as far as their constitution and their circumstances will permit ; the evo- lution of the children's reading-room, now become a standard feature to be provided for in every new building design, and to be striven for in buildings of an older pattern ; the invention of traveling libra- ries and home libraries ; the increasing provision made in library service for MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOiv 5 helping students and inquirers to pur- sue their investigations and make their searches ; the increasing cooperation of libraries and schools, with the growing attraction of teachers and pupils toward the true literature of their subjects of study, and the waning tyranny of the dessicated text-book ; in all these things there is the measure of an influence which was hardly beginning to be felt a quarter of a century ago. I have named last among the fruits of this potent influence the cooperation of libraries and schools, not because it stands least in the list, but because the whole missionary inspiration from every stand- point of solicitude for the educational good of mankind is united and culminated in it and is doing its greatest work. The missionary teacher and the missionary librarian come together in these new ar- rangements, working no longer one in the steps of the other, — one carrying forward the education which the other 96 THE MISSION AND THE has begun, — but hand in hand and side by side, leading children from the earliest age into the wonderful and beautiful book- world of poetry, legend, story, nature- knowledge, or science, time-knowledge or history, life-knowledge or biography, making it dear and familiar to them in the impressionable years within which their tastes are formed. The school alone, under common conditions, can do no- thing of that. On the contrary, its text books, as known generally in the past, have been calculated to repel the young mind. They have represented to it little but the dry task of rote-learning and recitation. They have brought to it no- thing of the flavor of real literature, nor any of that rapturous delight from an inner sense of rhythmic motions which real literature can give : neither the dancing step, nor the swinging march, nor the rush as with steeds, nor the lift and sweep as with wings, which even a child may be made to feel in great poetry MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOK 97 and in noble prose, and which once expe- rienced is a beguiling charm forever. The whole tendency of the text-book teaching of school is toward deadening the young mind to that feeling for liter- ature, and alienating it from books by a prejudice born of wrong impressions at the beginning. Just so far as the school reader, the school geography, the school history and their fellow compends, are permitted to remain conspicuous in a child's thought during his early years, as representative of the books which he will be admonished by and by to read, so far he will be put into an opposition never easy to overcome. The tenderest years of childhood are the years of all others for shaping a pure intellectual taste and creating a pure in- tellectual thirst which only a noble liter- ature can satisfy in the end. We have come at last to the discernment of that pregnant fact, and our schemes of edu- cation for the young are being recon- 98 THE MISSION AND THE structed accordingly. There is no longer the division of labor between school and library which seemed but a little time ago to be marked out so plainly. Schools are not to make readers for libraries, nor are libraries to wait for readers to come to them out of the schools. The school and the world of books which it makes known to him are to be identified in the child's mind. There is to be no distinction in his memory between reading as an art learned and reading as a delight dis- covered. The art and the use of the art are to be one simultaneous communica- tion to him. That is the end contemplated in the cooperative work of libraries and schools, which, recent in its beginning, has made great advances already, and which espe- cially appeals to what I have called the missionary enthusiasm in both libraries and schools. It contemplates what seems to be the truest ideal of teaching ever shaped in thought: of teaching not as MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOK 99 educating, but as setting the young in the way of education ; as starting them on a course of self-culture which they will pursue to the end of their lives, with no willingness to turn back. The high- est ideal of education is realized in that life-long pursuit of it, and the success of any school is measured, not by the little portion of actual learning which its students take out of it, but by the persisting strength of the impulse to know and to think, which they carry from the school into their later lives. But there are people who may assent to all that is said of education in this life- lasting view of it, who will deny that there is a question in it of books. " We," they say, " find more for our instruction in life than in books. The reality of things in- terests us more and teaches us more than the report and description of them by others. We study men among men and God's works in the midst of them. We prefer to take knowledge at first hand, L OF C. ioo THE MISSION AND THE from nature and from society, rather than second-handedly, out of a printed page. Your book- wisdom is from the closet and for closet-use. It is not the kind needed in a busy and breezy world." Well, there is a half-truth in this which must not be ignored. To make everything of books in the development of men and women is a greater mistake, perhaps, than to make nothing of them. For life has teach- ings, and nature out of doors has teach- ings, for which no man, if he misses them, can find compensation in books. We can say that frankly to the contemner of books and we yield no ground in doing so ; for then we turn upon him and say : " Your life, sir, to which you look for all the enlightenment of soul and mind that you receive, is a brief span of a few tens of years ; the circle of human acquain- tances in which you are satisfied to make your whole study of mankind is a little company of a few hundred men and women, at the most ; the natural world MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOK 101 from which you think to take sufficient lessons with your unassisted eyes is made up of some few bits of city streets and country lanes and seaside sands. What can you, sir, know of life, compared with the man who has had equal years of breath and consciousness with you, and who puts with that experience some large, wide knowledge of seventy centuries of human history in the whole round world besides ? What can you know of man- kind and human nature compared with the man who meets and talks with as many of his neighbors in the flesh as yourself, and who, beyond that, has com- panionship and communion of mind with the kingly and queenly ones of all the generations that are dead? What can you learn from nature compared with him who has Darwin and Dana and Hux- ley and Tyndall and Gray for his tutors when he walks abroad, and who, besides the home-rambling which he shares with you, can go bird-watching with John 102 THE MISSION AND THE Burroughs up and down the Atlantic states, or roaming with Thoreau in Maine woods, or strolling with Richard Jefferies in English lanes and fields?" Truth is, the bookless man does not understand his own loss. He does not know the leanness in which his mind is kept by want of the food which he rejects. He does not know what starving of imagination and of thought he has inflicted upon himself. He has suffered his interest in the things which make up God's knowable universe to shrink until it reaches no farther than his eyes can see and his ears can hear. The books which he scorns are the telescopes and reflectors and reverberators of our intel- lectual life, holding in themselves a hun- dred magical powers for the overcoming of space and time, and for giving the range of knowledge which belongs to a really cultivated mind. There is no equal substitute for them. There is nothing else which will so break for us the poor MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOK 103 hobble of every-day sights and sounds and habits and tasks, by which our think- ing and feeling are prone to be tethered to a little worn round. Some may think, perhaps, that news- papers should be named with books as sharing this high office. In truth, it ought to be possible to rank the news- paper with the book as an instrument of culture. Equally in truth, it is not pos- sible to do so, except in the case of some small number. The true public journal — diary of the world — which is actually a news-paper and not a gossip-paper, is most powerfully an educator, cultivator, broadener of the minds of those who read it. It lifts them out of their petty per- sonal surroundings, and sets them in the midst of all the great movements of the time on every continent. It makes them spectators and judges of everything that happens or is done, demands opinions from them, extorts their sympathy and moves them morally to wrath or admi- 104 THE MISSION AND THE ration. In a word, it produces daily, in their thought and feeling, a thousand large relations with their fellow men of every country and race, with noble re- sults of the highest and truest culti- vation. But the common so-called newspaper of the present day, which is a mere rag- picker of scandal and gossip, searching the gutters and garbage-barrels of the whole earth for every tainted and unclean scrap of personal misdoing or mishap that can be dragged to light ; the so-called newspaper which interests itself, and which labors to interest its readers, in the trivialities and ignoble occurrences of the day — in the prize fights, and mean pre- liminaries of prize fights, the boxing matches, the ball games, the races, the teas, the luncheons, the receptions, the dresses, the goings and comings and private doings of private persons — making the most in all possible ways of all petty things and low things, while MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOK 105 treating grave matters with levity and impertinence, with what effect is such a newspaper read? I do not care to say. If I spoke my mind I might strike harshly at too many people whose read- ing is confined to such sheets. I will venture only so much remark as this : that I would prefer absolute illiteracy for a son or daughter of mine, total in- ability to spell a printed word, rather than that he or she should be habitually a reader of the common newspapers of America to-day, and a reader of nothing better. I could say the same of many books. So far, in speaking of books, I have been taking for granted that you will under- stand me to mean, not everything with- out discrimination which has the form of a book, but only the true literature which worthily bears that printed form. For if we must give the name to all printed sheets, folded and stitched together in a certain mode, then it becomes necessary 106 THE MISSION AND THE to qualify the use we make of the name. Then we must sweep out of the question vast numbers of books which belong to literature no more than a counterfeit dollar belongs to the money of the coun- try. They are counterfeits in literature, — base imitations of the true book ; that is their real character. Readers may be cheated by them precisely as buyers and sellers may be cheated by the spurious coin, and the detection and rejection of them are effected by identically the same process of scrutiny and comparison. Every genuine book has a reason for its existence, in something of value which it brings to the reader. That something may be information, it may be in ideas, it may be in moral stimulations, it may be in wholesome emotions, it may be in gifts to the imagination, or to the fancy, or to the sense of humor, or to the humane sympathies, or indefinably to the whole conscious contentment of the absorbing mind ; but it will always be a fact which MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOK 107 those who make themselves familiar with good and true books can never mistake. Whether they find it in a book of history, or of travel, or of biography, or of piety, or of science, or of poetry, or of nonsense (for there are good books of nonsense, like "Alice in Wonder- land," for example), they will infallibly recognize the stamp of genuineness upon it. The readers who are cheated by base and worthless books are the readers who will not give themselves an expert knowledge of good books, as they might easily do. Here, then, opens one of the greater missionary fields of the public library. To push the competition of good books against worthless books, making readers of what is vulgar and flat acquainted with what is wholesome and fine, is a work as important as the introduction of books among people who have never read at all. There is a theory which has some acceptance, that any reading is 108 THE MISSION AND THE better than no reading. It rests on the assumption that an appetite for letters once created, even by the trash of the press, will either refine its own taste or else will have prepared a susceptibility to literary influences which could not otherwise exist. Those who hold this doctrine have confidence that a young devourer of dime novels, for example, may be led on an ascending plane through Castlemon, Optic, Alger, Mayne Reid, Henty, Verne, Andersen, De Foe, Scott, Homer, Shakspere, more easily than a boy or girl who runs away from print of every sort can be won into any similar path. For my own part, I fear the theory is unsafe for working. It will prob- ably prove true in some cases ; I am quite sure that it will prove dangerously false in many others. There are kinds of habit and appetite in reading which seem to be as deep-rooted in unhealthy states of mind and brain as the appetite for opium or alcohol. They grow up MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOK 109 among the habitual readers of such news- papers as I have been speaking of, and equally among readers of the slop-shop novels, vulgar or vile, with which the world is flooded in this age of print. The newspaper appetite or the trash-novel appetite, once fastened on the brain of its victim, is not often unloosed. It masters all other inclinations, permits no other taste or interest to be wakened. The stuff which produces it is as danger- ous to tamper with as any other dream- and stupor-making narcotic. To bait readers with it, expecting to lure them on to better literature, is to run a grave risk of missing the end and realizing only the mischiefs of the temptation. Far safer will it be to hold the public library as strictly as can be done to the mission of good books. And that is a vague prescription. How are " good books" to be defined? — since their goodness is of many degrees. The mere distinction between good and bad in lit- J no THE MISSION AND THE erature I believe to be recognized easily, as I have said, by every person who has tasted the good and whose intellectual sense has been cultivated by it to even a small extent. But between the supremely good and that which is simply not bad, there are degrees beyond counting. From Sardou to Shakspere, from Trumbull to Homer, from Roe to Thackeray, from Tupper to Marcus Aurelius, from Tal- mage to Thomas a Kempis or Thomas Fuller, from Jacob Abbott to Edward Gibbon, the graduation of quality is beyond exact marking by any critical science. How shall we draw lines to dis- tinguish the negatively from the posi- tively good in letters ? We simply can- not. We can only lay down loose lines and put behind them the never relaxing spring of one elastic and always prac- ticable rule : Strive unceasingly for the best. Give all the opportunities to the best literature of every class. Give front places on all possible occasions to the MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOK 1 1 1 great writers, the wise writers, the learned writers, the wholesome writers ; keep them always in evidence ; contrive in- troductions for them ; make readers fa- miliar with their standing and rank. There is little else to be done. The pub- lic library would be false to its mission if it did not exclude books that are posi- tively bad, either through vice or vul- garity ; but much beyond that it cannot easily go. Happily, it cannot force the best literature upon its public ; for if it could, the effect would be lost. But it can recommend the best, with an insist- ing urgency that will prevail in the end. I am by nature an optimist. Things as they are in the world look extremely disheartening to me, but I think I can see forces at work which will powerfully change them before many generations have passed. Among such forces, the most potent in my expectation is that which acts from the free public library. ii2 THE MISSION AND THE Through its agency, in my belief, there will come a day — it may be a distant day, but it will come — when the large knowledge, the wise thinking, the fine feeling, the amplitude of spirit that are in the greater literatures, will have passed into so many minds that they will rule society democratically, by right of num- bers. I see no encouragement to hope that the culture which lifts men from gen- eration to generation, little by little, to higher levels and larger visions of things, will ever be made universal. Under the best circumstances which men can bring about, nature seems likely to deny to a considerable class of unfortunates the capacity, either mentally, or morally, or both, for refinement and elevation. But if that be true at all, it cannot be true of any formidable number. Among the pro- gressive races, the majority of men and women are unquestionably of the stuff and temper out of which anything fine in soul and strong in intellect can be MISSIONARIES OF THE BOOK 1 13 made, if not in one generation, then in two, or three, or ten, by the continual play upon them of influences from the finer souls and greater minds of their own times and of the past. It is not by nature but by circumstance, heredity itself being an offspring of circumstance, that light is shut from the greater part of those who walk the earth with darkened minds. Man is so far the master of circumstance that he can turn and diffuse the light almost as he will, and his will to make the illumination of the few common to the many is now beyond dispute. All the movements that I have reviewed are marks of its progressive working. It translates into active energy that desire for others of the good most precious to one's self, which is the finest and noblest feeling possible to human nature. All the forces of selfishness that race men against one another, from goal to goal of a simply scientific civilization, would fail to bring about this supreme end of ii 4 MISSION OF THE BOOK a common culture for the race. Nothing but the missionary inspiration could give a reasonable promise of it. Let us thank God for the souls He has put into men, having that capability of help- fulness to one another. V GOOD AND EVIL FROM THE PRINTING PRESS GOOD AND EVIL FROM THE PRINTING PRESS 1 From the first movement of its lever, the Press brought an immeasurable new force into modern civilization. Its earli- est service was rendered mainly to schol- arship, in the diffusion of the classic writ- ings of antiquity, but very quickly it was drawn into a more popular arena, and gave a voice to the appeals of religion, a weapon to theological dispute. The rapidity of its work at that early period is shown by the rapidity of the spread of the ideas of the Reformation, for which it was a vehicle that could not have been spared. Between Gutenberg's death and Luther's birth there were only fifteen 1 From an address at the meeting of the Ameri- can Library Association, 1896. n8 GOOD AND EVIL FROM years ; but the reformer found already an extensive public prepared to be reached and acted on by the printed tract and book. That the intellectual horizons of life were widened from that day is one of the plainest historical facts. Its skies, too, were lifted to a loftier arch, and it was made larger in all ways, by energies which the new instrument of knowledge set free. For then, and long afterward, there was earnestness in the splendid work of type and press. Some kind of purpose — not always good, or wise, or true, or wholesome, but something that had thought behind it, or fact, or im- agination, or emotion, — was in most things that received the printer's stamp. Through the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries there are not many shallows in the stream of print. At the opening of the nineteenth cen- tury the book and the tract remained still the principal products of the Press, and the custody or conveyance of ideas was THE PRINTING PRESS 119 still its chief employ. It had engaged itself already in a lighter service, as the messenger of news ; but that was a mere apprenticeship, not yet promising of much effect. So long as the gathering of news depended on the vehicles of the olden time, it was too slow and too limited a work to stir the world. But when the energy of steam and the speed of lightning were offered to the News- paper Press, that passed suddenly to the front of all the influences acting on man- kind. School, pulpit, and platform were left behind it. The mastery of our later civilization, in the moral moulding of it, if not more, was soon seen to have been grasped by adventurers in a new com- merce, which made merchandise of pass- ing history and marketed the tidings of the day. Meantime, the common school had been doing its work far and wide, and most men and women of the leading races had learned to read. That is to say, 120 GOOD AND EVIL FROM they had learned to decipher language put into print, or had learned reading as a simple art ; but the educational use — the culture use — of the art was some- thing which no majority of them had yet acquired. To make readers of them practically as well as potentially, another agency was wanted beyond that of the school, and the newspaper came appar- ently to supply it. Books and libraries of books were not equal to the service required. Perhaps it will always be im- possible for book literature of any kind to push its way or to be pushed into the hands of the people with the penetrating energy that carries newspapers to all homes. At all events, the common school, making possible readers, and the news- paper inviting them to read, arrived together, at a conjunction which might have seemed to be a happy miracle for the universalizing of culture in the Western world. The opportunity that came then into the hands of the conductors THE PRINTING PRESS 121 of the news press, with the new powers that had been given them, has never been paralleled in human history. They might have been gardeners of Eden and planters of a new paradise on the earth ; for its civilization was put into their hands to be made what they would have it to be. If it could have been possible then to deal with newspapers as other educational agencies are dealt with ; to invest them with definite moral responsibilities to the public ; to take away from them their commercial origin and their mercenary motive ; to inspire them with disinterested aims ; to endow them as colleges are endowed ; to man them for their work as colleges are manned, with learning and tried capacity in the editorial chairs ; — ■ if that could have been possible, what im- aginable degree of common culture might not Europe and America be approaching to-day ? As it is, we are trying to explain to ourselves a condition of society which alarms and shames all who think of it 122 GOOD AND EVIL FROM Nevertheless, during the first few dec- ades of the modern news market, — as it took shape, we will say, early in the eighteen-forties, — the influence of the newspapers was generally more whole- some than otherwise. Readers of them were made acquainted with things worth the knowing. The world and their life in it, as parts of a great whole, were widened to them wholesomely and genu- inely, and by much more than the larger knowledge of it which they gathered from day to day. The widening of the sympathetic life of mankind, meaning thereby an increment and expansion of all the feelings which press men into closer and warmer relations, and prepare them for truer understandings of each other, was the supreme effect upon them of the daily world-history that began to be reported to them in the period named. But a time came when one arose among the brokers of the news market who made a discovery which proved THE PRINTING PRESS 123 nearly fatal to the character and dignity of journalism. He discerned, that is, with low shrewdness, an unbounded possi- bility of degradation in human curiosity and vanity, as opening a great, vulgar, and profitable field for unscrupulous ex- ploitations of the newspaper press. He was not long alone in the enjoyment of his ignoble discovery. One by one, the traffickers in news yielded to the cor- rupting example, or were driven by less scrupulous competitors into the ranks of the new journalism ; till, to-day, we can count on the fingers of not many hands the important newspapers (in America, at least) that will give us real and clean news, and not force us to strain some meagre pickings of it out of a sickening mixture of trivialities, mor- bidities, vulgarities, impertinences, and worse. Here and there we may still bow with respect before a newspaper over which the responsible editor has kept his sov- 124 GOOD AND EVIL FROM ereignty. In most instances he has been deposed, and the irresponsible reporter reigns in his place, — master of the awful power of the Press, — chief educator of his generation, — pervading genius of the civilization of his time. Trained to look at all things, in heaven above or in the earth beneath, with an eye single to the glory of big type, he sees them in one aspect. The great and the little, the good and the bad, the sweet and the foul, the momentous and the trivial, the tragic and the comic, the public and the sacredly private, are of one stuff in his eyes, — mere colorings of a fabric of life which Time weaves for him to slit and to slash with his merciless, indiffer- ent shears. And so, with little prejudice and small partiality between things high and low, he makes the daily literature on which most of us feed and tincture our minds. It is a monotoned literature, and its one note is flippancy : the flippant headline, the flippant paragraph, the flip- THE PRINTING PRESS 125 pant narrative, the flippant comment. To jest at calamity, to be jocular with crime, to sting personal misfortune with a smart impertinence or cap it with a slang phrase ; to be respectful and serious to- ward nothing else so much as toward the gayeties of the world of fashion and the gaming of the world of sport, appear to be the perfections of the art to which he is trained. And no careful observer can fail to see that the degradation of the newspaper press is degrading most of the voices of the time. The shallow flippancy which began in journalism is affecting litera- ture in every popular form. More and more the air is filled with thin strains of wordy song ; but the deep-toned mel- odies of thoughtful poetry are dying out of it fast. Rhymers multiply apace, and the reporter inspires them. They worship the god Novelty with him, and Apollo is forgotten. They exercise a nimble fancy on tight-ropes and trapezes 126 GOOD AND EVIL FROM of metrical invention, in performances that are curious to behold. The art- world, too, is infected with the irresponsible levity which had its genesis in the newspaper. Half of the men and women who paint pictures are doing so with scornful denials of any thoughtful purpose in their work. "Art for Art's sake" is the senseless formula of their contempt for the reverent service of im- agination and reason which Art could command from them if Art knew them at all. On all the commoner sides of its life there is singularly and lamentably a shallowness, a flippancy, a vulgarity, in the present age. Who can dispute the fact ? And what is plainer than the causes we can find, in that precipitate, enormous expansion and acceleration of communi- cation in the world which has occurred within our time, acting on civilized so- ciety, and most powerfully in America, in three modes, namely : (i) an increas- THE PRINTING PRESS 127 ing excitement of commerce, following closely upon the loss from it of all its older incidents of discovery and adven- ture, producing, for the time, a vulgariz- ing mercenary nakedness ; (2) an abrupt plunge for the freer peoples from theo- retical into practical democracy, conse- quent on the sudden creation of tremen- dous new agencies of combination and organization, and the generating of a public opinion that is a new and untrained force in the world ; (3) the evolution of the modern newspaper and its speedy corruption, from the mighty servant of civilization that it ought to be into the busy pander of every vulgarity that the new conditions can feed. But this is not the end of the story. These are but early effects, — effects in their beginning, from great enduring causes, the operation of which they can- not exhaust. If the common mind of the age is trivialized and vulgarized by its newspapers and its commerce, it is being 128 GOOD AND EVIL FROM pricked, at the same time, to a new alertness, even by the worst journalism and the fiercest money-making, and faculties are being wakened in it that will some day answer the call to higher uses. The influences which will bear on it to that result are gathering volume and weight. For powerful forces are working even now in the world to broaden life for those who will have it so, not super- ficially, but profoundly, and not in mere sense and circumstance, but in conscious- ness and power. There are some ideas which, when they have got a setting in the mind, are like magnifying lenses to the eye of reason, clearing and enlarging its whole vision of things. The Copernican idea of the structure of the universe was such an one. By dispelling the human egotism of the view which put man and his habita- tion at the centre of creation, it opened new vistas to thinking in a hundred directions. The idea which Newton THE PRINTING PRESS 129 brought to light, of a unity of law in the universe, was another. The completer development of that idea in the doctrine of the correlation of forces, or the present notion of energy, is another. But of all the emancipating conceptions which, one by one, have entered and possessed the mind of man, there was never one before that brought such liberations with it as came in Darwin's message to our own time. It is hardly too much to say that the full, free exercise of human reason on all the greater problems of life and destiny, whether personal or social, really began with the perception and apprehen- sion of evolutionary processes in God's work. That has raised the thinking minds of our day to a summit of obser- vation which was never attainable before, while eager science brings daily new helps to them for the expansion of their view. It is true that this intellectual expan- sion of life is known nowhere to all men. Even so much of it as goes with vague 130 GOOD AND EVIL FROM glimpses of the working of universal law is still no common experience ; while those who know it in its fullness are every- where a few. But something from it is diffusing itself in the whole atmosphere of the age; something penetrating, stimulating, virile ; something which most men are compelled to feel whether they comprehend it or not, and to which the finer elements in them must respond by some sort of rally and growth. Of hopeful phenomena in the world, that one is the greatest of all. It indexes a new state of the common mind, now cleared for the most part of old superstitions, and thus prepared for the receiving of light to dispel its old ignorances. And what a wakening of moral no less than intellectual energies there is in our time, for work directed to that end ! A little while ago the steam engine, the factory, the forge, the mine, the mart, represented about all the human energy that made itself conspicuous in the civil- THE PRINTING PRESS 131 ized world, excepting some occasional explosions of it in movements of religious and political enthusiasm and in raging outbursts of war. To-day it is not so. No little part of the interest, the ardor, the force, the ingenuity which spent themselves on those objects before are going over into a very different field. We are seeing the rise of an enterprise in education which almost rivals the en- terprise of mechanic industry and trade. Invention is half as busy in the improv- ing of schools, in the perfecting of in- struction, in the circulating of books, in the stimulating of reading and study, as it used to be busy in the making of machines. The diffusion of literature is left no longer to depend, like the diffusion of cotton fabrics or tea, on the mercenary agencies of trade. Half a century ago the free public library was created. For thirty years past it has been worked over by one set of people, just as the steam engine has been worked over by another 132 GOOD AND EVIL FROM set, and the electric dynamo by a third. Its powers have been learned, its effi- ciency developed, in the same scientific way. Cunning variations of form are being wrought in it, to fit all circum- stances and to do its civilizing work in all places. It becomes a Traveling Li- brary to make its way into villages and rural corners of the land. It becomes a Home Library to reach the tenement- houses and purlieus of the city. It spreads itself in branches and delivery stations. It distributes choice reading in the schools, to broaden the teacher's work. It drums and advertises its un- priced wares like a shop-keeper, avari- cious of gain. It is taking up the eager, laborious, strenuous spirit of the present age, and wresting some large part of it away from the sordid activities of life, to give it unmercenary aims. So books are being made to do con- siderably alone what books and newspa- pers ought rightly to be doing together. THE PRINTING PRESS 133 As a carrier in the spiritual commerce of the world, the book is not nearly so agile, so lightly winged, so Mercury-like as the newspaper can be ; but when each is at the best, how much nobler is the freight- age of books ! I rest my faith in a future of finer culture for mankind on the energy of free public libraries in distributing good books, far more than on any other agency that is working in the world. So far they have but opened gates into the field of influence that is before them ; but the gates are really swung wide, and the length and breadth of the field is fully seen, and the spirit that will possess it and work in it is eagerly alive. I speak soberly when I say that the greatest an- tagonism to be met and overcome is that of the vulgarized part of the newspaper press. I say this with persisting iteration, because I am convinced that it is the fact which needs most at the present day to be understood. How to win readers of 134 THE PRINTING PRESS the general mass from unwholesome newspapers to wholesome books, or how to change the spirit of the common news- papers of the day from flippancy to so- briety, — from the tone of the worst in social manners and morals to the tone of the best, — is one of the gravest pending problems of civilization, if not the gravest of all. The zeal and energy of free schools and free libraries can achieve the solu- tion of it, and I see nothing else that can. VI PUBLIC LIBRARIES AND PUBLIC EDUCATION PUBLIC LIBRARIES AND PUBLIC EDUCATION 1 The function of our free circulating libra- ries is diffusion, which is a function of active responsibility. The prime purpose of their institution is to bring to bear upon the greatest possible number of people the profitable influences that are found in books. That object restricts them to no narrow range. It takes in whatever can be tributary to all that has excellence and value in men. It embraces the wholesome literature of imagination and emotion, no less than the literature of knowledge and thought. The graces and harmonies of education, and the sweet- enings and colorings of life, are compre- 1 From a paper read before the American Social Science Association, in 1883. 138 PUBLIC LIBRARIES AND hended equally with the ethics and the practical powers. There is no narrow- ness in the range, as I have said ; but it has a well-marked bound. It is bounded by all the lines in literature which sepa- rate purity from grossness, art from rub- bish, good from bad. It is so bounded by its purpose, which I think I have stated with precision when I say that the sole reason for the existence of a popular library is the endeavor made through it to bring to bear on the greatest possible number of people the profitable influ- ences that are in books ; and it has no excuse for being if it cannot discriminate with some success between the profitable and the unprofitable quality of books. Of course this involves a selective crit- icism, or a censorship of books, if one chooses to call it so, in the government of popular libraries ; but what then ? Is not the same kind of selective criticism, — the same kind of discriminative judg- ment, — the same censorial assumption, PUBLIC EDUCATION 139 — involved in all public services, from legislation down ? To what public insti- tution will it be denied ? If a gallery of art is founded, for the finer teaching of the eyes of the people, and for kindling the light of the love of beauty in their souls, does any one claim a place in it for the pictorial advertisements of the cir- cus, or for the popular sculpture of the cemeteries, on the ground that there is a public which finds pleasure in them ? Yet something comparable with that de- mand is found in the frequent expecta- tion that public libraries shall descend to levels of taste in literature which all cul- tivated taste condemns. It is assumed quite naturally that somewhere in the control of a public art-collection there shall be an instructed criticism at work, to distinguish, with what care and capa- bility it can, the true productions of art from its counterfeits, and to set up cer- tain standards of taste which it is desir- able to have urged upon the public for 140 PUBLIC LIBRARIES AND common recognition. Wherein are the considerations which bear on the popu- larizing of literature and the teaching of books, by means of public libraries, dif- ferent from those that bear on the popu- larizing of art by public museums of painting, sculpture, and design ? If they differ at all it is by reason of the greater power and greater importance of the educating influence in books. I am not thinking altogether of ques- tions touching fiction in public libraries, which have been much discussed ; though that, in the treatment of this subject, takes, of course, the foremost place. It is a question much discussed, but not always on broad grounds. Here is a form of literature that we have seen, almost in our own generation, rise from a modest rank in the realm of letters to undisputed ascendency. It has introduced a new Muse to our Olympus and has throned her royally in the highest seat, where the crown and the sceptre, the honors and PUBLIC EDUCATION 141 the powers of the pen, are alike given up to her. For my part, I am submissive to the revolution that has brought us under this new reign in literature ; I have no discontent with it. I recognize the mod- ern Romance, or Novel, as the true heir and natural successor of the Epic and the Drama, which held anciently, in their turn, the regal place in literature. I look upon it as representing no mere literary fashion of the day, but distinctly a de- velopment in literary art — the plastic shaping by organic growth of a new, perfected form of epic and dramatic ex- pression moulded in one ; fitting itself to new conditions of general culture, with more versatile capabilities and powers. It is not alone approved by the suffrages of the multitude, it is preferred by the bards and " makers " themselves. More and more we can see that the dramatic genius of the age turns lovingly to this new form of art and expends itself upon it. If Shakspere were living in these 142 PUBLIC LIBRARIES AND days, I doubt not we should have more novels than plays from his pen. At all events the chief power in litera- ture for our generation belongs to the novel, and if we will recognize and deal with it broadly in that view there is nothing lamentable in the fact. Let us freely concede to it the great domain it has won for itself on the art-side of litera- ture, and pay to it the respect we give to all art — no less, no more. We can hardly claim to have done that yet. There is something half disdainful, half shamed and apologetic, in the very hom- age conceded to this new-comer among the Muses. Her devotees do not seem to be quite assured of her Olympian repu- tability, and find, perhaps, a little pleas- ure in the suspicion that she and Folly are near kin. So we all continue to speak of the realm of " light literature ; " as though the literature that is weighted with the fruits of the genius of George Eliot, Thackeray, Dickens, Balzac, Hawthorne, PUBLIC EDUCATION 143 Scott, De Foe, can justly be called " light." The lightness which it has is the lightness of the spirit of art — the lightness which art takes from the up-bearing wings on which it is exalted, and whereby it has the power to transport us high and far, and make us travelers beyond the swim- ming of ships or the rolling of wheels. Whatever it may be that acts on men with that kind of power is a factor in education as important as science or his- tory. It is like the wine and sweetness of the fruits which are the wholesome peptic trifles of our bodily food, and it contributes quite as much as the strong meats of learning to a vigorous and symmetrical growth of human char- acter. In the novel, these potencies of art are universalized more than in any preceding form ; it brings a larger mass of mankind within their range, to be quickened in spirit by them and to be wrought upon by an inward leaven which human beings are sodden without. As 144 PUBLIC LIBRARIES AND a true product of art in literature, the novel seems to me to be a great instrument of education, in the large sense of the word — not for all men and women, perhaps, but for most, and especially for those whose lives are narrow and constrained. There are not many of us who do not owe to it some reaches and happy vistas of the intellectual landscape in which we live, and the compass of our thoughts, feelings, sympathies, tolerances, would shrink sadly if they were taken away. It is only a little region of actual things that we can include in our personal hori- zons — a few individual people, a few communities, a few groups and growths of society, a few places, a few situations and arrangements of circumstance, a few movements of events, that we can know and be familiar with by any intimacy and experience of our own. But how easily our neighborhoods and acquaintances are multiplied for us by the hospitable genius of the novelist ! To be put in PUBLIC EDUCATION 145 companionship with Caleb Garth and Adam Bede, with Colonel Newcome and Henry Esmond ; to meet Mrs. Poyser and Mr. Weller ; to visit in Barsetshire with Mr. Trollope and loiter through Alsace with the Messrs. Erckmann and Chatrian ; to look on Saxon England with the imagination of Kingsley, on Eighteenth-century England with the sympathetic understanding of Thack- eray, on Puritan Massachusetts with the clairvoyance of Hawthorne — how large and many-sided a life must be to em- brace in its actualities so much of a ripen- ing education as this ! But, if there is no other form in which the broadening influences of art can be exercised more powerfully than in the novel, there is no other form that lends itself to base counterfeiting so easily. And the vulgar product is vulgar beyond comparison with any other. More than vulgar; for the travesty of life which these romances of book-smithing exhibit 146 PUBLIC LIBRARIES AND is mischievous in its whole effect. Every feeling that they act upon, every senti- ment that they stimulate, every idea that they produce, is infected with the falsity that is in them. Neither virtue nor piety in the intention with which they are com- posed can better very much the evil influence they exert ; for clean as they may be of all other vice, there is wick- edness in their misrepresentations and depravity in their untruth. I see nothing for my own part but malarial unwhole- someness, breeding moral distempers and intellectual debility, in the trash of fiction with which the world is being flooded, whether it emanates from the " Satanic " or the Sunday-School press. No agency is available for resisting this flood so effectively and so responsibly as the public library. I do not know that its right to exercise upon literature the criticism which discriminates art from rubbish is ever disclaimed formally, but it seems often to stand in some doubt. PUBLIC EDUCATION 147 Perhaps the criticism demanded in this case is not distinguished clearly from the presuming and very different censorship that would inspect opinions, and under- take to judge for the public between true and false teaching in religion, or politics, or social economy ; but the two have no principle in common. They differ as the insolence of sumptuary laws differs from the sound reasonableness of laws for the suppression of counterfeits and adultera- tions. If there could be an institution for the purveying of food, or drugs, or any kind of material provision, that should stand in a relation to the public like that of the free library, we would certainly deny its right to a jurisdiction over the demands of the people so far as concerned the kinds and varieties of commodities to be supplied ; but just as certainly we would hold it responsible for the quality of the things it had been instituted to provide. We would reasonably require the institution to be so organized as to 148 PUBLIC LIBRARIES AND embrace within its management the capability to distinguish competent from incompetent work, and genuine from counterfeited products. That is precisely the kind of discrimination to be exercised in public libraries in the matter of this romance literature, which is worth so much as a product of literary art and is so worthless when wanting the touches of art. The question concerning it is al- most purely a question of quality. Where a subtler question arises, — a debatable question of taste, within the range of uncertain canons in which questions of taste are open, — I would not ask to have it arbitrated in a public library. But the great mass of the trash of fiction is not touched by such questions. The dis- cernment of its worthlessness depends on nothing but some familiar acquaintance with good literature, and on the sense of quality which that acquaintance will develop. If public libraries do no more than PUBLIC EDUCATION 149 administer those common verdicts of the literary world that are of authority and weight, they will sweep a mountain of rubbish from their shelves ; they will command from the public a hearing for criticism that will never be secured other- wise, and they will be exercising in a most important particular the educational responsibility that belongs to them. The safe rule under which I should like to see them placed in their dealing with romance is the rule of conservatism — of slowness — of waiting for the judgments and verdicts by which literary work is proved. They are not speculators in the book market ; their interest in literature is not a commercial one, like Mudie's ; they are instituted for a missionary pur- pose, and their business, as I have said, is to bring to bear on the greatest number of people the profitable influences that are in books. Why should they be in haste to catch up the novelties of the romance press, like merchants eager for 150 PUBLIC LIBRARIES AND custom ? Why should they not keep all this doubtful literature waiting at their doors till it has been weighed and pro- nounced upon, not by the public opinion of Tom, Dick and Harry, and the school- girls, and the idle and raw-minded body of readers, but by the instructed public opinion which is the court of last resort for all books, and which determines the ultimate fate of all ? I have not touched the question of morals as affecting this literature, because that is included substantially in the ques- tion of literary quality. In America and England (I say nothing of other coun- tries) the literary taste which prevails and has authority is moral enough, because healthy enough, to be trusted fairly with the whole adjudication. I know of no vicious or unwholesome novel, poem, play, or other imaginative work belong- ing to contemporary literature, that has standing enough in the English-speaking literary world to commend it to a public PUBLIC EDUCATION 151 library, if nothing is considered but the view of it from literary standpoints. Generally, I think, among the Teutonic peoples, the conception of art is essen- tially a moral conception, — the concep- tion of a fundamental purity, — and the more highly the art-sense of these peoples is cultivated the more clear-sighted it be- comes as to the falsity in art of all moral falsity. And so I should feel safe in making it the rule for public libraries of the popular class, that they should admit freely whatever wins a good standing in the literary public opinion of the time, and admit nothing till that standing is assured to it. There is a large body of older litera- ture which requires some different rule. It comes to us from coarse or corrupted periods of the past, when the ethics of literary art were slightly perceived, little felt. In some of it there are all the ad- mirable qualities that imaginative litera- ture produced without moral sensitive- 152 PUBLIC LIBRARIES AND ness can have. It is vigorous, brilliant, graceful. It gained in its own day a lit- erary standing which it could not win in ours ; but we are disposed, and perhaps rightly, to let it stand at the original rating. Historically, as representative literature, it has great importance and interest to those who will use it in that character, as students of literature and history in the thorough-going sense. But I can see no good purpose it can serve in popular libraries, and no reason for its having a place in them. The drama of the Restoration, a great part of the more famous novels of the eighteenth century, with much of the older romance, are examples of what I mean. On what reasonable ground is acquaintance with them popularized at the present day ? Of the kindred literature from other lan- guages that has been imported into the English by translation, I can only ask the same question with more emphasis. I leave large ranges of literature, in PUBLIC EDUCATION 153 which nothing I have said will offer a hint of the bounds I am asking to have set for our popular libraries ; and I am ready to confess with frankness that I do not know where to set the bounds, nor how. Perhaps it is not a practicable thing to do. And yet I am sure the at- tempt should be made to mark out, in all literature, with some rough consistency, the provinces of the popular library, as distinguished from the library of re- search and history, or the museum of books. Not, I say again, to set narrow or parsimonious limitations upon them. It is no petty conception of the popular library that I have formed. For popu- lar uses I want it as great as it can be made. Not for uses of common reading only, but for all uses. I should have looked but a little way into the influence of these libraries if I took account of no more than the set " reading" that they encourage and supply. They have a greater office than that. It is to induce 154 PUBLIC LIBRARIES AND a habit among people of following up the chance topics and questions in which their interest happens from time to time to be stirred by casual circumstances and hints. A school exercise, a newspaper paragraph, an allusion from the pulpit,, a picture, a quotation, a play, will often supply an impulse that carries itself long and far into the intellectual life and growth of our library students, but which, without the help of the public library, would come to naught. Making it com- mon and habitual, in some wide circle of people, to say on such occasions, " I will go to the library and pursue this mat- ter," or " put this statement to the proof,' ' or " learn more of this man " or "of these writings,' ' the public library brings into action more energies of education than can be organized in any college or school. And so, for its greatest efficiency, it needs to be equipped largely, liberally, with resources for every kind of common investigation ; for every kind of investi- PUBLIC EDUCATION 155 gation, I mean, that is not elaborated in professional study, or special scientific research, or minute erudition. For such special quests and profounder pursuits of learning I do not think that the popular library should undertake the providing of books. All the resources it can com- mand will seldom be too great for em- ployment in its own great office, which is to popularize the profitable influence of books. Before everything else it should have these two aims : First, to be abounding in its supply of good literature, within the range of popular use ; second, to be perfect in arrangements for exhibiting its stores and making them accessible, and to be fertile and persistent in devices for winning students and for helping them with all encouraging aids. If the library is stinted anywhere, let it not be in the better books for which there is most of a popular call. Better fifty copies of one book that will get so many readers, than 156 PUBLIC LIBRARIES AND fifty various books which few will use. I am disposed to believe that a popular library should expend its means very grudgingly upon wider acquisitions until it has so multiplied on its shelves the few best books most wanted by its general readers that it will seldom disappoint a call for one of them. I put that forward as the first claim upon its funds ; and next to that I put the employment of adequate methods for exhibiting and advertising its books and their contents and charac- ter to the public. Classification, annota- tion, analysis, in catalogues and bulle- tins, with indexes, reference-lists, helpful hand-books, and bibliographical guides, — these are objects of expenditure more important than the gathering of numer- ous books. A small, well-chosen library, in systematic order, opening every ave- nue to its contents that can be cleared and lighted up by judicious labor, — in- spiring, leading, and helping its studious readers by all the methods which the PUBLIC EDUCATION 157 earnest library workers of this country are learning to employ, — is an agent of education more powerful than the great- est collection can ever become, if the ambition in the latter to have books out- runs the ambition to spread the influ- ence of its books. Both of these ambitions are working, more or less, in the popular libraries of this country ; but the spirit of the time and the race is on the side of the wiser purpose, and it is wonderful to see with what contagion of zeal the dif- fusive work of our public libraries has been animated in late years. It is be- cause I honor so highly the conscience that has been awakened in the work of these libraries, and the power they are acquiring among the institutions of de- mocracy, that I wish to see no waste in their energies. VII SCHOOL-READING VERSUS SCHOOL-TEACHING OF HISTORY SCHOOL-READING VERSUS SCHOOL-TEACHING OF HISTORY 1 If I did not know the fact to be other- wise, I should suppose that a desire for some satisfying knowledge of the past life of mankind, and especially within the range of direct ancestries and inherit- ances, would be one of the keenest crav- ings of every active mind. That it is not so is too obvious to need proof ; and I think that, on reflection, we can under- stand the fact. That which lies near to us and in sunlight will naturally, always, engage our attention more easily and hold it more strongly than that which 1 Read at a meeting of the Buffalo Historical Society, to which teachers of history were invited, May, 1906. 162 SCHOOL-READING is shadowed and remote. The bit of re- cently past time which we call the Present is our sunlighted portion of time, and its subjects and objects of interest are pressed most insistently upon us. To a great extent we are compelled to give them the first place in our thoughts; because our means of subsistence, and therefore our lives, are dependent on things and conditions, not as they have been, but as they are. Our social rela- tions, moreover, our ambitions, our activ- ities of all kinds, are under the same control. Those things and conditions, to be sure, have their roots in the past and their growth out of it ; but the fruits that are ripening from them now are what we have to gather, for the daily provisioning of daily life, and they busy us so that we can easily lose thought of the historic soils and saps from which they came. It is thus, by a thousand imperative needs and interests, that the Present, or what we call so, wins a natural domina- OF HISTORY 163 tion, and may even take the nearly full possession, of our minds. I can under- stand, therefore, how and why the ma- jority of people feel no apparent want of any knowledge beyond that which the morning newspaper supplies, of men and things in the world of the passing day : the practical knowledge that suffices for traffic, speculation, partisan politics, so- cial conversation, and other immediate interests in life. I can understand, too, how and why it is that so many, among the people whose appetite of the brain calls for meats which the reporters of the daily press cannot serve to them, prefer other kinds of knowledge before that of human history, caring more to know how the earth got its structure, or how beasts, birds, and insects acquired their varia- tions, or how plants are best classified, or how the forces in nature are related to each other, than to know something of the experience that the generations of mankind have gone through, in their i6 4 SCHOOL-READING long procession down the ages of the dead ; something of the influences that have played upon them, — the changes in outward circumstance and inward state that they have undergone, — the successions of their tasks, their achieve- ments, their struggles, — out of which have come Humanity as we know it, Life as we live it, Society as we make part of it, the Earth as we, the latest heirs to that human-family estate, find it fitted and furnished for our habitation. I can see all such preference of Science before History to be natural, because it is con- sequent on the overpowering pressure with which present objects and present in- terests are forced upon the attention of our minds. Science in general is a study for the most part of things as the student sees them with his own eyes, — the phe- nomena of his own day, — and it tends, as commerce and society and newspa- pers do, to cultivate habits of mental seclusion within some limited region of OF HISTORY 165 passing time. There is no fault to be found with the preference of that study, choosing the good knowledge of Science before the good knowledge of History ; nor need we blame the more prac- tical choice which rates a necessary knowledge of the existing conditions of life above the interesting knowledge of how those conditions came to be what they are. There is no fault, I say, to be found with such preferences, except where they put History quite out of consideration, as they often seem to do. That goes beyond my understanding; for it is no natural consequence of any- thing that the obtrusive and exacting Present imposes upon us. In saying that the prevalent disposition to put History behind other more obtru- sive matters of knowledge is natural and explainable, I do not mean to imply that it is reasonable, or that Science is of more importance than History, or that the Present holds more of the valuables 166 SCHOOL-READING of life than are stored for us in the re- membered Past. There are no such com- parisons to be made. Present and Past, from the same spinning of time, into the same never-broken thread, woven into the same continuous fabric of human life, have no divisible value to us. Neither can be to us nor signify to us anything independently of the other. The Past has its explanations in the Present, the Present in the Past. Whatever real sub- stance of knowledge we get into our minds, and whatever real substance of satisfaction we get into our lives, must come from both. Mr. Rhodes, the historian, in an excel- lent address which he made on taking the chair of the presidency of the American Historical Association, in 1899, conceded too much, I think, on this point. " The Present," he said, "is more important than the Past, and those sciences which contribute to our comfort, place within reach of the laborer and mechanic as OF HISTORY 167 common necessaries what would have been the highest luxury to the Roman emperor or to the king of the Middle Ages, contribute to health and the pre- servation of life, and, by the develop- ment of railroads, make possible such a gathering as this, — these agencies, we cheerfully admit, outrank our modest enterprise, which, in the words of Herod- otus, is 'to preserve the remembrance of what men have done.' " I cannot agree with this view. I would say, on the con- trary, that History has an underlying and upholding relation to every science and every industry, and cannot, therefore, be outranked by any. We could not even choose our foods for to-day's dinner if we had nothing from the Past of mankind to instruct us concerning the gifts of nature that are eatable and those that are not. That is History, on its simplest side. No man of to-day could even form the conception of a railroad locomotive, and far less construct one, if History had 168 SCHOOL-READING not brought to him the ideas of Watt and Stephenson from a century ago. It is so with everything in the passing day that we do or wish to do, that we obtain or wish to obtain, that we know or wish to know : there is something of History behind it all which we must understand if the doing or obtaining or knowing is to be a possible thing. And it is not alone in those outward ways that the Past comes historically into every present moment. It has more entrance than we are apt to suspect into all the chambers and all the processes of our minds. We do no thinking, we exercise no imagination, we have no emotion, without it. For what is memory but the private historical collection which each man makes for himself ? It may be limited very closely to the annals of his own life, — to the little region of his own doings and experiences ; but even at the narrowest, there will always be some- thing from a larger history that has OF HISTORY 169 crept into it, and which has some kind of vague participation in his feelings and thoughts. Names, at least, that carry some historical meaning, will have got a lodgment in his brain. Washington, Shakspere, Columbus, Caesar, Mara- thon, Magna Charta, the Declaration of Independence, the French Revolution, and other men, movements, and docu- ments of the Past, will figure, in some dim way, in his beliefs, and in the general notions that run through all the workings of his mind. Try to conceive, if you can, the state of a human consciousness in which absolutely nothing of such histor- ical idea-stuff is contained ; then, perhaps, you can realize how much the more or less of it has to do with the measure and quality of our lives. The historical memory, in fact, is like an atmosphere in our mental world, making it spatial, put- ting distance, perspective, scenery into it, by refractions and diffusions of our con- sciousness, which otherwise would be like 170 SCHOOL-READING the flash on flash of straight sun-rays to an eye looking out from the airless moon, which could never see aught but the sun itself. Without its importation of some- thing from the long Past into the sensa- tions of the momentary present, our lives would be like the journey of a traveler through dark tunnels underground. To think of this is to recognize the absolute emptiness of those current in- stants of time which we call the Present, except as we bring furniture to them by importation from the Past, in private stores that are Memory or in public stores that are History. We not only borrow from the days that are gone every power that enables us to extort the practical necessities of life from this present day, but we go to them for everything that lends interest to the passing days of our lives. This is the great fact which puts historical knowledge, in my esteem, above all other matters of knowledge that man can seek. By enrichment OF HISTORY 171 of his consciousness it enriches every- thing that is interesting in his life. The realm of his mind is narrow or large in its resources of interest, according to the radius of its historical horizon and its scenic vision of general human life. His- torical knowledge is needed, therefore, for all minds, as the indispensable furni- 1/ ture of a satisfying mental life. The man of science and the man of business can give room to it, not only with no detriment to the specialized occupations of their thought, but with gains of animation and enlargement that could come, I am sure, from nothing else. It is the one kind of knowledge which, more than any other, is expansive in its whole effect ; which resists the monotonizing of interests and the narrowing of views. " Histo- ries," says Bacon, in his pregnant essay on "Studies," — "histories make men wise," and he gave them the first place in all that he commends. These, to me, are the all-sufficient 1 72 SCHOOL-READING reasons for an early and long and large use of History in educational work. The more specific pleas for it, urged com- monly : that it exercises the judgment and the imagination, — that it is full of ethical lessons and instructive examples of character, — that it will cultivate pa- triotism, and the like, — are not so strong. They are all true ; there is sound argu- ment in them all ; but they are all tran- scended by the fact that, in the nature of the human mind, its very capacity for any knowledge, and its pleasure in any, are dependent on the spatial and per- spective conditions imparted to it by its own historian, the Memory. More or less of History it must carry among its con- tents, in order to be at all an intelligent mind. For its richest and best endow- ment of power to do and to enjoy, in any field of human endeavor, it cannot be freighted with too much. What, then, can be more important in education than the use of means and OF HISTORY 173 efforts to overcome those strenuous pres- sures and influences which tend naturally to hold the attention of people too closely to things of the passing day, blinding them to the wonderful landscapes of the historic Past, and depriving them of its immeasurable enrichment of the life of the mind? Until recent years History had no well-recognized place in common or general schemes of education. Now it is winning a fairly acknowledged foot- ing in our elementary and secondary schools, but only by hard contention and competition with studies that offer, as it seems to me, no comparable gifts of cul- ture or power. The claims for it are still too low. Its place should not be in the ruck of an overcrowded curriculum, but clear in the van of preferred subjects, through all grades from the middle, at least, of every elementary course. I ven- ture to predict that the consideration it is beginning to receive will soon give it an unquestioned title to that place. Fur- u- 174 SCHOOL-READING thermore, I shall venture to submit some speculations of thought that I have indulged myself in, concerning a school treatment of History which might pos- sibly be more effectual than the modes of treatment now pursued. I am not a teacher ; I have done no teaching at any time of my life ; and I should be guilty of great presumption if I spoke with dog- matism on the subject ; but I think there can be no impropriety in a plain state- ment of my thought to those who can give it consideration from the teacher's point of view. I assume that the general purpose and aim of the work done in our school-rooms is not to stock the minds of the young with a provision of knowledge, in any department, that will suffice them for their lives ; but rather to introduce them to knowledge, — prepare them to be re- ceptive of it, — acquaint them with its attractions and its uses, — put them in the way of pursuing the acquisition of it OF HISTORY 175 through later life, and familiarize them with the paths of that pursuit. This must be so in the matter of History, if in nothing else. No intelligent teachers of History will think that they have given as much of it to their classes as can be for the pupils' good. On the other hand, no teachers will work with an eye to the turning out of whole classes of profes- sional historians, trained for exhaustive research, and destined to devote their lives to the study and original construc- tion of history from its sources in public and private depositories of important fact. For one in a thousand, perhaps, the instruction fitted to that end might be given profitably ; but it would not be of profit to the remaining nine hundred and ninety-nine. The service of the school to them in this matter must simply be such as to make them lovers of the literature of History, — lovers, that is, of History as a finished product of trained research and judgment and literary art. In a word, 176 SCHOOL-READING I would say that the office of the school in its educational use of History is to evoke the appetite for historical reading, and to prepare judgment and taste for a right choice of writers and books. Is this office performed in the best possible way by any method of teaching History now employed in our schools ? I have been led to serious doubts on that point ; and my doubts have gone so far as to question whether the results I have indicated can be attained satisfactorily by any treatment of History that would be describable as " teaching," in the cus- tomary use of the word. I have read many excellent papers on such methods, written by wise and earnest teachers, of great experience ; and the fine thought and spirit in most of them have impressed me very much ; but at the base of them all, I find more or less of a catechising requirement which cannot, as I would judge, be favorable to the reading-inter- est and habit that we wish to create. It OF HISTORY 177 involves a piece-meal treatment of the details in an historical narrative, which breaks the continuity of impression from them on the pupil's mind. But most of that allured and prolonged attention which we call "interest" depends on this very continuity of impressions which such treatment breaks up. For History is, essentially, a story, and my feeling is that it must not be spoiled as a story by anything done to it in the schools. What- ever it carries, of political, moral, and other meanings and teachings, is carried in the current of its story, not, I am sure, to be fished out with question-hooks, but to be borne fluently into the mind, with the stream, which will create for it a wel- coming thirst. What I wish to argue for, therefore, is the simple reading of History in schools, with no analytical teaching, questioning, or periodical examination, to break the thread of the tale which the school or the class pursues. Of course it should be 178 SCHOOL-READING systematic reading, under the lead of a capable teacher, whose accompanying comments may emphasize, explain, illu- minate, and illustrate, here and there, ^ according to need ; but, as nearly as possible, it ought, I think, to preserve the effect which a mind experiences in taking information to itself, by its own volition and its own absorption, from a printed page. Leave the matter of the reading to have what fate it will in various minds ! Trust all immediate results to the ultimate result! What if the daily leakage from young minds is large, provided we are opening inlets to them from springs in later years that will never run dry ! Let us remember the stream- likeness of this story of the Past, and allow it to trickle its course through such irrigating brain-channels as it finds, with no incessant casting of lead-lines to test its depth ! It is not in this matter as it is with the little cisterns of Arithmetic and Grammar and Geography that we try to OF HISTORY 179 fill, once for all, in the brain. There the quizzing plummet and the examination dredge have their proper use. Here we are introducing something very different, for a very different action and agency ; something to be for a general diffusion, expansion, refreshment, and stimulation of all consciousness, all feeling, all im- agination, all thought. Then why not give it free play, meddling as little as possible with its natural flow and with the natural deposits it will leave ? In my thought of this treatment of History, in elementary and secondary schools, the scheme of it would be some- thing like this : 1. An underlying use of such readable text-books of abbreviated History as can be found ; such text-books as are not mere packages of assorted fact, but which give a fluent showing of the main move- ments of events, with a moderate amount of detail. These to be carriers, as it were, of the historical narrative through its 180 SCHOOL-READING less important parts, where they suffice to keep interest alive or to make the connection with coming incidents under- stood. 2. The bringing in of passages and chapters from the classic and standard works of historical literature at all points in the narrative where a broader and more vivid treatment can be introduced with marked effect. 3. A judicious accompaniment of com- ment and explanation by the directing teacher, restrained carefully to avoid much diversion of mind from the reading itself. For example, if I planned an experiment in this treatment of History with a class of young people, I would take such a book as might easily be made out of Freeman's " General Sketch of European History" and use it for the threading of careful selections from the best historical litera- ture within its field. It is a book that needs revision of its first two chapters, OF HISTORY 181 to bring into it later views and revelations in ethnology and Greek archaeology ; otherwise it seems to me to be excellent in its adaptation to such a use. It could introduce bits of reading, in the first in- stance, from the Iliad and from some of the Greek hero-myths, in connection with extracts from popular accounts of the explorations at Troy, Mycenae, and in Crete, which throw light on their sources in historical fact. For a first reading in Greek history, Freeman's sketch gives enough of the origin and general course of the Persian wars ; but the stories of Marathon, Thermopylae, and Salamis should be read in Herodotus, or in Plutarch's Miltiades or Themistocles, or in both. Then I would carry the read- ing to those short sections of the first book of Thucydides (89 to 99) in which he tells in his plain way " how the Athe- nians attained the positions in which they rose to greatness " after the destruction of their city in the last of the Persian 182 SCHOOL-READING wars ; how they formed the Confederacy of Delos and took the leadership of it ; how they abused their domination, made subjects of their allies, and so aroused the hostilities and jealousies that brought ruin upon them in the ensuing Pelopon- nesian War. To this I would add the later part of Plutarch's life of Aristides, which tells of the strengthening of de- mocracy at Athens at the end of the Per- sian wars and gives further particulars of the formation of the Delian Confeder- acy ; and I would draw yet more from Plutarch by liberal extracts from his lives of Themistocles and Pericles. To deepen and widen the impression from this, the great period in Greek history, I know of nothing better to be brought to a young class than may be found in chapters XVI and XVII of Evelyn Abbott's book -on " Pericles and the Golden Age of Athens." I am not sure that Freeman's slight sketch of the Peloponnesian War would need any enlargement; but something OF HISTORY 183 from Thucydides and Xenophon, and from Plutarch's Alcibiades and Lysander, might supplement it interestingly and with profit. As for the period between the Peloponnesian War and the intrusion of Philip of Macedon into Greek affairs, there seems to be little call for going beyond Freeman's brief account. On coming to the Macedonian epoch it would undoubtedly be desirable to in- terest our young readers somewhat more, not only in the extraordinary conquests of Alexander, but in the preparatory work of Philip, his father, who was the abler and greater man of the two. My sug- gestion would be to take something in the first instance, for that purpose, from Plutarch's Demosthenes, and a few pages from the 66th and 67th of Niebuhr's " Lectures on Ancient History," where both Philip and his great Athenian op- ponent are estimated with much fairness of view. Concerning the immeasurable importance of Alexander's heroic career, 184 SCHOOL-READING in its effects upon subsequent history, there is no room for two opinions ; but historians have differed so widely in their estimates of the hero that young readers should be acquainted, I think, with the opposing views. Thirlwall admires him and credits him largely with the great results that came from what he did. Grote does not. Perhaps there could be selections from each. After the death of Alexander, I judge that Freeman has told all that can be made interesting or in- structive to the average school-boy or school-girl, down to the time when Greek history is merged in that of Rome. Turning, then, to the latter, I would plan a similar course, in which Freeman should furnish the links of connection between readings from Livy, Plutarch, Polybius, Caesar, Tacitus, Mommsen, Merivale, Gibbon, and many more. If half an hour daily could be given to such readings, during seven or eight years of the period spent by a pupil OF HISTORY 185 in graded school and high school, they would not only carry him, I judge, over very wide ranges of general history, and into familiarizing and appetizing touch with its best literature, but ample time would remain, I am sure, for repetitions and enlargements of the more important parts of the tour. Possibly in such repe- titions, traversing English and American history for the second time, more leisurely and with more nearly ripened minds, there might be something of the step-by- step " teaching " introduced with advan- tage. It might then be possible to scru- tinize, analyze, correlate, and otherwise discuss events and incidents one by one, without destroying interest in the his- torical movement to which they belong ; but I cannot believe that a first reading of history should be broken in any such way. I cannot believe that a tape-meas- urement of " lessons " in it, with a halt for quizzing at each mark on the tape, is as educational in this matter as a free 186 SCHOOL-READING excursion would be. I cannot believe that History will waken the feeling that it ought to excite in the mind of a young student, if it is thrust upon him in a dry compend, which he must glue his un- willing eyes to, while remembering al- ways that the trigger of an examination trap may be lurking in every name, date, and circumstance that it holds. For His- tory, if for nothing else that the school gives him, I would ease him of that dread, and make him free to experience pleasure and desire. I would make him his own examiner, by requiring him, at intervals, to write a summary in his own language of what he has gathered from the last week or fortnight of the readings. There is no other process of durable memorizing that equals that ; and I be- lieve it could be trusted, in connection with such readings as I suggest, to yield better results than are coming from the catechized "study" of History now pur- sued in our schools. OF HISTORY 187 I know the hazard of my venture in theorizing without practical experience, and I am prepared to have it shown to me that my suggestions are impracti- cable, or that, if practicable, they would not answer my expectations in the result. If experience so adjudges them, I only ask to be told why. <3Ci>e tftitarpibe pre?? Electroty fed and printed by H . O. Houghton &* Co. Cambridge, Mass., U.S.A. SE? OT 19°* 1YC f r 71 * ^ , L* \ s4~*7