31^'«! - Jl* *■ . v ■", -If 1 T t t jr* to ^ fir-. \. 4» 1 - .f Vr,'3rti -^vOv Qi^C t-lM, /> v^^' ^rv 'J' *J« ^0 \^ '^ v-A- A- ,'.'i' .^%, ■ C' V 0^ c '>''''■ <■ ^ . S '\ VJ ' ^ V. ^ . (J ''^ .'. s'^ ■ V\ ". -> ^ Xs^ „xx^ ■'>. ^^ %.-^yi^ 'C' # .v^' '^.. '. 's t^ -^ «. -^ o 0" '^, .-'V ^,\ .:% x'^^" -S fl.S 12; ■a '-'.2 IN m 02 a ■3 a 1 1 O o 12; 1 > m a o . a) MS ill si" fao a c.S M gag iH-r)_Q 3 3 < a o a Eh O (5 !2; CI .5 a ??« O z z ill !; « C oj « 1° c a . [it ^ S i c §22 "am"' cS 03 ^ !=• 1 III ^■^" c .S S i- oi E C " g 03 *ii .3 «r3 03 3-s g^ is O z o K 3l gs.a <« fi fl.S 03 f-i P* ^ a)J2 .a .'^ a Ci -p t 3.2 . a).p §2 tH a 1 1 -2 a -2 a 5 0} 1 ^ c3 "a « o aj m ^ « g S D._a) '3^ 's S 3 e i h "^ " till ^11 ,^ f4 > ^ t-, crt i'^ hJ t^ 0) -(-> & c .S "^ w) 5 t3 4) a ^ +i xn a; C be a G T3 a> Oi > fe -3 ri t^ rO -S +2 &, - '^ ra > m S ^ w .s « ^ § w ^ CO ^ (U u a fl, FOREST PROTECTION 39 REFERENCE LIST Compiled by F. D. Cotjden and C. A. Schence The following pages will refer the student to publications, most of which should be in the library of the up-to-date forester, where accounts, more or less complete, of certain species of insects injurious to forest and shade trees may be found. The list is by no means complete, and it is very likely that a few even of the important species have been omitted. The study of Forest Entomology is still in its infancy; but the literature, whHe not yet voluminous, is so scattered thut it would not be profitable for the pre- sent purpose to go through it with a fine-toothed comb. A great many errors wUl undoubtedly be noticed by Entomologists, particularly as to synonymy; but it is hoped, nevertheless, that the list wUl be of some value to the students of Forestry for whom it is designed. The arrangement is faulty in that many polyphagous species of msects are not listed under all of their host trees. Porthetria dispar, for instance, is listed only xmder Quercus, whereas the caterpillars of the Gipsy Moth feed indiscriminately on the foilage of almost any tree within their range. The use of the "index," however, will enable the student to find the refer- ences to any insect listed, without regard to the host under which the re- ference is given. Here follow the complete titles of all the publications used in the pre- paration of the list. The abbreviations used in the list proper are printed here in Black-Faced Type, and are followed by the titles, names of authors' and years of publication. UNITED STATES PUBLICATIONS 5th Rept. Ent. Com. U. S. Fifth Report of the United States Entomolog- ical Commission. Insects injurious to forest and shade trees. By A. S. Packard. 1890. Ag. Yr. Bk. for 1895 U. S.— Yearbook of the United States Department ' of Agriculture for 1895. The Shade Tree insect problem in the eastern United States. By L. O. Howard, pp. 361-384. 1896. Ag. Yr. Bk. for 1902 U. S.— Yearbook of the United States Department of Agriculture for 1902. Some of the principal insect enemies of coni- ferous forests in the United States. By A. D. Hopkins, pp. 265-282. 1903. Ag. Yr. Bk. for 1903 U. S.— Yearbook of the United States Department of Agriculture for 1903. Insects injurious to hardwood forest trees. By A. D. Hopkins, pp. 313-328. 1904. Ag. Yr. Bk. for 1904 U. S.— Yearbook of the United States Department of Agriculture for 1904. Insect injiiries to forest products. By A. D. Hopkins, pp. 381-398. The nut weevils. By F. H. Chittenden, pp. 299-310. 1905. 40 FOREST PROTECTION Ag. Yr. Bk. for 1905 U. S. — Yearbook of the United States Department of Agriculture for 1905. Insect enemies of forest reproduction. By A. D. Hopkins, pp. i-iii and 249-256. 1906. Ag. Yr. Bk. for 1907 U. S. — Yearbook of the United States Department of Agriculture for 1907. Notable depredations by forest insects. By A. D. Hopkins, pp. i-iii and 149-164. 1908. Bulletins of the Bureau (Formerly Division) op Entomology, United States Department of Agriculture. Ent. Bui. No. 7 U. S. — Some miscellaneous results of the work of the Di- vision of Entomology. The ambrosia beetles of the United States. By H. G. Hubbard, pp. 9-30. Insect injuries to chestnut and pine trees in Virginia and neighboring states. By F. H. Chittenden, pp. 67-75. 1897. Ent. Bui. No. 14 U. S.— The Periodical Cicada. By C. L. Marlatt. 1898. Ent. Bui. No. 21 U. S.— Preliminary report on the insect enemies of forests in the Northwest. By A. D. Hopkins. 1899. Ent. Bui. No. 28 U. S. — Insect enemies of the spruce in the Northwest. By A. D. Hopkins. 1901. Ent. Bui. No. 32 U. S. — Insect enemies of pine in the Black Hills. By A. D. Hopkins. 1902. Ent. Bui. No. 37 U. S. — Proceedings of the fourteenth annual meeting of the Association of Economic Entomologists. On the study of forest entomology in America. By A. D. Hopkins, pp. 5-32. 1902. Ent. Bui. No. 38 U. S. — Some miscellaneous results of the work of the Di- vision of Entomology. Notes on the Rhinocerus Beetle. By F. H. Chittenden, pp. 28-32. 1902. Ent. Bui. No. 48 U. S. — Catalogue of exhibits of insect enemies of forest products at the Louisiana Purchase Exposition, St. Louis, Mo., 1904. By A. D. Hopkins. 1904. Ent. Bui. No. 53 U. S. — Catalogue of the exhibit of Economic Entomology at the Lewis and Clrak Centennial Exposition, Portland, Oregon, 1905. By Rolla P. Currie. 1904. Ent. Bui. No. 56 U. S.— The Black Hills Beetle. By A. D. Hopkins. 1905. Ent. Bui. No. 58 U. S. — Some insects injurious to forests. Parts I, II, and III. By A. D. Hopkins and J. L. Webb. 1906-07. Ent. Bui. No. 71 U. S.— The Periodical Cicada. By C. L. Martlatt. 1907. Circulars of the Bureau (Formerly Division) of Entomology of the United States Department of Agriculture. Ent. Cir. No. 24 U. S.— The Two-lined Chestnut Borer. By F. H. Chitten- den. 1897. Ent. Cir. No. 29 U. S.— The Fruit-tree Bark-beetle. By F. H. Chittenden- 1898. FORESTIPROTECTION 41 Ent. Cir. No. 55 U. S. — Powder-post injury to seasoned wood products. By F. H. Chittenden. 1903. Ent. Cir. No. 82 U. S. — Pinhole injury to girdled cypress in the South At- lantic and Gulf States. By A. D. Hopkins. 1907. Ent. Cir. No. 83 U. S. — The Locust Borer, and methods for its control. By A. D. Hopkins. 1907. Ent. Cir. No. 90 U. S.— The White-pine Weevil. By A. D. Hopkins. 1907, Ent. Cir. No. 96 U. S.— The Catalpa Sphinx. By L. O. Howard and F. H. Chittenden. 1907. Ent. Cir. No. 97 U. S.— The Bagworm. By L. O. Howard and F. H. Chit- tenden. 1908. Bulletins op the Forest Service (Formerly Bureau op Forestry) OP THE United States Department op Agriculture. For. Bui. No. 22 U. S. — The White Pine. Insect enemies of . By F. H. Chittenden, pp. 55-61. 1899. For. Bui. No. 31 U. S.— The Western Hemlock. Insects of the . By A. D. Hopkins, pp. 16-21. 1902. For, Bui. No. 38 U. S.— The Redwood. Insects of the . By A. D, Hopkms. pp. 32-40. 1903. For. Bui. No. 46 U. S. — The Basket Willow. Insects injurious to . By F. H. Chittenden, pp. 63-80. 1904. Other Publications op the United States Department op Agriculture. Far. Bui. No. 99 U. S. — Farmer's Bulletin No. 99. Three insect enemies of shade trees. By L. O. Howard. 1899. Far. Bui. No. 264 U. S.— Farmer's Bulletin No. 264. The Brown-tail Moth, and how to control it. By L. O. Howard. 1906. Far. Bui. No. 265 U. S.— Farmer's Bulletin No. 265. The Gipsy Moth, and how to control it. By L. O. Howard. 1907. F'ld. Pr'g'm. F'st. S'ce.-April, 1907, U. S.— Field Programme of the Forest Service for April, 1907. STATE PUBLICATIONS. New Jersey. Geol. Rept. for 1889. N. J. — Annual Report of the State Geologist of New Jersey for the year 1899. Part III. Report on Forests. The role of insects in the forest. By J. B. Smith, pp. 205-232. 1899. New York. G'de. L'fl't. No. 16 A. M. N. H.— Guide Leaflet No. 16, American Museum of Natural History. The insect galls of the vicinity of New York City_ By William Beutenmuller. 1904. Ex. Sta. Bui. No. 233 Cornell. — Cornell University. Agricultural Experi- ment Station of the College of Agriculture. Bulletin No. 233. De- partment of Entomology. Saw-fly leaf-miners on European elms and alders. By M. V. Slingerland. 1905. 42 FOREST PROTECTION Ex. Sta. Bui, No. 234 Cornell. — Cornell University. Agriciiltural Experi- ment Station of the College of Agriculture. Bulletin No. 234. De- partment of Entomology. The Bronze Birch-borer. By M. V. Slinger- land. 1906. For. Rept. No. 4 N. Y. — Fourth annual report of the Commissioners of Fish- eries, Game, and Forests of the State of New York. Report for 1898. Insects injurious to maple trees. By E. P. Felt. pp. 367-395. 1899. For. Rept, No. 7 N. Y. — Seventh annual report of the Forest, Fish, and Game Commission of the State of New York. Report for 1901. Insects affectmg forest trees. By E. P. Felt. pp. 479-534. 1902. St. Mus. Bui, No, 53 N, Y.— New York State Museum Bulletin No. 53. (En- tomology 14). 17th Report of the State Entomologist on injurioiis and other insects of the State of New York. By E. P. Felt. 1901, St. Mus. Bui. No. 103 N. Y.— New York State Museum Bulletin No. 103. (Entomology 25). The Gipsy and Brown-tail Moths. By E. P. Felt. 1906. St. Mus. Bui. No, 109 N, Y,— New York State Museum Bulletin No. 109. (Entomology 27). White-marked Tussock-moth and Elm Leaf-beetle. By E. P. Felt. 1907. St. Mus. Bui. No. 110 N. Y.— New York State Museum Bulletin No. 110. (Entomology 28). 22nd Report of the State Entomologist on injur- ious and other insects of the state of New York. By E. P. Felt. 1907 St, Mus, Mem. No. 8 N. Y. — New York State Museum Memoir 8. 2 vol- umes. Insects affecting park and woodland trees. By E. P. Felt. 1905-06. Ohio. Ins. Bui. No. 7 Ohio, — Ohio Department of Agriculture. Division of Nur- sery and Orchard Inspection. Bulletin No. 7. The insects affecting the black locust and hardy catalpa. By E. C. Cotton. 1905. Pennsylvania. For. Rept. 1901-02 Penn. — Statement of work done by the Pennsylvania Department of Forestry during 1901 and 1902. 1902. West Virginia. Ex. Sta. Bui. No. 35 W. Va.— Bulletin of the West Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station No. 35. Defects in wood caused by insects. By A. D. Hopkins. 1894. Ex. Sta. Bui. No. 56 W, Va.— Bulletin of the West Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station No. 56. Report on investigations to determine the cause of imhealthy conditions of the spruce and pine from 1880 to 1893. By A. D. Hopkins. 1899. MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS. Comstock's Manual.- — Manual for the Study of Insects. By J. H. Com- stock. 1895. Ratzeburg Vol. III. — Die Forst-Insecten, volume III. By J. C. Ratzeburg. Berlin, 1844. The Forester for 1901. — The Forester. A periodical published by the Amer- ican Forestry Association at Washington, D. C. Oo>ai S o . W'^^ w^^ .>< Wo • 31M . sa^ 3> • a) « . , =0 2 e o « 03 " "^ ^ s S~.2 5 QgsflC^jCtjtj^ O. J I s t 050 S O S CO CO CO s s s , -- , , , ^ S K t- i.. to "^ r^rir^^ ?■ 2 'S.'S-S'.S'ft, S fe S 43 44 FOREST PROTECTION -Mr- «o . 1 1 1 1 1 1 "en 00 l O lUrt tH02 2 £ a I IrH 1 1 1 t 1 1 i(M 1 1 r 1 r E .2o^ pqcooQ I 1 1 I 1 !.-( I rfl r1^^ 1 1 1 1 . I(N 1 ctf w fl ^ .2 SCO . fq"2t/2 ] ] t>t> H>t^I> i|> Xi W V-iH 32 . ^ ■* , , , o . «o ^12; !z: CO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CQ ■^V mo . "o)or3 (M 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 to 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 <'". 2Sa : (N 1 1 1 1 1 1 . f^t^< .^3 S-Soj 1 5=1 S-^^ >0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ^O u 1 IM 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 fe^o cs'io cS S'^> o o 1 1 1 ] 1 1 1 1 m 1 1 1 1 1 J 1 1 ^ ■* 03 rt CO • di-! lO P5 fa |M sr* ■ « pqWoQ 1 O -p Oh-; 1 O) 1 1 1 1 1 1 p Eh t3 H • 3S • CQMor; I 1 ' 'ill' 1 1 ICO 1 1 1 1 1 W __; 3t^ . fpMcQ J 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +3 Ot~; ; (N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H ^ 3M . (Q'^m Cm OS ^ ©►_; to" ^ ■* •>* (N IM (M (N CO t^ OI>t^l^t>t-t~l> 3oo . CO (N NO>O5t^t~tOt>00 ^a ^o«? CO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ^i^ 05 to 1 : 1 : ! : ; : Sh : ! ! ; ! 1 1 ! e; m M e « 1 1 T 1 ) 1 1 1 K H -<; fc, 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ^g m DDOJiDy'aiaJO CQ o OOOOPOOO m wmmmHCQimm 1 1 1 C 1 1 1 1 1 1 '. ' a ' ' > < ' o a j° 1 W 1 cji-l 1 1 W ' s ig „ 1 1 ^ '-2 ''«S i i a< ■ts ^ ' S ' s s ' ' CQ c § ;-s "^-S ' ' 1 s S- 2 O'-S 1 S- a S ""-o "-s § "^ «> H O s J J ' 1 » « » 1 II ; I'lgg 1 g ■22 as^^i'l 1 t3 o glllllti -w-a § o o tj o-« j_ B ] (H Ti 1 t3 t «' a JS •o i. 1 u • e> o -x a 1 1 O^ CO 1 S 0) ^00^- ID O . 1^^ 1 1 1 1 1 ilO 1 1 1 1 1 iM 4^ m -«V mo . ^05tB (N 1 CO 1 1 1 1 1 1 » pqWoQ i(N Iw ! 1 r ^ 1 1 11! ctf H a 3w . ctf (n"5cQ ' 1 b ■ ^ Q. * 1 T)< —1 Tt< --( CO 1 2 H>Ot^t^l> 1 3 • a 1 "S 1 1 "* 1 • Q • COS -OStOOO 1 1 ^ IM rt rt .-^ 1 S 1,1,1, tf^^ 1 1 1 1 1 ICO o -♦-» 5«^ 1 1 1 1 1 1 >— 1 I> 4> Sw ; ; ! ; g ; g s (1 i i i i°^ i°« Q) Qj gj 03 0) gj ^ IB "o "o "o "o "o "o "o pqCQfflfflWMW 1 1 C 1 1 1 1 1 Bill ■^ 1 Cj 1 1 1 0. 1 S ! ■' ! 05 O 1 w Lc H W '■ s ij: I Q o ■a 1 " 1 a 1 !H& m 5 § a_» c-s a m "^ «' "^ i § ! i » s s ? 1 t) K SS ?i ftj o 1 1 a 5 S a:S J ^ o t. !~ S> ST N- U.U :-13 O O >• i lj ai S 2 ■< |2< S CO 46 fy . . 1 1 llA . . . 1 O . J^*^ ' m :a^ fQO . 1 I I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I ■ 1 1 1 ^05 02 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 r .11(1... . Mb 00 CO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 <2. SCO . fQ"=a3 1 1 1 1 l_ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1^'^ ' 1 1 1 lis 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 ! 1 ! ^'rH pQO . II 1 1 ) t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 T^OTCQ II 1 1 1 t 1 1 t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ^^^ mC^ 1 IIM CI (M 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i;ocOCO II 0 ilO 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , Hot, 1 1 |(N i(M 1 1 I 1 1 1 t^£ M !-r^ fc< il>o HhOcP 1 1 1 Irt 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 S a 1 1 1 i(N 1 1 1 ! ! 1 1 ! 1 ! ! 05 fa[iH< o , , 1 , o Oi ^1— 1 1 1 1 lie 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 !! 1 1 1 ! 1 1 Oi m 1 1 1 lb- 1 1 1 1 1 i. 1 1 1 i(M t 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 "o m ^- o P5 ; >. « «^a) , .11.111 1 1 , 1 1 . 1 1 . 1 1 ^ » t3 ' 1 t 1 1 1 1 iCp 1 1 1 1 1 (U __j u S'^ . {« fq CO !■* iO-*rtO !■* 1IM.-4IM-H' iCOCOCO" 00 o a, t^ t^ l> Ot>Ot^ l> t^|>l>t^ t^I>t^ t^ pq'i'aj 1 ^ : 1 ^ 1 ^- m ■ti o'l-; ^ 00-* 00 iTtifficfo 105 it^««DCO lOOOO - CO 3 (M TH^rt rtfi-l-^i-H 1-H ■-Hi-HT-lrH rt rH I> CS8S» ft-S -^ ~ •» -^ o o o S O Q d Q C) Cl Q osteite ft, 0,0, ft, Q,&,&,e-,E«, cJ 1 ss \ j ■o w >J ■^ s % 1 .o •O 73 s 1 Ce4 1 i- U CO 0< 1 47 o 'o o d Ph Ph* Pin a u 'bi) 3 d o « bJO a ^U5 MO W'^^ MO iCOCO-*-*CO I lO *0 "^ »OCC) I iM Oi ■* (M -^ lO I 00 00 CO CO 03 0 ICCfHCOrOOO iiM i-i O i-h (M --i it~ it> H>t^ 11^ 1 1^ t^ t> t> t> t^ o'o"o o "3 "o "o "o "o "o "o cqmmwpamcqpq 01 3) u a> 'o'o'o'o eqwmeq .:;; — JS a "o'o'o cQmfQ .E;^ 0) QJ D OJ OJ G) i.Xr ^.H? a> "U O QJ ^-§i^gsau J s e J S s s ' §155 e o o § s's. ^ '^ L _^ f*. r\ ^TS • -» O CO ; iS 1 J S o ; ^'^'^^ .2 S § o ,, »• S- & 2 e e Kj c« iilll BS 3 o^ 3 s g ^ o S s s-« gq K s ss e-S »!3>S § g QCj q C! a: CL, Q, E-, &s E-( 6^ E^ S^ > >. w ^ ^ .2 rt^OQ mm -JS 05 0> 1 W rHi-H ia . u ;So«? i IM 1 1 o ' 0\ 1 1 t^ 1 1 •^ I 1 1 'G C5 ' 1 j i i i B P '4 _2 02 ■q a> m CQCPH bO 1 1 1 oj 1 I J 1 1 o 1 1 oj (^ a I li^ O 5 02 « ii g«.g c~^ "S a s » » I s s e s .« o c ; 2; a O O CO H o o 3 O !- S-c e "B-^ S> ■s :^ (- « 1 ti 12 « § to •a n 50 (0 8 1 K « t3 v5o . *i d>-; i : : i i 1 : i "5 ! i i ; i i i i i i i ; ! ! i : i i i i : ! ! 1 ' 1 1 ! 1 1 ! 1 lo i 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 i 1 ' 1 > ! 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IIO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 , 1 ,(N 1 1 1 II ojiO 03 1 1 1 1 1 II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 U5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1111 05 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 i(N 1 1 1 cjto Oj 1 1 1 lO> 1 1 1 iiO 1 1 1 IIM 1 1 o •SI • 1 noo>o>o 1 1 1 icqos 1 1 1 1 1© 1 1 1 1 ITfCOTlfTfl 1 1 1 ITllTjl 1 1 I 1 llO 1 1 1 1 lOJCM-*-* 1 1 1 I'i'co 1 1 1 1 icq 1 1 1 fck 1 ITjIlN 1 1 iffiOi 1 1 iTHTjt 1 Tfl CD lO ICDCD liOI> 1 ICO I05'0^^ llO 1 ICD —1 100 lT- 1 1 1 icq i ; ; : 1 1 iiO CD 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -t-> CO T-lOO® 1 CO t^«2tD 1 locoroco 1 lie CD 05 CO lOi lOS 1 1 i-H 1 1 ICD iiOCOi-l lOl 1 1 1 1 100 it^iOlO ICD 1 lOS ICO ICO 1 1 ICO 1 1 iCO iCOCOCO iCO i i(N Ph M a> 3ro . +i 6,-; CO 00 C0«5Mr-CD CCX) 05 0S CO 00 a> e>CN IIM 1 IT-IO lOO'-KMrH 1 1^ 1 IrH 1 I>00 00 OOt^ 0000000000 00 00 3x . COMCOCOCO 03 05 coco C<1 CO ■*CO^CO 1 iiOiO I-^'^IOCDIO 1 no 1 ICO 1 (N(N-*C^ (M^ C 1 ICO i CO cooq 1 , II 100 00 1 nOlMrt 1 1 IGO 1 nO'^ 1 ICO CO ICS-*" 11^ I01IM--I 1 1 Irt 1 ir-l(M 1 1— IrH lOJlM 100 loot^oo 1 1 it^ 1 it-t- 1 ii>i> ir^co ICO C n g - S D O © O CJ o "o'c'c'o'o 'o'o KP3 o ! ! 1 ! 1 ! ! 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 61 1 1 1 1 1 I : ! : ! i ! ; ; i ; i i ; !"^ ; : : i i ; ; ; 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 ; ; |H . . . ; . , c/; en 1 1 ,' J 1 1 1 cc IS 1 QQ 1 i<^ 1 1 1 1 1 ^fctfcfl Q) (2^ ^1 OJ © Q> ojbflfeD {u_W) aj 1 a) 0) a> OJ © Q) $ ? "3 "o "3 "o "3 "c "3 $ $'o $"0 l'3'o o'o'o'o HHffiMMKK««HH«eHffl=^«PQP3m«« 00 o m 1 1 1 1 >> mil ■ij -i 1 CJ \^B^.^ -\Z :^ ;« !^^ ; iS§ : i dilllldfeldlciiKdlldl dB< 8J •a 'I a 1 1 s a a •s "2 a o "3 Qj u; u.> (u Of O' -4 o o (J '2 d 4} a Ph* OS u P4 o 4) bX) S Q a ^ 03 O 1 1 1 > 1 1 1 1 lO 1^^ 11 1 I'-O 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IM ^ OQ :^t- fflo • "05M .CO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 <^ ^ C.^ • 1 ! 1 ' 1 1 J 1 iio fe!^^ 1 I r 1 1 1 1 1 Id 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1^ o m fa ■ "■ t- a .- - 5 1^ • K m .02 ^' 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 lOD S s " i^^ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i£1 H >3 ■=r-» m^'M 1 1 1 1 1-M-H 1 1 Irt +a Oh-; 1 1 1 1 iClOl 1 1 i£1 W ^ 3t- . pqcocc 1 ! !lM 1 1 ! 1 ! 1 1 -p Oh-; 1 1 lO) . 1 i 1 1 1 1 H • "Bco . fq^'^oQ 1 1 1 -*j o>— ! i~.i CO 1 iCO i-*iMC^1C0-M ciz;^ a t^ 1 ir~ u^t>i^t^t> H _• 3=2 • H'^OQ 1 1 1 -fc3 Oh- ^ f 03 1 iQO ifflt^tOt^O c^^ CO rt 1 IrH Irtrtr-lrHrt H -fj fi as «o«^- j 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lo ' . 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 l(N 1 i 1 t;- o ; 1 ! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 «S 1 1 1 1 1 ! ! 1 1 I ! H 05 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ti s © ® Qi © ® ®.^.H' © © 02 ^ OOOOOO^^OO H mfflfflffla5«&HH«« 1^' 1 1 1 J 1 1 1 1 OJ liullUU g 3 = '- . = = 2 s 5 sJ c si S.'^-S'S a, SIS 02 311 i : iii ii ill.'sSllJI o io ?? ?-^ ?.-^C-C-5 as 5 ^ ^ w •-. -.-s--^ S !-. cC c^cc;::i:i,i,^^ s ; •o ^ S 'a o !2 3 fa o 3 o tj tn 51 62 g. 1)2; 12; OrH o o> 1 ■ r-r- o CO I 1 iffiO M M 1 1 4i CO jo'^ mo . 1 1 "OSOQ M 1 1 00 I 1 W 1 1 • 3 PQ«o 5j j''> ^1^ s i i a o a; W Id^: U3 1 ! gi^i^ f ! 1 g H tM • tf -St-./ s ^ M .OQ 1 1 [ OOM^ ^■^p 1 1 ! NNgJ -2 o w P4 PQIMOQ I . t- ^ : ! •3 fl*^^ 1 ! rH C^ "Sfc • Xi fQMOQ ] [ (M 1 1 1 .2 J ] IN ! : ! 'w H d . a> SCO . 'O fp'OtH 1 c4 «D© t- .-< liH fl 05 0S 05 I> It- «J o "552 • «J (Q^CO ] t>A t-t- 00 to KO 1 MM M O ■4-> ■a a rtO •* M KO if t-M 00 IN iO 00 00 ® 00 it» 1 1 I CB , 13 ' 1 1 Q f 1 I 1 fl g 0) a> u _2_2_2 CQ "©"o ■q 'o'o'o PQM _PQ_ ««« ; 1 1 1 1 1 » H 1^ •So, S 1 CQ III .s •§-o e o S ■♦•^ .o o w i ; ; 8 i i 8 in "S ii 1 1 ■§0 £'*Si'S J_ &><>^ s j ; (H •o « ST 1 >3 t STK 1 It 21.1 PQAco a 1^^ 1 1 ICO 1 1 ICO -tj QQ !I4^ r>0 llO i 1 ta£ l(N Igl 1 1 -tj 0".^ . ^d^ 1 1 llO s!^!^ ! : 1^ o fH CO fa ' H • o si> . 2 1^ (^wta i(M 1 1 1 1 ei ^1^ ilN ! 1 ! 1 ^ •!-> ^ s H^ Ph _; o fe 3"-! . pqNm iW ! ! : : 1 Ph 1 1 1 1 >> ;3 l^«5 1 . 1 1 loo ^ • • ; I 1 1 i£» Qi H ;=) >. "pco . ja pqooQ Ph ^ Ok-! l>l>l>t^ -f-d ^ 322 • 00 CO ^ d»-! »— t •. mom© etf fl|!= rt(M.-lrH tUO P>i1 ;3 aS CO H (Sa«i llO 1 1 1 1 o 100 ItO O 'O SI CO +3 Ol-^ 300 . ft) H « "o "o"© "o'o'o'o'o'o ^'o'o'o 1 I 1 13 1 a 1 1 t3 bfl Q 2 o . 512; Iz; ^:^^ :tz;;z; SCO . PQ"»OQ -t>' Oh-; ■«■ Oh-; U5 1 1 1 t^ 1 1 1 Th CO 1 o •4 ^ ,S .2 ^ ^ -e— ~ "o "o "o "o p*©"© m n pq n hmpq^ tf 3 s I 1 t .2 t^ fl, 05 ft< ^ «>.S I I 1 1 S 1 u ■*•» Ph o 9) "o O >^ ^ M O OS H 4) a ft izilz; ^■2 boo CO -tJ Oh-; 1^^ f2 <^ 3 .1-* !3« . 300 . 0) o>- 6fi .H I I I I 1-1 I I 1« t. I I I I O I I >oo II I I (N I I IIN 67 (N 00 >-< t-tO OS ■* NO COW CO CO -^co Ot^.. - - 05 .'.lOlClO C0C0««O » «C CO 50 U5 T)< Tjl rH H « _«D ^ 43 QJ HMWfQ m m PQ q) © QJ © 03 'o'o'o'o'o pQMWpqpQ 2 a 2 T3 a l~ 8 .S 8 ag,-2.,« ft :§ S&ss"^ " W ^ k rs JO •a « 3 3 •o s a 2 S u W CO 58 FOREST PROTECTION o o CO 0) W) a 300 . 1^' fe SCO . 300 . P4 & H« Wa FOREST PROTECTION 69 m H u ■^::i • 15 pq'^'QQ iH 1 1 1 1 [ 1 E) M^ IN 1 ! 1 ! 1 1 h » H Pi "st; . oi ^ (M pqcooQ CO 1 1 1 1 [ 1 Oo2 it^ OMTtt 00 00 -p oi-; it>. t^t>t» l>t^ ^ "3^ • ■ ^ lOOC* MM 2 iN CO (NN § •^ OS t O 1 ! : : I ; -d-S*^ 00 1 t 1 1 I 1 •5* ^ .OH 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J3 o 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 H fs ; ; i i i : i s 4 H [ [ 1 1 1 j [ ''S: , , 1 1 1 1 , p L| fe a> o a o o o a p Oi 02 'o'o ■©"o"© ■o'o ^ MPQ wpqpq «CQ 1 u i i n S 1 6^ 0)1-1 o i ; o 02 S-S ^^K : i 11 III e^e- « 1 1 j [ ;3 1 1 IB ►e M 00 P ■it ." s s 55 ' e.g. 8 ^ i O -g^ (i^ O O s- 15 o "2 1 'SiB iss £> oiaj 1^0.0^ q.J a [ •a >i d t « 1 .a 1 8 S U m o« 60 FOREST PROTECTION 3C0 . pqusao +3 Oh-; ^i^;" is OS ■*« HCQ S*^ 3 2 S3 FOREST PROTECTION 61 a OS to CO +5 o S OO 1 N C'^'A 1 lO fe (4 "St^ . K fpfOjc CO 1 ^ i^p> ^ w h) 3W . O 1 03 I (5 "5 CO ,^l^ CO 1 00 W ^ SCO , pq"*oQ CO 1 ■i^^ ?5 ' 1^ ti ^d- 1 o ^^^ 1 sw ! ! _ ^ ' ! e M ' ' Pi H [ ! fe ! Pk^ o 5 n ^ 4 i O J^ m H ^ fa „ s "i :s •« (a 55. S o o 8 i» -s in ft. « \ •O 1 h) ^ J 1 ^. o « o U CO a lU ^*>^ 5 . 1^^ OiO •oco ^ ^ 02 -MrH 2; N 1 OS 1 CO 1 H 1 Q M o «< 02 ^fa II o 1 ID p. i ^1 is ° 1 « ; ■o d &:. « fa 1 1 62 FOREST PROTECTION on H U fc; Oh s f^ ^ !■* • •-H r TO o > ICO 100 1 S |!2;lz; !■* ilO 1 ^ a ►3 S fc "^fS • o m'^02 tHO lON ] 03 05 I0»05 '' "o ^ o CO 00 ICO'* ; >> P^' coco ICO CO 1 Xi ' ' H ta ^S 'Sd ^o- ] [ lOiO 1 OJ ^^t^ coco 1 cq 3 1 1 COCO 1 CO •— » 2?W o o ; 1 1 1 1 ■*J ^5 1 [ 1 1 1 0) ^ « ' ' 1 1 1 W) (D D fjj i 1 i i i M pq 5 -g^a a a i§ ^|s 3 CO •&■§ •Slo e i'i -2 e s 2 o>fe ?3i C s s 2 us^ e-Sa s 1 1 1 1 » a! H O J"^ a SB- ^§"2 •§^5 « » ] J3 •a o a 3 J3 CS 1^ OS u u u t< cd (U 3 u 1 O O ca (^•^(NOi !'-< I I i-H 1-1 05 "-1 05 COIN COCOCCO iCO I it^t^cOTOlQ CO"* liOO I lO <1^ P5oo>-s fP .02 300 . fp'^co o « a 05 105 05 00 100 00 CO ICO CO MM 3J ^'o'o'o 63 -^O^ e cj3 133 r- -'car Q^ C3 ''J i^c fyj Lij fee r*.S-S s-^ Stss g « e R. •S 3 e s ; 0-75 ra M U § S t. w S-g s§- §00 §^t 64 Oh O Xi Oh 3 Oh O CO o o ^23 1^' [X4 ^" Oi-; 32 . ^"5 I O 100 CO H 03 _co_2_g_2 'o'o'o'o nnnn « ij (U 0) s S o S o O a.S- 2 8 8 ii II 1 « 1^ £ 8 8^0 •S a 8 Tj § g 5 8 8 3 o n CO & FOREST PROTECTION 65 Q §00 K^ •* 1 ^ 1 4J m _; "3 W^s CO "3 ^<^ S -p . u moo C3 1 .^"J M W DO O CQO • S^ N ( O 1 1 CT 1 CO 1 (M 1 1 CO 1 1 » <■" p^ _; s 3 CO 2 6h 1 t- 1 CD 1 cu o "pM . t> 1 05 1 (5*^02 [ o ' opoci> >> ^ ^ ^^92 ■ ; 00 1 CO 1 , iO'*IC0 £^ ii'^ 1 C<1• ft m >io3 o u gM a , , 02 CO •2 "e SCO ■§ d d 1 ] 1 w e 1 S o 00 1 ^ 1 S^ K e 1 o §^1 1 lll rS 1? §>!§ CS,jS ^•^ K CQ ^o Qft.&H 8 1 1 t" T) 8 \ h3 ■R ."S ffi J3 +3 p. 3 "o o m w 66 a (U Soo^ l^i 10 10 «3 -*^ 1 1 1 1 02 ■3 W"^ a ci"> lie ^1^ >< eo W ^j H o-h^ • O Z It^ 10 lio lie Ed tL, Ph :iS" pQo . U « 7; 05 03 > H ^ "pro . , 1 ! : I 1 i 1 it^ 1 CO W CO "poo . JJ (^■*C0 ' ' ' [ bJO •ti Of-: 1 1 HO«5 1 OS <3J " 1 j-*t-( r CO EE4 o p.a •+J «a- 10 0) 1 ito 1 1 Oi ^^^ 1-H 1 10 1 W) 10 3 1 It, 1 1 1 3?l III! 1 rt 1 1 1 1 [ « t ! ! ! 1 H^ H ' 1 1 1 1 ' < t» TO a> 1)11 [ P^h M > 0^ a> 0; J t>> 12 8 S -< (^ In •a % '3 U m en n ci Vh (O -«J Pi o o u Ph Pi a CO O bX) cij "^ o . ,,•15 ;2: MO icOOOMCO 0000 • cnoQ OOOOQ ft05 • O n^ MO 3l> . pqMt/2 +> Oh-; W 3C0 . (5 "5 02 «121' 300 . -M oi-; (U Or BO M e M « H CM h CQ 1-* CO « lO I "H 1 CO IIN ICO qj (U OJ 03 OJ Oi 'o'o'o'o'o'o MWPQpqpQW fqm El (4 h O ■S ft S o.g g .el s^o Sec ^- QJ I I - ,:- . s e £ « 5 S S S-fS 8.s.| 1; 'e'e'e C oqcqoqo 1 II 67 3 1 68 o O Z 1 ■^1^05 100 1 1 1«C<5«-<*<'H OtO iO> I'll lT(i I 1 1 |U3 1 1 1 ICO 1 1 1 1 lO) 1 1 1 1^ 1 1 1 1 iC^l 1 1 1 I'* 1 1 1 i 6 a » w CO d a ■*" o 03 Ui <2 m < o » » 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I c 1 1 < 1 I I 1 , , 11 1 1 Icjq 1 1 1 Ic^ 1 1 1 1 < 1 1 1 1 > < II 1 1 1 o II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 ! 1 1 1 III lO II 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i 1 I 1 11 1 1 1 C^ II 1 1 1 1 1 1 OS in OS K ° • I 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 1 1 1 I 1 : 1 1 1 1 1 t^ 1 gj 1 I '< llO 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 103 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 iCS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 do <4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lO 1 III 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IN 1 III 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 t, o . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 CO 1 1 10 1 1 i 1 1 1 oo C o 00 1 1 1 1 ■<}i •* —1 C5 •* 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 II III 1 II 1 1 i-i(N 1 1 1 ii-<(NC^!N(N a, CO w 3t^ . -W Oh-; 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 iCO 1 1 IM 1 1 ■* 1 (N 1 1 1 1 1^ IIM 1 1 Tfl 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 IN II o "aw . 1C<*I-H 1 1 iiniOfN i>005CD OiOiOi 1 1 iOiOiOi lOCOO o I 1 0> 1 1 00 lOO I03 00 ; 1 lO 1^ 10000 1 l-H 1 lOO It^ I0305 1 It- 5 t^CC* | o 00 •* IN ir^ t> lOO 1 H>t^iOC0t>«O n> III o 1 1 1 1 t^ "S H ^ ^ (1 'o'o ts'o'o'o'o'o p'o'o'o'o pqmH««meqmHCQpq«« "o'o "o'o i 1-1 i 1-1 'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o'o (nMfQPQmffiBeqecimfq 1 0) O -° 1 ' • Id d c ' fl ' c ' I^Hlllllll-ii 11 •'So ■*^ t Q 1 t^ 1 ^ 1 is a a i 1 a u 3 M 1 i-s-i §il §i« ^p^ 1^3 §.»•« aS'S sS a 1 (0 b ■-; 1-w 1 lojooj'awas a rS 1 rsts-s fe s s e §J I'e 1^ 1 "-S III 1 s>2 II g 1 1 » to eo « 1 1 1 1 1 1^0000 1 1 1 1 ,1 ^^^'S^'S « § 2 " 3 ^ g>5S5^ S C C g S; lllllllllll 5 £ -^ •■S --S --S ^ » » ft ;a _3 < 1 i 1 m § o 2 a ai IS 1 1 II m 3 PQ05 . 3°^ 1 1 05 1 1 1 > ^ OQ Mm «.gc« 11 I 1 1 1 1 1 CO 1 1 11 ^i^' 1 1 «0 1 1 11 1 1 CO 1 1 1 ' CD I ' ' ' o 1 1 » !5 ! 1 11 1 11 g3 1 ■ II ■ II K H 1 1 tn n 1 II ■< h 1 1 C^ O 1 11 f^S 0} a ^ ^ ^ ^^ b M O O © 03 O O O 5 ta Oliv Dru Mull ay Eichh Say lis Say B * tridenta minuta luteola '. coryli S rufipes barbata armicol "3 s s a 1 1 II 1 11 H 1 1 II 1 II Q D 1 1 J 1 ..I '1 3 O Saperda.. Eupsalis.. Galerucellc Monocesta Hylastinui Magdalis. Magdalis. "3 < Il i 1 i ^ >4 ambyci nthidae ysomel lytidsB. ctilioni 3 l=( 1 & £ ^ S3 70 FOREST PROTECTION i o 05 o ScO^- ^ m 2 6 . 1^^ ^ m f» ^ 02 ^'co (H mo . 1 1 K \-a>a^ u ^ ?^ 1 ! CO 1 1 03 P MO Oh ;3 <^ O M'^ai ; 05 ^^^ W ' rH(M . C<5 IN >> ^ Xi 1 1 ; ; o : 1 ; 1 ^ w T3 a "300 . (U P5"*0C! CO 1 1 I o 4-5 Oh-^ CO : i ; 1 Ol 1 H^ g o 1/ ,H ] •+J < Eh !=««; o p- & © S> (U M 1 m 5 S m 1 ill O a. J2 2 OHM H ; T3 t" j4 ■^ A fe U O o FOREST PROTECTION 71 a OS o ^T)< z 1^^ l>CO Til P^ ' H m u 3m . CO to o (U K 5 -tJ Oh-; 05 0> "Boo . l>00 4^ Oh-; coco >. ^ H di o p^ m5 CO PJ El v^ <; h S ^ fqm ^ 1 3 la 1 !^ 1 *3 cr sS •;3 05 «5 o s & S s -M 02 gl 0) ^'8 biO £>§ c^ S"*^ 1 \ ctf a? l-s P p z 9 It ^g o 8 •o >H (J J3 &( O 72 a 0) SoOj^ CO o . 05M 1 |l^ OOIO 1 (=5 •*j CO J<",JH Wo . t-0>CQ ■* 1 1 00 1 r CO 1 1 <;^ ■^05 . 00 OlMtB i ] \ o K +3 Ot~^ ' I'rt 1 P ; ^ • 3 no 1 2 9i >* « ^ -1^ >< 103 1 i(M 1 +J [x] Oh H O __• JO ^t- • ffl .02 i £? IS? >> W ^ 3ro . pq'OcQ 1 . 1^^ CO 00 1 ii-i 1 it^ W W CO "aco . SJ W*M ] !■ ?5 S '2 o a a ■4J 1 1 ICD 1 lO 1 It^ B r 1 1 1 ctf o ' 1 1 1 Q I 1 1 I ^g _© ££S OQ "o 'o'o'o m mwp; 1 N '. o ]^3 OQ 8 S>H ^- Sg§ 10 s 1 1 O CO m O (^ §?>-§ P. -si's CLi&qI^ 8 J JO 1 (" ►J 8 a J2 a JO ■< (^ C8 >> u "o v u 1 U U) 73 O 0) 1—1 o o *s o 0) a a <» ^oo^_; ] . .r^ CO o . CO 1 in 1 1 1^^ en I Cq 1 1 CO 1 1 ^ ' m ^ «^| 00 ; CO lO I'H 0:S O) i-H IC<1 1^ ' •^V fflo . \]03t» k^"-! . ■* CD <■" _: m 3tZ) . fQ'^02 CO ] 1 I 1 ' 1^^ -^^ • ' 1 1 1 ^ S «w . (^ OoocQ ] ] 1 ; 1 "eS ' ! 1 1 1 ;S H w H tj no5 »ai . i3 O ^ J3M . H'^CiQ 1 ] 1 1 1 03 1 ; 1 i 1 W • SCO . m'^oQ ] [ 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; ; W ■aa ^6- O t^ i^ ir- 1 lO o CO ico 1 CO CO CO ICO 1 o 1 1 1 », z 1 1 1 §2 1 1 1 V o o .■*^ >>> p cd a OQ "o o u a (a a « ^A fe h^h^lnJ i ^ > 1 00 -fj ^ C— J 1 03 02 s 3 5^§ •5 o Co £3^ o *-, (U Or J. S o ? ^'S'S'sj'ss'si'ai 0) -d % 1 a o m Pn CO FOREST PROTECTION 75 u to 6 . 1^^ 03 1 -IS IB 02 Eil 15 "^SS • « ■ (iqcocQ j J ■0 1 il^ 1 i XI > W pH _; m"«^ 1 ; 1 •* • o • ' 2* t^^ 1 1 ^ w t3 ■pro . ; ; ii^ CO 1 oa 1 ■ t^ H ^ piw • (q-^sQ [ [ .1^^ CO 1 1 to W "^i . f^a- -^ OS 5^^ iSw P4& 1-5 iJ Cl,Q .2^ 76 a 0) ^»>; 2 d . (NOSrH 1 to 00 Ot^t^ 1 05 00 ^ CQ :d'*' CQo . T]ai(B ^:t^ III 1 00 1 111 1 00 1 MO'^ 111 1 M 1 flQ « r1^'^ Oh -< 111 1 "es 1 O K w ^ g ; "o >3 3SS • U pqroo2 111 1 1 f>> +3 Ot-^ 1 1 1 00 1 1 1 . 1 cq 1 1 ^ H ^ PM . Oi fqiocQ S* ^1^' CD1050 03 00 »0 CQ 050505 00 05 t^ w H S ^ a pq'^oc! M OOCOt^ IM OS O Ri fOWCO CO CO 0 f 1 c3 .= 5 Ill 1 1 I ►4 Q HPJ 111 1 ( 1 M Ph sh ■< Sh 1 1 1 S 1 ! _©_«_« ^ oj a) p CO 'o'o'o S "o "o fqmfQ K^ pq pq ui Ix! I 1 1 o5 S (^ 1 o3 1 1 1 CO ;fe ] 1 1 e 1 05 1 1 1 ■Js a! o eminat Say... ephalu inn... .s Say. J^ & \quadrigi caprcea erythroc tityus L 7 aculeatu 111 1 ! 1 •i >o CQ o O lEburia--. Neoclytus. Neoclytus. Dynastes. Lyctus Hylesinus 1 3 « 111 .•« 8 1 1 1 lit 1 1 U m £ (» l^>^' , 1 1 t- 1 , eo i>ini> 1 1 I ■^ O . 1 1 t^ ■* 1 o 000 1 1 ^•|2;g 1 1 1 to ' CO 1 •* ■*■*"* ' ' ' m dt- Wo ■ T^OSO! OS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 110 1 li-H tH £. CC .i^ !■* 1 110 10 T3 X ° • '" ' '? ■<1< H^^ r- < a ^j ^t^^ • Kl i-t CO-HCO 1 1 05 O 000 1 1 lO ICOIO 1 1 ■0 ■< o^^ t- fe 3(M . 1 W3 3(N . j I ; ; ; ■*'* ; 1 1 1 1 1 ; "3 ; 1 1 1 1 rHrH ] ; ! ; ! ; 1 QJ >> W < ^ pqMco 1 ; : . 1 ; 1 1 I I I : ^ d +3 Of— ^ l^'^ 00 1 1 00 (33 t 1 iCO CO t t3 bJD o ^6^ (N 100 to ; i> 1 CO CO .•*aa^ CO ^t to itO •* C^ 1 ■* ■*iOlO00O! 05 t- 'J:- s? ' S- ' 00 Sr^Srfe-g- t^ s« " 1 "w ii 1 1 1 ] i'E 05 i 1 _s , ■c V £ r^ (5 ^ lU m a, S s 77 78 FOREST PROTECTION a (U ^*>^ 2 d . to 1^^ ■* 4J m in S u pqiNaj no 00'-' ; j ; -p di-; T-t CO 1 i 1 ii fi^ Ph "Bt- . eq«oo IM [ [ 1 ai -p di-; IM 1 I ] ^ >3 "sfS • o pq"5oQ 1 ] ! •a ! o OS ! i 392 • pq'^cQ ' ' >> I CO ] I ^ 1 1 M • ' , W P4 ^§ . VI (^* o i- -«2 o OhcJ Q tH fii ai ."2 'u 1 1 i la fe o 1 J 4> A o « 1 O a< H o FOREST PROTECTION 79 o *Ph ;3 0) bJO a mo . fpl^CC! «:2;^ i.B ^d- H pq"cB IS CO 3 a a CM CM >. ^ Ph sg &( «! Eh m M PL, &, M .5 'o 1 ^5 i a< Tl (U m W CO H " >, o w ■»-» OQ •1 t ij S ffi ^" ll^ CO ^ CO -i^'iO pqcn • 7^ 00 CO k^^ . — 1 >'. ^.d CO 05 ^-2 CO u 15 Jil 1 J"'S « 5 c3 H fe ^9 o3 (M "^s cq ci •r^t- • u ■< OO5 02 o >> fe ,Q mMsd PL, ^ (a fc< 00 ^ >— > :i « -t-> ih la «i lii QJ a p MN ^ W) CD g 12; ++ cd * fi (S •2 S ei !; .0 ^ fS e H a CQ J- •^ la g. El (H i »j 8 g ■a > bJO c3 C3 1 h4 1-1 a 1 o 05 ^ 6 E] « ^ s o H S B h ■" S CQ a 1 05 P Z H 1 ^ O i K (- ai 3 ij 3 ^ a 2 1 . iSw j~ ^ i di ] S^ OJ S w Ah f^ > !> C3 ^ 03 cd 02 0) ►J h^ C! 1 •H- a 13 c Ui 3 G cd to 5 m O 1 ++ o B< ■£ s +J QQ e a 9i e Ce ^ s ^ a .» z CO •e3 "ai o 1 1 &3 m i ^ < 1^ CQ ."2 d 'vh •O § a> ^ a o a; 'p. 1 O n l°°> Offl «ot~ COIN IN-* 1 OOlOOl C0'*«O «D 1 OS 05 S^ , iM 86 ^ • i-HIN 0(N 1 COCOrt 3" to IN -^ O 1 (N t^ CO J^"^ COlO M>0 IOtH 1 lOlOiO^,.i-lU3i-l tH 1 lO inio 1 US CQ • 3I> o «d:a II II 1 II II 1 1 1 1 1 I W 1 [ ] [ OQ ^^o II II ' II II 1 1 1 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' P i'!^: ■* lO t^^ 1 S.t- .9 w°^ _» "•oa! 1 ICO 1 no 3 ^J"" 3 •^ CO • II II 1 II II _ 1 r 1 , , 1 1 1 1 1 1 d'olD II II 1 II II "^ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' ' IM t>-* } 00 < ft.. . n o . lO 1 •* 1 (N 1 (M 1 II II 1 1 1 ; I 1 ; I 1 I 1 p^ gi^;:? O 1 iO 1 ' II II 1 1 1 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' S t^ Q -M05 0) o 1 I II 1 II II 1 I 1 o (N j I 1 1 1 1 1 «l o° 1 3 ^ o 3fo . Wi pq'OoQ 1 I ] 1 OlO UDCO (ffl© «Ot^ t^t> 1 O 0> 00 05 OS 1 1 s 0000 0000 00 00 0000 0000 0000 1 00 00 00 05 00 1 1 1 C __; o =^22 • s -M fP^GQ [ I j o»2;P O500 0000 OJOS 050 OO OOO o TH I-l o 1— 1 1 1 1 :! 4> 0 1 -co COIN it^OO t- 1 05 CO CO 1-1 OO ; 3 a^^ (CO (M(N CO 1 •*t> i>>o ITfICO 1 CO >o 05 05 r-i 1-C* rHi-( (M 1 !>■* -^tH '«*» ? 1 r-i <-lr-l (M ' loW o 1 1 1 1 1 1 i M 1 g3 i i i i i i i 1 1 1 11$ i> >> t- > !> >>> > > > > > > Q> > > •4^ > o 6 03 ra ^03 03 c3 ^ ^ C3 rt d eS 03 cj 03 03 QQ O O -l iJ yA W ^^A fe ►-5 < CO m o 02 § 55. « w < 1 ^ ! II i \a< 1 S:g S 1 1 ts a 1=1 a % '6 1 ■g 5 i 1 1 'S o PL| •i "1 If H- m II 1 II 1 to 1 1 C3o3 • 11 1 II 1 00 1 1 II 1 II 1 to 1 1 11 1 II 1 M I 1 s M«5 1 1 1 t^ 1 to 00 1 1 1 1-1 1 l^ ■*■* 1 1 1 M M 1 IN "S "8 < / n O . fa II 1 II 1 00 1 II 1 11 1 to 00 1 1 M M 1 IS i 1=» . • o'l-; 11 1 1 1 1 IM 1 1 Si < M ii ! i i i 3m . -P Oh-: MM ■* tOiO to 1 1 00 0000 00 OOCO 00 1 1 00 1 ■300 . -P Oi-! t^t^ 00 OSOl 05 1 1 7i INgq (M INIM (N 1 1 M < 00 1 IM MtO l> IM 1 •* 1 ■* MtO 05 to 1 M Tjl 1 (M rt(M M (M 1 (M ^ is P.. Leaves Leaves Leaves Leaves Leaves Leaves Leaves Bole & Twigs Leaves 1 1 to H G 1 antiopa Linn interrogationis Fab amyntor Geyer maculata Harr tesselaris S. & A._. americana Harr... leucostigma S. & A. pyrina Linn. vemata Peck O Euvanessa Polygonia Ceratomia Halisidota Halisidota Apatela Hemerocampa.. Zeusera Paleacrita 3 H ^ s ^ 8 i I i i 1 « 1 '^ :•§ Ilia «? r& S te Jj U CO CO o 15 i 1 t ^3 "^ o . m to 1 1 05 ■ 00 1 < 1 1 1 < '7 g!2;0' t^ iH 05 (N<0 OS (M ■* CO >-H 1 1 1 ■* I I 1 1 1 ■* c 1 1 1 1 1> 1 1 1 1 II 1 7- 00 CO 1 10 00 II 1 1 t^ «D 1 1 1 1 CO CO 11 1 9 o ei 1 II I t^ 1 rH II 1 CO 1 M II 1 2 o 1 1 00 1 1 1 1 1 CO II I 1 1 M ■ . . a) 1 1 1 Th 1 1 1 1 1 (N 1 I V) i 3a> . pqWcQ 1 0 1 "5 CO N gl 1 CO Ss ; 1 1 ^ 1 1 1 I ! ■? ! 1 1 1 1 ^S I s s s "^-s ^ H^ h:? vq pqm H o 1 \ < II i ! \ ^ ! i =• ^ -t ea 1 •1 i 1 II 1 § •§ t 1 i i 1 1 i l« 1 K) in te! ft;^ fiq iiii 1 lu •- -2 S & to r^ CO IH W ^ 3 5 5 88 ci o '2 d. CO tH o C lO 1 ■* 1 003 tH 1 1 1 IC CO 1 CO 1 cool CO 1 1 1 e^ 1 fa I 1 1 1 1 1 00 o ■* ■* 1 II 1 1 1 1 CO (» t^ 00 1 11 1 1 ilCOCOMCO 1 b < fa 1 ! 1 I 1 I (M ! 1 1 1 1 tH 1 1 1 1 1 ■^co . *: Of-; itH 1 U5 coco 1 00 1 1 1 100 1 00 0000 1 05 1 1 1 < to 3oo . pq^oQ ICO 1 05 05(35 1 O 1 1 1 i(N 1 (N (MIM 1 -"Jl 1 1 1 1 tf ■^O Ol «5 t-.>>>>>> ^ > ,a > Q^O) m (u a>a> o) o o) o a; 1 < IH io Fab rubicunda Fab tesselaris S. & A... americana Harr... lunata Dru leucostigma S. & A. pyrina Linn. disstria Hubn acerni Clem acerifoliella Fitch. 1 CD O Automeris Halisidota Apatela Homoptera Hemerocampa _ _ Zeuzera Malacosoma Aegeria Incurvaria < 1 8i' a ' 1 J ! ' i ' ' ' S3 m < •-< 89 90 FOREST PROTECTION a lU 2 o . 00 oc i^ 1^^ «3 -p m -Mu5 pqo3 . T-oooo m o CO i?l ?" ■* 1^ o5 S lO IM CO CO ccS ■flOl . ^ ei a pqoscB O IN o h^ [^ T3 ^ •IS 3M . E^ fpOcc • 4> +3 Ol-^ 00 00 1 >> W ^ "soo . 1 . P< M^ 00 00 1 i (0 W CO g ^6- 1 1 lO ■* •^ « ^^=^ (M (N iSl 1 \ ^; ' • o W) n (1 5 > > > > & ca d 03 3 ^ ^ « m Ai 2 8 ^ci Q OQ 11 1 i \ 1 3 IQ p e 1 Q £ "S in 1 -IS 1 it ^ 1 < iJCO i3 tQ 1 •1 a 1 ."3 "3 IH 3 CO FOREST PROTECTION 91 o • 1-H Ph a P4 s ^ H a Ins. Bui. No. 7 Ohio ^ Parts Suffering CO 3 ) 1 3 1 oo p O .8 o a i •a a 3 p< CO 92 FOREST PROTECTION l^^ o o Si s s FOREST PROTECTION 93 a « .*> to o • 00 1^^ '^ ^ to 02 y^ O 'Ph CO g ^a Pi < „ (H a mK .-{ u ^ ^ ^■^1 IM ^j Oi t3 "3^ . o d a (5 "^02 05 CO § m*cQ (M ^ CO di ^i . Oh ^^^. OJ •S ^t 00 *Vh iSH oi h-) o B s V •3 o ^ U) OQ 0) 1 g 1 1 ctf 4^ S Q CD § n M W <5 o m '■^ !h S m 1 1 « s s CO 1 .. 1 a S " fe; O 1 < « "2 ►< a t:i ^ g 2 ja fe 1 H 94 FOREST PROTECTION o .."■eS ■* III n CO , 1 ; o ifl III P3 III « • i« 3 ■-1 lO 1 1 t "*^ o • CO IN 1 1 (H "^l^ ■* ■* 1 1 u K M -2 m W Oh o "^fS • a pq"=oQ 1 030i05 t» 1 a> ioW 1 III P^ 1 III o en « 1 III -4-> ?g s 1 II! a> (^g ■s jo JS££ W) 00 (S "o "©"o"© - a Iz; PQ WWffl u ' ' ci ** ^ '1 « 05 o » 02 02 sylvanicus minalis H ornis Fab. pennis Kb; Qi gl S 6 o'-* .8 iiii § III z fio "8 to « « H S S ?3 2S 3 o . §, Is S S d s Q § s. s. s. ^ bbt) ++ jl^ 1 8 ' ■3 1 •n 1 (5 ■3 « o ^; 1 H (k to FOREST PROTECTION Damage to Populus spp. by Hymenoptera 95 Family Genus Species Parts Suffering Literary References For. Bui. No. 46 U.S. St. Mus. Mem. No. 8 N. Y. ithredinidae integer Nort ventralis Say Twigs Leaves 68 70 302 322 Pteronus Damage to Alnus glutinosa by Hymenoptera Family Genus Species Parts Suffering Literary References Ex. Sta. I No. 233 Cornell $ul. tthredinids Kaliosphinga — dohrnii Tischb Leaves 58 96 a (U ^°^>; w 6 . 00 1 1^^ 3 1 5D ^ 02 ^ cScO . to 1 < i.""^ o 9 " fl 00 1 lO S 1 3 m fa cJ 0._u . Oh 05 oo O d 69 fa a> S -i:> a 5 id^: >, O 1 w fa CO 1 >% ^ ; ; CO -ij Ok-; i ' 03 05 _• «3 300 . 3 pq^cQ ] [ O 3 -t! Of-; ' ' o C ta o ^5«i ■* CO CT> -^ ^^^ o o t^ rH IN CO ioW o2 I \ E P P -ift . !> qj & OQ c^ CQ ^ ^ "o pq ^ ' 1 >3 ! 1 a 1 1 00 a m fl H a tn O >) (P 13 H u u 111 a o e CQ 1 1 (0 o { Z "S e a If II 8 1 (H 1 : i jj «j'=3 i fa •11 « a a >>« OH in 97 a o s«^ 11^ O IC(N 03 >OCO ^• to • 3 PQco- tc .SS"® H tS=^ s ' '2 O -t^ • t. 1 i-rJH g 02 O O » -.'^'^ K y, W a i.'^'o? ^ ^ III 1 (M 1 o 1 CO 1 C! _jj 0) a.^ . »3 (N 1 1 w O 1 1 >, "3 CO ^ 1 W 1 1 t^ 1 m [X4 m "3^^ . ^ fqi^oo 1 1 B t (32 1 1 CO 1 P H • o 300 . 1 (M 1 a> -li Ok-; 1 CO 1 W) W cd 1 1 1 a 1 1 1 CD » Eh K 5P 1 n 03 -< |i| , to 4) FM£ o > t> p -2 c3 (S OQ O (U (B ^Ir li 4 i •S i ' ID g /3 a> 1 5 3 e-e s S s S a< 8 c3 3 CQ hercule americ ulmi S 1 8 00 cs p s , s. z 2 1^ H § «§• O 1 |l 8.i ; TS-O 1 EC4 s5s k< a a O 4> C«H 98 FOREST PROTECTION u 0) -4-> Ph o a I W >> Ph P4 a « ^_oo^- M^^ CO CO .-"■^ Boa •o 50 ^j en g^a CO fe 1 3M . (5"'CQ «'|f^ 05 05 H 1 • 352 • fq-^co -P Oh-: o W ^§ ^O- o> ^^^ SH bJO s ^1 E? FOREST PROTECTION 99 ::^:z; 100 FOREST PROTECTION I i Damage to Hicoria spp., by Diptera Literary References ■p ._-_,„ Family Genus Species SUFFEBING G'de. L'flet. No. 16 A. M. N. H. Cecidomyiidse Cecidomyia carycBCola 0. S Leaves 27 Cecidomyia holotricha O. S Leaves 26 Cecidomyia tubicola O. S Leaves 27 Damage to Quercus spp., by Diptera 1 Genus Species Parts Suffering Literary References M Family 5th Kept. Ent. Com. U. S. G'de. L'flet. No. 16 A. M. N. H. 1 Cecidomyiidae Cecidomyia Cecidomyia Cecidomyia niveipila 0. S pilulos Walsh poculum O. S Leaves Leaves Leaves 206" 31 30 30 i Damage to Liriodendron spp. by Diptera Genus Species Parts Suffering Literary References Family G'de. L'flet. No. 16 A. M. N. H. Cecidomyiidae Cecidomyia Cecidomyia liriodendri O. S tulipifera 0. S Leaves Leaves 25 25 Damage to Cornus florida by Diptera Genus Species Parts Suffering Literary References Family G'de. L'flet. No. 16 A. ,M. N. H. Cecidomyiidae Cecidomyia clavula Beuten Twigs 29 Damage to Acer spp. by Diptera Genus Species Parts Suffering Literary References Family 5th Rept. Ent. Com. U. S. G'de. L'flet. No. 16 A. M. N. H. MycetophilidEe Sciara ocellata 0. S Leaves 411 33 FOREST PROTECTION 101 a (U ^°°>' TO o > cq 1 1 a> 1 r 1^^ 05 1 1 (N 1 1 (N 1 1 4^ CO _; "3 Mco . 2 1 1 "^ 1 1 ^i^ O 1 1 ^s m 02 H 1 .■= 03 f5 Hod iil f~ 1 1 t-t 1 1 ^ „• CIj p^ s C3 .^ (NIMIN IN ^ H -*^ o • lOCilO O u =°l^ ■* +J H ><' .&• ;3 w ^ |^>H- U^ 1 1 r-4 1 1 , w . o . O 1 1 U3 1 1 U5 1 1 I >, fa Xi 1 1 1 , , , CO fa 1 i ; ;o 1 1 ] M § O ifO lO 1 1 s ^^^ rt lO 00 100 O 1 1 00 1 1 ■* t^ o Sh C5 :a : I'r* 1 1 ', ! 4> n i' ^ 1 1 bO 1 22 'H , 1 1 1 1 JogJ — mm 03 p H & M ©"0 -5 M bjO bO ci ;g ^ o OJ (D fi ^ ■^ Q Hfq;^ ^HH H ■^ 1 1 1 ! 1 j o ] , -3 1 1 1 CQ M fa 1 ! -2 1 1 fa 1 : >> S fa |Wfa •i '< '< *0 1 1 a •S-0.0 :§. 1 ! "H ■ggg e ' ' ^ aww Re-e- a, *' 1 «' e (0 Z O S S o OOi-q Oi^ft^ ^ 5 «' s fa 3 u p. o 4) < O u 102 FOREST PROTECTION a 0) ^00 • . .w 2 ■ 05 1 05 O 1^^ 00 1 z ^ » m ^ &, 3 ^ 03 f*^ (M 1 IM !h ■^ d • >o 1 ^1^ ■* 1 •* ^ « >^" W ■M (3 C^ 3C0 . pq"'a! [ [ 105 lt> 1 w W >. poo • , , ,a iCO I Ph W ■aa ai tfo«; m 1 i ^^^ lO 1 op 1 1 s Sw , , 1 o ; ; 1 -*-> B 3 ' < 1 4) M W ' ' ' W) a faD bO Si p ctf , , « '2 m I"© S) aA 3 S*^ '^ s OQ "S *- :s| e w ff-» 00 P s Z tel « ^ H S S ■O § <"C ■< 00 as (H ; i ."2 fli •3 12 fe 'a *3 p. 1 < u FOREST PROTECTION Damage to Juglans spp. by Hemiptera 103 Family Genus Species Parts Suffering Literary References Geol. Rept. for 1899 N.J. ccidse y Twigs - - - 210 Damage to Hicoria spp. by Hemiptera Family Genus Spbcies Parts Suffering Literary References Geol. Rept. for 1899 N.J. Guide Leaflet No. 16 A. M. N. H. St. Mus. Mem' No. 8 N. Y. jhididae )ccidae Phylloxera - Lecanium.- cary sp.- cBcaulis Fitch. Lvs. & Twigs Tw «■« 209 210 38 331 Damage to Alnus spp. by Hemiptera Genus Species Parts Suffering Literary References Family 5th Rept. Ent. Com. U.S. Com- stock's Manual St. Mus. Mem. No. 8 N. Y. phididse Pemphigus tessellatus Fitch.— Lvs. & Twigs 1637 U61 195 lAs Schizoneura tessellata. Damage to Fagus spp. by Hemiptera Genus Species Parts Suffering Literary References Family Com- stock's Manual phididse Schizoneura imbricator Fitch. _. Lvs. & Twigs 161 104 FOREST PROTECTION ctf ■«-> Oh W) a 3 O . CO to TPrH o S! « PQOtB 3-* poo Eh i-?E-im rto eg FOREST PROTECTION 105 Damage to Uhnus spp. by Hemiptera Genus Species Parts Suffering LiTEHAET References Family St. Mus. Mem. No. 8 N. Y. Uphididae ^occidae Callipterus Schizoneura Colopha Chionaspis Gossyparia ulmifolii Monell._ americana Riley. ^ ulmicola Fitch americana Johns.. spuria Mod Leaves Leaves Leaves Bole & Twigs Bole & Twigs 176 177 186 207 203 Family Joccidse. Damage to Liriodendron spp. by Hemiptera Genus Eulecanium. Species tulipiferae Cook. Parts Suffering Twigs. Literary References Geol. Rept. for 1S99 N.J. 1210 St. Mus. Mem. No. 8 N. Y. 208 'As Lecanium, u +-> a. S 0) B a (U ^°°> <-t CDO fNO ■*"5 to O . CO 020 loot^ r~i> (N rtC^ IrHrt T-( »— 1 1.^5 ^ I +5 ' 02 __; 3 1 Mco . ^'^>' looos 1 > ii^ I-*-* 1 1 lOt^ 1 1 ■ +j m ,^"2 aM 3 « o fl ° O cS o 1 OS 1 1 1 1 I50 1 1 1 1 ; \ to — ; 4^ O ICO 1 1 1 1 1 en 1 1 1 1 iCO 1 1 1 • ei o fe tf '3'-i . (M pqt-cc 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 "3 1 1 : 1 : 1 ' ' t3 3^ . ^ Oi— ^ "5 i ; i ; i i i^ • pro . fCl'^CB 1 1 1 1 1 1 +3 Oh-v C3 O505 1 1 " ' ' ' w "tfoo • pq^^o! 1 1 1 I 1 1 -P Oh-; CO COCO 1 1 1 1 CO COCO 1 1 1 1 ' ' W ■as ^5^ to l>C^ 1 1 1 1 ; 1 5^^ Oi -*(^ 1 1 1 1 1 '< Sh — ^ — ;;!!:> ^ 2; 1 I 1 1 I , , nJ w fl « ' 1 , 1 « H 1 ' CQ «J m m a a (5 fH ho fc^ W)^ (U > > ^ t P 02 '^ p P. 3 O Q) OJ 03 c3 H HHh^Wi-^i-^ 1-1 H^ -1^ bjQ 1 1 i d a 3 a^£ 1 ip^ I ] m 5.2 1 ! ^=« S P u Q:* M rt t- S^r- MOO !| 5 1 gH Cm a .2-g e e e a •e^'3 l O O e e 1 1 1 1 i ! 1 g 1 1 1 1 ' 1 "^ s *' s " e J H o 8 .S'S S o o-g s? ?> e 3 S ?> it Eh 'jJlilKlOHeilftH OC| H ^ i 12 i ■-3 [j^ C4 u A o ^ 106 FOREST PROTECTION Damage to Various Woods by Isoptera 107 Family Genus Species Pabts Suffehing Literary References Ag.Yr.Bk. for 1904 U. S. St. Mus. Mem. No. 8 N. Y. Termitids Leucotermes flavipes Koll seas'n'd wood »389 187 lAs Termes. Damage to Various Conifers by Orthoptera Family Genus Species Parts Suffering Literary References For. Rept. No. 7 N. Y. Com- stock's Manual Giyllidse Gryllotalpa Gryllus Oecanihus borealis Burm. spp ■pini Beut Rts. nurse'ies Rts. nurse'ies Leaves '512" 117 117 lis 108 FOREST PROTECTION g ^°°>; 2 6 . CO 1^^ CO ^ OS CQ S3 m o 1 """ca 00 o CO -(-> P^ P4 ^ o Ph as . J3 ^ 0^9 1=1 +-> K P^^ fi 50 u .O > M xt (-1 1^^ 03 00 03 00 H ^ nSS • •« (5"*ai > CO CO a H 4) 1 t> 1 OS o CO ' m a ! CO odS ■^ 1 ?J y « H 1 .2 =8 i *V4 p-1 £ > > p E? c3 CQ ^ a) O 1 1 -»-> I a 03 05 >, 3 S ctf S :& p i 1 ""^ ^ 1 g S 00 1 1 !z; o g H fe o O >c O a, J- C3 s & « HI "O •o 3 ■«1 1 •^ Pci a 3 Ji o P4 »-) FOREST PROTECTION 109 CHAPTER III: PROTECTION AGAINST PLANTS. Par. 6. Protection Against Weeds. Weeds are plants, herbaceous or lignaceous in character, the pre- Bence of which in the woods is financially undesirable. A. Influencing Factors. I. A plant may appear as a weed in one locality whilst it is useful in another. Kalmia, e. g., is useful on steep slopes by holding the soil; whilst it is harmful on areas in regeneration. Grasses and herbaceous weeds are valuable on forest pas- tures; they may interfere, however, with natural regeneration from seeds. II. A plant may be considered as a weed at a certain stage of certain sylvicultural operations. This is the case with black gum, witch hazel, box elder, halesia which forms a superstructure in- terfering with the regeneration of yellow poplar, chestnut, and yellow pine. On the other hand, these same species may be valuable as an un- dergrowth or as a companion growth with yel- low poplar, chestnut, pine and oak after the thicket stage. III. A plant of a usually valuable kind may be classed as a weed when it is hopelessly deformed; e. g., decrepit, hollow, burned chestnuts; fire shoots of hickory and oak. Thus the forester might distinguish between "ab- solute weeds," which are always damaging, and "relative weeds," which are damaging only under a given set of conditions. B. Most weeds injure the forest only indirectly. Direct damage is done by parasitic weeds, in rare cases. The most note-worthy cases of indirect injury are the following: I. Smilax, grapevine, blackberry interfere with the transportation of wood goods and with the ease of access to the woods. II. Sedge grass, heather, blueberry form a matting through which water or air cannot pass. 110 FOREST PROTECTION III. The mineral fertility of the soil is absorbed by the weeds (especially the fruiting weeds) competing with the trees for a food supply. IV. The weeds, notably those produced after fires, inter- fere with the natural regeneration of the best species of the forest; they prevent, through dense shade, the lignification of the valuable seed- lings during summer. Instances are: Chinqua- pin and gum in the case of yellow pine regener- ation at Biltmore; witch hazel, dogwood in yel- low poplar regeneration in Pisgah forest; black jack oak in long leaf pine forests. V. Some weeds distort and oppress the seedlings and saplings after climbing to their tops. Grape- vine on yellow poplar; Convolvulus on many tree seedlings. In tropical coimtries, the tree climbers (sometimes parasitic) are particularly troublesome, notably in felling trees. VI. Certain weed species (notably Ericacce) produce, through their leaf fall, an unfavorable, dusty humiis. VII. Weeds harbor and hide mice and damaging insects. VIII. Dead weeds increase the danger of fires, especially in the spring. IX. The dead mould spread on the ground by many weeds prevents the germinating seed of valuable species from sending its rootlets into the mineral soil. X. Certain weeds play an important part in the path- ology of the trees, the weeds acting as hosts for the second generation of certain fungi. C. Means of Protection. I. Preventive measures. a. Maintain a complete cover overhead — a pious wish in the primeval forests. b. Underplant light demanding species with shade bearers at a time at which the leaf canopy overhead, through friction of crown against crown, be- comes excessively open — another pious wish under the present con- ditions confronting American silvi- culture. c. Work towards immediate reforestation after making a clean sweep of the old crop. FOREST PROTECTION 111 d. Insist on thorough protection against ground fires which, above all, foster the growth of weeds and are in- jurious to the nobility amongst the forest species. Kalmia, chinquapin, alder, soft maple, gum, halesia ob- tain the upper hand in the forest through fires. On fertile soil the growth of annual and biennial weeds after fires is especially luxuriant. In the Adirondacks, the reforestation of fire-swept tracts is handicapped by the excessive growth of forest weeds. e. Admit for pasture cattle, hogs, sheep and goats, thus checking at the same time the danger from fires, II. Restrictive Measures. a. Cut (with a mowing scythe) herbaceous weeds before the seed ripens. b. In forest plantations, cultivate the rows of plants, or raise farm crops to- gether with seedlings. c. Plow abandoned fields thorouglhy before reforestation. d. Crush blackberry briars; decapitate ferns; skin thorns; deaden gum, dogwood, maple, beech; remove the bark for 2 ft. above the stump on cotton- woods to prevent the growth of root suckers. e. Cover the stiunps of undesirable hard- woods with dirt or brush; poison the stumps; peel the stimips down into the roots; set fire to brush heaps massed upon such stumps in cop- pice woods. D. Weed Species. I. Andromeda, huckleberry, etc., are expelled by the continued use of a briar scythe, preferably in early August. Valuable seedlings are planted on reversed sods when placed in thickets formed by the above species. 112 FOREST PROTECTION II. Kalmia and Rhododendron may be checked by burn- ing. They sprout luxuriantly after such burn- ing. They do not catch up, however, with the more rapid development of the seedlings planted at the same time. In other cases, it is better to allow ivy and laurel to grow unharmed. The stems when over 4" in diameter can be dead- ened readily. III. Chinquapin may be deadened with crushing tongs in spring. IV. Dogwood may be deadened. Dogwood sprouts grow vigorously from the stumps; hence it will not suffice to cut the dogwood with an axe. V. Large trees of black gum are skinned or deadened. It is impossible to get rid of small shoots. VI. Hazel, Vaccinium and Azalea on moimtain pastures can be checked by the use of a colter, by re- peated mowings or, possibly, by pasturing goats. VII. Blackberry is expelled by crushing its shoots or by skinning them between two pieces of timber. VIII. Ferns should be decapitated in early spring. IX. Climbers (Clematis, Vitis, Ampelopsis and others) are checked by cutting close to the ground. FOREST PROTECTION 113 Par. 7. Protection Against Fungi. The diseases of our American trees caused by fungi have been studied by Dr. Hermann von Schrenk, of the Shaw School of Botany. Still, it must be admitted that our knowledge of the diseases of trees induced by cryp- togamic parasites is deficient or inadequate. In the forest, obviously, the present conditions confronting forestry do not allow of "tree doctoring." Nurseries and young plantations in which fungi may cause enormous dam- age are practically absent from our forests. Fungi directly causing the death of trees, of over 12 inches d.b.h., are practically unknown. ^ Saplings and poles killed by fungi die from below, whilst those killed by insects die from above. A. Effect of Fungus Infection. Observations in the United States are at hand only with re- ference to fungi of a technically damaging character. Such fungi may cause : — I. Disintegration of lignin, leaving the shining white fibres of cellulose untouched. II. Disintegration of cellulose leaving a brittle brown mass resem.bling charcoal. III. Disintegration of entire cell walls, leaving a hole or holes. IV. Liquification of the rosin incrustating the heart- wood, in which case the rosin exudes at branch holes where it solidifies by oxidation, forming knots, galls or streaks of rosin. B. Parts of Tree Infected; and Methods of Infection. Fimgi may attack the heartwood, or the sapwood, or both heartwood and sapwood. Heartwood fimgi (which never kill a tree directly) enter through insect mines; through axe scars; through branch stubs having heartwood, or through tops broken off by snow, by sleet, by falling neighbors or by Storm. For the latter reason, diseased timber prevails fre- quently along wind swept ridges and shores. Sapwood fungi may use the same channels of access, or may enter the wood through lightning streaks and through fire clefts. Sapwood resists the attack of fungi much better than heartwood as long as the tree lives. The sapwood is the life zone of the tree in which it defends itself readUy, by thick- ening its cell walls or by cell wall incrustations, or by form- ing cork against the spread of hyphse. In dead trees, on the other hand, sapwood decomposes much more readily than heartwood owing to the absence of F 114 FOREST PROTECTION incrustating substances and owing to the presence of more moisture, more starch and more albumen. The insects co-operate with the fungi to an unknown ex- tent. Corky bark being fungus-proof, many spores enter the galleries of boring insects either carried by the wind or car- ried in the "fur" of borers and enemies of borers. It might be stated that the insects distribute spores in the same man- ner in which the birds or the rodents distribute seeds. A par- ticularly interesting case is that of "Ambrosia," a fungus supposed to be raised by the Ambrosia beetles. Cyllene ro- binise makes possible the inroads of Polyporus rimosus. Dis- coloration of the sapwood coincides with the attacks of Den- droctonus frontalis and follows the "steamships" in oak lum- ber. A fungus-lawn is foimd in the mines of Lymexylon. Infection is performed (a) most frequently by spores, 1. in dew or rain (notably — the lower fimgi); 2. by wind (notably — the higher fungi); 3. by insects (rarely, after Tubeuf); 4. by forcible ejection of spores from sporocarps, asci and sporangia. (b) more rarely by mycelium, 1. notably when the myceliimi lives in the earth, or rather in the roots {Trametes radiciperda, Agaricus melleus "(Rhizo- morphs)"; 2. also above groimd, the mycelium spreading from plant to plant {Trichosphceria, Herpotrichia). . Many fungi appear immediately after the affection of the tree by other detrimental influences (e. g. after insects, fire, storm, drought), so that it is possible to decide upon the immediate cause of damage inflicted only by the test of arti- ficial infection. The fungi found present upon a dead tree can never be considered, eo ipso, as tree killers. In many cases the mycelium of the tree killer has dis- appeared when the tree is dead; and only sporocarps may be still present. Many parasites on the other hand develop sporocarps only saprophytically on a dead substratum. Certain timber fungi stop work at once when the tree is cut, e. g., the yellow rot fungus of black locust and the peck- iness fungus of bald cypress. The progress of decay, in such cases, ends with the death of the tree. The speed at which a fungus disease spreads from a given point of attack is entirely unknown. This speed is very fast in the case of saprophytes working in dead sapwood; it is prob- ably very slow in the case of parasitic fungi attacking the hea.rtwood of grown trees. FOREST PROTECTION 115 The tales of cruisers to the effect that a tract will "be- come punky in ten to fifteen years" do not seem to deserve any credit. An old tree is, ceteris paribus, more readily affected, and more apt to be found affected by disease, than a yoimg one. C. Beneficial Fungi. The symbiosis of certain fungi with certain trees (dis- covered by Frank) seems to be beneficial to both; possibly essential to both. Many of our trees and shrubs are dependent upon cer- tain fimgi, at least for such foods as are derived from humus. These fungi consist of delicate, cobwebby threads such as are seen on mouldy bread. These threads spread through the soil and either enter the outer cells of the root or simply form a mantle (Mycorrhiza) about the root. The fungi live upon decaying animal and plant matter, and transfer a por- tion of this food to the root and doubtless secure in return certain benefits from the root. This mutual helpful relation- ship of two plants is termed commensalism. The majority of our heaths, evergreens, poplars, willows, beeches and oaks have become dependent upon these fungi and do not thrive in soils where the fungi are not found. Some herbaceous plants, like the Indian-pipe, have be- come entirely dependent upon these fxmgi for food and have, as a consequence, lost all their chlorophyll. This field of forest ecological study is practically vm- touched, though it will form the basis of future silviculture. Certain fungi might be used, technologically, for the prepar- ation of pure cellulose. D. Signs of disease. The signs of disease are visible only on a tree, usually, when it is too late to save the patient. These signs are: — A. Hypertrophical swellings, f.i., knots on Spanish oak and tumors on yellow pine at Biltmore. B. Exudations of rosin in galls or in seams. C. Appearance of sporophores, which are rare in some species, but are frequently seen on diseased red oak, locust, and ash. When decaying holes ap- pear on a tree, the forester is apt to find the whole tree diseased. Yellow poplar trees are sound within one foot, and white oak logs are sound within two feet from the actual end of a cavity. 116 FOREST PROTECTION The tree weeds, e. g., Halesia (Mohrodendron) , gum and calmia, might be exterminated in days to come with the help of their fungus enemies. E. Synopsis of the orders of damaging fungi. I. Order Phycomycetes. Family Peronosporeoe. The mycelium is unicellular. The propa- gation is effected by niunerous branching hyphae forming at their tips little sacs or sporangia in clusters or chains (conidia). These are carried by wind to other plants where they germinate at once, forming a tube that penetrates the leaf. If the leaf is wet, the contents of the sporangia break up into a number of zoospores which de- velop the characteristic hyphse of the fungi. Sexual reproduction occurs in most species and consists of a gametangia cut off from the ends of the hyphse and fertilized by male gametes developed on branches (antheridia) of the game- tangia bearing hyphse. The resulting thick walled gametospore tides the fungus over winter. American representatives are not fully known. Some bad nursery fungi belong to this family (notably Phytophtora omnivora). II. Order Ascomycetes. 1st. Family — Pyrenomycetes. Flask-shaped frutifications (peri- thecia) are characteristic of this fam- ily. Within the perithecia, which are open at the top (angiocarpous), occur nimierous asci, each containing eight spores. Preceeding the formation of perithecia, conidiospores are usually formed which are especially efficaci- ous in disseminating the fungi. Ex- amples: Nectria on maple and beech. 2nd. Family- — Discomycetes. Distinguished by open gymnocar- pous apothecia (cup-shaped recepta- cles, bearing freely exposed asci). The Discomycetes are unimportant for the American forester, none being observed as damaging our trees. Rhy- tisma acerinum frequently forms large black incrustations of pseudo-paren- chyma on the leaves of maple, conidia developing in the summer and mature FOREST PROTECTION 117 apothecia in the succeeding spring. The most important representative of this family in Europe is Peziza. III. Order Basidiomycetes. Spores carried on basidia of definite shape and size, and bearing a fixed number of spores. 1st. Family — UredinecB. All are injurious parasites, the myceliimi being in the intercellular spaces of the tissues (particularly iu the leaves) of higher plants. These fimgi change their hostplants, showing a double generation, and develop sev- eral kinds of asexual spores, according to the season and to the host; aecidio- spores and pycnoconidia in spring; uredospores in summer; teleutospores in autumn, which in the following spring develop basidiospores. The my- celium from the basidiospores enters the first host and develops the aeci- dium stage (formerly the genus Ae- ddnim) with aecidia and pycnidia. The next stage on a different host develops the uredospores (formerly genus Ure- do), and in autiman the thick walled teleutospores. 2nd. Family — Hymenomycetes. Basidia imbedded in a common hymenimn which clothes, in Agari- cacece, a series of radial lamellae on the imder side of the pileus, and in Poly- poracece and Boletacece, the inner sur- face of pores. In a few genera no distinctive fructifications are formed (Exobasi- diurn vacdnii, parasitic and causing hypertrophy on Ericaceae). Another arrangement of the orders and families of fungi might be made with reference to pathogeny: a. The groups Uredinece 1 Ustilaginece contain parasites only, (so-called "Smuts") so that no proof of Peronosporece ( parasitism is required. Exoascece (witch broom) ^ 118 FOREST PROTECTION b. The groups Pyrenomycetes Discomycetes I contain parasites as Hymenomycetes V well as saprophytes so Myxomycetes / that proof of parasi- And several groupsV tism is required. of lower fungi and| bacteria. This proof is obtained by artificial infection only. Infection reveals, — (1) parasitic nature of a fungus, (2) exact species of fungus, (3) relationship of hetercecious Uredinece and their host plants (uredinal, telial and secidial stages), (4) various forms of reproductive organs, (5) conditions favorable to attacks. The fungi might be further divided into two large groups, namely: (a) Physiologically obnoxious species (tree killers and tree deformers) belonging to the orders Phycomycetes and Ascomycetes and to the family Uredinece of the order Basidiomycetes. (b) Technically obnoxious species (wood disin- tegrators) belonging notably to the fam- ily Hymenomycetes; this group may be sub-divided into fimgi living on dead trees (Saprophytes) and fungi living on live trees (Parasites). Group (a) is of greatest importance in Germany and France; whilst group (b) is of greatest importance in tha United States. F. According to parts attacked, the forest fungi might be subdivided as follows: I. Nursery fungi and plantation fvmgi. II. Root fimgi in saplings and poles. III. Leaf and twig fungi. (Bulletin Bureau of Plant In- dustry No. 149, page 18). IV. Fungi causing hypertrophical formations (witch brooms). V. Fungi discoloring lumber or timber. VI. Fimgi destroying the cambivun and the sapwood of standing trees or poles. i FOREST PROTECTION 119 Vn. Fungi destroj-ing the sapwood of dead trees and of logs. VIII. Fungi destroj-ing the heartwood in li%-ing trees. IX. Fiingi destrojdng timber, ties, poles and posts after manufacture and •n-hilst in use. G. Fungus species worthy of note which are physiologically obnoxious. I. Agaricus meUeiis (honey fimgus) is a champignon attacking and killing conifers four to fifteen years old. "^Tiite pine suffers ven,- badly. The disease spreads underground through the so- caUed rhizomorpha (strong threads of mycel- ium). The soU at the basis of affected plants is charged with exuded rosin. Comp. Biill. Plant Industry, Xo. 149, page 23. II. Aecidium pint attacks the needles and the yoimg bark of pine saplings. The spores enter by a woimd and the spread of the mycelium in the cambium causes hj-pertrophical formations, es- pecially on the main stem. The teleutosporous generation has a Senecio species for its host {Coleosporium senecionis). III. Peridemiium cerebrum (family UredineoB) kills two year old lodgepole pines as well as other pines. (Agric. Year Book 1900, p. 200). IV. Peridermium strobi, known as the blister of the white pine, has Pinus cembra for its original host. Whilst it does not injure this species serioiisly, its attacks are deadly to our white pine during its juvenile stage. In old trees well protected by hea-vn,- bark, the tops and branches alone are affected. The disease is frequent abroad; and stringent measures should prevent it from en- tering into the Tnited States. The uredal form of the fimgus [Crotwrtiurti ribicohi}7}) forms blotches on the leaves of the currant (Ribes). Compare Quarterly Journal of Forestry-, July, 1909, p. 232. V. A Gymnosporangium causes the "Cedar apples" of red cedar; see Bull. 21, Div. of Pathology, p. 8. For. Bull. 31 (Red Cedar) p. 25. VI. Hysterium pinastri causes the shedding disease dreaded in nurseries. Pine seedlings up to foiu* years old drop the needles of a sudden in spring. White pine is little affected; strong seedlings are im- mune. The disease spreads through old needles on which the fungus lives saprophj-tically. Not observed in America so far. 120 FOREST PROTECTION VII. Diaporthe parasitica (discovered by Dr. Murrill) is the worst treekUling disease yet described in the United States. It tends to exterminate the chestnut trees from New York to Virginia, and is spreading southward. Entering the cambial layers of the tree and notably those of its branches without the requirement of preceding wounds, the mycelium actually "girdles" the living trees (W. A. Murrill, in Jour. N. Y. Bot. Garden 7: 143-153; Bull. No. 149, Bureau of Plant Indus- try, p. 22). VIII. Hypoderma sirobicola is the "needle blight" of the wliite pine and appears to be a dangerous para- site on Pinus Strobus. Compare Tubeuf's "Dis- eases of Plants," english edition by W. G. Smith, p. 233. Tubeuf claims that the disease may devastate whole tracts of forests. A disease of the white pine similar to that described by Tubeiif has been reported from Massachusetts (various articles in Woodland and Roadside), from Wes- tern North Carolina and from eastern Tennessee, and is being studied by the pathological divis- ions of the U. S. Dept. of Agriculture. Compare Circular No. 35, Bureau of Plant Industry. IX. " Damping-off " is a disease of seedlings soon after germination dreaded by all nurserymen, and decimating many natural regenerations (birch!). The fungi causing the disease are imdescribed. H. Fungus species worthy of note which are technically obnoxious. The genus Polyporus (including Trametes, Fomes, Boletus, Polysiictus, and Dcedalea) is responsible for the decomposi- tion of heartwood in living trees frequently brovight about by the help of an enzym. Overaged timber is almost invariably attacked by Poly- porus. The sporophores may appear in branch holes or scars, and are, although the disease might be common, rare in many species. Most noteworthy are the following Polypori: — I. Polyporus annosus (or Trametes radiciperda) , a root fungus of conifers, attacks pole woods. Sporo- phores under ground in roots. Wood turns brown to begin with and is finally hollowed out. (Agric. Year Book 1900, p. 207). II. Trametes pini causes the heartwood rot (known as "red heart") of pine; the punkiness and per- haps the ring cracks of fir, long leaf, short leaf, FOREST PROTECTION 121 and sugar pines; the speckled rot or red heart of Douglas fir; the cork of western hemlock. It is found only in trees over forty years old, usually more in the top of the tree, — but in Pinus monticola close to the gound. The wood never rots out entirely and the absence of cavi- ties is characteristic of this fmigus. It enters through branch stubs containing heartwood. Reference Bull. For. 33, p. 15; F. & I. 1902, p. 62; Agric. Year Book 1900, plate XXII. and XXIV. and page 206. III. Polyporus juniperinus creates long holes coated white in the heartwood of red cedar. (For. Bull. 31, p. 25; Agric. Year Book 1900, p. 208; Bull. 21 of Div. of Vegetable Pathology). IV. Polyporus carneus causes the red rot of red cedar and of arbor vitse. The wood splits into small cubes, charcoal like. (Bull. 21 of Div. of Vege- table Physiology and Pathology; For. Bull. 21, p. 26). V. Polyporus versicolor causes the soft rot of live catalpa, Polyporus catalpce the brown rot of the species; Bull. Bureau Plant Industry, No. 149, page 47 and pp. 53 to 56; Bull. 37 of Bureau of Forestrj', pp. 51-58; also in oak and hemlock and beech (For. Bull. 51, p. 31) as a saprophyte on ties. VI. Polyporus rimosus causes the yellow rot of black locust, in its heartwood. Holes made by locust borers {Cyllene rohinice) serve as entrances. (Agric. Year Book 1900, p. 207); Contr. Shaw School of Botany, No. 17; Bureau Plant Indus- try Bull. No. 149, p. 45. VII. Polyporus schweinitzii causes the "butt rot," "groxmd rot" or "root rot" of all conifers, notably of Douglas fir and hemlock. Fungus enters at the base of the tree through insect mines. Trees die in patches; sporophores are short-lived. (Bull. For. 33, p. 15; F. & I. 1902, p. 61; Agric. Year Book 1900, p.p 203 and 206, and plate XXIV). VIII. Polyporus fraxinophilus occurs in white ash having over seven inches d.b.h. The hyphae seem to enter by the water niches left by broken branches. Wood becomes straw colored. Very frequent. Reference Bull. 32 and Bull. 149, page 46, of Bureau of Plant Industry. 122 FOREST PROTECTION IX. Polyporus nigricans attacks beech, birch and poplar in the New England States causing standing timber to rot. (Agric. Year Book 1900, p. 207; Bulletin Bureau Plant Industry No. 149, p. 42). X. Polyporus sulfureus causes the brown rot of many- conifers, also of oak, walnut and cherry. (Bull. Bureau Plant Industry No. 149, page 37; Agric. Year Book 1900, p. 207). XI. Polyporus igniarius occurs everywhere on beech and oak. (Agric. Year Book 1900, p. 207; Bulletin Bureau Plant Industry, No. 149, pp. 25 to 37). XII. Polyporus libocedris causes the peckiness of bald cypress and the pin rot of incense cedar. The pecks consist of disconnected holes (or pockets) about 4" long ending abruptly and partially filled with brown powder. Foxmd in trees over 100 years old. Reference: Contr. Shaw School of Botany, No. 14. XIII. Polyporus pinicola. Western conifers, four years after death, are found entirely destroyed by Poly- porus pinicola. Reference: F. & I., 1902, p. 60; Agric. Year Book 1900, pp. 202 and 209 and plate XXV. XIV. Polyporus obtusus is a common cause of the sap rot in dead oak trees (Bull. Bureau of Plant In- dustry, p. 41). XV. Polyporus fulvus causes the so-called "red heart" of the birch (Bull. Bureau of Plant Industry, p. 47). XVI. Polyporus squamosus causes "white rot" in various hardwood trees, e. g. maple, oak, beech, birch and ash. (Bull. Bureau of Plant Industry, p. 48). XVII. Polyporus pergamenus causes the "sap rot" of trees and logs — often after fires — in many hardwoods (notably oak); its work is particularly quick, and so is the rapidity of its fruiting (Bull. Bureau of Plant Industry, No. 149, p. 56). XVIII. Polyporus betulinus and fomentarius may parasiti- cally weaken living birches and beeches (Mayr), or may be satisfied to cause the decomposition of weakened and of dead wood (Von Schrenk), (Bull. Bureau of Plant Industry, No. 149, p. 49). XIX. Polyporus applanatus is reported as the killer (?) of cottonwoods (Bull. Bureau of Plant Industry, No. 149, p. 58). FOREST PROTECTION 123 XX. Polyporus ponder osus n. sp., described in detail by H. von Schrenk in Bull. 36 of Bureau of Plant Industry, p. 37 f.f.g., causes the red rot of Pinus ponderosa killed by insect pests at the lapse of two years. The fimgus is a saprophyte closely resembling Polyporus pinicola. Aside of the Polypori, the following technically obnoxious fungi deserve attention. I. Lenzites sepiaria is a saprophyt preying on hemlock, long leaf and short leaf pine — notably on rail- road ties. (Reference For. Bull. 51). II. Schizophyllum commune attacks railroad ties of short leaf pine, hemlock, etc. saprophytically. (Ref, For. Bull. 51). III. Unnamed fungus, the sporophores of which are un- known, attacks Sequoia sempervirens and causes "brown rot" (or "butt rof or "pin rot"), the decay beginning in the inner rings of heartwood near the ground. The fibre is converted into pockets, usually twice as broad as long, filled with dark brown matter. (Reference: For. Bull. 38, pp. 29-31, and plates X. and XI). IV. Ceratostomella (Sphceria) pilifera, a saprophyt of the family Discomycetes, causes the bluing of sap- wood in the Itmiber and in the dead boles (killed by Dendroctonus) of Pinus ponderosa. This fungus does not interfere with the strength of the tim- ber; it decreases its fissibiiity- — a disadvantage in cutting of railroad ties. The spores seem to enter through the ladder mines made by the Ambrosia beetles — but do not seem to develop into Ambrosia. Reference: Bull. 36, Bureau of Plant Industry entire. "The bluing" of the sap wood in logs and limaber is disastrous notably to the value of poplar logs driven or rafted to destination dur- ing spring and summer, of poplar sap lumber, pine saps, sap gum and the like, sawed and slowly air dried during spring and smnmer. These in- juries are due to undescribed fungi. V. Echinodontium tinctorium attacks western hemlock causing "cork," — like Trametes pint; also in spruce and red fir. (Reference: For. Biill. 33, p. 15). 124 FOREST PROTECTION J. General remedies against fungi on live trees. I. Extermination or removal of the fimgus itseK; (1) in case of seeds, by sterilization with hot water, or copper "steep-mixtures." (2) in case of leaf-fungi, by dusting or spray- ing with mixtures containing copper or sulphur. (3) in case of Agaricacece and Polyporacece, by removal of sporophores, by excision; (4) in case of dead parts of plants carrying sporocarps, or other reproductive stages of fungi, by dead-priming, or removal of dead litter on ground. II. Extermination of living host or of affected parts of same. (1) Removal of living host. (2) Removal of complimentary (hetercecious) host. III. Avoidance of conditions favoring infection. (1) no woimds, or antiseptic treatment of same; (2) avoidance of localities favorable to disease; (3) no large, even aged, pure forests; (4) no selection systems, no summer cutting; (5) rotation of crops; (6) no planting of hetercecioios hosts together; (7) mixed forests; short rotation; suppression of boring insects; no artificial priming of living branches; (8) raising strong trees of individual power of resistence and independent for help from neighbors; (9) improvement cuttings and thinnings. K. General remedies against fungi in nurseries. (1) Change of species, notably in nursery beds. (2) Sterilized soil in nursery beds. (3) Deep trenches between nursery beds. (4) Drenching the beds with a weak solution of sulphuric acid (one ounce of acid to one gallon of water) prior to seed planting and after the sprouting of the seedlings. Compare Circular No. 4, Bu- reau of Plant Industry. (5) Production of fungus proof varieties. (6) Spraying of affected leaves or shoots, or beds with Bordeaux mixture, consisting of a 3% solution of copper sulphate and lime (Recipe, Tubeuf & Smith, page 69). FOREST PROTECTION 126 L. General remedies against fungi in young regenerations. (1) Use very strong plants. (2) Do not buy plants from nurseries known to be infested. (3) Toungya.. (4) Avoid foreigners. (5) Plant only kinds known to suit the locality. (6) No regeneration from mother trees in pine {Hyster- iumf) in beech {Phytophtora\) etc. (7) No seedlings of conifers near stumps of hardwoods. M. General remedies against fungi in lumber, ties and poles. (1) Wet storage; preservation in ponds (mUl), saltwater (tamarack), running water (Caesar's Rhine bridge), swamps (Ky. walnut). (2) Dry storage (like furniture) xmder shelter; dry kiln!! (3) "Antistain," or "painting," or exposure to sim and wind; or else interruption of logging and mill- ing from April to September. (4) Impregnation either of the wood, or of the medium in which the wood is kept. (Compare H. von Schrenk, in Bull. 14, Bureau of Plant Industry; further Lectures on "Utilization" by C. A. Schenck, paragraph XLIV). 126 FOREST PROTECTION Par. 8. Protection Against Parasites Other Than Fungi. A. A number of phanerogams live parasitically upon various trees, notably in the tropics. In the United States, the common mistletoe (Phoraden- dron flavescens) and the dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobium cryp- topoda and pusillum) are worthy of note. (Bull. Bureau of Plant Industry No. 149, pp. 14 to 17). Arceuthobium occi- dentale deforms the bole and the branches of western hem- lock, causing cancerous tumors (Plate VI, Forestry Biilletin No. 33, p. 16). The damage done by these parasites is so insignificant that remedies are nowhere indicated. B. Tree mosses, tree algse and tree lichens are variously reported as malefactors when occurring in such quantities that young leaves and fresh shoots are smothered by them. It is possible also that they interfere with the function of the "lenticels." Tillandsia usneoides and Usnea barbata may be mentioned as representatives of this group. The former called "Spanish moss" is a flowering plant, common on trees in the Southern States; the latter, a lichen, is abundant in northern swamps and woods. Compare Bulletin No. 149, Bureau of Plant In- dustry, page 17. Part B : Protection Against Inorganic Nature. CHAPTER I: PROTECTION AGAINST ADVERSE CLIMATIC INFLUENCES. Par. 9. Protection Against Frost. Fkost May be Beneficial By checking insect plagues (late frost), also mice and other rodents, decimating them in cold and protracted winters; By clipping back inferior species competing with aristocrats (beech vs. oak at Viernheim); imdesirable coppice sprouts, cut in Aug- ust, are apt to die; By furnishing ice on lakes and on iced roads, creating conditions favor- able to transportation by sleds, and steady weather for logging, skidding, etc.; By increasing the value of firewood, and oftentimes by forcing men to take employment in the woods when other occupations are barred by frost. A. Frost is Injurious to Utilization By Interfering 1. in the south with the logging operations, — owing to the unreliability of the occurrence of frost; the necessity of shoeing cattle; the formation of jams in flumes; the interference by late frost with tan bark peeling, etc.; also by bursting trees, when felled in frozen con- dition; by toughness of fibre so as to retard the feed of the saw-carriage; by danger to water pipes, con- nected with engines, boilers, locomotives, donkey engines, etc.; by necessity of changing the setting of the teeth, and the temper and the speed of the saw. 2. in the north with water transportation on the lakes (no- tably Great Lakes) and rivers (notably St. Lawrence). B. Frost is Injurious Physiologically (Sylviculturally) By killing leaves, buds, shoots, branches (notably sappy shoots), flowers and fruits, seedlings and (rarely) saplings. There is no proof at hand of poles or trees of native species being killed by frost. Foreigners (e. g., palms, eucalypts and many species tried in nor- thern prairies) are subject to frost. 127 128 FOREST PROTECTION Absolute cold is not injurious, eo ipso, to native species, which know how to protect themselves by leaves dropped by non-freezing cell contents by lignification by cork layers, bud scales, hairs by color by position (rolled up rhododendron leaves) by beginning growth late and by finishing it early. The death of a specimen, or of parts of it, is brought about, in all probability, by a rapid transition from cold to warm (cite various theories, and experiments made to support them). Hence it is that the severe frost of winter, or frost occurring at a time at which plants are protected, is less injurious than a light early frost in fall or a light late frost in spring. Frost occurring unexpectedly is most injurious, — and particularly so to the young parts of an old plant or to a plant, all parts of which are young and tender (e. g., germinating seedlings). (a) Influencing factors are: Locality (frost holes), latitude, altitude, exposures (eastern); Atmospheric conditions preceding and following a cold spell; Snow cover; Condition of plant (germs sprouting; buds open- ing; shoots lengthening; lignification unfin- ished) ; Size (age) of plants; Presence or absence of wind. (b) Consequences of frost are: Failures of nursery beds; Failure of natural seed regenerations; Failure of seed years; Failure of seedlings to compete with weeds (e. g., sedgegrass and walnut at Biltmore), and with rabbits (e. g., maple and chestnutoak at Biltmore) ; Saplings and seedlings growing . bushy or forking (cherry, loosing tips of shoots incessantly; larch, at Biltmore, on Bradley Plantation, due to September frost, 1906; echinata at Biltmore, everywhere, due to September frost, 1906); Aristocrats smothered by mob (walnut at Bilt- more overtopped by hard maple, owing to frost); FOREST PROTECTION 129 Shortened growing season; Restricted number of species locally producible; Double rings of wood, and possibly windshakes in wood; Weakened condition of a tree, subjecting it to insects and fungi, and also to breakage by storm, snow and sleet, owing to the reduced elasticity of the fibre. (c) Species afflicted: The species known to suffer, in one way or an- other, from frost are called "sensitive;" the others are known as "hardy" species. SENSITIVE AT BiLTMORE Chestnut Beech Maples Oaks Black Gum Catalpa Scotch Pine Oregon Ash White Pine Oregon Maple Rigid Pine Box Elder Halesia Pinus ponderosa Cottonwood Pinus lambertiana Hickories Pinus echinata Spruces Edgeworthia Douglasia Walnut Yellow Poplar Buckeye (d) The remedies against frost are almost entirely PREVENTIVE: (Restrictive measures are possible only in nur- series, and consist in watering the beds after very cold nights). 1. In nurseries: Late planting of seeds in spring, where late frost is dreaded; or else early planting where early frost is feared in fall; Lath screens, or nursery under cover (unless lignification is handicapped); Clouds of smoke on frosty mornings; Avoidance of east aspects; Heeling-out transplants, so as to retard sprout- ing in spring; H 130 FOREST PROTECTION Avoidance of dense stands in seed beds (ash seed- lings at Biltmore failed to lignify in 1905, excepting those at outer edge). 2. In plantations: Remark: A seedling once crippled by frost is apt to be crippled again, and again, and again, owing to the fact, that the replace- ment of organs once lost takes time; so that the growing season is shortened. The wal- nuts and buckeyes at Biltmore, once clipped back by frost have been clipped back an- nually. Early planting in spring to avoid early frost; Late planting in spring to avoid late frost; No experimenting with the introduction of new species; Natural regeneration of Pinus echinata (also White Pine in Adirondacks) to avoid for- mation of double whirls; Planting sensitive species beneath a light cover overhead, so as to prevent excessive height growth, or premature formation of spring shoots. Use of strong stocky seedlings, since minute plants are prevented from lignification by shading weeds. Selecting species suiting the soil (walnut on best soil, where it will lignify; echinata on poor soil, where it will form one shoot only), the exposure, and the climate (prairie plant- ing); Cultivation, so as to stimulate insolation and lignification; possibly pruning to same end; or else to give the lead to one side shoot amongst several when the leader is frost- kUled. 3. In natural seed regeneration: Progress of the axe in shelterwood-types accord- ing to the requirements of the seedlings, viz., slow, where late frost is feared, so as to retard the act of sprouting in spring; or else rapid, where early frost is feared, so as to allow of lignification; Untimely and sudden removal of mother trees may shock tender plants (even spruce 5' high), on the other hand. FOREST PROTECTION 131 Frost may be invited on purpose to check a less desirable species in mixture with a hardier and more desirable species. C. Frost is Injurious BY LIFTING (UPROOTINg) SEEDLINGS IN NURSERIES AND PLANTATIONS. Subject to damage are: Flat rooted species growing slowly in early youth, notably conifers (yellow pine yearlings, white pine yearlings, spruce, hemlock); Moist localities and loose soil; East exposures, and notably steep east aspects. (a) Remedial m^easures are: Pressing seedlings back, soon after accident. (b) Restrictive measures are: 1. In nurseries: Drainage by deep paths (middlings) between the beds; Proper aeration of soil; Seedbeds planted broadcast; Strong seedlings, and long roots; Shading beds, and covering space between the • rows of plants; No weeding in early fall. 2. In plantations: Planting on reversed sods; Mound planting; Planting three year-olds (two year old trans- plants in case of yellow pine); Planting ball plants; Planting under shelter overhead. D. Frost is Injurious By CAUSING frost cracks in hardwoods only, notably in case of injured trees and of species having strong medullary rays. Insect disease and fungus disease follow in the cracks. Remedy: Timely thinning or improvement cutting. Cracks occur, notably, along lower part of bole; on standards over coppice; on south side of trees; on medium sized trees (13^'-3'). in moist localities. 132 FOREST PROTECTION Par. 10. Protection Against Heat. A. Heat Causes Harm Only: When it invites forest fires; When it fails to be balanced by the moisture in the air or soil (wood lots in the prairies; old park trees); When it occurs suddenly, striking the trees in a state of non-pro- tection (e. g., new plantations and trees isolated of a sudden). B. The Plants Protect Themselves Ordinarily Against Heat: By dropping leaves; By resinous cell contents; By closed stomata; By color and position of leaves; By coverings of cork, hair and that like. C. Remedies: 1. In infant forests: (a) in nurseries: Secure irrigation; Provide lath screens or cloth screens; Maintain a cover of mould on the soil; Cultivate so as to increase the porosity of soil; Plant the seeds early in spring before the winter moisture has vanished; Transplant early and transplant deeply. (b) in plantations: Use strong transplants; Adopt mound planting; Plant under cover; Adopt ball planting; Avoid loss of root fibres during act of out-planting; Cultivate. (c) in natural seed regenerations: Remove mother trees slowly; Remove trees reflecting heat unto young growth. (d) Generally: Maintain a dense cover overhead, and a good layer of humus underneath. 2. In pole forests and tree forests: Characteristic for damage (so-called sunscald) is: Bark scaling off; Sap wood turning brown; Discoloration and decay within a distinct sector of bole, (a) Prevent simscald by avoiding sudden changes of the influx of light; FOREST PROTECTION 133 Notably so in the case of dense stands of beech, spruce, white pine, ash; Notably on the West-South- West edge of a wood lot. At Biltmore, Oak saplings along the macada- mized roads; chestnuts on the arboretiun road; and hickories of small diameter have been visited by the disease. (b) Do not remove the trees affected by sunscald; their removal will merely expose the trees in the rear, and the damage will continue. (c) Do not remove, from endangered trees, by priming, any living branches. (d) Time the progress of the axe properly in thinnings, preparatory cuttings, seed cuttings and removal cuttings. 134 FOREST PROTECTION Par. 11. Protection Against Snow and Sleet. Snow is Beneficial: By preventing fires; By storing water and by preserving soil moisture; By facilitating the logging operations; By covering sensitive plants; By removing dead side branches; By preventing frost from entering deeply into soil; By reducing the felling damages. A. Snow is Technically Obnoxious: By preventing the use of wagons or railroads; By endangering skidding on steep slopes; By increasing sledding expenses (when snow is too deep); By causing extra outlay in cutting stumps low to the ground; By reducing the accessibility of the woods. Remark: Winters of excessive snow are known as winters of re- stricted output of lumber. B. Snow is Physiologically Obnoxious: By bending down saplings and poles with or without their roots; By breaking off branches and crowns or by breaking down poles and trees with the roots; By causing rodents and game to attack trees and saplings for food; By exposing trees after breakage to the attacks of insects and fungi; By increasing storm damage at a time when the trees are loaded with snow or sleet. C. Factors of Damage. Species and mixture of species; Age and size of trees; _ Method of regeneration and notably the density thereof; Climatic constellations (e. g., coincidence of storm; succession of thaws and snows; occurrences of snow in Octover, before the fall of the leaves); Preceding treatment by thinning; by removal cuttings; by leavin] standards after coppiceing; by road making. Locality, elevation and aspect: Steepness of slope; Depth of soil (Coxehill); Rate of growth (fast grown yellow pine and top whirls of fast grownj white pine at Biltmore;) Prior injuries by fire, by boxing, by insects and fungi (black locusts). Remark: Remember the following illustrations: White cedar in swamps of South Carolina; Cuban pine in Alabama; FOREST PROTECTION I35 Poplar tops in Pisgah Forest; Topped white pines in the Pink Beds; Black locusts and hickory on mountain tops; - Plantations of rigid pine in Black Forest; Spruce saplings in the Balsams, in the early spring of 1908, D. Remedies: Selecting the proper species for planting or for natural seed re- generations, in keeping with the requirements of the locality and of the climate; Group system of natural seed regeneration; Planting in rows instead of planting in triangles (Hess); Thinnings properly made beginning early in very dense regenerations; Pollarding; Readiness of permanent means of transportation so as to make possible the salvage of broken timber. CHAPTER II: PROTECTION AGAINST STORM, EROSION, SANDDRIFTS, NOXIOUS GASES. Part 12. Protection Against Wind Storms. Wind is Beneficial: By restoring the chemical balance of the atmosphere; By distributing pollen and seeds; By preventing excessive formation of side branches; By bringing rain. A. Damage is Caused by Wind Storm (aside of forest fires spread or fanned) : (a) in plantations: By loosening the anchorage of tall seedlings and saplings; (notably, after planting in furrows, in the prairies, on sand dimes); By drying out roots and shoots and leaves and soil (notably in the early spring); By removing the protecting cover of snow; By allowing the "mob" to whip the top shoots of "aristocrats." (b) IN EXPOSED localities: By one-sided (seashore or Pisgah ridge) or stimted growth. (c) IN TREE forests AND IN LAEGE POLE WOODS: By breakage of crowns or branches, thus allow- ing access to fvmgi and to insects; By breakage of stems at their point of least re- sistence; By uprooting trees singly, in avenues, or in large blocks; By endangering the logging operations. B. Factors of Damage ake: (a) Species: Flat-rooted conifers are most endangered; a mix- ture of species in advisable. (b) Size class: Poles and trees over 8" in diameter are most subject to damage. (c) Locality: Leeward sides of lakes; Mountain slopes and mountain tops on leeward side; Moist spots; Shallow soil. 136 FOREST PROTECTION 137 (d) Prior Treatment: Partial logging, leaving a freshly bared front exposed to the prevailing storm; Standards over coppice; Single seedtrees over regeneration; Borggreve thinnings; Turpentining by the box system; Interference with anchorage of roots by making ditches or roads. (e) Shape of trees: Cylindrical trees are more top heavy than coni- cal trees. (f) Accompanying circumstances: Heavy rains soaking the soil; Heavy seed years when the tops of the trees are loaded with cones; Sleet; Snow. C. Preventive measures: (a) Sylviculturally: Ball planting, deep planting, sod covering on shifting sand. Fostering hardwoods or mixture therewith; Early and moderate and regular thinnings; Pruning or lopping to reduce top-heaviness; No standards; No single tree method of natural seed regeneration; Proper preparation in due time of trees intended for an isolated position; Short rotations. (b) Technicai^ly: Avoidance of logging methods leaving points favorable to the attack of storms; Progress of the axe against the direction of the barometric minima; Herty method of terpentining; Proper "cutting series;" Timely "severance cuttings." D. Restrictive Measures: Readiness of means of transportation (railroads and roads) after wind falls; Removing the bark from wind falls; Throwing wind falls in water. 138 FOREST PROTECTION Par. 13. Protection Against Erosion. The adult forest does not require any protection from erosion — usu- ally so. It must be remembered, on the other hand, that "civilization" (by ditching the slopes on the hills; by cutting roads and railroads into the soil; by draining the bottom-lands for farming purposes) increases the rapidity of the subterranean and of the superficial drainage; that it results in a par- tial destruction of the soil on the hill sides. Erosion, in the present geological acra, is not so active, nevertheless, as it was in prior periods. A forest plantation on the hill side suffers during its early stages from erosion where the soil consists of clay, and where the plough has preceded the establishment of the embryo-forest. Some seedlings are washed out of the soil whilst others are covered by detritus. At Biltmore, erosion has harmed particularly the so-called "old school house" plantation, in its earliest stage of development. As soon as the forest covers the ground fully, viz.: when the branches of neighboring specimens interlace, all erosion is usually stopped and stopped for good. Oftentimes deep gullies are cut into the side slopes during and after agricultural occupancy of the soil; in such cases, the stopping of the gullies by wicker works or hurdles can be recommended. These wicker works should not protrude more than one-half foot above the surface of the soil. They should be made, particularly, at the upper end of the gully. It is useless to make them at the lower end alone. These wicker works will hinder erosion to a certain extent; wUl quiet the soil within the gully; and will allow the grasses and the weeds to occupy the sides of the gully. The most interesting case of erosion met in Eastern America is, pos- sibly, the erosion exhibited in the immediate proximity of the smelter works at Ducktown, Tenn. Here, the hillsides were laid bare entirely at a time at which the smelters used the timber for charcoal. Following this deforestation, the bared areas were used for roasting (by the open heap method) of the copper-bearing ores. As a consequence, every vestige of vegetation has been annihilated on the hillsides and eros- ion has had a chance to work in an amazing degree of intensity. Erosion may be checked by horizontal ditches — or ditches running at a very light grade; by the planting of grasses or weeds between horizon- tal ditches; and finally, by afforestation. There is no means better than successful afforestation by which the soil can be fastened or anchored to the underlying rock. Afforestation as a topic of lectures belongs into "Sylviculture" and into "Forest Policy." FOREST PROTECTION 139 Par. 14. Protection Against Shifting Sands. Instances are rare in which the forest requires any protection against shifting sands. On the other hand, the forest frequently tends to protect from damage the farms, the raihoads and other human interests. In other words: The forest requires, rarely, protection against shift- ing sands; and it acts freque-ntly as a protector against shifting sands. Famous instances of the role which the forest plays in this connection are those of Cape Cod, Mass.; of Hatteras Island, N. C. (Compare Collier Cobb's article in the National Geographic Magazine entitled "Where the wind does the work"); in Central Hungary; in the Landes of Gascogny, France; in the Rhine Valley near Darmstadt, Germany; along the Colum- bia River in Oregon and Washington; and so on). A. Shifting sand along the seashore is found notably in the form of sand dunes moving landward, fed and driven by ocean winds. It would be unwise to attempt any afforestation of the dunes nearest the ocean. Afforestation may set in at some distance from the ocean in protected depressions foimd between parallel dimes. The dunes are fixed, to begin with, by rough palings forming the heart of the dunes and causing a constant growth of the height of the dunes. The sides of the dunes are fortified by sandgrasses and sandweeds. The species used for afforestation belong to particularly modest genera: Cottonwoods, willows and pines are recommended. Obviously, the forester restocking shifting sands is interested in the i fixation of the sands more than in a direct revenue derivable from plantations made at a very high expense on very sterile soil. B. The case lies somewhat different on sand areas foimd inland. Here, afforestation is frequently indicated as a means toward a revenue obtainable from soil lying otherwise unproductive and threaten- ing, at the margins of the sand fields, destruction to adjoining farm- land. The usual method of proceeding is the following: Sods of grasses or else sods of heather are laid on the soil, checker-board fashion. Within the sods are planted longrooted yellow pines, preference being given to transplants two years old or else to ball plants one year old. There is no harm in "deep planting." Afforestation should begin on the windward side of the sand area, in protected spots. The most famous attempt made in America toward the afforestation of inland sands is that of the Forest Service trying to establish, on the "Bad Lands" of Nebraska, a. planted forest on a large scale. 140 FOREST PROTECTION It is obvious that small plants are pulled out of a loose soil readily by the wind — notably so in the case of evergreens; and that large transplants suffer badly from the shock of outplanting and from the inadequacy of the water supply available on sterile sand. Wheresoever the soil is apt to become shifting, the law should prohibit the removal of the trees by their owners. The influence in that direction exercised by a commonwealth is dealt with in the lectures on "Forest Policy." FOREST PROTECTION 141 Par. 15. Protection Against Noxious Gases (Sulphurfumes) . By the term "sulphurfumes" are understood certain gases formed by the oxidation of sulphiu-. Huge amounts of these gases are produced wher- ever sulphur-bearing minerals are treated in the presence of atmospheric air. Contamination of the atmosphere is one of the evils adherent to civili- zation, or, which is the same, adherent to an increase of population at cer- tain centers. The breath of any man or any animal and, more than that, the srnoke rising from any building (dwellings as well as factories) contami- nate the air. After Angus Smith, the atmosphere at Manchester, England, contains a little less than the one-millionth part of SO 2 on the average of the year. The rain water investigations made by the same English author show the rapid increase of sulphuric acid in rain water near industrial centers. The sulphur contained in common coal averages 1.7%, of which 1.2% develop into noxious sulphurfumes. In other words, 85 tons of coal will develop on the average 2 tons of noxious SO 2. Since the consumption of bitimainous coal in the United States is in excess of 200,000,000 tons per annum, it appears that we send into the at- mosphere (pre-eminently in the northeast) annually about 4,700,000 tons of sulphurous acid. A. Natuhe of Damage to Leaves. There is not at hand, at the present time, any scientific explana- tion of the strange physiological effect which sulphur fumes exercise upon vegetation. After Prof. Naegeli, SO 2 checks the normal movement of the live plasma in the leaves. Von Schroeder finds that the transpiration from the leaves is that function which is most vitally reduced by inhalation of SO,. During night, transpiration from the leaves is naturally reduced to a minimum, and it is interesting to note that there is little difference in the evaporative function of leaves during night, whether they be exposed to SO 2 or whether they be left in an atmosphere free from SO 2. When the sun shines, the difference between the evaporation in leaves exposed to SO 2 and in leaves exposed to a pure atmos- phere is very striking. Reduced transpiration appears to be noticeable before discolora- tion of leaves occurs in a sulphurous atmosphere. After von Schroeder, very small quantities of SO 2 continuously acting produce the same final result (always in the glass case) which large quantities will produce acting for short periods only. This observation does not tally with the results of Freytag's experiments made in the open air. 142 FOREST PROTECTION Darkness reduces the damage by SO 2 more than dryness. In the presence of light, heat and humidity, the discoloring and dead- ening action of SO 2 is most intense; which is to say: It is strongest when the vital functions of the leaves are most active. Parallel experiments show no discoloration as a consequence of the absorption of SO 2 in the dark room (at night), although such absorption takes place actually. Wet leaves show much more discoloration than dry leaves in the same sulphurous atmosphere. The main difficulty met in ascertaining the dilution at which SO 2 becomes innocuous lies in the disturbing influence of light and moisture. After Freytag (experiments in the open air) damage is possible only in humid air, or when the leaves are slightly wet from drizzling rain and from dew. Again, after Freytag, air containing less than 0.003% (of weight) of SO 2 is innocuous, even under adverse hydrographic con- ditions and in spite of continuous fimiigation, applied during a number of weeks. Freytag's experiments are the only open-air experiments which have been conducted with scientific correctness. SO 2 and SO 3 are absorbed in the same absolute quantities by the leaves when present in the air in equal proportions. Discol- oration of leaves, however, and decrease in transpiration from leaves are, simultaneously, much smaller in an atmosphere of SO 3 than in an atmosphere of SO 2. Consequently, all conditions which favor the formation of. SO 3 in the air before the air touches the leaves must decrease the damage — espec- ially so in the case of chronic affections. The assumption that clouds of smoke interfere with the admis- sion of light and hence with the assimilation of the leaves is erroneous. There is no such thing as the "stuflSng up" of the so-called stomata found on the leaves (through which inhalation and transpira- tion takes place) caused by soot or solid particles contained in the fumes. Experiments made by Stoeckhardt prove this thesis beyond a doubt. B. Chemical Remarks. Sulphurous acid (H 2SO 3) is unknown in the free state; it is likely to be contained in the solution of gaseous SO 2 in the water. Sulphurous acid forms primary and secondary sulphites; its salts are obtained by saturating a base with a watery solution of SO 2. If siilphurous acid is eliminated from its salts by the action of stronger acids, then it forms its anhydrid and water. FOREST PROTECTION 143 Since a large number of calories of heat are set free by the union of S and O, in forming the SO 2, the anhydrid is a constant combination. SO 2 is readily reduced, by H2S, into water and sulphur. In watery solutions as well as in gaseous form SO 2 readily oxidises into SO 3, when exposed to the influence of the atmosphere, 32 calories of heat being liberated by such oxidation. On the other hand, SO 3 at red heat dissolves into oxygen and SO 2. It stands to reasofi that with increasing distance from the smoke-stack the contents of the smoke are more SO 3 than SO 2. After von Schroeder, the gases of SO 3 are, without a doubt, less damaging to vegetation inhaling them than the gases of SO 2. Within the leaves SO 2 is very quickly converted, by oxidation, into SO 3. A few hours after gas-poisoning, only SO 3 (not SO 2) can be proven to be present within the leaves. Chemical analysis of leaves can only fix the territory infested in a random way. It can never be used as a measure of damage locally foimd. The damage can be assessed only according to the effects discernible with the naked eye. So-called "in- visible damages" have never been allowed by the Courts. The chemical analysis of leaves suspected to be poisoned deals only with an abnormal (unnatural) surplus of SO 3. All leaves contain, in nature, certain amounts of SO 3, the amoimts depending on the composition of the soil and on the species. Hence a comparative analysis of the leaves is absolutely necessary where it is intended to establish the influence of sulphurfumes on vegetation. This analysis must allow for the difference in the soil and the difference in the distance from the smelters. At the same time, the leaves examined must be taken from the same part of the tree and from the same side of the tree; further, the leaves must be in the same stage of development. After recent experiments the sulphuric contents in the leaves within .the lower part of the crown are much higher than the sulphuric contents in the upper part of the crown. The ashes obtained from trees growing in low lands are relatively poorer in SO 3 than the ashes from trees growing on mountains. Weak limbs show more SO 3 than strong limbs. The Merits of the Chemical Analysis. Science has not established any absolutely reliable means to connect death or injury of trees with a poisoning effect of SO 2 or SO 3 suspended in the air surroimding such trees. 144 FOREST PROTECTION An anatomic — microscopic proof of injury due to SO 2 or SO 3 can- not be given (Haselhoff and Lindau, p. 93 and p. 37). A number of injurious influences (frost, heat, desiccation of soil, insects, fungi (Schroeder and Reuss, p. 110) fire, etc.) bring about, within the leaves and needles, identical or similar al- terations of the cell-structure (Haselhoff and Lindau, p. 12 ff). The consensus of opinion, amongst scientific specialists (R. Har- tig, p. 6; Winkler, p. 379; Schroeder and Reuss, p. 126) is to the effect that excessive contents of SOs within the leaves are not necessarily injurious. Injury due to sulphurfumes can be assumed only when there are at hand A. death visible to the naked eye; B. no other plausible cause of such death; C. contents of SO 3 in the leaves which are unmistak- ably increased by the reaction of the leaves and needles on sulphur fiunes. Unmistakably increased contents of SOi proven chemically within the leaves are a. not identical with abnormal con- tents; b. not such contents as exceed the av- erage contents of leaves within territories acknowledged to be beyond the reach of sulphur fumes; in other words, c. not particularly high percentages of SOs found within the leaves. General averages holding good for the contents of SOs within the leaves of healthy tfees do not exist (Haselhoff and L ndau, p. 67). If the contents of SO 3 found within the in- jured or uninjured leaves and needles of a given tree exceed those obtained by averaging a large number of analytic re- sults obtained from the tests of healthy leaves and needles, then and in such case the excess is frequently due to any one, or to a combination of the following causes: , (a) Soil: A soil naturally rich in SO 3 or irrigated with water containing SOs, produces FOREST PROTECTION 145 leaves and needles sur- charged with SO 8. Such surcharge has no detrimen- tal influence on the state of health of the trees (Hasel- hoff and Lindau, p. 46, p. 51, p. 55, p. 56). (b) Age : Old needles contain more SO 3 than yoimg needles. (Haselhoff and Lindau, p. 67; Schroeder and Reuss, p. 128). (c) Season: Young leaves contain more SO 3 than old leaves. (d) Position: On the same healthy- tree, the sulphur contents of the leaves vary accord- ing to the position of the leaves,which position might be at the base or at the top of the crown, ' on the inside or on the outside of the crown. (e) Elevation: On the slope of a hill, the sulphur contents in the healthy leaves of the same tree-species exhibit variations depending on the elevation above sea-level (Schroeder and Reuss, p. 126). The sulphur contents of given leaves and need- les are "unmistakably increased" by the reaction on sulphur fumes in all cases where it can be proven that none of the causes of increase above enumerated has or have brought about such increase. It is advisable, as a consequence, (1) to back the chemical analysis of the leaves by the chemical analysis of the soil on which such leaves were produced, so as to prove that an in- 146 FOREST PROTECTION crease of leaf-sulphur is not due to an increase of soil- sulphur (Haselhoff and Lin- dau, p. 378); (2) to compare the analytic results of such leaves and needles only which were picked equally old; equally situated with- in the crown of the trees; equally situated with reference to eleva- tion. All experts agree that short, sudden, strong attacks by sulphur fumes are apt to be deadly; still, such attacks do not cause a VERY MABKED increase of SO 3 in the leaves. On the other hand, long-continued, but slight attacks by sulphur fumes result in a heavy increase of SO 3 in the leaves; still, such attacks do not cause a very marked injury to the trees (Wislicenus, Journal of Applied Chemistry, 1901, p. 28). It is evident, consequently, that conclusions based on the chemical analysis of leaves and needles are apt to be rash; and that so-called chemical proofs miist be viewed with great precaution (Wieler, p. 380). D. Unreliability of Glass-Case Experiments. Experiments touching the poisonous effect of fumes made with plants placed in a glass case cannot be so telling as experi- ments made in the open, because: a. In the glass case, the gas is admitted from below so as to infest the lower surface of the leaves, which lower surface is known to be more subject to sulphur attacks than the upper surface. b. Sulphurous anhydrid, in statu nascendi, is increas- ingly active and pre-eminently corrosive. c. The discoloration of the leaves in nature differs from the discoloration usually observed in glass case experiments. FOREST PROTECTION 147 d. In nature, SO 3 is largely mixed with SO 2, the former being less active than the latter. In the glass case, usually, only SO 2 is developed. E. Factors of Damase. Without a doubt, a slight admixture to the atmosphere of either SO 2 or SO 3 has a certain influence on vegetation; such in- fluence being irregularly proportioned to the amount of the admixture. After Stoeckhardt, the- one-millionth part of the air consisting of SO 2 results, in the course of time, in discoloration (335 fumi- gations discolor wet leaves in six weeks, dry leaves in eight weeks). The degree of injury depends on a. The continuity of the fumigation which is governed by the steadiness of the wind direction and which decreases, step by step, with increasing distance from the smelters. h. The sensitiveness of the plants which is governed by species, quality of the soil, preceding injury by fire, pasture or general neglect. c. The number of months per anniun during which the leaves show physical activity. In the case of hardwoods, this niimber is about 3J^, extend- ing from May 1 to August 15. d. Atmospheric conditions which may allow the gases to remain in bulk after emission from the smoke- stack, thus concentratmg the damage on such parts of the coimtry toward which the smoke happens to drift in hvlk. It has been proven by experiments as well as by the experience of all observers in natiire, that days of great atmospheric hu- midity, days on which fog forms and days following nights of heavy dew are particularly prolific in breeding acute dis- coloration or damage. On the other hand, very bright weather as well as heavy rains seem to minimize the damage by inten- - sive dilution and may prevent damage entirely. The toxic influence of sulphur gases might be considered either as an acute or as a chronic disease. Acute cases appear only in the near proximity of smelters where clouds of smoke kept in bulk under certain atmospheric constellations actually ex- ercise a corroding influence on the leaves. On the other hand, where the diluted gases are inhaled by the plants during a long number of days under the influence of a steady wind, there chronic discoloration and chronic disease will enter an appearance. 148 FOREST PROTECTION F. Damage to the Soil. Conclusive experiments prove that soluble sulphuric salts of cop- per (like blue vitriol) fail to cause any damage to the plants, whether applied in the form of dust or in the form of watery- solution. Very concentrated solutions, however, cause cor- rosion; also dust falling on leaves wet with dew. Although the roots of plants are unable to refuse entrance to dam- aging liquids, it has been found that soluble salts of copper, when entering the soil, form at once an insoluble chemical combination with the bases of the soil. It is possible, how- ever, that poor quartz-sand, in the immediate proximity of the smelters, can be affected by soluble salts of copper. Insoluble salts of copper are, obviously, harmless in the soil. Absolute proof for or against soil-poisoning can be obtained only by planting seeds and seedlings into soil supposed to be poi- soned, after removal to a point far from the smelters. Plant- ing experiments made by Reuss have failed to prove any posion- ing of the soil, even under extreme conditions. The sulphuric acid contained in the soil is by no means propor- tioned to the damage appearing in the trees. On the other hand, trees stocking on sulphuric soil (e. g. gypsum soil) show invariably a high percentage of sulphuric acid within the leaves. It seems as if sulphuric acid obtained through the roots is innocuous, whilst sulphuric acid inhaled through the leaves is noxious. If by condensation of the gases at the smelters the atmosphere is purified, the soil in the proximity of the smelters is as ready to produce as ever. In other words, there is no such thing as irreparable damage caused by smelterfumes. Experiments with plants watered with a solution of SO 2 prove conclusively that no damage results from such watering. On the contrary! After Freytag, plants watered with a solu- tion of SO 3 have shown better yields than those which were not watered with SO 2. In other words, sulphuric acid has a chance to become a blessing to agriciilture, especially where the soil contains insoluble phosphates; and there is, decidedly, no such thing as the "poi- soning of the soil" through SO 2 or SO 3, applied in gaseous form or liquid form, as salt or acid. G. Damage to Farm Crops and Fruit Trees. Within the vegetation economically used, farm crops suffer less from fumes than trees. In the case of farm crops potatoes seem to be least sensitive, cereals follow next, whilst legumi- nous plants are more sensitive. FOREST PROTECTION 149 Farming can be carried on remuneratively in closer proximity of the smelters than forestry. Obviously, in the case of annual plants, there is. no cumulative influence of SO 2 due to many a year's exposure. The fact that farm crops are more resistant to smoke than forest crops may be explained ,also, by the higher reproductive power of the former and by the greater height of the latter, the leaves of which are exposed to more concentrated gases of SO 2. In case of fruit trees, mulberries seem to be least sensitive; then follow apples, pears, peaches, plums, with cherries as the most sensitive fruit trees at the rear end. Wherever fruit trees are well attended by cultivation and by fer- tilizing, the damage by sulphur fumes is minimized. The "floral organs" of the fruit trees seem to be less affected by smoke than the "pulmonary organs," which means to say the fruiting of the trees is not badly interfered with by SO, and SO 3. H, Damage to Forests. The forest trees, according to species and individuality, exhibit a very varying degree of sensitiveness to the influence of sul- phur fumes. The degree of liability to damage is in no way proportioned to the readiness with which the trees inhale sul- phuric fimies. For instance, the conifers are more affected by sulphur fumes than are the hardwoods. Still, exposed to the same atmosphere charged with sulphuric fumes, the coni- fers will inhale smaller quantities of toxic gases than the hard- woods. The power of resistence which the various species show to the in- fluence of sulphur fumes is, on the other hand, directly pro- portioned to the power of reproduction (power of recovery) which the various species show. It is obvious that this power of recovery is particularly good in hardwoods, which must recover, every spring, from the natural loss of foliage sustained in the preceding fall. In the case of broad-leaved species, any loss of vital organs is readily made up, whilst in the case of conifers the reproductive power is comparatively low. Amongst the conifers, those which retain their needles for a num- ber of years are more apt to suffer from sulphuric fumes than those which retain their needles for one or two years only. Inasmuch as the resistence which the trees offer to injury by sul- phurfumes is proprotioned to their power of reproduction, and inasmuch as this power of reproduction largely depends on the fertility of the soil, it is obvious that all species suc- cumb on impoverished soil more rapidly than on good soil. 150 FOREST PROTECTION This observation is backed by the facts exhibited near Ducktown, Tenn., where the shade trees in the gardens seem to do re- markably well in close proximity to the smelters. Ceteris paribxis, the following schedule has been arranged as the result of investigations for the trees in the Ducktown region having over 7" diameter, the trees most easily kUIed by SO, being placed at the top of the schedule: Susceptibility to Actual Injury. White Pine Hemlock Scrub Pine Pitch Pine Birch Chestnut Hickory Oaks Yellow Poplar Maple Black Gum This schedule tallies well with the schedule given by European authors for closely related species. If a similar schedule is formed according to the ease of discolor- ation, entirely different results are obtained: Susceptibility to Discoloration. VERY easily medium NOT APT TO BE discolored discolored discolored Black Oak Poplar Black Gmn Hickory White Oak White Pine Scarlet Oak Chestnut Oak Maple Chestnut Post Oak Pitch Pine Spanish Oak Hemlock Noteworthy it is that the power of resistance to fumes is more increased by the power of reproduction than decreased by • the sensitiveness of the leaves. In nature, wherever grave deviations from exact schedules of sen- sitiveness are found, it stands to reason that other influences, aside from sulphurfumes, are simultaneously responsible for the death or for the discoloration of the trees. The best time for any observations in the forest is the late sum- mer or early fall (the time between August 15 and October 1). Sulphurfumes cannot be held responsible for the local death of trees within a "smoke region," (1) if species known to be more sensitive are less affected than species known to be more resistent; FOREST PROTECTION 151 (2) if tall specimens are no more affected than short specimens; or if the trees die from below; (3) if the dying trees are affected with a fungus-disease (e. g. White Pine blight and Chestnut blight) or an insect disease causing the death of the trees outside the smoke region; (4) if death and discoloration are confined to one species only; (5) if the owner of the forests, allowing indiscriminate logging, or allowing forest fires to rage, is guilty of contributory negligence; (6) if discoloration is caused by late frost, or draught, or leaf fungi; (7) if the death rate within the smoke region is no greater than the death rate without, under otherwise equal conditions (of geology, soil-fertility, as- pect, forest fires, desiccation, storms, insects, fungi and prior treatment of forests); (8) if dying and living trees are normally covered with tree mosses, algae and lichens; (9) if the death rate at the windward edge of the for- ests is not larger than the death rate in the in- terior; (10) if the size of the annual rings of accretion is not ab- normally small; (11) if there are at hand, in the affected region, other plausible causes of discoloration and of death. 1. Preventive Measures. 1. In the source of damage: (a) Dilution of fumes by emission into the upper atmosphere from mountain tops or from high smoke-stacks; by accelerated conversion of SO 2 into Sd; by artificial draught increasing the rapidity of dilution; by manufacture of sulphuric acid. (b) Other means suggested: by running smelter plants at night (possible in pygmean operations only); by discontinuing operations in May, Jvme and July (impossible where himdreds of workmen depend on continued employment); 152 FOREST PROTECTION by smelting in the regions where the hardwoods prevail; where the forest has little value; on islands; in deserts or prairies. 2. In woodlands adjoining: (a) Conversion of woodlands into farms or pastures; OJ of high forest into low forest; (b) Cutting affected and dying trees; (c) Maintaining the fertility and, notably, the water con- tents of the soil through protection from fire and by keeping a dense undergrowth; (d) Avoidance of partial logging. I. Index to Malefactors. Acanthocinus nodbsus Fab., 48. Acanthocinus obsoletus Oliv., 48. Acmceo pulchella Hbst., 57. Aecidium pint, 119. Aegeria acerni Clem., 88. AgaricacecB, 117. Agaricus melletis, 114, 119. Agrilus anxius Gory, 64, 65. Agrilus bilineatus Web., 67, 68. Agrilus otiosus Say, 73. alder 111. . Allorhina nitida Linn., 62. Ambrosia, 114. Ametabola, 21. Ampelopsis, 112. Andromeda, 111. animals, 12< Anisota rubicunda Fab., 88. Anisota senatoria S. & A., 85. Anisota stigma Fab., 85. Apatela americana Harr., 86, 88. Aphididce, 21, 29, 34, 101, 102, 103, 105, 106. Aphrophora paralella Say, 101. Apion nigrum Hbst., 73. Arceuthobium cryptopoda, 126. Arceuthobium ocddentale, 126. Arceuthobium pusiUum, 126. Archips fervidana Clem., 85. ArctiidcB, 21, 77, 82, 85, 86, 87, 88. Arhopalus fulminans Fab., 43, 67, 68. Ascomycetes, 116, 118. Asemum mcestum Hald., 43, 48, 50. Asemum nitidum Lee, 53, 54. Asilidce, 20. Aspidiotus pernidosus Comst., 104. Aspidioius tenebricosus Comst., 106. Asterolecanium variolosum Ratz., 104. Attelabus arialis, Web., 62. Automeris io Fab., 88. Azalea, 112. Balaninus, 67. Balaninus nasicus Say, 63, 68. Balaninus probosddus Fab., 67. Balaninus rectus Say, 63, 67. Basidiomycetes, 117. Basilona imperialis Dru., 77, 82. beaver, 18. beech. 111. Bellamira scalaris Say, 65. birds, 18. blackberry, 109, 111, 112. BlastobasidoE, 85. blueberry, 109. bluejay, 18. boar, wild, 15. Bombycidce, 21. Bostrichidce, 29, 34. box-elder, 109. Brachys ceruginosa Gory, 66. Brmthidoe, 21, 29, 33, 57, 66, 67, 68, 69. BuprestidcB, 21, 29, 32, 43, 48, 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 63, 65, 66, 67, 68, 73, 74. Buprestis apricans Hbst., 48. Buprestis aurulenta Linn., 43, 48, 50, 56. Callidium cereum Newm., 67. Callidium antennatum Newm., 48, 61. Callidium janihinum Lee, 59. Callipterus ulmifolii Monell, 105. Callosamia promethea Dru., 90. Camponotus herculeanus Linn., 97. Carabidce, 20. Carphoborus, 44, 47, 51, 54. caterpillars, Lepidopterous, 34. Catocala spp., 85. Ceddomyia carycecola O. S., 100. Ceddomyia clavula Beuten, 100. Ceddomyia holotricha O. S., 100. Ceddomyia liriodendri O. S., 100. Ceddomyia niveipila O. S., 100. Ceddomyia pilulce Walsh, 100. Ceddomyia pinirigidce Pack., 99. Ceddomyia poculum O. S., 100. Ceddomyia rednicola O. S., 99. Ceddomyia tubicola O. S., 100. Ceddomyia tulipifera O. S., 100. Ceddomyiidce, 21, 29, 99, 100. Cedar apples, 119. Cerambyddce, 21, 29, 32, 33, 35, 43, 45, 47, 48, 50, 52, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 61, 62, 63, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76. Ceratocampidce, 77, 82, 85, 88. Ceratogr aphis pusillus Kby., 48. Ceratomia amyntor Geyer, 86. Ceratomia catalpce Boisd., 91. Ceratomia undulosa Walk., 90. Ceratostomella pilifera, 123. Chaitophorus aceris Linn., 106. Chalddoidea, 20. 153 154 FOREST PROTECTION Chermes abietis Linn., 102. Cherm.es pinicortids Fitch., 101. Chermes sibiricus Chold., 102. Chermes strobi Hart., 101. Chion cinctus Dru., 63, 67, 68. Chionaspis americana Johns, 105. Chionaspis pinifolice Fitch., 101. chinquapin, 110, 111, 112. chipmunk, 16. Chalciphora virginiensis Dru., 43, 48, 50. Chramesus icorice Lee, 63. Chrysobothris dentipes Germ., 48. Chrysobothris femorata Fab., 63, 67, 68, 74. Chrysobothris Q-signata Say, 65. Chrysomela scalaris Lee, 75, Chrysomelidce, 21, 29, 48, 63, 68, 69, 73, 75. Cercopidce, 101. Cicada, 104, 106. Cicadidce, 21, 30, 35, 104, 106. Cicindelidoe, 20. Cimbex americana Leach, 97. Citheronia regalis Fab., 82. Clematis, 112. Clerida, 20. climbers, 112. Coccidce, 21, 29, 34, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106. Cocdnellidce, 20. Cochlidiidoe, 85. Coleoptera, 20, 21, 38, 43-76. Colopha ulmicola Fitch., 105. Colydiidce, 20. Componotus pennsylvanicus Deg., 94 Conotrachelus elegans Say, 63. Conotrachelus juglandis Lee, 62. Conotrachelus nenuphar Herbst., 63. Convolvulus, 110. Corthylus columbianus Hpk., 66, 68, 70. Corthylus punctatissimus Zm., 74. Cossidce, 21, 29, 85, 86, 87, 88. Cotalpa lanigera Linn., 64, 68. cotton woods, 111. Crepidodera rufipes Linn., 73. ' Cressonia juglandis S. & A., 82. cross-bills, 18. crows, 18. Cryphalus, 50, 55, 56. Cryptorhynchus, 67. Cryptorhynchus parochus Hbst., 62. Crypturgus atomus Lee, 43, 50. Crypturgus pusillus, 48. Curculionidce, 21, 29, 30, 32, 35, 36, 37, 43, 44, 48, 50, 51, 56, 57, 62, 63, 67, 68, 69, 73. Curius dentatus Newm., 57. Cynips spp., 96. Cyllene picta Dru., 63. Cyllene robince Forst., 73, 114, 121, Cynipidce, 30, 96. w;_-- i^.;^ Cynipoidea, 21, 29, ' ""'', damping-off, 120. ;\; . ^^j Dantana angusii G. & R., 85. , Dantana integerrima Dru., 82. Dantana ministra G. & R., 82, 83, 85, 89. deer, 15. Dendroctonus, 44, 45, 46, 47, 49. Dendroctonus approximatus Dtz., 47. Dendroctonus brevicomis Lee, 44, 47. Dendroctonus engelmanni Hopk., 51. Dendroctonus fontalis, 31, 43, 48, 50, 114. Dendroctonus monticolce Hopk., 44, 45, 46, 47. Dendroctonus obesus Mann., 48, 51. Dendroctonus piceaperda Hopk., 31, 50. Dendroctonus ponder osce Hopk., 47. Dendroctonus pseudotsu^a Hopk., 54, Dendroctonus similis Lee, 49, 54. Dendroctonus terebrans Oliv., 43, 48. Dendroctonus valens Lee, 43, 46, 47, 48. Diapheromera femorata Say, 108. Diaporthe parasitica Murrill, 120. Dicer ca lurida Fab., 63. Dicer ca obscura Fab., 63, 74. Dioryctria reniculella Grote, 78. Diptera, 20, 21, 38, 99, 100. Discomycetes, 116, 118. dogwood, 110, 111, 112. Dolurgus pumilis Mann., 51. doves, 18. Drepanosiphum acerifolii Thos., 106. drought, 114. Dryocartes, 43, 50. Dryocartes affaber Mann., 51. Dryocartes autoyraphus Ratz., 50. Dryocartes eichhoffi Hopk., 65. Dryocartes granicollis Lee, 50. Dryophilus, 59. Eburia quadrigeminata Say, 63, 76. Ecdytolopha insiticiana Zell., 87. Echinodontium tinctorium, 123. Elaphidion villosum Fab., 63, 68, 74. Elateridoe, 20, 21, 30. Enarmonia bracteatans Fern., 77. Enarmonia caryana Fitch., 82. INDEX TO MALEFACTORS 155 Epargyreus tityrus Fab., 87. Eraunis tiliaria Harr., 89. Er gates spiculatus Lee, 47, 48. Ericacoe, 110, 117. erosion, 138. Endocimus mannerheimii Boh., 57. Euclea delphinii Boisd., 85. Eulecanium tulipiferce Cook, 105. Eulia politana Haw., 77. Eunomos magnarius Guen., 84. Euproctis chrysorrhea Linn., 85. Eupsalis minuta Dru., 57, 66,' 67, 68, 69. Euschausia argentata Pack., 77. Euvanessa antiopa Linn., 86. Evetria comstockiana Fern., 77. Evetria frustrana Comst., 77. Evetria rigidana Fern., 77. Exoascece, 117. Exobasidium vaccinii, 117. ferns. 111,, 112. finches, 18. fire, 8, 114. Formiddce, 94, 97. Formicoidea, 20. frost, 127. fungi, 113, 115. Galerucella luteola Mull., 69. Gaurotes cyanipennis Say, 62. Gelechiidce, 77, 78. Geometridce, 78, 84, 86, 89. Glyptoscelis pubescens Fab., 48. Gnathotrichus, 47. Gnathotrichus materiarius Fitch., 43, 48, 50. Gnathotrichus sulcatus Lee, 53, 54, 55, 59. Goes oculatus Lee, 63. Goes pulchra Hald., 63. Goes pulverulentus Hid., 66. Goes tesselata Hald., 68. Goes tigrina DeG., 63, 68. Gossyparia spuria Mod., 105. grapevine, 109, 110. Graphisurus fasdatus DeG., 68. groimd-hog, 18. grouse, 18. Gryllidce, 30, 36, 107. Gryllotalpa borealis Burm., 107. Gryllus spp., 107. gum, black, 109, 110, 111, 112. Gymnosporangium, 119. Halesia {Mohrodendron) , 109, 111, 116. Halisidota caryce Harr., 82. Halisidota maculata Harr., 86. Halisidota tesselaris S. & A., 85, 86, 88 hazei, 112. hazel, witch, 109, 110. heat, 132. heather, 109. hedge-hog, 18. Hemerocampa leucostigma S. & A., 86, 87, 88, 89. Hemileuca maia Dru., 85. Hemimetabola, 21. Hemiptera, 20, 21, 38, 101-106. Hepialidce, 84, 87. Herpotrichia, 114. Hesperidce, 21. Heterocampa bilineata Pack., 89. Holcocera glandulella Riley, 85. Homoptera lunata Dru., 88. huckleberry. 111. Hylastes cavernosus Zimm., 43. Hylastes porosus Er., 47. Hylastinus rufipes Eichh., 69. HyleccBtus americanus Harr., 68, Hyleccetus lugubris Say, 67. Hylesinus, 53, 54, 55. Hylesinus aculeatus Say, 76. Hylesinus granulatus Lee, 55. Hylesinus nebulosus Lee, 54. Hylobius pales Hbst., 43, 48. Hylotrupes amethystinus Lee, 59. Hylotrupes ligneus Fab., 61. Hylurgops glabratus Zeff . , 43. Hylurgops pinifex Fitch., 48. Hylurgops rugipennis Mann., 51. Hylurgops subcostulatus Mann., 44, 45, 46, 47. Hymenomycetes, 117, 118. Hymenoptera, 20, 21, 38, 92-98. Hyphantria cunea Dru., 87, 90. Hyphantria textor Harr., 85. Hypoderma strobicola, 120. Hysterium pinastri, 119. Ichneumonoidea, 20. Incurvaria acerifoliella Fitch., 88. insects, 20. Isoptera, 107. Ithycerus noveboracensis Fst., 68. Janus integer Nort., 95. Kaliosphinga dohrnii Tischb., 95. Kaliosphinga ulmi Sund., 97. Kalmia, 109, 111, 112. Kermes, 104. Lachnus strobi Fitch., 101. Lagoa crispata Pack., 85. Lapara bombycoides Walk., 77. Lapara coniferarum S, & A., 77. 156 FOREST PROTECTION LasiocampidcB, 85, 88. Lecanium, 101, 103. Lecanium nigrofasciatum Prg., 106. Lenzites sepiaria, 123. Lepidoptera, 21, 29, 34, 38, 77-91. Leptostylus aculiferus Say, 70. Leptura canadensis Fab., 50, 52. Leucotermes flavipes KolL, 107. Liparidce, 21, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89. Lithocolletes hamadryella Clem., 85. Locustidce, 21, 108. Lophyrus abbotii Leach, 92. Lophyrus lecontei Fitch, 92. Lyctidce, 29, 34. Lyctus spp., 63, 76. Lyda, 92. LygoBonematus erichsonii Hart., 93. Lymexilonidce, 29, 33. Lymexylidce, 67, 68. Lymexylon sericeum Harr., 67, 68. Magdalis armicollis Say, 69. Magdalis barbata Say, 69. Magdalis olyra Herbst., 66. Malacosoma disstria Hubn., 85, 88. Mallodon dasystomus Say, 63, 68. Mallodon melanopus Linn., 68. man, 7. Mantidce, 20. maple, 111. Mecas inornata Say, 64. Megalopygidce, 85. Melandryidce, 50, 56. Melanophila, 49. Melanophila drummondi Kby., 63, 54. Melanophila fulvoguttata Harr., 52. Melasoma lapponica Linn., 64. Melasoma scripta Fab., 64. Metabola, 21. mice, 16. Microcentrum laurifolium Linn., 108. Mohrodendron {Halesia), 116. Monohammus confusor Kby., 48, 50. Monohammus scutellatus Say, 43, 45, 48. Mycelophilidoe, 100. Mytilaspis, 101, 103. Myxomycetes, 118. Nectria, 116. Nematus, 34. Nematus erichsonii, 35. Nematus integer Say, 94. Neoclytus caprcea Say, 76. Neoclytus erythrocephalus Fab., 57, 71, 74, 76. Neophasia menapia Feld., 77, 79. Neuroptera, 20. Noctuidce, 21, 29, 36, 85, 86, 88. Notodontidce, 82, 83, 85, 89. Nototophus antiqua Linn., 85. Nymphalidoe, 86. oak, black jack, 110. Odontota dorsalis Thunb., 73. Odontota rubra Web., 75. Odontota scutellaris Oliv., 73. Oecanthus pini Beut., 107. Oeme rigida Say, 57. Oncideres cingulata Say, 63, 68. Orthoptera, 20, 21, 38, 107, 108. Orthosoma brunneum DeG., 48. Pachylobius picivorus Germ., 43, 48. Pachyta monticola Rand, 56. Paleacrita vernata Peck, 86. Pantographia limata G. & R., 89. PapilionidcB, 21. Paralechia pinifoliella Cham., 77. Parharmonia pini, Vrell., 77. pasturage, 12. Paururus hopkinsi Ashm., 92. Paururus pinicola Ashm., 92. Pemphigus tessellatus Fitch., 103. Peridermium strobi, 119. Peronosporece, 116, 117. Peziza, 117. Phasmidce, 21, 108. Phenacoccus acericola King, 106. Philedia punctomacularia, 78. Phlarosinu^, 57. Phlarosinus cupressi Hopk., 58, 60. Phlarosinus dentatus Say, 61. Phlarosinus punctatus Lee, 59, 60. Phlarosinus sequoice Hopk., 58, 59. Phoradendron flavescens, 126. Phycitidce, 30, 37, 77, 78. Phycomycetes, 116. Phylloxera pallida Linn., 64. Phymatodes decussatus Lee, 58. Phymatodes variabilis Linn., 64. Physcenemum andrece Hald., 57. Phytophtora omnivora, 116. Pieridce, 77, 79. Pinipestis zimmermanni Grte., 77. pigeons, 18. Pissodes, 44. 51. Pissodes dubius Rand, 56. Pissodes strobi Peck, 43, 48, 50. Pityogenes, 43, 45, 55. Pityogenes carinulatus Lee, 47. Pityogenes cariniceps, 47. Pityogenes plagiatus Lee, 48. Pityophthorus, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, 50, 55, 65. Pityophthorus cariniceps Lee, 50. INDEX TO MALEFACTORS 157 Pityophthorus confinis Lee, 47. PUyophthorus minutissimus Zimm., 68. Pityophthorus nitidulus Mann., 45, 51, 54. Pityophthorus pruinosiis Eichh., 68. Pityophthorus pubipennis Lee, 68. Pityophthorus puncticollis Lee, 45, 47, 51. Pityophthorus guerdperda Schw., 68. Plaqionotus speciosus Say, 74. Platypus, 43, 53, 54. Platypus compositus Say, 57, 67, 68. Polygonia interrogationis Fab., 86. Polygraphus rufipennis Kby., 50. Polyporacece, 117. Polyporvs annosus, 120. Polyporus applanatus, 122. Polyporus betulinus, 122. Polyporus carneus, 121. Polyporus catalpce, 121. Polyporus fomentarius, 122. Polyporus fraxinophilus, 121. Polyporus fulvus , 122. Polyporus igniarius, 122. Polyporus juniperinus, 121, Polyporus libocedris, 122. Polyporus nigricans, 122. Polyporus obtusus, 122. Polyporus pergamenus, 122. Polyporus pinicola, 122, 123. Polyporus ponderosus, 123. Polyporus schweinitzii, 121. Polyporus sguamosus, 122. Polyporus sulfur eus, 122. Polyporus rimosus, 114, 121. Polyporus versicolor, 121. porcupine, 18. Porthetria dispar, Linn., 85. Prionoxystus robinice Peck., 85, 87. Prionus laticollis Dru., 48, 64 67 68. ' ' . Proctotrypoidea, 20. Pseudococcus aceris Goeff., 106. Psychidce, 81. Psyllidce, 29, 34. Pterocyclon fasdatum Say, 57. Pterocyclon mali Fitch., 50, 57, 66 68, 72. Pteronus ventralis Say, 95. Ptilinus ruficornis Say, 74. Ptinidce, 21, 29, 32, 34. PtininidcB, 47, 59, 63, 74, 76. Pulvinaria innumerabilis Rathv 106. *^ PyralidoB, 89. Pyrenomycetes, 116, 118. Recurvaria obliquestrigella Cham., 78. ReduviidcB, 20. Rhagium lineatum Oliv., 43, 48, 50. Rhizococcus, 101, 102. Rhododendron, 112. sand, shifting, 139. Saperda, 72. Saperda calcarata Say, 64. Saperda concolor Lee, 64. Saperda discoidea Fab., 63. Saperda tridentata Oliv., 69. Saperda vestita Say, 75. Saturniidce, 82, 83, 85, 88, 89, 90. ScarabcddoB, 21, 29, 36, 62, 68, 76. Schizoneura imbricator Fitch., 103. Sciara ocellata O. S., 100. Scolytidce, 21, 29, 31, 33, 35, 43-61, 63, 65-70, 72, 74-76. Scolytus, 50, 55. Scolytus prceceps Lee, 55. Scolytus quadrispinosus Say, 63. Scolytus rugulosus Ratz., 72. Scolytus subscaber Lee, 55. Scolytus unispinosus Lee, 49, 54. Schizoneura americana Riley, 105. Schizophyllum commune, 123. sedge, broom, 16. sedge-grass, 109. Selandria diluta Cress., 96. Serica trociformis Burm., 68. Serropalpus barbatus Schall., 50, 56. Sesiidce, 29, 77, 80, 88. Sinoxylon basilare Say, 63. Siriddce, 29, 92, 94, 96, 98. sleet, 134. smilax, 109. snow, 134. Sphingidce, 77, 82, 86, 90, 91. Sphinx Kalmice S. & A., 90. squatters, 7. squirrels, 16. Sthenopis argenteomaculatus Harr., 84. storm, 114, 136. sulphur fumes, 141. sunscald, 133. Symmerista albifrons S. & A., 85. Syrphidce, 20, 21. Systena marginalis 111., 63. Telea polyphemus Cram., 82, 83, 85, 88, 89. Tenthredinidce, 29, 34, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97. Termitidce, 107. Tetr opium dnnamopterum Kby., 50. 158 FOREST PROTECTION Thyridopteryx ephemerceformis Haw. 81. Tibicen septendedm Linn., 104, 106. Tillandsia usneoides, 126. Tineidce, 29, 35, 85, 88. Tomicus, 45, 50, 55. Tomicus avulsus Eichh., 43, 48. Tomicus halsameus Lee, 50, 56. Tomicus cacographus Lee, 43, 48, 50. Tom,icus ccelatus Eichh., 43, 48. Tomicus calligraphus Germ., 43, 47, 48. Tomicus condnnus Mann., 51. Tomicus confusus Lee, 47. Tomicus integer Eichh., 46, 47. Tomicus latidens Lee, 44. Tomicus m,onticola Hopk., 44. Tomicus oregoni Eichh., 47. Tom,icus pini Say, 43, 46, 48, 50. Tortriddoe, 29, 30, 35, 37, 77, 78, 82, 85, 87. Tortrix fum/iferana Clem., 78. Tortrix querdfoliana Fitch., 85. Trachinidce, 20. Tram,etes pini, 120. Trametes radidperda, 114, 120. Tremex columba Linn., 96, 98. Trichosphceria, 114. Trogositidce, 20. Trypodendron, 65. Trypodendron bivittatum Mannh., 48, 50, 51, 52. Trypodendron fasdatum Say, 74. Trypodendron mali Fitch., 74. turkey, wild, 18. Uredinece, 117. Urocerus abdominalis Harr., 94. Urocerus albicornis Fab., 94. Urocerus flavipennis Kby., 94. Urographis fasdatus Horn., 62, 63, 67, 68, 71, 74. Usnea barbata, 126. Ustilaginece, 117. Vacdnium, 112. Vespamima sequoia Hy. Edw., 77, 80. Vespoidea, 20. Vitis, 112. weeds, 109. windstorm, 136. woodchuck, 18. woodpeckers, 18. Xyleborus, 57. Xyleborus, ccelatus Zimm., 50, 74. Xyleborus celsus Eichh., 63, 68. Xyleborus dispar Fab., 70. Xyleborus fuscatus Eichh., 68. Xyleborus obesus Lee, 52, 68, 74. Xyleborus politus Say, 50, 66, 74. Xyleborus pubesceus Zimm., 48, 67, 74. Xyleborus saxeseni Ratz., 52, 54, 63, 64, 66, 68, 72, 74. _ Xyleborus tachygraphus Zimm., 70, 74. Xylochinus, 50, 56. Xylotrechus colonus Fab., 63, 67, 68, 74. Xylotrechus undulatus Say, 52, 54, 55. . ^ Zeuzerafpyrina Linn., 86, 87, 88. ZygoenidcB, 21.^ I II. Index of Species Affected. Abies balsamea, 56. Abies concolor, 55. Abies fraseri, 56. Abies grandis, 55. Acer, 74, 88, 98, 100, 106. Alnus, 103, 111. Alnus glutinosa, 95. Arbor-vitse, 121. ash, white, 121, 122, 133. basswood, 18. beech, 18, 121, 122, 129, 133. Betula, 65, 83. birch, 18, 122, 150. black gum, 129, 150. buffalo-nut, 16. Castanea, 67, 84. Catalpa, 91, 121, 129. cedar, incense, 122. \ Chamcecyparis, 61. . Chamcecyparis lawsoniana, 60. cherry, 16, 122, 128. chestnut, 19, 109, 120, 129, 133, 150. conifers, 107, 119, 120, 122. - Cornus florida, 100. Cottonwood, 18, 122, 129, 139. Cratcegus, 16. currant, 119. cypress, bald, 114, 122. Douglas fir, 121, 129. Fagus, 66, 103. fir, 16, 17^120. fir, Douglas, 121. fir, red, 123. Fraxinus, 76, 90. hazel, 18. hemlock, (see Tsuga), 18, 121, 123, 131, 150. hemlock, western, 121, 123. hickories, 17, 129y 135, 150. Hicoria, 63, 82, 100, 103.^ Incense cedar, 122. Juglans, 62, 103. Juniperus, 81. Juniper us virginiana, 61. Kalmia, 18. Larix, 93. Larix occidentalis, 49. linden, 16. Liquidambar, 71. Liriodendron, 70, 100, 105, 129. locust, 16, 17, 114, 121, 135. maple, 16, 18, 122, 128, 129, 150. oak, 16, 17, 19, 121, 122, 129, 150. oak, chestnut, 128, 150. oak, scarlet, 18, 150. oak, white, 18, 150. Picea, 50, 51, 78, 94, 102. Picea engelmanni, 51. Picea pungens, 16. Picea sitchensis, 16, 51. pine, 16, 120, 135, 139. pine, seedlings, 119, 131. pine, white, 119, 131, 133, 150. pine, yellow, 109. Pinus, 76, 92, 99, 101. Pinus cembra, 119. Pinus echinata, 16, 48, 129, 130. Pinus flexilis , 45. Pinus jeffreyi, 47. Pinus lambertiana, 44, 129. Pinus monticola, 45, 121. Pinus murrayana, 46. Pinus palustris, 48. Pinus ponderosa, 47, 123, 129. Pinus resinosa, 48. Pinus rigida, 48, 129, 150. Pinus strobus, 43, 120, 129, 130, 131. Pinus tceda, 48. poplar, 122. poplar, yellow, 109, 115, 135, 150. Populus, 64, 95. Pseudotsuga, 54. Pyrularia, 16. Pyrus, 72. Quercus, 68, 85, 96, 100, 103. red-cedar, 18, 119, 121. Rhododendron, 18. Ribes, 119. Robinia, 73, 87. Sequoia, 58, 80. Sequoia sempervirens , 123. spruce, (see Picea), 18, 123, 129, 130, 131, 133. Taxodium distichum, 57. Tilia, 75, 89. Tsuga, 79. Tsuga canadensis, 52. Tsuga heterophylla, 53. Thuja gigantea, 59. Ulmus, 69, 86, 97, 105. walnut, 122, 128, 129, 130. willow, 139. 159 95? ^^' .. ^. .^.., , 0^ , V . ^ "^^ ' ^ o ^^^^^^ 4^v, ^mj C- .-^ \ •v^ «>••"* -V-^^" >^ . -x^ •^OO^ C-a -^ ^^^ v^ _"C A' '\^ ■"^x ^"^ '>^ ^^*i ^^ " I 0' V , V 1 <. ;/ I \ - \ \-' ,.' > X„ r ^^ ^^ r\^ 0-^ ^ l.'^' ci', - ^ r^ .. n ^ ^.. >^ * \0o. •-y ->^ ^^. '^ \^ c.'^' V ,^^ A^ ■°'^-^> -^oo^ . ^'^'^-\ii*^ ■ o- .•'■ • •'•,t;'rr;,,;r'.'.'iw ^^wr*-'. ^. ■•'•'•■'■', .^y;;■■!i'•:;^'^c;v:i^^: "!--'^^tt! -;;-:;.i; •!;'•'>? : .v>' ■••';. ', ,■•.'..•;' :..V •..;>.! ',1 >i»,A'.'. ":^:;.<-"-->:.:;-;:;:'f^;:c;.'^ ,'.l7 K*::r.