HON. DANIEL BARNARD 
 
 A MKMOUIAL ADOKESS BY 
 
 HON. HENRY ROBINSON, 
 
 OF CONCORD, N. H. 
 
 DELIVEKEl) BEFORE 
 
 THE GRAFTON AND COOS BAR ASSOCIATION, 
 
 .Jam AHY 29, 1^92. 
 
 I'KINTKIJ A 1 < t)H<)8 8TKAM I'KESS, WfiODSVILLE, N. II. 
 
i 
 
^ 
 
 >^S'^'^:> 
 
 ci^i?^?^ 
 
 ^.a^^ \ 
 
HON. DANIEL BARNARD 
 
 A MKMOKl.U, ADDUKSS liV 
 
 HON. HENRY ROBINSON, 
 
 OF CONCORD, N. H. 
 
 DKF.IVKHED HKFOKK THE 
 
 GRAFTON AND COOS BAR ASSOCIATION 
 
 Jaxuahy 20, 1802. 
 
 PRINTED AT C'OllOS STKAM I'KK.SS, MiJOUSVILLE, N. H. 
 

 
HON. DANIEL BARNARD, 
 
 A MEMOUIAL ADDliESS, HV 
 
 HON. HENRY ROBINSON, OF CONCORD. 
 
 Mr. President, (ukI QpntleniPii of the (ivafton and Coos 
 Bar Association : — 
 
 There is no defenre when Deatli is elaiinant. Then, no 
 demurrer prevails, no bill of exceptions is allowed, no points 
 remain upon which to move for a review. All objections are 
 overruled. The judgment is absolute, irrevocable. When 
 the final process-server appears, even sheriffs succumb, and 
 trial lawyers who have seemed almost invincible, vield orra- 
 ciously as a helpless child to the universal judgment against 
 humankind, a judgment that cannot be vacated or avoided, a 
 judgment the execution of which can be satisfied only with 
 the whole debt of life. Jurists the ablest, and counsellors 
 whose experience is the longest, whose advice is the best, are 
 utterly powerless to meet the dread emergency of such a 
 case. 
 
 V Not many years ago gathered at the Merrimack countv 
 bar a group of very superior men. It was pronounced the 
 ablest and best association of lawyers in the State, and was 
 unexcelled anywhere in New England. 
 
 Ira Perley, that great genius of legal acumen, was there. 
 He was one of the brightest intellects of his day. Henry 
 A. Bellows, generous-hearted as he was learned, with a 
 beautiful character that lit his face as with sunshine, was 
 counted in its remarkable membership. He could have been 
 
— 4— 
 
 as eminent in the })ulpit as he was at the bar, and his life as 
 a lawyer, a judge, and a ehief-justice was as pure and noble 
 as it could possibly have been in the most exalted ministry. 
 Josiah JVIinot, keen, deep, retiring, but ready with resources, 
 and girded with the faculty of success, made one of that 
 illustrious circle. Jonathan E. Sargent, ripe with experience 
 at tiie bar and on the bench, with a mind stored with legal 
 lore, was one of the central figures. Asa Fowler, a compre- 
 hensive scholar, an apt technical draughtsman, and an erudite 
 counsellor, also stood in the fore-front of his profession. The 
 venerable George W. Nesmith, wliose integrity and impartial- 
 ity became proverbial, was one of the gems in that brilliant 
 crown of manly strength and possibility. There was no com- 
 panion more charming, no friend more hospitable, no attor- 
 ney more persistent, no citizen of social instincts with more 
 sparkling and infatuating conversational powers than Anson 
 8. Marshall. Grand old Mason W. Tappan was there, 
 rough and yet susceptible as a child, deep read in literature, 
 and with a wonderful knowledge of human natiu'e ; he was 
 an earnest advocate, one of the most effective that ever 
 graced the state. Perhaps the most active and indomitable 
 element in that magnificent assembly was John H. George, 
 who made his client's cause his own, and characterized every 
 imdertaking with the force, energy and unflinching courage 
 of his own imperious nature. Noble John Y. Mugridge 
 was there, public-spirited, buoyant, the especial champion of 
 younger men, one of the best all-round lawyers that ever 
 entered a court-room. Austin F, Pike sat with the others, 
 deep thinker, skillful lawyer, general student, and a wide 
 reader, and, besides, there was Charles P. Sanborn, with his 
 clear, calm, logical mind, his easy, popular manner ; A. F. L. 
 Norris, persevering, industrious, a pioneer in judicial knowl- 
 edge, a veteran in forensic experience, whose goodly fame 
 
— 5— 
 
 only lialf equalled his merits ; William T. Norris, painstak- 
 inpr, careful, sincere, and beloved ; Charles C. Lund, versa- 
 tile, scientific and valuable in diiferent branches of useful- 
 ness ; John M. Shirley, with a memory re|)lete with prece- 
 detit, a cultured taste, and a piipinut wit and sparklinf; orij^- 
 inality which made him a potent force in athiirs ; Hamilton E. 
 Perkins, genial, polite, with a i)repo8se8sing suavity of speech, 
 and an equanimity of teuq)er that won him friends every- 
 where ; William ^^^ Flanders, in whom the elements were 
 gently mixed, honest, faithful, tolerant, diligent; Nehemiah 
 Butler, the embodiment of stability, prudence and faithful 
 adherence to duty; Aaron Whittemore, Jr., voung, hand- 
 some, held in uncommon esteem, and with everv element 
 favorable to the best success ; Arthur Fletcher, with fine 
 business qualifications, splendid mental force, and wonder- 
 ful tenacity of purpose ; Warren Clark, amiable, trustvvorthv, 
 upright, whose crown of glory was the eminent good sense 
 that pervaded his whole career. 
 
 We buried another, Willinm M. I^arnard, a beautiful 
 young man, whom we all loved. Early in life he showed 
 an es|)ecial ada])tation to the legal profession, but hardly had 
 he entered ujion a practice of surprising success and promise 
 when he wiis called l)ehind the veil of mystery. As we paid 
 tribute to him in the court-room, his father walked backward 
 and forward in front of the building, unable to bear the 
 tender allusions to his partner in business, his own son, 
 whom he love<l so fondly, and in whom were clustered such 
 fond h')j)es. And now that indulgent father himself who 
 sacrificed so much and strove so hard to bring up aright and 
 educate his children, unshrinking has passed, as Ingers(»ll 
 said of Conkling, "beyond our horizon, bevond the twi- 
 light's jjurple hills, beyond the reach of human harm or help. 
 
—6— 
 
 to that vast realm of silence or joy, where the innumerable 
 dwell." 
 
 These departed lawyers were the Websters, the SuUivans, 
 the Bells, the Woodburys, the Jeremiah Smiths, the Icha- 
 bod Bartletts of our day and generation, and worthy suc- 
 cessors they were indeed of those illustrious founders of our 
 jurisprudence. They were roundly equipped in intellectual 
 attainment ; they were beacons in our social fabric, promo- 
 ters of reform, friends of education, framers of legislation, 
 encouragers of industrial enterprise, leaders in politics, busy 
 men of affairs, mainstays of the community, important fac- 
 tors in the world's progress, but, one by one (I have not 
 named them in the order of their departure) they receded 
 from our sight to be gathered to their fathers, to become 
 mere clods which the rude swain might turn with his share 
 and tread upon, or wiser than kings. Able and upright in- 
 deed should be those who wear their mantle of honor, who 
 have donned the armor of their responsibility. 
 
 There was among them no gentler spirit, no clearer intel- 
 lect, no lawyer more efficient and serviceable, no worker more 
 faithful, no man more loveable than Daniel Barnard. Let us 
 believe that he has awakened "like a child in the daylight's 
 gleam." Ilis character requires no glowing setting ; he was 
 a true gem. It is not necessary to entwine his memory with 
 any wreath of oratory ; there is eloquence in his very name. 
 His life is an example of fidelity, industry and usefulness. 
 He was himself a sentiment of cheerfulness wherever he 
 went, of geniality, of good-natiu-e, of hopefulness, yet his 
 was the pathos of genuine sympathy ; his atmosphere always 
 that of kindliness and courage. As Phillips Brooks said of 
 Abraham Lincoln, "He possessed the greatness of real 
 iroodness, and the ofoodness of real greatness." 
 
 Hie career needs no gilding of words, the principal 
 
_7_ 
 
 eventt! of it arc fiuniliar to our pco})lc. We stop beside his 
 grave to-day only to express deep regret at his death, and to 
 })ay a tribute in simple and sincere language to his work and 
 worth, a tribute that conies spontaneously from the heart. 
 Every grief tears open afresh every other grief, yet, let us 
 not mourn for the dead, but, as Charles Sumner bade us, re- 
 joice in their lives and examples. There was no dross in 
 Daniel Barnard's character ; he was pure gold. He left us too 
 recently to be weighed yet in cold thought ; it is still too early 
 to analyze his merits ; but in the affection of close fellowship 
 we speak of him as we feel toward him, running the inno- 
 cent risk of overpraise. It is hard to believe that that rest- 
 less, energetic, magnetic force that we called and knew as 
 Daniel Barnard, is gradually to merge itself with other 
 forces, and in time cease to assert its individual ])owcr. 
 Lord Lytton, in "Night and Morning," pronounced it a 
 strange thing that that very form which we prized so chari- 
 ly, for which we prayed the winds to be gentle, which we 
 lapped from the cold in our ai'ms, from whose footstep we 
 would have removed a stone, should be suddenly thrust out 
 of sight ! And this same composition of bone and muscle 
 that was yesterday so strong, — which men resijccted and 
 women loved, and children clung to, — to-day so lamentably 
 powerless, unable to defend or protect those who lay nearest 
 to its heart ! A breath from its \i\)8 making all that mighty 
 difference between what it was and what it is. 
 
 Daniel Barnard had nothing of the eccentricitv of genius. 
 The secret of his success was work. The lesson of his life 
 was diligence, charity and consistency. The machinery of 
 his make-up was held in even motion by the balance-wheel 
 of sound principle and well-defined convictions of duty. 
 The modest estate in worldly goods that he left, and the imi- 
 versal grief that overshadowed the whole state at his sudden 
 
— 8— 
 
 death are tuuchmg testimonials to his honesty and self-sacri- 
 fice. There is no higher, no better, no grander type of 
 manhood on earth than an able, cultured, upright, trust- 
 worthy lawyer. Such was Daniel Barnai'd. No citizen can 
 be 80 helpful and comforting to his fellow citizens, such a 
 solace and support to his brother men in trouble as a clear- 
 headed, calm-souled, sympathetic and experienced counsellor. 
 Such was Daniel Barnard. 
 
 He rounded a splendid succession as attorney-general, that 
 comprises the names of Mason W. Tappan, of Lewis W. 
 Clark, of William C. Clarke, of the Sullivaus, of John S. 
 Wells, of Samuel Bell, of Jeremiah Mason, and others, a 
 single file of forensic giants, reaching down to us, men pon- 
 derous in intellect, replete in wisdom, and unswerving in rec- 
 titude. 
 
 Daniel Barnard in his last official position especially enti- 
 tled himself to our respect and regard. The duties of the 
 office are important, difficult and delicate. They call for 
 learning and ability, })rudence and much mildness and firm- 
 ness. All these qualities he had. There was in him no sem- 
 blance of the hardheartedness of an unfeeling public prose- 
 cutor. It was obvious that his fidelity to the state and his 
 obligations to the innocent made him demand punishment for 
 the guilty. He was sure to discover all the weak points in 
 the case of a respondent, sure to bring out the full facts a- 
 gainst him, but he was evidently pleased if the accused could 
 show himself innocent. He was not vain of convictions ; 
 he took no pride in pursuing wrong-doers, except as far as 
 it became his mission and duty. Nobody dared to offer him 
 a bribe ; he was above the suggestion of corruption. On 
 his hands was no smell of pitch. Insinuation, that foul 
 bird of disparagement, never brooded over his good name. 
 He stood erect and unsuspected ; his honesty was never ques- 
 
tloiu'd. lie was never a persceutor, and as a public pros- 
 ecutor he seeujcd a just father to tlie state rather than a 
 .tjovcrnuient officer. As we look back over his career now, 
 we see what nice discernment, what fine discretion, he ex- 
 ercised as to what suits should be brou<rht and what should 
 not. We see with what sagacity and ability, and satisfac- 
 tion to the people and credit to himself he conducted the re- 
 sponsible duties of nn office that requires uncommon qualifi- 
 cations. AVe begin to realize the magnitude of our loss. 
 In the language of Mr. Webster in reference to Chief- 
 Justice Jay, when the spotless ermine of the judicial roljc 
 fell on him it touched nothing less spotless than itself. 
 
 ^Vc reuiember how kind he was to young men, how cour- 
 teous and polite and popular he was to everybody on every 
 occasion everywhere. It was from the conflict of elements 
 that comes forth the desirable, and I have sometimes thought 
 that the intellectual battles that men wage at the bar serve to 
 develop their best, as well as to uncover their w^orst qualities. 
 Tliere was nothing sinister about Daniel Barnard. 1 do not 
 remember ever having seen him lose his temper. When the 
 most important cases were at stake, wdien everything seemed 
 pivoted as it were upon a single phase of a trial, he never 
 lost his self control. He cherished no enmities. lie forirot 
 when he forgave. He desfjised meanness and hated crimi- 
 nality, but he pitied weakness and never ridiculed ignorance. 
 He was not a talebearer of others' failings and prated not 
 of their misfortunes. He dealt in no scandals. He never 
 thought to build himself u[) by berating others, and it is 
 very deplorable incleed that so estimable and exemplary a 
 man and officer has left us forever. He was, take it all in 
 all, a charming gentleman. He died as he had wished to go, 
 with the harness on. He died with his books open ; he died 
 with his ])apcrs ai'ouiid him. Suddenly he stepped out of 
 
—10— 
 
 busy life where he vvus a most iin[)ortant factor, and left un- 
 finished and unguarded various interests that had learned to 
 look up to him as invaluable and indispensable. He left us 
 before any of his faculties had begun to fail, while yet he 
 was in the prime and glory of his existence. He went 
 with characteristic quickness and promptness, without any 
 lingering sickness. Just as his hair was silvered over, even 
 before the noonday splendor of his capability had begun to 
 dim, he was called away. "When the sun fades away at 
 nightfall we behold the harmonious fulfillment of nature's 
 law ; but when darkness comes at noonday we are struck with 
 awe at the mysteries of the universe. When eternity beck- 
 ons to one whose labors are ended here, and who walks wear- 
 ily under the burden of years, we see him sink down to his 
 rest with resignation to the decrees as they are written ; but 
 when death claims the great and strong, in all their pride of 
 })ower and place, we break forth in grief, and question the 
 ways of Heaven and earth, which are past finding out." 
 
 Charles Sumner said when the martyred Lincoln died, "In 
 the universe of God there are no accidents ; from the fall of 
 a sparrow to the fall of an empire or the sweep of a planet, 
 all is according to Divine Providence whose laws are ever- 
 lasting." 
 
 The air has been thick with death for many weeks. 
 
 "His flying shafts 
 Strike down to-day the bravest in the land; 
 
 And here and there, how suddenly he wafts 
 His fatal arrows. Nor can long withstand 
 'I'he mailed warrior, or the statesman manned, 
 Against him. But why should he hasten on 
 
 * * * to strike one down 
 
 Just in the zenith of his strength and glory of renown?" 
 
 But we are told that death cannot long lead the procession 
 that has passed oyer the silent river, for the tramp of innu- 
 
—11— 
 
 mcrable footsteps echo far l)ov<)n(l his sphere. "Tis said tliat 
 he knows not more tlian wo their distant iioal. lint God 
 who made tlieni knows and will not leave them on their toil- 
 some and doubtful march, either to wander in infinite nneer- 
 tainty, or to perisli by the way. 
 
 We have felt with Natiianiel Hawthorne that it is very sin- 
 ocular how the fact of a man's death seems often to give people 
 a better idea of his character, whether for i>'ood or evil, than 
 they have ever possessed while he was living and acting 
 among them. Death is so Pennine a fact that it excludes 
 falsehood or [)ortrays its emptiness. It is a touchstone that 
 pi'oves the gold and dishonors the baser metal. 
 
 No man has been held in higher respect and esteem than 
 Daniel Barnard by his fellow men, and now that he is dead 
 his character stands out in bold relief, and we appreciate and 
 prize his excellence as we never did before. lie was not 
 only the friend of his professional brcthi-en and of other 
 prominent men, but of the conunon pcoj)lc ; the humblest 
 and the poorest counted him as a benefactor, and felt glad to 
 press his hand in recognition of his kindly salutation and 
 sympathy, and many were the noiseless charities that he dis- 
 pensed. 
 
 "God give us men ; a time lilte ttiis demands 
 Strong minds, great hearts, true faitli, and reaciy iiands; 
 Men whom the lust of office does not liill ; 
 Men wliom the spoils of ollioe cannot buy ; 
 Men who have honor; men who will not lie; 
 ****** * 
 
 Tall men, ^un crowned, wlio live above the fog 
 In public dutj- and in private thinking." 
 
 Daniel Barnard never felt himself above anybody, lie was 
 not to be flattered, wheedled, or intimidated, l)ut he was pleased 
 with appreciation, and loved to meet the approxal of his fel- 
 low citizens. There was nothing of pomp or vanity about 
 
—12— 
 
 him. He did up a good, clean life's work, and left a record 
 that is the best encomium that could be pronounced. He 
 had an ingenius, intuitive mind. It had been trained by long 
 experience in the ramifications of a broad practice that cov- 
 ered in its extensive scope almost every trade and profession, 
 and he was naturally alert, naturally quick of discernment, 
 with not a particle of the inertia of laziness or indisposition 
 in his constitution. He was well informed; fully abreast of 
 the times on all subjects. He was vivacious, energetic, un- 
 tiring, and yet tolerant, patient and uncomplaining. He 
 never gave up until the end came. He loved fun ; saw the 
 ridiculous side, could tell a good story, and was a good lis- 
 tener. His agreeable personage will be missed at the rail- 
 way stations and the hotels ; his welcome face will be seen 
 no more on the cars ; he will be missed in our courts, in our 
 social gatherings, at our political conventions, wherever men 
 meet to confer and do congregate for legitimate purposes and 
 to cope with the momentous concerns of life, there Daniel 
 Barnard will be sorely missed. His advice was alwaj's good ; 
 he saw at a glance the pivotal point upon which a question 
 turned. He acquired the faculty of lucid statement and co- 
 gent argument. Pie gave to every case and to every critical 
 phase of it his best, most careful consideration and research. 
 His fortunate temperament allowed him to carry on his mind 
 a great burden of business, public and private, that would 
 have overwhelmed an ordinary attorney, or one upon whom 
 it came suddenly. There seemed to be before him many 
 years of usefulness and progress, years of comfort and enjoy- 
 ment, but in the lottery of death there are no blanks, and 
 suddenly, unexpectedly to him as to us all, he solved the 
 greatest problem of life. His virtues were worthy of emu- 
 lation. He iiad great sagacity and tact, swift perceptions, 
 and was ready to decide and to act. As Attorney-General, 
 
—1 3— 
 
 he hiul IK) pet policy to enrry out. exee|tt the poliev of dis- 
 cretion and riofht. A friend of the author of the cniaiieipa- 
 tion proehunation once joked him ahout tlie |)rociirin2; of an 
 ordinary lawyer to ])reside over a <r\-e:\t nation throu^ii one 
 of the most terrihle civil rebellions that ever arose, Mr. 
 Lincoln replied with the greatest gravity: "I don't believe 
 any great man with a policy could have saved the country ; 
 if I have contributed to that end it has been because I have 
 attended to the duties of each day with the hope that when 
 to-morrow came I should be equal to its duties also."' 
 
 Daniel Barnard had to do Avith the organization of the 
 Unitarian church in Franklin, and remained one of its most 
 earnest and generous supporters. He was modest always in 
 his own oi)inions, and did not attempt to impress his relio-- 
 ious views upon others. lie believed more especially in im- 
 proving, enriching and ennobling life and character here, in 
 making men worth the saving, and his religion was the prac- 
 tical, working, every-day kind that men can carry into their 
 business and pleasure, — introduce into their homes, their of- 
 fices and stores and shops, and into their work, their politics, 
 and everywhere else, — and which conduces to make them 
 better and nobler and happier. 
 
 For forty years he lived in Franklin, and so closely was 
 he identified and allied with its manufacturing, its banking, 
 its various interests, educational, social, moral, political and 
 other, that when he died it seemed as though the keystone of 
 the arch was gone, and certainly a central pillar of the town 
 itself had fallen. Forty years I And no man lives to say 
 that Daniel Barnard wronged him, and no man lives to 
 say that he ever wittingly did injustice to anybody, or looked 
 with contempt upon the humblest of God's creatures. (), 
 young men, what a record was that ! AVhat a encomium on 
 earth I What a passport to heaven. 
 
—14— 
 
 He was born sixty-five years ago in the town of Orange. 
 His youth was spent in hard work on a not over-productive 
 farm where ojiportunities for education were very meagre. 
 From the outset to the end he was eminently what is styled a 
 self-made man. He worked his way, paid his way, earned 
 and deserved the victory that he won over adverse circum- 
 stances. He taught district school. Young and inexperienced 
 as he was, such was the trust and confidence in which he was 
 held in that little, sparcely settled town of Orange, that he was 
 sent four times to represent its people in our state legislature, 
 where his prepossessing personality, his bright insight to 
 men and things was recognized, and, unassuming though he 
 was, he then attained a high position in public trust, respect 
 and admiration that he never lost, and the luster of which 
 was never tarnished. He committed himself to that party 
 that stood for the freedom of the soil, and later for the free- 
 dom of the slave. In 1851 he moved to Franklin, and en- 
 tered the law office of Nesmith & Pike, and upon his ad- 
 mission to the bar became a partner with Mr. Pike, Judge 
 Nesmith retiring from the firm, leavino^ a larofe and lucrative 
 practice, which had been established througli remarkable in- 
 dustry and aptitude. Nine years later Mr. Barnard with- 
 drew from the partnership, and began the practice of the law 
 by himself, and for nearly thirty years continued in business, 
 overrun with clientage, toiling day and night some of the 
 time to meet the urgent demands of a most exacting profes- 
 sion. After his son AVilliam's admission to the bar he be- 
 came a partner with his father, a business arrangment that 
 was very agreeable to both, and promised to relieve the elder 
 Barnard of much responsibility, but the sad death of the son 
 intervened, and left the father to struggle on alone. His 
 practice comprised not only the state cases, but a large civil 
 docket in Merrimack county and important causes in nearly 
 
—15— 
 
 every county in the state, ami especially in Belknap, Grafton 
 and Coos. In 18(i0 and 18()2 he represented Franklin in 
 the legislature, and was subsequently, in 1865 and LSUfi, 
 elected to the state senate, presiding over that body in the 
 latter year. In 1870 and 1871, lie was a nicmber of the 
 Governor's council. In 1872 he was a delcijate to the Ivc- 
 j)ublican National convention at Philadelphia. 
 
 He was solicitor of Merrimack county fi-oni 1<S67 until 
 he declined the position, in 1872. He again declined the 
 position in 1877. He was an earnest sup[)orter of the 
 homestead-exemption law, in 1850. He introduced the reso- 
 lution in the House which first gave the members a daily 
 news[)a[)er. As a member of the senate he took an interest 
 in the amendment of the Federal Constitution prohibiting 
 slavery, making an able and effective argument in its sup- 
 port. He was appointed Attorney-General of the state in 
 1887, which position he held with great honor at the time of 
 his death. Any position that Daniel Barnard might have 
 held would have been filled efficiently and well, and to pub- 
 lic satisfaction. His appointment to the Attorney-General- 
 ship did not come by im})ortunity and solicitation, but by 
 the acclaim of the whole bar, and the confirmation of j)opu- 
 lar sentiment. In 1867, Dartmouth college honored herself 
 in honoring him with the degree of Master of Arts. 
 
 His life is worthy of a volume. 1 cannot crowd a satis- 
 ftictory sketch of it into the half-hour allotted to me. He 
 was not a professional philanthropist, and yet we counted him 
 one of the guardians of the Granite state, such was his in- 
 terest in us all personally, and in our welfare as a common- 
 wealth, and such was his considerable })art in the history of 
 our progress during the last half-century. 
 
 Ho died on the thirty-sixth anniversary of tiie birth of his 
 eldest son, and at the same hour and minute of the day that 
 
—16— 
 
 his son (lied. As scholar, statesman, lawyer, attorney-gen- 
 eral he had to do with great concerns, important affairs, 
 stirring events, public tribunals, but it was as husband and 
 father that he appeared to the most attractive advantage. He 
 shone the brightest in what has been designated "the small 
 sweet courtesies of life." No man ever loved and was beloved 
 more devotedly. His early disadvantages led him the more 
 to ap})reciate education, and he made great sacrifices that 
 his children might have the advantages of good schooling. His 
 home was as sunshiny as his own disposition. Quoted and 
 honored as he was, it was in the family circle that his wit 
 and humor sparkled the most, it was at the hearthstone that 
 he was the best appreciated ; but now the cloud is over his 
 house. Yet, if death is sunrise, then it is morning with 
 him ; if to die is gain, he has won his greatest conquest. 
 
 He has gone. The great, bustling, pulsating world will 
 go on without him. Railway and other corporations will 
 organize, lease and contract with one another ; litigation will 
 arise ; legislatures will convene ; but we shall see him no 
 more. Xo more will he be anxious for others, no more will 
 he bear their burdens and fight their battles. Nothing dis- 
 tnrbs him now. Men will strive and struffde, reach and 
 fall as they did before, but all must share his fate. Our 
 paths, however widely they may seem to diverge, lead only 
 to the grave. We know not on whose cold, dead, pathetic 
 face we may next be called to look. We know not when 
 our own hour coineth, but the lesson of his life, the example 
 of his success, the pleasure of having had his acquaintance 
 and companionship, the sum of his usefulness, the sweetness 
 of his memory, are such that we thank God for having giv- 
 en us Daniel Barnard. 
 
 "More life, more life I Tis this we crave. 
 More life, more life ! When this we have — 
 'Tis this that we call death.'' 
 
LIBRftRY OF CONGRESS 
 
 014 014 140 9