E 407 THE W AR WITH MEXICO. .R59 " ^^^^ ^ SPEECH HON, JOHN L, ROBINSON, OF INDIANA, IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, JANUxlRY 18, 1848. In Committee of the Whole on the state of the Union, on the Resolutions referring the President's Message to the various Standing Committees. Mr. ROBINSON said, he would claim the indulgence of the committee for a few minutes only, while he called their attention to two or three points that had been made in this debate. He did not expect to follow the poetical gentleman from Georgia, who had just taken his seat, through the windings of his remarks for his hour. There were but one or two topics in the gentleman's speech on which he should touch. One of them was the recent charge made against the Executive for withholding from this House the instructions given to Mr. Slidell, our late Minister " to Mexico. A fresh charge against the Executive in reference to this war I And although he had given this subject some little attention, he must say, of all the extraor- dinary issues, of all the extraordinary objections that had been made in reference to this war, this, it seemed to him, was the most extraordinary, and had the least foundation. He had not examined the precedents in relation to this matter ; but the idea that this House had the right to call upon the President of the United States to lay before the world any and all the instructions given to his diplomatic agents pending negotiations, was an idea so preposterous that there was not a man in the land but must see at once that it had no foundation in reason — not one; not a man even who knew how to be a horse-jockey but must treat it as ridiculous. Why, if you have a right to demand that the President make public the instructions to Mr. Slidell, you have a right to call on him for his instructions to JMr. Trist ; and if you have that right, you have also the right, in the event of his appointing commissioners to meet commissioners of Mexico at some intermediate place, the very moment they have started, to call upon him for the instructions given them ; which instructions may be published here, and, sent on the wings of the wind, may reach Mexico; and our ultimatum may be in the hands of the Mexican commissioners before our com- missioners may reach there. Any man who knows how to sell a dozen of eggs or a horse, knows how utterly futile it would then render the ePibrts of our agents to obtain any fair or reasonable terms from Mexico. A plenipotentiary's instructions are always graduated. He is told, if he cannot get this, take that ; here is the least you must accept, but take more if you can get it. But if the minister on the other side is advertised beforehand as to what is the least you will take, does any suppose he will be stupid enough to offer you more? Moreover, in this case the instructions were given to Mr. Slidell before the war com- menced. He (Mr. R.) apprehended he was instructed to ask much less then than our Government ought to be willing to accept now, after Mexico has put us to the enormous sacrifice of blood and treasure, which has resulted from the war she wick- edly commenced. But the gentleman from Ohio [Mr. Schenck] asked, are you tame and craven enough to vote appropriations for carrying on a war until you know all the purposes that are to be accomplished by it? Why, in the name of common sense, what had the instructions to Mr. Slidell to do witli this war? They were never acted on by Mr. Slidell. So far from having anything to do with the commencememt of this war, they were not submitted to the Mexican Government at all ; for you know Mr. Slidell was rejected ; he was not entertained as our minister. His instructions were unknown to the Mexican Government, and whatever they may have been, could have Printed at the Congressional Globe Uftice. formed on their part no motive for the war. They would not even hear any propo- sition of peace. It was a mere pretext ; a pretext gotten up on the occasion, for the purpose of justifying some tender-footed gentlemen who come here from war districts to vote against supplies. He had not examined the historical precedents in reference to this matter of call- inor for the instructions or the correspondence in the hands of the Executive that may have passed between him and diplomatic confidential agents. By recollection alone, however, he could recur to a {q\s historical facts that vv'ould disclose the impropriety of publishing to the world these instructions and correspondence pending negotiations. In 1831 or 1833, pending a difficulty between this Government and France, the correspondence between Mr. Rives, who was so fortunate as to bring it to a conclusion, so far as bringing about a convention went — the correspondence between that distinguished gentleman and the French Government and his own Government was published ; published before the French Chambers made the neces- sary appropriation of twenty-five millions of francs, stipulated in that convention. What was the result? They all recollected that Mr. Rives intimated that he had overreached the French Minister in that negotiation ; that he had gotten more than he was authorized to take as his minimum ; and the consequence was, that it came well-nigh defeating the payment of the indemnity they had stipulated to pay. It well-nigh-brought about a war between this Government and that. It was true, also, that during the administration of the venerable gentleman from Massachusetts, there was a mission got up, and commissioners were started to the Congress of Panama, and, on being inquired of as to their instructions, he declined to communicate them, but referred the Plouse to the Senate, and said he would leave to that body to com- municate or not, as they saw fit. That gentleman not only claimed the right, on the part of the Executive, to withhold instructions, but he claimed the right to get up a mission without any authority of law, and then called on Congress to make appropri- ation for it. They recollected the excitement that grew up on that matter. But it seems to me those who got up this case upon the Executive were in search mainly of a very different affair than these instructions to Slidell. They expected to plow up a mare's nest in reference to the loudly-clamored but false accusation of a collusion between Santa Anna and Mr. Polk in reference to his return to Mexico. Mr. Polk, however, had withheld nothing on this point. He states that the order to Commodore Conner was given without collusion or correspondence with Santa Anna, or anyone else. So much in reference to that point. He passed to another — the pretext made by the gentleman from Georgia, the gentleman from Illinois, [Mr. Lincoln,'] and others who opposed the war, in reference to the march of the army from Corpus Christi to the east bank of the Rio Grande. That movement, it was alleged, was the cause of this war; and the whole opposition to this war, sifted down, centred in that; and that foundation taken from them, their M'hole superstructure fell to the ground. He should not go into an argument in reference to the boundary line between the United States and Mexico, as to whether the Rio Grande was the true one or not, or whether Mr. Polk ought to have taken the army there or not. He referred the gentleman from Georgia and the gentleman from Illinois to the able speech of the able Senator from Maryland, [Mr. Johnson,] delivered the other day in the other wing of this building, wherein he not only ably and clearly demonstrates that the Rio Grande is our proper boundary, but that Mr. Polk gave no just cause of offence in sending the army there. But there was one point in the controversy to which he should call their attention. The gentleman from Illinois [Mr. Lincoln] intimated, in a set of resolutions submitted by him to this House, that General Taylor, who was then in command of the army, had intimated more than once that the army ought not to have been marched to the Rio Grande, and inquired of Mr. Polk upon this subject. Now, he presumed that that gentleman, and every other gentleman who had read the political history of the country, the history of passing events, knew very well what were the facts. But, at the risk of repeating what gentlemen knew, that those out of this House who should read his remarks, and who might not have access to the documents, might know all about it, he intended, v/ith some degree of deliberation, step by step, to examine this matter. He did it for the purpose of showing that the Whig party, or at least that portion of it who wished to make General Taylor their candidate for the Presidency, when they held that this movement was the cause of the war, were doing it as a mere pretext, and were hypocritical in making the charge. What were the facts? The resolutions of annexation passed the Congress of the United States on the 1st of March, 1845, before Mr. Polk came into office. On the 6th of March thereafter, General Almonte, then the Mexican Minister to this country, demanded his passports and went home — alleging as the reason for this, that his Government would regard the act as cause of war. His Government at home went accordingly to issuing their war pronunciamentos, and raised and organ- ized an army with the avowed purpose of reconquering Texas to the Sabine. In view of these events, the Government and people of Texas demanded of this Gov- ernment protection. Mr. Polk had come into power finding these resolutions of annexation the law of the land. He could do no less, according to his sworn con- stitutional duty, than afford them the protection they asked. In the month of June, 1845, he selected General Taylor, over the heads of all other officers, his seniors in rank, and made him his confidential officer to command the forces for the protection of Texas. On the 15th June, (to which the gentleman from Georgia referred,) it is true, he told General Taylor his ultimate destination would be the Rio Grande ; but on the 8th July the President very materially modified his instructions. Through the Secretary of War, he wrote as follows : " War Department, July 8, 1845. " Sir : This department is informed that Mexico has some military establishments on the east side' of the Rio Grande, which are, and for some time have been, in the actual occupancy of her troops. In carrying out the instructions heretofore received, you will be careful to avoid any acts of aggres- sion, unless an actual state of war should exist. The Mexican forces at the posts in their possession, and which have been so, will not be disturbed as long as the relations of peace between the United States and Mexico continue. WM. L. MARCY. " Brigadier General Z. Taylor." This was dated July 8. Mr. R. said it was a very material modification of the first letter of instructions given by Mr. Bancroft, the acting Secretary of War. This letter was received and acknowledged by General Taylor before he left New Orleans. On the 30th July, before General Taylor had yet taken his position in Texas, the Secretary of War wrote him a third and still more definite letter as to the objects of his mission. He wished to call the attention of the House to this letter particularly, for he held that upon it the whole argument turned; and he wished to' show that the President, in giving his instructions to General Taylor, was discreet, cautious, as much so as a man need be. The Secretary of War wrote thus to General Taylor: " He [the President] has not the requisite information in regard to the country to enable him to give any positive directions as to the position you ought to take, or the movements which it may be expedient to make. These must be governed by circumstances. While avoiding, as you have been instructed to do, all aggressive measures towards Mexico, as long as the relations of peace exist between that Republic and the United States, you are expected to occupy, protect, and defend the territory of Texas, to the extent that it has been occupied by the people of Texas. The Rio Grande is claimed to be the boundary between the two countries; and up to this boundary you are to extend your protection, only excepting any posts on the eastern side thereof which are in the actual occupancy of Mexican forces, or Mexican settlements over which the Republic of Texas did not exercise jurisdiction at the period of annexation, or shortly before that event. It is expected that, in selecting the establishment for your troops, you will approach as near the boundary line — the Rio Grande — as prudence will dictate. With this view, the President desires that your position for a part of your forces, at least, aliould be west of the river Nueces." This was the 30th July, 1845. Several other letters of like tenor and effect were written to General Taylor during that summer and fall. He would read short extracts from one or two of them only. On the 23d of August, of the same year, the President again said to General Taylor, through Secretary Marcy : "The information hitherto received as to the intentions of Mexico, and the measures she may adopt, does not enalile the Administration here to give you more explicit instructions in regard to your movements than those which have already been forwarded to you." What "instructions" were these? Why, they were "to occupy, protect, and defend the limits of Texas to the extent that it has been occupied by the people of Texas, or to the extent that the Republic of Texas had exercised her jurisdiction." Well, with these two letters of instructions of the 8th of July and the 30th of July before him, the one telling him that there were Mexican posts on this side of the Rio Grande, and the other that he was only to occupy and defend the territory of Texas, as occupied by the people of Texas, or over which Texas had exercised jurisdiction, what did General Taylor do in the premises? In answering the letter of the 30th of July, he acknowledged its receipt on the 15th of August at Corpus Christi, and said . " Our last mail (wliich was saved with difficulty from the wreck of a schooner on the 13th instant) brought your communications of July 28 and 30 — the latter enclosing a letter of the Secretary of War of the same date. I am gratified to find that my measures thus far have met the approbation of the Government and General-in-chief, and, particularly, to find that I have but anticipated the wishes of the President in taking up a position west of the Nueces." • He had already got beyond the river Styx, or beyond the Rubicon, as the gentleman over the way said. Now, on the 4th of October, with his instructions before him, that he was only to occupy and defend Texas so far as Texas had been occupied by its people, or so far as the Government of Texas had exercised jurisdiction, he says, writing from Corpus Christi : " For these reasons, our position thus far has, I think, been the best possible; but, now that the entire force would soon be concentrated, it may well be a question whether the views of the Govern- ment would be carried out by our remaining at this point." General Taylor was down there on the Rio Grande, two thousand miles from this Capitol ; he had facilities for knowing how far Texas had occupied the country or exercised jurisdiction that Mr. Polk had not. Hence, Mr. Polk had given him a carte blanche — had allowed him to use his own discretion in the premises. With this power and those instructions before him, he said : " It is with great deference" — he seemed to be aware, said Mr. R.,here, thnthe was treading on ground that properly belonged to the Cabinet and not to the field — " that I make any suggestion on topics which 'may become matter of delicate negotiation; but if our Government, in settling the ' question of boundary, makes the line of the Rio Grande an ultimatum, I cabinet 'doubt" — he could not doubt what.' That to move an army would brino- on v^'arr That it would be an invasion of Mexico .? — "I cannot doubt that the settlement ' would be greatly facilitated and hastened by our taking possession at once of one ' or two suitable points on or quite near that river." There, then, General Taylor gave it as his deliberate opinion, that it would not he an invasion of Mexico; that it would not probably bring on a war between the two countries, but that it would "facilitate and hasten" peace by moving the army to the Rio Grande. Now you talk of making this same General Taylor your candidate for the Presidency. Suppose he had been your President, could you expect him to have acted otherwise as President than he advised the President to act when general of your army.' And further, in the same letter : "Our strength and state of preparation should be displayed in a manner not to be mistaken. However salutary may be the effect produced upon the border people by our presence here, we are too far from the frontier"— not beyond it, then, (said Mr. R.)— " to impress the Government of Mexico with our readiness to vindicate, by force of arms, if necessary, our title to the country as far as the Rio Grande. The ' cirmy of occupation' will, in a few days, be concentrated at this point, in condition for vigorous and efficient service. Mexico having as yet made no positive declaration of war, or com- mitted any overt act of hostilities, 1 do not feel at liberty, under my instructions, particularly those of July 8, to make a forward movement to the Rio Grande, without authority from the War Deoart- ment." ^ Again, under the same date, he says : " In case a forward movement should be ordered or authorized, I would recoinmend the adoption of Point Isabel and Laredo as the best adapted to the purposes of observing the course of the river and covermg the frontier settlements of Texas." He recommended (said Mr. R.) these two points — one at the mouth, the other a good way up the stream — as best adapted to do the very thing he was sent there to do, to wit: to cover and protect the frontier of Texas. So^'much for that letter, merely adding, by way of a parenthesis, that it has been frequently brought as a com- plaint against the President, that he sent him there with too small a^force. But, bearing on this point. General Taylor added, in a postscript: "Should any auxiliary 5 force be required, I propose to draw it wholly from Texas. I do not conceive that it will become necessary, under any circumstances, to call for volunteers from the United States." Yet he had ample authority to do so, (said Mr. R.,) as may be seen in the very letter of instructions of the 13th of January, 1846, which finally took him there. Just here he would pause a moment. This letter was written on the 4th of Octo- ber. Why was it that. the President of the United States did not, in accordance with the sug