'KJb Glass. UA Book » V\l3I i. / d-^i^ cX z-->- £^Z /, J ^'^ I S6. v*. -ft- Garret A. Hobart, Vice-President of the United States. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Friday, January 26, 1900. V^ASHINGTON. I9OO. I'll . EULOGIES OF MESSRS. GARDNER OF NEW JERSEY, STEV/ART OF NEW JERSEY, PAYNE, DALZELL, BROSIUS, RICHARDSON, GROSVENOR, PARKER OF NEW JERSEY, DOLLIVER, DALY OF NEW JERSEY, FOWLER, SAL- MON, AND GLYNN, In the House of Eepresentatives, Friday, January 26, li>00. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from New Jersey [Mr. Gardner] offers the resolutions which the Clerk will report. The Clerk read as follows: Resolved, That the House has received with profound sorrow the intelli- gence of the death of Garret A. Hobart, late Vice-President of the United States. Resolved, That the business of the House be suspended in order that the public services and private virtues of the deceased may be appropriately commemorated. Resolved, That the Clerk of the House be directed to communicate these resolutions to the Senate. Mr. GARDNER of New Jersey. Mr. Speaker, the frequency with which this body is called upon to pay the last sad tribute to the memory of the eminent dead is a most forceful reminder of man's mortality. Verily, "He cometh forth like a flower and is ciit down." The generations appear like the leaves of spring and flourish for a season only, then, smitten by the breath of the De- stroyer, fall, even as the leaves that wither and scatter in autumn's searing blasts. But the earth itself, the abode of man, shall per- ish; the visible heavens shall pass away; for there is nothing per- manent but the law and the love and the kingdom of God. We pause in our labors to-day to do homage to the memory of one who was not a member of this House, but who, in his high office, represented the suffrage and the majesty of the great Re- public. Garret A. Hobart had, from his early manhood, been singled out by common consent in his own State as the personality most abounding in promise of great service and future honor to his State; but he was greater perhaps than we knew, for when he rose to a commanding position among the nation's lights, it was seen that he was in his sphere; and when he died, all knew that a lumi- nary of great power had fallen from the national sky. The career of Mr. Hobart is another of those oft-recurring les- sons of the opportunities offered to young American manhood, and demonstrated that energy, integrity, and courage, if seconded 2 4193 P Con- by real ability, may conquer all the weary paths that lie between the lowly and the highest estate and lead triumphantly to the most exalted station; for he rose with no aid but his merit, with no friend but his deserts, and with no claim to recognition but his fitness. Garret Augustus Hobart was born on a farm near Long Branch, N. J. , in 1844, of New England and New Jersey ancestry which ran back to the English and the Dutch. Quickness of perception and comprehension, energy, physical and mental stamina, fidelity to duty, high courage, and an entire veracity of mind were his by inheritance and were ineradicable. It is difficult to believe he ever had a vice to overcome. Young Hobart was educated in the common schools and by his father, until he entered Rutgers College, from which he was graduated in 1863, before he was 19 years of age. After a brief period as an educator he began the study of law in Paterson, N. J., under the tutelage of his father's friend, also of New England stock, Socrates Tuttle, a gentleman of great ability, fine attainments, and splendid character. He was graduated from Mr. Tuttle's office, and admitted to the bar of New Jersey; then began his real career. Mr. Hobart later was united in marriage with Miss Jennie Tut- tle, daughter of his legal preceptor. Of that union I shall speak but briefly now, for to dwell upon it would seem like the min- gling of notes of discord with the funeral dirge, and an unpardon- able rudeness to her who did so much to hedge round his life with happy environment and to crown his days with joy. Let it suf- fice to say that the story of their wedded life and home in Pater- son, when told, will be "A sweet savor wherever happy homes are recognized as the citadel of virtue and the hope of the world." Mr. Hobart grew at once in professional and in public esteem. Had his abilities been entirely and continuously devoted to his profession, he would have attained the very first rank among its masters, for his great talents were legal and judicial to the last degree. In all his business life he never had use for any lawyer but a "close lawyer." But the public and the great business in- terests would not allow Mr. Hobart to practice his profession as he would then have desired. He was ever pursued with offers of office and of business. He was sought with proffers of oppor- tunity which other gifted men strove for in vain. Before he was 27 years of age he had been the legal counsel of his city and his county and was being asked to go to the legislature to mold the laws. He was elected to the assembly and afterwards to the senate of New Jersey. Whatever political body Mr. Hobart entered, he was placed at its head. The New Jersey assembly made • him its presiding officer: the New Jersey senate made him its presi- dent; the State Republican executive committee made him its chairman, in which capacity he conducted many of our most im- portant campaigns. He also represented New Jersey in the national Republican committee for many years, and nobody ever thought of a successor. Whatever Mr. Hobart did was so well done that opportunity, as I have said, was ever seeking him. I have never heard a criti- cism of his management of a business matter. Governments and courts felt secure in the management of their charges when in his hands. His great capacity and integrity, winning universal con- fidence, must have, as they did, rewarded his business efforts and discretion with affluence. 4193 [n the career of Mr. Hobart there was nothing sensational or episodical. He never sought but rather shunned notoriety. His aims were definite: his purpose steady as the granite hills; his efforts as sustained as the motions of the planet. To every task he brought the energy of a splendid hope. With him all objects were specific and every duty great, and to his conviction of duty, his definite aims, his tireless energy, and steady purpose, quietly pursued, are largely due the success and honors that crowned his life. He was a man of most magnificent courage, never more com- posed and hopeful than in the hour of defeat. When he had given to the service of his party all his splendid abilities during one cam- paign after another, closing with apparent disaster, he could re- gret without being cast down, deplore and be not discouraged: and even in that campaign in his State when he sought to realize the political ambition of his life, and when success had seemed assured until the last days of the contest, when the tides changed and new forces overwhelmed him, and his hosts of loyal friends were downcast and discouraged, he appeared as a rock left by a melting shore, which still lifts its head in majesty above the waters and forms a headland about which the yielding currents must eddy and rebuild the broken line. So, too, in that sad day when he returned to his country leaving his beloved daughter, in a foreign soil, dead on the threshold of womanhood; though his heart was bleeding, he turned the same pleasant face to the world, and, while a little drawn perhaps, the old smile was there. And at the last, conscious of his own approach- ing dissolution, when the soul makes the awful query that most affects all that live and die, he smiled with the fortitude and hope and confidence of a hero and a Christian martyr. Mr. Hobart was endowed with more admirable and enviable qualities than any one man I ever knew. All men agree that his was a most lovable personality. Informed men spoke of his ac- quirements; churchmen, of his rectitude and deep religious con- victions; the philanthropist, of his unostentatious charity: busi- ness men marveled at his business judgment; politicians wondered at his clear perception of the character and the value of issues; statesmen, at his wide and ready knowledge of national and interna- tional affairs; and all alike, at his ready powers of solution, readily mastering problems, however weighty and however intri- cate. His sympathy was as broad as the field of human struggle, and all classes felt its touch, so that when the dreaded message of his departure flashed over the country, the bitter tear fell at every hearthstone, for all alike felt the loss of a friend. When Mr. Hobart was nominated for the Vice-Presidency, factions in New Jersey at once lost their identity and party lines became confused. Regard for policies largely gave way to con- fidence in the man. What part of the 89,000 majority the State gave in that election was due to the personality of Mr. Hobart and the esteem in which he was held as a man can never be ac- curately stated, but it may be safely stated the result was a mag- nificent tribute from the citizenship of New Jersey to her gifted son— an expression of confidence in his patriotism, abilities, and exalted character. His example has been a beneficent influence in the community in which he lived and died, in the State which he served and hon- ored, in the nation which came to know and honor him, and to the civilized world which has now heard of him and his life, 4io:s which, in its business energy and integrity, private Christian pu- rity, and fidelity to every trust imposed, is a model for all men in all countries. He adorned society, lent a dignity to common af- fairs, and elevated every office he filled. He died as the good man dies, and he will be remembered here; therefore he has triumphed over death "in time and eternity." Mr. STEWART of New Jersey. Mr. Speaker, I will occupy the attention of the House but a very few minutes. Vice-President Hobart is dead. The nation was profoundly startled at the sad announcement. When we last saw him he was apparently in robust and vigorous health; but the black-robed messenger of death beckoned from the hilltops, and he followed with the dying to an eternal rest. I knew him well. I attended his marriage to one of the most delightful young women in our community. Now she is his sorrow-laden widow, cloistered in gloom and loneliness. His administration was unique, and the unusual friendship ex- isting between the dead Vice-President and our distinguished President was of the tenderest kind, and gave him personally and officially a dignity and importance herebefore lacking, and raised the office of Vice-President from one of perfunctory faculty to an exalted power. In early life he gave emphatic promise of future wealth and greatness. Our deeds do follow us from afar; And what we have been makes us What we are. He possessed greater business capacity and executive ability than any man I ever knew. He loved wealth and power, and dis- pensed both liberally. As the great poet says: The time of life is short; To spend it basely were too long. His neighbors and friends best know how his shortened time of life was spent. Midas-like, everything he touched turned to gold, and his genial, robust, and cheerful appearance loaded him down with preferment and power. But it is not to the dead our words should be alone or particularly addressed, but to the widowed wife and son who must carry this burden of sorrow throughout a lifetime. To this grand widow and stricken boy let our hearts go out with tenderness, sympathy, and love, and appeal to the Almighty, who is especially the widows' God, to strengthen her in her loneliness for all struggles to come: and when she ap- proaches the eternal throne may she bid a fond adieu to this world to embrace her beloved husband in the life everlasting. In this life there is a continual parting — by death, marriage, absence; all are profoundly sad; but death is saddest, for it is for life. How pathetic does our own great poet sing of this sad truth: All are scattered now and fled, Some are married, some are dead: And when I ask, with throbs of pain — "Ah! when shall they all meet again, As in the days long since gone by?" The ancient timepiece made reply: " Forever — never; Never— forever." Never here, forever there, Where all parting, pain, and care. And death, and time shall disappear. Forever there, but never here, The horologe of eternity Sayeth this incessantly. " Forever— never; Never— forever. " 4103 6 Soon as age greets us we have more friends in eternity than here; and when we are required to depart, death's journey is made easier by this thought. God grant we may all view life as a very transient state and always regard the star of eternity as soon to surround us in its effulgent rays. , Mr. PAYNE. Mr. Speaker, my acquaintance with Garret A. Hobart began on the day he was nominated to the office of Vice- President at St. Louis. His quiet, cordial, winsome greeting when I first met him lingered in my memory long after an acquaintance had ripened into a lasting friendship. I desire to add my testi- mony to those noble qualities of head and heart that characterized our late Vice-President. In our system of government the Vice-President occupies an anomalous and ofttimes uncomfortable position. His is an office of high rank, carrying with it the greatest possibilities of political heirship and yet bringing little power or responsibility. He is the presiding officer of the Senate, and is chosen for that august body and not by them. He has the right to vote only in case of a tie; he rarely has an opportunity to exercise this right while he presides over the deliberations of the Senate. In exercising the preroga- tives of a presiding officer he can never be a potent factor, but is alway the servant of the Senate. It is to be regretted that in our political system more important duties and greater responsibility could not have been imposed upon an office of such high rank. The duties of the office should have been in keeping with its great possibilities. In case of a vacancy, he is the constitutional successor of the highest officer in our system. Only a single life stands between him and the Presidency. While he is clothed with the high rank and dignity of presiding over one coordinate branch of Congress, he is shorn of responsibility and power. He has no place in the Cabinet counsels of the Executive. He can not raise his voice in debate in the Senate; he can not vote on the questions, great or small, that come before that body unless the Senators happen to be equally divided. He has no influence there or elsewhere, except that which comes from his own personality; scarcely more than he would exercise as a private citizen. Often his position is scarcely more enviable than that of the heir apparent to a Euro- pean throne. In the early days of the Republic great care was taken in the selection of candidates for this office. The fact that this officer was the constiiutional successor to the Presidency whenever a vacancy happened seemed to be the all-pervading influence in the naming of the Vice-President. Down to 1804 the Constitution distinctly recognized this principle. The electors voted for two persons. The one receiving the greatest number was chosen Presi- dent, and he who received the second greatest was chosen Vice- President. Under this provision John Adams and Thomas Jef- ferson were each chosen Vice-President and each succeeded, by election to the Presidential office, the President with whom they had previously been chosen as Vice-President. In like manner at a later period Martin Van Buren also succeeded the President under whom he had served as Vice-President. This method of selection was changed by the amendment of 1804, owing to an un- fortunate complication which arose under the old system. But the reason still existed why a candidate for the Vice- Presidency should be in all respects equal to the emergency should he suc- ceed to the Presidency. 4193 Since the change in the constitutional method of selection less care has been taken, as a general rule, in the selection of the Vice- President. Frequently the question of fitness has been sacrificed to that of availability. After hot and bitter strife within the party the Vice-Presidency has sometimes been thrown as a mat- ter of consolation to appease a disappointed and defeated faction. The President always represents the predominant thought and principles of his party; his possible successor should be chosen for the same reason. He ought not to be the exponent of the tenden- cies of the minority. His selection ought not to be the result of a desire simply to gain more votes for the ticket. Garret A. Hobart did much to restore the office to its old- time dignity and rank. No one who knew him well doubted his fitness and ability to fill with honor to lrmself and to the lasting glory of his country the place of its Chief Executive. He had the ability, the tact, the statesmanship to take a high place in the long line of illustrious men who have served their country in the great- est office in all the world. Mr. Hobart, not officially, but by the force of his character, was a part of the Administration. His counsels were listened to in the executive chamber, and his voice was heeded in legislative halls. May his successor be of the same nigh character and intellectual endownment, amply qualified for all the emergencies which the Constitution has imposed upon the office. Garret A. Hobart exemplified the typical life of a successful American boy. He worked his way through college and won the right to practice in the courts of his State by dint of hard work and on the meager pay as a teacher in the public schools. The school teacher became a lawyer at the age of 25, and this was the beginning of his success, culminating in the Vice-Presidency at the age of 53. While engaged in an active and exacting profes- sion, he found time to enter into the councils of his party and perform all the duties of an American citizen. Courage, com- mon sense, ability, and persevering work brought success in every sphere of his usefulness. Responsibilities multiplied upon him. but. like every busy man, he found time for all. No interest intrusted to his care was ever neglected. His fellow- citizens honored him and he honored them in the faithful and con- spicuous discharge of private and official duties. He was succes- sively presiding officer of each branch of the legislature of his own State. His advice was eagerly sought by clients and party managers. And with all the burden of responsibility he found time tor his social duties, his family, and his church. He passed away in the ripe maturity of his powers, seemingly in the day of his greatest possibilities and power, yet it was the close of a life abounding in influence and full of honorable achievements. As presiding officer of the Senate, he has had few equals and no superior. He seldom left the chair during the session of the Sen- ate, was always fully informed as to the progress of business, never shirked the responsibility of a decision, was ever courteous, tactful, and ready, and with all just and honest. He was re- spected by political friend and foe alike. In these few words, Mr. Speaker, I have sought, as it were, to place a single flower on the grave of Garret A. Hobart. His life work, how worthily and well done, the whole nation bears witness. His days were full of usefulness and crowned with honor. His last victory was his best; it was the victory of the Christian's faith. As he calmly bade his family farewell, and with courage turned to meet the great destroyer, it was with the 4193 calm confidence in a new life, unnumbered by the years. His death was the crowning triumph of his successful life. Verily, " His works do follow him. " Mr. DALZELL. Mr. Speaker, since I have been a member of this House I have very seldom taken any part in such exercises as engage our attention to-day. I have never felt that it was my duty to speak when speech would necessarily be only perfunctory. I have felt that the language of eulogy is too often the language of extravagance, and that this is the more apt to be so when it is the result of a seeming regard for the demands of propriety than when it is an answer to the promptings of an appreciative regard. Propriety suggests that we should put upon record our estimate of the nation's loss sustained in the death of the Vice-President: but if that were all that appealed to me to-day, I should remain silent and leave to others the duty of formulating that estimate. I come to bring my humble tribute to the memory of Garret A. Hobart because of my personal esteem for him, because of my admiration of his career, and because I believe him to have been a high type of American manhood, illustrating in his life the splen- did possibilities of American citizenship. As may be said of many Americans — perhaps of the most who are successful— he was the architect of his own fortune. And yet we are not prepared to say of all who thus achieve success that their lives command our admiration. It is the means by which the success is attained that challenges a place in our regard. Mr. Hobart had sterling qualities of character — industry, the love of work that brings experience; the wisdom that turns that experience to account in the seizure and improvement of opportu- nities; the desire to excel that, faithfully pursued, insures excel- lence; the integrity and strength of character, the fixedness of purpose, and the healthy ambition that sooner or later bring dis- tinction to their possessor and make him a marked man among his fellows. He was a successful man in every sphere that he entered, and the story of his life has to do with many and varied spheres. He realized success not because of mere accident of fortune or of opportunity, but by reason, above all, of the possession of those fac- ulties and traits of character that appeal to the confidence of men. He attained eminence as a business man. He accumulated wealth and shared it with others. His was the guiding mind in large projects and enterprises whose success meant not only individual but the general weal. He was a public-spirited man. As his means grew so he grew in mind and character. He shared his good fortune with others. His hand was open as his heart was warm. He had the conception of a broad-minded man as to his duties and responsibilities. He was one of those who conscientiously assume the burdens and face the duties of citizenship. He knew that good government is an individual affair, that there can be no honest mass unless there be honest particles. And so he gave of his time and of his means to the choice of good men to office. It was regardless of selfish purposes that he took place himself at the call of his fellows; for with him private interest yielded to public, and public office was a public trust. As the years went by the sphere of his usefulness and of his in- fluence grew. He became a leading man in his city, in his neigh- borhood, in his State, and at last in the nation. He was the law adviser of his city. He was more than once a 4193 member of his State legislature, and its speaker. He was for six years a member of his State senate, and its president. He was the nominee of his party for a seat in the United States Senate. He was Vice-President of the United States. In all these various positions of trust he so bore himself that few could criticise, no one blame, and all must praise. He was a recognized power in his church. He was benevolent and beneficent, exercising an influence for good among high and low, rich and poor, to the'remotest places to which that influence reached. And how many those places were only those can tell to whom his departure came with a sense of personal loss. It is not for us to penetrate the sacred precincts and attempt to measure the void made there where he was loved and loving hus- band and father, counselor, and bosom friend. Mr. Hobart's was a well-rounded character. He was a well- poised man; evenly developed on all sides, remarkably free from faults, and well equipped with the everyday virtues tuat count for so much in making life happy for those around us. But it is the crowning glory of Mr. Hobart's life and that which makes secure his place in history that, during his incumbency of the Vice- Presidency of the United States he restored to that office its old-time dignity and honor. He gave to this generation a con- ception of that office which for many previous generations had faded from the minds of men. The framers of the Constitution intended that the qualifications for President and for Vice-President should be identical. Inas- much as upon the death of the President the Vice-President suc- ceeds him, no reason appeared to their minds why the candidates for these offices should not in all respects be equals, and so the Constitution provided that the electors should vote for two per- sons, and that the one having the highest number of votes should be President and the next in number the Vice-President. So John Adams was chosen as the first Vice-President, and subsequently Thomas Jefferson as the second Vice-President, and both were chosen as Presidents upon the expiration of their respective terms. Since their day only one single man has been chosen President of the United States who had previously served as Vice-President, and that was Martin Van Bureu. And yet we have learned in four cases — those of Tyler, Fillmore, Johnson, and Arthur, who each succeeded to the Presidency on the death of the President — how essential it is that the Vice-President should be as well equipped for the first office as is the man chosen for the first office himself. The alarm occasioned by the rivalry between Jefferson and Aaron Burr in the election of 1800, when Burr almost succeeded to the Presidency, moved our fathers to amend the Constitution and to provide for the selection of a President as such and a Vice- President as such. At the time of this change in our system there were not wanting those who, measured by subsequent events, have been proven to be true prophets. In the debate in the House in 1803 upon the proposed amendment to the Constitu- tion Mr. Roger Griswold said: The President is elected for four years. He may die within that period, he may be removed from office, or he may become disqualified to perform its duties. In either of these events the Vice-President succeeds to the power. Under the existing arrangement you will secure, as far as human prudence can accomplish it, the most eminent men for these two offices. Each candi- date must be voted for as President, and if the electors fairly execute the Constitution they will give their votes for those men whoarethe best qualified to administer the Government. Thus under everv probable event you will find one of the most eminent of your citizens at the head of your Govern- ment. 4193 10 But if the amendment prevails, the case must be greatly changed. The man voted for as Vice-President will be selected without any decisive view to his qualifications to administer the Government. The office will generally be carried into the market to be exchanged for the votes of some large States for President. And the only criterion which will be regarded as a qualifica- tion for the office of Vice-President will be the temporary influence of the candidates over the electors of his State. It is in this manner you must ex- pect to obtain a man to fill the second office in the Government and who must succeed to the power of President upon every vacancy. The momentary views of party may perhaps be promoted by such arrangements, but the permanent interests of the country are sacrificed. In how many national conventions have we seen the realiza- tions of these forebodings! In how many conventions have we seen men chosen as Vice-Presidential candidates without any con- trolling regard to their fitness for the office of President, but simply because of expediency and availability for ulterior pur- poses! The consequence has been a lowering of the dignity of the second office in the Government in the minds and estimate of the people, and a consequent diminution of the power and dignity pertaining to the office itself. And while our Vice-Presidents, as a rule, have been distinguished men, they have acquiesced in the popular estimate, and have sought no wider sphere or broader duties than pertain to the Presidency of the Senate. To this rule Mr. Hobart was a conspicuous exception. He brought to the administration of his office a lofty conception of the place, and a feeling of personal interest in and sympathy with legislation. His strong personality pervaded the Senate Cham- ber. His clear convictions, his earnestness, his patriotism, made themselves felt upon his associates. He was not a looker-on, but an actor, an efficient instrument in the administration of govern- mental affairs. Unlike his predecessors, he did not stand apart from responsibility. He had the confidence of the President; he ^^ participated in the councils of the Cabinet; he helped to shape and mold policies and direct events. He kept abreast of the times and had Providence so decreed he could at any moment have taken up the task had the President been compelled to lay it down. It was his fortune to live in stirring times, to participate in grave events. He belonged to an Administration that will mark a new epoch in American history and shape for good or ill our future destiny. Of that Administration he was a part. Toward the shaping of that destiny he contributed his share of counsel and control. He magnified his office. He taught the people to esti- mate it as he estimated it. He taught us all a lesson that I doubt not will bring results in our future history. He restored the Vice- Presidency to the place in our system that it held in the system of the fathers. And so when death claimed him all the people mourned his loss. They said of him as we say of him: He was a good man, a good citizen, a loyal friend, our great Vice-President. Mr. BROSIUS. Mr. Speaker- Sir Launcelot, there thou lye«t; thou were never matched by none earthly knight's hands; thou were the truest friend to thy lover that ever bestrode a horse: thou were the kindest man that ever struck with a sword.— LaMorte - working day in the year. He did all things well because he did all things intensely. He had learned that in things where the heart is not, the hand is never powerful. From his life we learn that greatness flows not from chance, nor from a mere happy com- bination of events, but simply from the magic of unwavering de- termination, clear apprehension, and ceaseless toil. Garret A. Hobart became a great man because he possessed these qualifica- tions and because they enabled him to fill great occasions. He had the abilities, the confidence, and the stamina to meet momentous occasions, and therefore such occasions marked him and called him to be what the successes of his abilities, confidence, and stamina would make him. Jackson, Lincoln. Clay, Blaine, and Tilden all drew their greatness from this same fountain head: aye, more, all the great master spirits, all the founders and lawgivers of empires, all the defenders of the rights of men, all the upbuild- ers of the greatness of a nation, are made by these same laws. It is fitting that we should pause in the rushings of our work-a- day world to pay tribute to a man who. by the sheer force of ability, carved his way from ' ' a man with the hoe " to be the occupant of the seat of the Vice -Presidency of the United States. Only from the facts of a life like this is composed substantial thought. All other thought is mere speculation, mathematical philosophy, a puncture by the rapier of probability into the clouds of guess-land. It is well that we should pause and reflect upon the incidents of such a life, because, when events daily increase in the growing magni- tude of a nation like ours, history becomes a dwarf and passes into biography and there is need in the rapidity of national ad- vancement for the microscope to be placed on every honored son of the Government, so that he may be seen in his true grandeur and taken at his true worth. To the student the life of Garret 4193 31 A. Horart must drive home the fact that glory is only a furrow in the dust, but at the same time it can not help teaching that it is worth while to stamp that dust under foot, so as thereon to leave an impression by which the world and posterity may know that we have once journeyed along the road of life. Some one has said that death transforms an opponent into a friend. In a political sense this can not b? said to apply to the man whose loss we mourn to-day. Even his hardest political op- ponents never allowed the smoke of the fiercest political battles to blind their vision as to the sterling worth of Hobart. They recognized that in politics, as in war. the greatest men are those who never capitulate. They realized that while men of different political faiths differ as to everything on earth, they may some day be united in what is larger than everything mundane, in what; embraces the sum total of life and thought the arms of Provi- dence. History teaches us that as great men see the right more right lv than small or mediocre minds, so they see the false more falsely. The knowledge of this fact brings to opponents in poli- tics a'brotherhood and a manliness that almost deify differences of opinion and sweeten the acrimonies of opposition. From a farmer's son Garret A. Bobart worked his way through college and made himself a legal light of his State and a power in the politics of the nation. His ascendancy was like the atoms of the soiling charcoal that we little value, becoming by wise combinations and gradual arrangements the resplendent dia- mond which every eye admires. Grandly, indeed, in all the work- ings of his life did this son of the masses attest the fact that from the pure, untainted blood of the common people come the rulers of the world. Grandly did he perform his business functions for his associates, his official functions for his country, and accomplish projects which scores of mediocre minds could never accomplish. The people of his native State loved him, his business associates loved him, his opponents respected him, and men are not wont to cherish so deeply that which is not deserving of their love and admiration. According to Edmund Burke — Reproach is concomitant with greatness; envy grows in a direct propor- tion with fame, and censure is the tax that every man must pay the public for being eminent. In the main these assertions are true, but in the history of Garret A. Hobart is found the exception which proves the rule of their truthfulness. Throughout all his undertakings Mr. Hobart exercised an indomitable will to acquire and retain suc- cess. He found no joys in the intrigues of the wanton courtier; his heart was not wedded to the revels of pleasure; his soul always took flight beyond the ticklings of sense. With him one great goal was always in view and the desire to reach it was father of all his efforts. Such ambition has served the world in good stead. It has worked like the desire of the philosopher's stone on the chemists of old. The object of their search was truly a chimera, nevertheless it was productive of a real good in the shape of modern chemistry. In like manner civilization owes inestimable advantages to such ambition as Hobart's, though the honor which is the object of its quest may prove a will-o'-the-wisp. It was the spur that goaded Hobart on from business triumph to busi- ness triumph, from office to office, only in the end to find him- self Vice-President and this country the richer for his ambi- tion. It is the motive power that has ever kept the wheel of progress in motion and prevented the world from loitering on the 4193 32 path to advancement. Far be it from my intention to canonize Mr. Ho bart. In his career he must have made some mistakes- else he would not have been a man— but that man is the greatest who makes the fewest, and Hobart's missteps are far outweighed by his many noble deeds and kind offices, 'in fact, to whatever shortcomings may have been his we can apply the words of the poet: Motes in the sunshine, foam bells on the ocean. Cloud shadows flitting o'er the mountain's breast— His faults but marked the mighty play, the motion Of a grand nature in its grand unrest. To say that Garret A. Hob art was an eloquent man would be to do injustice to the great men who have attained eminence by the arts of Demosthenes and the attributes of Cicero, and at the same time to make that assertion would be to cast a shadow of disrespect upon that grand instrument by which Mr. Hobart achieved distinction, that most potential of instruments within the grasp of man— personal influence. Those who carefully note the comparative value of lives in a community soon learn that the element which counts for most is that subtle thing called personal influence. In it there is something more potent than money or speech, a mystic force which flows out from it and magnetizes all that come within its range. It is to the successful man what fra- grance is to the flower, what light is to the lamp. It is part and parcel of his personality; yet it reaches outside and beyond him- self. That Garret A. Hobart was endowed with this magnetic power in a remarkable degree is evinced from the facts stated in this House to-day by the gentleman who knew him well and knew him long. The value of this personal influence was greatly aug- mented by a great human sympathy and a massive manly sense, communicating to his associates and allies new life and energy, touching and unsealing in their breasts the springs of resolution and self-help, and flooding them with soul cheer. In life there is nothing except what we put in it. In the fifty-three years of his life Garret A. Hobart crowded so much work, so many successes, so numerous duties as to merit irom the American peo- ple that most eloquent tribute paid to Goethe by the Emperor of Germany when he met him and exclaimed: •' You are a man.'* Michelet has gone into raptures over the force of that compliment paid to the great German poet, and the American people may well be pleased that there died in harness as the second highest official in the land a man who could well be called '*a man." From his generosity we know that he appreciated the fact that flowers fade without dew and light. From his amiable personality we are sure that he realized the imperishable truths that charity and love are the dew and light of the human heart. He was not of the pessi- mistic mind, which holds that while nations ascend in civilization, governments descend in administration. He was not of those who are constantly living in the dusk of the past, but rather one of those who by the light of the past purpose to see to it that the administration of governments keeps step with the civilization of nations. From the fate of Lot's wife being turned into a statue of salt for turning back, he had garnered the determination to press ever onward in accordance with the thought that he only lives who acts in tlie present and thinks of the future. Despite the millions and millions of people on earth, the world knows only two kinds of minds— minds that are metaphysical pure and simple and metaphysical only, and minds that are not. 4193 33 In Robespierre and St. Louis we have examples of the mere meta- physical mind. Those that are not metaphysical are more or less fatalistical. The minds that work out the most for the ameliora- tion of mankind are the minds that are not only metaphysical, but also reflective of their antithesis. In Charlemagne and St. Augustin we have the greatest examples of this sort of mind, while in Hobart it is duplicated in essence, though perhaps not in totality. It is such a mind that makes man the ardent believer in the dispensations of an all- wise Providence, as the gentleman from Pennsylvania and the gentleman from New York, the leader of the majority, represent Mr. Hobart to have been. In his religious inclinations and political enthusiasm he must have been somewhat akin to Cardinal de Berulle. Students of French history will remember that when La Rochelle, under Louis XIII, resisted Richelieu so handsomely. Richelieu became fright- ened and wanted to effect a treaty. Cardinal de Berulle per- suaded Richelieu to deviate from this course on account of a cer- tain something, be knew not what, which he called "trust in God." Richelieu, a strong-minded man, made fun of him and in- solently asked De Berulle when God was to keep his promise. De Berulle replied with magnificent simplicity. "lam without en- lightenment, but not without thoughts, and, since you command. I will tell them to you. I count on La Rochelle as I counted on the Island of Rhe. I expect success, not from the siege, nor from the assault, nor from the blockade, but from some prompt and unex- pected effort." And so with Hobart; if he thought his cause was right, he was ready to fight — to fight calmly, easily, diplomatically, so as to make little bluster and but few enemies, but confident that he must win, because he thought he had right with him and because he believed that right would somehow win, even if it had to be helped from above by " a prompt and unexpected effort." The political career of Garret A. Hobart affords an interesting comparison between the politics of today and the politics of years ago. Caesar Borgia was a giver of battles with poison. Bona- parte was a giver of battles with cannon. Hobart was a giver of battles with diplomacy, sagacity, and parliamentary etiquette, and so typifies the methods of the present as against the methods of the past, as found in Borgia and Napoleon in the olden days, when they were wont to destroy men so as not to destroy nations by allowing them to hurl themselves one against another. In those days personalities occupied the whole space of the political arena, masses none. In our day the masses are the unit of the political battle, personalities simply the kindling wood of a little enthusiasm. Battles took place then between prince and prince. A mere ordinary man was an obstacle, and was treated as such. That was called politics, and, bad as it was, for those who love humanity it was better than war. Politics then was a game be- tween elevated heads; now it is a contest between millionaire, lawyer, laborer, and men in general, in which Garret A. Hobart has proved that in the United States of America the son of a poor farmer can, by his own merit and his own ability, become a Caesar of the purest type and a Napoleon in both finance and politics of the greatest influence. The lives of Csesar Borgia and Napoleon show that murder and force were the instruments of success in the politics of olden days. The life of Hobart gives proof that the political triumphs of to-day are the victories of intellectual supremacy — not perhaps of one man, but of some party, some principle, as represented by supporters and champions. 4193-3 31 Garret A. Hobart is no more. In the councils of his party there is a vacant chair; in the halls of our National Legislature there reigns an air of mourning; in the business circles of the country there are being written resolutions of respect and memo- rials of condolence; but for all this sorrow there is consolation in the fact that while he lived he was a power among men; consola- tion in the knowledge that in honor of his memory the hand of History will write upon her everlasting tablets and beneath the name of Garret A. Hobart: His life was gentle, and the elements So raix'd in him. that Nature might stand up And say to all the world, "This was a man! " Mr. GARDNER of New Jersey. Mr. Speaker, several gentle- men who desired to contribute something on this occasion having been unavoidably compelled to be absent, I ask unanimous con- sent for general leave to print. The SPEAKER. The gentleman from New Jersey asks for general leave to print upon the life and character of the late Vice-President of the United States, Mr. Garret A. Hobart. Is there objection? There was no objection. The resolutions were unanimously agreed to. Mr. GARDNER of New Jersey. Mr. Speaker, as a further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased, I move that the House do now adjourn. The motion was agreed to. Accordingly (at 4 o'ciock and 14 minutes p. m.) the House ad- journed. 4193 o LB N 10