p612ITUllf6» pH83 "(^ut of their Own Mouths shall they be Condemned." E 670 .094 Copy 1 SOLDIERS MD SAILORS, ^^~^l ^[/^ ^^-^*^ ^t^^ - ' <3 VViH^V tl^ LOOK TO YOUR INTERESTS. GRANT AND COLFAX. Comrades, Veterans of the Late Union Army and Navy : You ■who for four loDg years endured the hardships of the battle-field, aud by your bullets saved the nation from destruction — it is for you to decide whether the war was fought in vain, and whether Rebels and Copper- heads shall rule, and yourselves be despised and insulted. In order that you may un- derstand the spirit now actuating the Dem- ocratic party, your attention is called to the following extracts from speeches of "Drmocratic" orators, and editorials of their papers. The rebel general, Wade Hampton, one of the delegates to the convention that nominated Seymour and Blair, at a ratifi- cation meeting recently held in South Caro- lina, said : "J yield to none in devotion to that lost cause for which we fought. Never shall I admit that the cause itself failed, and that the principles which gave it life were therefore wrong. Never shall I brand the men who upheld it so nobly as rebels or traitors.''^ Ex-GovERNOR Vance, of North Caro- lina, also a delegate to the convention, said in the course of his remarks at a ratifi- cation meeting in Richmond, Va., a few nights after the nomination, '■^ That what the confederacy fought for would he won by the election of Seymour and Blair. ' ' The rebel General Toombs, of Georgia, one of the retiring Senators at the outbreak of the rebellion, declared, in a speech, made at Atlanta, Georgia, ratifying the nomina- tions of /Se^mowr and Blair, '■'■That as the war was produced by the defeated Democratic party in 1860, so they would never have peace until it is restored to power in 1868. * * * I say by God, that neither des- potism, nor tyranny, nor injustice meets with peace in this world, or the next. We went no peace in chains; peace worthy of o^,4- freecloni wc want ; and as we have now no possibility of fighting icitli tlie sword, lei us figlit with the ballot box.'' ^ Again we have the letter of General Frank P. Blair, Jr., the "■Deynocraiic''' candidate for Vice President, in which he de- clares for revolution in the following lan- guage: "There is but one way to restore the Government and Constitution, and that is for the President elect to declare these acts null and void, compel the army to undo its usur- pations at the South, disperse the carpet-bag governments, and allow the white people to reorganize their own governments and elect Senators and Representatives. ' ' The Memphis {Tenn.) Avalanche, {rebel,) in alluding to Blair's letter says: "7i icas the publication of this letter that secured Mr. Blair his nomi- nation for the Vice Presidency. Thus it loill be seen that the North is far ahead of the South. They are rife for revolution.'''' The Charlestown {Va.) Chronicle says: "General Blair was an Abolitionist and a war man, but those are dead issues, and, if he was sincere in his recent letter, he loill answer our purpose.'''' This purpose, as declared by Humphrey Marshall, another rebel, in a speech at Louisville but a few days since, was to '•'■wipe ouV all that has been done in the way of reconstruction, and the fourteenth i amendment to the Constitution. According j to General Tom Ewing, Jr., it is no more | nor less than revolution, as will be seen by I the following extract from his speech de- I livered at the Washington ratification I meeting: "On the third of November next i the American people will endeavor to re- j store those States to their constitutional I I rights. Should this by a possibility ftiil, the white population of those States may succeed in placing themselves in possession of their governments: oihencise, as sure as the Anglo-Saxon blood runs in the veins of Southern men, there xcill be an upheaval of civil war, and then, should Congress sus- i tain the blacks, ashes will cover the ruins of the whole Eepublic." This man Ewing has gone over body and soul to the rebel Democracy, and now threatens an '■'■upheaval of civil war'''' if by any possibility Seymour and Blair should /ail to be elected; and, according toothers, it will be war if they are elected. See, for instance, the speech of the rebel General Lawton, delivered at Savannah, Ga., a few weeks since, in which he says of the Democratic platform, ^'there teas nothing that the South wanted that was not there.'''' » * * * * "For the first time we have a platform we can adhere to. We have leaders (Sey- mour and Blair) to represent those prin- ciples who will carry us out of the 'slough of despond.' Peace has its victories as well as war; those great principles for which we fought and which we feared were lost may yet be achieved.''^ Read what the Mobile (Alabama) Daily Register says: "If by any species of chicanery or fraud the legitimate voices of a- majority of the ichole people of the United States are con- temned and the Radical candidates are pro- nounced elected by the Radical Congress, the Democracy of the country will not submit to it, and will take arms to sustain the decrees of the ballot-box." - * * "Now, if civil war comes out of this con- flict of political forces, the white men of the South cannot be worsted; for war and its terrors in their deadliest form are not comparable to the evils they will have to endure under a perpetuation of scalawag and carpet-bag rule. And here 'loe may as well say that the people of the South do not intend to submit to that permanent rule, re- sult as the Presidential election may.'''' At the late Georgia "Democratic" Convention one of the delegates addressed the convention as follows: •^ * * ^'^ We are in the michl of a great 4 ^ revolution, wJiicJi may end peacefully at the '^ ballot-box; but if not, then the trtie men of the South will rally once more around their now folded banner, and tcill try the issue at '"'the cartridge-box.'''' [Loud and enthusiastic