Class R fcllM Book Gopyrightls 10 C0EHHGHT DEPOSm Imaginary Playmates an< Other Mental Phenomena of Children NATHAN A. HARVEY STATE NORMAL COLLEGE YPS1LANTI. MICHIGAN / Imaginary Playmates and Other Mental Phenomena of Children NATHAN A. HARVEY STATE NORMAL COLLEGE YPSILANT1, MICHIGAN Copyright 1918 NATHAN A. HARVEY ©CIA50721 ^vQ \ 10 X TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I. — Imaginary Playmates 7 Chapter II. — Projected Images 25 Chapter III. — Images in Reading 34 Chapter IV. — Hallucinations 40 Chapter V. — Number Forms 49 Chapter VI. — Mental Calendars and Alphabet Forms 60 Chapter VII. — Chromoesthesia 72 Chapter VIII. — Synesthesia 80 Chapter IX. — Original Languages of Children 85 Chapter X. — Double Personality 92 Chapter XL — Paramnesia 100 Chapter XII. — Dreams 107 Chapter XIII. — Turned Around; or, Illusions of Orien- tation 120 PREFACE The material for the discussion of the topics in the follow- ing pages has been drawn from individual reports and personal interviews with more than five hundred different persons whose experiences are recorded. I have the fullest confidence in the accuracy of the reports and the sincerity with which they were made. I knew each person intimately, and a per- sonal interview permits a kind of cross questioning and com- parison with the reports of others which it is impossible to employ in a written questionnaire. The reports upon which the following chapters are based are absolutely truthful, and as accurate as the circumstances will permit. This book has developed out of a series of lessons on Indi- vidual Differences. In general, our psychology as a part of the professional preparation for teaching, has failed to function to the degree that it should. The reason for this partial failure seems to be that we have been teaching only one phase of psy- chology. The laws of psychology which we have been teaching, are statements of the resemblances between the mental pro- cesses of all persons. But teachers must deal with individuals, and individuals manifest differences as well as resemblances. It is as much a necessity for professional preparation to study individual differences as it is to study general resemblances. Individual differences are of two kinds; quantitative and qualitative. The quantitative differences are studied by a process of mental measurement. They exist in processes that are common to all individuals, but manifested in different de- grees. An example of this kind of difference is seen in reac- tion time, which differs widely in different persons. But there are qualitative differences as well as quantita* tive. Some persons have mental experiences that are alto- gether wanting in others. The topics treated in this book represent this kind of individual differences. The topics selected for treatment are of different degrees of familiarity to psychologists. Some of them have already been very thoroughly treated, but others, such as Imaginary Playmates, Images in Reading, Paramnesia, Illusions of Orien- tation, and Original Languages, have been but slightly in- vestigated. All of these topics are of special interest to all persons, and constitute the most attractive feature of psychol- ogy to a very large number of students. They are to psychol- ogy classes, what electricity is to a boy beginning to study physics. The bibliographies are not intended to represent anything like a full list of publications upon the subject, but merely to indicate the kind and amount of reading that may be expected to be done in connection with each chapter. Ypsilanti, Michigan, September 12, 1918. CHAPTER I IMAGINARY PLAYMATES. The soul of a child embraces elements that are incompre- hensible to the grown up man. It contains chambers into which the light of mature intellect can with difficulty pene- trate. Its experiences seldom receive their proper appreciation, and the child and the parent are of necessity, comparative strangers. To know the child, we need to know what his child- ish experiences are, and we must inquire of the child what those experiences may be. The experiences of children differ widely from each other. The experience of one child is no criterion by which to judge of the experiences of another. Children differ as wide as the poles in the experiences which they encounter. Only by a col- lection of many divergent experiences of different children are we able to comprehend what the actions of any particular child may mean. Some children have playmates that are wholly imaginary, but which are as vivid and real to them as living playmates would be. These playmates are not merely vivid ideas, or imaginings, but actual visual and auditory projections. They can be seen and heard as vividly as if they are living children. Some typical cases will best show the characteristics of these imaginary playmates. Miss Ruby C. was an only child. She had two imaginary playmates whom she knew by the names of Katie Fendus and Nellie Brosus. These playmates were two little girls of about her own age, who were as vivid and distinct to her as two liv- ing children would be. She could see them very plainly, and could hear the tones of their voices when they were talking. She describes clearly how they were dressed, and how they wore their hair. Sometimes the three of them would play to- gether, and sometimes she would sit still and watch them play. The three of them sometimes played school, and she remem- bers that they used to tell her how to spell words. One time they told her to spell meat, meqfeg, which was not correct. Miss C. remembers seeing these two playmates as early as she can remember anything. Certainly they appeared to her by the time she was three years old. She does not remember 8 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES the circumstances of their first appearance, nor how they re- ceived their names. Neither does she know the occasion for their disappearance, which occurred when she was about eight. She often talked with her mother about the doings of Nellie and Katie. In fact, it was rather a common subject of conver- sation with her. Another case will emphasize the same features of this typical example. Miss Bessie C. reports that she had an imag- inary playmate whom she called Dorothy. Dorothy began to appear to her when she was about seven or eight years of age, and continued until she was about twelve. Dorothy was a little girl of just about her own age. She could see Dorothy as clear- ly as she could see a living child, and could hear the tones of her voice when she talked. Dorothy went to school with her, and in fact, the two girls were together nearly all the time. She and Dorothy played with their dolls, and would have tea parties together. She always insisted upon an extra place at the table for Dorothy, with plate and knife, and would become indignant at her mother, who could not understand who Dor- othy was, and the necessity for the extra equipment. At Christmas time, Bessie always hung up an extra stocking for Dorothy. She never quarreled with Dorothy, but she does not remember that Dorothy ever told her anything which she did not already know. These two cases manifest the characteristics of at least half of all the reports of imaginary playmates. 1. Vividness. Nearly always they are described as being as vivid as a living child would be. 2. Both visual and auditory. They can be both seen and heard. 3. They are children of about the same age as the child who experiences them. 4. They are really playmates, whose society is enjoyed by the one who experiences them. 5. They are known by some name similar to that of other children. 6. They begin to appear early in the life of the child. Usually, they are seen by the time the child begins to remem- ber anything, and the manner of their beginning is indefinite and not known. IMAGINARY PLAYMATES 9 7. They disappear gradually, without attracting atten- tion, either about the age of eight, or about the age of twelve. 8. The occasion for their disappearance is seldom recog- nized. 9. Their appearance is generally described, and often made the subject of conversation with parents, or with other children. 10. They are not hallucinatory. The child recognizes that they differ from real, living, objective children. While these are the points in which a very large number of imaginary playmates will agree, there is not a single one of them in which great variations do not occur. Let us examine each characteristic separately. 1. Vividness. It is difficult to convey to a person who has not had a similar experience, just what is meant by the vividness of an imaginary playmate. Many persons can re- member how an object looked, who have no capacity for visual- izing it, projecting it, or re-seeing it. The difference between an idea of a thing and a percept of a thing consists principally in the difference in intensity of the nervous impulse that ac- companies the two processes. For the moment, we may be sat- isfied with the statement that the imaginary playmates are as vivid as living children would be, and that there is no percep- tible difference in their appearance. 2. They are both visual and auditory. They are both seen and heard. While this is the general rule, it is not universal. Miss Christine M. describes a playmate, who was a little girl always dressed in white, stiffly starched, and with a short skirt, whom she could see very clearly. The appearance was visual only, and she never heard the playmate talk. Similarly, Mr. Rollin R. reports that for several years he had an imaginary playmate, who was a little Indian boy of about his own age, whom he followed frequently through the woods, and from whom he learned many things in wood craft, but whose voice he never heard, and with whom he never talked. Less common is the experience of an imaginary playmate that is exclusively auditory. Miss Lucille B., however, reports that she had a toy telephone, by means of which she regularly visited with an imaginary playmate, whose voice she could dis- tinguish clearly and knew it well, but whom she never saw. 10 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES Every day she would report to her playmate over the telephone that happenings of her day at school, and would receive similar reports from her playmate at the other end of the line. Even more emphatic is the case of Miss Lurah M, who with her two sisters, had two imaginary playmates whom they knew by the names of Banter and Dedy. Banter and Dedy were two boys who lived in the upper story of an old granary, the lower floor of which constituted the regular playhouse of the three girls. Miss M. never saw the boys, but she talked freely with them and they talked freely to her. She knew intimately the sounds of their voices, and they talked with her and with her sisters a great deal. The boys were great travelers, and would often tell the girls about the places they had visited. The girls often played keeping house, and would have tea parties and make mud pies. These mud pies they regularly handed up to the boys in the loft, asking their opinion of the excellence of the pies. 3. In more than half of the cases, the playmates are children of approximately the same age as those to whom they appear. The variations from this rule are interesting and very funny. In some cases, instead of being children, the playmates are grown up men and women. Miss Fay P. had three play- mates; one of them was a tall dark man whom she knew as Patty. She did not like Patty, and was rather afraid of him, and avoided him whenever she could. A second was a tall man with a high hat whom she knew as Dr. Cady, and whom she liked greatly. A third was a negro woman who always wore a red bandanna handkerchief around her head. She liked her very much. These three persons were very commonly with her for several years. A somewhat similar case is that of Miss Phyllis S., who had a playmate whom she called Sister Ogle. Sister Ogle was a young lady about "high school age," probably seventeen or eighteen years old. She sometimes came to see Phyllis, who was six or seven, and on such occasions Phyllis would get out a large sachel, which she always referred to as Sister Ogle's sachel. In this sachel were many presents that Sister Ogle always brought for Phyllis, as well as a wonderfully beautiful party dress which Phyllis greatly admired. The presents and the dress were wholly imaginary. IMAGINARY PLAYMATES 11 But the imaginary playmates are not always even persons. Miss Wilma G. reports the case of her little brother who has a flock of sheep which manifest all the characteristics of imag- inary playmates. There are several lambs in the flock, and he sometimes carries one lamb under his arm while driving the other sheep from one room to another. Miss Lottie G. reports that after having visited a county fair, at which she was much interested in an exhibit of collie dogs, two imaginary collie dogs, which she called Popsie and Wopsie, appeared to her and were her constant playmates tor two years. Miss Bessie S. reports her experience with an imaginary playmate who was not a little girl. When she was four or five years old, her family lived in a house that had considerable ground around it, and which was near a railroad. In one place there were several thornapple trees, under one of which was a pile of rocks. This particular spot was especially attractive to- ner as a place to play. But this particularly attractive place was inhabited by a ferocious little dwarf who would rush out at her whenever she went to that place to play, and chase her home, swinging his arms, clawing at her and shouting. He was not so large as she was, and he always wore a funny cap. She discovered, however, that she could placate the dwarf, or pre- vent his appearance, by carrying to that place a dish contain- ing water with a mixture of pepper and salt^ It was a very vivid experience, and continued as long as her family lived in that place. The imaginary playmate is not necessarily a person, nor even an animated creature. Miss Marguerite H. lived in a town only two blocks from a railroad. Her house had a front door that was seldom used, and a side door which was the usual means of entrance. Whenever she was going from the front around to the side door, she would see a train of cars moving along at her side. Whenever she was walking down town, the train would accompany her, moving along at her side until it came to the railroad track, when it would jump onto the rails and continue its journey. She was not in the least afraid of the train, and even designated it familiarly by the name of John. When her family removed from that town, the train never reappeared. 12 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES 4. When we think of playmates, we think of something that maintains an enjoyable relation to us. So an imaginary playmate may be expected to hold an agreeable relation to the child who experiences it. In many cases, however, the imag- inary playmate is not enjoyed, nor liked, but sometimes is an object of hatred. Thus, Miss Frances B. says that she had a whole family of imaginary playmates. The family was named Kangaroo, and consisted of a man and his wife, with several children. One of the children was especially prominent in the experience. This was a girl named Polly, who was a bad girl and far from handsome. Polly was often left in the care of Frances who hated her, and was quite tyrannical with her. She would sometimes shake Polly, and shut her in the closet, where she could hear her cry and sob very distinctly. Mr. Pearl B. and his real playmate, a boy named Kops, had an imaginary playmate whom they knew by the name of Gor- don. Gordon was a grown up man with a dark beard and backwoods clothes, and quite tall. A favorite sport of the boys was to build dams in the stream, and Gordon was always try- ing to tear them out. Their entire association with Gordon was a fight, or contest. Somewhat similar is the experience of Miss Bessie R. who, with her sister, had an imaginary playmate whom they called Ella. Ella was about eleven years old, had dark eyes and dark hair, which she always wore in a single braid down her back. Neither of the girls liked Ella. Ella was mean and mischiev- ous. She always hurt their dolls, and they would feel distress- ed when they saw Ella coming, and would feel relieved when she went away. Miss Bessie and her sister still speak of Ella, and when their room manifests a very disorderly appearance, they remark that it looks as if Ella had been there. 5. Nearly all the imaginary playmates have names ap- plied to them, but in only a few cases is it possible to suggest why the particular names are applied. The name is not an es- sential attribute to the experience, and in some cases the play- mate has no name. Thus Miss Pearl Y. had an imaginary play- mate who began to appear to her when she was about four years old and continued with her until she was eight. The playmate had dark hair which she wore down her back in two braids. Miss Y. could see the playmate very clearly and could IMAGINARY PLAYMATES 13 hear the tones of her voice when she was speaking. The play- mate had no name, and Miss Y. has never before had her at- tention called to the singularity of the whole experience. In a few cases it is possible to suggest the probable origin of the name. Blanche B. and her sister had two families of imaginary playmates. One family was named Spoopendyke and lived on the south porch. The family consisted of a father, mother, and several children, one of whom, Sarah, was the one with whom the girls were especially acquainted. The other family was named Boosenbark, and the member of the family in whom the girls were especially interested was Nellie. They liked Nellie very much, but Sarah Spoopendyke was not very agreeable, and they rather avoided her. The name Spoopen- dyke was probably suggested by the fact that Spoopendyke was the name of a character around which was built a large and long continued series of very humorous stories. Similarly we find that Miss Ruth W.'s playmate had the name of McGunty, a slightly modified form of the name of the hero of a very popular song. 6. In nearly all cases, the testimony shows that the imag- inary playmate began to appear to the child very early. Much the larger number of persons having the experience say that they have seen the playmate always, or as early as they can remember anything. But in some cases, the origin and de- velopment of the playmate can be traced. Thus Miss Anna Y. says that she had a girl chum who read fairy stories, and ro- manced a great deal. She and her chum developed out of the fairy stories, an imaginary playmate whom they called the Mermaid. She could see the Mermaid very clearly, and could hear her talk. She and her chum would both take their dolls and go to see the Mermaid, and they both played with her. Another case will show the development of the imaginary playmate out of make-believe. Miss Lida C. says that she and her three sisters had a whole town of imaginary playmates who lived in the fence corners around the fields. They had all of them named, and would visit with them, and play with them by the hour. To her, the children were vivid as living persons would be, and she could see them as clearly as she could see living persons. In this case, there can be no doubt that the playmates were developed out of make-believe. The children 14 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES said at first "let us play" so and so. Finally, a really vivid visual projection occurred. Make-believe implies a conscious purpose on the part of the one who employs it. In much the greater number of cases, there can be no supposition of conscious purpose, and the cause for their appearance, and for the particular forms that they take is altogether beyond the reach of explanation. Another case, which really belongs to a different category, will illustrate another aspect of the process by which such ap- pearances begin. Miss Hazel G. heard her mother read aloud the story of Ann of Green Gables. Later, she read another book, Ann of Avon Hall, in which were recorded the deeds of the same characters. Ann soon became to her a vivid person- ality, as real as a living person would be. She could see Ann very clearly, and Ann was regarded as a very dear friend. She often consulted Ann about her plans, and Ann was very sympathetic with her. Similarly, Katherine McL. when she was about six years old, together with a girl friend, came to know something about the activities of Jesse James. They either read about him, or heard some one else read about his exploits. Shortly afterward, they became able to see Jesse James. He appeared to them rather frequently, sometimes in the capacity of a robber about to attack and rob them, and again in the character of a friend willing and ready to lend them assistance. She could see Jesse James as clearly as if he had been a living person, and she could hear him speak. She and her friend often talked about him, and they described to each other how he looked, so that she believes that the appearance was the same to both. 7. The disappearance of the playmate is not often attend- ed with any noticeable event. The disappearance is gradual and does not attract the attention of the child, so that few of the persons who report their experiences are able to fix a def- inite occasion for their disappearance. However, in a few cases the occasion for their disappearance has been noted. Miss Alice B. had two imaginary playmates, Doty and May. She liked Doty the better, although May was a welcome playmate. When they had tea parties, Doty always asked the blessing. One day in winter, they were all in the house, and IMAGINARY PLAYMATES 15 May was sitting in a rocking chair by the fireside, when Miss B.'s mother came in and sat down in the rocking chair on May and killed her. Miss Alice says that she screamed, and did her best to keep her mother from sitting down in the chair, but her mother laughed, not seeing anything in the chair, and sat down. Miss Alice was terribly distressed, and cried for half a day, but May was dead and never reappeared. Similarly, Miss Marian C. reports that her little brother had an imaginary playmate who was a baby. One day, the little brother accidentally killed the baby with a hoe. He was ter- ribly distressed over the circumstance, and still grieves (at the time of the report) over the occurrence, but the baby has not reappeared. Sometimes the disappearance is the result of punishment or scolding, or reasoning with the child by the parent. In the case of Miss Phyllis S. whose imaginary playmate, Sister Ogle, is referred to above, Miss Phyllis had a grandmother, who had an imaginary playmate whom she called the Mermaid, and in whose companionship she took a great deal of satisfaction. Some visitors, however, when they discovered that the grand- mother was talking to imaginary persons, were very much con- cerned, and advised the parents to take measures to stop it because they were sure that it was an indication of mental un- soundness, or some other terribly disgraceful condition. This the parents did, much to the distress of the grandmother, who cried long and hard over the disappearance of the Mermaid, and the conviction that she was not a real creature. So when Phyllis grew into the companionship of Sister Ogle, the grand- mother was determined that she should not be caused the same kind of distress that had occurred to her in the disappearance of the Mermaid. Consequently Phyllis was permitted to enjoy the experience with Sister Ogle to her heart's content. 8. An examination of the accounts of different persons who have experienced imaginary playmates indicates that most of them disappear principally at two periods. There is a tendency in the reports to fix the age at which they disappear either at the age of seven or eight, or at the age of eleven or twelve. These dates correspond approximately to the period of transition from infancy to childhood, or the time of transi- tion from childhood to adolescence. These dates may be rough- 16 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES ly described as the time of the second dentition, or the oncom- ing of the adolescent changes. Such disappearances are not, however, universal. In the case mentioned above, where Miss Bessie R. and her sister had an imaginary playmate Ella, Miss Bessie says that she still catches occasional glimpses of Ella. Miss Mabel B. had two imaginary playmates, whom she knew as Fred and his sister. The sister had no other name, and was rather insignificant in the experience. Fred was about the same age as herself, and grew up, as she grew up herself. She often consulted Fred about what was best for her to do, and she came to believe that it was a pretty good thing to fol- low Fred's advice. She gave several examples of serious con- sequences following occasions when she had refused to heed the admonitions of Fred. I said, "When did they cease to appear?" "Why," Miss Mabel said, "I see them yet. Yesterday, I saw Fred's sister looking over your shoulder in the class." Similarly, Miss Grace M. reports the case of her brother, who is a young man, eighteen years old, and who is very fond of hunting. He has an imaginary playmate who has been with him ever since he can remember, and who still persists. Her brother assures her that whenever he goes to shoot, he looks carefully to see that his playmate is not in the way, and in danger of getting shot. However, this is unusual, and these three cases are about the only ones in the series of 109 that have been carefully studied, in which there is a persistence of the playmate experience into the adult years. 9. Most of the cases referred to above, have been com- paratively simple. But in some examples, the experience be- comes almost bewilderingly complex. Miss Winifred B. when a little girl, liked very much to play with paper dolls. It ap- pears that her imaginary playmate grew out of this circum- stance, and seems to have been developed from make-believe. Her imaginary playmate was her husband, and the father of her paper dolls. Her husband's name was Samuel, and he was decidedly a henpecked husband, for she ordered him around unmercifully. She could see Samuel as clearly as she could see a living person, and could hear him talk, and knew the tones of his voice. When she ceased to play with paper dolls, Samuel gradually faded away. IMAGINARY PLAYMATES 17 Miss Vaida B. had an imaginary playmate whom she called Salt Nellie. Salt Nellie was a little girl of just her own age, whom she was able to see very clearly. Nellie was sullen in appearance, had brown hair, and always wore a rather old, faded dress. She and Nellie never played together, and Nellie never appeared except when Vaida had been naughty. She had the feeling that somehow she had been changed into Nellie when she had been naughty. In this case, it might appear a reasonable suggestion that the appearance of Nellie grew out of a circumstance such as the mother's saying to Vaida, for punishment, "You have been a bad girl. Stand in front of the looking glass, and see how a bad girl looks." Another complex case is illustrated by the experience of Elsie F. Miss Elsie had an imaginary playmate whom she knew as Leah Lynn Jones. Leah was a little girl about as old as herself, who lived in the playhouse in the back yard. Leah had dark hair and always wore a pink and white checked dress. She could see Leah very clearly, and she could also see Leah's mother. She and Leah played together a great deal. They would play school, and study arithmetic together. She would sometimes read aloud to Leah, and she remembers that she read Peck's Bad Boy in this way. Leah had another playmate, a wholly imaginary girl, named Eula. Elsie and Leah frequently quarreled over Eula. It appears that Elsie was jealous of Eula, who was Leah's espe- cial friend. Sometimes Elsie would quarrel directly with Eula, and she never liked her. An exceedingly complex case of imaginary playmates is the experience of Miss Bertha L. Miss Bertha had several real playmates, all of them boys. One boy told her one day, that he had proposed marriage to a girl, wholly imaginary, or make- believe. Both she and the boy friend from that time began to talk about that make-believe girl, whom they came to know as Hazel. Shortly afterward, she began to see Hazel as clearly and as vividly as she could see a living child. Soon thereafter, an imaginary boy named John began to appear. John was a dark complexioned boy. They all played with John, and invited him to their tea parties. They told another family of real children about John and 18 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES Hazel,, and soon the other children began to see them. John subsequently brought with him his imaginary friend, Sam, who was a red headed boy, light complexioned, living down near an old appletree. The real children and the imaginary children played together, and would laugh and shout. They played tag, and fox and geese, and the imaginary children would run and catch them and be caught by them just as real children would be. Not very long afterward, two imaginary grown up persons were added to the list. These were Mr. and Mrs. Shopey who had a large, white, imaginary bulldog. The children, real and imaginary, did not like Mr. and Mrs. Shopey, and would tease Mrs. Shopey in an exasperating manner, which would incense Mr. Shopey who would run after them, and chase them, and set his white bulldog on them. 10. A question would seem natural concerning the places in which these imaginary playmates lived. In probably half the number of cases, the question does not arise in the minds of the children who experience the playmates. The question simply does not occur to them. Inquiry concerning their no- tion of the playmate's place of habitation produces such an- swers as the following: Whenever she went out on the play- ground, the playmate came; or, she just thought about the playmate, and the playmate appeared. But in some cases, the playmate has a definite location. Miss Blanche T. had an imaginary playmate whom she knew as Giddy. Giddy was a grown up woman who lived in a hollow log about a quarter of a mile from her house. When she want- ed to talk to Giddy, she would go to Giddy's house and talk things over with her. Giddy never came to her house. She would sometimes take other persons to Giddy's house, and try to get them to talk to Giddy, but generally the other persons were but little interested in Giddy. She never saw Giddy, and does not know how Giddy looked, for the appearance was al- together auditory. In the accounts referred to above, we have seen that the two imaginary boys, Banter and Dedy, who were the playmates of Miss Lurah M., lived in the upper floor of the old granary. In Miss Bertha L.'s account, the second imaginary boy, Sam, lived down the road under an apple tree. So the playmates of IMAGINARY PLAYMATES 19 Miss Lida C. were located in the fence corners around the farm. The little dwarf of Miss Bessie S. lived in a pile of rocks under a thornapple tree. Miss Julia S. had an imaginary playmate whom she knew as Mary, who would meet her every morning at a certain spot and go to school with her. Mary lived somewhere in an in- definite place up the road that came into Julia's road at that meeting point. In the afternoon, Julia and Mary would come from school together until they reached that spot, when Mary would turn off to go to her own home, while Julia would con- tinue her own road and not see Mary any more until the next day. Sometimes on Saturday afternoons, when Julia wished to play with Mary, she would go down the road to the regular meeting point, when Mary would come to that place and play with her. Mary never came to her house, and she never went to Mary's house. 11. The last case is an example of another feature of this experience which is perhaps the most important of the entire series. In the case of Julia S. she never told anybody else about Mary, at all. It was a repressed idea. The present writer is the first person to whom she has related her experi- ence with Mary. Neither did Rollin R. ever mention to any one, his acquaintance with his little Indian. It is in cases of this kind that we find the greatest injury done to children by parents and teachers. In the case of Mabel B. mentioned above, whose playmates, Fred and her sister, still appear to her, she talked freely to her parents about them. The circum- stance distressed her mother very much, and Mabel says that she has often got her ears boxed, and been called crazy, for re- porting the sayings and doings of Fred and his sister. So in the case of the grandmother of Phyllis S. referred to above, the friends were confident that the talking to herself, since they knew nothing of the imaginary playmate, the Mermaid, was a symptom of insanity, or something else that was very bad. Hence it was that a course of action was adopted, which brought great distress, if not positive injury to the little girl. A really pathetic case appeared in the course of these in- vestigations. One day in the class, I had mentioned that the next day we should consider the matter of imaginary play- mates, and indicated something of the nature of the topic. The 20 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES next day, as soon as that topic was reached, one of the stu- dents, Miss LaP, went out of the room, and returned with her mother. At the conclusion of the discussion, Mrs. LaP. came up to the teacher with her eyes shining, and an expression on her face, that indicated the greatest satisfaction, relief, and ap- proval. Then she related her experience. When she was a little girl, she had two imaginary playmates whom she knew as Jessie and Mollie. They lived in a place near a small creek that ran through her father's farm. She would go to see them al- most every day, and the visit was something of a ceremony. She always dressed up for the occasion, changing her clothes. They always greeted her effusively, and they parted with con- siderable ceremony, inviting her to come back soon for another visit. The appearance of the two imaginary girls was very vivid. She could both see and hear them. She had a brother and a sister with whom she might have played, but she pre- ferred to play with Jessie and Mollie. She thinks that the appearances developed out of make- believe, but they became as vivid as living children would be. Now, after the lapse of forty years, she has a very vivid recol- lection of exactly the appearance they presented. She never told any one about Jessie and Mollie, until she told her daugh- ter the night before. She was rather ashamed of the experi- ence, and apprehensive that it indicated mental derangement, or something else very bad. She experienced a feeling of the greatest relief when she found that they were natural and normal phenomena, and her face was perfectly radiant when she found that I was interested in her account, and that she could talk to me about Jessie and Mollie without being appre- hensive that she would have her sanity questioned.. It is this repression of an idea for many years that con- stitutes the pathetic feature of some cases of imaginary play- mates. What would naturally be an enjoyable and helpful as- sociation, becomes something of which the child feels ashamed and conceals it. The unsympathetic attitude of some parents, playmates and teachers, due to ignorance of the nature of this childish experience, is responsible for this feature. Thus Miss Eva R. had an imaginary playmate whom she called Bertha. Bertha seemed to have something of the rela- tion of an older sister to her. Her association with Bertha was IMAGINARY PLAYMATES 21 very helpful, pleasant, and vivid. One time, she told some other real playmates about Bertha. They laughed at her. From that time Bertha disappeared, and was never seen again, much to her own regret. Another case that is equally pathetic is that represented by Miss Ruth W. Ruth had four sisters older than herself, to whom she was the baby. She had an imaginary playmate whom she called McGunty. McGunty contrasted strongly with herself, having light hair, and being tall, while she herself was short and dark. She could see McGunty very clearly, and could hear her talk. They played keeping house, and made many mud pies. She did not tell her sisters about McGunty, and never talked about her. The older sisters commented upon the fact that she played much alone, and seemed to have such a good time by herself, and would sometimes observe that sne laid a second place at her tea table. One day, when she was not observing the fact, an older sister came quietly up to where she was playing with McGunty, and heard the conversation that she and McGunty were carrying on. In great glee, the older sister went into the house and described the conversation. She was quite ashamed of the fact having become known, and McGunty never appeared again. She tried as hard as she could to bring McGunty back, and was very lonesome without her, but McGunty never reappeared. She had formerly told McGunty all her troubles, as soon as they occurred, which was; a great relief. She was very unhappy when McGunty went away, and regretted it very much, but McGunty's disappear- ance was permanent. Now, what is the explanation and the significance of these experiences of childhood? Are they indications of a diseased mind, or are they real objective existences which are discover- able to the children who have the experience, while invisible to others? There are many persons who will be ready to offer a mystical, mythical, spiritualistic explanation of all these ap- pearances, and whose belief cannot be shaken. The following is a case of imaginary playmate to which the parents of the child have given such a mystical explanation. Wilma G. is a little girl about five years old. Her twin sister, named Winnie, died at about the age of two. Wilma is very bright, almost precocious, learned early to read, and is a 22 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES good speller. She has an imaginary playmate whom she calls Winnie. Almost every day she will report to her mother what she and Winnie have done. She tells her mother how Winnie is dressed, what Winnie says, and describes in detail the circum- stances of her activities. The parents are confident that Wilma sees the spirit of the little dead sister, which is visible to her, but not to other persons, in consequence of the close affinity between the twins. In consequence of the removal of the earth limitations from Winnie, she has progressed more rapidly than other children, and is able to teach Wilma, so that she also progresses rapidly. No amount of argument could, in all probability, con- vince the parents of the truth of any other explanation. Of the same general character is the experience of Orla G. Orla has no recollection of ever having seen his father, who died when Orla was less than three years old. Their table is a square table, and was always set for four. When he was about six years old, Orla began to pull out one of the chairs from the table at meal time, and in reply to a question from his mother, said that he pulled it out for his father. Shortly afterward he began to see his father. The visual appearances at first were faint, but gradually became stronger, until he was able to see his father very clearly, and observe him eating. He described the appearance of his father in such a way that the mother said it was an accurate description. The mother was very much distressed over the circum- stances, and talked to him about it. When Orla was about twelve years old, he decided to discontinue pulling the chair from the table, and not very long afterward, the appearances of the father ceased. It is probable that we have in the phenomena of imaginary playmates, an explanation of all the materializing phenomena of spiritiualism that are not deliberately fraudulent. The spiritualistic and mystical explanation collapses at once when we trace the development of many cases of imaginary play- mates out of make-believe, and arrange a large number of cases in a series that proceed by infinitesimal gradations from those that are scarcely to be classed as genuine cases of imaginary playmates, to those that furnish spiritualists with their stock arguments. IMAGINARY PLAYMATES 23 An imaginary playmate is a visual or auditory idea that becomes as vivid as a visual or auditory percept would be. It is accompanied by a centrally initiated impulse, that is, one which starts in the brain, instead of being accompanied by a peripherally initiated impulse, that is, one which starts in the eye, or the ear, as a percept would be. The centrally initiated impulse that accompanies the experience of the imaginary play- mate, traverses the same brain centers that would be traversed by the peripherally initiated impulse, if it were a real child, or other object that is seen. The principal distinction between the idea which is projected as the imaginary playmate, and other ideas is found in the unusual strength of the centrally initiated impulse which accompanies the process. Children generate a great amount of nervous energy, and as a conse- quence, their centrally initiated impulses are more likely to approximate the strength of the peripherally initiated impulse than are the centrally initiated impulses of grown up persons. This large amount of nervous energy, and the strong cen- trally initiated impulse, is one condition for mental capacity. Hence it is that we find nearly all cases of imaginary play- mates manifested in children who are distinctly above the average capacity for children of their own age. No stupid child ever had an imaginary playmate. Instead of the experi- ence indicating mental derangement, it is rather an indication of unusual mental capacity. It will be observed that a very large number of the cases of imaginary playmates are reported by those who have been only children, or who have been compelled to play much alone. But this lonely condition of the child is not necessary for the development of an imaginary playmate. In the cases already cited, it will be remembered that Mrs. LaP. stated distinctly that she had other brothers and sisters with whom she might have played, but she preferred to play with Jessie and Mollie. Also, in the case of Miss Lurah M., there were several children to whom the two boys, Banter and Dedy, appeared in an audi- tory manner. And then, the complex case of Miss Bertha L. in which several children developed the same group of imagin- ary playmates, including Mr. and Mrs. Shopey and their white bulldog. All such cases show that while the lonely condition of a child may be favorable to the development of an imaginary 24 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES playmate, it is not an essential condition, nor one of very great importance. Not every child has an imaginary playmate. Investigation shows that about six children out of a hundred have this expe- rience. It is possible that the number is somewhat greater than this, but that is the largest proportion that any accurate counting is able to show. There is always the possibility that some persons may have had the experience, and have forgotten it, but the number of such cases is likely to be very small. BIBLIOGRAPHY The references to imaginary playmates are very few in number, and none of them treat the phenomena in an adequate way. The following represent about the only references that are readily available. 1. Caton — The Invisible Playmate. This is a book that gives on pages 15 and 17 an account of a single instance of an imaginary playmate, which there is given a mystical setting. 2. C. H. Cooley — Human Nature and the Social Order. Imaginary playmates are referred to on pages 52 and 53. Mr. Cooley seems to think that imaginary playmates arise out of the developing social nature of the child. He fails to recognize that they are vivid, visual appearances, generally originating in the period of infancy, before even the first indication of a social instinct. 3. H. L. Brittain — A Study in Imagination. Pedagog- ical Seminary, volume 14, p. 137. Imaginary playmates are briefly referred to on page 170. 4. Lillien J. Martin — Ghosts and the Projection of Vis- ual Images." American Journal of Psychology, volume 26, p. 251-257. Accounts of three persons who saw Ghosts. All showed by experiment a capacity to project visual images. Imaginary playmates are briefly referred to. 5. James P. Munroe — Self Projection in a Child. Peda- gogical Seminary, volume 3, p. 182. A fairly good account of an imaginary playmate without any satisfactory recognition of the real nature of the phenomena. 6. F. W. Burnham — Imagination in Children. Peda- gogical Seminary, volume 2, p. 204. Imaginary playmates are briefly referred to on page 212. CHAPTER II PROJECTED IMAGES In order to understand imaginary playmates, it is neces- sary that we should examine some closely related phenomena that are concerned in the study of visual images. It was Francis Galton, in 1883, who first called our attention in an emphatic way to the great differences among individuals in the power to visualize, or to remember and to reproduce images of things that have once been seen. Since that time, comparative- ly little has been done in investigating the differences among persons in this respect, and we have advanced in the knowledge of this capacity only a little way beyond the point at which Galton left it. Galton spoke of all kinds of visual recollection, or repro- duction, as mental imagery, and described three different de- grees; high, medium and low. His method of determining the capacity of different individuals was to ask them to image some scene, such as their breakfast table, and to describe it, judging of the degree of vividness that the image presented. It came as a surprise to him that some of his most eminent scientific friends could scarcely visualize the object at all, and had great difficulty in describing its appearance. He was rather inclined to believe that the power to reproduce clearly an object that had once been seen was detrimental, rather than advantageous, to one who had abstract thinking to do. Galton made no distinction between a visual idea and a projected image. He included projected images under his high degree of visualization, and grouped them with clearly recog- nized visual ideas. It will be necessary to understand the dif- ference between a percept, a visual idea and a projected image. The distinction can be most clearly made by considering tne nervous processes that accompany each of these three mental processes. When we perceive anything visually, a nervous impulse is started in the retina by the light reflected from the object seen, and this impulse is transmitted through some combination of cells in the sight center of the brain. Such an impulse, started in a sense organ by force from the outside, is called a peri- 26 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES pherally initiated impulse. The mental process accompanying a combination of such impulses is called a percept. If, after having perceived an object, we turn away, or close our eyes and try to think of how the object looked, we are experiencing the mental process known as a visual idea. A nervous impulse is traversing the same combination of cells in the sight center that was traversed before, but in this case, the nervous impulse originates, not in the sense organ, but in the brain itself. Such an impulse is called a centrally initiated im- pulse. It is seldom so strong as is the peripherally initiated impulse, and the visual idea is never so vivid, under ordinary circumstances, as is the percept. But sometimes, under extraordinary circumstances the centrally initiated impulse that is transmitted through the brain center, becomes as strong as the peripherally initiated impulse would be; and the accompanying visual idea becomes as vivid as the percept. The centrally initiated impulse may become so strong that it not only goes through the brain center, but flows backward to the retina, producing the same kind of a nervous disturbance in the retina that would be produced by the light waves from an object entering the eye. When such is the case, we experience the kind of a process that may be called a projected image. A projected image, then, is a visual idea that becomes as vivid as a percept would be. It is dis- criminated from a percept by the fact that it is accompanied by a centrally initiated impulse, instead of a peripherally in- itiated impulse. We may also discriminate a visual percept from a visual idea by means of the after image. If we look at an object in a good light, and then shut out the light by closing our eyes, we shall see a representation of the object with Our eyes closed. This representation is known as the after image. It arises from the fact that the nervous processes that are going on in the retina when we look at an object, persist for a short time after the light has been cut off. The after image is called posi- tive, if the relations of light and dark are the same in the after image as they are in the object. The after image is call- ed negative, if the relations of light and dark in the after image are the reverse of what they are in the object. If we close our eyes after having looked at a window, and see the PROJECTED IMAGES 27 panes light and the sash dark, the image is a positive after image. If, however, under the same conditions, the panes are dark and the sash is light, the image is negative. When vve glance at the sun and then close our eyes, we are likely to see a round black spot, which is the negative after image of the sun. If we look intently at a red spot for a few seconds and then look away at a blank wall or a white object, we are likely to perceive on the wall a green spot of the same shape as the red spot at which we previously looked. This is the comple- mentary image, and depends upon the fact that the light en- tering the eye finds a condition which gives rise to the green sensation unchanged, while that which gave rise to the red sensation has been partially exhausted. In the light of the preceding discussion, we may make the following definitions. A vivid sensation is a simple mental process, whose concomitant is the transmission of a peripheral- ly initiated impulse through some brain center. A faint sensation is a simple mental process whose con- comitant is the transmission of a centrally initiated impulse through some sensation center. A percept is a combination of sensations, some of which must be vivid. It is a vivid process. An idea is a combination of faint sensations. It is a faint process. A positive after image is an image accompanied by retinal' changes persisting after the light has been excluded from the eye, in which the relations of light and dark are the same as they are in the object. A negative after image is an image accompanied by retinal changes that persist after the light has been excluded from the eye, in which the relations of light and dark are the converse of what they are in the object. A complementary image is one seen with the eyes open, in which the color is complementary to that shown by the ob- ject. A visual percept manifests an after image. A visual idea will show no after image. But in cases where the visual idea becomes very vivid, and is accompanied by a centrally initiated impulse so strong that the impulse will flow backward to the 28 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES eye and produce a retinal disturbance, there will be an after image, and we may call the mental process a projected image. The projected image, then, differs from a visual idea in its vividness, in the fact that the impulse is very strong, that there is an after image, and that a retinal disturbance occurs. It differs from a percept in the fact that the nervous impulse which accompanies it is centrally initiated while in the percept the accompanying impulse is peripherally initiated. This discussion has been necessary to make clear the dis- tinctions between the different visual processes, and to under- stand what an imaginary playmate is. An imaginary playmate is a projected image. The capacity to project an image, or to project a visual idea is not unusual, but it is far from being universal. Chil- dren differ widely in their capacity to project. The method employed to determine whether a person is able to project an image was as follows: The object employed was a Red Seal Dry Cell Battery. The general color of the cell is red, with a white rectangular space on one side, in which is a red, many-pointed star. On this star printed in white letters, are the words Dry Battery, with the word Red in a curved line above, and the word Seal in a curved line below. The battery was exposed to the observation of the persons for two or three seconds, and then they were asked to see it off to one side, out in space, when the object was covered up. If they said they could see it clearly, they were then asked to place their hands over their eyes and try to discover an after image. If they reported an after image, it was accepted as evidence that they had really a projection of the object. Some examples will show the process, as well as some interesting applications of projection with in- structive modifications. Miss Genevra W. was able to project the image of the bat- tery cell out in space very clearly, and described accurately the color and appearance of the object from the projected image. The image was at least ninety per cent as bright as the real object would be, and an after image appeared in about three seconds. The phenomena are always the same. The image can be projected out in space, it is of different degrees of brightness varying from fifty per cent to one hundred per cent as bright PROJECTED IMAGES 29 as the object, an after image is seen, the time of whose ap- pearance is invariable in the same person, but which differs in different persons. In the larger number of persons the after image is positive, but in some cases it is negative. The presence of the after image is taken as an evidence of the reality of the projection experience. We are so much ac- customed to using the expression, "see a thing," or seeing a relation, or any object of thought, that its use in connection with an object of perception whose material figure is not pres- ent, is likely to be misunderstood. In the projection of the image, there is a real sight experience. There is a real dis- turbance of the retina, which does not occur when we merely remember how a thing looked, or when we conceive it, or when we perceive a relation. This disturbance of the retina is evi- denced by the after image, and there can be little question that the nervous impulse which constitutes the retinal dis- turbance is transmitted backward from the brain center. This is the only satisfactory way of accounting for the observed phenomena, and this does not necessarily contradict the Bell- Magendie law. One example of projection was of such a nature that it led to a line of investigation which seemed at first to promise much. Miss Margaret M. reported that she could see the pro- jected image very clearly and she described it fully. She could read the words on the label, could describe the color, and then in describing the image, remarked that she saw in the image, in the upper left hand corner, a white mark that she had not noticed in the object itself. If she had been describing the ob- ject from memory, she would not have mentioned it. She did not know what it was. An examination of the object showed that it was a small white label, bearing the words Size A, and it was seen in perspective, showing scarcely more than a white line. This experiment, with several similar circumstances re- ported by other subjects, led to a series of tests based upon the assumption that what was projected was the object that had been presented to the eye*. Thus Miss D. stated that when she has read her lesson over, although she has not learned it very well, she is able to project the page of the book out in space, and read from the projected page the words of the text. 30 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES Similarly, the testimony of Miss Loretta B. is to the same ef- fect. Miss B. says that she has had only a single case that she believes would fall into the class described as a projected image. On one occasion, she with other members of her class, was required to commit to memory for recitation, a short poem. She neglected her study, but read the poem over without mak- ing a really serious attempt to commit it to memory. Being^ called upon suddenly to recite, she arose in a somewhat bewild- ered state of mind. While much startled and chagrined, she suddenly saw the page of the book containing the poem pro- jected, and made a brilliant recitation. A few cases such as those described led to a series of ex- periments as follows: A person who had been recognized as having the power of projection, was presented with a page of a book printed in large clear type, without any great number or confusing arrangement of lines and sentences. She was asked to look at a single point on the page, without reading the words and then, after a few seconds of looking, to project the page out in space and read the words. The results from sev- eral experiments seemed to be very promising, but some very instructive errors occurred. Thus Miss Mary A. was shown the title page of a text book on Elementary Psychology. She then projected the page, and read from the projected image, in the proper place, not the conspicuous words Elementary Psy- chology, but the words Holy Bible. Students of Psychology do not generally class the two books together in such a way as to form a really close association. Miss A. said that she knew it was wrong, but those were the words which actually appeared on the projected page. . A similar instructive error occurred in the report of a test with the Red Seal Dry Battery, in the case of Miss Eva K. Miss K. projected the image readily, and described it as at least ninety per cent as vivid as the real object was. A posi- tive after image appeared in about three seconds. The words Red Seal occurred on the label in curved lines, and between the word Red above and the word Seal below, Miss K, read the word guaranteed. The word guaranteed does not occur in this place, but it is found in some lines of smaller printing above the seal. The words Dry Battery occur in the place Miss K. described as occupied by the word guaranteed. PROJECTED IMAGES 31 Such indications demonstrate rather clearly that the pro- jected image is not a projection of the object, nor of the image on the retina, but of the idea in the mind. There is no possi- bility of reading from the projected page anything that has not been read consciously or unconsciously when the page was presented to the eye. The results of the experiments in this direction which at first seemed so promising, are merely de- rived from the fact that all or a portion of the page has really been read, while the subject may believe that the eye has not moved in such a way as to -read it. The only purpose in presenting the object, such as the dry cell in the experiment, is to enable the person to obtain a clear idea that may be projected. After this clear idea has been ob- tained, it may be projected, time after time, and reinstated after the lapse of a considerable interval. Any other clear idea may be projected in the same way, even though it be of something that the person has never di- rectly observed, or experienced* Miss Theresa K. states that she has a friend whose image she is able to project at will. She can see her friend as clearly as if the living person were pres- ent in the room with her. She described on the test occasion the vivid appearance of her friend, could see how she was dressed, described how her hair was combed, and could see her walk. This projection is most vivid, and most easily obtained when she is alone in her room, although she is not limited to this condition. It is possible for her to project the image of her friend in a classroom where other students are, although not so readily as if she were alone. Similarly, Miss Eva K. projected and described clearly a room in her house at home, and indicated an indefinite number of minute details, which she testified that she could see as clearly as if she were present in the room at the time. Miss Edith B. projected the image of her mother, seated in a rocking chair, with her knees crossed, and assured me that the image was as clearly visible to her as the actual living presence of her mother would be. She assures me that what she sees is a really visible, projected image of her mother, not merely a memory of how her mother looked on some particular occasion. Comparatively few students make use of their power of 32 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES projection in studying their lessons. Miss Jean S. states that when she is demonstrating a problem in geometry, she does not depend upon the figure in the book nor upon the black- board, but projects a figure out in space and employs that in making the demonstration. Nearly all the persons who can project an image testify that it is of assistance to them, but they make little systematic use of it. However, Miss Mary A. says that she has rather avoided its use. She has a kind of feeling that it is somewhat improper, or likely to be injurious, or indicative of a mental tendency that is not to be talked about in public, but rather to be concealed. Her capacity to project is rather high. Some teaching methods appear to have been devised by some teacher who has a capacity to project, apparently in the belief that this power is universal in children, or may be culti- vated until every child can project. When such methods are employed in classes that are not especially selected, it will be found that some children are bright and shining lights, capable of being employed to demonstrate the revolutionary character of the teaching methods. These children may be paraded at teachers' meetings to the amazed wonder of less fortunate teachers whose children show by other methods no evidence of approximating the wonderful ability of the show pupils. But it is likely to be the case that a large majority of the children left at home are not so responsive, and must be ranked with the lower incapable, common herd. The methods that demand a power of projection are not likely to be suitable for a very large proportion of the children. The number of persons who have the capacity to project an idea, while large in the aggregate, is not proportionally very great. A casual inquiry of any large class, after an ex- planation of what is meant by projection, will elicit a response of about thirty per cent. The actual results, obtained by care- ful tests, show about three per cent. The actual number probably lies between the two estimates. I have obtained posi- tive results from about half as many persons as have reported the experience of imaginary playmates. It seems probable that the number of cases among grown up persons is much less than in children. PROJECTED IMAGES 33 BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Alexander — Visual Images. Psychological Review, volume 11, p. 139. Some discussion of projected images. Says criterion diffi- cult to obtain. (See page 324). Says no distinction really be- tween the mental image, the projected image, and the after image. 2. J. M. Gillette — After Images. Psychological Review, volume 6, p. 420. Experiments which are believed to prove that an after image is accompanied by a retinal process. 3. Burnham — Imagination in Children. Pedagogical Seminary, volume 2, p. 205-6. Cites many examples of project- ed images. Emphasizes the importance of studying individual differences. 4. Colvin — Nature of the Image. Psychological Review, volume 15, p. 158. Claims for the image the same sort of ob- jectivity as that which belongs to sensation. Rather a good synopsis of the opinions of other writers. Little value as an original contribution. 5. Downey — After Images From Mental Image. Psy- chological Review, volume 8,, p. 42. Account of a series of ex- periments. Not clear that the images are projected images, but they appear to be so. 6. Galton — Inquiries into Human Faculty. P. 57-79. Everyman Edition. CHAPTER III IMAGES IN READING The explanation of projected images in the preceding chap- ter not only discloses to us the real nature of imaginary play- mates, but contributes to our understanding of a series of closely related phenomena which we may know as Images in Reading. The experience is one which is manifested in a com- paratively small number of persons, but is of great importance in several directions. Some persons experience a series of pro- jected images of the events as they are reading, and get the meaning of what they read by means of these projected images. The most difficult thing in teaching reading is to cause the children to get an adequate meaning from what they read. The words may be perfectly meaningless to the children, and may cause no thought to originate in their minds. Such read- ing is, of course, of no value as reading, and the child derives no benefit from it. Pronunciation of the words, inflection, em- phasis, expressive utterance, all are worse than useless, unless these qualities are the expression of thought aroused in the mind. The nature of meaning is not very satisfactorily deter- mined. Some persons who are extreme advocates of what has been described as the muscular movement theory of conscious- ness, assert that the meaning is the muscular movement that accompanies the perception of the words. The muscular move- ment that this theory contemplates, may be the movement of the muscles of the arms, or exterior parts of the body, but it is generally the movement of such muscles as those of the larynx, the vocal organs or the internal organs of the body. This theory of meaning, however,, has very little to commend it, to any one who is not obsessed with the theory that all con- sciousness is motor, and that we think with our muscles instead of with our brains. The meaning is something associated with the recognition of the words, but it is different from them. Words have no meaning unless they are associated with something already known. Meaning comes as the result of association, and it de- pends upon the recognition of the relation between the ideas that the words express, and some previous experience. Differ- IMAGES IN READING 35 ent words have different meanings and different shades of meaning, dependent upon the mental processes which are caused to arise in the mind as a result of the recognition of the words. Hence we may say that oral reading is the expression of the thought that is aroused in us by the words on the print- ed page. Different persons have different methods of making the associations that constitute the meaning of what is read. With a small number of persons, the meaning consists of a series of visual pictures projected out into space, or appearing in some definite position on the page that is read. Thus the following accounts, brought out by careful questioning and comparison with the experience of others,, will indicate the manner in which some persons obtain meaning from what is read. Mr. Ralph E. reports that he projects images of the scenes of nearly everything that he reads. The images appear as a succession of scenes which, while they are decidedly real, are less vivid than the real objects would be. If he is reading Hia- watha, a succession of scenes appear that are about as vivid as the real scenes would be if they were seen in the late dusk of the evening. His estimate is about fifty per cent as bright as the real object would be. In the scenes appear all the primary colors. If he were reading about a field of clover, or any scene in which clover is mentioned, he would experience the sensation of clover color. When he is reading about a baseball game, he projects the movements of the players, and the entire game is enacted be- fore him. He has no image for relation words, but the story of what he is reading appears before him in visual scenes. These visualized scenes belong to the same group of phe- nomena as do the projected images described in the preceding chapter, and whenever the test is made, an after image ap- pears. Miss Avis R. visualizes everything that she reads, and the projected images follow one another along the line of her reading, just above the top of the line. There is no color in the images, but they appear to be at least fifty per cent as bright as the real scene would be. There is a negative after image that appears whenever she makes the test for it by clos- ing her eyes. The definite location of the images which Miss R. describes, 36 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES occurs in many cases of projection in reading, but it is not uni- versal. The following account presents in the clearest possible way, the extent to which this power of visualization in reading may go. Miss Clarissa F. visualizes everything that she reads. In reading Hiawatha, she sees clearly the scenes and the charac- ters of the story. The images that she sees do not appear as pictures, but seem to be real objects, full of color, and quite as vivid as the real objects would bej. She feels herself to be in the midst of them, and the images are vividly real and all around her. She dislikes to have pictures in books, because they do not correspond to her images, and are not so vivid and beautiful as those which she projects. She prefers reading a book to going to a moving picture show. In fact, she rather dislikes to go to the movies, because she can more easily enjoy a better show of more brilliant and more beautiful pictures by reading a book at home. In the case of Miss Avis R. referred to above, mention is made of the fact that the images are seen with reference to the lines of print that are read. In many cases, the images are not definitely located, but in some examples their location can be definitely described. Miss Grace L. reports that she seems to interpret all her reading by means of the projected visual images of the ideas which she reads. When she is read- ing Hiawatha, she sees a succession of images that shade into one another. The images are seen, not as pictures, but as real objects would seem, and are always in front of her. Miss L. says about four feet in front of her, but her answers to other questions indicate that her conception of measured distance is rudimentary. The images are located with reference to the person and not with reference to the page. • The visualized images are at least fifty per cent as bright as the real objects would be. Miss Mildred M. also visualizes everything that she reads, and the succession of pictures that she projects is located at the top of the page. When the images are not located with reference to the page, they are more likely to be represented as real objects than as pictures. When the projected images are conceived to be real objects, they are located somewhere out in space, and IMAGES IN READING 37 the person is likely to have the feeling of being in the midst of the scenes. In some such cases, the background on which the images are projected is some locality with which the person is already familiar. An example of the last characteristic is the case of Mr. Robert T. Mr. T. projects images of the situations in almost everything that he reads. The images are not pictures, nor illustrations, but images of real things with color and move- ment of the characters. These images are very nearly one hundred per cent as bright as the real objects would be. They are not located with reference to the page of the book, but seem to be located out in space. Associated with nearly all the projected images of the reading, is a background of a single familiar locality. They seem to be projected upon a back- ground of King's Flats, a definite Ypsilanti situation. Very similar is the testimony of Miss Helen H. Miss H. visualizes everything that she reads,, and she reads very slowly in order that the pictures shall have time to pass along. She does not like to have pictures in books, because the illustrations are not likely to agree with the scenes that she projects, and when they do not, she does not like the book. The images that she projects do not seem to be pictures, but seem to be images of real things, or objects that she per- ceives. She estimates that they are at least seventy-five per cent as bright as the real objects would be under the same conditions. The images that she projects are likely to be associated with familiar localities. If she is reading a story in which a river is mentioned as one of the circumstances, the river that would appear in the projected images would be the Huron River, with which she is familiar. In reading, she loses the consciousness of the words, and watches the changing scenes as they are projected. It is highly interesting to listen to the testimony of a per- son who has two methods of getting meaning from his reading. Mr. Lloyd G. reports that when he is reading, he is not con- scious of the words of the book, but is conscious of looking upon a continuous series of scenes. They are not pictures, but scenes of real objects that he projects. They seem to be in the 38 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES distance, and are rendered small by perspective. They seem to partake of the nature of miniature scenes. Mr. G. likes to have pictures in books, especially pictures of the characters of the story. He sees the characters that are pictured in the book, but in his projected images he sees them in a wholly different setting - . His own characters seem to have no distinguishable faces, but they take on the faces represented by the pictures in the book. The projected scenes are about seventy-five per cent as bright as the real scenes would be. Mr. G. finds it difficult to read technical works, because it is hard to project, or picture, the things told about there. He has two ways of reading; one by means of projected images and one without. The second method is very laborious and slow. He is somewhat at a loss to understand how some per- sons can enjoy reading at all without the capacity to picture the incidents in visual form. Miss Marguerite S. projects images of almost everything that she reads. The images are extraordinarily vivid. She be- lieves that they are one hundred per cent as vivid as the real objects would be. The objects appear in their natural colors, and are not the colors of pictures, but visual projected repre- sentations of real objects, with their motions, colors, and she even listens for the sounds that they make. Miss Evelyn B. also projects images of what she is reading about. These images are in their natural colors, and fully one hundred per cent as bright as the real object would be. The images are not located with reference to the page, but they seem to be all around her, and she seems to be living in the midst of them. She dislikes to have pictures in books, because the pictures do not agree with her projections,- and the discrep- ancy makes her feel uncomfortable. Miss Irene S. projects images of the scenes and characters of the story that she is reading, and these projected images are at least seventy-five per cent as bright as the real objects would be. They seem to be some distance away from her, and there is considerable color in the images. They contribute a great deal to her enjoyment of what she is reading, and she believes that she would not enjoy reading if she could not see the images of her own projection. IMAGES IN READING 39 This capacity to project ideas of what she reads is of much service to her in arithmetic. Whenever she is asked such a question as "A man had seventeen cows in one pasture and eight in another. How many cows did he have in both?" she sees a group of brown cows in a square pen, moving around and feeding, and a similar group in another pen. Words that express relation have their projected counter- parts as truly as do words that represent material objects. The word of, for example, presents a picture of two words with something between. So the relation words are all of them represented by some kind of a visual projected image. The above discussion represents the general tendency of the description of the process of projecting images from read- ing, as it is illustrated in twenty-one cases that have been studied. These twenty-one cases have been collected from about eight hundred students, but the proportion must not be considered representative. The census is far from complete among this number of students. The probability is great that twice the number of cases might have been collected,. These cases represent examples of visual projection. No attempt was made to study the reading of those who obtain the meaning of what they read by visual ideas which are not projected. Many persons obtain the meaning of what they read by means of visual ideas that are not projected, some by means of auditory projection, and still others seem to obtain meanings in ways that are neither visual nor auditory. CHAPTER IV HALLUCINATIONS The subject of hallucinations has attracted a great deal of attention ever since the mind of man was turned to the study of his own mental experiences. Many volumes have been de- voted exclusively to this one topic, and hundreds of articles may be discovered by turning to the files of psychological mag- azines. Hallucinations constitute one of the psychological topics that are of perennial interest to the non-psychological reader. They furnish the basis for ninety-nine per cent of all ghost stories, and constitute the determining factor for many his- torical events of world wide importance. The justification for introducing a discussion of such a well known topic in this place is the fact that they belong to the same category as do imaginary playmates, projected images, and images in reading. A hallucination is a mental process which is accompanied by a centrally initiated impulse as strong as a peripherally initiated impulse would be under the same circumstances. It is an idea that becomes as vivid as a percept. We distinguish a percept from an idea by its greater vividness; and when an idea takes on an unusual vividness, we are unable to distin- guish it, and consequently believe that we experience a per- cept. Hence it is that we rarely discover that we have experi- enced a hallucination. No doubt, many persons really have the experience without knowing it. Any condition that induces an unusual strength of. a cen- trally initiated impulse in the brain is likely to be favorable to hallucinations. Any condition that induces inflammation of brain tissue, such as the condition that occurs in cases of brain fever, delirium tremens, or maniacal insanity, is likely to be accompanied by hallucinations. So, also, children and young persons, are more likely to ex- perience hallucinations than are older persons, since they gen- erate nervous energy in excess. No doubt, little children ex- perience a very great number of hallucinations, and the life of a little child is a constant struggle to distinguish hallucinations from actual percepts. We shall need, for our study, to distinguish a hallucination HALLUCINATIONS 41 from a closely related experience that is often confounded with it, that is, an illusion. We can best make the distinction clear by reference to the nervous impulses that accompany them. In a hallucination, there is no peripherally initiated impulse. The impulse is altogether centrally initiated. A common way of describing this is to say that in a hallucination we see some- thing when there is nothing to see. In the case of an illusion, there is a peripherally initiated impulse, but it is carried to the wrong brain center. There is something there to see, but we see the wrong thing. We do not see the thing that is there, but we see something else. With this distinction, we can examine some examples of hallucinations with great profit. As an example of a typical hallucination, we may consider the following: Miss Edna P. was staying all night with a friend whose father, as well as the rest of the family, had gone away. The two girls were alone in the house, and slept late the following morning. About ten o'clock, Miss P. got up and went into an adjoining room, when she saw her friend's father standing at a wash stand washing his hands. He looked at her and smiled. She went back to her friend and told her that her father had returned, which surprised her friend very much. They went back to the room to see him, when he could not be found, and there were no in- dications that any one had been there. The friend's father re- turned the next day. This is a good example of a hallucination. Miss P. was fortunate in the conditions being of such a nature that the hallucinatory character of the experience was easily discovered. If the father had been dead, or died soon afterward, there would have been a strong tendency to assert that the appear- ance was connected with the fact of death. The appearance would have been explained as a ghost, or a materialized spirit. A slight tendency toward mysticism, or spiritualism, would have adduced it as indubitable evidence of the existence of a separable astral body. But under the circumstances, there can be little disposition to adopt a mythical, mystical, supernatural explanation of the event, especially in the light of our preced- ing studies of projected images, images in reading, and imag- inary playmates. A similarly clear case of hallucination, uncomplicated by 42 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES any contributory circumstance is seen in the following: Miss Mabel B. was one day walking with a friend from the Normal School building to the Science building between classes. She met a little boy with a blue cambric waist and corduroy trou- sers. The boy passed her on one side, stepping off the sidewalk to do so. Almost as soon as he had passed, Mabel asked her companion, Mrs. McC, what that little boy was doing there at that time in the day, and turned around to look again at him. There was no little boy there, and Mrs. McC assured her that no little boy had passed them, or was present at the time. This case is instructive from the fact that it occurred in bright daylight, with other persons present. There was noth- ing confusing nor mystical about the entire experience, and no temptation to give it a supernatural nor mythical interpreta- tion. Both of the preceding examples have been cases of simple hallucinations, in which the hallucinatory experiences involved persons. But hallucinations are frequently much more com- plex, and are not limited to appearances of persons. Miss Phebe C. reports that one afternoon she was standing at the gate by her house, looking toward the northwest. In front of her she saw a large house surrounded by a big fence, and in front of it a large suspension bridge. The appearance was very clear and definite. The background toward the northwest consisted of a mass of trees and shrubs. The image disappear- ed in a few minutes. On another occasion, when she was about nine years old, she was hanging upon a farm gate near the back of her house. She was looking up into the sky, and she saw near the zenith, a number of trees somewhat enclosing a small .lake. Behind the trees she saw a deer come out running away from three hunters on horseback. The deer ran through the pond and escaped. At least, she did not see the hunters catch the deer. The general characteristic of a hallucination is the fact that it occurs a single time, and there is no regular periodic recurrence of the experience. It is this fact more than any other that induces a belief in the reality of the perception. Cases of imaginary playmates are not hallucinatory, because by continued repetition, the children come to recognize that the playmate, despite its vividness, is not a real, living child. HALLUCINATIONS 43 But the single instance of any particular hallucination does not permit a comparison of one experience with another, and there is little opportunity to correct the false perception. Conse- quently, a hallucination is generally believed to be a real per- cept, or a perception of a real thing. However, there are cases of recurrent hallucinations. Thus Miss Fay P. frequently sees a cat, which is usually black, but may be of other colors. The cat is generally seen on the floor, nearly in front of her, so that she feels herself in danger of stepping on it. The appearance never lasts more than half a minute, and very quickly disappears when she looks directly at it. She does nol remember when the cat first appeared to her, but probably as early as she was able to remember anything. It now appears to her perhaps once in three months. ' Somewhat similar is the experience of Miss Hazel S. who reports that she experiences the hallucination of a woman m a black dress, passing outside of her sitting room window. The person is a stranger, and investigation invariably shows that no person has passed the window, nor is there any one in sight when she undertakes to investigate. The experience began when she was about fifteen years old, and then it occurred al- most every day. She sees it occasionally yet, the latest appear- ance being about six weeks previous to this report. In the last two cases there is very little distinction to be discovered between such a hallucination and an imaginary playmate. The recurrence of the event leads to a recognition of its non-real character, and a disbelief in the veridical nature of the experience. This is one of the principal distinctions oe- tween the imaginary playmate and the hallucinatory experi- ence. The distinction between a hallucination and an illusion is the fact that there is a real objective basis for the illusion, while there is none for the hallucination. But in some cases even this distinction becomes obscured, as in the following in- stance. Mrs. May W. reports that when she was a little girl, one day she was lying on the. floor- looking at some plates in a fashion magazine. Suddenly, two of the lady figures in the plates walked out of the picture into the room and disappeared. She called to her mother inquiring where the two ladies had gone, and searched for them a long time without finding them. 44 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES Somewhat similar is the report of Miss Laura McN. Miss McN. says that her father died before she was born. There was an enlarged picture of him hanging at the foot of her bed in her room. One night, when she was in bed, and much troubled over some circumstance of the day, her father walked right out of the picture and took on the size of a man. She was frightened at first, but gradually became less so. Her father talked to her and comforted her. Since that time, she has frequently seen her father and has consulted with him when she was in trouble. She disclaims any belief in spiritual- ism, and knows the distinction between her father's appear- ance and that of a living man. In this case we have a peculiar combination of an illusion, whose material basis is the picture, an imaginary playmate, recognized in the habitual character of the experience, and a hallucination. It is of the kind, too, in which certain types of mind would revel in furnishing a mystical explanation of the circumstance. Another illustration of the close relation between halluci- nation and illusion is found in the experience of Miss Kather- ine D. Miss D. was one time talking to a woman at her own home. Suddenly, the woman changed into a skeleton, showing the appearance of the articulated bones. Miss D. was very much startled, but reached out her hand and touched the woman, when she immediately changed back again from a skel- eton to a woman. There can be no explanation of such an experience as this, and in fact none is needed, except that for some unexplained reason, the nervous impulse, established in the retina, had ceased to pass through the combination of cells in the brain that corresponded to the appearance of the woman, and had switched off to the combination that corresponded to the ap- pearance of the skeleton. It was intimated above that little children are more sus- ceptible to hallucinations than are grown up persons. This must be associated with the fact that children generate ner- vous energy in large amounts, in excess of the demands made upon it by the bodily activities. They would neither play, nor grow, if they did not. Hence we shall find that children ex- perience hallucinations as naturally as they play or grow, and HALLUCINATIONS 45 for the same reason that we find in children the phenomena of imaginary playmates. We fail to consider the hallucinatory experiences of children as much as we ought to do, principally because the children themselves do not recognize their hallucinatory char- acter. They cannot testify to their experiences, except by their actions. It is impossible for us to inquire systematically of a baby, "See here. Will you kindly tell me whether you ex- perience hallucinations or not?" But in many cases we can discover that children have ex- periences which we can interpret and understand only if we are acquainted with the nature of hallucinations, and if we have them in mind as possible explanations of children's ac- tions. The following case will indicate the highly necessary character of the knowledge of hallucinations if we are to deal justly and wisely with children. Miss Clare 0., when a little girl, went to bed one night, in a dark room. Suddenly the room seemed to be illuminated brightly, although no source of illumination was apparent. In the light she saw two figures, like Brownies, fantastic creatures of rainbow colors, and very animated. They pointed at her and laughed and talked, although she was unable to hear their voices. She screamed, and her aunt came and took her into the next room where it was quite light. Her aunt placed her on the arm of a chair, and the two figures (Miss 0. did not use the word Brownies) perched upon the other arm and looked at her and laughed. In some such experience as this, we find the explanation of the fears and terrors that many children manifest. If the children could tell us what they see, or if we had sufficient knowledge of the facts of hallucinations, we should be able to deal more wisely than we now do in many cases, with children. In all the cases adduced as examples of hallucination above, the experience has been a visual one. But hallucinations may occur in any sense, and may be of hearing or touch, or of other kinds. The following examples will illustrate hallucinations of hearing: Miss Lulu M. reports that she has often heard her mother calling her, and has heard her mother make some remark when she was far distant from her. On several occasions she has re- 46 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES turned home from a distance of two or three blocks, asking what her mother had said, only to find that the entire experi- ence was hallucinatory. Similarly, Miss Mabel B. was studying in her room when she distinctly heard her mother call her. She went out into the hall, opening the door to do so, but no one was in the halL Then she went down stairs and asked of the family living in the house, where her mother was. She was assured that no one was present in the house except the immediate family, and that her mother had not called her. In these cases, the impulse of exaggerated intensity had traversed the brain centers in the region for hearing rather than in the more common one of sight. So the hallucinations may be observed in any sense, although sight and hearing are the more common. In all cases of hallucination heretofore adduced there can be no supposition of any disease, present or prospective, phy- sical or mental. A hallucination is not an abnormal experi- ence, nor is it indicative of disease of any kind. However, where there is a diseased condition of the brain that is accom- panied by inflammation, hallucinations are likely to occur. Brain fever and delirium tremens are nearly always accom- panied by hallucinations. Miss Ethel K. reports that one day she had the unusual experience of hearing a band of music all day. The band play- ed no recognizable tune, but all day there were strains of beau- tiful music heard. The experience was very pleasant, and she enjoyed it very much. Soon afterward, she had a spell of ty- phoid fever. It seems rather likely, in this case, that the hal- lucinatory audible experience of the music was associated with the oncoming of the disease. A less pleasing experience associated with disease is of the kind reported by Miss Gertrude P. Miss P. was suffering from nervous prostration induced by overwork. While lying in her bed, she would frequently see various friends of hers assuming strange attitudes and grotesque shapes. They would appear to her to be dancing upon the window sills and perched upon various parts of her bed. Various kinds of animals would ap- pear to her as different kinds of religions, and would demand that they be worshiped. There is no limit to the kinds of hal- HALLUCINATIONS 47 lucinations that may accompany disease, but hallucination must not be considered as essentially indications of present or oncoming disease. The phenomena of hallucinations have attracted the at- tention of investigators for a long time, and a whole library of books has been written upon the subject. In European coun- tries an investigation was undertaken many years ago to dis- cover how many persons had ever experienced hallucinations, and the same kind of an inquiry was carried out in the United States by Professor James. The result showed that about ten per cent of all the persons who answered the inquiries had had the experience. Also, it was found that the greater number of cases of hallucination reported, had occurred when the per- sons were young. More persons had experienced hallucinations between the ages of fifteen and twenty, than between the ages of twenty and twenty-five. More had experienced hallucina- tions between twenty and twenty-five than between twenty- five and thirty, while the number of hallucinations decreased as the persons grew older. If it were possible to secure an accurate report from younger persons, it would probably be found that the number of hallucinations rapidly increases as the age becomes less. It is nearly certain that all persons have experienced hallucinations, especially when they are very young children. The reason why so small a number of persons report the experience is because the hallucinatory character of the experiences has not been discovered. Unless a person discovers that the thing he really saw was not there to see, he would never report it as a halluci- nation!. Only those hallucinations that are discovered can be reported. Also, it is extremely probable that many of the hal- lucinations that are experienced in early childhood, are for- gotten. In my own inquiries, I have found that about thirteen per cent of the persons have recognized experiences as being of a hallucinatory character; but this does not prevent the conclu- sion that all persons have, or may have had hallucinations. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. James — Principles of Psychology, volume 2, p. 114- 131. Note especially that Mr. James admits the possibility of a 48 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES backward flowing impulse, on p. 131. He describes a halluci- nation as a true perception, but makes rather a difficult mean- ing for perception. 2. Parish — Hallucinations and Illusions. Contemporary- Science Series. Chapter 3, p. 77-109. Especially devoted to a report of the International Census of Hallucinations, classify- ing them according to various characteristics. Footnote on p. 65 says children are especially susceptible to hallucinations. On p. 109,, says hallucinations are very quickly forgotten. His theory of the nature and the cause, as well as his definition of hallucination, is very obscure and involved. 3. Boris Sidis — Nature of Hallucinations. Psychological Review, volume 11, p. 15-104. A long, technical, and involved paper. Discusses the nature of perception, and says that hal- lucination is a secondary perception. CHAPTER V NUMBER FORMS It was Francis Galton who first called our attention in an emphatic way, definitely to an experience that many persons have, but which many others do not have. This experience has come to be known by the name of number forms, and consists of a definite way of thinking of the series of ordinal numbers. This can best be explained by a description of a few examples. Miss Ethel G. always thinks of the numbers from 1 to 100 in a definite form. The numbers from 1 to 15 run in a series of three curves joined to each other in a general horizontal di- rection from left to right. She sees the numbers 4 to 10 crowd- ed together, while the others are more widely spaced. Then the form turns vertically upward in a sharp curve carrying the numbers 16 to 20. From 20 to 40 the numbers are ar- ranged in a line nearly horizontal, running toward the left, approximately parallel to the line 1 to 15. From 40 to 60 the figure makes a round turn upward, and the numbers 60 to 1 00 are borne on a vertical extension of this line. There are two facts to be observed in the description of such a figure. The first fact is that when we say a person sees the numbers arranged this way, we mean that he has a visual idea, not a projected image, of these numbers. In no case of the 67 examples which have been collected for this study has any one described the figures as being projected. The second fact to be considered, is that, although in our description we may use the phrase that the line runs so and so, and bears the numbers, this phrase does not necessarily mean that there is an actual line apparent in the figure. In some cases,, the lines actually appear; but in many other cases, the figure consists of an arrangement of the numbers in a certain sequence to each other, and the figure is drawn on paper, by making lines that connect the positions of successive numbers. In Miss G.'s case, there are no lines in the figure, but the numbers are arranged in such a position that the line connecting their positions will assume the shape indicated in the diagram. Another figure will also be very instructive. Miss Bertha So always sees (has a visual idea of) the numbers arranged in a well defined form. It consists of a series of curves extending 50 IMAGINAKY PLAYMATES DESCRIPTION OF PLATE I. Fig. 1.— Number form of Ethel G. Fig. 2. — Number form of Bertha S. Fig. 3. — Number form of Marjorie V. Fig. 4. — Number form of Marguerite S. Fig. 5. — Number form of Carrie G. Fig. 6. — Number form of Martha M. Fig. 7. — Number form of Ruth R. Fig. 8. — Number form of Ruby C. Note the two branches. (tfcULX too ttu.*, <§> lO HO * V V& %\ * is a very clear case of the persistence of the false directions after years of repeated experience in shifting from one set of directions to the other. Miss M. lives several miles out of Jackson, and she attended school in that city. Whenever she goes from her home to Jack- son, the directions are perfectly correct until she arrives at a certain corner in the town, when they appear to change. No amount of reasoning, or observation can produce any other effect. The persistence of the false system of directions is pro- nounced in nearly every case. However, after a prolonged ab- sence from one locality, especially if the original stay has been brief, it is possible that a different system of directions may be substituted for the false system that was first acquired. With the present writer, such a change has occurred in a few places, noticeably so in Philadelphia. On a first visit to that city, the directions were wrong, and the sun rose in the north. After an interval of two years, the directions were recognized on a second visit as correct. But in places where the stay was pro- longed, as at Champaign, the background built up on the basis 124 IMAGINARY PLAYMATES of the correct directions, is never likely to be substituted for the illusory one. Whether the directions appear correct or not, will depend upon the background of directions upon which the locality is perceived. This background evidently has for its concomitant, some particular combination of cells, in the brain which is slightly different for each series of directions. So a substitu- tion of one background for another is accompanied by a slight shifting of the nervous impulse from one combination of cells into another only slightly different. An inquiry of one class of 63 students disclosed the fact that more than two-thirds of them did not have any back- ground of direction for their perceptions, and did not feel the need of any. Forty-four of them asserted that it made no dif- ference to them whether they knew which way was north or not. Such persons can never experience the feeling of being turned around, which makes some of us so uncomfortable. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. Binet, Alfred — Reverse Illusions of Orientation. Psy- chological Review, volume 1, p. 337. The classical article. Prac- tically the only original contribution of much value. Gives ac- counts of nine persons who have had the experiences, together with his own. Suggests that perhaps it is caused by an affec- tion of the semicircular canals. 2. Baldwin's Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology. Volume 2, p. 242. Article Orientation. Gives merely a definition of the state,, and refers to Binet's article for references. Says the turning is nearly always ex- actly 180 degrees, or 90 degrees. Index of Cases Cited Alice B. 14 Alice F. 120 Alta M. 76 Anna Y. 13 Arthur H. 113 Arthur M. 101 Avis R. 35, 36 Bertha L. 17, 18, 23 Bertha S. 49, 60 Bessie C. 8 Bessie J. 112 Bessie R. 12, 16 Bessie S. 11 Blanche B. 13 Blanche C. 73 Blanche T. 18, 102 Carrie G. 52, 56 Catherine C. 112 Christine M. 9 Clare 0. 45, 82 Clarissa F. 36 Dessie I. 72 Dorothy D. 72 Edith B. 31 Edith W. 82 Edna P. 41 Edna S. 81 Elizabeth M. 123 Elsie F. 17 Emily B. 80 Ethelyn W. 76 Ethel G. 49, 61 Ethel K. 46 Etta G. 61 Eva K. 30, 31 Eva R. 20 Evelyn B. 38 Faye P. 10, 43, 75 Florence G. 110 Florence J. 60 Florence K. 111 Florence S. 61 Floyd E. 81 Frances B. 12 Frances H. 81 Fred F. 57, 61, 66, 70 Geneva S. 82, 121 Genevieve H. 94 Genevra W. __ 28, 58, 61, 64, 70 Georgia F. 58 Gertrude P. 46 Gladys M. 110 Glenn H. 101 Grace E. 120 Grace L. 36 Grace M. 16 Harry H. 102 Hattie C. 114 Hattie M. 57 Hazel G. 14 Hazel S. 43 Henry S. 88 Helen H. 37 Hester P. 91, 116 Hetta F. 65, 67 Ida F. 57, 64 Ida P. 75 Ina F. 114 Irene S. 38, 57, 70 Ivol S. 86 Jean S. 32 J. J. J. 80 Julia S. 19 Katherine D. 44 Kathryn McL. 14 Laura McN. 44 Leona H. 64, 73 Lida C. 13, 19 Lillian S. 110, 112 Lillian W. 58 Lillie C. 80 Lottie G. 11 Lloyd G. 37 Loretta B. 30 Lucile A. 58 Lucile B. 9 Louise H. 113 Lulu M. 45, 87 Lurah M. 10, 18, 23 Mabel B. 16, 19, 42, 46 Mabel P. 70 Margaret M. 29 Margaret McG. 65, 116 Marguerite H. 11 Marguerite S. 38, 53, 66 Marian B. :___ 61 Marian C. 15 Marian H. 90 Marie McC. 81 Marjorie S. 61, 90, 95 Marjorie V. __ 52, 61, 64, 66, 70 Marjorie W. 75 Martha M. 55, 58 Mary A. 30, 32 Mary P. 75 Mary S. 83 Maude R. 60, 65 Mira F. 60 Mira M. 81 Mildred A. 104 Mildred M. 30, 110 Nathan H. __ 109, 114, 117, 121 Olga M. 80 Orla G. 22, 96 Pearl B. 12 Pearl Y. 12 Phebe C. 42 Phyllis S. 10, 15, 19 Ralph E. 35 Robert T. 37, 53 Rollin R. 9, 19 Ruby C. 7, 56 Ruth R. 58 Ruth W. 13, 21 Sadie M. 82 Sarah R. 89 Tacy A. 81 Teresa K. 80 Tidy P. 65 Tina H. 110 Vaida B. 16 Wilma G. 11, 21 Winifred B. 16 Zaida C. 92 Zilpha P. 101, 104 Index of Authors Alexander, H. B. 33 Binet, Alfred 124 Brittain, H. L. 24 Buchner, E. F. 59 Burnham, W. H. 24, 33, 106 Calkins, M. W. 79 Canton, William 24 Chalmers, Lillian H. 59 Child, C. M. 119 Colvin, S. S 33 *Conradi, Edward 91 Cooley, C. H. 24 Cutten, George B. 99 Dana, C. L. 99 Day, Leroy C. 84 Downey, June 33, 84 Freud, Sigmund 119 Galton, Francis 33, 59, 79 Gillette, J. M. — 33 Hale, Horatio 91 James, William 47, 99 Jordan, David Starr 79 Krohn, W. O. 79 Lalande, A. 106 Manaceine, Marie de 119 Martin, L. J. 24 Munroe, James P. 24 Parish, Edmund 48 Patrick, G. T. W. 59 Phillips, D. E. 59 Pierce, A. H. 84 Ribot, Theodule 99 Rose, K. B. 84 Sidis, Boris 48 Stratton, George M. 59 Tracy, F. 91 Whipple, G. M. 84 Whiting, Margaret C. 84 Deacidified using the Bookkeeper process. Neutralizing agent: Magnesium Oxide Treatment Date: Nov. 2004 PreservationTechnologies A WORLD LEADER IN PAPER PRESERVATION 1 1 1 Thomson Park Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066 (724)779-2111