mmmf^m^m^^ ^vvv^V-VVVV^ '^"^«:-^"^w-;-;S"' CfWtf^fb^t/'; WWHWVuu^SSt^, i,^^^^^ illi V^M^AOMm W' ! ^■,-WwWu^^uwWu^^ E /^\^y^^ ^LIBRARY OF CONGRESS.? f I i....5\ ^ UNITED STATES OP AMERICA. fiP ,vv'^M^!^v^C;_vvwyji. '^i^^^^^vW^wW^^'Uv .J - ■ V-' V V ' imm ;;^0v\^ ' wiifnmmmmn^^k ^W^^^|^y^''';<^Vf|| 'WQ^^§( :^Piii^^%^^^^^ ■^^MSU^^AMjuuim^M ™ lateiss ......... r..._..^^^^^ wmi^ M0m0m^'^^^^ "'W -=•■- " _ ' ""» « VWH^ 'jMMj\ THE' HIGHEST USE OF LEARNING: AN ADDRESS DELIVERED AT HIS INAUGURATION TO THE PRESIDENCY ^^ AMHERST COLLEGE BY REV. EDWARD HITCHCOCK, LL. D. PUBLISHED BY THE TRUSTEES. «^ AMHERST: J. S. & C. ADAMS, PRINTERS, 1845. -4-y^- . S 1 ii^ INAUGUEAL ADDRESS. The cause of education, in this country at least, is almost universally popular. Yet were we to pass around the inquiry among the different classes of society, why they regard it so important, we should probably receive very different answers. One man, himself uneducated, places its chief value in the means it affords of defence against the impositions of the de- signing and unprincipled. Another values it chiefly because it enables him to take advantage of the ignorance of the world in promoting his schemes of self-aggrandizement. A third looks upon the means which education affords for acquiring property, as its highest use. A fourth regards the personal reputation, respect, and influence, which learning bestows, as its chief ad- vantage. A fifth thinks of it mainly as an instrument of ad- vancing civilization, and multiplying the comforts and luxuries of life. A sixth estimates most highly its influence in elevating the lower classes of the community above the condition of mere animals and drudges, and in making them understand that the body is not the only part of man to be cared for. A seventh places the highest use of learning in its power of disciplining and liberalizing the mind, and delivering it from vulgar fears, superstitions, and prejudices ; and in giving to men just views of their rights, relations, and destinies. An eighth thinks most of the boundless fields of enjoyment which knowledge opens to the human mind, of a far more noble and refined kind than any dependent upon animal nature. A ninth makes its most import- ant use to consist in its bearings upon religion, both natural and revealed. Now in my opinion, this ninth man has the right of the mat- ter most decidedly ; and yet, I fear that his opinion is not the most common, or the most popular. But to my conviction, the religious applications of learning are by far its most important use : and the occasion seems to be a fit one to defend and il- lustrate this opinion. It needs, I believe, both defence and il- lustration. For though the belief is general that religion may derive some benefit from particular branches of learning, there is still an impression lingering on many minds, that some sciences are unfriendly in their bearings upon religion ; and that others have no relations to religion. Much less is it generally believed that the strongest reason why we should sustain common schools, Academies, and Colleges, is, that we are thus promot- ing the cause of true religion. But if this be indeed true, then, when we give our property, our influence, or ourselves, to the cause of learning, we shall do it with a heartier good will and a more entire consecration ; and we shall the more cheerfully bear up under the trials, fatigues, disappointments, and per- plexities, that lie in our path. I would not, indeed, undervalue the secular advantages of learning. They are so obvious and so important, that I could not do it if I would. Those whose experience reaches back fifty, or forty, or even thirty years, have evidence in their own consciousness of the economical value of learning, too strong to be overcome by any speculative argument depreciating its impor- tance. When we compare the present condition of the worId,and our own condition, with what they were in our early days, — we cannot but be deeply impressed with the rapid progress of socie- ty, and the multiplication of secular advantages, and the means of comfort and happiness, growing out of the advancement of learning. Branches of science and literature, which, at the be- ginning of this century, were tabooed to all who were not resi- dents within the walls of Universities and Colleges, and even some branches that scarcely had an existence then, are now the theme of famihar conversation in the workshop, on the farm, in the stage-coach, the rail car, the steamboat, and the pack- et. And so simplified are the elementary principles of many of these branches, as to be brought within the comprehension of the child at the primary school. Instead of the stinted sources of information then possessed, in a few small newspapers and periodicals in some of the larger cities, and a few republica- tions of small European works, the country is now flooded with newspapers of all sizes below one that will swallow up an octa- vo, and with periodicals and books to suit all tastes, and all purs- es, and all fancies, from the penny pamphlet up to the seven hundred dollar volume of Audubon. Still more striking has been the progress of the useful arts from the application of scientific principles. In Great Britain, at this moment, steam performs a work that would require the unaided labor of more than four hundred millions of men ; and a work as great probably in proportion to the population, in our own country. Improvements in machinery and in chemical processes have doubtless within this century made a still greater deduction from the amount of labor necessary ; and these im- provements reach every class of the community ; pointing out to them an easier path to competence, and affording them lei- sure to cultivate their intellectual and moral powers. Then too, how striking the change in respect to intercommunication, both on land and water. We now hardly give a serious parting to our friend who starts upon a trip of only some five hundred or a thousand miles, so soon shall we see him again. And even when v/e have bid him adieu, as he starts on foreign travel, we hardly begin to reckon his absence by months, certainly not as formerly by years, ere he greets us again ; having made the tour of Europe, or perhaps stood within the Holy City, or coast- ed the shores of the Black Sea and the Caspian, or gone down the Red Sea to India and the Celestial Empire, and returning by the Isthmus of Panama, has completed the circuit of the globe. And besides the problem has just been solved, of carry- ing on a conversation and transacting business with our friend when absent, even though hundreds, and it may be thousands «r,non^^ Then and not till then, will it be seen how noble an auxiliary to virtue and religion is the poetic element in man. There is another department of polite literature that has been, still more than poetry, monopolized by vice and irreligion ; and which, I fear, will be still harder to reclaim. To minds averse to close thinking ; to those whose tastes and habits are all artifi- cial, and who have never acquired a relish for the beauties and wonders of nature ; as well as to those who are the slaves of ap- petite and passion ; the novel and the romance have ever pos- sessed irresistible attractions. And since, these three classes 12 form, to a greater or less extent, the principal part of society, this is the literature that is most widely and abundantly diffused. And while the demand has created a supply, so, according to a principle of political economy, a surplus supply has increased the demand. The pen and the press have been prolific beyond all precedent ; and the quality, of the article has varied according to the demands of fashion. At one time the gross and disgust- ing descriptions of Fielding and Smollett met the popular taste. Anon, what Hannah More calls the "non-morality" of the Great Unknown, was in excellent ^om/. And since that prolific fountain has been dried up, others, who, alas for the cause of virtue and religion, are too well known, have not failed to disgorge tales of all sorts, suited to every variety of appetite, from the most deli- cate and refined to the most gross and grovelling. For like the frogs of Egypt, these productions have not been confined to the loudoirs of the literati, nor to the centre tables and withdrawing rooms of wealth and fashion : but have found their way to the kneeding troughs of the kitchen ; coming there, it may be, in one of those enormous products of the modern press, that might be mistaken for a winding sheet ; and which I fear has proved the winding sheet of many a noble intellect. I am aware that not a few authors, disgusted with these per- versions of ficticious literature, have made many praise-worthy efforts lo turn its current into the channels of virtue and relig- ion. Nor have they failed to obtain many interested readers. But I fear that in most cases it is the well arranged story, and not its moral, which has awakened interest : " First raising a combustion of desire, With some cold moral they would queach the fire." But Leviathan is not so tamed. Yet the fact that the love of novelty is so strong naturally in the heart, shows us, that in some way or other, it was meant to be gratified. And when we learn that the wonders of nature far transcend the wonders of romance, is it not evident, that if men can be brought to love nature, and those branches of knowledge which unlock her Elysian fields, this desire can be fully satisfied with reaUties, without the aid of fiction. I have Uttle hope that any success- 13 ful headway can be made against that morbid love of fiction, which has become the almost universal passion, until you can implant in man's heart a love of unsophisticated nature. This once done, and the fascinations of romance would become pow- erless under the overmastering influence of the new affection. To restore nature, therefore, to the throne of the heart, and ex- pel the meretricious usurper, is the noble work that lies be- fore the scholar of the nineteenth century. And when it shall be accomplished, as I doubt not it will be, and the deluge of fic- titious literature, that now almost buries the civilized world, shall have passed into the limbo of forgetful ness, it will be found that a mighty barrier to the progress of true knowledge and true religion has been taken out of the way, and that the heart which is alive to natures beauties, is vvell prepared to love the God of nature, as well as the God of revelation. It is not necessary to spend time in showing that rhetoric and oratory, two other important branches of polite literature, are capable of the same perversion to unworthy purposes, as the subjects already noticed. In every human heart there are chords, which, when struck by the silver bow of the rhetorician, or the magic wand of the orator, cannot but vibrate and give back a response. But when stormy passion, or reckless irreligion, sweeps over those chords, they return only discordant sounds, that grate harshly upon the ear of virtue and piety. But when they are touched by the delicate and skillful hands of true be- nevolence, the tones which they return, resemble the music of heaven ; and they excite the spirit of heaven all around. To promote that spirit is doubtless the grand object to which the Creator intended the flowers of rhetoric and the strains of elo- quence should be devoted. How immensely important, then, that Christian scholars should rescue these branches from the hands of the unprincipled and the wicked, and convert them to their legitimate use, as auxiliaries of virtue and religion ! Some worthy men, I know, look with a jealous eye upon the use of rhetorical and oratorical skill in aid of religion. Thev feel as if no attempt should be made to set off" and recommend the naked truth. But as remarked by Dr. Campbell, how much better for the minister of the Gospel to write so as to make tho 14 critic turn Christian, than to write so as to make the Christian turn critic ! How much deeper the effect, for example, upon every mind, could the advocate of religion in his descriptions, follow the rule so beautifully illustrated by Pope : " True ease in writing eomes from art, not chance; As those move easiest who have learnt to dance. 'Tis not enough no harshness gives offence; The sound must seem an echo to the sense. Soft is the strain when Zephj-r gently Mows, And the smooth stream in smootlier numbers flows ; But when loud surges lash the sounding shore. The hoarse rouyh verse should like the torrent roar. When Ajax strives some rock's vast weight to throw, The line too labors and the words move slow. Not so when swift Camilla scours the plain. Flies o'er the unbending corn and skims along the main." What student has not felt the thrilling influence of the no).v(p}.oia^oio 6ixXaaar,g of Homcr ? Or Still morc to my purpose, how striking the contrast between the opening of the gates of Heaven and of Hell, as described by Milton : " Heaven opened wide her ever during gates, On golden hinges turning: The infernal gates Wide open flew, on iron hinges turning. Grating harsh thunder." Now it is not in human nature to avoid receiving a powerful impression from such a skillful choice and collocation of words : and why should not religion avail itself of this means of giving truth a keener edge ? It may, indeed, be carried to excess ; as Dante seems to have done in his descriptions of the physical tor- ments of perdition : but Milton, while he has given an awful distinctness and force to those same torments, has not exagge- rated them : and why may not religion use this power, as any other proper means, to impress Divine truth ? In this respect, thus far, the children of this world have been wiser than the children of light. In passing from literature to science, on the great circle of human knowledge, we meet with intellectual and moral philoso- phy. But so obvious is the connection between the latter and the principles of religion, that we need not delay upon its eluci- dation. For every theory of morals, that is not radically defec- 15 tive, makes the origin of moral obligation identical with that of religious obligation. So that in fact, moral philosophy is only one branch of natural theology. I regard politics, also, or the prin- ciples by which nations should be governed and regulated, as only a branch of ethics ; or, rather as a special application of the principles of morality and religion : though I greatly fear, that expediency and self interest have thus far been the basis of political action more frequently than moral or religious princi- ple. By some writers, intellectual philosophy, or psychology, or metaphysics, as they would rather choose to denominate the science, has been supposed, upon the whole, quite disastrous to religion. For when they consult ecclesiastical history, they find that the most fatal errors in religion have usually been based upon some false system of metaphysics ; and that behind its hy- pothetical and unintelligible dogmas, the ablest sceptics have en- trenched themselves. They regard " the modern philosophy of the human mind, for the most part, as a mere system of abstrac- tions," "having almost nothing to offer of practical instruction ;" and although " the philosophy of the agency of sentient and voluntary beings is a matter of rational curiosity, — it is nothing more." I quote here, for the most part, the language of an able recent author. But admitting the truth of these statements, they show one thing at least ; that unless theologians are familiar with the systems of mental philosophy, so ably defended by eminent men, how can they hope to expose and refute such men when they employ metaphysical subtleties to pervert religious truth ? If the theologist does not display equal acuteness with the ontologist, the latter will triumph in his assaults upon religion. And if it be a false metaphysical philosophy, that has led a man to adopt a false religious creed, how important that the advocate of religion should be able to meet the errorist on his own ground, and not only to show him that he started wrong, but to put him upon the right track. " If it be a murky or misty region," says a late writer, " carry the blazing torch of demonstrated truth in- to every cloudy cave and den, encompass every fastness where error lurks, and pour in the fire of a burning logic. The surest way to get protection from the open, and especially the secret 16 ravages of a mischievous beast, is to hunt him down in his own lair."* But it is said, that all experience shows that there is no safety save in keeping religion entirely aloof from metaphysics. What centuries of disaster followed the attempt of the ancient fathers to incorporate the metaphysics of Platonism with Christianity ? And how much longer in the dark ages, did the pall of igno- rance and a perverted Christianity rest upon the world, because it was held down by the Peripatetic Philosophy, resting on it like an incubus ! In our own day, too, we have seen a glacial period commence, in a portion of the Church, from the freezing influence of German metaphysics ; which threatens to be as long and as rigid as the analogous geological period. Now were the question, whether it were better for men to re- ceive with child-like confidence the declarations of the Bible, without reference to ontological systems, all probably would re- ply in the affimative. But the difficulty is, that ingenious and speculative men will construct their philosophical strait jackets, into which they will force the doctrines of revelation. And when the friends of piety see that religion is panting and almost strangled by this cramping Procrustean process, how shall they liberate her ? They must have help to do it ; and denunciation and mere zeal will not bring help. They must show by a care- ful examination and measurement of the entire warp, and woof, and cut, of this philosophical dress, that however agreeable it may be to the latest fashion, it cramps the heart and the vitals, stops the circulation of the blood, and is shrivelling up the ex- tremities ; and then will all the friends of religion join in strip- ping ofT the murderous vestment. Do you suppose that the errors of Platonism, and the peripatetic philosophy would ever have been weeded out from Christian doctrines, except by men who had so thoroughly examined them as to be in no danger of pluck- ing up the truth also ? Who but metaphysicians could have ex- orcised that famous Plastic Nature, conjured from the " vasty deep," by so powerful a necromancer as Cudworth ? Who but men versed in the subtleties of dreamy abstractions, could have coped successfully with the Scottish prince of sceptics, when he had gathered a dense fog around him, and under cover of it had • Prof. Fiakfl'» Address at East Windsor, p. 8. 17 assailed the first principles of all religion ? Had Kant been un- skilled in the abtruse speculations of mental philosophy, he could not so effectually have demolished the pantheism of Spi- noza ; and still more essential is such knowledge to show the fallacy of those more recent forms of the same doctrine, the natural pantheism of Schelling, and the idealism of Fichte. Another effort of the German mind is to show that the argu- ment from design, to prove the Divine Existence, as advanced by Derham, Ray, Paley, and the Bridgewater Treatises, is false ; and that the idea of God is derived from a sort of intuition of the pure reason ; nor could the external world possibly excite the idea of God. These opinions have gained not a little cre- dence in this country ; falling in, as they do, with what is called a spiritual philosophy, or transcendentalism. Now that there is a moral order in the world, and in the mind itself, and that the understanding, perceiving this, naturally infers that a Being of Infinite Moral Perfections must be the author of both, — because we instinctively refer every effect to a cause, — cannot be doubt- ed. But on this view, this moral argument, as it is called, be- comes only a single example of the argument from design ; and by no means invalidates or supersedes other forms of the argu- ment derived from the external world. Dr. Paley's argument was, indeed, defective ; because he did not refer to mental philosophy to prove the spirituality of the Deity : But that de- fect is abundantly supplied by Chalmers, Crombie, and Brough- am : so that now, the argument which Paley labored to estab- lish, is impregnable ; But it will require the vigorous efforts of men versed in abtruse metaphysics, to bring it out of the fog and dust with which it has been enveloped. I have alluded to transcendentalism, dignified as it has been by the name of " spiritual philosophy," in distinction from the Baconian of inductive, which is called '•' sensuous." This is, also, a product of German metaphysics ; and when one sees what an absolutely unintelligible jargon is used in its enuncia- tion, by its ablest originators, such as Fitchte, Schelling, and Hegel, he finds it difficult to conceive how it has exerted such an influence upon religion. But the fact is, there is always to some minds, especially in youth, a wonderful charm in a philoso- IS phy that is esoteric. They love to behave themselves capable of discovering a hidden meaning in facts and principles, which the uninitiated cannot discover. Hence, let some man of real talents and learning, as Swedenborg for instance, solemnly and pertinaciously declare that he does "see what is not to be seen," and he will not want followers, who soon come to have a clear vision for double senses and spiritual meanings. Indeed, a man of talents has only to be obscure in his style an(f meaning, in order to be regarded by a large proportion of the world, and among them not a few recently fledged literati, as very profound. On the contrary, that beautiful simplicity and clearness of style and thought, which are the result of long and patient thoug'ht, and which characterize the highest order of talent, are regarded by the same class as evidence of a superficial mind and destitution of genius. Accordingly, the temptation is very strong with writ- ers and public speakers, who vi'ould be popular, to wrap them- selves in the mantle of mystery and obscurity ; so that the re- mark of Dr. Griffin is too true, that the last attainment of the orator is simplicity : and we may say the same, also, in respect to the philosopher. But if men of talents will mount in the air balloon of metaphysical speculation, into transcendental re- gions of clouds and nebulae, and through their speaking trumpets announce the discovery of new worlds, unknown to the Bible or to science ; Christian men must ascend after them, in a sim- ilar vehicle, bearing with them the torch of truth, to ascertain whether a fog bank has not been mistaken for a planet. I have thus far spoken of the value of mental science as a necessary means of detecting religious errors, originating in the same science. But it has also many direct and important bear- ings upon religious truth. But did the time permit me to point them out, it would be little more than a repetition of what has been recently said better and more fully than I can do, by one of my colleagues.* I pass, therefore, to another important sign in the great zodiac of human knowledge. On that circle math- ematics follows naturally after metaphysics, because it furnishes us with the noblest examples of abstract truth in the universe. But I fancy that I hear one and another whispering, " what possible connection can there be between mathematics and re- * Prof. Fiske's Address at East Windsor. 19 llgion ?" The pure abstractions of this science do not, indeed, lead the mind directly to a Deity ; since they may be conceived to be necessary and eternal truths. Tliey are not the result of an induction from facts, but of a comparison of ideas. And it is the facts of the -natural world that most strikingly discover to us the wonders of adaptation and design, and lead the mind ir- resistibly to infer a Supreme Being. But what is the basis on which most of this adaptation and design rest ? Chiefly, I answer, the laws of mathematics. Look up to the heavens, and you will find those laws controlling all the movements of suns and planets with infallible precision. Every movement on earth, also, which is either mechanical or chemical, is equally de- pendent upon mathematical laws. Vital operations, too, so far as they result from chemical and mechanical forces, must be referred to the same principles. I do not assert that life and intellect are governed by mathematical laws : but their opera- tions have all the precision of mathematics ; and I doubt ^ not could be predicted by angelic minds, certainly by the Deity, with as much certainty as the astronomer foretells an eclipse, or transit : and really I do not see but the same principles would guide the calculation in the one case as in the other. In short, so entirely dependent are the movements of the universe upon mathematical laws, that to alter or annul these laws, would be to restore the reign of chaos and old night. Let but a single axiom or corollary of mathematics be changed, and I doubt not that wild disorder and ruin would soon take the place of the adaptation and beautiful design that now meet us at every step. Mathematics then forms the very framework of nature's harmonies, and is essential to the argument for a God. Instead •of having no connection with religion, it lies at the foundation of all theism. It seems to me, also, that mathematics aids us in the concep- tion of some religious truths, difficult from their nature to be conceived of by finite minds. All the attributes of the Deity, being infinite, are of this description. But the contemplation of an endless series in mathematics, gives us the nearest approach to an idea of the infinite, which we can attain. Follow the se- ries, indeed, as far as our powers will carry us, and we are still 20 no nearer the end than when we started. But we have got hold of the thread, that would conduct us, if our Daedalian wings did not fail us, across that interminable abyss which sepa- rates the finite from the infinite ; and when we transfer our mathematical conceptions to the Deity, we can hardly fail to meditate upon his glories with deeper amazement. To many minds all explanations of the biblical doctrine of the Trinity, appear so absurd and contradictory as not to ad- mit of belief. Let, it however, be stated to such a man, for the first time, that two lines may approach each other forever with- out meeting, and it will appear to him as absurd as the doc- trine of the Trinity. But after you have demonstrated to him the properties of the hyperbola and its asymptote, the apparent absurdity vanishes. And so after the theologian has stated, that by Divine Unity he means only a numerical unity, — in other words, that there is but one Supreme Being, and that the Three Persons of the Godhead are one in this sense, and three only in those respects not inconsistent with this unity, every philosophical mind, whether it admit or not that the Scriptures teach the doctrine of the Trinity, must see that there is no ab- surdity or contradiction in this view of it. Hence it may hap- pen, and indeed it has happened, that the solution of a man's difficulties on this subject may originate in a proposition of Conic Sections. Other peculiar truths of revelation receive striking support from the application of mathematical principles. Among these is the doctrine of special or miraculous Providence. Professor Babbage, in that singular yet ingenious work, called the Ninth Bridgwater Treatise, has shown mathematically, that mira- cles may have formed a part of the original and foreordained plan of the universe, and that their occurrence may be as really the result of natural laws as ordinary events, a doctrine, which, indeed, had been previously advanced by Butler. And in this way is the famous objection of David Hume to miracles proved by mathematics to be groundless. Other religious applications of mathematics might be pointed out. But we must hasten forward to that wide space on the circle of human knowledge, occupied by the inductive sciences. 21 These comprehend, in fact, all those branches that relate to the material universe, and when we have glanced at them, we shall have completed the circuit of literature and science. And here at the outset, we remark, that from these sciences have been gathered that great mass of facts which constitute the essence of Natural Theology, by such men as Newintyt, Ray, Derham, Wollaston, Paley, Brown, and the authors of the Bridgewater Treatises. The a 'posteriori argument for the Divine existence rests upon them ; and, indeed, almost all the truths pertaining to the character of the Deity and his govern- ment that nature discloses. They are arguments which all men can readily understand and appreciate : for although a few metaphysical minds have endeavored to throw doubt over the vahdity of the argument from design, as I have already stated ; yet this is in fact the only evidence that does interest and satis- fy the great mass of men. When they see such wonderful ef- fects as physical science discloses, they are led irresistibly, by a universal law of the human mind, to refer them to some ade- quate cause ; and no cause can be adequate, save an Infinite Deity. Natural Theology has selected only the most striking of these effects. But in truth every fact of inductive science furnishes an argument for theism. So that to a man in a mor- ally healthy state, every scientific truth becomes a religious truth, and nature is converted into one great temple, where sacred fire is always burning upon the altars, where hovers the glorious Shekinah, and where, from a full orchestra, the an- tiiem of praise is ever ascending. In accordance with this view, we find that the most gifted minds, and indeed a large majority of all minds, that have de- voted themselves to inductive science, have been the friends of religion. And here we reckon the princes of the intellectual world, such as Newton, Kepler, Galileo, Pascal, Boyle, Coper- nicus, Linnaeus, Black, Boerhaave and Dalton : and among the living, such men as Herschel, Brewster, Whewell, Sedgwick, Owen, and a multitude of others. The very same argumenta- tion that leads such original discoverers to derive the principles of science from facts in nature, carries them irresistibly back- ward to a First Cause : and, indeed, the inductive principle, as 22 developed by Bacon, forms the true basis on wliich to build the whole fabric of natural religion ; and he who fully admits the truth of natural religion, is in a state of preparation for receiv- ing revealed truth, to supply its deficiences. So that upon the whole, the inductive sciences are of all others most favorable to religion, and the most intimately connected with it. I shall doubtless be met here by the objection, that not a few distinguished men, found in the ranks of inductive science, have been thorough sceptics. And here the names of some of the most able mathematicians of modern times, such as La Place, and D'Alembert, will be adduced. We shall be referred to the Nebular Hypothesis of the former, and to the Encyclopedia of the latter; both of them intended to lay the axe at the root of all rehgion, and to cover nature with the pall of atheism. But such anomalies as these are explicable in consistency with the general position that inductive science is eminently favorable to religion. For in the first place, these men were atheists in spite of science, rather than through its influence. The spirit of the limes, and of the country in which they lived, was dissolute and atheistic ; and the moral feelings of D'Alembert at least, were so corrupt that nothing but atheism could keep conscience quiet. In the second place, they were distinguished in abstruse mathematics, rather than iii inductive science : and it cannot be denied, that when men devote themselves almost exclusively to abstractions of this nature, they are apt to look with suspicion up- on the less certain, but far higher and more important evidence of moral reasoning : or rather, they attempt to apply the subtleties of the higher mathematics to religion, and of course fail of ar- riving at correct results : because the subjects are totally diverse, and must be understood by entirely different modes of analsyis. Bonaparte, who was quick to discover character, made La Place one of his ministers : but soon saw that he did not discharge his duties with much ability; because as the emperor said, " he sought subtleties in every subject, and carried into his official employments the spirit of the method of infinitely small quanti- ties," employed by mathematicians. But the grand difficulty with such men is, that by confining their attention so exclusively to one department of knowledge, and to the cultivation of one 23 set of faculties, by a well known law of physiology they dwarf all the other powers, and really become less capable of judging of other subjects than ordinary men, who cultivate all their fac- ulties in due proportion. This is strikingly exhibited in the Nebular Hypothesis of La Place. He really thought that it ren- dered a Deity unnecessary in the formation of the universe. But the merest tyro in moral reasoning sees, that even ad- mitting the hypothesis, a designing, infinitely wise, and pow- erful Deity, is just as necessary as without it. It only throws farther back the period when this designing and creative interposition was exerted : and even the Christian philosopher feels no difficulty in adopting this hypothesis, through fear of its irreligious tendency. The fact is, that La Place, though a giant in mathematics, was only a liliput on other subjects. It ought not to be forgotten, also, that neither of the eminent infidel mathematicians, whom I have named, were original discoverers, like Newton, Copernicus, and Boyle. In making their discov- eries, these latter men were led to take broad views of science, and to examine the original as well as final causes of events : whereas such men as La Place and D'Alembert, only carried out and illustrated the principles discovered by others. In tracing out these illustrations, they did, indeed, discover amaz- ing acuteness: but their views were so much confined, that they were but poor judges of the relations of science to religion. They were excellent mathematicians, but poor philosophers. For in the noble language of Sir John Herschel, one of the brightest living ornaments of inductive science in Europe, " the character of the true philosopher is, to hope all things not im- possible, and to believe all things not unreasonable." But the character of these men would be better described by saying, that they doubted and denied every thing that could not be proved by mathematics. They ar^ examples of malformation and distortion in the philosophical world, instead of fair propor- tion and full developement. There is another circumstance which has deepened the im- pression that the inductive sciences are, to some extent, unfavor- able to rehgion. Scarcely any important discovery has been made in these branches, that has not been regarded for a time, 24 either by the timid and jealous friends of rehgion, or by its su- perficial enemies, to be opposed at least to revelation, if not to theism. When Copernicus demonstrated the diurnal and an- nual revolutions of the earth, the infidel saw clearly that the facts vi^ere in opposition to the Bible ; and the theologian was of the same opinion, and arrayed scripture authority, as well as compact syllogisms, against the new astronomy. But the Christian soon learnt that he had misunderstood the language of the Bible, because he had read it through the medium of a false astronomy. So too, when the Brahminical astronomy was first brought to light, and the epoch of the Tirvalore tables was thought to be nearly as early as the Mosaic date of*man's crea- tion, scepticism began to exult. But the tone changed when it was ascertained that this epoch was supposititious. More re- cently, French infidelity saw in the Zodiac of Denderah a refu- tation of the biblical chronology. But when it was ascertained that the position of the signs on that Zodiac, in respect to the colures, had reference to the commencement of the Egyptian civil year, and not to the precession of the equinoxes, this fan- cied discrepancy also vanished : and now, when both biblical interpretation and astronomy are better understood, every one confesses, not only that the science is in harmony with revela- tion, but that it aflfords some of the most splendid illustrations of religion to be found in the whole circle of learning. When at the beginning of the present century, the great dis- covery was announced, that the principal part of the solid ma- terials of the earth had been oxidized, or in popular language, had been burnt, both the baptised and the unbaptised infidel at once declared, that the final destruction of the earth, as des- cribed by Peter, was impossible : since it is no longer combus- tible : and since the apostle had thus erred, because not ac- quainted with modern chemistry, the idea of his inspiration must be given up. It was erelong found, however, that the apostle's language had been misunderstood, through the influ- ence of the false opinion, still widely entertained, that to burn a substance is to destroy or annihilate it. But when chemistr|i showed that combustion only changes the form of substances, and cannot annihilate a particle, the apostle's meaning was i 25 found perfectly to correspond to such an idea : and it is now obvious, that he meant to teach simply, that whatever upon or within the earth is combustible, will be burnt ; and the whole mass of the globe be melted. So that now the tables are com- pletely turned ; and we find, not only no contradiction between his language and chemistry, but a striking proof of its inspired origin, in the fact, that though written when chemistry was not known, it should be found in perfect harmony with the re- searches of that science. And the same remark may be ap- plied to the whole scriptures in their relation to all science. — The most eagle eyed sagacity of the nineteenth century has been unable to detect a single discrepancy between the two records. The same cannot be said of any false rehgion. The Shasters of Hindostan contain a false astronomy, as well as a false anatomy and physiology, and the Koran distinctly avows the Ptolemaic system of the heavenly bodies ; and so interwo- ven are these scientific errors with the religion of these sacred books, that when you have proved the former you have dis- proved the latter. But the Bible, stating only facts, and adopt- ing no system of human philosophy, has ever stood, and ever shall stand, in sublime simplicity and undecaying strength ; while the winds and the waves of conflicting human opinions, roar and dash harmlessly around, and the wrecks of a thou- sand false systems of philosophy and religion are strewed along its base. But the religious applications of chemistry do not consist simply in illustrating a passage of scripture. It abounds with the most beautiful exhibitions of the Divine wisdom and be- nevolence : and notwithstanding the ingenious developments by Prout, in his Bridgewater Treatise, and by Fownes in his Prize Essay, I must beUeve that this field is only just entered ; and ihat most precious gems will be found in almost every part of 'its wide extent. What admirable skill and benevolence does fthe doctrine of definite proportions and atomic constitution in chemical compounds present ! Here we see nature incessantly performing processes, on which organic life and comfort de- pend, with a practical mathematics as perfect as the theory. — And then, how wonderful is the isomeric constitution, recently 4 26 discovered, of those proximate principles that form the food of animals and plants. How beautiful too, the mode, — only re- cently ascertained, — by which this nourishment is brought with- in their reach, and introduced into their systems ! See too what wonderful benevolence as well as wisdom are displayed in the laws and operations of heat, by which its very excess in tropical regions, produces by evaporation the paradoxical result of cooling and rendering habitable that burning zone : and on the other hand, the congelation and condensation produced by its absence in frigid regions, renders the atmosphere warmer and the climate habitable. Think, also, how in the case of water, by an apparent exception to a law of nature, just as it enters into a state of congelation, the great bodies of that liquid in our riv- ers and lakes are prevented from freezing up in the winter, so that the longest summer would not thaw them out. And final- ly, what substance in nature is so wonderfully adapted to its manifold and seemingly opposite uses, as water ! Simpi'e though it seem. Emblem of imbecility itself, As most regard it, yet in fact, the fooif Of all organic life ; the fruitful scarce Of power in human arts ; and in the clouds, The storm, the mountain stream, the placid lake, The ocean's roaring and the glacier's sheen. The landscape's frostwork, or its icy gems, Hence springs the beautiful and the sublime. A power, indeed, pervading nature through ; Now moving noiseless through organic lubes, To keep stagnation from the vital frame ; And now the Atlantic dashing to the skies, Or rushing down Niagara's rocky steep, Earth trembling, staggering, underneath the shock ; Effects so diverse, opposite, to gain By one mild element, a problem this, No wisdom, short of infinite, could solve. No sciences have furnished so many and so appropriate facts, illustrative of natural theology, as anatomy and physiology. They have been the great magazine, whence writers on that subject have drawn their most effective weapons in their war with atheism : but being so fully described in so many treatises, I need not enter into particulars. Comparative anatomy and physiology, however, of more recent date, have not yet been so extensively employed for religious illustration as they will be : 27 although Bell's Bridgewater Treatise upon the hand, affords us a foretaste of what may be done. The developments of these sciences are truly marvellous. Who would hqve believed, for instance, fifty years ago, that such is the mathematical correla- tion, not only of different parts of an animal, but of parts of different animals, that from a single fragment of the bone of an unknown creature, the skillful anatomist can construct his whole skeleton, and then clothe it with muscles, blood vessels, and nerves, and point out its food, its habits, audits haunts. Yet this has been done in many instances ; and the subsequent discov- ery of the whole skeleton has confirmed the accuracy of the principle employed, and the results obtained. What a striking proof of the existence and agency of a Being infinitely wise and powerful, to contrive and create the universe ! For in fact, we find that the correlation of animal structures, so beau- tifully developed by Cuvier, Owen, and others, is but a specific example of the great law of harmony, that links together by a golden chain, the great and the small, the past, the present, and the future, throughout the universe. The science of physiology, however, lias often been looked upon with jealousy by the friends of religion, as leading its vo- taries to materialism. It would not be strange, indeed, if men, who see such astonishing effects result from exquisite material organization, and who give but little attention to the functions and laws of intellect, should come to think it possible that even thought may be only a result of that organization. But the difficulty Ties, not in the science, but in these partial views : in that common failing of literary men, to attempt to group ev- ery thing under a favorite science and explain every thing by it. And further, when I find even professedly Christian men de- fending materialism, and some of its ablest advocates ad- mitting that the soul may be something "immortal, sub- tle, immaterial, diffused through the brain,"* (I use their very words,) I cannot believe that the views of such men as to the nature of the soul, differ much in reality from those of the strict immaterialist ; although they use different terms. Nor will the practical influence of their opinions, false as they undoubtedly are, when understood in their strict sense, be like- * Elliotson's Physiology, p. 39. 33 ly to be very disastrous : although there is a grosser form of materialism, that is made the basis of a hateful system of athe- ism. There are two recent offsets from Physiology, which have been supposed fraught with influences unfavorable to religion. I refer to Phrenology and Mesmerism. The first has been thought to favor materialism, and to lessen human responsibility ; and the latter, to bring miracles into disrepute ; and to direct us for the cure of the body and the soul, to a class of dreaming pretend- ers, whose responses are about as much to be relied on as those of the oracle of Delphos, the god of Ekron, or the witch of Endor ; and whom it is about as impious to consult. The mer- its of these new branches of science, this is not the proper oc- casion to discuss ; nor is it easy as yet to ascertain definitely what principles in them are settled. But admitting their pre- tensions, the first seems to leave the question of materialism just where it found it ; since it is as easy to see how an immaterial soul should act through a hundred organs as through one. Nor does it seem to me more difficult, on natural principles, to see how the mind may act at a distance, through the undulations of a mesmeric msdium, than to see how light and heat are transmitted by the waves of a luminiferous ether. On the other hand, if physiology and phrenology tend to materialism, certain- ly mesmerism tends even more decidedly to immaterialism ; as the conversion of several distinguished materialists will testify. It does, also, open to the Christian, (admitting its statements to be true,) most interesting glimpses of the mode in which the mind may act when freed from flesh and blood, and clothed with a spiritual body. Indeed, I doubt not, that in regard both to Phrenology and Mesmerism, the general principle will prove true, that the more ominous of evil any branch of knowledge seems to be, in its incipient state, the more prolific it will ulti- mately become, in illustrations favorable both to morality and religion. The wide dominions of natural history, embracing zoology, botany, and mineralogy, the theologist has ever found crowded with demonstrations of the Divine Existence and of God's Prov- idential care and government ; and every new province that has 29 been explored by the naturalist, only serves to enlarge our con- ceptions of the Creator's works, and to impress us more deeply with their unity and perfection. These new conquests in un- known regions havQ been astonishingly numerous within the last half century: but in the direction pointed out by the mic- roscope, they have been most marvellous: The existence of animals too minute to be seen by the naked eye, has, indeed, long been known : but it was not till the researches of Ehren- berg, that any just conceptions of their infinite number and indefinite minuteness were entertained. We now know, that nine milhons of some of these animalcula, may live in a space not larger than a mustard seed ; and that their numbers are many million times greater than that of all other animals on the globe. Indeed, the microscope has laid open a field into the infinitessimal forms of organic and inorganic nature, quite as boundlesss, both in number and extent, as the telescope discloses in infinite space. Nor can we find any limits in the one direction more than the other : and thus does the micros- cope in the same manner as the telescope, prodigiously enlarge our conceptions of the perfections of the Infinite Author of the Universe. These researches have cast not a little light upon a certain hypothesis, that has been, in one form or another, often thrown before the world, since the days of Democritus and Epicurus, usually for the purpose of sustaining a system of atheism. It supposes an inherent power in nature, capable of producing plants and animals without parentage, by an imagined vital force, essential to some forms of matter. The ancient philoso- phers imputed these effects to a " fortuitous concourse of at- oms." In modern times this general statement has been made more definite by Lamarck, Geoffroy, St. Hilaire, Bory St. Vin- cent, and others, who suppose that Nature, — in their vocabula- ry sometimes dignified by the title of Deity, but still unintelli- gent and merely instrumental, — gives origin only to " monads," or " rough draughts" of organic beings ; and that these, by " an inherent tendency to improvement," and " the force of ex- ternal circumstances," become animals of higher and higher or- ganization ; until at last the orang-outang abandoned his quad- 30 rupedal condition, and stood erect as man, with all his lofty powers of intellect. Before the invention of the microscope, a multitude of insects and worms were thought to have this equivocal origin, and to pass through these transmutations ; an example of which, every Latin scholar will recollect, in the di- rections of Virgil for the production of a swarm of bees out of the carcass of an animal. But as optical instruments have been improved, and observations have become more acute, the origin of nearly every animal visible to the naked eye, has been found to be by ordinary generation. The advocates of the spontane- ous production of organic beings, however, still clung to the animalcula and the entozoa. But it is now clearly demonstra- ted, that all the former class have been derived from parents ; and that more abundant means are provided for their repro- duction than for any of the higher tribes of animals. The same is true of the entozoa : a single individual of which, is capable of producing more than sixty millions of progeny ; and it would be very strange for nature to take such extraordinary pains for their propagation, if it might have been accomplished spontane- ously. Not a single certain example, indeed, of the spontane- ous production of living beings can be adduced : and if there are a few cases where parentage has not been yet discovered, the past history of the subject makes it almost certain, that it needs only more perfect instruments, or more extended obser- vations, to prove that the same great law of reproduction em- braces all animated nature. And as to the transmutation of species, geology has shown that it has never taken place ; while physiology demonstrates that species are permanent and can never be transmuted. The individual does, indeed, pass through different stages of development ; some of which resemble the perfect forms of species inferior to it in the organic scale. But the limits of these developments are fixed for each species ; nor is there a single known instance, in which an individual has been able to stop at any particular stage, and thus become another species. In view of these facts, it is not strange that most of the men best qualified to judge on such a subject, as for instance, Owen, the ablest of comparative anatomists ; Ehrenberg, the first of mic- 31 roscopists ; and Muller, most eminent in physiology, should reject these hypotheses of spontaneous generation and transmu- tation. Nevertheless, the unusual interest which has been man- ifested by the recent work of an English nobleman, entitled. Ves- tiges of the Natural History of the Creation, wherein these hypoth- esis, as well as the nebular hypotheses, are ingeniously defend- ed, and that too without denying the original intervention of a Divine Power in nature, show us that a long drawn contest is yet before naturalists on these subjects, ere these fancies shall be forced into that extramundane receptacle of things abortive and unaccomplished, described by Milton as " a limbo large and wide," on the back side of the moon. And yet, my conviction is, that this contest will not have so important a bearing on the cause of religion, as some theologists imagine. For even though these hypotheses should be established, an intelligent, spiritual, infinite Deity, is quite as necessary to account for existing na- ture, as on the more common theory, which supposes the uni- verse commanded from nothing at once in a perfect state. In- deed, to endow the particles of matter with the power to form exquisite organic compounds, just at the moment when circum- stances are best adapted to their existence, and then to become animated, nay, endowed with instincts, and with lofty intellects ; all which results the advocates of these hypotheses must impute to the laws impressed upon originally brute matter, — such ef- fects, I say, demand infinite wisdom, power and benevolence, even more imperatively than the common theories of creation. I doubt not that in general these hypotheses have been adopted to sustain atheistic opinions, or to remove the Deity away from his works. But unbiassed philosophy sees that they utterly fail to accomplish either of these objects. And I confess, that I re- ject them, more because they have no solid evidence in their fa- vor, than because I fear that they will ultimately be of much in- jury to religion ; especially so long as such works as Whewell's "Indications of the Creator," are within the reach of the scholar. The religious bearings of geology alone remain to be noticed. And no science, except perhaps astronomy, has excited so much alarm as this, for its supposed irreligious tendencies. But so g.«..., ?»^^w^^ '^^^%VV ^ ^^^^'^^ ^^U^a^'l/^f yS^i^W^' ;^Wt ■^■^v^\^\ ='^««^<.%^«<2b^sy«»gy««l^o; wuu> A;^ ^ ''xyV.- V> ,.feLW^>^V^^^ v^ VuvJw^uVl^u^v.- w^^^^^^^