■«* 4 **> $ 3. ^ . * ,^m*r * .\ .S\ N , O *> C . •** » * S A< X i^ ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES AND LEADERS IN THE REIGN OF QUEEN ANNE 1702-1710 BY WILLIAM THOMAS MORGAN, A.M., Ph.D. INSTRUCTOR IN HISTORY, COLUMBIA UNI^feRSITY THIS ESSAY WAS AWARDED THE HERBERT BAXTER ADAMS PRIZE BY THE AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION, 1919 NEW HAVEN: YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON: HUMPHREY MILFORD OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS MDCCCCXX .Mi COPYRIGHT, 1920, BY YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS APR 27 1920 'CI.A566732 TO THE MEMORY OF JOHN SINER MORGAN PREFACE The Age of Anne is one of the most interesting in Eng- lish history. It was a reign when political parties were in such a state of flux that politicians changed sides with little hesitation; when periodicals began to play a tran- scendent part in politics; when pamphleteering became the customary method of changing public opinion ; when literary men were usually politicians first of all; when ecclesiastical policies were determined by political exi- gencies, and church offices considered as a part of the civil service ; when monied men began to take a greater interest in elections and play a larger part in determining national policies ; when the cabinet was rapidly evolving into its present form; when the Protestant succession hung in the balance ; when Scotland joined her southern sister in a firm alliance ; when hatred of France became almost a religion; and when the United Kingdom gained the political and commercial hegemony of Europe that was lost by France at the treaty of Utrecht. Yet in spite of the interest and importance of this period it has been almost entirely neglected by serious historians for more than a generation. Nearly a half century ago Mahon and Wyon wrote their histories of the reign of Anne, and since that time no attempt has been made to deal with the history of the reign in the light of new materials that have recently become accessible. Even such industrious German scholars as Klopp, Salo- mon, and Von Noorden have done little to illuminate the domestic side of the first half of the reign, while the more recent of their works is nearly thirty years from the 8 PREFACE press. Lecky's excellent history deals most cavalierly with the first decade of the century, and is now more than forty years old. Burton's three volumes are sketchy and of little value save for Scottish affairs. The books of Paul, McCarthy, and Mrs. Howitt are pre-eminently popu- lar rather than critical. Trevelyan's account of the reign is surprisingly brief, while the nature of Leadam's scholarly volume precludes any extensive treatment of new materials. In a reign where the personal element is so important, it is indeed noteworthy that we have so few biographies of the statesmen of the time, and those few far from satisfactory. Even Queen Anne has found no real biog- rapher. With all its limitations, and with its confessedly Jacobite tinge, Miss Strickland's work is probably the best we have, although it was published more than seventy years ago. Such books as P. F. W. Ryan's Queen Anne and her Court are distinctly uncritical. The Duchess of Marlborough has found many apologists and critics, but no biography at once critical and interpretative has been written, despite the efforts of Mrs. Thomson, Mrs. Col- ville, Molloy, and Reid. The best life of Marlborough is by Coxe, and is now a century old. Roscoe in his life of Harley lacks a proper appreciation of the man, although he has made some use of the valuable Harley Papers. Yet his is the only attempt to tell the life story of one of the most astute politicians of that day. Scholars have been more assiduous in their attention to Bolingbroke, although scarcely more successful. Macknight's book (1863) remains the best, as Sichel in his more recent vol- umes has failed to make the most of his opportunities. Grodolphin's life by Eliott (1888) is far from satisfying, as the author confessed that much source material was inaccessible to him. Shrewsbury and Somerset, the politi- cal enigmas of the epoch, remain still unexplained. Not PREFACE 9 a single member of the Whig junto has found a worthy biographer and, until such time as the political activities of these five men are investigated, no adequate political history of the period can be written. For the most part, the older histories of this period have been written largely from the pages of Boyer, Burnet, and the Parliamentary History, with occasional references to available manuscript material. In this monograph additional manuscripts and source materials have been studied in the archives in England and Hol- land, besides numerous pamphlets and periodicals, and the invaluable reports of the Historical Manuscripts Commission. In a sense this is an attempt to rewrite the history of the first eight years of Anne's reign in the light of the new evidence that has become available in the last thirty years. In places the author has dared to differ from the usual estimates of some of the leading characters of the period. This has necessitated a frequent citation of authorities, for which he craves the reader's indulgence. The controversial nature of a part of his work has also caused him to quote more freely from contemporary sources than would otherwise have been the case. My acknowledgements should be many. The library authorities at Harvard, Yale, and Columbia Universities have always been more than kind in putting their treas- ures at my disposal. My thanks are also due to the offi- cials of the British Museum, the Bodleian, and the Rijks Archief for their kindness and consideration. In common with most American students who carry on research in England, I owe far more to the courtesy of Mr. Hubert Hall of the Public Record Office than I can ever repay. I am greatly indebted to Professor W. P. Trent of Columbia University. He has read the most of my manu- script, and has placed his intimate knowledge of the 10 PREFACE literature of the period unreservedly at my command. I am also indebted to Professor Charles M. Andrews of Yale for material assistance in revising the manuscript and seeing it through the press. Even more thanks are due to Professor W. C. Abbott also of Yale, who first suggested to me this field of study, for he has at all times kindly encouraged and directed my work. My greatest debt of gratitude is, however, to my wife, who has helped me at all stages in the preparation of this work. William Thomas Morgan. Columbia University, March 27, 1919. Preface Introduction Chapter I. Chapter II. Chapter III. Chapter IV. Chapter V. Chapter VI. Chapter VII. Chapter VIII. Chapter IX. CONTENTS Political and Economic Condi- tions in England in 1702 The Queen and Parliament (1702-1704) The Election of 1705 The Disruption of the Minis- try (1705-1708) . The Political Influence of the marlboroughs and go- dolphin (1702-1708) . The Formation of the ' ' Trium- virate" (1700-1704) . The Break-up of the "Trium- virate" (1704-1708) . The Struggle between the Queen and the Junto (1709) The Triumph of the Queen (1709-1710) Conclusion Bibliographical Notes Index page 7 13 19 59 106 149 184 243 279 316 355 395 407 417 INTRODUCTION To trace the origin of a political institution is never easy, but the difficulties are peculiarly baffling when one deals with the antecedents of a political party, because of the many factors that enter into its development. The antiquarian might see in the Republican party of the United States nothing more than the lineal descendant of the old Federalists; another scholar might argue that it originated in the feelings aroused by the Fugitive Slave Law; and the man in the street would probably date its origin from Lincoln's election. Today the evolution of the National Unionist party in Great Britain and the People's party in the United States is, for the average voter, probably clothed in equal darkness. The question of the origin of the Whig and Tory parties in England is similar, but on account of the lapse of time, much more difficult. Daniel Defoe considered the Royalists of the Civil Wars as the embryo of the Tories j 1 another writer on English parties says that the latter part of Charles II 's reign was "an epoch whence we may date not only the rise of the Whig and Tory parties, but also the principles which they severally possess." 2 To this statement Professor W. C. Abbott gives partial as- sent, finding their origin in the later years of Clarendon's ministry when zealous High Churchman and devout Pres- byterian fought each other in the Cavalier Parliament. 3 i Present State of Parties, p. 4 ; Faults on Both Sides, p. 6. See also C. B. E. Kent, Early History of the Tories, p. 11. For a list of abbrevia- tions used in the footnotes see pp. 404-406. 2 George Wingrove Cooke, History of Party, I. 1. 3 ' < History of the Long Parliament of Charles II, " E. H. B., XXI. 44. 14 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES Bolingbroke maintained that the Tories date from the dissolution of this same parliament, but Ranke believed that neither party came into full being until the reign of William III. 1 The decision hinges on the connotation of the term, "political party." If it is no more than "organized opinion," as Disraeli so aptly put it, Whigs and Tories may well be considered in existence in fact, though not in name, before the period of the Commonwealth; if to "organized opinion" be added a more or less established body of principles, the date must be placed considerably later than the Restoration ; if we take it to mean the exist- ence of a reasonably permanent policy and a stable fol- lowing, then the beginning of Queen Anne 's reign is none too late. Even at that time parties were in a very fluid condition compared with those of the later eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, although the cabinet was slowly assuming a definite form. Political parties arise as a convenient method of influ- encing the exercise of the powers of government, but as long as such power rests in the hands of the sovereign, they have little significance. Until the accession of the Stuarts, the crown was the important factor in English government, but under these monarchs the middle classes were aroused at the same time into self -consciousness and revolt. During the Civil Wars, the Parliamentary and Royalist parties became clearly aligned. The latter tem- porarily disappeared, and the former split into several factions, when Cromwell assumed charge of affairs. During the Interregnum a new Royalist party came into existence. For several years this party met with little opposition, but in 1667 it finally crystallized into a de- i L. Von Kanke, Hist, of England, V. 291 ; Bolingbroke, Dissertation on Parties, Lecture III. Hallam dates the use of the terms Whig and Tory from the defeat of the Exclusion Bill. Const. Hist., III. 197. INTRODUCTION 15 mand for the removal of Clarendon, who was essentially the king's prime minister. 1 It is yet scarcely accurate to call either of these fac- tions a true political party, 2 although even as early as the dismissal of Clarendon, they were developing the doc- trines of ministerial responsibility and parliamentary supremacy in the sense in which we use them today, and as the years of the Cavalier Parliament increased, the personal opposition to the monarch, as well as to his policies, developed as each successive by-election sent more independent representatives to the lower house. In consequence, the king found it increasingly difficult to have his way, and it became much more of a task to cajole parliament into voting the necessary supplies. In re- sponse to its wishes, Charles was compelled to sacrifice Danby as he had Clarendon, and at last he was forced to dissolve it, after its members had served eighteen years. Fortunately for the king, the Popish plot came just when matters looked darkest for the monarchy, because reli- gious fanaticism now blinded many to its worst features, and the strength of the opposition grew weaker during the remainder of the reign. Charles II was succeeded by James II, against whom all factions united for a season into one, fired with the common purpose of expelling him for his bold attempt to turn the government over to his Catholic supporters. As soon as James was in exile, these elements again sepa- rated, as the conditions which necessitated their joint efforts no longer existed. By the time William arrived in London, he found numerous opponents, and before long, despite his tact — which Macaulay doubtless exag- iW. C. Abbott, supra cit., E. H. E., XXI. 44; Cooke, I. 4-6. See also L. F. Brown, ' ' Religious Factors in the Convention Parliament, " E. H. B., XXII. 51. 2 On this point the Character of a Tory by John Sheffield, later Duke of Buckingham, is both interesting and instructive. 16 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES gerates — the new monarch had almost as many enemies as friends. Many who had been anxious that James should be dethroned, were yet unwilling to bestow the crown upon one whose claim was based upon parlia- mentary caprice rather than upon heredity. The number of malcontents grew rapidly after Mary's death, which undermined William 's popularity and threw him almost entirely into the hands of those who wished to exalt the power of parliament over the crown. William had no intention of unduly favoring either faction, but he found to his cost that a ministry which took its mem- bership from both sides was impracticable, as it led to interminable quarrels, disturbing the easy administra- tion of public affairs. In fact, William wanted ministers and not a ministry. 1 By 1696 the inveterate hostility of his opponents forced him to ally himself with the advo- cates of parliamentary supremacy. These were to be found among the Dissenters and urban trading classes, who were looking forward to England's commercial ex- pansion. 2 On the other hand, revenues for the war were most grudgingly given by the landed gentry, who saw little gain in humbling the restless ambitions of Louis XIV as long as they were insured a profitable market for their surplus produce. 3 The non-conformists and monied men who supported the king began to form a fairly stable group, favoring a continuance of the war, and, after 1701, the Protestant succession, while exalting the power of parliament as contrasted with the prerogative. They made entirely too much of this last point when they asked William to dismiss his favorite Dutch guards, so he i W. M. Torrens, History of Cabinets, pp. 4-7; Kent, pp. 373-6. 2 Present State of Parties, p. 11. Until recently few historians have seen the political significance of their support of the wars waged by William III and Anne. 3 Mary G. Young, ' ' The Management of the Whig Party under Sir Kobert Walpole. " (Yale doctoral dissertation, unprinted.) INTRODUCTION 17 turned for a brief space to their rivals, who emphasized the power of the king. William was disliked by the High Churchmen, 1 and was unpopular with the faction which he favored because he remained his own prime minister and had little or no regard for their wishes in his conduct of foreign affairs. Anne's reign is characterized both in its domestic and diplomatic aspects by the constant struggle of these two factions for supremacy. Upon her death, the Whigs, through better organization, gained an ascendancy which was not lost until George III came to the throne deter- mined to increase his prerogative. Even he, astute poli- tician as he was, spent nearly a decade undermining the Whig factions, which had been unable to endure con- tinued prosperity. Such in brief is the story of the two parties in England before 1770. The purpose of this monograph is to ascertain the part played by Queen Anne in English politics during the period when Godolphin acted as her first minister, and to note the relative influence of the Marlboroughs, Harley, and Godolphin, and the reasons for their downfall. The relations of Harley with the queen and with Defoe will be studied; considerable attention will be paid to the methods employed in parliamentary elections and, in a more general way, the attitude of the junto and the Tory leaders towards the composite ministries that existed under Godolphin will be examined, in an endeavor to dis- cover wherein lay the power of the Marlboroughs on the one hand and of the Whig junto on the other. Through it all we shall seek to find to what extent political leaders controlled parliament, and in what degree they were con- trolled by it, at a time when sovereignty was gradually, though unconsciously, being transferred from the throne lEijks Archief, 26^; Stepney Papers, Add. MSS., 7076, f. 154; Coke, III. 132. 18 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES to the House of Commons, and the cabinet was slowly evolving into its present form. The approach is neither from the direction of party development nor that of party politics, but rather from that of the reaction of the individual upon the party, as opposed to the reaction of the party upon the individual. This point of view must be somewhat biographical, and even anecdotal at times, but seems the more necessary because of the fluidity of parties and the loose party alle- giance of a large number of the leading statesmen of the day. It was this state of flux which alone permitted the continuance of the non-partisan ministries of Godolphin and the control of government policies by a small group of some half dozen persons. CHAPTER I POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 Before proceeding to a study of the reign of the last of the Stuarts, it is necessary to visualize the situation in England at the accession of Queen Anne in order to understand the problems she had to face. Foreign affairs were in a critical condition. The great- est monarch in Europe was Louis XIV, the deadly enemy of William III. They had fought two wars against each other, both of which had proved indecisive, although Louis was forced to recognize William as king of Eng- land. In 1700 the French king's acceptance of the will of Charles II of Spain, granting the Spanish throne to his grandson, made another war against the Bourbons in- evitable, but England's participation was not assured until Louis broke the treaty of Ryswick by saluting the Pretender as James III. 1 After that insult the English masses were willing to support William in his attempts to humble the French monarch, and he was able to form the Grand Alliance, which isolated Louis, who, except for the Bavarians and the incidental aid received from the Spanish patriots, stood alone against all central and western Europe, particularly the Hapsburgs, Holland, and England. Nevertheless, the French king seemed not unequal to his task, and it was only the genius of the two generals of the Alliance which upset his calculations. English statesmen realized the seriousness of the situa- i [David Jones], The Life of James II, late King of England, p. 419 (1705) ; Eardwicke State Papers, II. 396. 20 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES tion, and did not expect a rapid conclusion of the war. Fortunately for England, William had discovered the latent ability of Marlborough, and made him commander- in-chief in the Netherlands. A short time before his death the king informed Princess Anne that this general was the fittest person to lead her armies and direct her counsels, and for once she was careful to follow William's advice. 1 However serious the military situation might seem, it was further complicated by the unsatisfactory aspect of social and economic affairs. The population of England was practically stationary at five millions, 2 and the pre- vious war had plunged the kingdom deeply into debt, in spite of the fact that William had utilized sources of revenue heretofore untouched. England was not wealthy, because her resources remained largely undeveloped. In agriculture, the fundamental changes which were shortly to revolutionize English rural life had scarcely begun. Jethro Tull had only commenced his experiments with seed drills and deep plowing, which were to mean so much to English farming in the future ; Townshend had not yet forsaken public life to earn the nickname which betokens a fame greater than any he was to win even as first min- ister; while Bakewell and Coke of Holkham were not to become famous for a generation. 3 Methods of cultivation had changed little for a century; the wasteful open field system persisted in spite of the growth of enclosures; great stretches of fertile lands remained uncultivated, whereas the valiant yeomanry, who had been the pride of i Thomas Lediard, Marlborough, I. 136; W. Coxe, Marlborough, I. 76. 2 J. Macpherson, Annals of Commerce, II. 68, 634, 674; Sir F. M. Eden, State of the Poor, I. 228. The best account of the social life of the reign is by John Ashton. W. C. Sydney's England and the English in the Eight- eenth Century and A. Andrews's The Eighteenth Century are also useful. s F. W. Tickner, Social and Industrial History of England, pp. 502-3; House of Lords MSS. (H. M. C), (n. s.), V. 70. CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 21 England since Crecy and Agincourt, gradually decayed 1 as monied men continued to purchase land for the social esteem which it gave. As was to be expected, the changes in industry were more marked. The craft gild was already declining and the adventurous entrepreneur was having recourse to the so-called "domestic system," to speed up production for a wider market. Even here, however, the evolution was comparatively slow and the factory system was nearly a century in the future, although Newcomen invented his engine in 1705. In commerce the development was more marked. 2 Moreover, the expansion of England's com- merce and the extension of her colonial empire were but well begun, although her jealousy of the Dutch remained bitter and India loomed greater with each successive year. So far the American colonies had been allowed to grow unrestrained, and little thought was given to plans for making them contribute to the wealth and welfare of the mother country. 3 An increase in wealth accompanied these changes. The comparative ease with which subscriptions were obtained for the Bank of England in 1694 shows the mobile capital of the realm ; the willingness of this corporation to loan William money in 1697 emphasizes the same point ; while the facility with which Sir Isaac Newton was able to re- form the currency proves it. The manner of the Bank's organization and the nature of its supporters bound it equally to the Revolution and the Whigs, while it pro- vided a most efficient instrument for financing the war. 4 i H. de B. Gibbins, Industry in England, pp. 276-9; E. Fischel, The English Constitution, p. 318. 2 House of Lords MSS. (H. M. C), (n. s.), V. 66-100. 3 C. M. Andrews, "Anglo-French Commercial Kivalry (1700-1750)," A. H. B., XX. 539, 761; Leeky, I. 194; House of Lords MSS. (n. s.), vol. V. xxiii. * House of Lords MSS. (n. s.), vol. VI. xviii. 22 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES Bound up with the war was the question of the church. The Eevolution had been brought on largely by the king's religious fanaticism, and the alignment of political parties had been largely determined by its outcome. James's attempt to strengthen Roman Catholicism had served only to bring persecution upon those whom he wished to serve. Since the Popish plot their plight had been hard enough. From all quarters they were looked upon with the utmost suspicion. It is difficult to account for the terror of Papists manifested by the rank and file of Protestants at a time when the recusants made up less than five per cent of the population, and probably less than one per cent of the people of London held allegiance to the pope. 1 Yet, though all political power had been taken away from the Catholics by the strict laws of Charles II, such fears persisted, forcing the Protestant leaders to invite William to England and exclude all Papists from the throne. The Anglicans disliked the Dissenters but little less than they did the recusants. They could not forget the Commonwealth and Protectorate, and Clarendon's code was placed between the non-conformist and political pre- ferment. And since the ingenuity of the Dissenter with an elastic conscience found the practice of occasional con- formity an easy method of circumventing such acts, despite the loyalty of Presbyterian and Independent, the churchmen loathed them, distrusted their sincerity and feared many of them were republicans in disguise. 2 Another cause of this enmity lay in the fact that the backbone of the non-conformist group was the commer- cial bourgeoisie, whose wealth and importance were in- creasing day by day, and would soon rival that of the landed aristocracy, who worshiped according to the i Great and Good News to the Church of England (1705) ; Burnet, V. 139. 2 Grey 's Debates, II. 134. CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 23 Anglican faith. It was in a sense, despite their frequent marriage alliances, a social struggle between the gentry and the trading classes; it was also political, because wealthy merchants were buying up boroughs and making their way into parliament. 1 Under the most favorable conditions the Anglicans would have found it increasingly difficult to check the growing power of the monied classes. Had they been united, they might have succeeded, but they were very far indeed from being in harmony. Since the time of Laud they had been divided into High and Low Church. The former stood for much ceremony in the service and emphasized the teachings of the church fathers, while the latter favored a simpler service and laid less stress on tradition. High Churchmen opposed comprehension, whereas the Low Church group were heartily in favor of some reasonable compromise whereby all but the most radical Dissenters might be brought into the fold. The Highfliers, as the High Churchmen were called, were re- cruited largely from the conservative country squires, whereas their less zealous brethren were drawn mainly from the leading noble families and the more prosperous merchants. The Anglican clergy were similarly divided, with the bishops predominantly of Low Church ideas, while the parish priests were High Church. Eelated to these eccle- siastics were the non-jurors, who had refused to take the oath of allegiance to William and Mary. Though few, and with their ranks thinning rapidly, these conscientious divines exerted an influence, through their virulence and ability, out of all proportion to their numbers, and formed a nucleus of a faction of the Tories. All the clergy, indeed, took a great interest in political affairs, i Ellis Papers, Add. MSS., 28892, f. 276; Hearne, I. 49; Macpherson, I. 603. 24 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES particularly in elections, when they exercised no incon- siderable influence over the voters in their local areas. 1 While Anne's accession wrought somewhat of con- fusion in religious matters, the state of political parties soon became little short of chaotic. During William's reign, two factions of approximately equal strength existed, which for the sake of clearness are hereafter termed Whig and Tory. The latter was made up of several distinct elements, which together probably made up a majority of the English people. Its strength lay in the rural districts among the pleasure-loving landed gentry, whose loyal tenants also belonged to this party. A considerable part of the lawyers and the nobility like- wise favored the Tories. In a word, the party contained the upper and lower classes, but "wanted the middle and connecting links." 2 Having developed from the old "Cavaliers," and being thoroughly imbued with the divine right theory, its adherents never entirely gave over their loyalty to the exiled Stuarts, as a majority of them probably upheld the doctrine of ' ' passive obedience and indefeasible hereditary right." They were also, in general, stanch champions of the church, 3 and were con- servative in temperament, with a decided weakness for the prerogative and a territorial aristocracy; while they resented the growing influence of the aggressive com- mercial classes. During William's reign, the doctrine of passive obedi- ence proved very troublesome to the Tories, inasmuch as it placed them in a position scarcely loyal to the king they had helped to call from Holland. Under Anne, it i J. Stoughton, Religion in England, pp. 18-9. See also biographies of Bishops Compton, Trelawny, and Atterbury. 2 Kent, pp. 22, 34; see as well Eoger North's Examen, pp. 320-42. 3T. Somerville, Hist, of Polit. Trans., pp. 687-90; May, Const. Hist, II. 21. See also Thomas Papillon, Memoirs of T. Papillon, p. 374. CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 25 was to become still more vexatious. As a matter of fact, the party split over the question of the succession. The most extreme Tories were called Jacobites, and they, like the non-jurors, remained first and foremost the cham- pions of the Pretender, whom they wished to bring back to England at any cost. For the most part they were too fearful of treason to plot much, yet it was well for the country that their numbers were so few. 1 Only a trifle less disposed in that way were the Highfliers, to whom the welfare of the church stood in the same relation as the Pretender to the Jacobites. This faction was led by the Anglican clergy, and was powerful both in numbers and influence. 2 Last of all were the Hanoverian Tories, later styled by St. John, "whimsicals," who supported the Protestant succession, even though it meant putting upon the throne an alien who was inclined to be lenient towards Dissenters and Low Churchmen. Among all the Tories, there was little real leadership of a constructive kind, 3 but the chief weakness of the party lay in the irrecon- cilable attitude of the Jacobite and Hanoverian factions as to the succession after Anne's death. Even if the Whigs were not thoroughly united, they held more common principles than their rivals, as their support of the Act of Settlement bound most of them together, although there was always considerable intri- guing with the Tories. The Whigs came mainly from the trading centers, although their leaders were largely taken from the more prominent noble families. The diminish- ing class of the yeomanry also supported the Whigs. The previous war had increased the importance of the monied i Present State of Parties, p. 51; Bolingbroke, Dissertation on Parties; Lecky, I. 141. The Jacobites diminished in numbers when Gloucester died and Louis XIV recognized the Pretender. Coxe, I. 73-5; Kent, p. 409. 2 Nottingham Papers, Add. MSS., 29588, f. 18; cf. Von Noorden, Boling- broke, p. 97. 3 Coxe, I. 276; cf. Lecky, I. 153. 26 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES group, which had invested so largely in government se- curities, and were consequently supporting the Bank of England. Marriages between the scions of the nobility and the daughters of wealthy traders were not uncommon and did much to increase the power of the "Whigs by gaining for the merchant class a social standing, which the economic development of England was gradually, but surely, to improve. 1 The commercial classes were mainly Low Churchmen and Dissenters, and were much more kindly inclined towards toleration and comprehension than the Tories, while they had much less reverence for the Anglican clergy. 2 They carried the same ideas into politics, and in 1689, in the Bill of Rights, they insisted upon safeguard- ing the people against any arbitrary exercise of the pre- rogative, by making parliament a check upon the king. The Whig liberals went even farther; they championed the cause of civil liberty even at the expense of parlia- ment, if need be. 3 Closely allied to the monied interests, which had risen to power through war, they favored a vigorous prosecution of the struggle against Louis, both on land and sea, while their opponents wished only to retain the mastery of the sea. 4 The future lay with the Whigs. To a greater degree than the Tories, they stood for the economic interests of the nation. As England's commerce and industry in- creased, a larger number of the intelligent middle classes joined their ranks. The kindness of the Whig leaders to the non-conformists gained them many recruits in that quarter. Much to the alarm of the Highfliers, the mass i Defoe, Complete English Tradesman; Hume, Hist, of Eng., ch. LVI; Kent, pp. 450-1 ; T. Papillon, Memoirs of T. Papillon, p. 375. 2 Jonathan Swift in the Examiner, No. 36. 3 The Dangers of Moderation, p. 6; Lord, p. 73. * Macaulay, p. 2391; Marchmont Papers, II. 314; Bolingbroke 's Letters, II. 74, 211. CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 27 of immigrants also favored their opponents. The Whigs had better leaders, who were excellent organizers and most active in converting young men as soon as they showed political promise. 1 On the other hand, the Tory chieftains were under the strain of supporting the queen's prerogative, while undermining her influence by currying favor with the impetuous Jacobites, who must at least be made to believe that the Tories had in mind to destroy the very law which had brought the queen to the throne. "While parties were in such a fluid condition, the power wielded by various influential personages at court was often of vital importance ; hence, it is wise at the outset to study the character of the more notable persons of the realm, for in no reign has the individual statesman played a larger part than in that of Anne. In particular, during this period of transition in constitutional history, when an unpopular king of foreign extraction gave way to a Stuart, the character of the new ruler would have great influence on the trend of affairs. Thus it becomes imperative to know something of the queen 's personality. Anne 's countenance was frank and open, maternal and good-humored ; while her chin showed real Stuart deter- mination, which on sundry occasions approached royal obstinacy. She was inclined to be phlegmatic and good- natured, unless thoroughly aroused, when with a certain amount of grim satisfaction, she saw to it that her wishes were respected and the presumptuous individual put in his proper place. She had a tenacious memory for both favors and injuries, but when she was well, and not unduly antagonized, she was uniformly kind to those about her. This largely accounts for her popularity among the masses, except during the last weeks of her iT. Somerville, Political Transactions, pp. 687-97; M. T. Blauvelt, The Development of Cabinet Government, p. 89. 28 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES life when they began to fear that she was planning to have the Pretender succeed her. 1 In appearance the queen was pleasing. Her figure was comely rather than beautiful, with a decided tendency towards grossness as she grew older, due to an excessive fondness for eating, and a violent antipathy for anything approaching exercise. She was gluttonous; nothing seemed to affect her appetite, not even her grief over her husband's death. Card-playing and hunting were her only forms of recreation, and for the latter she employed a special kind of cart. As a result of her sedentary life, Anne was usually on intimate terms with the gout, which eventually shortened her life. During her coronation she was so "infirm from gout and unwieldy from corpu- lency," that she had to be carried around in a huge sedan chair. 2 She was only thirty-seven years of age, yet in physical stamina she was much older. Little wonder, when we recollect that she had borne at least seventeen children, not one of whom survived to see her crowned ! 3 Few people have had a more unhappy childhood than Lady Anne. At her birth, her uncle, Charles II, was king ; her father, the Duke of York, the heir to the throne ; and her maternal grandfather, the Earl of Clarendon, the leading minister. Her father was a devout Catholic, her mother an equally devout Anglican. Anne 's mother 4 died i Mesnager, Minutes of Negotiations, pp. 40-3; Strickland, XII. 102-5. zPortl. HSS., IV. 34; J. F. Molloy, The Queen's Comrade (2d ed.), I. 302; Colville, p. 120; Notes $■ Queries (9th series), XI. 24, in 1705, a large, fleshy lady was "thought very like her Majesty." Portl. NSS., IV. 177. s Paul says that Anne was a mother eighteen times. A History of the Royal Family gives the names of but five children. Stebbing mentions twelve and "several more miscarriages." Genealog. Hist., pp. 859-65. See also Wyon, I. 46. * J. K. Henslow's Anne Hyde, Duchess of York, is a popular life of Anne's mother. CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 29 while she was still in her teens, and although she was James's favorite, he habitually neglected her, particu- larly after his second marriage, when Anne was left entirely in the care of her mother's relatives, by whom she was carefully nurtured in the Protestant faith. During the excitement following the Popish plot, James was forced to leave England, and thereafter could pay little attention to her welfare. Anne was now very un- happy, as she knew how ardently her father and step- mother desired her to become a Catholic. The princess, thus left to her own resources, soon found solace for her loneliness in the companionship of Sarah Jennings, a clever young woman, some years her senior, and this friendship gradually became closer, until when Anne was married, Sarah, then the wife of John Churchill, became her lady of the bedchamber. Two years later, James became king, and Anne soon learned with horror that he was endeavoring to make England Catholic. Untrained in politics, Anne listened to the advice of her closest friends, and decided to desert her father, rather than renounce Anglicanism, which seemed to her inevitable, if James succeeded in his plans. Those dull November days prior to the king's flight from Eng- land were most trying to the young princess. On the one hand, she was impelled by her love for her father; on the other, by her loyalty to the church and her affec- tion for Mary. In her embarrassment, is it surprising that she sought the aid of her trusted companion, Lady Churchill, who was always so resourceful in times of difficulty? At court everything was in turmoil, and each courtier looked upon his neighbor with unspoken sus- picion. James had led his army from London towards the southwest in order to check William's advance. With him were Prince George and Lord Churchill, of whose desertion of the king London was informed on November 30 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAKTIES 25. Almost at once James withdrew towards his capital, a move which so excited Anne that she threatened to jump out of the window if he came near. To her mind flight was the only thing left, and Lady Churchill, with the willing co-operation of Compton, the deposed bishop of London, completed the arrangement, and the two ladies escaped from court that night. 1 Such unseemly haste has been taken to mean that Anne and probably Sarah as well were surprised by the news that their hus- bands had joined William of Orange. As early as May, 1687, however, Churchill wrote to William that Anne was safe "in the trusting of him," and was certain that she would never embrace Catholicism. 2 A fortnight later, James is reported as believing that Lady Churchill had advised his daughter to go to Hol- land. 3 Since 1685 Anne had been in close communication with her sister Mary, William's wife, and in January, 1688, wrote that she feared the establishment of Catholi- cism in England. 4 As soon as she learned that her father's wife, Mary of Modena, was pregnant, Anne com- plained that her stepmother was entirely too secretive, and doubted whether or not she were enceinte. Nearly a month before the princess left London, her uncle, the second Earl of Clarendon, noted her unwillingness to concede that the child, James Edward, was her brother. 5 i Clarendon Papers, II. 207 ; G. A. Ellis, Ellis Cor., II. 338 ; Cibber 's Apology, pp. 57-9; Dartmouth MSS. (H. M. C), 214; Ailesoury Memoirs (H. M. C), p. 191; Hatton Cor., II. 113, 118; Notes $ Queries (8th series), I. 152. 2 John Dalrymple, Memoirs of Great Britain and Ireland, II. 191. 3 See letters of the French minister in Lingard's Hist, of Eng., X. 351. * Bentinck, Memoires de Mary II, pp. 24-6. Anne probably never ceased to question the Pretender's legitimacy. s Dalrymple 's Memoirs (II, App., Pt. ii. 297-310) contains a large amount of correspondence between Mary and Anne, relative to the queen's pregnancy. See also Bentinck, supra cit., pp. 31-2, and G. Burnet, Memoires pour servir a I'histoire de la Grande Bretagne, pp. 291-7. CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 31 Later, Clarendon again tried to get her to support her father, but she steadily refused, ostensibly because James would not like for her to meddle. Very soon the earl felt called upon once more to remonstrate with her for "un- seemly levity." Anne replied that she "played at cards because it was her daily custom, and that she never did anything that looked like affected constraint. ' ' The true reason is now quite apparent, for Anne had already written William that Prince George would join him "as soon as his friends think it proper. ' n Within a few days she remarked to Clarendon that the people were so afraid of popery that many more would follow his son's example and desert to William. 2 When Churchill went over to William, he left a letter for James, professing deep sor- row in having to leave him on account of his religious scruples. Prince George penned a similar explanation, emphasizing the same point of religion, and voicing the same hope that the king might come to no harm, and Anne likewise wrote to the queen, expressing identical senti- ments. 3 These letters convince one that it is almost in- conceivable that each of the three should have left notes of explanation so similar in phrase and content, unless there had been a previous agreement on the subject. It would seem, therefore, that Anne 's decision to aban- don her father was not taken on the spur of the moment, so her fright must have been due to the unexpected return of James to London ; and his order to the lord chamber- lain to seize Churchill's houses in London and St. Albans, and probably take his wife into custody as well, discon- certed her and her companion, who were both short of i Dalrymple, Memoirs, II, Pt. i. 333. 2 Clarendon Papers, II. 305. See also Thomas, p. 37; Lingard, Hist, of Eng., X. 352. sLansdowne MSS (B. M.), 1236, f. 230; W. Kennett, Complete Hist., III. 498. 32 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES funds at that time. Had they planned a long journey. Lady Churchill certainly would have attended to that matter in plenty of time. Had Anne been unable to pre- vail upon the lord chamberlain to delay the execution of his order, Lady Churchill could not have left London at that time. 1 Yet Sarah's influence was a factor in Anne's desertion of her father, although her devotion to the church was proverbial, 2 and her dislike and fear of Mary of Modena a matter of common report. Believing that deception had been employed at the birth of the Pre- tender, she was seized with a deep resentment against the Catholics, who seemed bent upon depriving her of her right to the throne. Anne did much to advance the suc- cess of the Revolution by deserting her father. Lacking her aid, William might never have become king, and with- out her continued support, "his throne would suffer in stability and dignity. ' ' As soon as William had established himself in London, Anne returned to the Cockpit in Whitehall and gave her loyal support to William and Mary. Her stand is said to have been due to Lady Churchill, who disclaims the responsibility, although conceding that she persuaded the princess "to the project of that settlement, and to be easy under it, after it was made." 3 Whoever may have prompted her, it is indisputable that she had the courage to stand forth publicly against her father and Catholi- cism. Unhappily, her religion was so akin to supersti- tion that she never ceased to regret this step. Anne, realizing that she had been her father's favorite, could never think of him in exile without remorse, and the Jaco- i Colville, p. 71. 2Harleian MSS., 6584, f. 271a; Macpherson, I. 282; Bentinck, supra cit., p. 28. 3 Conduct, pp. 19-22; Other Side, p. 22; Macaulay, p. 1292. Lady Churchill insisted, however, that it took the additional urging of Lady Eussell and Dr. Tillotson to cause Anne to give up her present right to the throne. CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 33 bites saw to it that she was constantly reminded of her ingratitude. 1 The princess was just as willing, however, to stand for her rights against the new sovereigns. Friction soon arose between Anne and the king, because his attitude was not what she had anticipated when she championed his claim to the throne. For this quarrel Macaulay holds the Churchills entirely responsible, insisting that Anne was completely controlled by them, and that they brought her into serious financial difficulties ; first with her father and later with William. No one doubts the exceeding fondness of the Churchills for money, or that its accumu- lation was one of the leading motives of their public and private life, but this alone does not prove the charge against them, although there is a strong presumption that they feathered their nest according to the" prevailing fashion. Anne had been most liberally supported by both her uncle and her father, but she was ever in financial straits. Yet, Lady Churchill repeatedly tells us that the princess was exceedingly economical, and many others bear out her testimony. Anne never purchased a jewel for her own use, as she looked upon jewelry as the greatest of vanities. When the Earl of Oxford wished parliament to purchase the Pitt diamond for her, she forbade it, saying "it was a . . . pity that Greenwich Hospital was not finished." 2 If, then, Anne did not spend her allowance herself, what became of it? Lady Churchill, now Countess of Marlborough (1689), also emphasized Anne's lavish rewards to her friends. As Sarah and her husband were her most intimate asso- i In 1701, Mary of Modena sent her James's dying wishes. Beaumont et Bernois, La Cour des Stuarts, p. 237; T. S. Evans, Life of Robert Frampton, p. 205. 2 Dartmouth MSS. (H. M. C), Intro., v; Journal to Stella, 8 August, 1711. 34 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES ciates, what is more natural than that the princess should shower gifts upon them? The countess may have been an "abandoned liar," as Macaulay suggests, but her word may well be accepted when she unconsciously con- demns herself, by saying that Anne bestowed upon her a pension and later gave a dowry of £5,000 to each of her four charming daughters. 1 To anyone who knows aught of the countess, it is inconceivable that she should be surrounded by wealth without securing some of it, or that the princess should bestow choice gifts upon other friends and totally neglect her. The greater Anne's allowance, the more bountiful would be her presents. Thus both self-interest and friendship would urge the countess to aid Anne to in- crease her pension. At any rate, William's reign was scarcely a year old before Anne demanded a liberal settle- ment as heir apparent. Although enjoying a pension in excess of £30,000, she asked for £70,000. Nor was appli- cation made to the king, inasmuch as William had stated in emphatic terms that he could not understand how ' ' the Princess could spend £30,000 a year." Consequently her case was presented directly to parliament. William immediately sent the Duke of Shrewsbury to wait upon the countess, asking her to obtain Anne's permission to withdraw the case from the Commons, and offering the princess a settlement of £50,000 a year. 2 The countess expressed some doubt of the king's sincerity, and advised Shrewsbury to wait upon Anne in person. He met a cool reception there, as the princess replied: "Since that affair was before the Commons, it must even take the course and be concluded by that wise body." She thought herself justified in seeking an allowance, and i Eeid, pp. 117, 471. It was current that Sarah gained "much larger sums ' ' by gambling with Anne. Thomas, p. 49 ; Marlb. MSS., p. 52. 2 R. Doebner, Memoirs of Mary II, p. 17; Conduct, p. 33; C. J., X. 310. CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 35 "reasonable to see what her friends could do for her." 1 Firmly on this ground she stood, and parliament finally voted her £50,000 a year. 2 Anne had gained her end and somewhat humiliated William, but she was soon to find it a Pyrrhic victory. The king thought the Marlboroughs responsible for the obstinacy of the princess. Indeed, there was no doubt of it, as the countess openly boasted of her part in it. 3 Why did the latter side with Anne? Was it because she thought it her duty to guard the oppressed? This is unlikely, as the princess had been well treated up to this time. 4 Two probable explanations appear; either the countess expected to share in Anne's good fortune, or she saw, in thus opposing William, a better opportunity of aiding her husband in his schemes, the exact nature of which still remains a matter of doubt. Before many months had passed, however, the king began to suspect Marlborough. Fearing that he was in communication with James II, he dismissed the earl from all his employments, forbade him to attend court, and later committed him to the Tower. Such a move placed in jeopardy the countess's honorable position, since it was not customary, even in those days of double-dealing, for a traitor's wife to retain an important place at court. Yet this might have passed unnoticed, had the countess remained in the background; had not Anne, insisting upon her rights, brought her along when she called upon the queen! This incident partly explains Mary's frank i Coke, III. 123. Coke said this was her reply to Wharton and Shrews- bury. 2C. J., X. 310, 319; Other Side, p. 37; Conduct, pp. 32-4. 3 See Life of the Duchess, pp. 16-21; Doebner, Memoirs, p. 18; Conduct, pp. 31-5. * The countess was then high in the graces of William and Mary herself, as she thought her recommendation might help her uncle, Dr. Lister, obtain a post as one of the king's five physicians, although four were already chosen. Lister MSS. (Bodl.), IV. 5. 36 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES letter to her sister. "I tell you plainly," she wrote, "Lady Marlborough must not continue with you in the circumstances her lord is." The demand was reasonable, but it was couched in unfriendly terms, 1 and Anne would have been scarcely human had she not resented its spirit. "I think," she replied, "this proceeding can be for no other intent than to give me a very sensible mortification, so there is no misery that I cannot readily resolve to suffer, rather than thoughts of parting with her. ' ' 2 Marlborough's disgrace was not the sole cause of the queen's action, as Mary had more than three years before criticized the religious views of the countess. "I am sorry people have taken great pains to give you so ill a character of Lady Churchill," was the princess's loyal retort. "I believe there is nobody in the world has better tokens of religion than she has. I am sure she is not as strict as some are, nor does she keep such a bustle with religion ; which I confess I think ne 'er the worse, for one sees so many saints devils that if you be a good Christian the less stir one makes it better in my opinion. As for her moral principles, it is impossible to have better and without that all the lifting eyes, [and] going to Church will prove but very lame devotion." 3 The queen also suspected that the countess was probably aiding her hus- band in reconciling Anne and her father. Although Mary may have lacked definite proof of Anne's complicity, the latter unquestionably had written to James weeks before Marlborough's disgrace, expressing remorse for her desertion, and a deep concern for his misfortunes. 4 Mis- i Miss Sandars thinks ' ' no one can accuse it of harshness. ' ' Mary II, p. 319. She probably follows Burnet. Harleian MSS., 6584, f. 69a. 2 Thomson, I. 458-9 ; Conduct, p. 58. s Birch MSS. (B. M.), 4163. Mary was told that Sarah "abhors Catholicism. ' ' * Ailesbury Memoirs (H. M. C), p. 293; Strickland, XII. 135. For Mary's own account, see Doebner, Memoirs, p. 38. CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 37 trusting her sister's loyalty, and disliking her independ- ence, the queen could do no less than insist upon the dis- missal of the woman she held responsible for both. Being naturally wilful and possessed of a profound liking for the countess, Anne was loath to part with her, but it was not this alone that accounts for her attitude ; she had personal grievances against both the king and queen, the most important of which was William's cava- lier treatment of her husband, Prince George of Den- mark. Authorities are for once in complete accord as to the mediocrity of Prince George. Charles II 's witty remark that he had tried him both drunk and sober, and that "drunk or sober, there is nothing in him," was cor- roborated by James II when he learned of his desertion. "What, is est-il-possible gone! Were he not my son-in- law, a single trooper would have been a greater loss." 1 William was proverbially impatient with men of slender ability, hence he tactlessly paid little attention to his clumsy, stupid, besotted brother-in-law. Although me- diocre in intelligence, Prince George was exceedingly desirous to be of service and asked to accompany William to Ireland. He was denied, however, the usual courtesy of traveling in the same coach with the king, an honor which was reserved for the Earl of Portland. The prince probably paid little attention to this slight, but Anne's indignation was aroused, although she might have over- looked the discourtesy, had it not been followed by another. The crisis in English naval affairs after the unfortunate battle of Beachy Head (1690) probably appealed to George's patriotism, and he begged to go to sea without a command. Mistaking William's silence as consent, he prepared to take ship. By that time the king was in Holland, and it fell to Mary to prohibit the i Lingard, Hist, of Eng., X. 352. The prince was called est-il-possible from his customary exclamation. 38 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES prince's sailing, after she had found it impossible to persuade him to forego his plans. Anne nursed other grievances as well, one of which was some unpleasantness over the place of residence of herself and her family. She desired the apartments formerly occupied by the Duchess of Portsmouth. Since she was unable to secure quarters for her servants near them, she took the Portsmouth apartments for her chil- dren, and remained herself at the Cockpit. She later asked for Richmond Palace that her children might have better air, but this was refused, probably because it was being used by the sister of William's mistress, and Anne felt very indignant, particularly because she had to bow to the wishes of a shameless woman. In addition, William's personal discourtesies to the princess increased her determination to keep the countess with her. Thoroughly aware of the importance of her position, Anne felt that the king was ungrateful for the part she had played in the Revolution. So to all forms of persuasion she was impervious, and she wrote again to her sister : " I am sorry I find that all I have said myself, and Lord Rochester for me, has not had effect enough to keep your Majesty from persisting in a resolution, which you are satisfied must be so great a mortification to me, as, to avoid it, I shall be obliged to deprive myself of the satisfaction of living where I might have frequent oppor- tunity of assuring you of my duty and respect." 1 Anne's threat to retire did not weaken Mary's decision, although she wrote once more, making her intentions much clearer. The queen insisted upon immediate com- pliance, and the princess left court, not only to retain the countess's companionship, but because she felt that such a move would make her appear a martyr in the eyes of i Conduct, p. 58. CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 39 the English masses among whom William was so unpopu- lar. If the king or queen "imagine to vex me or gain upon me by such sort of usage, they will be mightily dis- appointed," she wrote to the countess, "and I hope that these foolish things they do, will every day show people more and more what they are, and that they truly deserve the name your faithful Morley has given them." 1 She was correct in her surmise, because William's attitude towards Anne increased his difficulties with parliament. How grateful the princess was to the woman who had supported her interests at court appears in a letter, which exhibits so much of her force of character as to warrant its being quoted at length. "I must give my dear Mrs. Freeman ten thousand thanks for her two kind letters and assure her 'tis not necessary to make excuses at length. Could you imagine how very welcome they are to me, I am sure you would not do it. I hear Lord Marl- borough is sent to the Tower and though I am certain they have nothing against him and expected by your letter it would be so, yet I was struck when I was told of it, for me thinks it is a dismal thing to have one's friends sent to that place. I have a thousand melancholy thoughts and can't help fearing they should hinder you from coming to me, though how they could do that without making you a prisoner too, I cannot imagine. I am just now told by pretty good hands that as soon as the wind turns westerly there will be guards set upon the Prince and me. If you hear there is any such thing de- signed and 'tis easy to you, pray let me see you before the wind changes, for afterwards one does not know whether they will let one have opportunities of speaking to one another. But let them do what they please, i Molloy, Queen's Comrade, I. 219. To avoid meaningless etiquette in their letters, Anne and Sarah adopted the names of Morley and Freeman respectively. 40 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES nothing shall ever vex me so I can have the satisfaction of seeing dear Mrs. Freeman. I swear I could live upon bread and water between four walls with her without repining, for as long as you continue kind nothing can ever be a real mortification to your faithful Morley, who wishes she may never have a moment's happiness in this world or the next, if ever she proves false to you. ' " As early as 1691, Anne had been alarmed by the in- formation that she was really "an honourable prisoner and in the hands of the Dutch guards, ' ' but she was terri- fied now by the warning that unless she dismissed the countess voluntarily, she would be "obliged to it." 2 Her punishment began at once and nothing "in the power of the Crown to inflict upon her was spared. ' ' 3 Her guard of honor was taken away; foreign ministers ceased to wait upon her ; the rector at St. James was advised not to show her the usual courtesies; when she went to Bath, the mayor was requested to omit the formalities with which royal visitors were customarily received. The courtiers quickly took the hint, and the prince and prin- cess were neglected. Anne bitterly complained of this ostracism: "I cannot end this without telling you that the guards in St. James Park did not stand to their arms, either when the Prince went or came. I can't believe it was their Dutch breeding alone, but Dutch orders made them do it, because they never omitted it before, and they could not pretend to be surprised." 4 In Anne's delicate state of health such treatment was nothing if not brutal, but it only added to her obstinacy. ' ' Being now at liberty to go where I please, by the Queen's refusal to see me," she wrote to the countess, "I am mightily inclined to go i Keid, p. 77. 2 Thomson, I. 203-6. 3 Macaulay, pp. 2127-8. 4 Keid, p. 83. See also Marlb. MSS., p. 58; Burnet, IV. 164. CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 41 tomorrow after dinner to the Cockpit, and from thence privately in a chair to see you. ' n Did the countess urge Anne to resist the queen? She denied the accusation categorically, and her statement is rendered probable by some lines of the princess : ' ' Can you think either of us [George and Anne] so wretched," she wrote, "that for the sake of £20,000 and to be tor- mented from morning to night with flattering knaves and fools, we should forsake those we have such obligations to, and that we are so certain we are the occasion of all their misfortunes." 2 Later Anne said: "You must give me leave, at once, to beg you will never mention so cruel a thing again, for it pierces to my very heart and soul, and for God's sake, be assured, besides the acting a base, ungrateful part towards you (which is a thing I abhor) I am fully persuaded I should be the meanest, pityfullest wretch on earth if I did not retire." 3 Anne was so aroused that she vowed she would keep the countess "in spite of their teeth," and would go to the "utmost verge of the earth rather than live with such monsters. ' ' 4 She swore, moreover, that she "would sooner be torn in pieces" 5 than yield, and yield she never did, although subjected to systematic persecution. Even under the trying ordeal of her last interview with Queen Mary, her will power stood the test. While recovering from a serious illness, she was waited upon without ceremony by the queen, who demanded forthwith the countess's dis- missal. Anne replied that she "had never in all her life i Conduct, p. 79. See also Chamberlen, p. 9; Clarke and Foxcroft, Burnet, p. 307. 2 Molloy, Queen's Comrade, I. 215; Other Side, pp. 109-10; Conduct, pp. 72-3. 3 Eeid, p. 79. * Thomson, I. 460-3. s Eeid, pp. 83-4, 88. For Mary's statements see Doebner, Memoirs, p. 45. Several of Anne's letters are printed in Molloy, op. cit., I. 209-50. 42 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES disobeyed her, except in that one particular, which she hoped would some time or other, appear as reasonable to her Majesty as it did to her." 1 Few persons have the courage, even under extraor- dinary condition, to intrigue against their parents. Yet Anne, often charged with obtuseness and pusillanimity, helped make the Revolution possible, because she feared for the future of Protestantism in England. James II never suspected his retiring daughter of so much deter- mination, while William and Mary never supposed that Anne would be so bold as to disobey their commands. Yet she asked parliament for a settlement and secured it ; furthermore, she would not, even in the face of threats and insults, part with Lady Marlborough. Both Anne and Mary were bent upon having their own way, and all hopes of a reconciliation were cut short by the latter 's tragic death. Soon afterwards William showed a great many marks of disrespect to the princess, which became so apparent that people began to murmur, and finally, for political reasons, the king, at Somers's instigation, permitted the princess to return to court, though even then she was suspected of intriguing with her father. Anne's desire to choose the members of the Duke of Gloucester's establishment increased William's distrust ; yet he acceded to her wishes in appointing Marl- borough as the boy's guardian, although he insisted upon Burnet as tutor. 2 The young duke suddenly died in 1700 and Anne was inconsolable. The king had become inordinately fond of his namesake, and looked upon him as England's future king. With his death, the last tie binding William to his sister-in-law was dissolved. Her loss filled Anne with i Conduct, p. 70. See London Gazette, 17 April, 1692. 2 FranUand-Bussell-Astley MSS. (H. M. C), p. 94; T. Somerville, Trans., p. 629. CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 43 superstitious fear, for she concluded that her bereave- ment was really a punishment for deserting her father, whose forgiveness she decided to gain before it was too late. So she asked his permission to accept the crown in accordance with the Act of Settlement that had just been passed. 1 Being already suspicious of Anne, James was now convinced of her duplicity, and thought ' ' she merely wished to learn his intentions that she might defeat them, if they were opposed to her own determination to rule as queen." 2 This judgment was unfair, because Glouces- ter's death had weakened her resolution to ascend the throne which by hereditary right belonged to her father. 3 William III, surrounded as he was by intriguers, had become more alert, and quickly learned of Anne's corre- spondence. Already embittered against her, he deter- mined to punish her severely, by refusing the usual for- malities of mourning at court for her son. William's hatred was heartily reciprocated. "I cannot let your servant go back," Anne wrote to Godolphin, ''without returning my thanks for the letter, and assuring you it is a very great satisfaction to me to find you agree . . . concerning the ill-natured cruel proceedings of Mr. Cali- ban [William] who vexes me more than you can imagine, and I am out of all patience when I think I must do so monstrous a thing as not to put my lodgings in mourning for my father." 4 Such barbarous treatment in no sense broke down her will. She remained as rebellious as ever, and it is diffi- i E. Spanheim, Relation de la cour d'Angleterre, p. 600; C. Cole, Memoirs of Affairs of State, p. 193; Clarke, James II, II. 559. 2 Kyan, I. 84. See ib., I. 149. 3 L 'Hermitage to Heinsius, 10 March, 1702, Eijks Archief, 26 A . * Godolphin Papers, Add. MSS., 28070, f. 2. "Caliban," "Dutch Monster," and "Abortion" were Mrs. Freeman's and Mrs. Morley's favorite names for William. Macaulay criticises such expressions by Anne as the ' ' style of a fishwoman, ' ' which would seem somewhat too severe. Hist., p. 2128. 44 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES cult to conclude that she acted as a tool of the Marl- boroughs. Indeed, she had a will and policy all her own, in the carrying out of which the countess rendered great service because it was to her interest, financial and other- wise, to do so. When Anne became queen, she really needed Lady Marlborough's help at court, so she made her groom of the stole and keeper of the privy purse. Military affairs were in a critical state, and the queen chose Marlborough — the only able English general — as the head of her army. These two appointments have usually been taken to mean that Queen Anne was entirely controlled by the captain-general and his wife. The great Whig historian has given wide currency to this idea, and his less able successors have assumed that, if the Marlboroughs ' in- fluence over Princess Anne was large, their power over Queen Anne was supreme. An examination of Anne's early life has not proved that she was so completely under their control, and their later relations must be studied before any conclusions can be drawn. Before proceeding farther, however, three additional incidents, throwing some light upon Anne's intelligence and force of character, will be given. During James's reign, the Earl of Scarsdale, an officer in Anne's house- hold, having incurred the king's displeasure, was sum- marily dismissed from all his offices. The princess sought to retain him, and yielded only to James's direct command. The Earl of Sunderland was one of the shrewdest men of the Revolution ; he was first on one side and then on the other; no statesman of his time pre- tended to understand him. In the light of all his re- searches, Macaulay confessed his inability to fathom the man, and even with our present-day knowledge, he remains much of a mystery. ' ' One thing I forgot to tell you about this noble Lord," wrote Anne to her sister CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 45 early in 1688, "which is that if everything does not go here as he would have it, that he will pick a quarrel with the court, and so retire, and by that means it is possible he may make his court to you." 1 In view of his later activities, this is one of the best prophecies in regard to this political trickster of which we have any record. The Earl of Rochester, Anne's uncle, was another in- fluential statesman of the Revolution, and was active as an intermediary in her quarrel with Mary. From his attitude towards her, as well as the general tenor of these negotiations, Anne gained the idea that he was trying to trick her. Without wasting a single moment, she wrote : "I give you many thanks for the compliments and ex- pressions of service . . . which I should be much better pleased with, than I am, if I had any reason to think them sincere." 2 This note must have come as a decided sur- prise to a skilful minister, who probably imagined he was hoodwinking his unsophisticated niece. It is now time to note the characterizations of Anne given by a number of secondary writers, and later the basis for their statements will be examined. Cooke's estimate is among the most hostile. Speaking of these "two weak-minded persons," he insisted that "Anne was scarcely superior to her husband in intellect; her opinions were prejudices; they had been received without exami- nation, and were retained without suspicion. ' ' 3 The full force of this comparison is apparent only when we recall the caustic remarks of Charles II and James II, who knew her consort well. We gain the same impression of Anne from Macaulay, who says that "When in good humour she was meekly stupid, and when in ill humour, sulkily stupid." "Her powers of mind were certainly i Ryan, I. 150. 2 Conduct, p. 93; Colville, p. 92; Other Side, pp. 93-5. 3 History of Party, I. 525, 543. See also J. Forster, Defoe, pp. 41-2. 46 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES not considerable, ' ' notes Lord Mahon. ' ' She had no wit of her own nor appreciation of wit in others. No one could have less share, less sympathy, in the great intel- lectual movements . . . [of] her reign." In the latter part of this observation there is unquestionably a large element of truth, as the queen's interests were con- fessedly personal and political. Paul caustically says that "She never showed any power, and seldom any wish, to comprehend the great issues of European politics, the fierce struggles of political parties, which were decided and fought out by her soldiers and ministers in her name." Another writes, "Poor Anne, unfortu- nately scarcely ever enjoyed more than the shadow of that authority, which was disputed by factions, both equally intent upon personal aggrandizement." 1 The evidence cited by these harsh critics is scarcely sufficient to warrant such reflections, but they form the basis for the current conceptions of Queen Anne. It is, however, somewhat surprising that so little attention has been paid to Jonathan Swift's keen observations, 2 and the statements of Voltaire, while much of the force of the accounts by the Duchess of Marlborough and Lady Masham seem to have been lost. All these will be noticed in due time. Some idea of the new queen has now been gained, and we shall next glance briefly at some of the more con- spicuous characters of the reign. The men first to be mentioned cannot be strictly considered as members of either the "Whig or the Tory parties, since they are found 1 Thomson, II. 179. For similar characterizations, see Michael, Eng. Gesch., I. 227; Strickland, XII. 44; Von Noorden, I. 185; M. G. Howitt, Queens of England, p. 478. A more favorable view may be found in A. L. Cross, Hist, of Eng. and Greater Britain, Eoscoe, Barley, W. F. Lord, Politi- cal Parties, and Bunbury, Eanmer. 2 Change in the Queen's Ministry and Four Last Years of the Beign. His Journal to Stella hints at the same thing. CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 47 acting first with one and then with the other, in some important capacity. This was largely due to the lax political morality of the years succeeding the Eevolution, when statesmen chose safety rather than consistency as their motto. Another cause for this vacillation was the indefinite stand of the two parties on many questions; while, as now, the disappointed politician sought alliances where his merits would be most substantially rewarded. Marlborough was one of these statesmen without fixed political affiliations, and is generally esteemed the great- est of them all, on account of his transcendent ability as general, diplomat, and politician. Voltaire said that he never fought a battle without victory, or besieged a town without success. He had already served three sovereigns, but to none of them had he been true. Nevertheless, the charm of the man was irresistible, despite his squeaky voice and penuriousness. His pleasing address never gained him any widespread popularity, however, even in the hour of victory, because he was always too self- centered, and owned no principle but self-interest. At the beginning of Anne's reign, the earl was thoroughly Tory in sympathy, 1 due in all probability to his reverence for the crown and the principles of the Established Church, but such an alliance soon proved embarrassing, as the Tories were unwilling to enter enthusiastically into the war. The political career of Marlborough would be most interesting in itself, but it becomes vital when one con- siders that his talented wife was Anne's trusted com- panion. The countess was the most talked-of woman of her age, as well as the most cordially hated. In contrast to her cool, imperturbable husband, she was quick-tem- pered and exceedingly frank, while her likes and dislikes i Consult the letter of Bonet, the Prussian representative in London, which is quoted by Von Noorden, I. 200. 48 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES were both well pronounced. As the mother of four at- tractive daughters, all of whom married into the noblest families of England, Lady Marlborough would have been closely connected with political affairs, even though she had not been Mrs. Morley's "dear Mrs. Freeman." Her most prominent son-in-law was Sunderland's heir and one of the Whig leaders. Either from natural inclination and her Low Church proclivities, or through his influence, the countess soon began to favor the Whigs, and at- tempted to convert her husband. Sidney, later Earl of Godolphin, was closely allied with the Marlboroughs in politics and his son had married their eldest daughter. He was a modest, self-effacing man, who had the tact and good fortune to serve the last three monarchs in important financial positions, gener- ally to the satisfaction of each. Charles II aptly sum- marized his character by saying that he "was never in the way, and never out of it." Though possessed of great financial ability, he was very much of a bore in society, as his chief interests lay in cock-fighting and horse-racing, and he was never thoroughly happy except at the Newmarket race course. Thrown, as he was, into the maelstrom of partisan politics, he showed his lack of courage and of political acumen, and was overcome by an abler intriguer, who was less timorous and fearful of responsibility. Robert Harley was an important associate of both Marlborough and Godolphin. He was reared a Presby- terian, and his family had always been Whig, but he was ambitious and promotion came slowly among the Whigs, who had a number of active leaders; so he became a moderate Tory, although his principles remained those of a conservative Whig throughout his career. His polit- ical abilities were of a high order, but they were to no inconsiderable extent nullified by his habit of extreme pro- CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 49 crastination, and an attitude of perfect inscrutableness even to his most intimate friends. Both these traits were accentuated in later years by an ungovernable fondness for drink, 1 which frequently incapacitated him for effec- tive political activity. Henry St. John was an intimate friend of Harley, and had somewhat the same political inclinations. In his own day he was famed equally as an orator, literary man, intriguer, free-thinker, and libertine, a reputation which in all its phases has not grown less with age. He changed to the Tories about the time of Anne's accession, and like Harley gained a place in the composite ministry of Godolphin through his political sagacity. Each of these men was without any scruples or gratitude, when such inconvenient principles stood in the way of political ad- vancement. They and the queen were really the ' ' admin- istration" from the summer of 1710 until Anne's death, and their political manipulations were probably as skilful as any that England had ever seen. The Duke of Shrewsbury was a shrewd courtier, who stood between the Godolphin and Harley ministries and was the nemesis of both. He was of illustrious birth and ample fortune. Personally he was most agreeable and possessed great culture, speaking French and Italian like a native. His notorious mother exerted much power over him, and he was educated a Catholic, but through Somers's influence he became a Protestant and a Whig. Nevertheless, he remains one of the most elusive public men of all time. His party affiliations were more variable than those of the other men already mentioned. In the i Cowper 's Diary contains a good characterization, although it is a trifle too severe, even from a fair-minded opponent Lady Marlborough's opinion is not as hostile as might be expected. Priv. Cor., I. 140. Many of Harley 's letters may be found in the Portland Papers. His severest critic is the author of A Detection of the Secret History of the White Staff. Cf. Swift 's estimates in the Journal to Stella, passim. 50 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES case of the others, one is able to tell on which side they were for the nonce, but for Shrewsbury this is impossible, perhaps for the simple reason that he did not know himself. He had served James II and then had helped seat William on the throne. For motives known only to himself, he corresponded with James, but in the face of exposure he resigned. Indeed, he had a most adroit way of avoiding political responsibility by quitting office at critical moments upon a plea of illness. Yet this vacil- lating, one-eyed, sickly gallant exerted more authority in important crises in English politics than any other statesman of his day. 1 On one occasion, he helped create a revolution; at another, he overthrew a ministry; at a third, he assured the Protestant succession in the House of Hanover and spoiled all the plans of the Jacobites. Another interesting character of the epoch was Daniel Finch, Earl of Nottingham, whom Swift dubbed as "Dismal." His father was Sir Heneage Finch, a judge of great ability, and Daniel resembled his parent in many ways. He was one of the most virtuous and honorable men in a time of loosest morality. Although an orator of parts, he was much too prolix, and his gloomy demeanor prevented his making many friends. His religious sin- cerity was exceptional, and he remained throughout life a steadfast Churchman. Although allied with the High Churchmen, he had stood, not only for toleration but for comprehension. 2 He was a man of much influence, but imperious, and early in Anne's reign incurred her fatal displeasure by his insolence. At heart a thoroughgoing Tory, he had a high idea of the prerogative. He aided in overthrowing the Whigs in 1710, but Harley failed to satisfy his ambition for a portfolio, and he left his party i Shrewsb. Cor., pp. 634-45; Macky, Memoirs, p. 14; Hearne, I. 140; Priv. Cor., II. 124. 2 Harleian MSS. (B. M.), 6584, ff. 270b; Macaulay, pp. 894, 1394. CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 51 at a most critical moment, when nothing short of a revolu- tionary measure sufficed to keep it in power. 1 This ends the list of "waverers," and we now turn to the leading Tories. Rochester was perhaps the fore- most of them. He was honest, but his ability was medi- ocre, and his mismanagement in 1685 cost the Exchequer £45,000. 2 Like Harley, he was much too fond of drink. 3 He was vehement in the extreme and when aroused swore like a porter. Nevertheless, he was a typical High Church Tory, who hated the Dissenters worse than he did Satan, heartily opposed England's entrance into the war as a principal, and was averse to any extension of parlia- mentary rights and privileges. Sir Edward Seymour was another influential High- flier, although he confessed that seven years had passed " since he had received the sacrament or heard a sermon in the Church of England." 4 He was a descendant through the elder line of the Protector Somerset, and his political power in the southwestern counties, particularly around Exeter, was usually supreme. He was as proud as Jupiter, absolutely fearless, possessed considerable skill as a debater, and was well versed in parliamentary usages. He might have done much to reform parlia- mentary representation had he been less corrupt and intolerant. Finally, we must mention as belonging to this group, Sir Simon Harcourt, who was not so devoted a churchman as Seymour or Rochester, but was a loyal Tory, and probably the most brilliant lawyer in his party. Another type of Tory carried its politics to the point 1 The creation of twelve Tory peers December 31, 1711. 2Macaulay, pp. 241, 268; Ailesbury MSS. (H. M. C.), I. 232. s On one occasion after stripping himself almost naked, he climbed a post to drink King William's health. Macky, Memoirs, p. 30; Remarks on the Conduct, pp. 36, sq. * Cunningham, History of Great Britain, I. 317. 52 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES of treason, and bore the name of Jacobite. The number belonging to this faction was not as large as is usually supposed, since its apparent strength came from the reputation of a few leaders, of whom Ormond stands as the most picturesque, for though certainly not the ablest, he was a popular hero and the idol of his party. 1 He was generous to a fault, but exceedingly vain, and his aver- sion to business was proverbial, while at critical moments he was timid and vacillating. A man of much greater force was Dr. Atterbury, later bishop of Rochester. He was the soul of the Jacobite movement among the clergy, and was firmly ensconced in the affections of the court. When the time came to test the strength of the Jacobites, he stood almost alone in advocating violence. 2 The Earl of Jersey was a Jacobite of considerable prominence but of little real ability. Without much doubt, the leading figure of this group was the Scottish Duke of Hamilton, whose untimely death in a duel had much to do with the final discomfiture of the Jacobites upon the queen's death. 3 He was very close to the sovereign, closer, some aver, than any other man, save possibly Harley. The Tories were unfortunate in having their member- ship divided into three distinct factions, but doubly so in having their leaders split up so equally among these groups, which refused to co-operate in carrying through important policies. The Whigs were more closely organ- ized and possessed a definite policy. Their cohesive force came from the Hanoverian succession; their motive power and directing energy, from the second Whig junto, which was composed of Somers, Wharton, Halifax, Or- ford, and Charles Spencer, later Earl of Sunderland. i Macky, Memoirs, p. 10; Wyon, I. 105. 2 See King's Anecdotes, pp. 8-9. s Just before his death he was nominated peace plenipotentiary, and it was the Pretender 's great misfortune that Shrewsbury succeeded him. CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 53 All five were men of ability, particularly the first three. Of this group one man has said: "Somers was the great- est . . • , Wharton the noisiest, Sunderland the most in- solent, Halifax the most brilliant, and Orford the most respectable." 1 They formed the inner Whig organiza- tion, and held together in an amazing way. They planned their policies, usually with considerable skill, and caused the Tories no end of uneasiness, even when the latter boasted a comfortable working majority in parliament. Of this clique Wharton seems to have been the astute political manager, while Somers gave it stability. Whar- ton was not only a professed atheist, but one of the most abandoned libertines of his day. His personality must have been magnetic, for he had ability akin to genius in securing the allegiance of able young men to the Whig party. As early as 1685, his skill in elections was so great in Buckinghamshire and vicinity that it was said he was directly responsible for the presence of thirty members in parliament. 2 In a later election he is said to have spent £12,000. His influence was greatly reduced by the hostility of the queen, who was scandalized by his indecencies. Less fascinating than Wharton, Lord Somers ranked as one of the greatest constitutional lawyers of his age, and his judicial opinions were always received with re- spect. Despite his well-known weakness for women, 3 Somers was the most satisfactory character in the group, and one of the finest types of his day. He was a sincere patriot, an art connoisseur, and a patron of both litera- ture and art. Moreover, he had more poise and self- command than his associates, and was the only one whose honesty was unquestioned. Unfortunately he had been i Lord, pp. 104-5. 2 Wharton MSS. (Bodl.), IV. 70. See also D. N. B. under "Wharton." a Macky, Memoirs, p. 50. 54 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES a nervous wreck for years, and could not labor very energetically in the political field. Charles Montagu, Earl of Halifax, resembled Somers more than any of the others, as both were interested in art, and did much to encourage talented, but needy, young writers. Montagu had shown sterling qualities as a financier under William, and was mainly responsible for establishing the Bank of England and reforming the cur- rency. His skill was by no means exclusively financial, as he was an eloquent debater and a consummate poli- tician, but his early success had made him so intolerably vain, that the only avenue to his good graces lay through fulsome flattery. Another weakness was his constitu- tional timidity, 1 which caused him to be perpetually seek- ing new political alliances. The weakest link in the Whig chain was unquestionably Sunderland, the son-in-law of the Marlboroughs. Unlike his father, he never learned to dissemble his feelings, and his impulsiveness kept not only his relatives, but the Whig party, continually in embarrassment. He was edu- cated at Utrecht, where he imbibed so much republican- ism that he became the most radical of the Whig leaders and took delight in stirring up trouble. Despite his promises to his father-in-law, Sunderland's attitude was never temperate, and he soon aroused Anne's distrust, which contributed to the failure of some of the most cherished plans of the junto. The least active of the Whig clique was Edward Bus- sell, Earl of Orford. In no sense a politician, he was first and last a sailor. He had always been both arrogant and greedy. At the battle of La Hogue (1692), where he made his reputation, he wavered between loyalty and treason so long that even the French thought he had turned traitor. Despite his haughtiness and malignancy, i Coxe, I. 256; Macaulay, pp. 2394-9. CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 55 his fame and family gave him great prestige, 1 of which his colleagues made the most in elections. Notwithstanding its weaknesses, this group of men organized the Whigs more systematically than ever before. They made the party responsive to discipline, and frequent meetings of the party leaders, as well as of more select groups, determined party policies. Already the junto was improving upon the old methods of compelling members to attend parliament whenever there was urgent need of their presence. 2 Besides these leaders, there were a few more Whigs deserving attention. The proud but mediocre Duke of Somerset was continually wavering in his allegiance to his party. He was the ranking Protestant nobleman, and in the course of his long life took a leading part in the royal ceremonies during six reigns. 3 Under Anne his influence was thrown into the balance at critical moments in support of the junto, with whom he had no personal sympathy whatever. Through the place held by his wife, he was able to get into the good graces of the queen, and divided her confidence with Harley and Mrs. Masham after the downfall of the Marlboroughs. However, he stands, according to Burnet, as a " ministry spoiler, rather than as a ministry maker." 4 A stancher Whig, who stood firmly with his party amid great temptations, was Robert Walpole, but his great opportunity did not come until the next reign. The list of leaders would not be complete without the name of a man who was neither a political leader nor in any real sense an eighteenth- century politician. Yet, in his way, Daniel Defoe in- i Faults on Both Sides, p. 18. Cf. Coxe, I. 259; Macaulay, pp. 2020, 2248. 2 The contests over the election of speaker in December, 3701, and in 1705 show the efficiency of the party "whips." See also Kent, pp. 93-7. a Notes $ Queries (2d series), III. 256. * A. A. Locke, The Seymour Family, p. 165. 56 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES fluenced parliamentary activity indirectly as much as any man in the realm. He was in this reign pre- eminently a political journalist, but he did most efficient service for his superiors in the guise of a secret agent. Such is the list of political notables in 1702. It remains to see how Anne fared in dealing with them in public affairs. She had, however, her own private life as queen, and it is best to ascertain the character of those with whom she associated on confidential terms. Her most intimate companion was her own husband. He was much older than she, but at all times proved himself both kind and affectionate. What was still more wonderful for a courtier who had lived at Charles IPs dissolute court, he was faithful to his marriage vows. But here his list of virtues ends ! He was endowed by nature with a phy- sique which any Viking might have envied, but his in- temperance made him a wreck at fifty. Some things he may have loved, but two he worshiped. One was his wife, the other, his bottle. When Anne became queen, more and more of her time had to be devoted to state affairs, and to solace himself in her absence, George paid most assiduous court to Bacchus. It is pathetic to contemplate his gradual decline, due to his all too frequent indulgence in strong drink. Even in those rare moments when he was entirely free from the influence of brandy, his intel- lectual powers were never considerable. He made few friends, and took little interest in politics, but he was very fond of gossip, 1 much to Anne's chagrin, since she was heartily ashamed of the ridiculous figure he cut at court. Anne could thus expect no aid from the prince ; rather the reverse, as his health soon became such that he de- manded much of the time she should have spent in direct- ing affairs of state. The opinions of Prince George's i Macky, Memoirs, p. 3 ; Burnet, I. 643, V. 391 ; Lingard, Hist, of Eng., X. 353. Schaumann, Gesch. der Erwerberung, pp. 111-2. CONDITIONS IN ENGLAND IN 1702 57 ability given by Charles II and James II are in a way corroborated by William, who scarcely mentions the prince's existence in his correspondence, and other con- temporaries are equally oblivious of his importance. 1 Secondary authorities are even less kind. Ryan writes that he was "enthusiastic only over his bottle," and Paul suggestively remarks that he died, "having perhaps done as little good, and as little harm, as it is possible for a human being to do." 2 The dozen or more children born to the prince and princess tarried but a few hours, or at most a few days, and left Anne sorrowing over their loss. Only one, the idolized Gloucester, lived long enough to brighten her life, but as soon as she began to have visions of him as the future ruler of England, he, too, was snatched away. A few months after his death her father died an exile at the court of the hospitable French king. Her half-brother, the living image of her Gloucester, had become definitely aligned against her through Louis XIV 's recognition of his claims to the English throne. Probably the ablest of all her kin was the Duke of Berwick, the natural son of James II by the sister of Marlborough, since he was a skilful general and an astute diplomat. Unluckily, his services were against the queen and her greatest military commander. Indeed, his successes in Spain against the English caused no small annoyance to both Marlborough and Anne. Though the queen was deserted completely by her father's relatives, she had little more satisfactory relations with her mother's brothers. Clarendon, the eldest, remained a steadfast Jacobite, while Rochester's imperious behavior aroused her deepest resentment. Thus, with all her relatives either hostile or sulking, because they expected greater rewards than she was i The Duchess of Marlborough's Remarks, printed by Eeid, p. 141. 2 H. Paul, Queen Anne, p. 42; Ryan, pp. 138, 193; Wyon, I. 46. 58 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES willing to bestow; with a husband who was a hindrance rather than a help; without children to cheer her, this princess, destined to be the last of the Stuart dynasty, was a lonely, if not an unhappy woman. She needed friends and confidants, supporters and administrators. In seeking both, it is reasonable that she should have continued to depend upon those who had championed her cause before she became queen. CHAPTER II THE QUEEN AND PARLIAMENT (1702-1704) On the evening of March 7, 1702, it was realized that the hours of William III were numbered, and immediately the courtiers began paying assiduous attention to the queen that was to be. Some even of the nobility con- descended to play the role of messenger-boys, carrying to Anne news of her brother-in-law's gradual dissolu- tion. 1 To and fro they scurried between the palace and Anne's apartments, bringing the latest reports of his sinking condition. Meanwhile, William was slowly and painfully breathing his life away. It was a pitiful sight to watch one of the noblest souls of his age pass to the great beyond, because each breath seemed fairly to rend his vitals, as though pierced with the sharpest of swords. Yet William died as bravely as he had lived, 2 and when the gray dawn of that March morning was dissolving into daylight, a new sovereign reigned over the British Isles, the first woman to rule in her own right since Elizabeth. In many respects Anne's position was akin to that of the Virgin Queen a century and a half earlier. Her main duty, it is true, was to reconcile two political, rather than religious, factions ; yet the latter task was not lacking in Anne's reign, as the struggle over occasional conformity i Cunningham, I. 257. Dartmouth's malicious statement that Burnet was the first to salute Anne as queen, is untrue, as younger men were intent upon the same errand. Jersey is said to have sent news every half hour. Other Side, p. 146; Ealph, Hist, of Eng., II. 1623; Eijks Archief, letter from L 'Hermitage to Heinsius, 10 March, 1702. 2 Stepney Papers, Add. MSS., 7070, f. 27, 7074, f. 200; J. Hervey, Diary, 8 March, 1702; S. P. Dom., Anne, I. 1. 60 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES well shows. The problem of the succession was as vital in 1702 as it had been in 1558, and with it was intertwined the whole religious problem as to whether a Catholic could rule in England. The Act of Succession, like the will of Henry VIII, w r as not considered binding by a large part of the people. Elizabeth had succeeded her unpopular sister, while Anne followed William, who was disliked almost as much as "Bloody Mary" had been hated; but here the parallel ceases, as Elizabeth had no such warring factions in her parliament with which to contend as had Anne, factions which were conscious of their power because they had helped remove one sover- eign and make another. The last of the Tudors, too, had the support of a strong Protestant party, while the last of the Stuarts had the opposition of the stronger party, and only the half-hearted support of the weaker. Few reigns in English history are so interesting, and in none is the personal element more significant, on account of the intrigues which made and unmade minis- tries, while Marlborough was winning glorious victories over the French and Godolphin was effecting the union with Scotland. "No period in British history presents . . . such a picture of corruption, venality, unconstitu- tional influences, court intrigues, unbounded ambition in court favorites, and the extended abuse of property and power. . . . It is throughout, ... a scene of artifice and delusions." 1 The reign opened most auspiciously for the new mon- arch. Both houses met promptly after William's death; loyal addresses were voted and an order passed to pro- claim the queen that afternoon. 2 Early in the evening the Privy Council as a body came quietly to Anne's apart- ments to pay her the proper compliments. Her "well- i Hamilton, Transactions, preface. 2 Stepney Papers, Add. MSS., 7070, f . 27. THE QUEEN AND PARLIAMENT 61 considered" reply, though it may have been written by others, shows traces of the queen's influence. Through- out her reign, her attitude towards the Privy Council, parliament, and ministry was more that of a Tudor than a Stuart, since she clearly stated her wishes and then appealed to the loyalty of both parliament and the people to support her. Anne's first speech to both houses shows this. She possessed a beautiful voice, which had been carefully trained. As she pronounced her brief address with grace and fluency, she concluded: "It shall be my constant endeavour, to make you the best returns for that duty and affection you have expressed for me, by a careful and diligent administration for the good of all my subjects; and as I know my own heart to be entirely English, I can sincerely assure you, there is nothing you can expect or desire from me, which I shall not be ready to do for the happiness and prosperity of England; and you will always find me a strict and religious observer of my word." 1 The ubiquitous Burnet said that this conclusion was received with very bad grace by many who saw in it both a reflection upon the late king, and an unpleasant re- minder of her father's first speech to parliament. 2 Marlborough could scarcely have been responsible for either part, especially not the first. With all his faults he was entirely too self-conscious to favor such an attack upon his late master's memory, little as he revered him; and he would have thought such a reference to James II exceedingly tactless. The queen herself could have no such reasons for remaining quiet. She knew how un- popular William had become. If she had in the least doubted it, the unseemly levity of prominent courtiers i Py. Hist., VI. 5. Italics are not in the original. 2 Burnet, V. 3; Chamberlen, pp. 18-9; Coke, III. 132. 62 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES after his death would have speedily convinced her. When William was injured, many Jacobites drank to the health of "Sorrel," whose stumbling had broken the king's collar bone. Some of them, indeed, maintained that the king's death was an instance of divine retribution, since "Sorrel" had belonged to Sir John Fen wick, whom William refused to save from attainder. Even the Privy Council refused the king the honor of a public funeral, and he was quietly buried four days after his death. Fully aware of the king's unpopularity, Anne was anxious to stress the fact that she was English, for she knew that the fundamental reason for the dislike of William lay in his foreign birth, foreign speech, and foreign favorites. 1 Besides, in emphasizing her Stuart blood as that of the hereditary line of English sovereigns, she made a direct appeal for the Jacobite support. More- over, she even quoted their dead monarch's own words as a warrant for their loyalty. That Harley and Godolphin had a part in framing the speech is unquestioned, but some of the sentiments it expressed bear no resemblance to those entertained by either. The appeal to the loyalty of the English is in keeping with Harley 's ideas and the queen's private sentiments, while the closing sentence is the work of a zealous High Church adherent, or even a Jacobite. The i Chamberlen, p. 30; Coke, III. 132. One contemporary poem ran: "Let's e'en mourn on; 'twould lessen much our wo, Had Sorrel stumbled thirteen years ago. ' ' A pamphlet of the time, Gulielmus Bedevivus (1701-2), reads: "In short he was a King, hateful both to God and man ; whatsoever was pleasing to God and good men, that was displeasing to him and his favourites. He died without issue; and was unlamented, for Joy that he left his throne to a Native and Glorious Successor after he had reigned thirteen years." "The longer he was in the country, the less he was beloved," writes an historian. "It may be doubted whether at the time of his decease there was a single Englishman who entertained for him a feeling of personal attachment. ' ' Mahon, I. 39. See also Faults on Both Sides, p. 15. THE QUEEN AND PARLIAMENT 63 evidence points to the Earl of Rochester, 1 whose religious opinions coincided with those of Anne. The sentiments spoken by the queen seem for the most part to have been in consonance with her religious beliefs, which were just as thoroughly English as they were devoutly Anglican. She wished with all her heart to be a popular sovereign, and next to that desire was her ambition to better the condition of the church and broaden its field of influence. She had, besides, a special predilection in favor of her rights as hereditary sovereign. It would appear, then, that Anne had her way as to the contents of her first public address. Others might suggest to her, if they would, the direction of foreign affairs, but she would insist upon having some voice in domestic matters, for she recognized, as probably few men of her time did, how " great a divinity doth hedge a king," or queen, of the Stuart line. "The theory that a king can do no wrong is still a legal fiction," notes one writer, ' ' but in the days of the Stuarts that the king can do no wrong was more than a legal fiction. It was a creed in which the Stuarts were fervent believers. For this faith Charles I died ; for it James II lost his Crown." Anne, though willing to accept the throne from parlia- i A letter of L 'Hermitage to Heinsius concludes : "On impute diverses choses aux Conseils du C[omte] Eoch [ester] qui ne sont pas goutee, de bien des gens, et qui sont connoistre a ce qu'on pretend son caractere. C'est luy qui fit mettre dans la l ce harangue de la Eeine le mot du Coeur entiere- ment Anglois. . . . Marlborough ne fut pas de cet avis, et les dues de Devon- shire et de Somerset, et le Comte de Carlisle oposerent fort faisant voir combien cela reflechissoit sur la memoire du R[oi] et que ce n'estoit propre qu'a cause de la division mais la R[eine] voulu deferer aux avis de son oncle. " Rijks Archief, 26A. The rest of the letter is in L 'Hermitage's illegible hand, but this part is the work of a secretary. It is improbable that Anne wrote the address herself, as it was not customary. Even William apologized for drawing up his own speech. Py. Hist., V. 403. The Duke of Somerset was responsible for the part of her speech relating to Scotland. See Marlb. MSS., p. 53. 64 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES ment, 1 nevertheless remained a thorough believer in hereditary right. Moreover, she appreciated the force of the Jacobite sentiment which demanded that the Pre- tender should succeed her, and she grew cold at the mention of the foreign princess whom parliament had designated as her successor. There was magic in the name of Stuart, as no royal house in England "ever inspired such enthusiastic loyalty, such passionate love. . . . For no other princes was blood so generously poured forth. . . . The indignant pity bestowed upon Louis XVI and his queen is a poor, cold thing, beside a deathless devotion to the Queen of Scots, the reverential loyalty to Charles I. These emotions surely spring not from mere ideas, they rise out of the remarkable personalities, and the 'sense of tears in human life.' " 2 After making proper allowance for the natural bias of a Scot for the Stuarts, there still remains a large amount of truth in this statement. Not alone for Charles I did English gentlemen cheerfully sacrifice their all, but for his sons and grandsons as well. After the exile of James II, even after the fatal battle of the Boyne, a large num- ber of men and women continued to look forward to the day when the "King over the Water" might return as their constitutional ruler. "When he died, they gave their loyal support to his son in the expedition of 1708, as well as in the rebellion of 1715, which sought to place James Edward upon the English throne. Undismayed at his failure and moral degradation, the Jacobites made a last despairing effort at Culloden to secure the British crown for ' ' Bonny Prince Charlie. ' ' i A fair statement of the position of the moderate Whigs and Tories is set forth in Faults on Both Sides, p. 47. "We know that the queen has both an hereditary and parliamentary title, but without the latter, she had not now so happily filled the throne. ' ' 2 Shield and Lang, The King Over the Water, pp. 2-3 ; Kent, p. 16. THE QUEEN AND PARLIAMENT 65 The queen was prepared at all times to make the most of this unquestioned loyalty and she was encouraged by the manifestation of universal joy at her accession, which was probably never equalled except in 1660. 1 In her first speech to parliament she made an open appeal for the sympathy and support of the people, while she also clearly stated that she stood for the Protestant succes- sion, for a vigorous prosecution of the war, and for the union with Scotland. The problem of the succession touched her in a manner peculiarly personal. There had been a time when it was thought Anne might marry George Louis, now Elector of Hanover; but the attitude of the young Hanoverian prince was unfavorable, and William of Orange opposed the match. 2 Since that time there had been little cordiality between Princess Anne and the elector, a feeling very much accentuated by the open scandal in the latter 's marital relations which thoroughly disgusted Anne, who in her day must have been considered a prude. Even worse than this, in the queen's eyes, were the elector's Low Church sympathies, which aroused her fears for the church in case he should ever rule England. Probably most disturbing of all, to her, was the fact that her own half-brother was the legitimate heir to the throne. To a change in the law of succession whereby the Pretender might succeed her, Anne doubtless would have consented, had he not been a Catholic. His faith was not only a powerful objection in her mind, which rarely looked, in religious matters, beyond the immediate welfare of the Established Church, but it was also a most practical obstacle to his favorable reception by the masses. The difficulties of having a straightforward policy i T. Salmon, Mod. Hist., XXV. 1. 2 Monmouth and Danby also opposed the marriage. Eyan, I. 73-6. 66 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES were accentuated by the fact that a large portion of the people fully expected James Edward, having renounced Catholicism, to succeed Anne. This party was both large and influential, and had to be conciliated, if the Tories were to remain in power. All plans for accomplishing this purpose were much to the liking of the queen, who desired the continuance of Tory supremacy. 1 The war was inextricably mixed up with the succes- sion and the fate of the Pretender, whose recognition by Louis XIV precipitated England into the conflict. The real object of the French monarch in thus consoling the dying moments of the royal exile still remains in doubt, but there was no question in the minds of the English people that, in case he was successful in the war, Louis intended to impose James Edward and Catholicism upon England. 2 It would certainly have been a dark day for England had not the queen's inherent English antipathy for France in general and for the French monarch in particular, urged her to wage a war to curb the rest- less ambition of the greatest European monarch since Charles V. Foreign war was complicated by the peculiar position of Scotland, which was lukewarm at times in its opposi- tion to France. Since Elizabeth's death, England and Scotland had been governed by one sovereign and two legislative bodies. Trouble inevitably resulted from this peculiar relation, and the situation was especially critical i Mahon, I. 10, 37; Macaulay, Essay on Addison; Py. Hist., VI. 1. 2 The Life and Reign of her late Excellent Majesty, Queen Anne, p. 27. There were numerous royal addresses, many of which appear to have been inspired by the court. One from the North Eiding, December 20, 1701, reads : " It is plain that there is no faith to be kept with that monarch, and we doubt not it was done to put new life into a Party mourning for their deceased abdicated king, and lay a foundation for fresh and lasting troubles in these kingdoms." Vox Populi (1701). See also Luttrell, V. 91, sq. ; James, III. 158 ; W. Michael, Eng. Gesch., I. 229. THE QUEEN AND PARLIAMENT 67 at Anne's accession, because the rapid growth of trade, and the unsuccessful attempt of the Scots to settle Darien had accentuated the rivalry of the two nations, already sufficiently exasperated on account of the differences in race, religion, and habits. Under such trying conditions, a parliamentary union was essential to the continued welfare of each country, but whether it could be accom- plished by compromise or only by conquering the north- ern kingdom, was problematical. Indeed, from the peculiar temperament of the Scot and the mutual hatred felt by both races, conquest would seem the more probable method. At this juncture, it was indeed a happy omen for both kingdoms that the new sovereign represented the Scottish house of Stuart, and displayed great interest in promoting negotiations for the union. With three such important points of policy as the war, the union, and the Act of Settlement to carry out, there was urgent need of an efficient administration. If Anne was to govern, she must build up a faction to support her. This she attempted in some degree to do, but her policy disappointed both parties alike. 1 Because of her reli- gious sympathies, the Tories expected to gain complete control of the government, an expectation the more prob- able as Rochester was the leader of the High Church faction. The Jacobites and non-jurors felt that she would make possible the restoration of the hereditary line, at least after her death. On the other hand, the Whigs expected recognition because they were the fore- most supporters of the Protestant succession and of the war against Louis. Contrary to the expectations of the zealous Tories, Anne made no great or sudden changes in the ministry. In compliance with statute law, parliament would sit for i Nottingham Papers, Add. MSS., 29588, f. 488; Macpherson, I. 636; Oldmixon, II. 148; Salomon, p. 10; Locl'hart Fapers, I. 315. 68 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES six months after her accession; possibly the queen or her advisers thought it would be well to test the temper of the people towards their new sovereign before making any considerable alterations. In the meantime, Anne began rewarding personal friends, displaying through- out a steady determination to have her own way. Almost immediately, she nominated her husband generalissimo of the forces, as well as lord high admiral. She even intimated that she would not continue the war against France unless he were made commander-in-chief of all the allied forces. 1 Indeed, she gave way only after the Dutch made it clear that they would never consent to such an arrangement, inasmuch as the prince possessed scarcely a single qualification for the place. 2 Although her first desire was to honor her husband, she was also anxious to reward intimate acquaintances. Before five days had passed, she had dispatched Marl- borough, the husband of her bosom friend, to Holland as "Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary" to assure the Dutch of her co-operation in the Grand Alli- ance. On the same day, Marlborough was also honored with the Garter, and the following day he was made captain general. 3 The year had not yet closed before the queen created him a duke, and bestowed an enormous pension upon him, which caused old John Evelyn to grumble about the avarice of the Marlboroughs. 4 Lady Marlborough was the queen's dearest friend, and was at once rewarded. Not only was she made groom of the stole, mistress of the robes, and keeper of the privy purse, but she received in addition, the rangership of Windsor i L 'Hermitage to Heinsius, March 10, 1702, Eijks Archief, 26 A ; Cun- ningham, I. 264. 2 Marlborough's letter to Heinsius, April 27, 1702, urged the appointment. Eijks Archief, 26 A . See also Von Noorden, I. 204. s James, III. 198; Luttrell, V. 152; Annals, I. 12. 4 Diary (1827), III. 397. THE QUEEN AND PARLIAMENT 69 Park, for which she had expressed a desire years before. Anne had already bestowed substantial wedding gifts upon each of the duchess's daughters, and at her acces- sion, appointed two of them ladies of the bedchamber. 1 Other friends were not forgotten. The Marquis of Normanby had paid court to Lady Anne while she was still in her teens and would gladly have married her. Her father and her uncle, Charles II, made it clear to the presumptuous young noble that he was no match for the king's niece, who might sometime be queen. During the passing years, Normanby had retained Anne's friend- ship and was one of the first to welcome her as the new sovereign. His compensation was prompt; almost at once, he was made lord privy seal and shortly after- wards, Duke of Buckingham. 2 Zealous High Churchmen, similarly rewarded because they were personally accept- able to the queen, were Dr. Hooper, Nottingham, who was appointed secretary of state, 3 and Seymour, who, much to his disappointment, received only the comp- trollership of the household, 4 succeeding Wharton, whom Anne disliked on account of his profanity, atheism, and extreme licentiousness. While her memory for her friends was excellent, she did not forget her political and personal enemies. In fact, she saw to it that Wharton's staff was taken from him and given to his successor before his face. Almost i Anglice Notitia (1704), p. 523. 2 Stepney Papers, Add. MSS., 7076, f. 168; Burnet, V. 10. »Cal. Tr. Papers (1702-7), 18 May, 1702. For a time, the report was that he would be selected as lord chancellor. L 'Hermitage's letter to Hein- sius, Rijks Archief, 26 A . Nottingham had favored Anne in her fight in 1688 to secure a special grant from parliament. Kennett, History, III. 547. * Rijks Archief, 26^. Stepney Papers, Add. MSS., 7074, f. 117. He accepted the place to keep out a Whig. Leadam says that Seymour was appointed through the influence of his wife. Polit. Hist., p. 3. See also Stepney Papers, Add. MS3., 7070, f. 55. 70 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES immediately, his name, as well as those of Somers and Halifax, was stricken from the list of the Privy Council, because they were obnoxious to the queen. 1 The Earl of Macclesfield, after the Rye House Plot, had accused her father of being responsible for the suicide of the Earl of Essex. This had grieved Anne very much, and upon her accession, he was deprived of all his offices. 2 Still others lost their places as they met with her displeasure. These appointments and dismissals tended to make her secure with the Tory leaders, but most unpopular abroad. 3 This feeling did not in the least check the queen, for her policy was first of all to become popular at home. Another step gained her party political power where it was most needed — in the House of Lords. After the Revolution, William created such a goodly number of Whig peers, that the Tories found abundant cause for complaint in the attitude of the upper house. 4 Partly to silence the grumbling of the Tories in the Commons and partly to increase her own power over legislation, Anne created five new peers in 1703. 5 Even here, the influence i Wharton MSS. (Bodl.), IV. 21» The report was current that Anne struck out Wharton 's name with her own hand. See Macky, Memoirs, p. 23. By the beginning of 1704, Wharton's name is again found in the list of the council. P. 0. Reg., LXXX. i, 1. Cf. ib., LXXIX. 32. See also Chamberlen, p. 23 ; Acts Privy Council, Col. V. 660, 662, 665. 2 Strickland, XI 216. Notes # Queries (3d series), VIII. 66-7, says that Macclesfield died 5 Nov., 1701, but Luttrell gives the date as 29 Dec, 1702. Brief Relation, V. 251. s Eijks Archief, 26 A . The Dutch objected in particular to Buckingham. 4 It was not the creations of the king which changed the political com- plexion of the House of Lords of 1688. It is true that he created thirty peers, but four were Tories, and seven others were eldest sons who were called up to the Lords. William's additions helped, but the change in the attitude of the bishops and the absence of Jacobites and non-jurors were the factors mainly responsible. A. S. Turberville, House of Lords in the Reign of William III, p. 14. s Luttrell, V. 275-6; see Leadam, p. 35. THE QUEEN AND PAKLIAMENT 71 of the personal element is evident, since she was pre- vailed upon not only to ennoble four violent Tories but one steadfast Whig as well, because he was a friend of the Duchess of Marlborough. 1 The four new Tory crea- tions, and to a less extent, the promotion of Buckingham, were due to political reasons. Nothing has ever been made of this precedent. It is really surprising that so much is made of the dozen creations in 1711 and so little of the making of the five in 1703, when the purpose in each case was identical — to destroy the "Whig power in the House of Lords, or, to be more accurate, to give the j Tories a working majority there. 2 The queen was no more considerate of the Whig min- istry left her by William. Nor could she be expected to entertain a decided reverence for the late king's memory, his policies, or his advisers. Not a few of his supporters had given umbrage, either through their attitude towards her or by their activity against her father, while some of William's opponents had earned her gratitude by their \| factious opposition. To Anne's way of thinking, those who had snubbed her in former days must be punished, and her faithful adherents must be rewarded. Although such changes as she made were gradual, their bearing upon politics, both foreign and domestic, was very direct. The selection of Nottingham and Seymour, two of the leading Tory zealots, had gained her assist- ance in quarters where William had been most unpopular. Sir Charles Hedges was made the other secretary of state, partly, it may be surmised, because he had been dismissed by William, but more largely, it would appear, because Nottingham refused to serve without him. 3 i Conduct, pp. 297-300. 2 "Great reflections were made upon this promotion." Burnet, V. 66. 3 "The Tories would trust none but Nottingham, and he would serve with none but Hedges." Burnet, V. 10. Additional information may be found 72 ENGLISH POLITICAL PASTIES Jersey was given the place of lord chamberlain, although he was strongly suspected of Jacobite sentiments, as was Ormond, who became master of horse. 1 The most important appointment made by the queen at this time was that of Godolphin as lord high treasurer. He was a lifelong friend, to whom she had been under the deepest obligations for making a satisfactory settle- ment of her debts while she was still a princess. His ability as a financier, moreover, was well known, and Marlborough informed the queen that England could endure the financial burdens of the war, only if Godol- phin were given control of the exchequer. 2 These two facts, added to his friendship for the queen, account for his selection as her financial adviser and as the real leader in the ministry itself ; yet it is doubtful if the Marl- boroughs could have dictated her choice of first minister, had it not been along the line of her own inclinations. 3 Soon after this, Godolphin was honored with an earldom. Godolphin 's appointment greatly disappointed Roch- ester, who, as the Tory leader, had fully expected this office from his niece. 4 She, however, was by no means in full sympathy with him, because of his earlier attitude toward her. Yet she was unwilling to punish him, if he were really loyal. At the close of William's reign, he had been recalled as lord lieutenant of Ireland, but the necessary legal papers had not been made out. As a result, one of Anne's first acts was to continue him as the head of Irish affairs and as a member of the Privy on this point in Stepney Papers, Add. MSS., 7070, f. 55, 7074, f. 123; Rijks Archief, 26A. i Stepney Papers, 7070, f. 109; John Hervey, Letter Books, I. 161-2. 2 Godolphin was reluctant to accept the responsibilities of office until Marlborough convinced him that his services were indispensable. See I. S. Leadam, "The Finance of Godolphin," Trans. R. H. S. (3d series), vol. IV. 3 H. Elliot, Godolphin, pp. 194-5; Thomson, I. 324-5. 4 Rijks Archief, 26^. THE QUEEN AND PARLIAMENT 73 Council. 1 Clarendon, his elder brother, was more un- compromising in his demeanor and steadily refused to take the oath of allegiance to Anne, as he had done in the case of William. When he came to court, the queen refused to see him, and he was informed that he was persona non grata until he had taken the proper oaths. He continued obstinate, however, and retired sorrowfully from AYestminster. Despite all this, Anne did not forget that he was her uncle, and in a short time bestowed upon him a pension of £1,500. 2 The queen made other important changes. "The Earl of Abingdon, Viscount Weymouth, Lord Dartmouth, . . . Grenville, Howe, . . . Gower, Harcourt, with several others who had, during the last reign, expressed the most violent and unrelenting aversion to the whole adminis- tration were now brought to the council board, and put in good posts." 3 This new ministry was in most in-\ stances the personal choice of the queen and reflects her decided preference for the High Church Tories. How-/ ever, they could not hope that the Whig parliament/ elected late in 1701 would carry out their policies ; so the j Tory leaders were compelled to turn their attentions to winning the election of 1702. In the meantime, the queen had taken steps to increase her personal popularity. Ten days after her accession, parliament voted Anne the same civil list as they had i P. C. Beg., LXXIX. 36; Stepney Papers, Add. MSS., 7074, f. 103; Von Noorden, I. 193; Luttrell, V. 154; Cal. S. P. Bom. (1702-3), p. 402. Two days later it was reported that he was to be raised to a duke. Luttrell, V. 155. 2 Coke, III. 127; Luttrell, V. 282. 3 Burnet, V. 10; Cal. S. P. Bom. (1702-3), p. 389. "Jack" Howe's only claim to preference seems to have been his indecent hostility to William III. B. N. B., art. "Howe." See also Bouse of Lords MSS. (n. s.), VI. xl. Portland and Bentinck were also summarily dismissed from all their employ- ments. Byan, pp. 389-92. 74 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES William. 1 To gain the affections of her people, she agreed to apply for £700,000 in order to have the opportunity of publicly and ostentatiously bestowing a large part of it for the administration of public affairs. It is obvious that she might have accomplished the same financial pur- pose in a more modest manner by making it known that £600,000 would have been sufficient for her needs. 2 Such a method, however, did not suit Anne, for it was not her primary aim, it seems, to bring pecuniary aid to an embarrassed government, but to gain public applause for herself. Her address to the Commons, upon giving her assent to the revenue bills, reads like a special appeal. She said in part: "I return to you my kind and hearty thanks, for continuing to me, for my life, the same revenue you had granted to the king: I will take great care that it shall be managed to the best advantage ; and while my subjects remain under the burthen of such great taxes, I will straiten myself . . . , rather than not con- tribute all I can to their ease and relief, with a just regard to . . . the honor and dignity of the Crown. It is prob- able that the revenue may fall very short of what it has formerly produced, however I will give directions that £100,000 be applied to the public service, in this year, out of the revenues, you have so unanimously given me." 3 Such a move could scarcely have been inspired by the penurious Marlborough, or the serious Godolphin, who never fully appreciated the force of public sentiment. It sounds far more like the work of Anne herself than that of either of them. The effect was exactly what she i Stepney Papers, Add. MSS., 7078, f. 76. 2 A feeling prevailed that £700,000 was too much for a queen, as her expenses would be less than those of an active king. Cf. Wyon, I. 60. 3 Py. Hist., VI. 11. George V has done the same when his civil list is £230,000 less. N. Y. Times, 3 April, 1916. In spite of her grant, Anne's civil expenses were greater than William's. Add. MSS., 30201, ff. 39-81. THE QUEEN AND PARLIAMENT 75 anticipated, as this portion of her speech "was received with great applause, and particular notice was taken of it in all the addresses that came up afterward." 1 Anne cared little for money, so when she felt the public pulse and found it did not respond properly to the large civil list which had been granted, she chose to give way gra- ciously to this sentiment and gain popular favor. Anne spoke on this occasion to the entire nation, but there were others of her actions that were more special in their appeal. There is space here to mention but one. She felt acutely the extent to which the scandalous posi- tion of the lower clergy reflected upon the church, for they were little higher socially than the poorest peasant or day laborer ; their training was slight, and their com- pensation slighter, often as little as £5 per annum. 2 Since the time of Henry VIII, it had been the prerogative of the crown to enjoy the ' ' first-fruits and tenths ' ' 3 from all ecclesiastical benefices. This would have been an onerous burden upon the poorer clergy had the first fruits and tenths not followed the trend of all similar English taxes, and become fixed at £17,000. 4 Even then, this tax was felt as an injustice by the clergy, so the queen sought to curry favor with the High Church clergy and their parishioners by setting the tax aside as a fund for the poor clergy. This gained her the loyal support of the lower clergy, which she never lost, although her donation failed completely to give the needy parish priests any immediate relief. 5 Altogether, her address and the i Burnet, V. 4; Luttrell, V. 158; Stepney Papers, Add. MSS., 7074, f. 117. 2 Henry Wharton, Defense of Pluralities, p. 185; Ashton, Social Life, II. 129. 3 "First-fruits" were the whole of the first year's revenue, and "tenths" one-tenth of the annual income thereafter. * Burnet, V. 120; House of Lords MSS. (n. s.), V. 558. 5 It is today, however, of considerable aid to poor curates. Clarke and Foxcroft, Burnet, p. 408. Details of the administration of Queen Anne's 76 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES gracious reply of the Commons to the same 1 seem like other examples of her desire to curry popular favor. While the queen was endeavoring to increase her popu- larity, both political parties were preparing for the elections, which bore little resemblance to those of today. Since 1702, the whole idea of representation has changed, a new basis for suffrage has been found, and an entirely different method of expressing political preferences adopted. The present qualifications for voting in parlia- mentary elections are simple indeed compared with those existing before 1832. Mr. Porritt's researches brought him to the conclusion that English boroughs possessed over eighty different qualifications for voting for mem- bers of parliament. 2 In some, all the freemen voted; in others, all those paying scot and lot ; in still others, those who could prove their maintenance of a separate house- hold — the so-called "potwallopers"; while in a fourth type, the franchise was restricted to the corporation, which constantly tended to become more exclusive. Other boroughs had electoral qualifications too numerous and technical to mention. The great industrial cities of a century later had not yet come into existence, and nothing comparable to the inequalities revealed by Charles Grey in 1793 are to be found. Nevertheless, con- ditions were bad enough when Cornish boroughs sent forty-two members to Westminster, and London but four ; when a deer park at Gatton sent as many members to parliament as the thriving cities of Westminster or Bristol; when East Looe and West Looe returned as many members as did the two great counties of York- shire and Devonshire, or even the metropolis, which had Bounty are given in the Eighth Report of the Hist. MSS. Com., and in C. Hodgson, An Account of the Augmentation of Small Livings. i Py. Hist., VI. 328-30. See also H. M. Gwatkin, Church and State in England, p. 390. 2 E. Porritt, The Unreformed House of Commons, I. ch. iii. THE QUEEN AND PARLIAMENT 77 two hundred times the population and a thousand times the wealth of those insignificant little villages. 1 The franchise was systematic or uniform only in the counties, where, since the fifteenth century, all forty- shilling freeholders voted for knights of the shire. Even here, however, the real intent of the law was nullified, since forty shillings in 1700 was by no means the same as it had been in the reign of Edward V, when land was the leading, almost the only, source of wealth. Although the county franchise was more liberal than that of the average borough, it was by no means broadly represent- ative of the popular will, because the influence of the landed gentry was predominant, and because all English countries, whatever their population, elected but two members. There was just as great a variation from present-day conditions in the conduct of elections. Sometimes the elections dragged on forty days, reaching a grand climax on the final day. Bribery and trickery were both easy and possible. Voting was viva voce, and an elector was practically at the mercy of his political opponents, who, all too frequently, were incited to violence by their lead- ers, by whom ale was plentifully supplied at the expense of the candidates. It took real courage to cast an honest vote in the face of a hostile majority, who delighted in rioting on the slightest provocation, and whose methods were anything but gentle once their blood was up. Even under such adverse conditions, it is surprising how fre- quently electors did express their choice for parliament. The game of the politician of the early eighteenth cen- tury had scarcely begun at the conclusion of the poll. If a member not to the liking of the party leaders was re- turned, the result might be changed by means of a con- iMacaulay, p. 2287; Py. Hist., XIII. 90. See as well, John Locke, Essay on Civil Government, Bk. II., eh. xiii. 78 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES troverted election petition, which would nullify the expressed will of the constituency, in case the working majority of the party were sufficient. Where it was im- possible, however, to find excuse for a double return, the leaders were obliged to accept the member elected, who, unless his honesty was far above the average, was easily made amenable to party discipline by receiving an office of "honor and profit" under the crown. If he were minded to decrease the revenues, he was granted a sinecure where his income depended upon the amount of money which was appropriated and passed through the treasury. If he hungered after social honors, obedience might bring him a baronetcy or even a peerage, while important nobles in his party flattered him with their attentions. 1 The ministry, and frequently even the sovereign in person, took a part in the canvass, which at times amounted to absolute bribery. Such was the situa- tion under William and we must now ascertain whether any changes occurred in the conduct of elections under Anne. As soon as it was legally possible, the queen issued writs for a new parliament, and the contest was on. The new ministry was Tory, but it was soon apparent that its members were not united in their efforts, as only a bare majority desired a decisive victory for the Tories and worked enthusiastically towards that end. 2 On account of such divided counsels, it has never been entirely clear what part Anne played in this and succeeding elections. One authority believes that she was the first sovereign who ceased to meddle in elections. 3 Such a statement is in perfect accord with the usual conception of the queen, i Faults on Both Sides, p. 20; Lecky, I. 435; House of Lords MSS. (n. s.), V. 559. 2 The Marlboroughs and Godolphin, and particularly the duchess, feared the effect upon the war if the Tories grew too strong. 3 E. Porritt, Unreformed House of Commons, I. 407. THE QUEEN AND PARLIAMENT 79 and if it refers only to her personal work, it is doubtless true. Being a woman, she could not be as active as a man in political affairs in the early eighteenth century, how- ever much she may have desired to go on an electioneer- ing tour as had her immediate predecessor. 1 Yet it is a fundamental error to imagine Anne as being entirely passive in elections. The concluding sentence of her address to parliament in closing the session is an exhortation to all High Church adherents. "I shall be very careful to preserve and maintain the Act of Tolera- tion, and to set the minds of all my people at quiet; my own principles must keep me entirely firm to the interests and religion of the Church of England, and will incline me to countenance those which have the truest zeal to support it." 2 The activity of the court in the election may, in the main, be justly assumed as an expression of the sovereign's attitude. Of this work we are left in no doubt, as two contempo- raries so far agree with a third as to quote him verbatim. The election resulted as it did "owing to the countenance and encouragement receiv'd from the Court." 3 "The Queen," observed Burnet, "did not openly interpose in the elections, but her informations to the Tories appear- ing plainly, all people took it for granted that she wished they might be in the majority; this wrought on the incon- stancy and servility that is natural to multitudes." According to Archdeacon Coxe, "The Tories, by the influence of the Crown and their own exertions, secured a considerable majority." 4 i Women began to take considerable interest in politics. The duchess, Lady Montagu, Mrs. Masham, Mary Astell, and the Duchess of Somerset were only the most prominent. Hervey, Letter Books, I. passim; Eemusat, I. 149; Ashton, Social Life, I. 171. See also Journal to Stella. 2 Py. Hist., VI. 25. sBoyer, p. 32; Oldmixon, Hist, of Eng., IV. 292; Chamberlen, p. 59. 4 Coxe, I. 101; Coxe Papers, XV. 23. Interesting information on this 80 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAKTIES To be efficacious, it is not essential that political in- fluence be exerted directly. One method by which the court exercised pressure indirectly was through the clergy. Anne's popularity among them was already large, because she was such a zealous High Church advo- cate. Thus the lower clergy were strongly on the Tory side, and as political campaigners in the rural areas, they were in a class by themselves, so that the outcome of the election may be attributed largely to the queen's popu- larity and the interest of the clergy. 1 Burnet gives more influence to the weight of taxation, which drove all but the commercial classes towards the Tories. The latter, moreover, had come out openly in favor of the war, 2 taking away from the Whigs their trump card with which they had planned to win the election. Not all the ministers were willing to follow the example of the Marlboroughs and allow the election to take care of itself. Nottingham worked every possible moment for the Tories. Nowhere is this so clear as in the case of "Jack" Howe, the vociferous, irrepressible member who had formerly represented Gloucestershire, but had been defeated in the previous election by a close vote. Al- though fearing the strength of the Whigs in his home county, the Tories felt it a duty to secure his election. Consequently, they placed him in nomination in Glouces- tershire, Gloucester City, and Newton in Lancashire. He was elected for the county, despite the attempts of the election may be found in Nottingham Papers, Add. MSS., 29588, f. 102, Ellis Papers, Add. MSS., 28889, f. 36. i Leadam, 25. The Newcastle Papers (Add. MSS., 32686, f. 4) describe the attitude of some of the clergy. Archbishop Sharp refused to use his influence in the election, even at the kindly suggestion of Lady Eussell. Sharp, I. 122-4. His great interest is manifest in his letter in the Hatton- Finch Papers, Add. MSS., 29584, ff. 93-4. 2 House of Lords MSS. (n. s.), V. vi; Wyon, I. 128; Py. Hist., VI. 40. THE QUEEN AND PAELIAMENT 81 Whigs to "vote" a number of vagabonds through the influence of a large and noisy mob. 1 Although Nottingham's main interest may have been in securing Howe's election, he was doing his utmost in other places. At the polls for Northamptonshire and for Higham Ferrers his representatives were most active, 2 while they were exceptionally alert in the elections in the Cinque Ports. 3 At Norwich, his agent was Humphrey Prideaux, who boasted that the success of the Tory candi- date was due to his own unaided efforts. 4 In Sussex, in Lancashire, and in Leicestershire, the "dismal" Secre- tary was planning to overthrow the Whigs, 5 and in many cases he succeeded. In Cheshire, in particular, the Tories rejoiced because they had the "greatest poll that ever was in this county in the memory of man, and being carried by such a majority is a great addition to our joy." G In Yorkshire, Liverpool, Coventry, Maidstone, and Stamford, Nottingham's agents were found diligently engaged. 7 In the west and southwest of England he had the able co-operation of Sir Edward Seymour, who labored incessantly against the Whigs with their com- mercial instincts and Low Church proclivities. Even thus early in the reign, Seymour displayed considerable animus against Marlborough and Godolphin, which i Nottingham Papers, Add. MSS., 29588, ff. 78, 140. On the face of the returns Sir John Guise had twenty-four majority, but in the contest they counted only freeholders and Howe won by 122. Stepney Papers, Add. MSS., 7076, f. 81. See also C. J., XIV. 6. 2 Hatton-Finch Papers, Add. MSS., 29568, f. 114. See also the Earl of Winchelsea and Nottingham MSS. (H. M. C), pp. 23-5. 3 Nottingham Papers, Add. MSS., 29588, ff. 93, 102-4. * lb., f. 115. s lb., ff. 70, 117. e lb., f. 122. ? Hatton-Finch Papers, Add. MSS., 29584, f . 94 ; Nottingham Papers, Add. MSS., 29588, ff. 86, 93, 104-6, 117, 129. 82 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES probably did much to increase bis industry. 1 Sir Chris- topher Musgrave, Viscount Hatton, and Lord Weymouth also were enthusiastically devoted to High Church in- terests and worked in conjunction with both Nottingham and Seymour. 2 Thomas Coke, as well, was active in this canvass for a "true Church of England Parliament." 3 His main interest lay in Derby and Leicester. John Ellis, assistant secretary of state, was another who was absorbed in the details of the election. 4 Whig politicians were busy earlier than usual in this section, but the Tories more than held their own in the pollings. Although there was the usual amount of treating and trickery, 5 the complaints are much less common than in the previous elections. Throughout the realm the poll- ings were nevertheless very spirited and rioting was not uncommon. 6 The results were probably closer than they had been ten months before, although it is difficult to obtain satisfactory data. 7 With a slight majority on the face of the returns, it was easy for the Tories, by their decisions in contro- verted elections, to increase their margin until it was perfectly safe, although the Last Determinations Act of 1696 presented some obstacles. They contested the elec- tions so openly as to show that the "party was resolv'd i Nottingham Papers, Add. MSS., 29588, f. 79. 2 lb., ff. 39, 47, 103, 115, 125; Portl. MSS., IV. 42-4. s Coke MSS., III. 14. See also ib., III. 3-34, passim. * Ellis Papers, Add MSS., 28889, ff. 36-40; ib., Add. MSS., 28890, f. 337. s C. J., XIV. 6, 12, 149; XV. 37. Coke provided "three runlets of ale" for his constituents, and was asked to procure a ' ' patent for a free school. ' ' Coke MSS., III. 5-7. «C. J., XIV. 6-13; Morrison MSS. (H. M. C), p. 465; Coxe Papers, XV. 23; Luttrell, V. 159; Wilson, Defoe, II. 14. t Carte MSS. (Bodl.), CXXIX. 427, 441. Vryberge's letter to Heinsius, 19 August, 1702, is found in Kijks Archief, 26-*-. See also Luttrell, V. 192- 205. As soon as the pollings were over in England, Seafield, Secretary of State for Scotland, hurried away to his post to influence the elections there. Boyer, p. 53. THE QUEEN AND PARLIAMENT 83 on anything that might serve their ends," 1 and "that they rather chose themselves than that they were chosen by the people," so that the Commons were "more in the interest of the ministers than that of their sovereign or country." 2 At least thirty elections were violently con- tested. The poll at Hindon was proven notoriously corrupt; 3 by hook or crook, John Howe was seated from Gloucestershire. The ministry had its way at East Ret- ford, 4 as well as at other places, where "the most bare- faced partiality was discovered . . . in . . . decisions upon controverted elections." 5 Before these elections could be brought before the lower house, the latter had to organize. Meeting late in the year after repeated prorogations, the Commons immediately proceeded unanimously to re-elect Harley as speaker, since both Whigs and Tories had so much respect for his ability as to prefer him to all other candi- dates. Thus, by means direct and indirect, through the pollings, the election of a speaker of their own persuasion, and the controverted election petitions, the Tories gained a working majority in the Commons. 7 The High Church attitude of the commoners coincided with Anne's own desire, and she was now able to remodel her ministry to suit her own wishes. Had the plans of such men as Roch- ester, Nottingham, Seymour, and Howe been either mod- erate or well considered, they might have secured their i Burnet, V. 48 and Note. 2 Oldfield, Pari. Hist., p. 376. He makes the usual error of separating the queen from her ministers, when their policy was the same — ardently Tory. s House of Lords MSS. (n. s.), V. Intro., xvii; ib., 202; Burnet, V. 46; C. J., XIV. 13, 48. 4 Stepney Papers, Add. MSS., 7078, ff. 76, 181; C. J., XIV. 49-51. The Commons spent a great amount of time upon these elections. s Wilson, Defoe, II. 14. e Stepney Papers, Add. MSS., 7076, f. 165; Cunningham, I. 311. 7 Nottingham Papers, Add. MSS., 29588, ff. 39, 40, 47, 79; Ellis Papers, Add. MSS., 28890, f. 337. 84 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES aims with little difficulty, but reasonableness and tact were wofully lacking in this group, and impetuosity and desire for revenge soon got them into considerable diffi- culties : first, with their constituencies ; then, with the House of Lords ; and last of all, with the queen. Anne's speech to both houses in opening the new ses- sion resembled her previous addresses. She called atten- tion to the shortage in the revenues, despite the £100,000 "I promised to the last parliament," which had not been sufficient to supply the " deficiency. ' ' Lastly, she made the usual bid for public support, particularly for that of the devoted Anglicans : "And as I am resolved," she said, "to defend and maintain the church as by law established, and to protect you in full enjoyment of your rights and liberties; so I rely upon your care to me." 1 The rough draft of this speech was thoroughly dis- cussed by various members of the ministry. Nottingham apparently had much less to do with its preparation 2 than with the address the queen had delivered in dissolving parliament in July. The preliminary copy of it seems to have been drawn up by Godolphin and Anne, and sent to the speaker for corrections and suggestions. 3 The document was returned over a week later to Godolphin, as requested. It is more than probable that the draft of the speech was sent to Harley with the queen's knowl- edge, and possibly even at her suggestion, since more than nine weeks before, he had begun his secret visits to the queen, who soon became very fond of him. This new parliament faced a serious foreign war with Louis XIV to decide the questions of colonial and dynastic i Py. Hist., VI. 47. 2 Nottingham Papers, Add MSS., 29588, f. 356; Cal. S. P. Dom., 1702-3, p. 164; S. P. Dom., Entry Bk., CIV. 67. sPortl. MSS., IV. 47-8. "The Queen appoints half after five tomorrow at her backstairs. You will please send in your name. ' ' Godolphin 's letter to Harley, July 7, 1702, Portl. MSS., IV. 43. THE QUEEN AND PARLIAMENT 85 supremacy. The matters relative to the war were party quarrels rather than disputes between the two houses. The Tories, in the main, had not been anxious for Eng- land to enter the land war as a principal, feeling that she had fewer reasons for active war against Louis XIV than had either Holland or the Empire. The Highfliers, in particular, held this view and it seems to have been the fundamental difficulty which brought on their conflict with Marlborough, Godolphin, and the queen ; x for to the lord treasurer and the general, the vigorous conduct of the war was the one important issue before parliament. Even the "Whigs were not as enthusiastically favorable to the war as they had been a few months before, owing partly to the heavy war taxes and partly to the fact that they had lost one of their great leaders, the second Earl of Sunderland, who had died at the conclusion of the elections. However, the Tories held a position, the weakness and inconsistency of which soon became visible. Unless Eng- land entered the conflict as a principal, Holland would not, and without English subsidies, Austria could not co-operate. No one knew this better than Louis XIV. Besides, England was now thoroughly embarked in the war, and considerable success had been achieved by Marl- borough and Rooke 2 before the end of the year. With each victory obtained by the allies, the Tory party lost popular support, and their moderate members drifted slowly toward the more patriotic Whigs, while the High Church zealots tended to form a group of irreconcilables. But this was not the only reason they gradually lost public favor. In the autumn of 1702, the Tories came into power, lEijks Archief, 26 A , L 'Hermitage to Heinsius, April 21; Eeid, p. 162. 2 For his achievements see his Journal; Evelyn, Diary, III. 397; Boyer, p. 32; Sismondi, Hist. Frangais, XXVI. 357-8. 86 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAKTIES filled with a determination to advance the cause of the church and improve the position of their own party. They saw an opportunity to accomplish both purposes at the same time. The Corporation and Test Acts provided that practically all officials, civil and military, before entering upon the performance of their duties, must con- form to the Anglican Church, and publicly partake of the sacrament according to its rites. The more conscientious and radical Dissenters could not do this, but those with more easy consciences had early circumvented the plain intent of the law by taking the sacrament once a year at an Anglican Church, and after that, attending such non- conformist services as met their approval. Such officials became known as "occasional conformers," and the practice, as "occasional conformity." 1 The ardent High Churchmen saw in this custom a travesty upon religion, 2 and were greatly angered because the vast majority of these men were Whigs. If they could be kept from office, there would be just so many more positions to distribute among the faithful Tories. Thus the latter would be able not only to build up their party through patronage, but at the same time to weaken both the Whigs and the Dissenters also, whom they cordially hated. All this they expected to accomplish by the Occasional Conformity Bill, which was introduced into the Commons early in the session and passed without difficulty. 3 The bill provided that not only the magistrates of cor- porations but also "all the inferior officers or freemen i Life of Calamy, I. 143. 2 The entire gamut of arguments may be found in such pamphlets as Moderation Still a Virtue, The Mask of Moderation Pulled Off the Foul Face of Occasional Conformity, Moderation Truly Stated, A View of the Present Controversy, and many other tracts of the years 1703-1705. a Burnet says it passed by a great majority. THE QUEEN AND PARLIAMENT 87 who were found to have any interest in elections, ' " must conform under severe penalties, and it was meant, on the face of it, to weaken the Whigs. Naturally, the House of Lords was greatly alarmed and one hundred and thirty members assembled, "the greatest number that had ever been together. ' ' The Whigs were much the stronger and they amended the bill by reducing the fines attached. To these alterations the Commons refused to assent, and after the popular interest had risen to fever heat, the bill went to a conference, for which both sides had marshaled their supporters, so that the Star Chamber, in which the Lords sat at this time, "was the most crowded . . . that had ever been known. ' ' 2 They failed to agree, and as the Lords voted after this meeting, the excitement was intense. It was not only a test of strength between Whigs and Tories, between High and Low Church, it was more; it was a struggle between the Commons and the Lords. The court exerted all its influence in favor of the measure. Prince George was an occasional conformer, who partook of the sacrament to qualify as lord high admiral, but continued his private Lutheran chapel. 3 Yet he attended the Lords at the behest of his wife and voted for the bill. Much to the surprise of the Highfliers, many spiritual lords opposed the measure, Burnet among the number. On three different portions of the bill, the majority against it was only one, but in each case a different man gave the deciding vote. 4 The Commons refused to yield i Py. Hist., VI. 63-4. 2 Burnet, V. 53, 108-9. s Hearne, I. 3 72. The prince was an alien and Godolphin was worried lest the bill might put him in an embarrassing position. So Granville waited on Anne to ascertain if she thought it advisable to include in the bill a clause exempting her consort from its provisions. Portl. MSS., IV. 51. *Parl. Debates (Turlock), III. 332; Evelyn, Diary, IV. 398. Several of the bishops had been appointed by William, who thought they should labor 88 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES and the measure was lost, leaving the Tories furious against Dissenters and bishops alike. However, the bill refused to remain dead, but came back later to haunt the Whigs. Indeed, in the next session, another was introduced in the Commons, as such men as Seymour, Bromley, and Rochester would never lose an opportunity to gain popu- larity by professing zeal for the church. 1 In the mean- time, the temper of the people had changed and Anne's zeal for the measure had cooled. 2 In concluding her ad- dress on opening the second session of her first parlia- ment, she said: "Let me therefore desire you all, that you carefully avoid any heats or divisions that may dis- appoint me of that satisfaction [harmony], and give encouragement to the common enemies of our church and state." 3 Nevertheless, the queen's ideas of the merits of the bill remained as before. "I shall not have the worse opinion of the lords that are for it; for though I should have been very glad, if it had not been brought into the Commons, because I would not have any pretense for quarrelling, I can't help thinking, now it is as good as past . . . the Lords too, ... I see nothing like persecu- tion in this bill." 4 Doubtless, she feared the consequence of strife between the houses, when England was at death- grips with France. Moreover, Anne had been made aware of the great opposition of the commercial classes to the bill; whereas the defection of the bishops and the for a reconciliation with the Dissenters. Burnet asserts that the five peers were created to carry this measure. Other Side, p. 194. See Defoe 's Review, II. No. 28. i Remusat, I. 148 ; Newcastle Papers, Add. MSS., 33084, f . 172. 2Epistol. Cor. of Dr. Atterbury, III. 132; Burnet, V. 109. s Pari. Hist., VI. 151, 155-8; House of Lords MSS. (n. s.), V. 157-9, 297-9. 4 Conduct, p. 154; Hatton-Finch Papers, Add. MSS., 29568, f. 151; Thomas, p. 132. THE QUEEN AND PARLIAMENT 89 curtain lectures of Burnet may have proved to the queen that her duty was to conciliate the non-conformists, 1 whose power was increasing. Despite Anne's plainly expressed desire that the strife over occasional conformity should cease, the Tory leaders persisted, although they softened down considerably the provisions of the second bill. On the previous attempt, it passed the Commons by a large majority, practically without discussion. This time it was fairly debated, but the vote was still strongly in its favor; it was sent up to the peers, and a tiresome debate ensued. Each side was reasonably confident, particularly the Highfliers. 2 The court was not so zealous as before in bringing up supporters; Prince George, with his wife's consent, not only failed to attend, but even neglected to send his proxy. 3 The motion for a second reading was lost 71 to 59, and 23 peers formally dissented, among them Marl- borough and Grodolphin. 4 The queen's attitude was so tactful that she lost neither Whig nor Tory support by her husband's action. Yet the extreme Highfliers were thoroughly enraged and more determined than ever. They took the bit firmly in their teeth and tried to run away with Anne and her moderate ministers. The queen was now thoroughly convinced of the inherent selfishness of the more ardent supporters of the bill, and later her influence was un- i Clarke and Foxcroft, Burnet, p. 401 ; Thomson, I. 408-11. 2 Add. MSS., 9712, f. 53; Newcastle Papers, Add. MSS., 33084, f. 172; Ellis Papers, Add. MSS., 28891, f. 263. s Luttrell, V. 369. Anne said : ' ' Mr. Bromley will be disappointed, for the Prince does not intend to go to the House, when the bill of occasional conformity is brought in; but at the same time I think him very much in the right not to vote in it. ' ' She was broad-minded enough to tolerate George's Low Church ideas. tParl. Hist., VI. 171; Hatton-Finch Papers, Add. MSS., 29568, f. 151. In the vote there were 29 proxies, 17 for, and 12 against, the bill. 90 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES equivocally thrown in the scales against them, largely on account of their ungenerous and tactless behavior. They refused to take their defeat philosophically, but immediately began crying that the church was in danger, an accusation which the queen considered a personal insult and a direct reflection upon her administration, especially since they further insisted that her ministry and the bishops were little better than fanatics. These peers were close to the truth when they charged Godolphin and Marlborough with double-dealing, inas- much as both secretly opposed the bill, while voting in its favor. 1 Anne, though unquestionably desiring legislation against Dissenters, was yet unwilling to countenance such disaffection from the Tories. Defoe's satirical pamphlet, The Shortest Way with the Dissenters, made these men angry when the hoax was made known, but Anne stood between them and their victim. 2 Her sympathy for Defoe marked the first step in her gradual drift toward the Whigs. Her feeling relative to the factiousness of Eochester, Nottingham, and others is well set forth in her speech closing the session. Sorrow is shown for the failure of the Tories to follow her advice, as well as a determination to insist upon her own views. "I am not discouraged," she said, "from persisting in the same earnest desire that you would go down into your several counties so disposed to moderation and unity, as becomes all those which are joined together in the same religion and interest." 3 The effect of this address upon the people was considerable, but upon the persistent High- i Consult the Parliamentary History (VI. 170) for the votes and the Portland MSS. (IV. 155) for Godolphin 's letter to Harley. See also Wharton's Memoirs, p. 40; J. Stoughton, Religion in England, p. 30. 2 Port. MSS., IV. 68. At first Anne was not in favor of releasing Defoe. Nottingham Papers, Add. MSS., 29589, f. 44. 3 Py. Hist., VI. 336. THE QUEEN AND PARLIAMENT 91 fliers and Jacobites it was entirely lost. They were still resolved upon extreme measures at the earliest oppor- tunity and rejoiced that ample time was given them between the sessions to prepare their plans. Anne's speech at the opening of the next session re- iterated her desire for concord between the warring factions, and she coupled with it an earnest appeal for the sympathetic co-operation of both houses. Even this failed to change in the slightest the determination of Jersey, Nottingham, and Buckingham, as they were reso- lute in their war against occasional conformists, who communicated with the Anglican Church in order to profit by holding public offices. Almost as soon as par- liament opened, therefore, leave was given to bring in another bill to prevent occasional conformity. 1 Its sup- porters knew that the Lords would never pass the measure on its own merits, so they decided to append it to some vital bill. Probably the most important act before parliament was the four-shilling land tax, which brought in the greatest revenue to the government of any tax levied, 2 and was necessary for the continuation of the war. Since its passage was of such moment, the Tories decided to "tack" their bill to it. Accordingly, William Bromley, after a lengthy speech in its favor, moved that it be tacked to the land tax bill. 3 The issue was now squarely drawn between the two houses; it not only raised the question of the power of the Lords over revenue measures, but was in direct oppo- sition to their resolution passed two years before at the recommendation of Halifax. He had foreseen the proba- i Hanover Papers, Stowe MSS. (B. M.), 222, f. 225; Franlcland-Eussell- Astley MSS. (H. M. C), p. 168; Luttrell, V. 486; Burton, T. 89. 2 It produced about £4,000,000. See Py. Hist., V. App. xix. 3Py. Hist., VI. 360; Chamberlen, p. 174; House of Lords MSS. (n. s.), VI. 229. 92 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES bility of a "tack" upon the first introduction of this bill, and moved "that the annexing any clause to a money bill was contrary to the constitution . . . and the usage of Parliament. ' n "Tacking" was not such an exceptional procedure, since in the reign of William alone at least three attempts were made to interfere with the financial powers of par- liament. With this experience fresh in mind, both parties awaited with the keenest interest the outcome of Brom- ley's motion, because a quarrel between the houses would have been fatal to administrative efficiency during the war. It was really a critical moment in English history, as both the friends and foes of the bill expected it to pass. The lower house realized the danger, however, and hesitated to assume responsibility for an open breach with the Lords, so after a long and spirited debate the Commons themselves defeated 2 the "tack" 251 to 134, and a disagreeable quarrel between the houses was averted. The result appears, on the face of it, as a splen- did illustration of the influence of the court and of the strength of such moderate Tories as Harley and St. John, whom the excessive aggressiveness of the extreme Tories had offended. 3 However, the Highfliers were not at the end of their resources ; they now passed the original bill through the Commons and sent it up to the Lords without the "tack." For the third time, the contest was close, but not so close as before, since a greater number realized the truth in Lord Mohun's statement that "if they passed the bill, they had as good tack the pretended Prince of Wales to i Life of Calamy, I. 465 ; Memoirs of Halifax, p. 89 ; Chamberlen, p. 67. 2 Py. Hist., VI. 362 ; Luttrell, V. 492 ; Colce MSS., III. 53. 3 Seventeen of the eighteen members from the Cinque Ports voted against it. See Oldmixon, IV. 346; Py. Hist., VI. 364; Somers' Tracts, XII. 469-76; Bath MSS., I. 64-5; Coxe, I. 249. THE QUEEN AND PAELIAMENT 93 it," 1 and the motion to read it a second time was lost 71 to 50, 2 although it came up again a few years later. The queen was piqued at the crude methods of the "tackers" and gave unmistakable expression to her dis- pleasure. A few moderate Tories feared an alliance between the Highfliers and the radical Whigs, which might drive the ministry from office. The equally adroit and mysterious Defoe assured Harley that such a "con- federacy" had been broached between the two factions. He even suggested that the ministry might use the im- moderate hatred of the High Church Tories for the Dis- senters to discredit the Highfliers, not only with the people but with Anne as well, and it is at least probable that the leading ministers did utilize the bill for their own purpose. 3 At any rate, the Tory zealots, expecting to show the queen their real strength through the ' ' tack, ' ' lost instead the support of able leaders in their own party, who became more closely allied with the junto as time went on. 4 In this struggle of the houses over reli- gion, the Whigs had won, and the Highfliers had lost the active assistance of their best friend, the queen, who was forced to turn to the moderate Tories and Whigs for support. There were two principles at stake in this contest over occasional conformity — that of religious toleration and i Life of Calamy, II. 27. Calamy thought that the measure would have been disastrous to England. Two short pamphlets, A Brief Account of the Tack (1705?) and The Character of a "Tacker" and " Anti-T acker" (1705), give a splendid conception of the feeling against the "tackers." The description of the "tacker" is almost humorous. See also Defoe's Review, May 12, 1705. 2 By. Hist., VI. 368. s Portl. MSS., IV. 148. See also on this point Bath MSS., I. 64; Defoe's Review, III. 177; Harrop, Bolingoroke, p. 29; Clarke and Foxcroft, Burnet, p. 413. * Faults on Both Sides, p. 27; James, III. 275. 94 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES that of the power of the Commons over taxation. Event- ually, the rights of Dissenters were left unchanged, and the right of the Commons to take the lead in matters of taxation was reaffirmed. In another sense, the failure of the High Church Tories lessened the influence of the church in politics and strengthened for the moment the queen's prerogative, although it eventually threw Anne more and more into the power of the Whigs, who grad- ually gained ground until by the summer of 1705 the ministry was Whig in fact, if not in name. The contest between the houses over religion was not the only one during this parliament, as they had clashed early over a question of jurisdiction, and this time the Commons were the aggressors throughout. In William's reign the latter had displayed an arrogance not fre- quently seen in a representative body, when they cast into jail certain Kentish petitioners, who had aroused their wrath by suggesting, with war so imminent, that the Commons should turn from loyal addresses to a consid- eration of bills of supply. Early in Anne's reign, the Commons displayed the same factious disposition in regard to Scottish affairs. Since the time of the Tudors, Scotland had been a fertile field for plots against Eng- land. Under the Stuart kings such plots were numerous enough, but they grew apace after 1688, as a large portion of the Scots were kindly disposed towards James II and his sons, and the foremost Scottish statesmen intrigued almost openly in favor of the Chevalier. The avarice of other time-serving Scots, and their willingness to serve any party or master who paid them well increased the number of plots, but numerous as they were in reality, the imagination of English officials multiplied them. Simon Fraser stands as one of the unprincipled rascals of history. Early in the reign he had come from France with a forged letter, purporting to be from St. Germain, THE QUEEN AND PARLIAMENT 95 and presumably addressed to Atkol, Scottish privy seal. 1 The Duke of Queensberry, the queen's commissioner in Scotland, in haste to take advantage of the suspicion thus cast on his dreaded rival, at once sent the queen word of the conspiracy. In the meantime, several supposed traitors were seized in England, the most important of whom was Sir John Maclean, equally famous as a High- land chieftain and Jacobite. The queen's fears were increased by Queensberry 's message, and in a speech before parliament, she promptly called attention to the danger, promising to lay the evidence before them as soon as possible. 2 The Whig peers rejoiced at this opportunity to dis- play their enthusiasm for the Protestant succession, and vie with the Tory commoners in securing the queen's good will. Immediately, a select committee was appointed to examine the prisoners. This plan, if pushed to its logical conclusion, would supersede the ordinary legal procedure, and the Commons strenuously objected, but before they could take action, Anne intimated that Maclean's examination was too technical a point for this committee to handle, and the peers agreed. Yet the lower house persisted and embodied their grievance in an ad- dress to the queen. The peers replied, only to be criti- cized, and the case dragged on and the recriminations might have taken even more the form of an endurance contest, had not the queen cooled their ardor by a tactful i Add. MSS., vols. 31249 to 31253, passim; Annals (1703), p. 189; Lock hart's Memoirs, pp. 76-87; Burnet, V. 96; Caveat against the Whigs, pp 46-62. 2 Py. Hist., VI. 172-4. The contemporary evidence of this plot is exten sive. Add. MSS., 20311; Hatton-Finch Papers, Add. MSS., 29587, ff 124-56; Mackintosh Papers, Add. MSS., 34526, f. 80B; Carte MSS. (Bodl.) CLXXX. 93-6, 407-47; S. P. Dom., Anne, I. 66, III. 104; S. P. Dom., Sec Letter Books, CIV. 385, sq.; Add. MSS., 9712, f. 55; Wharton MSS. (Bodl.), IV. 25. 96 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES address to the Lords. "I hope," she said, "none of my subjects have any desire to lessen my prerogative, since I have no thought of making use of it but for their pro- tection and advantage. I look upon it as a great mis- fortune, when any misunderstandings happen between the two houses." 1 This insinuation was not intended entirely for the upper house, and its meaning could not have been lost upon the Commons. The power of the crown would have suffered if this committee of the Lords had passed on the case. When the Commons urged Anne to take complete charge of the case, she replied through the lord steward "that the examination relating to Sir John Maclean is a matter of nicety and great importance, that it will be inconvenient to take it out of the method of examination it is now in, and she will, in a short time, communicate the same to this House." 2 The outcome of the struggle was indecisive, but the Lords are usually thought to have gained popularity by their publication of the precedents in the case. However, this struggle was neither so bitter, nor so important, nor its bearing on the powers and privileges of the house so direct as the celebrated Aylesbury case. December 26, 1700, William III issued writs for a par- liamentary election. At the poll in Aylesbury, Ashby presented himself to the constables as a duly qualified voter, 3 but they refused to allow him to vote, despite the fact that he had previously exercised the privilege un- i Py. Hist., VI. 224; Coke, III. 161, 170; Luttrell, V. 372. To one inter- ested in English constitutional history, the quarrel is important. Each house searched for precedents and the results are found in the Parliamentary History, VI. 172, 338. The Lords' report is particularly well written. 2 Add. MSS., 22263, f . 60. 3 Burnet suspected that a corrupt bargain had been made with the con- stables by one of the candidates. Cf. The Life and Reign of her late Excellent Majesty, Queen Anne, p. 230. Burnet, V. 114; Defoe, Legion's Humble Address. THE QUEEN AND PARLIAMENT 97 questioned. Thereupon, Ashby sued White, one of the constables, for damages, and was granted a verdict of £5 at the county assizes. Appeal was taken to the Queen's Bench, where the verdict was reversed by a divided court, Chief Justice Holt dissenting, on the ground that in cases involving the right of suffrage and elections, the Com- mons had exclusive jurisdiction. Forthwith the case was brought before the High Court of Parliament on a writ of error. This tribunal, the highest court of appeals in England — in reality nothing more than the peers sitting in their judicial capacity — reversed the decision of the Queen's Bench. 1 Once more the Commons were alarmed about so great an assumption of power by the peers, and again Anne had to act as peacemaker, as the lower house immediately made its feelings known. Little could then be accom- plished, as parliament was soon prorogued and both sides stopped for breath. In the interim, Ashby proceeded to execute judgment, and five other aggrieved voters brought suits against the constables. The Commons saw one of its historical privileges in danger of invasion — its most prized right of deciding all matters with reference to parliamentary elections and membership in the Com- mons — and in their wrath they committed Ashby and his associates to Newgate. The Lords could not long remain silent under such a challenge. At first all they could do was to encourage Ashby to ask the Court of Queen's Bench for a writ of habeas corpus. 2 In keeping with its former stand, this i Luttrell, V. 380; Hallam, Const. Hist. (1880 ed.), III. 264; State Trials, XIV. 695-888. The Lords also sent a copy of their decision to the sheriffs who should communicate them to their respective boroughs. Py. Hist., VI. 228. 2 Burnet, V. 188. Ashby seems to have been a hostler, and had a hard time keeping out of the rank of pauper during the trial. Wharton was supposed to be backing him. /&., V. 190; Wyon, I. 318. 98 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES tribunal refused to grant the writ against the commit- ment of the Commons, 1 Chief Justice Holt once more dis- senting. Angered by this decision, Ashby's supporters threatened to do the most obvious thing left them — carry the case before the Lords on a writ of error. The Com- mons at once became excited and petitioned the queen against the writ. Receiving little satisfaction, their fears got the better of their discretion, and they ordered that the "Aylesbury men might be discharged from their im- prisonment . . . and taken into custody of the sergeant- at-arms," of the Commons. The situation was a delicate one, particularly for Anne. On the one hand, the Lords were struggling to secure to the individual a property interest in his vote, on the other, the Commons were standing for their accustomed right of passing upon the qualifications of their own members. Despite the fact that the legality of the whole matter was in doubt, it was now laid before the queen for adjudi- cation. If she favored granting the writ, she openly alienated the men of the lower house, who presumably represented the popular mind; if she refused to consent to the writ, she would appear ungrateful to the house that was carrying out her wishes in legislative affairs. The arguments of the best legal minds may have con- vinced her that this writ of error was in reality a "writ of right" and could not be refused. 2 At any rate, she begged for a few days to consider the matter, and this element of time saved the whole situation, as she saw to i Howell, State Trials, XIV. 840; Hallam, Const. Hist., III. 265. 2 Coke, III. 194. Py. Hist., VI. 385; . . . Bepresentation and Address of the . . . Lords Spiritual and Temporal . . . , presented to Her Majesty (1704). The best brief account of the case is given by H. E. Shipman, The House of Commons and Disputed Elections, A. H. Assn. Reports (1914), I. 174-6. Contemporary statements of the case are found in Hatton-Finch Papers, Add. MSS., 29568, ff. 153-4; Sloane MSS. (B. M.), 3066; Py. Hist., VI. 431; House of Lords MSS. (n. s.), V. 259-62. THE QUEEN AND PAELIAMENT 99 it that parliament had practically finished, its work when she arrived at a decision. Anne's answers to the addresses showered npon her by both houses are proof of her tact in handling the diffi- cult situation. ' ' I should have granted the writs of error desired in this address," she finally replied to the Lords, ''but finding an absolute necessity of putting an imme- diate end to this session, I am sensible there could have been no further proceeding upon the matter. ' n With the prorogation the Aylesbury men under the charge of the sergeant-at-arms were released ; the peers had gained for their day a practical victory, though the legal question still remained undecided. The real advantage seems to rest with the Commons, as their control over all matters concerning elections has never since been successfully questioned. On account of the steadily growing power of the Commons the matter soon ceased to be of political importance. This celebrated case of Ashby vs. White was, however, more than a quarrel between the houses, it was really a test of the relative strength of Whig and Tory, and this fact partly accounts for Anne 's extremely judicious atti- tude. In the three contests between the two houses and the two parties as exemplified in their different positions on the questions of war — occasional conformity, the "tack," and the elections — party struggles stand out in bold relief, and indicate clearly the growing political self- consciousness of both Whig and Tory. On the other hand, these controversies display the serious attempts of the queen to stand above and between parties, a policy so difficult that it soon brought her into direct opposition to that faction, the religious inclinations of which re- sembled her own. Yet, despite her extreme piety, she could, and did forget her devotion to the church, the i Py. Hist., VT. 436. 100 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES moment she felt that her prerogative was attacked, or her individual rights assailed. Not only had the Highfliers dared to attack her pre- rogative and her affection for the church, but by their activity they stirred deeply her personal feelings. At her request, a bill was introduced into parliament by the impetuous, and grateful "Jack" Howe, granting a pen- sion of £100,000 to the prince in case he outlived the queen. 1 While this bill was passing through the Com- mons, an amendment was added which excepted the prince from the operation of a law prohibiting all foreigners, even though naturalized, from holding office under the crown. The ostensible reason for this amendment was the fear that future sovereigns might interpret the afore- said act to the detriment of the prince. The Lords, how- ever, looked upon it as a "tack" to a money bill and it was only after the most determined pressure on Anne's part, combined with dextrous management by the min- istry under the leadership of Godolphin and Harley, that the bill finally passed the Lords by a majority of four. 2 The queen was greatly displeased at the disrespect shown her husband and never forgave three 3 of the seven Lords who protested. Anne's resentment against the Whig lords could wait, however, as they were out of office; but not so with the Tories still in her councils. The first member of the ministry to feel the force of her wrath was her uncle, Rochester — the real leader of the Tories. Presuming i Boyer, p. 36. 2 L. J., Jan. 1, 1703; Rijks Arehief, 26^, Jan. 23, 1703; Luttrell, V. 259; Portl. MSS., IV. 57; Coxe, I. 104; Marlb. MSS., 53. In the committee of the whole in the Commons, a considerable number wished to reduce the allowance to £50,000. s Somers, Wharton, and Sunderland. Anne 's wrath was momentarily directed against Burnet, also, because he protested. Clarke and Foxcroft, Burnet, p. 400. Cf. Coxe Papers, XLI. 13. THE QUEEN AND PAELIAMENT 101 upon his kinship and the queen's approval of his High Church beliefs, he fully expected to be at her right hand in the government, and the astute Dutch representative at London feared lest he be appointed lord treasurer. 1 In truth, Rochester felt certain of being chosen as head of the ministry, and was greatly disappointed when Godolphin was selected instead. His pique was meas- urably increased when his favorite daughter, Lady Dalkeith, was passed over in favor of Marlborough's daughters in choosing ladies of the bedchamber, 2 and his temper once more gained the better of him. Yet Anne had been kind to him ; and for a time he was deep in her confidence. Not content with these marks of favor, he objected to her moderate policy in changing the ministry, in which attitude he was supported by the High Church adherents. Hypocritical as ever, he sought to ingratiate himself with his niece while absenting himself from his post of duty and intriguing against other members of the ministry. 3 Rochester's inclinations alarmed both Marlborough and Godolphin, who wished to work in harmony with him. After some difficulty, they prevailed upon the queen to order him to leave for Ireland, that they might get him out of the way. 4 When Anne's message reached Roch- ester, he hesitated for several days, then angrily waited upon her and asked to be excused from office. Greatly to his surprise, she calmly accepted his resignation, and, i Coxe, I. 235. 2 Conduct, pp. 131-5. Cf. Other Side, pp. 167-9. 3 L 'Hermitage to Heinsius, 21 April, 1702, Eijks Archief, 26A. Span- heim's dispatches to Berlin show the same thing. Von Noorden, I. 201. In October, 1703, Rochester presented Anne with a copy of his father's History of the Rebellion, which was dedicated to her as a granddaughter of the author. Luttrell, V. 351. *T. Salmon, Mod. Hist., I. 23; Cal. S. P. Bom. (1702-3), p. 251; Portl. MSB., IV. 39. 102 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES to his consternation, quietly made known her desire to see him no more at her cabinet council, saying that it was not reasonable he " should come to the council only when he pleased." 1 Her general demeanor made him furious, and henceforth he was to be found in the ranks of her Majesty's opposition. Anne had not only dis- missed, but disgraced him; partly because of the oppo- sition of Marlborough and Godolphin and partly on account of his stand relative to the pension she recom- mended for Marlborough; 2 but more particularly, it would seem, as a result of his presumptuous and insolent attitude towards herself, personally. Rochester's expulsion was only the beginning of the schism in the Tory party and the queen's first move against her high Tory ministers. Nottingham had been intimate in his relations with Rochester, and he, together with Seymour, Buckingham, Hedges, and Jersey, kept up their opposition to Marlborough and insisted upon displacing Whig officials by zealous Tories. In 1703, Nottingham opposed sending aid to the distressed Ceven- nois, who, on account of their heresy, were being so bitterly persecuted by Louis XIV. 3 Similarly, he gave trouble over negotiations with Portugal, maintaining that it was dishonorable for England to strike her enemies in another king's ports. He had also been one of the fore- most champions of the Occasional Conformity Bill, and an inveterate enemy of the Dissenters. In general, he was exceedingly annoying to the ministry on account of his obstructive tactics; 4 although, despite this factious opposition to court measures, Anne had been favorably i Conduct, p. 141; P. C. Reg., LXXIX. 304; Stepney Papers, Add. MSS., 7075, f. 13. 2 Parliament's refusal to reward Marlborough as she wished was a sensi- tive point with the Queen. See Other Side, pp. 205-6. a Wyon, I. 208 ; Lecky, I. 34 ; H. Belloc, Lingard 's Hist., XI. 82-3. * Timberland, II. 35-72, passim. THE QUEEN AND PARLIAMENT 103 disposed towards him. Before she had been queen two months, she appointed him secretary of state, in which position he was equally active and inefficient. 1 In Feb- ruary, 1703, he had the honor of bearing her message to the Lords, requesting them to dispatch their business speedily that she might end the session. A year later, at her command, he laid before the peers several depositions relating to the Scottish plot. In April, 1704, it was rumored that the dismal earl was to receive the Garter. 2 Like Rochester, however, Nottingham became too im- perious in his treatment of the queen, who was becoming alarmed lest the High Church Tories might carry things too far. He waited upon the lord treasurer and insisted upon the removal of the remaining Whigs from high offices. He received no satisfaction from Godolphin, so wisely waiting until Marlborough had sailed for Hol- land, he called upon Anne in person, and threatened to resign if she did not dismiss Somerset and Devonshire from the Privy Council, or at least neglect in the future to summon them. He probably had news of intended ministerial changes which would greatly weaken his posi- tion, else he would not have been so overbearing. Al- though Anne liked him personally, she never gave in to a threat, and she advised him to think the matter over. 3 This he agreed to do, but when he learned that his com- rades, Jersey and Seymour, were certain to be dismissed, he resigned. The appointment of his successor occa- sioned some difficulty, as a month elapsed before Harley was selected in his place. This promotion is one of the significant political events of the reign, as the introduc- i Like his successor, Nottingham was a politician rather than a diplomat. Nottingham Papers, Add. MSS., 29588-9, passim. See also Bath MSS., I. 63; Defoe, Conduct of Parties, p. 8; Mackintosh Papers, Add. MSS., 34513, f. 164. aLuttrell, V. 271, 371-2, 385, 410. 3 CoTce MSS., III. 35 ; Burnet, V. 139 ; Portl. MSS., IV. 86. 104 ENGLISH POLITICAL PABTIES tion of Harley and two of his colleagues, St. John and Mansell, into the ministry, meant the end for a while of all factious opposition to the queen in that body, which still remained moderately Tory. Anne's patience with the Highfliers was entirely ex- hausted. Their opposition to the Occasional Conformity Bill, the "tack," and the Aylesbury case made their presence in the ministry unbearable. For nearly three years she had struggled to carry on her government with the consent of the high Tories. Consistent with her own prerogative, she had done everything to conciliate them, but in vain. She had hoped to reign and govern by means of a composite ministry, made up mainly of Tories, but this was found impracticable, since the Highfliers refused to work in harmony with either Whigs or moderate Tories. When the usual arguments proved powerless to shake the queen's determination, they resorted to threats and intimidation. Thus challenged, iVnne had no choice but to pick up the gauntlet ; their leaders were dismissed one by one, and as soon as possible she caused writs to be issued for a new election. In these years Anne had faced a series of violent party struggles over war, religion, and jurisdiction between the two houses. In each contest, she had conducted affairs with moderation, tact, and political sagacity, constantly appealing to the public, whose sympathy she had gained early in the reign. Despite the immoderate rivalry between Lords and Commons, the intense bitterness between Whig and Tory, and the hatred between Dis- senter and Anglican, she contrived to prevent any open break, and ruled with the aid of the moderates of both factions. Supported by Marlborough as general, Godol- phin as first minister, and Harley as speaker, she suc- ceeded in gaining large grants of money for carrying on the war, which under the Duke of Marlborough's able THE QUEEN AND PAELIAMENT 105 leadership redounded greatly to the honor of the king- dom and increased her prestige abroad as well as at home. Dearer to the queen's heart than the war, was the union with Scotland, which had now reached a critical stage, but with all chances apparently in favor of its consummation. Thus, at the end of her first parliament, Anne had triumphed over the political factions which had threat- ened to deprive her of ministers who would do her bid- ding. The security of the Protestant succession seemed assured, while at the same time her general had won the glorious victory at Blenheim and Gibraltar had been captured, so that her kingdom once more ranked with the leading states of Europe. CHAPTER III THE ELECTION OF 1705 The queen had become weary of the jealousy between the two houses, and the rivalry of the Whigs and Tories. Thus in proroguing parliament in April, 1704, she begged in vain that they might forget their quarrels, "as the most effectual means imaginable to disappoint the ambi- tions of our enemies and reduce them to an honourable and lasting peace." 1 The factiousness of the Highfliers continued unabated and she was forced to dismiss some of them from the ministry to lessen the strife in the en- suing session of parliament. Of their gradual loss of public support the Tory zealots were as oblivious as of the increase in the queen 's popularity through the success of her armies and navy. Although she had been received with great acclaim at her accession, 2 Anne's popularity had slowly declined on account of the Jacobite intrigues and the heavy war taxes. In the autumn of 1704, the English were rejoicing at the victory of the great duke at Blenheim — the first decisive battle the English had won against their old hereditary enemy since Agincourt, as well as the first great military advantage over Louis XIV. English patriotism now burst forth anew, and many must have contrasted Anne's vigorous foreign policy with the sub- servience which her father and uncle had shown towards France. Aware of her growing power, she expressed her i Py. Hist, VI. 336. 2 S. P. Dom., Anne, II. 62-4; III. 34-5. THE ELECTION OP 1705 107 appreciation of the popular manifestations in her favor, by a speech opening parliament in October. Assuring her subjects that her greatest desire was to promote their welfare, she asked the houses to be even more liberal than before in voting military supplies, at the same time maintaining that she was willing to make personal sac- rifices "for the best advantage of the public service." She was still desirous of healing the wounds made by the disputes of the houses and the change of ministry, and appealed again to their patriotism, entreating them to stifle this last hope of Louis XIV. "My inclinations are to be kind and indulgent to you all," she said, "I hope . . . that there will be no contention but who shall most promote the public welfare. Such a temper cannot fail of securing your reputation both at home and abroad." 1 Such excellent advice was wasted; the Highfliers per- sisted in supporting the Occasional Conformity Bill, the defeat of which at the same time increased Anne's resent- ment and feeling of personal power. When Scottish affairs were under discussion, she attended the debates in the Lords in the hope that her presence might strengthen the ministerial policy concerning Scotland. We have seen that when the Aylesbury case threatened to disrupt parliament, she had quietly prorogued it, but not without thanks for its liberal war grants, which she hoped might soon bring a peace both favorable and lasting. "I con- clude, therefore, with exhorting you all to peace and union," she repeated, "which are always commendable, but more particularly necessary at this time, when, the whole kingdom being shortly to proceed to new elections, it ought to be the chief care of everybody, especially of such as are in public stations, to carry themselves with the greatest prudence and moderation." 2 i Py. Hist., VI. 355-6. 2 lb., 437. 108 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES During the summer of 1705, the queen found it neces- sary to fill some vacant dioceses, to which she appointed moderate men, hoping that these bishops might help check the zeal of the Highfliers both in parliament and in the ensuing elections. For similar reasons, she deemed it advisable to remove Buckingham and appoint the Duke of Newcastle in his stead. She further gave places to the moderates by admitting the Earl of Peterborough, the Earl of Kent, the new lord chamberlain, and the Earl of Cholmondeley to the Privy Council. Others of her sup- porters were also rewarded by appointments in the military service or promotions to the peerage. 1 As a result, she had secured, by the close of March, 1705, a ministry personally acceptable to her. Godolphin rested secure in her confidence, and, aided by the new ministers, attempted to administer the government in accordance with her wishes. This he could not hope to do with the Tories controlling the Commons. According to law, the next election must occur before the close of the year, so the ministry now sought to choose a new House of Commons which would favor the vigorous prosecution of the war. The Tory strength in parliament had been shown in the contests between the two houses, in which they lost something of public favor, but the "tack" was a fatal Tory blunder. 2 However, even with the growing Tory unpopularity, the power and influence of church was so great that the Whigs could not expect to defeat their opponents, except by skilful management. Naturally, the Tories could count on the clergy for some effective work, and the Whigs could balance their ascendancy and their harangues only by an active canvass, supplemented by a liberal use of money. Of the necessity of such large i Annals (3705), p. 7; Py. Hist., VI. 439; Cokayne, Peerage, IV. 357. 2 Life of Calamy, II. 34. THE ELECTION OF 1705 109 expenditures, the Whig leaders were well aware, as they found their rivals already active. Consequently, they made early preparations for the contest. 1 Few elections in the early eighteenth century were so bitterly contested as was this. 2 The Tories felt them- selves slipping, through the loss of the queen's favor, and went to their pollings determined to retrieve what they had lost through her hostility, by gaining a still larger majority in the Commons. On the other hand, the Whigs had tasted the sweets of political power and were deter- mined to increase their influence. "Feuds were scarce ever higher, nor greater interest made," wrote Roger Coke, "all the distinctions of parties were not confined to High and Low Church only, but tackers, sneekers and what not were continually trumped up. ' ' 3 " The elections were disputed with equal industry, and more than ordi- nary heat and animosity by the High and Loiv Church Party."* To regain their influence, the Tories depended as formerly upon family influence, active electioneering, and the support of the lesser clergy. Even their opponents, apparently, do not accuse them of bribery or corruption. However, they did make the most of family ties and i Godolphin-Osborne Papers, Add. MSS., 28041, f. 5; Ellis Papers, Add. MSS., 28892, f. 411. In September, 1703, Bromley began preparations for this election. Portl. MSS., IV. 67. Early in 1705, Sir Thomas Coke wrote a campaign letter in behalf of two candidates for the borough of Derby. A month later, he learned that the Whig candidate had the advantage of being already on the ground. Coke MSS., III. 54-5. Another of Harley's friends was laying his plans a year before the dissolution. Portl. MSS., IV. 84, 125. See also Fortescue MSS. (H. M. C), II. 8-13; Kenyon MSS. (H. M. C), 434; Preface to Defoe's Review, II. 2S. P. For., German States, CLXI. 539; Carte MSS. (Bodl.), CXXV. 94, CCXLIV. 59; Portl. MSS., IV. 179-86; Boyer, 178; CoJce MSS., III. 58- 61; House of Lords MSS. (n. s.), VI. xxii; Defoe, Review, II, preface. Cf. Portl. MSS., IV. 177. s Coke, III. 208 ; Portl. MSS., IV. 200. * Chamberlen, p. 188; Carte MSS. (Bodl.), CCXLIV. 58-9; Boyer, p. 178. 110 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES raised an incessant cry that the church was in danger 1 from the non-conformists, whose strength had been shown in the defeat of the Occasional Conformity Bill. In this fight against the Dissenters, they enlisted the support not only of the zealous vicars and curates, but likewise of the Jacobites, and even of the papists. From one end of England to the other, went forth the appeal to stand by the church against the forces of atheism and republicanism; to save the queen from the hands of the ungodly Whigs, who were drawing closer and closer to her and would soon enslave her. 2 These arguments were not without effect, although they failed entirely in the larger towns, where devotion to the church did not run so high. 3 The most efficient Tory canvassers were the country clergy, whose influence over their poorer parish- ioners still remained greater than that of the Whig poli- ticians, although their methods were not always above reproach. 4 The dispute over religious matters gave the Tories and Whigs alike an added opportunity to make use of the press in this election. Pamphlets of all kinds were turned out at a rapid rate, and ' ' the lampoons fly as thick as hail in order to influence the approaching elections." 5 The topic most favored by each party was the Occasional Con- formity Bill and the ' ' tack, ' ' and some of the tracts are not only ingenuous but entertaining. Among these the i Kenyon MSS. (H. M. C), P- 434; Ailesoury MSS. (H. M. C), pp. 188- 9; Fortescue MSS. (H. M. C), I. 16-7; Portl. MSS., IV. 125; Coke MSS., III. 54-70; Ellis Papers, Add. MSS., 28893, f. 137; Add. MSS., 28892, f. 411; Py. Hist., VI. 440; Eemusat, I. 159; Oldmixon, IV. 356. 2 Chamberlen, p. 188; Sharp, I. 133. 3 Papists, non-jurors, and Jacobites were the main support of the "tackers." Defoe's Beview, II. No. 33. See also Oldfield, Pari. Hist., I. 377. 4 Hearne, I. 22-3; Portl. MSS., IV. 214; Defoe, Beview, II. Nos. 36-7. 5 Add. MSS., 4743, f. 31. One of the most noted tracts was A Memorial of the Church of England, by James Drake. See Lecky, I. 61. THE ELECTION OF 1705 111 best were the work of Hoadly, Defoe, Leslie, Tutcliin, and Toland. Defoe, however, was more than a pam- phleteer; already he had begun his Review, which was extensively read, and exerted a great influence on the elections in favor of the ministry, with which Defoe had become in secret actively allied. 1 John Dyer's News Letter was also widely circulated at the time. The Tories made some use of the Paris Gazette, 2 but the advantage lay clearly with the ministry in its use of the London Gazette, The Postman, and Defoe's Review. The great weapon in the Whig arsenal was the un- friendly attitude of the Tories towards the queen, as shown in the "tack" and the bill on occasional con- formity, thus making capital of the well-known loyalty of the people for their sovereign, while at the same time insisting upon the rights of the Commons over taxation. Despite some Tory pamphlets, their arguments were favorably received by the voters. 3 The Whig nobles were also exceptionally active throughout the canvass. Somer- set and Wharton interested themselves especially in the pollings, and the peers in general did "more in electing this Parliament than ever," 4 a resolution of the House of Commons to the contrary notwithstanding. i See the account of his 1100-mile electioneering tour in Portl. MSS., IV. 269-72. Strangely enough, Defoe was offended at the practice of print- ing the names of parliamentary candidates on small sheets and handing them about. Review, II. No. 32. 2 Ellis Papers, Add. MSS., 28893, f. 137; Burnet, V. 218; Py. Hist., VI. 440. 3 Chamberlen, p. 188; A Memorial of the Church of England acted as a boomerang to the Tories, for it proved that in their exasperation, they did not spare even the queen, much less her favorite ministers. See Tindal, IV. 184, and Life of Calamy, II. 35. Toland answered it in a Memorial of the State of England. 4 From Dyer's News Letter in Portl. MSS., IV. 190. At Lewes the sheriff threatened to "adjourn the Court," if Somerset and his companions did not leave. They left and the poll continued. lb., 185; Egerton MSS. 112 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAKTIES Many noblemen chose to interfere by less direct meth- ods, and placed their money where it would do the great- est good, thus causing the Tories to complain of the large sums used by the Whigs to corrupt voters. That revered old Tory, John Evelyn, in one of the last entries in his diary, wrote of the "most extravagant expense to de- bauch and corrupt votes for Parliamentary members," adding significantly: "I sent my grandson with his party to my freeholders to vote for Mr. Harvey," 1 showing that he still retained a hearty interest in elections. Elec- tion petitions explicitly charge bribery in at least fifteen constituencies, involving more than a score of seats. 2 Some excellent examples of petty bribery are found in the Bedwin election. At first the electorate demanded £6 apiece for their votes, but eventually compromised on £5, if certain that their debts, varying from Is. 4d. to £3 lis., were paid for them. Some received the £5 di- rectly, but in several cases the same sum was given to their wives ostensibly for spinning wool at 20s. per pound. 3 Petty bribery at the pollings at Huntington was (B. M.), 929, f. 72; Clarke and Foxcroft, Burnet, p. 417; Hearne, I. 117; C. J., XV. 15. i Diary, III. 407. Harvey was a stanch Tory and Evelyn was very angry because of his defeat. See also Portl. MSS., IV. 199. 2 C. J., XV. 8-18, passim. s Ailesbury MSS. (H. M. C), p. 191. Each man on the receipt of the £5 gave his bond, which was to be returned to him a fortnight after the elec- tion if he had voted as he promised. After the Whig candidates had bribed the electorate, sixteen of them decided to desert to the Tories, but they were kept prisoners, plied with wine, and taken to the polls before their guards were removed. Pollexfen, a London merchant, seems to have been the leading Whig candidate, and had the voters well in hand. He secured Charles Withers, later returned for Whitchurch, to stand for the borough along with himself, but when he would not pay more than £4 as a bribe to each of the voters, Pollexfen gave him up as hopeless, and got Admiral Sir George Byng to stand. Sir George was more liberal and willingly con- tributed £5 to £10 to each voter. Apparently, the voters invited rich mer- chants to stand for the borough. lb., pp. 193-4. THE ELECTION OF 1705 113 so extensive that one of the election managers was taken in custody by the House of Commons. 1 At Lestwithiel, the bailiff, a publican, was offered "50 Guineas and a Bell," while £5 was the usual price for the doubtful members of the electorate of twenty-four. At Oak- hampton, the petitioner boasted that he would spend £2,000 to win the poll. 2 At Marlborough, bribery was in the main less direct, although Somerset's agent was "about paying 3011. debts for Solomon Clarke, and offers as much to Flurry Bowshire." The Mayor of the town not only demanded an enormous amount of food and drink for his annual feast, but together with one "Tom Smith" forced the candidates to buy his products at extortionate prices. 3 Wharton, the Whig leader, is said to have spent £12,000 upon his elections. 4 "Mr. Diston spares no pains or costs," wrote one man, "I am sure if you give £500 for a common councilman Diston will out- bribe you on all occasions." 5 Robert Pitt paid £100 to secure one vote of the ten at notorious Old Sarum for his candidate, who even then nearly lost his seat through a double return. 6 Defoe complained that in spite of the acts recently passed to prevent bribery and corruption at elections, "never was treating, bribing, buying of voices, freedoms and freeholds, and all the corrupt prac- tices in the world, so open and barefaced. ' ' 7 The making of "faggot voters" was another efficient 1 The bribes varied from a guinea to £15. C. J., XV. 104. 2 C. J., XV. 92-4, 72-3. 3 Ailesbury MSS. (H. M. C), pp. 195-6. Bribery was almost open in the election at Newcastle-under-Lyme. C. J., XV. 178. *D. N. B., art. on "Wharton." See also Hearne, I. 117; C. J., XV. 15. s Portl. MSS., IV. 1 76. Diston had probably spent £300 in lawsuits and bribes since the last election. zFortescue MSS. (H. M. C), I. 17; see also C. J., XV. 60-1. 7 Defoe's Review, II. No. 32. The law in question was 2 & 3 Anne, c. 13. Many of the petitions in controverted elections complain of "threats, promises, bribes, treats," or "treating, bribery, menaces." C. J., XV. 10. 114 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES method of gaining elections, as large landholders might by splitting freeholds control a considerable number of votes. Complaints from the Tories against this way of winning elections are frequent, and Tory defeats in Hert- fordshire, Cheshire, Essex, and Colchester were laid to this trick. In the first two pollings, all four unsuccessful Tory candidates polled a larger number of votes than the victorious ones in 1702. 1 The Whig victory at Rich- mond was gained, according to the petitioner, partly "by splitting of votes, and houses, and lands, to multiply votes," and at Lestwithiel "deeds passed a freehold to 26 persons." 2 Other sources also afford us instances of this practice, which seems to grow more prevalent in early eighteenth-century elections. So extensive an employment of money in this election reminds one somewhat of the election of 1698, when the two East India companies competed against each other for the favor of the electorate. As in that canvass, so in this, the commercial element put forth a great deal of effort. Many wealthy merchants were themselves candi- dates for seats, and in Wiltshire "17 strangers are like to be chosen, not one of them having a foot of ground in that county," 3 while the same complaints were made about the pollings at Norwich, Bedwin, Marlborough, and other places. 4 Whatever the influence of religion; however effective the money of the Whigs and the violence of the rabble, the most frequent complaint was against the chicanery of iPortl. MSS., IV. 188; The Bepullican Bullies, p. 5; C. J., XV. 135. In Essex, 405 freeholders were made. Coke HISS., III. 61. Robert Pitt made one faggot voter at Old Sarum. Fortescue MSS., I. 16. 2 C. J., XV. 15, 92. 3 Portl. MSS., IV. 188. * C. J., XV. 56; Atterbury, Advice to the Freeholders of England; C. Davenant, Balance of Power; Bolingbroke, Letter to Windliam; Oldfield, Pari. Hist., I. 377. THE ELECTION OF 1705 115 the returning officer, as more than a score of the petitions claimed unfair returns or the polling of illegal votes. These complaints bring to light the manifold qualifica- tions among the borough electorates, which were only slightly removed from immemorial custom by the Last Determinations Act of 1696. The situation at Leicester was exceedingly sordid: six men seem to have voted twice ; twenty-eight were either not on the poll books or their landlord paid their parish dues ; twenty either lived in hospitals, or had their rent paid or received weekly col- lections ; eleven were not found in the books, and no one in the borough knew of them ; sixty-four were eventually disqualified by the committee on' elections because they had been made free at the expense of the candidates ; and fifty-four " faggot" voters were made freemen at the expense of the sitting members. 1 The question of who should be permitted to vote was also raised with some justice at St. Albans, Norwich, Agmondisham, and Hertford. 2 Despite the part played by religious animosity, bribery, and election tricks, the Dissenters were without doubt the most important single factor in the election, as they had become alarmed at the progress of the Occasional Conformity Bill, and its narrow escape from passage. With them were joined the Low Churchmen who favored a liberal ecclesiastical policy. Evelyn realized that this combination was invincible, and such bribery as the Tories might have attempted would have borne little fruit with this group. 3 i C. J., XV. 135. The Carte MSS. (CXXV. 94) contain additional in- formation about the wholesale treating of the electors in this election. 2 C. J., XV. 37-56, passim. s Evelyn, Diary, III. 408 ; Ellis Papers, Add. MSS., 28892, f . 276. See also Defoe's reports in Portl. MSS., IV. 153, 175; Hearne, I. 49. In his Review, Defoe never lost an opportunity to attack the "tackers" as un- patriotic, and urged the voters to defeat them. See volume II. Nos. 25-33. 116 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES The Quakers, too, played a more important part in this election than in any since 1701, when Spencer Cowper's trial aroused such great interest. Their great leader, William Penn, had gained very considerable influence in political affairs, after convincing the ministry that there were " 40,000 Quaking Freeholders in England." 1 Har- ley was Penn's close friend, and, by their united efforts, the Quakers joined the rest of the non-conformists, and their close co-operation brought victory to the Whigs in several places. Dyer's News Letter recounts that at 11 Brentford several hundred of them polled against Smithson and Lake as they have done against the Church's interest all England over." 2 In spite of frequent gains by Dissenters and Low Churchmen, the Highfliers labored valiantly and suc- ceeded in many places, such as Oxford and Cambridge Universities, in returning "tackers," while one member for Warwickshire was a "tacker"; 3 but this was so in- frequent as to be the cause of considerable comment by those who kept track of election results. A difficult point to determine with regard to the elec- tions of this reign is the part played by the court, and yet it is extremely important to know to what extent parlia- Lady Marlborough also made war on the Highfliers in her electioneering. C. J., XV. 38. See also Ailesbury MSS. (H. M. C), p. 190. i Hearne, I. 68. The importance of Penn and the Quakers is to some extent indicated by the fact that some weeks after the election, Penn mar- ried a Quaker "heiress of £30,000 fortune" to a watchmaker's son in the presence of "three Dukes, among them the Duke of Ormond, eight Lords, seven foreign envoys, and abundance of other gentry." lb., I. 212. An- other William Penn was a candidate at Bramber, but after petitioning against "bribery, treating," etc., withdrew his petition. C. J., XV. 13, 56. 2 Portl. MSS., IV. 188, 190. They were particularly active in Bucking- hamshire and Essex. s Ellis Papers, Add. MSS., 28893, f. 114; Carte MSS. (Bodl.), CCXLIV, 58; Burnet, V. 223; Portl. MSS., IV. 188-90. In all at least 70 "tackers" were chosen. Cf. Defoe's Review, II. No. 31. THE ELECTION OF 1705 117 ment was packed. Cooke believed that the court re- mained neutral in 1705, but exactly what he meant is not clear from the context. If he referred to Anne 's personal activity, he was probably correct in his surmise, although he failed to notice that she had made known her feelings against the "tackers" and her agents were at no loss how to proceed. He probably relied upon Burnet, who wrongly stated that "the Court acted with such caution and coldness that the Whigs had very little strength given them by the ministers in managing elections ; they seemed rather to look on indifferent spectators." 1 The bishop flatly contradicts himself, because he also noted that the queen "spoke to me with relation to the elections. She said we saw she trusted to us ; and in particular she spoke severely of Mr. Fox," 2 candidate for Salisbury. This hint set Burnet energetically to work against Fox, but without success. Similar suggestions also impelled the Duchess of Marlborough to oppose the "tackers" at St. Albans. 3 In some instances the part played by the court was more direct. At Oxford the ministry had the poll put off a week, "in which time Godolphin got twenty votes," wrote Thomas Carte. "He sent on purpose to the Isle of Wight for one vote, and as far as Wales and Cumber- land for others. Windsor went to Lincoln for one vote and I rode one hundred miles in two days. The Queen sent her O/Wn, and my Lord Keeper his chaplain to vote against him [Windsor] as did all the London clergy also," 4 but in vain. Since the queen took an active in- i Burnet, V. 223; Tindal, IV. 183. 2 Clarke and Foxcroft, Burnet, p. 417. Fox was Paymaster of the Forces in Ireland, and was said to be the fiance of Rochester's daughter. 3 C. J., XV. 38. See House of Lords MSS. (n. s.), VI. xxii; Priv. Cor., I. 35. * Carte MSS. (Bodl.), CCXLIV. 58; Ellis Papers, Add. MSS., 28893, f. 114. 118 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES terest in the canvass, the rest of the court might be expected to follow her example. "It is well known which side the court took," wrote Roger Coke, "which he may be morally sure will never encourage tacking of bills nor those who adhere to such designs." 1 Besides, Bishop Trelawny practically acknowledged that Godolphin and he were "to model the elections in our county for the next (to make it a court) Parliament." 2 Other important political leaders had no doubt of the activity of the minis- ters. Before the elections began, Somers accurately fore- told the action of the court. 3 Godolphin took a great inter- est in the election of his son, Francis, and Harley wrote to Sir Humphrey Gower, asking him to use his influence in favor of young Godolphin. 4 The lord treasurer was also much concerned about the Woodstock election. "This battle," he wrote to Harley, "vexed me very much. What good will it do to have Lord Marlborough beat the French abroad if the French at home must beat him. ' ' 5 Not only Godolphin then, but Harley, as well, at- tempted to influence the elections. One candidate wrote to the speaker of his invitation to stand for Hereford "and doubted not to carry it if honored with Harley 's support"; another courtier promised the speaker to sup- port the ministerial candidates at Cheshire, with the implied understanding that he was to be rewarded by Godolphin. 6 All three candidates were successful. Prob- i Coke, III. 208. For other evidence of Anne 's activity, see Clarke and Foxcroft, Burnet, p. 419; C. J., XV. 38. 2 Forth MSS., IV. 102. See also Oldfield, Pari. Hist., I. 376; Coxe, I. 346. s Shrewsb. Cor., p. 647. He believed Anne would throw her influence against the Tories. See also Eemusat, I. 159. 4 Portl. MSS., IV. 179. Defoe complained because Godolphin would not urge the bishop to set up his son, who could have beaten Seymour at Exeter. II., IV. 214. 5 lb., IV. 180. « Portl. MSS., IV. 170, 173; CoTce MSS., III. 61-2. THE ELECTION OP 1705 119 ably the most typical letter to Harley at this time is that of Sir Rowland Gwynne, the perennial office seeker, who promised everything and accepted anything rather than be out of office. 1 It does not appear that Harley took up Gwynne 's candidacy, as the latter was not elected for Brecon, for which he stood, where Harley 's recommen- dation would have been equivalent to an election. The fact that Gwynne applied to the ministry at all, would show that he thought that the court was interfering in elec- tions. 2 Harley 's firmest friend, St. John, was also active. Harley had assumed that he was busy with his own elections. "I did all I was able to serve the Lord Duke in that of Woodstock; my own gave me no trouble," St. John reported. "Harcourt's election I could not in- fluence, and there is so much merit in being against the 'tack,' whatever some wise men may think, that Nevil was not to be opposed." 3 The ministry thus appears to have been very active in the election, and Harley seems to have been particularly energetic. Some Tories bitterly denounced this court influence. "We have here, the most alarming proof imaginable of the influence of ministers over elections," said one Tory writer. "When they would have Tories re- turned, we returned Tories ; when they would have Whigs returned, we returned Whigs ; so that in fact, the court is rather represented than the people. What wonder then, i ' ' I have offered my services to the county of Brecon. If I am not chosen there perhaps I may be elsewhere, and if I am I will heartily join with my Lord Duke, my Lord Treasurer, and you, in whatever measures you take to serve her Majesty to the utmost of my power. But if I am not chosen, I should be much obliged to you and them, if you will obtain for me some employment abroad wherein I may serve her Majesty and live with reputation." Portl. MSS., IV. 181. See also it., IV. 175-273, passim. 2 It is highly improbable that Harley helped Gwynne, as he was looked upon as Koehester's representative and Seymour's successor in his "West- ern Empire." Portl. MSS., IV. 175. 3 lb., 180, 269. 120 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES that supplies are always granted, and that grievances are never redressed." 1 The court, indeed, had all the ad- vantage in carrying on the elections, as they had in their gift the patronage of the crown, as well as a more plenti- ful supply of ready money than the Tories. More visible influences were at work in the form of rioting. The violence employed on both sides seemed i 'scandalous," even to the sophisticated Defoe, who was horrified at the "infinite briberies, forgeries, perjuries, and all manner of debaucheries" of the principles of elections, while he stood aghast at "all sorts of violences, tumults, riots, and breaches of the peace" and threat- ened to publish the "black history of the election to C [oven] try," 2 which was probably the most violent in 1705. A state of civil war existed and civil authority was temporarily in abeyance. At times parties of several hundred fought furiously in the streets; many were "horsed," and when any wished to poll for Bridgman or Hopkins their opponents "were ready to eat them." All freemen had the right to vote, but this reign of terror kept the timid from the polls. Besides, there was no list of freemen, no one was sworn at the polls, no books were kept, and a scrutiny was impossible. After the election, about one hundred and fifty "persons of the Whig party were indicted and tried . . . for a riot ... at the elec- tions." 3 The case had been brought before the bar of the Commons, which declared that there had been a "notorious riot and tumult . . . and other illegal prac- tices in contempt of the civil authority, and in violation of the freedom of elections." 4 i Other Side, p. 246. 2 Review, II, preface. See also Minto, Life of Defoe, pp. 63-4. 3Hearne, I. 28; Portl. MSS., IV. 188, 320; Defoe, Review, II. Nos. 29, 34, 40; C. J., XV. 22, 276-8. * Luttrell, VI. 135. It is interesting to compare Professor Silliman ? s THE ELECTION OF 1705 121 The Chester riots show that conditions at Coventry were not so exceptional. "The cry of the whiggish rabble at the election for the county of Chester . . . was ' clown with the Church and the Bishops ' ; and when sixty of the clergy headed by the Dean came to poll they said Hell was broke loose, and they were the Devil's black- guard ; they abused the Bishop, though on account of his peaceful temper he did not intermeddle in the election and to complete their outrage broke the windows of the cathedral and another church. ' n To gain time, the Whigs compelled the clergy to take the oaths of allegiance and supremacy separately and many of them went away without voting. Freemen were created especially for this election, as all the candidates received votes far in excess of those in 1702. 2 The Leicester polling was a strenuous affair if we are to believe one complainant. "The petitioner brought several people in a tumultuous manner with sledge- hammers, bars of iron and other instruments, and broke down the partition built in court to keep the rabble from annoying the magistrates and officers that took the poll and when the justices then met commanded them in the Queen's name to keep the peace, he ordered them never- theless to go on ; which obstructed the poll and occasioned great disorders and delays, and brought on the poll to nights when by the constable and others, . . . the great- est violence imaginable were committed against Mr. Winstanley's voters." 3 On polling day Salisbury was a pandemonium. "The Bishop [Burnet] and his steward were hustled by the clergy and the mob ; his friends were account of an election in Coventry just a century later, 1805, when similar rioting took place. Silliman 's Journal, I. 114-8. i Dyer's News Letter, 29 May, 1705, printed in Portl. MSS., IV. 189. 2 The Republican Bullies, p. 5. 3 Carte MSS. (Bodl.), CXXV. 94. 122 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES maltreated; the Dukes of Bolton and Somerset received 'strange insults.' ' n At Calne, "a great tumult" oc- curred, "to the hindrance of such as would have voted for the petitioners." 2 What with violence, bribery, treating, or appealing to the voters to stand against the "tackers," the court was able to bring about a working majority in the Commons. 3 To some extent this was due to the real success of Marl- borough, and the doubtful victory of Rooke, because it proved that the masses would not refuse to support a war which brought victory over Louis XIV. They could not forget the glories of Blenheim if they would, and could scarcely refrain from attributing disloyalty to those Tories who did not openly favor the continuation of a war to humble France. On the other hand, the Whigs were supported by the financial and commercial interests, not alone because of their religious toleration, but because they championed the war. The significance of this election lies in the great activity of Anne and the ministry, the increased employ- ment of open corruption and violence, and the influence of religious and economic as well as political questions in bringing about an overturn of the presumptuous High- fliers, who had dared to reflect even upon the queen her- self. In one sense, it was a victory for the war party ; in another, it was for Anne a personal triumph, although the increasing strength of the Whigs in Parliament augured ill for her peace of mind in the future. The first duty of a newly elected house is to choose a speaker. Though usually an easy task, on this occasion i Clarke and Foxcroft, Burnet, p. 417. See also A. A. Locke, Seymour Family, p. 159. 2 C. J., XV. 9. a See Chamberlen, p. 188; Life of Calamy, II. 34; Annals (1705), pp. 14-18. THE ELECTION OF 1705 123 it involved one of the bitterest contests for the speaker- ship of which we have any account. Harley had served three parliaments in that capacity and had made an en- viable record. Even after his appointment as secretary of state, some thought it perfectly good form for him to hold both offices, so he might have secured a re-election if he had chosen. With his usual good judgment, how- ever, he thought it advisable to decline the office, inasmuch as his new duties were heavy and somewhat strange to him. 1 Extraordinary efforts were made at once to get out as many men as possible at the opening of the session, for the speakership had not yet become non-partisan and the selection of speaker gave the successful party a decided advantage. The high efficiency of party organization, before party " whips" were developed, 2 is shown by the attendance of more than 450 of the 513 members who had been elected. 3 Such an attendance is perhaps the record before the union, as many men elected to parliament never attended, a considerable number had died since the end of the pollings, and others were prevented from at- tending by indisposition or business. An attendance of 400 was rare indeed, while 450 was very exceptional, and faintly indicates how much the choice of speaker aroused public interest. As soon as it was ascertained that Harley would not iPortl. MSS., IV. 215, 248. Holding the speakership and a portfolio was not exceptional. Strangely enough, Smith held the chancellorship of the exchequer and the speakership for several months in 1708. lb., IT. 193. Cf. James, III. 270. 2Godolphin Papers, Add. MSS., 28052, f. 110; Mackintosh Papers, Add. MSS., 34521, ff. 63-4; Bath MSS., I. 78. There was a "meeting of a great number of loyal Church Parliament men at the Fountain Tavern ... to consider their strength for the choice of Mr. Bromley to be Speaker." Hearne, I. 58. See Kent, pp. 93-7. 3 Evelyn, Diary, III. 408; Tindal, IV. 183; C. J., XV. 5. Cf. Ranke, V. 290. 124 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES be a candidate for the presiding office of the "bear garden" (to use his own expression), the court suggested Solicitor-General Harcourt as a man who would be satis- factory to both the violent and moderate Tories, but the Highfliers would not support him. 1 Profiting by their non-conciliatory attitude, the ministry made a bid for Whig support by nominating John Smith, a moderate Whig, as their choice for speaker. The Tories planned to support William Bromley, a vehement Highflier and the father of the Occasional Conformity Bill. The issue was now clearly drawn, as such a choice ended all hopes of accommodation between the ministry and the Tories, for the ensuing contest was a decisive test of strength between the court and Whigs on one side and the High Church Tories on the other. 2 Both jockeyed for position ; both anxiously awaited the first meeting of parliament. No one on either side was more active or effective in this fight than Harley, who was able to conciliate a consider- able number of moderate Tories and win their votes for Smith. Moreover, the queen in person interfered by writing to Lady Bathurst to persuade her son to vote for Mr. Smith. 3 Each side seemed supremely confident 4 and talked with equal virulence, if not with equal eloquence. For an hour and a half they wrangled, their arguments i W. Coxe, Memoirs of Robert Walpole, II. 6; Hearne, I. 51. zPortl. MSS., IV. 215; Burnet, V. 228; A. I. Dasent, Speakers of House, p. 240. At first the Whigs laughed at Bromley's nomination. Hearne, I. 58. Cf. Annals (1705), p. 180. Vernon considered it a crisis in state affairs. James, III. 270. 3 Strickland, XII. 122; Coke, III. 64. Godolphin and Harley were in close co-operation. Bath MSS., I. 78. In 1692, Bromley had printed a book of travels, in which he expressed violent Jacobite sympathies. Harley re- printed it now and it aided materially in defeating its author. Burnet, V. 229. * Coxe Papers, XVII. 197. Bromley's supporters claimed 250, but Craggs felt certain of only ' ' 200 at the most . . . , if those in the Queen 's service be firm to Mr. Smith." Add. MSS., 4743, f. 44. The ministry was even less confident. THE ELECTION OF 1705 125 getting more and more heated as the minutes progressed. ' ' No affair of this sort had ever been carried with such heat on both sides," 1 but at last, to the relief of all, the vote was taken and Smith won, 248 to 205. The result 2 was a victory for the ministry and the queen, indicating also the great influence the court played in deciding close political contests. It definitely settled the fate of the ' Hackers," who had opposed the wishes of Anne and her ministers, while it marks the beginnings of Whig influence with the queen, an influence which was gradually to increase until their own sense of self- security brought disaster. Both in the defeat of the "tack" and in Smith's election, the Whigs saved Anne and the ministry from a bad fall, and like all politicians, they soon demanded their price. Their importunities gradually caused changes in the ministry, which grew increasingly Whiggish, as the ministerial leaders and the junto were drawn closer together. After the queen had gone through the formality of accepting the new speaker, to whom she later presented a "purse of 1,000 guineas as a token of her satisfaction of his choice," 3 she delivered her address to both houses, calling upon them to support the war vigorously, and bring about a union with Scotland. Though making the usual appeal for public support, Anne displayed real spirit when she spoke of the "tackers." "There are some amongst us, who endeavour to foment animosities," she complained, "but I persuade myself, they will be found very few, when you appear to assist me in dis- countenancing and defeating such practices . . . we may be certain, that they, who go about to insinuate such i Tindal, IV. 183-4. See also Hearne, I. 59-72, passim. 2 Twelfth Eeport (H. M. C), V. 183; Godolphin-Osborne Papers, Add. MSS., 28041, f. 6. 3 Hearne, I. 61. 126 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES things of this nature, must be mine and the kingdom's enemies, and can only mean to cover designs, which they dare not publicly own." 1 Such expressions display her resentment against those who had scorned her preroga- tive and injured her pride. The bitterness she felt against the men who had dared intimate that the church was in danger under her rule, she skilfully turned against them by branding them as disloyal. In this way she gained popular support for the things she wished to do, since the influence of Anne's speeches upon the country must have been, considerable. 2 Anne's speech was but a part of the ministerial pro- gram of carrying the fight to the Tories. The selection of a speaker having shown them how slender was their majority, they began at once to increase it by deciding controverted elections. For obvious reasons, the number of disputed returns was greater than usual, and petitions involving the right to at least sixty-five seats were pre- sented during this parliament. 3 The choice of a suitable chairman for the committee on elections was of super- lative importance to both parties, but after a hard struggle, the ministry prevailed 4 by the slender majority of sixteen, and proceeded immediately to the trial of election petitions. The St. Albans case probably aroused the greatest in- terest. "On Wednesday we sat up till three in the morn- ing upon the St. Albans election, ' ' wrote Harley to Marl- borough, "and this night I suppose we'll finish it about the same hour." Eventually it was decided in favor of i Py. Hist., VI. 452 ; Coke, III. 276. Anne tactfully assumed that the large attendance was due to their great respect for her. 2 Defoe 's Challenge of Peace emphasizes the fact that the whole nation was ' ' particularly attentive ' ' to what she said. 3 C. J., XV. 8-526, passim. Seventeen were to be heard before Christmas. See Luttrell, V. 607-9; Defoe, Legion's Humble Address. * Hearne, I. 70. THE ELECTION OF 1705 127 the Duchess of Marlborough's candidate. 1 The Hertford election also went in favor of the court by a majority of two, 2 although not all the double returns were decided in that way. The case of Leicester "was referred to a com- mittee who resolved that Winstanley . . . was not duly elected, for which there was a thanksgiving in all the Conventicles in and about Leycester; but it being pro- posed to the whole house, a majority dissented from the said resolution . . . and declared Mr. Winstanley duly elected to the great mortification of the Presbyterians and the friends of the knavish and rebellious crew." 3 The Coventry election was set aside on account of mani- fest violence. From the Bedwin depositions it is clear that £5 was a customary bribe and a £10 proffer unusual, and that tenders of money were accepted as a matter of course by a large proportion of the borough electorate. 4 When an election was declared void, or a candidate died, or a member was elected by two or more constitu- encies, a by-election was necessary, and their number was by no means negligible, as during the parliament fifty- six seats were vacated. 5 Consequently, both parties paid scrupulous attention to these by-elections. One of the most interesting of them was that at Marlborough where Lord Bruce spent a large sum to elect his candidate, but i Coxe Papers, XVII. 213; Add. MSS., 4743, f. 49; Hearne, I. 81, 87, 99. The first reference gives the vote 198 to 126, but the Commons Journal (XV. 39.) gives 199 to 142. Much foul practice characterized the activities of both Whigs and Tories, but no adequate proof could be adduced against Lady Marlborough. See Forth MSS., IV. 273. 2 Cowper's Diary, p. 18; C. J., XV. 55. The vote was 199 to 197. 3 Hearne, I. 182. See also C. J., XV. 137; Carte MSS. (Bodl.), CXXV. 94; Luttrell, VI. 11, 14. *Ailesbury MSS. (H. M. C), pp. 190-5. See also Portl. MSS., IV. 199-269. 5 Of these by-elections, 43 were due to deaths, 8 to candidates ' choosing to serve another constituency, 3 to promotions to the peerage, 2 because the candidate had accepted a position of honor and profit from the queen. C. J., XV. 26-616, passim. 128 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES without success, although he was able to gain for him the seat at Bedwin made vacant by Sir George Byng. 1 The Chippenham election was attended with so much violence as to arouse the indignation of Bishop Burnet. 2 As long as the composition of the House of Commons remained undecided, it was impolitic to make further changes in the ministry, but immediately the elections were over, certain alterations were set on foot, which affected the zealous High Churchmen first of all. Roch- ester, Seymour, Nottingham, and Jersey had been dis- missed before the elections. Even Buckingham, of whom Anne was formerly so considerate, had been put aside before the canvass was over. In spite of these changes, the ministry was not as united as its important members desired, and the Highfliers were thoroughly alarmed lest the ministry should become thoroughly Whig on account of the queen's resentment against them. 3 The minis- terial policy, however, was to change the personnel of the cabinet council slowly in favor of moderation, and the next important official upon whom the wrath of the queen and her advisers fell was Sir Nathan Wright, the lord keeper, whose only merit for the position had been his devout High Church attitude. He was notoriously in- efficient, probably corrupt, and the laughing-stock of both parties, 4 but his religiosity appealed to the queen, who w T as unwilling to dismiss on slight grounds any minister i Ailesbury MSS. (H. M. C), pp. 195-6; Py. Hist., VI. 445. 2 H. C. Foxcroft, Supplement to Burnet, p. 513. 3 A year earlier, Dr. Davenant, the pamphleteer, learned ' ' that the struggle now is, not whether the Whigs have any weight and credit, but whether they have all or no." Add. MSS., 4743, f. 154. Defoe said that the ministry was termed Whig by 1705. Conduct of Parties, p. 8. Indeed, there was some question at the time whether Anne might not attempt a dissolution to secure a Whig parliament. J. Ilervey, Letter Books, I. 199; Portl. MSS., IV. 84. Cf. Oldmixon, III. 330. 4 Wright became very rich while in office. Burnet, V. 225. See also the House of Lords MSS. (n. s.), VI. xvii, 260-1; Hearne, I. 53-6. THE ELECTION OF 1705 129 who had come into office during her reign. The Duchess of Marlborough claimed some credit for this dismissal, but Harley's subtle suggestions, coupled with Cowper's ability, made it easier for Anne to consent to his appoint- ment as lord keeper a fortnight before parliament met. 1 Thus the Whigs gained another strong, but moderate member of the ministry. A third Whig, the Earl of Kent, was already in the council, but the junto were still dis- satisfied. Indeed, they wished one of their own number among the queen's advisers, and had urged upon Marl- borough the claims of Sunderland at the time of Notting- ham's dismissal, eighteen months before. Even though the Whigs set forth Sunderland's merits, which the duchess had voiced so often and so long, the duke realized that his son-in-law could not then fill a place in the cabi- net. To Marlborough, Harley's presence in the ministry was imperative, since he alone excelled in the arts of political manipulation, by which majorities were main- tained. 2 Another reason why Sunderland did not find a place in Anne's councils arose from her unconquerable aversion to him, so he was passed over in favor of Harley. The junto kept urging Sunderland's cause in season and out of season. Marlborough still held out against them, as well as the duchess, but when he gave in, Anne remained immovable as ever. After many importunities, she did agree to send him on a foreign mission. Godol- phin insisting upon the Whig demands, she promised him any good place that did not involve close personal rela- i Wharton MSS. (Bodl.), IV. 27-8; Bath MSS., I. 64; Macaulay, p. 2935; Priv. Cor., I. 8. Cowper 's appointment was one of the most important changes in the ministry. 2 Wyon suggests (I. 380) that the duchess wanted Seymour's position as comptroller of the household for Sunderland; apparently he is wrong, as the plan was to make the earl leading secretary, or at least second to Harley. After Harley's appointment, it was reported that Anne had dismissed Secretary Hedges. Godolphin Papers, Add. MSS., 28055, ff. 316, 386. 130 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES tions with the sovereign. The junto indignantly rejected this offer and the lord treasurer told Anne he must resign unless she yielded. Still she remained obdurate, and it took all of Marlborough's infinite patience and prestige, together with certain assurances given by Godolphin, to secure Sunderland's appointment as secretary of state. By this time experience had proved that the moderate administration lacked cohesion, and within a few months, other religious zealots were laid aside. Of the appointive members of the Board of Trade, Weymouth resigned, and three others were removed, including Matthew Prior, John Pollexfen, 1 and William Blathwayt — probably its most active member. They were succeeded by the Earl of Stamford, Lord Herbert of Cherbury, Robert Monck- ton (a friend of Harley), and John Pulteney. Lord Derby succeeded Lord Gower as chancellor for the Duchy of Lancaster. 2 Solicitor-General Harcourt was the lead- ing lawyer among the Tories, but withal a moderate. Anne was willing that he should become speaker, but that project having failed, he was promoted to attorney- general, displacing Sir Edward Northey. Sir James Montagu, a brother of Halifax, became solicitor-general, and Spencer Compton succeeded Edward Nicholas as "Treasurer and Receiver-General to Prince George of Denmark, and Paymaster to her Majesty's pensioners." Numerous promotions were made in the army, and also in the church. Cowper's merit soon brought him the office of lord chancellor; Abingdon gave way to George Churchill as lord lieutenant of the Tower, and Sir George Rooke was dismissed from the Privy Council. 3 i Annals (1707), p. 288; Anglice Notitia (1704), p. 636; Luttrell, VI. 112. 2 Luttrell, VI. 46, 53, 163. It was said that Somers would replace Or- mond as lord lieutenant of Ireland. Hearne, I. 56. See also Bath MSS., I. 96; Forth MSS., IV. 272. 3 P. C. Keg., LXXXI. 359; Priv. Cor., I. 8; Leadam, p. 124; Hearne, I. 51. THE ELECTION OF 1705 131 The Whigs were equally favored in promotions in the peerage, by which they sought to minimize the influence of earlier Tory creations. During the years 1705 and 1706, ten peers were promoted, and one eldest son called to the Lords. Three influential politicians, Godolphin, Cowper, and Sir Thomas Pelham, were created peers. Among the promotions were Argyle, Kent, Montagu, Wharton, Bedford, and Poulett, 1 whose presence in the upper house strengthened the queen and her ministers in their control of that chamber. To what extent these offices and promotions were rewards for services performed or expected, it is difficult to conjecture. That they were so in no inconsiderable degree is attested by Shrewsbury's again refusing to join the ministry even at Marlborough's earnest solicitation, although he was willing to give the duke his proxy, 2 for he knew that joining the ministry meant voting in accord- ance with the wishes of the queen and her ministers, which he was then unwilling to do. After the failure of the "tack," Godolphin wrote: "I shall never think any man fit to continue in his employment who gave his vote for the 'tack,' " 3 "Mr. Wright, Recorder of the city of Oxford is out of favour ... at Court," wrote Hearne, "because he did not appear for Mr. Carter last election." 4 Sir Thomas Hanmer voiced a similar resentment by say- ing that "when he saw some men turned out of their places for not voting as they were bid, he could not help i Sloane MSS. (B. M.), 3065, f. 72; Luttrell, VI. 113; Annals (1706), p. 397. 2 Shrewsb. Cor., pp. 658, 661. See also Portl. MSS., IV. 296. 3 Leadam, p. 66. Godolphin complained earlier that the government would go to pieces, ' ' with no friends to support it, but some few in places. ' ' Portl. MSS., IV. 74. 4 Hearne, I. 160. Colonel Dobyn encountered difficulties because he op- posed the ministerial candidates at St. Albans. lb., I. 122; Portl. 3ISS., IV. 116. 132 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES thinking that others were kept in because they had voted as they were bid." 1 The presence of the same influence is shown by Argyle's letter to Somers, complaining bitterly that some of the court had voted against the min- istry, and he wished them dismissed, though one of his relatives was among the number. Other Whigs agreed that such courtiers should be turned out, but only after the close of parliament. 2 The real feelings of contempo- raries is more effectually presented in the pamphlet, Faults on Both Sides, which laments that the court is acquiring "a new sort of power ... by giving . . . honours, profitable places, and pensions." 3 Although many replies were made to this tract, not one really attempts to answer this criticism of the ministry. An analysis of the votes for speaker shows that only fifteen or sixteen of the queen's servants voted for Brom- ley. Among these was George Clarke, secretary to the prince and second secretary to the board of admiralty, who two days later found himself without a position. 4 The ministry knew that the choice of a speaker depended entirely upon the way the office holders voted, so all the power of the ministers was used in convincing them that John Smith was the only man for whom they could vote with safety. When the election was over, Davenant wrote Harley's henchman, Erasmus Lewis, "there were only five persons in civil employments, who divided against Mr. Smith, viz: Lord Cheney, Sir John Bland, i Hearne, I. 134-5. Coxe in the Coxe Papers (VI. 132) suggests the same thing. zHardwicke State Papers, II. 465-6. Cf. Other Side, p. 261. s See Defoe, Freeholder's Plea; Swift, A New Way of Selling Places at Court; Py. Hist., XIII. 90; House of Lords MSS. (n. s.), V. 559; Lecky, I. 435. iPortl. MSS., IV. 268. One "of these that voted for Mr. Bromley is G. Clarke for which he is turned out of his places, and this is what all must expect that vote honestly and conscientiously. ' ' Hearne, I. 60. THE ELECTION OF 1705 133 Mr. Morley, Mr. Comers, the Equerry, and Mr. Clark." 1 The geographical distribution of the "queen's ser- vants" also indicates the existence of a definite relation between government offices and voting. A contemporary said that they numbered one hundred and twenty-six, of whom seventeen represented Cornish boroughs ; fourteen hailed from the towns of Hampshire ; whereas the Cinque Ports and Wilts were represented by six each. It seems that the area of rotten boroughs was as much over- represented in preferments as in parliament, since Buckinghamshire and Yorkshire had but five each of these placemen, and Wales only three, including Harley and Mansell. 2 It becomes apparent, then, that the queen and her min- isters made extensive use of their appointive power to gain the support of members of parliament, and that once these representatives of the people accepted an office of honor or profit under the crown, they became the agents of the ministry, and were expected to support the court in every measure of importance. Upon their failure to do so, they might be, and usually were, summarily dis- missed. Furthermore, the patronage was used not only to influence the stand of politicians during the progress of elections, but also as a means to attract rising talent into the ranks of the party, by furnishing them a means of livelihood so that they might devote their whole atten- tion to politics. If it were not the custom to reward faithful political i Add. MSS., 4743, f. 44; Coxe Papers, XVII. 197, XLV. 147. Appar- ently the names are given, that official attention may be visited upon them. The equerry no longer held his place in 1708. Anglice Notitia (1708), p. 617. Two of Prince George's grooms of the bedchamber were dismissed partly on account of their political activity. Samuel Masham succeeded one of them. Marlb. MSS., 53. See also Priv. Cor., II. 269. 2 A List of Gentlemen that are in Offices, Employments, etc. 134 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES servants by preferments and peerages, it would be diffi- cult to account for the opposition which developed against the bill which required any member of parliament accept- ing an office under the crown to vacate his seat in the Commons, because, after resigning, the fortunate man might appeal to his constituents for re-election. More- over, it was not the politicians alone who objected so strenuously to such a law, because the queen herself asked her friends to vote against it. 1 She realized that it would limit her power over members of the House of Commons, as many who accepted office under the crown would be replaced in parliament by more independent men, who would oppose, rather than favor, ministerial measures. The cry against such abuses of the patronage had been rife since the increase of the power of parliament after the Revolution. The feeling was widespread that the sovereign should be prevented from keeping the same parliament indefinitely. The Mutiny Bill and the finan- cial necessities of the crown made frequent sessions imperative, but once the king had secured a House of Commons to his liking, he might retain its services in- definitely by such corrupt means as he chose. During William's reign, strenuous endeavors had been made on several occasions to make the members of parliament more representative of the constituencies and less sub- ject to court influence, but except for the Triennial Act, all such efforts were fruitless and corruption increased apace during the early years of the next reign. Anne, however, saw fully as much need for retaining her politi- cal influence as had William, but the reform movement was stronger. That part of the Act of Settlement dis- qualifying those who had "an office or place of profit under the king," had been repealed before it could go i Anne twice requested Dr. Sharp to oppose the bill. Sharp, I. 299. THE ELECTION OF 1705 135 into effect, 1 and thus the way was cleared for passing some law incapacitating the host of placemen who sat in the Commons, or at least, making it more difficult for them to secure seats. As early as 1702, people were saying that the High- fliers planned to strike at the power of the Whigs by re- quiring a large income from land as a qualification for sitting in parliament. 2 "Within a short time, the matter was well under way, but gradually disappeared from notice, 3 while the two houses quarreled over other ques- tions. Two years later, the Tories in the lower house passed a bill excluding from the Commons all persons holding any office created since February, 1684, or that would be provided for in the future. The Lords amended it, and the bill was lost because the Commons refused to consent to the changes. Then the Tories introduced another bill excluding from parliament those who re- ceived any income from the public taxes, but that failed even in the lower house. 4 Keform could not long be delayed. These abortive bills and the repeal of the "revolutionary exclusion" clause of the Act of Settlement brought about the passage of an act two years later, which incapacitated three gen- eral classes from becoming members of parliament : those accepting any office created since October, 1705; those holding pensions from the crown during pleasure; cer- tain specified officials, such as colonial governors, com- missioners of prizes, etc. Any member of parliament accepting an office of profit under the crown must resign i Anson, The Law and Custom of the Constitution (4th ed.), I. 83. 2 House of Lords MSS. (n. s.), V. 200-1; L. J., XVII. 277, 300; Eijka Arehief, 26^ Jan. 3, 1703; C. J., XIV. 277. 3 S. P. Dom., Anne, II. 29. See also Porritt, Unreformed House of Commons, I. 206. 4 Chamberlen, p. 186; Luttrell, V. 508-18, passim. 136 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAKTIES his seat, but he might stand for re-election. 1 The Whig leaders opposed the measure because it would exclude traders and contractors from the Commons and lessen the influence of the commercial classes upon whom they depended for financial support inside and outside of parliament. 2 One strong opponent of the bill hoped that Anne might veto it if it passed, while Godolphin was using all his influence against it because he did not wish the Tories to obtain such an advantage. 3 It is clear, therefore, that courtiers were required to support the queen's measures as set forth by her minis- ters. For minor appointments Anne was not always responsible. In any important change, however, she was consulted, although she had no desire to have her name mentioned in the matter. In most instances both Godol- phin and Marlborough found her mind made up, and they soon became aware that Harley could more easily gain her to their wishes than any other man at court. 4 St. John testified that in granting commissions in his depart- ment, Anne frequently gave the directions herself, a plan which was also employed before he came to the War Office, 5 and was probably in use in other departments. If so, it shows that the queen was to some degree indi- vidually responsible for a large number of appointments, and candidates personally obnoxious to her had difficulty in securing important places, even when political expe- diency suggested their appointment. Early in the reign, Anne forbade her courtiers to traffic i 6 Anne, c. 41. See also Anson, op. cit., I. 83, and 4 & 5 Anne, c. 20. 2 S. P. Dom., Anne, II. 29 A ; Cowper, Diary, pp. 11-2. sCowper, Diary, p. 10; Hanover Papers, Stowe MSS. (B. M.), 222, f. 280. See also Chamberlen, p. 307. * A letter from Godolphin to Harley contains some indications of this as early as May, 1702. Portl. MSS., IV. 39. 5 lb., 219. THE ELECTION OF 1705 137 in court places under penalty of her displeasure. 1 Some- what later, she refused to sign the commission of one "D'Offarell," as major general, because she wished more information about the case. 2 Cowper soon noted that at cabinet council meetings she took a particular interest in all appointments. On one occasion she selected an English judge and a chief baron for Ireland ; on another, she was asked to sanction the appointment of two deputy lieutenants of the Tower. 3 Indeed, her steady insistence upon having her way must have been trying to the party leaders. Three motives prompted Anne's actions. It pleased her vanity ; it kept her closely in touch with state affairs ; last, but not least, it gave her an opportunity to reward her friends and punish her enemies. Such premiums upon compliance with the wishes of the queen and her ministers, and penalties upon obstinate refusals, had much influence in carrying out ministerial policies. Her attitude in the entire matter is manifest in her conduct towards the Pretender and the Hanoverians. In her struggle against James II and later against William III, she had, as princess, been supported by the Marlboroughs. With the death of her father and her own accession, it might be expected that her attitude toward the Pretender would be influenced by the Duchess of Marlborough. In consequence, her position was most embarrassing. The Pretender was her brother, and by hereditary right the throne belonged to him. Yet he was being reared as a Catholic,* and his followers were in i Luttrell, V. 193. 2 Ellis Papers, Add. MSS., 28892, f. 357. 3 Strickland, XII. 125-34; S. P. Dom., Anne, VIII. 22. Once she ordered Cowper to bring the roll of the sheriffs to the council meeting. See his Diary, pp. 5-25, passim. Later she wrote that two officials who "had done wrong in Parliament" must be removed. Marlb. MSS., p. 53. * Anne 's opposition to his Catholicism is unquestioned. See Thomas, pp. 138 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES spirit traitors to the crown. 1 On the other hand, she was the sovereign through an act of parliament, which had guaranteed the succession. Just before her accession, she wrote Lady Marlborough: "I am not apt to believe all the reports one hears, so I cannot give in to the opinion that there are many Jacobites in England but I'm as well satisfied as you can be that those that are so are as much enemies as the Papists, and I am very sensible these people will always have designs against me; for as long as the young man [Pretender] in France lives (which by the course of nature will be longer than me) nobody can doubt but there will be plots against my crown and life; you may be sure I'll take as much care of both as I can, and I should be very glad to know what care [you] . . . would have me take of myself and . . . would have me do." Of these lines, the duchess wrote, "It is plain she does not intend to put herself in the hands of the Jacobites, and I never could observe that she had any scruples about wearing the crown, nor any inclination towards those that were in that interest, if she believed them so, tho' she always loved the Tories, because she believed they would be for her against her brother, and I believe to the last that Mrs. Masham's ministers never ventured further . . . than to persuade her that it was best for the Protestant religion for him to come after her death." 2 Later, Anne acknowledged "that she was not sure the Prince of Wales was her brother, and that it was not practicable for him to come here without ruin to religion and the country." 3 Her independence is plainly indicated, and the duchess recognized that here, 85, 91; Remusat, I. 286; Stoughton, 'Religion in England, p. 6. See her speech before parliament at its dissolution in 3 702; Py. Hist., VI. 25. i Coxe Papers, XV. 76. See Marlb. MSS., p. 53. 2 Marlb. MSS., p. 52. s From Blenheim Papers, printed in Reid, p. 107. THE ELECTION OF 1705 139 at least, was a question which even Anne's most intimate friends dared not raise with impunity. The case was the same with reference to her legal suc- cessors. It was unfortunate that she disliked all the members of the Hanoverian family. It is even pathetic that she, like her Tudor prototype, should feel such repugnance even at the mention of her successor's name, while her soul revolted at the very idea of bringing him to England. But her convictions were absolutely fixed. "But those of the Whigs . . . little knew how imprac- ticable the project of [the] invitation was, and that the attempt would have only served to make the Queen dis- card her ministry, to the ruin of the common cause of these kingdoms and of all Europe." So wrote the duchess, and added, "I have often tried her Majesty upon this subject; and when I found that she would not hear of the successor's coming over, had pressed her that she would at least invite hither the young Prince of Hanover who was not to be her immediate successor, and that she would let him live here as her son, but her Majesty would listen to no proposal of this kind in any shape whatsoever." 1 Had Anne consented to this wise suggestion, she would have saved herself as well as her statesmen endless worry, for as long as she failed to come out enthusiasti- cally for the Electress Sophia and her descendants, she encouraged the faction at St. Germain and the Jacobites in believing that she was willing to have her half brother succeed her. Moreover, it misled the French, who felt that Anne's tenderness for the Chevalier might lead her at any time to make peace. 2 Such a fear certainly lay in i Conduct, p. 150; Coxe Papers, XXIII. 397. Miss Strickland says that Sarah poisoned Anne's mind against the Electress Sophia, but fails to cite any evidence. Queens, XII. 120, 131-2. 2 Louis XIV and his ambassadors failed to understand Anne 's feelings, 140 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAKTIES the minds of some of the Dutch statesmen, and caused even the better informed English ministers no little dis- quietude, as they were unable to complete arrangements for carrying out the Act of Settlement or take any pre- cautions against a revolutionary uprising at Anne's death for several years after her accession. Further- more, it gave disgruntled Highfliers an unexampled op- portunity of annoying the queen and her advisers, because she was obsessed with the idea that by some trick, one of the political parties would get an address through one or both houses to invite over the Protestant heir, or that uninvited, Sophia or one of her grandchildren would, by the connivance of some influential Whig or Tory, come to London. English political intrigues had reached Hanover and disturbed their quiet, dividing the court into two factions. Sophia was perhaps slightly Tory in her sympathies, although she tried to keep the balance even between the disturbers. Her son, the elector, was openly Whig, and Anne had for him a "great aversion." 1 The queen's alarm was not diminished by a letter from the aged but still charming electress, who was somewhat at odds with the elector. Having been repeatedly solicited by some officious personages 2 to come to England, Sophia took full cognizance of their communications, and wrote to Anne, "that the message came from such as were enemies to as they were ready to guarantee the security of her throne, if she should take measures to have the Prince of Wales succeed her. Portl. MSS., IV. 259; Klopp (X. 6) believed that Anne grew nearer to the Pretender after Prince George 's death. i Seward's Anecdotes, II. 294, quoted from Toland's Travels in Prussia (1703); Macpherson, II. 178-9; Marlb. MSS., p. 52. 2 Notably Rochester, Gwynne, Hutton, Edward Howe, and Scott. For the diplomatic aspects of this perplexing question, see Mackintosh Papers, Add. MSS., 34521, f. 61, passim; S. P. For., German States, CLXII. passim; Hanoverian Papers, Stowe MSS. (B. M.), 222, passim; Coxe Papers, XIX. 163-4, 171; XXIII. 152, 197; Sharp, I. 271-2. THE ELECTION OF 1705 141 her family. That she would never hearken to such a proposal, but when it came from the Queen . . . her- self." 1 The plain implication was that the electress expected an invitation from the queen. Instead of reassuring Anne that she had nothing to fear from the Hanoverian family, this message increased her apprehensions, show- ing her to what ends the disaffected in England were likely to go in embarrassing her. Her fears were not groundless. Two days after Sophia's letter was read before _the council, Anne wrote in haste to Marlborough: "The disagreeable proposal of bringing some of the House of Hanover into England (which I have been afraid of so long) is now very near being brought into both Houses of Parliament, which gives me a great deal of uneasiness, for I am of a temper always to fear the worst. There has been assurances given that Mr. Shutes [the Hanoverian envoy] should have instructions to dis- courage the proposition, but as yet, he has said nothing of them, which makes me fear there may be some altera- tion in their resolution in the Court of Hanover. I shall depend upon your friendship and kindness to set them right in notions of things here, and if they will be quiet, I may do so, too, or else I must expect to meet with a great many mortifications." 2 The zealous High Churchmen, disgruntled by their defeat on the Occasional Conformity Bill and the "tack," sought revenge by taking up the question of the succes- sion. They knew that the Whigs were anxious to have the electress or one of her descendants in England, as a guarantee against the Pretender, an arrangement to which Anne would never consent. The Tories felt, i Cowper, Diary, 11 November, 1705; Manchester, Court and Society, II. 214. 2 Marlb. MSS., p. 52. 142 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES therefore, that if they raised this question, the Whigs would be in a dilemma. If the- Whigs favored the meas- ure, they would certainly alienate Anne ; if they opposed it, they would lose support in Hanover. 1 Naturally enough, the Tories hoped to discredit their adversaries and gain the ear of the queen. As early as 1704, Roch- ester had suggested such a maneuver, but it was not until the following year that Haversham moved in the Lords that the electress should be invited over as the heir apparent. The issue was now clear and the Whigs must get out of the difficulty as best they could, because such leading Tories as Buckingham, Rochester, Notting- ham — all of them until recently Anne's favorites — were certain to give the resolution their enthusiastic support. 2 Although Anne might consider as a personal affront the actions of those statesmen who had so recently voted for Bromley as speaker, she was affected in a still more vital way by the problem of the succession, which had both personal and religious aspects that came very close to her heart. Already the Tories had touched her to the quick when they had insinuated that the church was in danger, and she paid her compliments to them imme- diately afterwards. The Tories thus learned how easy it was to annoy her, and shortly after the session opened, the disgruntled "tackers" continued their assault upon the ministry. The Whigs were worried, as was the queen. The latter conceived that her attendance upon the debates might mitigate the rancor of the speakers, so she was present incognito in the Lords during the discussion. 3 Her i Mackintosh Papers, Add. MSS., 34521, ff. 43-4; Macpherson, I. 690. 2 Sharp, I. 307-8; House of Lords MSS., VI. (n. s.), xxii.-xxiv.; Hearne, I. 82, 90; Memoirs of Halifax, pp. 132-6; Annals (1705), p. 195; Bagot MSS. (H. M. C), p. 341; Marlborough himself thought of inviting over the electoral prince, it seems. Portl. MSS., IV. 490. 3 Burnet, V. 182; House of Lords MSS. (n. s.), VI. ii. THE ELECTION OF 1705 143 presence may have calmed somewhat the more audacious debaters, though Haversham, the most voluble of the high Tories, and Buckingham spoke in a brutal fashion, insist- ing that there was no real guarantee for the Protestant succession, if the Pretender could reach England in three days, while it took a Hanoverian as many weeks. Buck- ingham even insinuated that Anne might survive her faculties and "be like a child in the hands of others." 1 These hot-headed Tories did not reckon on the Stuart queen's spirit, which had become thoroughly aroused. She had already begun to rally around her some stanch and influential supporters. Not only had she called upon Marlborough, but the Archbishop of York as well. "A message had been sent by the Queen," he wrote in his diary, "to order me to wait on her at five o'clock . . . her business was to tell me that she had heard that a motion would be made in our house to send for the Princess of Hanover, in .pursuance of what my Lord Rochester had threatened in a speech the last Parliament, and to persuade me to use my interest with my friends not to come into the motion." Nor did she let him go until he had given his promise to oppose the plan, which was "nothing but a pique to her Majesty." At her re- quest, the archbishop called upon Rochester to induce him to abandon the obnoxious motion, but he refused, insisting that the motion was reasonable, if, he added significantly, "we really meant that the House of Hanover should succeed after the Queen's death." Sharp did his best to check the plans of the Highfliers, but a few days later, Anne sent for him again, because "she had heard the business of the heir of Hanover would be moved in both houses and therefore she desired me to take occa- sion ... to tell everybody my sense of it. ' ' 2 ipy. Hist., VI. 457-68; Conduct, 160. 2 Sharp, I. 308-9. 144 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES All Anne 's efforts to keep the motion out of parliament were fruitless. Yet she had given warning, and her friends hurried to her support. In addition, two members of the junto, Somers and Halifax, opposed the motion with all their eloquence, 1 which was sufficient, when coupled with Whig votes, to overwhelm both Nottingham and Rochester, who insisted that the succession could never be safe so long as the heir apparent lived outside the realm. Despite Lady Marlborough's pessimism, the ministry was able to defeat the project, and, aided by independent Whigs and moderate Tories, 2 even went further in vindicating the queen. The ministry, aided by the junto, decided to brave the wrath of the Hanoverian heir and gain Anne's grateful thanks. Anne, still fearful lest this measure come up again, insisted that her supporters, now flushed with victory, should carry the struggle into the camp of the enemy. 3 Certain of success, they seized upon the Tory contention that the succession was in danger, to provide against all contingencies due to the absence of the heir apparent, in case of the queen's sudden death, which was quite probable, on account of her chronic attacks of gout. Bishop Burnet proposed a regency to assume temporary control of affairs upon her death. Such a bill, providing i Hearne, I. 90. The Whigs argued that it would be an extra expense to keep up the court, and it was contrary to Anne's wishes. Halifax and Somers had been cultivating the friendship of the Hanoverians and their explanations to the elector and to Sophia make interesting reading. Hanover Papers, Stowe MSS. (B. M.), 222, ff. 444-5; Morrison, II. 226-8. 2C. J., XV. 65; L. J., XVIII. 18; Coxe Papers, XVII. 221, XV. 76; Add. MSS., 9094. Among the moderate Tories, St. John, Harcourt, and Boyle opposed the motion. Hanover Papers, Stowe MSS. (B. M.), 222, ff. 245-6. Bawlinson MSS. (Bodl.), C, 983, f. 170, contains an unfavorable view of the Whig party, to which is ascribed the desire to set up an aristocratic republic at Anne's death. 3 See diary entry in Sharp, I. 310. Apparently in its original form, the bill was exceedingly complex. Frankland-Eussell-Astley MSS. (H. M. C), p. 190. THE ELECTION OF 1705 145 for seven lords justices to take over the government of the kingdom "in case of the Queen's demise till the next successor arrives in the kingdom," 1 was brought in, thor- oughly discussed and passed. The heir was also to be invited to select the names of such persons as he should like, to co-operate with those appointed by parliament. As additional security, the Privy Council was to con- tinue for six months after the queen's death unless sooner terminated by the new sovereign, 2 while parliament was to remain in session after her death. The ministry was not yet satisfied, much less the queen. At their instance, parliament passed an "Act of Naturalization," making citizens of all Protestants of the electoral family. 3 The triumph of the ministry was almost complete; the queen was pleased at the discom- fiture of the Tories; the electress, flattered by such marked attention from parliament. The ministry next took up the Tory cry that the church was in danger, a charge which Anne bitterly resented, and an animated discussion ensued in the Lords, which ended in a resolu- tion setting forth that "under the happy reign of her Majesty, the Church is in a most safe and flourishing condition, and whosoever goes about to suggest that the Church is in danger is an enemy to the Queen, the Church i Hearne, I. 92; L. J., XVII. 22; C. J., XV. 51. 2 4 & 5 Anne, c. 20. In this work Sharp took a prominent part, despite the general opposition of the more zealous Highfliers, and voted against the proposition that the lord mayor of London be added to the list of Lords Justices, as it was clearly a Tory move. Nottingham had better success with his resolution that these regents should not have power to change the Act of Uniformity, the Test Act, or the Habeas Corpus Act. Sharp, I. 310; Timberland, II. 152. Lord Hervey protested against the bill, "as the falsest step that ever was made by any set of men." Letter Books, p. 219. 3 4 & 5 Anne, c. 16; Mackintosh Papers, Add. MSS., 34521, ff. 43-4. For details concerning the passage of this act, consult House of Lords MSS., VI. (n. s.), 329-36; C. J., XV. 47-54; L. J., XVIII. 39-59; Le Strange MSS. (H. M. C), p. 115; Luttrell, V. 617-9. 146 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES and the Kingdom." To this emphatic motion the Com- mons agreed, 1 and the queen was at last revenged upon her enemies. The High Churchmen had been routed on every hand. The ministry was victorious, and it remained for them to reward the Whigs who had co-operated so faithfully; for, despite the efforts of the ministers and the worthy archbishop, a victory could not have been won without the junto. Long had they clamored for office, and just as persistently had Anne refused to listen to them; but as soon as they had agreed to support her measures, she was ready to reward them, if their demands were not exorbitant. Fortunately for them, the Whigs and the \ ministry pleased the queen on the three questions most vital to her: religion, the succession, and the union, and in each case, the junto and the "inner cabinet" had by the beginning of 1707 prevailed over the Tories, who were i suffering from the lack of efficient leadership, as Harley and St. John now belonged to the ministry. As the Whigs felt their power, they demanded more influence; in the meantime, the junto spent every available moment in per- fecting their organization. For the nonce, they were willing to aid Godolphin, although their ceaseless impor- tunities almost drove him frantic. He found himself unable to grant all their demands, since Anne was still reluctant to admit even moderate Whigs into her councils. To what extent the queen's hesitation was due to ad- vice she may have received from others at court, is a problem which has never been satisfactorily solved. In approaching the question, it is necessary to show how the leading ministers lost power to the junto, 2 as well as i Py. Hist., VI. 506. In the Lords, the vote was 61 to 30 ; in the Com- mons, 212 to 162. Memoirs of Halifax, pp. 132-6; Timberland, II. 160. 2 The co-operation of the junto began as early as August, 1706. Portl. MSS., II. 196. THE ELECTION OF 1705 147 to examine the steps by which the Whigs gradually rose in Anne's councils to a commanding position, which was made more certain by the election of 1708. The first Whig accessions to the ministry were Kent, Newcastle, and Cowper. The difficulties surrounding Sunderland's appointment make it in reality a critical period in the early history of the Whig party, and it is a commentary upon the power of the junto, that they could demand and secure from Marlborough a price for their support which he did not want to pay. However, the aid of the junto was imperative, if the ministry was to carry on its policies against the Tory opposition. Marlborough, Godolphin, and Harley, all conceded this, and the only question open was how to secure their co-operation at the least cost. Advances to the Whigs had been made as early as the middle of 1705, but the alliance was not formally sealed until the admis- sion of Newcastle and Cowper to the ministry. The latter described the dinner given by Harley to cement the union between the Whigs and the court. At this political feast, there were present St. John, Boyle, Cowper, and Sunderland, in addition to Harley, Marl- borough, and Godolphin. Somers was invited, but ex- cused himself, 1 a fact which, if taken in connection with Wharton's absence, would indicate that the working agreement between the junto and the ministry was not as yet complete. Although only a single member of the junto had been taken into the ministry, it is evident that some sort of secret arrangement between the leading ministers and Whig leaders must have existed by that time, since all Godolphin 's plans with reference to Hanover and Scotland passed through parliament with- out a jar, a proceeding scarcely probable, had not the i Cowper, Diary, Jan. 6, 1706. See also Mahon, I. 234. 148 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES Whigs voted under a clear understanding with the ministers. 1 Thus in the two years between the battle of Blenheim and the appointment of Sunderland, Anne had increased her popularity ; with her aid, the ministry had secured in the election of 1705 a new parliament committed to the vigorous persecution of the war; with her hearty sup- port, the Highfliers, whom she had already dismissed from office, were again routed by the defeat of Bromley for speaker ; through her lively interest in the patronage, the power of the ministry was increased; at her steady insistence, the plan to bring over the Hanoverian heir to the throne was thwarted and safeguards set up against any attempt of the Jacobites to disturb the Protestant succession. However powerful the junto may have become by 1707, it is clear that the wishes of the queen had been respected up to this time in almost every detail ; in religion, in diplomacy, in appointments, and in the succession, she had made her influence felt, and she looked forward with the greatest anticipation to the completion of the union with Scotland. i This agreement may have been kept from the queen, who disliked Wharton almost as much as she did Sunderland, and would probably have refused to eo -operate in advancing the interests of the Whigs. CHAPTER IV THE DISRUPTION OF THE MINISTRY (1707-1708) By the end of the fourth year of her reign, the queen had gained her wishes in regard to the Highfliers and the Hanoverian family. She had become definitely alienated from the more vehement Tories, and with the aid of the Marlboroughs, Godolphin, and Harley, sought to secure the position of arbiter between the two political factions, while standing aloof from each of them. The ministry had become thoroughly consolidated in its struggles against the Highfliers, and when Sunderland at last joined the cabinet, the Whig junto co-operated with the chief ministers. The queen was justly proud of all that had been achieved, but she had another object dearer to her heart by far than anything that had yet been accom- plished, for, to her mind, the reign would be a failure unless she succeeded in joining Scotland, the ancestral home of her race, to England, in a parliamentary as well as a personal union. The people of Scotland were mainly of Celtic blood, and since the Anglo-Saxon invasions, they had been at odds with England. Scotland's national heroes, such as Wallace and Bruce, had gained their fame by fighting the English. On various occasions, the Scots had openly sided with France, England's hereditary enemy, much to the annoyance of the English sovereigns, particularly the Tudors. These unfortunate conditions were some- what remedied when, at the death of Elizabeth, James 150 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES Stuart became joint sovereign of England and Scotland. But the change was but a half measure, as each kingdom retained its own legislature; and as their interests were not always identical, friction frequently developed be- tween them. 1 In addition to the inherent racial differences, the ques- tion of religion complicated political matters. England was Anglican, while Scotland had become devoutly Pres- byterian, and had assisted in overthrowing Charles I. After Cromwell's brief rule, and the reign of Charles II, William III acknowledged Presbyterianism as the estab- lished religion of the Scots before he could be at peace with them. He did his best to make the union of the kingdoms closer, but in vain. Anne was fully as deter- mined as William to accomplish it, and worked with a decided advantage, since the Scots never forgot that she was one of their own princesses. At the beginning of her reign, she raised the question of the union in her first speech to both houses. One of her first official acts was to appoint the Duke of Queensberry a commissioner to negotiate it, and on every conceivable occasion, she kept urging its advantage on Scots and English alike. 2 Many things impelled the ministry towards union. The flourishing Jacobite sentiment in Scotland would then meet with greater embarrassment ; the French could no longer make Scotland the center of their far-reaching conspiracies against England; 3 while the commercial i The government of Scotland during this trying period is ably dis- cussed in Porritt, Unreformed House of Commons, II. Pt. 1. 2 Godolphin Papers, Add. MSS., 28070, f. 8 ; S. P. Dom., Anne, III. 13 ; Nottingham Papers, Add. MSS., 29588, ff. 375-6 ; Marlb. MSS., p. 53. s Hanover Papers, Stowe MSS. (B. M.), 223, ff. 10, 25-9; Hearne, I. 46; Leslie Stephen, Life of Swift, p. 63. Numerous cipher letters in the Carte MSS. (Bodl.), particularly vol. 210, ff. 27-48, give the impression that the Jacobites were exceptionally strong in Scotland, but Defoe's Bevieiv (vol. II. passim) creates a different impression. THE DISRUPTION OF THE MINISTRY 151 position of both "North and South Britain" would be greatly benefited by their union under the same laws. Difficult as racial, political, and religious matters made Anglo-Scottish relations, the growing importance of com- merce made it still more involved. As the trade of Eng- land developed, the canny Scots began to realize that they were being outdistanced. Their discontent increased accordingly, and led them to embark upon the Darien expedition, which, by virtue of their tremendous igno- rance, was from the first doomed to utter failure. 1 The collapse of this speculative bubble ruined the Scots, and their poverty made them more willing to listen to English negotiations. On the other hand, this same extension of commerce, coupled with the problems of the succession and the war, made the English ministry exceedingly anxious for a union with Scotland. 2 Few negotiations have been conducted with greater skill than the preliminaries of the union between England and Scotland, as the slightest accident might have brought them to a sudden and unfortunate conclusion. The Scots were jealous of the Act of Settlement, and when the Darien venture failed, they passed a law providing that for the future, succession to the Scottish throne should in no case be the same as the English. England retal- iated, forbidding the Scots to trade with England in any i For further details of this tragedy, consult J. S. Barbour, Hist, of Wil- liam Paterson, and the Darien Company; H. Bingham, "The Early History of the Darien Company," Scottish Hist. Rev., III.; Burnet, IV. 113, 147; Mahon, I. 282. 2 The latest word upon the union is P. Hume Brown's The Legislative Union of England and Scotland. This author has also recently edited Sea- field's letters to Godolphin about the union. Even with Hume Brown's scholarly works on our tables, we cannot dispense with Defoe's History of the Union, written from observation. On the general phases of the union, see also Mackinnon, Union of England and Scotland (1695-1745). A later and briefer work is W. L. Mathieson, Scotland and the Union. 152 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES way, but repealed the act in 1705. 1 Happily, the English ministry allowed their propositions to be handled in Scotland by Queensberry, 2 whom no violent Jacobite threats served to move in the least from his line of action. Of course, the English leaders, notably Godolphin and Harley, made his way easy, as they were too well aware of the importance of the union to be niggardly in their treatment of the impecunious Scottish representatives. Harley 's knowledge of the temperament of these leg- islators was excellent; no secretary of state could have been better served by agents, spies, and informers than he, because few secret service men have ever displayed such genius for work of this sort as did Defoe 3 and his companions. In the light of what happened later, it has been the custom to despise the efforts of Greg, one of Harley 's agents in Scotland, but his letters to the secre- tary of state during the progress of negotiations seems to show that at this time he was both a careful observer and a faithful servant,* who did much to keep the min- istry informed of Scottish affairs. In these negotiations Harley took a prominent part even before his appoint- ment as secretary. William Paterson kept him in touch with the economic side of the negotiations, Seafield in- formed him of all political developments, while the ver- satile author of Robinson Crusoe attended to both sides of the question in a sympathetic, thoroughgoing, and impartial manner. Through the skill of these men, Har- ley and Godolphin were kept thoroughly posted of the i Py. Hist., VI. 368-74; James, III. 267, 282; L. J., XVII. 583. 2 Hanover Papers, Stowe MSS. (B. M.), 233, ff. 10, 25-9. After the union, Queensberry became the political leader and manipulator of Scot- land. Porritt, supra cit., II. 89, 128, 147-58. 3 Consult his letters to Harley. Portl. MSS., IV. 200, sq. ; Conduct of Parties, p. 13. 4 See Portl. MSS., IV. 205, 346. THE DISRUPTION OF THE MINISTRY 153 exact status of the negotiations. 1 Progress came slowly, and amid numerous difficulties. At last, somewhat to the surprise of both English and Scots, the treaty of union was agreed to by the commissioners, and then submitted to their respective parliaments for acceptance. In the English parliament, it was expected to pass, because the queen was supporting the ministry. How- ever, in discussing the Scottish Act at the beginning of 1705, it had been found that Godolphin lacked influence in parliament and seemed to be sinking into his dotage. All the ministry realized that he would be most bitterly attacked by the Tories, and the queen thought her attend- ance might cause the debaters to moderate their attacks upon him, so she was present during the debates, "at first on the throne, and after, it being cold, on a bench at the fire." Unfortunately her presence did not have the effect anticipated. Rochester and Nottingham for the Tories, as well as Somers and Halifax for the Whigs, failed to spare Godolphin, who never appeared to less advantage. Dartmouth witnessed that he "talked non- sense very fast, which was not his usual way either of matter or manner." 2 As a result, actual fear as to the fate of the articles of union prevailed among the English ministers, when the bill came before parliament two years later. Anne and her councillors planned most skilfully. They had postponed the meeting of the English parliament in i Paterson also supplied Godolphin with information. Portl. MSS., IV. 331. Seafield's work was both accurate and invaluable. lb., 276, sq. The Earl of Cromartie's letters to Godolphin are also full. Morrison, I. 35. Carstares' correspondence is extensive. Portl. MSS., VI., VII. passim. For other letters to Harley about Scotland, see ib., IV. 250, sq. 2 Burnet, V. 179; Cunningham, II. 78. Mahon is beyond the mark when he says : ' ' His fire indeed was nearly burned out and it might almost be said of him that henceforth during the remainder of his life he played but a subordinate part in his own administration." Queen Anne, p. 166. 154 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES 1706 until the Commissioners for the Union had com- pleted their work, and the Scottish parliament had nearly- concluded its deliberations. The queen's address from the throne as the session opened, was calculated to ad- vance the cause of the union, and the reception accorded Marlborough upon his return from the Continent took up much of the time of parliament in its opening session, but this exaltation of the military hero was intended to have practical results, since it was hoped that the glory which had come to British arms abroad might lead the Scots and English alike to look upon the complete union of the two nations with more complaisance. Moreover, the English public had been educated to the advisability and advantages of the union, through the publication of a large number of interesting pamphlets ; and when the vote came, the English parliament accepted the articles of union without much difficulty. In the legislature of Scotland, the outcome was more doubtful, as the local patriotism of the Scot was intense. The English ministers, at this point, displayed great finesse; for, instead of attempting the crude method of bribing influential members of the assembly, they pre- ferred the more circuitous, but fully as effective plan of agreeing to pay the delinquent salaries of the needy Scottish officials, and assume Scotland's share of the war debt. 1 The pourparlers had been long and tiresome. Throughout, Scottish jealousy and English indifference threatened the failure of the plan so dear to the queen, but with her insistence, 2 Harley's tact, and Godolphin's i Despite the Tory claim, there was no crass corruption. Burton, I. 484- 94; Brown, Legislative Union, pp. 126-8; Burnet, V. 301-3. For the old view see Life of her late Majesty (1721), I. 423; Lockhart Papers, I. 327. 2 The Hatton-Finch Papers, Add. MSS., 29548, f . 29, contains a letter of Anne to Queensberry, which shows her great interest in the negotiations. Another of her letters in Godolphin Papers, Add. MSS., 28070, f. 4, shows how she trusted him. Anne later became enraged at the obstinate opposi- THE DISRUPTION OF THE MINISTRY 155 honesty and attitude of compromise, the Scots under the leadership of Queensberry and Hamilton were brought into line. 1 To no one statesman or group of statesmen can be accorded the honor of uniting England and Scotland. Most of the praise must go to the queen, Godolphin, and Harley; although in the distribution of praise, Defoe, Seafield, and Queensberry must not be forgotten. Nor to the court alone goes all the glory for the treaty, as its ratification at Westminster depended upon the support of the Whigs. Although at first the Tories apparently favored the union, as the movement progressed, their leaders fought incessantly against it, on the grounds that it was unfavorable to England, and granted too much to the Scottish Presbyterians. The fears of English church- men brought forth against the treaty the eloquence of Hooper, Beveridge, and other bishops, but they more than met their match in debate with Burnet and the junto, who maintained that the danger to England lay not in the Dissenters, but in France and Catholicism. 2 Num- bers, too, favored the Whigs, and once more the Tory zealots were forced to accept defeat at the hands of the ministry, after they had again discredited themselves with the queen, whose memory of such actions was too apt to be vindictive. In such an epochal undertaking, there is praise enough for all, because the union marks a milestone in the history of the empire, as well as in the history of England. It tion of the Scots to the appointment of Lord Forfar. Add. MSS., 28070, f. 10. A personal letter from Anne to Queensberry is in Add. MSS., 12093, f. 18, while Halifax's letter to Godolphin as to Anne's relation to the negotiations is found in Godolphin Papers, Add. MSS., 28055, f. 300. i See Lockhart Papers, I. 133 ; G. W. T. Ormond, Fletcher of Saltoun, p. 127. 2 Burnet, V. 295; Marchmont MSS. (H. M. C), p. 158; Seafield MSS. (H. M. C), PP- 192-8. 156 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES made a closer union between Celt and Anglo-Saxon, be- tween Presbyterian and Anglican, which was the begin- ning of the end for the Jacobites. For the Scots, it meant greater economic and political freedom, as well as the opportunity to act as pioneers in the British empire arising beyond the seas; 1 for the English, a steady ally, rather than a treacherous neighbor. As soon as the articles of union had been agreed upon in March, 1707, Anne came to the Lords to pass the act in the customary form. She could not refrain from ex- pressing her satisfaction at what had been accomplished, and entreated her "subjects of both nations [to] . . . act with all possible respect and kindness to one another, that it may appear to all the world that they have hearts disposed to become one people." 2 Such advice was sorely needed, as only a few weeks passed before the commercial provisions of the treaty brought trouble. It had been agreed that from May 1, 1707, freedom of trade should exist between England and Scotland. Merchants, who had been accustomed to pay heavy import duties to bring goods into England, found it more profitable now to ship goods to Scottish ports, where the duties were low, and reship them to England after May 1. The English naturally objected to the methods of these quick-witted traders, and the Commons passed a law prohibiting the free importation into Eng- land of goods landed in Scotland a short time before the union. The peers realized that by sanctioning the bill, they would cause the Scots to doubt England's sincerity, and endanger the permanence of the union. As a result, they refused to pass it. To lessen the heat among the Commoners, and to prevent, if possible, a clash between i Porritt, Unreformed House of Commons, II. 89, sq.; W. C. Webster, General History of Commerce, p. 178. 2 Py. Hist., VI. 576. THE DISRUPTION OF THE MINISTRY 157 the houses, Anne resorted to a week's prorogation. The lower house continued obstinate, however, and sent up a second bill to the Lords. A quarrel, which seemed now inevitable, was obviated by the queen's tact in proroguing parliament. 1 The union itself is a splendid illustration of what a unified ministry could do with the aid of the queen, but Sunderland's attempt to become a member of the cabinet council gives us a clear idea of the relative influence of the various ministers, since in this case, the " inner cabi- net" was divided, and Anne sided with the minority. Godolphin and Marlborough eventually triumphed over her wishes, partly on account of the importunities of the Whigs and the duke's military prowess, but more largely it would seem, from the political necessity of unanimity in the council while the all-important matter of the union was under way. Such unity of purpose in the ministry was soon seen to be temporary, as it was obvious by the close of 1706 that differences of opinion had already risen. Sunder- land and the duchess knew that Harley had sought to prevent Sunderland 's entry into the ministry. The short prorogation of parliament incensed this impetuous young Whig and republican, who insisted that Harley was re- sponsible for Anne's action. 2 Henceforth, almost steady strife existed in the ministry, for Sunderland was a rest- less individual with many of the characteristics of the born agitator, showing an almost uncanny ability to do the wrong thing at just the moment to occasion the great- est difficulty to his associates. This was true in Spanish affairs. Only one able Eng- lish general had been sent to the peninsula — the impetu- ous and highly eccentric Earl of Peterborough, who won iW. Coxe, Memoirs of Eobert Walpole, II. 8; Py. Hist., VI. 577-81. 2Mahon, 287; Coxe, II. 35. ,' 158 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES marvelous victories while violating every canon of mili- tary science. One of Sunderland's first official acts was to recall Peterborough, thus giving free reign to the rivalry of Galway and Rivers, which brought about the debacle at Almanza. 1 Only a few weeks later, the English learned that Admiral Shovel's fleet had met a great dis- aster off the Scilly Isles and the admiral had lost his life. 2 These two disasters weakened the influence of the ministry. Had Marlborough been able to do anything to relieve the gloom, it would have been well for them, but the selfishness of the Dutch and Imperial authorities, coupled with the refusal of the French commanders to give him battle, prevented this consummation, while dur- ing his inactivity, his allies were badly defeated on the Rhine. Such reverses discouraged the Dutch, and Buys, one of their leading statesmen, began to talk about ' ' rea- sonable" terms of peace. 3 Louis XIV took heart, and imagined it would be easy to negotiate a peace, if he could gain the support of Marl- borough, who was by no means sanguine as to the out- come of the conflict. The duke was fully aware that victory alone could make him popular in England, and popularity alone would enable him to remain one of Anne's influential advisers. Without her aid, he believed it would be futile to attempt any great military exploits in the face of Tory hatred, court jealousy, and popular disfavor. Marlborough knew the weakness of Godolphin, and his liveliest fears as to Sunderland were being realized, for the latter began to quarrel with Harley. Moreover, Sunderland's influence over the duchess increased her proselyting activity with the queen in favor of the Whigs, i A. Parnell, The War of the Succession in Spain, eh. xxiv. 2 Annals (1707), 241-2. 3Coxe, II. 44, 105; Luttrell, VI. 174. THE DISRUPTION OF THE MINISTRY 159 which was certain to arouse all of Anne's hereditary obstinacy, and reduce the influence of the ministers. Worst of all, Lady Marlborough began to absent herself from court for long intervals. At the same moment that he had brought Scottish affairs to a happy conclusion, Grodolphin, too, began to realize that the queen's attitude was growing more inde- pendent. In diplomacy, she insisted upon interfering more and more; in civil appointments, she raised more questions than had been her custom; and in church affairs, she practically demanded a free hand. For a time he knew only that she was unfriendly towards his policies, but it was months before he became aware that she was acting upon the suggestions and confidential advice of others. 1 It is indeed strange that the Marlboroughs or Godol- phin should not have recognized this earlier. However, it took some important event to bring the facts home to them. This enlightening incident fell in the domain of ecclesiastical affairs. For over five years, Grodolphin had exercised at least a nominal control over the selection of the queen's civil servants and over the policy of the crown. One' would not expect Godolphin's supervision over the queen's ecclesiastical appointments to be so close, for she was particularly interested in religious affairs, and might naturally insist upon having even more of her way than in the choice of public officials. 2 In fact, the part played by the queen in ecclesiastical matters is i Reid, p. 148; Coxe, II. 106. 2 Reid, p. 131. "The influence of Queen Sarah over Queen Anne . . . was in political more than in religious matters; the Queen's friends did not, to any great extent, influence her in the distribution of church patronage." J. Stoughton, 'Religion in Eng., p. 5. "Church patronage was the thing above all others on which the queen exercised her own judgment. ' ' Roscoe, Harley, p. 82. In this respect she resembled Queen Victoria. Cross, Eist. of Eng. and Greater Brit., p. 1037. Hearne believed that the duchess greatly influenced church appointments. Collections, I. 104, 133. 160 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES in one sense the key to her political policy ; and nowhere else does her influence appear in clearer light, or the in- teraction of religion and politics become more apparent. William III, unfamiliar with the administration of the Established Church, and fearful lest his ignorance might produce difficulties, had appointed a commission to fill ' ' all preferments vested in the crown, ' ' and to supervise in a general way all things ecclesiastical. Anne had scarcely ascended the throne before she decided to take into her own hands the presentations to benefices, and " herself dispose of all ecclesiastical preferments belong- ing to the Crown as they became vacant, and not leave it to the Archbishop of Canterbury and five other bishops as the late king did. ' n To some extent, Anne 's decision may have been due to her dislike of Dr. Tenison, Arch- bishop of Canterbury, whom Mary had selected; since Anne had passed him by and invited the Archbishop of York to deliver her coronation sermon. However, the dismissal of the ecclesiastical commission just as clearly denoted her desire to exercise a more direct influence over the church, which she cherished so much, and to keep ambitious Whigs out of important benefices. Among the higher clergy were some of Anne's closest friends. The energetic Bishop of London was her pro- tector on that lonely, stormy night when she sacrificed her father for the sake of her religion. Such favors Anne never forgot, and as a privy councillor, Compton was frequently consulted about church policies, and it was believed that the failure to renew the ecclesiastical com- mission was chiefly due to his advice. 2 Yet, in spite of iLuttrell, V. 157. See also Von Noorden, I. 295. 2 Life of Henry Compton, Bishop of London, pp. 65-9. Harley also sug- gested that the bishops, "who are great patrons themselves, should not solicit her majesty, who has so few livings left," and urged that a merit system should be adopted to provide for the impecunious graduates in divinity at Oxford and Cambridge. THE DISRUPTION OF THE MINISTRY 161 his many good traits, this bishop was not sufficiently monastic in his demeanor to act as her father confessor, even though he were the dean of her own private chapel. That important role was reserved for Dr. Sharp, the cautious Archbishop of York, 1 who exerted a larger in- fluence on affairs ecclesiastical than his professed superior, Dr. Tenison. Early in the reign, Anne had offered Dr. Sharp the position of chief almoner 2 and a seat in the Privy Council, both of which he refused. Subsequently, however, he accepted these evidences of her generosity and good will, even under the implied condition, imposed by the queen, that a part of his duties should consist in making the bishops in the House of Lords "vote right." 3 This valuable function he seems to have performed at various critical moments in the first half of the reign, but reluctantly and only at Anne's express solicitation. In determining ecclesiastical policies, his advice was more often sought than in filling vacancies in the church, although even here he assumed an important and praise- worthy part. Sir William Dawes, the newly appointed Bishop of Chester, was his close friend, and Sharp planned successfully to have the baronet succeed him as Archbishop of York. The queen unquestionably chose to rely upon the discretion of Dr. Sharp, as she knew that in executing her instruction, he, while working for the best interests of the church, constantly took into ac- count the political situation. Occasionally he actively championed the claims of some exceptionally efficient theologian, as Trimnel, who had been Anne's chaplain since 1701. Concerning this enthusiastic divine, he i Indeed Anne told Sharp that she intended him to succeed to the deanery, if Compton, who was getting old, should pass away. Sharp, I. 313. 2 He succeeded Lloyd, Bishop of Worcester, who had been deprived for his interference in the elections of his county. Py. Hist., VI. 51. 3 Sharp, I. 299-300. 162 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES noted: "I heartily wish Dr. Trimnel had some good pre- ferment in the Church ; for he well deserves it, and indeed I do not know a better man. If my good character of him to her Majesty can add anything to her Grace's [Lady Marlborough] recommendation, I am not only ready but shall be glad to give it at all times." Trimnel soon be- came Bishop of Norwich. 1 Thus in appointing bishops, Anne listened attentively to Sharp's intelligent opinion, but by no means invariably followed it. Occasionally his suggestions failed to please her, and at other times, the political exigencies made it impossible for her to carry out their joint wishes. Having personal access to the queen, with whose High Church ideas he was in the closest accord, he enjoyed her confidence in political as well as ecclesiastical affairs. Especially was this true at a time when she was at odds with the pretensions of her leading ministers, who sought to enforce their will upon her. Indeed, on occasions, Sharp seems to have been consulted on Anne's intended changes in the ministry, because he, like Harley, his col- league in the council, strongly advised her against taking into the ministry anyone of whom she personally dis- approved. 2 Along with others like Burnet, he was most influential in supporting her desire to apply Queen Anne's bounty to the relief of distressed 3 curates. He saw personally such important members of the lower i Sharp, I. 333-6. See also Annals (1708), p. 373; Coxe, II. 103. Trim- nel 's pretensions were also supported by Nottingham, and by Sunderland, whose tutor he had been. For an excellent summary of his life, see Hearne, I. 218. Other evidences of his general activity may be found in Morrison, V. 39; S. P. Dom., Anne, IV. passim; ib., II. 44, 85. 2 Sharp, I. 251, 319; Other Side, p. 153; Winchelsea and Nottingham MSS. (H. M. C), p. 22. 3 The word ' ' distressed ' ' is used advisedly, for nearly a fifth of the clergy received £10 or less a year, a fourth more received £20 or less. Fewer than one in every six received £50 or more. Edinburgh Eeview, XXXVIII. 151. See also W. Palin, History of the Church of England. THE DISRUPTION OF THE MINISTRY 163 house as Onslow, Harcourt, William Bromley, and St. John. In the Lords, he spoke twice in its favor and car- ried all the bishops with him for the measure, which passed by only seven votes. 1 It is most natural that Anne confided in Sharp, and made him "her confessor," 2 for not even by a violent stretch of the imagination, could any of her leading min- isters be considered pious. Godolphin's chief interest in life lay in cock-fighting and horse-racing, neither of which could be expected to appeal to the sensitive mind of the queen. The Marlboroughs were also decidedly mundane in their views of life, and Harley's influence in church affairs must have been limited by the queen's knowledge that he had been bred a Dissenter, while his private views of spiritual matters remained strictly Low Church. 3 Of all her ministers, Nottingham was the most devout, and as a representative of the Laudian school, expected to exert a preponderant influence in church appointments. Although the queen relied more than has previously been supposed upon Dr. Sharp's advice, his own testi- mony runs that she used him as her agent, rather than as her master. 4 Lady Marlborough's recommendations were even less final. "As to Mr. Hodely, who you are desired to recommend to me," wrote Anne to her, "the i Sharp, I. 339-41. See also Coke MSS., III. 30; S. P. Dom., Anne, XXV. passim; For 11. MSS., IV. 126. 2 Sharp, I. 301. See also Other Side, pp. 153-7. The duchess said he was Anne's "chief counsellor in church-matters." Conduct, p. 124. 3 Anne's decided preference for the clergy of the Laudian type does not mean that she was intolerant, but only that she treated High Churchmen with the greater kindness. The Quakers never experienced better usage than during her reign, and the Dissenters, as a whole, were disturbed very little after the failure of the Occasional Conformity Bill, in the third year of her rule, until its final passage in 1711. William Sewel, Hist, of the Quakers, II. 595-613; Life of Calamy, passim. 4 ' ' Yet this regard was had to him, notwithstanding that the Queen would rarely give her promise without his advice, and, generally speaking, consent first obtained." Sharp, I. 334-5. 164 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES Archbishop of York did amongst others, name him as one he thought might be proper to succeed Dr. Beveridge, but said, too, that he was young and might stay for prefer- ment better than others, and the last time I saw him . . . he told me that by all the inquiries he had made he believed Dr. Waugh would be the fittest man for this living of Dr. Beveridge, and upon his saying so, I told him he should have it. ' " On account of Anne 's religious views, the Highfliers, at the beginning of the reign, expected to fill all vacant preferments with zealous High Church ecclesiastics, but they were grievously disappointed, as Anne kept a watch- ful eye over preferments, and it must have been a source of annoyance to them that Sharp was so liberal minded in his recommendations as to consider the character and training of candidates as well as their dogma and political inclinations. On a few occasions, the queen unexpectedly requested others to fill vacant benefices. The Bishop of St. David's had been convicted of simony and the see had been with- out a bishop for months. In the interim, Anne was deluged with applications, from which there emerged four leading candidates for the place. Realizing that to select one of these worthies would mean the loss of the support of the other three, Anne confessed her inability to choose among four such excellent men and turned the thankless task over to Dr. Tenison. 2 i Marlb. MSS., p. 27. Benjamin Hoadly was one of the more active Low Church divines. As a pamphleteer, he was most industrious, but his reli- gious views did not appeal to the queen. He was under the Hanoverians successively appointed to four sees. Sharp, I. 312, 335; Morrison, V. 39; Burnet, V. 17; Nottingham Papers, Add. MSS., 29588, passim; Winchelsea and Nottingham MSS. (H. M. C), p. 22. 2 Chamberlen, p. 188. S. P. Dom., Anne, XXIV., consists of a parchment box filled with petitions from the clergy and others about church affairs. She might have desired to embarrass the archbishop who appointed the learned Dr. Bull. S. P. Dom., Entry Book, CL. 243-4. Hearne gives an THE DISRUPTION OF THE MINISTRY 165 Whatever her purpose in this instance, Anne was usually willing to accept all the responsibility for ap- pointments, as she always felt that the church was in danger when appointments were controlled by Whigs. "As to my saying the Church was in some danger in the late reign," she wrote the Duchess of Marlborough, "I cannot alter my opinion, for though there was no violent thing done, everybody that will speak impartially must own, that everything was leaning towards the Whigs, and whenever that is, 1 shall think the Church beginning to be in danger." 1 With such deep-seated prejudices, Anne usually had the last word in disposing of vacant benefices. Indeed she was very jealous of her power in ecclesiastical affairs, and took great delight in rewarding her friends. Dr. Hooper was one of William's chaplains, and when ordered to omit the usual courtesies to the princess, he refused to do so, and thus earned Anne's gratitude. A few years later, she wished him to be appointed her son's tutor, but the king substituted Burnet. As soon as pos- sible after her accession, she rewarded Hooper's loyalty by appointing him Bishop of Asaph, a poor benefice, it is true, nevertheless an earnest of her gratitude, since he was allowed to hold the deanery of Canterbury in com- mendam. Scarcely five months passed before he was, with Harley's help, translated to Bath and Wells, the income of which was three times as great as that of St. Asaph's. Anne's favorite chaplain also became Dean of Canterbury. 2 interesting explanation. ' ' The Low Church men to obviate the reflections made upon them for preferring none but their own party, at length pro- moted Dr. Bull and Beveridge to two bishoprics; but they were Welsh and such as their creatures would not accept of." I. 229. Burnet praises the queen for this action. Add. MSS. (Bodl.), B. 23, ff. 89-93. i Conduct, p. 158. 2 Luttrell, V. 304, 377-8; B. N. B., article on "Hooper"; J. L. Anderdon, Life of Thomas Ken (1st ed.), p. 442. It was reported that Hooper was 166 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES Not long after this, Cowper was appointed lord keeper, an office which heretofore had the right of filling a con- siderable number of benefices. Anne at once told him that she would reserve this right, because as she wrote to the duchess : " I think the Crown can never have too many livings at its disposal and ... it is a power I can never think it is reasonable to part with ; and I hope those who come after me will be of the same mind." 1 Tenison was much disturbed over the queen's control of such appointments and interviewed the lord keeper about it. He received small consolation from Cowper, who had promised Anne "to present as she directed in all the valuable ones," so the archbishop went away fearing the worst from the importunities "of the women and the hangers-on at court," 2 although both men agreed to co- operate in an endeavor to regain control of advowsons. The duchess had also been much exercised at Anne's steady assumption of power over appointments, and maintained that Cowper might safely be permitted to fill vacant benefices. When Anne disagreed with her, the duchess complained of outside influences, an accusation which Anne took very much to heart. "You wrong me very much in thinking I am influenced by some you men- tion in disposing of Church preferments," she said in reply. "Ask those you will believe, though you won't me, and they can tell you I never disposed of any without advising with them, and that I have preferred more to be Bishop of Rochester. Luttrell, V. 251. For Harley's activity in his behalf, see Portl. MSS., IV. 63, 72. Nicholson was appointed Bishop of Carlisle even earlier. Cal. S. P. Dom. (1702-3), p. 358. Wake received his appointment to Lincoln a little later. S. P. Dom., Entry Book, CL. 249. i Coxe Papers, XLV. 1. In 1707, Anne ordered the authorities to ascer- tain whether she did not possess the right of granting the ' ' Besiden- tiary's place" at St. Paul's. S. P. Dom., Anne, IX. 64. 2 Strickland, XII. 129. Cowper acknowledges Anne's monopoly of ap- pointments in his Diary, 21 March, 1706. See J. C. Campbell, Lives of the Lord Chancellors (1874), V. 171. THE DISRUPTION OF THE MINISTRY 167 people upon other recommendations than I have his that you fancy to have so much power with me. ' n Important as they seem to have been, it would be a great mistake to conclude that Compton and Sharp were Anne's only confidants among ecclesiastics. At her accession, Atterbury became a royal chaplain. Though he remained at Oxford for some years, his influence at court increased, and during the last four years of the reign, he exerted great power, 2 despite his offensive aggressiveness in favor of the Jacobites. Personally repellent to the queen was the versatile Burnet, partly because he was a Low Churchman suspected of Presby- terianism, but mainly because he insisted on lecturing her. Yet he, too, even after making liberal allowances for the egotism shown in his works, influenced her coun- cils in a considerable degree. 3 Other ecclesiastics doubtless made themselves felt from time to time, but the four just mentioned were certainly the most important political factors in the Church of England. Since ecclesiastical offices were looked upon as suitable rewards for political partisans, the ministry played an important role in distributing these prizes to their faithful adherents. From the outset of the reign, the treasurer, Godolphin, took an active part in granting i Coxe Papers, XLV. 2. See also Thomson, II. 75. 2S. P. Dom., Entry Book, CV. 93-7; H. C. Beeching, Life of Atterbury, p. 138. 3 Burnet, V. 105, and passim. In August, 1705, Burnet was told that Anne would not favor his nominee for a deanery, as she did not have the same idea of his politics as the bishop did. Add. MSS. (Bodl.), A. 191, f. 27. Wilson is certainly in error when he calls the Whig bishops ' ' the con- science soothers" of the queen. Import, of 'Reign, p. 67. The aged Bishop Lloyd once told Anne he could prove from Daniel and the Revelation that she ought to make a peace. She replied: "My Lord, I am no divine. I cannot argue the matter; but Lord Oxford may perhaps answer your objec- tions." Seward, Anecdotes, V. 87. From which it may be judged that Anne was not exceedingly superstitious after all. 168 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES such preferments as lay in the gift of the crown. As long as Anne and Godolphin were relying upon the High Tories for support, all went well, although the chief minister soon felt his limitations in dealing with delicate ecclesiastical and political situations, and depended in- creasingly upon Harley. Having seen the part played by the queen and promi- nent churchmen in ecclesiastical appointments, we turn now to the activity of Harley, whose interest and import- ance in filling vacant benefices is indicative of the close relation of religion and politics, showing as it does the great interest which the higher ecclesiastics took in politics. A fortnight after he accepted the seals as secretary, Harley was asked by Godolphin whether his friend, Atter- bury, would care for the deanery of Carlisle. A month later, Atterbury was made dean, 1 and despite the strenu- ous opposition of Bishop Nicholson, held his place until translated to the see of Rochester. This quarrel between Atterbury and Dr. Nicholson is significant as showing the influence of politics upon religion. The bishop refused to instal Atterbury because of his supposedly heretical opinions. The climax of the quarrel is described by the latter: "Dr. Atterbury writ to Secretary Harley, and the bishop to Secretary Hedges. Both our letters were laid before the Queen and her Majesty ordered Secretary Hedges to let the Bishop of Carlisle know that the person her Majesty had presented [Atterbury] should be in- stalled." 2 Whether Harley influenced Anne's order is iBath MSS., I. 57; S. P. Com., Entry Book, CLI. 121. Through Har- ley 's influence, Atterbury was granted a license to be absent from his preferment. lb., CLI. 126-7. These entries are taken from Harley 's "Ecclesiastical Book," which he kept while secretary of state. 2 Beeching, Life of Atterbury, p. 138. For the details of Atterbury 's quarrel with Nicholson, see Bath MSS., I. 63; Portl. MSS., IV. 131. At Anne's suggestion, Hedges wrote the bishop, asking him not to take action THE DISRUPTION OF THE MINISTRY 169 unknown, but we may safely assume that Lady Marl- borough at least did not forward the candidacy of such an inveterate Tory as Atterbury. A close friend of both Harley and Atterbury among the higher clergy was Trelawny, Bishop of Exeter, a man of great force, but exceedingly irascible. He was a species of political "boss" in Cornwall, 1 and placed the fullest confidence in the secretary as his intercessor with Anne, whom he had supported in her quarrels with William and Mary. Nor did this trust appear misplaced. Tre- lawny had, in his tactless way, engaged in a dispute with the Bishop of Bath and Wells and applied to Harley for help. "I . . . thank you for the firmness and despatch which you have been pleased to use in rescuing me," wrote the grateful bishop, "I am obliged to her Majesty for ridding me of my forward coadjutor, and to . . . the Lord Treasurer for the part ... he took with you in making known to Her Majesty that indignity." 2 Tre- lawny was soon in the midst of another quarrel with Dr. Hooper, who, when translated to Bath and Wells, had received Anne's permission to hold in commendam the chantry of Exeter, with the understanding that its reve- nue (£200) was to go to the support of that worthy non- juror, Thomas Ken. As Bishop of Exeter, Trelawny objected in emphatic terms, and appealed once more to his friend at court. In taking up the cudgels in his be- half, Harley wrote to Goclolphin that if Trelawny "be obliged in this, it will be a double advantage ; it will please against Atterbury. Add. MSS., 15946, f. 3. It was effort wasted, for the case came to trial and Nicholson won. Despite the chagrin of Sharp and Harley, Anne held that she was satisfied. Manchester, Court and Society, Letter of Feb. 20, 1708. i See his correspondence with Harley in Portl. MSS., IV. 416, 421, and passim; Winchelsea and Nottingham MSS. (H. M. C), p. 21. 2 Portl. MSS., IV. 101, 105. He was also on good terms with Marl- borough. Bath MSS., III. 193. 170 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES a man of interest, and mortify another who has made her Majesty very ill returns for her Majesty's great and dis- tinguished favors." 1 Probably Trelawny's claim was just ; besides Hooper had not proved very submissive to discipline. At any rate, the latter called on the queen, who asked him to give up his claim at Exeter and prom- ised Ken £200 a year from the exchequer. Not only in this matter, where Trelawny's favorite became Dean of Exeter, but in many others as well, Harley's wishes were respected by Anne and Godolphin. 2 The relative influence of the Marlboroughs, Godolphin, and Harley over ecclesiastical appointments was soon to be evident, even to the slow moving lord treasurer. Early in November, 1706, Winchester, one of the most lucrative sees in England, became vacant. For this bishopric, Godolphin 's brother and Trelawny were the leading can- didates. Of the two, Dr. Godolphin possessed much the more satisfactory qualifications. 3 Nevertheless, the lord treasurer was compelled, partly by the queen, and partly by political necessity, to favor Trelawny, and his brother was solaced by the deanery of St. Paul's. Only a few weeks later the new Bishop of Winchester was invested ' 'Prelate of the most noble order of the Garter." 4 Apparently Harley's friends and candidates fared better than those of the duke. Marlborough's chaplain, Dr. Hare, was one of his favorites and when the deanery i Godolphin Papers, Add. MSS., 28055, ff. 94-5; Anderdon, Life of Ken, p. 463. 2 Hearne, I. 23. Harley was also interested in the dispute between Bishops Compton and Hooper the same year. S. P. Dom., Entry Book, CV. 93-7. Further evidence of Harley's influence may be found in Godol- phin Papers, Add. MSS., 28070, f . 6 ; Forth MSS., IV. 50, 57, 274, 473, 478. 3 By common report, Trelawny was an ' ' illiterate, mean, silly, trifling, and impertinent fellow." Hearne, I. 315. See also ib., II. 94. * Burnet, V. 337; S. P. Dom., Entry Book, CLI. 44. Anne had been im- pressed by a sermon he delivered just after the opening of her first parlia- ment. Stepney Papers, Add. MSS., 7074, f. 177. THE DISRUPTION OF THE MINISTRY 171 *at Rochester became void, he wished Hare to have it, so that by this step, he might the more surely obtain the see of Oxford upon which his heart was set. Godolphin interviewed Tenison, who thought the place must go to a Cambridge man. Even the lord treasurer felt that Hare should not be a dean without the degree of doctor of divinity, and the place eventually was given to another. 1 Trelawny's promotion to Winchester created a furor, particularly among the Whigs, and thoroughly disgusted the Highfliers. To propitiate the former, Godolphin rashly promised them the preferments that were then vacant. When he interviewed Anne relative to the un- filled bishoprics of Chester and Exeter, he was greatly surprised to learn that she had already given her word to two Tory divines. 2 It is difficult to account for his astonishment over information that seems to have been public property for a week, 3 on any ground other than negligence of public affairs. Nevertheless, the informa- tion shocked him. When the Whigs heard this last bit of news, they were aroused, and called a meeting of the most influential commoners, where the dukes of Somerset and Devonshire promised them on Anne's behalf that, although she could not recall these obnoxious appoint- ments, she was nevertheless very much aware of the ser- vices the Whigs had rendered, and would in the future fully satisfy them. 4 In compliance with this promise, i Stepney Papers, Add. MSS., 7074, f. 204. Hare received the degree in 1708, but his bishopric did not come until 1727. 2 Portl. MSS., II. 201 ; Burnet, V. 337. s May 31, 1707, Luttrell, VI. 177-8. Yet Trelawny was not formally appointed until June 14. Salmon's Chronology, I. 349. This may have been one of Luttrell 's frequent errors. * Burnet, V. 340. The conges of the bishops of Exeter and Chester are dated Feb. 7, 1708. S. P. Dom., Entry Books, CLI. 153-4; Add. MSS., 4743, f. 80. The presence of these two Tory bishops in the Lords im- periled Whig as well as ministerial control of that house. Leadam, p. 125. 172 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES she made Trimnel Bishop of Norwich, translated Moore to the vacant see at Ely, and appointed Kennett, the his- torian and divine, Dean of Peterborough, and Dr. Potter Regius Professor of Divinity at Oxford. 1 All these men were thoroughgoing Whigs, but even Hearne, the zealous non-juring antiquary, conceded that they were good preachers. This was poor consolation for the junto, for it indicated that Anne held the key to ecclesiastical appointments. Unsatisfactory as the queen's explanation may have been to the Whigs, it was still more unpalatable to Godol- phin. He was thoroughly alarmed because he was forced to acknowledge to himself that he was no longer first in Anne's confidence. Failing to have his way, the lord treasurer turned his attention toward discovering who had usurped his place in the queen's confidence. To find the interloper, it was unnecessary to look beyond the min- istry itself. An investigation revealed the fact that both Godolphin and the duchess had been superseded in Anne's affections by Harley and his cousin, Abigail Hill, who acted as his efficient aid. All might have gone well with these intriguers and their machinations might have remained long undiscovered, had not Lady Marlborough found out, purely by accident, that Abigail, who was also the duchess's cousin, had been secretly married to Samuel Masham in the presence of the queen. What increased Godolphin 's fear was the rumor that Harley, St. John, and Harcourt were attempting, although without success, to gain over such Tory leaders as Hanmer and Bromley, by insinuating that the queen was tired of Whig tyranny Before the queen made her promise, there were rumors, such as "Dr. Free- man is to be Bishop of Chester, a worse could not be thought of." Dart- mouth MSS. (H. M. C.), p. 294. lAdd. MSS., 4743, f. 80; Annals (1708), p. 372; Hearne, II. 18, 88; S. P. Dom., Entry Books, CLI. 144, 153. Potter was Marlborough's protege, and he was very insistent upon his appointment. Coxe, II. 101. THE DISRUPTION OF THE MINISTRY 173 and wanted to be delivered from it. 1 Godolphin 's letters to Marlborough display the deepest distress, but neither he nor the duke could change Anne's decision. 2 The secrecy of Anne and Abigail also aroused the re- sentment and suspicion of Lady Marlborough, who presently began to realize that some one had supplanted her in the queen 's affections. Immediately she suspected Abigail, and wrote the duke of her fears, but he sug- gested that her imagination had gained the better of her judgment, and recommended a plain confidential talk with the poor relation. The interview which followed was stormy and gave little satisfaction to the duchess. When appealed to, Anne sullenly supported Abigail, and Lady Marlborough was forced to impart her suspicions to Godolphin, who was at last thoroughly convinced of Harley's double-dealing, and wrote to Marlborough of the dangerous crisis in their affairs. In reply, the duke sent several letters to his wife and Godolphin, fully ex- pecting them to be shown to the queen. Some of them contain by implication the threat that if Anne did not place her affairs unreservedly in the hands of Godolphin, both the general and lord treasurer would resign. One may have been addressed directly to the queen, who with- out a moment's hesitation took up the challenge. Anne's lengthy message to Marlborough shows some- thing of her real character. In answer to the complaint about ecclesiastical appointments, she insisted that she had not broken faith with Godolphin and Marlborough, for she could not see how the selection of two such worthy men for bishoprics was any breach with the ministry. i Burnet, V. 340; Tindal, IV. 484. 2 Halifax thought she might recall the appointment of Blackall at Exeter. Manchester MSS. (H. M. C), p. 90. Anne's letters of July 18 to the duchess and that of August 25 to the duke show the firm attitude of the queen. Marlb. MSS., p. 41 ; Coxe, II. 99. 174 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES To the charge that these appointments were dictated by Harley, she entered an absolute denial which was con- firmed in toto by the secretary himself, who said that he neither knew these men nor learned of their promotions until it was a matter of common report. 1 Both the queen and Harley may have spoken truly, but appearances are decidedly against them. Anne doubtless told the literal truth, for it is probable that the sugges- tions may have come directly from Mrs. Masham, though at Harley 's instigation, of course. In the case of the secretary, it is hardly possible that he was as much in the dark about the bishoprics as he pretended to be, for his interest and influence in ecclesiastical affairs had already become considerable. Nor was his power dimin- ishing, because towards the close of October, he was the queen 's trusted representative to heal the decided breach between the two houses of convocation. 2 A contempo- rary believed that Harley and his friends were respon- sible for the appointment of the five bishops of Win- chester, Chester, Exeter, Ely, and Norwich, respectively, 3 but satisfactory proof is lacking in the face of the cate- gorical denials of Anne and Harley. One other alter- native has escaped the attention of careful students of the period; namely, that some one else may have acted as the queen's adviser, and there is a possibility that the man was Archbishop Sharp. 4 iMarlb. MSS., p. 41; HardwicTce State Papers, II. 483-4; Burnet, V. 338. Harley 's earlier denials are found in Conduct, pp. 198-9; the later ones in Bath MSS., I. 185. 2Coxe Papers, XXIII. 225; Portl. MSS., IV. 317. s Salmon, Modern History, XXV. 431. The Duke of Newcastle wrote to Harley, 17 September, 1707: "What accident has made the scales fall from the eyes of . . . [Godolphin] for when I came to town he was in love with almost all that society [the junto] if not with every individual person of them. ' ' Portl. MSS., IV. 448. Somewhat later, Mrs. Masham wrote Harley that the "Queen approved your letter to the bishop." lb., 454. * "I was just come to town and went to wait upon the Queen," wrote THE DISRUPTION OF THE MINISTRY 175 Fortunately, it is not a matter of great moment how much the queen, Harley, or Mrs. Masham may have pre- varicated; the important thing to keep in mind is the loss of power over Anne by Godolphin and the Marlboroughs. For the first time since her accession, their power was shaken, and the threat of joint resignation had failed to alarm Anne as they had calculated ; in fact, it had left her more determined than ever to have her way in church appointments. She was also vexed by the ceaseless mur- murings of the Whigs. "Whoever of the Whigs thinks I am to be hectored or frightened into a compliance, tho' I am a woman, is mightily mistaken in me," she wrote Godolphin. ' ' I thank God I have a soul above that, and am too much concerned for my reputation to do anything to forfeit it." 1 Fully as alarming to Godolphin was Harley 's attempted reconciliation with the Highfliers; and more dangerous still was the manifestation of a will- ingness on the part of the important Whigs to ally them- selves with the Tories in order to discredit a ministry which had failed to comply with their wishes. The affair of the two bishoprics, therefore, marks the definite alien- ation of the queen from the Whigs. The junto, of course, had ample reasons for dissatis- faction. They had defeated the "tack," and the "invi- tation, ' ' while they had made the union possible. In spite of all this, they had secured only three seats in the inner councils, and of their own group Sunderland had received a grudging, conditional appointment. Their requests, and later their demands, for more power in the ministry, had been delayed or refused outright. In the meantime, Sharp in his diary, 3 November, 1707. "The Queen says, she will declare the bishops for the vacancies in a little time, and she will have some talk with me about it." Sharp, I. 301. i From Godolphin MSS., quoted by Mahon, 537. Note that Anne falls into the identical expressions that she used when being "hectored" by William and Mary. 176 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES they had been perfecting their organization. The Kit- Kat and Calves Head Clubs were made up of energetic Whigs of the governing class. 1 Considerable attention was also devoted to securing able pamphleteers to present their cause to the masses, 2 while such men as Shrewsbury were beginning to show some consideration for members of the junto. The first real rapprochement between the "Whigs and Highfliers showed itself at the opening of the first par- liament under the union. The subject selected for their joint action was a most dangerous one — an investigation of the Admiralty — as it involved the administration of Anne's husband as lord high admiral, a move which brought forth once more the liveliest antagonism of the queen. One reason for the investigation, probably, was the great scandal that really existed in naval affairs, 3 but the political animus behind it was the unparalleled op- i John Ashton, Social Life, I. 238-42. 2 Nottingham Papers, Add. MSS., 29589, f. 376; Coxe Papers, XIII. 178. 3 A cursory examination of the State Papers, Domestic, for the navy, particularly vol. VI. and S. P. Domestic, Anne, I. 45, 52, 93, and the Ellis Papers, Add. MSS., 28890, f. 193, creates a strong presumption that no able administrator was connected with the Admiralty until Pembroke succeeded Prince George. See also Bouse of Lords MSS. (n. s.), V. 42, 66-100; VI. 8- 35. For instances where the French fleet created havoc with the commerce of the allies, see Luttrell, V. 236, 303, 309; VI. 44, 147, 199, 227; Py. Hist., VI. 619-62. Lord Haversham, who was his own press agent, has left his speech in the Peers on this subject. It is a good example of early eighteenth- century bombast. "Your disasters at sea have been so many, a man scarce knows where to begin, your ships have been taken by your enemies as the Dutch take your herrings by shoals upon your own coasts, nay your Koyal navy itself has not escaped, and these two pregnant misfortunes, are big with innumerable mischiefs. Your merchants are beggared, your commerce is broke, your trade is gone, your staples and manufactures ruined, the Queen has lost her customs, the Parliament must make good the deficiencies, while in the meantime our allies have an open and flourishing trade and our enemies make use of our ships and seamen too against us. ' ' Carte MSS. (Bodl.), CLXXX. 137. The complaints are so numerous that official negli- gence might almost be taken for granted, did we not recall that an English- man 's grumbling is often the best sign matters are "getting on." THE DISRUPTION OF THE MINISTRY 177 portunity it gave for embarrassing the ministry; which- ever way the investigation might terminate, it was in- evitable that there should be some reflection upon the prince, which was certain to cost the ministers a large part of the queen's favor. The immediate occasion of the move was doubtless the unfortunate loss of the most popular English admiral, Sir Cloudesley Shovel, with three valuable ships, and the disastrous attack upon the Lisbon fleet. 1 In supporting the move for investigating the Ad- miralty, the junto hoped to compel Godolphin to be kinder to the Whigs and force Anne to rely more upon them. The motion started off auspiciously, since passionate re- flections upon official negligence were as popular in Eng- land then as two centuries later. Wharton took occasion to call attention to the impoverished condition of England as a result of the ruinous expenditures of war. Somers supported his colleague, but spoke more particularly of the terrible mismanagement of naval affairs. Notwith- standing the efforts of the ministers and the influence of the queen's presence, the customary motion for an ad- dress of thanks to her Majesty was tabled by the joint action of Whigs and Tories, that they might first con- sider the state of the nation. 2 As soon as they began these deliberations, Wharton arose once more to present a petition of two hundred London merchants, praying for relief against privateers. 3 During the war French privateers became most active, and captures were so common that no merchantman i Annals (1707), pp. 240-2. 2 Timberland, II. 180; Burnet, V. 343-7. Kochester, Buckingham, and Lord Guernsey were the leading Tories, who helped carry the motion. Wharton MSS. (Bodl.), IV. 29; Luttrell, VI. 233-6. 3 Py. Hist., VI. 597; L. J., XVIII. 341. Similar criticisms of the Ad- miralty over the Eussian trade were being made in the Commons. Cham- berlen, p. 271; S. P. Dom., Anne, II. 88; Other Side, p. 352; C. J., XV. 464. 178 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES ventured out with impunity except under strict convoy. Moreover, the merchants complained that their vessels for Portugal, Virginia, and Flanders had to wait weeks and often months before the Admiralty would provide a convoy. In 1704, a corn fleet destined for Portugal was kept waiting seven months, and early in 1707, a fleet of fifty-five vessels bound for Ostend was detained five months. Furthermore, even when convoys were pro- vided within a reasonable time, they were usually insuffi- cient or inefficient, if they chanced to encounter a hostile French fleet. Three disasters of particular note had occurred within a year. At the moment when the union was consummated, although the council of the lord high admiral knew that the celebrated French admiral, Four- bin, was cruising off the coast, fifty-six merchantmen were allowed to sail without any information as to his whereabouts, and more than a third of the fleet fell to him as booty. A second fleet soon started for Archangel under the protection of an English squadron, but was attacked by the omnipresent Fourbin with dire conse- quences after the convoy had turned back to the Channel. A third and larger fleet from Portugal was soon after assailed by the same energetic commander and thirty-two merchantmen, together with three men-of-war, fell an easy prey. 1 An attempt to fasten the responsibility for such deplor- able conditions was embarrassing, even to the men who i Burnet, V. 345; Py. Hist., VI. 621-5; Wyon, I. 533; Dartmouth MSS. (H. M. C), p. 294; Coke, III. 168; Manchester, Court and Society, II. 259; S. P. Dom., Anne, I. 52, 93; L. J., XVIII. 364-91, 405-22. In the first year of the war, Burchett reported a serious shortage of convoys. S. P. Dom., Naval, passim, particularly folios 97, 135, 143, 148. Additional statements about privateering and convoys may be found in S. P. Dom., Anne, III. 99, 125; IX. 23, 60, 66. The last citation contains a petition from merchants complaining of the lack of protection against privateers. S. P. Dom., Naval, VII., gives Prince George's answer to their request. THE DISRUPTION OF THE MINISTRY 179 had brought on the investigation, since Whigs as well as Tories knew it would never do to hold the prince account- able for the miscarriages, as Anne would never forgive the party leaders who disgraced her husband. Indeed, it was evident that Prince George was not to blame, as his intelligence was wholly unequal to his task. The man who stood next to him was his favorite, George Churchill, a brother of the Duke of Marlborough, and a "living wonder to mankind how the same parents could have given birth to two sons so utterly dissimilar in charac- ter," 1 for he lacked all the qualifications that made Marl- borough so great. The coalition decided to make Church- ill the scapegoat and in that way revenge themselves upon Marlborough, Godolphin, and the queen. The Whigs soon realized that the investigation was likely to get out of their hands, because, as their objects became attainable, they saw that the Tories were willing to go farther and drive Godolphin from office — the last thing in the world the Whigs then desired, as it would deprive them of their intercessor with the queen. They wished only to make him more complaisant, so they began to draw off from the Tories and finally refused to sanc- tion a motion laying the blame for the mismanagement upon the ministry in general. They would go no further than to beg Anne to make sea affairs her first and most particular care. Indeed, in the face of her opposition there was a sudden change of heart on all sides, until it appeared that if there had been a "design to remove or mortify the admiralty, it had no great support, there being that division among the Whigs which I need not explain, and none of the Tories appearing to encourage any such design." 2 In order to save appearances, Hali- iWyon I. 314. See also James, III. 283-5; Other Side, p. 210. 2 Burnet, V. 343 ; James, III. 287. For the divisions and dissensions among the Whigs, consult the Buccleugh MSS. (H. M. C), II. Pt. ii. 718. 180 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES fax moved that a committee should be appointed to con- sider measures for the "encouragement of trade and privateers in the West Indies." Of course this was an indirect slap at the Admiralty, insinuating that it was in- capable of dealing efficiently with such matters. To the surprise of both parties, and greatly to the chagrin of Churchill and Prince George, Godolphin meekly agreed to second this motion. 1 The Admiralty investigation gained the Whigs nothing, and increased Anne's wrath against the junto. Marl- borough's power seemed sufficient to protect his brother, but the weakness of Godolphin 's position was fully as apparent as it had been in the case of the bishoprics. Although both Godolphin and the Marlboroughs had been intent for three months on displacing Harley, they had made little or no headway against him, when Providence came fortunately to their assistance. In November, 1707, Greg, a disappointed clerk in Har- ley 's office, was found in correspondence with France, 2 and suspicion at once fell upon his superior. Both Marl- borough and Godolphin made as much capital as they could out of the case, and demanded Harley 's dismissal, 3 accusing him also of intriguing against the ministry, of which he was a member. Unfortunately for their peace of mind, the evidence of Harley 's guilt was not sufficient to convince Anne, and as always, she refused to part with a man whom she still considered a faithful servant. Buckingham thought the possibility of a reconciliation of High and Low Churchmen was very good. In its third meeting, the committee upon ad- miralty affairs would admit only that the merchants had proved their losses. James, III. 292. See also ib., III. 360. Vernon asserted, however, that Churchill 's presence of mind alone kept the case about the Eussian mer- chants from coming to a vote. Coxe Papers, XIII. 199-202. i Fy. Hist., VI. 600; Mahon, II. 37-8. 2 S. P. Dom., Anne, IX. 61, contains the incriminating letter or a copy. 3 Mackintosh Papers, Add. MSS., 34515, f. 132. THE DISRUPTION OF THE MINISTRY 181 However, Harley's carelessness, and the unfaithfulness of Greg and two other agents, aroused popular distrust, which perceptibly weakened his political influence, even though all three subordinates steadily insisted that he was entirely innocent of any wrongdoing. Since August, Marlborough and Godolphin had never ceased their efforts to drive Harley from the cabinet council, 1 although apparently co-operating with him in administrative affairs. At last, wearied by their impor- tunities, and alarmed at their joint threat of resignation, Anne gave way, partly because Harley insisted that she accept his resignation, 2 and partly on account of the serious condition of her husband's health, which was so critical as to demand the lion's share of her attention at the same moment that her own strength was rapidly failing. However, it was generally understood that the secre- tary's enforced resignation did not cost him Anne's con- fidence, but rather tended to draw him closer to her, as she now began to look upon him as a persecuted man, who had suffered because he upheld the principles of government that were most dear to her. 3 As a conse- quence, he became her private, unofficial political adviser. Acting in this capacity, unhampered by the duties of a ministerial office, he was free to organize his forces in opposition to the ministry. His dismissal compelled Godolphin to rely entirely upon the Whigs, and from this time forward, the history of his administration is a por- i See the letters of Marlborough, Harley, and the queen in Bath MSS., I. 185; Salomon, p. 14; Morrison, IV. 148. All of them were prior to the discovery of Greg's correspondence. 2 Conduct, p. 213; Portl. MSS., IV. 47; [Defoe], Account of the Conduct of Robert, Earl of Oxford, 25. Prince George probably seconded Harley's suggestion. Coxe, II. 193; Wilson, Defoe, III. 6. 3 Conduct, p. 213. See also Defoe's Secret History of White Staff; Salomon, p. 13. 182 ENGLISH POLITICAL PASTIES tion of the history of the junto, who came more and more to dominate affairs as the weeks went by. 1 More impor- tant still, it marks the end of all serious attempts of Godolpliin, as well as all future ministers, 2 to guide the English government by means of a composite ministry, which endeavored to stand above and between the politi- cal parties of the day. As Godolpliin 's venture was an attempt of this kind, it deserves more careful study than it has hitherto received, for it was really a determined effort to direct the destinies of the United Kingdom in accordance with the will of the queen and her leading ministers, whose dependence upon parliament and the people was scarcely more marked than it had been under Charles II or William III. The celebrated Whig junto, although moved by selfish aims, was nevertheless fighting the battle for responsible government, when its members demanded that Anne put from her a man, who, though personally most acceptable to her, refused to keep the faith with his fellow ministers. During the year 1707, England passed from the hopes raised by the union to a despair which was accentuated by military reverses, naval miscarriages, and a struggle within the ranks of the ministry itself. In effecting the union, the influence of the queen had at all stages of the negotiations been conspicuous, but particularly so in preventing a quarrel between English and Scots after the Articles of Union had been actually signed. Anne's interest in church matters was most noticeable through- out the reign, but she showed her independence in the summer of 1707 by filling two bishoprics without the knowledge or consent of Godolpliin and the Marl- i Dartmouth stated that Godolphin was under the control of the junto much earlier than 1708. See Burnet, V. 179-82. 2 There are a few fleeting exceptions, of course, such as the Coalition Ministry of Fox and Lord North, and the War Ministry of 1914. THE DISRUPTION OF THE MINISTRY 183 boroughs. Moreover, she steadily persisted in her re- fusal to withdraw her nominations. Faced by an inves- tigation of her husband's record as the head of naval affairs, Anne and her ministers had defeated the efforts of a disappointed Whig and Tory coalition, at a time when her ecclesiastical appointments had accentuated the rift in the ministry and directed the attack of the junto, Godolphin, and the Marlboroughs against Harley, who was suspected of being the queen's secret adviser. In the contest, the queen was forced to give way, although even here, she kept by her side Mrs. Masham to act as a go-between with Harley. CHAPTER V THE POLITICAL INFLUENCE OF THE MARL- BOROUGHS AND GODOLPHIN (1702-1708) In England, of all lands, the royal favorite has ever been an object of suspicion. From the time of Piers Gaveston and the Despensers to Buckingham and Laud — yes, even to the time of Bentinck and Lord North, they have led a most precarious existence. The old saying, "Uneasy rests the head that wears a crown," might very well be restated for England: "More uneasy still rests the head that wears the favor of the crown. ' ' 1 Probably no reign in English history better illustrates this than that of the last of the Stuarts, who had many favorites. Starting with Sarah Jennings, she attached herself for a season to Sidney, Earl of Godolphin, then to Harley, and finally to Abigail Hill and the Duchess of Somerset ; and of these five, three were in disgrace when her eventful reign came to its exciting close. Of the companions of her own sex, Lady Marlborough is best known, and her influence at the beginning of the reign was unquestionably large. Her political power is usually considered the motive force in the government during the first half of the reign. It is, therefore, advis- able to study her relations with the queen prior to 1709, to discover, if possible, the comparative importance of each in public affairs. We shall first notice the state- ments of a few typical secondary authorities as to the i See a political letter of Defoe to Harley in E. H. B., XXII. 132. THE MARLBOROUGHS AND GODOLPHIN 185 queen's subservience, and then examine the sources themselves. Such writers as Wyon, Sismondi, Smollett, Cunning- ham, Lecky, Macaulay, and his grand-nephew, Trevelyan, state 1 emphatically that the queen was greatly under the influence of the duchess, but not one gives any satisfac- tory evidence for his conclusions. So it is fairer to take the statement of a writer who does cite contemporary evidence to support his assertion. In his account of Anne's reign, Leadam is very critical of the queen's ability and says that Spanheim, the Prussian ambassador, had a poor opinion of her authority and intelligence. 2 As Spanheim is not quoted, or any reference given, we are left in the dark as to his exact opinion. But granting full force to Leadam 's interpretation of Spanheim 's esti- mate, 3 two things must be considered. First, that Anne usually intrusted foreign affairs entirely to her ministers, for, realizing her limitations in diplomacy, she left all negotiations to her advisers ; and, secondly, that she had an unconquerable aversion to the Hanoverians and all things German, and a sufficient impression of her dislike may have reached Spanheim to make him a prejudiced observer. Fortunately, Leadam goes further, and refers to an observation which the duchess made to Lord Cowper. 4 i Wyon, II. 531; Sismondi, Hist, des Frangais, XXVI. 328; T. Smollett, Hist, of Eng., I. 415, 451 ; Cunningham, Hist, of Gr. Brit., I. 258 ; Lecky, I. 33 ; Macaulay, p. 901 ; G. M. Trevelyan, Eng. under the Stuarts, p. 480. Other typical statements relative to the queen may be found in Belloc, Lingard's Hist, of Eng., XI. 81; Eeid, pp. 38-9; Thomas, p. 32; Strickland, XII. 378. The views of the German scholars are the same as the rest. Von Noorden, Bolingoroke, p. 105; W. Michael, Eng. Gesch., I. 227-8. 2 Leadam, p. 222. See also Thomson, II. 518-9. 3 E. Spanheim, Relation de la Cour d'Angleterre. If Leadam has this source in mind, it is doubtful if he is justified in drawing any such con- clusion from it. This document is printed in E. H. B., II. 757-73. * "The Queen has no original thoughts on any subject; is neither good 186 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES Her statement, when examined, is not convincing, as it sounds more like an explanation of the duchess than a criticism of the queen's intelligence or initiative, while it is not borne out by the duchess's autobiography, which may also be termed a biography of the queen. Moreover, Lady Marlborough's reflections were made soon after her disgrace, when she might be expected to feel bitter. Furthermore, it says nothing, unless by implication, about Anne's being in the hands of others. Taking his evidence at its best, Leadam fails to make out a strong case against the queen, but he does not stop at this, as he maintains that her dislikes and prejudices were personal and not political. 1 Granting the truth of this assertion, it says nothing derogatory to Anne's strength of char- acter, as it might be said equally well of one of the great- est of American executives — Andrew Jackson — who was certainly never criticized for lack of will power. Indeed, out of the multitude of writers that have dealt with this period, few dissent from the currently accepted view, and but one or two at all definitely. 2 In most instances, secondary writers accept Macaulay's impressions of the princess, and apply them to the queen without thinking that her character might have developed with years, or under the responsibilities she encountered as ruler. nor bad, but as put into; that she has much love and passion, while pleased for those who please; and can write pretty affected letters; but do nothing else well. ' ' Cowper, Diary, p. 49. Compare this with her ' ' Opinions. ' ' "Queen Anne was religious without affectation; she always meant well; she had no false ambition ; which appeared by her never complaining at King William 's being preferred to the crown before her. ' ' Bernards upon the Conduct, p. 20. See also Atterbury's sermon before the Commons. Stackhouse, Life of Atterbury, p. 32. i For a stronger statement, see Molloy, Queen 's Comrade, I. 52. 2 Burton is very discreet in his estimates. I. 28. Eoscoe (Harley) is less severe. A. L. Cross varies slightly from the old view. Hist, of Eng. and Greater Br., p. 650. W. F. Lord (Hist, of Parties, pp. 118-21) asserts that Anne's influence in political affairs has been much underestimated, but he deals with the latter part of the reign. THE MARLBOKOUGHS AND GODOLPHIN 187 It is now necessary to examine the works of some im- portant contemporary writers dealing with the reign, to learn their impressions of the queen. Abel Boyer was one of the most prolific of them all, but a careful exami- nation of his Annals and his Political State, with their digest, the History of the Reign of Anne, reveals nothing very uncomplimentary to her intelligence or self-asser- tion, although his opportunities for observation were excellent. 1 Several anonymous contemporaries 2 wrote lives of Anne, and in no instance is there reference to such a state of affairs as portrayed by Wyon, Trevelyan, and Yon Noorden. Lecliard, in his Marlborough, is another who fails to assign to her the role of figurehead, and at least intimates the reverse. 3 One of the keenest observers of affairs at court, where he assumed an important place, was Burnet, the dynamic Bishop of Salisbury. His His- i It must be conceded, however, that barring the usual ceremonial form of address, nothing very favorable is said. "The Queen, though good- natured, indulgent, and easily governed by those about her, when used with obsequiousness, complaisance and becoming respect, was yet extremely jealous of her prerogative, irreconcilable to those who once treated her irreverently, and sullenly tenacious of her resolutions." Boyer, p. 471. He conceded earlier that the duchess controlled all "court favors." lb., p. 177. Here, however, he was trying to show that the concentration of so much power in the hands of the Marlboroughs had aroused the fears of the Whigs and Tories. 2 Queen Anne, Her Life and Beign (1738) ; The History of the Life and Reign of Queen Anne (1722) ; An Impartial History of the Life and Beign of Her Late Excellent Majesty (1738); The Life of Queen Anne (1742). There are no political reasons for Boyer 's silence on such points in his his- tory, published eight years after Anne's death, but under the cover of anonymity, the writers referred to above certainly were not deterred by personal reasons from telling the truth. Contemporary pamphleteers cer- tainly made the most of Anne's intemperance. 3 II. 450. One pamphleteer is plentiful in her praise. ' ' She is pos- sessed of a greatness of soul, not easily alarmed or disordered, as are gen- erally others of her sex, but sedately considering affairs, and weighing their various events. Her resolution cannot be shaken by vain rumors or at- tempts of her enemies." W. Cockburn, An Essay upon the Propitious and 188 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES tory of My Own Time deserves careful attention, but it only says that the duchess was looked upon by violent Tories "as the person who had reconciled the Whigs to the Queen, from whom she was naturally averse. ' n This is not given as his personal opinion, but rather as a rumor suggestive of the spirit of the High Church Tories in 1704. Moreover, Anne was not then in sympathy with the Whigs, although she felt under obligations to them for saving her from the insolence of the Tories. Indeed, Lady Marlborough's attempts to reconcile her to the Whigs were in the main unsuccessful. Chamberlen's estimate of the duchess's influence is never put in such terms as would justify the conclusions of Leadam ; Harri- son remains silent as to the queen's vassalage; Coke fails to record such extreme dependence; Gibson's opinions are of the same nature, while Swift's testimony as a whole is in favor of the queen's independence. 2 Indeed, no contemporary goes so far as do the later students of the reign. One of the most extreme is Thomas Birch, who, in his Biographical Anecdotes, wrote, "As both parties in their turns were greatly disobliged and offended, I cannot recollect any praises which have been bestowed upon her for personal steadiness and wisdom." This statement loses much of its force when we remember that Dr. Birch was a rabid Dissenter, holding Anne re- sponsible for the propaganda in favor of the Occasional Conformity Bill, which he called persecution. 3 Glorious 'Reign (1710), pp. 52-3. Defoe in the Dyet of Poland refers to Anne as the ' ' Great Augustus. ' ' i Burnet, V. 230. See also H. C. Foxcroft, Supplement to Burnet, pp. 153, 247. 2 Chamberlen, pp. 27, sq.; C. Harrison, An Impartial History of the Life and Eeign (1744); Coke, III. passim,', [Gibson], Memoirs of Queen Anne (1729). See Swift's Journal to Stella, Four Last Years of the Queen's Ministry, and Conduct of the Allies. Bonet's view is given in Von Noorden, I. 189. s Birch MSS., Add. MSS., 4221, f. 24. See also Other Side, p. 11. THE MAKLBOROUGHS AND GODOLPHIN 189 While this non-conformist accused Anne of intolerance, Hearne, the zealous non-juror, insisted that she was too favorable to the Dissenters and Low Churchmen, because he thought she was under the domination of the duchess, whom he detested. Still more pointed is a memorandum in the Carte MSS. : "No sovereign was ever more gov- erned by her favourites than she was, but like other weak princes, she strove to conceal it from the public." 1 Un- fortunately, we know neither the writer nor the date of this fragment, so it lacks a great deal of being good his- torical evidence. It might well have been jotted down by Carte, himself a non-juror, months, perhaps years after the reign had closed, as the impressions given by some one else; since this was his habit in preparing materials for writing his history. In some respects, the most cutting criticism of Anne comes from Cardinal Gualterio, who wrote to one of his friends: "We have to deal with a Princess, weak in body and mind, with a hus- band less capable than herself . . . and in the hands of a faction." 2 The cardinal's statements are open to question, however, as he wished to encourage the Jacob- ites both in England and France to attempt a restoration of the old Stuart line. Voltaire was not a contemporary, and gained his ideas from the satellites of the Hanove- rian Court, but even he goes little farther than to say that Anne was a "woman of but very middling talents." 3 It is interesting to note that before the reign had really begun, the Earl of Chesterfield expressed the hope that if Queen Anne "would have no favourites, but choose a i Carte MSS. (Bodl.), CXXV. 100. These seem to be some notes upon Swift's Change of Ministry. John Ker of Kersland, a Jacobite, spoke of her "mean capacity." Memoirs of Ker of Kersland, II. 115. 2 Gualterio Papers, Add. MSS., 20242, ff. 128-9. Lord Haversham, who hated the duchess, spoke of her asa" she favourite, ' ' in his speech of Feb. 15, 1707. s Age of Louis XIV, II. 226. 190 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES wise council and rely upon a Parliament, she might have so glorious a reign as to eclipse that of Queen Elizabeth ; but the event of all things depends on fate, or rather providence." 1 This fragment is not conclusive, since it says nothing about what actually did occur. Fortunately, in solving this perplexing problem, the testimony of Lady Marlborough is available in full, com- plete form, corroborated by numerous letters. The Conduct was written long after Anne had disgraced the duchess, so it would not be unduly favorable to the queen. Though subject, of course, to the vagaries of the human memory, time had nevertheless softened down much of the rancor felt by the duchess in 1712, when her caustic "Opinions" were penned. This autobiography, there- fore, contains a good statement of the relations existing between queen and favorites. An easy method of testing the influence of Lady Marl- borough is to ascertain the part she played in appoint- ments. After conceding, as a matter of general report, that she was practical dictator in state affairs, the duchess said that the choice of Anne's first ministry "was against my wishes and inclinations," and she strenu- ously objected to the queen's "throwing herself almost entirely into the hands of the Tories." 2 She speaks re- peatedly of the difficulties she encountered in attempting to bring Whigs into the ministry. "I resolved therefore, from the very beginning of the Queen's reign," she said, "to try whether I could not by degrees, make impression on her mind more favourable to the Whigs ; and though my instances with her had not at first any considerable 1 Coke MSS., III. 1. A letter to Robert Walpole on this topic is found in the Coxe Papers, XV. 2-3. 2 Conduct, p. 122. Cf. Cooke, II. 577. L 'Hermitage disapproved of all the leading ministers except Godolphin and Marlborough, Rijks Archief, 26A 5 May, 1702. THE MARLBOROUGHS AND GODOLPHIN 191 effect, I believe, I may venture to say, it was, in some measure owing to them, that her ministry, did, against her inclinations, contain several of this party. ' n It must, then, have been an arduous task to convince Anne that the Whigs were suitable agents for carrying out her wishes, as she felt that all Whigs must be at heart repub- licans, whose main purpose was to limit the prerogative of the crown, and endanger the privileges of the church. 2 She well knew the humiliations to which they had sub- jected William, and she wished to avoid a similar expe- rience. Moreover, the Whig leaders had been conspicu- ously against Anne during her quarrels with Queen Mary, and she was never able to endure some of them for that reason, if for no other. 3 Anne's struggle with the king and queen had brought her very close to the Marlboroughs. After the deaths of Talmash and William, Marlborough remained the only efficient general in England. Thus to add weight to the factor of friendship, was the crying demand for a capable man to wage war against France, which Anne could meet successfully only by appointing him captain general. In the political arena, the situation was peculiar. Marl- borough was a moderate Tory, so far as he could be said to hold any political affiliations at all. In times past, his wife had been more of a Tory than he, but the marriage of her daughter to Sunderland's heir had brought her conversion to the Whigs as early as 1702. Prince George was probably of the same persuasion as Lady Marl- i Conduct, p. 126. See also Salomon, p. 12. A letter written by Anne to the duchess shows that she was not convinced by Lady Marlborough 's rea- soning. Molloy, Queen's Comrade, I. 297. Mrs. Thomson believed that Anne refused to listen to the duchess's suggestions. Memoirs, I. 324. See also Other Side, p. 157. 2 Marlb. MSS., p. 53 ; Macaulay, Essay on Addison. 3 Remarks upon the . . . Conduct, pp. 41-3; Review of a late Treatise, p. 7. 192 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES borough, whereas Anne was a High Church Tory. Godol- phin, like Marlborough, stood between the duchess and the queen in a political way, while all four of them, save possibly the duchess, wished to be above and between political parties, 1 without being accountable to either of them. Before the new reign was well begun, it was manifest that Mrs. Freeman and her "dear Mrs. Morley" were not entirely of one accord in their political ideas. As soon as the ministry was decided upon, the former began her attempt to convert the queen to the Whigs, and to bring her son-in-law into Anne's good graces, in order to increase the influence of her family in the government. Her own confessions, as well as Anne's letters, show how difficult was the task. Four days after meeting her first parliament, Anne wrote a letter, which explains the political ideas of both women: "I am very glad to find by my dear Mrs. Free- man's, that I am blest with yesterday, that she liked my speech, but I cannot help being extremely concerned, you are so partial to the Whigs, because I would not have [us] . . . differ in opinion in the least thing. What I said when I writ last upon this subject does not proceed from any insinuations of the other party ; but I know the principles of the Church, and I know those of the Whigs, and it is that, and no other reason, which makes me think as I do of the last. And . . . upon my word . . . you are mightily mistaken in your nature of a true Whig. For the character you give them, does not in the least belong to them, but to the Church. But I will say no more on the subject, only beg for my poor sake, that you i Morrison, I. 24. Eijks Archief (26 A ) gives L 'Hermitage 's idea of Marl- borough's position as stated above. Byan thought Anne wished to form a third party, which the duchess's enemies dubbed the "Zarazavians." See, however, Mrs. Manley's Zarah and the Zarazavians. THE MARLBOROUGHS AND GODOLPHIN 193 would not show more countenance to those you seem to have so much inclination for, than to the Church party. ' " Anne was thus convinced neither of the virtues of the Whigs nor of the validity of Sarah's arguments in their favor, and urged her favorite to get in touch with the Tories. "I am firmly persuaded that, notwithstanding, her extraordinary affection for me," wrote the duchess some years later, "and the entire devotion which my Lord Marlborough and my Lord Godolphin had for many years shown for her service, they would not have so great a share of her favor and confidence, if they had not been reckoned in the number of the Tories." 2 There are also some signs of the rift between the friends, which was finally to embitter the lives of both. Whether the begin- ning of their trouble lay in the behavior of Lady Marl- borough at Gloucester's death, as is believed by some, or in the episode of the gloves, which is exploited by Miss Strickland and distorted by Voltaire, or in some totally different incident, is of little consequence, as striking differences of opinion already existed. However, the queen's real emotions were not then visible to Lady Marlborough, for Anne was an artist in dissembling her feelings. This has not usually been understood, despite the testimony of Dean Swift that 11 there was not, perhaps in all England, a person who understood more artificially [how] to disguise her pas- sions." 3 So, perfectly oblivious of the fact that her power was gradually slipping away, the duchess per- severed in trying to convert her royal mistress to the policies of the Whigs. After a time, she realized that i Conduct, p. 128. See also Swift's Sentiments of a Church of England Man; Marlb. MSS., p. 53. 2 Conduct, pp. 124-5; Burton, I. 57. 3 Swift, Queen's Last Ministry ; Swift's Works (Scott ed.), III. 325. See also Berry, Social Life of France and England, I. 225 ; Torrens, Hist, of Cabinets, pp. 46-7 ; Von Noorden, I. 202 ; Priv. Cor., II. 458. 194 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES her ministrations were ineffective but she could not understand why, and continued her attempts to turn Anne away from the Tories, who unwittingly were playing into Lady Marlborough's hands through their insistence upon the Occasional Conformity Bill. Even then, the queen refused assent to her favorite's views of the Tories. "I have the same opinion of Whig and Tory I ever had," she wrote, "I know both their principles very well, and when I know myself to be in the right, nothing can alter mine. It is very certain there are good and ill people of both sorts, and I can see all the faults of one as well as of the other, and I am not deluded by anyone's calling themselves of the Church, for God knows there are too many that talk of religion that have no true sense of it, but because there are some hot headed men among those that are called Tories, I can't for my life think it reasonable to brand all of them with the name of Jacobite, when without doubt there are many of them that will be as much for the liberty of their religion and country as any who would have none thought so but themselves." 1 The queen was now willing to listen to criticisms of the Tories, but insisted that the party should not be con- demned for the deeds of the few. Not only Anne's resent- ment over the "tack" but also her attitude towards the union threw her into opposition to the Tories. She sus- pected some of them but she was not thoroughly convinced of their double-dealing until they sought to embarrass her by the "invitation." "She had been present at the de- bates in the . . . Lords upon the subject, and had heard . . . Buckingham treat her with great disrespect," records the duchess. "Such rude treatment from the Tories, and the zeal and success of the Whigs in opposing the motion so extremely disagreeable to her, occasioned her change of mind." Lady Marlborough herself thus i Marlb. MSS., p. 51. See also Conduct, p. 137; Salomon, p. 12. THE MARLBOROUGHS AND GODOLPHIN 195 confessed that Anne changed her attitude towards the Tories, not because of her friends' arguments, but solely!/ on account of the Tories' insulting behavior. Personal I feelings, then, not political philosophy, governed tlie / queen's decision to abandon the Highfliers. Anne soon authorized "Godolphin to give the utmost assurances to the chief men of the Whigs, that she would place herself and her affairs into such hands as they should approve." 1 Yet this promise was not kept imme- diately. She dismissed the obnoxious leaders one by one, and not until after the election of 1705 did she deem it advisable to allow the Whigs important seats in the council. Meanwhile the duchess began to fear lest Anne should become too independent in her political policies and show too much favor to the Tories. 2 Even Cowper, a moderate Whig, was accepted only after considerable delay and consideration. For a season the most earnest entreaties of Lady Marlborough availed nothing, al- though Anne finally did agree to take the great seal away from Wright and appoint Cowper, whose political ideas she disliked. The queen's letter to Godolphin well illus- trates the methods and influence of Godolphin and the Marlboroughs over her appointments. "Your telling me yesterday that when you weare at London, you would consider to whom it would be proper to give the Great £>eale, is the occasion of my giveing you this trouble at this time, for I think it is all ways best to tell one's thoughts freely before one takes a final resolution of this nature, and therefore I cannot help saying I wish very much that there may be a moderate Tory found for this employment, for I must own to you I dread the falling into the hands of either party, and the Whigs have had so many fayvours shewed them of late that I fear a very i Conduct, pp. 159-60. 2 See the duke's letter to his wife, August, 1705, Colville, p. 149. 196 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES few more will putt me insensibly into their power, which I 'me sure you would not have happen no more then I." Apparently the queen had talked the case over with the duchess and found that she favored the Whigs. At any rate, Anne continued : ' ; I know my dear unkind Mrs. Freeman has so good an opinion of all that party that to be sure she will use all her endeavours to get you to pre- vaile with me to put one of them into this great post, and I cannot help being apprehensive that not only she but others may be desirous to have one of the heads of them in possession of the Seale, but I hope in God you will never think that reasonable for that would be an unex- pressible uneasyness and mortification to me ; there is no body I can rely on but yourself to bring me out of all my difficulties, and I do put an intire confidence in you, not doubting but you will do all you can to keep me out of the power of the mercyless men of both partys, and to the end make choice of one for Lord Keeper that will be the likelyest to prevent that danger." 1 In such words Anne clearly indicated that she took an intelligent and important part in deciding who should hold offices under the crown. It points also to the fact that she knew her favorite's ideas on the subject but had no desire to follow them, and warned the lord treasurer against being unduly influenced by her arguments. Most important of all, it expresses her great desire to govern without the aid of any party. In spite of this letter, Cowper was appointed, and from that it would seem that the duchess's candidate did prevail, for Cowper was not the favored applicant of Godolphin or the queen, but this conclusion does not necessarily follow, as Harley was also enthusiastically supporting Cowper. 2 i Godolphin -Osborne Papers, Add. MSS., 28070, f. 12. 2 Bath MSS., I. 64; Burnet, V. 225. Godolphin is said to have told Dartmouth that Cowper was not to his liking. No ministerial appointment THE MARLBOROUGHS AND GODOLPHIN 197 Shortly after this appointment, the queen decided to grant the Whigs more representation in her councils. "I believe, dear Mrs. Freeman," she wrote, "we shall not disagree as we have formerly done. I am sensible of the service those people have done me of whom you have a good opinion, and will countenance them. And I am thus thoroughly convinced of the malice and insolence of others you have always been speaking against." 1 Anne intended not only to show favor to the Whigs, but also to flatter the duchess into believing that it was her influence that had caused this change of mind, which in truth was due to the ingratitude of the Tories. The queen's friendly attitude to the Whigs did not last long, and she soon began to manifest signs of discontent at the arrogance of the junto when they tried to force Sunder- land into the ministry. The struggle of the junto to gain entrance to the queen's inner councils is thus very important in deter- mining the part played by the duchess in filling important places, since the secretary of state was one of the most influential officers in the cabinet. Upon Nottingham's resignation, Hedges was for a few weeks sole secretary. When Harley succeeded Nottingham, he remained as of this half of the reign aroused so much comment as that of Cowper. Hearne (I. 60) has several reflections on his appointment, among them a poem of advice to the queen, one stanza of which runs: ' ' One Cooper to your Uncle was untrue, Another, Anna, may be so to you; Can he thy honour and thy conscience keep Unspotted, when his own is fast asleep? Let Cullon witness this, whose wretched Ghosts Proclaims this — She who trusts to him is lost. ' ' See also ib., I. 53, 56, 178; Wharton MSS. (Bodl.), IV. 27-8. Rawlinson MSS. (Bodl.), D. 89 B , also touches on this appointment. i Conduct, p. 159. See also Wyon, I. 385. It is possible that as late as May 30, 1705, Anne kept up negotiations with Rochester and Nottingham. Portl. MSS., IV. 190; Conduct, pp. 154-5. 198 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES Harley's colleague in the secretariat. Hedges was a Tory of moderate principles, but was particularly ob- noxious to the duchess, who thought that since his ap- pointment had been originally secured by Rochester, 1 the earl still retained his dominion over him. So, although his administration of affairs was relatively efficient, Lady Marlborough wished his place for Sunderland. In selecting ministers Anne's motives were fundamen- tally personal. After a time her objections of a political nature might be overcome, as in the case of Cowper, but when her personal aversion was joined to political dis- approval, the difficulty of gaining her consent was im- measurably greater. Anne disliked Sunderland. He was rash, outspoken, prided himself on his republicanism, and had dared to vote against Prince George's pension. Moreover, he was a Whig, and worse still, a leading member of the group that directed that party. Finally, he belonged to the powerful Marlborough family, and his appointment would add still more to its influence, and noticeably increase the envy with which that self-seeking family was regarded, not only by politicians, but by the masses. 2 As Marlborough's son-in-law, and the favorite of the duchess, the junto sought to use him to gain a foothold in the council, and served notice upon Godolphin that Sunderland must immediately be admitted to the min- istry. 3 All of the treasurer's energies were now directed towards that end. Notwithstanding Anne's earlier assur- ances, he had session after session with her, but with little result. When she was at last shown that she must choose between putting herself again into the hands of i Conduct, p. 168. 2Macaulay, p. 2724; Birch Papers, Add. MSS., 4223, f. 302. 3 Conduct, pp. 164-7. Some of the Whigs probably distrusted Sunder- land. See Bemarks upon the . . . Conduct, p. 48. THE MARLBOROUGHS AND GODOLPHIN 199 the fanatical Highfliers, or give Sunderland a place, she temporized. Both Marlborough and Godolphin felt her displeasure, as is shown in the duke's letter to his wife: "And hence the resolution is taken to vex and ruin 91 [Godolphin] because 83 [Anne] has not complied with what was desired for 117 [Sunderland], I shall hence- forward despise all mankind, and I think there is no such thing as virtue, for I know with what zeal 91 has pressed 83 in the matter. I do pity him, and shall always love him as long as I live ; and never be a friend to any that can be his enemy. I have writ my mind freely to 83 on this occasion, so that whatever happens, I shall have a quiet mind." 1 Anne remained obdurate, but intimated in a letter that she would give Sunderland a place when one became vacant; to this the Whigs were much averse, because it served to delay their plans. To Anne's letter, Godolphin replied by an even longer one, but she stood firm for some time, and then promised to admit Sunderland to the council without a portfolio, 2 and grant him a pension. Although she had already sent him as her special repre- sentative to Vienna, 3 these promises were unsatisfactory and failed to mollify him or his fellows, and it looked as though the junto would, by their repeated threats, compel Godolphin to resign. In all this Harley seems to have taken an important although quiet part, and after the lord treasurer was worn out by the demands of the Whig leaders, it fell to him to attempt to propitiate them. 4 His success seems to have been at most but temporary, as the i Conduct, p. 164. This message shows clearly that early in the reign Godolphin began to lose his power over Anne. 2Coxe Papers, XLI. 23; Morrison, I. 24, 50 (2d Series). This last long letter reads very much like the scheme of a shrewd politician. 3 Birch Papers, Add. MSS., 4223, f . 302 ; Luttrell, V. 560, 566. 4 Bath MSS., I. 74. 200 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES junto, particularly Sunderland and Wharton, were im- patient to enjoy places in the ministry. To the efforts of Godolphin and Harley, Marlborough at first gave a tardy and reluctant acquiescence, and then actively championed Sunderland's cause, after he had been given some assurance that the young nobleman would exercise more prudence for the future than he had ever exhibited in the past. 1 The duke's letters were as fruitless as had been the efforts of Godolphin. 2 Anne's first excuse was that she had no sufficient reason to dis- miss Hedges, whose work had always been to her liking, but she did not hesitate to say that she had political and personal objections to Sunderland. "I must own freely to you," she replied to Godolphin, "that I am of the opinion making a party man secretary of state when there are so many of their friends in employment of all kinds already, is throwing myself into the hands of a party which is a thing I have been desirous to avoid & what I have heard both the Duke of Marlborough and you say I must never do." 3 Towards the close she voiced a most natural fear that she would be unable to get along with the impetuous earl. Anne's reply was unanswerable, as both Marlborough and Godolphin realized. However, they had to do some- thing, since the junto refused to aid them in the next session unless Sunderland was given both a portfolio and a seat in the council. As a result, Godolphin, after beg- i " I did in a former letter beg her Majesty 's favor for Lord Sunder- land, and I should be obliged to you in making it easy, as well as putting the Queen in mind of bringing him into her service. I am well assured of his zeal and that he will behave as he ought to do. ' ' Marlborough to Godolphin, Coxe Papers, XIX. 206. Coxe thought that Marlborough was intermediary between Anne and Harley, as well as between Anne and the Whigs. Coxe, ch. 51. See also Strickland, XII. 137; Thomas, pp. 246-8. 2 Coxe Papers, XVIII. 106-7; ib., XX. 85. 3 Morrison, I. 24. This letter exhibits Anne 's political sagacity. It is frank, pointed, and attacks all the weak points in Godolphin 's demands. THE MARLBOROUGHS AND GODOLPHIN 201 ging Marlborough to hasten back to England, did his best to answer the queen. ' ' That this will throw you into the hands of a party, I beg your Majesty's leave to be a little larger upon this head," he wrote, "because I take it to be the main point, and because I am also very clearly of opinion that this is the surest if not the only way to keep you from falling into the hands of a party, which you seem so much to dread." 1 His arguments were futile, and the struggle went on. In their despair, the junto once more called Harley into consultation. Sunderland, in particular, could en- dure no more, and he angrily called attention to these conferences with Harley and Godolphin, when the junto resolved that what the latter had promised "must be done, or they and 202 [Godolphin] must have nothing more to do together about business, and we must let all our friends know just how the matter stands between us and 202, whatever is the consequence of it. " 2 Still results did not come, as Anne seemed in no hurry to admit Sun- derland to the ministry. Marlborough returned home after his victory at Ramillies, and tactfully added his appeals to those of his wife and Godolphin. At last, Anne was borne down with constant importunities which were probably seconded in secret as well as in public by Harley, who concluded that the future held more for him with the Whigs in control than if the Tory zealots came back into power. The queen realized, as well, that only a united ministry could bring about the union with Scot- i Morrison (2d Series), I. 51. See also Coxe Papers, XX. 92. 2 Coxe Papers, XLI. 55-6. This letter sheds light upon the temperament of Sunderland, who had relied upon the influence of the duchess. lb., 13. Earlier than this the duchess had made such a threat to Anne. ' ' When they [the Whigs] are forced to leave your service you will then indeed find yourself in the hand of a violent party who I am sure will have very little mercy or even humanity for you. ' ' Conduct, p. 1 64. Harley 's part in the affair rests upon the proper deciphering of this letter. 202 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES land, and she capitulated, but only upon the express con- dition that Sunderland should resign, if his actions failed to please her. Without such a proviso to save her pride, she would probably never have yielded. 1 After more than a year's siege, the junto won their victory over Anne, who had sought to stand above all factions. Nevertheless, their assiduity would probably have failed even with Sunderland's promises of good behavior, had it not been for Marlborough's great per- sonal influence after Ramillies, and the need of the junto's aid in carrying the union. Even then there was little graciousness in her surrender, as the tender heart of Godolphin bears witness. "You chide me," he wrote the duchess, "for being touched with the condition in which I saw the Queen. You would have been so, too, if you had seen the same sight as I did; but what troubles me most in the affair is, that one can't find any way of mak- ing . . . [her] sensible of 83 's [her] mistake, for I am sure she thinks 83 entirely in the right." 2 He was quite correct, Anne never forgot nor forgave this humiliation. In addition to displaying the slender hold Godolphin had on power, this contest indicates that Marlborough was not secure either in his position with the queen or in his relations with the junto. No one, save Marl- borough and Harley, was more aware of how reluctantly Anne allied herself with the Whigs than was St. John. ' ' I should be glad, ' ' he wrote, ' ' to know what temper you found the gentlemen in, whether they will think it reason- i Marlb. MSS., p. 42; Stepney Papers, Add. MSS., 7075, f. 71, 7058, f. 78; Bath MSS., I. 132; S. P. Dom., Anne, VIII. 101, 120A; Hanover Papers, Stowe MSS., 222, f. 481. Some attribute to Mrs. Burnet considerable re- sponsibility for Sunderland's appointment. Clarke and Foxcroft, Burnet, p. 431. Notwithstanding Anne's assurances to Godolphin, "It was not until after much solicitation that her Majesty could be prevailed upon so far to oblige the Whigs. ' ' The duchess in Conduct, p. 160. 2?to. Cor., I. 66. THE MARLBOROUGHS AND GODOLPHIN 203 able to support the Queen who has nothing to ask but what we are undone if we do not grant ; and who, if she does make use of hands they do not like, has been forced to it by the indiscretion of our friends. The real founda- tion of difference between the two parties is removed, and she seems to throw herself on the gentlemen of England, who had much better have her at the head of 'em than any ringleaders of fashion. Unless gentlemen can show that her administration puts the Church or State in danger, they must own the contest to be about persons ; and if it be so can any honest man hesitate which side to take." 1 The absence of all reference to the duchess is signifi- cant, and coupled with the other letters just examined, would tend to make one suspect that the latter 's influence upon general political affairs even up to 1706 was less vital than has been supposed. Throughout the reign, the queen never lost her spirit of favoritism toward the Tories, even when they ceased to support her. As a matter of fact, Anne 's tardy acquiescence in carrying out the wishes of the Marlboroughs widened the gulf between herself and Mrs. Freeman. Some writers, who emphasize the political importance of the favorite, insist that she practically dictated the selection of court officials. In the case of the first minis- try, we have found this untrue, according to her own con- fession, as well as that of others, 2 while political necessity was perhaps as largely responsible for the appointment of Cowper and Sunderland as was the influence of the duchess. The latter is also charged with being respon- sible for the appointment of practically all officials of the royal household. To this, she enters an emphatic denial, i Coke MSS., III. 63. 2 Smollett, Hist, of Eng., I. 415, 451 ; Boyer, p. 177; Quart. Rev., LXIV. 253; Macpherson, I. 636, 92; Coxe Papers, XIII. 151; Hanover Papers, Stowe MSS. (B. M.), 222, f. 241. 204 ENGLISH POLITICAL PASTIES saying that except for the pages of the backstairs, the other places in the gift of the mistress of the robes con- sisted of "waiters, cofTerbearers . . . starchers and sempstress." 1 Such certainly were not positions of con- sequence, and she could not build up her political power by such appointments. Unless it can be shown that she controlled more valuable places, it would be incorrect to assign much importance to this phase of her activity. As no claim has been more often made to show that the duchess had Anne completely in her power, it is essential to ascertain what evidence exists to support such a con- tention. Miss Strickland cites several references in the Coxe Papers, but all her examples relate to menials, whom the duchess conceded that she placed in office. We should naturally expect her as groom of the stole to select her lowly subordinates, since others had done so before her, and no doubt her successors continued to do so after her. Nothing except her Jacobite leanings, and her inveter- ate hostility to the duchess could have caused Miss Strickland to sneer at the latter 's part in reforming the custom of selling places at court, as it seems illogical to assume that she had everything to do with the patronage and nothing at all to do with such an important regula- tion concerning it. If her influence in selecting crown servants were half so great as is usually believed, she could readily have convinced Anne that such a reform was unnecessary, or at least undesirable. As a matter i Conduct, p. 310. Miss Strickland (XII. 69) insists that "Sarah reigned supremely over the formation of the newly formed household, dis- posing of all places. . . . From the mighty Dutch magnate, Portland, down to the humble clear starcher, Abrahal, Sarah . . . placed and displaced whomever she thought fit." Miss Strickland says this depends upon a statement of the duchess found in the Coxe Papers, but she fails to give the volume, and an examination of these manuscripts failed to reveal it. Cf. Sismondi, Hist. Frangais, XXVI. 329; Other Side, p. 260. THE MARLBOROUGHS AND GODOLPHIN 205 of fact, the duchess was never guilty of open corruption, even in this mild form, consequently she could have had no personal reasons for opposing reform. Besides, her ideas as to court appointments were anything hut selfish. "If I had power to dispose of places,'' she wrote in con- fidence to Godolphin at the beginning of the reign, "the first rule should be, to have those that were proper for business ; the next, those that had deserved upon occa- sion; and whenever there was room without hurting the public, I think one would, with pleasure, give employ- ments to those who were in so unhappy a condition as to want them." 1 As a matter of fact, the available evidence fails to connect the duchess with the reform at all. Burnet tells us of the issuance of the ordinance 2 through Anne's declaration in the Privy Council. It is improb- able that he would have consciously left out any refer- ence to the part played by the duchess, as he was an inti- mate friend of the Marlboroughs, and his book was ex- amined by the duchess before its publication. 3 If a list of the men and women holding important offices in 1702 be examined, the complaint of the duchess that the new ministry was not to her liking will be found to hold true as well for the second-rate offices about the court. 4 The Duke of Devonshire, Earl of Jersey, Earl of Rochester, Earl of Nottingham, Sir Edward Seymour, and Sir John Gower were not friends of the Marl- boroughs, yet they were appointed to office along with i Quarterly Review, XXIII. 12. See also Coxe Papers, XLVI. 2; Con- duct, p. 301; cf. Thomson, I. 362. 2 Burnet, V. 63. 3 Foxeroft, Supplement to Burnet, XXVII; Ranke, Eng. Hist., VI. 75. Stebbing (Genealog. Hist., p. 768) is silent as to any part the duchess may have taken in this reform, as is Coke (III. 136), who, like the Duke of Buckingham, thought the regulation was inoperative. 4 For these names, see Anglice Notitia (1702); Stepney Papers, Add. MSS., 7074, ff. 117-23, 208-9, f. 88; ib., 7079, f. 88; P. C. Reg., LXXIX. 106. 206 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES Godolphin. Devonshire was a Whig, it is true, but Jersey and Gower were at least zealous Highfliers, if not secret Jacobites. Moreover, such men were much to Anne's liking and she was willing to take their professions of loyalty to the church at their face value, until their actions proved them to be selfish, ambitious, and totally unworthy of favor. Then, however, she was placed in the greatest of quandaries, for she liked the Whigs little more than she did the Tories, who had refused to do her bidding. Whereas the evidence in favor of the duchess's in- fluence seems inconclusive, from various sources we learn that others had much to do in appointing to desirable offices. While secretary, Nottingham was active in pro- moting the interests of his followers. Yet he conceded that there were insurmountable obstacles in his way, the chief of which was the queen, who always interested her- self in political appointments. Closely connected with the disposal of offices at court is the question of rewarding loyal political supporters with peerages, or promotions within the peerage. The duchess was accused of dictating Anne's selection of peers, but in this instance, the case of her accusers breaks down entirely. Her husband was created a duke, not only without her solicitation, but contrary to her best judgment. 1 Indeed, as soon as she heard of the queen's intentions, she wrote posthaste to her spouse, advising him to decline the honor. This suggestion Marlborough acted upon some time later, but the "solicitations of the Queen and the importunities of Godolphin, as well as the representations of the Pensionary Heinsius, at length vanquished the reluctance of the Countess." 2 Godolphin i Marlborough 's letter is printed in Reid, p. 112. See also Conduct, pp. 302-3; Klopp, Der Fall des Hauses Stuart, X. 230-1. sCoxe, I. 102; Reid, p. 112. THE MARLBOROUGHS AND GODOLPHIN 207 interviewed Anne in the duchess's behalf, but Queen Anne was determined to have her way, and the lord treas- urer was advised to prepare the duchess for the inevitable. "I hope you will give me leave, as soon as he comes, to make him a duke," wrote the queen ten days later. "I know my dear Mrs. Freeman does not care for anything of the kind, nor am I satisfied with it, because it does not enough express the value I have for Mr. Freeman, nor anything ever can how passionately I am yours." 1 Such words are rather conclusive on this point, despite the superabundant assertions of friendship. Moreover, the duchess insisted that she never desired, much less asked for her husband that honor, which Anne granted in so special a manner. 2 Although the duchess did not contribute to the duke's promotion, she may have been active in forwarding the cause of others. Buckingham's promotion was certainly due to his zeal for the church and to his early friendship for Anne. Somewhat later, the queen created five peers in a group, four of them Tories of one mind with herself, and John Hervey, a Whig friend of the duchess. While denying all connection with the other creations, the duchess takes the entire credit for securing Hervey 's peerage. She was in the country when she heard that Anne had decided to create four peers. At once she wrote Marlborough and Godolphin that if they did not endeavor to "get Mr. Hervey made a peer, [she] neither would nor could show [her] face any more. . . . The thing was done purely at my request. ' ' 3 i Conduct, p. 304. 2 Morrison (2d Series), II. 39; Stepney Papers, Add. MSS., 7074, ff. 252-3; Eeid, p. 113. 3 Conduct, pp. 297-8. Hervey gives the duchess all the credit. Diary, pp. 1-38. Burnet says he was made a peer "by private favour," but the Parliamentary History (VI. 149) is more explicit. Some might assert that the Marlboroughs influenced all these creations, but if it is remembered that 208 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES If the duchess were such a political force as has been supposed, it is strange that she should have been kept in ignorance of the- queen's intentions until the last moment. Stranger still is it, that instead of writing directly to Anne to grant this personal favor, she should ask her husband and the lord treasurer to use their influence in her behalf. Strangest of all, is the intimation that her pleas might not succeed. This letter creates a strong presumption that her influence was not excessively great in appointments, even when she thought it was; at least it appears so as far as she had to do with the peerage, even when creations were made for political purposes. 1 In two other creations, the Marlboroughs probably took some interest, although there is no certainty that their influence was decisive. Godolphin's peerage was due probably as much to Anne's friendship, as to the wishes of the duchess. In 1703, Lady Mary, daughter of the duchess, was married to Viscount Monthermer, son of the Earl of Montagu, who soon after was honored with a dukedom. The natural inference is that Marlborough and his wife promoted his claim. Yet it must be remem- bered that the former was never on good terms with Montagu or his son, and that there never was any love lost between Lady Monthermer and her imperious mother. Before passing final judgment on Montagu's promotion, it is well to bear in mind that Rutland became a duke at the same time, and believed that his elevation was due to Nottingham; furthermore, Seymour was also very active in political affairs and his son was among those honored. 2 the duchess was becoming more and more favorable towards the Whigs, this view is untenable. Life of the Duchess, p. 42. i The aim of these creations was to change the Whig House of Lords to Tory, whereas Sarah was continually importuning Anne to turn Whig. 2 Nottingham Papers, Add. MSS., 29588, ff. 413, 419; Macpherson, I. 635. THE MARLBOROUGHS AND GODOLPHIN 209 At the beginning of the reign, the duchess's influence was thought by many office seekers to be of value. Ham- ilton solicited her aid in Scottish affairs, in which she might have been of real help, because here she was in close sympathy with Anne. 1 A year later, however, the duchess openly confessed to Sunderland that she was unable to further the interests of a mutual friend, al- though she had spoken to Anne and Godolphin "for him with as much earnestness as if he had been my friend . . . this twenty year." 2 In fact, in such cases, the duchess was so exceedingly troublesome that the ministers, espe- cially Godolphin, were glad when she ceased to meddle in affairs of this kind. 3 Though the duchess's importance- may have been small in creating peers and selecting ministers and minor government officials, it is possible that she may have had more to do in determining the personnel of the bench and returning officers. Cowper noted, however, that Anne displayed a most exasperating interest in choosing Eng- lish and Irish judges, while she took delight in pricking the sheriffs, and writing in the names of those she pre- ferred when the candidates presented failed to meet her approval. 4 Anne had heard that the mayor of Dover ordered bells rung in joy when he learned that Prince George was to lay down his post in the Admiralty. She wrote Godolphin that if this report were true, "I cannot think he is a fit person to succeed Mr. Herbert or anybody i Cal. S. P. Dom. (1702-3), p. 142; Oilier Side, p. 239. 2 Mackintosh Papers, Add. MSS., 34518, f. 64; Newcastle Papers, Add. MSS., 32679, f. 17. s Cunningham, II. 77. * Diary, January 5, 1705; Strickland, XII. 134; S. P. Dom., Sec. Letter Book, CIV. 46; S. P. Dom., Anne, IX. 1. In another instance Anne asked for more information about the candidates before she signed the warrants; at another time she criticized the methods used to secure sheriffs, and wished the lord keeper to impose this extra duty upon the judges on circuit. Ellis Papers, Add. MSS., 28890, f. 377; S. P. Dom., Anne, II. 1. 210 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES else." 1 One would scarcely conclude from this that Anne's appointments were usually made at the sugges- tion of the duchess or anyone else, unless the men were personally acceptable to her. A similar spirit is also indicated concerning the independent attitude of some of the prince's servants. "I will be sure to speak to the Prince to command all his servants to do their duty," she wrote to Lady Marlborough. "If they do not obey him, I am sure they do not deserve to be any longer so, and I shall use my endeavours that they may not; but I hope they will not be such villians; and if they do what they ought, I am certain it will be none of the Prince 's fait. ' ' 2 Anne's reply indicates that the duchess's letter was in the nature of a complaint, rather than a request that the prince's servants be changed, but in common with the other instances cited, it fails to prove that the duchess's word in civil appointments was decisive even in the early years of the reign. Peerages, court places, and pensions do not seem to have been to any considerable extent under the duchess's control. What was her importance with reference to ecclesiastical appointments? The queen was pious, al- most to the point of superstition ; Lady Marlborough was practical minded and accused by her enemies of atheism. So, naturally, there would be little sympathy between them in matters dealing with liturgy and church admin- istration. Anne seized every available opportunity to increase her influence in ecclesiastical affairs, and stead- ily refused to yield any part of her power to Cowper, even at the request of the duchess, whom she quietly snubbed when the latter persisted in advocating Cowper 's i Mahon, p. 538. 2 Coxe Papers, XLV. f. 147. In the summer of 1706, two of the prince's grooms of the bedchamber were dismissed, partly on account of their oppo- sition to the court. Samuel Masham succeeded one of them. Marlb. MSS., p. 53. THE MARLBOROUCxHS AND GODOLPHIN 211 right to certain advowsons. Lady Marlborough had little influence over the higher clergy, save possibly Burnet, who was unpopular with the queen. The duchess's part in bringing about the defeat of the High- fliers was probably direct, but she succeeded in her aims only because Anne was convinced in her own mind that the duchess was right. When the queen was morally cer- tain of her ground, as in the case of the two bishoprics, the combined influence of the Marlboroughs and Godol- phin was insufficient to change her plans. Such a cursory view of the duchess's influence upon domestic affairs does not bear out the contention that Anne was completely dominated by her in such matters. If she was supreme, as was said, why did she permit Rochester, the duke's rival, to be made lord lieutenant of Ireland? Was it magnanimity, or lack of power? Why was it necessary for her to wait more than two years, before her protege, Sunderland, was taken into the cabi- net council? Was this due to her patience or to her weakness? Last of all, why was it possible for Harley to remain in the ministry for months after the duchess, supported by her husband and Godolphin, had demanded that he be disgraced? Was this due to a friendly sym- pathy for Anne, or to her limited political power? What- ever may have been the part played by the duchess in the political arena, the queen's financial affairs were entirely under her control, much to the advantage of both women, for Anne was careless of her money, whereas Sarah was penurious and grasping. As a result, Mrs. Morley was kept upon an allowance, which left her frequently in embarrassing circumstances, and must have helped to increase her discontent with the favorite. 1 In the struggle between the Whigs and Tories to bring over the Electress Sophia, the influence of the duchess i Add. MSS., 32679, f. 17; Loclchart Papers, I. 126-7, 267-8. 212 ENGLISH POLITICAL PARTIES was not predominant, and she confessed her inability to do anything with Anne on this important issue, much as she must have desired to stand well with both the queen and the next heir to the throne. It is still more perplex- ing to understand, even if we boldly assume that she had been responsible for whipping the Whigs into line, why, after rendering such valuable services to a most grateful mistress, she could not easily have gained the queen's consent to her son-in-law's promotion, which she had been urging so long. 1 Not only in the domain of political affairs, then, does the power of the duchess seem to vanish, but in diplo- matic affairs as well. Her part in settling the question of the succession was slight, while her share in the nego- tiations leading up to the union does not seem particu- larly significant. From the year 1703 onwards, her name seems to disappear from the correspondence connected with both Edinburgh and Westminster. Gradually, very gradually, it dawned upon the duchess that her influence was diminishing, and when the news of the secret marriage of Abigail leaked out, much to the discomfiture of both Anne and the waiting woman, her suspicions were aroused and an investigation con- vinced her that Abigail had wormed herself into the queen's confidence — a state of affairs due largely to the negligence of the duchess and the lord treasurer. With Godolphin at the helm of state and her husband leading a victorious army, the duchess thought herself firmly ensconced at court. So confident was she of her power, that she absented herself for long intervals from Anne's side, while superintending the building of Blenheim and quarreling with Vanbrugh, the architect. She even dared lecture Anne continually about her fondness for the Tories who were working so persistently against her. i See the remarks in Life of the Duchess, pp. 30-2, and Conduct, p. 160. THE MARLBOROUGHS AND GODOLPHIN 213 Slowly, all this preaching against the Tories produced a reaction, and the queen began to tire of her favorite, whose continued absences allowed her, solitary and moody, to brood over her wrongs, and led her to seek other secret advisers. The relations existing between the queen and her two favorites are of vital importance in determining the extent, nature, and consequences of the intrigues against the ministry. We have seen, thus far, that Abigail came under Anne 's influence early in the reign. Exactly when Harley's confidential relations with Abigail began, it is difficult to ascertain, but at least by 1707 her power was sufficient to arouse the duchess. She was a distant but needy cousin of Sarah Jennings, 1 to whom her very existence was unknown until late in William's reign. As soon as the impulsive Sarah's attention was directed by Princess Anne to her poor relation, she endeavored to better the latter 's condition, and it was easy to secure for her a place as bedchamber woman in the princess's household. 2 Early in Anne 's reign Abigail was promoted to a place in the queen's bedchamber. Abigail proved herself an efficient servant. "She was a person of a plain, sound understanding, of great truth and sincerity, without the least mixture of falsehood or disguise," wrote Swift, who knew her well. 3 She must have possessed considerable natural ability, as her corre- spondence is clear, and far more intelligible than that i For the exact relationship, consult Notes 4' Queries (2d Series), VIII. 57, 155; ib. (10th Series), VIII. 390-1. 2 Abigail's name appears in the list of Anne's household in 1700. Anglice Notitia (1700), p. 519. She was probably employed as early as 1698. See also Strickland, XI. 276; Bath MSS., I. 189. Another cousin was put to school, in due time became a page to Prince George, and later he was appointed groom of the bedchamber to the Duke of Gloucester. Con- duct, p. 180. s Swift, The Queen's Last Ministry; see also Journal to Stella, passim. 214 ENGLISH POLITICAL PAETIES of the majority of men and women at court. Her tem- perament was placid and unruffled, in violent contrast to the duchess's excitability; she was ever courteous and deferential, whereas her cousin had always been brusque and plain-spoken. On all occasions she seemed "full of love, duty and veneration for the Queen, her mistress," 1 and was always willing to share the confidence of her sovereign and to sympathize with her in all distress. For many months the duchess did her utmost to further the interests of Abigail at court. The latter was grate- ful for such assistance and wrote obsequious notes to her benefactress, who was convinced that she was shy and reserved because ' ' she always avoided entering into free conversation with me, and made excuses when I wanted her to go abroad with me." 2 Indeed, the duchess was so kind to her socially that the queen soon became jealous. "I hope Mrs. Freeman has no thought of going to the opera with Mrs. Hill," she wrote, "and will have a care of engaging herself too much in her company, for if you give way to that, it is a thing that will insensibly grow upon you. Therefore give me leave once more to beg for your own sake, as well as Mrs. Morley's, that you will have as little to do with that enchantress as 'tis possible, and pray pardon me for saying this." 3 Anne penned these lines before political difficulties had sprung up to separate her from the duchess; it was earlier, too, than the dispute over the letter of August, 1706, and the unpleasantness concerning Cowper's con- trol over church benefices, which threw into bold relief the High Church beliefs of the one and the Low Church proclivities of the other; 4 neither had the merits of the i The Queen's Last Ministry; Notes $ Queries (2d Series), VIII. 9. 2 Mackintosh Papers, Add. MSS., 34515, ff. 96 '"^V^ ■ ?, -^ A N k- » ^ C^ -ft q v X- * "^e. " ^=lk aV t/> c ^> \-' 1 ■» u .£==(1 lIfcrS : - "t/' Ok* * -N\ K» A O C- VNdfK/" , Jl • ^x, <■ ^ % ^ w ^ D0BBSBR0S. c *kW*'* ^^^ C *}