Glass, Book ^^?h^S^rW-~~ n ELIJAH WARD rOF NKW YORK.] A BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH BY ROBERT HADFIELD. A NEW EDITION. NEW YORK: G W . C A R L E T O N & CO., PUBLISHERS. LONDON S LOW, SON .1 CO. M.DCCC.LXXVII. 1 <•! A W It h i 1 .1 3 ^!^ ' V M ^ % ELIJAH WARD [OF NEW YORK.] A BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH BY ROBERT HADFIELD. A NEW EDITION. NEW YORK: G. W. CARLETON & CO., PUBLISHERS. LONDON : S. LOW, SON & CO. M.DCCC.LXXVII. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1874, b/ G. W. CARLETON A CO., in the Office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington. J'26|flo 7 John F. Trow & Son, Printers and Bookbinder^ 105-213 Kast \2th St., NEW YORK. TO THE CONSTITUENTS OF THE HON. ELIJAH WARD, M.C., EIGHTH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT, NEW YORK, THIS SKETCH OF HIS PUBLIC SERVICES IS RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED. TO THE READER. rpHE honorable career of Elijah Ward, his earnest support of the Government during the late civil war, and his sound views on leading financial, commercial and other questions, would seem to render a sketch of his public services not inappropriate. His recent re-election to the House of Representatives of the United States, affords a suitable occasion on which to present to his constituents and the public, the accom- panying record of his Congressional career. December, 1874. ELIJAH WAED. I HE name of Ward is of Scandinavian origin, and passed with the Northmen to Normandy. Two of the principal chiefs, " de la Warde," and " Warde," accompanied Wil- liam the Conqueror into England, and were engaged in the Battle of Hastings. The Honorable Andrew Ward, from whom the Wards of West- chester County, in the State of New York are descended, migrated from Sufiblk, in England, to New England, in 1630, in company with a number of families of that county, including that of Mr. (afterwards Governor) Winthrop. He first settled at Watertown, Massachusetts, where, five years afterwards, he, with others, was appointed by the General Court to form a government in Connecti- cut. In the following year, he and his associates held the first court ; and " he made the first law, and tried the first cause in it." He was for several years a judge or magistrate, and, at difierent periods, a deputy or member of both branches of the General Court of that colony. The historian of Connecticut, referring to him and his colleagues, says : " They were the civil and religious fathers of the colony, who assisted in forming its free and happy constitution : were among its legislators, and some of the chief pillars of the church and commonwealth, who, with many others of the same excellent character, employed their abilities and their estates, for the prosperity of the colony." In 1641, differences of opim'on arose on certain questions of ci^^l and rehgious liberty, and the views of Mr. Ward, as to its value, be- ing more consistent than tliose of the constituted authorities of the day, he, with several of his friends, removed to Stamford, and, in 1643, purchased the town of Hempstead, L. I., then a part of the colony of New Amsterdam. The following year they formally landed at Hempstead Harbor, now Eoslyn, L. I., and founded the village of Hempstead ; but, h»ving some difficulty with the Dutch authorities, Mr. Ward returned to Connecticut, was appointed a magistrate, and cl(»sed a long and useful life in 1659. Some of his cliildren removed to Westchester County, and to them the Wards of that region owe their origin. The name is one of the most distinguished in the annals of the county, and many members of the family have held prominent positions in the state and nation. Elijah Ward was born at Sing Sing, Westchester County, and is about fifty-six years of age. He is the son of Israel Ward, now deceased, who married a daughter of the late John Rossel, of the same county. Young Ward was sent to the village academy, where lie received an academic education, and at an early age developed a taste for books and the acquisition of knowledge. He was interested in many subjects ; but, pohtical economy, history, and biography, were his favorites, more especially the latter, wherein youth can trace the progressive steps by which men attain high pubhc, pohtical and social eminence ; and, if ambitious, may learn to follow successful and illustrious examples. His industry and perseverance in self-culture, gave him, in addition to the results of his academic studies, a large fund of general information of much use to iiim in after life. Having an early predilection for the legal profession, he decided upon adopting it. His Idnsman, Major General Aaron Ward, then a representative in congress, and a lead- ing member of the bar in Westchester County, proposed taking liim into his office. The offer was pecuharly favorable, and was warmly appreciated ; but, with the spirit of self-reliance which has been the main spring of liis success, young Ward resolved that, as such a step would make him somewhat dependent, he would rely upon his own efforts, until he should thus be enabled to pursue his intended studies. In the spring of 1833, he went to the city of New York to seek employment. On the day after his arrival, he was engaged by Mr. John S. McKibben, then a prominent and much respected merchant, with whom lie remained up to the time when he was enabled to direct his attention exclusively to his chosen profession. Meanwhile he l^ecame thoroughly conversant with business trans- actions, thus acquiring knowledge wliich was afterwards of great value to him in the practice of the law, and developing the deep interest in mercantile affairs and men, wliich has always been an animating principle of his pubhc life. So long as he was with Mr. McKibben, he devoted his time, after the hours of business, to mental improvement. Under competent instructors he unremit- tingly pursued a course of classical, philosophical and practical studies; thus laying the foundation of much that was useful and characteristic in his future successful career. He kept steadily in mind the profession he had marked out for himself, — and, in 1838, while yet a clerk, attended the Law School in the University oi New York, then numbering among its professors the Honorable WiUiam Kent, the Honorable Benjamin F. Butler, and David Gra- ham. In January, 1839, Mr. Ward was elected President of the "Mer- cantile Library Association," an institution then, as now, contribut- ing much to the advancement of the intellectual character of the merchants of New York, — and of no little utility to the community of the city at large. Even at that time it numbered more than 5,300 members. During the term of his office, it attained a liigher degree of prosperity than in any preceding year of its existence. He was tendered a nomination for re-election, but declined it in conse- quence of the intended change in his occupation. In February, 1840, lie ei tered, as a student, the law oflSce of the Honorable "William W. Campbell. In May, 1843, having completed the prescribed term of legal study, he was admitted to practice in the Supreme Com-t and Com-t of Chancery. Immechately after his admission he became the law partner of Mr. Campbell. In 1848, he was admitted to practice in the Supreme Court of the United States. During the partnership, Mr. Campbell was counsel to the Alms House Commissioners, held the office of Commissioner in Bank- ruptcy, was appointed a Master in Chancery, and was elected to Congress as representative from the city of New York. The prin- cipal part of the business, therefore, necessarily devolved upon Mr. Ward. Through the advantages derived from his former commer- cial pm'suits, an extensive acquaintance among merchants, and a steady and earnest devotion to his profession, together with the high character and eminent abihty of his associate, the firm, in a few years, attained a most lucrative and successml practice ; and, on the elevation of Mr. Campbell to the Bench ^f the Superior Court nf the City of New York, in 1850, Mr. Ward succeeded to the busi- ness. In May, 1845, he received a commission as Judge- Advocate of the Second Brigade, with the rank of major. In May, 1848, he became Judge-Advocate of the First Division, N. Y. S. M., with the rank of colonel ; and, in January, 1853, was appointed by Gov- ernor Horatio Seymour, Judge-Advocate General of the State, with tiic^ rank of brijrad!cr-<2;eneral. Upon his promotion to the position of Division Judge- Advocate, the Second Brigade Staff, on the 4th of July, 1848, presented to him, through General George P. Morris, a beautiful gorget of gold, with appropriate ceremonies, at the quarters of General Sandford, in the presence of the field staff officers of the First Division. When he was advanced to the position of Judge Advocate General, the division staff " being unwilling to close tlieir military relations without testifying, in some suitable manner, their esteem for him as an officer," presented him with a costly and handsome sword, " as evidence of the cordial and friendly regard of those wlio had the best opportunity of witnessing General Ward's devo- tion to the military service of the State." Soon after the incorporation of Texas into the American Union, open hostilities between the United States and Mexico ensued The acqmsition of New Mexico and Cahfornia, by the treaty of peace with Mexico led to the proposal in Congress that " no part of the territory acquired shall be open to the introduction of slavery." No such proviso .was necessary, as slavery there was already prohib- ited by the laws of Mexico, and could not be instituted until the existing laws had been repealed, and special enactments provided for its estabhshment were passed. The proviso was not adopted, but it led to a violent sectional agitation that distracted and divided the country, until the passage of the Act of 1850, known as the com- promise bill. For several years during these dissensions. General Ward con- tinued to devote himself to the practice of the law, and, although always a democrat, kept aloof from the divisions in his party, and deplored their existence ; but when, in 1853, scliism again arose, the prominence of his position rendered it necessary that he should take one side or the other, and he identified himself more fully with the National Democracy, whose principles were most in conson- ance with his own. At this time, his active political career began. Hith&rto he had neither sought, nor desired political advance- ment; but had often refused the sohcitations of his personal friends, to enter upon the arena of pubHc life, believing that the bar itself afforded a sufficiently wide field for distinction, and that the faithful performance of his professional duties admitted of no other conciu*- rent pursuits. Now, the dangers wliich arose from bitter sectional and partizan sentiments and have since culminated in war, began more and more forcibly to command his attention, and soon secured his earnest and active services in behalf of his country. Educated in the revolutionary and national traditions of his family, he deenied the welfare of the whole Union, the proper object of his best efforts as a citizen, and beheved that the federal constitution, loyally and intelligently administered, amply provided alike for secm-ity and progress. The expediency of repeahng the laws which prohibited the admis- sion of new slave States, north of the Missouri hue — thirty-six de- grees and six minutes of north latitude — ^into the Union, was much doubted by many prominent Democrats, among others General Ward ; but as Congress, under the lead of the Honorable Stephen A. Douglas, had, in ISS-i, repealed the prohibition, it was deemed advisable to regard the measure as a fact already deter- mined. In Jane of that year. General Ward, being desirous of enabhng Senator Douglas to give a full expression of h'^ opinions on the state of public affairs, and of uniting the iNational Democracy in the support of Ins views, gave a complimentary enter- tainment to liim, at which a large nmnber of the leaders of that party were present. In addi-essing Senator Douglas, General Ward bore emphatic testimony to the progressive characteristics of the Democratic party, and the fidehty of it, and the people at large, to the Union. He said: " The great success of tbe Democratic party in times past, is attributable to its rigid adherence to a strict construction of the constitution, its national character in regarding all parts of the country as equally entitled to the rights and priv- ileges provided by the constitution, and its s3-mpathy -with, and devotion to, the interests of the people. It is a party of rational and sound progress, and keeps pace -with the advancement of mankind. It believes the people may be safely en- trusted with power; that man is approaching to a state of greater perfectability, and that even ancient laws may be modified to meet the progressive spirit of the ige. '•The people are devoted to the Union of the States, and they are determined that nothing shall destroy the beauty and harmony of the whole. They regard the Government as having been placed here by an all wise Providence, for an example that is gradually to spread its influence until the people, everywhere, are impressed with the great fact, that they should be the true source of power, and that Government is constituted for all, and not for privileged classes. They believe 9 that oiir country lias a great mission to accomplish, and that its great destiny can only be attained through union, that in union is the source of its commercial and political grandeur and power, and that all minor questions sink into insignificance compared with its great future." The Legislature of the State of New York, by an act passed the 17th of June, 1853, authorized the Commander in Chief of the State to confer brevet rank upon the officers of the Il^ew York regiment of volunteers who served in the war with Mexico. The duty of presenting the commission devolved upon General Ward. The ceremony took place on the 29th of July, 1854, at the Astor House, in the presence of Major-General Quitman, the commander of the volimteers, and the first American Governor of Mexico, together v,it\i several other distinguished officers and civihans. After refer- ring in high terms to the bravery of the gallant New York regi- rnent. General Ward availed himself of this opportunity of express- ing his views as to the inexpediency and danger of maintaining a large standing army, and in faVor of the American volunteer system, in the following terms : " Our volunteer service always has been, and is one of the most important and interesting features of our political system, and deserves all possible encourage- ment from our General and State governments. The citizens of this country en- tertain a deep-seated prejudice against a large standing army. The sentiment has arisen from the admonition contained in the history of other nations; it dates from the earliest period in our history as a government, and has grown and been strengthened with its rapid and unparalleled growth. Onr distant position from the powerful nations of the Old World, and the ready and cheerful obedience of our citizens to the laws, render a large permanent army unnecessary. In its place, however, we have all the elements necessar^^ to create at any moment an army adequate to the greatest emergencies of the government. These elements are to be found among the brave, skillful and scientilic officers now in our regular service, manj' of whose names are alread}^ high on the scroll of fame.in the military acade- my, the nursery of the highest order of military science, tactics and knowledge, and in the patriotic devotion of our citizens. The commencement of each war in which our country has been engaged has witnessed a large body of our citizens, of all classes and professions, and of everj^ business, leaving their ordinary avocations for the public service ; and the return of peace has witnessed their retirement to the quiet and peaceful pursuits of private life." In August, 1855, General Ward was a delegate to the State Con- vention of the National Democracy, then held at Syracuse, and was 10 appointed Chairman of the Committee on Eesohitions. The resolu- tions reported by him, and adopted by the convention, were com- prehensive ; embraced the leading principles for which the National Democracy were contending; reflected dignity upon the convention ; and met the approval of his party and conservative men. In October of the same year, he was elected President of the Yomig Men's National Democratic Club, composed of a large num- ber of the influential, active and energetic young men of the party, and which did most effective work in the pohtical campaigns of that period. In 1856, he was a delegate to the Democratic Convention at Cincinnati, which nominated the Honorable James Buchanan, for President, and the Honorable John C. Breckem-idge, for Yice- President. In the great contest which took place in that body, be- tween the rival divisions of the New York Democracy, his efforts in favor of a harmonious and honorable settlement of the differences, with a view to the unity of the party in the coming struggle, did much to produce the satisfactory result that ensued. The same year he was chosen by a large pluraHty, a representa- tive in Congress, from the Yllth Congressional District, composed of the ninth, sixteenth, and twentieth wards of the city of New York, which then, and during the time he represented it, had a repubhcan majority. His competitors were the Honorable George B r i g g s , of the " Native American " party, and General James W. Nye, a Repubhcan. Pursuant to his election, he took his seat as member of the XXX Vth Congress, on the fii-st Monday of December, 1857. Dming liis first term in Congress, no member made a more desira- ble reputation as a legislative statesman ; or, more and warmer friends. No other became so famihar with pubhc men of all parties, and from every part of the United States. His speeches were upon snb- jects of substantial interest, and such important points as were immediately before Congress. All of them were characterized by 11 much condensed and solid information, followed by a terseness and accuracy of reasoning wbich caiTied con\dction to the minds of those who heard him. Strongly impressed with the knowledge that slavery would never permanently exist in the territories, then owned by the United States ; that by the simple laws of cHmate, and of profit and loss, slaveholders, and the institution of slavery, could only remain in re- gions more congenial to it ; Gen. Ward earnestly bent his best efforts toward securing a peaceful solution of the question, on which so embittered a controversy had arisen. Nothing but the silent opera- tion of natm-al causes, for so long a period of time, was needed to insm'e the triumph of freedom without injury to either race, or the people of either part of the Union. He saw the dangers inseparable from pressing the decision to an immediate issue by congressional enactments, and behoved the dictate of sound poHcy was that legisla- tion, the cause of such constant sectional agitation, and fraught with so serious consequences to the pe^ce and harmony of the Union should, so far as possible, be left to the people of the territories, and of the new states to be formed out of them. He lamented the sectional and pohtical excitement, engendered by the angry debates aiid frequent misrepresentations of parties not always disinterested on a subject in itself so simple and easy of settlement, and saw that the bond of fraternal intercourse and sentiments, which should always exist between the residents in the different parts of our common country, was akeady weakened. He believed the Demo- cratic party to be the only one that properly appreciated and guarded all the great pm'poses for which om' government was founded, that while it sought to protect individuals in the full enjoy- ment of their personal privileges, and to preserve and extend civil and rehgious hberty, it maintained a sti'ict observance of constitu- tional rights and obhgations, and wisely fostered the great com- mercial, agricultural and mechanical interests of the nation. Holding these views, he addressed the House of Representatives on 12 the 31st of March, 1858, on the " Nationahty of the Democratic party and its importance to the Union." He m-ged the necessity of investing the people of Kansas with the power of exercising the • functions of a State government, so that Congress might be reheved from further interference, and the people be left "perfectly free to form and complete then* domestic institutions in their own. way, subject only to the Constitution of the United States." The citizens of Kansas, had an opportunity of voting for delegates to form the constitution; but many of them refused to exercise that right, or be bound by the reciprocal obhgation of the trust reposed in them. The character of the Constitution was as democratic as that of other States. One of the provisions was, that the people should " at all times, have an inahenable and indefeasible right to alter, reform, or abohsh then- form of government in such manner as they may tlunlv proper." Opposition to such a Constitution, seemed to him an omen of evil. He called on the Anti-Leeompton Democrats to pause in the step they were about to take, warning them — how wisely subsequent events demonstrated — that the sec- tional triumph they were striving to accomphsh, might bring in its train, such calamities as could only be conjectured. He said : " The public welfare, the repose of the nation, and, indeed, every consideration that can influence the patriot and lover of his country, demand that this subject should be promptly dismissed from the halls of Congress. Kansas admitted, the people of the territory will then adjust their own internal affau-s, peace be restored, a more natural and healthful flow ot immigration than that sent forward by the emigrant aid societies will occur, and peaceful pursuits will be cultivated, instead of the warlike amusements now threatened. If Kansas should not be admitted, the excitement now pervadmg the country will be continued ; the subject will again be presented to Congress, impeding all legislation during the next session, and perhaps m the one following it ; the waves of anger and embittered feeling rolling higher and higlicr. It does not require a prophetic spirit to foretell the dis- astrous consequences that may ensue." Confident that slavery in the territories, left to the operation of natm-al causes, would soon perish, General Ward hoped that by pursuing the calm and magnanimous course which is so often the best policy in great afiahs, the people in all parts of om* coimtry 13 might avoid tlie calamities of the war, through which they have since passed. He said : " Once firmly established and acted upon in good faith, slavery will be left to the law of climate and soil to control it. This law, which has been silently work- ing since the adoption of the constitution, has caused the abolition of slavery in six ot the original states, and either abolished or prohibited it in nine of the new states since admitted, and which has now brought to us two, if not more, free states for admission into the Union, thereby destroying the equilibrium between the slave and free states, imposes, in my judgment, a higher duty upon the national democracy of the north than has hitherto existed, to see that the compromises of the Constitution are maintained, and the rights of the states secured. Its action in the past is a guarantee for the future." In conclusion. General Ward used the following words : " I love my whole country : it is with regret that I see contrasts presented, at- tempting to show the greater prosperity of one section or class over another. We are one aggregated w^hole — what adds to one part strengthens the other. Our power and greatness as a nation result from combination, and from that alone must it increase and be carried on in the fulfillment of its great future." When he became a member of the House of Kepresentatives, the historical case of Judge Watrous, of the United States District Court in Texas, had engaged its attention during several sessions. The questions involved in it were those of the independence and in- tegrity of the judiciary, and due regard to the sacred right of petition. The State of Texas, through its legislatmes, had made ample examination into the charges against Judge Watrous, and, being fully convinced that he had been corruptly interested in the results of various suits in his court, asked a just investigation from Congress, and that, if the guilt of the accused were established, he should be removed from the high office, of which he had abused the trusts. He was charged with having endeavored, for his personal profit, to give validity, through the coiu-t in which he presided, to certificates of title covering nearly twenty-four millions of acres of land, and with being directly or indirectly interested in the chief suits brought before him. On the 4th of December, 1858, General Ward addressed the House, presenting a full, efiective -and impartial statement of the acts of Judge Watrous, and strenuously urged the necessity of main- 14 taining honesty and purity in the national courts, and of holding corrupt judges to due responsibility. He insisted that the right of petition should be maintained, and that the exercise of this essential institution of repubhcanism should be treated with proper consider- ation by those who are elected to represent the rights and interests of the people. The sources whence the charges emanated were such that a fan- investigation into then- character was due, not only to tho dignity and purity of judicial position, and to the people at large, but also to the accused, who, if innocent, should be allowed an op- portunity of vindication and acquittal. " Until that is done," said General Ward, " his usefulness as a judge is gone, his honor tar- nished, and his integrity impeached." The importance, to this comitry and the world, of a ship canal to coimect the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, has for many years en- gaged the attention of General Ward, and, on the 15th of February, 1859, he dehvered an elaborate speech upon it, in the House of Eepresentatives. After referring, with great warmth, to the inter- est, he, personally, and as the representative of a constituency, to which the progress of commerce was of vital importance, felt in in- creased facihties for the transfer of property, and the intercourse of mankind by means of raih-oad and canal communications, he ex- plained the magnificent project of a ship canal across the Isthmus, between the two great American continents, at such a cost as would yield a reasonable profit. Having shown that the chief nations of the world had, from the earliest liistorical period, desu-ed to participate in the trade of the East, and that the country controUing it had for that time held a commercial supremacy over all others, he specified the advantages the United States would gain in the contest for this great and in- creasing trade, by cutting a canal from ocean to ocean, and thus placing our country in a central position between the commercial nations of Europe and those of the Orient. Entering into a minute calculation, he demonstrated that, accord- 15 ing to the official statistics of the United States for 1857, the savins to our trade for that year would, if the canal had been completed, have been $35,995,930, and that the annual saving to the world during the next ten years would be $99,060,416, with a certainty of continual additions. The estimated cost of the canal was $73,687,- 141, by way of the Atrato and Truando Eivers. He showed, by valuable tables, the great economy that c6uld be effected in every voyage from New York to various important ports by the proposed work, in comparison with the present routes. San Francisco alone would then be nearer to the commercial metropohs by fourteen thousand miles, tlian by way of Cape Horn ; and on every outward voyage, an average saving of at least ten thousand miles would be made to China, India, Japan, the Sandwich Islands, British Aus- tralia, the Dutch, Enghsh and French East Indies, New Zealand, Alaska, the Russian possessions on the Pacific, the western coast of Mexico, Chile and Peru. Including the return trip, the saving would be doubled. The attainment of such great results would give an extraordinary impulse to the commerce of the United States and other nations. Important and remunerative as the work would be, he thought it was of a magnitude too vast to be assumed without the aid of the government. He, therefore, proposed that, if necessary. Congress should guarantee the payment of interest on the capital, from year to year, as required for completion of the undertaking, and pre- sented calculations, based on the amount of trade at the date when he spoke, showing that the saving to the United States alone, dming the first year, when the canal was in operation, would be $8,500,000 more than the whole interest on the expenditm-es for twelve years. He presented computations proving that the yearly saving to England would be $9,950,348, to France, $2,183,930, to tlie United States, $35,995,930, and to other countries, $1,400,000 — an aggre- gate of $49,530,208 annually. Hence there were good reasons for believing that England and France would be desirous of being as- 16 Bociated with the Umted States in solving this great problem of the age. Thus the cost and responsibihtj to each would be moderate ; no international jealousy or exclusive policy would interfere with it; and the leading nations of the world would consult their own inter- ests by guaranteeing its neutrahty and safety in time of war. He lu-ged that the work would be a sound and proper investment for the United States to make, even if double the estimated cost were needful, in consequence of the increased benefits the new means of transit would confer upon commerce — the great lever which con- quers and maintains peace, and tends to bind the nations of the earth in perpetual amity. The speech was pecuharly instructive. It initiated in Congress a movement of vast moment to the national prosperity, and became the daily talk among thinking men, especially in mercantile and diplomatic circles. The events of the war diverted attention, but the stupendous undertaldng was delayed, not abandoned. It i§ acquiring increased mterest in the pubhc mind, and renewed official investigations, as to its cost and practicabiHty, have recently been made. During his first term in Congress, General Ward devoted liimself to the consideration of several other practical and important quesr tions. Upon his return home he was cordially welcomed by his friends and constituents, who assembled in large force to testify their esteem and respect for him, and tender their congratulation upon his fidehty to their interest, and the various trusts confided to his care. In October, 1858, he was nominated for re-election. His competitor was the Hon. George Briggs, who imited the Native American, and Eepublican nominations, by the withdrawal of Augus- tus F. Dow, the candidate of the latter organization. At the elec- tion in the following November, the vote for General Ward exceeded that of 1856, when he was first elected ; but the perfect union of the two other parties in favor of his opponent, made the odds too great to be overcome, and he was defeated. 17 Soon after the expiration of the first congressional term in 1859, President Buchanan tendered General Ward a foreign mission, a distinction which, while cordially appreciated, was respectfully de- clmed in consequence of an intention to engage more actively in his professional career, which had been partially interrupted by the pressm'e of pubhc duties. His relations with the President were of a most friendly and agreeable character, and he gave to the ad- ministration during the XXXYth Congress, a personal devotion and disinterested support which was at all times duly recognized. In 1860, Greneral Ward was nominated for Congress, by the Mo- zart and Breckenridge organizations, Udolpho Wolfe by the Tam- many Hall branch of the party, the Hon. George Briggs, by the sup- porters of BeU and Everett, and Augustus F.Dow by the Republicans. General Ward and Mr. Wolfe, submitted to a conference committee, mutually chosen, the question, which of the two should remain in the field. The decision was in favor of General Ward, and Mr. Wolfe, withdrew from the canvass, Mr. Briggs then also withdrew from the contest, and his friends imited in support of General Ward, who was chosen over Mr. Dow by a majority of 2,397. Li 1862, he was again nominated for re-election by the democratic party. His competitors were the Hon. Frederick A. Conkhng, radical repubhcan, and Orison Blmit, conservative repubhcan General Ward was elected by a large plurality, and had a majority of 1,107 over both opponents. From his earhest study of the history of his country, General Ward had beheved the decisive course taken in 1833 by Andi-ew Jackson, in reference to the • ordinance of nullification, passed by a convention assembled in South CaroHna, was the true precedent for action whenever any attempt to fhssolve the Union might be made. He held vnth Jackson, that " the rights of a people of a single State to absolve themselves at will, and without the consent of other States, from their most solemn ol)ligations, and liazard the liberties of the millions composing tliis Union, cannot be acknowledged ; " 18 that, " compared to disunion, all other evils are light, because that alone brings with it an accumulation of all ; that, if by the offensive act of any State, the crime of shedding of a brother's blood should fall upon our land, the mianimity with which the decision of the people would be expressed in favor of the Union, would be such as to inspire new confidence in republican institutions, and that the prudence, the w^isdom, and the courage, wliich it would bring to their defence, would transmit them unimpaired and invigorated to our children." General Ward, held that these views constituted the only rehable rule of pohcy for the democratic party and the nation at large, and hoped that the happy 'sequel to the bold and merciful action of President Jackson, would safely guide President Buchanan to like results. Hence he deeply deplored, as encouraging to seces- sionists, and fraught with the utmost danger to the people in all parts of the coimtry, the declaration of Buchanan, in his message of December, 1860, and in advance of the momentous occasion, that Congress had no power, by force of arms, to compel a State to re- main in the Union. Mr. Buchanan was among the last of the sm-- vivors of a race of men, who in their day, regarded themselves as faithful guardians of the Constitution and the Union. As a member V)f the House of Representatives, a Senator, Minister to England, Secretary of State and President, he was entitled to the highest con- sideration of liis countrymen. When many other eminent men in the North, wavered as to the coiu-se of action proper to adopt in the then existing crisis ; with his constitutional ad\dsers divided upon the issues of the day, it is perhaps, not surprising that he erred in his views, from a desire for a peaceful preservation of the Union. Gen- eral Ward, was of the opinion that if the President had pursued a similar course to that of General Jackson, and appealed to Congress to give Mm men and money, for the coming emergency, it would not only have checked the seditious acts of the Southern men ; but closed his administration with a popularity rarely equalled. General Ward promptly recognized the facts that the Govern- 19 ment did not begin tlie war, and tliat the seceded States, at the time the rebelhon was inaugurated, had nothing of which they could complain, that none of their prerogatives had been mterfered with ; none of their citizens had been burthened by taxation, and all their rights and institutions were under the protection of the United States. He held that they had gone out from among us under tlie pretense that they foresaw in the futm-e, "they should lose their just pohtical power and influence in the Union ; and, acting upon this self-imposed delusion, had drawn the sword wantonly and wdllfully upon the Government and loyal people of' the United States. Deeply impressed with these convictions, he took his seat in tlie XXXVIIth Congress, at the extra session beginning on the 4th of July, 1861, and gave a firm and consistent support to all well- devised efforts to crush the rebelhon. This session was entirely devoted to placing the army and navy in the requisite condition and supplying the other urgent necessities created by the war. The injustice of ^vithholding from New York those rights of coinage, which were granted to places so remote from the channels of trade, and so seldom named as Dahlonega and Charlotte, is one of the most flagrant wi'ongs existing under the Government of the United States. General Ward, who when in Congress was pre- eminently the commercial representative of the National emporium of trade, strenuously exposed this costly grievance, and urged the needful reform. In 1862, the Chamber of Commerce of the State of New York, presented to Congress a memorial, setting forth the importance of conferring upon the United States assay office in the City of New York, the privilege of coining with the national cur- rency, such portions of gold and silver bulhon, as may be deposited with the Treasurer at New York for that piu-pose ; and on the 15th of May, General Ward from the Committee on Commerce, made to the House of Representatives, a report in favor of the prayer of the memorial. He submitted also an act for carrying out his recom- mendations. Before impartial judges the opening paragraph of the 20 report, would by itself, have been sufficiently convincing. He said " It should require no argument to prove that the most convenient place, for tho purpose of coinage by the government of the United States, is the commercial cen tre towards which the chief lines of communication tend, bringing from various places, and more than to any other point, the precious metals, and distributing them again in pursuance of the natural and inevitable laws of trade. To send any article some hundreds of miles for the purpose of receiving a stamp or mark, as'a guarantee that it is genuine, and returning it again to the place whence it was sent, and where it is to be sold or used, is so self-evidently an useless and improper expenditure of public money that little more is deemed necessary than to state the facts of this case in the form of accurate statistics. Tried by the plain rules guid- ing men of common prudence in every day life, the singular extravagance of the present plan is manifest. No individual would tolerate a similar wastefulness in his own business." In the year before the report was presented, the cost of carrying gold and silver from New York, to be coined at the mint in Pliila- delpliia had been more than $71,755, without includmg the loss of tune to the depositor, or the risks which, under the most favorable circumstances, are attached to the frequent transfer of large smns, sometimes amounting to $1,000,000 at a single time. Thus the injury sustained by the public in that one year alone, was fairly estimated at $100,000, tlie full amount of the appropriation named m the bill under consideration, and enough to put the present assay office in complete order for coining all the gold and silver that wdll probably be offered for that purpose by o^vners and depositors at New York for several years to come. The report contained brief statements of the increase of the trade of New York, its proportion to that of the other trade of the coun- try, and of the amounts of bullion annually received m that city The whole amount of coinage at the two mints of Dahlonega and Charlotte, since their commcement in 1838 to 1861, was only $11,- 039,034, httle more than two-thirds of the average amount sent, at great expense, from the assay office in New York, for coinage each year of its existence. In the seven preceding fiscal years, the amount of gold mined in the United States, and received at the assay office in New York was some twelve times greater than that received at the mint in Phila- 21 delpliia ; wliile tlie amounts of foreign coin and bullion received at the ports of New York and Pliiladelpliia respectively, dm-inf^ tlie six years ending June 30, 1860, were more than ninety-eight times as large at New York as at Philadelphia. Those who have paid most attention to the subject will best understand the significance ot the following suggestions : " The full importance of coinage at New York, the central focus for trade in the prcf^ious metals on this, the chief continent for their production, may never be perceived until the leading commercial nations of the world have adopted'a uni- form system of decimal coinage, a project which is already regarded with much- favor by many thoughtful and philanthropic individuals in various countries, and would conduce greatly to the advantage of mankind, by facilitating commerce, and rendering the common representative of value in every nation intelligible to every civilized man. A greatly increased proportion of the bullion arriving at New York would then be coined there, if the desired facilities for that purpose are granted, and would become a universal currency throughout the globe." Few propositions were ever more clearly estabKshed than the one announced at the conclusion of the report, that " a faithful perform- ance of the trusts confided to Congress by the Constitution of the United States, requires that necessary facihties for coinage should be estabhshed in the City of New York, where buUion can be coined with the greatest degree of economy to the government, and the greatest degree of convenience to the largest number of om* citi- zens." It is one of the most striking instances of the favoritism of our times, and of the power exercised by local or special interests at the expense of the nation at large, that Congress did not comply with the reasonable recommendations made, and incontrovertibly supported through General Ward. The war intervened, and re- course to a paper cm-rency, rendering coinage less necessary for the time, gave to unjust legislators a power with wliich the reformers were unable to cope. On a return to specie payment, the subject will attract renewed attention. The statistical facts enumerated in the report were generally copied into the metropohtan papers. The conmaents were unanimous, and then- character may be inferred 22 from the apt and hnmorons illustration given in the Indejpendent It said : " General Ward, M. C, from New York, has reported from the House Commit- tee on Commerce, a bill, authorizing the coinage of gold and silver in this city, the spot where nine-tenths of the bullion and foreign coin are first received. No buisir ness man would think of opposing such a movement, if it related tO" his own per- sonal affairs ; but politicians, it is now generally supposed, sometimes legislate as though they had neither talent nor brains. Our Government, in this special mat- ter, acts like the man who built a saw-mill on the prairie, and then drew all his logs twenty-five miles to saw them." The early connection of General Ward with mercantile life, and his residence and associations in the city of New York, had led him to give to commercial subjects an attention which was not excelled by any member of either House of Congress. In connection with this tendency, his legal career had not only taught him to reflect much on the proper provisions of a uniform bankrupt law through- out the United States, but had filled him with sympathy for the honest sufferers with whom he had been brought into communica- tion, and enabled him to see that what was a measure of mercy to Buch debtors, would almost invariably be also a source of quick justice to creditors. His exertions in favor of such a measm-e began in 1858, as soon as he entered Congress ; and in 1859, when not a member, he had personally endeavored to induce the con- gressional committee, to which the subject had been referred, to lose no time in recommending this valuable legislative reform. It was owing to his efforts that the committee did not report adversely. The number of those who were imable to pay their debts, and whose lives were as hopeless for themselves as for their creditors, had for many years increased gradually ; but, soon after the rebel- lion be^an, additional thousands of men became insolvent, from the pressure of a national calamity as unexpected by them as if it had been a sudden conflagration. The leading merchants of New York and Boston, through their commercial associations, expressed their opinion that measures of relief would be peculiarly in harmony 23 with the beneficent institutions of a wise and liberal republic. General Ward was one of the foremost among those who advocated such a law as would give to each creditor a fair proportion of the assets of the banki'upt, and sharply and decisively define how first settlements between debtors and creditors should be made. A sketch of his pubhc career can be little more than a record of ejfforts to bring every day life and national afiiau's into legitimate harmony with reasonable and humane sentiments. Full of faith in this rule of life, he unremittingly served the cause of a bankrupt law with even more than his usual zeal. It commended itself to him, no less through his impartial judgment, than his earnest sym- pathies. In 1862, much disappointment was felt at the postponement, by Congress, until December in that year, of all consideration of the bill reported by the special committee, " to establish a uniform sys- tem of bankruptcy throughout the United States;" and he deemed it his duty to bring forward the chief points of the question to a fair and just consideration of the representatives of the people. In a speech delivered in the House of Representatives on the 3d day of June, 1862, he illustrated the subject by his customary use of statistics, so comprehensive, that they could not mislead. He traced the ruinous effects of the various expansions and con- tractions of the currency, and argued that, as the causes of the then recent insolvencies were for the most part entirely political, the unfortunate men " who have thus been ruined should no more be punished for these misfortunes than for any of the niunerous ac- cidents to wliich mankind are liable." He briefly presented the chief facts of the case in the following paragraph, saying : " The present indebtedness of the southern to the northern states is carefully es- timated to he about $300,000,000, of which $159,000,000 are due to the City of New York; $24,000,C00 to Philadelphia ; $19,000,000 to Baltimore; and $7,600,000 to Boston. By the losses thus incurred, many men of honor and integrity, whose means of meeting all their pecuniary engagements were as little doubted by them- 24 selves as by all who knew them, are undergoing the slow torture of mercantile failure — hopeless and lifelong, 'if they be not relieved by the government of their country. In not a few cases, the amount of their debts is many times less than that due to them by their former customers in the southern states. Last year, in the City of New York, nine hundred and thirteen mercantile houses became in- solvent, whose separate liabilities were in no case under $50,000, and in some instances, amounted to several millions. Out of two hundred and sixty-six leadin* dry goods houses reported sound when the rebellion began, only sixteen remain, and their condition is precarious. These firms cannot well be spared from our commercial circles at this present crisis. The common rules of humanity require our sympathy in their behalf, and no less do justice and a regard for the interests of the republic, requu-e that, after a strict examination of the aflairs of each insolv- ent, if he uprig&tly and honorably surrenders his property for the benefit of his creditors, he shall be permitted to begin the world anew." The following extract is a fair illustration of his characteris- tic reasoning, in which the facts of statistics and deductions from the principles of humanity and justice are harmoniously blended. He said : * " It is estimated that throughout our great commercial cities, in ordinary times, five per cent, of the persons engaged in business fail every year. Ninetj^-five per cent, of our chief business men become insolvent at least once in their life- times, and most of those who ultimately succeed, have, at some time, passed through the same ordeal, and been dependent upon the leniency or indulgence of their cred- itors. In many, perhaps in most cases, the honest debtor is met by his creditor in the spirit of justice. Creditors who adopt this line of action will surely not com- plain of a law making tlie course they pursue obligatory upon other creditors, thus preventing fraudulent and preferential assignments, and much expensive litigation and delay." Having stated the result of his own observation to be that in ninety cases out of a hundred where compromise had been offered immediately after failure and repelled, the creditors would after- wards be glad if they could compromise the debt on less favorable terms, but usually fail to realise anything — the debt becoming a total loss, he said : " An attempt to settle with their creditors is usually one of tfce first efibrts on the part of those who become insolvent. If the debtor foils in this, through the want of concurrence among his creditors, and the claims against him are pressed, ho foresees long years of thraldom and embarassment, and his next impulse is to secure provisions for himself and family. In his despair of meeting with justice, be often has recourse to many subterfuges, few of which ever reach the public ear ; but the common course is to make a preferential assignment, permitted by law, thus placing his assets in the hands of one or more friends, from whom he hopes to 25 obtain emplojonent or assistance in business, or, perhaps, support and money from the actual proceeds. The remainder of his creditors remain unsatisfied, and he bids them defiance. Creditors, on the other hand, fearing assignments of tliis kind, often submit to compromises whicli they linovv to be unjust. A proper banli- rupt law, prohibiting these assignments, would diminish, if it did not destroy, such dangers, and thus befriend the creditor. In many cases, through these assign- ments, or by other means, the debtor is tempted to keep all he can until some such terms as he thinks favorable, can be eflFected. From this time he leads a surrep- titious and demoralizing life. Perhaps one creditor alone objects to the offers made. The debtor is determined not to pay one unless he can pay all; It is necessary his family should be maintained. Time passes, and his assets are dimin- ished. Often the creditor fearing preferential assignments, hesitates to use legal measures. The only dividend that can now be offered seems paltry. The debtor finding that neither the world nor the world's law befriend him, and believing that the bondage of debt will be perpetual, not unfrequently sets aside the common re- straints of prudence and morality, and becomes an incubus and injury to society; instead of devoting his intellect and energies to its benefit. If of a nature too scrupulous and honorable to yield readily to temptation, his sufferings are severe and constant. He endeavors to provide for those dependent upon him; but their respect for him is diminished by his own loss of conscious independence, and the change expeiienced in the social position of them all ; arising not from the neces- sity of proper retrenchment — this he and they can meet — but, because society always attaches a certain degree of odium to the insolvent, who is thereby humilated, and often so far depressed, as to cause him to resort to dissipation as a means of obtain- ing a temporary forgetfulness. He feels weak and degraded in the eyes of that little domestic circle of his wife and children, of those whom he is bound by every honorable and sacred instinct of his nature to maintain and defend, at all legiti- mate hazards, by the daily labor of his life, receiving in return, as his natm-al right, the cherished equivalent of their affection and respect. He can bestow upon them nothing more than a temporary subsistence, taking care at best that he never has at his command more than the savings of a limited number of days. The law has done all it can to make honesty no longer the best policy for him, and the only hope he has of worldly prosperitj^, or of competence, consists in practicing dis- honorable concealments." The concludiug words of his speech were : " Societ}', itself, has at all times an interest in the subsequent life and exertions of the bankrupt. The hope or expectation of future acquisition by conducing to the industry, honesty and morality of the unfortunate debtor contributes to the welfare of the community. A due regard for the public good demands that the future acquisitions of the debtor who has faithftdly surrendered all he owned for the benefit of his creditors, should be placed unc^er his own control, and fully jus- tifies prudent and careful enactments for that purpose." At the present thne it is diffictilt to realize how, in a Congress of Representatives of the American people, the passage of a bankrupt law could have been so long delayed ; but the people of the agricul- tural districts, in whose piu-suits there is httle hazard, then under- 26 stood less thorougUy than they now do, the sudden . monetary revohition by which men of the best intentions, and of good business habits, are sometimes ruined. The imperfect operations of the pre- vious temporary enactments had also their influence. Congress postponed the fm-ther consideration of the subject. In the following session of Congress General Ward again took his place in the foreground in the House of Representatives as an advocate of a permanent banki'upt law, tending to prevent the waste of assets, both by its compulsory clauses and by opening out avenues of future, and hopeful employment to every debtor who passes through the ordeal Avith an unblemished reputation. He ably maintained that while such an enactment would be alike more profitable to the creditor, and more humane to the debtor than the customs ah-eady prevailing, it would also tend to " create and maintain a liigh standard of mercantile integrity and honor — a possession of inestimable value to the nation." The importance of the commercial relations of the United States with the other nations on this continent early engaged the attention of (jreneral Ward. He saw in the free developement of the material interests they have in common, the natm'al path to those friendly sentiments, and that homogeneity of institutions, which are essential to the most successful admission of such large populations into the Union, or to whatever other mutually beneficial arrangement may be most suitable to the occasion, when prejudice is disarmed and the in- fluence of commerce has brought the people on both sides into profit- able intercourse, and woven the powerful bands of such an alhance between them. The treaty providing for a reciprocal trade in certain articles between this country and British North America was, for several years, mutually satisfactory ; but the Canadian authorities raised the duties on manufactured goods to such an extent as to destroy its natural effects in promoting many branches of the industry of om' people. In some cases the results of the new legisla- 27 tion were so decided that mamifacturing establishments, witli their machinery, capital and men, were removed from this country to Canada. In this state of aifairs, the legislature of the State of Kew York passed concurrent resolutions, demanding a revision of tho treaty, expressing approval o^ the principle of reciprocity, and a desire for an extension of its application. It was seen that unre- stricted trade between the United States and Canada must be no less mutually beneficial than that between New York and Pennsylvania, Illinois, or any of the other states of the Union. In 1861 General Ward presented to the House of Representatives, and ably supported the concurrent resolutions passed by the legis- lature of the State of New York, in favor of " the co-operation and expansion of the commercial relations between the United States and British Provinces," and declaring, that although much restrictive legislation in Canada since the enactment of the treaty had modi- fied its natural operations, " free commercial intercom-se between the United States, and the British ISTorth American Provinces and Possessions, developing the natm-al, geographical and other advan- tages of each, for the good of all, is the only proper basis of our intercourse for all time to come." The House referred the resolutions to the Committee on Com- merce, in whose behalf he prepared and presented in 1862 a more elaborate report than had ever before been made on the same topic. It was no less comprehensive in principle than accurate in detail. He saw that om- commercial relations with the British Provinces were worthy of the closest investigation, not only from the importance of their territory and population, but for the yet more weighty consid- eration that the principles and plans necessary to a mutually satis- factory adjustment of the existing impediments to the natural devel- opment of trade with them, would have a valuable influence on the future pohcy of the United States, by forming the nucleus for such a system of exchanging the products of the industries of our people with other nations on this continent, as would be no less beneficial 28 than that of the citizens of our different states with each other ; thns regarding the adoption of just measures of reciprocal trade with Can- ada, as the proper precursor of yet more comprehensive arrange- ments. He sketched the characteristics of the men of the north, and announced in the following paragraph the principle which should animate the policy of the United States towards them. He said : " The climate and soil of these provinces and possessions,seemingly less indulgent than those of tropical regions, are precisel}^ those by which the skill, energy and virtues of the human race, are best developed. Nature there demands thought and labor from man, as conditions of his existence, but yields abundant rewards to wise industry. Those causes, which in our age of the world, determine the wealth of nations,are those which render man most intelligently industrious; and it cannot be too often or too closely remembered in discussing subjects so vast as these, where the human mind may be misled if it attempts to comprehend them in their boundless variety of detail, that sure and safe guides in the application of political economy, and to our own prosperity, are to be found in the simple principles of morality and justice, because they are true alike in minute and great affairs, at all times, and in every place. They im]ily freedom for ourselves, and those rules of frater- nity or equality, which enjoin us to regard our neiglibors as ourselves. We can trust in no other policy." He demonstrated, and by irrefutable statistics, not only the in- consistency of their recent legislation in Canada in connection with the treaty, but also the magnitude of the benefits which would accrue to both coimtries from actual reciprocity in trade ; and took decided ground in favor of a zollverein or customs' union, as being tlie only way of attaining it, unless the people of Canada should vohmtarily desire annexation to the United States. He was thus the first to introduce to the House of Representatives this project, whicli lias since received much consideration from the press and thouglitfid men in both countries. The report attracted attention from nearly all the leading journals of the Union. It was reviewed with approbation in New York, Buffalo, Oswego, and the north western states, and met with mucli consideration in Canada, where, although it occupied thirty eight octavo pages, it was printed at full length in the most widely circu- lated newspaper of the province, accompanied by the recommenda 29 tion that " it should be read 'and understood by every man of intel- ligence in Canada." The general sentiment of the Canadians at that time may be inferred from the expressions of the same journal, that " although they could live and prosper without reciprocal trade, they preferred freedom of intercourse with their American neigh- bors." It adopted the spirit of the report so fur as to say that " apart altogether from the dissatisfaction of the Americans with the treaty, there is a desire on the part of Canadians to see it improved and extended, and therefore om* government ought to be prepared to receive any proposition which the Americans may make, and consider it with respect, and a desire to come to an an*angement satisfactory to all parties." The Canadian Minister of Finance oflficially published, and caused to be extensively circulated, a long but ineffectual rej)ly to the charges of the report. The House of Representatives ordered fifteen thousand copies of the report to be printed, in addition to the usual number, and Mr. Layard, in the British House of Commons, in answer to enquiries, stated that several copies of it had been procured and would be laid upon the table, for the information of the public. It elicited f^ivorable comments from several members of the liberal party in Great Britain. In the following Congress the various memorials, relating to the treaty, having been referred to the Committee on Commerce, Gen- eral Ward, on its behalf, made another report, exhibiting such additional facts and statistics as showed the state of trade between the United States and Canada, down to that time. He recommend- ed that the president should be authorized to give notice of the abrogation of the treaty as soon as it might be legally done, unless, before that time, further arrangements, mutually satisfactory to both governments, should be made ; and that the president be also auth- orized to appoint three commissioners, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, for the revision of the treaty, and to confer with other commissioners, duly authorized therefor, whenever it shall appear to be the wish of the government of Great Britain to 30 negotiate a new treaty, based upon these principles of reciprocity, and for the removal of existing difficulties. The subject again excited much interest throughout the country, and on the 18th of May, 1864, in the same year, a joint resolution in accordance with the recommendation of the committee being under consideration, General Ward addressed the House. He urged that it was more reasonable and beneficial to remove whatever objection- able features then existed in connection with the trade, than to disturb the industry and investments of the large nmnber of our citizens engaged in it, and rebuked the pretentious interference of arbitrary and compulsory legislation with the common affairs of the people, in words which, although they arose naturally from the sub- ject, may well be regarded as a philosophical enunciation of the great general principle of trade. He said : " Upon the plainest principles of human nature, it is clear that the individual transactions constituting the vast aggregate of this trade since 1855, and amount- ing to more than fifty millions of dollars in 1863 alone, must, year after year have been sufficiently profitable, to remunerate those who produced the substantial materials of the exchanges, and those who were engaged in the traffic, who in their turn, could not have continued their business if they had not found in the people at large consumers or customers, who were benefited by the purchases they made." The subject was not discussed in a merely partisan spirit. The manner in wliich it was presented by General Ward ensured a more than usual exemption from this danger. He said : " I have the satisfaction of knowing that this is no party question, and that many gentlemen on the other side ot the house unite with me in eflForts to establish or extend such a liberal policy towards the proviifces, as shall mutually benefit both countries, uniting us together by the bonds which are the most powerful of all; those of mutual interest, well judged in necessary conformity to higher princi- ples. I am less desirous of an union of the Government, than of an union of the people. I do not wish to admit into our family of states, any who are not im- bued with the spirit of our institutions, and do not appreciate, as we do, the bene- fits resulting from them, or the principles on which they are established." He deplored such a course as would again impose duties on many of the articles exempted by the treaty, and which arc the sim- plest materials for the use of our ship builders and manufactin-ers, and necessaries for the support of hmnan life. The mutual exports 31 and imports of coal fiu-nish one of the best possible illustrations of the principle ; and he said : " Among the most important of these materials which should be supplied to our manufacturers and people, at as lo»v a price as possible, is coal, an essential ele- ment of household life and comfort, and the chief producer of the great labor-sav- ing power of steam. The exports from Ohio and Pennsylvania to Upper Canada, are nearly of the same value as those of the New England States and New York, from the Lower Provinces. In Canada West, the coal from the United States has superceded that brought from Liverpool and the Lov.er Provinces; and, at Mon- treal, the anthracite of the easterly portions of Pennsylvania also competes with coal brought from Liverpool and Nova Scotia. These minerals are not found in the geological formations of Upper Canada, and, as the forests disappear, and wool becomes too valuable to be used as fuel, that part of tlie Provinces will ulti- mately depend exclusively upon the United States, for the most economical supply of this necessary article. " Anthracite coal, although found abundantly on the eastern slope of the Alle- ghanies, is found no where in the colonies, and will always be imported by them, while for tiany purposes of fuel, in tue eastern states, economy dictates the use of the coal of Nova Scotia. Bituminous coal, of the kind most commonly used in the manufacture of gas, is not found in our territory east of tlie Alleghany moun- tains, witliin an available distance from our chief Atlantic cities. It would be needless to say that a trade of this kind is mutually beneficial. Under a system of free trade in coal, the people of each couutr3^ are supplied more cheaply than they otherwise could be with necessary light and fuel ; and both save, throughout large regions, the expefise and labor of carrying a heavy and bulky article for several hundreds of miles." He gave timely and prophetic warning of the course which '• has been taken by Canada in consequence of the exclusive course Con- gress thought fit to adopt. Including the union of the provinces, the construction of intercolonial railroads, the rapid progress in home industry, by which she has become independent of om* manu- factures, and our competitor in neutral markets, and the liberal policy by which so large a share of our western products has been diverted over her railroads and down the St. Lawrence. He closed his speech in the following words : " We are considering the commercial relations of one-eighth of the habitable sur- face of the world. Of this vast region, the United States and the people of the colonies, subject to a beneficent providence, control the present condition, and shape the future history. It has been given to us in the advanced condition of human civilization, as a new parchment, on which we may inscribe whatever characters we choose; and the opportunity will never return again in all the plen- itude of the present time. With nations, as with individuals, those habits and 32 tendencies are easily formed in yontli which are afterwards developed, and control the career through long years or centuries of the future. We may differ from the people of the provinces in opinion as to the best form of government; but other nations can judge better for themselves than we can for them, as to their own method of legislation. A prohibitory or exclusive system would be no less un- natural and injurious as to every commercial, political and moral result, than if we separated New York from Massachusetts, and both of them from Ohio, Illinois, or Iowa. Let us then regulate our intercourse, not by mutual fear or destruction, but b}'' creating, or rather developing, reciprocal benefits, in accordance with the manifest designs of Him who made the world, and who should never be mentioned except upon occasions worthy of Him. Such a system is doubly beneficial. ' It droppeth, as the gentle dew from Heaven, Upon the place beneath ; it is twice blessed. It blesseth him that gives, and him that takes.' Under its influence, assisted by a wise application of the reason with which man is endowed, old animosities will be forgotten, and, in da3-s to come, the people of both countries, seeing plainlj'^ that the social body of mankind, like the material body of the individual, is provided with a healing power, will find additional rea- sons to reverence Him by whom the universe itself was formed." One of the most interesting debates known in Congress, on any financial subject, ensued. Messrs. Morill, Washburne, Winter Davis, Baxter, Pike, and others, opposed the resohition, and General Ward»was ably sup- ported by Messrs. Sweat, of Maine ; Eliot, of Mass. ; Arnold, of Illi- nois; Pruyn, Littlejohn, Davis and others, of the State of JSTew York. But the cliief burden of the debate, on the liberal side, fell upon him. Mr. Sweat said that he hoped every gentleman in the House, who had not heard the speech of General "Ward, would read it, for in his judgment, the views "therein set forth, are not only correct and sound, but just and wise, and worthy the careful consideration of all who would look at the subject dispassionately." To his mind, it was the most exhaustive treatment given to any subject that had come before the House in that session. " And in this respect," added Mr. Sweat, " I cannot forbear saying, that it presents a very wide contrast to the remarks which have been made by other gen tlemen upon this question, and which, I say it in no offensive sense, have savored more of prejudice than of statesmanship." It was the duty of General Ward to sum up the debate, and correct 33 not a few extraordinary and erroneous statements which had been made by the ultra-protectionists in the course of the debate. He fulfilled his part with conscious reliance on the micontroverted facts and principles he had brought to notice, and without descend- ing to retaliation or invective. An amendment submitted by Mr. Arnold, of Illinois, with a view to enlarge the basis of the present treaty, was decisively negatived. Mr. Morill, of Vermont, then offered, as a substitute for the reso- lution reported by General Ward, another, merely authorizing the President to give notice of the termination of the treaty, without providing for any amelioration of it. The substitute was negatived by a vote of 82 to 74. The preamble to the resolution presented by General Ward, «i;3tierted that commercial intercom-se between the United States and the British ]^orth American Provinces, should thereafter be so ^ conducted as to be reciprocally beneficial to both parties. It was v^dopted, thus showing that a majority of the members of the House were in favor of the principle. The resolution also would have been carried if a few members, who, together with their constitu- ents, were conspicuously in favor of, and especially interested in, the utmost possible freedom of exchanges 'between the two coun- tries, had not been induced to believe that they would obtain better terms by postponement to the next session of Congress. But the postponement was only adopted by a majority of five out of one hundi'ed and fifty-nine votes. Just before the time for reconsideration arrived, the war feeling had attained increased intensity, and the exigencies and temper of the occasion threw all commercial considerations temporarily aside. As in the House of Eepresentatives at Wasliington, so also in the public press, the com-se suggested by General Ward, as to the proper commercial relations of the American continent, won many golden opinions from advocates of the most discordant partisan pol- itics. The New York Worlds in several editorial articles, support- 34 ed his views as to the establishment of a zollvereiu with Canada, and uro-ed " the Chamber of Commerce and om- merchants, who are at all times desirous of information which may lead to an in- crease of foreign trade," to give their careful attention to his sug- gestions, "inasmuch as our national debt and heavy taxation render it prudent, perhaps imperative, to exercise a wise forethought in stimulating the productive energies of om- people, by opening up new outlets in foreign countries." The Times pointed out the new and instructive information he presented, and his careful avoidance of " that hostile spirit which has so often led further and further from the proper objects of discussion, until the simple questions really at issue become hidden under heaps and incrusta- tions of prejudice, accumulated by the errors and hatred of many generations." The Tribune said that " great and pressing as the domestic questions are at this horn*, it is no time to overlook mat- ters of extrinsic but endm-ing interest," and that " the country owes its thanks to him for bringing so much industry and judgment to bear upon om' treaty relations with Canada." The Evening Post commended the report to the perusal of the ultra-protectionists ; and the Journal of Commerce testified that " it labors earnestly and honestly to promote that enlightened liberality of sentiment and mutual good-will, which it is for the interest of both parties to inculcate," adding that " its free circulation cannot fail to do good on both sides of the border ; and we hope that it will be widely distributed for that pm'pose." The Economist, after alluding to his exertions in behalf of a soun^ bankrupt law, and an American Zoll- vereiu, said it would be unjust to General Ward and some other ca- pable and laborious representatives and senators, not to acknowledge the fidelity and practical ability with which they applied themselves effectively to the business of the nation ; and added : " The speech of the Honorable Elijah Ward, on the commercial relations between the United States and the British North American Provinces and Possessions, is a model of statesmanly discussion. Its unpartizan spirit and breadth of view pre- sent a welcome contrast to the narrow party animus with which the great fiscal 35 and commercial questions of the day are now treated in Congress. Mr. Ward rises far above the common Congressional level, and in the treatment of a question that affects the interests ot the whole country, discards the clamor of local inter- ests, rebukes petty international jealousies, and calmly inquires what arrangement of the treaty can be made yieldmg the greatest advantages and the amplest j ustice to both nations concerned." Throughout his career in Congress General Ward bokUy main- tained the same opinions on financial subjects as are held by that intelligent and progressive class of men who are now known to the public as Kevenue Reformers. From the beginning of the monetary changes introduced in consequence of the war, he advocated such measures as it is now seen would have been most expedient for the country, and the adoption of whicli would have rendered present reform unnecessary. He firmly opposed the " Legal Tender " pol- icy of Secretary Chase, and others of the party in power. The Secretary of the Treasmy was led so far by the temporary pressure of the times, and the difficulties of his position, as to support by his official authority the pernicious doctrine that the decrease on the value of fictitious money, as compared with gold, was neither wholly nor for the greater part owing to the large volume of paper prom- ises to pay. While General Ward opposed the pernicious errors thus enunci- ated in high places, he fully shared in the deep anxiety with which the condition of our financial affairs, and the regulation of the cir- culating medimn, were regarded by thoughtful people throughout the north, from motives of their o^vn personal interest, and yet njore from patriotic devotion to the cause of unity in the great struggle for national existence ; and he knew that, with a large inflation of national cm'rency, not only would the cost of war be immensely increased, and be repaid in a monetary medium of greater value, but lavish and careless expenditures would engender prodigal cor- ruption, and the nation would be subjected to innumerable disasters, against whicIi no human forethought could guard. Yet he did not underrate the difficulties of the occasion. When speaking on tliia 86 subject in the House of Representatives, on the 15th January, 1863, he said : " When it was decided to adopt the principle of ' legal tender' there was no doubt that the majorities of both Houses, who voted for it, did so because they considered it the least objectionable of the measures under consideration. Here, permit me to say, that I know of no greater trial for a statesman or legislator than this, — to be compelled to choose between two measures when his judgment condemns them both ; when his only course is that laid down in the common maxim of life, to ' choose the least of any number of evils.' The whole question is full of difliculties arising out of the mutations of commerce, as well as the exigencies of nations, nu- merous theories and suggestions have been presented by prominent citizens in various parts of the country, but all experience has demonstrated the impossibility of securing lasting prosperity for any country which persistently adheres to the use of a legalized but irredeemable paper currency." He showed clearly and forcibly the evil effects then already pro- duced by irredeemable issues of paper money, and that they would be further increased by additional expenses. He illustrated by the following figure, the fallacies of those who were so hardy as to say that the cm*rency had not decreased in value : " It is in vain to affirm that gold has risen, but i>aper money has not fallen. The man who is in a sinking boat might as well say that the water is rising and his boat is stationary. Let him, if he is not out of sight of laud, not get engulfed above his eyes ; look at the shore while he can, and see whether the water is flooding its banks. The markets of the world where we sell our products, and buy many ar- ticles in return, are the true laud-marks as to the value of our currency, and they are, and must be as I have already shown, faithfully indicated by the rise and fall of the precious metals." He entered into a careful analysis of our own financial affairs, and of various historical precedents in other countries. The result of the irredeemable paper system had then by no means reached the height it subsequently attained, but the reflecting reader will recognize in the following paragraphs a faithful photograph of the time at which General Ward spoke. He said : " The merchant and contractor in making sales or agreements charge profit not only on the actual value of the articles they furnish, but on the value in paper money. The Oovern7nent, at tJie present time, pays for all it uses a premium of at least f