LIBRARY OF CONGRESS © • ft °o W ^^ 4$ <7V a"^ *> - «- -ft - • i*«3i '<%,_ \y. y: A *~% '«• * • • © • • A 1 I i ^ "^ 'FfWs v *<* * j€? V.. * EXTRACT FROM A SPEECH BY ALEXANDER H. STEPHENS, VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE CONFEDERATE STATES, Delivered in the Secession Convention of Georgia, January, 1861. This step, [the secession of Georgia,] once taken, can never be recalled ; and all the baleful and withering consequences that must follow, (as you will see,) will rest on the Convention for all coming time. When we and our posterity shall see our lovely South desolated by the demon of war which this act of yours will inevitably invite and call forth; when our green fields of waving harvests shall be trodden down by the murderous soldiery and faery car of war sweeping over our land; our temples of justice laid in ashes ; all the horrors and desolations of war upon us— who but this Convention will be held responsible for it? and who but him who shall have given his vote for this unwise and ill-timed measure (as I honestly think and believe) shall be held to strict account for this suicidal act, by the present generation, and probably cursed and ex- ecrated by posterity for all coming time, for the wide and desolating ruin that will inevitably follow this act you now propose to perpe- trate ' Pause I entreat you, and consider for a moment what reasons you can give that will even satisfy yourselves in calmer moments— what reasons you can give to your fellow-sufferers in the calamity that it will bring upon us ? What reason can you give to the nations ot the earth to justify it 1 They will be the calm and deliberate judges in the case ; and to what cause or one overt act can you name or point, on which to rest the plea of justification? What right has the North assailed ! What interest of the South has been invaded ! What justice has been denied ? and what claim founded in justice and right has been withheld ? Can either of you to-day name one governmental act of wrong, deliberately and purposely done by the government of Washington, of which the South has a right to com- plain * I challenge the answer ! While, on the other hand, let me show the facts, (and believe me, gentlemen, I am not here the advo- cate of the North ; but I am here the friend, the firm friend and £4 .5" 2 lover of the South mid her institutions, and for this reason I speak thus plainly and faithfully, tor yours, mine, and every other man's interest, the words of truth and soberness,) of which 1 wish you to judge, and I will only state facts which are clear and undeniable, and which now stand as records authentic in the history of our country. When we of the South demanded the slave trade, or the importa- tion of Africans for the cultivation of our lands, did they not yield the right for twenty years 1 When we asked a three-fifths repre- sentation in Congress for our slaves, was it not granted ? When we asked and demanded the return of any fugitive from justice, or the recovery of those persons owing labor or allegiance, was it not incor- porated in the Constitution? and again ratified and strengthened in the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 ? But do you reply, that in many instances they have violated this compact, and have not been faithful to their engagements ? As indi- viduals and local communities they may have done so; but not by the sanction of government ; for that has always been true to South- ern interests. Again, gentlemen, look at another fact: when wo have asked that more territory should be added, that we might spread the institution of slavery, have thej r not yielded to our de- mands in giving us Louisiana, Florida and Texas, out of which four States have been carved, and ample territory for four more to be added in due time, if you by this unwise and impolitic act do not destroy this hope, and, perhaps, by it lose all, and have your last slave wrenched from you by stern military rule, as South America and Mexico were ; or by the vindictive decree of a universal eman- cipation, which may reasonably be expected to follow 1 But, again, gentlemen, what have we to gain by this proposed change of our relation to the general government ? We have always had the control of it, and can yet, if we remain in it, and are as united as we have been. We have had a majority of the Presidents chosen from the South ; as well as the control and management of most of those chosen from the North. We have had sixty years of Southern Presidents to their twenty-four, thus controlling the Exec- utive department. So of the judges of the Supreme Court, we have had eighteen from the South, and but eleven from the North ; although nearly four-fifths of the judicial business has arisen in the Free States, yet a majority of the Court has always been from the South. This we have required so as to guard against any interpre- tation of the Constitution unfavorable to us. In like manner we have been equally watchful to guard our interests in the Legislative branch of government. In choosing the presiding Presidents (pro tern.) of the Senate, we have had twenty-four to their eleven. Speak- ers of the House, we have had twenty-three, and they twelve. While the majority of the Representatives, from their greater popu- lation, have always been from the North, yet we have so generally secured the Speaker, because he, to a great extent, shapes and con- trols the legislation of the country. Nor have we had less control in every other department of the general government. Attorney- Generals we have had fourteen, while the North have had but five. Foreign ministers we have had eighty-six, and they but fifty-four. s While three-fourths of the business which demands diplomatic agents abroad is clearly from the Free States, from their greater commercial interests, yet we have had the principal embassies, so as to secure the world markets for our cotton, tobacco and sugar on the best possible terms. We have had a vast majority of the higher offi- ces of both army and navy, while a larger proportion of the soldiers and sailors were drawn from the North. Equally so of Clerks, Au ditors and Comptrollers filling the Executive department ; the re cords show for the last fifty years, that of the three thousand thus employed, we have had more than two-thirds of the same, while we have but one-third of the white population of the Republic. Again, look at another item, and one, be assured, in which we have a great and vital interest; it is that of revenue, or means of supporting government. From official documents, we learn that a fraction over three-fourths of the revenue collected for the support of government has uniformly been raised from the North. Pause, now, while you can, gentlemen, and contemplate carefully and candidly these important items. Look at another necessary branch of government, and learn from stern statistical facts how matters stand in that department. I mean the mail and post-office privileges that we now enjoy under the general government, as it has been for years past. The expense for the transportation of the mail in the Free States was, by the report of the Postmaster General for the .\ ear 1860, a little over $13,000,000, while the income was $19,- 000,000. But in the Slave States, the transportation of the mail was $14,716,000, while the revenue from the same was $8,001,026, leaving a deficit of $6,115,785, to be supplied by the North for our accommo- dation, and without it we must have been entirely cut off from this most essential branch of government. Leaving out of view, for the present, the countless millions of dol- lars you must expend in a war with the North; with tens of thou- sands of your sons and brothers slain in battle, and offered up as sac- rifices upon the altar of your ambition, — and for what, we ask again 1 Is it for the overthrow of the American government, established by our common ancestry, cemented and built up by their sweat and blood, and founded on the broad principles of Right, Justice, and Hu- manity? And, as such, I must declare here, as I have often done before, and which has been repeated by the greatest and wisest of statesmen and patriots in this and other lands, that it is the best and freest government — the most equal in its rights — the most just in its deci- sions — the most lenient in its measures, and the most inspiring in its princi- ples to elevate the race of men, that the sun of heaven ever shone rtpon. Now, lor you to attempt to overthrow such a government as this, under which we have lived for more than three quarters of a century — in which we have gained our wealth, our standing as a nation, our domestic safety while the elements of peril are around us, with peace and tranquillity accompanied with unbounded prosperity and rights unassailed — is the height of madness, folly and wickedness, to which I can neither lend my sanction nor my vote. VIEWS OF JEFFEfiSON DAVIS IN 1860. In a debate which took place in the Senate of the United States, in May, 1860, between Jefferson Davis and Stephen A. Doug- las, with reference to slavery in the Territories, the former scouted the charge that there was any design at the South to dissolve the Union, in the following terms : — The last point which I will notice is his reference to the South- ern League. He reads from the Southern League constitution, or whatever it is — I do not know — to show that there was an organiza- tion to dissolve the Union. Does the Senator believe there was a lodge in that Southern League outside of the State of Alabama? Mr. Douglas. I did suppose so, for the reason that Mr. Yancey refers to it in his letter to Slaughter in terms of approval; and in the letter to Pryor, explaining the Slaughter letter, he says there is a well-matured plan throughout the Southern States, and approved by the best men in Virginia ; evidently referring to the Southern League as spreading throughout the Southern States, and then ex- isting in Virginia, with the approval of the best men. Mr. Davis. I know very little about other people's secrets, and have very few of my own to keep ; but I will say, that if there was a lodge outside of Alabama, I do not know of it. Further, I will say, that I do not believe there was. And more, I will say, from the best information I have, there was not one hundred in the organiza- tion in Alabama ; I have been told, about seventy-five. I do not think the Union was in any danger from them. I have great confi- dence in the strength of the Union. Every now and then I hear that it is about to tumble to pieces, that somebody is going to introduce a new plank into. the platform, and if he does, the Union must tumble down; until at last I begin to think it is such a rickety old platform that it is impossible to prop it up; but then I bring my own judg- ment to bear, instead of relying on witnesses, and I come to the conclusion that the. Union is strong and safe — strong in its power, as well as in the affections of the people; that it holds high prizes yet, and the danger is that it will overwhelm the States by its wide-spread patronage. The danger is consolidation; and I wish it was in my power to-day to strike three-fifths of the patronage of this Govern- ment from it, that the States might rise in their relative dignity, and the Union be less strong than it is — more strong perhaps in the affections of a virtuous people, but less powerful in its influence upon those who follow in the wake of spoils. But, sir, I have very little apprehension that the Union is about to be destroyed by sev- enty-five men anywhere; vert/ little apprehension that this great Gov- ernment can be crushed by a secret organization. No, sir ; it will require men, brave men, intelligent men, united and acting openly, defend- ing their firesides, under the promptings of the highest motive that sustained our fathers in the Revolution, whenever war shall success- fully be waged against this Government. 54 m