1 Rlffl m m m 111 I, ■ m\ i mm W v- -7* V. >, v» ^ - •O' X x o ^% /% *0\ otf ^ tin V^» ,; • x 00 .. Cfwreuter* OF SHAKESPEARE PLAYS. BY WILLIAM HAZLITT. LONDON: Printed by C. H. Reynell, 21, Piccadilly, FOR R. HUNTER, SUCCESSOR TO MR. JOHNSON, IN ST. PAUL'S CHURCH-YARD} AND C. AND J. OLLIER, WELBECK-STREET, CAVENDISH -SQUARE. 1817- T" TO CHARLES LAMB, Esq. THIS VOLUME IS INSCRIBED, AS A MARK OF OLD FRIENDSHIP AND LASTING ESTEEM, BY THE AUTHOR. CONTENTS. PREFACE - - - - . - - - . - vii CYMBELINE 1 MACBETH -, . . . | 15 JULIUS CAESAR ---*---.-- 33 OTHELLO - - 42 TIMON OF ATHENS - 61 CORIOLANUS - G9 TROILUS AND CRESSIDA - - - - - - 83 ANTONY AND CLEOPATRA 95 CAMLET ........... 103/ -.THE TEMPEST - 115 ^ THE MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S DREAM - - - - 126 ROMEO AND JULIET ....... 135 LEAR -_.„-. 153 ^RICHARD II. .---..... 178 ^VHENRY IV. Part I. and II. '.*^fc - r - ' ..- - - c 188 HENRY V. --.,,..,.-- -203 ^ HENRY VI. in Three Parts - 215 ^ RICHARD TIL 226 HENRY VIII. , . .237 KING JOHN - - ** 243 TWELFTH NIGHT ; or, WHAT YOU WILL - - - 255 ^THE TWO GENTLEMEN OF VERONA .... 265 THE MERCHANT OF VENICE - - - - - - 269 THE WINTER'S TALE - 278 ALL'S WELL THAT ENDS WELL - - - . - 287 LOVE'S LABOUR LOST -_..... 2 93 MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING - - - - - 298 AS YOU LIKE IT 305 THE TAMING OF THE SHREW 312 MEASURE FOR MEASURE - - - - - - 320 THE MERRY WIVES OF WINDSOR - - - -327 THE COMEDY OF ERRORS 331 DOUBTFUL PLAYS OF SHAKESPEAR - - . - 335 POEMS AND SONNETS 316 ERRATA. Page 21, /. 13— /or " and who" read " who." 66, I. 23— for " manners" read " marrows." 92, Z. 12— /or " what was coming" read " what is coming. 203, I. 5— for « himself" read " him." PREFACE. It is observed by Mr. Pope, that " If ever any author deserved the name of an original, it was Shakespear. Homer himself drew not his art so immediately from the fountains of nature ; it proceeded through ^Egyptian strain- ers and channels, and came to him not with- out some tincture of the learning, or some cast of the models, of those before him. The poetry of Shakespear was inspiration indeed: he is not so much an imitator, as an instrument of nature; and it is not so just to say that he speaks from her, as that she speaks through him. " His characters are so much nature herself, that it is a sort of injury to call them by so dis- tant a name as copies of her. Those of other poets have a constant resemblance, which shews that they received them from one another, and were but multipliers of the same image : each viii PREFACE. picture, like a mock-rainbow, is but the reflec- tion of a reflection. But ej^rjr_^ijJje^Jb^iracter inJShakespear, is as much an individual, as those in li£aitsej£^it is as impossible to find any two alike ; and such, as from their relation or affi- nity in any respect appear most to be twins, will, upon comparison, be found remarkably distinct. To this life and variety of character, we must add the wonderful preservation of it ; which is such throughout his plays, that had all the speeches been printed without the very names of the persons, I believe one might have applied them with certainty to every speaker." The object of the volume here offered to the public, is to illustrate these remarks in a more particular manner by a reference to each play. A gentleman of the name of Mason, the au- thor of a Treatise on Ornamental Gardening, (not Mason the poet) began a work of a similar kind about forty years ago, but he only lived to finish a parallel between the characters of Mac- beth and Richard III. which is an exceedingly ingenious piece of analytical criticism. Rich- ardson's Essays include but a few of Shake- spear's principal characters. The only work which seemed to supersede the necessity of an attempt like the present was SchlegePs very admirable Lectures on the Drama, which give by far the best account of the plays of Shake- spear that has hitherto appeared. The only PREFACE. ix circumstances in which it was thought not im- possible to improve on the manner in which the German critic has executed this part of his de- sign, were in avoiding an appearance of mysti- cism in his style, not very attractive to the English reader, and in bringing illustrations from particular passages of the plays themselves, of which Schlegel's work, from the extensiveness of his plan, did not admit. We will at the same time confess, that some little jealousy of the character of the national understanding was not without its share in producing the following undertaking, for " we were piqued" that it should be reserved for a foreign critic to give ic reasons for the faith which we English have in Shakespear." Certainly, no writer among ourselves has shewn either the same enthusias- tic admiration of his genius, or the same philo- sophical acuteness in pointing out his charac- teristic excellences. As we have pretty well exhausted all we had to say upon this subject in the body of the work, we shall here transcribe Schlegel's general account of Shakespear, which is in the following words:— * " Never, perhaps, was there so comprehensive a talent for the delineation of character as Shake- spear's. It riot only' grasps the diversities of rank, sex, and age, down to the dawnings of infancy; not only do the king and -the beggar, x PREFACE. the hero and the pickpocket, the sage and the idiot speak and act with equal truth; not only does he transport himself to distant ages and foreign nations, and pourtray in the most accu- rate manner, with only a few apparent violations of costume, the spirit of the ancient Romans, of the French in their wars with the English, of the English themselves during a great part of their history, of the Southern Europeans (in the serious part of many comedies) the culti- vated society of that time, and the former rude and barbarous state of the North ; his human characters have not only such depth and pre- cision that they cannot be arranged under classes, and are inexhaustible, even in conception: — no — this Prometheus not merely forms men, he opens the gates of the magical world of spirits; calls up the midnight ghost ; exhibits before us his witches amidst their unhallowed mysteries; peoples the air with sportive fairies and sylphs : — and these beings, existing only in imagination, possess such truth and consistency, that even when deformed monsters like Caliban, he extorts the conviction, that if there should be such be- ings, they would so conduct themselves. In a word, as he carries with him the most fruitful and daring fancy into the kingdom of nature, — on the other hand, he carries nature into the re- gions of fancy, lying beyond the confines of real- PREFACE. xi ity. We are lost in astonishment at seeing the extraordinary, the wonderful, and the unheard of, in such intimate nearness. " If Shakespear deserves our admiration for his characters, he is equally deserving of it for his exhibition of passion, taking this word in its widest signification, as including every mental condition, every tone from indifference or fami- liar mirth to the wildest rage and despair. He gives us the history of minds ; he lays open to us, in a single word, a whole series of preceding conditions. His passions do not at first stand displayed to us in all their height, as is the case with so many tragic poets, who, in the language of Lessing, are thorough masters of the legal style of love. He paints in a most inimitable manner, the gradual progress from the first ori- gin. " He gives," as Lessing says, " a living picture of all the most minute and secret arti- fices by which a feeling steals into our souls; of all the imperceptible advantages which it there gains ; of all the stratagems by which every other passion is made subservient to it, till it becomes the sole tyrant of our desires and our aversions." Of all poets, perhaps, he alone has pourtrayed the mental diseases, melancholy, delirium, lu- nacy, with such inexpressible, and, in every re- spect, definite truth, that the physician may enrich his observations from them in the same manner as from real cases. xii PREFACE. " And yet Johnson has objected to Shake- spear, that his pathos is not always natural and free from affectation. There are, it is true, pas- sages, though, comparatively speaking, very few, where his poetry exceeds the bounds of true dialogue, where a too soaring imagination, a too luxuriant wit, rendered the complete dramatic forgetfulness of himself impossible. With this exception, the censure originates only in a fan- ciless way of thinking, to which every thing ap- pears unnatural that does not suit its own tame insipidity. Hence, an idea has been formed of simple and natural pathos, which consists in ex- clamations destitute of imagery, and nowise elevated above every-day life. But energetical passions electrify the whole of the mental powers, and will, consequently, in highly fa- voured natures, express themselves in an inge- nious and figurative manner. It has been often remarked, that indignation gives wit; and, as despair occasionally breaks out into laughter, it may sometimes also give vent to itself in anti- thetical comparisons. " Besides, the rights of the poetical form have not been duly weighed. Shakespear, who was always sure of his object, to move in a suffi- ciently powerful manner when he wished to do so, has occasionally, by indulging in a freer play, purposely moderated the impressions when too painful, and immediately introduced a musical PREFACE. xiii alleviation of our sympathy. He had not those rude ideas of his art which many moderns seem to have, as if the poet, like the clown in the pro- verb, must strike twice on the same place. An ancient rhetorician delivered a caution against dwelling too long on the excitation of pity ; for nothing, he said* dries so soon as tears; and Shakespear acted conformably to this ingenious maxim, without knowing it. " The objection* that Shakespear wounds our feelings by the open display of the most disgust- ing moral odiousness, harrows up the mind un- mercifully* and tortures even our senses by the exhibition of the most insupportable and hateful spectacles, is one of much greater importance. He has never, in fact, varnished over wild and blood-thirsty passions with a pleasing exterior, — never clothed crime and want of principle with a false show of greatness of soul ; and in that respect he is every way deserving of praise. Twice he has pourtrayed downright villains; and the masterly way in which he has contrived to elude impressions of too painful a nature, may be seen in Iago and Richard the Third. The constant reference to a petty and puny race must cripple the boldness of the poet. Fortunately for his art, Shakespear lived in an age extremely susceptible of noble and tender impressions, but which had still enough of the firmness inherited from a vigorous olden time, not to shrink back xiv PREFACE. with dismay from every strong and violent pic- ture. We have lived to see tragedies of which the catastrophe consists in the swoon of an ena- moured princess. If Shakespear falls occasion- ally into the opposite extreme, it is a noble er- ror, originating in the fulness of a gigantic strength : and yet this tragical Titan, who storms the heavens, and threatens to tear the world from off its hinges ; who, more terrible than jEschylus, makes our hair stand on end, and congeals our blood with horror, possessed, at the same time, the insinuating loveliness of the sweetest poetry. He plays with love like a child ; and his songs are breathed out like melt- ing sighs. He unites in his genius the utmost elevation and the utmost depth ; and the most foreign, and even apparently irreconcileable pro- perties subsist in him peaceably together. The world of spirits and nature have laid all their treasures at his feet. In strength a demi-god, in profundity of view a prophet, in all-seeing wisdom a protecting spirit of a higher order, he lowers himself to mortals, as if unconscious of his superiority : and is as open and unassuming as a child. " Shakespear's comic talent is equally won- derful with that which he has shown in the pathetic and tragic : it stands on an equal eleva- tion, and possesses equal extent and profundity. All that I before wished was, not to admit that PREFACE. xv the former preponderated. He is highly in- ventive in comic situations and motives. It will be hardly possible to show whence he has taken any of them ; whereas, in the serious part of his drama, he has generally laid hold of something already known. His comic characters are equally true, various, and profound, with his se- rious. So little is he disposed to caricature, that we may rather say many of his traits are almost too nice and delicate for the stage, that they can only be properly seized by a great actor, and fully understood by a very acute audience. Not only has he delineated many kinds of folly; he has also contrived to exhibit mere stupidity in a most diverting and entertaining manner." Vol. ii. p. 145. We have the rather availed ourselves of this testimony of a foreign critic in behalf of Shake- spear, because our own countryman, Dr. John- son, has not been so favourable to him. It may be said of Shakespear, that " those who are not for him are against him :" for indifference is here the height" of injustice. We may sometimes, in order " to do a great right, do a little wrong." An overstrained enthusiasm is more pardonable with respect to Shakespear than the want of it; for our admiration cannot easily surpass his genius. We have a high respect for Dr. John- son's character and understanding, mixed with something like personal attachment: but he was xvi PREFACE. neither a poet nor a judge of poetry. He might in one sense be a judge of poetry as it falls with- in the limits and rules of prose, but not as it is poetry. Least of all was he qualified to be a judge of Shakespear, who " alone is high fan- tastical." Let those who have a prejudice against Johnson read Boswell's Life of him: as those whom he has prejudiced against Shake- spear should read his Irene. We do not say that a man to be a critic must necessarily be a poet: but to be a good critic, he ought not to be a bad poet. Such poetry as a man delibe- rately writes, such, and such only will he like. Dr. Johnson's Preface to his edition of Shake- spear looks like a laborious attempt to bury the characteristic merits of his author under a load of cumbrous phraseology, and to weigh his excel- lences and defects in equal scales, stuffed full of " swelling figures and sonorous epithets." Nor could it well be otherwise ; Dr. John- son's general powers of reasoning overlaid his critical susceptibility. All his ideas were cast in a given mould, in a set form : they were made out by rule and system, by climax, in- ference, and antithesis : — Shakespear's were the reverse. Johnson's understanding dealt on^ ly in round numbers: the fractions were lost upon him. He reduced every thing to the common standard of conventional propriety; and the most exquisite refinement or sublimity pro- PREFACE. xvii duced an effect on his mind, only as they could be translated into the language of measured prose. To him an excess of beauty was a fault; for it appeared to him like an excrescence ; and his imagination was dazzled by the blaze of light. His writings neither shone with the beams of native genius, nor reflected them. The shift- ing shapes of fancy, the rainbow hues of things, made no impression on him : he seized only on the permanent and tangible. He had no idea of natural objects but " such as he could mea- sure with a two-foot rule, or tell upon ten fin- gers:" he judged of human nature in the same way, by mood and figure: he saw only the defi- nite, the positive, and the practical, the average forms of things, not their striking differences, their classes, not their degrees. He was a man of strong common sense and practical wis- dom, rather than of genius or feeling. He retained the regular, habitual impressions of actual objects, but he could not follow the rapid flights of fancy, or the strong movements of pas- sion. That is, he was to the poet what the painter of still life is to the painter of history. Common sense sympathizes with the impres- sions of things on ordinary minds in ordinary circumstances: genius catches the glancing com- binations presented to the eye of fancy, under the influence of passion. It is the province of the didactic reasoner to take cognizance of those xviii PREFACE. results of human nature which are constantly- repeated and always the same, which follow one another in regular succession, which are acted upon by large classes of men, and embodi- ed in received customs, laws, language, and in- stitutions ; and it was in arranging, comparing, and arguing on these kind of general results, that Johnson's excellence lay. But he could not quit his hold of the common-place and mechan- ical, and apply the general rule to the particular exception, or shew how the nature of man was modified by the workings of passion, or the infinite fluctuations of thought and accident. Hence he could judge neither of the heights nor depths of poetry. Nor is this all ; for being conscious of great powers in himself, and those powers of an adverse tendency to those of his author, he would be for setting up a foreign ju- risdiction over poetry, and making criticism a kind of Procrustes' bed of genius, where he might cut down imagination to matter-of-fact, regulate the passions according to reason, and translate the whole into logical diagrams and rhetorical declamation. Thus he says of Shake- spear's characters, in contradiction to what Pope had observed, and to what every one else feels, that each character is a species, instead of being an individual. He in fact found the general species or didactic form in Shakespear's charac- ters, which was all he sought or cared for ; he PREFACE. xix did not find the individual traits, or the dramatic distinctions which Shakespear has engrafted on this general nature, because he felt no in- terest in them. Shakespear's bold and happy flights of imagination were equally thrown away upon our author. He was not only without any particular fineness of organic sensibility, alive to all the " mighty world of ear and eye," which is necessary to the painter or musician, but without that intenseness of passion which, seeking to exaggerate whatever excites the feel- ings of pleasure or power in the mind, and moulding the impressions of natural objects ac- cording to the impulses of imagination, produces a genius and a taste for poetry. According to Dr. Johnson, a mountain is sublime, or a rose is beautiful ; for that their name and definition im- ply. But he would no more be able to give the description of Dover cliff in Lear, or the de- scription of flowers in The Winter's Tale, than to describe the objects of a sixth sense; nor do we think he would have any very profound feeling of the beauty of the passages here re- ferred to. A stately common-place, such as Congreve's description of a ruin in the Mourn- ing Bride, would have answered Johnson's pur- pose just as well, or better than the first ; and an indiscriminate profusion of scents and hues would have interfered less with the ordinary xx PREFACE. routine of his imagination than Perdita's lines, which seem enamoured of their own sweet- ness — ■ « Daffodils That come before the swallow dares, and take The winds of March with beauty j violets dim, But sweeter than the lids of Juno's eyes, Or Cytherea's breath." — No one who does not feel the passion which these objects inspire can go along with the ima- gination which seeks to express that passion and the uneasy sense of delight by something still more beautiful, and no one can feel this pas- sionate love of nature without quick natural sensibility. To a mere literal and formal ap- prehension, the inimitably characteristic epithet, " violets dim" must seem to imply a defect, rather than a beauty ; and to any one, not feel- ing the full force of that epithet, which suggests an image like " the sleepy eye of love," the al- lusion to " the lids of Juno's eyes" must appear extravagant and unmeaning. Shakespear's fancy lent words and images to the most refined sensibility to nature, struggling for expression : his descriptions are identical with the things themselves, seen through the fine medium of passion : strip them of that connection, and try them by ordinary conceptions and ordinary rules, and they are as grotesque and barbarous as PREFACE. xxi you please. — By thus lowering Shakespear's genius to the standard of common-place inven- tion, it was easy to shew that his faults were as great as his beauties: for the excellence, which consists merely in a conformity to rules, is counterbalanced by the technical violation of them. Another circumstance which led to Dr. Johnson's indiscriminate praise or censure of Shakespear, is the very structure of his style. Johnson wrote a kind of rhyming prose, in which he was compelled as much to finish the different clauses of his sentences, and to balance one pe- riod against another, as the writer of heroic verse is to keep to lines of ten syllables with similar terminations. He no sooner acknowledges the merits of his author in one line than the periodical revolution of his style carries the weight of his opinion completely over to the side of objection, thus keeping up a perpetual alternation of per- fections and absurdities. We do not otherwise know how to account for such assertions as the following : — " In his tragic scenes, there is al- ways something wanting, but his comedy often surpasses expectation or desire. His comedy pleases by the thoughts and the language, and his tragedy, for the greater part, by incident and action. His tragedy seems to be skill, his co- medy to be instinct." Yet after saying that " his tragedy was skill," he affirms in the next xxii PREFACE. page, " His declamations or set speeches are commonly cold and weak, for his power was the power of nature: when he endeavoured, like other tragic writers, to catch opportunities of amplification, and instead of inquiring what the occasion demanded, to shew how much his stores of knowledge could supply, he seldom escapes without the pity or resentment of his reader/" Poor Shakespear ! Between the charges here brought against him, of want of nature in the first instance, and of want of skill in the second, he could hardly escape being con- demned. And again, " But the admirers of this great poet have most reason to complain when he approaches nearest to his highest excellence, and seems fully resolved to sink them in dejec- tion, or mollify them with tender emotions by the fall of greatness, the danger of innocence, or the crosses of love. What he does best, he soon ceases to do. He no sooner begins to move than he counteracts himself; and terror and pity, as they are rising in the mind, are checked and blasted by sudden frigidity." In all this, our critic seems more bent on maintaining the equi- librium of his style than the consistency or truth of his opinions. — If Dr. Johnson's opinion was right, the following observations on Shakespear's Plays must be greatly exaggerated, if not ridi- culous. If he was wrong, what has been said PREFACE. xxiii may perhaps account for his being so, without detracting from his ability and judgment in other things. It is proper to add, that the account of the Midsummer Nighfs Dream has appeared in another work. April 15, 1817- CYMBELINE, CymbelIne is one of the most delightful of Shakespear's historical plays. It may be con- sidered as a dramatic romance, in which the most striking parts of the story are thrown into the form of a dialogue, and the intermediate circumstances are explained by the different speakers, as occasion renders it necessary. The action is less concentrated in consequence ; but the interest becomes more aerial and refined from the principle of perspective introduced into the subject by the imaginary changes of scene as well as by the length of time it occupies. The reading of this play is like going a journey with some uncertain object at the end of it, and in which the suspense is kept up and heightened by the long intervals between each action. Though the events are scattered over such an extent of B 3 CYMBELINE. surface, and relate to such a variety of charac- ters, yet the links which bind the different in- terests of the story together are never entirely broken. The most straggling and seemingly casual incidents are contrived in such a man- ner as to lead at last to the most complete de- velopement of the catastrophe. The ease and conscious unconcern with which this is effected only makes the skill more wonderful. The bu- siness of the plot evidently thickens in the last act : the story moves forward with increasing rapidity at every step ; its various ramifications are drawn from the most distant points to the same centre; the principal characters are brought together, and placed in very critical situations; and the fate of almost every person in the drama is made to depend on the solution of a single circumstance — the answer of Iachimo to the question of Imogen respecting the obtaining of the ring from Posthumus. Dr. Johnson is of opinion that Shakespear was generally inatten- tive to the winding up of his plots. We think the contrary is true ; and we might cite in proof of this remark not only the present play, but the conclusion of Lear, of Romeo and Juliet, of Macbeth, of Othello, even of Hamlet, and of other plays of less moment, in which the last act is crowded with decisive events brought about by natural and striking means. CYMBELINE. 3 The pathos in Cymbeline is not violent or tragical, but of the most pleasing and amiable kind. A certain tender gloom overspreads the whole. Posthumus is the ostensible hero of the piece, but its greatest charm is the cha- racter of Imogen. Posthumus is only interest- ing from the interest she takes in him, and she is only interesting herself from her tenderness and constancy to her husband. It is the pecu- liar characteristic of Shakespear's heroines, that they seem to exist only in their attachment to others. They are pure abstractions of the affec- tions. We think as little of their persons as they do themselves, because we are let into the secrets of their hearts, which are more important. We are too much interested in their affairs to stop to look at their faces, except by stealth and at intervals. No one ever hit the true perfec- tion of the female character, the sense of weak- ness leaning on the strength of its affections for support, so well as Shakespear — no one ever so well painted natural tenderness free from affec- tation and disguise — no one else ever so well shewed how delicacy and timidity, when driven to extremity, grow romantic and extravagant; for the romance of his heroines (in which they abound) is only an excess of the habitual pre- judices of their sex, scrupulous of being false to their vows, truant to their affections, and taught by the force of feeling when to forego 4 CYMBELINE. the forms of propriety for the essence of it. His women were in this respect exquisite logicians ; for there is nothing so logical as passion. They knew their own minds exactly ; and only fol- lowed up a favourite idea,, which they had sworn to with their tongues, and which was engraven on their hearts, into its untoward con- sequences. They were the prettiest little set of martyrs and confessors on record. — Cibber, in speaking of the early English stage, accounts for the want of prominence and theatrical display in Shakespear's female characters from the cir- cumstance, that women in those days were not allowed to play the parts of women, which made it necessary to keep them a good deal in the back-ground. Does not this state of manners itself, which prevented their exhibiting them- selves in public, and confined them to the rela- tions and charities of domestic life, afford a truer explanation of the matter ? His women are certainly very unlike stage-heroines; the reverse of tragedy-queens. We have almost as great an affection for Imo- gen as she had for Posthumus ; and she deserves it better. Of all Shakespear's women she is perhaps the most tender and the most artless. Her incredulity in the opening scene with Iachi- mo, as to her husband's infidelity, is much the same as Desdemona's backwardness to believe Othello's jealousy. Her answer to the most CYMBELINE. 5 distressing part of the picture is only, " My lord, I fear, has forgot Britain." Her readiness to pardon Iachimo's false imputations and his designs against herself, is a good lesson to prudes ; and may shew that where there is a real attachment to virtue, it has no need to bolster itself up with an outrageous or affected antipathy to vice. The scene in which Pisanio gives Imogen his master's letter, accusing her of incontinency on the treacherous suggestions of Iachimo, is as touching as it is possible for any thing to be: — " Pisanio. What cheer, Madam ? Imogen. False to his bed ! What is it to be false ? To lie in watch there, and to think on him ? To weep 'twixt clock and clock ? If sleep charge nature, To break it with a fearful dream of him, And cry myself awake ? That's false to's bed, is it ? Pisanio. Alas, good lady ! Imogen. I false ? thy conscience witness, Iachimo, Thou didst accuse him of incontinency, Thou then look'dst like a villain : now methinks, Thy favour's good enough. Some Jay of Italy, Whose mother was her painting, hath betrayed him : Poor I am stale, a garment out of fashion, And for I am richer than to hang by th' walls, I must be ript ; to pieces with me. Oh, Men's vows are women's traitors. All good seeming By thy revolt, oh husband, shall be thought Put on for villainy : not born where' t grows, But worn a bait for ladies. Pisanio. Good Madam,, hear me-— 6 CYMBEMNE. Imogen. Talk thy tongue weary, speak ; I have heard I am a strumpet, and mine ear, Therein false struck, can take no greater wound, Nor tent to bottom that." When Pisanio, who had been charged to kill his mistress, puts her in a way to live, she says, tc Why, good fellow, What shall I do the while ? Where bide ? How live ? Or in my life what comfort, when I am Dead to my husband ?" Yet when he advises her to disguise herself in boy's clothes, and suggests " a course pretty and full in view/' by which she may " happily be near the residence of Posthumus," she ex- claims, " Oh, for such means, Though peril to my modesty, not death on't, I would adventure." And when Pisanio, enlarging on the conse- quences, tells her she must change Fear and niceness, The handmaids of all women, or more truly, Woman its pretty self, into a waggish courage, Ready in gibes, quick answer'd, saucy, and As quarrellous as the weazel" — she interrupts him hastily : — " Nay, be brief 5 I see into thy end, and am almost A man already." CYMBELINE. In her journey thus disguised to Milford- Haven, she loses her guide and her way ; and unbosoming her complaints, says beautifully, — . " My dear Lord, Thou art one of the false ones -, now I think on thee, My hunger's gone ; but even before, I was At point to sink for food." She afterwards finds, as she thinks, the dead body of Posthumus, and engages herself as a footboy to serve a Roman officer, when she has done all due obsequies to him whom she calls her former master (C And when With wild wood-leaves and weeds I ha' strew' d his grave, And on it said a century of pray'rs, Such as I can, twice o'er, I'll weep and sigh, And leaving so his service, follow you, So please you entertain me." Now this is the very religion of love. She all along relies little on her personal charms, which she fears may have been eclipsed by some painted Jay of Italy ; she relies on her merit, and her merit is in the depth of her love, her truth and constancy. Our admiration of her beauty is excited with as little consciousness as possible on her part. There are two delicious descrip- tions given of her, one when she is asleep, and one when she is supposed dead. Arviragus thus addresses her — CYMBELINE. With fairest flowers, While summer lasts, and I live here, Fidele, I'll sweeten thy sad grave ; thou shalt not lack The flow'r that's like thy face, pale primrose, nor The azur'd hare-bell, like thy veins, no, nor The leaf of eglantine, which not to slander, Out-sweeten' d not thy breath.' ■ The yellow Iachimo gives another thus, when he steals into her bed-chamber: — Cytherea, How bravely thou becom'st thy bed ! Fresh lity, And whiter than the sheets ! That I might touch — ■ But kiss, one kiss — 'Tis her breathing that Perfumes the chamber thus : the flame o' th' taper Bows toward her, and would under- peep her lids To see th' enclosed lights now canopied Under the windows, white and azure, laced With blue of Heav'ns own tinct — on her left breast A mole cinque-spotted, like the crimson drops I' the bottom of a cowslip." There is a moral sense in the proud beauty of this last image, a rich surfeit of the fancy,— as that well-known passage beginning, " Me of my lawful pleasure she restrained, and prayed me oft forbearance," sets a keener edge upon it by the inimitable picture of modesty and self-de- nial. The character of Cloten, the conceited, booby lord, and rejected lover of Imogen, though not very agreeable in itself, and at present obsolete, is drawn with great humour and knowledge of CYMBELINE. 9 character. The description which Imogen gives of his unwelcome addresses to her — " Whose love-suit hath been to me as fearful as a siege" — is enough to cure the most ridiculous lover of his folly. It is remarkable that though Cloten makes so poor a figure in love, he is described as assuming an air of consequence as the Queen^s son in a council of state, and with all the absur- dity of his person and manners, is not without shrewdness in his observations. So true is it that folly is as often owing to a want of proper sentiments as to a want of understanding ! The exclamation of the ancient critic, Oh Menander and Nature, which of you copied from the other ! would not be misapplied to Shakespear. The other characters in this play are repre- sented with great truth and accuracy, and as it happens in most of the author's works, there is not only the utmost keeping in each separate character ; but in the casting of the different parts, and their relation to one another, there is an affinity and harmony, like what we may observe in the gradations of colour in a picture. The striking and powerful contrasts in which Shakespear abounds could not escape observa- tion ; but the use he makes of the principle of analogy to reconcile the greatest diversities of character and to maintain a continuity of feeling throughout, has not been sufficiently attended to. In Cymbeline, for instance, the principal 10 CYMBELINE. interest arises out of the unalterable fidelity of Imogen to her husband under the most trying circumstances. Now the other parts of the pic- ture are filled up with subordinate examples of the same feeling, variously modified by dif- ferent situations, and applied to the purposes of virtue or vice. The plot is aided by the amor- ous importunities of Cloten, by the tragical determination of Iachimo to conceal the defeat of his project by a daring imposture : the faith- ful attachment of Pisanio to his mistress is an affecting accompaniment to the whole ; the obstinate adherence to his purpose in Bellarius, who keeps the fate of the young princes so long a secret in resentment for the ungrateful return to his former services, the incorrigible wicked- ness of the Queen, and even the blind uxorious confidence of Cymbeline, are all so many lines of the same story, tending to the same point. The effect of this coincidence is rather felt than observed ; and as the impression exists uncon- sciously in the mind of the reader, so it probably arose in the same manner in the mind of the author, not from design, but from the force of natural association, a particular train of feeling suggesting different inflections of the same pre- dominant, principle, melting into, and strength- ening one another, like chords in music. The characters of Bellarius, Guiderius, and Arviragus, and the romantic scenes in which CYMBELINE. 11 they appear, are a fine relief to the intrigues and artificial refinements of the court from which* they are banished. Nothing can surpass the wildness and simplicity of the descriptions of the mountain life they lead. They follow the business of huntsmen, not of shepherds ; and this is in keeping with the spirit of adventure and uncertainty in the rest of the story, and with the scenes in which they are afterwards called on to act. How admirably the youthful fire and impatience to emerge from their obscurity in the young princes is opposed to the cooler cal- culations and prudent resignation of their more experienced counsellor ! How well the dis- advantages of knowledge and of ignorance, of so- litude and society, are placed against each other! " Guiderius. Out of your proof you speak : we poor unfledg'd Have never wing'd from view o' th' nest ; nor know not What air's from home. Haply this life is best, If quiet life is best 3 sweeter to you That have a sharper known ; well corresponding With your stiff age : but unto us it is A cell of ignorance j travelling a-bed, A prison for a debtor, that not dares To stride a limit. Arviragus. What should we speak of When we are old as you ? When we shall hear The rain and wind beat dark December ! How, In this our pinching cave, shall we discourse The freezing hours away ? We have seen nothing. 12 CYMBELINE. We are beastly ; subtle as the fox for prey, Like warlike as the wolf for what we eat : Our valour is to chase what flies -, our cage We make a quire, as doth the prison'd bird. And sing our bondage freely." The answer of Bellarius to this expostulation is hardly satisfactory ; for nothing can be an an- swer to hope, or the passion of the mind for unknown good, but experience. — The forest of Arden in As you like it can alone compare with the mountain scenes in Cymbeline : yet how different the contemplative quiet of the one from the enterprising boldness and precarious mode of subsistence in the other! Shakespear not only lets us into the minds of his characters, but gives a tone and colour to the scenes he de- scribes from the feelings of their imaginary in- habitants. He at the same time preserves the utmost propriety of action and passion, and gives all their local accompaniments. If he was equal to the greatest things, he was not above an attention to the smallest. Thus the gallant sportsmen in Cymbeline have to encounter the abrupt declivities of hill and valley: Touch- stone and Audrey jog along a level path. The deer in Cymbeline are only regarded as objects of prey, " The game's a-foot," &c. — with Jaques they are fine subjects to moralize upon at lei- sure, " under the shade of melancholy boughs." We cannot take leave of this play, which is CYMBELINE. 13 a favourite with us, without noticing some oc- casional touches of natural piety and morality. We may allude here to the opening of the scene in which Bellarius instructs the young princes to pay their orisons to heaven : '* See, Boys ! this gate Instructs you how t' adore the Heav'ns ; and bows you To morning's holy office. Guiderius. Hail, Heav'n ! Arviragus. Hail, Heav'n ! Bellarius. Now for our mountain-sport, up to yon hill." What a grace and unaffected spirit of piety breathes in this passage ! In like manner, one of the brothers says to the other, when about to perform the funeral rites to Fidele, * ' Nay, Cad wall, we must lay his head to the east ; My Father hath a reason for't.'' Shakespear's morality is introduced in the same simple, unobtrusive manner. Imogen will not let her companions stay away from the chase to attend her when sick, and gives her reason for it — " Stick to your journal course ; the breach of custom Is breach of all /" When the Queen attempts to disguise her mo- tives for procuring the poison from Cornelius, by 14 CYMBELIXE. saying she means to try its effects on " creatures not worth the hanging," his answer conveys at once a tacit reproof of her hypocrisy, and a use- ful lesson of humanity — a/ ""Your Highness Shall from this practice but make hard your heart." MACBETH. " We might multiply such instances every where. The leading features in the character of Macbeth are striking enough, and they form what may be thought at first only a bold, rude, Gothic outline. By comparing it with other characters of the same author we shall per- ceive the absolute truth and identity which is observed in the midst of the giddy whirl and rapid career of events. Macbeth in Shakespear no more loses his identity of character in the fluctuations of fortune or the storm of passion, than Macbeth in himself would have lost the identity of his person. Thus he is as distinct a being from Richard III. as it is possible to ima- gine, though these two characters in common hands, and indeed in the hands of any other poet, would have been a repetition of the same general idea, more or less exaggerated. For both are tyrants, usurpers, murderers, both as- piring and ambitious, both courageous, -cruel, treacherous. But Richard is cruel from nature and constitution. Macbeth becomes so from accidental circumstances. Richard is from his birth deformed in body and mind, and natu- rally incapable of good. Macbeth is full of " the MACBETH. 27 milk of human kindness," is frank, sociable, generous, Hejs^ of guilt by golden opportunities, by the instiga- tions of his wife, and by prophetic warnings. Fate and metaphysical aid conspire against his virtue and his loyalty. Richard on the con- trary needs no prompter, but wades through a se- ries of crimes to the height of his ambition from the ungovernable violence of his temper and a reckless love of mischief. He is never gay but in the prospect or in the success of his villainies: M acbeth is full of hoj^^L^t^Jie_ibLQiights of jhe murder of -Duacan,^which.he is with difficulty prevailed on to jcommit, and of j^m^sja^fterJLts perpetration. Richard has no mixture of com- mon humanity in his composition, no regard to kindred or posterity, he owns no fellowship with others, he is " himself alone." Macbeth is not destitute of J^lj,ni[s„gX§xmrjathv:,Js accessi- ble to pity,Js even made, in some measure the dupe of his u xor iousness,.., jcaa ka the los s of friends, of the cordial 4ove,afJWs^ollow To say my wife is fair., feeds well, loves company, Is free of speech, sings, plays, and dances well j Where virtue is, these are most virtuous. Nor from my own weak merits will I draw The smallest fear or doubt of her revolt, For she had eyes and chose me." This character is beautifully (and with affect- ing simplicity) confirmed by what Desdemona herself says of him to ^Emilia after she has lost the handkerchief, the first pledge of his love to her. " Believe me, I had rather have lost my purse Full of cruzadoes. And but my noble Moor OTHELLO. 51 Is trite of mind, and made of no such baseness., As jealous creatures are, it were enough To put him to ill thinking. Emilia. Is he not jealous ? Desdemona. Who he ? I think the sun where he was born Drew all such humours from him." In a short speech of ./Emilia's, there occurs one of those side-intimations of the fluctuations of passion which we seldom meet with but in Shakespear. After Othello has resolved upon the death of his wife, and bids her dismiss her attendant for the night, she answers, 88 TROILUS AND CRESSIDA. She is a theme of honour and renown, A spur to valiant and magnanimous deeds.'' The character of Hector, in the few slight in- dications which appear of it, is made very amia- ble. His death is sublime, and shews in a striking light the mixture of barbarity and hero- ism of the age. The threats of Achilles are fatal ; they carry their own means of execution with them. " Come here about me, you my Myrmidons, Mark what I say. — Attend me where I wheel : Strike not a stroke, but keep yourselves in breath 5 And when I have the bloody Hector found, Empale him with your weapons round about : In fellest manner execute your arms. Follow me, sirs, and my proceeding eye." He then finds Hector and slays him, as if he had been hunting down a wild beast. There is something revolting as well as terrific in the fe- rocious coolness with which he singles out his prey : nor does the splendour of the atchieve- ment reconcile us to the cruelty of the means. The characters of Cressida and Pandarus are very amusing and instructive. The disinte- rested willingness of Pandarus to serve his friend in an affair which lies next his heart is immedi- ately brought forward. " Go thy way, Troilus, go thy way ; had I a sister were a grace, or a daughter were a goddess, he should tal^e his TROILUS AND CRESSIDA. 89 choice. O admirable man ! Paris, Paris is dirt to him, and I warrant Helen, to change, would give money to boot." This is the language he addresses to his niece : nor is she much behind- hand in coming into the plot. Her head is as light and fluttering as her heart. " It is the pret- tiest villain, she fetches her breath so short as a new-ta'en sparrow." Both characters are origi- nals, and quite different from what they are in Chaucer. In Chaucer, Cressida is represented as a grave, sober, considerate personage (a widow — he cannot tell her age, nor whether she has chil- dren or no) who has an alternate eye to her character, her interest, and her pleasure: Shake- spear's Cressida is a giddy girl, an unpractised jilt, who falls in love with Troilus, as she after- wards deserts him, from mere levity and thought- lessness of temper. She may be wooed and won to any thing and from any thing, at a moment's warning : the other knows very well what she would be at, and sticks to it, and is more go- verned by substantial reasons than by caprice or vanity. Pandarus again, in Chaucer's story, is a friendly sort of go-between, tolerably busy, offici- ous, and forward in bringing matters to bear : but in Shakespear he has " a stamp exclusive and pro- fessional :" he wears the badge of his trade ; he is a regular knight of the game. The difference of the manner in which the subject is treated arises perhaps less from intention, than from the differ- 90 TROILUS AND CRESSIDA. ent genius of the two poets. There is no double entendre in the characters of Chaucer: they are either quite serious or quite comic. In Shake- spear the ludicrous and ironical are constantly blended with the stately and the impassioned. We see Chaucer's characters as they saw them- selves, not as they appeared to others or might have appeared to the poet. He is as deeply im- plicated in the affairs of his personages as they could be themselves. He had to go a long journey with each of them, and became a kind of necessary confidant. There is little relief, or light and shade in his pictures. The con- scious smile is not seen lurking under the brow of grief or impatience. Every thing with him is intense and continuous — a working out of what went before. — Shakespear never committed himself to his characters. He trifled, laughed, or wept with them as he chose. He has no preju- dices for or against them ; and it seems a matter of perfect indifference whether he shall be in jest or earnest. According to him " the web of our lives is of a mingled yarn, good and ill together/' His genius was dramatic, as Chaucer's was his- torical. He saw both sides of a question, the different views taken of it according to the dif- ferent interests of the parties concerned, and he was at once an actor and spectator in the scene. If any thing, he is too various and flexible ; too full of transitions, of glancing lights, of salient TROILUS AND CRESS-IDA. 91 points. If Chaucer followed up his subject too doggedly, perhaps Shakespear was too volatile and heedless. The Muse's wing too often lifted him off his feet. He made infinite excursions to the right and the left. He hath done Mad and fantastic execution, Engaging and redeeming of himself With such a careless force and forceless care, As if that luck in very spite of cunning Bad him win all." Chaucer attended chiefly to the real and na^ tural, that is, to the involuntary and inevitable impressions on the mind in given circumstances: Shakespear exhibited also the possible and the fantastical, — not only what things are in them- selves, but whatever they might seem to be, their different reflections, their endless com- binations. He lent his fancy, wit, invention, to others, and borrowed their feelings in return. Chaucer excelled in the force of habitual senti- ment ; Shakespear added to it every variety of passion, every suggestion of thought or acci- dent. Chaucer described external objects with the eye of a painter, or he might be said to have embodied them with the hand of a sculptor, every part is so thoroughly made out, and tan- gible : — Shakespear's imagination threw over them a lustre — " Prouder than when blue Iris bends.- 92 TROILUS AND CRESSIDA. Every thing in Chaucer has a downright rea- lity. A simile or a sentiment is as if it were given in upon evidence. In Shakespear the commonest matter-of-fact has a romantic grace about it ; or seems to float with the breath of imagination in a freer element. No one could have more depth of feeling or observation than Chaucer, but he wanted resources of invention to lay open the stores of nature or the human heart with the same radiant light, that Shake- spear has done. However fine or profound the thought, we know what was coming, whereas the effect of reading Shakespear is " like the eye of vassalage encountering majesty." Chaucer's mind was consecutive, rather than discursive. He arrived at truth through a certain process ; Shakespear saw every thing by intuition. Chau- cer had great variety of power, but he could do only one thing at once. He set himself to work on a particular subject. His ideas were kept separate, labelled, ticketed and parcelled out in a set form, in pews and compartments by themselves. They did not play into one ano- ther's hands. They did not re-act upon one another, as the blower's breath moulds the yield- ing glass. There is something hard and dry in them. What is the most wonderful thing in Shakespear's faculties is their excessive socia- bility, and how they gossipped and compared notes together. TROILUS AND CRESSIDA. 93 We must conclude this criticism ; and we will do it with a quotation or two. One of the most beautiful passages in Chaucer's tale is the description of Cresseide's first avowal of her love. " And as the new abashed nightingale, That stinteth first when she beginneth sing, When that she heareth any herde's tale, Or in the hedges any wight stirring, And, after, sicker doth her voice outring j Right so Cresseide, when that her dread stent, Opened her heart, and told him her intent." See also the two next stanzas, and particular- ly that divine one beginning ce Her armes small, her back both straight and soft/' &c. Compare this with the following speech of Troilus to Cressida in the play. fC O, that I thought it could be in a woman ; And if it can, I will presume in you, To feed for aye her lamp and flame of love, To keep her constancy in plight and youth, Out-living beauties out-ward, with a mind That doth renew swifter than blood decays. Or, that persuasion could but thus convince me, That my integrity and truth to you Might be affronted with the match and weight Of such a winnow' d purity in love ; How were I then uplifted ! But alas, I am as true as Truth's simplicity, And simpler than the infancy of Truth." 94 TROILUS AND CRESSIDA. These passages may not seem very character- istic at first sight, though we think they are so. We will give two, that cannot be mistaken. Patroclus says to Achilles, " Rouse yourself j and the weak wanton Cupid Shall from your neck unloose his amorous fold. And like a dew-drop from the lion's mane, Be shook to air." Troilus, addressing the God of Day on the approach of the morning that parts him from Cressida, says with much scorn, " What! proffer'st thou thy light here for to sell? Go, sell it them that smalle" sele*s grave." If nobody but Shakespear could have written the former, nobody but Chaucer would have thought of the latter. — Chaucer was the most literal of poets, as Richardson was of prose- writers. ANTONY AND CLEOPATRA This is a very noble play. Though not in the first class of Shakespear's productions, it stands next to them, and is, we think, the finest of his historical plays, that is, of those in which he made poetry the organ of history, and as- sumed a certain tone of character and sentiment, in conformity to known facts, instead of trusting to his observations of general nature or to the unlimited indulgence of his own fancy. What he has added to the history, is upon a par with it. His genius was, as it were, a match for his- tory as well as nature, and could grapple at will with either. This play is full of that pervading comprehensive power by which the poet could always make himself master of time and circum- stances. It presents a fine picture of Roman pride and Eastern magnificence : and in the 96 ANTONY AND CLEOPATRA. struggle between the two, the empire of the world seems suspended, " like the swan's down- feather, " That stands upon the swell at full of tide, And neither way inclines." The characters breathe, move, and live. Shake- spear does not stand reasoning on what his cha- racters would do or say, but at once becomes them, and speaks and acts for them. He does not present us with groups of stage-puppets or poetical machines making set speeches on hu- man life, and acting from a calculation of ostensi- ble motives, but he brings living men and women on the scene, who speak and act from real feelings, according to the ebbs and flows of passion, with- out the least tincture of the pedantry of logic or rhetoric. Nothing is made out by inference and analogy, by climax and antithesis, but every thing takes place just as it would have done in reality, according to the occasion. — The character of Cleopatra is a master-piece. What an extreme contrast it affords to Imogen ! One would think it almost impossible for the same person to have drawn both. She is voluptuous, ostentatious, conscious, boastful of her charms, haughty, ty- rannical, fickle. The luxurious pomp and gor- geous extravagance of the Egyptian queen are displayed in all their force and lustre, as well as the irregular grandeur of the soul of Mark An- ANTONY AND CLEOPATRA. 97 tony. Take only the first four lines that they speak as an example of the regal style of love- making. " Cleopatra. If it be love, indeed, tell me how much ? Antony. There's beggary in the love that can be reck- on' d. Cleopatra. I'll set a bourn how far to be belov'd. Antony. Then must thou needs find out new heav'n, new earth." The rich and poetical description of her per- son, beginning— '* The barge she sat in, like a burnish'd throne, Burnt on the water j the poop was beaten gold, Purple the sails, and so perfumed, that The winds were love-sick" — seems to prepare the way for, and almost to jus- tify the subsequent infatuation of Antony when in the sea-fight at Actium, he leaves the battle, and " like a doating mallard" follows her flying sails. Few things in Shakespear (and we know of nothing in any other author like them) have more of that local truth of imagination and cha- racter than the passage in which Cleopatra is represented conjecturing what were the employ- ments of Antony in his absence. " He's speak- ing now, or murmuring — Where's my serpent of old Nile?" Or again, when she says to Antony, after the defeat at Actium, and his summoning H 98 ANTONY AND CLEOPATRA. up resolution to risk another fight — " It is my birth-day; 1 had thought to have held it poor; but since my lord is Antony again, I will be Cleopatra." Perhaps the finest burst of all is Antony's rage after his final defeat when he comes in, and surprises the messenger of Csesar kissing her hand— (< To let a fellow that will take rewards, And say, God quit you, be familiar with, My play-fellow, your hand -, this kingly seal, And plighter of high hearts." It is no wonder that he orders him to be whip- ped ; but his low condition is not the true reason : there is another feeling which lies deeper, though Antony's pride would not let him shew it, except by his rage ; he suspects the fellow to be Caesar's proxy. Cleopatra's whole character is the triumph of the voluptuous, of the love of pleasure and the power of giving it, over every other considera- tion. Octavia is a dull foil to her, and Fulvia a shrew and shrill-tongued. What a picture do those lines give of her — Enter Steward. Regan. I know't, my sister's • this approves her letter, That she would soon be here. — Is your lady come ? Lear. This is a slave, whose easy-borrow'd pride Dwells in the fickle grace of her he follows : Out, varlet, from my sight ! Cornwall. What means your grace ? Lear. Who stock'd my servant ? Regan, I have good hope Thou did'st not know on't. — — Who comes here ? O heavens, Enter Gone rill. If you do love old men, if your sweet sway Allow obedience, if yourselves are old, Make it your cause 5 send down, and take my part ! — Art not asham'd to look upon this beard? — [lb Goner ill. O, Regan, wilt thou take her by the hand ? Gonerill. Why not by the hand, sir ? How have I of- fended ? All's not offence, that indiscretion finds, And dotage terms so. Lear. O, sides, you are too tough ! Will you yet hold ? — How came my man i' the stocks ? Cornwall. I set him there, sir : but his own disorders Deserv'd much less advancement. Lear. You ! did you ? Regan. I pray you, father, being weak, seem so. If, till the expiration of your month, You will return and sojourn with my sister, Dismissing half your train, come then to me} 168 LEAR. I am now from home,, and out of that provision Which shall be needful for your entertainment. Lear. Return to her, and fifty men dismiss'd ? No, rather I abjure all roofs, and choose To be a comrade with the wolf and owl To wage against the enmity o' the air* Necessity's sharp pinch ! Return with her ! Why, the hot-blooded France, that dowerless took Our youngest born, I could as well be brought To knee his throne, and squire-like pension beg To keep base life afoot. Return with her ! Persuade me rather to be slave and sumpter To this detested groom. [Looking on the Steward. Gonerill. At your choice, sir. Lear. Now, I pr'ythee, daughter, do not make me mad j I will not trouble thee, my child ; farewell : We'll no more meet, no more see one another : But yet thou art my flesh, my blood, my daughter j Or, rather, a disease that's in my flesh, Which I must needs call mine : thou art a bile, A plague-sore, an embossed carbuncle, In my corrupted blood. But I'll not chide thee ; Let shame come when it will, I do not call it : I did not bid the thunder-bearer shoot, Nor tell tales of thee to high-judging Jove : Mend, when thou canst ; be better, at thy leisure : I can be patient ; I can stay with Regan, I, and my hundred knights. Regan. Not altogether so, sir ; I look'd not for you yet, nor am provided For your fit welcome : Give ear, sir, to my sister j For those that mingle reason with your passion Must be content to think you old, and so But she knows what she does. Lear. Is this well spoken now ? LEAR. 169 Regan, I dare avouch it, sir : What, fifty followers 2 Is it not well ? What should you need of more ? Yea, or so many ? Sith that both charge and danger Speak 'gainst so great a number ? How, in one house, Should many people, under two commands, Hold amity ? 'Tis hard -, almost impossible. Gonerill. Why might not you, my lord, receive at- tendance From those that she calls servants, or from mine } Regan. Why not, my lord ? If then they chanc'd to slack you, We would controul them : if you will come to me (For now I spy a danger) I entreat you To bring but five-and- twenty ; to no more Will I give place, or notice. Lear. I gave you all Regan. And in good time you gave it. Lear. Made you my guardians, my depositaries ; But kept a reservation to be follow'd With such a number : what, must I come to you With five-and-twenty, Regan ! said you so ? Regan. And speak it again, my lord -, no more with me. Lear. Those wicked creatures yet do look well-favourM, When others are more wicked ; not being the worst, Stands in some rank of praise : I'll go with thee -, \To Gonerill Thy fifty yet doth double five-and-twenty, And thou art twice her love. Gonerill. Hear me, my lord j What need you five-and-twenty, ten, or five, To follow in a house, where twice so many Have a command to tend you ? Regan. What need one ? Lear. O, reason not the need : our basest beggars Are in the poorest thing superfluous : 170 LEAR. Allow not nature more than nature needs, Man's life is cheap as beast's : thou art a lady ; . If only to go warm were gorgeous, Why, nature needs not what thou gorgeous wear'st 5 Which scarcely keeps thee warm. But, for true need You heavens, give me that patience which I need ! You see me here, you gods ; a poor old man, As full of grief as age ; wretched in both ! If it be you that stir these daughters' hearts Against their father, fool me not so much To bear it tamely j touch me with noble anger ! O, let no woman's weapons, water-drops, Stain my man's cheeks ! No, you unnatural hags, I will have such revenges on you both, That all the world shall 1 will do such things What they are, yet I know not ; but they shall be The terrors of the earth. You think, I'll weep : No, I'll not weep : I have full cause of weeping ; but this heart Shall break into a hundred thousand flaws, Or e'er I'll weep : O, fool, I shall go mad ! [Exeunt Lear, Gloster, Kent, and jPooZ." If there is any thing in any author like this yearning of the heart, these throes of tender- ness, this profound expression of all that can be thought and felt in the most heart-rending situ- ations, we are glad of it ; but it is in some au- thor that we have not read. The scene in the storm, where he is exposed to all the fury of the elements, though grand and terrible, is not so fine, but the moralising LEAR. 171 scenes with Mad Tom, Kent, and Gloster, are upon a par with the former. His exclamation in the supposed trial-scene of his daughters, " See the little dogs and all, Tray, Blanch, and Sweetheart, see they bark at me," his issuing his orders, " Let them anatomize Regan, see what breeds about her heart/' and his reflection when he sees the misery of Edgar, " Nothing but his unkind daughters could have brought him to this," are in a style of pathos, where the extremest resources of the imagination are called in to lay open the deepest movements of the heart, which was peculiar to Shakespear. In the same style and spirit is his interrupting the Fool who asks, " whether a madman be a gentleman or a yeo- man," by answering " A king, a king !" — The indirect part that Gloster takes in these scenes where his generosity leads him to relieve Lear and resent the cruelty of his daughters, at the very time that he is himself instigated to seek the life of his son, and suffering under the sting of his supposed ingratitude, is a striking accompaniment to the situation of Lear. In- deed, the manner in which the threads of the story are woven together is almost as wonderful in the way of art as the carrying on the tide of passion, still varying and unimpaired, is on the score of nature. Among the remarkable in- stances of this kind are Edgar's meeting with his old blind father ; the deception he practises 172 LEAR. upon him when he pretends to lead him to the top of Dover-cliff — " Come on, sir, here's the place/' to prevent his ending his life and mise- ries together; his encounter with the perfidious Steward whom he kills, and his finding the let- ter from Gonerill to his brother upon him which leads to the final catastrophe, and brings the wheel of Justice " full circle home" to the guilty parties. The bustle and rapid succession of events in the last scenes is surprising. But the meeting between Lear and Cordelia is by far the most affecting part of them. It has all the wild- ness of poetry, and all the heartfelt truth of na- ture. The previous account of her reception of the news of his unkind treatment, her involuntary reproaches to her sisters, " Shame, ladies, shame," Lear's backwardness to see his daughter, the picture of the desolate state to which he is re- duced, " Alack, 'tis he ; why he was met even now, as mad as the vex'd sea, singing aloud," only prepare the way for and heighten our expec- tation of what follows, and assuredly this ex- pectation is not disappointed when through the tender care of Cordelia he revives and recollects her. f ' Cordelia. How does my royal lord 1 How fares your majesty ! Lear. You do me wrong, to take me out o* the grave : Thou art a soul in bliss 5 but I am bound LEAH. 173 Upon a wheel of fire, that mine own tears Do scald like molten lead. Cordelia. Sir, do you know me ? Lear. You are a spirit I know : when did you die ? Cordelia. Still, still, far wide ! Physician. He's scarce awake j let him alone awhile. Lear. Where have I been ? Where am I ? — Fair day- light 3 I am mightily abus'd. — I should even die with pity, To see another thus.— r4 know not what to say. I will not swear these are my hands : — let's see 5 I feel this pin prick. 'Would I were assur'd Of my condition. Cordelia. O, look upon me, sir, And hold your hands in benediction o'er me :— — No, sir> you must not kneel. Lear. Pray, do not mock me : 1 am a very foolish fond old man, Fourscore and upward ; Not an hour more, nor less : and, to deal plainly, I fear, I am not in my perfect mind. Methinks, I shou'd know you, and know this man j Yet I am doubtful : for I am mainly ignorant What place this is ; and all the skill I have Remembers not these garments 3 nor 1 know not Where I did lodge last night : do not laugh at me ; For, as I am a man, I think this lady To be my child Cordelia. Cordelia. And so I am, I am!" Almost equal to this in awful beauty is their consolation of each other when, after the triumph of their enemies, they are led to prison. 174 LEAR. (l Cordelia. We are not the first, Who, with best meaning, have incurr'd the worst. For thee, oppressed king, am I cast down 5 Myself could else out-frown false fortune's frown. — Shall we not see these daughters, and these sisters ? Lear. No, no, no, no ! Come, let's away to prison : We two alone will sing like birds i' the cage : When thou dost ask me blessing, I'll kneel down, And ask of thee forgiveness : so we'll live, And pray, and sing, and tell old tales, and laugh At gilded butterflies, and hear poor rogues Talk of court news ; and we'll talk with them too — Who loses, and who wins ; who's in, who's outj — And take upon us the mystery of things, As if we were God's spies : and we'll wear out, In a wall'd prison, packs and sects of great ones, That ebb and flow by the moon. Edmund. Take them away. Lear. Upon such sacrifices, my Cordelia, The gods themselves throw incense." The concluding events are sad, painfully sad; but their pathos is extreme. The oppression of the feelings is relieved by the very interest we take in the misfortunes of others, and by the re- flections to which they give birth. Cordelia is hanged in prison by the orders of the bastard Edmund, which are known too late to be coun- termanded, and Lear dies broken-hearted, la- menting over her. tc Lear. And my poor fool is hang'd ! No, no, no life : Why should a dog, a horse, a rat, have life, LEAR. 175 And thou no breath at all ? O, thou wilt come no more, Never, never, never, never, never ! Pray you, undo this button : thank you, sir." He dies, and indeed we feel the truth of what Kent says on the occasion —