ra- ^% X ^^- -^<^' A^ ..^^ /.:- vV ^^ ^'^' ^^. ' .-^^ ^^^^. A- '^. c?-^ i' ^^ <^ ^^.. C^ .■1^^" -X -r, '/' ^c. \^ ^^ oX' ,^-^ ■^^.- ^A V^^ V' ,^\' ,x^ x^ >P^... ^^. .0^ "O ./■ \' A' ^ •^oo^' - ^3 ."^^ -oo' J. -J o- it -v / < •- ,6 ,^^ % ^^ ^ * V 1> - ' MODEM HISTORY; 53^»- PROM THE Coming of Christ And Change of the Roman Republic into an Empire, TO THE Tear of Our Lord 186 7. <^' Saith iS|ue.^tions, ittogtd to the Ifec of ^diools. By PETER FRED ET, D. D. » ♦ Professor of History in Saint Mart's College, Baltimore, Author ok "Ancient History," &c. &c. Hiatoria testis temporum, lux veritatis, vita memorise, magistra vitae, nnntia vetustatis. Cicer. lib. ii. de Orat. e. ix., n. 3G. 22c? Edition, carefully Revised, Enlarged and Improved, vVi^J^'V "^^ ^^^^^r. \^' C BALTIMORE: -^ ^^ VVashV: i- Published by John Murphy & Co. Marble Building, 182 Baltimore street. Sold by Booksellers Generally. 1867. Entereb according to the Act of Congress, in the year 1867, by John Murphy, in the Clerk's Office, of the District Court of Maryland. ADVERTISEMENT To THE Newly Revised and Enlarged Edition of 1867. The many important events which have occurred, and the changes which have taken place in the Republics and Kingdoms of the World since 1854, have induced the publishers to issue a new edition, and bring the continuation of the History down to the present time. Much that was true thirteen years ago, has been so greatly modified since, as to ren- der, on many pages, a change of dates, or a new version neeessary. In- deed several entire chapters have been added to fill the void, which rapidly accumulating facts at home and abroad had left in the History. We are happy to have obtained the services of our learned author's Reverend collaborators, some of whom assisted him in correcting the pre- vious editions. The fidelity and accuracy with which they have com- pleted this resumd, will, we feel confident, make it equal, if not superior to any similar compilation in this country. Especial attention has also been given to the typography; every little blemish that may have existed in previous editions has been carefully removed, and this twenty second edition may be considered almost a new book. Baltimore, Jvdy, 1867. Author's Preface. The utility of History as a branch of public and private instruction has always been admitted. Cicero calls it "the witness of ages, the torch of truth, the life of memory, the oracle of life, the interpreter of the past," and does not hesitate (o say, that " to be ignorant of what has happened before one's birth, is nothing less than to remain in a continual state of childhood." (Cicer. in orat. n. xxxiv.) Plutarch informs us that Cato the Censor, whose name and eminent qualities reflected so much honor upon the last days of the Roman Republic, composed for his infant son, and, with his own hand, wrote in large characters a descrip- tion of remarkable actions taken from the lives of illustrious Romans; in order, said he, that this child might be enabled, from his very infancy, and without leaving the paternal roof, to become acquainted with the great men of his coun- try, and to imitate those ancient models of probity and virtue. History is an immense repository, whence we may, with little labor, derive extensive knowledge, and draw many instructive and useful lessons; nor is there any study (except that of Religion) better calculated to improve all the faculties of the soul. By its means, the memorj'- is furnished with a multitude o^interesting events; the judgment continually improves, from the assiduous attention which is given to objects well deserving of notice; and experience, so necessary in life, is easilj' acquired, because we appropriate to ourselves that of others, and become wise at their expense. History conduces also wonderfully to the improvement of the heart: every where it affords moral examples adapted to the different stations and conditions of social life ; every where it presents for imitation models of courage, of patriotism, probity, disinterestedness, generous sentiments and heroic antions. Its pages, indeed, are frequently filled with the narrative of various crimes; but these it mentions only to inspire us with horror for them, and to convince every one, that unruly passions, besides degrading IV . PREFACE. hnmauity, generally prove the cause of the subversion of empires, not less than of the ruin of private individuals and families. History gives us another very important instruction, in the continual change and succession of kingdoms and empires. There we behold the all-wise and powerful Providence of God displaying itself in the course of human affairs; sometimes granting to his people good and virtuous rulers ; at other times, per- mitting political storms to burst forth, wars to rage, and wicked men to reign for the chastisement of nations; then restoring tranquillity, and rendering subscr- ■vient to his designs, even those events in which our limited reason can perceive only the agency of creatures. Thus we are taught to humble ourselves under the mighty hand of God, to refer every prosperous effect to Him, as its only real and independent cause, and to expect from Him alone a lasting happiness. These advantages are to be found chiefly in Modern Historj% which extending to many more countries than the history of former ages, presents us with more numerous and rem^arkable instances of the effects of divine justice upon kings and nations. It likewise abounds, much more than the periods long since past, in heroic deed^, and, including the times of the Christian era, exhibits a much greater multitude of personages worthy of being proposed as models of virtue, than could ever be afforded by the ancient Greeks and Romans. Hence, Modern History, though generally little known, should be considered as peculiarly im- portant and useful: not indeed, as we find it in the works of many recent authors, such as Hume, Gibbon, and others, whoso partiality, prejudice, or oven irreligion, appears in almost every page of their works; but, as it ought to bo presented to the reader, in a spirit of candor and impartiality, after a sincere and diligent research on the part of the writer. The present course includes all the time which has elapsed from the coming of Chirst, and even from the battle of Actium (b. c. 31,) to the age in which we live. Although a shorter duration than this is commonly, though arbitrarily, assigned to Modern History, we have thought proper to refer its beginning to the memorable epoch which is termed in the Scripture the fulness oj times, (Ephes. i. 10,) and which nearly coincides with the change of the Roman Re- public into an Empire after the battle of Actium. Thus, in reckoning from the dispersion of the sons of Noah, and following the division of Sacred History into two chief parts, the Ancient and the Neio Law, we have a similar and very natural division of the civil history itself into two grand portions, the one before, the other aftei' the coming of Christ; and whilst we take a view of the civilized world during the last eighteen hundred years, we also perceive the connexion •which it had with the Christian Church from her foundation. To treat of each nation separately, is not the object of the present work; we are not writing a collection of particular histories, but a general one ; nor, on the other hand, is it our intention to confine ourselves, as is too frequently done, to a meagre outline of names, dates and facts, without mentioning their neces- sary circumstances ; but, by selecting from the best historians of the different nations, whatever is most im-portant and worthy of notice, to present, as far as possible, a detailed and connected view of the whole. Nothing more can be reasonably expected from an elementary course of this class : if it omits ^o essential fact or circumstance, and, at the same time, does not impede the pro- gress of the narrative by introducing numberless events of secondary impor- tance, surely nothing more can be desired in this respect, either for instruction or amusement. There is no other means of imparting, in an interesting man- ner, a sufficient knowledge of Histoiy. Should any disadvantage occasionally arise from this plan, it will be compensated by synoptical and chronological tables ; and, moreover, facts of an extraordinary nature, or which have been commonly misrepresented in modern publications, will be illustrated by notes placed in the latter part of the volume. PREFACE. V As a conclusion of these preliminary remarks, and an immediate introduction to Modern Historj', some idea must be given of the political disturbances which so long agitated ancient Rome, and terminated in the destruction of the Com- monwealth. The Romans, by their invincible patience and constancy during seven hundred years, had conquered almost the whole of the then known world, viz. Italy, Gaul, Spain, Northern Africa, Egypt, Syria, Asia Minor, Greece, Illyria, etc. But, at the same time, all kinds of vices were introduced. Love of country, and respect for the laws were gradually superseded by luxury, avarice, intrigues, and an almost universal corruption. Public emplojnnents and dignities, the emolu- ments of which had increased, were solicited with extraordinary avidity; ambi- tious candidates sought only to flatter the people; and generals of the same character strained every nerve to gain the troops over to their party, even resort- ing to extravagant promises and. presents, in order to attain their object. Sjdla, having obtained, after his great victories, the- Dictatorship for life, proved to the world that Rome could endure a master; like him, Pompey and Julius CiBsar successively rendered themselves all-powerful. The violent death of the latter, who was slain in the Senate, augmented, instead of lessening the evil. There were now three competitors for the supreme power : Antony, Lepi- dus, and the young Octavius, grand-nephew and adopted son of Ceesar. During their triumvirate, all in Rome who were most remarkable for their courage and their opposition to tyranny, were destroyed: Cicero was put to death; Brutus and Cassius were defeated at Philippi; and with them expired the liberty of the Roman people. Octavius and Antony, having removed the feeVjle Lepidus, made various agree- ments respecting the division of power ; but the young Ceesar, more dexterous than his colleague, always found means to obtain the better share, gained the popular favor in Rome, and rapidly advanced to the sovereign authority. An- tony, in his attempts to repair his losses, engaged in a civil war, which served only to accelerate his utter ruin : his defeat in the battle of Actium, and his death which followed soon after, left Octavius undisputed master. This memorable event, which took place in the year 722 after the building of Rome, and 31 before the coming of Christ, brings us to the beginning of our course of Modern His- tory, which includes eight parts or epochs, in the following order : The first part comprises the time which elapsed from the battle of Actium (b. c. 31,) to the accession of Constantino (a. d. 306;) including 337 years. The 2d from the accession of Constantino (a. d. 306,) to the fall of the Roman Empire in the West (a. d. 476;) 170 years. The 3d from the fall of the Roman Empire in the West (a. d. 476,) to its revival under (Jharlemagne (a. d. 800 ;) 324 years. The 4th from the revival of the Western Empire under Charlemagne (a. d. 800,) to the beginning of the Crusades (a. d. 1095 ;) 295 years. The 5th from the beginning of the Crusades (a. d. 1095,) to their termi- nation (a. d. 1272;) 177 years. The 6th from the end of the Crusades (a. d. 1272,) to the discovery of America (a, d. 1492;) 220 years. The 7th from the discovery of America (a. d. 1492,) to the Treaty of Ver- sailles, or Paris, in which the Independence of the United States was solemnly and universally acknowledged (a. d. 1783 ;) 291 years. The 8th from the Treaty of Paris (a. d. 1783,) to A. D. 1867 ; .• 84 years. Baltimore, Septernber, 1854. CONTENTS. PART I. FROM THE BATTLE OF ACTIUM (B. C. 31), TO THE ACCESSION OF CONSTANTINE (A. D. 306). Roman Empire, Augustus, Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, Nero, Galba— Otho— Vitellius, , Vespasian, , Titus, Domitian, Nerva — Trajan, Adiian, , Antoninus Pius, Marcus Aurelius, Commodus — Pertinax — Didius Julianus, Page 13 ib. 23 33 35 38 44 48 54 56 59 61 65 , 68 , 69 Page Septimius Severus, 70 C ar ac al 1 a — M aci inus— Helioga- balus, 77 Alexander Severus, 78 Military Usurpers, 83 Claudius II, 85 Aurelian, 87 Interregnum — Tacitus, 90 Probus, ib Carus, and his two sons Cari- nus and Nuraerian, 92 Diocletian and Maximian; af- terwards Constantius Chlorus and Galerius, ib. PART II. FROM THE ACCESSION OF CONSTANTINE (A. D. 306), TO THE DOWNFALL OF THE ROMAN IN THE WEST (A. D. 476). Page Page Constantine the Great, 98 Honorius and Arcadms, 123 Constantius, and his brothers Valentinian III, in the West; Constantine II and Constans, 107 in the East, Theodosius II, Julian, 109 or the Younger, 126 Jovian, 113 Marcian — Leothe Thracian, in Valentinian and Valens, 114 the East — Last period and Theodosius the Great — Gratian fall of tlie Western Empire, 131 and Valentinian II, 116 Vlll CONTENTS. PART III. FROM THE DOWNFALL OF THE WESTERN EMPIRE (A. D. 476), TO ITS REVIVAL UNDER CHARLEMAGNE (A. D. 8tf0) Foundation of the principal and most celebrated States of Eu- rope, 135 An2:lo- Saxons in Great Britain- Hengist, ib. Visigoths in Spain — Evaric, . . . 136 Franks in Gaul — Clovis, 138 Ostrogoths in Italy — Theodoric the Great, 140 Emperors of Constantinople,.. 142 Justin I,. ib. Glorious reign of Justinian, 144 Justin II— Tiberius II, 153 Mauritius, 157 Phocas,. 161 Heraclius, 162 Rise of Mahometanism, 164 Progress of Mahometanism,, . . 167 Conquests of the Saracens in Syria, Palestine and Mesopo- tamia, ib. Pag« Conquests of the Saracens in Egypt 169 in Persia, Rho. 14. AUGUSTUS. 21 The intimacy of their friendship reflects equal honor on both. Agrippa obtained the favor of Augustus without mean condescen- sion and flattery; and Augustus, without cither distrust or jealousy of A grippa'vS conspicuous merit, raised him almost to an equality with himself. After the death of so faithful a friend, he honored his remains by magnificent obsequies, at which he himself pro- nounced the funeral oration, and would not suffer him to be laid in any other tomb than that destined for himself. Maecenas too, although indolent with regard to his own affairs and person, was an able minister, who joined a superior mind to beneficence and modesty. He always endeavored to procure the advantage of others, and on the contrary never availed himself of the emperor's friendship to promote his own interest. To him and and 10 his constant protection were science and literature princi- pally indebted for the high degree of perfection, which they at- tained under the reign of Augustus. Drusus, as we have already said, conquered a great part of Ger- many. As a Roman, no one surpassed him in noble and generous feelings ; as a general, he was equalled, in that age, only by Agrippa and by his own son Germanicus. In fine, Marcellus, a young prince possessed of uncommon talents, and still more admirable for his moral virtues, was, m every re- spect, deserving of his high rank and fortune. lie had already ac- quired general esteem ; he was the hope of the Romans and the pride of his uncle Augustus, when death exhibited in his person a new instance of the frailty of human grandeur. This made Virgil say in the 6th book of his -i3j]neid : " This youth, the blissful vision of a day, Shall be just shown on earth, and snatched away." — Dryden* And again, after alluding to the great hero of the same name, con- spicuous in the second Punic war : Ah ! couldst thou break through fate's severe decree, A new Marcellus would arise in thee."t These beautiful verses, when first publicly recited, drew tears from all who heard them, and particularly touched Augustus and his sister Octavia, the young princes' mother, who remained inconsol- able till death. Thus the emperor was compelled to centre, if not all his affection, at least all his expectation in Tiberius, lie now chose hira for his * Ostendent terris hunc tantum fata, neque ultra Esse sinent. t Heu, raiserande puer! si qua fata aspera rumpas, Tu Marcellus eris. 22 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. colleague and successor, as the only one whom he knew truly capa- ble of upholding the empire. He himself, however, did not entirely withdraw from the cares of the government, a burden always agreeable to his ambition. Even, when his health was decUning, his mind continued ever busy and active. At length, whilst travelhng through the south of Italy, on his way from Beneventum to Rome, he fell dangerously ill, and could not proceed beyond Nola in Campania. When he saw that the end of his life was near, he ordered a looking- glass to be brought to him, and his hair to be dressed ; then called in his friends, and asked them if they thought he had well played his part in the drama of Hfe. Being answered in the affirmative, he cried out in a Greek verse with which the ancient plays generally termi- nated : " Give me then your applause." Thus, at the age of seventy- six, after reigning forty-five years, he expired on the 19th of August, a month formerly called Sextilis, but to which he had given his name. He was buried at Rome with great pomp, and even divine honors were impiously paid to his memory. Augustus possessed, in an eminent degree, all the qualifications necessary to become the founder of the Roman empire under its present form ; viz. penetrating genius, energy of soul, activity, and above all, a consummate prudence under all possible circumstances. His long administration may be proposed, in most points, as a model of excellent government ; and he himself might be looked upon as one of the best of princes, could we forget that the mild and beneficent Augustus had once been the fierce and cruel Ocfavius. Hence, the common opinion entertained respecting his public character is, that it would have conduced greatly to the happiness of mankind, if Octavius had never been born, or if Augustus had never died. The census of the Roman citizens was taken several times under his reign. In the beginning, they amounted to four milhons and sixty- three thousand; towards the end, to four milhons one hundred and thirty-seven thousand, and shortly after, under the emperor Claudius they were found to be nearly seven millions. These numbers com- prised, very probably, not only the inhabitants of Rome, but all per- sons in every part of the empire who had obtained by birth or by special privilege, the right of Roman citizenship,* such as was pos- sessed by St. Paul, a Jew and a native of Tarsus in Cilicia.f To ascertain precisely the population of the city of Rome at that epoch, seems quite impossible ; but from a variety of circumstances, it may be reasonably supposed to have amounted to about two millions. * See Tillemont Histoire des Empereitrs, vol. \,p. 4, 48, 244. t Act. Jvp. XXI 39; and xxri. 25, 26, 27, 2S. A. I>. 14 — 37.1 TIBERIUS. 23 TIBERIUS. A. D. 14—37. Immediately after the death of Augustus, Tiberius, who had now completed his fifty-fifth year, assumed all the marks of the imperial dignity. He was the son of the empress Livia, by a former mar- riage with Tiberms Nero. His mother, indeed, by her credit and in- fluence, gready contriButed to his elevation, but it was perhaps owing chiefly to his own military and political talents; and these would certainly have fitted him for his high station, had he not chosen to act the part of a vicious and tyrannical prince. Shortly after his accession to the throne, Tiberius began to manifest the perverse inclinations of his heart. Naturally morose and cruel, jealous of any glory acquired by others, he was full of dissimulation, and the more to be dreaded, as he knew how to conceal his anger. It sometimes happened that, whilst he was pohtely entertaining indivi- duals in his palace, sentence of death was pronounced against them, by his orders, in the public tribunals of Rome. The most trifling faults in matters regarding his government, were visited with the penalties of high-treason. With such a prince it was dangerous to jest. As he had postponed the payment of some legacies bequeathed by Augustus to the Roman people, a wag, who wished to remind him of his obligation, took ad- vantage of a funeral that was passing along the street, approachetl the bier, and feigning to whisper something in the ear of the dead man, said, in a tone loud enough to be heard by the by-standers : "Pray, remember to tell Augustus that his legacies are not yet paid." The emperor, being informed of this piece of wit, sent for the unfortunate jester, paid him his portion of the legacy, and ordered him to be put to death immediately, saying: "Let him go himself to Augustus, and he will be able to bring him later and better news than that carried by the dead man." The jest however had its desired effect, and the legacies were shortly after paid to the people. Notwithstanding the vices and tyranny of Tiberius, his reign was not altogether inglorious. At home, it exhibited many acts of justice, firmness and munificence; and it was marked abroad by many suc- cessful events, the honor of which belongs partly to Drusus, his son, but chiefly to Germanicus, his nephew, son of the former Drusus. On the reception of the first news of the late emperor's death, the legions stationed both in Pannonia and Germany for the defence of these countries, openly revolted, demanding from their leaders, with alarming threats, an increase of their pay and an earlier discharge from military service. Drusus and other persons of high rank, with a few cohortSi, were dispatched to quell the insurrection in Pannonia. 24 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. On their arrival, they found every thing in dreadful confusion, which ■neither the presence of Drusus, nor the reading of his father^s letters, was able to remove. He, on the contrary, had the mortification to see his guards and' counsellors exposed to the violence of the soldiery, and himself to insulting cries and clamors. The following night seemed to threaten the perpetration of still greater crimes, when, in a clear and serene sky, the moon was beheld suddenly, though gradually, losing its brightness. The overawed soldiers, unacquainted with the cause of the eclipse, considered it as a token of the wrath of Heaven, and of the frightful punishment which awaited their disobedience.* Drusus and his council skilfully availed themselves of this favorable circumstance, and, ordering the leaders of the rebels to be arrested, had them executed on the spot. After this, most of the soldiers speedily returned to the strict rule of military discipline; the three legions were then separated without much trouble, and sent to distant quarters ; by which measure, the few remaining sparks of rebellion were easily ex- tinguished. Drusus, having thus re-established good order, and deeming his presence no longer necessary, set out for Rome. Germanicus, who held the command in Germany, had many more difficulties to encounter in staying the revolt of his numerous troops. It was only by extraordinary exertions, by subjecting himself to every hardship and even endangering his life, by opportunely exercisirvg severity and lenity, that he was enabled to revive discipline and re- gularity among the legions both of the Upper and Lower Rhine. Passing then from one extreme to the other, the soldiers despatched with their swords all who had been foremost in the rebellion; and afterwards, in order to exercise their valor more properly, they asked to be led against the barbarians. Germanicus readily complied with their desire. He threw a bridge over the Rhine, advanced into the hostile country with a numerous troop of chosen men taken from the legi/Dns and the allies, and suddenly attacking the Germans, made a great slaughter of them, whereas, among the Romans, not one sol dier was wounded. An account of this disaster soon reached several of the neighbor- ing tribes. Inflamed with resentment, they took up arms, and post- ing themselves to advantage, surrounded the woods through which the victors were to pass in returning to their camp. After skirmish- ing with the front and the flanks of the army, they fell with their whole strength upon the rear. The light cohorts of the auxiliary troops found themselves unable to sustain the shock, and began to * Noctem rninacom. et in scehis eniptiiram fors lenivit: nam luna claro repentfe caelo visa lano;nescere. Id miles rationis ignarus omen prjpscntitira accepit sibi laborem asternum portend), etc. — Taciivs, ^^n/ial. lib 1, W. XXVIII. A. D. 14 — 37.] TIBERIUS. 25 be thrown into confusion; when Germanicus, riding at full speed to one of the legions, cried aloud that the time was now come for them to efface, by a noble exploit, the guilt of the late revolt; **Let them charge with courage, and gain immortal honor." Animated by these words, the legion rushed to the attack, and at the first onset, broke the ranks of the enemy. The barbarians fled to the open plain, where the Romans pursued them with dreadful carnage; from that time^ the march was unmolested, and the soldiers went into winter quarters. Tiberius received the intelligence of these events with mingled pleasure and anxiety. That the sedition was at an end, was to him a source of satisfaction ; but he feared that the success of Germani- cus would inspire him with the idea of claiming the throne for him- self. -This was a groundless suspicion; the young prince, by refusing at the lime of the revolt, the empire proffered to him by the muti- nied legions, had just given an incontrovertible proof of his constant fidelity. Still nothing could diminish the secret envy of Tiberius, and he only waited for some opportunity, or rather sought some pre- tence, to recall his nephew to Rome. In the mean time, Germanicus had matured his plan of opera- tions for the ensuing summer. He opened the campaign by a sud- den and successful irruption into the territories near the Rhine. After this, he prepared to march against the main forces of the enemy, then assembled under the command of the same Arminius who had, six years before, obtained a memorable victory over the Romans. Four legions and the cavalry proceeded by land; Germanicus with four other legions embarked on the German Sea, the more easily to reach the mouth of the river Amisia (the Ems). All arrived in due time at the place of destination, and the whole army marched to- wards the forest where the bones of Varus and his legions were said to lie unburied. As the Romans were advancing, an awful spectacle met their view and excited in every breast feelings of horror. They saw the ground white with bones, in some places thinly scattered, in others lying in heaps, as the unfortunate soldiers of Varus happened to fall in flight, or in a body resisted to the last. Fragments of javelins and the limbs of horses lay scattered about the fields; human skulls were seen upon the trunks of trees ; in the adjacent woods stood the blood- stained altars on which the tribunes and principal centurions had been offered up in sacrifice : and near the decaying intrenchmenta of the Roman camp, was the spot where some, who at first escaped the general massacre, were supposed to have made their last effort, and perished in the attempt. All were affected at this mournful sight, and with hearts oppressed 3 26 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. with grief, buried the remains of their slaughtered countrymen. This duty performed, they pressed forward in pursuit of an enemy whom it was not less difficult to overtake than to conquer : at length, Ger- manicus deeming the opportunity favorable, ordered his cavalry to begin the attack. But Arminius, taking advantage of the denies and other difficult parts of the country, feigned a retreat to the forest; then suddenly wheeling about, he gave the signal to the troops that lay in ambush in the woods, to rush out against the Romans. The cavalry which had been advancing, and the auxiliary cohorts destined to support it, struck with surprise, were put to flight, and might have been entirely defeated, had not Germanicus come up with the legions in order of battle, and checked the career of the enemy. The armies parted upon equal terms, and retired to winter quarters, not however without the loss of -many brave men on the side of the Romans; whilst the survivors were exposed to innumerable hardships, which they overcame only by their fortitude and patience. In all this variety of events, Germanicus invariably displayed the greatest personal courage, extraordinary prudence, and a constant solicitude for the welfare of his troops. His ability in improving every advantage and every occasion of success, was particularly re- markable. When the Germans were to be attacked and driven from same post, he took upon himself the most arduous part of the at- tempt, leaving the easiest duties to his lieutenants, and yet attributing afterwards to their conduct so much of the success, that three of them, Silius, Apronius and Cecina, obtained triumphal honors. He looked upon the soldiers as his children, and treated them with truly paternal kindness. He never us 'lessly exposed them to dan- gers, nor fought any battle, except when almost certain that he would obtain a considerable advantage. After an engagement, he visited the wounded, consoled them by placing before them the glory of the past and the hope of the future, supplied their wants, and with his own money indemnified those who had suffered any loss in the campaign. So many virtues and amiable qualities greatly endeared Germanicus to his troops, whilst his valor and sldll made him formidable to the enemy. The only fault perhaps in his conduct, was the unrelenting and inhu- man rigor with which he carried on the war against the Germans, spreading slaughter far and wide, and laying the whole country waste with fire and sword, without regard to age or sex.* What has already been said of the Germanic war, belongs to the years 14 and 15 of our Lord. To ensure the success of the next campaign, Germanicus determined to have all his troops conveyed by water into the heart of the enemy's country ; by his orders, a • Tacit. Jlnnal. lib. I, n. li, lvi; and lib. II, n. xxv. \ A. D. 14. — 37.] TIBERIUS. 27 fleet consisting of a thousand vessels was fitted out for the intended expedition. They sailed from the eastern channel of the Rhine, pro- ceeded over the lakes, and entering the German Ocean, navigated as far as the river Amisia. There the men disembarked, and the ships were left safe at their moorings. The Romans advanced through the plain, crossed the Visurgis (Weser), and attacked the Germans, who were encamped on the right bank of that river. At the signal given by Germanicus, the infantry began the assault in front; the cavalry, at the same time, charged the flank and rear; both attacks were made with so much vigor, that the barbarians, not- withstanding their natural bravery, were thrown into confusion and driven from all their posts. Yet Arminius performed wonders ; by his voice, by signs, by every means in his power, still endeavoring to sustain the combat. Wounded as he was, and nearly surrounded, he braved every danger, and at length by vigorous exertions, escaped from the field, having previously besmeared his face with his own blood, in order to disguise his person. The enemies were now completely routed. The victory cost the Romans little or no eflTusion of blood : but the country, ten miles round, was covered with mangled bodies and the arms of the van- quished. Among the spoils was found a large quantity of fetters, which the Germans, in the anticipation of victory, had destined for the Roman prisoners. The legions, on the field of battle, again pro- claimed Tiberius emperor, and having raised a mound, placed on the top of it a pile of German arms, trophies of their victory, with an an inscription at the base setting forth the names of the conquered nations. To the Germans nothing could be so exasperating as this monu- ment of Roman glory. Inflamed anew with the desire of revenge, they raised fresh troops, and once more resolved to try the hazard of a bat- tle. Their martial spirit was not less than that of the Romans : still, after a fierce and obstinate combat, they were again defeated, and many of them, seeing that further resistance would be fruitless, surrendered at discretion. The summer being now far advanced, Germanicus ordered some of the legions to return by land to winter quarters; he himself sailed with the rest down the river Amisia to the Ocean. The weather was favor- able, and the sea presented no other roughness on its surface, tnan that occasioned by the stroke of the oars and the rapid motion of a thous- and vessels. But this calm was of short duration. The sky became overcast; a storm of hail burst upon them v/ith sudden fury ; squalls of wind drove the billows in different directions; and the pilot no longer knew what course to steer. Horses, arms and baggage were thrown overboard in order to lighten the ships; siill many of them were 28 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. either sunk, or wrecked on distant islands, where the soldiers perished by famine or lived only upon the carcasses of horses cast by the sea upon the beach. At length the storm abated, and the remainmg vessels successfully reached the land. Germanicus, almost driven to despair, took every possible care to gather and comfort his troops, and furnish them with new arms and clothes. Having refitted the Heet, he sent ships to the islands scattered through the German Sea, in search of the soldiers who had been cast away : by these timely efforts most of them were saved. The news of these disasters spreading abroad, the Germans thought of renewing the war; but Germanicus was not slow in counteracting their designs : two or three parties of Roman troops very soon proved to them the frailty of their hopes. According to the account given by tlie prisoners, there never was seen among the barbarians more general consternation : they were now forced to confess that the Romans rose superior to adversity, a nation of heroes not to be in any way subdued; and no doubt remained that another summer would terminate the war. But, Tiberius could no longer brook the idea that Germanicus should acquire so much glory in the command of armies, and he ar- dendy desired his return. All his letters were to that effect. In them, he remarked that it would be much more expedient to abandon the Germans to their own dissensions, and that it was now high time for their conqueror to return, and enjoy in the capital the glorious rest due to his protracted labors. Germanicus obeyed, though with reluc- tance. His entrance into the city exhibited a magnificent spectacle; and, that nothing might be wanting to the splendor of the occasion, Tiberius ordered money to be distributed among the- people and the soldiers, in the name of the young prince. He moreover appointed him his colleague in the consulship for the ensuing year; but these marks of good will, though specious, were by no one thought sincere. It is true, however, that what he had foreseen with regard to the termination of the war, really happened. The different nations of Germany, no longer dreading a foreign power, began, according to the custom of barbarians, to quarrel among themselves. Various bat- tles were fought, in which Arminius, at the head of his countrymen^ the Cheruscans, maintained his former glory, and gave to the powei of the Marcoman king Maroboduus, a fatal blow from which this prince never recovered. About the same time, letters were received at Rome from another German chieftain, in which he proposed to de- spatch Arminius, provided poison should be sent well prepared for that effect. These letters were read in the senate ; but the proposal wa» magnanimously rejected, and, in imitation of the noble conduct of ancient generals in similar circumstances, Tiberius answered the Gei- T A." D. 14 — 37.] TIBERIUS. 29 mail prince ihat it was not by poison and fraud, but by steel and open force that the Romans were accustomed to subdue their enemies. Nevertheless, Arminius did not long survive. When he saw the Roman troops withdrawn from the German territories, and Maroboduus his chief rival fallen, he had the ambition to aim at the sovereign power. The independent spirit of his countrymen turned many of them against him: Arminius fought with various success, and fell at last by che treachery of his own relations; "A man," says Tacitus, "un- doubtedly to be considered as the deliverer of Germany, and with far more honor than generals and kings of former days, as he had not merely to cope with Rome in her infancy, but to struggle against her, now that she had grown into a flourishing and powerful empire. He at- tacked the Romans in the height of their glory, and in his efforts against them, was sometimes victorious, often defeated, yet, in the issue of the war, still unconquered."* He lived only thirty seven years, during twelve of which he commanded the Germanic league; leaving after him a renown very great indeed, but tarnished by his attempt to wrest from his countrymen that liberty which he and they had so long and so gloriously defended. The death of Arminius lulled the emperor's apprehensions with respect to the Germans, who having lost their hero, did not for a long time excite any dangerous disturbance, but were contented with the peace which the Romans suffered them to enjoy. This was the great object which Tiberius had ardently wished for : he desired nothing so much as to prevent troubles and maintain tranquillity in the empire. Hence, whilst he exercised his tyranny in Rome, Italy and the pro- vinces had comparatively little to suffer under his goverment. On many occasions, he manifested great zeal for the due administration of justice, and although addicted to many gross vices, endeavored to stem the torrent of general coruption. Acting up to his own maxim, tnat the sheep must be sheared, not Jiayed, he took great cave that the subjects of the empire should not be oppressed by excessive taxes, and Avas attentive to afford speedy assistance to those who experienced unavoidable misfortunes. Thus, when many parts of Asia Minor were laid waste by a tre- mendous earthquake which destroyed in one night twelve celebrated cities (a. d. 17), the liberality of the emperor was an abundant source of relief to the surviving inhabitants. He granted them a remission of alJ tribute for five years, and sums of money proportionate to their losses. By this generosity, Tiberius gained great encomiums, and the cities oi Asia, to perpetuate its remembrance, struck medals — some of which are yet extant. A few years after, all that quarter of the capital on * Tacit. AnnaL lib. II, n. lxxxviii 30 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. Mount Ccelius was destroyed by a conflagration; Tiberius, without waiting to be solicited and petitioned, and without any partiahty for the rank of the sufferers, equally indemnified all those whose houses had been burnt; such as had no friend or protector at court, were sent for, and received the sums necessary to rebuild their dwellings. At an- other tiniej he gave a hundred millions of sesterces (about three mil- lions of dollars), to repair the losses occasioned by a similar accident. Tliese acts of generosity were the more to his honor, as he was very modest in his own buildings. In fine, there was another kind of public calamity that claimed and d re av forth his munificence: the practice of exacting heavy interests, and the want of a good currency, having caused scenes of great distress among the people, he procured a con- siderable fund to be lent out of the imperial treasury, without interest, for three years, on condition that the borrower, for the security of the exchequer, should give a mortgage on lands of double the value. By that seasonable aid pubhc credit was revived. These various examples plainly show, that Tiberius was not so regardless of the miseries of his subjects as some writers assert. Yet, notwithstanding these generous acts, it must be confessed that his character was really perverse and cruel. From his very youth, these defects had appeared; so much so, that his tutor declared him to be a lump of clay moistened with blood. Hence Rome and the patrician families had much to dread and suffer from his suspicious policy : it vras even a misfortune to be nearly related to him, and a, great part his own family became the unhappy victims of his cruel and jealous temper. Germanicus, after his triumph, was sent to Asia with great pow- ers from the emperor and the senate, to settle some important busi- ness, and tranquilHze many of the provinces in which considerable disturbances had lately been excited. He faithfully executed his commission, and conferred upon those countries innumerable bene- fits, with a courteous dignity which enhanced their value. Every where, his noble and generous conduct attracted equally the praises and the affections of the people. But Cneius Piso, a proud and violent man, had been at the same time appointed by Tiberius governor of Syria, with se'?ret orders, as it was believed, to annoy, oppose and counteract Germanicus in every thing : a commission Avhich, whether given ot feigned, was too faithfully performed. For a long time the young prince bore with patience and moderation the aff*ronts and injuries heaped on him by his vile persecutor, and even treated him with generosity; then an open rupture followed, shortly after which Germanicus fell sick and died at Antioch, under the impression that he had been poisoned by Piso and his consort Plancina. A. D. 14—37.] TIBERIUS. 81 Intense was the grief occasioned throughout the empire by the death of Gerinanicus. When his disconsolate widow Agrippina carried back in an urn the ashes of her husband, she found the roads covered with people whose tears and sighs told her how deeply they shared in her affliction. But it would be difficult to describe the sorrow evinced in the capital; the day on which the remains of the prince were deposited in the tomb of Augustus, was one ol inexpressible mourning. Tiberius himself manifested exteriorly a grief in which his heart probably had no share, and was obliged to abandon Piso to the public indignation. This unhappy man was not, it is true, convicted of the crime laid to his charge; but he had com- mitted other crimes deserving the severity of the law. Piso per- ceived his danger: before the trial was concluded, he Avas found dead in his chamber, with his throat cut, and a sword lying near him on the floor; but whether he had committed suicide, or had been killed by others for fear of what he might disclose, was left uncertain. The other enemies of Germanicus met with little severity; on the oontrary, his family supplied new victims to the insatiable hatred of Tiberius. So far did the cruelty of the emperor extend, that he caused Agrippina and her two eldest sons to perish by ill-treatment and starvation. Having a real affection for no one but himself, he bore with a firmness bordering on insensibility, the death of his own son Drusus, who had been poisoned by the commander of the praB- torian (imperial) guards. This commander was a certain ^lius Sejanus, who, gaining the favor of Tiberius, rose from the rank of a simple knight to that of his chief minister. New honors were daily conferred upon him, and m a short time his power was not far inferior to that of Tiberius himself. Not satisfied with this success, he conceived the daring design of opening his way to the throne by the extermination of the imperial family. After Drusus and the sons of Germanicus were removed, he prevailed upon the emperor to retire from Rome for the sake of greater tranquillity, and to intrust the reigns of governmeni to him, his tried and faithful minister. But whilst Sejanus, thus far fcuccessful, was revolving in his mind the last step for the accom- plishment of his designs, his treason was detected; and Tiberius having, by a message, informed the senate of the whole affair, sen- tence of death was pronounced against the traitor and executed without delay. Most of the friends and relations of Sejanus were involved in his ruin. Whilst these painful transactions took place in Rome, Judea Was the theatre of most interesting events. For more than three years, our Lord favored it with the public spe'-tacle of his heavenly virtues and the preaching of his> Gospel, which he confirmed by many mi- 32 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. racles; and fina.ly,by his passion and death, he completed the great work o.'' the redemption of mankind (a. d. 33). Three days after, ne rose glorious from the dead; frequently appeared to his disciples, giving them, during forty days, various necessary instructions about the establishment and government of his Church; committed to St. Peter the care of his flock;* commissioned him and the other Apos- tles to go and teach all nations, with the positive promise of his daily assistance till the end of the world;t and thea ascended into hea- ven in their presence. After ten days, the Apostles being all assembled in Jerusalem, the Holy Ghost came down upon them in a visible manner. They im- mediately began to preach with astonishing success. The first two discourses of St. Peter converted eight thousand Jews: many more afterwards became converts; so that, even before the close of Tibe- rius' reign, a numerous Church was already established in Jerusa- lem, whence the light of the Gospel began to diffuse itself in every direction and in every part of the world. These are the only consohng objects which present themselves to our view in the midst of a deluge of crimes; for no age was ever more corrupted. Tiberius, above all, without ceasing to pay some attention to the public weal, every day gave fuller scope to his un- ruly passions, and to his tyrannical cruelties against the first families of the empire. Informations, trials and executions were multiplied, and the most illustrious personages in Rome gradually disappeared, unhappy objects of the hatred of a suspicious and sanguinary prince. Nothing can be imagined more degrading to humanity, than the scenes which marked the last years of his life. No less odious to himself than to others, he retired into the small and at that time delightful island of Caprea, a name which no one ever after remem- bered and pronounced without horror. There he abandoned him- self, for several years, to all the excesses of the most profligate pas- sions, his cruelties always keeping pace with his debaucheries. At length his constitution was broken, and his strength began to fail. In the hope of finding a more salubrious situation, he left the island o\ Caprea, and went over to the continent, where, falling very sick at Misenum, a promontory near Naples, he was, on the 16th of March (a. d. 37), seized with a fainting fit, during which many thought him dead. He however recovered his senses: but Macro, the com- mander of the pra'torian guard, who had already paid his homage to the presumed successor, gave orders that the old emperor should be smothered with pillows. Thus, in his seventy-eighth year, and * John xxi. 16. 17. \ Matth. xxviii. 19 20. A. D. 37 — il.] CALIGULA. 33 the rvventy third of his reign, Tiherius perished by fhe perHdy of hii own friends; a treatment of which he himself had been so fr© quently guilty. He did not reach at once the height of wickedness which has justly caused his memory to be held in detestation : Tacitus well observes a striking gradation in his course of vice ana lyrauny, and accurately defines its different stages. "Tiberius," says he, "was much es- teemed whilst a private man, and as long as he held offices under Augustus. He was artful in feigning virtue, in the beginning of his own reign, until the death of Germanicus and Drusus; his actions were a mixture of good and evil, during the life time of his mother Li- via; detestably cruel, but secret in his debaucheries, while he loved or feared Sejanus; lastly, he abandoned himself to every sort of profli- gacy, when, freed from all the restraints of fear and shame, he knew and followed no other guide than the bent of his abominable incli- nations."* Phaedrus, the celebrated fabulist, and duintus-Curtius, the elegant historian of Alexander, lived under Tiberius; the poets Persius and Lucan flourished shortly after. CALIGULA.— A. D. 37— 4i. One of the sons of Germanicus, not only had escaped the ruin m which the rest of his family were involved, but even constantly en- joyed the favor of Tiberius, and became his adopted son. This was Caius, better known by the name of Caligula (from Caliga, a sort of military hoot which he had been accustomed to wear, whilst yet a child, m the camp of his father). He succeeded the late emperor without opposition, and even to the great satisfaction of the whole empire ; indeed he seemed at first, by several acts of clemency and beneficence, to deserve this mark of public esteem. He restored many privileges to the people ; delivered innocent and calumniated persons from prison and banishment ; abolished arbitrary prosecutions for crimes o) state; and evinced so good intentions, that he received from the senate the most flattering honors. But the joy of the Romans was not of long duration, and their hopes of a prosperous government were cruelly deceived. Caligula was taken dangerously ill, and after his recovery, either because he was unwilling any longer to restrain his passions, or because his intellect had been impaired by the violence of the disease, he began • Tacit. Arnal. lib.Yl. n. hvi. 34 MODERN niSTORY. [PART -1 to act like a madman, and indulged in every species of injustice, cru- elty and lit' n na:snes> He commenced his exiravaganl career by spending, in games and foolish enlerlainmenis, two billions five hundred millions of sesterces (about sixty-three millions of dollars), in less than one year; aod when the public treasury was drained, he had recourse to the most frightful extortions. Daily confiscations, oppressive taxes, rapine, plunder and murder of the wealthiest citizens, were the means to which Caligula resorted, in order to gather heaps of gold and silver for the indulgence of his uninterrupted extravagance. On one occasion, being at play, he happened to want money. He sent for the public register which contained the names of the property-holders, condemned a certain number of them to death, and said, with a smile, to those with whom he was playing: *' How unlucky you are! It has taken you a long time to win a small sum, and in one moment I have won six hundred milions of sesterces (fifteen miUions of dollars)." In barbarity Caligula was never surpassed. He wished that the Roman people had but one head, that it might be struck off at a blow. This bfing impossible, he at least caused many persons to be massa- cred by his soldiers, or thrown into the arena, there to be devoured by wild beasts, their tongues having been previously cut out, to prevent them from complaining. He forced others to kill themselves, among the rest young Tiberius his cousin, and grand-son of the late emperor. Neither rank nor age was exempt from his fury. At a repast with the two consuls, he suddenly burst into a loud laugh : the consuls hav- ing respectfully entreated him to acquaint them with the cause of his Rxtraordinary joy ; " I was thinking," he replied, " that it requires but a sign from me, to have both of you killed in an instant." It was his pleasure to see the victims of his monstrous cruelty suffer excru- ciating torments; his delight to make them feel death, and behold their blood flowing and their limbs scattered. The more ferocious and barbarous he was towards men, the more kind and feehng he was towards beasts. He honored his horse, called Incilatus, in every manner he could imagine: he gave him a palace, with guards, servants, a cook, and such other attendants as the happy animal might require in order to entertain his guests wiih due solemnity. He invited him to his own table, at which he gave him gilded barley to eat, and wine to drink in golden cups. Incitatua was clothed in purple, wore a collar of pearls, and the night before he had to run in the race, sentinels were placed around his palace, to prevent the least noise that might disturb his repose. In fine, Caligula was accustomed to swear by his horse, and he would have appointed bim consul, had he not been prevented by death. His military exploits were not less extravagant. In addition to A. D. 41—54.] CLAUDIUS. 35 the armies stationed in various parts of the empire, he raised new troops, and went with them and a band of comedians, buffoons, and gladiators, to join the old legions encamped on the banks of the Rhine. Here he found himself at the head of nearly two hundred and fifty thousand men. As the Germans scorned to fight against such a general ; that he might not leave the frontier without some semblance of victory, he contrived a scheme in perfect accordance with his character. A detachment of his own troops was sent to the other side of the Rhine, with secret orders to conceal themselves in a wood. Then Caligula, crossing over at the head of the legions, marched against them; the pretended enemy was easily routed,' and the emperor returned crowned with laurels. His courage impelled him afterwards to go to the sea-coast facing Great Britain. As soon as he arrived, he drew up the legions along the shore, and having gone up a short distance in the imperial galley, returned in great haste and gave the signal for battle. The soldiers, with surprise, asked who was their enemy ; when Caligula informed them that the enemy was the ocean just conquered by him in their presence, and that they had nothing else to do than collect the shells thrown on the shore, as trophies of this great victory. The better to perpetuate the remembrance of so glorious an event, he laid the foun- dation of a lofty tower, and set out for Rome, in order to give himsell the honors of a triumph. To fill up the measure of his absurdities, he even arrogated to him self divine honors. He had a temple erected to his name, and a statue to which sacrifices were offered. Of the order of sacrificators insti- tuted for this purpose, the principal members were his uncle Claudius, his wife, his horse, and himself. At last it entered into the mind of Caligula that the Jews were a most unhappy people in not acknowledging him as a god; he there- fore resolved to have his statue placed and adored in the temple of Jerusalem. But before he could execute his design, a violent death closed his career of crime and impiety. Cherea, a tribune of the pre- rorian guards, stabbed him in the middle of Rome, after he had reigned four, and lived twenty-nine years (a. d. 41). His name is every Bvnere recorded as that of the worst of men and a monster of cruelty. CLAUDIUS.— A. D. 41—54. On the assassination of Caligula, dreadful confusion followed in Rome. It was the wish of the senate to re-establish the common- 36 MODEEN HISTORY. [PART 1. wealth; but the prsetorians proclaimed Claudius emperor, and the senators were compelled to submit. This Claudius was the brother of Germanicus, and uncle of Cah guia J a man of so weak an intellect and such unconquerable timidity, that his mother Antonia, when she met with any silly person, was accustomed to say: "He is as great a fool as my son Claudius." Such a man was assuredly more in need of being governed, thai) quahtied to govern others; yet, for the greater humiliation of heathen Rome, Almighty God permitted him to hold the sceptre during thir teen years. The most important event of his reign was an invasion of Great Britain, which reduced a considerable part of that country to the Ro- man power. Hitherto, the Britons had retained their original inde- pendence; but at the instigation of Beric, a British chieftain whom domestic factions had driven from his native land, the emperor com^ manded Aulus Piautius to undertake the conquest with four legions and their auxiliaries. It was with great difficulty ihat the troops were induced to engage in the attempt, and go to another world ; for such they considered Great Britain : at length they followed their general, crossed the channel, and landed, as it appears, in the county of Kent. The natives, notwithstanding their fright at the first appearance of the invaders, made a gallant resistance; but, overpowered by the well-disciplined troops of the Romans, they soon began to give way and Piautius, pursuing his advantage, arrived at the mouth of the Thames. No sooner was Claudius informed of the success of his lieutenant, than he set out to take the command in person. He did not, however, stay more than sixteen days in the island : after receiv- mg the submission of the natives in the vicinity, he returned to Rome, where he enjoyed the honors of a magnificent triumph. The war nevertheless was not yet ended, Piautius, who was left behind with a powerful army, spent four years more in extending and securing his conquests. Vespasian, an officer whose merit af- terwards raised him to the throne, greatly distinguished himself in that expedition : at the head of a Roman legion and some auxili- aries, he fought thirty battles, took twenty towns, and subdued two of the British nations. Thus, a great part of the country north and south of the Thames, Avas reduced into a Roman province. Five years after the beginning of the war (a. d. 48), Piautius wen 10 receive, in the capital of the empire, the reward of his services and was succeeded in Britain by Ostorius Scapula, Avho not only kept but even enlarged the conquests of his predecessor. Soon after his arrival, he was suddenly attacked by the Britons bordering on the Roman province, who thought that an extraordinary effijrt might rid them of their invaders, at a time when the new general was yet un A. D. 41 — 54.] CLAUDIUS. 37 acquainted wjth their manner of warfare and the rigor of their win- ters. Ostorius, sensible how much the reputation of a commander depends on his first success, immediately marched against them, cut to pieces those who resisted, and dispersed the survivors. A second victory, which in a short time followed the first, gave him a decided superiority over the natives. But, the Silures who lived between the Severn and the Irish Sea, were not so easily subdued. Led on by Caractacus, the greatest warrior in the country, they continued to defend their liberty with undaunted courage. Their army, bv the arrival of many allies, be- came very numerous, and so great was their animosity against the Romans, that Ostorius could not without diflaculty be induced to give them battle. His troops loudly insisting, and crying out that they were sure of victory, Ostorius looked upon their ardor as a happy presage, nor was he deceived in his expectation. No obstacle could successfully oppose the Roman legions. They crossed a river, en- tered the enemy's intrenchments, and amidst a shower of darts, oc- cupied the heights on which their adversaries had posted themselves. The Silures were entirely defeated. The family of Caractacus fell into the hands of the victors, and the chieftain himself, betrayed by his own relations, was delivered in chains to the Roman general. This event was celebrated in Rome with great joy. *' The fame of Caractacus had already crossed the seas; and the natives of Italy were anxious to behold the man who had braved for nine years the power of Rome. As he passed through the imperial city, he ex- pressed his surprise that men who possessed such palaces at home, should deem it worth their while to fight for the wretched hovels of Britain.''* He appeared in the presence of Claudius with charac- teristic magnanimity, and, whilst the other prisoners bewailed with tears their unhappy fate, he behaved and spoke like a hero. The emperor treated him with kindness, and set him and his family at liberty. The other events of the reign of Claudius are little worthy of no- tice. His government was a mixture of good and evil, from the va- riety of good and evil counsels which he received, and according aa he was left to his natural moderation, or controlled by base advisers. in private, he led a contemptible life, and after being infamously dis- honored by Messalina, his first wife, he was poisor.ed by his second wife Agrippina. This Agrippina, the daughter of Germanicus, was a wicked and ambitious princess, who used her utmost endeavors to secure the suc- cession tc the throne for Domitius, her son by a former husband, * Lingara s Hut of Eng. vol. I. a. d. 52. 88 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. Having at length prevailed upon Claudius to adopt Doruitius, and confer on him the title of Caesar, to the exclusion of his own son Britannicus, she soon efiected the object of her wishes, by poisoning the stupid emperor. He died in the 14th year of his reign, the 64th of his hfe, and the 54th of the Christian era. NERO.— A. D. 54—68. The son of Agrippina, on assuming the imperial crown, exchanged nis birth-name Domitius for that of Claudius Nero, the name of his adoptive family. He had enjoyed the benefits of a good education under the philosopher Seneca. While controlled by this wise tutor, and by Burrhus, the commander of his guards, a man of great ta lents and integrity, Nero preserved a show of decency in his pub- Uc conduct. Like Tiberius and Caligula, he commenced his reiga by performing several laudable acts, took great care to have the city plentifully supplied with every thing needful, and gave considerable pensions to poor senators who could not otherwise support their rank and dignhy. On a certain day, when a death-warrant was brought to him to be signed j "I wish," said he, "I had never learned to write." When the senate, on one occasion, had offered him their sincere thanks, he replied: "I shall be happy to receive your thanks, when I truly deserve them." In a word, Nero's actions, in the be- beginning, were characterised by clemency, liberality, kindness, and every thing calculated to win the affections of the people. But his vices could not long brook restraint; his true character appeared in its native deformity, a compound of all that is cruel, in- famous and base. His cruelty first displayed itself in the poisoning of his young brother Britannicus, whose gentle disposition had ex- cited his fears lest he should gain too much upon the favor of the Romans. The poison which perfidious officers administered to the young prince at table, was so violent, that he presently lost the use of his senses, fell upon (he floor, and soon expired ; whilst Nero, who was present, and scarcely eighteen years old, beheld that awful spec- tacle with the steadiness of a tyrant already hardened in crime. This atrocious deed was but a prelude to another still more hei- nous, the murder of his mother Agrippina. He endeavored first to have her drowned in the sea; but, this plan failing, she was, by his command, slain in a house into which she had retired. After such crimes, nothing, how horrid soever, can appear asto- nishing in the Hfe of such a monster as Nero. He spared neither his A. D. 54—68] NERO. 89 first wife, Octavia, whose veins were opened by his orders; nor his second, called Poppea, whom, in a fit of rage, he killed by a blow with his foot: nor his tutor Burrhus, whom, it was believed, he poi- soned, in order to rid himself of his admonitions; nor his preceptor Seneca, who, together with the poet Lucan, being accused of having taken part in some conspiracy against him, was commanded to termi- nate his own existence ; a command which both obeyed.* Nero sported with the lives of others, and Rome daily lost her most virtuous and diustrious citizens, the victims of his tyranny. In the mean time, it was necessary to adopt measures for repelling the Parthians from Armenia, which they had lately invaded. Corbulo, a general of well known talents, was sent against them. When he arrived in Syria to take the command of the legions, he found them greatly weakened by idleness and insubordmation. His first care was to subject them, as well as the new levies, to the laws of strict disci- pline, and to train them to the hardships of war by constant labor, painful marches or encampments, and other military exercises; by rewards properly bestowed and punishments justly inflicted; but par- ticularly by giving to all the example of unshaken courage in dangers, and unconquerable fortitude in enduring fatigue. As soon as Corbulo could rely on his troops, he led them against the enemy. On their side, the Parthians advanced against him, under the command of Tiridate, a brother to their king Vologeses. Accord- ing to their custom, they moved with rapidity from place to place, and by this wild and desultory warfare, rnore than by victories, kept the country in constant alarm. Corbulo endeavored, but in vain, to bring them to an engagement: he was obliged to adopt the very plan of the enemy, and dividing his troops into separate bodies, at last suc- ceeded in counteracting all the operations of Tiridate. This however did not suffice to terminate the war, and more decisive measures were resorted to by the Roman general. He pressed for- ward, compelled all the towns and fortresses in his way to surrender and finally arrived before Artaxate, the capital of Armenia : it was taken in one day, and burnt, after sufficient time had been allowed to the inhabitants to save their lives; Tigranocerta, another important city, surrendered without resistance, and was spared by the conquerors. The Parthians, then terrified at the sudden and repeated successes of Corbulo, sued for peace. It was granted, and even Armenia, which had been the chief occasion of this long struggle, was given as a pos- session to Tiridate, on the sole condition that he would lay down his diadem at the feet of the emperor's statue in the Roman camp, and afterwards repaii to Rome, to receive it again from the emperor him- ♦ See note A. 40 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. sell'. Terms so favorable to his fortune, the Parthian prince readily accepted and faithfully executed. The Romans, on their part, strictly fulfilled their engagements; thus we see that they were still terrible in battle, and moderate after victory. What Corbulo did in Asia, was done m Great Britain by Suetonius Pauhnus, another famous general. To him the empire was indebted for the reduction of the isle of Mona, now called Anglesey, where he established a garrispa and destroyed the groves used by the natives for their cruel and superstitious rites. But the Britons, avaihng them- selves of his absence, formed a powerful league to recover their free- dom, and to throw off a yoke which the insolence and extortions of the Roman soldiers rendered every day more oppressive. The whole province rose in arms; the colonies founded by the conquerors were laid waste with fire and sword; London and other municipal towns were pillaged, and .their inhabitants slaughtered to the number of seventy thousand persons, all citizens or alhes. Suetonius had returned, and was now endeavoring to put down the insurrection. He formed his best troops into one body of about ten thousand men, and determined, notwithstanding the enormous disproportion between this number and that of the insurgents, to at- tack them, and bring on a decisive battle. For this end, he selected a spot encircled with woods, narrow at the entrance, and protected in the rear by a thick forest. In that situation, he had no fear of an ambuscade, and the enemy had no access except in front. The Bri- tons brought into the open plain that lay before them, an immense multitude of warriors (no less than two hundred and thirty thousand, according to Dion Cassius), under the command of dueen Boadicea, a woman of mascuhne courage. They were already exulting, and so confident of victory, that they had placed their wives upon wagons at the extremity of the plain, to enable them to survey the action, and behold the wonders of British valor. When the signal for battle was given, the Britons seeing the Ro- mans silent and motionless in their narrow defile, advanced with ra- pidity, and discharged their darts. At that moment, the legionaries rushed forward m the form of a wedge; the cavalry at the same time bore down upon the enemy, and overpowered all who dared to resist. The Britons betook themselves to flight; but, as a retreat was ex- tremely difficult, on account of the wagons Avhich they had placed in the rear, a dreadful slaughter ensued, in which eighty thousand of these unfortunate people are said to have perished ; whereas the Ro mans lost only four hundred men. This splendid victory, equal to an) of ancient times, greatly contributed to keep Britain in subjection; the more so, as Boadicea, unable to bear the idea of such a defeat. A. D. 54—68. NEEO. 41 survived but a very short time. Still, the country was not entirely subdued until the reign of Domitian. Whilst, at the two extremities of the empire, Corbulo and Sue- tionius maintained its majesty, in Rome it was more and more de- graded by Nero. He plunged without shame into every kind of de- bauchery. He frequently spent the night in running through the streets, in the garb of a slave, accompanied by a band of rioters, with whom he attacked every one that he met, and stole whatever fell in his way. His delight during the day was to drive chariots in the circus, or to act the part of a comedian on the stage : there he danced, sang and played on the lute, compelling the audience to ad- mire him and give him their applause. His daily expenses were enormous : he endeavored to dispel the horror which his crimes excited, by making large donations of lands, houses, gold, silver, jewels and other valuable objects, to the com- mon people ; also by having magnificent plays and shows frequently repeated. Not satisfied with all this, he was fond of exciting sur- prise by the singularity of his exhibitions, and would often unite at the same time and place, shows of a difierent and even contrary kinds : for example, a vast sheet of water, would, the moment after a sea- fight had been performed on it, be instantly drained, and become a field of battle for land troop and gladiators. Dion Cassius men- sions a certain occasion on which the scene was changed in this manner four times in one day. While Nero thus consulted the gratification of the people, he was still more attentive to his own. Not to mention the extravagant luxury of his table, he built a place so magnificent, so profusely ornamented with ivory, gold and precious stones, that it received the name of the " golden palace." When it was finished, Nero said that then, for the first time, he had a decent habitation. He hazarded at gaming immense sums of money ; never put on the same coat twice ; never undertook a journey without taking along with him at least a thousand carriages, with a proportionate number of attendants in costly apparel, drivers splendidly dressed, and mules shod with sil- ver. In fine he was as fond of his monkey as Caligula had been of his horse ; and accordingly, he gave it dwellings in the town and lands in the country, and after its death, buried it with royal pomp. If to this profusion we add his mania for building, we shall easily conceive how the revenues of the whole empire were not sufficient for Nero. As he was determined constantly to follow up his extra- vagant principles, rapine and extortion became his only resource. Towards the end of his reign, so exorbitant were the contributions which he exacted, that not only Italy, but also the provinces,* all the parts of the empire, and even the allies, were ruined. 4* 42 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. His cruelties were always equal to his other enormities. The blood of illustrious citizens continued, under various pretences, to be spilt in Rome; "At last," says Tacitus, "Nero desired to destroy virtue it- self, by putting to death Barea Soranus and Thrasea Psetus, the two most distinguished and virtuous members of the senate."* Corbulo, as the reward of his great services, received sentence of capital pun^ ishment, the execution of which he prevented by killing himself; and Vespasian narrowly escaped the same fate, for having slept whilst the emperor was singing on the stage. It seemed that nothing more was requisite to render Nero an ac- complished monster, than that he should become an incendiary ; and such he really became (a. d. 64). To him most historians attribute the famous conflagration which in that year destroyed two-thirds of Rome. It lasted nme days, during which there was nothing to be seen in the city but consternation and despair. Nero, on the con- trary, from the summit of a tower, contemplated with delight the devouring flames, and in a theatrical dress, sang verses on the burn- ing of Troy. Such, at least, was the common report at the time. The town was rebuilt upon a new and more regular plan ; but the wretched prince, in order to remove the just suspicion that it had been set on fire by his orders, laid this crime to the charge of the Christians, who, by the apostolic labors of St. Peter and St. Paul, were already very numerous in Rome. As the purity of their lives was a censure on the corruption of the age, and their total separation from pagan festivities, an occasion of hatred and contempt, Nero thought them fit subjects for public vengeance.f Numbers of them * Tacit, ^nnal. lib. XVI, n. xxi. f.Thus an unjust and atrocious charge g^ave rise to the first persecution which the Church of Christ had to suffer from the Gentiles. It was fit that her first persecutor should be the same prince who proved an enemy to all virtue. But the example being once set by him, was afterwards too faith- fully imitated, and from this time to the reign of Constantine the Great, the Christians were almost continually vexed and tormented, as well under the good as under the bad emperors. These persecutions were carried on, sometimes by command of the em- perors themselves urjjed on by ruthless magistrates; sometimes by an in- surrection of the people; and sometimes by solemn decrees pronounced in the senate, upon the rescripts of princes, or in their presence. Then the I)ersecution was more universal and bloody ; and thus the malice of unbe- lievers, ever inveterately bent on destroying the Church, was excited, from time to time, to new acts of fury. From these successive outbreaks of vio- lence, ecclesiastical historians reckon ten persecutions under ten emperors Of all the faithful, the bishops were always the most severely treated ; of all the Churches, the Church of Rome was persecuted with the greatest violence; and thirty Sovereign Pontiffs sealed with their blood that Gospel which they declared to the whole earth, ■ — See Bossuet, Discourse on Unit. History, part I, ad mm. 60 and 95. A. D. 54:— 68] NERO. 43 were arrested, and doomed to suffer the most frightful torments. Some, wrapped in the skins of wild beasts, were left to he devoured by dogs; others, fixed to a cross, waited in the most cruel agonies, the slow approach of death; others were burned alive, and many, covered with inflammable matter which was set on fire, served as torches during the night in the imperial gardens. In order to enjoy this awful spectacle, Nero went through the avenues in his chariot, in the dress of a charioteer. It was during this persecution that St. Peter and St. Paul suffered martyrdom, the former by the cross, the latter by the sword, both at Rome, and on the same day. Nero had now gone through all the stages of his execrable life. His power was upheld only by terror, and by numerous troops of satellites whom he amply rewarded. At length, all mankind, whose oppressor he was, rose up against him, after Vindex in Gaul and Galba in Spain had given the signal of the general insurrection. The news, disregarded at first by Nero, very soon filled him with terror and rage. It was reported that, in his despair, he wished to send assassins into all the provinces, to kill the governors, the gene- rals of armies and the exiles, to poison the senators at a feast, to set fire to the town in various parts, and at the same time to let loose all the wild beasts kept for the public shows, in order to prevent the in- habitants from extinguishing the flames. He thought afterwards of raising new troops for his defence, or of moving by his tears the compassion of the army ; and at length resolved to fly into Egypt. But he had neither time nor power to execute any of his designs. The example of Vindex and Galba was readily followed throughout the empire, and even in the capital itself by the Praetorian guards. The tyrant then retired to a country-house, four miles from Rome^ the property of a certain Phaon, one of his freed-men, where he hoped to remain concealed ; but the senate, after having been silent and timid for so long a time, now ordered that he should be sought after, apprehended, and put to an ignominious death. Nero, at the first intelligence of the fatal edict, was struck with terror, and wept both at the approach of his last hour and at the loss of his musical voice. Whilst thus lamenting, he heard the sound of horses* feet, and the noise of the soldiers sent to drag him from his retreat, and already quite near the house; he then wished some of his atten- dants to embolden him, by setting him the example of a voluntary death. As no one was disposed to be so complaisant, he drew a dag- ger, and applying it to his breast; "What a musician," said he, "the world is going to lose !" Still he hesitated : at length, with the help of Epaphroditus, his freedman, he stabbed himself and expired, in the thirty-first year of his age and the fourteenth of iiis reign 4A MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. (a. d. 68); the very same day (the eleventh of June) on which he hud put his unfortunate wife Octavia to death, six years before. The family of Ctesar Augustus became extinct by the death of Nero. St. Augustine assigns to him the first place in the catalogue of wicked emperors f an opinion which has been embraced by pos- terity : for, in the common judgment of men, no greater odium can be thrown on any prince, even on a profligate tyrant, than to call him a second JVero. GALEA— OTHO— VITELLIUS.— A. r. 68—69. Galea, that governor of Spain whom we have already mentionedL, experienced no difficulty in causmg himself to be acknowledged em peror. He was of noble extraction, venerable for his age, and dis- tinguished for his abilities in inferior employments. But when em- peror, his conduct answered neither the eminence of his dignity, nor the public expectations. On the one hand, his excessive confidence in unworthy frieads led him into many faults : on the other, his par- simony and severity provoked the hatred of the soldiers, and their fury rose to such a pitch, that they stabbed him in the middle of Rome, after he had reigned seven months. Otho, a dissolute and ambitious man, who had been the chief leader of the conspiracy against Galba, succeeded him upon the throne. Still, he was acknowledged only in the capital and in the neighboring provinces, the legions of Germany, having about the same time, declared their commander Vitellius emperor. The two rivals had recourse to arms in support of their respective claims. Otho was successful in the beginning; but his forces were soon after defeated at Bedriacum, a village near Cremona in Lombardy, and though he had still numerous armies at his disposal, he killed him- self after a reign of three months : the whole empire now declared for Vitellius. This however was not so much owing to the abilities of Vitellius himself, as to the exertions of his generals and the bravery of his troops. His personal merit consisted chiefly in eating and drinking. He took four abundant and costly meals every day, and all countries and seas were laid under contribution, in order to furnish the most exquisite game and fish for his table. No repast could be offered to him below the value of four bundled thousand sesterces (about ten thousand dollars); so that even the richest citizens were ruined by * J)e Civit. Dei, lib. V c. xix. A. D. 68 — f)9.] GALBA — OTITO — VITELLIUS. 45 the expenses which his visit occasioned. Lucius Vitellius, his brother, gave him a dinner in wjjich two thousand fishes and seven thousand birds were served up at table. His guests lost their heakh in con sequence of this excessive and uninterrupted good cheer, and one of them, called Vibius Priscus, having contracted a disease which dis- pensed him with attending those fatal repasts, congratulated himself saying : *' I was undone, had I not fallen sick." The sovereign power, thus degraded by so many contemptible princes, at last passed into better hands. The legions of the East, justly indignant at seeing those of the West and the Prajtorians in Rome dispose of the empire at their pleasure, offered the crown to their own general Vespasian, a man of low birth, but of remarkable talents. He hesitated for a time, fearing the unhappy consequences that might possibly happen ; at length, he yielded to the advice and entreaties of his friends, and was acknowledged emperor by all the eastern provinces. But the main object was to induce the inhabitants of Rome and Italy to declare in his favor. As they continued to side with Vitellius, Vespasian resolved to subdue them by famine, and by stopping the convoys of provisions from Egypt. This was indeed a wise and prudent scheme, though it might have taken a long time to obtain full success; but Antonius Primus, one of Vespasian's gene- rals, rendered it unnecessary, by the bold and decisive measure which he look to decide the quarrel at once. It is interesting to see how, in a few weeks, this general, full of ardor and activity, arrived from Illyria, surmounted all obstacles in his way, repeatedly defeated the Vitellian forces, and, pursuing his victorious career, attacked Rome itself, forced an entrance into that capital, and quickly terminated the contest by annihilating the party of Vitellius. Primus entered Italy by the north, at the head of the Illyrican legions and some auxiliaries from Ma^sia. His march was rapid, and met with little or no resistance, till he reached the neighborhood of Cremona, where he found himself opposed by those same legions of Get many, whose valor had placed Vitellius on the throne. Two of them formed a sort of van-guard, while six others were yet at a distance Primus judged that the success of the whole campaign depended on preventing their junction, and fighting ihe.Ti separately. Accordingly, he took along with him four thousand liorses, and leaving orders to the infantry to follow as speedily as possible, he advanced against the two legions. The victory was entirely his work. At the first attack, his soldiers, not expecting so vigorous a resistance, fled in disorder, notwithstanding the efl^orts of Primus to stop them. He appeared wherever there was extreme danger or some gleam of hope, pierced with his pike the standard-bearer whom he saw flying, and taking the standard in his own hands, turned it towards the enemy. His 46 MODERN HISTORY. [PARTI. intrepidity changed the fortune of the day. Shame at the thought of abandoning so brave a general, kept around him about a hundred horsemen, and whilst they sustained the shock, their companions also returned to the field of battle. The Viiellians began to waver, were routed, and retired into the city of Cremona. In the evening, all the forces of Primus were assembled. Animated by their first success, they asked to be led without delay to the attack of the town ; nor could their ardor be checked, until they received in- formation that the six other Vitellian legions had just arrived, and were ready to renew the battle. Primus did hot lose one instant: he arrayed his troops, placed the auxiharies in front; the legions five in number, in the centre ; the cavalry on the wings and rear, and in this order waited for the enemy. The engagement became general towards nine o'clock at night; and notwithstanding the confusion which darkness necessarily occasioned, was carried on with a fury scarcely to be conceived. Nearly the whole night, the issue was doubtful, though there seemed to be some disadvantage on the side of Primus, whose legions suffered dreadfully from the military engines of their opponents. The light of the rising moon began to turn the bloody contest in his favor. The shadows of bodies were projected towards the Vitellians, who, deceived by the appearance and believing the enemy to be nearer, did not throw theii darts far enough : whereas they themselves were clearly discerned by their foes, who hurled their weapons with unerring aim.* No sooner could Primus distinguish objects, than he went through every rank, animating his troops, and with equal dexterity and suc- cess, he availed himself of the rising of the sun : the soldiers of the third legion, who had served under Corbulo in Asia, saluted it with loud cries, according to the Syriac custom; whence a rumor was spread, and obtained credit among the combatants, probably through a strata- gem of Primus, that great reinforcements had come to his army. The Vitellians began to waver: Primus, perceiving this, pressed them with redoubled vigor, and breaking their ranks by a last effort, put them completely to flight. They were pursued with great slaughter, till they reached the camp that surrounded Cremona. In order to deprive them of this last resource, the victorious army resolved to attack the camp without delay. This, indeed, offered almost insuperable difficulties, as it was defended by a whole army, and well fortified by a ditch, a parapet, * Neutro inclmaverat fortuna, donee adulta nocte, luna surgens ostenderet dcies, falleretqae. Sed Flavianis aequior a tergo: hinc majores equorum virorumque umbra?, et falso, ut in corpora, ictn, tela hoslium cilra cadebant' Vitelliani adverso lumine collucentes, velut ex occulto jaculantibus, incauti ofForebantur — Tacit. Hislor. lib. Ill, n. xxiii. ^. D. (58 — 69.] GALB4— OTHO — VITELLIUS. 47 and powerful engines which threw with violence darts and stones. But nothing could check the ardor of the soldiers of Primus: they ad- vanced towards the intrench ments with their shields joined and raised over their heads ; here again a fierce combat ensued. The assailants were exposed to an incessant shower of arrows and enormous stones from the ViteUian engines; aUhough wounded, bruised and repulsed, they renewed the attack, mounted upon each other's shoulders, wrested the swords from the hands of their opponents, leaped upon the ram- parts, or broke open the gates, and rushing into the camp, filled it in one moment with mangled bodies and streams of blood. These three victories were the work of twenty-four hours, and the fruit of the most obstinate courage ever displayed by Romans fighting against Romans. The third legion distinguished itself on that occa- sion in a particular manner, and maintained its former glory. But no glory was equal to that acquired by Primus in these actions : he had, as it were, by a single blow, commenced and nearly finished the war, nor could the Vitellians ever regain their former ascendency. The city of Cremona, struck with terror, surrendered to the victors, and having unfortunately done so without previous conditions, was abandoned to plunder and destroyed by fire. All the West began to follow the example of the East, and to declare for Vespasian ; so that Rome and a few Italian provinces were all that now remained on the side of Vitellius, and even these but for a short time. ' After some transactions of minor importance. Primus with his vic- torious troops arrived before the walls of the capital. Here also they were vigorously opposed; a series of battles which were fought at the gates, afterwards m the streets, and finally in the prcetorian camp, cost the lives of fifty thousand persons. In every one of them, the soldiers of Primus conquered their opponents; the Vitellians were driven to their last posts, and, though they still resisted with deter- mined courage, being overpov/cred by numbers, all fell, with their faces turned towards the enemy. Vitellius, unworthy of so brave soldiers, shut himself up in a lit- ter, and was carried to a house in a distant part of the town, from which he intended secretly to make his escape and retire into Cam- pania. But either fear and restlessness of mind, or the hope of kind treatment from the conquerors, induced him to return to his palace; he found it changed into a vast solitude, and the apartments closed, all his officers and servants having fled. Weary of wandering about, he concealed himself behind a bed in the porter's room, but was soon discovered by a party of the victorious soldiers. Notwithstanding his entreaties, they led him away with his hands tied behind him, his clothes torn, and a cord about his neck, not one person showing him the least compassion. Nay more, some were so inhuman as to prick 48 MODERN HISTORY. [PART. 1. his chin with their swords, to force him to raise his head and see his statues overthrown. He was dragged in this manner to the common dung-hill, where they put him to death, and then threw his body into the Tiber. He had reigned eight months, reckoning from the death of Otho, who himself had reigned only three: so that the same year (a. D. 69) saw four successive emperors, viz : Galba, who died in Janu- ary, Oiho in April, Vitellius in December, and Vespasian who was left sole master before the end of this same month. VESPASIAN.— A. D. 69—79. The year following (a. d. 70) was rendered famous by the entire overthow of the Jews, and by the destruction of their nation, city and temple.* From the time when Judea, like so many other countries of the East, after having been subdued by the Romans, was formed into a province of the empire, the Jews always bore the yoke with extreme reluctance. Their desire to shake it ofl", was continually increased by the tyranny and extortions of the Roman governors. Under Flo- rus, the last governor, their patience was completely exhausted, and public animosity being raised to the highest pitch, ihey rose in arms in the year 66, two years before the death of Nero. Their first endeavors were generally successful. They defeated the Romans, killed many of them, and repulsed Cestius Gallus, the go- vernor of Syria, who had come to the assistance of Florus. But affairs on each side assumed a very different aspect, when Vespasian received from Nero the charge of prosecuting the war against the Jews. Under this able general, the Romans quickly recovered their usual superiority. Nearly the whole of Galilee and Judea was sub- dued in two campaigns, and, although the insurgents fought in many places with desperate valor, Vespasian drove them from their posi- tions, and approached Jerusalem. He then prepared to lay siege to this capital ; but, being at that time proclaimed emperor, he departed for Egypt, aud left to his son Titus the conduct of the war. Jerusalem, one of the principal cities of the East, was a place of very difficult access. Its high position on two mountains, a double, even treble enclosure of strong walls and towers where the approach was naturally easier, and many other fortifications, would have rendered it unconquerable, had not the obstinacy and bHndness of its inhabitants forced, as it were, the justice of God to achieve their ruin. The * See note B. A. D. 69—79.] VESPASIAN. • 49 Roman legions commanded by Titus encamped round the city towards the beginning of April, and, as this was about Easter, one of the principal solemnities of the Jews, an immense multitude of people hap- pened thus to be shut up as in a prison. Their provisions were soon consumed, and famine began to exercise its ravages. Moreover, there were in the town two or three furious factions, which, it is true, united their efforts to oppose the assaults of the Romans, but, as soon as the danger was over, quarrelled and fought among themselvf s. They did not perhaps let one day pass, without committing new cm elties, and staining with blood the streets of the city or the pavements of the temple. The siege lasted until September, and during all that time, Titus unceasingly called upon the wretched inhabitants to surrender, giving them a full assurance of pardon. All was useless ; they defended every inch of ground and opposed every attack with such obstmate fury, that the besiegers sometimes despaired of success ; once, espe- cially, when, after having labored for seventeen days to prepare bat- tering rams and other engines of war, they could not prevent their being burnt and destroyed by the Jews in the space of a few hours. Titus himself, though he had already obtained possession of the first and second walls, was at a loss how to act in order to repair this loss. After much deliberation, he resolved to change, in some particulars, his former plan of attack, and the soldiers as well as officers armed themselves with new courage for the execution of his designs. By his orders, they built all around the city, six miles in circumference, a wall fortified by thirteen towers, to prevent the escape of the rebels and the introduction of provisions into the town. Through the won- derful activity of the Romans, the work was finished in tliree days. From that time especially, the famine raged most dreadfully in Jerusalem. The greater part of its inhabitants were reduced to eat such things as they could not behold without horror ; the leather of their shoes and shields, dried hay, withered herbs, were food which they would greedily devour. The soldiers of each faction violently entered the houses, and visited every corner, to discover provisions. If they found any, they wrested it from the owners; if they found none, they put those unfortunate people to the rack, and made them suffer cruel torments, in order to force them to disclose what might be concealed. Barbarity was carried so far as to take from the poorest among the people some herbs and grain which they had collected during the night outside of the walls, at the risk of their lives; with- out leaving them a small part which they asked in the name of God Neither women nor little children were spared, when found with a little food in their hands. 'And this was not done by the soldiers only. All hearts were 60 ' MODERN HISTORY. [PART. 1. Steeled against the feelings of humanity and compassion. HusbanJs would snatch meat from their wives ; children would wrest it from the.r parents; and what ahnost surpasses belief, mothers would deprive their litde infants of the necessaries of life. Nay, one of tliem went so far as to deprive of Hfe itself her little child, in order to eat its llesh, and prolong her own existence by that horrid sustenance. The houses seemed to be changed into graves, most of them being fillea with dead and dying. The streets were strewed with so many corpses which blocked up the way, that an order was given by the chiefs of the rebels, to gather them into great heaps in some uninna- bited buildings, or to throw them from the wall into the valley. More than six hundred thousand bodies were thus thrown, and, at one gate only, there were counted one hundred and sixteen thousand in the space of three months. As to the survivors, they resembled so many skeletons or walking ghosts : the whole city presented nothmg but desolation and the image of death. When the Romans heard these things, some would not beheve them ; others were moved to compassion ; but the greater number, inflamed with indignation, became still more animated against the Jewish people than they were before. Tims heaved a deep sigh and called heaven to witness that he was not the author of such hor rid miseries, since he had frequently, but in vain, offered a full par don to the Jews if they would surrender. He therefore determined to carry on the siege whh fresh vigor, this being the only means to subdue those furious rebels. New and repeated assaults took place, in which extraordinary efforts were made, and many persons killed on each side; at length, the Romans carried by storm the third wall with the lower part of the town, and entered the porticos of the tem pie and its exterior galleries, which they set on fire. It was the wish of Titus to save the temple itself; but one of the soldiers, says the historian Josephus, hurried on by a certain divine impulse, took a fire-brand, and being lifted up by another soldier, threw it into one of the inner rooms contiguous to the sanctuary. The flames immediately rose. In vain did the Jews endeavor to ex- tinguish them ; in vain did Titus also make the most strenuous efforts to stop the conflagration : in spite of both the conqueror and the con- q^uered, the fire spread with unusual rapidity. At the same time, the legions, fc nd of pillage, and enraged by the long resistance they had met with, "ilew all who had taken refuge in the temple and the galle- ries. The whole space was soon covered with dead bodies, over which the Romans advanced in pursuit of the Jews who fled befure them, and streams of blood were running through the flames. The conflagration was so violent, and the building so extensive, that the hiU upon which it stood seemed all on fire ; whilst the outcries of an A. li. 69 — 79.] VESPASIAN. '51 immense number of Jews, prolonged by the neighboring echoes, were heard un all j-iices, and increased the horror of the scene. The fatal day was come: that splendid temple, the most celebrated in the universe, and the centre of the true religion tjefore the coming of Christ, was in a few hours reduced to ashes and to a heap of ruins. It perished after a duration of six hundred years, and, by a sinking occurrence, was consumed by fire in the same month and on the same day (the tenth of August), on which the former temple or tem- ple of Solomon was burnt by Nabuchodonosor, king of Babylon. Although the rebels still made some resistance in the upper part of the town, Titus found no difficuhy in expelling them from all the positions which they occupied. The Romans completed the reduc- tion of Jerusalem on the eighth of September, and put every thing to fire and sword. What the flames had spared, was entirely demolished, and levelled with the ground: not a stone was left upon a stone, in the whole city ; only some parts of the western wall and three re- markable towers were preserved, both for the sake of the Roman gar- rison which was to be left in Judea, and as monuments of so signal a victory. The booty, notwithstanding the ravages of the tire, was so great, that gold lost half its value in the neighboring provinces. Eleven hundred thousand Jews perished during the siege ; ninety- seven thousand were made prisoners, and condemned, some to hard labor, others to death ; whilst many were sold at a low price, and dispersed all over the earth. Thus were the predictions of our Lord concerning the utter destruc tion of Jerusalem, entirely fulfilled.* It was a manifest punishment of the crime of deicide, which the Jews had committed thirty-seven years before; and of the awful imprecation which they had uttered with one voice, during our Saviour's passion : " His blood be upon us, and upon our children. "+ Titus himself, though a heathen, viewing all the circumstances of their disaster, the most extraordinary that ever befell a nation, confessed that he was only the instrument of divine vengeance4 This the Jews also would have acknowledged, had they not har- dened their hearts, and shut their eyes against the light. During many years before the war, they were admonished of their impending calamity by prodigies more and more terrific. All their doctors con- fess that strange phenomena were daily seen in the temple; in sc much, that a famous Rabbin cried out one day : '' O temple! temple! What is it that moves thee, and why art thou thus terrified?" In the year imme'diately preceding the beginning of hostilities be • Matt, xxiv.— Mark, xiii.— Luke, xix, xxi. f Matt xxvii. 25. ; Josephus, Be hello Jud. lib. VL-Philost. vit. Jpoll. Tyaix. lib. VL 52 MODEKN HISTORY. [PART 1. tween ihe Jews and Romans, on Easter-Day, a gate of the inner court of the temple, all of brass, and so heavy that twenty men could scarcely move it, was opened of its own accord. Some weeks later, chariots and troops of soldiers in their armor, were beheld running among the clouds, and surrounding the cities. What is more striking than the noise heard in the sanctuary on the day of Pentecost, and that audible voice which issued from the mmost recess of that sacred place: *' Let us go hence, let us go hence?" The holy Angels, guardians of the temple, loudly declared that they were forsaking it, because Almighty God, who had there established his abode during so many ages, had now given it up to reprobation. Josephus* and Tacitusf have both related these prodigies, which therefore cannot be reasonably doubted. The following one, although mentioned by Josephus only, must however appear the least ques- tionable of all, as having been visible to the whole people. Four years before the war commenced, a certain man going up from the country to Jerusalem for the feast of the Tabernacles,:]: suddenly began to crv out : " a voice from the east, a voice from the west, a voice from the four winds 3 a voice against the temple and against Jerusa- lem j a voice against all the people!" From that time he ceased not crying day and night: " wo, wo to Jerusalem!" He redoubled his cries on the festival-days. No other words fell from his lipsj those who pitied him, those who rebuked him, those who gave him the necessaries of life, could never obtain from him any thing but this terrible sentence: "wo to Jerusalem!" He was arrested, tried by the magistrates, and condemned to be scourged : at every question, and at every lash, he constantly answered, without ever complaining of his suffenngs; " wo to Jerusalem!" Being dismissed as a madman, he ran up and down the whole country, incessantly repeating the same awful prediction, "wo to Jerusalem!" For seven years he continued to cry out in this manner without relaxation, the strength of his voice remaining ever the same. During the siege of Jerusalem, he shut himself up in the city, going incessantly round the walls, and crying with all his might: " wo to the temple! wo to the city ! wo to all the people !" at last he added, " wo to myself!" and was imme- diately carried off by a stone shot from an engine ; thus having been, at the same time, a prophet, a witness, and a visible proof of the divme vengeance lying heavy upon his whole nation. Shortly after the destruction of Jerusalem, Titus repaired by land to Alexandria, and thence by sea to Rome. The emperor, his father, • Josephus, De bello Judaico, lib. VI. f Tacitus, histor. lib. V. n. xiii X Thus called, from the custom of the Jews to make on that feast taber nacles or tents, as a memorial of their having dwelt undev tents for forty years in the desert. A. D. 69 — 79.] VESPASIAN. 53 went forward from the city to meet him; and they enjoyed togethei the honors of a magnificent triumph, for the successful conclusion of the Jewish war. The reign of Vespasian henceforward passed in peace. This wise prince restored the empire to its ancient splendor. He respected the laws, and caused them to be respected by others ; enforced the rules of military discipline ; prevented or punished oppression ; encouraged virtue and talents. The luxury of the Roman tables was an invete- rate evil, and stronger than all laws : Vespasian checked it by his example, private individuals being ashamed to indulge in extrava- gant expenses, whilst their emperor declared himself a lover of plain- ness and simplicity. Whatever savored of effeminacy, so highly displeased him, that being one day accosted by a young man strongly perfumed, who came to thank him for a preferment which he had lately obtained; "I had rather you smelt of garlic," said Vespasian, with a stern and contemptuous look; and immediately revoked his commission. He was also very careful to procure a right and speedy adminis- tration of justice. The pleadings frequently took place before him; his tribunal was public, and his judgements obtained almost general approbation. Being not less beneficent than just, the disasters which Rome and other cities experienced, were the objects of his solicitude. Amiable and cheerful with his friends, merciful to his enemies, good, humane and affable to all, he gave free access to his palace, the gates of which were constantly open ; and he was seen to shed tears^ over criminals whom he could not save from punishment. On one occasion only, his usual clemency disappeared. A certain Sabinus had assumed in Gaul the title of Casar; being defeated towards the beginning of Vespasian's reign, and having remained for several years concealed in a cavern, he was at length discovered and brought to Rome. Eponina, his wife, who had never abandoned him, threw herself at the emperor's feet, and by her supplications and tears, endeavored to excite his compassion. Vespasian was in- deed moved with pity, and even sensibly affected; but his emotion yielded to the severity of his political principles, and both Eponina and Sabinus were condemned to death. No one knew the motives of a rigor so unnecessary, at least in appearance, and which leaves a blot on the memory of so good an emperor. He is also accused of too great a love of money. The charge may be true in some respects ; but we ought not to forget that Vespa- sian ever made a noble and generous use of his revenues. Besides other instances of his hberality, some of which have been already mentioned, he was the first who gave pensions to the professors of Greek and Latin eloquence at Rome. He attracted to that city the 5* 54 MODEKN HISTORY. [PART 1. oest scholars, and the ablest workmen of the time, without however disregarding those of inferior merit and hurling their interests. One uf the former, an excellent machinist, having offered to transport heavy burdens at a small expense by machines of his invention, the tmperor rewarded him well for the offer, but would not make use of it; " for," said he, " w^e must not deprive the poor of their means oi" subsistence." It was by such amiable qualities, and by repeated acts of a good government, that Vespasian deserved the title of father of his coun- try, which was conferred on him nearly in the same manner as it had been on Augustus. Though advanced in age, he continued to administer the public affairs to the end of his life, and gave audience 2ven in his last- sickness. He was however sensible of the danger of his situation, and said one day: "It seems to me I am going to be- come a god; thus deriding, in an ingenious manner, the apotheosis which would follow his death. When he felt that he had but few moments to hve, he was heard to say: "It is proper that an emperor should die standing;" and, making an effort to rise, he expired in the arms of those who supported him, in the seventieth year of his life and tenth of his reign (a. ». 79). Under him was made the last census of the Roman citizens. In Italy alone, there were found, according to Pliny, fifty-four per sons at least a hundred years old. Ten had reached the age of one hundred and twenty-five or thirty years, three the age of one hun- dred and forty, and two that of one hundred and fifty. TITUS.— A. D. 79—81. Vespasian was succeeded by his elder son Titus, a most excellem prince, whose eulogium is comprised in the appellation of the De- light of Mankind, under which he is known. From the time of his accession to the throne, nothing appeared in him but a wonderful generosity and benevolence, from which his very bitterest enemies were not excluded. Two patricians being convicted of a conspiracy against him, he granted them a fuil pardon, and had the kind attention to send a messenger to the mother of one of them, to assure her that her son had nothing to fear from his resentment. Moreover, he in- vited the two guilty persons to sup with him, and on the following day, at an exhibition of gladiators, made them sit by his side, and hold for some time the arms of the combatants, which wew brought to him according to custom. A. D. 79 — 81.] TITUS. 55 Titus never sent away any person discontented, never, at ieast^ without some hope and consolation j saying that no one should go sorrowful from his prince. Every one knows in what manner he once expressed his regret at having let a day pass without doing some good office; *' My friends," said he, "I have lost a day;" an expression worthy of being transmitted to the latest posterity, and infinitely more glorious than all the victories of Alexander and Ju- lius Cffisar. The manifold disasters and calamitous events which happened du- rmg the reign of Titus, afforded him continual opportunities to dis- play his beneficence. The most dreadful of those visitations was an eruption of Mount Vesuvius in Italy. Even the mere forerunners of it were terrific: a violent earthquake, subterraneous sounds like thunder, the soil burning, the sea foaming, the heavens in a blaze; all was calculated to fill every bosom with dread and consternation. Then, for three days, the volcano belched forthwith terrific violence, so great a quantity of hot ashes, large stones, and lurid flame, that the day was obscured, the sun was darkened, and the world seemed to be returning to iis pristine chaos. Pliny the naturalist, or the elder, one of the most learned and la- borious writers of antiquity, was at that time the commander of the Roman fleet at Misenum, a promontory at the distance of tv/enty or twenty-five miles from Mount Vesuvius. He saw the beginning of the eruption, without knowing exactly what it was. Desirous to have a nearer view of the phenomenon, he advanced on board a galley towards the volcano. Having landed, he found every thing in strange confusion, a new promontory formed by the violence of the earthquake, and numbers of people flying on all sides, for the pur- pose of avoiding the continual eruption of stones, ashes and smoke from the volcano. He himself, notwithstanding his intrepidity, wished after a short stay, to return to his ship. It was too late: be- fore he could reembark, there burst forth a sulphurous vapor accom- panied with flames; all ran from the imminent danger; but Pliny having a weak breast, could not resist the suffocating exhalation, and fell dead on the spot. His body was found two days after, without any external injury. In the meanwhile, Pliny the younger, afterwards so famous for his eloquence, was with his mother at Misenum, in their dwelhng near the sea. Though it was far from the volcano, they saw themselves exposed, with the other inhabitants of the town, to great perils from the violence of the earthquake, and the clouds of smoke and ashes, which were carried to a great distance in different directions. Pliny's mother exhorted him to save his life by flight, saying that her ad- vanced age and infirmities did not permit her to make her escape. 56 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. But Pliny would never consent to the separation; she \vas prevailed upon to follow him, and they went together, accompanied by a great crowd of people. The day was changed into the darkest night j nothing guided their trembling steps, except the dismal flames which from time to time flickered on the top of the mountain. They were frequently covered with ashes; even the flame seemed to advance towards them; it did not however reach them, and they had the good fortune to escape. When the eruption was over, the surrounding country presented a scene of desolation. The cities of Pompeii and Herculaneura were buried under heaps of ashes, and remained so for more than sixteen hundred years, until the last century, when the people of that country, whilst engaged in digging wells and quarries, dis- covered them at the depth of many feet beneath the surface. Tem- ples and other buildings have been found there, with statues, inscrip- tions, vessels, even fruits, olives, wheat and bread, preserved in the cement and lava which covered them at the time of the eruption. The inhabitants had very probably withdrawn to a distance; hence the loss of these two cities could not be deemed in itself a very great disaster: but the volcanic substances with which the whole country was now overspread, occasioned so dreadful a pestilence throughout Italy, that in Rome it carried ofi" ten thousand persons every day for a considerable space of time. In fine, a terrible con- flagration added its ravages to those caused by the pestilence, and consumed some of the finest quarters of that city. Amidst so many disasters, Titus not only acted the part of a good prince, but also evinced the affection of a tender father for his dis- tressed children. In order to repair, as far as possible, both public and private losses, he spared neither the treasure of the empire, nor his own money. He parted even with his jewels and the ornaments of his palace, to afford the sufferers every alleviation in his power Unfortunately he reigned only two years, and died at the age of forty-one (a. d. 81). Many believed that his death had been pro- cured, or at least accelerated by his wicked brother Domitian, It was so generally and so deeply lamented, not only in Rome, but also in the provinces, that each family seemed to have lost a ?!on or a father. DOMITIAN.— A D. 81— 96. It is scarcely possible to find a more striking contrast in the cha- racter and dispositions of two successive princes, than is presented oy Titus and Domitian. The new emperor, far from imitating the vir- A. D. 81 — 96.] DOMTTIAN. 57 lues of his deceased brother, abaiuioned himself to the most degra- ding excesses. He was careful, however, to conceal his wickedness, until he had, like other tyrants, confirmed his authority among the people, by several acts of justice and a prudent management of pub- lic affairs. The first and most distinguished personage that had to suffer from his suspicious policy, was Julius Agricola, the Roman governor of Great Britain. This illustrious man had completed the subjugation of that country,* more by mildness and prudence, than by the terror of his arms. He continued to govern it with great honor, when Domi- tian, jealous of his glory, recalled him to Rome, and repaid his emi- nent services with coldness and ingratitude. Agricola, for feai of giving umbrage to the tyrant, withdrew from public life. He died some years after, excluded from dignities and public employments, but preserving pure and entire the fame of his talents and virtue. His life was written by his son-in-law, Tacitus, in a manner which does honor to both the conqueror and the historian. Most of the other wars during Domitian's reign, those especially which he conducted in person, proved unsuccessful: he was defeated by the Germans; concluded a disgraceful peace with the Daciansj and yet had the impudence to boast in Rome of his pretended ex- ploits, for which he caused a triumph to be decreed. His only vic- tories were over helpless insects; he frequently shut himself in his chamber, and spent his time in killing flies with a sharp bodkin Hence a certain Vibius Crispus being asked if any one was with thp emperor, aptly replied: "Not so much as a fly." Under this capricious tyrant, capital punishments were renewed, for a variety of pretexts, against the first personages of the state. Nor were pretexts ever wanted. To be rich, or of noble extraction, was a crime. An equal danger awaited those who enjoyed honors, and those who enjoyed them not; above all, conspicuous virtue and merit, almost infallibly proved the ruin of their possessors: this was the case particularly with Christians. Domitian excited against them the second general persecution, in which he spared neither his own relations, nor the advanced age of St. John the Evangelist. This venerable apostle was brought from Ephesus to Rome, and plunged into a caldron of boiling oil, from which he came forth unhurt, and even stronger than before.f The emperor then banished him to the small island of Patmos in the Archipelago, where the holy apostle wrote his Apocalypse, or Book of Revelations. After the death of Domitian, he returned to Ephesus, wrote his Gospel at the reques'. * Not including Scotland, which never was entirely subd led ; much less Ireland, which was not even attacked by the Komans. t TertuUian, De prcescrijjt, c. 36. — St. Jerom, lib. advers Joviniamm 58 MODBRN HISTORY. [PART 1. of the bishops of Asia, and died towards the end of the first century, beicg nearly a hundred years old. Not less impious than wicked, Domitian wished, after the example of Caligula, to be considered and honored as a god; to have teraplea erected in his honor, and victims to be sacrificed to his statue. Next to this arrogant and sacrilegious pride, refined cruelty seemed to be hia predominant characteristic; he tooK pleasure in making people suffer, and in feasting his eyes with the sight of their torments. Not satis- fied with putting to death a multitude of senators, he resolved to frighten the others, and for this purpose, contrived a scheme worthy of a tyrant. He invited them to supper, and as they arrived had them conducted from the gate of the palace to an apartment hung with black, where every thing presented the image of death. By the glimmering of melancholy lamps, they perceived as mauy cof- fins as there were guests, with the name of each inscribed in large characters. A number of boys, whose skins were darkened, danced around the room; in the meanwhile, a mournful silence interrupted only by Domitian reigned in the assembly, and every one believed that his last hour was come. When their terror was at its height, the emperor dismissed them all with presents, Domitian, by such scenes, was perhaps desirous to make others feel the excruciating anguish of mind which he himself experienced. Every thing gave him offence ; and he was continually tormented with the fear of being surrounded by assassins. He had the gallery in which he usually walked, overlaid with stones which reflected ob- jects like a mirror, that he might see those who should attempt to attack him from behind. He entertained unceasing apprehensions, especially, it is said, of a certain day (the eighteenth of September), and of a certain hour of that day (eleven o'clock in the morning). But nehher his apprehensions, nor the precautions which he took to screen himself from danger, were able to prolong his life: that very day and hour, he was murdered in his apartment by some ofli- cers of the palace, who either knew that their own death had been decreed by him, or otherwise dreaded he effects of his resentment. Some historians relate that he had been forewarned of the impending evil; and also that the famous magician, Apollonius Tyanensis who was then at Ephesus, knew the emperor's death at the moment it happened, and announced it in these words: " Strike, strike the ty- rant." But this account seems rather uncertain. Many have drawn a parallel between Domitian and Nero; but a niore exact comparison might be made between the former and Tibe- rius, whose sulhness of temper, malice, cruelty and dissimulation, he possessed in a high degree, as Tillemont justly observes,* He died * Histoire des Empereiirs, vol.^ II. p. 64. A. D. 96 — 117.] NERVA — TRAJAN. 59 in the sixteenth }ear of his reign, and the forty-fifth of his life (a. d. 96), and was the last of those emperors who have been called the Twelve Caisars. NERVA— TRAJAN.— A. D. 96—117. Nerva, a venerable old man, was unanimously proclaimed em- peror by the army, the senate and the people. During his reign of only sixteen months, though not always successful, he did much good by his personal exertions, and still more efficaciously promoted the interest of the empire, by the selection of Trajan for his colleague and successor. He died shordy after (a, d. 98). Trajan was a native of Italica or Seville in Spain, and belonged to a family more ancient than illustrious. Possessed of an excellent con- stitution, an engaging and noble countenance, and great experience added to his natural abihties, he was moreover in that maturity of age which is so desirable for the goverment of a vast empire. He received ihe news of his election, whilst commanding the Roman troops in Germany : this produced no change in his character and conduct He sincerely believed and pubhcly declared himself to be not less bound than the lowest citizen to observe the laws. Other emperors had held the same language; but what Trajan promised to be, that he in reality was. He seemed to retain his rank for the sole purpose of preventing anarchy, and, whenever his prerogatives clashed with the true interest of the people, he diminished them without hesitation. Hence the surname of Optimus was given him by unanimous consent. He carefully attended both to the embellishment of the capital and to the utility of the provinces. In Rome, the famous Trajan Square and Column ; in Pannonia, a bridge, more than three thou- sand feet long, thrown over the Danube; a road uniting, as it were, the two extremities of the empire, and extending from Gaul as far as the Euxine sea; and many other public works and buildings, were striking instances of the grandeur of his views. Fully convinced that haughtiness conciliates neither affection nor esteem, and that condescension can be well allied to dignity, he lived with his people, not as a monarch with his subjects, but like a father in the midst of beloved children. His palace was open to persons of all conditions ; he listened whh patience, corrected with gentleness, and, like Titus, wished no one to go discontented from his presence. As his friends one day represented to him that he carried indulgence and kindness too far; *'I must," answered he '^behave towards every 60 MODERN" HISTORY. [PART 1. one, as I desiied that an emperor should behave towards me, when 1 was a private citizen." With regard to rniHtary talents, Trajan was, beyond comparison, the greatest commander of his age, and equal to the most illustrious generals of antiquity. Vigilant and indefatigable, he marched on foot, even when emperor, at the head of his troops, and in this man- ner passed over vast tracts of country, without using horse or chariot. Equally attentive to reward noble actions and maintain strict dis- cipline, he constantly encouraged both by his own example. So great a prince easily revived the warlike spirit of the Roman legions. He led them first against the Dacians, and triumphed twice over their king Decebalus, who had imposed a sort of tribute on Do- mitian. Passing afterwards into Asia, he subdued Assyria, Mesopo- tamia, and other countries the names of which were before unknown at Rome. These conquests however proved more brilliant than solid: the new subjects of the empire availed themselves of the first oppor- tunity to shake off the yoke. Trajan himself beheld the first success of their efforts, and was unable to check it, either for want of time, or on account of other obstacles. He died at S'elinontes in Cilicia, whilst on his journey to Rome, after having reigned nearly twenty years (a. D. 117). No Roman emperor left a greater reputation for princely ability and goodness. For a long time after his death, the best wish that the Ro- mans believed they could offer to any new emperor, was that he should be happier even than Ceesar Augustus, and better than Tra- jan. His goodness however did not extend to the Christians, who were again persecuted under his reign. Moreover, his private life was far from being blameless : on the contrary, his intemperance and infamous debaucheries, together with many other instances of the same kind, show well what we must think in general of the greatest raen that paganism produced, even those who have been most admired for their virtues. Besides duintillian and Juvenal, Avho flourished about this time, the most celebrated writers that lived under Trajan, were, Tacitus the historian and Pliny the Younger. Both of them were raised to emi- nent dignities, and yet acquired less glory from their high station than from their integrity and eloquence. They frequently pleaded at the bar, and were ahvays admired; Tacitus, for the gravity and nobleness of his diction; Pliny, for his elegance and facility, which were so great that he could, speak five or six hours in succession, without fatiguing any one but himself. He has left ten books of Letters, and a Panegyric of Trajan. The writings of Tacitus consists chiefly of Histories and Annals relating to the first emperors of Rome; several books of his works are lost, to the great detriment of Latin literature. A. B. 117—138.] ADRIAN. 61 Tacitus and Pliny, instead of entertaining any feeling of jealousy Qgainst each other, were, on the contrary, sincere and intimate friends. Public opinion made no distinction between them, and in social inter- course, the name of the one could scarcely be mentioned without tne name of the other. It once happened that Tacitus, being at a public game, had a long conversation on literary matters with a foreigner sitting by his side, and who did not know him personally. At last, the foreigner asked him who he was. " You know me," said Taci- tus, ''from my writings." "Then you are Tacitus or Pliny," said the stranger; showing by that sudden reply, that the mere mention of literature was associated, at that epoch, Avith the names of these ivvG illustrious writers and friends. In their time, a young boy, called Valerius Pudens, obtained, at the age of thirteen, the premium of poetry at the Capitohan games (a. d. 106). ADRIAN.— A. D. 117— 13S. Like Trajan, Adrian, his nephew and successor, united with a wretched life in private, great abilities for government ; but his con duct was far different from that of his predecessor. Being as great a lover of peace as Trajan had been of military glory, he reduced the Roman dominions to their former limits, and abandoned all the con- quests lately made in countries situated beyond the river Euphrates. His utmost care, during the whole of his reign, was to preserve peace with the neighboring nations. To obtain this desired end, he employed two principal means. The first, rather an impohtic one, was to induce, by considerable presents, the tribes of Pannonia and Germany not to attack the empire. The second, much more worthy of a great prince, was to keep the troops always in good order, and ever ready to oppose and defeat every attempt of invasion. For that purpose, he took upon himself the task of visiting all the camps of the legions scattered throughout tne em- pire, in order to examine in what manner discipline was every where observed, and what was the state of the arms, engines of Avar, fortifi- cations, ammunition, and, in a word, of every thing connected with the military department. During these visits, the emperor required that an account should be given him of the conduct of the officers and soldiers; which being done, he appropriately distributed praises and reproaches, rewards and punishments; and, in the appointment of mihtary offices, granted nothing to favor, but every thing to virtue, merit and experience. 6 62 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. He animated the military exercises by his vigilance, his presence, his example. He suppressed with inexorable severity whatever pro- moted or favored efieminacy among the troops, and showed in his own person a perfect pattern of mihtary discipline, living with the soldiers as one of them, using the most common food, wearing a plain dress and carrying heavy arms, braving the inconveniences of the various climes and seasons, and walking, with his head uncovered, thrt,ugh the snow of the Alps, as well as through the burning sands of Africa. By these efficacious means, Adrian revived the strictness of ancient discipline among the troops, making himself however very dear to them by his kindness, affability and opportune favors. He paid great attention to the welfare of the soldiers, especially of those ad- vanced in years, whom he honorably dismissed in due time, and of those who were sick, whom he was accustomed to visit in their tents or lodgings. The civil affairs were not less carefully attended to by Adrian. It was one of his maxims, that an emperor ought to be like tiie sun, which by its regular course illuminates and vivifies all the regions ol the earth. He spent many years in traveUing through the various provinces of the empire, reforming abuses, redressing grievances, appointing good governors, and inflicting punishments on those who had abused their power. He likewise, by his own example and as- siduity, improved and facilitated the administration of justice, having for this purpose caused a collection to be made of the best ancient laws, and himself having enacted wise statutes against fraudulent bankrupts and a variety of other disorders. His conduct towards the senate was habitually full of deference and respect; towards the people, condescending but firm; towards the allies and subjects of the empire, kind and hberal. He remitted the whole sum due to the exchequer (nine hundred miUions of ses- terces, nearly twenty-five millions of dollars), and publicly burnt all the books and records which might afterwards be produced to revive that debt. This action of Adrian did him great honor, and was justly celebrated by inscriptions and monuments. On the whole, although his government proved fatal to some illustrious persons whom he harassed and persecuted, it was highly beneficial to the state. On many particular occasions, the emperor manifested a wonderful cle- mency, and regard for truth. One day a poor woman cried out to him: " Csesar, hear me and give me justice." Adrian having an- swered that he had no time; '^ vvhy, then, are you our emperor?" asked the woman. The prince was struck, but not offended by, this bold question; he stopped, and listened to her complaints. How- ever, he took care not to be imposed upon by artful petitioners. A A. D. 117—138.1 ADRIAN. 63 grey-headed man asked him a favor which was refused. Some time after, the same man appHed again to Adrian for the same purpose, with his hair blackened. The emperor pretended not to recognize him, and coolly dismissed him, saying: " What you ask, I have al- ready refused to your father." Adrian had remarkable talents and a very extensive knowledge. He was well versed in mathematics, history, natural philosophy, etc., and deserved to be considered one of the best grammarians, orators and poets of the age. His mind was acute and sagacious; he could at the same time write, dictate to a secretary, give audience to and converse with his friends. His memory also was astonishing. He remembered every thing that he had seen or read, and forgot neither the nature of the affairs which passed through his hands, nor the places in which he had been, nor the names of the persons with whom he had conversed. After reading a book, he could repeat it from beginning to end; nay, if a list of names confusedly mixed together was recited to him, he would repeat tkem all without a mistake.* His genius was not less elevated than extensive, and always prompted him to undertake great things for the splendor and utility of the state. No prince seems to have surpassed him in the number and magnificence of public buildings. Such were, in Rome, the bridge and castle now called St. Angelo; in Asia, the new city of Jerusalem; in Great Britain, a wall eighty miles long and extending from sea to sea, to protect the Roman colonies against the attacks of the Scots; and in Gaul, the splendid amphitheatre of Nismes, which however is ascribed by some to the emperor Antoninus Pius, who derived his pedigree from that city. The tranquillity of Adrian's reign was disturbed only by a revolt «f the Jews. Many of this infatuated people had already perished under Trajan for the same cause. Being checked for a time, but not subdued, they again rose in arms, and committed horrid cruelties in Syria and Palestine, under the conduct of a certain Barcochebas, who called himself the Messiah; for, after having rejected the true Messiah in the person of our Saviour, the Jews Were easily led to follow impostors. Their rebellious obstinacy obtained, as it merited, a total and irreparable overthrow. Adrian sent against them nu- merous troops under the command of Tinnius Rufus and Julius Severus, two able officers, who greatly distinguished themse.Tes m this war. The forces of the rebels were so formidable, and their animosity so • See Spartian, Dion Cassius and Aurelius Victor, apud Crdvier, Ilisioire das Empereurs RomainSf vol. VIII. p. 63. 64 MODEKN HISTORY. [PART 1. great, that the Roman generals did not tliink proper to engage them in a regular battle. They had recourse to a war of skirmishes and detached parties, hunting the Jews as they would wild beasts, and pursuing them to death in every part of the country. This manner of warfare proved so successful to the Romans, that, within the space of three years (from a. d. 134 to 136), they took and destroyed nioe hundred and eighty-five towns, besides fifty fortresses. In these partial engagements, five hundred and eighty thousand Jews perished by the sword only ; it was impossible to tell the nClmber of those who fell victims to fire, sickness, or starvation. All who escaped death were dispersed throughout the empire, and sold in public fairs like horses and cattle. In no country were they subsequently greater strangers than in Judea, and particularly in Jerusalem, which was rebuilt shortly after under the name of ^lia Capitolina ; they Avere forbidden not only to dwell in it, but even to approach withm three miles of its walls. From that tmie, the Jews have been scattered through the various parts of the globe, without any country belonging to them ; without kings and princes of their own descent; without laws and magistrates of their own; mingled, but not confounded with other nations; flat- tering themselves with the vain expectation of a future Messiah. whilst, from the very words of their sacred records, he must have ap- peared upon earth eighteen hundred years ago. From that time, we Eee them exposed, during the long course of ages, to numberless dis- asters and calamities, but always preserved by the mighty hand of God, that they may ever continue visible examples of his justice, and unexceptionable witnesses to the truth of the Ancient Scriptures, in which we read alike our claims and their condemnation. Adrian did not long survive the conclusion of this second Jewish war: being attacked with the dropsy, and tormented by violent pains, he wished to end his life by the sword or by poison ; but the constant vigilance and care of his adopted son Antoninus prevented the deed. He then vented his fury against several members of the senate, whom he condemned, without any legal cause, to capital punish- ment; but these also Antoninus saved from death, by telling them to conceal themselves. Adrian, however, still continued to take part in the affairs of the state. At length, he retired from Rome to Baia in Campania, where he observed no regimen, ate and drank whatever pleased him, without any regard to his situation, remarking that "the multitude of physicians had killed the emperor." He died at the age of sixty- two, after a reign of twenty-one years (a. d. 138). As he had, towards the end of his life, rendered himself odious to the senate, it Avas with great difficulty that Antoninus obtained for him the usual honors which attended imperial obsequies. A. D. 138 — 161.] ANTONINUS PIUS. 65 The truth is^ Adrian neither deserved much regret, on account of his many private vices and some acts of tyranny, nor however did he merit the violent resentment of the senate, considering the habitual mildness, wisdom and prosperity of his government. It is highly probable that his memory would have obtained greater praise, had he been the immediate successor of Domitian. It was an unfavorable circumstance for his public character, that he came to the throne after Nerva and Trajan, and immediately before Antoninus Pius and Mar- cus Aurehus, the most excellent emperors of pagan Rome. Although literature Avas not so flourishing under Adrian as it had been during the two preceding centuries, still it produced some cele- brated writers, viz. the Latin historians Justin and Suetonius; the Greek historians Arrian and Plutarch, and the renowned philosopher Epictetus. Adrian himself wrote on different subjects,'and even on his death-bed composed verses expressing his conviction of the im- mortality of the soul, and the fears which he entertained respecting his future destiny. ANTONINUS PIUS.— A. d. 138—161. The family of Antoninus was originally from Gaul, but he himself was a native of Italy. Being chosen by the late emperor to be his successor, he proved himself in every respect worthy of this exalted station. When the demise of Adrian put him in possession of the sovereign power, the whole empire seemed to be exulting with joy ; nor did this extraordinary esteem entertained for Antoninus suffer any diminution during a reign of more than twenty-two years. The surname of Pins was given him, to perpetuate the remembrance of his tender affection for his adopted father, his family, and all his sub- jects. What he had hitherto been in private life and in inferior em- ployments, that he continued to be when seated on the imperial throne; mild, generous, affable, listening with patience to every one, granting all that was reasonable and just, and returning good offices for insults and ingratitude. Thus when, on occasion of a conspiracy which was happily detected, he could not rescue its authors from the rigor of the law, he at least put a stop to all inquiries about their accomplices. " I Avould not," said he, '* begin my government with acts of severity ;" adding, with a smile : " It would be both dishonorable and unpleasant to me, to find, upon inquiry, that I was hated by a number of my fellow- citizens." The son of one of the chief conspirators not only was not involved in his father's punishment, but, on the contrary, always 6* QQ MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. found in the emperor a protector and a friend. This clemency of Antoninus, like that of Augustus, produced an excellent effect, and no more conspiracies were formed against a prince who revenged himself in so nobie a manner. The same kmdness and generosity appeared in his conduct towards a Grecian philosopher, by whom he had been shamefully offended. When he was proconsul of Asia Minor, being at Smyrna, he took his lodging in the house of this man called Polemon, who then hap- pened to be absent. Upon his return home, Polemon, instead of finding himself much honored, was highly displeased at seeing his house occupied by the proconsul. He began to utter loud com- plaints, and went so far as to oblige him, in the middle of the night, to seek another lodging. This was a crying insult; yet Antoninus never thought of punishing it otherwise than by innocent raillery. When Polemon afterwards came to Rome, he received him kindly, and ordered an apartment to be provided for him in the palace, say- ing with a cheerful voice: "Let no one be so bold as to expel such a guest, even during the day^ A comedian having also complaine-d that the same Polemon had driven him from the stage — " at what hour," asked the emperor, "did this happen?" "At mid-day,'* answ^ered the comedian. '^ Why!" exclaimed Antoninus, " he onoe expelled me from his house at midnight, and I bore it patiently." Many other instances might be adduced of his surprising meek- ness; it always rose superior to injuries and affronts, yet never dege- nerated into weakness. He employed rigor against guilty persons, whenever good order and necessity required; but then, not to offer, m such circumstances, too much violence to the benevolent mchna- tion of his heart, he found out such expedients for moderating that rigor, as could not by their example be prejudicial to the commu- nity. Thus, for instance, a senator having been convicted of par ricide, as it was not possible to save the life of such a monster, the emperor, not to be shocked by the sight of his punishment, caused him to be transported into a barren island, where he might perish by hunger and misery. Antoninus, both from taste and reflection, was a constant friend of peace. He often repeated this saying of Scipio : " I like better to preserve one citizen, than to kill a thousand enemies." He generally had the satisfaction to enjoy the tranquilhty which he so much desired ; and, not being distracted by the cares of war, he applied himself entirely to the promotion of public and private happiness. His attention was constantly occupied in governing the state, as a good and diligent father governs his children and household. Fai from making exactions, he obhged his intendants, under severe penal- ties, to levy the taxes with moderation. To the many calamitous A. D. 138 — 161.] ANTONINUS PIUS. 67 events which happened during his reign, he appUed all tlie reme- dies in his power, and showed in numberless instances that he had nothing so much at heart, as to lighten the burden of his people. This excellent prince was also favorably inclined towards the Chris- tians, so much exposed at that time to pubhc hatred. The prejudice* of the pagan world against their religion, and the calumnies with which they were blackened, continually raised storms against them, and, even under the best princes, led many of" them to martyrdom No sooner was Antoninus, through the eloquent apology of St. Jus tin and other documents, well informed of their innocence, than he endeavored to shelter them from the blind fury of the populace, and from the injustice of magistrates and governors. In a rescript directed to those of Asia Minor, he took the part of the persecuted, ex- tolled their fidelity to God, their courage in suffering death, and turned his praises of their virtues into reproaches against the vices of their persecutors. He concluded the rescript by declaring ihat the Christian name was by no means a just cause of condemnation, and that, if any were brought before the courts upon no other charge, they ought to be acquitted, and their accusers punished. The benefits arising from so excellent a government, were nox confined to the Romans and subjects of the empire : the reputation o^ Antoninus for justice, impartiality and wisdom, gained him a de- gree of authority and influence over the neighboring nations, which be never would have obtained by force of arms. Foreign princes came to pay him homage in Rome; the Indians, the Bactrians, the Hyrcanians, testified their respect for him by solemn embassies. He prevented by letters the Parthian king from invading Armenia ; and the very barbarians near the frontiers frequently chose him as an umpire t-^ settle their claims and differences. It was in these noble occupations that Antoninus spent the whole «9f his reijrn, the blessings of which he completed by the appointment of Marcus- Aurelius for his successor. After a short disease, he died a tranquil death, at the age of seventy-three years (a. d. 161), leaving a name so dear to the Romans, that, for nearly a century, all his suc- cessors added it to their own names : it seemed as if it were impossible, for either the soldiers or the citizens, to acknowledge as emperor any one who should not have some resemblance, were it but a nominal one, with Antoninus. Yet, it would have been infinitely better for bim, if he had left as unblemished a reputation for purhy of life as for wisdom of government; and if his many excellent qualities and princely virtues had been sanctified by the only true religion, whose followers indeed he admired, but whose doctrines he had not the happmess to embrace. 68 MODEKN" HISTORY. [PART 1. MARCUS-AUKELiaS— A. d. 161—180. Marcus-Aurelius considered it his bounden duty to walk m the footsteps of h s predecessor, and to govern the state upon the same principles. Although he was not so firm, prudent, and free from prejudices as Antoninus, yet he displayed the same zeal for the pub- lic good, the same application to affairs, the same moderation and generosity; so that his reign, notwithstanding the vices of Lucius Verus whom he had taken as his colleague, was also a period of glory and happiness for the Romans. About this time, the Parthians invaded Armenia, which they had long since tiireatened. They destroyed the legions which defended that country, and advancing into Syria, filled every place with terror and desolation. Marcus-Aurelius being detained m Italy, took proper measures to repel the invaders. Avidius Cassius, one of his generals, not only defeated the Parthians, but also crossed the Euphrates, and continued his march' as far as the royal city of Seleucia, which he plundered and reduced to ashes. But these brilliant exploits were dearly purchased. The victorious legions, on their return, brought along with them a pestilence which produced so dreadful ravages in the empire, especially in Italy, that more persons were carried oflf by it within the space of a few months, than would have perished during many years of the most disastrous war (a. d. 166). This expedition against the Parthians was followed by another against the Marcomans, the Gluadi, and oiher barbarians, who, driven from the north of 2\sia and Europe by more powerful tribes, or en- ticed by the hope of pillage, were striving to break through the bar- riers of the empire. Marcus-Aurelius went to put himself at the head of the legions, and evinced during the whole campaign a skill and valor which drew upon him general admiration. However^ after many victories, he suffered himself and his troops to be entan- gled in narrow defiles amidst the mountains of Bohemia, where, be- mg surrounded on all sides by the enemy, they were on the point of perishing with heat and thirst. In that extremity, the soldiers of the twelfth legion, all Christians, betook themselves to prayer, and pre- sently the clouds gathered, and an abundant rain fell, which refreshed the Romans; whereas hail, thunder and lightning spread confusion among the barbarians, and enabled Marcus-Aurelius to gain a com- plete victory (a. d. 174). On this occasion, his army saluted hira Imperator for the seventh time, and the name of Tkundenng waa given, or confirmed to the twelfth legion. This prodigy, which pagan writers themselves relate,* and which • Dion Cassius, Capitolinus, Claudian, etc. apiid Tilleraont vol. ii, p. 370 A. D. 180—193.] COMMODUS — PEETINAX— DIDIUS. 69 is still seen engraved on the Antonine pillar at Rome, stopped for a time the persecution that the Christians were then suffering; the war however had but little interruption, and lasted till the end of the emperor's life (a. d. 180). He died at Vienna, near the Danube, having obtained a great reputation for political and military acquire- ments, and still more celebrated foi his moral virtues, which were not however without a mixture of many great failings, viz. his reli- gious bigotry, his weak connivance at the vices of his son Commo- dus and of other persons under his control, etc. He had Uved fifty- pine years, and reigned nineteen. Besides being a great emperor and general, Marcus-Aurelius was also an estimable author: he has left twelve books of wise maxims on the rules of morahty. COMMODUS— PERTINAX— DIDIUS JULIANUS.— a. d. 180—193. CoMMODus succeeded his father on the throne, but followed a very different line of conduct. A monster, rather than a man, he seemed to have no relish but for atrocious deeds of every description. He imitated Nero in his worst and basest inclinations, and surpassed Do- mitian in his cruelties, except that he did not persecute the Christians. After having gone on in this way for many years, his unrelenting thirst for blood at length caused his own death, by inducing the persons of his household to poison and strangle him, on the last day of the year one hundred and ninety-two. On the following day, Pertinax, a venerable man, whose uncom- mon merit amply compensated for the lowness of his extraction, was chosen and unanimously acknowledged emperor. Under him, the paternal and firm administration of Antoninus began to revive. In a very short time, the laws were again put in force, the debts were paid, the public revenues increased without laying new taxes, and power- ful encouragements were given to agriculture, as the surest means of prosperity both for the state and for private families. In a word, the sound policy of Pertinax, seconded by his ability and experience, promised lasting as well as universal happiness; but these flattering hopes were soon blasted. At the end of three months, the prretoriaa soldiers incensed at his exertions for the restoration of military discip- hne, slew him in his palace (a. d. 193). After this outrage, the rebels were not ashamed to expose the em- pire to sale at public auction. Purchasers were found, and after bid ding for some lime, Didius Julianus, aiich senator, carried the point. 70 MODERN ITTSTORY. [PART 1. by offering twenty-five thousand sesterces (about six hundred and twenty-five dollars) to each praitorian. This shameful transaction drew universal contempt upon Didius. Severus, commander of the Roman troops in Illyria, caused himself to be proclaimed emperor by them, and suddenly departing, crossed the Alps, and made his appearance in Italy, before the news of his march had arrived. As he approached Rome, Didius showed noth- ing but weakness and hesitation. This unfortunate man saw him- self gradually abandoned by the praetorians, betrayed by the Italic co- horts, and condemned by the senate. His death, after a precarious reign of sixty-six days, delivered Severus from a contemptible rival SEPTIMIUS SEVERUS.— A. d. 193—211. Two other and much more powerful competitors were yet in his way, Clodius Albinus and Pescennius Niger, men of great valor and reputation. Like Severus himself, they were, after the death of. Perlinax, proclaimed emperors in their respective governments, Albinus in Great Britain, and Niger in Syria. Severus was deter- mined to destroy them both ; still, not to be engaged at once in two dangerous wars, he made first an agreement with Albinus, by which he granted him a sort of participation in the imperial authori- ty, and prepared to attack Niger. After a short stay in Rome, Severus departed for the East with numerous and well disciplined troops. Niger had on his side the legions of Syria and Asia Minor. From the character, firmness and ability of the two rivals, a war of long duration was anticipated; it was however terminated in a few months by three battles, in which all the troops of Niger were overcome, not by Severus in person, who was then occupied in besieging Byzantium, but by his lieu- tenants. The last battle was fought near the town of Issus in Cili- cia, on the same spot where Alexander the Great formerly gained a splendid victory over the Persians. The victory of Severus was also complete. Niger lost twenty thousand men, and saw no other resource than to retire beyond the Euphrates; but being overtaken in his flight by some cavaliers of the victorious party, he was slain by them, and his head carried to Severus (a. d. 195). The conqueror inflicted heavy penalties on the towns which had embraced the party of his opponent; especially on Antioch, the cap- ital of the East, and on Byzantium, which surrendered to him, only after a long siege and a most obstinate resistance, fie deprived the former of its privileges ; the latter he almost entirely destroyed, A. D. 193 — 211.] SEPTIMIUS SEVERUS. 71 Such private individuals as had been seen most devoted to the same cause, were also treated with great rigor; some suffered capital punishment; others lost their estates, or were condemned to pay enormous taxes. Motives of policy, and the fear of rendering himself too odious, prevented Severus from carrying severity farther. He published an amnesty for the common soldiers, and would not suffer a pompous inscription in honor of Niger to be erased, saying it was rather fit that it should remain, to let the world know what an enemy he had conquered. The main object which he now had in view, was to destroy Albinus, and thus obtain exclusive possession of the throne. Albinus, on his part, was little satisfied with the inferior qualification of Caesar, and seemg himself supported by a powerful army and a respectable portion ot the Roman senate, he publicly assumed the title of Augustus. This bold step was precisely what Severus desired ; his artful policy made him always endeavor to have appearances on his side, and per- mit his adversary to become the aggressor. He was returning from the East to Rome, when he received information of the open defec- tion of Albinus. Severus did not fail to improve thi.= favorable oppor- tunity of inveighing against his rival, and having him declared a public enemy ; from that moment, the two competitors openly marched against each other; Severus from Maesia, and Albinus from Britain. It appears that the intention of Albinus was to penetrate into Italy, and cause himself to be acknowledged in Rome. Severus, fully aware how essential it was for his interests to prevent the execution of any such design, detached some bodies of troops to guard the pas- sages of the Alps, and followed with all possible speed, at the head of the main portion of his army. He set the example of invincible fortitude in the greatest fatigues. No difiiculty of the jroads waj able to stop his march ; he was bare-headed, disregarded snow and frosts, and both by words and actions, transfused into the breasts of others the ardor with which he himself was animated. He was thus enabled to prevent the entrance of his enemy into Italy, and to come up with him near the city of Lyons in Gaul. The quarrel between these two fierce rivals was now about to be decided. The two armies, including at least one hundred and fifty thousand combatants, were equal in number, in courage, and in the advantages of being headed by their respective emperors. All these circumstances contributed to render the battle terrible, and to leave the victory lor a long time doubtful. The left wing of Albmus was broken, and the fugitives were pursued to their camp ; but lus right wing obtained at first a considerable advantage. Tho 72 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. legionary soldiers of whom it was composed, had dug before them a great number of ditches, and covered them over shghtly \vith clay^ so artfully that no one could perceive the snare. To draw the ene- my into it, they pretended to be afraid, and hurling their javelins? from afar, immediately retreated. The stratagem was successful : the troops of Severus, anxious to come to a close engagement, and despising their adversaries, advanced without any precaution ; but they were stopped at once by an obstacle as formidable as it was unexpected. Coming to the place which was overspread with clay, the earth sunk under their feet, and the whole first line fell into the ditches. As the lines were very close, the second had no time to re- trace their steps, and fell upon the first. Those who followed, ter- rified at this, drew back hastily, and beat down their companions be- hind them; so that the whole left wing of Severus was throw^n inio utter confusion. In this extreme danger, Severus, with the imperial ^uard, flew to the assistance of his disheartened troops. But at first, tar from reme- dying the evil, he saw even his praetorian soldiers scattered and cut in pieces, and had a horse killed under him. This served only to animate him the more: rallying some of the fugitives, and putting himself at their head, he fell, sword in hand, upon the enemy, deter- mined to conquer or die. His little troop, animated by his example, hewed down all before them, without distinction of friend ot foe. Numbers of fugitives were thus forced to return to the charge; and the conquerors, who, through eagerness, had already broken their ranks in order to pursue their advantage, were now compelled to fight iu their own defence. The battle was renewed with fresh fury : but the victory still re- mained doubtful, till Loetus, the commander of the horse of Severus, decided the fate of the day. He had dechned engaging in the begin- ning of the fight, perhaps through a perfidious design to let the two emperors destroy each other, in order to set up afterwards for himself. But when he saw that fortune began to declare for Severus, being sensible of the danger to which his unwary inactivity exposed him he fell upon the flank of the enemy, whilst Severus attacked them vigorously in frpnt. Unable any longer to keep their ground, they fled, and took shelter within the city, together with Albinus, who either died of his wounds, or killed himself in despair. By this com- plete but bloody victory, Severus was left (a. d. 197) Avithout a com- petitor; having, in less than four years, destroyed three emperors, Didius-.Tulianus, Niger and Albinus. He made a terrible use of his prosperity, and showed himself more cruel and inexorable than ever. After Albinus had expired, his vio- lent enemy spurred his horse on the dead body, which he caused tu A. D. 193 — 211.] SEPTIMIUS SEVERUS. 73 remain exposed until it was devoured by dogs, and sent the head to the senate, with alarming tiireats against those who had followed the party of that unfortunate general. His wife, children and friends, all those who could be discovered to have been his leadi^ig partisans, were put to death. Many towns in Gaul and Spain had to mourn the loss of their worthiest citizens, especially of such as were rich, in whom their wealth was too frequently their only crime. By means like these, Severus amassed immense treasures, of which he made use chiefly to gain the affection of the soldiery by favors and largesses. IIis return to Rome with his victorious troops, spread ter- ror through he city, and in a few days forty senators fell victims to his revenge. On this occasion, Severus received a striking lesson from his younger son Geta, who was then only eight years old. The boy, having heard his father declare how he would revenge himself, seemed greatly concerned. In order to quiet his apprehensions, Se- verus said that the persons who had been marked out for death, were enemies, of whom he v/as going to deliver him. Geta then asked how many there might be of those unfortunate people. Being told the number, he grew still more pensive, and again asked whether these unhappy men had any relations or friends alive ; and, as he was answered that most of them had several; "Alas!" replied he, ** there will be then more persons sorry for our victory, than will par- take of our joy." Severus was struck by a remark at once so judicious and humane; hut the prefects of his guards urged him to execute the proposed slaughter, and his eldest son, Caracalla, proposed that even the children of their enemies should be put to death with their fathers. ^ Upon which Geta, with a look of indignation, said to him: "Dis- posed as you appear to be to spare the life of none, you would also be capable of killing your own brother." Words evincing extraor dinary sagacity, and which were afterwards too well verified. One of the two prefects of the guards just mentioned, was Plau- tian, a proud and an ambitious man, whose fate was exactly similar to that of Sejanus under Tiberius. Like him, he obtained great in- fluence, which he most shockingly abused, until, by his insolence, he brought about his ruin, and that of his friends and family. In the mean while, the Christians every where acknowledged and faithfully obeyed Severus. For this reason, and also from a moiive of personal gratitude towards one of them who had cured him of a : dangerous sickness, the emperor for some time treated them kindly. A mistaken policy induced him afterwards to change his conduct in i theirregard. The followers of Christ had multiplied exceedingly, in consequence of the long peace they had enjoyed since the reign ot . Marrus-Aurelius. The miracles whicn Almightv God daily wrought 7 74 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. by their hands, and the spectacle of their extraordinary vjrtue, drew over to them great numbers of proselytes * " We fill," said Ter- tuUian to them at that very time, '* your cities, your towns, your senate and your armies; we leave you only your temples and thea- tres. '^f So rapid an increase threatened the downfall of idolatry This was probably, together with the clamor of the heathens, the chief consideration which induced Severus to renew the persecution against the Christians. At first, permitting the magistrates to execute the former laws on this subject, he afterwards expressly authorized their conduct by a new edict issued in the tenth year of his reign (a. d. 202). Then the persecution became general, and countless numbers received the crown of martyrdom. The most illustrious of those martyrs were St. Irenseus, bishop of Lyons, and St. Leonides, the father of Origen who afterwards became so celebrated for his genms and learning. Being at that time but seventeen years old, Origen, in a moving letter, exhorted his father to die courageously for the faith of Christ, and he himself, through the desire of martyrdom, would have gone to present himself before the persecutors, had no! nis mother compelled him to remain at home by concealing his clothes. The fire of persecution raged for many years throughout the em pire: but, far from destroying the Church, it served only to purify her, and make her shine with greater lustre. The Christians pre- sented themselves with courage before the tribunals, and viewed with calmness the racks and other instruments prepared for their torture, ready to meet death in its most cruel shapes. The more of them were immolated, the more their number increased; the sight of these wonderful examples of fortitude, and of the miracles which the Al- mighty was pleased frequently to perform on those occasions, hading many of the spectators, sometimes the very executioners and judges, to embrace the Christian religion. Leanling also and eloquence concurred with virtue and miracles m the vindication of Christianity. In order to refute polytheis:n, the holy priest Clement "of Alexandria made deep researches in every • These undoubtedly, with the assistance of inward grace, were the only causes of the stupendous diffusion of Christianity; and such persons as have, like Gibbon, attempted to prove the contrary, have proved orily the perv^crseness of their own views and scepticism. Nothing short of a con- stant and special interposition of God could have induced men, buried as tliey were in vice and idolatry, to enibrace a religion so contrary to all pas- sions and vices, so destitute of all human support, so violently attacked by all the powers of earth, by calumnies, vexations, tortures and death. Since Christianity was not only unaided, but even opposed by all natural and hw man causes, most certainly its propagation must be attributed to a cause mpernaiural and divine. + TertuU. Apolog. c. 37. A. J). 193 — 211.] SEPTIMIUS SEVEKUS 75 part of heathen mythology, and successfully used them as mighty weapons against its doctrines. Minutius Felix, a celebrated law- yer at Rome, wrote an excellent dialogue setting forth, with great force of reasoning and purity of style, the absurdities of idolatry and the excellency of the Christian doctrine. But the most powerful work published at that time was the Apologetic of TertuUian, a priest of Carthage: in it, he gave a deadly blow to paganism, by exposing its manifold errors; and victoriously refuted every calumny broached against the Christians, by exhibiting the purity of their lives, their piety towards God, their mutual charity, their love of their enemies, their horror for every vice, their patience and con- stancy in suffering all kinds ot torments, even death itself, for the sake of virtue. This was plainly showing the injustice of the perse- cution which they suffered. Notwithstanding these and other acts of tyranny exercised by Severus, he is not to be reckoned among such abominable princes as we have frequently had occasion to mention. With religious fanati- cism and an inflexible spirit of revenge he united many great and laudable qualities, viz., frugality, vigilance, firmness in the govern- ment, prudence in the management of the public revenues, assiduity and equity in the administration of justice, in fine, a wonderful fore- sight and sohcitude in providing even for the future wants of the people. When he died, there was in the public granaries a quantity of wheat sufficient to support the inhabitants of the capital for seven years; and all Italy was supplied with oil for five years. The predominant characteristic of that emperor was his activity and warlike spirit, and the most striking feature in his life is to be found in that rapidity of conquests which rendered him almost equal to Julius Caesar. Besides his exploits in civil wars, he made two suc- cessful campaigns against the Parthians and other nations of the East, one after the defeat of Niger, and the other after the ruin of Albinus. In the latter especially, he was so often victorious as to ac- quire the surname of Parthicus Maximus. He failed only in the siege of Atra, a well fortified town near the Tigris, which had also re- pelled Trajan; but he conquered many other towns in Assyria and Mesopotamia; and in particular, secured to the Romans the posses- sion of the important city of Nisibis, which became the strongest bul- wark of the empire on that frontier. The last expedition of Severus was made in the north of Great Britam against the Caledonians, whom he drove back to their moun- tains. In order to confine them within due limits, and preserve the Roman colonies from subsequent invasion, he raised a wall similar to, but more solid than the intrenchment of Adrian, and, like it, ex- tending from one sea to the other. Some of its ruins are yet to be 76 MODERN" HISTORY. [PART 1: seen between the Friths of Forth and Clyde, and excite the astonish ment of the traveller. As he was going one day to conclude a treaty with the barbarians^ in presence of both armies, a sudden cry of horror was heard; Seve rus turned, and beheld his eldest son, Caracalla, in the act of advanc- ing, sword in hand, to stab him from behind. The outcry stopped the arm of the unnatural son, and his father, without uttering a word, resumed the negotiation of the treaty. Having returned to his tent, he sent for Caracalla, and, in the presence of Papinianus and Cursor, his chief attendants, reproached him with his heinous crime. Then presenting him with a drawn sword, he added: "If the desire of reigning impels you to imbrue your hands in the blood of your father, satisfy your desire here, rather than in the sight of all, both friends and enemies." No other punishment did he inflict upon him. But neither the just reproaches nor the paternal indulgence of Severus produced any feeling of re- morse in Caracalla. On the contrary, he persisted in his detestable intention, and, besides requesting some of the physicians of the court to accelerate his father's death, diligendy circulated seditious princi- ples among the soldiers; insinuated, for instance, that it was a dis- graceful thing to obey an old man who was infirm, attacked with the gout, and unfit to command them any longer. Reports like these produced a revolt in that portion of the army, the direction of which his too indulgent father had confided to him. Severus, assembling the legions, passed sentence of capital punishment against the ac- complices of his son, not however against the young prince himself, and even, it appears, granted at this time pardon to all, at their ear- nest entreaties. Then addressing himself to them with a loud voice and a majestic air : ** You see now," said he, " that it is the head which governs, and not the feet." Shortly after, he fell dangerously sick in the city of York, and the most painful reflections upon the atrocious conduct of Caracalla preying upon his mind, he felt that his days were drawing to a close. He then called his two sons to his bed-side, and declared his inten- tion of leaving the empire to be possessed by them both, exhorting them at the same time to mutual forbearance and concord (an advice which became as fruitless as it was necessary) ; he added that, hav- ing Pound the state in disturbance and confusion, he left it quiet and respected. Some moments before expiring, the emperor cried aloud : " I have been all things, and all things are nothing; and I no where found solid content and happiness." Having ordered the urn which was to contain his ashes to be brought tQ him, he addressed it m these terms : "Thou wilt contain him for whom the whole earth was too A. D. 211 — 222.] CARACALLA — MACRINUS, ETC. 77 little." In order to terminate more speedily his acute and increasmg pains, he asked, it is said, for poison; but no one being willing to comply with his desire, he took so great a quantity of food that he was suffocated. This happened in his sixty-sixth year, and about the eighteenth of his reign (a. d. 211). He left behind him the reputation, not of a good, but, in many respects, a great monarch, and, next to Trajan, the most warlike of the Roman emperors. Such was the natural activity of his mind, that, even at the last moment of his life, he was asking whether there was any thmg to be done, Making due allowance for the peculiarities necessarily occasioned by the difference of time, place and other circumstances, there is not perhaps, in all history, a single prince who so strikingly resembles the great conqueror of our own age, Napoleon Bonaparte. Not that Napoleon was so revengeful and inexorable as Severus; but we see in both the same active and warlike genius; the same boldness in un- dertaking, and quickness in executing; the same talents and firmness in government; the same ardor for the advancement of their famihes; and, in fine, the same indifference for the fives of other men, when their own interest and ambitious views were to be promoted. CARACALLA— MACRINUS—HELIOGABALUS.— A. d. 2n.— 222 The death of Severus would have caused litdeor no regret, had he not been succeeded by so great a monster as his son Caracalla, whose name was derived from a Gallic vestment which he was fond of wearing. He commenced his reign by the murder of his brother Geta, and continued, for six years, through such a course of de- baucheries, cruelties and rapines, which Europe, Syria, and Egypt successively witnessed, as fully to deserve the name of second Cali- gula, which is given him by some historians. He was murdered at the age of twenty-nine years, by Martialis, a centurion, whom he had offended by an act of injustice; but the chief, though secret leader of the plot, was Macrinus, the commander of the imperial guards, whom the cruel emperor had frequently threatened with death. This revolution happened in the year 217, and was quickly followed by anotner. Macrinus experienced little difldculty in obtaining the place of Cara- calla; but he did not, by his government, conciliate the affection and esteem of the people: on the contrary, he drew upon himself the contempt of the troops, by concluding a disgraceful peace with the Parthian king, and earned their hatred, by refusing them the favors 7* 78 MODERN HISTORY. ["PART 1. which they required. A new revolt broke out in favor of young Bassianus, otherwise called Heliogabalus (from his being a priest of the sun), who now claimed the sceptre as being a relation, by his mother, to the Severian family. Both parties had recourse to arms, and an engagement took place, which proved fatal to Macrinus : he was defeated, overtaken in his flight by the conquerors, and deprived not only of the empire, but also of his life, after a reign of only four- teen months (a. d. 218). All the worst tyrants hitherto mentioned seemed to revive in the person of Heliogabalus. Never was there a more effeminate and des- picable, a more dissolute and wicked prince. Every day added to his extravagances, and increased the public indignation. Sensible of the danger to which he was exposed, and unwilling to receive death from any other hands than his own, he prepared silken strings and golden swords, for the purpose of ehher stranghng himself or cutting his throat, if necessary. Moreover, a tower Avas built for him, sur- rounded by a pavement of precious stones, in order that, should he be obliged to precipitate himself from the top, he might at least have his head and limbs bruised in a splendid manner. All these silly precautions proved useless. Heliogabalus was slain in a privy by the soldiers, and the multitude seizing upon his body, dragged it through the streets of Rome, and threw it into the Tiber (A. D. 222). He had reigned nearly four years, and was succeeded by his cousin Alexander Severus, whose reign presents a spectacle as pleasing as that of his predecessor was execrable. ALEXANDER SEVERUS.— a. d. 222—235. A NATURAL inclination to virtue, fostered by an excellent education^ rendered Alexander Severus one of the most amiable and accom- plished princes mentioned in the annals of the world. Justice, good- ness and generosity were his favorite virtues. He often repeated this maxim, which he had learned from the Christians: do to all men, as you would have all men do to you; he caused it to be engraved on the walls of his palace, and made it the rule of his conduct. He also frequently paid religious homage to our Saviour, whose image he kept m a sort of chapel, together with those of Abraham, Orpheus, and other signal benefactors of humanity. This is indeed a singular col- lection of names; but the fact serves at least to show the happy in- clination of that prince to honor virtue, wherever he found it sincere and active. A. D. 222— 235] ALEXANDER SEVERUS. 79 Although Alexander was scarcely fourteen years old, when the sovereign power devolved upon him; his administration was truly ad- mirable, almost from the beginning. For this he was partly indebted to the prudence of his mother Mammaea, and to a numerous counsel composed, by her care, of the most virtuous senators, the best officers in the army, and the ablest jurisconsults in the state. Aided by such counsellors, and urged on by his own excellent dispositions, Alexan- der commenced a reign worthy of being proposed as a model to all future sovereigns. The whole empire needed a thorough reformation ; but innumera- ble were the difficulties to be encountered in the attempt. Alexander was not frightened by their number and magnitude, but immediately set about this great work with vigor. Besides degrading and dismis- sing all the iniquitous judges and bad officers appointed by Helioga- balus, he made an exact review of all the orders of the state, of the senate, the knights, the tribes and the armies, expelling from them all bad and corrupt members. No guilty person was spared. Even the crimes of those connected with the emperor by the ties of con- sanguinity or friendship, met Avith condign punishment; on such oc- casions, he used to say that the commonwealth was dearer to him tlian his family. No criminal did he punish with greater severity than governors who oppressed the people, and judges who suffered themselves to be bribed. So great was his abhorrence of these persons, that, when he beheld any of them, he could not restrain his indignation, but was obliged, as Lampridius relates, to throw up bile; and his lingers, oy a sort of natural impulse, were directed towards the face of the criminal, as if to tear out his eyes.* Nor did he stop at mere me- naces : great severity was used, in order to repress the abuse. He treated with no less rigor those who made an improper use of the favor which they enjoyed near him, and betrayed his confidence. A certain man, called Vetronius Turinus, who frequently approached the emperor, received from different persons large sums of money, under the false pretence that the benefits of the court were granted through his means; this conduct he called selling smoke. Having been detected in this shameful proceeding, Alexander ordered that he should be tied to a post, about which a tire was made of green wood, so that the smoke might suffocate him ; and a herald cried out during the execution: *'The seller of smoke is punished with smoke." An example like this was certainly well calculated to check the evil; but, the more efficaciously to root it out, Alexander directed all his attention to a good choice of governors and of magistrates. None could * Lamprid. m vil. Alexandr. Sever. 80 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. obtain public employments, who had not first merited his esteem and that of the people:* it was even a maxim with him, that they who shunned dignities, were the most worthy of them. He highly approved the custom used in the Christian Church, of publicly proclaiming the names of those who were to be promoted to the priesthood, in order that any objection against them might be made known, and seriously examined. Alexander adopted this plan, declaring beforehand the names of those whom he intended to appoint governors of the pro- vinces. But at the same time, not to excite against them the fury of envy and mahce, he insisted that the accusations should be of a se rious nature and well proved j otherwise, t lie accusers were punished as vile calumniators. "With equity and justice, the young emperor united admirable cle- mency. Being well informed that a senator of illustrious birth, named Ovinius Camillus, had set on foot a plot to raise himself to the sovereign power, Alexander sent for him, thanked him for his willingness to share the troubles annexed to the croAvn, and began to treat him as his colleague. At that time, a military expedition was to be made against some barbarians who had revolted. Alexander offered the command to Camillus, and, on his refusal, with prudent generosity invited him to partake at least in the glory of the cam- paign. They started together on foot. Camillus, being soon tired, was advised by the emperor to take a horse for the rest of the jour- ney, and afterwards to make use of a carriage. These proceedings, so flattering in appearance, mortified him so much, that he abdicated his honors, and hastily returned to his country seat, where Alexan- der permitted him to live unmolested. In the conduct of this prince with regard to the troops, prudence and firmness, kindness and severity were admirably blended. He kept them under strict discipline, marched at their head, used the same food and clothing as themselves. However, whilst he required of them an exact performance of their duties, he was afl'able to all, and paid particular attention that they should not want any thing, especially in time of sickness. By these means, Alexander won the unbounded affection of the soldiers, who considered him as their father and brother, and ob- * Among the virtuous men in whom Alexander chiefly reposed his con- fidence, must be reckoned the celebrated liistorian Dion Cassius, a native of Nice in Bithynia, and well known at Rome for his manifold 'merits, which had raised him under the preceding emperors, to various offices of state, even to the consulship. By Alexander Severus ho was entrusted with tlie government of many important provinces, and appointed consul a second time. After having travelled, and collected documents during ten years, ne Wrote a complete Roman History in eighty books, many of which are en- tirely lost, whilst many others are extant only in extracts and abbreviations A. D. 222 — 235.] ALEXANDER 'SEVERUS. 81 tained a surprising influence among them, notwithstanding his youth. Once particularly, being surrounded with discontented ifgionary sol diers who expressed their displeasure on account of a punishmem inflicted on some of their number, he endeavored first to appease their murmurs by exhortations and menaces. As they persisted in their clamors, Alexander said to them, with a tone of indignation : " Citizens, retire, and leave your arms." The astounded legion laid down their arms, took off the military insignia, and retired in silence. But, after having thus vindicated his authority, the emperor, moved by their supplications, received them again into favor, and ever after enjoyed their inviolable fidelity and attachment. Another important object of Alexander's care was the public trea^ sury. He managed the revenues of the state with so much wisdom, that he was enabled to reduce the taxes imposed by Heliogabalus, in the proportion of thirty to one; and still, far from abolishing the usual favors granted to the soldiers and the people, he, on the con- trary, seemed continually occupied in bestowing benefits. Liberality regulated by prudence formed one of the most remarkable features in his character. He took particular pleasure in giving to the poor, especially to those who, having a certain rank to support, were des- titute of the means of so doing, and had not fallen into distress through their own fault. In a word, history bears him the glorious testimony, that he never suffered a day to pass without performing some act of humanity. It should not then appear astonishing, that the veneration and love of the Romans for Alexander was carried to a sort of enthusiasm. Whenever he had to depart from Rome on some distant expedition, he was accompanied to a distance by the whole senate and all the people, who manifested by abundant tears, their affection for so good a prince and their grief for his departure , he hiniself mingling his tears with theirs. When he returned, he could scarcely advance through the streets, on account of the immense multitude of people that surrounded him and cried aloud, with transports of joy : "Rome is happy, since she sees Alexander alive." The chief occasion that made him leave the capital for a time, was an important event which had just happened in the East. By a sud- den revolution, the Parthian empire, which civil feuds had previously weakened, fell, after a duration of four hundred and fifty years, and the ancient Persian monarchy was re-established by a certain Artax- erxes, son of Sassan, and first king of the dynasty of the Sassanides ''a. d. 22G). This great change was of no advantage to the Romans, as the Persians gave them, for many centuries, as much trouble al least, as the Parthians had done before. In the very beginning of their new monarchy, ih&y attacked Mesopotamia and Syria with an 82 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. army of one hundred and twenty thousand horse, and seven nundred elephants carrying wooden tower*?, each containing many archers. However, I'orniidable as they were, the Persians could not resist the intrepidity of the Roman legions commanded by their emperor in person ; and, after suffering considerable loss, they were compelled to retire. This is the most probable account given of that expedition, which was no sooner over, than Alexander, upon information of the disturbances excited by the Germans in the Wtst, speedily returned to Rome, where he received the honors of a splendid triumph. At his departure from the East, he left a sufficient number of troops to prevent or repel any subsequent invasions of the enemy. These and other troops employed by Alexander in the Persian war, were not only brave in the field, but likewise so well trained by good dis- cipline, thai in their marches and in their whole deportment they ra- ther resembled so many bodies of grave senators : hence every one nighly extolled this excellent prince, for the great benefits which he conferred both on the armies and the subjects of the empire. Far more difficult, and terribly fatal in the result, was the attempt fo establish the same good order among the legions of Gaul and Ger- many. Alexander had now repaired to those countries, for the pur- pose of driving back the Germans beyond the Rhine. Accustomed as some jf these legions were to disorder and licentiousness, they could not bear the idea of being subjected to the yoke of strict dis- cipline. Wherefore, by the secret direction of Maximin, one of their generals, they attacked the young emperor in his tent; whilst he, perceiving that all resistance would be useless, covered his face with his cloak, and yielded himself an easy victim (a. d. 235). Alexander lived nearly twenty-seven years, and reigned thirteen: a prince, equal, if not superior, to the most renowned amon^ the Ro- man emperors. Trajan, Marcus-Aurelius, and some few others, per- formed perhaps greater exploits, or were more successful in some re- spects: but we should remember that they had reached a more mature age, when they mounted the throne, than Alexander when he*was precipitated from it. No greater misfortune could have befallen the empire, than his premature death : it was followed, during fifty years, by so many treasons, civil wars and other calamities, that the third century has derived from them the name of iroii-a>fe. Of the many emperors who reigned in that perijd until Diocletian, scarcely one escaped a violent death. As they were generally raised to the throne by the arbitrary choice of the soldiery, we will comprise most of them under the head of Military Usurpers. A. D. 235 — 208.] MILITARY USURPERS. 88 MILITARY USURPERS.— A. d. 235—268. As it was not known, at the time of Alexander's death, that Maxi- tnin had been its chief promoter, the whole army, through esteem for his natural bravery, saluted him emperor.. He was of Gothic extraction, a native of Thrace, and had been a shepherd before enhst- mg among the Roman troops. He possessed an enormous size, be- ing, we are told, about nine feet high, and stout in proportion : nor was his strength less astonishing than his stature. He could, without assistance, move a wagon heavily laden, and with a blow of his fist break the teeth or leg of a horse. Hence he was compared with Milo the Crotonian, Hercules, and Anti3eus, those prodigies of strength in pagan antiquity ; like them also he was an extraordinary eater and drinker, requiring, it is said, forty pounds of meat and seven gallons of wine for his daily allowance. This great bulk of body was accompanied in Maximin with that brutaUty which is its almost necessary appendage in an uncultivated mind. He was, it is true, an excellent warrior, and gained many bloody victories over the Germans; but we may say without exag- geration that he shed still more blood throughout the empire, by per- secuting the Christians, whom his predecessor had on the contrary favored, and by putting to death numbers of persons, who either Knew the meanness of his extraction, or by their eminent merits ex cited his jealousy and fears. The people also suffered very much from his rapine and extortions. Having, by so many acts of tyranny, provoked universal hatred, Maximin was murdered by his own troops, near Aquileia, after a reign of three years (a. d. 238). Four competitors, whom the senate nad opposed to him, viz., the two Gordians in Africa, and Maximus with Balbinus in Rome, also perished about the same time, by the fury of the soldiery. After thqm, Gordian the younger or the third, reigned six years. His youth and virtuous inchnations, his prosperous government, and great victories over the Persians, made him a living copy of Alexander Severus. He resembled him likewise in his death, being murdered by the orders of Philip, the prefect of his guards (a. d. 244). Philip reigned five years, after which he was slain in battle, whilst endeavoring to repress the revolt of Decius, one of his generals (a. d. 249). He governed with prudence and courage the empire that he had acquired by crime, and was favorable to the Christians. l^ecius was on the contrary one of the most cruel enemies of Christianity, and the seventh general persecution, of which he wa8 84 MODERX HISTORY. [PART 1. ihe author, made an incredible number of martyrs. Nothing else of great miportance is known concerning this emperor, except that, having undertaken a war against the Goths, which was at first sue cessful, he afterwards rashly entangled himself in marshy places, was entirely defeated, and perished with his son and nearly his whole army (a. d. 251). Gallus, a Roman general, whose treacherous advice was probably the cause of this disaster, remained in possession of the sovereign power, but kept it only one year and a half. He carried on the per- secution commenced by Decius, and, like him, miserably perished, ^milian, who succeeded him, was put to death by his own troops, after a still shorter reign of four months (a. d. 253.) The imperial dignity was now, by the unanimous consent of all the orders of the state, conferred on Valerian, a venerable senator, who had greatly distinguished himself in inferior employments. He con- tinued to evince great prudence in common and easy affairs ; but for matters of importance, his talents and mind proved inadequate: in the seventh year of his reign he suffered a signal defeat from the Persians, and owing to his own imprudence, was taken prisoner (a. d. 260). King Sapor treated him with the ulmost indignity. When he wished to get orr horseback or to enter his chariot, he forced the unhappy emperor to bend his body and present his neck as a stirrup. Whilst riding, he compelled him to run by his side, though loaded with chains. In fine, after several years of the most ignominious and cruel captivity. Valerian was not only put to death, but also flayed, and his skin, painted red, was suspended in a Persian temple, to serve as a lasting monument of the disgrace of the Romans. The heathens wondered at the dreadful fate of Valerian; but the Christians easily perceived in it the hand of God falling heavily upon a prince who, contrary to his own judgment and inclination, had cruelly persecuted them. For, although he knew their fidelity, and was naturally good and moderate, superstition and evil advice in- duced him to command the eighth general persecution. It lasted three years and a half, and was extremely violent, especially in Afri- ca, where, among others, St. Cyprian, archbishop of Carthage, was beheaded; and in Rome, where the holy deacon St. Lawrence was burnt by a slow fire. Ecclesiastical historians relate of this illustrious martyr, that, when one side of his body was burnt, he himself re- quested that the other side also should be presented to the fire ; and adding, after a few moments, that he was now sufficiently roasted^ he calmly expired in the midst of his horrid torments. Not Valerian only, but the whole empire, so obstinately bent on shedding the blood of the Christians, had to undergo the punish- ments inflicted by divine justice. Both the capital and the provinces A. D. 268—270.] CLAUDIUS II. 85 were visited by calamities of every description. Within the space of a few years, not fewer than twenty pretenders* were seen exert- ing themselves to obtain possession of the sovereign power. The frontiers were attacked and the Roman territories invaded by the Per- sians, the Sarmatians, the Germans, the Goths and other barbarians. In fine, earthquakes, famine and pestilence made frightful ravages from one extremity of the empire to the other, and particularly in Rome, where the plague sometimes carried off five thousand persons in one day. These various calamities happened under the reign of Gallienus, an indolent and unworthy prince, who was killed by some of his officers (a. d. 268). So many disasters seemed to indicate the approaching downfall of the empire 5 but it was saved from destruction, and even restored to its ancient splendor, by a long series of great emperors, the first of whom, according to the order of lime, was CLAUDIUS XL— A. D. 268—270. A HAPPY union of moral, civil and military acquirements, raised Claudius II to an equality of merit with Trajan. He incurred, it is true, the guilt of sharing in the murder of his predecessor; but after- wards, nothing appeared in him but love of justice, true patriotism and heroic magnanimity. Notwithstanding the shortness of his reign, he displayed these princely virtues on several occasions, and, when circumstances required, he did not hesitate to practise them against his own interest. Thus, Avhen a woman came to complain of the wrong she had formerly sufffered from a certain officer named Claudius, the emperor, understanding that the allusion was to him- self, did not take offence at the boldness of the complaint, but pre- sently repaired the wrong, and, by so doing, evinced his readiness to sacrifice every selfish feeling to the rule of equity. * The common opinion says thirty, but it is contradicted by facts and by fair calculation: not more than eighteen or twenty of these pretenders can be found in the exact enumeration of them given by the most accurate his- torians, viz., Tillemont, vol. in., note 1 on Galliams; Cr<^vier, Hist, des Emp. Rom. vol. x., p.p.SoS and 441. It must also be observed that tliename tyrant by which they are commonly designated, is not in its usual accep- tation, equally applicable to all; several of them having been highly com- mendable for their endowments and moral virtues. This name, as here used, w^as applied to men who, having assumed the title and power of emperors, died without being acknowledged as such in Kome and by the Ronate. 8 86 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. This excellent prince reigned just long enough to destroy a hostile fleet of two thousand sail, and an army of three hundred and twenty thousand Goths who had invaded Macedonia. He attacked them first near Naissus, in a battle which lasted long and was obstinately disputed. The Romans gave way in several places ; but at length, a detachment of their troops going round by roads which seemed im- passable, fell upon the rear and flanks of their enemies : this unex- pected attack decided the victory, and the Goths were forced to re- treat, after having lost fifty thousand men. They rallied however their shattered forces, and hazarded a new batde, which proved as disastrous as the former. Those who escaped, were closely pursued by Claudius ; yet such was the fierceness and valor of the barbarians, that, even in the deplorable condition to which their army was now reduced, they once more rallied, and rendered doubtful the event of the battle. Falling with desperate courage upon the Roman infan- try, they threw it into confusion, cut part of it into pieces, and would probably have completed its destruction, if the horse of Clau- dius, wheeling round, had not compelled their wearied troops to retire. The sad remnant took refuge in the passes of mount Hsemus, and fell victims to famine and disease. In the meanwhile, the Gothic fleet, after scouring the seas, re- turned loaded with booty to Macedonia, in order to rejoin the land army. But that army was already dispersed, and the arrival of the sea- soldiers at that fatal shore, served only to increase the disasters of their nation. The ships, being deprived of their defenders, were easily destroyed ; and the men, unable to penetrate into a country in which every thing opposed them, found themselves compelled to disband and take different directions. Most of them were slain, or carried off by distempers ; so that of this incredible multitude of barbarians, only a few stragglers escaped. After this exploit, one of the greatest ever performed by any Ro- man general or emperor, Claudius was attacked by the plague which had broken out among his troops, and died at Syrmium in Pannonia (a. d. 270). His death caused inexpressible grief among the people, as well as in the army. No sooner had he expired than the legions of lUyria chose as his successor, Aurehan, one of his bravest gene- rals, who immediately rv^ent to Rome to take possession of the eove reign authority. A. D. 270—275.] AURELIAN. 87 AURELIAN.— A. D. 270—275. The military feats of Aurelian had been great before, they were Btill mere conspicuous after his accession to the throne. He began by checking the inroads of numerous hordes of Germans, Vandals and other barbarians, who had advanced so far as to invade Italy it- self; then after a short stay m the capital, he departed for the East, where the state of affairs demanded all his attention. A powerful monarchy had been recently founded there by the illus- trious queen Zenobia, a woman of distinguished abihties. Naturally possessed of great talents, she improved them by study and apphca- tion ; became perfectly acquainted with history, on which she herself wrote a book; and besides the Syriac, her native tongue, knew also the Egyptian, Greek and Latin languages, which she had learned at the school of the celebrated rhetorician Longinus. After the death of her husband Odenat, prince of Palmyra, who- had been a constant friend and useful ally to the Romans, Zenobi-a took advantage of the many calamities of the empire, to invade its fairest provinces in Asia and Africa, and having formed to herself an extensive monarchy, she maintained her independence for five or six years with great honor aad success. It was against this princess that Aurelian now directed all his efforts ; one year was sufficient for him to put an end to her prosperhy, not- withstanding the many obstacles that he had to surmount. On his way from Rome to the East, he was obliged to fight against numerous bodies of barbarians who pillaged the country; his progress was also arrested in Asia Minor by some towns, which sided with Zenobia; Tyana, in particular, seemed disposed to offer a vigorous resistance. Aurelian, exasperated at this hindrance, swore in his anger that he would not leave a dog alive in that audacious town; a resolution highly pleasing to the soldiers, who rejoiced beforehand in the hope of obtaining great booty. After the city was taken, the troops en- treated Aurelian to keep his oath. "I have sworn," replied he, "not to leave a dog alive in Tyana: kill, then, if you will, all the dogs, but I forbid you to do any harm to the inhabitants." This generous answer, though it disappointed cupidity, obtained universal applause. In the meanwhile, Zenobia, with numerous troops, had come for- ward to oppose the further progress of Aurelian. After two actions which took place near Antioch, and the result of which was unfa- vorable to her cause, the two armies, amounting each to about seventy thousand men, engaged in a general battle under the walls of Emesa. At the first onset, the Paimyrian cavalry gained a con- 88 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. eiderable advantage over that oi the Romans: being more numerous, and tlie Romans having made a movement in order to extend their front and prevent themselves from being surrounded, the enemy^s horse, which attacked them at that very instant, easily broke their disordered ranks, and put them to flight. But, yielding too much to their ardor, the conquerors caused the rest of their army to lose the fruit of their good fortune, by occupying themselves exclusively in the pursuit of the fugitives. The Roman infantry, whose strength was invincible, seeing the other Palmyrian soldiers deprived of the assistance of their cavalry, made a vigorous attack upon them, and put them in disorder. The cavalry of the Romans, reanimated by the success of this attack, rallied and enabled Aurelian to gain a de- cisive victory. The enemy had suffered considerable loss. Zenobia, unable to keep the field any longer, shut herself up in Palmyra, her capital, where she was soon besieged by the Romans. Palmyra, a town fa- mous in antiquity, had been founded by Solomon,* and had gra- dually increased in prosperity and wealth, till, under Odenat and Zenobia, it reached a surprising degree of splendor, as its magnificent remains still testify. The situation of that city in the deserts of Sy- ria, between the Roman and Persian dominions, rendered it a very important place ; the more so, as it was well fortified, and abundant- ly supplied with troops, arms and engines of war. By these means of defence, Zenobia sustained the siege with a courage proportioned to the vigor of the attack, so as to excite the admiration of Aurelian himself. " Truly incredible,'* he said in a letter which he then wrote, " is the quantity of darts and stones which she pours upon us; she does not leave us one moment of rest, day or night." Unhappily for the besieged, bodies of auxiliary, troops upon which they relied for assistance, were defeated by Aure- lian, and provisions began to fail in the town. In this extremity, the queen set out during the night, to go and implore the aid of the Per- sians. But the emperor, being informed of her escape, sent a de- tachment of cavalry, which overtook her, and made her prisoner as she was about to cross the Euphrates. She was immediately con- ducted to Aurelian, and appeared before him with an undaunted air; to his question, why she had been so bold as to oppose the emperors of Rome, this witty and skilful princess answered ; " You I consider as a real emperor; but Gallienus and such as resembled him, I never thought worthy of that title, nor could I see any reason why I should not maintain my power against them, and refuse to submit to their control." • II Paralip. viii. 4. A. D. 270—275.] AURELIAN. 89 On the news of the capture of the queen, Pahnyra surrendered, and heing well and generously treated by the conqueror, appeared to hnn a secure conquest. However, the submission of the Palmyrians lasted little longer than the time of his presence among them : after his departure, they revolted and slaughtered the Roman garrison. As soon as the news of this treacherous act reached the emperor on hia return to Rome, he hastened back with his victorious troops, took Palmyra a second time, and putting the inhabitants to the sword, reduced the town to a state of desolation equal to its former glory. As for Zenobia, she was led to Rome, and obtained from her con- queror an honorable retreat, where she spent in quiet the remainder of her hfe. Besides the eastern provinces, Aurelian also recovered Gaul and some other countries of the West, which, from the time of Galhenus, had been either occupied by the barbarians, or formed under their governors into separate states. Most of those exploits were per- formed with surprising rapidity (a. d. 273). Having thus pacified the whole empire, and restored it to its an- cient limits, Aurelian applied himself to establish order in every de- partment of the public administration. He took many excellent measures for that purpose ; but he did not sufficiently curb the vio- lence of his temper which prompted him to acts of cruelty : this milexible rigor, after causing the death of many, became the occasion of his own ruin. Suspecting Mnestheus, his secretary, of malver- sation, he threatened him with severe punishment ; and it was well known that punishment usually followed his threats. Mnestheus, who probably knew himself to be guilty, resolved to escape the dan- ger by every means in his power, even the most unlawful. For this end, he devised the following horrid plot; counterfeiting the emperor's hand-writing, which he had long practised, he drew up a proscription list of the principal officers of the army, and found means to bring it to their notice. The officers did not suspect the forgery. Alarmed at their supposed danger, they concerted together, and, during the march of the troops whom Aurelian was then leading against the Persians, they fell upon him at a moment when he was accompanied Dy a small guard, and despatched hitn with their swords, in the fifth year of his reign and sixty-third of his age. All his m»jrdere:rs were punished, Mnestheus first, and the others sooner or later; and though Aurelian was little regretted by several persons, the people and the anny seemed to vie with each other in honoring the memory of a prince who, notwithstanding the sliort duration of his government^ had rendered highly important services to the empire (a. d. 275). The Christians did not at first experience any particular rigor from Aurelian ; he rather seemed disposed to treat them according to the 8* 90 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. .aws of equity, as he did his other subjects. But his leehDgs being afterwards, through tiumari considerations, changed in their regard, the ninth general persecution brolte out, and though short, made many martyrs. INTERREGNUM— TACITUS.— A d. 275—276. The death of Aurehan gave rise to an event almost unexampled in history, a protracted contest of mutual deference between the army and the senate. During the space of six or eight months, they seve- ral times referred to each other the election of a sovereign ; and, what is stiU more extraordinary, affairs remained perfectly quiet all that time. At last the senate, yielding to the wishes of the troops, named Taci- tus, one of its own members, a man of great wisdom and experience, and a descendant, so at least he considered himself, of the illustrious historian of the same name. He accepted the dangerous dignity with a reluctance which appeared as unfeigned, as it was reasonable and just; for, notwithstanding the equity of his administration and the success of his exertions against the barbarians, he was after a very short reign, killed by a rebelHous soldiery. Some relate How ever that he died of a fever. PROBUS.*— A. D. 276—282. The legions of the East now raised to the throne their commander Probus, a general of uncommon merit, and who, to genuine probity signified by his name, joined a surprising courage and greatness of soul. A prince of this character was peculiarly fitted for the time and circumstances in which he lived. The empire was attacked on all sides by the barbarians: Probus defeated them all, and drove them back beyond the frontiers; the Germans especially feh the invincible strength of his arms, by the heavy losses which he inflicted on then nation. In a single campaign, he destroyed four hundred thousand of them, and those who escaped, were so much intimidated, that, for several years, they did not venture to renew their incursions. * We purposely omit mentioning in the catalogue of Roman emperors, Florianus, a brother of Tacitus, who took the purple and vras acknowledged by a considerable portion of the troops, but for some weeks only. The same had also happened, in the beginning of the reign of Aurelian, to Quin- tillus, a brother of Claudius II A. D. 276—282.] PROBUS. 91 Probus resolved also nj cneck the pride of the Persians, and march ing into the East, stationed his troops upon the mountains of Arme- nia, from which the enemy's country was seen. Here he received ambassadors from the Persian king Varanes ; the audience which they obtained, recalls to mmd the plainness and magnanimity of the Romans of ancient times. Probus was seated on the grass, and eat- ing his dinner, which consisted of old peas and salt meat, when the Persian ambassadors arrived in his presence. *'l am," said he to them, **the Roman emperor; go, and tell your master, that if he does not, on this very day, bind himself to repair the damage which he has done to the Romans, he will see, before the end of the month, every part of his kingdom laid waste, and as bare as my head is." At the same time, he took off his cap, to let them see his head which was entirely bald. He added that, if they wished to eat, they were welcome to a part of his dinner ; if not, they must leave the camp without delay, their commission being executed. The king of Per- sia, alarmed at this news, hastened in person to the camp of the Romans, and concluded the treaty on the conditions laid down by the emperor. Not long after this, Probus, to prevent the soldiers from remaining idle, made them drain a marsh near Syrmium in Pannonia. They revolted, and killed this most excellent emperor, whose loss was seri- ously felt and very justly regretted by the whole empire. For, among all the princes that ever sat upon the throne of the Csesars, it would be difficult to name one superior to Probus. Though always success- ful in war, he had recourse to arms through necessity only, preferring honorable peace to military glory. As moderate perhaps as Marcus- Aurelius, he was more fit for war; as a general, at least equal to Aurelian, he was milder and more gentle in his disposition ; always attentive to the happiness of his subjects ; always engaged in useful undertakings, and in endeavoring to make the labor of his soldiera conducive to the advantages of peace. During his reign, a space of about six years, he built or repaired seventy cities, and formed a great number of excellent generals, several of whom successively be- came emperors after him, viz., Carus, Diocletian, Maximian-Hercu- les and Constantius-Chlorus. The empire, raised from its declining state by Claudius II and restored to its former glory by Aurelian, attained under Probus its greatest splendor ; and, had not the crime of the soldiers shortened his days, he might lavc revived the fortunate age of Antoninus or of Augustus. 92 MODEKISr HISTORY. [PART 1. CARUS AND HIS TWO SONS, CARlNuS AND NUMERIAN. A. D. 282—284. After the death of Probus in 282, Carus, the commander ol the praetorian guard_, was judged by the soldiers worthy of filling his place. He reigned sixteen months,, during which he found sufficient time to overthrow the Sarmatians in a great battle, and, besides de- feating the Persians also on different occasions, took some of their principal cities, and carried terror into the very heart of their empire. He intended to pursue his advantage further, but was killed, accor- ding to common report, by a thunderbolt, whilst in his tent near the river Tigris. He left two sons, Carinus and Numerian ; the former, a profligate and brutal, the latter, a gentle and learned prince, and so affectionate to his father, that he lost his sight by weeping for the death of Cams. Both seemed to have mounted the throne only to be assas- sinated ; Numerian, by his father-in-law, whilst he was borne in a Utter; and Carinus, during a battle, by one of his officers. DIOCLETIAN AND MAXIMIAN; AFTERWARDS CONSTANTIUS-CHLORUS AND GALERIUS.— a. d. 284—306. Diocletian had no share in the murder of his predecessors ; but, upon the unanimous choice of the array, he wilUngly occupied their place, for which his high office in the army seemed to have fitted him. Shortly after his accession, he associated to himself in the go- vernment of the state, Maximian, surnamed Hercules, a greater war- rior than himself, though not so skilful a pohtician. Both of them sustained, by their victories against the surrounding barbarians, the majesty and reputation of the empire ; Great Britain, however, was severed from it for ten years under the skilful usurper Carausius and nis successor Allectus. But the hostile tribes of Pannonia and Germany seemed to be mul- tiplied by their defeats, and meditated new invasions. In order to oppose so many enemies with greater facility and success, it was resolved by the two emperors, that each one of them should take an assistant, with the inferior title of Caesar. The choice of Maximian fell on Constantius-Chlorus, a man still more worthy of esteem for his equity, wisdom and liberality, than for his noble extraction and great ability in arms. He ruled with admirable prudence the portion A. 1). 284—306.] DIOCLETIAN, ETC. 93 of the empire allotted to him, namely, Spain, Gaul and Great Bri- tain, which last he reconquered. The barbarians were repulsed by his repeated victories, and the people enjoyed great happiness under his truly paternal government; in return, he possessed the affection of all, as the following anecdote, related by Eusebius, testifies.* Constantius, for fear of distressing his provinces, levied so few taxes, that the treasury was empty. Diocletian, who was of a very different disposition, sent to reprove him for his neglect. Constantius requested the deputies to remain for some days with him, and during that interval, sent notice to the richest inhabitants of the provinces, that he was in want of money ; all hastened to bring their gold and silver to the treasury, which was soon filled. Then Constantius requested the deputies to examine the money, and said to them : " All that you see, has long since been mine ; but I had left it in trust in the hand^- of my people." He then returned the whole to the owners ; being certain of obtaining the same assistance, whenever he would be in want, and justly persuaded that the safest treasure of a prince is the love of his subjects. The choice which Diocletian made of Galerius for his assistant m the East, was not so happy. This Galerius had been a cow-herd, and, though he afterwards passed through the usual military grades, he still retained too much of his origin. In his actions as well as his corpulence, there was much more to inspire aversion and terror, than to conciliate affection and esteem.f His only talent was for war, and even in war he sometimes evinced greater valor than pru- dence: being sent by Diocletian to oppose the Persian king Narses, who threatened Syria with an invasion, he imprudently risked a bat- tle with a small number of troops, and was conquered. The em- peror, who hked nothing so much as prudence, was indignant at a defeat caused by such temerity, and when Galerius returned, wishing to make him feel his displeasure, he let him follow his car a con- siderable way on foot, though vested in purple. Galerius, instead of being discouraged by these affronts, conceived a most ardent desire of effacing the disgrace of his defeat. He suc- ceeded beyond expectation: with a body of twenty-five thousand men, he attacked the Persians in their camp, killed twenty thousand of their numbers, and took a great number of prisoners, with an im- mense booty. Narses, thus deprived of his army and resources by a single blow, sued for peace, which was granted him upon the cession of several provinces (a. d. 297). * Eusebius, iri viUl Constant, lib. I. c. 14. t Erat corpus inoribus congruens, status celsus, caro ingens, et in hor- rendam mai^nitudinein dil}usa et inllata. l)ciii(iue ct verbis, et actibus. ct as- pectu, terror! omnibus ac ibrmidini fuit. — Lacianiius,demortepersecut.n. ix. 94 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 1. If Galerius had been humbled by his defeat, he was not less elated with his victory: he from that time assumed a greater share of autno- rity in the government, and chiefly directed his exertions against the Christian religion. His mother, a peevish woman and much devoted to the worship of her idols, had inspired him with a mortal hatred against the Christians, and he left nothing undone to prevail upon Diocletian to persecute them to death. The emperor, naturally mo- derate, for a long time rejected the cruel proposal, Galerius then had recourse to the calumny formerly made use of by Nero in a similar circumstance; by secret orders and management, he caused the im- perial palace at Nicomedia to be set on fire, laid the odious deed to the charge of the Christians, and the better to show his conviction of their guilt, ran away with apparent fright, saying that he did not like to be burnt by those enemies of both gods and emperors. At length Diocletian yielded, and in the year 303, issued his edicts for the tenth general persecution, the most violent and bloody that the Church ever suffered. Racks and fires, boiling oil and melted lead, sharp stakes and burning pincers, in a word the most acute and exquisite torments were employed against the worshippers of Christ, and in every age, rank and state of society, innumerable were the victims of that frightful persecution. A particular account of its enormities belongs rather to Ecclesiastical History. It suffices here 10 say, with Lactantius and Eusebius, both grave, learned and con- temporary historians, that the whole earth, with the exception of Gaul, was a prey to the fury of three wild beasts,* and that it is im- possible to tell how many presented themselves in every city and country, as martyrs in the cause of Christ.f At Nicomedia, where the persecution commenced, persons of every description were put to death : on account of their numbers, whole companies were burned together, while others were cast into the sea or beheaded ; many perished in this manner with their bishop Anthimus. At Tar- sus, Alexandria, Antioch, in Mesopotamia, Pontus, etc., crowds of Christians were likewise tortured in difierent ways. In Thebais, it frequently happened, during the course of several years, that from ten to a hundred persons suffered martyrdom together on the same day. A little before, in the north of Italy, six thousand six hundred soldiers, who composed the Theban legion, chose to be butchered by their companions, rather than renounce their faith. In Phrygia. a whole town, inhabited entirely by Christians, was surrounded by a large body of soldiers, who set fire to it, and all the inhabitants were consumed in the flames, whilst invoking the name of our Savioiir.J In a word, such was the rage of the persecutors, and such the * Lactant. Dt Morte Pers. n. jvi. f Euaeb. Ecces. Hist lib. viii, c. 4 I See note C. A. D. 284 — 306.] DIOCLETIAN, ETC. 95 quantity of Christian blood spilt by them throughout the empire, that they impiously boasted for a time of having abolished Chris- tianity. But they boasted in vain; the Church of Christ stood, under the sword of persecution, as firm and strong as ever, whereas dreadful calamities began to fall on its persecutors. Diocletian had hitherto reigned with great glory, and v(7ith a superiority of pohtical talents that conciUated to him the respect of all his associates in the empire ; but, in the year 304, he lost his heahh, and various misfortunes harassed him and frequendy disturbed his reason. In that state, Galerius advised, or rather compelled him by threats to give up the government, and to quit, together with Maxim- ian, the imperial purple. They did so in 305, and were thus reduced to the condition of private citizens ; whilst Constantius-Chlorus and Galerius became emperors, two new Caesars being appointed to fill their vacant places. After his resignation, Diocletian retired to Salona in Dalmatia, his native country, where he lived eight years longer, amusing himself in the culture of a small garden ; an occupation which he began to pre- fer to the honors of the throne. But life became burdensome to him, when he learned the destruction of his statues and the triumph of Christianity under Constantine. Lactantius relates* that, seeing himself despised and loaded with disgrace, he was in perpetual un- easiness, and could neither eat nor sleep ; he was heard to sigh and groan continuahy, frequently shed tears, and threw himself sometimes on his bed, sometimes on the ground. At last excessive grief and starvation, and perhaps poison, carried him off in the sixty-eighth year of his age. The fate of Maximian was not less wretched. He attempted two or three times, but in vain, to resume the sovereign power which he had abdicated, and even to murder his son-in-law, Constantine. Being detected, he hanged himself in despair. The justice of God, however, no where appeared more visible than in the death of Galerius, who had been the most cruel of these bar- barous persecutors. He was attacked with a frightful disease; the same exactly which, in more ancient times, had afflicted the impious kings Antiochus and Herod Agrippa, for having also waged war against God and his servants. f A..n ulcer corroded and laid open his very bowels. His body became a mass of corruption, and swarmed with vermin : the stench infected, not only his palace, but also the whole neighborhood in the city of Sardica, and was intolerable even to his own servants, as Eusebius testifies.^ His pains were so acute. • De mort. persec. n. 42. f 2 Macchab. ix. — Act. Apost. xii. XEccles. Hist. I. viii. c. 16. 96 MODERN HISTORY. [PART I. as to wring from him the most agonizing cries; nor could any means be devised to alleviate his sufferings : the horrid distemper condnued to increase in violence, till at length it put an end to the emperor's life, in the nineteenth year of his reign. Thus did the persecutors of Christianity disappear from the earth, with the evident marks of the wrath of God upon them. As Con- stantius-Chlorus had not imitated their example, so likewise he did not share in their disasters. If he could not easily prevent all acts of violence in the provinces which were under his jurisdiction, he him- self at least never tormented the Christians ; on the contrary, he al- ways manifested the most favorable dispositions in their regard. When the bloody edicts of Diocletian were brought to him, he feigned at first to be wilhng to put them in execution: assembhng the Chris- tians of his palace, he told them that they must, in compliance with the imperial orders, renounce either their religion, or their employ- ments and dignities. Some indeed were not ashamed to sacrifice spiritual to temporal interest; but the majority appeared fully disposed to lose every thing on earth for conscience' sake. Then Constantius, disclosing his real sentiments, dismissed the former from his service, saying that persons so attached to their own interests, and so treach- erous to their God, would not be more faithful to their prince. But he kept near his person those who had continued firm in their faith, declaring them worthy to be intrusted with the care of his most im- portant concerns. One thing gave him much uneasiness, namely, the absence of his eldest son, Constantine, who having been long before sent to the court of Diocletian as a hostage for his father's fidelity, was unjustly detained there by Galerius, and charged by this wicked prince with a thousand perilous commissions. Constantius, informed of these continual dangers to which his son was exposed, most urgently so- licited his return ; to this, at last, Galerius pretended to consent, by giving the young prince permission to set out on the following day from Nicoraedia, yet resolving at the same time, to find some new pretext for delay. But Constantine, aware of the danger, started at night without the knowledge of the treacherous emperor, and travelled with the utmost haste, taking care to kill or disable all the post-horses on his road, to prevent the possibility of his being overtaken. The fol lowing day, Galerius was transported with rage at the news of his es- cape, and ordered that he should be pursued; both his rage and order were equally abortive: Constantine was already beyond the reach of danger. He jomed his father just in time to close the eyes of that excellent prince, who died at York in Great Britain (a. d. 306). Constantius displayed, in his last moments, the same wisdom and prudence A. D. 284 — 806.] DIOCLETIAN, ETC. 97 which had characterized his whole life. Instead of meeting with any of the catastrophes which befel the contemporary princes, he quietly expired in the midst of an affectionate family, having the consolation to leave behind him a son perfectly worthy of being his successor, and who was moreover destined by Divine Providence to be the first emperor that should make an open profession of Christianity, and give peace to the Church after three hundred years of sufferings. PART II FROM THE ACCESSION OF CONSTANTINE (A. D. 306), TO THE DOWNFALL or THE ROMAN EMPIRE IN THE WEST (A. D. 476). CONSTANTINE THE GREAT.— a. d. 306—337. Possessed of an elevated genius, heroic valor, a noble appear- ance, and a generous heart, Constantino seemed, from the beginning, well qualified to reign over the universe. For some years, however, his authority was confined to Britain, Spain and Gaul : the other provinces were yet under the sway of Galerius and his associates, Licinius and Maxirain II ; to whom must be added the son of Max- imian-Hercules, Maxentius, who had made himself master of Rome and of all Italy. Besides this partition of the empire, which necessarily weakened the forces of each emperor, the dominions of Constantino were the most exposed to the inroads of the German tribes, and particularly of the Franks. He engaged in along struggle against them, and on his part conducted it with great vigor and severity, allowing no quar- ter in order to force them into submission. They were checked for a time; and when they began to meditate new attacks, he sent against them his eldest sou Crispus, who gained a signal victory, and joy- fully returned through snow and ice to offer Jiis father the homage of his first exploit. The Franks, after this severe lesson, remained quiet during the whole reign of Constantine. He had now to contend with more formidable enemies. Maxen- tius, the tyrant of Rome, a prince sullied with every vice had de- clared his hostile designs against him, and was ready to support them by the force of arms, having one hundred and eighty-eight thousand warriors at his command. Constantine had scarcely half that number, and was moreover obliged to leave a part of his army in Gaul, to defend its frontiers against the barbarians. -Aware of this great dis- parity of forces, he began to think of obtaining the assistance of heaven : the dreadful fate of the persecutors of Christianity had al- ready given him some just ideas respecting the true God whom the A. D. 306 — 337. CONSTANTIXE THE GREAT. 99 ChiistiaDS adored ; that God he fervently invoked, entreating him to be his protector, and the Almighty heard a prayer which came from a sincere and an upright heart. As the emperor was marching with his troops into Italy, on a cer- tain day in the afternoon, he saw in the sky, just over the sun, the figure of a luminous cross, with the following inscription : (EN T0YT2 NIKA) In this conciuer. His army, as well as himself, saw the splendid prodigy, which struck all the beholders with aston- ishment.* Constantine was inspired to make a representation of that cross, and to use it as a standard in battle. He accordingly made the famous banner called Laharum, and being thus encouraged by evident marks of the divine protection, confidently commenced the war against Maxentius. He first presented himself before Suza, a strong town at the en- trance of Italy, took it by storm, and then advanced towards Turin. He found there an army waiting in good order and ready to give him battle; a body of horse completely armed after the manner of the eastern cavalry, was its principal strength. Constantine, who knew that these cuirassiers, confined as they were in their armor, could only advance, and that the least motion either backward or to either side was extremely difficult for them, opened his ranks to receive them, and immediately his soldiers, with great clubs, struck down both horses and riders, and killed them all, without losing a single man on their side. The rest of the army of Maxentius was easily and completely routed. Turin received the conqueror with joy; Milan, soon after did the same, and the whole country on the left of the Po, from Turin to Brescia, willingly accepted his laws. His mildness gready served to facilitate his conquests: he was not one of those haughtv conquerors who mark their progress with terror and devastation; on the contrary, the cities which submitted to him had reason to rejoice at their good fortune, as they experienced from him nothing but benevolence and generosity. At Brescia, he was again opposed by a great body of horse; but this also yielded and retreated towards Verona, where a fresh and numerous army had been assembled, by order of Maxentius, under the command of Ruricius Pompeianus, a general of great repute. Constantine, having safely crossed the Adige, did not hesitate to be- siege Verona, and successfully repelled all the attacks made to hinder * The miraculous apparition of the cross to Constantine is placed beyond the reach of reasonable doubt, by the concurring testimonies of Socrates the historian, Sozomen, Philostorgius, etc., but especially of Euscbius, wlio expressly declares that ho had learned it from the mouth of Constantine himself, who confirmed the assertion with his oath. — Euseb. in vitil Con,' itant. lib. i, c. 27, 28. 100 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 2. his approach. Ruricius fearing that the city would soon be compelled to surrender, secretly withdrew, and raising a new supply of troops, returned with them in order to fight Constantine, and force him to abandon the siege. The emperor was, by that means, between the city and an army of enemies coming to attack him in his camp. In this perplexing situation, he formed his plan with equal bravery and judgment, and leaving a part of his troops to continue the siege of Verona, marched with the rest against Ruricius. He had fewer men than his adversary, and was obliged to draw up his whole army in a single line, in order to present a front equal to that of the enemy. But his prudence and valor made him a match for the foe, notwith- standing this disparity of numbers. No sooner had he given the sig- nal, than he threw himself into the thickest of the battle, with so little regard for his own safety, that his principal officers thought themselves bound to complain of it after the victory, and to entreat him, with tears in their eyes, not to expose his life so much in future. The battle having commenced late in the evening, lasted until the night was far spent. Ruricius was killed upon the spot ; his army was destroyed or dispersed; and the besieged city, having no longer any hope, surrendered to the conqueror. The neighboring towns follow ed the example, and the whole country, as far as Rome, submitted to Constantine, who soon appeared at the head of his victorious army, in sight of that capital. Maxentius, who had hitherto remained in Rome, was at last pre- vailed upon to put himself at the head of his remaining legions. He accordingly marched out of the city, and set them in battle array along the Tiber; Constantine, on his side, when he drew near the enemy, arranged his troops as advantageously as possible. During the battle, he displayed his usual skill as a warrior and a general, and was so well seconded by his officers and soldiers, that the nu- merous troops of. Maxentius were broken almost at the first onset. ♦ Such as resisted, were cut to pieces; the rest endeavored to cross the Tiber, either over a bridge or by swimming ; but the bridge being broken by some accident, or by the v/eight and multitude of the fug'i- tives, most of them were drowned, and Maxentius also perished. This happened on the twenty-eighth October (a. d. 312). On the following day, Constantine made his solemn entry into Rome, where he was received with universal applause and exulta- tion, as the deliverer of the empire. In order to transmit to posterity the memory of these great events, a magnificent triumphal arch which is yet extant, was built at the foot of Mount Palatine, near the amphitheatre of Vespasian. A statue also was erected in one of the public places of the city, representing the conqueror with a cross in his Land, and bearing the following insciiption, a token of his religious A. D. 306 — 337. CONSTANTINE THE GREAT. 101 gratitude: " By this salutary sign, tiie true mark of courage, I have delivered your city from the yoke of the tyrants, and restored the senate and the people of Rome to their ancient splendor." Constantine made no other use of the great power he had ac- quired by his victory, than to disband the proctorians, whom he reduced tf the rank of common soldiers, and to destroy their camp, which had been so frequently, since the reign of Tiberius, the seat of disorder and rebellion. He made no innovation in the govern- ment, magistracy and offices, and abrogated no laws, except such as were useless or unjust, v. g. those against the Christians, which he expressly annulled by a solemn edict. Moreover, he himself began from that time to make an open profession of Christianity, and to build splendid churches in honor of the true God, by whom he had been so visibly protected. Hence, the same year 312, which beheld the triumph and conversion of Constantine, beheld also the complete triumph of the Christian religion over her enemies, and may be con- sidered as the real epoch of the downfall of idolatry, which, without being persecuted, tottered to its fall, as soon as it was left to its natu- ral weakness. Towards the time when Rome and Italy were delivered from the tyranny of Maxentius, Asia was likewise rescued from her tyrant Maximin II, one of the two Csesars formerly appointed by Galerius, and, like him, one of the most cruel persecutors of the Church of Christ. Blinded by his ambition, he invaded the provinces of Lici- nius, but was conquered, near Byzantium, by a much smaller army than his own. The conquerors pursued him as far as Tarsus in Cilicia, where seeing himself almost in the hands of his enemy, he tried to shorten his life by poison. The poison instead of producing immediate effect, brought on a dreadful disease: he was inwardly burnt, with excruciating tortures : in the excess of his pains, he rolled himself on the ground, and roaring in a frightful manner, dashed his head against the walls with such violence, that his eyes started from their sockets ; a visible punishment of the cruehy with which he had caused the eyes of numbers of Christians to be put out, during the persecution. He expired, after several days of intolerable sufferings, in rage and despair. By his death, Licinius remained sole sovereign in the East. But Licinius himself, although a skilful general, was a cruel and worth- less prince, an enemy to men of learning, and, in his heart, a foe to religion, though to please Constantine, he at first joined with him in publishing edicts in favor of the Christians. Believing himself in- jured by the proposal of his colleague for a new and more adequate division of the empire, he raised armies to oppose the armies of Con- stentine. The two emperors, each at the head of his troops, met 9* 102 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 2. near Cibalis m Pannonia, where ihey commenced a sharp and weli contested battle. It lasted from morning till night 3 when at length Constantine's right wing began to obtain a decided advantage, which led in a short time to a complete victory. Licinius finding himself totally defeated, fled to Syrmium, and thence to Adrianople in Thrace, where he hastened to raise new forces, in order to stop the progress of his enemy. Accordingly, another battle was fought near a place named Mardia. Here neither of the parties could claim the victory, nor could either of them be said to have been vanquished, though Licinius suffered more than his adversary;* but their nearly equal losses facilitated an accommodation. Constantine, on account of his previous success and greater actual resources, dictated the terms of the treaty, and obtained a considerable increase of his dominions (a. d. 314). This treaty, though greatly disadvantageous to Licinius, was not, like most treaties of the same kind, of short duration. It lasted eight years, during which the empire was enabled to recover from the con- tinual shocks and disturbances it had suffered ever since the death of Constantius-Chlorus. But, in the year 323, hostilities were again provoked by Licinius. Constantine, ever quick and active, immediately entered his enemy's territory, and went in search of him, with an army of one hundred and twenty thousand foot and ten thousand horse. The troops of Licinius amounted to one hundred and fifty thousand infantry and fiifteen thousand cavalry. He had, besides, a powerful fleet consisting of three hundred and fifty galleys, to which Constantine could only oppose two hundred galleys, under the command of his son Crispus. The two land armies came in sight of each other near Adrianople, but were still separated by the river Hebrus. Licinius, being advan- tageously posted upon an eminence, kept himself on the defensive Constantine earnestly desired to attack him, and as the river was an obstacle, his warlike ardor, which could not bear a state of inactivity, made him contrive a stratagem to surprise the enemy. He ordered a quantity of wood to be cut, and cables to be prepared, as if he in- tended to throw a bridge over the Hebrus, and whilst the men of Licinius were trying to impede the progress of this work, Constan- tme, with a small detachment, went higher up the river, to a place where he knew it to be fordable, and crossing it at the head of some horsemen, was soon after followed by his whole army. Licinius, thus unexpectedly attacked, and unable to retreat, was forced to fight A great part of his troops made but little resistance : they were dis- * This was, during the long reign of Constantine, the only battle in whicb he was not completely victorious. A. I). 306 — 337.] CONSTANTINE THE GREAT. 103 concerted by the success of the enemy in passing the river, whilst the troops of Constantine ware elated with the hope of victory. The event justified the fears of one party, and the expectations of the other. The army of Licinius was completely defeated, and his camp forced and taken; he himself fled with all possible speed to Byzan- tium, leaving thirty-three thousand of his men on the field of battle, the rest having scattered themselves through the neighoring woods and mountains. During the following days, all these vanquished fugitives surrendered, and were kindly received. Constantine pursued Licinius, and blocked him up by land in By- zantium. In the meanwhile, two naval battles were fought on the narrow seas between Europe and Asia, in which Crispua, though much inferior in forces, so well availed himself first of the narrow- ness of the strait, and then of a strong and favorable wind, that the enemy's fleet was almost entirely destroyed. This enabled the vic- torious fleet of Constantine to advance towards Byzantium and to blockade it by sea, as it was already besieged by land. Licinius, aware of the imminent danger that threatened him, tied to Chalcedon on the opposite shore, not despairing of being still able to raise a suf- ficient force to try his fortune again. He was thus far successful in his plan ; for we find him at the head of one hundred and thirty thousand men, when his adversary, like- wise crossing the strait, overtook him on the other side. The armies engaged near Chrysopolis, a suburb of Chalcedon ; and Licinius, in spite of all his efforts, experienced a new and signal overthrow. One hundred thousand of his men were either killed or taken prisoners, the rest dispersed, and he himself, seeing his party entirely ruined, consented to surrender (a. d. 323). He obtained leave to retire to Thessalonica, but shortly after Avas put to death, with his son and his cnief general, either because he meditated new disturbances, or for other political reasons on the part of Constantine, who perhaps did not m this transaction sufficiently consult the natural generosity of his heart. The other partisans of Licinius received much better treatment from the conqueror, being left by him in the full possession of then estates and dignities. This clemency, not less than the perfect ability with which he had conducted the war, subdued to his power all the provinces of the East, and he was now acknowledged, without lur- iher obstacle, in the Vvrhole empire. Being thus free from the occu- pations and tumults of warfare, he applied himself to repair the evila of past disturbances by the advantages of a profound and lasting peace. He enacted a variety of excellent laws, some in favor of poor laborers, children, orphans, widows, prisoners and slaves ; others against iniquitous judges and governors, in a word, against all the 104 MODEEN HISTORY. [PART 2. oppressors of his people. In a rescript which he addressed to all the subjects of the empire, he thus expressed himself: "if any one, of what rank and condition soever he may be, is confident that he can plainly and manifestly prove any injustice done to him by those who exercise authority in my name, let him apply to me personally ; I will myself hear him ; I will take cognizance of the cause ; and if I find his allegations true, I will severely punish the man who shall have deceived me by a false appearance of integrity. So may the Almighty always favor and protect me, and keep the republic safe and flourishing." Such were the admirable views of Constantine with regard to the civil administration. He likewise applied himself with great care to maintain good order among the troops, and his zeal was crowned with success. It is remarkable that in the great number of civil wars in which he was engaged, no sedition, no revolt happened in his ar- mies. He owed the lasting tranquility he enjoyed in this respect, to his great qualities which commanded the esteem and admiration of his officers and soldiers, and to his behavior towards them, which was properly tempered with indulgence and resolution. Like all other great princes of every age and country, Constantine loved and patronized letters. He himself cultivated them, and en deavored to procure the same advantage to his sons, Crispus, Con- stantine, Constantius and Constans, giving them all an education suitable to their birth, and to the high rank to which they were des- tined. Besides choosing for them excellent masters in every depart- ment of Hterature, he himself was their first master, instructing them m Christian piety, in the science of government, and in mihtary ex- ercises. He taught them early the necessity and pleasure of doing good, by employing their tender hands, as soon as they could write, in signing gratuities and rewards. This great and good prince was particularly solicitous to make Christianity flourish. Nothing afforded him more pleasure than to learn its daily progress, and he himself contributed towards its ad- vancement by his exhortation and example. Whilst he gloried in openly professing that holy religion, he invited by an edict all his subjects, without however forcing any one, to renounce their old su- perstitions, and embrace the true faith which Almighty God had manifested to the whole world in so signal a manner. The zealous emperor endeavored also by letters to inspire Sapor II, king of Persia^ with favorable dispositions towards the Christians of his kingdom ; and not being able to succeed in this, he granted a safe and honorable retreat to those who were compelled to fly from the persecution raging m their country. In fine, it was through his protection that the first general council of the Church was convened and celebrated at Nice, A. D. 306 — 387.] CONSTANTINE THE GKEAT. 105 in Bithynia (a. d. 325). In this venerable assembly, three hundred and eighteen bishops, together with the legates of Pope St. Sylvester, condemned the Arian heresy with its author Arius, who, contrary to the Scriptures and to the belief of preceding ages, denied the divinity of Christ. Until about that lime, Constantine had reigned with such wisdom and happiness as to have rendered himself equal, perhaps superior, to the most accomplished and celebrated princes. But in the last twelve years of his life, he tarnished in some degree the great glory which he liad previously acquired. An excessive goodness made him leave unpunished the bad practices of many among the magistrates ant) other public officers; this gave rise to a greater number of vexations and miseries among the people. He also too easily gave credit to crafty and hypocritical persons, who abused his confidence, and in- duced him to banish, or exclude from favor, some of the most worthy men of the empire. His greatest fault was towards his own son Crispus, a young prince of uncommon merit; the emperor was so far deceived by an artful calumny, as to believe him guilty of an atrocious design, and, in the first moment of his indignation, caused him to be put to death. He soon perceived the calumny, and se- verely punished its authors ; too late however for the unfortimate Crispus, whose hasty execution he could but bitterly lament. Constantine is likewise reproached with some faults in his govern- ment and political views, chiefly with having disunited the empire by the foundation of a second capital. How far this can be just mat- tei of reproach, it is difficult to determine: the emperor's intention seems to have been pure, and worthy of a Christian prince. Wish- ing to make his residence in a place entirely purged from the remains of idolatry, and being exceedingly pleased with the situation of By- zantium in Thrace, he built on that spot a magnificent city, called from his name Constantinople, and from that time established in it the principal seat of the empire (a. d. 330). The faults of Constantine, though real stains on his memory, must' not however destroy the esteem and admiration due to his eminent qualities. Activity, application to affairs, piety and benevolence always shone conspicuous in him.* His alms to the poor and to all * Pagan writers themselves bear testimony to the virtues of Constantine, Libanius asserts (OTat. 3d) that he was always en2;aged in contriving oi executing some great design for the public utility. Entvopius, in his Roman hist lib. X. writes of him thus : " Vir primo imperii tempore optiinis principi- btis, ultimo mediis comparandus ; innumerae in eo animi corporisque virtutea clanieiimt." The same, in substance, is said b}' Praxagoras, Aurelius Vic- tor, and otheis, whose testimonies, not being liable to any charge of party prepossession, are by far preferable to the invectiv^es of the angry Zozimus and of Julian the Apostate, both of them the worthy predecessors of our modern infidels, in their haired against a prince who was the constant pro- tector of Christianity. 106 ^ MODERN HISTORY. [PART. 2. persons in distress, were immense; tils inclination to forgive injuries, was wonderful. In a sedition which happened in Egypt, probably al Alexandria, the mutinous populace insulted the statues of the empe- ror; the courtiers, in order to aggravate the crime of the seditious, represented that their rage had gone so far as to throw stones at the face of their prince, which still bore the marks of so fou. an outrage. Upon this, Constantine, with a smile, put his hands to his fa(;e, and mildly answered : **I do not feel any hurt;" thus refuting the exagge- rated charge of the courtiers, and reducing them to silence by a mag- nanimous reply which will never be forgotten by posterity. The em- peror acted consistently with his principles. Pitying the frenzy of those who had been guilty of such disrespect, he contented himself with taking proper measures to prevent the like disorders in future. This indulgence and goodness of Constantine for his people, gained him the affection of all; whilst his greatness and glory at- tracted the respect, not only of the Romans, but even of all the neighboring nations. His palace was crowded with ambassadors from the Germans, the Goths, the Sarmatians, the Persians, the In dians, the Ethiopians, and other distant nations, as different Inm each other in their features and complexion, as in their dress and or- naments, but all filled with sentiments of deep veneration for the em- peror. According to the difference of their countries and climes, they brought him a great variety of presents, such as crowns of gold, diadems enriched wit-h precious stones, arms of a particular kind, animals unknown in Europe, etc. Constantine graciously re- ceived their presents, and in return made them others of much greater value. Many of these foreigners were so much struck at the splendor of his court, so delighted with his noble and affable beha- vior, and conceived such an esteem for his virtue, in proportion as they became better acquainted with him, that, forgetting their own country, they attached themselves to the service of so great and so excellent a prince. The glory of arms contributed to crown the splendor of his latter years. He had already, during the interval of his wars against Licinius, defeated the Goths and the Sarmatians in many battles ; but, that first lesson not having sufRciently subdued their restless spirit, upon their renewing the hostilities in the yoar 33'2, he again so signally defeated those fierce nations, that they were obhged to sue for peace, and to g've hostages. In fine, he showd the same reso- lution against the Persians who had lately attacked Mesopotamia: though much advanced in age, he prepared to inarch against them, and the mere terror of his name made them retire beyond the Tigris, Shortly after, Constantine fell dangerously ill, and having pre- pared himself for death by an increase of piety, aeparted this life, on A. D. 337 — 3'6L] CONSTANTIUS, ETC. 107 the 22(1 of May (a. d. 337), at the age of nearly sixty-four, after a glorious reign of thirty-one years, the longest since that of Augustus. The splendor of his military, political and religious achievements, gained him the surname of Great which posterity has confirmed. No grief was ever more universal, more sincere, and more strongly exjjressed, than that occasioned by his death. No sooner was the melancholy event made known, than his guards rent their garments, and in the excess of their sorrow, struck their heads and fell to the ground, calling him with lamentable sobs and cries their beloved master, sovereign and father. The tribunes, the centurions, and the soldiers seemed unwilling to survive a prince, whose liberality they had constantly experienced, whose heroic valor they had so fre- quently admired on the field of battle. The inhabitants of Nicomedia ran confusedly through the streets, sighing and weeping; it seemed as if each family had lost the best of parents. In a word, all the em- pire, and Rome itself, which he had left for another residence, were plunged in the deepest aflliction; and so dear to all was the memory of their deceased sovereign, that both the people of this capital, and the many legions scattered through the provinces, unanimously re- solved, without the possibility of common deliberation, to acknow- ledge none as emperors, except the sons of Constantine. CONSTANTIUS AM) HIS BROTHERS CONSTANTINE II AND CONSTANS.— A. D. 337—361. The three brothers divide! the empire among themselves, in the fol lowhig manner: Gaul, Britain and Spain were allotted to Constantine, who was the eldest; Italy, Illyria and Africa, to Constans, wno was the youngest ; and the provinces of the East, to Constantius. It might seem that every thing had been settled to their common satisfaction; however, Constantine remained only a short time contented with his department. After several useless complaints, he endeavored to en- croach upon the territories of Constans, but perished in the attempt, being slain in ambuscade near Aquileia, (a. d. 340). Constans then 8&i7ed the estates of the vanquished, and added them to his own. Constantius took no share in the quarrels of his brothers. Being moderate and humane by nature, but weak, suspicious, jealous, even cruel through ambition,* and always surrounded byevil counsellors, who knew how to conceal their wickedness under the mask of vir- tue, he made it his chief occupation to disturb the Church in favcr *He is commonly thought to have connived at the murder of his uncleg and nearl}'^ all his cousins, which, under pretence of zeal, was perpetrated 108 MODERN HISTORY. [PART. 2. of the Arians, and obstinately to persecute the great St. Athanasius^ patriarch of Alexandria, and the other defenders of the Nicene faith. However, he was also engaged for many years, in opposing the re- peated attacks of the Persians, and this he did with very Uttle ability and success j yet, the enemy did not gain any decisive advantage, and having three times assaulted the city of Nisibis, was as many times repelled with considerable loss. Another revolution in the West soon attracted the attention of Constantius. In the year 350, his brother Constans fell a victim to a conspiracy artfully contrived by a certain Magnentius, who com- manded some troops in Gaul, and pretended to reign in his place. At the first news of this disastrous event, Constantius hastened from the East to punish the usurper, w^ho, on his side, had made exten- sive preparations to repel the attack. The famous battle of Mursa which cost the lives of sixty thousand men, decided the contest in favor of Constantius. After extraordinary exertions made by both parties, the troops of Magnentius were completely routed, and either destroyed by the cavalry of Constantius, or precipitated into the river Drave. In this distress, Magnentius, seeing himself on the point of falling into the hands of the enemy, cast off the imperial insignia, took the horse and garments of a common soldier, and fled in full speed across the Alps, until he arrived at Aquileia. After a short stay there, he retired to Lyons in Gaul, where he tried the chance of another battle, but was again defeated. At length, finding himself abandoned by his own troops, he put his family to the sword, and then killed himself, after an usurped reign of three years (a. d. 353). Thus all the parts of the empire were again united under the same sovereign. But such a burden was too heavy for Constantius, and he himself being sensible how much he stood in need of an as- sistant, made choice, for this purpose, of his cousin Julian, who had, on account of his tender age, been spared in the massacre of his family. He conferred on him the title of Csesar, and sent him to de- fend the frontiers near the Rnine against the inroads of the Germans. After having freed himself from the cares of war, ne applied more than ever to his favorite occupation of promoting the cause of Arianism. By his orders, the orthodox bishops were driven from their sees, ba- - nished, imprisoned, and compelled by threats and ill-treatment to sign ambiguous formulas which might afterwards be made subservient to a confirmation of the heresy. But neither artifice nor violence could make Arianism prevail in the Church, and even in the midst of the by the soldiers in the beginning of his reign. His brothers, on the contrary. do not appear to have in any vvay participated in the odious and cruel deed, nor was it ever laid to their cliarcje. A. D. 861—363.] JULIAN. 109 storm, the far greater number of both the pastors and the faithful al- ways closely adhered to the profession of the true faith, as is attested by St. Athanasius,* Sulpitius-Severus,+ and others. Whilst Constantius disturbed the whole Christian flock, Julian waa discharging his duties and fulfiUing his perilous commission in Gaul with great success. This prince, who afterwards deserved the sur- name of Apostate, at first displayed only great qualities. His princi- pal care was tore-establish good order in the provinces, and discipline in the armies. Attacked by numerous hordes of Alemanni and Franks, he not only dehvered the country from their invasion, but entirely defeated seven of their kings in a great ba.Ule near Strasburg, pursued them beyond the Rhine, and subdued them by repeated victories. The emperor became jealous and alarmed at the increasing glory of the young Caesar; and, being moreover attacked anew by the Per- sians, he thought it a proper opportunity to deprive Julian of a con- siderable portion of his troops. Accordingly, some legions were commanded to depart from Gaul into Asia. This order caused gene- ral discontent, both among the soldiers, and the inhabitants who en- treated them not to abandon a country which they had so well de- fended ; at last, the troops revolted, and proclaimed Julian emperor. With real or feigned reluctance, he accepted the tide offered him by the soldiers, took the diadem, and not being able to -settle his differ- ence with Constantius in a peaceful manner, advanced as far as Sir- mium to fight against that prince, who after all had been his bene- factor as well as sovereign. Fortunately for his cause, the death of Constantius, which happened just at that time (November 361), de- livered him from his perplexing position, and preserved the empiro from the horrors of a new civil war. JULIAN.— A. D. 361—363. Julian now proceeded without opposition to Constantinople, where he was immediately acknowledged emperor, as well as in all the provinces. The beginning of his reign was remarkable for the ardor with which he affected to redress the abuses of the late govern- ment; and it cannot be denied that he greatly improved, in a shorl time, many parts of the civil and military administration. But in this prince, good was aiways attended witli evil. He aimed at notli- ing so much as the restoration of the worship of idols, and the de* * S. Atban. Evist. ad Jovxanum Impcr. n. 2. t Snip. Sever.' Ws<. sacr. lib. ii, passim 10 110 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 2. struction of the religion of Christ, which lie had already publicly renounced. He pursued this two-fold object with incessant and un- abated activity; though he endeavored to effect it more by dissimu- lation and artful measures, than by open force and violence. Whilst all favors were lavished on a crowd of miserable sophists and magi- cians by whom he was constantly surrounded, the Christians expe- rienced nothing from him but contempt, vexations and disgrace. On all occasions he loaded them with insult, and openly violated in their regard the most common laws of equity; excluding them from the rights of citizens, and from fair trial in the courts of justice; forbid- ding them to teach and to be taught in the schools ; not admitting any one to offices of trust and authority ; continually endeavoring to make apostates; and, notwithstanding his feigned moderation, often giving secret orders to put to death those on whom other means of seduc- tion had produced no effect. Julian desired above all things to bring the charge of imposture on the predictions of our Saviour* and of the prophet Danielf concern- ing the entire and irreparable desolation of the temple of Jerusalem. Nearly three hundred years after it had been destroyed under Vespa- sian and Titus, he undertook to raise it from its ruins. Although the Jews had no great share in his affection, he invited them, by a flat- tering letter, to concur in the enterprise; and, uniting effects with promises, he sept a great number of workmen to Jerusalem, ordered his treasurers to furnish money and every thing necessary for the re- building of the temple, and appointed one of his confidential officers, named Alypius, to enforce the execution of his orders. The news was no sooner spread abroad, than the Jews, elated with joy, flocked from all parts to Jerusalem. Immense quantities of stone, brick, timber and other materials were prepared for the impor- tant work. When every thing was in readiness, the workmen began to clear the ground, to dig up the earth, and to remove the old foun- dations; Jews of all ranks, young and old, women and children, shared in the labor, with so much eargerness, that some made use of silver pickaxes and spades, in honor of the undertaking. St. Cyril, bishop of Jerusalem, beheld these mighty preparations without anx- iety. Full of confidence in the divine predictions, he said that the Jews, far from being able to rebuild their temple, would, on the con- trary, fully verify the prophecy of Christ, by entirely removing the former foundations which still subsisted, and thus be mstrumental in the literal fulfilment of what our Saviour had foretold, that of all this splendid temple there should not be left a stone upon a stone. The trenches were now open, the new foundations were ready to be laid next morning, and the Jews already began to triumph ; when, * Matt, xxiv, 2. t Dan. ix, 27 A. D. 861—363.] JU^LiAN. Ill during the night, a sudden earthquake destroyed the trenches, over- turned the adjacent buildings, and buried many workmen under the ruins : at the same time, the prodigious heaps of lime, sand and other materials which had been prepared, were scattered by whirl- winds. This first obstacle astonished the Jews, but did not conquer their obstinacy; and they again set to work, under the direction of Alypius. At this moment, from the bowels of the earth, near the foundation, there burst forth a flaming torrent and balls of fire, which dislodged the stones, melted the iron instruments, burned the work- men, and afterwards, running through the place and amidst the mul- titude of spectators, consumed or suffocated the Jews, whom the avenging element singled out with a sort of instinct. This awful prodigy was often repeated, and what showed more and more visibly the supernatural intervention of the divine power, was that the fire reappeared whenever the work was resumed, and ceased only when the attempt was entirely given over. There is not in all history a fact more certain and incontestible than this, as it happened, to use the words of an illustrious historian,* in the presence of the whole world, and was equally attested by Chris- tians, Jews and Gentiles. f Many among the witnesses of this pro- digious event, Avhether Jews or Heathens, confessed the divinity of Christ, and asked for baptism. The unhappy Julian, on the contrary, gtill continued blind and hardened in the midst of so much light, and now directed his principal thoughts to another object. He had been, all this while, making preparations for war, in order to avenge the many insults offered to the empire by Sapor, its mve- lerate enemy. This Sapor is famous among the Persian kings, for his warlike disposhion, violence and cruelties, during a reign of seventy years : he had lately overrun that part of Mesopotamia v/hich belonged to the Romans, and destroyed the important city of Amide. Julian resolved, not only to drive him from his frontiers, but also to subdue the whole Persian monarchy, and then, like Alexander the Great, to proceed to the conquest of India. With this view, he crossed the Euphrates at the head of sixty five thousand men, and marched through Carra; in Mesopotamia, a spot rendered famous by the defeat of Crassus. He also visited the sepulchre of Gordian III, who had been murdered at the end of a glorious expedition against the same Persians. Thence, the Romans followed the course of the river, taking by storm and firing such cities as offered any resistance; a numerous fleet, loaded with provisions, accompanied the army. * Lebcau. hist, du Bas Empire, ad ann. 363. vol. in, p. 26 1. t Seo Note D. 112 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 2. At a short distance from the royril city of Ctesiphon, Julian dis- covered the vestiges of an ancient canal, which had been dug by the Babylonian kings, to unite the Euphrates and the Tigris, but which was now filled up, and could scarcely be distinguished from the other parts of the plain. The emperor caused it to be cleared, and the fleet following the current of the water, easily passed from the Euphrates into the Tigris. After a short stay, the whole army crossed the Tigris itself, in spite of numerous bands of Persians who, from the other side of the river, vigorously opposed the passage, but who, not being able to resist long the impetuous shock of the Roman legions, were completely routed. The success of the day was owing chiefly to the intrepidity, firmness and presence of mind of Juhan. He did not however attempt to besiege Ctesiphon, for fear both of spending too much time in this undertaking, and of being himself shut up between that town and a formidable army conducted by Sa- por, which was daily approaching. He then resolved to follow up the Tigris, until he should reach the confines of Armenia; but a spe- cious advice, given him by a Persian deserter whose fideUty he did not suspect, made him again alter his plan. Under the pretence that the fleet would be scarcely able, even with extraordinary exertions, to overcome the rapidity of the current, he gave orders, notwithstanding the objection of the whole army, that the vessels should be set on fire ; he then left the banks of the Tigris, the more quickly to pene- trate into the heart of the enemy^s country, and carried his impru- dence so far as to continue for several days in the the way which his perfidious guide pointed out to him, even after the treason was detected. The army first advanced through a rich and fertile country, but soon found itself in the midst of vast plains where every thing had been purposely destroyed and burnt by the Persians. The troops of Sapor then appeared, and, thinking the occasion proper for battle, attacked the Romans. The latter indeed remained victorious ; but they had now to struggle against more dangerous enemies, namely, fatigue, anxiety and famine. The dangers of the march increased every day; and, to complete their misfortune, they lost just at that time the man who alone could have saved them wittiout dishonor, and have repaired his own imprudence by the natural resources of his genius. In a battle fought on the twenty-sixlh of June (363), Julian, having exposed himself without a cuirass, had his liver pierced with a dart thrown by an unknown hand. He was carried back to his tent almost senseless, and, notwithstanding the cares of his physicians, expired the following night, at the age of thirty-one after a reign of nearly two years. According to some, .he died with A. D. 363—364.] JOVIAN. 113 great apparent composure and tranquillity; but others* relate that, when he fell himself mortally wounded, he threw a handful of his blood towards heaven, uttering these blasphemous words against Christ: *' Thou hast conquered, O Galilean;" and that he likewise upbraided his own gods, charging them with ingratitude in his regard. It would be impossible to give a precise outline of Julian's charac- ter. It was a most singular compound of some good and many bad quahties, moderation and malice, love of justice and blind hatred, courage and temerity. He united a cultivated genius with a bigoted mind ; he was a slave to vanity and credulity, superstitiously attached to the meanest, and perhaps also, after he became a public apostate to the most abominable practices of idolatry : for we are told by some grave authorsf that, besides an incredible number of animals, he like- wise sacrificed human victims, for the purpose of discovering future events by an examination of their palpitating entrails. In a v/ord, his defects were real, his virtues more apparent than sincere, his talents more brilliant than solid. The only genuine qualities perhaps that Julian possessed, were his intrepidity in war and the talent he had to transform his soldiers into heroes. King fSapor did not cease to tremble for the safety of his crown, till he received the inteUigence of the emperor's death. He manifested the greatest joy on being apprized of it, and wished to re- ward the soldier by whom JuHan had been wounded; but no one pre- sented himself to receive the recompense. JOVIAN— A. D. 363—364. Most distressing was the situation to which the Romans were now reduced in the midst of an hostile country, without food and deprived of their leader. The chief officers assembled to appoint a successor to Julian, and, upon the refusal of Sallust, prefect of the East, Jovian, one of the commanders in the imperial guard, was proclaimed emperor. After a slow and painful march for several days, he concluded with the Persians a disadvantageous treaty of peace; a step deemed neces- Eary to save the army from starvation, but disgraceful to the empire, which lost, by tliis means, five provinces and the best towns of Me- Dopotamia. Such was the result of Julian's imprudence and temerity. Although the Romans, in their retreat, were no longer interrupted by the enemy, still they encountered many dangers, especially wheu they undertook to recross the Tigris; and their march continued diHi- * Theodoret, Sozomen, etc. t Especially Theodoret, Hist. Ecd. lib. iii, c. 21. 10* ll-i MODERN HISTORY. [PART 2. oult and harassing, until lliey reached their own territory. Jovian, ou kis arrival at Antioch, immediately turned his attention to the go- vernment of the state, and the restoration of peace to the Church. He had, even during the storms of the two preceding reigns, always adhered to the orthodox faith, and anxious to maintain it in others, he labored to heal the wounds inflicted by Julian on Christianity in gene- ral, and by Constantius on the Catholics. His excellent intentions and many good qualities, though less dazzling than those of Julian, promised a prosperous reign ; but, having set out from Antioch in the dead of winter, he was found lifeless in his room (February 364), before he could reach Constantinople. The cause of his death was never ascertained ; but the most common opinion is that he inhaled the fumes of charcoal. Jovian had lived thirty-three years, and reigned eight months. VALENTINIAN AND VALENS— a. d. 36-ir— 378. The army set about a new election, and proclaimed emperor, Va- lentinian, an officer of distinguished merit. His noble size and fea- tures gave him a warlike arid majestic appearance; he was renowned for prudence, valor, learning, sincere attachment to religion and great love of justice. Pure in his morals, grave in his deportment, he spoke httle, but always with great judgment and natural eloquence. Unhappily, these truly valuable qualities of body and mind were tar- nished in him by some notable defects, such as violence of temper and excessive severity, whence finally arose the painful accident which terminated his life. Valentinian had no sooner assumed the purple, tllan he associated to himself his brother Valens in the government of the empire. Still, before publicly declaring his intentions, he consulted his chief officers on the subject. All remained silent, except one, who was genemns enough to say : " Prince, if you love your family, you may choose your brother ; if you love the stale, select the fittest man for so great a dignity." This advice struck the emperor; however, he persisted m his design, and declared Valens his colleague. He allotted to him ihe provinces of Asia, with Egypt and Thrace, and kept for himself the other provinces situated in Africa and Europe. "Valentinian governed his portion of the empire with vigor and firmness. Making his residence, sometimes in Milan, sometimes in Triers, Paris or Rheims, he was always ready to defend his frontiers, and to repel the attacks of the barbarians posted beyond the Rhin« A. D. 864 — 3T8.] VALENTINIAN AND VALENS. 115 and the Danube. He kept in constant awe the restless tribes of Ger- many, and triumphed over them in every battle. But, whilst his bravery and mihtary science struck terror into the minds of the barbarians, his irascible humor was almost equally dreaded by his own subjects, till in the end it proved fatal to himself. The Qluadi, a poor and timid nation, having incurred his displeasure. Bent ambassadors to appease his anger by an humble apology. Va- lentuiian was offended at the mean appearance of the ambassadors, and exclaimed that it was a shame for the empire and the emperor, that he had to treat with such ill-looking people. He spoke with such Avarmth and passion, that he broke a large blood-vessel, and fell senseless to the ground, his blood gushing forth abundantly from his mouth. A few hours afcer, he expired in great pain, at the age of fifty-four, after a reign of nearly twelve years (a, d. 375), leaving his sceptre to his sons Gratian and Valentinian 11. The East was still under the sway of his brother Valens, a prince of good morals and steadfast in his friendship ; but at the same time indolent, without genius and experience, often suffering his ministers to make a tyrannical use of his authority. He showed no energy ex- cept in protecting the Arians and cruelly persecuting the Catholics. But the faith of the latter was successfully defended by the illustrious doctors St. Gregory Nazianzen and his intimate friend St. Basil, archbishop of Csesarea, against whom all the emperor's efforts proved fruitless. With regard to military achievements, Valens, by the skill of his generals and the bravery of his troops, conducted, with considerable success, several campaigns against the Goths, the Persians, and the usurper Procopius, who, after many vicissitudes of fortune, was be- trayed by his own friends, delivered up to the emperor, and behead- ed. But the last expedition of this prince had, through his own fault, a quite different result. Numerous bodies of Huns, a barbarous people from the north of Asia, were at that time driving before them all the tribes whom they met in their devastating course. Two hun- dred thousand Goths, finding themselves more and more harassed by these formidable enemies, asked and obtained of Valens leave to cross the Danube, and to settle in Thrace as subjects or allies. They* were followed by other bodies of their countrymen whom it was not pos- sible to keep afar off on the other side of the river; and the Roman officers stationed on the frontier were at the same time so impru- dent and inhuman, as to exasperate by ill-treatment that immense multitude dying with hunger and supplied with arms. They revolt- ed against their oppressors, and, being excited both by distress and the desire of revenge, they began to overrun the country and pul every thing to fire and sword. 116 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 2. The generals of Valens endeavored, but too late, to stern this tor- rent. Several bloody battles were fought to no purpose; and the emperor, not satisfied with the result, judged it necessary to repaii in person to the field, and put himself at the head of his troops. This step served only to increase the danger; for the commander of the Goths, Fritigern, was an able and experienced general; whilst Valens had neither ability nor prudence. Instead of waiting .or *he arrival of his nephew Gratian, who, after gaining a great victory over the Germans, hastened to his assistance, the unwary prince, contrary to the advice of his best officers, marched with precipitancy and confusion against the enemy; and, with troops harassed by fatigue, commenced near Adrianople a battle more disastrous, it is believed, than any that the Romans had ever fought from the time of their defeat at Cannai by Annibal. Here also they experienced a most signal overthrow, and lost nearly their whole army, with an incredible multitude of chief officers, and the emperor himself, whose body could never be found. According to common report, he was wounded, and carried in that state to a hut, which the Goths, not knowing who was in it, set on fire; and Valens perished in the flames. He had reigned about fifteen, and lived nearly fifty years (a. d. 378). THEODOSIUS I, SURNAMED THE GREAT.— GRATIAN ANT VALENTINIAN II.— 379— 395. The Roman empire had perhaps never been so much exposed to the danger of total ruin, as immediately after the battle of Adriano- ple. Though the Goths were unsuccessful in their attacks upon that and some other towns, they together with the Huns and Alans con- tinued with impunity, to plunder, waste and destroy every thing in Thrace, Illyria and the neighboring provinces. The Suevi, Aleman- ni and Franks were at the same time preparing to invade Gaul, and the provinces of Asia were also threatened with new attacks from the Persians. Gratian, upon whom the whole burden of the gov- ernment devolved by the death of his uncle Valens, was fully aware that he could not by himself repel so many enemies, nor could he as yet derive any assistance from his brother Valentinian, a child seven or eight years of age. Standing in need of more powerful suc- cor, he was candid enough to declare his situation before all the world, and wise enough to choose as his associate the ablest man of the empire, viz : the great Theodosius, with whose name is associ- ated the recollection of every civil, religious and military virtue. A. D. 379 — 395.] THEODOSIUS THE GREAT. 117 Theodosius was a native of Spain, and son of the celebrated Counl Theodosius, who, after having, by his brilliant campaigns under Valentinian I, saved Great Britain and Africa from powerful inva- ders, had lately perished on a scaffold at Carthage, the victim of an atrocious and artful calumny. Previously to this melancholy trans- action, his son had on several occasions, displayed great military talents; but, after the tragical death of his father, he led a retired hfe in his native country ; until Gratian called him back to court, and offered him the purple, which he at first refused through sincere modesty, but afterwards accepted through a pure motive of obedi- ence. It was agreed among them that he should rule over the East, Gratian reserving the West for himself and his young brother Valentinian. The accesion of Theodosius almost instantaneously changed the desperate state of affairs, and gave a salutary check to the inroads of tlie barbarians. The Goths were the first who experienced the effects of his indignation and invincible bravery. He obliged them either to surrender, or retire beyond the Danube. The Huns and the Alans were soon compelled to do the same ; the Persians, informed of his rapid exploits, sued for peace ; and, in a few years, the name of Theodosius was respected throughout the world. He availed himself of the tranquillity which followed his victories, to enact several admirable laws, conducive alike to the prosperity of the state at large, to the repression of vice and the advancement of good morals among private individuals, to the security of life and pro- perty, etc. All his legislation breathes, as it were, an ardetit love of the public good, of justice and religion, happily blended with a dignified clemency towards those who might possibly offer him personal in- sults, by outrageous language against his person, conduct and go- vernment. "If such persons,'^ said he in one of his rescripts, '* act and speak thus through levity, we should disregard their fault; if their conduct proceeds from blindness and folly, we should pity them; if from ill-will and malice, we should forgive them." His heart Avas so inclined to benevolence, that, once dismissing several prisoners, he exclaimed: *' O that I could restore the dead to life!" Theodosius endeavored likewise during the whole course of his reign, to promote, by wise and prudent means, the advancement of true piety, and of the orthodox faith which he sincerely professed. Arianism, not being able to obtain the least favor from so religious a prince, rapidly dwindled into insignificance. The Macedonian here- sy against the divinity of the Holy Ghost, was solemnly condemned by the second general Council, held under his patronage at Constan- tinople (a. d. 381). In fine, the pious efforts of the emperor gave the deadly blow to heatiunism, and his zeal, equally mild and firm, judi- 118 MODERN" HISTORY. [PART 2. cious and constant, was not satisfied until the public worship of idolf disappeared from his dominions. The example of Theodosius was in most respects faithfully imi- tated by Gratian, the emperor of the West. This prince, although very young, would perhaps have become equal to his virtuous col- league in glory and wisdom, had it not been for a single defect, which being disregarded, tarnished the lustre of his excellent quaU- ties, and brought upon him a terrible disaster. Being excessively fond of hunting, the natural consequence was that he paid little atten- tion to the affairs of his court, where discontent began to prevail, at the sight of the honors and benefits conferred upon strangers. Maxi- mus, one of the chief officers in Great Britain, caused himself to be proclaimed emperor by some of the soldiers; nor did the defection confine itself to that island, but passing over to the continent, it spread among the legions of Gaul with such rapidity, that in a few weeks Gratian saw himself abandoned by nearly all his troops. No other resource was now left him than a precipitate flight ; and even that proved insufficient to save him from the hands of his enemies: he was overtaken at Lyons, and cruelly murdered at the age of twenty- four, after a reign of eight years (a. d. 383). Maximus abstained for a time from pursuing his audacious and ambitious career ; fixing his residence in Triers, he contented himself with reigning over the provinces which Gratian had governed. Still, he was making slow and powerful preparations to oppress young Valentinian in Italy, as he had done his brother in Gaul; but Valen- tinian having received timely warning of the designs of his enemy, fled in fall speed to Thessalonica, persuaded that he would find a zealous protector in Theodosius. His hopes were not deceived : Theodosius received him with open arms, and marched with him, at the head of his army, against Maximus, who was coming forward to meet them, with more boldness than prudence. One single and short campaign terminated the contest. The numerous troops of the usurper were conquered in two battles, and he himself being taken prisoner in Aquileia, whither he had retired after the second engage- ment, was led to Theodosius, with his hands tied behind him. At the sight of his captive, the generous conqueror felt inclined to com- passion and forgiveness; but his oflficers, less indulgent, led Maxi- mus away, and immediately beheaded him. No search was made after his partisans, and Theodosius added to the dominions of Valen- tinian those of his brother Gratian (a. d. 388). About the same time, he gave to all future generations a most ad mirable example of clemency. A great sedition having burst forth in Antioch, the people carried their insolence so far as to break to pieces the statues of the emperor and of his family. Theodosius, A. D. 379 — 895.] THEODOSIUS THE GREAT. 119 justly irritated against an ungrateful city on which he had bestowed many signal favors, sent two commissaries, with orders to punish tne leaders of the seditious riot, to deprive Antioch of its privi- leges, and to degrade that proud capital of Syria to the low rank of a simple borough. The arrival of the two commissaries spread terror through the town. The most guilty of the inhabitants were arrested, and put in confinement; however, the sorrowful multitude, together with the clergy, obtained by their supplications and tears, that the punishment should be postponed. The venerable bishop Flavian had already set out for Constantinople, in order to allay, if possible, the indignation of Theodosius. The first time he was introduced before him, he remained at some distance, with his eyes cast down, and observing a mournful silence. The emperor, whose heart was not less afflicted, approached the bishop, and with strong but tender reproaches, expa- tiated on the ingratitude of his countrymen. Flavian, being then emboldened to speak, acknowledged both the enormity of the crime and the justice of any punishment that might be inflicted on its au- thors ; but he afterwards so eloquently described and extolled the ad- vantages of the forgiveness of injuries, that the emperor, unable any longer to restrain his tears, cried out that he willingly pardoned An- tioch, after the example of Christ who had forgiven his very execu- tioners. The pardon was entire, unreserved, and did infinite honor to the clemency of Theodosius. Three years after, on a similar occasion, he appeared to forget his own principles. The populace of Thessalonica, in a tumultuous insurrection, stoned their governor to death : Theodosius, who then resided at Milan, was so indignant at this outrage, that he issued a warrant for the soldiery to be let loose on the inhabitants of Thessa- lonica during three hours, and the commission was executed with such fury, that seven thousand persons were put to the sword. No sooner was the holy archbishop of Milan, St. Ambrose, informed of the awful deed, than he declared to the emperor that he could not admit him into the Church, nor to the participation of the sacred mysteries, until he had atoned, by an exemplary penance, for the enormity of the massacre lately committed. Theodosius humbly submitted to the decision of the holy prelate, and remained thus ex- cluded from the Church for eight months, at the end of which time St. Ambrose, moved by his tears and lively repentance, again admit- ted him; on condition, however, that he would ever after, in order to avoid similar faults, postpone for thirty days the execution even of just sentences of death, Theodosius wiflingly yielded to the propo- sal, and, by this docility, left it uncertain which is more worthy of 120 MODERN HISTORY. [pART 2. admiration, the firmness of tne archbishop or the piety of the emperor. This prince was scarcely returned to Constantinople, when a fresh and disastrous revolution, caused by the murder of Valentinian II, obliged him to make a new expedition into the West. That young emperor, trained up to virtue by the instructions and examples of Theodosius, knew already how to conduct himself with great wis- dom, and gave every day greater hopes of a fortunate and glorious reign. Being told that some suspicions, though ill-founded, were entertained concerning his morals, he dismissed without delay the persons whose society might become dangerous for his virtue. He overcame his excessive relish for the games and shows of the circus, by abolishing the games, and causing all the beasts destined for them or for the chase, to be killed on the same day. Although he had found the treasury exhausted, no solicitation of his courtiers could ever in- duce him to augment the taxes. His conduct obtained respect even from the barbarians, and he was endeavoring by every means in his power to procure abundance and tranquillity to his subjects, when a cruel plot contrived by Arbogastes, the general of his troops, deprived him of the empire and of life, at the age of twenty, after a reign of nine years since the death of Gratian (a. d. 392). Intense was the affliction of Theodosius, when he learned the melancholy fate of this excellent prince, his brother-in-law, his part- ner in the empire, and his sincere friend. Justice, humanity and con- science obliging him to avenge the death of Valentinian and punish the murderers, he spent two years in making adequate preparations for this new expedition, which he justly supposed would be difficult and bloody • for Arbogastes had a great reputation for skiH in war, and a strong party on his side. Still, being of barbarian extraction, he did not dare assume the imperial sceptre himself, but placed it in the hands of a certain Eugenius, a proud, ambitious man, who had been a secretary of the late emperor, and had taken part in his assas- sination. The two armies advanced against each other, the one from Gaul, under the command of the two usurpers, who had the images of the false gods carried before them; the other from Thrace, under the ban- ner of the cross, and commanded by Theodosius in person. They met in the northeast of Italy, at the distance of about thirty miles from Aquileia. Here a general engagement took place, which the importance of the cause, the number and discipline of the troops, the heroic intrepidity of Theodosius and the desperate courage of Ar- bogastes, rendered extremely furious and obstinate. It lasted two days, the first of which, without giving to either party any decisive loss or advantage, beheld a tremendous havoc of the bravest troops A. D. 379 — 395.] THEODOSIUS THE GREAT. 121 of Theodosius. The pious emperor spent the following night in prayer, placing his confidence in God whose cause he supported, more than in all the exertions of his ability and valor. At the dawn of day, he again drew up his army, and, takmg his shield and cui- rass, marched out with ardor against the enemy. This was the moment which heaven had chosen, in order to de^ dare visibly in his favor. On a sudden, frightful whirlwinds arose, which directed all their violence against the rebels, broke their ranks, and forced their shields from their hands. Their arrows turned against themselves, whilst those of their opponents received addi- tional force from the wind.* Thus exposed, blinded by the dust, and overpowered by the storm, they either fell on the field of battle, or threw themselves, in their flight, into a neighboring river. Arbogas tes, seemg that all was lost, stabbed himself, and died in rage and de- spair. Eugenius was brought in chains by his own soldiers before Theodosius, who presently condemned him to death; but the generous conqueror pardoned all the others of their party. The slaughter ceased, and the two armies mingled together, exulting with joy, one for its victory, the other for its defeat, and both looking on their pious emperor as really invincible. This memorable battle, which was fought on the-Gth of Septem ber (a. d. 394), subjected all the West to Theodosius. He lived but a short time after this glorious triumph over his enemies: continual labors and hardships, especially at the head of armies, had exhausted his constitution, and, after lingering for some weeks, he died in the middle of the following January (a. d. 395), at the age of fifty, after a reign of sixteen years. This was the last reign which saw all the parts of the Roman empire united under the sway of the same sove- reign. At the solemn service performed, according to custom, for his * See Socrates, Eccles. Hist, lib. V, c. 25; — Sozomen, lib. VII, c. 24; — Orosius, lib. VII, c. 3; — Theodoret, lib. v. c. 24; especially St. Augustine, who had learned the fact in question from the very soldiers of Eugenius that had been present at the battle, as he himself relates in these terms: *'Milites nobis, qui aderant, retulerunt, extorta sibi esse de manibus quae- cumque jaciebantur, cum a Theodosii partibus vehemens ventus iret, et non soliim quaecumque in eos jaciebantur concitatissim^ raperet, veriim etiam ipsorum tela in eorum corpora retorqueret;" De Civitate Dei^ hb V, c. 26. In fine, the poet Claudian, though a heathen, describes the same thus, in his poem on the third consulship of the young emperor Ho- ponus : Te propter, gelidis aquilo de monte procellis Obriiit adversas acies, revolutaque tela Vertit in auctores, et turbine reppulit hastas. O nimi^m dilecte Deo, cui fundlt ab antris ^olus arraatas hiemes; cui militat aether, Et conjurati veniunt ad classica venti! 11 122 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 2. departed soul, St. Ambrose delivered the funeral oration in presence of the whole army: after which, his body was transferred to Con- stantinople, and deposited in the Mausoleum of the great Constantine with whom he shares in the just praises and admiration of posterity. In fact, every public achievement of this emperor would suffice to illustrate a long reign. He restored the majesty of the empire, made the people under him constantly happy, and conquered all his ene- mies, who were equally the enemies of the state. lie subdued the Goths, drove back the Huns and Sarraatians, kept the Persians in constant awe, overcame two powerful usurpers, checked the Arian and Macedonian heresies, almost completed the destruction of idol- atry without shedding a drop of blood, and published a great num- ber of laws so wise and excellent, as to place him far above the wisest legislators of antiquity. Having nothing in view but the hap- piness of mankind, he commanded by a formal edict, that, on Easter- day, all persons detained in prison, whose dismission would not en- danger the interest and good order of society, should be set at liberty, and it was on this occasion that he added the memorable words al- ready mentioned : " that I could even raise the dead to life !" In his countenance and all his deportment, Theodosius was digni- fied, but at the same time, cheerful, mild, courteous and affable. He always kept himself free, not only from gross vices, but even from those which most easily find admission to the heart, such as ambition andvain glory ; he ueverundertookanywar, unless through necessity, and though eminently skilled and successful in the command of ar- mies, always blamed the proud spirit of Marius, Sylla, and other such conquerors, whom he said it should be his constant endeavor to re- semble as little as possible. His inclinations were naturally violent* but kept under restraint ; and, if he committed any fault contrary to his usual clemency and meekness, he soon repaired it in a manner which did honor to his character. Hence the Holy Fathers, eccle- siastical authors and councils, are unanimous in. proposing Theodo- sius as a model for Christian princes. Pagan writers themselves, with the exception of the furious Zozimus, agree in praising his ex- traordmary merit and qualifications ; Aurelius Victor, in particular, does not hesitate to represent him as an accomplished hero, far supe- rior to Trajan, whose eminent qualities he possessed without any of his vices. The same historian adds that the virtue of Theodosius continually increased with his prosperity and victories ; a praise which, to every reflecting mind, must appear the most honorable encomium. A. D. 395 4:23.] HONORIUS, ETC. 123 HONORIUS AND ARCADIUS.— a. d. 395—423. From the death of Theodosius must be dated the final decline of the empire. He had maintained it in its former greatness; he left it in all Its glory to his sons Honorius and Arcadius; but he could not transmit to these young princes his consummate prudence, valor and ability. Their want of talent, resolution and energy left them almost constantly exposed to the insults of barbarians, and to the ambitious intrigues of their own ministers. Arcadius, the elder of the two, was emperor of the East. His reign, which lasted thirteen years, offers nothing remarkable, except the ravages of ihe Huns in Thrace, and of the Isaurians in Lesser Asia; the power, ambition and miserable death of Rufinus, Eutro- pius and Gainas, who successively supplanted each other at court; and the unjust persecution carried on by jealous enemies agamst the illustrious St. John Chrysostom, archbishop of Constantinople, who died in exile (a. d. 407), after having filled the whole world with the lame of his golden eloquence. Arcadius died one year after him, and was succeeded by his son Theodosius the younger. The reign of Honorius in the western part of the empire, was longer and still more disastrous than that of his brother Arcadius. Its various calamities originated chiefly in the vacillating conduct of his prime minister Stilico, who, having raised himself to that high station by important services under Theodosius afterwards listened only to the suggestions of his unbounded ambition ; defending or be- traying the stale, as best suited his own interest. At first, all things were prosperous under him; he destroyed two numerous armies of Goths and other barbarians who had invaded Italy, one conducted by Alaric, whom he obliged to retreat beyond the Alps (a. d. 402); the other commanded by Radagasius, who lost nearly all his troops and was himself slain near Florence (405). Soon -xfter this defeat, other hordes of barbarians made a successful irruption into the empire, and crossing the Rhine (406), began to conquer its richest provinces, encouraged, it is believed, by Stilico himself. The design of that ambitious man seems to have been to throw insuperable difficulties in the way of Honorius, in order to undermine his power, if he would not consent to resign nis crown. To convince Honorius of the plot contrived by his minister, was no easy task; at length, he opened his eyes, and was so readily seconded by the troops, that the traitor and all his partisans suffered capital punishment, most of them however without the orders of the empe- ror, who endeavored, but iu vain, to check the fury of the soldiery. 124 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 2. The detection of the intrigues of Stilico did not stop the progresa of the Barbarians. Whilst the Alemanni on the one side, and the Burgandians on the other, occupied the territories along the Rhine, the Suevi, Alans and Vandals proceeded farther, and during three successive years plundered the different provinces and cities of GauL After this, in 409, they passed over to Spain, where they setded, the Suevi in the north, the Alans in the west, and the Vandals in the south, the eastern part only being left to the Romans. But the most formidable of all the enemies of Rome was Alaric, the leader of the Goths. Driven away some years before, he re-en- tered Italy with an ardent desire of avenging his defeat. Honorius and kis court, whose residence was then at Ravenna near the Adri- atic sea, opposed to him only protracted negotiations and ineffectual promises, a mode of defence more calculated to inflame the indigna- tion, than to check the progress of a warlike chieftain. Rome was besieged, and after enduring the horrors of a cruel famine, was taken by surprise and treason during the night. The conqueror gave it up to be plundered by his soldiers, who accordmgly spreading them- selves through every quarter of the city, soon produced a scene of general desolation ; many buildings were fired, and a furious tempest served at the same time, to increase the devastation spread by the barbarians (a. d. 410). Thus did Rome lose, in the space of a few hours, that power, splendor and magnificence which had made it, for so many ages, the first city in the world. Numbers of its inhabitants fled in all direc- tions, even to the most distant provinces, carrying every where the news of the great catastrophe of which they were the victims. This event was, even in countries the most remote, a subject of deep griefj and the sight of so many illustrious families now reduced to the utmost distress, excited universal commiseration, as St. Augustine and St. Jerome relate.* Still Rome, not having been totally destroyed, continued to subsist, and even repaired in a great measure its losses . but being once debased by the Goths, it became a sort of by- word among other barbarians, and its majesty as capital of the Roman empire, had departed for ever. Alaric did not think proper to retain his conquest, but setting out after a few days, he pursued his march without obstacle towards the (southern extremity of Italy. His intention was, to pass over the strait into Sicily, and thence to Africa, where he thought he could obtain a • St. August. De Civ. Dei. lib. I, c. 33 ; — St. Jerome, Epid. ad Principi- am, ei lib. Ill, in Ezech. — They themselves were visited by several of these noble fufi^itives ; and they showed, by their conduct on this occasion, that the charity which animated their hearts, was not less admirable than the genius and learning which have raised them to the first rank among the doctors of the Church. A. D. 395 — 423.] HONORIUS, ETC. 125 more desirable and permanent settlement; but a violent storm coua- teracted his measures, and death put an end to all his designs. He W£is carried off by a violent disease, and left the conduct of the Goths to Ataulphus, his brother-in-law, and the faithful cortipanion of liia victorious campaigns. His followers regretted him as the hero of their nation, and the chief author of the great power and influence which they had acquired in western Europe. According to the cus- tom of northern barbarians, of concealing the sepulchres of extraor- dinary men, they changed for a while the course of a small river near Cozenza, and having dug a deep grave in the bed of the channel, deposited there the body of Alaric with many valuable objects, and afterwards made the waters resume their former course. The Goths now returned to the north of Italy, and advanced into Gaul, where they had to encounter many obstacles in their endeavors to effect a settlement : at length, they were permitted by the Romans, under certain conditions, to occupy the provinces contiguous to the Pyrenees. For this advantageous treaty the Gothic nation was indebted chiefly to the abilities of king Vallia, the third successor of Alaric. About this time also, the Romans began to lose their influence in Great Britain. Honorius having recalled from that distant province its tegionary troops whose presence was necessary to repel dangers nearer home, the whole country remained exposed to the inroads of the Picts and Scots, two tribes inhabiting the north of the island. Some troops, it is true, were again sent to assist the Britons and drive back their foes ; but as these succors were granted only for a time, the restless Picts and Scots renewed their depredations with success and perseverance for nearly forty years, so as to render the country as miserable, during that lime, as it had been prosperous under the Romans. To the close of the career of Honorius many writers trace back the Oeginning of the French monarchy. According to them, the Franks, a powerful German tribe, crossed the Rhine in the year 420 with Pharamond their king, and wrested the north of Gaul from the Ro- mans ; but others believe that their first real settlement upon the Ro- man territories must be referred only to the year 438 or 440, during the reign of King Clodio. Be this as it may, it is certain that in ge- neral the affairs of the empire, during the latter part of the reign of Honorius, wore a more favorable appearance. Several provinces were delivered from the yoke of usurpation and tyranny, and a suc- cessful check was given for a time to the progress of the barbarians. The principal author of these happy changes was Constantius, a man of uncommon ability and virtue which he displayed during ten years by tne prudence with which he directed poUtical operations, and by il* L26 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 2. the glory which he acquired in commanding the armies. As a re- ward for so maLy services, Honorius, besides giving him his sister Placidia in marriage, conferred on him the title of Augustus, a title which he did not enjoy more than seven months; he received it in February, and died in the following September (a. d. 421). Not long after (in 423,) Honorius himself died at the age of thirty-nine, after a reign of twenty-eight years : a prince, not altogether unworthy of esteem, if we consider his beneficent intentions and private virtues ; but certainly unfit, from his want of resolution and capacity, to govern tlie state, especially in the calamitous and disorderly times in which he lived. VALENTINIAN III, IN THE WEST ;— IN THE EAST, THEO- DOSIUS II OR THE YOUNGER.— a. d. 424—455. The late emperor having left no children, his crown was, with some difficulty transferred to young Valentinian, his nephew, the son of Placidia and Constantius. This young prince received from his mother a religious education, but profited so little by it, that he is more known in history for his effeminate and dissolute life, than for any active share that he took in the important transactions of his reign. Theodosius the younger still reigned in the East, as he had done since the death of his father Arcadius. During his childhood, the state was governed first by the prefect Anlhemius, a man truly de- serving of his high office, which he held six years. This able min* ister repelled foreign invasions, fortified the frontiers, built new walls around Constantinople, and procured for the empire a profound peace. Afterwards, Theodosius being yet too young and inexperi- enced, the governing power was intrusted to his sister Pulcheria, who, though but sixteen years old, already evinced extraordinary prudence and a vigor of mind eqiial to her piety. At home, she pre- served good order and tranquillity, and at the same time caused the Roman name to be respected abroad. A new war having become accessary against the Persians, all its operations and various cam- paigns were so successfully conducted, that King Varanes V saw iiimself obliged, after many defeats, to consent to a treaty of peace on .the conditions dictated by the court of Constantinople. Unfortunately, Theodosius did not always act conformably to the views and counsels of his sister, but suffered his mind to be prepos- sessed against her by the intrigues of crafty and ambitious persons, desirous to have a greater share in the government. From that time, the prosperity of the state rapidly declined. Many provinces were A. D. 424 — 455.] VALENTINIAN III., ETC. 127 laid waste by the barbarians on different sides, and the honor of the empire was trampled under foot by Attila, the fierce king of the Huns, who forced Theodosius to pay him an annual tribute equally onerous and disgraceful. These evils originated in the weakness and indolence of the emperor himself; for, though he possessed the quali- fications of a good scholar, and most of the virtues that can be de- aired in a private man, he knew neither how to govern and command, nor how to choose good ministers and generals. The West from a variety of causes, continued still to be the theatre of more complicated and calamitous events. There existed, at this time, two men whose talents did equal honor to the state, viz.. General ^tius, and Count Boniface, governor of Africa. The for- mer was justly renowned as a commander and a politician, but so high-minded, that he could not brook the idea of any one being his equal in talents and glory. The latter, as brave and skilful perhaps as^tius himself, surpassed him in moderation and disinterestedness; still he had not fortitude enough to submit patiently to great injustice. ^tius, whose design was to ruin Boniface, secretly wrote to him under the mask of friendship, to let him know that he was in great danger; the empress Placidia being now so incensed against him, that, in case of his return to court, his death would inevitably follow. On the other hand, the artful impostor persuaded the empress that Boniface sought to make himself independent in Africa, adding, with great protestations of zeal for her interest, that the only prudent course she could adopt was to recall him without delay, and, should he refuse to obey her order, to treat him as a rebel. Placidia, not suspecting any treachery, followed this advice without further inquiry. Boniface received a summons to leave Africa ; but as he himself entertained strong suspicions of the designs of the cour'* instead of obeying, he raised troops to oppose those sent against hiiii and thus, by the very means which he selected to prove his inno- cence, became really guilty. Not long after, both he and Placidia discovered the imposture of ^tius, but its evil consequences were now irreparable. Boniface had already called to his aid and intro- duced into Africa the Vandals of Spain, whom he could not after- wards expel, when he returned to a sense of his duty. These barba- nans, having at their head Genseric, a warlike and sanguinary prince, overran the whole country with the rapidity of a torrent. Those rich and fertile provinces, whose inhabitants had provoked by their cor- ruption and vices the wrath of God, were soon deluged with blood and covered with ashes. The Vandals established in the midst of these ruins of the Roman power, the seat of their own domination, which lasted one hundred and six years (from 428 to 534), when Africa was restored to the enipire by the arms of Belisarius. 128 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 2. In the meanwhile, the empress durst not punish the perfidy of iEtius^ who was more powerful than herself. All she could do against him was to bestow new dignities and all possible marks of distinction on Count Boniface, with whom she was now perfectly reconciled. This was adding fuel o the flame ; and, as ^Etius considered the increase of authority in his rival as derogatory from his own, the two generals took the field in support of their respective pretensions. In the battle that ensued, Boniface v/as victorious ; but his success cost him his hfe : he received a dangerous wound, of which he died at the expira- tion of three months (a. d. 432). No longer seeing a rival in his way, ^Etius thought of repairing, by glorious services, the disasters which his jealousy had brought upon the state. He, from that time, showed himself an insuperable barrier against all the attacks of foreign enemies, defeated the Goths in the south of Gaul, the Franks in the north, and other barbarians near the frontiers of Germany and Italy. Shortly after these achieve- ments, a new and most furious storm arose from the East, which engaged all his attention and required all the exertions of his courage. Attila, king of the Huns, and leader of an immense multitude of barbarians gathered from the north of Asia and Europe, intended to ransom and plunder the western, as he had done the eastern pro- vinces of the empire. He advanced towards Gaul with an army of five hundred, or, according to some authors, of seven hundred thou- sand men, leaving every where so dreadful marks of his passage, that he was justly called, and called himself the Scourge of God. His very countenance was terrific: he had an enormous head, small and bright eyes, a flat nose, a swarthy complexion, and he appeared, in aU his deportment, haughty, fierce and threatening. In the year 451, this terrible conqueror crossed the Rhine, and pene- trated into the heart of Gaul, sacking and burning all the towns in his way. At last, he was stopped before the walls of Orleans by a vigorous and lasting resistance. In the meanwhile, ^tius, who had induced the Visigoths and the Franks to unite with him against the common enemy, was hastening to the rehef of the town; he arrived just in time to save it from destruction. The Huns, having broken the gates, were beginning to enter and plunder the city, when ^tius, coming from the opposite direction, suddenly appeared whh his army, and immediately charged the barbarians. Their surprise and terror were equal to the suddenness and violence of the attack. Those who had already lost themselves in the streets, were slain or compelled tc fly, whilst Attila, foaming with rage, endeavored to rally the fugitives without the city. He then began to retreat towards the Rhine; iEtius closely followed him at the head of his troops and allies, and overtook him in the vast plains of Chalons in Champaigne. A. D. 424 — 455.] VALENTINIAN III., ETC. 129 Europe had never beheld two armies so numerous as these in presence of one another; the army of ^tius, it is said, was almost equal to that of Attila. The whole plain, as far as the eye could reach, being filled with a coundess multitude of battalions bristling with iron and brass, exhibited for some moments a most imposing spectacle, which was soon changed mto a frightful scene by the fury of the combatants. The king of the Huns animated his troops by word and example; iEtius displayed that consummate skill and intrepidity, for which he has been surnamed the last of the Romans. Like him, his soldiers fought with wonderful courage; still, it ap- pears that the Visigoths won, on that famous day, the prize of valor and had the principal share in the victory. After having broken and routed the enemy's left wing, they fell with such irresistible fury upon the centre of the Huns, that Attila himself was in great dan- ger. Frightened, for the first time in his life, he abandoned to the Romans and their allies the field of battle strewed with one hundred and eighty thousand, some say, nearly three hundred thousand dead bodies. Horrible indeed must the slaughter have been, since, accord- ing to the common report of historians, a little neighboring stream was swelled hke a torrent, by the quantity of blood which flowed into its channel. The battle having finished only at dusk, the confederates were not certain of their advantage till the day following. The joy of the vic- tory which they had gained was damped by the consideration of their own loss, and particularly by the death of king Theodoric, who had been killed whilst bravely fighting at the head of his Visigoths. Elis body was found among heaps of the slain, and buried with great honors on the field of battle. Then ^tius dismissed his allies, in the just hope that the Roman militia would now be sufficient to drive the enemy from Gaul; nor was he disappointed: Attila, though still proud and eager for revenge, removed his camp, and retired beyond the Rhine. No later than the ensuing year (452), this undaunted conqueror reappeared, and revenged himself for the terrible blow he had re- ceived in Gaul, by plundering and laying waste the northern part of Italy. He' first laid siege to the important and well fortified city of Aquileia. This celebrated town had, fifty-two years before, repelled the combined eff'orts of Radagasius and Alaric, and now resisted for three months all the attacks of Attila. The Huns were dispirited, and their leader himself began to think oi" abandoning the siege, when he perceived storks flying with their httle ones from the town into the country. Struck at the circumstance, and skilfully turning it to his advantage, he told his soldiers that, without doubt, the precipitate re- treat of those birds from Aquileia was an omen of the city's impendmg 130 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 2. ruin. This was enough to revive the courage of the Huns ; they renewed the attack with fresh ardor, hatlered the walls with all their machines, and having made a large breach, rushed into the place with a fury proportioned to the resistance which they had experi- enced. The garrison and inhabitants were either put to the sword or reduced to slavery, and the town was consigned to the flames. This conquest enabled the Huns to advance without obstacle; ^tius, whose forces were now quite inferior to theirs, did not dare oppose the march of the main body of their troops, but contented himself with cutting in pieces the scouts and exploring detachments. Pouring into the fertile plains of Italy, they destroyed all before them with fire and sword, sacked Milan, destroyed Padua with many other cities, and depopulated entire provinces. The whole country on the left side of the river Po, was one continued scene of carnage and devastation. Such of the inhabitants as had time to avoid this destructive storm, retired into the small islands at the extremity of the Adriatic Gulf, where they laid the foundation of the noble city and republic of Venice. The weak emperor Valentinian was on the point of abandoning Italy, and the Romans, in the utmost terror, expected soon to see the barbarians before their gates. In this general consternation. Pope St. Leo, at the request of the emperor and of the whole city of Rome, v/ent to meet Atiila, in hopes of molhfying his rage and preventing his further progress. Avienus, a man of consular dignity, and Trigetius, who had been prefect of Rome, were deputed to accompany him in this embassy. They found the haughty monarch at Ambuleium near Mantua. Contrary to the general expectation, he received the Pope with great honor, and gave him a favorable audience : St. Leo, on his part, ad- dressed the barbarian with so much energy, eloquence and dignity, that he gained the admiration of all, and especially of Attila, who, on his proposal, concluded a treaty of peace with the empire, under the condition of an annual tribute. The king immediately com- manded his army to cease hostilities, and soon after recrossed the Alps, to retire into his own dominions near the Danube; but, on his way home, he was seized with a violent vomiting of blood, of which he died in 453. The Huns buried him with the same lienors and precautions, wherewith the Goths had buried their king Alaric forty- three years before. As to the vast empire which that extraordinary man had founded, it disappeared with him, in consequence of the civil wars that broke out among his children and vassals. ^tius did not outlive himrnore than one year, being destroyed by an intrigue similar to that which he himself had formerly used against Count Boniface. A charge of conspiracy having been se- cretly brought against him at court, he was summoned to the palace j A. D. 455 — 476.] MARCiAN, E re. 181 he obeyed, and on liis arrival, the emferor slew him with a sword. By this crime, the blind and wretched Valentinian deprived his per- son and crown of the only defender whom he might successfully oppose to his numerous enemies. One of his attendants gave him to understand this fully, when, being asked what he thought of the death of ^tius, he answered that the emperor had cut off his own right hand with the left. A few months after (a. d. 455), Va- lentinian was murdered in the midst of Rome by some discontented officers, the chief of whom was a certain Maximus, who immediate- seized upon the imperial throne. That unhappy prince had lived thirty-six, and reigned about thirty years, if he may be said to have reigned, who was almost constantly a slave to the interested will of others as well as to his own passions, which he never controlled. Notwithstanding his vices and the faults of his government, Valen- tinian was regretted by many persons : his widow, Eudoxia, carried her resentment against the murderers so far, as to call the Vandals from Africa to avenge his death. No proposal could be more pleas- ing to that nation always eager for pillage; they hastened to cross the sea with a numerous fleet, and going up the Tiber, entered Rome before the close of the same year 455. At this time, St. Leo Avas no« able to avert the storm, but he succeeded at least in obtaining from Genseric, though an Arian and a violent persecutor of the Catholics in his own kingdom, that the buildings of the city and the lives of the inhabitants should be spared. Accordingly, the Vandals content- ed themselves with taking a certain number of prisoners fogether with the riches of Rome, and returned to Carthage loaded with booty. MARCIAN.— LEO THE THRACIAN, IN THE EAST. LAST PERIOD AND FALL OF THE WESTERN EMPIRE. — 455 — 476. Theodosius II died in the year 450, of a fall from his horse, at the age of fifty, after a reign of forty-two years. No one was better quahfied to succeed him than his sister Pulcheria; still, as no woman had ever reigned alone in either empire, she married and proclaimed emperor, Marcian, a brave and virtuous officer, who by his merit had raised himself from the condition of a common soldier to a conspicu- ous rank in both the army and the state. No sooner was he acknowledged emperor, than ae began to rescue tlie empire from that state of ignominy and dejection to which it had been reduced by the barbarians. When Attila, before setting out for his expedition into Gaul, sent to the court of Constantinople to re- 132 MODERN HISTORY. [PARl 2. ceive the payment of the annual tribute stipulated by Theodosius II, Marcian answered the deputies that, reserving gold for his friends, he had nothing but iron and steel for his enemies. Towards his sub- jects he behaved as a true father. Being surrounded by excellent counsellors of his own choice, he devoted with them all his care :o restore security and abundance, procure the exact administration of justice, remove unworthy men from pubhc employments, diminish the taxes, check the course of public and private calamities, relieve ihe poor and distressed, in a word, to bestow benefits on all, as far as prudence and the state of the exchequer permitted. The object that chiefly engaged Marcian's attention was the cause of the true faith, which demanded his cooperation against various enemies in the East. Of late, a succession of violent storms had been raised against it by two opposite heresies, the Nestorian, which denied the unity of person in Christ, and the Eutychian, which at- tacked the distinction of his two natures. The former of these errors, both equally hostile to the mystery of the Incarnation, had been al- ready condemned by the general -councli of Ephesus, held in 431; against the latter, the council of Chalcedon, the fourth of the general councils, was, by the authoricy of Pope St. Leo, and through the care of Marcian, assembled in 451. Besides renewing the condemnation of the Nestorian, it solemnly proscribed the Eutychian doctrmes; and such of the abettors of either as refused to submit, were considered as no longer belonging to the Church of Christ: they henceforth formed separate societies, which are still extant in Asia. Marcian was not less distinguished for his domestic virtues, than for his public conduct. Nothing appeared in him but sincere piety and modesty, beneficence, disinterestedness, and admirable purity of life. His reign, deservedly called the golden age of the Eastern em- pire, was, if not the most conspicuous in every respect, at least the most prosperous and irreprehensible. Unfortunately, it did not last more than six years and five months ; this excellent emperor died in January 457, at the age of sixty-five. Leo, the Thracian, who succeeded him, and reigned about seven- teen years, also shewed great zeal for religion. He was well fitted for the sovereign power, though not so talented or successful as his predecessor. A powerful fleet which he sent Eigainst Genseric, was entirely defeated; but he gained signal victories over the barbarians o{ the north, and, in general, maintained his dominions in that state of respectability in which they had been left by Marcian. He died it the year 474, and Genseric, that terrible conqueror whom we have often mentioned, followed nim to the grave three years later, aftei having during half a century inflicted on the Romans, in every part of their dominions, all the injury in his power. A. D. 455 — 476.] MARCIAN, ETC. 133 The Western empire was now in the last stage of its existence. After the death of Valentinian III, and of the usurper Maximus (a. d. 455), Avitus, a senator of great repute, was acknowledged emperor in their place: still, the greater portion of the authority soon fell into the hands of Ricimer, a general of Suevian extraction, who was equally capable of noble deeds and great crimes; prudent and eloquent, skil- ful and intrepid, but devoid of true honor, fidelity and gratitude, and guided only by his ambition. He might, at three different times, have assumed the purple; but he preferred to confer it on others, whom he raised and afterwards destroyed in the most capricious manner. Within the short space of twenty-one years, no fewer than eight emperors successively appeared and disappeared; viz. Avitus, whose reign commenced in 455. Majorien 457. Libius-Severus 461. Anthemius 467. Olybrius 472. Glycerius 473. Julius-Nepos 474. Romulus-Agustulus 475. Some of these emperors were men of great merit, and, in more fa- vorable circumstances, might have reigned with glory. Majorien es- pecially, and nearly the same might be said of Anthemius, was not .ess commendable for his moral and mental qualities than for his mili- tary acquirements ; but these two emperors incurred the displeasure of Ricimer, by not leaving the government in his hands, and were put to death by that ambitious and cruel minister. Notwithstanding so many revolutions and enormities, Ricimer vigorously repulsed the various foes who were striving to complete the dismemberment of the empire. Death alone put a stop to his career of crimes and victories (a, d. 472). The last emperor of the West, by a singular coincidence, bore the names both of the founder of the city (Romulus), and of the founder of the empire of Rome (Augustus); being called Romulus-Augus- tus, or Augustulus (on account of his youth). At that time, the Romans, blended with other nations which continually poured into tneir territory, had no longer any attachment either for the imperial government, or for emperors who could not defend them against their enemies. Odoacer, king of the Hcruli, taking advantage of the apathy of the people, easily overthrew a tottering throne, the fall of ■which was accelerated by its own weakness. He attacked Augustulus in Raver.na, and, having made himself master of tlie town, deprived him of the purple, though, through compassion for his age, he spared 12 134 MODEKN HISTORY. [PART 2. his life, and even granted him an honorable retreat near Naples. The conqueror found no greater difficulty in subduing Pavia, Rome, and all Italy, of which he was proclaimed liing (a. d. 476). Thus was the Roman empire destroyed in the West, twelve hun- dred and twenty-nine years after the building of Rome, five hundred and seven after the battle of Actium. Its fall, long since prepared by the weakness of many emperors and the despotism of armies, by civil wars and foreign invasions, was scarcely noticed in the world ; it dis- appeared without any violent commotion, like a man full of years, who dies of decrepitude. The Eastern empire, being less exposed to foreign attacks, and better defended by its capital and frontiers, suo- sisted yet for many centuries, during which its history is connected with that of nations of more recent origin; but it never attained the power, splendor and wealth, which had distinguished ancient Rome. Amidst so many disturbances and revolutions, religion alone fully maintained her influence and dignity. Far from yielding to the vio- lence of the storms which shook the social world to its very centre, she exercised her divine power over the very conquerors of Rome, and, being founded upon an immovable rock by the hand of God himself, she triumphed over them, as she had formerly triumphed over her pagan persecutors. Even at this disastrous and turbulent period, she began to tame and civilize those fierce barbarians who before acknowledged no law but that of the sword. Divine Provi- dence seemed to have permitted their irruptions into the Roman provinces for no other view than to destroy, through their means, the last remains of idolatry, and efiect their own happy conversion to the laws of the Gospel. On the other hand, the inhabitants of the invaded countries were led to understand, in the midst of their suf- ferings, that all was not lost for them, but that they would find a sure refuge in the Church of Christ. PART III. FEOM THE DOWNFALL OF THE WESTERN EMPIRE (A. D. 476), TO ITS REVIVAL UNDER CHARLEMAGNE (A. D. 800). FOUNDATION OF THE PRINCIPAL AND MOST CELEBRATED STATES OF EUROPE. From the overthrow of the Western empire we may date the foundation of the principal states now extant in Europe. The northern tribes by whose multiphed efforts its entire ruin was effected or accelerated, vied with each other in taking speedy possession of its fairest provinces. The conquests of the Vandals and of the Heruli having been already mentioned, "vve have to speak at present of the still more successful and celebrated estabhshment of the Anglo-Saxons in Great Britain, of the Visigoths in Spain, of the Franks in Gaul, and of the Ostrogoths in Italy. $ L— ANGLO-SAXONS IN GREAT BRITAIN. HENGIST.— 449— 488. Ever since the time when the Roman troops were totally with- drawn from Great Britain, the Picts and Scots seized every favorable opportunity to renew their inroads. District after district became a scene of devastation, and the misery of the natives increased every day, till finding the-mselves destitute of all resources at home, they at length resolved to call in as auxiliaries a body of Saxons, who, having sailed from the north of Germany, were then cruising in the channel along the coast in quest of plunder. Adventurers like these could not fail to comply with a request which they justly presumed would turn to their own advantage. For six years (449 — 455) they fought the battles of the natives with great fidelity and success. But 136 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 3. having by this time invited great numbers of their countrymen, to whom the Angles, another German tribe, willingly joined themselves, they excited the jealousy and alarms of the Britons, who refused them an increased supply of provisions. This was the signal for a war which proved most fatal to the liber- ty of the natives. The Anglo-Saxons conquered them in many battles, and began to bring under subjection the country which they had just defended against the Scottish invaders. Their first settle ment upon the British territory was that of Kent, which the valiant chieftain Hengist gained and secured by a series of bloody victories, from the year 455 to 473, and which, at his death, in 488, he left in a prosperous condition to his son ^sca. The work of conquest was continued after him, and, though the Britons fought with great valor, and sometimes with success, for the independence of their country, their efforts ultimately proved fruitless, and the greater part of the island was subjugated by the Anglo-Saxons, who, changing its name, laws and constitution, estabhshed ui it seven independent kingdoms, commonly called the Heptarchy. By this conquest, the whole of the country was replunged mto the state of barbarism from which it had been rescued by the Ro- mans. It remained in that state until the close of the sixth century, when its conquerors received the light of the Gospel through the pious zeal of St, Augustine and forty other missionaries sent from Rome by Pope St. Gregory the Great. The natives, as soon as they found resistance useless, fled with their most valuable effects to the hills and forests, to escape from the exterminating sword of the inva- ders. Multitudes found a secure asylum in the craggy and moun tainous districts of the country of Wales, which they henceforth occupied for many centuries. Others, crossing the ocean, landed on the western extremity of Armorica in Gaul, where they made per- manent settlements, and gave to the new tract they inhabited the name of Brittany (Bretagne), which it still retains. § II.— VISIGOTHS IN SPAIN. EVARIC— A. D. 466—484. The conquests of the Visigoths, or Western Goths, in Spam, were more rapid than those of the Anglo-Saxons in Britain. Their king Evaric, taking advantage of the weakness and continual change of the last Roman emperors, sent a powerful army from the south of Gaul to the nearest provinces beyond the Pyrenees. The success of A. D. 466 — 4:84:.] VISIGOTHS IN SPAIN, ETC. 137 ihis expedition was astonishing: the Tcry strongest towns opened their gates, and the natives, defeated in a great battle, abandoned a considerable portion of their country to the enemy. Upon this, Evaric himself arrived at the head of fresh troops j the war was prosecuted with redoubled vigor; nothing could resist his arms, nor impede his progress, and with the exception of a few northern pro- vinces occupied by the Suevians, the whole peninsula submitted to his power (a. d. 473). This warlike prince subdued also the portion of Aquitania not yel in his possession, and many other provinces in Gaul. The name of Evaric was now respected abroad : his court which he established at Bordeaux, beheld ambassadors from all the neighboring nations pay- ing homage to him as to the mightiest monarch of western Europe ; and this high reputation he enjoyed until his death. But, besides being a powerful conqueror and the founder of the kingdom of the Visigoths in Spain, Evaric wished also to be the legislator of his people. Until then, the Gothic legislation was very limited, consisting only of some statutes of their kings, which had little authority among them, and were frequently disregarded in prac- tice. Evaric published a collection of those ancient laws, and added to them new regulations peculiarly adapted to the time, place and other circumstances. Well aware that on their faithful observance depended his personal safety as well as the prosperity of the state, he carefully enforced their execution, and thus began to accustom the Visigoths to the duties and practices of social hfe. Evaric died at Aries in 484, after a glorious reign of eighteen years. His uncommon talent for war and civil administration would have still more entitled him to the praises of posterity, had he not, through ambition, stained his hand with the blood of his brother Theodoric II, and, through sectarian intolerance, treated his Catholic subjects with excessive rigor, he himself being an obstinate Arian. Great however were the civil benefits he bestowed on his own people ; the conquest of the peninsula, especially, was so much the more fortunate for the Visigoths, as they were on the point of being expelled from their pos- sessions in Gaul by a still greater conqueror, and of being compelled to confine themselves to their newly acquired and more lasting king- dom of Spain. !&• 138 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 3. $ III^FRANKS IN GAUL. CLOVIS— A. D. 481—511. This conqueror was Clovis, king of the Franks, who, for the mag- nitude and important consequences of his exploits, is justly considered the real founder of the French monarchy. The Franks were not at first a single nation distinct from all others, but made up of several Ger- man tribes which had, long before, entered into a confederacy for the support of their independence. During the greater part of the fifth century, under four successive kings, they made frequent irruptions into Gaul, and took possession of its northern frontiers ; Clovis, more enterprising, undertook, at the early age of twenty years, to bring it entirely under his power. His first opponent was Syagrius, a brave general, who had formed a small state for himself in the north of Gaul on the ruins of the Ro- man empire. Clovis attacked him near Soissons (a. d. 486), and gained so complete a victory, that Syagrius, being left almost alone in his party, fled for refuge to the court of Alaric II, king of the Visi- goths. Nor could this asylum save him from the hands of his vic- torious enemy. Clovis compelled Alaric, by threats and terrors, to deliver up the unfortunate general whom he put to death, and, by this act of cruel policy, remained in full possession of his territory. After the lapse of some years, the French king was obliged, in con- sequence of a sudden invasion of the Alemanni, to carry his arms to the banks of the Rhine. An obstinate battle was fought at Tolbiac, near Cologne, in which the Franks, almost entirely routed in the be- ginning, remained in the end masters of the field. It was after this unexpected triumph, which Clovis himself attributed to a special pro- tection of the true God whom he had invoked during the contest, that both he and his nation, abandoning the worship of idols, embraced the Christian faith (a. d. 496). During the course of the ensuing years, Clovis, always active and fond of conquests, continued to enlarge his empire. Either by force of arms, or by negotiations and treaties, he obliged the Arborici (inha- bitants of Belgium) to acknowledge him for their king, subdued Ba- varia, and rendered the Burgundians his tributaries. This rapid in- crease of power in the French monarch was a source of uneasiness and alarm for his neighbors, particularly for Alaric, king of the Visi- goths : fearing for his own territory, he raised troops for its defence. Nothing 'could be more consonant than this with the designs of Clo- vis, as it afforded him an occasion of declaring an open war, and A. D. 481 — 511.] FKANKS IN GAUL, ETC. 189 strildng at once a signal blow. He marched with his usual rapidity, crossed the river Loire, came up with the army of the Visigoths near Poitiers, and forced them to engage in a general battle (a. d. 507). After a sanguinary contest, victory declared in favor of Clovis. With his own hand he struck Alaric dead j the Visigoths then fled with all possible speed, their conquerors pursuing them in every direction. In less than two years, Clovis subdued nearly all their possessions between the Loire and the Pyrenees, and thus nearly extinguished their domination in Gaul ; he would even have carried his advantages farther, had not a considerable body of his troops been defeated, near Aries, by those of Theodoric, king of Italy. Still, this defeat did not deprive Clovis of the principal fruit of his labors. He preserved his former conquests, and returning to the north of Gaul, or rather France, as we shall henceforth call it, fixed his residence in Paris. The extraordinary reputation he had gained, being now far spread, and causing a great sensation even at the court of Constantinople, the emperor Anastasius sent him the ornaments of the consulship, as a mark of his esteem and alliance. Unfortunately, Clovis did not preserve his glory pure and entire to the end, but sul lied it by several acts of cruelty against the princes of his own kin- dred, whose estates he wished to invade. He died in 511, at the age of forty-five, after a reign of thirty years, leaving his kingdom to be divided among four sons : a mode of succession which was followed after him on different occasions, and became a source of numberless disasters and civil wars. Although the government of Clovis had been rather military and despotic, it evinced on many points a wise and skilful policy. He did not, barbarian like, expel the natives from the provinces which he subdued, nor deprive them of their liberty and all their property ; he only required that the lands of the country should be divided be- tween them and his followers ; whence it followed that the two nations, living and dwelling together upon the same soil, were soon blended into one people. He also published a code of laws, one of which declared women unfit to inherit such estates as had been ob- tained by arms and conquest ; and this gave rise to the fundamental regulation of the national constitution of France, according to which the French crown never devolved to women.* * That code was called the Salic law, from the tribe of the Saltan Franlca, to which Clovis belonged. The article which settled the right of succes- sion, became subsequently, when understood of the succession to the throne, a proverb thus expressed : Le royaume de France ne tombe point en qxienouille. 140 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 3. 5 IV.— OSTROGOTHS IN ITALY. THEODORIC THE GREAT.— (a. d. 493—526). Clotis, notwithstanding his justly renowned exploits and legisla- tion, was neither the greatest warrior nor the ablest politician of hii age, this praise being due rather to Theodoric, king of the eastern Goths or Ostrogoths. T^iis nation, after the dismemberment of Attila's empire, settled first m Pannonia near the Danube, but, being little satisfied with its residence, set out in 489 on an expedition against Italy. Odoacer, who was yet reigning there, did not fail to defend with courage a kingdom which he had now governed, during fourteen years, with great wisdom and glory. Still, victory every where followed the standard of Theodoric : three battles lost by Odoa- cer, and the vigor with which the Goths conducted the siege of the city of Ravenna where he had taken refuge, obliged him to come to an agreement with his conqueror. He was first treated with cor- diality ; till Theodoric, sacrificing justice and humanity to the cruel policy of the times, perfidiously put to death a prince worthy of a better fate (a. d. 493). But, if the Gothic monarch had recourse to so odious a means for the acquisition of a new kingdom, he on the other hand took the wisest and most efficient measures to secure its possession. One of the most successful was, to enter into a permanent alliance with the neighboring princes. Some of them he compelled to live at peace with him; others he attached to his family and to himself by ihe ties of aflSnity; with others, in fine, he assumed the tone of pa- rental authority, fully justified by his great wisdom and experience. ''You are young," he wrote to them, " and stand in need of good advice. Your ambition and imprudent behavior afflict me, and I cannot see with indifference that you are ruled by your passions." He was guided by these wise counsels himself, taking care not to enlarge his dominions by rashly exposing the Hfe of his people or violating the laws of equity. " Let others," said he, " wage war for tae sake of destruction and plunder ; as for me, my intention is, with the help of God, to conquer my enemies in such a manner, that the vanquished may be sorry for not having been before of the number of my subjects." No sooner did Theodoric see his power firmly established in Italy, than he undertook to civilize his people under the benign influence of its climate. He adopted for that purpose the Roman jurispru- dence, which he reduced to one hundred and fifty statutes, well A. D. 493 — 526.] OSTROGOTHS IN ITALY, ETC. 141 calculated, by the prudent rules and judicious maxims with which they abounded, to promote the pubhc utihty. He wished the Italians and the Goths, after a new division of the lands, to consider them- selves not only as allies, but even as kinsmen and brothers, being governed upon the same principles and by one who looked upon himself as their common father. The only distinction estabhshed between them was, that the carrying of arms and the performance of military duty were reserved to the Goths, whilst civil employ- ments and trades were left to the Romans. During the whole course of his reign, Theodoric proved the impartial benefactor of the two nations, and became equally endeared to both. Though an Arian by birth and education, instead of persecuting the orthodox, like the Vandal kings of Africa, his cotemporaries, he on the contrary favored and protected them; and so firm was his conviction, acquired by experience, of the disinterestedness and charity of the Catholic bishops, that he usually applied to them for the distribution of his alms to the poor and the exercise of his liberality towards the pro- vinces. This great prince knew how to gather around him and select for his counsellors, persons the most conspicuous for their merit and ability, such as Boetius, Cassiodorus, etc. Boetius was a man of consular dignity, of noble feelings and superior genius, which shine forth in all his writings, especially in his five books de Consolationc Pltibsophice. Cassiodorus, who was not less distinguished for his learning and virtue, is proposed chiefly as the model of a zealous, active and disinterested minister of state. After a most laborious life at court, he retired into a pleasant solitude in Calabria, where he de- voted the remainder of his days to study, writing, and religious exer- cises, and died at the age of about one hundred years. Thus was literature, so long after the Augustan age, still culti- vated with great success in Italy ; and, whilst the Franks, the Bur- gundians, and the Visigoths, had scarcely begun to learn the princi- ples of civilization, the court of Theodoric was the centre of learning and politeness. His palace was constantly open to talents and merit. To him Rome was indebted for the rebuilding of its wrIIs and the preservation of its ancient monuments; Ravenna, Pavia and other cities, were also repaired or embeUished. He protected every useful enterprise, revived agriculture and commerce, and procured so perfect a security to social intercourse, that neither citizens nor travellers had any thing to fear, either in the towns or in the country. The empire which Theodoric had founded, and which, by im- proving every fair occasion, he almost continually enlarged, wa5 very extensive. He reigned over Italy, Sicily, Dalinatia, Pannonia, Rhetia, Noricum, and some of the finest provinces of France and 142 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 3. Spain. But his glory, besides being already impaired by the unjust death of King Odoacer, was, like that of Clovis, much diminished by several subsequent acts of cruelty. Old age and infirmity made him suspicious. He listened to the slanders and false accusations ot jealous courtiers against the most respectable men of the state. Cas- eiodorus resigned his offices, and left the court : Boetius, and Sym- tnachus, his father-in-law, suffered capital punishment, without being convicted of any crime, and the holy Pope John I, was thrown into prison, where he died after a painful confinement of several months. Remorse for these acts soon assailed Theodoric. His bitter grief for his late cruelties, produced a melancholy which accelerated his death. Most historians relate that, being one day at table, when a large fish had been served up, he imagined he saw in the dish the head of Symmachus ; he withdrew terrified from the table, went to his bed, and expired, a prey to anguish and remorse, at the age of seventy-four years (a. d. 526). He had however sufficient time to proclaim, with the unanimous consent of those around him, his grand-son Athalaric for his successor, under the regency of Amala- sontes, mother of this young prince. The administration of Theodoric was, during thirty years (from 494 to 524), a model of excellent government in almost every respect. Having previously shown to the world what he could do on the field of battle, he appeared, all that time, a modest conqueror, a wise legislator, and a pacific monarch, who knew, by a happy mixture of severity and mildness, how to keep his victorious soldiers within the bounds of strict discipline, and to gain the hearts of his new sub- jects. When Belisarius conquered the Goths, he overthrew the statues of that great prince, but spared his sepulchre. It is yet extant in Ravenna, and attracts by its elevation, the admiration of travellers. EMPERORS OF CONSTANTINOPLE. JUSTIN I.— A. D 518—527. We must now revert to the Eastern empire, which began about this time to make a greater figure in the political world than it had done under its last sovereigns, Basiliscus, Zeno and Anastasius I. After them, Justin, an officer of obscure parentage, but renowned foi his valor, was judged worthy of the throne, at the advanced age of A. D. 518—527.] JUSTIN I. 143 sixty-eight (a. d. 518). It is remarkable that this emperor knew Qeither how to read nor write, and still rendered important services to tlie state, during the nine years of his reign. Having natural talent and a sound mind, which he improved by experience and by asking counsel of other prudent men, he easily perceived the course to be followed in difficult affairs, and always acted with wisdom and equity. He took particular care, on the one hand, to appoint able minis- ters and virtuous magistrates, and, on the other, to afford seasonable relief to his people in their calamities and disasters, which were then uncommonly frequent. But a short time before his elevation, a tre- mendous earthquake had desolated several parts of Illyria. For some days, a chasm immensely deep, about twelve feet wide, and extending to the distance of thirty miles, threw out sparks and flames, and swallowed up trees, rocks and houses. Some years be- fore, a dreadful conflagration had consumed many buildings in Con- stantinople, among others, that which contained the public library consisting of one hundred and twenty thousand volumes. An in- valuable copy of the works of Homer, written in golden letters on the skin of a serpent one hundred and twenty feet long, was lost on this occasion. Again, in the years 525 and 526, similar accidents desolated or destroyed many cities, especially the great city of Antioch, the capi- tal of Syria. About noon of the twenty-ninth of May (526), a sud- den and violent shaking of the ground overthrew the houses in the western part of the town; and, as the earthquake quickly reached the other quarters, nearly all the buildings fell, at the same moment, with a frightful crash. To this first evil, fire added its ravages. A subterraneous furnace, the usual attendant of earthquakes, ignited the very soil ; hot cinders were carried up by whirlwinds, and fell after- wards in the form of a fiery rain, which consumed the wood-work of the houses, whilst another fire, rising from the ground, augmented the conflagration. So unexpectedly did all those scourges come upon the inhabitants, that few of them could make their escape into the country ; and this great city, the most populous of the East, became all at once the common sepulchre of two hundred and fifty thousand persons. Most of them were crushed by the faUing of the houses, or consumed bv the flames ; but others met a fate which almost exceeds belief. Bands of robbers began to commit depredations in the midst of these scenes of destruction and death. Whilst numbers of unfortunate people, covered with bruises and wounds, were running in dismay through the streets and pubUc places in order to avoid impending ruin, they met murderers, who cruelly deprived them of life and took possession X44 MODERN" HISTORY. [PART 3. of their fortunes, and who, soon after, were themselves destroyed with their criminal booty. The deplorable spectacle of a city which barbarous conquerors have just taken by storm, would present but a faint idea of the deso- lation of Antioch. Some of the inhabitants, however, had the good fortune to escape from the ruins of theu: houses, under which they were for a time buried. Twenty or thirty days after, persons yet alive were taken from those sepulchres, where they had lived upon the victuals usually kept in families ; but a far greater number were found dead. This earthquake, the fifth that Antioch suffered since its foun- dation, was the most awful and disastrous. It lasted six days with uninterrupted violence, and during six iponths was felt at different times ; nor was the ground entirely setded till eighteen months after. The news of these calamitous events pierced the heart of the em- peror with grief. He presently despatched virtuous and trusty men, with considerable sums of money, to repair those cities which had suffered most, and rescue their surviving inhabitants from misery and despair ; we are told that, in rebuilding Antioch alone, he spent fifty millions of hvres (ten or twelve millions of dollars). It was in the course of these occupations, so worthy of a sovereign, that Jus- tin closed his useful career (527). A short time before his deatli, he associated his nephew Justinian in the imperial power, and, by his demise, left this prince in a condition to raise to its proper height the edifice of glory of which he had laid the first foundation. GLORIOUS REIGN OF JUSTINIAN— a. d. 527—565. The reign of Justinian forms an interesting epoch in the history of the Greek empire. The enlarged views of this prince, the union of favorable circumstances, the highly cultivated state of the science of law, and the brilliant successes obtained in different wars, equally contributed to render it glorious. Justinian, on his elevation to the throne, resolved to reconquer the western provinces which formerly belonged to the Romans, and to improve the civil legislation. This latter design he executed with the assistance of the ablest civilians of his age, particularly the famous and learned questor Tribonian. There already existed, it is true, different collections of laws, published under Adrian, Theodosius II, etc.; but all of them were defective. To become well acquainted with the ancient jurisprudence, it was necessary to peruse two thou- sand volumes containing, amidst several wise enactments, many in- accuracies and obscure passages, and even opposite and conlradic- A. D. 527 — 565.] JUSTINIAN. 145 tory statutes. Justinian undertook to introduce order into that chaos, by comprising in a work of moderate extent, both the general princi- ples of jurisprudence, and the best laws or judiciary sentences that had been promulgated before his time, during the space of thirteen hundred years. He first ordered a select collection to be made of the imperial sta- tutes, from the beginning of Adrian's reign. By the assiduity of Tribonian and his associates, the work was soon performed, and pub- lished under the name of the JVew or Justinian Code (a. d. 629), After three years more of immense labor, the Digest {Digestum), or Pandects (Pandectce), appeared in fifty books, containing the most equitable ordinances of ancient legislators with the best decisions of lawyers or civihans, under proper divisions and tides. To render the study of these books easier and more useful^ some introduction was necessary ; this was also made, and four other books, called Institutes, were promulgated, which not only are the key to the Roman juris- prudence, but even contain the fundamental principles of all legisla- tion. Of the different parts of the Justinian compilation, it is the best and most admirable. In fine, the emperor revised his Code, pub- hshed it again mor^ correctly in 534, and to the ordinances contained in it added a great number of new statutes,, the collection of which, under the title novellce, completed what we call the Roman or the CivU Law. Such was the origin of that famous body of laws, which, notwith- standing some imperfections, is the most remarkable that human wisdom ever produced. It was gradually adopted in several coun- tries; and it is moreover from that abundant source of social princi- ples, that the present states of Europe derive the better portion or supply the deficiency of their respective Codes.* • The history and character of the Roman jurisprudence are described with great erudition and sagacity by Chancellor Kent, in the twenty-third lecture of his Commentaries. His concluding remarks are these: "The civil law shows the proofs of the highest cultivation and refinement; and no one who peruses it can well avoicl the conviction, that it has been the fruitful source of those comprehensive views and solid principles, which have been applied to elevate and adorn the jurisprudence of modern na- tions The whole body of the civil law will excite never failing cu- riosity, and receive the homage of scholars, as a singular monument of wisdom. It fills such a large space in the eye of human reason; it regH- lates so many interests of man as a social and civilized being; it embodieg so much thought, refiection, experience and labor; it leads us so far into the recesses of antiquity, and it has stood so long against the waves and and weathers of time, that it is impossible, while engaged in the contempla- tion of the system, not to be struck with some portion of the awe and vene- ration which are felt in the midst of the solitudes of a majestic ruin." Com- mentaries on law, 2d edit., vol. i, pp. 547, 548. 13 146 MODKRN HISTORY. [PART 8. Whilst Justinian was engaged in this important work, he did nol forget the other design he had formed; viz., of reconquering the wes- tern provinces of the empire now occupied by the barbarians. Not to be surrounded with enemies on ail sides, he ended a long and un- decisive war against the Persians by a solemn treaty of peace, and then directed all his efforts to the conquest of Africa. The Vandals, who were still masters of that country, had very much degenerated from their former courage 3 and perpetual quarrels among the de- scendants of Genseric contributed to weaken more and more their political strength. One of these dissensions furnished Justinian with an opportunity to send a fleet and an army to Africa, under the com- mand of Belisarius (a. d. 533). This general had already, durmg the preceding Persian war, begun to display that extraordinary skill in the art of commanding armies, which afterwards rendered him equal to the greatest generals of an- cient Rome. He sailed from Constantinople with five hundred and ninety-two vessels of all dimensions, and, after a long voyage, landed on the shores of Africa, at some distance from Carthage. His troops amounted to scarcely sixteen thousand men; but they were full of ardor, and the general was himself a host. The Vandals, on the contrary, had numerous troops; but their generals were unskilled in war, and showed more valor than prudence: two of them perished in a first battle; the others, with King Gelimer, were put to flight, This enabled Belisarius to advance through the country without fur- ther obstacle. Every where he v/as received as a deliverer by the an cient inhabitants, especially by those of Carthage : the rigor and bar- barism of the Vandals had long since exasperated their minds ; where- as the mildness of Justinian's general, and the excellent discipline which he maintained in his army, gained him universal confidence and affection. From Carthage, Belisarius went forward in pursuit of Gelimer. Having found him stationed at Tricameron, a place twenty miles distant from Carthage ; with only ten thousand men against one hundred thousand Vandals, he obtained a glorious vic- tory, which rendered him master of the Avhole surrounding country, of the royal treasures, and even, in a short time of the person of the king (534). This prince had fled from the field of battle to the extremity of Numidia, and there had shut himself up in a town situated on the summit of a high mountain. Belisarius, whose presence was neces- sary at Carthage, sent one of his generals, named Pharas, with a part of the army, to invest that place, and if possible, to take the king prisoner. Accordingly, the town was closely besieged, and, before the expiration of three months, was reduced to the last ex- tremity; in the meanwhile, Pharas wrote to Gehraer, and exhorted A. D. 527 — 565.] JUSTINIAN-. 147 him to surrender, with a positive assurance that he would be hono- rably treated by Justinian. The unfortunate prince wept whilst reading the letter^ and in his answer to it, after expressing his unwil- lingness to become a captive, requested Pharas to send him a loaf, a sponge and a lute : a loaf, because he had not seen any bread for a long time ; a sponge, to wash his wounds ; and a lute, to accompany his voice when singing his misfortunes. Pharas, moved with compassion, granted the request, but still con- tinued, with diligent care, to obstruct all the avenues of the fortress. At length, Gelimer, afraid lest it should be taken by storm, consented to capitulate. He descended from the mountain, and, on the re- peated assurances of an honorable treatment, went with Pharas to Carthage, where he delivered himself into the hands of Behsarius. Thus was Africa again subjected to the Roman power,* and the kingdom of the Vandals destroyed after a duration of one hundred and six years. Belisarius, having provided, as well as he was able, for the security of his conquest, returned to Constantinople, where he received honors proportionate to the greatness of his exploits. He had taken the precaution to make Gelimer embark with him and leave Africa. When this unhappy monarch was solemnly presented to the emperor, in the middle of an immense concourse of people, no sigh, no tear escaped him ; but appearing to be plunged in deep reflection on the present state of his fortune, he several times repeated these words of Scripture: Vanity of vanities, and all is vanity. j' Jus- tinian gave him a rich estate in Galatia, where he was permitted to live in quiet whh his family. Scarcely had the African provinces been united to the empire, when similar views began to be manifested with respect to Italy. The unjust death inflicted by ungrateful subjects on dueen Amala- sontes, who had been a faithful ally to the court of Constantinople, was for the emperor a favorable pretext for attacking the Goths. In the year 535, the conqueror of Africa, Belisarius, unexpectedly ap- peared in Sicily, at the head of seven thousand five hundred men. With this handful of soldiers that great general knew how to achieve exploits, which others would have found difficult to accomplish with very numerous armies:^. After subduing the island, he passed over * The empire of Constantinople retained for many centuries the name of Roman or Eastern, though it is also frequently designated by the appellation of Greek or Lower Empire. t Eccles. i, 2. X This appeared particularly in the year 537, when Belisarius, after takinz Rome, was himself besieged in that city by an army of one hundred and fifty thousand men. The siege lasted twelve months and nine days, during wn'ch the two parties engaged seventy times, with a great display of valoi on each side- but Belisarius, with only the twentieth part of the enemy '-> 148 MODERN" HISTORY. [PART 3. to the continent, and either by storm or surprise, by force or capitula- tion, took Naples, Rome, Ravenna, with many other cities, defeated the Goths on several occasions, and finally compelled their king Vitiges to embark, as GeUraer had done, for Constantinople, where the Gothic monarch also received estates and honorable titles from Justinian, as a compensation for the loss of his kingdom (a. d. 540). Still tlie power of the Goths in Italy was not yet entirely over- thrown. Notwithstanding the fatal blow it had just received, it reco- vered for a time its former strength, and even acquired, after the de- parture of BeUsarius, an astonishing superiority, under the conduct of Totila, whom the Goths chose for their leader in 541. Of all the successors of Theodoric the Great, Totila was the only one who perfectly resembled him in prudence, activity, valor, justice and generosity. He conquered the Roman commanders in Italy, as often as he attacked them, and retook Rome in spite of all the exer- tions made by Belisarius after his return (a. d, 546). This great general, left by the emperor without the necessary supplies of ammu- nition and troops, saw his former prosperity decline; after some years of fruitless efforts, he resigned the command of the army, and left to Narses the honor of terminating the war. Narses was one of those extraordinary men whom Providence pre- pares, as it were, in secret, for the prosperity or the destruction of states. Though a stranger, of small size and mean appearance, he had risen from a slave, to be one of the first officers in the palace of Justinian. The deficiency of regular studies was abundantly supplied in him by a natural and noble eloquence. A quick and sound judgment, a profound and extensive genius, wisdom in con- triving the best plans and activity in executing them, insured the suc- cess of his undertakings. He possessed in an eminent degree all the virtues not incompatible with a certain ambition, above all, generosity and beneficence. As for his talents in war, they only wanted an occasion for their display, and without having been a soldier, he all at once appeared a consummate general. Besides these natural advantages, Narses enjoyed the favor of Jus- tinian, who readily granted him what had been refused to Belisarius, viz : all the troops, money and ammunition requisite to carry on the war with vigor and success. Being thus well provided in every re- spect, he had but to appear in Italy, to check the prosperous fortune of the Goths, and the very first battle which he fought, in the plains of Lentagio, entirely turned the scale in favor of the Romans. In vain did Totila make every effort to maintain the superiority which forces, defeated all their efforts, and finally obliged them to retire. — Pro- copius, De Bello Goih.; Lebeau, Hist, du Bas. empire, vol. ix. b. 44, jtp 395- -473. A. D. 527 — 565.] JUSTINIAN. 149 he had acquired ; his army was completely defeated, his bravest war- riors were killed, and he himself, being forced to fly for the first time in his life, died of his wounds a few hours after the batde. Narses immediately sent to Constantinople the news of his victory, together with the cuirass and the crown of Totila; and Justinian received, in the middle of the senate, these spoils taken from a prince far superior to him in personal merit (a. d. 552). The Goths, although vanquished, and deeply afflicted at the death of their excellent king, did not lose courage, but hastened to give him a worthy successor in the person of Teias, the bravest of his lieutenants. In this arduous post, Teias answered as well as he pos- sibly could the hopes of his nation, and, being unable to save it, strove at least to retard its entire overthrow. He rallied the remains of the Gothic army, and leaving the open country to the victorious troops of Narses, went to occupy a strong position near Mount Vesuvius. The Roman general, at the head of all his forces, pursued him so closely, that the Goths began to suffer considerably from famine. Then, con- sidering the decaying state of their fortune, which was on the point of being utterly lost, these magnanimous and last survivors of a na- tion formerly so flourishing, looked at their swords, and resolved to fight once more, either to conquer by a last effort, or at least to die with glory. No sooner had they come to this determination, than, descending from the heights, they rushed with desperate fury against the enemy : but the resistance was not less vigorous than the attack was violent. The Romans were encouraged by the remembrance of past success, and an implicit confidence in the superior talents of their general: the Goths were animated by despair and by the example of their king, who having taken his post in the first rank, displayed the most heroic courage, and, for the space of four hours, spread among the enemy terror and death. Assailed as he was by a multitude of javelins and arrows, Teias, immovable as a rock, with one hand warded off the weapons, and, with the other, slew as many Romans as came within his reach. At length, unable to bear up his shield, which was pierced with twelve javelins, he asked for another. Whilst he was taking it from the hands of his armor-bearer, and putting off the first, his breast for an instant remained uncovered ; at this very moment, he received a deadly blow; he however continued to fight until he became exhausted, and then fell with his face towards the enemy. The Romans cut off the head of this valiant prince, and exposed it, on the top of a pike, to the gaze of both armies, especially to that of the Goths, in order to throw them into consternation and despair. But the courage of those intrepid warriors, instead of being abated by this melancholy event, was rather increased by the desire of 13* 150 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 3. avenging the death of Teias. They therefore continued fighting with great heroism, until the darkness of night separated them from iae Romans. Both parties spent the night on the field of battle, and, aa soon as the dawn appeared, the combat was renewed with the same fury and maintained with the same obstinacy as the day before; nor could Narses put to flight enemies who were few in number, wounded and fatigued, but, at the same time, buoyed up by their excitement, and making their last desperate effort. Giving up the hope of conquering men to whom liberty was dearer than life, he per- mitted them to retire unmolested, on condition that they would never more unsheath their swords against the empire ; after this, he easily achieved the conquest of Italy (a. d. 553). The kingdom of the Ostro- goths thus disappeared for ever, after a short duration of sixty years, during which it had produced tliree heroes worthy of that name, Theo- doric, Totila and Teias. The authority of Justinian being now ac- knowledged throughout Italy, Narses, by his appointment and in his name, governed the country which he had so gloriously subjugated. Warfare however was not yet entirely at an end, owing to the share that the French took for a long time in these public broils. The successors of Clovis had inherited his warlike spirit, which they all exerted in subduing the little neighboring states : but none among them became as remarkable in this respect, as Theodebertus, king of Austrasia and of a considerable part of Germany. So great was his reputation for ability and valor, that both the Greeks and the Ostro- goths, from the very beginning of their contest, eagerly courted his alliance. He promised it to each nation, but was faithful to neither, his design being to conquer for himself. With this interested view, he crossed the Alps at the head of a powerful army, attacked both parties successively, defeated them, and would probably have re- mained sole master of the disputed regions, had not a contagious distemper, which broke out among his soldiers, obliged him to re- tire with considerable loss (a. d. 539). After his retreat, though none of those who followed hirn had pe- rished by the sword of the Romans, Justinian had the ridiculous vanity to assume the title of Franciciis, or conqueror of the French, Theodebertus, filled with indignation, resolved to avenge the insult, and by following the course of the Danube, to invade Thrace, and then attack the very capital of the Greek empire. Already great pre- parations were making for this purpose, and the emperor began to tremble in Constantinople, when Theodebertus d)ed in the flower of his age (a. d. 548), and there was none after him skilful or bold enough to execute his projects. It was only towards the end of tne Gothic war, that two of his successor's generals, Leulharis and Bucelin, undertook in their own A. D. 627—565.] JUSTINIAN. 151 name the defence of the Goths, who were now deprived of every other resource. They passed across the Alps into Italy, with seventy- five thousand warriors, French and Germans. This army, like a fu- rious torrent, overran the whole peninsula, from the northern pro- vinces to the southern extremity of Calabria, sweeping away or de stroying every thing in its impetuous course. Leutharis then desired to secure his booty by returning to the north, but was entirely foiled in his design. Being first defeated by the Romans during his march, he had scarcely reached and recrossed the river Po, when a dreadful pestilence carried him off, with nearly all his soldiers; a just punishment for the depredations and cruelties which they had com- mitted. In the meanwhile, the army of Bucelin was also in a very per- plexed condition : Narses, unable, in the opening of the campaign, to stop his progress, succeeded at last in famishing his wearied troops ; this induced the German chieftain to engage in a general batde, rather than let all his followers die of sickness and starvation. The two armies met near Capua, on the banks of the little river Casilino, from which the bloody fight took its name. Never was there witnessed greater impetuosity on the one side, nor more valiant resistance on the other; nor was there ever a more striking proof the superiority of true courage regulated by discipline, over blind and unrestrained bravery. Although the Romans and their auxiliaries found them- selves at first in great danger, from the violence of the enemy's at- tack, the defeat of the French and Germans was so complete, that, out of thirty thousand, only five men escaped, all the others being slain with their general ; whereas the conquerors, whose number scarcely amounted to eighteen thousand, did not lose more than eighty men. All of them had performed prodigies of valor; but the honor of the day was by every one attributed to Narses, whose pre- sence of mind and superior genius had changed into so glorious a triumph, a combat the beginning of which seemed almost desperate for the Romans (a. d. 554). Shortly after, he cut to pieces another party of French, who were occupying a large portion of the country between the Po and the mountains: so many losses made them aban- don the hope of obtaining a footing in Italy. Whilst the bravest troops and the ablest generals of the empire were thus employed in the West, the Persians had recommenced the war in the East. During many years, their king Chosroes I, sur- named the Great, spread devastation through the rich provinces of Mesopotamia and Syria, burning or sacking the towns, plundermg the country, and routing the armies sent for its defence. He several times returned, after his campaigns to Persia with an immense booty, or after having forced Justinian to pay him a heavy tribute. Belisa- 152 MODEEN HISTORY. [PART 3. rius repaired in some degree the dishonor of the Roman armsj but after his departure, when he went to Italy for the second time, it daily increased under other generals; particularly when thirty thousand Ro- mans Avere defeated by four thousand Persians, and, on another oc- casion, fifty thousand by three thousand only.* At length, a signal vic- tory and other advantages gained by the troops of Justinian, permitted him to conclude a truce less disgraceful to the empire (a. d. 555). This truce was the more opportune as the state was visited at this period with many other calamities. Earthquakes overthrew several buildings, and pestilence destroyed many of the inhabitants of Con- stantinople; on the other hand, the Huns made a furious irruption into Thrace, and advanced so far as to threaten the capital. Belisa- rius was once more, on this occasion, the glorious defender and the strongest bulwark of the empire. Though scarcely able, on account of old age, to wield a sword, he marched out with a handful of war riors against the barbarians, and obliged them to retire (559). In return for so many services, the suspicious emperor, deceived by the slanders of the court, and believing Belisarius privy to a late conspiracy, stripped this great man of all his honors, and condemned him to an ignominious confinement which lasted seven months. It is even said and believed by many that his eyes were put out, and that he was reduced to so great a misery, as to beg his bread in the streets of Constantinople. But this seems to be a mere tale, quite unknown to contemporary historians, and founded on no better au- thority than that of John Tzetzes, an injudicious Greek writer of tho twelfth century. More ancient authors, as Cedrenus and Theophanes, instead of mentioning any such fact, relate that Belisarms recovered his dignities and the friendship of the emperor. Both of them died shortly after, and in the same year (565). Jus- tinian was in the eighty-fourth year of his life, and the thirty-ninth of a reign which had been more famous abroad than prosperous at home, especially towards its close. The armies now stood in a miserable condition for want of regular pay, and the provinces were groaning under the pressure of heavy taxes, which served only to enrich covetous courtiers, or were spent in purchasing peace from the barbarians. Moreover, the emperor's munificence often degenerated into prodigality ; this being added to an inordinate pas- sion for new buildings, one of the incorrigible defects of Justinian, caused immense sums to be expended, that might have been much better employed. It should also be remarked that, after having amended the Roman legislation, he frequently altered his own laws, or suffered them to * Lebeau, Hist, du Bas. empire, vol. x, pp. 225-228 ; and vol. xr, 1S-22L Agath. and Procop. De Bello Persico. A. D. 565 — 582.] JUSTIN ii. — tiberius ii. 153 be changed by his courtiers and ministers, in accordance with their interests and passions. The same inconstancy, and a weak conde- scension for his haughty and wicked Avife Theodora, often betrayed him into wrong and unjust measures, so far as to disgrace his ardent zeal for rehgion by the violence of his measures, and by his conti- nual attempts to rule and direct the affairs of the Church, whilst he neglected those of the empire. Owing to his imprudence, the fac- tions of the circus excited many disturbances, sometimes even bloody seditions in Constantinople, the emperor's blind partiality for one of the parties having increased their mutual animosity, which continued under his successors, and proved one of the greatest calamities of that capital. In a word, although Justinian possessed great talents and many virtues, one might reasonably think, from the general tenor of his government, that he was rather an idle spectator of the splendid transactions w^hich occurred during his reign, and that he really did less good than evil to both Church and State. However, it would be unjust to deny that this emperor had many noble views, and formed truly glorious designs. The reformation of jurisprudence, the conquest of Italy and Africa, his endeavors to in- crease the power and splendor of the empire, were certainly under- takings calculated to confer undying honor on any reign. If he did not himself carry them into execution, his at least was the glory of having contrived the plans, furnished the means, and effected their accomplishment through the instrumentality of talented individuals whose services Divine Providence placed at his disposal. JUSTIN II.— TIBERIUS II.— a. d. 565—582. At the death of Justinian, who left no issue, the imperial sceptre passed into the hands of his nephew, Justin II. This prince com- menced his reign with universal applause, having, on the very first day, redressed many grievances, and paid innumerable debts con- tracted by Justinian in his old age. His subsequent conduct was not. It is true, always marked by the same love of law and justice j still, the emperor displayed it on many other occasions, particularly in the Ibllowing occurrence, which is well deserving of notice. In order to check fraud and extortion in the capital, Justin ap- pointed for its prefect a magistrate of renowned integrity, who was not less firm in the discharge of his duty, than upright and virtuous. He invested him with unUmited power to punish, without appeal and without hope -of pardon, all criminals, of whatever rank or con- dition; a just, though severe statute, which frightened all iniquitous 154 MODEKN HISTORY. [PART 3. men and extorti )ners, one only excepted, a proud nobleman, who thought himself above the reach of either divine or human law. A complaint was lodged against this man by a poor widow whom he liad robbed of all her property. The prefect, through regard for the accused, who was a relation to the emperor, wrote to him, and intrust- ing the letter to no one but the injured widow, begged him to indem nify her for the wrong she had suffered. The only satisfaction she received, was insult and ill treatment. The prefect, hearing this, was inflamed with indignation, and summoned the offender before his tribunal ; but his new orders wero equally despised, and answered only with fresh insults and railleries against both the judge and the judgment. Instead of appearing, the haughty nobleman went to the palace, where he was invited to dine with a great number of courtiers. No sooner did the prefect know that he was at table with the emperor, than he himself entered the dining-room, and said to Justin: "My lord, if you persist in the resolution which you have manifested of punishing oppression and violence, I also shall continue to fulfil your orders. But if you re- nounce a design so worthy of you, if the worst of men are honored with your favor and admitted to your table, receive my resignation of an office which becomes useless to your subjects, and cannot but be displeasing to yourself." To this noble remonstrance Justin an- swered that he had not changed his mind. " Punish," said he to the prefect, *^ punish injustice every where; were it even seated with me upon the throne, I would rather descend, to deliver it up to pun- ishment." The vntuous magistrate did not desire more : emboldened by this answer, he presently ordered the culprit to be seized in tha midst of the guests, and carried before his tribunal. The widow*3 complaints were heard, and as that man, before so arrogant, and now speechless and trembling, could not urge any thing in his defence the prefect caused him to be stripped and beaten with rods, and then to ride upon an ass, with his face turned to the tail, through all the streets of the city -, his effects were moreover forfeited for the oenefit of the widow. This exemplary chastisement stopped foi some time the course of usurpation and extortion. The emperoi rewarded the resolute conduct of the prefect by raising him to th.e rank of a patrician, and confirming him in his charge for the remain- der of his life.* The other quahfications of Justin were not equal to his zeal foi the enforcement of the laws and of good order. He; was dissolute, * This act of firmness and vigor is by some referred to the reign of Justi'" I, but mjre probably belong^ to that of Justin II, and to the year 574 oi near that time. — See Lebeau, Histoire du Bas empire^ vol. xi, pp. 235-237 — Petavius, Rationarium tcmpofum, vol. i,p. 409. A.-D. 565—282.] JUSTIN II. — tiberius ii. 155 indolent, pusillanimous, and, at the same tinje, haughty lo excess towards the ambassadors of foreign nations. This unbecoming pride, which his wife Sophia too faithfully imitated, occasioned bloody wars, and caused great losses to the empire. That princess, having long since harbored a deep hatred against Narses, the conqueror, and at that time, the governor of Italy, sent him a spindle and a dis- taff, with a scornful letter, telling him that those articles were more suitable for him than the command of armies and the government of provinces; for which reason she ordered him to depart from Italy, and return to Constantinople, to be employed in the palace. Narses had virtue, firmness and courage, but not to such a degree as patiently to bear so cruel an affront. On the perusal of the letter, his eyes sparkled with wrath, and, in a sarcastic tone : ** Go," said he to the messenger, " and tell the empress, that I will cut out for her more work than she desires." He immediately wrote to the na- tion of the Lombards (so called from their long beards), inviting them to come and invade Italy. He soon repented of his treason, and died with the bitter regret of having by that one act, dishonored a life of ninety-five years, the last portion of which had been ennobled by so many glorious achievements.* But this repentance came too late to prevent the evil consequences of his rash step : the Lombards had already set out under the guidance of their King Alboin (568) They crossed the Alps from the north-east, and meeting with little opposition, subdued all that part of the peninsula which received from them the name of Lombardy. Pavia was the capital of this ne\^ kingdom. The invaders did not advance far enough, or in sufficiem numbers, to take the other chief cities, Rome, Naples, Ravenna, etc.; these therefore continued, for nearly two centuries more, under the power of the emperors of Constantinople, Ravenna being chosen, on account of its advantageous situation, to be the residence of the governors whom they appointed under the title of exarchs. The imprudence of Justin gave rise also to a new war against the Persians, the beginning of which did great injury to the Romans. Whilst the emperor, more ready to threaten than to execute, remained shut up in his palace, Chosroes, ever active and intrepid, unexpect- edly appeared on the frontiers at the head of one hundred and forty thousand men, attacked Mesopotamia and Syria, and with little or no opposition, desolated those rich provinces. The intelligence of these * In this we follow the account commonly given by historians ; still it should be observed, in justification of Narses, that several learned critics deny his having yielded to his resentment and made any proposal to the Lombards about the invasion of Italy ; which invasion, they say, waa undertaken for a variety of other causes. — Ste Annales du moyen age, vol. Ill, 2^. 18S. — Lebeau, vol. xi,pp, 178, 179. 156 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 3. disasters threw juslin into such a melancholy as degenerated into real madness, the paroxysms of which became more and more fre- quent. Having fortunately retained his senses sufficiendy to feel that he was no longer able to govern without a colleague, he made choice of Tiberius, the commander of his guards, a man universally respected for his prudence and virtue, and intrusted to him the reins of government (a. d. 574). It would have been difficult to make abetter choice j and Chosroea soon perceived, to his cost, that the imperial court was now directed by a more vigorous hand. He saw the career of his triumphs and prosperity checked at the battle of MeHtine, a town of Lesser Armenia, where he found himself opposed by one hundred and fifty thousand men, Romans and auxiUaries, whom Tiberius had mustered from the difierent parts of the empire as Avell as from the surroundmg nations. Notwithstanding the exertions of Chosroes during the contest, most of the Persians were put to the sword, or driven into the Euplirates, where they perished. The dejected monarch fled with all haste to the extremities of Persia, and died in grief and despair, after a memo- rable reign of forty-eight years. Whilst Tiberius was thus restoring the honor of the Roman armies, he was not less careful to restore the interior tranquiUity of the state. Crimes and extortions were checked by severe laws. The vain magnificence and useless expenses of the imperial court were abolished, and by this wise measure Tiberius enabled himself to support the standing army, diminish the taxes, relieve the wants of divers provinces, and gain the hearts of his subjects, by conferring on them benefits worthy of a great prince. He considered them all as his children, the state as his family, and the sovereign power as a blessing which he must render, as much as possible, common to all, by his equity, kindness and liberality. Amidst these laudable employments, the death of Jusdn, in 578, left him sole master. As the empress Sophia, by her counsels and mfluence, had been instrumental in placing him on the throne, she expected that, as she was now a widow, he would marry her, and thus enable her to preserve the title of empress. But Tiberius was already married, a fact of which she was not aware. On the day of his coronation, he made his virtuous wife, Anastasia, suddenly appear in the sight of the people, and crowned her with his own hands, to the extreme joy of all the spectators except Sophia, whose disap- pointment can scarcely be imagined. This ambitious princess, in the violence of her resentment, did all in her power to dethrone a sove- reign to whose elevation she had so much contributed. Tiberius contented himself with depriving- her of the great riches which had A. D. 582—602.] MAUKITIUS. 157 been left at her disposal, and in spite of her intrigues, remained in quiet possession of the throne. He occupied it only four years, and during this short interval, con- stantly displayed virtues equal to his rank. To procure the welfars of his people and maintain the honor of the empire, were now, as they had hitherto been, the constant objects of his soHcitude. If, for want of sufficient forces, he could not expel the Lombards from their conquests in Italy, nor prevent the Avari, a Scythian nation, from obtaining a similar settlement in Pannonia ; he at least continued, though desirous of peace, to gain great advantages against the Per- sians, whose new king Hormisdas was obstinately bent on prosecu- ting the Avar. For these successes, the emperor was chiefly indebted to Mauritius, commander of his armies in the East. Mauritius was a man of great valor and experience, and, with the exception of a certain taint of avarice, still more commendable for the qualities of his heart. Tiberius, whose health was rapidly declining, thought he could do nothing better for the state than to appoint him his successor. This he did in a solemn assembly with universal applause, and died the next day (14th of August, 582), leaving Constantinople in deep affliction for the loss of so excellent an emperor, and yet in the cheer- ing hope of equal prosperity under the new sovereign. MAURITIUS,— A. r. 5S2— 602 The triumphs of Mauritius over the Persians had raised him to the throne: in ordc* to maintain his own work, and pursue the course of his victories, he sent numerous armies to the frontiers ; but the misunderstanding of the troops and generals permitted the enemy to regain the superiority in the first campaigns. At length, good order was re-established, and the Persians were conquered in many battles. These defeats, joined to the intolerable pride and cruelty of Hormis- das, roused his subjects against him. He was thrown into a dun- g;eon, and shortly after, put to death, with the consent of his son (Jhosroes II, who began to reign in his place. But Chosroes himself was not secure upon a throne lately stained with his father's blood. A considerable portion of the army perse- vered in its rebellion against the royal family, and defeated the troops of the king. In this distress, Chosroes, trusting more to a generoua enemy than to disloyal subjects, fled for refuge to the Roman boun- daries, from which he wrote a moving letter to Mauritius, requesting hi3 assistance and protection. Mauritius liberally complied with the 14 158 MODEEN HISTORY. , [PART 3. request : by his orders, the fugitive monarch was treated iu a mannet worthy of a sovereign, and moreover suppHed with a powerful army, whose exertions enabled him to re-enter his own dominions in tri- umph, to crush the rebels, and regain the undisturbed possession of his kingdom (a. d. 593). In return for these signal benefits, Chosroes yielded to the Romana the territories and cities for which so much blood had been shed and so many battles fought within the last years. A permanent peace was concluded between Persia and the empire ; and thus, instead of meanly fomenting the internal feuds of a powerful and rival state, Mauritius had the honor of bringing them to a happy termination, of replacing an exiled sovereign upon his throne, and of ending, by an act of generosity far more commendable than all his victories, a long and violent struggle which had proved so fatal to both nations. The emperor then directed his attention chiefly to the defence of the northern frontier against the attacks of the Avari. These barba- rians were accustomed to a life of warfare and pillage : frequently victorious and successful in their attempts, sometimes conquered and repulsed, they incessantly renewed their inroads, and spread devas- tation through Mesia, Thrace and other provinces. At last, a mas- terly expedition of Priscus, one of the Roman generals, in 601, almost annihilated their forces, without however destroying their warlike and restless spirit. This brave commander, having resolved to strike a signal blow, crossed the Danube with the intention of attacking the Avari upon their own territories, and immediately sent away the boats, in order to reduce his own soldiers to the necessity of conquering or perishing. This bemg done, he marched out of his camp, with all his troops drawn up in battle array ; and, as it was the custom of the barbarians to fight in separate bodies and in a desultory manner, Priscus divided his army into three square battalions, the better to face the enemy on all sides. He ordered them, moreover, not to use their arrows, but to come to close fight with their pikes and javehns. This first com- bat ended only with the day, and the issue was favorable to the Ro- mans; for, whilst their loss did not amount to more than three hun- dred men, they had killed four thousand of the Avari. The enemy did not appear for two days. On the morning of the third, Priscus drew up his army in the same order as before, but, during the contest, gradually extended its wings, so as to enclose the barbarians, who lost nine thousand men on that day. The ten fol- lowing days passed without any new engagement. Priscus, ani- mated by his first success, and seemg the Avari at a stand, went forward to provoke them a third time to battle. He posted his troops on the declivity of a hill, at the bottom of which there was a lalce. A. D. 582— 602.] MAURITIUS. 159 The Romans rushed upon the barbarians with such fury, and drove them fo wards the lake with such irrresistible force, that fifteen thou- sand of them were put to the sword, or perished in the water. Of this number were the four sons of the Kan (chief of the Avari); and the Kan himself was, for some moments, in great danger, which he escaped only by a precipitate flight. Priscus, having let his troops take some repose, went in search of the Avari, and fought them in a fourth and equally successful battle, which obliged the vanquished to retreat beyond the river Teissa. The conqueror sent four thousand men to observe them, and txamine their new position. This detachment found in a certain borough a great multitude of Gepidae, subjects of the Avarian nation, who had just come to celebrate one of their solemn feasts. These barbarians, not being informed of the issue of the last battle, were enjoying themselves at table during the night, particularly in drinking: the Romans arrived just at that time, and easily slew thirty thousand of them J they then returned, loaded with booty, to their camp on the other side of the river. Twenty days more having elapsed, tne Kan, at the head of a con- siderable force, recrossed the Teissa, and challenged the Romans to a fifth battle. His obstinate resolution was still of no avail, and this victory of Priscus crowned the success of his glorious campaign, which had not lasted more than two months. The numerous army of the Avari was either cut to pieces or drowned in the river. There remained only about seventeen thousand men, many of whom were taken prisoners; but, shortly after, the Kan had the good fortune to recover them by a stratagem, and with them repaired, in some mea- sure, the great losses of his nation. It was just the reverse with the Greek emperor, whose political career, so successful in the beginning, ended in a bloody tragedy of which he and all his family were the victims. During one of the preceding campaigns, the Avari had taken twelve thousand Roman prisoners, whom Mauritius refused to redeem, though but a trifling sum was asked for their ransom ; and this refusal so enraged the barbarians, that they put them all to the sword. The emperor then began to be stung with remorse, gave large alms, and prayed tha/ God would rather punish him in this Hfe, than in the next. His prayer was heard, and he himself unknowingly prepared the way for its accomplishment. The late conduct of this prince with regard to the prisoners, had already provoked loud complaints against him, when, in the year 602, he ordered the troops on the frontier to take up their quarters in the enemy's country, and to subsist there by plunder during winter. The soldiers exasperated at this command, chose one Pho- 160 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 3. cas, a daring, ambitious man, for their leader, and marched to Con' stantinople, where he was crowned emperor. Mauritius endeavored to make his escape, and passed indeed to the opposite shore; but he was overtaken with his family. His five sons were slain before his eyes at Chalcedon, whilst he repeated these words of the Royal Prophet; J'hou arljust, OLord, and thy judgment is light f and when the nurse offered her own child instead of his youngest, he would not suffer it. Last of all, he himself was massacred, and, after having shown him- self a great general and an emperor of some ability, he appeared in his last moments a true and magnanimous hero. He had held the sceptre twenty, and lived sixty-three years. During his reign, an inundation took place in Italy, which was deemed the most surprising and destructive that had ever happened since the deluge. All the rivers overflowed, and spread devastation throughout the whole country. The plains were covered with such a quantity of water, as to present the spectacle of a vast sea, upon whose surface the wrecks of farms, the timber of houses, the dead bodies of men and animals, v/ere floating on every side, as in a gene- ral shipwreck. The Tiber was so high, that it filled the streets of Rome, destroyed many buildings, and left uncovered only the seven famous hills of the city, which then appeared as so many islands. The rapid stream carried along with it an incredible multitude of ser- pents, among which there was seen one of an enormous size. Being all hurried away into the sea, they perished, and were thrown up by the waves upon the beach. In fine, this deluge was accompanied by frightful storms, thunder and lightnings, and followed by a pesti- lence, which swept off vast numbers of inhabitants. In the midst of these calamities, St. Gregory the Great was, not- withstanding his modest reluctance, raised to the chair of St. Peter, which he occupied fourteen years (590 — 604). During that period he constantly acted the part of a wise, enlightened, virtuous and holy pontiff, as all contemporary monuments testify .f This great pope *Ps. cxviii. 137. f This being an incontestable fact to -vvliich all sorts of documents bear ample testimony, plainly demonstrates how unjust and absurd are the charges of bigoted zeal, ambition, flattery towards princes, etc., brought forward by Hume and other infidels against St. Gregor3^ Equally unfounded and ridiculous is the accusation of his having destroy ed the books and other monuments of ancient literature in Rome. Thia wprk of destruction is not only well accounted for by the multiplied ravages of the barbarians, but, even in the opinion of Bayle and Barbeyrac, two au- thors little suspected of partiality in favor of the'popes, not one single good E roof can be adduced that St. Gregory ever attempted to do so; except per- aps with regard to books of sorcery and judicious astrology, which St. Paul himself judged worthy of entire destruction, as we read m the Acts of the Apostles xix, 19. All this has been candidly acknowledged by Roscoe, in A. D. 602—610.] pnocAS. 161 arrested the progress of the plague by his prayers ; instructed empe^ rors, and at the same time inculcated the obligation of true obedience in their regard : consoled and strengthened Africa; confirmed in tlie true faith the Visigoths of Spain, lately converted from Arianisra with their king Recared ; sent to England the glad tidings of the gos- pel; reformed disciphne in France; subdued the fierce temper of the Lombards; saved Rome and Italy, which the emperors were unable to assist ; checked the growing pride of the patriarchs of Constanti- nople; enlightened the whole Church by his doctrine; governed the East and West with equal vigor and humility, and afforded to tlie world a perfect model of ecclesiastical government. PHOCAS,— A. D. 602—610. Mauritius and his guiltless offspring being inhumanly cut off Phocas, the leader of the rebellion, the personification of intemper- ance and cruelty, appeared in secure possesion of the supreme power in Constantinople. But Chosroes, the politic king of Persia, with sentiments of seeming indignation at the murder of his kind bene- factor and ally, loudly exclaimed against the assassin on the throne, and threatened revenge. A still stronger motive, his own interest, induced him to declare war against the tyrant Phocas. With nu- merous troops, he passed the Roman boundary, and, meeting with no resistance, quickly overran Mesopotamia and Syria. Phocas, who had renounced the profession of a soldier, without assuming the character of a prince, remained -inactive, and beheld with indifference the ravages of his dominions. He suffered Chosroes to gratify his revenge and ambition without a check, and exclusively employed himself in shedding the blood of the worthiest men of the state, and gratifying his unruly passions. His own relatives and the senate of Constantinople, seeing nothing done for the preservation of the empire, secretly requested Heraclius, the governor of Africa, to come to their assistance, assuring him that the purple would be the reward of his services. Age had (Extinguished the last spark of ambition in the breast of Heraclius; but he took all proper means to secure the crown for hia son. The young Heraclius boldly embarked in the hazardous en- terprise, put a select body of troops on board the vessels that were his History of Leo the Tenth, vol. i, ch. r, p. 53, where he praises " the benefi- cence, candor and pastoral attention of GrcE^ory 1, — unjustly charged," h« Rdds, " with being the adversary of liberal studies." 162 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 3. ready for sea, set sail, and nearly reached Constantinople, before Phocas had the least suspicion of his rival's approach. After a sharp contest at sea, Heraclius forced the entrance of tne harbor. In the meantime, the tyrant destitute of friends, was seized by a private enemy, and conveyed on board the galley of the conqueror, who first reproached him for his atrocious crimes, then ordered his head to be struck off and his body to be burned. HeracHus was immediately proclaimed emperor (a. d. 610). HERACLIUS.— A. D. 610—628. By this time,, the empire was in a most deplorable condition. On one hand, the pubhc treasury was drained; there were hardly any troops to defend the frontiers, and not one good general at their head, the ablest officers having either fallen in battle or perished by the sword of the tyrant. On the other hand, the Avari were recommenc- ing their inroads in the West, and the Persians continuing the work ot depredation throughout the whole East. The latter, in four success- ful campaigns (611 — 615), subdued Mesopotamia, Cappadocia, Sy- ria and Palestine; plundered the cities of Edessa, Caesarea, Antioch, Damascus, Jerusalem, etc., and carrying off innumerable captives, together with an immense booty, left those unfortunate regions co- vered with blood, ruins and ashes. In pursuit of new victories, the Persians then marched into Egypt, took the wealthy city of Alexandria, and desolated the whole coun- try around; while another army advanced through Pontus and Asia Minor as far as the Straits of Constantinople. Unprepared, and un- able to resist so powerful a force, Heraclius begged peace of Chos- roes with suppHant intreaties, and even oh the humiliating terms of purchasing it by an annual tribute. The haughty monarch rejected the proposal with scorn. Putting the ambassadors in chains, he swore that he would spare neither the emperor nor his subjects, un- less they would abjure their crucified God, and, like the Persians, adopt the worship of the sun. In this desperate state of affairs, HeracHus thought of abandoning Constantinople and transferring to Carthage the seat of the empire. Rising however from that despondency and lethargy in which he seemed to be plunged, he took at length the generous determination of putting himself at the head of his shattered troops, and to run with them all the hazards of so perilous a war. Being once roused to action, nothing appeared in him but heroism. He spent one year in prepanng his soldiers, and inspirmg them with his own ardor and A. D. 610 — 628.] HEEACLIUS. 163 intrepidity; his design being, from the very first step, to remove the seat of war into Persia, and thereby oblige the infidels to return home for the defence of their country. Not to leave any enemies behind, he concluded a truce with the Avari, who had lately attacked him on tile side of Thrace; and in the year 622, the twelfth of his reign, began his march towards Persia, immediately after Easter. Before the expiration of the same year, Heraclius began to reap the fruit of his efforts, by defeating the Persians in Armenia. This first success turned for ever the scale of fortune : the Romans, so much dispirited before, but now under the conduct of a magnanimous prince, and animated by the example of his heroic valor, fearlessly entered the hostile territory, overthrowing, as they advanced, what- ever dared oppose their progress. Chosroes beheld, with impotent rage, all his armies conquered, his dominions laid waste, his cities and castles taken by storm, and himself compelled to fly for safety to more distant quarters. In the summer of 623, Herachus took the important city of Gansac or Tauris, and consigned a great part of it to the flames, especially a famous temple dedicated to heathen wor- ship, and the palace of Chosroes, in which there was a rich statue of this proud monarch, under a dome which represented the heavens with the sun, moon and stars, and round about it angels holding sceptres in their hands in honor of Chosroes, with machinery in- tended to produce effects resembling storms and thunder. Leading back his army to take winter quarters in Albania, near the Caspian sea, the emperor was moved with compassion towards fifty thousand Persian captives whom he had brought with him, and dismissed them all, after having supplied them with the necessaries of life. This act of humanity so touched their hearts, as to make them pray with tears for his further success, and express their ardent desire that he might deliver Persia from a tyrant who, by his exactions and cruelty, vms the destroyer of mankind. The campaigns of Heraclius in 624 and 625, were equally sut- cessful. He fought the numerous troops of the Persians in five or eix battles, and was as many times victorious. In 626, Sarbar, one of the Persian generals, arrived with a powerful army before Chalce- don on the Asiatic bank of the Bosphorus, and was seconded by the perfidious Avari, who, having broken the truce, attacked Constanti- nople on the European side; but they were repulsed both by land and sea, and Sarbar was hkewise foiled in his attempts against Chal- cedon. « On the 12th of December, 627, Heraclius, almost without any loss on his side, gave the Persians an entire overthrow near the ruins of the ancient city of Ninivis. Razates, their general, was found among the slain, with his shield and cuirass of solid gold ; and wuh him fell 164 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 3. nearly all the officers and the greater part of the Persian army. The haughty Chosroes was now driven from town to town, and yet con- tinued obstinately deaf to all proposals of peace. This obstinacy so exasperated his subjects against him, that even his nobles and gene- rals revolted, with Siroes, his eldest son ; and, as the old king had just declared Medarses, another of his sons, his successor, Siroes seized on his father, bound him in chains, and threw him into a dun- geon. There he was loaded with insults, allowed only a small quantity of bread and water for his sustenance, frequently shot at, and wounded with arrows, until he expired, on the fifth day of his confinement (a. ©. 628). Thus, through a just judgment of God, Chosroes II perished by the hands of an unnatural son, after having himself obtained the throne by spilling the blood of his father Hormisdas, and filled not only his own kingdom, but all the East, with carnage and desolation, during a reign of thirty-five years. Siroes immediately entered upon a treaty of peace with Heraclius, restored the provinces which the empire had lost, and released all the Roman prisoners. Another effect of this treaty was the restitution of the Holy Cross, which had been carried away by the Persians fourteen years before, and which, being now recovered from their hands, was conveyed back with great solemnity to Jerusalem. The emperor then returned in trmmph to Constantinople, and made his entry into that capital in a chariot drawn by four elephants, amidst the shouts of multitudes. He afterwards applied himself to repair in the several provinces, the evils caused by so disastrous a war; Persia, in the meantime, remaining a prey to an almost uninter- rupted succession of bloody revolutions, which followed the hasty death of Siroes. Upon the w^hole, both nations were exceedingly weakened, and shordy after found themselves unable to resist with success a common and most formidable enemy, who, issuing forth from the deserts of Arabia, was preparing at this very time to impose upon the whole East his yoke, his laws, and his new religion. RISE OF MAHOMETANISM.— A. d. 622—632. The author of this amazing revolution was Mahomet, or Moha- med, a descendant through Ismael, of the great Patriarch Abraham. This famous impostor is believed to have been born in the year 570, at Mecca, a town of Arabia. The first part of his life he spent in obscure employments, already cherishing however that unbounded ambition which was to burst with so much violence and to produce A. D. 622 — 632.] EISE OF MAHOMETANISM. 165 such extensive effects. At the age of forty, he assumed the quality of a prophet ; and supposing, contrary to the divine promises, thai the true worship of God existed no longer upon earth, boldly main- tained that he was commissioned by heaven to restore the religion of Abraham, Moses and Jesus Christ, to its primitive purity, dread- fully disfigured, he said, by Christians, Jews and Idolaters. Upon this foundation, Mahomet built his religious system, which is a monstrous compound of Judaism, Christianity, old heresies, and his own fancies ; on one side, discarding all the mysteries of religion, on the other, continually inculcating that " God is God, and Maho- met IS his prophet.'^ Being subject to fits of epilepsy, he attributed them to the visits of the Archangel Gabriel, by whom he pretended he was taught, but whose presence he could not bear without trances and convulsions. As he knew neither- how to read or write, it was only with the assistance of a Jewish Rabbin and of a Nestorian monk, that he compiled his Koran, or book of books, as he called it, and which, in reality, is nothing else than a most strange medley of some beautiful sentences and maxims taken from Holy Writ, and of non- sense, absurdities and ideas the most extravagant, without design or connexion, though expressed in a lofty and an animated style. It was a very favorable circumstance for the design of Mahomet, that he preached his doctrine first among Arabs and Saracens, the most ignorant people perhaps then in the world. Still, instead of making much progress in the beginning, it rather met with powerful opposition at Mecca ; so far, that the pretended prophet, seeing the danger which threatened his hfe, was obliged to depart from that town. Tliis event happened in the year 622, and is famous among the Ma- hometans, who trace back to it the beginning of their era, under the name of hegira, ov flight. Mahomet retired to Medina or Yatreb, another Arabian city, where he was received with great honors. He obtained there numerous proselytes, to whom he declared that he intended to estabUsh his reli- gion, not by the power of miracles, as the ancient prophets had done, but by the force and terror of arms.* To this first means of enforcing conviction, he added another ec^ually successful with the generaUty of men, the enticement of sensual pleasures; he himself setting the example of debauchery, as well as of ambition, enthusiasm and des perate courage. Having assembled a httle army, chiefly consisting of thieves and fugitive slaves, he at first attacked the caravans that went through Arabia for the purpose of trade, and meeting with great success, he enriched his soldiers and enlarged his projects. He took the city of Mecca from which he had been compelled to flee • See Note E. 166 MODEKN HISTORY. [PART 3. and thence carried the sword of destruction from cue tribe to another^ forcing all to embrace his religion, or pay him an annual tribute. Before his death (632), nearly the whole of Arabia was already sub- jugated. Such was the first result of the exertions of Mahomet; and, smco he had personally set the example to an enthusiastic people, it is chiefly to him, as to its first cause, that we should refer the long course of victories gained, and of conquests made by his successors. It was he who changed some miserable tribes, until then confined to the deserts of Arabia, into armies of undaunted warriors, for whom the invasion of the whole world seemed to be too little. Of what efforts were not those men capable, whose minds he had impressed with the dogma of absolute predestination, whose souls he had in- flamed with all the ardor of religious fanaticism, and whom, in fine, he had taught to look upon themselves as strictly bound and most happy either to conquer or to die on the field of battle for the propaga- tion of their sect! The inexorable severity of Mahomet towards the vanquished, was another cause of the rapidity of his success, the terror which he spread abroad, frequently disarming those whom he threatened with war. His practice in declaring it was, to propose the choice of one of three conditions, viz., the adoption of his religious system, or the payment of a tribute, or an appeal to the sword. They who agreed to the first, not only preserved their lives and property, but were even made partakers of all the privileges of Mussulmans. Those who consented to pay a tribute, were allowed to profess their own reli- gion, provided it was not gross idolatry. If they had courage to fight, no quarter was granted to them; only the women, old people and children were spared, and reduced to slavery. This terrible mode of proceeding continued for many years, and was abandoned only when the Mahometan power, being solidly established, had nothing to fear from its enemies. The followers of Mahomet are called Mahometans, from his own name; — Mussulmans or Moslems, from the word Islam, which means submission to God and to his prophet, and by which they desig- nate their religion; — sometimes Arabs, from their parent country;— and more frequently Saracens, from one of the principal tribes that first embraced Mahometanism. As to the chiefs of this new religion and empire, they took the name of CalipJis, or vicars of the prophet ELnd scimetimes also, the title of Emir at moumeimi or Mirarnolm which signifies prince, or commander of the faithful A. D. 632 — 639.] SARACENS IN SYRIA, ETC. 167 PROGRESS OF MAHOMET ANISM CONQUESTS OF THE SARACENS IN SYRIA, PALESTINE AND MESOrOTAMIA. A. D. 632—639. Mahomet having left no male issue, it was natural to expect that the titles and power he had enjoyed, should be transferred to Ali, his cousin, son-in-law, and designated heir. Still the suffrages of the nation were for Abu-Beker, Mahomet's father-in-law, a man of great repute among the Arabs, and to whom, more than any one else, Is- lamism was indebted for the popularity it had acquired. Moreover he was powerfully supported by the most influential chieftains of the Mussulmans, Omar and Othman, who preferred to see the dignity of caliph, to which they themselves probably aspired, intrusted to a man sixty years old, the age of Abu-Beker, rather than to Ah, a young man, who, having, acccording to the ordinary course of na- ture, the prospect of a long life, would likely prevent them from ever becoming caliphs. Abu-Beker therefore was elected, and immediately took the census of his subjects. Having found one hundred and twenty four thou- sand Mussulmans, he did not doubt but that he might, with these forces, undertake and execute great projects. After quelling some se- ditions among the Arabs, and driving the Persians from the ancient Chaldea, he raised three armies for the invasion of Syria, under the command of three valiant chieftains, Kaled, Abu-Obey da and Am- rou. Their first attack was directed against the frontier towns, Bos- tra. Palmyra, and some others which were easily conquered. Kaled, who was the commander in chief, then went, at the head of fifty thousand men, to lay siege to the important city of Damascus. Nei- ther the eourage of the citizens and garrison, nor the exertions of the troops sent to their assistance, could save the town from the hands of the infidels. It was tal^en by them at the end of six months, and most of its brave inhabitants were inhumanly slaughtered, by the or- der of Kaled. This happened on the 30th of August (634), and was the last event of the reign of Abu-Beker, who diecf on that very day, at the age of nearly sixty-three years, after having appointed Omai his successor. The death of one cahph and the accession of another made no al- teration in the plans, and put no hindrance to the progress of the Saracens. The only change that arose was, that Abu-Obeyda re- ceived the chief command of their troops, in the place of Kaled whose temper was too violent and sanguinary. This terrible, but truly mag- 168 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 3. uanimous warrior^, descended without a murmur to an inferior rank, and declared that this circumstance would by no means prevent him from making the utmost exertions for the public welfare. Such was the heroic spirit of the Arabs of that period: religious enthusiasm raised iheir minds above the ordinary feelings of nature, and kept them ever ready to sacrifice their private interests and personal views on the altar of patriotism. However, as Kaled possessed surprising activity and great talents for war, he continued, under Abu-Obeyda, to direct the operations of the army, and this good understanding of the two generals greatly facilitated their success. In the meantiuie, the Greeks and the Syrians, roused by their ex- treme danger, opposed in different parts of the invaded country, a formidable resistance which cost the lives of many Saracens, particu- larly in the neighborhood of fortified places whose garrisons frequently made vigorous and successful sallies. Heraclius also was exerting himself in taking measures to preserve Syria. Having raised a nu- merous array, he placed it under the command of a general named Manuel, who immediately w^ent in search of the Saracens. It did not take him long to find them; at the news of his approach. Obey da and Kaled had assembled their forces, and stationed them on the banks of a river near the city of Yarmouth : on that spot the furious and bloody engagement took place, that almost annihilated the Roman power in those provinces. During the battle, which lasted several days, women seemed to vie with men for the prize of courage. On the first day, the Greeks animated equally by despair and by the su- periority of their numbers, three times put the Saracens to flight, and three times the fugitives returned to the field, spurred on by the railleries of their wives, who were placed at the rear with the great standard of Mahomet. Not less sharp and obstinate was the fight of the following day. At last the Christians being not only harassed, but also betrayed, were entirely defeated, and lost more than a hun- dred thousand men, many of whom fell by the exterminating sword of the Arabs; some perished in the river; and others were taken prisoners. The conquerors seized the occasion of improving their victory, by the pursuit of the vanquished, and by the capture of those places in Syria and Palestine, that were yet subjected to the empire. Je- rusalem, in particular, was the grand object of their views. Mahomet had always professed a peculiar veneration for that holy city, and had transmitted that veneration to his followers, Avho ardently desired to have the town in their possession. Accordingly, only one month after the battle of Yarmouth, Omar sent to his generals an order to march into Palestine and attack Jerusalem. The city, though desti- tute of all hope of assistance from Heraclius, resisted during several A. D. 639 — 644. SARACENS IN EGYPT. 169 months all the efforts of the enemy, but was in the end compelled to surrender. The caliph went himself from Arabia to treat of the capitulation, granted mild conditions to the inhabitants, and solemnly took possession of the town in May, (a. d. 637). Aleppo, Antioch, Tyre, Cassarea, etc. fell also about the same time under the power of the victorious Arabs, and the conquest of Syria and Palestine was completed by them in the space of six years. The conquest of Mesopotamia cost them still less time and fatigue. One year was sufficient to subdue that country, for which the Ra- mans and Persians had fought during many centuries. Edessa, Nisibis, and other towns, so famous in antiquity for the glory of their arms, as well as for the flourishing state of Christianity within their walls, scarcely dared make any resistance, and submitted to the Ma- hometan yoke. All this happened during the reign of Herachus, who was now disgracing by indolence the glory which he had formerly acquired, and who seemed to have lived, merely to behold the loss of his finest provinces. He died in the year 641, the thirty-first of his reign, and sixty-seventh of his age, leaving the Greek empire in a condhion nearly as deplorable as that from which he had rescued it some years before. After him, Constantino Heraclius and Heracleonas his sons, occupied the throne ten months only, and Constant II, his grand-son^ who occupied it twenty-seven years, did Hltle else than persecute the Church and tyrannize over his subjects. CONQUESTS OF THE SARACENS IN EGYPT.— a. d. 639—644. Sovereigns of this description were certainly incapable of checking the progress olf the Saracens, whose armies had already penetrated into Egypt. The leader of their forces in that envied country, was Amrou, a brave general, who has been already mentioned. Uniting wisdom and prudence v/ith intrepidity, he first took different towns either by capitulation or surprise, and at length appeared in sight of the populous city of Alexandria. Like other great generals, Amrou trusted to no one but himself foi the precautions and measures to be taken in war. In order then to become well acquainted with the position and strength of the town, he himself went to examine its outworks, accompanied only by a slave called Verdan, and Mulisma, one of his chief officers. Having approached too near the wall, they were apprehended, and brought before the governor of the place, who asked them upon what grounds the Mahometans had come to attack Alexandria. Amrou replied 15 170 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 3. that their view was, either to make the Greeks embrace the rehgion of Mahomet, or compel them, sword in hand, to pay an annual fribute to the caliph. So bold an answer led the governor to believe that the man who gave it, was certainly the general of the Saracen troops : *' This is Amrou himself," said he to his officers ; " let him be beheaded.'* Verdan, who understood Greek, seeing the imminent danger of his master, turned to him, and giving him a violent blow, said in an angry tone: '^ Why do you, who are the least of the Mussulmans, take upon yourself to answer? Let your superiors speak." Then Mulisma, raising his voice, said that the general of the Mahometans, desirous to treat with the governor, had sent them to demand an in- terview ; and, if the Greeks were disposed to otfer or accept reasona- ble conditions, peace would be soon concluded. This stratagem had the desired effect. The governor, believing now tUat he had been mistaken about these men, dismissed them unmolested; but, instead of the proposed interview, Amrou, on the following day, showed himself with his whole army near the walls of Alexandria, and immediately commenced the siege (a. d 640). It lasted fourteen months, during which the Saracens lost twenty- three thousand men, who were siain either in different assaults, or in the frequent sallies made by the garrison. At last, they took the city by storm, and putting to the sword many of its brave defenders drove the others into the country, whither they were pursued by Amrou. Still, many of them had time to embark in the vessels which they found in the harbor ; they soon returned, re-entered the city, and slew all the Saracens whom Amrou had left there. At this melancholy news, he hastened back with his troops, and finding the Greeks already in possession of the fortress, attacked them without delay, and, notwithstanding their vigorous resistance, drove them from this their last retreat. Those who escaped the destructive sword of the conquerors, re -embarked with precipitancy, and abandoned to the Saracens this powerful city, which had been so long the greai store-house, as it were, of Rome and Constantinople, the honor of the empire, and the centre of commerce in the East. It lost then tliese noble prerogatives, and the whole province passed with it under the Mussulman sway. At this time also, literature suffered an irreparable loss by the con- flagration .of the Alexandrian library, which contained upwards of five hundred thousand volumes. Amrou sent deputies to consult the Caliph, and ask him what was to be done with so many books; Omar answered that, being useless if they agreed with the Koran, and dangerous if they differed from it, in either case they were to be destroyed. The Mussulman general, who was not less A. D. 632—656.] SARACENS in persia, etc. 171 moderate after victory than intrepid in battle, reluctantly, but puno lually, obeyed the order : the books were distributed throughout the various quarters of the city, and served, it is said, to warm the public baths during six months. No sooner was Egypt entirely subdued, than Amrou, proceeding farther west, carried his victorious arms into Lybia, and would have made still greater progress, had not the death of Omar occasioned his return. This caliph was murdered at Medina, in 644, by a Persian slave, to whose complaints against his master he had refused to hsten. Othman, another celebrated personage among the Arabs, was imme- diately chosen to succeed him ; still, the death of Omar created deep affliction in the heart of every true Mussulman. Of all the caliphs, he is, to this day, the most revered among the Mahometans, at least those called Sunnites (see p. 174), as having contributed most to the increase of their civil and religious power. In fact, according to an ancient historian, he conquered, v/ithin the space of ten years and a half, thirty-six thousand towns or fortresses. Syria, Mesopotamia, nearly all Persia, Egypt and Lybia, were subdued by his generals ; and, what is still more surprising, these conquests were not less se- cure and permanent, than they had been rapid and extensive, owing to the wisdom and firmness with which the caliph governed — his staff, to use the expression, of the Arabs, being more respected than the sword of his successors. This wonderful success of Omar's administration produced no change in his morals, no alteration in his manner of life, which was quite plain and even austere. Careless about his own ease, he every Friday distributed the money of the treasury to the poor, according to the wants of every individual. Historians highly praise also his love of justice, though they admit that he sometimes carried it to an excess t>ordering on cruelty, and that he was not always faithful to his promises. CONQUESTS OF THE SARACENS IN PERSIA, RHODES AND OTHER COUNTRIES.— A. d. 632—656. Othman completed the subjugation of Persia, which had been commenced under Abu-Beker and vigorously prosecuted under Omar. This kingdom was, in consequence of its frequent revolutions and the victories of Pleraclius, nearly shorn of its strength ; and Isde- gerdes III, who, in 632, ascended the throne at the age of fifteen years, was too young to defend it with success against the attacks of the Mus- Kulmans At the same time that they invaded Syria, thirty thousand 172 MODEEN HISTORY. [PART 3. of their warriors carried the sword of destruction to the banks of the Euphrates and Tigris. They were commanded, in this first period of tiieir progress, by Saad, one of the heroes of the Saracens, who achieved in Persia exploits equal to those of Kaled in Syria, and of Amrou in Egypt. The Persians, on their side, hke the Syrians and the Greeks, roused themselves to a new exertion of that courage which they had so frequently displayed in former and better times. They made incredible efforts to avert the storm and secure their inde- pendence ; nor could the Saracens truly look upon themselves as the conquerors and masters of Persia, as long as there were inhabitants to defend it against invasion. No later than the year 636, a great battle was fought near the town of Cadesia between the Mussulman troops commanded by Saad, and an army of Persians amounting to one hundred and twenty thousand men, under the command of Rostan, the bravest of their generals. This battle, which is as famous among oriental nations as that of Arbela between Alexander and Darius (b. c. 331), was continued three days, with the utmost fury on bath sides. The Saracens lost nearly eight thousand, and the Persians upwards of sixty thousand men ; Isdegerdes was obliged to fly to the remotest parts of his king- dom, where he hoped he would be better able to muster new forces. The Mussulmans, before pursuing him, marched to Ctesiphon, or Modin, the capital city of Persia, and took it at the first onset. They found in it immense treasures and effects of inestimable value, the pillage of which enriched them, and, by a necessary consequence, made them lose the noble simplicity and plainness of their ancestors. Still, their warlike and enthusiastic spirit was ever the same, as clearly appeared when Saad, a few months after the capture of Mo- din, received from the caliph an order to go forward in pursuit of Isdegerdes. This intrepid general, with an ardor not to be surpassed, led his troops through the deserts and mountains of Persia, from one extremity to the other of this vast empire. Having overtaken the king at Gialola, in the province of Korasan, he gained over him a second victory as bloody and decisive as that of Cadesia. The unfor- tunate monarch was driven entirely from his dominions, and forced to apply for refuge and assistance to the petty neighboring tribes. A third battle gave the deadly blow to the Persian monarchy. Rostan, summoning aH who could bear arras, raised another very numerous army, with which he determined to make a last and des- perate effort for the support of this tottering empire. Nooman, at that time commander of the Saracens, in the place of Saad who was engaged in subduing important provinces, did not avoid the battle. It took place near Nahavend, and was for a long time disputed with incredible animosity and valor. Nooman perisned in the conflict. Jy. B. 632 — ^oQ.I SARACENS IN PERSIA, ETC. 173 and the Saracens were about to abandon the field, when Hoda'ifa, a brave officer, revived their courage, and rushing at their head against the enemy, so broke his ranks, and made such a slaughter, as to gain at last a decided and most signal advantage, which the Arabs call the victor]) of victories. From this time forward, the Persians did not venture to appear any more~ in the open field ; cities every where opened their gates to the conquerors, a very few only having dared to make some show of resistance. It was in vain that Isdergerdes once more endeavored to retrieve his losses ; his last troops were easily overtliiown, and he himself, being again obliged to fly, was put to death by discontented auxdiaries. Thus ended the second Persian empire (a. d. 651), after having lasted four hundred and twenty-five years from its res- toration in 226. The Arabian power was now fully established in that kingdom, and the surviving population adopted the religion of Mahomet. About the same time, the Saracens made other conquests in vari- ous countries, but neither so secure nor so important. The reduc- tion of the island of Cyprus was but transient, it being shortly after reconquered by the Christians. Nearly the same happened to Arme- nia; but Nubia, in the south of Egypt, was rendered tributary, and the conquest of the island of Rhodes proved more lasting. Moaviah, a brave and skilful general, entirely subdued it in 653. The famous Colossus, or brazen statue of the sun, which the Rhodians had erected (b. c. about 300), after their deliverance from a powerful enemy (Demetrius Poliorcetes), was still lying on the ground. It was at least one hundred and five feet high, its other dimensions being in proportion ; each finger was larger than a man of ordinary size; and being placed at the entrance of the harbor upon two oppo- site rocks which served as pedestals, ships could p^iss without diffi- culty between the feet of the statue. It was thrown down by an earthquake, after having stood fifty-six years ; and it remained upon the shore for about nine centuries, when the Saracens, now masters of the island, sold the broken parts of the Colossus to a Jewish merchant, who loaded with them nine hundred camels: this sup- poses the whole weight to have been seven hundred and twenty thousand pounds. 13 174 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 3; DISSENSIONS AMONG THE SARACENS.— a. d. 656—6(58. The progress of the Saracens in Asia was now checked for a thne by various obstacles, the greatest of which arose from among them- selves. It was occasioned by the death of Caliph Othman, who, having provoked general discontent by the singularity of his deport- ment, and his partiality for his relatives upon whom he blindly lavished the dignities and treasures of the state, fell by the swords of assassins at the age of eighty- two years (a. r. 656). The right of succeeding him was claimed simultaneously by AH, the son-in-law of Mahomet, and by Moaviah, the conqueror of Rhodes. A civii war ensued, which, though bloody, left the question undecided ; til] Ah, being murdered in 661 by a certain fanatic of his own party^ and his son Assan dying after the lapse of some years, Moaviah re- mained sole and undisputed master. He chose Damascus for his residence, and was the head of the Ommiade dynasty, which reigned over the Saracens ninety-two years. But, although Moaviah succeeded in uniting under his sway all the parts of their empire, the hatred of the two parties did not abate: founded, not only on the difference of political pretensions, but also on the disagreement of rehgious doctrines, it continued 'to subsist, and has even continued almost to this day the cause .of frequent and bloody wars between the Persians who adhere to the sect of Ali, and the Turk^la#i€r are followers of Omar and Moaviah. The preference jriven to Abu-Beker over Ali (see p. 167), is commonly assigned as the origin of this lasting animosity. According to the Persians, Ali was the lawful successor of Mahomet, and the three first caliphs were mere usurpers, as well as the Ommiades, who reigned after them to the detriment of the Fatimites, or offspring of AH by his wife Fatime, Mahomet's daughter. The Turks, on the contrary, call themselves Sunnites, or orthodox, attached to the traditions of their Mahometan ancestors, and give to the Persians the name of Shyiles, that is to say, schismatics and sectarians. PROSPERITY OF THE GREEK EMPIRE UNDER CONSTAN- TINE--POGONATUS.— A. d. 668—685 Another great obstacle with which the Mussulmans of this period met in their career of invasion, was the superior ability of the Greek emperor, Constantine IV, or Pogonatus. No sooner had his father. Constant II, been slain by his own servants (a. d. 668), than ha A. D. 668 — 685. GREEK EMPIRE, ETC. 175 seized, with a resolute hand, the helm of the state. He commenced his reign by punishing the murderers of his father, and bringing to a speedy termination some dangerous seditions. Having succeeded in this, -he found a still better opportunity of manifesting the energies of his soul, in the defence of his capital city against the attacks of the Saracens. During seven years in succession (673-679), the numerous armies of Caliph Moaviah presented themselves before the walls of Con- stantinople, and battered them with all kinds of military engines; but they were constantly repelled, and finally obhged to retreat. Their failure was owing to their want of prudence and experience with regard to the attack of fortified places, inasmuch as they retired every winter, and were afterwards obliged to recommence the siege as if nothing had hitherto been done; and also to the unwearied courage and activity which the emperor and his troops displayed all that time. Among the various means which they took to baffle the efforts of the enemy, none was of greater service to them than the Grecian fire, which had been lately invented by a Syrian named Cal- hnicus. This man, having come from Heliopolis to Constantinople, carried thither the secret of that famous composition, which for many centuries rendered innumerable services to the Greeks in their diffe- rent wars. It was used for the first time during this siege, and caused dreadful ravages among the Saracens. Burning even in water, and directing its blaze downwards, that terrible fire consumed both men and ships, and even iron and stones, before it could be extinguished ; for which purpose they were obliged to make use of sand or vinegar. The Mussulmans, unable to bear up against this mode of warfare, abandoned their undertaking, after it had already cost them a consi- derable part of their fleet and army. The remainder was not less unfortunate, when they attempted to retreat. All the vessels were, in consequence of a furious tempest, driven on shore, and broken agamst the rocks or swallowed up by the waves ; while the land sol- diers, worn out with fatigue and afflicted by a Contagious disease, were quickly overtaken by the Greeks, and cut in pieces, to the num- ber, it is said, of thirty thousand men. Other bodies of Mussulman troops were likewise entirely defeated by the Maronites, or inhabi- tants of Mount Libanus. These multiphed losses induced Moaviah to sue for peace; it was granted on condition of an annual tribute; and Pogonatus had thus the honor of compelling the most powerfui prince of that time, to become a tributary of the empire. The state was beginning to recover its ancient splendor, when the Bulgarians, a barbarous nation, until then very little known, m^de settlements near Thrace on the banks of the Danube. Notwithstaiid- 176 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 3. ing the wisdom of the measures adopted by the emperor to drive them back, his army was vanquished, and he found himself obhged to condude a treaty, not very honorable indeed, but necessary for the tranquillity of his subjects. He then applied, with great zeal and success, to restore the peace of the Church, which had been consider- ably disturbed in the East by new heresies. This good, just and pious prince died in the eighteenth year of a reign generally pros- perous and glorious (a. d. 685). After his death, the court of Constantinople exhibited, during thirty years, an almost uninterrupted series of treasons and revolutions, which it Avould be equally tedious and useless to relate. Civil wars were also carried on among the Saracens for the possession of the supreme power, until Abdel Malek, the fourth successor of Moa- viah, by repeated victories, destroyed his competitors, prostrated their partisans, and was acknowledged sole caliph in 691. CONQUESTS OF THE SARACENS IN AFRICA.— a. d. 644—710. This event enabled the Arabs to resume their former course of pro- selytism and conquest; not so much however in the eastern part of the Greek empire, where they now suffered frequent defeats, as in other countries. Whilst some of their armies penetrated into India, others, taking the opposite direction, reached the western extremity of the African shores. Yet this did not happen till after a long struggle and repeated efforts, the subjugation of Africa having been, of all their conquests in the civilized world, the most arduous and painful. Amrou had commenced it in the year 644 ; a second ex- pedition was undertaken in 647 under Abdalla, his successor in the government of Egypt. With an army of forty thousand brave war- riors, he advanced as far as Tripoli, a town advantageously situated on the coast of the Mediterranean sea opposite to Sicily. For want of ships and engines of war, he could take neither that city nor an- other which he likewise attacked ; but in the following year, he sig- nalized himself by a more brilliant expedition. At the approach of the Mussulman troops, the Patrician Gregory, who commanded in those parts, had assembled one hundred and twenty thousand men, either Greeks or natives, and inspired them with his own ardor for the defence of the country. He attached the Saracens near Yakoube, and these enthusiastic adventurers, though far inferior in numbers, willingly accepted the offer of battle. Noth- ing indeed ever surpassed the animosity of the combatants on each side, nor was any battle ever conducted in a more singular manner. A. T>. 64:4 — 710. SAKACENS IN AFRICA. 177 Every day, at the rising of the sun, the two armies went forth from their camp, and fought valiandy until noon ; then equally exhausted by excess of heat and fatigue, they retired, as it were, by common agreement, and disposed themselves to recommence the next morning. This was done for several days in succession, without any decided advantage for either party ; till at last a stratagem of the Saracens rendered them completely victorious. By the advice of Zobeir, one of their most distinguished officers, part of their troops remained in the camp, ready to march at the first signal, whilst the others, early in the morning, Avent forward against the enemy. The engagement, as usual, was terrible and obstinately disputed, Zobeir purposely pro- longing the fight, in order to waste the strength of the Africans. At length the Saracens withdrew from the field, and laid aside their ar- mor, as if to take some repose; the Africans also, worn out with fa- tigue and burnt by the sun, began to retreat towards their camp. At this moment, the Saracen troops in reserve mounted their horses, and, with the indefiitigable Zobeir at their head, bore down upon a wearied enemy. This unexpected attack every where spread terror and confusion among the Africans, who fled in every direction. Gregory, having rallied some brave soldiers, endeavored, but in vain, to withstand the fury of the assailants : being pierced by a pike, he died on the spot which had been the theatre of his valor. After this, the fugitives were pursued with great slaughter, and the Saracens easily subdued all the country around, and obtained an immense booty. Still, as they had themselves suffered a great loss of men and horses, they did not, at this time, proceed farther, but, after having taken the precaution to leave garrisons in the. places which they had conquered, their army returned to Egypt (a. d. 648). No other troops were directed against Africa, for the space of seventeen years, namely until GG5, when a brave general, called Moa- viah, hke the celebrated caliph by whom he was sent, gained another victory near Tripoli ; but it had no great effect with regard to the fate of those regions. In 670, a more spirited and effectual effort was made by Oucba, another general full of ardor and enthusiasm, who had just received orders from the caliph to complete the subjection of the whole coast along the Mediterranean sea. This intrepid and fanatic warrior quickly overran all that part of Africa included in his commission. Torrents of Christian blood were spilt in the places which he subdued ; although, according to the rule laid down by Abu-Beker, he spared old people, women and children, and sent eighty thousand prisoners to Egypt. Not satisfied with depopulating the Roman provinces, he attacked and put to the sword the barbarians of Mount Atlas, and, having at length reached the shores of the Atlantic, he spurred on 178 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 3. his horse into the sea, and loudly expressed his regret that this bar- rier should oppose his farther progress. On his return, Oucba was guilty of great imprudence. Being too easily prompted lo believe that the country was entirely subdued, he dismissed or scattered his forces, and kept only five thousand men with him. This rashness caused his ruin. There were still many towns occupied by the Roman troops, the rapidity of Oucba's course not having permitted him to attack them, and drive them all from Africa. They assembled together with the natives, chose for their lea- der Kuscile, a Moorish prince greatly renowned for his courage and prudence, and marched against Oucba before he had time to collect his own troops. This undaunted man did not hesitate one instant to go and fight them with a handful of soldiers; determined as he was to die rather than lose his former glory, he met the confederates half way. V/hen, at the head of his five thousand warriors, he was in sight of that army of a hundred thousand men, he broke in pieces the scabbard of his sword; all his followers did the same, and then, with desperate fury, fell upon the enemy, wishing only to sell their lives as dearly as possible. In fact, not one of them died until he had slain at least his first antagonist, whether Roman or Moor, and the combat lasted as long as there remained one Saracen alive. Oucba was found dead upon a heap of enemies whom his sword had despatched; and the field of battle which is to this day called the field of Oucba, still bears testimony to his intrepid valor. This loss of the Saracens prevented, for many years more, the en- tire reduction of Africa. A. new attempt was made in 688 by Zuheir, another hero of Islamism not inferior to those already mentioned; but this undertaking, like the expedition of Oucba, although at first brilliantly successful, terminated, like the former, in the slaughter of Zuheir and all his troops. Thus did northern Africa repeatedly baflle the measures and foil the efforts of its invaders. But its final overthrow was now at hand. No sooner had Abdel Malek prostrated his competitors and their par- tisans, than he directed his attention towards the achievement of this important conquest, and raised for that purpose numerous armies, the command of which he intrusted to Hassan, then governor of Egypt. This general, equal in courage, and superior in skill and prudence, to his predecessors, instead of overrunning without any fixed object, the country which he -desired to conquer, marched di rectly tcr Carthage its capital, and took it by storm (a. d. G97). He left a garrison there, with every means of defence ; which, however, did not prevent the Romans from reconquering the city before the end of the same year. In the ensuing year (698), Hassan, after de- A. D. 711 — 718. SARACENS IN SPAIN. 179 feating them in a naval battle, took Carthage a secona time, and utterly destroyed that celebrated town, without any regard for its past glory or its prospects for the future. Thus was the death-blow given to Christianity and civilization in Africa. There was yet, it is true, some show of resistance on the part of the remaining Romans united with the Moors ; but the perse- vering efforts of the Saracens overcame all obstacles, and the whole region, from Egypt to the straits of Gadez or Gibraltar, was finally subdued in the year 710, the sixty-sixth after the first attempt made by Amrou. The generality of the natives gradually embraced the Mahometan religion ; and northern Africa soon became the chief quarter from which the Saracens issued forth to piUage the coasts of Italy and Sicily, and to invade the rich provinces of Spain CONQUESTS OF THE SARACENS IN SPAIN— a. d. 711—718. The Visigoths had possessed Spain during the space of two hun dred and fifty years, when the misconduct of a prince and the trea son of a subject overthrew their flourishing monarchy almost in a moment. King Roderic, shortly after his accession to the throne, dishonored by his immorality the family of Count Julian, one of the most distinguished of the nation. The exasperated nobleman, in order to avenge the insult, resolved to call in the Saracens of Africa. He conducted this fatal design with all the ardor, secrecy and ani- mosity of which the spirit of revenge is capable; and the greatest enemies of his religion and country were solicited by him to cross the straits, with assurances of a powerful assistance (a. d. 711). This proposal was readily accepted, and Musa, the Saracen gover- nor of Africa, sent an army composed of Arabs and Moors, under the command of Tarik, one of his ablest generals. Roderic had scarcely heard of the approach of the invaders, when he beheld them at the gates of bis kingdom. He summoned the strength of the nation to attend him in the field, and raised an army of a hun- dred thousand men, many of whom unfortunately were rather etieminate citizens than true soldiers. The Saracens bad scarcely one-third of that number, but nearly all of them were old warriors, accustomed to figbt, hardened against fatigues, proud of the con- quest o.f Africa, and eager in propagating the empire of the Koran by the elTusion of Christian blood. The two armies met near Xeres in Andalusia, and being animated, one by the necessity of defending the national liberty and religici:, the other by the love of glory and conquest, soon (iame to a furious 180 MODEBN" HISTORY. [PART 3. engagement. The animosity and obstinacy of the combatants made victory for a long- time doubtful; for, although the Gothic army was partly composed of a new and undisciphned mihtia, there was in it a Bufficient number of brave soldiers to withstand all the efforts of the Saracens, and the king himself gave such proofs of personal bravery, as could hardly have been expected in a man of his dissolute habits. All this raised among the Goths a cheering hope of the fortunate issue of the day in their favor, when a sudden treason caused victory to declare for their enemies. During the hottest part of the battle, two sons of King Vitiza whom Roderic had dethroned, joined the Arabs at the head of theix partisans, and attacking their countrymefl in the flank, threw them into irremediable confusion. The Goths frightened by so strange an event, lost courage and fled; the king, after using his utmost exer^ tions to rally the fugitives, was himself carried away by their multi- tudes, and disappeared; nor was his fate ever perfectly ascer- tained. His horse having been found, with the royal crown and mantle, at a short distance from a neighboring river, it was generally supposed that the unhappy monarch had been drowned. This day,' so fatal to his cause, was decisive in favor of the inva- ders, on account of the immense booty, and the great number of standards and prisoners that fell into their hands. From the slain among the conquerors, who lost sixteen thousand, may be gathered the terrible slaughter of the vanquished. But the most certain as well as most important result of the battle of Xeres, was the down- fall of the Gothic monarchy, which disappeared with the last of its sovereigns. The Saracens easily dispersed the remainder of its sup- porters, and directed their victorious course to those portions of Spain which they had not yet invaded. Musa, the African governor, ar- rived with new forces, and dividing them into three separate bodies, overran in a short time the whole peninsula from Gadez to the Pyrenees. The inhabitants were either put to the sword or made tributaries; the cities were destroyed, or compelled to submit to the Arabian yoke. In the northern part of Spain, however, a small number of Chris- tians preserved their independence. Under the guidance of Pelagic and Alfonso, two generous princes of royal descent, they retired from the invaded provinces to the remote and mountainous district of Asturias, where the conquerors at first perhaps disdained, and soon after were unable to attack them with success (a. d. 718), This was the beginning of the more recent kingdom of Spain, which gradually increased, but had to struggle for about eight hundred years, before it could be rendered as extensive as the first, by the entire overthrow of the Arabs and Moors in the Spanish peninsula. A.. D. 717—730. SARACENS DEFEATED, ETC*. 181 SARACENS DEFEATED IN THE EAST— LEO THE ISAURIAN. A. D. 717—730. The Saracens had now, in the lapse of ninety years, achieved as many conquests, as the ancient Romans had done in seven or eight centuries ; but the empire of the former was not settled upon so last- ing and solid a foundation as that of the latter. Even at the time which immediately followed the subjection of Spain, the Mussul- mans experienced signal defeats, whereby their power and glory were gready impaired. Having a second time attacked Constanti- nople, both by land and sea, they were again repulsed, with the loss of more than one hundred and twenty thousand men who perished by famine, cold, pestilence, or the sword of the enemy. Their fleet also, consisting of about eighteen hundred ships, was utterly destroy- ed, either by the fury of storms, or the violence of the Grecian fire. Only five ships escaped to convey to Syria the news of that frightful disaster (a. d. 718), The emperor of Constantinople at this period, was Loo the Isau- rian, a prince justly renowned for his military skill, which he admira- bly displayed during the siege of his capital. When he had delivered the empire from its enemies, he undertook a war of a very different nature, and much more worthy of a tyrant than of a wise sovereign. Unwilhng to comprehend that the veneration of images is only an inferior honor referred to the person whom they represent, he published a severe edict against the use of them in churches, as if it were an idolatrous practice; and thus gave rise to the sect of Icono- clasts, or Image-breakers. In obedience to the emperor's orders, the pictures and images of Christ and of his Saints were destroyed in many places, to the great scandal of the faithful, and not without much blood-shed and innumerable deeds of barbarous cruelty.* One of the most shocking, was the burning of the twelve learned and virtuous libra- rians (whom Leo had not been able to gain over to his party), toge- tlier with the public library of Constantinople (a. d. 730). This per- secution was carried on with the same and even greater violence by his successor, Constantino Copronymus, and continued to disturb both Church and State till the year 787, when, in the seventh general council,! the second of Nice, the relative honor paid to images was * See Thcophanes' Chronos:raphy p. 339 ;— Anastasius, in Pap. Grcgor,, II;— Flcury, Hist. 'Ecclcs. b. 42, 7i."5,— Lcbeau, Hist, du Bas. Emp. b. 03, n. 50 elc.voi. 13, 7>. 357—363. t The fifth gcpcral council had been held under Justinian, in 553, and tho Bixth, under Constantine Pogonatus in 080, (both at Constantinople); for tlie purpose of condemnini;; pernicious writings an.l doctrines connected with the Nestorian and Eutycluan heresies IG 182 ' ' MODERN" HISTORY. [PART 3. Eolemnly declared to be according to apostolic tradition, and to the practice of the primitive Church ; was confirmed by examples from Scriptures, and vindicated from the charge of idolatry and superstition. SARACENS DEFEATED IN FRANCE.— CHARLES MARTEL. ETC.— A. D. 731—752. In the west of Europe, the Arabs and Moors, after the conquest of Spain, looked upon France with a jealous eye, and wished to bring It also under their power. The first attempts which they made to this effect, had but little success, being repeatedly defeated by the brave resistance of Eudes, Duke of Aquitania. But, in 731, a new invasion took place that threatened not only France, but likewise all Christendom. Four hundred thousand Saracens, having at their head Abderame, a renowned general, crossed the Pyrenees, and driving every thing before them, filled whole provinces with terror and deso- lation. Their march every where exhibited one continued scene of conflagration, plunder, and bloodshed. They who had the good for- tune to escape the exterminating sword of the enemy, were seen flying in all directions. Eudes, who attempted to check the career of the Saracens, was defeated, and forced to abandon his dukedom to the victorious barbarians. They then advanced without obstacle as far as the river Loire, into the very heart of France, constantly marking their passage with the most frightful ravages. The French monarchy seemed to be on the brink of ruin; every day added to its dangers; but fortu- nately, it possessed at that time, in the person of Duke Charles, the greatest general of Christendom. This hero, who had been hitherto engaged in subduing the restless tribes of Germany, was no sooner informed of the progress of the Saracens, than he marched from the north with a choice body of thirty thousand warriors, and meeting the enemy between the cities of Poitiers and Tours, soon put an end to their triumphant and destructive course. Seven days were spent on each side in prepai'ing for a general engagement. On the eighth day, the French, animated by the pre- sence of their invincible leader, briskly charged the barbarians, and began to pierce the thickest battalions by the tremendous blows of their sabres and battle-axes. The Saracens sustained the attack with equal courage, and, though numbers of them fell dead, still vigor- ously resisted, by constantly opposing fresh troops to the impetuosity of the assailants. The battle Was fought in this manner for several hours, during which the Mussulman army was mowed down with A. D. 731 — 752. SARACENS DEFEATED, ETC. 183 uninterrupted and frightful slaughter. Towards the close of the day, Abderame fell among the dead. Night separated the combatants, who retired to their respective camps, but with very different feelings — the French, with the consciousness of their advantage, the Arabs, in deep consternation. These fierce invaders, a short time before so proud of past success, but now reduced to a small number, and sen- sible of their immense loss, availed themselves of the darkness to effect their retreat, and precipitately retraced their steps towards the Pyrenees. So great was the number of the Saracens wKo fell in the battle, that, according to many historians, it exceeded three hundred thou- sand, whereas the loss of the French scarcely amounted to fifteen hun- dred men. Hence the defeat of the former is considered by all as one of the most signal that ever happened, and the victory of the latter as one of the most complete, important and decisive ever gained, as it was thought to have saved, not only France, but all Europe from the yoke of barbarism and infidelity. It is also commonly believed that this was the day on which Charles acquired the surname of Martel (hammer), because, like a hammer, he had broken to pieces the weapons and crushed the power of the Saracens (a. d. 732). This great man continued to conquer all his enemies, and to go- vern France, as he had done before, with sovereign authority under the title of duke. There still existed kings and princes of the family of Clovis ; but they were generally weak and indolent, abandoning the cares of government to their prime-ministers. Pepin the Shoi't, who, in 741, inherited the power and great qualities of his father Charles, thought of taking the last step towards the throne. This appeared so much the easier, as existing circumstances seemed to favor the execution of his project; on one hand, the- mode of succes- sion of the last kings, which had bordered on the elective, and the inability of the present sovereign, Childeric III, contrasted with his own transcendent merit ; and on the other, the wishes of the French people, and the favorable, though very prudent, answer of Pope Zachary, who was consulted on the subject, emboldened him to prosecute his design.* Pepin therefore took his final resolution, and was proclaimed king in a general assembly of the nation (a. d. 752); Childeric having been in the mean time removed to a monastery, where he died three years after. In this prince ended the dynasty of the Merovingian sovereigns, after having occupied the French throne about three hun- dred years, during which it produced but few good and great mo- narclis. Dissensions and civil wars first weakened its powcj ; fre- quent indolence and incapacity completed its downfall. * See note F. 184 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 3. PEPIN, KING OF FRANCE.— A. d. 752—768. Pepin showed himself every way worthy of the high station to which he was now raised. He not only maintained profound tran- quillity in his kingdom, but extended its limits, and, from the very beginning of his reign, signalized himself by a brilliant expedition equally important in itself and in its consequences. By this time, the Lombards, already masters of a great part of Italy, aimed at subduing the whole, and indeed conquered the province ot Ravenna, which, under the name of Exarchate, had until then Delonged to the emperors of Constantinople. Rome itself being on the point of falling into their power. Pope Stephen sent to implore neces- sary succors from Constantine Copronymus, in whose name the government of Rome Was still exercised. But that emperor was too deeply engaged in warring against the images of the Saints, to think of sending troops against the Lombards. In this extremity, the Ro- mans embraced the last resource which was left them, that of calling the valiant monarch of the French to their assistance. The Pope went in person to France, where he was received with all possible honor and respect, and found the king and his lords ready to undertake the defence of Rome against its obstinate enemies. But before any act of hostility, and in order to prevent the effusion of Christian blood, deputies were sent, at the Pope's request, to Astol- phus, king of the Lombards, strongly to exhort him to do justice, and renounce his ambitious views. The fierce Lombard answered the proposal with threats and insults. Pepin then marched with his troops into Italy, and forcing the passage of the Alps, defeated the Lombards, and obliged Astolphus to shut himself up in Pavia, his capital, where, after a short siege, the vanquished prince consented to accept the terms of peace offered by the conqueror.' With the most solemn promises he agreed to restore the towns which he had taken, and to put every thing in the same state as before the war. Pepin, relying on his word, contrary to the advice of the pope who knew the character of Astolphus better, returned to France. Scarcely had he departed, when the perfidious Lombard recom- menced hostilities, and laid siegato Rome, around which he renewed all the the ravages of the late war; Stephen had recourse again to his royal protector, and Pepin again hastened across the Alps into Lombardy. His march was equally successful and rapid. Astol- phus dared not face him in the field, postponed no longer the execu- jdon of the stipulated treaty, and was moreover condemned to bear the expenses of the war. A. D. 752 — 768. PEPIN, KING OF FRANCE. 185 At this juncture, two ambassadors arrived from Constantinople, to claim for the emperor the restitution of the cities and provinces which had been usurped by the Lombards. Pepin answered, with a firm lone, that these countries being now his conquest as justly as any one obtained in a lawful war, it was quite surprising that the Greeks should claim for themselves the fruit of his labors, and the posses- sion of lands and places which they had been neither willing to de- fend, nor able to preserve: accordingly, as it was not for their master that he and his troops had undergone so many fatigues, it was not to him that he would resign what he had so justly acquired. The French king intended to make a donation of his conquests in Italy to Pope Stephen and his successors in the pontifical chair. After the Greek deputies had retired, he executed his resolution, by a solemn grant to the see of Rome of that part of Italy which is, on this account, called the Ecclesiastical State, and has ever since com- posed the temporal dominions of the popes. Before that time, they had been subject in civil matters to the Roman or Greek emperors: but, when the Roman empire no longer comprised the generality of Christendom; when, after its downfall in the West, there sprung up from its ruins innumerable states and kingdoms, whose pretensions, views and interests were different, nay, commonly opposite; it was the kind design and will of Divine providence, that the popes should become totally independent of the power and influence of any secular prince. This independence they obtained through the instru- mentahty of Pepin and his successor Charlemagne, who conferred on the Popes such an extent of temporal power as might enable them freely to exercise their spiritual authority.* The middle of the eighth century seemed destined to witness great changes in every part of the world. For, at that p&riod,. the Om- miades who had held the Mussulman sceptre for about a hundred years, were, after a bloody struggle, deprived of their ascendency by the Abassides, another powerful family among the Arabs. Abul-. Abbas was the first caliph of this new dynasty. His successor, Al- manzor, built on the left bank of the Tigris the splendid city of .Bag- dad, which he made his residence; and this city became, under the Abassides, what Damascus had been under the Ommiades, and Medina, under the first successors flf Mahomet. In the same time, Abderame, one of the Ommiades, having es- caped the ruin of his family, fled from Asia to Spain, where he found the power of the Saracens much weakened by their late de- feats in France, by the progress of the Christians in Asturias, and by their own dissensions and feuds. Putting himself at the head of one of the contending parties, he overcame the others, and founded See note G. 16* 186 MODEKN HISTORY. [PART 3. a kingdom free from 'ill allegiance to the caliphs of Bagdad. Cordova was the capital of this new empire. The late defeats just mentioned, of the Saracens m France, had been achieved by King Pepin. This warlike monarch drove them entirely beyond the Pyrenees, added Aquitania to his dominions, and moreover enabled himself, by his activity and constant vigilance, to render his arms equally formidable to the various nations of Ger- many. Broken dovsrn by the hardships of so many campaigns, rather than by old age, he died in the fifty-fourth year of his life, the seventeenth year of his reign,, and the twenty-seventh of his poli- tical and public career (a. d. 768). Valor, prudence, all the endowments of a noble mind and a generous soul, though somewhat tinged with ambition, contributed to make Pepin an almost accomplished monarch. He possessed a surprising talent for conciliating esteem, respect and affection. Al- though his birth did not call him to the throne, he ascended it with general applause, and, from the beginning, so well established his authority, that no mention is made of the least rebellion during his reign. Prudence was his predominant quality, and one of the great- est praises that could, in after ages, be bestowed on a prince, was to say of him: ^'^He is as prudent as Pepin.'' In a word, being the son of one hero and the father of another^ he appeared worthy of both, and historians observe that every thing was remarkable in him, except his size from which he derived the surname of Short. But even that, although for many persons an object of raillery, be- came for Pepin an occasion of glory. On a certain day, as he was witnessing the combat of a bull and a lion exhibited for the amuse- ment of the court, he turned to his attendants, and asked which of them felt hold enough to separate those furious beasts. Not one dared make the attempt. *' Mine then shall be the task," replied Pe- pin; and leaping into the circus, he went to the lion which he killed by a single blow of his cimeter, and with another stroke cut off the head of the bull. Ail extolled his bravery, and acknowledged the impropriety of their railleries. CHARLEMAGNE, KING OF FRANCE AND LOMBARDY. A. D. 768—800. It would have been no small honor for the successor of Pepin, to follow the footsteps of this great prince. Charles his eldest son, did more than this ; he surpassed him, and by the invincible firmness of his mind, the superiority of his genms, and the incredible number of A. D. 768—800. CHARLEMAGNE, KING, ETC. 187 his exploits, raised the French monarchy to the highest degree of splendor that it ever attained. In effect, a continual series of victories gained over the Saxons, the Lombards, the Saracens, the Greeks, the Avari, and other na- tions; the conquest of Saxony, Bavaria, Noricum, Austria, Pannonia, Bohemia, and of a considerable part of Italy and Spain; the diligent and wise administration of his extensive dominions, during a great number of years; the civilization of Germany; the revival of sciences and hterature ; the re-establishment of the western empire with all Its prerogatives in favor of the French monarch and of his successors: such are the splendid characteristics with which the reign of Charle- magne presents itself to the admiration of posterity. He began by chastising the Aquitanians now armed against him, and the Saxons who, at the other extremity of his kingdom, had made inroads upon his territory. After this double campaign, he was called into Italy for a still more glorious and useful expedition against Desiderius, king of the Lombards, who obstinately refused to abide by the treaty concluded by his predecessor Astolphus with Pepin. That restless and ambitious prince was even threatening the city of Rome, nor could the favorable conditions which were offered him, prevail upon him to give satisfaction. Charles therefore resolved, at the entreaties of the Romans, to af- ford them speedy relief, and rescue them from their foe by measures more vigorous and efficacious than mere exhortations. After the example of his father in hke circumstances, he crossed the Alps at the head of a gallant army, put the Lombards to flight, and in a few weeks rendered himself master of almost all the country which they possessed between the Po and the mountains. Still, Pavia, their capital, where Desiderius had taken his last refuge, resisted for six months; during that time Charles, whilst the siege was continued by his troops, went to Rome, and visited Pope Adrian I, a pontiff equally conspicuous for his ability and virtue. The pope received his royal guest with great joy and extraordinary honors, and Charles in return manifested his respectful attachment to the Apostohc See, by ratifying and augmenting the donation which Pepin had made in its favor. Upon his return to the camp before Pavia, King Desiderius surrendered at discretion. Charles spaicd his life, but sent him to a distant monastery, and, by bemg crowned and acknowledged in his place, annihilated the separate kingdom of Lombardy, which had lasted two hundred and six years (a. D. 774). Scarcely was this important conquest achieved, when he was ear- nestly begged to pass over to Spain, for the purpose of resetting some Moorish prmces, his alUes or tributaries, from their oppressors of the 188 MODEEN HISTORY. [PART 3. same nation. Complying with the request, he subdued the north of the Spanish peninsuia with as much facility as he had subdued the north of Italy, and with a very trifling loss. But, as he was leading back his victorious troops to France, being himself at the head of the van-guard, the rear was defeated by the Gascons in the defdes of the Pyrenees (a. d. 778). This however neither impaired his personal reputation, nor made him lose the fruit of his campaign. Immediately after his return, Charles had to renew the war against the Saxons. This warlike and savage people, though conquereu many times before, did not cease, by their yearly revolts, to trouble the French monarch, and furnish him with continual occasions of exerting his valor, and exercising towards them his clemency or his justice. ,On the return of almost every spring, they signahzed their ferocious courage, by laying waste the countries situated between the Rhine and the Weser. As often indeed as they took up arms, Charlemagne forced them to submit, and to implore his mercy; but he had, among their chiefs, an implacable enemy, whom nothing could subdue. Always at the head of the rebels, this fierce warrior, when defeated, disappeared for a time, and, like another Arminius, returned to renew the attack as soon as he perceived in the attempt a gleam of success. Witikind was the name of this undaunted Saxon. He spent the time during the absence of Charles, in urging his countrymen to take up arms again ; and they, readily complying with the summons, overthrew all the monuments of religion and foreign power which existed in that part of Germany. Some French troops having en- deavored to suppress the rebeUion, were themselves, through the misunderstanding of their generals, defeated and cut in pieces. Charlemagne, htde accustomed to receive such news, was much afflicted at this event, and lost no time in repairing, or at least in checkiDg the evil. He marched in person at the head of a new army, and suddenly appearing among the Saxons, again forced them to submission. They came to him in great fear, and supphantly sued for pardon, ascribing the guilt of the late revolt to Witikind who had now taken refuge among the Danes. But Charles, as dissatis- fied with this excuse as he was exasperated at their continual acts of rebellion, and not believing it possible to tame their ferocious spirit otberwL'se than by exercising severe justice, required the other chief rebels to be immediately dehvered into h'is hands, and sentenced them to be beheaded on the same day, to the number, it is said, of four thousand five hundred. He had intended, by this rigorous chastisement, to inspire the whole nation with a salutary and lasting fear; but the deep mourn- ing which it first occasioned, was quickly turned into fresh and A. D. 768 — 800. CHARLEMAGNE, KING, ETC. 189 ungovernable animosity. Witikind once more re-appeared, and going through the different parts of the country, infused into every breast his own fury and desire of revenge. Fury however was of little avail against the warlike genius and activity of the French monarch. He attacked them before they could muster all their forces, defeated them in three bloody battles, and did not cease during three years to visit with a terrible retribution every quarter of that unhappy region. Still, Charles ardently desired the end of a war which proved so destructivb and fatal to his subjects, as well as to his enemies. Re- suming therefore his former course of moderate measures, more con- formable to his character than measures of rigor, he undertook to gain by mildness the very men whom the utmost severity and the most terrible disasters could scarcely subdue. Through his deputies, he represented to the Saxon leaders how many calamities they had brought upon their countrymen and upon themselves, and promised them not only entire safety, but even great honors, if they would lay down their arms. At first, Witilvind and Abbon, another renowned chieftain, could hardly believe that the king was sincere in offering them such favor- able conditions; but being at last induced to rely on his word, they went boldly to meet him. Charles received them with so much kind- ness, and treated them with such generosity, that they did not hesi- tate any longer to swear inviolable fidelity to so great a prince, and asked to be instructed in the Christian religion, which they sincerely embraced (a. d. 785). This step was followed by the entire reduc- tion of Saxony. Partial revolts, it is true, continued to exercise for gome years the activity of Charlemagne ; but these were much more easily checked than the former; and, in order to prevent their revival in future, thirty thousand Saxon famiHes were transported from tlie north of Germany to other parts of tlie French empire. At length, after an obstinate struggle of thirty years, this extensive country was entirely subdued, and being now reckoned among the dominions of the French king, consented to receive the two-fold benefit of civiliza- tion and Christianity. But new wars were threatening in other quarters. The conquests made by the French having awakened the fears and jealousy of the neighboring nations, their sovereigns concluded for their mutual sup- port a powerful league, which, however, only afforded Charlemagne an occasion to gain new laurels and to enlarge his empire. All his enemies fell into the very snare they had prepared for him. He subdued the Ravarians, conquered the Greeks, carried his victorious arms mto Pannonia, and defeateaix. Maitre absolu de ses peuples il mit sa gloire a en etre le pere ; et il eut e plaisir de voir qu'il en ^tait aim^, autant qu'il en dtait craint. Restaura- teur des beaux-arts et des lettres en France, il fut encore le bienfaiteur le plus liberal aussi bien que I'enfant le plus soumis de I'^glise; ses victoires furent pour elle des conquetes, et le fruit le plus doux qu'il recueillit de tant de combats, ce fut d'^tendre le royaume de J^sus-Christ, a proportion qu'il ^tendait le sien. — L 'accusation d'incontinence est la seule tache qui pourrait obscurcir ses vertus; mais il n'est pas difficile de le justifier de ce reproche. . . . Que s'il a comrais quelque faute en ce genre, il en aura fait penitence avant sa mort, comme nous devons le prdsumer de la piet€ n'un prince si religieux, et qui par mortification portait un cilice sous sea habits. — En un mot, Charlemagne fut le hdros de son siecle, le protecteur ie plus 7A[6 de la religion, le plus puissant des rois qui aient gouvernd la France, et I'un des plus grands princes qui aient jamais occup'5 aucun des divers trones de I'univers. — F. J. Longueval, Hi^ioirc dc VEglise gallic, ad ann. S14. 200 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 4. LOUIS THE DEBONNAIRE AND HIS SONS.— a. d. 814— SH FEUDAL SYSTEM. Charlemagne was succeeded by his son Louis, surnamed the Pimia or the Debonnaire, who had shown until then much wisdom in the government of Aquitania, and great courage in his expeditions against the Saracens of Spain. His virtues indeed accompanied him to the throne; but his talents were inadequate to this new and much more exahed station. Nearly the whole of his reign was spent in adopting false and impolitic measures which drew contempt upon his authority, and the most humiliating disasters upon his person. Twice he was outrageously reviled and deposed by his own sons and ministers, and twice also was he re-established by the exertions ol his affectionate subjects. These troubles and revolutions greatly weakened the French monarchy, and permitted the Saracens on one side, and the Normans on the other, to ravage with impunity the coasts of Italy and France. Louis died in 840, leaving three sons who divided the empire among themselves. France was allotted to Charles the Bald; Ger- many to another Louis; and Italy to Lothaire, with the title of em- peror. This last, who had been the chief promoter of the late dis- turbances and rebellions against his father, undertook also to deprive his brothers of their rights. Charles and Louis, not being able to produce a change in his sentiments, united their forces against him, and completely defeated him in the fierce battle of Fontenay near Auxerre, which cost the lives of a hundred thousand men. Lothaire fled to Aix-la-Chapelle, and shortly after was compelled to retire into his Italian dominions: but the conquerors not knowing how to en- sure the permanency of their victory, the civil war still continued for a time, without any important result, except a waste of their forces and the misery of their subjects. These circumstances, added to the continual piracies of the barbarians on all sides, more and more de- based the family of Charlemagne, and prepared its downfall. The want of prudence and firmness in Charles the Bald occasioned another evil which proved the ruin of public tranquillity, particularly in France. Until that time, the presidency and government of pro- vinces, dukedoms and counties, had been temporary and reversible charges; but towards the middle of the ninth century, they were per mitted to become hereditary dignities, transferable from father to son This considerably increased the power of their possessors to the det riment of the royal authority, and completed the organization of tho A. D. 800 — 88G. ARABIAN AND GREEK EMPIBES. 201 feudal sy^taii or compact between lords and vassals, which was for several centuries the basis of the political constitution of Western Europe where it occasioned innum erable disturbances and civil wars. ARABIAN AND GREEK EMPIRES DURIIS G THE NINTH CENTURY.— A. D. 800— 88G. Not dissimilar to the empire founded by Charlemagne, was that of the Arabs in Asia and Africa, It reached the summit of its glory under Aaron Al-Raschid, and declined under his successors, none of whom displayed abilities equal to those of this celebrated caliph. He waged war against the Greeks with uninterrupted success, and obliged the famous empress Irene, and after her, the emperor Nicepho- rus, to pay him a heavy tribute. No Mussulman prince, except per- haps Caliph Omar, was ever more absolute, or knew better how to enforce submission. It was enough for him, when he had the least suspicion or discontent against his generals and governors of provin- ces, to send them word to resign their offices ; the order obtained immediate and punctual obedience. Aaron sometimes carried his severity to excess, and whilst, on one hand, he exercised uncommon liberality and benificence, he is said to have, on the other, occasionally set aside the rights of equity and gratitude in order to indulge his ill-grounded suspicions and capri- cious feelings. He is however styled the Just, probably for some re- markable acts of justice that he performed, or for the just protec- tion which he granted to literature, arts and sciences. In effect, he contributed more than any other caliph, to raise the Eastern Mussul- mans from the state of ignorance and darkness in which they had been so long buried. He assembled in his court of Bagdad learned men of every class and country, to make them translate into Arab or Syriac books on philosophy and astronomy, which he had bought from the Christians; in return, the Arabs communicated to Europe their cyphers, the sciences of Algebra and Chemistry, etc. Aaron- Al-Raschid died in the year 809, after a prosperous reign of twenty three years. The Arabian monarchy, no longer supported by his vigorous hand, gradually lost the strength which he had im- , parted to it; whereas the Greek empire, on the contrary, began to recover from the heavy losses which it had suffered under Nicophorus. This wicked emperor, during the nine years (802 — 811) that he occu- pied the throne, seemed to vie with foreign enemies in harrassing and plundering his people. The end of his reign was particularly disas- trous. Having, though absolutely destitute of talents, the highest idea of his princely abilities, he undertook against the Bulgarians an 202 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 4. expedition which he thought wouid he decisive and sufficient to avenge all previous defeats. Through his own imprudence and te- merity, just the reverse happened The Bulgarians shut him up with his numerous troops between defiles and mountains, and made such a slaughter of them, that nearly all perished, with the officerSj the generds. and the emperor himself. His head was cut oflf, by command ot King Crumnius, and the dried skull afterwards served as a cup in the solemn repasts of that fierce barbarian. After this, the conquerors poured into Thrace, a part of which they easily con- quered under the sb'^rt reigns of Stauracius and Michael Curopalates, and even advanced so far as to threaten the capital. Such was the alarmmg state of the empire until the year 813, when Leo the Armenian, a man of great military skill, ascended the throne. He had no sooner assembled an army, than he marched out against the Bulgarians, and meeting their victorious bands near Constantinople, came to a bloody engagement with them, in which he was on the point of being defeated. His troops, terrified by the multitude and fury of those barbarians, began to fly in great disorder when the emperor, perceiving that there was as much confusion on the side of the conquerors as among the fugitives, suddenly rushed against the former with a body of reserve, and stopped them by the violence of the attack. This revived the courage of his own soldiers, who then returned to the field of battle, and enabled Leo to obtain a complete victory. The next campaign (a. d. 815) was still more suc- cessful. The emperor first deceived the Bulgarians by feigning to re- lire at their approach, and when he knew from his spies that they did not suspect any danger, he entered their camp during the night, and surprising them in their sleep, put them all to the sword. Aftei this, he advanced upon their territory, and laid it waste, the more easily, as he experienced but a slight resistance from the inhabitants, who had no regular troops to oppose him. So great was their loss on this occasion, that for the space of seventy years they were unable to do, or afraid to attempt any thing against the empire. Leo spent the remainder of his reign in persecuting the defenders of images with great violence, and coliducting the affairs of the state with a rigor which often bordered on cruelty. He was murdered in the year 820 by the partisans of Michael surnamed the Stammerer, commander of the guard, who v/as then confined for rebellion, and whom this revolution raised from the prison to the throne. This was exchanging bad for worse; for Michael, besides being a cruel perse- cutor like Leo, was moreover an unskilful and profligate prince from whom nothmg good could be expected. His reign of nine years, in stead of doing any service to the empire, beheld the loss of the rich is- lands of Crete and Sicily, which were conquered by the Mussulmans. A. D. 800 — 886.] ARABIAN AND GREEK EMPIRES. 203 Under Theophilus, the son and successor of Michael, Tvar broke out again with fresh fury between the Greeks and the eastern Sara- cens, After many undecisive battles, most of which however were fatal to the Greeks, Theophilus undertook, in 840, to repair his losses by an extraordinary eflort. He set out at the head of one hundred thousand men, and, after overrunning all Syria, laid siege to Sozo- petra, the birth-place of Caliph Mutasem. The Saracen prince, not having had time to assemble his forces, wrote to the emperor, and earnestly begged him to spare the town for his sake ; but, instead of complying with the request, Theophilus took and utterly destroyed Sozopetra, put many of the inhabitants to the sword, and led the others into captivity. This conduct filled the caliph with rage and an insatiable desire of revenge. He raised an army superior in numbers to any that had, for a long time, been seen among the Saracens, and caused the name of Amorium to be engraved on the shields of all his soldiers, to signify that his object was the destruction of this city, the native place of Theophilus. In vain did the emperor supply it with a numerous garrison composed of the bravest troops and officers of his army ; in vain did they oppose so heroic a resistance, that Mutasem lost seventy thousand men in the short space of thirteen days ; the besiegers, having been informed by a traitor of the weakest part of the town, carried it by storm during the night, and reduced it to ashes, after having made a dreadful slaughter of the garrison and inhabitants. Still, thirty thousand soldiers or citizens, were preserved alive, to be led as prisoners into Persia ; but many of them perished before reach ing that country, and forty-two officers having generously resisted all the efforts of the court of Bagdad to make them exchange the Chris- tian faith for the religion of Mahomet, were put to death after seven years of confinement and sufferings. The Emperor Theophilus had died some time before (a. d. 842), of a disease the progress of which was accelerated by his grief for the loss of Amorium. He was succeeded by his son, Michael III, a worthless and wretched prince, who, after enjoying some years of prosperity under the regency of his virtuous mother Theodora, threw himself into an abyss of crimes and evils, and authorized the first separation of the Greek from the Latin Church. The chief author of that fatal schism was Photius, a man of great genius and h^arnmg, and of still greater ambition and wickedness. By his intrigues, which were supported by a vicious court, he succeeded in invading the patriarchal see of Constantinople, after he had procured the unjust expulsion of the lawful patriarch St. Ignaiius (a. d. 857). His unparalleled talent for dissimulation and imposture enabled him, likewise, to gain over to his party many of tlie principal per- 204: MODERN HISTORY. [PART 4. sonages in the Greek Church and State ; but all his cuuning failed with regard to Pope Nicolas I, in whom he found an insuperable barrier to all his wicked schemes. This great pontiff not only refused to approve of the irregular pro- ceedings of Photius, but even pronounced against him a solemn sen- tence of excommunication. Photius, who had until that time ac- knowledged without difficulty the primacy of tlie Apostolic See, resolved in his anger to separate the Church of Constantinople from that of Rome. He took the bold step in the year 866, and endea- vored to support it by every means in his power, especially by im- postures and calumnies of the most outrageous nature. This course of violence lasted, it is true, but a short time, because, in consequence of a new revolution which happened at court, Photius was expelled from the patriarchal see, and solemnly condemned by the eighth gene- ral council held in 869 at Constantinople for the reunion of the two Churches ; still, there always lurked in the breasts of the oriental bishops a leaven of jealousy and discord, which again burst forth in the eleventh century, and completed the schism. The new revolution just mentioned took place in 867, when Michael III, whilst meditating the death of Basil the Macedonian, his associate in the empire, was himself killed in a state of intoxica- tion, after a despicable reign of twenty-five years. Basil was, by unanimous consent, acknowledged sole emperor, and showed himself, notwithstanding his humble birth, more worthy of this high prefer- ment than all his predecessors within the last two centuries. Not less attentive to save the citizens from oppression than to defend the state from foreign foes, whilst he gained considerable advantages in war against the Saracens, he at the same time repressed the injus- tice of magistrates and governors wherever he could detect it, as well in the nearest as in the most distant provinces ; himself taking the greatest care to appoint to offices of trust only upright and virtuous persons, men neither to be bribed by presents nor frightened by threats, and wholly bent on the faithful discharge of their duties in favor of justice and innocence. In order to banish cupidity from all tribunals, he strictly forbade judges, as he allowed them a sufficient stipend from the state treasury, to receive any thing from either of the contending parties, under any pretence whatever. So far did he watch over the interests of poor people, when attacked before the courts of judica- ture by some rich and powerful person, that he even established a public fund to enable them to defend their cause, and support them until it should be decided. The vigilance and firmness of Basil soon restored peace, abundance and security, in every part of the slate. Complaints against gover- nors and magistrates, which were very common before, ceased so A. D. 800—998.] SPAIN, ETC. 205 completely, that the emperor, having one day gone, as usual, to re- ceive and examine the petitions which might be presented to him, did not hear of a single grievance. Fearing lest the injured persons might have been, by violence or treachery, prevented from entering the palace, he sent confidential officers to inquire into the situation of his subjects. After diligent research, all returned and assured the emperor, that they had found no one who had expressed any dissatis- faction ; this news filled Basil with extraordinary joy ; he shed tears of exultation, and gave thanks to God for so admirable a change. On another occasion, having been informed that the price of flour had become so high that poor people were almost dying with starvation, he directly caused all hin granaries to be opened, and the wheat to be sold at one-twelfth of the ordinary price. This excellent emperor died in 886, of an accident that happened to him in the chase. A strong and stately stag, rashing by him, caught his cincture, and dragged him from his horse; before assis- tance could arrive, the animal shook him so violently, that a fatal disease ensued, and in a few days brought him to the grave. He had reigned about nineteen years, during which, by constant and successful application to affairs, he infused new life into the Greek empire. His glory indeed is tarnished by the share which he took in the murder of his predecessor, by some acts of inhumanity towards pri- soners taken in battle, and a certain pride which occasionally betrayed him into wrong measures; still the great number of his illustrious and generous actions has justly ranked him among the most remarkable sovereigns of Constantinople. His descendants occupied the throne for nearly two centuries ; but none of them was equal in talent and merit to the founder of their dynasty, and the empire fell again into the state of weakness and debasement from which it had been rescued by the exertions of Basil. SPAIN DURING THE NINTH AND TENTH CENTURIES. A. D. 800—998. On the contrary, the increase of extent and power of the new king- dom formed by the Christians in Spain, been me from that epoch, peculiarly remarkable. Ever since their first endeavors, under Pela- gio and Alfonso I, to struggle against the fierce invaders of their country, they almost constantly gained new advantages; but it is chiefly to th(? ninth age that the splendor of their hcroical times ougnl to be relerred. Their noble ardor and natural bravery, continually Stimulated by obstacles, rose now to a full display of their energies^ 18 206 MODEHN HISTOEY. [PART 4. and, whilst the JNloors began to be enervated by a long possession ot wealth and a fine climate, thirst after glory united with religious zeal produced among the Christians uninterrupted wonders in point of courage and virtue. In the first rank of great and conspicuous men who flourished at that time, must be placed Kings Alfonso II and Ramirus I, both of whom conquered the Saracens in many battles, and greatly enlarged the Christian territory. Still more brilliant were the achievements of Alfonso III, surnamed the Oreat, during his long reign of about fifty years, from 862 to 912. He first employed himself in vindicating his rights to the throne against different competitors. This being accomplish e-d, he attacked, the Moors, and spreading terror among tneiii by the rapidity of his marches, so often overthrew their armies in various campaigns, that he repeatedly compelled them to sue for peace. He was obliged to desist from war for a time, in order to suppress conspiracies that had been formed against him in his own family. Alfonso quelled them all by his activity and prudence, but dishonored himself on this occasion by an act savoring more of cruelty than of justice. Having discovered that his four brothers were at the head of one of these conspiracies, besides confining them to a prison, he caused their eyes to be plucked out: a sort of punishment which, although frequently inflicted at that period on state criminals, had in itself, especially in this circumstance, something inhuman and shocking. Alfonso, being thus dehvered from all foreign and domestic ene- mies, devoted his time to the improvement of his kingdom of Asturias and Oviedo. By this means, he regained the affection of his people, but not that of his family. Whilst a new war with the Saracens was affording him an occasion of new triumphs, another conspiracy at home recalled him from the pursuit of his conquests, and, though opposed by this warlike prince, at first whh some success, it finally obliged him to resign the sovereign power in favor of his two sons (a. d. 911). Still, he requested that some troops should be left to his command, to go and attack the Moors once more before his death. Having obtained his request, he made an irruption upon their terri- tory, and returned loaded with spoils. This was the last of his ex ploits. He died in the following year, after a reign almost continually agitated both by domestic dissensions and by foreign wars. Alfonso the Great being no longer on the throne, the success of mihtary expeditions was sometimes on the side of the Christians, sometimes on that of the Saracens, and, for a long period, nearly equal on both sides. In the year 921, the former were entirely defeated at Jonquera by the Arabian monarcn Abderame til ; hut in A. D. 800—998.] SPAIN, ETC. 207 their turn, under the conduct of King Ramirus II, they gained a complete victory at Simancas, in 939; on which occasion eighty thousand Mussulmans are said to have lost their Uves. This bloody defeat, and others which followed, did not prevent Abderame from raising his kingdom to a degree of prosperity it probably had never attained before. Being a skilful politician as well as a brave general, sometimes victorious, frequently conquered, but always great, whether in peace or war, he ever knew how to improve his success and repair his losses. Notwithstanding the obstinate warfare in which he was engaged, and the great expenses he must have incurred to support his armies, he displayed at court a magnificence which would appear incredible, were it not unanimously testified by contemporary historians. His palaces, his gardens, and his various monuments were splendid. Like two of his predecessors of the same name, and even more than they, he protected the arts and sciences ; established celebrated schools, especially of medicine ; attracted to his court the ablest physicians, architects, astronomers and poets of his age and nation ; and rendered Cordova, his capital, the centre of industry and learning. If we give credit to Arabian authors, this city contained two hundred and thirteen thousand houses, eighty-five thousand stores, six hundred mosques, nine hundred public baths, seventy libraries, and seventeen large institutions for the instruction of youth. Abderame, having the reputation of a great love of justice, and possessing those moral qualities which may absolutely be found in a false religion, went through a long reign, in a manner which secured to him the esteem and confidence of his very enemies. But nothing perhaps so well proves the greatness and superiority of his mind, as the following note found among his papers after his death: " I have been caliph for fifty years, and have enjoyed all that men can possibly desire here on earth. Being desirous to know the number of the days in which, during this long space of time, my heart was truly satisfied, I found it, upon exact enumeration, to amount to fourteen only. Mortals, learn from me how to appreciate worldly grandeur and this transitory life." Abderame III died in 961, at the age of seventy-two years. The prosperous effects of his government continued to be telt under his first successors, owing chiefly to the exertions of their prime-minister, Mahomet Almanzor, whose fidelity was equal to his courage, and who always remained satisfied with an inferior rank, although he might have occupied the first with the cciiscnt of his nation. This famous warrior invaded, it is said, fifty-two times the Christian ter- ritory, and generally returned triumphant and loaded with booty. At first, he met with an invincible opponent in the person of Count 208 MODERN HISTORY. [PART^ Femando Gonzales, the chief foundei of the sovereignty of Castile, and one of the greatest men of an age which produced in Spain so many heroes. Most unfortunately for the Christians, Gonzales died in the year 979, twenty years before Almanzor. The undaunted Moor determined then, not only to repair his late defeats by new efforts and new invasions, but also to effect, if possible, the final overthrow of the Christians. Although they sometimes found him a generous conqueror, they never experienced a more formidable enemy. He ravaged their dominions, attacked their armies separately, and defeated them all, notwithstanding their courageous resistance. Of all his victories, the most splendid and glorious was that which lie gained, in the year 995, over King Bermudes II. This prince had just mustered great forces, in order to stem the destructive tor- rent: although afflicted with the gout he put himself at their head, and from his litter gave the signal for battle. The Christians, ani- mated by the presence of their sovereign, and by the consideration of their religion, their liberty and their lives, for which they were going to fight, attacked the Saracens with irresistible fury, routed them on all sides, and obliged them to flee in great disorder. Almanzor did, on that occasion, nearly the same that is related of JuHus Caesar.* Dismounting from his horse, he lay upon the ground, and cried out that he preferred to be either trodden under foot by the fugitives or slain by the conquerors, rather than outlive his glory. The sight of this great man in such imminent danger made his soldiers ashamed of abandoning him, and inspired them with fresh courage. Rallying around their general, they rushed with him against the pursuers, whom the anticipation of victory had rendered too confident; the Christians were terrified in their turn, and fled, yielding the victory to their intrepid and obstinate enemies. After this, Almanzor, with little or no difficulty, overran the whole country, and taking, ransacking or burning the cities, pursued the vanquished as far as the mountains of Asturias, which had been their first asylum nearly three hundred years before. He would have pro- bably carried his conquests still farther, had not a dreadful plague broken out among his soldiers, which destroyed a considerable part of his army and forced him to retire in great haste. When he re- turned with fresh troops, he found that the Christian princes of the different parts of Spain had now united their forces against the com- mon enemy. They stopped his victorious march at Medina Csuli, or Calacanasor, in Castile (a. d. 998). The battle, upon which such great interests depended, was begun with equal animosity on both sides, and lasted the Avhole day. Tiie following morning, the Chris * In the battJe of Munda (Spain), against the sons of Pompey (b c. 45) A. D. 800—1016.] ENGLAND, ETC. 209 tians prepared to recommence the attack, but soon perceived that th« Moors had retreated; Almanzor, frightened at the greatness of his loss, which amounted to one hundred thousand men, dismissed his surviving soldiers, fled in despair to Medina, and there put an end to his hfe by starvation. With Mahomet Almanzor fell the splendor of the Arabian empire m Spain. His death was soon followed by a series of feuds and civil wars among the Arabs, which distracted their monarchy, and dismembered it into eigbt or nine petty kingdoms. This permitted the Christians, not only to recover entirely from their recent losses, but even to found and solidly establish four kingdoms in the north of the peninsula, viz., Leon including the more ancient kingdom of Asturias and Oviedo, Navarre, Arragon and Castile. These two, though the last in order of time, soon became the most powerful of the four, and afterwards formed by their reunion the present king- dom of Spain. ENGLAND DURING THE NINTH AND TENTH CENTUKIES. A. D. 800—1016. Among the states of modern Europe, none experienced during the middle ages more vicissitudes and revolutions than England. Its con- quest by the Anglo-Saxons, and the establishment of the Heptarchy, have been already mentioned. As long as any district remained in the island, that might be easily subdued, the Saxon kings lived together in harmony, each one being content with his dominions, or extend- ing them only at the expense of their common foes. Afterwards, they turned their arms against one another, and, by mutually weak- ening themselves, gave occasion to the ruin of the Heptarchy. Egbert, the apparent heir to the crown of Wcssex, had been first compelled by a strong party to leave the shores of England, and to take refuge at the court of Charlemagne. He served three years in the armies of that emperor, and spent the period of his exile in ac- quiring a proficiency in the science of war. and of government. Charles spared no pams in improving the noble and promising quali- ties of the British prince, and in every important transaction wished to have him near his person. He had taken him along in his last journey to Rome, when Egbert was informed of the death of his competitor, and of other favorable circumstances, which recalled him to his native country. The royal exile lost no time, but, taking leave of the French mo- narch, who loaded him with marks of aflection and esteem, lie 18* 210 MODERN HISTORY. [PABT.4r. returned to England, where his claim was unanimously acknow ledged by the West-Saxon lords. Being crowned, with universal ap- plause, king of Wessex in the year 801, he devoted the commence- ment of his reign to the cultivation of peace; but, from the time when he first unsheathed the sword against the Britons of Wales, each succeeding year was marked by new victories and conquests. The Britons were subdued ; then the feeble kingdoms of Essex, Kent, and others shared the same fate ; and before 830, Egbert had extended his authority over the greater part of the island. Scarcely however had he attained this superiority among the na- tive princes, when he saw himself attacked by a foreign and most dangerous enemy. At this period, Denmark was the birth-place of a race of men who spent the best portion of their lives on the sea, either because they were compelled to leave their country which v/as too thickly inhabited, or because they preferred the fruits of ra- pine to those of industry. Whilst the Normans, their countrymen, laid waste the coasts of France and Spain, the Danes directed their attempts against the British isles. Their first descents, it is true, had no great eflTect, and produced temporary alarm, rather than perma- nent uneasiness ; but towards the close of the reign of Egbert, the numbers of the pirates perpetually increased, and their visits being annually renewed, took a much more alarming aspect. In 833, Eg- bert himself had the mortification to see his West-Saxons defeated by the mvaders. Convinced of the necessity of adopting stronger mea- sures, he summoned all his vassals around hi in, and waited in anxious suspense for the next descent of the enemy : success crowned his ef- forts, and a decisive though bloody victory compelled the Danes to take refuge in their ships. This was the last exploit of Egbert, who died in the following year (a. d. 836), after a prosperous reign oi about thirty-five years. His death, and the pacific disposition of his son Ethelwulf, em- boldened the barbarians to renew their invasions. Redoubled exer- tions were made, on the one side for the attack, and on the other for the defence, with a continual alternation of success and misfortune At last, a general battle was fought at Okeley (a. d. 851), in which the Danes were so completely overthrown, that their loss is said to have been greater than they had ever sustained in any age or country. They appeared to be disheartened by so severe a defeat, and respected, for a time, the shores of England. But their loss seemed only to urge them to make more extensive preparations for subsequent at- tacks. AAer the death of Ethelwulf, and under his four sons, Ethel' bald, Ethelbert, Ethelred and Alfred, all of whom reigned succes- Bively, those undaunted pirates renewed their efforts and inroads with I'resh and incessant fury. In spite of many severe losses which they A. D. 800—1016.] ENGLAND, ETC. 211 again sufTered, they returned to the charge so often and so repeatedly, as finally to take possession, in a few years, of a great part of the island. Such was the state of Great Britain, when Alfred, the last of the four brothers just mentioned, ascended the throne in 871. No reign ever commenced with more unfavorable auspices. The Saxon prince had scarcely any troops to oppose the invaders, and saw himself corn pelled to enter into a treaty with them, by which he was left in pos- session of Wessex and a few other districts, whilst they kept the bet- ter part of the country for themselves. Nor even did this arrange- ment last long. Repeated attacks of the Danes forced Alfred to abandon for a time the whole of his dominions to their rapacity, and retire into a small island situated in a morass between two rivers. Here he submitted to his humble lot with piety and resignation, in hope of better times. Being one day buried in deep reflection on his misfortunes, he happened to let some cakes burn, which the wife of the herdsman with whom he lodged, had committed to his care. She reproached him severely, telling him he was more ready to eat than to earn his bread. On another occasion, the pious king did not hesi- tate to give one-half of the only loaf that remained in the place, to a poor and needy traveller : a truly charitable action, which the provi- dence of God shortly afterwards rewarded by the arrival of a large supply of provisions. In the meantime, the Danes spread terror throughout the Avhole country, which they plundered and laid waste, with almost no resistance. However, one of their parties was entirely defeated in 878, by the earl of Devonshire, who killed their general Ubbo with twelve hundred of his followers. This revived the courage of the Saxons, and Alfred having now quitted his retreat, a multitude of brave warriors flocked to his standard, ready to shed their blood for his defence and the independence of the realm. The king imme- diately marched out with them against the main body of the Danes, who, on their side, advanced with hasty steps to meet him on the field of batde. As the armies approached, they uttered shouts of mutual defiance, and, after the first discharge of their missile weapons, came to a close and sanguinary engagement. The animosity of the two nations, the efforts of their leaders, the fluctuations of victory, can be more easily imagined than expressed. The Dane:? displayed a valor worthy of their former renown; the Saxons were stimulated by honor, shame, and every motive that can influence the heart of man. At length, ♦heir intrepidity bore down all opposition; the Northmen, after suf- fering a tremendous slaughter, fled to their camp, where being pur- sued and closely surrounded, they consented to capitulaie. The 212 MODERN HISTORY. [PART. 4. terms imposed on ihem by the conqueror were, that they should either leave the island, or embrace the laws of Christianity ; and if they became Christians, that they should quit the kingdom of Wes sex, and confine themselves to their former settlements in other parts of England. All this appears to have been at the time faithfully executed. Alfred being now in a state of comparative tranquillity, set him- self about repairing the damages occasioned by war, and providing against future disasters. The army, fortifications and navy claimed his first care. Bodies of regular troops were organized for the de- fence of his kingdom, especially along the coast; castles were built in places the best fitted to prevent the landing, or to impede the pro- gress of an enemy ; and a considerable fleet was equipped, which, within a few years, obtained numerous triumphs over the pirates: so that Alfred may be regarded as the real founder of the naval and military glory of Great Britain. He next turned his attention to the improvement and civilization of his people. In order to check the spirit of disorder and anarchy which, during the long period of barbarian invasion, had become prevalent throughout the realm, the king restored and enlarged the salutary institutions of his predecessors, and from ancient statutes, composed a code of law adapted to the present circumstances. But, as legislative enactments are of little avail, unless well observed in the community, he insured their execution by his constant vigilance" and firmness. Particularly attentive to the proceedings of the courts of judicature, he frequently revised them himself, and receiving the appeals of all injured persons, inflicted severe though proportionate penalties on all ignorant or iniquitous judges. This severity pro- duced the most beneficial result ; magistrates were taught to become more learned and more conscientious ; whilst murder, theft and other crimes, being sure to meet with due punishment, were rendered as rare as they had been common before. So exact was the observance of the laws, that, according to the unanimous assertion of English historians, if a traveller lost his purse on the road, he would the next day find it untouched; and some relate besides, that golden bracelets having been suspended on the high road, nobody ventured to steal so valuable an object. Alfred was also the restorer of literature and learning, which had considerably suffered during the late wars. With the assistance of distinguished scholars of his own and foreign countries, whom he invited to his court, he not only founded the university of Oxford, but likewise opened schools in many other places for the instruction of his subjects. He himself gave to all the example of application to study, in whicli he succeeded so well, that several good works were either A. D. 800—1016.] ENGLAND, ETC. 213 composed, or translated by him from the Latin into the Saxon tongue. Nor were these the only services that Alfred rendered to his people. He also encouraged agriculture, commerce, and all necessary and use- ful arts; applying himself above all to restore the salutary influence of religion, and to revive piety around him both by word and exam- ple. In fact, the domestic life of this admirable prince was as well regulated as his public conduct, and a proper management of his time enabled him perfectly to fulfil all his duties. Each day, he gave eight hours to the care of his kingdom, eight to study and works of piety or charity, and the other eight to sleep and necessary recreation. As the use of watches and clocks as we have them at present, was not yet known, he employed, for the division of the day, six wax candles, each one of which burnt during four hours, and his chaplains informed him when it was extinguished. After many years of peace, Alfred was attacked by those same Normans, who had so long and so often desolated the coasts of France. He opposed them with superior ability, defeated them by land and sea, and, more successful than the French kings, dehvered his kingdom from those adventurers. Shortly after, he died, full of glory and all sorts of merits (a. d. 900), having lived fifty-one, and reigned twenty-nine years. With the name of Alfred posterity has associated the epithet of Great; which indeed few princes have equally deserved for courage in danger and wisdom in government. Whilst many other kings of England are chiefly known in history by their actions in the field of battle,- it is the praise of Alfred, that he was not merely a warrior, but also the patron of learning and the legislator of his people. The celebrated Henry Spelraan, filled with a sort of enthusiasm at the recollection of this illustrious king, speaks of him thus : '^ O Alfred, the wonder and prodigy of all ages ! If we reflect on his piety, we will be inclined to beheve that he always lived in retirement and soli- tude; if we recollect his warhke exploits, we will judge that he never departed from the camps; if we call to mind his learning and wri- tings, we will imagine that he spent his whole life in a literary insti- tution ; if we direct our attention to his wise administration and wholesome laws, it will seem that these had been his only study and employment." * Alfred was succeeded on the throne by his son Edward. In legis- lation and literary merit, Edward was much inferior to his fatherj but he surpassed iiim in the magnitude of his conquests. During the whole of liis reign (900 — 924), there were but few intervals free * See, on the reign and qualifications of Alfred, besides civil historiang, a very learned, extensive antl interesting note of Alban Butler, in liis Liy<3s of ihe Saints, under the 2Sth of October, 214 MODEKN HISTOEY. [PART 4. from war against the Danes. He gained many victories over thera, and, by the subjugation of various provinces, acquired more real power than had ever been possessed by his predecessors. All the tribes from Northumbria to the channel owned his sway ; the kings of the Scots and the princes of Wales acknowledged him as their lord, or paid him tribute ; and the other nations in the island eagerly solicited his friendship. Athelstan, Edward's eldest son and successor (924 — ^940), pursued the same line of policy. By his unceasing efforts, the influence of the British and Danish chieftains disappeared in England during the remainder of his reign. All the provinces originally subdued and colonized by the different Saxon tribes, became united under the same crown; and the celebrated battle of Brunanburg in Northumbria (a. d. 937), confirmed the ascendency of Athelstan. He thus completed the work commenced by his forefathers, and to him chiefly belongs the glory of having established what has ever since been called the Kingdom of England. This happy state of Great Britain was however soon disturbed by new storms, more furious and lasting than had ever been experienced before. After a few short reigns, the most remarkable of which was that of Edgar, and after the death of King Edward the Martyr, in 978, the Danes reappeared with fresh forces, and resumed their for- mer course of invasion. So furious indeed, and so persevering were their inroads and ravages, that for many years, viz. from 980 to 1016, England presented nothing but almost uninterrupted scenes of devastation, plunder, bloodshed and ail kinds of misery. FRANCE AND GERMANY IN THE TENTH AND ELEVENTH CENTURIES.— A. D. 912—1024. Such had been also, for a long time the case with France, the con- quest of which was the ambition of the terrible Normans. Although repelled with great loss from the walls of Paris in 886, they persevered in their course of piracy, under the conduct of Rollo, one of the greatest warriors of that iron-age. At length. King Charles the Sim- ple consented to give up to them, on the condition of vassalage, the north of France, which thus became their permanent property about the year 912, and took from them the name of Normandy. This cession proved indeed most beneficial to the kingdom, and to the Normans themselves, who, whhout reno'mcing their warlike spirit, abandoned their predatory habits, and adopted those of a civilized and Christian life; but it did not stop the decline nor prevent the downfall of the dynasty of Charlemagne. The same year, 912, be A. D. 912—1024.] FRANCE AND GERMANY. 215 held the imperial sceptre pass from his family into the hands of the German lords, whilst his successors on the French throne, for want either of talent and firmness, or of sufficient authority, were little re- spected in their own dominions and residence. The kingdom was shamefully parcelled out, as it were, between themselves and the great vassals of the crown, who, being frequently more powerfu than the sovereign, became mere nominal subjects, and, refused to obey his orders when they appeared to conflict with their supposed interest or their caprice; whereas they freely waged war against one another, with the help of their own respective subjects.* Such was the wretched condition of France and of its sovereigns during the tenth century. In fine, after the demise of Louis V, who died without issue, the French lords refused to acknowledge as his successor, his uncle Charles, duke of Lorraine, who had lately sub- mitted himself in the quality of a vassal, to the German emperor. They offered the sceptre to Hugh-Capet, duke of France, as being the most worthy of it for his royal qualities and the great power he already enjoyed (a. d. 987). In vain did Charles, at the head of an army, attempt to maintain his claims to the throne; Hugh, having popular favor on his side, baffled all his measures and remained in possession of the sovereign power. His reign lasted nine years, the greater part of which he spent in keeping his vassals and subjects within the bounds of respect and duty, as well by his prudence and moderation, as by multiplied vic- tories. His wisdom still more appeared in his successful efforts to establish a regular mode of succession to the throne : instead of divi- ding tlie kingdom among his sons, as had been so often and so impru- dently done before, he, with the consent of the nation, ordered that Robert, the eldest, should be his only successor. The like was done after him at every new accession, and this practice became one of the fundamental laws of the French monarchy. The case was just the reverse in Germany. Ever since the empire was transferred f^rom the French to the German princes, from here- ditary it had become elective. The sceptre was first offered to Otho, duke of Saxony, who thought proper, on account of his advanced age, to decline the honor, and recommended Conrad, duke of Fran- conia, though his personal enemy, to the choice of the electors.f * The great vassals were six in number, viz. the three dukes of Bur- pindy, Normandy and France properly so called ; and the three eails of Flanders, ChampaJOTe and Toulouse. t The number of the electors did not continue always the same. By tho Emperor Charles IV, in 1.356, it was reduced to seven, viz., the arch- bishops of Mentz, Triers and Cologne ; the king of Bohemia, the duke of Saxony, the count Palatin, and the marquis of Brandebtarg : to whom were subsequently added the dukes of Hanover and Bavaria. 216 MODERN" HISTORY. [PART 4. Conrad therefore was appointed, and reigned seven years (912 — 919). When he found himself drawing near the end of his life, he, with equal generosity, proposed for his successor, Henry, the son of Otho, as herns the hest fitted to rule the state in those turbulent times. Henry, surnamed the Fowler, on account of his fondness fbr hunt- ing, was in truth well qualified to wear a crown, and fully answered public expectation. He delivered Germany from the ravages of the surrounding tribes, especially those of the Hungarians, a fierce and warhke people of Scythian descent, whose only delight was in pillage and destruction. The emperor succeeded in uniting all the German forces against them, and the eflfect of this reunion was the entire de- feat of the Hungarians in two great battles fought near Mersburg (a. d. 920 and 934), in one of which they lost eighty thousand, and m the other forty thousand men. Henry was endeavoring at the same time to promote, by every means in his power, the safety and happiness of his people. He organized a militia, inured the nobility to the hardships of war, for- tified the towns, rescued the country from banditti and robbers, and took proper measures to extend the wholesome influence of religion throughout all his dominions. The wisdom of his laws against vice dnd disorder was not less conspicuous than the multitude of his ex ploits against foreign enemies. This great prince died in 936, having lived sixty and reigned seventeen years. Otho I, his eldest son, was chosen to succeed him in the empire, not however without much opposition and many obstacles, all of which he overcame by his prudence, firmness and activity. He was equally successful in different wars agamst the Bohemians, the Hun- garians, and the Italian princes. His reign lasted thirty-seven years, during which he gave such proofs of unparalleled magnificence, generosity, valor, wisdom, religion and justice, as to deserve, not- withstanding some failings in the exercise of his power, the praises of impartial posterity. After him the German throne was successively occupied, from 973 to 1002, by his son and grand-son, both of the same name; and from 1002 to 1024, by their relative Henry II, or St. Henry, under whom Germany again enjoyed all the advantages that can be expected from a good, wise and virtuous sovereign. Some years before he died, he had wished to renounce all earthly grandeur, and, applying to Rich- ard, abbot of St. Vannes in Lorraine, begged admittance into the monastery. The holy abbot, not to afflict him by a stern denial, received his vow of obedience, but immediately commanded him, in virtue of it, to reassume the government of the empire, for the honor of God and the good of his people; to which the pious monarch humbly, though reluctantly, submitted. As he left no children, .he A. D. 960 — 1040.] EASTERN NATIONS. 217 imperial sceptre passed a second time into the hands of the Fran- conian dukes, and, after a few reigns, devolved on the princes of the bouse of Suabia. £ASTEIIN NATIONS IN THE TENTH AND ELEVENTH CEN- TURIES.— a. D. 960—1040. In he meantime, the Greek empire had shone with great splen- dor under three successive emperors, Nicephorus Phocas, John Ziniisces and Basil II, the first of whom began to reign in 963. He was born of an illustrious family in Constantinople, and from his youth distinguished himself in the army. Having become a general, he succeeded, by his persevering efforts and vigilance united with valor, in expelling the Saracens from the important island of Crete, of which they had been masters one hundred and thirty-five years (a. d. 960). The troops, to whom he was much endeared, raised him to the throne, after the death of Romanus II. He then extended his projects, and, attacking the Saracens of Asia with unrelenting vigor, wrested from them many towns and several provinces, which he reunited to the empire. To these splendid achievements, the zeal of Nicephorus for mili- tary discipline contributed as much as his personal bravery. He kept his soldiers within the strict bounds of duty by the most effica- cious of all means, that of example : claiming for himself no special exemption, he easily induced others to become equally patient and courageous. Unfortunately, so great a warrior, the terror of all the ene- mies around, was also, by his avarice and exactions, the terror of his own subjects. Augmenting the taxes, and altering the coins, he seemed obstinately resolved to make all the riches of the nation pass into his coffers. Hence it happened that many officers, even among those who had been most sincerely attached to him, being now exasperated by his injustice and tyranny, secretly conspired against his life. John Zimisces, their leader, and five others, were introduced during the night in a basket, and through a window, into the apartment in which Nicephorus was asleep. He awoke just to see the daggers directed against his breast. The conspirators dragged him from his couch, and stabbed him at the feet of Zimisces, whom they proclaimed em- peior in his place (a. d. 969). If heroic fortitude and courage, if the habitual practice of mild- ness, justice, generosity, in a word, of all public and private virtues, ever could obliterate a crime, this lenity should be extended to Zimis- ces, a prince undoubtedly one of the greatest among the successors of Constantine. The Greek historians seem to vie with each other in 19 213 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 4. bestowing upon him the highest encomiums, and even the annals of northern nations have praised this illustrious emperor, who stopped their warlike and victorious hordes. For, it was at this juncture thai a formidable army of Rossi or Russians, having, under the conduct of their duke Wenceslas, crossed the Danube, made an irruptioL into Bulgaria and Thrace, which they ravaged as far as Adrianopie. A t first, Zimisces sent his ablest generals against them ; arierwan Is^ inarching in person, he expelled the invaders from the towns and fortresses which they had taken, and driving all their detachments before him, at length forced them to a general engagement, near the city of Dorostolis, on the banks of the Danube. The multitude and natural bravery of the Russians on the one side, and the valor and skill of the imperial legions on the other, ren- dered this battle one of the most obstinate and terrible in the annals of war. So great was the animosity of the combatants, that the ad- vantage is said to have successively passed from one army to the other no fewer than twelve times. The contest thus raged with un- abated fury from morning until late in the evening, when the Rus- sians began to waver, and Zimisces, redoubling his efforts, gained at last a complete victory. Three or four more battles, fought within a sliort time, saw him equally victorious, and almost destroyed the Rus- sian forces. Being now deprived of all resource, the remains of thei? army came to the determination of abandoning all their designs of con- quest, and of retracing their steps to their own country. But, whilsv they were retreating, another barbarous tribe surprised them in an am- buscade, and mercilessly put them all to the sword (a. d. 971). Zimisces, on the contrary, returned in triumph to Constantinople, where he was received with extraordinary joy and magnificence. Shortly after, he marched against the eastern Saracens, who had availed themselves of his absence, to reconquer many places in Asia. The arrival of Zimisces once more changed the state of affairs: wherever he appeared, towns and fortresses were either compelled by force or induced by promises to surrender. When he returned from this glorious expedition, as he was passing through a tract of land extremely rich, beautiful, and adorned with palaces, he was told that all these belonged to his minister Basil. *' Behold," he exclaimed, '*it is then to enrich one man, that the state is exhausted, that the ar- Diies undergo so many hardships ; that soldiers, officers, emperors, expose their lives and shed their blood in battles!" These words were, by perfidious friends, related to the minister, who, fearing an inquiry into his administration, determined to avoid, by the commis- sion of an atrocious crime, the disgrace with which he was threatened, ;and bribed the cup-bearer of the emperor to poison this excellent prince. The fatal draught being tendered and taken, Zimisces felt A. D. 960 1040.] EASTERN NATIONS. 219 an inward fire, which soon manifested itself outwardly by carbun- cles and vomitinj^ of blood. However, the sight of approaching death did not terrify his great soul ; be spent his last days in pre- paring, by confession and other religious exercises, to appear before the tribunal of God, and, after forbidding inquiries to be made about the author of his death, terminated, with the sentiments of an humble penitent, a career which, with the exception of one day, had been that of a Christian hero (a. d. 975). After him, the throne was filled by two brothers and descendants of Basil the Macedonian, Basil II and Constantino VIII. They reigned together, and equally enjoyed the honors of the purple ; but the exercise of the supreme authority was left entirely to Basil, ■who far surpassed his brother in genius, ability, and application to public affairs. He skilfully extricated himself from various rebel- lions and civil wars excited in the beginning of his reign by some discontented generals. He then directed all his energies against the Bulgarians, who had been so long a match for the empire. Their courageous resistance protracted the war probably much longer than had been anticipated, and a series of continual attacks and bloody engagements was hardly sufficient to subdue that na- tion and its leaders, who defended themselves with truly heroic fortitude; but so obstinately, and, it may be said, so cruelly bent was Basil on the entire reduction of Bulgaria, that it finally passed under his sway, with all the treasures which the Bulgarians had amassed during three hundred years, by war and pillage. In the East also, Basil extended considerably the boundaries >)£ the empire. Even age could not extinguish his martial spirit ; and he was actually preparing for an expedition against the Saracens of Sicily, when a violent fever carried him ofT in the sixty-eighth year of his life, and the fifty-first of his reign (a. d. 1025). This long in- terval had indeed been illustrated by many successful wars and by a firm administration; but unfortunately, Basil II did not know how to win the afTection and esteem of his subjects. Whilst his armies were every where victorious, the people were groaning under heavy taxes, and religion and humanity often condemned the actions of the monarch. The fifty years immediately following his decease beheld the rapid succession of fifteen emperors, most of them unworthy of notice. In the meantime, the vast monarchy foux.ded by the Arabs had been going to decay. The indolence of the caliph of Bagdad en- couraged the ambition of the diflferent governors of provinces to withdraw their allegiance from him, and to proclaim their indepen dence. In this manner were Africa and Persia gradually severed from the sway of the Abassides. Towards the end of the tenth century, 220 MOPERISr HISTORY. [PART 4. they lost also Palestine and Egypt, where the Falimiles (real or pre- tended descendants of Fatima, a daughter of Mahomet) established their domination, under the venerated title of caHphs (a. d. 972). Against these and other invaders, the caliphs of Bagdad called to their assistance some of the Turkish tribes stationed in the neighbor- nood of the Caspian sea; tribes famous for their exploits under their leader Seldjuk. At first, the caliphs had reason to applaud them- selves for this measure. Those warlike tribes fought with great valor and success against the enemies of the reigning dynasty, and re-established its authority in several provinces; but, towards the year 1040, they began to make conquests for themselves. Animated by the favorable result of their first attempts, they spread their wander- ing hordes over Mesopotamia, Syria, Palestine and Asia Minor, and^ defeating the Greek emperor Romanus Diogenes in a great battle, took possession of those rich countries, which formed the renowned though short-Hved empire of the Seljukian Turks. In a few years, Iconium, Jerusalem, Antioch, Tarsus and Nicea were subdued by them, and remained in their power until the time of the Crusades. [RELAND, PARTICULARLY DURING THE TENTH AND ELEVENTH CENTURIES,— a. d. 965—1014. Returning to the history of western Europe, we shall here speak exclusively of Ireland, and by retracing for a moment our steps to more remote ages, we will place together before the eyes of our readers, the chief events which then distinguished this interesting portion of the world. The origin of the Irish as a distinct nation is generally referred to a very high antiquity. During a long lapse of centuries, both before and after the coming of Christ, they were governed by kings, one of whom, called the king of Tara, was considered as the supreme ruler of the island. The subordinate princes who reigned in the four great provinces of Ulster, Leinster, Munster and Connaught, were obliged to pay a tribute to that monarch, as a sign of inferiority ; but, in seve- ral cases, they endeavored to render it a merely nominal subjection, whilst, in other respects, they were by right absolutely independent in their own respective kingdoms. Thus the government was really pentarchical; a government which, though possessing several advan tages, was calculated to create and foster a spirit of disunion, as ex- perience too often fatally showed in the course of ages. In the fifth century after the coming of our Lord, Ireland was con- verted to Christianity by the great St. Patrick. This truly apostolic A. D. 965— lOU.] IRELAND. 221 man had the satisfaction of baptizing an incredible multitude of pagans, who hastened, at his call, lo exchange their heathenish superstitions for the pure precepts of the Gospel. *' While, in other countries," says Moore, '* the introduction of Christianity has been the slow work of time ... in Ireland, on the contrary by the influence of one hum ble but zealou."] missionary, and ^^^'vh but little previous preparatipa of the soil by other hands, Christia".ify burst forth at the first ray of apostolic lifbt, and, Vv'iih the sudden ripeness of a northern summer, at once covered the whole land."* Churches arose everywhere; schools and monasteries were founded, in which science and exalted virtue continued long to flourish. Such was indeed the renown of freland for sanctity and leavning, that, by common consent, she received the glorious title of '*the island of saints;" foreigners flocked to her shores to be instructed in religion and letters, and a residence in Ire- land was considered as almost essential to establish a literary character. Not content with aflbrding an asylum to those strangers at home, the sons of Hibernia crossed the seas to difl'use the same blessings abroad; all the neighboring nations, England, France, Germany and Switz- erland, profited by the zeal and learning of Irish missionaries, and die most celebrated nurseries of science in those remote ages were founded or improved by Irish scholars. At the close of the eighth century, Ireland began to be infested by the Danes, those terrible Northmen, who, for above two hundred years, proved so formidable to several nations of Europe. Here, as elsewhere, ruin and desolation marked the progress of these invaders: the country was ravaged; churches, monasteries and universities were plundered and destroyed. From time to time, it is true, the Danes were boldly attacked and defeated ; but fresh swarms succeeded, and committed new outrages and depredations throughout the island. Thus fortune was alternately propitious, till the reign of Brian Boru, who came to the throne of Munster in 965. This gallant hero soon compelled the enemies of his country to flee before him. In 970, he attacked Limerick, of which they had become masters, drove them from this post, and pursuing his advantage, gained over them from twenty-five to thirty pitched battles. Success so brilliant and uninterrupted, united with truly royal quuUties, prudence, valor, magnanimhy and patriotism, elevated the king of Munster to the higher station of monarch of Tara. Some years after his elevation, he was again summoned to the field by a new and formidable attack of the Danes. Regardless of his advanced age, he resolutely marched at the head of thirty thousand warriors .gainst his undaunted foes, and attacked them in the plains of Clon- * History of Ireland, p. 110. 19* 222 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 4. /arf, on the 23(1 of April (a. d. 1014) The battle lasted from eight in the morning till four in the afternoon, with a display of almost superhuman courage on both sides. It raged most fiercely around the chiefs of either party, numbers of whom perished in this memo- rable action, among others, Brian's heroic son, Morrough, who, during the whole conflict, had performed prodigies of valor; Brian himself was slain in his tent after the battle, by a fugitive Dane Notwithstanding these losses of the Irish, their victory was complete, and the Danes were driven from the field with immense slaughter. The battle of Clontarf gave the deathblow to the power of the Northmen in Ireland. Of the survivors, some bade an eternal fare- well to the country; othfjrs submitted to the government which they had in vain endeavored to subvert, and the remainder, few in number, minghng with the mass of the population, gradually disappeared as a distinct people. Thus was Ireland, through her own persevering efforts, entirely freed from those terrible and obstinate invaders; an event so much the more glorious, as this very period witnessed their success in England, of which they made themselves masters, and over which, during three successive reigns, they ruled with absolute sway. DANISH KINGS IN ENGLAND— SAXON LINE RESTORED A. D. 1016—1066. The bloody struggle of the Anglo-Saxons against the Danes, theii obstinaie enemies, had now lasted two hundred years, when Edmund, surnamed Ironside (from his great bodily strength), came to the throne of England in 1016. This prince beemed destined to restore the independence of his country, having, within the short space of six months, fought no fewer than five baitles, and gained nearly as many victories over the Danish King Canute. But having been, through the perfidy or cowardice of a certain Count Edric, entirely defeated in the fifth battle, the noblemen of both parties, equally tired oi this sanguinary warfare, obliged their sovereigns to come to a com- promise, and divide the kingdom among themselves. Edmund died witnin a month after this treaty of pacification, and left Canute in possession of all England. The Saxons had no reason to repent for submitting to this foreign prince. No sooner did Canute see himself secure on the throne, than he became, from a turbulent warrior, a just and beneficen* monarch. He often lamented the bloodshed and misery which the Danish war had inflicted on the natives, and considered it his bounden A. D. 1016—1066.] DANISH KINGS IN ENGLAND. 223 duty to compensate their sufferings by a mild and equitable adminis- tration. He always treated them with kindness, and, placing the two nations on a looting of equality, admitted them alike to offices of trust and emolument. By this means, he won the affection of all, even of his English subjects; whilst he also gained their admiration and esteem by his Christian virtues and sincere piety, of which he gave a striking proof on the following occasion : Bf^ing one day near the sea-shore, his courtiers, to flatter him, said that he was the king of kings, the master of both earth and sea, Canute took this opportunity to show how much he despised theii foolish flattery. Sitting down, and addressing himself to the tide which was advancing: "I am thy master," he exclaimed; "mine also is the earth : I command thee, therefore, to stay where thou art, and not to move farther and wet my feet." All present thought the king mad, to imagine that the sea was going to obey his orders : it continued to advance, and at length came to the feet of the monarch. Turning to his flatterers, he said: ** You see how far I am from being the master of all things. Learn hence that the power of kings is very inconsiderable. There is indeed no other king than Almighty God, by whom alone the heavens, the earth and the sea are governed." He rose at these words, went to the church of Win- chester, and taking the crown from his head, placed it on the greaJ crucifix in the cathedral, and never more wore it even at public ceremonies. Canute was king not only o^ England, but of Denmark also, and moreover acquired and exercised a sort of of jurisdiction over the Norwegians, the Swedes, the Welsh and the Scots. This vast extent of dominion rendered him one of the mightiest monarchs in Europe, whilst his truly royal qualities gained him universal respect from fo- reign princes. He died after a glorious reign of eighteen yeara (a. d. 1035). His kingdoms were divided among his three sons, two of whom successively reigned in England, namely, Harold and Har- dicanute. After their death, the English having determined to restore the Saxon line of their monarchs, Edward, a brother to Edmund Ironside, was recalled from Normandy where he had spent many years in exile, and with general applause, ascended the throne of his fathers (a. d. 1040). If we estimate, as D. Lingard observes, the character of a sove reign by the test of popular affection, we must rank Edward among the best of princes. Whilst ahve, the goodness of his heart, which he had improved in the time of banishment, was adored by his sub- jects; and, after death, his memory was bequeathed as an object ol veneration to posterity. The blessings of his reign are the constani theme of ancient English writers; not that he displayed any of those 224 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 4. brilliant qualities which attracl the admiration of the world, while they inflict misery on the human race: but he exhibited the interest- mg spectacle of a king negligent of his private interests, and totally devoted to the welfare of his people. To ward off foreign agression and restore the dominion of laws, to preserve peace and promote religion, were the constant objects of his solicitude. He was pious, kind and compassionate, the protector of the weak, and the father of the poor, more willing to give than to receive j more inclined to pardon than to punish, and better pleased to bestow his own revenues in acts of charity, than profit by the labors of his subjects. Edward pubhshed a new compilation of the statutes of his Saxon predecessors, among which those favorable to the people held the first rank. Hence they were ever since called the lawn and custotns of the good king Edward. This truly good and excellent monarch died m the beginning of the year 1066, and was canonized, about a cen- tury after, by Pope Alexander III. NORMANS IN ENGLAND.— WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR. A. D. 1066— 10S7. By the death of King Edward, England was replunged into the miseries of war. As he had died without issue, the British sceptre was claimed by several competitors, among whom Harold, the chief of the English nobility, and William, duke of Normandy, were the most powerful. Setting aside the question which of the two was more entitled to the throne, both of them were worthy of it by their uncommon qualifications of body and mind, and, what was very sin- gular, each one claimed it in virtue of the late king's will and ap- pointment. Whilst William prepared to prosecute, by arms, his claims or his pretensions, Harold, being already present in the kingdom, was the first proclaimed and acknowledged as its sovereign. But he had the misfortune to be opposed at the same time, not only by a foreign rival, but also by his own brother Tostig, in whom he experienced, for having been accessary to his exile during the preceding reign, a bitter and deadly enemy. Tostig visited Normandy, and arranged a plan of co-operation with the duke : having moreover sent deputies to the northern princes, he succeeded in obtaining the assistance of Hardrada, king of Norway. A gallant army in a fleet of three hun- dred sail, unexpectedly appeared, landed without opposition, and sub- dued the province of Northumberland with York its capital. Harold, who was at that time awaiting the threatened descent of the duke of A. D. 1066 — 1087.] NORMANS IN ENGLAND, ETC. 225 Normandy, lost no time in marchmg against the Norwegians. He overtook them at Siamford Bridge, and completely defeated them in a bloody battle, in which both his perfidious brother and the Norwe- gian moHarch were slain. The remnant of the vanquished were compelled to re-embark. Almost simultaneously with this great victory, intelligence arrived that the Normans had just landed on the coast of Sussex. William, having at length completed his vast preparations for the invasion of England, crossed the channel with a fleet of at least nine hundred vessels, which carried an army still more formidable for the valor than for the number of the combatants. The duke set them an ex- ample of wonderful daring. At the very moment of the landing of hia troops, happening to fall on the shore, and being afraid lest this should appear to weak minds a bad omen for the success of his enterprise, he cried out with admirable presence of mind : " I • take possession of England; it belongs to me; I lay hold of it with both hands." At the receipt of the fatal news, Harold mustered his forces, and led them straight forward against the enemy. He had defeated the Norwegians on the 25lh of September; on the 14th of the fol- lowing month, he arrived in sight of the Normans, at a place called Senlac, nine miles from Hastings. The next day boih armies prepared for battle. Harold posted his troops on the declivity of a hill in one compact body; WiUiam mar- shalled his host on the opposite eminence, and arranged with par- ticular care the squadrons of his numerous cavalry, on which he principally rested his hope of success. After the usual discharge of arrows, the Norman knights fiercely advanced against their motion- less opponents. The shock was dreadful; but the English at every point opposed a vigorous and successful resistance, and their battle axe was so powerfully wielded, that the aggressors could not prevent their left wing from being thrown into confusion. Even a report was spread that William himself had fallen ; and the whole army was be- ginning to waver, when the duke, riding along the line, exclaimed: *'I am still alive, and, with the help of God, I shall gain the victory." This revived the courage of the Normans, and those among the English who had incautiously pursued the left wing too far, were in- tercepted and cut to pieces. The combat having now recommenced with fresh animosity, Wil- liam had recourse to a stratagem suggested to his mind by his pre- vious success: he ordered a division of his cavalry to feign flight; a considerable number of their opponents pursued them, and were instantly destroyed. This however, did not suffice to decide the bloody :ontest: the main body of the English obstinately maintained their position, and, by always opposmg to the Normans a solid and 226 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 4. impenetrable i'nass, bade defiance to all their eflbrts. The battle con- tinued in this manner, with doubtful success, from nine in the morn- ing till about sun-set, when Harold, who had, like William, con- stantly animated his troops by word and example, was shot by an arrow which penetrated to the brain. He instantly fell among heaps of the dead, and the knowledge of his fall broke the spirit of the sur- viving English : at dusk they fled in utter confusion, dispersed through the woods, and were pursued, with great slaughter, by their victorious enemy. Such was the ever memorable battle of Hastings, which put an end to the Saxon line of monarchs, and placed the Norman dynasty on the throne of England. On the side of the conquerors, more than one-fourth of their army, v/hich amounted to almost sixty thousand men, were lefton the field; the number of the slain among the van- quished, although justly supposed to have been much greater, is un- known: al! agree at least in pronouncing the victory of William com- plete and decisive. After refreshing his army by a few days repose, and taking the castle of Dover, he marched straight to London. His unpx})ected presence spread terror and dismay among the people, the nobility and the clergy, who were there assembled; they however re- ceived him with expressions of congratulation, and made him a ten- der of the crown, which after a short pause he accepted. From the best and most impartial historians, it appears that the plan of William was that of a mild and moderate goverment. The first measures of his reign tended to sooth the feelings and to acquire the esteem of the English. Having, shordy after his coronation, made a tour through the kingdom, he every where scattered benefits around him, and graciously received the submission of his new sub- jects. The privileges of the citizens were rather increased, nor was any change attempted in their laws and customs, unless imperiously required by existing circumstances. It is true that, in order to secure their obedience, he built and garrisoned castles in various parts of the country, and granted valuable rewards to his Norman followers ; but the former step was a precautionary measure which it would be un- reasonable to blame in a conqueror; and the latter transaction ap- pears to have been so far conducted according to the strict rules of justice, as to give to no Englishman any just cause of complaint. These proceedings however displeased the natives, and William soon perceived that he had gained neither their favor nor confidence. As he had set out in the spring of 1067, to visit his continental do- minions, the English, no longer awed by his presence, thought it a happy opportunity to obtain their freedom. Their feelings of aver- eion for a foreign yoke were now highly exched by the imprudence of the governors, whom the Conqueror had left, and who. instead of 7 A. D. 1016 — 1089.] NORMANS IN ITALY. 227 adopting his system of conciliation, arrogantly oppressed the people; national animosity increased, discontent became general, and rebell.iou seemed every where inevitable. William, being informed of all this, returned to England with a secret determination to crush by severity, a people whom he could not gain by mildness. In fact, from this time forward, he laid a heavy hand upon his English subjects, and treated them with that rigor which he thought the right of conquest justified. He obliged them to extinguish their fires and candles at an early hour (eight o'clock) in the evening, the signal for which was given hy a bell called the curfew (couvre-feiC) ; nor were they permitted to rekindle their fires till the morning bell, which rang at four o'clock. His policy suffered no Englishman to hold any place of trust. By means of fines, land taxes, banishment, and sometimes capital executions for crimes of state, William had the disposal both of property and honors, and secured in his own hands the whole strength of the nation. If these measures terrified some of the natives, others raised the standard of insurrection in different parts of the kingdom. But nothing could surprise WiUiam. His vigilance, firmness and activity discon- certed all the plans, or baffled all the measures of the insurgents ; and his good fortune so constantly prevailed, that every attempt to ruin his power, served only to establish it more firmly. He maintained it with equal success against foreign enemies, the Scots, the Danes and the French. In fine, after having gloriously reigned during forty one years in Normandy, and twenty-one in England, he died in 1087 j odious indeed to many, on account of his severity, but still in point of natural talents, of enterprising spirit, of political and military achieve- ments, undoubtedly one of the first princes, and perhaps the most conspicuous sovereign of his age. His posterity, either in the right, or in the female line, has ever since occupied the throne of Great Britain. NORMANS IN ITALY— a. d. 1016-1089. The subjugation of England was not the only conquest made by ihe Normans in the eleventh century ; during the same period, other warriors of the same nation equally astonished Europe by their exploits in Italy. A little before the year lOlG, forty Normans, returning from a pilgrimage to the Holy Land, happened to stop at Salernum, a maritime town of Campania, at the very time Avhen iJ was closely besieged by the Saracens. These pilgrims Aveie men of remarkable size, warlike appearance and still greater courage. Hav- 228 MODEKN HISTORY. [PART 4. Ing penetrated into the town, they asked for arms and horses, and, making a sudden sally against the besiegers, slew many of them, put the rest to flight, and by a signal victory o])liged them to abandon the siege. Koth the prince and the inhabitants of Salernum exceedingly admired their valor, loaded them with presents, and endeavored to retain such useful warriors in their country. But they refused, alleging that they had fought for no other end than the glory of God and the honor of his religion. However, the Italians prevailed upon them to carry to their countrymen different kinds of excellent fruit, as proofs of the fertility of the land, and an inducement to come to Italy. To a warlike and enterprising people, proposals so flattering could not fail to be acceptable. Normans after Normans flocked to the peninsula, and, by defending it against its enemies and invaders, began to acquire in that delightful country rich and honorable settle- ments. Among "these fortunate adventurers, there was a whole family of heroes, consisting of the twelve sons of a certain Norman lord, called Tancrede, who, with the help of some hundreds of their countrymen, performed most surprising exploits. Sometimes united with the Lombards and Italians agamst the Greeks, sometimes with the Greeks against the Saracens, they became a match for all, de- feated numerous armies, took well defended and fortified towns, and subdued extensive provinces. Of these heroic brothers, the most illustrious were: William Iron- arm, who, by incredible exertions of courage, sohdly established the Normans in Apulia (a. d. 1043); Robert Guiscard, who stripped the Greeks of their last possessions in the same province (lOSO); and Roger, who expelled the Saracens for ever from Sicily (1089). All these conquered territories formed, when united, a powerful and flourishing state, which lasted upwards of one hundred years. During that interval, the Norman princes who ruled over it, con- tinued to inflict severe losses on the emperors of Constantinople, bui were themselves, in the end, obliged to yield to the emperors of Germany. CHIVALRY, PARTICULARLY IN SPA I iV.— RISE OF THE KINGDOM OF PORTUGAL —a. r. 1045—1095. The age which immediately preceded the Crusades, seemed lo have been eminently the age of chivalry properly so called. The order of chivalry was composed of Knights-Errant, who rode through all parts of tlie country, in complete arm 3r, for the purpose of redress- A. D. 1045—1095.] CHIVALRY, ETC. 229 ing grievances, and of protecting innocent, weak and afflicted persons, against tyranny and oppression. Their origin may be traced to the reign of Charlemagne, or thereabouts; their decline must be referred to the twelfth century, which gave rise to many Military Orders, of far greater merit and celebrity than private knighthood ; however, during the epoch of which we are now speaking, chivalry, notwith- standing the abuses that occasionally attended it, proved truly benefi- cial to humanity and social order in Europe, especially when there was question of defending Christians against infidels. Owing to its peculiar state of constant warfare against the Moors, Christian Spain possessed numbers of those generous knights ever ready to shed their blood in the cause of national glory, religion and justice. Among them, the foremost in heroic valor and fortitude was the illustrious Rodriguez Diaz of Bivar, who, during the filly last years of the eleventh century, did not cease to fight with wonder- ful success the enemies of his country. All Europe continually resounded with the fame of his prowess and repeated triumphs, of the battles he had fought, the victories he had won, the princes he had conquered, the towns he had subdued ; exploits so much the more astonishing, as they were effected entirely by his personal exer- tions, and frequently performed without any assistance from his sovereign. His fame extended even to Asia; and the Mahometan king of Persia sent deputies to the Christian knight of Spain, to con- gratulate him upon his glorious achievements. The name of Cid, or Seid (lord), under which he is known in history as well as poetry, was given him for the first time by the ambassadors of five Moorish chieftains whom he had just defeated in a great battle. It was chiefly with the help of this great warrior that King Al- fonso VI succeeded in the most important and difficult expedition as yet attempted by the Christians against the Moors. This prince cherished an ardent desire to reconquer Toledo, the ancient capital of the Goths, which had been in the power of their enemies for three hundred and seventy two years, and which contained nearly three hundred thousand inhabitants. No sooner was his intention made known, than, from all parts of Spain and other states of Christendom, multitudes of warriors and knights flocked to the standards of the Spanish monarch, to share with him in this glorious enterprise. The siege was long and perilous, and the defence was not less vigorous than the attack. At length the bravery of the Saracens yielded to the valor of the Christians, and, in the spring of 1085, Toledo, Avith many other towns, surrendered to Alfonso, who directly made it the capital of his kingdom and the seat of his residence, instead of Bur- gos, the chief city of old Castile. Among the foreign knights who had come to unite thefr efforts 20 230 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 4. with those of the Spaniards for the achievement of this great con- quest, the most distinguished were Counts Raymond and Henry of Burgundy, of the royal family of the Capetians in France. In every battle, they displayed a valor worthy of their rank, and on every occasion evinced such noble feelings, as to attract general esteem, and particularly that of the Spanish king. In order to secure their subsequent services, Alfonso gave them his daughters in marriage, and loaded them with honors which time rather increased. The posterity of Raymond inherited the throne of Castile, and occupied it until it passed, by alliance, to the house of Austria, in the begin- ning of the sixteenth century. Henry was invested with extensive power over the more Avestern provinces which had beeli taken from the Moors, and thus laid the foundation of the Portuguese monarchy, so called from Porto," its first capital (a. d. 1095). This new state, however, did not acquire the title of kingdom, until forty-four years later, when Alphonso Henriquez, the worthy son of Count Henry, having gloriously defeated five Saracen kings on the same day, was himself proclaimed king by his troops on the field of battle. AFFAIR OF INVESTITURES. During these civil revolutions in many parts of Christendom- transactions of a different nature engaged the public mind in Ger- many and northern Italy. The custom had been introduced in various places, and particularly throughout the German empire, of putting the newly elected bishops and abbots in possession of their benefices, by giving them the ring and the crosier, the symbols of pastoral authority. As this ceremony, called investiture, seemed to moply the conferring of spiritual jurisdiction by temporal princes, it was, after due examination, justly considered as an encroachment on the rights of the Church. Not content, however, with exercising it, the emperor Henry IV carried on a shameful and most scandalous traffic in ecclesiastical dignities, bestowing them, not on worthy can- didates, but on those who offered him the largest sums of money. Pope Gregory VII inveighed agamst these crying abuses with ardent zeal and unabated constancy. But both his entreaties and expostu- lations were disregarded; and the wicked emperor, instead of amend- ing his conduct, convened an assembly at Worms, in which, with a body of schismatical associates, he presumed to pass sentence of deposition against the pontiff" (a. d. 1076). This outrageous act served only to increase the zeal of Gregory He not only continued to govern the Church with apostolic vigor. AFFAIR OF INVESTITURES. 231 but even thought that liis duty required more than he had hitherto done. Witli the advice of a numerous council, and taking into coa- eideration both the incorrigibleness of Henry and the repeated com- plaints of his oppressed subjects, he excommunicated him, and pro- nounced him fallen from his royal dignity ; at the same time declaring the Germans no longer bound by their former oath of allegiance to tiim. Singular as the power may appear which Gregory then exer- cised, the general opinion of his contemporaries admitted that such power lay within the sphere of papal jurisdiction, and it was sup- ported by the civil and common jurisprudence of the times.* At the news of the sentence pronounced by the pope, the lords and princes of Germany assembled in great numbers, in order to appoint another emperor in the place of Henry. The distressed monarch perceived the gathering storm, and saw no means of averting it but by a reconciliation with the See of Rome ; he therefore departed in great haste for Italy, fully determined to effect this desired reconciha- tion on any terms. Gregory had left Rome and advanced as far as Canosse, a castle of Lombardy, on his way to Germany where he was expected by the princes. Henry, in a penitential garb, presented himself before the gates of the castle, humbly begging to be admitted into the presence of the pontiff, acknowledging his guilt, and with every mark of true repentance, expressing his readiness to make all the satisfaction in his power, Gregory, who had more than once experienced the insincerity and inconstancy of the emperor, kept hirn, by way of trial, in suspense for three days : on the fourth day, he gave him an audience, received his submission, and absolved him on certain conditions. But the repentance of Henry did not last more than fifteen days; having assembled a numerous army, he refused to comply with the terms v/hich he had accepted, and resumed his former course of violence against Church and State. At length the German lords, disgusted with this faithless and wicked monarch, proceeded to the election of another, and chose Rudolph, Duke of Suabia, for their sovereign. Stilly Henry remained master of the empire, his competitor having perished • This point has been, from a variety of public and authentic documents, set in the clearest light by the learned and judicious author of a work recently published in Paris, entiled: *' Fouvoir du Pape au moyca age." It is like- wise solidly proved by Count de Maistre {Du Pape, livre ii, ch. x.) ; by Abh6 Jager, (in his Introduction to the life of Gregory VII, translated from the German), etc. Nay, it is admitted by many celebrated Protestant writers, such as Leibnitz, De Jure Suprematiis, Pseliel, etc. and even by the infidels Bolingbroke and Voltaire. This alone must appear sufficient to r indicate the conduct of Pope Gregory with regard to the emperor Henry IV, and of some of his successors towards otlier sovereigns of the same stamp See, moreover, Note H. 232 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 4. in a battle near Mersburg, aftei three years of a dispult d succession Ca. d. 1080). Elated with success, the conqueror marched at the head of his troops into Italy, and besieged Rome, which he took after a long siege, more however by bribery than by force of arms. He entered the Lateran palace, and endeavored to cause the excommunicated bishop of Ravenna, Guibert, to be declared pope, under the name of Clement III. In the meantime, Gregory had retreated into the strong castle of St. Angelo, where he remained secure tdl the arrival of Robert Guiscard, the valiant leader of the Normans, who compelled the emperor to retire with his anti-pope. The lawful pontiff was thus left master of .the cityj but, as party violence rendered it either unsafe or unpleasant for him to reiliain there, he removed first to Mount Cassino, and thence to Salerno, where he was taken danger- ously ill. In his last moments, he uttered these words : '* I have loved justice, and hated iniquity j wherefore I die in a strange land;" after which, amidst the prayers and tears of the cardinals and bishops who had gathered around him, he calmly expired, on the 25th of May, 1085. Far diiTerent was the end of his violent persecutor. The obstinate perseverance of Henry in the schism kept up a strong opposition against him in Germany; so much so, that his own sons openly revolted, and obliged him to abdicate the crown. The dethroned monarch retired to Liege, where he died shortly after, like the ancient persecutors of the Church, a prey to excessive grief and misery, and an object of indignation to the whole world. He had reigned about fifty years, and during that time, had been present in sixty -two battles, in most of which he was victorious. His exploits, his bravery, and his talents might have ranked him among the greatest emperors of Germany, had he not disgraced himself by his perfidy, and by yield- ing to detestable and unruly passions. The question of investitures was settled after his death; in the year 1122, the emperor Henry V agreed to resign the ustom of giving the ring and the crosier, and this transaction was solemnly confirmed by the first general council of Lateran, in H23. REMARKS ON THE MIDDLE AGES. TRUCE OF GOD The nmth, tenth and eleventh centuries, are commonly called the middlej and, by a numerous class of writers, the dark ages. To Iincw whether or how far this second appellation is correct, deserves EE^IARKS ON THE MIDDLE AGES. 233 a particulai iavesligatioii, and will be the object of the following remarks. In the first place, it must he confessed that, a short time after the reign of Charlemagvie, ignorance began anew to make great progress in Europe, especially among nobles, many of whom, being exclu- sively given to the profession of arms, even boasted of their want of mstruction and literary knowledge.* But never perhaps were more strenuous efforts made to keep alive the sacred flame of science, and promote the instruction of youth, than were made by the Church at the period of which we are speaking.f Besides smaller schools for children in country parishes, there were in large cities, in monaste- ries, and in episcopal houses, various institutions in which a relish for study and learning was carefully preserved. In these, besides the Holy Scriptures and Christian doctrine, the students could learn what was then termed the seven hberal arts ; Grammar, Logic, Rhetoric, Arithmetic, Geometry, Astronomy and Music. Many schools of this kind are known to have existed in Italy, England, France, Germany, ' etc. such as those of Rome, Lyons, Paris, York, Oxford, Fuld, Ratisbon, Paderborn,^ etc. They did not, it is true, possess men like * Many deeds and legal instruments of those ages are found, which ter- minate thus: "And the aforesaid lord has declared that he did not know how to sign his name, owing to his being a nobleman." t See the decrees of Popes Eugenius II, Leo IV, etc. in the councils of Rome, A. D. 826, 853, etc.; — the canons of the councils of Mentz and Cha- lons, A. D. 813; of Paris, 829; of Valence, 855; of Toul, 859, etc: — and the statutes of Herard, Archbishop of Tours ; of Riculfus bishop of Sois- sons ; etc. Merely to quote one or two of these decrees ; the council of Toul, in the tenth canon, earnestly entreats princes and recommends to bishops to establish every where public schools, for the teaching of both sacred science and polite literature : and Herard, archbishop of Tours, in his book of synodical regulations, commands his priests to have, as far as they can, schools in their parishes. Not long before, Thcodulphe, bishop of Orleans, had expressed himself thus, in the 20th Art. of his 1st Capitular: " Let the priests establish schools in towns and villages for the instruction of children, and not refuse to receive and teach those who are personally addressed to them. But in so doing, let them require no salary, nor accept any thing but what may be voluntarily and charitably otfered by the parents." X In Paderbornensi ecclesia publica floruerunt studia, quandd ibi musici fuerunt.etdialectici enituerunt, rhetoric!, clarique grammatici. Ubi mathe- matici claruerunt, et astronomici habebantur, physici atque geometrici. ^Viguit Horatius, magnusque Virgilius, Sallustius et Statins. Jpud Tho- inassin, Discipl. de VEgl. Part, ir, I. i,ch. 99, n. 2;— I'O.. ii, col. 638. In the same chapter and in other chapters of the same work, the learned Oratorian shows that studies were also very flourishing in the schools of •/Vorms, Paris, Lyons, and still more so in that of Rome, of which he speak? at length, and then says: "Let us conclude that the pontifical palace of Rome \vas the palace of polite literature, and the sanctuary of ecclesias. tical learning." ch. 100, n. 3. See also on this subject, Digby's Jges of Faith, vol. II, part iii, ch. 5 and 6. 20* 234 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 4. St. Basil and St. John Chrysostom, Fenelon and Bossuei, Newton and Leibnitz; yet it cannot be denied that they produced many learned writers and eminent scholars, who might have become models for posterity in point of literature and learning, had they enjoyed the number of books and other advantages which we now possess. Whatever may be the diffusion of superficial knowledge at the pre- sent day, it may certainly be doubted whether in point of solid, pro- found and extensive learning, many persons could be found superior to such men as Lupus, abbot of Ferrieres, a writer of the ninth century, in whose treatises and letters all impartial critics acknow- ledge an immense fund of erudition; or St. Brunon, archbishop of Cologne in the tenth century, whose biographers relate that there was no part of Latin and Greek literature, no branch of sacred and profane learning, with which he was not familiar.* The same, or nearly the same, may be said of the following authors, as their own writings testify : Agobardus, archbishop of Lyons, who died in 840; — Rabanus, archbishop of Mentz, 856; Paschasius Radbertus, a monk, 865; — St. Ado, archbishop of Vienna, in France, 875; — Anastasius, the Roman librarian, 880; — Hincmar, archbishop of Rheims, 882; — Remigius of Auxerre, a monk, 908; — Notker, a monk of St. Gal, 912;— Atto, bishop of Vercelli, 960; — Flodoardus, a canon in the church of Rheims, 966; — Sylvester II, pope, 1003; — Abbo, a monk and abbot of Fleury, 1004; — Fulbert, bishop of Chartres, 1029;— St. Peter Damian, cardinal, 1072; — St. Gregory VII, pope, 1085; — Lanfrancus, archbishop of Canterbury, 1089; — St. Bruno, founder of the Carthusian order, 1101 ; — St. Anselm, archbishop of Canter- bury, 1108; — and many others, equally belonging to the clergy or to religious orders. To speak now of laymen ; although generally less fond of study and less instructed, it ought not to be imagined that they were plunged m a state of barbarism and complete darkness — far from it; an atten- tive perusal of the history of the middle ages Avill rather lead to the conclusion, that, without knowing how to display much elegance in their manners, and to appreciate the flowing periods of Demosthenes and Cicero, they had, in their noble simplicity, as much good sense and judgment with regard to affairs of real importance, as we have in this our age of light, and frequently more than we manifest They knew how to set a higher value on religion than on temporal concerns, even their own lives ; they knew how to refer their best * Prccter Sacras litieras, quidquid historici, oratores, poetse atque philoso- plii, novum et grande perstrepunt, diligentissirae cum doctoribus cnj,us cumque linguae perscrutatus est. Nullum penitus erat studiorum liberahum genus, in omni Gra^ca vel Latina eloquentia, quod ingenii sui vivacitotf^m aufugeret. — Jlpud Thomass. lib. cit. c. 99, n .3. REMARKS ON THE MIDDLE AGES. 235 achievements in the arts to the honor and service of the Almighty, rather than to the petty motives of selfish gratification and human applause; they knew, too, how to examine attentively diflScuit mat- ters, to reason with accuracy, to act with prudence, to succeed in comi)licated negotiations, and adopt the best course in perplexing cir- cumstances: witness, among others, the emperor Otho I in Ger- many; Kings Alfred, Edgar and Canute in England; Hugh Capet in France; Alfonso III in Spain, and John of Gortz and Luitprand, the ambassadors of Otho I to the courts of Cordova and Constan- tinople. Nor did our ancestors want sagacity and genius for useful discove- ries and improvements, since many of this kind were made during the middle ages. It was at the end of the tenth century, that Gerbert, a monk, afterwards archbishop of Ravenna, and at length pope under the name of Sylvester II, invented clocks with a balance, Avhich con- tinued in use till pendulums began to be employed in 1650. To him also arithmetic was greatly indebted for its progress. About the same time, lanterns, and paper made of cotton rags, commenced to be used. Towards the year 1022, Guy, a monk of Arezzo in Italy, invented and introduced into the Church singing the gamut, or scale of musical notes, by which a child can learn in a few months, what no person before could learn without several years of study. With regard to mechanical arts, it is enough to read the history of the siege of Jerusalem in 1099, to know what wonderful and complicated machines of every description were constructed by the first crusaders^ men consequently of the middle ages. Still, if credit were to be given to certain authors, the inhabitants of western Europe, at the time of which we are speaking, were mere barbarians, compared with the Arabs, to whom alone, we are told, belonged the honor of cultivatmg letters and the arts and sciences, This notion is altogether false and unjust. The Arabs indeed, whether in the empire of Bagdad or in the kingdom of Cordova, dis- tinguished themselves by a great show of politeness and magnifi- cence, by some happy discoveries, and the brilliant dreams of their imagination ; but that they were superior, in point of solid acquire- ments, to the Christian nations of Europe, it would be difficult to prove, and may be justly doubted.* Their metaphysical science * Even at the time when arts and sciences were in their most flourishing gtate among the eastern Arabs, namely, under Al-Mamon, the son and second successor of Aaron-Al-Raschid; that caliph was himself oblia:ed to acknowledge the superiority of Christian scholars over his subjects. In his own palace, a Greek slave, who had formerly studied mathemalics in Con- stantinople, confounded all the doctors and masters of the court. Whilst all present stood astonished, the slave said that there were many persons among his countrymen more skilful than himself, above all, a certain pM- 236 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 4. instead of being a source of true learning, was filled up with subtilties taken from the catpgories of Aristotle ; their astronomical observa- tions were blended with the ridiculous theories of astrology, and their prejudices against anatomy and surgery greatly impeded the progress of the art of medicine. They did not improve any better in historical composition, which was characterized among them by strange re marks, a bombastic style, and exaggerated accounts. Hence, the learned author of a recent history of the crusades, does not hesitate to prefer the plain and unaffected narratives of the first crusade, left by some Christian writers of the eleventh century, to the Arabian records of the same epoch. * Another, and a still more striking vindication of the middle ages against the charge of complete darkness, is to be found in the great number of splendid churches that were then built throughout Chris- tendom, many of which still exist ; for, as several learned men have justly remarked, the state of architecture has always been in every country a sure proof of the degree of perfection in which the other arts flourished. Not only was this advantage possessed by England during the reign of the great Alfred, but also by other countries under less favorable circumstances, particularly on the following occasion. A little before the close of the tenth century, an opinion had been entertained by many simple persons, that the world would end with the year 1000, nor had the writings of learned men been able to remove that imaginary fear. But when all saw the eleventh century begin without accident, joy took the place of terror, and the gratitude of the people towards Almighty God prompted them to repair churches, or build new ones still more worthy, by their splen- dor, of being consecrated to his honor. Then, indeed, arose in different parts of Christendom, those Gothic temples, the appearance of which, at once grand, majestic and im- posing, will never be eclipsed by the flimsy elegance of most of our modern edifices. Then were laid in many European cities the foun- dations of those splendid cathedrals, in which we still admire the symmetrical rows of beautiful pillars supporting immense arched roofs, the towering steeples, and a thousand other ornaments: monu- ments the more astonishing and worthy of admiration, as they are found even in many inconsiderable cities, and bear testimony to the grand iaeas, as well as to the zeal and piety of our European ancestors losopher, called Leo, from whom he had received lessons. In fact, as a geometer and an astronomer, Leo had not his equal in the whole empire. The caliph endeavored, but in vain, by the most fiatterins; letters and pro- mises, to bring him over to Bagdad: the Emperor Theophilus would never let him go, nor consent to deprive his own t apital of so distinguished a scholar. — See Lebeau, Hist, du Baa. Emp. vol. xvi, pp. 4-il, 446. * Miehaut, Hist, des Croisades, vol i, p, 519. REMARKS ON THE MIDDLE AGES. 237 In fine, it was also during the middli ages that, through missiona- ries from Italy, Germany, France, England, etc. northern Europe received the light of the gospel; that the Normans, the Ilungarians, the Danes, the Swedes, the Russians, the Lithuanians, the Poles, etc. began at the same time to become Christian and civilized nations. But how could this, we may ask, have been effected by any of their contemporaries, had those contemporaries been themselves mere bar- barians? How could so arduous a task ever have been undertaken and performed, except by men equally zealous and learned, equally possessed of heroic virtues and great mental acquirements? And indeed, that such were the qualifications of the missionaries who subjected these nations to the laws of Christianity, we learn from all the documents of that period. From this variety of evidence and facts, we are certainly author- ized to conclude, in the first place, that the opinion commonly enter- tained about the middle ages is egregiously wrong, their pretended state of stupidity and barbarism never having had any existence, except in the theories of modern invention : and secondly, that it is to the Catholic Church, to her popes, bishops and monks, that we stand indebted for the preservation of civihzation, literature, arts and sciences in Europe. The complete revival of letters came from the same source, and the progress of ignorance, after having been vigor- ously opposed even in the most difficult times, was at length effec- tually checked (a. d. 1 179 — 1215), by the decrees of Popes Alexander III and Innocent III, in the third and fourth councils of Lateran, conformably to which decrees, colleges and universities began to spring up in every part of Christendom. Anotner excellent institution that owed its existence to the mid- die ages, and for which humanity was also indebted to the happy influence of religion, was the sacred compact usually termed the Truce of God. From the ninth to the eleventh century3 the feudal system, however beautiful in many of its principles, had been a con- slant source of contentions and Svars. Each petty chieftain arrogated to himself an almost unlimited use of force and violence to avenge his wrongs, and pursue his rights whether real or pretended. As, moreover, vassals were obliged to espouse the quarrels of their imme- diate lords, rapine, bloodshed and their attendant miseries were to be seen every where; nor could the most pacific citizens depend on one moment of perfect security, either for their properties or their lives. Religion, by her divine and universally revered authority, was alone capable of raising an efficacious barrier agninst this torrent of evils. Experience liaving already shown the impossibility of stem- ming it at once, prutlent mtasures were taken gradually to diminish ib? violence. Se\eral bishops ordered under penalty of excomumni- 238 MODEEN HISTORY. [PART cation that, every week, during the four days consecrated to th( memory of our Saviour's passion, death, burial and resurrectionJ viz. from the afternoon of Wednesday till the morning of the fol-j lowing Monday, whatever might be the cause of strife and quarreli all private hostilities should cease. Shortly after, the same pro| hibition was extended to the whole time of Advent and Lent, in- cluding several weeks both after Christmas and after Easter-Sun- day. This beneficial institution, which originated in France to- wards the year 1040, was adopted in England, Spain, etc. and was confirmed by several popes and councils : nor must it be thought that it remained a dead letter; its succes-, on the contrary, was so remarkable, that the pious age in which the experiment was made, hesitated not to attribute it to the interposition of heaven. Thus, by the exertions of ecclesiastical authority, the horrors and calamities of feudal loar began to be considerably lessened and abridged. Its ravages were restrained to three days in the week and to certain seasons of the year; during the intervals of peace, there was leisure for passion to cool, for the mind to sicken at a languishing warfare, and for social habits to become more and more deeply rooted. A considerable number of days and weeks afforded security to all, and all, being now shielded by the religious sanction of this sacred compact, could travel abroad, or attend to their domestic affairs, without danger of molestation. Such was the splendid victory which the religion of Christ won over the natural fierceness of the ancient tribes of the north; a victory whose completion was also due to her influence, when the crusades obliged those restless war- riors to turn against the invading hordes of the Saracens and Turks. liiose weapons which they had iiitherto so frequently used against their fellow-Christians. PART V. FROM THl BEGINNWG OF THE CRUSADES (A. D. 1095), TO THEIR END (A. D. 1272). ORIGIN AND CAUSES OF THE CRUSADES. We have now reached the eventful period in which a violent strug- gle took place between two great divisions of the globe, for the pos- session of Jerusalem and Palestine ; when Europe, shaken, as it were, to its foundation, seemed repeatedly to precipitate itself against Asia. The better to fix our attention on so grand and interesting a subject, we will be more than ever careful to say Hide about contem- porary transactions of merely secondary importance. By Crusades are meant those military expeditions which were set on foot under the banner of the cross, for the purpose of delivering the Holy Land from the oppressive yoke of the Mahometans. Nu- merous and forcible were the motives that urged the nations of Eu- rope to engage in these expeditions. New hordes of barbarians were threatening to invade all Christendom, and required a powerful bar- rier to check their destructive course. The Seljukian Turks had conquered, within a few years, the fairest portions of western Asia; the extent of the Greek empire was more and more reduced by theii usurpations; and the emperor Alexius Comnenus, harassed and dis- tressed on every side, eagerly solicited the assistance of the Latins against the common enemy of Christianity. On the other hand, public indignation was roused throughout Eu- rope by the daily recital of the enormities which the Arabs and Turks committed in the Holy Land, and of the cruel treatment which they inflicted on the Christians, whether inhabitants of the country, or travellers and pilgrims who went to Jerusalem. At this period, a lively faith and fervent piety induced multitudes of Christians from all countries to visit the places consecrated by the sufferings of our Redeemer. When, after a thousand dangers and hardships, they ar- rived in Palestine, the gates of Jerusalem were open^^d only to these who could pay a piece of gold; and, as most of them were poor, or 240 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 5. had been plundered on the way, they were obliged to linger in wretchedness around the city for which they had left their native land and every domestic comfort. Many died with hunger, or fell by the sword of the barbarians. In the city itself, they who had been al- lowed to enter it, were exposed, like its Christian inhabitants, to alj sorts of torments and outrages, some being loaded with chains, some forced to draw a car or a plough, and others condemned to an isfno- mmious death. Such as could escape and return to Europe, did not fail to relate what they had seen and suffered ; and these reports, be- ing widely circulated, excited universal commiseration among the faithful, and prepared their minds for some extraordinary exertion. FIRST CRUSADE.— A. d. 1095—1099. Such were the feelings of Christian Europe when a French priest, called Peler, and surnamed the Hermit on account of his retired life, undertook a pilgrimage to Jerusalem. Seeing the cruel oppression which weighed down his brethren in Asia, his sensible heart was deeply afflicted; and, after a moving interview Avith Simeon, the pious patriarch of Jerusalem, he prevailed upon him to write to the pope, and to the princes of Europe, for the purpose of imploring their assistance, offering himself to be his deputy and the bearer of his letters. This measure being readily adopted, Peter set out from Palestine, crossed the seas, and, landing on the Italian coast, hastened to the pope. Urban II. The pontiff received him with kindness, lis- tened to him with emotion, praised his devotedness and zeal; and, as he himself was convinced of the necessity of opposing the alarm- ing progress of the infidels, and of rescuing the eastern Christians from oppression, he commissioned Peter to go forward and preach every where in favor of the speedy deliverance of Jerusalem. The generous hermit was eminently quahfied for this noble office, [Jnder a poor garb and mean appearance, he possessed an elevated mind, great energy of soul, and heroic sentiments; his pathetic and glowing eloquence readily found its way to the hearts of his hearers, He travelled through Italy, France, and other countries, communi- cating to all by his preaching and his exhortations, the zeal with which he himself was animated. The pope soon followed him, and, after a first council held at Placentia in Italy, appointed, for the final decision, another to be celebrated at Clermont in France, towards the close of the year 1095. The assembly met at the time and place which had been assigned, and, from the great number of bishops, princes, dukes, and other A. D. 1095 — 1099.] FIRST CRUSADE. 241 distinguished persons who composed it, together with an immense crowd of spectators, it might be considered a general convention of Christendom. Peter the hermit having first spoken with his usual ardor in favor of the holy war. Pope Urban also delivered an eloquent and animated discourse, at the end of which the whole assembly spon- taneously exclaimed: God wills it; God wills it. Most of those who were present, hastened to be enrolled for the sacred expedition. They wore, as a mark of their engagement, a cross made of red stuff, and commonly fastened on the right shoulder j whence, originated the name of Crusaders and Crusade. The same enthusiasm spread rapidly through the other cities and the various states of Christendom. Those who, in the council of Clermont, had listened to the animating voice of the pontiff, on their return to their homes diffused a similar fervor among their country men. Thousands and thousands flocked to the banner of the cross from every part of Europe, particularly from France and Italy where all ranks manifested the greatest eagerness to share in tne cru- sade, and, forgetting their private quarrels, began to prepare for their departure into the East. Among the princes who engaged themselves in the holy war at the head of their vassals and subjects, the most illustrious were : Raymond, count of Toulouse ; Robert, duke of Normandy, and brother of the king of England ; Hugh-the-Great, count of Vermandois, and brother of the French king; Stephen, count of Blois; Robert, earl of Flanders j Godfrey of Bouillon, duke of Lorraine, with his two brothers Eus- tace and Baldwin ; in fine, Bohemond, prince of Tarentum, with his heroic nephew, Tancred, the very personification of ancient chi- valry. Warriors like these might have conquered the world, had there been stricter discipline and order among their troops, and better understanding among themselves; but this could hardly be expected from so many different nations, and from so many princes indepen-. dent of each other, and all worthy of the chief command. One of them, however, Godfrey of Bouillon, without being in vested with the title of commander-in-chief, generally held the firsi rank in the army, this privilege being the natural consequence of his reputation for unblemished virtue and extraordinary valor. Although he was not, by birth, either the most conspicuous or the most power- ful of the lords who headed the crusade, he brought to the field no fewer than ninety thousand chosen troops, whom the reputation of his uncommon merit had gathered to his standard. The whole num- ber of the crusaders may have amounted, in the beginning, to seven or eight hundred thousand, having among them, as legate of the pope, the celebrated bishop of Puy, Adhemar de Monteil, a prelate equally renowned for his consummate prudence and tender piety. 21 242 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 5. At the close ot winter, ihey set out IVoin various points, and ad- vanced towards the East in different directions. Tlie first bodies .ihal marched forward, being destitute of discipUne, met, with few excep- tions, a disastrous fate. Some of them, as soon as they entered Asia, fell by the swords of the Turks; others could not even reach tho capital of the Greek empire, but were slain, in their march through Hungary and Bulgaria, by the inhabitants, whose attacks they had provoked by their own excesses (a. d. 1096). The principal leaders of the expedition acted with more prudence, and arrived in safety at Constantinople, which had been selected for their general rendezvous. Here they met with an unforeseen obsta- cle. The Greek emperor, who had expected only some bodies of troops to assist him in repelUng the Turks, could not see such a mul- titude of warriors covering his empire, and so formidable a force encamped under the very walls of his capital, without apprehending an attack against himself. In his perplexity, he resolved to adopt towards the crusaders a course of dissimulation and craftiness, which it is not easy to reconcile with the usual courage, generosity and other noble qualities of Alexius. He loaded the chiefs with pre- sents, used every means in his power to attach them to his interest, and making them fair promises of powerful aid, gave directions that vessels should be prepared, with the utmost despatch, to convey them across the Bosphorus to the Asiatic coast. The Christian army, consisting of about six hundred thousand men, about one sixth cavalry, directed their march to Nice, the chief city of Bithynia. This town, famous for the reception it formerly gave to the Fathers of two general councds, w^as now in the power of the Turkish Sultan Kilidgi Arsland, or Soliman the younger: a prince highly commendable for the inexhaustible resources of his genius and the unshaken firmness of his character. At the head of a numerous body of cavalry, he moved forward to protect his capital. Furious and repeated attacks were made against the Christian camp, but, after prodigious efforts, the crusaders remained masters of the field, and bore off" the spoils. Soliman himself could not forbear admiring the lion-like courage of the Christian leaders, who, with a thousand lances, would often break and put to flight twenty times »hat number of Turkish troops. Thus repulsed v/ith great loss, he retired to a distance in order to collect new forces, and attack tho Christians at their departure with greater advantage. The siege was now carried on with unabated vigor, the besiegers and (he besieged making use of all the resources that military science had hitherto devised for the attack and defence of fortified places. Besides a double wall and a numerous garrison, the city was pro- tected on one side by large ditches, and on the other, bv the lake A. D. 1095^1099.] FIRST CRUSADE. 243 Ascanius ; but the Christian warriors were not to be stopped or dis- pirited by these obstacles. They at length succeeded in preventing all access to the town, even by the lake; and Count-Raymond under- mined one of the principal towers. Nice, reduced to the last extremi ty, was on the point of being stormed, when the flags of the Greek emperor suddenly appeared on the walls, Alexius, by private embar*- sies, having prevailed upon the inhabitants to surrender to him rather than -to the Franks. This artful conduct highly displeased the cru- saders : still, not to break their treaty with the Greeks, nor be diverted from the main object of their enterprise, they consented to leave the town in the hands of Alexius ; for, they had previously promised him to conquer in his name, and to restore the cities which had formerly belonged to the empire of Constantinople, on condition that he should aid them in the conquest of the Holy Land. As, however, the Greek monarch soon evinced little inclination to fulfil his own promises, the Latin lords thought themselves no longer bound by the treaty. Shortly after the reduction of Nice, they began to occupy the cities of Asia-Minor and Syria, to leave garrisons in them, and appoint governors in their own name. Tarsus and the rest of Cilicia were already in their possession, when Baldwin, the brother of Godfrey led ofT a detached body of crusaders towards the north, and traversed a long tract of country inhabited entirely by Christians, till he came to the Euphrates. The citizens of Edessa, in Mesopo tamia, as soon as they heard of his arrival, invited him to take them under his protection. He cheerfully acceded to their request, took possession of the sovereign power among them, and established a principality, which stood until the year 1144, when it was subdued by the famous chieftains Zenghi and Nouradin. A little before the departure of Baldwin, the crusaders were exposed to a greater danger than they had yet encountered. As they were marching in two great divisions, the less numerous body, commanded by Robert of Normandy, Bohemond and Tancrcd, was suddenly attacked near Dorylffium in Phrygia, by a countless multitude of Turks, Persians and Arabs, who covered all the hills and plains as far as the sight could extend.* Bohemond instantly sent messengers to Godfrey of Bouillon and to the other princes, whom he knew to be near, to inform them of the danger with which he was threatened. In the interim, he drew up his forces as well as the spot permitted, and, Qt their head, together with Duke Robert and Tancred, exerted all his courage, to resist the shock of the enemy. The battle lasted for many • The number of the Turks and Persians is believed to have amounted to nearly two hundred thousand men, all on horseback ; as to the Arab^, says a contemporary historiaji v/ho was present at the battle, so great was their multitude, that God alone could count them. 244 MODERN HISTORY. [pART 5. hours J but about noon, the Christians, forced back by tiie multitude that pressed upon them, and exhausted with heat, thirst and fatigue began to give way before the Saracens, and their defeat seemed inevi- table, when repeated shouts and a cloud of dust rising from behind the hills, announced the arrival of the main body of the crusaders. Godfrey, Hugn-tne-Great, and Robert of Flanders, had taken the lead with fifty thousand cavalry; Raymond of Toulouse and Adhe- mar of Puy were followmg as rapidly as possible with the rest of the army. Each one arrayed his troops, as they came up; and, after the usual cry, *^God Wills it," all, with levelled lances, advanced against the Turks, who vainly endeavored to maintain the superiority which they had acquired. Unable to bear the charge of the Latin, chivalry, the infidels fled in disorder, and abandoned to the Christians their camp with all their provisions and treasures (a. d. 1097). The loss of the crusaders, after so long and severe a battle, was less than might have been anticipated; only four thousand of thera are said to have fallen, and nearly all in the earlier part of the day. The loss of the Turks was far more considerable, as ic amounted to upwards of twenty thousand soldiers and three thousand officers, with several of their generals. Those who escaped, spread them- selves, by the orders of Soliman, in large bands over the country, and despairing to defend it any longer, began to waste and destroy every thing in their way. When the crusading armies, alter some days of repose, resumed their march, they found themselves obliged to go across large tracts which had been completely ravaged by the enemy. There, in barren plains or narrow defiles, under a scorching sun, and without water to quench their thirst, thousands sunk under the accu- mulated weight of fatigue and sickness, and most of the horses per- ished. Still, the survivors marched on with unshaken resolution, and at length reached a better country. After subduing many towns, and defeating many parties of Turks, they saw themselves in the midst of dehghtful plains, near the great and well fortified city of Antioch, the capital of Syria. In a council of war held by the leaders, it was thought unsafe to leave so important a place behind thera. Accordingly, they resolved to besiege it; an undertaking, which the strength of the ramparts, the valor of the garrison, and the imprudence of the crusaders, ren- dered both tedious and difficult. At first, many of the Christians, delighted with the beauty of the land, spread themselves without precaution through the neighboring plains, where they were sur- prised and slaughtered by the Turks. Others, forg«Btting their duty and the laws of the Gospel, gave themselves up to many disorders, which God did not delay to punish, want of food during winter, continual rains and other calamities having soon caused the death of A. D. 1095—1099.] FIRST CRUSADE. 245 many, and made others repent of their excesses. At length, the united exertions of the princes and clergy put an end to those evils. Abundance returned with the spring; the courage of the troops was revived with the restoration of good order and discipline; and the Moslems were repulsed, whenever they attempted to attack the Christian camp, whether from the town or from the neighboring country. On one occasion, particularly, they were entirely defeated, and, by the vigorous efforts of the Christian knights, experienced siicn slaughter, as to lose twelve of their generals called emirs, and fifteen hundred of their most distinguished warriors, besides a multi- tude of others who were drowned in the river Orontes. Still, Antioch continued to resist with undaunted obstinacy. Every means employed by the crusaders to batter its mighty bulwarks, proved ineffectual; and all their efforts might ultimately have failed, but for the following circumstance. The prince of Tarentum had of late opened a secret correspondence with a Mussulman officer named Phirouz, formerly a Christian, who was invested with the chief com- mand in three of the principal towers that defended Antioch. By splen- did promises, Bohemond succeeded in inducing this officer to deliver them into the hands of the Christians. The plan was concerted be- tween them; the darkness of a stormy night facilitated its execution; and in a few hours the whole army, being introduced into the city, took possession of it on the third of June, 1098, At the break of day, Bohemond planted his banner on one of the highest towers, and was, by common assent, acknowledged sovereign of Antioch and its dependencies, under the title of prince. The joy of the crusaders at this valuable conquest, was in a very short time damped, and changed into distress. They had not yet subdued the citadel, into which a great part of the garrison had re- tired, nor taken measures to procure the necessary supplies of provi- oions, when they saw themselves besieged by an army much moro numerous than their own. It consisted of three hundred and sixty thousand men, whom the Persian sultan sent to the relief of Antioch, under the command of Kerboga, prince of Mosul, This general manifested on every occasion the greatest contempt for the crusa- ders; and, having arrived too late to preserve the city from their invasion, he considered them as so many victims reserved for his vengeance. Every thmg, at first, seemed to favor his design. After a few days, the crusaders, having consumed all the provisions in Antioch, were exposed to a most dreadful famine, so far as to eat the flesh of horses and camels, afterwards leaves of trees, and boiled leather guch was the excess of their misery, that many of these renowned warriors, even among the barons and knights, after having resolutely 21* 246 MODEEN HISTORY. [PART 6. endured a thousand other hardships, now lost courage abandoned their colors, and fled from Anlioch. Both the strength and resourcoG of those who remained, were exhausted. Several of the chief lords themselves were reduced to absolute beggary, and became completely dependent on the bounty of Godfrey even for their food, till he him- self, having killed his last horse, had nothing more to give. Mourn- ing, consternation and death reigned throughout Anlioch, and the whole city seemed destined to become the sepulchre of the Christian soldiers J nor could the princes, either by exertions or entreaties, stimulate them to new combats. In this desperate state of things, the evil suggested its remedy. The crusaders, deprived of all human assistance, placed their hopes in heaven ; and, in the abyss of misery to which they were reduced, they received with the greatest alacrity every token and mark of the return of God's special protection, their Avarlike enthusiasm being Darticularly excited, as many authors relate, by the discovery of the lance which had pierced the side of our Saviour. In the meanwhile, Tancrjed, ever foremost in heroic feelings and actions, pledged him- self with an oath not to turn back from the road to Jerusalem, so long as he should be followed by sixty knights; and the whole army, imi- tating his example, took the same oath. In fine, the unexpected discovery of some provisions in the city increased the confidence and restored the strength of the soldiers of the cross. Their activity, reso- lution, and energy reappeared; they felt in themselves the same intre- pid ardor which they had displayed in former battles, and loudly asked to be led against the enemy. The princes lost not a moment. The gates of Antioch were thrown open, and early on the morning of the twenty -ninth of June, one hundred thousand emaciated but brave warriors were seen marchmg out with noble assurance, whilst the banks of the Orontes and the neighboring hills resounded with their usuai battle cry, "God wills it; God wills it." Kerboga did not imagine, at first, that the crusaders could entertain the thought of fighting, and believed they were coming to implore his clemency. His illusion having soon vanished, he hastened to draw up his numberless squadrons in battle array, and made several skilful movements for the purpose of surroundmg the comparatively small host of the crusaders. The Christians, on their side, with little attention to the ordinary arts of warfare, continued to march on, their courage increasing rather than diminishing; till, having come within bowshot of the Persians, after the clarions and trumpets had sounded, both generals and soldiers rushed against the enemy. Then only did Kerboga and his troops perceive what sort of heroes were Tancred, Godfrey, Hugh-the-Great, the duke of Normandy and A. D. 1095 — 1099.] FIRST CRUSADE. 247 the earl of Flanders, whose swords flashed with the rapidity of lightning. In proportion as the other chiefs arrived, they also threv; themselves into the thickest of the batlle; and the fight had scarcely lasted one hour, when the infidels began to waver. They endea- vored, but in vain to stop the Christian soldiers oy setting the weeds on fire; nothing could damp the enthusiasm of the crusaders: the Persian columns were driven forward, broken and routed with dread- ful slaughter. In vain too did their most courageous warriors attempt to rally upon a hill behind a deep ravine; the Christian knights, hur- ried on by almost superhuman valor, followed them across the pre- cipice, and their victorious swords destroyed all who dared wait their approach. The Persians were sctittered in every direction through the woods and hollows; and the banks of the Orontes, the mountains, the plains, appeared covered with fugitives abandoning their colors and throwing aside their arms. The liaughty Kerboga himself, who had promi:>ed ih.-; sultan the entire defeat of the Christians, and who had, in anticipation of that event, prepared a great quantity of fetters for his prisotier^, lied towards the Euphrates with a few horsemen, leaving a hiaidred thousand of his bravest soldiers on the field of battle. The io.^s of the conquerors was ten, or, according to several historians, only four liiousand. Immense v/as the booty in gold, arms, rich vestments, horses, cat- tle and provisions, which the crusaders found in the Persian camp. The whole army, loaded with wealth and rejoicing in their abun- dance, entered once more within the walls of Antioch, and made the air resound with their thanksgivings for the triumph which they had obtained. To the Saracens themselves this victory of the Christians seemed so wonderful, that many were induced, on that account, to abandon the religion of Mahomet. They who defended the citadel of Antioch, struck with astonishment and terror, surrendered, in the very evening of the battle, to Count Raymond who had been left to guard the town; three hundred of them embraced Christianity; and several went through the cities of Syria, every where publishing that the God of the Christians was the only true God. The way towards Jerusalem was now left free; the princes, how- ever, for the sake of granting to their troops a necessary repose, thought proper to postpone their further advance till the next spring. In that interval, a pestilence broke out among the crusaders, sweep- ing off not only thousands of the less cautious multitudes, but also many illustrious knights, and the venerable bishop of Puy, whose noble qualities of mind and heart had given much dignity and strength [o the enterprise. Another sad effect of the delay just mentioned, was that it enabled the Egyptian caliph to turn the losses of th« l\ir!ts to his own profit: driving them from Jerusalem, whilst he 1 248 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 5. amused the leaders of the ciusading host with proposals of aUiance, he took possession of the Holy City. It was therefore against this new enemy that the Christians had to fight during the last period of the crusade (a. d. 1099). The time appointed for their departure from Antioch at length arrived. They advanced along the fertile coasts of PhcBnicia, and then through the desolate lands of Palestine, without finding much resistance 5 at length, on the seventh of June, Jerusalem lay before their eyes. No one can sufficiently describe the pious transports which, on the appearance of the Holy City, the remembrance of our Saviour's passion and death excited in every bosom, and their feelinga of indignation at beholding Jerusalem in the hands of the infidels. The army marched on in haste, driving back some parties of Sara- cens, and almost immediately made so vigorous an assault, that the town would probably have been taken at the first onset, but for want of ladders and other necessary instruments. After many had fallen on each side to no efiect, the attack was suspended^, and all the ener- gies of the crusaders were employed in constructing wooden towers, catapults, battering rams and other warlike engines. During the fabrication of these machines, a deadly drought afl^licted the army. For many days, the soldiers of the cross again experi- enced all the inconveniences of heat and thirst; and their number, already so much diminished by previous plagues, diseases, desertions, battles, and garrisons left in various places, became reduced to about forty thousand, one fourth of whom were unable to fight. The gar- rison alone of Jerusalem was more numerous than the w^hole army of the crusade; the town too was defended by strong fortifications, and supplied with all things requisite for a long resistance. So many obstacles, instead of abating, seemed rather to increase the ardor of the Christians; and, as soon as the engines were com- pleted, the attack was renewed. Early in the morning of the four- teenth of July, towers, mangonels and battering rams moved all at once against three dififerent parts of the wall, and began to cast a shower of arrows and stones, and to make a breach. Language cannot describe the violence of this first shock. Like the princes, who fought all that day from the platform of their wooden towers, the rtiultitude of the assailants fearlessly braved all kinds of perils; but, in return, the Saracens obstinately opposed them at every point, and, being abundantly furnished whh darts, boiling oil, and Grecian fire, spread ruin and dismay among the Christians. Thus passed that whole day in one of the most tremendous encounters that the crusaders had ever sustained; night came on, and the besiegers re-on- tsred their camp, burning with indignation because the city was not taken. A. D. 1095 — 1099.] FIKST CRUSADE. 249 On the following day, a new attempt was made to storm tne city During the whole morning, thousands of darts were heard continually whizzing through the air; beams and rocks, thrown by the engines, dashed against one another, and fell with a frightful crash upon the assaila'iits. Many of them had already been killed, or received deep wounds at the foot of the ramparts; the others were almost exhausted, whilst the Saracens, on the contrary, seemed to fight with renewed vigor. At that moment, Raymond and Godfrey, though placed at a great distance from each other, suddenly exclaimed that they saw a celestial warrior coming to their assistance, and giving a signal to enter the town. This instantly revived the fainting hopes of the Christians; prodigious efforts were made on all sides; the tower of Godfrey, in spite of a shower of darts and Grecian fire, was rolled forward till it touched the wall ; and, a moveable bridge being let down, two illustrious brothers, Letold and Eng-elbert of Tournai, immediately sprang upon the battlements. They were followed by the intrepid duke and other knights, who bore down upon the Sara- cens with irresistible force, and rushed after them into the very streets of Jerusalem. Tancred, with the earl of Flanders and the duke of Normandy, imitated their example in another quarter; while Raymond of Toulouse, almost at the same instant, forced his way into the town by scaling the walls. Thus was the Holy City, after exertions of the most heroic fortitude, at length taken by the Christians, on a. Friday, at three o'clock in the afternoon; a circumstance which has been carefully noticed, as coinciding with the day and hour in which our Saviour expired on the cross. Most terrible were the first moments of victory. The crusaders, exasperated by their long sufferings and by the obstinate resistance of the Saracens, and being also probably afraid of new dangers, put to the sword nearly all the garrison and inhabitants of Jerusalem. The streets, the mosques and the citadel were filled with blood, and the number of the slain is estimated by many to have been at least seventy thousand. After this bloody scene, the conquerors exhibited a spectacle more consonant to the mild spirit of Christianity. Assuming the robe of penitents, and going up to the holy sepulchre, they bedewed with their tears the spot consecrated by the sufferings and death of our Blessed Redeemer. The princes afterwards directed their attention to the appointment of a king, for the defence and preservation ot Jerusalem ; and the brave, the generous, the virtuous duke of Lor- laine, Godfrey, was chosen by unanimous consent. For the sako of the public good, he modestly accepted the distinguished task intrusted to bun; but constantly refused the diadem and other insignia 250 MODEEN" HISTORY. [PART 5.' of royalty, saying that he would never consent to wear a golden crown, where the Saviour of the world had been crowned with thorns. Scarcely was Godfrey proclaimed king, when certain information arrived of the approach of a powerful army sent by the caliph of Egypt against the crusaders. The new sovereign and his undaunted knights instantly took the determination to meet the foe half-way, which they did with as much alacrity as if they had been going to a feast. After a few days, they met the enemy in the vast plains of Ascalon, near the sea. Notwithstanding the great disparity between the opposite forces, the host of the crusade having been reduced to twenty thousand men, whilst the Egyptians and their allies amounted to about four hundred thousand, the Christians gained, with less dif ficuhy than on any former occasion, a complete victory. In a few moments, and with the loss of but a few soldiers, they strewed the plain with ninety thousand dead bodies of the Egyptian army, and dispersed the rest. The enemy, says a contemporary historian, fell under their swords, as the grass falls in the harvest before the mower;* or, to use the words of a great poet, fled at their approach, as clouds are seen flying through the air, when driven before the northern blast.f The victorious army, after gathering an immense ([uantity of spoils, returned in triumph to Jerusalem. GENERAL VIEW OF THE FIRST CRUSADE.— RETURN OF THE CRUSADERS. Such was the result of the first crusade, one of the most heroic enterprises and most brilliant expeditions of all ancient and modern history; one which, notwithstanding the accidental interference of human passions, was sustained by the loftiest and noblest motives that ever animated an army, and was at length brought to a happy issue by prodigies of valor and feats worthy of eternal remembrance We behold in it a multitude of warriors, knights and princes leaving their country and their homes, their estates and their dignities, for the sake of religion and of humanity. We see them cheerfully ex- posing themselves to all the dangers of a long and distant expedition* • Apud Michaut, Hisi. des Croisades, vol. r, pp. 475-76. I La Palestine enfin, apres tant de ravages, Vit fuir ses ennemis, comme on voit ies nuages Dans le vague des airs fuir devant I'Aquilon; Et des vents nu midi la devorante haleine N'a consume qu' a peine Leurs ossemens blanchis dans Ies champs d' Ascalon. J. B. Rousseau, Ode against the Turks, G^::^ER.VL VIEW OF THE FIRST CRUSADE. 251 imdergoing the fatigues of a painful march, the seventy of the we* iher or the excessive heat of the climate, famine, thirst and conta gious distempers; and still, almost continually fighting against the Turks, the Persians and other foes frequently too against their own imprudence, and the dangers occasioned by the quarrels of the lea- ders or the want of discipline among the troops. We see them, through the various vicissitudes of the crusade, surmounting all these obstacles, conquering all their enemies, and, at last, bringing their enterprise to a fortunate conclusion. What warlike achievement is more deserving of the admiration of posterity? Nor can it be objected, that the success of the crusaders was owing to their overwhelming numbers ; this circumstance proved rather a disadvantage, on account of the difficulty they had, to procure a sufficient quantity of provisions in an unknown country. Moreover, their number was soon greatly diminished by desertion, famine, disease and battles; so that, in the end, they were far less numerous than their enemies. It is true, many bodies of fresh troops were successively sent from Europe to their assistance; but none of them arrived, having all been destroyed before reaching Syria, eithel by starvation, or by the swords of the Turks. Hence, the success of the first crusade could be attributed to no other cause than the he- roic patience, constancy and intrepidity which the crusaders evinced, during three years, not only in a great number of particular combats, but chiefly during the sieges of Nice, Antioch and Jerusalem, and in the great battles at Dorylasum, at the Orontes and at Ascalon, against all the forces of Asia and Africa. After this last victory, which secured their conquests and crowned all their exploits, most of the crusaders thought of returning to Eu- rope. Count Raymond, however, did not proceed farther than Con- stantinople; but being invested by the emperor Alexius with princely jurisdiction over the territory of Laodicea, he retraced his steps into Syria, to take possession of this new state. Baldwin and Bohemond were already settled in their principalities of Edessa and Antioch. Robert of Flanders and Robert of Normandy reached their European dominions, and were received with great joy by their vassals and sub- jects; but the latter, having imprudently undertaken to dethrone his brother Henry I, king of England, was taken prisoner, and, being unable to recover his liberty, died after many years of severe confine- ment. Peter the Hermit also re-visited his native country, and, retir- ing to a monastery founded by himself, lived sixteen years in the practice of the most edifying virtues. As to Hugh-the-Great and Stephen of Blois, having departed from the East before the end of the crusade, shame anrl public discontent compelled them to go back to Asia, where they both fel' whilst fighting against the infidels. 252 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 5. Among the other knights who returned to France, history has not forgotten two noble twin-brothers, Stephen and Peter of Salviac, whom their own age admired as models of fraternal affection. Peter having taken the cross in the council of Clermont, Stephen, though authorized by many just reasons to remain at home, determmed to follow his brother, and to share with him all the perils of the crusade. In battles, they always stood side by side ; and they fought together at the sieges of Nice, Antioch and Jerusalem. A short lime after their return from the East, they both died in the same week, and the same sepulchre received their mortal remains ; their tomb bears an inscription transmitting to posterity the remembrance of their exploits and of their admirable friendship. KINGDOM OF JERUSALEM.— a. d. 1095—1144. Bv the death or departure of most of the crusaders, the new king dom of Jerusalem was left to be supported by the wisdom of Godfrey and the sword of Tancred, with an army of less than three thousand men. Fortunately, this want of forces did not last long; fresh bands of crusaders daily arrived from Europe, and the new sovereign was enabled, not only to defend, but also to enlarge his conquests. He at the same time compiled and published, for the improvement of his rising state, an admirable code of laws, under the title of *' Assises de Jerusalem,''^ and promoted or patronised many establishments equally beneficial to religion and social order, above all, the Hospitallers of St. John of Jerusalem, who afterwards became so much renowned as the Knights of Malta.* * Their first oridn dated from the year 1048, when certain merchants of the city of Amalpni in the kingdom of Naples, trading in the Levant, ob- tained leave from the Saracen caliph to build a house at Jerusalem for pil- grims, on the condition of paying an annual tribute. Shortly after, they founded in honor of St. John the Baptist, a church and an hospital, from which they took their name ; and being exceedingly favored by Godfrey and his successors, they enlarged their benevolent projects, and, besides at- tending the sick and pilgrims with the utmost care and assiduit)', bound themselves by a vow to defend all Christians in the Holy Land against the attacks and insults of infidels. By this noble determination, the Hos- pitallers, without ceasing to be a religious, became a military order, and a permanent body of sacred soldiery, which conferred innumerable services on the kin^s of Jerusalem and on all Christendom. The Knights Templars were instituted in 1118, also at Jerusalem, by some French and Flemish noblemen, for nearly the same purposes as the Kjiights Hospitallers, but under a plan and rule somewhat different. They derived their name from the first house which they possessed in the holy city, it being situated near the site of the temple of Solomon. The Teu- A. D. 1095—1144.] KINGDOM OF JEKUSALEM. 253 These numerous achievements were performed by Godfrey within the short space of one year. On his return from a distant expedition, he was seized with a severe illness, and died on the eighteenth of July of the year 1100, leaving behind him so unblemished a reputation of wisdom, courage and virtue, that his name, equally extolled by history and poetry, will ever live in the memory of men, as the brightest ornament of the first crusade. From his earliest years, his father, one of the greatest warriors of that age, taught him, by theory and practice, how to excel in the profession of arms. His mother, a very pious lady, impressed on his tender mind the maxims of oui holy %ith, which he ever afterwards observed, even at the head of armies, with as much regularity as if he had been in a religious house, always commencing and concluding his enterprises with acts of religion. Free from ambition and other human weaknesses, his views were always perfectly disinterested, his feelings always gene- rous, his morals always pure; and not only did he thus constantly present a perfect model of honor and virtue, but the troops also which he commanded, were, during the whole crusade, distin- guished above all others for their excellent order and discipline Never was there indeed a more admirable model of Christian chi- valry ; nor did fabulous antiquity ever picture to itself so accomplished a hero as Godfrey of Bouillon. He prepared for death with the same piety and fortitude of mind that he had evinced during life; and, in his last moments, recommended to his knights the promotion of the divine glory and the defence of the Holy Land. The Christians, overwhelmed with grief, buried him near the holy sepulchre, the pre- servation of which was so dear to his heart ; and the Saracens them selves shed tears over the tomb of a prince, whom they were obliged to acknowledge, notwithstanding the difference of religion, to have been at once the mildest and the greatest of their sovereigns.* tonic order owed its establishment to some nobles from the cities of Bremen and Lubec, who assisted at the siet2;e of Ptolemais in 1190, and was in- tended for the relief of German pilgrims. There were also three military orders founded in Spain alone, viz. the orders of St. James, Alcantara and Calatrava; and one, that of Avis, in Portugal. * To enable the reader more fully to appreciate the incomparable mei^it of Godfrey of Bouillon, we may be allowed to adduce, from authentic sources, some particular instances of his wonderful strength, generosity and piety. During the siege of Nice, a certain Turk of gigantic stature signalized himself by the immense slaughter he made of the Christians, throwing upon them large fragments of rocks from the wall, Godfrey advanced, and shooting an arrow witli a vigorous hand, sent the weapon directly to his heart, and left him dead on the battlem(.-nt.— During the stay of the army in Asia Minor, riding out on horseback in a wood, he saw a huge bear about to kill a poor soldier who was gathering sticks. Regardless of 22 254 MODERN HISTOEY. [PART 5. The first successors of Godfrey in the kingdom of Jerusaleni, were Baldwin I, his brother, and Baldwin II, his cousin. Both of them prosecuted, with great vigor, the glorious work which he had commenced; and, notwithstanding some defeats, they gained consi- derable advantages over the Saracens. Strong and important cities were successively conquered, and the Christians now possessed in Asia four extensive princedoms, Jerusalem, Antioch, Edessa and Tri- poli. The Greeks too strove continually to recover some of their former possessions in Asia Minor and Syria; and, on many occasions, under their warhke and skilful emperors Alexius and his son, John Corn nenus, success accompanied their efforts. Had the forces of the empire been at that time united with those of the Latins, the Turks might have been totally expelled from those envied regions. Unfor- tunately, mutual diffidence always kept the two powers at a distance from each other; and, what was more unfortunate still, after the death of Baldwin II in 1131, jealousy, animosity and violent dissen- sions began to arise among the Latin princes themselves. From this time, therefore, the prosperity of the Christian states his own danger, the generous duke rode up, and seizing one of the paws of the ferocious beast with his left hand, with the right plunged his sword into its body to the very hilt. — In the field, nothing could resist the edge of his sword; helmets and cuirasses were broken by it to pieces. In one of the battles which preceded the capture of Antioch, a Saracen officer of ex- traordinary size and bravery singled him out as the object of attack. God- frey, indignant at such boldness, raised himself in his stirrup, and rushing against his opponent, aimed a blow which cut the Saracen in twain. The upper part of the body fell to the earth ; but the headless trunk, being tied to the saddle, remained on the horse, and was thus carried into Antioch, where the awful sight spread terror and consternation among the Turks. In fine, such was the strength of the duke of Lorraine, that, being once re- quested by some Saracen emirs to display it in their presence, he with one blow, severed the head of a camel from the body. On the other hand, such was his moderation, that he never undertook to vindicate by force mere private rights, or to avenge personal injuries, his sword, he used to remark, being destined to spill the blood, not of Chris- tians, but of infidels, and that, only in unavoidable battles. At the taking of Jerusalem, a success owing chiefly to his intrepid valor, he no sooner saw victory declare in favor of the Christians, than he ceased fighting, laid aside his armor, and hastened to visit the holy sepulchre with the most edi- fying piety ; an example which was soon imitated by all the crusaders Mild and innocent as a lamb in the ordinary course of life, he was like a lion on the field of battle. Whilst the other princes respected him as a perfect model of Christian chivalry, the multitude loved him as the best of lathers ; and his servants being asked, before the election of a king of Je- rusalem, about his private character, could say nothing against him, except that he remained too long in church after the divine offices; in consequence of which, they complained, his dinner frequently grew cold, and became almost good for nothing. This was the oiily fault that could be found in the whole conduct of Godfrey. A. D. 1145 — 1149.] SECOND CRUSADE. 255 began to decline in the East. The Moslems scattered through the country took advantage of every new dispute among the conquerors, lo harass them whh a desuhory warfare. At length, Zenghi, sultan of Aleppo and Mosul, attacked, stormed and took Edessa in 1144; after which his son Nouradln, pursuing the same line of policy against the Christians, began to threaten their other possessions in the East. The news of these calamitous events being spread abroad, gavf occasion to the SECOND CRUSADE.— A. d. 1145—1149. Deputies had been sent in haste from Syria to Europe, for the purpose of obtaining necessary auxiliaries. Immediately after their arrival, the crusade was preached under the direction of Pope Euge- nius III, by the celebrated abbot of Clairvaux, St. Bernard, whose eloquent exhortations, supported by great miracles, had exactly the same effect Avhich the exertions of Peter the Hermit had produced fifty years before. Such was the excitement produced in France and Germany, tl at King Louis the Younger and the emperor Conrad III took the cross, with all the choicest men of both nations, so as to form in a very short time two powerful armies. The Germans alone brought to the field seventy thousand horsemen with coats of mail, besides light cavalry and the infantry. The French host consisted of a hundred thousand warriors. These forces were more than suf- ficient to repair the losses suffered by the Christians in the East, and to foil all the attempts of their enemies; but, such was the perfidy 'of the Greeks, and the want of discipline among the Latins, that no great enterprise ever failed so completely as the second crusade. Both armies started in the year 1147. The Germans, being the first to reach the neighborhood of Constantinople, began to experi- ence the ill-will of the Greeks, which, it must be confessed, they sometimes provoked by their predatory and disorderly acts. The emperor himself, Manuel Comnenus, is generally charged with having, under the veil of friendship, contrived against them a variety of perfidious practices. This at least is certain, that the crusaders, without experience against cunning, were deprived by the Greek population of their money and of the means of procuring necessary provisions; whilst, on the other hand bodies of soldiers attacked them when marching through narrow defiles. In fine, treacherous or unskilful guides led them through the wild paths of Cappadocia, where they had to endure all the horrors of a cruel famine, and at last saw themselves surrounded by the Turks. The heavy-armed 256 MODEEN HISTORY. [PART 5. Germans in vain endeavored to reach the Turkish cavalry. All their courage could not protect them against numberless foes, who fled and rallied with surprising quickness, attacked their exhausted squad- rons from the tops of the mountains, and harassed them by continual skirmishes. It became absolutely necessary to retreat towards Bithy- nia, under an incessant shower of arrows, every day adding thou- sands to the number of the slain. Conrad himself received two wounds; and when, at length, he reached the city of Nice, he could scarcely gather around him a tenth part of the knights and soldiers who had followed him from Europe. The French, under the conduct of Louis, had less perhaps to suf- fer from the Greeks, and yet were not less unfortunate than the Germans. Victorious at first on the banks of the Meander, which was crossed in spite of all the efforts of the Turks, they experienced, after a few days, a signal overthrow near the town of Laodicea in Phrygia. This disaster was brought upon the Christian army by the imprudence of a single general. On coming near a steep moun- tain, the commander of the van-guard had received orders 'from the king to halt on the summit, and there wait for the rest of the army. Disregarding this just command, the incautious man, after accom- plishing the ascent, advanced into the plain on the other side, two or three miles beyond the spot specified : in the mean time, the Turks, who had remarked the terrible mistake, occupied the hill, and thus totally intercepted the two divisions of the crusaders. Such was the perilous position of the French army, when the rear, commanded by the king in person, and as yet unaware of its danger, began to climb the mountain in full security and without any pre- caution against an attack. On a sudden, as they Were toiling up the steep acclivity, a shower of arrows from the top of the hill fell upon them, spreading indescribable confusion and dismay. Numbers were precipitated headlong down the precipice, or killed by the masses of rocks hurled against them; others, who had nearly reached the sum- mit, were forced back by the victorious enemy upon those in the rear. It was in vain that Louis, at the head of his cavalry, endea- vored to protect the infantry, and repel the Turks : the steepness of the ascent, and the fierceness of the foes rendered the contest too un- equal; men and horses fell together, and the king himself was in imminent danger of being killed; but springing upon a rock and leaning against a tree, he defended himself with his trusty sword against several Turks, till, at the approach of night, they withdrew and thus permitted him to rejoin his surviving troops. After these losses, and others which the Greeks and the Turks continued to inflict on them, both Louis and Conrad put to sea, in oixier to reach Palestine. Being arrived at Jerusalem^ all the princes A. D. 1163 — 1189.] GERMANY, ETC. 257 there present were summoned to assemble in counch ; and it was agreed thct, instead of attempting to reconquer Edessa, which had been the original object of the crusade, the Christian forces of Syria, united with the crusaders, should undertake the siege of Damascus (a. d. 1148). The monarchs immediately took the field, approached the town, drove before them the advanced bodies of Saracens, and began the siege with so great a vigor, that all entertained a moral certainty of success. All at once, jealousies and quarrels among the lords disturbed the Christian camp; former animosities were revived, and treason being added to all these evils, the siege was finally aban-' doned. At length, Conrad and Louis, full of regret and indignation, left the Latin princes of Asia to their own wretched dissensions, and departed for Europe. The ill success of the second crusade spread mourning over all the West, and was felt particularly in France, where loud complaints were lodged against St. Bernard, as the chief promoter of this fatal enterprise. The holy abbot, in a written apology, triumphantly vin- dicated his conduct, showing, with equal modesty and strength of reasoning, that, exactly as the Hebrews of old more than once failed, through their own fault, even in designs approved by God, so also, in tne present instance, the blame was to be laid, not on the promo- ter of the crusade, but on the crusaders themselves, on their disorders and want of discipline, which had drawn upon them the avenging justice of the Almighty.* Shortly after (a. d. 1153), St. Bernard departed this life, at the age of sixty-three, having deserved, by his eloquence, sanctity, immense labors for religion, and the excellency of his writings, to be numbered among the most illustrious Fathers of the Church. GERMANY AND ITALY UNDER FREDERIC I (RARBAROS- SA).— ENGLAND AND IRELAND UNDER HENRY II (PLAN TA GENET). —A. d. 1153—1189. Conrad lived three years after his return from Palestine; at his death in 1152, he left the crown to Frederic Barbarossa, his nephew, a prince of great learning, ability and courage, but proud, haughty and ambitious. Wishing, like the first Roman emperors, to be con- sidered sovereign of the whole world, he made powerful efibrts, •See St. Bernard himself, De Consideratione. lib. ir, c. r, nos. 2, 3; where he adduces the example of the Israelites who died in the desert, and especially that of the eleven tribes defeated by the tribe of Benjamin.— Judg XX, 18—27. 22* 258 MODEKN HISTOKY. [PART 5. during twenty years (1157- -1177), to oppress both the See of Roma and the small slates of Italy. His wicked attempts to raise a general schism in the Church and to place popes of his own creation in St. Peter's chair^, were defeated by the vigor of the lawful pontiff, Alex- ander III, united with the zeal evinced by the other sovereigns of Europe, particularly the kings of England and France (Henry II, Louis VII), in acknowledging Alexander as the only true pope. The exertions of the emperor towards the subjugation of the Italian republics were in the beginning more successful ; but the Milanese, whose city he had destroyed, having entered with the neighboring states into a common league to rebuild Milan and repel the violent usurper, he experienced from them a signal overthrow, which en- tirely reduced his power, and blasted his hopes with regard to the possession of Italy. This stale of things induced Frederic to come to a reconciliation with the pope and the Italians, on the conditions which they re- quired, especially that of renouncing the schism and abandoning his hostile demonstrations against the peninsula. The treaty was finally settled at Venice (a. d. 1177), to the satisfaction of all parties, the emperor being now as eager to testify his sincere and perfect submis sion to the sovereign pontiff, as he had before been in manifesting his opposition. It is not true, that, the pope, as some historians relate, set his foot on the neck of Frederic, and insulted him with these words of the Psalmist : Thou shalt walk upon the asp and the basilisk : and thou shalt trample underfoot the lion and the dragon.* The story, as has been remarked by many Catholic crilics,f and acknow- ledged by impartial Protestant historians,:}: is not in keeping with the well known meekness and moderation of Alexander III, nor founded on any credible testimony. This pretended humiliation of Frederic is indeed represented in some modern pictures; but who does not know that the liberty of fictions and symbolical representations is allowed *'to painters as well as to poets?" England, during the same period, was not less agitated than Ger- many and Italy. King Henry I, the last son of William the Con- queror, having died in 1135, the crown had been subsequently dis- puted by his daughter Matilda and his nephew Stephen of Blois, earl of Boulogne. At last, in order to reconcile the jarring interests of the two parties, it was agreed that, upon the demise of Stephen, •Psalm, xc. 13. t Feller, Did. Histor., art Alex, iii, — Natalis Alexander, Hist. Ecd ., S'Xculo XII, c. ir, art. 9. de Alex, in, — Baronius, and Hist, de I'Egl. Gall ad arm. 1177. t The Eng-Iish authors of Univers. Hist., Paris edit. 1787, book xxv, c IV, reign of Fred. I ; — or vol. xcvii, p. 190 of the historical pan, and p 191, nde. A. D. 1153—1189.] GEKMANY, ETC. 259 ihe crown snould devolve to Henry, the son of Matilda and of Geof frey Plantagenet, earl of Anjou, whom she had married after the dealh of the German emperor Henry V, her first husband. This agreement received its execution in 1154, and Henry Plantagenet ascended the throne of England under the most favorable auspices. He inherited from his father Touraine and Anjou, and from his mother Maine and Normandy. He had also received with his wife Eleanor the provinces of Poitou, Saintonge and Guienne; so that, besides England, a third part of France acknowledged his authority, and though he did homage for his continental territories as a vassal to the French king, he was more powerful than that monarch. The reign of Henry II, like most long reigns, was marked by several important events; among others, by the martyrdom of St. Thomas, archbishop of Canterbury, and by the conquest of Ireland. The invincible courage with which the archbishop defended the rights and immunities of the Church against the encroachments of the civil power, excited the animosity of the king, and so provoked the fury of four of his courtiers, that, repairing to Canterbury, they stabbed him in his own cathedral (a. t>. 1170). So atrocious a deed raised a general outcry of horror and indignation, not only against the murderers, but also against the king; nor could he otherwise avert the imminent dangers to which he now found himself exposed on all sides, than by submitting to an exemplary penance for the mur- der lately occasioned by his passionate words. Having extricated himself from these difficulties, Henry prosecuted the design which he had long since formed of adding Ireland to his dominions. Until then, this celebrated island, as we said before, had never been conquered, not even by the Danes, although their multi- plied ravages had inflicted a deep wound on religion, morality and civilization. Under the plea of rescuing the Irish from the evils that pervaded their several provinces, the English monarch obtained leave from Pope Adrian IV to enter their country, and skilfully availed him- self of the intestine feuds which divided their sovereigns, to make conquests in Ireland.* The natives, it is true, struggled long and desperately, even sometimes successfully, against the English ; but their disunion and domestic broils prevented them from obtaining any permanent advantage, and Henry succeeded in obtaining a solid footing and extensive settlements upon their territory. From that period, the British monarchs were called "Lords of Ireland," until 1542, when Henry VIII took the title of king, and Ireland was made a part of the united kingdom. The remainder of Henry's reign was spent in improving the juris- piudence of his kingdom, and in various political and military trans- * See note I. 1 260 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 5. actions with foreign princes, during the course of which he generally showed himself an able monarch, a skilful general, and a courageous soldier. His greatest trouble was the disobedient and rebedious con- duct of his sons, whose ingratitude he frequently experienced. So bitter was his grief in consequence of their last revolt, that it is sup- posed to have accelerated his death, which happened in the year 1189. FALL OF THE KINGDOM OF JERUSALEM.— a. d. 1187. Since the departure of Louis and Conrad from the East, Nouradin, without much difficulty, pursued his conquests in Syria. Even Egypt, which had long been an independent sovereignty, was sub- dued by his generals; and the Christian colonies were more and more closely surrounded by their indefatigable foes. Their danger still increased under Saladin, a Mussulman emir, who succeeded Nouradin in 1176, and who, to the possession of extensive do- minions and an alarming power, joined all the qualifications* ne- cessary to complete the ruin of a contiguous and decaying state. Talents, ambition, activity, valor; sometimes an inflexible severity and rigor; sometimes a wonderful generosity and kindness; every thing, in fine, contributed to make him the greatest hero of Islamism and the most formidable enemy of the Christians. It was in the year 1187, that he wrested from them the possession of Jerusalem and of nearly all Palestine. He first entered the pro- vince of Gahlee with eighty thousand horsemen, and cutting in pieces a body of knights who defended that part of the country, stormed and captured Tiberias, its capital, but was stopped before the citadel. In the meantime the Christian princes held a great council in Jerusalem, to deliberate on the measures to be taken for the preser- vation of the kingdom. Contrary to the advice of the most prudent, it was resolved to march out against Saladin. Accordingly, the troops of the different princes, as well as those of Guy de Lusignan, king of Jerusalem; the knights Hospitallers and Templars; the gar- lisons of the towns; in a word, all who could bear arms, were col- lected, and formed an army of fifty thousand men, who immediately marched towards Tiberias. The two opposite hosts were soon in sight of each other, and without delay prepared for battle. The whole advantage of position was on the side of the Saracens, who, occupying the summit of the hills, commanded the valleys and defiles through which the Chris- tians had to pass before coming to close contest. These, however, A. D. 1187.] FALL OF JERUSALEM. 261 continued to advance amidst a shower of darts and stones. Although the Mussulman cavalry rushed from tlie hills to oppose their passage, they still preserved their ranks; and, animated by the exhortations of the chiefs and the consciousness of their own danger, withstood unmoved the impetuous attack of the enemy. Saladin himself could not forbear admiring their intrepidity, and confessed, in one of his letters, that the Franks had fought that day with extraordinary valor. But they had more courage than strength ; destitute as they were of food and water, and debilitated by the heat of the day, even the most vigorous among them seemed prostrated by excessive weariness. Night suspended the still dubious conflict. The next day, the Saracens and Franks again mingled in the com- bat; but Saladin, as a skilful general, did not give the signal for bat- tle, till the Christian army began to languish under the rays of the meridian sun. He moreover caused the dry herbs which covered the plain, to be set on fire, so that the Christians were soon encirled by the smoke and flames which reached them on every side. In this extremity, confusion in their ranks became unavoidable; yet they con- tinued intrepid and formidable to their opponents, several of them rushing from among the clouds of smoke into the thickest ranks of the Mussulman forces. The Templars, above all, and the Knighta of St. John, by their almost supernatural efforts, would have saved the army, could it possibly have been saved; but the combined exer- tions of courage and despair every where found an insuperable ob- stacle in the multitude of their opponents, and the repeated charges of the Christian warriors served only to diminish their own numbers. At length, entirely overcome with thirst and fatigue, both their char- gers and themselves fell before the Saracens, who either butchered them on the spot or took them prisoners, together with the king of Jerusalem. A few only escaped, by cutting a passage for themselves through the enemy. Saladin did not neglect to improve the signal victory which he had gained. He directly advanced into the heart of Palestine, took pos- session of many cities and fortresses, and at last laid siege to Jerusa- lem. As this capital was now stript of its defenders, who had just pe- rished in the fatal battle of Tiberias, it could not resist the victorious arms of Saladin. Moreover, the Syriac inhabitants of the city had conspired among themselves to deliver it into the hands of the con- queror. This fact being made known, increased the well-grounded alarms of the Latins, and they hesitated no longer to propose in their own name the surrender of the place, provided honorable condiiions should be granted. After some difficuhy, Saladin complied with a part of their request; permitting them to retire unmolested, after having required from each person the payment of a certain sum. he 262 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 5. Eiitered Jerusalem in October, 1 1 87, eighty-eight years after it had been conquered by the heroes of the first crusade. There now re- mained in the possession of the Latins only three considerable towns in Syria, namely, Antioch, Tyre and TripoU. THIRD CRUSADE.— A. d. 1188—1194. The news of the fall of Jerusalem spread consternation througa all Christendom. Pope Urban III was so much afflicted, that he died of a broken hearty the western princes, who had seemed before to disregard the danger of the Christian colonies in Asia, now condemned their apathy, and determined to forget their private quarrels for the common interest of Christianity, (a. d. 1188). Three famous potentates were at that time reigning in Europe: Frederic I, emperor of Germany, Henry II, king of England, both of whom have been already mentioned in a preceding section; and Philip II, surnamed Augustus, king of France, whose abihties raised that nation to a degree of splendor and power which it had not pos- sessed since Charlemagne. Those three illustrious monarchs, toge- ther with the chief lords of their respective states, received the cross from the hands of William, the celebrated historian, and archbishop of Tyre. Statutes were enacted, to maintain good order and discipline among the crusaders more successfully than during the foregoing crusades; and, to raise money for the expedition, a council of princes and bishops ordered that every man who did not take the cross, should give the tenth part of his revenue and personal property. This tax, called Saladin^s tithe, from the terror which the alarming progress of Saladin inspired, was levied in England and France by royal commissaries. The first who set out for Asia was the emperor Frederic, at the head of one hundred and fifty thousand men. How much might be expected for the success of the crusade from such an army, under a high-spirited prince of consummate skill and valor, may be easily conceived. In fact, the career of the Germans, until the death of Frederic, was but one series of victories. The Greek emperor, Isaac Angelo, who dared to attack them, when they entered his territorv, nad the mortification to see his troops routed, his capital in great danger, and himself compelled to supply the conqueror with provisions ifor several months, and with a sufficient number of vessels to convey the crusaders to the opposite shore in Asia. The Germans continued to advance with uninterrupted success. Although many of them died before reaching Syria, the progress of their A. D. 1188 — 1194.] THIRD CRUSADE. 263 army spread terror abroad. They cut to pieces or drove before them al] the Turkish forces in their way^ defeated twice the army of the sultan of Iconium, which consisted of two or three- hundred thousand com- batants; and, taking the city itseJf at the first onset, forced the suhan humbly to sue for peace. Their discipline was equal to their bravery, and from all sides information was conveyed to Saladin of the heroic patience of the Germans in a painful and harassing march, and of their indomitable valor. If we give credit to some historians, tiie Mussulman prince was already preparing to retire towards Egypt, when a fatal circumstance unexpectedly delivered him from his most formidable enemy. After crossing Asia Minor and passing the defiles of Mount Tau- rus, Frederic, with his army, was going along a small river, which many believe to be the very same (the Cydnus) in which Alexander- tbe- Great nad well nigh to have perished. The heat of the day was excessive. The emperor, enticed by the coolness and clearness of the water, threw himself into it; but, being suddenly benumbed by the cold, he was taken out of the river in the agonies of death, or, as others say, was carried down by the rapidity of the current, and drowned. His death was more fatal to his army than the loss of a great battle could have been. Many soldiers abandoned the army of the crusade; whilst the others, proceeding towards Palestine in spite of a thousand cbstacles, saw their numbers so far diminished by famine, fatigue, distempers and repealed battles, that they were no longer able to con- tend with the hardy troops of Saladin. They therefore went to join the army of King Guy of Lusignan, who, after his deliverance from captivity, had undertaken to besiege the strong tov/n of Acre or Ptole- mais, on the Syrian coast (a. d. 1190). Various incidents had retarded the departure of the French and Eng- lish monarchs. In the interval, Henry II died, and left his place to be filled both on the throne and in the crusade by his son Richard I, surnamed Cceur de Lion. The new sovereign quickly made his last arrangements for the holy war; and, in order to avoid the dangers of a march by land, both he and Philip resolved to convey their armies to Palestine by sea. These two princes were then in the flower of their age, ardent, ambitious, brave and intrepid; but Philip was the greater king, Pvichard the greater warrior; Philip had, in a greater degree than Richard, qualities which entitle a prince to affection and esteem ; but he was inferior to him in those qualities which excite surprise and admiration. Moreover, the haughtiness and violence of Richard often procured him enemies and led him into unpleasant adventures. Although the two monarchs had sworn inviolable friendship and 264 MODERN HISTOEY. [PART 5. fidelity to each other, contrariety of views and difference of charactei soon introduced jealousies and quarrels between them, which gieatly impaired the cause of the crusade. Philip arrived first in Palestine, where the siege of Acre, owing to the obstinate resistance of the gar- rison, had already lasted nearly two years, the besiegers being them- selves besieged in their camp by the innumerable troops of Saladin, who, from the neighboring mountains, constantly watched all their motions. Bloody and frequent were the conflicts, and incalculable the losses of both armies on the field of battle j many also were car- ried off by pestilence and famine j but the arrivals of each day sup- plied the losses of the preceding. The landing of Philip diffused new vigor among the crusaders; military engines were erected, the walls were battered and undermined ; all the preparations were made for the assault; nothing was wanted but the presence of Richard, who had not yet arrived to share in the danger and glory of the attempt. This monarch had sailed from Sicily about three weeks later thao Philip, and had moreover been detained in chastising the perfidy of a Greek prince, and in subduing the rich island of Cyprus. He at last reached the Christian camp, and the siege of Acre received from his presence a new impulse. Assaults were repeatedly made; and, although the town held out for some time, it was easy to perceive that the resistance could not last much longer. The garrison, seeing their defences ruined, and all the efforts of Saladin insufficient to stop the progress of the siege, consented at last to capitulate, and the Christians took immediate possession of the city (a. d. 1191). Thus ended the siege of Ptolemais, one of the most famous in his tory; one, during which such exploits were performed by the cru- saders, as might, if well directed, have sufficed for the conquest of all Asia. Although it gave rise to some acts of cruelty and bloody retaliation, it also presented the sight of many acts of politeness and courtesy interchanged by the Latins and the Saracens. In times of truce, the contending nations mingled together in friendship; and at one moment they reciprocated good offices, while at another they met in impetuous and bloody conflict. Saladin was accustomed to send presents of excellent fruit to Kings Richard and Philip, who, in return, sent him jewels and productions of Europe. The joy which the conquest of Ptolemais spread among Christian nations, was soon damped by the news that Philip intended to withdraw from the crusade. No doubt can exist that the heahh of this monarch had been considerably impaired by a dangerous illness; but his chief motive in returning to Europe, was the disgust he had conceived at the overbearing conduct and passionate temper of Rich- ard, which ever prevented them from cordially co-operating. Under Buch circumstances, the French king seemed justifiable in retiring A. D. 1188 — 1194.] THIRD CRUSADE. 265 from the army, on the plausible plea that he would, by so doing, rather advance the cause of the crusade. Accordingly, he took his final determination, and embarked for France, leaving behind him ten thousand men with the duke of Burgundy, to support ti\e king of England. By this retreat of Philip, the chief command devolved solely on Richard. Aftex repairing the fortifications of Acre, he marched out with a considerable force, and, taking the road along the sea-shore, proceeded towards Ascalon, while vessels laden with provisions fol- lowed along the coast. The Saracens pursued the army as it marched, and harassed it by continual skirmishes, which led, how- ever, to no serious consequences. But near Antipatris, at the pas- sage of a river called Arsur, the Christians were suddenlv attacked by two or three hundred thousand Moslems, whom Saladin, in order to impede the progress of the crusade, and to avenge the loss of Ptolemais, had assembled from all parts of his empire. Richard, seeing that the battle was unavoidable, desired to make it a decisive one, and forbade his troops to commence fighting until the signal should be given. The crusaders waited for it with impatience; they could bear any thing but the shame of remaining idle in the pre- sence of an enemy who was vigorously pressing upon them. At length, some of the most intrepid knights, forgetting the king's orders, rushed against the Saracens; and, as others followed their example, in a few mom.ents the engagement became general. So furious was the shock, and so thick the dust which enveloped both armies, that several fell by the swords of their own companions, who mistook them for antagonists. Richard seemed to multiply himself, and to be in every part of the field in which the danger was greatest; and every where the enemy fled at his presence. The other chiefs under him seconded his efforts; and the Mussulmans, unable to stand so impetuous a charge, fled to the mountains, calling the crusaders a nation made of iron, and which could not be broken. In the mean time, the Christians could scarcely believe that they were so soon victorious ; nor were their doubts entirely groundless. Whilst they still occupied the spot on which they had just fought, attending to their wounded companions, the engagement was renewed by a body of twenty thousand Saracens, whom their commander, a uephew of Saladin, had rallied and led back to the charge, but with as little success as before. In fine, just as the conquerors were resuming their march, the enemy, hurried on by fury and despair, again attacked them in the rear. Richard, with only fifteen knights, ran to the spot and again routed the Moslems. Their army, tnus defeated three timee on the same day, at last abandoned the field with the loss of thirty two emirs, and several thousand of their choicest 23 266 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 5. men. Many mere yet might have fallen had they not found a timely refuge in the neighboring forests. Still, this victory, splendid as it was, procured more glory than real advantage to the crusaders. Yielding to the same sort of remissness whieti is supposed to have proved fatal to Annibal after the battle of Cannse, Richard, instead of leading his victorious troops without delay to Jerusalem, wasted his time in repairing the town of Jaffa and the castles of the neighborhood. The Saracens recovered from their terror, and Saladin had sufficient respite to fortify the Holy City m such a manner as to threaten a most vigorous resistance. When afterwards Richard, on two different occasions, approached Jerusa- lem with the intention of besieging it, the difficulty of the attempt, the inconveniences of the climate, the. disunion and jealousy of the chief crusaders, and the fears which he entertained for his European dominions, induced him on both occasions to retire. This was a source of much regret and sorrow both to the army and to the king. Whilst many persons loudly murmured against him, and withdrew from his standard, he shared in the common grief, and was indignant at himself. One day, whilst pursuing a party of Saracens as far as the hills that surround Jerusalem, and from which he could see tiie towers and steeples of the town, he burst into tears, and covered his face with his shield, thinking himself unworthy to contemplate the Holy City which his arms could not rescue from the hands of mfidels. Notwithstandmg these uncertainties and obstacles, Richard con- tinued to wage a terrible war against the Moslems, and, by splendid feats, to secure the just reputation he already enjoyed of being the greatest warrior of his age. Immediately after the second retreat of the Christians from the neighborhood of Jerusalem, Saladin burst into the city of Jaffa, and, putting to the sword many of the inha- bitants, drove the rest into the citadel, which he besieged. The Eng- lish king had now returned to Acre. At the first intelligence of the event, he sent the bulk of the army by land, while he, taking advan- tage of a favorable wind, set sail with seven gallies, and arrived in time to save the besieged garrison by clearing the town of its invaders. This, however, was not enough for the impetuous courage oi Richard. Disdaining to be confined within the walls of the liberated city, he marched out to challenge the Moslems, and was soon attacked by an army three times as numerous as his own ; but inferiority of numbers Avas of little consequence, when Richard commanded in person. He repelled all the cha^-ges of the Mussulman cavalry, put it to flight, and vanquished every champion who dared to wait his approach, among others a valiant emir, whose head, right shoulder and right arm he cut off at one blow. Seeing the brave earl of Essex A. D. 1188—1194.] THIPwD CRUSADE. 267 and his companions on the point of being slain or captured, lie rushed with his usual courage, scattered the enemy like a whirlwind, and delivered his friends from their peril.* In fine, he threw himself with such ardor among the Mussulman squadrons, that for some moments, he disappeared from the sight of his own troops. When he returned, hiS horse was covered with dust and blood; and he himself brisding with darts fastened in his shield and dress, resembled, according to an ocular witness, a cushion covered with needles. It was thought that Richard, on this occasion, surpassed his for- mer renown. His conduct drew upon him the admiration of the infidels themselves, particularly of Saphadin, the sultan's brother, who, during the very conflict, sent him a present of two Arabian horses. His sight alone filled the Moslems with terror, and made their hair stand erect. When Saladin, after the battle, reproached the Saracen officers for having fled before a single man: "Nobody,'^ answered one of them, "can withstand him; his approach is frightful, his shock is irresistible, his feats of arms are superhuman." In fact, Richard, to a mind incapable of fear, added an extraordinary degree of muscular strength, and such was the impression of terror produced by his exploits in Palestine, that, for a century after, his name was used to check the impetuosity of the Saracen horse, and quiet the restlessness of the Saracen child. Still, aU these glorious achievements were lost for the crusade. The disunion of the crusaders, which the haughtiness of the English * The readiness of the king to succor his fellow-crusaders in every danger to which they might be exposed, was repaid by their devotedness in defending his life and liberty at the expense of their own. This appeared chietly during the first sojourn of the Christian troops in the neighborhood of Jalfa. Richard, having one nay gone to the chase in a forest, stopped to sleep under a tree, but was suddenly awakened by the cries of those who accompanied him, and who saw a troop of Saracens rapidly advancing to take him prisoner. He quickly mounted his horse, and began to fight with his usual valor; but, being surrounded on all sides, he would certainly have been captured or slain, had not one of his followers, named William of Pra- toUes, drawn the attention of the foes to himself, by exclaiming "I am the king; save my life." The king, being thus enabled to make his escape, retired to Jafla; whilst William,"having delivered himself into the hands ot the Mussulmans, was conducted to Saladin, who knew how to appreciate BO noble an action, and, instead of punishing his deceit, praised his fidelity Nor was Richard ungrateful towards the generous knight; in order to res* cue him from captivity, he willingly returned ten of the principal emirs who had been made prisoners in the battle of Antipatris. This interesting event is not mentioned by Lingard; still, it cannot be well doubted, being taken from authentic documents of that epoch, and related by many excellent historians, viz. Michaut, Hist, des Croisades, vol. ir, p. 473— Maimbouro;, Hist, des Crois. vol. ir, p. 41S;— and F. U'Orl^ans, Hid. des Rcvol. D'Anglet., vol i, p. 23(/ : who all refer the fact to the end of tlic year 1191. 268 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 5. monarch contributed much to increase, tiie jealousy of the other chiefs against him, and, above ail, the repeated information which he received of great disturbances taking place in England, made him earnestly desire the conclusion of a treaty of peace, and he repeated- ly proposed it to Saladin. At last, a truce was agreed upon between them for three years and eight months. By it, the Christians were left in possession of the cities of Palestine situated along the coast, and the Saracens kept the other towns with Jerusalem, under con- dition of granting to the pilgrims free access to the holy sepulchre. Such was the result of the third crusade, which had seen the most powerful monarchs, and, as it were, all the forces of Europe fighting against those of Asia during three years in succession. It led, indeed, to the surrender of Acre, a town of considerable importance for the Christians : and to the conquest of the island of Cyprus, which Richard gave to Guy of Lusignan, the disappointed king of Jerusa- lem, but it did not recover the Holy City, the real and professed object of the crusade. Splendid and glorious were the personal exploits of Richard ; still his vacillating conduct showed that he possessed neither all the talents of a great general, nor that constancy of mind so necessary for the success of any arduous enterprise. The superiority in both these particulars ought certainly to be given to Saladin, who, notwithstanding some defeats, finally remained master of Jerusalem and of the far greater portion of the Holy Land. The English monarch, having nothing more to do in Palestine, sailed from Acre in October, (1192); the inhabitants wept at his departure, nor could he suppress his own emotion. Many and dis- astrous were the-adventures which attended his voyage. The vessel in which he sailed being wrecked on the coast of the Adriatic sea, the king resolved to cross Germany incognito and in the guise of a pilgrim, to avoid the snares of his numerous enemies; but even this precaution could not save him from the disasters which he feared. Being recognized at Vienna in Austria, Duke Leopold, whom he had cruelly offended during the siege of Ptolemais, arrested him, and confined him as his prisoner in a strong castle. The royal captive was afterwards delivered into the hands of the German emperor, Henry VI, also his enemy, who kept him in prison, till a large sum of money was sent from England for his ransom. At length, Rich- ard was allowed to pursue his journey without further molestation. At Antwerp, he found his fleet; and, after a few days navigation, landed on the shores of England. The recollection of his recent exploits and misfortunes having obliterated the remembrance of his former faults, he was received with universal joy, after an absence of more than four years (a. d. 1 194). A. D. 1195—1198.] FOUKTH CRUSADE. 269 FOURTH CRUSADE.— A. c. 1195—1198. Saladin did not long enjoy the satisfaction of having maintained his superiority in Asia, and particularly in the Holy Land, against the combined efforts of the European princes. One year had scarce- ly elapsed since the conclusion of his treaty with Richard, when death terminated his career. Finding his end approaching, he com- manded the shroud in which his body was to be enveloped, to be carried through the streets, and an emir to cry out with a loud voice: " Behold what Paladin, the mighty conqueror of the East, will carry away with him of all his vast dominions." He died at Damascus (a. d. 1194) — a monarch in whose character, although not altogether blameless, humanity and justice were more conspicuous than in any other Mussulman conqueror. The death of this great sultan was followed by civil dissensions among the Moslems, which might have become very detrimental to iheir power, had the Christians been more united among themselves. The sons of Saladin seized upon such portions of their father's empire as they could obtain ; but his brother Saphadin, otherwise called Malek-Adel, finding himself equally beloved and respected by the soldiers, waged war against these young princes, and took pos- session of the greater part of Syria. This was a favorable opportunity for another crusade. Pope Ce- lestine III exhorted all Christendom to improve it by a generous effort, and to take up arms again in favor of Jerusalem. In England and France, his exhortation failed, as Richard and Philip were now too actively engaged in war against each other, to quit their do- minions; but in Germany, so many persons offered themselves, at'ier the example of the emperor Henry VI, that three armies were quickly assembled for this new expedition. Henry, however, with the most numerous of the three, did not proceed farther than Sicily^ where he put an end to the power and race of the Norman sove- reigns. The other two armies reached Palestine, and gained at first great advantages over Saphadin. Unfortunately, new quarrels Grno..g the leaders impeded their progress, and the news of the em- peror's death induced them to return to Europe, fo/ the election of his successor (a. d. 1198). Thus the hope which had l)een enter- tained witn regard to the recovery of the Holy Land, was again dis- appointed- 23* 270 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 5. FIFTH CRUSADE. POaNDATION OP THE LATIN EMPIRE OF CONSTANTINOPLE. A. D. 1199—1204. Another crusade soon followed, productive of the most singular and unexpected effects. Although the ill success of the foregoing expeditions had greatly abated the enthusiasm for the holy war, still the letters of Pope Innocent III and the eloquent exhortations of a zealous priest, called Foulques de Neuilly, soon revived in many generous hearts an arden<^ desire of reconquering Jerusalem. None, it is true, of the crowned heads, owing to their fear of each other, engaged in this new attempt to hberate Palestine; hut it was vigor- ously pursued by several Italian and French lords, under the com- mand of Boniface, marquis of Montferrat, and Baldwin, earl of Flanders. These new crusaders determined, as Kings Richard and Phihp had formerly done, to convey their armament to Palestine by sea. A treaty was entered into with the republic of Venice, by which the Venetians agreed, not only to supply the crusading army with ves- sels at a stipulated price, but even to share in the enterprise. The fleet was soon ready; but the unexpected departure of several among the barons and knights by a different way, greatly perplexed the others, who, although they melted down their plate, could not make up the sum required. In this distress, the famous doge Henry Dan- dolo opened a new negotiation, and offered, not only to unite with the French in the crusade, but also to wait for the entire payment of their debt till the end of the expedition, provided they would first aid the Venetians in reconquering the city of Zara, in Dalmatia, which had been taken from the republic some time before by the king of Hungary. The offer was accepted, and Zara being vigorously at tacked both by land and sea, surrendered at discretion (a. d. 1202). It now seemed that nothing more could retard the voyage of the crusa- ders ; but just at this juncture, there came from another quarter a re- quest of an extraordinary nature, and promising the happiest results ; this request again diverted them from their former design, and gave a new direction to the operations of the crusade. Isaac, the emperor of Constantinople, had lately been expelled from the throne by his brother Alexius, who moreover deprives] him of his sight, and confined him in a prison. Another Alexius, the son of the dethroned monarch, having made his escape from thf- hands of the usurper, went through the various countries and courts A. D. 1199—1204.] FIFTH CRUSADE. 271 of Europe, to excite compassion and obtain assistance for his unfor- tunate father. The French and the Venetians had not yet sailed from Zara, when the deputies of that young prince, who were soon followed by himself, arrived in their camp. He promised with an oath, if they would expel the usurper and replace Isaac on the throne, to give two hundred thousand marks of silver, to facilitate the conquest of the Holy Land, to maintain there, during his life, five hundred knights for its defence, and to reestablish among the Greeks the authority of the Roman Pontiff. Notwithstanding the tempting promises and engaging manners of young Alexius, his proposal did not meet the unanimous approbation of the crusaders, many rejecting at once the idea of being again diverted from the main object of their enterprise. Still, the offers were so advantageous in themselves, and seemed moreover so well calculated to further the ultimate result which they wished to obtain, that most of the barons readily accepted them on the terms proposed. Accordingly, the fleet, having on board Prince Alexius, set sail from Zara; and, after a short and prosperous passage, came within sight of Constantinople (a. d. 1203). A siege often days was sufficient to reduce that celebrated capital After many skirmishes, a general attack was agreed upon by the La tins, and took place on the seventeenth of July, both by land and sea the French on the one side, and the Venetians on the other, seeming to rival each other on that day for the prize of undaunted courage. Still, they would perhaps have been overcome by numbers, had not Henry Dandolo set them an example of heroic boldness and intre- pidity. Although at the age of more than eighty years, and almost blind, he ordered, with terrific threats in case of disobedience, that he should be landed, with the great standard of St. Mark before him. In compliance with the command, his vessel was immediately pushed to the shore, close under the walls; the rest of the fleet followed; and, in spite of darts, stones and Grecian fire thrown by the besieged, twenty-five towers were soon in the power of the assailants. After this, Dandolo, without loss of time, flew to the assistance of the French who were opposed by innumerable forces. The Greeks re- treated; consternation spread through Constantinople; and the usur- per, more terrified than any of the citizens, fled during the night irom the town, carrying along with him his treasures and the insig- nia of the imperial dig-nity. The inhabitants opened their gates to the conquerors. The old emperor was delivered from his prison, reascended the throne with universal applause, and ratified the promises made by his son to the Latins. But it was an easier task to confirm them by word and writing, than to carry them into execution. Tiie heavy tribute 272 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 5. which Isaac and Alexius, in order to pay iheir debt, were obliged to impose on the citizens; a dreadful conflagration, which raged durnig eight days in the capital ; and a variety of other incidents, excited public hatred and contempt against the two emperors ; whilst the crusaders also were indignant at their delay in carrying out the treaty. The most dangerous of their enemies was a young lord of the court, known under the surname of Murzuphlis, who secretly aspired to the supreme power. Whilst he deceived the sovereigns by an exte- rior show of zeal for their interest, he left nothing untried to incense the multitude both against them and against the Latins. In fine, the unwary princes having fallen victims to his intrigues and perfidy, he was acknowledged emperor in their place, and inimediatply prepared to oppose the efforts which, he foresaw, the crusaders would make, to punish his crime and avenge the death of those whom they had taken under their protection. In fact, the intelligence of the murder of the young Alexius had no sooner reached their camp, than they determined to proclaim again an open war, and attack the imperial city a second time. They knew well the danger of the attempt, much greater indeed then^ from the fury of the Greeks, than it was before; but so little effect had this knowledge on the minds of those intrepid warriors, and so much did they rely on their valor and their swords, and on the protection of heaven, that, even before going to the assault, they agreed among themselves upon the measures to be taken for the preservation and government of their conquest. Not to divide their forces, they conducted the whole expedition by sea, and directed it against one single part of the city. The galleys approached the wall, and made a furious attack, which lasted until three o'clook in the afternoon, with more courage however than suc- cess on the part of the assailants; for they every where met so deter- mined a resistance, that the multitude of their opponents and the ravages of the Grecian fire compelled those who had landed, to re- turn to their vessels and withdraw to a distance. Still, instead of lo- sing courage, they seemed inspired with redoubled ardor. Three days were spent in repairing the injured machines, and m consulting about a new attempt. The leaders of the army judging that a single ves- sel did not contain a sufiScient number of troops to effect a successful assault on any particular spot, it was resolved to join two vessels for each point of attack. On the fourth day (12th of April 1204), the assault was recom- menced, and the conflict carried on during the Avhole morning with the same animosity as before, and also with some advantage on the side of the Greeks. In an instant, however, the fortune of the day was changed. About noon, a wind arising from the north, made the A. D. 1199 — 1204.] FIFTH CRUSADE. 273 vessels approach nearer to the wall; two of them lashed together, called the Pilgrim and the Pcwadisc, were brought close to one of the towers, and by means of a moveable bridge, two intrepid warriors, Peter Alberti, a Venetian, and Andrev/ d'Urboise, a French knight, sprang upon the battlement. The others followed in multitudes ; three gates were at the same time broken by the battering rams, and the whole host of the crusaders entered the town, driving before them innumerable troops of soldiers and inhabitants, who fled at theii ap- proach like so many flocks of sheep. One Latin put to flight a hun- dred, or even a thousand Greeks ; and such was the terror which seized the vanquished, that they imagined a French cavalier whom they saw advancing at the head of his troop, to be fifty feet high. The principal contriver of so many evils, Murzuphlis, after some faint efforts to rally his citizens, made his escape from the city during the night. The following day, Constantinople was pillaged; and, although the Greeks had time to conceal a great part of their most valuable effects, the conquerors collected an immense booty in gold, silver, jewels and other precious articles. Undoubtedly, several acts of vio- lence, notwithstanding the strict prohibitions of the chiefs, were com- mitted by a victorious soldiery; still, implicit credit ought not to be given to the partial and virulent testimony of exasperated Greeks. From other and more impartial accounts, it appears that there was much less actual bloodshed than either the particular circumstances of the victory or the dangerous position of the conquerors might naturally have occasioned; and that many noble and generous ac- tions were witnessed on that occasion, notwithstanding the cupidity and licentiousness which ever accompany the sacking of a great city. Thus was Constantinople, that proud capital, well fortified and well defended on every side, containing one million of inhabitants and upwards of two hundred thousand fighting men, taken twice, within a short interval, by a handful of warriors whose whole num- ber was at most twenty thousand. In consequence of the agree- ment entered into previously to the first assault, twelve commissaries, six French and six Venetian, proceeded to the election of an emperor. After mature deliberation, their unanimous votes proclaimed for that high dignity, Baldwin, earl of Flanders, who possessed it only one year, and thus completed that resemblance with Godfrey of Bouillon, which he had in every other respect, in valor, ability and virtue. Dandolo, Boniface, and other leaders of the crusade, received pro- portionate and splendid preferments in the newly conquered empire, as a just recompense for their glorious exploits and services ; whilst the survivors of the late reigning families fled to Asia, and founded 274 MODEEN HISTORY. [PART 5. there two new states, which they called the empires of Nice and Trebisonde. It is -Out natural to presume that such extraordinary and compli- cated events, did not permit the heroes of the fifth crusade to pursue their former project of delivering Jerusalem. They were now too much occupied in defending their new possessions, to think of any other conquest; nor was it even without great difficulty that the Latin empire of Constantinople could subsist for some time. Suc- cessively deprived, by death, of its magnanimous defenders, and surrounded by enemies, it possessed but a precarious existence, and, after a short duration of fifty-seven years, again fell into the power of the Greeks. WARS THROUGHOUT EUROPE— a. d. 1200—1226. Whilst some French and Italian nobles Avere dividing among themselves the spoils and the provinces of the Greek empire, the flames of war were kindled throughout the various parts of western Europe. The Christian inhabitants of Spain had, it is true, very little share in the crusades undertaken by the other nations of Chris- tendom; but they were themselves engaged in a permanent crusade against the Moors, and the whole peninsula was a theatre of almost uninterrupted warfare. During the course of the twelfth century, as well as in the preceding ages, both parties had alternately gained vic- tories and suffered defeats, the loss, however, being more frequently on the side of the Moors. In the beginning of the thirteenth century, the conflict between the two nations assumed a more threatening and formidable aspect than it had done for a long time. The Miramolin (commander-in-chief) of the Spanish and African Moslems was now making immense preparations, to crush at once all the Christian kingdoms of Spain. The king of Castile, Alfonso IX, who was par- ticularly exposed to the gathering storm, called to his assistance the knights of France and Portugal, together with the kings of Arragon and Navarre (D. Pedro II — Sanchez VII), to oppose the common enemy; and Pope Innocent III willingly extended to their army the privileges usually granted to the crusaders. Their combined forces cousisted of about one hundred thousand warriors; those of the Miramolin, the most numerous that Spain had ever beheld, amounted to four hundred and fifty thousand combatants, one-third of whom were cavalry. The confederates came in sight of the Moors near a ridge of mountains called Sierra-Morenaj which separates Andalusia from A. D. 1200 — 1226.] WARS THROUGHOUT EUROPE. -275 Castile. It was just behind these mountains that Mohammed, the Saracen prince, had encamped his army in a strong position, at the entrance of a vast plain called JYavas de Tolosa. When the Chris- tians arrived at the ridge, they found no other way to pass it than a narrow defile occupied by the Moors, in which, according to an expression of the king of Castile, one thousand men could have stopped all the warriors of the world ; fortunately, a peasant of the country discovered to the leaders a safer and easier road, which con- ducted them to the top of the mountain. Mohammed, quite surprised at their sudden appearance, first sent bodies of troops to dispute the spot with them, and aftewards endeavored to bring on a general bat- tle, whilst he justly supposed they had not yet recovered from the fatigues of a long and difficuh march. The Christians defeated both his attempts, repelled the skirmishers, and took, during two days, the rest which they needed. On the third day, the sixteenth of July (a. d. 1212), they advanced in good order against the enemy. The Miramolin appeared on a height, surrounded by his bravest troops, and even by a large iron chain, which was to be broken before the assailants could reach his person. The onset and the resistance were equally furious and ob- stinate; and, notwithstanding the prodigies of valor performed by the kings of Castile, Arragon and Navarre, the victory remained uncer- tain nearly the whole day. A last and desperate effort made by the Christian knights spread confusion and terror among the infidels: the intrepid king of Navarre first of all broke the iron chain ; the whole army rushed in, and the Saracens were either cut in pieces or dispersed in every direction. Their haughty sovereign, who had anticipated an easy victory and the conquest of all Christendom, fied in despair, having lost from one to two hundred thousand men , whereas the Christians did not lose more than one hundred and twenty-five in all, and even, according to several grave historians, not more than twenty-five or thirty soldiers.* For this amazing success the conquerors acknowledged themselves indebted to a special inter- ference of God in their favor, and returned Him their solemn thanks on the field of battle. If this great victory did not entirely prostrate, it at least considera- bly weakened the power of the Saracens in Spain. Nearly the whole of this century was for them an uninterrupted series of disas- ters. On one side, the brave and pious king Ferdinand III, of Cas- * See Roderic Tolet. lib. vixr;— King Alf. Epist. ad Inn. iir ; — Hurter, Hist, du Pape Innocent IH, vol. iii, pp. 192— 204;— F. D'Orl^ans, Hist, dcs Revol. d'Esp. ad ann. 1212; — Fleury, Hist. Eccles. b. Lxxvir, n. 11 ;— Di!sormeaux, Jlbrege Chronol. de VHist. d'Esp. vol. rr, p 112; — in fine; Univers. Hist. vol. lxx, pp. 493 and C56. 276- • MODERN HISTORY. [PART 5. tile, took from them Cordova, Seville, and many other important citiesj on the other, James I, king of Arragon, subdued the Balearic Isles, with the two kingdoms of Murcia and Valentia, and added them to his own dominions. Not less important were the military transactions which the samo period witnessed in Germany, France and England. The death of the German emperor Henry VI, at the age of thirty-two years, had left the imperial crown to be disputed by two mighty competitors, Philip, duke of Suabia, and Otho, duke of Saxony. The latter seemed to prevail for a time, but was himself finally obliged to yield the sceptre to young Frederic II, son of the late emperor Henry, and grand-son of Frederic Barbarossa, whom he afterwards imitated and even surpassed in his reputation for ability, his ambition, his pride, his success, and his subsequent disasters. France also and England had been engaged, ever since the third crusade, in a vigorous war against each other. By Richard and Philip Augustus, formerly intimate friends, and now obstinate rivals, the contest was carried on for several years with alternate success ; but the death of the lion-hearted king gave the French monarch great advantage. He then conquered Normandy and several other conti- nental provinces of the British crown. John, surnamed Lack-land, the successor of Richard, not having been able to preserve, seemed determined at least to recover his transmarine possessions. For this purpose, and for other causes, a powerful confederacy was formed by him, the emperor of Germany, the count of Boulogne, and the earl of Flanders, against France alone, which was obliged to divide its forces, in order to oppose so many enemies. Part of the troops were sent to the western provinces, where John had effected a land- ing; his progress, rapid in the beginning, was suddenly arrested by the arrival of Louis, the son of Philip, who even compelled him to retire, with a great loss both of men and baggage. But the final result of the campaign was to be decided in the North. There, after gaining a naval victory against tlie French fleet, the English forces having landed under the command of the earl of Salisbury, were joined by their allies, and formed with them an army of more than one hundred and fifty thousand men, who hastened to invade the French territory. To this overwhelming multitude Philip could oppose only fifty thousand combatants; but inferiority of numbers was compensated by the devotedness and bravery of his knights, the choicest men of the nation. Thetwo armies met at Bou vines, an obscure village between Lille and Tourney. The Fren -, ■ took a position which obliged the enemy to face, during the whole engagement, the dust, the wind, and the rays of the sun which disadvantage greatly contributed to I A. D. 1200—1226.] WARS THROUGHOUT EUROPE. 277 his entire defeat. The conflict, however, was long and obstinate and so furious were the efforts of the combatants, that the chief lead ers themselves, Philip and Otho, ran great risk of their hves. At last, the army of the confederates was broken, routed on all sides, and pursued with dreadful slaughter. The emperor made his escape; the other generals were taken prisoners ; and the French king had thus the happiness, not only to save his kingdom from impending ruin, but also to obtain a lasting superiority over all his enemies. (a. d. 1214). The battle of Bouvines having annihilated all the hopes of King John with regard to France, he set sail for England, where a still more disgraceful trial awaited him at his very arrival. The excesses of his passionate temper and dissolute life had previously excited much indignation against him, he now became, in consequence of his late disasters, an object of contempt to his own subjects. The English barons took secret measures to form a powerful league against him, and having succeeded in assembling a large body of men, asked of the king, with threats of a civil war, the revival of those privileges which Edward the Confessor had granted to the nation, but which had been more or less disregarded by the generality of his successors. John at first positively refused ; afterwards, seeing the numerous forces of the barons, he yielded to their request, and even granted more than had been originally asked, by subscribing an authentic act which comprised all his grants, and which, under the name of Magna Charta, was for centuries looked upon as the basis of the British constitution. The king, however, soon appeared dissatisfied with regulations that had been extorted from his fears, and he availed himself of the first opportunity to declare that he would not sufler himself to be led by them in the government of his kingdom. This produced a second civil war, in which the English lords applied to the French monarch for assistance, and offered the crown to his eldest son. Accordingly, Louis crossed the sea, and, with the help of his pfartisans, was acknowledged king both in London and in many provinces, with hopes of subduing in a short time the other parts of the realm. But the unexpected death of John, whom a violent fever carried off after an illness of a few days, totally changed the face of affairs; patriot- ism was revived in the hearts of the Enghsh lords ; many of them gradually abandoned Louis, and rallied around young Henry, son of the deceased monarch. He was crowned at Gloucester, and the care of his person, together with the title of guardian of the kingdom, was intrusted to the valor and fidelity of the earl of Pembroke, otherwiso catled earl-marshal (a. d. 1216). This faithful atid able minister immediately took the best measures 24 278 MODEKN mSTOKY. [PART 5. to secure the crown on the head of his royal ward. To discrMlitthe French party, reports of depredations committed by the foreigners and of their contempt for the natives, were industriously circulated; all Englishmen who should return to the allegiance of their lawful sove- reign, were promised the restoration of their former liberties ; a numerous host of brave warriors was quickly assembled, and a reli- gious character was given to the expedition. As soon as Pembroke saw his followers animated with his own ardor, he marched to Lin- coln, and, surprising the main body of the hostde forces, gained a complete victory. Shortly after, a French fleet, carrying auxiliary troops, was also defeated between Dover and Calais. By this sudden destruction of his resources, Louis, who had until then kept London and several of the barons on his side, was compelled to give up all hope of success. A negotiation was instantly opened, and the terms having been settled without much difficulty, Louis immediately returned to France, leaving the quiet possession of the British crown to his young competitor. He himself succeeded his father Philip on the Frencn throne (a. d. 1223). Having occupied it three years, during which he showed himself well worthy of it by his lion-like courage and exemplary virtue, he died in 1226, whilst returning from an expedition against the Albigenses. These Albigenses, so called from the city of Alby in the south of France, where their numbers appeared greater than in any other place, were sectarians, whose principles, taken from the ancient Manicheans and Gnostics, aimed equally at the destruction of reli- gion, social order, and humanity. Shocking and frightful were the ravages, depredations and cruelties which they committed during a part of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, pillaging, burning and killing, wherever they found any resistance to their abominable tenets. The lives of their fellow-mortals, as well as the most sacred objects of religion, were a mere sport for them ; and, during a long time, every attempt to check the growing evil proved ineffectual.* After many- years spent to little purpose by holy missionaries, such as St. Bernard, St. Dominic, and others, in endeavoring to convert these wretched and infuriated people by means of patience, meek- * These facts are incontestably proved by the Hist. Alhig. of Peter des Vaux de Cernay, a contemporary author; — by the letters of Pope Innocent III; — the 27th Canon of the third general council of Lateran, in 1179; — the 20th Can. of the council of Avignon, in 1209; — etc. etc. On the errors, crimes, and the whole history of these sectarians, see Natalis Alexander, Disseriationes in Hist. Ecdcs. scecuI. xii, cap. iii. art. I, vol. vir, p. 65; — Berault-Bercastel, Hist, de fEgl. I. xxxix; — F. Fon- tenay, Hist.de VEglise Gallic. I. xxix, xxx; — Berojier, D/c/io7i. de Thiolog art. Alhigeois:, — Butler, Livez of the Saints, Ath of August \ — Hurtor, Hisi dupape Inn. iii, /. xiv, etc. A.D. 1205 — 1227.] CONQUESTS OF GENGHIS KAN. 279 ness, in'itruction and prayer, it was unanimously thought necessary to oppose coercive measures to their excesses and disorders. Troops were raised as for a crusade, and marched against the Albigenses under the command of Count Simon de Montford, a general of great energy and courage, who, being invested with full military and civil power, pursued with unrelenting vigor, and sometimes extraordi- nary severity, those desperate sectarians, whom it was not possi- ble otherwise to subdue. Sometimes abandoned by a considerable portion of his troops, he however went on, and gained signal advan- tages over the numerous forces of his opponents, whether Albigenses or their allies. His death, which happened in 1218, permitted them, it is true, to regain for a time their former ascendency ; but, being again defeated by King Louis VIII, their party was finally crushed during the minority of Louis IX. CONQUESTS OF GENGHIS-KAN IN ASIA.— a. d. 1205—1227. During the first part of the thirteenth century, Asia was, like Europe, the theatre of astounding revolutions. Its whole centre had been, for many ages, occupied by numberless tribes scarcely known to the civihzed world, and designated by the common name of Tar- tars. The Moguls, one of those tribes, were confounded with the others in the same obscurity, when Temujin, or Genghis-Kan, ren- dered them for ever famous by his conquests, and by the foundation of an empire which, comprising in extent no fewer than thirteen of fourteen millions of square miles, was probably the greatest unbroken empire that ever existed. Temujin was the son of a Mogul prince, and had been raised with great care under the direction of a skilful minister. The death of his father and the rebellion of his subjects compelled him to fly for safety to the court of the chief sovereign of his nation. There he began to display that wonderful talent and activity, that consummate prudence and skill both in war and government, which afterwards raised him so much above all the other prmces of Asia. But, in the beginning of his public career, he seemed to experience nothing but contradictions. The superiority of his merit soon excited the jealousy of many persons at court, and even that of the sovereign himself, to such a degree, that a powerful league was formed against Temu- jin, who endeavored in vain, by measures of prudence, to frus- trate its effects. Seeing his efforts useless, he on his side raised a numerous army, attacked his enemies, and gained a decisive victory, 280 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 5. which, being supported by other advantages, united under his sway all the Mogul tribes. He no sooner found himself master of vast dominions, than he re- solved to confirm his authority by the public homage of all his vas- sals, and to extend still farther the boundaries of his empire. The former of these designs he accomplished in 1205, by convoking a general assembly of the Tartar princes subject to his power; and is was on this occasion that he received the name of Genghis-Kan, which means king of kings. The latter project was the object of his attention during the whole of his reign, which lasted twenty-two years; and China and Persia, with many other countries, after hav ing been the oNjects of his ambitious attacks, became the reward ol his gigantic exertions. It was particularly in the two regions just mentioned, that the war conducted by Genghis-Kan spread all its horrors and ravages. Nei- ther an immense wall formerly built by the Chinese to protect their frontiers from invasion, nor any other bulwark and means of resis- tance, could save a flourishing empire from the attacks of those num- berless hordes of Tartars, whom warlike enthusiasm and thirst for plunder rendered superior to ail sorts of dangers and fatigues. The long struggle which the natives maintained against these terrible foes, only served to increase their misery ; a considerable part of their country was subdued, and Genghis-Kan estabhshed in it a governor under the title of king. This event was followed by the conquest, or rather devastation of Persia, India, Karazm and other extensive regions. The Sultan of Persia, Mohammed, having had the imprudence to provoke the in- dignation and resentment of the Mogul conqueror, Genghis-Kan marched against him at the head of seven hundred thousand men, commanded by himself and by his four sons. The rapidity of his conquests cannot be better expressed than by comparing it to a furious and destructive torrent which sweeps every thing before it with irresistible fury. Mohammed, with five hundred thousand Per- sian and Carazmian soldiers, endeavored in vain to stop the progress of the Tartars; he had the misfortune to see all his efforts baffled, his troops constantly overcome, his most flourishing cities sacked and destroyed by the conquerors, and himself completely overthrown in a general battle on the banks of the river Jaxartes, near the Cas- pian Sea, where he lost one hundred and sixty thousand men. This defeat reduced Mohammed, with all his family and kingdom, to the last extremity. Every thing was destroyed with fire and sword in those unhappy countries, and millions of the inhabitants perished; a number which will not appear incredible, if we consider that there uever was perhaps a greater scourge of nations than Genghis-Kan, A. D. 1217 — 1244.] SIXTH CRUSADE. 281 and that, according to some historians, the whole number of towns laid waste or destroyed by his armies may be supposed to amount to fifty thousand.^ This terrible conqueror was preparing a new expedition against the remotest parts of Asia, when he died (a. d. 1227), at the age of sixty- five years, leaving several sons, the heirs as well of his enterprising and warlike spirit, as of his vast dominions. Two of them particu- larly, Octay and Toley, led the Moguls to new victories. Tliose pro- vinces of China which had, till then, escaped the Tartar yoke, were subdued like the rest. At the siege of Pekin, the capital, the Tartars employed machines which cast enormous fragments of rock; while the Chinese, on their side, darted iron lubes filled with a certam powder, which, bursting upon the besiegers with a frightful explosion, con- sumed every thing within a circumference of two thousand feet. These dreadful effects, so similar to those produced by gunpowder, seem to show that it was known and used in China, long before its discovery in Europe. In sixteen days and nights, a million of per- sons, Chinese and Tartars, perished at that siege. From the western frontier of Tartary, Batu-Kan, a grand-son of Genghis-Kan, carried the devastation of war through Russia and Po- land as far as Hungary and Austria; fortunately, his passage was more like a transient storm' than a permanent conquest. — Another Mogul chieftain, named Hulagu, took Bagdad in the year 1258, and thus put an end to the power of the Arabian caliphs; but having crossed the Euphrates in pursuit of new conquests, his troops were defeated and repulsed by the sultans of Syria and Egypt. This how- ever v/as but a trifling check for the successors of Genghis-Kan, and they long after continued powerful in all central Asia. SIXTH CRUSADE.— A. r. 1217—1244. The fifth crusade having failed to recover the Holy Land, a new one was earnestly desired by the Christians of Syria ; and reports were diligently circulated that they stood in great need of speedy as- sistance. However, the necessary succor, owing to a variety of ob- stacles, was long delayed; when, at length, fifty thousand children almost simultaneously enlisted in the holy cause, in France and Ger- many. To them, they maintained, Almighty God had reserved the * See for the destructive conquests of Geni:;his-Kan, Univ. Hist., end of 46th and beginning of 47th vol. — Anquetil, Precis de VHisi. Univ., vol. iv, pp. SjJ2 — 396; — Michaut, Hist, des Croisades, vol. iv, pp. Ill — 121; — Le- oeau. Hist, du Bas Emp. vol. xxi, pp. 412 — 424. 24* 282 MODERN HISTORY. [PAET 5. .lonor or rescuing his Holy City from the hands of infidels. Undei this illusion, many embarked at Marseilles, but either perished during the voyage by shipwreck near the shores of Italy, or were betrayed to the Saracens, among whom several suffered martyrdom. Others, after incredible difficulties, reached Genoa; but the Genoese wisely commanded them to evacuate their territory. They then returned to their homes ; and, although a great number died on the road, many arrived in safety, and escaped the fate which had overtaken the first bands of their young fellow adventurers. When Pope Innocent heard of this crusade, he is reported to have said: *'^ While we are asleep, these children are awake." At length, his untiring exertions, and those of his successor Honorius III, suc- ceeded in raising numerous troops of crusaders in France, England, Holland, Germany and Italy. As all were not ready at the same time, but set out in different years, from different points, and for dif- ferent places, this circumstance produced, not one expedition only, but a series of expeditions, making the sixth crusade very long and complicated. Some went to Portugal, where they aided the Chris- tians of that country in conquering the Moors in the great battle of Alcazar (a. d. 1218). Others, under the command of the kings of Hungary and Cyprus, arrived in Palestine, where, after gaining some advantages, they met with disappointment and disasters instead of success. The king of Cyprus died at Tripoli, on the coast of Syria; and the king of Hungary returned to his kingdom. This circumstance, and the continual arrival at Ptolemais of fresh sup- plies, left John of Brienne, the titular king of Jerusalem, more at hberty to direct as he thought proper the military operations of the crusaders. He resolved to attack Egypt, then the most valuable portion of the Mussulman empire, and the store-house, as it were, from which they drew continually new supplies of provisions, ammunition and troops. Accordingly, the Christian army sailed from Ptolemais, and laid siege to Damietta, which was the key of Egypt on that side. The town, well supplied and ably defended, resisted eighteen months, and was not taken until, of seventy thousand inhabitants, scarcely three thou- sand remained alive. So great was the terror which both the siege and the capture of Damietta spread among the Mussulmans, that they repeatedly offered to restore Palestine, in order to save the rest of their dominions. John of Brienne and many of the other chiefs were of opinion that the offer should be accepted; but the strong opposition of several influential persons, who, under the impression that the moment had come in which the Saracen power was to be overthrown, displayed more valor than prudence, caused it to be altogether rejected. A. D. 1217— 12-1-i.] SIXTH CRUSADE. 283 The army was therotbre commanded to advance towards Cairo^ the capital of Egypt. \ few days march brought the Christians to a spot where the Nile A\as to be crossed; but they were greatly dis- appointed at seeing the whole plain on the other side occupied by an incredible multitude of soldiers, whom the Sultan Meledin (JMalek Kamel) had assembled, to oppose the progress of his enemy. There was not a sufficient number of vessels to attempt the passage m presence of such a force, with any probable hope of success. Provi- sions, too, began to be scarce among the crusaders; and to complete their misfortune, the rise and inundation of the Nile reduced them to the necessity of retracing their steps towards Damietta. The signal for the retreat was given ; but the exhausted troops, incessantly pursued by the Mussulman cavalry, lost thousands of their number, and the survivors were exposed to imminent danger. It was a fortunate circumstance that the victorious sultan possessed a generous soul. Moved with compassion at the misfortunes of the Christians, and seeing them no longer able to weaken his power, he afforded them the means of returning in safety, on condition that they would surrender Damietta, and evacuate all Egypt. These con- ditions were indeed very different from those ^thich he had proposed a few weeks before; but the respective situations of both armies were now completely changed. The treaty met with a speedy acceptance and execution; and the Christians, leaving the Egyptian shores, returned by sea to Ptolemais, where their arrival produced as much grief and consternation, as the news of their first success had produced hope and joy (a. d. 1221). Some years after, the famous Frederic II, emperor of Germany, arrived in Palestine, at the head of new bands of crusaders. He obtained, by a treaty, from the sultan of Egypt, the restitution of Jerusalem ; but this he purchased by terms otherwise so unfavorable, and moreover took so little precaution to defend the Holy City, that it was soon retaken by the infidels. The conduct of Frederic became a subject of reproach through all Christendom. He disregarded the complaints, returned to Europe, and there again indulged his vices and unruly passions to such a degree, as to provoke more and more the indignation of his contemporaries, the censures of the Church, and the anger of heaven; so that the end of his career was as gloomy and miserable, as its beginning had been brilliant and prosperous. Palestine was next visited by Theobaldus, king of Navarre, and by some other princes, who did nothing very remarkable. Finally, Richard, earl of Cornwall, and brother of the king of England, arrived with an army of English crusaders. This prince had sufficient cour- age and resolution to carry on the holy war with more vigor than had been displayed for many years; but he found the Christians of 284 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 5. Syria divided into so many parties, that all lie could do i'or them wai to conclude a new treaty of peace with the Saracens (a. d. 1241) After his departure, a sudden invasion of fresh barbarians from Kora- zan laid waste the Holy Land 3 the Christian colonies met with repeated losses j and there now remained no hope of restoring then forlorn affairs, unless some powerful monarch would take the arduous task upon himself. SEVENTH CRUSiVDE.— ST LOUIS.— a. d. 1244—1254. Henry III and Louis IX were reigning at this time, the former in England, the latter in France. The beginning of Henry's reign had been quiet. This prince, being gentle, humane and religious, at first easily won the hearts of his subjects by the solemn sanction which he gave to the privileges contained in the Magna Charta, and by the suc- cess of his arms against Llewellyn, prince of Wales. Afterwards, his w^ant of energy, his prodigalities, the many extortions committed by some of his ministers; above all, the repeal of certain national privi- leges, and the preference given at court to foreigners, gradually ren- dered his government odious to the lords and to the people. A pow- erful confederacy was formed against the king by the barons, who only wailed for a proper occasion to commence hostilities ; and, in the interim, the general discontent frequendy manifested itself by the refusal of subsidies or '^ grants of money ' to the government In such circumstances, it was plain that litde or no assistance could be expected from England for the recovery of Jerusalem. France, on the contrary, was at that time in a flourishing condition under Louis IX. This prince, who, according to the infidel Voltaire himself, carried the practice of virtue to an uncommon degree of he- roism, had succeeded his father Louis VIII, in the year 1226, when only twelve years old. The regency was intrusted to his mother, Blanche of Castile, a virtuous and courageous princess, who, on one side, watched with the utmost care over his royal, and especially his Christian education;* and, on the other, knew how to repress by force of arms the attempts made by restless vassals to obtain an ascendency over her, and to increase their power at the expense of thjD crown. When Louis took the reins of government into his OAvn * "My son," she would often say to hi-m, from his infancy, " God knrws how dear you are to me ; still, I snould infinitely prefer to see yon fall dead at my feet, than ever see you guilty of a mortal sin." These words, sc worthy of a Christian mother, had such an eflect on the young prince that he is thought never to have lost his baptismal innocence. A. D. 1244 — 1254.] SEVENTH CRUSADE. 285 hands, new wars disturbed his kingdom ; and it again oecime neces- sary to check the insolence of the earl of La Marche. a vassal who was the more dangerous, in consequence of the mighty aid he received from the king of England, his relative. Notwithstanding the great difficulty which Henry found in obtaining subsidies and raising troops, he at length succeeded in both these objects ; and, crossing the sea, landed in Guyenne, where he saw himself at the Head of a considerable force. Louis, without losing a moment of time, marched against him, completely defeated him near Taille Dourg; and, on the following day, gained a new victory under the walls of Saintes. So much vigor terrified the rebellious count, who surrendered at discretion, and was pardoned. The English king, who fled to Bordeaux, hastened likewise to conclude a treaty of peace, after which he returned to England, without having won a single laurel, to the great disappointment of his subjects (a. d. 1242). Louis, having thus conquered both his domestic and foreign enemies, and freed himself from the danger of subsequent attacks, turned his thoughts to the affairs of the East. The deplorable con- dition of Palestine, and particularly of Jerusalem, under the Mussul- man yoke, deeply afflicted his generous heart. On his unexpected recovery from a dangerous disease, in the year 1244, he took the cross, and by his exhortations induced the principal dukes, counts and barons of his kingdom, to imitate his example. When all neces- sary preparations were made, Louis intrusted the care of the govern- ment to his virtuous mother, and embarked, with nearly fifty thou- sand men, at Aigues Mortes, a sea port in the south of France (a. d. 1248). The fleet reached the friendly harbors of the island of Cyprus to v/ards the end of September, and spent there the whole winter. In ♦Ul' spring it sailed again for Egypt, which the king with his council hiid determined to attack first, as being the pnncipal seat of the Ma- hometan power. The sultan, on his side, had taken all possible mea- sures to prevent the fleet from landing; and when the crusaders ar- rived near Damietta, they saw the beach covered with a countless multitude of Saracen troops, who seemed to oppose a dense forest of s won Is and pikes to the assailants. This, however, was but a trifling obs^tacle to the impetuosity of the French ; Louis himself did not wait till the vessel in wnich he was should reach the shore; but, sword in hand, he threw himself into the sea, Ibllowerl by his vahant knights. The Saracens, struck with terror, were dispersed, leaving (o the conquerors, the undisturbed possession, not only of the coast, but evpn of Dan'ieita: measures were adopted to secure the important conqueet; and, after a short sojourn in the city and its environs, the crusaders marched towards Cairo, the capital of Egypt. 286 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 5. The Mussulmans assembled their forces on the opposite side of a deep canal formed by the Nile, and prevented for one month the pas- sage of the Christian army. At length, an Arabian peasant agreed^ for a large sum of money, to point out a ford; the river was crossed, and the enemy driven from their camp, would have again suffered an entire defeat, had the count of Artois, a brother of the king- known how to temper his valor with prudence. At the sight of the Saracens flying in all directions, this impetuous prince forgot the or- der which he had received, not to pursue the fugitives until the whole force of the crusade should arrive. Rushing forward with a body of fifteen hundred knights, he drove before him the Mussulman forces. In vain did the earl of Salisbury, with the grand masters of the Hospitallers and the Templars, endeavor to cool his imprudent ardor; blinded by success, he still rushed on, and entered the city of Massoura with the fugitive, who at first imagined that they were pur- sued by the whole Christian army. They quickly recovered from their panic, and perceiving the small number of their pursuers, shut the gates of the town and united their efforts with those of the in- habitants, to crush at once these brave but incautious men. A ter- rible fight took place in the streets of Massoura; during five hours the most prodigious display of courage was made by the two par- ties; but the Christians, besides being greatly inferior in force, began to be exhausted with weariness. At last, valor was overcome by numbers; almost all were killed, and the earl of Artois fell, together with his soldiers, on a heap of Saracens whom he had slain with his own hand. Whilst the Moslems were fighting within the city, another furious engagement took place around its walls, and along the banks of the canal. Although the crusaders, and especially the king, fought wkh determined bravery, and twice repulsed the enemy, yet the conse- quences of this battle were fearfully fatal. The crusaders were now considerably reduced, and nearly all their horses had perished. More- over, the dead bodies thrown into the Nile infected its waters, and gave rise to a pestilence which, in a very short time, changed the Christian camp into a vast hospital. In fine, the Saracen army hav- ing succeeded in preventing all communication between the ciusaders and the city of Damietta whence they drew their provisions, famine added its ravages to those of the plague, and rendered the retreat from Massoura, a necessary, though a difficult and perilous attempt. The king, by his superior courage and prudence, might perhaps have con- ducted tnis retrograde march with some success; but, as he made i\ his duty to visit the sick, as well as to repel the attacks of the enemy, he contracted the disease, and was reduced in a few days to a state of complete exhaustion. Being almost at the point of death, he A. i». 1254—1568.] ST. LOUIS, etc. 287 suspended his march at a httle town near the banks of the Niic, and there, notwithstanding the heroic bravery of his knights, was taken prisoner with his surviving brothers and the sad remnant of his troops (a. d. 1250). Louis displayed in his prison the firmness, intrepidity and mag- nanimity which he had always evinced on the throne and at the head of armies. The very barbarians into whose hands he had fallen, were compelled to admire his noble conduct and undaunted courage; and their emirs more than once acknowledged that he was the bravest Christian they had ever seen. At length, a treaty was concluded, in virtue of which Louis, by restoring Damietta, recovered his liberty, and by giving considerable sums of money, provided for the ransom of the other captives. He then sailed for Palestine, where, after his arrival at Ptolemais, he spent four years in promoting the cause of religion, securing, as well as he was able, the welfare of the Christian colonies, and repairing the fortifications of the towns which were yet in their power. The intelligence which a message from Paris gave him of the death of his mother Blanche, induced him to return He was received in France with universal joy; and he himself, not- withstanding the many sorrows that afflicted his soul, experienced the pleasure of a tender father just restored to his children, and had, moreover, the satisfaction to find his kingdom in the same peaceful and prosperous condition in which he had left it six years before. ST. LOUIS CONTINUED.— CIVIL WAR IN ENGLAND A. D. 1254—1268. Louis, after his return from Palestine, applied more than ever to promote the happiness of his people by measures of justice, statutes well adapted to the preservation of public order, insthutions ot charity, and the assiduous care which he took to nave his laws faith- fully executed. So remarkable and so well known was his equity, that not only his subjects, but even foreigners, referred to him with perfect confidence the decision of their quarrels. This particularly appeared on the following occasion. At that time, the English barons were highly incensed against their king, Henry III, who had disregarded their former complaints res- pecting some defects of his government. In a great assembly held at Oxford (a. d. 1258), they not only demanded the execution of the Magna-Charta, but also endeavored to impose on the monarch ne^ conditions tending evidently to weaken his power ; conditions which 288 MODERN HISTORY. [pART 5 he of course rejected. The whole subject of dispute was referred to the arbitration of Louis. After mature discussion, the Frencn king pronounced his decision: he confirmed the national privileges con- tained in the Magna-Charta, but annulled the late decrees of Oxford, as opposed to the just authority of the crown (a. d. 1264). This decision, however equitable, displeased ttie party of the ba- ron . Far from abiding by it according to their previous promise^ they openly raised the standard of insurrection ; and, under the com- mand of the earl of Leicester, marched with a numerous army against the royalists, who were commanded by the king in person and his eldest son Edward. A battle was fought near the town of Lewes, *,he issue of which proved as fatal, as the beginning had been favor- able to the royal cause. Prince Edward easily routed the enemy's wing opposed to him ; but, as frequently happens on such occasions, instead of improving his advantage by falling on the rear of the con- federates, he incautiously pursued the fugitives, and thus left the cen- tre of his own army undefended. The earl of Leicester seized the opportunity, and, making a sudden and vigorous attack, gained so complete a victory, that the king himself fell into his power. The victorious count conveyed his prisoner from town to town ; and, leaving him the name, assumed to himself all the authority of a sovereign. His daring ambition soon provoked discontent and hatred j the yoke which Leicester laid upon the nation appeared too heavy ; and, at the end of one year, the restoration of Henry was almost universally desired. Under these circumstances. Prince Edward easily succeeded in assembling new troops, marched against the usurper, and, more successful than before, defeated and slew him in the sanguinary battle of Evesham (a. d. 1265). Not content with this result, he continued to harass the confederates, until he gave the deadly blow to their league by the reduction of the island of Ely, whither its last partisans had retired. Thus was the sceptre again placed, more securely than ever, in the hands of Henry; and Eng- land, after so many disturbances, began to enjoy profound peace, which permitted Edward to share in the second crusade of iSt. Louis — the eighth and last of the crusades. EIGHTH AND LAST CRUSADE— a. d. 1268—1272. The French monarch had not been so dispirited by the lil success of his first expedition, as to renounce his project of waging war against the Saracens for the defence of the Christian colonies in the East ; he was, on the contrary, urged to the execution of his design A. D. 12G8 — 1272.] EIGHTH AND LAST CRUSADE. 269 by ihe last melancholy news from Syria. The Moslems there were obstinately bent on depriving the Franks of their last possessions, and exercised frightful cruelties against those whom they made pri- soners, and who refused to embrace Mahometanism. But lately, Antioch had fallen into the hands of Bendocdar, the sultan of Egypt, and one hundred thousand inhabitants had been led away captive. Louis once more expressed his determination to go beyond the sea for the purpose of delivering Palestine from its oppressors; and many princes, lords, knights, and other warriors, again flocked to his stan- dard. Having provided for the security of his kingdom during his absence, he embarked Avith sixty thousand chosen troops in the beginning of July (a. d. 1270), and landed at Tunis in Africa, near the ruins of Carthage. The chief reason which prompted St. Louis to give this direction lo the crusade, was that the king of Tunis had given hopes of his becoming a convert to the true faith, if, in taking so important a step, he could be protected from the displeasure of his subjects. This conversion, were it to take place, seemed likely to facilitate the reco- very of the Holy Land, by depriving the Egyptian sultan of hi.s most powerful ally. But these hopes quickly ranished. When the Christian host arrived at Tunis, the Mussulman prince, far from asking for instruction and baptism, prepared to make resistance, and m every thing openly acted as an enemy. Louis, perceiving that the town had strong fortifications, and was defended by a numerous garrison, did not think proper to commence the attack before the arrival of reinforcements daily expected from Sicily. In the interim, he contented himself with protecting his camp by intrenchraents and ditches, and repelling the frequent skirmishes of the Moors. The measures taken by the king against a foreign foe were per- fectly successful: but all his precaution did not suffice to avert the attacks of another sort of enemies. Malignant fevers and dysen- teries, caused by bad water and the heat of the climate, began to rage throughout the camp with such violence, that nearly half of the army was carried off in a few days. The king himself was attacked by the disease, and saw the end of his life rapidly approaching. Never did he appear greater than at this critical juncture. Although he suffered acute pains, he continued to give his orders, and to console every one around him, with his*usual tranq-uiliity and presence of rnind.* At last, his constitution yielded to the violence of the malady; having given his last instruction and blessing lo his son Philip and received the last sacraments of the Church with the most edifying piety, raising his eyes towards heaven, he calmly expired, whilst pronouncing these words of the Royal Prophet; I loill come into thy 25 290 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 5. house; I will worship towards thy holy temple (Psalm, v, 8). He held lived fifty-six years, and reigned forty-four. In St. Louis, there was a rare combination of personal accomplish- ments, and even of apparently opposite qualities, which made him not only superior to his age, but confessedly one of the most extraor- dinary men that ever wore a crown. . His love of religious exercises was never an obstacle to the fulfilment of his public duties. His un- common piety, his simplicity of manners, and meekness in private life, never prevented him from being a faithful dispenser of justice, a wise legislator, an intrepid warrior, and a dignified monarch. Not only France, but all Europe, and also popes, kings and emperors, entertained for him the highest respect. He won the admiration even of that Asiatic prince, called Le vieux cle la montagne, from whom the other crowned heads had so much to fear for their lives; and of those terrible Mamelukes of Egypt whose prisoner he was, and who once, as is commonly believed, deliberated whether they should appoint him their sovereign. In a word, Louis IX, by prac- tising every royal, mihtary, and Christian virtue in an eminent degree, was at the same time a great king, a great hero, and a great saint. Innumerable witnesses bore testimony to his unblemished morals and piety; and no later than the year 1297, the 27th after his death, he was solemnly canonized by Pope Boniface VIII.* His decease caused inexpressible grief among the soldiers. Grief however did not abate their courage; and the Moslems, especially after the arrival of the Sicilians, were so frequently and so signally defeated, that they were compelled to sue for peace, which was granted on conditions both honorable and advantageous to the Chris- tians, most of whom then re-embarked for Europe. A few only having at their head the English prince Edward, sailed for Palestine for the purpose of carrying on the sacred expedition. This they did during part of the year 1271 ; but their small number prevented them from undertaking any thing of consequence ; and Edward, after having been exposed to the danger of losing his life both by sickness and by the dagger of an assassin, availed himself of the conclusion * " Ce fut un beau spectacle que celul de I'instruetion canonique dans laquelle le pere commun des fidfeles interrogea les contemporains de Loais IX sur les vertus de sa vie et les bienfaits de son regne. Des Frangais de toutes les classes vinrent attester surl'Evangile que le monarq le aont ils pleuraient la mort, dtait digne de toutes les recompenses du ciej. ♦Parmi eux on remarquait les vieux compagnons d'armes de Louis, qui avaienl ?artag6 ses fers en Egypte, qui I'avaient vu mourant sur la cendre devant 'unis. L'Europe entiere confirma leur religieiix temoignage, et rdp^ta ces paroles du chef de I'^glise : Maison de France, rejouis-ioi d'avoir donne au monde un si grand prince ; rejouis-toi, peuple de France, d'avoir eu vn si bon roil" — Michaut, Histoire des Croisades, vol. v,pp. 114 — 115. A. D. 1268 — 1272.] EIGHTH AND LAST CRUSADE. 291 of o truce with the Saracens, to return to England, where he suc- ceeded his father Henry III, who had died during his absence. Thus terminated tlie eighth and last crusade, in 1272. Two yearo after. Pope Gregory X, who had witnessed with his own eyes the sorrows of Palestine, endeavored to promote a new expedition in its favor; but his premature death, together with a variety of other obstacles, prevented the execution of that design. Hence every thing now tended to the utter expulsion of the Franks from Syria, and the more so, as they incessantly provoked the justice of God by quarrels among themselves and by the depravity of their hves. Many of the piaces which they had hitherto preserved, were successively and rapidly conquered by the sultan Bendocdar and his successors. Ptolemais, then the capital of the Christian colonies, saw the storm approaching its walls, and could not avert it; in the beginning of April (1291), it was invested on the land side by sixty thousand horse and one hundred and sixty thousand infantry, who were commanded by the sultan Chaiil in person and supplied with three hundred enor- mous machines, destined to batter and overthrow the ramparts. The city, although populous, did not contain more than twenty thousand cflective men, who were soon reduced to twelve thousand. Still, they at first offered, at every point, a vigorous and successful resis- tance, and during six weeks repelled all the attacks of their number- less foes, producing such slaughter among them, that in one of those furious assaults, seven Moslems were said to have fallen for one Christian. But the losses of the Saracens could be easily repaired, whilst those of the besieged were irreparable, their numbers diminish- ing every day, until there were but one thousand warriors left. In this ftightful distress, even the heroic intrepidity of the Knights Hos- pitallers and Templars could uphold only a few hours longer the tottering fortune of Acre; they resisted almost to the last; and it was only when the city had lost its defenders, that it was carried by storm on the eighteenth of May of the same year 1291, Tlie merciless conquerors destroyed every thing with fire and sword iN that unfortunate city, slaughtering even a multitude of harmless prisoners who had implored their compassion. The town was utterly devastated. Of the inhabitants who had time t) make cheir escape by sea, some fled to the island of Cyprus, others landed on the shores of Italy, where they wandered from place to place, beggi«g their bread, and relating, with tears, the sad story of the ia.te of the Christians in the East. 292 MODERN HISTORY. " [PART 5. KEMARKS ON THE CRUSADES. The ill success of the last crusades entirely extinguished that spiril of zeal for the deliverance of Jerusalem, which had animated the first crusaders. Succeeding attempts to renew those expeditions, proved fruitless j and the wars carried on in subsequent centuries between the Christians and the Turks, were like those which powerful, neighboring and rival nations wage against each other. Like other transactions of the middle ages, the crusades have been for very many modern writers, an object of scorn, and a favorite topic for abusive and insulting language. In the opinion of these men, the crusades, were prompted by unjust and absurd motives^ were car- ried on without judgment; and were disastrous in their consequences. It is our duty here to examine these charges, and see whether they rest on a solid foundation. With regard to the motives which prompted the nations of Europe to undertake the crusades, they were certainly as just and reasonable as any that ever occasioned wars among men. It was for the pur- pose of putting a stop to the barbarous oppression to which both the Latin pilgrims and the eastern Christians were exposed, that our European ancestors every where took up arms, and ruslied to the field, urged by motives of honor, humanity and religion. Theii ardor and readiness to enlist in this generous enterprise, was more- over powerfully excited by the suppliant entreaties of the Greek emperor Alexius, who called for assistance against the same barba- rians then in possession of Jerusalem. The desire of rescuing the holy sepulchre from the oppressive yoke of those infidels, may have been the most usual feeling that actuated many of the crusaders, but it was not the only object of the crusades; and this desire, very just in itself, as it merely tended to attack recent and cruel usurpers, con- cealed a still more important design, namely, that of saving the coun- tries of Europe itself from the invasion with which they were threatened. Indeed, what was not to be feared from those Mussulman horde p, who nad already made such progress, and seemed to conquer foi no other end than to destroy Christianhy and civilization! How alarm- ing was their restless and warlike spirit, always inflamed and fostered by fanaticism and the desire of pillage! Were our forefathers then patiently to wait for the yoke of servitude to be laid upon themi Did it become the Christian nations to suffer themselves to be succes- sively subdued and oppressed, rather than to oppose a powerful bar- rier to the progress of their common enemy 7 We admire and praise REMARKS ON THE CRUSADES. 293 Annibal for having crossed seas and rivers and mountains, that he might carry war into the centre of Italy, and conquer the Romans upon the very territory of Rome — and shall we blame the European princes for having done the like in much more difficult and trying circumstances, by going to attack the Turks and Saracens in the pro- vinces of Asia, in the very bulwark of their power? In fine, was it not better for the Latin lords to turn against these implacable enemies the weapons which, especially during those turbulent ages of the feudal system, they had so often used to attack the property and lives of one another? Now, who can doubt that these considerations were perfectly known to the leaders of the Christian states ; since, from the very beginning of the first crusade, Pope Urban II, in the council of Cler- mont, expressly mentioned them, and inculcated them in a strain of animated eloquence : "Warriors who hsten to me," said he, "rejoice; the time has come for you to show your courage in the best of causes; the time has come for you to expiate, by your generous exertions in a lawful war, the many acts of violence and injustice which you have committed even during the time of peace. After being so long the terror of your own countrymen and fellow-Chris- tians, go now, and, taking the sword of the Maccabees, protect the people of God and defend your persecuted brethren against the implacable enemies of the Christian name ...... Mussulman impiety has overspread the fairest regions of Asia; Ephesus, Nice, Antioch, have become Mahometan cities; the barbarous hordes of the Turks have planted their colors on the very shores of the Hellespont, whence they threaten war to all the states of Christendom. Unless you oppose a mighty barrier to their triumphant course, how can Europe be saved from invasion? how can the storm be averted, which has so long threatened to burst upon our countries?"* Such were the motives, such the objects of the crusades ; can any be conceived more pure, more noble than these? and, consequently, were not the crusades as just as any other wars of that or any period? They cost, it is true, the lives of nearly two millions of crusaders; but the loss, although lamentable in itself, was far from being as extraor- dinary and dread.ul as might at first sight appear, l*^. It was not greater than that occasioned by wars much less important and justi- fiable, and of much shorter duration. The conquests of Genghis-Kan alone destroyed five or six, some say, eighteen millions of individuals. Thewar for the succession of Spain, which did not last more than twelve years (1701 — 1713), carried off two millions of persons. — Napoleon * From contemporaiy authors, apud Michaut. vol. i, jtp 104 and 106 See also Collect. Condi, vol. x, col. 511 — 516. 25* 294 MODEKN HISTORY. [PART 5. Bonaparte, in the course of twenty years (1795 1815), is supposed to have occasioned the death of no fewer than seven or tight mil lions of men, mostly to gratify his ambition and desire of miUtary fame; yet, this man is admired and extolled as the greatest hero of modern times, and the promoters and leaders of the crusades, whose views were so upright, so grand, and so generous, are bitterly and mercilessly censured! 2°. The number of those who perished in consequence of the holy wars, ought rather to appear comparatively small, if we consider that it must be divided between almost all the nations of Europe, and that, too, during the long interval of nearly two hundred years. 3°. The loss of so many individuals was com- pensated by the invaluable benefits which resulted from the crusades, and which will be mentioned in the course of these remarks. Let a single observation suffice here: two millions of Christians may have perished in those distant expeditions; but, in thus perishing, ihey saved European civilization, secured the independence of Chris- tian states, and laid the foundation of the happiness of future gene- rations; do they deserve censure for all this? and does it become those who now enjoy the benefits resulting from their generous devotedness, to complain of their conduct? Agam ; if our European ancestors were not allowed to feel a deep concern in the most sacred-monuments of their faith, and to defend the cause of God against savage barbarians ; if they had no right to assist and relieve a cruelly oppressed people, and to deliver them and their country from cruel usurpers; if they committed an injustice in repelling from defenceless frontiers a restless and rapacious foe, whose object was pillage, bloodshed and destruction — then, indeed, we might with truth assert that they were awfully mistaken in thus laying down their lives for religion, their country, and their fellow- men ; and that we alone, with our degenerate sentiments, our con- tracted views of pecuniary speculations and self-interest, are wise, enlightened and praiseworthy ! But who would make the odious as- sertion? — who, on the contrary, is so insensible to all that is noble, grand and generous in human actions, as to withhold from the reli- gious and social heroism which prompted our forefathers to undertake the crusades, the merited homage of sincere admiration. Let us now view the manner in which these expeditions were con ducted. It is true that, notwithstanding the wise regulations re- peatedly enacted by popes and princes, many disorders and excesses were committed by the crusaders ; but this is no reason to impeach the lawfulness and justice of the crusades themselves, since similar dis- orders and excesses have occurred in other wars, even the most just and necessary. This unfortunate circumstance then is not the fault of the military enterprise itself, but of the individuals who have a REMARKS ON THE CRUSADES. 295 share in itj and merely proves, mat man is always accompanied oy his passions, and that there is no object, how good and excellent so- ever, which may not be abused, and become, through his instrumen- tality, an occasion of evil. Moreover, if many of those who called themselves the soldiers of the cross, committed depredations, cruelties and other excesses, how many also, especially among the leaders, acted with a moderation and dignity worthy of the cause which they defended! How often, whilst contending with the treachery of the Greeks or the ferocity of the Turks, did they content themselves with displaying a magnani- mous courage, and a chivalric adherence to their promises ! How many specimens did they exhibit of energetic resolution, generous feelings, invincible patience and noble fortitude! Let the facts speak for themselves : the history of the crusades presents so many acts of virtue and glorious feats of arms, that it will, notwithstanding the pre- judices of the day, for ever remain the most interesting portion ot the history of the middle ages. As to the result of these grand and noble expeditions, there were numerous obstacles to their full success with regard to the conques. and lasting possession of Palestine, viz. the distance of countries, the difference of climates; the excessive heat and other inconveni- ences of the weather; the scarcity or bad qualities of the provisions, which occasioned malignant fevers, dysenteries and pestilential dis- eases; the mixture and jealousy of different nations; the opposite views and interest of their leaders; etc. etc. Still, although the cru- sades did not fully attain their immediate object, the entire recovery and the preservation of the Holy Land, great and invaluable were the advantages which they otherwise produced. The first was, as we have already observed, the remarkable dimi- nution of the power of both the Saracens and the Seljukian Turks, who were thus prevented from penetrating into the heart of Chris- tendom. Another happy effect which the crusades very naturally had, was to procure the absence of a multitude of petty princes and chieftains, who were almost constantly quarrelling among themselves or with their sovereigns, and whose restlessness had, until then, brought so many evils upon the fairest portions of Europe. The oppressions, and other evil consequences of the feudal system gradually disap- peared; travelling became easier and more secure; towns and bo- roughs obtained their enfranchisement; etc. In the third place, the necessity of transporting the crusading ar- mies to Egypt and Palestine, naturally improved the art of naviga tion. The mariner's compass, invented some time before, began to be used during the seventh crusade, and prepared the discovery of 296 MODEKN HISTOEY. [PART 5. the cape of Good Hope, and the still more important discovery of America. Fourthly — Commerce, the profits of which were undoubtedly a powerful motive for some of the crusaders, was also vastly enlarged Dy the constant intercourse of the European nations with their colo- nies in Asia. Venice, Genoa, Pisa, and other maritime towns, ra- pidly increased in wealth, power and glory. New and valuable arti- cles were imported from the East into the West, and, succeeding well upon this new soil, formed several important branches of trade, such as the sugar-cane and its produce, with which the crusaders be- came acquainted in 1099; silk, which commenced to be manufactured in Italy towards 1209 j many useful medicaments j etc. In fine, the daily communications of our ancestors with Greece and Syria, were one of the most powerful helps towards the com- plete revival of literature, arts and sciences. Hence we see that the principal universities of Europe were founded in the twelfth or in the thirteenth century, during or immediately after the crusades: v. g. those of Padua and Paris about the year 1180; — that of Naples, in 1230 3 — Vienna, in 1238; — Salamanca, in 1240; — Cambridge, in 1280; — Lisbon, in 1290; etc. Decrees were issued by popes and coun- cils to establish in Rome, Oxford, Paris, Bologna and Salamanca, classes and masters of Hebrew, Arabic and Chaldaic; the masters being moreover bound to translate into Latin the best works origi- nally written in these languages. From that time also, geography began to be much better known; chemistry, or rather alchymy opened its laborvatories; and, besides a multitude of eminent scholars and divines, the age of the crusades produced many excellent histo- rians, William of Tyre, Roger Hoveden, Villehardouin, Joinville, and others.* * The truth of these remarks ha? not escaped the learned authors of the English Universal History. " The result of the crusades," they say, " al though fatal to some particular nations, was extremal}^ advantageous to Christendom at large ; they stopped the progress of tlie Mahometan power, at the time of its greatest efforts ; they taught the princes of Europe the value of a navy ; and, by making them better acquainted with the situa- tion, productions and political state of the vast countries of Asia, they opened the way for those discoveries and conquests which have been, in after times, an inexhaustible source of gain. These advantages, it is true, were not reaped but at a long interval after the crusades, and this is the reason why so few authors have viewed them under a proper aspect; but the fact itself is not less evidently demonstrated. Even, at the remote pe- riod when those expeditions took place, a Venetian (Sanudo, in a work en- titled: Secreta fidelium Cruets) wrote a learned and judicious treatise on this subject, which, though it had then little eifect, furnishes us at least with an incontestible proof, that these happy consequences of the crusades had been foreseen long before they happened and could be generally under otood." Univ. Hist. vol. lv, p. 279. See also Histoire du Bas Emptre, REMARKS ON THE CRUSADES. 297 Such were the innneihse and lasting advantages produced by those expeditions against which so much spleen has been vented within tlie three last centuries; advantages far greater than the par- tial and transitm-y evils to wliich the same enterprises accidentally gave occasion, and well calculated to remove from the minds of the most prejudiced any impression unfavorable to the crusades. (A. M. SS. C. G., Paris, 1838), vol. i,pp. 434 — 140 ;— Bdrault-Bercaste!, jyiscmirs sur le troisieme dge de I'Eglise ; — Bergier, Diction. Theolog.f ail Croisades ; — Nonnote, Erreurs de Voltaire, vol. i, ch. xviii. PART VI. FROM THE END OF THE CRUSADES (A. D. 1272), TO THE DISCO^BRV OF AMERICA (A. D. 1492). ENGLAND, WALES, AND SCOTLAND, UNDER KINGS ED- WARD I AND II.— A. D. 1273—1314. Prince Edward, after his return from Palestine, ascended with- out opposition the throne of his ancestors, and occupied it, during thirty-four years, with great, though not unblemished glory. His government was vigorous, but frequently despotic; his exploits were remarkable^ but often accompanied with an excessive rigor bordering on cruelty ; on the whole, Edward I deserved the reputation of an able rather than of a good monarch. Naturally ambitious, he resolved to restore to the English crown, by his conquests, its former dignity which had been considerably diminished by the misfortunes and weakness of the two last kings, and he aspired to concentrate in nimself the sovereignty of the whole island of Great Britain; nor was ne entirely disappointed in his endeavors. Great Britain, not including Ireland, contained three separate states, viz. the two kingdoms of England and Scotland, and the principality of Wales. This last was at that time under the sway of Llewellyn, a prince who had inherited from his family a deep hatred against the English, and in preceding wars had conquered them in many battles. Contrary to the practice of several of his predecessocs, he sternly refused, at the accession of Edward, to do him homage for his do- minions. Edward, thus provoked, seized the opportunity offered him to attack the Welsh; and, declaring open war, invaded their country with superior forces. It was in vain that Llewellyn took refuge among the inaccessible mountains which had, for many ages, defended his ancestors against all the attempts of Roman and Saxon conquerors ; Edward, not less active than vigilant, penetrated into the very heart of the country, and prepared to force the Welsh in their last retreats. Llewellyn, seeing himself destitute of all resources^ A. D. 1273 — 1315.] GERMANY, ETC. 299 consented to make his submission, which however did not last long; be withdrew it once more, but was slain in a decisive engagement near the river Wye, and witn him expired the independence of Wales (A. D, 1283). This principality was thenceforth united to the Eng- lish crown, and given, as a portion, to the eldest sons of the English monarchs. Shortly after the subjugation of Wales, the affairs of Scotland en- gaged Edward's attention, and gave him hopes of adding that king- dom also to his dominions. There were several competitors for the crown; the English monarch, to whom the controversy was referred (a. d. 1290), acted first as mediator; but, as new difficuhies daily arose among the Scottish lords, he soon began to act the part of a conqueror. Yet, notwithstanding his great exertions and many vic- tories, the conquest never was complete nor secure. During the remainder of his life, the Scots frequently shook off the yoke, and, after his death, which happened in 1307, entirely recovered their national freedom, under the weak reign of his son Edward II. In this protracted war, the most famous champions of Scottish liberty, were William Wallace, who for some time proved a match for all the efforts of the English ; and Robert Bruce, who fought the cele- brated battle of Bannock-Burn against King Edward II, and, by a signal victory, secured the independence of Scotland (a. d. 1314). GERMANY UNDER THE EMPEROR RODOLPH OF HAPS- BURG.-COxMMENCEMENT OF THE HELVETIAN CON- FEDERATION.— a. D. 1273—1315. Ever since the death of Frederic II in 1250, Germany had been m a state of confusion and disorder. The people were oppressed; robberies, and other excesses were daily committed with impunity; public and private wars continued without interruption. In this de- plorable crisis, a man of uncommon prudence, courage and firmness, was indispensably required to check so many evils ; such a man was found in Rodolph, count of Hapsburg, from whom sprung the illus- trious family of Austria. Being chosen emperor in 1273, by the unanimous votes of the German princes, he immediately directed all his efforts to the restoration of order and tranquillity. Success at- tended his exertions; and Germany, recovering from her calamities, enjoyed under him a peace to which she had long been a stranger. Still, it was not in the power of Rodolph to bring back the empire to its former extent and splendor. During the interregnum that pre- ceded his reign, the state had been stripped of important provinces. 300 MODEEN HISTORY. [PART 6. two of which, Sicily and Naples, being first subdued and possessed by the French under Charles of Anjou, the brother of St. Louis, suc- cessively passed into the hands of the Arragonian kings, the formei in 1282, by the slaughter of the French, an event well known under the name of llie Sicilian Vespers, and the latter by conquest, at a subsequent period. Another revolution took place under Albert, the son of Rodolph, in 1308, when Switzerland began to form itself into an independent republic. Until then, Switzerland, formerly called Helvetia, had been a por- tion of the German empire. Its inhabitants, great lovers of their country and of liberty, considered themselves rather under the pro- tection than under the authority of the emperor, and valued their privileges more than life itself. The emperor Albert had the impru- dence to provoke their indignation, by summoning them to become vassals to him as duke of Austria; and he moreover excited their resentment, by appointing as governors over the Helvetian districts three men commonly represented as capable of the most tyrannical excesses. To the summons, the spirited natives returned a peremp- tory refusal, and to the oppression which, it is said, soon began to weigh heavy upon them, they prepared to oppose an undaunted resistance, under the direction of the famous William Tell and some others of their countrymen, remarkable for their eminently indepen- dent and intrepid character. Many historians add that William Tell had been goaded on to vengeance, by the tyrannical command of one of the three governors to shoot an apple from the head of his own son at a distance of a hundred feet; which he did whhout hurting a hair of the youth. But, whatever may be said of this circumstance, which is by others called in question, and which really wears a ro- mantic appearance, the conspiracy of the Helvetians against a foreign domination was vigorously conducted. They took and destroyed the castles that had been the seat of tyranny, and either put their oppressors to death, or obliged them with their satellites to evacuate the country. All hope of reconciliation between the emperor and the Helvetians was now destroyed. At the first intelligence of the insurrection, Albert prepared to check it by marching in person against those whom he viewed as reoels ; bat lie was murdered at that very time, on the banks of the river Reuss. The districts of Uri, Underwalden. and Schweitz, availed themselves of the disturbances which followed his death, to strengthen their coalition. It was not long, however, • before they saw themselves attacked by a formidable army of Aus- trians under the command of Duke Leopold, a son of the emperoi Albert. With full confidence of victory, this prince ventured to penetrate into the heart of Switzerland through a narrow defile called A. D. 1273—1315.] GERMANY, ETC. 301 Morgarten, while thirteen hundred men of the district of SchweiU took upon themselves the charge of defending it against that multi- tude of Germans, as formerly three hundred Spartans attempted to stop the Persians in the straits oi Thermopylae, The Helvetians posted themselves on the summits of the surrounding mountains, and, as soon as the Austrians had entered that narrow path, cast upon them enormous fragments of rocks, which destroyed the cavalry and threw the infantry in disorder j then, rushing down with resist- less fury, they cut nearly all the enemy to pieces, whilst they them- selves lost only fourteen men. A little before the battle, fifty men, who had been lately banished for misconduct, came and offered to atone for their former delinquen- cies by shedding their blood in defence of their country. However useful their assistance might be to the small army of the Helvetians^ it was looked upon as disgraceful, and consequently rejected. No refusal could be more mortifying nor more disparaging than this to the exiles ; but patriotism made them superior to every consideration. When the fight commenced in tlie valley of Morgarten, this little band attacked the Austrians with undaunted valor, spread terror and destruction wherever they went, and greatly contributed to the victory of their countrymen. What they had just done, inspired them with greater confidence than before j after the battle, they did not hesitate to make their appearance in the camp of the conquerors, and were received by them with every possible mark of gratitude and exultation. The battle of Morgarten was a fatal blow given to the Austrian power in Helvetia, whose inhabitants could now justly hope that their liberty was secure. From that time they formed themselves into a regular confederacy, founded on a few plain and simple prin- ciples. As the struggle ibr independence had taken place particularly in the territory of Schweitz, and the victory had been gained chiefly by the exertions of the natives, the other districts adopted that name for themselves. At first, they were only three in number; but, in the course of time, the neighboring districts and towns joined the confederacy, and by this union formed the nation of the Swiss; a nation much celebrated for its uprightness and loyalty, till the latter years, when its government has been given up to a reckless 3pirit of tyranny, injustice, and persecution. 25 302 MODERN HISTORY [PART 6. PROSECUTION AND ABOLITION OF THE ICNIGHTS TEMPLARS.— A. D. 1307—1312. The Knights Templars, whose institution we mentioned before, had now been in existence for nearly two hundred years. During that time, their devotedness to the cause of Christendom, their heroic valor and exploits against the Saracens, had acquired for their order an extraordinary reputation and immense riches. But wealth and power generated among them a spirit of arrogance and independence, which exasperated both the civil and ecclesiastical authorities. They became proud, intemperate, insolent, and were daily falUng into ill repute, when some of their discontented members gave notice to tne French king, Philip the Fair, of still more shocking and heinous crimes committed in tlie order. The charges were of such a nature, that they at first served only to excite indignation against their authors. It was however thought advisable to make new inquiries, the result of which induced Phihp to have all the Templars of his kingdom arrested on the same day, the thirteenth of October (a. d. 1307). A committee which he appointed in Paris, tried one hundred and forty knights, all of whom, except three, acknowledged the justice of the accusation under which they lay ; and not only they, but even the grand-master and chief comman- ders of the Templars twice confirmed the same by their own free and express acknowledgment. In fine, seventy-two others, were exam- ined at Poitiers, and all confessed themselves guilty of the principal crimes laid to their charge. As the persons thus accused belonged to an order which was reli- gious as well as military. Pope Clement V took cognizance of the affair, and conducted it with the most assiduous attention and scru- pulous impartiality. Struck at the unanimity that existed in the accusations, testimonies and free avowals of so many persons, several of whom he himself had examined, he wrote to all the Christian princes in Europe, that they also might take proper measures against the evil. Every where, the Templars were put under arrest, and courts of inquiry v^^ere appointed according to the pope's command, to examine the accusations brought against them. The prisoners were strictly interrogated, especially with regard to the charges of profligacy, apostacy and impiety Several of them pleaded guilty, and threw themselves on the clemency of their judges, while many others declared themselves innocent, and could not be convicted of any crime. It appears, in fact, that the order was not equally corrupt in all A. D. 1307 — 1312.] rROSECUTioN, etc. 303 places; which fact accounts for the different treatment its several members received in different countries. Many were acquitted, par- ticularly in Germany and Spain ; others were condemned to perpetual jr temporary confinement; others, in fine, who were convicted of enormous crimes, and still obstinately asserted their innocence or even retracted their previous free avowal of their guilt, were delivered to the secular power, to be punished according to the rigor of the law. Fifty-nine were burned at the stake in Paris, nine at Senlis, and several others in the south of France. As for the grand-master, James of Molay, and the chief comman- ders, who were kept with him in safe custody at Paris, the pope had reserved to himself the decision of their fate. In virtue of the sen- tence passed against them by the papal commissaries, they were to be punished only by confinement, on condition that they would repeat, m the presence of the people, their former acknowledgment of their guilt. Two of them obeyed and were treated with mildness; but James of Molay and another Templar, contrary to pubhc expecta- tion, suddenly exclaimed that their order was innocent and had been calumniated. The papal legates, greatly astonished and perplexed, sent them back into custody, and prepared to deliberate on the strange incident. But the king, highly incensed at the unaccountable con- duct of the knights, would not wait any longer. He directly took the advice of his lay -counsellors, and, on the evening of the same day, caused the two prisoners to be transported to a small island formed by the river Seine, and there to be thrown into the flames. The grand- master displayed, in that awful moment, his characteristic courage, which made a deep impression on the spectators. He is even reported to have, a short time before expiring, summoned Pope Cle- ment to appear within forty days, and King Phihp within the space of one year, before the tribunal of their common and sovereign Judge. But this story seems devoid of proof, being omitted by all the histo- rians of that time, and, contradicted by the best critics of more recent date, particularly by Mariana,* F. Brumoy,t Natalis Alexander,^ etc. As to the order itself, whether it should be abolished or maintained, this was a question to be decided by the pope. For this purpose, and for other important affairs, he convoked a general council to be held at Vienne in France, towards the close of the year 1311. The inquiries about the Templars, and their different trials having now occupied nearly five years, the whole result was laid before the poQ- tiff, who communicated it to the prelates of the assembly. That many individuals had been guilty of enormous crimes, could not be • De Rebus HispanifP, lib. xv, c. xi. I Hist, dc VEgl. Gallicanc, vol. xir, I. xxxvr, ad ann. 1312. X In Hist Eccles. Scec. xiv, Dissert, x. qucest. ii, art. i, n. xix» 804 MODERN PlISTORY. PART 6. doubted'5 but there was not equal evidence to implicate the whole order; it was clear, however, that it had greatly degenerated from its original institution and that far from being now of any utility, it was rather an object of scandal to the Church. When these considerations had been weighed for several months, Clement V came to the con- clusion that the order of the Knights Templars could no longer be tolerated with any sort of propriety. Accordingly, on the third oi April (a. d. 1312), he pubhshed, in presence and with the approba- tion of the council, a bull suppressing the institute, not by way of a judicial sentence, but as a measure of prudence and expediency; and, in order that the riches and properties of the Templars might be still preserved for the purposes to which they had been originally destined, they were transferred to the Knights Hospitallers of St. John, who, more faithful to the primitive rules of their noble voca- tion, were still fighting the battles of Christendom against the infidels, from whose hands they had just rescued the island of Rhodes. From this general grant were excepted the estates lying within the king- doms of Arragon, Castile and Portugal: these were reserved for the defence of those .countries against the Moors, who still- possessed a considerable part of the Spanish peninsula.* PROGRESS OF THE CHRISTIANS OF SPAIN, AND SIGNAL VICTORIES OVER THE MOORS.— a. d. 1312—1344. The Christians of Spain were gaining ground almost continually on their enemies; but the Moorish nation, by receiving assistance and supplies from their African brethren, seemed to be a kind of hydra, whose heads re-appeared as fast as they were cut ofif, and nearly as dangerous as before; their frequent defeats appeared to rouse them to new exertions. Besides these, ordinary efforts, extra- ordinary ones were made from time to time, in order to avenge and repair all their losses at once. This, they endeavored to execute par- ticularly in the year 1340, under the conduct of Alboacen, king of Morocco, a prince much renowned for his exploits and conquests among the African tribes. His forces, gathered from every part of Africa, consisted of four hundred thousand infantry, and seventy • The affair of the Knights Templars being very differently represented by various modern authors, we have been careful to consult and follow guides who, from their learning and impartiality, could not lead us astray, and above all, the original documents themselves, so well calculated to repel unjust attacks, and correct inaccurate ideas on this important subject. See note J A. D.1312 — 1314.] CHRISTIANS OF SPAIN", ETC. 305 thousand cavalry, with three hundred and twenty large vessels or galleys to transport them from one shore to the other. Five months were employed in elTecting the passage. At the approach of that immense multitude of Moslems, who were joined by a hundred thousand more from the kingdom of Granada, not only Spain, but all Christendom trembled. Never had so numer- ous an army been raised by any Mahometan prince, not even by those ancient caliphs whose power extended over so many regions of Asia and Africa; The general consternation was increased by the news that the two admirals of Arragon and Castile had been defeated and slain by the Moors, whilst endeavoring to oppose some obstacle to their schemes of invasion. In this imminent danger, nothing but prodigies of energy, activity and courage could save the* invaded country -, this was effected by the king of Castile, Alfonso XI. Not to leave any possible means untried, he sent deputies to various courts of Europe, in order to obtain vessels, money and troops. He could not, it is true, obtain much, owing chiefly to the obstinate war which had broken out oelween France and England; still, the king of Portugal, Alfonso IV, marched in person to the proposed expedition with his choicest troops, who, with those of Castile, formed an army of about forty thousand foot and eighteen or twenty thousand horse. Still the con- tending forces were left in the proportion of one Spaniard to ten Sara- cens, but such was the magnanimity, the noble confidence — nay, the cheerfulness displayed by the Castilian monarch at the approach of the battle, that the utmost ardor pervaded the whole Christian army, and fully made up for the inferiority of numbers. When the two kings advanced to meet their formidable foe, Alboa- cen was besieging the city of Tarifa, from which the battle has taken its name. He abandoned the siege, and posted his innumerable squadrons near a little river called Salado, where he waited the intended attack. On the twenty-eighth of October, the Christians, after having all participated in the sacred mysteries, crossed the stream, and, in battle array, marched against the Moors. History has recorded {e\Y particulars of the battle; but, how extraordinary must have been the courage displayed by the Portuguese and Casti- ILavis, may be collected from the result, which would really be in- credible, were it not corroborated by the most exact historians of Spain, and had not a similar event already happened in the famous battles of Tours (a, d. 732), and Murandal (1212). Here again, in the battle of Tarifa, whilst the Christians hardly suffered any loss (not more than twenty or twenty-five men), from two hundred thou- sand to two hundred and fifty thousand Moors perished on the field of battle, besides a vast multitude of others who were taken prisoners 26 306 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 6. with the family of Alboacen. This prince escaped by a precipitate flight from that field so fatal to his glory and power, and the nest night recrossed the strait in a small boat; thus strikingly resembling Xerxes, and presenting another instance of the same haughty pride followed by a complete overthrow, which has rendered the Persian monarch so famous in history. The two victorious kings returned, loaded with laurels, to their respective states. So great was the quantity of coins and other arti- cles of booty collected in the Mahometan camp, and distributed among the troops, that gold suddenly lost one-sixth of its value. Shortly after this, the naval forces of the king of Morocco were destroyed by the combined fleets of Castile, Arragon and Portugal, under the command of the Genoese admiral, Boccanegra; Alfonso himself gained a new victory, in which forty thousand Moslems were slain and the important city of Algesiras surrendered to that prince in 1344. So many losses greatly advanced the entire ruin of the Moors in Spain ; and it might probably have been effected at thai time, had not a long series of intricate dissensions arisen between the Christian sovereigns of the peninsula, which prolonged the tottering existence of their enemies for one hundred and fifty years more. WAR BETWEEN FRANCE AND ENGLAND. From this period we may date the commencement of that obstinate struggle between France and England, which lasted nearly one hun- dred and twenty years, and, having twice brought the French mo- narchy to the brink of destruction, twice also, by unexpected' changes, finally turned to her advantage, and deprived the English of almost all their continental possessions. The importance as well as long continuance of this war, even during its first period only, induces us to relate it under separate titles and sections. 4 I. EDWARD III OF ENGLAND AND PHILIP VI OF FRANCE. (A. D. 1328—1350). The French king Phihp IV (the Fair), at his death in 1314, left three sons, Louis, Philip and Charles, all of whom, in the short Qpace of fourteen years, successively ascended the throne, and died without male issue. At the decease of Charles IV, the youngest of the three brothers, two competitors, Edward of England, and Phihp of Valois, claimed the succession; the former as grand-son, by his A. D. 1328 — 1350.] EDWAKD III. AND PHILIP VI. 307 mother Isabella, of Philip IV, and the latter as grand-son, by his father Charles de Valois, of Philip III, the immediate predecessoi of Philip IV. It had indeed been decided, in 1316, at the death of Louia X, who left a daughter, that females were, by the fundamental law of the kingdom, excluded from the French throne; but Edward con- tended that, although the sex of his mother might be a disqualification for herself, it could not affect the succession of her son ; Phihp, on the contrary, maintained that a mother could not transmit to her issue a right which she never possessed. This important case was brought before the peers and barons of France, who were unanimous in rejecting the pretensions of Edward.* Philip obtained the crown, and securing its possession by a signal victory over the Flemish, summoned the king of England to do him homage for the Dutchy of Guyenne. This homage was a painful task for the English kings; and the high-minded Edward in particular, most reluctantly submitted to the humiliating ceremony. He moreover continued to see with a jealous eye the French crown in the hands of another, and was well disposed to maintain his pretensions to it by an appeal to arms. Accordingly, as soon as the accession of the Flemish to his cause rendered his forces adequate to such a design, he openly declared war against Philip, towards the beginning of the year 1338. Fortune was at first favorable to the French in their exertions against Edward ; but the naval battle of Sluys, in 1340, gave to the English a decided superiority. A powerful fleet of one hundred and twenty large vessels, carrying forty thousand men, had been raised by Philip, to intercept the British monarch on his passage from Eng- land to Flanders. Edward determined to force the passage, and dis- posed his ships for the combat with such prudence and skill, as to elicit the admiration of the ablest mariners. The battle was obstinate and bloody, and the king himself received a wound, which, however, rather served to increase his natural intrepidity; he skilfully took * That the claims of Edward III to the French throne were unfounded pretensions, can now hardly be denied, and the same has been acknow- ledged by many English historians, v. g. the authors of Univers. Hist. {vol. cviii, -pp. 403 — 404) ; J. Reeve in his History of the Church, (vol. ri, pp. 144 — 145) ; the authoress of a well written History of Great Britain and Ireland, printed at Cork in 1815, [vol. i, p. 149) ; etc. Dr. Lingard contents hini. Gelf with saying, (vol. iv, p. 30, note) that Edward, in order to prove his claim, was obliged to maintain three principles, which he enumerates; but, by not addinfj a word in his favor, nor saying that the monarch proved any of the assertions favorable to his cause, he naturally leads the readei to conclude that the claim itself was groundless, and generally considered as such; whereas Philip de Valois, having on his side the text of the law, the judgment of the peers, and the practice of preceding times, saw his right plainly and unequivocally acknowledged. 808 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 6. advantage of the wind and tide, and vigorously attacKed the enemy's line, until the timely arrival of the Flemish, his alHes, entirely decided the victory in his favor. Nearly all the French vessels were cap- tured, and about twenty-eight thousand men slain or drowned j the loss of the English was comparatively inconsiderable. The battle of Sluys did not, however, terminate tbe dispute between the tv/o monarchs. The following years beheld a series of new and more or less insignificant expeditions, which produced no other effect than to diminish the resources of both parties, without ending the war. At length, the English king resolved to make an extraordinary effort, and crush his opponent by attacking him in different pomts at once. Whilst an army, led by the earl of Derby, engaged the attention of the French in Guienne, Edward himself, with other troops, landed on the coasts of Normandy, and rapidly advanceo towards Paris, burning or plundering all the towns in his way. The approach of Phihp at the head of an army far superior in numbers to his own, induced him to retrace his steps towards the north ; this he did successfully, though with great difficulty and danger. He then posted his troops upon a hill near the village of Crecy in Ponthieu, and waited in good order for the arrival of the enemy (a. d. 1346). Shortly after, the French appeared, and, hurried on by their usual impetuosity, immediately commenced the battle, without allowing themselves any time to rest and to dispose their ranks properly. On the contrary, the English had been taught to regulate valor by disci- pline; so that, being well drilled, well arrayed, and well commanded, they easily overthrew the two first fines of the assailants. King Philip repeatedly strove, but in vain, to rally his forces; at each new charge, he lost the bravest of his attendants, and was finally compelled to abandon the field of battle, which, on the following day, was found covered with more than thirty thousand slain, among whom were eleven princes and twelve hundred knights. The con- querors lost but one esquire, three knights and a few persons of inferior rank. The young prince of Wales, Edward's eldest son, began m this battle to display that courage and ability which afterwards made him so illustrious and successful a general. It was also at Crecy that artillery was for the first time made use of by the English; they had four, some say six, pieces of cannon, which greatly contributed to their victory, by the surprise and the terror they spread among the French troops. The victorious monarch lost no time in improving his advantage, With the view of securing for the future an easy entrance into France, he laid siege to the town of Calais, which was defended by John of Vienna, an experienced commander, and supplied with A. D. 1328—1350.] EDWAED III. AND PHILIP VI. 309 every thing necessary for a long resistance. The operations of Edward were indeed slow in the beginning, but they at length obtained full success ; and Calais, after sustaining a siege of twelve months, and enduring the extremities of a dreadful famine, was obliged to surrender. It was, or seemed to be the conqueror's inten- tion to punish the obstinacy of the townsmen by putting some of them to death. He therefore insisted that six of the chief citizens should come, bare-headed and bare-foot, with ropes about their necks, to present him the keys of the town and castle. This spread con- sternation among the inhabitants; but the gloom was dispelled by a generous patriot, named Eustace of St. Pierre, who offered himself as a devoted victim to appease the anger of the British monarch, and whose example was soon followed by five others. They approached the English camp, and, after delivering the keys, the governor pre- sented his sword to Edward, begging mercy for the citizens. The king appeared inflexible, rejected the intercession of his barons, and even sent for the executioner, when Queen Philippa, who had just arrived from England, threw herself on her knees before her nus- band, and, by tears and supplications, obtained the deliverance of the unfortunate townsmen. Edward then took possession of Calais, which, after expelling the majority of the natives, he repeopled with a colony of his own subjects. It soon became the continental mart for British merchandise, and remained in possession of the English for more than two centuries. While the English monarch was gaining victories upon the conti- nent, the Scots, taking advantage of his absence, invaded the fron- tiers with a numerous army headed by David Bruce, their king, (iueen Philippa, who had not yet set out from England, seeing the danger, prepared to repel it by a sudden and vigorous effort. She mustered all the forces that circumstances had left at her disposal, and sent them against the Scottish army, which they met at a place called Nevil's Cross, near Durham. A sharp contest ensued, which soon ended in the total defeat of the Scots. Fifteen thousand of them were cut to pieces; the others were routed, and driven from the field; the king himself was taken prisoner, and conducted with many oi Lis nobles and knights to the tower of London. Tims were the arms of Edward every where successful ; but these advantages had been purchased by enormous expenses, and with the loss, it is said, of fifty thousand Englishmen. This consideration in- duced him to consent to a truce with Philip, who, owing to the de- ranged state of his affairs, had still greater need of a respite than the English monarch. Through the mediation of Pope Clement VI, the truce was concluded between the two kings, at first for a few months, but afterwards foi six years. 310 MODEEN HISTORY. [PART 6. No step cojid have been taken more useful and necessary than this to both nations. Ahnost immediately after the conclusion of peace France and England were visited by a pestilence as general and de- Btructive as any recorded in history. It had broken out in the centre of Asia, whence it gradually proceeded towards the West, and pervaded the different countries of Europe. Of the victims of the plague, many expired in the course of six hours, and few lingered more than two or three days. Although it can scarcely be credited, as some nave asserted, that the mortality carried off one-half or one third of the human race, we may however judge of its frightful ravages, from the fact that all the cemeteries in London were soon filled, and the number of the dead in the great hospital of Paris amounted to the daily average of five hundred. This awful calamity was generally regarded as a punishment from heaven, and had the happy effect of bringing multitudes of sinners to a sense of their duty. At the same time the whole continent, from Calabria to the north of Poland, was shaken by a succession of earthquakes. During these occurrences. King Philip died on the twenty-second of April, 1350, leaving behind^ him the reputation of a brave, but imprudent, of a tolerably good, but not very talented prince. It was his misfortune to have to contend with so able a monarch as Edward III. Yet, notwithstanding his disasters and losses, France made under his reign the important acquisition of the province of Dauphiny, which was ceded by Humbert II, its last sovereign, under the easy condition that the eldest son of every French king should have the title and name of Dauphin; a condition which was faithfully ad- hered to during five centuries. § II. EDWARD III AND JOHN IL— a. r. 1350—1364. Philip was succeeded on the throne by his son, John II, formerly called duke of Normandy. The success which this prince had ob- tained in the previous war of Guienne, his experience, and the ma- turity of his age which was about forty years, seemed to promise a much happier reign than that of his father : quite the contrary how- ever happened; a valor not guided by prudence, plunged the new monarch and his kingdom into an abyss of misfortunes, and prepared new triumphs for England. The truce concluded between Edward and Philip being now ended, nostihties recommenced. The prince of Wales, Edward, also cai.ed the Black Prince (from the color of his arms), opened the campaign. He set out with his troops from Bordeaux, and laid waste all the sur- A. D. 1350 — 1364.] EDWARD III. AND JOHN II. 311 rounding country. The year following (1356), he did the same, and advanced into the very heart of France,-destroying the crops, slaugh- tering the cattle, reducing to ashes the farm-houses, towns and vil- lages, and subjecting the natives to all the horrors of war,^ until the sudden approach of King John with an army of sixty thousand men admonished him to retire. But it was now to late; he found himself overtaken at Maupertuis, near Poitiers, and all he could do was to occupy a strong position upon an eminence in the midst of vineyards. Could the remembrance of Crecy have checked the presumptuous precipitation of the French, the English prince would not have been able to escape an entire overthrow. His troops were six or seven times less numerous than those of his opponent; they had scarcely provisions for one day more; nor could they attempt to leave their camp, without manifest danger of being immediately surrounded. Well aware of the perplexing circumstance, young Edward had re- course to negotiations. He offered to restore his conquests, his booty and his captives, promising moreover not to bear arms against France for the space of seven years. His offers were rejected ; and the French, instead of letting famine force the English to surrender, rushed upon them as an assured prey, with their usual imprudence and tumultuous hurry. The event could not have been more disgraceful for the assailants and disastrous for France. The cavalry, having entangled themselves among the vineyards and hedges with which the spot was covered, were easily overthrown by the English archers : the second line be- gan also to waver, and soon fled with precipitation, thus permitting the Black Prince to advance at the head of his cavalry, and charge with immense advantage the division of infantry commanded by the French king in person. Here the combat grew fierce and obstinate. John, animated by despair, maintained for a while the unequal con- test, and, by the terrible strokes of his battle-axe, slew or wounded those who ventured within his reach. But his strength soon failed him. He was wounded in the face, beaten to the ground, and finally taken prisoner with his youngest son Philip, who, dunng the engage- ment, had fought like the most hardy warrior to save his father's life. Such was the ever memorable battle of Poitiers, in which a hand ful of Englishmen defeated the whole chivalry of France, and, be- sides covering the field of battle with five or six thousand slain, took fifteen thousand prisoners. The moderation of young Edward, after BO splendid a victory, increased the admiration which his conduct in • See in Dr. Lingard (vol. iv. pp. 136 — 137) another dreadful instance of the same inhumanity, and the just animadversion of the historian against this cruel manner of waging war, which has left a blot on Ute memory of the princo of Wales. 312 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 6. battle had inspired. He soothed the affliction of his royal captive, waited on him at table, and in every particular behaved towards him with all possible courtesy and respect. The next morning he con- tinued his march with his army and his prisoners to Bordeaux; and, having concluded a truce for two years with the dauphin Charles, regent of France during the captivity of the king, returned from Guienne to England. He was received in London with extra- ordinary magnificence, which, though apparently intended to honor the French monarch, was easily referred by all to tiie conqueror of Poitiers. To have taken two kings prisoners at the same lime, was certainly a glorious achievement; but mere glory did not satisfy Edward III, who used every means in his power to turn his victories to the best advantage. A considerable tribute to be paid for a certain number of ■ years, was the condition on which the Scottish king obtained his liberty. The adjustment of the rival claims of England and France was infinitely more difficult, the pretensions of Edward being so high and so excessive, as to be unanimously and indignantly rejected by the French government. This refusal however appeared little in accordance with the existing state of affairs, as nothing can be con- ceived more distressing and deplorable than the condition to which that kingdom was now reduced. The mourning, humiliation and losses occasioned by the defeats at Sluys, Crecy and Poitiers; the dauphin left without resources; his authority disregarded; parties and dissensions springing up in several provinces; civil wars raging between the nobles and the peasants, who threw on each other the blame of the national calamities; troops of marauders destroying what had been spared by war and pestilence: every thing contributed to spread desolation over France. In order, as it were, to give the final blow to the tottering monarchy, just at this juncture, the Eng- lish king resolved to renew the war, and, landing in the north, recommenced hostilities with the most numerous and best appointed army that had been raised in England for more than a hundred years. To meet this emergency, the dauphin wisely deviated from the course hitherto followed by the French monarchs. Knowing, from experience, the danger of general engagements with soldiers so in- trepid and hardy as the English, he commanded the leaders of his troops to avoid every kind of battle, and rather to shut themselves up m towns and fortresses, with their supplies of provisions. These measures were perfectly successful. Edward, as he advanced, found a country in which his army could hardly subsist. Having no occa- sion to fight in the open field, he attacked the cities of Rheims and Paris; but he failed in both attempts, and was compelled, in a short A. D. 1364 — 1380.] EDWARD III. AND CHARLES V. 313 dme, by the scarcity of provisions and the severity of the weather, to retire towards Bretaghe. The retreat of the English was like that of vanquished troops endeavoring to escape the pursuit of a victorious enemy. In the neighborhood of Chartres^ a frightful storm burst upon their camp. The tents were carried away by the violence of the wind ; and the clouds poured down showers of rain mixed with hail-stones of a prodigious size, which crushed to death men and horses. At the sight of the evils occasioned by his obstinacy and ambition, the king, in a moment of remorse, made a vow not to reject any longer honorable conditions of peace. Accordingly, the negotiations for a treaty were resumed, and it was concluded at Bretigni on terms somewhat less rigorous for France than had been proposed before. Edward consented to renounce his pretensions to the French crown, and to restore a part of his conquests ; still, he kept full possession of several provinces, and demanded a ransom of three million crowns of gold to be paid for the French monarch within the space of six years. These conditions were ratified by both parties, and John was at length liberated (a. d. 1360). He did not long enjoy his liberty. Notwithstanding his perfect sincerity, which no man ever questioned, he found it an easier mat- ter to promise than to peribrm, being unable to raise the stipulated sums at the time appointed for each instalment. On this account, and in consequence of other difficulties arising from the treaty of Bretigni, John determined to give himself up again to his conqueror, saying that, "If honor were banished from every other place, it should find an asylum in the breasts of kings." He actually returned to London, where he died after a few weeks, in 1364. § III. EDWARD III AND CHARLES V.— a. d. 13G4— 1380. The death of John at first made no change in the existing relations between France and England; and the dauphin, now King Charles V, had sufficient time to restore perfect tranquility in his kingdom. The best measure adopted by him for this purpose, was first to deliver his people from a large body of military adventurers, who after having followed the standard of Edward III during the war, sub- sisted, in time of peace, by plundering the French territories. Many fruitless attempts had been made to get rid of those companies of for- midable banditti ; at length Charles succeeded, through the means of hii? celebrated general Du Guesclin, in inducing them to undertake 27 814 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 6. an expedition into Spain, on tiie ground that their exertions might be extremely useful to that country and to themselves. The kingdom of Castile was then groaning under the tyrannical Bway of Don Pedro, son and successor of Alfonso XL That prince, justly surnamed tlie cruel, on account of his vindictive and ferocious spirit, ascended the throne in 1350, at the age of fifteen, and nmrked each succeeding year by dreadful executions, the effect of his ambi- tion, caprice or barbarous profligacy. The most illustrious of his victims was his virtuous queen, Blanche de Bourbon, a French princess, who is believed to have perished by poison. Don Henry, earl of Transtamare, and half-brother to Don Pedro, being exposed to a similar fate, fled to Paris, where he entered into a confederacy with the French court to punish the murderer of Blanche. Accordingly, the bands of adventurers just mentioned, in addition to other bodies of troops under the conduct of Du Guesclin, entered Spain in 1366, and rapidly marching through the kingdom of Arra gon, placed Don Henry on the throne of Castile without fighting ? battle. It was in vain that Pedro summoned his military tenants* they rejoiced at his distress; and he had no other resource than to throw himself on board a vessel, which carried him safely to Ba- yonne, whence he proceeded to Bordeaux, the capital of the British possessions in France, and the residence of the prince of Wales. The heart of this young prince was moved by the astonishing, though merited, misfortune of Don Pedro. He readily espoused his cause, and, in order to replace him on the throne, led into Castile a gallant army, with which he attacked the enemy near Navarette. After a sharp contest, Don Henry was put to flight, Du Guesclin, was taken prisoner, and Pedro, without further obstacle, again assumed the sceptre. Unfortunately for the Castilian monarch, adversity, instead of im- proving, had rather exasperated his disposition. He soon returned to his former cruel course; and for the benefits bestowed upon him by young Edward, returned nothing but ingratitude, delaying, under various pretences, to make him the necessary indemnification for the expenses of the war. In the mean time, the victorious troops of his aUies began to waste away, both through want of provisions and the heat of the climate ; and the constitution of the British prince him- self was considerably impaired. Equally indignant and alarmed, Edward abandoned the ungrateful monarch, and returned with his army through the kingdom of Navarre to his own territories. This circumstance permitted Don Henry and Du Guesclin, who had recovered his liberty, to re-enter Spain with fresh troops, in i368. They defeated Don Pedro in several battles, in one of which he lost fifty thousand Moors, who had enlisted in his service ; and A. D. 1364 — 1380.] EDWARD HI. AND CHARLES V. 315 ihey soon closely besieged him in the castle of Montiel. He endeavored to make his escape during the night, but was arrested and brought to the tent of a French officer, where, either through accident oi design, he was met by his brother and rival. "They immediately grappled with each other; Pedro threw Henry on the floor, and Henry, in the struggle, despatched his adversary with a poniard." Being thus once more seated on the throne, the new king of Castile showed his gratitude to his benefactor and faithful ally, Charles V, by concluding with him an alliance offensive and defensive, and pro- mising him assistance in vessels and troops, in case of a new war against Edward III. This war occurred very soon ; the subjects of complaint between the two rival nations had been, since the death of John II, continually increasing, and his successor was at length induced to answer the lofty demands of his opponents by a declaration of war. The British possessions in France were entered by hostile armies, whose rapid progress was aided. by the disaffection of the natives against a foreign government. Careful to avoid a general batde, the French extended their conquests by capturing towns, and securing them with strong fortresses and garrisons. They had, it is true, to contend against the powerful reinforcements continually sent from England for the defence of her transmarine dominions; but circumstances were now totally changed. While the English mo- narch, now in an advanced age, was leading an indolent life, and the prince of Wales hngering under a disease which he had contracted m Spain, the wisdom of Charles and the activity of Du Gueschn constantly improved their former success. The troops of Sir Robert Knolles, stationed on the borders of Bretagne, were put to flight. A fresh and numerous army, commanded by the duke of Lancaster, was almost entirely destroyed, either by continual skirmishes, or by the fatigues of the march and the inconveniences of the season. In one place, the famous Enghsh general Chandos lost his life; in another, the Captal de Buch, one of the best officers in the service of Edward, was taken prisoner; and, in 1372, the Brhish vessels, car- rying supplies to the continent, were all sunk or captured near La Rochelle, by a Spanish fleet which King Henry had, according to his promise, sent to the assistance of the French. By this series of disasters and losses, the English found themselves compelled to ask for a truce, which was granted, and, at short inter- valSj repeatedly prolonged for some years. They were now deprived of nearly all their ancient possessions in France, and of all their late conquests except the town of Calais. In 1376, they sustained an irreparab'.e loss by the death of Edward, prince of Wales, and one year later, the king, his father, followed him to the grave, at the age of sixty-five years, during fifty of which he had occupied the throne. 816 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 6. "In personal accomplishments," says Dr. Lingard, ''Edward III is said to have been superior; in mental powers, to have been equal to any of his predecessors. More than usual care had been bestowed on his education: and he could not only speak the English and French, but also understand the German and Latm languages. His elocution was graceful; his conversation entertaining; his behaviol dignified, but also attractive. To the fashionable amusements of hunt- ing and hawking he was much addicted : but to these he preferred the more warlike exercises of tournament : and his subjects, at the con- clusion of the exhibition, often burst into transports of applause, when they found that the unknown knight, whose prowess they had admired, proved to be their own sovereign. Of his courage as a combatant, and his abilities as a general, the reader will have formed a competent opinion from the preceding pages. The astonishing victories, which cast so much glory on one period of his reign, appear to have dazzled the.eyes both of his subjects and of foreigners, who placed him in the first rank of conquerors : but the disasters which clouded the evening of his life, have furnished a proof that his ambition was greater than his judgment. He was at last convinced that the crowns of France and Scotland were beyond his reach; but not till he had exhausted the strength of the nation by a series of gigantic but fruitless eflforts. Before his death, all his conquests, with the exception of Calais, had slipped from his grasp : the greater part of his hereditary dominions on the continent, had been torn from him by a rival, whom he formerly despised : and a succession of short and precarious truces was sought and accepted as a boon by the monarch, who in his more fortunate days, had dictated the peace of Bretigni."* Three years after the death of Edward, Charles V, king of France, also died, leaving his kingdom as prosperous and happy, as he had found it deslressed and miserable. In the space of sixteen years, he had, by his consummate prudence, checked the calamities and repaired the evils of the two preceding reigns. Instead of rashly exposing his own person in battle, as his father and grand-father had done, he confided, the command of his armies to generals equally brave and cautious, and through them waged war with uninterrupted success, he himself directing from his cabinet the chief operations of "their campaigns. Nor was his prudence less admirable in his civil, than in his military administration. Good order was re-established m the difierent branches of government; peace was restored to the capital and the provinces ; offices of trust v/ere filled by men of welj known merit and integrity; the king himself gave to all the example * Lini^ard's Hhtory of England, iy,pp. 147 — 149. A. D. 1300 — 1396.] OTTOMAN EMPIRE. 817 of sincere piety, purity of morals, charity to the poor, and fidelity to the laws of God and of the Church. At his accession to the throne^ having found the coffers of the exchequer empty, he replenished them, not by the augmentation of the taxes, which he on the con- trary diminished, but by a wise administration of the pubhc revenues. (t was thus that Charles was enabled to deliver France from powerful invaders; to assist his allies; to make his people happy; to protect die arts, sciences and commerce ; to lay the foundation of the famous royal library in Paris ; in a word, constantly to exemplify the truth of his own maxim: "That kings are happy, only because they have the power of doing good." His subjects bestowed on him the flat- tering epithet of " The Wise," and posterity has always pronounced aim one of the greatest kings that ever sat on the throne of France. He was succeeded by his son Charles VI. Richard II, son of the Black Prince, began to reign about the same time, in the place of his grand-father Edward III. RISE or THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE, AND ITS PROGRESS, TILL THE BATTLE OF NICOPOLIS.— a. d. 1300—1396 We must now turn our attention to the east of Europe, where a new and formidable enemy began to make his appearance. The fourteenth century beheld the rise and progress of the savage and warlike nation of the Ottomans, who were destined to sweep from the face of the earth the last vestiges of Roman power. Fresh hordes of Turks, eager to walk in the footsteps of their ancestors, were continually pouring from Tartary over the fairest provinces of Asia — restless and uncivilized tribes, who hardly knew how to pro- cure the necessaries of life otherwise than by w^ar and pillage. After the fall of the Seljukian Turks of Iconium, these barbarians occupied their possessions in Asia Minor, under the conduct of seven indepen- dent chieftains commonly called emirs. The most skilful and powerful of these chieftains was Othman, from whom the Turks have derived the name of Ottomans. His valor and activity soon enabled him to prevail over the petty princes by whom he was surrounded; he rendered himself master of a great part of Bithynia ; and continued his victorious career for the space of twenty-seven years (a. d. 1300 — 1326). His plan of aggrandize- ment was successfully followed by Orcan, his son and successor. Whilst the degenerate Greeks were continually weakening themselves by civil dissensions and wars, the well combined forces of the Turks daily increased the extent and strength of their empire. They cap- 27* 318 MODEKN HISTORY. [PART 6. tured, in a short lime, the cities of Prusiurrij Nicomedia and Nice, and, crossing the strait of Constantinople, began to carry their victo rious arras into Europe. Many important places of Thrace, and even the city of Adrianople, had already fallen into their powei, when Orcan died, in 1360. Amurat, who was the third sultan (sovereign) of the Turks, con- solidated the throne his two predecessors had reared, by organiz- ing the intrepid band of the Janizaries, whose number amounted, in different times, from ten to forty thousand; a body resembling, in al- most every respect, that of the Praetorians at Rome under the empe- rors, and of the Mamelukes in Egypt since the time of Saladin, A regular and gallant troop of cavalry, called Spahis, had already been established by Orcan ; it was subsequently improved by Amurat. This monarch, having chosen Adrianople for the seat of his resi- dence, kept, from that city, a watchful eye on the conduct of the neighboring states, in order to turn all their proceedings to his own advantage; for, although he was, we are told, a great admirer of virtue and lover of justice, yet he lost no opportunity to gratify his ambition. Hence his reign, which lasted twenty-nine years (a. d, 1360 — 1389), was little else than a continual warfare, and was ren- dered famous by thirty-seven victories, the last of which, however, proved more fatal to himself than to his numerous enemies, the Hun garians, Servians, and other nations of eastern Europe, who had united their forces to oppose his progress. After the battle, as he was visiting the plain covered with the dead and dying, a Servian soldier, that lay among the rest, suddenly arose, ana with a dagger stabbed the sultan, who expired in two hours, in the midst of his officers. The next sultan, Bajazet I, is well known in history under the surname of Ilderim (lightning); an epithet which he fully deserved by the rapidity of his conquests, and the uncommon quickness with which he continually passed from Europe to Asia, and from Asia to Europe. He assembled and marshalled his forces, separated and re-united them with incredible activity ; he would disappear for a time, and suddenly appear again when he was thought to be at a distance. Still Bajazet sometimes met with enemies no less brave and skilful than himself; and his life presented a constant alternation of brilliant victories and overwhelming defeats. His efforts were at first directed against several petty sovereigns of Armenia and Asia Minor, who were all easily subdued. He then turned his attention to a more powerful and warlike opponent, Ste- phen, prince of Moldavia, Avho had, two years before, defeated in a great battle the generals of Amurat, the father of Bajazet. Anxious to restore the honor of the Turkish name, Bajazet marched rapidly through the province of Thrace, crossed the Danube and entered the A. D. 1300 — 1396.] OTTOMAN EMPIRE. 319 territory of his enemy, a warrior as eager as himself for the meeting. After a fierce conflict, the Moldavians were routed; and their leader, who was the last to quit the field of battle, fled towards Nols, a for- tified town, where he had left his mother and children. He found the gates closed against him by his mother's command. From the top of the ramparts, this courageous woman upbraided him for his flight, and bade him return, renew the fight, and, if he could not conquer, rather die than survive hisdefeat. This revived at onco the courage and hopes of Stephen; he immediately returned, rallied about twelve thousand men, and rushed upon the Turks who were then engaged in pillaging, with such impetuosity and vigor, that nearly all were cut in pieces; the imperial tent, with a considerable booty, fell into the power of the Moldavians; and the proud sultan precipitately retired to the extremities of his dominions. He soon reappeared, more fierce and formidable than ever. Thrace, Greece and other provinces were overrun and laid waste by his armies; and if, for reasons of policy and prudence, he did not yet attack Constantinople, he at least made the suburbs of that city the limits of the Greek empire. The reigning imperial family was treated by him with the utmost contempt. New fortifications having been added to the capital by the emperor John Paleologus, Bajazet was displeased, and sent an order for their demolition, which order Paleologus obeyed. The next emperor Manuel, received from the haughty sultan a command to remain in Constantinople: he complied with the injunction, leaving the city but once, in order to appear at the court of Bajazet, which he did at the risk of his life; for his preservation he was indebted to the generous commiseration of a Turkish oflScer. He then wrote pressing letters to the Christian sovereigns of Europe, for the purpose of imploring their assistance against the incessant encroachments of the Turks; and his example was imitated by Sigismond, king of Hungary, who was not less anxious to remove the impending storm from his frontiers. I'hese letters and solicitations had little effect, except in France, which furnished a large number of soldiers and knights under the command of the earl of Nevers, a prince of the royal family. They marched through Bavaria, and joined, near the Danube, the Hun- garians commanded by Sigismond, whose forces then amounted to upwards of a hundred thousand men. When he reviewed them, he is said to have exclaimed, in a transport of confidence and joy, that *'if the firmament itself should fall, they might support it with their lances." His hopes, however, were grounded more on appear- ances than on reality; for, if bravery was the distinguishing charac- ter of his followers, discord, jealousy, presumption and licentiousness also reigned among them ; and Bajazet showed greater foresight than 320 MODERN HISTORY. [PART Sigismond, when on being informed of these disorders, he said thai his enemies would surely provoke against themselves the justice of their God. After some partial engagements, in which the Christians constantly prevailed over the Turks, they commenced a general battle near the city of Nicopolis in Bulgaria (a. d. 1396). When the two armies approached, Sigismond entreated the French to unite prudence with valor against an enemy with whose mode of warfare they were not sufficiently acquainted. The advice was good, but given to no pur- pose, the earl of Nevers and other young lords imagining that it was the intention of Sigismond to deprive them of the honor of beginning the battle. They therefore, without waiting for the Hungarians, rushed on against the first squadrons of the Turks with equal disorder and intrepidity. The enemy pretended to be terrified, and fled^ the French pursued them, with full confidence of an easy victory, when, on a sudden, they found themselves not only surrounded by numerous bands of Spahis and Janizaries, whom Bajazet had placed in am- buscade, but also entangled amidst an incredible quantity of stakes which had been purposely planted in order to embarrass their march, so that the Christian cavalry could neither advance nor retire. Resolved at least to sell their lives as dearly as possible, they continued fighting with undaunted valor, and for several hours spread terror and death among the thickest battalions of the Turks. At length, sinking un- der^ the weight of fatigue, and overpowered by the multitudes ol their opponents, they fell, almost all, under the Ottoman sword; the remaining few were taken prisoners. Bajazet immediately led all his forces against the main body of the confederates, put them to flight, and entered their camp, where his soldiers found invaluable riches. Sigismond seeing every thing lost, threw himself into a boat, and following the course of the Danube, and then the coasts of the E-uxine sea, succeeded, after many adven- tures, in reaching the imperial city of- Constantinople, where his ar- rival as a fugitive announced his defeat and spread consternation All trembled at the approach of the victorious sultan; the Greek capital was more than ever threatened with an attack, and would pro- bably have become an easy prey to the Turks, had not its downfall been delayed by the sudden appearance of another ccuqueror far superior to Bajazet nimself. n! A. D. 1396 — 1405.] TAMERLANE, ETC. 821 TAMERLANE AND THE MOGULS.— a. d. 1396—1405. BATTLE OF ANCYRA. — 1402. TiMUR, belter known by the name of Tamerlane, had been raised, amidst the confusion of civil wars, from the station of a petty sove- reign to the throne of the Moguls and Tartars, in the year 1369. He soon re-established, by his indefatigable activity and courage, the vast empire of Genghis-Kan in Asia. History pan scarcely follow him through his gigantic expeditions; and the imagination itself Ls astounded at the rapidity with which he carried his destructive sword from the centre of Tartary to the borders of Egypt, and from the river Indus to the frozen deserts of Siberia. Such was the man whom Providence destined to crush the pride, and overthrow the power of Bajazet. Historians are not unanimous in explaining the motives which induced these two mighty princes to turn their arms against each other. It is generally supposed that the complaints of the Greek emperor and of the Mussulman princes of Asia, against the encroach- ments of Bajazet, were the chief motive of Tamerlane's conduct on this occasion ; but it might also be sufficiently accounted for by the character of the two rivals. In the opinion of the Tartar monarch, it was neither proper nor possible that the world could be governed by two sovereigns of equal power; nor was the Turkish sultan infe- rior to him in point of ambition. This clearly appears from the scornful and arrogant invectives in which they indulged against each other, before hostilities commenced, and which became the signal of the most bloody catastrophe. Tamerlane set out from the East at the head of his intrepid Tar- tars ; and, as if he had resolved to give Bajazet an idea of the ravages that every where accompanied his armies, he made their march across Armenia and Syria one continued military expedition. These unfortunate countries, so often before the theatre of disastrous war- fare, were again laid waste, their riches seized, their cities destroyed, iheir inhabitants slaughtered; streams of blood, and towers built with human bodies and skulls, every where marked the passage of the Mogul conqueror. At length, the Tartars directed their course towards the Turkish dominions. Tamerlane marched through Anatolia with eight hun- dred thousand men, whilst Bajazet, on his side, fea'lessly advanced to meet him, at the head of four hundred thousand brave soldiers. These formidable armies came in sight near Ancyra (July 1102), 822 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 6. and there, through the whole exvent of a vast plain, engaged in a conflict more furious and frightful than even imagination can picture. It lasted three days, and cost the Hves, according to the lowest calcu- lation, of one hundred and eighty thousand, according to others, of three hundred and forty, or even four hundred thousand of the com- batants. Victory at last decided in favor of the Tartars. The re- maining Turks were dispersed; and the sultan, after he had fought till the last moment with desperate valor, was surrounded by a host of enemies eager to secure so important a prize, and, in spite of all his efforts, became their prisoner. Not only different, but even contradictory, are the' accounts given of the manner in which Bajazet was treated by Tamerlane. The more probable, as being founded on the testimony of most of the his- torians who wrote near that time, is that the Mogul prince received his captive into his own tent with great kindness and regard, and, making him sit by bis side on the same carpet, spoke to him in the most consoling terms; but that Bajazet, far from being graieful for this noble and generous reception, evinced no other feeling than that of ferocious haughtiness and impotent rage, which deeply offended his conqueror. To the question put by Tamerlane, *' what he would have done, if fortune had been favorable to him?'' he answered, " I would have confined you in an iron cage." — " Let such, then, be your own mansion," replied Tamerlane. The sentence was enforced, and Bajazet, unable to bear the excess of his misfortune, died one or two years after, some say, of grief and despair, others, of apoplexy. His sons were permitted to divide, or rather to dispute among themselves the wrecks of his empire, and the Mogul conqueror returned to his own dominions. It may not be amiss to describe here more fully the character of this extraordinary prince. By the oriental nations, Tamerlane is assimilated to Alexander-lhe-Great; and the renowned biographer Feller, in his Historical Dictionai-y (article Tamerlane), seems to approve of that idea, which he even endeavors to confirm by some examples. The comparison may be true with respect to exploits and military abilities; but, in many other particulars, it is certainly false. Alexander was ambitious, without being naturally cruel ; whilst, on the contrary, nothing can be conceived more barbarous than the manner in which Tamerlane conducted his wars, and treated those who presumed to resist. By his orders, seventy thou- sand persons were inhumanly slaughtered in the capture of Ispahan; one hundred and twenty thousand in that of Sebaste ; ninety thou- sand in that of Bagdad, which city Was utterly destroyed; and so, proportionally, in other places. In the conquest of India, the natives were hunted like wild beasts, and it is no exaggeration to say that A. D. 1896 — l-iOo.] TAMERLANE, ETC. 323 miilions of them were put to the sword, the multitude of prisoners being moreover so great, that each of the Tartar soldiers had many on his power. On one occasion, Tamerlane caused a hundred thou- sand of those unhappy captives to be slain in the space of an hour; on another, he commanded multitudes of unfortunate people to be crushed under the feet of horses, or to be buried alive; and, besides, he invariably kept up the horrid custom, which we have already men- tioned, of building towers with human skulls, as monuments of his victories.* Never assuredly were there deeds of cruelty so awful and so multiplied, perpetrated either by Alexander-the-Great, or any other conqueror except Tamerlane. It is truly astonishing that the man who could commit such atroci- ties in war, displayed, in the other transactions of his life, justice, generosity and sensibility. Equitable in his judgments, and zealous in the correction of abuses, he was kind towards his relations, atten- tive to the welfare of his troops and careful to reward their services, humane towards all his subjects and desirous of their happiness, particularly towards the close of his career. ^' I do not wish," he once said to his counsellors, " that the distressed and the poor should cry out for vengeance against me on the day of judgment. I do not wish that any one of my brave soldiers, who have so many times exposed their hves in my service, should have to complain of me and of my ingratitude. I am more sensible of their wants than they are themselves. None of my subjects ought to hesitate to lay his grievances before me; for, my intention is that the world should, under my reign, become a sort of Paradise ; and I know that, when a king is just and beneficent, his kingdom is blessed with prosperity and glory," Such was the language in which Tamerlane expressed the noble feelings of his soul in relation to the government of his people. In point of intellectual faculties, to a sound mind, that distinguished him in council as much as his extraordinary valor distinguished him in battles, he is said to have added a wonderful sagacity, which enabled him to unravel the most hidden intrigues and detect the most artful stratagems of his enemies, whilst his own secrets remained impenetrable. His principle in governing was to secure by unshaken firmness the execution of his orders, and to attend in person to all transactions of consequence. The palaces, mosques, cities, bridges, canals, magnificent roads, colleges, hospitals for the infirm, for tra- * These, and other particulars respecting Tamerlane, may be seen»in Umvers. Hist. vol. XLvni,pp. 220 — 468; — Anqueti., Prexis de VHist. Uni- vers. vol. iv, pp. 44(i — 466;— Michaut, Hist.des Croisades, vol. \',pp. 289 — 292 ; — and Anieilhon (the continuator of Lebeau), Hist, du Bas,-E:npir^, vol. XXVI, pp. 362 — 367- 824: MODERN HISTORY. [PART 6. Tellers and for the poor, aiid many other public buildings and institu lions, which owed to him their existence, would suffice to illustrate the reigns and the lives of several monarchs. Tamerlane preserved, till the end of his days, a robust constitution, great bodily strength, and astonishing fortitude. He disliked flattery, and, instead of being offended by correction and advice, required that the truth, plain and entire, should be spoken to himj the motto on his seal was, "I am candid and sincere.'' A friend to learning, he frequently read history, and liked to converse with skilful men. In fine, a very extraordinary feature in this mighty sovereign and con- queror, was the singular modesty which he evinced in the midst of his triumphs, not ascribing them to his own exertions and talents, but to the omnipotence of God, who made use of him to chastise nations and to recall them to the path of justice. He believed, as a zealous Mussulman, that he was called to redress grievances, and to exterminate the abettors of all religions contrary to his own ; and we have seen in what an awful manner he complied with this imaginary mission. After the successful termination of his campaign against the Turks^ his advanced age and protracted labors seemed to call for repose ; yet, even at that time, he meditated new conquests. In a fresh transport of Mahometan zeal, he determined to attack the Chinese, and for this purpose he set out with two hundred thousand men, in the dead of winter, from Samarcand, his capital city; but, being seized with a violent fever, he expired before he had reached the con- fines of China, in the seventy-first year of his age, and thirty-sixth of his reign (a. d. 1405). His death was soon followed by the divi- sion of his vast empire into many principalities and kingdoms, the most remarkable of which was that of the Moguls in the East Indies, now under the sway of the British government. RENEWAL OF WAR BETY/EEN ENGLAND ANQ. FRANCE. The condition of England and France was mucii alike during the latter portion of the fourteenth, but became quite different in the beginning of the fifteenth century. The two young kings, Richard II and Charles VI, showed good intentions, and even, on many occasions, displayed great spirit and courage; but the ambition of three uncles (in England, the dukes of Lancaster, Gloucester and York — and in France, the dukes of Berry, Anjou and Burgundy), A. D. 1413 — 1422.] HENRY V. AND CHAKLES VI. 325 was for both of them a constant source of misfortunes, and occasioned many disturbances in the two kingdoms. England however suffered less, and not only was the first to reco- ver from her losses, but even quickly reassumed her former ascen- dency and menacing attitude, in consequence of the great internal strength which she acquired under the prosperous reign of Henry IV, first king of the house of Lancaster, who had, in 1399, dethroned and succeeded his cousin Richard II. France, on the contrary, saw her misfortunes increase; especially after Charles VI began to expe- rience frequent fits of insanhy. Each one of the princes of his family wished to hold the reins of government; their disputes gave rise to a long train of dissensions and animosities which terminated in the murder of several of their number, and daily added to the misery of the whole nation ; nor did England fail to turn these disturbances of France to her own advantage. § I. HENRY V AND CHARLES VI. (a. d. 1413—1422). Henry V, son and successor of Henry IV, is represented by historians as a prince sagacious in council, skilled in military tactics, and one of the bravest knights of his age. He had, more seriously than any of his predecessors, conceived and matured the design of subduing the French monarchy, which, after the example of Edward III, he affected to claim as his inheritance. Having raised a gallant army, he landed at Harfleur, on the 14th of August 1415, before the French were ready to oppose his invasion. The town was invested; and after a courageous resistance of five weeks, its garrison was obliged to surrender. The siege however had cost Henry many officers and men, and a dysentery soon reduced his forces to nearly half their number; in this situation, unable to adopt offensive measures, he determined to retire to Calais, whence he might safely re-embark for England. But to carry out this resolution was a very difficult task: there were no bridges over the rivers; and an army of one hundred thou- sand French soldiers, five times more numerous than that of their opponents, had been stationed between the EngHsh and Calais. At Agmcourt, on the 24th of October, Henry saw himself in tbe very same condition in which Edward III and the prince of Wales had been, the former seventy, the latter sixty years before; and, like them, he gave the world a new proof how much a skilful commander and a few well disciplined troops can effect against a multitude of undis- ciplined v/arriors. In his camp and armv, perfect order was observed, 28 826 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 6. and ready obedience paid to the commands of their gallant leader; on the side of his enemies, notwithstanding some wise dispositions of the commander-in-chief, the constable d'Alore:, all was confusion, insubordination and temerity. The night previous to the battle was spent by the English in religious exercises; by the French, who did not suspect the possibility of a defeat, in tumultuous merriment. The result, as might naturally be expected, was the complete triumph ot the former, and the entire overthrow of the latter, twenty -four thou- sand of whom, including the chief leaders and twelve princes, paid with death or captivity, the forfeit of their rash and presumptuous courage. The conquerors referred with gratitude to Almighty God the honor of so signal and astonishing a victory ; the 11 3th psalm was sung in thanksgiving after the battle; and it was an edifying spectacle to behold the king and the whole army prostrate themselves at these words of the Royal Prophet, '' JVot to us , O Lord, not to us; but to thy name give glory." The defeat of Agincourt was still more fatal to France than the disastrous battles of Crecy and Poitiers. The road was now opened into the heart of that kingdom; and Henry V was both too ambitious and too skilful, not to follow up his advantage with incessant ardor. This was his chief and almost exclusive object during the subsequent years, and success crowned his new efforts even beyond expectation. Within a short time, Normandy and the neighboring provinces were subdued; town after town surrendered; Paris itself, the constant theatre of turbulent factions, opened its gates to the conqueror ; and King Charles VI, whose mental powers were almost totally pros- trated, was induced to take the English monarch for his son-in-law, and, contrary to the fundamental rules of inheritance in France, to appoint him his successor. The dauphin Charles, who was heir apparent to the crown, appealed from this illegal disinherison to GocI and to the sword. After the death of his unfortunate and cruelly misled father, in 1422, he caused himself to be acknowledged sove- reign in all the provinces situated on the south of the river Loire, the others being occupied by the English and their partisans, who called him, through mockery. King of Bourges. The same year witnessed also the prem.ature death of his formidable rival, Henry V, who had not reached his thirty-fifth year. This great prince expired on the last day of August, leaving an infant son, Henry VI, who was crowned king of England and France, under the regenc) of his two uncles, the dukes of Gloucester and Bedford. A. D. 1422 — 1453.] HENRY VI. AND CHARLES VII. 327 ^ II. HENRY VI AND CHARLES VII. (a. d. 1422—1453). The important events just mentioned, and the change of the prin- cipal leaders in each party, though uhimately advantageous to France, did not present at first a favorable prospect for that kingdom. The duke of Bedford, a courageous and skilful prince, was determined to effect its entire subjection, and for a time was so successful, that Charles VII, after several defeats, found himself destitute of money, troops and assistance, having but a few knights who remained true to his cause. His situation became still more perplexing, when the English, always advancing in their course of conquest, laid siege to Oileans, the only town that prevented them from crossing with safety the river Loire, and invading the southern provinces (a. d. 1429). On both sides the siege gave rise to innumerable and wonderful exertions of ability and vigor, the resistance being, on all occasions, proportionate to the attack. As, however, the English received fresh supplies of provisions and troops with greater facility than the gar- rison of the place, its fall was confidently anticipated by them, and the most gloomy apprehensions began to prevail in the councils of the French monarch. Charles himself meditated a retreat into the distant county of Provence* when he unexpectedly, and from an extraordinary source, received assistance which revived his hopes, filled his enemies with dismay, and turned forever the tide of success. In a village, on the borders of Lorraine, lived a country girl named Joan, about seventeen years of age, and of irreproachable character. When the hope of saving Orleans was almost abandoned, she presented herself before the governor of Vaucouleurs, and main- tained, with extraordinary confidence, that she was commissioned by heaven to raise the siege of that place, and to procure the coronation of the king in the city of Rheims. Her tone of conviction and her repeated assurances prevailed upon the governor to send her well guarded to Charles; she met the French court at Chinon in Tou- raine. There, whatever may be said by several recent authors in opposition to the multitude of more ancient documents, every precau- tion was taken to avoid even the possibility of illusion or imposture.* Joan underwent a most rigid examination before a committeeof per- sons eminent for their prudence and learifing, and also before the * See Hist, de Joanne d'Arc, 12rao; — Hisl. de VEgl. Bdrant-Bercastel, vol. VIII, pp. .31 — 35 ; — Hist, de VEgl. Gall., dif^cours .s»r la Pvcelle d* Orleans, at tho end of the 16th vol., where the learned author, F. Bcrthier, adduces innumerable evidences, and upwards of twenty contemporary or ahnost con- temporary authors, French, Italian, German, etc. in favoj of Joan d'Arc and of her claim to a divine mission. 828 MODERN" HISTOEY. [PART. 6. courtiers, and tlie king himself; and she constantly gave such marks of sagacity, wisdom, and more than human knowledge, as to cause her claims to a supernatural mission to be very generally admitted. She consequently received the complete armor of a knight, and the liberation of Orleans was intrusted to her charge. The first exploit of Joan was her entrance into the besieged city, and her success in conveying a plentiful and much needed supply ot provisions to the garrison, at the head of which she then successively attacked and carried the strongest posts of the Enghsh. The enemy, dispirited by so many losses, hastily abandoned the siege ; but, being pursued by the heroine, and driven from the towns into which they had retired, they were completely defeated at Patay, with the loss of nearly five thousand men, whilst the French had only one man ol their number killed. Joan had always declared that the object of her mission was two fold, the liberation of Orleans, and the coronation of the king at Rheims. The first of these objects being accomplished, she now urged the execution of the second ; and, though the attempt was a dangerous one, the intermediate country being in possession of the English or of the Burgundians, their allies, she prevailed upon Charles to place full confidence in her promises ; nor was he in any way deceived. As soon as he began his march with twelve thousand men, all obstacles disappeared, or were easily overcome; and the citizens of Rheims, having expelled the Burgundian garrison, re- ceived him with the most flattering demonstrations of joy. The coronation was performed in the usual manner. During the ceremony, Joan, in her warlike dress, and with her banner unfurled stood filled with grateful emotions near the altar; when it was over, she threw herself on her knees, declared her mission accomplished, and with tears solicited leave to return to her country-life; but the king being unwilling to lose her services so soon, she, at his request, consented to remain with the army. Her courage indeed was always the same, but success did not follow her exertions so constantly as before. Having undertaken to defend Compiegne as she had done Orleans, and making a sally at the head of some troops, she fell, notwithstanding her heroic efforts, into the hands of the enemy. The shouts of the English and Burgundians announced her fate to the besieged, whom this melancholy news threw into deep affliction; the place however continued to defy the power of the assailants, and the siege was raised by the approach of a French army (a. d. 1430). The unfortunate maid was treated with neglect by her friends, with cruelty by her enemies. Charles, who owed so much to her, does not seem to have made any efforts to rescue her from captivity; but whether he acted thus^ because he thought his endeavors would A. D. 1422 — 1453.] HENRY VI. AND CHARLES VII. 329 be unavailing, or because he yielded to the jealousy of some of the Courtiers and generals against Joan, is uncertain. The English, Xeasperaied by the repeated defeats and losses she had caused them, resolved to gratify their revenge. For this purpose, nothing, not even the most iniquitous proceeding, was left untried; and, to the eternal disgrace of the duke of Bedford and of the commiitee which ne had appointed, the awful crimes of sacrilege, blasphemy and sorcery were imputed to the heroine who had given constant and undeniable proofs of her piety, as well as innocence and purity of life. Her death was desired ; she was executed at the slake as a sor- ceress, in the market-place of Rouen, before an immense concourse of spectators, who could not restrain their tears. Twenty-five years later, her condemnation was reversed by the archbishop of Rheims and the bishops of Paris and Coutances, whom Pope Calixtus III had designated to revise the mock trial. After the most assiduous and minute inquiries, after hearing one hundred and twelve persons of unexceptionable character, dukes, counts, magistrates, etc., who formerly had been witnesses of the superhuman virtues and exploits of Joan d'Arc; they pronounced the first sentence passed against her unjust, wicked and slanderous; and she was solemnly declared inno- cent of all the crimes with which she had been charged by her enemies.* The English had cherished a hope that the death of Joan would * Several ^v^ite^s, and Dr. Lingard himself, who upon this matter seems not to have been sufficiently acquainted with the best sources of informa- tion, have endeavored to explain the marvellous actions of the Maid of Orleans by mere natural causes ; ascribing them to enthusiastic excitement, to a deluded imagination, which the French court was careful to put to profit. If, however, we attentively consider that Joan d'Arc, a timid girl, not more than seventeen years of age, and hitherto employed, not in a city, but in the peaceful and modest occupations of a country life, from the moment she appeared in court and at the head of armies, evinced in every thing a surprisnig wisdom and energy of soul ; that she became, on a sudden, an intrepid warrior and an accomplished commander, whilst she always remained a perfect model of innocence, piety and all Christian virtues; that her claim to a supernatural mission was, after the severest trials, admitted by persons of every description, by her countrymen and by foreigners, by friends and foes, and even by the greatest enemies of France, whose desire it was to have her conduct attributed to an evil principle ; that all she said was found true; that all she foretold exactly happened in the time, place and other circumstances predicted ; if we attentively consider all this, we will surely find it difficult, nay, absolutely impossible, not to acknowledge in the authentic story of Joan d'Arc something above the ordinary laws of nature ; not to believe that she really was under the special guidance of heaven, and admit in her public career a display of the powsr and wis- dom of God, who chooses the weak tilings of the world that he may confouna the strong (1 Cor. i, 27), and who, after having humbled France, wished to raise it again by the hands of a woman, as he formerly saved his chosen people through the instrumentality of Deborah, Judith and Esther. 28* 830 MODERN" HISTORY. [PART 6. incline the balance in their favor; in this the> were disappointed. Such was the impulse just given by this heroism to the course of events, that England could no longer arrest the progress of France. Charles took Paris with most of the other places conquered by Henry V, and the British retained ttie rest, only in virtue of a truce which the two nations concluded in 1444. Thus did Henry VI lose one of the two crowns that he had inherited from his father; whilst the other likewise began to sit lightly on his head, owing to the rise of strong and hostile parties in his own kingdom. During this season of calamity for Great Britain, the state of the French monarchy was considerably improved by the wise adminis- tration of Charles VII. The better to repair past evils and prevent their recurrence, he established several bodies of regular and standing- troops, from whose cooperation both he and his successors derived the greatest advantages in upholding the dignity of their crown, re- pelling foreign invaders, and restoring tranquillity in the provinces. Stability and peace every where took the place of disturbances and commotions. The former strength of the nation v/as restored; and every thing now conduced to the final overthrow of the English on the continent. In the year 1449, Francis Surienne, a British commander, having been guilty of an infraction of the existing truce, by capturing and plundering the town of Fougeres, the French king availed himself of the opportunity to renew the war with immense advantage. England was involved in domestic dissensions; and her power abroad had been much weakened by the recent loss of two battles against the Scots. In one year, Charles recovered Normandy with its hun- dred fortresses. A like success attended his arms in the invasion of Guienne; the decisive victories of Fourmigni and Chatillon, the former in the north, the latter in the south of France, secured his conquests ; and the English were driven from every inch of grouna they had possessevd in that kingdom, with the exception of the city of Calais (a. d. 1453). About this time, Poland, until then comparatively little known, rose in point of civilization, glory and power, to a conspicuous rank among the European states. For this elevation, she was indebted to the government of the Jagellos, who occupied the Pohsh throne nearly two hundred years, from 1386 to 1572. Germany also flourished at this period under the emperor Sigismond, who reigned from 1410 to 1437. Though unsuccessful in war, that prince governed with honor and ability in time of peace, and was enabled to transmit his ihree crowns of Germany, Bohemia and Hungary to Albert of Aus- tria, his son-in-law; thus laying the foundation of that great power and influence which the house of Austria so long enjoyed in Europe. A. D. 1453.] FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE. 331 FALL OF CONSTANTIJNOPLE.— A. D. 1453. The Greek empire, in the mean time, was drawing near to its ex- tinction. The defeat ol" Bajazet Ilderim by Tamerlane had, it is true, dehvered Constantinople from that terrible sultan of the Turks, but not from the Turks themselves, who, in a short time, reappeared on the field of battle, as undaunted and powerful as ever. After the pacific reign of Mahomet I, who died in 1421, Amurat II, his son and successor, renewed hostilities against the Greeks, the Hunga- rians, and other Christian nations in the vicinity of his frontiers. Notwitiistanding the losses and defeats which he occasionally sus- tained, he continued to gain ground, and at last gave the deadly blow to the league of his opponents in the famous battle of Varna, in 1444. This battle was more fatal to the cause of Christendom than that of Nicopolis had been, in as much as it opened a wide field to the en- terprising spirit of the Turks, and deprived Constantinople of its last resources. In fine, Mahomet II appeared, the most terrible of all the Turkish sultans. No sooner had he grasped the sceptre left by his father Amurat, than he resolved to snatch the Greek capital from the hands of the reigning emperor, Constantine Paleologus or Dragazes, a prince worthy of better times, but whose heroic exertions could postpone only for a short period the faU of Constantinople. This was the last struggle between a power recently founded, but already the most for- midable in the world, and an ancient monarchy, the glory of which had filled the whole earth, but which now presented nothing but de- generacy and discord. There was not less difference in the character of the two monarcha than in the respective strength and fate of their empires. All ad- mired the virtue and moderation of Paleologus, his prudence in council, his intrepidity on the field of battle, and his unshaken firm- ness in adversity. Mahomet displayed on every occasion a bold and haughty spirit, and a boundless ambition. He was, we are told, a lover of the arts and sciences, and could speak several languages; hut those pacific studies had not curbed his ferocious temper; in war, he spared neither his enemies nor his own soldiers, and frequently peace itself was rendered bloody by the violence of his passions. — The last successor of Constantine-the-Great possessed all the virtues of a Christian and magnanimous prince ; the son of Amurat was characterized by all the vices of Mussulman and lawless conqueror. As the siege of Contantinople was to be commenced in the spring of 1453, the preceding winter was actively spent by both jtarties iu 832 MODEEN HISTORY. [PART 6. making the necessary preparations. Towards the first days of April, the imperial city was surrounded by a fleet of three hundred and twenty vessels, and by a land army of three hundred thousand men, one-third of whom were cavalry. To these formidable forces Oon- stantine Paleologus could oppose only a few ships and galleys, and eight or nine thousand warriors, partly Greeks and partly Italians , with whom he had to defend a territory of about twelve miles in cir- cumference. He appointed for their commander-in-chief, Justiniani, a Genoese officer of great experience, distributed them as well as he possibly could throughout the different posts of the rampart, and re- served for himself one of the points most exposed to the assaults of the enemy. The Turks employed in that siege all the resources of the destruc- tive art of warfare, such as mines dug beneath the walls- of the city, rolling towers, battering rams, and a multitude of machines destined to cast stones, darts and arrows. Above all, the use of artillery hav- ing now become general, Mahomet did not fail to supply his troops with this powerful means of attack, and prepared fourteen batteries of enormous cannon, and balls of proportionate size. Some of those pieces of ordnance could send balls of two hundred pounds weight j and one of them in particular, called Basilica, sent a ball weighing upwards of six quintals, to the distance of more than a mile. It re- puired two thousand men and about one hundred and fifty oxen, to remove it from the spot where it was made, to its intended battery. Its interior circumference was nine feet, and its weight thirty or forty thousand pounds. But experience proved that the use of such enor- mous guns produced greater encumbrance and disadvantage than real utility; this was the case particularly with the famous Basilica, which soon burst with a frightful explosion, and killed, among other persons, its very maker, who was a Hungarian apostate. The Greeks too were abundantly provided with military engines, cannon and Grecian fire, which they used with dreadful effect against the Turks, day and night repelling their assaults, ruining their works, and consigning their machines to the flames. These heroic exertions were owing chiefly to the emperor and his general Justiniani, whose indefatigable activity seemed to multiply their persons and make thera present in every place where succor was required. It seemed as if they had communicated their energy and courage to all the soldiers of the garrison. When Mahomet perceived that the exterior fortifications of the town had been almost entirely destroyed by the continual firing of his artillery, he commanded his troops to prepare for an assault His hope of success rested principally on a wooden tower many stories high and full of combatants, which he caused, with all pos3i_ A. D. 1453.] FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE. 833 ble precaution, to advance towards the wall. Here a fierce conflict took place, which was continued two days with incredible animosity and prodigious efforts on both sides. At length, victory declared in favcr of the Greeks; the Turks were repelled, and had the mortifica- tion to see their wooden tower overthrown and soon reduced to ashea, This unexpected result highly exasperated Mahomet, who could not forbear saying that, had thirty thousand prophets foretold so extraor- dinary a disaster, he would not have believed the prediction. A few Aveeks after this event, a similar disgrace which befell his fleet and which he himself witnessed, threw him into a paroxysm of rage. Four Christian vessels appeared in sight of Constantinople, and, disregarding the great number of the Ottoman ships, fearlessly advanced towards the harbor. The enemy went to obstruct their pas- sage, with full confidence of an easy victory ; but the four frigates opened upon them so terrible and so well-timed a fire, that many of the Turkish vessels were sunk, and others greatly damaged. Mahomet who had observed the combat from a neighboring hill, descended, foaming with rage, and spurring his horse into the sea, even at the risk of his life, loaded the commanders of his galleys with the most bitter reproaches, and was carried so far by his passion as brutally to strike the admiral with a golden rod which he held in his hand. But all his fury and threats were idle; the four ships steadily pur- sued their course; and, <;ontinuing to disperse his navy, opened foi themselves a free passage to the harbor, where they entered in tri- umph amidst the acclamations of the Greeks, who, from the top of their ramparts, had also been spectators of the combat. It is supposed that the Turks had sent about two hundred vessels against this intrepid flotilla, and, without killing one single Christian, lost no fewer than twelve thousand men.* The besieged had a very great advantage, as long as they kept possession of their excellent harbor; nor could the Ottoman fleet force its entrance, which was obstructed by a line of strong galleys and an enormous chain of iron reaching from shore to shore. To deprive them of this resource, Mahomet conceived the bold design * This event and other similar incidents plainly show the great superiori- ty of the Christians over the Ottomans, in discipline, military science and valor. If the latter were at length successful in overthrovvinn; the Greek empire, this was evidently owing to their vast multitude, and 'to the con- tinual arrival of reenforcements, rather than to real and well directed dravery. How great the ditference between the warriors of the fifth cru- sade aiid those ot Mahomet II ! Here we see three hundred thousand Turks, supplied with a ibnnidable artillery, scarcely able, after a siege of eight toecks, to take Constantinople, whose garrison did not amount to more than eight or nine thousand soldiers; whereas twenty thousand crusaders, in three daj/s, carried it by storm, in spite of the eifor's of more tlian two kuAidred thousand men, by who n it was defended ! 834 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 6. of transporting by land seventy or eighty of his vessels from the sea into the port. This fact, though it may seem incredible, is related in substance by all the contemporary historians. With regard to its circumstances, it appears that, by dint of men and machines, the vessels were caused to roll through a space of three or four miles over planks thickly covered with grease. As all was done during the night with great celerity, the garrison and inhabitants of Constan- tinople did not suspect the fatal scheme, until it was too late to prevent Its execution. They were surprised and alarmed at seeing the enemy now near their ramparts and their homes, and they attempted, but in vain, to destroy the Turkish vessels, by means of the Grecian fire, which had so often before saved Constantmople. Forty of their most intrepid warriors, who had taken upon themselves this hazard ous enterprise, were basely betrayed, fell into the hands of the Turks, and paid with their lives for their generous devotedness. The garrison, however, continued to defend itself with admirable vigor, after the example of the emperor, whose exertions seemed to be the effect of almost superhuman energy. This excellent prince was acting, at the same time, the part of a father, a sovereign, a soldier, and a general ; scarcely allowing himself any repose, but continually occupied in encouraging by word and example a pusil- lanimous and ill-disposed people, or sharing with his brave garrison in the fatigues of the siege and the dangers of unceasing combats. During the day, he was foremost in fighting and repelhng the enemy; during the night, his chief occupation was to reconcile, to soothe and to relieve by every means in his power, his discontented, distressed, and ungrateful subjects. Thus, without ever deviating from the line of social and Christian virtue, Paleologus displayed a valor and mag nanimity which made him not only equal, but even superior to the perils which surrounded him; and, whilst he stood almost alone upon the ruins of his falling empire, he still seemed to bid defiance to his implacable foe. As the virtuous emperor could not banish from his mind the sad apprehension that the day of wo was approaching, he resolved to make an additional sacrifice of his personal leelings for the preserva- tion of his people. He offered the sultan the payment of any tribute that might be exacted, provided the possession of the imperial city should be secured to the Greeks; but as Manomet absolutely required the surrender of Constantinople in exchange for some principahty, Constantine nobly rejected the degrading proposal, and preferred a glorious death. Mahomet himself was not free from uneasiness with regard to the final result of the war; and he had reason to fear that it might even- tually turn against himself, as his troops, dispirited by their losses A. D. 1453.] FALL OF CONSTATINOPLE. 335 and by the obstinate resistance of the Greeks, loudly called for the cessation of so bloody and perilous a siege. But the undaunted sul- tan revived their spirits by promising them all the treasures of Con- stantinople, should a new attack upon that city prove successful. The assault was to take place on the twenty-ninth of May. At dusk, on the eve of the day appointed, the soldiers were commanded to assemble, each with a lighted torch at the extremity of his lance o\ cimeter ; Mahomet appeared in the midst of them, renewed his pro- mise, and, to render it more sacred, swore by the eternity of God, by four thousand prophets, by the soul of his father Amurat, his own chil- dren, and his sivord; upon which all exclaimed: "God is God, and Mahomet is his prophet." When this warlike ceremony was over, the sulian ordered a profound silence to be observed throughout the camp; and nothing then was heard round Constantinople but the low murmurs of an army silently preparing for a terrible and decisive assauh. In the imperial city, the garrison was attentively watching from the ramparts all the movements of the Turks. Their repeated shouts had been heard with anxiety and alarm; the terror was increased by the sudden silence which ensued, and the light of innume rable torches in the camp being reflected by the tops of the towers and by the steeples of churches in the town, rendered still more gloomy, from the contrast, the darkness which covered the other parts of Constantinople. Paleologus assembled his chief warriops, and addressed them in a moving speech, exhorting them to encoun- ter fearlessly the approaching peril. He recommended presence of mind to the officers, obedience to the soldiers, intrepidity to all, and spoke so feelingly as to draw tears from every one of his hearers : they embraced each other as if for the last time'; and, after they had separated, the emperor went to pray and receive communion in the church of St. Sophia. He afterwards visited the imperial palace, gave his orders, and asked pardon of all persons there present for the faults which he might have commuted in the government of his people; every one answered only by his sighs and tears. He then went out overwhelmed with affliction, but still generous and intrepid, and mounting on horseback, visited all the ramparts, examined the different posts of the garrison, and finally resumed his own station, the most perilous of all. The last day of the Greek empire had now arrived. At one o^!lock in the morning, the clarions resounded in the Turkish camp; Mahomet gave the signal for the assault, and no fewer than two hi;ndred and sixty thousand soldiers began to storm the city of Con- stantino: at day-break, all the troops on each side were engaged m the conflict. The Turks, animated by their usual wild fanaticism, 836 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 6. by the exhortations of Mahomet, by the hope of victory and the expectation of pillage, forced their way, with a sort of phrensy, through guns and pikes ; nor were they deterred either by the difficult access of the breach, or by the sight of their companions falling dead around them whilst endeavoring to scale the wall with ladders Reckless of life, they sought only to reach their opponents, and to strike them down with their murderous weapons, whilst destructive missiles were incessantly thrown from their engines. But, tf the shock was furious, the resistance at all points was not less vigorous and obstinate ; if the assailants dealt destruction among the besieged, their own numbers were thinned by death in its most terrible forms. Besides repeated and successful discharges of musketry, the soldiers of the garrison poured upon the thick battalions of the Turks streams of boiling oil, melted wax, and Grecian fire, and from the top of the wall threw rocks and mill-stones, which crushed all that came in their way. A considerable portion of the battlements and several towers having been demolished by the battering rams and artillery, the noble defenders of Constantinople presented themselves as a new rampart, much more difficult to be overthrown than that built of inanimate materials. The emperor fought at their head, and set every one an example of the most intrepid courage : numbers of barbarians were mowed down by the edge of his sword j the very sight of the imperial banner struck terror into the enemy. • After a tremendous contest of two hours, Mahomet advanced with the choicest of his troops and a body of ten thousand Janizaries. He appeared in the midst of them with a club in his hand, animating his troops by his fierce countenance, and pointing out to them the parts of the wall which they were to attack. Behind this band stood other bodies of troops destined to support the assailants, to stop those who might be tempted to fly, and force them to return to the charge. The sound of the clarions, the clashing of the swords and cimeters, the discharges o«f the artillery, the crash of the falling ramparts, all contributed to render the assault a scene of horror more easily ima- gined than described. In this awful tumult, the Janizaries them- selves began to fight with some confusion ; and Paleologus, who had perceived the circumstance, was exhorting his brave attendants to make a last and decisive effort, when a fatal accident suddenly changed the aspect of the battle. General Justiniani having received a wound, retired, in order to have it dressed. The Genoese and other auxiliary troops, deprived of the presence of their commander- in-chief, began to waver, and, imitating his example, withdrew from the conflict. In vain did Constantine endeavor to rally them. Find- mg it impossible to save his empire, he determined to fall with it, and to die as became an emperor. Fbr some moments more, he main- A. D. 1453.] FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE. 337 tained the unequal contest, saw his last conjpanions perish by his side, and at length overpowered by numbers, fell among the foremost of the slain. Constantinople was now irretrievably left a prey to wild and bar- barous conquerors. The weak remains of its garrison were dis- persed; Justiniani had retired to a distant spot, where he shortly after expired. Amidst the inconceivable tumult and desolation that reigned every where, the Turks rushed into the city, and, in virtue of the sultan's promise, plundered it during three days. About forty thou- sand of its unfortunate inhabitants were put to the sword, and sixty thousand detained as captives. Among those who had the happiness to escape, many fled to the western parts of Europe, where, having estabhshed their residence, they greatly concurred in reviving the fine arts, polite literature, and a relish for the study of oriental languages. Thus, as the Western empire, which had been founded by Augu&- ttis, expired under Augustulus; so the Eastern empire, which had been founded by a Constanline, fell under another Constantine, eleven hundred and twenty-three years after the building of Constantinople. Gradually stripped of its extensive possessions, it had long continued to subsist, at least within the precincts of its capital, like a majestic pillar which supports the last arch of a decaying edifice. It at length disappeared under the repeated attacks of the barbarians, and its downfall afforded to the world a new evidence of this truth, that nothing is unchangeable which has been established by men, and that th(; works of God alone remain forever. MAHOMET II CONTINUED. As soon as order and tranquillity began to succeed the awful scenes of bloodshed, plunder and destruction, which attended the capture of Constantinople, Mahomet left his camp and took solemn possession of this unhappy city which his efforts had finally subdued. By evincing a certain moderation towards the vanquished, and adopt- ing some other measures of policy, he succeeded in retaining within the town the sad remnants of its inhabitants, and in supplying the absence of those who had perished; and from that time the former capital of the Greek empire became the chief city of the Turkish dominions. The sultan then examined what country he should next add to his vast monarchy, the measure of his ambition being to acknowledge no measure. Unfortunately for the neighboring princes, the long duration of his reign enabled him to attack them all 29 838 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 6. in succession. Either by fraud and stratagem, or by violence and open war, he succeeded so far in his mighty schemes of conquest, aa to destroy another empire (Trebisonde), subdue twelve kingdoms, and capture more than two hundred cities. Mahomet failed however in his attempt to establish a universal empire, which was the great aim of his ambition. At the time when he assumed the most threatening attitude. Divine Providence had already raised up three great men to check his progress, and save Europe from his destructive sway. § I. MAHOMET II AND HUNNIADES.— a. d. 1453—1456. The first of these was John Corvinus Hunniades, prince of Tran- sylvania and governor of Hungary, who had previously distinguished himself bj his many exploits against Amu rat II. Although he lost the battle of Varna in 1444, his name continued to be so formi. dable to the infidels, that the Turkish women made use of it to frigh- ten their little children, and the mere rumor of his approach at the head of an army, almost raised the siege of Constantinople. After the fall of that capital, the hopes of Christian Europe chiefly rested upon him, and his sword was in reality its principal defence against tne attacks of Mahomet. Belgrade, a considerable and well fortified touTi at the confluence of the Danube and of the Save, had been for some time an object ot particular envy for the Ottomans. In June (a. d. 1456), it was invested by an army of one hundred and fifty thousand men, whom the sultan led in person, and by a fleet so numerous that the vesse/s covered the two rivers. The soldiers of the garrison bravely main- tamed their position, and, until the middle of July withstood with indomitable valor all the efl-orts of the assailants; still, the place, thus closely besieged and battered day and night by a formidable artillery, was m immment danger of being reduced by famine or by storm, when the banners of Hunniades, who was hastening to its assistance, were seen waving upon the summits of the surrounding mountains, and his fleet at the same time appeared sailing down the Danube. Thii great man did not hesitate, with raw and half disciplined troopsj to attack the whole Turkish fleet, which obstructed his passage. The Bhock was so furious, the resistance so obstinate, and the slaughter so great, that the waters of the Danube seemed changed into blood. At length, the line of the Turks being broken, several of their gallies were captured; the others withdrew; and the conquerors entered the town, amidst the loud acclamations of the inhaliitants, who hailed A. D. 1453—1456.] MAHOMET AND KUNNIADES. 339 the arrival of Hunniades among ihem as a sure sign of their approaching deliverance. Slill, the danger was not yet past. The sultan, far from being dispirited, with redoubled energy caused the walls of Belgrade to be BO furiously and so incessantly battered, as to render their further reparation impossible. No sooner was the breach sufficiently wide, than the Turks rushed to the assault, and in order to divide the forces of the besieged, applied ladders to many places at once; they how- ever advanced bui little on that day. After having reposed during the night, the attacR was renewed with still greater fury than before. In a few moments, so fierce was the conflict, that the combatants were mixed together sometimes upon the breach, sometimes within the town itself, the Christians and the Turks alternately obtaining the advantage. During this long period of awful suspense, Hunniades proved himself both a general and a soldier; throwing himself into the thickest part of the battle, he slew, or wounded and dispersed all within his reach ; while on the side of the Turks, Mahomet was seen in the midst of the Janizaries, venting his anger, animating his troops, and exposing himself to the greatest dangers. It was thus that boldness and the hope of victory, well regulated valor and desperate courage, exhibited the whole day a frightful scene of carnage, and produced a variety of exploits which it would be impossible to enumerate. It will suffice here to mention one of them, which really deserves particular notice. A Hungarian soldier, of common rank, but of heroic sentiments, saw a Turk ascend to the top of a tower, where he began to plant his banner with the view of driving the Christians to despondency, by making them believe that the city was already taken. Without losing an instant, he hastened after the Turk, and strove to wrest the banner from him; finding himself unable to effect his purpose, he seized the Turk, and, with the strength of despair, dragged him along whh himself from the top of the tower, and by his death averted impending ruin from the Christians. M this moment, Kasan, the bravest of the Turks, was struck de,'id near Mahomet, and the Janizaries began to waver and retire from the bloody conflict. The sultan, by threats and promises, en- deavored but in vain to rally his dispirited soldiers; being himself wounded by an arrow, and having lost the use of his senses, he was carried away from the field of battle, where the slaughter of the Turks continued until the remains of their army escaped by flight. There were found in thetcamp which they hastily abandoned, about two hundred pieces of heavy artillery, forty colors, and an incredible quantity of ammunition, baggage, splendid tents, and other valuable objects. The battle had lasted, it is said, twenty hour-s, and was the 340 MODERN HISTORY. [pART 6. severest check that the Ottomans received during the long reign of Mahomet. When the sultan, after having recovered his senses, was informed of the extent of his disaster, he was w^ith difficulty pre- vented from killing himself in despair. Nor was this a transient or momentary impression; as long as he Hved, he could not think of Belgrade, without fallmg into a paroxysm of madness. Hunniades did not long survive this glorious event; only five weeks later, a violent fever, occasioned by the fatigues of the last campaign and by the infection of the Turkish camp, carried him off on the tenth of September, of the same year 1456. Being attended in his last moments by St. .Tohn Capistran, his faithful admirer and friend, whose eloquent exhortations had greatly contributed to the victory of Belgrade, he died, as he had hved, with the pious and noble sentiments of a Christian hero, after having caused himself to be carried to the church for the purpose of receiving the Holy Viati- cum, '* it being proper," he said, " that the servant should go to his Lord, rather than that the Lord should come to his servant." The death of this great man, the news of which was rapidly spread, again brought over Europe that gloom which his victory had dispelled. Pope Calixtus III, on being apprized of the sad event, shed an abun- dance of tears ; and Mahomet himself is said to have exclaimed in a melancholy tone : *' Never was there a greater general in the world; and now that he is dead, there is none -whose overthrow could be a sufficient compensation for my defeat." This, however, was not strictly exact; and Mahomet deceived himself, if, besides Matthias Corvinus, who, like his fatner, inflicted severe defeats on the Turks, he did not look upon Scanderbeg as an opponent worthy of him, and at least equal to Hunniades. § II. MAHOMET 11 AND SCANDERBEG.— a. d. 1464—1467. Scanderbeg, otherwise called Georges Castriot, was king of Al- bania, a rough and mountainous district situated on the eastern coast of the Adriatic sea. In the beginning of his reign (k. d. 1443], he vigorously shook off the yoke laid by the Ottomans on his father and country, and, whh a handful of warriors, maintained his position against their innumerable armies during the space of twenty-four years. Amurat 11, who attacked him first, soon experienced the effects of his undaunted valor; and having presumed to besiege Croja, tha capital city of Albania, met there, in Scanderbeg who defended it, an invincible opponent, no armor however strong, no warrior hoW A. D. 146-1 — 1467.] MAHOMET AND SCANDERBEG. 341 brave soever, being able to resist this hero. During the whole siege, the Turks were continually harassed by sallies and skirmishes con- ducted with equal vigor and ability. Their loss, both before the walls of Croja and during their retreat, was so great, and their defeat so ifgnal and so ignominious, that the grief of Amurat on this occasion is thought to have accelerated his death. The war continued under Mahomet II, who contented himself in the beginning with sending many of his generals against the Alba- nians : but Scanderbeg knew so well how to avail himself of his perfect knowledge of the country, of its mountains and defiles, that he repeatedly routed the Turks, notwithstanding their superior forces. On several of these occasions, they lost from twenty to thirty thou- sand men. At length (towards the year 14G4), the sultan determined to go and avenge in person so many defeats : having raised one of those formidable armies with which he had so often visited the neigh- boring states, he invaded the Albanian territory at the head of two hundred thousand men. Scanderbeg had not more than a handful of soldiers with him; still, the Turks were again repeatedly defeated, Croja was once more saved from their yoke, and Mahomet was com- pelled to retire with disappointment and shame. The time was now come for Scanderbeg to exchange earthly lau- rels for a heavenly crown, the reward of his piety and of the valor which he displayed in the defence of rehgion. He was taken dan- gerously ill in the city of Lissa; and, aware that his last hour was approaching, he prepared for it, with his usual magnanimity and fortitude, in the most edifying manner. The last spark of life was about to be extinguished, when information was brought that fifteen thousand Turks had re-entered his territory, and were at a short dis- tance; at this news, he seemed to recover his former strength and warlike ardor, looked for his sword, and giving his orders to the little army which always accompanied him, waited for the result of the battle, until, hearing the glad sounds of victory, he fell back upon his bed and calmly expired, at the age of sixty-three, on the seventeenth of January, 1467. His death proved an irreparable misfortune for his faithful subjects, who, deprived of their invincible leader, could no longer resist the overwhelming forces of the Ottomans. Hence nothing could be more just and proper than the deep and general affliction caused by the loss of this hero; even his charger is said to have shed tears over him, and, by refusing to take his food, to have died of grief three days after his noble and justly lamented master. The Turks themselves, to whom he had been so formidable an enemy during life, were not the least zealous in honormg his memory. They not only touched his coffin with a kind of religious veneration, but having obtained some parcels of his bones, had them 29* 842 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 6- enshrined m silver or gold, to be carried in battles, as a sure pledge, _ they imagined, of safety and victory. There indeed appeared in Scanderbeg something almost above hu- man nature; and it is certain that very few generals have been equal to him in firmness of mind, strength of body, heroic valor and bril- liant success. He gained twenty-two victories over the Ottomans, whilst they were in the height of their power and under the most terrible of their sultans ; and having with his own sword, slain about two thousand of them in different engagements, he was but once slightly wounded. Mahomet, imagining that there was perhaps some- thing marvellous in his cimeter, desired to see it; but not having found the famous weapon what he thought it to be, he returned it with a sort of contempt. "I sent my cimeter to the sultan," said the Al- banian prince, " but not the hand which knows how to vv^ield it in battle." Nearly the whole life of Scanderbeg was a series of wonderful ac- tions, the offspring of the noblest feelings. He not only displayed the intrepidity of a warrior, and the talents of a consummate general, but also practised the social and Christian virtues in a high degree of perfection. Most historians represent him as the mildest of men; and yet, such was the struggle within him, whenever he met with great opposition, that his lower lip would split and bleed ; whence we may conclude that, as he was naturally much inclined to anger, his great mildness must have been the effect of a sublime virtue, and of an extraordinary violence which he offered to himself. This self control, united with the highest degree of military heroism, ought to excite universal admiration for Scanderbeg, and moreover convince every one that the spirit of the true religion, instead of debasing the soul and weakening its energy, as some impious men falsely assert, is, on the contrary, the source of the purest sentiments and noblest actions of which man is capable. Besides the striking examples of Scanderbeg and Hunniades, another evidence of this truth will be seen in the illustrious Peter d'Aubusson, who was also raised up by the Almighty as a rampart to his people, against the invading power of Mahomet. § III. MAHOMET AND PETER D'AUBUSSON.— a. d. 1476-148J The sultan was incensed against the Knights Hospitallers of Si John of Jerusalem, lor the severe losses which they daily inflictea on his commerce, his navy, and his maritime provinces. The storm was now preparing to burst upon them; and the Grand-Master, Peter A.D. 1476 — 1481.] MAHOMET AND P. d'aubusson. 843 J'Aubusson, had scarcely completed his preparations to oppose a vigorous resistance, when, in the spring of the year 1480, the island of Rhodes, the principal residence of the order, was attacked by a fleet of one hundred and sixty vessels, and one hundred thousand men destined to fight on land. That powerful armament at once di- rected all its efforts against the capital city of the island, whose walls were, during three months, battered by pieces of ordnance similar to those which had destroyed the ramparts of Constantinople. But alJ Jhis proved no match for Peter d'Aubusson and his intrepid knights; besiand shordy after another extensive and beautiful island called JJay^i, an Indian name it has resumed in these latter times, after having been successively called Hispaniola and San- Domingo. Every where, a fertile soil exhibited to the sight of the Spaniards produc- tions and animals unknown in Europe. In some places, gold was so abundant, that valuable pieces of it were easily obtained for little mirrors, small bells, and other trifles given in exchange, the simple and artless natives setting little value on that metal so much prized by other nations. Struck with astonishment at the dress, color and arms of the Spaniards, they took these new guests for so many super- natural beings descended from the sky, and accordingly received them with all imaginable kindness and respect. As Columbus always supposed that their country was the extremity of Eastern India, he gave them the name oi Indians; an appellation Avhich, notwithstand- mg the subsequent acknowledgment of the mistake, the aborigines of the new world have hitherto retained. Columbus now thought of returning to Spain, that he might be the first to impart to the sovereigns the news of his success and discove- ries. One of his vessels having run aground, he used the remains of the wreck, with the consent of the Indians, to build a fort upon the shores of Hayti, and leaving in it forty of iiis companions, sailed for Europe in January, 1493. In the middle of the ocean the two re- maining vessels were assailed by so furious a tempest, that Colum- bus, abandoning all hope, wrote a hasty account of his voyage, and, having surrounded the paper with a waxed cloth, put the whole in a cask, which he threw into the sea, hoping that the waves might drive it to the land. Happily, this precaution proved unnecessary; A. D. 1492 — lc06.] DISCOVERY OF AMERICA, ETC. 357 the storm abated, and, on the fifteenth of March, Columbus tr umpn« antly entered the harbor of Palos, from which he had sailed about seven months before. The fortunate admiral proceeded by land to the Spanish court, then at Barcelona j and, as a specimen of his important discoveries, oflered to Isabella and Ferdinand a variety of golden ornaments and produc- tions of the new world. The sovereigns, in return, gave him every i»ark of regard and esteem, and confirmed his title of admiral and viceroy. After their example, the courtiers and lords seemed to vie with each other in bestowing upon him proofs of personal considera- tion. As, however, there are never wanting mean characters, jea- lous of the reputation of others, some persons of this description once publicly told him that, after all, he had not much reason to glory in the discovery of America, some little share of courage and a fortunate chance having been suflScient to bring the attempt to a successful issue. Columbus made no direct reply, but, taking an egg, invited the company to make it stand upon one end. As no one could do this, he struck the egg upon the table, so as to break the end, and left it standing on the broken part, showing, in this simple and plea- sant manner, that the most perplexing things may become the easiesv to be done when we are once shown the way, but not before; and that such was exactly the case with regard to the attempt of going in search of unknown lands. The tidings of the great discovery made by Columbus rapidly spread throughout Europe, filling every one with astonishment, and diffu- sing among nations a lively spirit for maritime enterprise. The Span- ish sovereigns lost no time in taking means to secure their new ac- quisitions. A bull was obtained from Pope Alexander VI, granting them the investiture of all the land that had been or might be dis- covered in Western India, under the condition of planting and pro- pagating the Catholic faith among the inhabitants. But, lest the dis- coveries of the Spaniards should interfere with those of the Portu- guese, which had likewise been secured by a papal bull, an ideal line was drawn, by order of the pope, from the northern to the southern pole, a hundred degrees west of the Azores. All land discovered to the west of this line was conceded to the crown of Spain ; all dis- covered in the opposite direction was to belong to Portugal.* In the mean time, great exertions were made in the Spanish ports to fit out a second expedition upon a larger scale. It consisted of seventeen ships, and about fifteen hundred persons, among whom there were laborers and artisans of all kinds intended for the projected colony, and twelve clergymen destined to impart religious instruction * See note L. 858 MODEKN" HISTORY. - [PART 7. to the natives. With these, Columbus sailed from Cadiz on the twenty-fifth of September, 1493, and had a favorable passage to Hayti ; but his disappointment was very great to find there neither the fort which he had built, nor the forty men whom he had left for its defence. During his absence, their tyrannical and oppressive conduct provoked the hostility of the Indian population, who slew them and utterly demolished their fortress. - The return of Columbut>, his authority, his prudence and modera- tion, might have restored tranquillity in the island ; unfortunately the excellent views which he entertained, instead of being seconded by the zeal, were frequently opposed by the avarice, ambition and de- pravity of many of his new companions. In spite of his measures, of the orders of the sovereigns, and of the remonstrances of zealous clergymen, the Indians were cruelly oppressed; and the number of that unfortunate race daily decreased, from war, starvation and ill-treatment. Finding himself involved m difficulties, Columbus returned to Spain in 1495. His arrival at court easily dispelled the clouds which envy and calumny had thrown round his conduct and ad- ministration ; but he now saw how much more he would have after- wards to endure from his enemies. It was only after two years of fresh disappointments and tedious expectation, that he succeeded in obtaining a squadron of six vessels for a new voyage. From various considerations, he was induced to steer more to the south than he had ever done before. This course led him to the mouth of the great river Orinoco, where he for the first time beheld the continent, on the first of August (a. d. 1498); a most interesting discovery, of the im- portance of which Columbus himself was little aware at the time. The continual dangers which he had to encounter in those un- known seas, together with a variety of other incidents, obliged him to hasten his return to Hispaniola, where he hoped to enjoy the rest he so much needed, before pursuing the great work of exploring the continent. But, while the admiral was thus undergoing all kinds of hardships for the service of Spain, the parly of his enemies obtained the ascen dency at court. Their charges against his administration were so continual, so artful and so numerous, that the Spanish sovereigns thought it proper to despatch a commissary to Hispaniola, for ths purpose of investigating the real state of affairs. This commissary was Francisco de Bobadilla, an intelligent, but at the same time a passionate man. After his arrival at San-Domingo, he acted with so great a partiality, that, while he readily listened to the accusations of the rabble against Columbus, he refused to hear his defence, and even went so fur as to send him in chains to Europe (a. d. 1500). A. D. 1492 — 1506.] DISCOVERY OF AMERICA, ETC. 359 In the ' midst of these outrageous injuries heaped upon his cha- racter and person, Columbus displayed surprising magnanimity. When the vessel on which he embarked, put to sea, the captain, who was a man of feeling, wished to take oiF the fetters of the un- fortunate admiral; but he never would consent to it, and protested that he was resolved to wear them until they should be removed by the express command of his sovereigns. It is said that he ever after kept those chains hanging in his room, and gave orders that they should be buried with him, as a memorial of the ingratitude which the world returns for eminent servi?ces. The arrival of Columbus as a prisoner and a criminal, caused throughout Spain a general burst of indignation against his enemies. The king and queen disavowed the proceedings of Bobadilla, as con- trary to his instructions; they consoled the admiral by a most gracious reception, and promised to reinstate him in all his privileges and dig- nities. This., however, owing both to the untimely death of Isabella, and to the procrastinating policy of Ferdinand, never was efifected. After all, temporal and mercenary considerations had but little weight with Columbus; nor could obstacles abate his zeal for useful discove- ries. Having obtained, after some delay, that a few vessels should be again placed at his disposal, he sailed once more from Cadiz, in the spring of 1502, accompanied by his youngest son Fernando, who afterwards wrote his father's hfe. Never had the admiral to suffer so much as in this his fourth and fast voyage; yet never did he evince more wonderful presence of mind and greater resources of genius. This appeared chiefly in the following occurrence. After a long and perilous cruise on the bois- terous gulfs near the isthmus of Panama, the shattered state of his vessels obliged him, on his return, to run them ashore on the coast of Jamaica, and to remain there for several months. At first, the Indians were eager to supply the Spaniards with provisions, which they exchanged for trifling objects; gradually their ardor subsided, and their useful visits became less and less frequent. The scarcity daily increased in the little camp ; and all began to entertain horrible apprehensions of famine, when a most happy idea presented itsell to the mind of Columbus. From his knowledge of astronomy, he ascertained that there would be, in three days, a total echpse of the moon. He therefore sum- moned the principal caciques (Indian chieftains) to a conference, ap- pointing for it the day of the eclipse. When all were assembled, he first repro;iched them, through his interpreter, with their inhuman in sensihiiity, and threatened them with the vengeance of the God of hea- ven, whom the Spaniards adored: as a token of this impending ven- geance, the moon, he said, would refuse its light to them on that 860 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. very night. In fact^ the echpse commenced a few hours after, and struck terror and dismay into the hearts of the Indians. They fell at the feet of Columbus, and entreated him to ask pardon for them of the God of heaven, assuring him that they would thenceforth brmg to the Spaniards whatever should be required. He feigned to yield with reluctance to their request, and, shutting himself up for some moments in his cabin, came out to them again, and said, that, under the strict condition of their future fidehty to their promises, he had obtained their pardon from the Almighty; in sign of which they would presently behold the light of the moon. The admiral, before speaking thus to them, had waited for the op- portune moment when the eclipse was about to terminate. The moon began to appear, and soon recovered ail its brilliancy, to the inconceivable joy of the Indians, who were scarcely able, from ex cess of astonishment, to testify their admiration, reverence and grati tude for Columbus. They hastened to propitiate him with gifts, and, from that time forward, not only supplied the Spaniards with abundance of provisions, but carefully avoided giving them the least displeasure. At last, two vessels arriving from Hispaniola, delivered the admiral with his companions from this perilous kind of exile, and conveyed them to a safer place. As soon as the state of his affairs permitted, he reembarked for Spain, which, after a passage marked by new adventures, he reached on the 7th of November of the year 1504, with a constitution shattered by so long a series of anxieties, hardships and sufferings. About this time, Columbus lost his constant protectress, Glueen Isabella, aiid, with her, every well founded hope of ever being rein- stated in his former dignities. It was in vain that he had mare and more deserved the gratitude of the court by new services and disco- veries; in vain too, that he urged the execution of the royal promise; the politic Ferdinand always deferred, under various pretences: till ♦he admiral, who had led since his return a lingering life, died at Valladolid, at the age of about sixty-five (a. d. 1506). His last suf- ferings were sanctified by his usual resignation, his last moments devoted to all the pious practices of religion, and his last words, those of the Royal Prophet, Into thy hands, O Lord, I commend my spirit. — • Psalm XXX, 6. What has been already said of Columbus, cle-irly shows that he possessed al^ the characteristics of a truly great man — a noble soul, a vast genius for discovery, and a surprising sagacity in finding out expedients and resources in the greatest dangers. His piety was genuine and fervent; his heart, benevolent and generous; and his con- duct, in unison wil-h the feehngs of his heart. Instead of ravaging tile newly found countries, like many of his contemporary discoverers. A. D. 1497 — 1515.] POKTUGUESE SETTLEMENTS. .861 who were intent only on immediate gain, he sought to colonize ana cultivate them, to civilize the natives, and subject every thing to the control of law, order and religion. If the noble attempt failed, the whole history of this great man proves that the failure cannot be laid to his charge. When Columbus, by his death, ceased to excite the jealousy of the Spanish court, great honors were paid to his memory ; yet, he never obtained the recompense which he had best deserved, that of giving his name to the New World. His just claims were defeated, in this particular, by Amerigo Vespucci, a native of Florence, who in 1499 visited the same coast of Paria which Columbus had dio- covered in 1498, and publishing a relation of the important fact, as if he had first of all perceived the continent, caused it to be called America. But even admitting the merits of Vespucci, he cannot claim the honor of the discovery; to him alone it belongs, who was the first to conceive, mature and execute the bold design of crossing an unknown ocean in search of a New World. PORTUGUESE SETTLEMENTS IN ASIA.— a. d. 1497—1515. Numerous expeditions followed the enterprise of Columbus. Most of them started from the harbors of Spain, and were conducted by Spanish adventurers eager to enrich or distinguish themselves by new and important discoveries; but others were also undertaken by foreign nations. About the same time that Columbus and Vespucci descried Ten-a Firina in the south, the celebrated navigator, Sebastian Cabot, sailing in the service of Henry VII, king of England, discovered and explored the coasts of the northern continent of America. Not long after, Canada and the river St. Lawrence were visited by James Car- tier and other French seamen ; but the Portuguese, by following a different direction, did something still more remarkable. In 1497, Vasco de Gama, sent by Don Emmanuel, king of Portugal, suc- ceeded in doubling the cape of Good Hope, and after a voyage of thirteen months arrived at the fertile shores of East India. During the ensuing years, the Portuguese made, throughout that extensive country, acquisitions and settlements nearly equal in value to those of the Spaniards in the New World. The East Indies had always held a conspicuous rank among the slates of the Asiatic continent, and had been looked upon, from the time of the ancient Assyrians, Persians and Greeks, as an important and enviable country. At later periods, India wUnessed frequent ro- ydutions, and was exposed to frightful calamities from the incursions 31 ■ 362 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. of the Saracen, Tartar and Mogul conquerors. Towards the epoch which now occupies our attention, and during the two following centuries, it comprised many independent states, the most powerful of which, and probably the most opulent in the world was the empire of Hindostan, abounding in pearls, gold and silver, and enriched both bv its commerce and the nroductious of the soil. Greater resistance was made by the Indians of Asia than by those of America to their European aggressors. It was only after many toils and hardships, after many struggles, battles and persever- ing efforts under the command of intrepid leaders, Gama, Cabral, Pacheco, and Albuquerque, that the Portuguese were enabled to establish settlements all along the Indian Coast, at Goa, Cochin, Malacca, etc., and in various Islands of the Southern ocean. Nor was their power throughout these countries of long duration most of their Asiatic possessions being soon wrested from them by the Dutch and English, during the course of the seventeenth century. The Portuguese had also extended their commercial relations to the eastern extremities of Asia, as far as China and Japan. These coun- tries although hitherto little known to the nations of Europe, were ancient and flourishing empires. The Chinese, particularly claim a very high antiquity, their nation having been founded about two thousand years before the coming of our Lord, and governed since that remote period by two hundred and forty emperors, of twenty- two different families. Still their history, with respect to the ages preceding the epochof their great legislator Confucius (towards the year 500 b. c), is involved in obscurity. China is the most populous empire in the world, containing nearly three hundred millions of inhabitants, and several cities, if not supe- rior, at least equal in extent to the largest among the European and American cities. The established religion is a mixture of theism and idolatry ; there are also Mahometans and Jews, though in small numbers. In the seventeenth century, Christianity obtained numer- ous proselytes among the Chinese, under their celebrated emperor Kang-hi; but since that time, the Christians have been always harassed and persecuted with more or less rigor. The northern frontier of this extensive region is protected by a wall twenty-four feet high, thirty or forty feet thick, and fifteen hundred miles long, crossing not only valleys and mountains, but even rivers, over which it passes in the form of bridges. Its gates and towers are almost every where of a colossal size, and defended by numerous troops. It was built two thousand years ago, as a defence against the Tartars, whom it did not however prevent from twice invading and subduing China, first under Genghis-Kan and his sons, and again in the seventeenth century. A.. D. 1497 — 1515.] POKTUGUESE SETTLEMENTS. 863 The Chinese are generally witty and polite, intelligent and indus- trious, but only to a certain degree; and they are vain-glorious, self- conceited, and excessively prepossessed in favor of their nation. Although great lovers of architecture, mechanics, painting, astro- nomy, natural philosophy, etc., they advance but little in these various departments of the arts and sciences. They could not conceal their surprise and jealousy, when the Jesuit missionaries appeared two hundred years ago in China, at seeing those foreigners much more versed than themselves in all the branches of mathematics and natural history. Even the knowledge and use of the mariner's compass, of printing, of gun-powder and artillery, which they seem to have pos- sessed before our European ancestors, have always been among them in a state of comparative imperfection. Their armies, how numerous soever, scarcely deserve the name of a military force, and their vessels that of a navy; whilst, in point of morality, their inhuman treatment of infants, their want of uprightness towards foreigners, their pride, and other vices, place them far below most other nations. Japan is likewise a civihzed and mighty empire, consisting of many islands, not far from the eastern part of Asia. The revenue and forces of the empire are immense, the former being, it is said, nearly two hundred milhons of dollars, the latter amounting, if re- quired, to four hundred thousand infantry and sixty thousand cavalry. The government is absolute and despotic; very little otherwise is known of this nation, owing to the jealousy with which foreigners are excluded. ' Towards the middle of the sixteenth century, St. Francis Xavier and other zealous missionaries preached the gospel in Japan with such wonderful success, that, half a century later (in 1605), it contained no less than eighteen hundred thousand Christians. Unfortunately, at that time, powerful and profligate princes undertook to destroy this illustrious portion of the Church, and succeeded in the impious at- tempt. A dreadful persecution arose, which shed torrents of Chris- tian blood in various provinces of the empire ; nor did it cease until there remained no more victims to be immolated by the sword of the persecutors. From that epoch, up to the year 1852, Japan remained closed against foreigners, and the Dutch were the only Europeans admitted into one of its harbors for the purposes of trade. S64: MODEKN HISTOEY. [PART 7. DECLINE OF THE ITALIAN REPUBLICS,— WARS FOR THE POSSESSION OF ITALY. — CARDINAL XIMENES. — POPE LEO X.--A. D. 1494—1517. The discovery of America and of the passage of the cape of Good Hope, whilst it proved of the greatest advantage to Spain and Por- tugal, naturally occasioned the decline of the Italian republics. Up to this period, foreign commerce had been mostly in the hands of the Venetians, Genoese, and other maritime nations of Italy, who, from the shores of the Adriatic and Mediterranean seas, communicated with the Red sea through the Isthmus of Suez, and thus could carry on trade with all the nations of the East. The two great events just mentioned gave a new direction to the ideas, projects and commerce of the European nations ; and Venice, with the other commercial states of the peninsula, saw her traffic decline in proportion as Portu- gal and Spain increased in wealth and power. Another and a still heavier calamity that afflicted Italy at this period, was the almost uninterrupted series of bloody wars in which it was involved during a great number of years. The first occasion of these calamities was the envied possession of the kingdom of Naples. Since 1443, it had been under the princes of the house of Arragon ; but the French monarchs looked with a jealous eye at that beautiful country, which had once belonged to princes of their family. King Charles VIII, the successor of Louis XI whose whole reign had been spent in endeavoring to weaken the power of the great vassals of the crown, undertook to reconquer Naples in 1494. He executed his design in the beginning of the following year, but soon lost all his conquests. The Italian princes had now united against him, and, although he gloriously repelled them in the battle of For- novo, the only advantage he derived from this victory was to save the remains of his army, and return without further obstacle to France. A second expedition for the same purpose took place in 1501, under Louis XII, successor of Charles VIII. It was attended with Eimilar circumstances and exactly the same result as the first; great success in the beginning, followed by great disasters in the end; at first, repeated advantages obtained over the Neapolitan army by the French troops, and afterwards their own signal defeats at Cerignola, GarigHano, etc., by the Spanish commander, Gonzales of Cordova, surnamed the great general. A treaty almost entirely to the advan- tage of Spain, was then concluded between the rival powers, and terminated these contests for the kingdom of Naples. A. D. 149-4—1517.] DECLINE, ETC. 865 But there were not wanting other motives or pretences for renew- ing the war. lu 1508, a powerful league was formed at Cambray between the emperor of Germany, the kings of France and Arragon, and some other sovereigns, against the republic of Venice, whose pretensions and conquests had provoked their anger, or awakened their jealousy. None of the confederates acted with as much vigor as Louis XII, and none derived less advantage from the defeat of the Venetians. His very exploits and his brilhant victory at Agnadel (a. d. 1509), having soon rendered him an object of alarm to the other princes, the league turned against him; and the French, not- withstanding their new and bloody victory at Ravenna, where they lost their young heroic leader, the duke of Nemours (a. d. 1512), were agam expelled from Italy. France itself was invaded, on one side by the Swiss, who, having conquered the duke of La Tremoille, at Novara, advanced into Bur- gundy as far as Dijon; on the other, by the emperor Maximilian and Henry VIII, king of England, whose combined armies gained the battle of Guingamp, also called the hattU of Spin's, because in it the French cavalry used their spurs more than their weapons. In fine, the king of Scotland, James IV, an ally of France, was also defeated by the English at FJodden-field, where he lost his life in the conflict (a. d. 1513). The conquerors however made but little progress, and Louis happily succeeded in making them consent to a truce, which afforded him some respite. He died at this juncture, without male issue, and was succeeded on the throne by his cousin, the earl of Angouleme, who took the name of Francis I. This new monarch, being in the flower of his age, resolved to conduct the war with fresh vigor. He therefore crossed the Alps at the head of a gallant army, and pressed forward till he was attacked by the Swiss near Marignan, on the 13th of September, 1515. These brave highlanders had neither cavalry nor artillery, and yet fought with the most undaunted courage. Notwithstanding the dreadful havoc which the cannon made among them, they repeatedly renewed the charge, and several times were on the point of breaking through the French hne. It was only after a furious engagement of two days, and the slaughter of several thousands of them, that the survivors retired from the field. A French general, the marshal of Trivulce, who had been present at seventeen other battles, said that none of them, for the obstinate valor displayed on both sides, could be com- pared with that of Marignan. He consequently called it the battls of giants, under which name it is also known in history Francis I evinced on that trying occasion a rare intrepidity. He met in person the most vigorous charges made by the Swiss, without ever losing, in so long a conflict, his presence of mind, and his confi- 31* S66 MODEEN HISTORY. [PAET 7. dence of success. At last, the timely arrival of the Venetians, his allies, under the command of their celebrated general Alviano, entirely tamed the day in his favor. Great were the fruits of this splendid victory for France. Some of her opponents presently desisted from furthei hostilities ; and the Swiss in particular acceded to a treaty of reconciliation with such willingness and sincerity, as to become, from that time, her most faithful ally. King Ferdinand still endeavored, it is true, to protract the war; but, exhausted by mental fatigues and bodily infirmities, he died in the following year (1516), after an almost uninterrupted ca- reer of glory, tarnished, however, on some occasions, by a want of gratitude towards useful men, and of fidelity to his promises. In royal qualities and political achievements he had certainly no equal among the sovereigns of his age, if we except his heroic and vir- tuous consort Isabella, who moreover surpassed him in pure, noble and delicate feelings. The chief personages who contributed most efficaciously with Ferdinand and Isabella to the glory of their reign, were beyond doubt Christopher Columbus, Gonzales of Cordova, both already noticed in the foregoing pages, and Cardinal Ximenes, archbishop of Toledo, the ablest politician, the most zealous minister of state, the most penetrating genius, in a woid, all things taken into consideration, the greatest man that ever Spain produced. Immense and innumerable were the services which he rendered to the Church, to the state, to his sovereigns and to the people, during the twenty-two years of his episcopal and civil administration (1495 — 1517). Magnificent, great, generous, the constant protector of merit, virtue and innocence, he conceived and executed projects the best calculated to advance the cause of religion, humanity and learning. To him the Spanish na- tion was indebted for several of her best and most useful establish- ments, and the literary world for the publication of the first Polyglot Bible,^ which he, with incredible care and expense, caused to be printed at Alcala, in six foho volumes (a. d. 1515). Prom this epoch we may date the complete revival of literature and of the arts and sciences. The French king, Francis I, distmguished himself in this r^pect by his patronage of learning and of learned men. But no one favored their cause and promoted their success, with greater zeal than Pope Leo X, whose name has in consequence been adopted to designate the first part of the sixteenth century con- sidered as a literary age. Endowed with the most exquisite taste, he imparted to all around him that relish for the fine arts, for true clo- * Or, Bible in several languages. — ^There exist three other celebrated Poly- glots: that of Antwerp, a. d. 1572; — of Paris, 1645; — and of London. 1658. A. D. 1517 — 1529.] LUTHER, ETC. 867 quence and poetry, which is the usual forerunner of masterly produc- tions Scholars and artists, roused to uncommon exertions by his signal protection and encouragement, frequently vied with the most elevated geniuses of antiquity, and Italy again beheld, as in the time of the Caesars, a multitude of her children, Raphael, Michael Angelo, Ariosto, Tasso, Yida, Bembo, Sadolet, etc., astonishing the world, Fome by their masterpieces of painting and architecture, others by their beautiful poems and various kinds of writing, which we still admire, both for their delicacy and for their pure and elegant style.* LUTHER AND THE REFORMATION.— a. d. 1517—1529 At the termination of the wars of Italy in 1516, there was a pros pect of a general and lasting peace among Christian nations, when unforeseen events unexpectedly excited anew all the human passions, and carried to a still higher pitch, the disturbances of Europe. The chief and first cause of these fresh commotions, was the religious revolution effected by Luther in Germany. Martin Luther was born in 1483, at Eisleben, a small town of Saxony. After having studied with great success in the Latin schools of Magdeburg and Eisenach, he completed his education in the uni- versity of Erfurt. In the year 1505, he took the degree of Master of Arts, which authorized him to deliver lectures on Physics and the Ethics of Aristotle. But in consequence of an extraordinary eventf which happened to him about this time, and produced a deep impres- sion upon his mind, he formed the design of becoming a religious, and accordingly joined the order of the Augustinians at Erfurt. The life of the young monk (he was then twenty-five years of age) appeared regular, and in many respects edifying. He mani- fested however, in several instances, particularly when he was op- posed or corrected, a warm and irritable disposition. His talents and learning caused his superiors to recommend him to the elector of Saxony, as a professor of divinity in the newly erected university of Wittemberg; and when he afterwards began to preach, the vehemence of his discourses, the boldness of his eloquence, and a nervous kind of expression added to a copious flow of words in his mother-tongue, soon acquired for him the reputation of a good preacher. In the year 1517, Pope Leo X having solemnly published indul- gences to be gained by those who, being truly repentant for their • See note M. t The death of one of his companions, who was killed by a thundeibolt at his side, when they were walking together. 868 MODEEN HISTORY. [PART 7. sins, shouJd contribute by their pious offeringSj to the rebuilding of St. Peter's church in Rome, and ta the expenses of an intended cru- sade against the Turks, the Augustinians could not see without some jealousy, the publication of these indulgences intrusted by the arch- bishop of Mentz, not to them, as had been usual, but to the Domini- can orders and as it was reported, on the other hand, that great abuses existed in the pubhcation and distribution of these indulgences by the Dominicans, Luther was commissioned by his superiors to preach and write against these abuses. This commission he fulfilled with a great deal of warmth 5 but he did not stop there. In the heat of the dispute, he passed insensibly from abuses which the whole Church condemned with him, to the things abused, and soon began to attack the indulgences themselves; and to maintain his first position, he was gradually led to deny also the eflacacy of the sacraments, the invocation of the saints, the sacrifice of the mass, and many other tenets universally admitted in the Church. This bold step produced the greatest excitement all over the Chris- tian world : Luther himself was at first terrified at it. When he began the dispute, it was not his intention to carry it so far, still less to come to an open rupture. He had even expressed his perfect sub- mission to the Roman Pontiff in a letter which he wrote to Leo X, and which he concluded with these remarkable words: "Therefore, most holy father, prostrate at the feet of your Holiness, I place my- self at your disposal, with all that I am and all that I have. Vivify, kill, call, recall, approve, disapprove, as you please; in your voice I will acknowledge the voice of Christ, who presides and speaks in you." But having in the interval gained over a strong party, he no sooner saw his condemnation pronounced! in the papal bull of the fifteenth of June (a. D. 1520), than, yielding to his resentment, he suddenly broke asunder all the ties by which he still adhered to the Roman See, openly separated from it, and the better to seal his separation, he publicly burnt the bull in which his opinions had been condemned, together with the decretals of the popes and the writings of Eckius his principal adversary, in the presence of the professors and the students of the university, and an immense concourse of tha inhabitants of Wittemberg. The die was cast ; Luther continued to vent his anger by calling the pope anti-christ, the man of sin, the minister of Satan, and enemy of all good : he used similar expressions, not only against the king of England, Henry VIII, who had written a book in refutation of his tenets, but also against the various universities and Catholic doctors, by whom his doctrine had been unanimously rejected. The vehe- mence of his discourses, his exhortations to shake ofi* the yoke of sacramental confession, of penitential works, of religious celibacy. A. D. 1519 — 1529.] CHARLES V. FRANCIS I. 369 and his suggestions lo seize upon ecclesiastical property, vastly increased the number of his followers. No later than the year 1523, the doctrines and practices of the reformation were introduced into Denmark, Sweden, and many other countries of the north of Europe; whilst, on the otiier hand, Zuinglius, and, shortly after, Calvin, endeavored to effect similar or even greater changes in Switzerland and France, where they met however with more opposition and less success. In 1529, an imperial decree was issued at Spire for the purpose of checking the progress of religious dissensions, and restoring the unity of faith in Germany ,• but it had very little effect. The partisans of Luther protested against it, whence came their name of Protestants; they moreover appealed to the sword in support of their pretensions, and commenced a civil war which disturbed nearly the whole reign of the emperor Charles V. These measures were adopted by them the more wilUngly, as Luther himself had declared that it was lawful, and even necessary, to take up arms in order to defend and propagate the reformation ! Thus was completed a revolution, which split the great Christian family in Europe into many separate and opposite communities. Its chief promoter lived long enough to see not only the rise of the other branches of the reformation, but also the subdivision of his own estab- lishment into a multitude of parties. He died in 1546. During the same year, his various tenets, together with those of Zuinglius and Calvin, began to be discussed and subjected to the usual form of Ecclesiastical condemnation in the council of Trent, the last of the general councils, first convened in the end of 1545, and, after two interruptions, finally closed in 1563. CHARLES V AND FRANCIS I.— a. d. 1519—1529. Another cause of the disturbances and evils which afflicted Europe at this unfortunate period, was the obstinate jealousy of two rival and powerful sovereigns. The imperial throne of Germany, left vacant by the death of Maximilian I in 1519, had been simulta- neously claimed by Francis I, king of France, and Charles, archduke of Austria, who had lately succeeded his grand-father Ferdinand on the throne of Spain. The former indeed was a brave and generous prince, but the latter possessed more prudence and skill, and, being moreover of German extraction, he was easily preferred to his com- pefitor. He received the imperial crown at Aix-la-Chapelle, on tho twenty-third of October (a. d. 1520). 870 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. Francis could uot, without deep sorrow, see his hopes disaj>- pointed; and, imagining himself injured, availed himself of his other pretensions with regard to the kingdoms of Navarre and Naples, to commence hostihties. During the first campaigns, success was almost equally divided between the two parties, till the high-constable de Bourbon, dissatisfied with the French court, and basely abandon- ing the cause of his sovereign and country, went to offer his services to the emperor. Immediately after, the French lost all their posses- sions in Italy, together with the brightest ornament of their chivalry, the illustrious Bayard, surnamed the knight without fear and without rej)roach. Francis now resolved, in order to repair his losses, to take upon himself the conduct of the war. He crossed the Alps at the head of a fresh army, and marched as far as Pavia which he besieged, the imperial troops under the command of de Bourbon, hastening at the same time to the relief of the garrison. At their approach, Francis was advised by his ablest officers rather to abandon the siege, than expose his wearied soldiers to an attack from superior forces; but his mind, too much attached to the point of honor, could not brook the idea of retreating before the enemy : he therefore determined to abide the issue of a battle. It seemed, in the beginning, that victory would declare for the French. Their well-conducted artillery mowed down whole ranks of their opponents, when, on a sudden, the imprudent valor of the king destroyed his prospect of success. Anxious to fight with the sword, he rushed forward, and most indiscreetly placed himself be- tween the enemy and his own cannon, which, being thus prevented from firing any longer, of course became useless. This conduct was deservedly followed by a complete overthow. The imperialists, hav- ing nothing more to fear from the French artillery, rallied and fell with fury on the squadron commanded by the king. In a few mo- ments, the scale of fortune was inclined ; Francis saw all his atten- dants fall by his side; and after having fought with the most despe^ rate courage, and killed seven of the assailants with his own hand, he was forced to surrender himself a prisoner. Of the French army, one-half had been destroyed, the remainder evacuated Italy (a. d. 1525). The unhappy monarch was, according to his own request, con- veyed to Madrid, the capital of Spain. He was detained there for several months, and could not rescue himself from his tedious cap- tivity otherwise than by promising the full cession of several pro- vinces, which he either actually possessed, or had hitherto claimed. No sooner was he set at liberty, than he bitterly complained of the A. D. 1520 — 1532.] CHARLES V. AND SOLIMAN II. 371 rigor of these conditions, and availed himself of the opposition witli which the treaty met in the council of state, to leave it unexecuted. This conduct could not but highly displease the emperor. The feehngs of both parties were thus more exasperated than ever; the war was renewed, and carried on with redoubled violence, espe- cially by the treacherous constable de Bourbon, who, having no funds to pay his army chiefly composed of Lutheran soldiers from Germany, promised, in order to make Pope Clement VII repent of his kind disposition towards France, to enrich them by the pillage of Rome. Accordingly he led his troops to the attack of this capital; and, although he fell by a musket ball as he was mounting a ladder for the assau4t, the city was taken, and being abandoned for two months to a licentious and infuriated soldiery, suffered more from the German adventurers, than it had formerly done from either the Goths or the Vandals. Still, as neither this nor any other event of the war could be looked upon as a decisive action, both parties became tired of hostilities, and equally desirous of a speedy accommodation ot their differences. This was effected in 1529 by the treaty of Cam- bray, which, although less adverse to the interests of the French monarch than that of Madrid, secured many advantages to the emperor. CHARLES V AND SOLIMAN II.*— a. d. 1520—1532. The chief motive which had urged Charles V to conclude peace with France, was, that he needed all his troops to defend his heredi- tary dominions against the Turks. The invading spirit of those infidels was still as remarkable as under Mahomet II. Not only had they, within the last years, extended their conquests in Europe and Asia, but even Egypt, the richest country of Africa, was entirely subdued by them in 1517, notwithstanding the brave resistance of its possessors, the Mamelukes. Soliman II, who succeeded his father, Selim I, in 1520, carried still further the glory of the Ottoman name. More fortunate than Mahomet himself, he successfully invaded Hungary ; and Belgrade, no longer protected by the sword of Hunniades, fell, after a siege of six weeks, into the hands of the Turks. Many otlier towns were successively carried by storm, or obliged to open their gates. After this expedition, the sultan not thinking it advisable, for the * Called Soliman I by several authors, who do not reckon Soliman, the son of Bajazet I, among the Turkish sultans, owing probably to the short and precarious duration of his reign. 872 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. present, to advance farther in that direction, prepared himself for another conquest which he deemed still more important. In 1522, four hundred vessels and two hundred thousand men appeared in sight of Rhodes, and laid siege to the capital of this island which had now been in the possession of the Knights Hospi- tallers for more than two hundred years. The Grand -Master was* ViUiers de PIsle Adam, a hero not inferior in any respect to Peter d'Aubusson, but less favored by existing circumstances. The nations of Europe being too actively engaged in the struggle between Cnarles V and Francis I, to send him any assistance, all the forces he could oppose to the multitude of the assailants, consisted merely of five thousand soldiers and six hundred knights. Still, witi^ this handful of warriors, he held out, during six months, against all the efforts ot the Janizaries and all the exertions of Soliraan, who had now arrived to conduct the siege in person. Such was the valor of these generous defenders of Rhodes, that, in a general assault, the Turks lost no fewer than twenty thousand, and in other attacks, a proportionate amount of their most intrepid warriors. At the sight of this dreadful slaughter of his troops, the sultan, driven almost to despair, thought of abandoning the siege, when the secret, but fatal advice of an infamous traitor, one of the chief com- manders in the town, encouraged him to stay and redouble his efforts. The treason indeed was detected, and visited almost instant- ly with capital- punishment; but it was too late for the liberation of Rhodes, now in great want of ammunition, and almost reduced to the last extremity. Although the knights continued, with their usual heroism, to repel every assault of the enemy, and seemed determined to bury themselves under the ruins of their capital, the inhabitants were not endowed with the same degree of fortitude. Justly dread- ing the horrors of a city carried by storm, they urged with entreaties, and even with threats, the acceptance of an honorable and advan- tageous capitulation offered by Soliman. It had thus become an indispensable necessity to yield, and all subsequent resistance would have been of no avail; however, the few remaining knights could not leave, without deep regret, the spot which had been the theatre of their exploits. Above all, the depar- ture of the Grand-Master, at his advanced age, for a distant country, was an afflicting scene, which the suhan tftmself could not witness without compassion. Like the Trojans of old, under the conduct of 3Eneas, these noble fugitives, carrying along with them the fortunes and destinies of their Order, wandered for some time over the seas, in search of a hospitable land. After a short stay in Candia, they reached the shores of Italy, where they met with the most consoling and cordial reception, and obtained at length from Charles V the A. D. 1520—1532.] CHARLES V. AND SOLIMAN II. 373 possession of the small island of Malta, in the middle of the Mediter- ranean sea, a situation well adapted to their religious and military pur- poses. They fortitied this new residence, so as to make it, like the former, the bulwark of Christendom and the centre of their exertions .'jgainst the infidels. The heavy losses which Soliman had sustained in Rhodes, taught him not to be hasty in undertaking any new expedition. He there- fore passed the three or four ensuing years in promoting the interior prosperity of his empire, and securing among his subjects an ade- quate distribution of justice; till a revolt of the Janizaries warned him again, very unhappily for Europe, not to let those restless war- riors live any longer in idleness. Having quelled the sedition, he, for the second time, invaded Hungary, at the head of two hundred thousand men. King Louis II, with only twenty-five or thirty thou- sand soldiers, fearlessly met him in the plains of Mohats, but was, after a sharp contest, overwhelmed by numbers, and lost on the same day his army, his crown, and his life (a. d. 1526). The sultan, no longer opposed in his march, now laid waste the surrounding country, took Buda, an important place, and advancing westward towards Vienna, laid siege to that city, the capital of the Austrian dominions. Fortunately, Vienna was better supphed than Rhodes with troops and provisions: tAventy thousand brave soldiers, under the command of the count Palatine and the earl of Salm, composed the garrison, and all of them displayed so undaunted a courage, as finally to com- pel the Turks to retire, after twenty useless assaults, and the loss of eighty thousand warriors (a. d. 1529). Soliman however did not yet give up his hostile designs against Austria. He reappeared in 1532, with an army of three, some say, five hundred thousand men. Charles V marched against him with thirty thousand horse, and ninety thousand well disciplined infantry, besides prodigious swarms of irregulars. At the sight of these powerful monarchs and of their formidable hosts advancing against each other, all Europe stood in awe and in expectation of a tremen- dous conflict; yet, when the armies approached, instead of a decisive ba'tle, there were only a few skirmishes between the advanced par- ties. Soliman did not think proper to risk a defeat ; and, retreating in good ordei.. rather chose to turn his arms against the less warlike nations of Asia. Nor did the emperor undertake to pursue him in this retrograde march, but, being himself satisfied to see the coun- try free from invasion, he disbanded his own forces, and set out from Germany to visit his provinces of Italy, and his kingdom of Spain. 32 374 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. CONQUEST OF MEXICO.— HERNANDO CORTEZ. A. D. 1519—1523. Whilst Charles V caused his power to be obeyed or feared all over Europe, his name was carried to the extremities of the earth by the celebrated Magellan, who was the first to undertake the circum- navigation of the globe; and other intrepid adventurers, about the same time, were subjecting to his sway vast and opulent countries in the Nev/ World. Such was, indeed, especially during this period, the heroic spirit, partly religious and partly chivalrous, diffused among the Spaniards, that nothing seemed impossible to their activi- ty, valor and perseverance. This the reader will easily perceive in the impartial and detailed account of the manner in which a few warriors of that magnanimous nation succeeded in conquering the mighty empires of Mexico and Peru, the former in North, the latter in South America. In one of their excursions upon the American continent, the Span- iards were informed that there existed, at no great distance from the coast, a rich and flourishing empire called Mexico. The governor of Cuba, Velasquez, having conceived the design of estabhshing colonies in that extensive country, fitted out a fleet for that purpose, and placed it under the command of Hernando Cortez, one of his officers, whom he considered as a man equally capable of bringing the most arduous enterprise to a happy issue, and at the same time incapable of ever aspiring to independence. His conjectures as to the abilities of Cortez were perfectly correct; for it would have been impossible to find an individual possessing more sagacity and pru- dence, more energy and boldness : but, as the sequel will show, he had completely mistaken the turn of his mind and his real cha- racter. Cortez sailed from Cuba on the tenth of January (a. d. 1519), with eleven small vessels carrying six hundred men, sixteen horses and six pieces of artillery ; not hesitating with this inconsiderable force to undertake the conquest of an empire which exceeded in extent all the European dominions of Spain.* He had not proceeded far, when * InteUigent readers will easily understand that we here make use of the word conquest, only through an anticipated view of the event. The projects of Cortez, as both his words and conduct invariably testified, were wholly humane and pacific. It is true, he provided himself, and that very pru- dently, with means of self-defence and even of warfare, for the case of Stern necessity: but he always intended to treat the natives with due mode- ration and kindness, and with a sincere desire of their own greater good; nor did he deviate from this rule, until compelled to do so by the iadomita- ble hostility of the Indians. A. D. 1519 — 1523.] CONQUEST OF MEXICO. 375 Velasquez began to entertain suspicions against the new general, and wished to revoke his commission ; but it was too late. Cortez, protected not only by the affection of his soldiers, but also, says Solis by the justice of his cause, continued his voyage, and landmg on the continent, caused himself to be proclaimed independent of the gover- nor of Cuba, and accountable to none but the Spanish monarch for the use of his authority. Immediately after this, he founded the colony of Vera Cruz, and the better to inspire his troops with desperate courage, burnt all his vessels, thus taking from them all hope of return. The undaunted Spaniards began to advance through a populous country towards the Mexican capital, concerning which they had ob- tained new and more ample information. It was then under the Bway of Montezuma, a prince who governed with absolute despotism. Many of his subjects and tributaries, especially those at a distance, tired of the yoke that lay heavy upon them, looked upon Cortez as a deliverer, entered into an alliance with him, and supplied him with provisions and every kind of assistance. The republic of Tlas- cala, however, did not follow their example; on the contrary, it pre- pared to repel the strangers by open force. Many battles were fought, in which that people displayed uncommon bravery; but they could not long withstand the arms and tactics of the Europeans. Finding themselves constantly overpowered, the Tlascalans at length consented to treat the Spaniards as friends, and in fact became thence- forth their most faithful and useful allies. They aided Cortez won- derfully in the prosecution of his enterprise, particularly in subdumg the great city of CJiolula, and inflicting a severe chastisement on its inhabitants for a dreadful conspiracy which had endangered the lives of all the conquerors. In the mean time, Montezuma was endeavoring, by every expe- dient in his power, to impede the progress of the Spaniards ; but Cortez overcame all obstacles, and, after a few days, finally came within sight of the vast and populous city of Mexico, which con- tained no fewer than sixty thousand houses with a proportionate number of inhabitants. It was surrounded by a lake, well fortified, and adorned with a great number of temples, palaces, and other pub- lic buildings, evincing a certain degree of civilization. Cortez entered the town, under his assumed quality of ambassador of the Spanish monarch, and was received with great pomp by Montezuma, who lodged him together with the other Spaniards, in one of his palaces. But whilst these things icok place in Mexico, an attack had been directed by a Mexican general against the colony of Vera Cruz. No sooner was Cortez informed of all the circumstances of this new act of perfidy than, in order to secure h'mself against the dangers of his 376 MODEKN HISTOKY. [P^RT 7. situation, he conceived and executed the boldest and most extraor dinary design of which history makes mention, that of arresting the emperor himself in open day, and in the very presence of his officers and subjects. Taking v^ith him a small band of resolute men, ho went to the imperial palace, surrounded Montezuma, and comj)eiled him tc come with them to their residence as a hostage. In that new abode, the astounded monarch agreed to acknov/ledge himself a vassal of Charles Y; and, in consequence of this agreement, delivered into the hands of the Spaniards a large sum of gold and silver, which Cortez distributed among his officers and soldiers with admirable dis- interestedness and equity. Every thing until now had been successful, and according to the most sanguine wishes of Cortez; but this course of prosperity was soon to meet with new obstacles. On the one hand, the Mexicans began to evince a strong indignation at the long sojourn of their sovereign among foreigners, and at the protracted stay of the Span- iards in Mexico; on the other hand, intelligence was received that the governor of Cuba, Velasquez, had despatched eighteen ships and nine hundred men to attack Cortez as a rebel. This rendered the position of the latter extremely perplexing. Should he remain m Mexico, or march against his new opponents, there was in either case equal danger of losing all the fruit of his past labors. He therefore adopted a middle course, not less daring indeed than the other two, but which offered a greater chance of succeeding on one side, without losing ground on the other. Leaving one hundred and fifty men in the imperial city under the command of Alvarado, a brave and in- trepid officer, to preserve the advantage he had already obtained; he set out with about two hundred and fifty others, to meet his hostile and imprudent countrymen. By prodigies of courage and activity, he not only surprised and defeated the nine hundred Spaniards, but even disarmed them all, made Narvaez, their general, prisoner, and taking the vanquished troops of that unskilful commander into his own service, returned in triumph to Mexico. His joy was not of long duration. The open insurrection of the Mexicans, which had commenced during his absence, became gene- ral after his return. The Spaniards were surrounded, and repeatedly attacked in their intrenchments. As, on one occasion, the danger appeared more pressing, Montezuma, made his appearance, in order to quell the sedition; but the unfortunate monarch was struck by a stone thrown by one of the assailants, and expired after three days of great suffering. His death proved fatal to the Spaniards, in whose preservation and welfare he seemed, in the end, to take a sin- cere interest. Under Quetlavaca, his successor, the attacks of the Mexicans were carried on with redoubled fury; and, although thoiir A. I). 1519 — 1523.] CONQUEST OF MEXICO, ETC. 377 sands of them were daily destroyed by the swords and cannons of the Spaniards, others fearlessly rushed forward in crowds to fill up the places of the slain, and to maintain the sangumary congest. In all these occurrences, Cortez made exertions and displayed a valor which seemed to be almost above nature. One day for instance, tie fought, though painfully wounded, during three hours, till he forced the Mexicans to abandon a post from which they considerably annoyed the Spaniards. On another occasion, having driven the as- sailants to a distance, and being entirely occupied in continuing the pursuit, he at length found himself cut off by a numerous body of enemies from his own troops. In this imminent danger, he endeavored to reach a neighboring street, which he supposed might afford him a greater facility for escape. Scarcely had he advanced in that direc- tion, when he met another party of Mexicans, and saw in the midst of them his intimate friend Duero, whom they were dragging to a temple of idols, to immolate him to their gods. Cortez, forgetful of his own peril, immediately rushed against them, dispersed their troop, ■and delivered Duero, who was even so fortunate as to find his horse and spear at a small distance. Then the two noble friends riding to- gether, pierced the crowd of their enemies, and safely rejoined their soldiers, who had just completed the defeat of the Mexicans. Cortez always considered this adventure as one of the most fortunate of nis life. It became necessary, however, for the present, to abandon Mexico. The requisite preparations for a retreat were made with extraordinary diligence and care; and the Spaniards began their march, a little after midnight, on the first of July, 1520. Silence and obscurity favored them at first; but all their motions had been watched by a vigilant foe, and no sooner had they begun to cross a breach in the causeway, than a shower of darts, arrows and stones assailed them from different sides. Dismay and confusion pervaded their ranks, and the preposterous conduct of many who were intent on preserving their riches, was an additional cause of disasters. This awful night, which justly retained the name of JVoche histe, cost the retreating army, several hundred Spanish, and more than a thousand Tlascalan soldiers, with nearly all the horses, treasure, artillery and baggage, Cortez appeared inconsolable, and was seen on the following day, when the troops resumed their march, shedding abundant tears, thus giving a mark of paternal sensibility, that endeared him to his sol- diers, as much as his consummate prudence and valor caused him to be respected. The Spaniards continued their retreat in good order, notwithsland- ing some skirmishes which they had occasionally to repel. It was rather matter of surprise, that they did not meet with more formidable 32* 378 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. attacks; but the sixth day of their march taught them the new schemes contrived by the enemy for their destruction. The Mexican forces had been secretly directed to the valley of Otumba, througn which the Spanish troops would be obliged to pass, on their way to Tlascala. When Cortez reached the neighborhood of that spot, the whole valley was already occupied by a hostile force amounting, it is said, to the number of two hundred thousand Indians, who had been collected from different tribes, as appeared from the variety of their banners and ornaments. In the midst of them, the general of the empire appeared conspicuous, borne upon a splendid litter, from which he gave his orders. He carried in his hands the imperial standard, which was never intrusted to any one but himself, and never unfurled except on the most important occasions. At the sight of this vast muhitude of enemies, Cortez fervently implored the divine assistance, and plainly told his followers, that there was no alternative now left them but to conquer or die. His plan was, to open for his troops a passage through the Indians in the narrowest part of the valley, where the confined nature of the spot would more easily render multitudes useless. Accordingly, he disposed his infantry in the form of a column, the files of which were composed alternately of arquebusiers or archers and lancers. As to his cavalry, which terrified the Indians by the mere motion of the horses, it was placed partly in front, to break the first rank of the enemy, and partly in the rear, to prevent them from reuniting. In this order, the Spaniards descended the hill, in order to commence the perilous conflict. The first discharge of the fire-arms was made with such success, that the Mexicans who were facing the Spanish column, had no time to shoot their arrows. Thej were instantly attacked with swords and pikes, whilst the cavalry pushed forward, and dispersed or crushed all who fell in their way. Considerable advantage was gained by this first onset. Similar charges produced similar results 5 but so great and obstinate was the bravery of the Indians, that, after the cavalry had forced them to retire, they fearlessly returned to the charge, and regained the ground which they had just lost, the valley of Otumba, in the mean time, resembling a stormy sea agitated by the perpetual motion of its waves. Cortez, who, at the head of the horsemen, was making a terrible slaughter wherever he directed his steps, began to fear that this mode of warfare would finally exhaust the strength of his little army. His uneasiness increased every mo- ment; when he suddenly conceived one of those bold ideas whicn great danger sometimes suggests, but only in men of uncommon energy of soul. At the sight of the imperial banner waving in the distance, Cortez A. D. 1519 — 1523.] CON-QUEST OF MEXICO, ETC. 379 remembered having heard that the fate of battles was considered by the Indians as dependent on its loss or preservation. He immediately called around him his bravest officers, Sandoval, Olid, Alvarado, with some other courageous men, and, at full gallop, forced his pas- sage towards the banner. Whilst his companions were despatching or putting to flight all who had dared to await their approach, he him- self attacked the Mexican general, wounded him, and by a powerful stroke of his lance brought him to the ground. As soon as the venerated banner disappeared from the sight of the Mexicans, they lowered the other ensigns, and, throwing down their arms, fled precipitately towards the woods and mountains; so that the valley was in a few moments entirely cleared. Aware how im- portant it was to complete their dispersion and overthrow, Cortez ordered his men to pursue them. He himself was suffering from the blow of a stone, which had broken his helmet and made a large con- tusion on his head. Both his orders, and the knowledge that he was wounded, so animated the Spaniards, that, notwithstanding the dreadful fatigue of the day, their strength seemed to be revived, and their fury to redouble in the pursuit of the enemy. According to the Spanish authors, twenty thousand Indians perished in this famous battle, which may be justly reckoned the greatest and most glorious ever fought by the Europeans against the aborigines of America.* This brilliant victory removed all obstacles from the way of the Spaniards. A few days after, they safely reached the friendly city of Tlascala, where a kind reception made some compensation for the innumerable hardships which they had hitherto endured, and pre pared them for new and more decisive efforts against Mexico. The attention of Cortez was constantly directed to the grand object his mind had previously in view; and difficulties rather increased than diminished his courage. Having granted his troops the repose which they needed, and given permission to reembark in the ships of Narvaez to those among his followers who were afraid of another expedition, he devoted all his time and care to the levying of a suffi- cient force. His good fortune, or rather Divine Providence, seconded his efforts beyond his expectation. Bands of brave soldiers , with arms and ammunition, successively came to him from different quar- ters of the Spanish settlements; the sulphur of a neighboring volcano enabled him to provide nearly as much gun-powder as might be wanted; thousands of the Tlascalans and other tribes in the neigh- borhood offered to assist him in the conquest of Mexico: in fine, • The interesting particulars of this battle may be seen in the Spanish historian Solis, Conquista de la Niieva Espana, lib. iv, cap. 20; — also iu the English authors of Univ. Hist. nol. cxiv, pp. 354 — 357; — in La Harpe^ dbregi de Vhisloire des voyages, vol. xiv. pp 484 — 488; etc. 880 MODERISr HISTORY. [PART 7. (here were found sufficient materials to build as many brigantines, as would be nececessary to secure the command of the lake by which the city was surrounded. When all things Were in readiness, Corlez, for the third time, approached the capital of the Mexicans, and commenced the regular operations of a siege. By his command, the attack was made under the direction of Sandoval, Olid and Alvarado, at three different points along three causeways leading to the town. Each of these brave captains had under him thirty or forty thousand ladians, with two hundred Spaniards and two pieces of artillery. Cortez reserved to himself the attempt to gain possession of the lake, as being the object on the attainment of which the success of all their exertions chiefly depended. His penetrating mind having easily perceived that this was the surest way to conquer Mexico, he fitted out for this purpose a flotilla of thirteen brigantines, each of which had, besides sails^ twelve Indian rowers, twenty-five Spanish soldiers with a captain at their head, and a piece of ordnance. Cortez selected for himself the swiftest of these vessels, that he might the more easily afford assis- tance wherever it should be needed. The brigantines, disposed in a single line, advanced across the lake towards Mexico. At some distance from the shore, a small island, or rather a large rock, on which was a castle defended by bodies of Indian troops, attracted the notice of the Spanish general. When he drew near, the Mexicans, believing their post to be inaccessible, loaded the Spaniards with insults and threats. Cortez thought that such insolence ought not to go unpunished, especially in the sight of the capital and in the presence of its inhabitants, who were ob- serving from their balconies the movements of the European flotilla. He therefore landed, for a moment, with one hundred and fifty men, and the castle was assaulted at two different points with such vigor and success, that one part of the garrison feU by the sword, and the other was obliged to escape by swimming. This easy triumph gave occasion to another of much greater im- portance. Whilst Cortez and his troops were detained in the island [he Mexicans had suflScient time to collect their canoes on the othei side of the lake, to the number of at least four thousand, with which they advanced towards the enemy. This incredible number of boats, the agitation of the waves, the glitter of the arms and ornaments ol the Indians, presented a spectacle at once magnificent and terrific. Cortez however beheld it without the least emotion, and merely con sidered it as a warning to prepare for the combat ; only, in order to oppose a larger front than before to tne enemy, he now caused his ships to be drawn up in the form of a crescent. No sooner had he given the signal for the attack, than all the brigantines, urged forward A. D. 1519 — 1523.] CONQUEST OF MEXICO, ETC. 381 at the same time by the oars and by a favorable breeze, bore down upon the Indian boats with irresistible impetuosity, and, notwith- standing the gallant resistance of the Mexican chieftains, threw them into a state of confusion more easily conceived than described. Nor was the result for a moment doubtful, as the arms of the Spaniards, a favorable wind, and the very bulk of their vessels, gave them, from the beginning of the action, a decided superiority. Great numbers of the Indian canoes were broken to pieces by the artillery, sunk by coming in contact with the brigantines, or dashed against one another; the remainder, closely pursued by a victorious enemy, made a narrow escape. Thi5 great naval victory made the Spaniards masters of the lake, and considerably hastened the capture of Mexico. The three divi- sions of the land army being now aided by their victorious fleet, gra- dually advanced along the causeways, and proceeded into the very streets of the imperial city, not, however, without terrible obstacles and several bloody conflicts, the Mexicans being occasionally successful in repelling the attacks of the besiegers, and disputing every inch of ground with incredible obstinacy. In these desperate encounters, the Indians were animated by the example of their young and magnani- mous emperor, Guatimozin, who had lately succeeded Q^uetlavaca, and who left nothing untried to save his country and empire. But the combined efforts of the sovereign and of his subjects served only to place in bolder relief the consummate abihties of the Spanish gene- ral. His measures were so well concerted, and the attack so admira- bly conducted by himself and his officers, that, m spite of every ob- stacle, the three divisions of the army reached the centre of Mexico nearly at the same time. The other parts of the city were soon forced to surrender; and, as the provinces quickly shared the fate, and followed the example of the capital, the capture of Mexico, in August, 1521, may be considered as the real epoch of the downfall of the Mexican empire. The siege had lasted three months, and cost the hves of one hundred and fifty thousand Indians. The empero/, with his court and family, had endeavored to escape but all were taken prisoners. The Spanish soldiery greatly disap- pointed in the amount of treasures which they had expected to obtain in the city, determined, in order to discover them, to put the unfortu- nate Guatimozin and his chief minister to the rack. That prince endured the torture with invincible constancy. Most historians relate that hearing his fellovv-suffc-rer complain, he turned to him and said : "And myself, am I on a bed of roses 7" Cortez rescued him on this occasion, from the hands of the soldiery ; but Guatimozin being afterwards accused of treason and conspiracy, was condemned 882 MODEKN HISTORY. [PART 7. and put to death about the year 1523. Thus perished the last elnpe- ror of Mexico. Cortez himself soon experienced the vicissitudes of fortune. The conquest of an empire at first acquired for him from Charles V the honorable title of viceroy of the rich and extensive regions which he had subdued, and his indefatigable activity in improving and enlarg ing his conquests entided him more and more to honors and rewards. But he was doomed, like Columbus, to be the victim of envy. Twice was he obliged to cross the ocean, in order to vindicate his innocence; and although he defended it with success, he saw his authority gra- dually declining, until, through the influence of his enemies, it dis- appeared entirely. His great services now seemed to be forgotten". the conqueror of Mexico was treated with a sort of indifference by the court of Spain, and could scarcely obtain an audience from his sovereign. It is said that, as he one day made his way through the crowd which surrounded the carriage of the emperor, Charles asked him who he was : " I am," replied Cortez, " the man who gave more provinces to your majesty than you inherited towns from your ancestors." In fine, baffled in all his hopes of recovering his former dignities, he retired to a little town near Seville, where he died at the age of sixty-two years (a. d. 1547). The life of Cortez exhibits a variety of exploits so extraordinary, that, were it not for the testimony of the best historical documents, they would rather appear to exist only in the imagination. The burning of his fleet, after landing on unknown shores; his attack of a powerful empire with a handful of men ; the capture of Monte- zuma in the midst of his own capital; the defeat of Narvaez ; the victory of Otumba; the siege and conquest of Mexico, with aU their circumstances, present a series of truly wonderful events — events almost unparalleled in the annals of history. Even amongst the greatest conquerors, few possessed, in as high a degree as Cortez, prudence in counsel, sagacity in his plans and measures, intrepidity in their execution, and energy of soul in the severest trials. The greater were the dangers and hardships to which he was exposed, the more did hi? courage, presence of mind and military genius appear. To these brilliant qualifications he joineda religious mind; a sincere modesty, which made him think it no disgrace to ask for advice; a constant probity and generosity, which gained him universal confidence anc esteem; in fine, a dignified gravity in his public deportment, and an amiable kindness and decent gaiety in the ordinary course of social and domestic life.* * It would be unjust to charge this hero with certain acts of cruelty com- mitted during the Mexican war. He was perhaps too hasty in consenting, Uiough he did so with reluctance and for fear of worse consequences, co tlie A. D. 1524 — 1534.] CONQUEST OF PERU, ETC. 383 It is certain then, notwithstanding the attacks of envy and preju- dice, that the conqueror of Mexico was every way deserving of the extraordinary success which attended his arms. If jealousy endea vored to depreciate his transcendent merit during life, justice openly proclanned it after his death; and posterity will ever distinguish Hernando Cortez among the many eminent personages of whom Spain so justly boasts, as one of her most conspicuous heroes. CONQUEST OF PERU.— FRANCIS PIZARRO— a. d. 1524—1534. The same is to- be said of the conqueror of Peru, Francis Pizarro, a man whose courage, energy and magnanimity were not inferior to those of Cortez, though he had fewer occasions to display them on the field of battle. Having entered into a compact with Diego de Almagro, another intrepid adventurer, and collected a small band of followers, he sailed, in 1525, from Panama, and began to explore the shores of the Pacific ocean. His first attempts at discovery were attended with little success. A variety of obstacles, contrary winds, distempers, and the like incidents, often impeded his progress, and so dispirited his companions, that nearly the whole crew once aban doned him and returned to Panama, not more than thirteen hardy men consenting to remain with him upon a desert coast, until he should receive a fresh supply of soldiers and provisions. By hia persevering efforts, he succeeded, under the sanction of the Spanish government, in collecting a body of about two hundred men, for the beginning of the year 1531. With new ardor he advanced into the very heart of Peru, an extensive monarchy governed by sovereigns called Incas, and the richest country in the world for mines of gold and silver. torture and execution of Guatimozin ; but, whatever may have been the fury of some soldiers, all historians agree in praising the habitual modera- tion and generosity of Cortez. He waged, it is true, a terrible warfare against the Mexicans, but it should be remarked, first, that he did not com- mence hostilities until he had been treacherously and repeatedly attacked by them ; in the second place, that, even in the midst of his victories, he constantly offered them peace, which they refused; and, in fine, that he had to fight for the noble cause of humanity against enemies not less ferocious than implacable, and addicted to the barbarous custom of immolating hu- man victims, to the number of at least twenty thousand every year. The project of extirpating this monstrous barbarity was, on the principles of the ablest divines and civilians, Snarez, Grotius, etc., sufficient of itself to jus- tify the military expedition of Cortez, and to render it a just and honorable enterprise. 884 _- MODEKN HISTORY. [PART 7. The Peruvians were not less awed than the other nations of America, at the sight of men mounted upon formidable animals, and carrying thunder in their hands. The whole country was divided at that time into two hostile parties headed by the late Inca's sons, who had just made an appeal to arms for the decision of their quarrel con- cerning the succession to the throne. Huascar, the elder, was at first victorious : but being afterwards defeated, he fell into the hands of his younger brother, Atabaliba, who committed great cruelties on this occasion. Both princes were anxious to secure the protection of the strangers, and Pizarro did not fail to take advantage of circum- stances so favorable to his views. Without manifesting his real designs, he marched on to meet the usurper, and, after some useless conferences, so vigorously attacked the Peruvian troops, whose number amounted to upwards of thirty thousand men, that four thousand of them were killed, and the others dispersed, without the loss of a single soldier on the side of the Spaniards. The proud monarch was made prisoner, and, being soon tired of his captivity, he offered for his ransom to fill up with pieces and vessels of gold a room twenty- tv/o feet long and seventeen- broad, as high as his hand could reach, and double that quantity of silver. The stipulated sum was paid to the Spaniards : still Atabaliba did not recover his liberty ; but on cer- tain charges of an odious treason, and also as a punishment for his brother's murder, he was put to death in the year 1533. The two principal cities of Peru, Q,uito and Cusco, surrendered to the Spaniards, with scarcely any show of resistance (a. d. 1534). The rest of the empire was also subdued in a short time; and, the better to secure its allegiance, Pizarro founded, at a short distance from the sea, the rich and celebrated city of Lima. Unfortunately, obstinate and bloody quarrels began to arise among the conquerors themselves about the partition of their conquest. Pizarro prevailed for a time over the party of his opponents : but, disdaining to give credit to the n:!telligence of a conspiracy against him, he finally became its victim. On the twenty-sixth of June (a. d. 1541), he was suddenly attacked m his palace at Lima, by a crowd of vile assassins, who, in their fury, made the air resound with the cry, aimy with the ty-rant. His friends and servants being either killed or dispersed, he remained alone, without betraying the least sign of fear. Surrounded as he was by murderers, he defended himself with heroic courage, killed some of the assailants, wounded others, and at last, having himself received a mortal wound, fell and expired in the midst of them, whilst recommending his soul to his Creator. Such was the deplorable end of one of the most illustrious con- querors of the New World ; of one, to whose undaunted Talor and invincible constancy, Spain was indebted for the subjugation of ]A. D. 1535 — 1559.] CHARLES v., ETC. 385 the Peruvian empire, and Charles V for the invaluable mines of Po- tosi. After his death, civil wars continued to desolate Peru, until the chief leaders of the first expedition had all disappeared. It was only in 1548 that the virtuous governor Pedro de la Gasca succeeded, by his consummate prudence, in terminating those Wars, and in estab- lishing the Spanis.i government on a permanent basis in that envia- ble country. The Spaniards acquired also, about the same time, the extensive territories of Chili and Paraguay ; and the Portuguese pro- fited by their example, to form valuable settlements along the coasts of Brazil. CHARLES V CONTINUED— ACCESSION OF PHILIP II, AND FIRST TRANSACTIONS OF HIS REIGN.— a. d. 1535—1559. Whilst the empire of Charles V was thus increasing abroad to an immense extent, that prince continued to astonish Europe by the display of his military and political talents. War having been re- newed between him and Francis I, Charles generally maintained the superiority which he had previously acquired; still, when he at- tempted, in 1536, to invade France at the head of formidable forces, he was compelled to retire with considerable loss. The year before, the emperor had undertaken an expedition into Africa, for the purpose of checking the alarming progress of Barba- rossa, a famous pirate chieftain. Having met him near Tunis, he defeated him in a great battle, took the city and rescued from twenty to thirty thousand Christian slaves. Another expedition of the same kind, directed against Algiers, in 1541, was far from obtaining the same success: dreadful storms both on sea and land destroyed half of the emperor^s fleet and army, and obliged him quickly to depart from those perilous shores. So unfortunate a result was so much the more painful to Charles, as he had conceived and followed up the project of conquering Algiers, contrary to the advice of the celebrated admiral Andrew Doria, and other able generals. However, through- out that series of disasters, he evinced such courage, firmness, mag- Danimity, and above all, so tender a solicitude for his distressed sol- diers, as fully to atone for the partial loss which he sustained in hia reputation with regard to prudence and military glory. The same alternation of success and misfortune accompanied him in his wars against the Protestant princes of Germany. He signally defeated them at Mulbert (a. d. 1547), but they recovered from this blow, and continued to give him considf^ablo trouble till the year 1552, when an agreement was entered into by both par ies. 33 r .1 386 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. * After having been thus long the chief potentate of Europe, after havino- filled the whole world with the fame of his glorious achieve- ments., this mighty emperor abandoned all earthly grandeur for an obscure and private life. He left the imperial dignity to his brother Ferdinand, resigned the Spanish crown with all its appendages and foreign dominions to his son Philip, and retired into a monastery of Hierony mites in Spain (a. d. 1556). In that peaceful abode he hved two years, dividing his time between spiritual exercises and innocent employments. The manner in which he closed his mortal career was as extraordinary as his life. Stretching himself in a coffin, he caused the funeral rites to be performed, and after the ceremony, re- ared, in a state of deep melancholy, to his apartments, where he was seized with a violent fever, and died on the twenty-first of September, in the fifty-eighth year of his age. His reign, together with that of his grand-father Ferdinand and that of his son Philip, undoubtedly forms the most brilliant part of the history of Spain. The famous rival of Charles, Francis I, had descended before him into the grave : he was succeeded by Henry II, a prince equal to his father as well in bravery as in his determined opposition to the house of Austria. This hostile feeling Henry II had often evinced during the emperor's life ; new causes of excitement urged him to manifest it again in the beginning of Philip's reign. Accordingly, France and Spain continued to be engaged in war against each other under their new sovereigns; and, in consequence of the marriage of Philip H with the English queen Mary, England interfered in favor of the Spanish monarch. In the year 1557, the war assumed a most serious aspect. The confederates, amounting to seventy thousand, under the command of the duke of Savoy, invaded the French territory, and laid siege to St. Q.uentin, a tovv^n of Picardy defended only by a handful of soldiers. The high-constable of Montmorency, at the head of an army of thirty thousand men, undertook to relieve the place, and really succeeded in augmenting the garrison ; but, not having withdrawn in due time from the approaching enemy, he was overtaken by superior forces, and compelled to engage in a very unequal contest. His defeat was en- tire; his cavalry fled; five thousand of the infantry were killed or wounded, whereas the Spaniards did not lose more than eighty men, and several other thousand among the vanquished, together with their chief officers, the constable himself, eighty-eight banners, and and all the artillery and baggage, fell into the hands of the con- querors. The battle of St. Q^uentin might have proved the downfall ol tho French monarchy, had the conquerors pursued their advantage with- out delay. They wasted their time in taking some inconsideraWe A. D. 1509 — 1588.] ENGLAND UNDER THE TUDORS. 887 towns, until the autumnal rains obliged them to retire beyond the frontier. Henry improved the happy circumstance, by speedily mus- tering new forces, which enabled him, in the very next campaign, not only to stand upon the defensive, but even to attack with suc- cess. The duke of Guise, a general justly renowned for having a few years before compelled the emperor Charles to abandon the siege of Metz, was now placed at the head of the army, with the title of lieutenant-general of the kingdom. His prudence and valor fully answered the confidence reposed in him. After deceiving the allies by a skilful march, he suddenly appeared before Calais, and attacked it so vigorously, that this famous town, hitherto considered impregnable, was taken after a siege of eight days. It had been du- ring two hundred and ten years in the power of the English, who lost with it their last possession on the continent (a. d. 1558). At the news of this event, so unexpected, and, under existing cir- cumstances, so glorious for France, all nations admired the vigor of her national spirit and the extent of her resources. No later than the ensuing year, a treaty was concluded between Philip and Henry, in virtue of vi^hich they restored to each other nearly all their late conquests; but Calais, with some other places, remained in the pos- session of the French. This loss sustained by the English, naturally leads us to mention the other great transactions both civil and reli- gious which took place in England under the government of the Tudors. • ENGLAND UNDER THE TUDORS.— a. d. 1509—1538. After the prosperous reign of the first Tudor, Henry VII, the English sceptre passed in 1509, into the hands of his son, the famous Henry VIII. For the space of about twenty years, the new mo- narch enjoyed a great reputation, and increased the glory of his king- dom, by a wise administration at home, owing chiefly to the abilities of his prime minister. Cardinal Wolsey, and by brilliant success abroad, in his wars against the French and the Scots j (see above, page 365). A vile passion Avhich he would not restrain, transformed him into a despicable prince and a cruel tyrant. Wishing to repudiate his lawful wife, Catherine of Arragon, for the purpose of contracting another marriage with Anne Boleyn, a lady of his court, he applied to Pope Clement VII to obtain a dispensation ; but it was refused as opposed to the divine law. The dissolute monarch disregarded the refusal; and not content with marrying Anne Boleyn, he, in his anger, abolished the papal jurisdiction in his kingdom, and assumed 388 MODEEN HISTORY. [PART 7. to himself the exercise of all spiritual supremacy over the English Church (a. d. 1534). From that time, he made his own will the only rule to be followed in Church and State; persecuted both Catholics and Protestants; and spared neither his wives nor his most illustrious subjects, such as Bishop Fisher and Chancellor More, who were put to death for refusing to admit the assumed power, and to obey the wicked orders of the tyrant. This unhappy prince died in 1547. Under his son and successor, young Edward VI, and by the exer tions of the regent, the duke of Somerset, the Protestant doctrine became the rehgion of England. Mary, the eldest daughter of Henry VIII, reestablished the Catholic worship in 1554; but, in 1563, it was again discarded by her sister Elizabeth, who founded the Church of England as it now exists. Mary, exasperated by the revolts which disturbed her reign, had treated the Protestants with great rigor; Elizabeth, without having any such cause, treated the Catholics "With still greater severity, and, under the influence of unprincipled ministers, began to frame those oppressive statutes which disgraced the English legislation for nearly three centuries, and have in parti- cular weighed so heavily upon Catholic Ireland. Two other events of remarkable importance contributed to render the reign of Ehzabeth for ever famous in a double point of view. The first was the death of the queen of Scotland, Mary Stuart, upon a scaffold, in 1587. This unfortunate princess, persecuted with invete- rate hatred by an unnatural brt)ther, and other enemies of her faith, ner authority and her person, had been obliged to seek a refuge in England, where, instead of an asylum, she. found a dreary prison. After eighteen years of confinement, she was brought to a trial to which history affords no parallel, and, upon a variety of slanderous and atrocious charges, was condemned to capital punishment, which she suffered at the age of forty-two, with truly Christian fortitude. All Europe shuddered with horror at the crime of her enemies; and Elizabeth endeavored in vain, by affected tears, to wipe away the foul stain for ever imprinted on her own character by this deed of darkness. The other event alluded to, and which, in a political point of view, did great honor to the English queen, was her triumph over all the maritime forces of Spain. Hitherto, she had, by proper and constant encouragement, placed her own navy on a respectable footing. The famous admiral Drake successively attacked the coasts of San Do- mingo, Florida, Peru and Chili, laid waste the Spanish settlements, and each time returned loaded with rich booty. Afterwards, he attacked the coast of Spain itself, and captured or destroyed eighty vessels in the harbor of Cadiz. These attacks were too flagrant and too often repeated, not to pro- A. D. 1560 — 1571.] WAR AGAINST THE TURKS. 889 7oke open hostilities from Pliilip II. After patiently suffering them for a time, he at last determined to take ample revenge, and prepared, at immense expense, a formidable fleet for the invasion and subjuga- tion of England. It was called the Invincible Armada, and consisted of one hundred and fifty enormous vessels, carrying nearly three thousand cannons, with numerous troops and the flower of the Span- ish chivalry. Nothing was spared to secure the success of the expe- dition; England trembled at the approach of this powerful armament: but she was soon relieved frojn her fears by the intrepidity and skill of her admirals. They carefully shunned a general action, confining themselves to partial engagements, in which they were constantly successful. After the Spaniards had begun to suffer various losses by this mode of warfare, a multitude of incidents aided the exertions of the English, and a series of violent storms completed the defeat ot the Armada (a. d. 1588). The loss of the Spaniards in this unhappy expedition was aston- ishing; but it produced not the least effect upon Philip, who received the disastrous intelligence with as much tranquillity as he would have done that of a signal triumph. "I had," said he, ''sent my fleet to fight against the English, and not against the winds. Let the will of God be done. I thank him that he has given me so many resources to repair this disaster.'' WAR AGAINST THE TURKS.— SIEGE OF MALTA.— LOSS OP CYPRUS.— BATTLE OF LEPANTO.— a. d. 1560—1571. We may now revert to the affairs of the Turks, and to their new efforts against the Christian nations. At the time when Phihp II began to rule over Spain, Soliman, the conqueror of Rhodes and Belgrade, was still seated on the throne of Constantinople. A war having arisen between these two mighty sovereigns for the posses- sion of Tripoli in Africa, a great naval battle was fought in 1560, in which the Turks were completely victorious. This success embold- ened Soliman to undertake other conquests ; and resentment urged him to attack once more the knights v( St. John, the greatest ene- mies of his power, and to drive them, if possible, from the new resi- dence which the liberality of Charles V had conferred on their Order, Accordingly, an army composed of forty thousand choice troops, under the command of three able generals, Mustapha, Piali and Dra gut, was landed in 1565 on the shores of Malta, and immediately began a siege which, from the uninterrupted vigor of the attack and defence 33* 390 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. during the space of four months, may be reckoned the most memo rable event of this kind recorded in liistory. The number of the knights and soldiers in the whole island did not exceed nine or ten thousand men; but the Grand-Master, John Parisot de la Valette, was a host in himself. This worthy successor of Peter d'Aubusson and Villiers de I'Isle-Adam, had, like them, a mmd incapable of fear even amidst the greatest dangers, a wonderful prudence and ability much improved by experience, and an intrepid valor constantly animated by religious and patriotic principles. The plan which he adopted from the beginning of the siege, and which he followed up with unshaken constancy, was to defend, by the most vigorous exertions, every fort, every post, every inch of ground, against all the efforts of the Turks, hoping in this manner so to ha- rass them and diminish their numbers, as finally to compel them to evacuate the island. In consequence of this noble determination, sharp skirmishes daily took place, retarding the progress of the assailants. A little fort, called St. Elme, stopped their whole army for several weeks ; nor could they take it except by sacrificing eight thousand of their bravest warriors; which made one of their greatest generals exclaim: *^If the son has given us so much trouble, what must we expect from the father!" The garrison of that fort, composed of a few knights and some hundred soldiers, exhibited a spectacle never seen before. They not only repelled the conthiual assaults of the Janizaries, as long as succor could be sent to them by the Grand-Master; but, even when ail communication was cut off, and when they were reduced to a small band, they continued, though wounded and scarcely able to move, to defend the breach against thousands of assailants. As loss of blood and complete exhaustion did not permit some of them any longer to fight standing and with one hand only, they sat upon chairs and benches, and, wielding their swords with both hands, combated to their last breath. Fort St. Elme was not taken, till after the death of all the knights who had generously devoted themselves to its defence. Still more awful and bloody was the struggle, when directed against the principal forts of the island, and against the town Id which most of the knights resided. Desperate courage on the on« side, undaunted intrepidity m the other, daily rendered the ram parts of Malta a theatre of unparalleled feats of. arms. The energy of the Grand-Master seemed to have been transfused into the souls of his brave companions, and the valor of the knights to have commu nicTited itself to all the inhabitants; and such was the admiration which the spectacle of their noble heroism excited, that all classes of the people wished to partake in their glorious exploits. Thus, on A. D. 1560 — 1571.] WAR AGAINST THE TURKS. 391 one occasion, a band of some hundred boys, with their shngs, greatly contributed to repel a furious assault; on another, two sailors con- trived the best measure to defeat one of the most dangerous attacks of the infidels. Persons of every age and condition labored day and night in repairing the walls, or making new intrenchments, without being frightened by the scenes of carnage, and by the sight of the dead and of the dying. Even females, forgetting their usual timidity* went forward to help their fathers, husbands or sons, and fearlessly appearing upon the breach, threw upon the assailants boiUng water and oil, melted pitch, fire-works, and even large stones, which they would not have been able to move in any other circumstance. As to the Grand-Master, besides continually watching every motion of the enemy, and properly directing all the efforts of the besieged, he seemed to multiply himself, in order to be present at every attack. The imminent danger of death, which he braved a thousand times, never caused him any fear or disturbance. Having, in one of the assaults, received a deep wound, he generously disregarded it, and continued fighting until the Turks were repelled. At another time, his nephew, brave knight, whom he very tenderly loved, was killed at a short distance from him; La Valette contented himself with saying: *' To- morrow we shall have time to weep for the loss of my nephew ; let us now avenge his death, by forcing our enemies to fly." Being told that Mustapha, the commander-in-chief of the Turks, had sworn to put all the knights to the sword, and preserve the Grand-Master alone, to bring him before the sultan, "I v^^ill prevent him from doing (hat," coolly replied La Valette: *'if, contrary to my expectation, the result of the siege should prove fatal to us, rather than suffer myself to be taken prisoner, I would put on the dress of a common soldier, throw myself into the thickest bands of the enemy, and fight until a glorious death should unite me to my brethren." This noble intrepidity, ably seconded by the undaunted courage of the knights, and the Maltese soldiers, could scarcely fail to be crowned at last with full success. Yet, the Turks were not dispirited ; and for a long time they seemed to derive new strength and ardor from their very defeats, their shame at not having hitherto been able to subdue a handful of warriors, making them perform prodigies ot valor. Besides having recourse to the ordinary modes of warfare, they every day invented new engines to annoy the besieged. Some- times, by means of powerful machines, they threw barrels filled with gun-powder and case shot, so prepared as to burst upon the ramparts and spread death among their foes. On other occasions, they pushed forward to the walls wooden towers, from the tops of which their musketeers might, with deadly aim, shoot down every human being that appeared upon the breach. The besieged, on their side Were 392 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. not idle in tlieir endeavors to prevent the effects of these murderous machines, either destroying them by the brisk fire ol" their artillery, or even turning them against their very contrivers. It was an awful spectacle to see the fatal barrels, before they had lime to burst, hurled back upon the assailants, the wooden towers dashed in pieces, the ladders broken, and numbers of Janizaries crushed to death at the foot of the ramparts. Not only did Mustapha, in these daily conflicts, lose many of his bravest soldiers, he had moreover the most gloomy prospect before him. Instead of reducing the inhabitants of Malta by famine, as he had, for a time, hoped to do, he began to feel the want of provisions and ammunition in his own camp. He moreover supposed the defen- ders of the besieged places to be much more numerous than they really were; dnd concluding that it was quite useless to continue the Rttack against the maritime forts, he turned his efforts against the city called JYotable, the capital of the whole island. Here also his hopes were entirely frustrated. In his perplexity, he resolved to resume the operations of the former siege ; when a body of troops, which had been promised by the king of Spain, at length arrived from Sicily. Although it consisted of only seven thousand men, this number was suflicient to raise the siege. Despondency and consternation had already begun to spread among the Turks; panic and despair suc- ceeded; and, after a single powerless discharge of musketry, they hastily fled to the shore and reembarked for Constantinople. An end was thus put to the harassing and sanguinary conflict. At the arrival of the auxiliary troops and the departure of the enemy there remained, in the residence of the knights, not more than six hundred men able to bear arms, and even most of that number had received many wounds. The Spanish and Sicilian allies could not refrain from tears at the sight of these truly invincible, but disfigured and emaciated warriors ; their beards and hair were in a dreadful state ; their garments, owing to the length of time that they had not been changed, were falUng to pieces, and covered with dust and gore. It was impossible, at such a spectacle, not to mingle lively feelings of compassion with the transports of joy caused by so happy a delive- rance. In order to transmit to posterity an authentic memorial of these surprising events, the small town, around which so many exploits had been achieved, received the appellation of victorious cily, which it still retains. A great and truly noble object now occupied the mind of La Va- lette. In consequence of the furious siege just ended, most of the houses and fortifications were destroyed, the cannons were broken to pieces or greatly damaged, the stores and arsenals were without ara- mumtion, the coffers without money, the forts without sufficient gar- A. D. 1560—1571.] WAR AGAINST THE TURKS. 393 risons, and those parts of the country which Lad been the theatre ot the war, almost without inhabitants; in a word, Maha was in such a state of desolation, that the bravest knights lost all hope of evei see- ing it recover its former prosperity, and expressed a desire that Sicily should be selected as the residence of the Order. But the Grand- Master, who, even in the utmost distress, had never consented to yield any thing, was much less willing now to abandon that glorious soil so well fitted to produce new laurels. All the Christian princes applauded his magnanimous sentiments, and readily assisted him in carrying out his views. Having therefore chosen a favorable spot, ne laid the foundation of a new city, which he destined to become the principal seat of the Order of St. John; and the work was prose- cuted with so much diligence and activity, as to be nearly completed in the space of five years. The city took the name of her illustrious founder. La Valette, and being protected both by nature and art, was deservedly reputed the strongest place in Europe. The intelligence of his army's defeat threw Soliman into a pa- roxysm of rage; he trampled under foot the letter of his general, and swore vengeance against the Christians. He however thought it prudent not to attack again the heroes of Malta, and rather chose to tent his resentment against the Christian islands of the Archipelago. Afterwards, the indefatigable sultan led his Janizaries, for the fourth time, into Hungary (a. d. 1566). The storm at this period burst upon Sigeth, a small, but well fortified town, whose brave garrison of three thousand men, and its intrepid commander. Count Nicolas Serini, bound themselves by a solemn oath, if they could not conquer, at least to die together in defence of their religion and their country. Never was there a generous promise better and more resolutely ful- filled. For the space of two months, they successfully resisted an army of one hundred and fifty thousand Turks, destroying upwards of thirty thousand of the foremost among the assailants. At last, fin ling their own number reduced to two hundred and fifty, they thiew open the gates of the fortress, and rushed into the midst of the Janizaries, where they all fell whilst fighting with desperate cou- rage; only two soldiers, who ^vere left for dead on the field of battle, afterwards recovered from their wounds. Thus Sigeth fell under the power of the Turks, but not until it had become, as it were, a heap of ruins, without any one left to defend it any longer. Soliman had not the satisfaction to see the end of that destructive siegs ; his disap- pointment, roused tofury by so obstinate a resistance, brought on an attack of apoplexy, of which he died three days before the last con flict. As, however, the ultimate result was the consequence of his exertions, tbe capture of Sigeth may be justly accounted as one of 394 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. the exploits, and as the last, but dearly-bought victory of that re- nowned sultan. Although implicit credit should not be given to all the encomiums bestowed on Soliman by the Turkish writers, since various instances of cruelty and restless ambition are found in his life, which are a stain on his memory ; still it must be confessed that his reign was at least one of the most brilliant and successful of the Ottoman dy- nasty. This prince nearly equalled Charles V, his contemporary, in activity, prudence and warlike genius. A. famous conqueror and a great general in the field, he was also an able politician and a wise legislator at home ; he left behind him many useful institutions ; he embellished Constantinople, built a powerful navy, protected learn- ing, and, by his munificence, justice and liberality, not only secured to his person and government the respect of his Mahometan subjects but even on many occasions was an object of admiration to the Chris- tians themselves. Selim II, who succeeded Soliman on the Turkish throne, did not possess the military qualities of most of his predecessors, and yet sue cessfuUy carried on their plan of aggrandizement and conquest. Looking with a jealous eye at the rich island of Cyprus, then in the possession of the Venetians, he equipped a numerous fleet and army, in order to bring it under his power. The greater part of the country surrendered without opposition, Nicosia and Famagusta being the only places that ventured to sustain a siege. The former was taken at the expiration of seven weeks j the latter held out four months, during which the Turks lost, it is said, forty thousand men, and were obliged to fire one hundred and fifty thousand cannon balls. They sullied their victory by shocking cruelties, and the defenders of Cy- prus expiated in tortures the guilt of their vigorous resistance. Above all, the resentment of the infidels vented itself on the intrepid comman- der of Famagusta, Marc Antony Bragadino, whose heroism on that —occasion will be remembered by the latest posterity. This great man, being, contrary to the terms of the capitulation, cairied into captivity, experienced the most barbarous treatment from the Turkish general, Mustapha, and was finally flayed alive, without betraying the least symptom of pain, but piously reciting the fiftieth psalm, until he ex- pired in the hands of the executioner. This barbarity of the Turks roused the indignation, while their in creasing power excited the fears, of Christendom. To avert the dan rrer which threatened at once religion and civilization in Europe, Pope Pius V exerted all his faculties, authority and zeal. He, on one hand, by letters and embassies, procured the conclusion of a powerful league, consisting of his own states, the kingdom of Spain and the republic of Venice; on the other hand, he endeavored to se- A. D. 1560 — 1571.] WAR AGAINGT THE TURKS. 395 cure victory to their cause by fervent supplications, and by ordering tiie dismissal from the Cliristian host of ail persons whose vices and immorahty might provoke the wrath of heaven. This being done, the combined fleet, consisting of about two hundred and forty vessels, under the command of Don Juan of Austria, a half brother to Phihp II, went in search of the Turkish fleet, which was still more nume- rous. The belligerent parties came in sight in the gulf of Lepanto; and nearly on the same spot where Augustus and Antony had for- raerly contended for the Roman empire, were the Christians and the Mussulmans now about to fight for the possession of Europe. The seventh of October 1571, witnessed one of the most terrible naval battles recorded in history. For several hours the conflict all along the line was awful, and victory uncertain. At length, the per- severing courage of the confederates, the intrepidity of Don Juan and other generals, their superior skiU in naval and military tactics, in fine, a strong and favorable breeze which arose just at the beginning of the battle, and carried clouds of smoke towards the Turks, gave the Christians a decisive victory. The fierce Ottomans lost in that memorable action thirty-five thousand soldiers, with their admiral and chief ofiicers, fifteen thousand Chidstian slaves, about two hundred and fifty men-of-war and galleys, three hundred and seventy-two large guns, and an immense booty with which their vessels were loaded.* So signal an overthrow every where spread terror and dismay among the Turks, particularly in Constantinople; whereas the vic- tory of the confederates filled the Christian Avorld with exultation. In Rome, Toledo, and other places, it was celebrated with extraor- dinary rejoicings; the Venetians, above all, manifested their enthu- siasm by forbidding any one to mourn for the loss of those who had perished in the glorious conflict. The conquerors, it is true, did not know how to pursue and improve their victory as much as might have been expected; yet, it cannot be denied that its result was of an im- mense advantage, since it proved not only a check to the progress of the Ottomans, but was also the beginning of their decline, at least as a maritime power. * A more detailed account of the battle of Lepanto may be found in Univers. Hist. vol. lx; — Mi^not, Hist, de V Empire Ottoman {reign of SO' hm II ) ; — Hist, du Bas-Empire, continuee par Ameilhon, vol. xxvir; — also in the Eccles. historians, Bdraut-Bercastel, and Fleury, or rather his con- tinuator, ad arm. 1571 ; and Alban Butler's Life of St. Pius V, under the fifth of May, with the notes. 396 MODEEN HISTORY. [PART 7. PHILIP II CONTINUED.— THE REPUBLIC OF HOLLAND.— FRANCE UNDER THE LAST VALOIS AND HENRY IV.— GENERAL STATE OF EUROPE IN THE BEGINNING OF THE SEVENTEENTH CENTURY.— a. d. 1566—1618. The prosecution of the Turkish war did not occupy the whole at- tention of Phihp II; he was also, during the same period, and for many years after, engaged in a series of hostihties against Holland. That country, which, had been dependent on Spain ever since the ac- cession of Charles V, began openly to shake off the yoke in 1566, under the pretence of political and religious tyranny. Neither the severity of the duke of Alva, nor the abilities of Don Juan, nor the he- roic qualhies of Alexander Farnese, duke of Parma, could reestab- lish in it the Spanish domination; and, in spite both of conferences and arms, the repubhc of Holland, or of the Seven United Provinces, was proclaimed in 1581. It rapidly increased during the first part of the following century; and, by uniting an active spirit of trade and maritime enterprise with great military skill and numerous exploits on land, it acquired such prosperity, wealth and power, as frequently to counterbalance the influence of the mightiest sovereigns of Eu- rope. However, it was not universally acknowledged as a free and mdependent state before the year 1648, in the treaty of Westphalia. The Spanish monarch was more successful in his expedition against Portugal. Not long before, under the reign of Emmanuel and John III, this kingdom had reached the height of opulence and glory. One single act of imprudence on the part of the young king Don Sebastian, in 1578, caused it not only to fall from the high rank which it held among European nations, but even to lose for a time its independence. Contrary to the advice of his wisest counsellors, that impetuous monarch obstinately wished to engage in an expedition against some princes in Africa. A battle was fought, in which he displayed surprising valor, but finally met with a complete over- throw: the Portuguese troops were cut to pieces, and he himself disappeared, and was never seen afterwards. As he left no issue, the crown of Portugal was claimed by many competitors, who pre- pared to support their pretensions by recourse to law, or by force of arms; but Philip of Spain, who was beyond comparison the most powerful of all the aspirants to the throne, overcame his rivals. Por- tugal was subdued in one campaign, and, with its numerous settle- ments in other parts of the globe, remained annexed to the Spanish monarchy during sixty years, viz: from 1580 to 1640, when a sud- den and successful revolution restored it to its native princes. A. D. 1566—1618.] PHILIP II., CONTINUED, ETC. 897 By the addition of Portugal and its appendages to his nereditary dominions, Philip II became the sovereign of the most extensive monarchy that had hitherto existed. Several countries of Europe and Asia, and nearly all the regions of America until then discovered, obeyed his laws ; hence he was used to say, and with truth, that the Bun never set on all his dominions at once. Nor was his mind un- equal to the task of regulating so vast and so complicated a machine. He was continually watching over the different provinces of his amazing monarchy, there being no department of the public adminis- tration with which he was not familiarly acquainted, no affair of im- portance to which he did not personally attend, no minister of state, no general of his army, whose public conduct he did not diligently observe, in order to keep all within the bounds of duty. Philip moreover exercised a considerable influence over the other states of Europe, particularly France ; he even cherished for a long time the hope of placing one of his children upon the French throne. That kingdom, after the vigorous reign of Henry II, had fallen into a deplorable state under his weak succcessors, Francis II, Charles IX, and Henry III, owing chiefly to an almost uninterrupted series of civil wars between the Catholics, who wished to maintain the ancient faith, and tlie Huguenots or Calvinists, who were anxious to establish their own religious system. The evil was increased, in 1572, by the massacre on St. Bartholomew's day, in which many, hundred Protestants were, by an act of cruel retaliation, immolated to the resentment and vengeance of the court.* At the death of Henry III, who fell by the sword of an assassin in 1589, Philip II endeavored, by every means in his power, to exclude the nearest heir, Henry of Bourbon and Navarre, who was a Protestant, from a throne which had always been occupied by Catholic monarchs; bul the many victories of Henry, enhanced by his truly royal qualhies, and finally his return to the Catholic Church,t baffled the projects and frustrated tlie hopes of the Spanish sovereign. All obstacles were removed in 1595, and the king of Navarre, the head of the Bourbon family, was universally acknowledged king of France under the name of Henry IV ; a name, notwithstanding the individual frail- ties of the monarch, ever to be held in grateful remembrance for the * See note N. ^The conversion of Henry IV was not, as the infidel Voltaire presumed to assert, owinj; to political and interested motives, but tlic fruit of doctri- nal conferences held in his presence. Havins; asked the Protestant divineo whether he could be saved in the CathoHc reli>2;ion. anfl bein^; answereART 7. for a long time doubtful. At length, the Swedes, by uncommon and desperate efforts, remained in possession of the field, but lost their mvincible leader, who was slain during the hottest part of the action (a. d. 1632). This accident was more fatal to them, than the deieal of their army would have been. For, although several able com- manders, by order of their senate, continued the war with great vigor, yet they wanted his penetrating genius; and no later than the yeai 1634, the Swedish army was signally overthrown by the imperiahsts in the battle of Nordlingen. This victory of Ferdinand raised his party again, whereas the loss of eighteen thousand men weakened his opponents to such a degree, that France, their most powerful ally, was obliged, from that time, to take the principal share in the prosecution of the war. The French throne was, at this period, occupied by the son ot Henry IV, Louis XIII, a just, bravo and religious prince, who had given many proofs of great personal courage and of a successful administration. Louis, it is true^ did not seem much inclined of him- self to make foreign conquests; but he possessed in the person of Cardinal Richelieu, a minister of state equally skilled in conceiving mighty plans, and in carrying them into execution. This powerful genius had hitherto rendered very important services to his sovereign and country, by destroying the excessive power of some of the lords, and giving the last blow to the feudal system; by crushing the rest- lessness of the Huguenots, rooting out the seed of new civil wars, and subduing La Rochelle, the principal seat of discontent and rebel- lion ; in fine, by establishing the French academy, and laying the foundation of the glory of the following reign. He had just raised the kingdom to this state of prosperity, when the Swedes experienced that defeat at Nordhngen, which obliged their allies to make greater exertions against the common enemy.' Hostilities were now carried on principally between Austria and France. As each nation pos- sessed brave troops and skilful generals, numberless exploits were achieved on both sides; still no decisive action took place for several years, so that neither the emperor Ferdinand II on one hand, nor Louis XIII and Richelieu on the other, lived to see the termination of the war. It continued under Ferdinand III, and during the minority of the young king Louis XIV, who began, at the age of five, a glorious reign which lasted seventy- two years. Its very beginning, in 16'13, was marked by a brilliant victory. The duke of Enghien, better known under his subsequent name of the prince of Conde, had been, a short time before, placed at the head of the French army. The first act of his military career was to conquer and destroy, near Ro- crcjy in Champagne, the formidable Spanish infantry so renowneJ X. D. 1625 — 1660.] CIVIL WAR IN ENGLAND, ETC. 401 for its discipline and valor ever since the time of King Ferdinand V. This victory, gained by a general scarcely twenty-two years of age, gave France a decided superiority, which the same prince, together with his rival in glory, ihe marshal of Turenne, strengthened more and more by his subsequent triumphs at Friburg, in 1644, Nordlin- gen, in 1645, and Lens, in 1G48. So many victories for one party and losses for the other terminated, towards the close of the year 1648, in the famous treaty of Munster and Osnaburgh, commonly called the treaty of Westphaha. By that treaty, the authority of the emperor was reduced to narrower limits, and by a natural consequence, which the French plenipotentiaries endeavored in vain to avert, the Catholics lost much of their influence in Germany. Holland was formally acknowledged as an independent slate, and valuable possessions were acquired to France and Sweden. Thus was peace restored in the greater part of Europe; but, the treaty of Westphalia not having been fully accepted by the Spanish king, Philip IV, who still cherished the hope of retrieving his late defeats, hostilities continued for some years longer between him and France, As to England, she had been, nearly all that time, too deeply engaged at home by dissensions and civil wars, to take any active share Id these distant broils of continental Europe. CIVIL WAR IN ENGLAND.— COMMONWEALTH.— RESTOEA- TION.— A. D. 1625—1660. The whole reign of James I had passed in comparative tranquil- lity;* but this was rather a deceitful peace, and one of those calms wh'-ch prognosticate a storm. At his death (a. d. 1625), he left to his son Charles I, an empty treasury, a refractory parliament, a kingdom given up to religious disputes and distracted by rival socie- ties, the principal of which were the Episcopalians or Anglicans and the Presbyterians or Puritans. James had always desired to put down the latter of these two parties, but he left the work to be accomplished, * It was under this reign that some infuriated persons, nominal Catholics, forrned the horrid project, called the gxm-powder plot, of blowing up the parliament-house during the session. The plot was detected, and its authors met with condign punishment : unfortunately, several innocent per- sons were involved in their ruin, and prejudice went so far as to tlirow the blame upon the whole body of Catholics ; as if Catholics at large could bo accountable for the conduct of a few desperadoes whose plot^they never knew — or the code of Catholic principles answerable for a crime which it slways cond jmned and abhorred ! 34* 402 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. if possible by his successor ; and when Charles made the attempt, he met with a resistance which proved the cause of his own ruin. An order had been issued for the general adoption of the Anglican doctrine and liturgy even in Scotland. The Puritans, who were numerous and powerful there, boldly opposed the royal decrees, and swore to defend their manner of worship against every attack, from whatever quarter it might proceed. In order to quell the insurrec- tion, Charles marshalled an army, and led it towards the frontiers ; still, yielding to his inclination for peace, he consented to come to an agreement with the Scots, though at the risk ot diminisbing his authority. This act of condescension, instead of dissolving the Scot- tish covenant, seemed rather to give it new strength ; and the cove- nanters grew bolder than ever, especially when they saw their cause openly supported by the English parliament, which was still more opposed to the court than themselves. This parliament seemed absolutely resolved to thwart the monarch in all his views, and to strip the crown of its best prerogatives. Charles yielded on many points ; but, finding all his condescension of no avail in reestablishing concord and tranquility, and moreover, never receiving the necessary subsidies, he had recourse to arms, and summoned around him those who were still attached to his person, his government, or his fortunes. The parliament also raised troops ; the exasperation of both parties burst into an open flame, and civil war in every part of the realm was the dire consequence (a. d. 1642). This revolution seemed at first favorable to Charles, who gained in person great advantages, and forced one of the parliamentary armies, under the command of the earl of Essex, to capitulate and surrender. But these successes of the royal cause were counteracted by the loss of the bloody battle of Marston M oor, fought in the north of England (a. d. 1644) ; and, on the fourteenth of June of the ensuing year, the still more fatal battle of Naseby deprived the king of nearly all his resources. Believing that there was no safer way to escape from the fury of his enemies than to take refuge among the Seots, he deter- mined to throw himself upon their loyalty, and to surrender himself into their hands. This was running from one danger into another ; the Scottish army (not the nattona,t large), after a short hesitation, shamefully delivered him to the English parliament for the sum of four hundred thousand pounds. A new party had now arisen in England, very appropriately called the Independents, because in reality they claimed an entire indepen- dence in all matters both civil and religious. At their head were Fairfax and Cromwell, two men famous in the history of those times, the former for his valor and skill in the command of armies, the A. D. 1625 — 1660.] CIVIL WAR IN ENGLAND, ETC. 403 (atter for his intriguing genius and uncommon talent in every sort ot political and military transactions. With a boundless ambition, which ne artfully concealed under the veil of modesty and religious zeal all means, whether just or criminal, were equally good in his sight provided they would promote the object of his designs. In a short time, his ability raised him to the chief command of the troops, his refined intrigues to the first rank in his party, and his artful ambition to the sovereign power. Cromwell had contributed more than any one to the overthrow of the royaUsts in the battles of Marston Moor and Naseby. Possessing, on that account, vast influence in the army, he made himself master of the king's person, and, confining him in a prison, defeated all the attempts that were made to set him at liberty. Afterwards, the bold usurper appointed a committee, which he took care to compose of his warmest partisans, for the trial of the royal captive. Charles indeed refused to acknowledge the competency of that tribunal, and answered the absurd charges laid against him by a dignified silence or a smile of contempt; still, the proceedings went on with unusual rapidity : after a mock examination, he was outlawed, condemned to death as. if he were a foe to the English nation, and, in fine, exe- cuted in London on the thirtieth of January (a. d. 1649). His most faithful defenders and friends soon experienced the same fate; and England saw with dismay her most distinguished lords perish on the scaffold. On this sanguinary foundation a commonwealth arose in the place of the ancient monarchy, a new constitution was published, and shortly after Cromwell was acknowledged as head of the govern- ment under the title of Protector. In the mean while, great and numerous were the obstacles which he had to encounter every where. No sooner had the intelligence of the king's death spread abroad, than parties were formed in Ire- land, Scotland, and England itself, against the usurpers. A man of ordinary talents would have sunk under these accumulated obstacles j Cromwell overcame them all by his prudence and activity. After giving in charge to some of his generals to quell the insurrection in England, he himself rapidly passed over to Ireland, compelled by the superiority of his forces the inhabitants to submit, and, returning with the same celerity, advanced against the Scots, whom he sur- prised and defeated at Dunbar (a. d. 1650). This overthrow did not prevent Charles, the eldest son of the late monarch, from penetrating into England at the head of fourteen thousand men. But Cromwell closely followed him, met the royalists again near Worcester, and gained over them a complete and decisive victory; Charles succeeded, with extreme difficulty, in saving his life, and escaped into France by crossing the channel in a boat. 404 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. Cromwell returned in triumph to London, and thenceforth occu- pied himself in securing the prosperity of the realm by a vigorous and wise administration. Although the government was called a republic, he acted more absolutely than perhaps any English king had ever done, dissolving the parliament whenever it opposed his views and measures. Tranquillity was restored to England ; litera- ture, arts and sciences were protected, and useful laws enacted, aa well against blasphemy and luxury, as for the maintenance of order and justice. Commerce also was revived, and the navy greatly increased. Whilst he was thus securing the prosperity of his government at home, Cromwell caused it to be also respected abroad. " I wish," said he, " to see the British commonwealth as much honored by other nations, as the Roman republic once was.'' Accordingly, the English vessels triumphantly swept every sea; haughty conditions were imposed on the rival powers of Europe j and the Dutch, who alone ventured to question the superiority of the British flag, were soon compelled to respect it in a series of great naval battles, in the last of which they lost their celebrated admiral Van Tromp. Cromwell received still greater honor, in beholding his alliance sought with equal eagerness by France and Spain. Between these two nations, war had already lasted more than twenty years, although of late it had begun to languish, owing to the civil feuds which dis- turbed the minority of Louis XIV and divided the attention of the French court. After some hesitation, the Protector preferred the alliance of France, and afforded the young king such assistance in troops aad vessels, as to destroy the equilibrium which had so long protracted the war against Spain. As a compensation for this efli- cient aid, and an indemnity for the expenses incurred, he required that the important city of Dunkirk should be besieged, and the keys delivered into his hands, and that France, moreover, should afford no refuge or protection to the exiled sons of Charles L In consequence of this treaty, preparations were made for two grand expeditions. A British fleet, under the command of Blake, went in search of the Spanish forces, and gained two victories near the shores of Spain and Africa ; and Jamaica was also conquered by the English, in whose possession it has since continued. On laud. Marshal Turenne, already famous for many glorious campaigns and victories, led his army, composed of French and English troops, to the fiiege of DunKirk. The Spaniards, on their side, were not idle ; they approached the French hues for the purpose of raising the siege, but were entirely defeated in the celebrated battle of Dunes, the more honorable to Turenne, as he vanquished at once three able genersds, viz. Don Juan the commander-in-chief, and also the prinoe of Conde I BRITISH AND FRENCH COLONIES, ETC. 405 and the duke of York, both of whom, discontented with the court of France, had gone over to the party of the Spaniards (a. d. 1658). Within a few days Dunkirk capitulated, and, according to the previous agreement, was surrendered to the English. Two other vic- tories, and the capture of several other towns, terminated that deci- sive campaign, which was soon followed by the conclusion of peace between Spain and France on terms very advantageous to the latter. The prince of Conde was included iu the treaty between the two crowns. Cromwell did not witness the termination of the war, having died a short time before, just when the prosperous issue of his alliance with France had raised him to the zenith of his glory. However, neither in this nor in any other successful scheme had he ever en- joyed real happiness. From the moment in which he was invested with the supreme power to that of his death, his mind labored under a constant dread of assassination ; nor were his numberless precau- tions and multiplied guards able to remove his fears. The nights es- pecially he passed in a most feverish anxiety, never sleeping twice, or more than twice in succession, in the same chamber, and taking care that, besides the principal door, there should be some other se- cret one for the facility of escape. He died at the age of fifty-nine (a. d. 1658), on the third of September, the anniversary of the vic- tories obtained by him at Worcester and Dunbar, the former seven, the latter eight years before. Almost simultaneously with Cromwell fell the form of government which he had established. Richard, his son, was, it is true, appointed Protector in his place j but, possessing neither the abilities nor the ambition of his father, he soon resigned the office, and the English, being at length tired of so precarious a state of things, agreed to re- call the royal family of the Stuarts. The .whole affair, admirably well conducted by General Monk, afterwards called the duke of Al bemarle, was finally accomplished in May 1660, when Charles If was, with universal satisfaction and applause, replaced upon the throne of his ancestors. BRITISH AND FRENCH COLONIES IN NORTH AMERICA These successive changes of government were adopted, without much difficulty, by the numerous settlements which England already possessed in North America. It would have been impossible for these rising colonies, especially at such a distance, efficaciously to re- sist the course of events that took place in the mother-country j 406 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. the more so, as many of the emigrants had a long and bloody strug- gle to maintam against the Indians, whom, it must be acknowledged, they rather harshly treated almost from the beginning, and who, ia return, frequently opposed with all their might the rise and progress of the English settlements. Notwithstanding these obstacles, the colonies gradually improved, and, at length, by dint of labor, indus- try and courage, became very prosperous. The most remarkable of them were established under the govern- ment of the Stuarts, and in the following chronological order: Vir- ginia, in 1607, by Episcopalians; — JVew Amsterdam, or JVew York, in 1614, or thereabouts, by the Dutch; this colony lost the former, and took the latter name in 1664 or 1665, when it passed under the power of the English; — Massachusetts and Boston, in 1620 — 1630;*— Maryland, in 1632 — 1634, by Catholics, according to the plan of Su George Calvert, Lord Baltimore, a nobleman of liberal character and distinguished abihties, and under the direction of his sons Cecilius and Leonard Calvert ; the city of Baltimore was not however built till a much later period: — Pennsylvania and Philadelphia, in 1681 — 1682, by duakers, under the celebrated William Penn, to whom that portion of the American territory was ceded by the British court ad a reward for the services of Admiral Penn, his father. In these two last States, a system of equity, humanity and meek- ness was adopted with regard to the Indian tribes, which did great honor to the first settlers, and greatly contributed to their rapid in- crease and early prosperity. A still more distinguishing feature of the colony of Maryland is the example of Christian moderation and mildness which she gave to her sister colonies; an example hitherto unknown in the history of America. For, whilst Virginia and New England were dooming, the former to exile, the latter to still bars hex treatment, all who dissented from their respective creeds. Lord Balti- more and his associates, without in the least admitting rehgious in- difference, being themselves sincere Catholics, removed however all idea of religious persecution, and legally recognised, from the begin- ning, that civil freedom of conscience which has since been adopted by the Constitution of the United States. It was also chiefly during the course of the seventeenth century, that the French made regular settlements in those parts of North *• Some years later, were founded most of the other New England States Those of Delaxuare and New Jersey were first settled by Swedes and Dutch, shortly after New York. Lord Clarendon and other English emi- grants commenced, in 1663 — 1670, the establishment of Carolina; but i'. was only in 1729 that the country was completely divided into North nnd South Carolina. Georgia was settled in 1732 — 17'35. The other States of the Union, "besides those mentioned above, are of much more recent date I REIGN OF LOUIS XIV. 407 America, which they had previously discovered, particularly in Cana da. Criamplain, an active and enterprising officer, founded Q,uebec in 1608; and in 1642, Montreal began to rise, and soon after to pros- per under the active care of zealous settlers, and especially of tiie congregation of the Sulpitians, to whom the whole island was ceded about this time. Louisiana also became one of the French colonies, though somewhat later. New Orleans not having begun to exist be- fore the year 1718. Florida belonged at that time to the Spaniards. SPLENDOR OF THE REIGN OF LOUIS XIV. When the restoration of the Stuarts to the throne of England took place, Louis XIV" of France had been king for seventeen years* but, as he fully relied upon the experience of his mother, Anne of Austria, and on the consummate skill of his prime-minister. Cardinal Mazarin, he at first interfered little in the government of his king- kom. However, even at that time, he occasionally evinced such an energy of character, as plainly to indicate what he might effect in a subsequent period. Mazarin died in 1661, and Louis, then twenty- three years old, took the reins of government into his own hands, and never afterwards relinquished them, nor ceased to hold them in Q manner suitable to his power and dignity. He soon verified a saying of the deceased cardinal, that there was in him sufficient material to make four kings. Every branch of the public administration assumed under him a grand and majestic as- pect. He settled with precision the extent of power to be exercised by each one of his ministers ; required them to come to an account with him at stated hours; and, whilst he encouraged them by sincere marks of confidence, carefully observed their proceedings, lest they should abuse their authority His manner of governing, alike dig- nified and courteous, secured to him the respect of foreigners and the afftction of his own people. Military discipline Avas enforced, the public revenues were managed with prudence and wisdom, and strict order was observed in the courts of justice. Safe and capacious har- bors were in a short time constructed and made ready to receive all Vinds of vessels; the canal of Languedoc, a work not unworthy of the genius of ancient Rome, opened an easy communication between the Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea, and a powerful navy was equipped, to contend for the empire of the ocean with tne chief maritime forces then in existence. Under this mighty impulse given to every improvement, commerce and industry increased, splendid manufactories arose, which ostou- 408 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. ished the world by the beauty and elegance of their productions in porcelain, looking glasses, tapestry, etc. The academies of sciences, belles-lettres, sculpture and painting, were no sooner established than they issued master-pieces of every description. Architecture dis- played all its magniJBcence m the palaces of the Louvre and of Ver- sailles. All the fine arts, with the various branches of hterature and useful knowledge, were encouraged, enlivened, protected both at home and abroad ; and no fewer than sixty learned men, in the dif- ferent countries of Europe, received from Louis presents and other marks of esteem, with letters no less honorable to the monarch than to themselves. France alone produced at that epoch an incredible multhude of personages highly distinguished for their qualifications j and the same age which saw with admiration Conde and Turenne, Luxembourg and Villars at the head of armies, Duquesne and Tour- ville in the navy, Louvois and Colbert in the cabinet, beheld also with astonishment the transcendent merit of Bossuet, Fenelon, Bour- daloue, Massillon, Flechier, in sacred eloquence; of Mabillon, Mont- faucon, Thomassin, Petavius, Huet, in sacred learning; of Pascal and Descartes in mathematics and philosophy ; of Lamoignon and d'Aguesseau, in jurisprudence; of Corneille, Racine, Boileau, J. B. Rousseau, Lafontaine, in poetry; etc. In a word, the reign of Louis XIV was, in every respect, the reign of taste and genius; one, during which the capital of France seemed to have become another Rome or Athens, so as to render that age, if not superior, at least equal to the most brilliant ages of antiquity. Hence the name of Louis was respected among the remotest nations of the earth, and ambassadors came from the eastern extremities of Asia to court his aUiance and friendship. Nothing however can appear so honorable to the memory of that monarch, as the great zeal which he constantly evinced for the interests of religion. He encouraged and promoted the diffusion of Christianity in the various parts of the world. It was chiefly during his reign, that crowds of pious and learned missionaries set out from France, to preach the gospel in North and South America, in China, Persia, Egypt and other countries, where they rendered invaluable services as well to the Church, as to science and to the cause of humanity. In his own kingdom, he extended the same protection to all good and useful institutions, he checked by severe edicts the practice of duelling and the profanations of the name of God, and also enact- ed various laws for the preservation of good order, tranquillity and justice. As for himself, although his personal conduct was not always irreprehensible, he however always remained strongly attached to religion, always set the example of modesty in prayer and pro- found respect in church, and ultimately atoned for the fauhs of vouth A. D. 1664 — 1669.] WAR OF FLANDERS, ETC. 409 by the piactice of solid virtues and the exercises of genuine piety in a more advanced age. With regard to the glory of arms, never perhaps did either France or any other country behold a greater and more brilliant display of military talents than under the reign of Louis XIV. This will be llie object of the following sections. WAH OF FLANDERS— OF CANDIA, ETC.— a. d. 1664—1669. The reader has already noticed the glory and advantages acquired by France in the last war against Spain and Austria. Spain was again humbled, in 1667 — 1668, by the arms of Louis, and such was the rapidity of his conquests both in Franche-Comte and Flanders, that a confederacy of the neighboring nations was thought necessary to stop his progress. A league was therefore concluded, under the name of the triple alliance, by England, Holland and Sweden, the contracting powers agreeing among themselves to settle the differences of France and Spain upon reasonable terms, capable of reconciling their opposite pretensions. By a subsequent treaty signed at Aix- la-Chapelle, the French monarch was permitted to retain his con- quests in Flanders, and the Spanish king, now Charles II, was con- tented with the restoration of Franche-Comte. In the year preceding the treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle (1667), a simi- lar transaction had taken place at Breda between the English and the Dutch, for the adjustment of their own differences. A new con- test had previously arisen among them, which laged for some years with great fierceness, much bloodshed, and enormous expense; seve- ral naval battles had been fought, equally obstinate and undecisive; however, the final result was favorable to the English, who obtained from the Dutch, by the treaty of Breda, the unqualified cession of extensive and valuable settlements in America. Louis XIV was not so much engaged in these great concerns of war and peace with his neighbors, as not to take an active stiare in the interests of more distant nations. In the year 1664, he sent a body of troops to assist the emperor Leopold against a fresh inva- sion of the Turks. This and other succors granted by different princes enabled Moniecuculli, the commander-in-chief of the Austrian forces, to fight, near the river Raab, the celebrated battle of St. Go- thard, in which the Turks were entirely defeated, and compelled to postpone their projects of invasion. Four years later, a similar though less successful assistance was sent by the French king to the Venetians, for the defence of the isbnd 85 410 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. of Candia now vigorously attacked by the same infidels. The siege, or rather blockade of the capital, also called Candia, had already lasted twenty years, when the grand-vizier, Achmet Kiuperly, determined to bring it, by redoubled efforts, to a speedy issue. He himself landed in the island, and closely invested the town with an array no less formidable for its numbers than for its valor and disci- pline. The siege still lasted two years and a half, being thus one of the most celebrated in either ancient or modern ages, for the obsti- nacy of both parties and the mighty exertions performed on each side. The besiegers stormed the place no fewer than fifty-six times ; and, in the intervals, their artillery, consisting of three hundred cannons, played with such incessant fury, as to make the ramparts of Candia so many heaps of ruins. The besieged, on their part, fired against their foes upwards of five hundred thousand bombs or bullets, expended fifty thousand barrels of gun-powder, and, besides repelling all the assaults of the enemy, made ninety-six sallies against the Turkish intrenchments. So terrible and obstinate a warfare could not fail to be extremely destructive. According to the most modern account, the. Turks, before they could take possession of Candia, lost one hundred and twenty, and the Christians, thirty thousand soldiers. There was not, all around the city, one spot which had not been moistened by the blood of many heroes. But the garrison being now reduced to a handful of men, mostly wounded, or exhausted by their exertions, it appeared evident that the place could hold out no longer ; and the Venetian commanders were at length induced to surrender it upon the terms of an honorable capitulation, which Kiuperly granted and faithfully executed (a. d. 1669). In all this, the grand-vizier, acted "with a moderation that did him no less honor than his manner of conducting and concluding the siege. This great man, still more to be admired as a minister' of state than as a general, presently applied to repair in the island the numberless calamities it had suffered from so furious a war, and his efforts aided by the natural salubrity of the climate and the fertility of the soil, were soon attended with complete success. He then returned to Constantinople, where, under the young sultan Mahomet IV, he continued to govern the state with prudence and ability until the moment of his death, which happened in 1676. To return to Louis XIY ; this monarch was more successful in checking'the depredations of the Algerine pirates, than he had been in saving Candia from the arms of the Ottomans. Squadrons which he despatched at different times, obliged those pirates to disappear for a while, and restored security to commerce on the Mediterranean sea. A. D. 16V2 — 1686.] WAR OF HOLLAND, ETC. 411 WAR OF HOLLAND— AND SUBSEQUENT EVENTS TILL THE LEAGUE OF AUGSBURQ.— a. d. 1672--1686. A still greater design engaged at the same time the attention of Louis. The Dutch having of late given him many causes of com- plaint, he resolved to humble their pride and chastise their ingrati- tude. In the year 1672, a well disciplined force of one hundred and ten thousand men, commanded by the king in person, and by Conde and Turenne under him, crossed the Rhine, and overran a great part of Holland with little or no opposition. Their march was so rapid and successful, that, in the space of two months, three of the seven united provinces were subdued, and forty fortified towns captured. The army continuing to advance, and the conqueror refusing to grant peace except on rigorous and humiliating terms, the Dutch, in their despair came to the determination of opening their dykes and inundating the country. This bold measure saved them from utter ruin, and the French finding themselves in the midst of waters, were at last compelled to retreat. In tne mean while William, Prince of Orange, who had been just appointed stadlholder of the republic, was using all his efibrts to rouse the great European powers against Louis XIV. His exertions easily induced the king of Spain, the emperor of Germany, and the elector of Brandenburg, all of whom were alarmed at the views of the French monarch, to declare in favor of the Dutch ; England alone remained at this time an ally to France, and that for two years only. In 1673, great naval battles were fought in the channel be- tween the fleet of Holland and the combined fleets of England and France, without any considerable advantage for either party. Three other engagements which took place on the Mediterranean sea, were more decisive; in the first, the celebrated Dutch admiral, Ruyter, Was worsted by the French under Duquesne; in the second, he lost his life near Messina, a maritime town of Sicily ; and shortly after, his fleet, attacked for the third time, was almost entirely destroyed (a. v. 1676). Still more important events happened on land, particularly along the frontiers of Germany and Flanders. Franche-Comte now be- came inseparably annexed to the French crown, being a second time subdued by the king, who commanded in person an army on that side. Conde, with another, attacked, near Senef. t^he united forces of the allies, surprised their rear, and, before it could receive reinforce- ments, cut it in pieces. He then bore down upon the main body of their troops, and, after a sharp engagement, forced them to abandon 412 MODEEN HISTORY. [PART 7. the field of battle. Not satisfied with this, and, like Caesar, accounting nothing to have been done as long as there remained something to do,* the victorious prince pushed forward, and, for the third time, attacked the confederates in a strong position, where all their forces were as- sembled under the command of the Prince of Orange. Here the conflict was most obstinate and bloody, the slaughter on both sides being carried on from ten in the morning till eleven at night, so as to cost the lives of fifteen, some say, twenty-seven thousand combatants. The allies, though not positively defeated, retired first from this melancholy scene of carnage, and perceiving that they were yet too closely followed by the French, withdrew to a greater distance from the frontier (a. d. 1674). Whilst Cond^ drove his opponents before him in the Netherlands, Turenne, with twenty thousand men, had to oppose, near the Rhine, sixty thousand German troops, who aimed at nothing less than the conquest of Alsace and Lorraine, whence they might, after winter, strike terror into the very heart of France. The French general, who had until then separately defeated the different bodies of their army before a junction could be effected by them, now seemed to be fright- ened at the approach of their joint numbers, so superior to his own. He therefore left the banks of the Rhine, and retiring as far as the confines of Lorraine, abandoned the whole province of Alsace to the enemy. This retreat, though admirably well conducted, and achieved without the loss of a single man, seemed contrary to tne promise which Turenne had previously made to save the French, territory from invasion, and was to every one a subject of astonishment, and the more so, as he had, at the same time, countermanded fifteen thousand men who were advancing through Lorraine to reinforce his army. In t'he mean while, the German troops freely overran all Aldace> choosing the best positions for their winter quarters, and acting with as much security as if they had been in their own native land. This was exactly the opportunity that Turenne wanted for the execution of a design which he had been maturing for two months. Having divided his troops into different bodies, he put them all in motion in the dead of winter, and without disclosing his intention to any per- son in the array commanded them to march on by ciifferent and dif- ficult roads across mountains and defiles, and to meet at the same time and place, both of which were specified. After a month of separation and painful marches, they found themselves all collected in one spot, with Turenne at their head, not far from the first of the enemy's posts. *Nil actum credens, quum quid superesset agendum. Lucan, lih^ ii, i. 657. A.D. 1672 — 1686.] WAR OF HOLLAND, ETC. 413 The chief commanders of the allies refused to believe the first in- formation that was given them of the return of the French ; but their incredulity was soon obliged to yield to the evidence of the fact Their posts were briskly attacked and obliged to surrender, theil scattered troops fell into the hands of the assailants, and those only who had been stationed at a great distance, avoided the snare laid for their destruction. Such as could escape, precipitately retreated to- wards Colmar, where their leaders had appointed the general rendez- vous. Akhough their number had been greatly diminished, it still surpassed that of the conquerors; and having, besides, taken a very advaatageous position, they could scarcely believe that the French would attack them in this their last and strongest intrenchraent. But Turenne was too skilful either to lose the opportunity of striking a decisive blow, or to forget any thing that might ensure success. No sooner had he arrived in sight of the enemy, than he posted the greater part of his forces just opposite to their front; pnd he himself, making a wide circuit with some squadrons and regimerits, suddenly appeared on their flank. The attack then commenced, and was con- ducted, on the side of the French, with such vigor and skill, that tho dispirited imperialists soon began to waver; a general flight ensued, and the sad remnant of their forces availed themselves of the dark- ness of the night to retire to Strasburg, whence, by recrossing the Rhine, they speedily returned to their own territory. This wonderful campaign filled up the measure of Turenne's rev putation and glory. In hearing its details, not only France, but all Europe was filled with admiration ; especially, when from a letter written two months before by the marshal himself to the secretary of state, it became publicly known, that so many encampments and marches, even the movements of the allies and the ultimate result of the expedition had been foreseen and planned in his mind exactly as they happened.* The ensuing year (IG75) again beheld Turenne at the head of the BVench army near the Rhine. He had now to fight against the earl of MontecucuUi, an opponent in every way worthy of him on account of his consummate ability and experience. During four successive months, these two great men exhausted against each other all the stratagems and resources of military tactics, without either of them being able, all that time, to surprise his enemy in any faulty or incon- siderate measure. Turenne, however, by his masterly manceuvres be- gan to obtain some slight advantage, and gradually gaining ground, drove the Germans from station to station, till they reached the village of SalsDach. Here he made his last preparations to give them battle^ * See Anquetil, Hist, de France, ad ann. 1674, — and Raguenet, Histoire de Vicomtc de Turenne, p. 249 86* 414 MODEKN HISTORY. [PART 7. and was already expressing lo those around him his full rontidenceol victory, when, at the commencement of the cannonade, a bullet struck him dead on the spot (twenty-seventh of July, 1675). The whole army bewailed with bitter tears the loss of that incomparable leader, whose beneficence, generosity and other Christian as well as military virtues, had gained their most devoted affection. His death was equally lamented throughout all France; and Louis, the better to honor his memory, caused him to be buried with extraordinary pomp in the sepulchre of the French kings at St. Denis, a privilege which had been granted to no private individual before, except to Du Gues- clin, in the time of King Charles V. Immediately after the death of Turenne, in order to compensate his loss, if possible, and fill his place in the army, no fewer than eight new marshals were created; but Conde was then in truth the only general capable of following up with success the plan of the deceased hero. He not only stopped the progress of the imperialists who had once more invaded Alsace, but obliged them to retire again beyond the Rhme; after which he himself was compelled by the gout to withdraw from the army. Montecuculli also resigned the" command of the imperial troops, not judging it worthy of his reputation to fight against newly appomted generals, after he had had the honor of opposing Turenne and Conde. Thus the year of our Lord 1675 closed the military career of three among the chief heroes of modem times ; just as the year 183 b. c. terminated that of Anni- bal, Scipio and Philoposmen, three of the most illustrious generals of antiquity. Conde and Tur^enne left behind them skilful disciples in the art of warfare ; and Crequi, Luxembourg and others maintained the supe- riority which the French monarch had already acquired. The king himself, with his brother, the duke of Orleans, frequently appeared at the head of his armies, and gained so many advantages, that the allies were at length induced to come to a treaty of peace, which they all signed at Nimeguen, on the conditions he had proposed (a. d. 1678 — '79). It was then that the surname of Great was conferred upon Louis, for his manifold triumphs, military and political, over the multitude of his enemies. Even the time of peace was improved by the victorious monarch to consolidate his power at home, and to extend it abroad. He re- voked the privileges which had been granted to the Huguenots by the edict of Nantes in 1598, and which had proved, many times smce, an occasion of great disturbances.* Genoa, Tripoli and Algiers having dared to brave his authority, were so severely bombarded by * See note O. A. D. 1686 — 1697.] LEAGUE OF AUGSBURG. 415 his navy, as to leave them no other resource than to send deputies to apologise for their conduct. Nor did lie act less vigorously on land against Strasburg, then a free town, which had been repeatedly guiky of a breach of faith in his regard; twenty thousand men sud- denly invested it, and in his name took immediate possession of that city, one of the most important in Europe for its position and {Strength. LEA.GUE OF AUGSBURG.— a. d. 1686—1697. J REVOLUTION IN ENGLAND. This continual increase of power again alarmed the neighboring states, and a new league, destined to check it, was formed at Augs- burg in 1686, by the emperor of Germany, the king of Spain, the republic of Holland, etc. Louis might have found an ally in the king of England, James II, who had lately succeeded his brother Charles II; but James, by granting universal liberty of conscience in his kingdom, and being perhaps too eager in favoring the hitherto op- pressed Catholics whose religion he had embraced, incurred the aver- sion of his other subjects. Seeing himself betrayed and almost univer- sally abandoned, whilst his son-in-law, the famous Prince of Orange, advanced to dethrone him, he fled, and sought refuge in France; so that the whole effort of the league of Augsburg, now rendered still more formidable by the accession of England, was directed exclu- sively against the French monarch. The first campaigns produced few important events; but, in 1690, the struggle became most animated in the various provinces which were the theatres of the war. The exiled king having, with a strong armament passed over to Ireland, where the majority of the popula- tion was favorable to his cause, attacked, with more resolution than prudence, the formidable force of his enemy near the river Boyne. The Irish and French began indeed to fight bravely, but without much order ; and victory soon declared in favor of superior numbers aided by valor and discipline. James retreated, and giving up too soon all further hope of success, departed from Ireland, which in a short time was entirely surrendered to the conquerors. Many how- ever of its inhabitants, through a heroic attachment to a dethroned and fugitive prince, followed him into France, which thi y accus- tomed themselves to consider as their own country, and whose battles they fought in subsequent years with such determined valor, that her great monarch bestowed on them the flattering name of /ris brave Irisk 416 MODEEK HISTOEY. [PAET 7. Just at the time of the defeat of James in Ireland,, an important action took place at sea. Admiral Tourville attacked in the channel, near the Isle of Wight, the combined fleets of England and Holland, and, with very trifling loss on his side, burnt or captured fifteen of their vessels. He w^as not so fortunate two years after (lb92). Hav- ing to oppose, off cape La-Hogue, ninety or ninety-nine sail under the command of admiral Russel, with only sixty-three, or, as some say, only forty-four ships of the line, he maintained indeed the une- qual contest for twelve hours, but could not prevent fifteen or seven- teen of his finest vessels from being destroyed by the English. This was a fatal blow to the French navy, of which France at this period was justly proud. England, on the contrary, recovered her maritime preponderance, and every probable hope of James II towards the recovery of his kingdom was extinguished for ever. The defeat of La-Hogue was the only severe check then sufiered by the arms of Louis XIV ; the expeditions of his land forces were much more prosperous, and, for the space of several years (1690 — 1695), they offered one continued series of victories and conquests Whilst the king in person took the important places of Mons and Namur in the Netherlands, the dukes of Noailles and Vendome sub-- diied a considerable part of the province of Catalonia in Spain ; Mar- shal Catiuat completely defeated the duke of Savoy at Stafarda and Marsiglia, and conquered nearly all his dominions : in fine. Marshal Luxembourg, by mere superiority of talent, gained the splendid vie tories of Fleurus, Steinkirk and Nerwinde, over the chief army of the confederates, taking from them so great a number of colors, that these trophies, beiog sent to Paris, and serving to ornament the cathedral, acquired for the victorious general the singular but honora- ble appellation of Tapusier de JYotre-Dame. So many triumphs reflected immense glory on France; but her very victories, which she did not obtain without great exertions and expense, gradually exhausted her strength, whereas the allies, from their superior numbers, were, like the heads of a hydra, no less pow- erful and formidable after their defeats than they were before. This chiefly appeared at the death of Marshal Luxembourg, whom an at tack of apoplexy carried off" in the beginning of the year 1695.* The confederates availed themselves of his absence from the French army, • At that awful moment, this general, one of the most skilful, active and successful that France ever produced ; who never experienced a defeat, and who filled the world with the renown of his military exploits : this celebrated man, publicly acknowledged the illusion and em^ptiness of all earthly glory. " Alas !" he exclaimed, " what will my victories avail me at the tribunal of my sovereign Judge ? Would to God that 1 could offer him, instead of so many useless laurels, the merit of a cup of water given to the poor in his name !" A. D ITOO — 1715. SUCCESSION OF SPAIN, ETC. 411 to besiege and retake the important city of Namur. Both parties be- ing now tired of the war, nothing of great consequence was performed on either side during the ensuing year 1696 ; France, however, made in 1697 a new and vigorous effort, which enabled her generals to ob- tain some advantages in Catalonia and Flanders. Moreover, her naval squadrons, under the command of Tourville,d'Estrees, Forbin, Ouguay-Trouin and John Bart, all of them excellent mariners, every where annoyed the commerce of the enemy, and bore off* im- mense prizes from the maritime towns and colonies of England, Hol- land and Spain. These multiplied losses, and the withdrawing of the duke of Sa- voy from the confederacy, at length induced the allied powers to ac- cept of the moderate conditions Louis XIY had for a long time been offering to them. On the twentieth of September (a. d. 1697), a treaty of peace was signed at Ryswick, by which the victorious monarch consented to resign nearly all his late conquests, especially those made upon the Spanish territories. Many persons found fault with that great moderation, the secret causes of which they did not perceive ; but time soon disclosed the wisdom of the king's mea- sures and the depth of his policy. SUCCESSION OF SPAIN.— DEATH OF LOUIS XIV. A. D. 1700— 1715. Charles II, king of Spain, being about to die without issue, ap- pointed for his heir and successor the duke of Anjou, his grand- nephew by his sister Maria Theresa, and grand-son to Louis XIV. The French court, after mature deliberation, accepted the impor- tant though dangerous inheritance, and the duke was proclaimed, in the year 1700, king of Spain, Naples and West Indies, under the name of Philip V. This momentous transaction again excited the jealousy and awakened the fears of Europe, and particularly of the German emperor, Leopold I, who claimed the same succession for his second son, the archduke Charles. In the course of two or three years, Holland, England, Prussia, Savoy and Portugal, either from an apprehension that the house of Bourbon might become too power- ful, or from a desire of their own aggrandizement, were induced to embrace the party of the emperor. The allies of France and Spain were the electors of Cologne and Bavaria; neutrality wtre ob- served only by the Ecclesiastical State, Venice and Switzerland. As this was also the time when Charles XII, king of Sweden, en- gaged in an obstinate and bloody contest against Poland and Russia 418 ' MODEKN HISTORY. [PART 7. it thus happened that the earhest period of the eighteenth century be- held the blaze of war rekindled throughout nearly all Europe, so as to spread its ravages from the shores of the Atlantic to the vast plainsj of Russia, and from Gibrahar to the northern pole. The British king, William III, who had been the principal leader in the two last confederacies against France, was again preparing to take a prominent part in this new league; but he died just in the beginning of the war (a. d. 1702), with the reputation of a skil- ful though rather unfortunate general, of whom it has been said that none perhaps could boast of having lost more battles. His cnief qualification was that of a profound politician; and, upon the whole, he proved to be the most successful opponent of Louis XIV. The death of that prince caused, however, no alteration in the plan of the allies; his views were followed up by his sister-in-law, Anne, who succeeded him on the throne, and his absence from the army was more than compensated by the duke of Marlborough at the head of the English, and by Prince Eugene of Savoy at the head of the imperial troops. These were the two great generals destined to interrupt the long course of the prosperity of Louis. France, it is true, also possessed at that time skilful and brave commanders, among whom the duke of Vendome and Marshal Vil- lars were conspicuous ; both gained several advantages during the first campaigns: but as they could not be present in every place where their cooperation was needed, the year 1704 witnessed a total change of fortune. Eugene and Marlborough having united their forces, attacked, near the village of Blenheim, the combined armies of the French and Bavarians, commanded by the Elector-Duke and by Marshals Tallard and Marsin. The battle was a decisive one; the Austriansand English lost indeeed twelve thousand men, but the French and Bavarians lost about forty thousand, including the slain, wounded and prisoners. The artillery, ammunition, baggage, in a word, every trophy that can distinguish a complete triumph, fell, witn Marshal Tallard, into the hands of the victors. Moreover, the whole electorate of Bavaria became their prize; and not only were the van- quished driven from the plains of Hochstadt near the Danube to the banks of the Rhine, but even the remnant of that array, which had first spread terror to the gates of the Austrian capital, was obliged to take shelter within the frontiers of France. The conquerors, finding no further obstacle, crossed the Rhine, entered Alsace, and the strong place of Landau surrendered to them before the close of the cam- paign; whilst, in a very distant quarter, the English captured also the important fortress of Gibraltar, which has ever since remained in their power. Louis XIV possessed in an eminent degree that Christian fortitude A. D. 1700 — 1715.] SUCCESSION OF SPAIX, ETC. 419 which enables the soul to bear misfortunes with composure and re- signation. Although accustomed to victory, he received without dismay the sad intelligence of the ruin of his army at Blenheim, and took the most vigorous steps to check the progress of the allies. Understanding that the duke of Marlborough meant to carry the war, by the river Moselle, into the heart of France, he assembled, oa that side, an army of seventy thousand men under Villars, whose conduct was so masterly, that he prevented Marlborough from effect- ing any measure of consequence during the whole of the year 1705. In Italy likewise, the French under Vendome maintained their su- periority against all the efforts both of Prince Eugene and the duke of Savoy. The ensuing year (1706) presented one continued series of defeats and losses for France and Spain. In the peninsula, Philip V saw his fairest provinces conquered by the allies, his very capital invaded, and his rival, the archduke Charles, proclaimed king in his place. In the Netherlands, Marlborough completely defeated Marshal Ville- roi in the battle of Ramillies, which was followed by the reduction of all Brabant and nearly all Spanish Flanders. The sudden over- throw of the French armies in Italy was the finishing stroke of that eventful year, the most singularly disastrous perhaps that France ever experienced. The duke of Vendome having been recalled to oppose Marlborough on the northern frontier, the command of the troops in Piedmont was given to the duke of Orleans, assisted by the duke of La Feuillade and Marshal Marsin, all of them full of zeal and courage, but destitute of the talent and experience of the former general. They were besieging Turin, when Prince Eugene, by d masterly and successful march, arrived from Germany at the head of fresh forces to relieve the town. The French were attacked, and in spite of their courageous resistance, were forced in their in- trenchments. Their loss on the field was dreadful, their defeat entire; and the battle, as disastrous at least as those at Ramillies and Hochs- tadt, made them lose all their conquests in Italy. Never had the arms of the conquering Louis received so severe a check as during this fatal campaign. He made proposals of peace suggested by his situation, and yet could not satisfy the enemies of France, who, elated with past success, expected greater advantages from the continuation than from the cessation of hostiHties. His affairs, however, as well as those of Philip V, seemed to take a more lavorable turn in 1707, when Marshal Villars defeated the imperialists at Stolhofen, and Marshal Berwick gained, at Almanza in Spam, a splendid victory over the united troops of the English, Dutch and Portuguese. But his return of good fortune did not last long; Philip was again driven from the capital of his kingdom, and obliged to liy 420 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. before his rival: in Flanders, a hundred thousand men, under ths dukes of Burgundy and Vendome, were routed at Oudenardeby Eugene and Marlborough ; and neither that numerous army, nor the heroic exertions of Marshal Bouflers, could prevent the victorious generals from taking the city of Lille, the strongest bulwark of France in that direction. The dreadful winter of 1709 served to increase the misfortunes of the French nation. Nearly all the fruit trees were frozen, and the harvest having failed, distress and famine became so general as to render it scarcely possible to provide a scanty sustenance for the troops. It was under these trying circumstances that they had to fight against the superior force of the allies at Malplaquet; and yet such was their ardor for the combat, that, although they had spent the day before without eating, they threw away half of the bread which they had just received, in order to rush the sooner against the enemy. The conflict was extremely fierce and bloody, the French especially fighting with desperate courage, till Marshal Villars being dangerously wounded, they began to give way ; but although they left the field, their retreat after the battle was so well conducted by Bouflers, that not one man was taken prisoner. This victory of the allies, if vic- tory it may be called, cost them the Hves of twenty thousand men; the French, though they retreated, had not lost half that number. The campaign not having been very unfavorable to Louis, he thought he could again without dishonor ask for peace; among other conditions he was required not only to abandon the cause of his grand-son, but even positively to concur in dethroning and expelling him from Spain. At the news of this harsh proposal, the king exclaimed that, since he must have war, he preferred to carry it on against his enemies rather than against his- children. The whole nation, equally indignant at the haughtiness of the allies, approved of his generous resolution and appeared ready to sacrifice their pro- perty and their lives for the honor of the kingdom, the glory of their aged monarch, and the support of a just and necessary contest. In conformity with these sentiments, new soldiers enlisted for the army, and money was still found to bear the expenses of the war. Philip V, who had also been reduced to the greatest distress in his disputed kingdom of Spain, displayed the same constancy and obtained the same success. Well aAvare that his grand-father could not furnish him with troops, he contented himself with asking for the services of the duke of Vendome, a general in whom he placed entire confidence. His hopes were quickly realized : the duke had no sooner arrived in Spain, than soldiers, through esteem for his well- known abilities, flocked to his standard from all sides; in a short time, he had collected an army of thirty thousand men, with whom A. D. 1700—1715.] SUCCESSION OF SPAIN, ETC. 421 he retook Madrid, and immediately went m search of the confede- rates, to give them battle. Having overtaken them on the ninth of December (a. d. 1710), he first surprised a body of five thousand English, who were all made prisoners with their general Stanhope, and, on the following day, he gained over the earl of Starenberg the decisive though long disputed victory of Villa Viciosa, which secured the Spanish crown upon the head of Philip. This prince was present in the battle, and fought with great courage; when worn out with fatigue, he slept upon the most glorious bed that a conqueror ever had, a bed made, by order of Vendorae, of banners taken from the enemy. Another unexpected event greatly attracted the attention of the politicians of the age. The emperor Joseph I, who in 1705 had succeeded his father Leopold on the German throne, died in 1711, and his brother the archduke, who had so long contended for the sceptre of Spain, became emperor under the name of Charles VI. This entirely changed the prospect of the war; for, had this prince been allowed to reign both over Spain and the empire, that balance of power, for the preservation of which nearly all Europe had arisen against the house of Bourbon, would have been effectually destroyed by the unavoidable preponderance of the house of Austria. Influ- enced by this and other considerations. Great Britain began to listen to overtures of peace from France, and, besides dismissing Marlbo- rough from the command of the army, gradually withdrew her forces from the confederacy. This was an important point; but, as the remaining allies still maintained at the northern frontier a formidable force under the com- mand of Prince Eugene, and kept France in constant danger of inva- sion, much was yet to be feared for that monarchy. The king him- self, with all his firmness, could not conceal his anxiety when Villars took leave of him to go and rejoin the army in Flanders. '*Sire," said the marshal with emotion, ''this is your last army!'' The king answered : *' I rely upon your zeal, and upon the bravery of my troops. Go then, and fight the enemy wherever you can find him. If, by some accident, you happen to be conquered, write to me alone: I know the devotedness of my people ; I will raise a hundred thou- sand soldiers more; and we will go togetner, either to repair all our disasters at once, or bury ourselves under the ruins of the monarchy'* (a. d. 1712). This magnanimous design was never put in execution, as it soon became known that Villars, by a skilful and bold attack, had destroyed the army of prince Eugene at Denain. The different posts of that army being too distant from each other, the French successively assaulted them with equal promptness 'ind success, bore down every obstacle, and, besides destroying the enemy's best troops, took a gn?af 36 422 MODEKN HISTORY. [PART 7. number of prisoners, with a prodigious quantity of ordnance, ammu- nition, provisions, etc. This briUiant victory not only saved France from utter ruin, but suddenly gave her a superiority of which it was no longer in the power of her enemies to deprive her, and, being fol- lowed by the rapid conquest of several towns and fortresses, accelerated the conclusion of peace. It was signed at Utrecht, in 1713, by nearly ill the belligerent powers, who agreed upon a variety of mutual con- cessions, the principal of which was the solemn recognition of Philip V as king of Spain and of the West Indies. The emperor, his rival, was offered, in compensation for the loss of Spain, several valuable provinces in Italy and the Netherlands; still, of all the allies, he was tne only one who refused the treaty. Hostihties therefore continued for some time longer near the banks of the Rhine, till Villars having gained new and important advantages over Prince Eugene, Charles VI thought it prudent to yield. A treaty* was then concluded at Radstad (a. d. 1714) between that prince and France, upon terms substantially the same, yet a little less favorable to him than those which he had rejected at Utrecht. Thus did Louis XIV, after a long series of disasters, secure by his courage and unshaken constancy a peace more glorious than that which he had obtained at Ryswick by the splendid victories of Lux- embourg and Catinat. One year later (1715), this monarch, by far the most conspicuous of his age, ended at the age of seventy-seven, a magnificent reign of seventy-two years. He had lately seen most of the princes of his family, among others the pupil of the immortal Fenelon, descend before him into the grave ; their loss, though most painful to his paternal feelings, he had sustained with his usual firm- ness and Christian magnanimity : the approach of his own death had no greater power to frighten or even disturb his noble soul. Nothing then appeared in him but piety, meekness and resignation. His last moments were those of a truly Chiistian and great monarch j of one who humbly acknowledges his faults in the hope of obtaining the divine mercy; who willingly leaves all earthly honors- because he knows their emptiness, and departs this hfe even with joy, biecause he expects a much better and happier one in the heavenly kingdom. DECLINE OF THE TURKS.— a. d. 16S3— 1718. - We shall now, after a long interruption, revert to the affairs of the Turks. The battle of Lepanto had long since proved that their progress could be checked; and the signal defeats they afterwards ex- perienced in Hungary and Poland, were no less calculated to remove A. D. 1683 — 1718.] DECLINE OF THE TURKS. 423 from their minds the notion that all Europe must pass under their sway. Vet, that warlike ardor which had so long animated their troops, still subsisted among them, and, being again stirred up by the conquest of Candia, could not be extinguished by the new losses which they suffered in Poland from the great general Sobieski. The Janizaries loudly called for new combats; and in 1683, Vienna, the capital of Austria, was invested by two hundred thousand men, Turks and Tartars. As there was not in all Germany a force sufficient to op- pose such a host of enemies, the emperor Leopold with his family fled at their approach; despondency and consternation reigned every where; and, though Vienna possessed a brave garrison, and an excel- lent commander in the earl of Siarenberg, the ruin of that city seemed inevitable. In this new danger to which Christendom was exposed. Pope Innocent XI had raised his voice to solicit the succor of Catholic princes and nations, applying chiefly to the great Sobieski, whom numerous exploits and conspicuous virtues had lately raised to the throne of Poland. That hero had several subjects of complaint against Leopold; but, generously sacrificing his resentment to the public good, he hastened at the head of twenty-four thousand war- riors, and joined the imperial troops commanded by the duke of Lor- raine. As soon as this junction was effected, they descended the mountains, and attacked the Turkish camp at three different points. The Turks, seized with a sudden panic, were routed almost without resistance ; their spirits had already drooped in consequence of the length of the siege, and the numerous blunders of their general Kara Mustapha; and now their flight was so precipitate that they left behind them, among other spoils, one hundred thousand tents, three hundred pieces of artillery, and nearly five thousand barrels of gun- powder. The conquerors, not satisfied with the liberation of Vienna and of all Germany, were eager to improve their victory by a warm pursuit of the fugitives. During this expedition, King Sobieski having on one occasion attacked the Turks too hastily, was repulsed with great loss ; but he took ample revenge two days after, by cutting in pieces a body of twenty -five thousand men near the banks of the Danube. He then returned to Poland, leav-iig the conduct of the war to the brave duke of Lorraine, who not only continued to drive the Turks before him, but also made important and extensive conquests. These advantages were secured by a new and brilliant victory gained (a. d, 1687) in the plains of Mohats, the very same spot on which the Austrians and Hungarians had experienced an entire overthrow one hundred and sixty years before. During the following campaigns, until 1698, and also at the re- 424 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. newal of the war in 1716, the house of Austria, well served all tha time by zealous and skilful generals, again defeated the Ottomans in several battles. Their most formidable enemy, during this period, was Prince Eugene of Savoy, who gained over them the decisive victo- ries of Zenta, Peterwaradin and Belgrade. These bloody contests ended in the treaties of Carlo witz (1699) and Passarowitz (1718), both of which showed the enormous losses lately sustained by the Turks, and the incontestable superiority now possessed by Christian Europe over their once dreaded and formidable empire. RISE OF PRUSSIA AND RUSSIA.— PETER THE GREAT.— CHARLES XII, KING OF SWEDEN.— a. d. 1689—1725. The rapid decline of the Turks in the scale of power and political importance, coincided with the sudden rise of Prussia and Russia to a high rank among the European nations. Christianity and civili- zation had begun to be introduced into Prussia towards the close of the crusades ; since that time, it had been governed by the Grand- Masters of the Teutonic Order, and then by the princes of the house of Brandenburg, under the title of dukes. In 1701, it arose to the dignity of a kingdom, the title of king being then conferred by the emperor of Germany on the elector of Brandenburg, Frederick I. Prussia became flourishing and powerful during the reign of the next monarch, Frederic William, and still more so under his son and successor, Frederick II, whom we shall see, after a short time, giving a strong and lasting impulse to the general affairs of Europe. Russia is also known to have been governed by a long series of dukes, and of princes called Czars, under whom it remained almost totally uncivilized, until the accession of Peter I, which took place in 1689. This prince, possessed of an active mind and a superior genius, incessantly applied himself to improve the condition of his nation, and to render it conspicuous above the neighboring states. He twice left his dominions, and travelled through different countries, in order to acquire, by experience, a knowledge of the various arts, institutions and practices which it n ight be useful to introduce among his subjects. Being attacked by cohopirators and rebels, he overcame them all, and punished them with inexorable severity. In the year 1699, Peter formed with the kings of Poland and Den- mam a coalition against Charles XII, king of Sweden, in the hope of wresting some provinces from that young prince, then only in his eighteenth yearj but it soon appeared that the allied monarchs had relied too much for success upon his youth. Charles already united die talents of a general with the intrepidity of a wariior. Fired with A. D. 1689 — 1725.] PRUSSIA and Russia, etc. 425 indignation, and seconded by his brave Swedes, he successively over- ran Denmark, Saxony and Poland, crossing rivers, capturing lov^ns, defeating armies, and carrying every thing before him. So continual and decisive were his victories, that the king of Denmark was very soon forced to accept such conditions as it pleased Charles to impose ou him ; and the king of Poland, who had offered a greater resistance, found himself compelled to resign his crown to Stanislaus Leckzin- ski, whom the conqueror protected. The exertions of the Swedish hero against the Russians were a/so for a long time extraordinarily successful. He defeated them in several engagements, particularly in the famous battle of Narva, where, with only eight thousand men, he destroyed an army of eighty thousand Muscovites, fifty thousand of whom were slam, drowned, or taken prisoners, and the rest dispersed. Having at last advanced too far into Russia, he lost in two hours, near Pultawa, the fruit of nine years' success (a. d. 1709). His half-famished and ex- hausted army being overpowered by numbers, experienced a most eignal overthrow, and Charles himself, wounded and forced to leave the field, with difficulty escaped to Bender, a Turkish town in Bes- sarabia. There he spent a long time in endeavoring to engage the Ottoman Porte in a war with the Russians. Seeing the little success which attended his efforts, he resolved, after an absence of five years and many adventures worthy of a romantic hero, to return through Germany to Sweden, which he found in a miserable condition, with- out troops, without money, without resources, and attacked on all sides by her numerous enemies. Charles made desperate exertions to defend his kingdom and retrieve his losses, but he did not live to recover his former ascendency, being killed by a musket ball at the siege of Fredericshall, a town of Norway, in 1718. His death was the signal for a general cessation of hostilities ; and Sweden hastened to conclude a peace, disadvantageous indeed, but required by the situation of her affairs. These events allowed the Czar to carry his views of improvement fimy into execution. In the course of a few years, Russia beheld with admiration the establishment in her cities, of schools, academies, manufactories, arsenals, and the rapid rise of St. Petersburg, her pre- sent capital. A powerful navy was created; harbors were opened on the Black and Baltic seas, to shelter numerous ships of the line, as welL as frigates and merchant vessels; the standing army was trained m all the exercises of military discipline; laws were enacted and measures adopted to amend the defects and polish the manners of the people. A prudent management of the public revenue enabled Peter to accomplish his grand and extensive designs without oppres- sing his subjects. By these noble efforts, occasionally disgraced how- 36» 426 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. ever by acts a.' cruelty, this prince not only laid the foundation, but also raised the superstructure of Russian greatness, and secured to himself the surname of Ch-eat. He died in 1725. WESTERN EUROPE FROM THE DEATH OF LOUIS XIV IN 1715 TO THE TREATY OF VIENNA IN 1735. The other leading sovereigns in Europe at this time v/ere : Charles VI in Germany, Philip V in Spain, Louis XV in France under the regency of the duke of Orleans, and in England George I, a prince of the house of Brunswick, who, upon the death of dueen Anne, had been called to the throne in preference to the surviving members of the house of Stuart. Peace continued among these different courts for the space of twenty-five years (1715 — 1740), except during two very short wars, one in 1718, the other in 1733. Spain under Phihp V was governed in the beginning by Cardinal Julius Alberoni, whose bold and vast genius, not satisfied with regu- lating the internal concerns of that kingdom, undertook also to change the whole political system of Europe. His general view was to raise Spain again to the pinnacle of active influence and power ^ in parti- cular he intended 1<^. to engage the Russians in a war against Aus- tria, and, through this powerful help, wrest from the emperor^s hands that part of Italy which the treaty of Utrecht had allotted to him out of the Spanish possessions. 2°. his object was to dethrone the Bri- tish king George I, in favor of the son of James II, called the preten- der; and 3°. to transfer the regency of France, during the minority of Louis XV, from the duke of Orleans to the Spanish monarch. Had these projects been successful, Alberoni would have gained a reputation, if not superior, at least equal to that of Ximenes and Richelieu ; but all his brilhant schemes were baffled by the vigilance and activity of the interested parties. The quadruple alliance formed by Germany, England, France and Holland against Spain, com pelled Philip V to adopt views very different from those of his min- ister; the Spanish troops, who had already entered Sicily and Sar- dinia, were obliged to evacuate those islands, and Alberoni fell into disgrace (a. d. 1720). Next came the war for the succession of Poland, in 1733. After the death of Augustus II, Stanislaus Leckzinski, who had already, though for a short time, occupied the Polish throne under the protec- tion of Charles XII, was a second time chosen king. But the emperor Charles VI having, with the help of the Russians, obliged the Poles to set about a new election, the elector of Saxony nis kins- A. D. 1736 — 1747.] EASTERN EUROPE, ETC. 427 man, was raised to that high dignity under the name of Augustus III and Stanislaus, as formerly, was forced to abandon his crown. Louis XV thought himself injured in the person of this prince, who had become his father-in-law, and he determined to be revenged on the emperor. The more surely to effect his purpose, he entered into an alliance, not only with the court of Spain, now almost coa- Gtantly hostile to the house of Austria, but also with the king of Sar- dinia, formerly duke of Savoy, and war was begun at the same time on the German frontier near the Rhine, and in different parts of Italy. Philipsburg was invested by a gallant army under Marshal Berwick, and although this experienced commander was killed by a cannon ball whilst visiting the trenches, the place was taken, notwithstanding the presence of Prince Eugene, who being destitute of the energy of youth, did not dare hazard a battle, to prevent its surrender. The French were not less successful in Italy, where Marshal Villars closed his military career by the capture of Milan, and Marshal Coigny, his successor, gained the bloody victories of Parma and Guastalla. In the south, still more rapid was the progress of the Spaniards under the duke of Montemar and Don Carlos, son of Philip V; they defeated the imperialists in the decisive battle of Bitonto, and, in two campaigns, rendered themselves masters of the kingdom of Naples and of the island of Sicily. Thus vanquished at every point, the emperor intimated a desire of peace, the principal terms of which were arranged at Vienna 1735. By this treaty it was stipulated that Stanislaus, instead of the crown of Poland, should enjoy the duchies of Lorraine and Bar, under the title of king, and that, after his death, these duchies should be for ever annexed to France; that the duke of Lorraine, the emperor's ally, should have Tuscany in exchange for his hereditary dominions; in fine, that, whilst the king of Sardinia would gain some districts in the north of Italy, the kingdoms of Naples and Sicily should be left to the house of Bourbon, in the person of Don Carlos. In consideration of these cessions, Louis XV agreed to restore to the empire his late conquests near the Rhine. EASTERN EUROPE— THAMAS KOULI KAN, OR NADIR SCHAH, THE PERSIAN CONQUEROR, ETC. A. D. 1736—1747. Scarcely was this peace negotiated, when a fresh war broke oul between the Russians and the Turks, in which Charles VI, owing to his intimate alliance with Russia, found himself involved. Ho 428 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. resolved to attack the Ottomans in the direction of Hungary, while his allies pressed them on the borders of the Black sea; but the im- perial commanders were repeatedly defeated, several important places were lost, and, as httle hope remained to retrieve these disasters, the emperor had recourse to the mediation of France for the conclusion of a new treaty. Anne also, the Russian empress, though recently victorious at Choczim, consented, for fear of being deserted by her ally, to a negotiation. The Turks, under circumstances so favorable to them, obtained an advantageous peace; the emperor ceded to them Belgrade with two provinces, and the Czarina agreed to withdraw her troops from the city and territory of Azof, so as to reestablish the limits between the Turkish and Russian empires as they were before the commencement of hostilities (a. d. 1739). That treaty, how glorious soever to the Ottomans, did not long retard their decline; the Russians soon reassumed the ascendency, and even about this time, the Turks were rather unsuccessful in a war which they had against Persia. Having subdued, between the years 1723 and 1733, rich and extensive provinces, their career of success was at length stopped by the famous Nadir Schah, or , Thamas Kouli Kan, who, after fighting the battles of his sovereign Schah Thamas against powerful rebels, usurped the Persian throne. He renewed the foreign war which had ceased for a while, and, though defeated three times in succession by Topal Osman, a brave and skilful general, victory declared in his favor on every other occa- sion, and the Turks were compelled to give up what they had lately conquered. After this. Nadir Schah, who seemed to have inherited the enter- prising spirit of Genghis Kan and Tamerlane, turned his arms against the rich empire of Hindostan. With only sixty thousand warriors, he destroyed or dispersed an army of twelve hundred thousand Hin- doos and Moguls, took Delhi, their capital city, and returned with 60 prodigious a quantity of pearls, gold and silver, that the amount is commonly estimated to have been upwards of a billion of dollais. He did not long enjoy these fruits of his insatiable avidity: not less dreaded by his subjects for his cruelty than by his enemies for his valor, he fell a victim to a conspiracy, and was assassinated in his tent (a. d. 1747). His death was followed by a series of revolutions so bloody and destructive, that the populous city of Ispahan sav/, within a few years, the.number of its inhabitants reduced from a mil- lion to a few thousand persons, and a long time elapsed before Persia could even begin to recover from her astounding calamities. A. D. 1740 — 1748.] SUCCESSION OF AUSTRIA, ETC. 429 WAR FOR THE SUCCESSION OF AUSTRIA.— THE PRETEN- DER IN ENGLAND AND SCOTLAND.— a. d. 1740—1748. The death of the emperor Charles VI without male issue, in 1740, threw all Europe again into war. In virtue of a previous agreement called the Pragmatic sanction, and also by the emperor's last will, his hereditar}'^ dominions of Austria, Bohemia and Hungary, belonged to his eldest daughter, Maria Theresa, who had lately married Francis, duke of Lorraine. Her claims were supported chiefly by England and Holland, but opposed by Spain, Prussia and Saxony, whose sovereigns brought forward different claims to a share in that im- mense inheritance, and especially by the elector of Bavaria, who caused himself to be proclaimed emperor at Frankfort, under the pro- tection of the French armies, and with the name of Charles VII. Every thing at first prospered according to his wishes, and the wishes of his allies ; Austria, Bohemia and Silesia were invaded by their troops, so as to oblige Maria Theresa to take refuge in Hungary. She appeared amidst the Hungarian nobles in the city of Presburg, holding her young son, afterwards Joseph II, in her arms, and earnestly recommending him to their fidelity. This affecting scene moved tlie assembly to tears; all swore to die, if necessary, for their sovereign, Maria Theresa,* and she was instantly supplied with a fresh army zealously devoted to her interests. By a sudden change of fortune, her competitor Charles VII was not only driven from his conquests, but even stripped for a time of his own hereditary domi- nions; he died shortly after at Munich, more of grief than of disease. It might have been expected that his death, and the general acknow- ledgment, on the part of the German princes, of Francis of Lorraine as emperor, would put an end to these bloody quarrels; and in fact, some of the belligerent powers hastened to conclude separate treaties of alliance; but the high pretensions of some others, particularly of Great Britain and of the queen of Hungary, protracted the war for three or four years longer. It was prosecuted with vigor chiefly by the English and French, who thus, from mere auxiliaries, became the principal actors. Even before the death of Charle? VII, the king of England, George II, had taken the command of the British and allied forces m Ger many. He was marching forward to join an additional body of auxiliary troops, when, near the village of Dettingen, he saw himself almost surrounded by the enemy, and reduced to a very critical situ- * Moriamur pro rrge nostra Mand ThereaH; such was their sudden and unanimous exclamation. 430 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. ation. In effect, by the masterly manceuvres of the French general. Marshal de Noailles, all supplies were cut off; the neighboring hills were covered with a formidable artillery ; and, had not the duke of Grammont's rash descent from the defiles into the plain with a por- tion of the army, given the allies an opportunity of fighting on equal terms, a surrender, or total destruction would, in all probability, have been the consequence. The French charged, as usual, with impetu- osity; but the English, animated by the presence of their king and of his son, the duke of Cumberbnd, received the shock with undaunted valor. After three hours fighting, the assailants were repulsed, having lost five thousand men, killed, wounded and prisoners (a. d. 1743). Two years after, Louis XV and his son, the dauphin, in theii turn defeated the army of the allies. The French king, having a large number of excellent troops commanded, under him, by Marshal Saxe, invested Tournay, one of the strongest towns in the Austrian Netherlands, and perhaps the most important place on that frontier. The combined forces of the British, Dutch and Hanoverians, amount- ing to about fifty thousand men under the command of the duke of Cumberland, advanced to its relief, and attacked the French, who had posted themselves on a rising ground in front of the village of Fon- teno}''. The battle began at nine in the morning, and lasted till three in the afternoon, being maintained all that time with equal courage by the two parties. Although the fire from the French batteries was so heavy that it swept off whole ranks at a single discharge, the Bri- tish infantry, in the form of a close column, continued to advance as if they had been invulnerable, and the French began to give way. Marshal Saxe, fearing a total overthrow, sent advice to the king to provide for his safety by a timely retreat; but Louis refused to quit his post, and his firmness contributed to gain the honor of the day. At the suggestion pf Marshal Richelieu, a fresh battery was erected just opposite to the front of the English column, at the distance of a few paces only; whilst it played upon them- with dreadful execution, the French returned to the charge, and, after seven or eight minutes ot heroic efforts on both sides, finally compelled the enemy to retieat with the loss of twelve or fifteen thousand men. The surrender ot Tournay, and of many other fortified towns in the Austrian Flandere, was the fruit of this great victory. The following years equally exhibited a vicissitude of good and iL success. The French armies experienced signal defeats at Plaisance and Exiiles in Italy, but were victorious in the great battles of Rau- coux and Laufeld, which rendered them masters of the Nether- lands. At last, by the skilful movements of Marshal Saxe and Cbunt Lowendhal, they began to penetrate into Holland, carried by A. D. 1740 — 1748.] SUCCESSION OF AUSTRIA, ETC. 431 storm cities and fortresses that were deemed impregnable, and by this rapid success obliged the allied powers to receive the favorable conditions of peace which Louis XV had been offering to them since the year 1744. He made no difficulty to acknowledge Maria Theresa for the lawful heiress of Charles VI, wilHngly restored his con- quests, and contented himself with securing reasonable advantages for his own allies, saying that he wished to treat of peace, not as a merchant, but as a Idng. This treaty was signed at Aix-la-Chapelle, in October 1748. Some time before its conclusion, and while the British forces were yet employed on the continent, Charles Edward, the grand-son of James II, the dethroned king of England, undertook to revive the claims of his family by an invasion of that country. He first landed on the shores of Scotland with one single frigate, some ammunition and a few officers. The public assertion of his rights, his promise of a just government, and the brilliant qualities of his person, soon gathered around him a little army, with which he immediately took the field. His first exploits were the capture of Edinburgh and the lotal overthrow of four thousand Englishmen at Prestonpans; he then proceeded into England, took the city of Carlisle, and advanced as far as Derby, within eighty or ninety miles of London, when the approach of the duke of Cumberland at the head of superior forces obliged him to retreat with some disadvantage, though in good order. The victory of Falkirk, which he gained in January, 1746, revived his hopes; but his subsequent defeat at Culloden blasted them for ever. Being now destitute of money and troops, without any sure asylum, constantly pursued by his enemies, always in danger of fall ing into their hands, and of ending his career upon a scaffold, want ing food and garments, wandering from place to place and from cavern to cavern, he exhausted, as it were, all the rigors of misfor- time, and endured them with so heroic fortitude, as to gain the admi- ration of the whole world. In the midst of his calamities, and although the sum of thirty thou- sand pounds was offered as the reward of his capture, he had th^ happiness never to be betrayed by any one, not even by the poor who happened to recognize him under his various disguises. As he was once quite exhausted, and almost dying of starvation, he deter mined to ask some assistance of one of his enemies whose house he perceived at a distance, whilst wandering through the country. He went, knocked at the door, and, as soon as the owner appeared: "Behold," said the young prince, "the son of your lawful sovereign; who craves a little bread and some garments. I know you are my enemy; but on your probity I rely enough to btlieve that you wiK not betray my confidence in you, nor take advantage of my extreme 432 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. distress.'^ The gentleman, deeply moved at the sight of such mis* fortune united with such magnanimity, bestOAved on his guest all the assistance which he needed, and observed an inviolable secrecy. In fine, after five months of incredible sufferings, Edward embarked on board a French frigate, and, escaping the sight of the British ves- sels which were cruising along the coast, safely reached the shores of France, whence he had sailed on his adventurous expedition. He afterwards repaired to Rome, where he died at the age of sixty- eight years (a. d. 1788). OLD FRENCH WAR, OTHERWISE CALLED WAR OF HA- NOVER, OR SEVEN YEARS WAR.— a. d.— 1756— 1763 The boundaries of the French and British possessions in North America not having been sufficiently settled by the treaties of Utrecht and Aix-la-Chapelle, there soon arose complaints of mutual encroach- ments. A fresh negotiation was indeed opened between the courts of London and Versailles, but to no effect; hostilities followed, and after being carried on for a time without any previous declaration of war, at last came to an open rupture in 1756. This new warfare, which, in a short time extended *.o all parts of the world, entirely changed, from the beginning, the political aspect of Europe. France and Austria, so long oppo«;ed to each other, now united their interests, and were joined by Russia, Sweden and Saxony. Holland and Spain kept at first a sort of neutrality j but the Enghsh, besides the superiority of their naval forces, succeeued in securing to themselves a powerful ally on the continent, Frederic II, king of Prussia, who had already acquired great renown for his ability, and gained many laurels in the preceding conflict of the Austrian succession. The first chances of war were favorable to France in almost pvery place. The English and their allies Avere defeated in North Am>^rica_, on the Mediterranean sea, in the island of Minorca, where the ',sup posed impregnable fortress of St. Philip, or Fort Mahon, was taken almost at the first onset; and particularly in the north of Germany, where forty thousand men commanded by the duke of Cumberland, experienced such reverses as to be obliged at last to capitulate. Nor was Frederic II in a better condition. After a transitory success, he had been routed by the AuFtrians ; his kingdom was ravaged by the Russians and the Swedes, and a French army was marching from another quarter to complete his ruin. In this extremity, his courage and presence of mind did not fail him : he retreated before the French, as if frightened at their approach, and took up at Rosbach a A. D. 1756 — 1763.] OLD FRENCH WAR. 433 formidable position. Here, whilst the enemy advanced against him in the hope of a sure and easy triumph, the tents which concealed his army suddenly disappeared, and the Prussians were seen in battle array, between two hills covered with artillery. At this unexpected sight, a panic seized the assailants, and they had scarcely fought a quarter of an hour, when they fled in every direction. This brilliant exploit, which was entirely owing to the genius of Frederic, restored his decaying affairs; it enabled him to repel the imperialists from Silesia, and the French also had to give up their last conquests. The three following campaigns offered a series of battles and a variety of events, which it would be equally tedious and useless to enumerate. The French now maintained their ground well enough in Germany ; but on every part of the ocean, as well as in the East and West Indies, they suffered incredible and irreparable losses. Hitherto, the Marquis of Montcalm had ably and successfully de- fended their Canadian possessions; but, as no fresh supplies could be forwarded to him across the Atlantic, where the English every where prevailed, the number of his troops daily diminished, and it was not in his power to hinder a superior force under general Wolfe from reaching the vicinity of duebec. In order, if possible, to save that capital, he ventured to give them battle. The disposition of the two armies was masterly, and the action commenced with great resolution on both sides. During the conflict, Wolfe and Montcalm, who had given equal proofs of personal courage, were both mortally wounded; the former died in the enthusiasm of victory, which he saw favoring the English, and the latter with the sad consolation of not having to witness the approaching surrender of Quebec. It took place six days later, and was followed in one year by the reduction of all Canada (a. d. 1759—1760). The same happened to the French settlements in the East Indies; sooner or later, all fell into the hands of the English. Nor could France put a stop lo that astonishing series of disasters; her navy, which had severely suffered during the preceding war, was now in a wretched condition, and though privateers greatly annoyed the British commerce, her weak squadrons were totally inadequate to cope with the imposing forces of England. The only subject ^f Uope that remained was the assistance, if it could be obtained, of the other branches of the Bourbon family, actually reigning in Spain, Naples and Sicily. Louis requested it through his ministers, and the Spanish king, Charles III, generously consented to help him with vessels and troops. A treaty to this effect was framed under the name o^ family compact; but it was of no advantage to Louis XV, and proved most prejudicial to his ally. No sooner were the English apprized of the transaction, than they directed their efforts against 27 434 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. the Spanish settlements in Asia and America, destroyec their com- merce, and made immense captures. All the resources of France were now exhausted ; one year had been sufficient to baffle the auxiliary measures of Spain ; but England herself was much depressed by the amazing efforts she had made to obtain the superiority over all her enemies. This weariness of the chief belligerent powers made all parties desirous of peace (^. d. 1763). Whilst it was concluded at Hubersburg between the Prus sian monarch and his numerous adversaries ; the British, French and Spanish courts signed the treaty of Paris, by which it was agreed that England, upon restoring a few of her conquests, should retain the whole of Canada, and many other valuable possessions. Thus did that mighty nation secure her maritime and commercial prepon- derance; though the time was not far distant, when she was to be deprived, by an unexpected revolution, of her own colonies in North America. ORIGIN AND PROGRESS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION. A. D. 1764—1776. The great accession of power and territory just acquired by Great Britain, had not been gained without enormous expenses, increased taxation, and a rapidly accumulating debt. No sooner were hostilities at an end, than the English ministry made it their chief object to find out new sources of revenue, and devise means for replenishing the treasury. North America opened to their view, so they at least flat- tered themselves, a new and abundant field for levying taxes; and, on motion of Lord Grenville, first commissioner of the treasury, the fa mous act for imposing stamp duties on the colonies was passed, in Vf^5, by both houses of the British parliament. • This act excited serious alarm among the Americans. Without altogether contesting the power vested in parliament, to make regula- tions for trade, they sternly denied its right to impose direct revenue t^es on them without their own consent. Petitions and remon- strances drawn up in energetic language, were instantly despatched to the government; nor were there wanting in England itself men of remarkable talent and eloquence, as the cele^ated William Pitt, earl of Chatham, who strenuously maintained the privileges of the Colonies. All these protests, supported by the measures which the Americans took to prevent the exaction of the stamp duties, suc- ceeded, on the accession of a new British ministry, in procuring the revocation of the obnoxious act (a. d. 17C6). A. D. 1764:— 1776.] AMERICAN REVOLUTION. 435 The rejoicings which thai repeal produced in America, were great and sincere, but still much diminished by a certain decree the parlia- ment issued at the same time, asserting its power to bind the Colo- nies in all cases whatsoever. A variety of particular restrictions fos- tered the spirit of dread and mistrust in American hearts, and subse- quent events revived all former irritation. The scheme of raising a revenue in the colonies was again practically adopted, by imposing duties on tea, glass, paper and painters' colors imported from Great Britain. The colonists opposed these proceedings, which they con- sidered as subversive of their rights and liberties, by a fresh series of petitions, remonstrances and protests, and chiefly by non-importation agreements: nor did their resentment stop there; an immense quan- tity of tea, which had been shipped for Massachusetts, not only was not suffered to land, but was even thrown into the bay by the Bos- tonians. This bold measure formed a new and momentous crisis in the re- lations between America and Great Britain. While in England bills were passed, coercive expedients adopted, and powerful reinforce- ments of vessels and troops despatched against Boston, the American States were not slow in espousing the cause of their sister Colony, in organizing a mihtia, and procuring, by every means in their power, arms, ammunition and all necessary supplies for the defence of their claims. Still, it was again the lot of the new Englanders to begin the conflict. A party of men having been sent by General Gage, from Boston, to destroy some military stores collected at Con- cord by the provmcials, were, on their way back, attacked near Lex- ington, and lost two hundred and seventy-three of their number, whereas the loss of their opponents was only ninety-three. This was the first blood spilled in battle during the American revolution. Two months later (.Tune 1775), a still more memorable action took place at Bunker Hill, or rather Breed's Hill, near Boston, between fifteen hundred New Englanders, and three thousand British regu- lars. The coolness of the provincials at the approach of a veteran force double their number, was astonishing, and the order of General Putnam not to fire till they could distinguish the whites of the ene- my's eyes, was scrupulously obeyed. The regulars were permitted to advance to within about sixty yards, when a deadly fire of small arms was opened upon them with such efl*ect, that wnole ranks were mowed down, and the line, wavering for a moment, at last broke, and gave way. They rallied, advanced again, and were again re- pulsed by the same destructive and incessant fire. A third charge, led on by General Chnton, proved more successful, and the provin- cials, who had nearly exhausted their ammunition, were obliged to re- tire but, although they left the field of battle, they could justly claim 436 MODERN" HISTORY. [PART 7. the advantage ot victory, their ]oss being only four hundred and fifty- three, that of the British, one thousand and fifty-four. The spirit displayed by the Americans in these engagements greatly increased their confidence, and urged them to new exertions. In the mean time, a general Congress of the Colonies, represented by their deputies, had met in Philadelphia for the purpose of adopting measures adequate to the important crisis. They voted to raise an army of twenty thousand men, appointed the general officers, and, on motion of Mr. Johnson of Maryland, unanimously chose George Washington commander-in-chief of the American forces. The great man who thus already possessed the universal confidence and esteem of his countrymen^ accepted the appointment with unfeigned modesty, and immediately took command of the army in the vicinity of Boston. Before his arrival, the scheme of surrounding the royal forces in that city had already been contrived, and was about to be put in execution ; Washington pursued it with such ardor and suc- cess, as to leave them no resource but immediate departure on board their vessels hitherto anchored in the harbor. Accordingly, on the seventeenth of March (a. d. 1776), the British troops, amounting to more than seven thousand men, evacuated the town, which was immediately occupied by the triumphant provincials. Shortly after this, the English having endeavored, first to surprise New York, and then to reduce Charleston by a vigorous attack, were foiled in both attempts. The Americans, it is true, were not more fortunate in their own attempt upon Canada, and rather suf- fered a considerable loss, in the siege of Gluebec, which cqgt the life of General Montgomery, and reduced Colonel Arnold to the neces- sity of retreating 5 but this unhappy expedition went at least to show the ardor of the colonists even for offensive warfare, whilst all their energies were required to defend themselves against a pow- erful enemy. All these actions however they had performed without renouncing their allegiance to the British crown. There was indeed in the Colo- nies a spirit of open and unflinching resistance to what they unani- mously deemed an invasion of their privileges; but the people and their representatives had, until the close of the year 1775, entertained the hope and expressed the desire of bringing their controversy with Great Britain to a speeedy and amicable conclusion. Unfortunately for England, her existing ministry had determined to maintain by force the right of taxation and the legislative supremacy of parlia- ment over the Colonies; and the Colonies were equally determined to repel the claim by force. The exasperation of the people in America rose to the highest pilch, when they were informed that measures for fresh hostilities A. D. 1776 — 1783.] WAR OF INDEPENDENCE. 437 had been taken by Great Britain against them, so far as to hire mul- titudes of foreign troops for a more vigorous prosecution of the war. The pubhc mind, under the constant excitement of sufferings or fears, began to think of adopting a course different from that hitherto pur sued. The winter and spring of 1776 were spent iu discussions, appeals and pubhcations of every sort, urgirig the expediency of a total separation from the mother country. The momentous step was taken into serious consideration by Congress, then assembled at Phi- ladelphia and consisting of the representatives of thirteen Colonies, viz. Massachusetts including Maine, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina,- and Georgia. After long and animated debates, a Declaration of Independence, drawn up by Thomas Jefferson, was unanimously approved on the Fourth of July, a day for ever memorable in the annals of America, and then solemnly proclaimed to the people. In this important instru- ment, the members of Congress, in the name of their constituents, after enumerating their grievances and subjects of complaint against the British government, renounced all allegiance to it, dissolved all political connexion with England, and declared the United Colonies to be free, independent and sovereign states ; at the same time, mutu- ally pledging to each other, for the support of this declaration, " their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor." WAR OF INDEPENDENCE.— A. t>. 1776—1783. The declaration of independence Avas certainly a point of very high importance for the people of the United Colonies, but to render it an efficient and irrevocable measure, it required all their energies in the open field; the more so, as the prospect of their affairs at that epoch was by no means encouraging. The British were readv to prosecute the war vigorously by land and sea. Their army consisted of twenty-four thousand of the best troops from Europe, to whom several regiments of Hessian infantry were expected soon to be added, carrying their number to the amount of thirty-five thousand men, under the command of very able generals and experienced officers, and well supplied with every thing necessary for an active and suc- cessful warfare. To resist the attack, and check, if possible, the progress of these combined forces, the American general had under his command troops not only far inferior in numbers, but still more so in military discipline, and, owing chiefly to the pecuniary embarrassments of the country ili-provided with food, clothing, arms and ammunition. It 37* 438 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. required his utmost sagacity and indefatigable efforts to train them to habits of necessary subordination and to a regular manner of fighting, and particularly to retain them in sufficient force under his banners, at a time when the ill-advised practice of short enlistments easily per- mitted them to withdraw from the service. Yei, under these trying circumstances, never did the great mind of Washington, even aftei many a defeat which neither his courage nor skill could prevent, abandon the hope of ultimate success. Never did Congress, even when surrounded by obstacles, and seeing the cause of independence on the brink of ruin, listen to any proposal of peace, except on the condition of an acknowledgment from England of the freedom of the Colonies. Like the Romans of old, who showed their contempt of the victorious host of Annibal, by selling at a high price the field on which it was encamped near their city, so the leading American patriots, far from suffering themselves to be dejected by the gloomy state of their affairs, constantly expressed their determination to carry on the struggle at all hazards, rather than ever return under British subjection. These lofty hopes and resolutions of Congress, in which a large majority of the people always concurred, were sustained not only by the consciousness of their own energies, but also by a well founded expectation of foreign alliance and succors. In fact, almost from the beginning of the war, the Colonies successfully applied to various places abroad to secure supplies of arms and ammunition ; and, though no foreign state had yet acknowledged their independence, such a number of able officers came over to them from Poland and France, as greatly added to the skill and strength of their armies. In 1778, the successful exertions of the commissioners of Congress, and particularly of the celebrated doctor Franklin, induced the French government openly to declare in favor, of the Americans. Public hostihties commenced from that moment between France and Great Britain, and the contest became still more animated, when Spain in 1779, and Holland in 1780, joined in the war against England ; whilst the league, called the armed neutrality, was also formed against her interests, by the northern powers of Russia, Sweden and Denmark. To oppose this formidable array of enemies, the English nation, roused by danger to exertions worthy of her opulence and greatness, displayed a spirit truly magnanimous, and astonishing resources Her fleets covered both hemispheres, and her armies every where fought with a valor which challenges unqualified admiration. Stilly it was easy to foresee, that, since the English were obliged to divide their forces, however successful they might be in various particular engagements, they would in the end lose the main point at issue, the recovery of their Colonies. It is true, the allied European powers A. D. 1776 — 1783.] WAR OF INDEPENDENCE. 439 did not, at least in the beginning, lend to the Colonies so direct and efficient a cooperation as might have been anticipated; yet, it is self- evident that, occupying the immense navies of Great Britain, as well in the East and West Indies, as along the shores of Europe and Africa, they afforded, by thus preventing her from concentrating her energies, an immense advantage to the American cause. The suc- cessful result of the war of independence was, therefore, to be pro- duced, and in fact was achieved in America itself, through a long series of hardships and battles, of disasters and victories. This natu- rally leads us to resume the course of military events, and relate in the order of time, those which immediately followed the declaration ol independence. Two months had not elapsed since that remarkable event, when the Colonies saw with dismay their troops signally defeated in the disastrous battle of Long Island. Washington, unable to cope with the superior forces of the English and Hessians, was obliged to evacuate not only this island, but even, a few days after, the city of New York; nor was this the end of the misfortune. At the approach of a victorious enemy, it became necessary and urgent to abandon the province of New Jersey, and cross with all speed the river Dela- ware. It was truly a dispiriting scene to behold that scanty, desti- tute and diminishing band, scarcely amounting to three thousand, pursued by a triumphant, well disciplined and abundantly supplied army of thirty thousand men. About the same time, an American flotilla on Lake Champlain was entirely destroyed, and the State of Rhode Island conquered by the British. Of all the periods of the revolution, this was the most gloomy and disheartening. It is true, so hopeless a state of things did not last long, and Washington having received reinforcements which made his army amount to about seven thousand, was enabled to raise the drooping spirits of his countrymen by a bold and successful attempt. Observing the scattered and loosely guarded positions of the enemy along tlie left bank of the Delaware, he recrossed that river on Christ- mas-day, suddenly attacked the Hessian troops at Trenton, and cap- tured about nine hundred men and officers, with the whole artillery and ammunition. Ten days later, he again defeated three regiments at Princeton, and pursuing his advantage, made such skilful ma- noBuvres as to wrest from the enemy almost all their conquests in the Jerseys, and to gain for himself among tacticians in Europe the sur- name of the Amencan Fabiiis. At the reopening of the campaign in 1777, he was again obliged to retreat before the overwhelming ibrce of the British, and even, in consequence of the unfavorable actions of Brandywine and Germantown, to leave Philadelphia for a time in the power of the enemy ; yet, he so well conducted his army, so ju- 440 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 7. diciously chose the positions for his encampments, that the conque- rors were unable to derive any material advantage from their progress and victories. It was during the course of these expeditions of the commander-in- chiefs that the memorable attack of Stony Point look place. The British having fortified this post and manned it with a strong garri- son, Washington, whose camp was not far distant, determined to dislodge them, and despatched for that purpose General Wayne with a detachment of infantry. Wayne arrived near the fort in the even- ing, and, dividing his men into two columns, directed them to assault it at opposite points, and, without firing, to depend entirely upon the bayonet. The attempt, though extremely bold and hazardous, was executed with incredible courage. The assailants forced their way across a morass covered by the tide, and, though exposed to a galling fire of musketry and grape shot, they fearlessly went on, till they met in the middle of the fortress. They lost, it is true, ninety-eight men slain or wounded, and the general himself received a severe wound, whilst leading his column: still, their success was complete j five hundred and forty-three prisoners, fifteen pieces of cannon, the stan- dards, and a large amount of mihtary stores, fell into the hands of the conquerors. This action was considered one of the most brilliant achievements of the war ; it merited high encomiums for Waynci and his troops, and Congress ordered a gold medal to be struck in honor of the victory. Not long before this event, and towards the close of the year 1777, the previous losses of the Americans in the north were mopt advan- tageously repaired. General Burgoyne had undertaken to efiect a junction of the British troops from Canada with those stationed at New York, for the purpose of cutting off all communication between the northern and southern States. His march from Q^uebec and upon the American territory was at first successful and rapid, though it cost him much labor to make the roads passable. The fierce bat- ■ ties of Bennington and Stillwater checked this triumphant course, and he was still far from having accomplished his project, when de- sertions and scarcity of provisions increased his embarrassment. A speedy retreat towards the north might perhaps have delivered him from his perilous position; but this last resource was also rendered impossible by the skilful efforts of General Gates to surround him. Burgoyne, thus deprived of all means of escape, opened at Saratoga a negotiation with the American general, and on tlie seventeenth of October surrendered the remnant of his troops, now reduced from twelve to six thousand, with the whole train of artillery and an im« mense quantity of military stores. The capture of Burgoyne's army was, especially in a moral point A. D. 1776 — 1783.] WAR OF INDEPENDENCE. 441 of view and as an encouragement, of vital importance to the Ameri- cans. Still, much remained to be done and suffered, before the war could be brought to a close. The chief theatre of hostilities was now transferred, as it were by common consent of the hostile parties, from the northern to the southern States. Here the cause of liberty seemed totally lost for a long time. The capture of Savannah, and the sub- sequent conquest of Georgia by the British in 1779; afterwards, their success in subduing Charleston and South Carolina, with a conside- rable loss of men and artillery on the part of the Americans, in 1780; finally, the signal defeat of General Gates by Lord Cornwallis at Camden, opening a free road to the invasion of North Carolina and Virginia: such was, in the beginning of 1781, the discouraging and almost desperate situation of affairs throughout that extensive part of the American territory. In this extremity, the command of the republican forces just happened to devolve on two men endowed with that courage, activity and perseverance which the emergency re- quired; men of pecuhar and fertile genius, who stimulated the spirits of the patriots, roused them to fresh exertions, and, by a series of gallant actions, not only checked the victorious career of the enemy, but even prepared the way for tlie final triumph of American Inde- pendence. The first of these prominent personages was General Greene, justly eurnamed, for hi§ brilliant achievements, the liberator of the South. Being appointed to succeed Gates after the defeat of Camden, he entered the stale of South Carolina with a dispirited and almost destitute army, and found the country in the possession of a mighty foe, intrenched in a long chain of well garrisoned and fortified posts. Ke successively broke through and captured them, and although several times defeated in the open field, he found so many resources in the energy of his character and the fertility of his genius, that he was always formidable; nor did he cease to harass his oppo- nents, until he had driven them from their different posts throughout the State into the fortifications of the capital. The victory of General Morgan at Cowpens opened, and the battle of Eutaw Springs won by Greene in person, closed this decisive campaign.* Nearly the same success was obtained in Virginia by Lafayette, who, with only three or four thousand men, many of whom were * As well in this as in other periods and theatres of the war, the officers and soldiers of the Maryland regiment highly distinguished themselves by their intrepid and gallant behavior. None fought more resolutely in tho disastrous battles of Long Island and Camden ; and, could victory have been won, their courage would have achieved it on both occasions. See Mar- fihall, Life of Washington, vol. t, ^lp. 346 — 347; — Wilson, History of tha American Revohdion, pp. 160 and 306 ; — Frost, History of the United St Precisely at this time, northern and central Europe, uniting in one general league against Bonaparte, for ever shook off the yoke of his ambition. A little before, in 1812, having declared a new war against the Russians, under the plea that they favored British commerce, he marched into their country with an army of nearly five hundred thousand men, French and allies, perfectly equipped and well disciplined. In the presence of such a host, the most for- midable, it may be said, that the world ever beheld, the enemy, far inferior in numbers, wisely adopted the plan of acting in the defen- sive, and making a stand only in favorable positions. In its retreat, the Russian army laid waste all the country through which the invaders had to pass, and burnt the towns in which they might have found a shelter. Even Moscow, the ancient capital of Russia, which the French at last reached after the bloody victories of Smolensk and Moscowa, was nobly sacrificed to save the empire; during the very first night after their arrival, the city was simultaneously fired in several parts, and in a short time reduced to a heap of ruins. Thus deprived of winter quarters and of necessary provisions, m the midst of an exasperated enemy who had now collected his forces. Napoleon, after in vain offering peace to the emperor Alexander, commenced a retreat on the nineteenth of October. He had not pro- ceeded far, when famine began to rage among his wearied troops ; the Russian army, hovering around them, incessantly harassed and obstructed their march, especially at the crossing of rivers; winter set in with unusual rigor; and the mortality arising from these various causes became so dreadful, that, when the campaign closed (on the thirteenth of December), it was found that upwards of two hundred and fifty thousand men had perished, besides nearly two hundred thousand made prisoners. Thus ended the memorable Russian expedition, the first of Napo- leon's undertakings in which he was completely defeated, and one too the further consequences of which were for him of the most disastrous character. Prussia and Sweden now joined the Russians against the French emperor, and Austria with Bavaria soon imitated their exam- 460 MODEEN HISTORY. [PART 8. pie. Bonaparte, however, was not yet disposed to descend from his high pretensions, and having, by astonishing exertions, recruited hia army to the amount of about two hundred and eighty thousand men, he fearlessly encountered his still more numerous foes in the evectful campaign of Saxony (a. d. 1813). Such was even now the display of his mihtary abilities and the courage of his troops, that he routed the allies at Lutzen, Bautzen and Dresden with great slaughter, yet without any permanent advantage. Their numbers always appeared the same, and seemed rather to be daily increasing. They attacked him again under the walls of Leipsic with three hundred thousand troops and nine hundred field pieces, whilst he could not concentrate on that point more than one hundred and seventy thousand men with seven hundred pieces of artillery. The conflict was one of the most awful during that tremendous war, and such as language cannot describe. During three days, the French maintained their position with undaunted courage, having, it is said, shot from their cannons the enormous number of two hundred and fifty thousand balls ; but, on the third day, being abandoned by the Saxons their alhes, and overpowered by numbers, they were finally compelled to quit the field, with the dreadful loss of forty thousand men, besides a vast multitude of prisoners taken during the pursuit. Still, the van- quished preserved their usual intrepidity, which they displayed at Hanau, by defeating the Bavarians who had presumed to intercept their retreat. A free passage was thus opened for them to the French frontier; but their conquests in Germany were lost for ever. Napoleon was now deserted by all his allies, and obliged to with stand alone the efforts of the European league formed against him. The beginning of the year 1814 beheld half a million of men, Aus- trians, Russians, Prussians, etc., under their respective sovereigns, rush from all directions upon the French territory. They had pre- viously issued a manifesto declaring their intention both to maintain France in all her rights as a nation, and to crush the mihtary system of her ambitious ruler; a two-fold object which their moderation and their decisive measures soon enabled them to attain. It was to no efiect that Napoleon, by new prodigies of activity and courage, de- feated the allies at Brienne, Montereau, Champaubert and Montmi- rail. Having made a better disposition of their forces, they at length moved towards Paris, and arrived near that capital before the French emperor, who was engaged elsewhere, could come to its relief. After a vigorous, though short and hopeless resistance from the heights of Montmartre, terms of capitulation were signed ; and, on the thirty-first of March, the allied sovereigns, with fifty thousand chosen troops, made their solemn entry into Paris, amidst the general and contmued plaudits of the inhabitants, who received them more A. D. 1805 — 1815.] NAPOLEON, EMPEROE. 461 as deliverers than as conquerors. A provisional government was formed, and a decree passed by the Senate, declaring that Napoleon Bonaparte had forfeited the throne. It was also decided tiiat the Bour- bon dynasty should be restored, France, in the mean while, being allowed by the generosity of the allies not only to retain her ancient limits, but even to receive some augmentation of territory and recover her colonies. As to the fallen emperor, the island of Elba, in the Mediterranean, was allotted to be possessed by him in full sovereignty, with an annual revenue of six millions of francs. The allied monarchs soon left Paris, where Louis XVIII, the brother of Louis XVI, arrived on the third of May, 1814, to take possession of his throne. The pope, after five years captivity, had returned to Rome ; Bonaparte had also departed for his new residence ; and Europe, after so many and so dreadful agitations, began to enjoy a long desired and much needed repose, when the storm again burst upon it with renewed fury. The unexpected news arrived, that the dethroned emperor had escaped from his island and landed on the shores of Provence with an escort of nine hundred men. In fact, he was already on his way to Paris; the troops joined him from all quarters, and, on the twentieth of March, 1815, he triumphantly en- tered the capital, which Louis XVIII had left but a few hours before, in order to reach the northern frontier. The account of Napoleon's return quickly reached the ears of the great European potentates, then assembled at Vienna for the purpose of settling upon a sure basis the affairs of the continent. Surprised and afflicted, but not dismayed, they declared that the ex-emperor of the French, by breaking the last treaty, '*had placed himself without the pale of civil and social relations," and pledged ihemselves not to lay down their arms until he should be deprived of the powei of ever again disturbing the tranquillity of the world. Bonaparte, on his side, was not idle in making adequate preparations for the ap- proaching conflict. Having reorganized his army, he rapidly ad vanced towards the Belgian frontier, in order to attack the English under Wellington, and the Prussians under B.lucher, before they could be joined by the Austriaps and the Russians. His first opera- tions were prosperous, the allies being obliged to make a retrograde movement, and the Prussians in particular having suffered a severe check in the batde of Ligny. He now directed his main efforts against the English, who had just taken a formidable position near Waterloo; and, on the eighteenth of June of the same year, 1815, was fought the decisive batde on which the peace of Europe and his own fate depended. The two armies, under the command of such wonderful men as Napoleon and Wellington, presented the most imposing and terrific 39* 462 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 8, appearance: ttiey were nearly equal as well in discipline, valor and fierce national animosity, as in numbers, which amounted to about seventy-five thousand men on each side. How dreadful must have been the conflict between troops of this character, every one may easily conceive. It commenced about noon with a tremendous can- nonade, and was continued many hours whh almost frantic fury, the French infantry and cavalry making incessant and desperate charges, which were all met with dauntless courage. Towards seven o'clock in the evening, Bonaparte determined to carry his point by redoubled efforts, ordered, in person, a new powerful attack upon the Brhish line; his celebrated guard resolutely advanced in the form of a double column, but was received with so galling a fire from the enemy's artillery and musketry as to be soon compelled to give way, and had now to sustain in their turn a similar charge from the English. Just at this decisive moment, the Prussians, having by a skilful march deceived Grouchy, who was opposed to them, joined their allies, and opened a heavy cannonade on the right wing and rear of the French. It was a moment of irretrievable confusion : those brave columns of Napoleon, just before so formidable, now broken and unable to rally, at last fled from that scene of carnage where they left twenty thousand slain, and, being closely pursued by the Prussians, dispersed in every direction. Truly awful was the loss of the English also in this ever memorable battle, since il amounted to six hundred officers, eleven generals, and fifteen thou- sand men killed and wounded. Still, the victory of the allies was complete; the whole ardllery of the vanquished army, consisting of three hundred guns, fell into their hands, and the power of Bonaparte was now prostrated, to rise no more. Wellington, not being opposed in his march, soon appeared with his victorious troops in sight of Paris. That capital was again en- tered and occupied for a time by the confederates; while the remains of the imperial army were obliged to retreat beyond the river Loire. The Bourbons once more recovered their vacillating throne; but France was not so advantageously treated by the allied monarchs as she had been at the time of the first invasion : besides a variety of severe or humiliating measures to which she had to submit, she was con- demned to pay about seven hundred and fifty millions of francs as an indemnification for the expenses of the war. In the mean time, Bonaparte, who had already left Paris, with- drew to Rochefort3 a sea-port on the western coast of France, in hopes of being able to effect his passage to America. That port was, however, too closely blockaded by English cruisers, to permit any escape; the emperor, seeing all his attempts to effect his purpose in- effectual, resolved at length to throw himself on the protection of the A. D. 1812 — 1815.] SECOND AMERICAN WAR. 463 British government, and went on board their ship of the line, the Bellerophon, stationed at a short distance from the shore. It was immediately determined to send him to St. Helena, a remote island m the middle of the Atlantic, as a place where he could be kept in perfect security, without too much confinement or restraint. Here, in the society of a few devoted friends who had chosen to accompany him to the place of his exile, he lived about six years, spending much time and labor in dictating memoirs of his own life. The assistance of a priest and the succors of religion, which he had earnestly begged, consoled his last moments; and the fifth of May, 1821, closed the earthly career of that extraordinary man before whom Europe hadi so long trembled, and who, notwuhstanding the sad reverses whichj clo^aded the evening of his life, is justly considered the most power- ful genius and the greatest captain of the age. SECOND AMERICAN WAR.— a. d. 1812— 1S15. England was not yet disengaged from her perilous and gigantic struggle against the emperor of the French, when, by a series of at- tempts on the liberties of maritime commerce, she again provoked ihe hostility of the Americans. This may be called a political fauh so much the greater, as the United States had, during the last years, rapidly increased in population, wealth and power, both from the in- dustry of their inhabitants, the tide of emigration, and the accession of many new states, Louisiana, Kentucky, Ohio, etc., to their con- federacy. New causes of provocation continuing to take place be- tween the ships of the two nations, and the majority of the American people being desirous of war for the redress of their grievances, Con gress openly declared it on the eighteenth of June, (a. d. 1812), Its commencement was very unfavorable to the arms of the United States, as all attempts then made at the northern frontier to invade Canada were not only fruitless, but also attended with a considera- ble loss of men and ammunhion. However, the spirit of the people was not subdued, nor the army disheartened, and before the close of the year 1813, they began to reap the fruit of their perseverance by capturing, under the direction of Commodore Perry, the whole Bri- tish fleet on lake Erie, and gaining, under General Harrison, the victory of the Thames, which recovered the posts previously surren- dered to the enemy. Another victory on land near the cataract of Niagara, and the destruction of another British flotilla on lake Cham- plain, gave the Americans a decided superiority in those qunrters, at Jeast with regard to the defence and protection of their own territory. 464 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 8. Their warlike exertions upon the ocean were also generally fortu- nate j so much so, that almost every week brought the tidings of some brilliant capture made, or some splendid exploit achieved by the spirit and intrepidity of American seamen; but success upon the land was more equally divided. Five or six thousand troops under General Ross, having reached the vicinity of Washington, routed the Ameri- can force, amounting to seven or eight thousand men, including militia. The city was abandoned by the president and the heads of departments, and soon after entered by the conquerors, who did not, however, occupy it more than one day. Elated whh success, they resolved to undertake also the capture of Baltimore, intending to make this important place their winter quarters. Their landing at North Point, on the eleventh of September, 1814, met with little or no opposition; but their general Ross being killed, on the twelfth, in his advance towards the city, and all the attacks made by his vessels and troops on Fort McHenry being bravely repulsed, they were com- pelled to abandon the enterprise. The English turned now their main efforts against the southern States. New Orleans being the principal object of their views, a powerful armament was fitted out for an attack on this opulent city. Fortunately, an able and experienced commander, one already dis- tinguished for his feats of arms in other parts of the Union, General Jackson, was there to oppose the progress of the enemy. Besides his regular troops and the militia of the neighboring States, he re- quired of every citizen who could bear arms, to take an active part in the military operations on which the safety of all depended. The fortifications were strengthened; an extensive line of works was erected four miles below the town, well furnished with artillery ; and, the better to protect his troops from the fire of the assailants, Jackson conceived the happy idea of covering the intrenchments with a great number of cotton bales. In this favorable position, he resolutely de- fied every attack of the enemy. Towards the last days of December, of the year 1814, the English, under the cover of their batteries, made several attempts to carry by storm the fortifications before them; but they were invariably re- pulsed by the superior fire of the American artillery. The final attack on the main works, was reserved for the eighth of January following. It lasted about one hour and a half, during which the valor of the assailants only served to expose them without adequate defence to the incessant and destructive fire from the cannons and musketry of the besieged; while the breast- works of cotton-bales, which no ball could penetrate, afforded complete protection to their opponents. The British were obliged to retire from the sanguinary conflict with the loss of two thousand six hundred men, wounded, captured or slain, A. D. 1815—1844.] VIEW OF CIVILIZED WORLD. 465 including their general Packenham and their chief officers; whilst the victorious Americans had not lost, in this decisive action, more than six killed and seven wounded. The news of this important victory filled the whole country with exultation, and was the closing event of the second American war. Shortly after, intelligence was received from Europe of the peace concluded by the American and English commissioners assembled at Ghent for that purpose. The treaty, already signed by the court of England, was ratified by the President and Senate of the United States in February (a. d. 1815); and thus, in the same year, with the interval of a i'ew months, peace was reestablished in America by the treaty of Ghent, and in Europe by the second fall of Bonaparte. VIEW OF THE CIVILIZED WORLD. A. D. 1815—1844. After the eventful period of the battles of New Orleans and Water- loo, most of the civilized nations of the world remained for a consider- able time in a state of comparative tranquillity. Fortunately for the rising generation, neither sovereigns nor their subjects seemed inclined to indulge any longer that fatal ardor for military glory, Avhich charac- terized the preceding epochs. The leading powers, whether in Ame- rica or Europe, appeared generally desirous to enjoy in repose the laurels which their respective countries had formerly won in the field, and to contend for the palm of national preeminence only by the arts of peaceful and prosperous industry. To Great Britain, above all belonged the honor of arresting the course of the French revolutionary armies and of Napoleon's ambi- tious career. Notwithstanding the heavy taxes laid on her citizens, and the prodigious amount of her national debt, raised already to about four billions of dollars, she seemed to have attained the height of power and political infiuence, chiefly by the superiority of her naval force. In 1827, the world beheld her successful exertions in protect- ing the independence of Greece against the Turks, and afterwards the Turks themselves ajjainst the encroachments of the new Egyptian dynasty; defending her immense possessions in the East and West; chastising the pirates of the Mediterranean ; attacking (ho Chinese, and compelling them to conclude a disadvantageous peace, etc. Among the transactions of her civil government in the same period, the most remarkable was the act of emancipation from civil disabilities and persecuting laws, granted to her Calholic sul)jects in 1829, an exam- ple of moderation and justice, too long withheld and yet highly worthy 4:QQ MODERN HISTORY. [PART 8. of imitation, but which, it seems, was little valued and still less fol- lowed by the King of Prussia, Frederick Wilham III_, and especially by the Russian autocrat Nicholas.* Like Great Britain, France continued, after so many agitations and storms, to occupy that high national rank which her advaniageous position, her vast resources of soil and industry, and the lofty spirit of her people entitled her to hold among the European powers. Neither the clashing of parties, nor the substitution of the Orleans in the place of the Bourbon dynasty, prevented her from securing additional lustre to the glory of her arms. Not only did she amply share with Eng- land and Russia in the victory gained at Navarino over the Turks; but the successful expedition of Spain under Louis XVIII, the still more brilliant conquest of Algiers under Charles X, the siege of Antwerp and the capture of Vera Cruz under Louis Philip, again showed to the world, what, even after the disasters of Napoleon's last campaigns, could be effected by French valor, skill and disci- pline. Notwithstanding a thousand difficulties, Louis Philip held the reins of government with such firmness and prudence as to attract the admiration even of his enemies. Yet, all his talents and skill were not able to reconcile together the different political parties into which the French people were divided, nor save his own govern- ment from a strong opposition that threatened a new revolution in France. Austria, Russia and Prussia, which formerly suff"ered most from the wars of Bonaparte, not only repaired their losses, but even acquired in the final settlement of their claims, a greater extent of territory. Among the chief European States, Spain was the most unfortunate." In consequence of the impolitic measures of King Ferdinand VII, and a variety of other causes, factions and civil wars continued almost without interruption, up to the downfall of the tyrannical regent Espar- tero (1843), to desolate that noble country, the land of chivalry and heroism, formerly so much celebrated for her national and political strength, and so long placed at the head of European civilization. Nor was this deplorable train of internal evils the only misfortune that befel the Spaniards. All their ancient dominions in the New World, except Cuba and Porto Rico, successively threw off their allegiance to the mother country, and formed themselves into inde- pendent governments, viz: Buenos Ayres, in 1816; Chili, 1818; Peru and Bolivia, 1821-1824; Columbia, towards 1820, divided into three separate States in 1831; Guatemala and Mexico, 1820-1824. All these regions became so many Confederacies or Republics, from which others have sprung up since; but none of Them assumed any flourishing and powerful aspect, approaching in ihe least to that of the United North American States. Here, notwithstanding some embarrassments which occasionally took place in the finances, the country had constantly advanced in ■* See note P. A. D. 1845 — 1848.] MEXICAN WAR, ETC. 467 population and importance. The number of its inhabitants, owing to the incessant influx of emigrants from Europe, had become, by 1844, five times greater than it was sixty years before, at the close of the war of independence. Thirteen new States had been added to the thirteen which primitively composed the Union, whilst their neigh- bors, the Texans, had just made known the desire of being also received into the Confederacy. Besides, the prosperous condition of agriculture and manufactures; the steady development of foreign commerce and inland trade, together with the extent and resources of tne land, the wisdom hitherto displayed by its chief rulers, and the active, industrious and enterprising spirit of the people, left, even at that epoch, but little room to doubt that the United States were des- tined to possess a considerable share of influence in the future desti- nies of the civilized world. ANNEXATION OF TEXAS.— MEXICAN WAR AND ITS CONSEQUENCES.— A. d. 1845—1848. The proposed annexation of Texas to the United Slates had, for several years, met with little encouragement on the part of the cabi- net at Washington. The scheme, however, began to be actively pursued during the latter part of Mr. Tyler's presidency ; yet, on account of new difficulties, it was not carried into effect till 1845, the first year of President Polk's administration. During the course of that year, the terms of annexation were settled by both parties, and Texas was declared a State of the American Union. In virtue of this agreement, the Texans immediately requested Mr. Polk to occupy the principal stations of their country, and to send an army for its defence. This momentous transaction, irrevocably depriving the Mexicans of a vast territory, was not concluded without loud protests on their part; they naturally complained of it, through their ministers and ambassadors, as an infringement of their rights. They appealed to the treaty of friendship existing between the two nations, and openly denounced the annexation of Texas, and its occupation by an Ameri- can force as a violation of that treaty. So strong, indeed, was this feeling among them, that their executive, under President Herrera, having betrayed a disposition to settle their differences with the Ame- rican government in a peaceful manner, were suddenly overthrown, to make room for the presidency of General Paredes. Troops were assembled and stationed at the frontier, to the number of about eight thousand, under the command of General Arista. The Americans, on their side, had taken a similar step, and their troops had already advanced to occupy the disputed territory. The 468 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 8. first action that too,"k place between the hostile parties, ^ as a private encounter, in which the Americans lost sixty-three dragoons, killed, wounded, or prisoners. A few days later, a body of Texans was also surprised in their camp, and several were slain or wounded These beginnings seemed very inauspicious to the American cause ; but things wore a quite different aspect when General Taylor, being anpointed commander-in-chief for that distant theatre of the war, appeared in person on the field, and was enabled to fight regulai battles. This able leader having, after his arrival in the Texan territory, been stationed successively in various places, finally took up his position near the Rio Grande (also called Eio Bravo del Norte), within cannon-shot of the city of Matamoras. He had not however completed his intrenchments, when he was informed that Point Isabel, where he had left a large supply of provisions and ammuni- tion, was seriously threatened by the Mexicans. With the main part of his army, he quickly retraced his steps towards that import- ant point, to prevent it from falling, into the hands of the enemy. Having attained his object, and garrisoned the place with new troops, he again set out for Matamoras, and, on the second day of his march (8th of May, 1846), discovered near Palo Alto the Mexi- can forces drawn up in battle-array, and waiting for his approach. Although his force did not exceed two thousand three hundred men, whilst that of the Mexicans amounted, it is believed, to nearly seven thousand, he did not decline the combat. On the side of the Americans, it was carried on chiefly by artillery, and such was the superiority of their fire that, after an action of about five hours, the enemy's columns were disordered and driven back from their posi- tion."^ General Arista retreated during the night, and occupied a new and favorable position at Resaca de la Palma, a few miles distant from Palo Alto. On the following day, as the two hostile armies met again, another engagement immediately ensued. The Mexican artillery commenced the action, and was so well managed that its effects were quite severe on the American lines. It became necessary to dislodge the enemy from the ground which they occupied ; this was done by a succession of skilful movements and vigorous charges. Their artillery were dispersed; La Vega, one of their best generals, was made prisoner ; and their columns, now broken on all sides, were no longer able to bear the well- directed fire continually poured upon them by the American mus- ketry and artillery. They fled from the field with great precipitation, and being warmly pursued, continued their flight till they placed the Rio Grande between themselves and their conquerors. No cov.'ardice, however, no feebleness should be imputed to them. They had behaved and fought well, and they were defeated only because, in the natural course of events, mere courage must yield to at least equal valor aided by superior bodily strength, military skill, science and discipline. "In these engagements," says a well-informed historian, "the ^^ Report of General Tmjlor, dated May 9th, IS-iO. A. D, 1845 — 1848. MEXICAN WAE, ETC. . 469 commander of the American forces, General Zachary Taylor, dis- played the utmost coolness and bravery — exposing himself in the most dangerous positions, and encouraging his troops by his heroic example. After the battles were ended, his attention to the wounded and the dying, whether friend or foe, evinced that sympathy for suffering humanity, which is ever inseparable from true courage."* To this merited praise, we must add that General Taylor, in his reports of the campaign, evinced not less modesty in speaking of himself, than sincerity in extolling the bravery of his officers and soldiers. During these operations of the main body of the army, a de- tachment previously left for the defence of the field-work opposite to Matamoras, equally signalized themselves by their gallant beha- vior. They lost, it is true, their intrepid commander. Major Brown ; yet they successfully sustained a severe cannonade and bombardment which continued one hundred and sixty-eight hours, till at length the fort was relieved, and the siege raised, by the arrival of Taylor's army immediately after the victories of Palo Alto and Resaca de la Palma. So much success obtained within so short a time -inspired the Americans not only with great joy and confidence, but also with a violent thirst for new conquests. No longer satisfied with the pos session of Texas, they now prepared to penetrate into the heart of the Mexican territory, particularly as valuable reinforcements had been received, and the effective troops, independently of garrisons left in some places, amounted to nearly seven thousand men, full of hope and courage. They, therefore, were made to advance in three divisions towards the south, and on the 19th of September, they arrived in sight of Monterey (the capital of New Leon), having met during their march no« resistance except from skirmishing parties of Mexican cavalry. Monterey is described by historians as an important place, well fortified both by nature and art. The garrison, under the command of Pedro Ampudia, consisted, it is said, of about seven thousand regular troops, and two or three thousand irregulars, being con- sequently more numerous than the whole besieging army. Not- withstanding these weighty obstacles. General Taylor thought it possible to carry the city by storm, with the artillery and the bayonet. His hopes were realized. The attack began on the 20th of September, and notwithstanding all the difficulties of a fearful struggle, was renewed during three successive days. The besiegers were occasionally repulsed on some points ; yet many of their corps gained ground, till at length, by dint of efforts and courage, they succeeded not only in carrying the out- ward posts and fortifications, but even in occupying several parts of the city. As the Mexicans, however, had offered a brave resistance, and llieir artillery in particular had played with terrible effect on the Americans, the final success of the latter was not obtained without •■■Mansfjeldj Mexican War, ch. ii. pp, 3S, 39. 40 470 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 8 considerable loss. The attack of the citadel, if attempted, tiireatened to cost them the lives of many other brave soldiers. This conside- ration, added to other cogent reasons, induced the commander-in- chief to lend a willing ear to the proposals made, on the 24th of September, by General Ampudia. This officer oflered to surrender both the remainder of the town and the citadel, on condition of a favorable and honorable capitulation; the desired terms wcio granted, and the Mexican troops withdrew from the place with al] the honors of war. The surrender of Monterey opened a large field to the enterpris- ing spirit of the Americans ; within the space of only three months after that event, they subdued a vast extent of country, and occupied the important places of Saltillo, Tampico, and Victoria. Nor was the work of conquest carried on merely in this portion of the Mexican republic. Other expeditions had, in the interim, been set on foot by the cabinet at Washington, for the purpose of detaching from the central government of Mexico its northern and north-western pro- vinces. These expeditions were placed under the command of General Wool, on the one hand, and, on the other, of General Kear- ny, assisted by the intrepid Colonel Doniphan. They did not, at the time, procure any material advantage, yet tliey also contributed to show forth the extent of American energy and valor, and subdued a very considerable, though almost uninhabited, territory. About the same time, and even before the events just related, similar exploits took place in California. These were achieved by Captain Fremont, an officer equally distinguished for bold enterprise and scientific attainments. With less than two hundred riflemen, he defeated and drove before him all the Mexican parties on his way, and being reinforced by Commodore Stockton, entered the Californian capital in the month of August, 1846. Thus was com- pleted in a short campaign, and almost without bloodshed, the con- quest of California. However surprising these exploits, still greater and more impor- tant achievements continued to be performed by General Taylor. He was now far advanced in his march across the Mexican terri- tory, when he received information of the approach of a hostile force, amounting to at least twenty thousand men. To this great number the American general could hardly oppose five thousand soldiers, as his army had been reduced by the necessity in which he was of sending a very considerable portion of his forces to fight under General Scott, in another seat of the war ; but, as a sort of compensation for this great disparity, he possessed brave and skilful officers, an excellent artillery, and a formidable position, purposely BQlected by himself, on the heights of Buena Vista, The two armies were in sight of each other on the 22d of Feb- ruary, 1847. The celebrated leader, Santa Anna, then at the head of the Mexican forces, was so confident of victory, that, before com- mencing the attack, ho sent a message to' General Taylor, summoning him to surrender at discretion. Of course no satisfactory answer was returned, and the conflict began on the same day, too late however in A. D 1845 — 1848 MEXICAN WAR, ETC. 471 the evening, to produce any serious effect; the decisive action was reserved for the' following day, the 23d, a day for ever memorable in the annals of American warfare. The battle lasted from seven in the morning to six in the evening, a circumstance which alone might suffice to show how warmly it was contested. At two different parts of the day, the Mexicans, by their superior numbers, their bravery, and the judicious plan of their commander-in-chief, obtained a considerable, although only partial and transient advantage. Marching on to the attack with determined vigor, they for a time outflanked the left and even the rear of their opponents, forced some regiments to fall back with great loss and disorder, and, occupying their position, placed the whole American army in imminent peril. But on the other hand, the heroic calmness of General Taylor, the precision of his orders, their prompt execution, the steady fire of his artillery, which pro- duced dreadful havoc among the dense masses of the assailants, and the stern intrepidity of a large number of his troops, at length won the day, and enabled him to remain in possession of the field.* The Mexicans, thus foiled in their attempt to carry the American position, retreated during the night, having lost even according to Santa Anna's account, more than fifteen hundred men killed and wounded, whilst the remainder, exposed to painful privations and given up to despondency, scattered themselves in different directions, either following their officers, or altogether abandoning their stand- ards. Hence the issue of the battle of Buena Yista was of immense advantage to the Americans ; it left them absolute masters of the field, secured for them the frontier of the Rio Grande, and whilst it crowned their exploits on that side, spread terror and dismay through the Mexican nation. The chief operations of war by orders from the American govern- ment, were now to be carried on in another part of the country. About this time. General Scott, who had hitherto been actively en- gaged in making the necessary arrangements for the troops, arrived from Washington to take in person a still more active share in the prosecution of hostilities. He was not to supersede General Taylor in his particular plan of operations ; yet, he had been appointed to act as commander-in-chief, and to have the conduct of the main expedition against Mexico. General Scott reached by sea the frontiers of the Mexican repub- * The Mexican general, in his report of the battle of Buena Vista, repeat- edly intimates that victory had been on his side ; but these expressions cannot be understood to mean any thing else than the momentary successes which lie obtained at different parts of the day. From his own account, the ultimate result was certainly against him. Independently of the disappointment and discontent which characterize his letter, and bespeak the vanquishea ratner than the victorious general, Santa Anna candially admits, 1st, that he could not, as ho inten(ied, dtive the Americans from their last mtrenchment, and li\, that no later than the ensuing night, he was compelled by circumstances to witiid.aw frum llie field of battle. Does not this amount to an implicit acknowledgement of failure on his part, and ultimate succe.s9 to the Amen- cans ? 472 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 8. lie. Having collected twelve thousand men, and being provided with every thinn; necessary for a siege, he landed them without any loss, at a short distance from Vera Cruz. The bombardment of this city began on the 22d of March, 1847, and was continued during four days in succession, with awful activity and terrible effect. All that time, the defence of the Mexicans was spirited and obstinate; but after the 26th, at the sight of the immense havoc that had been already produced among their people, they at length, in order to avoid entire destruction, resolved to surrender. Two days later, the articles of capitulation were signed. Full protection was secured to the inhabitants ; the honors of war were granted to the garrison : the Mexican troops, under these terms, evacuated the place, and the American flag waved over the city of Vera Cruz and its renowned fortress, the Castle of San Juan d'Ulloa. As soon as the necessary preparation could be made, the victori- ous army advanced into the Mexican territory, in the direction of Jalapa ; but, before ,they reached this place, a new and formidable obstacle presented itself. It was necessary to cross a ridge of high mountains, and the almost impregnable heights of Cerro Gordo, fortified both by nature and art. Here again stood Santa Anna, ready to oppose their passage. After his repulse at Buena Vista, this general had rapidly traversed the central provinces with a con- siderable portion of his troops, and now, at the head of fifteen thousand men, sought to defend a position naturally so strong, with batteries and intrenchments. It seemed rashness to assault a position of this kind; yet so urgent was the necessity of an attempt, and so great the confidence of General Scott in the valor of his troops, that the attack was resolved upon for the 18th of April. The orders to the several bodies of the army, and the indications of their intended move- ments, were given with almost prophetic exactness ; and the execu- tion on the part of the officers and soldiers was equally admirable. Those in front were, it is true, compelled, after bravely fighting, to withdraw before the Mexican batteries ; yet their gallant effort was not altogether lost, as it occupied the enemy's attention on that side. Those in flank, although likewise exposed to a murderous fire of artillery and musketry, ascended the long and difficult slope of Cerro Gordo with the utmost steadiness, reached the breastworks of that fortress, drove the Mexicans from them, planted their colors, and after some minutes more of sharp firing, finished the conquest with the bayonet. This memorable action cost the Americans about two hundred and fifty men killed or wounded, among whom were several officers of distinction. In return for this loss, they had obtained a com- plete triumph ; and so great a quantity of large guns, stands of arms and ammunition, fell into their hands, that they were really embarrassed with the results of victory. The Mexicans, besides, had a great number of slain and .wounded, independently of three thousand men that were made prisoners, together with five of their generals. The rest of their troops, eight thousand in number, A. D. 1845 — 1848. MEXICAN WAR, ETC. ' 4Y3 always under the command of Santa Anna, fled with precipitation from the scene of havoc, in the direction of Jalapa. The principal effect of the battle and capture of Cerro Gordo, very similar to that which followed the capture of Monterey, was to open for the Americans a free road towards the Mexican capital, 'i'hey for some weeks advanced into the country with little or no opposition, taking possession, as they went on, of all the castles and towns in their way, among others of the ancient and populous city of Puebia, situated nearly midway between Yera Cruz and Mexico. That city was entered towards the middle of May, 1847, by the first division of the army under General Worth — a brave and skilful officer, who, after having greatly distinguished himself under General Taylor, continued to render signal services under General Scott. Thus, within the short space of two months, the city of Vera Cruz had been compelled to surrender; the famed castle of San Juan d'Ulloa was also taken; the almost impregnable tower of Cerro Gordo was carried by storm ; the town of Jalapa entered; the strong fortress of Perote captured, and Puebia occupied. Ten thousand Mexicans made prisoners of war, and a vast amount of ammunition, splendid cannon and stand of arms, were the spoils of the victories won by the American troops in a campaign of only eight or nine weeks. History presents but few instances of achieve- ments at the same time so brilliant and so rapid. But the American army itself had undergone severe losses, and its numbers were greatly reduced, not only by death on the field of battle, but also by fatigue, disease, or desertion, and by the depar- ture of several corps, after one year of service. This obliged General Scott to reside for some months in the city of Puebia, in expectation of new reinforcements. "When these arrived, and his army was again placed on a respectable footing, he resumed his march towards Mexico ; on the 18th of August, his forces, amount- ing to about ten thousand men, were concentrated near San Augu» tine, nine miles south of that capital. On the 20th of August, the Americans attacked all the fortified posts occupied by the enemy in their neighborhood, and notwith- standing the intrenchments, and the numerical superiority of the Mexicans, carried them all with the sword and the bayonet. The well-contested battle of Churubusco, fought in the evening of the same memorable day, completed the success of the previous partial actions. It lasted three hours, with terril^le and incessant dis- charges of musketry and artillery from both sides. At last the Americans conquered, and the Mexicans were defeated in every part of the field, with the loss of several thousand men killed, wounded, or prisoners. To prevent farther efi'usion of blood, a temporary negotiation was opened ; but as this also failed. General Scott thought it his duty to recommence hostilities as soon as the truce expired. Nevertheless, the bloody scenes of war were now drawing to a close. In spite of new dangers, occasioned both by the nature of the ground and 40* 474 MODERN HISTORY. fPART 8. by various fortifications in the neighborhood and at the entrance of Mexico, the American troops made their advance with but little interruption. This indeed required of them many strenuous efforts, and cost the lives of many brave officers and soldiers, especially in the storming of the formidable defences of Chapultepec, Molino del Rey and Casa de Mata; yet every obstacle yielded to their un- daunted energy, and a series of well-directed and successful attacks, during the space of forty-eight hours, at last made them masters of the great Mexican capital (September, 1847*).^ The Mexicans had, up to this moment, entertained the hope of driving the American forces from their territory. This hope must now have vanished before the stern evidence of facts. The federal government and General Santa Anna fled; a deputation of the city council was sent to the American leader, and negotiations were organized to treat of peace. The terms, being settled between the commissioners of each party, were forwarded to the government at Washington, and here they underwent some alterations and amend- ments, to which the Mexican congress acceded without much diffi- culty. After the ratification had taken place on their part, "the American commissioners officially informed the secretary of state that the treaty was complete, and on the 19 th of June, 1848, two years and two months from the commencement of the war, the American people were formally notified that there was peace be^ tween Mexico and the United States.^f The war had cost the lives of nearly twenty thousand Ameri- . cans, who either fell in battle, or died of excessive fatigue, disease, and other accidents ; whilst the pecuniary expenses amounted to upwards of one hundred and fifty millions of dollars ; to which must be added the sum of fifteen millions of dollars to be paid to the Mexican republic, as an indemnifi.cation for their cession and loss of several extensive provinces. It is true that a vast territory had thus been acquired to the United States, and it cannot be denied that a surfaee of six hundred and thirty thousand square miles, including Upper California and New Mexico, was a valuable acquisition ; yet as the greater part of this immense tract of country was dreary or actually uninhabited, it could scarcely have been considered a suffi- cient compensation lor the vast expenditure of money and life, had it not been for the paramount advantages that were to arise from it, with regard to commerce and civilization. One great movement immediately took place in reference to these newly acquired posses- sions. Multitudes of emigrants hurried towards the shores of the Pacific, for the purpose of working the golden mines of Upper Cahfor- nia. Settlements were made, and the population has since increased, not only in California, but in New Mexico and Texas, with a won- derful rapidity. * See the official report of the commander-in-chief, General Scott, dated September 18, 1847, from the National Palace of Mexico. t Mansfield, Mexican War, p. 332. A. D. 1848 — 1850.] DISTURBANCES IN EUROPE. 475 Such was the immediate effect of the Mexican treaty on the minds and conduct of the American people. As for the two distinguished men that acted the chief part in the war. General Scott and General Taylor, they found a proper reward for their brilliant achievements in the esteem and gratitude of their fellow-citizens. The former enjoyed the honor of being considered one of the best generals of his time, and the latter, besides a similar reputation attached to his name, was raised, soon after the conclusion of the war, to the first dignity of his country, that of President of the United States. He died in the exer- cise of his functions, on the 9th of July, 1850. DISTURBANCES AND REVOLUTIONS IN EUROPE.* A. D. 1848—1850. While the United States were thus rapidly rising in power and in extent of territory, Europe was given up to a series of political dis- turbances and revolutions. In various parts of that continent, either discontent under the pressure of misery, or more frequently, a spirit of restlessness and insubordination, and an inordinate desire of social changes, gave rise to many violent outbreaks against governments. Independently of several incidents of this kind that occurred in Swit- zerland, Germany, Prussia, &c., such was the case particularly with France, the Austrian dominions, and the different States of Italy. For some time previous to the year 1848, the storm was preparing, which subsequently burst on the continent of Europe. It first mani- fested itself in P-aris, the principal and ordinary theatre of revolutions. In consequence of some dictatorial measures taken by King Louis Philip for the security of his crown, the Parisian population rose in immense crowds, and in the short space of a day (the 22d of Febru- ary, 1848,) overthrew his government. It is difficult to conceive any thing more inglorious than the downfall of that monarch, tJ41 then reputed one of the ablest sovereigns in the world; he fled with pre- cipitation, and every symptom of terror, towards the sea-coast, and seized upon the first opportunity to embark for England, where he continued to reside with his family. * The reader will easily perceive that the revolutionists of Europe are not viewed, here, in the same favorable light as they are by many persona on this side of the Atlantic. Want of sufficient acquaintance Avith the real state of things may be pleaded as an excuse for these persons; yet it is surprising that those European Socialists, Red Republicans, &c., should be considered the friends of liberal and free institutions, merely because they have continually in their mouths the names of liberty and republi- canism, while their real object, generally speakingj is no other than dis- order, anarchy, plunder |ind spoliation; even frequently assassination and bloodshed; in a word, oppression of others, and for themselves unre- strained license to commit every species of evil. This, in fact, is what their conduct and actions have sufficiently given us to understand : " By their fruits you shall know them." 476 MODEKN HISTORY. ~ [PART 8. In the interim, a provisional government was organized in Paris The chief acts of this transient power were, on the one hand, ar enormous increase of taxes, and on the other, the convocation of a national assembly, or congress, to be composed of representatives from all parts of France, and whose capital object would be to frame a new constitution for the country. This was accordingly done, and the session voted for a republican form of government, in which the legislative power should reside in a national assembly, consisting of seven hundred representatives elected for three years, and the executive power in a president, chosen for four years by a majority of the people. But these regulations did not satisfy a certain class of men, who, under the name of Red Republicans or Socialists, wished to destroy every distinction of rank, every inequality of fortune, and, contrary to all regulations of property, aimed at enriching' one-half of the people, and themselves first of all, at the expense of the other halt. The abettors of this party resting their hopes much more on con- tinual changes of government than on any regular state of things, prepared to make, in the very centre of Paris, a mighty effort to frustrate the views of the national assembly, bring the city under their own control, and effect a new revolution. Numerous and well-organized forces, a vast amount of guns and ammunition, a well-combined plan of attack, skilful leaders, barri- cades and other fortifications, all contributed to render the Parisian insurrection of June, 1848, one of the most formidable attempts that ever threatened the existence of social order. It required all the devotedness of the well-meaning citizens and troops, all the energy of General Cavaignac and other brave commanders, in fine, three days of hard fighting and much bloodshed, to suppress entirely this terrible manifestation of the socialist party. Among all the victims of those days, the most conspicuous was M. Affre, archbishop of Paris, who, in his earnest desire to imitate the good shepherd that gives his life for his sheep, fell mortally wounded near a barricade, whilst endeavoring to soothe the feelings of -the misguided portion of his flock, and to effect a reconciliation. As if his blood had pos- sessed a secret virtue to remedy the public evils, no serious disturb- ances, although attempts were made to excite new ones, for a long time after occurred in France. Both the executive government, and the far greater portion of the national assembly, have always mani- fested a firm determination to maintain order and tranquillity. The late victory over the insurgents had done great honor to General Cavaignac, and raised him high in the esteem of the nation. Hence he appeared as a candidate for the presidency, and with great probability of success ; but the tide of popular favor was seen to take another direction. Whether out of respect for the name of Napoleon, or through the hope of returning to a princely form of government, Louis Napoleon, a nephew of the great emperor of France, was elected, in December, 1848, president of the French republic. Similar, in many respects, to the disturbances of France, were A. D. 1848 — 1850.] DISTURBANCES IN EUROPE. 477 those which at the same time agitated Germany, and especially the various parts of the Austrian empire. A revolutionary spirit per- vaded, to a greater or less extent, Vienna, Prague, and other cities, together with Hungary, Lombardy, and other provinces. So violent indeed was the storm at a certain period, that the Emperor Ferdinand came to the determination of abdicating his crown, and executed his resolution towards the close of the year 1848, in behalf of his nephew, the Archduke Francis Joseph. The court, however, whilst yield- ing something to the exigency of the times, did not sink under the weight of so many difficulties. With a firmness and energy worthy of the Austrian character, the government levied numerous troops, and, by persevering in their efforts, gradually succeeded in sup- pressing the insurrection in all the places and countries just men- tioned. The struggle, it is true, was long and obstinately maintained, both in Hungary and Northern Italy ; but it merely served, on that account, to make the cause of Austria triumph in a more conspicu- ous and decided manner. The Hungarian insurgents were so often and so signally defeated by the Russians on the one side, and by the Austrians on the other, that it may be truly said of them that they are now completely prostrate at the feet of these two great powers. The war in Northern Italy was not less decisive in favor of AuS' tria. It seemed at first that the insurgents of Lombardy, aided by the chivalrous king of Sardinia, Charles Albert, would carry every thing before them, and expel for ever those whom they called foreigners from their territory ; but their triumph was very short, and their joy quickly damped by subsequent reverses. Numerous armies of Austrians, pouring in from the Alps, soon restored the imperial power throughout Lombardy, and Charles Albert was not only disappointed in his lofty designs of conquest and aggrandize- ment, but even taught, by several defeats, to tremble for his own kingdom (a. d. 1848). An armistice, however, was granted him by the conquerors. But as the two parties could not, in the interval, come to a settlement of their differences, preparations were made on both sides for a renewal of hostilities. There now existed a still greater dispropor- tion between them than before, and the king of Sardinia, well aware of it, recommenced the struggle much against his own judg- ment, and compelled, as it were, by the earnest wishes of imprudent counsellors and subjects. The common feeling on the opposite side was quite the reverse ; the armies of Austria, and their able com- mander-in-chief. Marshal Radetski, were animated by the recollec- tion of past success, and marched to the field of battle with an entire confidence of future triumphs. Radetski left INIilan at the head of forty thousand men, on the loth of March, 1849, and crossed the Tessino on the 20th, by the bridge at Yigevano. At that place he met with some slight resist- ance from the Piedmoutcse, ]jut not of such a nature as to impede his progress; he therefore immediately advanced to Mortara, and, 478 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 8. while with the main body of his troops he wer t on towards Ver- celli, so disposed his left wing as to intercept one-half of the Pied- montese army. By this sudden and bold advance of their enemy, two of their divisions were separated from the rest, and Charles Albert, who commanded in person the other portion of the Sardinian army, was forced to give battle upon very unequal terms. He had scarcely any artillery, whilst the Austrians had upwards of a hun- dred field pieces, which enabled them to destroy thousands of the Piedmontese with grape-shot; hence the latter were entirely de- feated, and compelled to retire precipitately towards Turin. This battle was fought on the 22d of March, nine days after the depar- ture of Radetski from Milan. On the following day, the two parties again came in collision near Novara, where the Austrians gained a second victory still more signal and complete than the first. It appears that the Piedmontese made a still greater resistance than in the previous battle, and that their loss was frightful, not being less, it is thought, than fifteen thousand men killed. The sad remnants of their troops were routed in every direction ; Charles Albert himself, after having during the conflict given proofs of the most determined courage, fled into Switzerland, and thence into Spain, not however till he had abdi- 'cated his crown in favor of his son Victor. Such was the result of those dreams of ambition, which had prompted him to believe that he might gain possession of all Northern Italy. Marshal Kadetski returned in triumph to Milan, after an absence of only eleven days, during which he had achieved one of the most glorious exploits of modern times. He had skilfully arranged his plans, and kept them so secret that the Piedmontese had no means of discovering them, till it was too late to prevent their own total overthrow. Hence his victory proved a decisive one, and put an end to the war. In August following, a treaty was concluded be- tween the two states upon terms favorable to Austria, without, however, derogating from the honor of the Sardinian government. Great disturbances and alarming insurrections had likewise oc- curred in the south of Italy, but all were also suppressed by the vigor and energy of the Neapolitan court. Indeed, the obstinate resistance of several cities, especially in Sicily, (for instance, Catana, Messina and Syracuse), merely served to provoke against them measures of greater severit}'". Owing to a variety of circumstances, affairs have not been so soon and so easily settled at Rome. Long before this, the enlightened and benevolent pontiff, Pius TX, had taken the lead of all contem- porary sovereigns in granting liberal institutions to his people, and in doing for them whatever could reasonably be attempted for their prosperity and happiness. This beneficence at first excited univer- sal applpvuse and enthusiasm ; when, through the vile intrigues and machinations of his enemies, these just sentiments towards the rope were in a short time superseded by revolt and ingratitude. There is no kind of outrage that was not perpetrated against his paternal authority by these enemies of order and virtue, whether A. D. 1848 — 1850.] DISTUKBANCES IN EUROPE. 479 natives of Rome or foreigners, the very dregs of European society. As their only object was to promote their own interest, even at the sacrifice of public and private tranquillity, the most abusive lan- guage, misrepresentations, calumnies, plots and assassinations, became at Rome the order of the day. Cowardice, or treason and rebellion, deprived the pope of every means to stop these disorders ; nay, his prime minister. Count Rossi, was publicly murdered, and he himself being attacked and imprisoned, as it were, in his own palace, was more and more exposed to the savage clamors and at- tempts of an infuriated rabble. At length, by the skilful manage- ment of the Bavarian and French ambassadors, he happily escaped from Rome, and travelling in haste, reached Gaeta, in the kingdom of Naples, where he met with the most cordial reception from both the king and the king's family and subjects (November, 1848). The first solemn act performed by the pontiff in his exile, was one of apostolical vigor. No later than the 1st of January, 1849, he excommunicated the usurpers of his power and the oppressors of his people, and, as this measure had little effect on persons that were total strangers to feelings of religion, honor and humanity, he appealed, in order to check the course of their impious and pre- datory excesses, to the intervention of the catholic powers. The appeal was readily responded to. While the Austrians, Neapolitans and Spaniards sent bodies of troops to the different provinces of the Ecclesiastical State, to re-establish in them the pope's authority, a French army, having landed at Civita Vecchia, fearlessly proceeded against Rome itself, defended as it was by fortifications, barricades, and, it is said, twenty-eight thousand Socialists, Romans and foreigners. The French met at first a trifling check, which merely taught them to be more cautious in their advance. The skill of General Oudinot and the bravery of his troops soon bore every thing before them, and, by ruining the works and carrying the strongest positions of the enemy, forced the city to an unconditional sur- render, on the 29th of June, 1849. On the 2d of July, the victori- ous general entered it at the head of his army, and immediately proclaimed the restitution of the pontifical government ; yet the pope's return to Rome was still postponed, and did not take place till the following April. Such was the slate of affairs throughout Europe in the beginning of the year 1850. It fortunately happened, on the following year, through a special intervention of the Providence of God, moved by the prayers of His people, that, whilst a new and frightful storm was seen gathering on all sides, the President of the French Republic, Napoleon, by suddenly concentrating the ruling power in his hands, crippled the power of Socialism and other discordant parties in France^ a masterly stroke of policy or coup d'etat, applauded by the friends of order, and looked upon as a measure that saved not only France, but probably several other countries, from the unfathomable abyss of evils with which they were threatened. Yet, the abettors of 480 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 8. public disturbances and the members of secret societies were still much to be feared, if not, perhaps, for their actual endeavors, at least for their desires to undermine, where and when they could, as well religion as the existing governments. CRIMEAN WAR.— A. d. 1854—1856. In the year 1853, the East of Europe became again the theatre of momentous events. The Russian Czar, Nicholas, proud of his colos- sal power, and ill concealing his ambition under the plea of protecting the Greek subjects of the Ottoman empire,* declared war against the Turks, and himself opened the contest by invading the Danubian Provinces of the Turkish territory. Though the Russians had gene- rally failed in their first attempts at conquest, and had even suffered great losses, especially at Giurgevo and before the walls of Silistria, the other great powers in Europe took the alarm, on seeing endan- gered the integrity of Turkey, the maintenance of which seemed necessary for the preservation of the European equilibrium. England and France, Prussia and Austria offered their mediation ; but their efforts did not obtain the desired effect, and the war between the two empires continued. Accordingly, in the spring of the year 1854, England, under dueen Victoria, and France, under Napoleon lll,t espoused the cause of the Sultan. The allies having compelled the Russians to withdraw from the Danubian Provinces, began, in their turn, a war of aggression. They resolved to take possession of Sebastopol, which was the seat of the Russian power in the Crimean peninsula. On the 14th of Septem- ber, the French, English and Turks landed at Eupatoria without meeting any resistance; and on the 20th, the battle of Alma opened for them the way to Sebastopol. The siege of that stronghold was destined to be one of the most memorable in history. Terrible was the attack by land and by sea, equally terrible was the defence. The eyes of all Europe were turned tov/ards Sebastopol, and all the efforts of the belligerants were concentrated on that point. The Czar sent thither constant reinforcements; the Western powers did the same. Every spot of ground in the neighborhood of the city witnessed some wonderful display of constancy and valor. The siege, in which the * Strange to say, the emperor Nicholas pretended to vindicate the rights of his co-religionists, whom the Turkish government did not persecute, whilst he himself cruelly oppressed numbers of his unoffending Catholic subjects. I The young duke of Reichstadt, son of the first NajDoleon, is supposed, under the new dynasty, to have been, by rigid, Emperor Napoleon II. A. D. 1854—1856.] CRIMEAN WAR. 481 Sardinians took part in January, 1855, lasted, amidst almost daily encoDnters, until the beginning of September. The alhes, then, thinking their works sufficiently advanced, fixed on the 8th of that month for a general assault. They opened it by a terrible bombard- ment, which began on the 5th, and was continued for three days and three nights. When the batteries ceased thundering, the besiegers rivalling one another in courage, precipitated themselves with aston- ishing intrepidity upon the defences of the enemy. Yet, it was not till after prodigies of valor, after being repulsed in six previous assaults, that the French succeeded in taking the Malakoff tower, which com- manded the southern part of the city, and was the principal defence of Sebastopol. Before retiring. Prince Gortschakoff, the Russian com- mander, completed the sinking of his fleet, blew up those portions both of the fortifications and of the town., which he was compelled to abandon, and intrenched himself in the northern part of Sebastopol. Here again he continued for some time to oppose a desperate resist- ance to a gigantic attack ; and when he was no longer able to with- stand the combined efforts of his enemies, he made a skilful retreat, which enabled him to avoid a disastrous capitulation. Sebastopol had become by this time a heap of ruins. Her fall was the occasion first of an armistice, then of the treaty of Paris, which was signed on the 30th of March, 1856. By this treaty, the Sultan confirmed the ancient privileges of his Christian subjects; Russia renounced all protectorate over the Danubian Provinces; the naviga- tion of the Danube was declared free through the whole extent of the river; the Black Sea, of which Russia had been the sole mistress since the destruction of the Turkish navy at Navarino, became neu- tral, and was henceforth interdicted to any vessel of war; nor could any arsenal be, in future, erected on its borders. Such were the conditions to which Alexander II, who had succeeded his father, Nicholas, during the siege, was forced to submit; conditions which took from Russia her most powerful means of action against Turkey, and made her lose all the advantages which it had taken her half a century to acquire. But, in consequence of the recent termination of a terrible thirty years' war against the Circassians, of the actual pros- tration of Poland, and of what appears to be a very close alliance with the United States, she seems, at present, (1867,) as able as ever to renew the prosecution of her long meditated projects of aggrandize- ment, at the expense of Turkey. It is doubtful whether the Western powers will ever again be sufficiently united and strong, to stop the execution of a usurpation so important in its results as to have elicited from Napoleon I this noted saying : " Russia at Constantinople would become the mistress of the world.'' 41 482 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 8. THE ITALIAN WAR AND ITS CONSEQUENCES. A. D. 1859—1861. Ti^E influence of Austria had become preponderant in Italy since 1849. She liad a powerful army in her Lombardo-Venitian King- dom; her troops occupied the Legations; she saw either Austrian archdukes or faithful allies in all the secular princes of the peninsula, excepting Victor Emmanuel II, King of Sardinia. Assured of the friendship of England, and trusting in the assistance of Napoleon III, Victor Emmanuel, whose policy was now directed by count Cavour, resolved to employ every means, not only to ruin the Austrian power in Italy, but also to take advantage of all the discontents, legitimate or otherwise, of the peninsula. For some time, he had been con- stantly 'arming for this object, and had called to his aid volunteers Irom every other State of Italy. The emperor of Austria complained of such measures, and demanded the cessation of these preparations and the discharge of the volunteers. His reclamations being unheeded, he ordered his army to cross the Tessino and invade the Sardinian territory. According to a resolution previously notified to Austria, Napoleon III caused at once his own army to enter Italy, and placed himself at its head to direct the operations of the campaign. Then began a short but bloody war, in which both parties displayed the most heroic valor. The great battle of Magenta, near the Tessino, (June 4th, 1859,) remained for a long time undecided; finally, the Austrians began to retreat, and evacuated Milan. A second and more fearful engage- ment took place on the right bank of the Mincio, near Solferino, (June 24th,) and lasted, with alternate success, from four o'clock in the morning till eight in the evening. The presence of their three sovereigns gready animated the combatants, and urged them on to feats of the most daring intrepidity. To the horrors of the conflict were added those of the elements. At four o'clock in the evening, a terrific hurricane swept over the two armies, and com.pelled them to suspend their bloody work. But the storm was hardly over, when the battle recommenced at all points with the same fury. At length, the Austrians, who had engaged in the conflict with two hundred and twenty thousand men, and had suffered greater losses than their opponents, ceased fighting, recrossed the Mincio, and effected their retreat in good order, the enemy not daring to molest them. Though defeated, they had lost neither courage nor confidence, and they took a strong position in the vicinity ot Verona. This still formidable aspect of the vanquished, the difficulty of storming the fortresses that protected Venetia, the fear of seeing all Germany side with Austria, induced the victors promptly to secure A. D. 1859— 1861.] ITALIAN WAR, ETC. . 483 the already effected conquest of Lombardy, even at the price of aban- doning their long-cherished plan of driving the Austrians from the whole peninsula. Therefore, on July 7th, Napoleon sent an autograph letter to Francis-Joseph, and offered a truce to last till the 15th of August, w^hich was accepted. The two emperors having met at Vil- lafranca, resolved to conclude a peace, and agreed upon the chief points of the treaty. A more detailed discussion of these points took place at Zurick, whither the interested parties sent their plenipoten- tiaries. Napoleon obtained that Lombardy should be delivered to the King of Sardinia, and some months after, received in return Savoy and the County of Nice. But these were not the only results of the Italian war. The defeat of the Austrians had allowed the revolutionists to begin, immediately after the battle of Magenta, that so-called marvellous transformation of Italy, which deprived several sovereigns of their dominions, and united the whole peninsula under the sway of the late King of Sardinia, now King of Italy. This transformation its authors have tried to represent as the result of a free consent on the part of the people; but it should rather be considered the work of a few men bribed by money to ask for annexation to Piedmont, whilst the majority of the population were forcibly reduced to silence. The papal dominions were among the first that experienced the effect of such means, openly used or encouraged by the Sardinian government, and derisively styled moral means. The Austrian garrison had no sooner withdrawn from Bologna, than the revolutionists in that city proclaimed dictator, Victor Emmanuel, who ultimately united to his kingdom, in March, 1860, not only Bologna with all Romagna, a part of the papal terri- tory ; but, at the same time, the Duchies of Parma and Modena, and the Grand Duchy of Tuscany. Pius IX, seeing his protestations against these usurpations without effect, and his appeals to the Catho- lic powers for assistance unheeded, now called upon the faithful throughout Europe, to furnish him with the means of preventing any further progress of the revolution in the provinces still remaining under his authorhy. At his invitation, a French general of high repu- tation, de Lamoriciere, generously undertook the difficult task of form- ing an army capable of securing this end. Attracted by the name of the hero and the holiness of the cause, young men of most distin- guished families came in considerable numbers from all parts, to range themselves under the standard of the Pope. But suddenly and with- out any declaration of war, a Sardinian army of sixty thousand men, provided whh a formidable artillery and headed by General Cialdini, crossed (Sept. 1860) the Roman frontiers, invaded the Marches, and at Castelfidardo, near Loretto, fell upon the heroic band of pontifical volunteers, who, overpowered by numbers, were either killed or cap- tured. Their commander, de Lamoriciere, passing uninjured through the enemy, succeeded in escaping to Ancona. But this city, deprived of all succor, and shelled by the Sardinian fleet, was forced after a few days, siege to caphulate. With Ancona the Holy See lost the Marches 484: MODERN HISTORY. [PART 8. and Umbria, that is to say, the remainder of her possessions, with the exception of a narrow territory along the Mediterranean, including the cities of Rome and Civita Vecchia with an aggregate population of about half a million of inhabitants. Meanwhile the revolution was continuing its progress over other parts of Italy. In the beginning of May, ('I860,) Garibaldi, secretly assisted by England, landed in Sicily with two thousand volunteers j and caused a revolt, which had just broken out in this Island, to tri- umph. This being accomplished, he recrossed the sea to snatch from Francis II, the youthful king of the Two-Sicilies, his continental pos- sessions. Treason, always in advance of the adventurer, opened the cities to him ; and, without striking a blow, he entered Naples on the 7th of September. Then Cialdini, with the same army that had crushed the papal forces, at Castelfidardo, hastened to his assistance, and laid siege to Gaeta, which was bravely defended by Francis II. That city, however, being at length forced to surrender, (13th of Feb- ruary, 1861,) Francis retired to Rome on board of a French vessel. A few days after, the first Italian parliament, composed of deputies from all Italy, except Venetia and what remained of the States of the Church, assembled at Turin and proclaimed Victor Emmanuel II, King of Italy. That prince has since transported the seat of government to Flo- rence; but the Italian revolutionists are not yet satisfied, and their desire of having Rome for the Capital of the new Kingdom of Italy is but too well known. As long as a French garrison remained in that city, that is, up to September, 1866, no fear was entertained of seeing them actually carry our their evil designs. But should it happen, now that the Pope has been left to his own feeble resources, that Rome is to be incorporated into the Kingdom of Italy, and the Holy Father driven once more from the eternal city, we feel confident that his exile will be of short duration, and the acclamation of a grateful people will, as heretofore on similar occasions, welcome his return to the indestructible See of Peter. EUROPEAN EXPEDITIONS TO CHINA, COCHIN-CHINA, AND MEXICO. A. D. 1857—1866. In 1857, England and France undertook in common an expedition against China, the former to avenge injuries done to her navy, the latter, the death of several of her missionaries. The capture of Can^ ton and the threatening advance of the allies towards Pekin, forced the Chinese to sign at Tsien-Tsin, (June, 1858,) a treaty, which gave the two Western powers the right of having an ambassador at Pekin; opened five new pons to European commerce; and guaranteed the free exercise of the Christian religion in the whole empire. In the A. D. 1857 — 1866.] EUROPEAN EXPEDITIONS, ETC. 485 following year, fresh hostilities on the part of the Chinese once more compelled the allies to send against them considerable reinforcements. Their combined forces, triumphing over all resistance, boldly advanced under the very walls of Pekin, and entered the city on the 13th of October, 1860. The Tsiea-Tsin treaty was then ratified ; the Chinese promised, besides, to restore to the Christians their religious establish- ments, to open three ports more, and pay a war indemnity of sixty millions of francs lo each of the victorious powers. This happy completion of the Chinese expedition allowed France to terminate another, which she had undertaken with Spain, in 1858, against Tu-Duc, emperor of Annam, in order to chastise him for his cruelties towards European missionaries, and for insults offered to the French navy. The French and Spaniards had succeeded, soon after their arrival, in taking the cities of Tourane and Saigon; but affairs in China interrupted any further operations. However, as soon as Napoleon could dispose of a part oi the forces which he had sent against the Chinese, he ordered them to resume active hostilities against the Annamites. The success of his troops compelled Tu-Duc to sign the treaty of Saigon, June, 1862, which ceded three provinces to France and stipulated an indemnity for the expenses of the war, the opening of three ports in Ton-Kin, and the free exercise of the Christian religion in the whole empire of Annam. Spain took no part in this latter expedition; but turning her energies to a field of action nearer home, and in spite of her internal troubles, in a short and glorious war against Morocco, (I860,) she taught the Mahome- tans to respect the life and religion of the Christians, and secured for herself pecuniary and territorial indemnities. She, moreover, in con- cert with England and France, sent, soon after, troops to Mexico. After the war between the United States and Mexico, the latter country which had scarcely enjoyed a year of repose since the procla- mation of her independence, was plunged in a still greater anarchy. Her internal dissensions became narrowed down into a fierce contest between the church or conservative party, and the liberals, whose aim was to abolish the special privileges of the clergy. A last strug- gle between President Miramon, chief of the conservative party, and Juarez, chief of the liberals, raised the latter to the Presidency, (Janu- ary, 1861.) Juarez immediately began to persecute the church and organize a wholesale pillage of her properties. Without any regard for international law or previous treaties, he suspended or annulled such obligations as had been contracted by the preceding government of Mexico towards European governments. England, Spain and France, whose honor and interests had been more particularly injured by his repeated malversations, signed a treaty known as the London Convenlii>n, (30th of October, 1861,) and resolved to act in common against him. Whilst their troops were already stationed upon the Eastern coasts of Mexico, misunders'.andings arose among the three European pow- ers. England and Spain, now contented with pecuniary satisfaction, 41* 486 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 8. withdrew their forces. Napoleon, however, persisted in carrying out unaided the primitive plan, reinforced his portion of troops, and openly declared his intention to regenerate the country and furnish it with the means of establishing a solid government. The French army, under General Forey, captured Puebla after a siege of two months, (17th of May, 1863,) and made their entrance into the city of Mexico on the following June. An assembly of Notables then con- vened in that capital ; and at once, without debate, declared unani- mously for an imperial government. The Archduke Maximilian of Austria was at the same time proclaimed emperor. When that prince arrived at Mexico, (May, 1866,) he found everything in a condition apparently favorable to his interests. Juarez had been compelled by the French soldiers to retire into the Northern mountains, and estab- lish his government at San Luis Potosi. The emperor Maximilian having the support of the conservative party, and with forty thousand men at his command, might have crushed all resistance and established his authority upon a solid basis. Bui he began, on the very first year of his administration, to alienate his supporters, by ratifying the past sales of church property. This and other measures, which he thought himself bound by circumstances to take, in order to concih'ate the liberals, failed to enhst their sympathies. Moreover, his chief main-stay has been but recently withdrawn by the departure of the French troops, whom Napoleon was compelled to recall, at the instance of the United States' government and to satisfy public opinion in. France. Recent accounts from Mexico indicate that the fate of the ephemeral empire is already sealed,* But the day has not yet arrived, on which this distracted country will emerge from that internal anarchy, which has been more or less prevailing among all the petty republics of Central and Southern America, ever since the acquisition of their independence. CIVIL WAR IN THE UNITED STATES. A. D. 1861—1865. Whilst the United States were advancing with rapid strides in population, wealth and power, and presenting to the world the spec- tacle of a material progress truly unparalleled in history, they sud- denly became the theatre of a gigantic civil war, which had its cause in the institution of domestic slavery. A large number of persons, particularly in the Northern States, had always regarded slavery as a blot on the escutcheon of the Republic, and towards the year 1832, commenced a political agitation for its abolition, which was followed * Since these lines were written, Maximilian has been captured and shot, and the empire of Mexico has ceased to exist. A- D. 1861—1865.] CIVAL WAR, ETC. 487 by a counteracting agitation for its defence. Two parties were thus formed ; and on the election of Abraham Lincoln to the Pre'sidency, (Nov. 4th, I860,) the pro-slavery party considering their interests insecure under his administration, resolved to carry out their long- threatened project of secession. Before the inauguration of the new President, and notwithstanding his protestations of maintaining the laws of the Union, the seven slave-holding States of South Carolina, Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana and Texas (they were soon joined by the States of Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina and Tennessee) formed themselves into a separate Confederacv, and elected Jefferson Davis, President. They hastened moreover to take possession of all the forts and public property within their limits. Major Anderson having refused to deliver up Fort Sumter, in Charles- ton harbor, was, on the 12th of April, 1861, attacked by five Confede- rate batteries under the command of General Beauregard. The fort surrendered on the afternoon of the 13th, and was evacuated on Sun- day, the 14th. An uncontrollable excitement now burst over the country, at this signal of war. As the news flashed over the telegraphic wires, it was instantly followed by the summons of the President, *' to arms." On the night of the 14th was issued his proclamation, ordering seventy-five thousand men into the field for the defence of the Union. In July, General McDowell, having command of the Federal force assembled around Washington, began to March upon Richmond, in Virginia, which had lately become the capital ot the new Confede- racy. He soon met with a portion of the Confederate troops, under the command of General Beauregard. On the 21st of July, a serious conflict between the two armies took place near a small creek named Bull Run, and terminated in the complete route of the Union forces. This defeat at once aroused the Northern States to more energetic action, and to a keener sense of the magnitude of the struggle iu which they were engaged. Congress immediately took efficacious measures to levy an immense army, and so great were the exertions made to promote volunteering, so liberal were the bounties offered to those who might enlist, that the number of troops in the field, by the beginning of the year 18G2, exceeded four hundred and fifty thou- sand.* The Southerners, an their side, prepared for war with no less ardor. The success of Bull Run had awakened among them such a spirit of enthusiasm, and jsuch confidence in the ultimate triumph of the Confederacy, that volunteers offered themselves in very large numbers. They were, however, found insufficient to resist the vari- ous corps of Federals, which operated simultaneously in Virginia, West Virginia, Tennessee, North Carolina and Kentucky. The Con- * The Federal forces amounted to a still greater number at the subse- quent epochs, especially towards the end of the war; whilst it is said that the Confederates, owing to the inferiority of their population and tho embarrassed condition of their public finances, had hardly at any timo more than three hundred thousand men in the field. 488 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 8. federate Congress then passed (April, 1862) an act of conscription, which declared every man, with a few exceptions, between the ages of eighteen and thirty-five years, a soldier. This measure, it was supposed, would secure a sufficient number of men lo repel success- fully every assault of the enemy. But, by that time, the campaign had been fairly inaugurated and some important events had already transpired. Fort Donelson on the Cumberland river was attacked in February by General Grant. For several days, the Confederate garrison obsti- nately defended every approach to the Fort. But, on the third day, the outer works were stormed by the Union troops, and the main redoubt that commanded the principal fortress, was carried. Early on the following morning, white flags of truce were discovered float- ing on the Confederate works. A correspondence opened between Generals Buckner and Grant. The result was the unconditional sur- render to General Grant, of all the munitions of war and of thirteen thousand Confederate prisoners. Within two months of this brilliant affair, the now victorious army of the North, in its turn, found itself in a very perilous situation. Whilst it lay encamped at Pittsburg Landing, awaiting the junction of a Federal corps under General Buell, Generals Beauregard and A. S. Johnston resolved to profit by their present numerical superiority to fall upon the enemy, before the arrival of the expected succor. They accordingly attacked with great vigor the positions of General Grant, rendered themselves mas- ters of a part of his camp, and secured many prisoners. Darkness, however, in putting an end to the contest, changed the fortune of the combatants. The Union army having been reinforced by fresh troops from the army of the Ohio, recovered, on the next day, a portion of the captured cannons, and compelled the Confederates to give way and retreat. The slaughter on both sides was terrific, but the Union forces sustained the heaviest losses. A few days after ttiis bloody battle, the country learned the capture of New Orleans, by a combined force under Commodore Farragut and General Butler. Towards the middle of March, 1862, General McClellan, now com- mander of the army of the Potomac, embarked his troops at Alexan- dria, with the intention of making a sure and rapid movement upon Richmond. Not having the entire control of the James river, he landed his army at Fortress Monroe, and began to advance from that point towards the eneniy^s capital. The Confederate works before Yorktown soon arrested his march, and it was not till after the delay of a month, that he succeeded in securing that strong position. Tn spite of new obstacles, and though he had to contest almost every inch of ground, he approached within a few miles of Richmond. But the enemy had by this time received large reinforcements, whilst his own army had been greatly reduced by losses during the campaign, and by sickness on the banks of the Chickahominy. Seeing himself pressed by superior numbers, he resolved by a flank movement towards the James river, to change his base of operations. For six A. D. 1861 — 1865.] CIVIL WAR, ETC. 489 days, the Confederates harrassed his march by continual attacks, and even entertained the hope of capturing the entire Federal army. But the successful stand which he made at Malvern Hill, (July 1, 1862,) a strong position within range of the gunboats, checked all further demonstration against him on the part of the enemy, and terminated the Peninsular campaign. The failure of this campaign inspired the Confederate government with the desire of abandoning their defensive policy. They resolved to invade the Union territory, in order to strike some important blow, which would enable them to dictate terms of peace. In vain did General Pope oppose ihe invading army under General Leej he was compelled to retreat before the enemy, and was severely defeated at the second battle of Bull Run (30th of August, 1862). General Mc- Clellan, now recalled from Virginia, advanced with all the forces that were not required for the defence of Washington, to stop the over- whelming march of the Confederates. He met them upon the banks of a stream in Maryland, made memorable by the bloody battle of Antietam, Each army numbered, it is said, a hundred thousand men. They began the conflict at daylight on the 17th of September, 1862, and fought with great resolution and various success, till night came on and put an end to the contest. General McClellan obtained indeed a substantial and decided success ; but his own troops had suf- fered so severely, that it was deemed prudent to give them rest and refreshment before renewing the attack. On the night of the 18th, General Lee hastily withdrew his forces across the Potomac, and retired into Virginia. In November, a change was made in the army of the Potomac. General McClellan was relieved of the command, and General Burn- side, who was appointed to succeed him, immediately took measures for a new advance upon Richmond. The march to the Confederate capital was to be made by the route through Fredericksburg, a city on the south bank of the Rappahannock, sixty-five miles from Rich- mond. General Lee occupied it with a part of his forces ; the rest he had concentrated on the heights in the rear of the city. When the Federals attacked Fredericksburg, no greater opposition was made than was sufficient to tempt them to push forward with greater ardor. But as soon as they tried to storm the enemy's works on the heights, they were received with so terrific a fire of infantry and artillery, that, finding the position too strong to be captured by assault, they gave up the attack, and profited by the night to evacuate Fredericksburg (December 13th, 1862). The next advance upon Richmond was undertaken, in the follow- ing year, by the same army, now under General Hooker. Having crossed the Rappahannock with a hundred and twenty thousand men, a force far superior to that which General Lee could oppose to him, General Hooker succeeded in compelling the Confederates to quit their defences and accept the battle at Chancellorsville, Virginia, on a ground of his own choice. But the result of this engagement. 490 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 8. which took pface on the 2d and 3d of May, 1863, proved most disas- trous to the Federals ; and they were driven back beyond the Rappa- hannock, with a loss of eighteen thousand men. The Confederates had, on their side, to deplore the loss of their favorite General, Stone-- wall Jackson, whose daring, skill and energy had greatly contributed to their past success, and especially in this last engagement at Chan- cellorsville.* After this battle. General Lee, with the view of break- ing up the Federal plan of campaign for the Summer, and of transfer- ring the scene of hostilities beyond Virginia, crossed with his army the fords of the Potomac, marched through Maryland into Pennsylvania, and concentrated his forces at Gettysburg, a county-town of the latter State. There he was met by General Meade, who encamped his troops in a strong position. On the 1st, 2d and 3d of July, the two armies engaged in a terrible but decisive battle. On the third day. General Lee made desperate efforts to dislodge the Federals from their position; but finding it almost impregnable, and his ammunition being exhausted, he was compelled, after sustaining a loss of thirty thousand men, to retreat into Virginia with the remnants of his army. Two other heavy blows were at the same time inflicted upon the Confederates in the South. Thus far the navigation of the Mississippi river had remained closed between Port Hudson (Louisiana) and Vicksburg (Mississippi). General Grant, with the design of opening the river entirely, undertook an expedition against Vicksburg. But the approach to this place proved most difficult, owing to its position and the eff'orts of the enemy, under General J. E. Johnston, to retain the key of the great river. It was not till after several battles and a campaign of startling boldness, that General Grant succeeded, by the 19th of May, in investing Vicksburg. Its garrison, commanded by General Pemberton, and numbering over thirty thousand men, made a gallant defence; but their provisions becoming very scarce, and no hope remaining of receiving relief from General Johnston, they surren- dered on the 4th of July, 1863. The surrender of Vicksburg was followed by that of Port Hudson. The capture of these two strongholds entirely opened the Missis- sippi to navigation and commerce, greatly crippled the resources of the enemy, and broke up their facilities for communication between the States east and west of that river. Their territory was by this time well-nigh exhausted of men ; and though they took every means to increase their forces; though nearly all of the male population had been called either to serve in the army or to assist in raising supplies: yet it is supposed that the whole number of men in the field at the beginning of the next campaign, did not exceed two hundred and fifty thousand. The Federal government, on the contrary, had then more than six hundred thousand soldiers. It could moreover, owing to the * Stonewall Jackson did not fall in battle. He was through accident, mortally wounded by the fire of his own men, while reconnoitering his outposts, late in the evening. A. D. 1861—1865.] CIVIL WAR, ETC. 491 large population of the North and the Conscription Bill of the 3d of March, 1S63, make new jevies at will, and thus pour upon the now weakened Southern Stales any number of troops that circumstances might require. Such was the state of affairs in May, 1864, at the renewal of hos- tilities. The main campaigns for that year were to be made by the armies of the Potomac, and of Chattanooga (Tennessee). The lat- ter army, under General Sherman, was to march against Atlanta, (Georgia,) a town noted for its manufactures and as being an import- ant centre of railroad communication between the Western and the Atlantic and Gulf States ; the former army, under General Meade, was to march again upon the capital of the Confederacy. But General Grant, now Lieutenant-General, who superintended in person the army of the Potomac, had a plan more comprehensive than the mere capture of Richmond. His project was to secure the machinery of the Confed- erate government, and, by combined movements, to destroy the forces of General Lee, and cut off all communications with Richmond. General Siegel was ordered to move up the Shenandoah Valley, and General Butler to move simultaneously with a heavy force up the .femes river for the purpose of capturing Petersburg, which was con- sidered the key to the capital. The failure of these two expeditions in the west and south of Virginia, enabled the enemy to concentrate against General Grant. But in spite of their efforts, and of his own heavy losses, the Federal commander succeeded, by means of constant reinforcements of fresh troops, in pushing his way to the Chickaho- miny, which was the outer-line defence of Richmond, and afterwards in crossing the James river and uniting his forces with those of General Butler before Petersburg (June, 1864). Meanwhile, events of no less importance were accomplished in Georgia. Geiieral J. E. Johnston, owing to the inferiority of his forces, was unable long to delay the advance of the Federals through the heart of the Confederacy. It was in vain that he successively occu- pied several strong positions on their route, and hoped to decimate their numbers in partial engagements; the vigor and skill of General Sherman baffled his projects, and the Confederate government, dis- pleased at his defensive tactics, relieved him from the command. Nor did the impetuous bravery of his successor. General Hood, have any other effect than to precipitate the fall of Atlanta. General Sherman entered it on the 1st of September, 1864. His troops had scarcely rested from their fatigues, when they were again put in motion, and just five weeks after their departure from Atlanta, the country was amazed to learn that they had reached and occupied Savannah, on the Atlantic coast. These successes hastened the downfall of the Confederacy. The field of decisive operations was now reduced to the three States of South and North Carolina and Virginia. During the Winter, General Sherman overran the Carolinas with his victorious army, and thereby cut off the resources of General Lee's troops at Richmond. In Vir- 492 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 8. ginia. General Grant renewed active operations against Petersburg. On the first of April, 1865, was fougtit the bloody battle of the Five Forks, by which the possession of Richmond was finally secured. General Lee finding that he was no longer able to maintain his posi- tion, gave orders for the evacuation of Richmond and Petersburg. Pursued with great vigor, he made strenuous but fruitless efforts to extricate his troops, and, on the 9tli of April, surrendered to General Grant the army of Northern Virginia. This important event was regarded by the country as a virtual end of the war. But the joy which it occasioned was soon changed into a deep mourning by the assassination, on the 14th, of Abraham Lincoln, who had been recently reelected President. This crime, however, cieated no public disturb- ance; Vice-President Johnson assumed immediately the office of Pre- sident, and the government continued the process of pacifying and reconstructing the country. The successful termination of the war has procured the emancipa- tion of four millions of human beings, augmented towards the country the respect of foreign nations, and displayed to the world her immense and inexhaustible resources, lately increased by the acquisition of the part of this continent hitherto known under the name of Russian America. WAR IN SCHLESWIG-HOLSTEIIT.— WAR IN ITALY AND GERMANY, a. d. 1863—1866. New complications arose in Europe at the death of King Frederick VII, of Denmark (^November, 1863). Christian IX succeeded him on the throne; but his right of succession to the duchies of Holstein and Schleswig was contested by the duke of Augustenburg. The Ger- man diet supported the claims of the latter with regard to Holstein, which was a part of the Germanic Confederation, and caused it to be occupied by Federal troops. Prussia and Austria, uniting in a com- mon cause, went still further; they marched into Schleswig and afterwards into Jutland a formidable army, to which the Danes with all their gallantry were forced to succumb. In October, 1864, King Christian was compelled to sign the treaty of Vienna, by which he ceded to Austria and Prussia the three duchies of Lauenburg, Hol- stein and Schleswig, engaging moreover to accept whatever arrange- ments for thejr government those powers might make. It soon- became evident that their friendship for the duke of Augustenburg Avas a mere pretext, at least on the part of Prussia. After obtaining from Austria the complete session of the duchy of Lauenburg, she made the utmost efforts to induce her ally to cede, in like manner, her rights to the two other duchies. The government of Austria declared that the question of the Duchies appertained to the German Diet, which was then assembled at Frankfort (IMay, 1866). A. D. 1863 — 1866.] WAR IN SCHLESWIG, ETC. 493 Thereupon Prussia, imitated by a few other States, withdrew from the Confederation ; and ordered her troops to invade Holstein, where no resistance was to be found. Yielding lo the ambitious views of Count Bismarck, her prime-minister, she also undertook to snatch from Austria her preponderance in Germany. Moreover, the King of Prussia, in order to divide the forces of his powerful rival, entered into a secret alhance with the King of Italy, who had always cher- ished the idea of conquering Venetia. War was accordingly de- clared against Austria, on the same day, by the two allied powers (June 18th). The Itahans having crossed the Mincio with a numerous army, were attacked by Archduke Albert, near Custozza, a spot already fatal to the Italian arms in 1848. After a long and severe contest the Italians were defeated with great losses, and compelled to recross the Mincio (June 24th). Their fortune was no better at sea; for their admiral Persano, with a fleet of twenty-three vessels, was attacked by inferior forces under the Austrian admiral Tegetoff, and obliged, after a loss of several ships, to take refuge in the port of Ancona (July 20th, 1866). In the North, Prussia had so well concerted her plans of attack that, on the 18th of June, her troops entered at once Hanover, Hesse- Cassel and Saxony, and spread themselves in every direction. Either by force of arms or by stratagem, they took possession of the three States just mentioned, occupied Frankfort, upon which they levied enormous contributions, and before the end of the campaign overran Darmstadt and Bavaria. At the same time, the Austrian empire was also invaded by about three hundred thousand men, in two armies, the one marching from Saxony commanded by prince Frederick Charles, the other proceed- ing from Silesia under the Crown Prince of Prussia. Field-Marshal de Benedeck, commander-in-chief of all the Austrian forces engaged in the North, endeavored, but ineffectually, to prevent a junction of the enemy's forces. They met at Gitschim, where the King of Prus- sia now arrived to take the command in person. Benedeck, who had waited in vain for the soldiers of Bavaria, amounting to eighty thou- sand men, was compelled to accept a general engagement against enemies far superior in number, and to whom the needle-gun had given another decided advantage. The battle of Sadowa, after eight or ten hours of fearful struggle, terminated in the route of the Austri- ans, who retreated in confusion behind the Elbe, with a loss of forty thousand men (July od). The emperor of Austria, unwilling to protract so disastrous a war, ceded Venetia to Napoleon III, with a secret understanding that it should be made over to the King of Italy. At the same time, he requested the emperor of France to mediate for peace. A prelimi- nary treaty, signed at Nicholsburg on the 26th of July, 1866, led in the following month to the treaty of Prague, of which these were the conditions : the emperor of Austria was required to ratify the cession 42 494 MODERN HISTORY. [PART 8. of Venelia; to abandon all claim to form a part of the Confed ration, which the King of Prussia intended to organize on the North of the Mayne river; to cede whatever rights the treaty of Vienna (1864) gave him on the duchies of Holstein and Schleswig. The States od the South of the Mayne were allowed to form also an independen' association, whose relations with the North should be regulated after wards J the Kingdom of Saxony remained unimpaired, but the annex ations already made by Prussia, of Hanover, Electoral Hesse, Nas sau and the city of Frankfort were to be implicitly recognized by Austria. By a special treaty made with Prussia, the Kingdom of Bavaria, which had not taken an active part in the war, retained her whole territory, on condition of paying a heavy sum of money. Thus, by the treaty of Prague, Austria, once the mighty power which ruled the destinies of Germany and Italy, was now isolated from the Germanic Confederation and humbled by the arrogant ambi- tion of Prussia, one of its confederates. These great changes show that God gives the power of this world to whom He pleases, and that the most prudent combinations of human policy are baffled by the designs of his unerring Providence. NOTES. NOTE A. — PAGE 39. CHARACTER AND DEATH OF SENECA, LUCAN, ETC. This Seneca, surnamed the Philosopher, to distinguish him from his fathnr Seneca, called the Orator, was a man of great genius and learning. He left a great number of moral treatises, which contain beautiful maxims mingled with many errors, and the style of which, labored and refined, greatly contributed to the decline of good taste and true eloquence in Rome. As to his character, although he was possessed of many moral virtues, his weak connivance at several vices and crimes of Nero, his vanity, his usuries and immense riches, showed that his boasted philosophy consisted more in theory than in practice. In compliance with the orders of Nero, he died by taking poison and opening his veins. The death of Lucan the poet, his nephew, was very similar : in obedi- ence to the same tyrannical orders, he also caused his veins to be opened. After having lost a great quantity of blood, finding his hands and feet grow cold, and the extremities of his body almost dead, whilst the parts nearer the heart still retained their natural warmth ; he recollected the description he had given in his Pharsalia of a death very like his own, and recited from it the following lines, which were his last words : Scinditur avulsus, nee, sicut vulnere, sanguis Emicuit lentus : ruptis cadit undiqu6 venis. ***** Pars ultima trunci Tradidit in letum vacuos vitalibus artus. At tumidus qua pulmo jacet, qua viscera fervent, Hseserunt ibi fata diu ; luctataque multum Hac cum parte viri vix omnia membra tulerunt. Lucani Pharsalia, 111. * * * * Asupder flies the man. No single wound the gaping rupture seems. Where trickling crimson wells in slender streams ; But from an opening horrible and wide, A thousand vessels pour the bursting tide. Soon from the lower parts the spirits fled. And motionless th' exhausted limbs lay dead. Not so the nobler regions, where the heart And heaving lungs their vital powers exert : There lingering late and long conflicting, life Rose against fate, and still maintained the strife. Driven out at length, unwillingly and slow, She left her mortal house, and sought the shades below. Rofwc. 496 NOTES. Many others, in e same corrupt age, either anticipated by a voluntary death, or consented to execute upon themselves the sentence of their con- demnation : and it is worthy of remark, that the frequency of suicide always bears a proportion to the depravity of the time and country in which it 'is practised, it being one of the basest and most heinous crimes that can be committed. One of the basest, because, far from being a mai'k of true forti- tude, it is, on the contrary, a sure mark of pusillanimity, and of a mind easily overcome by misfortune ; as Martial the poet has said : " Fortiter ille facit, qui miser esse potest — he is truly courageous, who can bear to be unfortunate." One of the most heinous, against God, whose sorereign do- minion over life and death it violates by a bold usurpation ; against society, which it unjustly deprives of its members ; and against the perpetrator himself, whom it consigns to everlasting misery, in exchange for a temporal evil : for such, and no other, must be the result of suicidej not only on the orinciples of divine revelation, but even on those of reason and natural light Whence Virgil, in his ^neid, speaking of the place of torments appointed ,in Tartarus for those who have committed suicide, very justly exclaims: * * * * * Quam vellent aethere in alto, Nunc et pauperiem et duros perferre labores \—jEneid, vi. The whole passage stands thus in Dryden : The next in place, and punishment, are they Who prodigally threw their souls away : Fools, who repining at their wretched state. And loathing anxious life, suborn'd their fate. With late repentance now they would retrieve The bodies they forsook, and wish to live ; Their pains and poverty desire to bear. To view the light of heaven, and breathe the vital air. But fate forbids ; the Stygian floods oppose. And, with nine circling streams, the captive soul enclose. Thus the guilt and folly of suicide were acknowledged by the wisest of Pagans ; and if the contrary opinion was more prevalent among them it must be ascribed to the depravity of the times, and to that almost universal darkness which an absurd polytheism had spread over the principles of morality; a circumstance this, which renders the admission of suicide among Christians still more unjustifiable. As to the equally criminal and brutal practice of duelhng, so common in our days, it was totally unknown to the civihzed nations of antiquity, and originated in the ferocity of those barbarians of Northern Europe, who, in the fifth century, overthrew the Koman empire. NOTE B.— PAGE 48 THE HISTORIAN JOSEPHUS. Nearly all that we relate concerning the Jewish war, being taken from Josephus, it will not be amiss to make some remarks respecting that great historiari ; referring, for a fuller account of his life, to his own writings Josephus was born of an illustrious Jewish family. From his youth he appeared still more remai-kable for the qualities of his mind than for'tlie NOTES. 497 nobleness of his extraction, and showed so accurate a knowledge of the Mosaic law, that, even at the age of fourteen years, he was consulted on important matters by the doctors themselves. Having, in course of time, acquired more and more credit and authority amon^ his countrymen, he made every effort to prevent them from rebelling against the Romans ; and, when he found his endeavors of no avail, he resolved at least to retard, as long as possible, the moment of their ruin. He was appointed by them governor of Gallilee, one of the Jewish provinces most exposed, from its position, to the attacks of the enemy. Notwithstanding many obstacles, Josephus, by his ability, prudence and firmness, kept that province in good order for some time ; but the approach of a powerful army commanded" by Vespasian, compelled him to retire into Jotapat, the best fortified town in the country. Though pursued and be- sieged by the Romans, he defended the town, with astonishing skill and valor during forty-seven days, at the end of which, Jotapat was taken by surprise, and its inhabitants were put to the sword, with the exception of some hundred women and children. Josephus took refuge in a deep cavern, where he concealed himself with forty of his soldiers. Three days after, the place of his retreat having been discovered by the conquerors, he would have immediately intrusted himself to the generosity of Vespasian, had he not been prevented from surrendering by the threats of his companions These furious men, to avoid falling into the hands of a victorious enemy resolved to kill themselves with their own swords ; Josephus prevailed on them rather to die by the hands of others, proposing to them to decide by lot who should be first killed by his companion, who should follow next, and so on to tlie last : a proposal, after all, not less exceptionable than their first design. They fohowed it however, till Josephus, most fortunately, remained, with only one man, whom he persuaded to surrender with him to the Romans ; (see Josephus himself, De Bello Judaico, lib. iii, c. 7 and 8.) He was kindly treated by Vespasian, and still more so by Titus, who had conceived a great esteem for his merit. He afterwards followed this prince to the siege of Jerusalem, where he repeatedly exhorted his countrymen to imitate his example, and to deserve the clemency of the Romans by an entire submission ; but, far from being successful in the attempt, he was insulted, and, on one occasion even wounded; he would have been either tilain or taken prisoner, had not Titus speedily sent a body of soldiers to his assistance, who succeeded in carrying him back to the camp. After the destruction of Jerusalem, he went with the same prince to Rome, where he continued to be much honored by him and his father Vespasian.^ It was during his residence in Rome, that Josephus finished his many historical works, which display a talent for narrative, a warmth of imagina- tion and a beauty of styde, that have gained for him the surname of the Grecian Livxj. The most celebrated of his writings is the "History of the Jewish War," in seven books. It obtained the unquaUfied approbation of Vespasian, Titus and King Agrippa, who were all perfectly acquainted with the facts there mentioned. Indeed nothing is wanting to render that work hoth highly interesting and credible. It is the histoiy of a war unparalleled in the annals of nations' a narrative of notorious as well as extraordinary events, written by one who had been an eye-witness, and even one of the chief actors in them : a narrative published at a time, when it could have been easily contradicted by a thousand other witnesses, had it been deemed at variance with facts—far from heing thus contradicted, it met with universal admiration and praise. It is a historj^, the author of which Almighty God saved by a special pro- tection from innumerable dangers, that we might have in him an unexcep- tionable witness of the entire fulfilment of the divine phophecies concerning 42* 498 NOTES. the temple cand city of Jcruscalem. In a word, it is botli an authentic and admirable record, which, though very favorable to the cause of Christianity, cannot in the least be suspected of partiality for the Christians, since the writer was not a Christian, but a Jew constantly attached to his religion, his nation and his country. NOTE C— P A G E 94. NUMBER OF MARTYRS DURING THE GENERAL PERSECUTIONS OF THE • CHURCH. What we have related of the persecutions of the church during the first ages, plainly shows that the multitude of those who were put to death for the cause of the Christian faith, was immense. Still Gibbon, in his ' i)e- cline and fall of the Roman Empire,' ch. xvi, maintains that the number of martyrs was not considerable, nor their courage astonishing. The follow- ing additional quotations from ancient sources, wall show at once, it is hoped, the falsity of his assertions, and the accuracy of our statement. For tiie sake of brevity, we shall confine our remarks to the first, fifth and tenth persecutions. For the first persecution, besides Tertullian and other ecclesiastical writers, we have the grave and contemporary pagan historian Tacitus, who writes thus : " An immense multitude (multitiido ingeiis) of Christians were condemned, not, indeed, upon evidence of their having set the city (of Rome) on fire, but rather on account of the hatred of the whole human race. To their sufferings Nero added mockery and derision. Some were covered with the skins of wild beasts, to make dogs devour them ; others were cru- cified ; and many, covered over with inflammable matter, w^ere lighted up, when the day declined, to serve as torches during the night." (Tacit Annal., lib. xv, n. 44.) With regard to the fifth persecution (which Gibbon modestly calls a mitigated one), merely to mention the martyrs of Lyons ; Ado of Vienna says in his martyrology (28th of June), tliat St. Irenseus, bishop of that city, suffered martyrdom with an exceedingly great multitude. An ancient epitaph, inscribed on a curious mosaic pavement in the great church of St. Irenaeus at Lyons, says that the number of the martyrs who died with him, amounted to the number of nineteen thousand, besides women and children St. Gregory of Tours writes that St. Irenseus had, in a very short time, converted to the Christian faith nearly the whole city of Lyons, and that with him were butchered almost all the Christians of that populous town; in so much that streams of blood flowed through the streets : Tanta multi- tudo Ckristianorum jngiilata est, ut per plateas flumina currerent de sanguine. Christiano; {Hist. Franc, lib. i. c. 29.) St. Eucherius writes on the mar- tyrs of Lyons in the like manner; and Eusebius, speaking in more general terms of the same persecution, says : "When Severus raised a persecution against the Church, there were illustrious testimonies given by the comba- tants of religion in the various churches every where;'' (Eccl. Hist. lib. vi c. 1.) So much for the mitigated persecution of Septimius Severus. The same Eusebius relates more at large the tenth pers-ecution, the atrocities of which he had witnessed with his own eyes. To the texts and facts which we have quoted from him, page 94, we will subjoin the following, also taken from his Ecclesiastical History, booJcYIlI, according to the English edit. Philad. 1834. NOTES. 4S9 Ch. 6. "Innumerable multitudes were imprisoned in every place, and (he dungeons formerly destined for murderers and the vilest criminals, were then filled wi^h bishops, and presbyters (priests), and deacons, readers and exorcists ; so that there was no room left for those condemned for crimes. But, when the former edict was followed by another, in which it was ordered that the prisoners should be permitted to have their liberty if they sacrificed, but persistins:, tliev should be punished with the most excruciating tortures, who could tell the numoer of those martyrs in every province, and particu- larly in Mauritania, Thebais and Egypt, that suffered death for their religion? " Ch. 8. " In Egypt, thousands, both men and women, and children, de- spising the present life for the sake of our Saviour's doctrine, submitted to death m various shapes. Some, after being tortured with scrapings and the rack, and the most dreadful scourgings, and other innumerable agonies, which one might shudder to hear, were finally committed to the flames ; some were plunged and drowned in the sea; others voluntarily offered their own heads to the executioners ; others died in the midst of their torments, some wasted away by famine, and others again fixed to the cross. Some, indeed, were executed as malefactors usually were ; others, more cruelly, were nailed with the head downwards, and kept alive until they were de- stroyed by starving on the cross itself." Ch. 9. " But it would exceed all power of detail to give an idea of the sufferings and tortures which the Martyrs of Thebais endured And all these things done not only for a few days, or some time, but for a series of whole years. At one time, ten or more ; at another, more than twenty ; at another time, not less than thirty, and even sixty; and again, at another time, a hundred men with their wives and little children were slain in one day, whilst they were condemned to various and varied punishments. We ourselves have observed, when on the spot, many crowded together in one day, some suffering decapitation, some the torments of flames ; so that the murderous weapon was completely blunted, and having lost its edge, broke to pieces; and the executioners themselves, wearied with slaughter, were obliged to relieve one another. Then, also, we were witnesses to the most admirable ardor of mind, and the truly divine energy and alacrity of those that believed in Christ. For, as soon as the sentence was pronounced against the first, others rushed forward from other parts to the tribunal before the judge, and, most indifferent to the dreadful and multiform tor- tures that awaited them, openly declared that they were Christians." Ch. 12. "In Pontus and other countries of Asia, the martyrs endured torments that are horrible to relate. Some had their fingers pierced with sharp reeds thrust under their nails. Others were roasted by masses of melted lead. . . . Some were suspended by the feet, and a little raised from the ground with their heads downward, were suffocated with the ascending smoke of a gentle fire kindled below. . . .Others were roasted on grates of fire, not to kill immediately, but torture them with a lingering punishment .... It is impossible to tell the great and incalculable number of those that had their right eye dug out with the sword, and then seared with a red hot iron ; those too, whose left foot was maimed with a searing iron ; after these, those who in different provinces were condemned to the copper mines, not 80 much for the service, as for the contumely and misery they should en- dure. Many, also, endured conflicts of other kinds, which it wouJd be impossible to detail ; for their noble fortitude surpasses all power of descrip- tion. In this, the magnanimous confessors of Christ that shone conspicuous throughout the whole world, e^-ery where struck the beholders with aston- ishment, and presented the obvious proofs of our Saviour's divine interjiosi- tion in their own persons." 500 NOTES. Is not all this more than sufficient to overthrow at once the whole system of Gibbon concerning the Christian martyrs ? The sceptical autlior has himself perceived it very well; and hence his anger against Eusebius. Lactantius has fewer words, but is not less positive than Eusebius on the excessive cruelties and ravages of the persecution of Diocletian. " Though I had," says he, " a hundred mouths and tongues, with an iron breast, it v/ould be impossible for me to describe the various and horrid tortures that were inflicted on the guiltless Christians, throughout the provinces of the empire." (De Morte persec. n. xvr.j Sulpicius Severus, who lived in the same century, though a little later, expresses himself in the same manner on the present subject. The follow- ing are his words, in the 2d book of his Hist. Sacr. : "Under the empire of Diocletian and Maximian, a most rigorous persecution arose, which made frightful ravages in the church for ten years in succession. During thai period, nearly the whole world was stained with the blood of the holy mar- tyrs. Never was the earth more depopulated by any war, than by this persecution ; nor did the church ever obtain a greater triumph, than when it could not be conquered by a continual slaughter which lasted ten years." Diocletiano et Maximiano imperantibus, acerbissima persecutio exorta, qua per decern continuos annos plebem Dei depopulata est. Qud tempestate omnis fere sacro marUjrum cruore orbis infectus est. . . Nullis umquam magis bellis mundus exhaustus est : negue majore unquam triumpho vidmus, quam quiim decern annorum stragibus vinci non potuimus. There is yet extant a medal of Diocletian with this inscription: "The name of Christians being annihilated ;" Nomine Christianorum deleio. This indeed was asserting what had never happened ; still, what an immense quantity of blood must have been shed, to make the persecutors believe that they had obliterated the Christian name, and destroyed a religion which filled the whole empire ! After such unexceptionable testimonies, which certainly suppose the number of martyrs to have amounted to millions, how ridiculous and absurd must the assertions of Gibbon appear, when, besides frequently contradict- ing himself, he maintains : first, that there were not more than fifteen hun dred or two thousand martyrs in the persecution of Diocletian ; secondly, that their sufferings ought to be ascribed to a cause different from that of religion, and their fortitude to mere human motives, such as pride, ambition and desire of glory ; thirdly, that their tortures only existed in the imagina- tion of the monks of latter ages! Indeed, was Gibbon serious, when writing these things, or did he not rather intend to trifle with his readers ? In how deceitful and shameful a manner does he endeavor to answer and oppose the most authentic monuments of antiquity ! 1st. He conceals, omits, alters, or calls in question the strongest passages of ancient historians, which are contrary to his system ; a commodious way indeed to get rid of the most forcible proofs, when they cannot be met with solid argument! 2d He impeaches the veracity, or at least the accuracy of Tacitus in the passage above quoted, under the pretence that Tacitus had not seen what ne relates : as if ocular demonstration were the only means of acquiring the knowledge of facts, and as if Tacitus could not be perfectly acquainted with an event quite notorious in its nature, which happened in Rome where he vwote his Annals, and a few years only before he began to waite ! But, if the principle be true, that the testimony of the eyes is requisite to know and sm'ely transmit historical events, what credit, we ask, can possibly be given to any part of Gibbon's work, since the facts there recorded, are sup- I>osed to have happened many centuries before Gibbon was born ? What right has an inconsistent and infidel author to claim the least reliance on NOTES. 501 his word, whilst he himself so boldly discredits the testimony of a grave, judicious and renowned historian? 3d. He appeals to the well known moderation of Trajan, Marcus Aurelius, and other such princes, to exculpate thera from the guilt of having been persecutors. Some of those emperors, we admit, did not enact laws against Christianity; but they at least suffered the ancient laws to be executed and themselves sometimes carried on the persecution, as we learn from Eusebius {Ecd. Hist. lib. in, iv and v), St. Justin and Meliton, (in their Apolog.), and Pliny the younger {Epist ad Traj.) Moreover, what does their supposed moderation prove against the violence of the persecutions raised by Nero.. Septimius, and others ? 4th. Gibbon insists on the small number of Christians who were juridi- cally condemned. Small it may have been, but how many, how verj' many more perished every where, without the formality of a judicial sen- tence, as ancient historians testify ! 5. He emphatically adduces a sentence of Origen, which says tliat the number of maj-tyrs was inconsiderable ( Contra Celsum, lib. iii, n, 8). But ho ought to have added likewise what comes next in Crimen, and shows his true meaning, viz. that there always remained more Christians alive, than had perished during the persecution, "God being unwilling," says he, "that the Christian society should be destroyed." Hence the small num- ber of martyrs spoken of by this Father, is to be understood relatively tc the number of the survivors ; which does not favor the system of Gibbon, nor contradict our statement; the less so, as Origen wrote this before the per- secutions ofDecius, Valerian and Diocletian, the most cruel and bloody of all. 6th. Eusebius positively testifies that he was an eye-witness to tho multitude, the sufferings, and the constancy of the martyrs of Thebais and Egypt; * Gibbon calls the fact in question— which of the two ought to be believed? • * Gibbon, to elude the difficulty, contents himself with saying that the terra used by Eusebius may sieaking. The candid reader v.-ill decide on the meaning of the author. — In tlie first, cpeaking of the statue erected in Ccesarea Philippi to our Saviour by the woman men- tioned in the Gospel, he says : "Euuvt 61 Kal eii //u«f, wf Ka\ oxLei Mansit porro (the statue) ad nostra us- K n ~ • T ' ' , V ~ nue tempora: nosque adeo urbem illam r <" V fl ' , r. X ^ mgressi, 7psa»n conspeximus JNec vero mi- it6\ei. iS.ai davjiao-Tov ov6iv rovg ira- raiidum est Gentiles i Servatore nostro \ai t^ iQvwv evepyerriOivTas npog rov beneficiis affectos hsc priesUiisse ; cdm cl SwrTjpo? hfi^v, ravra Tr£TToir)Kevar ore Apostoloruni Petri ac Pauh, Christique ip ~ 5 A ,N . ~ ^ ' jr sius picias nna'i(Taj.i£v. — JL. VII cap. 18. 502 NOTES. 7 In order to weaken the overwlielming authority of the same Eusebius, and also of Lactantius, the English sophist calls the former a courtier, and the latter a rhetorician ; as if rhetoric or the court had any thing to do with the present subject, and could have deprived these illustrious writers of their ears, eyes, learning and judgment. Assuredly if such angry and preposterous accusations be once admit- ted, there is at once an end of historical knowledge. The truth is, that Gibbon, being an enemy to the Church of Christ, chose rather to fall into absurdities, than X3ermit her cxuietly^to enjoy the lustre thrown around her by the multitude and constancy of her martyrs. Many other reprehensible assertions against the Christian Religion, her tenets andher ministers, are to be found in the work of Gribbon: although they are equally destitute of proof, it is not our object here to discuss them. We have said enough to show that this author is, at least in what regards Christianity unworthy of credit, and a real infidel, who covers, but cannot conceal Ms hatred against our holy religion with the veil of affected moderation and learning. Hence it it is most deplorable, that a work so well calculated to instil the poison of scepticism and infidelity, should be so much read, praised and reccommended in Christian and enlightened countries. Will any literary advantage, derived from some beauties of style, ever compensate so pernicious a result ? NOTE D.— P A G E 111 ^ ATTEMPT OF THE EMPEROR JULIAN TO REBUILD THE TEMPLE OF JERUSALEM. That this attempt entirely failed, and that its failure was not a natural event, is so certain, and so well proved, that it can be denied only by one who is ready to deny every thing. In the first place, the fact is related by a great number of contemporary writers, viz : St. Gregory Nazianzen, in the year immediately following the event, (Oral. v. contr. Julian.) \ St. John Chrysostom, in several parts of his works, especially his first, fifth and six Discourses on the Jews, where he appeals to eye-witnesses yet living; St. Ambrose, in his 40th Epistle, written a. d. 8SS, to the emperor Theodo- sius; Rufinus, in his Eccles. Hist. (6. i. c. 87, etc.); Philostorgiug, the Arian, (6. vir, c. 14) ; Theodoret, the celebrated bishop of Cyre, (b. iii, c. 20) ; Socrates, {b. in, c. 20) ; Sozomen, who says that many were still alive who had seen the splendid prodigy, {h. v, c. 22) ; etc. This unanimous testimony of the Ecclesiastical historians is* corroborated by that of the Jews and gentiles. Rabbins Gans-Zemach and Gedaliah relate the fact with its principal circumstances ; the latter especially, is clear, positive, and the more deserving of credit, as he transcribed what he wrote from the annals of his nation. Libanius, a friend and perpetual admirer of JuHan, speaks in two places of earthquakes and dreadful acci- dents which had lately happened in Palestine. Juhan himself, in one of The second passage is still mure to the point: relating the sufferings of certain martyrs in Phccnicia, Eusebius uses tlie following words : . . . . Oli yiyvonivoi^ Kal avToX Quae cum gcrerentur, rws i;)si pwse^ifoj ' ' ^ • ' , aaeramits: vdn et divinani potentiam her- ^pn^EP, o-r,viKa Tov jiaprvpivusvov^ ^^^^^^.^ ^^^^^.^ j^^^^ Christi, cui tunc mar i^MTupos rjjiMf avTOv Si) Iriaov A.pi(TTOv t\TOS testimonium perhibebant, pnesenttnn rriv Beiav Svvajiiv h-L-apovaav, tvapycog et semetipsam manifest^ martyribus cshi- re avTijv roTs fidorvciv i-XLSeiKvvcrav bcniem pc?-spca;i,?7iMS {ffro|C»)o-a/(£j/. — Lib. VIII. cap. 7 NOTES. 503 Ilia letters, confesses that he attempted to raise the Temple of the Jews from its ruins, and cannot help insinuating the insurmountable obstacles he met with, which obliged him to give up the enterprise. Above all, we have the express testimony of Ammianus Marcellinus, another heathen and contemporary author, who writes thus in the 23d book of his History/. " Whilst Al)rpius, assisted by the governor of the pro- vince, urged with vigor and diligence the execution of the work, fearful balls of fire frequently breaking out near the foundations, several times burned or scorched the workmen, and rendered the place inaccessible. The terrible element continuing in this manner ohstinaiehj to repel every elfort, the undertaking was abandoned." Cum itaque rei fortiter instaret Alypius, juvaretque provinciae rector, metuendi globi flammarum propfe fundamenta crebris assultibus erumpentes fecere locum, exustis aliquoties operantibus, inaccessum; hocque modo elemento destinatiiis repellente, ces- savit inceptum. — Amm. lib. xxiii, c. 1. To such a mass of evidence what can be opposed, and what is really opposed by Gibbon and other infidels? Do they adduce against the fact just related, any thing, I do not say evident, but even plausible ; for in- stance, the contradictory statement of some historians worthy of credit? By no means ; they merely appeal to the silence of some ancient authors who thought it unnecessary to mention the wonderful event. But, when was it ever admitted that the silence of a few, and even of many, could destroy or even weaken the positive asseveration of others among whom collusion was utterly impossible, of numerous and learned, contemporary and unexceptionable vouchers? What can we believe in the annals of nations, in the transactions of human life, in courts of judicature, etc. if in order to obtain sufficient evidence of a fact, the express attestation of innu merable persons is required? This is certainly a strange rule of criticism. Nor is there less fallacy and absurdity in the atfected doubts of our modern infidels, in their usual resource of a may-be or perhaps, in tlieir vague charges of exaggeration, fanaticism, Christian credulity, and the like : — what have such charges to do with an event equally important and noto- rious, with a fact openly proclaimed and recorded by a multitude of wri- ters, at a time when innumerable witnesses were still alive, and when, had it not really taken place, it would have been related by none, by none have been believed? ' Let us then conclude, with the learned Warburton, in his dissertation oi> tliis subject, that the defeat of Julian's attempt by fire and earthquakes, stands forth in a full blaze of evidence, and is as incontestable as any event mentioned in history. Either it must be admitted, or we must fall into the most extravagant scepticism, and reject altogether the exploits and con- quests of Alexander, Julius Caesar, Charlemagne, etc., which indeed are not so well substantiated as the event in question. But if, admitting the existence of the fact, infidels deny, or like the same Gibbon, call in question its being a real miracle, tliis new paradox is as easily refuted as the former. For it is impossible that any sincere mind should not perceive a supernatural intervention of God, and a deroga- tion from the ordinary laws of this visible world, in the event now before us, whether we consider it in its moral or in its physical circumstances In the first place, it is true that earthquakes and the eruption of volcanic fire are commonly the mere consequences of the ordinary laws of nature, and do not, of themselves, suppose or demonstrate any particular design of the providence of God. But, when these various phenomena come all together and unexpectedly, just at the moment in which a great and reli- gious object is to be obtained, or an impious attempt to be defeated, there can be no doubt that they are a special manifestation of tlie divine will and 504 NOTES. power, expressly made by the Almighty for the above purposes. To deny this, would be to deny the wisdom and providence of God in the moral government of the world, and, with equal impiety and absurdity, to substi- tute in their stead a ridiculous chance or a blind necessity. These evident truths being presupposed, let us examine the peculiar ten- dency and circumstances of Julian's exertions towards the rebuilding of the Jewish Temple. Since its irreparable and entire overthrow had been fore- told botli in the Old and New Testament, Julian, by undertaking to rebuild it, bade defiance to Heaven itself, and was inclined, could he once succeed, to bring the charge of falsehood and imposture on those sacred prophecies. If then Almighty God, just at the moment when the intended work was to be begun, pi evented it by awful earthquakes and eruptions of fire, though these effects might, to some, appear natural in themselves, who can doubt but that so singular a concurrence of the malicious attempt and tlie obsta- cles opposed to it, should be attributed to a supernatural intervention ? What sincere mind will not, on beholding the Christian religion, as it were, pro- tected by the very elements, conclude that the Sovereign Lord of nature is also the founder and preserver of Christianity? Moreover, all the physical circumstances which accompanied the event, concurred to prove it a real and most splendid miracle. Independently of the fact that there had never been a volcano in Palestine, we learn from Ammianus Marcellinus that tlie balls of fire came out of tlie eai'th near the foundations of the Temple— at repeated times— with a sort of deliberate intention to subdue the persevering obstinacy of the workmen, and, after consuming several of them, rendered the place inaccessible. According to Rabbin Gedaliah, a great earthquake took place, and a terrible fire melted the iron instruments, and burned a great number of Jews. Accord- ing to Rufinus and Theodoret, porticos under which the workmen retired, fell by the violence of the earthquake, and crushed them to death, whilst others were devoured by fire on the site of the Temple. According to St. Gregory Nazianzen, Socrates, Sozomen, etc. a brilliant cross appeared in the sky, and smaller crosses were imprinted on the garments of the specta- tors, etc. Who will not acknowledge in all this something manifestly above the laws of nature? Who can explain, by those laws, why the balls of fire burst forth from the foundations, at the very moment »when the work was begun, and whenever it was resumed; why the destructive element di- rected its whole fury against the workmen and the Jews, and not against other persons; and why it did not cease its attacks, until the enterprise was entirely abandoned? How did it happen that the shaking of the earth overthrew the porticos, where many workmen were assembled, and not other buildings in the city ? Why no fissures and chasms were left in the ground, like those formed by natural earthquakes and volcanoes? Why those crosses, great and small, etc. etc.? Did nature ever produce efi"ects like these? Was not the finger of God visible in every circumstance of this awful event; and does not the man who yoluntarily shuts his eyes against such light, deserve to be abandoned with the Apostate Julian to his own obduracy, as to an equally just and rigorous punishment ? NOTES. 505 NOTE E.— PAGE 165 Mahomet's pretended miracles. Although Mahomet, on several occasions, disclaimed the power of W'orking miracles, still he maintained that Almighty did wonderful things m his favor, and his followers also ascribe to him a great number of prodi- gies of the most extraordinary nature; for instance, that the moon was divided into two parts, one of which came down into the sleeve of their prophet, by whom it was sent back to heaven ; — that fountains sprung forth from his fingers, &c.; but, who does not see that all these things are mere stories, unworthy of having the God of majesty for their author, besides being totally unsupported by credible testimonies or by any proof whatever? For, they were either blindly adopted upon the bare word of Mahomet, or forged only after his death ; most of them not being found even in the Koran, but in the Sonna, a fabulous and ridiculous record of somewhat later date, which holds among the Mussulmans the same stand • ing that the Talmud holds among the Jews. The most famous of those prodigies is the voya^^e of Mahomet to the highest heaven. Of this he continually boasted; this he adduced as the strongest proof of his favor with God, and, after his example, several Arabian authors relate it with the utmost gravity. They say that, during a certain night, the wonderful mare Al-Borak upon which the ancient prophets usually rode, transported Mahomet from Mecca to Jerusalem, whence he was, by the help of the Archangel Gabriel and of a ladder of light, taken up, through an immense distance, to the summit of heaven, before the throne of the Almighty, there to receive his instructions from God himself. Most admirable were the things which he saw in his journey thither, and on his way back ; among others ; 1st, the stars as big as the mountains of Arabia, and fastened to the first heaven by golden chains, (which shows, by the by, how learned a scholar and astro- nomer Mahomet was!) 2d, a cock, whose head reached the second heaven, though distant from the first where the cock stood, about ten or twelve times the distance from the moon to the earth ; 3d, an angel so tall and large, that it would have taken seventy thousand days to walk from one of his eyes to the other; 4th, another angel who had seventy thousand heads, each' head having seventy thousand faces ; each face, seventy thousand mouths ; each) mouth, seventy thousand tongues ; and each tongue being able to speaAc^seyenty thousand languages, of which he made use to praise Almighty God, etc. Mahomet returned in the same manner, and with the same rapidity in which he had gone to heaven, the whole voyage having been completed in the short space of a few hours. (See Umvers. Hist. composed by a body of learned Englishmen, Paris edit. 1782, vol. xlt, pp. 92 — IIG, where are found references to numberless writers, Abulicda, Gagnier, Prideaux, etc. — Anquetil, Precis de VHistoire Univers., vol. iv. in Svo.pp. 249—253). Tales, not only so unworthy in every respect of being compared with the miracles of Christ and his disciples, but even so ridiculous and absurd, found admirers among the enthusiastic Arabs, Stilly it must be observed that they were not believed b}'- all the Mahometans ; nor did the followers of Mahomet support their preaching by the authority of his pretended mira- cles, but by force of arms. The use of their swords, aided on one side by Ihe impulse of ambition, corrupt nature and fanaticism, on the other, by 43 506 NOTES. the weakness of the Greek and Persian empires at that period, was the real and only cause of the rapid progress of their religion. (See again Uiiivers. Hist, same vol. xli, pp. 45, 46 : — Annales du moyen age, vol. iv, last pages; — Leheau, Hist, du JBas Empire, b. 58, n. 31, 32; Bergier, Diction, de thiol, art, Mahometisme) . As to the Koran, which the Mussulmans give also as a proof of the divine mission of their prophet, we have already observed that, with the exception of a glowing style and some beautiful moral maxims, it is, ac cording to all persons of good sense, nothing but a miserable rhapsody The Mahometan doctors themselves confess that it is full of pei*plexing difficulties and contradictions, which they endeavor to reconcile by admit ting a distinction between its v-ai-ious articles, some, they say, being abro- gatea, and some being destined to abrogate the others; but, unfortunately for their purpose, the abrogating articles, instead of being, as the}'' certamly ought to be, later, are on the contrary more ancient than those to be abro- gated. NOTE F.— PAGE 183. ANSWER OF POPE ZACHARY TO A CONSULTATION OF THE FRENCH. By some authors and critics of later times (Le Cointe, Ann. Francor.; — Feller, art. Childeric III ; — Bdraut-Bercastel, ad. ami. 752, etc.), the fact of Pope Zachary being consulted about the accession of Pepin, has been called in question, but we think without sufficient reason. It is thus rela- ted by Eginhard, an almost contemporary writer: "Burcard (a bishop) and Fulrad (first chaplain of the palace), were sent to Rome, for the pur- pose of consulting Pope Zachary concerning the kings who were then in France, and who, having merely the name of kings, did not enjoy any por- tion of the royal power. The answer was : ' It were better that he should be king, in whom the sovereign authority resided.' — Missi sunt Burcardug et Folradus Roman ad Zachariam, ut consulerent Pontificem de causa regum qui illo tempore fuerunt in Francia, qui nomen tantum regis, sed nullam potestatum regiam habuerunt; secutum est responsum: meliius esse ilium regem, apud quern summa potestatis consisteret." Eginhard. Annal. Franc. The same is recorded in substance by the authors of many annals of those times, Fuld., Metens., etc.; by the continuator of Fredegaire and others (apvd Duchesne, vol. i. pp. 773, 796). From these it plainly appears that the fact in question is expressly asserted by a great number of contem- porary or nearly contemporary writers. To reject the unanimous testi- mony of so many and so respectable annalists, seems to be rather unreason- able criticism,, there being no certain proof of their having wanted either sincerity or correct information on that point. Tliis being presupposed, it would be still more unjust to blame the answer of Pope Zachary. In fact, no one can fairly doubt that, among the northern nations of Europe, the crovvm was originally elective, as Robert- son has well proved in his preliminary discourse" on the history of Scotland. It had indeed become hereditary among the French, owing to the uncom- mon ability of their fii-st leaaers ; but, since the last kings of the family of Clovis had, by their indolence and incapacity, brought contempt upon them- selves, it was natural to expect that the French lords, in order to procure a xyorthy sovereign to the nation, would revive the ancient mode of succes- sion to the throne. NOTES. 507 On the other hand, the exercise of the royal authority had, for a long scries of years, entirely devolved on the French dukes of Pepin's family : they alone carried the whole burden and discharged all the duties of sove- reignty at home and abroad; whereas the last Merovingian kings had accustomed themselves, generally speaking, to be satisfied with the easier duty of managing their private household. This was an excellent reason for the French to resume, under these circumstances, the ancient mode of electing their sovereigns, which had not yet suffered a very long interruption, and, by a very proper use of their right, to confer the roy^ title and prerogatives on such persons among them as exercised the royal power with so much glory and utility for the state. Since, moreover, the whole nation professed an explicit attachment and respect for the Apostolic See, it was likewise the duty and the interest of Pepin to have his election confirmed by the Pope. Zachar}', in his answer, did not endanger the laws of wisdom and justice. In declaring that it was better to confer the title of king on that person who was already in possession of the sovereign authority, he merely ex- pressed a fact and a maxim which, far from disturbing the good order of the state, tended to re-establish it by the adoption of a measure equedly prudent and decisive : "melius esse ilium (vocari) regem, apud quern summa potestatis consisteret." Had the decision of the Pope and the conduct of Pepin left every thing as before, there would have remained in France, two sovereigns, the one nominal, the other real, contrary to the fundamental laws of that kingdom and to the just wishes of the nation. NOTE G. — PAGE 185. TEMPORAL DOMINION OF THE POPE. Among the different temporal sovereignties which exist in the world, there is none so evidently irreproachable in its origin and formation, as that of the Pope. Here we see neither artful intrigues, nor sedition and revolt, nor unjust attacks and usurpation ; but we behold the liberality of Chris- tian kings and emperors, united with a series of singula.r events, whose coincidence led the way to the addition of temporal power to the spiritual authority which the Sovereign Pontiff had always exercised. It is a fact of public notoriety, and placed beyond the possibility of a doubt, that the Popes, for many years, and especially in the first part of the eighth century, made every exertion to preserve to the court of Con- stantinople its possessions in the West, (see Anastasius, in Pap. Greg. II. et Steph. 11; Thomassin. Biscipl. de VEgl. pari iii, book i, c. 29, vol. III, pp. 199, et scq.) They incessantly endeavored, by the exercise of their great influence, to maintain the Italians in their allegiance to the Greek emperors, and, by embassies and entreaties, to procure irom the Greek emperors the assistance which the Italians needed in order to repel the repeated attacks of the Lombards. But those blind and wicked princes, instead of affording the relief so much desired, rather increased the public misery by tyranny and oppression. Thus, finding implacable enemies both in the barbarians and in_ their own sovereigns, the people, driven almost to despair, began to sigh ardently after a new and better order of things. The eyes of all were turned to- wards the Pope, as their only refuge and the common father of all in dis- tress. In this state cf desolation, the Sovereign Pontiffs, unable any longer 608 NOTES. to resist the eargerness of multitudes flying into their arms for protectioft and refuge, and destitute of every other means, applied to the French, who alone were both willing and able to defend them against the Lombards. The sequel is known; and we shall not repeat here what Pepin and Charlemagne did for the people of Rome, and especially for the Pope with regard to^his temporal dominion ; but we will ask, what can we find to censure either in the conduct of the French monarch, or in that of the Roman people? It is a principle laid down by civilians, and founded on the law of nations, that he who conquers a country in a just war not under- taken for the former possessors nor in union with them, is not bound to restore to them what they would not, or could not, protect and secure. Such exactly was the case with Italy at that time. The Greeks had lost their right to their possessions in that country, by suffering them to be taken or laid waste by the Lombards, without sending succor to defend and pro- tect them. Those countries, therefore, by the claim of conquest in a just war, belonged to Pepin and Charlemagne, who bestowed them on the Popes. On the other hand, the Roman people, abandoned to barbarians, had a right, when the Greeks refused to afford them relief, to seek it from others, and form themselves into a new form of government. This they did, by choosing, under the protection of the French, to be governed bj him vvho, besides being the common father of the faithful, had been their only support in their distress. "II n'y a rien," says Count de Maistre, "de si dvidemment juste dans son origine que cette souverainet^ extraordinaire. L'incapacit^, la bas- sesse, la fgrocit^ des souverains qui la prdc^d^rent; I'insupportable tyran- nic exercde sur les biens, les personnes et la conscience des peuples ; I'aban- don formel de ces memes peuples livrds sans defense a d'impitoyables bar- bares; le cri de I'occident qui abdique I'ancien maitre; la nouvelle souve- rainet^ qui s'^l^ve, s'avance et se substitue a I'ancienne sans secousse, sans r^volte, sans effusion de sang, pouss^e par une force cachde, inexplicable, invincible, et jurant foi et fiddlit^ jusqu'au dernier instant a la faible et mdprisable puissance qu'elle allait remplacer; le droit de conqucte enfin, obtenu, et solennellement c6de par I'un des plus grands hommes qui aient existd, par un homme si grand que la grandeur a pdndtr^ son nom, et que. la voix du genre humain I'a proclamd grandeur au lieu de grand : tels sont les litres des Papes, et I'histoire ne prdsente rien de semblable." (Du Pape, vol. I, liv. ii, ch. vi). This truth is expressed in a recent history of the Greek empire, with the same elegance, perspicuity and energy of style, as follows: "A quel titre Copronyme revendiquait-il une souverainet^ abandonn^e, ou quels droits pr6tendait-il conserver sur des peuples d^laiss^s, qui d^s long- temps ne connaissaient plus I'autoritd impdriale ni par sa protection ni par ses bienfaits? Les empereurs avaient abandonne Rome aux barbares ; et qui I'avait d6fendue, qui I'avait sauv^e ? L'histoire nomme Ldon, Gr^goire, ou quelqu'autre de leurs successeurs ; et les peuples avaient reconnu pour maitres ceux qui s'dtaient montres leurs pferes. La puissance des Papes 6tait un fait, quand P^pin la reconnut comme un droit; et jamais souve- rainetd n'eut une origine plus juste et plus sainte." (Hist, du Bas-Evip, Paris, 1S3S. vol. i, pp. 272, 273.) NOTES. 509 NOTE H.— PAGE 251. POPKS OF THE MIDDLE AGES. Nothing in the history of the middle ages has been more frequently miorepresentcd and more grossly calumniated, yet nothing is more worthy of admiration, than the conduct of the Popes in the long struggle whicn they maintained against the depravity and tyranny of princes, in defence of religion and social order. It was truly the struggle of virtue against vice, ■ of civilization against barbarism, of Christianity against the powers of dark- ness. At that time, whether the evil was owing to the invasions of new barbarians, to the feudal system, or to other causes ; national and civil wara scarcely ceased one moment to lay waste the whole face of Europe. Nations oppressed by their sovereigns had no other resource than the pro- tection of the Pope, and sovereigns who wished to act as tyrants, had no other check than his authority, which they generally acknowledged, not only in spiritual, but also in temporal concerns. The Pope then, in his proceed- ings against several emperors of Germany and some other princes, besides acting conformably to the common jurisprudence of those times, merely did what the state of society and the circumstances in which he was placed, evidently required of him as the head of the Chri^ian family, and the common father of all the faithful. The better to understand this, we should revert to the epoch in which these important transactions took place. At a time when the nations of Europe closely adhered to the ancient faith, and preferred it to every thing else, the profession of Cliristianity and submission to the Roman Church were conditions absolutely requisite in sovereigns, to exact and enforce obedience from their sut)jects. If a prince happened to revolt openly against the Catholic religion, or to incur, by his crimes, the penalty of ex- communication, it was the prevailing opinion that the oath of allegiance taken to him was no longer binding, since he had ceased to be the reli- gious prince whom the nation had intended to acknowledge for its mon- arch.* "Thus," says Schlegel, " we hear the Saxons declare to the empe- ror Henry IV, that, the Christian name bein^ profaned by him, they were unwilling to disgrace themselves by having intercourse with a prince who insulted and despised the religion of Christ; and, since they had sworn fealty to him, on condition that he should reign for the edification and not for the destruction of the Church, were he to infringe this duty, they would think themselves no longer bound by their oath of allegiance to him. Shortly after, the same Saxons wrote to the Pope, to lay before his tribunal both their grievances and the crimes of Henry, and concluded their letter * lliis is very well explained by Fenclon, who says: " Sensim Calholicarum gentium hoBC fiiit sententia animis altfi iinpiessa, scilicet, supremam potestateni comuiitli non posse nisi priticipi Catholico, eamque esse legem sivc conditionein appositam populoe inter et principeni, ut populi principi fideles parcrent, mod6 princeps ipse Catliolicte reli- gioni obsequeretur. Q,uil lege posita, putabant oinncs solutura esse vinculum sacrament! fidelitatis i toti gente pra!stitum, simul atque princeps, ek lege violate, Catholicae reli- gioni contumaci aiiinio resisleret." Asrain : " Nihil est niLruni si gentes CatholicaB religioni quam maximd addictae, princi- pis e'xcomniunicati juguui excutcrent. Ea enim lege sese principi subditas fore polliciia erant, ut princeps ipse Catholic.-e religioni pariUfr subditus csset. I'rinceps ver6 ([ui, ob lia^resim, vel ob lacinorosani et impiain rcgui administrationem, ab EcclesiA excommuni catur, jam non censetur pius ille piinccps, cui tota gens sese committere voluerat: uiide solutum sacramcnti vinculum arbitrabantur." <' Feneion, Dissert, de auctoritate Summi Pontificis, c. xxxix). 43* 510 NOTES. by saying that, such a prince being unworthy of the throne, they therefore requested the Sovereign PontifEto make use of the authority which he had over the empire, and, through an assembly of the princes, to procure for them a worthier and better monarch." "Not long before this, the emperor Henry III had expressly acknow- ledged the Church jurisdiction, even in temporal affairs, when he wished to oppose the rising pretensions of the king of Castile to the title of empe- ror He referred the case to a council in which the legate of Pope Victor II presided, (a. d. 1055). The result of the consultation being sent to Rome, a sentence was passed ; and King Ferdinand declared, in presence of the papal envoys, that he submitted to the decision of the Roman Pon- tiff. Hence, the high authority which Rome then exercised over kings and emperors, was grounded, first, on a political claim growing out of the circumstances Vvliich accompanied the revival of the western empire; and secondly, on the general opinion of that time respecting the surbordination of the temporal to the spiritual power," (Schlegel, Philos. II, p. 137; TMo- He sociale de VEvangile ; Memonal Caihol. vol. II, p. 375). "This doctrine," says Dr. Lingard, "hostile as it might be to the inde- pendence of sovereigns, was often supported by the sovereigns themselves. Thus, when Richard I was held in captivity by the emperor, his mother, Eleanor, repeatedly solicited the Pontiff to procure his liberation by the exercise of that authority which he possessed over all temporal princes. Thus, King John Lack-land (whose excesses afterwards provoked against himself the animadversion of the Church) invoked the aid of the same authority to recover Normandy from the king of France. At first, indeed the Popes contented themselves with spiritual censures: but in an age, when all notions of justice were modelled after the feudal jurisprudence, it was soon admitted that princes by their disobedience became traitors to God: that as traitors they ought to forfeit their kingdoms, the fees which they held of God: and that to pronounce such sentence belonged to the Pontiff, the vicegerent of Christ upon earth." (Lingai'd's Hist, of Engl, vol. Ill, of the third London edition,^. 35, note). It was in virtue of these and the like principles, as the same historian relates, that Pope Innocent III did against King John Lack-land what St. Gregory VII had done against the Emperor Henry IV, when, solicited by Englishmen themselves, and moved by the recital of the repeated crimes and enormities of their sovereign, he absolved them from their oaths of fealty. This he did however, as the sequel showed, rather with the secret intention of terrifying the king, and bringing him back to a sense of his duty, than with a real determination to ruin him for ever. From these examples and testimonies, to which others might be added, we may form an accurate idea of the temporal power occasionally exer- cised by the Popes during the middle ages. They exercised it with the implicit consent of the sovereigns themselves, who frequently appealed to the decisions of Rome in their temporal debates, and none of whom scarcely ever complained, except (as was natural) the individual affected by the sentence. They exercised it only against sovereigns who depended, more or less, on the free choice of their nation and the acknowledgment of the Holy See, as was particularly the case with the German emperors. They exercised it only in cases of paramount necessity, and after every other means, such as exhortations and remonstrances, had proved fruitless. They exeicised it for the interest of the people and of society, at the request of the people themselves, and upon their earnest entreaties to be delivered from the sway of wicked, impious and tyrannical princes; but never through caprice, nor for personal interest: on the contrary, those courageous and zealous Pontiiis a Gregory, an Alexander an Iimocent> etc saw before NOTES. 511 them tho prospect of sufferings, and of every kind of obstacles and dangers which they had to encounter for the faithful discharge of their duty. Some Popes, it is true, (though few in number), went farther, and acting in their secondary quality" of temporal princes, raised troops, ana took a more or less active share in the military operations of other sove- reigns. But, even that step was taken by them for laudable, nay, for necessary purposes ; viz. to recover or defend their own provinces, to repel unjust attacks, to support the independence of the Italian republics, anci particularly to check the alarming progress of the Mussulmans. Can any tault be found with such conduct ; and does it not rather afford a new proof of the ti-uth, that the Popes have been the preservers of civilization and social order, as well as of religion, in Europe ? This indeed was the grand object which they had in view, and the end at which they continually aimed in the exercise of both their temporal and spiritual power. Having well understood the sublime office which they were called to perform, they discharged it with wonderful zeal and fidelity for the advancement of moral and religious principles. They protected the weak against their oppres- sors ; they restored peace and tranquillity among nations ; and, preventing the execution of wicked designs, they saved rising states and societies from the attacks of ambition, barbarity and licentiousness. Hence, in reading the history of the middle ages, it is impossible for a reflecting mind not to be sti'uck with admiration at the sight of Christian Europe devoted to one form of worship, ruled by one grand principle, forming, as it were, but one empire, and acknowledging one supreme head whose exalted duty it was to promote the reign of the gospel upon earth. (See Michaut, Hisioire des Croisades, vol. iv, pp. 98, 99 ; — Count de Maistre, Bu Pape, part ii, c. v, x). Not bitter censure, therefore, but real praise is due to the exertions of the Popes, and to their acts of authority with regard to temporal princes. This is at length candidly acknowledged by different writers of the Protes- tant communion, after the example of Leibnitz in several of his works, especially in his first dissertation Be Adorum Publicoi-um Usu. Very lately, two Protestant German authors, Hurter and Voigt, have published their excellent lives of Innocent III and Gregory V'll, in which the charac- ter and the conduct of these great Popes are powerfully vindicated, and held up to the un';[ualified admiration of posterity. Let us hope that the clouds which have so long obscured this part of history, will be entirely dispelled by impartiality and truth; and that full justice will at last be rendered to the Roman P'^ntiffs, for their noble efforts to promote the spiritual and temporal welfare of society. There is another charge to be examined with regard to the Popes of the middle ages. We allude, not to the ridiculous tale of the pretended Popess Joan, which is now rejected by all learned critics, whether Catholic or Protestant, but to the more serious charge of the vices of some Roman Pontiffs. It is true, a few among them gave great scandals to the Christian world in their private character and conduct; but it ought to be remem- bered, at the same time, that, through a special protection of Divine Provi- dence, the irregularity of their lives did not interfere with their public duty from which they never departed. The beneficial influence of sacred juris- diction does not depend on the private virtue of the persons invested with it, but on their divine mission and appointment to feed the Christian flock. Christ did not say that there would never be scandals nor abuses, but that no power of darkness would ever prevail against his Church : nor did he promise personal sanctity to its chief pastors, but gave to them authority to teach and govern the faithlul ; and to the faithful, a command to follow their injunctions, without blindly imitating the bad example of a small number of them, whose conduct might not be edifying. 512 NOTES. It is moreover certain that the number of bJid Popes has been, by some writers, greatly exaggerated. There were but few of this character, and those few lived, nearly all, in the tenth and part of the eleventh century, during which time the prevalence of civil factions in Rome obstructed the freedom of canonical election. Even during that period, there existed many excellent Popes ; men distinguished by their exalted virtues and intellectual endowments, patrons, in an eminent degree, of science, letters and the arts. Roscoe himself, though a Protestant, does not hesitate to say in his life of Leo the tenth, {vol. i, ;;. 53), that "the Popes may in general be considered as superior to the age in which they have lived ;" and an A.merican editor of statistics has lately confessed that "most of the Popes were excellent men." These, however, are the sovereigns, whom a recent and elementary author has, in his profound wisdom, thought proper to compare with the Mussulman caliphs, namely, with men who were either the most unjust conquerors, or the most indolent and insignificant monarchs that the world ever saw; whereas the greatest enemy of the See of Rome might be boldly challenged to show any where in history a succession of princes, who have been half as eminent for their virtues and piety, foi their talents and learning, and for their benefits to the great family of man- kind, as the Roman Pontiffs. NOTE 1. — PAGE 259. coNQUi:sT or Ireland. Before we pass any judgment and censure upon past events, we should invariably weigh with great attention their causes, their nature and their real character, and also take into serious consideration, the manners, cus- toms and opinions of the age in which they happened. Had this equitable rule been constantly adhered to in historical composition, there would have been an end to those false assertions and unjust remarks which fill up the pages of Hume, Voltaire, and other equally bold and superficial writers. For want of this rule's being followed in the particular point of which we intend to treat in this note, " the conquest of Ireland," we shall find, upon diligent inquiry, that the conduct of Pope Adrian IV in this affair has been, in latter times, neither duly appreciated nor sufficiently understood. It was formerly a common opinion, that not only Ireland, but also every Christian island, was the property of the Holy See. "There is no doubt, as you yourself acknowledge," v^TOte the Pontiff to King Henry II, " that Hibernia and all the islands to which the sun of justice, Christ, has shone forth, belong to St. Peter and to the holy Roman Church; (Episi. i jidr. papcB IV, in collect. Cone. vol. x. Col. 1143). This belief, as we learn fiom John of Salisbury, who acted as negotiator between the king and the Pope, was founded on a certain donation of Constantine the Great, the authenti- city of which was never questioned by the critics of those ages : " All islands," says that author {3Ietalog. iv), "by ancient right and from a donation of Constantine, are said to belong to the Roman Church." This having been the case, it is hard to conceive why Adrian IV should be blamed for having performed (if he did perform), an act of high temporal jurisdiction over Ireland; since in doing so, he merely acted up to the tenor of an instru- ment which all believed to be authentic, and he merely exercised, over Chris- . tian islands, that right of sovereignty which was conceded to him by the general opinion of his age. To find a real fault in his confluct, would be NOTES. 513 preposterously to require that the Popes of the middle ages should have divested themselves of the feelings common to their contemporaries, should have rejected the opinions which vpere then prevalent about temporal sove- reignty, and, through an anticipation ol several centuries, should have fol- lowed our own views and modern pohtical discoveries of which there was no idea in their time. It would be equally wrong to assert, that Adrian IV was led, in this transaction, by human considerations, and that, being an Englisman by birth, he did not hesitate to sacrifice the interests of Ireland to those of his own countiy. This charge, if seriously made, would involve a complete injustice against the well know'n character and uncommon virtue of that Pope. For, how can such base motives be fairly attributed to a Pontiff whose whole life exhibited a perfect model of piety, whom personal merit alone raised from the lowest rank in the world to the hidiest dignity in the Church, and who constantly distinguished himself by the nobleness of his sentiments, as historians unanimously testify? So great indeed was his disinterestedness and delicacy of conscience, that he preferred to leave his mother in a state of indigence, rather than do any thing Ibr her through pri- vate afiection ; and he even contented himself, before dying, with recom- mending her to the charity and alms of the Church of Canterbury; (see Fie\ivy\Hist. Eccles., ad aim. 1159). Is it credible then, is it even possible, that a Pontiff, so remarkable for the sanctity of his life and the purity df his views, who scrupled to raise his nearest and dearest relatives ever so little above their distressed condition, should have betrayed his duty and con- science in order to gratify the ambition of a monarch from whom he had received nothing, and had nothing to apprehend? Nothing then but pure and disinterested views guided Pope Adrian _IV in his share of the transaction which regarded Ireland, even in admitting the supposition which presents the less favorable side, viz : that he made a grant of that country to the British monarch. Eut, is it true after all, at least is it certainly proved, that he did so, and thus authorized the king to Invade and conquer Ireland, as we find it almost every where asserted? We rather think not, and this is the reason why, in relating thefact {p. 259), we made use of expressions somewhat diii'erent from those in which it is mentioned by the generality of historians. It appears indeed certain, that the intention of Henry was, from the beginning of his reign,_ to add this important island to his dominions ; and it is probable, likewise, that the Pope suspected his real design. Yet, it is not from half-concealed views or probable suspicions, that we should judge of the nature of the conces sion made to Henry ; but from the manner in which the whole affair was conducted, and from the authentic words in which both the re£[uest of the king and the grant of the Pope were expressed. Now, we do not see that the English monarch asked the Pontiff's appro- bation of his design to conquer Ireland and to occupy it for his own advan • tage ; but he requested Adrian to consent that he might enter that country for the purpose of subjecting its inhabitants to the laws, and repressing vice and disorder, ad subdendum ilium populum legibus, et vitiorum plantaria indA exiirpanda. The ambassador whom he sent to the Pope, vvas charged^ to assure his Holiness that Heniy's principal object was to provide instruction for the Irish people, ■'o extirpate abuses from the Lord's vineyard, etc. "but that, as every Christian island was the property of the Holy See, he did not presume to make the attempt without -the advice and consent of the successor of St. Peter." (D. Lingard, reign of Henry II). On the other hand, it is very remarkable that Adrian, in the instrument of concession which he addressed in answer to the king, does not mention any absolute grant of possession and sovereignty, much less of invasion 514 ITOTES. and conquest; he merely signifies his acquiescence in the king's project; be is willing that Henry should enter Ireland for the zealous purposes above mentioned, and that he should be honorably received and acknow- ledged as lord by the natives : " Gratura et acceptum habemus ut . . . insulam illam ingrediaris, et quod ad honorem Dei et salutem illius terrae specta- verit, exequaris, et iilius terrse populus honorific^ te recipiat, et sicut domi- num veneretur," (in Epist. citata, collect, concil. vol. x. Col. 1143). Hence, in the expressions and intention of the Pontiff, the whole concession made to the king consisted in approving the laudable views which that prince had manifested through his ambassador, and his future riojht of sovereignty over Ireland depended on the free acknowledgement of the natives. John of Salisbury, who negotiated the affair at the court of Rome, calls, it is tiMie, this concession a grant of inheritance, " dedit Hiberniam heereditario jure possidendam:" but, as the same author, in proof of his assertion, refers to the rescript of the Pope, by immediately adding, " sicut littera? ipsius tes- tantur;" his words, consequently, must be understood, like those of Adrian, to imply as a previous condition of the grant, the voluntary agreement and consent of the Irish people. At all events, we should always prefer the obvious meaning of the pontifical rescript to every other record of the transaction ; for, if any one understood well the real intention of the Pope, it must certainly have been tlie Pope himself. The truth of these observations is supported by the conduct of the Eng- lish monarch, both before and after the conquest of Ireland. The answer of Adrian to his request, had been obtained in the year 1156, and it was not till after the lapse of almost twenty years, and when a great part of Ireland had already submitted to the British, that Henry thought of pro- ducing the letters of the Pope, and presented them to be read in a synod of Irish bishops. Now, is it reasonable to suppose that, if these letters had contained a real and absolute grant of sovereignty, he would have kept them in oblivion all that time, and deferred so long to enforce their execu- tion? Would he not, at least, have exhibited them when the first EngUsh troops entered the island (A. D. 1169), in order to justify himself before the natives and gain them over to submission? Since, then, he did not do so, but postponed the exhibition of the important instrument till three or four years later, and even then directed it solely to an assembly of pre- lates ; are we not entitled to conclude that, ambitious and interested as he was, he saw little in the concession of the Pope, of which he might boast as giving him a claim to rule over the Irish, independently of their own consent ? Thus, the manner in which the affair was conducted, the expressions of the king and of the Pontiff, the conduct of Henry both before and after his attempt upon Ireland ; every thing tends to prove or to render it at leas* probable, that he received indeed an approbation of his zealous designs for the good of that country, and a wish that he might carry them into effect but no right to force the submission of the natives by invasion and con- quest. — Let us add to this, that Adrian verj'- probably 'was not ignorant of the project which had been already formed by several of the English monarchs, viz : Henrj' I and William the Conqueror, to subdue Ireland. In this critical situation of the Irish, continually* exposed to the attacks of a formidable enemy, and divided amon^ themselves, the best that could be done for them, since Henry II seriously entertained the same project and prepared to enter their country, was to procure that he should enter it vdth views the most favorable to the religion, the liberty and the improvement of the natives. This is exactly what the pope did, by the manner in which his letters of concession, or approbation of Henry's design, were written, discarding- all notion of military conquest and absolute right of NOTES. 515 sovereignty, but exhorting the king always to bear in inintl the laiidablo ptirposes and conditions which lie himself tiad proposed. No blame, tlierefore, can be attached to the conduct of this virtuous Pontiff; nor was it his fault, if his excellent and sincere intentions to procure the greoter good of the Irish, were in subsequent ages so wofully frustrated. NOTE J.— P AGE 304 PROSECUTION ANb ABOLITION OF THE KNIGHTS-TEMPLAR9. The authentic acts of the whole trial of the Knights -Templars, are still extant (apud Natal, Alexand. Dissert, x. in Sec. xiv. Quccst. ii, ^M, r; — Brumoy, Hist, de VEglise Gall., I. xxxvi, ad ann. 1307 — 1312; — Du- puy, — Baluze, etc). From those documents, it is manifest that the royal commissaries, men of exemplary virtue and probity, examined a vast num- ber of Templars in the different parts of France, viz : one hundred and forty at Paris, one hundred and eleven at Troyes, eleven at Caen, ten at Pont-de I'Arche. forty-five at Beaucaire and in the neighboring places; and that all, except three, acknowledged themselves guilty of the denial of Christ, of sacrilege, and other abominable crimes. We have moreover the acts of the Council of Vienne (Labbe, Coltedio Conciliorum, vol. xi, part ii. Col. 1557 — 1560), and the letters of Pope Clement V {ibid. Col. 1559 and 1572) concerning this affair. In one of these, addressed to all the Christian princes in Europe, the Pontiff declares that, when he himself examined at Poitiers seventy-two Templars on the charge of apostacy, sacrilege and other crimes, they expressly, spo?daneously and repeatedly acknowledged the justice of the charges ; and that the same free and spontaneous acknowledgment was made, in presence of his dele- gates, by the grand-master and other chief personages of the Order. Nor was this depravity, although more common among the Templars in France, confined to that country ; several others were found guilty of the same enormous crimes in Tuscany, Lombardy, England, etc. (Natalis Alexander, in Disseriatione citatd vol. vii, pp. 505 arid 512 ; — Hist, de VEgl. Gall. vol. XII, pp, 431 a7id 433). The Pope, therefore, with the approbation of the general council then assembled at Vienne, published his bull suppressing the institute, on account of the infamy of so many among its members, which had made it an object of contempt and scandal ; and decreed that their property should be given for ever to the Knights Hospitallers of St. John of Jerusalem. The whole transaction being thus stated from original and authentic sources, it is impossible for any reflecting mind to consider the series and duration of the inquiries ; the fair manner in which they were conducted; the great number of witnesses that were heard ; the perfect aCTeeraent in the avowals made by the accused in so many different parts of Christendom; the high standing and character of their judges, who were the first and most commendable personages of Church and State ; in fine, the delibera- tions and unanimous decision of the Pope and of three hundred prelates assembled in the council of Vienne: it is, I say, impossible to take ail these circumstances into consideration, without being at once fully con- vinced that the Templars deserved to be suppressed, and that the sentence pronounced against their Order, in the council of Vienne, was not only proper and just, but even, being the only sure means to remove a shameful scandal, ought to be considered as a very signal service rendered by Pojmj Clement V and King Philip, to religion and society. 516 NOTES. Who will not, after this, feel astoun.ded and indignant at the following narrative of Hume, when, having stated the indolence and degeneracy of the Templars, he adds, in his usual positive manner : •' But, "though these reasons had weakened the foundations of this Order once so celebrated and revered, the immediate cause of their deairuction proceeded from the cruel and vindictive spirit of Philip the Fair, who, having entertained a private disgust against some eminent Templars, determined to gratify at once his avidity and revenge, by involving the whole Order in an undistinguished ruin. On no better information than that of two Knights, condemned by their superiors to perpetual imprison- ment for their vices and profligacy, he ordered on one day all the Templars in France to be committed to prison, and imputed to them such enormous and absurd crimes, as are sufficient of themselves to destroy all the credit of the accusation. Above a hundred of these unhappy gentlemen v^ere put to the question, in order to extort from them a confession of their guilt. The more obstinate perished in the hands of their tormentors : several, to procure immediate ease in the violence of their agonies, acknowledged whatever was required of them : forged confessions were imputated to others ; and Philip, as if their guilt were now certain, proceeded to a con- fiscation of all their treasures." The writer then proceeds to relate, at great length, the punishment inflicted on the Templars, which indeed he does with affected pathos, but not without several inaccuracies; and at last concludes thus: "In all this barbarous injustice, Clement V, who was a creature of Philip, and then resided in France, fully concurred; and, without exam- ining a witness, or making an inquiry into the truth of facts, he summarily, by the plenitude of his apostolic power, abolished the whole Order. The Templars, all over Europe, were thrown into prison; tneir conduct unQer« went a strict scrutiny; the power of their enemies still pursued and op- pressed them ; but no where, except in France, were the smallest traces of their pretended guilt to be found. England sent an ample testimony of their piety and morals ; but, as the Order was now annihilated, the Knights were distributed into several convents, and their possessions were, by com- mand of the Pope, transferred to the order of St. John." (History of Eng- land, reign of Edward II). Such is, concerning the affair of the Knights-Templars, the narrative of Hume, which evinces indeed much of tlie inventive imagination of an orator, but very little of the exactness and sincerity of an historian. Here we see an almost uninterrupted series of inaccuracies and falsehoods blended with some true statements, a violent spirit of rancor against one of the two interested parties, scarcely concealed under the veil of affected compassion for the other, and an inveterate desire of finding fault with the conduct of the Pontiff and the king. Throughout the whole of his narrative, the author takes little care to relate facts in th^ order in which they hap- pened, and does not even know the names of several amon^ the chief per- sonages of whom he speaks, calling the grand-master John instead o[ Jaines of Molay; and the companion of his punishment, a brother to the sovereign of Dauphiny, instead of a brother to the Dauphin of Auvergne ; mistaking likewise the place in which "they underwent their last trial, for that in which they suffered death. These blunders, however, are mere trifles, compared with the calumnious charges of precipitancy and want of inves- tigation ; of violence employed to extort a confession of guilt ; of avarice and revenge ; of injustice and barbarity ; which he so readily lavishes on King Philip the Fair and Pope Clement V, and which we will now succ€S- fiively examine. 1st. It is wrong to state that King Philip ordered the imprisonment of NOTES. 517 all the Templars in France on the mere deposition of two Knights. Before issuing tliis order, he had instituted neAV inquiries which gave additional Btrength to the former charges. Hence it is manifest that the imputation of enormous crimes to the Order of the Templars did not proceed from that monarch, as Hume asserts, but from the very members of the Order; it being, moreover, justified by their proverbially bad character, which gave rise to the expression, boire comme un Templier. 2d. It is equally false that the confessions of the Templars with regard to the crimes imputed to them, were forged, or wrung from them by the vio- lence of torture. The one hundred and forty knights who were tried by the royal commissaries at Paris, and the seventy-two others whom the Pope himself examined at Poitiers, were not tortured, but voluntarily and freely confessed their guilt (see again Brumoy ; — Natalis Alexander; — especially the letters of Pope Clement V, quoted above ; — also Bergier, Diction. Theo • log. art. TempUers). The grand-master and the chief commanders did the same, without any constraint whatever : liberd ac sponte, absque coactione quAlibei et iimore. Most of them persevered in their avowals ; and, if seve- ral afterwards retracted what they had said, this circumstance may prove indeed that they could no longer bear to see themselves the object of public scorn, but not that they were sincere in their retraction. For, how many culprits are there, who obstinately maintain their innocence, notwithstand- ing the clear evidence of the crime laid to their charge; or, changing their plan of defence, deny what they had previously confessed, and vice versii. 3d. Notwithstanding the peremptory assertion of Hume, that no where but in France were there to be found the smallest traces of what he calls the pretended guilt of the Templars, the contrary is certain from various testimonies concerning the Templars of Tuscany, Lombardy, and even England, as Walsingham relates (Hist. Jlngl. in vita Edward 11), and Dr. Lingard acknowledges with regard to a few individuals (Hist, of Engl. vol. in, p. 472). It appears, indeed, that in several countries,most of the accused were acquitted ; but this only proves what we before said, that the Order was not equally corrupt every where, and that the poison of impiety and vice had not infected the whole body of the Knights-Templars, although it had tainted many of its members. — it was also incumbent on Mr. Hume to furnish some proofs of the reality of that violent and universal persecution which, he supposes, was carried on against the Templars, after the sup- pression of their institute : he probably thought it, as usual, an easier task to assert boldly than to prove. The truth is, there is no trace of such a persecution to be found in history. 4th. Groundless too is the assertion made by the same author, that King Philip acted as a vindictive and avaricious tyrant. That prince may have been eager and hasty in his proceedings, at least with regard to the chief personages of the Order; still, it ought to be observed that, in inflicting the rigorous punishment of death by fire, he merely ibllowed the jurisprudence commonly adopted in those ages against heinous crimes. With regard to the confiscation of the property of the Templars in France, there are unde- niable proofs of the disinterestedness of Philip in this transaction: all that he did, had for its object to preserve that property for the public utility of Christendom, as the Pope and the general council should deem advisable; nor did any portion of it pass into his own hands, except what was requi- site to defray the expenses which he had incuiTed in so long and so compli- cated a suit. The immense possessions of the Templars (except those situated in Spain and Portugal), were, as is well known, and as Hume himself acknowledj^es, transferred to the Order of St. John of Jerusalem. 5th. Still more iniquitous and atrocious than the preceding, is the charge of violence, iniustice and barbarity directed against Pope Clement ; who 44 518 NOTES. far from acting as tlie faitliful liistoriau assures us lie did, adopted tlie diametrically o^jposite course, as all the monuments and authen- tic acts of this important affair invariably testify. He continually endeavored to temper the zeal of Philip ; he constantly reccom- mended equity and prudence to the commissaries appointed to pre- side in this complicated trial : neither he nor his legates had any- thing to do with the precipitate condemnation of the grand-master. Whilst the papal commissasies heard upwards of two hundred wit- nesses either for or against the accused Order, Clement himself tried and examined seventy-two knights, with equal impartiality and care he took all possible means to know the truth, and had recourse to all possible sources of information ; in a word he continued the inquiries with indefatigable patience during five years, before he would come to a decision respecting the Order, the persons, and the property of the Templars. Is there, in such conduct, any thing that savors in the least of violence, injustice and barbarity ? 6th. Moreover, what can be more equitable, prudent and wise tnan the decision w'hich the Pontiif, after long deliberation, and many conferences with the cardinals and other prelates, published in the second session of the council of Vienne, on the third of April, 1312. In that document, he did not pronounce the whole Order guilty of the horrid cximes which had been the object of so many inquiries ; but, considering the state of acknow- ledged degeneracy into which it had fallen, the infamy with which it was loaded by the mere imputation of such disorders, and the well ascertained guilt of many of its members, he abolished it as having become not only useless, but even an object of scandal to all Christendom. Such was the dignified conduct which Hume has dared to brand with the appellation of barbarous injustice, and which another equally bold and superficial writer has presumed to call an infamous proscription. If there is, on this subject, any thing calculated to provoke the feelings of a just indignation, let the reader judge on which side it stands : on that of a Pon- tiff and a prince whose proceedings, throughout the whole of this grand afiair, were marked with so much equity and disinterestedness; or on that of two unfaithful authors, who, careless about historical truth and justice, have ventured, without proof, and against all reason, to paint the important transaction in such sombre colors? NOTE K.— PAGE 347. INQUISITION. _ What has not been said about, or rather against, the Spanish Inquisi- tion ? We eveiy where see it depicted in the blackest colors, and repre- sented as the ofispring of papal ambition and ecclesiastical tj^ranny; as a bloody tribunal, condemning innocent persons to death for mere thoughts and opinions ; an institution, whose proceedings are the most terrific that human bigotry and malice could suggest; etc. In answer U these charges we will remark, in the first place, that the Inquisition forms no part of the Catholic creed and of the obligatory disci- pline of the Church. We find, it is true, that it was established in some Catholic states as a political means to maintain the unity of religion within their limits, and remove from them the disturbances occasioned by newly invented systems ; but this was commonly done, either at the request, or by the authority of the sovereigns themselves, e. g., of King Ferdinand in NOTES. 519 Spam (A. D. 1480), of John III in Portugal (a. d. 1557)- This Inquisition therefore, besides being a local and temporary institution, was rattier civif than ecclesiastical in its origin. Its chief members, particularly in Spain, were indeed selected from the ecclesiastical order, but they always remained under the authority of the king, without whose previous consent their de- crees could be neither executed nor even published. In the second place, the Inquisition, far from being as bloody and in- exorably severe as is commonly imagined, far from inflicting capital punish- ment even for mere thoughts and opinions, on the contrary never inflicted it even for open and atrocious crimes, the tribunal having never been au- thorized to pass sentence of death or of mutilation upon any person; this power resided entirely and solely in the civil authority. All that the council of the Inquisition had to do, was to pronounce the individual arraigned be- fore tliem guilty, on the clearest evidence, of a crime declared capital by the law^ of Spain, There they stopped ; and, instead of prosecuting to death, they rather displayed a degree of indulgence and clemency seldom witnessed in any other tribunal. If the culprit manifested sincere repentance, he was immediately screened from capital punishment, and condemned merely to undergo temporary and trifling penances. If, notwithstanding tlie convinc- ing proofs of his guilt, he remained obstinate and impenitent, then, and not till then, was he delivered over to the civil powder to be dealt with accord- ing to law; and, even in this case, the inquisitors recommended the wretched individual to the mercy of the secular judge.* They had nothing to do with his death ; and, when, at the moment of execution, the priest appeared by the side of the guilty man, it was only to inspire him, if possible, with sen- timents of repentance, to soothe his agony by words of consolation, and to prepare him for eternity. Even admitting that some inquisitors, from time to time, acted with ex- cessive rigor, which led to certain abuses and unjustifiableconclusions, still it is true that these proceedings should "be charged only to the individuals in question, but not to the tribunal itself fairly considered in its nature, its end and its regulations, nor to the generality' of its members, whose prudence, justice and integrity have elicited the admiration of all attentive and impar- tial travellers (v. g., Abb6 de Vayrac, in his Voyage en Espagne et en Italic, 1731 ; Bourgoing, Nonveau Voyage en Espagne ; and Journal de VEmpire, 1805). Again, these abuses, whatever they were, might be ascribed to the civil, but not to the ecclesiastical power, as is well explained by Count de Maistre in his two first letters on the Spanish Inquisition ; much less could they be imputed either to the Catholic church at large, of which the church of Spain is but a portion, or to the Roman See in particular, since the In- quisition at Rome greatly differed from that of Spain, and always displayed such moderation, indulgence and meekness, as to astonish the French infi- dels themselves (Encyclop. art. Inquisition). With regard to the awful and terrible forms which the Inquisition is said to have adopted, the charge may be partly admitted without furnishing any ground for invective ; nor is it at all surprising that a tribunal should make an exterior show of rigor, the better to strike the minds of the people, and the more surely to prevent the perpetration of crime. It is, however, cer- * Tlie case of the famous heresiarch John Huss, in 1415, was conducted in the same manner. The council of Constance, not liaving been able, by remonstrances and exhor- tations, to overcome his obstinacy and bring him to a retractation of liis errors, handed him over to the civil power, without however soliciting his punishment. The secular court was not so indulgent: the emperor Sigismond thought it his duty to punish the man who, besides repeatedly infringing the conditions of the safe-conduct he had received, every where preached seditious doctilnes ; accordingly, John IIuss was placed under tlio custody of the magistrate of Constance^ who, fijilowing the jurisprudence of the age with regard to such trespasses, consigned liini to the tlanies. 520 NOTES. tain that, on Ihis point also, there have been many exaggerations and slanderous reports. Thus, as Count de Maistre observes (lett. ii.)> it is by no means true that the most trilling charge was sufficient to cause a man to be arrested ; that the accused remained unacquainted with the reasons of his confinement, and was not allowed the privilege of a lawyer to defend his cause. The punishment of burning, too, far from being, as it is com- monly supposed, the ordinary one to which the convicted persons were condemned, was, on the contrary, very seldom employed, and that by the civil power only, and against such enormous crimes, sacrilege, apostacy, and the like, as were not more mildly treated by the other European nations. Faults of a less grievous nature were punished merely by exile or imprisonment, sentence of death being very rare, especially in lattei times, when, as well natives as foreigners, who did not attempt to disturb religious or social order, could live with as much tranquillity and security in Spain as in any other country. When the Spaniards are reproached with the rigors, real or pretended, of this famous tribunal, their answer is, that, by punishing a few obstinate individuals, it saved their monarchy from the awful disturbances and civil wars which desolated Switzerland, Germany, Holland, France, etc., in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries ; and did not, after all, cause so much blood to flow in all their dominions together, as the Calvinian reformation did in the single kingdom of France. NOTE L.— PAGE 357. BULL OF ALEXANDER VI, CALLED THE BULL OF PARTITION. "Writers," says Dr. Lingard, "have not always sufficiently appre- ciated the benefits which mankind derived from the pacific influence of the Roman Pontiffs. In an age which valued no merit but that of arms, Europe would have been plunged in perpetual war, had not Pope after Pope labored incessantly for the preservation or restoration of peace. They rebuked the passions, and checked the extravagant pretensions of sove- reigns : their character, as the common fathers of Christians, gave to their representatives a weight which no other mediators could claim : and their legates spared neither journey nor fatigue to reconcile the jarring interests of courts, and interpose the olive of peace between the swords of contend- ing armies," (Histor. of Engl. vol. iv,p. 80). These general remarks on the happy influence exercised at different times by the Sovereign Pontiffs, are particularly applicable to the conduct of Pope Alexander VI, with regard to the Spanish and Portuguese sove- reigns. He had to settle between them, by a solemn decision, the respec- tive boundaries of their foreign possessions, and, by so doing, prevent the endless and sanguinary contests that might have otherwise followed; this the Pontiff did by issuing the famous bull l[nter ccBtera : he, at the same time, improved the opportunity of benefitting the natives of the newly discovered countries, by requiring of their conquerors that they should procure for them religious and Christian instruction.* Had he refused to listen to the * The words of the Pontiff are these : "Insuper mandamus vobis in virtute sancts obe- dientiae (sicut pclliceniini, et non dubitamus pro vestrA maxima devotione et regi& mag- nanimitate vos esse facturos) ad lerras firnias et iiisulas prasdictas viros probos et Deuin timentes, doctos, peritos et expertos, ad instruendum incolas et habilatores praefatos in ilde Oatholicfi., et bonis moribus imbuendum, destinare studeatis, omnem dcbitam diligen- liam in prEemissis adliibentes." — Bulla Inter Ccctera, n. 7. NOTES. 521 appeal of tho interested parties, he might indeed have removed the danger of being charged with entertaining ambitious views ; but would he not have incurred the guilt .of unjustifiable want of zeal and care, both to prevent the effusion of human blood, and to promote the advantage of the defence- less Indians ? For, it should ever be remembered tliat the kings of Spain and Portugnl would, in any hypothesis, have taken and kept possession of the lands lately descried by their navigators, this having been their full determination from the beginning; hence, there would have existed, on one side, a continued subject of quarrels between the two nations lor the determination of their foreign limits, and, on the other, there would have been no condition imposed on them to better the fate of the Indiana. The decision, therefore, of Alexander VI, was not only conducive to the preservation of peace among the conquerors, but highly advantageous to the vanquished themselves, ibr whom it secured the blessings of civilization and Christianity. "Ferdinand," says the elegant historian of Columbus, "had despatched ambassadors to the Court of Rome, announcing the new discovery as an extraordinary triumph of the faith At least as politic as he was pious, he insinuated a hint at the same time, by which the Pope might perceive that he tvas determmed, at all events, to maintain his important acquisitions. His ambassadors were instructed to state that, in the opinion of many learned men, these newly discovered lands, having been taken possession of by the Catholic Sovereigns, their title to the same did not require the papal sanction ; still, as pious princes obedient to the holy chair, tliey supplicated His Holiness to issue a bull, making a concession of them, and of such others as might be discovered, to the crown of Castile," (Irving's ColumbuSy b. V. ch. VIII). From this it manifestly appears that the Spanish Sovereigns had not waited for the grant of the Pope, to take possession of the West Indies "The question," says a learned critic, (Bergier, art. JDemarcatian) "was not to decide whether their conquests, and those of the king of Portugal, were lawful or not, but to remove, by the fixation of their limits, the evils of war which would have visited the European discoverers, without render- ing the fate of the Indians better." Hence, it is useless to ask what right the Pontitf had to give lands and countries which did not belong to him, since his solemn award, although it seemed to contain a real grant, was simply a measure tending to prevent bloody quarrels between two jealous and powerful monarchs; whilst it also provided for the civil and moral im- provement of their new subjects. To act the part of an authoritative arbi- trator, does not require to have jurisdiction over the object of the debate, but over the contending parties ; especially, if they themselves have re- ferred the case to their common acknowledged superior, and have asked his decision. Instead then of inveighing against the bull of Alexander VI, it would be better, as Feller and Count de Maistre observe, to regret that the time has passed, when a single w-ord from the Roman Pontiff was sufficient to main- tain peace among kings and nations, and when his impartial voice and universally revered influence easily removed the danger of obstinate dis- sensions and sanguinary conflicts. 44* 522 NOTES. NOT EM.— PAGE 367. INFLUENCE OF THE EOMAN CHUECH ON THE IMPKOVEMENT OF SCIENCE. AFFAIR OF GALILEO.— THE CALENDAR. The Roman Church, as we have already noticed in several parts of this work, has rendered multiplied and signal services to the arts, sciences, and belles lettrefw Still, it is often said that she has, within the last ages, rather opposed their improvement ; and were we to believe certain authors in their poetical, astronomical, and geographical descriptions, the very land and city in which there has always been found, to the present day, a greater share of true taste and solid learning than any where else, should be considered a half barbarous and hardly civilized region. The principal fact adduced to support this unjust charge, is the aftair of Galileo, whoma multitude of writers represent as having been persecuted on account of his astronomical discoveries, and condemned by the Roman inquisitors merely for teaching, according to the opinion of Copernicus, the true system of the world. But i- is now well proved, from the letters of Guichardin ana of Marquis Nicolini, both of them disciples, friends and protectors of Gali- leo, from the letters and writings of Galileo himself, that, for alongtime, the public has been grossly imposed upon with respect to this point ot history. This celebrated man was not arraigned as an astronomer, but as a bad theologian, and for having pretended to impute to the Bible dogmas of his own invention. His great discoveries, it is true, provoked envy against him; but his pretension to prove the Copernican system from the Bible was the real cause of his being summoned before the inquisitors at Rome ; and the restlessness of his mind, the only source of the troubles which he underwent on that account. In his first journeys to Rome (1611, etc.), Galileo found only admirers among the cardinals and other distinguished personages. The Pope him- self granted him a favorable audience, and Cardinal Bellarmine merely forbade him, in the name of His Holiness, to blend in future the Bible witli his astronomical systems. Other learned prelates equally pointed out to him the course of prudence to be observed by him on this point ; but hia obstinacy and vanity did not permit him to follow their advice. Some years after, he published his "Dialogues and Memoirs," in whicK he again took upon himself to raise the system of the rotation of the earth to the dignity of a dogmatical tenet. Being summoned before the tribunals of Rome, the lodging assigned to him in that city, was not a gloomy prison, not a frightful dungeon, but the palace of Tuscany, and, for eighteen days, the apartments of the attorney-general, where he had every facility to take exercise and carry on his correspondence. During the trial, the main object of his answers was not the scientific view of the question, since he had been allowed to defend his system as an astronomic^ hypothesis, bul its pretended association with the Bible. Not long after having received his sentence and made his recantation, Galileo obtained leave to revisit hia native countiy, and, far from being persecuted, was dismissed with new -marks of esteem for his talents and of regard for his person. For these interesting documents respecting the adair of Galileo, we are indebted to tlie researches of an impai'tial Protestant, Mr. Mallet — ^Dupai) NOTES. 523 of Geneva, who wrote a dissertation on the subject, in the Mereure de France, 17 Juillei 1784, n. 29 — see B^raut-Bercastel, Hisloire de VEglue^ ad ann. 1634; and Barrier, Diction, de theoL, art. Monde, and Sciences The Roman Church, far from impeding the progress of astronomy or of other sciences, on this or any other occasion, has on the contrary rendered, even in that respect, the most undeniable and signal' services. We allude chiefly to the reformation of the calendar, an event which took place undei Pope Gregory XIII, some years before the time of Galileo, and which is well deserving of notice. By Calendar is meant a certain distribution of time adapted to religious and civil purposes, and pointing out the order and succession of the days, weeks, months and festivals of the year. All civilized nations have ever felt the necessity of having such a regular distribution of time ; but it required a long series of ages, a deep study of astronomy, and innumerable calculations, to contrive a good and exact calendar. In former times, the year was believed to be eleven minutes longer than it is in reality. This difference^ though apparently trifling, had ^become, by being repeated from year to year during the course of many centuries, 30 very sensible and material, that in the yeaj: 1582, the vernal equinox fell on the eleventh of March, whereas the calendar marked it on the twenty- first of the same month ; a day which had been assigned to it by the astrono- mers of Alexandria, in 325. The consequence was, that festivals were no longer celebrated in their proper time ; and Easter, in particular, which de- pends on the full moon of March, would, in the course of ages, have been successively found in Summer, Autumn and Winter. To remedy this confusion, Gregory XIII suppressed at once from the year 1582 ten entire days (those between the 4th and 15th of October), by which the real equinox was in advance of tlie equinox of the calendar; thus making them again coincide, and restoring all Christian festivals to their proper epoch throughout the year. Aloreover, measures and precautions, suggested by skilful mathematicians and astronomers, were taken to prevent the like confusion in future, and the whole work being completed, received the solemn sanction of the Pope, in his bull of the same year, 1582. These corrections in the calendar were successively ado.pted by nearly edl Christian nations, even those separated from the See of Rome ; v. g., by the English, in 1752; by the Swedes, in 1753; by the German States, in 1776. The Russians are the only civilized people in Europe, who have hitherto refused to admit the important improvement, and still adhere to the old style ; the consequence of which is that they are now, in their computa- tion of the year, twelve days behind the real time ; thus preferring, as a judi- cious author pointedly remarks, rather to be at variance with the heavens and the stars, tlian to agree with the Roman PontilF. NOTE N.— P AGE 397 MASSACRE OF ST. BARTHOLOMEW'S DAY. NoTEiNG perhaps IS more common, and yet notliing can be more unjust, than to take advantage of the Massacre of St. Bartholomew's day, to inveigh against the Catholic community and the Catholic principles, as if the awful deed had proceeded from their influence. If we consult the authentic and contemporary documents collected and adduced by those persons who have made a deep and impartial study of the whole transaction v. g Caveirac, Dissert, sur la St Bar- 524 NOTES. thelemi ; — Lingard, viii, Note T. ;— Daniel, Hist, de France, aclann. 1572) , we sliall find tliat religion had nothing to do with it, except to check its course as much as possible, and to weep over the devoted victims of the Massacre ; that the whole affair was merely the effect of political resentment and of a sudden ebullition of anger ; in fine, that a much smaller number of persons perished on the occasion than is commonly believed. The series and close connexion of the events immediately preceding the massacre, are sufficient to show that it originated in the animosity of the French court against the Protestant party, and was dictated by a violent desire of revenge. The mind of the young king, Charles IX, had been fre- quently harassed and exasperated by the repeated attacks of the Huguenots against his authority, and by the report of the many cruelties which they had committed throughout the kingdom during the last civil w^ars. Not- withstanding these causes of provocation, he would not have adopted the dreadful measure, had it not been for the positive assertion of his mothei and chief counsellors, that he could no longer escape the plots of that party, without putting to death or in. confinement its chief leaders, and that, were he to wait till next morning, his most faithful officers, his family, perhap3 himself, would be sacrificed to their vengeance. The king then gave his consent to the projected massacre; the time was appointed, and the execu- tion took place during a considerable part of the following day, the twenty- fourth of August, 1572. Thus, the odious deed was not the result of a long premeditated and general plot, but the effect of a sudden fit of anger and revenge ; it v/as, moreover, projected against the leadeis only of the Huguenot party, and intended to have taken place only in Paris. If the example of the capital was followed in many other cities, v. g., Lyons, Rouen, Toulouse, Bor- deaux, etc., this was owing chiefly to the violent excitement which the conduct and cruelties of the Calvinists, during the preceding insurrections, had produced in the minds of the Catholics. Par from sending orders to the provinces against Protestants, Charles IX, on the contrary, both in writ- ing and by word of mouth, frequently expressed his intention that the bloody scene should not be repeated, nor extended beyond the limits of Paris. And indeed, the great difference of the epochs at which the massacres were committed in the cities just mentioned, also shows that they ought to be attributed rather to sudden ebullitions of popular vengeance, than to any previously concerted and general plan. Every one may see the detailed proofs of these assertions in the two first authors above mentioned. Of the number of victims in all those towns, including the capital, it is impossible to speak with certainty. Among the Huguenot writers, some reckon seventy thousand ; others, thirty or twenty or fifteen thousand : but all these amounts seem to be exaggerated. " The reformed martyrologist adopted a measure of ascertaining the real number, which may enable us to form a probable conjecture. He procured from the ministers in the different towns where the massacres had taken place, lists of the names of the per- sons who had suffered, or were supposed to have suffered. He published the result in 15S2 ; and the reader will be surprised to learn that in all France he could discover the names of no more than seven hundred and eighty-six persons. Perhaps, if we double that number, we shaU not be far from the real amount." (Lingard in loco cit.) Above all, it is certain that religion had nothing to do with the massacre, whether as a motive or an encouragement. In the contriving of the wretched scheme, the passions of the French court, jealousy, animosity, revenue, were the real and only cause ; and the pretence was a supposed conspiracy of the Protestant leaders against the king, his servants and his NOTES. 525 femily. No clergymen were consulted about the adoption of the awful measure ; and, when they heard of it after its execution, far from obtaining their approbation, it rather excited in their bosoms feelings of horror for the deed, and of commiseration for its victims. The only share which bishops, priests and monks took in it, was to save as many as they could of the Pro- testants, who, in many towns, v. g., Lisieux, Toulouse, Lyons, Bordeaux, had taken refuge in their hospitable dwellings. It is objected that Pope Gregory XIII publicly returned thanks to God on that occasion; — but what was the real object of this rejoicing? Charles IX, in order to palliate the sharne of his murderous edict against the Pari- sian Huguenots, wrote to every court in Europe, that, having just detected their horrid plots against his authority and person, he had been fortunate enough to escape from the imminent danger, by putting the conspirators to death without delay. The Pope then, under that impression, rejoiced, not for the death of the supposed traitors, whose rigorous punishment he on the contrary deplored, but for the preservation of the French monarch and of his kingdom from utter ruin : exactly, as in a case of war, and of a signal victory against invaders, public rejoicings would take place, and every sensible person would willingly share in them, not indeed at the blood shed in battle, but at the advantages gained over an unjust enemy ; and who could dare to find a fault in such conduct? NOTE O.— PAGE 414. REVOCATION OF THE EDICT OF NANTES. Eefore attempting to present a vindication of this famous Revocation, we will quote the words in which it is recorded by Hume, in the eighth volume of his History. "Louis XIV," says he, "having long harassed and molested the Protestants, at last entirely revoked the Edict of Nantes, which had been enacted by Henry IV for securing them the free exercise of their religion; which had been declared irrevocable; and which, during the experience of near a century, had been attended with no sensible inconve- nience. All the iniquities 'inseparable from persecutions were exercised against those unhappy religionists, who became obstinate in proportion to the oppressions which they suffered, and either covered under a feigned conversion a more violent abhorrence for the Catholic communion, or sought among foreign nations for that liberty of which they were bereaved in their native country'; Above half a million of the most useful and indus- trious subjects deserted France, and exported, together with immense sums of money, those arts and manufactures which had chiefly tended to enrich that kingdom. They propagated every where the most tragical accounts of the tyranny exercised agamst them, and revived amon^ the Protestants all that resentment against the bloody and persecuting spirit of popeiy, to which so many incidents in all a^es had given too much foundation." Such is, without the change of a smgle word, the language of Hume con- cerning the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes. That it is, in most points, and especially in the conclusion, the language of virulence, untruth and calumny, will appear manifest from the bare recital, in this, and the follow- ing note, of the facts connected with the important subject now before us, and of such rotorious facts, too, as the most envious criticism cannot rationally deny Previously to uie reign of I,ouis XIV, the Huguenots, by dii t of threats 526 NOTES. and violence had extorted from die French kings, particularly from Henry IV in 1598, innumerable privileges, and a sort of separate government in the very heart of the kingdom. Their repeated insurrections under Louis XIII were checked, and their military forces annihilated by the genius of Richelieu ; still they continued, even under this pow^erful minister, to pos- sess a legal existence, and to enjoy the free exercise of their religion. Unfortunately, their spirit of rancor and animosity always continued the same ; they constantly manifested the most shameful opposition to the interests of their own country, repeatedly endeavored to overturn her con- stitution and government, always favored her foreign foes, as was manifest from their authentic acts and writings, and carried so far their hostile de- signs, £is to open, as far as they were able, her frontiers to the Germans and the Dutch, and her maritime towns, Le Havre and La Rochelle, to the English, the greatest enemies of France ; in a word, so multiplied were their infractions of several articles of the Edict of Nantes, that it required DO fewer than two hundred decrees of various courts of justice to check these new encroachments, as may be seen in the work of Abb^ Caveirac on this subject, pp. 195 — 246, and lxi — lxiii of the notes. Moreover, the bloody civil wars formerly excited by the Huguenots, »vere not yet forgotten, and the fresh remembrance of past evils mclined the nation to adopt measures calculated to prevent their repetition. "I do not speak," says the illustrious pupil of Fenelon, the duke of Burgundy, in his memoirs, "of the calamities produced by the new doctrines in Ger- many, England, Scotland, Ireland, etc.; I speak of France only. Nor shall I enumerate one by one, the evils of which it was the theatre, and which are recorded in so many authentic documents; the secret assemblies; the leagues formed with foreign enemies ; the attempts against the govern- ment ; the seditious threats, open revolts, conspiracies, and bloody wars ; the plundering and sacking of towns ; the deliberate massacres, and atro- cious sacrileges : suffice it to say, that, from Francis I to Louis XIV, during seven successive reigns, ail these evils and many others, with more or less violence, desolated the French monarchy. This is a point of history which, although it may be variously related, can neither be denied nor called in question ; and it is from this capital point that we should start in the political examination of this grand affair." Under the fresh recollection of so many trespasses and obnoxious deeds of the Huguenots, an intimate persuasion, founded on the natural rights of nations and the security of governments, had pervaded all classes of people, that the king was justifiable in adopting vigorous measures for the purpose of checking this ill-affected portion of his subjects. It was the general opinion, that the Edict of Nantes, both from its nature and on account of its numerous violations by the very party whom it favored, might be re- voked, since the good and tranquillity of the state called for its revocation. So little doubt did there exist concerning this right of repeal, that even Arnauld, a Jansenist, and Grotius, a Protestant, openly acknowledged it in their writings;* nor indeed could it be denied without unjust partiality, since there was not, at this period, a single Protestant government m Europe, which, notwithstanding much more sacred ties or contracts, did not act more severely against their peaceful Catholic subjects, than the French court prepared to do against the restless and ever disaffected Huguenots. Moved by these considerations, the ministry under Louis XIV employed * The following are tlic words of the latter : " Ndrint illi, qui Reformatorum sibi impo- nunt vocabulum, non esse ilia faedera, sed reguin cdicta, ob publicam facta utilitatem, ct xevocaUlia, si aliud regibus publica utilitas suaserlt Rivetiani apologetici discussio, p. $^. NOTES. 527 itself in gradually undermining their party, and taking away from them the power and opportunities of exciting new disturbances in Franco; still notliing appeared to threaten the entire abolition of their privileges, when, alarming symptoms of insurrection manifested by them throughout the southern and western provinces, caused it to become a matter of serious debate in the council of the king. The proposed measure passed by the unanimous vote of the coiKisellors and ministers ; the Edict of Nantes was revokea ; and, as the factious and hostile spirit of the Huguenot ministers was too well known to be safely tolerated, such of their number as refused to abjure their tenets within the space of two months, were commanded to quit the kingdom. As to the other Protestants, they were not only allowed, but even encouraged to remain in France, where they mi^ht freely carry CD their business and commerce as before, and enjoy their property and their civil rights under the protection of the law, " without being troubled and vexed on account of their religion." These are the very terms of the repealing statute. It is, therefore, a gross inaccuracy to assert or suppose that the French Huguenots were promiscuously condemned to banishment, or doomed to oppression and all the iniquities inseparable from persecution in their native country. Many of them, it is true, preferred to follow their ministers into exile ; but this was a mere effect of their own choice, which the govern- ment never intended nor encouraged. It is true also that, in several places, acts of rigor, owing to unforeseen incidents, were exercised against them; but this happened only in the places where the religionists, misunderstand- ing the moderate views of their sovereign, provoked his justice by their excesses and revolts. As to the acts of violence which some individuals occasionally recommended or practised, they were entirely repugnant both to the character and intentions of the monarch, who bitterly complained of this criminal abuse of his authority. He not only published new enactments to check these disorders, but also endeavored to remove from the attendance of Protestants at religious in- structions even the appearance of constraint ; following in this the advice of Bossuet, Fenelon, and other distinguished persons of the clergy, as Car- dinal de Bausset relates in the lives of these two illustrious bishops. Even before this, so remote were the ideas of the king from any thing like perse- cution, that, in a letter to the Intendants of the provinces, he said in express terms, that he recommended to them above all to treat the Protestants with mildness, je vous recommande surtout de menager avec douceur les esprits de ceux de ladite religion; and, when information was given him that two of these governors had followed a different course, he severely reprimanded one, and recalled the other. But did not Louis XIV at least commit a great political fault, or, as some call it, a suicidal act against France, by giving occasion to so many indus- trious and useful subjects to leave the kingdom ? — So indeed it seems to several persons, but on what grounds does not appear. Even supposing the commercial and pecuniary disadvantage for some parts of France to have been as great as is commonly supposed, Louis XIV may have justly considered it a mere trifle, when weighed in the balance against the secu- rity and tranquillity of the whole kingdom. After all, there has evidently been much exaggeration in estimating the loss which France may have suffered on that occasion. Whatever were the complaints issued by some interested individuals, time and experience showed that arts, manufactures and trade had scarcely suffered any sensible detriment; or it was, at least, quickly repaired, since from nearly that period, commerce and industry became more and more flourishing in France, and no later than two years after the Edict of Eevocation, the revenues of the crown, without any 528 NOTES. harsh or oppressive measure, were augmented. Noi is it at all true that the French refugees exported much money; the richest among them had remained in France, and those who freely chose to emigrate were mostly t^^orkmen and laborers, rather requiring support from the countries which received them, than capable of enriching their benefactors, as their own bistorians confess; (apud Caveirac, pp.93 — 97). Nor, in fine, did they materially contribute, except perhaps in Prussia:, to the splendor of foreign manufactures, which were flourishing and prosperous before their arrival. As to the number of the emigrants, it is difficult to ascertain it, though we may be assured that there is another gross exaggeration in the amount of above half a million asserted hy Hume. Larrey and Benoit, two Protestant anthers, admit it to have been of about two hundred thousand persons ; but several critics think that it ought to be reduced, upon fair calculation, to one-fourth or at least one-third of that amount. Among others, the Duke of Burgundy, whose candor and sincerity, as well as means of research, cannot be doubted, assures us that the French refugees were not more than sixty-eight thousand in all; a number less than was carried oif by a single civil war. So little injury was thought at the time to result to France from the revoca- tion of the Edict of Nantes, that Louis XIV received innumerable con- gratulations on this account. Both subjects and foreigners appeared more surprised at the rapid execution of the measure, than at the measure itself; even the famous Bayle proved to his fellow exiles that it was their own conduct that had forced the king to revoke their privileges, and that, after all, the laws enacted in most Protestant countries against Catholics were more stern and rigorous than any published by Catholic princes against Protestants, {Jvis aux Refugies, etc). If then the Huguenots filled the world with their invectives against the French government, no reasonable man will refuse to ascribe their conduct rather to the dictate of passion, than to their love of truth and justice. For, who does not know that the guilty commonly complain of the tiibunal by which they were condemned? And who will ever consider as worthy of credit the historian who, lending an attentive ear to these complaints and invectives of one part)% sets aside the victorious defence and the unexceptionable reasons of the other? NOTE P.— PAGE 460. ON RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION. To all persons ever so little acquainted with the history of the last ages, it must be matter of the greatest surprise to see the charge of Moody and persecuting spirit so incessantly urged against the Catholic Church by those against whom it may be so easily and so victoriously retorted. Without mentioning the rigors exercised by Frederick William HI, King of Prussia, the oppressive yoke laid over Catholic Poland by the present autocrat of Russia and his fatlier, Nicholas, and the inhumanity of the former penal laws of England, etc., what violence and persecution did not the Catholics of the sixteenth century sufier in Denmark, Swe- den and Scotland, although theirs was the ancient and established fiiith, v/liilst the doctrines of their persecutors were novelties both in Church and State! What cruelties were not committed against them in dilTerent parts of Germany, where it may be said that streams of blood marked the progress of the reformed religion ; — in Holland, where the sanguin- arv Vandermerk slaughtered more unoffending Catholic persons in the NOTES. 529 year 1572, than the severe Duke of Alva executed Protestant insurgents during his whole government ; — in France, where the fury of the Hugue- nots, oesides many particular atrocities, burnt nine hundred towns and tillages in the province of Dauphin^ alone, and excited nine or ten civil wars, which cost the lives of more than two millions of men ; and that, too, upon avowed principle, aad according to the maxims laid down by the very authors of the reformation, Luther, Calvin, Beza, etc. On the contrary, we have proved, in ditferent Notes, that neither the pas- tors, nor the tenets and principles of the Catholic Church, had any share io the Massacre of St. Bartholomew's Da}^ in the Gun-powder Plot, in the abuses which may have accidentally taken place in the Spanish Inquisition, or in the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes. Sometimes, indeed, when there have existed sectarians, like the Albigenses, implacable disturbers of the public peace, and enemies of all social and religious order, the Church exhorted and requested the civil power to repress their excesses: but this surely cannot, without a manifest abuse of language, be termed pertecution; otherwise we ought to call by the s.une name all civil laws enacted against robbers and murderers. As to the acts of real persecution, cruelty and violence of which some Catliolics may have occasionall}'^ been guilty, they not only never met with any kind of encouragement or approbation from her; but she rather endeavored, as muclr as lay in her power, to prevent or check those ebullitions of individual and popular fury ; and, however zealous to propagate the Christian faith, she always inculcated that principle, which has even become a part of tlie Canon Law, that no one should embrace it by force. That this has been constantly, from the primitive ages down to the present time, her true spirit and the rule of her conduct, may be easily shown from a great variety of facts and testimonies, even confining ourselves to such as are connected with the events and personages mentioned in the course of this history. The first Christian emperor, Constantine the Great, was far from retaliating upon the heathens the rigor which his predecessors had exercised against the Christians. However great was his zeal lor the ditfusion of the true religion, in which he had been instructed by Catholic bishops, he did not so much as attempt to compel, but contented himself with mildly exhorting his subjects to embrace it, and even gave orders that no one should be in the least annoyed on account of his religion. See his life by Eusebius, b. ii. ch. 47, 48, etc. Another Christian emperor, Honorius, having in 410 passed very severe edicts to repress ihe horrid excesses and cruelties of the Donatists in Africa, St. Augustine and other orthodox prelates exerted all their influence to mitigate in favor of these wretched people the severity of the law, and to procure their conversion by instructions and conferences, rather than let their bodies perish by capital punisliment. We learn from Possidius, the disciple and friend of St. Augustine, in the life of this holy doctor, (n. 14), that they had the satisfaction to succeed in their charitable tindertaking. Pope St. Leo the Great, who lived at a time when the Church was at- tacked by very dangerous heretics, spanking of the Maiiicheans, the worst of all, says that " the ecclesiastical lenity was content, even in this case, with the sacerdotal judgment, and avoided all sanguinary punishments." A remarkable fact had recently proved the truth of his assertion. It was against a branch of these sectarians, the PrisciUians, that the secular arm first exerted its severity, at Triers under the emperor Maximus, about the year 385. This event served to show how adverse the Catholic Church is to the bloody spirit of persecution: Pope St. Siricius, and the most holy prelates of the West, blamed the rio-or that has been exercised against the Vrisciliians, and the two bishops Itnaciua and Idacius, who had obtained 45 530 NOTES. heir condemnation in a civil court, were themselves condemned for that ven- reason in the councils of Milan (a. d. 390) and of Turin (4Q1). When Ethelbert, King of Kent, was converted to the true reli;^ion b)^ the apostle of England, St. Austin, he had a great desire that all his subjects should like him embrace Christianity; but, as venerable Bede relates, he did not compel any one to do so, becaiise he had learned from the Roman misdonanes that the service of Christ ought to be voluntary. — Pope St Gregory the Great, by whom these holy missionaries were sent to England, evinced on many other occasions his firm adherence to this mild spirit cf Christianity. Writing to the bishop of Terracina, who had used some violence against the Jews, he said : " It is by mildness and exhortations, not by threats and terror, that the infidels must be induced to become Christians;" and again, to a patriarch of Constantinople: "This is indeed a very stranp^e way of preaching, which enforces the true faith by ill-treat- ment!" Such were the principles and the constant doctrine of that holy pontiff. St. Bernard, abbot of Clairvaux and the brightest ornament of his age, having learned that a fanatical preacher exhorted the people to murder the Jews as enemies of Christianity, rose against him with all the force of his eloquence, and rescued these devoted victims from the danger which threa- tened them. Pope Clement VI, in a similar ebullition of popular fury, hastened to forbid, even under penalty of excommunication, any violence to be otTered to them either in their persons or in their property ; and it i? well known in general that the Jews never enjoyed greater protection than under the Roman Pontiffs ; so much so, that the city of Rome, where they occupy a separate quarter, with mere precautions of police, has been proverbially called the Paradise of the Jeivs. Robertson, in his History of America, renders full justice to the zeal and charity of the Spanish ecclesiastics in favor of the Indians of San Domingo, at the time when these unhappy people were harshly treated by their con- querors. "The missionaries," says he," in conformity to the mild spirit i>f that religion which they were employed to publish, early remonstrated against this condnd." Besides the Dominican fathers, and the zealous Bar- tholomew Las Casas whose exertions in that noble cause are so justly renowned, the monks of St. Jerome also " neglected no circumstance that tended to mitigate the rigor of the yoke : and by their authority, their ex- ample and their exhortations, they labored to inspire their countrymen with sentiments of equity and gentleness towards the Indians." {b. iii, ad ann. 1517). In the fifth book of his work, the same historian relates that Cortez havin*^ resolved, in his march towards Mexico, to destroy by open force the altavs and the idols of the Tlascalans, was checked in his inconsiderate design by Father Olmedo, a chaplain to the expedition. This venerable man "repre- sented that religion was not to be propagated by the sword, or infidels to be converted by virulence; that other weapons were to be employed in Ihis ministry, namely, patient instruction and pious example The remon- Btrances of an ecclesiastic no less respectable for wisdom than virtue, had their proper weight with Cortez: he left the Tlascalans in the undisturbed exercise of their own rites, requiring only that they should desist from their horrid practice of offering human victims in sacrifice." We have already noticed the charity and mildness displayed by the French clergy in favor of Protestants, at the time of the Massacre of St. Bartho- lomew's day and the Revocation of the Edict of Nantes. We may now make a similar remark concerning the penal statute passed, under the reign of Queen Mary, against her Protestant subjects, in consequence of the provoofttions which she had often experienced from their inordinale zeal NOTES. 531 Motives ot s'ate policy actuated, indeed, the abettors of that rigorous mea- sure; but, tar from being supported by any aroumcnt from ecclesiastical authority, it was on the contrary poweriiilly opposed by Cardinal Pole in the cabinet coiuicil, and even by King Philip's chaplain from the pulpit. V/hen likewise, Eiumanue!, king of Portugal, ordered some violent mea- sures to be resorted to, ap{);irently for the good of religion, the celebrated Jesuit and historian JNIariana observed, that the edict was most repugnant to the laws and statutes ol"the Christian Church, decreium a legibus et insti- tutis Chnstianis abhr^rrens maxima. It was from these sacred statutes and laws, still more than from his own benevolent heart, that Fenelon drew the following bea';tiful maxims and counsels which he addressed to the son of King James U, called the Pre- tender: "Above all, never force your subjects to change their religion. No human power can reach the impenetrable recess of the free will of the heart. Violence can never persuade men ; it serves only to make hypo- crites Grant civil liberty to all, not in approving every tiling as good, nor regarding every tiling as indiiferont, but in tolerating with patience whatever Almighty God tolerates, and endeavoring to convert men by mild persuasion." " Sur toutes choses, ne forcez jamais vos sujets a changer de religion. Nulle puissance humaine ne peut forcer le retranche ment impenetrable de la liberty du Cffiur. La force ne peut jamais persua- der les hommes ; elle ne fait (jue des hypocrites Accordez a tons la tolerance civile, non en approuvant tout comrae indiderent, mais en souf frant avec patience tout ce qae Dieu souri're, et en tachant de ramcner les hommes par une douce persuasion." ( Vie de Fenelon, par Ramsay,/;. 176; or by Cardinal Bausset, vol. in. p. 203). The same benevolent and mild spirit of Catholicity has been also strikingly dis]jlayed on this side of the Atlantic. To prove this, we need merely refer to the history of the settlers of Maryland, the only one of the early British colonies that was founded by a body of Catholics. "Its his- tory," says Bancroft {vol. i, p. 268), "is the history of benevolence, grati- tude and toleration The Jlotnan Catholics, who were oppressed by the laws of England, were sure to find a peaceful asylum in the quiet har- bors of the Chesa[ieake , and there, too, Protestants were shelteied against Protestant intolerance." (See also Wilson, ^iiner. Revol. ch. ii, p. 21). Whilst the Episcopalians of Virginia would sutier no other form of worship than their own ; whilst the Puritans of New England punished with exile, fines, or tortures, the dissenters from their creed, the Catliolics of Maryland alone, instead of imitating the example, invited the suifererL* to come among them, and kindly received into their hospitable colony the victims of intolerance from the other settlements. Nor has the American Catholic of the present »lay degenerated from the maxims of his ancestors. However ready to defend his just rights against all illegal attacks and actual violence, he is equally disposed never to attempt the least unjust aggression against persons of a diiferent creed. How strongly soever attached to his faith, it is only by a fair and mild ex- position of his doctrines that he seeks to vindicate them; being satisfied that the true religion neither needs nor requires to be defended or i)romoted by plots and associations, riots and conflagrations, misrepresentations and calumny; he would be ashamed to use, and he is, above all, careful not to employ such unworthy weapons for the support of so sacre.l a cause. How falsely, then, do the enemies of the Catholic Church ascribe to her a bloody and perseaUing spirit, than which nothing is more contrary to her constant maxims and comluct! Is it not rather evident that the same society to which we are indebted for the preservation of religion, civiliza- tion, literature and learning; for the complete revival of sciences and 532 NOTES. belles-letti'es in the age of Leo X, and their greatest splendor in the age of Louis XIV ; for the most successful exertions in repelling the invasion of barbarians and saving the liberty of our European an es- ters ; for the most useful institutions ; for the most important dis- coveries ; etc., enjoys also the honor of having always maintained the true spirit of Christianity upon earth, and ever practised, to- gether with unshaken adherence to the deposit of faith, that effect- ual benevolence and genuine charity which is so much recommended in the Gospel ? Wonderful Providence of God towards mankind in the institution of his Church, that, whilst she seems to have been established only to promote our spiritual and eternal welfare, she has, moreover, been rendered so zealously active and so vitally instrumental in procuring even our temporal happiness! TABLES OF CONTEMPORAai SOVEREIGNS. N. B. THE DATES MARK THE BEOINNINQ OF EACH REIGN. 45* 6S^ CONTEMPORARY SOVEREIGNS. TABLE I. 1 TABLE »L 1 ROMAX EMPE- iPaRTHIAN KINGS:|i ROMAN EMVE- , PERSIAN KINGS: | B.C. 31 RORS. ARSACIDZS. A. D. RORS. SASSANIDES. Ucesar Aiujus- Phraates. 2.35 Maxiuiin in 226 Artax- tus. erxes I. A.U. 233 Gordian Sapor I. 14 Tiberius. 244 Piiiiip. 18 37 Artabanus. j 24cJ 251 Decius. Gallus. Caligula. 41 Claudius. 1 253 x'Eniilian. 50 54 Vologeses I. j 253 260 Valerian. Galiienus. * Nero. 68 Galba. 268 Claudius IL 69 Otho. 269 Hormisdas L 69 Vitellius. ! 270 Aurelian. 69 i 79 Vespasian. Titus. 273 Varanes I. 275 Tacitus. ! 81 Domitian. 276 Probus Varanes II. 90. ■. Pacorus. 282 Carus. 98 Is erva. 284 Carious and Nu- 98 Trajan. uierian. 107 Chosroes. 284 Diocletian and Maximian. IIT Adrian. 294 305 Narses. Hormisdas IL Constantius 133 Vologeses JI . Chlorus and Gabrius. 138 AntoiiinusPius. 306 1 310 Constantine tlie Great. Sapor II. 161 Marcus Aureli- 337 Constantine II, us Constans and Constantius. 180 Comraodus. 861 Julian. 189 Vologeses III. 363 Jovian. 193 Pertinax. 1 364 Valentinian and 193 Didius Julianus. Valens. ' 379 Gratian, Valen- Artaxerxes II. 193 Septiraius Seve- tinian II, and Sapor III. rus. Tneodosius the Great. TtieeiA- pire is divided. Varanes III. 211 Caracalla. In the West. 214 Artabanus. 395 Honorius. 217 Macrinus. 424 Valentinian III. 218 Heliogabalus. Empire of the 455 Eight short For the contin- Parthians de- reigns (see p. uation, see tabU stroyed in 226. 133). III. 222 Alexander Se- verus. 475 Roiuulus Au- gustulus. IFalloftheWes- . tern empire in 476. CONTEMPORARY SOVEREIGNS. 535 TABLE III. 395 399 EASTERN OR GREEK EMPERORS. Arcadius 408 Theodosius II. 420 440 4.50 457 474 488 491 518 527 531 565 578 579 582 590 602 610 628 632 Marcian. Leo the cian. Zeno. Thra- Anastasius I. Justin I. Justinian I. Justin II. Tiberius II. Mauritius. Phocas. Heraclius. 632 634 641 644 856 661 668 685 711 713 716 717 741 744 Constantine III Constans II. Constantine IV. or Pogonatus. Justinian II. Philippicus. Anastasius II. Theodosius III. Leo the Isau- rian. Constantine V, or Coprony- mus. PERSIAN KiNas: ! SASSANIUES. I TABLE IV. Isdegerdes I. Varanes IV. Isdegerdes II. i Peroses. Balasces. Cabades. Chosroes I. I Hormisdas III. Chosroes II. Si roes. Isdegerdes III, tlie last ol" the Sassanides. Mahomet, the false prophet. Arabian Ca- liphs. Abu-Beker. Qmar. Othinan. Ali. Ommiades. Moavias. 750 754 775 780 785 786 802 809 811 813 820 EASTERN OR GREEK EMPERORS. ARABIAN CA- LIPHS : ABAS- SIDES. Leo Chazarus. Constantine VI and Irene. Nicephorus. 829 833 842 867 886 911 912 Michael I. Leo the Arme- nian. Michael II, the Stammerer Theophilus. 919 959 963 969 97() 1025 After his death, there was a rapid succes-ji sion of twelve 1 1081 caliphs du- 'j ring the spacejl of sixty-fotinj years, terini- j nating in | Mervan, the j last of the ' Omciiades. Michael III. Basil the Mace- donian. Leo the Philoso- pher. Alexander. Constantine VII or Porphyroge- netes. Romanus I, Le- capenes ; and Constant. VII continued. Romanus II. Nicephorus Phocas. John Zimisceg. Basil II— till , Then, after a se- ries of fil'teen emperors, who just appeared and disappear- ed, came Alexius Com- nenus, whose long reigr be lon^s also to to the epoch of the crusades. Abul-Abbas. Abu-Giafar Almanzor. Mohammed — Mahadi. Hadi. Aaron-al-Ras- chid. Amin. Al-Mamon. Mutasem. The succeed- ing caliphs, devoid of per- sonal merit, lost an im- mense portion of their pow-, er, and retain- ed little morej than a certain preeminence of honor. 636 CONTEMPORAIiY SOVEREIGNS. TABLE V. EMPERORS OF GERMANY FROM KINGS OF ENGLAND FROM THE REVIVAL OF THE WES- THE END OF THE HEP- A.D. TERN EMPIRE. TARCHY. House of France. Anglo-Saxon Kings. 800 814 Charlemagne. Louis I, the D^bonnaire. 827 836 840 Egbert. Ethelwolf. Lothaire L 855 Louis n. 857 860 866 871 875 Ethelbald. Ethelbert. Ethelred I. Alfred the Great. Charles the Bald. Interregnum of three years. 880 Charles, the Big. 887 C Arnold. 889 894 I Guy. ( Lambert. 900 Louis IIL ...o*** Edward the Elder. House of Franconia. 912 919 924 936 Henry I, the Fowler. Athelstan. Otho I, the Great. 940 946 955 959 973 Edmund. Edred. Edwy. Edgar. Otho if. 975I 97^ 983 Edward the Martyr. Ethelred II. CONTEMPORARY SOVEREIGN'S. 537 TABLE VL " ■'"> A.D. EMPERORS OF GERMANY. KINGS OF ENG- LAND. KINGS OF FRANCE &om the bcgiiining of the Capelian dynasty. KINGS OF SPAIN, from the time when Castile was erected in- to a kingdom. 987 996 1002 1016 1017 1024 1031 1035 1039 1042 1056 1060 1065 1066 1066 1072 1087 1 House of Bava- ria. Jlnglo- Saxons, continued. Hugh Capet. Robert. Henry I. Ferdinand I. Sanchez. Alfonso I, in Castile, and YI, as king of Leon. Henry II, the Saint. Edmund Iron- side. Danish Kings. Canute the Great. House o/Fran- conia. Conrad II. Harold I Henry III. Hardicanute. Sojcon line re- stored. Edward the Confessor. PhiUp I. Henry IV. Harold II. Norman dynasty. William I, the Conqueror. William II, the Red. 538 CONTEMPORARY SOVEREIGNS. TABLE VII. D.A, 1099 1110 1118 1131 1142 1143 1152 1173 1180 1183 1185 1186 1195 1203 1204 1204 1206 1206 1219 1222 1228 1255 1259 1261 1282 EMPERORS OF COiXSTANTINOPLE Alexius Comnenus. John Comnenus. Manuel Comnenus. Alexius II. Andronic I. Isaac I'Ange Alexius III. Isaac and Alexius IV I'Ange. Alexius V Ducas, or Murzu- phlis. Constantinople taken by the Latins Baldwin I Henry. Peter de Courtenay. Robert de Courtenay. C John of Brienne. I Baldwin II. Constantinople recovered by the Greeks. Michael Paleologus. Andronic 1 1. KINGS or JERUSALEM. Godfrey of Bouillon. Baldwin I. Baldwin II. Foulques of Anjou. Baldwin III. Almeric or Amaury. Baldwin IV. Baldwin V. Guy of Lusignan. Fall of the kingdom of Jerusalem Greek Emperors at Nice. Theodorus Lascaris I. John Ducas Vatace. Theodorus Lascaris II C John Lascaris. I Michael Paleologus. CONTEMPORAKY SOVEREIGXvS. 539 TABLE VIII. EMPERORS OF GERMANY. House of Franco- nia. IIOO! 1106 Henry V. 1108 1109 1125JLothaire II, the I Saxon. 1126! 1135 1137 KINGS OF ENG- LAND. KINGS OF FRANCE. Norman dynasty. Henry I, Capeiian dynasty. Louis VI, Big. 1138 Conrad III. 1152 1154 1157 1158 1180 1189 1190 1198 1199 1214 1216 1217 1218 1223 1226 125'3 1252 1256 1270 1272 1273 1284 1285 1292 129: House of Suabia. Frederic I, Bar- barossa. Henry VI. ' Philip. Otlio IV. Frederic 11. ( Conrad IV. ^William of ( Holland. Interregnum. Anarchy. House of Blois. Stephen. Plantagenets undivided. Henry II. Richard I, Coeur de Lion. John, Lackland. Heniyni.**'" the KINGS OF SPAIN House of Bigorre Alfonso VII. House ofBurgtaX' dy. Alfonso VIII. Louis VII, the Younger. Philip II, Augus- tus. Sanchez III an^i Ferdinand II Alfonso IX. Louis VIII, Li- on-hearted. Louis IX, or St. Louis. Rodolph I of Hapsburg. Adolph of Nas. sau. Edw8urd I. Philip III, the Bold. Philip IV, the Fair. Henry I. Ferdinand Illf (St.) Alfonso X, the Wise. Sanchez IV iFerdinand IV. 5i0 CONTEMPORARY SOVEREIGNS. TABLE IX. A.D. EMPERORS OF CONSTANTINOPLE. OTTOMAN SULTANS. 1300 1326 1328 1341 1360 1389 1391 1402 1406 1413 1421 1425 1448 1451 1481 1512 1520 1566 1574 1595 1603 1617 1618 1623 1640 1648 1687 Othman. Orcan. Amurat I. Bajazet I, Ilderim. Soliman I. Musa. Mahomet 1. Amurat II. Mahomet 11. Bajazet II. Selim I. Soliman II, the Magnificent. Selim II. Amurat III. Mahomet III. Achmet I. Mustapha I. Osman I. Amurat IV. Ibrahim. Mahomet IV. Soliman III. Andronic III. C John Cantacuzene and I John Paleologus I. Manuel Paleologus. John Paleologus II. Constantine Paleologus, or Dra- gazes. Fall of the Greek Empire. CONTEMPORARY SOVEREIGNS. 641 TABLE X. A.D. EMPERORS OF GERMANY. 1298 1307 1308 1312 1314 [1316 il322 1327 1328 1347 1350 1364 Albert I of AuS' tria. Henry VII of Luxemburg {Frederic of Austria. Louis of Ba- varia. House of Lux- emhurg. Charles IV. 1368 1377 1378 Wenceslaus. 13791 1380 1390 1399 1400 14061 1410 1413 ll422 Robert, Count Palatine. Sigismond. 1438 11440 |l454 1461 1 1474 !l483 1485 1493 i4f;8 1504 1509 Ilouae of Austria Albert II. Frederic III. Maximilian I. 48 KINGS or ENG- LAND. Plantagenets. Edward II. Edward III. Richard II. House of Lan- caster. Henry IV. Henry V. Henry VI. House of York. Edward IV. C Edward V... ^Richard III. House of Tudor. Henry VII. KINGS OF FRANCE. Capetians, KINGS OF SPAIN. Louis X. John I. Philip V Charles IV. House of Valois Philip VI. John II Charles V, the Wise. Charles VI. Charles VII. Louis XI. Charles VIII. Valois- Orleans. Louis Xll. Henry VIII. House of Bur- gundy. Alfonso XI. Pedro the Cruel Henry II, Tran- stamare Juan I. Henry III. Juan II. Henry IV. Isabella and Ferdinand V. Castile and Ar ragon united. Philip 1 of Austria, and Ferdinand V of Arrasron. 542 CONTEMPORARY SOVERP^IGN'S. 1 1 TABLE XI. A.D. OTTOMAN SUL- TANS. EMPERORS AND EMPRESSES OF RUSSIA. KINGS OF PRUSSIA. PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES. 1689 1691 1695 1701 1702 1713 1725 1727 1780 1740 1741 1754 1757 1762 1774 1786 1789 1796 1797 1801 1807 1808 1809 1817 1825 1829 1837 1839 1840 1841 1845 1849 Peter I, the Great. Frederic I. Frederic Wil- liam I. Frederic II, the Great. Frederic Wil- liam II. Washington, first president. John Adams. Jeiferson. Madison. Monroe. John Quincy Adams. Jackson. Van-Buren. Harrison, Tyler. Polk. Taylor, Fillmore.' Pierce. Achmet II. Mustapha II. Achmet III. Catherine I. Peter II. Anne I wan Mahomet V, or Mahmoud I. Elizabeth. Peter Il-Cathe- rine II, the Great Osman II. Abdul-Hamid. Selim III. Paul. Frederic Wil- liam III. Alexander. Mahmoud II. Nicholas. Abdul Medjid. Frederic Wil- Uam IV, 1853' 1855 1857 1861 1865 Alexander 11. Buchanan. Lincoln. Johnson. Abdul Aziz. William 1. CONTEMPORARY SOVEREIGNS. 543 ■ TABLE XII. A.r> EMPERORS OF GER- MANY. KINGS AND QUEENS OF ENGLAND. KINGS OF FRANCE. KINGS OF SPAIN. 151.5 House of Jiustria, continued. 1 House of Tudor, continued. Valois — Angou- lenie. Francis I. House of Austria. Charles I; same as Charles V in Germany. Philip II. Philip III. Philip IV. Charles II. House of Boujbcm Philip V. 1516 1519 /1 547 Charles V. Edward VI Mary. Henry II. 155.S 1556 1558 1559 1560 1564 1574 1576 1589 1598 1603 1610 1612 1619 1621 16?5 Ferdinand I. Elizabeth. Francis II. Charles IX. Henry III. House of Bourbon Henry 'IV, the Great. Maximilian II. Rodolph II. House of Stuart. James I. Louis XIII. Matthias. Charles I. Louis XIV, the Great. 1637 1643 1649 1658 1660 1665 1685 1689 1700 1702 1705 1711 1714 1715 1727 1740 Ferdinand III. Commonwealth. Cromwell, pro- tector. Restoration. Charles II. James II. — Revo- lution. C Mary and { William III. Anne. House of Hanover or Brunsvnck. George I. Louis XV. Charles VI. Charles VII, of George II. 544 CONTEMPORARY SOVEREIGNS. TABLE XII.— CONTINUED. A. D. 1745 1746 1759 1760 1765 1774 1788 1790 1792 1793 1799 1804 1806 1808 1814 1820 1824 1830 1833 1835 1837 1843 1848 1852 KMPERORS or GER- MANY. House of Lor- raine. Francis I. Joseph II. Leopold II. Francis II. Empire oj Aus- tria, Francis. Ferdinand. Francis Joseph. KINGS AND QUEENS OF ENGLAND. House of Hanover or Brunswick George III. George IV. William IV. Victoria. KINGS OF FRANCE. House of Bourbon Louis XVI. Revolution. Republic. Louis XVII. Napoleon, First Consul. Napoleon, Empe- ror. Restoration. Louis XVIII. Charles X. Branch of leans. Louis Philip. Or- KINGS ANE qnCCHI OF SPAIN. House of Bourbon Ferdinand VI. Charles III. Charles IV. Forced abdication Spain invaded. Ferdinand VII. Civil war and Re- volutions. Regency of Queen Christina — Then, of Espar tero. Isabella. New Revolution and Reptihlic. Louis Napoleon, President. Louis Napoleon, or Napoleon IIL Emperor. CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE or MEMOEABLE EVENTS AND REMARKABLE PERSONAGES. N. B. The dates in the first column, denote the years in wliich the events happened ; — those placed in the second column, mark the years in which the persons mentioned there, died. PART I. B. C. MEMORABLE EVENTS. 31 Battle of Actium. 29 Chan2;e of the Roman Repub- lic into an Empire. 20 Roman Ensigns recovered from the Parthians. 8 Temple of Janus shut. BIRTH OF CHRIST. k. D. 4 Conspiracy of Cinna. 9 Defeat of Varus in Germany. 15 German War. 31 Conspiracy of Sejanus. 33 Passion of our Saviour — De- scent of the Holy Ghost — Foundation of the Church. 43 Invasion of Great Britain. 60 Conquest of Armenia. 64 First persecution against the Church. 80 Siege and destruction of Jeru- salem. 79 Eruption of Mount Vesuvius. 93 Second persecution. 106 Third persecution. 136 Final overthrow of th 2 Jews. 162 Fourth persecution. 46* B. C. REMARKABLE PERSONAGES. Cicero — Sallust — Varro — Cornelius Nepos, died about this time, or a little before. Young Marcellus died, b. c. 23— Virgil, poet, 19 — Agrippa, general, 12 — Drusus, general, 9 — Horace, poet, 8 — Maecenas, statesman, 8. A. D. Livy, historian, died A. d. 17 — Ovid, poet, 17 — Arminius, general, — Ger« manic\]s, 19 — Strabo, geo^^rapher, 25 — liivia, empress, 29 — Velleius- Paterculus, historian, S 1— Phaedrus, fabulist, . . . .^Quintus Curtius, historian, . . . . — Philo, Jewish doctor. . . . Persir.s, poet, 62 — Lucan, poet, 65— Seneca, piiilosopher, 65 — Corbulo, general, 66> — Suetonius-Paulinus —St. Peter and St. Paul, Apostles, 67. Pliny, the Elder, naturalist, 79— Agricola, general, 93 — Joscphus, historian,. . . . — Quintilian, rheto- rician- • • • — St. John, tlie Evange- list, 101 — St. Ignatius, bishop and 546 CimONOLOGICAL TABLE. A. D. MEMORABLE EVENTS. 174 Miracle of the Thundering Le- gion. 193 The empire put up at auction. 197 Battle of Lyons between Seve- rus and Albinus. 202 Fifth persecution. 226 Fadl of the Parthian empire — New kingdom of Persia. 235 Sixth p€:rsecution. 249 Seventh persecution. 257 Eigth persecution. 260 Captivity of Valerian. 262 Universal and dreadful pesti- lence. 273 Destruction of Palmyra. 275 Ninth persecution. 286 Martyrdom of the Theban Le- gion. 303 Tenth and last general perse- cution, the most bloody of all. EEMARKABLE PERS0VAOK8. martyr, 107 — Tacitus, historian . , . . — Pliny the Younger . . — Ju- venal, poet, 128 — Plutarch, histo- rian, 140 — Justin, historian. . . . St. Polycarp, bishop of Smyrna and martyr, 166 — St. Ju^tir, martyr, 167. Between 140 and 180, died itolemy, the astronomer — Arrian, the histo- rian, and Lucian, the satirist. Galenus, physician, about 200. St. Irenapus, bishop of Lyons, 202 — Clement of Alexandria, doctor, 216 — Tertullian, about 220. Dio-Cassius, historian, about 230. St. Cornelius, pope and martyr, 252 — Origen, 253 — St. Cyprian, arch- bishop of Carthage, 258 — St. Law- rence, martyr, 258. Plotinus, philosopher, 270 — Longi- nus, rhetoriciEin, 273 Zenobia, queen. PART II. 312 323 .'J25 330 351 363 378 381 388 390 394 395 402-5 Victory of Constantine over Maxentius Triumph of Christianity. Licinius repeatedly defeated and finally overthrown by Constantine. First General Council, at Nice. Foundation of Constantinople. Battle of Mursa. The attempt of Julian to re- build the temple of Jerusa- lem, defeated by a splendid prodigy — His campaign and death in Persia. Battle of Adrianople. Second General Council at Constantinople. Defeat and death of the usur- per Maximus. Fault and repentance of Theo- dosius. Miraculous victory of Theodo- sius over Eugenius and Ai'- bogastes. Final division of the empire. Defeat of the Goths in Italy. Arnobius, rhetorician and doctor, about 320. Lactantius, historian and doctor about 328. Eusebius, historian and controvertial, 338 or 339. St. Hilary, bishop of Poitiers, 368— St. Athanasius, Patriarch of Alex- andria, 373 — St. Basil, archbishop of Caesarea, 379. Between 364 and 394, died the his- torians Eutropius, Ammianus Mar cellinus and Aurelius Victor. St. Cyril, archbishop of Jerusalem, 386 — St. Gregory Nazianzen, arch- bishop of Constantinople, 389— St. Gregory, bishop of Nyssa, 396. Rufinus, statesman. 395 — St. Am brose, archbishop of Milan, 397— St. Epiphanius, archbishop of Salamis, 403 — St John Chrysos- torn., archbishop of Constantinople, CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE. 547 A. D. 406-9 no 418 420 421 430 431 438 451 451 452 455 455 472-3 476 MEMORABLE EVENTS. Ganl and Spain invaded by the Vandals and other bar- barians. Rome taken and phindered by the Goths. They settle in the Southerii provinces of Gaul. Beginning of" the French mo- narchy. Roman troops entirely with- drawn from Great Britain — Inroads of the Picts and Scots. Africa subdued by the Vandals. Third General Council, at Ephe- sus. Publication of the Theodosian code. Ravages of the Huns — Battle of the Catalaunian plains. Fourth General Council, at Chalcedon. Pope St. Leo before Attila — Foundation of Venice. Rome plundered by the Van- dals. First establishment of the An- flo-Saxons in Great Britain, pain conquered by the Visi- goths. Fadl of the Western empire. REMARKABLE PERSONAGES. 407 — Stilico, general and states- man, 408. Alaric, king of the Goths, 410 — Ru- linus of Aquileia, historian, 410 — Prudentiiis, poet, 410 — Claudian, poet; and Macrobius, historian, about 415. Sulpitius-Severus, historian, 420. St. Jerora, doctor of the Church, 420 — Constantitis, general and states- man, 421 — St. Augustine, bishop of Hippo, 430. Count Boniface, general, 432. Socrates, historian, about 440 — St Cyril, patriarch of Alexandria, 444 — St. Peter Chrysologus, arch- bishop of Ravenna, 450 — Sozorflen, historian, about 450. St. Pulcheria, empress, 453 — Attila, king of the Huns, 453 iEtius, general, 454. St. Patrick, apostle of Ireland, about 460. Theodoret, bishop of Cyre, 458 — St. Leo the Great, pope, 461. Ricimer, general and statesman, 472 Genseric, king of the Vandals, 477. PART III 486-96 Conquests of the Franks in Gaul — Their conviersion to Christianity. 489-93 Ostrogoths in Italy. 526 Tremendous earthquakes Overthrow and rebuilding of Antioch. 529 Justinian code. 532 First use of the Christian era in ItaLy. 534 Kingdom of the Vandals de- stroyed. 551 Silk manufacture brought from India to Europe. 553 Fifth General Council at Con- stantinople. 553-4 Kingdom of the 'Ostrogoths destroyed — Battle cf Casi- lina St. Sidonius Apollinaris, bishop of Clermont, 482 — Evaric, king of the Visigoths, 484— Odoacer, Icing of Italy, 493. Clovis, king of the Franks, 511 — Boetius, philosopher and states- man, 524 — Theodoric, king of the Ostrogoths, 526 — Amalasontes, queen, 535. St. Fulgentius, bishop of Rusp, 533. Dionysius Exiguus, tlie monk, 540 — St. Benedict, founder of the £ene« dictine order, 543. Totila and Teias, kings of the OstrO" goths, 553-54. 548 CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE. A. P. MEMORABLE EVENTS. 568 The Lombards in Italy— Exar- . chate of Ravenna remains to the Greeks. 576 BatUeofMelitine— Signal de- ^feat of the Persians. 584 ^Extraordinary inundations in Italy. 687 Conversion of the Visigoths to the true faith. 592 Bloody revolutions in Persia. 597 Anglo-Saxons begin to embrace Christianity. 602 Tragical end of the emperor Mauritius and his family. 614-15 Ravages of the Persians in Syria and Palestine. 622, etseq. Exploits of Heraclius against the Persians. 622 Rise of JVIahometanism. 6'M Saracens invade Syria. 636 Persia. 637 Palestine, 639 Mesopotamia. 640 Egypt. 641 Burning of the Alexandrian library- 651 Extinction of the second Per- sian monarchy. 673 Invention of the Grecian fire — Siege of Constantinople du- ring seven years. 680 Sixth General Council, at Con- stantinople. 697 Northern Africa, subjugated by the Saracens — Desti'uction of Cartilage. 711 Invasion of Spain — Battle of Xeres, which put an end to the kingdom of the Visigoths. 718 Saracens defeated by land and sea, near Constantinople. 732 Battle of Tours— New defeat of the Saracens — Germany receives ihe light of the Gos- pel. 752 Merovingian family succeeded on the throne of France by the Dynasty of Carlovingian , kings-Exarchate of Ravenna conquered by the Lombards. 756 Temporal dominion of the Popes. 756 Foundation of the kingdom of Cordova in Spain. 763 Excessive cold and heat. REMARKABLE PERS0NACE8. Cassiodorus, statesman and doctor 562 — Procopius, Historian^ Beli sarius, general, 565 — Narses. ge« neral, 56S. Alboin, king of the Lombards, 574. Evagrius, historian — St. Gregory of Tours, historian, 595 — St. Gregory the Great, pope, 604 — St. Augus- tine, first archbishop of Canter- bury, 607. Fortunatus, poet, 609. St. Isidore, arclibishop of Seville, 636 — St. Soplironius, patriarch ot Je- rusalem, 63S. About the middle of the 7th century, four celebrated Mussulmen gene- rals, Abu-Obeyda,* Kaled, Amrou, Saad. Shortly after, four others, Moavias, Oucba, Zuheir, Assan. Callinicus, chemist, about 675. Pepin Heristel, statesman and gene- ral, 714. Venerable Bede, doctor and histo- rian, 735 — Charles-M artel, duke of France, 741 — Luitprand, king ol the Lombards, 743 — St. Zachaiy, pope, 752. • St. Boniface, apostle of Germany, 755. Pepin, king of France. 768. CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE. 549 A. r. 774 767 796 800 MEMORABLE EVENTS. Extinction of the kingdom of the Lombards. Seventh General Council, at Nice. The Saxons subdued, and the Avari prostrated by tlie arms of (Charlemagne. Charlemagne c/owned emperor of the West. REMARKABLE PERSONAGES. St. John Damascene, doctor of the Church, 780. Adrian I, pope, 795 Witikind, Saxon general, about 800 PART IV. The emperor Nicephorus de- feateu and slain by the Bul- garians. End of the English Heptarchy. Battle of Fontenay. Commencement of the Greek schism. Eighth General Council, at Con- stantinople. King Alfred compelled to take refuge in a small island ; then defeats the Danes, and re- covers his kingdom. Imperial crown transferred from the French to the German princes — Noi'mans take pos- session of Neustria. Battle of Jonquera — Christians of Spain defeated by the Moors. Battle of Simancas — Moors de- feated by the Christians. Battle of Mersburg; Hunga- rians completely defeated by Otho I. TroiiiC'tidous battle of Drista between the Greeks and the Russians. Fatimites in Egypt. Capetian kings in France. — Invention of clocks with ba- lance. — Golhic Cathedrals. Normans in Italy. Invention of the Gamut, or scale of musical notes. First coiicjuests of the Selju- kian Turl^s. The kingcioms of Castile and Airago]! begin. Renewal ol" the Gieck schism by Miciiael Ceeruiarius Paul of Aquileia, historian, 801. Alcuin, doctor, 804. Eginhard, historian, about 842. Rabanus, archbishop of Mentz, 856 — Lupus, abbot of Ferrieres, doc- — tor, S62 — Paschasius Radbertus, doctor, 865. Anastasius, the librarian, 880. Photius, first author of the Greek schism, about 892 — Alphonso 111, king of Oviedo in Spain, 912. Rollo, Norman chieftain, 932. Abderame IH, king of Cordova, 961 — St. Bruno, archbishop of Co- logne and statesman, 965 — Flodo- ardus, historian, 966. Fernando Gonzalez, count, sovereign of Castile, 979 — Mahomet Alman- zor, Saracen general, 9.98. Sylvester II, (Gerbert), pope. lOOa Guy, monk of Arezzo, about 1025 Fulbert, bishop of Chartres, 102-9 550 CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE. A. D. MEMORAnLE EVENTS. 1066 Battle of Hasting^s ; England conquered by the Normans. 1085 Toledo taken from the Sara- cens. 1095 Rise of the kingdom of Portu- gal. REMARKABLE PERSONAGES. St. Peter Damian, cardinal and doo tor, 1072. St. Gregory VII, (Hildebrand), pope 1085 — Lanfrancus, archbishop ol Canterbury, 10S9. Rodriguez Diaz-de-Bivar, (El Cid) general, about 1095. PART V. 1095 Council of Clermont— First Crusade. 1097 Siege of Nice, and battle of Dorylaeum. 1098 Siege of Antioch, and battle of Orontes. 1099 Siege of Jerusalem, and battle of Ascalon. Kingdom of Jerusalem. Knighlf Hospitallers of St. Johij. 1118 Knights-Templars. 1147 Second Crusade. 1169 British enter Ireland. 1170 Military order of St. James. 11S7 The Christians defeated by Saladin in the battle of Ti- berias. Fall of the Kingdom of Jeru- salem. 1188 Third Crusade. 1190 Teutonic Order. 1196 Fourth Crusade. 1200 Fifth Crusade. 1204 Latin empire of Constantino- ple. 1212 Prodigious victory of the Christians of Spain over the Moors at Murandal. 1214 Battle of Bouvjnes, in which Philip Augustus conquers all his enemies. 1217 Sixth Crusade. 1220 Battle of the Jaxartes, be- tween Genghis-Kan and Sultan Mohammed. 1230 Opposite parties of the Guelfs, and Gibelins in Italy. — Ma- " riner's compass, invented some time before, began to be used. 1248 Seventh Crusade- Adhdmar de Monteil, bishop of Puy, A. D. 1098. Urban II, pope, 1099. — St. Bruno, founder of the Carthusian Order, 1101. — Raymond, count of Tou- louse, 1105. — Robert, earl of Flan- ders ; and Bohemond, prince of Tarentum and Antioch, 1111. — Tancred, warrior, 1112. — Peter' the Hermit, 1115. — Robert, duke of Normandy, 1134. William of Malmesbury, historian, towards 1150. — Suger, abbot of St Denis, 1152. — St. Bernard, abbot of Clairvaux, 1153. Nouradin, conqueror, 1174. — Alex. ander III, pope, 1181. — William, archbishop of Tyre, historian, about 1191. — Saladin, conqueror, 1193. — Dandolo, doge of Venice, 1205. — Averroes, Arabian philoso. pher, 1206. Maimonides, Jewish rabbin, 1209. Villehardoin, historian, 1212. Innocent III, pope, 1216. Simon of Montford, general, 1218. St. Dominic, founder of the Domini cans, 1221. St. Francis of Assisium, founder of the Franiiiscans, 1226. Genghis Kan, Mogul conqueror, 1227 CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE. 551 \. D. 1250 1258 1261 1268 12T0 MEMORABLE EVENTS Captivity of St. Louis. Bagdad taken by the Moguls; end of the Arabian Cali- phate. Fall of the Latin Empir-* of Constantinople. Eighth and last Crusade. Death of St. Louis. REMARKABLE PERSONAGES. Blanche of Castile, queen. 1252. Matthew Paii^, liistoriau, 1259. PART VL 1291 Final overthrow of the Chris- tian power in Syria — Inven- tion of gun-powder about this time ; — also, according to many, of the magnifying glass and spectacles. 1300 Rise of the Ottoman Empire. 1308 Commencement of Swiss in- dependence. 1310 Conquest of Rhodes by the Knights of St. John. 1.312 Suppression of the Knights Templars. 1313 Battle of Bannockburn, in which the Scots signally defeated the English. 1315 Battle of Morgarten, which secured the independence of Switzerland. 1340 Awful and complete over- throw of the Moors at Ta- rifa. 1348 Universal and dreadful pesti- lence. 1340 Battles of Sluys, 1346 Crecy, Nevil's Cross, 1356 Poitiers, 1367 Navarette. 1372 English fleet destroyed' by the Spaniards near La Rochelle. 1396 Signal defeat of the Christians, at Nicopolis. 1397 Treaty of Calmar for the union of Denmark, Sweden and Norway. 1402 Tremendous battle of Ancyra between Sultan Bajazet I and Tamerlane. 1429 Siege of Orleans. 1440 Invention of the art of print- ing. y >..■£ e c St. Thomiw Aquinas and St. Bona- yenture, doctors of the v-luirch, 1274. Charles of Anjou, conque*-or of Na- ples and Sicily, 1285. Roger Bacon, matheir.?»tician, astro- nomer, etc., 1294. William Tell, warrior. Joinville, historian, 1318 Dantc, poet, 1321 — Robert Bruce, king of ScoUand, 1329. Petrarch, poet, 1374-Edward, prince of Wales, 1377 Bertrand dq Guesclin, general, 1380. Tamerlane, the Tartar conqueror, 1405. Margaret, queen of Sweden and Den- mark, 1412. 652 CHKONOLOGICAL TABLE. A. r. 1450 1453 1456 1461 1480 1492 MFMORABLE EVENTS. 1453 rhe Kn^Hsh defeated at Vourmigny and Cha- llilon — Lose their pos- sessions in Franco. Fall of Constantinople. Siege of Belgrade — Mahomet repulsed with great loss. Destruction of the empire of Trebisond. First siege of Rhodes. Extinction of the power of the Moors in Spain. REMARKABLE PERSONAGES. Joan d'Arc, the maid of Orleans, 1431. Hunniades, general, 1456. Scanderbeg, king of Albania, 1467 Guttemberg, Faust, ShoefFer, first printers. -, » Thomas-a-Kempis, 1471. Warwick, general, 1471 — Margaret of Anjou, queen of England, 1482, Matthias Corvinus, king of Hungar)*, 1490. PAJIT VII. 1492 1497 1497 1509 1515 1517 1517 1519' 1521" 1522 1625 1529 1530 1531 « 1534 i 1534 1534 1545 1556 1557 155S Discovery of America. Discovery of the Northern American continent. Discovery of the Cape of Good Hope. liCague of Cambray. Battle of Marignan. The Protestant Reformation. Egypt subdued by the Turks. ■ First circumnavigation of the globe. Conquest of Mexico. Second siege of Rhodes. Battle of Pavia; Francis I taken prisoner. First siege of Vienna by the Turks. Malta ceded to the Knights of St. John. Conquest of Peru. England separates from the See of Rome. Foundation of the Order of the Jesuits. Opening of the Council of Trent, the last general coun- cil. Abdication of Charles V. The French defeated by the Spaniards, at St. Quentin. The French recover Calais from the English. Picus, prince of Mirandola, 1494 — Peter d'Aubusson, grand-master of the Order of St. John, 1503— Christopher Columbus, 1506 Gonzalez of Coruova, general, 1512 — Bramante, architect, 1514 — Albuquerque the Great, con- queror of the East Indies, 1515 — Ximenes, cardinal and statesman, 1517 — Magellan, 1520 — Leo X (Medicis), pope, 1521--Emmanuol the Great, king of Portugal, 1521 Bayard, wariior, 1524 — Vasco de Gama, 1525. Zuinglius, 1531 — Ariosto, poet, 1533 V/olsey, cardinal, statesman, 1533 Vlliiers de I'lsle Adam, grand-master of the Order of St. John, 1534 — Cajetan, cardinal, di- vine, 1534 — ^ — Fisher, bishop of Rochester, and Thomas Moore, chancellor, 1535 — Erasmus, divine, 153i) — Garcilaso de la Vega, poet, 1536--Guicciardini, historian, 1540. Francis Pizarro, conqueror, 1541 — Copernicus, astronomer, 1543 — Luther, 1546— Hei'nando Cortez, conqueror, 1547 — St. Francis Xa- vier, the apostle of East-Indies and Japan, 1552 — St. Ignatius of Loyola, founder of the society of Jesus, 1556 — Pole, cardinal, 1558 — Julius Scaiiger, physician, phi- losopher, etc., 1558 Cranraer, 1556 — Robert Stephen, printer, 1559— Calvin, 1564. CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE. 553 MEMORABLE EVENTS. Siege of Malta. Battle of Lepanto. Massacre of St. Bartholomew's clay. Portugal annexed to Spain. Republic of Holland pro- claimed. Reformation of the Calendar. Unjust execution of Mary Stuart, queen of Scotland. Defeat of the Spanish Armada. Invention of the telescope by Jansen. Invention of the thermometer and the microscope by Dreb- bel. Invention of the barometer by Torricelli. Beginning of the English and French settlements in North America. F'^undation of New Amster- dam, or New York. Foundation of Boston. Foundation of the colony of Maryland. Treaty of Westphalia. King Charles I beheaded. — Commonwealth in England. Battle of Dunes. 4T REMARKABLE PERSONAGES. Michael Angelo, painter and arciii« tect, 1564~\'ida, poet, 1566— John la Valette, grand-master of St. John, 156S— S. Pius V, pope, 1572— D. Juan of Austria, general, 1578 — Camoens, poet, 1579 — Ferdinand Alvarez, duke of Alva, general, 1582 — St. Theresa, foundress of the Carmelites, 1582— St. Charles Borromeo, archbishop of Milan, 1584— Gregory XIII, pope, 1585 — F. Louis Granada, divine, 1588 — Sixtus V, pope, 1590. Alexander Farnesius, duke of Parma, general, 1592 — Tasso, poet, 1595 — Drake, admiral, 1596. Tyco-Brahe, astronomer, 1601 — Ba- ronius, cardinal, historian, 1607- - Joseph Scaliger, historian, poet, etc., 1609 — Casaubon, historian, divine, etc., 1614 — F. Alfonso Rodriguez, divine, 1616 — Shaks- peare, dramatic poet, 1616 — Cer- vantes, Spanish writer, about the same time — Suarez, divine, 1617 — Duperron, cardinal, controver- tist, 1618 — Bellarmine, cardinal, controvertist, 1621 — St. Francis of Sales, founder of the Visitation. 1622— Mariana, histonan, 1624. Herrera, historian, 1625 Bacon, philosopher, divine, 1626. Kepler, astronomer, 1630 — Spinola, genera], 1630-Tilly, general, 1632- Gustavus Adolphus, King of Swe- den, 1632-Walstein, general, 1634. Cornelius a Lapide, divine, 1637 — Jansenius, 1638 — Rubens, painter, 1640— Sully, statesman, 1641 — Richelieu, cardinal, statesman, 1642 — Galileo, astronomer, 1642 — Bentivoglio, historian, 1644 — Gro- tius, civilian, divine, 1645 — Gerard Vossius, historian, 1649 — Descar- tes, metaphysician, philosopher, 1650 — Montrose, general, 1650 — Petavius, divine, historian, etc., 1652-Van-Tromp, admiral, 1653- Usher, historian, 1655 — Gassendi, mathematician, philosopher, 1655 — Blake, admiral, 1657 — Harvey, physician, 1657 — St Vincent of 554 CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE. A. D. MEMORABLE EVENTS. 1659 Treaty of Pyrenees between France and Spain. 1669 Conquest of Candia by the Turks. 1672 Invasion of Holland by the French. 167-4 Battle of Senef. 1674 C Brilliant campaigns of Turen- 1^75 ( ne in Alsace and Germany. 1676 Sea-fights near Messina be- tween the French and the Dutch. 1679 Peace of Nimeguen. l-*^80 Foundation of Charleston. 1682 Foundation of Philadelphia. 1 683 Second siege of Vienna ; Turks repelled with immense loss. 1685 Revocation of the Edict of Nantes. 1686 League of Augsburg. 1688 Revolution in England. it)90 Battle of Boyne in Ireland. {Naval battles of La Manche and La Hogue ; French vic- torious in the first, defeated in the second. 1692 ^ Splendid victories of Marshal ,^Qq\ Luxembourg over the allies "^ f at Steinkirk and Nerwinde. 1697 Peace of Riswick between France, England, Germany and Spain. 1697 Decisive battle of Zenta in favor of the Austrians against the Turks. 1699 Peace of Carlowitz, between the Ottoman Porte, Austria, Venice and Poland. 1700 Eight thousand Swedes defeat eighty thousand Muscovites near Nai'va. 1701 War for the succession of Spain. 1704 The French and their allies, defeated at Hochstadt. 1706 Ramilies and Turin. 1708 Oudenarde. 1709— Malplaquet. 1707 Victorious at Almanza. 1710 Villa- Viciosa. 1712 Denain. 1713 Peace of Utrecht. REMARKABLE PERSONAGES. Paul, founder of the Lazarists, and ' of the sisters of charity, 1660— Mazarin, cardinal statesman, 1661 — Pascal, mathematician, etc., 1662 — BoUandus, historian, 1665 — Anne of Austria, queen, 1666 — Moliere, dramatist, 1673 — Milton, poet, lb74— — Turenne, general, 1675 — Kiuperli, general and states- man, 1676 — Ruyter, admiral, 1676 — Monk, general, 1679— Montecu- culli, general, 1680 Bernini, architect and sculptor, 1680 — Col- bert, statesman, 1683 — Corneille, dramatist, 1684 — Prince of Condnon, 1719 — Marlborough, general, 1722 — Kang Hi, Chinese emperor, 1722 — Prideaux, historian, 1724 — New- ton, astronomer, 1727 — Daniel, his- torian, 1728 — Scheli'macher, con- trovertist, 1733 — Villars, general, 1734 — Ferreras, historian, 1735 — Prince Eugene of Savoy, general, 1736 — Boerhaave, physician, 173S — Polignac, divine and statesman, 1739. Rollin, historian, 1741 — J. B. Rous- seau, poet, 1741 — Montfaucon, his- torian and divine, 1741 — Halley, astronomer, 1742 — Massillon, bish- op of Clermont, 1743 — Pope, poet, 1744 — Thamas Kouli Kan, the Per- sian conqueror, 1747 — Bernouilli, mathematician, 1748 Thomson, poet, 1748 — Count Saxe, general, 1750 — Calmet, divide, 1757-Bene- dict XIV, pope, 1758-Wolf, Mont- calm, generals, 1759. Clairaut, mathematician, 1765. Goldsmith, historian, poet, etc., 1776 —Hume, 1776 William Pitt, Lord Chatham, statesman, 1778 — Lebeau, historian, 1778 — Voltaire — J. J. Rousseau, 1778 — Linnaeus, naturalist, 1778 — Warburton, di- vine, 1779— Cook, the navigator, 1779 — Maria Theresa, empress, 1780 — Blackstone, civilian, 1780 — Alban Butler, biographer, 1782 — Berthier, historian, divine, 1782 — Euler, mathematician, 1783. 556 CHKONOLOGICAL TABLE. PART VIII. A. D 1783 1787 1789 17R7 1793 1789 1792 1792 179S 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797' 1793 MEMORABLE EVENTS. Balloons invented by Mont- golfier. During the following years of this and the next century, great progress of the natural sciences, chemistry, minera- logy, geology, natural his- tory ; invention of rail-roads, steam-boats, etc. Formation of the Federal Constitution of the United States. Federal government carried into operation — Washing- ton unanimously elected president. Turkey and Poland humbled and almost prostrated by the arms of the Russians, French revolution — Persecu- tion against the clergy and nobles — Emigration. Battles of Jemmapes and Val- my; the Austrians and Prussians repelled from the French territory. Death of Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette on a scaf- fold. The first general coalition against France. Battle of Fleurus — Fall of the tyrant Robespierre. Total dismemberment of Po- land Holland conquered by the French-^The Direc- tory — Rise of Napoleon Bo- naparte. 'Brilliant campaign of Bona- Earte in Italy — Victories of lodi, Areola, Rivoli — Cap- ture of Mantua — Treaty of Campo-Formio— Extinction of the Venetian republic. Ecclesiastical State occupied by the French — Pope Pius VI dragged into captivity and exile. Second coalition against France. REMARKABLE PEKSONAa^S. Dr. Johnson, 1784 — Greene, general 1786. Buifon, naturalist, 1788. FrankUn, philosopher and statesman, 1790 — Bergier, divine, 1790 — Laudon, general, 1790 — Roman- zow, general, 1790. Rodney, admiral, 1792 Mozartj uuisical composer, 1792 — Robert- son, historian, 1793 — Gibbon, 1794 — Lavoisier, chemist, 1794. Wayne, general, 1796— Burke, states- man, 1797. CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE. 657 MEMORABLE EVENTS. ' Expedition of Bonaparte in Egypt — Battle of the Pyra- mids and Aboukir. Bonaparte, on his return to Paris, becomes the head of government under the title of Consul — Kingdom of Na- ples subdued by the French, who are soon after driven from Italy by Suwarrow. Election of a new pope — Sit- ting of the American Con- gress at Washington for the first time — Invention of the Galvanic battery — Battle of Marengo — Exploits of Gen- eral Moreau in Germany — Malta surrenders to the English. V French evacuate Egypt Peace of Luneville between France and Austria. Treaty of Amiens between England and France — Re- establishment of the Catho- lic worship in France, in virtueof aconcordate passed the year before. San-Domingo entirely lost to the French — Republic of Hayti. Napoleon crowned emperor. Third coalition — French and Spanish fleets destroyed at Trafalgar by Admiral Nel- son. Signal victories of the French At Austferiitz, over the Aus- trians. . . .Jena, over the Prussians. . . .Friedland, over tlie Rus- sians. Treaty of Tilsit. ( Invasion of Portugal and Spain * by tlie French— Their defeat at Baylen — Siege of Sara- gossa. Fourtli coalition — Prodigious elforts of the Austrians ren- dered unavailable by the courage and activity of Na- poleon — Battle of Wagrcim terminates the war — Peace of Vienna — Attempt of the 47* REMARKABLE PERSONAGES. Pius VI, pope, 1799 — Washington^ first president of the United States, 1799 — Patrick Henry, statesman, 1799 — Saussure, naturalist, 1799. Suwarrow, general, 1800 Blair rhetorician, 1800. Feller, biographer, 1802— O'Leanr, controvertist, 1802 — Gerdil, cardi- nal, metaphysician, divine, etc., 1802. Pichegru, general, 1804 — Priestley, chemist, 1804. Nelson, admiral, 1805. William Pitt, the younger, and Charles J. Fox, orators and states- men, 1806 — Walker, 1807 — La- lande, astronomer, 1807. Haydn, musical composer, 1809 ! Lannes, general, 1809. 658 CHEONOLOGICAL TABLE. A. D 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1818 1820 1824' 1820 1823 1827 1829 1830 MEMORABLE EVENTS. French emperor on the Ec- clesiastical State— Pope and cardinals persecuted. America declares war against England — Disastrous cam- paign of Napoleon in Russia, Fifth coalition — Campaign of Saxony — French victorious at Lutzen, Bautzen and Dresden, are entirely de- feated at Leipzic, and lose all their conquests in Ger- many — Driven also from Spain by Wellington; bat- tle of Vittpria — A British flotilla on Lake Erie all captured by the Americans. New defeat of the English on Lake Champlain Victo- rious at Washington, they are foiled in their attempt on Baltimore. Allies enter France — Abdica- tion of Napoleon. Second American war closed by the signal victory of New Orleans. Return of Napoleon from Elba — Sixth coalition against France — Decisive battle of Waterloo, which prostrates the power of the French emperor — His second fall, and exile to St. Helena. Independence of Buenos- Ayres. Independence of Chili, ' Columbia, Bolivia. Peru. . Mexico, Discovery of Electro-Magne- tism. Civil war in Spain — Success- ful exertions of the French in favor of Ferdinand VII. Naval battle of Navarino, which secured the indepen- dence of Greece. Emancipation of tlie British Catholics. Conquest of Algiers by the French— Revolution of July. REMARKABLE PERSONAGES. Koutousoff, general, 1813 — Moreaa, general, 1813— Prince Poniatow- ski, 1813. Berthier, general, 1815 — Ney, gene- ral, 1S15— Murat, king of Naples, 1815 — Robert Fulton, the inventor of steam-boats, 1815, John Carroll, first archbishop of Bal- timore, 1815. Sheridan, orator and poet, 1816. Kosciusko, general, 1817 — Massena, general, 1817 — Blucher, general, 1819 — Count Stolberg, historian, controvertist, 1819 Count de Maistre, statesman, controvertist, 1821 — Napoleon Bonaparte, tlie fallen emperor of the French, 1821 — Castelreagh, statesman, 1822 — Herschell, astronomer, 1822 — Pius VII, pope, 1823, Milner, controvertist, 1826. Fifty years exactly after the declara tion of independence, Thomas Jef- ferson and John Adams, its chief i supporters in Congress, die both on the fourth of July, 1926— Laplace, astronomer, 1827— Davy, chemist, 1829. CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE. 559 A. D. MEMORABLE EVENTS. 1833 New disturbances in Spain after the death of Ferdinand VIL Formation of the Republic of Texas. Intervention of England, Rus- sia, Austria and Prussia, in favor of the Turkish sultan against the encroachments of the pacha of Egypt. C War between China and G. •< Britain terminates to the ( advantage of the English. Fall of the Regent of Spain, Espartero. Petition for the annexation of Texas laid before the Ameri- can Congress. Annexation of Texas. f Mexican War — Victories of the I Americans at Monterey, ■{ Buena Vista, Churubusco, I Ac. — Capture of Vera Cruz [ and Mexico. Peace between Mexico and the United States. Great disturbances in Europe, especially in France, Italy, and Germany. France, a Republic. Signal victories of the Austri- ans in Italy and Hungary. Intervention in the affairs of Rome — The factious con- quered by the French — Re- storation of the Papal gov- ernment. Return of Pope Pius IX to Rome. Coup d'etat odioms Napoleon — End of the French republic. War between the Russians and the Turks — England and France declare against Rus- sia. Battles of Alma, Balaklava and Inkerman. Capture of Sebastopol. The vice-roy of Egypt author- izes the opening- of a canal from Pelusium to Suez. — Oude annexed to British India. Dreadful mutiny of the Sepoy's in India. 1836 1840 1S40 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 REMARKABLE PERSONAGES. Bolivar, general, 1830 — Cuvier, natu- ralist, 1832 — Lafayette, general, 1834 — Humboldt, geographer, 1835 — Marshall, chief justice, historian, 1835 — Bowditch, astronomer, 1838 -^Talleyrand, statesman, 1838 — Moehler, controvertist, 1838. 1850 1851 1854 1855 1856 1857 John England, bishop of Charleston, 1842. Bernadotte, king of Sweden, 1844 — Cardinal Pacca, statesman, histo- rian, 1844 — Thorwalsden, sculptor. Jackson, general, and former presi- dent of the United States, 1845. O'Connell, statesman and orator, 1847. Vico, astronomer, 1848. Berzelius, chemist. Chateaubriand, prose writer and statesman. Calhoun, statesman, 1850. Wordsworth, poet. Taylor, general, and president of the United States. Louis Philip, ex-King of the French. Lingard, historian, 1851 — Duke of Wellington, 1852 — Thomas Moore, poet — Daniel Webster, statesman and orator — Pugin, architect — Arago, astronomer, 1853. Cavaignac, . general, 1857 — Cauchy, mathematician — Radetzky, gene- 660 CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE. A. D. MEMORABLE EVENTS. 1858 Commercial treaty between Ja- pan and the United States. 1859 "War and revolutions in Italy — Battles of Magenta and Solferino — Peace of Villa- franc a. 1860 Savoy and Nice annexed to France — Treaty of peace be- tween Spain and Morocco, and also between France and England, and the Chinese emperor — Battle of Castelfi- dardo. 1861 Bombardment of Fort Sumter Civil war in the U. States — Victor Emmanuel proclaim- ed King of Italy — Expedi- tion of the English, French and Spaniards against Mexi- co — Decree of the Czar eman- cipating the serfs in Eussia — City of Mendoza in the Ar- gentine Confederation en- tirely destroyed by an earth- quake. 1862 Revolution in Greece — King Otho's abdication — Surren- der of New Orleans — Battle of Antietam — Treaty of Sai- gon between France and the emperor of Annam. 1863 Proclamation of the President emancipating the slaves in the United States — Battle of Gettysburg — Surrender of Vicksburg — Insurrection in Poland and destruction of the last remnants of her nationality — Ionian Islands annexed to the Kingdom of Greece — Prince George of 'Denmark inaugurated King of Greece. 1864 "War in Schleswig-Holstein — Emperor Maximilian at Mexico — Capture of Atlanta and Savannah. 1865 Surrender of Gen. Lee — Close of the civil war in the United States — Assassination of Pre- sident Lincoln — Paraguay at war against Brazil, the Ar- gentine Confederation and Uruguay. REMARKABLE PERSONAGES. ral, 1858 — Ravignan, orator, di- vine. Hallam, historian, 1859. Irving, writer — Prescott, historian. Hurter, historian, 1860. Macaulay, essayist, historian. Count Cavour, statesman, 1861. Lacordaire, orator and divine. Nesselrode, statesman, 1862. Knowles, dramatist — SchejSer, poet. Kenrick, archbishop of Baltimore, 1863 — Meyerbeer, composer. Delacroix, painter — Vernet, painter. Taney, chief-justice of the United States, 1864 — Hughes;, archbishop of New York — Silleman, chemist — Pelissier, general — "Wiseman, car- dinal, orator and divine, 1865 — Lord Palmerston, statesman — Leo- pold I, first King of Belgium — La- moriciere, general. CHRONOLOGICAL TABLE. 661 A. D. MEMORABLE EVENTS. 1860 Chili and Peru declare war against Spain — Prussia and Italy at war with Austria — Germany overrun by the Prussians— Battles of Cus- tozza, Sadowa and Lissa— - Annexation of several Ger- man provinces to Prussia and also of Venetia to the Kingdom of Italy — Sub-ma- rine electric-telegraph across the Atlantic — Famine in In- dia. 1867 Confederacy of the British Provinces of America — Rus- sian America purchased by the United States — The em- peror Maxamilian made pri- soner by Juarez and exe- cuted. REMARKABLE PERSONAGES. Scott, general of the U. S. army, 1866 — Delaroche, painter. Cousin, philosopher, 1867. TABLE OF THE AUTHORS AND WORKS, CHIEFLY USED IN THE COMPOSITION OF THIS HISTORY. Alexander (Natalis): Historia Ecclesiastica,S vols, folio, Paris, 1699 ; — the 6lh and 7th vols, have been used. An^uetil: Histoirc de France, 6 vols. 8vo; or 14 vols. 12mo. Precis de Vhistoire uhiverselle; Paris edition, 1818,8 vols. 8vo. A-UGUStine (St.) : De civitate Dei, 7th vol. of the Benedictine edition, folio and 4to. Paris 1679 and 1838. Baldassari: Histoire de V enUvement et de la captivite de Pie VI, translated from the Italian, 1 vol. 8vo. Bancroft: History of the United States, 3 vols. 8vo. 3d edition, Boston, 1838. Beraut-Bercastel : Histoire de VEglise, 12 vols. 8vo. edition of Pelier de Lacroix, Paris, 1830; — Nearly all the volumes have been used, especially the notes of the editor, and Discours sur le second &ge de VEglise, at the end of the 12th vol. Bletterie (La): Histoire de Julien VApostat, 1 vol. 12mo. ,. . . Histoire de VEmpereur Jovien, 1 vol. l2nio. Bossuet: Discours sur Vhistoire universelle, avec la continuation, 2 vols. 12rao. Botjgeanx (F.): Histoire du traite de Westphalia, 6 vols. 12nio. Paris, 1744; a master-piece in almost every respect. Butler (Alban) : Lives of the Fathers, Martyrs, and other principcd Saints, the notes having been particularly useful; London edit. 1756, 4 vols. 8vo. bound in 6 — and French edit., translation of Abbe Godescard, 16 vols. 12mo. Lille, 1824. Caveyrac : Apologir de Louis XIV et de son Conseil sur la revocation de Vedit de JVantes, and Dissertation sur la jow-nee de la St. BartJU- lemi; 1 vol. 8vo. Clemencet: Art de verifier ks dates, folio, Paris, 1770. Coyer: Histoire de Jean Sobieski, roi de Pologne, 3 vols. 12nio. Warsaw, 1761. TABLE OP^ AUTHORS. 563 CaETlER: Histoire des Empereurs Romains, 12 vols. 12mo. Paris, 1763. Daniel (F): Histoire de France, 3 vols, folio, Paris, 1713. Abrege de Vhistoire de France, 12 vols. 12mo. Paris, 1751. Desormeaux : Abrege chronologique de Vhistoire d^Espagne, 5 vols. 12mo. Paris, 1759. This author, generally exact in the historical part, is frequently wrong and unjust in his remarks. EsPAGNAc: Histoire de Mawice, Comte de Saxe, 2 vols. i2mo. Tou- louse, 1789. EusEBius : Ecclesiast. History, translated by C. F. Cruse, 1 vol. 8vo. Philadelphia, 1834; and also, together with the Life of Constantine the Great, edit, of Henri de Valois (Greek and Latin), 1 vol. folio, Paris, 1659. Feller: Dictionnaire historique, ou Histoire abrigee des Iwmmes ctU- bres. The text of Feller being sometimes altered in the latest editions, those who desire to have it pure and untouched, should have recourse to the more ancient ones; v. g. to that of Lyons, 1821, 12 vols. 8vo. Flechier: Histoire de VEmpereur TJieodose-le-grand, 1 vol. 12mo. Fleury; Histoire Ecclesiastique, 25 vols. 8vo. Nismes, 1779. Frantin : Annates du Moyen &ge, 8 vols. 8vo. Paris, 1825. Frost: Histoi-y of the United States, 1 vol. 12mo. Philadelphia, 1841. Q *## (M.) : Pouvoir du Pape au moyen dge, 1 vol. 8vo. Paris, 1839. Gahan: Histm-y of the Church, 1 vol. 12mo.; short, and having some little inaccuracies, yet generally full of sound information. Gregory of Tours (St.): Historice Francm-um Libri decern, 1 vol. small 8vo. Paris, 1561. GuYARD DE Berville: Histoirc de Bertrand Dugueselin, 2 vols. 12rao. Histoire de la Revolution Fran^aise, 1 vol, 12mo. Paris, 1838. Histoire de VEglise Gallicane, remarkable for soundness of criticism and purity of style; 18 vols. 8vo. Nismes, 1780-81. Histoire de Venise, 1 vol. 12mo. Tours, 1839. Histoire du Bos-Empire (a. m. ss. c. g.): 2 vols. 8vo. Paris, 1838. Histoire Universelle (translated from the English), 125 vols. 8vo. Paris, 1779. The volumes containing the history of the Arabs, the Tartars, the Ottomans, America, Spain, England, France and Germany, have been particularly useful. History of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, 2 vols 12mo. Cork, 1815. Hurter: Histoire du Pape Innocent III, translated from the German by Alexandre de St. Cheron, 3 vols. Svo. Paris, 1S38. • Irving (Washington): History of the Life and Voyages of Christen pher GGliimhus^ 2 yok Svo. New York, 1831. 564 TABLE OF AUTKOKS. Irving (Washington) : Conquest of Chranada, 2 vols. 12mo. Phila delphia, 1839. JosEPHUs, the Jewish historian : last book of his Antiquities, and the seven books of his Jewish War ; English translation of Whitsoiij or French of Arnaud d^Andilly. Kent (Chancellor): vol. 1. of his Commentaries on Law, 2d edi- tion, 4 vols. 8vo. New York, 1832. Labbe : Sacrosancta Concilia, vols, x and xi. Lackoix: Geographie, 2 vols. 12mo.; too old as a geographical work. yet full of information. Lactantius: De morte Persecutm'um; to be found in the end of the 16th and last vol. of the Lives of the Saints, Lille, 1824. Ladvocat; Dictionnaire historique, 2 vols. 8vo. Paris, 1755. La Harpe : Abrege de Vhistoire des voyages, continued by Baron de iloujoux; 30 vols. 8vo. Paris, 1830. Lebeau: Histoire du B&s-Empire, 29 vols. 12mo. Paris, 1757. This work, and that of Frantin, mentioned above, although generally excellent and very well written, are not to be implicitly relied on in the remarks and judgments which they contain about different transactions and personages ; their authors having too easily fol- lowed the prejudices of their time concerning certain historical points of great importance. Lebrun: Aventures et conquetes de Femand Cortez, 1 vol. 12mo. Tours, 1839. ... Conquete du Pirou et Histoire de Pizarre, 1 vol. 12mo. Tours, 1840. Lsfranc: Histoire du Moyen Age, 1 vol. 12mo. Histoire Moderne, 2 vols. 12mo. Lyons, 1840. Histoire de France, 2 vols. 12mo. Lyons, 1838. Lenglet du Fresnoy : Tahlettes chronologiques de Vhistoire umver- selle, 2 vols. 12mo. Paris, 1744. Lingard: Antiquities of the Anglo-Saxon Church; either the London edition, 1810, or the first American edition, Philadelphia. History of England, 14 vols. 8vo. London, 1825. LoRiciuET (F.): Histoire de France, 2 vols. 12mo. Maistre (Count de): Du Pape, 2 vols. 8vo. Lyons, 1819. Lettres sur VInquisition Espagnole, 1 vol. 8vo. Paris, 1822. Marles: Histoire de Marie Stuart, Reine d'Ecosse, 1 vol. 12mo, Tours, 1840. Marshall: Colonial History, 1 vol. 8vo. Philadelphia, 1824. Life of Washington, 2 vols. 8vo. Philadelphia, 1832. Marsollier: Histoire du ministhe du Cardinal Ximen^, 2 void. 12mo. Paris, 1704. TABLE OF AUTHOES. 565 MiCHAUx: Histoire des Croisades, 4th edition, 6 vols. 8vo. Paris, 1825 MiGNOT : Histoire de Vempire Ottoman, 1 vol. 4to, or 4 vols. 12mo 1771. Mame. edit. Histoire de. Vempereur Charles- Quint 1 vol. lours, 12mo. 1/38. Moore: History of Ireland, 1 vol. 8vo. Myijus: History of England, 1 vol. 12mo. Nonnotte: Eireurs de Voltaire, 2 vols. 12mo. Besan9on, 1818. Orleans (F. D') : Histoire des Revolutions d^Angleterre, 4 vols. 12mo. Amsterdam, 1766. Histoire des Revolutions d^Espagne, from the best Spanish historians, Mariana and others ; 3 vols. 4to. Paris, 1734. Pacca: Mimoiresdu Cardinal Pacca sur la captivite du Rape Pie VU, translated from the Italian, 2 vols. Svo. Paris, 1833. Perefixe : Histoire de Henri le Grand, roi de France et de JSmarre, 1 vol. 12mo. Petavius : Rationarium Temponim, 2 vols. 12mo. Paris, 1703. Proyart: Vie du Dauphin (Duke of Burgundy), p^re de Loui* XV, 2 vols. 12mo. Histoire de Stanislas, roi de Pologne, due de Lorraine et de Bar, 1 vol. 12mo. Raguenet: Histoire du Vicomte de Turenne, 1 vol. 12mo. Robertson: History of ..America, 2 vols. 4to. London, 1777. of the reign of the emperor Charles V, 3 vols. 8vo. 2d American edition, Philadelphia, 1812. Roscoe: The life and pontificate of Leo X, 4 vols. Svo. Philadelphia, 1805. Roy : Histoire de Charlemagne, 1 vol. 12mo. Tours, 1838. , de Jeanne d'Arc, 1 vol. 12mo. Tours, 1840. Sadler: Lingard^s History of England continued, 1 vol. 12mo. Pans, 1836. SiDONius Apollinaris : Epistolce et Carmina, edit. Sirmondi, Paris, 1614. Socrates and Sozomenes, Greek historians, edit, of Henri de Valois, 1 vol. folio, Paris, 1668. SoLis : Conquista de la A''ueva Esfonha. I vol. 4to. Suetonius: Duodecim CcBsares, 2 vols. 8vo., which are the 98th and 99th of the Collection of Classics, or Bibliotheca Latina Clasaica, Paris, 1828. SuLPiTius Severus : Historice Sacrce libri duo, 1 vol. 18mo. edit, of Mercier, Paris, 1659. Tacitus, the gravest, the most concise and energetic of historians, 1 vol. 12mo, in the edition of Lallemant. — 4 vols.Svo, in the Col* lection of Classics, from vol. 100 to 104. 48 566 TABLE OF AUTHORS. Tertttllian : Apologeticm adversics gentes et de Prcescriptionibia ad versus hcer. ; 1 vol. 8vo. Paris, 1828. Theodoret, Greek historian, edit, of Henri de Valois, Paris, 1673. Thomassin: Discipline de VEglise, 3 folios, Paris, 1725 j particulaily the first book of vol. ii, ch. xcii — cii. TiLLEMONT (Le Nain de) : Histoire des Empereurs, 6 vols. 4to. Paris, 1690; so learned, and so exact in his continual quotations of ancient authors, that, for the historical parts of which he treats, he can supply the deficiency of all other historians. Velleius Paterculus: Historian libri duo; 1 vol. 12mo. edit of Abbe Paul, or the 125th vol. 8vo. in the Collection of Classics. Vertot: Histoire des Revolutions de Portugal, 1 vol. 12mo. des Chevaliers deMalte,abregee en 1 vol. 12mo. Tours, 1837. Voigt: Histoire du Pape Gregoire VII, translated from the German by Abbe Jager, 2 vols. 8vo. Paris, 1838. Voltaire : Histoire de Charles XII, 1 vol. 12mo. Walter Scott: The life ofJVapoleon Bonaparte, 2 vols. 8vo. Exete*, 1839. Wilson: Histoi'y of the American Revolution, 1 vol. 12mo. Balti- more, 1834. Many other works have been occasionally resorted to and consulted, which we purposely omit mentioning, because their enumeration would be of little or no utility to the reader. It is almost superfluous to observe, that several of the authors here mentioned, v. g. Roscoe, Walter Scott, Robertson, etc., have been resorted to as historians, but not as politicians or philosophers ; and have been followed when they relate well-substantiated facts, but not when they bring forward their own private views and religious prejudices. THE END. QUESTIONS TO FREDBT'S MODERN HISTORT. N. B,-The order and mimber of the Questions are made to answer exactly the oiJer and number of the paragraphs belonging to each successive page of the volume. Part I.— From the Battle of Actium to the Accession of Constantine. THE ROMAN EMPIRE. — AUGUSTUS. PACK lo \yhat Avere the thoiifrhts of Aujrustus after the battle of Actium? Vv horn did he consult about his future conduct? What was the opinion of Agrippa? 14 What was the opinion of M'^cenas? Whose advice did Augustus follow, and under what restrictions? W hat were the happy fruits of his government? What blessings did he confer on the various parts of the empire? 15 W hat was one of the principal objects of his attention? Who were some of the distinguished literary men in his reign? When and where did Virgil die? What did he command just before his death ? What did Augustus do ? 16 What was the character of the public administration of Augustus? How did he behave towards private persons? What specimens did he give of his moderation? 17 ^^hat care did he take of his reputation? What is to be thought of the change in his character and conduct? what influence had this change on the duration of his power? In what manner did he receive the title o^ Father of his Country? 18 lo what danger was he exposed from secret conspirators? What were his feelings, when he had detected the conspiracy of Cinna? How did he act towards Cinna ? What was the result of his clemency ? 19 What was the greatest event that took place during the rei^rn of Augustus? & s What uncommon circumstance coincided with the birth of our Saviour ? With what dislike did Augustus consider warfare? Was he not however engaged in several wars, and with what success did he conduct them? What disaster happened to the Eoman troops in Germany.? 20 What impression was produced on Augustus's mind by ihe defeat Varus ? What other subjects of grief did the emperor find in his own family What were the chief qualifications of Agrippa? 21 What intimacy existed between Augustus and Agrippa? Whnt must be said to the praise of Mrecenas? . What must be said to the praise of Drusus? What must be said to the praise of young Marcellus? In whom did the emperor now centre his expectation? How did he continue in the cares of government ? What was the manner of his death ? 22 What opinion is to be had of the public character of Augustus? What was, at this period, the number of the Roman citizens, and tho population of Rome? 2 QUESTIONS TIBERIUS. 23 Who suceee led Augustus in the imperial dignitj- ? AYhat incliuations did Tiberius begin to manifest? How did he take the jest of a certain wag ? Was his reign altogether inglorious ? What had happened, by this time, to the legions of Pannonia and Germany? How was the sedition of the former quelled? 24 By what exertions did Germanicus stay the revolt of his troops ? How did they endeavor to atone for their fault? How were the Germans repeatedly defeated ? 25 What were the feelings of Tiberius at the news of these events? What plan of operations was contrived by Germanicus for the ensuing summer? How were the remains of the soldiers of Varus found? What grief did the Roman soldiers experience at this sight? 26 What did the Romans do after they buried the remains of their coun- trymen? Describe the battle that followed? What is said of Germanicus ? How did he behave towards his soldiers, and towards the hostile Ger- mans? How did he proceed into the enemy's country? 2*7 Describe the battle fought between him and Arminius ? What is said of the victory ? Were the Germans dispirited by their defeat? What happened to the Roman troops on their return ? 28 How did Germanicus repair the disaster of his fleet? How did he counteract the designs of the Germans? Why and how was he recalled to Rome? What were the subsequent events in Germany ? 29 What became of Ai*minius? What was the chief desire and aim of Tiberius? What instances did he afford of his liberality ? 30 What was the real bent of his character? What commission was given to Germanicus, and how did he execute it? How did Germanicus close his career ? 31 What was the grief occasioned by his death ? How did Tiberius act towards Germanicus's enemies, and how did he treat the persons of his own family ? Who was Sejauus ; how did he rise in favor, and what was the cause of his subsequent downfall ? What events were then accomplished in Judea? 32 How was the Christian Church founded ? How did Tiberius, exercise his tyra-nny ? Where did he retire, and to what excesses did he abandon himself 7 When and how was his life ended ? 33 What gradation with regard to vice is to be remarked in that emperor? What celebrated authors flourished under Tiberius ? CALIGULA. Who was Caligula, and in what manner did he begin his reign ? What change took place in the conduct of Caligula? 34 How did he indulge his prodigality and rapacity? What cruelties and barbarities did he exercise against men?' How partial and kind was he to beasts, especially to his horse? How did he conduct the war against the Germans ? ON MODERN HISTORY. 3 PACK 35 What ridiculous exploits did he perform? llow ijii (lid he carry his pride and impiety? What was the end of his life? What happened in Rome after the assassination of Caligula, and who was proclaimed empercr in his place. CLAUDIUS. 36 What was the character of Claudius? What was the most important event of his reign? What conquests were achieved by Plautius and Vespasian in Great Britain? Who were left to continue the war in Britain? o7 How were the Silures subdued by the Romans ? How did Caractacus behave himself, and how was he treated in Rome? What Avere the other events of Claudius' reign? By whom and why was he poisoned? NERO. 38 Who was Nero, and how did he begin to govern the empfre? What was his real character ? How did he dispose of his young brother Britannicus? How did he put his mother to death ? How did he treat his tutors and wives? 39 Who was sent against the Parthians ? What manner of warfare was adopted by Borbulo ? What was the final result of the Parthian war ? 40 What insurrection arose in Great Britain against the Romane? How did Suetonius Paulinus prepare to check the insurgents ? How did he tight them, and with what success ? 41 How did Nero degi-ade the majesty of the empire? What were his daily expenses? How far did he carry the luxury of his table, dress, etc. B,y what means didie supply himself with money? 42 What was the course of his cruelties ? What does Tacitus say of him? Who was commonly believed to have set Rome on fire? What gave occasion to the first general persecution against the Church, and how were the Christians tormented ? 43 Who raised first the standard of insurrection against Nero? How did Nero terminate his life? 44 What rank does he occupy among wicked princes ? GALBA, OTHO, VITELLIUS. What was the character and the duration of the reign of Galba? Who was Otho, and how long did he reign ? In what did the chief merit of Vitellius consist ? 4f By whom was Vespasian elected emperor, and who contributed most to his success? How did Antonius Primus open the campaign against the A^'itellians ? 46 How did he prepare for a general engagement? What singular circumstances accompanied the battle ? How were the exertions of Primusi rendered successful ? How were the Vitellians again defeated ? 4*1 Describe an attack on the camp? What is said of these victories? of the city of Cremona? 48* 4 QUESTIONS PAGE 47 How was Rome taken and entered by the victorious army? What became of Vitellius? How was he put to death? How many Emperors reigned in the year A.D. 69? VESPASIAN. 48 What memorable event took place in the year 70? When did the Jews revolt against the Roman-? AVhat were the first events of the Jewish war .'' What was the situation, both physical and moral, of Jerusalem? 49 How long did the siege of Jerusalem last, and how was it conducted? To what excess of famine were the besieged reduced ? To what crimes did this plague give rise, and what was the number of its victims? 50 By what feelings were the Romans actuated towards the Jews ? How was fire set to the temple of Jerusalem? Describe its destruction. 61 What coincidence rendered the burning of the temple more remarkable? How was the reduction of Jerusalem completed, and how many Jews had perished during the siege ? What predictions were fulfilled by the destruction of Jerusalem ? What prodigies had. foretold its ruin ? What had taken place in the year which preceded the beginning of hostilities ? 62 What voice was heard issuing from the sanctuary of the temple on the day of Pentecost? What does Josephus relate of a certain countryman who lived at that time? Where did Titus go after the destruction of Jerusalem? 53 What was done by Vespasian to restore the splendor of the empire ? How did he check luxury and effeminacy? How did he promote justice, and practise beneficence and kindness? On what occasion did his usual clemency disappear? Of what other fault is he accused, and with what justice and truth ? 54 In what manner did he close his life? What is to be remarked of the census taken under Vespasian ? TITUS. Who succeeded Vespasian ? 55 What was the benevolence of Titus ? How did he endeavor to repair public disasters? what was the most dreadful of these calamitous events? How did Pliny the elder perish ? To what dangers was Pliny the younger exposed ? 56 What were the sad effects of the eruption Of Mount Vesuvius ? How did Titus behave in the midst of these calamities? How long did he reign ? D M I T I A N . What contrast did there exist between Titus and Domitian? 57 Who had first to suffer from the suspicious policy of Domitian? What was the success of Domitian's wars? What was the tyranny of Domitian, and how did he excite the second general persecution against the Christians ? 58 What honors did he require ? Relate an instance of nis love of cruelty? What fears did he entertain, and by whom was he murdered ? With whom can Domitian be justly compared? ON MODERN HISTORY. 5 59 Who was chosen emperor after Domitian ? Who succeeded Nerva ? NERVA AND TRAJAN. What did he possess? How did he receive the news of his election? How did be seem to reign? How did he embellish the capital? How did he live with his people? 60 In what rank ought he to be placed as a general? What conquests did he achieve? What reputation did Trajan leave behind him? How did he act towards the Christians? What was his private life? Who were the chief authors that flourished under his reign, or there- abouts? 61 What intimacy existed between Tacitus and Pliny the younger? Who, in their time, gained the premium of poetry ? ADRIAN. Did Adrian follow the footsteps of his predecessor in every thing? What means did he employ to preserve a constant peace? How did he revive the strictness of military discipline? 62 What kindness did he show to the soldiers? What attention did he pay to civil affairs? • What was his conduct towards the senate and the people? What particular instances are recorded of his clemency and regard for truth? 63 Were the talents of Adrian quite remarkable? What is related of his memory ? To what undertakings did his genius prompt him? What revolt disturbed the tranquility of Adrian's reign? How did the Roman generals tight and prostrate the revolted Jews? 64 AVhat has been, ever since that time, the situation of the Jews ? How did Adrian spend the last part of his life ? 65 What opinion must be entertained of his public character? What was the state of literature under Adrian? ANTONINUS. Who was Antoninus Pius? How did Antoninus conduct himself on the occasion of a conspiracy? 66 What kindness did he show to a Grecian philosopher ? What other instances may be adduced of his meekness and generosity? How did he govern the state ? 67 How was Antoninus disposed towards the Christians? What influence did his moderation secure him over foreign nations? How long did he live, and what was the public feeling in his regard? MARCUS-AURELIUS. 6S How far did Marcus-Aurelius imitate the example of his predecessor Y Who checked the progress of the Parthians, and by what plague was the victory of the Romans followed? What occurred most remarkable in the expedition of Marcus-Aurelius against the Marcomans ? What were the circumstances that acquired for the 12th legion the name of thundering ? 69 What credit does Marcus-Aurelius deserve as an author ? 6 QUESTIONS COMMODUS, PERTINAX, DIDIUS JULIANUS VAOE How did Commodus imitate the worst of tyrants? •What advantages did the short reign of Pertinax procure to the state? How was the empire put up at auction ? To How did Severus succeed in quickly overthrowing Didius Julianus? SE PTIMUS SEVERUS. Who were the other competitors of Severus ? By what series of defeats was the power of Niger destroyed ? What penalties were inflicted on the vanquished party ? Tl What were the opposite views of Severus and Albinus? How did they come to an open rupture? Where did Albinus intend to go, and how did Severus march against him? Where and how was a decisive battle fought between them? 72 B}' what exertions did Severus revive the courage of his troops? AVho decided the fate of the day? What use did Severus make of his prosperity? 73 How did he reward his soldiers, and punish his enemies ? What lesson did he then receive from his younger son Geta? Who was Plautian, and what was his fate ? What was the situation of the Christians, and how were they treated by Severus ? 74 How did they bear the persecution and endure torments ? What else concurred in the vindication of Christianity ? Who wrote in its favor ? 75 Is Severus to be reckoned among the most wicked princes ? What w^as his distinguishing feature ? Against whom did he perform his last military expedition ? ^ 76 What sad event did then happen to him ? How did he reproach Caracalla with his detestable design? Where was Severus taken ill, and how did he settle the succession of the empire? What were his last words and actions ? 77 What comparison may be established between him and Napoleon Bonaparte ? CARACALLA, MACRINUS, HELIOGABALUS. How did Caracalla begin and prosecute his reign ? By whom was he murdered and succeeded on the throne ? What new revolution overthrew Macrinus ? 78 How were all the worst tyrants revived iu Heliogabalus ? How did he perish, and who succeeded him ? ALEXANDER SEVERUS. What were the inclinations and favorite virtues of Alexander Severus ? 79 How old was Alexander ? For this to whom was he indebted? How did he reform the various orders of the state? What criminals did he punish with the greatest severity ? How did he treat those who abused their favor near him, and betraj^ed his confidence? With what attention did he proceed to the choice of governors and magistrates ? 80 What clemeucy did he use towards Ovinius Camillus? What was his conduct towards the soldiers? What influence did he acquire over them? ON MODERN HISTORY. *J PA8U 81 With wliat care did he manage the public treasury, and provide for the poor and the distressed ? What wag the love and veneration of the Romans for Alexander? What happened in Persia, which obliged Alexander to leave Rome for a time ? 8? How did his troops conduct themselves? What were the sad results of Alexander's attempt to re-establish order among the legions of Gaul and Germany? What judgment is to be passed on Alexander Severus, and by what calamities was his death followed ? MILITARY USURPERS. 83 Who was Maxirain? What had the Romans, and particularly the Christians, to suffer from Maximin ? What was the end of Maximin 's life? Of whom was young Gordian a living copy ? How did Philip acquire, govern, and lose the empire? What is said of Decius? What persecution was excited by him? 84 How Jong did Gallus and ^milian reign, and how did they perish? What were the qualifications of Valerian? How was he taken pri- soner, and how treated by the Persians? What had induced him to declare war against the Christians, and who were the chief victims of this new persecution? How was the whole empire also visited by various chastisements from the divine justice? 85 What saved the state from utter ruin? CLAUDIUS II. What virtues did Claudius II display after his accession to the throne ? 86 Describe his exploits against the Goths? What became of the Gothic fleet and army? Where and of what disease did Claudius die? A U R E L I AN. 87 What were the first exploits of Aurelian ? What new monarchy had been lately founded in the East? By what means did Zenobia render herself conspicuous and powerful ? With what celerity and success did Aurelian march against her? What did Zenobia do ? Describe the battle under the walls of Emesa? 88 What was the antiquity and the situation of Palmyra? How did Zenobia sustain the siege of her capital? How did she behave herself on being taken prisoner ? 89 What caused the ruin of Palmyra and of its inhabitants? What became of Zenobia ? What other provinces did Aurelian recover? How did he govern the empire ? What was the occasion of his death? What had been his conduct towards the Christians? TACITUS AND PROBUS. 90 What dispute of mutual deference took place between the army and the senate? ■ Whom did the senate appoint emperor? How was Probus peculiarly fitted for the time in which he lived and reigned? What losses did he inflict on the Germans? 8 QUESTIONS PAGE 91 How did he also check the pride of the Persians ? What crime deprived the state of so great a prince? What rank does Probus hold among the Roman emperors ? 92 Who was the successor of Probus ? What happened to Carinus and Numerian ? DIOCLETIAN AND MAXIMIAN. How did Diocletian ascend the throne, and whom did he choose for his colleague? What further measures were taken to assist the two emperors? Who was Constantius-Chlorus ? 93 How fully could this prince relj upon the affection of his subjects ? Who was Galerius ? How did Galerius defeat the Persians? 94 By what means did he excite the tenth general persecution against the Church? What was the rigor of this persecution, and how great the number of its victims? Did the persecutors obtain the object of their desire ? 95 What misfortunes fell upon Diocletian ? Where and how did he spend the last years of his life ? What was the fate of Maximian ? Upon whom was the justice of God more strikingly displayed ? 96 Was not Constantius-Chlorus saved from the like disasters ? How had he favored the Christians ? What was the only subject of uneasiness he had ? What consolation did he enjoy at his last moments ? Part II . — Accession of Constantine — Downfall of the Roman Empire. CONSTANTINE THE GREAT. 98 What brilliant qualities appeared in Constantine from the beginning of his reign? How was the Roman empire then divided? What were the victories of Constantine over the Franks ? Against whom did he prepare next to wage war ? 99 With what vision was he favored ? How did he penetrate and advance into Italy ? Whom was he obliged to fight near Verona, and how did he behave in the battle ? What was the result of the battle? 100 How signal and important was his victory? How did he conquer his rival Maxentius in a still more important engagement? What honors were paid to Constantine at and after his entry into Rome? What inscription was on his statue ? 101 How did he use his power, and when did he begin to make an open profession of Christianity? How was Asia rescued from her tyrant Maximin II? What gave rise to hostilities between Constantine and Licinius? Where did the two emperors meet? What was the result of the battle? Where was another battle fought, and with what result? 102 Was peace of long duration, and when did a new contesi arise between them? What was the number of the forces on either side ? Where did the aimies meet? Describe the stratagem and the battle that followed? ON MODERN HISTORY. 9 PACK J 03 Who was victorious at sea? What new defeat did Licinius experience near Chalcedon, and how was he treated by his conqueror? What was the clemency shown to the partisans of Licinius, and what laws were enacted by Constantine? 104 What care did he take to maintain good order among the troops? How did he love letters and provide for the good education of his children? What was his zeal for religion, and what celebrated council Avas held under his reign ? 105 What are the faults with which Constantine is reproached, particu- larly with regard to his son Crispus ? Why and when did he build Constantinople? What is said of his faults? Of his piety, benevolence, alms to the poor, &c.? 106 What reputation did he acquire, even among foreign nations? What were his last military exploits ? When did he die, and what grief was every where displayed at the news of his death ? CONSTANTIDS, CONSTANTINE II, AND CONSTANS. 107 How was the empire divided between the three sons of Constantine? What dispute soon broke out between two of them? What was the character and the chief occupation of their brother Constantius ? 108 How did he destroy the usurper Magnentius? Whom did Constantius appoint his colleague, and what violence did he exercise to promote the cause of Arianism ? 109 How did the Caesar Julian discharge his duty in Gaul? What revolution placed Julian on the throne? JULIAN. What method did Julian adopt in regulating the state, and in perse- cuting the Christian religion ? 110 What were the views of Julian in attempting to rebuild the temple of Jerusalem ? With what readiness did the Jews set to the projected work ? By what prodigies were their endeavors defeated? 111 What circumstances concurred to render this event most incontestible? What is observed of this event? Against what enemy did Julian now prepare to fight ? How did he advance Avith his army through Mesopotamia and Assyria? 112 How did his fleet pass from the river Euphrates to the Tigris, and how Avas the Tigris itself crossed? Upon what considerations, and what advice, did he alter his plans? What dangers and attacks had the Romans to encounter in their march? How did Julian himself receive a deadly wound? How did he die according to some? 113 What can be said of Julian's character ? What peculiar talent and quality did he certainly possess? JOVIAN. Who was appointed his successor, and what was the sad result of Julian's expedition? What were the transactions of Jovian's reign? 114 Who was next elected emneror ? 10 QUESTIONS VALENTINIAN AND VALENS. PAGE Whom did Valentinian declare his colleague? How did Valentinian govern his portion of the empire? 115 How did his irascible temper become fatal to himself? What were the good and the bad qualities of Valens? What military achievements were performed by his generals? 116 How was Valens signally defeated by the Goths? What was the situation of the empire after the battle of Adrian ople, until the accession of Theodosiiis? THEODOSIDS I, GRATIAN, AND VALENTINIAN II. 117 Who was Theodosius? What change took place in the state of affairs? What laws were enacted by Theodosius ? What zeal did he show for religion? 118 What was the conduct and the sad fate of the emperor Gratian? What were the further views of the usurper Maximus, and how were they defeated? What sedition took place in Antioch? 119 How did Theodosius first punish, and then forgive its authors? What excess of severity did he exercise against the inhabitants of Thessalonica? By whom was he induced to repent of his fault? What is said of the 3'oung emperor? 120 What happened to the emperor Valentinian II? What was the affliction of Theodosius for the death of that prince? What battle was fought near Aquileia? 121 How did heaven declare for Theodosius? How long did he live after his victory, and what honors were paid to his memory ? 122 What wei-e the public achievements of Theodosius? What were his private qualities and Christian virtues ? 123 Who succeeded Theodosius on the throne? HONORIUS AND ARCADIUS. What can be found worthy of remark in the reign of Arcadius ? To whom are attributed chiefly the disasters of Honorius' reign ? What were the views of Stilico, and what punishment was inflicted both on him and his partisans ? 124 What provinces of the empire were invaded by the barbarians? How was Rome itself besieged and taken by Alaric ? What were the chief effects of the fall of Rome? What was the further progress of Alaric? How was his careej closed? 125 Where did the Goths obtain a solid settlement? When and why did the Romans withdraw from Great Britain ? When did the French monarchy begin ? What happy change took place in the public affairs during the last years of Honorius, and to whom was it owing ? VALENTINIAN III, THEODOSIUS II 126 Upon whom was the crown transferred after the death of Honorius? Who was reigning in the East? Why did the prosperity of the Eastern empire decline ? 12*7 What caused still more cala'nitous events in the West? What wicked plan was contrived by iEtius to ruin Count Boniface? What was the sad conseauence of his artifice ? ON MODERN HISTORY. H rAGB 128 What was the final result of the contest between Boniface and ^tius? By what services did yEtius make up for his fault? What new invasion threatened the empire? How was Attila repulsed from Orleans? 129 What overthrow did he experience in the plains of Chalons ? What were the consequences of the battle? By what means did Attila succeed in taking Aquileia? 130 What ravages did he commit in the north of Italy? Who prevailed upon him to retire? When did he die, and what became of the vast empire which he had founded? * What was the manner of death both of JEtius and of the emperor Valentinianlll? MARCIAN, LEO THE THRACIAN. 131 Who called the Vandals from Africa, and how was Rome plundered by them? Who reigned in the East after Theodosius II? What did Marcian do as soon as he Avas acknowledged emperor? How did he reply to the deputies of Attila? 132 How^ did he assist the pastors of the Church in maintaining the true faith ? What were the private qualities of Marcian, and what was the dura- tion of his reign? Who was his successor? What famous conqueror lived at the same time ? 133 What was now the condition of the Western empire ? How many emperors reigned within a few years? What was done by the patrician Ricimer ? Who was the last emperor of the West? Who took the title of King of Italy ? 134 What circumstances accompanied the fall of the Western empire? How did religion, amidst these revolutions, maintain her influence and dignity ? Part III. — Foundation of the Principal States of Europe. ANGLO-SAXONS IN BRITAIN. — HENGIST. 135 When were the principal states now extant in Europe, founded? What had been for a long time the situation of Great Britain? Whom did the Britons call to their assistance, and how did a war arise between them and their auxiliaries? 136 What victories were gained and what settlements made by the Anglo- Saxons? When were the Anglo-Saxons converted to Christianity ? What became of the ancient inhabitants ? VISIGOTHS IN SPAIN — EVARIC. How and when was Spain conquered by the Visigoths ? I3t What Avere the other conquests of Evaric? What laws did he give to his people ? When did Evaric die? What acts of cruelty did he commit ? THE FRANKS IN GAUL CLOVIS. 138 Who were the Franks? Which of their kings was the real founder of the French monarchy ? 49 12 QUESTIONS PhOS Whom did Clovis attack first? What was the occasion of the conversion of Clovis to Christianity? Wliat were his other wars and conquests ? liJ9 What reputation was acquired and left by Clovis ? What skill did he evince as a politician and a legislator ? OSTROGOTHS IN ITALY — THE DORIC THE GREAT. 140 Who was the ablest watrior and statesman of that age ? How did Theodoric achieve the conquest of Italy? By what means did he secure his power? How did he govern both his ancient and new subjects? 141 Who were his chief counsellors? What was his zeal for learning and for useful institutions? What was the extent of his empire? W^hat faults did he commit at the beginning and towards the end of his reign ? 142 How did he die, and who was his successor? What must be thought of the administration of Theodoric? EMPERORS OF CONSTANTINOPLE — JUSTIN. What were the talents and qualities of Justin T, emperor of Constan- tinople ? 143 What disasters happened about this time? By what plagues was Antioch visited? What was the desolation of that city ? 144 Did all the inhabitants perish ? How long lasted the earthquake? AVhat were the feelings and the solicitude of Justin on the occasion of these events ? JUSTINIAN. What contributed chiefly to render the reign of Justinian glorious? What were the views of Justinian with regard to the civil legislation? 145 What are the diflFerent parts of the Justinian compilation of laws? What has been the renown of the Roman law? 146 What was the situation of the Vandals in Africa? What victories were gained over them by Belisarius ? How was king Gelimer pursued and besieged ? 147 How did he surrender himself into the hands of Belisarius ? Where did Belisarius return to? What became of Gelimer? How was Italy also subdued by Belisarius ? 148 How did the Goths retrieve their losses for a time? W^hat exploits were achieved by Totila ? Who was Narses? What victory was gained "by Narses over Totila? 149 Whom did the Goths put at their head after the death of Totila ? What new battle was fought between the Romans and the Goths ? How was Teias slain during the conflict? With what fury was the battle renewed ? What was the result of i*ne battle? 150 What share did the French take in these broils ? What were the designs of King Theodebertus against Justinian ? Who undertook the defence of the Goths ? What became of Leutharia and of his troops? 151 Where did the armies of Narses and Bucelin meet? What was the result of the battle ? What was the number slain on each side ? What disastrous war was, at the same time, carried on between tne Romans and the Persians ? ON MODERN HISTORY, 13 TAGE 152 What fresh calamities visited the empire? Who defeated the Huns? What misfortunes happened to Iklisarius? When did l)oth Justinian and Belisarius die? What reverses attended the close of Justinian's reign? With what other faults is Justinian justly reproached? 153 What praises does he deserve? JUSTIN II, TIBERIUS II. Who succeeded Justinian? What measure was taken b}'- Justin II to check fraud and extortion? 154 What firmness was displayed by the prefect of Constantinople? What were the defects of Justin and of the empress Sophia? 155 What reventre is said to have been taken by Narses? With what success did the Lombards invade Italy? What gave rise to a fresh war with the Persians? How was it con- ducted on both sides? 156 In what battle was King Chosroes defeated? What were the exertions of Tiberius, the emperor's colleague, for the good of the state? When was Tiberius left sole master, and how did he defeat the intrigues of the empress Sophia? 15Y How long and how successfully did he reign? MAURITIUS. Who was Mauritius? In what manner did the war continue against the Persians? What disturbances took place in Persia? How did Mauritius concur in putting an end to \hem? 158 What was the happ}' effect of his conduct? Who were the Avari ? How did Priscus, the Roman general, begin his expedition against the Avari ? What were the new victories of Priscus? 159 How were the Gepidee also entirely defeated? What v/as the close of Priscus' glorious campaign ? What event brought an odium upon Mauritius ? By what catastrophe was his reign terminated ? IGO By what disasters and calamities was Italy visited? Who was raised to the chair of St. Peter, and how did he govern the Church? PH C A S . 161 Who w^as Phocas? Who w^aged war against him? By whom w^as Phocas dethroned? HERACLIUS. 162 In what condition was the empire found at the accession of Heraclius? How did the Persians pursue the war? How did Heraclius prepare to march against them ? 103 What were the exploits of Heraclius in Armenia and Persia? What was the success of his subsequent campaigns? Which was his most signal victory? What became of the Persian king? 164 What had been the character and government of Chosroes II? Upon what terras was peace concluded between the Persians and the Romans? What was now the situation.of the two empires? 14 QUESTIONS M A H M E T A N I S M . FASE Who was Mahomet ? When and where was be born ? What quahty did he assume? 165 What religious system was broached by Mahomet, and what ought to be said of the Koran ? What circumstances were favorable to Mahomet's design, and what obstacles did he meet in his way? To what means did he resort to propagate his religion? 166 What impulse did he give to his followers ? What was another means of his success? What were the three condi- tions offered when declaring war? By what names are the followers of Mahomet designated? PROGRESS OF MAHOMETANISM. 16*7 What parties arose amons; the Arabs after the death of Mahomet? Who was chosen to fill his place? What exploits were achieved by the Mussulmans under Abn-Beker ? What changes in the army were produced by the election of Omar to the dignity of Caliph? 168 How did the war continue to be carried on between the Greeks and the Saracens ? How was the conquest of Syria and Palestine completed by the Sara- cens? 169 What was their success in Mesopotamia? What was at that time the conduct of the Greek emperors? CONQUEST OF THE SARACENS IN EGYPT. Which of the Mussulman generals marched into Egypt? - What happened to Amrou at Alexandria? ITO How was'Amrou saved from an imminent danger? When did he commence the siege of Alexandria? How long did the siege last, and how were both the city and the whole country subdued by the Saracens? What became of the Alexandrian Library ? lYl What attempt was made by Amrou? What was the end of Omar's life, and how many conquests were achieved during his reign ? What was the character of Omar ? CONQUEST OF THE SARACENS IN PERSIA, &C. Under whom was the subjugation of Persia completed?- What exer- tions were made by the Persians to defend their country? 172 What was the result of the battle of Cadesia? What important capture was made, and what new victory gained, by Saad, the Saracen general ? What battle gave the deadly blow to the Persian monarchy? ns What became of king Isdegerdes, and of his kingdom? What other conquests were achieved about this time by the Mussul- mans? 174 What obstacles checked the further progress of the Saracen arms in western Asia? Who was the head of the Ommiade dynasty? What parties arose among the Mahometans, which have continued till this day ? ON MODERN HISTORY. 15 THE GREEK EMPIRE, &C. PAGE How did the Greek emperor, Constantine Pogronatus, begin his reign? 175 With what courage and skill did he defend his capital against the Saracpns? What was the Grecian fire, and by whom had it been invented ? What disasters overtook the Mussulman troops and vessels? What other services did Pogonatus render to the state, and also to the Church? 176 What events followed his death ? With what success did the Arabs resume their course of conquest? Describe the battle at Yakoube in Africa? 177 What was the stratagem resorted to b}- Zobeir? How were the Saracens completely victorious? Who gained another victory near Tripoli? ^ How was conducted the expedition of Oucba? 17^ What imprudence Avas committed by Oucba? AYith what resolution did he fight? AVhat. was the result of Zuheir's expedition? Who attacked and took Carthage? 179 When was the reduction of northern Africa completed by the Saracens? SARACENS IN SPAIN. Under what circumstances and by whom were the Saracens called into Spain ? What was the respective strength of the opposite armies? Describe the battle of Xerxes? 180 What event made the Goths lose courage, and what became of king . Roderic ? What was the result of the battle of Xerxes ? In what part of Spain and nnder whose conduct did the Christians maintain their independence ? LEOTHEISAURIAN. 181 What disasters befell the Saracens in their second attempt upon Con- stantinople? What is said of Leo the Isaurian ? Against what did he publish an edict ? How long and cruel a persecution was exercised against the defen Jers of Images? CHARLES MARTEL. 182 How did the Arabs and Moors invade France? What was the. danger that threatened France and all Christendom? AVho was the hero destined to save both ? HoAV did the French fight the Saracen host near Tours? 183 What was the importance and the splendor of their victory? How did Charles Martel govern the French monarchy ? What cir- cumstances favored the accession of his son Pepin to the throne? How was an end put to the Merovingian dynasty? PEPIN, KING OF FRANCE. 184 How did Pepin show himself worthy of his high station? What was by this time the situation of Italy ? For what motives and with Avhat success did Pepin attack the Lom- bards ? What was the result of his second expedition? 49* 16 QUESTIONS TAGS 185 What kind of embassy was sent to him from Constantinople? To whom did lie make a donation of his conquests in Italy ? How were the Mussulman Caliphs Ommiades overthrown and suo ceeded by the Abassides ? Who founded the kingdom of Cordova? CHARLEMAGNE, KING, &C. 186 What advantages were gained by Pepin over the Saracens of Spain ? What were the chief qualifications of Pepin ? How did he fully make up for the shortness of his size ? By whom was Pepin even surpassed in his great actions ? IST What are the splendid characteristics of the reign of Charlemagne? What were the first exploits of Charlemagne? Against whom did he march with his troops into Italy? What journey did he take to Rome, and how did he annihilate the kingdom of the Lombards? What was the occasion and the result of his expedition into Spain ? 188 What circumstances obliged him repeatedly to fight the Saxons? What were the exertions of Witikind against a foreign yoke ? What vigor and severity did Charlemagne use against the Saxons ? How was the war still carried on between the two parties? 189 What was the desire of Charlemagne, and what offers did he make to the Saxon leaders ? How was AVitikind at length induced to make his submission, and how was an end put to the Saxon war ? What other exploits and conquests were achieved by Charlemagne ? 190 By what means did he secure the splendor and tranquility of hia empire? To what objects did he now chiefly apply himself? What were his exertions for the revival of literature and learning? 191 What was the reputation of Charlemagne, and how extensive were his dominions? How was the title of emperor conferred upon him? What modesty did he evince on that occasion ? -192 How many titles did Charlemagne now unite in himself? What was the frequency of public calamities in those times, and how far can it be ascribed to a want of civilization ? 193 What confusion and evils were produced by the invasion of bar- barians ? What was the decay of arts and sciences? How far did it extend? Who were among the eminent scholars? What were some of the discoveries, and when were they made ? How did religion stem the torrent of barbarism? , 194 What happy changes did she effect among the conquering tribes ? What was the influence of Christianity on the civilization of Europe? What was done by bishops, priests and monks for the manifold advantage of society ? 195 How zealously did the clergy and monks labor for the preservation ol science and the improvement of agriculture? What benefits were conferred by the Popes upon Europe and all Christendom ? I ON MODERN HISTORY. 17 Part IV. — Revival of the Western Empire — Beginning of the Crusadti. CHARLEMAGNE, EMPEROR. fAGE 196 How did Charlemagne signalize the beginning of his reign as emperor? What losses did he sustain in his family, and how did he close his glorious career? 197 What judgment ought to be passed on Charlemagne ? What were his talents for government and his exertions in the administratioD of justice? What successes did he obtain in war? 198 How far did he excel in learning and eloquence? What were the moral and Christian qualities of Charlemagne ? What was the simplicity of his manners, and his prudence in the management of his household ? 199 What magnificence did he display as a sovereign, and what public works owed to him their existence ? LOUIS THE DEBONNAIRE, AND HIS SONS. 200 Who was the successor of Charlemagne ? Between whom was the empire of Charlemagne divided after the death of Louis the Debonnaire ? What was the rise and the progress of the Feudal system ? ARABIAN AND GREEK EMPIRES? 201 What wfis the situation of the Arabian empire under Caliph Aaron- Al-Raschid ? Against whom did Aaron-Al-Raschid wage war? what was his char- acter ? What is said of his severity ? What did he do for literature? What happened to the Arabian monarchy after the death of Aaron- Al-Raschid ; and what disaster was brought upon the Greeks by the imprudence of their emperor Nicephorus ? 202 By what victories did Leo the Armenian repel the Bulgarians and almost annihilate their power ? How did he govern the empire ? By whom was he succeeded ? 203 How did the emperor Theophilus wage war against the Saracens? AVhat happened at the siege and capture of Amorium? Under what prince, and in whose intrigues did the Greek schism ori- ginate ? 204 What was the progression of that schism, and the fate of its first author Photius? With what vigor did Basil the Macedonian protect the state against foreign and domestic foes? What was the happy fruit of the vigilance and firmness of Basil ? 205 What accident deprived him of his life? What rank does he deserve among the Greek emperors ? SPAIN DURING THE 9TH AND IOTH CENTURIES. How did the kingdom of Asturias in Spain increase in extent and power ? 206 What kings most contributed to that increase? How did Alfonso III quell domestic conspiracies? What were his last exploits, together with the last disturbances of his reign? With what vicissitudes of success was the war now carried on between the Christians and the Moors of Spain? 18 QUESTIONS r4GE 207 What qualities distinguished Lue Arabian king Abderame III? Hon did he maice arts and sciences flourish in Cordova? W hat proved best the greatness and superiority of his mind ? Who was Mahomet Almanzor? With what opponent did he meet at first, and how did he wage war against the Christians. 208 What victory did he gain over King Burmudes II? What did Almanzor do to stop the flight of his troops ? What did he do after this victory ? How was his progress of conquest stopped ? 209 What was now the respective strength of the Moors and of the Chris- tians in Spain ? ENGLAND IN THE 9tH AND IOTH CENTURIES. What was, during the middle ages, the situation of England, and what causes led to the ruin of the Heptarchy ? Who was Egbert, and what contradictions did' he first experience ? How did Egbert receive the crown of Wessex, and then extend his authority over a great part of England ? 210 Against what new foes had he to defend his kingdom? With what obstinate perseverance did the Danes invade the British isles ? 211 Under what unfavorable auspices did the reign of Alfred commence? What events revived the courage of the Saxons ? How were the Danes defeated, and what terms of peace were imposed on them? SI 2 How did Alfred improve the British army and navy? What was his merit as a legislator ? What were his exertions for the advancement of science and of all useful arts ? 213 What were his last military achievements ? How fully did Alfred deserve the epithet of Great^ and what was the chief praise of that monarch ? By whom w^as he succeeded on the throne ? 214 Who was the real founder of the kingdom of England? What calamities and disasters did England again experience ? FRANCE AND GERMANT. What settlement did the Normans obtain in France; and when was the imperial sceptre transferred from the family of Charlemagne to the German princes? What evils in the meanwhile prevailed throughout the French kingdom? 215 Why was the crown refused to the Duke of Lorraine, and to whom was it offered ? How did he govern the state, and what rule of succession did he establish? W^hen did the German empire become elective? Who were, under this mode of accession, its first sovereigns ? 216 How did Henry the Fowler check the ravages of the baroarians ? With what zeal did he promote the safety and happiness of his people? Who W'as chosen to succeed him in the empire ? Who occupied the German throne after Otho I? THE EASTERN If A T I N S , &C. 217 What was the situation of the Greek empire? Why and when was Nicephorus Phocas raised to the sovereign power? What rendered Nicephorus odious, and occasioned his death? What were the qualifications of Zimisces? ON MODERN HISTORY. 19 PAGE 218 What victories did he gain over the Russians? "What advantages did he obtain over the Saracens? What was the cause and the manner of his death? 219 Who reigned after Ziniisces. and how -was Bulgaria entirely subdued? What was the martial spirit of Basil II, and the character of hia administration ? What losses were sustained by the Arabian Caliphs? i20 What conquests w^ere achieved by the Seljukian Turks? IRELAND. Of what country have we now to speak ? What was the origin and the government of the Irish nation? When and by whom were the Irish converted to Christianity? How far did they excel in virtue and science? 221 What ravages were committed by the Danes in Ireland? Who put a check to their depredations? How were the Danes again signally defeated? 222 What were for Ireland the happy consequences of the battle of Clontarf? DANISH KINGS IN ENGLAND. Who was Edmund Ironside^ and what did he perform for the defence of his country ? How did Canute treat both his ancient and his new subjects? 223 What striking proof did Canute give of his piety? What was the extent of his dominions, and how were they divided after his death ? What were the qualities of King Edward the Confessor, and the bles- sings of his reign ? 224 What statutes were published by him, and what honor was paid to his memory ? NORMANS IN ENGLAND. Who claimed the throne of England after Edward's death? Who was first proclaimed king? Against whom had Harold to con- tend ? 225 How did William of Normandy land on the shores of England ? Describe the battle of Hastingo ? How did William obtain a complete victory? 226 What was the result of the battle? What measures were first adopted by William with regard to govern- ment? Why were the English displeased and discontented? 227 What severity was now used against them? How did William bafifle the efforts of all his enemies? Where did he die? NORMANS IN ITALY. Who obliged the Saracens to abandon the siege of Salernum? 228 What exploits were performed by the Normans in Italy? Who were the most distinguished among them? CHIVALRY. In what did ancient chivalry consist? 229 What was the renown of Diaz of Bivar, otherwise called El Cid? How was Toledo taken from the Saracens ? Which of the foreign knights most signally assisted the Spaniards 'a their war against the Moors? And what was the origin of tiio kingdom of Portugal ? 20 QUESTIONS AFFAIR OF INVESTITURE. PA6B 230 What was meant by Investiture? How did the German emperoi Henry IV, dispose of ecclesiastical dignities, and who opposed hira in his Avicked practices? What sentence was passed by Pope Gregory VH against the emperor? 231 To what signs of penance and humiliation did Henry submit himself? How long did his repentance last, and what competitor Avas opposed to him by the German lords ? 232 What new excesses did he commit? How did the Pope depart this life? What was the end of the emperor's life, and how was the question of investitures settled after his death ? REMARKS ON THE MIDDLE AGES? What were the middle ages ? 233 How far did ignorance prevail, and how was it opposed by the Church? 234 How many learned clergymen flourished during those ages? What must be said to the praise of laymen themselves during the same period ? 235 What useful discoveries and improvements did then take place? Were the Arabs truly superior, in solid acquirements, to the Christian nations of Europe? 236 What do the monuments of architecture still -extant prove in favor of the middle ages ? What splendid and religious edifices were then built in various parts of Christendom? 231 What nations of Europe became converted and civilized? What must be concluded from this variety' of evidences and facts in favor of the Catholic Church ? What other excellent institution owed its existence to the middle ages? What had been the sad effects of the Feudal system ? ■ What barrier was opposed by religion to the prevailing evils? 238 What were the happy results of the Truce of God ? Part V — From the beginning of the Crusades to their end. ORIGIN AND CAUSE OF THE CRUSADES. 239 What eventful period is now to be considered ? What is meant by Crusades, and in what causes did they originate / What cruelties were committed in the Holy Laud by the Aralas and Turks against the Christians ? FIR ST CRUSADE. 240 Who was Peter the Hermit? What did he contrive for the deliverance of Jerusalem ? With what zeal and success did he preach the crusade? Where and how was taken the final decision for the crusade? 241 What was the eagerness of the people every where to take the cross? Who were the chief crusaders? Which of them held the first rank in the army ? What was the whole number of the crusaders, and what became of their first troops? 242 Where was the general rendezvous of the various bodies of the army ? ON MODERN HISTORY. 21 PAGE What were the feelings of the Greek emperor Alexius at the arrival of so many warriors? What city was besieged first by the Christian host? What is said of this town ? How was Nice attacked and defended? How did it fall into the hands of the emperor Alexius ? 243 How did the crusaders begin to make conquests for themselves ? Who obtained the sovereign power in Edessa? What encounter took place near Ddrylaeum in Phrygia? 244 How were the Turks finally defeated ? What was the respective loss of the Christians and the Turks ? What dangers and sufferings had the former now to undergo ? What vicissitudes of events happened during the siege of Antioch ? 245 How was Antioch taken by the crusaders? What fresh enemy arrived to attack them? V\'hat famine raged, and what desolation reigned in Antioch ? 246 What circumstances revived the courage of the troops ? How did the Christians march out to fight the enemy? What valor did they evince, and what victory did they obtain? 247 What were the consequences of the battle of Orontes ? What new calamities and losses did the crusaders sustain? 248 How did they advance to Jerusalem ? What is said of their pious transports ? What plague afflicted the besieging army ? With what vigor was Jerusalem assaulted? 249 What efforts were made in a new attack, and how was the holy city at length taken? What was the fury of the conquerors in the first moments of victory ? What marks of fervent devotion did they afterwards exhibit, and whom did they appoint king of Jerusalem? 250 What brilliant victory crowned all the exploits of the crusaders? GENERAL VIEW, &C. How should the first crusade be regarded ? 251 To what circumstances did the crusaders owe their success? What became of the chief leaders of the crusade ? 252 What story is related of two noble twin-brothers? KINGDOM OF JERUSALEM. With -vrhat wisdom did Godfrey support and govern his kingdom of Jerusalem ? 253 When did he die? What was his character? 254 What were the exertions of the successors of Godfrey, and those of the Greek emperors ? When and how did the prosperity of the eastern Christians begin to decline ? THE SECOND CRUSADE. 255 What was the occasion of the second crusade? Who preached it, and what nations took a share in it? How were the Germans betrayed by the Greeks, and destroyed by the Turks? 256 What was the first success of the French ? What fault was committed by one of their generals? How was the rear of their army entirely defeated ? What city was besieged by the crusaders? How were thei- efforts totally frustrated ? 22 QUESTIONS 257 What grief was produced by the failure of the second crusade, and how did St. Bernard vindicate his conduct in having been its chief promoter ? GERMANY AND ITALY, UNDER FREDERICK I. How did the emperor Frederic Barbarossa fail in bis attempts to raise a schism in the Church and to subjugate Italy ? 258 How did he come to a reconciliation with the Pope and the Italians? What disturbances agitated England ? What was the extent of Henry Plantagenet's dominions? '25Q What remarkable events took place during his reign? What hap- pened to St. Thomas of Canterbury ? How was Ireland conquered by the English? What qualities did Henry II evince in his various transactions, and what misfortunes did he experience ? FALL OF THE KINGDOM OF JERUSALEM. 260 By whom were the affairs of the Christians in the East brought to a rapid decay ? What were the abilities of Saladin ? How did Saladin invade Palestine, and what resolution was taken by the king of Jerusalem? Under what unfavorable circumstances was fought the battle of Tiberias ? 261 In what manner was the battle continued and terminated ? How did Saladin improve his victory, and obtain the surrender of the Holy city? THIRD CRUSADE. 262 What consternation did the fall of Jerusalem spread through Christen- dom? Which of the European monarchs engaged in a new crusade ? Who set out the first for Asia? What triumphs marked the progress of the Germans ? 263 By what fatal accident was their emperor carried off? What was the result of the death of Frederic? What were the opposite qualities of kings Philip and Richard ? How had the siege of Acre hitherto been conducted ? 264 How did the arrival of the two monarchs contribute to the reddltion of Acre ? What incidents accompanied the siege of that city ? Why did Philip withdraw from the crusade? 265 How did the Christian army advance through Palestine ? What engagement took place near Antipatris ? How was the engagement renewed, and the enemy again defeated? 266 How did Richard lose the advantage of his victory ? How did he continue to wage war against the Moslems? How did he repeatedly vanquish the troops of Saladin ? 26Y What impression was produced by the sight or knowledge of Richard's valor? What truce was agreed upon between him and Saladin ? 268 What was the result of the third crusade, and which of those engaged in it displayed most ability ? What were the adventures of Richard on his way back to England? THE FOURTH CRUSADE. 269 When and how did Saladin close his career ? What dissensions among the Moslems followed his death? By whom was a new crusade undertaken, and how did it terminate? ON MODERN HISTORY. 23 THE FIFTH CRUSADE. PAOK 210 Who promoted, who preached, and who undertook another expedition? What treaty was concluded between the new crusaders and the Veni- tians? What revolution had lately happened in Constantinople, and how were the crusaders induced to assist the dethroned emperor? 271 With what vigor and success was Constantinople attacked by the La- tins ? What incidents occasioned the utter ruin of the emperors Isaac and Alexius? 272 What were the feelings of the crusaders at the news of the young em- peror's murder? What was the result of their fresh attempt to storm the celestial city? What was the success of another assault? 273 How was Constantinople pillaged by the conquerors? Which of the Latin princes was elected emperor ? 274 What became of the heroes of the fifth crusade, and of the empire which they had founded ? WARS THROUGHOUT EUROPE. What was, by this time, the situation of western Europe, and particu- larly of Spain ? How did the Christians march against the Miramolin ? 275 By what exertions of courage did they obtain a complete victory? What where the subsequent losses of the Moors ? 276 By whom was claimed the imperial crown of Germany? With what advantage did Philip Augustus wage war against the Eng- lish monarchs ? What league was formed against France? Where did the two armies meet ? Describe the battle of Bonvines. 277 What happened to King John on his return to England ? How was Louis of France called to receive the English crown ? How was he obliged to leave the country, and what was the duration of his reign as king of France? 278 Who were the Albigenses? W^hat measures were taken in their regard ? By whom were they de- feated ? CONQUESTS OF CENGHIS-KAN IN ASIA. 279 Of what revolutions was Asia the theatre? Who was Temujin or Genghis-Kan ; and how did he obtain the sove- reign power? 280 How did he confirm his authority, and extend his dominions? How were the Chinese subdued by Genghis-Kan ? What disasters and losses were inflicted on Mohammed, the sultan of Karazm and Persia ? 281 How successfully did the sons of Genghis-Kan pursue his conquests in the East? How far did they carry the devastations of war towards the West? WL-at ardor for the deliverance of Jerusalem was displayed by children ? THE SIXTH CRUSADE. 282 What was the complicated character of the sixth crusade? How was the city of Daraietta besieged and taken by the crusaders? 283 What was their disappointment in their advance towards Cairo? 50 24 QUESTION* TAGS What losses did tbey sustain, and what conditions were they obliged to accept ? What was done by Frederick II for the recovery of Jerusalem? Who next visited Palestine ? THE SEVENTH CRUSADE. 284 What was, at this period, the situation of England ? What prosperity did France enjoy under Louis IX ? How did that prince conquer his domestic and foreign enemies? 285 On what occasion did he take the cross ? What preparations were made for the crusade ? Where did the Christian army spend the winter, and what country did it attack first ? 286 What happened at the passage of the Nile, and in the attempt upon the city of Massoura? What were the consequences of the battle, and the disasters of the retreat ? 287 How did St. Louis behave in his prison? How did he rescue himself from captivity, and when did he return to France? CIVIL WAR IN ENGLAND. By what means did he promote the happiness of his people ? What important debate was referred to his decision ? 288 Who raised in England the standard of insurrection against King Henry III ? What made the people desire the restoration of Henry, and how did Prince Edward destroy the league of his enemies ? EIGHTH AND LAST CRUSADE. What considerations induced St. Louis to undertake another crusade ? 289 Why did he land on the shores of Africa? What plague desolated his army, and how was he himself carried off by the contagious disease ? 290 How many different qualities were united in St. Louis ? What is said of his religious exercises? Of his piety, &c.? How was the crusade continued and terminated ? 291 How did every thing now tend to the utter expulsion of the Christians from Syria ? By whom was Ptolemais besieged and captured ? What became of tlae inhabitants of Ptolemais? 292 What rendered fruitless every attempt to renew the crusades? What charges have been brought against the crusades? What motives animated the crusaders ? Was it proper to go and attack the Moslems of Asia ? 293 Upon what reasons did Pope Urban II urge the Christians to take up arms against the Moslems ? What is to be thought of the number of those who are said to have pex-ished in the crusades ? 294 How wrong and unjust is it to inveigh Against their devotedness ? Does the variety of disorders occasionally committed by them afford a just reason to impeach the lawfulness of the crusades? 295 Were not also many glorious feats and acts of virtue performed by the crusaders ? What made the crusades fail with regard to the possession of Palestine? What was the first advantage of the crusades? What was another happy effect? What was the third advantage? What was the fourth ; and what cations increased in power and wealth ? ON MODERN HISTORY. 25 PAaK Ho\y did they tend to revive literature, arts and science? and what universities grew into existence about this time? 2^1 "What conclusion ought to be drawn from these remarks, in favor of the crusades? PART VI. — From the end of the Crusades to the Discovery of America. ENGLAND, AVALES, &C. 298 What was the duration of the reign of Edward I, and the character of his government? When and bj what exertions did Edward subdue the principality of Wales ? 299 How did he succeed in his attempt to conquer Scotland? Who were the most famous champions of Scottish liberty ? GERMANY, &C. What Avas the state of Germany after Frederic II ? By whom was good order and triinquility restored? What provinces were then lost to the German empire ? 300 What revolution took place in Switzerland? What invasion was prepared against Switzerland ; and what victory did the Helvetians win over the Austrians? 301 What was the valor displayed by fift}^ exiles? HoAV Avas the Helvetian confederacy strengthened and completed? PROSECCTION OF THE KNIGHTS TEMPLARS. 302 What was the state of degeneracy of the Knights Templars, and of what crimes Avere they accused? V\'"hat new inquires Avere made about their guilt? What further measure Avas taken against them? What was the result of the trials to Avhich they Avere subjected ? 303 What was the fate of the grand-master and other chiefs of the order ? HoAV Avas the order itself suppressed ? What became of its properties? THE CHRISTIANS IN SPAIN. 304 What was the situation of Spain at this period ? 305 What made not only Spain, but all Christendom, tremble? What Avere the exertions of King Alfonso XI to save his country ? What signal victory was gained by the Christians over the Moors ? 306 What Avere the subsequent triumphs of the former and losses of the latter? What struggle commenced then between England and France ? EDWARD III OF ENGLAND, &C. What Avas the object of the dispute between Edward III and Philip "VI? 307 By what considerations was Edward induced to declare Avar against Philip? What victory was gained at sea by the English? 308 What new efforts were made on each side for the prosecution of the war? HoAv Avere the French defeated at Crecy ? What circumstances contributed to the victory of the English? What happened at the seige of Calais? 309 Who defeated the Scots at Nevil's cross? For what reasons did Edward conclude a truce with Philip? 26 QUESTIONS VXQB 310 What dreadful plague visited France and England ? What is said ol the number of its victims? What were the qualifications of Philip, and the other occurrences of his reign ? Who succeeded him on the throne? By whom were the hos ilities recommenced? 311 What Avas the situation of the English at Maupertuis, and how did the French act ? How were the French defeated by the English ? What was the consequences of the battle ? Where was King John led prisoner ? 312 How did Edward III endeavor to secure the fruit of his victories? What was the sad condition of France at that period? 312 How was the next campaign conducted by the Dauphin? 313 What event induced Edward to grant peace, and upon what terms did he grant it? With what fidelity did John comply with the treaty of Bretigny? How did Cha. ''es V restore tranquility to his kingdom ? 314 What cruelties were committed by the Castilian King, Don Pedro ? By whom was he dethroned, and by whom reestablished? How did he repay the services of the Black Prince ? What new struggle took place between Don Pedro and Henry of Transtamare ? 315 What treaty was concluded between the new king of Castile and Charles V ? What were now the successes of the French against the English? What truce was concluded, and by what events was it followed ? 316 What were the personal, military and political accomplishments of Edward III ? What were the distinguishing features of the governmentof Charles V? 31"? What new empire arose in the East? OTTOMAN EMPIRE. What conquests were achieved by Othman and Orcan? 318 By what institutions and exertions did Amurat consolidate the throne of the Turkish sultans ? What city did he chose as his capital, and how did he lose his life? Why was Bajazet I surnamed llderim ? Whom did he conquer first, and by whom was he defeated in Mel- davia ? 319 How did he treat the Greek emperors? What league was formed against Bajazet ? 320 How did he overthrow the French and Hungarians in the battle of Nicopolis? What were the consequences of the battle? TAMSRLANE, &C. 321 Who was Tamerlane? What motives induced Tamerlane and Bajazet to declare war against each other ? What ravages marked the progress of the Tartars? What awful conflict took place near Ancyra? 322 How w>is Bajazet treated by his conqueror ? What question wa? asked him, and how did he answer? What was his fate ? To Avhom is Tamerlane assimilated? What "wa? the character of his exploits ? ON MODERN HISTORY. 2T PAGB 323 What virtues did he disj)lay in the ordinary transactions of his liic? "What were his intellectual and political falculties? 324 What other extraordinarj' features appeared in Tamerlane? How did he close his career? What events took place, by this time, in England and France? 325 How did England quickly reassume her former ascendency ? HENRY AND CHARLES VI, &C. Who was Henry V ? AVhat was his first success against the French ? How was fought the battle of Agincourt? 326 What fresh advantages were obtained by the English in France?. When did both Charles VI and Henry V die, and who were their successors ? 321 What was the dejected situation of Charles VII? How was the seige of Orleans conducted? Who was Joan d'Arc? What mission did she claim, and how was sne examined at court? 328 How did she raise the seige of Orleans, and defeat the English? How did she lead the king to Rheiras? 328 How was the ceremony of the coronation performed? How did Joan happen to fall into the hands of the English? How was she neglected by her friends, and treated by her enemies? By whom and when was her condemnation reversed? What is the substance of the note on page 329 ? 329 Were the English able to stop the progress of the French? 330 What improvements did France receive from the administration of Charles VII ? In what circumstances were the hostilities renewed, and what losses were sustained by the English ? What was then the state of Poland and of Germany ? FALL OF CONSTANTINOPLE. 331 How did the Turks resume their course of conquests? 'What was the design of Mahomet II ? What were the opposite qualifications of Mahomet U and Constantine Paleologus ? What preparations of war were made on each side? 332 What military engines were made use of by the Turks during the seige of Constantinople? What exertions were made by the Greeks? How did the Greeks repel a furious assault ? 333 What victory was v.on at sea hy a Christian flotilla? How did Mahomet succeed in transporting his vessels into Ihe harbor of Constantinople? 334 What virtues were displayed by Constantine Paleologus? What were the proposals reciprocally made by Constantine and Ma- homet? M A H O M E T II, k C. What apprehensions were entertained by Mahomet, and how did he revive the courage of his troops? 335 How was the garrison of Constantinople aflWte-l ? What was tbelaBX address of Poleologus to his warriors? When and how did a general assault begin? 33G How did it continue and terminate? 33T How was the imperial city, with its inhabitants, treated by the cou- querors ? 50* 28 QUESTIONS What remarks can be made on the fall of the Greek empire ? What did the Sultan do after his victory, and how did he pursue the coarse of his conquests. 338 In what attempt did he fail, and who checked his progress? Who was John Corvinus Hunniades? How was Belgrade beseiged by the Turks, and succored by Hunniades? 339 What attacks were made on the town ? What exploits were performed on both sides? How Avere the Turks finally defeated ? 340 What was thp end of Hunniades, and what grief was produced by the news of his death ? Who was Scanderbeg ? Who first experienced the effects of Scanderbeg's undaunted valor? 341 How were the armies of Mahomet repeatedly defeated by Scanderbeg? In what circumstances did Scanderbeg happen to die? How much was he regretted ? 342 What were the military qualities of Scanderbeg? What were his Christian virtues ? What armament was directed against the island and the city of Rhodes? AVith what valor did \he Rhodians and the Knights of St. John defend themselves? MAHOMET AND d'AUBUSSON. 343 How was a general assault carried on, and resisted ? What was the magnanimity displayed by the Grand-Master? By what other noble and virtuous actions did Peter d'Aubusson dis- tinguish himself? 344 What were the projects of Mahomet, and what put an end to his life ? What judgment ought to be passed upon him? CONTESTS BETWEEN THE HOUSES OF LANCASTER AND YORK. In what state of agitation was England ? 345 What discontent existed against the court, and who commenced the civil war ? What was the atrocious character, and who were the chief leaders, of that war? ' By what alterations of success was it marked? 346 What strange adventures happened to Queen Margaret and her son ? What were her exertions, her hopes, and the final catastrophe of her whole family ? 34t What fresh disturbances arose in England? When and how were they terminated ? FERDINAND AND ISABELLA. How was the Spanish monarchy rendered, at this period, flourishing and' powerful ? 348 What losses were sustained by the Moors ? In what manner was the siege of Granada conducted by Ferdinand and Isabella? What considerations induced the king and the inhabitants of Granada to surrender? 349 When did the Castilian sovereigns take possession of the city? What became of King Boabdil? How were the other Moors treated? How did Spain acquire a high degree of splendor and preponderance? II ON MODERN HIStORY. 29 REMARKS ON DISCOVERIES, &C. 350 What remarks can be made on the sixth part of Modern History ? Bv whom was gun-powder invented, and what influence had this invention on military tactics ? 351 To what year is referred the invention of painting in oil ? " " " ofmaking paper from linen rags? «' " '' of the art of printing? When and by whom were post-horses established? What were the most important discoveries of the fifteenth century ? What is said about printers in the note on page 351 ? Part VII. — From the Discovery of America to the Treaty of Versailles. PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS. 352 Was the American continent known to the ancient nations ? Does the ancient population of America form any difficulty among learned men? 353 Can it be accounted for by regular navigation ? '' " by the crossing of Behring strait? " " by winds and tempests ? 354 What was, with regard to civilization, the state of the American tribes at the time of their discovery? DISCOVERT OF AMERICA. Who was Christopher Columbus ? How did Columbus begin to form his theory about the existence of unknown lands ? 355 What incidents impressed this theory more and more upon his mind? To whom did he apply for co-operation in the execution of his projects ? What encouragement and assistance did he receive from the Spanish court ? What were the incidents of his voyage across the Atlantic? What land was first descried ? 356 What were the honors then paid to Columbus? What were his own feelings and his subsequent discoveries ? When and how did Columbus return to Spain ? 357 What reception did he experience at court ? What grant was obtained by the Spanish sovereigns from the Pope? When did Columbus sail on a second expedition ? What was his dis- appointment on arriving at Hayti? 358 How were his good intentions and measures counteracted by his com- panions? Wliat induced him to return? What happened to him in Spain, and what important discovery did he make in his third voyage? What did the party of his enemies contrive against him? S59 AA^hat magnanimity did Columbus display in the midst of injuries? How was he received by his sovereigns ? What had he to suffer in his last voyage ? What stratagem did he make use of to change the dispositions of tha Indians? 360 How did he succeed in his attempt? How was he rescued from his l^erilous situation ? In what circumstances and with what sentiments of piety did he die? What were the qualities and excellent views of Columbus ? 30 QUESTIONS PAGE 361 By whom was he deprived of the honor of giving his name to the new world ? PORTUGUESE SENTIMENTS. What expeditions from different quarters had followed the first enter- prise of Columbus? What rank did the East Indies hold among the states of Asia? 362 What resistence did the Portuguese experience from Eastern Indians? How far did the Portuguese extend their commercial relations ? What is the antiquity claimed by the Chinese? What is the population and religion of China? What fortifications protect its northern frontier ? Did these fortifica- tions save China from invasion ? 363 What are the good and the bad qualities of the Chinese? What is Japan? What are the revenues and forces of the sovereign of that country ? By whom was Christianity preached, and by whom was it abolished, in Japan ? DECLINE OF THE ITALIAN REPUBLICS. 364 What decline in wealth and power did the Italian republics suffer? By what other calamity was Italy afflicted ? What was the result of the expedition of King Charles VIII ? Under whom did a second expedition take place? 365 Why was a powerful league formed against the Venetians, and soon turned against the French? What were the reverses of France and of her allies ? How were the Swiss defeated at Marignan ? What intrepidity did Francis I display ii the battle? 366 What were the fruits of his victory ? How and when did Ferdinand of Spain terminate his career ? Who contributed most with Ferdinand and Isabella to the glory of their reign ? What is said of Cardinal Ximenes? By whom was promoted the complete revival of fine arts and literature? L u T H E R & c. 367 How was the peace of Europe again disturbi'd ? Who was Luther? What sort of reputation did he acquire? How was he led to attack first some private abuses, afterwards ever several tenets universally admitted in the Church ? 368 What were, in the beginning, the feelings of Luther ; when did he break of all ties of submission to the Roman Pontiff? What language did he use against the Pope, and against his various opponents? AVhat circumstances chiefly increased the number of his followers ? What did Zuinglius and Calvin endeavor to effect ? 369 Whence came the name of Protestants ? When did Luther die, and what council condemned his doctrines? CHARLES V AND FRANCIS I. By whom was the imperial crown of Germany simultaneously claimed ? 370 Who thought himself injured, and how were the hostilities commenced between Charles V and Francis I? How did Francis conduct the war? What imprudence did he commit? How was his army entirely de feated. and he himself taken prisoner ? On what conditions did recover his liberty? 871 How was the war renewed, carried on, and terminated? ON MODERN HISTORY 31 CFIARLES V AND SOLIMAN II. Fxan What motive induced Charles V to conclude peace with Francis? What conquests had been lately made by tlie Turks? What was tiie success of Solimaii II in liis first expedition against Hungary •* 372 What resistance did the Knijjhts Hospitallers oppose to his attack upon Rhodes,' By whom were they betrayed ? How did they leave the island of Rhodes, and obtain a new residence? 373 What were the subsequent occupations of trohman? How did he again defeat the Hunparians, but fail in the siege of Vienna? When did he reappear, and how was he opposed by the emperor Charles V. CONQUEST OF MEXICO. 374 By whom was the empire of Charles vastly increased? What was the spirit of the Spaniards at this period ? Who conceived the idea of establishing colonies in Mexico ? What were the forces of Cortez ? How did he make himself independent of Velas- quez, and inspire his troops with desperate courage? 375 What happened to the Spaniards in their march towards Mexico ? How did they reach the city? How were they received and treated by ihe emperor? How did Montezuma become a prisoner of Cortez, and a vassal of Charles V? 376 What new obstacles did Cortez find in his way? By what exertions ot activity and courage did he conquer Narvaez? How were hostilities commenced and conducted between the Mexicans and Spaniards.' 377 What happened to Coitez in his combats against the Mexicans ? How disastrous was the retreat of the Spaniards from Mexico? What new danger awaiteii them in the valley of Otumha? 378 What were the feelings of Cortez at the sight of the enemy, and how did he array his troops for battle ? How was the perilous conflict carried on ? What bold idea came to thi- mind of Cortez, and how did he execute it? 379 How signal was the victory won by the Spaniards? What reciption was givHn them atTlascala? Mow active was Cortez in pieparing a new expedition against Mexico? 380 In what manner did he distribute his forces for a successful attack upon the city? How did he himself advance with his brigantines across the lake.' What terrible overthrow did he give to the multitude of Indian canoes? 381 By what seri< s of exer'ions did the seige finally close in the capture of Mexico? How was the emperor Guatimozin treated by the conquerors? 382 Did not Cortez himself soon experience the vicissitudes of fortune? What variety of exploits were exhibited in his life, and what brilliant qualities appeared in his person ? 383 What rank does Cortez hold among the Spanish heroes ? CONQUEST OF PERU. Who was Francis Pizarro? What were his plans, attempts, and persevering efforta towards Ihe conquest of Peru? 384 What ciicumstances favored the views of Pizarro? How was the Peruvian Inca defeated and dealt with by the Spaniards? With what facility was the reduction of Peru completed ? What dissensions arose ainf)ng the cnnquerors, and what was the end of Pizarro? By what new disturbances was the death of Pizarro followed? CHARLES V CONTINUED. 3^5 With what success did Charles V wage a new war against France ? What were his exploits and his subsequent disasters in Africa? What was the result of his long struggle with the Protestant states of Germany ? 386 Whjary Stuart. t!>e queen ol" Scotland? What lo.--ses did the British navy inflict on the Spaniards? How was the Spanish Armada rompl«tel\ defeated? 289 How did Philip II receive the intelligence o\' the disastrous event' 32 QUESTIONS WAU AGAINST THE TURKS. l-AGE IIow were hostilities renewed between the Christians and the Turks ? What arraa- ment was sent against iVialta? 390 Who was the Grand-Master of St. John, and what plan did he contrive for the deience of thH island? What was the heroism displayed by the garrison of Fort St Elme? What energy uf sentiments and courage animated all classes of people? Sfll What intrepid magnanimity appeared in the Grand-Master? What prodigies ot valor were performed by both the besiegers and the besieged ? J592 What w^as the perplexity of the Turkish general? How wasl'' finally reduced to abandon the siege and evacuate the island ? How moving was tlie sight of the remaining defenders of Malta? In what state of desolation was the country? What noble design did La Valetie carry into effect? 393 What was the resentment of Soliman II ? Where did he perform his last exploit, and find the end of his life ? 394 What mixture of bad and good qualities ought to be acknowledged in Soliman ? Who was his successor? How was the island of Cyprus conquered by the Turks? What league was formed against them? 395 What victory did the Christians win at sea? What efiect had tlie battle of Lepanto on both the vanquished and the cohquerors? PHILIP II. 395 When and how was formed the republic of Holland? What had been the flourishing state of Portugal? What imprudence was committed by king Don Sebastian, and how did his kingdom pass underthe sway of Philip of Spait\? 397 How vastly extensive was the monarchy of Philip IE, and how firm his administration ? What were his views in regard to France, and how did they fail ? 398 When did lie die, and who was his successor? Who reigned in England after the deatli of Elizabeth? What peace did Europe then enjoy ? What storm was preparing against the house of Austria, and what event averted it for a time? What grief was occasioned by the tragical death of Henry IV? How respecte«l, even at present, is the memory of that monarch? THIRTY YEARS WAR. 399 When did the 30 years war begin? What were the chief belligerent powers on each side? Between whom did the first hostilities take place? Who was Gusiavus Adolphus? Why and how did he invade Germany? What new advantages were gained, and what losses were subsequently sustained by the Swedish army? 400 Who was reigning in France? VV'hathad been the administration of Cardinal Riche lieu, and how was the war now chiefly carried on between France and Austria? What victories were gained by the French? 401 Wlien and upon what terms was concluded the treaty of Westphalia ? CIVIL WAR IN ENGLAND. In what ferment was England at the death of James I, and the accession of Charles I ' 402 What was the Scottish covenant ? How did Charles and his adversaries come to an open rupture? What battles were won and lost by the king? How was he sold by the Scottish army to the English parliament? What new party had risen in England ? Who was Cromwell ? 403 How was Charles 1 tried and executed? How did Cromwell prostrate all his opponents? 404 How did he govern ihe English Common wealth? H(jw did he cause it to be respected abroad ? What treaty of alliance was concluded between him and France ? What expeditions took place in consequewce of that treaty? 405 How was terminated the war between France and Spain ? Had Cromwell, in his high station, enjoyed a real happiness? When did he die? What revolution placed the house of Stuart again upon the throne of England ? What was the stale of the British colonies in North America? 406 When and by whom were the most remarkable of these colonies established? What were the distinguishing features of the SRttlers of Maryland ? What were the settlements of the French in Canada and Louisiana? REIGN OF LOUIS XIV. 407 When did King Louis XIV take the reins of jrovernment into his own hands? What was the cliavacter of his public administration ? What was, under him, ilie splendor of arts and sciences, and the multitude of great men of every de'sciipiion ? 40ti What brilliant ages of antiquity were revived in the age of Louis XIV? What services did the king render to religion and humanity ? 409 What was tiie glory of his arms ? How were hostilities renewed against, and fresh advantages obtained ovci Spain .•' ON MODERN HISTORY. 33 PACK What treaty was concluded between the English and the Dutch? H''\v did Louis XIV assist the emperor Leopold aiiainst ihf Turks ' Wiiat succors did lie also grant to the Venetians ? How long lasted the siege otCandia? 41U VVliat were the losses sustained 011 each side? With what vigor and success did the Grand Viziei Kiuperii conduct and conclude ilie siege? What other services did he rmiier to ws sovereign? How did Louis XIV succeed in checking tlio depredations of the Algerine pirates? WAR OF HOLLAND, &C. ill How was Holland invaded by the French, and what saved the Dutch from utter ruin i What league was formed aiiainsl Louis XIV? Who was his only ally, and what victories did he gain at sea? What battles were fought by the prince of Cond^? 412 How did Marshal Turenne conduct his expedition agninst the Germans? How did he prepare the execution of his further designs ? 413 How did he surprise the different quarters of the confederates and oblige them to r<'cross the Rhine? What glory did he acquire on that occasion ? What was the last campaign of Turenne ? What tribute of grief and honor was paid to his memory? 414 What was done to compensate his loss? Who followed up his plan with success, and what rendered the year 1675 most remarkable? V\ ho maintained su[»eriorily of the PVench arms, and what treaty terminated the war ? What were, even after the conclusion of peace, the vigorous exertions of Louis XIV? LEAGUE OF AUSBURG. 415 Wiiat fresh league was formed against him, and what new revolution took place in England? IIow did James II lose the battle of Boyne ? 416 How was Admiral Tourville first victorious, and shortly after defeated at sea? What were the conquests and victories of the other French generals ? What was the respective strength of the hostile parties? 417 What induced the allies to conclude peace ? SUCCESSION OF SPAIN. Why was the war soon renewed, and how far did it extend ? 418, When did William III die? What was his character, and who took his place in the command of the allied armies? How were the French defeaied at Ilochstadt? What were now the exertions of Louis XI V ? 419 What reverses did his arms again experience in Spain, Flanders and Italy? What was the subsequent vicissitude of events in Spain and Flanders? 420 How did the winter of 1709 increase the misfortunes of France? Who lost the bat* tie of Malplaquet? What haughtiness did the confederates show to Louis XIV? What victories secured the throne of Spain to Philip V? 421 What induced Great Britain to withdraw from the confederacy against France ? Whom did Loui^ XIV send to fi^lit against his remaining enemies? V\niat important victory did Marshal Villars gain over Prince Eugene at Denaiii ? By what treaties was the war terminated ? 422 When and how did Louis XIV end his long and glorious reign ? DECLINE OP THE TURKS. What was yet the warlike spirit of the 'J'urks ? What army was sent to besiege Viennau' 423 How were they compelled to abandon the. siege ? How were they again defeated by king Sobiesky, and by the duke of Lorraine ? What new losses did they sustain ? Who was their most formidable enemy ? RISE OF PRUSSIA AND RUSSIA. 424 How did Prussia rise almost suddenly to a high rank among European nations? Who was Peter 1 ? What were his views and exertions for the civilization of Russia? How did Charles XII overcome at first all his enemies? 425 What victory did he gain at Narva? How was he defeated at Pultawa, and what Were his subsequent adventures ? WESTERN EMPIRE, &C. What improvements did Peter I make in his empire, and what glory did he secure to himself ? 426 Who were then the other leading sovereigns in Europe ? VViiat was the plan of Cardinal Alberoni, and how was it defeated? What p'dilical changes took place in Poland? 127 What were the advantages gained by the French and the Spaniards over the German emperor? What were the conditions of the treaty of Vienna? What success was also obtained by the Tuiks ? 428 Were they equally successful in their wars against Persia? What conquests were achieved by Thaiuas Kouli Kan ? Wi» i revolutions took place, after his death, in Persia? 34 QUESTIONS WAR OP THE SUCCESSION, &C. PACE * 429 What evnnt threw all Europe again into war? What sudlcni changes of fortune happened to the interested parties? V\ h;it niighi liave ended, and what protracted the hostilities ? How wtMe the French dt feated by the English at Dettingen? 430 How were the English defeated by the French at Fontenoy? What vicissitude- of goi d and ill success followed ' By what treaty was the contest tcrinin ti^d ? 431 What invasion was attempted upon England, and how did it faii ■• What were the adventures of the Pretender? 432 How did he make his escape ? What gave rise to the Old French war? Who were the allies of France and those of England? To whom were the first chances of the war favorable ? By whom and how were the French defeated at Rosbach? 433 How did they lose (iuebec and all Canada? What losses did they experience at sea? What became of their colonies, and how did their last resource fail? 434 What advantages were secured to England by the treaty of Paris? AMERICAN REVOLUTION, &C. What act was passed by the British parliament concerning America? How was the stamp-act received by the colonies? How was it repealed? 435 What further events provoked the resentinent of the Americans? What hostile measures were adopted by both parties ? What encounter took place near Lexington ? How was the battle of Bunker Hill fought? 436 Who was apptinted commander-in chief of the American forces, and how did Wash- ington conipf^l the British to evacuate Boston? What attempt was made upon Canada? Was there yet any hope or desire of reconciliation between the two parties? When and how was the Declaration of Independence drawn up and proclaimed ? 437 What was the prospect of affairs at ihe time of the declaration of independence ? Under what difficulties did Washington labor? What was ihe energy of his mind and the firmness of Congress? 438 What succors were obtained from foreign powers, and what nations aided the cause of America? What spirit and resources were displa5'ed by the English nation ? 439 What disastrous events happened shortly after the declaration of independence? What were the exertions and the exploits of Washington ? 440 What attack was made upon Stony Point? What was the intrepidity displayed by General Wayne and his troops ? How was the British commander Burgoyne captured with his whole army? What were the losses of the Americans in the southern states? 441 How did General Greene recover South Carolina? With what success did Lafayette oppose Lord Cornwallis ? 442 What mighty scheme was formed by W^ashington ? How was CornwaMis obliged to surrender? 143 How were hostilities carried on in other prirts of the world? When was the inde ppndence of the United States solemnly and universatly acknowledged? In what manner did Washington resign his commission ? What event properly closes ihe seventh part of Modern History? Part viii. — From the Treaty of Versailles, or Paris, to the year 1850. FEDERAL CONSTITUTION, &C. 444 What was deficient in the confederation of the United States? How was the framing of a federal constitution desired, prepared and executed .' 445 What are the chief points of the Federal Constitution? How was it opposed and supported? When did the newly framed government begin to act? What was the character of Washington's administration, and the public feeling in his regard? 446 What is the chief praise of Washington ? FRENCH REVOLUTION. Wl'it is thought to have been the proximate cause of the French revolution? To this what may be added? What was its pi iicipal, ilnmjh remote, cause? 447 r!y what fatal circumstances was the evii increased? \VhHt spirit aiiim-Ued the assembly of 1"89? Whiit persi-cution wa^ i arr ed on again>:t the clergy r 44Si Wh;U tyranny was exercnid against the nobles, and against the king himself? What hVcame of Louis XVI, and of his family? 449 Wnat slaughters and other exctssei? were ooramitted In France by the leaders of tlip revolution f ON MODERN HISTORY. 36 PACK. What insurrections took place in various parts of the kingdom ? What was the character of the war in La Vendue ? What was done by tiie emisjrants? How were they assisted by foreign powers? 450 What coalition was formed against the French republic ? What victories were gained, and what conquests achieved by the Frencli? NAPOLEON, &C. Who was Napoleon Bonaparte? How did he obtain the chief command of the army in Italy? 451 What were his peculiar tactics and his first exploits ? What victories did he gain, and what treaty put an end to his Italian cam- paign ? What expedition did he undertake into Egypt? 452 How were Malta and Alexandria subdued ? ' How was the expedition carried on, and how did it terminate ? How was Bonaparte appointed the head of the French government ? What revolutions had taken place in Italy during his absence? 450 What advantage did he obtain over the Austrians at Marengo? How did General Brune succeed in Holland, and Moreau in (Germany ? What treaties did France conclude with the Austrian court and the British gov- ernment ? 45-i What different acts of a wise, and tlien of an unjust administration, were per- formed by Bonaparte ? How was the island of San Domingo totally lost to the French ? What increase of power, and what new titles and appellations did Napoleon cause to be conferred on himself? 455 What led to an open rupture between France and England ? What were the designs of Napoleon against Great Britain ? What signal victory was gained at sea by the English ? 45G What splendid achievements were performed by Napoleon on the continent? How successful were the French against the Prussians and the Russians ? What were the terms of the treaty of Tilsit ? What was the Confederation of the Rhine ? What was the conduct of the English towards the Danes ? 457 How were hostilities revived between Austria and France ? What tremen- dous defeats and losses were again inflicted on Austria? What was now the extent of Napoleon's power and glory ? What injustice did he commit, and what persecution did he exercise against the Pope ? 458 How unfairly did he act towards the Spaniards ? How was the Spanish ter- ritory invaded by the French and defended by the inhabitants ? Who was the general that most contributed to drive the French from Portu- gal and Spain ? 459 What formidable host did Napoleon lead against Russia ? Wliat plan of defence was adopted by the Russians ? What losses and disasters did the French army experience ? What league was now formed against Napoleon? How did he oppose it? What victories did he gain in Saxony, and how was he in the end entirely defeated? 4G0 When and with wliat views did the allied sovereigns invade France ? How did they enter Paris, and settle the French government? 4G1 What events immediately followed the conclusion of peace ? How did Napo- leon return from Elba ? What declaration was issued against him by the European potentates ? What wei-e his own exertions and the plans of his campaign ? How was the battle of Waterloo fought ? 462 What decisive operations followed the battle of Waterloo ? What became of Napoleon ? How did he close his life ? SECOND AMERICAN WAR. 463 What gave rise to the second American war? What were the fruitless attempts of the Americans upon Canada, and how did they recover their losses ? 464 What was their success at sea ? Where was the British general Ross victorious, and where was he defeated ? • What city was now attacked by the English? How did General Jackson provide for the safety of New Orleans ? What battle was fought, and what victory won by tho Americans ? 463 What was the conclusion of the war? VIEW OP THE CIVILIZED WORLD. What was, for a considerable time, the general state of the civilized nations, after the battle of Waterloo ? What remarkable exertions were made by Great Britain for different objects ? 466 What important events took place in France ? What was the condition of Austria, Russia, Prussia, and Spain ? When did most of the Spanish colonies assert their independence? In what state of national prosperity were the United States in 1844, and what was tfaeir prospect for the future ? 51 36 QUESTION S ANNEXATION OF TEXAS, &C. 467 What events occurred towards the middle of the 19th century ? What were the feelings and protests of the Mexicans at the news of the annexation of Texas ? How did the Americans prepare for the approaching war? What was the result of the first encounters? 468 What were the first exploits of Gen. Taylor? • How did he gain the victory of Re- saca de la Palm a? How did he personally behave in the various engagements ? 469 What, in the meantime, had taken place at Matamoras ? What new steps was taken by the successful Americans? What were the fortifications and means of defence of Monterey ? How was the siege of that city con- ducted ? What led the two parties to come to an agreement about the capitula- tion of Monterey? 470 By what series of new advantages was the surrender of Monterey followed ? How, and by whom, had the con- quest of California been achieved ? What was now the respective situa- tion of the Americans and Mexi- cans ? How was the battle of Buena Vista conducted? 471 How sad was the result of the battle for the Mexicans, and how advan- tageous to the Americans? Who Was now appointed comman- der-in-chief by the American gov- ernment? With what success did General Scott attack the city of Vera Cruz ? 472 What obstacle did he meet in his advance against Mexico ? How were the hei,^hts of Cerro Gordo carried by the Americans ? What were the results of their vic- tory? 473 What cities were successively occu- pied by them ? What was the rapidity of their eon- quests ? What reason induced General Scott to stay for a time in Puebla? What battles were fought in his far- ther advance towards Mexico ? By what means and what series of new efforts was Mexico at length taken ? 474 What treaty put an end to the Mexi- can war ? What losses and what acquisitions accrued from this war to the Ame- ricans ? What took place in the newly ac- quired possessions ? 475 What was the reward of Generals Taylor and Scott? DISTUEBANCES IN EUROPE. 475 What was towards 1848 the political situation of Europe ? When and how was the government of king Louis Philip overthrown ? 476 What new form of government was adopted in France? What were the further views of the socialists ? What awful insurrection broke out in Paris? Who was elected President of the French Republic ? What were, at the same time, the dis- turbances of the Austrian empire ? 477 How was the insurrection in Hun- gary quelled? What vicissitudes of events occur- red in northern Italy ? Under what circumstances were hos- tilities renewed between the Aus- trians and Sardinians ? By what masterly movement did Marshal Radetski defeat king Charles Albert? 478 How were the Sardinians again de- feated near Novara ? What glory did Radetslii acquire in this campaign ? What treaty was concluded between the two states ? With what vigor and success were the insurrections in southern Italy suppressed ? What was the peculiar situation ol Rome and of Pope Pius IX ? 479 What acts of vigor did the Pope in his exile ? How was an end put to the Roman revolution ? What act of policy did the President of the French Republic resort to inlS51? What was the result of it ? 480 What war broke out in the year 1853 ? What powers espoused the cause of the Turkish sultan? To what strong city did the allies re- solve to lay siege ? What victory opened the way to Se- bastopol? What difficulties were met with by the besiegers? CRIMEAN WAR. 481 What was the conduct of the Rus- sian commander after the storm- ing of the Malak off tower? What led to the treaty of Paris ? • To what conditions did Russia sub- rait? Will Russia ever be able to act again against Turkey ? ON MODERN HISTORY. at WAR AND REVOLUTIONS IX ITALV. 482 Was tne influence of Austria great in Italy before the year 1859? What project did Victor Emmanuel conceive with regard to Italy? What were his moans of success? What prince came to his succor, as soon as his dominions had been invaded Ijy the Austrians ? What two defeats were inflicted upon the Austrians ? Describe the battle of Solferino? What reasons induced the victori- ous powers to come to a speedy arrangement with their enemy? 483 What was the principal clause of the two treaties of Villafranea and Zu- rich? What did France receive afterwards from the King of Piedmont? When did tlic revolutionary move- ments begin in Italy? To what causes should they be chief- ly ascril>ed? What provinces did Victor Emman- uel unite to his kingdom in March. ISGO? What was then the conduct of the Pope? What general undertook to form an army for the Pope? What was the fate of the pontifical volunteers; of Ancona; the Marclies and Umbria? 484 Who caused the revolution to tri- umph, first in Sicily, and then in the continental possessions of Francis II? Who came to the succor of Garibal- di, when he was in the Kingdom of Naples? Who captured Gaeta ? What event happened soon after the surrender of tnat city ? What is the present capital of the Kmgdom of Italy? What is the desire of the Italian revolutionists ami the hope of the catholics with regard to Rome? EUROPEAN EXPEDITIONS TO CHINA, COCUIX-CHIXA AND MEXICO. 484 What powers undertook an expedi- tion against China in 1857? What was the result of it? 485 What city did they capture in a sec- ond expedition, and what new ad- vantages did they obtain? What powers undertook aii expedi- tion against the emperor of An- nam in 1858? What were the first results of it ? When and by whom warf it resumed afterwards? By what treaty was it terminated? With whom was Spain at war in 1860? Say what liad taken place in Mexi- co after the war with the United States ? Who was then raised to the Presi- dencj' in 18(jl ? What was the conduct of Juarez with regard to the church and to the European governments? Which, among tlie latter, resolved to to act against him ? 486 What were the intentions of Napo- leon III with regard to Mexico? What was the success of his troops In that country ? What was the resolution of the As- sembly of Notables, convened in the city of Mexico, in 18C>3? What prince did they choose for emperor ? When did Maximilian arrive at Mexico, and wliat were tlien his hopes of success ? Have these hopes been realized? Why not ? What was the fate of Maximilian ? CIVIL WAR IN THE UNITED STATES. 48G What was the cause of the civil war in the United States? When had political agitation with re- gard to slavery begun? 487 Wlien did the pro-slavery party re- solve actually to secede from the Union ? Mention the thirteen seceding States? Whom did they choose for the Pre- sident of the Confederacy ? When and how was the signal of war given ? What feelings arose in the North upon hearing of the attack of Fort Sumter, and what measure was im- mediately taken by President Lin- coln? What battle was fought on the 21st of Juh', 18G1? 489 Say what immense preparations for war the Northerners were thereby induced to jnake, and also what preparations were made bv the Southerners ? What is said of the capture of Fort Donelson ? What happened at Pittsburg Land- ing ? What did the country learn a few days after that bloodv battle? Why did General McClellan land his army at Fortress Monroe ? What first obstacle did he meet with on his route ? What induced him to change hia base of opei'ations ? Witii wliat circumstances was this movement accompanied ? Why did the Confederates conceive in 1^ in i> E 1? ' s Ancient and Modern Histories, Hew, Revised and Enlarpd Editions, Continued up to 1867. Introduced into many of the principal Literary Institutions of thej United States, adopted as Text Books in the Irish University, Dublin, ' Fredet's Histories have acquired a wide spread reputation, and their excellence is too well established, at this day, to be dwelt upon. Tho publishers have the pleasure of announcing that in order to make the Modern History more complete and deserving of the liberal patronage hitherto extended to it, they have, with the valuable assistance of the Jate Dr. Fredet's reverend collaborators, added several Chapters embracing the Historical Events that have taken place in this and other countries, from 1854 to 1867. This edition of tho Modern History has been thoroughly revised|' and considerably enlarged. The additional matter., carefully pre- pared, will be found worthy of the distinguished Historian's original work. The history of the Recent Civil War in the United States, particularly, has been compiled with a truthful impartiality whichJ, m^kes it the best Synopsis of this Memorable Event, yet published for the use of Educational Institutions. It is a correct) record of facts, faithfully told without political comment. The student will therefore find in Dr. Fredet's two books, t4ie "Ancient" and "Modern" Histories, the most Complete, Authentic and Reliable History of the World, from its Creation to the Year of our Lord, 1867. In Press, Preparing for Early Publication, A New History of the Church, for Schools.|j An Abridged History of the Church, in whieh is Narrated her Combats, and her Victories in Times of Persecution and Scandal, and wherein is shown that her Preservation is a Divine work. PoR the use of Schools. Translated from the French of UHomond. By PvEY. Theodore Noethen, author of "History of tho Bible," "Good Thoughts, or Daily Meditations," &c., &c. MURPHY & CO., Publishers and Booksellers, Baltimore." StaiKiavcl School Books, Published byMURPHY&CO., Baltimore. FREDBT'S ITNIVEMSAL HISTORIES. New, Enlarged and Improved Editiom, carcfuUt/ Revised and Corrected, up to 1SG7. J8S^Prof. Fredefs Histories have been adopted a's Text Books ia the Irish University. />u6;;«. These two volumes form a Complete Course of History, or a continuous chain of Historical Events, from the Cueatio.v of the World to the Year, 1S37. The distinguished and wide-spread reputation of the author as an Historian and Pro- fessor of History in St. Mary's College for t-.ycnty years, the universal favor with which these works havebeen received, and their immediate introduction into many of the principal Literary Institutions of the United States, and as Text Books in the Irish Uuiversitv, Dub- lin, preclude the necessity of giving only a few of the numerous complimentary and flattering testimonials that have been so freely extended to them, both in this country and in England where they are extensively used. .^The present Editions have been i Jr p r ov e d, by the addition of Que s t i ons, at the end of each volume; thus rendering them still better adapted to the requirements of the Class Room. ANCIENT HISTORY,' from the dispersion of the Sous of Noe, to the Battle of A.ctium, and the change of the Roman JRe- pxiblic into an Empire. By Pjjter Fredet, D. D., Professor of Hi.story in St. Mfiry's College, Baltimore. 17th edition earefuliy revised and enlarged 12o. half arabesque. 1 50 MODERN HISTORY; from the coming of Christf and the change of the Roman Republie into an Empire, to the Year of our Eord, 18G7. By Peter Frebet, D. D., Professor of History in St. Mary's College, Baltimore. 22d revised, enlarged and improved edition 12o. half arabesque. 1 50 The publishers have the pleasure of announcing that they have just issued new, revised, enlarged, improved and uniform editions of the above works. Each volume contains up- wards of 500 pages, and may justly be considered the most authentic histories published. The Lonrfon S'nndard says: "These two excellent manuals of History have a wide And inert asing circulation in AmLTica, and are everywhere held in the highest esteem. The compiler. Dr. Fredet, has achieved a task of no ordinary difficulty, in compressing so much recondite matter into so small a space ; in leaving untold nothing that was of note ol the immense and varied annals of the world. No college, school, or library ought to be without these excellent works." Tha Duhlhi TeJeg-oph says: "Fredefs Histories havebeen adopted, as a class-book, by the Irish Catholic University; and we entertain no doubt, thatthev will soon supersedo, even in other establishments, those miserable compilations wliieh wilful perverters of truth have lung[rilmed upon the public— both Catholic and Protestant— as histories and abridt'- ments of histories."' "' .The Dubliyi Tahlftscixs: "These two volumes are plain, copious, and useful summaries of history, and the uumber of editions through which they have passed attest then- popularity." The Philadolphia Tnftructor s'ays: "We hope these Histories will soon find their way into every literary institution among us, in order that the young mav loarn the past from pure and uucorrupted sources." Tlie Bvffilf) Sentiml eays: These beautiful treatises are quite deserving of the patronage which tliey obtain. They are most ci.niincndahlc for their Christian and unbiassed pjirit. And we are not astonished that Dr. Fredet has his name taken up by the Irish University, proud that America has made therein such an inroad upon the abridged histories heretofora existing,' The Metropolitan says: "The style is veritably charming by its simplicity, and by the quiet love of his subject which the reverend author displa^^s. It is the language of a talented and successful teacher, who relates to his class the great events of time, succinctly but graphically, without bombast, yet ia a lively and picturesque manner. It is thus that history ahould te written for youth. MURPHY & CO., Publishers and Bookse ers, Baltimore. KBBNBY'S COMPENBIV31 Of Ancient and Modern History. HeWj Revised and Ealarj ed Edition, Continued up to 1867. In presentiug a Revised and Enlarged Edition of this Popular History to the public, the publishers deem it unnecessary to dwell upon its merits; extensively introduced into the Schools of this Coun- try and in many Institutions of Learning in England and Ireland, and even in the East Indies, it has met everywhere with the greatest favor, and twenty-nine editions rapidly exhausted are evidence of the liberal patronage extended to this sterling work. The Compendium has been brought down to the Present Time, and this Edition comprises all the Important Events that have transpired in Europe since the Crimean War, including the Recent War between Austria and Prussia; the History of the Ephemereal Empire of Mexico; and a Graphic Sketch of the American Civil War, vjritien xoiihout partiality or bias. The data for this Last, and Important Chapter, have been carefully compiled from the most authentic sources, and form the best Na rrative of the Principal Events of the War, that can be put into the hands of the young. These additions have been carefully prepared, and written in con- formity with the spirit of impartiality which has made Mr. Kerney's books so popular. The typographical execution of the whole book has been carefully revised, and no ell«rt spared to make the Compendium worthy of the high reputation and libeual patronage it has heretofore enjoyed. ^^^ The foregoing, together wit'h Kerney's First Class Book of His- tory; Kerney's Catechism of Scripture History; Lingard's His- tory of En^gland, abridged, by Burke, ivith Kerney's Notes, &c., are recoiiimended to the especial attention of Teachers. A NEW k COMPLETE SYSTEM of PENMANSHIP, TVoll 'wortliy tlie attention of" Teacliors. Gillespie's Progressive System of Penmanship, la G Numbers, with Steel Plate Copies at the Head of each Page. Price, per Number, 18 ets per Dozen, Sl-50. This pystem is designed to lead the pupils from the first principles in Pen- mansiiip lo fi free, open, practical style of writing, adapted to general busi- ness purposes. Having purchased the Plates and Copy Right of this Series of Copt Booes, we respectfully solicit for them a careful examination, which is all that is necessary to prove the superiority, utility, and economy of this system. Plain Copy Books — Compositiox Books — Writing Papers, Cap, Letter and Note — Globes — Writing Ink and Ink Powders — Steel Pens — Slates — Slate Pencils — Lead Pencils — Pen Holders, Ac. School and Classical Jiooks, Paper, Statioiicry , &c. — A large and well selected stock, comprising every variety, constantly on sale,, at lowest prices. jg@=-ORDERS, which will receive the same care and attention as if selected in person, are respectfully solicited. MURPHY &; CO., Publishers and Booksellers, Baltimore. . STAXDARD SCHOOL BOOKS, Published by MURPHY &. CO., Baltimore. jJ^A liberal discouut to Dooksellers, Teachers, &c., when purchased in quantities. KERNEY'S POPULAR SCHOOL BOOKS. In calling attention to Mr. Kerney's Histories, it is deemed unnecessary to enlarge oa their respective merits. Theauihor's experience as ateac^her for a numberof years, enable:! him to acquire a practical knowledge of the wants of pupils in pursuing the diETercnt; branches of learning. The very liberal patronage extended to them, aud the favor with ■which they have been received, especially by many practical Teaoher.i, and their immediate introduction into many, of the principal institutions of learning in this country, and evca in England, Ireland, and the East Indies, where the Compendium of History has been ex- tensively introduced, are the best evLdeuces of ihcir merits. yl Cotnpendiuni of ^Inclenf and 3£odcrn Historij, from the Crea- tion to tlie jear 18j7, wich QvESTio.va, adapted to the use of Schools and Acade- mies; also an ArrEXDix, containing the Declaration of Independence, the Consti- tntion of tlie United States, a Biographical Sketch of Eminent Personages, with a "Chronological Table of Remarkable Events, Discoveries, Improvements, etc. By M. J. Kkunet, A. M. SOth revised Edition 12o. hf. arabesque, 1 23 RECOMMENDATIONS. The Compendium of History, by M. J. Keruey, has been in my possession several months, and, after a careful reading, I believe it to be a very useful book in the depannieut of study to which it belongs. I take pleasure in recommeuding it "to teachers. J. N. M'JILTOX, Chairman Central nigh School of Baltimore. I have carefully examined "Kernel's Compendium of UUtory," ani " Kcrney's Abridgment n_^ Ifurrai/'s English Grammar." I have the pleasure to infoim you th?t they have both boeu intro- duced into the Public Schools in our citv. I take great pleasure in recommendiug them to the atten- tion of Teachers. J. "f. C.VLLAX, Trustee Public School 2d.,'«'ashingtoa, D.C. " Kerney's Compendium, of Wstortj" condenses much matter in a siraU compass ; and. as a schccl book, is calculated to interest and please the student; while it niiikes him master of the principal and most important facts of Ancient and Modern History. To gpe;ik of its merits comparatively, I think it equal, if not superior, to any of its kind within my knowledge. JOS. H. CLARK, A.M. Having carefully perused the " Cotnpendium of Aneient and Modern Bistory," by M. J. Kerney, I feel no hesitation in staling it to be, in my opiuiou, cue of the best arranged works for the use of cehools and academies that I have seen. JA.MES SHAXIAY, 59 Conway street. Bait. EXTRACTS FROM KOTIGES OF THE PRESS... " Our leisure has not served us to enter into a very ciitical examination of Mr. Kerney's volume ; we have looked through it wiih some attention, and r.iust^ confess that we ha^."* been favoraWy im- pressed with its merits. lu the Histor.v, more especially, whore it is impossible to avoid the relation of facts touching various religious creeds, the compiler seems to have scrupulously refrained from an.v remark that could arouse sectarian prejudice — a fault in which too many of those who have given their labors to the compilation of school histories have been prone to indulge." Kational Intelligencer, " This very useful work was compiled for the use of schools and academies, and fully meets the wants it was intended to supply ; we therefore shall not only adopt it in the schools under our own care, but recommend it as much as we can to others." PiUshiirg Catholic. "WTe confess ourselves well pleased with this volume, and believe it is destined to find favor in tho sphere fcr which the author has designed it. Its style is di.lactic and terse, and while agreeable to the cultivated intellect is adapted to the humblest comprehension. There is one characteristic of the work which pleases ks above all others, and that is tho studied care with which the author avoids all allusions and comments that might be in the siightct degree wounding to the roligioui sensibilities of members of any creed. This is a great desideratum in books designed for schools, as the evil of sectarianism, so manifest in most of our elementary class books, has been long and loudly complained of. VTc cannot but hope that this work will be acceptable to our citizens, becauso of its fitness for the objects for which the author designed it. because of its impartial character, aud because it is the production of a worthy and intelligent member of our own community." U. S. Cjtliolic Magazinv. " It is a work containing much useful information, and, as a school book, and for general historicaJ refsrence, it will be found invaluable." BaL'imore American. " A cursory examination of this volume has led ns to form a vtry favorable opinion of its merits as a school book." Catholic Heraid. " We noticed some months ago the first edition of this work, and are mt'ch gratified to find, frov.i the speedy appearance of the second, that our anticipations of its complete success were not vain. We not only cheerfully, but earnestly recommend it to the favorat>le notice of tutors and directors of ichools and academies." St. L,ouia Xews-Letter. " As an elementary treatise, this work will, we should "u.ip^se, be, »nd ■'eservedly so, i. favorite »» our schools. The aiipendix of biographical notices of promin-'nt individuals is an o-.'^ins.! ami dt> firable addition to the book." Lut'txiran Obse.'ver. " It fills a place long vacant in our school books. Its stylt is good, plnln, und easy ; 't is v«l' ow* tensed, and the narrative correct and justly sustained." iV«(. Smmn MURPHY &i. CO., Publishers and BooksLcllers, Baltimore. Murphy & Co.'s Standard Sehool Books. The First Class JSooJc of ILlstory, designed for pupils commencing the Study of History; with Qukstiovs, adapted to tho use of Acadataics and Schools. By M. J. Kekney, A. M. 2l3t revised edition, 1866 3-'> ' At the earnest request of many tvIio used the author's Compendium of Ancient and Modern History he compiled the above -n-ork. It is chiefly designed for pupils about to enter upon a course of his torical study. In the arrangement of the work, and in the general matter of contents, the authoi &as pursued that course which his long experience in teaching has pointed out as the beat to facili tate the progress of the pupil in acquiring a knowledge of history. As the history of our own country possesses peculiar attractions, he has placed the history of lh« United States first in the order of arrangement, so that it may first claim the attention of the . young. This is succeeded by an interesting account of the most important events in the history of England, France, Ireland, and Italy, together with an interesting view of the Middle Ages, the Crusades, and Monastic Institutions. The work is embellished with a number of Engravings, and has questions at the bottom of eacl page to facilitate the labor both of the teacher and pupils. A Catechism of Scripture History, compiled by the Sisters of Mercy for the use of the children attending their schools. Eevised and corrected by M. J. Kerxey, a. M. ISth American, from the last Loudon Edition .... 18mo, hf. cloth 75 " The preface to this work informs us that it was originally compiled for the use of the pupils attending the schools of the Sisters of Mercy in the city of Limerick, Ireland. It has been revised by Mr. XI, J. Kerney, and a valuable appendix added, containing some pages of extracts from the prophets, with the evidence from the New Testament of the fulfihuent of the predictions given, placed in juxtaposition with the prophetic sentences. It is an admirable book for schools, and cal- culated to give a far more vivid and lasting knowledge of sacred history than could be obtained from years of desultory and mechanical ' Bible-reading.' " Detroit Vindicator. " This excellent work is now used in nearly all Catholic institutions throughout Engl.ind and Ire- land, and has also acquired an extensive circulation throughout the neighboring republic. " 'The object of the Catechism, according to the preface 'is to render cBildren eai-ly acquainted with the truthful and interesting events recorded in the sacred Scriptures; to familiarize then with the prophecies relating to the coming of the Messiah, and lead them to regard the Old Testa- ment, as a figure and a foreshadowing of the New.' " The present edition has been much improved, the questions to the answers being made more concise, so as to admit of their being easily committed to memory. An appendix has also been added, containing extracts from the Prophets, Scripture texts, and s-hon sketches of the lives of the Apostles and Evangelists. The Chronological Table, which has been carefully revised and con siderably enlarged, fixes the dates of the most remarkable events recorded in the Sacred A^'ritings. '" 'We hope soon to see the work introduced into all Catholic Schools in the British Provinces, and were its merits fully known we are pretty certain it would meet with a circulation similar to that which it has acquired in England and the United States." Halifax Catholic. '"Tiiis little school-book, compiled by the Sisters of Mercy, and revised by M. J. Kerney, fills a want which has existed too long. The importance of an exact history of the principal events related In the Bible, is one which all will acknowledge, and the friends of Catholic education are under spe- cial obligations to the compilers, as also to the reviser and publisher of this work." South. JovrnaJ " Of the merits of the book itself, it would be superfluous to speak, but we may observe that tn« /abors of the American editor have added very considerably to its value." Meiropolitmi, Catechism of Ecclesiastical History, abridged for the use of ' Scliools. Translated from the French by a Friend of Youth. A New Enlarged Edition IGino, flexible clotli 19 Tliis little work has been carefully revised and enlarged, the text being brought down to Tne present time. These improvements it is hoped will render it stiil more popular witli| the instructors of j-outh. MeSherry^s History of Mary land, from its Settlement in IGol t<3 tho Yeat- 1848, with Questions, cfco. for tlie .ise of Scliools. By James McShekry, Esq., of the Maryland Bar , 1 00 This work has been introduced into the Public Schools cf Baltimore, aud is strongly recommended by the Commissioners. A NEW SPELLING BOOE:. The North Americayi Spelling Book, designed for Elementarj Introduction in Schools. A New Enlarged Edition, being an improvement upon .ill others ; IS cts .per doz. 1 ft The aim iu tliis compilation has been to present a gradation of lessons necessar}' Impart a knowledge of tlio spelling, division, pronunciation, and accentuation of the xa- rious sounds and s^'llables that compose the English language. In pronouncing and accenting words, good usage and the best lexicographers have been followed. The rules laid down a.^e few, but simple and concise ; and the progress fvom what is easy to what is diffi- cult, is gonMe a:ridi gradual. It is universally conceded to be one of the best, as it is unque*- tionably tte CHBAiKST Spelling Book published. MURPHY Si CO., Publishers and Booksellers, Baltimore. y SCHOOL EDITION of LINGABD'S ENGLAND, A neat volume of nearly 100 pages 12mo., only $1 50. Abrld{jcment of the History of England. By Joux Lingard, D. D. With a Continuation from 168S to the Reign of Queen Viotoria. By James Burke, Esq. To which are added, Marginal Notes and Questions, adapted to the use of Schools, by M. J. Kerncy, A. M. Seveutli edition. The student will find that the ipa'issima verba of the great Catholic Historian of England has been religiously preserved in the Abridgement. Of tlie Continuation we shall merely say, that it has been written by an author who has been long and favorably known in literature. The Metropolitan, in noticing this work, says : — "We are glad to see this excellent abridgment adapted to the use of schools. It will do much to remove those many false impressions, which English hi-^toriaris have hitherto made upon the readers of history by their word-painting of iranginary events. In no nation perliaps was his- tory more "a conspiracy agaui:-t truth," lh;iii in that of England, and in none did the mind of American youth need a more particular antidote to its poisoning influence. It was a uood thought then to give a sound, reliable first-book to the youthful student, and we are happy to find that Mr. Burke and his able American collaborator, have succeeded in producing a text-book which we can with llie utmost confidence com- mend to the favorable consideration of the instructors of ^outh." The Cambridge (Mass) Chronicle says : — " We iiave often called the attention of our readers to the great value of Lingard's History. The learning, ability, and gen- eral iiapartiahty of the author are well known. An abridgment of the work was very desirable, and it appears to have been very well done by the present editor. No person can said to be thoroughly acquainted with English History who is not familiar wiih Lingard. The volume is well i)rinted, in a clear type and convenient form, and furnishes a valuable contribution to the iiistorical lileroture of the country." The Catholic Instructor says :— " .Vlurphy & Co., of BaltimorCj have, with their usual enterprise, got up a school edition of the abridged " History of England," by the renowned Dr. Lingard. This work was greatly needed, and we trust that it will at once be introduced into all our colleges and schools. Histories of England are not so scarce as they are iuifair. Most of them abound with false statements and dis torted fai^ls. Dr. Lingard is regarded as the most correct, hn partial, aad truthful his torian of England." The Dublin Review says :— " Mr. Burke's Abridgment is completely successful- We do not hesitate to pronounce the work as a whole, one of the most valuable ad- ditions to our scanty school literature which we have met with for many years.-' The London edition of Brownson''s Review says :— " Mr. Burke appears to have entered on his task with an enthusiasm equal to the ability which he has displayed in executing it. He has formed a Manual of British History, not merely the best for the object aimed at— the mstruction of youth— but a volume of safe reference to those of riper years." The Dublin Freeman's Jour7ial says:— " Mr. Burke has performed his laborious task well, compressing into a comparatively small sp.acc, the substance of such a large work in 'the author's own language, adding a clear and rapid abstract of the national history down to the present year." The London Lamp says :— " We thank Mr. Burke for the admirable manner in which he has accomplished his very difficult task of abridging the writings of Dr. Lingard, and we congratulate him on his vakiable Continuation." Tlie Dublin Evening Post says :—" This Ahridgnjent has been prepared for the use of schools, and while serving this purpose to perfection, it will do more, and persons who have long passed their school days may readily profit by the condensed information which it contains." The Hull Advertiser says :— " Raving compared the Abridgment with the large work, we can testify that iMr. Burke has performed the task undertaken by him with great skill, and the constant exercise of a sound judgment." The London Critic says :— " The author has carefully and successfully produced a volume that must be very acceptable lo those for whose use it was designed." The London Hami/cr says :—" Mr. Burke has done his work well, and the result is verv satisfactorv." ' ,.../.. i w The Dublin Tablet saj's :— " A Catholic History of England suitable for schools has ong been a desideratum. The present volume supplies that want which has been s« nuch und so constantlv lamented." MURPHY & CO., Pubiithers and Bookseilers, Baltimore. Murphy & Co.'s Standard School Books. SESTIJSri'S 3IATHEMATICAL WORKS, El^inetitary Algebra. By B. Sestini, S. J., author of Analytical Geom- etry, &c. &c. Professor of Natural Philosophy aud Astronomy in George- town College 12o. half arabesque. 75 The main object of this treatise is to render the science of Algebra intelligible to pnpils whoM minds are jet unaccustomed to such studies. The beginn» will here be furnished with such proofi as are suited to his capacity; examples will afford new light to what might be otherwise obscure with regard to the operations founded on higher principles, he will, for the present, content himself with merely practical rules,''exemplified in the same manner. With a mind thus gradually led on t4 strict mathematical discussion, he may then resume his course with profit, by the aid of a treatise n )w in preparation, which is intended as a sequel to this, and, by more exact and thorough investi- eation, complete his study of Algebra. BRIEF EXTRACTS FROM NOTICES OF THE PRKSS. " This work recommends itself to favor by the admirable order of its parts, and the conciseness and clearness with which its principles aro expounded. One needs but open the took to perceive that the author Ifas brought to the execution of his task a ripened judgment and well-tried experience. He is not a compiler — his work has the rare merit of originality, and every student of Algebra will thank him for having given in a few pages what has usually occupied a large volume, and fo'r hav- ing rendered intelligible what-tas often proved an enigma to many." Mclropolilan. " This book might very properly be called " Algebra without a master." One very important im- provement that the author has made upon all our text-books, and which deserves to be mentioned, is this, that he keeps monomials and polynomials distinct, aud explains and applies to them separately the various rules as laid down in his Algebra. The work only wants to be known, in order to be oniversally approved." Western Tablet. " AVe feel much pleasure in recommending it as containing nearly all necessary to be known on the subject of which it treats. It is eminentl3' adapted for the use of young persons who wish to ac- quire a knowledge of the ditficult science of Algebra." Halifax Catholic. " To persons commencing the study of Algebra, we cheerfully recommend Mr. Sestini's work, as one well calculated to smooth the difficulties which beginners have to overcome in their first attempt* to master that science." I'ittshufg Catholic. " As a rudnnental book it will be found eminently useful in schools and colleges." Det. Vindicutor. " The author is well known as a man of great ability, aud his work cannot fail to be of good ser vice in schools." Buffalo Sentinel. ^i Treatise on Algebra, by B. Sestiki, S. J., author of ** Elemen- tary Algebra," " Analytical Geometry," &c 12mo 1 00 " We h ivc hid occis'nii before to speak of the works of Professor Sestini, and the commendation we then beslowej upon them we hive ni hesitation in ri"pe Ung now on tliis new work, which Ins issued from hii in iefiti^ible psn. The best praise, t.owever, in these ma'lers, ineiry and Trigonometry, by B. Sestini, S. J., author of "Analytical Geometry," "Elementary Algebra," &e 8ro. 150 " VVe have examined this new work of Professor Seslmi with care, and are much gratified to be able to say that we consider it a most valuable addition to the elementary literature of mathematics. The style of the author is clear, his method at once brief aud rirorously exact, and his explanations and statementt remarkiblv perspicuous. The adoption of Algebraic notation from the very beginning, is a great economy of space and time, presenting to the "iye, immt-diattly, that which in the common method requires a lone and ledloue periphrasis. Besiies, it is an excellent methol of training the stuJeut for the higher branches of mathematical discussion in which this form of demonstration is essential. We cannot too highly recom- mend the work, and must say th't though there may be no royal road to Geometry, 'his comes nearer to that easy route than any book we hive seen." ^ Baltimore Patriot. •' The author has succeeded in combining two quaJ'.t'es rarely united, great perspicuity and extreme cf>a ciseness. It has evidently been the result of great thought and long experience in teaching. The studen passes gradually from the simpler to the more complex truths of the science. The work cannot be to* warmly commended as an admirable introduction to the science it professes to leach, and we would aJvim ♦eacheis and parents not to select a text-book until they have given this volume a careful and candid ex unination. ' J^etropolitan, MURPHY & Co.', Publishers and Booksellers, Baltimore. Murphy & Co.'s Standard School Books. WettenhalVs Greek Graminar, — Rudiments .of the Greek Language, arranged for the Students of Loyola Col- lege, Baltimore, — upon tte hnsis of Wettenball. Sixth edition 12o., half arabesque. 75 Extract from the Pre/ace—" It is not iatended by this publication to present a new Greek Grammar to the classical student; after the elaborate volumes of Matthiae, Buttmau, Kul>- ner, Gail, Buruouf and other scholars of Germany and France, it would be altogether vain to expect any new discovery in that language. The most that we can do is to avail ourselves of their labours in order to smooth tlte ditlicalties, which are usually met in its study. The greatest of these we have learned from a long experience in teaching, is the large size of the grammars, whicli are put in the studenfs hands, when he commences. Excellent as these may be for the professor or more advanced scholar, they only tend to deler the begin- ner from approaching it. We trust that this will be obviated by the present compendium, in which we have endeavoured to comprise within as short a compass as possible, all that ia of absolute necessity to the learner. If it induce him to apply with more alacrity to study a language, second to none in the literary beauties and treasures which it contains, our in- tentions will have been amply fulfilled." "This is a handy little introduction to the study of Greek. Our school-boy experience remeuiljers well the dismay with which we took up the otherwise excellent grammar of Gloucester, old Ironsides we called it, and it well deserved the name for the batteriuga it re- ceived from our violence. But Ironsides was an epitome, when put in competition witli tho Greek Rudiments tliat succeeded it in school, and often when we were allowed to see "VVet- tenhall, we hoped some good angel would put it into the heads of our masters to use his nice httle volume in preference to all others. We knew not then how valuable iu other re- spects for its purpose Wettenhall's was, but since we have been better able to understand the aptness of a book for tho purpose of education, we are astonished how any one could ever have thought of giving up its comprehensive brevity, where there was very little super- fluous, for the larger and more elaborate grammars, whieh since have frightened so many scholars away from classical studies. The advantage of this edition seems to be in the re- moval of some few superfluities, which yec remained. We" commend it most heartily to those who wish tostudy that most perfect of all human languages, as the shortest and rea- diest way to smoothe all their difficulties." — Metropolitan. "This work is intended for the use of beginners, and appears to comprise within a very small .space, all that is absolutely necessary to the learner. Wo think it is eminently calcu- lated to lighten the labours of the teacher, and smooth the way of the student. We com- mend it to professors and teachers tliroughout the Province." — Toronto Citizen. The Baltimore Patriot says: — "The volume before us is a compact treatise upon the grammar of the Greek langu.age, and supplies the student with all the grammatical knowledge ho requires in order to begin the study of the Greek classics. It contains not ■mly the necessary information on the subject of etymology and syntax, but also a suflicient account of the dialects, and a chapter on the digamma. It is emphatically multum in parvo.'' It.udcli;n.aii\'i T^atin Grammar. — Kuddimans Rudkncnts of the Latin 'Ti)nf/Hf ; or, a Plain and Easy Introduction to ]yatin Grammars wherein tho prin- cipk'S of tlie language are methodically digested, both ir the English and J^atiu. "With usef.il Notes and Observations. 30th edition — corrected. and improved. By William Ma.nx, M. A I2o, half arabesque. 75 j^^ The. ckeapeat and best Latin Grammar published. Ars JiJietorica—Auctore, R. P., Martino du Cygne, Societatis Jesu. Editio Secunda Americana. In usum CoUegii Georgeopolitani, S. J. To this New Edition an Appendix, has been added, containing Examples taken from the Eng- lish Classics 18o. half araboaque 75 MURPHY 8i CO., Publishers and Booksellers, Baltimore. Murphy & Co.'s Standard School Books. KEBNEY'S AlilTHMETICS. Tite Columbian JLrithmetic, designed for the use of Academies and Schools. By M. J. Kerney, A. M. 25th improved edition, 18G6 50 The aim has been, in the compilation and arrangement of this work, to make it a book of practical instruction; one in which the science of figures is thoroughly explained and clearly elucidated. The examples for practice are generally such as the pupil will meet ia the various business transactions of life. The arrangement is progressive, all questions being solved by rules previously explained. This new edition has been carefully re- vised and enlarged. Several useful tables on the subject of Interest have been intro- duced, and numerous miscellaneous examples added. These improvements will render the work still more deserving of the extensive patronage it has heretofore enjoyed. Key to Kerney' s Columbian Arithmetic, conioimngihQ solution of tho principal questions, -• ^^ Introduction to the Columbian Arithmetic, designed for the use of Academies and Schools. By M. J. Kerxey, A. M. 30th Revised Edition 20 This little work is designed as an introduction to the former, and is intended for children, aliout to commence the study of Arithmetic. The first principles of the science are familiarly explained in the form of question and answer, and the pupils are conducted in the study as far as the end of compound numbers. It is replete with practical examples, adapted to the capacity of that class of iearuerg for which it is designed, and it also contains all the Tables. Mr. Kerney's Arithmetics have already acquired a wide-spread popularity, as attested by the sale of large editions in a few years. They are books of practical instruction, arranged by a practical teacher of many years experience. The present editions have beea carefully revised, and neither pains nor expense will be spared to render them at all times worthy the high reputation already acquired. The publishers are fully aware of the prejudices existing among many teachers in favor of old works on Arithmetic; hence the great difficulty of introduciug new ones, however meritorious; from such they earnestly solicit a careful examination of these works — and respectfully refer them to the following testimonials of their merits from practical teachers. Alexandria, Va., November 18th, 1849. An examination of the " Columbian Arithmetic," by M. J. Kerney, has convinced us of its sterling ntility, and we shall accordingly make arrangements for its immediate introduction into our school, fnunibering, at present, eighty pupils.) "We believe it to be second to none extant, and would, therefore, recommend it to all teachers of Academies, &c. L. WHITTLESEY & SON. I have examined the " Columbian Arithmetic," and "Introduction" to it, by M. J. Kerney, and consider them excellent books ; they are judiciously arranged, and practical in their applicatiou— The rules are plain, sufficiently concise, and well adapted to the comprehension of young persons. The explanation of the th;;ory of Proportion is simple, perspicuous, and accurate. We iutend to in- troduce those books into our school. JOHN SLATTERY, Principal Washington Seminary, Number of pupils about 300. I have examined with much care the " Columbian Arithmetic," by M. J. Kerney. It appears to me to be a work of considerable merit, and is hetter cnlculated for schools of the United States, and for counting-houses, than any other book on the sulject that I have yet seen. The general ar- rangement is systematic, and according to the affinities of ditlereut rules. Under the impression that it is an improvement upon eoery other worli of the kind now before the public, I will immedi- tttelv adopt it in my school, numbering at present about niuetv pupils. Washinyton, Nov. 13, 18i9. S. 13. RITTENHOUSK, Principal Washington Institute. As an evidence of the high opinion I entertain of the " Columbian Arithmetic," I have superseded the use of -Davies', by its immediate introduction. F. KNIGHTON, Alexandria Jiistitiiie. The " Introduction to the Columbian Arithmetic" is so admirably adapted to its purpose, that we have introduced it in the place of others in this seminary. Number of pupils, over one hundred. McLeod's Seminary, Washington. J. O. WILSON, L. H. CHURCHILL, Associate Principals. I have examined the Arithmetics by M. J. Kerney, and unhesitatingly give them the preference jver all the various works of the kind which I have met with. Mrs. J. McLEOD, Select School. 1 believe that the Columbian series of Arithmetics, by M. J. Kerney, better calculated to assist Ihe pupil in that branch of science, than any other. A. W. HALL, Alexandria, Va. I am much pleased with Kerney's Arithmetics, and think them much better adapted to the use of pupils generally, than any others I have examined. RICHARD L. CARNE, Jk. St. John's Academy, Alexandria, Va., November 11th, 1819. 1 am much pleased with the Aiithmctics by SI. J. Kei-ney, and shall introduce them in my school, believing them to be better calculated to facilitate the progress of the pupil in that branch of leSence, than anv other book on that subject. Georgetoivn, November 13th, 1^9. J. K. COMPTON. T have examined Kerney's " Columbian Arithmetic," and I consider it such a one as has been much wanted in schools. I decidedly prefer it to any heretofore used, and shall introduce it into my school. M. R." SHYNE, Navy Yard Academy, Wasliington. 1 have exaruined the " Introduction to the Columbian Arithmetic," by M.J. Kerney, and hav« adopted it in preference to others. I shall also use the " Columbian Arithmetic" in my more ad »anced classes. Boarding and Day School of the Misses HAWLEY, Washington, D G. I have examined, as far as my leisure would permit, the " Columbian Arithmetic," and am muofe pleased with many features of "the work. I have introduced it into mv school. HENRY E. WOODBURY, Principal Washington Select School; Murphy & Co.'s Standard School Books. Kerney's Murray's Gratn7nar. — An Abridgement of Murray's Gram- mar and ExeixtseK, designed for the iise of Acadeiuiesuiid Soliuols; with au Appeo- dix, containin, Rules for Writing With Perspicuity and Accuracy also a Troatiso on Epistolary Composition. By M. J. Keknet, A. M. 37th edition eularged and improved 18o, hf. bd. 25 This Grammar is vised in the Public Schools of Baltimore ; in the Schools of the Christian Brothers; and in many of the principal Schools and Academies throughout the country. In point of arrangement, this work is superior to any other Abridgment of Murray's Grammai that liHS yet appeared before the public. Itcombines the" Grammar and Exercise, by adapting Exer- cises to eveiy chapter and section tliroughout the work, so that the pupil may have, at every stag* 6f his progress, a practical illustration of the portion under his imuiediiUe study. The present edition has been carefully revised by the author, and many valuable improvements made in th» work. A Treatise on Epistolary Composition has been added, containing directions for writin| Letters, Notes, Cards, &c., with a variety of examples of the same. EXTRACTS FROM NOTICES OF THE PRESS. " Mr. fcrney's Abridgment of it is just what it professes to be, and not a new superstructure upo» an old foundation. Tbose w ho think Murray's the best of all grammars, therefore, will not hesitat, much to think this the best of all abridgments." National Jntclligencer. " This abbreviation of the large and unwieldy volume of the Patriarch of Grammarians has been effected without the omission of any important matter, and is presented to the public in a neat and eonvenieut form. It must find favor in schools." Baltimore Patriot, " M'e most cheerfully recommend this Grammar to schools.' St. Louis A'ms- Letter "This is an excellent abridgment of Murray, long a favorite in schools. Fred. Examiner. " On a cursory examination, it appears to be well adapted to the purposes for which it was designed, tBd worthy to be extensively introduced into schools and academies." Baltimore Clipper. -" We are very much pleased with this abridgment, and think the improvements Mr. Keruev haj made admirably calculated to accelerate the progress of the learner, and to lessen the labor of tha teacher. We feel great pleasure in commending the work to the favorable notice and patronage of teachers of youth." Odd I'cllotcs' Mirror. " This popular little work seems to contend for the palm of usefulness with Mr. Chandler's grammar, which we noticed a few months ago. The Presentation Brothers, who conduct St. Pauls School io Jliis city, and who are good practical judges, as well as excellent teachers, prefer this abridgment, e.specially for the junior classes." Pittsburg Catholic. " This little work appears to be exceedingly well suited to the useof the scholarwho is about enter- ing upon the sturiy of the English language. It will, no doubt, prove an aid to the tutor, and, by Its sinijiUcity and explanatory style, be of great advantage to the pupil." Baltimore American. " The general arrangement of Murray's Grammar is admitted to be the best extant. Mr. Kornejf has presented all that is truly valuable in any abridgment of Murray's that wc have seen, and ha« made several valuable suggestions to instructors. The book cannot fail to meet with success amouj Intelligent teachers." Methodist Protestant. " We take particular pleasure in recommending this abridgment to the public. The notes and ob- servations taken from the original are copious and well selected. In point of arrangement, it is su- perior to any other abridgment of Murray's Grammar. Besides embracing in a narrow compass all that is important or essential in the original grammar and exercise, this abridgmeut contains in i(a Bppendi.\ several additional matters which will be fo\md highly interesting and useful to the Varucr ; such as the Art, of Reasoning, Oratory, Elliptical Phrases, Popular I^atiu Phrases, with a literal English Translation." U. S. Catholic Magazine, MURRAY'S GRAMMAR. Murray^s English Grammar, adapted to the different classes of Ie?.rners, with an Appendix, containing rules and observations for assisting the more ' . ' advanced students to write with perspicuity and accuracy. By Lindlev Muuuav. 12mo, half bound 40 Tn presenting a new edition of Murray's Grammar, which is universally considered the best extant, Tve deem it sufficient to state, that the present edition is printed from an entirely new set of plates, and that it has been carefully revised, and free from many of the inaccuracies and blemishes which Rre to be found in other editions, printed from old stereotype plates. This, together with the very low price affixed to it, are the only claims urged in favor of this edition. Murray^ s English Reader 18mo .35 GERMAN SCHOOL BOOKS. ABC und Buchstabir und Lesebuch 15 Katholischer Katecfiismus 30 Bibhttchc Geschiclite des Alte.n und lieuen Testamentes . . .«. 4a Kleiner Katcchismus, 33mo .3 cts . . . . oer 1 dO. 2 00 jg®"The following Geu.Ma.v Speller and Reader have been carefully prepared by the School Sisters «jf Kotre D.ime, expressly for the German Schools under their charge. Tiiey may j ustly bo considered the best Books of their class for the use of German Primary Schools. Fibel fur die lichen lilemcri, gehraucht in den Scktilen der dcutschen Schul- echwestern unserer lieben Frau 10 Lcs.rhu'hirin fur die lichen Kleinen, gehraucht in den Schulen der dcutschen Schulschwesturn unaerer lieben Frau IS MURPHY & CO., Publishors and Booksellers, Baltimore. LIST OF STANDARD SCHOOL BOOKS, Published by MURPHY 8l CO. 182 Baltimore st, Baltimore. Kerneijs First Class Book of History ^0 35 Vo'inpendiiwiof Ancient & Modern History, new ed. of 18()7, 1 25 Abridgment of Murray^s Grammar and Exercises 25 — ~ Introduction to Oolutnbian Arithmetic 20 Oolu7nbian Aritlnnetic 50 Key to do 40 Murray^ s English Gramm.ar — complete .' , 40 English Reader — ISo „ 35 Catechism of Scripture History, revised by M. J. Kerney, A. M 75 Uatechi-sm of Ecclesiastical History ^ 30 Sestini's Elements of Algebra 75 Treatise on Algebra 1 00 Treatise on Analytical Geometry 1 50 Lingard's History of England, Abridged by Burke. With Notes and Questions, by M. J. Kernej"-, A. M 1 50 Fredefs Modern History, new enlarged edition, up to 1S67... 1 .50 Ancient History, from the Flood, to the Roman Empire, 1 50 McSherry's History of Maryland, from its Settlement, 1034 to 1848 1 00 Bud,diman\s Latin Grammar, (the Cheapest and Best published,) 75 WettenhaWs Greek Grammar — Rudiments of the Greek Language, ar- ranged for the Students of Loyola College, Bait 75 Ars Rhetorica — ^Auetore, R. P. Martino du Cygne, Soc. Jesu Editio Sec. Americana. In Usum Collegii Georgiopohtani, S. J 75 A B C und Buckstabir und Lesebuch , 15 Biblische Geschichte des Alten und Neuen Testajnentcs 40 Katholischer Katcchismus 30 Kleinei Katechismiis 3 Fibelfur die lieben Kleinen, gebraucht in den Schulen der deutschen Schulsch- western unserer lieben Frau ; .^ 10 Lescbuchlein fur die lieben Kleinen, gebraucht in den Schulen der deutschen Schulschwcstern unserer lieben Frau ,..."... 15 Elementos de Sicologio, Elements of Psj^cholop^ 75 The North A^nerican Spelling Book, designed for Elementary Instruc- tion in Schools, — an improvement upon all others .' 18 ;g@=Universally conceded to be the best, and the cheapest Spelling Book published. In Press. — An Abridged History of the Church, for Schools. ■ Gillespie's JPvogressive Systetti of Penmanship, in 6 Numbers, with Steel Plftte Copies at the Head of each Page. §1 50 net per dozen. This New and Complete sj-stem is designed to lead the pupils from the first principles in Penmanship to a free, open, and practical st}le of writing,. adapted to general business purposes, is well worthy the attention of teachers. Irving's Catechisms — Grecian History — Grecian Antiquities— Roman Ant-iqui- ties. Price per doz. 1 35 net. SeJtool and Classical JiooTes, JPaper, Stationery, &c. Tlieir stock of School Books embraces, in addition to their own, nearly all the Publications of the leading Publi3her.s in the United States, comprising every variety Of Primers, Spellers, Readers, Grammars, Arithmetics, Geographies, Histories, Dictionaries, etc.; also. Works on Elocution, Algebra, Geometry, Trigonometry, Astronomy, Botany, Chemistry, Geologj-, and Miner.alogy, Philosophy, Rhetoric, and Logic, Book-keeping, Penmanship,- etc., etc., together with all the leading Text-Books in Latin, Greek, French, Spanish and German— nearly all of which they are prepared to nupply at Publishers' ichole-sah prices. Their Stock of raper, Stationery, and School Mequisites generally, comprises every variety, all of which thej'- are prepared to sell at the lowest current rates. /-r , s^^ Oo 'p ^ ^ ^3^#%\^r ^^ c^. V I %;- <\> -0^ A^' ^'^^V^^ ■^. A A^ Deacidified using the Bookkeeper proces Neutralizing agent: Magnesium Oxide Treatnnent Date; HAY * 2002 PreservationTechnologie A WORLD LEADER IN PAPER PRESERVATIO 111 Thomson Park Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066 \^^^. ,^ ''^ lH -r^f-. > '^^A^v^' ."/ \^^ ^ .0- X^^'"'^^ >' ^c^^ O. =0 C y>> .0* 'CO^ ^^- 't, \' .-^ >>^ % , \ V •^o 0^ .*-" ^*. \^^ A % .#^\ ^^ '^. <^^ ^/ <^0 '^> ,<^^" ^"p v>' 1-^ :^ .^'V'.-'o. -.^' ^\ »0 o V ^' /' J^> .^^ y, . . ^ ^' /^ ■^ 7. "'j:v. - O t' <<> "^^ ' •=! c> ■ -4 ..0^^' > ^0 « V '*' •^ '^'^ O^ •^^ ^ / rp ^^r>N H .\X ^^^ v^^ x^^.. '\^ .0^^ .^\■