SF 385 .042 Copy 1 Angora Goats The Wealth of the Wilderness fwenty-FIve Cents ANGORA GOATS The Wealth of the Wilderness BY GEORGE EDWARD ALLEN " THE STONE WHICH THE BUILDERS REFUSED IS BECOME THE HEADSTONE OF THE CORNER." WELLSBORO, PA., U. S. A. HORACE A. FIELD & COMPANY 1900 Copyright, 1900, by George E, Allen ANGORA GOATS CHAPTER I. Scrub Uplands and Their Utility. Millions of acres of land in the mountain districts of America and along the great lakes are overgrown with brush and weeds. For ordinary industrial purposes they are worth- less. A permanent revenue of even a few cents an acre from this vast territory would add millions, if not billions, to the wealth of the country. A cent a year from a piece of land as large as a city lot does not seem like much money, but on a val- uation of a dollar an acre, which is a liberal figure for brush and stumps, it is a greater percentage of profit than is realized from the best improved property in New York City. In building railroads, developing mines, conjuring with elec- tricity and making farming an advanced science, American genius has overlooked primitive opportunities in which nature does most of the necessary work and requires the minimum of capital and experience. The highlands of America are exactly adapted to raising rugged breeds of cattle, sheep and goats, such as inhabit the mountainous regions of the Old World, and con- stitute the most substantial wealth of Scotland, Turkey and South Africa. Every living creature is an evolution of environment. The highlands of Scotland have developed the famous Cheviot and Blackfaced sheep, which thrive where no other domestic ani- mals can live, and the rugged Galloway hills have given their character and name to a breed of cattle unequalled for hardihood and unexecelled for profit. The barren uplands of Turkey in Asia are the home of the Angora goat, which can subsist on the nearest to nothing of any animal useful to man. The climate, soil and vegetation of the mountain and forest districts of Ameri- 4 ANGORA GOATS. ca are seemingly more suitable to these rugged animals than their own native lands, and unlimited opportunities are available for capital and industry. In advocating distinctly highland breeds of live stock for highland districts no reflection is implied upon the masters of breeding who have stocked our cultivated fields and fertile prairies. America has out-Jerseyed jersey and out-Merinoed France and Spain. The methods of the cultivated fields and prairies, however, are not the methods of the mountains, and the animal character of the plains is not the animal character of the highlands. When Uncle Sam had free farms for all comers, with cli- mate and soil to suit individual preferences, animal industry consisted chiefly in rinding proper locations for breeds suffi- ciently profitable to overbalance the expense of special care and feeding. Such locations are now occupied, and in addition to the ordinary profits of stock raising there has been a substantial increase in the value of land thus utilized. Even the Western ranges have attained a recognized worth and are rapidly passing into private ownership. In figuring the financial results of stock raising, interest on the value of land must be allowed and the expense of care and feeding must be taken into account. As land in favored loca- tions increases in price, opportunities previously rejected or overlooked must be utilized. Profits and losses depend upon the capital and expense accounts. The time has come when the stockman must adapt breeds to locations instead of hunting loca- tions for breeds. Under such conditions the reclamation of American highlands is no longer a sentiment. It is a practical business proposition. "The stone which the builders refused has become the headstone of the corner." This ancient adage applies with striking aptness not only to neglected highlands overgrown with brush and weeds, but to the agency which nature has provided for their reclamation. That agency, inexpensive and unfailing, as natural agencies always are, is the goat. Any kind of goat will clear brush land, but as it costs no more to maintain good goats than poor ones, Angoras and grades of this breed are recommended when obtainable on reasonable terms. This idea is of course very simple, as all great things are simple when you ANGORA GOATS. 5 come to understand them. When you consider the square miles and square hundreds of miles of wilderness that may thus be made valuable, the magnitude of the idea grows upon you. Government authorities estimate the amount of unproduc- tive land in the United States at 265,000,000 acres. Relative to areas suitable for goat keeping upon any scale, from a few for milk or cheese to large flocks for their fleeces or skins, it may be confidently asserted that wherever there is a suitable climate there are also suitable uncultivated lands. Over 42 per cent, of the land in farms in the United States is unimproved; how much of it is uncultivable is unknown. The total unimproved land amounts to 265,000,000 acres, against more than 375,600,- 000 improved. This presents a vast field for selection of favored localities in every part of the country . It is true that considerable portions of the unimproved farm land is in valuable forests, which invite preservation as such for various economic reasons; but it is equally true that a large proportion is useless as a present or prospective timber reserve, and can be utilized only in some such way as here suggested. In the aggregate, millions of acres of poor, rough, rocky, or bushy land, distributed through all the States, call for subjugation and enrichment through animal occupation, preferably of the goat, which would not only destroy the growth that invites recurrent conflagrations, but would result ultimately in the introduction of nutritious grasses. The goat is easily adaptable to all countries, and thrives in all climates except that of the polar regions. Evidently, how- ever, it will tend to be most profitable in those localities where the expense of keeping is the least the year round. Hardy, agile, enterprising, it always thrives, if unconfined, in heat or cold, on mountain or plain, but prefers rough, rocky, wild and elevated land. CHAPTER II. Government Investigations. The United States Department of Agriculture, at all times and very properly conservative, has recently and for the first time given serious attention to goat culture. In a bulletin writ- 6 ANGORA GOATS. ten by Almont Barnes of the Division of Statistics, some inter- esting statements are made. Goatskins, from which is derived the greatest amount of the profits of goat keeping in regions where the largest numbers of these animals are usually raised, were in so little demand in the United States prior to 1864 that they were not separately classified for duty on importation, but were included with "hides and skins" of all kinds, except fur, which together were valued that year at $7,505,238, and paid an import duty of 5 per cent, ad valorem. In 1864 goatskins were first separately classified, being valued at $1,799,166, while the imported "hides" were valued at $6,177,512; and this is the start- ing point of their distinct and officially stated invoice value. In 1865, with the duty doubled, importation diminished; but under succeeding demand and rates of duty, or, as now, duty free, up to June 30, 1898, importation had increased in value to $15,- 776,601, and the increase of the fiscal year 1898 over 1897 was 28.2 per cent. The foregoing are, as stated, invoice valuations, that is, those declared as the cost to the shipper at the foreign ports of shipment. For various reasons, as of insurance, handling, freight, commissions, profits to the shipper, etc., they are much below the valuations in our own markets. The average invoice value of desirable skins in 1898 appears to have been 24.3 cents per pound — $15,776,601, the invoice value, being divided by the invoice weight of 64,906,485 pounds. But the average market price (the price to purchasers for home use) of these skins in New York during the year of their importation was about 39.3 cents per pound, or about 62 per cent, higher than the invoice value; so that the gross value of the year's importation, upon the basis of the average price in our home market, and at 62 per cent, above the invoice value, was $25,508,249. This is what the consumers really paid, and it is therefore the real value of the skins imported, rather than that expressed in the invoices. Practically all the goatskins entering into the commerce and manufacture of the United States are imported. With the exception of that portion of the population and its increase mostly upon territory derived from Spain and Mexico, the peo- ple of this country have not usually evinced any interest in goat herding for profit, either of skins or other products. There have been for centuries small herds in the sparsely populated western ANGORA GOATS. 7 territory indicated, and, besides, a not inconsiderable number of goats in the aggregate has been kept for milk in the suburbs of cities. In goat keeping on a large scale it is not alone the skins and fleeces which enter into the account of profit, although these are primary, especially for distant markets. If the skins, which represent over fifteen millions of invoice and twenty-five mil- lions of market value in importations, represented native stock, there would be taken additionally into the home market and possibly profit account nearly the whole animal — the flesh, tal- low, bones, hoofs, horns, and perhaps the intestines and their contents, which together may constitute half or more of the entire marketable value. These specified objects roughly, but perhaps sufficiently, indicate the classes of domesticated goats prevalent in various countries, and inferentially the conditions attending their pre- valence. As the greatest market demand is for skins, the largest herds in various countries are kept to meet that demand, and as the demand relates less to breeding than to abundance, the common goat (that least modified from the native stock) most economically and profitably meets the requirement. Common goats need the least care and require only the cheapest and most primitive pasturage — bushes and weeds. They furnish a prod- uct of world-wide use, not dependent upon any kind of culture for its availability or excellence. Wherever they can be stocked upon unused or otherwise unusable lands, with the rude and slight care required, they are almost gratuitouslv nrofitable. Thus, the price paid for imported goatskins is less representa- tive of cost of production than of the commercial sagacity of the producers and their appreciation of the needs of the market, and suggests an enviable margin of profit. The price above cost paid by consumers of this country is the gratuity paid to foreign producers, importers, etc., because of lack of enterprise, ignorance, or wasteful prejudice. The market price of an article is sensibly affected by nomenclature. In coffees, for instance, an additional price is paid for the names of Mocha and Java, though official statistics show, and facts of production and movement confirm, that not a pound of Mocha coffee has been introduced into this country for at least fifty years, and, com- pared with the supposed consumption, but little of Java for 8 ANGORA GOATS. twenty-five years. So also are paid higher prices for so-called Curacao kid and goat skins and goods, while the arid island of Curacao, not 15 miles long nor 4 miles wide, having but two fresh-water springs and not 5,000 goats, receives its supplies of skins from adjacent parts of Venezuela and Colombia, which make Curacao their foreign shipping port. Common goats are, of course, the most numerous class wherever skins are the principal object sought, and they furnish, besides, the milk and meat required by their owners or keep- ers. Next to these in aggregate number are the goats kept primarily for dairy products, in flocks or singly, over a large part of the world. This class includes select common stock, just as numbers of American dairy herds are made up wholly or in part of select cows from stock not artificially modified; but in particular it includes certain strains naturally possessing high milking qualities, as the Nubian, and kindred or similar breeds of Bengal and China, to which must be added classes bred with continuous care to the same end, as the goats of Malta, France, Switzerland, and, in recent years, of England. The Nubian an