Glass -06 /4 (bjo^^2,J,.K*yait RECOLLECTIONS MIRABEAU. 6 ,,,..■.':"-«>'»"**''"''"■■' X"^ %K • i- ^ yt-v RECOLLECTIONS MIRABEAU, AND OF THE TWO FIRST LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLIES FRANCE. BY ETIENNE DUMONT OF GENEVA. *« " ' yi:^^^ ^^^^fS. ^^,^,,..^v^^ CAREY & LEA— CHESTNUT STREET 1833. ({ JUL ^ 1B8E «»-• ^N^^'.'^ ^^^..A^ CONTENTS Preface by the English Editor. . . xviii Preface by the Genevese Editor. . . . xxiii CHAPTER I. y Motives which induced the author to write these Recollections. The revolution of Geneva in 1789, determines his departure for Paris with M. Du- roverai. Desire of taking advantage of M, Nec- ker's return to office to do something in favour of the Genevese exiles. Origin of the author's acquaintance with Mirabeau. Journey to Paris with Sir Samuel Romilly in 1788. Mirabeau's residence in England in 1784. His activity and industry as a writer. His reputation at Paris in 1788. First interview with Mirabeau. Some traits of his private character. His work on the Prussian monarchy. Major Mauvillon the princi- pal author. Quarrel between M. de Calonne and M. Necker about the deficit. M. Necker's answer. Mirabeau forms the project of replying. Why he Vi CONTENTS. abandons it. Visit to Bicetre and the Salpetriere. Romilly writes an energetic description of them. Mirabeau translates it. Discussion between Mira- beau, de Bourges and Claviere. Dupont de Ne- mours. Anecdotes. Champfort. A saying of Mirabeau on Champfort. General feeling in polite circles at Paris. Some traits of the private cha- racter of Sir Samuel Romilly. Note given to the author by Mirabeau. . . . . . 41 CHAPTER II. Journey from London to Paris in 1789. Elections of deputies at the bailliages. Regulations for the election, made whilst breakfasting at Montreuil- sur-Mer. Success of these regulations. Inter- view with M. Necker. Residence at Claviere's at Surene. Committees at Claviere's and Brissot's. The Duke de la Rouchefoucauld. Confusion of ideas at this period. Saying of Lauraguais. Right of representation claimed by Palissot. As- sem.bly of the sections. Difficulty of proceeding. Assembly of electors. M. Duval-d'Espremenil. M. de Lauraguais, bourgeois of Paris, Opening of the states-general. Aspect of the tiers-Hat. Reflection upon the verification of the powers. 61 CHAPTER in. How Mirabeau was situated in the assembly, on the opening of the states-general- His bitterness CONTENTS. VU against the assembly. Conversations on this sub- ject. The author engages him to be more mode- rate. Intimacy between Mirabeau and Duroverai. Little committees. Duroverai's plan for bringing Necker and Mirabeau together. Adopted by Mal- louet. Difficulty of an interview. It takes place. Mirabeau's saying on Necker. Embassy to Con- stantinople. Ottoman Encyclopaedia. Mirabeau's first triumph at the tribune. Debut of Robespierre. . Efiect of his speech. Saying of M. Reybaz con- cerning him. Sieyes, his character and habits. The bishop of Chartres. Anecdotes of this pre- late • . . 73 CHAPTER IV. Inaction of the tiers during the disputes of the orders. Its effect upon the public. Motion of Sieyes upon the title of the assembly. Title of national as- sembly proposed. This question debated between the author, Duroverai and Mirabeau. The latter determines to oppose this title. Speech written by the author in the hall of the assembly. Mirabeau adopts it. Its effect upon the assembly. Author's anxiety. Sieyes's motion carried. Its effect. Du- roverai forms the plan of a royal session. Mallouet undertakes to communicate it to Necker. This plan concealed from Mirabeau. It is spoiled by the influence of the court party. Royal session. Its effect upon the assembly and the public. Re- flections. Circumstance which determined Nec- ker to absent himself. Mirabeau's anger against viii CONTBNTSo Duroveraio What he thinks of Necker. His opinion upon the session. .... 92 CHAPTER V. Agitation of the people after the royal session. Cause of this agitation. Saying of Sieyes on the Breton club. Attitude of the court. Arrival of troops. Mirabeau's speech. Address to the king. Mirabeau undertakes to write it. Con- fides this task to the author. Anecdote. General uneasiness. Supposed projects of the court. Mi- rabeau fears being arrested. Character of the king on his arrival. Death of the Marquis de Mirabeau. Work upon the events of the revolu- tion 112 CHAPTER VI. Courrier de Provence. Its origin. Partnership between the author. Duroverai and Mirabeau, Success of this journal. Negligence and dishon- esty of the bookseller. Annoyances. Embar- rassment of Mirabeau. His connexion with Madame le Jay. The journal has a new editor. It begins to fall. New arrangements. Judg- ments upon the Courrier de Provence. What ultimately became of it. ... 126 CONTENTS. Ili IX CHAPTER VII. Complete union of the orders. Aspect of the as- sembly. Address to the people. Mirabeau re- quests the author to write it. Cause of its want of success. Weakness of the assembly regarding the tumults. Fear and mistrust of the government. Cause of it. General opinion in favour of the re- volution. Causes which led to an alteration in their opinion. Work of Burke. Declaration of the rights of man. Discussion. Opinion of the author and of Mirabeau on this subject. Sitting of the 4th of August. Reflection upon it. Anger of Sieyes. His opinion. That of Mirabeau upon the assembly. Effect of this sitting upon the peo- ple 134 CHAPTER VIII. Discussion upon the veto. Marquis de Caseaux and his speech. Difficulties of Mirabeau in reading it. Anecdote. Public opinion. Improper mode of proceeding in the assembly. Impatience of show- ing off. Love of making motions. Some traits of French character. Compared with the English. Regulations by Romilly. Rejected by the assem- bly. Opinion of Brissot, Sieyes, &c. upon Eng- land. Saying of Duroverai. Mirabeau applies it to Mounier. ....... 148 # CONTENTS, CHAPTER IX. Camille Desmoulins. LaClos. His connexion with Mirabeau. Was Mirabeau acting in concert with the Duke of Orleans ? Facts for and against. Translation from Milton against royalty. Du- roverai prevents its publication. Saying of Mira- beau upon the events of Paris. His conduct on the 4th and 5th of October. Aspect of the inte- rior of the assembly. Anecdotes. Desertion of several deputies. . . . . . 159 CHAPTER X. Discussion upon finances. Mirabeau's reasons for supporting M. Necker. Effect of his speech. Singular compliment paid to Mirabeau by Mole. Address to the nation. Mirabeau confides to the author the task of writing it. Want of success of this address. Mirabeau proposes a vote of thanks to Lafayette and Bailly. What determined him. Project for bringing Mirabeau into office. Motion to prevent it. Civic inscription. Proposal of Sieyes. Mirabeau brings it forward. Law con- cerning bankrupts. Martial law. . . 173 CONTENTS. XI CHAPTER XI. Connexion of Mirabeau with the court. Confidence on this subject. Plan of a counter-revolution by Mirabeau. King's departure. Basis of the plan. Appeal to the nation. Decrees of the assembly annulled. Immediate convocation of another as- sembly. Surprise of the author. His resolution. Conversation and discussion of the plan. Mira- beau promises to renounce it. Another mode is adopted. The Marquis de Favras. His trial. Uneasiness of Mirabeau. Discussion on church property. P6Iin author of Mirabeau's speeches on this subject. His connexion with Mirabeau. Anecdotes. . ..... 186 CHAPTER XII. Mirabeau's habits changed. His house. Luxury. Expenses. He refuses to take his father's title. Receives 20,000 francs a month. His connexion with Prince Louis d'Aremberg. Quarrel between Mirabeau, Clavifere and Duroverai. The author reconciles them. Gradual election. Idea of the author. Mirabeau's motion. Barnave opposes it. Mirabeau abandons it. Reflections. . . 203 XII M CONTENTS. CHAPTER XIIL Author's departure. Motives. Barrere. Barnave. Petion. Target. Mnlouet. Volney. Robes- pierre. Morellet. Necker. Champfort. Re- turn to Paris with Achille Duchatelet. His cha- racter. Anecdotes. Conversation vi^ith Mirabeau. His connexion with the queen. He directs the court party. Report of diplomatic committee. Author's share in it. Anecdote. Increased ex- pense in Mirabeau's style of living. Remark of the author. The Abbe Lamourette, Mirabeau president of the assembly. Opinion thereon. Mi- rabeau's ill health. His forebodings. Emotion on taking leave of the author. He prophecies on the fate of France. His death. . . .213 CHAPTER XIV. Private life of Mirabeau. Anecdote on his mar- riage. Correspondence with Madame Mounier. How he wrote it. Portrait of Mirabeau. Con- sidered as an author. Distinctive characteristic of his writings. As a political author. His good qualities. Defects. Compared with Fox, with Barnave. His private habits. As member of the assembly. Venality. Saying on this subject. Despair at not enjoying a spotless reputation. Plis vanity. Saying of the author. Public character of Mirabeau. His object Designs, Cause of CONTENTS. XIU their failure. Charactoristic trait of his genius. Political sagacity. Powers of prophecy. Know- ledge of mankind. . . . . . 232 CHAPTER XV. Detached anecdotes. Mirabeau's habit of giving nicknames. How he designated Sieyes, d'Espre- menil, Lafayette, Necker, Claviere. His opinion of Washington. Saying concerning the assembly. Annoyance at praise bestowed upon mediocrity. Saying of the author on this subject. Viscount de Mirabeau. Laughable answer. Personal courage of Mirabeau. Adored by his domestics. Visit to the Bastille. His friendship for Cabanis. Cause of his death. Last moments. Legacy to the as- sembly. Activity. Hopes of becoming minister. 251 CHAPTER XVL Author's return to Paris. Flight of the king to Varennes. Aspect of the assembly. Effect of the king's flight upon the people. Shade of Mira- beau. Project of a paper. Its object. Why re- nounced- Paine at Paris. Confidence of Ducha- telet. Placard in favour of the republic. Con- dorcet becomes a republican. Claviere, Brissot, Petion, &c. discuss the question. Origin of this opinion. Condorcct's motives and influence., Lameth, Barnave, &c. join the king. The author returns to London with Paine. Opinion on this XIV CONTENTS. writer. Details given by d'Andre on the assem- bly. His complaints. Reflections. Supposed dialogue between d'Andr6 and his servant, recited by Sieyes. 265 CHAPTER XVn. General reflections on the revolution. Its causes. Nine causes of the faults of the assembly. Hete- rogeneous composition. Bad mode of carrying on proceedings. Immutability of constitutional de- crees. Fear of a counter-revolution. Emigration. • Affiliation and institution of the Jacobins. Wrong measures of the court party, &c. Causes of the fall of the constitution. Unity of the assembly. Absolute independence. Ineligibility of the members of the first assembly to the second. Im- mutability of the constitutional laws. Opinion on the national assembly. Author regrets his want of memory and curiosity. .... 284 CHAPTER XVIII. Arrival of Petion in London. Object of his journey. How accomplished. D'Andre. His character. His talents. Persecuted by Brissot. Some par- ticulars concerning Brissot's character. Talley- rand. Anecdotes. Object in coming to Lon- don. Reception by the king and queen. Author returns to Paris. Reasons. Accompanies Talley- rand and Duroverai. ..... 294 CONTENTS, XV CHAPTER XIX. Arrival at Paris. Conversation with Talleyrand. Anecdote on the consecration of the clergy. As- pect of the legislative aasembly. Divided into three parties. The king governed by the Feuil- lans. Girondists. Their object. M. de Lessart. Impeachment by Brissot. Author reproaches Brissot. Reflections. De Graves. Anecdotes. Author secretly consulted on the choice of a war minister. Speech to bring the Girondists into power, made by Gensonne. Petion's speeches. Vergniaud. Guadet. Gensonne, Buzot. Rce- derer. Condorcet. ..... 304 CHAPTER XX. The author taken to Roland's. Character of the lat- ter. Madame Roland. Memoirs. Servan. Lou- vet. Lanthenas. Pache. Claviere is appointed minister. His life and character. His ambition. Activity. Madame Claviere. Her illness. Cause of recovery. Legislative assembly and Giron- dists. . . 322 CHAPTER XXL Declaration of war against Austria. Reticences in the memoirs of Dumouriez. Austrian committee, XVI CONTENTS. Brissot desirous of war. Duchatelet refutes the objection of the desertion of old officers. Din- ners at Claviere's and Dumouriez's. Gaiety of Louvet and Dumouriez. The latter communicates to the author his report on the war. Condorcet's weakness. Appointment of an embassy to Eng- land. Talleyrand. Chauvelin. Hesitation. Du- mouriez puts an end to them. Garat. Embassy badly received in London. Pitt and Chauvelin. The embassy at Ranelagh. The public shun them. The Duke of Orleans. .... 334 CHAPTER XXH. Object of the embassy. Maintenance of peace. Work of Garat. 10th of August. Talleyrand goes to Paris. Presses the author to accom- pany, him. Refusal. Motives. The Genevese government request him to proceed to Paris. Army at the gates of Geneva. Montesquiou. Travels with an Irish quaker who is come to France to make proselytes. Arrival at Paris. The author determines Brissot and Clavi^re to support ' the Genevese treaty. Gasc sent by the republic. Dinner at Claviere's. Lebrun's ode. Secret confided to the author by Gensonne. Intrigues by Grenus. The author proceeds to Geneva. 353 Appendix. . . . . . . . 369 PREFACE ENGLISH EDITOR There is no public character whose actions have been more the subject of misrepresenta- tion, and over v\^hom calumny has had greater sv\^ay, than the Count de Mirabeau. He is known in this country rather as one of the most profligate promoters of the French revo- lution, than as the most extraordinary man of his age, in those surpassing endowments of mind in which he far surpassed all the great luminaries of that brilliant period; and it has been reserved for Dumont, a man of high character and unsullied principles, to rescue his name from the blind obloquy by XVlll PREFACE BY which it has been so long and so unjustly ob- scured. With all his vices, and they were by no means few, Mirabeau had many redeeming qualities. The former have been exaggerated with all the virulence of party hatred, while the latter have been concealed with equal malignity. This is unjust. A man, whatever be his errors, should go to posterity with the benefit of his good as well as the odium of his evil qualities. In these Recollections, Dumont, the friend of Mirabeau, has concealed nothing, nor has he "set down aught in malice." He has not shrunk from the task of exposing the blemishes of a master-mind, at the same time that he exhibits the splendour of its superior endowments. He has candidly stated Mirabeau's good and bad qualities without disguise, and while it will ap- pear that there is much to despise, it will be found that upon the whole, there is perhaps more to admire. Justice has been rendered to an erring but illustrious man. With all his vices, Mirabeau was an ardent patriot. The good of his country was mingled even With his dying aspirations, and the love THE ENGLISH EDITOR. xix of France ceased in his heart but with his last breath. His great powers of intellect and tran- scendant eloquence maintained his popularity through all the fluctuating changes attendant upon one of the greatest political convulsions ever recorded in history ; and by the ascendency of his energetic mind, he awed Robespierre and the jacobin anarchists into harmless insignifi- cance. Had his life been spared, there is no doubt that the French revolution would have taken another direction, and the horrible ex- cesses of the reign of terror never have blackened the page of French political regeneration. His death was the knell of the French monarchy ; — the glory of a long line of kings was buried in the grave of Mirabeau. Dumont's Recollections contain the most valuable materials for history. Facts hitherto unknown, the secret causes of many of those great and surprising events which have puzzled the acutest research of the historian, are laid open. However we may regret that the work remains unfinished, we cannot but be thankful for the abundance of information supplied by these Recollections, every page of which is of XX PREFACE BY momentous interest. Our regret arises from the very perfection of the work even in its un- finished state ; and had Dumont found leisure to fill up the periods connecting its different parts, and to give his promised account of the revolu- tions of Geneva, subsequent to that of 17S9, and in which he was himself an actor, this volume would form the completest compendium of the French revolution ever given to the public. In reflecting upon the events contained in this book, the philosophic mind cannot but be forcibly struck with the disproportion between causes and effects in political convulsions, when once the edifice of the state has begun to totter upon its foundations. On these occasions, the most insignificant circumstance, like the chance spark which, unperceived, may slowly spread its latent flame and ultimately destroy the noblest edifice, often leads to astounding results, even to the ruin of states and the overthrow of empires. Such was the case in France ;— and such will be the case in all revolutions proceeding from the same causes. It is a lamentable fact that governments founded upon the barbarous re- mains of feudality — and most governments of THE ENGLISH EDITOR. XXI modern ages are in this predicament — naturally divide the state into two classes, whose hostility to each other is instinctive. A few privileged individuals hold the reins of power, and for their own interest and advantage, oppress the great mass of the people. When at length the latter discover and claim their just rights, those rights should be fairly and frankly admitted, otherwise the authority by whom they are withheld must ultimately, even in the absence of tumult and bloodshed, be crushed by the inert preponde- rance alone of the discontented mass of the population. Had this self-evident principle been admitted by the blind and bigotted aristo- cracy of France, no convulsions would have taken place, nor would the freedom of the French people have been cemented with blood. The inveterate and unjust prejudices of the nobles, and more particularly of the members of the royal family — which even five and twenty years of misfortune and exile could not eradicate — ^led immediately to those first excesses which showed the people their strength and betrayed the weakness of the government. It is singular that neither the fruits of experience, nor the pangs of personal suflTering, can rectify Xxii ENGLISH editor's PREFACE. the warpings of the human mind ; and in the feelings which, in 1789, induced the Count d'Artois to convert the conciliatory object of the royal session into the immediate cause of the first revolutionary insurrections, may be traced the same spirit of bigotry, which in 1830 led him, as Charles X, to issue the ordinances by which he lost his crown. Numerous other examples might be adduced which would form a collection of valuable les- sons for kings and statesmen. But alas ! man profits not by the experience of others — often- times not by his own ; and it is not until we have obstinately and wickedly brought on the evil, that we choose, amid the pangs of tardy and useless repentance, to open our eyes to truth! In oflfering Dumont's ideas to the public in an English garb, it only remains for the English editor to add that his sole aim has been to give the author's meaning with clearness and preci- sion. If he has failed, it is not from want of zeal and attention. G. H. C. London, 29ih March, 1832. PREFACE BY THE GENEVESE EDITOR It is not my intention to write a biographical notice of M. Etienne Dumont. Two illus- trious authors, M. de Candolle and M. de Sis- mondi, have already paid their tribute of admi- ration to the memory of their departed friend and fellow-countryman. I cannot do better than refer the reader to the Bihliotheque uni- verselle^^ and the Revue encyclopedique^-\ in which they have deposited, with all the warmth of friendship, the expression of their regret at * Bihliotheque universelle, November 1829. t Revue encyclopediqitc^ vol. 44, p. 258. XXIV PREFACE BY the loss which our country, science and litera- ture have just sustained. To render, however, the present work more intelligible, it is necessary that I should trace, in as rapid a sketch as possible, the principal circumstances of the author's life, especially those preceding the period to which the work alludes. When I have explained his connexion with politics and political men, long before 1789, and the rank which he has since held, in the literary world, it will be more easy to under- stand how he, a stranger to France and to the great acts of the French revolution, should have been able to relate facts hitherto unknown, and have acquired the right of passing judgment upon men and events. M. Etienne Dumont, of Geneva, spent the early part of his life in his native country, where his talents as a preacher gained him well de- served renown. In 1783, he left Geneva, in consequence of its political troubles, and went to St Petersburgh to join some members of his family who had settled there. During a resi- dence of eighteen months in this city, he was equally successful, and obtained the high THE GENEVESE EDITOR. XXV consideration due to his merit and noble cha- racter. He left St Petersburgh in 1785, and went to London to reside with Lord Shelburne, then a minister of state, who confided to him the general education of his sons. Lord Shelburne, afterwards Marquis of Lansdowne, soon dis- covered the great talents of M. Dumont, whom he made his friend. It was in the house of this minister that he became acquainted with some of the most illustrious men of the country ; and amongst others, with Sheridan, Fox, Lord Holland, Sir Samuel Romilly and Mr Brougham, then a barrister, now Lord High Chancellor of England. His connexion with these distinguished in. dividuals, founded upon friendship, similarity of opinions and literary occupations, and the pursuit of great objects of public utility, gave them full opportunities of appreciating his high worth. He was generally known to be a man of profound knowledge, correct judgment, irre- proachable character, and lively and brilliant wit. Each did him justice during his life, and D XXVI PREFACE BY they who have survived him continue to honour his memory. He formed a very particular intimacy with Sir Samuel Romilly, a man equally distinguished by his private virtues and his great talents as a lawyer and a political orator. The friendship which united these two men, increased daily, nor did its activity cease till the death of Sir Samuel Romilly. M. Dumont was inconsola- ble for this loss, and never mentioned his de- parted friend without tears. In 1788, they undertook a journey to Paris together, and it was under Sir Samuel Romilly 's auspices that M. Dumont first became acquainted with Mirabeau. During a sojourn of two months in the French capital, he saw the latter every day, and a certain affinity of talents and intel- lect led to an ultimate connexion between two men so opposed to each other in habits and cha- racter. It was on his return from Paris, that Dumont began his acquaintance with the cele- brated Bentham, which had so complete an in- fluence over his future opinions and writingSy and fixed, as it were, his career as a writer on legislation. THE GENEVESE EDITOR. XXVH Dumoiit, penetrated with a lively admiration for the genius of this extraordinary man, and profoundly struck with the truth of his theory and the consequences to w^hich it so naturally led, applied all his talents to make the writings of the English publicist known, and devoted the greater part of his life in rendering availa- ble to the world at large, the exhaustless store of knowledge which the ever active genius of Mr Bentham was always increasing.* In 1789, M. Dumont suspended his labours in England to proceed to Paris with M. Duro- verai, ex- attorney-general of the republic of Geneva. The object of this journey was to ob- tain, through the return of M. Necker to office, and the events then passing in France, an unre- stricted restoration of Genevese liberty, by can- * The following works are the result of this labour : 1° Trea- tises on legislation^ published in 1822, in 3 vols, 8vo, now in their third edition ; 2° Theory of punishments and rewards^ 2 vols, 8vo, also in its third edition ; 3" Tactics of legislative assemblies, two editions, 1815 and 1822 ; 4° Judicial evidence, published in 1823, and a second edition in 1830 j 5«* Judicial organization and codification, 1 vol. published in 1828. I do not here mention the numerous editions published in foreign countries. XXVlll PREFACE BY celling the treaty of guarantee between France and Switzerland, which prevented the republic from enacting new laws without the consent of the parties to this treaty. The necessary steps to which this mission gave rise, brought M. Dumont into connexion with most of the lead- ing men in the constituent assembly, and made him an interested spectator, sometimes a par- ticipator in the events of the French revolution. The importance of the changes about to be operated, and the immense interest which this period inspired, determined M. Dumont to follow closely the course of events. Like all the other generous and elevated minds in Eu- rope, he offered up his vows for the realization of the great hopes to w^hich the first proceed- ings of the national assembly had given rise, and was desirous of assisting at occurrences which he considered the forerunners of a new political era. His former acquaintance with Mirabeau was renewed immediately after his return to Paris, and it contributed to prolong his residence in France, during which he co- operated in many of the works of that cele- brated man ; but being afterwards attacked in THE GENEVESE EDITOR. xxix pamphlets and other periodicals as one of Mi- rabeau's writers, he felt much hurt at his name being mentioned publicly, and determined to return to England. The reputation of being a subaltern writer was, as he himself states, by no means flattering, and that of an influential con- nexion with a man whose character was not untainted, alarmed his delicacy. From that period he sedulously employed his time in pre- paring Mr Bentham's manuscripts for publica- tion. In 1814, the restoration of Geneva to inde- pendence, induced M. Dumont to return to that city, which, subsequently, he never quitted for any length of time. Until 1829, he devoted his talents to his country, to which he rendered very eminent services. It would be a w^ork of supererogation to recall his claims to the grati- tude of his fellow-citizens. All know and acknowledge how much they are indebted to his patriotism and devotion ; and to the general mass of readers such details would present but little interest. In the autumn of 1829, he undertook a tour of pleasure to the north of Italy in company with one of his friends, M. Bellamy XXX PREFACE BY Aubert;* and his family were impatiently expecting his return, when they received the news of his death. They who were intimate with him can alone appreciate the charm which his goodness of heart, his active benevolence, and his great talents threw around him. He loved to encourage youth, and could make him- self the companion of all who approached him. Men of all ages and professions were sure to find, in his inexhaustible kindness and remarkable conversation, interest, advice, information and pleasure. Among the many unpublished works which M. Dumont's friendship, much more than his thirst for renown, confided to my care, I have selected for publication, in preference to any other, the one which appeared to me the best calculated to make him known in a literary * I cannot suffer this opportunity to pass without publicly expressing the gratitude entertained by M. Dumont's family towards M. Bellamy Auberf, whose active friendship and affec- tionate attentions soothed the last moments of his friend. This consolatory circumstance, in so painful an event, can alone in some degree assuage the grief produced by a death so unexpected, which at a distance from his family and country, carried off a man in whose heart the love of both predominated. THE GENEVESE EDITOR. XXXI capacity different from that upon which he founded his honourable fame. It also appeared to me that a work, like the present, would diminish in value, in proportion to the distance of its publication from the events it records and the persons whom it makes known. This work, besides, contains materials for history which it is but just to submit to the judgment and criti- cism of those best able to appreciate them, I mean the contemporaries of the great epoch to which they refer. I must likewise state that of M. Dumont's other posthumous works, some are not finished, whilst others, written by parts and at different times, are not in a fit state to appear before the public. A last work of revi- sion is yet necessary for the purpose either of placing the different detached portions in the order pointed out by their author, or of separa- ting the parts that are terminated and publishing them in a miscellaneous form. But all these reasons, derived from the subject itself, were not the only ones which fixed my determination. I was influenced in my choice principally from a desire of showing M. Dumont in a work en- tirely his own. Hitherto he has been known XXXll PREFACE BY in the literary and scientific world only as the propagator of M. Bentham's ideas, and few are able to appreciate the full merit of his labours. M. Dumont had no literary ambition; satisfied with the esteem of the distinguished individuals who knew him, he considered himself suffi- ciently rewarded by the consciousness of having contributed to the happiness of mankind by the propagation of useful ideas; and he never sought, I will not say to raise his fame at the expense of that which his celebrated friend had so justly earned, but even to claim the share of renown to which he was really entitled. His own thoughts and ideas merged in those of Mr. Bentham, and he gave the whole to the public under the name of that great publicisty without ever troubling his head about the portion of honour and esteem which he should derive from them. But if such unequal participation suited M. Dumont's modesty, it is no less incumbent upon me to endeavour to place him in the rank which is his due. God forbid, however, that I should desire here to raise a controversy, by claiming for M. Dumont all or the principal part of the merit belonging to the works which THE GENEVESE EDITOR. XXxiii appeared under the name of Mr Bentham. It would be against evidence, and would, moreover, be a violation of the respect I owe to M. Du- mont's memory ; for the latter did not cease, to the end of his life, expressing his enthusiastic admiration of the English publicist* My * This is what he wrote a few days before his death : "What I most admire is, the manner in which Mr Bentham has laid down his principle, the development he has given to it, and the rigorous logic of his inductions from it. The first book of the Treatises on legislation, is an art of reasoning upon this princi- ple, of distinguishing it from the false notions which usurp its place, of analyzing evil, and of showing the strength of the legislator in the four sanctions, natural, moral, political, and religious. The whole is new, at least with regard to method and arrangement, and they who have attacked the principle generally, have taken good care not to make a special attack upon the detailed exposition of the system. Egotism and mate- rialism ! How absurd ! Nothing but vile declamation and insipid mummery ! Look into the catalogue of pleasures, for the rank which the author assigns to those of benevolence, and see how he finds in them the germ of all social virtues ! His admirable Treatise upon the indirect means of preventing crime^ contains, among others, three chapters sufficient to pulverise all those miserable objections. One is on the cultivation of benevo- lence, another on the proper use of the motive of honour, and the third on the importance of religion when maintained in a proper direction ; that is to say, of that religion which conduces to the benefit of society. I am convinced that Fenelon himself, £ XXxiv PREFACE BY design is solely to prove, that if M. Dumont consented to work in the second rank, if he preferred in some sort to abandon his own stock, and cultivate the ideas of another, it was the eJQTect of choice, not necessity ,• and nothing can answer my purpose better, than the publication of a book written solely by himself, which shows in detail, and by precise facts, the high conside- ration which he enjoyed from the celebrated men with whom he lived, and proves the depth would have put his name to every word of this doctrine. Con- sider the nature and number of Mr Benthara's works ; see what a wide range he has taken in legislation ; and is it not acknow- ledged, that no man has more the character of originality, independence, love of public good, disinterestedness, and noble courage in braving the dangers and persecutions which have more than once threatened his old age ? His moral life is us beautiful as his intellectual. Mr Benthara passes in England, whether with justice or not I am unable to determine, for the chief, I mean the spiritual chief, of the radical party. His name, therefore, is not in good repute with those in power, or those who see greater dangers than advantages in a reform, especially a radical reform. I do not pretend to give an opinion, either for or against, but it must be understood, that he has never enjoy- ed the favour either of government or of the high aristocracy ; and this must guide, even in other countries, those who desire not to commit themselves ; for Mr Bentham's ensign leads neither to riches nor to power. THE GENEVESE EDITOR. XXXV and correctness of his judgment, the elegance of his mind, his feelings of high honour, and gives, besides, a specimen of his own powers of composition. It will also be seen, in this work, how often men of eminence had recourse to his counsels, his information and his pen ; whence it may be inferred, that if he afterwards con- sented to become second to Mr Bentham, it was not from the speculation of an inferior mind, incapable of proceeding alone, and who would consider such an association as a real honne- fortune, but rather from that true modesty, which made him, provided the good were done, care little to whom it was attributed. M. Dumont by no means looked upon these Recollections as a finished work. He spoke of them as a sketch which he intended to go over again and complete. He intended them as notes upon things and persons ; as materials for a his- torical work of a higher order than simple memoirs; — ^but he alone could have made it complete, and I should consider it a breach of duty on my part, had I endeavoured to supply the deficiencies or omissions which may be remarked in it, or attempted to finish it even XXXVl PREFACE BY according to the plan he had himself laid down when talking on the subject. Whatever regret we may feel that the sudden death of the author should have prevented the completion of this work, it will nevertheless remain as one of the most interesting sources of information and research for the history of the period to which it refers. M. Dumont's intimacy with the principal personages of that epoch, and particularly with Mirabeau, afforded him the knowledge of many facts unknown to most of those who have writ- ten upon the same subject ; and besides obser- vations on the general events of the revolution, these Recollections contain a number of anec- dotes never published, and statements concern- ing persons and things, more or less important, no doubt, but which are all of great interest. What appears to me more particularly to add to the merit of this work, and distinguish it from every production of the same kind, is that M. Dumont, a stranger to France, would never consent, from a sentiment of propriety which does him much credit— very rare at that period — to take an active part in the events THE GENEVESE EDITOR. XXXVll which passed before his eyes, nor exercise any- public functions. He has, therefore, nothing to conceal, nor any motive for altering facts in order to present his own conduct in a more favourable light. His love of freedom and his great talents made him the confidant of great projects, and a contributor to important works, but never in any other capacity than as the friend or adviser of the real authors. The instant this association of intellect and talents attracted the public attention, and he perceived that the hopes he had founded on the patriotism of those with whom he was connected, faded before a sad reality, he hastened to abandon the place he occupied, and withdrew. I have only another word to say ; it is res- pecting the opinions formed by M. Dumont up- on the proceedings of the constituent assembly. Perhaps his judgments may be deemed severe; but if the period, when he wrote his Recollec- tions, be taken into consideration, that is to say 1799, when not many years had elapsed since the disorders into which anarchy had plunged France — and it be recollected that when he went to Paris, he had already resided several XXXVlll PREFACE BY years in England, it may seem less surprising that he should sometimes express strong disap- probation. Looking at the proceedings of the national assembly, over which a thoughtless and enthusiastic heat too often presided, he naturally assumed as his point of comparison, the prudent slowness and regular form of the English par- liament. This contrast must have struck him painfully, and he might have been the more induced to blame what he saw, because the labours of the constituent assembly did not pro^ duce the results anticipated by every friend of freedom. He would judge differently now, when subsequent events have placed this great epoch in its proper light. The action of time, which effaces or softens prejudices, and the succession of events which can alone enable us to look from an eminence, permit us now to form a correct judgment of the mission of the national assembly. It was called upon, at the very outset, to announce to Europe the destruc- tion of the ancient social order, and prepare for the establishment of a new one in France. They who then so strongly blamed it for having founded nothing, were not in a position fairly THE GENEYESE EDITOR, XXXIX to appreciate its works. Their wishes, founded, it is true, upon praise-worthy motives, made them unjust ; they demanded of the assembly more than it could perform ; and assigned it another task than that which Providence had fixed. A generous impatience to see a realiza- tion of the great destinies of man, made them anticipate the periods prescribed by the order of progress, and they bitterly vituperated the constituent assembly for not equalling the vast hopes which they had conceived. This assem- bly, however, which contained most of the great and generous minds then distinguished in France, accomplished with grandeur, bold- ness, and impartiality, the noblest and most ex- tensive task ever confided to any body of men. At the present time, when we can better appreciate the difficulties and dangers it had to encounter, and the immensity of the services it rendered to the cause of humanity, by destroying the obstacles which stopped the progress of civilization, we exact less, and are more grate- ful; — in short, we are become just. I might have softened expressions of severe criticism, and struck out certain passages which xl GENEVESE EDITOR's PREFACE. may displease some, but it would have been a betrayal of confidence. This work was a de- posit placed in my hands, and I restore it to the public such as it was intrusted to me, unaltered and untouched. J. L. DUVAL, Member of the Representative Couacil of Geneva. RECOLLECTIONS MIRABE AU CHAPTER I. I HAVE just read the ^^ Annals of the French Revo- lution," by Bertrand de Molleville. This work has recalled to my recollection a variety of facts whose secret causes are known to me; it has also reminded me of my connexion with many of the leading cha- racters of that period. A lapse of ten years has effaced a number of circumstances from my memory, and were I to wait much longer, I should retain only a very vague idea of the many remarkable events which occurred under my own observation. My friends have repeatedly urged me to commit to paper the details with which I have been in the habit of 42 RECOLLECTIONS entertaining them in private conversation. I have hitherto refused, from an invincible repugnance to speak of myself. Having been rather a spectator than an actor in these events, I can conscientiously declare, that in the little participation I had in them, my intentions were always pure, however defective may have been my judgment. But not having attached consequence to any thing I ever said or did, I have kept no journal, and have thus suffered many interesting matters to escape me. I did not, at the time, perceive their importance, and it is only by looking back at them through a lapse of years, that I am able to appreciate their value. In the work of Bertrand de Molleville, I have read many details which had already escaped my memory, and I feel the necessity of putting my own fugitive recollections into a permanent form. I cannot better employ my leisure hours at Bath than by devoting them to this task, which, if it prove tedious, as I fear it will, I have only to suspend, and throw into the fire what I have written. My journey to Paris was occasioned by the revo- lution at Geneva in 1789. I went thither with Duroverai, ex-attorney-general of Geneva, in con- sequence of M. Necker's return to office, and the events then passing in France. We had two objects in view : one to render Geneva wholly free, by an- nulling the treaty which prevented her from making OP MIRABEAU. 43 laws without the approbation of the powers which had become guarantees of that treaty ; the other, to complete that which the Genevese revolution had only commenced; for this revolution having been effected with great precipitation^ the popular party had obtained only a portion of the rights of which they had been deprived in 1782. The councils had yielded some of their usurped powers, but had man- aged to retain several. The Genevese residents in London were by no means satisfied with this arrange- ment, and the clause which they reprobated the most, was the one which provided that the exiles, though recalled, should not resume their offices and honours. Meetings had been held on this subject ; and, as I had not been banished, but was only a vol- untary exile, it was considered that I could plead the cause of the exiles with much more propriety than themselves. My notions of liberty had been strength- ened by my residence in England, and by the liberal spirit of the writings published, at that period, in France. I was one of the most active at our Gene- vese meetings ; and I undertook to write a pamphlet containing all the observations we had made upon the new Genevese code. My work was well received; and it was proposed to address it to our fellow citi- zens. Duroverai, who had just arrived from Ireland, persuaded me that the work would prove more effect- ive if published at Paris ; and that it was necessary 44 RECOLLECTIONS to prevent a ratification of the treaty by the powers, otherwise the imperfect state of things then existing, might be rendered permanent and conclusive. The affairs of Geneva are totally foreign to the present work. But it was necessary that I should make known my object in going to Paris^ and show that, by a concatenation of events, all connected with that object, I found myself mixed up with the French revolution. Before I enter upon my subject, I must premise that my principal recollections relate to Mirabeau, and I am therefore bound to begin by stating the origin of my connexion with him. In 1788, I spent the months of August and Sep- tember, at Paris, with my friend Mr Romilly, of London. Romilly is descended from a French fam- ily, who took refuge in England after the revocation of the edict of Nantes ; an event of which he never spoke without blessing the memory of Louis XIV, to whom he thus owed the obligation of being an Eng- lishman. He had embraced the profession of the law, and practised at the Chancery bar, where suc- cess is attended with much less eclat than in the Court of King's Bench. During Mirabeau's visit to London in 1784, he had become very intimate with Romilly. He was then engaged in his work on the order of Cincinnatus, and had in his portfolio plans and sketches of several other works, upon which he took good care to consult every OF MIRABEAU. 45 person capable of affording him information. He was then poor, and obliged to live by his writings. He wrote his Considerations on the Escaut^ from a letter by M. Chauvet, which gave him the first idea of the work. Having become acquainted with a geogra- pher, whose name I forget, he also meditated writing a universal geography. Had any one offered him the elements of Chinese grammar, he would, no doubt, have attempted a treatise on the Chinese language. He studied a subject whilst he was writing upon it, and he only required an assistant who furnished matter. He could contrive to get notes and addi- tions from twenty different hands t, and had he been offered a good price, I am confident he would have undertaken to write even an encyclopsedia. His activity was prodigious. If he worked little himself, he made others work very hard. He had the art of finding out men of talent, and of success- fully flattering those who could be of use to him. He worked upon them with insinuations of friendship, and ideas of public benefit.* His interesting and animated conversation was like a hone which he used to sharpen his tools. Nothing was lost to him. He * When, at a later period, Mirabeau wanted my services, he spoke to me in praise of my friends, and talked about Geneva. This was a species of Manz des Vaches — it softened and subju- gated me. Note by Dumont. 46 RECOLLECTIONS collected with care, anecdotes, conversations, and thoughts — appropriated, to his own benefit, the fruits of the reading and study of his friends — knew how to use the information thus acquired, so as to appear always to have possessed it — and when he had begun a work in earnest, it was seen to make a rapid and daily progress. In London he fell in with D . . . ., who was wri- ting a history of the Revolutions of Geneva, the first volume of which he had already published. D . . . . wished to be an author without its being known, and seemed to blame himself for writing this work. He pressed Mirabeau to take his manuscripts and com- pose a History of Geneva. In less than a week, Mirabeau showed him an extract he had made from the volume already published. It was done in a masterly style ; was energetic, rapid and interest- ing. I know not w^hat made D . . . . change his mind, but, on a sudden, he withdrew his manuscripts from Mirabeau. The consequence was a coolness, and something worse, between them. These two men could never have worked in conjunction. Mi- rabeau, however, declared that he only wanted the second place, and would willingly yield to D . . . . the honour of the undertaking ; but the truth is, he thought that his reputation would absorb that of his companion, and that D . . . . would be considered, at most, but as a mason who had brought the stones OF MIRABEAU. 47 and raortar for the edifice, of which Mirabeau was the architect. When we arrived at Paris in 1788, the character of the Count de Mirabeau was in the lowest possible state of degradation. He had been employed at Ber- lin by M. de Calonne, was connected with all the enemies of Neck er, against whom he had several times exercised his pen, and was considered as a dangerous enemy and a slippery friend. His lawsuits with his family — his elopements — his imprisonments and his morals, could not be overlooked, even in a city so lax as Paris ; and his name was pronounced with detes- tation at the houses of some of our most intimate friends. Romilly, almost ashamed of his former friendship for Mirabeau, determined not to renew acquaintance with him. But Mirabeau was not a man of etiquette ; and having learnt our address from Target, at whose house we had dined, he determined to call upon us. The noise of a carriage at the door drove Romilly to his room, desiring me, should it be a visitor on a call of ceremony, to say that he was out. Mirabeau was announced, and I did not send word to Romilly, because I thought he wished to avoid seeing the count ; and as his room was only separated by a thin partition from the one we were in, I con- cluded that he would be able to distinguish the voice of our visitor, and make his appearance if he pleased. Mirabeau began the conversation by talking of our 48 RECOLLECTIONS mutual friends in London. He then spoke of Gene- va, for he well knew that to a Genevese there was no greater pleasure than talking of his country. He said many flattering things of a city which, by producing so many distinguished, men, had contributed to the general mass, so large a share of genius and learning; and he concluded by affirming, that he should never be happy until he could liberate that city from the fetters imposed upon it by the revolution of 1782. Two hours seemed but a moment ; and Mirabeau was, in my estimation, the most interesting object in Paris. The visit ended by my promising to dine with him the same day, and he was to return and fetch me in his carriage. "With whom have you been talking so long?" said Romilly, on leaving his room, to which this long visit had confined him. — " Did you not recognise his voice ?'^ inquired I. — "No.'^ — "Yet you well know the individual, and I even think you must have heard a panegyric on yourself, which would have made a superb funeral oration.'^ — " What ! was it Mirabeau ?" — ^^ It was ; and may I be a fool all my life, if I allow the prejudices of our friends to prevent me from enjoying his company. I belong neither to Calonne's party, nor to Necker's ; but to his whose conversatiori animates and delights me. As a com- mencement, I am going to dine with him to-day.'^ Mirabeau soon returned, took us both with him, and OF MIRABEAU. 49 in a very short time overcame our prejudi- ces. We visited him often ; and taking advantage of the fine weather, made many excursions into the country. We dined with him in the Bois de Bou- logne, at St Cloud, and at Vincennes ; at which lat- ter place he showed us the dungeon in which he had been confined three years. I never knew a man who, when he chose, could make himself so agreeable as Mirabeau. He was a delightful companion in every sense of the word ; obliging, attentive, full of spirits, and possessed of great powers of mind and imagination . It was imposs- ible to maintain reserve with him ; you were forced into familiarity, obliged to forego etiquette and the ordinary forms of society, and call him simply by his name. Although fond of his title of count, and, at the bottom of his heart, attaching great importance to noble birth, he had too much good sense not to know when he could avail himself of it with propri- ety ; he therefore made a merit of its voluntary ab- dication. The forms of good breeding, which have been so properly compared to the cotton and other soft materials placed between china vases, to prevent their being broken by collision, keeps men at a cer- tain distance from each other, and prevents, as it were, the contact of hearts. Mirabeau rejected them. His first care was to remove such obstacles, and inti- mate intercourse with him was attended with a sort G 50 RECOLLECTIONS of agreeable asperity, a pleasant crudity of express- ion, more apparent than real ; for under the dis- guise of roughness, sometimes even of rudeness, was to be found all the reality of politeness and flattery. After the stiff and ceremonious conversations of for- mal good breedings there was a fascinating novelty in his, never rendered insipid by forms in common use. His residence at Berlin had supplied him with a stock of curious anecdotes ; for his scandalous letters were not then published. He was, at this period, publishing his book on the Prussian monarchy. This production consisted of a work by Major Mauvillon, and extracts from different memoirs procured at great expense. No one could, for a moment, suppose that, during a residence of only eight months at Berlin, Mirabeau could himself have written eight volumes, in which he had introduced every possible informa- tion relative to the government of Prussia. But he had the merit of employing the talents of an officer scarcely known to the government he served, and the Prussian ministers must have been much surprised at finding that a man who had made so short a sojourn in their country, could singly undertake so arduous a task, and succeed in supplying them with more ma- terials than could be found in the united offices of their several departments. This work is an illustra- tion, by facts, of Adam Smith's principles of political economy j and it clearly proves that Prussia has OF MIRABEAU. 51 always been a sufferer, whenever she has departed from those principles. This was the period of the famous quarrel between M. de Calonne and M. Necker, about the deficit. The former had good reasons for endeavouring, by a direct charge, to throw upon other shoulders the weight of his own responsibility. He had accused M. Necker of having imposed upon the nation by a statement, that on leaving office, instead of a defi- ciency, there was an overplus of ten millions of livres. M. de Calonne's article, teeming with arithmetical calculations and specious arguments, had produced a certain effect upon the public mind. M. Necker, who had just resumed office, had announced his reply as forthcoming. Mirabeau was preparing to refute the latter, even before it had appeared and he could possibly know its contents. M. Necker's enemies were in the habit of meeting at the house of Panchaud, the banker, a man of talent, and well versed in finance, but who, after a disgraceful bankruptcy, was lost in character more than he was ruined in fortune. On the publication of M. Necker's work, the committee met daily, and Mirabeau always attended to collect observations, and inveigh against the minister. He anticipated the most triumphant success ; and talked confidently of exposing the charlatan, ripping him open, and laying him at Colonne's feet, convicted of falsehood and incapacity. But this fierce ardour was 52 RECOLLECTIONS soon exhausted by its own violence ; and he said no more on the subject himself, nor was he pleased when any other person mentioned it in his presence. I often asked him why this refutation was delayed ; by what novelty of kindly feelings he spared the great charlatan, who was enjoying an unmerited repu- tation; and why Panchaud's committee deferred this great act of justice? Mirabeau, to get rid of these attacks, which, after his foolish boasting, he could not well parry, at length informed me that M. Necker's aid was necessary for the formation of the states-general, that his popularity was useful, and that the question of the deficit was absorbed by the more important one of the double representation of the tiers- etat. From this fact I infer that M. Necker's answer had proved victorious, and that his enemies could not succeed in injuring his character. We went with Mercier, the author of the ' ' Tableau de Paris," and Mallet-Dupan, to see these horrid dens, the Salpetriere and Bicetre. I never saw any thing more hideous ; and these two establishments at the gates of the metropolis strongly display the care- less frivolity of the French. The hospital .contained the germ of every loathsome disease ; the prison was the school of every crime. Romilly, much moved, wrote, in a letter to a friend, an energetic description of these two receptacles of wretchedness. I men- OF MIRABEAU. 53 tioned this description to Mirabeau, who was anxious to see it. After reading it, to translate and publish it was the work of a single day ; and he completed a small volume by adding a translation of an anonymous paper on the administration of the criminal law of England. The work was announced as translated from the English, by the Count de Mirabeau; but the public, accustomed to disguises of this nature, imputed to him the authorship of both. The suc- cess of this book was great, and its profits covered his expenses for a month. Mirabeau enjoyed a high reputation as a writer. His work on the Bank of St Charles, his "Denunciation of Stock-jobbing," his "Considerations on the Order of Cincinnatus,'' and his "Lettres de Cachet," were his titles to fame. But if all who had contributed to these works had each claimed his share, nothing would have remained as Mirabeau's own, but a certain art of arrangement, some bold expressions and biting epigrams, and nu- merous bursts of manly eloquence, certainly not the growth of the French academy. He obtained from Claviere and Panchaud the materials for his writings on finance. Claviere supplied him with the subject matter of his Letter to the King of Prussia. De Bourges was the author of his address to the Batavi- ans, and I have often been present at the disputes between them, to which this circumstance gave rise. Mirabeau did not deny the debt, but de Bourges, 54 RECOLLECTIONS seeing the success of the work, was enraged at having been sacrificed to the fame of another. Mirabeau stood so high with the public, that the partners of his labours could not succeed in destroying a reputa- tion which they had themselves established for him. I have often compared Mirabeau to a general making conquests through his lieutenants, whom he afterwards subjects to the very authority they have founded for him. Mirabeau had certainly a right to consider himself the parent of all these productions, because he presided at their birth, and without his indefati- gable activity they would never have seen the light. Claviere, as much annoyed as any man could be at having served as a pedestal to Mirabeau's fame, had formed a connection with Brissot de Warville, with whom he wrote in conjunction. Mirabeau called Brissot a 'literary jockey, and spoke of him with con- tempt; but entertained a high opinion of Claviere, with whom he was desirous of a renewal of intimacy. There had been no direct rupture between them, but much bitter feeling. Claviere called Mirabeau a jackdaw, that ought to be stripped of his borrowed plumes; but this jackdaw, even when deprived of his borrowed plumes, was still armed with a power- ful spur, and could soar above all the rest of the lite- rary tribe. Mirabeau introduced us to Dapont de Nemours and Champfort. Dupont, author of the " Citizen's OF MIRABEAU. 55 Ephemerides/' and the zealous friend of Turgot, had the reputation of an honest man and a clever econo- mist; but he rendered himself a little ridiculous by the aifectation of importance with which he complain- ed of having to correspond with four kings. We found him one morning occupied in writing a work on leather^ in which he showed that the government had never been consistent in its regulations on this matter. "This work," said he^, "will be more en- tertaining than a novel ;" and, as a specimen, he read to us seven or eight heavy and tedious chapters ; but he rewarded us for this ennui by giving us many anecdotes of the assembly of notables, of which he had been secretary. He mentioned, among other things, a very successful bon-mot. Tithes were the subject of discussien. " Tithes," said the Archbishop of Aix, in a whining tone, " that voluntary/ offering of the devout faithful . . . " — "Tithes," interrupted the Duke de la Rochefoucauld, in his quiet and mod- est way, which rendered the trait more piquant, " that voluntary offering of the devout faithful, con- cerning which there are now forty thousand lawsuits in the kingdom." Champfort and Mirabeau kept up a reciprocal ex- change of absurd compliments. The former aifected independence of character even to singularity. Al- though intimate with several distinguished persons at court, particularly with M. de Vaudreuil, he always 56 RECOLLECTIONS made a point of railing, in their presence, against every thing connected with high office and elevated rank. He aimed at passing for a misanthropist ; but his dislike of human-kind arose from pride alone, and was manifested only in epigrams. Whilst others endeavoured, with a battering-ram, to overthrow the Colossus, he attempted to cripple him with shafts of satire. Knowing him afterwards more intimately, I saw a great deal of him ; and, in his passion for revo- lution, I could discern nothing but a species of wounded vanity, susceptible of no enjoyment save the one resulting from the overthrow of that superi- ority of talent which had given him umbrage. He hated the institution of marriage, because he was himself illegitimate; and he declaimed against per- sons of rank and influence, lest he should be suspect- ed of enjoying court patronage. By his own account, he was a severe moralist, and yet he sought his pleasures in the very coarsest and most degrading kind of voluptuousness. Mirabeau said that a statue ought to be raised to him by the physicians, because he had discovered, in the stews of the Palais Royal, the germ of a disease thought to be extinct — a kind of leprosy or elephantiasis. We had other acquaintances in Paris besides Mi- rabeau, among whom we dared not boast above our breath of our intimacy with the latter. These were the Duke de la Rochefoucauld, M. de Malesherbes, OF MIRABEAU. 57 M. de Lafayette, Mr Jefferson, the American minister, Mallet du Pan, the Abbe Morellet, and many other personages less known. French conver- sation at this period was much less trivial than it used to be. The approaching convocation of the states-general, the importance of passing political events, interesting questions on freedom, and the near approach of a crisis which would affect the fu- ture destinies of the nation, were all novel topics at Paris, where they excited a diversity of opinions, and raised a fermentation which, though yet but feebly developed, imparted a strong stimulus to conversation. Every mind plunged into uncertain futurity and speculated in accordance with his fears or his wishes. In the higher classes, not a single individual remained indifferent to what was passing, and even the mass of the people commenced an agitation of which they scarcely knew the object. The two months we spent at Paris were so well filled, the company we saw so varied, the whole of our time so profitably employed, the objects we be- held so interesting, and the scene so constantly changing, that in this short period I lived more than during whole years of my subsequent life. I was chiefly indebted to my fellow traveller for the recep- tion I met with. I was under his auspices, and as his society was much courted, I did not encounter neglect. 1 was proud of his merit, and when I per- H 58 RECOLLECTIONS "* ceived that he was understood and appreciated, my heart warmed with the exultation of friendship at the consideration he enjoyed without perceiving it. I cannot at present conceive how, in so short a time, we managed to get through all we performed. Romilly, always so quiet and measured in his motions, is yet a man of unceasing activity. He does not lose even minutes. He devotes himself in earnest to whatever he is doing; and, like the hand of a clock, never stops, although his motions are so equal as to be scarcely perceptible. I can fancy I see him now before me, overwhelmed with business in the most laborious of professions; nevertheless he finds leisure to read every important book that appears, recurs often to his classics, sees much company, and yet never appears pressed for time. Economy of time is a virtue I never possessed, and my days often pass away without leaving any trace. Romilly communicated his activity to me, and taught me an art which unfortunately I shall never be able to make available.* On our departure, Mirabeau accompanied us as far as Chantilly, where we spent a delightful day, making projects to meet again; and we agreed to keep up a regular correspondence, which, however, * Sir Samuel Romilly died in London in 1818. — Note by the Genevese Editor. OF MIRABEAU. 59 we did not even begin. Mirabeau was full of his plan concerning the stales-general. He foresaw the diffi- culties he should have to encounter in his election ; but he already aimed at becoming one of the repre- sentatives of the tiers-etaty from a notion that he should thereby raise himself to greater eminence, and that his rank would add fresh eclat to his popular principles. I will here give another instance of his activity — of his avarice, I may say, in collecting the smallest literary materials. He gave me a methodical list of the subjects we had discussed together in con- versation, and upon which we had differed. It was headed thus: " List of subjects which Dumont en- gages, upon the faith of friendship, to treat consci- entiously, and send to Mirabeau very shortly after his return to London. Divers anecdotes on his residence in Russia; biographical sketches of several celebrated. Genevese ; opinions on natiunal educa- tion,'' &c. There were eighteen items in all, and his recollection of them was a proof of his attention and faithful memory. He was desirous of forming a collection of such materials, that he might use them at his leisure. Mirabeau could adopt every style of conduct and conversation, and though not himself a moral man, he had a very decided taste for the so- ciety of those whose rigidity of principle and severity of morals contrasted with the laxity of his own. His mode of inspiring confidence was to confess candidly 60 RECOLLECTIONS the faults and follies of his youth, express regret at his former errors, and declare that he would endea- vour to expiate them by a sedulous and usefid appli- cation of his talents in future to the cause of humanity and liberty, without allowing any personal advantage to turn him from his purpose. He had preserved, even in the midst of his excesses, a certain dignity and elevation of mind, combined with energy of character, which distinguished him from those effeminate and worn out rakes, those walking shadows, with which Paris swarmed ; and one was tempted to admit, as an excuse for his faults, the particular cir- cumstances of his education, and to think that his virtues belonged to himself, and that his vices were forced upon him. I never knew a man more jealous of the esteem of those whom he himself esteemed, or one who could be acted upon more easily, if excited by a sentiment of high honour ; but there was nothing uniform and permanent in his character. His mind proceeded by leaps and starts, and obeyed too many impetuous masters. When burning with pride or jealousy, his passions were terrible ; he was no longer master of himself, and committed the most dangerous imprudences. Having thus explained the origin of my intimacy with Mirabeau, I return to the journey I undertook with M. Duroverai, in 1789, for the purpose of trying if, with M. Necker's return to office, we could not better the condition of the Genevese exiles. or MIRABRAU, 61 CHAPTER II. A SOMEWHAT ludicrous circumstance occurred dur- ing our journey. I have but an imperfect recol- lection of it. All was in a bustle for the election of the deputies; and the primary assemblies of the bailliages, composed of shopkeepers and peasants, knew not how to proceed with an election. We were breakfasting at Montreuil-sur-Merj if I recol- lect right, and while chatting with our host, the lat- ter acquainted us with the trouble and embarrassment attendant upon their meetings. Two or three days had been lost in disputes and confusion, and they had never even heard of such things as a president, a secretary, or voting tickets. By way of a joke, we determined to become the legislators of Mon- treuil, and having called for pen, ink and paper, began to draw up short regulations indicating the proper mode of conducting these elections. Never did work proceed more gaily than ours. In an hour it was complete, though interrupted every moment •62 RECOLLECTIONS by peals of laughter. We then read and explained it to our host, who, delighted at the idea of acquiring consequence, entreated that we would give it to him, assuring us that he would make good use of it. We would willingly have delayed our journey for a day to assist at this assembly and behold the incipient dawn of democracy in France, but we could not spare the time. Soon after our arrival at Paris, we were not a little surprised at reading in the public prints, that the assembly at Montreuil had finished its election the first of any, and great praises were bestowed upon the order which had been established there. This circumstance is not so unimportant as it might at first appear. It displays either the carelessness or the incapacity of a government which could or- der so unusual a thing as a popular election, without drawing up a regular form of proceeding, so as to prevent disputes and confusion. On our arrival at Paris, we waited on M. Necker, and in an interview with that minister, perceived that the question of the Genevese guarantee would not be so easily settled as we had anticipated. The king would neither consent to annul the edict of 1782, nor risk a refusal of his assent to an arrangement voluntarily entered into by both parties. As the negociation threatened to be long, I spent a few weeks at Claviere's country-house at Surene, where OF MIRABEAU. 63 I employed myself in re- writing my "Address to the citizens of Geneva." I was aided in this task by Claviere, Duroverai, and Reybaz, the latter being my Aristarchus for the style ; for this was my appren- ticeship in the art of composition, at least upon po- litical topics. The work was finished, and sent to Geneva two or three months after. I say nothing of the sensation it produced, for if I derive any plea- sure from continuing these memoirs, I shall have a long chapter to write on the subsequent revolutions of Geneva, and the individual part I took in them. Claviere's house at Surene was the rendezvous of many of the most distinguished personages of the French revolution. Mirabeau and Brissot were two of the most remarkable. I was aware of every thing^ that was passing at Paris ; I often went there for a day or two, in order not to neglect the acquaintances I had formed during my former residence in that city. I visited the Duke de la Rochefoucauld, M. de Lafayette, and M. de Malesherbes. I had since become very intimate with the Bishop of Chartres, at whose house I often met the Abbe Sieyes. I vis- ited also M. Delessert, Mallet-Dupan, Dr de La Roche, M. Bidderman and M. Reybaz. But du- ring the months of March and April, I was almost always at Surene, occupied with my work, and caring little about the approaching meeting of the states-- general. 64 llECOLLECTIONS I remember attending, at Brissot's and Claviere's, several meetings which they called committees, in which it was proposed to draw up declarations of right, and to lay down principles for conducting the proceedings of the states-general. I was only a spec- tator, and I never quitted one of these meetings without a feeling of mortal disgust at the chattering of these talkers. But the scene about to be unfold- ed was so important, that I was always to be found wherever there was any thing to be seen. I heard no interesting speeches, it is true ; but the feeling on the subject of liberty was unanimous. Cordiality, warmth and energy pervaded every heart, and in the midst of a nation endeavouring to shake off the tram- mels of feudal oppression, and which had abandoned its characteristic frivolity for a nobler pursuit, I felt inspired with the most enthusiastic ardour, and yield- ed to the most flattering anticipations. The French, against whom I had imbibed a prejudice of contempt, arising from my republican education, and which had been strengthened in England, now seemed to me quite a different people. I began to look upon them as free men, and participated in all the opinions of the most zealous partisans of the tiers-etat. I did not give much consideration to the questions which divided the French nation, but suffered myself to be borne away by my habitual opinions in favour of liberty. I never contemplated more than an imitation of the OF MIRABEAU. 65 English form of government^, which I considered the most perfect model of political institutions. But if I had not adequately studied the subject, neither had I the presumption to deliver an opinion upon it. I never spoke at any of these meetings, when they ex- ceeded the ordinary number of a friendly party. No one could be less desirous than I of making a display before a numerous auditory. I considered such a thing improper for a stranger, and my natural timid- ity strengthened my resolve not to make the attempt. Duroverai, although more accustomed to public as- semblies, and gifted, moreover, with a power of elo- quence which would have raised him to the highest rank in these committees, maintained a similar reserve, and had not even the modest ambition to un- dertake a part which he might have played with the most distinguished success. I will now state how we were at length dragged into the stream.* * In one of these meetings at Brissot's, the subject under dis- cussion was the several points to be inserted in the regulation for Paris. Amid a great number of propositions, we were greatly sur- prised at hearing Palissot move for a special article on the right of representation. We Genevese fancied that he meant the right of making representations or rather remonstrances to govern- ment. But he soon undeceived us by stating that this essential right, one of the most precious attributes of liberty, was now in the very act of beini( violated by government, in the most open manner, for M. Chenier's tragedy of Charles IX. was not allowed I 66 RECOLLECTIONS The only impression which these speeches and proceedings have left upon my mind is one of a chaos of confused notions. There was no fixed point of public opinion, except against the court, and what was then termed the aristocracy. Necker was the divinity of the day; and Sieyes, then little known to the people, had, in his writings, supplied with points of argument such as were fond of discussing public questions. Rabaud de Saint-Etienne and Target had acquired a reputation at least equal to that of Sieyes. They who anticipated a civil war, looked upon La- fayette as ambitious of becoming the Washington of France. These were the leading characters of the day. The Duke de la Rochefoucauld, distinguished by his simplicity, the excellence of his moral character, his independence of the court and his liberal princi- ples, assembled at his house the principal members of the nobility who had pronounced themselves in favour of the people, the double representation of the tiers, the vote by numbers, the abolition of privi- leges, &c. Condorcet, Dupont, Lafayette, and the Duke de Liancourt, were the most distinguished at to be performed. Being thus made acquainted with the nature of the right of representation, we could not help smiling at our blunder, when some one approaching me, whispered in my ear, " You perceive that, among the French, every thing ends with the theatre. " — Note by Dumont. OF MIUABEAU. 67 these meetings. The prevailing idea was that of giving a constitution to France. The princes and nobles, who would fain preserve and fortify the old constitution, formed, properly speaking, the aristo- cratic party, against whom a general outcry was raised. But although the clamour was great, many individuals were almost indifferent, because they were unable to appreciate the consequences of what was passing. The body of the nation, even at Paris, saw nothing more in the assembling of the states-general, than a means of diminishing the taxes ; and the creditors of the state, so often deprived of their dividends by a violation of public faith, considered the states-gene- ral as nothing more than a rampart against a govern- ment bankruptcy. The deficit had filled them with consternation ; they deemed themselves on the brink of ruin, and were anxious to establish the public revenue upon a sure foundation. Besides this, each order of the states- general had its parties ; the order of the nobility was divided into an aristocratic and a democratic faction ; so was that of the clergy, and so was the tiers-etat. It is impossible to describe the confusion of ideas, the licentiousness of imagination, the burlesque notions of popular rights, the hopes, apprehensions and passions of these parties. The Count de Lauraguais said that it was like a world, the day after its creation, when nations, rendered hostile by interest, were trying to settle their differences 68 RECOLLECTIONS and regulate their respective rights as if nothing had previously existed, and in making arrangements for the future, there was no past to be taken into consid- eration. I was present at Paris at the meetings of the sec- tions for the appointment of electors. Although there were orders to admit into these assemblies none but the inhabitants of the section in which they were respectively held, they were not enforced j for in France there was no feeling of jealousy in this res- pect. After the first few had entered, every de- cently dressed individual presenting himself at the door was allowed to pass. In many sections there was some diflSculty in obtaining the attendance of a sufficient number of persons. The citizens of Paris, surprised at the novelty of the thing, and rather alarmed at centinels being placed at the doors of the assemblies, remained at home out of danger, and de- termined to continue to do so until the first few days were passed. I was at the section of the Filles- Saint- Thomas f a central district inhabited by the most opulent classes. For many days not more than two hundred individuals were present. The diffi- culty of giving the first impetus to the machine was extreme. The noise and confusion were beyond any thing I can describe. Each individual was stand- ing, and all spoke at the same time, nor could the president succeed in obtaining silence for two minutes together. Many other difficulties arose on the man- OF MIRABEAU. 69 ner of taking the votes and counting them/ I had a store of curious anecdotes relative to this infancy of popular institutions, but by degrees they have been effaced from my memory. They were instances of the eagerness of conceited men to put themselves forward in the hope of being ejected. Here were likewise to be seen the first attempts at party intrigue. A list of candidates was rejected, and the elections were to be made amongst all per- sons present. The consequence of this was, that the votes were at first so much divided, that no absolute majority was obtained for any one candidate pro- posed, and it became necessary to repeat the poll several times. The assembly of electors were as slow and tumul- tuous in their proceedings as the district assemblies. The states-general met at Versailles several days before the deputies were elected for Paris. It is a remarkable fact that the Abbe Sieyes was the last deputy elected, and the only ecclesiastic appointed to represent the tiers-etat. Thus the man who had given the impulsion to the states- general and possessed the greatest influence in their formation, owed his being a member of that assembly to a mere chance. The elections at Paris were the last in the king- dom. The delay arose, I apprehend, from a discus- sion as to the mode of making them. Some pre- tended that it should be done by the three orders in 70 RECOLLECTIONS conjunction — others^ by the orders separately. Dur- ing this discussion, Duval d'Espresmenil, who had always been considered as a partisan of the tiers-etat, declared himself in favour of privileges ; and on this occasion the count de Lauraguais said to him jeer- ingly, " Eh ! M. Duval, as I do not prevent you from being noble, pray suffer me to be a bourgeois of Paris!" I was not at Versailles at the opening of the states, but went thither a few days afterwards. The three orders were in open quarrel about the verification of their powers. The Uers-etat wanted this verifica- tion to be made in common ; the two other orders insisted upon its being done separately. Though the question appeared to be of no importance, much in reality depended upon it. The tiers-etat wanted the two other orders to unite with them and form but one assembly ; in which case, the commons, from their numerical strength, would always maintain a preponderance. They adhered to this opinion with the greatest tenacity ; resisted every attempt to bring them into action, and contrived to cast upon the no- bility and clergy an imputation of obstinacy, which rendered the latter orders still more unpopular with the multitude. It was a great blunder of the government to leave this question unsettled. If the king had ordered the union of all three, he would have had the tiers-etat OF MIRABEAU. 71 for him ; and had he ordered the separation, he would have been supported by the nobility and clergy. The states-general would certainly not have begun their proceedings by an act of disobedience towards the king, then considered as the provisional legisla- tor. But in coming to no decision on the subject, he opened the lists to the corabattants^ and the royal authority was destined to become the prey of the victors. I had opportunities of seeing how much this delay generated and excited party feelings. The tiers- etat continued their proceedings, and at length went so far as to constitute themselves a national assembly, after having sent a peremptory summons to the nobil- ity and clergy, to which those orders declined paying any attention. All the seeds of disorder were sown during this interval, and this is a period to which the historian of the revolution ought to pay particular attention. When I entered the hall in which the States sate, there was neither object of discussion nor order. The deputies were not at first known to each other ; but every day made them better acquainted. Du- ring their proceedings, they took their places any where, chose the oldest among them to preside at their sittings, and spent their whole time in discussing trifling incidents, listening to news ; and, the provin- 72 RECOLLECTIONS cial deputies, in making themselves acquainted with Versailles. The hall was constantly full of visitors who went every where, and even took possession of the benches of the deputies, without any jealousy on the part of the latter, or claims of privilege. It is true that, not being yet constituted, they considered themselves rather as members of a club than of a body politic. OF MIRABEAU. - 73 CHAPTER III. I SOON found the person I was looking for. It was Mirabeau. In the course of a long conversation with him, I discovered that he was already annoyed with every body, and in open hostility with the majority of the deputation from Provence. I was informed, soon afterwards, that several humiliating circumstan- ces had occurred to vex him. When the list of deputies of the several hailliages was read, many well known names were received with applause. Mounier, Chapelier, Rabaud de Sainte-Etienne, and several others had been distin- guished by these flattering marks of approbation; but, when Mirabeau's name was read, there was a murmur of a different kind, and hooting instead of applause. Insult and contempt showed how low he stood in the estimation of his colleagues, and it was even openly proposed to get his election cancelled, when the verification of powers took place. He had employed raanceuvres at Aix, and at Marseilles, K 74 RECOLLECTIONS which were to be brought forward against the legality of his return ; and he himself felt so convinced that his election at Marseilles could never be maintainedj that he gave the preference to Aix, although he would have been much more flattered at representing one of the largest and most important cities in the kingdom. He had tried to speak on two or three occasions, but a general murmur always reduced him to silence. It was in this situation of spite and ill- humour;, that he published the two first numbers of an anonymous journal entitled, the ^^ States-General," a sort of lampoon upon the assembly. He compared the deputies to tumultuous school-boys, giving way to indecent and servile mirth. He severely attacked. M. Necker, the nation's idol. In short, this journal was a collection of epigrams. The government ordered its suppression ; but Mirabeau, more excited than discouraged by this prohibition, announced in his own name, his ^^ Letters to his constituents." No one durst dispute the right of a representative of the people to give an account of the public sittings of the assembly. With my friendship for Mirabeau, and the high opinion I entertained of his talents, it made my heart bleed to see him in such disgrace, especially as it inflamed his self-love, and made him, perhaps, do as much harm as he might have done good. I listened patiently to all his complaints and railings against the OF MIRABEAU. 75 assembly. In speaking of its members, he was prodi- gal in his expressions of contempt, and he already anticipated that all would be lost by their silly vanity, and jealousy of every individual who evinced supe- rior abilities. He thought, or rather affected to think, that he was repulsed by a sort of ostracism against talents j but he would show them, he said, that he could be even with them. In the midst of these bursts of passion, and these rodomontades of vengeance, I easily perceived that he was much affected, and even distinguished the tears of vexation in his eyes. I seized the earliest opportunity of applying a balm to the wounds of his self-love. I told him plainly and candidly, that his debut had offended every one ; that nothing was more dangerous than for a deputy who, like him, might aspire to the first rank in the assembly, to write a journal ; that to censure the body to which he belonged, was not the way to become a favourite with its members; that if, like me, he had lived in a republic, and seen the concealed springs of party intrigue, he would not so readily yield to discouragement; that he should quietly suffer all the half-talents and half-reputations to pass before him ; that they would destroy them- selves, and, in the end, each individual would be placed according to his specific gravity ; that he was- on the greatest theatre in the world ; that he could pot attain to eminence except through the assembly ; 76 RECOLLECTIONS that the slight mortification he had undergone, would be more than compensated by a single successful day ; and that if he were desirous of obtaining a permanent ascendency, he must follow a new system. This long conversation, which took place in the garden of Tri- anon, had an excellent effect. Mirabeau, feelingly alive to the voice of friendship, softened by degrees, and at length admitted that he was wrong. Soon after, he showed me a letter to his constituents, which he was about to publish. We read it together ; it was less bitter than former ones, but was still too much so. We spent a couple of hours in remodelling it, and entirely changing its tone. He even consent- ed, though with repugnance, to praise certain depu- ties, and represent the assembly in a respectable light. We then agreed that he should not attempt to speak until some extraordinary occasion should offer. Mirabeau had but a slight acquaintance with Du- roverai, but was well aware of his talents. He knew that Duroverai had acquired great experience in conducting the political affairs of Geneva, had a pro- found knowledge of jurisprudence, had drawn up the Genevese code of law^s, and possessed, in the highest degree, the art of discussion and the routine of popu- lar assemblies. All this rendered an intimacy with him very desirable ; and Mirabeau, who afterwards considered him as his Mentor, never took a step of any consequence without consulting him. At Ver- OF MIRABEAU. 77 sallies, we lodged at the hotel Charost. Claviere, who frequently came from Paris to see the assembly, had become reconciled to Mirabeau, and came often to our hotel, where we assembled now and then a few friends of our own way of thinking, and, in par- ticular, our countryman M. Reybaz, between whom and Mirabeau we endeavoured to promote an inti- macy. But it was some time before they became familiar. Reybaz, by his coldness of manner, re- pulsed the most flattering advances ; but he at length yielded, and became one of Mirabeau's most active co-operators. This did not occur till several months after, when Mirabeau had already acquired great ascendency in the assembly. In this little committee, I have seen very important measures put in train, and I may speak of them with the more freedom, be- cause I looked on rather than participated in them. I had never meddled with political matters, and felt no inclination to do so. I had, moreover, too high an opinion of the talents of Duroverai and Claviere, not to adopt, generally, their way of thinking. I was of great use in preventing collision between them, and in calming them when their prejudices, which I did not share, were opposed to each other. Durov- erai, with many amiable qualities, had unpleasant as- perities of temper, and often treated Mirabeau like a truant school-boy. Claviere, who looked forward to be minister of finance, was in haste to act, and did 78 RECOLLECTIONS not willingly lend himself to Duroverai's plan of uniting Mirabeau and Necker, and governing, by- such coalition^ the whole assembly. Duroverai was acquainted with M. Mallouet, who was intimate with M. Necker, and had rendered some services to the representatives of Geneva. We often dined at his house ; and on one occasion convinced him of the necessity of bringing about a conference between Mirabeau and M. Necker. Many objections were raised: "Can Mirabeau be trusted ?" — " Would he concert measures with the minister?" — "Would not M. Necker commit him- self?" Duroverai answered every objection, and M. de Montmorin was consulted. The conference took place, and Mirabeau, who had never before seen M. Necker, spoke of him, on his return, as a good kind of man, unjustly accused of possessing talent and depth of thought. This interview was not wholly unfruitful ; and the promise of an embassy to Con- stantinople, on the dissolution of the assembly, was held out to Mirabeau. The engagement was to be kept secret ; and I do not think that Mirabeau, who was the least discreet of men, communicated it to more than some seven or eight persons. However, the king's intentions, and those of M. Necker, were considered so consonant with public feeling, that a man who pledged himself to second them, did not contract an engagement contrary to the good of the nation. But OF MIRABEAU. 79 the turn that affairs subsequently took, and Mirabeau's great ascendency, soon raised him above an embassy, and placed him in a situation to dictate rather than have conditions imposed upon him. At this period, however, when the permanency of the states was not contemplated, much less the destruction of the mon- archy, the idea of an embassy pleased him much. He wanted to have me appointed secretary, and was already meditating the plan of an Ottoman encyclo- psedia. I ought, before I related this circumstance, to have mentioned Mirabeau's first triumph at the assembly of the tiers- etat. I was the more affected by it, be- cause it concerned Duroverai 5 and never was the most dreadful state of anxiety succeeded by more intense joy, than on this occasion. Duroverai was seated in the hall of the assembly, with some deputies of his acquaintance. He had occasion to pass to Mira- beau a note written with a pencil. M . . . ., who was already one of the most formidable declaimers of the assembly, saw this, and asked the member next him, who that stranger was, that was passing notes and interfering with their proceedings. The answer he received was a stimulus to his zeal. He rose, and in a voice of thunder, stated, that a foreigner, banished from his native country, and residing in England, from whose government he received a pension, was seated among themj, assisting at their debates, and 80 RECOLLECTIONS transmitting notes and observations to the deputies of their assembly. The agitation on every side of the hall, which succeeded this denunciation, would have appeared to me less sinister, had it been the forerunner of an earthquake. Confused cries were heard of, " Who is he ?''— " Where is he ?"— " Let him be pointed out!" Fifty members spoke at once ; but Mirabeau's powerful voice soon obtained silence. He declared that he would himself point out the foreigner, and denounce him to the assembly. * ' This exile," said he, " in the pay of England, is M. Duroverai, of Geneva ; and know, that this respec- table man, whom you have so wantonly insulted, is a martyr to liberty ; that, as attorney-general of the re- public of Geneva, he incurred the indignation of our visirs, by his zealous defence of his fellow citizens ; that a lettre de cachet^ issued by M. de Vergennes, deprived him of the office he had but too honourably filled ; and when his native city was brought under the yoke of the aristocracy, he obtained the honours of exile. Know further, that the crime of this en- lightened and virtuous citizen, consisted in having prepared a code of laws, in which he had abolished odious privileges."* * This is the speech as Mirabeau uttered it : — " I think with the gentleman who spoke last, that no individual, not a deputy, whether he be a foreigner or a native, ought to be seated among us. But the sacred ties of friendship, the still more holy claims OF MIUABEAU. 81 The impression produced by this speech, of which the above is only an abstract, was electrical. It was succeeded by a universal burst of applause. Nothing that resembled this force and dignity of elo- of humanity, and the respect 1 have for this assembly of patriots, and friends of peace, render it an imperious duty on my part, to separate from the simple question of order, the odious accusation which he has had the assurance to couple with it. He has dared to assert, that among the numerous strangers who are assisting at our proceedings, there is an exile ;— one who has taken refuge in England, and is in the pay of the king of Great Britain. Now this stranger, this exile, this refugee, is M. Duroverai, of Geneva, one of the most respectable citizens in the world. Never had freedom a more enlightened, a more laborious, or a more disin- terested advocate ! From his youth he was appointed by his countrymen to assist in the framing of a code of laws, intended to place the constitution of his country on a permanent basis. Nothing was more beautiful, nothing more philosophically politi- cal, than the law in favour of the natives. He was one of its framers. This law, so little known, yet so deserving of general attention, establishes the following principle : " That all repub- lics have perished, nay more, deserved to perish, for having op- pressed the people, and not having known that they who govern, can preserve their own liberty only by respecting that of their brethren." Elected attorney-general of Geneva, by the unani- mous voice of his fellow citizens, M. Duroverai incurred, from that moment, the hatred of the aristocrats. They swore his ruin ; and certain that this intrepid magistrate would never cease to employ the authority of his office in defence of the independence of his country, they succeeded in obtaining his L 83 RECOLLECTIONS cution had ever been heard before in the tumultuous assembly of the tiers-etat. Mirabeau was deeply moved by this first success. Duroverai was imme- diately surrounded by deputies, who, by their kind attentions, endeavoured to atone for the insult they had offered him. Thus, an accusation which had, at first, filled me with consternation, terminated so dismissal, through the interference of a despotic minister. But even in the midst of party hatred, and the intrigues of base fac- tions, M. Duroverai's character was respected even by calumny itself, whose foul breath never sullied a single action of his life. Included in the proscription which the aristocrats obtained from the destroyers of Genevese independence, he retired to England, and will, doubtless, never abdicate the honours of exile, until freedom shall once more resume her sway at Geneva. A large number of the most respectable citizens of Great Britain took up the cause of the proscribed republican, procured him the most flattering reception in their country, and induced their go- vernment to grant him a pension. This was a species of civic crown, awarded by that modern people, whom the tutelar ge- nius of the human race seems especially to have appointed to guard and officiate at the altars of freedom . . . . ! Behold then the stranger, the exile, the refugee, who has been denounced to you ! Formerly the persecuted man sought refuge at the altar, where he found an inviolable asylum, and escaped from the rage of the wicked. The hall in which we are now assem- bled, is the temple which, in the name of Frenchmen, you are raising to liberty ; and will you suffer it to be polluted by an outrage committed upon a martyr of liberty ?" — -Note by Du- mont. OF MIRABEAU. 83 much the more to my satisfaction, that the knowledge of this scene at Geneva could not fail to promote the recall of her exiled citizens. Of course this act of courage, this transport of justice and friendship was not lost upon us, and our connection was strengthen- ed by the ties of gratitude. If Mirabeau had always served the public cause with the same ardour as he did that of his friend — if he had shown a zeal equally noble, in putting a stop to the calumnies uttered from the tribune, he would have become the saviour of his country. I have but an imperfect recollection of the early proceedings of the assembly, during the dispute of the orders ; but I cannot forget the occasion on which a man, who afterwards acquired a fatal celebrity, first brought himself into notice. The clergy were endeavouring, by a subterfuge, to obtain a meeting of the orders ; and for this purpose deputed the Arch- bishop of Aix to the tiers-etat. This prelate expa- tiated very pathetically upon the distresses of the people, and the poverty of the country parishes. He produced a piece of black bread, which a dog would have rejected, but which the poor were obliged to eat or starve. He besought the tiers-etat to depute some members to confer with those deputed by the nobility and clergy, upon the means of better- ing the condition of the indigent classes. The tiers- etat perceived the snare, but dared not openly reject 84 RECOLLECTIONS the proposal, as it would render them unpopular with the lower classes ; when a deputy rose, and af- ter professing sentiments in favour of the poor still stronger than those of the prelate, adroitly threw doubts upon the sincerity of the intentions avowed by the clergy. " Go," said he to the archbishop, " and tell your colleagues^ that if they are so impatient to assist the suffering poor, they had better come hither and join the friends of the people. Tell them no longer to embarrass our proceedings with afTected delays ; — tell them no longer to endeavour, by unworthy means, to make us swerve from the resolutions we have taken ; but as ministers of religion — ^as worthy imitators of their masters — let them forego that luxury which surrounds them, and that splendour which puts indigence to the blush ; — let them resume the modesty of their origin — discharge the proud lackeys by whom they are attended — sell their superb equipages, and convert all their superfluous wealth into food for the indigent." This speech, which coincided so well with the pass- ions of the time, did not elicit loud applause, which would have been a bravado and out of place, but was succeeded by a murmur much more flattering: '' Who is he ?" was the general question ; but he was unknown ; and it was not until some time had elapsed, that a name was circulated which, three years later, OF MIRABEAU. 85 made France tremble. The speaker was Robespierre. Reybaz, who was seated next to me, observed, <* This young man has not yet practised ; he is too wordy, and does not know when to stop, but he has a store of eloquence and bitterness which will not leave him in the crowd." ' I had become acquainted with several deputies, and I often dined with the Bishop of Chartres, to whom I had been introduced by Brissot and Claviere. I used to meet, at the house of this prelate, his grand vicar, the Abbe Sieyes, but did not form any inti- macy with him. He was a very absent man, did not encourage familiarity, and was by no means of an open disposition. He gave his opinion, but without discussion ; and if any one raised an objection, he made no reply. His works had earned him a high reputation. He was considered the oracle of the tiers-etaty and the most formidable enemy of privi- leges. He was easily moved to anger, and seemed to entertain the most profound contempt for the pres- ent order of society. I thought this friend of liberty must of course like the English, and I sounded him on this subject ; but with surprise I discovered that he deemed the English constitution a mere piece of quackery, got up to impose upon the multitude. He seemed to listen to me as if I were uttering ab- surdities, while I detailed the divers modifications of this system, and the disguised though real checks 86 RECOLLECTIONS upon the three estates composing the legislature. All influence possessed by the crown was, in his eyes, venality, and opposition a mere trick. The only thing which he admired in England was trial by jury ; but he badly understood its principles, which is the case with every Frenchman, and had formed very erroneous notions on the subject. In a word, he considered the English as tyros in framing constitu- tions, and that he could give a much better one than theirs to France.* I inquired of the Bishop of Chartres and M. Las- seney concerning Sieyes's habits, studies, and the manner in which he had acquired his knowledge ; for it was easy to perceive that he was self-educated. * I must not forget one of the most characteristic traits with which my memory supplies me, relative to the Abbe Sieyes. One day, after having breakfasted at M. de Talleyrand's, we walked together for a considerable time in the garden of the Tuilleries. The Abbe Sieyes was more disposed to talk and more communicative than usual. In a moment of familiarity and effusion of heart, after having spoken of his studies, his works, and his manuscripts, he uttered these words, which struck me forcibly : " Politics are a science in which I think I am perfect." Had he ever measured the outline, or formed a con- ception of the extent and difficulty of a complete legislation, he would not have made such an assertion ; and presumption, in this case, as in any other, is the surest test of ignorance. — Note by Dvmont. OF MIHABEAU. 87 Nothing remained of his acquirements at his theo- logical seminary or at the Sorbonne. It appears that at Chartres, where he always spent the greater part of the summer, he lived like a recluse, because he did not like provincial society, and would put himself out of the way for nobody. . He read little, but medi- tated a great deal. The works he preferred were Rousseau's " Contrat Social,''^ the writings of Con- dillac, and Adam Smith's "Wealth of Nations." He had written much, but could not bear the work of revision. He fancied he did not possess what is called the knack of writing ; he envied Mirabeau's power and facility in this respect, and would willingly have confided his manuscripts to any one capable of giving them that last polish which he felt to be be- yond his power. He was little moved by the charms of women, which perhaps originated in a weak and sickly constitution, but was passionately fond of music, with the theory of which he was conversant, besides being an excellent performer. This is all I was able to collect concerning his character and habits. At the period I am speaking of, he might be considered the real leader of the tiers-etat, although no one made less display. But his work on the " Means of Exe- cution," &c. had pointed out the line of conduct to be pursued by the assembly, and it was he who exploded 88 RECOLLECTIONS the term tiers-etat to substitute in its stead that of the commons.^ The Bishop of Chartres was one of the prelates attached to the popular party ; that is to say, he was favourable to the union of the orders, the vote by in- dividual numbers, and a new constitution. He was neither a politician nor a man of profound learning ; but had much good faith and candour, and suspected nothing wrong. He could not imagine, in the tiers- etat^ any other views than the reform of abuses and the public good. A stranger to intrigue and sincere in his intentions, he followed the dictates of his con- science, and was acted upon by the purest sense of duty. In religion, as in politics, he was a believer, but tolerant, and was much rejoiced at seeing the removal of the protestant disabilities. He expected that the clergy would be called upon to make great sacrifices, but did not acticipate that they would be- come victims of the revolution. I saw him when the property of the church was declared national pro- perty. I found him, one day, with tears in his eyes, * Active and ardent in his party, he caused more to be done by others than he did himself. He laid down the plan of the battle, but remained in his tent during the combat. Girardin said of him, " He is to a party what a mole is to a grass-plot, he labours and raises it. " — Note by DumonU OF MIRABEAU. 89 discharging his servants, reducing his hospitable establishment, and preparing to sell his jewels for the liquidation of his debts. He assuaged his grief by entering with me into the most confidential details. His regret was not selfish ; but he accused himself of having submitted to be made a dupe of by the tiers- etatf whose interests he had embraced, and who, as soon as they became strong, had violated the engage- ments they had contracted during their weakness. It was indeed painful to an honest and well-meaning man, to have contributed to the success of so unjust a party; but never could blame attach less to any indi- vidual than to the Bishop of Chartres. I cannot but mention two anecdotes of this worthy prelate, which I never think of without admiration. During the first insurrections, he was deputed by the assembly to proceed to a village near Versailles, and endeavour to save the life of an unfortunate baker, named Tho- massin, against whom the people v;^ere furious. The venerable bishop had exhausted all the means of rea- son and persuasion, but to no purpose. He saw the ferocious savages seize the unhappy wretch to tear him to pieces. He had not an instant to lose. With- out hesitation he threw himself upon his knees in a deep mire, and called upon the assassins to kill him also, rather than force him to witness so atrocious a crime. The frenzied multitude of men and women, struck with respect at this action, drew back an M 90 RECOLLECTIONS instant, and gave the bishop time to help into his car- riage the wonnded and bleeding Thomassin. The other anecdote cannot be compared to this ; but it serves to show his excessive delicacy and high probity. At a period when pretended national re- forms had reduced so many individuals to distress, he had purchased, in the street, a gold box at a very low price. On his return home he perceived that the box was worth much more than he had paid for it. Uneasy at his purchase, and fearful of having taken an undue advantage of the wants of the seller, he did not rest until he had found him out and given him several louis-d'or in addition to what he had already paid, although he would have preferred to return the box, which, at that price, was no longer in unison with a situation he already perceived to be inevitable. " But," said he, ^^ if I return thebox, his wants may force him to sell it at a lower price than I first paid. This is but a small sacrifice, and it is perhaps the last I shall have it in my power to make.'' To con- clude what I have to say about this excellent man,— when, after his emigration, he was residing in a village in Germany, the Marquis of Lansdowne, who had known him at Spa, sent him, anonymously, a letter of credit for a hundred pounds. But he would not at first accept it, declaring that if he were unable to discharge such a debt, he would at least know his benefactor, for he did not choose to be exempted OF MIRABEAU. 91 from gratitude. I had the satisfection of being the interpreter of Lord Lansdowne's sentiments on this occasion, and of testifying to him, under his misfor- tunes, that respect and esteem still entertained to- wards him by every person who had known him dur- ing his prosperity. 92 RECOLLECTIONS CHAPTER IV. More than a month had elapsed in this state of suspense. Sieyes thought it was high time to send a positive summons to the nobility and clergy^ and, on their refusal, to proceed to the verification of powers, and put the commons into a state of activity. But this apparent loss of time had been turned to profit by the deputies of the tiers-etat. They had obtained public favour. The other two orders were divided among themselves, and the votes among the clergy nearly equalized. The people, who saw only the surface of things, considered the nobility and clergy as too obstinate to enter into any arrangement, they having already refused to assemble in the same hall as the deputies of the tiers-etat. The inhabitants of Versailles were in the habit of in- sulting, in the street and at the doors of the assembly, those whom they termed aristocrats ^ a term which, like all other party expressions, subsequently acquired a most direful influence. OF MIRABEAU. 93 What surprises me is, that there was no counter designation to distinguish the opposite party, then called the nation. The effect of the latter term, placed in the balance with the other, may readily be conceived. The people of Paris, so easy to govern and so indolent in their state of repose, became by degrees filled, like a balloon, with inflammable gas. Though the commons began already to feel their strength, there were many different opinions on the manner of bringing it into use, and on the name which should be taken by the assembly as a collective body. The audacity afterwards shown, was then only in em- bryo. Every man of forethought judged that the most important consequences would result from the decision of such a question. To call themselves a national assembly, would be to depreciate to the lowest degree the king, the nobles, and the clergy ; — it would, if the government displayed any vigour, prove the beginning of civil war. To vote them- selves simply an assembly of the commons would, on the other hand, be only expressing an undoubted fact, and would not force the nobles and clergy to join them ; it merely maintained the subdivisions of the assembly then existing. Several titles were proposed as modifications of these two ; for each member en- deavoured to conceal his views and pretensions ; and even Sieyes himself, who rejected every thing tend- 94 RECOLLECTIONS ing to maintain the orders, did not dare at once to propose the decisive term of national assembly. He first suggested an ambiguous denomination, imply- ing but not expressing that idea ; nor was it till after a debate of two or three days, that he ventured to pass the Rubicon, and get the motion made by a deputy called Legrand. There was an immediate and gene- ral call for putting it to the vote, and this voting, which lasted till very late at night, had something sombre and awful. The galleries had, with great difiiculty, been forced to absolute silence. There were eighty votes against the denomination of na- tional assembly, and nearly five hundred in its fa- vour. I have reserved, to mention separately, the part taken by Mirabeau in this debate. The question had already been discussed in our little society. The danger of a scission with the court and the nobles ; the evil of opening the states -general by a rupture between the orders ; the necessity of recurring to violent measures to support this first step and over- come resistance ; all these considerations were duly weighed ; but what had still more influence over us, was tTiat we bore in mind the English constitution, which we took for our model, and the division of the legislature into two branches appeared to us far preferable to a single assembly over whom OF MIHABEAU. 95 there could be no check. Thougli we ultimately adopted this opinion, it was no easy matter to get Mirabeaii to support it as his own. It was against the popular torrent ; and it required courage to com- mence a determined and systematic opposition to Sieyes, the Bretons and the Palais Royal, and brave calumnies, clamours, and suspicions which such an apparent deviation from democratic principles might produce. But Mirabeau possessed, in a high degree, the courage produced by excitement, and was en- dowed with.great presence of mind. He had no ob- jection to an opposition of eclat; was not pleased with Sieyes, who did not flatter him ; and had suffi- cient confidence in himself to think, that he could redeem his popularity, should he be deprived of it by the opinion he was about to advocate. In pre- senting his motion, he paid many flattering compli- ments to the dominant party, abused the privileged orders, and concluded by proposing that the commons should be designated by the title of assembly of the French people. This motion, not very well understood at first, was not strongly opposed ; but when Mallouet, who passed for a ministerial, was seen to support it, and was bring- ing the moderates to his way of thinking, the popular party, in alarm, commenced a violent attack on Mira- beau. The word people, which had at first appeared synonymous with the word . nation, was now placed yo RECOLLECTIONS in another light, as having been invented to form opposition with the nobility and clergy who were not the people f and pretended to be above them. Invectives were not spared : the author of the motion w^as termed an aristocrat in disguise, who had insidi- ously endeavoured, by this title, to villify the true representatives of the French nation. The tempest, increasing by degrees, seemed to burst w^ith tenfold fury. I was then in one of the galleries talking to Lord Elgin, a young Scottish nobleman who much admired Mirabeau's motion. Indignant at the ab- surdities^ uttered about the word people^ I was unable to resist the pleasure of writing what I should ray- self have said, had I been a member of the assembly. After discussing the question, I wrote with a pencil a sort of apostrophe intended as a peroration. It was addressed to those pretended friends of liberty who fancied themselves degraded at being called deputies of the people. This sketch, very rapidly written, was not wanting in force and elevation. Lord Elgin begged I would permit him to read it, and as I had no ultimate view in writing it, I showed him the paper, with which he appeared much pleased. The dinner hour suspended the sitting, I dined at Mirabeau's. Duroverai reproached him with the weakness of his speech, and proved to him that he had neglected the strongest and most convincing argu- ments. I showed him my sketch, and the peroration OF MIRABEAU. . 97 appeared to him so conclusive, that he instantly de- termined, he said, "to throw that burning tile at their heads.'* "This is impossible," said I, " for I showed it to Lord Elgin, who was next to me in the gallery." " And what difference does that make?" replied Mirabeau ; ^^ had you shown it to the whole world, I should certainly quote it as the passage best adapted to the subject." Duroverai, who had an extraordinary desire that this motion should succeed, began to write a refuta- tion of all the arguments used against it. Mirabeau copied as fast as he could, and the result was a tole- rably complete oration, for the delivery of which, it was only necessary to be allowed to speak. He found much dijQiculty in obtaining a hearing; but the gal- leries were so fond of listening to him, that the assembly durst not persist in a refusal. The exordium which I had written, excited a tolerable degree of attention — the argumentative part passed off with alternate murmurs and applause — but the peroration, which he delivered in a voice of thunder, and which was heard with a species of terror, produced an ex- traordinary effect. It was succeeded, not by cries, but by convulsions of rage. The agitation was gene- ral, and a storm of invectives burst upon the speaker from all parts of the hall. But he stood, calm and unmoved, whilst I, the poor author of this unhappy attempt, remained petrified in a corner, lamenting N 98 RECOLLECTIONS an error of judgment so fatal to my friend and cause.* * The following is the peroration. " I persevere in my mo- tion and in its only expression that has called forth animadver- sion. — I mean the denomination of French people. I adopt it, I defend it, and I proclaim it for the very reason urged in objection to it.— Yes ! it is because the term people is not suffi- ciently respected in France, that it is cast into the shade and covered with the rust of prejudice ;— because it presents an idea alarming to our pride and revolting to our vanity — and is pro- nounced with contempt in the chamber of the aristocrats. It is for these very reasons, gentlemen, that I could wish (and we ought to impose the task upon ourselves), not only to elevate but to ennoble the name, and thus render it respectable to min- isters, and dear to every heart. If this title were not, in fact, already ours, it ought to be selected from amongst every other, and its adoption considered the most valuable opportunity of serving that people from whom we derive our authority — that people whose representatives we are— whose rights we defend — and yet, whose name, as forming our own denomination and title, would seem to raise the blush of shame on our cheeks. — Oh ! how should I exult if, by the choice of such a title, firmness and courage were restored to a trodden-down people ! My mind is elevated by the contemplation in futurity, of the happy results which may proceed from the use of this name ! The people will look up to us, and we to the people ; and our title will remind us of our duties and of our strength. Under the shelter of a name which neither startles nor alarms us, we can sow and cultivate the seeds of liberty ; — we can avert those fatal blasts that would nip it in the bud ; and if we so protect its OF MIRABEAU. 99 When the tumult had somewhat subsided, Mira- beau, in a grave and solemn tone, thus addressed the president: ''Sir, I deposit upon your table the growth, our descendants will sit under the vivifying shade of its wide-spreading branches. — Representatives cf tlie people ! vouchsafe to answer me ! Will you go and tell your constituents that you have rejected this name o^ people? — that if you are not ashamed of them, you have, at all events, endeavoured to elude using their name, which does not appear to you a sufficiently flattering title ? — that you want a more fastuous denomination than they could confer upon you ? Gentlemen ! do you not per- ceive that the title of representatives of the people is absolutely necessary, inasn;iuch as it will insure to you the attachment of the people, that imposing mass, without which you would be nothing but single individuals — nothing but slender reeds which might easily be broken one by one ? Do you not see that you require the word people, because it shows the people that you have united your fate to theirs ; and it will teach them to centre in you all their thoughts and all their hopes ! — The Batavian he- roes who founded the liberties of their country, were more able tacticians than we are. They adopted the denomination ofgneux or beggarly fellows ; — they chose this title, because their tyrants had endeavoured to cast it upon them as a terra of opprobrium ; and this designation, by attaching to their party that numerous and powerful class so degraded by the despotism of the aristoc- racy, was, at the same time, their glory, their strength, and the pledge of their success. The friends of freedom select the name which is most useful to them, and not that by which they are the most flattered. They are called remonsirators in America, shepherds \n Switzerland, and gueux in the Low Countries. 100 RECOLLECTIONS speech which has elicited such strong marks of dis- approbation, because it has not been properly under- stood. I consent to be judged, on the merits of its contents, by all the friends of liberty." So saying he left the hall amid threats and furious imprecations. I called on Mirabeau an hour after. I was over- come by feelings of dread and disappointment, but I found him triumphant, and reading his speech to some inhabitants of Marseilles who were expressing the most enthusiastic admiration of it. I must con- fess that he paid back to the assembly the slights he had received from them. He compared them to wild asses, who had obtained from nature no other faculty than that of kicking and biting. " They did not frighten me, my dear friend," said he in a pro- phetic tone, " and in a week you shall see me more powerful than ever. They must come to me, when they find themselves about to be overwhelmed by the tempest they have themselves raised. Regret not, therefore, the events of this evening. The thinkers will see something very profound in my motion. As for the fools, I despise them too much to hate them, and will save them in spite of themselves." With They consider the terms of reproach applied to them by their enemies, as their proudest boast ; for they deprive such terms of all power of humiliation, the moment they have succeeded in coupling them with honourable deeds ! — Note by the Genevese Editor. OF MIRABEAU. 101 all this excess of pride and temporary courage, he had not^sufficient firmness to attend at the call of the house. He did not, therefore, vote upon the ques- tion ; and thus it was that his name did not appear on the list of the eighty deputies held up, to the people, as traitors sold to the aristocracy. Even his popularity did not suffer at the Palais Royal, whilst Mallouet, Mounier and several others who had maintained the same opinion less openly, were de- livered over to popular censure. On the following day, when Sieyes appeared in the hall, all the members, from a spontaneous feeling of respect, rose to receive him, and applause thun- dered from every side. ''How contemptible!" said Mirabeau. ^^Do they. imagine that all is over? I should not be surprised if civil war were the fruit of their wise decree.'' The nobles were confounded at the audacity of the tiers-etat. They who had access to the king, told him that all would be lost, if he did not oppose this usurpation on the part of the commons. The debates in the chamber of the nobility, were scenes of infuriated madness. The decree of the tiers-etat was termed an outrage, treachery, high treason. The frenzy was at its height ; and the king ought to have called all his faithful subjects to defend him, put himself at the head of his troops, ordered the seditious to be arrested, and dissolved the assembly. 102 RECOLLECTIONS The cause of the events which followed, was to be traced to the excitement of party spirit, and to the violent language which resulted from it. It is necessary to have witnessed this ferment to compre- hend what followed. Many historical facts, stripped of the circumstances by which they were prepared, seem inexplicable. The atmosphere at Versailles was dark and scorching ; and the explosion which was expected to follow, must needs be terrible. At this juncture, Duroverai conceived a plan which he mentioned to M. Mallouet, but feared to confide to the indiscretion of Mirabeau, in whom neither party had any confidence. This plan was, that the king should sit as the provisional legislator of France, and annul the decree of the commons which constituted them a national assembly ; but that, at the same time, he should order the nobles and clergy to join the tiers-etat for the joint verifi- cation of their powers, and proceed in concert for the future. The object of this sitting was, therefore, to do by royal authority that which the commons had effected by setting aside the king's power: and to decree the union of the nobles and clergy with the tiers-etat, in order that this union should emanate from the king, and not from the commons. This was intended only to save appearances, for the re- sult would be the same. But by this measure, the nobility would not appear at the assembly under OF MIRABEAU. 103 circumstances humiliating to their pride, and it would, moreover, put an end to those violent disputes between the three orders, which could only end either in the triumph of the commons, by means of a popular movement, or in the dissolution of the assembly, which would be the precursor of a civil war. Mallouet entered warmly into Duroverai's plan, and brought M. Necker to the same way of thinking ; but there was no direct communication between the latter and Duroverai. The plan of the royal session was adopted by the king, but M. Necker's arguments in its favour were made subservient to a modification which certainly he never intended. After an animated discussion in the council, the Count d'Artois and his party triumphed ; and it was resolved that the decree of the commons should be annulled, but without enjoin- ing a union of the orders. Thus was the real object of the measure done away, and nothing but its form remained. M. Necker had aimed at combining democracy with royalty ; but this measure had only invested aristocracy with despotism. The forms of authority which, with propriety, might be used to ennoble a necessary act of condescension, became revolting, when employed in an act of violence which the king had no means of following up. Not but the royal session in itself, when fairly considered, 104 RECOLLECTIONS will be found to contain the strongest concessions which monarch ever made to his subjects; and which, at any other period, would have called forth their warmest gratitude/ When a prince is powerful, every thing he grants is a gift, every thing he does not take, is a favour; but if he be weak, that which he grants is only a debt due — that which he refuses to comply with, an injustice. * The commons determined to be a national assem- bly. Nothing less would satisfy them. If the government chose to oppose this, they should have prepared the means of doing so ; but to annul the decrees, and excite popular ferment, without taking a single precaution, without even having a party in the assembly, was an act of madness which led to the overthrow of the monarchy. Nothing is more dangerous than to stimulate a weak man to acts be- yond his strength ; for when resistance to his will has shown his real weakness, he has no resource left. Thus was the royal authority degraded, and even the people discovered the secret of the king's want of power. The measures attendant upon the royal session were as badly combined as if they had related to the acts of unruly school-boys. The hall of the states-gene- ral was closed for three or four days, A display of soldiers imparted to this measure the appearance of OF MlltABEAU. 105 violence. The deputies, driven from their hall at the point of the bayonet, met in the famous Jeu-de- Paumef or Tennis-court, where they swore never to separate, until they had obtained a constitution. Even the eighty members forming the minority who had opposed the decree, took this oath ; for being- ignorant of what was going on, they imagined that the king was about to dissolve the states-general ; andMirabeau, then labouring under the same mistake, spoke so energetically against such dissolution, that even his greatest enemies began to look upon him as a giant, whose strength, in the present crisis of aifairs, had become necessary to them. This scene, — where fear was masked by an appearance of bold determination — where the most timid became the most violent — must have been witnessed to convey an adequate conception of the evils it produced in the course of the revolution. The alarmed deputies were for ever alienated from the king's government ; the oath was a tie of honour, and from that day, the deputies of the tiers-etat were confederated against the royal authority. This appearance of persecu- tion redoubled the popularity of the commons, and the Parisians were alarmed at their danger. The Palais-Royal was a scene of absolute frenzy ; and dark rumours seemed to menace the lives of some of the most distinguished individuals at court. In a hazy horizon, objects cannot be seen as they really are. 106 RECOLLECTIONS The alarmed populace became suspicious and active, nor could any subsequent conciliatory measures of the court restore the public confidence. Such was the true origin of that burning excitement so carefully kept alive by two classes of men, the factious and the timid. The day after the meeting at the Jeu-de-Paume^ the deputies, still excluded from their hall, in which preparations were being made for the king's sitting, presented themselves at the door of several churches, but were not admitted. The sight of the represen- tatives of the nation thus seeking an asylum and finding none, increased the popular discontent. At length they entered the church of St Louis, where a doubt- ful majority of the clergy, headed by the Archbishop of Vienne, the Archbishop of Bordeaux, and the Bishop of Chartres, joined the deputies of the tiers- etat amid transports which the approaching danger rendered sincere. Greetings, applauses, pathetic speeches, and even tears, announced that all were united heart and hand against a common peril ; and the conduct of the clergy on this occasion was the more meritorious because it was voluntary. Who would have anticipated at this period, that very shortly after, an ecclesiastic would be unable to ap- pear in public without suffering the most degrading insults! On the day of the royal session, I went to the pal- OF MIRABEAU. 107 ace to witness the splendid pageant. I well remember the hostile and triumphant looks of many individuals, in their way to the chateau. They thought their victory sure. I saw the king's ministers, whose emo- tion, though they aifected unconcern, was but too apparent. The attitude of the Count d'Artois was haughty ; the king seemed pensive and sad. The crowd was great, and the silence profound. When the king got into his carriage, there were rolling of drums and flourishes of trumpets, but not a sign of approbation from the people, and fear alone prevented an explosion of popular discontent. At length the vast procession began to move. The royal household and its officers, the guards, infantry and cavalry, proceeded towards the hall of the states-general, in which the three orders assembled were defying each other with looks of mute indignation, and impatiently awaiting the result of this important day. Never had passions so violent, and so diametrically opposed to each other, been before pent up in so small a space. The ceremony was precisely the same as on the open- ing of the states- general, but what a difference was there in the feelings of the assembly ! The day of the first ceremony was a national festival, — the, re- generation of political freedom ; but now, the same pomp which had delighted every eye, was covered with a veil of terror. The sumptuous dresses of the nobles, the magnificence of regal state, and the 108 EECOLLECTIONS splendour of royal pageantry, seemed the accompani- ment of a funeral procession. I was not present at the sitting, and have obtained my knowledge of what passed from the recital of others ; but I know, that when the king and nobles had withdrawn, the comnioifs attempted to disguise their consternation. They began to perceive the consequences of the decree they had so unheedingly promulgated, and found that they had now no other alternative than to subjugate the monarchy, or basely recall their act. No one had yet attempted to speak, when a message from the king ordered them to separate. It was then that Mirabeau uttered those famous words which form an epoch in the revo- lution, and which roused the sunken spirits of the assembly.* The deliberation assumed a decisive character, and the royal sitting was termed a bed of justice. This called to mind how the parliaments had always acted on such emergencies — how often the latter had dared to annul the orders given to them by the king in person, and succeeded, by their perseverance, in triumphing over the court. Before the deputies separated, they confirmed their decree, and renewed the oath of the Jeu-de-Paume; and scarcely had the king entered the palace, when the proceedings of the royal session were cancelled. * " Go, tell your master that we are here by the power of the people, and nothing but the force of bayonets shall drive lis hence !" OF MIRABBAU. 109 One circumstance which encouraged the resistance of the deputies, was that M. Necker had not attended the king on this occasion. He w^as the only minister not present, and his absence seemed to mark his disapprobation of the measure. His popularity thence prodigiously increased, and the people con- sidered him as their safe-guard against the storm. The assembly, who afterwards became jealous of the people's affection for him, because they wanted to engross it all to themselves, felt it their interest at that period, to make him a public idol, and, with his name, to counterbalance the court. His absence, however, originated in a very simple cause. There was a certain M. de Riol, who called himself a Chevalier and wore some Swedish order,— a very significant personage, who contrived to thrust him- self every where. Although a subaltern, he lived on terms of great familiarity with M. Necker. We had become acquainted with this individual, who called upon us on the very day of the royal session. He assured us that he had found M. Necker on the point of setting out for M. de Montmorin's, in order to proceed to the palace, and accompany the king to the assembly ; but that he (Riol) conjured him to do no such thing, as he would inevitably have to share in the odium of the measure, and would be un- able to do any good in future. Riol added, that he had carried his zeal so far as to tell Necker he would 110 RECOLLECTIONS rather break one of his arms or legs, than suifer him to proceed; and that Madame Necker, in great agitation, having joined her entreaties to his, M. Necker at last yielded. I have no reason either to doubt or to confirm this fact ; but if it be true, M. Necker suffered his determination, on so important a matter, to be influenced by a very insignificant per- sonage.* It is, however, certain, that a witless man often communicates his fears in a more persuasive manner than an intellectual one ; and his gestures sometimes produce a stronger effect than either rea- son or eloquence. But surely M. Necker was not to blame for not sanctioning, with his presence, a measure in furtherance of which his speeches had been insidiously used, after changing the vital part of the plan he had proposed. Mirabeau was made acquainted by Claviere, who could not keep a secret, with the true origin of the royal session. He complained of it to me in terms of indignation. " Duroverai," said he, ^^did not think me worthy of being consulted. He looks upon * Impartiality forces us to state that Madame de Stael, in her *• Considerations on the French Revolution," (Chap 20) attri- butes M. Necker's absence to a determination previously taken, in consequence of the changes made in his plan ; and according to the same authority, M. Necker replied to the wish, expressed by the court, that he should be present at the royal session, by tendering his resignation. OF MIRABEAU. Ill me, I know, as a madman with lucid intervals. But I could have told him beforehand what would be the fate of his plan. It is not wdth such an elastic tem- perament as that of the French, that these brutal forms must be resorted to. And what kind of man is this M. Necker, that he should be trusted with such means ? You might as well make an issue in a wooden leg as give him, advice ; for he certainly could not follow it.'' /ind getting warmer as he proceeded, he conclu^led with these remarkable words, " It is thus that kings are led to the scaf- fold:' 112 RECOLLECTIONS CHAPTER V. At this period great agitation commenced among the people. I have no doubt that there were meet- ings to promote insurrection, paid declaimers, a great deal of money distributed, and that the primary agents of the directors at Versailles, were more nu- merous among the minority of the nobles, than in the tiers-etat. I will not, indeed, venture to assert, that I am acquainted with particulars ; but I firmly believe that the deputies of the tiers-etat acted, at this momentous crisis, with very little concert among themselves. There was a commencement of organi- zation only among the deputies from Brittany, who had already been somewhat drilled into the tactics of popular assemblies, by their public disputes in their native province. So far as I was able to ascertain, the Breton club, which was acquiring great impor- tance, had been got up by the minority of the nobles ; but there will be no complete history of the revolu- tion, until some member of this party publishes the OF MIRABEAU. 113 secret memoirs of its transactions. I well remember an anecdote of that period. I one day encountered Sieyes, who had just quitted a meeting composed of Bretons, and of members belonging to the minority of the nobles. He mentioned no names, but said, *^ I will return to those men no more. Their poli- tics are too cavernous, and they propose crimes instead of expedients." Duport and the Lameths had the reputation of having machinated the revolution of Paris. It was easy for the Duke of Orleans to put the centre dis- tricts in motion. He was like a spider in the midst of his web. But I know nothing of these events, except through public channels. Mirabeau was not connected with them. His fiery and ungovernable temper disqualified him for coalitions. His ideas were not sufiiciently connected, nor did he inspire sufficient confidence to become a chief, and he had too much pride to play a subordinate part. He therefore remained independent ; envious to an ex- cess of every rising influence, epigrammatic by wholesale, a retail dealer in flattery, and alienated from his colleagues by his contempt for some, and his jealousy of others. I often went to Paris with him, and I am convinced that he had no share in the rising of the Parisians. They who would account for the French revolu- tion, by attributing it to concealed machinators; are p 114 RECOLLECTIONS mistaken. Such machinators did certainly not pro- duce the public feeling ; they only took advantage of it. It is true, that they excited and directed it ; but it is absurd to suppose that any conspirators, at this period, could have caused so sudden and violent an impulse ; — one, in short, so vast as to include, simultaneously, the whole French nation. Every one was in motion at Paris; even the coldest and most calculating participated in the phrenzy of the moment. The whole popular mass was in a state of extreme caldescence. A word from the Palais Royal, an accidental movement, the merest trifle, in fine, might cause a general commotion. In such a state of things, tumult begets tumult, and the disease of the evening is aggravated next day. Although the details are somewhat eifaced from my recollection, I yet well remember the interval between the royal session and the mournful appari- tion of the king, at the assembly, when he came to deliver himself up, or rather to place his person in deposit there, after the capture of the Bastille. I recollect this period as one of trouble, confusion, and obscurity. False alarms were given, people knew and did not know, orders were given and re- voked, every thing was attempted to be guessed at and explained, and a motive was attributed to the most indiiferent actions. The palace was watched ; spies were placed every where, and each trifle was OF MIRABEAU. 115 made of consequence. There were insurrections at Versailles, originating, not in a preconcerted plan, but in a suspicious and irascible disposition. Mean- time, the three orders remained divided, and had assumed hostile attitudes. The court sent troops to quell these insurrections. Versailles was filled with foreign soldiers, and military measures seemed every where adopted. There were whispers of a change of ministry, and the new names mentioned did not tend to tranquillize the commons. So much bustle on the part of the court, could be intended only to enforce obedience to the royal session, either by re- moving the assembly to a greater distance from Paris, its proximity to which was dangerous, or by dissolving it altogether, if this could be done without the risk of a civil war, the idea of which made the king shudder. But whatever were the intentions of the court or of those who conducted its aifairs, such intentions were certainly not in unison with those of the king; there was an alarming secrecy in the whole conduct of the court party; secret prepa- rations were discovered, and plans seemed to be in a course of development, but no result was ever per- ceived. Such conduct raised general indignation, and the fermentation at Paris was dreadful. Reybaz and Claviere returned from Paris, and assured us that it would be impossible to contain the 116 RECOLLECTIONS people. They urged Mirabeau to stand forward upon this occasion. " If/' said they, '^ the tiers-etat were wrong in voting themselves a national assembly, still it is a measure which cannot now be recalled, without degrading the representatives of the people, and affording a complete triumph to the insolence of the aristocracy. Should the states- general be dis- solved, a national bankruptcy must be the inevitable consequence. The people will rejoice at this, because the government will reduce the taxes ; there will be then no further difficulty, and the cause of freedom will be lost." I am certain, that at this period, the creditors of the state, a very numerous and active body, who were all powerful at Paris, were acting in direct opposition to the court, because they perceived but too plainly, that if the government declared a national bankruptcy, the deficit would be thought no more of, and the words states- general j, constitutiony and sovereignty of the people , totally forgotten. It was at length discovered, that agents of the court were sounding the regiments recently arrived at Versailles, and likewise the French guards, in order to ascertain how far their fidelity to the govern- ment might be depended on. There was now no time to be lost, and it was thought necessary that the king himself should be warned of these manoeuvres, the object and danger of which were probably con- OF MIRABEAU. 117 cealed from him. These points were introduced by Mirabeau into his famous speech upon the removal of the troops. Tliis speech was a sort of abstract of every thing that had been said upon the subject, during our private conferences. I wrote it, arid Duroverai drew up the resolutions containing the proposed measure. One of these resolutions called upon the king to establish a militia of citizens. It was the only one rejected by the assembly, though, perhaps, it was the most important. Duroverai saw that if the people took up arms, the royal authority would be annihilated; but if the king himself armed the citizens, such a choice of men and oJBicers might be made, that this institution, like the English mili- tia, would be a bulwark against insurrection, without alarming the advocates of liberty. The last of these resolutions was to present an address to the king, relative to the removal of the troops. A committee was appointed to draw up this address; for the assembly sent every thing to committees, in order to give as little importance as possible to individuals. But as writing in common is the most difficult of all conjunct functions, Mirabeau was requested by the committee to make a draft of the address. Anima- ted by the success of the speech, and full of the sub- ject, encouraged, moreover, by the flattery and aifectionate caresses of Mirabeau, whom the applause of the assembly had filled with delight, I wrote with 118 RECOLLECTIONS great ease and rapidity, in the interval between one sitting and another, the address to the king.* I remember a circumstance which amused me at the time. Garat, who was a member of the commit- tee, came to ask the hour at which Mirabeau could attend. I was then in the heat of composition, and he was obliged to elude replying, by shuffling and giving an oblique turn to the question. Next day, at M. de la Rochefoucauld's, another member of the committee, whose name I forget, spoke greatly in favour of this address, and praised the modesty of Mirabeau, who had consented to all the alterations demanded, as if, in this composition, he had foregone his vanity of authorship. I know not whether my self-love were more sensible on the occasion than his, but I certainly thought that the alterations had not improved the address. Duroverai kept the original for a long time, a thing I did not even think of. Though flattered by the applause bestowed upon this production, I was not silly enough to fancy it a masterpiece. I considered that its greatest merit arose from the circumstance which occasioned it. There was dignity and simplicity in the style, with as much oratorical eloquence as was consistent with the respect due to the monarch, and with the dig- nity of the assembly who addressed him. The * Vide Appendix, No. 1. OF MIHABEAU. 119 expressions were measured and unctuous, and the whole was in good keeping with the subject. Mira- beau approved of it the more because he felt himself unable to write in this particular way : ^^ My style readily assumes force," said he, ^^and I have a com- mand of strong expressions ; but, if I want to be mild, unctuous, and measured, I become insipid, and my flabby style makes me sick." Had I afterwards discovered any faults in this ad- dress, I must not have pointed them out to Mirabeau ; for he attached himself so strongly to his adopted children that he felt for them the affection of a pa- rent.* If the honour of these compositions had belonged to another, it must not be thought that the unknown author would have derived no satisfaction from them. The approbation of a circle of some half dozen friends is always flattering, without including those whom they may have let into the secret. I have not to ac- cuse myself of any indiscretion of this kind ; or, * When T worked for Mirabeau, I seemed to feel the pleasure of an obscure individual who had changed his children at nurse, and introduced them into a great family. He would be obliged to respect them, although he was their father. Such was the case with my writings. When Mirabeau had once adopted them, he would have defended them even against me ; more than that ^he would have allowed me to admire them, as an act of esteem and friendship for himself. — Note by Dumont. 120 RECOLLECTIONS strictly speaking, perhaps, my own self-love may have been the best guardian of the secret 5 for the instant I had been tempted to reveal it^ I should have fancied that I perceived an expression of doubt and incredulity upon every countenance. But in sober earnest, I can declare that, knowing such a proceed- ing to be repugnant to delicacy and friendship, the temptation never once occurred to me. I was not long in perceiving that Mirabeau's friends considered Duroverai and me as his writers. His life of agitation, his being much out, his occupations at the assembly, his committees, his loss of time, and his taste for pleasure, prevented those who knew him from considering him the author of the writings which appeared in his name. At a later period, a greater number of workmen were added to this manufactory. But when I was designated in the ^cts of the Jlpos- ties, and other pamphlets, at one of Mirabeau's au- thors, I no longer felt the same pleasure in writing for him ; and this circumstance determined me, as I shall hereafter explain, to return to England. The king's answer to the address was not satisfac- tory. His personal intentions were thought good, and he was supposed to be led astray by deception practised upon him. There was a plan in a course of development, whose extent and object were not known. But the threats of certain subordinates, their insulting looks, apparent preparations for a OF MIRABEAU. 121 coup d'etat, the movements of the troops, nocturnal visits to the guard houses by officers of rank, secret councils at court, to which M. Necker was not sum- moned, and a thousand particulars of the same de- scription, constituted the events of every day. These were again exaggerated and distorted by the general uneasiness and alarm. No one was yet bold enough to speak of the conspiracy of the court — this name was not applied till after the victory ; — but the con- sternation was general. The approach of the troops and the dismissal of M. Necker, brought on the in- surrection of Paris. I say nothing of the public events of which I was not an eye-witness. I remained at Versailles with the national assembly, whose in- trepidity was not to be shaken by the approach of danger. It was no longer divided into parties ; all had one unanimous feeling. The dissolution of the states- general appeared to all pregnant with the greatest danger. The sitting of Monday, the 13th of July, was awfully calm. There were a thousand confused re- ports relative to what had occurred at Paris on the preceding day. It was known that the people had repulsed the regiment of the prince of Lambesc, and driven it back to the Tuilleries : that the French guards had joined the people, and had been engaged with the Swiss ; that the populace were arming, that they had broken open the armourer's shops, and Q 122 RECOLLECTIONS closed the city gates , and that Paris, in a word, was in open insurrection. Mirabeau told us that he had a list of proscriptions 5 that Sieyes, Chapelier, La- fayette, Lameth, himself, and several others, were to be arrested ; that they had been put upon their guard and intended to pass the night at the assembly, where they should consider themselves safer than in their own houses. The assembly continued its sitting throughout the night, and in the intervals between the deputations dispatched to the king to beseech him to withdraw the troops whose presence had inflamed the metropolis ; they discussed, if I remember rightly, a declaration of the rights of man, presented by Lafay- ette. In his answer to the deputation, the king stated that his heart was lacerated ; that it was impossible the orders he had given, for the restoration of the public peace, could have led to the rising of Paris. But he spoke not of withdrawing the troops, and the individuals by whom he was surrounded, were not calculated to restore confidence. The plan of the court seemed to continue its progress, when the as- sembly made a last effort, and on the Tuesday morn- ing sent a more solemn deputation to the king. Mi- rabeau, with a voice rendered hoarse by watching, fatigue, and uneasiness, said a few words, which were rapturously applauded. It is a well known fact that the troops at Versailles hac} declined obedience ; and that after the fall of OF MIRABEALT. 123 the Bastille, and the metamorphosis^ which, in two days, had changed the peaceful citizens of Paris into an army of two hundred thousand men, the king had no other alternative than to unite himself to the na- tional assembly, and seek his safety among its members. What a contrast, then, did the sitting of the 18th of June form with those which had preceded it ! The king announced his intention of going to Paris forth- with. Mirabeau, astonished at this resolve, and still more so at its subsequent execution, afterwards said to me, ^* He must be a bold mortal who advised this step. Had the king not followed the advice, Paris was lost to him for ever. Two or three days later, and he would have been unable to return thither." I attribute these words to the singular sagacity with which Mirabeau was gifted. He knew the Duke of Orleans's party, and might have thought that this prince would have taken advantage of the circum- stances to obtain possession of the metropolis. If the Duke's party did indeed form any such plan, it was frustrated by the sudden appearance of the king, who, thereby, in some degree, revived the almost extinct affection of the Parisians. It seemed as though the two hundred thousand men under arms had concerted among themselves to receive him with the most appalling solemnity. In proceeding to the Hotel-de-Ville, he heard no other cry than, *^ long live the assembly !" but on his return, as if the chas- 124 RECOLLECTIONS tisement had been severe enough, he was saluted by acclamations of "long live the king!" The king was a man of w^eak character, but by no means timid ; of which his conduct on this day fur- nished a striking illustration. It required a great de- gree of courage to go into the midst of an enraged pop- ulace, w^ho seemed conferring a favour on their mo- narch by receiving him within the walls of his own capital. When M. Bailly told him that Henry IV. had conquered his people, but the people had now conquered their king, he turned round and said in a whisper to the Prince of Beauveau, "Perhaps I had better not hear that." The Prince of Beauveau made a sign, in reply, and the orator proceeded. The death of the Marquis of Mirabeau, the author of " The Friend of Man,^^ obhged Mirabeau to absent himself from the assembly for a few days. This occurred during the motions for the recall of M. Necker, and against the new ministers. M. Ber- trand de Molleville, who has enriched his pretended <^ Annals of the Revolution" with all his own preju- dices, has attributed Mirabeau's silence on these oc- casions to profound intentions. Mirabeau had made me promise to employ my lei- sure time in writing for him a sketch of the revolu- tion. I began it at Paris, but I had great difficulty in collecting facts, reconciling contradictions, redu- cing exaggeration, and separating truth from false- OF MTRABEAU. 125 hood. The causes of events were always hidden, the secret councils of the court unknown. Much might always be urged on both sides of the question, and it might be maintained with perhaps equal plau- sibility, that there was a court conspiracy, and that there was not. It appeared to me necessary to dis- tinguish the acts of the king from those of his min- isters, and to represent him as having concurred in a plan of which the most vital points had been con- cealed from him. Even with regard to Paris itself, the more the scene was extended, the more confused were the details. Some described to me the capture of the Bastille as a wonderful achievement ; others reduced it to a mere nothing, and I really knew not what conclusion to come to with regard to Launay and his invalids. The crimes of the period appeared to me the mere effect of sudden excitement, but every one seemed to believe that they were mixed up with treachery. Persuaded at last that the secret history of no great political event was ever well known even at the period of its occurrence, I wrote, in the best way I could, the account contained in the nineteenth letter of Miraheau to his constituents, in which he made some alterations, and struck outsome express- ions of doubt, because the court conspiracy was more manifest to him than to me. This letter was prodi- giously successful. 126 RECOLLECTIONS CHAPTER VI. All Mirabeau's letters to his constituents, begin- ning from the eleventh, were written by either Du- roverai or me. Mirabeau, who was very desirous of keeping us at Paris during the session of the Nation- al Assembly, proposed a literary partnership which oifered a good chance of profit. This was to write a regular journal in his name, the profits of which, after deducting the expenses, should be equally di- vided between himself, le Jay the bookseller, Durov- erai and me. We were to include in the outgoings of the paper a reasonable monthly sum for our current expenses. The title of the journal was " Le Courrier de ProvenceP It was announced in the nineteenth letter to which. I alluded at the end of the last chap- ter ; and although the subscription was high, so many subscribers appeared, that we all fancied our fortunes made. In a few days, our list contained more than three thousand names. Orders from the provinces were large in proportion. If le Jay had been a man of OF MIRAEEAU. 127 business; or if his wife, who managed every thing, had shown a little order and probity, they would have acquired a rapid fortune, for they had a considerable allowance for printing and commission. They had, besides, a fourth part of the net profits, and Mirabeau had given up his share to them also; but their impro- priety of conduct and rapacity ruined the undertak- ing. Being entirely occupied in writing the articles, and residing, moreover, at Versailles, we were obliged to trust wholly to their integrity. The subscribers were continually making complaints ; and those in the provinces were so neglected that they were sometimes a whole month without receiving any paper, because le Jay had often not money enough to pay for the car- riage of the papers by the diligence. The parcels were delayed, and the country booksellers complained without obtaining redress. The printer at Paris re- fused to print when his payments were behind hand, and Mirabeau was often obliged to make advances to keep the thing going. When, at the expiration of four months, we called for an account, there was none forthcoming. Madame le Jay concealed her books. She had furnished her house and stocked her shop with the money received, and her small pamphlet stall had been converted into a splendid bookseller's shop ; in short, all in her establishment announced opulence; but having appropriated to herself the amount of the subscriptions, she would come to no 128 RECOLLECTIONS settlement. I left it to Duroverai to settle this busi- ness, for litigation did not accord with my habits. Money matters interested me very little, and I un- derstood them not. Mirabeau was placed between two fires. He was irritated at Madame le Jay's dis- honesty, and said to her one day in my presence, *' Madame le Jay, if probity did not exist, it should be invented as a means of growing rich." But Madame le Jay had other means of obtaining the vic- tory, and Mirabeau's liaison with this artful and de- termined female permitted him not to make too much noise. She was in possession of all his secrets ; knew too many anecdotes about him ; and was too danger- ous and too fond of mischief for him to think of a rupture, although he was tired of her, and in the high sphere in which he was moving, often felt that such a connection degraded him. This is the only time, during the whole course of my life, that I was ever involved in a dispute relative to money matters, and had an opportunity of closely observing the ma- noeuvres of fraud and the passion of cupidity. Le Jay was a fool who promised every thing ; but he trembled like a child before his wife. Mirabeau, ashamed of our disappointment, swore that the nation- al assembly was easier to govern than a woman who had made up her mind. But violence is always over- come by sang-froid. She replied to his reproaches with the most piquant raillery. "All the bar," OF MIRABEAU. 129 said he, ^^ would grow grey before they could con- vince her. I defy the most artful lawyer to find the subtleties which she invents.'^ As it was impossible to recover our money by a law-suit, we came to a determination of ceasing our contributions to the jour- nal. This disconcerted her at first ; but she thought she could easily induce me to go on again, and under- took it in a conversation full of artifice. Without anger, and without even alluding to the subject of our quarrel, I drily told her that I would never separate from Duroverai. " Very well," replied she, " do as you please. I am sorry for it ; but there are other writers in this great city besides you, and I have al- ready received advances from several." On leaving me she applied to all the literary men she knew, and proposed her journal; for in her own opinion it was as much her property as any estate she might have purchased ; and she had considered Duroverai and me merely as two labourers in her hire. After many fruitless attempts, she at length got two individuals to undertake it; one of whom was M. Guiraudez, a man of talent and learning, whom I had met at Mira- beau's. Such a proceeding, more than uncivil, and which surprised me much, met with its just reward ; for had these gentlemen possessed more talent than really belonged to them, they had not not been in the practice of attending the national assembly, were una- ble to designate individuals, and having no communi- 130 RECOLLECTIONS cations with any of the deputies, through whom alone they could have ascertained what was going on be- hind the scenes, they gave nothing but long and tame extracts from speeches, without being able to afford any interesting information. Mirabeau was furious at the abuse of his name, and wanted to insert notices in all the public prints. Complaints to Madame le Jay poured in from all quarters. Guiraudez and his colleague, ashamed of their conduct, and still more at their want of success, — overwhelmed, moreover, with reproaches from Mirabeau, — repented of what they had done ; and without coming to any settlement with Madame le Jay about the past, we entered into a new arrange- ment for the future. I know not why I have written these insignificant details. I shall expunge them if I find hereafter that these Recollections become suflSciently interest- ing to deserve my more particular attention. The composition of this journal became a source of amusement to us. Duroverai and I undertook the alternate sittings of the assembly. A few words written in pencil, sufficed to call to our recollection the arguments of a speech and the order of a debate. We never intended to give all the idle prating in the tribune. As most of the important speeches were written, Mirabeau took care to ask for them for us, and many deputies sent them as from themselves. OF MIR ABE AU. 131 The most diffuse sometimes complained of our re- ducing their dropsical and turgescent productions. Though few were satisfied, yet Mirabeau received thanks which he did not fail to transmit us. '^ The provincials must think, '^ said Chapelier to him, ^^that we speak like oracles, when we are read stripped of our verbiage and nonsense." Our principal care in important discussions, was to omit no argument advanced by either party. It was an impartial expose of the case. Even Mirabeau, although his extravagances were palliated, obtained no flattery. Barring a few innocent pleasantries, which served to amuse our readers, we never indulged in personalities, and, except in a few particular cases, Mirabeau himself felt that the greatest service we could render him was never to lend ourselves to the vengeance of his self-love. Sieyes complained bit- terly of some criticisms upon his ^'^ Rights of Man" and upon his ^^ Principles of Constitutions." " Do not make me quarrel with that man," said Mira- beau, <^for his vanity is implacable." I have lately read many articles of this journal, and am now surprised at the boldness with which the assembly is censured. The want of order and con- nection in its constitutional and financial operations ; its manner of laying down general principles and over- looking details ; its insidious manner of anticipating decisions ; its having overthrown the old established 132 RECOLLECTIONS authority before other institutions were formed to replace it 5 its constituting itself an oflGice of delation ; and its usurpation of ministerial duties, are all visited with severe comments. The defects of its internal regulations are presented with the boldness of naked truth, and a faithful picture is given of its incoherent disorder, and the fiery impatience always attendant upon its proceedings. During an absence of Duroverai, in 1790, M. Reybaz, who had already supplied us with several very interesting articles, undertook his share of the work, and executed it with much more accuracy than he. I ended my labours, in the beginning of March, by a discussion on religious communities and the spirit of monarchism. Duroverai and Reybaz con- tinued together for some months, and the paper, abandoned at length by Mirabeau, became a mere compilation of speeches and decrees, and retained nothing of our journal but the name. I was often disgusted with this work, because the simple operation of abridging speeches and reporting the tumultuous proceedings of the assem- bly, was not a kind of occupation to afford me plea- sure. On the other hand, the rapidity of the whirl- wind by which the assembly was swept along, left no time for study and meditation. Thus the work, in spite of some tolerable articles, is mediocre and often very bad. I am not surprised that it incurred at last OF MIRABEAU. 133 the same contempt as all the ephemeral productions of that period. I shall, however, extract in another place, some passages which may serve to give an idea of the interior of the assembly, and which no one would take the trouble of looking for in a large com- pilation. Besides my contributions to this journal, I con- tinued to supply my share of Mirabeau's legisla- tive labours. I shall now proceed to matters much more interesting. 134 RECOLLECTIONS CHAPTER VII. After the insurrection of Paris, the national as- sembly was soon completed by the union with it of the majority of the nobles and the minority of the clergy. The forms of ordinary civility were still entertained, by the tiers-etaty towards these two orders, who were received with silence and dignity, but without bravado. The speeches of Bailly, then president of the assembly, were too complimentary, and sincerity was sacrificed to good- breeding. Whilst the bosoms of all were ulcerated and bleeding, their words breathed nothing but friendship and concord. These manoeuvres were in- tended to impose upon the people ; but the people were not to be so imposed upon, and such forced and evidently hypocritical language tended only to de- stroy their confidence in the assembly. The disorders of the Paris insurrection had not ceased, and the massacres with which the metropolis had been disgraced, were imitated in the provinces. OF MIRABEAU. 135 Under these circumstances, several members pro- posed an address from the national assembly to the people. After the success of my first, I considered addresses as belonging to my peculiar department, and I wrote one which was a species of political ser- mon. It was at first applauded, but ultimately re- jected. I know not whether it thwarted the views of certain persons ; be that as it may, it was much praised but not accepted. It was afterwards printed in the Courrier de Provence,* Whether this ad- dress were adopted or not, it would have made not the slightest difference. Insurrections are not to be arrested by words ; and if, under such circumstances, an exhortation ever succeeds, it is when used only as a preamble to force. So fearful were the assembly of ofiending the people, that motions tending to the repression of disorder, and the censure of popular excesses, were considered almost as snares. Mistrust was still in every bosom. The assembly had triumphed by means of the people, towards whom, therefore, they could not display great severity ; and it is a notorious fact, that although they often stated in their pream- bles how severely they were afflicted and irritated, at the violent excesses committed by the brigands, who burned chateaus and insulted the nobility — they * Vide Appendix, No. 2. 136 RECOLLECTIONS secretly rejoiced, in reality, at the existence of a terror, which they conceived salutary. They had placed themselves between the alternatives of fearing the nobles, or being feared by them. They censured to save appearances, but policy prevented them from punishing ; they paid compliments to authority, but gave encouragement to licentiousness. Respect for the executive was, with them, a mere formula of style, and, in fact, when the king's ministers came and manifested their weakness, and revealed their direful anticipations, the assembly, remembering their own late fears, were not sorry that fear had changed sides. ^^ If you were powerful enough to be feared by the people, you would be sufficiently so to be feared by us I" Such was the feeling prevalent among what was called the cote gauche. It was the reaction of fear. I must not omit that, at this period, not only the general opinion in France, but that of all Europe, was in favour of the democratic party in the assem- bly. A feeling of pleasure was generally enter- tained at a revolution which had overthrown the ancient government of France. It may be said, with truth, that throughout Eu- rope, all who were not patricians, had trembled for the fate of the commons, and had considered their delivery as a service rendered to the human race in general. It was the cause of mankind against the OF MIRABEAU. 137 powers usurped by the exclusive and privileged classes. The unhappy events which debased the revolution, throw at the present day a sinister shade even upon its very cradle. We are ashamed of hav- ing admiredj at its birth, a cause which, during its progress, we were forced to abhor. But let the im- partial historian recollect, that when the French revolution first broke out, there was a general excite- ment, a sort of intoxication of hope ; and that the enthusiasm raised by the grandeur of the object, generated a degree of insensibility to its first ex- cesses, which were considered merely as unfortunate accidents occurring during the ceremony of a na- tional triumph. Surely, every part of a ruined and antiquated edifice could not fall to the ground with- out crushing some of the mistaken individuals who persevered in their endeavours to prop it up. Such was the opinion of the master minds of Europe, of the soundest philosophers, the greatest philanthro- pists, and the dearest friends of freedom. If it were an error, it was a universal one. England, as the noblest and most free, declared her opinions in a more marked manner than other states ; and in that kingdom, the news of the fall of the Bastille was re- ceived with the most joyful acclamations. If the British government did not allow that event to be re- presented on the stage, it was only from personal respect for the king of France. The whole nation 138 RECOLLECTIONS felt the strongest sympathy towards the French peo- ple, with whom they sincerely rejoiced at the over- throw of despotism. This enthusiasm was maintained almost throughout the existence of the first national assembly. It diminished after the events of the 5th and 6th of . October. Many admirers cooled in their praise, and many influential men began to think that the French people were treating, with too great indignity, a king who had done so much for them ; and to fear that the national character was too impetuous, and too violent for the rational enjoyment of freedom. So small, how- ever, was the number of individuals who disapprov- ed, that their opinion made but a slight impression. The first decisive blow struck at the enthusiasm in favour of the revolution, was that famous production of Burke's, in which alone he grappled with the gi- gantic strength of the assembly, and represented these new legislators, in the full enjoyment of power and honours, as so many maniacs, who could destroy, but who were unable to replace. This work, res- plendent with genius and eloquence, though written in an age when imagination was on the decline, led to the formation of two parties in England. How- ever the arguments of Burke may seem to have been justified by posterior events, it yet remains to be shown, that the war cry then raised against France did not greatly contribute to the violence which OF MIUABEAU. 139 characterised that period. It is possible, that had he merely roused the attention of the governments and wealthy classes to the dangers of this new poli- tical creed, he might have proved the saviour of Eu- rope ; but he made such exaggerated statements, and used arguments so alarming to freedom, that on many points, he was not only plausibly, but victoriously refuted. Be that as it may, this publication of Burke's, which was a manifesto against the assembly, had a prodigious success in England. The Ger- mans, who more than any other people, had winced under the yoke of the nobles, persevered in their admiration of the French legislators. The united national assembly commenced their proceedings with the famous declaration on the rights of man. The idea was American, and there was scarcely a member who did not consider such a de- claration an indispensable preliminary. I well re- member the long debate on the subject, which lasted several weeks, as a period of mortal ennui. There were silly disputes about words, much metaphysical trash, and dreadfully tedious prosing. The assem- bly had converted itself into a Sorbonne, and each apprentice in the art of legislation was trying his yet unfledged wings upon such puerilities. After the rejection of several models, a committee of five members was appointed to present a new one. Mira- beau, one of the five, undertook the work with his 140 RECOLLECTIONS usual generosity, but imposed its execution upon his friends. He set about the task, and there were he, Duroverai, Claviere, and I, writing, disputing, add- ing, striking out, and exhausting both time and patience upon this ridiculous subject. At length we produced our piece of patchwork, our mosaic of pretended natural rights which never existed. Dur- ing the progress of this stupid compilation, I made some reflections, which had never struck me before. I felt the inconsistency and ridicule of a work, which was only a puerile fiction. A declaration of rights could be made only after the framing of the constitution, and as one of its consequences; for rights exist in virtue of laws, and therefore do not precede them. The maxims sanctioned by this de- claration ; that is to say, the principles intended to be established by it, are dangerous in themselves, for legislators should not be tied down to general propo- sitions which they are afterwards obliged to alter or modify ; — above all, they must not be cramped by false maxims. Men are born free and equal! that is not true. They are not born free , on the contrary, they are born in a state of weakness and necessary dependence. .E^^^wa/.Miow are they so? or how caw they be so? if by equality is understood equality of fortune, of talents, of virtue, of industry, or of rank, then the falsehood is manifest. It would require volumes of argument to give any reasonable meaning OF MIRABEAU. 141 to that equality proclaimed without exception. In a word, my opinion against the declaration of the rights of man was so strongly formed, that this time it influenced that of our little committee. Mirabeau, on presenting the project, even ventured to make some objections to it, and proposed to defer the decla- ration of rights until the constitution should be com- pleted. "I can safely predict/^ said he, in his bold and energetic style, <* that any declaration of rights anterior to the constitution, will prove but the al- manac of a single year .'" Mirabeau, generally satisfied with a happy turn of expression, never gave himself the trouble of studying a subject sufficiently to be able to discuss it, and patiently maintain the opinion he had advanced. He seized every thing with marvellous facility, but developed nothing. He wanted the practice of refu- tation. This great art, so indispensable to a politi- cal orator, was unknown to him. His opinion on the declaration surprised the assembly, because, when the question was previously discussed, he had argued in favour of its necessity. The most violent reproaches were addressed to him at this sudden change of senti- ment. ^^What manner of man is this," cried some one, "who uses his ascendency here to make the assembly adopt by turns both sides of a question ? Shall we condescend to be the sport of his perpe- tual tergiversation ?" Mirabeau had on this occasion 142 RECOLLECTIONS SO many good reasons to urge in favor of his propo- sition, that he would no doubt have triumphed had he known how to make use of them, but he withdrew his motion at the instant when several deputies had come over to his way of thinking. The eternal bab- ble had then full range, and at last gave birth to the unfortunate declaration of the rights of man. I have now a complete refutation of it, clause by clause, from the pen of a great master who has exposed, in the clearest manner, the contradictions, absurdities and dangers of this programme of sedition, which proved alone sufficient to overthrow the constitution of which it formed part. It may be compared to a powder magazine placed under an edifice, which it might overthrow by an explosion produced by the smallest spark.* But if the assembly wasted much time in discuss- ions on the rights of man, this was amply compensa- ted in the nocturnal sitting of the 4th of August. Never was so much work done in so short a space of time. That which would have required twelve months of careful examination, was proposed, dis- cussed, put to the vote, and passed by general accla- mation. I know not how many laws were decreed; — the abolition of feudal rights, tithes, and provincial privileges — three questions embracing a whole system of jurisprudence and politics — were, with ten or * Vide Tactique des MssemhUes deliherantes, vol. 2. OF MIRABEAU. 143 twelve others, disposed of in less time than the English parliament would decide upon the j&rst reading of any bill of consequence. The assembly resembled a dying man who had made his will in a hurry ; or to speak more plainly, each member gave away what did not belong to him, and prided himself upon his generosity at the expense of others. I was present at this extraordinary and unexpected scene, which occurred on a day when Sieyes, Mira- beau and several other leading deputies were absent. The proceedings commenced with a report on the excesses in the provinces, the burning of chateaus, and the bands of banditti who attacked the nobles and laid waste the country. The Dukes of Aiguillon and Noailles and several other members of the mi- nority of the nobles, after a vivid description of the disasters, declared that it was by a great act of gen- erosity alone that tranquillity and confidence could be restored ; that it was, therefore, time to forego odious privileges, and make the people feel the bene- fits of the revolution. It is impossible to describe the eifervescence which burst forth in the assembly at this declaration. There was no longer calmness or reflection. Each came forward with a sacrifice — each laid a fresh offering upon the altar of his country — each despoiled himself or despoiled others. There was no time taken for consideration, or for objection ; a sentimental contagion seemed to drag every heart 144 RECOLLECTIONS into one general torrent. This renunciation of all privileges, this abandonment of so many rights bur- thensome to the people, these multiplied sacrifices, bore a stamp of magnanimity which covered with its splendour the indecent haste and precipitation, so ill- suited to legislators, with which they were made. On this night I saw good and brave deputies shed tears of joy on perceiving their work of political regeneration advance so rapidly, and on finding them- selves borne on the wings of enthusiasm even beyond their most sanguine hopes. It is true that all were not actuated by the same feeling. He who found himself ruined by a proposition unanimously agreed to, moved another from spite, and because he would not suifer alone. But the assembly were not in the secret of the principal movers of these mea- sures, and the latter took advantage of the general enthusiasm to carry their point. The renunciation of the provincial privileges was made by the depu- ties of the respective provinces. The deputies from Brittany, who had promised to maintain theirs, were much more embarrassed ; but they came forward in a body and declared that they would exert their utmost influence with their constituents to obtain a ratification of this abandonment of their privileges. This great and magnanimous measure was necessary to restore political unity in a kingdom formed by a successive aggregation of several smaller states, each OF MIRABEAU. 145 of which had preserved certain antiquated rights and particular privileges which it was now necessary to destroy? in order to form a social body susceptible of receiving one general constitution. The following day brought reflection, and with it discontent. Mirabeau and Sieyes, each, however, from personal motives, very strongly reprobated the madness of such enthusiasm. " This is just the cha- racter of our Frenchmen," said the former, '^ they are three months disputing about syllables, and in a single night they overturn the whole venerable edi- fice of the monarchy." Sieyes was more annoyed at the abolition of tithes than at all the rest. It was hoped that in a subsequent sitting the most impru- dent clauses of these precipitate decrees might be amended ; but it was not easy to recall concessions which the people already looked upon as an indispu- table right. Sieyes made a speech full of force and logic, in which he showed that to abolish tithes without an indemnity, was spoliating the clergy to enrich the land owners ; for each having purchased his property with the burthen of tithes upon it, would on a sudden find himself richer by one tenth part, which would be a gratuitous present. This speech, impossible to be refuted, he concluded with the fa- mous saying : " They would be free, and know not how to be just!". ..The prejudice was so strong that even Sieyes was not listened to. He was looked T 146 RECOLLECTIONS upon as an ecclesiastic unable to forego his personal interest, and who was paying the tribute of error to his gown. A little more, and he would have been hooted and hissed. I beheld him next day full of bitter resentment and profound indignation against the injustice and folly of the assembly, whom he never pardoned. He gave vent to his irritated feelings in a conversation with Mirabeau, when the latter said to him : " My dear abbe, you have let loose the bull and you now complain that he gores you!'^ These two men had always a very contemptible opinion of the national assembly. They were well qualified to appreciate its faults, yet neither of them granted it his esteem but on condition that his own opinion should always prevail. If either was ap- plauded, he discovered that the majority had good sense when left to their own judgment ; if either re- ceived marks of disapprobation, he then discovered that the assembly was composed of fools under the influence of a few seditious members. I have often seen Mirabeau graduate his opinion by this kind of thermometer ; and assuredly he was not the only one. The contempt of Sieyes might have been thought sincere, because he did not lay himself out for ap- plause, and always preserved a disdainful silence; but Mirabeau was infected with the speaking mania, and no one could for a moment believe that he was indifferent to applause. Both felt that a single OF MIRABEAU. 147 legislative assembly was insufficient, because' there was nothing to controul it ; and the occurrences of the 4th of August proved to what extent the contagion of enthusiasm and eloquence could influence its pro- ceedingSj and make it adopt the most absurd mea- sures. Far from having put a stop to violence and bri- gandage, the decrees of the 4th of August showed the people their strength, and convinced them that the most monstrous attacks upon the nobility would be overlooked, if they did not even elicit a recompense. I repeat, that what is granted through fear, never satisfies; and they whom you think your concessions will disarm, acquire tenfold confidence and audacity. 148 RECOLLECTIONS CHAPTER VIII. Soon after the discussion on the decrees of the 4th of August, constitutional questions were introduced, and one of the most important was that of the veto. It must not be supposed that this subject underwent a regular debate similar to those in the English house of commons. A list of speakers for and against was made out ; each appeared,- manu- script in hand, and read a dissertation unconnected with any thing that had been urged by preceding orators. I can imagine nothing more disgustingly tedious than this species of academic lecture, — the reading of those heavy pamphlets teeming with repe- titions and devoid of any continued chain of argu- ment. The form of a debate in which each speaks either to reply or attack, stimulates all the faculties and keeps up the attention; but those prepared speeches refuted objections which had never been urged, and did not refute those which had been ur- ged. The proceedings were always in the same stage ; OF MIR ABE AU. 149 each speaker opened the question as if no other had preceded him, and nothing but the fanaticism attendant upon public events could have resisted the mortal ennui of these sittings. Mirabeau had deter- mined to support the absolute veto^ considered of vital importance to the monarchy ; but with regard to the manner of treating this question, he had placed himself under the tuition of the Marquis de Caseaux, author of an unintelligible book on the me- chanism of human societies, and of another entitled '' Simplicity of the Idea of a Constitution" which no one had been able to read or understand. I believe that, for once, Mirabeau was not sorry to proceed without us. He therefore concealed from us his alliance with his apocalyptic friend, and merely in-r formed us he was prepared and had made a few notes, which he should develope in the tribune. After being forced to listen to so many execrable speeches. Mirabeau's appearance in the tribune delighted every body; but scarcely had he begun when I recognized the. style and doctrines of Caseaux. The embarrassed constructions, the singularity of the words, the lengthy periods and the obscurity of the reasoning, soon cooled the attention of the assembly. It was at length made out that he supported the absolute veto, and this excited much disapprobation. Mirabeau, who had scarcely looked at this trash before he left home, threw himself immediately into digressions, 150 RECOLLECTIONS inveighed against despotism, and by some smart things, which he had always at command, obtained the applause of the galleries ; but the moment he reverted to his fatal manuscript, the tumult again com- menced, and he had much difficulty in getting to the end of his speech, although on such occasions his courage never deserted him. By supporting the absolute veto, Mirabeau gave great offence to the popular party ; but his speech was so obscure, that the galleries nCver found out what side of the ques- tion he had taken, and the Palais Royal, who were in a frenzy against the supporters of the absolute veto, did not cease to consider Mirabeau as one of its most zealous opponents. That which would have de- stroyed the popularity of any other, seemed to have no power over his. The cote gauche thought that he had affected obscurity on this occasion in order to be able to turn to any side of the question ; so that the nonsense of Caseaux was imputed to a profound politician, and pure machiavelism was traced in every part of a writing which no one could understand. I never saw Mirabeau out of countenance but this once. He confessed to me that as he proceeded with the manuscript, which he had not before read, he felt himself in a cold perspiration ; and that he had omitted one half of it without being able to substitute any thing in its stead, having, in his over confidence in Caseaux, neglected to study the subject. We cor- OF MIRABEAU. 151 reeled this speech a little before we published it in the Cuurrier de Provence; but the original fantastic style and obscurity could not be entirely effaced. It is thus the most important matters in legislation were treated j ex ungue leonem. This was tlie first con- stitutional question in which the people took a strong interest; and it may be readily supposed that it was a question which they little understood. The veto, in their eyes, assumed every possible form — it was a monster that would devour them all. I shall never forget that in going to Paris with Mirabeau, either on that day or the next, there were many people congregated on the outside of Madame le Jay's shop, waiting for him. They ran to him and conjured him, with tears in their eyes, not to suffer the king to have the absolute veto. ^^ Monsieur le Comte, you are the father of the people; you must save us, you must defend us against those who want to deliver us up to despotism. If the king is to have the veto, there will be no further occasion for a national as- sembly ; all will be lost and we shall be slaves !" A thousand such absurdities were uttered, and all pro- ceeded from the most earnest dread of a thing they had not the slightest idea of. On these occasions Mirabeau always displayed great dignity and con- descension; he managed to appease them with vague answers, and dismissed them with a politeness some- what patrician. 152 RECOLLECTIONS Mirabeau did not vote upon the question, and that is the reason why he was not upon the list, taken to the Palais Royal, of those who had support- ed the absolute veto. Surely this conduct was pu- sillanimous, but he covered it with the mask of his soi-disant contempt for the assembly. The proceed- ings on this question proved the absurdity of voting separately upon constitutional laws ; for it is evident that they must be compared with each other to try whether they perfectly coincide. The law which might be very good when combined with some other, might produce a very bad effect if taken alone. Nothing but presumption and inexperience could have induced the national assembly to proceed in any other way, and daily issue unconnected con- stitutional decrees, without having previously deter- mined upon the plan of a constitution, so as to have a whole before them. In the veto, for instance ; — before they decided upon the question, they should have determined whether the legislation were to consist of two chambers or of only one. The settle- ment of the latter point was an indispensable prelim- inary; for if the legislature were not divided, the absolute veto became positively necessary to prevent the single chamber from usurping the supreme power. At the same time, the king would have been too weak to exercise the absolute veto against the strong and unanimous wish of the national a«sem- OF MIRABEAU. 153 bly. It would not be good policy in a sovereign, under such circumstances, to oppose the wish of the whole nation. If the legislature were divided into two sections, then the absolute veto would become less necessary, because there was not even a proba- bility that the two sections would go hand in hand upon every question. One might, therefore, oppose the other. Thus the decision of one question de- pending upon another, both ought to be considered in coming to a conclusion. The greatest fault the assembly committed, was to work upon detached parts ; for thus it is that an irregular edifice was con- structed without proportion or correctness. Some parts were too strong, others too weak. There were incoherent masses which could not sustain the slightest shock, a gigantic elevation, and foundations which gave way under the weight of the fabric. But these defects originated in an extreme ambition to shine, and in an eager anxiety, in making a motion, to anticipate that of some other member. There was nothing concerted, nothing prepared. Each de- lighted in pilfering the propositions of another, in smuggling in an article out of its place, and in sur- prising the assembly by something unexpected. A constitution committee had been appointed, but this committee, a prey to jealousy and quarrels, could come to no understanding, nor direct their labours to a common object. It was a miniature likeness of u ■ 154 RECOLLECTIONS the assembly ; composed of the same elements^ the same prejudices, the same desire of shining exclu- sively and the same struggle of self-love. Each, in short, took upon himself to introduce matters accord- ing to his own judgment, and often for no earthly reason than to be beforehand with the others. Study and meditation were foreign to the habits of the as- sembly ; its decrees were passed almost at the sword's point, and the most fiery passions had neither truce nor interval. After having overthrown every thing that existed, all must be reconstructed at once ; and so high an opinion had the assembly of their own powers, that they would willingly have undertaken to frame a code for all nations. Historians will say enough about the misfortunes of the revolution, but it would be not less essential to denounce the primi- tive faults which led to these misfortunes ; to go still further back, — the composition of the assembly ought to be examined, and particularly the circum- stances in which originated the mistrust, the struggle between the orders, the victory of the commons and the degradation of the royal authority. The most leading trait in the French character is self-vanity. Each member of the assembly thought himself equal to any undertaking. Never were seen so many men congregated together, who fancied themselves legislators, capable of repairing the faults of the past, finding a remedy for all the errors of the OF MIRABEAU. 155 human mind, and securing the happiness of future generations. Doubt of their own powers never once found its way into their bosoms, and infallibility always presided over their decisions. In vain did a strong minority accuse them, and protest against their measures ; the more they were attacked, the more were they satisfied with their own transcendent wisdom. When the king presumed to transmit to them some mild remonstrances upon the decrees of the 4th of August and the declaration of rights, they were surprised that ministers should dare to criticise their proceedings, and M. Necker, who was the au- thor of the criticisms, began from that moment to lose his influence among them. I have been able to compare the English and French of the same rank in life, and I have attended assiduously the sittings of the English parliament and those of the national assembly. There is no point of opposition in the character of the two nations more striking than the reserve, approaching timidity, of the Englishman, and the confidence in himself displayed by the Frenchman. I often used to think that if a hundred persons indiscriminately were stop- ped in the streets of London, and the same number in the streets of Paris, and a proposal made to each individual to undertake the government of his coun- try, ninety-nine would accept the oifer at Paris and ninety-nine refuse it in London. 156 RECOLLECTIONS Few of the speeches made in the assembly were written by the parties who uttered them. A French- man made no scruple of using the composition of another, and acquiring honour by a species of public imposture. No Englishman of character would con- sent to play such a part. A Frenchman would put himself forward and make any motion suggested to him, without once troubling himself about the conse- quences; whilst an Englishman would be afraid of exposing himself, if he had not sufficiently studied his subject to be able to answer every reasonable objec- tion, and support the opinion he had advanced. A Frenchman affirms upon very light grounds ; an assertion costs him nothing ;— an Englishman is in no haste to believe, and before he publicly advances a fact, he traces it to its source, weighs his authorities, and makes himself master of particulars. A French- man believes that with a little wit he can stem a tor- rent of difficulties. He is ready to undertake things the most foreign to his habits and studies, and it was thus that Mirabeau got himself appointed reporter to the committee of mines, without having the slightest knowledge concerning mines. An Englishman would expose himself to eternal ridicule if he dared to invade a department of which he knew nothing ; and he is more disposed to refuse undertaking that which he is able to perform, than to be ambitious of doing what he knows to be beyond his powers. The OF MIRABEAU. 157 Frenchman believes that wit supplies the place of every thing ; the Englishman is persuaded that no- thing can be properly done without both knowledge and practice. A French gentleman being asked if he could play upon the harpsichord, replied, "I do not know, for I never tried ; but I will go and see." Now this is badinage, but make it serious ; — for harpsichord substitute government, and for music legislation, and, instead of one French gentleman you would find twelve hundred. Romilly had written a very interesting work upon the regulations observed in the English house of com- mons. These regulations are the fruit of long and closely reasoned experience ; and the more they are examined, the more worthy are they found of admi- ration. They are rigorously enforced in an assembly extremely jealous of innovation ; and as they are not written, it required much pains and labour to collect them. This little code indicated the best manner of putting questions, preparing motions, discussing them, telling the votes, appointing committees, — of carrying on, in short, all the proceedings of a political assembly. At the commencement of the meeting of the states-general, I translated this work. Mirabeau presented it, and deposited it upon the bureau of the commons, at the time when it was in contemplation to draw up a set of regulations for the national assembly. "We are not English, and we want nothing English !" 158 RECOLLECTIONS was the reply. This translation of Romilly's work, although printed, was not taken the least notice of; nor did any member ever condescend to inquire how matters were conducted in so celebrated an assembly as the British parliament. The national vanity was wounded at the idea of borrowing the wisdom of any other people, and they preferred maintaining their own defective and dangerous mode of conducting their proceedings, of which the sitting of the 4th of August was a painful illustration. When Brissot talked about constitution, his fami- liar phrase was, ^^That is what lost England." Sieyes, Dupont, Condorcet, and many others with whom I was acquainted, were precisely of the same way of thinking. " How !'' once replied Duroverai, feigning astonishment, "is England lost?" when did you receive the news, and in what latitude was she lost?" The laugh was against Brissot ; and Mira- beau, who was then writing one of his speeches against Mounier, attributed to the latter Brissot's stupid saying, in order to have the pleasure of ma- king him the object of Duroverai's bon mot. Mou- nier complained of this in his first pamphlet, wherein he points out Mirabeau's mistatements relative to a sitting of which he professed to give a faithful account. OF MIRABEAU. 159 CHAPTER IX. I HAVE not many recollections of the month of Sep- tember. During that period I met at Mirabeau's two men of very different characters. The first was Camille Desmoulins, who signed several of his writings as the attorney- general of the lantern. It must not, however, be imagined that he excited the people to use the lantern posts in the stead of gallows, an abomination attributed to him by M. Bertrand de Molleville ; — quite the reverse, he pointed out the danger and injustice of such summary executions, but in a tone of lightness and badinage by no means in keeping with so serious a subject. Camille appeared to me what is called a good fellow ; of rather exag- gerated feelings, devoid of reflection or judgment, as ignorant as he was unthinking, not deficient in wit, but in politics possessing not even the first elements of reason. Walking with him one day, I gave him some explanations on the constitution of England, of which he had been talking with the most profound 160 RECOLLECTIONS ignorance of the subject. Three years afterwards, Camille, who had become a great man, by means of his jacobinism and his intimacy with Robespierre, and had cultivated his talents, wrote a work, in which, giving an account of his own life since the beginning of the revolution, he condescended, en passant, to give me a kindly recollection by representing me as an emissary of Pitt placed near Mirabeau to mislead him, and as preaching the English constitution at Versailles. I never read this work, but have been told that it was clever, Camille being one of those whom circumstances have led to acquire talents. The other person whom I met at Mirabeau's was La Clos, the author of the Liaisons Dangereuses, This individual, belonging to the household of the Duke of Orleans, was witty though sombre, taciturn and reserved'; with the face and look of a conspirator, he was so cold and distant, that although I met him several times, I scarcely ever spoke to him. I knew not his object in visiting Mirabeau. The events of the 5th and 6th of July have been attributed to the Duke of Orleans, and Mirabeau was implicated in the conspiracy. The national assembly decreed that there was no ground of accusation against either. But the acquittal of the assembly is not the verdict of history, and many doubts require still to be solved before a correct judgment can be formed. Notwith- standing my intimacy with Mirabeau at this period, OF MIRABEAU. 161 he never let me into the secret of his having formed any connection with the Duke of Orleans. If then such a fact be true, I am not aware of it. In my recollections of the most minute circumstances, which could not fail to betray a man so confiding and imprudent as Mirabeau, I find not the slightest ground for supposing him an accomplice in the pro- ject against the court. It is true, nevertheless, that his intimacy with La Clos might indicate some inten- tion on the part of the duke to negotiate with him for his services. Mirabeau sometimes visited Mon- trouge, and once or twice, I believe, met the duke there ; but it cannot be inferred from this that they conspired together. I remember hearing him speak somewhat favourably of this prince, that is to say of his natural talents ; for in morals he said that nothing must be imputed to the duke, who had lost his taste, and could not therefore distinguish good from evil. About the same time, Mirabeau said to Duroverai and me, ^^I am quite astonished at finding myself a philosopher, because I was born to be an adventurer. But, who knows? They are going to tear the king- dom to pieces; I have some interest in Provence . . . ." Duroverai interrupted him with a laugh. " Ah ! he already thinks himself Count of Provence." — ^^Well," replied Mirabeau, /^ many have risen from smaller beginnings." All this was but the result of V 162 RECOLLECTIONS high animal spirits, and his fervent imagination anti" cipated nothing but ruin and overthrow. The only cireumstance I know to his disadvantage, was his preparing a work which he concealed from us. When the assembly quitted Versailles, to meet at Paris, Duroverai and I having called at Mira- beau's, who was already gone, to collect some papers which concerned us jointly, le Jay arrived in a trav- elling dress, and had a van at the door. He seemed much agitated, and had some difficulty in making us comprehend the cause. He had been somewhere to fetch the edition of a book which had been printed clandestinely, ought to have arrived a week sooner, and which he was now afraid of taking to Paris. " What edition ? What book ? What is it about?" — " Why," replied le Jay, ^^ it is the book against royalty." — " Against royalty, pray bring us a copy." It was a small volume, with a preface by Mirabeau, and the name of the author. I do not remember the precise title, but I think it was '^ On Royalty,^ extracted from MiltonP It was an abridgement or translation from Milton. Detached passages had been united, and a complete body of doctrine formed from the republican writings of the great English poet. I recollect seeing Mirabeau occupied about this translation with his friend Servan, governor of the pages, who, like all the inhabitants of Versailles, OF MIRABEAU. 163 •was hostile to the court. Servan was afterwards minister of war. After the events of the 5th and 6th of October, such a publication by a member of the national assembly was not only a libel, but an act of high treason. We were the more annoyed at this conduct, because the first suspicions of Mira- beau's intimate acquaintances would have fallen upon us, as being naturally inclined to republican- ism, and being, moreover, familiar with the English language. ^ But independently of our own feelings, Mirabeau's situation was calculated to alarm us dread- fully. Duroverai put le Jay into such a fright that he already fancied himself in the Chatelet or La Tournelle. He consented to every thing we pro- posed, and we brought the whole edition into the house, and burned it the same day. Le Jay saved about a dozen copies. This expedition over, he re- turned to Paris, and gave an account to his wife of the dangers he had incurred, together with the man- ner in which we had got him out of the scrape. Madame le Jay, who had placed great dependence upon this libel, fell upon the poor husband, called him a fool, and made him feel at the same time her double superiority in strength and intelligence. She next went to Mirabeau, and denounced Durov- erai ; but Mirabeau had too much sense not to per- ceive that the book would have proved his ruin, had it been published. All he wanted v/as to keep it in 164 RECOLLECTIONS reserve against a future favourable opportunity ; but he had behaved too ill in the business to dare to re- proach us with the loss of a few thousand francs, I confess that on reflecting since upon this affair, the time at which it occurred — the delay of the edition, and the week earlier when it ought to have arrived — le Jay's journey to fetch it, and the secrecy which he was enjoined to preserve — I am sometimes tempted to think that the work w^as associated with some im- portant events, and that Mirabeau was iw the secret of the occurrences of the 5th and 6th of October. But on the other hand, I know that this compilation was begun long before, and that Mirabeau's rage for publishing was so great that it often got the better of all prudential considerations. The best conclusion at which I can arrive, after deliberately weighing every circumstance, is that, taking it for granted that the insurrection of Versailles was conducted by the Duke of Orleans, La Clos was too able a tactician to place the whole affair at Mirabeau's discretion, but had engaged him conditionally with only a partial confidence, and left a wide loop-hole to creep out at. It is impossible not to think that there was some con- nexion between them. <^^ Instead of a glass of brandy, a bottle was given." This is the figure by which Mirabeau explained the movement of Paris, upon Versailles. I presume that if the king had fled, Mirabeau v^ould have proclaimed the duke of Or- OF MIRABEAU. 165 kans lieutenant-general of the kingdom, and would have become his prime minister. Such a scheme might easily find place in a brain like Mirabeau's, and his subsequent anger against the Duke of Orleans might lead to the idea that he had been deceived in his expectations. M. de Lafayette is perhaps ac- quainted with the secret of these events, originating, perhaps, in the spontaneous rising of the people, ex- cited by a dread of famine which had, for the time being, produced a real famine. I w^as at Versailles, and saw part of what passed. But I know nothing in particular, neither did I see any thing that could characterise either a settled plan or a conspiracy. I can even say that when the event occurred, it was not explained in the same manner as it has since been. The people attributed the dearth to the aristocracy. The aristocrats, they said, destroyed the corn before it reached maturity, paid the bakers not to work, suspended trade, and threw the flour into the rivers ; — in short, there was no absurdity too gross to appear improbable. The popular journals did not cease to circulate the gross- est falsehoods. The arrival of a new regiment at Versailles had renewed the public alarm. The fete which had been given at the palace to the ojficers, was inconceivably imprudent. It could not be term- ed a conspiracy, because people do not conspire at • a public banquet of five hundred persons ; but seve- 166 RECOLLECTIONS ral anti-popular songs were sung, the national cockade insulted, the infant dauphin led about, and the king and queen, yielding to the enjoyment of these testimonies of affection, increased, by their presence, the general enthusiasm. At any other period, it would not have been imputed as a crime, that the young officers of the king's guard should become animated at a banquet, and display their affection for the royal family. The cloud which hung over this unhappy family, and the misfortunes which threatened them, were a fresh stimulus to the feelings of chivalrous honour which pervaded the bosoms of these young nobles, devoted, by profession, to the defence of their sovereign. But when the particu- lars of this banquet were made public, with every possible exaggeration, it was construed into an in- tention of rendering the revolution odious, and of forming a fresh league for the king's defence, and was therefore denounced in the assembly as evidence of a court conspiracy against the people. The cote droit was furious, and inveighed against the calumny. Mirabeau, whom Servan had excited, threw himself into the midst of the tumult, and declared that he was ready to name the principal author in the im- pious fete, provided it were decreed beforehand that the king's person was sacred and inviolable. This single expression, which cast a direct accusa- tion upon the queen, threw the cote droit into con- ' OF MIRABEAU. 167 sternation, and made the democrats themselves fear that they had gone too far. If, on this occasion, Mirabeau had adopted the most generous line of policy, and opposed the popu- lar rage, it would have been easy to give another colour to this circumstance, and place those testimo- nies of affection for the king in a favourable point of view. He might have openly complained of its being supposed that the entire assembly did not participate in these marks of affection, and have proposed a sim- ilar fete, at which the king should appear surrounded by all the representatives of France. He might, at the same time, have asked for the removal of the regiment of Flanders, whose presence was unneces- sary. But it must be admitted that this assembly, though very prodigal of their expressions of attach- ment to the king, had never yet shown it by any tangible act. The dearth which kept the people in a state of effervescence, and the banquet scene at the chateau appeared, at the time, sufficient to account for the insurrection at Paris, and the invasion at Versailles. It was not till afterwards that a plot was imagined and attributed to the duke of Orleans. This suspi- cion acquired consistency when it was known that M. de Lafayette had insisted upon the duke leaving Paris and proceeding to England. The secret of this intrigue has never transpired, but I recollect that 168 RECOLLECTIONS two years after, in a confidential conversation with M. de Talleyrand, bishop of Autun, that prelate ut- tered these remarkable words : " The Duke of Or- leans is the slop-pail into which is thrown all the filth of the revolution /" The following, so far as my recollection serves me^ was Mirabeau's conduct during these two days. On the fifth, we dined with M. Servan, in the palace called les Petites-Ecuries, in which, as governor of the pages, he had apartments. We could see from the windows opening upon the great square, the ar- rival of the Parisian multitudes, including the pois- sardes or fish women, and the market porters. This crowd demanded nothing but bread. The regiment of Flanders and the national guard were drawn up outside the external enclosure of the chateau. The king's guards, both cavalry and infantry, were formed within the great and lesser courts. There was a tumultuous movement among the crowd, the cause of which we could not well distinguish. Mirabeau was not long with us ; nay, I have an idea that he did not stay to dinner. Though the crowd was great, and there was no knowing what might happen, we walked about every where. We saw the king's carriages go off through unfrequented streets, and thought they were conveying the royal family to a place of safety. Tired of wandering, I went to the assembly at about eight o'clock in the evening. The OF MIRABEAU. 169 hall presented a curious spectacle. It had been invaded by the people from Paris, and was quite full of them. The galleries were crowded with women and men armed with halberts, bludgeons and pikes. The sitting was suspended, but a message came from the king, calling upon the president to resume it, and send a deputation to the chateau. I went to Mirabeau, whom I found in bed, although it was not eleven o'clock. He rose, and we returned to the assembly. When we arrived, the president was ex- hausting his strength in a fruitless endeavour to obtain silence. Mirabeau immediately raised his voice, and called upon the president to make the assembly respected, and order the strangers in the hall to quit the members' benches, which they had invaded. It required all Mirabeau's popularity to succeed. By degrees the populace withdrew, and the deputies began to discuss some clauses of the penal code. In the gallery in which I was sitting, there was a pois- sarde who assumed superior authority, and directed the motions of about a hundred women, awaiting her orders to make a noise or be silent. She called familiarly to the deputies, and said, '^ Who is speak- ing yonder? Make that babbler hold his tongue! We do not want his speechifying ; we want bread ! Let our little mother Mirabeau speak ; we should like to hear him!" Our little mother Mirabeau be- came the cry of the whole band ; but Mirabeau was w 170 RECOLLECTIONS not a man to show off on such occasions, and his pop- ularity never made him lose sight of his dignity. About midnight, an aide-de-camp announced the arrival of M. de Lafayette, at the head of the national guard of Paris, and every one now thought himself safe. The soldiers of the national gUard had re- newed their oath of fidelity to the law and the king, and the multitude, on being made acquainted with the king's assurances, became calmer. About two in the morning, we left the assembly, which was still sitting. On awaking some hours after, a confused account was given me of what had occurred ; of the invasion of the chateau, and the disarming of the guards. These events were then attributed to mis- understandings, imprudences and chance quarrels. Mirabeau went early to the assembly, and I was in- formed that he opposed a compliance with the king's desire of removing the assembly to the chateau, as the only means of keeping the multitude in cheek. The pretended dignity, which he put forward as a reason for sending only a deputation, certainly ap- peared suspicious. Was that a time to consult eti- quette ? Was there a duty more imperious than that of forming a living rampart around the monarch in danger? Certain it is, that had a conspiracy against the king really existed, and Mirabeau been an ac- complice, he could not have behaved otherwise than he did. But, on the other hand, how happened it. OF MIRABEAU. 171 that the assembly, who surely were not in the plot, all so instantly concurred in bis opinion ? This is a reason for believing that he had only taken advan- tage of the general feeling, and that his motion was not premeditated. There was, at this time, a marked opposition between the court and the national assem- bly, because the king had given but a half sanction to the declaration of the rights of man, and to the explanatory decrees of the 4th of August. The as- sembly was mean enough, on this occasion, to take advantage of the disorder, and call upon the king for his full and unqualified consent ; just as if his refusal had been one of the causes of the insurrec- tion. Mounier presided on that day ;— Mirabeau was very jealous of him, and had, perhaps, no other motive, even without being conscious of it, than a desire to get the better of Mounier, and injure him, by representing his opinions as derogatory from the national dignity. I did not, at the time, make these reflections, because, such was the rapidity of events, that one impression was soon effaced by another. Several deputies, against whom the fury of the populace had been excited, took to flight ; and hav- ing no hope from a revolution eff'ected by such means, they dared not return to Paris, but abandoned their post. Lally-Tolendal and Mounier were among the number. There were fifty-five or fifty-six. This 172 RECOLLECTIONS desertion was not justifiable. But, on taking into consideration the violence they had suffered, it would be but fair, prior to accusing them of cowardice, that we should ourselves have suffered, for a time, the same outrages. I never met Mounier but once, and I was present at a conversation between him and Mirabeau, at the house of a painter. Mounier's account of this conversation is quite correct. OF MIRABEAU. 173 CHAPTER X. I DID not before allude to Mirabeau's celebrated speech on the national bankruptcy, because I wished, under the same head, to add a few further observa- tions. Mirabeau was not well acquainted with the subject, although he had published several papers on it, such as ^^ The Bank of St Charles,^^ " The Denuncia- tion of Stock-jobbing,'^^ &c. But he had two able coadjutors in Panchaud and Claviere, the former of whom said, that Mirabeau was the first man in the world to speak on a question he knew nothing about. A ready conception, and the happiest expressions enabled him easily to lead artificial minds astray. When, from the effects of the revolution, the public revenue was considerably diminished, and the taxes of scarcely any value, M. Necker, unable to keep in motion an immense machine, whose moving power was almost annihilated, proposed to the assembly a loan, to which he had endeavoured to give a very 174 RECOLLECTIONS seductive form. He wanted, for this purpose, to make use of the credit of the caisse d^escompte. Claviere, who, I believe, had some feeling of perso- nal hostility towards the company of the caisse d^es- compte, engaged Mirabeau to oppose the measure. The assembly attempted to organise the loan, and proceeded with as little intelligence as on many other occasions. The consequence was, that the measure was unsuccessful, and the national credit, about which so much had been said, became worse than useless. M. Necker was soon after forced to present another project, a species of patriotic loan, somewhat resem- bling an income tax. This time, Mirabeau deter- mined to support the minister, to whom, however, he was personally hostile. There had been no inter- course between them ; for the intimacy which Du- roverai and Mallouet had attempted to bring about, had failed. Some persons suspected, that Mira- beau's support was given, in order to fix upon Necker the responsibility of the certain failure of the plan. Several stupid members, who thought that the assem- bly would be wanting in dignity, if it adopted min- isterial measures without altering something in them, proposed several modifications. Mirabeau was of opinion, that the plan required no alteration, and ergerly pressed the assembly to adopt it as it was. His principal argument was, the ill success of the last project of loan, which the friends of the minister OF MIRABEAU. 175 attributed to the assembly, who, by ill-judged modifications; had altered its nature. Thence pro- ceeding to remark upon the dangerous state of pub- lic credit, and the failure of the revenue, he repre- sented a national bankruptcy, as the probable conse- quence of the rejection of this plan. The force with which he presented so commonplace a subject, was miraculous ; he elevated it to sublimity. Those who heard this speech will never forget it; it excited every gradation of terror, and a devouring gulph, with the groans of the victims it swallowed, of which the orator gave a very appalling description, seemed pictured to the senses of the audience. The triumph was complete ; not an attempt was made to reply. The assembly were subjugated by that power of a superior and energetic mind, which acts upon the multitude, as if it were only a single individual, and the project was adopted without a dissenting voice. From that day, Mirabeau was considered as a being superior to other men. He had no rival. There were, indeed, other orators, but he alone was eloquent ; and this impression was stronger, because, in his speech on this question, he was obliged to depend entirely upon his own resour- ces ; for it was an unexpected reply, and could not, therefore, have been prepared.* * This^s the passage in Mirabeau's reply, to which M. Du- 176 RECOLLECTIONS Mole, the celebrated actor at the Theatre Fran- pais, was present. The force and dramatic eifect of Mirabeau's eloquence, and the sublimity of his voice, had made a deep impression upon this distinguished comedian, who, with visible emotion, approached mont alludes : " Oh ! if less solemn declarations did not insure our respect for public faith, and our horror of the infamous word bankruptcy, 1 would search into the secret motives, unknown, perhaps, to ourselves, which make us draw back at the very instant we are called upon to consummate a great sacrificej — inefficacious, it is true, unless it be sincere ; — and I would say to those who, from the fear of sacrifices and the dread of taxes, are, perhaps, familiarizing their minds with the idea of not keeping faith with the public creditor : — What is such a bank- ruptcy itself, but the most cruel, the most iniquitous, the most unequal, and the most ruinous of taxes ?— My friends, listen to a word-— a single word! — Two centuries of depredations and robbery have dug the gulph into which the kingdom is about to fall. This horrible gulph must be filled up ! But how ? There is but one way. Here is a list of rich men in France. Choose from among the richest, in order that you may sacrifice fewer citizens ; — but choose, at all events, for must not the smaller number perish to save the great mass of the people ? Well ! these two thousand rich men are possessed of sufficient wealth to make up the deficiency. Restore order to your finan- ces, peace and prosperity to the country; — strike, immolate your victims without pity ; precipitate them into the abyss, and it will close. . . What, do you draw back horror-struck, ye inconsistent, ye pusillanimous men ! Well, then, do you not perceive, &c. &c." — Note by the Genevese Editor. • OF MIRABEAU. 177 the ouator to offer his compliments. ^' Ah I Monsieur le Comte,'' said he in a pathetic tone of voice, " what a speech! and with what an accent did you deliver it ! Yon have surely missed your vocation !" Mole smiled on perceiving the singularity of the compliment which his dramatic enthusiasm had led him to utter, but Mirabeau was much flattered by it. Some days after, in the beginning of October, the King being already at Paris, it was determined to press this ministerial measure by an address from the national assembly to the nation. Mirabeau was re- quested to write this address, and he transferred the task to me. I undertook it with more readiness, because I was still of opinion that a solemn address, supported by authority, might yet serve as a vehicle for important truths, I had no desire to palliate the excesses of the revolution, but wished, on the con- trary, to prove, in the strongest manner possible, that the nation would be lost if it were misled any longer by wrong notions of liberty, whose mask licentiousness had assumed to render her odious. This composition was not so rapid as the address to the king, because the subject was more complicated and delicate ; for great caution was requisite not to offend the assembly itself, whose ears were irritable as those of a despot, and who took umbrage at the most indirect reproach. I devoted three days to this work, which was well received, but produced X 178 RECOLLECTIONS upon the nation just about as much effect as a sermon upon a congregation. Scarcely had it been applau- ded, when it was already forgotten. I found among my papers the original of this address almost in the same state as when I gave it to Mirabeau; there being only two or three slight alterations made by the committee appointed to draw it up.* Soon after this occurrence, Duroverai communi- cated to me a proposal made him by M. Delessert a banker of Paris, that we should accept a sum of mo- ney as a testimony of gratitude for the services we had rendered in supporting M. Necker's project; for our influence over Mirabeau was well known; and my contributions to several of his speeches, to- gether with the hand I had in framing the address to the nation, were at least suspected. M. Delessert spoke in the name of several bankers, and offered a hundred louis d'or as his share of the contribution. Duroverai had neither accepted nor refused, but said he would mention the matter to me. I was very angry that he had not immediately declined the offer of these gentlemen, in the strongest terms, as he certainly would have done had it preceded instead of following the service. We had not acted in the matter with any view to their advantage — they, therefore, owed us nothing ; and I could not but * Vide Appendix, No. 3, OF MIRABEAU. 179 perceive a bribe in disguise, in this pretended