-:»: K :«: V :'«&: V* -'21
w/ VW^X -JK'^V-
^^YV^A^ZA-!
*« -bv*
^ °o/S^\«o
^. V!
4 6
P\.^.. "°
••Vvv
»• >^ *••• jfi ^ *«.?* 4 *>w
"ov*
*o«
.,+■
5> • !•.£* >►
.'
A°A
%.'>.-
- '*„«
*>
>. t ^ *
»*' -^ a: *W V
*. — tf* ... ^ •• •*«..,., w +_ ^>
4* ••■•♦.
» \
./ /&££• & ft "\^ .*&(&-. w
^safeV'V*^.
V\.j»fc.\ y,»:^:.^ ^.jatoA. .4f
c^^rv
ELEMENTS
GREEK ACCENTUATION.
TRANSLATED FROM THE GERMAN
DR. KARL GOETTLING,
MEMBER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD.
LONDON:
PRINTED FOR WHITTAKER, TREACHER, & CO.
AVK-MAKIA LANE.
1831.
'V '''■
&\
LONDON I
GILBERT & RIVINGTON, PRINTERS
ST. john's-square.
CONTENTS.
Of the nature of accent, §. 1 — 9.
First principal law, §. 3.
Second principal law, §. 4.
Third principal law, §. 5.
Molic accentuation, §. 7-
FIRST PART.
Of the accent of individual words, §. 10 — 41.
In general, §. 10, 11.
Of the accent of the verb, §. 12 — 13.
A. Forms with a connective vowel, §. 12 — 18.
Peculiarity of mode, §. 14.
Peculiarity of tenses, §.15.
B. Forms without a connective vowel, §. 16.
Peculiarities in some contract verbs, §. 17-
Syncopised forms, §.18.
< )f the accent of substantives, §. 19 — 27-
First declension, §. 20 — 22.
Masculines in ag and //c, §. 20.
Feminines in a, §.21.
Feminines in tj, §. 22.
Second declension, §. 23, 24.
Masculines and feminines in og t §.23.
Neuters in ov y §.24.
Third declension, §. 25, 26.
Monosyllables, §. 25.
Polysyllables, §. 26.
Attic declension, §. 27-
Of the accent of adjectives, §. 28 — 34.
Simple adjectives, §. 29 — 31.
First declension, §. 29.
Second declension, §.30.
Third declension, §.31
IV CONTENTS.
Compound adjectives, §. 32 — 34.
First declension, §.32.
Second declension, §. 33.
Third declension, §.34.
Adverbs, §. 35, 36.
Independent adverbs, §.35.
Adverbs which originally were casal forms, §.36.
Particles, §.37.
Interjections, §.38.
Numerals, §. 39-
Pronouns, §. 40.
Of synthetic and parathetic combinations, §.41.
SECOND PART.
Of the accent in connected discourse, §. 42 — 47-
Elision and anastrophe produced thereby, §.43.
Crasis, §.44.
Proper anastrophe, §.45.
Unaccented words, §. 46, 47-
Proclitics, §.46.
Enclitics, §. 47*
Alphabetical List of synonymous words distinguished by the accent,
pp. 115, 116.
Index, pp. 117—123.
GREEK ACCENTUATION.
OF THE NATURE OP ACCENT.
§. 1.
Language consists of words, a word of syllables, a syllable of
two things : 1. the idea of that which is to be designated (form),
2. the tone or sound of the voice, with which the idea is to be
made audible to the ear (matter). Sound is produced by motion,
which can be considered in a three-fold relation, 1. in strength
or weakness, 2. height or depth, 3. greater or less duration.
Sound is dependent upon and subordinate to idea. But in
polysyllabic words ideas are of two kinds, either principal or
subordinate ; e. g. \iyio (I speak). The syllable Xey indicates
the idea of speaking, the syllable w is a mere designation of the
person, &c. ; therefore \ty is the principal and to the subordinate
idea. Both ought to be distinguished by the sound according
to their degree of internal worth. But this can only be effected
by one or more of the three accidents of sound, by strength,
height, or duration. Height and depth, however, in a rhetorical
proposition, constitute its melody. The duration of syllables is
independent of their relative worth ; for no one e. g. has yet
explained the internal reason why a syllable in Greek is long by
nature. The duration is determined by the quantity. To dis-
tinguish the principal above the subordinate idea, therefore,
nothing remains but the intension of the voice. Hence in
every independent or primil ire language the principal idea of
each word is distinguished by an intension of the voice, by a
strengthening or invigoration of the sound. Tins is called the
accent: consequently in \iyw the principal idea Xey must be
B
2 GREEK ACCENTUATION.
distinguished above the subordinate idea w by the accent. Every
intension of the voice, however, is involuntarily combined with
an elevation of the tone. In pronouncing the accent, therefore,
the voice must at the same time be elevated. This coincides
with the express precept of Aristophanes of Byzantium in
Arcad. p. 187. rovg rovovg roig rovoig rriC /xovgikyiq loiKacriv.
That intension, however, is the main point, is shewn by the pas-
sage in Phavorin. v. awrixn^tg from the old Grammarians, p. 237.
§.2.
A strengthening and elevation of tone in certain syllables con-
taining the principal idea of a word, cannot be conceived with-
out the existence of a less strong and deeper tone in reference
to the other syllables, which designate merely subordinate ideas.
Strength and weakness, height and depth, are simply relative
terms : hence we take a certain fundamental tone of discourse,
which depends upon the organs of the individual persons.
This common tone the speaker strengthens and elevates when
the principal idea of the word requires it. The fundamental
tone of discourse is the -n-povLoSia fiapua (accentus gravis) ;
the strengthening and elevation of it wpocrtodia o^eta, called
also Kvpiog rovog (accentus acuius). As the written characters
of European nations incline from the top towards the right
side of the writer, the fundamental tone, accentus gravis, is
designated by a straight stroke Q inclining to the left of the
writer, and the strengthened or elevated tone, accentus acutus,
as the natural opposite, by a straight stroke f) inclining to the
right of the writer. But it is evident that the actual designation
of all syllables by the proper accent would be superfluous. If
the syllable which receives the strengthened accent be ascer-
tained, we know that all the rest must have the weaker or funda-
mental tone. Consequently it would be superfluous to write
GsoSwpoc, OfoSwpoc being sufficient.
Note. — The signs of the accent (' v - , &c.) were invented
or first used by the Grammarian Aristophanes of Byzantium,
about 200 years before Christ; conf. Arcadius (properly Hero-
dianus) EEcpl tovujv p. 186. Villois. Prolegom. ad Schol. Venet.
p. XI. But the accent itself is as old as the language. Hence
CHEEK ACCENTUATION. 3
the signs by which Aristophanes preserved the old living ac-
cent are of the highest importance. After him the Gram-
marian ^Elius Herodianus chiefly cultivated the doctrine of
the accent (about 200 years after Christ, under the Emperor
Marcus Antoninus, to whom he dedicated his TrpoacoSia icaZo-
XiktJ), and has been followed by all subsequent Grammarians.
To us, therefore, the extract of Arcadius from Herodian's ica-
SoXlki'i, combined with an extract of Porphyry from the same
(V. Villoison Anecd. Gr. II. p. 103. Conf. praef. ad Theodos.
Gramm. p. XV.), is of the greatest consequence as historical
material for a doctrine of accents. But for such a doctiine,
founded upon principles, nothing considerable is afforded by
any of the Greek Grammarians. Hence we owe many rules
to Herodian, which merely pertain to it without being given
by the nature of the thing ; among these probably may be
classed a great many distinctions which the accent indicates
in the signification of individual words.
§.3.
First principal Law. — In the Greek language only one of
the three last syllables of a word is capable of the strengthened
tone — accent us acutus, npocrqSia o£aa.
Primitive languages of intellectual nations, like the Greeks,
are formed from roots, or, as they are more properly termed, pri-
mitive words. These are monosyllabic. But in the simple idea
which they designated they were capable of nearer definition.
Such definitions could be attached locally either to the beginning
or end of the word, or to both at the same time. A word there-
fore which had its principal idea in the middle, and the defini-
tion of subordinate ideas at the beginning and end, would be
one formed from its root with the utmost possible perfection.
In the Greek language, when such a word becomes longer than
trisyllabic by composition with new ideas, the old law remains
in reference to the accent. If this were to recede beyond the
third syllable the whole word would to the hearing be necessarily
divided into two or more. Hence Evhivvfior, "AXtfxovaiog. Add,
moreover, that an equilibrium must exist between the accented
syllable and the unaccented ones which follow. This equilibrium
4 GREEK ACCENTUATION.
would be destroyed if more than two were to follow the accented
syllable (i. e. the syllable distinguished by the acutusj, as two
only are able to produce it.
Note. — Compare Theodos. Grammat. p. 48. 27. oi)$£fiia
\£%ig kWrivticrj ^E/nariKrj, air\rj 9 TrpwroTvirog, %e\u virepfiaiveiv
rrjv TpurvWafiiav.
§.4.
Second principal Law.— The accent falls either on the
syllable containing the principal idea of the whole word or on
the one which is the nearest to the syllable of the principal idea
that the number of syllables in the word generally will permit.
To find the syllable of the principal idea, the study of the
etymological part of the language is indispensable. In a simple
uncompounded word, that called the root is the principal idea,
as the first syllable in ypafifxa. In compound words the added
word forms for the accent the principal idea, because it gives to
the whole its shade, its definiteness, its distinction. Thus in irpo-
ypafifia the principal idea is now in Trpo, and y pap/ma, in reference
to the accent, becomes subordinate, because the preposition irpo
gives to ypafifia its definite signification. In certain instances,
therefore, the above second principal law is to be applied, as e. g.
in ypafifxanov. For ypafi is also the principal idea in this dimi-
nutive; the accentuation ought therefore to beypafifiariov; but this
would be a violation of the first principal law : hence the accent
can only fall on the syllable which is the nearest possible to that
of the principal idea : consequently ypafif.ia.TLov or irpoypafxfia-
tiov, whereas according to the fundamental law, §. L, if this
were not limited by §. 3., they would necessarily be ypafifianov
and TTpoypafifiariov.
Note. — It must be observed, however, that in the Greek
language, with few exceptions, (but in the verb without ex-
ception), the accent can never pass beyond the first com-
pound : f'c, Trposg (first compound), not however (rvfnrpoeg (se-
cond compound), but avfiirpoeg. The first compound therefore
remains as the principal idea for the Greek accent.
GREEK ACCENTUATION. 5
§.5.
Third principal Law. — A syllable long by nature is equi-
valent to two syllables with respect to the time occupied in its
pronunciation; consequently, if the Jinal syllable of a word be
long by nature % the accent cannot stand on the third from
the end.
This law is founded upon the quantity, i. e. upon the longer
or shorter tarrying of the voice on the individual vowels of syl-
lables. Hence arise in the Greek language long and short syl-
lables, which, although themselves independent of accentuation,
nevertheless exercise an influence upon it. The Greeks took a
definite indivisible space of time, the smallest in which a syllable
could be pronounced. This in the language of grammar is called
mora, or ygovoq. Now if the voice be permitted to tarry on the
individual vowels of syllables longer than for the space of one
mora, it is easy to perceive that such a syllable may be divided
into two parts, by which it equals two simple syllables in the
length of pronunciation, and thus becomes a long syllable.
Hence the Greeks have for two of their vowels, the E and O
sounds, two different designations: eand o, the duration of which
in pronunciation equals a mora, i\ and w, when the tone dwells
so long upon e and o that the two vowels could be pronounced
twice in the time : H, therefore, always arises from two Es placed
together ; to from two Os placed together. Hence some old in-
scriptions have EE for H, and 00 for 12. (V. Villois. Anecd. Gr.
II. p. 124. Comp. however, Boeckh. corpus inscript. p. 60.). For
the longer duration of the three remaining vowels, a, i, and v, Greek
writing does not possess similar designations, and the usage of the
poets alone can here inform us in what words they are by nature
long or short. In older times the distinctions a, 1, u, and a, ?, v,
were employed. (Conf. Porphyr. ap. Villois. Anecd. Gr. II. p. 1 12.)
The third principal law necessarily follows therefore from the
nature of the thing itself. In 'Aptoro^avrjc the accent ought to
stand thus, 'A^toro^avric, because the syllables api?ro enlarge
and define the idea of $avr\Q : but the syllable rjg contains two
moras ; hence this last syllable being reckoned for two, the ac-
6 GREEK ACCENTUATION.
cent in "ApKTTo^avrjg would fall upon the fourth syllable, which
is a violation of the first principal law (§. 3.) ; consequently 'Apttx-
Totyavqg.
Here, however, two cases must be well attended to, in which
the last syllable of some words, although long according to quan-
tity, is considered as short for accentuation.
1. This is the case in the Attic and old Ionic declension,
wherein other dialects give o instead of w, e. g. -rroXewg (other-
wise 7roAsoe), IlrjArj'taSew (JEolic UrjXriiadao) ; here (o, when it
stands in the casal termination, (hence called w tttwtlkov by
Grammarians), is considered by the Attics and Ionians not as
really long, but approaching more to the short quantity, on
which account it must also be pronounced shorter. This is so
much the easier in those words in which a short syllable pre-
cedes the half long w, because then the two syllables are more
capable of being pronounced as one. Thus e. g. IlriXrjiaSeto,
MtviXuog, avd)jetov, e/jnrXewg, Svcrepwg. It must not be supposed,
however, that this union of the two syllables in pronunciation is
alone sufficient to explain the accent of these forms ; the chief
reason lies in the half length (the irrational length, V. Boeckh.
de metris. Pind. p. 39. Hermann, elem. doctr. metr. p. 20.) of w.
This alone can account for the accentuation of the Attic genitives
Xtw, rau), \dyw, veto, which, if w were really long, must neces-
sarily, according to §. 19. 2., be Atw, Acryw, vew, from the nomi-
natives XetLg, Taojg, \aywg, veiog. For the dative, in which t is
added, becomes again perfectly long, vuo, \stjj, &c.
Note. — This law must not be extended to Doric forms.
Here the accentuation is correctly Trora/nog, Trora/xw, worafiio,
TroTa/uLov. So e. g. Ilrivsiu), Theocrit. Id. I. 67.
2. Also the syllables terminating with the diphthongs ot and
m, when not closed by a consonant (as oiv, mv, oig, mg), are like
the Attic or old Ionic w considered short in accentuation. The
reason lies in the short pronunciation of these diphthongs, even
the oldest poets having allowed themselves to elide oi and m in
certain instances. (Conf. Spitzner de versu Graec. her. p. 163.
166.) The third person of the optative active in oi and at, how-
ever, always obtains as long, the reason of which is given in
GREEK ACCENTUATION. 7
treating of the verb. The same is the case with the adverb
oiKoi (properly ouc^). Comp. Apollon. de adv. p. 537.
Note 1. — oi and at at the end were long for the accent with
the oldest Dorians : thus they accented tyikoaocfrol, daipo/nivoi.
(V. Schsefer ad Greg. Corinth, p. 312.)
Note 2. — The shortening of w and of the diphthongs ot and
at for the accent may be cpmpared with the shortened r\ of the
Boeotians in ru7rrojurj for ru7rrojueu and \ty6f.itvr) for XeyojULEvai.
(S. adTheodos. p. 250.)
3. In enclitics long syllables are accounted short for accentua-
tion. S. §. 47. I.
§.6.
The quantity of the last syllable of a word is of importance to
the accent, but never the quantity of the penultimate syllable.
The reason is, that the last syllable of every word, on account of
the interval between different w T ords, requires the most definite
uninterrupted expression.
Note 1. — Hence the iambic rhythm (^ j_) is employed for
dialogue (diverbium), because this variation of accent w T as
most familiar to the Attic ear in common life. (Conf. Bceckh.
de metr. Pind. p. 53.)
Note 2. — It is usually assumed that length by position can
exercise no influence upon the situation of the accent. This
in general is the case, and is founded upon the nature of
position itself, which consists in nothing more than the in-
terruption occasioned by two consonants following a short
vowel, the pronunciation being necessarily so delayed by the
two consonants as to produce a long quantity. It must be
remarked, however, that in one instance position does influence
the accent ; for no word occurs in Greek, which terminating
with £ or \p can have the accent on the third syllable from
the end.
§.7.
The three principal laws given in §§. 3. and 4. are sufficient
for ascertaining the position of the accent in the oldest periods of
the Greek language. Thus the JColians, whose dialect must be
8 GREEK ACCENTUATION.
considered as the oldest * of the Greek dialects, and as that from
which the rest were formed, invariably accented according to those
three laws. In the whole of their dialect not a single word is to be
found accented on the last syllable, except the dissyllabic prepo-
sitions, as irapa, wept, viro f. But in prepositions this is easily
accounted for, because they are connected as closely as possible
with the following word, to which they refer. This mode of
accentuation among the iEolians therefore is not to be explained
by reference to the grave character of this tribe, as the old gram-
marians do, but from the thing itself. Hence they accented
/3oXXa, j3w/xoc, Gofyog, &c, because the principal idea of these
words lies in the accented syllable. The same old accentuation,
conforming to the sense, has been retained almost invariably by
the remaining dialects of the Greek language, 1. in the oldest
part of speech, the verb; 2. in the oldest nouns, the neuters;
3. in proper names, which belong to the oldest nouns; e. g.
ev7rci%r)Q is adjective, but Ev7reiSrig a proper name. But in other
words these dialects exhibit a remarkable deviation from the
oldest or iEolic usage, all endeavouring to place the accent on
the final syllables of words, even when these contain no principal
idea ; e. g. ayaSog, crotyog. This peculiarity of oxytoning can
only be explained historically ; for marking the last syllable of
a word with the accent, when the principal idea is not contained
in this syllable, is in every case an abandonment of the etymo-
logical signification of the word. This will be made more clear
in the following §§. by a comparison with modern languages.
§.8.
Those called the Roman languages, which are derived from
the Latin, have in their words mostly left the old radical syllable
* That the iEolic is the oldest of all the Greek dialects is evident from this alone,
that it possesses no dual either in the noun or verb (V. T^ieodos. p. 210.) For the
dual is only a mutilated form of the plural, which subsequently was assigned its
definite use as dual, it naturally having appeared unnecessary to employ two different
forms for the designation of the same thing. See Buttm. Gr. Gr. I. p. 137-
f SeeApollon. Dysc. Synt. p. 309. This the Latins have retained. Conf. Priscian.
p. 1300. Putsch.
GREEK ACCENTUATION. 9
of the Latin unchanged, and merely furnished this with ter-
minations, which may be considered as the only part be-
longing to them. Now it is remarkable that the languages
spoken of, particularly the French, are accustomed to throw the
accent upon these terminations, their only property in the word,
because the etymological root, borrowed from the Latin, must in
its original signification and nature remain entirely unknown to
them. Thus the French form from fraternitas fraternite, from
conscriptio conscription, with the accent placed upon the last
syllable, which is their own property in the word. A similar
abandonment of the etymology of a word occurs in German
substantives with the termination ei, as Malilerei, Reiterei. The
syllable ei comes originally from the Greek and Latin ia, as
Melodei from jUfX^Sta, Abtei from abbatia, Klerisei, Tyrannei,
&c, and the Germans have now transferred the accent to the
syllable ei their property in these foreign words. This has been
extended even to other words of really German origin, as in the
above-mentioned Reiterei, Mahler ei. The preceding may suffice
to explain historically the accentuation of many Greek words,
which appears to violate the three principal laws.
§.9.
The later dialects, Doric, Ionic, Attic, bear the same relation,
in respect of the accentuation of many words, to the oldest
dialect, the iEolic, as the Roman languages to their parent, the
Latin. Hence the Attic dialect accents, e. g. fiovXri, fiwfiog,
(TO(p6g, where the iEolic had j3oXXa, /3w/xoc, cr6ai\u) (from (piXiw is not pos-
sible. The Romans in this resemble the Greeks : disco, di-
dici, tango, tetigi.
Note 2. — 'Exp^v has no augment, but merely a prefix of e
for the sake of euphony (as in k\^k and x$ce) ; otherwise it
must have been sxpriv, an( ^ even then there would have been
no reason for the paragogic v ; l\oi\v is an old infinitive,
used as an adverb. V. Theodos, p. 218. So to \9^ v in Eurip.
Conf. Eustath. ad Iliad, p. 1179. 38. "E^p*? stands in Apol-
lonius for expw^^n^* There is here therefore no anomaly
of tone.
2. It is evident, that in compounds the added word, which
enlarges the idea of the simple verb, does not cany its accent
beyond the syllable, which possessed it before the composition.
Consequently o^ec, liricrx^ J no ^ hrKr-^Q ; ^og, airodog ; not
airodog. Also not Karacr^ 6 ? rrapaax^, but /caracr^Cj ira^atj^Q ; or
at the most, Karaarxs, TrapaGyz, as Hesiod. Sc. H. 446.,. liriax^y
unless here cVic^s, from iTrio-^w, be more correct.
Note. — A recession of the accent to the Otherwise unac-
cented first syllable of a compound occurs in other words,
namely, in substantives when the second word has suf-
fered syncope : Qeoyvig (for Oeoyovig), eTrnrXa (for kir'nrXoa),
Xeifiappog, QeoicXog, 'EtsokAoc, AoavicXog. The adjectives in
such a case retain the old tone ; Kanovooi, kclkovoi, &c. Hence
the accentuation of veoyvog, from veoyovog, instead of vtoyvog,
is remarkable. On Karaayz see Jacobs ad Achill. Tat. p. 729.
Matthise, Eur. Tr. 82.
8. Lastly, it must be observed, as has already been laid down
§. 4. Note, that the accent is never placed beyond the first com-
position, and, therefore, never beyond an existing augment.
Hence fcar£l-
%ov, tvevSov, and iraoiZov. This is the accentuation to be fol-
lowed even in Homer, to whom the forms IkclSiZov and Ikci^to
are not unknown. For although the former (Od. XVI. 408.) can
be removed, yet the latter remains as sufficiently old. Hymn, in
Bacch.
That forms like icazripEv, fiiyripav, &c. present nothing remark-
able or appertaining to this place, is evident, although the Schol.
Venet U. XIV. 171. unnecessarily makes express mention that
these forms must be proparoxytone.
b. Monosyllabic verbal forms by nature long and without a
connective vowel, take the circumflex, (particularly if the aug-
ment be omitted) : arij (tWrj), 0cij (tyZyi), (3ij (f/3»j), yvCo (tyino).
On the contrary, the short plural forms >jc 2. pens.
conj. aor. 2.
Note, — The Dorians do not appeal to have regarded the
16 GREEK ACCENTUATION.
augment as a composition enlarging the sense ; for they ac-
cented tyayov, eXzyov, Irpi^pv, ecrracjav, Ifyaaav. Conf. Gregor.
Corinth. Schaef. p. 317. 657. Phavor. p. 611. 5. But as the
augment manifestly arose out of the reduplication, the common
accentuation is more consistent.
Peculiarity of Mode.
§• 14.
1. Optative. — The terminations oi and at in the third person
sing, optat. act. are (contrary to §. 5. 2.) considered as by nature
long in accentuation : KaraXaVoi. The reason is, that these ter-
minations are formed by contraction, e. g. apnaZoi from apTra-
Zoie, apiraaai from apTra£\ov. But being subsequently regarded as a particle it
lost its original accent, like \9^ v - ^ mi ght also, in early
times, be pronounced 6$Aov, as aor. 2. In each case o^tXov
is a participle, not an indicative, as is usually supposed. This
can only be on^eXov.
b. Composition, and therefore an enlargement of the sense, has
no influence upon a change of the accent in any oxytone parti-
ciple, but the syllable accented in the nominative retains the
tone through all the cases : SoKri^dg, So/ojS^vroc, SoKrjSlvra.
Note. — (18/cwv cannot be considered as a participle. On
EviXSuv see §. 15. 2. b. Eustath. ad. II. p. 1097. 63.
c. The genitive plur. of the fern, participle is perispome (see
§. 19. first decl. 2.), only when the nominative of the feminine has
a syllable more than that of the masculine ; e. g. ra^ae, ra\-
Sacra (rax^acrwv). Comp. §. 28. 2. Otherwise the genitives of
. the masculine and feminine are accented alike, ^cuvojutvoc, $ai-
vofxivr} (gen. pi. (f>aivo/j.£vtov).
GREEK ACCENTUATION. 17
Note 1. — Only Doric genitives in av are always perispome
even in these latter forms of the second declension : aivo-
fisvav. This likewise holds of all adjectives.
Note 2. — Proper names formed from participles in ofiEvog
and ajiEvog are mostly oxytone : Scu^ojuevoe, y Op\ofj.evog, 'A/ao - -
ay£ to the
Attics (Bekker. Anecd. p. 1428). Apollonius appears to have
oxytoned dSi also as imperative of the aor. 2. (Theocrit. Id.
22. 56.), while as pres. Herodian makes it paroxytone, or rather
properispome, Draco, p. 58. "Ide and AajSf, when used in an
emphatic sense, are paroxytone. iEsch. Eum. 127. Xdfie, Xdfia,
Xa'j3f, Xaj3£, ippdZov.
GREEK ACCENTUATION. 19
The imperative mid. belongs hereto, yet so that the last
syllable is perispome : yevov, ttvZov, fiaXov, Idov. The last,
when having the force of an interjection, becomes oxytone,
according to the analogy of lov, which was also lov. It is peri-
spome when it denotes the actual contemplation of an object.
Hence, l£ov, H tart, and wg ypacpEvg cnroaTa^dg i$ov /jle Kavd-
Zpviicov in Aristoph. Eq. 590. Soph. O. C. 470.
has Iviyicov, and 147. 'Uov, which Elmsley has changed into
EvEyicov and lkov.
II. In the infinitive. Here the accented syllable invariably
takes the circumflex : tt&uv, elnuv, dyayelv, irerr&tiv, Siyuv,
ct^eZuv. The infinitive mid. of all verbs falls under this rule,
receiving the accent on the connective vowel, TrETTiZiaSai, dya-
yia^ai, yEvtaXai, TpaTTEG^ai, alaZEaSai, Xlteg^ul, dpEG^ai ; also
ipiodtti ought to be so accented. V. Phavorin. p. 1186. 44.
Note. — An observation of the Scholiast on Aristoph. Nub.
38. is remarkable: K9ra$ap$FeXv ol 'Arruco) ttuoo^vvovgl Kara-
QapSuv. So positive a declaration ought to make us cautious
in individual accentuations, even such as Ziyuv, g^'Suv.
c -2
20 OREEK ACCENTUATION.
But it is questioned, whether the Scholiast has not here con-
founded KaraSapSuv and KartSapSai (V. Phavor.). Also a
passage in ^Esch. Pers. 968., where iTravipofiat stands, might
cause a doubt, whether tpecrSai is not correct, as well as tp£-
viov and KaraTrifyvwv (as Aristarchus accented, while
Tyrannio on the contrary made them oxytone ; see Schol.
Venet. II. XVI. 827.), as they are manifestly aorists, there
is much room for doubt.
Note 2. — 'Iwv, KLibv, iwv, agreeably to all analogy, ought to
be accented i'wv, klwv, zwv, as properly aorists of this kind
could not be formed. Nevertheless tradition and the analogy
of tthLv are followed.
Note 3, — The old proper names "Itov, 'A/£0iW, c Y7T£ptwv,
AafiLov, form an exception, according to §. 7., as they have
only v for the characteristic, and not vr, like the aorist
participles. Likewise TLviXSwv, as a proper name, belongs
in its accentuation hereto. Conf. Herodot. IV. 162.
Note 4. — The accentuations crx^wv and o-x^etv, instead of
, SaKio, &c. for there is no contraction in these
aorists. Likewise in the compounds with t^w no contraction is
to be thought of, °"X^? °"XV> because (except the enclitic
forms) no indicative, conjunctive, or optative, appears as
oxytone but always barytone; as soon as composition takes
place, the accent naturally recedes, Karaayji), Karaoke* Karaa^y,
or liriairb), iiricnnQQ, not Karaa\Co, Karacr^g, Karacr^y (exactly as
$r\v, $ijc, and r\ connective vowel of the
conjunctive, and rat termination. In rt^w/xat, nay even in
aQiw/iai a remnant of the root is preserved in $ and i ; but in
a/icu alone musl always he properispome. For
this I find no express testimony in grammarians. On the other hand, there is no
internal reason, why, like ri^io/mi, Kipuivrai (Homer, II. IV. 2G0.), we should not
also aceent lOTWjtMIt, as the MSS. BO often give this aeeenluatien. V. Poppo. proleg.
ad Time. I. p. 229. Herodot VI. •>:>.
24 GREEK ACCENTUATION.
vowel, v termination). This tj occurs now only in the active
forms, where therefore the accentuation tl^eltov, Tt&eifiev, tiSeIts,
icttcutov, «arafyz£v, iGTcure, SiSolrov, Sl^ol/ulev, SiSoits, is to be ex-
plained as a syncope from t&eiyitov, r&eiiifiev, &c. V. Eustath.
ad Odyss. p. 1907. 46. But the accentuation of the third person
plural t&eIev, larauv, SiSoUv, is remarkable ; for here that vowel
is really extant, only shortened as e, between the modal character-
istic and termination. For this intermediate vowel also appears
as e in the active forms of the common conjugation of the optative
1. in the natural length of ol (e. g. AeiVoI from Xeittoie, see the
note on Aristotle's Polit. p. 333.) and of at (e. g. tvx^ol from tv-
ipme) for the accent; 2. as really visible in the third person plur.
(XdwoiEv) and in the third person sing, of the Attic forms in eie,
(e. g. rvxptie). Consequently the third person plur. ought pro-
perly to be accented tiSelev, 'laraiEv, Sidoiev. But in earlier
times this i\ or £ must also have been used in the passive forms ;
at least the a in the Ionic forms of the third person plur. jdovXoi-
a-To, yzvaai-a-ro, tends to shew this. The omission of such an
originally extant intermediate vowel can alone explain the ac-
centuations t&elo, rt^aro, t&eIvSe, t&eIvto, tcrraXo, larratTO, Si-
SoTo, &Sotro, &c. (V. Arcad. p. 171. 27.)
But besides this regular accentuation the Attics have also
forms, which no longer recognize the previous existence of an
intermediate vowel, consequently draw the accent as far back as
possible. This accentuation is confined solely to those forms,
the active present of which is no longer extant : Svvcllto, ett'ht-
raiTo, ovolto, &c. are never found as properispome. V. Arcad.
p. 172.; on the contrary in Xaraftat the accentuation torcuo, v hj-
tcllto, which no longer regards the intermediate vowel, is peculiar
to the Attics alone.
Note 1. — The Homeric forms of the optative XeXvto and
daivvro are according to the above rule correctly properispome.
V. Schol. Venet. II. XXIV. 665., XeXvto and Saivvro would
be an abandonment of the optative, whose iota is absorbed
by the kindred v on account of the following r; for the diph-
thong vi never occurs before a consonant.
Note 2. — All forms which in the optative take the connective
vowel instead of the verbal characteristic are accented accord-
GREEK ACCENTUATION. 25
ing to the rule of verbs with the connective vowel : liriSoivro,
7rp6ZoiTo, &c. Only in the aor. 2. oflrjfii, such an accentuation is
objectionable on the same grounds as have been adduced above
against the conjunctives TrporjvSe, irpowjiaL, instead of Trpofjo-^e,
(Conf. Arist. Vesp. 434.) Trpowpai. Therefore in Thucyd. I.
120. and elsewhere forms as Trpooivro for ttqouvto or at most
wpoolvTo, &c. ought not to be tolerated.
Note 3. — On the identity of rj and £ as intermediate vowel be-
tween the modal characteristic and termination, see a remark-
able expression of Herodian in Schol. Venet. II. XIV. 241.
4. The imperative of these verbs follows the general rules of ac-
centuation. That there is nothing uncommon in the accentua-
tions aVoSoc, 7T£pi^£C) &c. has already been remarked, §. 13. 2.
However the imperative of the aor. 2. mid. has in composition
this peculiarity, that the accent recedes in the second person
singular, only when the preposition is dissyllabic, but that when
it is monosyllabic the circumflex stands on the radical word :
TTapaSov, Kara^ov, diroSov ; but dtyov, 7rpoov, irpodov, IvSov,
(Aristoph. Eq. 51.) ; although resolved they would be azo, 7rpo-
£o<7o. This accentuation, therefore, ranks with that mentioned
in §. 15. b. 1. V. Phavor. p. 1571. 1. But it only happens in
the assigned second person ; otherwise the rule is always fol-
lowed : TrpoevSov, TrpotaSe, &C.
5. The infinitive active in the present and aorist 2. and the
infinitive of the aorist 2. mid. are regularly accented on the cha-
racteristic vowel : riStvai, lardvai, SiSovat, 7rapadovvai, d.TroS£(T%ai,
ta^ai, 7rpO£a£at, a7ro3odvrog), are paroxy-
tone according to §. 7. On the latter see Eustath. Od. p.
1390. 33.
Note 3. — The characteristic vowel in all participles, being
short by nature, can only take the circumflex in the dative
1 Finally from this evai was formed by apocope the common termination of the
infinitive iv ; ru7rr-£-ev, tvtttuv. Evai as termination still occurs in the inf. aor.
pass. TVr)g and 0>Je, to distinguish it from the
conjunctive X9V-
II. On the accentuation of the per/, pass, and of the aor. 1.
and 2. pass, of regular verbs.
A. 1. The conjunctive and optative perf. pass, of kekxhjuch,
Kitc\i]/naL and jui/nvij/im, have the accent on the radical syllabic
(kTCI, tcAf, fJ-Vd) l KEKtCj/ICLL KEKTrj KEKT1}Tai, KEKTl]fll]V KEKT1JO KZKTrJTOy
fizfivCofAai fXtfJLvrj fiEfivyJTai, fXEfjivyfjniv fiE/mvyo /nE/xvrJTo, &c. The
conjunctive is thus accented, because it cannot be formed with-
out a connective vowel ; therefore in this mode a contraction
takes place of the radical vowel (Kt/crawjuat KEKrarj, Ion. kekte\i,
KEKTariTcu into KtKTtofiai KEKTtj KEKTtJTai) with the connective vowel,
and this renders the accentuation with the circumflex necessary
(Conf. Theodos. Bekker. p. 1037.); that these forms do not relin-
quish the radical vowel in the conjunctive, is shewn by the Ionic
conj. fiEfivE(LnE^a in Herodot. VII. 47.; for here according to the
Ionic usage a is changed into e, as in oqeoj from opaio. In the .op-
tative, on the couti dry, KEKT)jfj.7)v kektijo kektijto no connective vow el
has been added, but only the modal characteristic i between the
root and termination : consequently in the optative no proper con-
traction is observable, as in the conjunctive, and hence one should
expect iclicrpo K&ryro \ But here also the traditional acccntua-
1 \ihl tln> accentuation Buttmann prefers. Ausf. Or. Gr. I. p. 440. ad Soph
Phil 119. Hermann t%r\Ti, Tvtg the accentuation should be hpdcjiSQ (for IrpdcpY}^, as vvpia-
$eg. Dor. for ^w, tvtteu) ru7rw), the optative (tv^Seitiv, tu7T£itjv ; formed by
annexing the modal characteristic iota, and that intermediate
vowel r\ of which mention has been made above) and the parti-
ciple (tv(J)S£vtq, whence tv^elq tv%evtoq) ; 2. as long, after the
analogy of Ti^m\fii TiSrjg, in the indicative (etvQSyjv, ItvQ&tiq), the
imperative [tv^t]tl Tvirr\Ti), and the infinitive (rvtpSrivai rvirrivat) ,
consequently the infinitive is always properispome and the par-
ticiple oxytone.
i In the edition of /Esch. Pers. by Lange and Pinzger it is remarked p. 268.
that forms like fitjitv must be paroxytone, because they are syncopised from [itS-
it](7av; but fxtSitv or ludvSrjv in Homer cannot on any account be considered as
syncope, the termination guv being manifestly a later prolongation instead of v.
30 GHEEK ACCENTUATION.
§•17.
Peculiarities in some Contract Verbs.
I. A peculiar resolution of contract verbs in aw and ow occurs
with the Epic authors, which can only be satisfactorily explained
by a change of the radical and connective vowels. In £i»^ran
instead of £i>x £r « £i nothing has taken place, except the adoption
of an a instead of the usual connective vowel e ; therefore zv\ E ~
raa stands for si^raat. In this case the connective vowel has
assimilated to the radical vowel (a) ; in opoio, yeXocovTsg on the
contrary the radical vowel to the connective vowel. This changed
radical vowel conforms in quantity entirely to the exigency of
the verse : rifidjuaa instead of 77j3oa>o-a, because this latter would
not have suited a dactylic metre ; there is nothing uncommon
therefore in the accentuation of this epic resolution of contract
verbs.
Note 1 . — The other mode of explaining this so called Epic
prolongation (see Buttmann, Ausf. Gr. Gr. I. p. 149.) is beset
with difficulties. It assumes that a contraction really preceded:
ivx^rdei £i/^r«, but that in Epic the same letter, which fonns
the contraction, was again prefixed : ti^raa. In this case
how can the accentuation be explained, which ought necessa-
rily to be evx^raa ? But a stronger argument against it is to
be drawn from the remark of grammarians (V. Schol. Venet.
II. VI. 268), that in nvxtrdaaSai the a of the syllable ai\(eo, tyikeov, and then contracted once more
tyiXov ; but in Epic authors examples occur, in which the con-
nective vowel is contracted with the characteristic vowel :
vital vuai, fiv^kai [iv&siai, without occasioning any change in
the laws of accentuation. Hereto belongs bpijai, from bga.Hu
opam, and Ion. £ instead of a, opijat. See Buttmann, Ausf. Gr.
Gr. p. 505. Phavorin. p. 1574. 33. Also the infinitives in Sv :
bpuv (6oa££i>, bpaev, bpav) belong to this class.
3. The Dorians take the syllable aa as temporal characteristic
of the fut. I. act. and mid. ; hence in this future there is a con-
traction, (pev^Co, (ptv^tv/uiaif ev%tiTai, icrauTai. V. Schol. Venet.
11. II. 393. The Attics also use these forms, TrXevaov/jiai,
Tr\zvaticr%ai.
§. 18.
Syncopised Forms.
Syncopised forms retain the accent on the place which was
accented before the syncope. These comprise the forms already
treated of, as tetuju/xevoc, laTavat, &c. but particularly also the
following : —
1. Those verbs contract in which the connective vowel is
omitted according to the custom of the Ioniaus : avaicoivto (for
avanOLvieo), [ivSiai (for fivSteai), tirotio (for e7tor}y6-'i, (prjyoX,
ultimately <£rrya>. On the contrary, the accusative and vocative
retain in all numbers and cases the accent of the nominative,
which likewise remains in all numbers the same as in the sin-
gular. The reason is, that the accusative and vocative were
originally not different from the nominative.
GENERAL OBSERVATIONS.
I. Substantives constantly preserve the accent on the same
syllable in all cases, except the genitive plural. Thus dyyeXta,
dyytXiai, a^vtj, d(j>vai. Hence is explained the law referred to,
§. 32., on substantives vf^tXijyeptra, &c.
Note 1. — Ionic forms in rj, which terminate in a in the
Attic dialect, make an apparent exception : Upar\ (Attic hoaa)
gives hpam in the plural, not Upaai. See Schol. Venet. ad
II. XIV. 351. Eustath. p. 991. 24.
Note 2. — According to Arcadius, p. 133, the Attics drew
back the accent in some substantives, the same as in adjectives :
GREEK ACCENTUATION. 33
t]/j.Epai (-qjutpa), EV7rpa£,iai, rifiwpiai, atrial, bfiikiai, rpayySiai,
KWfiy^iai. Choeroboscus in Bekker. Anecd. p. 1254. states
that this was done merely by the later Attics.
2. The genitive plural of the first declension terminated in the
older dialects in eojv and atov. The Attics Contract the two
syllables into one (wv), whence arises the general rule, that the
genitive plural of the first declension is circumflexed, Iwv and
awv giving wv or wv. Except, however, the paroxytoned
genitives of the words 'Err\aiai, d kcuXvttjc, jxr\vvTr]g,
Note. 1. — In composition they retain their accentuation.
Except Kpirrig, which, when compounded with any other
word than a preposition, draws back the accent : ovEipoKpirr^g,
SiKaioKpiTtig. But TrpoKptrrig, viroKpiTi'ig, &c. Properly it
belongs to h.
Note 2. — KvfiepvrjTrig, at(xujuv?jr»?C> dXr)rrig, yajiiTr\g (in a
dialect not Attic ; see Schol. Venet. II. III. 272.), and all in
KTr\g and 7rrrjc are paroxytone. Also >(X>'rn?c, as euphemism
GREEK ACCENTUATION. 35
for thief, is paroxytone, i. e. it follows the older accentuation.
See Eustath. p. 1889. 2. rapaKT^g is oxytone in Lycophron
and the later authors. Eustath. II. p. 873. 16. Also pavTT)g, dyvprr\g, $iaXTr\g, ttXvttjq (irXyvto), ttotyiq (ttivu)),
ClK.aLOKOLTriQ (hCOLVLo).
Xote. — The Attics have such forms also oxytone : xpaXri'ig,
Ka^apHjg, dfjLvvrijg, (f>aidpvvTi]g, ttoiklXti^q, tcaXXvvn'ig, tvSvv-
ti'iq, irpavvriiQ ; see Etym. M. v. 'HpaicAfjc.
i. All verbals, not derived like verbal adjectives from the
3 pers. sing. perf. pass., are paroxytone : d^oXiay^jg, oiKir^g,
VTrrjpirrjg, i)\(Tfig 9 epyaTrjg, ^vXap^ng, yevijrr^g (member of
a ylvog), Trap^EvoiriTrrjg, Trai$OTpi{3r)g, f5i(3XtoTrti)Xr)g.
Note 1. — The accent favours the reading ytv/jrrje, while
yEvvt]Ti]g (father) is correctly oxytoned. In like manner
7rp£(jfivTrig and TTpEafievTrig.
Xote 2. — The old forms of these substantives in a (a
remnant of which is still extant in some vocatives), preserve
the accentuation of the forms in r\g ; see §. §. 29. 32. Hence
i7nrr]XuTa (iTnniXaTrig), al\jj.ijTa {al^Qii)Tr\g) 9 ro^ora (ro^OTrjg),
r}\ira (?'j^£rrjc), SeairoTa (SeoTroYijc). Adjectives, however, of
the same form deviate from this accentuation. Among these,
vzfeXrjysplTa must not be classed, since it so designates the
character of Zeus, as to produce a clear recognition of him
without the addition of his name, in the same manner as
yau'ioxpg, £Karrj/3oAo£, &c, when standing independently,
may be considered as substantives ; comp. §. 35. Note 3.
Aca7ronjc in the vocative draws its accent upon the first syl-
lable : Stair ora.
§. 21.
Feminine* in a.
I. « after vowels.
a. Those contracted from aa into a are all perispome: Wlrijva
36 GREEK ACCENTUATION.
('ASrjvaa), /jlvu. Consequently when resolved they are naturally
paroxytone : Naucrucaa, iXda.
h. Of those in aia :
1. The^ dissyllables are properispome : yata, aia, jmaia, ypala.
2. Polysyllables on the contrary, when lengthened like ad-
jectives from forms in rj and a, are paroxytone : 'ASrjvcu'a,
svvaia, rrvpfiaia, KaXafiaia, ua, zvaifiua, dirtbXsia, vyieia, cu/cXaa. On losing
the characteristic s, they become paroxytone: JLvTv\ia, clv-
SaS'ia, &c.
Note. — The older Attics, prior to the time of Euclid, con-
sidered the a as long, and therefore paroxy toned these forrns :
ctXrjSeia, muXe'ia (see iEsch. Sept. 685.), tvicXriav epeig,
Aristoph. Av. 604. 731. vyieia, Eq. 1185. Ivrepoveia, although
Herodian held this word to be usually proparoxytone. See
the Scholiast on this passage of Aristophanes ; comp. Chcero-
boscus ap. Bekk. Anecd. p. 1314. Eustath. Od. p. 1579. 27.
2. Concretes in ud are likewise proparoxytone : fiaaiXud
(queen, from fiaaiXsvg), Upeia (priestess, from hptvg). 'AXfS-
dvSptid, IlrjvsXoTraa, GaXaa, Kpdvtia, rreXeia, TpvdXtia, KaXau-
ptia, IlijU7rX£m, 7ravaK£(a.
GREEK ACCENTUATION. S7
3. Abstracts in Bid, derived from verbs in euw, are paroxy-
tone : fiaviXda (kingdom, /3aa-t\£vw), hpda (priesthood, upevw),
iKErda, 7roXtr£ta, dpawETda, SovXda, epfirjvda, vr\arda, ■wpoGrarda,
dXida, d\r)Tua, yppda* arparda, TraiSda, %oda (Aristoph. Th.
180).
Note. — According to Ammonius, fiaaiXda (kingdom) was
also properispome. It is then, however, evidently neuter of
fiacriXdog, the older form for fiacriXzioQ.
4. Concretes in eta are oxytone : £«a, xP a « (Philem. p. 197.),
a : on ty aroa remains
oxytone. This peculiarity of accentuation extends also to
other oxytones : aupd, aipa, Sapa, Sepa. Eust. II. p. 914. 23.
Also the Attic Zwn, Ionic £017, may be referred hereto 1 but
the proparoxytone then becomes oxytone ; Karappori, tmxpod,
Trzpiwvoi}.
g. Those in via draw the accent as far back as possible, a
being always short : jxvla, opyvia, ayvia, vtKvia, ElXd^vta,
'QpaSruta, Ovla.
Note. — In all these forms (also in those under/) the oldest
Attics held a for long. Hence they accented dyvoia, veKvia,
&c. Mrjrpvid, opyvid, and dyvid, are oxytone with the Attics,
but in Homer follow the general accentuation, II. XXIII.
327. XX. 254.
2. Those in va are paroxytone : o^vd, Kapvd, KtoSvd. Mdvrvd
(Mantua) alone is accented according to the example of the
Romans. The others are said to terminate properly in ?j.
h. The few in wa (for the most part properly feminines of
adjectives in diog) are paroxytone : wa, fivwa, Miviaa. The
forms 7ro)d and (rnod are not good Greek, and dXi*)d given in
Lexicons for dXwri does not occur.
II. a after liquids.
a. Those in Xa, jua, and va, (the Doric r\ dXaXd excepted), are
never oxytone. When the penultimate is long, they draw the
accent as near as possible to the syllable containing the idea :
if the penultimate be short, consequently a long, they are par-
oxytone : KvXXa, KiXXa, fi&XXa, d/miXXa, deXXa, SvsXXa, TeXI-
ai\\a, juajccXXa, dfnaXXa, IlspmXXa (Herod. 6. 66.), c^'keXXo,
yavXa, iravXa, dvdiravXa, ToXfia, Staiva, vaiva, Aaicaiva, Spdicatva,
vspdiraiva, XvKaiva, Sicnroiva, fiovTreiva, yivva, AiKTvvva, Mr'j-
Sv/uiva, Hfivpva, Kpto^va, fiipifxva, Trpvfxva, &%i$va. Eust. II. p.
694. 14.
Note. — The Latin names in ma are in Greek properispome :
2a/3n;a, fyavvriva. Arcad. p. 96. QiXofii)Xd is paroxytone.
b. 1. No noun in pa is oxytone if a be short. Polysyllables
in pa, when the penultimate is long, and the last syllabic short,
draw the accent as near as possible to the syllable containing
GREEK ACCENTUATION. 39
the idea : apovpa, fxa\aioa, vpa, iiyKVpa, oXXvpa, acpvpa.
Note, — Xouns in rpa, Spa, Spa have all a long: therefore
KXvTai/ULViiGTpa, 'HXsKrpa, Xovivrpa, KaaavSpa, kv&pa, icaSt-
Spa, dXivSriSpa, KoXu//j3//3"pa. Only A{]/j.r}Tpa(r)) and %opa), dyopd (dyeipu)), |3opa, x a P">
0opa, dpd, u)od, Sopd, Kovpd, ovpa, cretpd, povpd, TrXevpd, Xevpd.
They retain their accent in composition.
6. Of dissyllables those are properispome which have a diph-
thong in the first syllable, but those which have a vowel long by
nature in the first syllable are paroxytone : fiolpa, alpa, zvarpa,
ort7pa, T Hpa, \vpa, X^pa, wpa.
Note 1. — All in avpa are paroxytone : avpa (Avpa proper
name, Etym. M.), cravpa, Xavpa. S^upa is properispome.
Coin}), llerni. de em. rat. p. 425. Schol. Aristoph. Ran. 313.
c. No substantive in {] (pit).
Note 2. — In composition these words retain their accent :
tojulyi, iTTLTOfJii]. Only dvappori, v^poppori, KaXXippori, olvo\6ri,
tcrroSoKij, Kairvo^oKX] draw it back. See Eustath. II. p, 992. 57.
Schol. Venet. II. XIV. 372. According to this is Elmsley on
Aristoph. Ach. 922. to be corrected.
II. 7} after vowels.
a. Those in aii and vr\ are paroxytone : Aavarj, Siyvri, dpvti,
Aifivri, xXeurj, keutj, Sevrj, $vri.
Note. — Skeu//, together with its compounds jcarao-KCu?/, &c.
and <$>vr], are oxytone.
b. Those in or) and wii are oxytone : j3oi), x°>'/> irvoi'i, £o»'j, Smi/,
lp(jt){) f a\(i)rj.
GREEK ACCENTUATION. 41
Note. — Got], Oivorj, and XXo?j, as proper names, are paroxy-
tone. On £ot? see the preced. §./. Note.
III. r\ after liquids.
a. 1. Those in Xr\ which have a diphthong in the penultimate
are oxytone : avXi), £uX?'?, dwsiXij, wraX?'/, ovXi] (scar).
Note. — OvXat (offering-barley) was barytone, but it is better
to class it also with oxytones. Conf. §. 30. II. a. §. 21. f. Note.
In like manner SdXrj, QovXrj, SouAtj. See Etym. M. v. Ei/Xcu.
Schol. II. Venet. XIX. 26. Buttmami, Lexil. 1. p. 194. Ac-
cording to Eustath. ad II. p. 1169. 39. ovXf] (offering-barley)
was oxytone, but ovXr) (xXatva) barytone.
2. Those in aXri, fXrj, tjXtj, oXtj, iXtj, vXri follow the general rule,
and are paroxytone : 7raXrj, ZdXr], 2£juA.t7, ayeXrj, ot/jXtj, ya^X?/,
fiapiXt}, [xvcFTiXri, acrj3oXi7, SeparoXr}, vXrj, kotvXti, ora^uXrj.
Note. — In those in oXrj the oxytones of I. b. are excepted.
2.Tci(pvXi] (bunch of grapes) is distinguished from ora^uXrj
(plummet) ; (pvXfj, 'AyyeXi], wavreXri (V. Steph. Byz. v.
'AyycXrj), ictQaXf], yap^r]Xi], X^M? SijA/j are oxytone.
3. Those in wXri are oxytone if they be not proper names :
iravtrtdXi], rep-rrcoXi], evxtoXi]. 'E/otwXrj is paroxytone as a proper
name, oxytone as an appellative.
b. Those in fir^, if not belonging to I. b., are paroxytone ac-
cording to the general rule : yvwpr), xaVjurj, aXprj, xa/ojurj, ckciXjut/,
KaXdfll], 2aftTJ, KVlJfXT], rj, Stpri, dSdpy,
K(')()rTr), au'Zii, a?dpi|, ydarpri, warpr}. Ka/j/j is oxytone for dis-
tinction from to K(i(»i ; in like manner dipn is distinguished from
IV. v after mutes.
(f. Those in /*]>;, 7)/, S»), (£>j), when not belonging lo I. />. arc
42 GREEK ACCENTUATION.
paroxytone according to the general rule : j3Xa/3rj, "Hj3rj, Xw/3*j,
7rayj?, rpvyrj, arfyrj, ^ov^ri, (tlStj, NcSij, 7rl^rj, o£*].
Note. — Sfyi] (