BV 4022 .B3 Copy 1 ^N ^DEQTJ^TE IMlIlSriSTRY, SERMON DELIVEKED BEFORE THE AMERICAN EDUCATION SOCIETY ANNIVERSARY MEETING IN BOSTON, MAY 25, 1869. BY REV. LEONARD BACON, D. D. BOSTON: PRESS OF T. R. MARVIN & SON, 131 CONGRESS STREET. 18 6 9. A.N A.DE3QTJ-A.TB: IVtlNISTR Y, SERMON DELIVERED BEFORE THE AMERICAN EDUCATION SOCIETY, ANNIVERSARY MEETING IN BOSTON, . MAY 25, 1869. BY REV. LEONARD BACON, D. D. BOSTON: PRESS OF T. R. MARVIN & SON, 131 CONGRESS STREET. 186 9. ^ ^3 n> SERMON. Acts xvi. 1-3.— Then came he to Derbe and Lystra : and behold, a certain disciple was there, named Timotheus, the son of a certain woman which was a Jewess and believed, but hie father was a Greek : which was well reported of by the brethren that were at Lystra and Iconium. Him would Paul have to go forth with him. 1 Tim. ii. 2.— And the things that thou hast heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also. The first of these passages gives us the fact that the Apostle Paul, having become acquainted with a young man of piety and promise, took him under his care and into his company, as an assistant in evangehcal labors, and, if we may so express it, as a theological student. It seems prqbable that the acquaintance com- menced at the Apostle's first visit in those parts, and that Timothy became a " disciple " as soon as the story of Jesus the Christ, was made known to him. We know that, afterwards, the intimacy and affection between those two persons became like the intimacy and affection between a father and his son. In the two Epistles from Paul to Timothy, which were written long afterward — one of them apparently the last production of the Apostle's pen — allusion is made to several of the particulars here mentioned. The young man's Jewish mother, Eunice, and his grandmother, Lois, are spoken of as persons of eminent faith ; and though his father was a Greek — probably a Pagan, and though, as following his father's nationality, he had not been circumcised, and had probably received a Greek education in respect to intellectual culture, the influence of his mother over him was such that from a child he had known the Holy Scriptures, and had thus been taught to fear and worship the true God. At Paul's second visit to Lycaonia, this young man " was well reported of by the brethren that were at Lystra and Iconium," who had seen his deportment as a Christian, and knew his qualifications for usefulness. Allusions in each of the two Epistles show that great expectations had been formed in regard to him ; and that he was set apart to the duties of an evan- gelist — as Paul himself had been set apart at Antioch to similar duties — by a solemn form dedicating him to God's service, and committing him to God's blessing. In one of those allusions, [1 Tim. iv. 14,] the Apostle tells him, *' Neglect not the gift that is in thee, which was given thee by prophecy, with the laying on of the hands of the presbytery." In another, he says, "This charge I commit to thee, son Timothy, according to the prophecies which went before on thee, that thou by them, [encouraged and stimu- lated by them,] mayest war a good warfare." As the Holy Spirit, moving on the minds of the prophets and teachers who, in the church at Antioch, ministered to the Lord and fasted, had said, " Separate me Barnabas and Saul, for the work whereunto I have called them ; " so the same Holy Spirit, moving on the minds of the brethren at Lystra, had said, with sufficient distinctness to sat- isfy the judgment of Paul, ^' Separate me Timothy for the work whereunto I have called him." In this way it was that the young man was invited and introduced to the ministry of the Gospel. The second of the two passages which have been read as the basis of this discourse, shows us that Paul, when the time of his departure was at hand, deemed it necessary to enjoin on Timothy the duty of bringing forward others, and introducing them to the same ministry, in essentially the same way. " The things which thou hast heard of me among many witnesses," — those facts and doctrines in which I have been your teacher, and which are not a secret system in the custody of a priesthood, but are the common property of all believers, so that a host of witnesses can testify what the things are which were committed to you — " the same commit thou to faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also." The duty thus enjoined on Timothy, rested not on him alone in his day, but on all to whom the same ministry had been committed, and on all Christians, according to their various oppor- tunities of cooperating for that object. As the brethren at Lystra and Iconium, many years before, had commended Timothy as a fit person for the ministry, and had taken pains, not without some sacrifice, to introduce him to the work, so it was the duty of the brethren, in every church, to find out and bring forward all who were divinely called to preach the Gospel. The same duty has rested on the ministry and the churches of each successive age, and is now resting upon us. To us in our several stations, and according to our several faculties and opportunities, it belongs in common with others, and in concert with others, to use all neces- sary measures for perpetuating in the churches, and for extending through the world, a fit and faithful ministry of the Gospel. In the interest of future ages, we are to see to it that the same things which the Apostles committed to those whom they introduced into the ministry of the Gospel, shall now and continually be committed to a competent number of true and trustworthy men, who in their turn shall be able to teach others also. We can hardly fail to observe that the Apostle's words imply a distinction between faithfulness and ability. It is not enough that the men to whom this ministry is committed, be '* faithful men;" they must be " able to teach others also." They must first he faithful, or, more properly, worthy of confidence^ and then they must be able or competent to the work of teaching, and therefore of defending the faith once delivered to the saints, so that others after them, through generations yet unborn, may keep up that only apostolical succession. Without attempting any extended illustration of the thought represented by that phrase, "faithful men," I may say that of course no man is worthy to be trusted with the ministry of the Gospel unless, in humble and penitent faith, he has received that Gospel into his own soul. How can any man be intrusted with the Gospel if he gives no evidence of having experienced its saving power ? Nay, such evidence on that point as might suffice for his admission to communion in the church, is not sufficient for his admission to participate in the ministry of the Gospel. The only true idea of the man worthy to be thus intrusted, is the idea of one who can be readily recognized as a man of God, a man of prayer, a man diligent in the self-discipline of the Christian life, a man growing in grace and in that knowledge of Christ which comes from the experience of his power to save. Such are the " faithful men," the men whose moral and spiritual qualities make them fit to be trusted with this ministry. Yet something more than this is necessary to a man in order that he may be fitly placed in the true succession from the Apostles. He must have, also, certain qualifications of a more intellectual sort, by which he may be " able to teach others." It is not a ruling and mediating priesthood, but a teaching ministry, which makes the apostolical succession. He who is to teach others, must be *' apt to teach." What is that aptitude or fitness ? First. In his capacity as a teacher — whether his work be that of a bishop or pastor, or that of an evangelist or minister at large — he must be able to command some measure of confidence and respect. Otherwise, who will listen to his teaching ? Who will be attentive to receive what he would communicate 1 Men may attend occasionally, or temporarily, on the exhibitions of one whose intellectual qualifications they do not respect or confide in — they may attend to be amused, or they may attend under the force of habit or of conscience, or they may attend because the public reli- gious assembly is a good thing in society — but they will not attend upon such an one to be taught by him. How important, then, is it that the ministers of the Gospel in any community be men whom that community shall be compelled to respect as men of competent intelligence for the work of public instruction ! Secondly. The man whom we can recognize as "able to teach others," must not only have, in general, a character for intelligence sufficient to command respect ; but, particularly in regard to the things which he is to teach, he must have knowledge superior to the knowledge of those who are expected to profit by his teaching. A man may be quite competent to teach the simplest principles of religion to a class of children, who is not at all competent to be the stated teacher and guide of a Christian congregation. Thirdly. The man must have such faculties of discourse and utterance as will enable him to communicate the needful truth, clearly, convincingly, and forcibly, to all the people, of whatever class or condition, with whom he has to do. He must have not only voice to reach the ear, but a power of arrangement and illus- tration, and a command of words and images, by which he may transfer his own thoughts, distinctly and vividly conceived, into the minds of those whom he attempts to teach. Now how are such qualifications to be obtained ? No man is furnished with these qualifications by birth, by inspiration, or by accident. The Apostles, indeed, were prepared and equipped for their work miraculously, as well as by the three-years' personal teaching of their Master. But in these days, the men who are to be intrusted with the Gospel as being not only "faithful," but ** able to teach others also," must be men in whom the requisite *' ability " has been formed by education, developing and cultiva- ting those natural talents which grace has sanctified. The duty, then, which was incumbent on Timothy, is, in the nature of the case, incumbent on us. It is incumbent not on min- isters only but on all Christian men, according to their means and opportunities, to take care that a competent number of men, suita- bly endowed by nature and sanctified by grace, are educated for the work of the ministry in the churches, and for the propagation of the Gospel through the world. In all that I have now said, brethren and friends, I am sure that your Christian judgment is with me. Let me ask for your kind attention to some considerations bearing on our particular duty — yours and mine — as American Christians, in this year 1869, to provide a well educated ministry both for the generation that will soon have crowded us out of our places, and for generations not yet born. I. I ask you to consider what demand there is for an increased number of such ministers — especially in connection with the growth and the distinctive work of the American Congregational churches. The question here is not whether the actual demand to- day for ministers to become pastors in vacant churches can be met to-day, — but it is whether the existing arrangements and the spirit now prevalent in our churches are such as to warrant anything like a reasonable expectation that in the year 1880, (when the boy now twelve years old will be old enough to be a preacher,) or in the year 1900, (which many of those who now hear me hope to see,) the young men who will then be wanted and called for to go and teach not this nation only but all nations, preaching the Gospel to every creature, will have been fitly educated for that work. If we would know what demand God is making upon us in this respect, we must forecast the future. The ministers wanted to-day, cannot be had to-day, if they have not been educated beforehand. The ministers who were wanted at the day of Pentecost, were forthcoming only because they had already been learning three years in Christ's own theological seminary. No safe conclusion, as to the demand for young men of the right sort to be put in 8 training for the work, can be deduced from the number of super- annuated or otherwise disabled ministers — nor from the number of those who find employment as teachers, or in connection with the religious press, or in the service of beneficent institutions — nor from the number of those whom some necessity, obvious perhaps in each particular instance, has turned aside to other occupations. Far more pertinent is it to ask what becomes of the young men educated for the ministry as they go forth in their successive classes year by year ? Are there more of them than are actually called for and employed as fast as they are ready to begin ? Ask the Executive Committee of the Home Missionary Society whether the young men whom we are educating for the ministry are numer- ous enough, and whether they would be able to employ and to sustain more missionaries if they could find them. They will tell you that, as they survey the wide field of American home mis- sions, the want which oppresses them is the want of men to preach the Gospel — men whom they may send westward beyond the Mis- sissippi, beyond the Missouri, into the great central territories which are so soon to be imperial States — men whom they may send beyond the grand sierras that divide the waters of the continent, and into the golden States of the Pacific. Their call is for men to fill the vast wilderness with the cry, "Prepare ye the way of the Lord" — men to organize Christian institutions and influences all along the line of the railway which, within the last few days, has begun to bear along its track to this emporium, from our remotest west, the teas and spices and all the richest fabrics of what was once to us the remotest east — men whose work for Christ, in such a field and at such a crisis, shall tell on all the future of the human race. Some men we have sent forth, and are sending year by year — true men, worthy to be numbered with " the heroes of faith " — men whose work is dotting the vast area with luminous points ; but oh how few are they ! And where are the many who ought to go, and whom we would send if we could find them ? Where are we to look for the men who ought to be sent into that field ten years hence, and twenty years hence ? With this question, turn your thoughts in another direction. Think of the free and reconstructed South, and of what must be done there in Christian zeal and love. Ask the directing minds of the American Missionary Association, now laboring for the eman- 9 cipated blacks, what the result is which they hope to realize, and by what sort of agency they expect that result to be obtained. They will tell you that their schools for the freedmen are not the end but the beginning, and are to be regarded as subsidiary and introductory to a higher work. The work of civilizing those chil- dren of barbarism, and of raising them to the level of a self-gov- erning freedom, will never be complete, so long as their religious guides are illiterate and untrained men. Not till they and their neighbors of the race that once oppressed them shall have been brought alike under the civilizing as well as the emancipating power of organized Christianity — -not till the Gospel shall be min- istered there, to all alike, by " faithful men who shall be able to teach others also " — -will the new social order which has been made possible by God's destroying judgments, be made actual and complete. Already the field is beginning to whiten for the harvest. Already peace has been established there under reconstructed governments; and those who were slowest of heart to believe, are beginning to understand that the new era of liberty will be an era of new prosperity. Reviving industry will bring relief, and something like oblivion of old hates and conflicts. The regions which war has devastated are already smiling in the tranquillity of better days — the cities swept by conflagration are rising from their ashes in renovated beauty — broad acres once trodden into barrenness by the feet of slaves are regaining their fertility — the homes of thrifty freemen will soon take the place of slave-huts, and will be clustered into villages around the school-house and the Christian temple — and the traveler on railways and rivers bearing the freight of a growing commerce, shall see the church spire here and there, contrasting its whiteness with the dark evergreen of the live-oak, or pointing with silent finger to the sky from amid the magnolias or the palm trees. In the new world which is there rising out of conflict and chaos, what work is there for men who shall go thither in the spirit of Christ and with his Gospel — men competently taught and trained for the ministry of that Gospel by which he who sits upon the throne is making all things new. What adequate provision are we making for the supply of that demand ? The demand is already urgent ; and soon it will be ten- fold greater than now. Take a still broader view. Our churches are doing something 10 in the field of foreign missions ; but here too, as in the home field, the great want is the want of men. The conductors of the work are confident that if the churches will only produce men of the right sort, completely trained for the work of carrying the Gospel to all nations, and of translating the Scriptures and the rudiments of a Christian literature into all languages, they will surely give the means also. Think, then, how much must be done, in the re- maining years of this nineteenth century, for the diffusion of the Gospel through the world. I am old enough to remember all the great changes since Fulton's first steamboat slowly ascended the Hudson, and you know that — " Old experience doth attain To something like prophetic strain " : — let me then, as an old man, tell you that the thirty-one years which remain before the beginning of the twentieth century, are to be grander in their record than all the years that we old men have seen. Think what changes are impending. What is it that we see to-day ? China throws every avenue wide open for the Gospel to enter ; and, placing an American citizen at the head of her embassy, she asks admission into the great commonwealth of Christian nations. The Sultan at Constantinople acknowledges before his subjects that Mohammedan civilization is a failure, tells them of their inferiority among the nations, and urges them to learn what Christendom can teach them. European ideas, follow- ing in the track of British conquest, and propagated not only by missionary zeal but by all the agencies of commerce and of gov- ernment, are revolutionizing India. The vast interior of Africa, teeming with human life, has at last been penetrated, and its mys- teries are unveiled. Great nations kindred to our own, and soon to claim their place among imperial powers, are growing up be- neath the constellations of the southern hemisphere. Commerce, with its steamers on all navigable waters, with its railways stretch- ing into every land, with the electric telegraph flashing intelligence across the continents and beneath the oceans, has annihilated former distances, and is breaking down all old barriers to intercourse and mutual influence among nations. The greatest revolution since the age of Luther is in rapid progress thfoughout Europe. Only a few months ago, a six weeks' war made Germany a Protestant 11 empire, and changed despotic Austria into a leading power in the march of political reformation ; and still more recently what do we see in Spain ! A crisis unparalleled in history is impending over the whole world, and the years that remain of this nineteenth century will be filled with it. Do I exaggerate the facts ? Do I misinterpret the signs of the time ? I speak the words of truth and soberness. If then we are living to-day on the verge of these great world- changes, have we not some responsibility in regard to them ? What ought the ministers of Christ, and the churches, to be doing at such a time as this ? Especially, what ought they to be doing now, in order that the ministry of the Gospel in the great era now opening, may be committed to a competent number of men not only faithful but able ? In view of the openings into China, and of the changes which are already unfolding there, our Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions have distinctly called on the churches of their constituency for a thousand missionaries, to be sent into that empire within the next ten years. Where are the men to answer that demand ? I will not ask where are the thou- sand, nor where are half of them. If only a hundred mission- aries are to be sent into that empire of four hundred millions of souls within the next five years, where are they ? Those who are going in 1873 or earlier, ought to be now far advanced in their education for the ministry. Where are they ? What are we doing to bring them forward ? Surely, if the churches are to do their part in preparing and shaping the new world of the twentieth, century, there must be a great waking up to the duty of finding, out where the young men are whom God is calling to the ministry,, and of bringing them forward through such a course of training as will qualify them for their work in these swiftly coming years. of change, of conflict, of opportunity^ and of decision. II. Let not your patience fail, if I now ask you to consider, for a few moments, what reasons there are in our country, and in thi& age, for endeavors to establish and keep up a system of thorough preparation for the ministry. And if I speak especially of intel-^ lectual preparation, let me not be understood as implying that any possible intellectual preparation — any riches of knowledge and learning—any drill and discipline in logic-— any accomplishments 12 in the arts of discourse and utterance — anything that the world recognizes as scholarship or culture — can qualify a man of what- ever genius for the ministry of the Gospel^ without that higher and nobler culture which begins in the fear of God, which believes in Christ and learns of him, which consecrates the soul with all its powers and attainments to the service of Christ, and by which the man, renewed within and ever becoming more like Christ, is made ready alike for labor and for sacrifice. Far from us be the thought of a merely intellectual preparation for the ministry. Far better is the most ignorant preacher that can spell out a text from the Bible, if he has had a spiritual training like that of John Bunyan the tinker, than the most learned theologian who undertakes to preach the Gospel without any experience of its renewing power. God grant that we may have *' faithful " ministers even of inferior *' ability," rather than "able" ministers who are not truly and spiritually "faithful," But without forgetting this, let us remem- ber what need there is of a well trained ministry for these times. Let me ask then, is there not danger that the importance of thorough preparation for the ministry will be overlooked in our churches ? We are not tied up by authoritative rules, forbidding us to ordain a minister, or to recognize and employ a preacher, whatever evidence there may be of his having been divinely called, unless he has pursued a certain prescribed course of study. There is always among us a ready recognition, and admission to our pulpits, of any man whom God has evidently called to the min- istry and qualified for it — without inquiring whether the candidate has « spent four years in college studies and three years in a theo- logical seminary. Yet we have a system of preparation for the ministry — one which our fathers instituted at the beginning of our history, and which has been enlarged and modified to keep pace with the progress of the ages ; and under that system the ministry of our churches is not inferior, as a whole, to any equal body of ministers, here or elsewhere, either in general culture or in the knowledge specially pertaining to their work. Heretofore, while we have maintained the system, and have been improving it, ex- ceptional cases have been recognized and dealt with as exceptions. But is there not, of late, a tendency to undervalue the system — to let down the standard — to insist on having some shorter course of preparation which shall give us a more abundant supply of cheap 13 ministers supposed to be good enough for pioneer work and for inferior parishes ? Therefore it is that I ask you to consider for a moment, what reasons there are, in our country, and in our times, for keeping up and enlarging our system of thorough preparation for the highest and holiest work ever committed to human hands. The times through which we are passing in this country — and through which all Christendom is passing — are distinguished by a great intellectual conflict. Evangelical Christianity is called to contend with powerful enemies for its legitimate dominion over human souls. It must maintain itself against the superstitious tra- ditions of Romanism on the one hand, and the atheistic tendencies of modern philosophy on the other hand. At such a time as this — in a country and in an age of the sharpest intellectual conflict — are not the churches and their pastors and other ministers sum- moned to make every possible provision and arrangement for the education of a ministry thoroughly equipped for a spiritual war whether with the specious learning and ensnaring sophistries of Romanism or with the fatalistic, demoralizing, godless tendencies of Naturalism. Within the next thirty years, all the traditions which have come down to us from the Reformers in the sixteenth century — the forms and definitions of the doctrines which the Scriptures teach — nay, the authority of the Scriptures themselves, and the manner in which we are to receive and use those holy doc- uments of the Christian faith, must be reconsidered and our con- ceptions must be clarified and readjusted ; or the truth which the Gospel reveals to sinful souls will be obscured, and men will perish for want of it. Nor is this conflict going on merely in universities, and at such like centres of thought and learned discussion. The conflict is popularized — it is everywhere. We are carrying on our grand home missionary work in the very presence of this conflict. Think, then, how grand a work that is. We are organizing Christian institutions in broad regions that were yesterday a wil- derness — on the Pacific coast — along the railways that are laying their track across the continent — ^in the valleys and gorges of the Rocky Mountains, and everywhere the same conflict meets us. Go where we will to preach the Gospel, the Jesuit is there with his beguiling sophisms, and the unbelieving Naturalist is there with his denial — outspoken, perhaps — perhaps only suggested — of a 14 personal and holy God. Wherever our periodical literature goes — and it goes everywhere — wherever our daily or weekly news- papers go — the minister of the Gospel finds himself under a necessity of maintaining, by intelligent and manly argument, the facts of the Gospel against speculative unbelief, and the simplic" ity and freedom of the Gospel against superstition and spiritual despotism. At the same time we are pursuing, and must continue to pursue, a proportionate work of foreign missions. If we would save our own country — if the American churches are to be vigor- ous and thriving in their home activities — these enterprises for the propagation of Christian influences and Christian institutions through the world, must be not only sustained but enlarged. What sort of men, then, must we send forth into all the lands outside of Christendom, in the prosecution of that work ? Ask, rather, what sort of men we have already sent. What have they done ? Largely their work has been a work of scholarship, though of scholarship subordinate and incidental to their higher aim. Think of their contributions to the science of comparative philology, not in rude vocabularies, but in philosophical grammars and lexicons, otten of languages never before reduced to any written form. Think of their translations of the Scriptures from the original Hebrew and Greek, into languages which, by strenuous effort, they had made familiarly their own. Think of the many other books, translated or original, which they have given to those lan- guages — of the schools they have founded — of the pupils they have trained. Think of what they have done, and are now doing in China. Think of such a work as that of the venerable Goodell and his surviving associate, Kiggs, — doing for the Armenian, language, and the Armeno-Turkish, what Luther did three hun- dred years ago for the German, and Tyndale for our own English tongue. Think of the work commenced and continued through many laborious years, by Eli Smith, and recently completed by his successor Van Dyck — the translation of the Bible into the sacred language of Mohammedanism, spoken to-day as a living language by sixty millions of people — a translation so exquisite in the classi-- cal purity and finish of its style, that it charms the fastidiousness of Arab criticism, and challenges comparison with the Koran itself. All the scholarship of the nineteenth century can boast of no greater 15 achievement than this, which I refer to not simply as showing what oar foreign missionaries have done, but rather as showing what sort of men are needed for this work of preaching the Gospel to every creature. The work is going forward with wonderful development of opportunities and of resources ; and, as it pro- ceeds, the men sent forth from our country must be, even more than heretofore, men of trained and cultivated power ; they must be qualified for leadership in great movements ; they must be directors, organizers, founders of institutions, teachers in the higher departments of instruction, translators and authors of Christian books, and must employ, more and more, the agency of native evangelists and pastors. It is easy to see that, in the coming years, the demand in behalf of the now unevangelized world will be not for uneducated men, or men half-educated, but rather for men whose native powers, sanctified by grace, have been trained by thorough education. The question, then, comes home to us — let me say, brethren and friends of this congregation, the question comes home to you, — Are we not called, at this time, to make new and larger arrange- ments for the education of a ministry that shall be " able " as well as " faithful." Some may be framing in their minds the answer, " What need is there of calling on us for aid ? — what need is there of special arrangements and endowments for bringing forward a supply of educated ministers? — why will not the demand create the supply ? " I will tell you why. The work of preaching the Gospel, whether as a missionary or as a pastor, is not a remunerative employment. We cannot safely apply the maxims of the market, or of political economy, to a problem like this. No young man devotes himself to the ministry in the expectation that the money which his education will cost, and the time and labor which he must expend in it, will be profi- tably invested — profitably to himself in the commercial meaning of the word. Not only would he be disappointed if he should act on such an expectation, but who would want him for a minister if the expectation of making money by the ministry were among his motives ? No ; the problem of providing a faithful and able ministry of the Gospel for our country and for the world, is a problem on which the commercial doctrine of a fixed relation 16 between demand and supply in the market, can shed no light ; for the demand in this case addresses itself to motives and sentiments altogether different from those on which the whole science of wealth and trade, with all its certainties, is built. The call which addresses itself to young men, is not, " Behold these opening ave- nues to wealth, to ease, to the world's honors." It is the voice of God, sounding in his sanctuary, *' AVhom shall I send, and who will go for us ?" It is the voice of Christ, saying, as he said of old, to the sons of Andrew, and to the sons of Zebedee, and to Matthew " at the receipt of custom," " Follow me — forsake all and follow me — go ye into all the world and preach the Gospel to every creature, and lo ! I am with you always." It is the voice of faith, " Trust in the Lord and do good, and verily thou shalt be fed." The demand on the churches is, " Find out the young men whom the Lord hath need of — whom the Holy Ghost is quicken- ing and calling — make it possible for them to do the great work to which God calls them — encourage their diffidence — take them by the hand, and put them forward after a godly sort." The truth is that the ministry of the Gospel always has been, and in the nature of the case, always must be recruited largely from the families of what are called the humbler classes in society. Provision must be made for their support in part, through the whole course of their preparation for a work which will never repay them, save in spiritual blessings, for the cost and toil of preparation. The question, then, is, first of all, Will the living Christianity of our country do this ? Will those men in our churches, to whom God has given large means and large hearts, lay the necessary foundations for educating thoroughly the pastors and the missionaries demanded by the exigencies of our age, and by the prospective need of Christ's great work ? Will they pro- vide that the young men whom God calls, and who answer to his call, shall have not only theological instruction, but shelter and home, and daily food if they cannot procure it for themselves, while making preparation for a work so unattractive save to heroic souls kindling with love to Christ, and with the spirit of self- sacrifice ? Next, the question is, Will the churches, guided by their pas- tors, find out the young men whom God is calling, and put them on the way to the ministry ? Many a young man there is who 17 might be greatly useful in the work of the Gospel, at home or abroad, but who knows not that the Lord hath need of him. His modesty, perhaps, and too diffident estimate of what is in him — perhaps his lack of opportunity — perhaps his poverty and the lowliness of his condition — have kept him from knowing his own capabilities. But ought not his pastor to know him ? Ought not some brother in the church to know him ? Might not that pastor or that Christian brother be the organ of a Divine call to him ? Ought not the church to take him by the hand and say, ''Leave the farm — the workshop — the counting-house — leave whatever may seem to be your secular calling, and begin to prepare yourself for the ministry of Christ." Ought not the churc h to tell him, '^ We will help you to bear your burthen ; we will help you if you need help, at school and at college ; if you are willing to struggle for yourself, we will see that you are neither hungry nor cold, nor yet ragged." The question is, Will the churches, guided by their pastors, do this — or anything like it ? Are they doing it ? There is another form of the question. Will Christian parents in our churches consecrate their sons to Christ, in the prayer and hope that God will make them ministers of his word ? The sec- ular activities of our country are such — there are so many paths leading to wealth, to social position, and to enviable distinction of one kind and another — that many a parent — yes, many a parent of whom better things might be expected — shrinks from the thought of giving up his son to the humble and seemingly ill-requited work of ministering in the Gospel of Christ. It is not the rich only whose minds are infected with such a feeling. Even a poor man may say to himself, '' This bright boy of mine, if I can help him to a good education, may be distinguished at the bar ; his income may be not thousands of dollars but tens of thousands ; the highest judicial or political offices may be within his reach. If I put him in the way of becoming a merchant or business man, I may live to see him a great capitalist, one of the merchant princes, doing good on the widest scale by his munificence. But if he becomes a minister of the Gospel, the chances are a thousand to one that there will be for him only a ' shady-side ' experience. I must dissuade him from such a course. Let my son be a rich man, and let somebody else's son endure hardness in the ministry 18 of the Gospel." Am I wrong in suggesting that this is the way in which too many parents, professedly Christian, think and feel about their children ? Surely there are few ministers of Christ in this assembly, whose tenderest memories do not prompt them to respond, " It was not so with my father," — or, at least, " It was not so with my mother." Surely, there are few who will not testify, ^* There were prayers over my cradle — lessons of duty and of aspiration were breathed into my mind in early childhood — by which I was consecrated to this ministry." Now the question 'is. Will Christian parents in our churches, to-day and henceforward, do as those parents did ? Have you who are the father of a hopeful son, consecrated that son to Christ for the ministry of his Gospel ? Has it been your prayer — dare you pray that God will take him and use him in a work which offers so little of wealth or of worldly honor ? Does he know that you are praying and hoping to see him ^' stand up for Jesus " in the pulpit ? Have you ever told him that, if it is in his heart to obtain such an -^^ducation as will qualify him with the needful ability for the ministry, you are ready to relinquish your worldly aspirations, and to help him forward by every sacrifice in your power ? You who are a mother, is it your daily prayer for your darling boy, that God may call him to be a minister of the Gospel ? Fathers and mothers ! the great majority of those who are now serving the churches, whether as pastors or as evangelists, at home or abroad, are in that work because their parents gave them to it in faith and pr-^yer, and let me say in their name, *' If the spirit which consecrated us to this ministry when we were children, is dying out, then the work which these churches are required to do for our country and for the world, will not be done." The question presents itself in yet another form. Can the young men be found who will give themselves to the work ? In this form the question comes to all young men of competent gifts, whose hearts God has quickened by his grace, and who are asking, in reference to the future of their lives, '* Lord, what wilt thou have me to do ?" But especially does it come to young men who are already privileged with opportunities and means of culture, and are looking forward to a life of intellectual activity. Perhaps I speak in the hearing of some such. Let me say to them. You \ 19 must not dismiss this subject from your thoughts without consider- ing the distinct and loud appeal which it makes to you. If we call on the churches to give their best young men to the high but self-denying employment of preaching the Gospel in all lands, and to provide the endowments and foundations on which young men may be fitly trained for that employment, how much more may we, in God's name, call on you to give yourselves ? Where shall we find the young men upon whom Paul, if he were here, would lay his consecrating hand, as he laid it upon Timothy ? Where shall we, who have borne the heat and burthen of our day, find men to take our places in the grand succession from Christ's Apostles ? Some young men, with gifts that might be useful in this minis- try, are looking for the avenues to wealth — some for the avenues to secular distinction or to fame. I say to them, and to all. Friends, there is for you, if you will hear God's call, an avenue to some- thing better — better than wealth — better than all the honors which this world can offer. Would you not rather be Paul than Felix, or Festus, or Nero ? Would you not rather be Timothy than the most fortunate and successful of the Epicureans or Stoics to whom Paul seemed only a babbler ? Would you not rather be the humble and faithful village pastor, than the successful village lawyer ? Would you not rather be found among them who have turned many to righteousness, and who shall shine as the bright- ness of the firmament forever, than among them whom the world calls happy ? Here, then, is the conclusion which I would leave distinctly impressed on every mind. There is a view in which those words of " Paul the aged " to his " son Timothy " are his words — and God's — to us ministers of the Gospel and hearers of the Gospel at this time. From the cell in which the Apostle was waiting for the executioner, his voice comes sounding through the centuries to us — nay rather from the throne of Him to whom all power is given in heaven and in earth, a more commanding voice comes down to us, '* The things which ye have heard of me — the same commit ye to faithful men who shall be able to teach others also." LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 119 022 168 741 3