do OSWEGO : An Historical Address f- GEORGE Tv^LARK OnC2, Jefferson, then Secretary of State, formally opened the subject of the violation of the seventh article of the treaty by the retention of the posts, with Hammond, the English envoy to this country. The explanation came quickly that the King-, his master, had suspended that article because of the failure of Congress to prevent the hindrance of British creditors in collect- ing their debts, and because estates confiscated from the Tories had not been restored. The charge was true. Massachusetts, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia and South Carolina had every one enacted statutes blocking the machinery of the law against English creditors. To the other charge of failure to restore the confiscated Tory estates, Jefferson replied that the only engagement had been to recommend a restoration of the estates, not to restore them. The claim was made at the time that English handlers of the profitable fur trade influenced the British ministry to delay a settlement whilst they were enjoying what was naturally the business of Americans. It was also charged that the well known feebleness of the infant nation to enforce reprisals contented England with the situation in which things were. Still another cause assigned was the purpose of the British to compel the alliance of the Indians through the threat implied in the possession of the frontier posts. These and other poignant hostilities established a high tension between the countries. On April 21, 1794, the Republicans in Congress moved to suspend all commercial intercourse with Great Britain until the frontier posts were given up. The people, loaded with 22 debt, and otherwise never so poorly prepared for war, still clamored for its declaration. But now he who so often before had stilled the tempest, disclosed his calm and majestic personality for the salvation of his country. Oblivious of the storm of popular disapproval, Washing- ton wrote to the Senate: " But as peace ought to be preserved with unremitted zeal before the last recourse, which has so often been the scourge of nations, and can- not fail to check the advancing prosperity of the United States, is contemplated, I have thought proper to nomi- nate and I do hereby nominate John Jay as envoy ex- traordinary of the United States to His Britannic Maj- esty." The faithful servant who a decade before had obtained peace with so much honor for his country, was again enlisted to preserve it. Well did he know the unpopu- larity of his mission. He writes: " If Washington sees fit to call me to this service I will go and perform it, fore- seeing as I do the consequence to my personal popularity. The good of my country I believe demands the sacrifice, and I am ready to make it." He sailed on the 12th of May, 1794. While he was upon the sea, affairs at home were rapidly approaching war. Three companies of a British regiment invaded what is now Northern Ohio to establish Fort Miami there, and in a message to Congress Washington suggests the propriety of preparing for the dread event. But the celebrated treaty known by the name of its negotiator, signed in London on the 19th of November, 1794, averted a catastrophe. By its terms the United States under- took to compensate British creditors. British troops were to withdraw from all territories of the United 23 States on June 1, 1796. Compensation for retention of the posts was omitted on the ground that the United States had suffered several states to prevent the re- covery of debts owed to British creditors. The storm of popular disapproval which greeted this treaty was not less than Jay had anticipated. In Phila- delphia he was hung in effigy, and in New York Hamil- ton was stoned when he arose to speak in his defense. " Calumny," said the unruffled Jay, " is seldom durable; it will in time yield to truth." On June 24, 1795, the treaty was ratified by the Senate, and on August 15th Washington signed it. The delay in the withdrawal of the British forces from Fort Ontario after June 1st until the day, one hun- dred years ago, whose anniversary we celebrate, was not the fault of Great Britain. Washington in his last mes- sage to Congress assigned the reason for it. He writes that the period at which the appropriation was passed to carry into effect the treaty "necessarily procrastinated the reception of the posts stipulated to be delivered, beyond the date assigned for that exenV 1 The diplo- matic correspondence on the subject in the foreign office in London between the Duke of Portland, Great Brit- ain's Secretary of State, and Lord Dorchester, Governor- General of Canada, discloses the readiness on their part to comply with the terms of the treaty. They arranged to retain a guard for the security of the posts until the United States should be ready to occupy them. And so it transpired that in July, 1796, a hundred years ago, Fort Ontario, a cherished fortification, passed from the possession of a great power across the sea, and entered into the birthright of its own people. There 24 is slight record of the circumstances of the transfer. Like many significant events in history, it transpired in quietness and simplicity. No great display of arms, no strains of martial music, no concourse of people, no pres- ence of distinguished men and women, then honored that great day as now it is honored. One eye witness of the event says that the British garrison marched out and gave possession to the Amer- ican troops, who marched in with their field-pieces, planted the standard of the United States on the ram- parts of the tort, and fired a salute of fifteen cannon. He further declares that the British officers behaved with great politeness. Another witness, Mr. F. Elmer, an American officer, writing to Mr. George Scriba, says that the American flag under a federal salute was for the first time dis- played from the citadel of the fort at the hour of ten in the morning. Captain Clark and Colonel Fothergill were His Majesty's officers, left with a detachment of thirty men for the protection of the works. " From these gentlemen," he says, " the greatest politeness and civility was displayed to us in adjusting the transfer, the buildings and gardens being left in the neatest order." These are the simple annals of the evacuation of Fort Ontario by the British. Thus ended England's sover- eignty over territory of the United States. Time forbids and the occasion does not require the later history of this time-honored fort. It must suffice to say that for some time prior to the war of 1812 Fort Ontario was unoccupied. During that war, on May 5, 1814, a British fleet of eight vessels from Kingston, carrying two hundred and twenty guns and three thou- 25 sand men, under Sir James Yeo, appeared before Oswego and bombarded it, It was defended by Colonel Mitchell, who had been dispatched from Sackett's Harbor with three hundred men. Under protection of the ships' guns, the British troops were landed, and on May 6, after a vigorous resistance, the command in Fort Ontario sur- rendered. The British threw down the fortifications and abandoned the place. Thus it lay until in 1839 Con- gress voted a sum for its restoration. The timber work and the houses you see about you are of that date. Since then it has been continuously garrisoned until two years ago, when the authorities at Washington saw fit to abandon this historic and strategic fort. And now we would depart the scene and this occa- sion with sentiments of welcome and friendship fir our kinsmen of Great Britain across the lake and across the sea. We celebrate here to-day no victories. The occasion does not invite nor does our disposition so incline us. We celebrate rather the final coming into his estate of the rightful heir. The just Washington, in his last mes- sage to Congress, December 7, 1796, writes that as soon as the Governor-General of Canada could be ad- dressed with propriety on the subject, arrangements were cordially and promptly concluded by Great Britain for the evacuation of the posts. Eye witnesses of the event we celebrate declare that it was conducted by the British with the greatest politeness and civility. This cordiality, this courtesy, may we be permitted on this occasion to acknowledge and to reciprocate. If courtesy be the flower of peace, then with the flowers of peace we, too, would decorate this day as they did decorate 26 the day a hundred years ago. Peace has been in our time. In our time may it not be marred. It has been said that the destiny of the race is in the custody of the English-speaking people. Together, then, let them bear onward toward " the universal pacification of mankind." km* • ~ . LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 014 224 297 7 * ft L«