Class ! A 504- Book inc 1645, inc -> c - ■ 165 1, rate. Dudley x 73 2 1 739, rate 1739. d. s. Duxbury 1632 x 734> ra te 1740, rn. s. Fitchburg 1764 1764, rate 1764, d. s. Haverhill 1645 1661, r., t I 673, t. 1685, r -> t. 1712, rate 1712, d. s. Lunenburg 1728 1732, rate 1 733, m. s. Maiden 1649 I 7° I , rate 1702, r., t 1701, m. s. 1710, t. 1710, rate., 171°, m. s. Newbury 1635 I 639, t., c 1652, rate 1687, d. s. 1676, r.. t. i69i,r.,t. Eng. free 1691, m. s. 1697, rate I 7°2, m. s, Northampton . . 1654 1663, r., t 1676, t., s. 1693, rate. Palmer 1716 1 7$2, rate 1752, m. s. Pelham 1738 1746, rate 1746, m. s. Plvmouth 1620 z 693, rate 1699, t., s 1696, m. s. 1704, rate. 1705, r., t., c. 1716, rate 1716, d. s. 118 Ibid., 140, 141. 74 Records of Town Action with Respect to School Support Settled or First Rec. of Changes in Method Moving or Town. Incorporated. Support. of Support. Divided School. Salem 1626 1644, c, r 1670, r., t. 1677, inc., t. 1734, inc., r., t 1734, d. s. Springfield 1636 ^77, t., inc. . . .1678, t., s. • 1706, r., t. i7i3,rate 1713,(3. s. Tisbury 1669 1 73 7, rate 1737, m. s. Watertown .... 1630 1650, t., s 1667, rate. 1681, r., t. 1686, t., s. 1690, r., c. 1693, r -» t. i7oi,rate 1701, m. s. r — rate. t — tuition. inc — income. c — contributions. s — supply. CHAPTER V School Support by General Taxation Before taking up the Law of 1647, so wen * known in American Educational History, and which marks the next step in school legislation by the General Court, it may be well to bring together some of the more important conclusions which were arrived at in the previous chapters. We have found that the support of the poor in England passed through three stages : First the period of voluntary contribution, then of compulsory contribution, and lastly, the assessment of a general tax ; that the last stage of this evolution in method was reached before the colonists came to America and hence would form a general background of experience which without doubt influenced them when meeting like problems in new conditions. We found evidence in the general sociological conditions, in the records, and in the Act of 1638 to justify the conclusion that the first and last stages were present in the development of the support of the town's poor in Massachusetts but, as might be expected, from familiarity with English methods the support of the poor became an item on the civil list some time before the like appearance of min- isterial or school support. We have shown the close connection between religion and edu- cation and presented evidence to show that the support of the church also passed through the contribution stages to practically unanimous support by taxation in 1660 and, because of this close connection, the inference is that the support of the church would influence the method of school support to a great degree. Finally, the records show that, with respect to school support, the contribution stages were present in Boston, Charlestown, Dedham, Salem, and there is the highest probability that they were present elsewhere. It now remains to show the causes which lead up to the last stage — support by general taxation. The Act passed by the Court in 1647 ordered "that every township in this jurisdiction after the Lord hath increased them to the number of fifty house holders, shall then forthwith appoint one within their town to teach all such children as shall resort to him to write and read, whose wages shall be paid either by the parents or masters 76 School Support by General Taxation of such children, or by the inhabitants in general by way of supply, as the major part of those who order the prudentials of the town shall appoint; providing, those that send their children be not oppressed by paying much more than they can have them taught for in other towns; and it is forthwith ordered that where any town shall increase to the number of 100 families or householders, they shall set up a grammar school, the master thereof being able to instruct youth so far as they may be fitted for the university, provided that if any town neglect that per- formance hereof above one year, that every such town shall pay 5 pounds to the next school till they shall perform this order." 1 In 1 67 1 the fine was increased to 10, in 1683 to 20, and in 1 71 2 to 30 pounds on every town of one hundred and fifty and 40 pounds on towns of two hundred families. This law shows advance beyond the law of '42 in that it made schools compulsory and made the school a civil instead - of a church institution. So far as support is concerned it con- tains nothing new but makes an application of the law of 1634 which made estates and abilities subject to rate for all public charges, and of the law of 1638 which made the inhabitants liable for all charges from which they might or did receive benefit. By authority of the first act a definite school rate, or money by way of supply might be levied on the inhabitants ; under the second act tuition charges might be made upon all children of school age or on such children as attended school. These methods being authorized, various combinations of the above provisions were made as we found in the records and the summary following the preceding chapter. The general tendency among the towns following the Act of '47 was to use a combination of the principles enunciated in the Acts of '34 and '38 rather than to support the school entirely by rate or entirely by tuition. We find, however, that Boston began the support of its school, with the exception of entry money, by rate in 1650; Dorchester supported its school by rate in 1651, Newbury in 1652, and Watertown in 1667 — thus follow- ing in principle the Act of '34. With the exception of Dor- chester and Boston this method did not continue for a great length of time and was supplanted by some combination of tuition and rate. The method of support by rate being once used, the probable explanation of change lies in the objections of wealthy tax-payers ; of those who, having no children in school, had little 1 Mass. Col. Rec, II., 203. School Support by General Taxation 77 or no interest in its support; and to the growing and general lack of interest in education. There are several reasons why such a condition of affairs should have existed. As has been pointed out, the connection between education and religion in the early years was very close but it was not long before there was a decline in religious motives, due in great part to the large number of non-church members in the colony and the appearance of a new generation which was not actuated by the same motives and ideals as were the first settlers. Hence it was no longer the great concern of the inhabitants that youth should be raised up to the ministry,; they became more and more engrossed with their own personal affairs and education did not seem at all necessary to , further the clearing of the land or the planting of corn. In 1675 the Indian wars began and a little later the expedi- tions against the French in Canada increased the burden of taxa- tion enormously; this-is shown clearly in the charts of expendi- tures for Dedham, Dorchester, and Watertown. Lack of interest and lack of money must have tended to reduce salaries, or de- crease the length of school term, or both, and parents kept their children at home in many instances, without doubt, rather than pay the tuition charges. When the reaction set in and the Courts became more stringent and alert in presenting and fining towns, while at the same time the fines were increased, the above-men- tioned conditions were of great importance in the forming of a new method of support. Another factor to be considered is the settling of the more remote sections of the town, considering the church and the school as the center. Though the Court passed a law forbidding the erection of a dwelling house at a greater distance than one- half mile from the meeting-house, 2 in the course of time this restriction was necessarily disregarded as population increased. The farther removed the home from the center of the town, the more difficult it was for the children to attend school for the maintenance of which the father was taxed. Naturally he wished his children to derive some benefit from his share of the money paid for the support of the school and as the number of such parents swelled, their negative influence was strongly 'Mass. Col. Rec, I., 157, 181. 78 School Support by General Taxation felt when the question of voting a town rate for the school was presented. Those who sent children from a distance ob- jected to paying as large tuition fees as those who lived near by the school ; probably some did not send their children at all, and on all sides it became more difficult to raise the master's salary. Briefly, then, towards the close of the 17th century we have a general lack of interest in education, more or less financial depression, settlements being made farther and farther from the center of the town, a loss of the communal spirit, laws making schools obligatory, and a well defined tendency on the part of those in authority to present and fine such towns as were delin- quent in maintaining a school. Let us trace the history of school support in a few of the towns during the latter part of the 17th and the first of the 18th century. The town of Haverhill in 1673 began the policy of cutting down the town's contribution by rate to the support of the school. This policy evidently continued for a long time and from the fact that the town was presented during this time and that records of school matters are very few, we may judge that a method of support which did not include a general levy on the town, was not conducive to the maintenance of a permanent school. In 171 1 the selectmen were directed to hire a master who should keep school during the year in different parts of the town. But when the selectmen found themselves unable to hire a teacher under such conditions and suggested that a master be hired to teach in the center of the town the townsmen refused to vote a tax for the support of such a school. It seems reason- able to suppose, since the tax was voted when all the inhabitants were to have the benefit of the school, that the second proposi- tion was voted down by those who would not receive benefit of the school when kept in the center of the town — aided by those who had no children to send. In the following year the school was divided and the rate granted. The first school in Maiden was not a town but a private school which received now and then a small sum from the town as an " incouragement " and incidentally enabled the town to avoid being presented and fined. Evidently the school could not be kept up by tuition and small encouragements from the town for in 1701 there is a record to the effect that the town was presented. The School Support by General Taxation 79 town immediately voted a general levy to maintain a school in the four quarters of the town in succession, which gave all an equal opportunity to benefit thereby. In the following year there was a fixed school supported not by general taxation alone but by tuition and supply, thus throwing the burden of support on those who sent children to school, i. e., those living in the center of the town. This method was used until 171 1 when the town decided to hire a master and dispense with the " sup- ply." The town was presented within a month. Everything points to the fact that there was not a great degree of interest in the school but the law demanded that one be maintained. The evident price of its maintenance was the ability of all to partici- pate in its benefits, for we find, as in 1702, that the general levy is granted in return for the moving school. Plymouth in 1693 pledged the inhabitants to the support of a school ; three years later the town voted for a moving school, thus indicating pressure on the part of those living at a dis- tance for a share in the school if the rate for school support was to be voted. In '99 it was voted that a fixed school be maintained by tuition and supply. This method prevailed until 1716 when three schools were set up and supported once more l)y the general levy. Watertown in 1676 was supporting its school by general taxa- tion but at this time the town instructed the selectmen to hire as cheaply as possible. During the next four years, either because a school was not regularly maintained or because Latin was not taught, the town seems to have incurred the displeasure of the Court. In '86 the town levy was cut to twenty pounds and tuition was charged. In '90 the town offered to pay 15 pounds if some of the public spirited inhabitants would make up the balance sufficient to hire a teacher and thus satisfy the law. This scheme evidently did not work well for in '92 the town was again presented for want of a school. The following year the town voted to give the master 5 pounds and tuition, though it is evident from the record that it was not expected that many children would attend. Sometime between '93 and '96 the town was in trouble again with the Court. The town, having refused the offer of a master to teach for 20 pounds, sent a committee to the Court to inform that body that the town was expecting to secure a master soon. A master was hired for 10 pounds a 80 School Support by General Taxation year and tuition. All this shows the lack of vital interest in education that has been previously mentioned and the failure of the methods of support indicated above to maintain a permanent school. In 1701 the town voted to support the school by general taxation and hold it in two places during the year. After this action there was no further trouble with the Court. We see now from the records of these four towns, which are typical, what the effect of the lack of interest in education was — reduction of the town's contribution to the master's salary; a well defined tendency to place the burden of support on those who sent children to school ; the consequent falling off in attend- ance; periods when no school was kept; and warning and fines by the Court. In short, the method of tuition and supply had become inadequate to maintain a school. On the other hand we have the absolute necessity of maintaining a school or being mulcted by the Court, and also a considerable number of inhabitants whose children could receive no benefit from a fixed school and who would therefore be decidedly in favor of allowing those who received the benefit of the school to support it or help to sup- port it by payment of tuition. It was out of these conditions that the moving, and the divided school took its rise. The price which was paid for the voting of a general tax by which the school might be supported, beyond question, was, as we have seen, an opportunity for all the children of the town to attend school. Hence it must move, be divided, or money must be given to remote sections that they might take care of themselves so far as securing a teacher for a short time during the year was con- cerned. It will have been noticed in the account of the four towns given in this chapter that in every instance support by general taxation is accompanied by a resolution which does away with the fixed school. Nothing can bring out more clearly the connection between support by general taxation and the direct participation of the outer sections in the town school than the following chart. It will be noticed at the outset, 1691, that there is not the close relationship between such support and the rise of the curve indicating a general participation in school benefits as is shown some years later. Take, for example, the year 1696. The towns supporting their schools at this time by general taxation were Dorchester, Cambridge, Dedham, Newbury, Northampton, and School Support by General Taxation 81 Plymouth. Dorchester, as we know, supported its school by rate from 165 1 — due no doubt to the influence of the law of '34 which gave power to tax estates for public charges. The town school of Cambridge did not begin until 1692. Because there was no hampering effect of custom, and because of the general attitude of the Court and the size of the fine which might be levied if a school were not maintained, the inhabitants were prob- ably influenced to support the school by rate. The failure to main- tain a private school by tuition and sundry encouragements from the town was probably the cause of the town school. No satisfac- tory explanation of the change of method in Dedham offers itself. We know that concessions to the more remote inhabitants were made in 1685 which continued in force until '91. From '91 to '94 these concessions were withdrawn and during the latter year support by taxation was voted. Whether this was a benefit to those who had formerly gained by the concessions of '85 or not seems impossible to determine; the moving school did not come until 1717. In Newbury the principle in question was active in 1687-8 and 1691-4. But after '97 all mention of tuition ceases though the moving school did not appear until 1702. Northampton presents another problem for which there is no definite solution at hand. It was a frontier town and therefore the settlers were not scattered to any extent ; doubtless there was not much wealth and the major part of the inhabitants thought that support by general tax would bear less heavily on the com- munity hence such a method was enacted though, as the records show, there was considerable opposition. But, in the large, the general parallelism of the two curves point directly to the one conclusion — the last stage in the evolution of school support, i. e., general taxation and the abolition of tuition charges, was due to the necessity of maintaining a school and the desire to have a fair return in schooling for money spent in its support. This brings us to the last stage in the development of school support and also lays the foundation for our present system of free schools, that is, publicly controlled and publicly supported. The conditions which brought about the moving school estab- lished the free school and in the early history of the free school as a permanent institution, in the great majority of cases, it and the moving school were one. 82 School Support by General Taxation 20 15 16 14 12 10 whole number of towns, .schools supported b\j taxation. __._—- moving and divided schools. 6*1 In the above chart the abscissas give the years and the ordinates the number of towns; The close connection between the voting of school support by general taxation is clearly of the period indicated by the chart. This is explained on the ground that such towns School Support by General Taxation 83 ,S~ "fU — *tl — m — 15 — 13 — f2T '4o — $1 >ti "tfi — W^ the data which forms the basis for the representation is found in Chapter IV. shown, though there were towns which supported a fixed school by taxation at the close were founded after the idea of school support by taxation had become general. CHAPTER VI The " Free School " The term " free school " was in common use in England for many years previous to the emigration of the Puritans, and, according to Leach in his work on the " English School at the Reformation," this term, various interpretations to the contrary notwithstanding, always meant freedom from tuition charges. The early colonial interpretation of the term indicates a similar meaning though some of the colonial " free schools " were not free in our understanding of what is meant by a free school, that is, a school supported and controlled by the public as a whole. A school which was free from tuition charges under any form of support through contribution could not be on a perma- nent basis and could not fill the conditions as stated in our definition of the term. The origin of the modern free school comes with the final step in the development of school support through the voluntary and the compulsory contribution, the com- bination of tuition and general taxation, and the conditions which caused the moving, or the divided school, that is, the origin and continued existence of the free school depended upon the oppor- tunity for all to share in its benefits. In his discussion of the " free school " Leach says that " it has been alleged that Free School did not mean free or gratuitous but (i) a Grammar School, (2) free from ecclesiastical juris- diction, (3) giving a liberal education, (4) immediately dependent on the Crown, (5) free from the statute of mortmain. There may be other fanciful meanings devised to escape the obvious meaning. None of them can survive when confronted with the facts." He then shows at length that the term free school is applied not only to Grammar but to Song, and Writing Schools as well ; that it could not have meant freedom from ecclesiastical jurisdiction for in every case the license of the ordinary was a necessity until within the last century ; that it could not have meant that the Crown was the only authority for the statutes had to be approved by the Bishop and the master was almost invariably appointed by some person other than the Crown ; that it did not mean a liberal education for in the schools founded The Free School 85 in Yorkshire the word for liberal education is used and it is not libera but liberalise that it did not mean free from the statute of mortmain for when such license was embodied it was a license to a limited amount only and the school was not freed from the statute generally. He concludes the discussion by saying, "it is impossible that it could have meant anything but what it was popularly supposed to mean — free from the payment of tuition fees. Entrance fees, and all sorts of luxuries such as fires, lights, candles, stationary, whippings might have been paid for but free school meant undoubtedly a school in which because of the endowment, all, or some of the scholars, the poor or the inhabitants of the place, or a certain number, were freed from fees for teaching." 3 Such are the conclusions of one who has made the most com- plete study of this question, and this must, of course, be taken into consideration when the term is used in the various Massa- chusetts towns. Yet this obvious meaning either entirely escaped or was only partly sensed by those writers on early education in Massachusetts who have attempted to define the term. Bar- nard writes as follows : "The term was applied here, as well as in the early Acts of Virginia and other states, in the same sense, in which it was used in England, at the same and much earlier date, to characterize a Grammar School unrestricted as to a class of children or scholars specified in the instru- ments by which it was founded, and so supported as not to depend on the fluctuating attendance and tuition of scholars for the maintenance of the master." 4 In an article on the first common schools of New England, Bush says, "A free school — that is, a school for gratuitous instruction of poor children (as in this sense only were the early schools in this country free) can be traced back to the early ages of the Christian church." 5 Brown, in his work on the Middle Schools, in speaking of Leach's study says : "This is a clear and carefully guarded statement and seems to be borne out by the documentary evidence presented. It should be remem- bered, however, that in our colonial period, a'freeschool'was generally one in which school fees of one sort or another were regularly paid by 3 Leach, English Schools at the Reformation, 110-114. 4 Am. Journal of Ed., Vol. I., 300. 5 Report of Com. of Ed., '96 and '97, Vol. II., 1168. 86 The Free School all but the poorest pupils; and was, moreover, a school of secondary grade, that is, a Latin grammar school." 6 Bearing these conflicting interpretations in mind, let us ex- amine the various instances in the town records where this term is used. Of the fourteen towns in whose records I find the term " free school " mentioned, twelve fall readily into one or the other of two classes, (i) the term used in connection with town action providing for the support of the master other than by tuition, and (2) the term used for the first time when change was made from support of the master by tuition and rate to support by general taxation. Four towns fall in the first class. Boston in 1636, or at least the richer inhabitants, gave " toward the maintenance of a free schoolmaster for the youth with us " an amount a trifle over 40 pounds. Nowhere is there any information which would lead one to believe that tuition was charged. In 1682 the town took the following action, "The same day it was voted by ye inhabitants yt the same Comittee with ye Select men consider of & pvide one or more Free Schooles for the teachings of Children to write & Cypher within this towne." 7 In 1686 we find the following record: "And the standing charge of this town at this time is about 400 pounds ann — aboue 200 pounds of which is in maintaininge three Free Schooles, mending the highways in Bostone, Rumny Marsh, & Mudie River." 8 The inhabitants of Dedham in 1644 "did with vnanimous consent declare by voate their willingness to promote that worke promising to put too their hands to prouide main- tainance for a Free Schoole in our said Towne "And farther did resolute & consent testefyinge it by voate to rayse the some of Twenty pounds p annu : towards the maintaining of a schoole mr to keep a free Schoole in our said Towne." It is difficult to determine whether this first school in Dedham was a Grammar School or not. Martin states that the " Dedham school furnished elementary instruction in English, writing, and the art of arithmetic " 9 but he does not give his authority for the statement. This would, of course, put the school out of 6 Brown, The Making of Our Middle Schools, 32. 7 Report of the Boston Rec. Com., Vol. XIV, 158. 8 Ibid., 187. "Martin: Evolution of the Mass. Public School System, 51. The Free School 87 secondary rank. Since there is no reference made in the records to the curriculum of the school until 1653, when the master " un- dertakes to teach to read English and the Accidence & to write & the knowledge & art of Arithmetick & the rules & practice thereof," one may infer something from the preceding teacher. Slafter states that the teacher for the first seven years was Ralph Wheelock, educated at Clare Hall, Cambridge University and took his degrees in 1626, and 1631. 10 With a teacher of such calibre it seems more than probable that the school was of secondary rank. In the Dorchester Records for 1642 we find the following: "It is hereby ordered and all the present Inhabitants of Dorchester aforsayd Whose named are heervnto subscribed" bequeathed and gave away their right and interest in Tomsons Island" for and Towards the maintenance of a free schoole in Dorchester aforsaid for the instructinge and Teching of Children and youth in good literature and Learninge." 11 Again in 1655 we find the term used in the contract between the teacher and the selectmen : "First that Icabod with the consent of his father shall from the : 7 : of March next ensueinge vnto the end of three full years from thence to be compleate and ended Instruct and teach in a free Schoole in Dorchester all such Children as by the Inhabitants shall be committed to his Care in Ennglish Latin and Greek and also in writinge as hee shall be able." 12 Then follows the clause in which the selectmen agree to pay the master to the amount of twenty-five pounds. Roxbury in 1645 enacted as follows : "Whereas, the Inhabitants of Roxbury, in consideration of their relligeous care of posteretie, have taken into consideration how necessarie the education of thiere children in Literature will be to fitt them for public service, both in Churche and Commonwealthe, in succedinge ages, They therefore unanimously have consentd and agreed to erect a free schoole in the said Towne of Roxburie, and to allow Twenty pounds per annum to the Schoolemaster, to bee raised out of the Messuages and part of the lands of the severall donors. " always provided that none of the Inhabitantes of the said Towne of Roxburie that shall not joyne in this act with the rest of the Donors shall have any further benefit thereby than other strangers shall have who are no Inhabitantes." 13 10 Slafter: The Schools and Teachers of Dedham, Mass., 8, 11. 11 Dorchester Records, 104-5. 12 Ibid., 73-4. 13 Dillaway: Hist, of the Gr. School in Roxbury, 7-9, 30. 88 The Free School At the close of the contract made between the feofees and the master in 1668 follow the names of fifty-four persons whose children have right to the school and in a fourth column headed " gratis " are the names of four others indicating, of course, that the children of those families were to be taught free of charge. In the second general division mentioned at the beginning of the chapter we have the following towns. In the records for Charlestown for 1671 we find that the master was paid 30 pounds by the town and 20 shillings by each pupil. He taught them to read, write, cipher, and prepared such as wished for college. 14 Eight years later the following action was taken: "It was put to vote to the Inhabitants of the town whether they would make a free school in this town by allowing fifty pounds per annum in or as money and a convenient house for the school master who is to teach Latin, writing, cyphering and to perfect children in reading En- glish." 15 Duxbury in 1741, when the change was made to a moving school, voted that while the schoolmaster kept school in the various quarters " that the school shall be a free school for the whole town, for any of the said inhabitants to send their children into any of the above-mentioned quarters where the school may be kept." 16 In 1701 Maiden under the proddings of the Court changed from the plan of encouraging a private school to a town school. The following excerpt from the recorded action is of interest to us: "And he is to have ten pounds paid him by the town for his pains. The school js to be free for all ye Inhabitants of ye town "" Newbury in a similar change from private to town school enacted as follows: "there was ordered and voted that the towne should by an equal proportion according to mens estates by way of rates pay foure and twenty pounds by the yeare to maintain a free school to be kept at the meeting house " 14 Frothingham: Hist, of Charlestown, 177. 15 Ibid., 184. 18 Duxbury Rec, 270. 17 Corey: History of Maiden, 602. The Free School 89 The town of Northampton in 1693 changed the method of paying the master, and took upon itself the entire responsibility by voting "to give forty pounds per year for A Schoole Master that might be attained fit for the worke and the aboue said sum of forty pounds they Agree to pay for one yeare And the Scholers to go free." 18 Watertown voted in 1667 to support the master by general tax and " the town agreed that the Schoole should be Free to all the settled Inhabitanc : Children that thir friends Hue in other towns to pay as before :" Outside of these main divisions but bearing on the topic are the acts of two towns and a bequest made to the town of Salem. Ipswich in 1643 made provision for the education of seven free scholars but the school was not called a " free school " when this action was taken. 19 Plymouth in determining the method of support and amount of tuition to charge for the various subjects in the curriculum excepted " the children of such as through poverty are rendered oncapable of pay." At no time was the school in Plymouth called a " free school." In 1724, " Samuel Brown grants unto the Grammar school, in Salem, 120 pounds passable money to make the same a free school, or toward the educating of eight or ten poor scholars yearly." Mr. Brown also made a bequest to the English school so that the income might be applied " toward making the same a free school or for learning six poor scholars." 20 This completes the available data — let us see how well the definitions of the term previously quoted are borne out by the records. Mr. Barnard it will be recalled defined the " free school " as a Grammar School, endowed, unrestricted as to social class, and not dependent upon tuition. But it is clear that the term was not restricted to Grammar Schools for in Boston writing schools were called " free schools ;" in Salem the English school is called a " free school " in the bequest ; and the " free schools " of Duxbury and Maiden were elementary and not secondary schools. 18 Trumbull: History of Northampton, Vol. I., 426. 19 Waters: Ipswich in the Mass. Bay Colony, 146. 20 Felt: Annals of Salem, Vol. I., 445. go The Free School The wording " specified in the instruments by which it was founded " indicates that an endowed school was meant for the ordinary church-town or town school had no instruments of foundation other than a town vote. Of all the schools men- tioned but three were endowed at the dates given — Roxbury, Salem, and Dorchester. In 1648 Tomson's Island was taken from the town of Dorchester by the Court and yet we find the term used in '55. Roxbury, the best example of an endowed school, was a " free school " because of its endowment but it was not unrestricted as to class of children attending. School privileges were confined, in fact, to the children of subscribers and such poor children as the subscribers saw fit to admit. Under the general educational conditions of the colony to have designated a school as a " free school " merely to indicate that it was open to all classes would have been a highly useless distinction. With the exception of the Roxbury Grammar School all the schools mentioned were town schools and controlled by the town directly or through the town's representatives, the selectmen, or through feofees elected by the town for the first few years of the school history as in Dorchester and in Dedham. The select- men directly, and therefore the town indirectly, were held re- sponsible for the education of all the children in the town by the Act of 1642; the Act of 1647 made the school compulsory. Under these conditions how could there have been any class distinctions with respect to schools which would have made the term " free school " of any meaning? Compulsory education and compulsory schools make such a reference totally beside the mark. And finally, the definition of a " free school " as given and the statement that this was the English meaning of the term is not upheld by Leach. The definition given by Bush — a school which gave gratuitous instruction to poor children — has little or no support from the records. Plymouth and Ipswich gave such free instruction but the school was not called a " free school." In Brown's bequest to Salem he hopes to make a " free school " or, failing in that, to educate a number of poor children in which case we are to infer it would not be a " free school." Neither does there seem sufficient basis for Brown's interpre- tation of the term. We find in all but two of the towns which established " free schools " that the amount of maintenance pro- The Free School 91 vided was equal to the salary of the master. This precludes the charging of fees, and no mention is made of poor children. The two towns mentioned are Boston and Dorchester ; in the former the amount of contributions was but 10 pounds less than the master was receiving fourteen years afterwards, hence it seems probable that the master's salary was provided for without any supplement from tuition charges; and in Dorchester the intent, at least, was to make the rent of the Island cover the costs of the school. No mention is made of tuition charges in the lengthy and detailed school code and from the general disposition of the town towards school affairs which has already been stated at length it seems highly probable that tuition fees were not charged. That the " free school " was not always a Latin gram- mar school has been previously shown. Other meanings than those given may be imagined but they as well as those given suffer the disadvantage of taking a decidedly less for the more obvious use of the term. On the basis of the records themselves we may assert that the primary meaning of the term " free school " as used in Massachusetts meant freedom from charge for being taught, and, as a corollary, schools were unrestricted as to whom should be taught except in Roxbury and in the case of non-residents. We have seen, too, from the records quoted in Chapter IV. that the free school except it was governed by the conditions imposed by the present concep- tion of the term was not long in existence. The conditions which were fundamental to its permanency have already been stated in the conclusions of the preceding chapter. In conclusion: We have shown that the support of the poor, and the support of the church before it reached the final stage of development — general taxation — passed through the prelimin- ary stages of the voluntary and the compulsory contribution; we have shown the close connection between the school and the church; we have presented all that the records have to offer on the question of school support during the early period, and taking all the facts which bear directly and indirectly on the ques- tion, though not absolutely demonstrated it must be admitted that these facts point to the conclusion that town schools previous to 1647 were maintained by voluntary and by compulsory con- tributions. 92 The Free School We have shown that the law of 1642 made elementary edu- cation compulsory and — for the poor — made it free as well; that the cost of the education of such children was borne by the community. To what extent such free education of a few children in a community was influential in determining that all children be schooled at public expense cannot be definitely known, but with a growing spirit of democracy and its tendency to wipe out class distinctions it seems probable that this pro- vision was a factor in the general line of experience which resulted in school support by general taxation. And lastly, the records of the four towns, as examples, show that the method of tuition and supply or rate and tuition was not a method that would maintain a permanent school and avoid a fine which at the time seemed to be one of the highest educational motives. These records and the chart which follows show the closest of relationships between the maintenance of a school and the opportunity afforded all children to attend with least amount of inconvenience, and this maintenance was granted in the great majority of cases only on condition of equality of opportunity. This gave permanent basis for the free school — publicly controlled and publicly supported though the " free school " had existed for a time much earlier but on a different basis of support. LIST OF REFERENCES CONSULTED Histories and Historical Essays — General Byington, E. H. The Puritan in England and New England. Boston, 1897. Campbell, Douglas. The Puritan in Holland, England, add America. New York, 1892. 2 v. Doyle, John Andrew. English Colonies in America. New York, 1907 2 v. Eggleston, Edward. The Transit of Civilization. New York, 1901. Howard, George Elliott. An Introduction to the Local Constitutional History of the United States, in the Johns Hopkins University Studies in Historical and Political Science, extra v. 4. Baltimore, 1889. Nichols, Sir George. A History of the English Poor Law. New York, 189S, 2 v. Osgood, Herbert L. The American Colonies in the Seventeenth Cen- tury, New York, 1907, 3 v. Histories and Historical Essays — New England and Massachusetts Douglas, Charles H. J. Financial History of Massachusetts from the organization of the Massachusetts Bay Colony to the American Revolution, in Columbia University Studies in History, Economics, and Public Law, V. I., No. 4. New York, 1892. Ellis, George E. Puritan Ag^e and Rule in the Colony of Massachusetts Bay 1629-85. Hutchinson, Thomas. The History of Massachusetts from the first settlement thereof in 1628 until the year 1750. Boston, 1795. 2 v. Palfrey, John Gorham. History of New England. Boston, 1883, 5 v. Weeden, William B. Economic and Social History of New England, 1620-1789. Boston, 1894, 2 v. Winthrop, John. The History of New England from 1630 to 1649, second edition, edited by James Savage. Boston, 1853. Church Histories Dexter, Henry Martin. The Congregationalism of the last Three Hun- dred Years as Seen in its Literature. New York, 1886. Felt, Joseph B. The Ecclesiastical History of New England. Boston, 1855, 1862, 2 v. Walker, Williston. History of the Congregational Churches in the United States. New York, 1894, 2 v. 94 List of References Consulted Histories of Education Barnard. American Journal of Education, Vol. I. Brown, Elmer Ellsworth. The Making of Our Middle Schools. New York, 1903. Bush, George Gary. The First Common Schools of New England, in the report of the Commissioner of Education in the United States, 1896-1897, pp. 1165-1186. Dexter, Edwin Grant. A History of Education in the United States. New York, 1904. Dillaway, C. K. A History of the Grammar School or the "Free School of 1645 m Roxburie." Roxbury, i860. Leach, Arthur Francis. English Schools at the Reformation. West- minster, 1896. Martin, George H. The Evolution of the Massachusetts Public School System. New York, 1894. Monroe, Paul. History of Education. New York, 1905. de Montmorency, J. E. G. The Progress of Education in England; a sketch of the development of English educational organization from early times to the year 1904. London, 1904. de Montmorency, J. E. G. State Intervention in English Education; a short history from the earliest times. Cambridge, 1902. Slafter, Carlos. The Schools and Teachers of Dedham Massachusetts. Dedham, 1905. Suzzallo, Henry. The Rise of Local School Supervision in Massachusetts, in Teachers College Contributions to Education. New York, 1906. Updegraff, Harlan. The Origin of the Moving School in Massachusetts, in Teachers College Contributions to Education. New York, 1908. Records and Laws of the Massachusetts Bay Colony Shurtleff, Nathaniel B. (editor). Records of the governor and company of the Massachusetts Bay in New England. Boston, 1853-54, 5 v. Whitmore, William H. (editor). The colonial laws of Massachusetts. Reprinted from the edition of 1660, with supplements to 1672, containing also the Body of Liberties of 1641. Boston, 1889. Ames, Ellis, and Goodell, Abner Cheney (editors). Acts and Resolves of the Province of the Massachusetts Bay. Boston, 1 869-1 896, 8 v. Local Histories Andover, Historical Sketches of. Sarah Loving Bailey. Boston, 1880. Billerica, History of. Henry A, Hazen. Boston, 1883. Cambridge, History of. Lucien R. Paige. Boston, 1877. Charleston, History of. Richard Frothingham. Boston, 1845. Dedham, History of. Erastus Worthington. Boston, 1827. Fitchburg, Massachusetts, History of the town of, comprising also a history of Lunenberg from its first settlement to the year 1764. Fitchburg, 1865. Hadley, History of. Sylvester Judd. Northampton, 1865. List of References Consulted 95 Haverhill, History of. George Wingate Chase. Haverhill, 1861. Ipswich, History of, Essex, and Hamilton. Cambridge, 1834. Lancaster, History of. A. P. Marvin. Lancaster, 1879. Maiden, History of. Deloraince Pendre Corey. Maiden, 1899. Newbury, History of. John J. Currier. Boston, 1902. Northampton, History of. James Russell Trumbull. Northamptan, 1898. Salem, Annals of. Joseph B. Felt. Salem, 1845. Springfield, The First Century of the History of. Henry M. Burt. Springfield, 1899. Springfield, History of. Mason A. Green. Springfield, 1888. Palmer, History of the Town of, 1 716-1889. J. H. Temple. Palmer, 1889. Pelham, History of the Town of, 1 738-1898. C. O. Parmenter. Am- herst, 1898. Town Records Boston, Record Commissioners, Reports of. Town Records and Select- men's Records, 1634-1700, v. 2 and 7. Town Records, 1701-1813, v. 12, 14, 16, 18, 26, 31, 35. Selectmen's Records, 1701-1798, v. 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 20, 24, 26. Boston, 1881-1905. Braintree, Records of the Town of. Edited by Samuel A. Bates. Ran- dolph, Mass., 1886. Brookline and Muddy River, Records of, 1634-1838. Boston, 1875. Cambridge, Records of the Town of, 1 630-1 703. Cambridge, 1901. Dedham, The Early Records of the Town of, 1 636-1 706. Dedham, 1892-94. Dorchester, Town Records of, 1631-1687. In Report of the Record Commissioners, Boston, v. 4. Boston, 1880. Dudley, Town Records of , 1732-94. Pawtucket, Rhode Island, 1893. 2 v. Duxbury, Copy of the Old Records of the Town of, Plymouth, 1893. Fitchburg, The Old Records of the Town of, 1764-89. Fitchburg, 1898, 2 v. Lunenberg, The Early Records of, 1719-64. Fitchburg, 1896. Manchester, Town Records of, 1 636-1 786. Salem, 1889, 2 v - Plymouth, Records of the Town of, 1636-1743. Boston, 1889, 2 v. Salem, Town Records of. Essex Historical Collections, v. 9, pt. 1., 5-232. Salem, 1876. Tisbury, Records of the Town of, 1 669-1 864. Boston, 1903. Watertown Records, 1634-1822. Watertown, 1894-1900, 3 v. »* V : P