'1 All 3^^ A^f t^itm -ImYV^ and Aortlmfit HISTORICAL SOCIETY. TRACT No. 34— NOVEMBER, 1876. THK IVI^KORY P» ^ P» E R S VOLUME ONE. By C. C. BALDWIN. HISTORICAL SOCIETY. TRACT No. 34— NOVEMBER, 1876. to ^' T H K M A. R a R Y F A^ R K R S . VOLUME ONE. By C. C. BALDWIN. Decouvertes et Etablissements des Fran- cais dans I'Ouest et dans le Sud de rAmer- ique, Septentrionale, 1014-1754. Memoires et Dojuments Originaux recue- illss el publics par Pierre Mariiry, Premiere partie, 1614-1684. Paris, 1875. Tiie .great West was, until a comparativeiy late period* under the dominion of France. Frenchmen made tlie first discoveries. Many years ago tuey made settlements, traded, and occupied the country until, with the capture of Quebec in 1760, ail the Western posts were surrendered to Great Britain. It is then to France that we must look for its earlv histcy. It is only within a i^vv years that extensive researches have I een made in that cnmiry. T'lie Stite of New York expended a very large sum to pub- lish in eleven immense quarto vol- umes documents of especial interest in that State. For the history of New En- gland, New Jersey, and Louisiana other in- vestigations have'been made. A quiet gen- tleman of Paris, M. Pierre Margry, long connected witu the Department of the Ma- rine, has devoted many years to gathering what V70uld illustrate the foreign history of France, especially in America. He has al- ready rendered this country great service in the investigations already referred to. His manuj^cripts, vet unpublished, were care- fully collected from all parts of France and are unique. The knowledge of these treasures could not, but make their publics tion much desired. W^ere it not for the "Boston Are" this would have been done by private hands, but that con flaaratiou d'estroymg sueli hopes. Congress came to Ihi rescue and appropriated a sum, not too large, in the purchase of copies to encourage the publication of such portions as relate to our own country. This plan of publication originated with the Historical Society at Cleveland and was warmly seconded by Mr. Parkmau and by other societies and historical scholars throughout the country. The first of the nine volumes is indeed full of interest. The materials for the early French history in this countrv are in sorje respeiJts very full and in others very scanty. The Jesuits were powerful in the New World and their Relations were regularly transmitted to the tnother country." But the Jesuits were not all the colony nor were all the discoveries made under their auspices, though they apparently desired that it should be so. La Salle was the first discoverer of the Ohio, tiie first to trace the Mississippi to the sea. The French rested their claim to the ijreat West mainly upon these facts, and to-day his portrait adorns the Capitol at Washington as one of the four great discoverers of America. But he is hardlv mentioned in these Relations. M. Margry has done more than any other to recover the history of La Salic. The hacd- sonie vo ume before us is ornamented with his portrait as he appeared in his younger days, with long curls and the dress of a man of the world. There is, however, a determin- ation in the tace and a restless, dreamy look to tl e eves as if the portrait was not an un- likely one for the man who, in spite of the opposition of all, could penetrate alone vast countries, could give his foitune to discov- ery, and persist with such force of will that he should be slain by his own men m a pathi'ess wilderness, thousan s of miles from even the settlements of his own countrymen in tne Western world. The earlier papers in the volume relate to the RecoUets — the "first missionaries of the West and South, in North America." They THE RF^C()l>LETS- INDIAN TRADE. were professedlj' poor and plain. They hast- ened to the new hind and establislied a con- vent at QuL'bec and posts at other places. The Jesuits came over alter, partly on their invi- tation, and in the end very decidedly turned thcni out of Canada. The second, and iartrer pap^r, is a meuioir deiiiiins; relief for them from the obstacles placed in their way by the. Jesuits, and the Government of Canada couirollcd l)y that order. There seems to have been danger that in a few years there would not be a Kecoiiet in Canada. This strife between the rehsrious .sects deserves a paper of its own. The Jesuits, ar first, cer- taiiily very devout and self-sacrificinji men, and sometimes martyrs, were too devoted to the success of their order, and the Colo- nial GovernmeMt was bamj-ered by them. The Government at home opposed them secretly and not openly, llecolels were meant to be enconrajfed to offset them The Count de Front eoac in bis letters wrote earnestly apears much history of La balle, his plans, expenses, drafts upon his family and friends, how lie built upon Lake Ontario and planned to build upon Lake Erie and further west; how he built on the Niagara river, on the river St. Joseph in the south- west part of Michigan, and away within the wilds of Illinois, among the tribe of that name, the fourth fort, Crevccoeur. An in- terestinsr memoir is that of a friend or the Abbe de GaUinee relating, from the infor- mation of La Salle himself, the particulars of his journey with the Abbe, including accounts of the Indian trilies and their manners. In 1009 Gallinee, Dollier,and La Salle left Montreal to seek the Ohio known by report. They turned toward its source, but the Iroquois dissuaded the two priests from the journe,y,much to the dissatisfaction of La Salie, and the party turned to the north ofLakeErie. The report of Abbe (Gallinee of this journey is also in this volume. From it we extract but a single word, Paouitiko- ungraentaouak, the Algonkin name for the Chippeways. The feelings of La Salle were with the Recollets They were first; the Jesuits came after (says the memoir), and the Recollets gave them half their house. The Jesuits shortly got the other half and the Recollets had hard work to gel it back. The Jesuits were established in Quebec, "where they are absolute masters" L'Evesque(lhe Governor) was their creature THE JESUITS-a.A SALLE. and would do nothing without them. La Salle complaine that the Jesuits sought to control trade. One Indian said that "when the Black Robes were among us we wor- shipped God, but when there were no more beavers we see them no more." The Jesuits disliked La Salle very much. Frontecac in this volume (page 323) says "their design, as it appeared in the end, was to set a trap whicliever path I took, or to derange every- thing, to place the country m disorder from which they would not hesitate to profit, and to ruin M. de la Salle." ''He has become the object of their envy and aversion." This enmity wa^ no doubt much prompted by their pious zeal. They had made discoveries. Their map of Lake Su- perior of 1671 was almost wonderful They were searching for the Mississi|)pi ,and their schemes of power, wealth, and dominion, for their order in the great valley of North America, may have been as grand and mag- nificent as those of La Salle for his King. The paper lets us into such lively views of the times as are not given in ordinary his- tory, and we see how, after all, love of gain, love of power, and joalf^usy of others in- fluenced history in such solitu'^'es as would seem to be free from such disturbing ele- ments if any fretdum could be found. The most valuable paper of the volume is called a "Relation of the Discoveries and Travels of Sir de la Salle, Lord and Gov- ernor of Fort Frontenac, beyond the greur, lakes of New France, made by order of M. Colbert, 1679-80-81." It is a narrative cov- ering 150 pages of the events of those years, and probably the official report made after the return of La Salle to Montreal. In 1677 La Salle was in France. He was already famous and of influence. His scheme was vast. He wanted to penetrate to the great valley of our continent and lay there the foundation of powerful colonies "in a country temperate in climate, rich and fer- tile, and capable of a grand cmmerce." Such hold of the continent would betaken that, at the next war with Spain, France could oust her in North America. In the commencement of 1679 he built the Griffin, the first vessel navigatng Lake Ene, meeting some opposition from* the Iroquois, but less because ihat nation was at war beyoud Lake Erie. The early part of the story is well known from other sources, but 'he narrative of La Saile's travels after he left Fort Crevecoeur and parted with the expediiion to the North has never been told so completely as here. We wish we could present the whole paper to our English readers, but we cannot follow in detail the straight, business-like story of adventure, travel, description of countries and Indian nations, contests, diplomacy, discouragements and perseverance. The Iroquois traveled from their homes in Ne"' York all through the West, and it was dan- gerous to take sides or not to. They were then fighting the Illinois and the Miahiis. First living south of Lake Ontario, the best armed and most warlike tribe in America, they defeated and exterminated (says our memoir) all their neighbors. They bore their arms to the Guli of St. Lawrence, to the North Sea, in Florida, and even beyond the river Missis- sippi. They have (says the writer) in thir- ty years destroyed over 600,000 liyes, and made desert most of the country round the great lakes. La Salle had expected the Griffin with sup- plies for his journey down the river. He never saw the vessel again. She was lost, he believed by treachery, and he must return for succor. Early in 1680 he reached St. Joseph. He found two men whom he hd sent around the lake, but they did not find the Griffin. Arrived at length at Niairara, he found he had also lost a snip with supplies from France. He reached Montreal, May 6th, 1680 His cred- itors had siezed his property and his resources seemed entirely wasted. On his return to Frontenac he learned by letter from Tonty that his men left at Crevecoeur had deserted after de- str jying|thefort, carrying away whatproper- tv they could and destroying the balance. They destroyed Fort St. Joseph and also seized La Salle's property at isiiagara. He was not disheartened. He started to succor Tonly and save if he could the vessel build- ing on the Illinois with which he meant to descend to the sea. November 4ih, 1680, he reached the mouth of the St. Joseph. The Irociuois nad fought the Illinois, and as he approached Crevecoeur there were only scenes of death and devastation. When he reached that post he found it silent; the planks of his vessel were there and on one of them was written, "Nous sommes tous savages ce 19 A — , 1680" — we are all sav- ages. Was it orophetic that he had named the fort Crevecoeur (Broken Heart). The romantic interest of the relation is here at its height, but La Salle does not stop to dwell upon the picture. His first thought was, did the A mean Aout or Avril, August or April. He wished to find the faithful Tonty. Tonty's fate appears pa''t~ ly in this relation and partly his ' subsequent memoir in ti. volume. Not the Jesuits alone regarded 1 Salle with jealousy. The Iroquois wef without r'iason fearful that the TV tribes would be armed against them vf- arms and other assistance, -and that f trade in the West would draw from 6 lA SALLE— HENNEPIN. own profits willi tiie Dutch and Eniilish. While Tonty Wiis absent the deperlion had taiien place. Afior he reiurned be was cap- tuied l)y the Iroquois. In May, Kisi. atler unsuccesoful search and hatd l.ibors, i)iiildin2 up Indian succors and sircngtli. La Salk' lelt the fort on the St. Joseph for Michiliiuackinnc,\viicre he found Tonty and Father MenU)ie. They returned 10 Frontenac, and this [.aper is the relation to that time. Of his new, wonderful rejurrcction of recourses and eventual success we do not speak, allhouiih a new and brief relation of it from information of his brother is also in this volume. The resolute will and wonderful power of La SaKe appear nowhere so stront^ly as in the narrative we have quoted. Tliere seems almost a direct triumph of will over every opposition, of mind over matter. This is the fullest, most explicit; and valuable ■ac- count of this series of expeditions. By whom was it commitred to wriiinLrV Evi- dently by some one fully informed and from notes made day by day, wiili dales as in a diary. This, as well as the expedition of 1682, wdiereln he descended the Missis- sippi, Ware made under the commission of 1678, ^'herein the Kins wa^ ur.iciously pleased to pfM'mit Ln Saile to discover these new lands (provided he did it at his own ex- ]iense. Tlieoliicial leport of the last expedi- tion was made by Father Zenolie Membre. a Recollet. See La Salle's memoir to Seiiinclay, in Falconer's Mi.ssissipoi and Oreiron, which leaves it almost doubt fid whether La Salle did not mean to say thai Membre wiote the oflicial report of all his expeditions under the leave of 16TN. Mem- bre was with La Salle in the first oue, and it seems p/oltable that he drew this report. It ends with the embarkation of La Saile on Lake Ontario for Mona-eal, the la.st of AuiTust, 1681, and then adds the hope that the end of the year 1682 will tiud the dis- covery of the mouth of '.he Mississippi made. Some parts of the repori relating to those parts of the journey where Ilenn'cpin wa.s present bear a sirikiniT resemblance to his first book, published in 1684. I translate, for instance, from paize 440. The two re- ports are word for word the same, except ^. where dUerences are marked, this report as '-.^Aand Hennepin as 2. coQimfThe Steur de La Salle could not buHd a trade -que at Fort de Froutenuc becau.se of a the he. a>re of two leagues at the great fall of ting thenra. withtmt which one could sail in a aud seliin-essej to Fort Frontenac to tiie bottom prices thavj (lllinMs. 1) (Dauphin, 2) tjy the lakes volume si are with reason called fresh water The great river of St. Lawrence takes its origin from several great lakes, among which are five of an extraordmary size, and wliich are badly laid down in the printed maps. These lakes are (1. Lake Superior, the Lakeof the Illinois, tiie Lake of the Hu- rons, the Lake Erie, the Lake Frontenac); (2, the first Lake de Conde, or (Tracy, second. Lake Dauphin or of the Illinois, the third, Lake of Orleans or of the Hu- rons, fourth, Lake de Conty or Erie, and fifth, Ltike Ontario named de Frontenac.) They are all of fresh water and verv good to drink, abounding in fish and surround- ed l)y fertile lands. With the exceptiou of the first, navigation is easy in sum- mer even for large vessels, hut diflicult in winter Itecause of the strong winds which blow there." I might continue the parallel at some length. The account of Hennepin's journey among the Sioux bears a similar ver- bal similarity. On page 478 of this volume appears the l)effinning of that part trans- lated by Mr. Shea in his r>isnovery of the Mississiotii, and continuinii for four or five page.; Hennepin, however, calls the Mis.sissippi "(Jolbert " By very far the larger part of ihe repori; bears no resemblance to Hernepin. Hen- nepm was not above cop.int; the report had he wished to do so for his lioik. Mucli of liis second book was cop^d from the sup- pressed Le Clercq Siii! I cannot but think that those Darts of the paper which have much resemblance to Hennepin bear his mark. His egotism and desire for promi- nence are apparent. "The Fallier Louis Hennepin offered him- self to make this journey" (to the Sioux,) ■'to commence acquainiance with nations among whom he had thought he would go soon to establish him.selt in preach- ing the faith. " Pa2;e 440. The carpenters are said to have been sent to Niagara under the charge of La Motte and Father Louis Hennepin. In other accounts it is said La Motte had change. Page 444. The carpenters would have been frightened awav by the Senecas if La Salle and Father Louis had not taken pains to reassure them. There are examples of the vanity characteristic of Hennepin's book 3|uickly noticed by anyone w'.io has read Mr. Siiea's excellent bibiiographical sketch of that work. The differences are sugges'ive. In Hennepin the account is occasionally en- larged by introduction of other matter as it by atte- thought. The forms of the names of the lakes bear the stamp of the wilder- ness Su|)erior, of the Illinois, of the Hurons. Erie, in Hennepin called in compliment to Frenchmen, de Conde or Tracy, Dauphin, d'Orlcans, de Conty. Hennepin's own name is in this paper HENNEPIN— TONTY; Henpin, while La Saile in his letters calls him Hempin. Henpin was not unlikely the original, euphonised by speech into Hempin and by himself to the more musical Hen- nepin. At the time this relation was made Henne- pin had returned from his captivity, and he probably furnished his repoit in writinir, used by his brother RecoUet in a friendly spirit. He very liKely met La Salle himself, who writes, in Au<;ust,lo a friend in France, that Hennepin was about to s:o to France; that he would not hesitate to exaggerate; "it is his character," and he speaks "nearer what he wishes than what he does." t doubt not the report cf Hennepin was quite cut short in Ibis paper; in fact,itso apoej'rs. Followin2: this relation is the recital from Nicholas de la Salle of the discovery of th'j mouth of our areat river, in 1683, and the return to Quebec. Nest is a "eneral rela- tion of the enterprises of La Salle from 1678 to 1683 made by Tonty, who^e nickname, "Main de fer," — hand of iron — rcudnds one of the knights of old whi e his heart was as stout and trusty as bis hand — a real hand of iron, by the way, found by more than one Indian to give a verj^ heavy blow. Tonty was successively commander at Ni- agara, Crevecoeur and Fort St. Louis, and desc ended the Mississippi with LaSalle. The contents of these 600 pagas cannot be made known in a review. Their value consists mainly in the more complete variety and perfect knowledge which they givu of these great enterprises of which we had some pre- vious knowledge. Their apparent value in- creases by comparison with less authentic and particular accounts. LaSalle is by all means the most prominent figure in interior discovery. We have indicated how vast his plans. His life was romantic, his death tragic. In later times claims to large terri- tories were made under hisdi'^covenes. The Fiench claimed u; der that right even the 0"iio and the forts at Pittsburg and Erie, wrested from them by the English. Still later the population, French by extraction, leaned to the United States in the Revolu- tionary war and made easy such occupation and control as gave the United States tl e Northwest Territory. In siil! later limes, when our Northwestern boundary was dis- Duted, La Salle's doings were discussed as if on them turned the fate of vast territory. We say then that we feel under great ob- ligation to M. Margry who, with patriotic care, has collected and preserved much valaable matter; and we werj before this publication much indebted for the liberal use of his treasures he has permitted to Americans. While it has given the public a foretaste of his riches, it has stimulated that patriotic zeal which makes the student of history desire access to the original authorities, so that he can see for himself the original and life-like records of the times. The English reader cannot better estimate the value of this volume than to see how often ia the Discovery of the Great West these unpublished treasures have been to Mr. Parkman his best and frequently his only guide. The early maps which accom- pany these and other relations have not been yet pul)lished We hope M. Marsry may be able to furnish them. Some of the early manuscript maps are vastly in advance of those published. On seeint, them, one has a profound respect for the discoverers, somewhat, it must be confessed, at the expense of the early geographers. Some of the best and clearest evidences of what was done and known, artse/from the maps. ' LIBRftK". C'= CONGRESS {||!|i||i|j|i|i]!f !|i|||||i|i iin||i|iii 014 433 1S8 \ LIBRARY OF CONGRESS 014 433 168 • Conservation Resources Lig-Free® Type I Ph 8.5, Buffered