) a nmmitutiuu* 1 £ Class sT ) A fa glg- / VVHM f HULLINIA^- 2 OR, Selections from Local History:" INCLUDING THE SIEGE OF HULL, OUR ANCIENT CHURCHYARDS, AXD PAST POETS OF HULL. • • # By JOHN SYMON3, M.R.I. A., AUTHOB OF ' ; HIGH STREET, HULL," ETC. " if ^realt of ancient tinted"- — gnjilew. Kingston-uiDon-Hull: W. Adams, 23, Market-place; London : Kent & Co., Paternoster-row. 1872. i o« n '01 TO THE RIGHT HONORABLE LORD TALBOT DE MALAHIDE, F.S.A., M.R.I. A., PRESIDENT OF THE ROYAL ARCH/EOI OGICAL INSTITUTE OF GREAT BRITAIN ( , AND IRELAND, THIS "^HEMNEgl" IS MOST RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED. j J y*r r** °^ ™^ cu^aaZ^ cU#* 'id oLiUi - h(yw^ If, V \ vtf N presenting this little volume to the public, I may state at (S? the outset that it is simply a miscellaneous collection of local historical incidents and sketches compiled from the best authorities. My motives for placing them in a more permanent form than manuscript are many. I well remember the late E. E. Collins, when Editor of the " Hull Advertiser ," in 1863, while lamenting in a leader over the many local worthies departed, who when living devoted their time to the welfare of the town, and whose constant endeavours to do good were deserving of some biographical notice, urged the revival of the office of Historiographer. In the same paper, June 18th, 1863, I sup- ported the views of the writer, and since that period have often sighed for the leisure, means, and ability to carry out the desire of that able liierateur, "who so soon after took his place in " man's last mansion.' ' I pointed out at the time the difficulty which lies in the way of collecting facts worthy of interest to the people without troubling families and descendants, and have since real- ized the truth of that statement, for very little information has been afforded me by those to whom I applied, and it would have rejoiced me very much to have more fully noted the noble gifts of departed ancient worthies, and to have expatiated on the real charity and benevolence of the commercial, trading and en- terprising spirits that have from time to time passed from amongst us. To have written full biographical notices of these local patriots would have proved pleasurable to me and interesting to the reader. An additional motive that set my pen moving was to in- duce the young persons of our town to peruse larger works on similar subjects, and to stimulate the mind to further research into the early annals of Kingston-upon-Hull. I don't agree with the aphorism that "a great book is a great evil." It is, at least, a great necessity, if even required only for reference. "It is one of the privileges of History, 5 ' says a sage writer, " to impart the experience of age without its infirmities — to bring back things long obscured and fast fading away." It enriches the memory w T ith a great variety of important episodes of bygone days. It also teaches us what measures and counsels make the issue of things fortunate, and points out what kind of conduct in- volves its authors in ruin. It gives unerringly wise examples for our imitation in a private as well as in a public capacity. If, then, "Hullinia," will influence my young readers to study those comprehensive and elaborate volumes that have been written upon the rise and progress of our town, and which contain much that is valuable and interesting, my object shall have been accomplished. A work of this kind necessarily borrows much ; but what- ever new information was available from the ancient records of the borough and other reliable sources, it has been freely used and incorporated with many local transactions treated of by my predecessors in the same pursuit. Besides the historical episode of the Siege of Hull, I have collated nearly all the memorials extant in our ancient Churchyards. I have added brief notices of our grand and generous old mercantile benefactors who once moved upon the stage of Hull public life, and to whom may be at- tributed the commercial prosperity of the port in which all classes at present participate, as well as of those who have contributed both by their scholarly writings and poetical productions to elevate intellectually the place of their nativity, and of whom we all may justly be proud. In conclusion, I acknowledge the aid I have received from local works. I am especially indebted to Mr. J. Holland for permission to select what I required for the sketches of Hull Poets, from his brochure on the Yorkshire Poets ; to Mr. C. T. Sadlier for superintending and examining the proofs whilst passing through the press; to Mr. W. H. Adams, to whose care has been entrusted the Typographical ar- rangement of the work ; to Mr. E. Jackman for the admirable manner in which he has copied the portraits from the originals, and to Mr. Officer for engravings kindly placed at my disposal. Finally, I commend " Hullinia " to the fostering care of my fellow-townsmen, and trust it will repay perusal. J. S. §§ CONTENTS. (HH THE SIEGE OP HULL. PAGE. The Sieges of PI all and Paris compared 1 Modes of conveying letters during the Siege of Hull 2 Character of Charles 1 3 Impeachment of the Bishops, Lord Kimbolton and five M.P.'s 4 Sir John Hotham appointed Governor of Hull 7 The King arrives at York 7 Charles and the Parliament severally desire to possess Hull 8 Preparations for the defence of Hull 9 Sir J. Hotham formally takes possession of Hull 11 Charles intends to dine with the Governor 12 The Duke of York and other Royalists enter Hull in cog. 12 The King seeks admission at Beverley Gate (Whitefriargate) ...... 13 Hull Fortifications, Gates and Walls 13—14 Extract from one of Queen Henrietta's letters to the King 20 Another stratagem to secure Hull 20 LordDigby 24 Hull re-in forced 29 Siege raised 30 Queen Henrietta at Burlington 31 Sir J. Hotham determines to surrender Hull 33 The plot discovered 33 Captain Hotham taken prisoner 34 The Governor escapes from Hull 35 — 36 Sir John and his Son committed to the Tower 36 Their trial and execution 37 — 38 Character of Sir John 39 OUR ANCIENT CHURCHYARDS. Holy Trinity Church 43 The old Chantry Chapels 48—49 Undiscovered record of the " Gilde of Blessed Virgin Mary " 50 Historical sketch of Holy Trinity 51 — 53 Wakes, or Feasts of Dedication , ... 53—54 CONTENTS— Continued. The planting of trees in churchyards Church Bells and Bell-ringing Holy Trinity under interdict Ancient burials The De la Pole Memorial The Plague of 1638 Reception of Charles I., in 1639 The Ncttleton Memorial Funeral Sermons Mourning The Broadley Memorial „ Ferries „ „ Whincup „ Remarkable Will of William Gee The Cogan Memorial Epitaphs, &c. St. Maey's Church Ancient notices Destruction by Henry VIII Benefactions to the Church St. Mary's restored Memorials, Epitaphs, &c PAST POETS OP HULL. Introductory , Coedman, the Father of Anglo-Saxon Poets Andrew Marvell Death of Andrew's Father and Miss Skinner Barton Ferry in olden times , An Irish view of Marvell Marvell suspected of sedition Dr. Wittie Edward Thompson , William Mason , Thomas Bridges Ralph Darlmg Nathaniel Tucker Benjamin Thompson Isaac Wilson , George Pry me The Rev. Richard Patrick . /. The Rev. Thomas Browne Conclusion PAGE. 00 56—58 58 59—62 65 66 68 71 74 74 75 76 79 80 82 83 87 87 88 90 94 35—100 102 105 107 108 109 122 123 129 131 133 136 137 139 111 142 144 140 118 151 THE SIEGE OF HULL. " May each returning tide enlarge thy store, Thy shipping safe return, increased in worth : Place of my birth — renowned in ancient lore, Commercial lord ! emporium of the North ! " SjctKfrm 'jpouertLer of zHu,CC JL member of th,t JhCo-urf^ fitcvc/e of Commons Sir John Hf)THAM. (.Fr~f?m an Ancient £ ng raring') The Siege of Hull. T was during the recent Siege of Paris that my attention was drawn to the history of the Siege of Hull, and I determined upon col- lecting all the salient points in connection therewith, and placing them on paper — simply for the purpose of impressing them upon the minds of the young mem- bers of the Hull Mechanics Institution, Since then (by request) it has been designed to publish them for public perusal ; though I am not sanguine that the following pages will be found very interesting to general readers. It is somewhat remarkable that, although above 200 years have elapsed between the Sieges of Hull and Paris, the strategy resorted to by the Prussians very much resembled that of the Royal- ists when they were before Hull, save and except the engines of war beino- of a more formidable character. When first I read of the Prussians besieging the capital, I envied the French having so strongly fortified Paris, in order to protect the inhabitants ; and thought, that if it should ever fall to our un- fortunate lot to be invaded, what a calamity it would prove if we were not fortified as heretofore. How- ever, it is thought by military authorities to be a mistake to build up bulwarks round a town or city : for at the period I am about to describe, the inhabitants of towns followed the example of feudal Barons, who garrisoned and armed their Castles to protect themselves, when the rights of society were 2 nil, LIMA. trampled under foot Communities followed this ex- ample, and fortified the places where they resided ; but in those days there were no Artillerists like unto ours of modern times ; and, consequently, it is now thought far better that towns and cities should be left open, because of the death and destruction that are dealt out through the deadly fire of monster siege guns. The besieged of Hull had no carrier pigeons for the conveyance of letters, but Dp: la Pryme tells us, in the Diary of his life, (a.d. 1695,) that h e was w *th an ingenious old man, who had been a great royalist in King Charles the First's days. " Amongst other very observable things that he had told me, and that we talked about (he continues) was, that they had a dog in their troop, that every night had letters put betwixt his neck and his collar, which was made large on purpose, and that he would have gone to any garrison or place they told him of within twenty miles round about/' Talking of other ways of sending letters privately, he said they had but two more, and they were these : " the one was to make hollow the wooden heels of a pair of shoes, and by stuffing letters therein, and then letting the flap of the inner sole fall upon the covering, so put them on a beggar's feet, and send him where they pleased. The other way they had was to carry them in a hollow stick or crutch that beggars walk with." And here let me state, while alluding by way of preliminary to the past and the present, that the scene of that great historical struggle — the Siege of Hull — is now devoted to the peaceful spirit of commerce, and known as the Humber, Prince's, and Queen's Docks : they occupy the original site of the ancient fortifications of the town, and encircle it with water, where once stood its ancient walls. It is an old maxim, that whatever prevails at sea, will in the end prevail on shore. Possessing then, as this nation does, the most formidable fleet of war ships in the world, and all our ports filled with able and patriotic seamen — without vain boast, England, at the King; Charles I- T/otu a Picture fry Old Stone, ^/?an Dyck, w the Collection ^Sr Christ 1 SykesBarV JRs Seald tlu/iy/q&s /hm tA& Originals in the 2fy6qfci*n ' .Jolm Thane ill'!. LIMA. 3 present period, has no rival in the Empire of the Seas. 11 Hence for many a fearless ago Has social quiet loved thy shore ; Xor ever proud invaders rage Or sack'd thy towers or stain'd thy fields with gore." I will now proceed to narrate a chapter from English history, when our town was besieged by a King and his army, and when our royal borough was surrounded with battlements similar to Paris in the present day ; also to relate an account of the com- mencement of the first Siege of Hull : because, by so doing, it gives me the opportunity of introducing two eminent personages — Sir John Hotham, Governor of Hull, at the period mentioned, and his son. They will be the principal performers, and as I proceed, you will be the best judges whether they deserved the punishment of death which ended their cloudy careers. I shall simply quote history, which clearly shows that, although things looked very ominous in England at the critical period I am about to allude to, yet, through Sir John Hotham's indecision of character and conduct, he certainly was the primary cause of the commence- ment of the civil war that followed, and hastened the great rebellion which ultimately brought Charles to the scaffold. A word or two on the character of this King, to prepare my readers for what transpired between him and the Governor of Hull. Flume says, "he deserved the epithet of a good, rather than of a great man ; and was more fitted to rule in a regularly established government than either to give way to the encroach- ments of a popular assembly or finally to subdue their pretensions." Unhappily, his fate threw him into a period when the precedents of many former reigns savoured strongly of arbitrary power, and the genius of the people ran violently towards liberty. Much excuse may be made for Charles's political prudence, exposed as he was to the assault of furious, implacable, and bigoted factions. In 1682, tumults were on the in- crease, England was then on the eve of revolution, 4 HULLINIA. The cry incessantly resounded against " bishops and rotten-hearted lords ;" and the former being distinguish- able by their clerical dress, were exposed to the most dangerous insults, particularly about Westminster and Whitehall. The bishops drew up a protest, and pre- sented it to the King, setting forth, that although they had an undoubted right to sit and vote in Parliament, yet, in coming thither, they had been menaced by the multitude, and could no longer with safety attend their duty in the House ; they moreover protested against all laws, votes, and resolutions, as null and void, which should pass during the time of their constrained absence. This protest was thought to be ill-timed — it was signed by twelve bishops, and com- municated to the King, who hastily approved of it. The Lords desired an interview with the Commons, and the opportunity was siezed with avidity and joy. An impeachment followed of high treason being sent up against the bishops, in endeavouring to subvert the laws, and to invalidate the authority of the legislature. A few days afterwards, the King was betrayed into another indiscretion, much more fatal — an indis- cretion to which all the ensuing disorders and civil wars may be immediately and directly ascribed. This was the impeachment of Lord Kimbolton and the five members. Charles, though normally moderate in temper, was a proud prince. The Commons instigated the populace to tumult and disorder ; they knew if the King only remained tranquil, and cautiously eluded this first violence of the tempest, he would, in the end, prevail. They therefore resolved, if possible, to excite him to some violent passion, in the hope that he would commit indiscretions of which they might take advantage ; and they succeeded. Charles became enraged to find his con- cessions but increased their demands. The Queen and the ladies of the Court further stimulated his passions, and represented that, if he exerted the vigour and displayed the majesty of the monarch, the daring usur HuLLIXiA. 5 pations of his subjects would shrink before him. Lord Digby suggested the like counsel. Charles, who was ever disposed to hasty resolutions, gave way to the fatal importunities of his friends. Mr. Herbert, the Attorney-General, appeared in the Upper House and in his Majesty's name entered an accusation of high treason against Lord Kimbolton and five Commoners, named Hollis, Sir Arthur Haslerig, Hampden, Pym, and Strode. The whole world stood amazed ; for these five members, (at least Pym, Hampden, and Hollis,) were the very head of the popular party. Men had no leisure to wonder at this indiscretion — others followed still more imprudent. A Sergeant-at-Arms went im- mediately in the Kings name, demanded of the House these five members, but he was sent back without any positive answer. Messengers were then employed to search for them : the King went the next day in person — irritated with the opposition — with the intention of demanding the individuals whom he had accused. It coming to the ears of the Countess of Carlisle, she privately sent intelligence to the five members, who had time to withdraw, a moment before the King entered. His Majesty was accompanied by his ordinary retinue, but left them at the door of the Commons, and he himself advanced alone through the hall, while all the members rose to receive him. The speaker withdrew from the chair, when the King took possession of it, and in an indignant speech demanded the men ; and he also took the opportunity, in concluding his remarks, of saying — " I see I cannot do what I came for : I think this is no unfit occasion to repeat what I have said formerly — that whatever I have done in favour, and to the good of my subjects, I do intend to maintain." Charles looked around for the accused members, but, not finding them, he asked the speaker whether any of them w r ere present ? The speaker fell on his knees, and said, that he had " neither eyes to see, nor tongue to speak in that place, 6 HULLINIA, . but as the House was pleased to direct him." The Com- mons were in the utmost disorder. That evening the accused members removed into the city, and the citizens were the whole night in arms. Next morning, the King sent to the Lord Mayor, ordering him to call a Common Council immediately, and about 10 o'clock, he himself, attended only by three or four lords, went to the Guildhall. He told the Council that he was sorry to hear of the apprehension entertained of him ; he had accused certain persons of high treason, against whom he would proceed in a legal way, and he presumed that they would not give them any protection in the city. After other gracious expressions, he departed without receiving the applause he expected. In passing through the streets, the cry of 4i Privilege of Parliament," resounded in all quarters ; and also the words " To your tents, O Israel ! " — the exclamation of the Israelites when they abandoned Rehoboam their Sovereign. The King, apprehensive of danger, left London. The accused members were taken daily to the House, accompanied by a tumultuous procession; and when the populace passed Whitehall they still asked with shouts " What has become of the Kino- and his Cavaliers ? " and "Whither are they fled ?" Charles — overwhelmed with grief, shame, and re- morse, and for whose ruin friends and enemies seemed equally to conspire, left London. The Queen, being secretly threatened with an impeachment, was preparing to retire into Holland. Bills sent up to the Commons, which had hitherto stopped with the Peers, and would certainly have been rejected, were passed, and pre- sented for the Royal assent : amongst which, was the bill against the votes of the Bishops in Parliament. Charles gave his assent in the hope of appeasing, for a time, the rage of the multitude ; but these concessions, however important, had no effect. They were made the foundation of demands still more extensive, and they also carried up an impeachment against the HULLINIA. 7 Attorney-General for obeying his master's commands in accusing their members. A large magazine of arms was kept in Hull, and amidst the commotion, the Commons dispatched thither Sir John Hotham, giving him the authority of Governor. This magazine was the old Manor Hall, formerly the Palace of Michael De la Pole, and was situated nearly opposite the Low r gate Church. In it were deposited enormous quantities of ammunition, arms, and strong head-pieces, corslets, muskets, carriages, &c, originally purchased by the Royalists in 1639, and forwarded to Hull. In this famous Parliament, which subsequently contended with Charles for sovereign power, sat. Sir John Hotham, Knight, who represented Beverley; young Hotham, as M.P. for Scarborough; and Sir John Lister, who, as Mayor of Hull, entertained the same King, at a previous period, at his house in the Hio-h-street ; he was also member for Hull in the long Parliament. It was about 1635, however, that Sir John Hotham's sun began to shine, and he became very popular. He had been Sheriff of the County, and very active and vigorous in collecting "ship money/' an objectionable tax ; yet, from the tenor of his subsequent conduct, he was not apparently actuated by any wish to promote the interest of King Charles. He in- sinuated himself so far into the favour of the people that he was elected a member of the House of Commons. We shall watch his conduct until we attend him and his son on the scaffold at Tower Hill. But let us in the meantime follow the footsteps of the runaway King. It appears that Charles resolved to remove farther from London, and the next news informs us that he had arrived at York, taking with him the Prince of Wales and the Duke of York. The King here found marks of attachment beyond what he ex- pected: from all quarters of England the Nobility and Gentry, personally or otherwise, expressed their duty 8 11ULLLX1A. towards him. They seemed to think one rash and passionate act on his part ought not to have brought on such violence to him and every branch of the legislature; and, however sweet the sound of liberty might be, they resolved to adhere to that moderate freedom transmitted from their ancestors rather than engage in the search after more independence. Charles, thus finding himself supported by a considerable party in the kingdom, began to speak in firmer tones. He issued proclamations ; the people's imaginations became excited with a continued dread of Catholicism, with a horror against prelacy, with an antipathy to ceremonies and the liturgy, and with a violent affection for whatever was most opposite to these objects of aversion ; the fanatical spirit once let loose, confounded all regard to ease, safety, interest, and dissolved every civil obligation. Each party was desirous to throw on its antagonists the odium of commencing a civil war. Sir John Hotham, the newly appointed Governor, though he had accepted a commission from Parliament, was not thought to be much disaffected to the Church and Monarchy. Charles, therefore, entertained hopes that, if he presented himself at Hull before the com- mencement of hostilities, Hotham, overawed by his presence, would admit him with his retinue. This town, being at that period, one of the best fortified in the kingdom, and the magazine then containing the arms of all the forces levied against the Scots, after gaining admittance, Charles thought he could easily render himself master of the place. We will now see what was being done in our own kk Royal Town/' The King, as well as Parliament, knew whichever should be so fortunate as to gain possession of Hull, would have a decided superiority, at least in the outset of the contest. Its vast magazine far exceedec. the collection of war-like stores in the Tower of London ; indeed I lull was the best furnished arsenal in England. Parliament bejng apprehensive of HULLINIA. 9 the King's intention of securing Hull, letters were written — one came from Sir Henry Vane, (Sir John Listers colleague,) in consequence of which, the Cor- poration became much alarmed; a Hall was summoned, and the town put into a state of defence. The bulwarks were strongly faced with brick ; port-holes were made towards the Harbour and Humber; arms, ammunition, and artillery were taken out of the magazine ; the in- habitants armed, and guards set to watch night and day. It is certain the King intended to become master of Hull, so that he might have a place to resort to ; on the other hand, the Parliamentarians were determined, if possible, to anticipate Charles's intentions, and nothing tends to convince us more of the great importance of this town at that period than the subtlety and con- trivance made use of to obtain possession of it. The United Kingdom became divided into two great bodies — the " Roundheads" and the " Cavaliers," according as they avowed their attachments to the new principles of freedom or to the interests of Monarchy. The origin of the former term is thus explained by Mrs. Hutchinson, in her memoirs of her husband : — She says, " when Puritanism grew into a faction, and the zealots distinguished themselves, both men and women, by several affectations of habit, looks, and words — which, had it been a real declension of vanity, and embracing of sobriety in all those things, had been most com- mendable in them ; but their quick forsaking of those things when they were where they would be, showed that they either never took them up for conscience or were corrupted by their prosperity to take up those vain things which they durst not practice under persecu- tion. Among other affected habits, few of the Puritans, what degree soever they were of, wore their hair long enough to cover their ears and the ministers and many others cut it close round their heads, with so many little peaks, as was something ridiculous to behold ; where- upon Cleveland, in his hue and cry after them, begins— 10 HULLINIA. 1 with hair in character and luggs in text/ &c. ; from this custom of wearing their hair, that name of 'Roundhead' became the scornful term given to the whole Parlia- ment party, whose army, indeed, marched out so ; but as if they had been sent out only until their hair was grown ; two or three years after, any stranger that had seen them would have inquired the reason of that name. The Godly party of those days — when he, (Mr. Hutchin- son,) joined them, would not allow him to be religious because his hair was not in their cut, nor his words in their phrase ; nor such little formalities altogether fitted to their humour, who were many of them so weak as to esteem men rather for such insignificant circum- stances than for solid piety, wisdom and courage." On both sides we see many things worthy of admiration — on the one hand, a brave and intelligent people were about to take the field in the cause of liberty ; and on the other, a generous nobility, supported by the great body of the minor Barons of the kingdom, present themselves in the attitude of defending their Sovereign against the fury of democratical ambition, which threatened and ultimately succeeded in treading the Crown and sceptre in the dust, and soon- the most virtuous nation in Europe was plunged into the miseries of a civil war. The war of the Pen, in all the large towns, preceded, the war of the Sword. Letters were written by the Parliament to most of the Corporations, and one of them came to Hull. A second alarm was given by more letters being written to the same purport, namely, that they were about to be invaded. The Corporation appointed 24 of the chief residents to sit from time to time, with the Mayor and Aldermen, to assist them with their counsel for the peace and safety of the town. Historians say that, had Charles made himself master of Hull, he would in all probability have subdued the Parliament. A message was forwarded to the Lords by the Commons, stating that 4t there was a magazine with HULLINIA. I I arms and ammunition for 16,000 men in Hull, that the town was weakly garrisoned, and that the adjacent county was full of disaffected persons. They desired that some of the trained bands of Yorkshire should be put into Hull under Sir John Hotham, with orders not to deliver up the town or magazine without the King's authority signified by both Houses!' To this message the Lords consented. Young Hotham was sent im- mediately to Hull to execute this order, until his father could be ready to take the government upon himself. Sir John followed a few weeks after his son. When the Governor elect arrived before the town, he sent a trumpeter and demanded admittance for himself and his forces, which numbered 800 of the militia. The Mayor ordered the bridges to be drawn up — shut the gates — charged the cannon — and summoned the inhabitants to his assistance. The Mayor in answer to Sir John's application answered, " that he was resolved to be true to his trust, and that, if Sir John did not move further off, he would be treated as an enemy " ; whereupon he retired and dispatched an express to Parliament, and on its being read to the House, an order was speedily made to receive Sir John, and resign the government to him, or they should be deemed guilty of treason. On receipt of this message, a Hall was summoned, when it was re- solved to obey the order; accordingly, Sir John Hotham and his forces were admitted without further delay. Thus was Hull lost to Charles, it being the first town the Parliament had secured, with the first forces which were openly employed against the stronghold uf the kingdom. The town v s of such import .nee then, that it gave a great superic i v to that part) 7 into whose hands it should first fall. So^.i after, the Kino- wrote to the Corporation desiring them to receive the Earl of Newcastle, as Governor, to keep it in their own hands, and under the government of the Mayor, as usual. As will be seen, it was too late. More troops were for- warded, and all communications with the Royalists were entirely cut off. 12 HULLINIA. On the 2 2nd of April, 1642, the King, who was at York, sent the Duke of York, his second son, (after- wards James the 2nd,) to Hull, w r ith the young elector Palatine, Lords Newport and Willoughby, Sir Thomas Glenham, and others. They entered the town on market-day with the country people, unknown to the magistrates ; but on making themselves known, they were entertained by the Mayor, in company with the Governor, and the next day they dined with Sir John Hotham. The King on that morning set out from York, and rode on towards Hull with a train of 300 persons. Just before the Governor sat down to dinner, the entertainment was interrupted by the arrival of Sir Lewis Dives, who was the bearer of a message to the Governor, which was brief and in the following words : " That His Majesty designed to dine with him that day." Sir Lewis also notified to the select company assembled that the King was only four miles off. Sir John became so startled with the news that he im- mediately left the table, went into his private room, and sent for Alderman Pelham, who had been elected a Member of Parliament for Hull, in the room of Sir John Lister (deceased). The interview resulted in the determination that the King should not be admitted, and accordingly, a messenger was sent to His Majesty, "humbly beseeching him to forbear coming, forasmuch as Sir John could not, without betraying the trust com- mitted to him, set open the gates to so great a company as he came attended withal." The King was shocked at this message ; nevertheless he proceeded on his road to the town. He forwarded a messenger with the news of his approach, upon which, Sir John Hotham ordered the bridges to be drawn up. and the gates to be shut ; the guns were loaded, the soldiers drawn out and stood to their arms behind the walls ; the inhabitants were confined to their houses until sunset, and all persons were forbidden, on pain of death, to go out into the streets By these precautions the Parliamentary party HULUNIA. 13 entirely defeated the supposed projects of the Duke of York, who was doubtless sent to incite rebellion among the inhabitants, in case his father was denied entrance. About eleven o'clock, King Charles appeared at Beverley gate, and seeing the bridge drawn up and the hostile appearance which the walls exhibited, he summoned Sir John, and on his appearance, demanded admittance. The answer of Hotham — and indeed the whole conference — is slightly varied by historians, therefore, I will give the several words put into his mouth by those who have related this extraordinary historical interview between a King of England de- manding entrance to our town, and a Governor denying him admission, under the singular pretence of a great regard for the honour of his Sovereign, against whom at the time he was in actual rebellion. But before so doing, it would be as well, at this par- ticular juncture, to describe briefly the frowning fortifi- cations that surrounded the town at the time we are alluding to. We are all familiar with the various ancient plans of Hull; and if there are any who are not, they will find them all collected in one volume, in the last edition of Mr. Sheahan's " History of Hull ; " but in the plan of Hull, A.D. 1640, we get a capital view of the town as it appeared at the very period I am describing— namely, just before the civil war. Every building is distinctly and accurately delineated, including the Churches, the Magazine, Castle and Block-houses. There was a wide and deep moat in front of the walls, on the north and west sides of the town, which was connected with the rivers Hull and H umber ; so that the town was surrounded by water as at present. The entrances to the town at that time were by five massive gateways, namely: — Hessle, Myton, Beverley, Low, and North Gates, and two Sally-ports. The distances from each gate were nearly equal. The whole fortified walls were 2,610 yards in circuit, or a few yards less 14 liTUJMA, than a mile-and-a-half. In front of the principal gates were drawbridges, and half moon-shaped batteries were thrown up before them, during the civil war which soon followed the siege of Hull. Hessle Gate stood at the west end of H umber-street, and consisted of a tower with gate- way and barbican ; My ton Gate was at the end of the street bearing that name ; Beverley Gate — where we left Charles — was at the end of Whitefriargate, surmounted by a tower and spire ; the Low Gate was at the end of that thoroughfare, and a little to the westward was a half-moon battery; and the North Gate was at the end of High-street, close to the Dock Office. One of the Sally-ports, or Posterns, was at the end of Posterngate. The fortifications were continued from Hessle Gate to the South-end, near the Watch-house. At that time there were neither Wellington nor Nelson-Streets ; the foreshore being in H umber-Street. One of the towers, which would be situated near the site of the Theatre Royal, was known as the " Cold and Uncud," or uncouth, and was used as a prison. We will now cross over the North-bridge and ex- amine the east side of the town. The first object worthy of notice, was the North Block-house. King- Henry VIII, when visiting Hull in 1540, found -that portion of the town defenceless, and accordingly ordered two Block-houses to be built, and a Castle to be erected, with a strict injunction that they should be made 44 mighty strong." The walls were immensely thick, and all must have a vivid recollection of how great a difficuly it was to demolish them when the Garrison was dismantled. Six hundred yards from the Block- house stood the Castle ; and about four hundred yards further was the South Block-house. The whole three were joined by a strong wall — there being no Citadel until 1681, when Charles II. constructed the Garrison. Want of space will net permit of my describing the interior of the Castle and Block-houses ; but all HULLINIA, [5 must agree that before the walls began to decay — through more peaceful times following after the reign of the Second Charles — Hull, with its high raised battlements, — thick walls, with " spire and turret crowned/' was a prize worth struggling for between the Crown and the Parliament ; and however we may smile at old historians when they described it as being the " Royal and beautiful town of Kingston- upon-Hull," it must have been most imposing, compared with what it is in our present peaceful times. And now, having given a description of the town's appearance in 1642, we will return to Beverley Gate, where we left the King, attended by ki starred and spangled" Cavaliers. For a moment they all seem to live again ; we stand on the battlements — we seem to witness the colloquy ; the fortalice and the ramparts ring with the clang and din of arms. Outside the gate was the comely pre- sence of the King, with " his usual melancholy aspect." It is said, " his face was regular, handsome, and well- complexioned," — he excelled in horsemanship,' and was surrounded by 300 noble and chivalrous followers, the turf heaving beneath the feet of their horses. Among those present, on a beautiful charger, was Bertie, Duke of Ancaster and Earl of Lindsey, who was subsequently mortally wounded at the battle of Edgehill ; the Mar- quis of Northampton, who was afterwards sent to the relief of Stafford, and, having accomplished that object, engaged, with 1,000 men, more than 2,000 of the enemy in the battle of Hopton Heath, March ig, 1644, and was killed; the Earl of Derby who dis- tinguished himself by his loyal attachment to King- Charles, and who, in the county of Lancaster, August 26, 165 1, with 600 horse, maintained a fight against 2,000 horse and foot of the enemy, but was sub- sequently taken prisoner at the battle of Winchester, September 3, 165 1, and beheaded at Bolton, October 15, in the same year; Thomas, Lord Arundel, who was killed in the battle of Lansdown, July 5, 1643 ; the Earl l6 HULLINIAi of Montrose, who was executed May 21, 1650; the Duke of Kingston, who was afterwards killed in an open boat on the river Trent, being at the time a prisoner, on his way to Hull ; Prince Rupert ; the Earl of Wor- cester ; the Marquis of Winchester ; Earl of Chester- field ; Earl of Lichfield ; Lord Wentworth (afterwards created Earl of Cleveland) ; and Viscount Fauconberg, who was the Commander-in-Chief at the battle of Selby. No wonder that when Sir John Hotham came face to face with the King, he betrayed the utmost confusion and irresolution. The King demanded admittance. Sir John, evidently much embarassed, and with distracted looks, spoke confusedly. It is said he was very haughty to his inferiors, and was not endowed with a presence of mind which enables men to act on any sudden emergency. He was master of a fine landed estate, very rich, of an ancient family, and well allied. He was a man of peace, and it is thought that his refusal to admit the King might be the means of preventing a rupture between the Crown and people. When the King demanded admission, Sir John said " he durst not open the gate, being entrusted by the Parliament," to which the King replied, %i he believed he had no order to act in that manner/' Hotham rejoined, " that the King's train was so great, that if it were admitted, he should not be able to give an account of the town ; " whereupon the King offered to enter with twenty horsemen only. Sir John again re- fused. The King then desired Sir John to come out to him, so that he might hold a conference with him, and gave his royal word for his safe return. Sir John begged to be excused. Charles then became indignant, and told him " that as this action was altogether un- paralleled, so it would produce some notable effect ; that it was not possible for him to sit down with such an indignity, but that he would proclaim him a traitor, and proceed against him as such; that his disobedience HULLINIA. 17 would probably bring many miseries on the kingdom, and loss of much blood, all of which might be prevented if he performed the duty of a subject, and therefore advised him to think sadly of it, and to prevent the necessary growth of so many calamities, which must lie all upon his conscience." Sir John, with distracted looks, conversed very confusedly of the trust he had from Parliament, and falling on his knees, wished " That God would bring confusion upon him and his, if he was not a loyal and faithful subject to his majesty, but in conclusion he declined to suffer his majesty to come into the town." The King then called for the Mayor, Mr. Thomas Raikes, and demanded admission from him. The Mayor also fell on his knees, began shedding tears and answered " That he could do no more, protesting he would let him in if it was in his power, but that he could not do it, there being a guard over him, the inhabitants, and the gates, which were held by the soldiers ready armed, with orders to put any one to death, who should attempt to open them." About one o'clock a private consultation took place between Sir John Hotham and the officers, with the Duke of York and party who was inside the town, which ended in their being allowed to go out to the King, w T ith whom they had a long conference. At five o'clock in the evening" the Kino- again commanded the Governor to open the gates, giving him one hour to consider of it. Sir John still persisted in his refusal. Charles then and there proclaimed him a traitor, by two heralds, commanding the Corporation to reject his jurisdiction as the Governor ; and, drawing close up to the walls, ordered the soldiers to throw the traitor over into the moat. No notice was taken, and Sir John losing his temper at these remarks, used some expressions of disloyalty and contempt. The King then withdrew and went to Beverley ; but the next day he sent a herald to Hull to summon him for the last time to open the gates, with offer of pardon for all the B ?8 HULLINIA. past disloyalty. It was of no avail, and Charles therefore returned to York. Now, it seems very strange that the King should not have provided himself with materials of war to accomplish his object of taking Hull, because it was well known when he left London that that was his in- tention. It seems he flattered himself that he had no more to do than to appear at the gates of Hull, and that ■'" if he knocked it would be opened unto him." H'e •may have forgotten that the town was in the hands of ' persons who had become disaffected, through his en- deavour to trample on the laws, and by his refusing to make timely constitutional concessions, they had lost reverence for royal dignity. Sir John Hotham was bound to carry out the order of Parliament-, he himself being a member of the House of Commons ; and they had chosen him for the government of Hull because they believed he w r ould be true to his trust. This re- fusal to admit the King into Hull seriously damaged the little remaining prestige he possessed. In vain * Charles tried to varnish this rebuff by saying he had no other design than to visit Hull and examine the * magazine. Discomfited in his views, and highly in- dignant at the insult he had received, he thereupon -accused Sir John Hotham of high treason, and de- ■ manded of Parliament reparation for the affront. r This gave rise to innumerable messages, declarations, answers and replies. I can only simply mention the * purport of them : — The King cited the laws which com- mitted to him the care and command of the forts and : magazines, and he urged that they were his own pro- perty — particularly those of Hull — being purchased with his own cash, and which could not be witfiheM from him, without treating him worse than the lowest of his subjects. Parliament replied that they were intrusted to the care of the sovereign simply as a de- posit for their preservation, and not to be used for the destruction of the people ; therefore his claim was HULLINIA. 19 groundless. Ultimately, Parliament vindicated Sir John Hotham's conduct at Beverley Gate, by passing a resolution which was sent to Hull by express — " That no forces should be admitted into Hull without the immediate consent of both Houses/' In the meantime, the nobility of the North ex- pressed a high sense of their affection for the King, and offered to raise a force in the county to take Hull by an assault. The King in the meantime sent an- other message to Parliament, stating " That he was so much concerned in the undutiful affront which he had received from Sir John Hotham, before the Gates of Hull, that he was impatient till he received justice from them/' The Parliament again avowed their approval of Sir John's transactions. Charles thereupon published a declaration respecting Hull, commencing by saying, that " Since our two gracious messages concerning Hull — to both Houses of Parliament — demanding justice for the high and unheard of affront, offered unto us at the Gates of Hull by Sir John Hotham, is not thought worthy of an answer, but in- stead thereof, they have thought fit, by their printed votes of the 28th of April last, to own and avow that unparalleled act of Sir John Hotham's, to be done in obedience to the command of both Houses of Parlia- ment — by the defence of such proceedings, all private interest and title of our gfood subjects to their lands and goods are confounded and destroyed. And this we are sure is our case at Hull, and as it is ours to-day, by the same rule, it may be theirs to-morrow." Charles concluded this proclamation by quoting Pym's own words :-— " If the prerogatives of the King over- whelm the liberty of the people, it will be turned to tyranny ; if liberty undermine the prerogative, it will turn into anarchy and confusion." The following is a copy of a letter of Henrietta Marias, Queen of Charles the First, written soon after the unfortunate attempt upon Hull, in April 1642, 20 HULLIXIA. translated from the French. The original is in the British Museum without date. It is rare, and since I have not found it in any of our local histories, and as it relates to the subject I will quote it here. It is copied from " Seward's Anecdotes of Distinguished Persons," Vol. L, page 225 : — - " As I was closing my letter Sir. L. Dives arrived, who has told me " all that passed at Hull. Do not lose courage, and pursue the business " with resolution, for you must now show that you will make good " what you have undertaken. If the man who is in the place will not " submit, you have already declared him a Traitor; you must have him " alive or dead, for matters now begin to be very serious. You must " declare yourself ; you have shewn gentleness enough, you must now u show your firmness. You see what has happened from not having ''followed your fiist resolution, when you declared the five members " traitors ; let that serve you for an example ; dalty no longer with " consultations, but proceed to action. I heartily wished myself in the " place of my son James, in Hull ; I should have thrown that scoundrel " Hotham over the walls, or he should have thrown me. I am in such ''haste to dispatch this bearer, that I can write to nobody else. Go " boldly to work, as I see there is no hope of accommodation," &c, &c. Subsequently the King made another attempt to secure Hull. There were onlv two methods left to become master of it — either by surprise or force. The latter was quite impracticable, having no artillery, arms, or ammunition. There was at that time a Mr. Beck- with living at Beverley, who had a son-in-law an officer in Hull, whom the King sent thither; but this plot failed, for the officer informed Sir John what his father- in-law requested. The Governor sent word to the King, " that he might save himself the trouble of carry- ing on the contrivance/' and Beckwith therefore re- turned to the King - . A messenger was sent from Parliament to seize him and bring him to London, but the King would not permit it. His Majesty, suffering severely from disappoint- ment, summoned the gentry of Yorkshire to appear on the 1 2th of May, 1642, on which clay, in a speech, he recounted to them the treason of Sir John Hotham, countenanced by the Parliament ; that he had reason to apprehend danger, and requested a guard for his person, and also desired their assistance. After some discussion the guard *'as raised, consisting of a troop HULUXIA. 2 1 of horse and a regiment of foot and the command was given to the Prince of Wales, afterwards Charles II. In the meantime the Queen, who was still in Holland, purchased arms and ammunition — having pledged the crown jewels for that purpose — and embarked them in the ship Providence. The cargo consisted of 200 barrels of powder, 3000 stand of arms, and 8 field- pieces. Notification was sent to the Admiral of the fleet in the Downs ; three ships were sent in search of the vessel ; they got sight of her near the coast and gave chase until she entered the Humber, intending to drive her into this port. Captain Strangham, of the Providence, ran her ashore in Kenningham Creek ; the pursuing ships drew too much water to follow, and the stores were all safely landed. Now the King resolved to have his revenge on Hull, and this was the first scene of action, which was soon followed by others in various parts of the king- dom. He summoned the train-bands to attend him at Beverley, whither he removed his court, bringing with him 3,000 foot and 1000 horsemen. A proclamation was issued throughout the whole county, that no one on pain of death should convey necessaries into the town ; 200 men were set to work in cutting trenches to turn the fresh water into the Humber ; and 200 horse- men were detached into Lincolnshire, to stop all pro- visions being brought in on that side. Two forts were ordered to be erected, one at Hessle Cliff, the other at Paull, and the Humber to be guarded ; so that a com- plete blocade of the town was now established. While these operations were going on outside, Sir John Hotham was not looking- on idle. He was making every precaution within. The walls were fortified, the out.vork repaired, the ancient Charter House was blown up, all the houses situated in Myton, outside the town, were knocked down for fear the royalists should turn them into batteries, and every expedient prepared for defending Hull, 2 2 HULLINIA. Sir John began to get alarmed when he heard that His Majesty intended to march up with his whole army to the walls of the town. 1 le therefore dispatched three messengers, one after the other, imploring the King to desist from his purpose, not to turn his army against the town, for that it was his, and all therein his loyal and affectionate subjects. But Charles turned a deaf ear ; he would no longer be tampered with ; the messengers were detained as prisoners. Sir John then called a council of war ; they determined to pull up the sluices — the banks of the Hull and the Humber were cut on both sides, and the land laid under water — the whole country was inundated and the damage done to the neighbouring villages w T as incredible ; all the forage was swept away in this artificial inundation. In the morning Sir John sent to Parliament particulars of what he had done, desiring them to send him 500 men with provisions, stating that " though the highways were all flooded and impassable, yet the enemy could come to Hull on the banks of the Humber, Hull, or Derringham, where they could either make an assault or cannonade." The Parliament then raised 2000 men whom they dispatched to Hull by sea. They also sent a declaration into the East Riding of York- shire, promising compensation for the damage done and condemning the proceedings of the King. On the 10th of July, a vessel with recruits ran up the Humber, passed the fort at Paull safely, and landed in the harbour, to the great joy of the inhabitants. At this time firing was heard at a distance. It seems a Parliament man-of-war while scouring the Humber, had met with a large ship against Paull jetty, laden with cannon and ammunition, and on her refusing to strike, an engagement ensued, until she went to the bottom. The Royalists, who had planted some guns before the walls, now began to play into Hull, and were answered by the cannon upon the fortifications. Sir JIULLIXIA. 23 John was busy animating and inflaming the minds of the Parliamentarians, and circulating the report that it was intended to fire the town and put all the inhabit- ants to the sword, without respect to age, condition, or sex. The people were aroused— they became des- perate ; they made several sallies from the town, and many Royalists were destroyed. An engagement took place between the towns-people and Royalists at Ahlaby, which, after a vigorous resistance, the Royal- ists were forced to evacuate. A magazine in a large barn belonging to Wm. Legard was blown up and the village plundered. The Royalists were commanded by the Earl of Newport, who was taken off his horse by a 'Cannon ball and thrown into a ditch, where he was discovered insensible. ; King Charles addressed the neighbouring country in several strong remonstrances, all trying to exculpate himself. He bitterly inveighed against Sir John Hotham, complaining of the indignity with which he had refused him entrance into Hull. And now having described what was going on outside the walls of the beleaguered town, let us take a look inside and see what was being done there. ' But I must first digress a little to give some corro-: borative evidence of what I have stated concerning the trial of Charles the First. I find that the first witness examined was one Wm. Cuthbert, of Patrington, Holderness. He said, "that in July 1642, he lived at Hull Bridge, near Beverley. He did then hear that forces were raised for the Kings guard, under Sir Robert Strickland, and that about the 2nd of July 1642, he saw a troop of- horse come to Beverley, about Four or Five o'clock in the afternoon, called the Prince's Troop, Mr. J. Nelthorp being the Major, and that he saw, that afternoon, the said troop march from Beverley into Holderness, where they received ammunition brought up by the river Humber ; and the same night, there came about 300 foot soldiers under the command 24 HULLINIA. of Lieut. Col. Duncombe, called the Kings Guard, unto the deponent's house, called Hull Bridge, about midnight, and broke open and possessed themselves of the said house, and that the Earl of Newport, the Earl of Carnarvon, and divers others, came that night thither, and that Sir Thos. Gower, then High Sheriff of the County, came thither and left a warrant for stay- ing all provisions from going to Hull to Sir John Hotham, that he was by the said forces put out of his house, and did with his family go to Beverley ; and on the Thursday following, he did see the King come to Beverley to the Lady Gee's House, where he did often see the King with Prince Charles and the Duke of York, and that the night after the said forces had possessed themselves of deponent's house, Colonel Legard's house was plundered by them. This was the first act of hostility that was committed in these parts, and the deponent produceth the original warrant, and is as followeth : — ' It is his Majesty's command that you do not suffer any victuals or provisions, of what sort soever, to be carried into the Town of Hull, without his Majesty's special license first obtained. And of this you are not to fail at your peril. Dated at Bever- ley, July 3rd, 1642/ " The evidence was directed at the single point of the military movements personally superintended and car- ried on by the King against the Parliamentary forces, and the bloodshed thereby occasioned. The first witness being from this part of the country, I thought, might prove interesting. We will now resume our narrative. The King possessed a great confidant in the emi- nent George, Lord Digby, by whose advice he had been induced to do things which had materially tended to widen the breach between him and the Parliament. Lord Digby had been accused by the latter of high treason. He escaped to Holland, but, hearing of the King's critical condition in Yorkshire, he disguised himself, came over and conferred with the King in Lord Digby. (From an Original Portrait.) HULLINIA. 25 secret. He stayed only one night, and re-embarked next morning in the same vessel that brought him to England. They had not been many hours at sea before they fell in with the Providence ship-of-war, coming to Hull with stores, to which I have already alluded, but just then the ship belonging to Parliament came up to them, and the vessel containing Digby was taken and brought into Hull. Digby being in disguise none knew him. He pretended to be a Frenchmen, being able to speak the French language very fluently. During the return he pretended to be very sea-sick and kept in the hold of the vessel. There he de- stroyed his papers, and, feigning illness so cleverly, on his landing he was sent under a guard to a place of repose. Lord Digby knew his dangerous position. He began to ruminate how he was to escape from his enemies, knowing he would not be much longer able to conceal himself. He was also aware that he was the worst hated man in the kingdom ; consequently his life was in imminent danger. He had another difficulty to overcome in the enmity that Sir John entertained towards him. But Lord Digby was a man of great ability, and did not altogether despair. At last he ventured to tell one of the guards in broken English that he desired to speak privately with the Governor, and could disclose some state secrets. The man went to Sir John and acquainted him with what he had stated. Lord Digby was brought before Sir John who was proficient in French. There was a yery large company present. Digby made several statements, and, after a sifting examination, requested to have a private interview with the Governor. Sir John was rather nervous, because he knew that the Commons had not much confidence in him, and even his son, Captain Hotham, which is rather remarkable, was set as a spy over him. Therefore Hotham re- fused to trust himself in private. However, he drew 26 HULLINIA* aside to a large window and told Digby to say what he pleased ; Digby finding himself foiled in not obtain- ing a. private audience, asked Sir John, in English, if he knew him. Sir John answered with astonishment that he did not. "Then," says he, " I will try whether I know Sir John Hotham, and whether he be the man of honour I have taken him to be," and thereupon told him who he was, adding that " he hoped he was too much of a gentleman to deliver him up a sacrifice to the vengeance of those whom, he new, were his impla- cable enemies." Sir John was filled with the utmost amazement at this discovery, and being apprehensive that the persons present would discover him, he told Digby "not to say one word more for the present; that he should not regret or be sorry for the trust he had reposed in him ; that he should find him the same man he had thought him ; that he would take an op- portunity as soon as he conveniently could, to have further conversation with him ; in the meantime, that it would be necessary he should take up with the ac- commodation he had for a time, as any amendment thereof might create suspicion ; that Lord Digby would find that he was not what he seemed." Thereupon the guard was ordered to remove the prisoner away and keep strict watch over him. On his rejoining the com- pany, Sir John told them that "the Frenchman was a shrewd fellow," and hoped in a few days to inform Parliament of much clear information. Shortly after- wards he made an excuse and departed to his chamber much dejected. This serious breach of confidence was the first step towards Hotham's downfall. Here he had in his clutches the nobleman who had advised the King to impeach five members of the House of Commons; Digby himself had been impeached of high treason, and had to fly his country. A nobleman odious to the whole nation — a prisoner in the enemy's garrison, he was at the mercy of a man supposed to be devoted to HULLINIA. 2 7 the Commons, and his particular enemy. But Digby flattered Sir John's vanity, and was, doubtless, the cause of his forgetting at the moment his important trust. The next day the Governor sent again for Digby at an hour when he would not be noticed, and told him " That since he had frankly put himself in his hands, he would not betray him, and desired to know by what means he should set him at liberty ; that he would not trust any one with the secret, and least of all his own son," against whom, singular to say, he inveighed with great bitterness ; u that the parliament reposed more confidence in his son than himself, and he was only sent there to be a spy upon his father." He then la- mented his own fate, " that he was not an extreme man, but well-affected to the King; that he should now be looked upon as the chief cause of the civil war, which was likely to ensue, by refusing the King entrance into Hull ; " and concluded by stating " he had received in- formation of the King's purpose to hang him ! That was the true cause of his acting in the manner he did." Lord Digby taking advantage of his confession, and having secured his own safety, began to tamper with the Governor on behalf of his royal master, who at the time was carrying on military operations outside the town. Digby laid siege against Sir John, and commenced by planting the artillery of artfulness ; and, by his insinuating address, tried to tamper with the in- tegrity of the Governor. He began by bewailing the calamity with which the nation was threatened, and pathetically lamented that a few bad men should be able to involve him, Sir John, and then followed with the alarming statement, " That the King in a short time would reduce all his enemies ; that his son-in-law, the Prince of Orange, was coming over at the head of a large army, and would take Hull in three days." The poor Governor became fearfully terrified. Of course there was no truth in this statement; but it will 2$. BPLUKIA. be perceived what impression this subtle address made on Hotham. He now began to cajole Sir John, by adding " That any person who could be the means of preventing such terrible confusion as now threatened the Kingdom, both the. King and people would join in rewarding such a good work with preferments ; that his name would be transmitted to posterity as the pre- server of his country." Having enlarged on this subject, on seeing Sir John silent, he made an imme- diate application, telling him, as Nathan said unto David -" Thou art the man," and " that by delivering up Hull to the King, he might extinguish the war." I need hardly add after several conversations and re- flections, Hotham gave way to the false promises held out to. him by Digby. All things were adjusted. Hotham's agreement being, in his own w r ords, " It would not become him, after such a defiance as he had given, to surrender Hull into the Kings hands, nor could he undertake to effect it, if he was willing so to do ; the town itself was not well-disposed to the Kings service; but that if the King would come before the town though with but a single regiment, plant his cannon against it, and make but one shot, he should think he had discharged his trust to the Parliament, so far as lie ought to do, and that he would then immediately deliver up the town, which he made no doubt he should be able to do, and on this errand he was willing Lord Digby should go to York and have a safe conduct out of Hull beyond any danger." Sir John kept his word, informing his officers of his intention to send the " supposed Frenchman to York, who, he was well assured, would return to Hull again." He gave Digby a note to a widow who lived in that city, at whose house he might lodge, and through whose hands he might send him any letters to Hull. Digby soon found himself at liberty and set out for York. Having had a private interview with the King, he returned again in his former disguise, keeping faith in his engagements with the Governor. HULLINIA. 2'g Immediately Digby left York, the King began his march with merely two or three regiments and a small train of artillery. The people were startled at Charles being so ill provided for such an undertaking. No one being in the secret respecting the arrangement that had been made between Digby and the Governor, except the King. Lord Lindsey was ordered to send forward some officers to reconnoitre the town, and to fix on some advantageous place where he might erect a bat- tery. He expressed his annoyance at being appointed to that post withont an army. He believed he was engaged in an enterprise which could not possibly succeed. Although Lindsey did not think that the trained bands belonging to the town would expose themselves to such an attack, he took a survey of the town by riding up to the gates and along the whole length of the walls. At first there was no show of hostility from the town. But in a day or two they observed the walls well manned, and presently they were fired upon. In the meantime, Hotham was busy sounding some of the officers in whom he had most confidence in order to see if he could rely on their obedience ; but much to his disappointment he found them opposed to his purpose. It soon got bruited abroad of Sir John's intention, and he was suspected. His son was the first to be suspicious of him, and it seems, de- nounced all those who were disaffected to the govern- ment. Sir John became much disheartened, and Digby on his return was disappointed to find the Governor not so earnest in the Royal cause as when he left him. New officers and men were sent down to Hull by sea, from Boston, by order of Parliament. Sir John now began to repent of what he had done. Digby sent word to the King, informing his majesty of the change, but was not without hopes of restoring the Governors former ardour ; on which the King deferred any actual attempt on Hull, 30 HULLINIA. Subsequently Sir John relinquished his design of giving up Hull to the King, and dismissed Digby, repeating his professions of duty and loyalty to the King. There cannot be a doubt that the capture, con- cealment, and release of Digby and Col. Ashburnham, two such eminent royalists, increased the jealousy of the Parliament, and was the principal cause of his ultimately loosing his head. The King, much disappointed at this miscarriage, returned to York. He was charged with weakness by his court, and submitted to different imputations rather than divulge what he thought the treachery of Hotham, which had instigated him to this fruitless expedition against the town of Hull. Soon after the blockade was given up, (and that would be about- the end of July, 1642,) Capt. Hotham was detached by his father with a strong party to ravage the country and harrass the royalists. He at last was met on the wolds by Sir Thomas Glenham, who defeated him and cut off most of his detachments. Capt. Hotham then retreated to Hull. The war was by this time becoming general. Orders arrived com- manding Governor Hotham to sally out of the town and harass the royalists as much as possible ; in pur- suance of which, the two Hothams made terrible devastations in Yorkshire, burning, plundering, and destroying all before them. Though the royalists had been foiled in every attempt on Hull by arms or negotiation, a circumstance arose at this time which gave them some hope of better success, and again they set to work to corrupt Sir John. Parliament finding it necessary to have a com- mander-in-chief in the North, sent a commission to Lord Fairfax to command all their forces in York- shire. The appointment of Fairfax to the lieutenancy of the North gave umbrage to both Sir John and his son. They took resentment against the Parliament, and strengthened their respect for Charles. Sir John HULLINIA. 3 1 was much annoyed, considering the eminent services he had rendered the Parliamentarians in retaining Hull for them, and having run the risk of the King's resent- ment. It was no wonder that the Governor became disgusted at Fairfax being elevated to that high posi- tion. Although the King was much exasperated with Hotham's conduct towards him before the gates of Hull, a coalition was brought about through the cir- cumstances just mentioned. A treaty was again set on foot to deliver up Hull to Charles through Sir John's resentment and thirst for revenge. Very singularly, at the sanie time, Captain Hotham turned stubborn and would not receive orders from Lord Fairfax. He became involved in his fathers feelings and adopted all his sentiments of dis- gust to the Parliament, and at least apparently showed affection for the King. Sir John put himself in com- munication with the Earl of Newcastle. Many letters secretly passed on both sides ; the Earl representing on tlie part of" the King how seriously he - had been injured by the denial Sir John had given him when he demanded entrance into Hull, and that the miseries of a civil war were to be attributed to that circumstance ; still it was in Sir John's power to quench the flames then raging in the Kingdom ; he might render the King and the nation happy; he might obtain his own par- don ; he would by delivering up the town aggrandize himself, so as to become one of the first men of the nation. In the month of February, 1643, the Queen ar- rived at Burlington Quay with troops. The second day, her landing became known to the Parliament Admiral of the fleet, who, finding she lodged on the Quay, brought his ships near. Early in the morning he discharged an immense quanity of bar shot, for the space of four hours, on the house where she was. Some of them passed through her chamber, obliged her to rise from her bed and take shelter behind a bank m the open f*eld. 32 HULLINIA. In confirmation of what I have written, Her Majesty shall speak for herself in the following copy of an original Letter : — ■ " BuiiLiNGTON, this 15-25 February, 1G43. My Dear Heart, " As soon as 1 landed in England I sent Progers to " you, but having learnt to-day that he was taken by the enemy, I send " you again this man to give you an account of my arrival. Thanks to " God ; for just as stormy as the sea was the first time I set sail, just so " calamitous was it this time until within 15 hours of Newcastle; and " on the coast when the wind changed to the North- west, which forced " us to make for Burlington Bay, and after two hours waiting at sea " your cavalry arrived, and I landed instantly, and the next day tho . ." rest of the army came to join me. " God who took care of me at sea, was pleased to continue his pro- * ; " tection by land ; for that night four of the Parliament ships arrived at " Burlington without our knowledge, and in the morning, about four " o'clock, the alarm was given that we should send down to the harbour "to secure our ammunition boats, which had not been able to be un- . , •" loaded; but about an hour after, these four ships began to fire so " briskly that we were obliged to rise in haste, and leave the village to "them— at least the women, for the soldiers resolutely to defend the >.' ammunition. In case of descent I must act the Captain, though a "little low in stature myself. "One of these ships had done me the favour to flank my house, " which fronted the pier, and before I could get out of bed, the balls " were whistling about in such style that you may easily believe I loved " not such music. Everybody came to force me to go out, tho balls "beating so on all tho houses, that dressed just as it happened, I went " on foot to some distance from the village to the shelter of a ditch, like " those at New Market ; but before we could reach it the balls wero " singing round us in fine style, and a sergeant was killed twenty paces ** from me. "We placed ourselves then under shelter, during two hours " that they were firing upon us, and the balls passing always over our "heads, and sometimes covering us with dust. At last the Admiral of " Holland sent to tell them that if they did not cease, he would fire upon "them as enemies. This was done a little late, but he excuses himself " on account of a fog which he says there wa3. On this they stopped "and the tide went down so that there was not water enough for them " to ttay where they were. " As soon as they were retired, I ventured to my house, and choos- "ing tbat they should have the vanity to say that they had made me " quit the village. At noon I set out again to come to the town of " Burlington, as I had previously resolved. All to-day, they have un- " loaded our ammunition in face of the enemy. "I am told that one of the Captains of tho Parliament ships had " been beforehand to reconoitre where my lodging was. as I assuro you " it was well marked, for they always shot upon it. I may truly say " that by sea and by land, I have been in some danger, but God by his " favour has saved me, and I have such confidence in His goodness as to " believe that He will not leave mo in other things, since in this lie has " protected mo ; and I protest to you, that in His confidence, I should " dare go to the very cannon's mouth, only that we should not tempt 44 Him. Tbw Uwcr is wilncw of all that has passed; nevcithelcee I Henrietta. Queen or Charles I. (Fram a scarce and- orig-inallbrtraib.) HULLINIA. 33 11 would not refrain from giving you a relation. It is very exact, and * after this, I am going to eat a little, having taken nothing to-day but u three eggs, and slept very little. u Adieu, my dear heart. " As soon as I have arrived at York I will send to you to ascertain " how I can come and join you ; but I beg you not to take any resolu- u tion until you have tidings from me." Gent's. Mag. Vol. xliv. p. 363 and the Queen's proceedings in York- shire to London in 1643. Sir John hearing of the Queen's arrival, sent his son to her in order to treat with her for the surrender of the town, and to know what terms they could obtain. Captain Hotham having been admitted into her presence, kissed her hand, and afterwards had a private interview with the Earl of Newcastle, during which they settled the matter to the mutual satisfac- tion of both parties. The Queen soon after sent the Lady Bland to Hull, to confer with Sir John, who assented to everything she advanced, signed the terms, and gave her letters to her Majesty. The Queen's emissary returned to her Majesty at York on the 6th of June. She sent Lord Digby again to Hull with letters to Sir John. Digby pointed out to Sir John his particular and personal danger, producing . intercepted letters of Fairfax, wherein was shewn a plan for Sir John's destruction. Sir John after reading them swore he would be revenged, and then and there entered into a treaty to deliver up the town on the 28th of August following. But Parliament was made cognizant of these proceedings, and in order to ascertain the nature of the designs hatching in Hull, they employed a Mr, Saltmarsh, cousin of the Governor. Saltmarsh wheed- led out the whole plot ; at the same time swearing by his salvation to further the attempt, and never to reveal it. Being now master of every particular, he dispatched a messenger to the Parliament, which re- warded him with ,£2,000. The Queen was now at Newark, and wrote to the King, saying "that she stayed there only until she had secured Hull" The Governor was entirely ignorant ;34 -HULLINIA. of the treachery of his cousin, and was soon trapped by Parliament. He received an order to send his son with troops to Nottingham, to join Oliver Cromwell, then only a Colonel. Immediately on his arrival he was committed a prisoner to the Castle. Captain Hotham dispatched a messenger to the Queen at : Newark, with orders to tell her " that he was a prisoner and soon to be sent to the Parliament ; that she was to send troops to rescue him, for which he promised to surrender Hull, Beverley, and Lincoln." The messen- ger, having arrived at Newark, delivered his message to the Queen, who, being suspicious, expressed her -doubt of his being the Captain's messenger, "and demanded some proof of his enjoying his masters con- fidence." The man, who was named John Kay, an old confidential servant, said he was the person that had delivered a letter to her, from Sir John when she was at Burlington. She then promised to do her utmost to release him. Soon afterwards Captain Hotham found means to escape, and he proceeded to Hull by way of Hessle. Sir John feeling indignant at the treatment his son had received, called a council of war, when it was unanimously agreed that a complaint should be made to Parliament against Oliver Cromwell for the false accusation and imprisonment of Captain Hotham. A long letter was sent, denying any treachery on the part of the Governor or his son. It was signed by Sir Edward Rhodes, Sir Thomas JBinnington, Captain Wm Hotham, Captain Anlaby, Robert Legard, (senior), Captain Overton, Captain Legard, Captain Bishop, and Major Gooderick. Not- withstanding this, the Commons were so well convinced of the truth of the information they had received, that they made no answer to this remonstrance, but sent orders to Captain Meyer, of the "Hercules" man-of- war lying in the Harbour, and to Sir Matthew Boynton Sir John Hotham's brother-in-law, to consult with the Mayor, Mr. Thomas Raikes, to seize the Governor and ■ HULLIXIA. 35 ' his son, Sir John Rhodes and their adherents, and send them up prisoners to London. Previous to putting their orders into execution, a report was circulated in the town, tending to fill the inhabitants with apprehension against the Governor, namely, that he intended to burn and plunder the town in conjunction with the royalists. The Corporation met to consult by what means they should effect the capture of the Governor and his son, and executed their purpose in the following manner : — Capt. Meyer -or Moyer sent ioo men, well armed, from his ship to the Garrison-side before daylight to surprize the Castle and Block-houses. They secured Captain Hotham, and placed a guard on the Governors house, and re- mained quiet until daylight, when they sent a party to take Sir John Hotham, who, having received timely notice, found an opportunity to escape by a back way, ; attended by six of his body guards, and, meeting a man on horseback in the town, he ordered him to dis- mount, took his horse, and passed through the guard at Beverley Gate, where no orders had reached to stop him. On hearing of his escape, his pursuers, having provided horses, soon followed him. They overtook the guard first, and made them prisoners. They also elicited that Sir John was making all haste to his house at Scorborough, near Beverley, which was fortified with men and cannon. When they arrived at Beverley Road, his pursuers learned that he had quitted the regular route, and proceeded towards Sculcoates and thence to Stoneferry, where he hoped to be able to cross the river Hull ; but there being no boats about, and the tide being too rapid to swim across with his horse, he proceeded to Wawne Ferry, where he met with the same obstacle. He was therefore obliged to pursue the only road left open to him, and rode on to Beverley, hoping the news had not preceeded him. 36 HULLINIA, Unfortunately he was mistaken, orders having reached Colonel Boynton to seize him if he passed that way. Sir John dashed into the town, but found 800 men in arms waiting to receive him. When he came up to them, he ordered them to follow him, which they did, not knowing what had happened in Hull, but on proceeding a little further up the town, he was met by the Colonel, who taking hold of his horse's bridle, said " Sir John you are my prisoner, and although I revere you as my relative, I am obliged with reluctance to waive all respect on that account, and arrest you as a traitor to the State." To this Sir John answered : — - " Well kinsman, since it must be so, I will submit/' or words to that effect. At the same time, seeing an open lane between him and the soldiers, he suddenly set spurs to his horse, and disengaging himself, was making off at full speed. The Colonel shouted to his men to follow him and knock him clown. He was accordingly struck with the butt end of a musket on his head which dismounted him in a bleeding condition, and taken to the same house where Charles had lodged after he had been refused admittance into Hull. Sir John was soon after sent under a strong guard to Captain Meyer, who, receiving him on board his ship, with his son and Sir John Rhodes, set sail for London, and delivered them to Parliament, by whom they were committed to the Tower. A formal charge of high treason was made against them. Though they had many friends and the evi- dence was very strong against them, they remained many months prisoners in the Tower before being brought to trial. But when the new party prevailed, at the head of which was Cromwell, the two Hothams were tried at a court of war for treachery and treason. Those who had hitherto protected them, now lost their power, and accordingly on the 1st of December, 1643, Sir John Hotham and his son were brought to trial at the Guildhall, London, before the Earl of Manchester HULLINIA. 37 and others. They were accused of betraying the trust reposed in them by Parliament ; of favouring the enemy ; of holding correspondence with the Queen, the Earl of Newcastle, Lord Digby, and others of the royal party ; and of an attempt to betray the town of Kingston- upon-Hull to the King. There was also a particular charge against Sir John for suffering the escape of Lord Digby from Hull when he was there a prisoner. The proofs against them were many, by actions and by letters which had been intercepted. Some were written by the hand of the father, and were found among the papers of the Earl of Newcastle who had been taken in battle. One letter was brought against the son, which had been produced through the treachery of his servant. Thirty witnesses were pro- duced. Many of the charges were denied but they were both convicted, and condemned to lose their heads. Sir John presented a petition to the House of Lords, and the Lords passed a vote to pardon Sir John, and desired the concurrence of the Commons. But such was the feeling against him, that upon the question being put, it was carried in the negative with- out a debate. The father was sentenced to die first, and the son the day following ; but as Sir John was going to execution on Tower Hill — where an immense crowd had gathered — a reprieve for three days, arrived from the House of Lords. The Commons, highly in- censed at this, sent to the Lieutenant of the Tower, and ordered him to proceed to the execution of Sir John Hotham, " according to the sentence of the Court Martial/' By this accident it happened that the son suffered the day before his father, on the ist of January, 1644. He shewed great courage on the occasion, declaring " that as for the ungrateful Parliament, he had not been guilty of treason towards them, who were the principal authors of the rebellion, by waging an unjust war 38 HULLINIA. against their Sovereign and fellow subjects," and with great fortitude submitted to the block. Sir John, the morning before his execution, pro- cured a motion to be made in the House of Commons, for his pardon which occasioned a debate. He ex- pected the news of a reprieve up to the last moment, and his execution was delayed until two o'clock in the afternoon, but the Commons did not grant the petition. He seemed more apprehensive of death than his son. All hope being banished, he composed himself for death. He was conducted to the same place, attended by Mr. Peters, where he spoke as followeth : — " Gentlemen, — I know no more of myself but this, that I deserve this death from Almighty God, nay that I deserve damnation and the severest punishments from Him. But as for the business of Hull, the be- traying of it from the Parliament, the ministers have all been with me, and given me good counsel ; neither was I in any ways guilty of it ; that is all I can say to that act. For other offences, rash words, anger, and such things, no man hath been more guilty. I beseech God to forgive me. I have received as many favours as any man from God, and I have been as ungrateful as any man could be. But God Almighty, I hope, has forgiven me my sins, and I desire you all to pray for me, that I may be forgiven. I hope God Almighty will forgive me, the Parliament, and the Court Martial, and all men that have had anything to do with my death. And, gentlemen, I thank this worthy gentle- man (H. Peters) for putting me in mind of it, and I pray God to bring more things into my memory. And gentlemen, look to it all, as I. I have received many mercies, and have been unfruitful, ungrateful under them ; and God hath let me see, that though for this offence whereof I am accused, He hath not done it ; yet He hath brought this affliction upon me to save my soul, by and through the merits of Jesus Christ : for, alas, this affliction is nothing to all my sins. God HULLINIA. 39 Almighty kept me from my trial at St. Albans and other places, to bring me to this place, that I hope I shall glorify God in, and His blessed name be for ever glorified/ 1 ' After he had finished, his head was severed from his body. Thus perished Sir John Hotham; who, it is said, owed his unhappy fate to his want of resolution, and whose unsteady behaviour towards the party he espoused was visible from the first time he acted for Parliament. He did not intend to proceed to such lengths, but his pride and ambition got the better of him. He had real affection for the King; he was adverse to a civil war, and jealous of the Parliament's preference of Lord Fairfax to the Lieutenancy of the north ; he was surrounded with spies of his inexorable masters ; he consequently fell a sacrifice to their merciless system of unrelenting vengeance, recalling to the minds of both parties, that he had at length re- ceived in his own person, the imprecations he had uttered at the w r alls of Hull: — " That God would bring confusion on him and his, if he were not a loyal and faithful subject to his majesty ! " I have now completed the design laid down at the beginning of this sketch, of narrating an historical ac- count of the Hothams, and the various influences under which they acted. Historians have denounced them for their vacillating conduct ; but at the period when Sir John Hotham was appointed Governor of Hull, the great rebellion which soon followed may not have been anticipated by him. He was between doubt and fear whether Charles would not be able to put his foot down and tread out the treason ; the great Cromwell at that time, was merely a Colonel in the Parliamentary forces. Thus Sir John was placed in a most critical position, and everything betokened, what he seemed to fear by his conduct, namely, loosing his head. And now having finished all I intended, having thrown together nearly all the material transactions of the Hothams and Hull, space will not permit me to 4-0 HULLINIA. enlarge further on that important historical period, which ended in Charles likewise being beheaded. But I hope I have sufficiently interested those who are not familiar with the subject to take up the remainder of the story, and study for themselves the characters and abuses that existed at the period of history I have been alluding to. You will, in the struggle that followed between the ' Cavaliers ' and ' Roundheads/ learn the meaning of the sentence — that the people of England, when aroused to a sense of duty, are the fountain of power — the original seat of majesty. If they find the power they have conferred abused by their trustees, violated by tyranny, their authority prostituted to support violence, or laws grown as pernicious as they were in King Charles's reign — then it is their right, and what is their right is their duty, to resume that dele- gated power, and to extirpate tyranny and oppression. The British Constitution is founded on ' common good/ on free and equal laws — a Constitution, in which the majesty of the people is and has been frequently recognised, in which kings are made and unmade by the choice of the people — a Constitution, in fine, the nurse of heroes, the parent of liberty, the patron of learning and arts, the domain of laws, the pride of Britain, and the envy of the world. Let all then guard our sacred Constitution against the profligacy and prostitution of the corrupters and the corrupted. OUR ANCIENT CHURCH-YARDS, Our Ancient Church-yards. HOLY TRINITY. few words on the above title, by way of intro- duction. I paid a visit recently to the two ancient Parish Churches of this town, for the purpose of seeing if any alterations had been made besides merely restoring them, and, to my surprise, I found great changes had taken place not only in the sacred edifices themselves, but also in their graveyards. Many memorials of men of local rank had been removed, and crowds of headstones were huddled to- gether in the graveyard adjoining the Holy Trinity Church. The two old burial grounds have been entirely metamorphosed, and whilst formerly " shattered w r ith age, and furrowed with years," they have been, thanks to a rather recent enactment, closed for inter- ment, the remaining head-stones prostrated, the ground levelled, and gravel placed in the interstices. What was once green and rank, crowded with grave-stones and irregular graves, now presents a smooth and level surface. The earth itself was, as it were, saturated with what is called the " dust of man," and the whole appeared a " hideous and mis-shapen length of ruins." 44 HULLINIA. Sanitary laws for preserving the health of the people have prevailed ; and our venerable church-yards are now no more resting places for our dead. The reader conversant with classics will call to mind the beautiful lines translated by Fawks : — " Alas ! the meanest flowers which gardens yield, The vilest weeds that flourish in the field, Which dead in wintry sepulchres appear, Revive in spring, and bloom another year ; But we, the great, the learn' d, the wise, Soon a3 the hand of death has closed our eye3, In tombs forgotten lie ; no suns restore, We sleep, for ever sleep, to wake no more." I am one of those persons who believe that where- ever man is placed he becomes in a manner related to the locality. The continued presence of objects, of whatever kind, exercise an influence upon his thoughts, leading him to find pleasure in the remembrance of the past. There is always a charm in reviewing bygone days. To me there is something peculiarly interesting in antiquarian lore. Born, reared, educated, and still living under the shadow, as it were, of that stately pile, it is somewhat excuseable if I confess that I have a strong attachment for the venerable edifice of Holy Trinity Church, where, for many centuries, generation after generation has met for Divine worship ; and it must rejoice all classes and creeds to see it being once more restored to something like its pristine glory — not exactly to its original state ; for in its infancy it was simply " a chapel," and deserved no other appellation. The brick portion of the Chancel at the east end is the oldest part of the present fabric. The present splendid tower was not always of the same lofty height w r e now see it ; and by close examination it will be found to possess three different styles of architecture. When churches were first built towers were not erected, and several of the old plans of Hull present Holy Trinity without one. From the road, rail or river is seen this majestic tower, gladdening the hearts of those who have wandered over many seas, and welcoming, as it HULLINIA. 45 were, the exile to his home. Yes, there it stands, braving the storm and seeming to brood over the floating tide of humanity passing to and fro beneath its shade. And as we are hurried on in the rapid tide and through the rough waves and billows of time, the tower seems to stand up prominent, like a light-house with a revolving lantern, sometimes turning its dark side — sounding the death knells — sometimes its light side — pealing the joy bells. There it stands based on a rock — the rock of the past — firm with the strength of ages. It stands like a monitory beacon, and has witnessed " The race of glory run, That marked ambition's setting sun." Many generations have passed away in its time. Many have gathered about the graves with mournful hearts and bitter feelings at the loss of some beloved one. Within the walls of the ancient Church many joined in prayer and praise — there where " Through the long drawn aisles and fretted vault, The pealing anthem swells the note of praise " — and where pulpit preachers grew eloquent. Where is now the lifted arm — the force of words — the well-tuned voice — the dispassionate discourse ? All is gone. They are fled, as though they ne'er had been. But we are told and taught to believe that when the trumpet shall sound, the slumbering dust shall awake and rise to a life of immortality, resembling the weary bird, which, at the close of evening, kt Cowers down, and dozes till the dawn of day ; Then claps his fledged wings, and soars away." It is not necessary to give a detailed descrip- tion of the Church of Holy Trinity, seeing that it has been so often described by recent writers. I will, therefore, simply give a cursory sketch of it as it is at present being restored. You are all aware, I daresay, that it is the largest parish church in England, with one exception. Its plan is cruciform. From east to west the extreme length is 272 feet ; the tower rising 46 HULLINIA. from the intersection. The east end is of the Decor- ated period ; the Nave, of the Perpendicular. At the end of the Nave is a noble recessed doorway and three grand windows. The great central window is of nine lights, and occupies the entire breadth of the Nave, reaching to the parapet. The Clerestory of the Nave contains sixteen windows of three lights each. The east end abuts on the Market-Place, and contains a magnificent window of seven lights, and is filled with beautiful specimens of stained glass, containing em- blematic figures of different descriptions. The seven personages beneath them represent the prophet Isaiah, and the remainder, the Apostles. In 1835, three of the lower compartments of the window were filled with representations of Faith, Hope, and Charity. This window measures 40 feet by 20, and since its restora- tion, has been filled with stained glass by piece-meal, " and consequently is not so effective as the sister window at the west end on account of want of uni- formity. The west window is filled with splendid speci- mens of stained glass in nine divisions illustrative of some passages of the Bible, and all bearing on the subject of the Holy Trinity. The nine great lights are memorials of George Alden, of Sutton Grange and Hull, who died in 1844, aged 86 years, and Mary, his wife ; Joseph Gee, of Hull, Merchant, who died in i860; Robert Martin Craven, of Hull, Surgeon, who died in 1859; William Ringrose, of Hull, Merchant, who died in 1845, aged 65 years ; William Wooley, Clerk of the Peace for the Borough, who died in 1837 ; John Taylor, of Hull, Merchant, who died in 1856; R. C. Young, who died in 1856, and Anne, his wife, and Charlotte and Jessie their children ; Mary Barkworth, who died in 1842; and John Cressey, who died in 18 10, aged 77 years, and Elizabeth, his wife, who died in 1778, aged 52 years. The Chancel is most spacious in its dimensions. Previous to the restoration of the great east window, HULLINIA, 47 the large painting on plaster, of the Lord's Supper, by M. Parmentier occupied its place; but when the window was completed the painting was removed to Hessle Church. It has, however, been recently returned and deposited in the transept of Holy Trinity. The Transept is supposed to have been added in the reign of Edward II., and it is highly probable that the Chancel was built at the same time. Mr. Scott, the eminent church architect, asserts that the Chancel belongs to the 14th century; but Mr. Sheahan is of opinion, that on account of the Transept not being in proportion with the other parts of the church, it was not enlarged when the Chancel was extended or rebuilt. Under the first floor the tower has been beautifully adorned with a new groined oak ceiling, in keeping with the transept style of architecture, (Gothic), highly decorated and splendidly illuminated, rich in gilt and colouring, designed by Messrs. Burlinson and Grylls, London, and ably executed by Mr. Dreyer, Hull. Both externally and internally the fabric is undergoing a thorough restoration, and in several parts is being ele- gantly embellished ; notably, the embattled parapet that runs along the ridge of the Clerestory, Aisles and Chant- ries, at the east end of the church ; and fortunately there were sufficient remains from the crumbling ruins, that the Architect was enabled to make out the original form and style of architecture as when first constructed, and when the dingy walls are removed, and supplanted with a light palisading, our ancient Parish Church will be one of the most chaste, magnificent, and beautiful edifices in Yorkshire. Perhaps it would not be out of order before we leave the Tower, to quote Ray the naturalist, who visited Hull in the year 1661, and makes the following remarks : — " In the morning we went to see the great church. The Choir is very fair and large, but built of brick. From the steeple we had a prospect of the town, which is fair and well built. It is fenced with a strong-built wall and a double ditch, with 48 HULLINIA. a high earthwork between them. The Governor of the town, at our being there, was the Lord Bellasis." He also adds an old saying, that M When Dighton is pulled down — Hull shall become a great town." But my immediate purpose is to give the origin and early history of our ancient Churchyards, and from the wreck of names memorice sacrce to rescue a few from the wreck of oblivion ; for mingled with their hallowed dust lie interred illustrious dead — men once famed in the early annals of our town, but now " dubious and forgot/' Soon after the restoration of Charles II., an Act was passed restoring expelled ministers to their re- spective livings, and appointing others to such as were vacant. The Corporation of Hull thought this an excellent opportunity for detaching the dependency of High Church from the Hessle Parish Church ; the former being a Chapel-of-ease to the latter. An Act of Parliament for this purpose received the royal assent, on the 20th of December, 1661, and Holy Trinity thus became a Parish Church. The living of Holy Trinity is a Vicarage, not in charge, and in the hands of trustees. The Rev. Canon Brooke, M. A., is the Vicar ; to whom the town is deeply indebted for his indefatigable exertions in aid of the restoration and adornment of this magnificent edifice. Along the south-side of the church extending the whole length of the Choir, are the remains of former Chantry Chapels. It was an ancient custom for per- sons of wealth and position to build small chapels to their parish churches, and these were endowed with lands sufficient to pay for the maintenance of one or more chanters, who were to sing masses at the altars erected therein, for the soul of the founder, and those of his ancestors and posterity. The High Church had at least 20 of these endowed Chantries, and mostly HULLINIA. 49 were on both sides of the Choir. The remains of several have been discovered during the present res- toration of the building. The first of these on record was founded in 1328, by Richard de Gretford, alder- man and merchant of this town, who bequeathed a messuage lying in Bedford-Lane, on the north side of the " Great Chapel of Hull." The same year John Rotenherying, merchant, of Hull, founded a Chantry here, and Sir Michael de la Pole founded one in 1380; Richard Ravenser, Arch-deacon of Lincoln, in 1385, founded another; Robert de Cross founded one in 1408 ; John Gregg founded another in 1420 ; John Bedford founded one about the year 1450 ; also, John Alcock, Bishop of Rochester — who subsequently be- came. Lord High Chancellor of England — in 1489, built a small chapel on the south of this church, near the " great porch " ; and amongst others were those founded by Hugh Hanby (merchant), Madam Darrys, Robt. Matthew, Dr. John Riplingham, Thos. Wilkinson (alderman), Margaret Dubbing, and John Eland, Kt. When King Henry VIII. suppressed all Chantries, the rich revenues from endowments were nearly all lost to the church. During the restoration of the Nave, a monumental arch was found near the Vicar's Porch. There is also a similar arch at the east end of the South Aisle. Here are several fragments of little square in- laid bricks, upon each of which are old English letters, and coats of arms of the supposed founders of and contributors to the church. When the workmen were clearing away the debris of the old chantries adjoining, previous to their restoration, several bricks of a similar character were found in the floors ; consequently it is evident that they have been originally paved with these old English tiles. Through the courtesy of the Town Clerk, G. C. Roberts, Esq., who voluntarily placed at my disposal the privilege of examining the ancient records in the archives of the Corporation, I have been enabled 50 IIULLINIA. to extract one of many specimens therein, — a copy of a curious and hitherto undiscovered record of the proceedings of the " Gilde of Blessed Virgin Mary, in the Chapel of Sainte Trinity in Kyngeston-upon- Hull." It is written on parchment and bound, in hog-skin, and on the inner cover is the following : — ■ "Memorandum. — That this Book was bought at i Six Oa/cs,' the 12th dav of December, in the year of our Lord God, 1462, by John Eland of Hull. Price, 23s." " The Accounts of John Rydesdale, Alderman of the Gilde of our Blessed Virgin Marie, in the Chapel of Sainte Trinitie, and John "Wylson and Thomas Wynflet, Scnesoallors of the same Gilde, the 10th of April, in the year of our Lord, One Thousand Four Hundred Seventy and Six, and in the Sixteenth year of the Reign of King Edward the Fourth." Amongst other things shewing the Annual Income and Expenditure of the said Gilde, it is re- corded as follows, viz : — ROGER BUSSELL, ) WILLIAM ELAND, [ Auditors. ROBERT TWYER, ) " Jewells belonging unto our Lady Gilde remayng in the kepyng of Sjr Robert Davy, Prest of the said Gilde. " Fyrst one old hayr for our ladys Alter. " Itm 1 newe hayr for the same Alter " Itm 1 old Frontell of grene " Itm 2 alter clothes of Twyll " Itm 1 Frontell of damask wt. Flours of Gold " Itm 1 alter cloth of ye same mark " Itm 1 alter cloth of whit for lentyn Seson " Itm 1 vestement of cloth of gold wt. a corpax of ye same " Itm 1 old vestment of whit Fustion " Itm 1 Grene vestment wt. a corpax of red " Itm 1 Masse buke and 1 chalex " Itm 1 Frontell of grene " Itm 4 alter cloth of whit of the Crownacion of our Lady SayntKatryn and Saynt Margret vyrgyncs and marters in the same l< Itm 1 new vestment of whit " Itm 1 pruce chust bounden wt. Iron " Itm 1 alter clothe of newe clothe We must now return to the descriptive portion of the church proper. Above the Vicars Porch is a Memorial Window provided by the family, in stained glass, to the late venerable Vicar, Rev. J. H. Bromby, M. A. The centre compartment represents Aaron in his full robes as High Priest, with the legend " Thy Priests shall be clothed with righteousness." In the other compartments (2) HULLIXIA. 5 1 Aaron stands before the Altar of Sacrifice ; (3) Before the Altar of Incense ; (4) Before the Holy of Holies, and (5) Cleansing the Leper. Henry VIII, granted the house and site, and all houses, buildings, orchards and gardens belonging to the White Friary, to John Heneage, which subse- quently became the property of Mr. Alderman Ferres, who, in 162 1, granted the same to the Trinity House. The earliest notice of a place of religious worship in Hull, was in the reign of King John, 1204, when we find the Monks of Melsa were compelled to re-build a chapel here, which they had destroyed previous to that year, and before the building of High Church. Doubtless Divine service was performed almost from the beginning of the town's foundation, though, perhaps as Gent says, " in little chapels of wood " ; for the late Dr. Alderson possessed a " Piscina," which was said to have been dug up on the site of the ancient Chapel of Myton. The late Mr. Frost says on the authority of a respectable eye-witness to the disinterment of bodies in the year 1787, when a paddock belonging to Wm. Casson was opened out for the purpose of making bricks, that, at a little distance below the surface of the earth in different parts of the close, about 70 skeletons were found. This paddock, he seems to think, was the burial ground of the Chapel of Myton. The site of this field is now what is known as Lister-Street. Mr. Thomas Thompson, F.S.A., says, that he has reason to believe, that the Chapel in Myton destroyed by the Monks of Melsa, stood upon a part of the present site of Holy Trinity Church. This we do know, that in 1296, Hull possessed a Priory of Carmelite Brethren and a stately Chapel, which now forms the Chancel of the Church of Holy Trinity. In the certificate re- turned by one Leonard Beckwith, [dated 12th August, 30th Henry VIII.] upon the survey of the estates belonging to Sir Wm. Sidney, Kt., the Carmelite Chapel in Hull is thus mentioned ; — " Also there are 52 HULLINIA. two howses of Freers wythin the sayd towne of Kyngston-upon-Hull, the oon call'd the Whyht Freers, and thother the Austyne Freers, and the chauncel of the churches of the sayd Freers, wyth part of the cloysters, be coverd with lead and the sayd Sir William is founder of them." (ex orig.) In the year 13 12, as the people began to flourish, they were inspired to raise a building which was more becoming the peformance of Divine worship. How- ever we have no historical account of the existence of any church or chapel, until 1285, when, according to a MS. in the British Museum, the High Church was founded as a chapel by James Helward, the mother church, as the MS. states, being at Hessle. The family of Helward, or Helleward was of considerable importance in Hull at a very early period. Adam Helleward, in 1301, resided on the west-side of High- Street, according to the town records. In his will, which is preserved in the records of the Corporation, he states : — " In the first place I commend my soul to God, and my body to be buried in the churchyard of the Holy Trinity of Kingston-upon-Hull," &c. In 1325, one Walter Helleward was Collector of the Customs at Hull conjointly with Richard de la Pole, and in 1341 and 1342 he filled the office* of Mayor of the town, while one John Helleward held the post of Bailiff of the Borough in. the years 1338, 1339 and 1340. Gent and the other historians must have made a mistake in the date 1312, because we have the evidence of the pastoral letter of Archbishop Corbridge ad- dressed in 1 30 1 to the Prior of Gisburne, patron of the Hessle Church, asking for the dedication of a cemetery to the Chapel of the town of " Kingstone " — thus show- ing that there was a chapel then standing, though without any burial ground attached. PI is reason is thus given, " that in conveying the bodies of deceased per- sons along the banks of the Plumber for interment at the Parish Church of Hessle, it sometimes happens, HULLINIA. 53 in the winter especially, that both bodies and atten- dants are washed away by the waters of the river, and at other times the people are exposed to great danger, etc. Dated Burton, March 18th, in the 2nd year of our pontificate, A.D., 1301." The burial ground is described in the will of John Schayl, in 1303, who bequeathed ^20 to be paid out of his estate, and required to be buried in the churchyard. The family of Schayl, who lived in " Scale-Lane/' and had the principal part of the property there, gave it its modern name. It is called "Scailane" in an original deed, dated 6th May, 1433, " whereby an annual rent of 100s, w T as made payable out of a messuage there, adjoining upon the premises late of William Froste and then of John Box." In the year 1320, the chapel-yard being too small for the town, the inhabitants petitioned King Edward II. to grant them a certain piece of ground, called " Le Hailles," lying at the west end of the church, which he accordingly did. Borlase says, " the wakes and feasts instituted in commemoration of the dedication of parochial churches were highly esteemed among the primitive christians, and regularly kept on the Saint's day to whose memory the church was dedicated. On the eve of this day, prayers were said and hymns were sung all night in the church ; and from these watchings the festivals were styled Wakes, which name continues in many parts of England, although the vigils have been long abolished. Hospinian cites in his Fourth Book of the " Regnum Papisticum" a picture of the excesses used in his time, at the Feast of Dedication ; thus translated : — " The Dedication of the Church is yerely had in minde, With worship popish catholicke, and in a woundrous kfnde : From, out the steeple hie is hangde a cross and banner fayre ; The pavements of the temple strowde with hearbes of pleasant ayre ; The pulpets and the aulters all that in the church are seen, And every pewe and pillar great ar deckt with boughes of greene ; The tabernacles opened are, and images are drest, But chiefly he that patron is, doth shine among the rest," &c. 54 HULLINIA. At a Newcastle wake, in 1 758, the following notice was circulated : — " On this day (May 22) the annual diversions at Swalwell will take place, which will con- sist of dancing for ribbons, grinning for tobacco, women running for smocks, ass races, foot courses by men, with an odd whim of a man eating a cock alive, feathers, entrails, &c." These holy feasts are not yet altogether abolished ; and in the County of Durham, Hutchinson, in his History, says that many are yet cele- brated. They were originally Feasts of Dedication in commemoration of the consecration of churches, in imitation of Solomon's great convocation at the con- secration of the Temple at Jerusalem. In Sir Aston Cokain's Poems, 1658, p. 210, is the following : — " To Justice Would-be." " That you are vext their walces your neighbours keep, They guess it is because you want your sleep ; Therefore wish that you your sleep would take, That they (without offence) might keep their wake" A word or two upon the anniversary of the dedi- cation of the two Churches of Holy Trinity and Saint Mary. These were commonly called feasts, wakes, or ales. (The word wake is derived from the Saxon wak, drunkenness.) The Hebrew nation constantly keep their anniversary of dedication in remembrance of Judas Maccabeus, their deliverer, and in commemo- ration of the dedication of their Temple at Jerusalem. So it became an ancient custom among the early christians of this island to keep a feast every year, in remembrance of the finishing of the building of their parish churches. As I have shewn, great irregularities and licentiousness crept in, especially in the church- yards ; but in the reign of Henry VIII, statutes were made to regulate and restrain them. Hull was not free from this kind of dissipation. The first intention of this watching was good and pious, till at length from hawkers and pedlars coming here to sell their petty wares, the merchants set up stalls and booths in the churchyards, and not only those who lived in the two HULLINIA. 55 parishes to whom the churches belonged resorted thither, but numbers from the adjoining towns and villages. The wakes continued in Hull until the reign of James I, when they were suppressed by the then Archbishop of York. The High Church wake was held on the ioth of March, and St. Mary's the 8th. Another peculiar custom was that of planting trees in churchyards, which seems to derive its origin from ancient funeral rites. Historians think they were planted to screen the churches from the wind, and that as churches were built low at this time (in the reign of Edward I.), the thick foliage of the yew tree answered the purpose better than any other, and protected the edifices from storms. The old historian Gent says, that the trees were planted in the churchyards so that the people might refresh their souls by contemplation under them, after Divine service. In 1462, the Vicar of Holy Trinity sent for Robert Tetney and Richard Wright, hewers of wood, whom he ordered to cut down one of the largest and most ornamental trees, for reasons best known to himself. They had scarcely obeyed his commands before the Mayor of Hull heard of it, and sending for them committed both to prison for daring to commit such an action without advice and consent of the bench and churchwardens ; and on the next Hall day, sending for the Vicar, told him " That, by the constitution of the church, neither he, his pre- decessors, or any other person, had power to destroy what was placed there for the preservation of that venerable building ; " the Vicar humbly craved their pardon, but was ordered at his own expense to plant 6 trees in the churchyard, for that one he had ordered to be cut down ; all which the good Vicar performed accordingly. Perhaps it would not be unadvisable here to leave our special subject for a short period whilst I allude to church bells. I have not been able to learn when bells were first 56 HULLINIA. rung in the tower of the High Church. The lower portion of the tower, which is 147J feet high, is part of the original structure, and was formerly only a few feet from the roof of the church. The upper stages, that is the belfry, &c, are of a later date, and any one can see with the naked eye where it has been lengthened. During the mayoralty of William Fenwick (1727), a new set of bells was hung in the steeple which were rung for the first time on the 17th of April. Neither have I been able to ascertain precisely the date of the invention of bells. The ancients had some sort of bells, for I find the word tintinnabula, which we usually render bells, in Martial, Juvenal, and Suetonius. Bells were used by the Romans to summon them to their hot baths. The Hebrews, according to Josephus, used trumpets. The Turks do not permit the use of them at all. In an account of the gifts made by St. Dunstan to Malmsbury Abbey, it says, " That bells were not very common in that age, for that prelate's liberality, it is said, consisted chiefly in such things as were wonder- ful and strange in England, among which he reckons the large bells he gave them." Bells were known among the Persians and Greeks at an early period, and the early christians in Italy naturally applied them to denote the hours of devotion ; but it does not appear that large bells were used in churches to summon the people to Divine worship before the sixth century. According to Bede large bells such as sounded in the air, and called a numerous congregation together, were not adapted to the use of the Anglo-Saxon church, until the year 680. In catholic times, here, it has been customary to toll the passing bell at all hours of the night as well as by day; as the following extract from the church- warden's accounts for the Parish of Wolchurch, A.D. 1526, proves; " Item, the clerke to have for tollynge of the passynge belle, for manne, womanne, or childes, if it be in the day, iiijd. Item, if it be in the night, for HULLINIA. 57 the same, viijd. ,> See Strutt's Manners. In Ray's Collection of Old English Proverbs is the following couplet : — w When thou dost hear a toll or knell, Then think upon thy passing bell." Bourne considers the custom as old as the use of bells themselves in christian churches, i.e., about the seventh century. Bede, in his Ecclesiastical History, speaking of the death of the Abbess of St. Hilda, says that one of the sisters of a distant monastery, as she was sleeping, thought she heard the well-known sound of that bell which called them to prayers when any of them had departed this life. The Abbess no sooner heard this than she raised all the sisters, and called them into the church, where she exhorted them to pray fervently, and sing a requiem for the soul of their mother. In Copley's Wits, Fits, and Fancies, 1614, p. 196, concerning " The ringing out at the burial" is this anecdote : — " A rich churl e and a beggar were buried at one time, in the same churchyard, and the bells rung out a maine for the miser: now, the wiseacre his son and executor, to the end the world might not thinke that all that ringing was for the beggar, but for his father, hired a trumpeter to stand all the ringing while in the belfrie, and betweene every peale to sound his' trumpet, and proclaime aloude and say, sirres, this next peale is not for R., but for maister N., his father/' Bells were a great object of superstition among our ancestors. Aubrey, in his Miscellanies, p. 148, says 11 At Paris, when it begins to thunder and lighten, they do presently ring out the great bell at the Abbey of St. Germain, which they do believe makes it cease. The like was wont to be done heretofore, in Wiltshire. When it thundered and lightened, they did ring St. Adeline's bell at Malmesbury Abbey." Dr. Frances Herring in " Certaine Rules, Directions, or Advertise- ments for this time of pestilentiall Contagion," 1625, advises thus "Let the bells in cities and townes be rung 58 IIULLINIA. often, and the great ordnance discharged ; thereby the aire is purified. " " The passing bell," says Grose, " was anciently rung for two purposes, one to bespeak the prayers of all good christians for a soul departing." An old proverb says — " When the bell begins to toll, Lord have mercy on the soul." When Lady Catherine Grey died a prisoner in the Tower, Sir Owen Hopton, who had then the charge of that fortress, u perceiving her to draw towards her end, said to Mr. Bokeham, were it not best to send to the church, that the bell may be rung. And she herself hearing him, said, ' Good Sir Owen let it be so/ Then immediately perceiving her end to be near she entered into prayer, and said, \ O Lord, into thy hands I commend my soul/ and so putting down her eyelids with her own hands, she yielded unto God her meek spirit, at 9 of the clock in the morning, the 27th January, 1567." As my remarks must necessarily be exclusively confined to the subject of death, I need not pursue the matter further, having given sufficient for my purpose. I will, however, narrate a very singular circumstance in connection with the Holy Trinity Church and its bells. In 1522, the church was put under an interdict. The windows and doors were closed with briars and thorns ; the pavement torn up ; and the bells, " once hallowed by baptism, as tho' their sounds should drive evil spirits afar/' as an old historian states, by way of parenthesis, were stopped, so that there was no tolling for prayer, or at the soul's departure from the body, no worship performed within the walls, neither christian burial allowed therein, or even in the churchyard, and every person who presumed to enter the place lay under an anathema. But no reason is assigned for this severe sentence. It is said by some historians, that it HULLINIA. 59 was for preaching a sermon against the Roman religion ; because some years after the vicar of North Cave was forced, in this town, to make public recantation of what he had delivered from the pulpit ; and was obliged on Sunday and market-day, to walk round the church in his shirt only, his arms, legs, and feet being quite bare, and, besides, to carry a large faggot, as though he deserved burning for what was then looked upon to be his great capital offence. Returning to the subject of interments, I will now proceed to select a few inscriptions on some of the memorials of the many eminent inhabitants that lie buried in the High Church and graveyard. The custom of laying flat stones in our churches and church- yards over the graves of the better class of persons, on which are inscribed epitaphs containing the name, age, character, &c, of the deceased, has been trans- mitted from very ancient times, as appears from the writings of Cicero and others. A brief statement of the mode of interment practised by the ancients, will not be out of place It is astonishing to read with what religious respect all nations, through all ages, have paid tribute to the memory of the dead. The earliest record of the disposition of the dead is to be found in Sacred History. It is there stated that Abraham purchased of Ephron, the Hittite, the cave of Machpelah, for a burial place, in which were interred his wife Sarah and himself, and subsequently Isaac and Rebecca, Jacob, and Leah. This clearly shews that the bodies in those days were committed to earthly burial. The early Christians followed the practice of interment in accordance with their religious opinion " earth to earth." We are informed that the early Germans, who possessed immense forests, creating a ready supply of fuel, burned their dead. The practice of burning is of great antiquity, and was generally adopted by the Ancients. There are noble descrip- tions in Homer of the obsequies of Patroclus and •60 HULLINIA. Achilles. In the reign of Julian, we find that the king of Chaonia burnt the body of his son, and interred the ashes in a silver urn. The Egyptians were afraid of fire — therefore by precious embalmment, and afterwards by deposition in dry earth, they contrived the most certain way of integral preservation. The Scythians, who swore by wind and sword, that is, by life and death, were so far from burning their bodies, that they declined all interment, and made their graves in the air. The custom of the Greeks and Romans, after burning the body, was to collect the bones and ashes, place them in urns, and deposit them about a yard deep in the earth. Many urns have been found in several parts of England, containing skulls, teeth, and jaws, bearing impressions of combustion. Near some of these Roman urns, coals and incinerated substances have been dug up. The urns have varied in size. This was to distinguish the great ones of the earth — showing that through all ages there has been a desire to be distinguished from the vulgar. Some had golden urns-— these were the first to have their bones dis- turbed. Great Princes affected great monuments. Ulysses cared not how meanly he lived, so that he might have a grand tomb after his death. Pyramids, arches, and obelisks, all go to show the vain-glory and mammoth pride of the Ancients. The ancient Britons — the aboriginal inhabitants of this country — buried their dead, not in churchyards or cemeteries as we do, but on the wolds and high places, scattered in every direction. They raised mounds of earth over the remains of the dead, and those mounds, barrows, or tumuli, were more or less elevated, accord- ing to circumstances connected with the locality, or according to the power or influence of the deceased. There are many ancient barrows in various parts of Yorkshire, especially in the south-eastern part of the county, or the wold district, several of which have been opened, and found to contain clay urns, burnt bones, HULLINIA. 6 1 and unburnt skeletons. Hence it is clear that the Britons burnt some of their dead — probably the bodies of persons of rank — and deposited the ashes in sepulchral urns. The Romans too practised cremation. When a Roman died, his body was laid out and washed, and a small coin was placed in his mouth, which, it was sup- posed, he would require to pay his passage in Charon's boat. If the corpse was to be burnt, it was carried on the day of the funeral in solemn procession to the funeral pile, which was raised in the place set apart for the purpose, called the Ustrinum. The pile was built of the most inflammable wood, and when the body was placed upon it, the whole was ignited by the relations of the deceased. When consumed, and the fire ex- tinguished, the nearest relatives gathered what re- mained of the bones and cinders of the dead and placed them in an urn, in which they were committed to the grave. Persons of rank were burnt with greater cere- monies than were observed on ordinary occasions, and on a spot chosen for the purpose, instead of the ordinary Ustrinum. Thus, when the Roman Emperor, Severus, died at York in the year 211, — York being then the capital of Roman Britain — his remains were reduced to ashes about 1^ miles westward of the city, on the mound ever since known as " Severus Hill!' But the Romans had other modes of sepulture besides that of cremation. The bodies were sometimes buried entire, but in somewhat different manners. The remains of the higher classes were sometimes deposited in sepulchral chests made of huge blocks of stone. These were generally very massive, formed out of the solid rock, and covered with a roof-shaped or flat lid. Massive chests or sarcophagi of this description appear ' — from their forms and inscriptions — to have stood above ground, and they present a very peculiar mode of sepulture. After the body had been laid apparently in full dress, on its back, at the bottom of the sar- 62 HULLINIA. cophagus, liquid lime was poured in, until the whole of the body was covered except the face ; this becoming hard, has preserved to a certain degree an impression of the form of the body, of which the skeleton is often found entire. Several examples of this mode of sepul- ture may be s^cn in the grounds and museum of the Yorkshire Philosophical Society at York. It is re- markable that the Roman tombs, with interments of this description found at York, generally contain the remains of ladies. In some instances the colour of the dress in which the corpse had been arrayed, has been transferred to the lime in which the body was enveloped. The practice of burying within church porches commenced in the days of Cuthred. The clergy, on account of their sacred functions, and the nobility of high rank, claimed to be interred within the temple. Founders of churches, and benefactors, became in- vested with the same right. Thus the privilege, which had only been conceded to individual merit, increased so rapidly, that the interiors of churches up to a recent period were crowded with the dead. Many places of worship, by repeated interments within, and inhumation around, caused emanations to arise from animal pu- trescence, that the atmosphere on all sides became impregnated with the odour of the dead. Of late years it has been found that churches were not intended for places of sepulture. The Government, deeming it a duty, closed all the burial grounds in cities and boroughs. The French nation were the first in providing suburban sepulture. The cemetery called " Pere la Chaise," was the first established. It is situated in the north-eastern suburbs of Paris, and continues to this day one of the most beautiful places of burial. It was formerly the property of the Order of Jesuits, with an elegant mansion attached, and was the country resi- dence of Father la Chaise, the confessor of Louis XIV. The Hebrews were the first nation to bury with- HULLINIA. 63 out the cities, in fields, or in their gardens, and their burial habits, according to the Scripture, have not been departed from to this day. Of late years cemeteries have been formed in the vicinity of towns, and it is worthy of note to see the great change which the opening of modern cemeteries has introduced, especially in the fashion of mortuary memorials. A superior classical taste has superceded the old style of brick vault The modern cemetery may be termed, as the Moravians call them, " Fields of Peace ;" for by the turf- clad mound of some beloved friend we are reminded of the past, and directed to the future. These visits now and then are soothing, and seem to remind us that the grave is the house appointed for all living. Such feelings and reflections could not be indulged in, when interments took place in the crowded, walled-in church- yards, surrounded on all sides by the overlooking habitations of the living, and exposed to every sort of intrusion. Our old churchyards have undergone great changes since they were closed. The stones that still exist have been prostrated. Some of them exhibit much excellence of lettering and are of great antiquity ; but there are very few inscriptions of a quaint or curious character. The limits of this volume will only allow my mentioning a few names of the illustrious men of rank that are interred in the Holy Trinity Church. Near the vestry door on the south wall of the Choir is the following inscription, written in Latin, and thus translated : — " Not far from this place lie interred George Barker, Knight, the father, (grand- father and great-grandfather) of George Barker, Esq., who, after he had done and suffered much for his king and country, especially for gallantly defending New- castle, against the rebellious Scots, at last submitted to an unequal fate, unworthy his great deserts, the 4th of August, 1669. But God would not suffer so great virtue to lie concealed. Though he died obscurely, he 64 IIULLINIA. was buried honourably; the Colonel of the Militia and the whole train-band attending his funeral, as a mem- orable example of valour and loyalty. At last, having lain buried more than 40 years, his nephew, Thomas Baker, Bachelor in Divinity, in St. John's College, in Cambridge, the heir, not more of his virtues, than of his adverse fortunes, pitying the unhappy fate of his dear grandfather, out of his great affection, caused this funeral monument to be erected in the year 1710." On the south side of the Chancel, on the ground, the effigies in brass are those of an alderman and his lady, with another Latin inscription, thus rendered : — " Here, O Richard Bylt, thou liest buried, (formerly an alderman and a merchant of good reputation) who died in two days' time, by the pestilence, in the year 1401." At the feet of the lady's effigy, also on the ground, is another Latin inscription : — " The earth being closed upon thee, thou art in silent rest, who lately enjoyed deserved honour, and was beloved for thy generous disposition, proceeding from an upright heart. This gentlewoman died in the month of October, in the 50th year of her age, and is now gone into the regions of bliss ; where, may she live happy for ever." There was, at the west end of the church, an epitaph upon the death of Wm. John Carleton, master mariner, lost in his long boat, 18th of November, 1674, aged 41 years, and son of William Carleton, merchant, sheriff, anno 1668 : — " Here rests his mortal part asleep again, Who was once saved nodding in the main, But cast the second time on Thetis' lap Ah ! providence sent none to hand him back ; The curl'd billows wept to see him lie, Divested of his immortality ! They found his remains above the deep, And now his dust does with his fathers sleep ; Waiting awaking, when all tempests co;iso, And tossed bodies land in perfect peace." Upon the same stone is the following: — " Now rests in his eldest son's urn, that divine philosopher William Carleton, gentleman, whose great wisdom and learning HULLINIA. 65 made him useful and desirable. He lived and died like a christian, April 17th, 1705, in the 84th year of his age." There are very few monuments in the church. The most remarkable one is in the south wall. The early historians are silent as to whom this monu- ment is intended ; but it is supposed by some to include the effigies, in alabaster, of Sir William cle la Pole and his wife, because they were buried in the chancel of this church. The figures are under a pedimental canopy. Sir William de la Pole, Earl of Suffolk, died in disgrace in France. Their effigies are supposed by Tickell to have been brought from the Charter House, where it is just possible his body was laid in state when it was brought home. At the dis- solution of monasteries, these effigies were placed at the door of an old chantry, founded by the Earl. Tickell also says, that the ground or vault under the effigies had been opened, as low as the foundation, but no trace was found of human remains. There are some old chantries or chapels yet left standing on the south side of the church. Previous to the Re- formation there were at least twenty of those small chapels. One of them was used by the Corporation as a Council Chamber ; but it was so cold that they forsook it about 180 years ago. The chantries re- maining have just been beautifully restored, and a few of the fragments of stained glass, that escaped destruc- tion by the fanatical mob of the 1 7th century, have been re-set in a window of one of the chantry chapels. In the floor of the north Aisle of the Nave is the grave slab of " The worshipful Joseph Field, twice Mayor of this town, and merchant adventurer," who died in 1627, aged 63 : — " Here is a Field sown, that at length must sprout, And 'gainst the ripening harvest's time break out ; When to that Husband it a crop shall yield, Who first did dress and till this new sown Field : Yet ere this Field you see, this crop can give, The seed first dies, that it again may live." " Sit Dens amicus, Sanctis, vcl in Sepulchris spea est.' 1 K 66 HULLINIA. Taylor, the water poet, alludes to this Wm. Field in his description of Hull in 1662. The following inscription is on the north of the altar : — " Here lieth the body of the worshipful John Ramsden, twice Mayor of this town, and merchant adventurer, who departed in the true faith of Christ, anno 1637 : — Mors omnibus communis.'" A fearful scourge happened during his mayoralty. This good merchant was one of the hundreds of persons that fell by a plague in the year 1638. This plague, which was raging in many seaports, also broke out in Hull. No wise precaution was able to prevent the contagion. The gates of Hull were soon ordered to be shut ; a strict guard was placed day and night in order to prevent anyone from going out or coming in ; and the watchmen only were allowed to receive pro- visions at places appointed for that purpose. No societies were permitted to meet ; the churches and schools were closed ; scarce any one walked the streets ; grass grew between the stones of the pavement; every- thing bore the stamp of melancholy ; and all seemed buried in solemn silence. In 1638, the sickness in- creased by the intemperature of the air ; the market was cried down ; provisions, brought from neighbouring villages, were obliged to be delivered at the garrison- side and afterwards forwarded on sledges to the Town's Cross to be disposed of; and trade and commerce sank into a gloomy state. This was the deplorable situation of above 2000 inhabitants of this town, who from opulent positions became piteous objects of charity ! Those who could afford it were heavily taxed weekly, to support the afflicted. The number that perished was about 2,730 persons. This pestilence continued unabated until about the 16th of June, 1639, when it ceased. It was about the middle of the visitation that Mr. Ramsden became a victim. He was a gentleman of great erudition, remarkable piety, and universal HULLINIA. 67 esteem. The Rev. Andrew Marvell. from the pulpit of the church, delivered to a weeping congregation a funeral sermon — afterwards printed — in moving oratory, urging all who heard him to bear cheerfully whatever might happen to them in their lamentable condition. At the west end of the church, on a grave stone, is pointed out the resting place of "Alderman Anthony Lambert, sometime Mayor of this corporation, who took to wife, Anne, the daughter of Mr. George Saltmarsh of this town, and by her had 8 sons and 5 daughters, and after he had lived 58 years piously towards God, faithfully towards his friends, and useful in his station to all, he departed this life the 28th of May, 1688, much lamented/' He held the office of Chamberlain in 166 1, and was Mayor of Hull in 1667 and 1682. On the restoration of King Charles II., 1662, his Ma- jesty was proclaimed on Monday the 8th of May. The news reached Hull on the 17th. Colonel Charles Fairfax, Governor, with the aldermen in their scarlet robes, met the day following and walked in procession to the Market- Place, where a scaffold had been pre- pared covered with red cloth, which they ascended, and the Mayor in a loud voice proclaimed his Majesty the King over the British realms. Trumpets sounded, drums beat, cannon roared, and the air seemed rent with acclamations. The common prayer up to this period, was read under the Market Cross by the Rev. Wm. Smith, surrounded by multitudes of devout people, which occasioned an order for such books to be procured for the two churches which were after- wards kept more sacred. The fonts for baptism were set up as usual, and the communion tables railed in below the ancient altar. The old Market Cross was at this period pulled down, and a new one erected. A spirited and original half-length portrait of this personage is now to be seen in the Property Committee room of the Town Hall. He is represented in his mayors robes of office, and is one of the very few of 68 HULLINIA. our ancient worthies, whose portraits are preserved in that building. In the Aisle of the Chancel is a plain epitaph as follows : — " Here lieth the body of the Right Worshipful Sir John Lister, Knight, twice Mayor of this town, who died, being a Burgess of Parliament, Deer. 23rd, A.D. 1640." It was during the mayoralty of this good and worthy knight that King Charles I. visited Hull, and was very hospitably treated by him, the King being his guest at his house in High-Street, better known now as " Wilberforce House/' The following historical account of what took place in Hull at that remarkable period may not prove unacceptable : — ■ " Towards the end of April, 1639, King Charles I., with a great and splendid retinue of dukes, earls, lords, knights, and gentry, set out from London to York, and so to his army in the north ; but being for some private reasons advised first to take a view of this town, he consented to it, and sent the Mayor word thereof two or three days beforehand, which, so soon as the Mayor understood, he immediately called a Hall, and there it was ordered that the Mayor, Aldermen, and the Recorder, in their scarlet gowns, and the best of the inhabitants, should attend at the gates to receive his Majesty with the most profound loyalty, humility, and respect ; that rails be made for forty persons to stand in at Beverley Gate Head, and a foot pace to kneel upon, and the place or station for the Mayor and Aldermen to be somewhat higher than the rest, and to have some rich carpet before them upon the rail, and the Mayor should make his most hearty and loyal obedience to the King, and deliver to his Majesty the keys of the town, together with a ribbon and a purse with one hundred pieces of gold in it ; that the Re- corder do prepare and make a speech unto his Majesty, and welcome him to the town in the name of the Mayor, Aldermen, and Burgesses ; and that as soon as it is ended, the Mayor shall have the great mace de- Sir Jn° Lister. Knight. Twice Mayor and Burgess inParliament 6rr Mngsten-u/kmBu/J, Obit Bee. 23. J640. HULLIXIA. 69 livered unto him, which having kissed it, shall deliver the same to his Majesty's hands, and receiving it again, he shall march before the King with the same upon his back or shoulder unto the lodgings." The following is a portion of the famous, fulsome address presented by the Recorder on that occasion at Beverley Gate ; Mr. Thorpe after making profound obeisance to his Majesty spoke as follows : — " Most Gracious Sovereign. ! " If the approaches to the thrones of heaven and earth had been 11 by the same way of access, we had done. Since learned by our daily " prayers unto the ' King of Kings,' to speak as might become us, unto " your sacred Majesty, whom God has now blessed and honoured us " with the presence of. But since these are different, and we not so " much conversant in the latter as in the former, we most heartily crave " your sacred pardon and grace for our rudeness, which is or may be " committed, opining, your Majesty, that they proceeded from nothing " but want of knowledge and skill how to receive and to express our- u selves upon the happy reception of so much glory. "Our full hearts make us almost unable to undergo what we " most thankfully undertake, and would stop all passages of speech and " make U3 dumb with the awful majesty that happy we, behold and " adore. "This town was always faithful and true, in respect of the " zealous and loyal affections of the people of the same, to your Majesty's " honour and service. It may be said, as it is of the city of Seville in " Spain, 'not only to be walled, but also to be garrisoned by fire,' not " dead nor asleep, nor absconded in senseless flints, but continually " vivacious, waking, ardent, apparent, and sensible in their courageous " and boiling heat for your Majesty's long life, welfare and happiness. u So that the town is not only yours by name, but also by nature — so " shall it ever remain to be. "Your Majesty hath not only here a magazine of all military " provisions of your own loyal collecting, ordering and appointment, " out also a richer store, a more noble and safe prize, even a magazine " of faithful and true hearts all the whole town over, which renders it " stronger for your Majesty's service, than if it had walls of brass or " iron. " Your Majesty's most noble predecessors built, encouraged, and " honoured it. The pious and good King Edward YL committed the " castle and block-houses of it to the perpetual keeping of the corpora- " tion. May your Majesty live for ever and ever, and may all the thorns " in your travels grow up into crowns ; may your battles be always " crowned with laurels, and may good success always attend your actions " and desires ; may your years be added unto your days, and length of " time, till time shall be no more." [The Recorder subsequently became a judge and the King's greatest enemy. J This grandiloquent speech being ended, his Majesty thanked them, — " protesting that as it was 70 HULLINIA. his duty and daily study, so he would wholly spend his life for the good of his people, and make it his utmost endeavour to preserve both the church as by law established, and the State from popery, destruction and ruin." The Mayor, Sir John Lister, then fell on his knees and, having kissed the mace, thus addressed his Majesty : — " Most high and mighty prince, I and my brethren do most heartily welcome your Majesty to your highness's royal town of Hull, and in token of our duty and respect, I deliver to your Majesty this emblem of royal authority and power, with the utmost humility, loyalty and confidence." Charles then took the mace in his hand and returned it immediately, say- ing, " Freely I return to you and your successors, and the whole town for ever, all the authorities and powers, privileges and charters, expressed and understood by this royal emblem ; use them to my honour and your own good, and then you will be happy." After the reading of this address of welcome by Recorder Thorpe, and the King having been pre- sented with a ribbon, which he tied in a knot on his hat, calling it his " Hull Favour," Sir John led the way to his house in the High-Street, where he entertained his Majesty that night amidst the joyful sounds of the church bells. Subsequently this same King Charles laid siege to Hull. He was refused admittance by the Governor, Sir John Hotham. This occurred on April the 23rd. The siege commenced on the 3rd of July — cannons thundering continually from the walls upon the royalists, and from their batteries in return upon the town. The siege was raised on the nth day of October, 1643, which day was afterwards kept a holiday. The num- ber slain during the struggle must have been great; for t on the 10th of October of the same year, complaints were made to the Mayor and Aldermen by the church- wardens of Holy Trinity Church, that the yard thereof HULLINIA. 71 was so full of dead bodies, that there was no room left to bury more, and further desired that leave might be given to treat for a garden in Trinity- House- Lane to bury the dead therein. Thus in this small graveyard, in the centre of this populous town, there are historic associations that carry us back over two centuries, and to the time when the people of Hull were the first to fight for religious and constitutional freedom. It was Sir John Lister, who, at his own expense, built the wall at the north side of the High Church, from the Chancel down to the Market-Place. He also erected an hospital for six men and six* women, like- wise a readers house adjoining, and endowed it with lands to the value of ^600 a year. He was elected Member of Parliament in 1640, but died before taking his seat. Another illustrious name may be seen at the west end of the church. In the south Aisle is the grave of Robert Nettleton, whose epitaph states that he was " Alderman and sometime Mayor of this town, and interred May 8th, 1706. He had 13 children by Lydia his wife, 7 of whom were buried in his grave. She was daughter of Mr. James Blaydes, and Anne his wife, daughter to the Rev. Andrew Marvel, and sister to Andrew Marvel, Esq., who about 20 years served this town as Member of Parliament." Alderman Robt. Nettleton, was the first Governor of the Poor of the Hull Incorporation. About the year 1698, the magistrates were em- powered to erect Houses of Correction, for idle persons, as well as places for honest poor people to employ themselves, if of strength and ability; and in 1699, Sir W. St. Quintin, Bart, and Charles Osborne, Esq., Members of Parliament for the borough, obtained an Act for promoting English manufactures, to incorporate and appoint trustees to take care of the children who formerly worked in the open Market- Place, to which end the ancient Cloth Hall — now the Branch Bank 72 IIULLINIA. of England, in Whitefriargate — was granted, under the town seal. In the year 1702, I find on looking over the old minute book of the Workhouse, the following copy of a codicil written on the back of his will, " that I give to the incorporation for the poor £5 a-year, to be paid them out of my house and staith situated in the High-Street, desiring from time to time, that my nearest relation, may be at the first vacancy, after he shall be 24 years old, if said corporation so please, chosen as a guardian of said corporation, desiring him and all to be very careful to promote the interest thereof being the best of charity." On further search into the records, I find his son being desirous of resid- ing in London and not having the same taste as his good father, disputed with the guardians the legality of the claim and subsequently settled with them by pay- ing the sum of £z°- In the middle Aisle of the Nave, rest the remains of Alderman George Crowle and his wife Eleanor, who was the daughter of Roger Kirby, by a daughter of Sir John Lowther, Bart. A blue marble slab indicates the spot, but the inscription is nearly obliterated. At one time it had inlaid his coat of arms in brass- — which has been removed — also the words, " Mayor in 1661 and 1679, died, 1682/' His wife died in 1689. He founded an hospital in Sewer-Lane. This hospital contains 12 rooms, and is occupied by 12 poor women, who each receive 2s. 6d. a week, with an allowance of coals and turfs. In 182 1, the sum of ^100 was given by Mr. Daniel Wilson, the representative of the Crowle family, in order that the interest thereof might be paid equally at Christmas among the poor people of the hospital. Mr. Alderman Lambert (Messrs. Lambert, Wine Merchants), and Mr. R. L. Cook, Merchant, are maternal descendants of the family ; the latter gentle- man possesses a splendid life-size portrait, in oil, of this apostle of benevolence, habited in his mayoral robes of office, (annexed is a copy of the original) which I hope \ Alderman Geo. Crowle. (From an original Portrait in tke possession if ffl Cool{.Es