>' -o^-^-^*/ v^^-y V'^^'/ \'^ •-''** *^>.%^ w^- /\ •-^•° *'^ -^^ '•^'' J' \ '-^m' **' ^ • • • * * * A^-^^ * -^^ "^^ .4^^ .. "ov" :j^im^*' ^-^0^ "^^^ffi^'i ^ov^" :^m^\ '-n^-o^ ^^-^K \.. V^^\/ %'^-%o^ ^;'^!^V V w^*' /\ '-^m.' ** % °'^P'" ^'^^'^ ■•^^.- **'" A-^ *'i^J^^ -e ^^bv^ :£M^^\ '^Mc.^ oV^^^^ia'- ^^--.v v^^\/ "-^*^^/ V^^'y % -- V-^^ '0>«b' 1^' .7* .C^ r«' ,A. xO-7\ > • • • - *> V » ' • .'b^'^U,, -J^" t ^^ c^^ ^^SUfe"' ""-^ -^ '^- / o.^-^y ^;??^.;/ V^^°' *-- '« -^^0^ V.^^ -^^ ♦ •-lip:- ^'^'^ "-W*:- /\ •.^- .^'\ ^^p- ^<< V-O^ 'oK 1 ■jflO, IR K ]SI 7*^ R K S OF THE 'CONAUG-HY, SENATOfi FROM ADAMS AND FRANKLIN COUNTIES, OlA THE RESOLUTION ENDORSING THE ACTION OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE IN REINSTATING E. M. STANTON AS SECRETARY OP WAR. r)l::LIVERED JANUARY 21, 1868. Mr. Davis (ot'Be^:ks) having in the course tJf his remarks spoken as follows : '•\V(5 know that sometimes a scavenger must be employed to do dirty work. But it is not customary anionj^; gentlemen to treat Jiim as an equal, much less to eulogize him as a su'jierior being." "This base cruelty, committed by Edwin M. iStanloa, will cling to him living, like tlie poisonoJ shirt, and dying, sink him deeper in iho bottomless pit than ever was sunk an or- dinary murderer." Mr. M'CONAUGHY_. Mr. Speaker, the Senator from Berks [Mr. Davjs] has well said, that, a scavenger is needed when dirty work is to be done. Sir, I will not dispute lliat proposition with him. He has demon- strated it now and here beyond all doubt. Sir, there must be something beneath ^11 this bitter hatred — this malignity v^hich is so in- tense and fearful that it would seem as if it could only have emanated from that being whose presence the Senator summoned into this Chamber, when he endeavored to solve his enigma. The spirit that is here exhibited is so malignant tJiat it could only have emanated from those dejiths in which that spirit of evil, that great prototype and univer- sal symbol of malignity delights to breathe and live. And, sir, to a careful and observ- ant man there is, something deeper than all this, underlying this vidictive ebullition. Why this hatred, why this animosity, why this spirit which in cold blood would strip the skin from the victim from his scalp to his toe ! Sir, it is that spirit which is more dan- gerous to American liberty than 'anything else of which we have ever read or dreamed — the bitter malignity of po- litical hatred. That spirit is more danger- ous to the success of the cause, of republican liberty, than all other adverse inflaences which it has to encounter. When, sir, the future historian comes to write the name of Edwin M. Stanton among the great ones of the age, when he seeks a legend with which to express the character o^ that man, he will inscribe upon his historical monument these words: "This man lovcc; his country more than party." There, sir, i. the solution of the whole question. It is '<■ this they hate him. Sir, go back to 1860, to the epoch when re- bellion threatened and the Government "vni, under the administration of a Democratic President, Mr. Buchanan. Who were his counsellors? Democrats, all. What did they, sir, when the hour of peril came ? Did they stand by the Government? What did his Democratic Secretary of the Treasury, Howell Cobb? He withdrew from his place in the cabinet "on account tif his duty to Georgia." What did his Democratic Minis- ter of War, John B. Floyd? After attempt- ing to rob the Government of the arms for its defense, and thus securing to himself the un iviable epitliet of 'the thief,' he withdrew "because the President declined to order the garrison from the harbor of Charleston alto- gether." Sir, what did the Democratic Attorney Gen- eral, Jeremiah S. Black, of Pennsylvania? He made vacant his office after seeking in a State paper to demonstrate that the Govern- ' ment could not coerce a State in order to crush rebellion and preserve its own existence. Sir, it was at that time that Mr. Buchanan, that poor, miserable, tottering old man at the helm of State, without moral courage enough to stand by the land which gave him birth, and invested him with the highest office in its gift, in his extremity called to his aid that noble and courageous man, Edwin M. Stan- ^^4T ton. He invited him into his cabinet at the recommen'^ation of Judge Black. He came at the summons and stood amid that band of conspirators, like an unwelcome spectre at a council. He told them to their teeth that they were the assassins of liberty, and that he would stand by the Government, let them do as they would. He held up that old man who would have fallen into the yawning gulf of per- dilion which gaped before him, had it not been for the brave and patriotic Stanton. There is one thing about this man's history that must have impressed every intelligent reader of American politics. At the close of Mr. Buchanan's administration, in the mo- ment of imminent danger, he is called into the cabinet alone on account of his pre-emi- nent abilities. All through the administrar tion of Mr. Lincoln he was his chosen and constant trusted counsellor and minister at the head of the department of wdr, both during his first term and his second, until stricken down by the hand of an assassin. And even then, when the apostate reached the Presiden- tial chair, he leaned and relied upon the Sec- retary of War, sir, because of his prominent abilities which, during all these years of war -_j J igj,^ ^g^g ^j. i,^yj^|yjj{^jg important- Ill •, e country. i _Su, wv aeed nothing more than his public bistory, nothing more than the unwilling Iribule from the Buchanan administration, rom the present administration to sig- i— .- . iLc virtues and services of Edwin M. Stanton. Sir, it is because he would not abandon hiscountry, because he stood by the cjuuti-y of his birth and his love in utter disre- gard of his olden party ties ; it is for this reason that gentlemen on the other side of the cham- ber cannot find -language to express their hatred of him. What does the Senator from Berks resort to in his vain ofiort to sustain the bill of indictment which he has brought against him ? He resorts to the irresponsible and ephemeral writings of a nev/spaper cor- respondent. He takes up Mr. Brown, or Mr. Smith, or some other penny-a-liner who is engaged in correspondence v/ith • one of the city dailies— he produces him aS' his solitary witness against the man v/ho, by the devotion of his great talents and years of unceasing labor, has proven his fidelity to the interests of this country, and who has stood through this war a monument of loy- alty and dauntless courage and patriotic de- votion. Sir, there is one cbaracteristicTof Ed- win M. Stanton I admire above all others, and that is, that glorious backbone — that spirit of patriotic resolve— that firm, unflinching bravery — with which he stood, ever fearless and bold, to fight, and fall if need be, battling with the enemies of his country. I was astounded, Mr. Spealcer, that the gentleman should have read what he did in the audience of this Senate. When he was rehearnii)g those deeds of horrid crueJiy, he was reading to us the acts of his frieo-ds — of the members of his own political paJi'ty, the Southern Democracy of this country — the elegant gentlemen of *his country — the aristr*^ cratic Democrats of this land — the men wIW)» have left a blot upon the American character,, which all the waters of the earth cannot w^^shi out. Mr. BURNETT. I desire to ask the gen- tleman one question, if he believes the New ■ York Tribune association would employ the . services of a rebel for its correspondent dur- ing the rebellion ? Mr. M'CONAUGHY. Not consciously, although I have no doubt that it did. But, sir, I believe 1 am not apprehended by the Senator [Mr. Burnett]. I was speaking of the high-toned gentlemen who conducted the rebel prisons of the South; those prisoHpens which have become a part of the history of this rebellion ; those prison pens of which Jefferson Davis, formerly a Democratic United States Senator, and the Democratic Lee, were not unconscious and not unknow- ing ; those prisons, sir, which have stained with infamy the people of the South, who un- dertook to destroy this Republic, and erect upon its ruins a grander government ; one which should have a black foundation and a white pinnacle ; the same party that now iti the North arrogates to itself the classic epi- thet of the White Man's Party. Why, sir, the question involved here is one that ought not to have called for such a tor- rent of defamation upon the Minister of War. As I understand it, the question is simply this : Under the Constitution the President's cabinet advisers are to be appointed with the advice and consent of the Senate. Congres.'s from time to time has made statutory regula- tions for carrying out that provision of the Constitution. The Pi-esident is to nominate- and the Senate is to confirm, if in its judg- meet it can approve. Now, sir, Mr. Johnson undertook to sus- pend Mr. Stanton as Secretary of War from the exercise of his office for reasons which, under the Constitution, he presented as sulH- clent. But the Senate sitting upon the reasons assigned, has pronounced that they were not sufficient. Aiid hence this din and outer)' about a violation of the Constitution by the action of the Senate. Sir, I wish it to be known, when this country was in imminent danger, and when tke issue came whether it should exist or not; when the question was wkether this Republic, in addition to the other excellencies of human governments, had the inherent power which was necessary for its own maintenance againstall enemies, external and internal — when that issue was to be de- cided there was in the Presidential chair a Democratic President. That question arose, and Mr. Buchanan, the then- President, an- fiwered it thns. I read from his message, in December, 1860: "The question fairly stated is, has the Con- stitution delegated to Congress the power to (•oerce a State into submission which has at- tempted to withdraw or has actually with- I drawn from the confederacy. After much seri- ous reflection I have arrived at the conclu- ' sion that no such power has been delegated to Congress, nor to any other department of j the Federal Government." ; Mr. BURNETT, I desire to interrupt { the gentleman. Will the Senator alllow me ! to ask it? Mr. M'CONAUGHY. If it is pertinent j to the question I am discussing i KFf, BURNETT. Did not the New York \ Tribune take the same position ? Mr. M'CONAUGHY. I am not the keeper of the New York Tribune, and I would not be the keeper of the man who became bail for Jefferson Davis. I was attempting to show the position of the Democratic party by the utterances of its President, when this issue was forced upon the country. "After much serious reflection I have arrived at the conclusion that no such l«)wer has been delegated to Congress nor in any other departm^it of the Federal nded tosay. I rose because an honest in- • liguation would not permit me to remain in •ny scat, as it wa;i my wish to to its behests. Men who have had moral courage enough to brave and to endure all this were not the men to ftilter, and to palter in a double sense, when traitors in its coun- cils proposed to destroy this Union. Now, sir, I have simply to conclude with the remark, that, the great, glorious and j.a- triotic heart of the country will uphold tli.i men who fought out this war, both in th. Cabinet and in the iield. But, sir, although they may erect to them a monument, stone upon stone, riaing and swelling in grand and beautiful proportions, until its glorious pin- nacle will even pierce above the clouds, to where eternal sunshine shall rest upon itr, head, yet they cannot prevent the toad and the reptile from leaving their slimc upon its base. 54 ,w ' .0 B .0 A V<^^ ^^.vv'.-'^ >''V;i;i:-.'^.. .vV.;-.*o^ y..--.^ v^^ ^-.^9^' 1^ * Or A° "V'^rt^'W^ O *'"^* ,xO' ''-^ '*eTo'' ■ft^' V _.^^'\. •.' ^^\ "-0 * •y -o * ^^ \ /\ O V , o » • o . » ' ,0 .or ' <• " •