(lass. Hook cn the Colonel's Convention. Delegates to the As- semblv began coming in to Newberne the last week in March, but there was not a quorum on the 27th. The Governor prorogued the Assembly from day to day. Meantime it be- came very obvious that the Assemblymen arriving at New- berne bad almost without exception been chosen by the counties as deputies to Colonel Harvey's Convention. Here was without question a prcblem in practical politics. The Governor knew what he faced. It pleased him, April 2nd, sitting m CoT-n^il, to desire the advice of Council whether he could properly take any further measures (beyond further protest and injunction) to prevent these Assemblymen at Newberne meeting at Newberne in a Convention of their own. This was the polite prologue in Council. And it pleased the Governor, reporting to the Earl of Dartmouth a few days later, to say that he had hoped the Assemblv on what he had to say to it would secede from this Convention ; 'althouf^h I well knew,' added the Governor, 'that many of the members had been sent as deputies to it.' Governor Martin was playing for position, as we say, and not unskil- fullv, en the principle that any man may harangue in the park, but if action follows then let whatever law there is in the premises take steps. As the premises were, Colonel Harvey had the position. This Convention assembled for business on the 3rd. If the Convention could assemble with an ample working quorum, the General Assembly could un- questionably meet. On the 4th it met, and with all the elaborate formalities of custom. So April 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th. representatves of the counties and towns of the province were in assembly at Newberne 'transforming themselves,.* as 1:4 The Texas Review the Governor remarked 'from time to time into a Convention or an Assembly.' Speaker Harvey was Moderator Harvey. Tlie Chair was doubly dignified. The House was energized to new functioning. It is interesting to note that the last Assembly (under the Crown) of North Carolina, sitting by writ under the prerogative, was also a Convention of the people, chosen by the people of their own motion. Dutifully the Governor drew the distinction, recognizing the one body, not recognizing the other. He argued in his address as to the impropriety, the unwisdom of popular assemblies, and of this convention in especial presuming to sit *at this very time and place in the face of the Legislature; whereas you Gentlemen of the Assembly, are the only legal and propei: channel.' The Governor enlarged upon these fine distinc- tions and adverted a little to the Assembly's constituency — he was gratified, he said, at the numerous loyal addresses he had received from certain counties, and spoke of the base arts that must have been employed to stir up the people to frame disloyal utterances. The Assembly in their draft of answer to the Governor 's speech declared : ' It is the undoubted right of his Majesty's subjects to petition for a redress of grievances either in a separate or collective capacity, and in order to agree upon such petition or remonstrance they have a right to collect themselves together. The Assembly there- fore can never deem the meeting of the present Convention at Newberne an illegal meeting nor conceive it derogatory to the power and authority of the Assembly, and though the Assembly are the legal representatives and perhaps adequate to every purpose of the people, yet the frequent prorogations gave the people no reason to expect that the Assembly would be permitted to meet 'til it was too late to send delegates to the Continental Congress at Philadelphia, a measure which Ameica in general and this province in particular thought abso'utely necessary.' The Governor was assured that His Majes'^y had no subjects more loyal than those of North Card na, nor none more ready at the expense of their lives Setting of the Mecklenburg Declaration 25 and fortunes to protect and support His Majesty's person, crown, and dignity. The Assembly spoke of their gratifica- tion in the matter of loj^al addresses received by the Gov- ernor, 'that in so numerous a colony, so few could be found weak enough to be seduced from their duty and prevailed on by base arts and artful measures so contrary to the sense of all America, and so destructive of those just rights and pri- vileges it was their duty to support.' This draft of answer was slightly modified in committee, but the tenor of the an- swer was the same : i. e., — we are good subjects, but if we are to continue so, the King must change the ways of Parlia- ment, so to speak. Assembly expressly endorsed every act of Convention, and approved every act of Convention's three delegates now reappointed to the General Congress. Very solemn fooling such procedure appeared to Alex- ander Elmsly in London. April 7th he was writing to Sam Johnston, 'your politics are past my expectations and out of my reach.' A little earlier he had set down as his opinion, 'it is your numbers and importance that gives you conse- quence and every other argument in your favour teems with absurdity. ' Governor Martin, of course, was at this time standing on difficult ground. The General Assembly was occupying difficult ground and also the Convention. Was the King to permit his subjects in North America to interpret to him and the Parliament the essential nature of the British Constitu- tion? Who was to yield in the large or small business of in- terpretation? And was interpretation comfortably at one throughout the province of North Carolina itself? Andrew Millar, merchant of Halifax, said of the Resolves of the first Newberne Congress: "I am told they were drawn by Mr. Hooper, for whom there was such injusace used by the meeting to get him appointed a delegate [to Philadelphia], that I hope the western countries will pay no share of tha delegate's expenses, as they had no share in the nomi- nation, having only one or two members for a county ana me 2G The Texas Review southern and lower counties had some of them six votes. It is not in character to dispute the power of Parliament, when we say we are nnt represented, and yet quickly submit to so unequal a repre- sentation in a body formed by ourselves." Very true. Mecklenburg, for example, had but one delegate to represent that vast county in the first Newberne Congress (Benjamin Patton, a signer of the Mecklenburg Declaration), whereas Chowan had five delegates, and Onslow three. Mr. jMillar, a Tory of parts, was arguing for the insidious effect, but there was ground of dispute, plenty of it, and there had long been. The Northern Counties, precincts of Old Albe- marle, had the precedence and their representation in the General Assembly had been disproportionately large for many years. The Southern Counties had protested, gover- nors had protested, but nothing had been done. As the more western counties were set off they fell in line with a re- stricted representation. North Carolina came up to the be- ginnings of the Revolution on that footing. Not until the third Provincial Congress, held at Hillsborough, was there attempt made to have the counties represented on an equality. We know that there was a very considerable Tory party in the West. At the height of the war, locally, the Tories raided Hillsborough and carried off the people's Governor. It is not unlikely opinion was a good deal confused in the West dur- ing the spring of 1775. At any rate Anson and Mecklenburg were represented in the first Newberne Congress, and were not represented in the second. Governor Martin had not long before advised government that the ill consequences of the mode of representation in North Carolina had become very apparent to the inhabitants of the Western country^ 'who must be ever governed by the conjunction of the North- ern and Southern interests, although that district is often times their extent and four times more populous.' When Messrs. Hooper, Hewes, and Caswell were chosen as dele- gates to the Continental Congress, the idea seems to have been that Mr. Hewes stood for the Northern counties, Mr. Setting of the Mecklenburg Declaration 27 Hooper for the Southern, and Mr. Caswell for the West. Mr. Caswell lived in Johnston, a sort of compromise county, both North and South, and then he had once been c]erk of Orange Court. At least Governor Martin, con- sidering all these things, could flatter himself April 20, 1775, in the avowed belief that he could count upon the West. The West had been slimly represented in the late Convention. Old Regulators, (whom Tryon had faced, chastened, and dealt fairly with) had just now as- sured his successor of their readiness to support him in maintaining the constitution and laws upon all occasions, 'and I have no doubt that I might command their best services at a word on any emergency. This affords me the highest sat- isfaction, for as these counties are by far the most populous part of the Province, I consider I have the means in my own hands to maintain the sovereignty of this country to my royal master in all events.' It is scarcely possible that Gov- ernor Martin can have been wholly a deluded man. At that juncture of half lights generally. Governor Martin had reason to think that there were many inhabitants of the Western Counties who would not break with the King. But there were men in the West who were willing to break with the King, who wanted new forms of liberty and felt that the time was near come for no uncertain action. At the moment almost, Alexander Elmsly was writing from London, 'They say your seaports are to be turned into garrison towns, and the people of the country left at liberty to form any estab- lishment they think proper.' If that was to be the strategy, then Mecklenburg County, running west to the Cherokee Mountains and beyond at a push, once its people were con- sentaneous might set up independence with no great ado. For what was the Colony of Transylvania about already in the month of May? 'Is Dick Henderson out of his head?', somebody asked Mr. Millar of Halifax. Were not Richard Henderson & Company, of Granville County and that region, setting up a new state in the month of May, Transylvania, 28 The Texas Review in flat contravention of Governor Martin; 'without ^ving offence,' as those Transylvanians blandly asserted, 'without giving offence to Great Britain or any of the American Col- onies, without disturbing the repose of any society or com- munity under Heaven.' It is plain enough now, that that spring and that summer of 1775 was the balancing time. Joseph Hewes, merchant of Edenton, delegate to the General Congress, arrived at Philadelphia May 9th. On the 11th he sent a letter to Sam- uel Johnston who, upon the death of Colonel Harvey in May, became the head of the Whig party in North Carolina, Mr. Hewes in his letter mentioned gossip and outstanding fact, and drew an argument from what he saw. "Galloway," he said, "has turned apostate. A few days ago a box was left at his lodgings in this city directed for Jos. Galloway, Esqr. ; he opened it before several gentlemen then present and was much surprised to find it contained a halter with a note in the?o wicrds, 'All the satisfaction you can now give your injured country is to make a proper use of this and rid the world of a damned scoundrel.' He is gone off nobody can tell where, tho' it is thought to New York. All kinds of business is at a stand here, nothing is heard but the sound of drum and fife, all ranks and degrees of men are in arms learning the manual exercise, evolutions, and management of artillery. . . . All the Quakers except a few of the eld ones have taken up arms. . . . The battle near Boston and the Act of Parliament for restraining the trade of all the colonies except New York and North Carolina has wrought the conversion of New York; I wish to God it may have the same effect on our province. I tremble for N. Carolina. Every county ought to have at least one company formed and exercised. Pray encourage it, speak to the people, write to them, urge strongly the necessity for it. 1 had rather perish ten thousand times than they should give up the matter now in the time of tryal." Governor Martin had reported to Lord Dartmouth, dur- ing the Newberne Congress of April, that a proposal made in Convention on the 6th to organize the militia had been overruled. Government had some show of reason to think that North Carolina and New York might be held as very Setting op the Mecklenburg Declaration 29 useful salients among the Colonies. It was Governor Tryon's idea, and he was familiar with both regions, that manipula- tion there and here might be practicable; he was at the time in London, and in the business of North Carolina was sec- onded by Mr. Elmsly, political agent, who was willing to take a certain liberty with his principals and give them a chance to compound. There is no saying what might have happened unless the tension in Massachusetts Bay had been of a sort to admit of no compromise. The muskets of Lex- ington were heard a long way off. Those men of the western counties in North Carolina, rather far from the depots of overseas trade, living among Tories of all complexions — Thomas Polk and his friends of the West, who had been by the negative record neutral until now, Tom Polk and his friends of Mecklenburg, we say, declared for independence. That was a loosely defined territory. People were not sure where they belonged, whether to South or to North Carolina. Such a territorial status made for independence, honest and dishonest. Men of brains like Polk, the Alexanders, and their friends were saying, 'We might as well set up our own gov- ernment — we are forced to it by all the circumstances — we must have our law courts and we must show these Tories that we are not to be trifled with.' (Pardon us now, a cen- tury after the clever and silly argument began, if we ape Thucydides a little) — Then before the middle of May^ Thomas Polk and his friends heard the shooting and the hard com- mands at Lexington. They met together in convention at their Court House and spoke their thoughts, without any * It is not in rea&on to suppose that news of the battle at Lexing- ton reached Mecklenburg County later than the middle of May. For instance Edmund Fanning wrote a letter to Governor Tryon, dated Hillsborough, April 23, 1768. This letter was received at "Wilmington the night of April 26. Fanning said he expected to receive an answer by three o'clock in the afternoon on Sunday the first of May next. The express with the Lexington news was at Newberne on May 6th. (See North Carolina Records, VII. 713, 715, 719; IX, 1236-1238). 30 The Texas Review polite preamble?. Apparently they had had no Committee of Safety until then : they had been too careless, on whatever grounds, and now they organized a Committee of Safety and got down to the business of running their own affairs. What they did became at once so commonplace, as governmental routine came to be in the West, that nothing was easier from 1819 on than to question their outright common sense, cor- nered as they were around the middle of May '75. Those Mecklenburg men were speaking out, not only to Governor Martin and his principals, but to the managers of the Whig party. At any rate, in the third Provincial Congress, at Hillsborough in August, there was a flat equality of repre- sentation among the counties. Mecklenburg had six dele- gates, all new men in these new Provincial affairs, and four of them had signed the Declaration in May. Governor Mar- tin had been immensely impressed. His line of communica- tions was more open towards the sea, and he retired to Fort Johnston, at the mouth of the Cape Fear, early in June. Sending a dispatch thence to the Earl of Dartmouth on the 30th he said, 'the Resolves of the Committee of Meckenburg, which your Lordship will find in the enclosed newspaper, sur- pass all the horrid and treasonable publications that the in- flammatory spirits of this continent have yet produced.' In July the Governor thought it well to look further to his line of communications, and withdrew to H. M. Sloop Cruizer in River Cape Fear. There on the 18th he held a meeting of his Council, when Mr. President Hasell gave it as his opinion that 'His Excellency should take every law^ful measure in his power to suppress the unnatural rebellion now fomenting in Mecklenburg and other parts of the province to overturn the Constitution and his just prerogative.' Mecklenburg County, by getting down to the essential busi- ness of the time, had unquestionably made itself rather con- spicuous. But neither the country nor North Carolina was yet ready to go all lengths. July 6th the Congress at Phila- delphia addressed the Inhabitants of Great Britain in a very Setting of the Mecklenburg Declaration 31 conciliatory manner. July 8tTi the Congress at Philadelphia petitioned the throne in a most conciliatory manner. Pat- rick Henry and his fellows signed their names to such pacific paragraphs as, "For such arrangements as your Majesty's wisdom can form, for collecting the united sense of your American people, we are convinced your Majesty would re- ceive such satisfactory proofs of the disposition of the colon- ists toward their sovereign and parent state that the wished for opportunity would soon be restored to them of evincing the sincerity of their professions by every testimony of de- votion becoming the most dutiful subjects and the most affectionate colonists." July 10th four ministers of Phila- delphia addressed the Presbyterians of North Carolina (Mecklenburg was for Presbytery) — "Believe no man that dares to say we desire to be independent of our mother country." Mr. Hooper and Mr. Hewes had affixed their names just below that of Mr. Jefferson to the Petition to the Throne of July 8th, yet on the same day Mr. Hewes wrote to Samuel Johnston (head of the North Carolina Whigs, but very much a conservative) "I consider myself now over head and ears in what the Ministry call Rebellion." Were not these mixed affairs? Who can know clearly what he is doing when he breaks with his old government? And so the Con- gress of Hillsborough, (August and September, 1775), that armed the province, was willing to endorse an address to the Inhabitants of the British Empire, Mr. Hooper's work, in which Mr. Hooper said, "We have been told that inde- pendence is our object: that we seek to shake off all connec- tion with the parent state. Cruel suggestion ! Do not all our professions, all our actions uniformly contradict this?" Mr. Hooper went even beyond the General Congress and said it was the desire of North Carolina to be restored to its con- dition of the early part of the year 1763. Those delegates from Mecklenburg who had signed the Meckenburg Declara- tion, (Messrs. Polk, Alexander, Avery, and Phifer), signed Mr. Hooper's address, just as Mr. Henry and Mr. Jefferson 32 The Texas Review had sigmed John Dickinson's address. The Mecklenburg del- egates knew at least that they represented a vast county that was, and had advertised itself as being, a self-governing ter- ritory. And exactly when were drawn up the remarkable Instructions for the Delegates of Mecklenburg County (quite as remarkable as the Declaration) beginning "you are in- structed to vote that the late province of North Carolina is and of right ought to be a free and independent state invested with all the power of legislation capable of making laws to regulate all its internal policy subject only in its external connections and foreign commerce to a negative of a conti- nental Senate — you are instructed to vote for the erection of a civil government under the authority of the people for the future security of all the rights, privileges and preroga- tives of the state and the private natural and unalienable rights of the constituting members thereof either as men or Christians. If this should not be confirmed in Congress or Convention — protest. ' ' There were declarations being made within the province of North Carolina and up and down the coastal plain that amazed Governor Martin. Patiently keeping open his line of communications, on board the Cruizer sloop of war, he was afforded opportunity to reflect at large upon politics, wis- dom, war, and other things. In October he wrote to the Earl of Dartmouth, who was also nearing his end as an American official. "I have now and then, my Lord, the heart breaking pain to hear the murmurings and lamentations of a loyal subject who^ steals down here to unbosom his griefs, to complain of the want of sup- port from government, and to enquire when it may be expected. And while I labour to console and encourage him under his suf- fering's, I am doubly sensible of my own impotent and disg-aceful condition and circumstances, my feel'ngs of which and for the dig- nity of his Majesty's government it is impossible for me to express or describe." ^l^ortlx Carolina Records, X. 239. Setting of the Mecklenburg DeclxVration 33 The Governor (in partibus) gave his chief a very interest- ing and very discerning account of the doings in Congress, both at Philadelphia and at Hillsborough. He was amazed and puzzled at the political force and skill of these men— 'Heaven knows what are the views of them at large! It is nevertheless far from me and my intentions to judge them. I for my part deplore most sincerely the unnatural subsisting contest, and most devoutly pray for a just, constitutional, honorable and speedy termination of it.' And then Josiah Martin wrote off the wisest words he ever used — 'The restraints of trade that have been highly expedient, proper, and necessary, will doubtless by slow operation produce effect in time, if foreign states and foreign wars do not interpose, but they will never cure the instant and fatal growing distemper of rebellion or alter the principle of it, nor do they promise to be the means of conciliating the affections of this people. And whatever measures the wisdom of government shall employ for reducing the colony to present obedience, the more pleasing task of reconciling them to it lastingly, as I humbly and perhaps ignorantly conceive, will be ac- complished only by some great act of State, deciding all claims with precision and settling a permanent and just system of political relation and dependance between the parent state and her colonies, that will be an immense and glorious work but pregnant with difficulties, many of which it is probable my short sight, [nor as we know, the sight of William Legge, Earl of Dartmouth], does not comprehend.' What a commentary — is not that a commentary? — upon wisdom and politics! WHY DO WE LAUGH AT FALSTAFF? By Thomas Vernor Smith J- If yon will,, immediately after enjoying a heart/ laugh, serionsly proposal to yourself the question, now precisely why did I larph? yrn^ill find yonrself confronted 1^^ a question which in its subtlery, has interested all and baffled many of the world's greatest i^khilosophers. Laught§^ itself is, of course, ensy, indeed alnr^st gratuitous; bu^ its explnnation is from every viewpoint diff%ilt. I have a,^riend, for instance, who has spent several monl-'hs in an ^ort, not this time to explain the comic, but only %J;o eliififeify humor upon some logical basis. But even in thf^ fysj^^erficial task he tells me that he has utterly failed. Your%ill see, therefore, that the question of the comic both in jiterature and in liie is worthy of the best efforts of the j^enest rainds. For the purpose of the present inquiry it/%iakes no difference whether the question be put. Why \d Falstaff funny? or Why do we laugh at Falstaff? To/ask the question in either form is in reality to inquire wkat is the comic in human experience. You will see, then, , that I propose not so much to set forth an interpretation /f the character Falstaff as to enunciate a theory of the coisfiic, or rather to amplify and apply a theory of the comic ajti'eady enunciated by the French philosopher, Henri Bergso^. It happens that Falstaff' is the best personality in English ^^terature upon which to hang the object lesson; first, becavfse he is the funniest character in our literature, and, sec'6ndly, because he, through his association with Shakespeare's Prince Henry, is already used to being made a tool. I \ f In good earnest, then, I submit the question, — Why is Falstaff funny ? Falstaff is funny, 'first, because he is humanV, B113-1019-400-2741 The Texas Review VOL. V. OCTOBER, 1919. No. 1 Entered as second-class matter June 7, 1915, at the postoffice at Austin, Texas, under the Act of March 3, 1879. EDITOR, Robert Adger Law. MANAGING EDITOR, E. M. Clark. ADVISORY EDITORS: Lilia M. Casis, Howard Mnmford Jones, Edwin W. Fay, Thad W. Riker, G. Watts Cunningham, James Finch Roystor. CONTENTS OF THE OCTOBER NUMBER October's Child Mrs. W. 8. Hendrix 1 The Seeker Robert Calvin WMtford 2 King Arthur's Return WiUia7n Dyer Moore 5 Mr. Alfred Noyes and the Literary Rebels James Finch Royster 10 etting of the Mecklenburg Declaration of Independence A. J. Morrison 15 Why Do We Laugh at Falstaff ? . . Thomas Vernor Smith 34 Humanism and the Modern Spirit. Perct/ Hazen Houston 49 An Irish Mme. de Stael Benjamin M. Woodhridge 70 The Pump Room — On Razor Straps Charles R. Lingley 84 CONTRIBUTORS TO THIS NUMBER Mrs, W. S. Hendrix, of Austin, Texas, has written many verses for the Review. Robert Calvin Whitford is assistant professor of English in Knox Collegre, Illinois. WiLiiiAM Dyer Moore is teaching in the Brackenridge High School of San Antonio, James Pinch Royster is professor of English in the Uni- versity of Texas. A, J. Morrison of Hampden-Sidney, Virginia, wrote "Four Revolntions and Virginia Education" for the Beview in January, 1919, Thomas Vernor Smith, recently of the faculty of Texas Christian University, is now Oldright fellow in philosophy in the University of Texas. Percy Hazen Houston, first managing editor of the Texas Review, now of the English department of the United States Naval Academy, Annapolis, wrote "Winds of Doctrine" in the April Review. Benjamin Mather Woodbridge, associate professor of French in Rice Institute, Texas, contributed "Benjamin Con- stant's Adolpha" to the Review of October, 1916, Charles R. Lingley, assistant professor of history in Dart- mouth College, New Hampshire, wrote "Public Opinion and the Third Term Tradition" for the Review of April, 1916. o?v / OCTOBER, 1919 THE TEXAS REVIEW PUBLISHED QUARTERLY BY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS $2.00 a Year 50 cent» a Copy Vol. V, No. 1