Types of Naval Officers Works by Captain A. T*. Mahan. The Influence of Sea Power upon History. 1660-1783. The Influence of Sea Power upon the French Revolution and Empire. Two vols. The Life of Nelson, the Embodiment of the Sea Power of Great Britain. Two vols The Life of Nelson. Popular edition. One vol. The Interest of America in Sea Power, Present and Future. Lessons of the War with Spain, and Other Articles. The Problem of Asia and its Effect upon International Policies. Types of Naval Officers, with Some Remarks ON THE Development of Naval Warfare DURING THE EIGHTEENTH CeNTURY. \ Edward, Lord Hawke, Types 0/ Naval Officers Drawn from the History of the British Navy With Some Account of the Conditions of Naval Warfare at the beginning of the Eighteenth Century^ and of its subsequent develop- ment during the Sail Period A> rrMahan, D.C.L., LL.D. Captain, United States Na s ^ -D T3 o r c ttf > ^ 5 en ^ TJ 5 ^ a X) 1-" CJ <= -•= VS 3 u- a D. U- OQ Q. Ul un i^- CD lT ^ y- ♦ o L.' CD of the Eighteenth Century 49 passing ahead, they hove-to with their main- topsails aback, — stopped, — awaiting the attack, which was thenceforth inevitable and close at hand. In consequence of what has been stated, the British Hne (B2 — B3) — more properly, column — was passing ahead of the French (F2 — F3), steer- ing towards their rear, in a direction in a general sense opposite to theirs, but not parallel ; that is, the British course made an angle, of between thirty and forty-five degrees, with the line on which their enemy was ranged. Hence, barring orders to the contrary, — which were not given, — each British ship was at its nearest to the enemy as she passed their van, and became more and more distant as she drew to the rear. It would have been impossible to realize more exactly the post- ulate of the 17th Article of the Fighting Instructions, which in itself voiced the ideal con- ditions of an advantageous naval position for attack, as conceived by the average ofificer of the day; and, as though most effectually to demonstrate once for all how that sort of thing would work, the adjunct circumstances approached perfection. The admiral was thor- oughly wedded to the old system, without an idea of departing from it, and there was a fair working breeze with which to give it effect, for the ships under topsails and foresail would go about three knots ; with top-gallant sails, per- haps over four. A fifty-gun ship, about the 4 50 Naval Warfare at the Beginning middle of the engagement, had to close her lower deck ports when she set her top-gallant sails on the wind, which had then freshened a little. The 1 7th Article read thus : " If the admiral see the enemy standing towards him, and he has the wind of them, the van of the fleet is to make sail till they come the length of the enemy's rear, and our rear abreast of the enemy's van ; then he that is in the rear of our fleet is to tack first, and every ship one after another as fast as they can throughout the whole line; and if the admiral will have the whole fleet to tack together, the sooner to put them in a posture of engaging the enemy, he will hoist " a prescribed signal, " and fire a gun; and whilst they are in fight with the enemy the ships will keep at half a cable's length — one hundred yards — one of the other." All this Byng aimed to do. The conditions ex- actly fitted, and he exactly followed the rules, with one or two slight exceptions, which will appear, and for which the Court duly censured him. When thus much had been done, the 19th Article in turn found its postulate realized, and laid down its corresponding instruction : " If the admiral and his fleet have the wind of the enemy, and they have stretched themselves in a line of battle, the van of the admiral's fleet is to steer with the van of the enemy's, and there to engage with them." The precise force of the Eighteenth Century 51 of " steer with " is not immediately apparent to us to-day, nor does it seem to have been perfectly clear then ; for the question was put to the captain of the flag-ship, — the heroic Gardiner, " You have been asked if the admiral did not express some uneasiness at Captain Andrews " — of the van ship in the action — " not seeming to understand the 19th Article of the Fighting Instructions ; Do not you understand that article to relate to our van particularly when the two fleets are [already] in a parallel line of battle to each other ? " (As TT, F3). A7iswer : " I appre- hended it in the situation " [not parallel] " we were in^ if the word For were instead of the word With, he would, I apprehend, have steered directly for the van ship of the Enemy." Question. " As the 19th Article expresses to steer with the van of the enemy, if the leading ship had done so, in the oblique hne we were in with the enemy, and every ship had observed it the same, would it not have prevented our rear coming to action at all, at least within a proper distance ? " Answer: "Rear, and van too." "Steer with" therefore meant, to the Court and to Gardiner, to steer parallel to the enemy, — possibly like- wise abreast, — and if the fleets were already parallel the instruction would work ; but neither the articles themselves, nor Byng by his signals, did anything to effect parallelism before making the signal to engage. 1 This wording and punctuation is exact from the text. 52 Naval Warfare at the Beginning The captain of the ship sternmost in passing, which became the van when the fleet tacked together according to the Instructions and signals, evidently shared Gardiner's impression ; when about, he steered parallel to — " with " — the French, who had the wind nearly abeam. The mischief was that the ships ahead of him in passing were successively more and more distant from the enemy, and if they too, after tacking, steered with the latter, they would never get any nearer. The impasse is clear. Other measures doubtless would enable an admiral to range his fleet parallel to the enemy at any chosen distance, by taking a position himself and forming the fleet on his ship ; or, in this particu- lar instance, Byng being with the van as it, on the starboard tack, was passing the enemy (B3 B3), could at any moment have brought his fleet parallel to the French by signalling the then van ship to keep away a certain amount, the rest following in her wake. Nothing to that effect being in the Instructions, it seems not to have occurred to him. His one idea was to conform to them, and he apprehended that after tacking, as they prescribed, the new van ship would bear down and engage without further orders, keeping parallel to the French when within point-blank, the others following her as they could ; a process which, from the varying distances, would expose each to a con- centrated fire as they successively approached. of the Eighteenth Century ^2 Byng's action is only explicable to the writer by supposing that he thus by " steer with " understood " steer for ; " for when, after the fleet tacked together, the new van ship (formerly the rear) did not of her own motion head for the leading enemy, he signalled her to steer one point, and then two points, in that direction. This, he explained in his defence, was " to put the leading captain in mind of his Instructions, who I perceived did not steer away with the enemy's leading ship agreeable to the 19th Arti- cle of the Fighting Instructions." The results of these orders not answering his expectations, he then made the signal to engage, as the only remaining way perceptible to him for carrying out the Instructions. To summarize the foregoing, up to the moment the signal for battle was made : While the fleets were striving for the weather gage, the wind had shifted to the southwest. The French, momenta- rily disordered by the change, had formed in line ahead about noon, heading northwest, westerly, so as just to keep their main topsails aback and the ships with bare steerage way, but under command (F3). The British standing south-southeast, by the wind, were passing (B2— B3) across the head of the enemy's fleet at a distance of from three to two miles — the latter being the estimate by their ships then in the rear. The French having twelve vessels in line and the British thirteen, the gradual progress of the latter should bring their 54 Naval Warfare at the Beginning then van " the length of the enemy's rear," about the time the rear came abreast of his van. When this happened, the Instructions required that the fleet tack together, and then stand for the enemy, ship to ship, number one to number one, and so along: the line till the number twelves met/ This Byng purposed to do, but, unluckily for himself, ventured on a refinement. Considering that, if his vessels bore down when abreast their respective antagonists, they would go bows-on, perpendicularly, subject to a raking — enfilading — fire, he deferred the signal to tack till his van had passed some distance beyond the French rear, because thus they would have to approach in a slanting direction. He left out of his account here the fact that all long columns tend to straggle in the rear ; hence, although he waited till his three or four leading ships had passed the enemy before making signal to tack, the rear had got no farther than abreast the hostile van. Two of the clearest witnesses, Baird of the Portland, next to the then rear ship, and Cornwall of the Revenge, seventh from it, testified that, after tacking together, to the port tack, when they kept away for the enemy in obedience to the signal for battle, it was necessary, in order to reach their particular opponents, to bring the wind not only as far as astern, but on the starboard quarter, 1 So far was literalism carried, that, before the signal for battle, Byng evened numbers with his opponent by directing his weakest ship to leave the line, with no other orders than to be ready to take the place of a disabled vessel. of the Eighteenth Century ^^ showing that they had been in rear of their sta- tion before tacking, and so too far ahead after it ; while Durell of the Trident, ninth from rear and therefore fifth from van, asserted that at the same moment the British van, which after tacking became the rear, had overpassed the enemy by five or six ships. This may be an exaggeration, but that three or four vessels had gone beyond is proved by evidence from the ships at that end of the line. The Court therefore distinctly censured the admiral for this novelty: "Unanimously, the Court are of opinion that when the British fleet on the starboard tack were stretched abreast, or about the beam of the enemy's line, the admiral should have tacked the fleet all together, and immediately have conducted it on a direct course for the enemy, the van steering for the enemy's van," etc. The instructive point, however, is not Byng's variation, nor the Court's censure, but the idea, common to both, that the one and only way to use your dozen ships under the conditions was to send each against a separate antagonist. The highest and authoritative conception of a fleet action was thus a dozen naval duels, occurring simultaneously, under initial conditions unfavor- able to the assailant. It is almost needless to remark that this is as contrary to universal mili- tary teaching as it was to the practice of Rodney, Howe, Jervis, and Nelson, a generation or two later. 56 Naval Warfare at the Beginning This is, in fact, the chief significance of this action, which ratified and in a measure closed the effete system to which the middle eighteenth century had degraded the erroneous, but com- paratively hearty, tradition received by it from the seventeenth. It is true, the same blunder- ing method was illustrated in the War of 1778. Arbuthnot and Graves, captains when Byng was tried, followed his plan in 1781, with like dem- onstration of practical disaster attending false theory; but, while the tactical inefficiency was little less, the evidence of faint-hearted profes- sional incompetency, of utter personal inade- quacy, was at least not so glaring. It is the combination of the two in the person of the same commander that has given to this action its pitiful pre-eminence in the naval annals of the century. It is, therefore, not so much to point out the lesson, as to reinforce its teaching by the exem- plification of the practical results, that there is advantage in tracing the sequel of events in this battle. The signal to tack was made when the British van had reached beyond the enemy's rear, at a very little after i p.m. (B3). This re- versed the line of battle, the rear becoming the van, on the port tack. When done, the new van was about two miles from that of the French (F4) ; the new rear, in which Byng was fourth from sternmost, was three and a half or four from their rear. Between this and 2 p. m. of the Eighteenth Century 57 came the signals for the ship then leading to keep two points, twenty-five degrees, more to starboard, — towards the enemy; a measure which could only have the bad effect of increasing the angle which the British line already made with that of the French, and the consequent inequality of distance to be traversed by their vessels in reach- ing their opponents. At 2.20 the signal for battle was made, and was repeated by the second in command. Rear- Admiral Temple West, who was in the fourth ship from the van. His division of six bore up at once and ran straight down before the wind, under topsails only, for their several antagonists; the sole exception being the van- most vessel, which took the slanting direction desired by Byng, with the consequence that she got ahead of her position, had to back and to wear to regain it, and was worse punished than any of her comrades. The others engaged in line, within point-blank, the rear-admiral hoisting the flag for close action (B4). Fifteen minutes later, the sixth ship, and rearm.ost of the van, the Intrepid, lost her fore topmast, which crippled her. The seventh ship, which was the leader of the rear, Byng's own division, got out of his hands before he could hold her. Her captain, Frederick Cornwall, was nephew to the gallant fellow who fell backing Mathews so nobly off Toulon, and had then succeeded to the command of the Marl-- borough, fighting her till himself disabled. He 58 Naval Warfare at the Beginning had to bring the wind on the starboard quarter of his little sixty-four, in order to reach the sev- enth in the enemy's line, which was an eighty-gun ship, carrying the flag of the French admiral. This post, by professional etiquette, as by evident military considerations, Byng owed to his own flag-ship, of equal force. The rest of the rear division the commander- in-chief attempted to carry with himself, slanting down ; or, as the naval term then had it, " lask- ing " towards the enemy. The flag-ship kept away four points — forty-five degrees ; but hardly had she started, under the very moderate canvas of topsails and foresail, to cover the much greater distance to be travelled, in order to support the van by engaging the enemy's rear, when Byng observed that the two ships on his left — towards the van — were not keeping pace with him. He ordered the main and mizzen topsails to be backed to wait for them. Gardiner, the captain, " took the liberty of offering the opinion " that, if sail were increased instead of reduced, the ships con- cerned would take the hint, that they would all be sooner alongside the enemy, and probably receive less damage in going down. It was a question of example. The admiral replied, "You see that the signal for the line is out, and I am ahead of those two ships ; and you would not have me, as admiral of the fleet, run down as if I was going to engage a single ship. It was Mr. Mathews's misfortune to be prejudiced by not of the Eighteenth Century 59 carrying his force down together, which I shall endeavor to avoid." Gardiner again " took the lib- erty " of saying he w^ould answer for one of the two captains doing his duty. The incident, up to the ship gathering way again, occupied less than ten minutes ; but with the van going down headlong — as it ought — one ceases to wonder at the impression on the public produced by one who preferred lagging for laggards to hastening to support the forward, and that the populace sus- pected something worse than pedantry in such reasoning at such a moment. When way was resumed, it was again under the very leisurely canvas of topsails and foresail. By this had occurred the incident of the In- trepid losing her foretopmast. It was an ordinary casualty of battle, and one to be expected ; but to such a temper as Byng's, and under the cast-iron regulations of the Instructions, it entailed consequences fatal to success in the action, — if success were ever attainable under such a method, — and was ultimately fatal to the admiral himself. The wreck of the fallen mast was cleared, and the foresail set to maintain speed, but, despite all, the Intrepid dropped astern in the line. Cornwall in the Revenue was taking his place at the moment, and fearing that the Intrepid would come back upon him, if in her wake, he brought up first a little to windward, on her quarter; then, thinking that she was holding her way, he bore up again. 6o Naval Warfare at the Beginning At this particular instant he looked behind, and saw the admiral and other ships a considerable distance astern and to windward ; much Les- tock's position in Mathews's action. This was the stoppage already mentioned, to wait for the two other ships. Had Cornwall been Burrish, he might in this have seen occasion for waiting himself; but he saw rather the need of the crippled ship. The Revenge took position on the Intrepid' s lee quarter, to support her against the enemy's fire, concentrated on her when her mast was seen to fall. As her way slackened, the Revenge approached her, and about fifteen minutes later the ship following, the Princess Louisa, — one of those for which Byng had waited, — loomed up close behind Cornwall, who expected her to run him on board, her braces being shot away. She managed, however, with the helm to back her sails, and dropped clear; but in so doing got in the way of the vessel next after her, the Trident, which immediately preceded Byng. The captain of the Trident, slanting down with the rest of the division, saw the situation, put his helm up, ran under the stern of the Louisa, passed on her lee side, — nearest the enemy, — and ranged up behind the Revenge; but in doing this he not only crossed the stern of the Louisa, but the bow of the admiral's ship — the Ramillies. Under proper management the Ramillies doubtless could have done just what the Trident of the Eighteenth Century 6i did, — keep away with the helm, till the ships ahead of her were cleared ; she would be at least hasting towards the enemy. But the noise of battle was in the air, and the crew of the Ramillies began to fire without orders, at an improper distance. The admiral permitted them to continue, and the smoke enveloping the ship prevented fully noting the incidents just nar- rated. It was, however, seen before the firing that the Louisa was come up into the wind with her topsails shaking, and the Trident pass- ing her to leeward. There should, therefore, have been some preparation of mind for the fact suddenly reported to the admiral, by a military passenger on the quarter deck, that a British ship was close aboard, on the lee bow. It was the Trident that had crossed from wind- ward to leeward for the reasons given, and an instant later the Louisa was seen on the weather bow. Instead of keeping off, as the Trident had done, the admiral ordered the foresail hauled up, the helm down, lufied the ship to the wind, and braced the foretopsail sharp aback ; . the effect of which was first to stop her way, and then to pay her head off to leeward, clear of the two vessels. About quarter of an hour elapsed, by Captain Gardiner's evidence, from the time that the Ramillies s head pointed clear of the Trident and Louisa before sail was again made to go forward to aid the van. The battle was already lost, and in fact had passed out 62 Naval Warfare at the Beginning of Byng's control, owing to his previous action ; nevertheless this further delay, though probably due only to the importance attached by the admiral to regularity of movement, had a dis- creditable appearance. The Court held that the admiral was justified in not trying to go to leeward of the two ships, under the circumstances when they were seen; but blamed him for permitting the useless can- nonade which prevented seeing them sooner. The results at this moment in other parts of the field should be summarized, as they show both the cause and the character of the failures due to faulty management. The five ships of the British van had already seen their adversaries withdraw after a sharp engagement. This seems to have been due to the fact that two were individually overmatched and driven off; whereupon the other three retired because unable to contend with five. But no support reached the British van at this important moment ; on the contrary, the British rear was now two or three miles distant, astern and to windward. The lagging of the crippled Intrepid held back the Revenge, Corn- wall was detained some time by the old idea that he needed a signal to pass her, because to do so was breaking the order established by the admiral ; but concluding at last that Byng was unaware of the conditions, and seeing that his immediate opponent — the French admiral of the Eighteenth Century 63 — was drawing ahead, he sent word to the Intrepid to hold her fire for a few moments till he could go by. He then made sail. The French rear with its commander-in-chief had been watching the incidents narrated : the crippling of the Intrepid, the consequent disorder in the British rear, and the increasing distance between it and the van. When the Revenge, however, passed ahead, and Byng disentangled his flag-ship, the moment for a decisive step arrived. The French rear vessels were nearer the British van than Byng's division was. They now filled their topsails, made more sail, stood for the British leading ships, already partially unrigged, passed by, and in so doing gave them the fire of a number of substantially fresh vessels, which had undergone only a distant and ineffec- tive cannonade. Byng saw what was about to happen, and also set more canvas ; but it was no longer possible to retrieve the preceding errors. The French admiral had it in his power very seriously to damage, if not to destroy the hostile van ; but in accordance with the tradition of his nation he played an over-prudent game, strictly defensive, and kept too far off. After exchang- ing distant broadsides, he steered northwest to- wards Mahon, satisfied that he had for the time disabled his opponent. The British that eve- ning tacked off-shore and stood to the southeast. Four days later they abandoned the field, return- ing to Gibraltar. The fall of Minorca followed. 64 Naval Warfare at the Beginning Nothing could have been much worse than the deplorable management of this action on the part of the commander-in-chief. It is a conspicuous instance of weak and halting execution, superim- posed upon a professional conception radically erroneous ; and it reflected throughout the timid hesitancy of spirit which dictated the return to Gibraltar, under the always doubtful sanction of a Council of War. But the historical value of the lesson is diminished if attention is confined to the shortcomings of the admiral, neglectful of the fact that his views as to the necessity to observe the routine of the Fighting Instruc- tions are reproduced in the evidence of the captains ; and that the finding of the Court censures, not the general idea, but certain details, important yet secondary. Durell, being asked whether the admiral could not have passed under the stern of the Trident, as the Trident had under that of the Louisa, replies, " Yes, but she would have been to leeward of those ships ahead ; " that is, to leeward of the line. Gar- diner "knows no other method than what the admiral took, for preserving the line regular." Cornwall cannot pass the Intrepid without a signal, because it would be breaking the order. These were all good men. The Court, composed of four admirals and nine captains, the junior of whom had over ten years seniority, give in their finding no shadow of disapproval to the broad outlines of the action. of the Eighteenth Century 6^ There can be, therefore, no doubt about service standards. The questions put to the witnesses reveal indeed a distinct preference for forming the line of battle parallel to that of the enemy before bearing down, so that all the ships may have the same distance to go, have a clear field ahead of each, and the comparatively simple mutual bearing of "abeam" to observe; but it refrains from censuring the admiral for forming on a line very oblique to that of the enemy, which entailed the burden of changing the rela- tive positions during standing down, so as to arrive all together, on a line parallel to his ; while the course itself being oblique alike to their own front and the enemy's, each preceding ship was liable to get in the way, " to prove an impedi- ment," to its follower, — as actually happened. It was indeed impossible to fault the commander- in-chief in this particular, because his action was conformable to the letter of the Instructions, with which he was evidently and subserviently eager to comply. The decision of the Court therefore was, in substance, that in bearing down upon the enemy Byng did not do wrong in starting upon a line oblique to them ; but that he should have steered such a course, and maintained such spread of sail, graduated to the speed of the slowest ship in the fleet, that all should reach point-blank range at the same time, and be then ranged on a line parallel to that of the enemy. " When on 5 66 Naval Warfare at the Beginning the starboard tack, the admiral should have tacked the fleet all together and immediately con- ducted it on a direct course for the enemy; . . . each ship steering for her opposite ship in the enemy's line, and under such sail as might have enabled the worst sailing ship, under all her plain sail, to preserve her station." It is needless to insist with any naval man, or to any soldier, that such an advance, in orderly fashion, oblique to the front, is unattainable except by long drill, while this fleet had been but a few weeks assem- bled; and the diiflculty is enhanced when each ship has not only to keep its station in line, but to reach a particular enemy, who may not be just where he ought, having respect to the British order. The manoeuvre favored by the Court for the fleet as a whole was in fact just that which Byng attempted for his own division, with the results that have been narrated. These were aggravated by his mismanagement, but did not originate from it. The invariable result of an attack thus at- tempted, however vigorously made, was that the van of the assailant got into action first, receiving the brunt of the enemy's fire without proper sup- port. Not infrequently, it also underwent a second hammering from the enemy's rear, pre- cisely in the same way as occurred in Byng's action ; and whether this happened or not de- pended more upon the enemy than upon the British rear. In ignoring, therefore, the idea of of the Eighteenth Century 67 combining an attack in superior numbers upon a part of the enemy, and adopting instead that of an onslaught upon his whole, all along the line, the British practice of the eighteenth century not only surrendered the advantage which the initiative has, of effecting a concentration, but subjected their own fleets to being beaten in detail, subject only to the skill of the opponent in using the opportunity extended to him. The results, at best, were indecisive, tactically con- sidered. The one apparent exception was in June, 1794, when Lord Howe, after long vainly endeavoring a better combination with a yet raw fleet, found himself forced to the old method ; but although then several ships were captured, this issue seems attributable chiefly to the con- dition of the French Navy, greatly fallen through circumstances foreign to the present subject. It was with this system that Rodney was about to break, the first of his century formally to do so. A false tactical standard, however, was not the only drawback under which the British Navy labored in 1739. The prolonged series of wars, which began when the establishment of civil order under Cromwell permitted the nation to turn from internal strife to external interests, had been for England chiefly maritime. They had recurred at brief intervals, and had been of such duration as to insure a continuity of experience and development. Usage received modification under the influence of constant warlike practice, 68 Naval Warfare at the Beginning and the consequent changes in methods, if not always thoroughly reasoned, at the least reflected a similar process of professional advance in the officers of the service. This was consecutively transmitted, and by the movement of actual war was prevented from stagnating and hardening into an accepted finality. Thus the service and its officers, in the full performance of their func- tions, were alive and growing. Nor was this all. The same surroundings that promoted this healthful evolution applied also a continual test of fitness to persons. As each war began, there were still to be found in the prime of vigor and usefulness men whose efficiency had been proved in its predecessor, and thus the line of sustained ability in leadership was carried on from one naval generation to another, through the sixty- odd years, 165 2-1 7 13, over which these condi- tions extended. The peace of Utrecht in 171 3 put an end to this period. A disputed succession after the death of Queen Anne, in 1714, renewed the condi- tion of internal disquietude which had paralyzed the external action of England under Charles I.; and this co-operated with the mere weariness of war, occasioned by prolonged strife, to give both the country and the navy a temporary distaste to further military activity. The man of the occa- sion, who became the exponent and maintainer of this national inclination, was Sir Robert Wal- pole ; to whom, during his ministry of over twenty of the Eighteenth Century 69 years, can fairly be applied Jefferson's phrase concerning himself, that his "passion was peace." But, whatever the necessity to the country of such a policy, it too often results, as it did in both these cases, in neglect of the military services, allowing the equipment to decay, and tending to sap the professional interest and competency of the officers. From this last evil the United States Navy in Jefferson's day was saved by the simple fact that the officers were young men, or at the most in the early prime of life, — the Navy itself, in 181 2, being less than twenty years old as a corporate organization. The British Navy of 1739 was in very different case. For a quarter of a century the only important military occurrence had been the Battle of Cape Passaro, in 1718, where the British fleet in a running fight destroyed a much inferior Spanish force ; and the occasion then was not one of existent war, but of casual hostili- ties, which, precipitated by political conditions, began and ended with the particular incident, as far as the sea was concerned. Back of this lay only Malaga, in 1 704 ; for the remaining years of war, up to 1 713, had been unmarked by fleet battles. The tendency of this want of experience, followed by the long period — not of peace only, but — of professional depression resultant upon inactivity and national neglect, was to stagna- tion, to obviate which no provision existed or was attempted. Self-improvement was not a note of ^n 70 Naval Warfare at the Beginning the service, nor of the times. The stimulus of occupation and the corrective of experience being removed, average men stuck where they were, and grew old in a routine of service, or, what was perhaps worse, out of the service in all but name. In naval warfare, the Battle of Malaga, the last point of performance, remained the example, and the Fighting Instructions the passively accepted authority. The men at the head of the Navy, to whom the country naturally looked, either had no record — no proof of fitness — because but youths in the last war, or else, in simple consequence of having then had a chance to show themselves, were now superannuated. This very fact, how- ever, had the singular and unfortunate result that, because the officers of reputation were old, men argued, by a curious perversion of thought, that none but the old should be trusted. Of this two significant cases will tell more than many words. Mathews, who commanded at Toulon in 1744, was then sixty-seven years old, and had not been at sea between 1724 and 1742. Hawke, in 1747, when he had already established an excellent reputation as a captain, and for enter- prise in recent battle, was thought young to be entrusted with a squadron of a dozen ships-of-the- line, although he was forty- two, — two years older than Nelson at the Nile, but four years younger than Napoleon and Wellington at Waterloo, and one year less in age than Grant at the close of the American Civil War. Such instances are not of the Eighteenth Century 71 of merely curious interest ; they are symptoms of professional states of mind, of a perplexity and perversion of standards which work disastrously whenever war succeeds to a prolonged period of peace, until experience has done its work by sorting out the unsound from among the fair- seeming, and has shown also that men may be too old as well as too young for unaccustomed responsibility. The later prevalence of juster views was exemplified in the choice of Wolfe, who was but thirty-two when he fell before Quebec in 1759, charged with one of the most difficult enterprises that had then been entrusted to a British general. It is these two factors, therefore, an erroneous standard and a lethargic peace, which princi- pally caused the weakness of the British offi- cial staff for battle service at the period of lowest descent, which was reached in the first quarter of the eighteenth century, but was pro- longed and intensified by a protracted interval of professional apathy. Other . grievous evils doubtless existed, serious defects in administra- tion, involving indifferent equipment, bad and scanty provisions, inferior physique in the ships' companies, and wretched sanitary arrangements ; but while all these unquestionably gravely affected general efficiency for war, they belonged rather to the civil than the military side of the profes- sion. In the hour of battle it was not these, but the tone and efficiency of the officers, that 72 Naval Warfare at the Beginning chiefly told. A false pattern of action had been accepted at a moment favorable to its perpetu- ation, when naval warfare on the grand scale had ceased, owing to the decline of the principal enemy, the navy of France; while the average competency of naval officers had been much low- ered through want of professional incentive, and the absence of any sifting process by which the unfit could be surely eliminated. That plenty of good material existed, was sufficiently shown by the number of names, afterwards distinguished, which soon began to appear. Weeding went on apace ; but before its work was done, there had to be traversed a painful period, fruitful of evidences of unfitness, of personal weakness, of low or false professional ideas. It is with this period that we have first had to do as our point of departure, by which not only to estimate the nature and degree of the sub- sequent advance, but to illustrate also the part specifically contributed to it by Hawke and Rodney, through their personal and professional characteristics. While types, they are more than mere exponents of the change as a whole, and will be found to bear to it particular relations, — its leaders in fact, as well as in name. It is not merely fanciful to say that Hawke stands for and embodies the spirit of the new age, while Rodney rather exemplifies and develops the form in which that spirit needed ultimately to cloth itself in order to perfect its working. of the Eighteenth Century yj The one is a protest in act against the pro- fessional faintheartedness, exaggerated into the semblance of personal timidity, shown by the cap- tains off Toulon in 1774; the other, in the simple but skilful methods and combinations adopted by him, both represents and gives effect to a reaction against the extravagant pedantry, which it fell to Byng, in all the honesty of a thoroughly commonplace man, to exhibit in unintentional caricature. In thus ascribing to these great men com- plementary parts in leading and shaping the general movement, it is not meant that either is deficient on the side attributed to the other. Hawke showed by his actions that he was by no means indifferent to tactical combinations, which is another way of saying that he appre- ciated the advantage of form in warfare ; while Rodney, though a careful organizer and driller of fleets, and patient in effort to obtain advan- tage before attacking, exhibited on occasion headlong, though not inconsiderate, audacity, and also tenacious endurance in fight. Still, it will probably be admitted by the student of naval biography that to him Hawke suggests primarily the unhesitating sudden rush — the swoop — upon the prey, while Rodney resembles rather the patient astute watcher, carefully keep- ing his own powers in hand, and waiting for the unguarded moment when the adversary may be taken suddenly at unawares. Certain it is 74 Naval Warfare at the Beginning that, with opportunities much more numerous than were permitted to Hawke, his successes would have been far greater but for an excess of methodical caution. There was a third, who combined in due proportion, and possessed to an extraordinary degree, the special qualities here assigned to each. It is one of the ironies of history that the first Sir Samuel Hood should have had just opportunity enough to show how great were his powers, and yet have been denied the chance to exhibit them under conditions to arrest the attention of the world ; nay, have been more than once compelled to stand by hopelessly, and see occasions lost which he would unquestionably have converted into signal triumphs. In him, as far as the record goes, was consummated the advance of the eighteenth century. He was the greatest of the sowers. It fell to Nelson, his pupil, — in part at least, — to reap the harvest. Before closing this part of our subject, the necessary preliminary to understanding the progress of naval warfare in the eighteenth cen- tury, it is pertinent to note the respect in which advance there differs from that of the nineteenth, and in some degree, though less, from that of the seventeenth centuries. The period was not one of marked material development. Im- provements there were, but they were slow, small in ultimate extent, and in no sense revolu- tionary. Ships and guns, masts and sails, grew of the Eighteenth Century 75 better, as did also administrative processes; it may indeed be asserted, as an axiom of pro- fessional experience, that as the military tone of the sea-ofiEcers rises, the effect will be trans- mitted to those civil functions upon which effi- ciency for war antecedently depends. Still, substantially, the weapons of war were in princi- ple, and consequently in general methods of handling, the same at the end of the period as at the beginning. They were intrinsically more efficient ; but the great gain was not in them, but in the spirit and intellectual grasp of the men who wielded them. There was no change in the least analogous to that from oars to sails, or from sails to steam. Under such conditions of continued similarity in means, advance in the practice of any profession is effected rather in the realm of ideas, in intellectual processes ; and even their expert application in- volves mind rather than matter. In the nineteenth century such intellectual processes have been largely devoted to the purposes of material develop- ment, and have found their realization, in the navy as elsewhere, in revolutionizing instruments, in providing means never before attainable. The railroad, the steamer, the electric telegraph, find their counterpart in the heavily armored steam- ship of war. But in utilizing these new means the navy must still be governed by the ideas, which are, indeed, in many ways as old as military history, but which in the beginning of the eigh- 76 Naval Warfare in the Eighteenth Century* teenth century had passed out of the minds of naval men. It was the task of the officers of that period to recall them, to formulate them anew, to give them a living hold upon the theory and practice of the profession. This they did, and they were undoubtedly helped in so doing by the fact that their attention was not diverted and absorbed, as that of our day very largely has been, by decisive changes in the instruments with which their ideas were to be given effect. Thus they were able to make a substantial and distinc- tive contribution to the art of naval warfare, and that on its highest side. For the artist is greater than his materials, the warrior than his arms ; and it was in the man rather than in his weapons that the navy of the eighteenth century wrought its final conspicuous triumph. H AWKE 1705-1781 THE first great name in British naval annals belonging distinctively to the eighteenth century rather than to the seventeenth, is that of Edward Hawke. He was born in 1705, of a family of no marked social distinction, his father being a barrister, and his grandfather a Lon- don merchant. His mothers maiden name was Bladen. One of her brothers held an important civil ofHce as Commissioner of Trade and Planta- tions, and was for many years a member of Par- liament. Under the conditions which prevailed then, and for some generations longer, the in- fluence attaching to such positions enabled the holder to advance substantially the professional interests of a naval ofificer. Promotion in rank, and occupation both in peace and war, were largely a matter of favor. Martin Bladen nat- urally helped his nephew in this way, a service especially valuable in the earlier part of a career, lifting a man out of a host of competitors and giving him a chance to show what was in him. It may readily be believed that Hawke's marked 7 8 Types of Naval Officers professional capacity speedily justified the advan- tage thus obtained, and he seems to have owed his promotion to post-captain to a superior officer when serving abroad ; though it is never possible to affirm that even such apparent official recognition was not due either to an intimation from home, or to the give and take of those who recognized Bismarck's motto, " Do ut des." However this may have been, the service did not suffer by the favors extended to Hawke. Nor was his promotion unduly rapid, to the in- jury of professional character, as often happened when rank was prematurely reached.^ It was not till March 20, 1734, that he was "made post," as the expression went, by Sir Chaloner Ogle into the frigate Flamborough, on the West India Station. Being then twenty-nine years old, in the prime of life for naval efficiency, he had reached the position in which a fair oppor- tunity for all the honors of the profession lay open to him, provided he could secure occupation until he was proved to be indispensable. Here also his uncle's influence stood good. Although the party with which the experienced politician was identified had gone out of power with Sir Robert Walpole, in 1742, his position on the Board dealing with Colonial affairs left him not without friends. " My colleague, Mr. Cavendish," he writes, " has already laid in his claim for another ship for you. But after so long a voy- age " (he had been aw^ay over three years) " I Hawke 79 ( think you should be allowed a little time to spend with your friends on shore. It is some consola- tion, however, that I have some friends on the new Board of Admiralty." " There has been a clean sweep," he says again, "but I hope I may have some friends amongst the new Lords that will upon my account afford you their protection." This was in the beginning of 1743, when Hawke had just returned from a protracted cruise on the West India and North American stations, where by far the greater part of his early service was passed. He never again returned there, and very shortly after his uncle's letter, just quoted, he was appointed to the Berwick, a ship-of-the-line of seventy gu^s. In command of her he sailed in September, 1 743, for the Mediter- ranean ; and a few months after, by his decided and seamanlike course in Mathews's action, he estab- lished his professional reputation and fortunes, the firm foundations of which had been laid dur- ing the previous years of arduous but inconspicu- ous service. Two years later, in 1746, Martin Bladen died, and with him political influence, in the ordinary acceptation, departed from Hawke. Thenceforth professional merit, forced upon men's recognition, stood him in stead. He was thirty-nine when he thus first made his mark, in 1744. Prior to this there is not found, in the very scanty records that remain of his career, as in that of all officers of his period while in subordinate positions, any 8o Types of Naval Officers certain proof that he had ever been seriously engaged with an enemy. War against Spain had been declared, October 19, 1739. He had then recently commissioned a fifty-gun ship, the Portland, and in her sailed for the West Indies, where he remained until the autumn of 1742; but the inert manner in which Spain maintained the naval contest, notwithstanding that her trans- marine policy was the occasion of the quarrel, and her West Indian possessions obviously en- dangered, removed all chance of active service on the large scale, except in attacking her colo- nies; and in none of those enterprises had the Portland been called upon to share. Meantime, a general European war had begun in 1740, concerning the succession to the Aus- trian throne ; and, in the political combinations which followed, France and Great Britain had as usual ranged themselves on opposite sides, though without declaring war upon each other. Further, there had existed for some time a secret defen- sive alliance between France and Spain, binding each party to support the other, under certain conditions, with an effective armed force, to be used not for aggressive purposes, but in defence only. It was claimed, indeed, that by so doing the supporting country was not to be considered as going to war, or even as engaged in hostilities, except as regarded the contingent furnished. This view received some countenance from in- ternational law, in the stage of development it Hawke 8i had then reached ; yet it is evident that if a Brit- ish admiral met a Spanish fleet, of strength fairly matching his own, but found it accompanied by a French division, the commander of which noti- fied him that he had orders to fight if an attack were made, friendly relations between the two nations would be strained near to the breaking point. This had actually occurred to the British Admiral Haddock, in the Mediterranean, in 1741 ; and conditions essentially similar, but more ex- asperated, constituted the situation under which Hawke for the first time was brought into an action between two great fleets. On the nth of January, 1744, when the Ber- wick joined the British fleet, it had rendezvoused at the Hyeres Islands, a little east of Toulon, watching the movements of twelve Spanish ships- of-the-line, which had taken refuge in the port. As these were unwilling to put to sea trusting to their own strength, the French Admiral De Court was ordered to accompany and protect them when they sailed. This becoming known, Admiral Mathews had concentrated his fleet, which by successive reinforcements — the Ber- wick among others — numbered twenty-eight of- the-line when the allies, in about equal force, began to come out on the 20th of February. The action which ensued owes its historical significance wholly to the fact that it illustrated conspicuously, and in more than one detail, the degenerate condition of the official staff of the 82 Types of Naval Officers British navy; the demoralization of ideals, and the low average of professional competency.^ That there was plenty of good metal was also shown, but the proportion of alloy was danger- ously great. That the machinery of the organi- zation was likewise bad, the administrative system culpably negligent as well as inefficient, had been painfully manifested in the equipment of the ships, in the quality of the food, and in the indifferent character of the ships' crews ; but in this respect Hawke had not less to complain of than others, having represented forcibly to the Admiralty the miserable unfitness of the men sent him. Nevertheless, despite all drawbacks, includ- ing therein a signalling system so rudimentary and imperfect as to furnish a ready excuse to the unwilling, as well as a recurrent perplexity to those honestly wishing to obey their orders, he showed that good will and high purpose could not only lead a man to do his full duty as directed, but guide him to independent initia- tive action when opportunity offered. Under all external conditions of difficulty and doubt, or even of cast-iron rule, the principle was as true then as when Nelson formulated it, that no captain when in doubt could do very wrong if he placed his ship alongside an enemy. That Hawke so realized it brought out into more glaring relief the failure of so many of his colleagues on this occasion. 1 For the account of Mathews's action, including Hawke's personal share in it, see ante, pp. 21-47. Hawke 83 I But the lesson would be in great part lost, if there were to be seen in this lapse only the per- sonal element of the delinquents, and not the widespread decline of professional tone. Un- doubtedly, of course, it is true that the personal equation, as always, made itself felt, but here as intensifying an evil which had its principal source elsewhere. Hawke carried Nelson's maxim into effect. Upon the signal for battle he took his own ship into close action with the antagonist allotted to him by the order of the fleet ; but after beating her out of the line he looked round for more work to do. Seeing then that several of the British vessels had not come within point-blank, but, through professional timidity, or over-cau- tious reverence for the line of battle, were engaging at long range a single Spaniard, he quitted his own position, brought her also to close quarters, and after an obstinate contest, creditable to both parties, forced her to surrender. She was the only ship to haul down her flag that day, and her captain refused to surrender his sword to any but Hawke, whom alone he accepted as his vanquisher. A generation or two later Hawke's conduct in this matter would have drawn little attention ; it would not have been exceptional in the days of St. Vincent and Nelson, nor even in that of Howe. At the time of its occurrence, it was not only in sharp contrast with much that hap- 84 Types of Naval Officers pened on the same field of battle, but it was somewhat contrary to rule. It possessed so far the merit of originality ; and that on the right side, — the side of fighting. As in all active life, so in war a man is more readily pardoned for effecting too much than too little; and it was doubly so' here, because it was evident from the behavior of his peers that he must expect no backing in the extra work he took upon himself. Their aloofness emphasized his forwardness ; and the fact that through the withdrawal of his admiral for the night, the prize was ultimately retaken, together with an officer and seamen he had placed on board, fixed still further attention upon the incident, in which Hawke's action was the one wholly creditable feature. The effect of the battle upon his fortunes was summed up in a phrase. When his first lieuten- ant was sent to report the loss of the prize-crew to Rear-Admiral Rowley, the commander of the division, the latter replied, among other things, that "he had not been well acquainted with Captain Hawke before, but he should now be well acquainted with him from his behavior." Like Nelson at St. Vincent, Hawke was now revealed, not to the navy only but to the nation, — "through his behavior." Somewhat excep- tionally, the king personally took knowledge of him, and stood by him. George II. paid most interested attention to the particulars elicited by the Courts-Martial, — a fact which doubtless con- Hawke 85 tributed to make him so sternly unyielding in the case of Byng, twelve years later. To the king Hawke became " my captain ; " and his influence was directly used when, in a flag promotion in 1747, some in the Admiralty proposed to include Hawke in the retirement of senior captains, which was a common incident in such cases. " I will not have Hawke 'yellowed,' " was the royal fiat; a yellow admiral being the current phrase for one set aside from further active employment. Such were the circumstances under which Hawke first received experience of the fighting conditions of the navy. Whatever his previous attitude towards accepted traditions of profes- sional practice, this no doubt loosened the fet- ters ; for they certainly never constrained him in his subsequent career. He remained in the Mediterranean fleet, generally upon detached services in command of divisions of ships, until the end of 1745. Returning then to England, he saw no further active service until he became a Rear-Admiral — of the White — on July 15, 1747- The promotions being numerous, Hawke's seniority as captain carried him well up the list of rear-admirals, and he was immediately em- ployed ; hoisting his flag July 22d. He then became second to Sir Peter Warren, commander- in-chief of the " Western Squadron." This cruised in the Bay of Biscay, from Ushant to Finisterre, to intercept the naval divisions, and 86 Types of Naval Officers the accompanying convoys of merchant and transport ships, with which the French were then seeking to maintain their colonial empire in North America and in India : an empire already sorely shaken, and destined to fall finally in the next great war. Hawke was now in the road of good luck, pure and unadulterated. His happy action in captur- ing the Poder illustrates indeed opportunity im- proved ; but it was opportunity of the every day sort, and it is the merit that seized it, rather than the opportunity itself, that strikes the attention. The present case was different. A young rear- admiral had little reason to hope for independent command ; but Warren, a well-tried officer, pos- sessing the full confidence of the First Lord, Anson, himself a master in the profession, was in poor health, and for that reason had applied for Hawke to be "joined with him in the command," apparently because he was the one flag-officer immediately available. He proposed that Hawke should for the present occasion take his place, sail with a few ships named, and with them join the squadron, then at sea in charge of a captain. Anson demurred at first, on the ground of Hawke's juniority, — he was forty-two, — and Warren, while persisting in his request, shares the doubt; for he writes,"! observe what you say about the ships abroad being under so young an officer. I am, and have been uneasy about it, though I hope he will do well, and it could not Hawke 87 then be avoided^ Anson, however, was not fixed in his opposition ; for Warren continued, " From your letter I have so little reason to doubt his being put under my command, that I have his instructions all ready ; and he is prepared to go at a moment's notice." The instructions were issued the following day, August 8th, and on the 9th Hawke sailed. But while there was in this so much of luck, he was again to show that he was not one to let occasion slip. Admiral Farra- gut is reported to have said, " Every man has one chance." It depends upon himself whether he is by it made or marred. Burrish and Hawke toed the same line on the morning of February 2 2d, and they had had that day at least equal opportunity. Hawke's adequacy to his present fortune be- trayed itself again in a phrase to Warren, " I have nothing so much at heart as the faithful dis- charge of my duty, and in such manner as will give satisfaction both to the Lords of the Admi- ralty and yourself. This shall ever be my utmost ambition, and no lucre of profit, or other views, shall induce me to act otherwise." Not prize- money; but honor, through service. And this in fact not only ruled his thought but in the moment of decision inspired his act. Curiously enough, however, he was here at odds with the spirit of Anson and of Warren. The latter, in asking Hawke's employment, said the present cruise was less important than the one to succeed it, " for the galleons " — the Spanish treasure- 88 Types of Naval Officers ships — " make it a general rule to come home late in the fall or winter." Warren by prize- money and an American marriage was the richest commoner in England, and Anson it was that had captured the great galleon five years before, to his own great increase; but it was Hawke who, acknowledging a letter from Warren, as this cruise was drawing to its triumphant close, wrote, " With respect to the galleons, as it is uncertain when they will come home and likewise impos- sible for me to divide my force in the present necessitous condition of the ships under my command, I must lay aside all thoughts of them during this cruise." In this unhesitating subor- dination of pecuniary to military considerations we see again the temper of Nelson, between whom and Hawke there was much community of spirit, especially in their independence of ordinary mo- tives and standards. " Not that I despise money," wrote Nelson near the end of a career in which he had never known ease of circumstances ; " quite the contrary, I wish I had a hundred thousand pounds this moment ; " but " I keep the frigates about me, for I know their value in the day of battle, and compared with that day, what signifies any prizes they might take ? " Yet he had his legal share in every such prize. The opening of October 14th, the eighth day after Hawke's letter to Warren just quoted, brought him the sight of his reward. At seven that morning, the fleet being then some four Hawke 89 hundred miles west of La Rochelle in France, a number of sails were seen in the southeast. Chase was given at once, and within an hour it was evi- dent, from the great crowd of vessels, that it was a large convoy outward-bound which could only be enemies. It was in fact a fleet of three hundred French merchantmen, under the protection of eight ships-of-the-line and one of fifty guns, commanded by Commodore L'Etenduere. The force then with Hawke were twelve of-the-line and two of fifty guns. Frigates and lighter vessels of course accompanied both fleets. The average size and armament of the French vessels were considerably greater than those of the Brit- ish ; so that, although the latter had an un- doubted superiority, it vi^as far from as great as the relative numbers would indicate. Prominent British officers of that day claimed that a French sixty-gun ship was practically the equal of a British seventy-four. In this there may have been exaggeration ; but they had good oppor- tunity for judging, as many French ships were captured. When L'Etenduere saw that he was in the presence of a superior enemy, he very manfully drew out his ships of war from the mass, and formed them in order of battle, covering the con- voy, which he directed to make its escape ac- companied by one of the smaller ships-of-the-line with the light cruisers. He contrived also to keep to windward of the approaching British. go Types of Naval Officers With so strong a force interposed, Hawke saw that no prize-money was easily to be had, but for that fortune his mind was already prepared. He first ordered his fleet to form order of battle ; but finding time was thereby lost he changed the signal to that for a general chase, which freed the faster sailers to use their utmost speed and join action with the enemy, secure of support in due time by their consorts as they successively came up. Half an hour before noon the leading British reached the French rear, already under short canvas. The admiral then made signal to en- gage, and the battle began. As the ships under fire reduced sail, the others overtook them, passed by the unengaged side and successively attacked from rear to van. As Haw^ke himself drew near, Rodney's ship, the Eagle, having her wheel and much of her rigging shot away, was for the time unmanageable and fell twice on board the flag- ship, the Devonshire, driving her to leeward, and so preventing her from close action with the French flag-ship Tonnant, of eighty guns, a force far exceeding that of the Devonshire, which had but sixty-six. " This prevented our attacking Le Monarque, 74, and the Tonnant, within any dis- tance to do execution. However we attempted both, especially the latter. While we were en- gaged with her, the breechings of all our lower- deck guns broke, and the guns flew fore and aft, which obliged us to shoot ahead, for our upper Hawke 91 guns could not reach her." The breaking of the breechings — the heavy ropes which take the strain of the guns' recoil — was doubtless ac- celerated by the undue elevation necessitated by the extreme range. The collision with the Eagle was one of the incidents common to battle, but it doubtless marred the completeness of the vic- tory. Of the eight French ships engaged, six were taken ; two, the Tonnant and her next astern, escaped, though the former was badly mauled. Despite the hindrance mentioned, Hawke's personal share in the affair was considerable, through the conspicuous activity of the flag-ship. Besides the skirmish at random shot with the Tonnant, she engaged successively the Trident, 64, and the Terrible, 74, both which were among the prizes. He was entirely satisfied also with the conduct of all his captains, — save one. The freedom of action permitted to them by the gen- eral chase, with the inspiring example of the admiral himself, was nobly used. " Captain Har- land of the Tilbury, 60, observing that the Ton- nant fired single guns at us in order to dismast us, stood on the other tack, between her and the Devonshire, and gave her a very smart fire." It was no small gallantry for a 60 thus to pass close under the undiverted broadside of an 80, — nearly double her force, — and that without orders ; and Hawke recognized the fact by this particular notice in the despatch. With similar initiative, as the Tonnant and Intrepide were seen to be escap- 92 Types of Naval Officers ing, Captain Saunders of the Yarmouth, 64, pursued them on his own motion, and was accompanied, at his suggestion, by the sixty-gun ships of Rod- ney and of Saumarez. A detached action of an hour followed, in which Saumarez fell. The enemy escaped, it is true ; but that does not im- peach the judgment, nor lessen the merits, of the officers concerned, for their ships were both much smaller and more injured than those they attacked. Harland and Saunders became dis- tinguished admirals ; of Rodney it is needless to say the same. In his report of the business, Hawke used a quaint but very expressive phrase, " As the enemy's ships were large, they took a great deal of drubbing, and (consequently) lost all their masts, except two, who had their foremasts left. This has obliged me to lay-to for these two days past, in order to put them into condition to be brought into port, as well as our own, which have suffered greatly." Ships large in tonnage were necessarily also ships large in scantling, heavy ribbed, thick-planked, in order to bear their artil- lery ; hence also with sides not easy to be pierced by the weak ordnance of that time. They were in a degree armored ships, though from a cause differing from that of to-day; hence much "drub- bing " was needed, and the prolongation of the drubbing entailed increase of incidental injury to spars and rigging, both their own and those of the enemy. Nor was the armor idea, directly, Hawke 93 at all unrecognized even then ; for we are told of \\\% Real Felipe in Mathews's action, that, being so weakly built that she could carry only twenty- four-pounders on her lower deck, she had been " fortified in the most extraordinary surprising manner ; her sides being lined four or five foot thick everywhere with junk or old cables to hinder the shot from piercing." It has been said that the conduct of one cap- tain fell under Hawke's displeasure. At a Coun- cil of War called by him after the battle, to establish the fitness of the fleet to pursue the convoy, the other captains objected to sitting with Captain Fox of the Kent, until he had cleared himself from the imputation of misbe- havior in incidents they had noticed. Hawke was himself dissatisfied with Fox's failure to obey a signal, and concurred in the objection. On the subsequent trial, the Court expressly cleared the accused of cowardice, but found him guilty of certain errors of judgment, and specifically of leaving the Tonnant ^\vA(t the signal for close action was flying. As the Tonnant escaped, the implication of accountability for that result nat- urally follows. For so serious a consequence the sentence only was that he be dismissed his ship, and, although never again employed, he was re- tired two years after as a rear-admiral. It was becoming increasingly evident that error of judg- ment is an elastic phrase which can be made to cover all degrees of faulty action, from the mis- 94 Types of Naval Officers takes to which every man is liable and the most faithful cannot always escape, to conduct wholly incompatible with professional efficiency or even manly honor. The case of Fox was one of many occurring at about this period, which, however differing in detail between themselves, showed that through- out the navy, both in active service before the enemy, and in the more deliberate criteria of opinion which influence Courts-Martial, there was a pronounced tendency to lowness of stand- ard in measuring officer-like conduct and official responsibility for personal action; a misplaced leniency, which regarded failure to do the utmost with indulgence, if without approval. In the strin- gent and awful emergencies of war too much is at stake for such easy tolerance. Error of judgment is one thing ; error of conduct is something very different, and with a difference usually recogniz- able. To style errors of conduct "errors of judg- ment " denies, practically, that there are standards of action external to the individual, and condones official misbehavior on the ground of personal incompetency. Military standards rest on dem- onstrable facts of experience, and should find their sanction in clear professional opinion. So known, and so upheld, the unfortunate man who falls below them, in a rank where failure may work serious harm, has only himself to blame ; for it is his business to reckon his own capacity before he accepts the dignity and honors of a Hawke 9S position in which the interests of the nation are intrusted to his charge. An uneasy consciousness of these truths, forced upon the Navy and the Government by wide- spread short-comings in many quarters — of which Mathews's battle was only the most con- spicuous instance — resulted in a very serious modification of the Articles of War, after the peace. Up to 1748 the articles dealing with misconduct before the enemy, which had been in force since the first half of the reign of Charles II., assigned upon conviction the punishment of "death, or other punishment, as the circum- stances of the offence shall deserve and the Court-Martial shall judge fit." After the experi- ences of this war, the last clause was omitted. Discretion was taken away. Men w^ere dissatis- fied, whether justly or not, with the use of their discretion made by Courts-Martial, and deprived them of it. In the United States Navy, similarly, at the beginning of the Civil War, the Govern- ment was in constant struggle with Courts- Martial to impose sentences of severity adequate to the offence ; leaving the question of remission, or of indulgence, to the executive. These facts are worthy of notice, for there is a facile popular impression that Courts-Martial err on the side of stringency. The writer, from a large experience of naval Courts, upon offenders of many ranks, is able to affirm that it is not so. Marryat, in his day, midway between the two periods here 9 6 Types of Naval Officers specified, makes the same statement, in " Peter Simple." "There is an evident inclination to- wards the prisoner; every allowance and every favor granted him, and no legal quibbles attended to." It may be added that the inconvenience and expense of assembling Courts make the executive chary of this resort, which is rarely used except when the case against an accused is pretty clear, — a fact that easily gives rise to a not uncommon assertion, that Courts-Martial are organized to convict. This is the antecedent history of Byng's trial and execution. There had been many examples of weak and inefficient action — of distinct errors of conduct — such as Byng was destined to illus- trate in the highest rank and upon a large scale, entailing an unusual and conspicuous national disaster; and the offenders had escaped, with consequences to themselves more or less serious, but without any assurance to the nation that the punishment inflicted was raising professional standards, and so giving reasonable certainty that the like derelictions would not recur. Hence it came to pass, in 1749, not amid the agita- tions of war and defeats, but in profound peace, that the article was framed under which Byng suffered : " Every person in the fleet, who through cowardice, negligence, or disaffection, shall in time of action, . . . not do his utmost to take or destroy every ship which it shall be his duty to engage ; and to assist all and every Hawke 97 of His Majesty's ships, or those of His aUies, which it shall be his duty to assist and relieve, . . . being con- victed thereof by sentence of a Court- Martial, shall suffer death." Let it therefore be observed, as historically certain, that the execution of Byng in 1757 is directly traceable to the war of 1 739-1 747. It was not determined, as is perhaps generally imagined, by an obsolete statute revived for the purpose of a judicial murder; but by a recent Act, occasioned, if not justified, by circumstances of marked national humiliation and injury. The offences specified are those of which repeated instances had been recently given; and negli- gence is ranked with more positive faults, because in practice equally harmful and equally culpable. Every man in active life, whatever his business, knows this to be so. At the time his battle with L'Etenduere was fought, Hawke was actually a commander-in-chief; for Warren, through his disorder increasing upon him, had resigned the command, and Hawke had been notified of the fact. Hence there did not obtain in his case the consideration, so absurdly advanced for limiting Nelson's reward after the Nile, that he was acting under the orders of a superior several hundred miles away. Neverthe- less, Hawke, like Nelson later, was then a new man, — "a young officer;" and the honor he received, though certainly adequate for a victory over a force somewhat inferior, was not adequate 7 98 Types of Naval Officers when measured by that given to Anson, the First Lord of the Admiralty, for a much less nota- ble achievement six months before. Anson was raised to the peerage ; Hawke was only given the Order of the Bath, the ribbon which Nelson coveted, because a public token, visible to all, that the wearer had done distinguished service. It was at that period a much greater dis- tinction than it afterwards became, through the great extension in numbers and the division into classes. He was henceforth Sir Edward Hawke ; and shortly after the Peace of Aix-la-Chapelle, signed April 30, 1748, another flag-promotion raised him to the rank of Vice-Admiral, of the Blue Squadron. Such rank, accompanied by such recognized merit, insured that he should thenceforth always command in chief; and so it was, with a single brief interval due to a very special and exceptional cause to be hereafter related. During the years of peace, from 1748 to 1755, his employment was mainly on shore, in dock-yard command, which carried with it incidentally a good deal of pre- siding over Courts- Martial. This duty, in his hands, could hardly fail to raise professional standards, with all the effect that precedents, established by the rulings and decisions of Courts, civil and military, exert upon practice. Such a period, however, affords but little for narration, either professional or personal, except when the particular occupations mentioned are the subject Hawke 99 of special study. General interest they cannot be said to possess. But while thus unmarked on the biographical side, historically these years were pregnant with momentous events, which not only affected the future of great nations then existing, but were to determine for all time the extension or restric- tion of their social systems and political ten- dencies in vast distant regions yet unoccupied by civilized man, or still in unstable political tenure. The balance of world power, in short, was in question, and that not merely as every occurrence, large or small, contributes its some- thing to a general result, but on a grand and decisive scale. The phrase "world politics," if not yet invented, characterizes the issues then eminently at stake, though they probably were not recognized by contemporaries, still blinded by the traditions which saw in Europe alone the centre of political interests. To realize the conditions, and their bearing upon a future which has become our present, we should recall that in 1748 the British Empire, as we understand the term, did not exist; that Canada and Louisiana — meaning by the latter the whole undefined region west of the Missis- sippi — were politically and socially French ; that between them the wide territory from the Alleghanies to the Mississippi was claimed by France, and the claim vigorously contested not only by Great Britain herself, but by the thirteen LofG. loo Types of Naval Officers British colonies which became the United States of America ; that in India the representatives of both mother countries were striving for mastery, not merely through influence in the councils of native rulers, but by actual territorial sway, and that the chances seemed on the whole to favor France. In the great struggle for Anglo-Saxon pre- dominance, which had begun under William III., but was now approaching its crisis and final de- cision in the Seven Years War, the determining factor was to be the maritime strength of Great Britain. It is, therefore, the distinctive and dis- tinguished significance of Hawke's career that during so critical a period he not only was the most illustrious and able ofiicer of her navy — the exponent of her sea-power — but that by the force of his personality he chiefly shaped the naval outcome. He carried on the development of naval warfare, revolutionized ideas, raised pro- fessional standards, and thereby both affected the result in his own time, and perpetuated an influence, the effect of which was to be felt in the gigantic contests of later days. In this eminent particular, which involves real originality, no sea officer of the eighteenth century stands with him ; in this respect only he and Nelson, who be- longs rather to the nineteenth, are to be named together. In the years of nominal peace, 1 748-1 755, the Navy of Great Britain was permitted by a politi- cally cautious Government to decline much in Hawke loi power ; but there was compensation in the fact that that of PVance drooped equally. In both countries there was then, as there has been ever since, a party opposed to over-sea enterprise. " The partisans of the Ministry," wrote Walpole in 1755, "d — n the Plantations [Colonies], and ask if we are to involve ourselves in a war for them." The French government underwent a like revulsion of feeling as regarded India, and in 1754 recalled Dupleix in mid-career, in order to quiet the remonstrances of Great Britain. It would be irrelevant, were it not signally instruc- tive, to remark that both nations passed under the influence of the same ideas a hundred years later. In the middle of the nineteenth century, the preponderant expression in England was that the colonies were unprofitable incumbrances, and, if occasion arose, should be encouraged to sepa- rate rather than urged to remain ; while France, through whatever motive, at a critical moment abandoned the field in Egypt, by refusing joint action. It is, therefore, probably the result of a true national genius, asserting itself above temporary aberrations, that the close of the nineteenth century saw France wholly excluded, politically, from Egypt, as she had before been from India, and Great Britain involved in an expensive war, the aim of which was the preser- vation of the imperial system, in the interest not only of the mother country, but of the colo- nies as well. I02 Types of Naval Officers And that it was in the interest of her colonies was precisely the all important part which differ- entiated the Seven Years War in its day, and the South African War in our day, from the struggle, so disastrous to the Empire, that is known as the American Revolution. " There is no repose for our thirteen colonies," wrote Franklin a hundred and fifty years ago, " so long as the French are masters of Canada." "There is no repose for British colonists in South Africa," was the virtual assertion of Natal and the Cape Colony, " so long as the Boer political methods are maintained in the Transvaal with the pledged support of the Orange Free State." Irreconcilable differences of political and social systems, when brought into close contact, involve irrepressible conflict, and admit of no lasting solution except the subjuga- tion and consequent submersion of one or the other. Such a final settlement was attained in North America and in India by the Seven Years War. The full results thereof even we of this day have not yet seen ; for who can yet predict the effect upon the question of the Pacific and of China, that by this war was assured the dominance of the Anglo-Saxon political and legal tradition over the whole American continent north of the tropics, and that the same tradition shall, for a future yet indeterminate, decisively shape the course of India and the Philippines? The pre- ceding war, 1 739-1 748, had been substantially Hawke 103 inconclusive on the chief points at issue, because European questions intervening had diverted the attention of both France and Great Britain from America and from India ; and the exhaustion of both had led to a perfunctory compact, in which the underlying contention was substantially ignored in order to reach formal agreement. That the French conquest of Madras, in India, was yielded in exchange for Louisburg and Cape Breton Island, which the American colonists had won for England, typifies concisely the status q^io to which both parties were willing momentarily to revert, while they took breath before the inevi- table renewal of the strife, with added fury, a few years later; but then upon its proper scene, the sea and the over-sea regions in dispute. In this great arbitrament Hawke was at once called forth to play his part. In 1754 diplomatic contention had become acrimonious, and various events showed that the moment of open conflict was approaching. The squadron in India was then considerably increased. In the beginning of 1755 Hawke was again afloat to command the Channel Fleet, the operations of which extended ordinarily from the Channel, over the Bay of Biscay, to Cape Finisterre. A naval force was collecting at the same time at Portsmouth, under Boscawen, to counteract the preparations the French were known to be making in North America. It sailed soon afterwards, with orders to intercept a squadron convoying reinforcements I04 Types of Naval Officers for Canada ; and on the 8th of June two of these ships were captured off the mouth of the St. Lawrence, the remainder escaping under cover of a fog. In July Hawke went out, with instructions to take any French ships-of-the-line that he might meet; and in August he was further directed to send into port French ships of every kind, mer- chant and other, that he might encounter. Before the end of the year three hundred trading vessels, valued at $6,000,000, had been thus seized. War had not yet been declared, but the captured vessels were held, as on other occasions before and after, as hostages to await the settlement of existing difficulties. The French government protested of course, and recalled its ambassador, but it did not pro- ceed to formal hostilities. A great stroke was in preparation at Toulon, which could be covered for a while by diplomatic correspondence, coupled with angry demonstrations on the Atlantic and Channel coasts. On the loth of April, 1756, twelve French ships-of-the-line and fifteen thou- sand troops sailed for Minorca, then a British possession, and in the absence of a hostile fleet effected a landing without opposition. The Brit- ish cabinet having taken alarm too late. Admiral Bynghad sailed from Portsmouth, with ten ships, only three days before the French left Toulon ; when he arrived off Port Mahon, six weeks later, a practicable breach in the works had already been made. The French fleet was cruising out- Hawke 105 side in support of the siege, and Byng, whose force had been increased to thirteen ships, engaged it on May 20. The action was in itself indeci- sive ; but, upon the opinion of a council of war that nothing more could be done, Byng retired to Gibraltar. The result to him personally is well known. Port Mahon surrendered on June 28. War had by this been declared ; by Great Britain on the 17th of May, and by France June 20, 1756. When the news of Byng's retreat was received in England, Hawke was sent out to supersede him. He went only personally, accompanied by a second in command, but with no fleet, and with sealed instructions. Opening these when he reached Gibraltar, he found orders to send home Byng and his second in command, and to institute an inquiry into the conduct of the captains, sus- pending any one found " not to have acted with due spirit and vigor." An investigation of this kind would enable him to form an opinion of Byng's own conduct even more exact and authentic than his other official opportunities for personal intercourse with the chief actors, but he must have refrained with much discretion from express- ing his judgment on the affair in such way as to reach the public ear. It was stated in the *' Gentle- man's Magazine," in 1766, that an inquiry was provoked in the House of Commons, shortly after these events, by Pitt, who took Byng's side ; but that Hawke, being a member of the House, denied some of Pitt's allegations as to the inadequacy of io6 Types of Naval Officers Byng's fleet, on the strength of his own personal observation after taking over the command. Thereupon, so the account says, the categorical test question, the argumentum ad hommem, was put to him whether with Byng's means he could have beat the enemy ; and the manner of the first Pitt, in thus dealing with an opponent in debate, can be imagined from what we know of him other- wise. Whether the story be true or not, Hawke was not a man to be so overborne, and the reply related is eminently characteristic, " By the grace of God, he would have given a good account of them." Whatever the reason, there seems little doubt that Pitt did not like Hawke ; but the latter was at once too independent to care, and too necessary to be discarded. He remained in the Mediterranean only six months, returning to England in January, 1757. His tenure of this command was marked by an incident which exemplifies the vigorous exercise of power frequent in naval commanders, in the days when neither steam nor telegraph existed to facilitate reference home for instructions ; when men with their strong right arms redressed on the spot what they thought a wrong. A British ship carrying supplies to Gibraltar, where Haw^ke was then lying, was captured by a French privateer and taken into the Spanish port of Algeciras, on the opposite side of the bay. Her surrender was demanded from the governor of the port, Spain being then neutral ; but, being refused, the admiral Hawke io7 sent the boats of the squadron and cut her out. This being resisted by the Spanish forts, a hun- dred British seamen were killed or wounded. On the admiral's return home, Pitt is reported to have told him that he thought he would himself have acted in the same way, but would have made some concession afterwards. Hawke replied that his duty, having the country's force in his hands, was to act as he had, — not to make concessions; but that the Ministry could deal with the case subsequently as it thought fit. In other words, as in joint operations with the army, later in the year, he took the ground that the land officers were the judges of their own business, but that he would see them put safe on shore, as a first step ; so in a matter affecting national honor, as he con- ceived it, he would do the seaman's part and redress the injury, after which the civil authority could arrange with the other party. The known details of this transaction are not full enouo-h to permit a decided opinion as to how far the admiral was justified in his action, judged even by the in- ternational law of the day. It was not necessarily a breach of neutrality to admit a belligerent with her prize; but it would have been, had the French ship gone out from Algeciras, seized her prey, and returned with it. Whatever the facts, how- ever, the episode illustrates interestingly the spirit of Hawke himself, and of the service of that day, as well as his characteristic independence towards superiors when he felt himself right. io8 Types of Naval Officers From this time forward Hawke's service was confined to the Channel Fleet. This was, during that war, the post for the most capable of British officers ; for, while the matter at stake was over- sea predominance and conquest, yet both these depended upon the communications of the French colonies and distant possessions with the mother country. The source of all their strength, the one base indispensable to their operations, was the coast of France ; to close exit from this was therefore to strike at the root. This was much less true for the colonies of Great Britain, at least in America ; their numbers, and resources in every way, were so far superior to those of Canada that they needed only to be preserved from interference by the navy of France, — an end also furthered by the close watch of the French ports. This blockade, as it is often, but erroneously, styled, Hawke was the first to main- tain thoroughly and into the winter months ; and in so doing he gave an extension to the practice of naval warfare, which amounted to a veritable revolution in naval strategy. The con- ception was one possible only to a thorough sea- man, who knew exactly and practically what ships could do ; one also in whom professional knowl- edge received the moral support of strong natural self-confidence, — power to initiate changes, to assume novel responsibility, through the inner assurance of full adequacy to bear it. All this Hawke had. The method, therefore, Hawke 09 the holding the sea, and the exposure of heavy ships to weather before thought impossible, was well within the range of his ability, — of his native and acquired faculties ; but it is due to him to recognize the intellectual force, the originality, which lifted him above the accepted tradition of his predecessors, and by example transmitted to the future a system of warfare that then, as well as in his own hands, was to exercise a decisive effect upon the course of history. It is also to be remembered that he took this weighty step with instruments relatively imperfect, and greatly so. The bottoms of ships were not yet coppered ; in consequence they fouled very rapidly, the result of which was loss of speed. This meant that much greater power, press of canvas, w^as needed to force them through the water, and that they had to be sent frequently into port to be cleaned. Thus they were less able than ships of later days to overtake an enemy, or to keep off a lee shore, while more intricate administration and more ships were required to maintain the efficiency of the squadron by a system of reliefs. Hawke noted also another difficulty, — the fatigue of the crews in cleaning their ships' bottoms. It was even more important to success, he said, to restore the seaman, worn by cruising, by a few days quiet and sleep in port, than to clean thor- oughly at the expense of exhausting them. " If the enemy should slip out and run," he writes, "we must follow as fast as we can." Details no Types of Naval Officers such as these, as well as the main idea, must be borne in mind, if due credit is to be given to Hawke for one of the most decisive advances ever made in the practice of naval campaigning. Some time, however, was to elapse before the close watch of the French ports became a leading feature in the naval policy of the government. The early disasters of the war had forced the king, after much resistance, finally to accept the first Pitt as the leading minister of the Crown, in June, 1757. Pitt's military purpose embraced two principal objects: i, the establishment of the British colonial system by the destruction of that of France, which involved as a necessary prece- dent the control of the sea by a preponderant navy ; and, 2, the support of Frederic of Prussia, then engaged in his deadly contest with the combined armies of France, Austria, and Russia. Frederic's activity made a heavy drain upon the troops and the treasure of France, preventing her by just so much from supporting her colonies and maintaining her fleet; but, heavily outnum- bered as he was, it was desirable to work all possible diversion in his favor by attacks else- where. This Pitt proposed to do by a series of descents upon the French coast, compelling the enemy to detach a large force from before the Prussian king to protect their own shores. As far as the home naval force was concerned, the years 1757 and 1758 were dominated by this idea of diversion in favor of Frederic the Great Hawke 1 1 1 From the general object of these enterprises, the army was necessarily the principal agent ; but the navy was the indispensable auxiliary. Hawke's association with them is interesting chiefly as illustrative of professional character; for there was little or no room for achievement of naval results. The first expedition in which he was concerned was that against Rochefort in 1757. This, though now long forgotten, occasioned by its failure a storm of contemporary controversy. Whatever chances of success it may under any circumstances have had were lost beforehand, owing to the lateness of the season — June — in which Pitt took office. Preparation began at the moment when execution was due. The troops which should have sailed in early summer could not, from delays apparently unavoidable under the conditions, get away before September jo. Hawke himself hoisted his flag — assumed active command — only on August 15. The previous administration was responsible for whatever de- fect in general readiness increased this delay; as regards the particular purpose, Pitt's government was at fault in attempting at all an undertaking which, begun so late in the year, could not expect success under the notorious inadequacy of organi- zation bequeathed to him by his predecessors. But there will always be found at the beginning of a war, or upon a change of commanders, a restless impatience to do something, to make a showing of results, which misleads the judgment 112 Types of Naval Officers of those in authority, and commonly ends, if not in failure, at least in barren waste of powder and shot. Not the least of the drawbacks under which the enterprise labored was extremely defective infor- mation — especially hydrographic. The char- acter of the coast, the places suited for landing, the depths of water, and the channels, were prac- tically unknown. Hence a necessity for recon- noissances, pregnant of indefinite delay, as might have been foreseen. Among Hawke's memo- randa occur the words, " Not to undertake any- thing without good pilots." The phrase is doubly significant, for he was not a man to worry need- lessly about pilots, knowing that pilots look not to military results, but merely to their own responsibility not to take the ground ; and it shows the total ignorance under which labored all who were charged with an undertaking that could only succeed as a surprise, executed with unhesitating rapidity. Hawke himself was astounded at finding in Basque Roads, before Rochefort, " a safe spacious road in which all the navy of England, merchant ships included, may ride without the least annoyance. Before I came here, the place was represented as very difficult of access, and so narrow that ships could not lie in safety from the forts — nay, the pilots made ma7ty baulks before we came m." In fact, want of good pilotage summed up the fault of the ex- pedition, from its inception in the Cabinet through- Hawke 113 out all the antecedent steps of consultation and preparation. Pitt's impetuosity doubtless acted as a spur to laggards, but it was accompanied by a tendency to overbearing insolence that not in- frequently browbeats cautious wisdom. When applied to a man like Hawke, strong in natural temper and in conscious mastery of his profession, the tone characteristic of Pitt provokes an equally resolute self-assertion, as far removed from sub- jection as it is from insubordination ; but friend- ship becomes impossible, and even co-operation difficult. Throughout all Hawke kept his head, and made no serious mistake ; but he accepts no unmerited censures. Seeing that the transports are not enough for the healthful carriage of the troops, he so represents it. The government, already impatient at any report of defects, hopes that things are now arranged to his satisfaction. " I am astonished at this expression," he says, " it is my duty to represent defects, but I am satisfied with any decision you make." Again, " I have received your letter signifying His Majesty's direc- tions to use the utmost diligence in embarking the troops and getting to sea. As I cannot doubt my letter of Sunday being immediately communi- cated to you, I should have expected that before yours was sent His Majesty would have been fully satisfied that I needed no spur in executing his orders." As Hawke and Anson — the First Lord — were friends, there can be Httle doubt that we 114 Types of Naval Officers see here a firm protest against the much laudecl tone to which the efficiency of the British army and navy under Pitt has been too exclusively attributed. It was in the civil administration, the preparation that underlies military success, which being at home was under his own eye, that Pitt's energy was beneficially felt, and also in his prompt recognition of fit instruments; but he had no need to discover Hawke or Boscawen. He might as well be thought to have discovered the sun. In discharginghis part of the expedition Hawke's course is consistent and clear. It must in the first place be recognized that such enterprises are of secondary importance, and do not warrant the risks which are not only justifiable but imperative when a decisive issue is at stake. Hawke's heroic disregard of pilotage difficulties at Quiberon, in 1759, would have been culpable temerity at Basque Roads, in 1757. But, save delays on this account, no time is lost by him. When the decision to land is reached, he is clear as to the possibility of landing ; but when the generals think it impos- sible to effect certain results, he replies that is their business, on which he does not pretend to judge. In his evidence before the Court after- wards, he said, " Whether they should land or not, he constantly thought it the part of the generals to determine. He could not but suppose they were infinitely better judges of their own business than he could be." Their conduct was marked by vacillations strange to him, and which Hawke 115 apparently displeased him ; the troops being, on one occasion, embarked in the boats for some hours, and yet returning to the ships without pro- ceeding. He then addressed a formal letter to the commanding general, saying that if he had no further operation to propose the fleet would return at once to England, and he declined to attend a Council of War to decide either of these points. The Army should decide, alone, whether it could effect anything by landing ; if not, he, without asking counsel, w^ould stay no longer. On Octo- ber 7th he reached Spithead. Pitt, who had espoused Byng's cause against the previous administration, followed its precedent in throwing the blame on the military and naval leaders. In Parliament, he "declared solemnly his belief that there was a determined resolution, both in the naval and military commanders, against any vigorous exertion of the national power." For far less than this accusation Byng had been condemned ; but in fact the fault at Rochefort lay clearly on those who issued the orders, — upon the Cabinet ; upon the character of the expedition itself, — a great risk for a secondary and doubtful object ; upon the inconsiderate haste which disre- garded alike the season and the inadequate know- ledge ; upon defective preparation in the broadest sense of the words. Diversions, in truth, are feints, in which the utmost smoke with the least fire is the object. Carried farther, they entail disaster ; for they rest on no solid basis of adequate ii6 Types of Naval Officers force, but upon successful deception. Pitt's angry injustice met with its due rebuke the next year at St. Cas. It can scarcely be doubted that words such as those quoted were responsible, in part at least, for the disastrous issue of that diversion, the story of which belongs, if to the navy at all, to the life of Howe. That Hawke resented this language can scarcely be doubted, and none the less that he evidently himself felt that something might have been attempted by the troops. He was clear of fault in his own consciousness ; but in the general censure he was involved with his associates — known, so to say, by his friends, implicated in the meshes of a half-truth, where effort to clear one's self results in worse entanglement. He had the manly cast of character which will not struggle for self-vindication ; but his suppressed wrath gathered force, until a year later it resulted, upon occasion of official provocation, in an explosion that has not a close parallel in naval history. He had hoisted his flag again on February 28, 1758. His first service was directed against a French squadron of five ships-of-the-line, fitting at Rochefort to convoy troops for the relief of Louisburg, in Cape Breton Island, then about to be besieged by British and colonial forces. Hawke's observations of the previous year had ascertained the hitherto unknown facilities of Basque Roads for occupation by a fleet and con- sequent effectual interception of such an expedi- Hawke 117 tion. Upon making the land the French vessels were found already in the Roads, therefore soon to sail ; but before this superior force of seven ships they cut their cables, and fled across the shoals up the river Charente, on which Rochefort lies. Hawke, instructed by his previous expe- rience, had earnestly but fruitlessly demanded fire- ships and bomb-vessels to destroy the enemy in case they grounded on the flats ; which they did, and for some hours lay exposed to such an attack. Not having these means, he had to watch help- lessly the process of lightening and towing by which they at last made their escape. He then returned to England, having frustrated the relief expedition but, through defective equipment, not destroyed the vessels. The Admiralty, upon re- ceiving his report of the transaction, made no acknowledgments to him. Pitt had profited by Hawke's ineffectual re- quest for small vessels and his suffering from the want of them ; but he utilized the suggestions in a manner that robbed their author of any share in the results. A squadron of that sort was to be constituted, to operate on the French coast in diversions like that of 1757; but it was to be an independent command, under an officer chosen by the Government without consulting the ad- miral. To the main fleet was assigned the nec- essary, but in credit very secondary, office of cruising off Brest, to prevent interruption by the French ships there ; to play, in short, the incon- ii8 Types of Naval Officers spicuous role of a covering force, while the light squadron had the brilliant part of fighting. The officer selected for the latter was Howe, deservedly a favorite of Hawke's, but not therefore acceptable to him as a supplanter in his honors. The admiral had been for some time superin- tending the equipment of the vessels for the light division, when, on May lo, 1758, Howe reported to him, bringing his orders. Hawke boiled over at once ; and, in a heat evidently beyond his will to control, despatched the following letter, three hours after Howe's arrival. Portsmouth, 7 o'clock p. m. loth May, 1758. Sir, — About 4 o'clock arrived here Captain Howe, and delivered me their Lordships' order of the 9th. In last September I was sent out to command an expedi- tion under all the disadvantages one could possibly labor under, arising chiefly from my being under the influence of land-officers in Councils of War at sea.^ Last cruise (March-April, 1758) I went out on a partic- ular service, almost without the least means of perform- ing it. Now every means to ensure success is provided ; another is to reap the credit ; while it is probable that I, with the capital ships, might be ordered to cruise in such a manner as to prevent his failing in this attempt. To fit out his ships for this service I have been kept here,^ and even now have their Lordships' directions, at least in terms, to obey him. He is to judge of what he wants for his expedition ; he is to make his demands, 1 By express orders from the Ministry Councils of War had to be held. ^ An application for four days' leave for private business had been refused. Hawke 119 and I am to comply with them. I have therefore directed my flag immediately to be struck, and left their- Lordships' orders with Vice-Admiral Holburne. For no consequence that can attend my striking it without orders shall ever outbalance with me the wearing it one moment with discredit. I am, etc. E. Hawke. It is impossible to justify so extreme a step as abandoning one's command without permission, and especially under circumstances that permitted the orderly course of asking for detachment. Nevertheless, Hawke did well to be angry ; and, as is sometimes the case, an injudicious and, in point of occasion, unseemly loss of temper, doubt- less contributed to insure for him in the future, to a degree which forbearance or mere remonstrance would not have assured, the consideration essen- tial to his duties. Many will remember the effect produced by Plimsolls unparliamentary outbreak. The erroneous impression, that admirals and gen- erals fit to be employed at all were to be ridden booted and spurred, needed correction. Hawke had misapprehended the intention of the Govern- ment, in so far as believing that the light squadron was to be employed in Basque Roads, the scene of last years failure ; but he was right in thinking that intrusting the enterprise to another, on that occasion his junior, would be a reflection upon himself, intensified by making the command practically independent, while he was limited to I20 Types of Naval Officers the covering duty. Under these circumstances, erroneously imagined by him, the squadron should have been attached to his command, and the particular direction left to him ; the Government giving to him, instead of to Howe, the general orders which it issued, and arranging with him beforehand as to the command of the detached squadron. But even under the actual conditions, of an intention to operate on the western Channel coast of France, it would have been graceful and ap- propriate to recognize Hawke's eminent past, and recent experience, by keeping under his command the ships he had himself fitted for the service, and directing him to despatch Howe with the necessary- instructions. It was as in the Nile campaign, where the general directions were sent to St. Vincent, with a clear expression of the Govern- ment's preference for Nelson as the officer to take charge. The intended scene of Howe's opera- tions, if not formally within Hawke's district, was far less distant from Brest than Toulon and Italy were from Cadiz, where St. Vincent covered Nel- son's detachment. In the wish for secrecy, per- haps, or perhaps through mere indifference to the effect produced upon Hawke, as a man assumed to need curb and spur, he was left in ignorance, to imagine what he pleased ; and this action, suc- ceeding previous neglects and Pitt's imputations of the previous year, elicited an outburst which, while it cannot be justified in its particular mani- Hawke 121 festation, was in spirit inevitable. A man sub- missive to such treatment as he had good cause to suspect, would be deficient in the independence of character, and sensitive regard to official repu- tation, without which he was unfit to command the Channel Fleet. Hawke was summoned at once to the Admir- alty, and in the interview which ensued, as shown by the minutes endorsed on his own letter, his misconception as to the quarter in which Howe was to act afforded standing ground for a com- promise. Hawke having committed himself officially, and upon a mistaken premise, the Admiralty had him technically at their mercy ; but such a triumph as they could win by dis- ciplining him would be more disastrous than a defeat. He disclaimed resentment towards any person, and reiterated that his action was in- tended merely to defend his character and honor, which he said — to quote the minute exactly — " were not so much touched as he apprehended when the suspicion he had of Mr. Howe's going to Basque Roads arose — from the Lords asking him some days since for a draft of the Roads." The italics are the present writer's ; but the words as they stand would indicate that he did not yield his view of the matter in general, nor leave hearers under any doubt as to how far he could safely be treated with contumely or slight. There can be little doubt that the substantial result was to strengthen his position in the exact- 122 Types of Naval OfBcers ing duty that lay before him in the following year. The whole business was then salved over by the First Lord, Anson, taking command of tlie Channel Fleet for the particular occasion. Hawke accompanied him as second in command, while How^e went his way with the light squadron and the troops. Both divisions sailed on the ist of June. On the i8th our admiral was so unwell with a severe fever and cold — a complaint to which he was much subject — that he had to ask to be sent into port. He went ashore before the end of the month, and remained unemployed till the following May. The year 1759 is the culminating epoch of Hawke's career. In it occurred the signal tri- umph of Quiberon Bay, the seal of his genius, significant above all as demonstrating that the ardor of the leader had found fulfilment in his followers, that the spirit of Hawke had become the spirit of the Navy. This year also yielded proof of his great capacity as a seaman and ad- ministrator, in the efficient blocking of Brest, prolonged through six months of closest watching into the period of the winter gales, in face of which it had hitherto been thought impossible to keep the sea with heavy ships massed in fleets ; for, as he most justly said, in explaining the necessity of maintaining the rendezvous fixed by him, " A single ship may struggle with a hard gale of wind when a squadron cannot. In work- Hawke 123 ing against a strong westerly gale in the Channel, where it cannot make very long stretches," — because it finds shores and shoals on either side, — "it must always by wearing lose ground, but more especially if it should so blow as to put it past carrying sail." The method used by Hawke was not only an innovation on all past practice, but, as has before been said, constituted the pat- tern whereon were framed the great blockades of the Napoleonic period, which strangled both the naval efficiency and the commercial and financial resources of the Empire. These were but devel- opments of Hawke's fine achievement of 1759; the prestige of originality belongs to him. Even their success, with better ships and the improve- ment of detail always accompanying habit, is fore- shadowed by his. " I may safely affirm that, except the few ships that took refuge in Conquet, hardly a vessel of any kind has been able to enter or come out of Brest for four months," — ending October loth. "They have been obliged to un- load near forty victuallers at Quimperley and carry their cargoes by land to Brest. It must be the fault of the weather, not ours, if any of them escape." ' It was suitable indeed that so strenuous and admirable an exhibition of professional ability, — of naval generalship, — alike in strategic combi- nation, tactical disposition, and administrative superintendence, should terminate in a brilliant triumph, at once its fruit and its crown ; wherein 124 Types of Naval Officers sedulous and unremittent readiness for instant action, comprehended by few, received a startling demonstration which none could fail to understand. As Nelson was pursued by ignorant sneers before the Nile, so Hawke was burned in effigy by the populace, at the very moment when laborious effort was about to issue in supreme achievement. The victory in either case is less than the ante- cedent labor, as the crown, after all, is less than the work, the symbol than the fact symbolized. A brief account of preceding conditions, and of the dispositions maintained to meet them, is therefore necessary to due appreciation of the victory of Quiberon Bay. Although the diver- sions of 1758 had not very materially aided FredQric of Prussia, they had inflicted distinct humiliation and harassment upon France. This, added to defeat upon the Continent and in North America, had convinced the French Government, as it convinced Napoleon a half-century later, that a determined blow must be struck at England herself as the operative centre upon which rested, and from which proceeded, the most serious detriment to their cause and that of their allies. It was resolved, therefore, to attempt an invasion of England ; to the threat of which the English people were always extremely sensitive. From local conditions the French preparations had to be made in several separate places ; it was the task of the British Navy to prevent the con- centration of these different detachments in a Hawke 125 joint effort. The troops must embark, of course, from some place near to England ; their principal points of assembly were on the Channel, whence they were to cross in flat-boats, and in the Biscay ports, from Brest to the mouth of the Loire. The Bay of Quiberon, from which Hawke's ac- tion takes its name, lies between the two latter points. It is sheltered from the full force of the Atlantic gales by a peninsula of the same name, and by some shoals which prolong the barrier to the southward of the promontory. To cross safely, it was necessary to provide naval protection. To this end squadrons were equipped in Toulon and in Brest. Combined at the latter point, and further strengthened by divisions expected to return from North America, they would constitute a force of very serious con- sideration in point of numbers. Rochefort also was an element in the problem, though a minor one ; for either the small force already there might join the concentration, or, if the port were unwatched, the American or other divisions might get in there, and be at least so much nearer to Brest, or to a neighboring point of assembly, as Quiberon Bay. As the French Navy was essential to the French crossing, as its junction was essential to action, as the point of junction was at or near Brest — for there was the district near which the troops were assembling — and as by far the largest detachment was already in Brest, that port 126 Types of Naval Officers became the important centre upon blocking which depended primarily the thwarting of the invasion. If the French Navy succeeded in concentrating at Brest, the first move in the game would be lost. Hawke therefore had the double duty of not allow- ing the squadron there to get out without fight- ing, and of closing the entrance to reinforcements. The latter was far the m.ore difficult, and could not be assured beyond the chance of failure, because an on-shore gale, which would carry his fleet into the Channel to avoid being driven on the French coast, would be fair for an outside enemy to run into the port, friendly to him. This actually occurred at a most critical moment, but it could only happen by a combination of circumstances ; that is, by the hostile squadron chancing to arrive at a moment when the British had been blown off. If it approached under ordi- nary conditions of weather it would run into the midst of foes. The great names of the British Navy were then all afloat in active command. Rodney was before Havre, which he bombarded in the course of the summer, doing a certain amount of dam- age, harassing the local preparations for invasion, and intercepting vessels carrying supplies to the Brest fleet and coastwise. Boscawen, second only to Hawke, was before Toulon, to hold there the dozen ships-of-the-line under De la Clue, as Hawke was charged to stop the score under Conflans. Hawke 127 In broad conception, Hawke's method was simple and can be easily stated ; the difficulty lay in carrying it out. The main body of his force had a rendezvous, so chosen that in violent weather from the westward it could at worst drift up Channel, but usually would have a fair wind for Torbay, a roadstead on the British coast about a hundred miles distant. To the rendezvous the fleet was not tied under ordi- nary circumstances ; it was merely a headquarters which admitted of cruising, but where despatches from home would always find the admiral in per- son, or news of his whereabouts. Near Brest itself was kept an inshore squadron of three or four ships, which under ordinary circumstances could see the enemy inside, noting his forward- ness ; for the cannon of the day could not molest a vessel more than a mile from the entrance, while the conditions within of spars and sails indicated to a seaman the readiness or intention to move, to a degree not ascertainable with ships dependent on steam only. With these dispositions, if a westerly gale came on, the fleet held its ground while it could, but when expedient to go put into Torbay. Ow- ing to the nearness of the two places, the weather, when of a pronounced character, was the same at both. While the wind held to the westward of south, or even at south-southeast, a ship-of-the- line could not beat out from Brest; much less a fleet. The instant the wind went east, fair for 128 Types of Naval Officers exit, the British left Torbay, with certainty of not being too late ; for, though the enemy might get out before their return, the east wind would not suffer them to close with the French coast at another point soon enough to avoid a meet- ing. While in Torbay the time was improved by taking on board stores and provisions ; nor was the night's rest at anchor a small consideration for seamen w^orn with continual cruising. The practical merits displayed by Hawke in maintaining this simple but arduous service were, first and supremely, the recognition of its pos- sibility, contrary to a tradition heretofore as com- monly and as blindly accepted as those of the line-of-battle, and of the proper methods for fleet attack before described. It must be remembered also that in these wars, 1 739-1 763, for the first time the British Navy found the scene of action, in European waters, to be the Biscay coast of France. In the former great wars of the seven- teenth century, French fleets entered the Channel, and pitched battles were fought there and in the North Sea. Thence the contest shifted to the Mediterranean, where the great fleets operated in the later days of William III., and the reign of Anne. Then, too, the heavy ships, like land armies, went into winter quarters. It was by distinguished admirals considered profes- sionally criminal to expose those huge yet cum- brous engines of the nation's power to the buffet- ings of winter gales, which might unfit them next Hawke 129 year to meet the enemy, snugly nursed and restored to vigor in home ports during the same time. The need of periodical refitting and clean- ing the bottoms clinched the argument in favor of this seasonable withdrawal from the sea. With this presumed necessity, attention had not been paid to developing a system of mainte- nance and refit adapted to the need of a fleet per- forming what Hawke undertook. In this, of course, there cannot be assigned to him the in- dividuality of merit that may belong to a concep- tion, and does belong to the man who initiates and assumes, as he did, the responsibility for a novel and hazardous course of action. Many agents had to contribute to the forwarding of supplies and repairs; but, while singleness of credit cannot be assumed, priority is justly due to him upon whose shoulders fell not only all blame, in case his enterprise failed, but the fundamental difficulty of so timing the reliefs of the vessels under his command, so arranging the order of rotation in their going and coming as to keep each, as well as the whole body, in a constant con- dition of highest attainable efficiency — in num- bers, in speed, and in health — for meeting the enemy, whose time of exit could not be foreknown. Naturally, too, the man on whom all this fell, and who to the nation would personify success or failure, as the event might be, — terms which to him would mean honor or ruin, — that man, when professionally so competent as Hawke, would be 9 I JO Types of Naval Officers most fruitful in orders and in suggestions to attain the desired end. In this sense there can be no doubt that he was foremost, and his correspon- dence bears evidence of his preoccupation with the subject. Into particulars it is scarcely necessary to go. Administrative details are interesting only to specialists. But one quality absolutely essential, and in which most men fail, he manifested in high degree. He feared no responsibility, either towards the enemy, or towards the home authori- ties. Superior and inferior alike heard plainly from him in case of defects ; still more plainly in case of neglect. " It is a matter of indifference to me whether I fight the enemy, should they come out, with an equal number, one ship more, or one ship less." " I depend not on intelligence from the French ports; what I see I believe, and regulate my conduct accordingly ; " a saying which recalls one of Farragut's, —r " The officers say I don't believe anything. I certainly beheve very little that comes in the shape of reports. They keep everybody stirred up. I mean to be whipped or to whip my enemy, and not to be scared to death." Agitation, to a very considerable degree, was the condition of Hawke's superiors ; to say the least, anxiety strained to the point of approaching panic. But Hawke could have adopted truly as his own Farragut's other words, " I have full confidence in myself and in my judg- ment," — that is, of course, in professional mat- Hawke 131 ters ; and he spoke reassuringly out of the firmness of his self-reliance. " Their Lordships will pardon me for observing that from the present disposition of the squadron I think there is little room for alarm while the weather continues tolerable." Again, a few days later, " Their Lordships may rest assured there is little foundation for the pre- sent alarms. While the wind is fair for the enemy's coming out, it is also favorable for our keeping them in ; and while we are obliged to keep off they cannot stir." This was in October, when the weather was already wild and the days shortening. With equally little hesitancy, though without breach of subordination, he overbears the Admir- alty when they wish to pay what he considers exaggerated care to cleaning the bottoms, trace- able, no doubt, to the prejudices of the Sea Lords. " If the ships take up a month by cleaning, from the time they leave me to their return, it will be impossible for me to keep up the squadron. The only practicable way is to heel, etc., and confine them to ten days in port for the refreshment of their companies in case they should miss the spring tide." " Their Lordships wdll give me leave to observe that the relief of the squadron depends more on the refreshment of the ships' companies than on cleaning the ships. By the hurry the latter must be performed in, unless the ship con- tinues a month or five weeks in port, which the present exigency will by no means admit of, the 132 Types of Naval Officers men would be so harassed and fatigued that they would return to me in a worse condition than when they left me. . . . However, I shall endeavor to comply with all their Lordships' directions in such manner as, to the best of my judgme^it, will answer their intentions in employing m.e here''' The words italicized strike the true note of subor- dination duly tempered with discretion. To the Navy Board, a civil adjunct to the Admiralty, but possessed of considerable indepen- dent power to annoy officers in active military service, he took a more peremptory tone. He had discharged on his own authority, and for rea- sons of emergency, a mutinous surgical officer. For this he was taken to task, as Nelson a gen- eration later was rebuked by the same body. " I have to acquaint you," he replied, " that there was no mistake in his being ordered by me to be dis- charged." He then gives his reasons, and con- tinues, " For the real good of the service I ordered him to be discharged, and his crime noted on his list of pay, for your information. I shall not enter into any dispute with you about my authority as a Commanding Officer, neither do I ever think of inconveniences or prejudices to myself, as a party, according to your insinuations, where the good of the service is concerned." It must be added that to subordinates he was as liberal with praise as he was with censure, where either was merited ; nor did he fail in kindly personal intervention upon due occasion for deserving or unfortunate men. Hawke ^33 More reserved, apparently, than Nelson, he seems to have been like him sympathetic ; and hence it was that, as before observed, it was his spirit that he communicated to the navy rather than a system, admirable as was the strategic system embodied in his methods of blockade. It was by personal influence rather than by formulated precept that Hawke inspired his service, and earned a just claim to be reckoned the greatest force of his century in naval development. The general conditions being as described, the fighting in the naval campaign of 1759 began in the Mediterranean. On June 8th Boscawen, hav- ing driven two French frigates into a fortified bay near Toulon, attacked them with three ships-of- the-line. The attack failed, and the British ships were badly injured ; a timely lesson on the gen- eral inexpediency of attacking shore batteries with vessels, unless for special and adequate reasons of probable advantage. In July he returned to Gibraltar, to refit and for provisions. In the absence of details, positive criticism is unwar- ranted ; but it is impossible not to note the differ- ence between this step, during summer weather, and the Toulon blockades of Lord St. Vincent, who, when before Brest, modelled his course upon that of Hawke. The port being thus left open, De la Clue sailed on the 5th of August for Brest. On the 17th he was near the straits of Gibraltar, hugging the African coast, and falling night gave promise of passing unseen, when a British look- 134 Types of Naval Officers out frigate caught sight of his squadron. She hauled in for Gibraltar at once, firing signal guns. Boscawen'sships were in the midst of repairs, mostly dismantled ; but, the emergency not being unfore- seen, spars and sails were sent rapidly aloft, and within three hours they were underway in pursuit. The French division separated during the night. Five ships put into Cadiz. The British next morning caught sight of the remaining seven, among which was the admiral, and a sharp chase resulted in the destruction of five. From August 1 8th the Toulon fleet was eliminated from the cam- paign ; though the vessels in Cadiz remained to the end a charge upon Hawke's watchfulness, similar to that caused by the enemy's divisions expected from America. That one of the latter was already on its way home, under the command of Commodore Bom- part, was notified to our admiral on September 2ist by a despatch from England. He immedi- ately sent a division of heavy ships to reinforce the light squadron to the southward. " If the alarm is great now," he said, ''it will be much greater if he get into Rochefort." Further infor- mation from the West Indies contradicted the first report, and on October loth Hawke recalled the ships-of-the-line, apparently at the wish of the Admiralty ; for he expresses his regret at doing so, and asks for more of the " many ships " then in England, that Rochefort may be blocked as well as Brest. The incident has now little impor- Hawke 135 tance, except as indicating the general national nervousness, and the difficulty under which he labored through force inadequate to the numerous and exacting duties entailed by constant holding the sea in war. From this point of view it bears upon his conduct. That Bompart was coming proved to be true. On November loth Hawke anchored with the fleet in Torbay, after three days of struggle against a very heavy westerly storm. " Bompart, if near, may get in," he wrote the Admiralty, " but no ship can get out from any port in the Bay." The weather had then moderated, but was still too rough for boating, even in the sheltered roadstead ; hence he could get no reports of the state of the ships, which shows incidentally the then defective system of signalling. On the 12th he sailed, on the 1 3th was again forced into Torbay by a south- wester, but on the 14th got away finally. On the afternoon of the i6th the fleet was twenty-five miles from the Island of Ushant, near Brest, and there learned from transports, returning from the the light division off Quiberon, that the French fleet had been seen the day before, seventy-five miles northwest of Belleisle ; therefore some fifty or sixty miles southeast of the point where this news was received. Conflans had sailed the same day that the British last left Torbay, but before his departure Bompart had opportunely arrived, as Hawke had feared. His ships were not able to go at once to sea on so important a mission, 136 Types of Naval Officers but their seasoned crews were a welcome reinforce- ment and were distributed through the main fleet, which numbered twenty-one ships-of-the-line. Hawke had twenty-three. Concluding that the enemy were bound for Quiberon, Hawke carried a press of sail for that place. He knew they must be within a hundred miles of him and aimed to cut them off from their port. During the 17th the wind, hanging to the south and east, was adverse to both fleets, but on the 1 8th and 19th it became more favorable. At half-past eight on the morning of the 20th, one of the look-out frigates ahead of the British made the signal for sighting a fleet. It was then blow- ing strong from the west-northwest, and Belleisle, which is ten miles w^est of Quiberon Bay, and south of which the fleets must pass, was by the English reckoning forty miles distant. A course of some fifty or sixty miles was therefore to be run before the enemy could close the land, and there remained about eight hours of sun. Hawke 's day had come. Towards ten o'clock he had the enemy sufficiently in view to see that they were intent upon securing their arrival, rather than fighting. He therefore made signal for the seven ships nearest them " to chase and draw into a line-of-battle ahead of me, and en- deavour to stop them till the rest of the squadron should come up, who also were to form as they chased that no time might be lost in the pursuit." The French " kept going off under such sail as Hawke 137 all their squadron could carry and yet keep to- gether^ while we crowded after him with every sail our ships could bear'' The words italicized sum up the whole philosophy of a general chase. The pursued are limited to the speed of the slowest, otherwise he who cannot but lag is separated and lost ; the pursuer need slacken no whit, for his friends are ever coming up to his aid. Overtaking is inevitable, unless the dis- tance is too short. At half-past two firing began between the French rear and the leading British. Of the two foremost in the chase, who thus opened the fight, one was the same Dorsetshire which in Mathews's battle had played the laggard. Her captain, who thus rose to his opportunity, was one of the two to whom Hawke addressed the enthusiastic com- pliment that they had " behaved like angels." Hawke himself was at this moment south of Belleisle, with several ships ahead of him ; while the French admiral was leading his fleet, in order better to pilot them over dangerous ground, and by his own action show more surely than was possible by signal what he wished done from moment to moment. At the southern extreme of the shoals which act as a breakwater to Quiberon Bay are some formidable rocks, known as the Cardinals. Around these M. de Conflans passed soon after the firing began, his rear being then in hot action. Hawke himself was without a pilot, as were 138 Types of Naval Officers most of his captains. The sailing master of the flag-ship was charged with that duty for the fleet, but had of the ground before him no exact per- sonal knowledge ; nor could reliance be placed upon the imperfect surveys of a locality, which it was not the interest of an almost constant enemy to disclose. Enough, however, was known to leave no doubt of the greatness of the risks, and it was the master's part to represent them. The occasion, however, was not one of a mere diversion, of a secondary operation, but of one vital to the nation's cause ; and Hawke's reply, stamped with the firmness of a great officer, showed how little professional timidity had to do with his laudable care of his fleet in Basque Roads two years before. " You have done your duty in warning me," he replied ; " now lay us alono^side the French Commander-in-chief." So amid the falling hours of the day the British fleet, under the unswerving impulse of its leader, moved steadfastly forward, to meet a combination of perils that embraced all most justly dreaded by seamen, — darkness, an intricate navigation, a lee shore fringed with outlying and imperfectly known reefs and shoals, towards which they were hurried by a fast-rising wind and sea, that for- bade all hope of retracing their steps during the long hours of the night. " Had we but two hours more daylight," wrote Hawke in his official report, " the whole had been totally destroyed or taken ; for we were almost Hawke 139 up with their van when night overtook us." His success would have been greater, though not more decisive of issues than the event proved it ; but nothing could have added to the merit or brilliancy of his action, to which no element of grandeur was wanting. This was one of the most dramatic of sea fights. Forty-odd tall ships, pursuers and pursued, under reefed canvas, in fierce career drove furiously on ; now rushing headlong down the forward slope of a great sea, now rising on its crest as it swept beyond them ; now seen, now hidden ; the helmsmen straining at the wheels, upon which the huge hulls, tossing their prows from side to side, tugged like a mad- dened horse, as though themselves feeling the wild " rapture of the strife " that animated their masters, rejoicing in their strength and defying the accustomed rein. The French admiral had flattered himself that the enemy, ignorant of the ground, would not dare to follow him round the Cardinals. He was soon undeceived. Hawke's comment on the situation was that he was ''for the old way of fighting, to make downright work with them." It was an old way, true ; but he had more than once seen it lost to mind, and had himself done most to restore it to its place, — a new way as well as an old. The signals for the general chase and for battle were kept aloft, and no British ship slacked her way. Without ranged order, save that of speed, the leaders mingled 140 Types of Naval Officers with the French rear; the roar and flashes of the guns, the falUng spars and drifting clouds of smoke, now adding their part to the wild mag- nificence of the scene. Though tactically perfect in the sole true sense of tactics, that the means adopted exactly suited the situation, this was a battle of incidents, often untold, — not one of manoeuvres. As the ships, rolling heavily, buried their flanks deeply in the following seas, no cap- tain dared to open his lower tier of ports, where the most powerful artillery was arrayed — none save one, the French Thesee, whose rashness was rebuked by the inpouring waters, which quickly engulfed both ship and crew. The Superbe met a like fate, though not certainly froni the same cause. She sank under the broadside of the Royal George, Hawke's flag-ship. " The Royal Georges people gave a cheer," wrote an eye wit- ness, " but it was a faint one ; the honest sailors were touched at the miserable state of so many hundreds of poor creatures." Americans and English can couple this story of long ago with Philip's ejaculation off Santiago de Cuba, but three years since: "Don't cheer, boys, those poor devils are dying." By five o'clock two French ships had struck, and two had been sunk. " Night was now come," wrote Hawke, "and being on a part of the coast, among islands and shoals of which we were totally ignorant, without a pilot, as was the greatest part of the squadron, and blowing hard Hawke 141 on a lee shore, I made the signal to anchor." The day's work was over, and doubtless looked to him incomplete, but it was effectually and finally done. The French Navy did not again lift up its head during the three years of war that remained. Balked in their expectation that the foe's fear of the beach would give them refuge, harried and worried by the chase, harnessed to no fixed plan of action, Conflans's fleet broke apart and fled. Seven went north, and ran ashore at the mouth of the little river Vilaine which emp- ties into Quiberon Bay. Eight stood south, and succeeded in reaching Rochefort. The fate of four has been told. Conflans's flag-ship anchored after night among the British, but at daybreak next morning cut her cables, ran ashore, and was burned by the French. One other, wrecked on a shoal in the bay, makes up the tale of twenty-one. Six were wholly lost to their navy ; the seven that got into Vilaine only escaped to Brest by twos, two years later, while the Rochefort division was effectually blocked by occupying Basque Roads, the islands of which and of Quiberon were cultivated as kitchen gardens for the re- freshment of British crews. Of the British, one ship went on a shoal during the action, and on the following day another coming to her assistance also grounded. Both were lost, but most of their people were saved. Beyond this Hawke's fleet suffered little. "As to the loss we have sustained," wrote he, " let it 142 Types of Naval Officers be placed to the account of the necessity I was under of running all risks to break this strong force of the enemy." A contemporary witness assigns to Hawke's own ship a arge individual share in the fighting. Of this he does not himself speak, nor is it of much matter. That all was done with her that could be done, to aid in achieving success, is sufficiently assured by his previous record. Hawke's transcendent merit in this affair was that of the general officer, not of the private captain. The utmost courage shown by the commander of a single ship before the enemy's fire cannot equal the heroism which assumes the immense responsibility of a doubtful issue, on which may hang a nation's fate ; nor would the admiral's glory be shorn of a ray, if neither then nor at any other time had a hostile shot traversed his decks. The night of the 20th passed in anxieties inseparable from a situation dangerous at best,, but still more trying to an admiral upon whom, after such a day, night had closed without ena- bling him to see in what case most of his ships- were. "In the night," he reports, "we heard many guns of distress fired, but, blowing hard, want of knowledge of the coast, and whether they were fired by a friend or an enemy, prevented all means of relief." In the morning he resumed his activity. Little, however, could be done. The continuing violence of the wind, and igno- Hawke 143 ranee of the ground, prevented approach within gun-shot to the ships at the mouth of the Vilaine, while they, by lightening and favor of the next flood tide, warped their way inside through the mud flats. Hawke remained nearly two months longer, re- turning to England January 17, 1760. He had then been thirty-five weeks on board, without set- ting foot on shore. At the age of fifty-four, and amid such manifold cares, it is not to be wondered at that he should need relief. Rather must he be considered fortunate that his health, never robust in middle life, held firm till his great triumph was achieved. Boscawen succeeded him temporarily in the command. He was received in England with acclamations and with honors ; yet the most conspicuous mark of approval conferred on admirals before and after, the grant of the peerage, was not given to him, who had wrought one of the very greatest services ever done for the country. Recent precedent — that of Anson — demanded such recognition ; and popular enthusiasm would have applauded, although the full military merit of the man could scarcely be appreciated by the standards of his generation. That no such reward was bestowed is most probably attributable to Hawke's own indif- ference to self-advancement. If demanded by him, it could scarcely have been refused ; but he never pushed his own interests. His masculine inde- pendence in professional conduct, towards supe- 144 Types of Naval Officers riors and inferiors, found its root and its reflection in personal unconcern — as well antecedent as subsequent — about the results from his actions to his fortunes. To do his own part to the utmost, within the lines of the profession he knew, was his conception of duty. As he would not meddle with the land officers' decision as to what they should or should not do, so he left to the politicians, in whose hands the gifts lay, to decide what they would, or should, accord to a success- ful admiral. Pitt, the Great Commoner, left Hawke a commoner. Possibly he recognized that only by stretch of imagination could Hawke be reckoned one of the creations of a great Mini- ster's genius. Little remains to tell. On September 3, 1762, the admiral's flag was hauled down for the last time. He never went to sea again. In 1 766, when Pitt came back to power as Lord Chatham, Hawke became First Lord of the Admiralty, and so remained till 1771. It was a time of unbroken peace, succeeding a period of continuous wars extending over a quarter of a century; conse- quently there was in naval and military matters the lassitude usual to such a period. Hawke is credited with formulating the principle that " the British fleet could only be termed considerable in the proportion it bore to that of the House of Bourbon ; " that is, to the combined navies of France and Spain, over which that House then reigned. The maxim proves that he had some Hawke 45 claim to statesmanship in his view of affairs out- side his service ; and his manifested freedom from self-seeking is the warrant that no secondary politi- cal motives would divert his efforts from this aim. That he succeeded in the main, that he was not re- sponsible for the fallen condition of the fleet when war again arose in 1778, is evidenced by a state- ment, uncontradicted, in the House of Lords in 1779, that when he left office the navy had 139 ships-of-the-line, of which 81 were ready for sea. In 1 765 Hawke, who was then already a full admiral, wearing his flag at the mainmast head, was made Vice-Admiral of Great Britain ; an honorary position, but the highest in point of naval distinction that the nation had to give. As one who held it three-quarters of a century later wrote, " It has ever been regarded as the most distinguished compliment belonging to our pro- fession." The coincidence is significant that upon Hawke's death Rodney succeeded him in it; affirming, as it were, the consecutiveness of paramount influence exercised by the two on the development of the Navy. In 1776 the peerage was at last conferred ; seventeen years after his great victory, and when, having passed three score and ten, a man who had ever disdained to ask must have felt the honor barren to himself, though acceptable for his son. His last recorded professional utterances are in private letters addressed in the summer of 1 780 146 Types of Naval Officers to the commander-in-chief of the Channel Fleet — Francis Geary — who had served with him in the Bay of Biscay, though he missed Ouiberon. He recommends the maintenance of his old station off Brest, and says, '' For God's sake, if you should be so lucky as to get sight of the enemy, get as close to them as possible. Do not let them shufHe with you by engaging at a dis- tance, but get within musket shot if you can. This will be the means to make the action deci- sive." In these words we find an unbroken chain of tradition between Hawke and Nelson. One of Hawke's pupils was William Locker ; and Locker in turn, just before Hawke's death, had Nelson for a lieutenant. To him Nelson in after years, in the height of his glory, wrote, " To you, my dear friend, I owe much of my success. It was you who taught me, — ' Lay a Frenchman close and you will beat him.' " Hawke died October 16, 1781. On his tomb appear these words, " Wherever he sailed, victory attended him." It is much to say, but it is not all. Victory does not always follow desert. " It is not in mortals to command success," — a favor- ite quotation with the successful admirals St. Vin- cent and Nelson. Hawke's great and distinctive glory is this, — that he, more than any one man, was the source and origin of the new life, the new spirit, of his service. There were many brave men before him, as there were after; but it fell to him in a time of great professional prostration Hawke i_^^ not only to lift up and hand on a fallen torch, but in himself to embody an ideal and an inspiration from which others drew, thus rekindling a li 5 > description of engage- ment, 21, 22, 41, 42, 43; court- martial of, 27, 28 ; author's criti- cism of, 45, 56. Mediterranean, fighting begins in, 1759. 133 ; Nelson returns from cruise in, 351, 352; 400; 411; British expedition enters, 413 ; Pellew cruises in, 430 ; Pellew is appointed Commander-in-chief in, 460; 461. MiLLBANK, Admiral, 297. Minorca, Byng's incompetency at, 5, 20 ; affair at, reviewed, 47-63 ; French send a fleet against, 104; 492 Index French fleet lands at, 104; 156; 367- Mona Passage, 244. MoNCTON, General, his reluctance to move, 161 ; sends troops to Jamaica, 166. MoN'K, commands in Four Days Battle, II. Montague, ship, 312; 313. Montgomery, fall of, 432. MoREAU, French general, 347. Moultrie, Fort, attack of British fleet on, 386. Mutiny, in British navy, 1797, 358, 359 ; on ship Marlborough, 363- 367- Naples, Kingdom of, Napoleon designs to occupy, 413; 463. Napoleon Bonaparte, contem- porary of Jervis, 346 ; before Mantua, 347; 402; 403; 411; practically absolute ruler of Europe, 412; designs to occupy Portugal and Kingdom of Naples, 413; threatens Saum- arez's flank, 414; concentrates Spanish and French navies at Cadiz, 414; agreement of, with Czar, at Tilsit, 421 ; breach of, with Russia, 422 ; forces Sweden to declaration of war, 422 ; 454 ; decline of, coincides with Pel- lew's advance, 461. Narragansett Bay, 210; D'Es- taing's fleet at, 281 ; 387. Naval Warfare, in i8th century, 3, et seq.; Hawke and Rodney identified with, 4; advance in, shown by two great failures, 5 ; waged with vessels moved by oars, 7 ; such method more re- liable than by sail, 7 ; its scene long in the Mediterranean, 8 ; introduction of cannon in, 8 ; a period of systematization sets in, 9; period of transition in. 12 ; Tourville's influence on, 14; peace of Utrecht closed transi- tional period in, 68 ; Napoleon's influence on, 68, 69; conditions of, in i8th century, 74, 75; ad- vance of, in 19th century. Navy, French, its movements at Quiberon Bay, 125; attempts to concentrate at Brest, 126; van- quished by Hawke, 141 ; con- centrated at Cadiz, 414. Navy of Great Britain, in 1739, 69; permitted to decline, 100. Navy of U. S., in 18 12, 69. Nelson, Admiral, his remarkable order at Trafalgar, alluded to, 7 ; on true way of fighting, 30 ; on the comparative value of prize money, 88 ; 146 ; appointed to command a ship by Howe, 298 ; letter of, to his brother, 298; opinion of, of Jervis's Mediter- ranean fleet, 330; remark of, concerning Hood, 335 ; criticises movements of British fleet, 1795, 346- his criticism of Admiral Mann, 349 ; return from mission up Mediterranean, 351, 352; at battle off Cape St. Vincent, 355; receives Spanish surrender, 355, 356 ; approves sentence of sea- men of ship St. George, 361 ; 362 ; contrasted with Jervis, Earl St. Vincent, 378, 379 ; esteem of, for Jervis, 379; credit due to, for victory of the Nile, 379 ; con- trasted with Saumarez, 383 ; 401 ; 402; his lack of personal sym- pathy with Saumarez, 407 ; Saumarez's unfortunate remark to, 407; at battle of the Nile, 407-409; 410; Baltic league shattered by, 413; eulogizes Saumarez in House of Lords, 421 ; seamanship of, contrasted with that of Pell ew, 446; anec- dote of, 446 ; mentions incident Index 493 of Algerine policy, 462, 463 ; de- nounces Algerine piracy, 463; Israel Pellew with, at Trafalgar, 476. Nevis, island, 394. Newport, D'Estaing enters harbor of, 281. Nile, battle of, 362 ; Admiral Howe's estimate of, 379 ; credit due to Admiral Lord St. Vin- cent for, 379, 380 ; Saumarez cruises in, 384 ; 403 ; description of battle of, 405-408 ; Saumarez wounded at, 409. Nore, threatening mutinies of, 454- NoRRis, Captain, absconds to avoid trial, 37. Nymphe, frigate, Pellew in com- mand of, 447 ; 448 ; fight of, with Cleopdtre, 448, 449. Orient, ship. Nelson's coffin made from mainmast of, 353 ; blows up, 407. Orion, ship, Saumarez appointed to command, 400 ; 401 ; 406 ; 409; 410. Palliser, Vice-Admiral, accused of betrayal of his chief, 182 ; twelve admirals memorialize the king against, 182. Paris, Rodney settles in, 175. Parker, Admiral, Rodney writes to, 225. Parker, Commodore Sir Peter, 385- Passaro, Cape, Battle of, 69. Pegase, ship, 331. Pellew, Admiral, asks for court- martial upon a mutiny, 367 ; 368 ; 389 ; 428 ; of Norman extrac- tion, 428 ; early orthography of name, 428 ; settlement of family in England, 429 ; father of, 429; fearlessness of, at school, 429; goes afloat, 430; sides with a companion in a quarrel and leaves the ship, 430; intimacy of, with Captain PownoU, 431 ; brought in contact with Ameri- can revolution, 431 ; at recep- tion of Burgoyne on ship Blonde, 431 ; saves a sailor from drown- ing, 431 ; exuberant vitality of, 431 ; anecdote of recklessness of, 431 ; anecdote of accident to, 435 \ second officer of Carleton, 437 ; in battle of Lake Cham- plain, 436, 437 ; by loss of su- periors left in command, 438 ; gallantry of, in contest, 438 ; is commended by Douglas, Lord Howe and the Admiralty, 440 ; is promised promotion, 440; gives chase to Arnold, 441 ; lands at Crown Point, 441 ; ac- companies Burgoyne, 442 ; re- turns to England, 442 ; promoted to a lieutenancy, 442 ; serves under Capt. Pownoll, 442 ; lieu- tenant of frigate Apollo, 442 ; meets French frigate Stanislas, 442 ; action with, 442 ; succeeds to command at death of Pownoll, 442 ; grief of, for death of Pow- noll, 443 ; gains promotion, 443 ; destroys French privateers, 443 ; wins grade of post-captain, 443 ; in time of peace tries farming, 443 ; commands frigate on New- foundland Station, 444 ; per- sonal activity of, 444 ; anecdotes of, 444, 445 ; his knowledge of seamanship, 446 ; 447 ; in com- mand of Nymphe, 447 ; at fight between Nymphe and CleopAtre, 448, 449 ; Lord Howe com- mends, 450; opposes French privateers, 451, 452 ; directs res- cue of troops, passengers, and crew of ship Button, 452-454 ; stationed off Brest, 454 ; dis- 494 Index couraged appointment of Roman Catholic chaplains, 455 ; opposes enfranchisement of Roman Cath- olics, 455 ; follows French expe- dition against Ireland, 455, 456; sails for Falmouth, 456 ; fights Indefatigable and Amazon against Droits de PHonnne, 456-458 ; narrow escape of, from ship- wreck, 458 ; great personal endurance of, illustrated, 459 ; eminent qualities of, 459; holds command in India, 459, 460 ; appointed commander-in-chief in Mediterranean, 460 ; made a rear-admiral, 460 ; assigned to East India station, 460 ; Medi- terranean command of, coincides with Bonaparte's falling for- tunes, 461 ; created Baron Ex- mouth, 462 ; visits Barbary ports, 462 ; compels release of slaves, 462 ; demands peace for Sar- dinia, 463 ; arranges with Tunis and Tripoli for treatment of cap>- tives, 463 ; Algiers refuses con- cession to, regarding treatment of captives, 464 ; demands release of all Christian slaves in Algiers, 464 ; despatches cruiser to Al- giers, 466 ; instructions of, to Capt. Charles Warde, 466 ; asks for small force against Algiers, 467 ; preparations of, against Algiers, 468; sails for Algiers, 468 ; joins Dutch fleet at Gibral- tar, 468 ; arrives at Algiers Bay, 468 ; serves demands on Dey of Algiers, 468 ; receives no an- swer, 468 ; opens battle, 469, 470; is slightly wounded, 473; receives submission of Dey, 473 ; frees Algerian, Tunisian, and Tripolitan slaves, 474 ; returns to England, 474 ; close of career of, 475; later days of, 475, 476; religious nature of, 476; death of, 476; rank of, at death 476. Pellew, Israel, bravery of, in fight between Nymphe and Cleopdtre, 448, 449 ; promoted to post-captain, 451 ; 476. Penmarcks, rocks, 458. Penn, Sir William, his criticism of Four Days Battle, 12. Perry, Commander, 436. Petiple Soiiverain, ship, 406. Philadelphia, evacuation of, 284. Pitt, William, defends Admiral Byng, 105 ; his dislike of Hawke, 106; his military purpose, no; proposed series of descents on French coast, no; his impetu- osity a spur to laggards, 113 ; his energy felt in civil administra- tion, 114; blames military and naval leaders, 115; his injustice meets rebuke, 116 ; profits by Hawke's suggestions, 117 ; leaves Hawke a commodore, 144 ; succeeded by Lord St. Vincent in Admiralty, 380. Plattsburg, 436. Plymouth, ship Dutton driven ashore at, 452. PococK, Admiral, 164 ; 165. Poder, ship, 41, 42, 43, 86. Point Judith, 281. Fompee, ship, dismasted at Al- geciras, 416 ; withdraws under tow, 417; 418. Porcupine, sloop-of-war, 326. Portland, ship, 80. Port Mahon, surrendered, 105 ; 156; 367- Porto Rico, 244. Portugal, Napoleon designs to occupy, 413; 414. Pow^NOLL, Captain, intimacy of, with Pellew, 431 ; commands fri- gate Apollo, 442 ; death of, 442. Prince, ship, 365. Prince M'illiam, ship, 188. Index 495 Quebec, 432. Queen Charlotte, ship, 250, 265 ; 305; 311; 313; Z^T^ 469; 470; 472; 473- Quiberon Bay, Hawke's disregard of pilotage difficulties at, 114; Hawke's triumph at, 122 ; France determines to invade England, 124; location of, 125; Hawke crowds all sail for, 136; islands of, cultivated as kitchen gardens, 141 ; Howe at, 273 ; 460. Ramillies, ship, 60, 61. Real, ship, 41, 44. Real Carlos, ship, 417; 420; re- markable loss of, 420. Red Sea, 403. Reunion, frigate, quits Cherbourg, 399 ; meets British frigate Cres- cent, 399 ; action of, with Cres- cent, 399, 400. Revenge, ship, 59 ; 60 ; 62. Rhode Island, Saumarez sent to, 387 ; British retreat to, 387. Richelieu, river, 433 ; 434. Robespierre, orders of, to Ad- miral Villaret-Joyeuse, 301. Rochefort, Hawke's expedition against, iii ; Conflans's vessels escape to, 141. Rochetts, country seat of Lord St. Vincent, 380. Rodney, Admiral, development of naval warfare identified with name of, 4 ; uplifted the navy, 6 ; before Havre, 126; succeeds Hawke, 145; his descent, 148; his father in command of the royal yacht, 148; George I. his sponsor, 148; given the name of the king, 148; his advancement, 148 ; contrasted in temperament with Hawke, 152; presented at Court, 153; complimented to the king, 153; appointed Com- modore, and commander of Newfoundland station, 154; let- ter to, from Earl of Sandwich, 154, 155; the Earl's confidence in, 1 55 ; returns to England, 1 56 ; elected to Parliament, 156; no connection with Minorca inci- dent, 156, breaks with tradition, 156; accompanies Rochefort ex- pedition under Hawke, 157; commands ship-of-the-line under Boscawen, at Louisburg, 157; again returns to England, 157; promoted to rear-admiral, 158; operates against Havre and Brest, 158; again elected to Par- liament, 158; appointed to Lee- ward Islands station, 158; sails for his new post, 158; begins operations against Martinique, 158; begins hostilities against Spain, 159; receives intelligence of approach of Brest fleet, 160; gives pursuit, 160; hastens to succor of Jamaica, 160; takes the responsibility, 162, 163; his bitter disappointment, 164; or- dered to join expedition under Pocock, 164; his letter to Earl of Sandwich, 164; goes to Mar- tinique, 166; at fall of Havana, 166 ; active service in Seven Years War terminated, 166; re- turns to England, 1763, 166; made a vice-admiral of the Blue, and vice-admiral of the Red, 167 ; appointed commander-in- chief at Jamaica, 167 ; governor of Greenwich hospital, 167 ; his report concerning free-ports, 169, 170; was a pronounced Tory, 170 ; demands of governor of Carta- gena delivery of captured war schooner Haivke, 171 ; disturbs British ministry by Hawke inci- dent, 172 ; Sandwich's caution- ary letter to, 172, 173 ; his act justified by government, 174; 496 Index Sandwich reassures him, 174; his hopes for a colonial appoint- ment, 174; Jamaica his first choice, 174; Sandwich's renewed assurances, 175; is superseded, 175; has permission to remain at Jamaica, 175; lands in England, 175; lacked influence to obtain preferment, 175 ; settles in Paris, 175; becomes pecuniarily in- volved, 175; applies to Admir- alty for employment, 176; his application disregarded, 176 ; ad- miral of white squadron, 177; declaration of Sandwich con- cerning, in House of Lords, 178 ; Richard Cumberland's remark concerning, 178; detained in France by creditors, 179; Lady Rodney's efforts to release, 179; Marechal Biron makes advance to, 179; demands of creditors of, satisfied, 179, 180; repays Biron, 180; returns to England, 180; appointed to command Leeward Islands station, 185; analysis of his powers in 1782, 186; Sand- wich urges him to sea with all despatch, 187 ; sails from Plym- outh, 187 ; captures a Spanish convoy, 188 ; sights Spanish fleet, off Cape St. Vincent, 188; is congratulated by Sandwich, 190; letter of latter to, 191 ; let- ter to, from Lady Rodney, 191 ; his reply, 192 ; his report of bat- tle, 192; Sandwich's letter to, 193 ; England's joy over achieve- ment of, 193; reaches St. Lucia, 194; place of, among naval chiefs, 196; follows De Guichen's sail- ing from Martinique, 197; over- takes French fleet, 197 ; attacks the enemy, 198 ; criticises mis- conduct of his officers, 204 ; his stern discipline, 206, 207 ; makes suggestions to the Admiralty, 209 ; sails for North American coast, 211; anchors off Sandy Hook, 21 1 ; his coming a grievous blow^ to Washington, 211; dis- claims intention of offending Arbuthnot, 213; lands at New York, 214; returns to West In- dies, 216; destruction of Lan- gara's fleet by, 216; reaches Barbados, 217 ; vessels lost in hurricane, 217 ; ordered to pro- ceed against Dutch shipping, 217; captures St. Eustatius island, 218; captures Dutch fleet of merchant ships, 218; author criticises hampering of Hood, 222 ; writes to Admiral Parker, 225 ; is advised of approach of French fleet, 225, 226 ; devotes himself to supervision of St. Eustatius island, 226; his error, 227 ; sends small force against De Grasse, 229 ; forced to retire, 230; his return to England, 232; again afloat, 232 ; sails for his station, 232 ; reaches Barbados, 234 ; learns of capitulation of St. Kitts, 235; takes united fleet to Santa Lucia, 235 ; is assailed in Parliament, 235 ; follows French fleet from Martinique, 236; pushes reinforcements to Hood, 237 ; battle with De Grasse, 238- 242 ; his victory, 242 ; moves toward Jamaica, 243 ; is criticised for lethargic action, by Hood, 244; his defence, 244, 245 ; anal- ysis of character as shown in battle with De Grasse, 248, 249, 250 ; his professional career ends, 251 ; is superseded, 251 ; succeeded by Pigot, 251 ; leaves Jamaica and lands at Bristol, 251; Hood's comment on, 252 ; re- ceives thanks of Parliament, 252 ; advanced to the peerage, 252 ; is voted a pension, 252 ; his other Index 497 honors, 253 ; made vice-admiral of Great Britain, 253 ; his troub- lous later years, 253; death of, 253 ; in accord with Lord Sand- wich, 287. Rodney, Lady, goes to England to obtain pecuniary relief for husband, 179; her letter to hus- band concerning victory off Cape St. Vincent, 191, 192. RooKE, Admiral, his movements off Malaga, 15. Rowley, Rear-Admiral, off Tou- lon, 21, 28 ; compliments Hawke, 84. Royal, Fort, 235. Royal George, ship, 140; loss of> 290 ; 393- Royal Savage, schooner, 438. Rtissell, ship, Saumarez appointed to command, 395 ; 396. Russia, Sweden at war with, 421 ; breach of, with Napoleon, 422 ; fleet of, takes refuge in Gulf of Finland, 425. Russia, Czar of, 421. St. Antoine, ship, 420. St. Christopher, island, 394. St. Eustatius, island, captured by Rodney, 217, 218 ; recaptured by French, 233; Rodney assailed in Parliament for acts at, 235. St. George^ ship, 351 ; two seamen of, condemned for infamous crime, 360; outburst of crew of, 360; execution of seamen of, 361. St. Johns (Canada) ; 434, 435 ; 437- St. Kitts, 163; 165; 228; is be- sieged by French, 234; capitu- lates, 235, St. Lawrence, river, 433 ; 434. St. Vincent, Cape, captured by British, 159; Spanish fleet sighted by Rodney, off, 188 ; battle off, 190 ; victory of Jervis at, 345 ; 353 ; 355 ; Jervis's battle off, 352-357 ; Saumarez at battle off, 400. St. Vincent, Earl, declines a com- mand, 286; denounces ministry to George IIL, 287 ; Admiral Jervis created, 356; 359; 360; 361; 362; 364; 367; 368; 370; 372; 373; 374; 375; 376; zn\ 379 ; 380 ; 381 ; 401 ; assumes command Channel fleet, 411 ; complimentary note of, to Sau- marez, 411, 412; his praise of Saumarez, 412, 413; recognizes ability of Pellew, 460, see also Jervis. Sainte-Andr6, Jean Bon, 312. Sandwich, Earl of, letter from, to Rodney, 154, 155; his confidence in Rodney, 155; his cautionary letter to Rodney, 172, 173 ; dis- regards Rodney's application for employment, 176; his remark concerning Rodney in House of Lords, 178 ; urges Rodney to sea with all despatch, 187 ; con- gratulates Rodney, 190; private letter from, to Rodney, 193; character of, 285, 286. Sandy Hook, Rodney anchors off, 211. San Fiorenzo Bay, 333; 348. San Josef, %h\^, 355. San Nicolas, ship, 355. Santa Lucia, island, captured by British, 159; 228; French pro- ceed against, 229; failure of attack on, 229; Rodney takes united fleet to, 235 ; 245 ; 248. Santo Domingo, 244. Saratoga, 276 ; 441; 442. Sardinia, Lord Exmouth demands peace for, 463. Saumarez, Admiral, 382; birth of, 383 ; his mastery of French lan- guage, 383; lineage of, 383 ; con- trasted with Nelson, 383 ; early 32 498 Index taste of, for navy, 383 ; begins career at early age, 383, 384 ; goes afloat at thirteen, 384; cruises in Mediterranean, 384; follows Nelson in pursuit of Bonaparte's fleet, 384 ; return of, to England, 384; examined for promotion to lieutenancy, 384 ; appointed Mas- ter's Mate, 384; owes advance- ment to Admiral Keppel, 384, 385 ; sails in squadron com- manded by Commodore Sir Peter Parker, 385 ; offered com- mission by Lord Cornwallis, 385 ; meeting of, with Cornwallis subsequently, 385; arrives off Charleston, 386; aids in attack on Fort Moultrie, 386 ; courage of, in action, 387 ; promotion of, to lieutenancy, 387 ; in command of a galley, 387 ; is sent to Rhode Island, 387 ; stationed at Sea- komet, 388 ; returns to England, 388 ; his lot thrown with line-of- battle force, 388, 389 ; in action with Dutch off Dogger Bank, 391, 392 ; again promoted, 392 ; made commander of Tisiphone^ 392 ; on the tide which leads to fortune, 393 ; reaches Barbados, 394; joins fleet, 394; encounters French fleet under De Grasse, 394 ; effects brilliant manoeuvre, 394; ordered to England, 395; Hood substitutes another officer, 395 ; appointed to command Russell, 495 ; an acting post-cap- tain, 395; bravery of, in Rod- ney's renowned battle, 395, 396 ; engages De Grasse's flagship, 396; brilliant manoeuvre of, 396 ; promoted and returns to England, 397; in retirement, 397 ; marries, 398 ; makes trip to France, 398 ; at beginning of work on Cherbourg breakwater, 398; receives attention from Louis XVI., 398; appointed to command Crescent, 399; inter- cepts French frigate Riunion, 399 ; analysis of action between Crescent and Reunion, 399; is knighted for victory, 400; ap- pointed to ship-of-the-line Orion, 400 ; captures three French ships, 400; at battle off Cape St. Vincent, 400; blockades Cadiz, 400 ; operates off Toulon, 400; inferior to Trowbridge in eyes of St. Vincent and Nel- son, 401 ; given equal command with Trowbridge, 402 ; his at- tack upon French fleet before Toulon, 402; as a letter writer, 402 ; his record of pursuit of French fleet, 402 ; favors seeking enemy off coast of Egypt, 404; reaches Alexandria, 404 ; returns westward, 404; again sights Alexandria, 404 ; despondency of, 405 ; learns of proximity of enemy in Aboukir Bay, 405; share of, in battle of the Nile, 405 ; wounded, 407, 409 ; unfor- tunate remark of, to Nelson, 407, 408 ; losses of, at battle of Nile, 409 ; convoys prizes to Gibraltar, 409; ordered to home station, 409 ; impatient at delays, 410; reaches England, 410; ap- pointed to command the Ccesar, 410 ; at blockade of Brest, 411 ; St. Vincent's flattering note to, 411, 412 ; importance of situation of, off Brest, 412 ; St. Vincent's praise of, 412, 413; Napoleon threatens flank of, 414; given command of a squadron, 414; now a rear-admiral, 414 ; ordered to blockade Cadiz, 414 ; sails on his mission, 415; arrives off Cadiz, 415; learns of French vessels at Algeciras, 415; starts for Algeciras, 415; finds French Index 499 fleet moored at, 415; steers to engage French, 415; failure of wind interferes with plans of, 415; disaster to two ships of, 416; withdraws to Gibraltar, 416; failure of, 416; confident despatch of, to Admiralty, 417 ; fresh opportunity of, 417 ; learns of approach of Spanish fleet, 417, 418 ; sails in pursuit of Spaniards, 418; gives battle off Algeciras, 420 ; St. Vincent's praise of, 421 ; St. Vincent eulo- gizes, in House of Lords, 421 ; eulogized by Nelson, in House of Lords, 421 ; never again en- gaged in serious encounter with enemy, 421 ; commander-in-chief at Channel Islands, 421 ; insures Swedish neutrality, 422 ; main- tains importance of Baltic, 421 ; disturbs commerce between nations on the Baltic, controlled by Napoleon, 422 ; succeeds to diplomatic situation, 424 ; suc- cess of, 425 ; praise of, by Swed- ish statesman, 425; follows Rus- sian fleet in Gulf of Finland, 426; retires from service, 427; later life at Guernsey, 427 ; re- ceives peerage from William IV., 427 ; death of, 427 ; 476 ; 477. Saumarez, Lord de, 427. Saumarez, Philip, 385. Saunders, Captain, his conduct in battle off La Rochelle, 92. Saunders, Sir Charles, associated with Jervis, 325 ; 328. ScHANK, Admiral, 435. Schuyler, General, 442. Scilly, Howe encounters allied fleet off, 288. Serietise, frigate, 406. Seven Years War, contrasted with American revolution, 102; result of, in North America and India, 102 ; finds Rodney a captain, 156; Rodney's career in, termi- nated, 166; Howe's part in, 260. Siberia (on French coast), 411. Sicily, 403 ; 404. Smuggling, in West Indies, 168, 169. Sorel, town of, 433. South African war, contrasted with American revolution, loi. Spain, refuses to surrender British supply vessel captured by the French, 106 ; Great Britain be- gins hostilities against, 159; in- creases custom-house force in West Indies, 169 ; seeks a quarrel with Great Britain, 171 ; embittered by loss of Havana and Manila, 171 ; near verge of rupture with Great Britain, over Falkland Islands incident, 172; declares war, 185; fleet of, enters English Channel, 185 ; navy of, concentrated at Cadiz, 414. Spanish colonies, in West Indies, their geographical relation to Jamaica, 168; smuggling in, 168. Stamp Act, discontent over, in American colonies, 172. Stanislas, frigate, 442 ; goes aground off Belgian coast, 442, 443- Stewart, Colonel, 446. Superb, ship, 417 ; 419; 420. Sweden, British fleet supports, 421 ; 424; forced by Napoleon to declaration of war, 424. Tagus, river, 351. Ternay, Admiral, 212; 214. Terrible, ship, 91. Thesee, ship, 140. Ticonderoga, 433 \ 441 ; 442. Tilsit, agreements at, 421. Tippoo Saib, 403. Tisiphone, ship, 392 ; 393 ; 395. Tobago, attack on, 229 ; Drake 500 Index meets De Grasse, off, 230 ; sur- renders to De Grasse, 230. Tormant, ship, 90, 91. Torbay, British fleet leaves, 128. Toulon, Admiral Mathews off, 5, 20; engagement off, 21, 22 ; de- scription of action off, 30, 31 ; movements of fleet criticised, ZZ, 34; 346; 348; Saumarez operates off, 400 ; 403 ; 414 ; 415. TouRViLLE, characterization of, 13 ; his death, 14. Trafalgar, 422 ; 461 ; 476. Transvaal, war in, some lessons from, 18. Trident, ship, 60, 61, 64, 91. Tripoli, agrees to treat captives as civilized countries, 463; releases Christian slaves, 474. Troubridge, Captain, 353 ; gal- lantry of, at battle off Cape St. Vincent, 353 ; 355 ; 401 ; 402. Tunis, agrees to treat captives as civilized countries, 463 ; delivers up Christian slaves, 474. Turkey, troops of, slaughter coral fishermen on Algerine coast, 464. United States, Navy of, see Navy of United States. Ushant, island, Howe encounters French fleet off, 302 ; Jervis in battle off, 331. Valcour Island, 436 ; 437. Vengeur, ship,3i4 ; 315; loss of, 316. Victory, ship, 293 ; 354. Vilaine, river, 141, 143. ViLLARET-JoYEUSE Admiral, or- ders of Robespierre to, 301 ; en- counters fleet under Howe, 302 ; 306; attacked by Howe in force, 310; record of, 312. Ville de Paris, flagship of De Grasse, collides with Zele, 238 ; strikes her flag,242j 363; 369; 373. Walpole, on the Colonies, loi. Warde, Captain Charles, instruc- tions of Lord Exmouth to, 466 ; examines defences and sound- ings in port of Algiers, 466. Washington, George, Rodney's coming to American coast a grievous blow to, 211; 214; con- cerning letter of Howe to, 276 ; 279; comment of, on arrival of D'Estaing, 280; letter of, con- cerning movement against Rhode Island, 282, West Indies, smuggling in, 168; Arbuthnot ordered to send ships to, 210 ; conditions in, 1780, 210 Rodney returns to, 216; 392; 393- White, sailing-master, com- mended by Jervis, 342, 343. Whitshed, Admiral Sir James, 266 ; his anecdote of Lord Gard- ner, 266. William III., King of England, grantor of peerage to grandfather of Lord Howe, 256. William IV., King of England, a midshipman at taking of Span- ish convoy, 188 ; confers a peerage on Admiral Saumarez, 427. Wolfe, General, Howe's friend- ship with, 262 ; intimacy of, with Admiral Jervis, 325, 326; anec- dote concerning, 326; message of, by Jervis, to Miss Lowther, 326. York, Duke of, received on ship- board by Howe, 263; holds re- ception, 263, 264. Yorktown, 393. Zealous, ship, 350. Zele, ship, 238 ; collides with flag- ship Ville de Paris, 238. CAPTAIN MAHAN'S LIFE OF NELSON NEW POPULAR EDITION COMPLETE IN ONE VOLUME THE LIFE OF NELSON. The Em- bodiment of the Sea Power of Great Britain. By Capt. a. T. Mahan. With 1 2 portraits and plates in half-tone and a photogravure frontispiece. Crown 8vo. Cloth. 750 pages. $3.00. It is not astonishing that this standard life is already passing into a new edition. It has simply displaced all its predecessors except one, that of Southey, which is the vade-mecum of British patriotism, a stimulant of British loyalty, literature of high quality, but in no sense a serious historical or psychological study. . . . The reader will find in this book three things : an unbroken series of verified historical facts related in minute detail ; a complete picture of the hero, with every virtue justly estimated but with no palliation of weakness or fault ; and lastly a triumphant vindication of a thesis novel and startling to most, that the earth's barriers are continental, its easy and defensible highways those of the trackless ocean. . . . Captain Mahan has revealed the modern world to itself — American Historical Re'vieiVy July, 1899. Captain Mahan' s masterly life of Nelson has already taken its place as the final book on the subject. — Mail and Express ^ New York.. One never tires of reading or reflecting upon the marvellous career of Horatio Nelson, the greatest sea captain the world has known. Captain Mahan has written the best biography of Lord Nelson that has yet been given to the world. — Chicago Evening Post. His biography is not merely the best life of Nelson that has ever been written, but It Is also perfect, and a model among all the biographies of the world. — Pall Mall Gazette. LITTLE, BROWN, & COMPANY, Publishers 254 Washington Street, Boston THE INFLUENCE OF SEA POWER UPON HISTORY, 1660-1783. By Capt. A. T. Mahan. With 25 charts illustrative of great naval battles. 8vo. Cloth, gilt top. ;^4.oo. Captain Mahan has been recognized by all competent judges, not merely as the most distinguished living writer on naval strategy, but as the originator and first exponent of what may be called the philosophy of naval history. — London Times. No book of recent publication has been received with such en- thusiasm of grateful admiration as that written by an officer of the American Navy, Captain Mahan, upon Sea Power and Naval Achievements. It simply supplants all other books on the subject, and takes its place in our libraries as the standard work. — Dean Hole, in ^^ More Memories. ^^ An altogether exceptional work 5 there is nothing like it in the whole range of naval literature. . . . The work is entirely original in conception, masterful in construction, and scholarly in execution. — The Critic. Captain Mahan, whose name is famous all the world over as that of the author of **The Influence of Sea Power upon History," a work, or rather a series of works, which may fairly be said to have codified the laws of naval strategy. — The Westminster Gazette. An instructive work of the highest value and interest to students and to the reading public, and should find its way into all the libra - ries and homes of the land. — Magazine of American History. A book that must be read. First, it must be read by all school- masters, from the head-master of Eton to the head of the humblest board-school in the country. No man is fit to train English boys to fulfil their duties as Englishmen who has not marked, learned, and inwardly digested it. Secondly, it must be read by every Englishman and Englishwoman who wishes to be worthy of that name. It is no hard or irksome task to which I call them. The writing is throughout clear, vigorous, and incisive. . . . The book deserves and must attain a world-wide reputation. — Colonel Maurice, of the Bnitish Army, in the " United Ser'vice Magazine."" LITTLE, BROWN, & COMPANY, Publishers 254 Washington Street, Boston THE INFLUENCE OF SEA POWER upon the French Revolution and Em- pire. By Capt. a. T. Mahan. With 13 maps and battle plans. 2 vols. 8vo. Cloth, gilt top. $6.00. A highly interesting and an important work, having lessons and suggestions which are calculated to be of high value to the people of the United States. His pages abound with spirited and careful accounts of the great naval battles and manoeuvres which occurred during the period treated. — Nenv York "Tribune. Captain Mahan has done more than to write a new book upon naval history. He has even done more than to write the best book that has ever been written upon naval history, though he has done this likewise ; for he has written a book which may be regarded as founding a new school of naval historical writing. Captain Mahan' s volumes are already accepted as the standard authorities of their kind, not only here, but in England and in Europe generally. It should be a matter of pride to all Americans that an officer of our own navy should have written such books. — Theodore Roosevelt, in ** Political Science ^arterly.'"'' THE LIFE OF NELSON : The Em- bodiment of the Sea Power of Great Britain. By Capt. a. T. Mahan. With 19 por- traits and plates in photogravure and 21 maps and battle plans. 2 vols. 8vo. Cloth, gilt top. ^8.00. Captain Mahan' s work will become one of the greatest naval classics. — London Times. The greatest literary achievement of the author of " The In- fluence of Sea Power upon History." Never before have charm of style, perfect professional knowledge, the insight and balanced judgment of a great historian, and deep admiration for the hero been blended in any biography of Nelson. — London Standard. LITTLE, BROWN, & COMPANY, Publishers 254 Washington Street, Boston THE PROBLEM OF ASIA and its Effect upon International Policies. By A. T. MAHAN, D.C.L., LL.D., Capt. United States Navy, author of " The Influence of Sea Power upon History,'* ** Types of Naval Officers," **The Life of Nelson,*' etc. Crown 8vo. Cloth, gilt top, ^2.00. Contents : I. The Problem of Asia. II. Effect of Asiatic Con- ditions upon World Policies. III. Merits of the Transvaal Dispute. Captain Mahan has scored another distinct success. ... A strong book, fascinating in its interest and invaluable as a philosophical statement of the greatest international problem the world has faced for many a year, — St. Paul Pioneer Press. Capt. Mahan is a writer of great influence, and his influence is not likely to wane while he continues to write such books as this. — Mail and Express, N. r. A volume which every thoughtful American may well read and ponder. — Boston Journal. LESSONS OF THE WAR WITH SPAIN, and other Articles. By Capt. A. T. MAHAN, author of "The Influence of Sea Power upon History," etc. Crown 8vo. Cloth, gilt top, ^2.00. Contents: Lessons of the War with Spain, 1898; The Peace Conference and the Moral Aspect of the War; The Relations of the United States to their New Dependencies; Distinguishing Qualities of Ships of War; Current Fallacies upon Naval Subjects. THE INTEREST OF AMERICA IN SEA POWER, Present and Future. By Capt. A. T. MAHAN. With two maps showing strategic points. Crown 8vo. Cloth, gilt top, ^2.00. Contents: I. The United States Looking Outward. II. Hawaii and our Sea Power. III. The Isthmus and our Sea Power. IV. Anglo-American Alliance. V. The Future in Relation to American Naval Power. VI. Preparedness for Naval War. VII. A Twentieth-Century Outlook. VIII. Strategic Features of the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea. LITTLE, BROWN, AND COMPANY, P;:^^//V/?'^rj, 2 54 WASHINGTON ST., BOSTON, MASS.