k ^^^H^A Critical Examination [in HHPk- part] of Pennypacker^s Life of General George G. ■ ■ ■ Meade BY HENRY H. HUMPHREYS, A. dc C. : HIGHLAND PARK, Lake County, - - Illinois. ' TIVOLI, N. Y., ■ FRANK 0. GREEN, r 1901. Dana on Meade and Humphreys. •The Niiitli Corps was moved by rail to Annapolis, where it was reoruited up to about twenty-five thousand men. As the time for action neared it was set in motion, and bj' easy marches reached and re-enforced the Army of the Potomac on the morning of. the 6th of May, in the midst of the battle of the Wilderness. It was not formally incorporated with that army imtil later, but, by a sort of Action, it was held to be a distinct army, Burnside acting in concert with Meade, and receiving Iiis orders directly from Grant, as did Meade. These two armies were the exruse for- CIraiit's jx'rsonil ]trespnne. wiMimit ;i(>f imllv superseding Meade. '•In my opinion tiie great soldier of the Army of the Putoindv . .t> General Humiihreys. He was the chief of staff to General Meade and was a strategist, a tactician, and an engineer. Humphreys was a fighter, too, and in this an exception to most engineers. He was a very interesting figure. He used to ride about in a black felt hat. tlie brim of which was turned down all around, making him look like a (Quaker. He was very pleasing to deal with, unless you were fighting against him, and then he was not so pleasant. [He was a Quaker by descent.] * * * * •* * * * * Hum- phreys was a very charming m^n, quite destitute of vanity. I think he had consented to go and serve with Meade as chief of staff out of pure patriotism. He preferred an active command, and eventually on the eve of the end, succeeded to the command of the [combined] Second [Tliird] Corps, and bore a conspicuous part in the Appomatox campaign. — Cliarles A. Dana's Recollections page 191-2. ■Before the army had recovei'ed from its long march from Cold Harbor and the failure to cajiture [Petersburg] there was an unusual amount of controversy going on among the officers. Meade and Warren were so at loggerheads that Meade notified Warren that he must eitlier ask to be relieved as corps-commander or he (Meade) wouhl i)refer charges against him. It seemed as if Meade grew more unpopular every day. Finally the difficulties between him and his subordinates became so serious that a cliange in the commander of tlie Army of the Potomac seemed iirobable. *•;«■** Page 220 •'The Fiftii Corps having pre]mred the way. tiie whole army left the line.s about Cold Harbor on schedule tinte, just as soon after nightfall on the 12tli [June 18G4] as its movements could be concealed from the olxservation of the enemy. It was in drawing orders for such complicated movements as these, along dif- ferent roads and by different crossings, that the ability of General Humplireys. the chief of staff,' was displayed. Everything went perfectly from the start". Page 218 "I had long known Meade to be a man of the worst possible tamper, especially toward his subordinates. I think lie liad not a friend m tlie vvliole army. No man, no matter what his business or his .service, approached him without being insulted in one way or another, and his own staff officers did not dare to speak to him unless first spoken to. for fear of either sneers or curses. Tlie latter however. I had never heard him indulge in very violently, but he was said to apply them often without occasion, and without reason. At the same lime, as far as I was able to ascertain, his generals had lost their confideiKie in him as a commander. His orders for the last series of assaults upon Petersburg, in wliich we lost ten thousand men without gaining any decisive ailvantage, were greatly (n-itici.sed. They were, in effect, tiiat he had found it impractible to secure tlie co-operation of corps-commanders, and that, therefore, each one was to attack on his own account and do the best he could by himself. The < onsequence \\ a f'oiif/iiit('is operation? Lee saw the point and corrected his position at once; the oppoitunity passed, and never presented itself again. We fail to see in what manner the Army of the Potomac gained in the "superi- ority of numbers." unless it be by the addition of the 9th Corps, whose strength was made up mostly by men who had just entered the service; old soldiers well know how much reliance can be placed in such troops. The mobility of the Army was lessened by the breaking up of two Corps, distributing them amongst the other three; for in the country (wooded) in which the army was then moving retarded marching resulted from the excessive strength of the Corps. Corps of less strength would have answered the purpo.se better, would have been more directly under the eyes of their Commanding Officers, and time w^ould havebeen gained in tlie receipt of orders, while the time in making connection, each with the other, would have been shortened. The Chief of Staff of the Army of the Potomac was in favor of small units, and gives his reasons for such preference. See page 3 of the Virginia campaign of 18G4 and fif). 11 As to the Corps cominander who "uinvittingly twice rohl)e(l Meade of victories through incompetence", and the '-advancement of Grant", we have this to say. Meade liad with liim not only the opportunity but the means to rid himself of tools which could not hold their edge, and failing to use them, cannot complain of the presence of tlie T.ieut. Gen'l in the field with the army which he, Meade, commanded. S-c«,yb«*-j*-i4o C| lA- "iC^ It is one of tlie J rinciplesof law, that no man can take advantage of his own wrong. Stfe pago :>(; ) of tho "Life ". We dissent from the views as expressed on page 2G2 of the "Life", of Meade surprising Lee on four different occasions: it was not he. but the admirable Chief of Staff of the Army of the Potomac, who surprised Lee on these occasions; his eyes saw farther into those matters tiian Meade's. The evidence exists in serial nos. 45, 48, 49, war of the Rebellion, official i-ecrQ^>-. and his dispatch i+h+ luuh. on file at the War Dept. U. S. A. ^ccu/v^ We now notice that for the first time the Chief of Staff's name is mentioned on page 260 of the "Life"; previous to this naming, any reader would have derived the impression that such an office was useless to the Commatider of the Army of tlie I'otomac, for on all the pages which have preceded no. 2G6 there is no mention oftliat name in that capacity. Tliis could not have been an oversight cm the part of the Biographer, but has arisen from his desire to put forward tlie claims of his man in stronger light, but as we have said above 'it being determined to move by Lee's right flank. Humphreys. Meade's Chief of Staff was requested by Meade to prepare a project for the movement. Humphreys sketched two plans, one of them turning Lee's right by the Catharpin and Pamunkey roads which was adopted, and in conformity with it Humphreys prepared the order". At this stage of this review of the "Life" we make this statement: all of those able movements previous to the arrival of the Lieut. Gen'l and his accompanying the Army of the Potomac in the field, were not the results of the biain of Meade but v.ere due to the brain of his Chief of Staff, and it was due to him that "during this whole period the Union army met with not a single reverse or disaster, althougli Lee tried against Meade's armor (not Meade's but Hum- phrey's) every si)ear tiiat he knew how to wield". See the Desi)atch Book. The writer of this review believes that when the history of that war is written. Humphreys' name will appear in letters of gold, and his great services in that great struggle will receive their reward. As to the battle of the Wilderness, we have this to say: Lee moved quicker than he did at Mine Run, and endeavored to strike us in flank, whilst in march his movement forced us to halt and fight. The orders from Ud. Qrs. of the Army of tlie Potomac dated May Ttn. lS(i4. at :{ P. M. for the Cavalry were as follows: '^13. Major General Sheridan commanding Cavalry Corps will have sufficient force on the approaches from the right to keep the Corps commanders advised in time of the approach of the enemy". See p. 42.'). appendix G, of the Virginia campaign 1SC4 and "(i.'j. Upon arrival at Todd's Tavern at midnight of the 7th of May. \>*fA, two divisions of Cavalry were found encamped there, and not where they should have been under the above quoted order. Duplicating the orders "with his own hand" were of no avail to us. for th.en the roads to Spottsylvania from our right were in tlie hands of the enemy, and this fact was known to the Chief of Staff, at the date of their lieing written and sent. 12 The "intelligent use" of the cavalry at that time was useless. We are not criti- cising an3'one in this reply but the writer of the "Life". Acknowledging that Cold Harbor was an itnportant point to the army "and on its extension on the left", it was of more importance to us for the contemplated crossing of the James River, as from that place roads lead, down to the points whicli had been selected for the crossing, and that was the reason why it was of such vast importance to ihe army. See page 307 of the "Life". On page 333 of the "Life" we are informed: "The details of the movement upon Petersburg from Cold Harbor had been elaborated by Meade and Hum- phreys, the two great masters of logistics m the Union armj^ with a cai'e that left notliing unprovided for". Now turn to page 201 of the Virginia Campaign of 1864 and 6o. and see what the Chief of Staff has to say upon this same subject. "In preparing the programme of tlie movement, it appeared to me (eqviivalent to the pronoun I) important that Gen'l Warren should move out the Long Bridge road, not onlj' far enough to cover the crossings of the Chickahominy by the army, but so far as to hold the bridge over the White Oak Swamp, and to look towards the three roads to Richmond already mentioned, which substantially met at Riddle's shop, about a mile in advance of the position General Warren was directed to take. "He could not well advance to Riddle's shop, since that would have exposed him to an attack in rear from White Oak Bridge. It was expected that such a movement by General Warren would deceive Lee, and give him the impres- sion tliat the Army of the Potomac was advancing upon Richmond, or if in- tending to cross the James, that it would do so near Malvern Hill, at City Point, or above. The movement made the desired impression upon him, and to a greater extent than was contemplated, for as we shall see farther on, he was uncertain what the Army of the Potomac was doing until tlie afternoon of the 17th of June". At that time (the 17th of June, 1864) three Corps were at Petersburg, Va., and again on page 214, of tlie same work, we find the facts stated as follows for the 16th of Jnue, same year: "At half past ten A. M. he (Lee)telegraphed Beauregard that he did not know the position of Grant's army, and coula not strip the north bank. At 3 P. M. he telegraphed he ha.l not heard of Grant's crossing James River. At that hour only the Sixth Corps and Wilson's cavalry remained on the north bank". We have convicted the writer of the "Life" of appropriating for his hero that which does not belong to him. But further, we find in Mc Clure's Magazine for the month of May, 1898, some reminiscences of (vliarles A. Dana, Ass't. Sec- retary of War who was witli Gen'l Grant. On page 35 of this magazine appears the following: "Tlie Fifth Corps having prepared the way, the whole army left the lines about Cold Harbor on schedule time, just as soon after nightfall on the 12th as its movements would be concealed from the observation of the enemy. It was in drawing orders for such complicated movements as these, along different roads and by diffei-ent crossings, that the ability of Gen'l Humphreys, the Chief of Staff was displayed. Everything went perfectly from the start". We again assert that it was the Chief of Staff's projects wliich were responsi- ble for the surprise of Lee on four occasions, viz. "Manassas Gap. Rappahannock Station. Mine Run, and the winter reconnoissance under Sedgewick'', and in this we are supported by the unanimous voices of all officers of the Army of the 13 Potomac, to wlioiu Humplire.vs was well known. These four examples just stated, the project for crossing the James River (elab- orating), and the forcible impression made upon Lee just related, together with the instructions prejiared for the assault upon Petersburg on the explosion of the mine, to be related further on, form brilliant examples in the art of Strategy. Lo- gistics and Tactic^:, stamping the author of them a consummate commander, and it has been said of him. "If fortune had favored him with independent command, it is certain that the country would have been the gainer"". See the memoir read before the National Academy of Sciences. April 24. 1885. page IL Respecting the mine at Petersburg, Va.. on page 880 of tiie "Life"" there is an en- comium bestowed upon the Commander of the Army of the Potomac by the Com- manding General of all the Armies of the United States. We quote it: "Meade's preliminary' orders were so exact as to cause Grant to say, at the later investiga- tion, that they could not be improved upon with all the light of subsequent results, and that if they had been obeyed Petersburg would have been captured"". Remembering what has been said of the Lieut. Gen'l by the writer of the "Life" we are surprised that his testimony should be brought forward to the support of Meade, but that our readers may know who was the author of the project for the assault after the explosion of the mine, they are referred to Appendix, page K 429, of the Virginia Campaign of 1864 & (55. ^ The office of Chief of Staff was not a clerkship for the recording of the orders of the Coznmanding General of the Army of the Potomac, neither was it a fifth wheel. That office was distinct and separate, as has been clearly defined in this reph'. Were it clerical, that position would have been spurned by Gen'l Humphreys, whose high spirits and just regard for the rights of the office were well known to the army. We notice in readingthe "Life"" that whenever the Commanding General of the Army of the Potomac has need of assistance in maintaining his position, (accord- ing to the ideas of his Biographer) the Chief of Staff is brought forward in sup- port, thus proving his opinion as of great weight, though the readers of the "Life"' would not suspect his presence with that army, and his assistance to it. in the chapters which have preceded that numbered 18. We gratefully acknowledge the intended compliment, but declare in the .same breath that placing him merely upon the same platform cannot be entertained for one moment, of one who possessed such commanding abilities, not only in science and letters, but in that of the Art of War. Of the disaster which befell the 2nd Corps at Ream"s Station in August. "(54, we read on page 886 of the "Life"": "It was reported that the enemy was moving on the Halifax road, and Wilcox was ordered to use the Jerusalem Plank road, thus giving him a march of twelve miles"'. Now turn to page 280 of the Virginia Campaign of 18G4 & 05 and see what the Chief of Statf says of this movement: "But by the plank road his ( Wilcox"s) march was twelve miles long (about the same length as that of Mott"s troops), whereas had he gone by the railroad, which continued open until five o'clock, he would have had not more than five miles to march and would have got to Hancock by half past four or five, and managing his movement skillfully, might have taken a i)art of the enemy's force in Hank or rear". The Virgina Campaign of 1864 & 65 is the history of the labors of one man. re- lated in such language that one does not ])erceive that the atithor is telling his readers what part of the work he performed: but one who reads closely, can see 14 what he did, — a duty not of a brilliant character, because the work was of the closest character, but all the more arduous, in as much as each fact had to be given its full value before action could be taken, and when it was weighed, results followed of great benefit: nor was he absent from the field of battle in which he gloried; his fingers were upon the pulse of each great strviggle; and when he gave his opinion it was acted upon at once; never a mistake was made by him; we are therefore surprised at the ingenious manner in which the historian of the "Life" has turned this work to glorify tlie one man. If it be true as related on page 3 of the "introductory" to the "Life ' that the Commanding Gen'l could tell at any time of the night wlien firing occurred, ex- actly what troops were engaged, "and if occasion required, he made the dispo- sition of his army without needing to consult a map", then this acquirement, must have resulted from his association with his perfectly "poised" Chief of Staff, who possessed this peculiar gift to a degree remarkable, and this is the first time we are made aware some one else had it. We should certainly have heard of it from our connection with the Hd. Qrs. of the Army of the Potomac. We now return to page 5 of the "introductory" chapter which states as fol- lows: "In his address before the Society of the Army of the Potomac, June 12th 1899, Courtlandt Parker quotes from a letter written by Gen"l Lee after the war as follows: 'Meade in ray judgement, had the greatest ability. I feared him more than any man I ever met upon the field of battle'. He also quotes Jeffer- son Davis as saying; 'My idea is that Meade was tlie most skillful general in the Fedei'al army. Gen'l Lee once said to me, that he could understand the movements of all the generals in the Federal army easier than those of Gen'l Meade'. In a letter to the present writer, dated January 31st, 1887, Mr. Davis said: 'I had a high opinion of and sincere regard for General Meade, both of which were manifested long before the war"'. If that which has just been quoted be true, there was good reason for it on the part of Lee, who might say it for the purpose of exalting his own ability, but whilst so doing, it is very probable, he was praising some one else infer- entially, the one we speak for. Alas he cannot do so now, but were he living the author of the "Life" would be required to take back very, very many of "tlie interpretations put upon such facts (for which) the autlior is alone responsible". Mr. Davis and Gen'l Humphreys were friends long before the Civil War: the former gentlemen liad the faculty of discovering men of ability, men who w^ould be willing horses, wlio would work, and no matter what was the amount required of them, would accept other matters equally as lieavy, requiring research, and the consuming of that delicate substance called "grey matter"; nor was Mr. Davis wrong in his selection of Gen'l Humphreys as such a man. We have the following from the lips of Gen'l Humphreys, who saw a letter written by Mr. Davis to a friend, this friend showing tiiat letter to the Gen- eral, who told of it to his very dear friend, Bvt. Major General John Watts De Peyster, of Tivoli, Duchess County, New York, who in a notice of the death of Gen'l Humphreys, published it amongst other matters pertaining to the General. This particular phrase can be found on page 5 of the pamphlet and reads: "On the other hand, one of the leaders of the Rebellion, in many respects its Arch magus, after the four successive changes in the command of the Army of the Potomac, observed: "They have not got the right man yet, and they never will have him until they appoint Andrew^ Atkinson Humphreys'"; again same page. "An officer in tlie Rebel Army, who occupied a very conspicuous position, a hard 15 military student, and well versed in military operations, remarks in substance, that 'while he looked upon Hancock as the best fighter in the Army of the Potomac, Humphreys was best fitted to command it"". "Humphreys" leadership and soldiership"', was the attest of a veteran observer, "were so unobtrusive that tlie country was not aware of what an able man it possessed in him." A Major General, himself very distinguished, experienced and esteemed, who occupied a position which gave him the amplest opportunities of judging, said that he "con- sidered Humphreys, take him all in all. the best General iu the Army of the Po- tomac, or the best fitted to command it." Another ofticer, whose peculiar, va- ried and constant service gave him vmusual advantages for judging and compar- ing, said a verj^ handsome thing of Humphreys: "For general as well as inti- mate acquaintance with the country in which he (Humphreys) was operating, and the troops against whom he was engaged, in fact, the general relative situa- ton of affairs. Humphreys was second to no other Union general."' Another gallant soldier remarks, "Take him all in all, soldiership, culture, science, gen- eralship, manners, lines of thought, social relations, dispositions, intention and energy, friendship and affection, he realized the words of another unfortunate, the poet, George Brookford. singing over the grave of a national hero. 'The noble heart, the master mind, The chief that knew no fear. And leaves no warrior peer beliind. Lies sleeping soundly here. When riding "mid the battle's blaze, His eye with soul afire. The traitor foe stood still to gaze. And wonder and admire.'"" General Humphreys, (we cannot find a better expression than that stated on page 16 of the "Life") would have scorned "to have taken credit for another's work"; that "wasimposible to him"' and "unworthy of a soldier and a gentleman". It would have been far better had the curtain which has screened the lives of Gen'ls Meade and Humphreys remained down, but taking up exultingly tlie gage of battle wliicli has been cast before him, the writer performs a duty which is considered sacred. It is with deep regret that he is compelled to speak as he has done, for both were members of the same Corps, and friends of long standing. On November, 25th, 1864, Major General Humphreys was assigned to the com- mand of the 2nd Corps, a duty which was far more pleasant than the thankle.ss position of Chief of Staff to one who never did anything for him, yet relied upon him to pull the Commanding General out of a bad position. Henry H. Humphreys. Highland Park, Lake County, 111. July 3rd, 1901. l« Dana on Meaili and llun\phrfys, CoiitiiiKid. that each gained some advantage of position, but eacli exliausted liis own strengtJi in so doing; while for the want of a general pvirpose and a general commander to direct and concentrate the wliole, it all amounted to nothing biit heavy loss to ourselves. General Wright remarked confidentially to a friend that all of Meade's attacks had been made without brains and without general- sliip". — ''Recollections of tiie Civil War, with the Leaders at Washington and in the Field in the Sixties. By Charles A. Dana, Assistant Secretary of War from 18r.3 to t.%.1. New York: D. Appleton and Company, 189!t, (pp. 226-27.) Aftermath. In regard to Meade's failure to attack Lee at Williamsport and Falling Waters there is one remarkable circumstance which does not seem to have ever appeared in print. The writer was on the most Intimate possible terms with many of our most notable Union generals, among tliese particularly with Major-Generals James B. Fry, Frovost-Marshal-General, and Abner D6ubleday. toth at Wash- ington after Gettysburg. They told him that when Meade was before Lee on the Potomac, tliey knew tliat Lincoln telegraphed to Meade "to attack Lee, liit or miss — that if he failed, to produce this telegram in extenuation of his failure and throw the whole bhune upon him, the President, and that if he were victo- rious to destroy the telegram and take all the glory to himself." That Lincoln did so was corroborated by a remark which he made to another friend, another Major-General, that "twice the Army of Northern Virginia had been delivered, horse, foot and dragoons, into the hands of the Army of the Potomac, and that lie was so disappointed, that if, he were tlie Disposer of Events, he did not know if he would do it a third time."' Tliese were not his exact words, which were so terse and emphatic, that it is most politic not to repeat them verbatim, Major-General George W. Culhun declared that the writer's memory was so trustworthy in his reports of conversations that the notes of a stenographer, taken down at the time, could not be more correct. And General Fry averred tliat the writer's report of a certain convex'sation was as perfect, some time afterward, as if he had written it down while it was occurring. Major-General A. A. Humphreys was tlie writer's dearest friend, and his criticisms are as jiatent to memory as if they had been stereotyped. The record of Dana in regard to Humphreys a)>peared in his published IMemoranda. In his published obitu- aries of Humphrey and of Meade, the writer's views of Meade's irresolution have been in print for many years, and therefore they cannot be charged as opinions apres coup. He has been all over a large portion of the ground between Jleade's headquarters and the Potomac, and considers that all the accidents of the fields of operations were in favor of the Army of the Potomac. General Doubleday declared that the River was "swimming" at the time — that is in full flooil with rapid current: yet, nevertheless, Lee svas enabled to escape with impunity. The writer would have added his information in full to the preceding pages, but he is far advanced in his 81st year, and broken with the consequences of two painful attacks and one terrible attack of the grippe, and therefore does not seek a controversy. But those who know him intimately will testify that liis memory was never more tenacious, and that his mind is as clear if not clearer than it ever was. These remarks are ijenned in justice to the memory/Tif Humphreys, than whom he never met a .superior as a soldier and general 1/any one respect, or a grander uTan: Plumphrey's only peer in his memory wa<^Iajor- General George H. Thomas, while the latters peer as an imposing spflrimen of mortality he never did meet in luiman form and magnanimity. i*-. ''^~^.. ANCHOR. (J, W. deP.)* \ LIBRftRY OF CONGRESS 013 700 143 3 % ^